Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009/07/14 Item 10CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT w~~ c1TV of ~` CHUTAVISTA 7/14/09, Item ~~ ITEM TITLE SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: SUMMARY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE "PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM FY 07/08 CHIP SEAL WITH MODIFIED POLYMER ASPHALT SURFACE SEALER (PASS) (STL335D/STL346)" PROJECT TO COPP CONTRACTING, INCORPORATED IN THE AMOUNT OF $916,956.43 AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF ALL AVAILABLE FUNDS IN THE PROJE DIRECTOR OF PUB C WORKS CITY MANAGE ASSISTANT CIT NAGER ~~ 4/STHS VOTE: YES ^ NO On June 24, 2009, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the "Pavement Rehabilitation Program FY07/08 Chip Seal with Modified Polymer Asphalt Surface Sealer (PASS) (STL335D/STL346)" project. This project consists of the application of chip seal with PASS to various streets in the City, in which removal and replacement of failed asphalt concrete pavement (dig-outs) was performed by another contractor (Frank & Sons, Inc.), under a separate contract. The proposed action would award the contract to Copp Contracting, Incorporated, and authorize the Director of Public Works to expend all available funds to maximize the number of streets in which this type of pavement maintenance work would be performed. The additional streets to receive the chip seal with PASS surface treatment would be selected from a list of streets completed by Frank & Sons, Inc. at the time chip seal work commences. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 1(c) categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Council adopt the resolution. 10-1 7/14/09, Item Page 2 of 3 BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION Included in the FY07/08 CIP Budget is a project to rehabilitate and preserve deteriorating pavement throughout the city. The Public Works Department, through the Pavement Management System, developed a priority list of streets to be included in the program. The goal of the program is to extend the serviceability of the streets through the removal and replacement of deteriorated sections of streets (dig-out) and the application of various types of surface treatments, including asphalt concrete overlays, chip seals, and REAS sealcoats. This surface treatment application of chip seal with PASS is the continuation of the dig-out project (STL335A) currently being conducted by another contractor, Frank & Sons, Inc. of Chula Vista. The remaining rehabilitation strategy, asphalt concrete overlay, will follow under separate contract and will complete the FY07/08 Pavement Rehabilitation Program. This project will also include the application of herbicide (weed removal), striping and pavement markings, traffic control, and other miscellaneous work, and all labor, material, equipment, and transportation necessary to successfully complete the project. Attachment 1 shows a primary list of streets to receive the chip seal surface treatment under the base bid. On June 24, 2009, the Director of Public Works received four (4) bids for the "Pavement Rehabilitation Program FY07/08 Chip Seal with Modified Polymer Asphalt Surface Sealer (PASS) (STL335D)" project." The following bids were received: CONTRACTOR B[D AMOUNT 1. Copp Contracting, Inc. -Buena Park, CA $916,956.43 2. International Resurfacing Systems -Modesto, CA $1,093,886.00 3. Graham Contractors, Inc.- San Jose, CA $1,381,158.00 4. Intermountain Slurry Seal, Inc.- Sacramento, CA $1,478,072.00 The low bid submitted by Copp Contracting, Incorporated of Buena Park, CA is below the Engineer's estimate of $1,045,230.00 by $128,273.57 (12.27% below the Engineer's estimate); much of this difference can be attributed to the high degree of competition currently within the construction market. Design staff has verified the references provided by the contractor and has determined that the contractor has performed satisfactorily for those references. The Contractor's License No. 384209A is current and active. If approved, the proposed resolution would also (1) authorize that additional streets selected from a list of streets in which dig-outs have been completed by Frank & Sons, Inc. receive the chip seal with PASS surface treatment, and (2) increase the Director of Public Works' cumulative change order authority specified in City Council Policy No. 574-01 and authorize the Director of Public Works to expend all available funds in the project without further City Council action in order to complete as many streets as possible. Disclosure Statement Attachment 2 is a copy of the Contractor's Disclosure Statement. 10-2 7/14/09, Item ~ O Page 3 of 3 Wage Statement The source of funding for this project is TransNet. Contractors bidding this project are not required to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them for the work under this project. Disadvantaged businesses were encouraged to bid through the sending of the Notice to Contractors to various trade publications. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that the decision concerns repairs, replacement, or maintenance of existing streets or similar Facilities and, therefore, there is not a material financial effect of the decision on the property holdings of the City Council Members pursuant to California Code of Regulations sections 18704.2(b)(2) and 18705.2(b)(1). FISCAL IMPACT Previously approved in the FY 2008-09 CIP Program was STL346, Pavement Minor Rehabilitation funded by TransNet and Prop 42 funds. This project will utilize the existing STL346 funds for expenditure as proposed in this item. Staff time and expenditures captured in STL335D will be recovered from STL346. Thus, there is no impact to the General Fund as there are sufficient TransNet and Prop 42 funds in STL346 as necessary to complete this project. A breakdown of the project costs are as follows: FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Contract Amount $ 916,956 B. Contingencies (25%) $ 229,039 C. Staff Time & Testing Costs L Construction Inspection (5%) $ 57,310 2. Design/Construction Management (5%) $ 57,310 3. Environmental/Traffic/Public Works (2%) $ 22,924 4. Soil & Material Testing (1%) $ 11,461 TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $1,295,000 Sufficient funds are available in the STL346 project account to complete construction. ON-GOING FISCAL IMPACT: Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require only routine City street maintenance. ATTACHMENTS 1. List of Streets Included in Project (Base Bid) 2. Contractor's Disclosure Statement Prepared by: Roberto Juan, Associate Engineer, Public Works Department M:\Engineer\AGENDA\CAS2009\07-14-09\STL335D Al l3 Pavement Rehab (Chip Seal) - final.doc 10-3 ATTACHMENT l PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM FY07/08 (STL335) # STREET LOCATION BEGIN END LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) C-DS (SF) AREA (SF) CHIP SEAL PAVEMENT REHAB STL335D PHASE 1 -LEFT OVER FR OM STL340D. MUST B E COMPLETED FIRST PHASE 2 -NORTH OF L S TREET WEST OF I$05 38 BAY BL EST F ST 1,377.00 34.00 46,818.00 39 BAV BL J ST LST 2,780.00 42.00 716,760.00 40 BAV BL LST 1-5 FREEWAY RAMP 714.00 54.00 38,558.00 41 F-&F SE69NBAV H&1_~e^^~^.°. 2,635.00 37.00 0.00 42 THIRD AV DST EST 1,325.00 62.00 82,150.00 43 THIRD AV J ST LST 2,643.00 61 00 161,223.00 445 507.00 PHASE 3 -SOUTH OF L STREET, WEST OF 1.805 50 FIFTH AV ARIZONA ST PETEO CT 301.00 37.00 71,137.00 51 FIFTH AV NAPLES ST DUEEN ANNE DR 825.00 55.00 45,375.00 52 FIFTH AV OXFORD ST SHY LN 330.00 50.00 16,500.00 72 FOURTH AV KITTIWAKE LN MOSS ST 493.00 72.00 35,496.00 73 LST BAY BLVD BROADWAY 2,563.00 55.00 740,985.00 74 LST FIRST AV HILLTOP DR 1,342.00 61.00 81,862.00 75 E L ST HILLTOP DR HELIX AV 2,123.00 62.00 731,fi26.00 76 6XFBR9-ST 9XFBR8-Sx 0.00 77 TELEGRAPH CYN RD LST I -805 FREEWAY RAMP 317.00 62.00 19,282.00 78 TELEGRAPH CYN RD MELROSE AV LST 1,790.00 6500 77,350.00 79 THIRD AV NAPLES ST PALOMAR ST 2,847.00 61.00 161,467.00 721 060.00 PHASE 4 -SOUTH Of TEL EGRAPH CANYON ROA D, EAST OF I-805 97 MAIN ST NIRVANA AV HERITAGE RD 3,747.00 74.00 277,278.00 98 MAINSF 1,820.00 36.00 0.00 99 OLYMPIC PW BRANDYWINE AV HERITAGE RD 8,860.00 82.00 72fi,520.00 100 OLYMPIC PW LA MEDIA RD E PALOMAR ST 2,658.00 62.00 217,956.00 100 OLYMPIC PW E PALOMAR ST SANTA ELISABETH AV 2,253.00 62.00 184,746.00 OLYMPIC PW SANTA ELISABETH AV TOWN CENTER DR 2,320.00 98.00 227,360.00 OLYMPIC PW HUNTE PKWY WUESTE RD (S!S) 4,525.00 60.00 271,500.00 1,905 360.00 PHASE 5 -NORTH OF TEL EGRAPH CANYON ROA D EAST OF 1-805 27 HERITAGE RD (S/O CRICKEn EAST CITY LIMITS SOUTH CITY LIMITS 2,000.00 25.00 50,000.00 28 CORRAL CANNON RD COLTRIDGE LN PORT RENWICK 2,073.00 62.00 128,526.00 29 FENTON ST HALE PL LANE AV 590.00 62.00 36,580.00 30 FENTON ST LANE AV HAROLD PL 1,236.00 62.00 76,632.00 31 E PALOMAR ST LA MEDIA RD VISTA SONRISA AV 1,709.00 62.00 105,958.00 32 E PALOMAR ST MONARCHE DR SANTA ALICIA AV 935.00 52.00 48,620.00 446 3'16.00 ':TOTAL 3,578;243:00 M:\General Services\DesignWll Projects\STL\STL3351STL335 Surface Treatment LisLxls 10-4 ATTACHMENT 2 CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters that will require discretionary action by the Council, Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions £or a City of Chula Vista election must be filed. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. NONE 2. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals with a $2000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) entity. NONE 3. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is anon-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. NONE 4. Please identify every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. DENNIS COPP-PRESIDENT EZEKIEL A. COPP -VICE-PRESIDENT 5. Has any person* associated with this contract had any fmancial dealings with an official** of the City of Chula Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months? Yes No X 14 M:~Grnerzl Services~DcsignWll Projects~STUSTL335D PASS Chip Se~~Y['~SD PASS Chip Seal Pavemrnt Rehab Spas and Contractdoc If Yes, briefly describe the nature of the fmancial interest the official** may have in this contract. 6. ** Have you made a contribution of more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council? No ,~ yes _ If yes, which Council member? Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official** of the City of Chula Vista in the past twelve (12) months? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc.) yes _ No X If Yes, which official** and what was the nature of item provided? N/A Date: JUNE 24, 2009 ~rgnatrr~ of Contractor/App cant COPP CONTRACTING, INC. EZEKZEL A. COPP -VICE-PRESIDENT Print or type name of Contractor/App]icant Person is defined as: any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, district, or other political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit. Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, Council member, Planning Commissioner, Member of a boazd, commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staff members. IS M:\Grnenl Services\DesignWl Projects\STUSTL335D Pp55 Chip SeaI~STI335D PgSS Chip Seal Pavcment Rehab Specs and Contractdoc 10-6 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE "PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM FY 07/08 CHIP SEAL WITH MODIFIED POLYMER ASPHALT SURFACE SEALER (PASS) (STL335D/STL346)" PROJECT TO COPP CONTRACTING, INCORPORATED IN THE AMOUNT OF $916,956.43 AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF ALL AVAILABLE FUNDS IN THE PROJECT WHEREAS, City staff prepared specifications for the "Pavement Rehabilitation Program FY07/08 Chip Seal with Modified Polymer Asphalt Surface Sealer (PASS) (STL335D/STL346)" and advertised the project on June 5, 2009; and WHEREAS, on June 24, 2009, the Director of Public Works received four (4) sealed bids for the project as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT 1. Copp Contracting, Inc. -Buena Park, CA $916,956.43 2. International Resurfacing Systems -Modesto, CA $1,093,886.00 3. Graham Contractors, Inc.- San Jose, CA $1,381,158.00 4. Intermountain Slurry Seal, Inc.- Sacramento, CA $1,478,072.00 WHEREAS, the low bid by Copp Contracting, Inc. of Buena Park, CA is below the Engineer's estimate of $1,045,230.00 by $128,273.57 or 12.27%; and WHEREAS, staff has verified the references provided by the contractor with satisfactory results. The contractor has performed various work for other Cities and Counties and their work has been satisfactory; and WHEREAS, beginning FY09/10, STL346 will now be considered STL335D -Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal Highways; and WHEREAS, the City Council authorizes the Director of Public Works Operations authority to approve change orders as necessary up to the total funding available. 10-7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept bids and award contract for the "Pavement Rehabilitation Program FY07/08 Chip Seal with Modified Polymer Asphalt Surface Sealer (PASS) (STL335D/STL346)" project to Copp Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $916,956.43, and authorize the expenditure of all available funds in the project. Presented by Richard A. Hopkins Director of Public Works 10-8