The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2010/02/23 Additional Information Develepment'Services Department' '. '~If?.' ",', ", . ,~ 'eustomer. ~ervice Survey " .'. " . , .~ Dear Valued Customer: We value and respect our customers and are dedicated to providing you with professional and timely service. To assist us in providing the highest quality customer service, we would appreciate your perspective on the services you recently received with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department. Your candid feedback is an integral part of our efforts to serve you. Please take a moment to complete the attached survey about your experience. Your comments will be used to identify areas of needed improvement and recognize employees for their excellent service. Thank you for taking the time to assist us! Please provide the following information to identify the service area for your project. Date(s) of Service: Time of Service: Customer Type D Contractor/Builder D Homeowner D Public Agency Project Type D Residential D Commercial/Industrial Type of Service Provided D Project Submittal D Plan Review D Building Permit D Inspection D Developer D Business Owner D Other: D Other: D Development & Permit Information D Records D Resolving Code Violation(s) D Other: - - - - TIMELlNES ,. .. ~ ' - ~ ~ Needs Improvement Fair Good Not Excellent Applicable Amount of time you waited to be assisted. Time to complete your transaction. D D D 2 D 2 D 3 D 3 D 4 D 4 D NA D NA STAFF ,'.'.,. . . '. Courteous and professional Knowledgeable D D D 2 D 2 D 3 D 3 D 4 D 4 D NA D NA , . ., SERVICE ' ... . " Provided information in a complete, D 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 D NA accurate and understandable manner Offered additional assistance or options D 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 D NA Online information resources helpful D 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 D NA Met your service needs D 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 D NA Please indicate the name(s) of any staff person(s) you would like to commend: You may also fill out this survey online at www.chulavistaca.gov/City Services/Development Services/Planning Building!. 1 0 a .... --- ..... ---- ~ 1';JT!i :it r() '" 0 ,"-$...;t ~ N -'2 'f2.. J:~~' '" ~ --- " '" 1;.. ,f '" ~ it ~ '" "r' - (S -:.;,' ,J. i >- ~ , ,T ~ , < 1 -< i'O u (S ~ '" "" ~ ~ - ~ > " '" 0 --- ~ u J'l .l:l ~ -.2: ~ r----i- .;; ~ C(l " 2 '" .a -.2: ~ 11 iti.~ , ~~ill ~~ ~ ;; 0 u ~ - "'- , '" J'l ":l ~ ".. t '..;~' <Il '" ~ '" , '" -.,--;, "' ~~ "' ~ r ;:: '" .~ --- ~ .~ ~ ';; - ~ ~ , CL _. :~ .~ !;: .", '" 7)1 5~ "'u "'-'" ~ .?' E '" " .;:::; ~ ~ '" 0.' 'L ........ . . ~ ~ ~ ):;: ~ ~ ;;S u o <ll ~ '" - " ~ '" '" c '" ;: .... '" -::2: -@ ". <ll ;: .>: '" '" '" > cS .", -22 N 0< ;: () ~ "'" -t: '" ~ .~ ;$, \:5 -5 f:::: ~ 1 --- 5 ~. ". -.2: g 0 "'ci '" .~ .- u- ~ 2 ;::: ~ '" ,\:1 :=:: (S "- " ~ N .'t ::..... '" " OPTIONAL Name: Company: Address: Address Correction Required CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEV SERVICES ATTN CUSTOMER SERVICES TEAM 276 FOURTH AVENUE CHULA VISTA CA 91910 We especially value any comments or observations you can share with us. Please feel free to provide any additional comments. Thank you for taking the time to help us improve our service! Comments: "- Would you like to be contacted by someone in Development Services? Yes D No D Customer Information (Optional) Name: Daytime Phone: Address: E-Mail Address: Ifdd..<- 1-7 tnu:zk V rLHTr ^^-<<--~ -d l~- Zh3/; 0 ~." ',/) 'il '. ". . ~ . ~j Odd.;h'ol1..J :::tt/3 'lr-fO r YYl~ 2/23/10 February , 20 I 0 Again, congratulations on your recent appointmen s development at the County, Thank you for recently mee . this subject. On behalf of the City of comment on the Proposed PHA Plan for t Mr. David Estrella, Director Department of Housing & Community Development County of San Diego 3989 Ruffin Rd. San Diego, CA 92123 Dear Mr. Estrella: SUBJECT: Comments Housing Authority Administr- . As you may be aware, the City of Chula Vis providing affordable housing for our citizens. Diego in providing afforda that collaborative effort ~ to help revitalize th. component of both HOME and Redevelopm revitalization comments Pro' , ort the Cou of San Diego's intention to target up to 250 vouchers for Projeet- Based Section . rtificates l' P13C"). We believe the use of Pro;eet-Based Certificates is an . \" J efficient and elTec ",lie ay 0 llding rent restricted units to the housing stock. We also believe that it is an effective wa <II, ederal funding to accomplish multiple public goals. Tn the ease of the City of Chula Vista, w e particularly hopeful of seeing this program assist us in the revitalization of the west side ofCh a Vista. In all, the current draft is acceptable and is supported. We suggest the following minor changes that we think will further strengthen the plan: I) Change the maximum terrn that a Certificate can be Proiect based Ii-om 10 to 15 years. Rationale: The PBCs will effectively increase rents on our targeted affordable units so that a larger terrn loan can be supported on the property, thereby enhancing project teasibility. This minor change will increase lending proceeds by approximately 33% for each such project based unit. In short, the same exact rental dollars will support a 33% larger term loan just because of the increascd term of the rental payments. 2) Allow PRC's to be 100% of a given proiect fDr the lesscr of ] 0 units or 25% of the units instead 01'4 units or 25% of the units. Rationale: This provision is designed to ensure that there is not undue concentration of low- income residents in a given site. Based on our experience with the County's public housing sites and other experience, we do not believe that up to]O 'ts will cause an undue concentration. Moreover, only four certificates on smallcr rcsult in too much administrative and monitoring cost. Ten units is an accepta number in our judgment. Sin 3) Pro' eet Selection Process should be streamlined and offered on an 0 en basis so that a develo concert with funds from the City. be fO 'ram In our own in need of Mitch Thompson Chula Vista Council voiceofsandiego.org I News. Investigation. Analysis. Conversation. Intelligence. - Bargai... Page I of 1 :::>Ll''-' ~ I ,^"","- <...-6""~":<e..-l\,, ..:>",.6~>/IO Bargain Bids on Second Project Under Labor Pact ['",10.1: Fri.!,y. Fd'ru:lfY ]~. ~llllj (dii p'" Foes of a labor pact on the San Diego Unified school renovation hond crowed when bids for the first project under the agreement came in higher than expected. Now fans oflhe labor deal arc doing the same, after bids for the second project under the agreement came in lower than expected. Renovating the automotive shop at Claircmonl High School was estimated 10 cost $4.1 million, bUI the lowesl bid for the contract came in at $2.5 million, according In a schoo] district press release. That pencils out to roughly 40 percent under the estimate. The work has oot yet been awarded, but the company that seems poised to win, Stmight Line General Contractors, is based in Oceanside and is not unionized. Its president, David Williams, said the lahm pact made them uncomfortable, hut they hid anyway hecausc of the lack of work in San Diego County. And that's huoyed the labor pact's advocates. "It de nates the two rnnjor arguments that the opponents were pUlling out: That nOll-union contractors wouldn't bid and that it would raise costs," said Xavier Leonard. a spokesperson for the Center on Policy Initiatives, a labor-friendly think tank that supports the plan. For both sides. il's loa soon lo say thnt the labor deal is driving costs either way. We'll be tracking what happens to costs under the labor agreement over the longer term. -- EMILY ALPERT @ Copyright 2010, \'oiceofs3ndiegu.org, San Diego, CA. Powered by 8]0.'( CMS from TownNcws.Cllm. " hltp://www.voiceofsandiego.org/education/schoolcd/article_663408b2-1 dc5-11 dfc823 1-00... 2/23/2010