HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1980-10371
/ <<. &iU j-
RESOLUTION NO. 10371
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA ADOPTING AMENrMENT TO THE EL RANCHO DEL REY
SPECIFIC PLAN
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council on December 16, 1980 conducted
a public hearing to consider an amendment to the El Rancho del Rey
Specific Plan known as the East: "H" Street Development Program,
marked as Exhibit "A" and attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference as if set forth in full, and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after taking testimony in
consideration of said amendment, voted to approve the amendment
known as the East "H" Street Development Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista that the El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan
be, and the same is hereby amended to incorporate therein the East
"H" Street Development Program as shown in Exhibit "A".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City
of Chula Vista be, and she is hereby authorized and directed to
forward a certified copy of this resolution to all property owners
within the El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan area. .
Presented and Approved as to form by
:::~ocnnY
ADOPTED AND APPROVED
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this
198 1 , by the following vote,
by the CITY
6th day of
to-wit:
COUNCIL of the CITY OF
January
AYES:
Councilmen Scott, Gillow, Hyde, Cox, McCandliss
NAYES:
Councilmen None
None
Councilmen
ABSENT:
cu~ ~t~
17 t't. ~ _~.d Mayor of the City of Chula Vista
ATTES~.t:i""-'?E?-.~~
~ City Clerk t1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA)
I, , City Clerk of
the City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the
above is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No.
and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED
City Clerk
_."
EXH\B\1
A
EAST "H" STREET
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Proposed Amendment to
El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan
November 20, 1980
Prepared by:
The Chula Vista Engineering Department
and
Project Design Consultants
~ -/(;:37'/
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO
EL RANCHO DEL REY SPECIFIC PLAN
EAST "H" STREET
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
PURPOSE
It is the desire of the City of Chula vista to provide for
an orderly, phased construction of East "H" Street from I-
'805 to Otay Lakes Road. Funding of this construction is to
be by owners/developers in connection with approved projects
within the area of benefit (See Figure A) and the City.
Initial development of two lanes or four lanes may be
adequate for a majority of the projects within the area
benefited. However, ultimate construction of six lanes must
be provided for in order to meet total City needs.
The purpose of this development program is to provide a
procedure to:
Determine the fair share of East "H" Street
construction required by proposed land development
proj ec ts .
Provide for construction of East "H" Street.
Provide for reimbursement and credits.
Provide for road construction consistent with
development demand.
(NOTE: Both the terms "H" Street and East "H"
Street as used herein refer to that segment of
East "H" Street between I-805 freeway and Otay
Lakes Road.)
FAIR SHARE
Determination of Benefit
In the past, it was common to assess street construction by
area of benefit. The adjacent areas presumably benefit to a
greater degree than non-adjacent parcels. Properties
fronting on the street would generally be directly
responsible for curb, gutter, sidewalk and 20 feet of paving
adjacent to their developed frontage.
!657(
In some instances, street facilities have been financed
under general obligation bonds wherein properties were
charged on the basis of their assessed value.
Development of "R" Street is not proposed to be financed by
assessment district or bond issue. A precise calculation of
benefit or even of cost, usually required for an assessment
or reimbursement district is not practical for "R" Street
because of the flexible densities, open space areas and
numerous variables inherent in the Specific Development Plan
for El Rancho del Rey. Instead, it is proposed that a
methodology based on "assigned benefit" as described herein
be utilized to provide for the construction of the subject
segment of East "R" Street.
The City has expressed its intention to participate to the
extent of the cost of two lanes, plus one-half the median
cost. It has further expressed its intent to supplement
that participation with the amount of $224,000 which it
normally would have contributed relative to the construction
of East "R" Street through the Rice Canyon SPA.
Participation of existing developments towards the cost of
the existing segments of East "R" Street has not been on a
uniform or equitahle basis. This program makes no provision
for adjustment or further participation in order to correct
that situation either by the owners of developed properties
or by the City.
Average Daily Traffic
A desirable goal in determining benefit or construction
requirements for a development in the "R" Street area is the
establishment of a single figure, say lineal feet of "R"
eStreet, that should be constructed when a single family
residence or an apartment building or commercial development
is approved for construction. Using figures for average
daily traffic (ADT) which have been accepted by the City of
Chula Vista (See Tables 2 & 6), a traffic oriented
relationship can be developed through several calculations
that result in an equivalent length of street for which any
specific land use is responsible (See Table 6).
The total of the average daily trips projected for a
specific land use will not necessarily travel on "R" Street.
Several of these trips will likely be home to school, visits
to neighbors or other trips that do not require traveling on
"R" Street. A precise (if not absolutely accurate)
calculation of the trips which will actually use "H" Street
could not be determined until a precise plan of the dwelling
units, businesses and access roads is established. Even
then, the calculations for ultimate development would not
accurately reflect use of "R" Street during phased
/637(
construction as new access points and destinations become
available. To avoid that Catch-22 situation, the use of
total average daily traffic for future as well as existing
land uses is recommended as the basis of determining
benefit/construction requirements.
Area of benefit is shown on the attached "H" Street
Development Plan (Figure A). The western limit is along the
easterly side of the Rice Canyon SPA and the eastern limit
is at Otay Lakes Road. The southern limit generally follows
the south leg of Rice Canyon and extensions thereof. The
line is also the northerly boundary of the Telegraph Canyon
Road Reimbursement District(s) being proposed by the City of
Chula Vista. The northerly limit is the north boundary of
El Rancho del Rey.
It can be readily seen on the plan that each parcel will not
have equal access to "H" Street. It is proposed however,
that each similar unit would have the same obligation for
construction of "H" Street.
Land Uses
The land use for each SPA (Specific Planning Area) or
project shown on the development Plan (Figure A) has been
detailed in Table 1. This table includes existing, as well
as proposed developments.
Estimated Trips
Using the estimated or actual number of dwelling units or
acres of commercial or special uses such as churches, the
estimated average daily traffic generated by or attracted to
each land use was calculated by the trip generation factors
used by the County of San Diego for Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fees (Policy J-24) (See Table 8).
The results of these calculati~ns have been established on
, .
Table 2. .,," ,.
..
Construction Standard Factors
The cost per lineal foot for constructing "8" Street will
vary considerably. It will be affected somewhat by the
width but more significantly by grading and drainage. The
costs per reach shown on Table 3 are not precise. Also the
cost for one specific portion of a particular reach may be
more or less than another portion 100 or 200 feet away. The
limits of each reach were chosen as practical limits of
expected phase construction. It is recommended that the
limits of each reach be fixed as shown on the Development
Plan.
/0,1 J
The cost figures are for comparison purposes and are not
intended to be used in determining actual costs. They were
developed to arrive at the "Length Factor" or factor that
one reach costs in relation to another. The factor was then
multiplied times the actual length of each reach to
determine an equivalent length of street using the average
cost ($351.23) as a standard.
Required Contruction
For planning purposes and evaluating this proposed
procedure, Table 4 was prepared to show the estimated length
of "R" Street which each SPA or proj ect should be
responsible for. Calculations were made using factors
developed in Table 3. Existing construction is excluded and
the calculations do not assume reimbursement by the City or
other sources for existing property owners who did not
contribute to construction of this arterial.
POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION PHASING
Phased Construction
Another goal in construction of "R" Street is the early
extension from 1-805 to Otay Lakes Road to provide more
convenient access to Southwestern College and adjacent
developments. Even though six lanes will be required for
the ultimate traffic loadings, the precise construction to
be undertaken at any given time (2, 4 or 6 lanes) will be
determined on the basis of traffic projections made at the
time of determination.
In order to construct the most road for the money with the
least impact on planned adjacent projects, the following
phased construction as shown on the Development Plan (Figure
"A") is recommended:
Phase I
Grade half width of right-of-way, install
partial storm-drain facilities as required,
pave 28.5 feet width.
Phase I I
Complete grading and storm drain facilities,
pave an additional 28.5 feet width and
complete the median together with left turns
and intersection paving, street lights,
median landscaping.
Phase III
Complete construction of additional lanes,
curb, gutter and sidewalk.
":j-t, :j, 7
1(!)771
~~
~~~~
Length Factor Calculation
The Length Factor calculated in Table 5 for each reach can
be used in determining the extent of required improvements
that a proposed proj ect might be responsible for in the
future. For instance, a 200 unit medium density project
that will generate 1,800 average daily trips (200 x 9) would
be responsible for 348 equivalent lineal feet of "H" Street.
This might be (using standard lengths from Table 5)
satisfied by construction of 787 lineal feet of Phase I
construction in Reach 3. (348:- 0.442 = 787). If Phase I
construction had already been completed, it might then be
determined, in concert with City staff, that 1,045 lineal
feet of Phase II widening should be constructed in Reach 5
(348 :- 0.333 = 1,045).
priorities
1. Reach J and 2. Construction of the most westerly
portion of "H" Street will begin in the near future
with development of Hidden Vista Village (Rice Canyon
SPA). Initially four lanes of Reach 1 and two lanes of
Reach 2 will satisfy residential traffic demands.
These two reaches and Rice Canyon SPA have been
excluded from this Development Program. Construction
will be coordinated by the City to accommodate phased
development. The City share of Reach 1 and 2
improvements has been estimated at $224,000 and will be
used in phased construction of Reaches 3-5.
2. Reach 3. It is recommended that Paseo del Rey between
East "H" Street and East "J" Street be constructed
concurrently with the construction/completion of Phase
I of East "H" Street from I-805 Freeway to paseo del
Rey. Such construction in total will complete a vital
circulation loop. It is anticipated that Phase I in
Reach 3 will be developed through efforts of the City,
Otay Municipal Water District and others.
3. Reach 4. It is anticipated that the Phase I
construction will be developed by efforts of the City,
Otay Water Municipal Water District and others.
4. Reach 5. It is anticipated that Phase I in Reach 5
will be developed through efforts of the City and
others.
Reach 6 has been constructed to its ultimate width from
Otay Lakes Road westerly past Buena vista Way. A Phase
II extension of "H" Street westerly to paseo Ranchero
(Reach 5) and construction of Paseo Ranchero from "H"
Street to Telegraph Canyon Road would significantly
improve traffic circulation in the east of Chula Vista
loI. ~ /0511
i
~
where the majority of traffic presently passes through
the intersection of Otay Lakes Road and Telegraph
Canyon Road. This construction should be done in
connection with North College and/or"parkside SPA
development.
5. General priorities
! OJ 7/
A. The City shall in all instances have the authority
to determine the phase and reach of improvements
to be installed; the extent of excess
(reimbursable) improvements to be installed;
whether installation may be temporarily deferred;
and/or whether any extent of cash participation
(reimbursement) is then appropriate. In general,
the City shall expedite completion of the total
roadway and/or usable segments thereof.
B. Completion of Phase I in all reaches (3, 4, and 5)
shall be obtained before undertaking Phase II
construction.
C. The roadway shall be adequate to safely accomooate
projected traffic loadings (including prior and
then-currently proposed developments) at all
times. When tentative maps and/or plans for
properties situated easterly of ERDR are approved,
said approval shall include a requirement that a
traffic study be completed to detemine the traffic
impact on East "H" Street. If the traffic study
indicates that the proposed development will
require additional widening of East "H" Street
between I-80S and Otay Lakes Road or would require
additional widening by a development within ERDR
beyond its normal responsibility, then in that
event the proposed development easterly of ERDR
shall be required to construct the required
improvements to East "H" Street and shall be
reimbursed by subsequent oevelopment within ERDR.
The City Engineer shall determine such adequacy
giving full consideration to the total system of
streets serving the area.
Based upon its evaluation of then-current traffic
demands, the City may require installation of
improvements to an extent which exceeds the
normally required improvement of a developer.
Such excess improvements shall be reimbursable by
subsequent developers whose participation in any
extent is in the form of cash.
D.
Phase III improvements may generally be designated
to be placed along the East "H" Street frontage of
1&
"..~
adjacent developments. phase III improvements
required of developments not adjacent to East "H"
Street may be specified to be installed along
"open space" frontage.
REIMBURSEMENT AND CREDITS
Reimbursement
If the City, a developer, or developers build more of "H"
Street than required, based on a trip generation.
calculation, they shall be reimbursed by those subsequent
developers whose participation is in the form of cash.
Reimbursement shall be for the total cost of the facility
(as verified by the City Engineer) plus simple interest of
seven percent (7%) (including one percent to cover City
administrative and handling expense in the collection of
such fund s) all as prov ided in Chapte r 15.50 of the Chul a
vista Code. Interest shall commence effective upon the date
when all of the following have been accomplished:
1. the reimbursable improvements have been accepted by the
City, and
2. a statement of costs for the reimbursable improvements
has been submitted to the City Engineer by the
developer, and
3. the City Engineer has certified that the statement is
accurate, appropriate and in accordance with the
concept of the East "H" Street Development Program.
The reimbursable improvements having the earliest date of
acceptance shall be first reimbursed. When that earliest
reimbursable amount has been paid in full the next oldest
reimbursement agreement from within the total area of
benefit shall be reimbursed, etc.
The city's Director of Finance shall establish a "Public
Improvement Reimbursement Trust Fund" specifically for the
East "H" Street Development Program. His records shall
clearly depict the total amount subject to reimbursement,
the date of acceptance and a tally of principal and interest
payments collected.
The maximum term of reimbursement following acceptance of
improvements shall be twenty years.
ered its
In general, phase I is to be completed prior to initiating
Phase II construction and Phase II completed prior to
/017/
.. ,~.,~~.....-
initiating Phase III construction and/or permitting cash
(reimbursement) partie ipa tion.
However, it may be impractical to construct very small
segments of the project (i.e., 100 linear feet), or stop
short of an intersection by a short distance, or build large
drainage facilities in conjunction with a short segment of
roadway. In such instances, the developer may request that
his participation be in the form of cash. If prior
construction exists for which reimbursement is due, then the
cash participation shall be based upon such amount due. If
no such prior reimbursable construction exists, then the
participation shall be in the amount of the estimated cost
for the "deferred" improvements as approved by the City
Engineer. Cash participation for deferred improvements
shall be utilized by the City in conjunction with the first
subsequent development along East "H" Street which affords
the potential of reasonable unit prices for the items of
work involved.
Acceptance by the City of the estimated cost of deferred
improvements shall release the developer of such prop~rty
from further obligation to participate relative to that
property. Any excess amounts remaining shall be deposited
in the special ERDR Excess Participation Fund.
With each development, a specific length of construction
will be required. If more is constructed for practical
reasons or desire of the builder, he may request credit for
the excess work which will be usable in fulfilling the
requirements of other subdivisions built by him requiring
construction of that reach.
Increased Density
If final developments of a project or Sectional Planning
Area results in additional dwelling units or commercial
acreage, the number of average daily trips from the area of
benefit may increase. Any additional units or areas which
generate trips in excess of the total (38,594) "assessable"
trips specified in Table 2 shall be assessed the then-
current cost of proportionate required improvements (as
estimated by the City Engineer).
The total amount shall be reserved by the City in a special
ERDR Excess participation Fund which shall be used in the
following order of priority:
1. To reimburse the City for its required amount of
improvements (two lanes plus one-half the median cost
or equivalent thereof);
2. To maintain the East "H" Street facilities constructed
under this program;
I
1037/
-
3. To construct street facil ities along "open space"
frontage or other roadways within the ERDR benefitting
area.
Development Conditions
Development in any portion of the benefitting area (Figure
"A") shall be permitted only on condition that the then-
existing improvement (to East "H" Street plus new ERDR area
roadways) as may ex ist, PLUS assured improvements as may be
required (to East "H" Street and new ERDR area roadways) are
adequate to meet the travel demands of then-existing
development plus the proj.ected traffic increase.
The projected traffic increase shall include that from the
proposed development within the benefiting area AND that
from other approved projects for properties situated
easterly of ERDR.
The determination of adequacy of the street system shall be
mad e by the Ci ty Eng inee r .
City Requirement
The City of Chula Vista will participate in the construction
of "H" Street by widening two lanes and paying for one half
the street lighting and one half of the median cost. The
construction may be by the developers and the City will
reimburse them on a per lineal foot basis in accordance with
the equivalent length of "H" Street construction paid by the
developer. The .Ci ty shall annually budget funds at least
sufficient to reimburse developers for improvements
completed in the preceding fiscal year. The lineal foot
rate is $79.00 (see Table 3) and includes the cost for 24
feet of paving ($34.50), construction of one curb ($5.00).
Eight feet of landscaped median ($12.00), one half the
street 1 ighting ($4.50) and $224,000 for Reach 2
improvements divided by 9,640 feet or about $23.25 per
lineal foot.
It is anticipated th.at the City of Chula Vista may construct
the Phase I improvements using available highway funds.
These are estimated to cost $1,170,000 and be the
construction equivalent of 3,326 lineal feet which compares
with 2,168 feet required. Construction of El Rancho del Rey
(Unit 6), Otay Municipal Water District and others is
expected to reduce the City portion of Phase I construction.
! 037/
-~-
<..
"H" STREET DEVELOPMENT
TABLE 1
LAND USES
(Existing or Proposed Dwelling Units or Acres)
Very Low Low SFD Med. Med-High High
Land Use 1-2/Ac. 2-3/Ac. 3-5/Ac. 6-10/Ac. 11-18/Ac. 19+/Ac. Camm. School
SPA or Project
PROPOSEO PROJECTS
Del Centro SPA 473 298 500 K-6
La Canada SPA 477 480 94 K-6
Del Rey SPA 352 283 K-6
N. College SPA 160 177 98
SW College Commercial 1.03
H Street Commercial 8.544
Ridgeback Commercial 2.097
McMilli n Condo 94
Subtota 1 477 473 1. 290 960 286 11. 671
EXISTING PROJECTS
EROR #1 Part 120
EROR #2 96
Gersten Off; ce 2.4
R;dgeback ~1edical 2.4
Southwestern College Call.
Bonita Vista Jr. High Jr. Hi.
Candlewood 125
Subtota 1 --'J ---"-- . ......ill.. --D..... --'L- --1L- ..L8.-
TOT AL 477 473 1,631 960 286 0 15.471
(1) SFO Single FalTlily Detached Homes
(2) SPA Specific Planning Area
J D3 7 (
--
0
vJ "H" STREET DEVELOPMENT
"4 TABLE 2
AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS (1)
Very LO\1 Low SFD Med. ~1ed. Hi gh High Neigh. Off.
LAND USE 1-2/Ac. 2-3/Ac. 3-5/Ac. 6- 1 0 lAc. 11-18/Ac. 19+/Ac. Comm. Comm. TOTAL
-
TRIPS/DU/AC 10.1 10.1 10.1 9.0 6.0 6.0 481/Ac. 359/Ac.
SPA(l) or Project
Del Centro 4,777 3,010 4,500 12,287
La Canada 4,818 4,848 564 10,230
Del Rey 3,555 2,547 6,102
N. College 1,616 1,593 588 3,797
51, Co 11 ege Comm. 495 495
H Street Commercial 4,110 4,110
Ridgeback Commercial 1,009 1,009
McMillin Condos' 564 564
- -' - -
SUBTOTAL PROPOSED 4,818 4,777 13,029 8,640 1,152 564 5,614 0 38,594
ERDR #1 Part 1,212 1,212
ERDR #2 970 970
Gersten Office 862 862
.
Southwestern College 3,700
Ridgeback Medical 862 862
Bonita Vista Jr. Hi. 400
Ca nd 1 eVlOod 1,263 ,- 1,263
SUBTOTAL EXISTING 0 0 3.445 0 0 ---D... 0 1.724 9.2..Q9..
TOTAL 4,818 4,777 16,474 8,640 1,152 564 5,614 1,724 47,863
(1) Based on existing or proposed land uses and the trip generation factor per dwelling or acre based on County
of San Diego Bridge and Thoroughfare Trip Generation Factors (Policy J-24).
"-.
D
'v,j
~
-.........
REACH(l) LENGTH
1 By Others
2 By Others
3 2,433
4 5,807
5 1,400
6 Exi s t.
7 By Others
TOTAL 9,640
"H" STREET DEVELOPMENT
TABLE 3
"H" Street Construction Standard
(Based on January, 1980, Construction Unit Price)
GRADING $(2)
PAVING $(3)
CITY
PORTION(4)
LENGTH
FACTOR
EQUIV.
LENGTH
DRAINAGE(2)
$/LF
170
75
75
79
79
79
100
45
20
1.330
.903
.831
3,235
5,241
1,164
467
317
292
118
118
118
351.23 Avg. 1.00 9,640
City Participation = $79 portion; 351.23 Avg. x 9,640 lineal factor = 2,168 lineal feet
Remaining Length = 9,640 - 2,168 = 7,472
H Street Construction Standard = Remaining Length = 7,472 = 0.1936
ADT (Table 2) 38,594
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Reach as shown on "H" Street Development Plan
Projected cost in dollars per lineal foot of completed street.
Cost for paving, curbs, gutter, sidewalks, street light and landscaped median (except City portion (Note 4)
and $224,000 Rice Canyon participation divided by 9,640 feet or about $23.25 per lineal foot).
City portion includes 24 feet paving, 1 curb, 1/2 street light &nd 8 feet landscaping.
Factor that a particular reach costs related to average $351.23.
"--
o
vJ
~
--
"H" STREET DEVELOPMENT
TABLE 4
Required Construction (1)
Requi red
ADT Cons tructi on
SPA or Project (Table 2) (% 0.1936)
Del Centro 12,287 2,379
La Canada 10,230 1,981
De 1 Rey 6,102 1,181
N. College 3,797 . 735
S\. College Commercial 495 96
H Street Commercial 4,110 796
Ridgeback Commercial 1,009 195
McMillin Condo 564 109
38,954 7,472
(1)
Required construction as determined by multiplying ADT (Table 2) by the Construction Standard (Table 3)
'"""-
5
--...l
-
"H" STREET DEVELOPMENT
TABLE 5
Phased Construction Value
(1)
TOTAL
LENGTH FACTOR
.PHASE I .PHASE II .PHASE III
REACH
LENGTH
VALUE PER LINEAL FOOT
PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III
By Others
2 By Others
3
4
2,433
5,807
1,400
5
6 Exist.
7 By Others
TOTAL/ 9,640
(AVERAGE)
Phase I Construction:
Phase II Construction:
Page III Construction:
247
142
117
65
65
467
0.442
0.185
0.185
TOTAL
1.330
0.903
0.831
1.00
(1) A value is assigned to each lineal foot of phased development by dividing the stated value per lineal foot of
each phase and reach by $351.23, the average total cost per lineal foot. Total length factor is the same as
shown on Table 3.
155
110
110
($121.36)
($164.87)
0.703
0.313
0.313
317
0.405
0.333
0.185
65
292
($65)
($351.23)
(0.345)
(0.469)
(0.185)
Partial grading and drainage, pave 2 lanes.
Pave additional 2 lanes, street light, median landscaping, complete grading, drainage.
Pave remaining lanes (total 6 or 8), curb, gutter, sidewalk.
"-
C)>
vJ
--4.
..........
"H" STREET DEVELOPMENT
TABLE 6
STANDARD LENGTH REQUIREMENTS
AVERAGE STANDARD
LAND USE DAILY TRIPS LENGTH (1)
Very Low, l-2/Acre 10.1 per Lot 1. 96 per du
Loi-I, 2-3/Acre 10.1 per Lot 1.96 per du
Single Family, 3- 5/ Acre 10.1 per Lot 1.96 per du
~ledium Density, 6-l0/Acre 9.0 per Unit 1.74 per du
Medium High, 11-18/Acre 6.0 per Unit 1.16 per du
High Density, 19+/Acre 6.0 per Unit 1.16 per du
Neighborhood Commercial 481 per acre 93.12 per acre
Office Commercial 359 per acre 69.50 per acre
''''!
(1)
Standard length per dwelling unit or commercial acres was determined by multiplying the H Street
Construction Standard (0.1936 per Table 3).
'-
C>
v.J H STREET DEVELDPMENT
~ TABLE 7
POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION PHASING
(SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS)
CONSTRUCT I ON -TOTAL
EQUIV. LENGTH LENGTH CONST.
REACi-l PHASE LENGTH LENGTH DEVELOPMENT DU ADT TOT ADT REQUIRED REQUIRED EQUIV.
3-5 9,640 3,326 City Portion 2,168 2,168 3,326
L & L Apts. 57 342 342 66 2,234 3,326
McMi 11 i n Condo 94 564 906 109 2,343 3,326
5 2 1,400 466 H St Com'l 4,110 5,016 796 3,139 3,792
4 Part 2 1,550 628 Misc. 500 5,050 10,066 980 4,119 4,420
4 Pa rt 2 2,297 930 Misc. 500 5,050 15,116 980 5,099 5,350
4 Compo 2 1,960 794 Misc. 427 4,312 19,428 837 5,936 6,144
TABLE 8
County of San Diego, Californla
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POLICY
Subject
Policy
Number
Page
Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fees
J-24
6 of 6
TRIP GENERATION FACTORS
Land Use or Community Plan Category
Residential
Single Family Residential Lot
Multiple Units
(i. e., apt., condos, townhouses, trai ler spaces, etc.)
Duplexes
Generation Factor
(per 24-hr. day)
10.1/1ot
6.0/unit
9.0/unit
Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
General Commercial
Office Commercial
48l.0/A
48T.O/A
359.0/A
Industri al
Light Industrial
Heavy Industrial
Special Uses
lurseries Non-retail
\egional Park
'ark, Developed
ark, Rustic
lementary and Junior High School
arehouse and Storage
Jspital
)ur-Year College
ire Station
lbi 1 e Home Parks
rport
metary
lf Course
urches
gh School and Junior College
9l.0/A
9l.0/A
8.0/A
20.0/A
40.0/A
4.0/A
20.0/A
70.0/A
l4.4/Bed
60.0/A
40.0/A
6.0/Space
3.0/A
4.0/A
4.0/A
10.0/A
40.0/A
[E: Facilities of types not covered will be estimated from San Diego based data if
available.
erences:
IS Action 5/1/73 (92)
/S Action 6/23/77(26)
IS Action 1/8/80 (6)
'c:J ?7/
__.~~.~l'i~_~-
~,
"",2-
-.
ct
4>>
(I
.
.
. ~ ~.
. . . .
-~.,,~.._._,. ",..'~,...,
-
~-
.,
"
n
o
L
m
()
--l
o ~ i ; ~ ~ Q ! e ;I >-",,l.S>I';'>-" 1
:; : .[ I 1 ~ , , : ! .I~ : 1-"1l".,,'?,;~..,._......l~C~~
","~,,~",90 ",091 ,~~..!
c-.~/\~""t~rl~~E .../ ~ ""-' !
f F' ~ ~ I; ;. ~ ~ ~ " I I....... ~ ;":'/, j-'-'-: '6>
: ~ " ~ J i j , f ! 1" f" .' ?/,. I \~1
~ ; H HI; /:1-- .. /(:/ i U,::f/ '" ...-.-! \\\'~
~ J~ ~,,,i:. / : f' :
,~ '" !j , CI \
o ; J \ I ~ ~ ri ~
""0~.'...-._m--'''A''''''''-f' -f:J:''''''''!;> J ~""'I" I ! \
." to ."i" ." ,
;,/ &",:' 1 ~ 1:~ ~
y.<:, Y1 $;'::;) .."""""" to :
,!!1.7 ~~ .f/ I ~,'{.....liJ.(j....." '''~'''''''''''''''''"" \ ~
~~.' ff - f': ~... . '''''''I'''' J :
,.t./ .' ~ /-f'/ /?'.8 ~ \ ~ """"",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1.
~;7 \", J ,t"'~"'O~5 i >1 :~
l>.' \ t (/" 0 3 ; ,;
~/ \:K'/ n~y~ ,;;:/ \ ii
1:/ . \ \ f 1..~/y=P f1J~(. ! l~
f)C"~'~'..../ \~YI /l/C.:~ If . II I : (!!
t! r' ...."'<,. \r"/'~)! J! !j,! ' Ii
&,L_..._...i"',~<":.<; II. '/il ( () Iii f j r-.~' (Ii~
Z' ! "'..~/'fi{ ,fl" '\ II ;'
51 ; Jr.. S:\ \ -, ~:./J r2 1 \:~
ri-) i.~1( i7 \ \\~~ "f ~~! i! ~>,O
"~ (/Y.,' j \"'0 ' I "i, f' i~ f'
~)\ ...__.. ": f I! \t. . f 0 i' il
, ~ . (',! ~1. \ I '0'1-
l .. . if ':.. I ,,('
.,~"'; 1',. -- A\ I M'
, /S.... ," "..... i ,... \! .$,'t
, ..... II "'~" " e: \' ",""<l>
\.;'.'''\' r/ ~~ r";;;'::. {j \ i "~~~"",'(! "
. I ---.~~_n..n_.,,",,:"'..~ '-<, \ : I Ii If ~'!>'.
\ I : II ~: .~;;';~/ U J fl,v
\\ I \\ . 1 ?,:. \ .......'~..Il ~t:o :t
,\ 'r........ ~.. - ,c _L...... '-" ! \ '....n.. #';; $
\r~~~l"'''''-'i ' ~ \.-t~\. g2 y\ ,i {~ !~ il ~ ~~
\,\ '''''I\. \-, Ff\ It\\ l'l i 1-" g ~ - ............
.~ "'-..:::=::;:;=~ :.\~ 1 .t,\j:
'. __...._n.._...._____.._ ~.. ':\ '\'"........ ~ , . I'
\\ \ ! \ i ':,!& "i~~l ~;.~""'... ...........::.......-......:;':--.--/..-............)
,~ :" :. t,'" \ . ,. :
~ I " ~ --....-..:J.- ~\ I' j
i., \ i ... ~ H \15:>: "T~~~-.<(="'\v/ I !
\~.'\~ '--'~'I \~. '~'A~L~J~~ 1i:1~, q~~\] \' ~ y /cY\ "l..~/~) !
~0. \ I\" ~~ !---.- #' ,~:
,'! \, ~'" J:;i"-~"=\'/ ...J'/ !
~ \.:...._...) :.i." i;;. Y- /' c- :
\;\.... .......It''\l- ,f' sl ~~D--ll"'lr;':;'" . /1: )!.....-.....---...-...-.'
r.'y"" : ~ "'~'''/)'' I II \ Y:
~ !' "'1:':~ j 0'1 d' ~ I!~{
\, \ I '.",0" i }' p II IV ,
\l' --( I .~; ,. ,,-.J I /1' /-0j,!
'\"'\_'; ,~ II)' Jri
}t'i ':~'I\ ~ \ I II fit..f' ;/ i
..: ~~:: ..".. '\ '\:. c=l.<..-----J ~.f"";/ -:
"',/-! ."'.'.'" ~,;..~..~:...;:;~..._~.~:::~...._........~::-.::::....................__:.
o f;f;"~'" '~}' ~", 7-~-. \
i' I /)' ..'
.~ 01 ' ( I .
II q / .
~;lI , '<l 2 ~ :S~ I: ,
g ~ J\:' '." ~ SA / ~
,~ /1...," "'" ~ A ~ - '
" ~" ~(~, ~ ""~~;/I)
! I J!.frf ~ i ~~ .I.~~-': .
~ i ~'rl'-
~ ,?:i-. \1
'. 1VH1'
I r ~~~
r-
o
()
'J>
-l
5
Z.
!~"~
.>B ~
~~Il n
~!~ ~
",
~~ ,8 .
~'~ ~I~ /~'
~ ~1{ el
'"01:> -i'~" ~
oe. Iff ~ ~~.
~nl~ ~ 1~ i~\
i!11 3' ..
,
:;
......
-)
ficO!
m
)>
(J)
-i
.
:J:
.
~
JJ
() m
~ m
-<
0 -i
-n
() 0
:I:
C m
r
~ <
< m
en
~ r
() 0
~ i::J
S
m
z
-i
-0
r
)>
Z
-_.~.
"-
o
vJ
'0../'-....\
-
.....
6420202100
RAY l HUFF~AN CON!TRUCTION
2700 ACAHS AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 9211E
HC
'-'
......
592120C600
OTAY LAND COMPANY
C/O THE GERSTEN CC~PANIES
2029 CENTURY PARK EAST 90067
\--A
~-
'.....
6420103700
EL RHCHO DEL R. Y<CORP)
~70 1 ~IL!H IRE BL SUI TE ~O
BEVERLY HILLS CA S 2 ~
5941"304300 /'"
ROLL I~VES_(HENTS
424 STON~RIDGE COLRT
BONITA CA 'S'2002
, ..~
/
-------/-...--.- ...-
!
\ ;if} 4;,~I'
I'V
594120C800
EL RANCHO DEL REY<CDR,R)
C/O THE GERSTEN CC~PA~IES l
2029 CENTURY PARK EAST 90C~7
.....
594130~900
ROLL INVESTMENTS
591 CAHINO DE LA REINA
10
I -SAN DIEGO CA 92108
SUITE ~ .
'. :1,
'-," :.
~ ~'. I .. ,:' ,
. ';-': ~ ~. ~. i :;.'
-~-
.. ..
- - -
:, . .
'\ '. .: :
r
-, I'
; i ~W j: i
"
,
',' r )' .
.;i 'J I .' ~ ;
:', ,I;:'
:i i i\ "-
J,(:,;;
I r
~\ .-
'.t;':",
J':' , ~, ' .
! ~ --
;: ~.//:,:",:.:' ~
:/. ", " ;.-.
. ~:>.;.~<j .,
, '
!
"
/
59413029
SWEETWATER UN1011 flIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
1130 FIFTH AVENUE
CHUAL VISTA CA 92011
55313Q02CO /
OTAY L~OHFANY .
5 70 1 ~ IL S H Ill'E--- B ~ V ~ rJ.V.-l? E
BEVERLY HILLS C~
,.-- ._-~------- .-... .....--..-,--...- .
E420103e00
RC~AN CATHClIC BISHOF
IEGG THEe CCRF)
P C BOX e0428
, SAN DIEGO CA 92138
1010
/
OF SAN 0
:./
~541200200
SAlTZHA~ LCRRAINE FELCMAN ~CRR
U
2022 STONEkOOO ORIV~
SANTA RCSA CA 95404
6420103900 /
PILGRIM EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN C
H UR CH
497 E ST
'. CHULA VISTA CA 92010
,,----.:--.-----.--;---.-------..-..-
5541304C00
BeNITA ~ISTA ASSOCIATES
6526 1/2 EL CAJON BLVOI
SAN DIEGO CA 92115
, -:
_:t.
';.
'" .
-,,,-, t, _
.~ ,T;
'I',
~ ,:llJ~ll
, ":1', \ .
';:: !
;~i
"i1;
-I.;
III
ill
"..\
. ~ ;~1,::
",
.'IL
'-'~
,.',
I ,':.';
. . '.~' .,J:,.'
~;{,:;j~ .
5941302G
SWEETWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
900 OTAY LAKES ROAD
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
64201026
CHUAL VISTA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
, 84 EAST "J" STREET
CHULA VISTA CA ' 92010
'\
,59314013CO
~ILLIAMS JACK E & ~ERTHA C
1790 GCTH~H ST
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
Watt Industries
3737 Camino del Rio South
Suite 309
SD 92108
JEFF- PHAI R
Caldwell Banker
Commercial Real Estate Service
P. 0, Box 2, S D 92138
5941304100
ALBERT CLAYTCN
RT
11 NAPLES !T
CHULA VISTA CA
'....
F JR ENDER AL8E
92011
;.
_ 1f1~'
I~ J( i6
~
j~lijj!'H!L '.
,".i ~..: (, 'f 11,
"I L\:.;;'
:.,~ ..:~} .~.~J'.~.'~:',
-~, 1~~'U~I;'
,.::\ i fri:t~H'~ .
! !l!:~rjW