HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010/01/12 Item 8
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
~\~ CllY OF
~~ (HUlA VISTA
, January 12, 2010, Item No.: ~
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: PCS-09-02; CONSIDERATION OF AN
APPLICATION FILED BY MILANO GROUP FOR YIH-RUEY CHANG
AND CHAN-YUNG CHANG (APPLICANT) FOR APPROVAL OF A
TENTATNE CONDOMINIUM MAP APPLICATION FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF TWO NEW BUILDINGS AND THE
CONVERSION OF TWO EXISTING MOTEL BUILDINGS, TO
CONTAIN A MIXTURE OF 25 MULTI-FA1\tIILY RESIDENTIAL
CONDOMINIUM UNITS MID SIX NEW COMMERCIAL RETAIL
SUITES.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP SUBJECT TO THE
CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN FOR THE BROADWAY
CONDOMINIUMS PROJECT, TO DIVIDE 0.99 ACRES LOCATED AT
778 BROADWAY INTO 25 MULTI-FNvIILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS
AND ONE COMMERCIAL UNI ITH 6 SUITES.
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY: City Manage 4/5ths Vote: _Yes X No
BACKGROUND
The project site consists of two parcels that are approximately 1 acre in size, located at 778
Broadway, northwest of the intersection of Broadway and K Street in the northwest area of
Chula Vista (See Locator Map, Attachment 1). The project site is currently developed with a
"Best Choice" Motel. On 12/10/09, the Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation (CVRe)
approved the Design Review Permit (DRC-09-17) and Planned Sign Program (PSP-09-02)
applications and recommended that the City Council approve the Tentative Condominium
Subdivision Map, and this decision was not appealed.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the project for compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and prepared a Secondary Study for the project
pursuant to Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PElR) No. 06-0 I for the Urban Core
8-1
Meeting Date: 01/12/10
Page 2
Specific Plan (UCSP). Based on this review, the Environmental Review Coordinator has
determined that the Project was adequately covered under previous PEIR No. 06-01. Thus, no
further environmental review or documentation is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt the attached City Council Resolution approving and establishing
conditions of approval of a Tentative Condominium Subdivision Map for the Project.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
On December 10, 2009, the CYRC considered the recommendations of the Redevelopment
Advisory Committee (RAC), City staff and public testimony and approved the Design Review
Permit and Planned Sign Program, and recommended that the City Council approve the
Tentative Condominium Subdivision Map for the proposed project. The CYRC found the
project site plan, circulation, parking and building design to be consistent with requirements of
the UCSP (See Attachment 3, CYRC Minutes).
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
The proposed project plans were presented to the RAC for their review and public input at the
meetings of May 7, 2009 and July 16, 2009. The RAC members considered the Project's site
design and architecture to be attractive. They were supportive and excited about the Project and
appreciated the applicant's efforts. The project is designed to provide 47 parking spaces,
including 40 multi-family residential spaces and 7 commercial spaces. This complies with the
UCSP parking standards for commercial uses, which is 2 spaces per 1,000 square feet of
commercial space, and for multi-family residential uses, which is 1.5 spaces per unit plus 1 guest
space per 10 units. One RAC member and a member of the public expressed concerns that the
adopted UCSP parking standards would not provide sufficient on-site parking, and could result
in residents parking in adjacent neighborhoods, or in the 2-hour commercial parking zone on
Broadway. Another RAC member felt that residents should be discouraged from parking in the
on-site commercial parking spaces and supported the existing 2-hour commercial parking zone
on Broadway. A member of the public mentioned that the applicant should use the UCSP
standards and suggested that any deviation from the UCSP parking standards be directed to the
Planning Commission. Another member of the public stated that studies have shown that reduced
parking standards have the effect of encouraging people to use the bus or trolley. Staff suggested
that any public concerns about the affect of multi-family residential parking on adjacent
neighborhoods be addressed by the City in conjunction with the future review or amendment of
the UCSP. After additional discussion related to the project's architectural and landscaping
design, and other UCSP standards, the RAC found that the project plans, including parking as
required by the UCSP, to be satisfactory and recommended that they be forwarded to the CYRC
for consideration. (See Attachment 3, RAC Minutes)
DISCUSSION
Site Location and Surrounding Uses:
8-2
Meeting Date: 01/12/10
Page 3
The project site is located at 778 Broadway, northwest of the intersection of Broadway and K
Street in northwestern Chula Vista. The parcels are in the C-2 (Broadway South Corridors) sub-
district of the UCSP. The neighborhood consists of predominantly commercial uses to the east,
south, and north, and existing single and multi-family residential uses to the west. A mixed-use
(commercial/multi-family residential) project is located immediately to the north at 760
Broadway. A description of the surrounding land uses, General Plan, and zoning designations is
outlined below:
I General Plan Designation Zoning Designation I Existing Uses
Site Mixed Use Residential C-2 (Broadway South) Motel
North Mixed Use Residential C-2 (Broadway South) 'Mixed Use -
Commercial/Residential
East Mixed Use Residential C-2 (Broadway South) Commercial
South Mixed Use Residential C-2 (Broadway South) Commercial
Single-Family
West Residential Medium R-l Residential
R-3 Multi-Family
Residential
Proiect Description:
The request is for approval of a Tentative Condominium Subdivision Map to subdivide two
existing lots with a total area of 0.99-acre (43,120 square-feet), into 25 attached multi-family
condominiums, and one retail commercial ownership containing 6 suites. Fifteen 3-bedroom and
ten 2-bedroom multi-family units are proposed (See Attachment 2, Tentative Map/Site Plan).
The proposed project includes a total of 34,825 square-feet, including 31,295 sq. ft. of residential
and garage space, and 3,529 sq. ft. of retail space. The buildings will range from 2-3 stories and
will be a maximum of 35 ft. in height. The project will include private balconies or patios and a
common recreation area including a picnic bench and barbecue for residents. The project's
parking lot has been designed to provide 47 spaces on site, including a mixture of 21 standard-
sized, open stalls, 16 compact stalls, and 10 garage parking spaces. Included in these totals are
the required number of guest (3) and handicapped (2) parking spaces. The project meets the
UCSP requirement of 47 parking spaces. Landscaping will be provided at the base of the
buildings along the western elevation, at the unit entries along the northern elevation, and along
the walkway separating the commercial from the retail buildings. The project includes the
following components:
8-3
Meeting Date: 01/12/10
Page 4
Floor: Souare Feet: Breakdown bv Use:
Ground/first floor 13,118 sq.ft. 3,529 sq.ft. retail
6,584 sq. ft. residential
3,005 sq.ft. garage
1,050 sq. ft. recreation area
37 open parking spaces
10 garage snaces
Second floor 12,992 sq. ft. Multi-family Residential
Third floor 8,715 Sq. ft. Multi-familv Residential
TOTAL 34,825 sq.ft.
Site Design:
The project site is square-shaped and relatively flat. The site has 200 feet of street frontage along
Broadway (lot width) and is 210 feet deep. The proposal is for two, 2-3-story structures located
in the center of the site, which are proposed to cover 35% of the site, and have a floor area ratio
of 81 %. The applicant is proposing to demolish a portion of one of the existing motel buildings
to make way for the future mixed-use building, and also convert the other portions of the motel
building to residential condominium units.
Vehicle access has been separated into two access points, with the access to parking spaces
serving the commercial suites on the south side of the site, and access to parking spaces serving
the residential units on the north side of the site. The driveway will wrap around the perimeter of
the site, and access to the residential parking spaces and garages. The mixed-use retail/residential
building elevation will face eastward toward Broadway, with the main entrances to the retail
suites on the ground floor along the Broadway street frontage. The Broadway street frontage will
be characterized by a 10 foot wide enhanced entry between the retail building and the edge of the
public sidewalk, which will provide opportunity for enhanced paving, benches, planter pots and
landscaping at the base of the buildings adjacent to the unit entries.
Thirteen residential units will be located on the second and third floors of the mixed-use building
and in the building on the north side with multi-family residential units and garages. Twelve
residential units will be located in the converted motel buildings, southwest of the new mixed-
use and multi-residential buildings. The floor plans have been designed so that fifteen three-
bedroom units and ten two-bedroom units are proposed. The size of the residential units ranges
from approximately 825 sq. ft. for the smallest two-bedroom unit, to 1,455 sq. ft. for the largest
three-bedroom unit. The units will have private patios or balconies ranging from 26 sq. ft. to 107
sq. ft. in size. Also proposed is a 1,050 sq. ft. recreation area for residents, conveniently located
in the center of the site. It will contain a barbecue, picnic bench with a trellis roof, and
landscaped play area (See Attachment 2, Tentative Mapl Site Plan).
ANAL YSIS:
Development Standards
The evaluation is based upon the C-2 Broadway South Sub-District of the UCSP Corridors
District. The project's site and building design were reviewed and evaluated based on the
8-4
Meeting Date: 01/12/10
Page 5
development standards and the design and landscaping guidelines of the UCSP. The following
table provides a comparison of the proposed project development standards to the minimum
required development standards for projects within the C-2 District. The project has been
designed within the limits of the development standards.
Urban Core
Specific Plan Proposed Project Standard
Standards (C-2)
Height
45 feet max. 35 feet
Floor Area Ratio:
LOmax .81
Lot Coverage: rvlin.35%
Max. 75% 35%
Setbacks: Min. 10 feet Proposed:
Street Max. 20 feet 10-11 feet
Building Step-back Min.15 ft at building height 01'35 feet Not required ifheight is 35 ft. or less
Street Wall Frontage 50% minimum 63% (approx.)
Parking: Retail (Non-resid.) = 7 Standard (open): 21 spaces
Min. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Garage: 10 spaces
Residential and Non- On-site Min. = 50% Compact: 16 spaces
Residential Parking, Handicap: 2 spaces'
all located on-site. Residential = 37 Guest: 3 spaces'
Min. 1.5 spaces Idwelling unit
On-site min. = 100%
Guest = 3
I spacell 0 dwelling unit
Total Parking Required: 47 spaces Total Parking Provided: 47 spaces
· Included in above total
Storage:
Municipal Code Section 15.56.020 requires that new condominium projects provide storage area
for each unit. The applicant has prepared a storage plan that is included in the project's Design
Review plans. The storage closets are typically provided in hallways, under stairs, in separate
closets located olIthe balcony, or in garages, where provided. The proposed project contains 10
two-bedroom units, which require 200 cubic feet of storage space for each unit, and 15 three-
bedroom units, which requires 250 cubic feet of storage area. The Applicant proposes to provide
8-5
Meeting Date: 01/12/10
Page 6
approximately 200-226 cubic feet of storage in 6 of the 10 two bedroom units, which complies
with the code. The Applicant proposes to provide storage ranging from 254-324 cubic feet of for
9 of the 15 two bedroom units, which also complies with the code. However, due to constraints
such as converting existing motel rooms into condominiums, and limited availability of garages,
the applicant was only able to provide 185 cubic feet of storage in four of the converted 2-
bedroom units, 200 cubic feet in two of the 3-bedroom units, and 212 cubic feet in four of the 3-
bedroom units. While the amount and location of the proposed storage does not meet the
standards found in Municipal Code Section 15.56.020 (C), Section 15.56.070 allows a deviation
from those requirements if good cause can be shown and the merits of the project, as a whole,
make such an exception worthwhile. Staff believes that the project is meritorious because it is of
good quality and will increase the supply of low and medium priced homes in the area.
Furthermore, incorporating 20G-250 cubic feet of storage space into all 25 units would require
extensive structural changes to the existing buildings and reduce each unit's habitable space.
Staff finds that they have provided as much storage area as is feasible given the current design
and recommends that the City Council grant the exception permitted by the CVMC.
Urban Core Specific Plan:
The plans for the proposed project have been reviewed and meet the requirements of the UCSP
and Municipal Code, including the C-2 Broadway South Sub-District of the Corridors District.
The Corridors District is characterized by low-rise structures with retail service, office and
residential uses more oriented towards automobile than pedestrian traffic. In general, the UCSP
design guidelines for the Corridor District focus on developing a cohesive blend of high-quality
new commercial and residential development. The Corridors District includes three design
principles that aim to:
1. Promote sound architectural practices;
2. Ensure compatibility between different uses;
3. Encourage safe and logical parking and circulation.
Sound Architectural Practices: The front and side elevations of the 3 story mixed-use building
would be highly visible along Broadway and adjacent properties. The buildings are well-
articulated, especially the front elevation facing Broadway, which incorporates 2 and 3 story
elements, roofline cornices, balconies with wrought iron railings, variation in colors and
materials, variation of the building plane, expansion joints, and windows. The project, as
conditioned, will provide an attractive building fayade as seen from Broadway and the
surrounding neighborhood.
Compatibility between uses: The Project design incorporates a loop driveway around the
perimeter of the site that provides separation between the residential units and adjacent
properties. Also, the Project will share a driveway access with the adjacent 7-11 store to the
south. The project site is next door to 760 Broadway on the north, which has also been developed
with mixed use - multi-family residential and commercial uses on the ground floor that would be
similar to and compatible with the Project.
Parking and Circulation: Vehicle access has been separated into two access points, with the
8-6
Meeting Date: 01/12/10
Page 7
access to parking spaces serving the commercial suites on the south side of the site, and access to
parking spaces serving the residential units on the north side of the site. The driveway will wrap
around the perimeter of the site, and access to the residential parking spaces and garages and
commercial suites will be provided. The applicant has designed the site plan to provide parking,
driveways and landscaping that comply with the requirements of the UCSP and Municipal Code.
All of the required 47 parking spaces are provided on-site. The driveway meets the minimum
width requirement of24 feet.
Potential traffic impacts in the UCSP area have been addressed by adoption of the Western
Transportation Development Impact Fee (WTDIF) ordinance. As stipulated in the WTDIF
ordinance, this project is required to pay WTDIF fees upon building permit issuance to pay for
their share of future traffic improvements.
In addition to the above, Section E. 3 of Chapter VI -Land Use and Development Standards,
contains special design objectives for mixed-use projects. This includes the following:
1. Storefronts along street frontages must maintain a pedestrian orientation at the street
level;
2. Provide for internal compatibility between the difftrent uses within the project;
3. lv!inimize the effects of any exterior noise, odors, glare, vehicular and pedestrian
traffic, and other potentially significant impacts.
Pedestrian orientation: The mixed-use retail/residential building will face eastward toward
Broadway, with the main entrances to the retail suites on the ground floor along the Broadway
street frontage. Broadway includes an existing IO-foot sidewalk with palm trees. The Broadway
street frontage proposed by the Project would include an II foot wide enhanced entry between
the retail building and the edge of the public sidewalk, which will provide opportunity for
enhanced paving, benches, planter pots and landscaping at the base of the buildings adjacent to
the unit entries that will provide pedestrian-oriented street space.
Internal compatibility: The ground-floor residential units will be separated from Broadway by
the proposed commercial suites. To provide increased separation, the applicant provided a 7-foot
wide common pedestrian pathway with landscaped insets separating the rear of the commercial
suites from the adjacent residential units. The location of rear commercial entry doors and the
residential unit entries and windows located across the pathway would be staggered, so that
residential units would have enhanced privacy. The common recreational open space area for the
residents would be screened from the parking lot by a solid masonry wall and landscaping. Also,
residential units will be designed to comply with Municipal Code requirements to reduce interior
noise levels in compliance with the code.
Minimize adverse environmental affects: The conditions of approval require that a supplemental
acoustical study be prepared prior to issuance of building permits to address any potential
impacts from HV AC unit noise, and that the project be designed to comply with interior noise
standards of the Municipal Code. An Acoustical Analysis Report was prepared by the applicant
and approved by staff. The study recommends measures to insure that interior noise levels due to
exterior sources would be 45 CNEL or less in any habitable room, which will be included as a
condition of approval of the project.
8-7
Meeting Date: 01/12/10
Page 8
In order to comply with UCSP requirements, staff recommends conditions of approval to
regulate the intensity of light, including utilizing lower levels of lighting during off-peak hours,
and to direct light fixtures away from adjacent properties and streets so that the lighting does not
cause glare to reflect on adjacent properties.
The conditions of approval also require that prior to demolition or renovation work, a licensed
abatement contractor shall remove and properly dispose of any hazardous materials found on-
site. Based on this analysis, staff finds that the project as conditioned, has been designed to
minimize any potential adverse environmental affects on-site and in the surrounding area.
Conclusion:
Staff's review and analysis found that the proposed project is well designed and will be a high
quality addition to the area. The project will contribute to improving the appearance and image
of the area, and is consistent with the development standards and the design guidelines of the
UCSP and the City's Municipal Code. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed
project, subject to the conditions contained in the Draft City Council Resolution of Approval of
the Tentative Condominium Subdivision Map (See Attached Draft City Council Resolution).
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICTS:
Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings
within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property, which is subject to this action.
CURRENT FISCAL YEAR IMPACT:
There are no fiscal impacts to the City from processing of the Tentative Condominium
Subdivision Map applications. All costs are covered by the deposit accounts.
ONGOING FISCAL YEAR IMPACT:
According to the applicant's preliminary estimate, the valuation of the project is $4.26 million
dollars. The implementation of the proposed project would create an increase in assessed
valuation and the Redevelopment Agency would receive one percent of this increase as tax
increment revenue, amounting to approximately $42,600.00. Approximately 20% ($8,520) of
this tax increment revenue is set aside for low and moderate-income housing. The remaining
$34,080 is divided among the County of San Diego, local school districts, and the City
Redevelopment Agency.
Attachments
1. Locator Mapl Aerial Photo
2. Tentative Mapl Site Plan/Elevations
3. Minutes of the CVRC and Redevelopment Advisory Committee
4. Ownership Disclosure Statement
8-8
Meeting Date: 01/12/10
Page 9
Prepared by: Rich Zumwalt, A.I.C.P., Associate Planner, Development Services Department
J: IPlanninglCase jilesljj;-09IPCS\publichearingIPCS-09-02 DRAFT CCAGENDA STATEMENT
8-9
<'"
~
o
z
.......
.....
~
.....
OJ
~
~
l::
~
.......
~
.....
.....
I::
OJ
~
.....
rrJ
OJ
~
OJ
rrJ
;:J
~
OJ
X
.....
~
~
OJ
rrJ
o
p..
o
;..
~
t-.
~
I
0"\
o
I
U
~
o
8-10
\\j\gr--u' ...;~- \--.----" --'
II I' ...~~ ...~- \-- r _ ---"I'
\ , \..;:"--~---. \\
\ "........1. ___ ___ \ _ ___\\-
Q' ::\:".".~sr@
. ~ - -'---\q~~\ ~
O~I ~~\ .~:. \ ~\c:\ \
\~f!:~ ~f... %~\~
. /,"",rl. ',\~ '- I~\ ~""~. tJ2\~
..---...$ -----\ I-- ... ~ --
, --- I . ,.". ",. ,----,/-l
--- hi \,' \t . ~~1rC S2
, ~' I ~\lt~~0:'~' ~~~'~t/-~ E
\ \ ~:-/ ~
\" I' /'" "",. "----'1"--l
~\ \ . h _' :-.-?~. - ^'1~;:'- =-..- ..- .- ...---- JJ
~ 1"2:===~ ----:-'- "1 )>
Y \ l"c/L --::~:~~ \lj!rn~
0/' ,~- ~ 111e\5:
~::::-::- ~ \ i (;)>
-' \ .~ \ II~~
\ H'
:1' .::::?\\ \ I ---I --- .Igo
iO' ""'1" --- j' zI
~~ ~~ ~ ~
" 'll ~!j I!! " , !"" 'I:! 1~ ''','. f!l~,~ gc
I~ ~ ': 1 ~~ \l ~ 1~ ~~a JL_IJL- ~~ :..; "' ~~ ~~i~. _ I U&~:~ ~:~r
'i!~ ',I, 'l,,~.'I' Lr}J.:,l', , 'j" f'.l :JJ) ,L rl ,i' "I,:" ~ ,~;)>
!.,ij rt:7ii'iill rill Ur;;l '\ ~ 'f I!I ~,,: -fIT-r-f I,:' ,el!!~ "!'c<
" ,llg I! I~ ~ .1,- ,~i ~~!r,;: ~;' ~ .11 ~~ f-JL-l : : i',i: .! -.., ,l~UJ
I' ~ I,! '. i ,,, ,"'V'-", "II "----, , ' l" .:1. Ii -l
! ~ il. ~.I11 - ..:K!l I ~ L~ ~_7 ~ ,. l~,' -"'"- "iQ,~ "Y' .. )>
.;<;~.; ~ j! ,iN.1'! d':,; j., " ..: lj ~ :';: .I' I' -l
~~ ~!:B" s!J"-r---.l ;~~, ~' ~.. :o;:r ~!i ~l~ !i$:
~ ~!!~ ~ il ~:F ~"'~!' ~ !! !, IIi!' !ii~: III j;
'''!'' ' I. 0
II;U ill! 88~ l.lillmllilll.i i~!~ Ilrn illl~.,,!i!.i'i jj~ ii !I. !f~' iIWj" J' ml!!:1 -l
~ !,!~ iUii!!lI~ r:,i !;!Ili !"; !~I~ h~! ~~ ~~ i!~ :1: "~:"~ JIll ~l:l!'!~ -l!i:,;I
, l!'~ i"' ~ ,,,,,, ,. ,. .. I ," -, . i! ! ' " ' ..
.: . i ,- 'i'!'! 1-' '1 i !" I,.! ", .! I' I.
II! I:; I Iii!: "l 11 !" 1 :11 II~. I" ll: ' ! ; ill!
I:' .j,; ..', ! !~ ! !~ e !'" 11" i1
"J "., !'l" . ~ ; I l ~ c ~ i
I~ zli I -; . ~~ ~ ~ l~ f I';" ~
P'~~!"~ g" ~ ~
.. lillIi ~ ~"l i
~~~3"~~ ~ =i
8~ D~ 8!J. '" ... lD -<
~; ~" ~g ~ ~ n~ I 0
" .! ~j,::! .,,:::: ....."
, . I'" 0 "c;;> m (")
~ j~ ~ ~ :1J : ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
a ~ ~ ~ ~~ :g ~
~ !e11,1, I' I' J* i_;i I~.i !
~ ... 0 i ~ ;~ ;;
~ ~ ~ H ~ 0 :i~ ~
N
.'1 ~g '"
'" \!D !!,.
-- 8"
s~,;;i _ ,;,'
'~;1 I,
\ l '
, " 7
!R!~ :./ ~
,!" . "
~~_" . '" _ iI
A Q; :1'
~ [ ,
," W '
'I~-~~ru' i
~~ Ii, ,
'" .r.; t-" ~
.:;
.C-
e; s.
...c .,
~:; ~ll
i;:fl
1;
01
,. J
~~
I
.
!i1
~r.?~
,Ii;
~I'!"
..
'I
Ii
Qn~
dU
i!
,I
~ ~
8, '1 ill
lilllil
Iii!! I
l;
i~ r' u~~mf~i;~Ui~ll;r~r'll
~I' rf~frl'i I fl rrr r I r I I
.,1\ .:: m I
j,~\'lltlI~~llo0~':' 10,
. "i, ~'i Ii' I: ~
\ ,I
~rffmm,!m 11 ~ r rm~ mrl)
111[1 II 'II I ~
. ,I ',., . I ~
.'0 T: (I !11D"1i"]I.Oml. 0': 1 .
I I] t:!:L,_., I l
, I, . II'
I i
8-11
TENTATIVE MAP - CHULA VISTA TRACT NO.
BROADWAY CONDOMINIUMS
1.
.
F
!--.
;
I:~,' - >~, ~ill,'-, -:1 J "'" L~:I'
~ l__"::.-~10-13
"-j I/~ i I'lL ,---=-~ .!
I. -::J-I~ -I II LOT 12
I. ~ ,Ii!: -I J '~__~'1671-210-1:.~._..
~J~~tf~ F-:
I :1 --t~J ,J 671.?10.11
I ,'I ",'1 i ""j"'~-?~:,
_L"U !~ _:-~~~:!~~~.~. -
" '. ,,\w.'~,&W.",":.r!o:--'" ,_ ' ,
.WiI~.. :-, ~~
,~~..J-~-"~! ,vJ
c.-~--~-~L~. II ~=Jw~
II
1\
I! 671-200-27
I ~ POR. BE 1/4
i ~_._
! !
i I.~
OJ'
L!
:[
'I
II
i I
L.
I
\1
if
.-..~.'.- '-" \
,
~,",~I
~~'''''''''''''ElJl
o.
...
~
"..,=tlC_
h~l~~t.""
""""~,",""" ,', "
}I
,
1/4 SEe 164 #
R.D.S. 4988 -
i ;'- _eel :
1'_.1 --,'
Ii :
" .
r~
,.
I:
1'1..__,
I
In~
~. - f
,
~ I
> ~IT' I
, I
,.
, ; I
, ,
W~WL.QL;','Qllli.
"" !!..~lf.~~
, ,
i ~~ ~
. '-0
-I .c
. \- .
~)~~\ 1~~~
I' .c...;. ~
l .\~ ~
I ~
~
~:.~ ~
I ~
i.::c-
i
, 0
g
L___
't 'i .i"
;;
:j
'.
!..
.1
SCALE. '"'20'"1
,
,
&n.=_.."..."""
.. r","""""",,,,~__". ~""'"
,..lI[".""......
,e,.~~IlM"II"''''''tt.
&.""""'''''~,...''''''''."
4.l.""""l'lI"."''''''''
A-."""" o..-t""""" ......~'''''''...
'&'__."l<"""
A"",.,....""'~_..If.,..,,;
.<!>[lI<'KuJ...._
h.""""""''''''''"'''''.''''''''
Q:>u'<D<>.o."""'''''''''''
<D!==L~~rE~''''''.
N
~
I
<Xl
CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRACT
BflOAOWAY CONDOMINIUMS
TENT A TIVE MAP
I>REPAREOIlY'~ UIlIlAN CORE SOl> n__1
DIlC Og.Ir,pcs 09-01
C~LW lNcmff!/./HG. INC,
m/LS'C/IIuPJ,U;CON"uLTAllfS
PROJECT ADORES!,
BROADWAY CONDOMINIUMS
CHULA VIST A CA 91910
oRIG1NAlDATEOTfREPARATltN, 11/10/1008
REVISIONS,
""
DESCRIPTION,
t_=~'.u,~~"".["U
DATE,
-"--
1100"""
2,'~-:;',,::::,:,:,~
.mll""
3..~';','~;"':';'"."""
-"--
",JIll"""
'.'
5.'
SHEET 2 OF 2
E;Wfiiij'~1':I'..~~-g'iF!M~~~~..S;illiiE'~"'ffi',' a-.!'l,,'il;j m~.~.,':it~il!';b'''lJ''''"'t'' ,rli";;'~":Z; ~-.'-~
q~ f8'~~~~[~" _11- _J]i~-i0~~ t?"~~f.;C"';"::+Y.-::-;tG_~~~i::r:f~~~~~~-'t\t:~ M~' ;;~l, ::"*~-i"!H,'~.... t. ,~.~~tl
~t" -~ d~o.,e '!r~~t:'::"J;<;'"-"""J- .~~,;d;;" !er.,-:;-_-,,~,- t.-:,'-':"--,--,"'F": '~"";:;~~...:.:r:~ t,:r~l~?i~' ,_~~\,~~._?<~f,;';''i..'-'" {'€f~...
';I~ .~ J:u:>'t.~1J: I' ~....;;:.. ...,.->< i;i -. ~ - . , :. 'l~"::-. ~l - "'''", '... . '-~l ~ ~~"" f.-...." ~ \V,~'"' ......
;'~.. ';;.~~ff;lt}..;i'1 I' 'I' '~'.i~~;; t.@.. ,/.t;-'ci;;~!;,'; i':::"~l"~ ~~~1~\';.' Ifl~lm!! ml!-'~;I'li~'.:' ,-,,@':2~~1\i\!j
,. 11".....'1,1.1:. ,,,,,,' I ".~!'.'il'.F"!""" "', """ '. ,..~ ",'",."'" .~'~ "" . I" _""'c".~~~,
:'l~~..lL~~?i.j~:1;;~,' ~~~,~'~f ,;! ;)i -'Lt~ ':;iI' ~i<;'~~f: I '. ;;~j"il;.fijf j~iJ~'1. ~ ;;~~,,~!
"~~~' ~~.jl-i~.j=. 1!pJ-~af};, ~~,I!..'l;o(" ~ ,::,., I~~ it "t >--~ ~ :i B .i,tt 'd'l~.;I 19\.i."!k W .f.gn~l. 'M!-I';2.~ ~'';.!
~jl .~~~'~~~jl~!~:~: i~,t~f~q!f1~;)W;'M h'f~~,h~!~ ,~~k)f~'l'!~ 1i~Ff!lfifI3~\~~
" "l'.:f'~ :o;li:j"ii ~~,",i.," .1 ~.<" ~<' (.; ;.. v'1f '~l...^t ~ 1 yr' ..'.~ '/", ',', '''.'\ \.,. o:C;;
~~; ~t$!it.~~!~~f:; ;~i::~~jr h:i1lt:~ 2~r ~if~!'~~;~~~.. ~2n~~~gft~f l* S;>>_~i:iJ-;-(~l~~;~'d~~~~~Qi~!-~1
'~~'lf' ~~:Il'~;l6~9'I!",:,!,j~~ ~nrh! h~" CL~i' Ilk ~~i;l~rgf~H w~'ill'l '~~m 's, ~H;fi~ ',"',- " . L:::c"'!
)~it ~r;;_~~!J~~ t;';;'~ l= ~c <:''':,.t ~I"~~.,..L.,/~~:" (.1 /:;.~.'j.l u,,:;w_ I&.~,,""~~~"~"" AJ'l r:-; -: ...-;",' " f:7". ~
--j~~ ~l'Li'''i'!.t:..:ti! .''', 1'-:-'" - OJ' ~l" \, m - ,- w, CO"", .' l-l_~'~"1 0 -",:,:--,"
"'.....1.o;"..A-~T r. \..~.,.,- _. -.~ ,.,~ '1'" 'UJ' ......
n~~~' ..~.;~.ja~~"lliil .';""~ II( ;- \....' \.) . "'\:, ;,.,' ~',;. ..,~S1j U '--" " .\
~~<)~. ,~, ;~'C,,;{; ';)1 (j1",Q,I1,'fJ ", ..r"~~:. u;~~8L\
...~....:,:
"~..,,.
@t;
:~~i~'~::
.....:. ;::r.
U
f:rJ
1-.
rO'.
;u~n
i;Z;J(!
1~'\ -i~ti
~i_L~ [..<(i!;~j
'~~r.~~m~:,=J~i~i
"'.' u_ .,:,.'.'.- I,)
I..
~}.~
i~'1.
~'E
!1:"
8-13
'..,
~
'-:l
......
~
,
~
~
Vj
N
~
~
~
.......
~
...s;
~
~
~
~
-+-.::.
""'"
~
~
~
'Z"-
.......
4..:.
~
~
~~.
("\.
\.......,J
~
;i,t~~
.ji'
\fftf..,.
'l(;'. I, ".
, " ", .~ ..J
~ ~
",-,,\f 1'(1 ~ >
_ (10
'lll. iii E~
(( Ifl U:;)
:c
v
C'l
c
..::
Q)
"0
c
Q)
c:::
>.
co
;:
"C
co
o
...
III
"~l~~;j
. ~;'~'1~i:~1
I~~
;.,
t.-
~
,.....
""
~
~
""
~
~
,
""'-
\::S.
~<
Q'
~
'q
,.~
3~t~~)~:i~'i
~,' ,-, ~~"" ~'J);f
~.;Z':/~/~/:~'J . ";
'\,rk:;c~~il
, ',*:i:J::1
.~ ~~/\i~~'~
;<
~~l{fI ~~
"- "rl/ 0
;;j I j ill E $'
~( U' u~!
U
I
,',',' '~'.' 'I',__:.:~~... :; J '
',;; -;~~~~~,~!,
. _ \. ,'~'~~~> '\:,:~~..,;::..~'~~':~tr
. ','~(;" '.i1r":'~:;~i-!~~^;:~;,~gJ;,:
, ,'"" Jr,Ic'~L",})fI""::""'"':"'"
'-., I ,:,.<_~:~~~~~L,T~~~:~~ftt~;~~,~
, "," I'" ","J:jf'i/"o.Jt,,-, O~~''''',''
',,", I'r..~, 11~":'1;~ I ~~~!' l,:
,', '1"6"" -""~ -"',',"
";Jf~;.--!i.'g.:1.5 ~l_ i.~~~~:":-~~.1-h
, ; ,,~ <'''7F:*i1:~--;:-'- "':,,
,'~'}: ~:;\.. rlrt:;';:~~11 ~~ith~}'
..' " ~'l\..ilt''1r'~~' ,...;::;~_ 1 ,
, ..' ";J' --""'flr: -~,. '~"'""'~-'h I,'
". ~ .._~ "'.j'. i1- r-t-.,,~': .--~~" _lie
. ~"...~ _ "'at I'. l...~c~ci:- ~~,......~ I'
~, _' :, ,~*~":'~.ieT:. '_~ -~ ~-:-;7="~:':,~ -~~:
,', ,~,"" . ~i.i'l-'- ;~; ,,,~'~'-JIi .11t
~ ' ~ ,'tl,. :, ,_.t; __ ~..::.::;::~.;jJ ':: H .-
'ff II! .~.. - _:"'J, \ -'l~ ,''I'
~: -J- ,_.JII:....;.;Sit~ J "r':-"!C< ~'" ';'
); ,~-..l "'"""[I ~--;-~;~... ,t;,',
",I: ,[F'1! '"I' '-"i-'" ,~ '",' '\"r~
" 'r.::=1I.; 1 J~1.:.-.ru- I .Vj r!
I': ~J::, w~ _1Jliii:':.,lli;;;r. ...'""',-: ~'I" 'iT'
[.fjIt,! "1 '~~l ~ ~.:~..'. ~~r,.
1T'~'1 I ,1~oIC~ -::-r,:~~' ~i, \:~"'~
., "q' '" r.:-~, _", '::-~'>'~,L", ,,; c'
a: i ffi~-'-r;:-' ~ ,11 .~,;
rUr '"," , ~~.>;'l""~ v;::,'
U, j - .~ l.,-, 1~~
:t'~t--.""" ",'\" ,r"
,1,; ~ . 1 ' -' , ---.:-~--i~:;~" l'\~'
:I",l'.~ _r~,~ I ,,' ~ =~~~'~~;I; I;,',
f "1 :i:71:I:~"':"'~ 1- ',> ~ .j
'';:~'\\I r, ~ .~ 0',' '" ", ','J!, te"
"1,1 , ."-,,,',"1," "/i" 'V',
I 'dig, '- fl:".~' 'I" (\~,...,! l J.l"L
-'\r '_h~- .~.. I J ~I"
~ ~W '11 .' _' l' .'!" ~l '~, l '1'
.....\~' ~; '-I' :\. ~_j'Nil ,r.,J
. \1 I ) ~ :1 . ,~-~..~.ll~ll '-~.'.
~ ",: \1 I': r....\~ .~.~j. II:IJ ,
. ';ll"'---" - 'l." ',. ,.It,,' 1111'
_-~." ~"j. r,;: .' t- -,' < "J<;~., I ;, 1 t:
, .')~'-:;7-"'-"-,"=~~~-~'::"'.': ",r,{" ~'
11"'l"'~'.{. fft~--r~ 'lr!'1-~ rF-'~~' I l'i' . r
"c ~\ ~";: ~ ,:r~ 'ri?~'.~' r-;:; 1" q,~~...~i' ~ (~ ,,h ,
", '. _ (~'~~.ft~P; .G:ti,-: f;--~' II "";\. r lj~' .~~~ l"~~
,-,::,..., i&l~''<--~'' er.,.r..~ 1.~;" Ii. ~" ,;,.f r;ft
'":,'c(,,,\k~; t=~j li<;-~fl!iili:~;i ,.J::""~.
"" "'j~\i~'$C'1. 'Fl!.i::~i"o, r;:*'!SJf!r \ l
@,',hr]" ,'-'7:(: ,~"j"1. .11::';: ;"
.t!l ",:'.;. ~,;l~~~-::~ ~j ~~'-"~ ;:.)'.
:;HriJ~f~,.~~E':! - (Bt{~~~i1: ~J1~&~I" ,t,.,::,t,.,~~., ,',,',' '
...~1":'i,J.i.1,.,, "."." "J ,..,.._",._,_,.,.;;:r~_!"" it..;; I... _
,q:,*,~({. ~~ ,:'1'~-''''.';.'''~>:;:-21i.Vl~~':~;'i' l~~~~:.:
~. 'r. .......',.....,-',., .. ...... .. ,.,j. ".\'S.. 1:; '. '\
..,' -. "'N~: r.~.$~,},~,::,.'~;;..;:~~(<i'.,~~~.[\)~.::j ,\
_..." ~ ,_..L.' : _L"",_.. "" . ..- ';-1 ~~ 'w.: :".\
-)~~;,r:J;';'fi.~\~}:At~t. '.'\
'" ,. ~'.j' ~-.:;;.~ ....., l_ \" I,'" L
.....' '"'"11 ~, ~:~ i! ~ll;P 1
:\;._ pd",11 ,~~-~'.If' !
. "C'-" ~...., """'~f ~" I ii,
_ ~ ,....1 ,I! 'l"l.."_, ~
-'_- .;.:.;, ~-~ ;~:.l.iJ ..r.."" if \
-- _,~~;. ~, :r~. ~~~{ :t,,;,.::,r I
i'\~~\~p'; \[
I
,
"
"
.~',
\..'-;.
.~
j ."~
:'1
\'~w~.,.
;[ :~:i:
"""1.).
~.. c
"2~~' _
co,
.'?~:5r:~
-,;
'"
.", - .
Cl
C
";:
Q)
"0
C
Q)
0:::
.c:
-
:J
o
(/)
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE (RAC)
May 7, 2009
6:00 PM
CVPD Community Room
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Chula Vista Redevelopment Advisory Committee was
called to order at 6:10p.m. in the Chula Vista Police Department (CVPD) Community
Room.
RAC ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Cory, Aguilar, Wright, D'Ascoli, Cohen and Chair Clayton
ABSENT:
Martinez, Moctezuma, Rovira-Osterwalder
ALSO PRESENT: Yin Chang, Owner of 778 Broadway Condos; Daniel Contreras,
Architect, Milano Group Architects; Bruno Callu, Civil Engineer; Felipe Romo,
Draftsman/Consultant; Associate Planner Zumwalt; Sr. Project Coordinator Kluth; Principal
Planner Power, and Sr. Administrative Secretary Fields
1. Approval of Minutes - March 19, 2009
Motion to not approve minutes due to a lack of quorum of those members
attending the March191h meeting. Motion by D'Ascoli / Second by Clayton
Minutes to be filed and reviewed for acceptance when there is a quorum
2. Oral Communications
There were none.
3. Open House and Project Review
3.a. Project Review No.1:
Broadway Condos/Mixed Use; 778 Broadway
Project Manager: Richard Zumwalt, Associate
Planner
Summary:
. Project is proposed for two parcels at 778 Broadway. One lot is currently
developed with a "Best Choice" motel and the other is vacant.
. Design Review and Tentative Map applications for the construction of two new
buildings and the conversion of two existing motel buildings.
. The buildings will be 3 stories, with a maximum height of 35 ft.
. Mixture of 25 new residential condominium units and six new commercial retail
suites
. The project will include private balconies or patios and a common recreation
area for residents.
Questions & Comments Received:
Site Plan/Design
. Project site design and architecture is attractive. (RAC)
Page I - RAe Minutes May 7, 2009
8-16
. Provide adequate pedestrian access/sidewalk along Broadway. Don't let the
design of the building and related improvements such as planters narrow this
area. (RAC)
. Consider providing better separation between the rear of the commercial suites
and residential building than just a sidewalk and 2-fl. landscape strip.
Alternatives include possibly reducing the depth of commercial suites, adding
additional landscaping, re-designing retail and/or residential entries, or other
means. (RAC)
. Concern related to the north driveway, which is gated. Ingress/egress from
Broadway may be difficult with the gate. The applicant should work with staff
to determine if adding a turnaround or removing the gate is feasible. (RAC)
. Site plan should consider needs of delivery vehicles and loading spaces (i.e. size
of delivery vehicles, maintaining safe site access, turning radius, and backing
distance) (RAC)
. Commended the applicant for preserving a portion of the old motel. Should
consider whether it makes more financial sense to demolish the existing motel
buildings and build new structures, as opposed to re-using them. (RAC)
. Provide a break in the architectural massing on the sides of the retail building as
seen from Broadway, as suggested by staff. (RAC)
. Non-reflective type glass should be used along Broadway. (RAC)
. Outdoor rooftop balconies facing Broadway not likely to be used by the
residents because of noise from Broadway and adjacent uses. Consider re-
designing these to internalize or re-orient them to make them more private.
(RAC)
Parking
. If retail parking will be reserved for customers, where will employees park?
(RAC)
. Provision of compact spaces, if permitted by the Urban Core Specific Plan
(UCSP), would be OK to help provide all required parking on site. (RAC)
. Applicant should provide 2 spaces per residential unit, such as is required in
non-UCSP areas. Although the UCSP allows for reduced parking standards,
reality is that people won't always use transit and buyers may have more than 1
car. Inadequate on-site parking could impact adjacent residential
neighborhoods. Use parking standards for non-UCSP areas. (RAC)
o Applicant should use the standards established within the UCSP. Suggested
deviations from these should be directed to the Planning Commission.
(Public)
o Studies of the City of Berkeley and by others have found that reduced
parking standards such as those imposed by the UCSP, including shared
parking and in-lieu fees for parking, have the result of encouraging people to
use the trolley or bus. (Public)
o What are the requirements in non-UCSP areas? (Public) The parking
requirement would be approximately 69 spaces, compared to the 47
required for this project under the UCSP. (Staff)
. How does this project and its parking requirements compare with Spotlight on
Broadway? (Public) That project was approved using different parking
standards, via a Precise Plan application that was approved prior to the adoption
of the UCSP. For the mixed residential/commercial portion, it required
Page 3 - RAC Agenda
May 7, 2009
8-17
approximately 58 spaces, and for the residential portion, it required 2 garage
spaces per unit, which was approximately 80 spaces. (Stair)
. If feasible, consider sharing parking with adjacent businesses to provide
additional parking. (RAC)
Landscapi ng
. With the exceptions listed below, members concurred with staff
recommendations re: landscaping, including providing a more urban landscape
theme along Broadway, and adding additional plantings to soften the unit
entries and the base of buildings along the driveway. (RAC)
. Consider the use of fencing and landscaping to be more open rather than a solid
masonry wall to buffer the common rec area from the commercial parking.
(RAC)
. Suggested the use of native plants such as Mexican Nobilia, which is good for
wildlife and can also be used in an urban landscape theme. Also suggested the
removal of Pennisetum from the plant list, which is considered an invasive
plant. (RAC)
Energy/Envi ron mental
. The architect was encouraged to seek LEED (Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design) certification, which is addressed in the UCSP. (Public)
Revital ization
. Supportive and excited about the project and appreciate the Appl icant's efforts.
(RAC)
. Development of mixed-use condominium projects would help support other
businesses and future re-development along Broadway. (Public)
. The City needs projects like this, so we should not nit-pick at the project, but
support it by helping the developer to get through the process. (Public)
4. Member Comments
There were none.
5. Staff Comments
There were none.
6. Adjournment at 7:30 p.m. to a Regular Meeting of June 4, 2009, 6:00 p.m., at a
location to be determined.
Materials provided to the Redevelopment Advisory Committee related to any item on this agenda are
available for public review in the Redevelopment & Housing Office at 276 Fourth Avenue, Bldg. 300, during
normal business hours.
Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests individuals who
require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity or service,
request such accommodations at least 48 hours in advance for meetings, and 5 days for scheduled services
and activities. Please contact the Community Development Department for specific information at (619)
691-5047. Service for the hearing impaired is also available at (619) 585-5647. You may also contact the
Community Development Department at least 48 hours in advance to request Spanish Translation Services
be available at the meeting.
Page 3 - RAC Agenda
May 7, 2009
8-18
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE (RAe)
Attachment.
July 16,2009
4:00 PM
City Hall, C101 Conference Room
276 Fourth Avenue
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Chula Vista Redevelopment Advisory Committee was
called to order at 4:07 p.m. in Conference Room C1 01 at City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RAC ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Gilguin, Danciu, Zimmerly, D'Ascoli, Johnson, Smyth and Chair Clayton
ABSENT:
Martinez, Rovira-Osterwalder
ALSO PRESENT: Yin Chang, Owner of 778 Broadway Condos; Daniel Contreras,
Architect, Milano Group Architects; Associate Planner Zumwalt; David York, presenting
for Carl's Jr.; 3 applicant representatives also in attendance; Asst. Planner Caroline Young;
Earl Jentz; Greg Mattson; Principal Project Coordinator Leilani Hines; Sr. Admin Secretary
Patricia Laughlin.
1. Approval of Minutes - March 19,2009 and May 7/ 2009
Motion to approve minutes made by D'Ascoli / Second by Zimmerly.
2. Oral Communications
There were none.
3. Open House and Project Review
3a. Project Review No.2:
Broadway Condos/Mixed Use; 778 Broadway
Project Manager: Richard Zumwalt, Associate
Plan ner
Summary:
. Project is proposed for two parcels at 778 Broadway. One lot is currently
developed with a "Best Choice" motel and the other is vacant.
. Design Review and Tentative Map applications for the construction of two new
buildings and the conversion of two existing motel buildings.
. The buildings will be 3 stories, with a maximum height of 35 ft.
. Mixture of 25 new residential condominium units and six new commercial retail
suites
. The project will include private balconies or patios and a common recreation
area for residents.
. Project has been redesigned and has generally addressed concerns of the RAC
on May 7,2009.
o Compliance with parking standards on-site,
o Removal of the gated driveways, and
o enhanced landscaping treatments.
Page 1 - RAe Minutes
July 16,2009
8-19
A-TtA-c..HrcLlV( ~
Questions & Comments Received:
. North elevations have unrelieved large areas (RAC). Agreed to break up area
(Applicant).
. Additional landscaping such as a meandering sidewalk to enhance area
separating commercial and residential (RAC).
. Parking meets the requirements of the Urban Core Specific Plan but may not be
desirable. (Public)
. Discourage employee parking intended for commercial uses and support 2-hour
parking on the street in front of the commercial uses (RAC).
ACTION:
The Committee voted unanimously to send the project to the CVRe.
3b. Project Review No.1:
Carl's jr. Drive Thru Restaurant & Retail Space,
695 H Street/Woodlawn Ave. Project Manager:
Caroline Young, Assistant Planner
Summary:
. Design Review, Variance, and Preliminary Environmental Review applications
for the construction of a one-story, 2,189 square-foot Carl's Jr. drive-thru
restaurant and a one-story, 946 square-foot attached retail building.
. The Variance application submitted is a request to deviate from the minimum
lot coverage, floor area ratio, and building height standards per the Urban Core
Specific Plan (UCSP).
Questions & Comments Received:
UC-12 Zoning Regulations
. Property is seen as a key location and a gateway area. Project should be more
dense and intense uses with a larger building on the site of a few stories. Given
the prominence of the location, concern was raised as to proposed use as the
highest or best use of the property. Long term vision as a gateway may be in
conflict with the reality. (RAe)
. Project doesn't appear to fit the vision for the UCSP. Needs to be more
pedestrian friendly and have better pedestrian access. (RAC)
. The retail space appears to place constraints on the project and the necessity of
this area/use should be evaluated. By the removal of the retail space, additional
area could be then provided for the setback and landscaped area. (RAC)
. Constraints on the property from easements, sideway/parkways, the need for
cueing and drive through aspect of the proposed use, etc leave little
developable area and constrain the design of the building. These constraints
make it difficult to meet the overall vision of a major gateway area. (RAC)
. A resident inquired as to why the minimum floor area, minimum lot coverage,
minimum building would be approved.
. There is a need for the applicant, property owner and staff to look at the
property overall, review past discussions and efforts at developing the site,
explore other feasible design options or project alternatives in light of the
designation as a gateway area and the reality of the constraints on the property.
Requested that staff, including Redevelopment staff, meet with the parties.
(RAC)
Page 3 - RAC Minutes
July 16, 2009 .
8-20
Building Design/Site Planning
. Look to redesign the building to improve pedestrian accessibility, building
elevation/design at Woodlawn and H Street Corner (cueing and drive through at
the corner) and south elevation (add architectural interest). Suggested placing
the building towards the rear of the property, with the driveway along
Woodlawn Ave located adjacent to the rear property line. In addition, it was
also suggested to remove or relocate the drive-thru to the rear of building. The
drive-thru should take up only one side and not two sides of the building.
Revise the floor plan layout, such as the kitchen area, to improve the exterior
layout of the drive-thru. (RAC) Applicant indicated that alternative site plan
layouts were previously analyzed but determined to be infeasible.
. This is a Major Gateway, the project should avoid designing for vehicles versus
the pedestrian. (RAC)
Landscaping
. Suggested additional landscaping on the corner of the property, as well as
landscaping beyond the new property lines along H Street and Woodlawn Ave.
This will avoid having the drive-thru immediately adjacent to the new property
line once the City takes the street dedication. The landscaping should screen the
drive-thru from public view. In addition, the members also suggested providing
a pedestrian path along Woodlawn Ave to avoid pedestrian's crossing the drive-
thru or walking in the driveway area, which is unsafe. Overall, this is not a
pedestrian friendly site. (RAC)
Parking
. Possibility of reducing the on-site parking on-site since customers could
potentially use 'the H Street Trolley Station parking across Woodlawn Ave
(RAC). Applicant indicated that their business is reliant on on-site parking and
did not want to look at shared parking off-site.
4. Member Comments
No member comments.
5. Staff Comments
No staff comments.
6. Adjournment at 5:47 p.m. to the Regular Meeting of August 6, 4:00 p.m., at a location
to be determined.
Materials provided to the Redevelopment Advisory Committee related to any item on this agenda are
availabie for public review in the Redevelopment & Housing Office at 276 Fourth Avenue, Bldg. 300, during
normal business hours.
Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests individuals who
require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity or service,
request such accommodations at least 48 hours in advance for meetings, and 5 days for scheduled services
and activities. Please contact the Redevelopment & Housing Department for specific information at (619)
691-5047. Service for the hearing impaired is also available at (619) 585-5647. You may also contact the
Redevelopment & Housing Department at least 48 hours in advance to request Spanish Translation Services
be available at the meeting.
Page 3 - RAC Minutes
July 16, 2009
8-21
R
D13c1oslIre Stalo:nenl
FurnL:Jnt !i~ {\1tJf1cE Por!r.y 10!~O'I, pl'inr to 8II'f action :.ipor. ..natt-3ts th.::il: wiJi r'3quir~ di.;cretiom.ry a:Hnr, by th~ C;):Jlldl,
PI=<n.iing C:Jmrnhsi:xl and <fl other .,:,ffichJI L:..,{'jF;!;:J of tr,~ C.t'f_ a 3fatem.ont (:,f dr:,cI-').Sme or c::::rtah a.....T'1eis,lip Ct' n..1i1nd.:t1
fnlerl~st;.;, /')::;'}'rtients:, Dr Camp<:lign ccrnribut:cns for.'! ,::ity,::fCI11J:<! \li;,i~ erection rr:ust!::f< flIed Tt:c ~cllow;i'lg inf.::;rm20ticn
,T1ust be di:;du::o::-J.
Es~ the nam~:s. cf dl! p.;:'--f3Dn.s t:.av;:~g :) fina:--,dal j~t€re::;t in trl: prop~n, :h3t :3 ih8: SL:2J~~(';t ('::f th~ ;;lP0F:::c,:i:,n
.contract. r.= g., CW"i~~r. <3}:pJr_::mt. CC:ltractut, SLJ:contJ'a:'tor, m:JterlCll ~up~ii:lr .
'/1 M -P-.o-.B\ 4~ 10
~-'-IU>l.b Llcl.hlb.
:Jr :hc
If any ;:-?rsor:.... jde.,lifiej pu~!Jm1t b (1) l!t~l~ 13 n "nrpolatiGo ur partn'=i3hip, liSt t:hJ2' nameS of ~I! jnc.'jvjdu<l!~) '....iTl
., $2':CC:r;...~trr,e."1<: In th9 bue.j;'l~~ (cor-porationfpatir.::lrsh1p,l entit}'.
HiA.
3
If ,"l~y pNsurl~ iLlE:ltifi0::::: PU'S1;S:r.t to i1:, .;l~o'/e IS a non~j:ro(t o,-,S'anizaHon or ho..sl. a~t tl1e namas -=,1 ~ny p:':~s.!:::1
5erving as di~ctOf ur the f):)r.-pr.o..4r arga:'1izatk.n or.as tru~te~ or b.~r,cfid::;:ry o,tru~tcr ::Jf!ho tr,r=:;:-
illA.
.1.
Ple<J5:' id:"flti:y ev-cr'j p~rson, inctLJifl!l2.ii'[ RDr>.n~~, empla~i=e~, cDr~'J:h:Jr1~R, n- :nnepen1c...t cor,tr-:;!:,:tOr3 )'Cu ~o\'l:
a::s1~11ec fa ~epres;~nt ~'ou be:'crc '-.)r~ CitY::1 t1'S i.'l<):~r.
~\~ t~
~Lf!'J. ~, c..'
5
l'1a5 ;my p"rsar.~ 3.Es:Jcia:~d wHh \hf;:: CCilfract :-ad any fir:<l.fld."!l dea!(I,g\t~1l l;ln :.:ffidar':" Df the Ci~ of Chut.a
'lls:a.1~ tt.pp.'ates to 1his C;Oi1;;-ac!: v:Uhin (be ~st ~2 momh~. Yes_ \10
If Yes, :ni;-;:l~ 'icscr.bc!l1? r:at'.Ire cfthe::nanci<:il h:;.!r~st th~ :Jtfcf.c.J- may h.r..'-3 in :.1is C'.(lt]Ci<3C't
6.
H3VC y.)U m:ade ;J o:Jr.trit:t;U~ni'.Jt more !han .325-0 Wm)j;; ;:"re p;,:,st tv..eh:a (~2:, m':Jnth~ t::: ~ cU'r::;>r:t mer.1t,c,:rl the
C;lut::l V,~,>1? City CC!.Jnc1l7 NcA.. '1'3<:; _lfyC'~. \'llic.'l CocnciJ :-ncr:1b~
8-22
/
\
7. Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official" of the City of Chula Vista in the
past twelve (1)2. months? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, ioan, =tc.)
Yes _ No
If Yes, which offidalH and what was the nature of item provided?
DatedJr;c, ! 9, 2J;o!J
nt
Print or type name of Contractor/Applicant
Person is defined as: any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, district, or other
political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit.
Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, Council member, Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation member,
Planning Commissioner, member of a board, commission, or committee of the City, employee. or staff members.
September 8, 2006
8-23
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP SUBJECT
TO THE CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN FOR THE
BROADWAY CONDOMINIUMS PROJECT, TO DIVIDE 0.99
ACRES LOCATED AT 778 BROADWAY INTO 25 MULTI-
FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND ONE COMMERCIAL
UNIT WITH 6 SUITES
1. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the parcel of land which is the subject matter of this Resolution is depicted
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose
of general description consists of 0.99 acres located at 778 Broadway in the Merged
Redevelopment Area, consisting of Assessor Parcels APN 571-200-18-00 and APN 571-200-
19-00, (Project Site); and
B. Project Applicant
WHEREAS, on December II, 2008, a duly verified application requesting approval of a
Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS-09-02, Chula Vista Tract No. 09-02) was filed with the
City ofChula Vista Development Services Department by Yih-Ruey Chang and Chang-Yung
Chang (Applicant); and
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2009, the development of the Project Site received
discretionary approval from the Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation for Design Review
Application DRC-09-17 for a mixed use commercial and residential project including
twenty-five multi-family condominium units and one commercial unit with six suites; and
D. Project Description; Environmental Determination
WHEREAS, said Applicant requests approval of a Tentative Map to subdivide 0.99 acres
into 25 multi-family residential units and 6 commercial suites (project) on said Project Site;
and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed Project
for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has conducted a
Secondary Study, IS-09-010 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Based upon the results of the Secondary Study, the Environmental Review
Coordinator has determined that the Project is covered by the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report (pEIR) #06-0 I for the Urban Core Specific Plan and related documents, and
has prepared a Secondary Study. Based on the environmental analysis contained within the
Secondary Study, the proposed action will not have any significant etIect on the environment
8-24
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 2
other than as identified in the PEIR. Therefore, a negative declaration, subsequent
environmental impact report, supplement to environmental impact report, or an addendum to
environmental impact report is not required.
E. Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation (CVRC) Record on Applications
WHEREAS, a hearing time and place was set by the CVRC for consideration of the
Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners and residents
within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property, at least ten (10) days prior to the
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the CVRC held an advertised public hearing on the Project on December 10,
2009, wherein the CVRC, took public testimony, heard staffs' presentation, and reviewed and
considered the applications for a Tentative Map (PCS-09-02), Design Review Permit (DRC-
09-17) and Planned Sign Program (PSP-09-02); and
WHEREAS, following staffs' presentation and hearing of public comments, the CVRC
considered all evidence and testimony presented and voted 5-0-1-1 to approve Design
Review Permit DRC-09-l7, and recommend that the City Council approve Tentative Map
PCS-09-02, in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions herein; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested that the eVRC motion and vote to approve the
Project, along with any relevant comment be forward to the City Council for their
consideration at a public hearing to be held following the CVRC action; and
F. City Council Record on Applications
WHEREAS, a hearing time and place was set by the City Council for consideration of the
Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City, its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of
the exterior boundary of the Project, at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the
City Council on January 12, 2010, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 6:00
p.m. to receive the recommendations of the CVRC, and to hear public testimony with regard
to the same; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the Secondary Study required
pursuant to PEIR #06-01 for the Urban Core Specific Plan, and Tentative Map (PCS-09-02).
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that after considering all evidence and testimony
presented the City Council does hereby find and determine as follows:
II. CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECORD
Record of the proceedings of the CVRC at their public hearing on December 10, 2009,
including their vote upon CVRC Resolution No. PCS-09-02 recommending approval,
8-25
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 3
along with any relevant comments, have been provided to the City Council and are
hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. These documents, along with any
documents submitted to the decision makers, shall comprise the entire record of the
proceedings for any California Environmental Quality Act claims.
III. WAIVER OF PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
Pursuant to CVMC 19.09.050, the City Council hereby finds that the requirement for a
Public Facilities Financing Plan is hereby waived. because the project is an infill
development located in a developed portion of the City where adequate public facilities
exist or will be provided concurrent with development of the project site, therefore there
are no public service, facility or phasing needs that warrant the preparation of a Public
Facilities Financing Plan.
IV. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City
Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned herein for 778
Broadway, is in conformance with the elements of the City's General Plan, based on the
following:
1. Land Use and Transportation:
The General Plan land use designation for the site is Mixed Use Residential. The
proposed condominium subdivision will be developed at a density of25 multi-family
dwelling units per acre, with retail commercial uses on the ground floor, which is
consistent with the allowable uses permitted by the Mixed Use Residential General
Plan Designation.
The Project fronts on Broadway, and all related street and other public improvements
required to serve the Project either exist or will be provided in accordance with the
conditions of approval. Projects proposed for the western Chula Vista area are
required to pay the Western Transportation Development Impact fee prior to building
permit issuance, to pay their share of costs associated with future road construction
and maintenance.
2. Public Facilities and Services:
The Project has been conditioned to ensure that all necessary public facilities and
services will be available to serve the Project concurrent with the demand for those
services. There are no public service, facility, or phasing needs created by the Project
that warrants the preparation of a Public Facilities Financing Plan, therefore this
requirement is waived.
3. Housing:
The Project is consistent with the uses prescribed within the Mixed Use Residential
General Plan designation, and will provide additional opportunities for multi-family
home ownership in this area of the Urban Core Specific Plan, as it transitions from
predominantly commercial uses into a mixed-use area.
8-26
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 4
4. Growth Management:
The Project is in compliance with applicable Growth Management Element
requirements because it is an infill project that will be served by existing public
infrastructure. There are no public service, facility, or phasing needs that warrant the
preparation of a Public Facilities Financing Plan.
5. Economic Development
Approval of the Project will help achieve the General Plan objectives that seek to
promote a variety of job and housing opportunities to improve the City's jobs/housing
balance, provide a diverse economic base, and encourage the growth of small
businesses.
6. Environmental
The project is an infill redevelopment project that would not adversely impact
sensitive environmental resources. The Environmental Review Coordinator has
prepared a Secondary Study in reliance on PEIR-06-01, and has determined that the
project is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and finds that
the development of the site to be consistent with the goals and policies of the
Environmental Element of the General Plan.
B. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
configuration, orientation, and topography of the site allows for the optimum siting of
lots for natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities and that the development of
the site will be subject to site plan and architectural review to insure the maximum
utilization of natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities.
C. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City
Council certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of
the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents
of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources.
D. The site is physically suited for residential development because it has previously been
graded and is level, is presently developed as a motel, and is located adjacent to existing
residential and commercial development. The Project conforms to all standards
established by the City for a mixed-use commercial/residential development.
E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein
contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extend to the impact created
by the proposed development.
V. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020 NOTICE
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(l), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the
90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other
exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any
such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section 66020(a) and failure to follow
timely this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, set aside, void or annual
8-27
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 5
imposItion. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does
not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service
fees in connection with the project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations,
or other exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges
to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Project subject to
. the general and spccial conditions set forth below.
VI. TENTATIVE MAP GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A. Project Site is Improved with Project
The Applicant, or his/her successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site with the
Project as described in the Tentative Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract No. 09-02, located
at 778 Broadway.
VII. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A. The conditions herein imposed on this Tentative Subdivision Map approval are
approximately proportional both to nature and extent of impact created by the proposed
development. Unless otherwise specified, all conditions and code requirements listed below
shall be fully completed by the Applicant, Owner or Successor-in-Interest to the City's
satisfaction prior to approval of the Final Map, unless otherwise specified:
GENERAL! PLANNING AND BUILDING
1. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Applicant
as to any or all of the property.
2. Applicant shall pay in full any unpaid balance for the Project, including Deposit Account
No. DQ 1554 and related Engineering Division accounts.
3. Applicant shall, comply, remain in compliance and implement, the terms, conditions and
provisions, as are applicable to the property which is the subject matter of this Tentative
Subdivision Map and as recommended for approval by the CVRC on December 10,
2009. The Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City, providing the City with
such security (including recordation of covenants running with the land) and
implementation procedures as the City may require compliance with the above regulatory
documents. Said agreement shall also ensure that, after approval of the Final Map, the
Applicant and his/her successors in interest will continue to comply, remain in
compliance, and implement such Plans.
4. Ail project landscaping shall conform to the design elements of the City's Landscape
Manual, and requirements of the DRC-09-17 Notice of Decision.
5. The Project shall be constructed in compliance with the Design Review Permit DRC-09-
17 approved by the CVRC on December 10, 2009.
8-28
Resolution No. 20 I 0-
Page 6
6. Any and all agreements that the Applicant is required to enter into hereunder shall be in a
form approved by the City Attorney.
7. If any of the terms, covenants or conditions contained herein shall fail to occur, or if they
are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such
conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City
shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted including issuance of
building permits, deny, or further condition the subsequent approvals that are derived
from the approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their
compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. The Applicant shall
be notified in writing 10 days in advance prior to any of the above actions being taken by
the City and shall be given the opportunity to remedy any deficiencies identified by the
City.
8. The Applicant shall comply with the "Recycling and Solid Waste Management Plan"
which has been approved by Chula Vista Public Works Department, Environmental
Management Services Division. The plan demonstrates those steps the Applicant will
take to comply with Municipal Code, including, but not limited to Sections 8.24 and 8.25,
and meet the State mandate to reduce or divert at least 50 percent of the waste generated
by all residential, commercial and industrial developments. The Applicant shall contract
with the City's franchise hauler throughout the construction and occupancy phase of the
project. The plan shall incorporate trash enclosures which are designed to comply with
the City's N.P.D.E.S. permit if applicable, to provide compatibility with the architectural
style of the development, and to enhance trash enclosure doors where they are highly
visible. .
9. Applicant shall present written verification to the City Engineer from the Sweetwater
Authority (Authority) that the subdivision will be provided adequate water service and
long-term water storage facilities, and has complied with the Authority's requirements, as
specified in the CVRC Resolution of Approval ofDRC-09-17.
10. Applicant shall submit detailed street tree and landscape erosion control plans for the
Project concurrent with grading plan submittal and approved prior to approval of the
Grading Permit by the Director of Development Services or designee. Plans shall be
prepared by a registered Landscape Architect pursuant to the City's Landscape Manual,
City Grading Ordinance and Subdivision Manual. Plans shall be consistent with the
Concept Landscape Plan approved in conjunction with the Design Review Permit DRC-
09-017.
II. Prior to the installation of any dry utilities, including but not limited to cable, telephone,
gas or electric lines, Applicant shall complete street improvement Landscape
Improvement Plan showing above ground utilities. Prior to any utility installation, wood
stakes shall be placed by the Applicant "on-site" according to the approved street
improvement Landscape Improvement Plan, and shall be painted a bright color and
labeled as "future street tree location". Applicant agrees to provide to the City adequate
documentation that all utility companies have been given notice that no dry utility line
shall be located within five feet of the wood stake in any direction. Applicant will
8-29
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 7
maintain street tree identification stakes in the locations as shown on the approved street
improvement Landscape Improvement Plan until all dry utilities are in place.
12. Applicant shall enter into an assignable "Grant of Easements and Encroachment permit"
to ensure the perpetual maintenance of landscaping within the right-of-way by the Home
Owner's Association. Street parkways shall be designated as recycled water use areas, if
approved by the local water purveyor and the San Diego County Health Department.
13. Applicant shall submit plans and information to the satisfaction of the Chula Vista Fire
Department that the Project meets the Chula Vista Fire and California Fire Code
requircments, including but not limited to fire access, water supply, sprinkler systems,
and fire alarms.
14. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Applicant shall show compliance with the
requirements for occupancy of a new condominium project, pursuant to CVMC
15.56.020.
IS. Pursuant to CVMC 15.56.070, a waiver of storage space required by CVMC 15.56.020.c
is hereby granted, contingent upon storage being constructed per the approved Storage
Plan and Design Review Permit DRC-09-017.
AGREEtvIENTS. CC&R's. and FEES:
16. The following fees will be required based on the final building plans submitted (see
attached Development Checklist for more information:
a. Sewer Connection and Capacities Fees
b. Traffic Signal Fees
c. Public Facilities Development Impact Fees
d. Western TDIF
e. Other fees as may be approved by City Council prior to issuance of Building
Permits
17. Payment of the Park Acquisition and Development (PAD) fee per dwelling umt IS
required prior to the Final Map approval (or first Building Permit issuance, whichever
occurs first) in accordance with CVMC 17.10. 100. The PAD fee is adjusted on an annual
basis on October I based on the Engineer Construction Cost Index. The payment of PAD
fee amount in place at the time of the recording of the Final Map is required. The PAD
fee for the project at this time is $174,925.00 (25 @ $6,997/unit).
18. Additional deposits and fees in accordance with the City Subdivision Manual will be
required for the submittal of the following items:
a. Final Map
b. Grading Plans
c. Improvement Plans
8-30
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 8
19. Prior to Final Map recordation, enter into an agreement with the City whereby the
applicant/owner agrees to:
a. Defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and
employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its agents,
officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by the City
of Chula Vista, including approval by its Design Review Board, Redevelopment
Advisory Commission, Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation, City Councilor
any approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision
pursuant to Section 66499.37 of the Map Act provided the City promptly notifies
the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that
the City fully cooperates in the defense.
b. Hold the City harmless from any liability for erosion, siltation, or increased flow
of drainage from this project.
c. Agree to ensure that all franchised cable television companies ("Cable
Company") are permitted equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable
television service to each lot/unit within the subdivision. Restrict access to the
conduit to only those franchised cable television companies who are, and remain
in compliance with, all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are
in further compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures
regulating and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may
have been, or may from time to time be issued by the City of Chula Vista.
d. Agree to comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code
and prepare the Final Map and all plans in accordance with the provisions of the
Subdivision Map Act, Subdivision Ordinance and the Subdivision Manual of the
City of Chula Vista.
e. Agree to include provisions in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions (CC&R's) for the perpetual and routine maintenance of all streets,
sewers, common areas, driveways and private storm drain systems. The City of
Chula Vista shall be named as a party to said Declaration authorizing the City to
enforce the terms and conditions of the Declaration in the same manner as any
owner within the subdivision.
20. Applicant shall submit CC&R's or like documents, as approved by the City Attorney, to
the City Engineer and Director of Development Services for approval prior to approval of
the Final Map. Said CC&R's or like document shall include those items referenced in
Condition 19(e) above, and maintenance of all facilities located within common areas
including but not limited to: walls, fences, lighting structures, paths, recreational
amenities and structures, sewage facilities, drainage structures, drainage BMP's and
landscaping. Said CC&R's shall be consistent with Chapter 18.44 of the Subdivision
8-31
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 9
Ordinance, the Design Review application, DRC-09-17, and shall bc recorded
concurrently with the Final Map.
21. The CC&R's shall include programs and Homeowners' Association (HOA) enforcement
mechanisms for the prevention of non-storm water discharges to the public storm water
conveyance system.
22. Applicant agrees to process a "Grant of Easements, License and Maintenance
Agreement" to allow the HOA to maintain the landscaping within the proposed public
right of way prior to Final Map approval.
GRADING, DRArNAGE. ANTI STORtYfWATER:
23. If required the Applicant must obtain a Land Development Permit prior to beginning any
earthwork activities at the site and before issuance of any building permits in accordance
with Grading Ordinance No. 1797. Applicant shall submit Grading Plans in conformance
with the City's Subdivision Manual and City's Storm Water Management requirements,
including, but not limited to the following:
A. Grading Plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and approved by
the City Engineer.
B. A drainage study and geotechnical/soils study are required with the first submittal
of Grading Plans. The drainage study shall calculate the pre-developed and post-
developed flows and show how downstream properties and storm drain facilities
are impacted. Design should incorporate detention of storm water runoff, if
required.
C. All retaining walls shall be noted on the grading plans and include a detailed wall
profile. Structural wall calculations are required if walls are not built per City
Standards and if fences are to be placed on top of retaining walls.
D. Grading plans shall conform to the City Storm Water Management requirements
and is required in the City's Development Storm Water Manual.
E. All onsite drainage facilities shall be private.
F. Prior to issuance of a Land Development Permit, any offsite work will require a
notarized letter of permission from the adjacent property owners and labeled on
the grading plans.
24. A "Preliminary Water Quality Technical Report for Broadway Condominiums" dated
September 10, 2008, has been prepared by Callu Engineering for the Project. The
applicant will be required to comply with all provisions contained in this final Water
Quality Technical Study. If required by the City Engineer, the Applicant shall submit a
final updated Water Quality Technical Report (WQTR) prepared by a registered civil
engineer to be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit or issuance of
any building permi ts, whichever occurs first.
25. Development of this project shall comply with all requirements of State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002, Waste Discharge
8-32
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 10
Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction
Activity, and any subsequent re-issuances thereof. In accordance with said Permit, a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Monitoring Program Plan shall be
developed and implemented concurrent with the commencement of grading activities.
The SWPPP shall specifY both construction and post-construction structural and non-
structural pollution prevention measures. The S WPPP shall also address operation and
maintenance of post-construction pollution prevention measures, including short-term
and long-term funding sources and the party or parties that will be responsible for the
implementation of said measures.
26. A complete and accurate Notice-of-Intent (NO!) must be tiled with the SWRCB. A copy
of the acknowledgement from the SWRCB that a NOI has been received for this project
shall be filed with the City of Chula Vista when received. Further, a copy of the
completed NO! from the SWRCB showing the Permit Number for this project shall be
filed with the City of Chula Vista when received.
27. Permanent storm water requirements, including site design, source control, and treatment
control Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be incorporated into the project design,
and shall be shown on the plans. Any construction and non-structural BMPs
requirements that cannot be shown graphically must be either noted or stapled on the
plans.
28. This project is required to implement Low Impact Development (LID) principles under
current City Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) standards, the City's
Development Storm Water Manual, and as imposed by the New NPDES Municipal
Permit adopted on January 24, 2007 by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Additional discussion of how required LID principles are incorporated into the project's
design is needed. The County of San Diego Low Impact Development Manual provides
assistance with the selection of various design features. The Manual is on the internet at:
hUp:/ /www.sdcdplu.org/ dplu/Resource/docs/3-pdf/LID-Handbook. pdf
29. Adequate number of trash receptacles shall be provided at strategic locations, where
applicable.
30. Where feasible, storm water runoff from parking areas shall be directed to landscaped
areas before discharge to storm drainage systems.
31. Any proposed trash enclosure areas shall be covered and the site graded in such a way as
to prevent run-on into, and run-off from trash enclosure area.
32. All on-site storm drain inlets and catch basins shall be provided with permanent
stenciling and signage according to City of Chula Vista Standards to prohibit dumping.
33. Separate permits for other public utilities (gas, electric, water, cable, telephone) shall be
required, as necessary.
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 11
34. All proposed sidewalks, walkways, pedestrian ramps, and disabled parking shall be
designed to meet ADA and/ or title 24 standards as applicable.
PUBLlC & PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS:
35. The onsite sewer shall be privately maintained and built to UBC Standards.
36. The Applicant shall obtain a Construction Permit from the Engineering Division of the
Development Services Department to perform the following work in the City's right-ot~
way prior to approval of the Final Map or Building Permit issuance:
A. Removal and replacement of curb, gutter, and sidewalk per SDRSD G-2, and G-7
along the project's frontage. Sidewalk shall be designed and constructed with proper
transitions to existing conditions.
B. Installation of two driveways (24-foot wide) meeting design standards as shown in
Chula Vista standard detail CVCS-I A.
C. Additional asphalt paving for the replacement of the existing curb, gutter and
sidewalk.
37. Applicant shall guarantee prior to approval of the Final Map the construction of the
public improvements deemed necessary to provide service to the subject subdivision in
accordance with City Standards.
38. All driveways shall conform to the City of Chula Vista's sight distance requirements.
Also, landscaping, street furniture, and signs shall not obstmct the driver's visibility at
the entrances to the site.
39. All sewer laterals shall be privately maintained from each building to the City maintained
public facility.
MAPPING:
40. Tie the boundaries of the proposed Final Map to the CA Coordinate System, Zone VI
(NAD 1983).
41. Prior to Final Map, Construction Permit, and Grading Plans approval, the Applicant shall
submit duplicate copies of the Final Map, and Grading Plans in a digital format (such as
(DXF) graphic file), on a CD or through an e-mail, based on accurate coordinate
geometry calculations and in accordance with the City Guidelines for Digital Submittal.
Once the digital Final Map is submitted, the City will be able be assign addresses.
42. Prior to Final Map approval, the Applicant shall submit a conformed copy of a recorded
tax certificate covering the property.
43. All existing easements shall be shown on the Final Map. A title report dated within 60
days of submittal of the Final Map shall be submitted together with supporting
8-34
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 12
documents for all existing public utility easements and offers of dedication. Developer
shall submit evidence of noticing to all existing public utility easement holders within the
project boundaries as required by the Section 66436 of the Subdivision Map Act.
44. All survey monumentation to be set per the Final Map shall be set and verified prior to
release of the Final Map for recordation. Monumentation may be deferred upon
submittal of a bond, or cash deposit, or instrument of credit, if approved by the City
Engineer (to allow grading and/or construction of improvements adjacent to the
monument) to secure said monumentation. The bond or other guarantee shall be based
on the City Engineer's estimate of the cost of the work. If the setting of the survey
monumentation is deferred, it is expressly understood and agreed that all survey
monumentation will be set within thirty (30) days after the completion of the required
improvements, but prior to their acceptance by the City of Chula Vista.
45. Applicant shall grant to the City of Chula Vista on the Final Map a 7.S-foot General
Utility, Tree Planting & Maintenance Easement along Broadway.
46. Applicant shall grant to the City of Chula Vista on the Final Map a 20-foot General
Access Easement along the private drive.
47. Applicant shall provide evidence of a reciprocal access easement for the driveway to the
south.
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REOUIREMENTS:
48. An Encroachment Permit is required for all structures located within City right-of-way
and easements prior to Building Permit issuance.
49. All utilities serving the subject property and existing utilities located within or adjacent to
the subject property shall be undergrounded in accordance with the Chula Vista
Municipal Code. Further, all new utilities serving the subject property shall be
undergrounded prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
IX. EXECUTION AND RECORDATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL
The property owner and the Applicant shall execute this document by signing the lines
provided below, said execution indicating that the property owner and Applicant have each
read, understood, and agreed to the conditions contained herein. Upon execution, this
document shall be recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego, at the sole
expense of the property owner and the Applicant, and a signed, stamped copy of this
recorded document within ten days of recordation to the City Clerk shall indicate the
property owner and Applicant's desire that the Project, and the corresponding application for
building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance without approval. Said
document will also be on file in the City Clerk's Office and known as Document No.
8-35
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 13
Signature of Applicant
Date
Signature of Property Owner
Date
X. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented
and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all
approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits,
deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of
approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with
said conditions or seek damages for their violation. The Applicant shall be notified ten (l0)
days in advance prior to any of the above actions being taken by the City and shall be given
the opportunity to remedy any deficiencies identified by the City within a reasonable and
diligent time frame.
XI.
INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon
the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in
the event that anyone or more terms, provision, or conditions are determined by a Court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed
to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio.
Presented by:
Approved as uJ'orm_by:_____
Gary Halbert, AICP, PE
Deputy City Manager/
Director of Development Services
8-36
DRAFT
\-\.....~u..\- ~ ~
\/t.;>/\D
~"-' '2>
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CVRC)
Date: December 10, 2009
4:00 P.M.
The Special Meeting of the Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation was called to order at
4:04 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista,
California
CVRC ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Directors Desrochers, Munoz, Reyes, Paul, Salas, and Chair Lewis
ABSENT:
Directors Flores
ALSO PRESENT:
Deputy City Manager/Development Services Director Halbert,
Deputy City Attorney Shirey, Redevelopment Manager Crockett,
Senior Administrative Secretary Laughlin
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, MOMENT OF SILENCE
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Written Communication
Memorandum from Paul Desrochers requesting an excused absence from the special
meeting of the CVRC of October 22, 2009.
Staff recommendation: Excuse the absences.
2. LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH
The law firm of Stradling, Yocca, Carlson and Rauth has served as the City's bond counsel
for the City's Certificates of Participation and Tax Allocation Bond refundings and
restructurings, the City's Housing Authority and Industrial Development Authority since
1997.
The consultant selection process is being waived for this agreement. This agreement
serves to update the terms, conditions, pricing of Bond Disclosure and Counsel services
and the pricing of additional as-needed services. The agreement shall expire on December
12, 2012 with the options to extend the agreement with three one-year options.
Staff recommendation: That the CVRC Board recommend approval of the agreement for
the RDA and Housing Authority
Page] of7
CYRC - Minutes - Dccember 10, 2009
DRAFT
ACTION:
Director Salas moved to adopt both resolutions on the Consent Calendar.
Director Paul seconded the motion and it carried 6-1-0, with Director Flores
absent.
CVRC RESOLUTION NO. 2009-010, RESOLUTION OF THE CHULA VISTA
REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDING THAT THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVE THE
FORMAL CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS AS IMPRACTICAL AND APPROVE
AN AGREEMENT WITH STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH FOR BOND
AND DISCLOSURE COUNSEL SERVICES
3. REDEVELOPMENT YEAR-END REPORTS FOR FY 2008/2009 AND HOUSING
FUND PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
The Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency is required to prepare an Annual Report for
consideration by its Board per California State Health and Safety Code Section 33080.1.
The reports provide detailed information regarding the activities of the Redevelopment
Agency, and are required to be presented to the legislative body at this time.
Additionally, California State Health and Safety Code Section 33334.3(d) and (e) authorize
agencies to charge costs of planning and administering affordable housing programs to
their Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (Housing Fund). Agencies must annually
determine that planning and administrative charges are necessary for the production,
improvement, or preservation of affordable housing. The findings are presented in this
report for approval.
Staff Recommendation:
Adopt the resolution:
ACTION:
Director Salas moved to adopt both resolutions on the Consent Calendar.
Director Paul seconded the motion and it carried 6-1-0, with Director Flores
absent.
CVRC RESOLUTION NO. 2009-011, RESOLUTION OF THE CHULA VISTA
REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDING THAT THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY [A] ACCEPT THE 08-09 FISCAL YEAR END
FINANCIAL REPORTS; AND [B] FIND THAT PLANNING AND
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS CHARGED TO THE HOUSING FUND IN FY 08-
09 WERE NECESSARY TO INCREASE, IMPROVE AND PRESERVE THE
SUPPLY OF AFFORDABLE INCOME HOUSING
Page 2 of7
CYRC - Minutes - December 10,2009
DRAFT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. BROADWAY CONDOMINIUMS DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT (DRC-09-17) AND
TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP (PCS-09-02)
This is a public hearing to consider a request by Milano Group Architects (Applicant), on
behalf of the property owners Yih-Ruey Chang and Chan- Yung Chang, for approval of
Design Review and Tentative Condominium Map applications for the construction of two
new buildings and the conversion of two existing motel buildings, to contain a mixture of
25 new residential condominium units and six new commercial retail suites ("Project").
The project is proposed on two parcels at 778 Broadway, located northwest of the
intersection of Broadway and K Street in the northwest area of Chula Vista (see Attachment
1-Locator Map).
Staff Recommendation:
Adopt the resolution:
Associate Planner Zumwalt gave a staff PowerPoint presentation of the project. He advised the
Board and audience that the project had had some extensive revisions on the elevation and
additional architectural articulation and that it was now to the satisfaction of the Director of
Development Services and that provision #11 would be removed from Exhibit B.
The following people were present wishing to speak: Peter Watry and Patricia Aguilar
Peter Watry spoke on behalf of Crossroads II and objected to the 1.6 parking spaces per
unit when the Municipal Code requires 2 for two and three-bedroom apartments. He
thinks it has been compromised due to the area being within the Urban Core Specific Plan.
Patricia Aguilar stated that she is a member of the RAC and that the summary that Mr.
Zumwalt gave of the meeting was incorrect. She said there was significant controversy at
both meetings regarding the parking allowance. To say that the RAC approved the project
is a mischaracterization of what happened at the meetings.
Daniel Contreras, the architect, and Fillipe Romo, project manager, spoke about the
parking spaces required. Mr. Contreras said that all of the comments in the RAC meeting
were positive; that they really seemed to like the project and that Patricia Aguilar was the
only one that had been negative. They stated they were providing the parking spaces that
were required under the code.
Director Desrochers asked staff to go over the parking allowances. Are they small or
standard size spaces and where are the garages. Zumwalt covered the spaces and garages
to the satisfaction of Director Desrochers and a/so addressed the change in code for the
parking spaces required. Parking issues were discussed and addressed.
Director Salas said that possibly the commercial parking could be used after closing hours.
Our issue is: Does it comply with the code and after that, it is a management issue.
Page 3 of7
CYRC - Minutes - December 10,2009
DRAFT
Chair Lewis wanted to look outside the box - from what the code says to what is
comfortable for the people living there. Can there be any consideration to increase the
number of spaces, what would it do to the project and what about storage? He realizes
we're staying within the legal code, but are we staying within the livability/moral code?
Development Services Director Halbert addressed the storage problems by saying that the
issue is that there is an attempt to try to retrofit the existing structure on site to account for
these units. In order to meet the storage requirements you would have to do significant
structural changes to the building so they are requesting that they do the best they can
within that framework. On the parking, as an applicant comes forward, they have to have
some predictability in the process and if they comply with the code, that's what we should
be looking for. If they comply with the code, to ask more, is asking too much.
Director Paul addressed public transit. Manager Crockett said there was a bus stop directly
across the street. There was a discussion of a market-rate program, intended to be
condominium from the beginning, and if anyone has looked at off-site storage. All
concerns were addressed.
Director Salas said that there was a storage unit at 1-5 and L Street which is probably Y2
mile away.
ACTION:
Director Desrochers moved to adopt CVRC Resolution No. 2009-012 heading
read, text waived:
CVRC RESOLUTION NO. 2009-012, RESOLUTION OF THE CHULA VISTA
REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW
PERMIT (DRC-09-17) AND PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM AND
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF A TENTATIVE
CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION MAP (PCS-09-02) AND TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A 34,825 SQUARE FOOT MIXED-USE PROJECT
WITH 25 MULT-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND 1
COMMERCIAL UNIT WITH 6 SUITES LOCATED AT 778 BROADWAY
Director l::LIE;~~j;~~!ijiE[.1 seconded the motion and it carried 5-1-1, with Director
Flores absent and Director Reyes abstaining.
ACTION ITEMS
5. FIVE YEAR REDEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (2010-2014)
The Five Year Redevelopment Implementation Plan is required by State redevelopment
law and provides a strategic work plan to facilitate successful redevelopment for the next
Page4of7
CYRC - Minutes - December 10, 2009
DRAFT
five years. It also serves as an opportunity for the City of Chula Vista to define and
delineate key policies, guiding principles and be an important educational resource about
the role and goals of redevelopment.
The 2010-2014 Implementation Plan was prepared in accordance with the statutory
requirements of redevelopment law (Health and Safety Code 933000, et seq.) and is the
strategic planning document for the Redevelopment Agency.
Staff Recommendation:
Adopt the resolution
The following people were present wishing to speak: David Dancui, Peter Watry, Earl Jentz
and Patricia Aguilar.
David Dancui is representing 3 civic associations and is also in the 5-year redevelopment working
group. He is in agreement with most of the projects, but in speaking with many residents feels
there are two areas which will cause alarm. Issue one is the proposal to fund a study by ULI
which he feels is unnecessary and a waste of money that could pay back debts and/or keep
facilities open longer. The more important second issue is staff proposal to expand redevelopment
zones into residential neighborhoods. Feels this proposal is nothing but a land grab to increase
agency revenue and that the "blight" label would bring strife to owners in the neighborhoods. He
urged the CVRC to strike these two proposals from the plan.
Peter Watry spoke on behalf of Crossroads II and addressed the U LI study. He urged the Board to
delete the item and gave a history of the study area and brought up the change in study area from
Fourth to 1-5 to Third and 1-5. These areas have all been studied in the Urban Core Specific Plan
which has been adopted. Our attitude is enough with the studies, enough with the planning; we
should be concerned with the plan as it is and try to get something done.
Earl Jensz is also a member of the working group and is opposed to the part of the plan to expand
redevelopment into the residential neighborhoods. Discussed redevelopment funds, generation
of property appreciation and transfers and how they divert money away from the General Fund.
Redevelopment has a history of problems which need to be fixed before any more money is
granted to the Redevelopment Agency. He gave examples of previous problems and again stated
that he was opposed to the expansion.
Patricia Aguilar complimented the Board on their service. Spoke on the feasibility to expand the
area and that the objective is to provide additional opportunities of affordable housing within the
redevelopment area. Would like the Board to consider if it is a good idea to have additional
affordable housing in areas of the city where there is already plenty of affordable housing. She
spoke about "balanced communities" as described in the General Plan and the desire to spread all
demographic levels and income levels throughout the city. Providing additional affordable
housing on the East side makes sense because it not only keeps our communities more balanced,
it increases opportunities for more market-rate housing on the West side, in the redevelopment
areas.
Page 5 on
CVRC - Minutes - December 10,2009
DRAFT
Director Paul addressed Ms. Aguilar's concerns and discussed additional housing in the project
areas and the desire to provide reports throughout the process.
Director Salas discussed expanding into the residential areas and the reasons and how/why it
should work. Also gave examples of how the development money could be used.
Director Reyes concurred with Director Salas, but is concerned with the citizen view. If we are
satisfied with status quo, then why does the CVRC exist? We need to work together and study the
opportunity of expanding the areas, and would it make the areas better?
Chair Lewis explained that the Redevelopment RDA plan is very restrictive in doing any kind of
redevelopment. His understanding is that we can give the existing homeowners money to repair
and update their properties while getting credits that translate into dollars to be reinvested. We
need to attract people here and need to be flexible in our plan in order to do that.
Director Reyes and Director Salas were asked to recuse themselves when staff gave a presentation
regarding an area in which they had a conflict. Staff presentation then continued and Director
Reyes (Merged Area) and Director Salas (Bayfront area) were excused at the appropriate times.
Questions from Board members Desrochers and Paul were answered by Manager Crockett and the
ULI study was discussed while Director Reyes was excused due to his conflict. Total budget cost
would be $120,000 and has been budgeted - not from the General Fund. Director Halbert
advised that parameters would have to be implemented so that they understood about the height
requirement. Manager Crockett added comments as to what the study would be and what kind of
information would be gleaned from it. Director Reyes returned and the resolutions read and
voted upon.
ACTION:
Director Paul moved to adopt CVRC Resolution No. 2009-013 and CVRC
Resolution No. 2009-014, heading read, text waived:
CVRC RESOLUTION NO. 2009- 013, RESOLUTION OF THE CHULA VISTA
REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDING TO THE CHULA
VISTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO ADOPT A FIVE YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE 2010-2014 FIVE YEAR PERIOD FOR THE
MERGED BAYFRONTITOWN CENTRE I REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
(INCLUDING BAYFRONT AND TOWN CENTRE I)
CVRC RESOLUTION NO. 2009-014, RESOLUTION OF THE CHULA
VISTA REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDING TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO ADOPT A FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN FOR THE 2010-2014 FIVE-YEAR PERIOD FOR THE MERGED
CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (INCLUDING TOWN
CENTRE II, SOUTHWEST, OTAY VALLEY, AND ADDED AREA)
Page 60f7
CYRC M inntes - December 10, 2009
DRAFT
Director Munoz seconded the motion and Resolution 2009-013 carried 5-1-1, with
Director Flores absent and Director Salas abstaining. Resolution 2009-014 carried 5-
1-1, with Director Flores absent and Director Reyes abstaining.
6. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORTS
CEO Halbert deferred to Redevelopment Manager Crockett, who announced to the
Board that Director Desrochers has been given a Lifetime Achievement Award by
the California Redevelopment Association and that it would be presented in
Pasadena in March of 2010.
7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORTS
There were none.
8. DIRECTORS' COMMENTS
Director Desrochers wanted confirmation that the meeting with the Sweetwater
Union High School District would be going forward on Monday at 1 :00 p.m.
Director Crockett is having the Planning Secretary, who originally set up the
meeting, contact them to confirm. From then on it is scheduled for every-other
Monday.
ADJOURNMENT
At 5:26 p.m., Chair Lewis adjourned the meeting to the Special Meeting of
January 14, 2010 at 4:00 p.m.
Eric Crockett, Secretary
Page 7 of7
CYRC - Minutes - December 10,2009