HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009/06/23 Additional Information
G/.J3/Dq f'tAJok c.om~
--rbe~<>>:C\ ~~
What follows is part of the agenda packet from 10/24/06 when the mobile home park overlay zone
was adopted by the council. Jade Bay was one of the 32 Mobile Home Parks included in the overlay.
Tomorrow the Planning Commission is supposed to consider a rezone of this property from
MHP exclusive to R3P. This is a violation of the promise made to the residents of mobile homes in
2006.
The purpose of this overlay was to add another step "prior to a closure and/or a rezone." Staff has
eliminated the step of a relocation plan approved "by the city"
and a hearing by the City Council making findings. This is not acceptable and a violation of trust. A
promise is a promise and the council promised to add this additional safeguard back in 2006.
Staff is saying that the relocation plan approved by the bankruptcy judge meets this provision.
We disagree. The bankruptcy judge has nothing to do with the city. The entire bankruptcy was a
shady deal. It is in the city's best interest to require a relocation plan that takes into account the
necessity of paying a part of the rent of a number of people for 6 or 7 years until they can qualify for
Section 8. This is an expense the city has already borne for over 2 years. The. city also paid for a
bankruptcy attorney. If the city is ever to get some compensation for these expenses the time is now.
This matter must not go to the Planning Commission until the city has a relocation plan dealing with
the problems caused by the owner's actions, and the residents get a hearing where they can make
clear the adverse affects of this matter upon them. The city should not make the findings until such
time as some deal is worked out with the greedy, unscrupulous owner to reimburse the city at least in
part for its expenses, if not to take care of the residents until they qualify for section 8.
In Chula Vista. mobilehome developments have historically been a part of that supply. and have effectively
provided a unique and affordable housing source. Housing costs for
mobilehome living are often lower than market rates for other types of housing such as
comparable sized rental apartments. As such. it is not uncommon to find that many of the
households residing in mobilehome developments are living on fixed incomes. or are
otherwise in need of lower-income affordable housing. Additionally. many residents own
their own coach. but rent or lease the land space. leaving them vulnerable to changes in land
use. These circumstances can present added challenges in finding suitable replacement
housing options for mobile home residents in the event of potential closure of one or niore of
these developments.
As shown on Figure 5-18(A). there are currently 32 mobilehome developments within the
City in a variety of settings ranging from well organized and maintained parks with exclusive
Mobile Home Park (MHP) zoning. to less formal and often smaller trailer parks in areas
zoned for commercial or other development. Within the Urban Core Subarea. several
mobilehome developments fall within the Interstate 5 Corridor District where higher density
housing and transit-focused mixed uses are envisioned to occur. With increasing housing
demands and rising land costs throughout the region. the likelihood for potential closure of
some mobilehome developments over time is real.
In recognition of these circumstances. and in order to better balance the often unique needs of
mobilehome residents with the challenges in locating suitable replacement housing. it is
important that analysis and planning be undertaken in accordance with the principles of the
Housing Element obiectives prior to the City's consideration of any requested change in use
and/or rezoning affecting anv of the existing mobilehome sites. In order to accomplish this.
the Mobilehome Overlav District is established to ensure that the appropriate evaluation .and
consideration of the affects of potential changes in use and/or urban redevelopment on this
unique form of housing from the standpoints of housing opportunity. affordabilitv. and
displacement. replacement and/or relocation assistance is conducted in accordance with the
principles et forth in the Housing Element and the Municipal Code.
,
As stated in the following Obiective and Policies. the Mobilehome Overlav District ensures
that the analvsis and planning on the affects of closure on existing mobilehome residents is
conducted and that the property owner and/or proiect proponent has prepared and carried out
a plan to address those affects as required bv the Municipal Code.
Obiective - LUT 34.A
Ensure sufficient evaluation and response to the effects of anv change of use or urban
redevelopment of existing mobilehome develbpments. . - .
Policies
LUT 34AI Prior to the Citv's consideration of anv proposed change of use and/or
rezoning.pursuan1.to Municipal C9de Chapter 9.40.of axlV mobilehome development
properties within the City'as identified on Figure 5-18(A). the propertv owner and/or proiect
proponent shall prepare a plan in conformance with applicable'State and City regulations '
including Municipal Code Chapter 9AO, and to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning
and Building and !h~ Director of Community Development. that provides steps and
provisions intended to resolve anv adverse impacts of the conversion on the affected
residents, ' ' .
LUT 34A2 At thEHime of consideration of anv change of use and/or rezoning ofanv'
of the mobilehome properties noted above. the Citv Council shall review the plan prepared
under Policv 34A I. and prior to takina action on said chanae of use and/or rezonina in
accordance with the reauirements of Municipal Code Chapter 19,06 and section 19.12.020. .
shall make the followina findinQs:
. That the proposed change of use and/or rezoning will not adverselv affect attainment
of the Citv's goal to provide a varietv of housing options within the Citv. (Housing
Element Obiective 3)
. That the proposed change of use and/or rezoning is supported bv sound planning
principles. and will further opportunities to provide higher densitv. affordable
replacement housing within the Citv, (Housing Element Obiective 3)
. That the propertv owner and/or proiect proponent plan does ensure sufficient
evaluation and response to the effects of the change of use and/or rezoning of the
existing mobilehome development. (Housing Element Obiective 4)
That the proposed change of use and/or rezoning will not result in severe or undue
hardship on affected mobilehome residents, (Housing Element Obiective 4)
. That the property owner and/or proiect proponent plan complies with applicable City
and State mobilehome conversion and relocation regulations. (Housing Element
Obiective 4)
, That prior to the commencement of any closure of the mobilehome development. that
the property owner( s) will prepare and ensure performance of a detailed closure and
relocation plan consistent with the requirements ofCVMC Section 9.40 and
applicable State regulations, and to the satisfaction of Directors of Planning and
Building and Community Development.
and/or rezoning affecting any of the existing mobilehome sites, In order to accomplish this.
the Mobilehome Overlay District is established to ensure that the appropriate evaluation and
consideration of the affects of potential changes in use and/or urban redevelopment on this
unique form of housing from the standpoints of housing opportunity. affordability, and
displacement. replacement and/or relocation assistance is conducted in accordance with the
principles et forth in the Housing Element and the Municipal Code.
As stated in the following Obiective and Policies. the Mobilehome Overlay District ensures
that the analysis and planning on the affects of closure on existing mobilehome residents is
conducted and that the property owner and/or proiect proponent has prepared and carried out
a plan to address those affects as required by the Municipal Code.
, - - .
~~-
'\ 0\\'\'c lp\"\>tWA'11
City ofChula Vista
Southwest Redevelopment Project Area
Fiscal Years 1991-2006
. . . .. . . _ ' ., ' ", ~.., ". .' . 10, ' '.' . ..,.. .~, . ..';....; .. - .., '" ,,,, . j", ."..." I" 1 ,. , JI '.... "'" '"
~r~ss Taxlncrement:\ 0 433,654 333,278. 329,541 359,058 581,312 499,476 510,635 577,229 581,835 1,223,533 1,293,769 1,567,445 1,876,209 2,157,676 2,911,943 l15,S,n,29g)
Lcwand~,10d~rateSetf,side 0 (85,73i) (66,655) (65,908) (73812) (115252) (99,89~) (102,127) (135,566) (17S,J5il (244.72i) (258,754) (333,429) (375,242) (431.535) (562,390) (3,129,450)
rJeJotia:ed Taxing Agreeement 0 . (178,253) (136,934) (135,458) (151701) (238948) (205310) (20S 897) (278,622) (362,478) (502,974) (531,804) (685,403) (771.216) (836,913) (1,155,852) (6.431,822)
(NetTax Increrr,entl 0 158,670 129,628 123,175 143,545 226,101 ',94,271 198,611 263,642 342.S-90 475,932 503,211 648,553 729,751 829,228 1,093,708 (.6086,017
Advances:
Ge"eralfund 286,101 88,701 96308 99,413 1i8,450 127,308 122,205 117,441 134,599 126,556 1,317,022
6ayfronVTown ~enter 1- 230,000 100,000 380,000
TrJnk Se.....er 825,000 825,000
Town Center II 300,000 300,000
O\ayValiey 199,225 49,500 2~8,725
Tota! Acvances 230,000 100,000 1,1'11,',01 287,925 145,803 99.413 4',S,450c 127,308 122205 , 17,441 134,599 125,555 3,070,607
0"
2000 T AS Sond Proceeds 1,796,428 1,795,428
In:erel Earned. bond Proceeds 4J,354 78250 60.127 16.844 10,466 25,531 231,582
Total,::tesources 280,000 258,570 129,~23 '28,175 143.5~5 1.337,2J2 4:2,197 344.419 353.055 .761,440 2,440,022 703676 325,'21 881,194 975,250 1,119.239 11,184,834
. ~ .
Repayment of Advances:
inJr.k Sewer (641,S38) (478,652) (7,284) (6) (1,127,890)
T::r.H, Center II (JOa,a00) (3JO,OOO)
OtajVafley ,,,. ~, (243,i2S) (248,725)
Sa,.1ronVTown Ctr I - (125000) (125,000)
Tc:al Re;Jayment of A:=vances (1,190,663) (125000) (478,652) (7,284) (6) (1,801,615)
..
Debt Service
Cypress Creek Notes Payabie (58701) (~.6,3?5) (9~.413) (118450) (127.3:)8) (122 205) (117.441) (133674) (90.997) (994,497)
200,) TASS ~ . (45,255) (t33.4~2) (136,250) (1368i'5) (155735) (166623) (785,211)
20G5 ERN loan . ~ . ~, (17.555) (17,565)
2006 EMF lean
To:al Debt Service (508,701) (96.308) (93.4'31 (118,450) (172,574) (255,55/) (253.701) (2705<9) (257732) (184,188) (1,79i.273)
Total Repayment & Debt Serv '" (96,308) P,598,888}
(88,701l-c - (99,41:;) (118,450} (1,353,237) (:\80,657) (732,363) (277,833) {257,738} (184,188)
Transfersln(Out) (4.107) (4,i07) (S,eS5) (5,895) (5,895) (5,855) (5.540) (4,509) (3,404) (~5,247)
~-----:-""\ .' (S89,S10) C(~:728~,19~~
~'YStaffServlce' (117,c57) (137,917) (120,950) (16u,E51) (201,672) (242,534) (3J3,761) (230.455) (i92,388) (39S.777) (541,4S6) (569,9E4) (578,499) (531,064) (512,629)
R0222'Pal0mar5: ShO~;lina C~n:er pO,a,:})) (i67,826) (i8,Oi.Q (21.014) (10,050) (235) (307,183)
Staff Time and elP (147,857) (305,744) (198,964) (181,555) (211,722) (242,584) (304,046) (230,466) (192,3.88) (396,777) (5-41,486) (569,984) (578,499) (531,064) (512,629) (889,510) (6,035,383)
TO:21 Remaining 132,143 (37,074) (59,3351 {53,490) (68,177) 1,094,618 89,451 17,546 71,254 :245,213 535,299 (:246.964) (4-84,742) 72,298 205,883 45,540 1,505,316
Pass Through Detail Capital and Redevelopment Projects
L::wand Moderate SetP,side 2::1.:100% Avaiia:.le Balance 1.505,315
County of San Diego .8.000% Palo:T,ar Street vVdening 243,591
Sweetwater Union High $ch.:>ol 7.180% General Plan Update 139,112
SOl.th.....estern Communi!)' Coilege 1.932% Net P'Jrchase Price Fulier Ford 1,011,000
SO County Office of Ej'Jcation 1.013% Main Street VVideninq 500,000
Chula Vis.ta Eiementary Sc'1::>o1 10.830% Total Proje~ Costs U9S,B03
Total Pass Throuqhs 59.105% Ir.terest Paid on Advances 45,910
Outstanding Ad-lances 1.667.082
Remaining Amount (2,',06,479)