The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2009/12/15 Item 10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~(~ CITY OF . .-- (HULA VISTA DECEMBER 15, 2009, Item 10 SUBMITTED BY: REPORT REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT IlvIPACT FEE, PARK ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT FEE, AND TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 DEPUTY ~J\i[ANAGERlDEVELOPMENT SERVICES MANAGER ~m, DIRECTOR 0 FINANCE/TREASU . '''' DlIWCTOROf~C~ . CITY MANAGE -;?O- ~ ASSISTANT CIT . MAl \lAGER 7) ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: SUMMARY State Government Code Section 66000 requires local agencies assessing Development Impact Fees (DIF) and sewer capacity charges to make available specified financial data to the public each fiscal year. These reports satisfy that requirement and have been available in the City Clerk's office for public review since December 4, 2009 . We have also included the report on Parkland Acquisition.and Development (PAD) fees in the same report for ease of reference and convenience to the public. 4/STHS VOTE: YES D NO I X I Local agencies are also required to make findings every five years for any DIF funds remaining unexpended that identify the purpose of the fee and demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for vvhich it was charged. This year, the City has not identified unexpended fees that were on deposit for five or more years. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that filing of this annual '-' Oreport is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section l5060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the actions proposed are not subject to CEQA. Although environmental review is not necessary at this time, once projects that will be funded 10-1 DECEMBER 15, 2009, Item~ Page 2 of? through the DIFs have been defined, environmental review will be required and a CEQA determination completed prior to commencing any projects. RECOIVIMENDA TION Council accepts the'report. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. DISCUSSION The City of Chula Vista collects several types of Development Impact Fees (DIF), Parkland Acquisition and Development fee, and Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve fee, which were assessed during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009. The major categories of facilities financed via DIF include transportation, traffic signals, pedestrian bridges, drainage, sewer, and public facilities. Development Impact Fees are updated in two manners, either via a comprehensive DIF program review, or via a Council enacted automatic annual adjustment, based upon an appropriate index. No DIF programs were comprehensively updated during the subject fiscal year. In October of 2008, the following automatic index based annual adjustments went into effect: . Transportation DIF was increased from $10,777 to $ll,317'per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). . Traffic Signal fee was increased from $28.55 to $29.75 per average daily vehicle trip. . Otay Ranch Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF was increased from $1,930 to $2,033 per single-family dwelling unit. . Parkland Acquisition and Development fee was increased from $9,249 to $9,428 for Areas West of 1-805 and $16,931 to $17,11 0 for Areas East ofI-805 A new Transportation DIF fee was also adopted last year that is applicable to development west of the Interstate 805 freeway. The Western Transportation Development Impact Fee (WTDIF) was approved by Council on March 4, 2008, with an initial fee of $3,243 per EDU. Other fees addressed in this report remain at the same rate as the previous fiscal year. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (TDlF) This fee was adopted on January 12, 1988 by Ordinance 2251 to fmance and coordinate the construction of new transportation facilities so that streets are built when needed. This fee is ___applicable to all new development east of Interstate 805. Prior to the program, streets were built by developers in a fragmented fashion with 6-lane facilities, necking down to 2-lanes and expanding back to 6 lanes again. In addition, there was a fairness issue since some developers fronted on large streets and others did not. Now all developers in the Eastern pOliion of Chula Vista pay the same fee per dwelling unit and either the City constructs the street or a developer 10-2 DECEMBER IS, 2009, ltem~ Page 3 of7 does. If the developer constructs the street they will receive a TO IF fee credit when they apply for a building permit. The TDIF program was last comprehensively updated in 2005, increasing the fee per EDU to $10,050. This fee was subject to an annual index-based adjustment; in October of 2008 the fee was increased to $11,317 per EDU. The fees for other land use types, as well as detailed FY 2008/09 financial information, are presented in Attachment A, Schedule 1. WESTERt~ TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPlVIENT IMPACT FEE (WTDIF) This fee was adopted on March 18, 2008 by Ordinances 3106 to 3110 to finance and coordinate the construction of new transportation facilities on the westside of the City as well as spread the costs associated with the construction of the facilities equitably among the developing properties within the benefit area. This fee is applicable to all new development west of Interstate 805. This fee is subject to an annual index-based adjustment in July I of each year beginning in 2009. The fees for other land use types, as well as detailed FY 2008/09 financial information, are presented in Attachment A, Schedule 2. TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEE This fee was adopted to provide for the projected traffic signal needs of the City that result from increases in traffic volume caused by development. As funds are accumulated they are expended on traffic signal projects. This citywide fee is assessed per trip generated, and was increased from $28.55 to $29.75 per trip in October 2008. Detailed FY 2008/09 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 3. TELEGRAPH CAJ'><"YON DRAINAGE DIF This fee is applicable to all new development within the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin and has remained unchanged since 1998. Detailed FY 2008/09 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 4. TELEGRAPH CANYON GR.\ VITY SEWER DIF This fee is for the expansion of the tnmk sewer within the basin for tributary properties. The fee has remained unchanged at $216.50 per EDU since 1998. Detailed FY 2008/09 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 5. POGGI CANYON SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE __ __ This fee was adopted to provide the necessary fmancing to construct a trunk sewer in the Poggi ===Canyon Sewer Basin trom a proposed regional trunk sewer west of Interstate 805 along Olympic Parkway to the boundary of Eastlake. The fee was established at $400 per equivalent dwelling unit and has remained unchanged since 1997. Detailed FY 2008/09 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 5. 10-3 DECEMBER 15, 2009, Item~ Page 4 of7 SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE This fee was adopted to provide the necessary financing to construct the Salt Creek Interceptor. This fee is applicable to the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, a portion of the Upper Otay Lake Basin north of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, Wolf Canyon Basin, and a portion of the Lower Otay Lake Basin east of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin. The fee for FY 2008/09 was $1,330 per EDU under Ordinance 2974-A dated August 17, 2004. Detailed FY 2008/09 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 5. OTAY R>\NCH VILLAGE 1, 2, 5, & 6 PEDESTRIAi"," BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE This fee was adopted to provide the necessary financing to construct the facilities. The fee program was amended in February 2007 to include Otay Ranch Village 2. This action amended both the program's area of benefit and facility list. Construction costs were also revised and a new fee of $1,114 per EDU was established and has remained unchanged. Detailed FY 2008/09 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 6. OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 11 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE This fee was adopted to provide the necessary financing to construct four pedestrian bridges in Otay Ranch Village 11. This fee was increased from $1,930 to $2,033 per EDU in October of 2008. Detailed FY 2008/09 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 6. PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF The Public Facilities DIF is a citywide fee with several components levied to fund that portion of public facilities projects attributable to new development. The total fee for all components was increased in October 2008 from $8,136 to $8,735 per EDU. Detailed FY 2008/09 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 7. The active components of the Public Facilities DIF with the current fees are as follows: ADMINISTRATION ($563) - Administration of the Public Facilities DIF program, overseeing of expenditures and revenues collected, preparation of updates, calculation of costs, etc. CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION ($2,458) - Expansion of the Civic Center per the 1989 Civic Center Master Plan to provide sufficient building space and parking due to growth and development. The Civic Center Master Plan was updated in July 200 I to include the Otay Ranch impacts. POLICE FACILITY ($1,565) - Accommodation of the building space needs per the, Civic Center Master Plan, which included the newly constructed police facility, upgrading of the communications center and installation of new communication consoles. Also included is the purchase and installation of a computer aided dispatch system (CAD), Police Records Management System, and Mobile Data Terminals. 10-4 DECEMBER 15, 2009, Item~ Page 5 of 7 CORPORATION YARD RELOCATION ($421) - Relocation of the City's Public Works Center from the bay front area to the more centrally located site on Maxwell Road. LIBRARIES ($1,413) - Improvements include construction of the South Chula Vista library and Eastern Territories libraries, and installation of a new automated library system. This component is based on the updated Library Master Plan. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM ($1,243) - Projects include the relocation of Fire Stations 3 and 4, construction of a fire training tower and classroom, purchase of a brush rig, installation of a radio communications tower and construction of various fire stations in the Eastern section of the City. This fee also reflects the updated Fire Station Master Plan, which includes needs associated with the Otay Ranch development. MAJOR RECREATION FACILITIES ($1,072) - New component adopted in November 2002 to build major recreation facilities created by new development such as community centers, gymnasiums, swimming pools, and senior/teen centers. Although the majority of project costs are to be borne by new development, it is important to note that various components or specific projects within a component contain both a City and new development cost share. The City share often reflects "joint impetus" projects, which are necessitated by growth and non-growth factors andJor the City's obligation to correct pre- existing space/equipment deficiencies. The PFDIF fees only relate to new development's cost share for each component. PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD) FEES This in-lieu fee was adopted by the City to acquire neighborhood and community parkland and to construct parks and recreational facilities. The Parkland Acquisition and Development fee was increased in October 2008 from $9,249 to $9,428 for Areas West ofI-805 and $'16,931 to $17,110 for Areas East of I-80S. Detailed FY 2008/09 financial information is presented on Attachment B. TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FEES This fee was established to pay all or part of the cost and expense to enlarge sewer facilities of the City so as to enhance efficiency of utilization andJor adequacy of sewer capacity. Detailed FY 2008/09 financial information is presented on Attachment C. FY 2008-09 FINANCIAL Ii';""FORlvIATION Attachment A, Schedules 1 through 6 reports the required financial information for all DIF, other than the Public Facilities DIF. Attachment A, Schedule 7 reports the required financial information for the Public Facilities DrF and its components. Attachment B reports the required 10-5 DECEMBER 15, 2009, Item~ Page 6 of7 financial information for the PAD fees. Attachment C reports the required information for the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve fees. The schedules contain the following items: o The beginning balances as of July 1,2008. o The fees received during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. o Other miscellaneous revenues received during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. o The interest earned from investing the cash balances available in each fund during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. o The expenditures from each of the funds during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. o A description of each capital project with expenditures funded entirely or in part by DIF/PAD/Trunk Sewer in FY 2008/09 and the percentage of the project funded by this fee through FY 2008/09. More detailed information on any project is available in the annual Capital Improvement Project.(CIP) Budget. o Information on any loans from DIF/P AD/Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve funds during FY 2008/09. o Theending balances as of June 30, 2009 for each of the DIF/PAD/Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Funds. o The amount, description and purpose of the fee. o An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence. The ending balances as of June 30, 2009 are in the process of being audited as part of the audit of citywide financial statements, and are therefore subject to adjustment. FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR FUNDS IN POSSESSION OVER 5 YEARS Government Code Section 6600 I (d) requires the local agency to make findings every five years with respect to any portion of the DIF fees remaining unexpended to identify the purpose for which it was charged. There are no funds currently on account remaining unexpended for five or more years, therefore no additional tmding is necessary. Copies of this report were sent to the Building Industry Association of San Diego, the Eastlake Development Company, the McMillin Companies, the Otay Ranch Company, the Otay Land Company, Trimark Pacific Homes and Brookfield Homes. DECISION MAKER CO~'FLICT Staff has determined that the action contemplated by this item is ministerial, secretarial, manual, or clerical in nature and does not require the City Council members to make or participate in making a governmental decision, pursuant to California Code of Regulations section 18702.4(a). Consequently, this item does not present a conflict under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't -Code S 871 00, ei seq.). 10-6 DECEMBER 15, 2009, Item~ Page 7 00 CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT This is an informational report and there IS no fiscal impact associated with accepting or rej ecting this report. ON GOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact in future years. ATTACHMENTS A. Schedules I through 7: FY 2008-09 Financial Information for all DIFs including Public Facilities DIF B. FY 2008-09 Financial Information for PAD fees C. FY2008-09 Financial Information for Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve fees Prepared by: Karim Galeana, Senior Accountant, Finance Departn'lent 10-7 01' ill " ill ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 1 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF) FY 08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: To finance the construction of traffic and transportation improvements in support of future development. Amount of the Fee: $ 11.317 9.054 6.791 181,074 90.542 per single family equivalent dwelling unit detached per single family equivalent dwelling unit attached (med density) per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit per ganeral commercial gross acre per industrial gross acre FY 08/09 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 591 ~ TRANSPORTATION DIF 0 I CD Beginning Balance. 07101/08 $ 24.251,004 TDIF Fees Collected 226.441 Transportation Stale Share Interest Earned 682.889 Miscellaneous Revenues Forgiveness of debt Transfer-In Expenditures: Supplies & Seri/ices (1,578) City Staff Services (407.653) SR-125 DIF Refunds (2007-182) Debt Payment - Calease Fiscal Sys Transfer-Out- 2003 Refunding COP (277) CIP Project Expenditures (357.175) Unaudited Ending Balance. 06/30/09 $ 24.393.651 :' ATIACHMENT A SCHEDULE 1.1 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF) FY 08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 08/09 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT Total Appropriation Future % Of Project Initially PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/09 Appropriations Funded by TDIF Scheduled OP208 CIP Mngmnt & Equipment Purchase 18,961 70,000 48.94% 2009 STL261 Willow St Bridge Widening 131,229 1,087,740 48.94% 1999 STM331 98 E. Orange Extension 28,166 4,459,904 99.47% 1999 STM346 Interim SR-125 Facility Phase I 662 196,572 35.00% 2003 STM350 South Circulation Network 189 155,000 100.00% 2003 ~ STM351 Main SI Dual Left Turn Ln-160 750 2,214,117 100.00% 2002 0 STM355 Otay Lakes Road Widening, East H to Canyon 26,654 1,400,000 100.00% 2003 I ~ STM356 Ramp Widening on E. H St and 1-805 Northbound 288 3,333,240 98.74% 2004 0 STM357 Rock Mtn Rd - Heritage to La Media 291 232,000 91.23% 2004 STM364 Heritage Road Bridge Reconstrc 76,331 1,820,000 52.00% 2007 TF274 Traffic Count Stations 8,736 210,000 100.00% 2002 TF325 Transportation Planning Program 49,004 220,000 69.00% 2007 TF357 SRI25 Corridor and Arterial Ops 667 50,000 100.00% 2007 TF364 TDIF (Trans Dev Impact Fund) Update 15,245 125,000 100.00% 2007 TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ 357,175 Descriotion of Loan Outstanding Loan Amount Interest Rate Advance to Weslern Transportation DIF approved via Council approved FY09 budget 180,000 2.71% Advance to PFDIF (General Administration) approved by Council Resoiution #2008-300 on December 16. 2008 5,200,000 3.80% ~ o I ~ ~ II II H ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 2 WESTERN TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF) FY 08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES $ Description of Fee: To finance the construction of traffic and transportation improvements in support of future development. Amount of the Fee: 3,243 2,594, 1,946 64,860 194,580 FY 08/09 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: Beginning Ba'lance, 07/01/08 WTDIF Fees Collected Interest Earned Transfer-In Expenditures: Supplies & Services City Staff Services CIP Project Expenditures Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/09 FY 08/09 CIP EXPENDITURES: per single family equivalent dwelling unit detached per single family equivalent dwelling unit attached (med density) per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit per regional commercial gross acre per high rise office gross acre FUND 593 WESTERN TRANSPORTATION DIF $ 32,818 1,549 180,000 (54,858) $ 159,509 PROJECT Total Appropriation Future % Of Project Initially PROJECT DESCRIPTION, EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/09 Appropriations Funded by TDIF Scheduled STL349 UC Bike Path/Ped Accss Std 3rd 54,077 55,000 20,00% 2009 TF363 Western TDIF Bayfronl Update 781 125,000 100,00% 2009 TOTAL CiP EXPENDITURES $ 54,858 ~ o I ~ N " ATIACHMENT A SCHEDULE 3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: For City's traffic signal needs resulting from increased traffic volume caused by new development. Amount of the Fee: $ 29,75 pertrip FY 08/09 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 225 TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUND Beginning Balance, 07/01/08 $ 4,246,666 Traffic Signai Fees Coilected Federal Grant Interest Earned Miscellaneous Revenues Transfer-In Expenditures: City Staff Services Other Refunds Transfer-Out - 2003 Refunding COP CIP Project Expenditures 247,626 129,332 Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/09 $ (6,297) (3,156) (336) (708,448) 3,905,765 I' " II ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 3.1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 08109 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 08/09 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT Total Appropriation Future % Of Project Funded initially PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/09 Appropriations by Traffic Signal DIF Scheduled OP208 CIP Mngmnt & Equipment Purchase 18,961 30,000 19.00% 2009 TF300 Traffic Signallnstl Hilltop / Oxford 687 449,401 100.00% 2003 ~ TF316 Signai Installation-2nd & Quintard 1,589 200,000 100.00% 2003 0 TF317 Inters Impvl-Bonita Rd & Allen School Lane 5,961 181,351 100.00% 2004 I ~ TF330 Traffic Modification 4th / Main & 4th / Beyer 118,845 627,000 . 100.00% 2006 t.) TF331 Traffic Modification 3rd / Montgomery 83,041 370,000 100.00% 2006 TF335 Traffic Signallnstallalion Brandywine & Sequoia 221,966 342,000 100.00% 2007 TF337 Traffic Left Turn Modification Program 5,809 176,649 100.00% 2006 TF348 Accessible Pedeslrian Signal Facilities Upgrade 13,107 251,757 100.00% 2008 TF349 Traffic Signal Modification 1st Ave. E St.lnterseCtion 4,377 670,000 100.00% 2008 TF354 Traffic Congestion Relief Program 15,793 50,000 225,000 13.00% 2008 TF355 1805 Corridor Improvement Arterial Ops 11,529 25,000 33.33% 2008 TF360 Hwy Safety Imprv Prog Mjr Intr 99,009 100,000 10.00% 2009 TF366 Trafc Sgnl & Stlight Upgrd/Mtn 103,640 153,003 44.00% 2009 TF369 Three Park Bicycle Fac Improv 4,134 11,000 7.00% 2009 TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ 708,448 ~ a I ~ "'" " 'i " it SCHEDULE 4 TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF (TC DRAINAGE DIF) FY 08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ATIACHMENT A Description of Fee:.\ For construction of Telegraph Canyon channel between Paseo ladera and the Eastlake Business Center and for a portion of the channel west of 1-805, Amount of the Fee: $ 4,579 per acre FY 06109 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: Beginning Balance, 07/01/06 Te Drainage Fees Collected I ntereat Earned Trl;lnsfer-In Expenditures: Debt Service Payment to 03 Refunding COP elP Project Expenditures Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30109 ' FY 06/09 CIP EXPENDITURES, PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT EXPENDITURES Total Appropriation as of 6/30/09 FUND 542 TC DRAINAGE DIF $ 5,787,520 $ 537 191,196 (69) (60,878) 5,91B,308 Future Appropriations % Of Project funded by DIF Initially Scheduled DR116 94 Telegraph Canyon Channellmpvts DR167 Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study Third (\ L 48,558 12,320 3,919,026 1,251,000 1994 2006 TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ 60,878 100.00% 100.00% ~ D I ~ (11 'II , , III ;11 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 5 SEWER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Telegraph Canyon Gnivily Sewer DIF (TC Gravity Sewer DIF) Fund 431 Pumped Sewer DIF (Pumped Sewer DIF) Fund 543 Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin DIF (PC Sewer Basin DIF) Fund 432 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF (SC Sewer Basin DIF) Fund 433 Description of Fee: Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer DIF: Pumped Sewer DIF: For the expansion of trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties. For construction of facilities necessary to provide sewer service to developments within the pumped flow basin. For the planning, design, construction and/or financing of the facilities. . For the construction of a trunk sewer in the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin from a proposed regional trunk sewer west of 1-805 along Olympic Parkway to the boundary of Eastlake. Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF: Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin DIF: Amount of the fee: per single family equivalent dwelling unit detached per single family equivalent dwelling unit attached per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit Commercial land use Industrial land use Fund 431 TC Gravity Sewer DI F $ 216.50 $ 216.50 162.38 $216.50/edu $216.50/edu Fund 432 Fund 433 PC Sewer SC Sewer Basin DIF Basin DIF 400.00 $ 1,330.00 400.00 1,330.00 300.00 997.50 $400/edu $1330/edu $400/edu $1330/edu :i , q ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 5.1 SEWER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 08/09 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: ~ . Restated Beginning Baiance, 07/01/08 DIF Fees Coilected I nterest Earned Transfer-In Expenditures: City Staff Services Depreciation Expense - Infrastructure Oakwood Development Refunds (2008-261 & 2009-00, Interest Paid Transfer Out to Fund 413 Transfer Debt Service CIP Project Expenditures o I ~ en Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/09 . Nole _ there was an increase of $2,280,000 in the beginning balance for FY09 when compared the ending balance in FY08. The increase is due to the conversion entry from a Special Rev Fund to a Sewer Funds. FY 08/09 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT Tolal Appropriation EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/09 Future Appropriations % Of Project Funded Inltiaily by DIF Scheduled Fund 432- Poaa; Canvon Sewer Basin DIF SW226 Upgrade-Reach 205 of Poggi Cyn Tnk Sew 27,773 582,291 29.10% 2002 TOTAL CiP EXPENDITURES $ 27,773 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 6 OTAY RANCH PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FY 08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Olay Ranch Village 1, 2, 5 & 6 Pedestrian Bridge DIF (OR Viii & 5 Pedestrian Bridge DIF), Fund 587 Otay Ranch Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF (OR Vil11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF), Fund 588 Description of Fee: OR Village 1 & 5 Pedestrian Bridge DIF: To finance the construction of pedestrian bridge improvement between Olay Ranch Villages 1, 5 & 6. OR Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF: To finance the construction of pedestrian bridge improvement in Otay Ranch Village 11. Amount of the fee: --' o I --' .... Fund 587 OR Village 1, 2, 5 & 6 Ped Bridge DIF Fund 588 OR Village 11 Ped Bridge DIF per single family equivalent dwelling unit detache $ per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit $ 1,114.00 $ 826.00 $ 2,033.00 1,510.00 FY 08/09 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 587 FUND 588 OTAY RANCH DIF OTAY RANCH DIF Beginning Balance, 07/01/08 $ 9,843 $ 2,100,657 DIF Fees Collected 45,536 Interest Earned (8,727) 72,285 Olay Parkway Ped. Bridge (2008-102) City Staff Services (919) (1,251) Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/09 $ 197 $ 2.217,227 :1 . q SCHEDULE 7 .PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (PFDlF) FY 08/09 STATEMENT OF FUND BALANCE Description of Fee and amount: Admislfalion ($563) _ Administration of the Public Facililies D1F program, overseeing 01 expenditures and revenues collected, proparation of updates, calculation of casts, etc. Civic Center 'Expansion {$2.458l ~ Expansion of the 1969 Civic Center per the Civic Cenler Masler Plan to provide sufficient building space and pl1r1dng due to growth and development. The Civic Center Master Plan was updated tn July 2001 to include the OIay Ranch Impacts. Police Facility ($1,565). Accommodation of the building space needs per the Civic Center Master Plan, which Included the newly constructed pollee lacillly. upgrading of the communications cenler and installation of new communicallon consoles. Also Included is the purchase and Installation of a computor aided dispatch system (CAD), Police Records Management System, and MobHe Data Terminals. Corporation Yard Relocation {$421} _ Relocation of the GUy's Public Works Center from the bay Ironl area to the more centrally located slle on Maxwell Road. lIbrarlos ($1.413) _ Impro'lement6lnclude construction of lhe South Chula Vista library and Eastern TerrItories libraries, and InslallaUon of a new aulomated ~brary system, This componontls based on tha updated Library Master Plan. Fire Suppression System ($1,243) _ Projects include lhe reJocaUon of Fire Stations #3 & #4, construction of a IJre traIning (ower and classroom, purchase of a brush rig, installation 01 a radio communIcations tower and construction of various fire staUons In the Eastern section of the CUy. This fee also rellects the updated Fire Station Master Plan, which includes needs associated with the Otay Ranch development. ..... o I ..... Major HecreaUon FaciJilles ($1,072) _ Now component adopted in November 2002 to build major recreation facllillos created by new development such as communlly centen., gymnasiums, swImming pools, and senior/teen centers. 00 Pollco Corp Yard Fir6Supp. Roc. Gen. Admil. CtvicCanler(l) Facility Reloca~on liJrarles System Fllcllijlo& 571 667/672 573 57' 576 576 '" TOTAL Beginning Balance, 07/0110B $ (2,364,463) $ 9,656,269 $ 251,889 $ 3,968.773 $ 7,768,168 $(17,371,065) $ (6,359,341) $(4,269:110) HovonuQs: DIF Re\lenues 54,001 177 ,667 126,843 35,640 103,845 105,137 92,661 695,794 InVBlllmull1 Eamll1U6 6,451 292,319 16,005) 132,391 261,191 (611,765) (222,992) (151,410) OtllcfHevenue 1,293,026 562 " 1,293,609 Relmbursemanl- Olh AgencIes Tranbltlrln 5,200,000 1 ~528,969 6,726,969 Expendllures: Personnel Services Tola! SUpplios....SlUVices (37) (37) City Staff Services 1220,166) (220,166) Other Refunds (10,309) (7,452) (1,664) (6,122) (4,470) 14,647) (34,664) Capital ExpemJlluras CIP Project EKpenallures (472,048) (472,048) TrallsfarOul (277) (2313.701l (1167338) (962,210) (183) (4443.769) Unaudited Emling Balance, 06/30/0 $ 2,655,467 $10.352,154 $ (605,0631.$ 3,172,910 $ 8,127,644 $(17,882,327) $(6,494,319) $; 1673,514) NOTE: (1) This fund Includes the amount set asIde for the acqulslUon or the Adamo property In Fund 567. Transrerln of $1.52BM Is an andvance from the General Fund ~ o I ~ CD ,il It: ill FY 08/09 PFDIF CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT Total Appropriation Future % of Project Funded Initially EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/09 Appropriations by PFDIF Scheduled CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION - Fund 567/572 00300 Civic Center Expansion Project Phase III SCHEDULE 7.1 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF (PFDIF) FY 08/09 SCHEDULE OF DETAILED EXPENDITURES ATTACHMENT A 472,048 11,467,265 TOTAL EXPENDITURES-CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION LOANS: $ 472,048 100.00% 2006 ..... o I N o ,.'1 Ii " " i ~ ATTACHMENT B PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD FEES) FY 08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: In lieu fee for providing neighborhood community park and recreational facilities. Arees East of 1-805 Amount of the Fee: $ 17,110 per single family dwelling unit 12,698 per multi-family dwelling unil 8,008 per mobile home dwelling unil 7,320 per motel/hotel dwelling unit Areas Wesl of 1-805 Amounl of the Fee: $ 9.428 per single family dwelling unil 6,997 per mulli-family dwelling unit 4.413 per mobile home dwelling unil 4,033 per motel/hotel dwelling unil FY 08/09 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 715 PAD FUND Beginning Balance, 07/01/08 $ 39,581,584 Revenues: Park Dedication Fees Interest Earned Transfer in from CIP fund Expenditures: Supplies and Services Other Expenses CIP Project Expendilures 515,677 1,260,007 (10,000) (1,193,670) (4,689,786) Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/09 $ 35,463,812 ,,' ." Ni ATIACHMENT B1 PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD FEES) FY 08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 08/09 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT Total Appropriation Future % Of Project Funded Initially PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES at 6/30/09 Appropriations by PAD Fees Scheduled PR251 Salt Creek (EL) Community Park 284 8.293,229 98.80% 2003 PR260 San Miguel Ranch Community Park 4,603.577 8,959,785 100.00% 2007 PR261 Olay Ranch Community Park 42,417 697,764 100.00% 2009 PR262 Parks Master Plan Update 2,010 50,000 24.60% 2005 ~ PR279 All Seasons park 17,508 449,459 100.00% 2007 C) PR303 Sunset View Park Roller Hockey Rink Modf 10,137 150.000 100.00% 2009 I PR308 P-3 Neighborhood Park (ORV2) 6,535 122,000 100.00% 2009 N ~ PR309 P-2 Neighborhood Park (ORV2) 7,318 122.000 100.00% 2009 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 4.689,786 Note: The ending balance includes fees paid by specific developers for specific parks within those development. These parks include Salt Creek Park. Montevalle Park, Mt. Miguel Park, Mountain Hawk, end tha Otay Ranch Community Park. " :1 " II TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FY08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: For the enlargement of sewer facililies of the City so as to enhance efficiency of utilization and/or adequacy of capacity and for planning and/or evaluating any future proposals for area wide sewage treatment and or water reclamation systems or facilities. Amount Df the Fee: $ 3.478 per equivalent dwelling unit 01 Ilow when developing or mDdifylng use of any residential property FY 08/09 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: ~ FUND 413 TRUNK SEWER (TS) o I "" "" $ 178,240,206 1 ,275,821 2,738,686 660,969 470,556 . Restated Beginning Balance, 07/01/08 Interest Eamed DevelDper Infrastructure DDnatiDns Sewerage Facility Participant Fees Transfer In frDm 432 Expenditures: Depreciation Expense M Infrastructure CIP Project Expenditures (5,081,554) (52,011) Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/09 $ 178,252,673 ATTACHMENTC . Note ~ there was an increase of $145,739,095 in the beginning balance tor FY09 when compared the ending balance in FY08. The increase-is due to the conversion entry from a Special Rev Fun-d to a Sewer Funds. " " " i! AlTACHMENTC.1 TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FY08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES. FY 08/09 EXPENDITURES: PROJECT Total Approp. Future % Of Projeot Funded Initially PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES at 6/30/09 Appropriations by TRUNK SEWER Scheduled OP203 Property and Easement Studies 5,513 11,000 7.60% 1999 SW223 Wastewater Master Plan 5,637 65,940 100.00% 2001 SW232 Poggi Canyon Ext-Eastlake Pkwy 24,500 1,225,261 100.00% 2004 SW233 Moss Street Woodlawn to Broadway 13,071 2B4,99B 25.70% 2007 SW234 Sower Improvement Colorado J & K 564 1BB,BB3 100.00% 2004 -' SW235 Main S1. Sewer Hilltop - Fresno 1,297 B6,459 100.00% 2004 C) SW258 Sewer Capaoity Analysis 1,429 49,099 100.00% 2007 I '" 'W TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 52,011 ~ o I N +> LOANS: II " II TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FY08/09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Descnotion of Loan Outstanding Loan Amount Loan to Oxford 51. AD97-1 Improvement Fund, approved by Council Resolution #18795 on October 28, 1997 7,680 Loan to Twin Oaks Ave AD96-1, approved by Council Resolution #18873 on January 20, 1998 Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #18996 on May 19,1998 536,508 Loan to Slorm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #19078 on July 16, 1999 for project DR140 (Storm Drain Repair-Orange) 56,818 Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #19607 on Nov. 24, 1999 for project DR 147 (CMP Storm Drain Replacement) 220,413 Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #19682 on Jan. 19,2000 78,566 Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved by Council Resolution #2001-203 on June 19,2001 10,124,164 Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved by Council Resolution #2002-222 on June 18,2002 1,825,166 ATTACHMENT C.2 Interest Rale 7.00% 7.00% 6.07% 5.90% 5.88% 5.88% 5.88% 5.34% ~ o I N 01 LOANS: ATTACHMENT C,3 TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FYOBJ09 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Descrigtion of Loan Outstanding Loan Amount Interest R~~ 2,834,018 1,90% 1,079,571 1.50% $ 16,762,904 Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved by Council Resolution #2002-297 on August 13, 2002 Advance to Sait Creek Sewer DIF approved by Council Resolution #2003-278 on June 17, 2003 Total