HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009/12/15 Item 20B
.:=Ere M ?e::> \':S
\;;;>./15/;>-009.
AI No.2 5 I 12/10/09
MTS Budget
. Operating budget impacted by-
. Lower than anticipated fare revenue (8% below FY 2010
budgeted)
. Lower than anticipated TDA and TransNet revenue (11.1 %
below FY 2010 budgeted)
Projected FY 2010 Operating Shortfall = $12.9 million
Projected FY 2011 Operating Shortfall = $14.4 million
Plan for balancing FY 2010 budget includes use of $12.6 million in
shifts from the Capital Program.
. Staff directed to evaluate service to provide $7 million in subsidy
savings
1
AI No. 25, 12/10/09
Background
November 5, 2009: Budget Development Committee adopts strategy that
looks specifically at Sunday service but maintains most services six
days/week.
November 12, 2009: Board authorizes today's public hearing and concurs
with BOG decision not to pursue another fare increase at this time.
Many alternatives reviewed (fare increases, weekday cuts, full route cuts,
etc.)
March 2009 considered $5 million across the board network cuts that
weren't implemented
Weekday cuts would affect more commuters, require more miles cut
per dollar saved than weekends
Sunday service proposal developed through use of Weekend Service
Analysis:
new, scaled-down network
preserves existing routes Man-Sat
some minor frequency, trip, span reductions Man-Sat
Weekend Service Analysis
. Every trip on every route counted, both Saturday & Sunday
- 2,566 hours of on-board counts
. Detailed trip- and stop-level data now available
. Passengers surveyed on how they use the system:
Medical
Sho in
Recreation
Religious
, ~. . eeoe
~TS , '
--~-- - - ---- - - ----- -------
2
AI No. 25 J 12/10/09
Why Sunday?
. Lowest number of passengers
. Highest percentage of flexible trips
(shopping, recreation, etc.)
. Lowest farebox recovery ratio: fewer service cuts
required for same subsidy savings
. Concentration of ridership in midday
. Avoids cutting any routes entirely
. Easier to rebuild system when budget improves
. Retains most regular riders (passholders)
I ,
I Q~S' eeoe:
L- .~ -_ _ ...___ ____ .___-'u__
Annual System-wide Ridership
""""
~
[] Weekday
. Saturday
. Sunday
Why Sunday?
System-wide Daily Ridership
]50,000
300,000 28Z,950
250,000
200,QOO f64,646
150,000 Iii
100,000
50,000
Weekday Saturday Sunday
, I
i Q~S' eeoe,
~Ii~
L______ _ ___ _ ..__ ____~u _
3
AI No.2 5 I 12/10/09
Sunday Network Development
. $7.0 million subsidy target established for service cuts
. Policy 42 requires analysis based on productivity and
passengers - not trip type or anecdotal data
. Data from Weekend Service analysis mapped in GIS
. Segments with most ridership prioritized for service
. Base system of routes laid out with 60 minute frequency and
a reduced span of 7am-7pm.
Nearby and overlapping segments consolidated
- Routes structured to mirror existing routes where poss.
Minor route changes made to cover high ridership areas
: Q,TS' eeoe I
I ~~
Ln.__ __. _~__ ~ _ __.n _ _ - .- '-
Sunday Network Development (cont'd)
. Frequency added (eg. 60 minute to 30 minute) in highest
ridership areas to avoid overcrowding, poor reliability
. Span added in areas with more demand for early or late
service (eg. Trolley service)
. Some final changes made using comments received from
passengers
. Other considerations...
. Available travel alternatives
- Title VI analysis
. System network connectivity
, ~.....~. eeoe I
I ",!' .ft,' i;7
, '~ 8 I
L........-___ _ __ __~ ___ _ _____ _ __ ____
4
,
LEGEND
Proposed Transit Service
-BusRoutes
-TrolleyRoutes
. TrolIeySotiom
Current Sunday Bus Boardlngs
'_15
:::=J16-30
031.50
051-15
076-100
0101150
1]2!1151-300
_301500
_500.1,000
B"I,ooo
"
,
~..... A
AI No. 25 J 12/10/09
S"HonnI-16lMM~
:J
tF
.-...:..... ~"jj""'" SUNDAY BUS RIDERSHIP
~ ~ ~ By Half-Mile Grid
""
l.EGEND
aOARDlNGS
lbylllt,....,o:tlonltr;1nsilctnMr)
O~~~op
r.!I. NOlw.thinlI4.ml1!
g 01 Proposed Stop
,
'- A
~:~$
~.
.....
I.
~
1
SUNDAY BUS RIDERSHIP
By Half-Mile Grid
5
AI No. 25/ 12/10/09
Challenges
. Some people do work on Sundays
. Passengers accessing religious services
. Truly transit dependent have limited travel
options
. No trips are 'discretionary' although some
are flexible
. Even for flexible trips, Sunday is the only
day for some people to run errands
i Q~S' eeoo
I -?"IIII\~ 11 I
'------- - ___ - ~ - _~__ ~_ ~ - _~ - I
Communication and Outreach
. 18 Events held at transit facilities Nov. 15 - Dec. 5
Press release generated media coverage
Received nearly 344 written/on-line surveys
. 30% identified Sunday as their most flexible day
Reached several thousand passengers
Handouts explaining proposals & budget issues
. I nformation on MTS website
. Comments also collected via hotline, mail, e-mail
. Notice of public hearing in newspaper
. 110,000 printed notices for vehicles
I Q~S' eeoo,
~~
1______ _~__ ___'2
6
AI No. 25, 12/10/09
18 Local
Outreach Events
Comments Received: 347 Total
- 120 by Telephone Hotline
- 113 by E-mail
- 8 via MTS Customer Service
- 93 from survey comment field
- 3 petitions received
- 10 by other means
All comments summarized for Board and
provided at hearing today.
i Q~S' eeoe,
Q " ,
--- - -- --~_~__ ____J
7
AI No.2 5 J 12/10/09
'~~S:F3\J~RY:26'1~O'SERVIG~E €AANGE P.ROI:'O$A~~ ~
$7.0 Million in Service Adjustments
Routes Affected:
WEEKDAYS: 12 bus routes, 1 Trolley line
SATURDAYS: 16 bus routes, 1 Trolley line
SUNDAYS: All bus routes and Trolley lines
One bus route (880) has major changes
I
i ~TS' 5800
.',,,;:1 I
- --- - - -~~- --- ----- - - ---
-0"'1>. '" ~, ~
W!'EKDAYS: ~... 1.., ~---jf ~'':''.' ~~"' x; ,"<1'.. :..~.~ ~'t -,i"..'",
Frequency Reduction
2 (Dwtn-North Park): Middays only
20 (1-15 Corridor Exp): Middays only
916/917 (Oak Park): 30 > 60
Other Reductions
50 Reduce trips at ends of peaks
860 Discontinue last NB trip
992 (Airport): end service at 11 pm
Blue Line: Reduce peaks, late nights
Modified Route
2 Move downtown terminal
30 No service downtown after 7pm
210 Move downtown terminal
854 (La Mesa-San Carlos)
874/875 No Granite Hills after 6pm
880 Serve downtown, not UTC
929 Terminate dwtn at City College
Discontinue All Service
None
Q~TS' 5800 I
,~
. ~_ _~___~__~~~ ~ __, __ __ .1
8
AI No.2 5 I 12/10/09
"'"' - -~ .I ,.; - "'" ~ -.... ~ <> ,
:S~TURp~~:~~ ~:: '-g,;,.C;J: ~.;. ...:w,:" ~L.-:'t^- }~,'W, ~ ~';" :,",,_,,",,:;'~..!; 'iI..
Frequency Reduction
2 (Dwtn-North Park): 15> 20
7 (Dwtn-Univ Av-La Mesa): 12 > 15
8/9 (Old Town-Mission/P.B.): 20 > 30
10 (Oid Town-Univ Av): 15> 20
11 (Skyline-Dwtn-SDSU): 20 > 30
15 (Dwtn-ECB-SDSU): 15> 20
20 (1-15 Corridor Exp): 30> 60
27 (P.B.-Kearny Mesa): 60 > 90
88 (Hotel Circle): 30 > 60
105 (Clairemont): 30 > 60
874/875 (EI Cajon): 30 > 60
967/968 (Nan City): 60 > 120
992 (Airport): 15 > 30
Modified Route
10 No service east of 15 Fwy
27 No service east of Convoy St
30 Old Town-VA only (no Dwtn, UTe)
41 End route at UTC (no UCSD)
105 No svc north of Clairemont Sq
874/875 No service to Granite Hills
Other Reductions
955 Fewer early AM., evening trips
992 End service at 11 pm
Discontinue All Service
None
i ~TS' eeoe I
I ~~;:f J
- - ------------------- ---
_.' S -. r... ." ., . ,- ',' -
S...WNQA..'(---=-.fr~..~,,1,'ii.i,~ ,~,' ~~ ,,'\.. ,<>. 'w t~)":1: .:.t ...."" -. ..
Frequency Reduction
19routes: 2 3 4 7 8/9 10 13 15
2028 44 815 874/875 901 932
961 992 Orange Green
Span Reduction
33 routes: 1 2 3 4 5 7 8/9 10
11 13 15 20 28 30 35 41 44
105 120 815 864 874/875 901
929 932 933/934 936 955 961
992 Blue Orange Green
Route Modification
7 routes: 2 13 15 20 35 44 709
Shortened Routes
(large reduction)
17routes: 1 3 78/9 10 11 30 41
105 120 864 874/875 901 929
932 933/934 961
Discontinue Sunday Service
26 routes: 6 27 88 115 701 704
705 712 832 833 845 848
854 855 856 872 904 905
916/917 921 923 928 962
965 967 968
I QTS' eeoel
I ~~ I
- - -- ------- - ---- -- --~~- -- -- - --
9
AI No. 25, 12/10/09
Impacts of Proposed Changes
",,~ekda.L Saturclay
~~~.f~'
287,950 f 164,64E~j 131,875
: =----..-----.-=-__",1 ...~ _"... .,....' " ....=-<.""""
73,139,300,. 8,561,592 i 7,780,625
7,140; 31,288L_~1,872
1,813,560f 1 ,626.976l'7~7s0.625
1,098'1.. .4.:.32~L_ 32,7,18
,- . .~..~.. :;r.-.....=... "-'"
278,892' 224.900 I 1,930,352
0.4%1 2.6% I: 24.8%
3.4%1 106% I' 49.7%
2.8% 'I 11.4% I' 50.5%
Current Daily
Ridership Annual
Riders Daily
Affected Annual
Riders Daily
Lost Annual
% Ridership Lost
% Miles Discontinued
% Hours Discontinued
: ~,TS' eeoo I
l 7/111~ ______ _ __ __ _ __ _ __ _ ~_19 _ I
Sunday Religious Services
During the Sunday morning & midday periods, there
are 1,837 ons and 1,581 offs at stops within %.mile
of religious facilities that will no longer be served.
This represents just over 2% of all Sunday ridership.
77.5% of religious facilities currently served within a
half mile would still be served.
: Q,TS' eeoo :
I ~/r.~
. _ ~ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _~__ _ ___ _ __2~__ j
10
AI No. 25, 12/10/09
Major Service Changes
. Defined by Federal Transit Administration
guidelines
. Any changes that affect more than 25% of a
route's hours or miles
. Require a public hearing
. Includes one of the routes recommended today
for changes (Route 880)
I' Q~S' eeoo'
4~
L-______ ______~______ _~__ _21__
1l.anch>u.fNldo.l
45 Ranch - University City
via 50rrento Valley
- Fully subsidized by 45 Ranch
- Average 6 passengers/trip
- Proposed Changes:
. Re-route to serve
downtown instead of
50rrento Valley and
University City
. Reduce from three
round trips to two
~
(S(8@
"~R-.ndl
RJ"Cho
~.nr. fo
--
""'"5:;-
MlF,,"",",
-
,-.
I ~TS'
~ - -------- - -
. -.;:m..,.. C". M_....
:...-. .~ ""- \..
"""-".~. \; .
,:,':i~ , \,
jJ un,:!!~>lY
"=....
-
11
AI No.2 5 J 12/10/09
Title VI Analysis
. One route with major service change (Route 880):
proposed changes could impact low-income and
minority (L1M) populations more than non-L1M
populations.
. L1M impact is to Mira Mesa and UTC areas, also bridged
by Route 921; actual riders are from non-L1M tracts.
. This change would have less impact on L1M
communities than the readily possible alternatives.
. Complete Title VI analysis included within agenda
packet.
: Q"TS' eeoe
I ~//J1~ I
- - - - - -- --- - -- -- - -
LEGEND
r
~ edE.cpressRoule
Percentage of Population
Either Low-lncome or MInority
D<25%
.......,
D25'llo_51B11i.Tr.ldS ...
051.8'%-751lo LN ,...
_>'5% =!WIDAG
uS-"-~
'-
---
--
~-~-
-~
-~-
--
_ TITLE VIANA LYSIS.Proposed RO:,Jle --.- I ~_.- I
i~.'... _ 45 Ranch. Rancho Bernardo. u"' I ....,.... '""""" ... n~::.:~~",:, "",.,..
<']'; . .1. .;;P;: "'"'5::..... ;;n... ~.
SorrentoValley-UTC _. ..._ _.__...._. .._._
12
AI No.2 5 1 12/10/09
Percentage ot Populallon
Either l.ow.lncome or Minority
.C]<25'Jl. Nofl.L1M ~
D2S'4.S18'lOTrod$ A
DS1.8%-lS%TI~lS
_>15% -..&.W:Mc;
(1.$ e..-I:'l>l>:lI
-
-\
it!!J
LEGE NO
P'roposed(xpressRoute
....
Q a~ H
~..
<:I
F_~CUo
.~"'...tt_
"~
Recommendations
. Conduct a public hearing on recommended service
adjustments to achieve at least $7.0 million in
subsidy savings (as described in Attachment A)
. Adopt Resolution 09-27, "Findings in Support of
Exemption Under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Related to Proposed Budget-
Related Service Adjustments" (Attachment C)
. Respond to suggestions made by the public and take
action (if any) on the package of service adjustments
at the next regularly scheduled Board meeting on
January 7,2010
I ,
i Q~S' eeool
, .~I;:I I
~--- --- ---~--------
13
AI No. 25, 12/10/09
14