Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1980-10424 r )0-, :;. I t ~; . RESOLUTION NO. 10424 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR HUDSON VALLEY ESTATES UNIT NO.1, CHULA VISTA TRACT 77-10 The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does herebf resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista has heretofore approved that certain tentative map of a subdivision to be known as Hudson Valley Estates Unit No., 1, Chula Vista Tract 77-10, and has recommended that the City Coun~il approve said tentative map subject to the conditions con~ained in Planning Commission Resolution No. PCS-77-10 (Revised), adopted on the 11th day of March, 1981, a copy of which is ~ttachedlhereto and by this reference made a part hereof the same as though fully set forth herein, and I WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Committee found that the environmental impact report, EIR-78-1, prepared for the previous project was adequate and satisfied CEQA review require- ments for this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve said tentative SUbdivision map in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. PCS-77-10 (Revised). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does herby certify that EIR-78-1 has been reviewed and the information considered, and that it has been prepared in accordance with CEQA 1970, as amended, the California Administra- tive Code and the Environmental Review Policy of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by ,./1 City' A't torney ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUl..A VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 7th 19~ 1 , by the folJowing vote, to-wlt: day of April AYES: Councilmen Gillow', Hyde, Cox, McCand1iss, Scott NAYES: Councilmen None ABSTAIN: Cculcilmen None ABSENT: Councilmen None (~AiQ /(: (. ATTE?7 ~ ~dJ-~($r City Ierk ... STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chulo Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of RESOLUTION NO. 10424 ,and that the lICIme has not besn amended or repealed. DATED City Clerk (seal) CC-660 ICY!"Z- Y I''---'V'-VI.LV'' I1V. I........ .. 'V \"..................., RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF THE REVISED TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT 77-10, HUDSON VALLEY ESTATES III WHEREAS, Poletta Sue Hudson submitted a revised tentative subdivision map to subdivide 3.38 acres located between Second Avenue and the extension of Las Flores Drive, north of "0" Street, into 15 R-l lots, and I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a public hearing to consider said revised tentative map, and notice of said hearing, with its purpose, was given by the publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least 10 days prior to the date of said hearing, and WHEREAS, a hearing was held at said time and place, namely 7:00 p.m., March 11, 1981 in the Council Chambers, City Hall, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission certified the environmental impact report, EIR-78-1, on the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. From the facts prE!sented to the Planning Commission, the Commission finds that the revised subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 77-10, Hudson Valley Estates Ill, is consistent with the General Plan for Chula Vista as follows: a. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposed development conforms to all standards established by the City for such project. b. The design of the subdivision will not affect the existing improve- ments--streets, sewer, etc.--which have been designed to avoid any serious health problems. 3. Approval of the project will not adversely affect the public service needs of residents of the city or available fiscal and environmental resources. 4. The subdivision is consistent with the General Plan Elements as fo 11 ows : 1) Land Use Element - The General Plan designates this site for Medium Density Residential development (4-12 dwelling units per gross acre). The proposed project density of 4.4 dwelling units per acre is consistent with this designation. ~cR~1 2) Circulation Element ~ The development will extend Las Flores Drive in conformance with General Plan standards. r~ 3) Housing Element - The project should provide decent housing in a well-ordered residential neighborhood. 4) Conservation, Open Space, and Parks & Recreation Elements - None of the areas proposed for conservation or open space on the various plan diagrams of the General Plan are affected by the subject proposal. The developer will be assessed fees in lieu f , of park land dedication. 5) Noise Element - The project will not be subjected to unusual noise levels. 6) Seismic Safety and Safety Elements - The development is not adjacent to any known fault systems. Extension of public improvements, right of way widths, and turn-a rounds meet or exceed safety element standards. Although a portion of the property is within the Sweetwater Val lye 100 year flood plain, the preliminary grading plan indicates the lots will be elevated above said flood level. 7) Scenic Highways Element - The site does not abut a Scenic Highway or gateway. 8) 8icycle Routes - No bidycle routes are proposed on or adjacent to this site. 9) Public Buildings Element - Public buildings are neither proposed nor required on the site. 2. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that the revised tentative of Hudson Valley Estates Unit No.1, Chula Vista Tract 77-10, be approved, subject to the following conditions: a. The developer shall be responsible for acquiring and dedicating right-of-way for Las Flores Drive to 12 feet east of its centerline (as shown on the tentative map) between the north and south boundary of the project. b. The developer shall grant to the City a 10 foot wide drainage easement between lots 4, 5, 12 and 13 as shown on the tentative map. c. The developer shall be responsible for constructing a 10 foot width of Las Flores Drive immediately west of its centerline from the southerly subdivision boundary to "0" Street. Installation of these ) CJ( ;1.4 improvements shall be coordinated with the deferral granted for property associated with Parcel ~lap 5711. Note: There is an improvement certificate on Parcel Map 7129 covering a portion of the 10 foot widp ,trin wP,t nf thp rpntprlinp J ('()::i ~ -3- d. The developer shall be responsible for constructing the storm drain in Las Flores Drive and offsite drainage facilities from the southern subdivision boundary northward as shown on the tentative map. e. The applicant shall enter into an agreement to participate in an improvement district to insure the installation of utilities and street improvements. In the event an improvement district is not formed, the developer shall be responsible for constructing full street improvements in Las Flores Drive consisting of, but not 1 imited to, pavement, curb and gutter, and sidewalk, a street light and drainage facilities. For that portion of Las Flores Drive adjacent to the subdivision boundary, the developer shall construct Las Flores Drive to 12 feet east of the centerline as shown on the tentative map. f. The lowest habitable floor of each dwelling shall be at least one foot above the 100 year water surface elevation. g. The developer shall construct the temporary cul-de-sac shown on the tentative map. The developer shall acquire and dedicate right- of-way adequate to construct said cul-de-sac. h. The developer shall grant to the City, by grant deeds, one foot control lots as determined by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final map. i. The developer shall file copies of the CC&R's with the County Recorder concurrent with the final map. Said CC&R's shall provide for the responsibility for the maintenance of all common areas, roads and guest parking areas shared under contractural agreement by the property owner of each common panhandle lot. This may be accomplished by the formation of a homeowner's association. j. The panhandle lots are approved in concept, which implies that the lots may be developed provided that' the regulations of the code can be complied with and that additional grading and/or retaining walls may be necessary to build on the lot. k. The driveway locations shall be so spaced as to provide the maximum number of parking spaces at the curb. 1. The common access serving two lots shall be improved to its maximum ~ l..;......+-h IInnn t-ha r1o\lolnnmAnt of nnp nr hnth lot,,-_ m. Development of the panhandle lots shall be subject to the provisions of Section 19.22.150 of the Zoning Ordinance. n. An overall grading plan involving adjacent properties must be approved -by the City Engineer. If, on the final grading plan, any portion of Las Flores Drive will be at a lower elevation than the 100 year flood level, that shall be shown on the final map. ~ , 3. That this resolution be transmitted, along with the revised tentative map, to the City Council, and a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the appl icant. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA this 11th day of March, 1981 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Conmissioners Stevenson, Smith, R. Johnson, Will iams, Pressutti, G. Johnson and O'Neill NOES: None ABSENT: None tl4~'~~ Chairman ATTEST: '?~ ~0/171 ~ - Secretary ! ~-t{ y 19.11.150 Panhandle lOb. tb~ lots. or lots served by an easen{en t- Requirements :luLl conditions. A. Panhandle lots. Ibg lots or lots served by an easement rroposed within J subdivision shall meet the ~ritcria cOl1tJincd in this section. B. No lot Jll;jY bt.' cn:akd Of lkvelopcd unuer this provic.;jC)J1 which could ntherwise be served by a pubh..: street unless upproved by the director of planning and the city engillc;'t'r. C. All Jcvt:lopmL'llr rermitkJ under this provision shall be suhject to the regulations and requirements of this title except as otherwise regulatc'd in this section. D. The JiVlSiull of JIlY propL'rry tinder this provision shall be subject to the re"ulations of the State M.lp Act UIllJ SUbuivision Oruill3nce of the city. E. Not more tl13n four lots serveu by a privute road or easement Slt31l be allowed under this provision unless this restriction is waived by the director of planning or city council. F. The responsibility for the muintenance and cost of maintenance of all common areas. roads or easements and guest parking areas sholl be shared under contractual agreement by the property owner of each lor: this sholl be accomplished through the fonna!ion of a homeowner's association. G. Developmen t criteria: l. Rood and easement widths sholl be 3S follows: o"e lot, fifteen feet: two or more lots. twenty feet. These widths may be increased if it is detennined by the director of planning thut u sidewulk is required. 2. All driveways. guest parking areas an'd roadways shall be paved with a minimum of five inches of portland concn.' te cemen t. . 3. Each lot shull contuin an urea not less than the minimum lot size of the under- lying Zone exclusive of all private rO:j(js. common areas :md guest parkin!! areas. 4. All onsite utilities shull be ~ under- groundeu. 5. Euch dwelling shall be connecteu to u gravity sew~r unless otherwise appro\'~d by the city engineer. 6. An onsite fire hydr;Jnt may be required by the lire uepartment when such is deemed necessary. 7. Guest parkin'g sholl be provided 3S follows: one lot, one space; two lots. three spuces: three lots, five spaces; four lots. six spaces. The individual driveways to the garage .shall not be construed as meetino o the guest parking requirement. 8. Accessory structures sholl not be located closer than ten feet to any dwelling locuted on udjacent property. 9. The following setbacks shull be observed: u. Front Yurd. Fifteen feet from any access drive and guest parking areas; b. Any garage facing an access drive shall be u minimulll of twenty-two feet from the drive. c. Side Yard. Not less thun thut required by the lInderlyin;; zone: U. Rear Yard. Not less than that required by the underlying zone upon initial construction. 10. A minimum Jive-foot-high fence sholl be provided on each side of the privute drive behind the front setback and on those property lines abutting adjoining properties. This requirement may be modified or waived by the' director of pJonning if it is found that said fence is not necessary for the protection of the adjoining properties. II. If the property is graded to creute a building pad for each lot, the minimum level area (no slope over five percent) of each put! shall be not less than eighty percent of the minimum lot size of the unJerlying zone, but in no case shall the minimum 3r~a be less th3J1 five thousand square feet. Developmen t proposed on existing natural topography, having an averJge natur31 slope of ten percen t or gre;H\~r, and \I,.'ith less th:1n ten percent of the site to be gruued. shull be subject to the uppro",,1 of the director of pl:mning, who shall consilh.'r whether st!ch d~velopl11ent will :.1\,Jverscly affect adjacent propc..'nies or ut'velopment. 12. Guest parking areas shall be adequately scrt.'ened from onsite :.mu Jujacent resid~lltial propertks. H. No gar:..lge conversions shall be pemlined. l. Development shull be subject to site plan and architectural approval of the din.:ctor of pbnlling, <Ord. 1868 ~ 1 (pur!), 1979.) IOL(';J. ~ . " r I L 226' -- . r;: 0 0 @ 51 <:i 0) ~ 08.0' . - <> 108./2' 0 I 0 . ;8 g 0 b ~ Ii ,. . ...-= -, 0 ~ ~ I @ 0 0 Q I ~ Q: 1:15./2 90.0' Cj , ~ @ " (2) <:i gs ~ " ~ ~'--'= .r--; 0 9 tI) 0) ~ 0 ~ I ..,J I 1361Z 90'0' , I @l 0- ~_ 0 51 "----== ()'" ~.O Q 0 . 0 ~ ~ ~ -. '''9OCJ' 107'.~' \ ..:~6 .0 ~ (HUDSON VALLEY NORTH ( ESTATES ) EXHIBIT A PCS-77-IO ) /5 SINGLe fi/:l.MILY DWeLLINGS /00 Block of Las Flores Dr. CA. ~ - j - \ - ----\ \ \ ., - - '- >.1 - - \ d . -i" - \ _-\ - --..:..--~ ---,. -- - - _ - '- - :'0 ~ - - _ "i..... - ~ - - - - - - .:, - - SFD - ,- -'L. \ \ - - -. - VALLEY EST) ) LOCATOR pcs- 77-10 15 SINGLE FoAM t:Nr'lZLL11VGS 100 SLDCK ~S FLORES DR. ..... .. ..,;"".,,'. :~i~~~" ;"!:;)(: , - ',-.,~ (HUDSON 100' 200. ( . I . . NORTH . ,10'" ,_. . .,'" ",~;'~;;. ,""'}..J......~<.l {' ',:;".,;