Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd 1988-2258 Revised 3/16/88 ORDINANCE NO. 2258 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REZONING THE PROPERTY AT 587 MOSS STREET FROM RU29 RESIDENTIAL TO S-86 PARKING WITH THE "D" DESIGN REVIEW DESIGNATION WHEREAS, the applicant, Sundancer Lounge, Inc., has purchased the property at 1011 Broadway and at 587 Moss Street for the purpose of reopening a cocktail lounge which had been in operation for a number of years, but has been vacant since March of 1986, and WHEREAS, the cocktail lounge, located at 1011 Broadway is zoned C-36, a general commercial zone, while the property at 587 Moss Street, which is contiguous to the rear of the cocktail lounge property, is zoned RU-29, a multi-family residential zone, and WHEREAS, the lot at 587 Moss Street is paved to provide parking for the cocktail lounge, and contains a dwelling unit that had been converted to storage and the applicant is requesting rezoning of the property at 587 Moss Street in order to provide adequate parking for the cocktail lounge under current zoning standards, and WHEREAS, an Initial Study, IS-88-42M of possible adverse environmental impacts of the project was conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator on February 5, 1988, who concluded that there would be no significant environmental effects and recommended that the Negative Declaration be adopted, and WHEREAS, the Montgomery Planning Committee, at their meeting of February 17, 1988, voted 5-0 with two members absent to recommend approval of the fezone application with the design review special area regulation designator outlined in the staff recommendation, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at their meeting of February 24, 1988, voted 6-0 with one member abstaining to recommend approval of the fezone application with the "D" design review designation. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION I: The City Council has reviewed the Initial Study and any comments thereon and hereby adopts Negative Declaration IS-88-42M attached hereto as Exhibit A. -1- SECTION II: That that certain property located at 587 Moss Street be rezoned from RU-29, residential to S-86 parking, adding the Design Review special area regulation designator regulating parking, landscaping, vehicular circulation, fencing, and street improvements, in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution PCZ-88-H(M), adopted on the 24th day of February, 1988. SECTION III: During staff review of the site plan, landscaping and lighting are to be reviewed by the Police Department to ensure adequate visibility from the street for law enforcement purposes. SECTION IV: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirty-first day from and after its passage and approval. Presented by Approved as to form by Planning City Attorney 3949a FIRST READ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C' OF CHULA VISTA· CALIFORNIA· HELD March i5 . 19 ~8 ~ AND FINALLY PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD March 22 · 19 88 · BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE· TO-WIT: AYES: Councilmen Malcolm, Moore, McCandliss, Nader NAYES: Councilmen None ABSTAIN: Councilmen None ABSENT: Councilmen cox SIM, E OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of OI~DINANCE NO. 2258 ,and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED ~ City Clerk CrlY OF CHULA VISTA CC-660 ,negative declaration \ PROJECT NAME: Sundancer LounEe Parking PROJECT LOCATION: 587 Moss Street PROJECT APPLICANT: Sundancer Lounge, Inc. CASE NO: IS 88-42M -DATE: February 5, 1988 A. Project SetrinK The proposed fezone area is a paved, level, rectangular lot df 8,300 square feet which contains one dwellin~ surrounded by a six foot wood fence. A duplex is located on the east side of the lot, approximately six feet from. the property line. A car sales and repair facility is located~ west of the property and is separated from the fezone area by a six foot chain link fence. The lot is ad3acent to the cocktail lounge located at loll Broadway along the rear portion of the wastam property boundary. B. Project Description The applicant; Sundancer LounEe, Inc., has purchased the property at 1011 Broadway and at 587 Moss Street for the purpose of reopeninE a cocktail lounge which had been in operation for a number of years, but has been v~Lcant since March of 1986. The cocktail lounge, located at 1011 Broadway is zoned C-36, a general commercial zone. While the property at 587 Moss Street, which is contiguous to the rear of the cocktail lounge property, is zoned RU-29, a multi-family residential zone. The lot at 587 Moss Street is paved to provide parking for the cocktail lounge, and contains a dwelling unit that had been converted to storage. The applicant is requesting rezonlng of the property at 587 Moss Street in order to provide adequate parkin~ for the cocktail lounge under current zoning standards. Street improvements to be required as a standard development requirement, either through building permits or site plan review, would include but not be limited to dedication of 2 feet of right-of-way for frontage alone Moss Street, paving, curb, gutter, and sidewalk. C. Compatibility with ZoninR and Plans The fezone request to an S-86 parkins zone conforms to the HiSh Density Residential Land Use desiSnation shown in the Montgomery Specific Plan. D.Identification of Environmental Effects 1. DralnaSe The proposed project site lies within the boundaries of the 500 year floodplain of the Telegraph Canyon Creek. However, since the parcel at 587 Moss Street does not lie within the 100 year floodplain and the proposed parkins use involves no bulldinEs, there is no potent~(~,~  for creation of adverse environmental effects of a siSnificant nat~ City of chula vista planning department CI]YOF environmental review section. CHULA VISTA ¢ E. Findings of Insignificant Impact 1. The proposed parking lot would contain no buildings within the 500 year floodplain and, therefore, will not degrade the quality of the environment. 2. The proposed continuation of parking uses under current zoning and design standards will buffer commercial uses from adjacent residential uses and, therefore, will serve to further long term environmental goals. 3. The parking lot project contains no adverse environmental effects that are cumulative in nature. 4. The parking lot would be separated from adjacent residential uses by a 6 foot wall and will, therefore, not result in substantial adverse effects on human beings. G. Consultation 1. Individuals and Organizations City of Chula Vista: Julia Schilling, Assistant Planner Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer William Wheeler, Building and Housing Department Carol Gore, Fire Marshal Mike Donnelly, Associate Traffic Engineer 2. Documents 1) Montgomery Specific Plan, 1988 2) Chapter 19.70 of Title 19 (Zoning) of the Chula Vista Municipal Code 3) Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Boundary and Floodway Map, August 15, 1983 The Initial Study application and evaluation forms documenting the findings of no significant impact are on file and available for public review at the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010. ~IRON~TAL~ORDI NATOR WPC 4800P/0175P [N 6 !Ray. 5/85) L city of chula vista planning department ~ environmental review section CHUb~ ~ FUR UFFICE USE ~ . ~I' ' Case No. /S- ~ ~'A[2. Date Rec'd 1-/~- S?~ City of Chu]a Vista Accepted by ~'2~ Application Form Project No. f~- ~y~ 2. PR~ECT LOCATION (Street address o~ descHption) p~nN oF PPFMTqFq CO~NLY KNOWN AS 1011 BROADWAY, CHU~ VISTA, CA 92011 Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. f~/~--/~ ~ O~ 3. BRIEF PR~ECT DESCRIPTION REZONING OF A 50' X 166' LOT, PORTION DE PREMISES AT 1011 BROWWAY, CHU~ VISTA, CA 92011 FROM RESIDENTIAL TO CO~ERCIAL C-36 TO LEGALLY ALLOW ~IE USE T~T t~5 BEEN ~DE OF THE PROPERTY FOR THE ~ST 12 YEARS, T~T' OF CO~RCIAL PARKING~D CO~ERCIAL 5TO~GE. 4. Name of Applicant SUND~CER LOUNGE. INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPO~TION ~D ~SA. MORNING, ~ INDIVIDUAL Phone 420-7500 ~T OFFICE BOX 1G77 City BONITA State CA Zip 92002 5. Name of P~epa~e~/Agent THOMAS A. HORNING Address POST OFFICE BOX 1677 Phone 420-7500 City ~NITA State CA Z~p 92002 Relation to Applicant APPLIC~T 6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures o~ documents ~equired by the Environmental Review Coordinator. a. Permits o~ approvals required: General Plan Revision Design Review Committee Public P~oject XX Rezoning/P~ezoning 'Tentative Subd. Map __Annexation Precise Plan Grading Permit Design Review Board Specific Plan 'Tentative Parcel Map Redevelopment Agency Cond. Use Permit ' Site Plan & A~ch. Review Variance 0the~ b. Enclosures o~ documents (as ~equ~red by the Environmental Review Coordinator). Location Map A~ch. Elevations Eng. Geology Report G~ad~ng Plan __Landscape Plans Hyd~ological Study xx Site Plan Photos of Site & Biological Study Parcel Map Setting A~chaeological Survey P~ecise Plan Tentative Subd. Map 'No~se Assessment Specific Plan ' Improvement Plans __T~affic Impact Report Othe~ Agency Permit or Soils Report __Othe~ Approvals Requi~ed EN 3 (Rev. 12/82) B. PROPOSED PROjECT .~:~ 1. Land Area: sq. footage 8,300 or acreage If land area to be dedicated, state acreage and purpose. 2. Complete this section if project is residential. a. Type development: Single family Two family Multi family Townhouse Condominium b. Number of structures and heights c. Number of Units: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms 3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms Total units d. Gross density (DU/total acres) e. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication) f. Estimated project population g. Estimated sale or rental price range h. Square footage of floor area(s) i. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures j. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided k. Percent of site in road and paved surface 3. Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial. a. Type(s) of land use AUTO~)BILE PARKING AND COPtMERCIAL STORAGE IN b. F1 oor area N/A CONJUNCTI~T~ ~SST~r~~ BAR OPE~TION C. Type of construction used in the structure EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE DE~LISHED WITH NO NEW C~STRUCTION P~NED FOR PORTI~I OF PREMISES EFFECTED BY TIIIS APPLI~TION d. Describe major access points to the structures and the orientation to adjoining properties and streets SEE SITE P~, DRIPWAY ACCESS FROM ~SS STREET ~D FROM PORTION OF PREMISES FRONTING ON BROADWAY e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided 18 f. Estimated number of employees per shift N/A , Number of shifts N/A Total fi/A g. Estimated nu~er of customers (per day) and basis of estimate - 3 - h. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate N/A i. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings AUTOMOBILE PARKING Hours of operation 11:00 AM TO 2:00 AM, SEVEN DAYS k. Type of exterior lighting SEE ATTACHED SITE PLAN 4. If project is other than residential, commercial or industrial complete this section. a. Type of project b. Type of facilities provided c. Square feet of enclosed structures d. Height of structure(s) - maximum e. Ultimate occupancy load of project f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS 1. If the project could result in the direct emission of any air pollutants, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) identify them. N/A 2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated NO (If yes, complete the following:) a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards of earth will be excavated? b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed? c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded? d. What will be the - Maximum depth of cut Average depth of cut Maximum depth of fill Average depth of fill - 4 - 3. Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of energy used lair conditioning, electrical appliance, heating equipment, etc.) PARKING LOT LIC~TS~ E~ECTRICA~ 4. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project (sq. ft. or acres) NONE 5. If the project will result in any employment opportunities describe the nature and type of these jobs. N/A 6. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or substances be used or stored within the project site? hK3 7. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by the project? N/A 8. Describe {i f any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project, and their points of access or connection to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the following: new streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer _ lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. NQNF D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1. Gegl~gy Has a geology study been conducted on the property? NO (If yes, please attach) Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? NO (If yes, please attach) 2. Hydrology Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site? NO (If yes, please explain in detail.) a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water table? NO b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site? YES MOSS AND BROADWAY STREET DRAINAGE SYSTEM - 5 - c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly into or toward a domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay? STRFFT DRATNA&F SYSTFM TO SAN DIEGO BAY d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas? NO e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location. NQNF fiTHFR T~a~ THE GRADE OF ll~E ~D 3. Noise a. Will there be any noise generated from the proposed project site or from points of access which may impact the surrounding or adjacent land uses? Nn 4. Biolog~ a. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state? b. Indicate type, size and quantity of trees on the site and which (if any) will be removed by the project. NONE 5. Past Use of the Land a. Are there any known historical resources located on or near the project site? NO b. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site? NO 6. Current Land Use a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the project site. STRUCTURE USED FOR COb~ERCIAL STORAGE, ORIGI~LLY CONSTRUCTED TO PROVIDE RESIDENTIAL HOUSING, AUTO/v~)BILE PARKING ~D DRI~FWAY ACCESS TO LOT AND OTHER PORTIONS OF ll~E PREMISES AT 1011 BROADWAY, CHULA VISTA, CA 92011 L - 6 - b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent property. North FACING O~] MOSS STREET! ACROSS STREET COMMERCIAL STRIP CENTER OCCUPANCY South MULTI-FAMILY RESIDE~]TIAL PARKING AND DRIVEWAY ACCESS, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE East RESIDENTIAL West COMMERCIAL, AUTOMOBILE SALES, COCKTAIL LOUNGE WITH FOOD SERVICE AND DANCING, BOTH OCCUPANICES FACING ON BROADWAY 7. Social a. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?) NO b. Are there any current employment opportunities on site? (If so, how many and what type?) NO Please provide any other information which could expedite the evaluation of the proposed project. PROPOSED USE AND IMPROVEMENTS WOULD BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THE USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THE LAST 12 YEARS. PROPOSED CHANGES CONSIST OF DEMOLISHING THE COMMERCIAL STORAGE STRUCTURE NOW COVERING PART OF '~tE LANDsAND REPLACING THE STRUCTURE WITH PAVING FOR AUTOMOBILE PARKIMG. - 7 - E. CERTIFICATION I, THOMAS A. HORNING, AN INDIVIDUAL ~qD AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SUNDANCER LOUNGE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. Consultant or Agent* HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and information herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known information concerning the project and its setting have been included in Parts B, C and D of this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for attachments thereto. DATE: JANUARY 11, 1988 *If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name. -8~ case No./ CITY DATA F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Current Zoning on site: ~ CJ-~0 North ('-T-P/9 U~2 @ East West C Does the project conform to the current zoning? ma - ~. ~eneral Pla~ lan~ ~e designation on site: /-/i~ ~ S~ North , - South -~ Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram? I~ the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an area so designated? Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? ec~r (If yes, describe the design techniques being used to prot enhance the scenic quality of Chula Vista.) How many acres of developed parkland are within the Park Service District of this project as shown in the Parks and Recreation Element of the General P1 an? What is the current park ~c~}~ge requirements in the Park Service District? How many acres of parkland are necessary to serve the proposed project? (2AC/IO00 pop.) X.)~ Does the project site provide access to or have the potential to/~r~vide access to any mineral resource? (If so, describe in detail.) - 9 - 3. Schools If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: Current Current Students Generated School Attendance Capacity From Project Elementary Jr. High /L}/ Sr. High 4. Aesthetics Does the project contain features which could be construed to be at a variance from nearby features due to bulk, form, texture or color? (If so, please describe.) ~¢6~ec~ 5. Energy Consumption Provide the estimated consumption by the proposed project of the following SOUrceS: Electricity (per year) Natural Gas (per year) Water (per day) nl Case No. G. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1. Drainage a. Is the project site within a flood plain? KS b. Will the project be subject to any existing flooding hazards? c. Will the project create any flooding hazards? d. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities? ~3F~'~,l/T ~'~~ e. Are they adequate to serve the project? xK~ S f. What is the location and description of existing off-site drainage facilities? /F/ <,~ ~ ~ ~ ~L ~ S ~ .~ g. Are they adequate to serve the project? 2. Transportation a. What roads provide primary access to the project? c. ~ha~ ~s ~he A~T and es~9::d ~evel of sew~ce before and af~e~ Before After L.O.S. d. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project?__ If not, explain briefly. > / ] e. Will it be necessary that additional dedication, widening and/or improvement be made to existing streets? If so, specify the general nature of the necessary actions. ' ~ ll Case No. 3. Geology a. Is the project site subject to: or Known suspected fault hazards? / ~, Liquefaction? Landslide or slippage? project? 4. Soils a. Are there any anticipated/~)l~erse soil conditions on the project site? b. If yes, what are these adverse soil conditions? c. Is a soils report necessary? 5. Land Form a. What is the average natural slope of the site? ~ F/~f) d/~~ b. What is the maximum natural slope of the site? 6. Noise Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required of the applicant? - 12 - Case No. 7. Air Quality If there is any direct or indirect automobile usage associated with this project, complete the following: Total Vehicle Trips Emission Grams of (per day) Factor Pollution CO X 118.3 = Hydrocarbons X 18.3 = HOx (NO2) X 20.0 Particulates X 1.5 : Sulfur X .78 : 8. Waste Generation How much solid and liquid (sewage) waste will be generated by the proposed project per day? Solid /L}/'/9~- Liquid. /t///(J What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or adjacent to the site? ~)//~ Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? 9. Public Facilities/Resources Impact If the project could exceed the threshold of having any possible significant impact on the environment, please identify the public facilities/resources and/or hazards and describe the adverse impact. IInclude any potential to attain and/or exceed the capacity of any public street, sewer, culvert, etc. serving the project area.) Remarks/necessary mitigation measures -13 - Case No. H. FIRE DEPARTMENT . 1. What is the distance to the nearest fire ra~}2,d what is the Fire Departmen tl on timer , 2. Will the Fire Department be able to provide an adequate level o'f fire ,, protection for the roposed facility without an increase .in equipment. or. personnel ? ~ ' .... ..: '::', ¢ EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS CASE NO. AS rl I. Analysis (Provide in Section J an explanation of mitigation proposed for all significant or potentially significant impacts.) YES POTENTIAL 1. Geology a. Is the project site subject to any substantial hazards, such as earthquakes, landsliding, or liquefaction? b. Could the project result in: Significant unstable earth conditions or changes in geological substructure? A significant modification of any unique geological features? __ Exposure of people or property to significant geologic hazards? - 2.' Soils a. Does the project site contain any soils which are expansive, alluvial or highly erodible? ~ b. Could the project result in: A significant increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off-site? ~ .. A significant amount of siltation? 3. Ground Water a. Is the project site over or near any accessible ground water resources? ¢ YES POTENTIAL b. Could the project result in: A significant change in quantity or quality of ground water? A significant alteration of direction or rate of flow of ground water? Any other significant affect on ground water? 4. Drainage a. Is the project site subject to inundation? b. Could the project result in: A significant change in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate of amount of surface runoff? Any increase in runoff beyond the capacity of any natural water-way or man-made facility either on-site or downstream? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in amount of surface water in any water body? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as, flooding or tidal waves? 5. Resources Could the project result in: Limiting access to any significant mineral resources which can be economically extracted? The significant reduction of currently or potentially productive agricultural lands? 6. Land Form Could the project result in a substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES POTENTIAL 7. Air Quality a. Is the project subject to an air quality impact from a nearby stationary or mobile source? b. Could the project result in: A significant emission of odors, fumes, or smoke? F~issions which could degrade the ambient .r quality? Exacerbation or a violation of any National or State ambient air quality standard? Interference with the maintenance of standard air quality? The substantial alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any significant change in climate either locally or regionally? A violation of the revised regional air quality strategies (RAQS)? 8. Water Quality Could the project result in a detrimental effect on bay water quality, lake water quality or public water supplies? 9. Noise a. Is the project site subject to any unacceptable noise impacts from nearby mobile or stationary sources? __ b. Could the project directly or indirectly result in a significant increase in ambient noise levels? YES POTENTIAL lO. Biology a. Could the project directly or indirectly affect a rare, endangered or endemic species of animal, plant or other wildlife; the habitat of such species; or cause interference with the movement of any resident or migratory wildlife? b. Will the project introduce domestic or other animals into an area which could affect a rare, endangered or endemi~ cies?. ll. Cultural Resources a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric, historic, archaeological or paleontological resource? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historical building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic or cultural values? d. .Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 12. Land Use a. Is the project clearly inconsistent with the following elements of the General Plan? La.d use Circulation " Scenic Highways Conservation Housing Noise Park and Recreation Open Space Safety Seismic Safety .. Public Facilities YES POTENTIAL b. Is the project inconsistent with the Comprehensive Regional Plan? 13. Aesthetics a. Could the project result in: Degradation of community aesthetics by imposing structures, colors, forms or lights widely at variance with prevailing community standards Obstruction of any scenic view or vista open to the public? Will the proposal result in a new light source or glare? ,, 14. Social a. Could the project result in: The displacement of residents or people employed at the site? A significant change in density or growth rate in the area? The substantial demand for additional housing or affect existing housing? . 15. Community Infrastructure a. Could the project inhibit the ability of the urban support system to provide adequate support for the community or this project? b. Could the project result in a deterioration of any of the following services? Fire Protection Police Protection Schools Parks or Recreational Facilities Maintenance of Public Facilities Including Roads .,( YES POTENTIAL 16. Energy Could the project result in: Wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy? A significant increase in demand on existing sources of energy? A failure to conserve energy, water or other resources? 17. Utilities Could the project result in a need for new systems or alternatives to the following utilities: Power or natural gas Communications systems . Water Sewer or septic tanks Solid waste & disposal 18. Human Health Could the project result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? 19. Transportation/Access Could the project result in: A significant change in existing traffic patterns? An increase in traffic that could substantially lower the service level of any street or highway below an acceptable level? 20. Natural Resources Could the project result in a substantial depletion of non-renewable natural resources? YES POTENTIAL NO 21. Risk of Upset Will proposals involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances lincluding, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? ~/ b. Possible interference with an emergency plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Z~/ 22. Growth Inducement Could the service requirements of the project result in secondary projects that would have a growth inducing influence and could have a cumulative effect of a significant level? ~/ 23. Mandatory Findings of Significance a. Does the project have a potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity of the environment?. b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? (A short term impact on the environment is one which occurs in the relatively brief, definitive period of time, while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connec- tion with the effects of past project, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) .... d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? = m PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES The following project revisions or mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project and will be implemented during the design, construction or operation of the project: Project Proponent Date K. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial study: i/x It is recommended that the decision making authority find that " the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby forwarded to the decision making authority for consideration and adoption. It is recommended that the decision making authority find that ' although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described above have been ADDED to the project and a MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLAR~" ~is hereby forwarded to the decision making authority for consideration and adoption. It is found that the proposed project MAY have a significant 'effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required to evaluate the issues identified in this Initial Study. It is found that further information will be necessary to ' determine any environmental significance resulting from the project and the technical information listed below is required prior to any determinati on. Environmen jew Coordinator Date WPC O169P CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT )COMMISSION AND ALL OTHER OFFICIAL BODIES. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the application. THOMAS A. HORNING DONALD W. RISINGER AND EDITH V. RISINGER SUNDANCER LOUNGE. INC. List the names of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. DONALD W. RISINGER AND EDITH V. RISINGER 2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. THOMAS A. HORNING OWNS 100% OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES OF SUNDANCER LOUNGE, INC, 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. NONE 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No xx If yes, please indicate person(s) Person is defined as: "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association, soc"6'~'f~T club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city, municipality, district or other political subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a/u/~it." (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)~~j~ /--/Signature'of appl'iC~n~e 1/11/88 / SUNDANCER LOUNGE, INC. WPC 0701P (' THOMAS A. HORNING A-110 Print or type name of applicant