Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd 1987-2207ORDINANCE NO. 1292 2207 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE AMENDED TOWN CENTRE II REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TOWN CENTRE II REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: NO FEE SECTION 1. On October 24, 1972 the Chula Vista City Council (herein "City Council") adopted Ordinance No. 1425 creating the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency (herein "Agency) for the purpose of pursuing redevelopmerit activities in the community. SECTION 2. The City Council has heretofore approved on August 15, 1978, Ordinance No. 1827 adopting the Town Centre No. II Redevelopment Plan and Project which contained no provisions for the allocation of tax increment pursuant to Section 33670 of the California Health and Safety Code. SECTION 3. The Redevelopment Plan's implementation has been constrained due in part to the inability of the Redevelopment Agency to ~rovide financial assistance required for on- and off-site improvements ecessary for the redevelopment of the Project Area, and the lack of financial .'esource available to the Agency to create the public/private relationship necessary for implementation. The Redevelopment Agency has recommended to the City Council and Planning Commission that the previously adopted Redevelopmerit Plan be amended to allow for the tax increment provisions of Section 33670 and other required amendments of the California Health and Safety Code, so as to enable the Agency to pursue redevelopment and revitalization of the Chula Vista Shopping Center and Sears Retail Centre with the present and prospective property owners. SECTION 4. The Agency, by Resolution No. 740 approved on October 16, 1986, and the Planning Commission (herein "Planning Commission"), by Resolution No. PCM-87-5 approved on October 8, 1987, have prepared and approved an amended Preliminary Redevelopment Plan for the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area (herein "Amended Preliminary Redevelopmerit Plan"). SECTION 5. The City Council has received from the Agency the proposed Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan for the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area (herein "Redevelopment Plan"), as approved by the Agency, a copy of which is on file at the Office of the Executive Director of the Agency at 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California, and at the office of the City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista (herein "City"), City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California, together with the Report of the 1 93 '~ency, entitled "Final Redevelopment Agency Report on the Amended Town Centre Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area" including the reasons for the original selection of the Project Area, a description of specific projects proposed by the Agency and how these projects will improve or alleviate the physical, social, and economic conditions existing in the Project Area, and an explanation of why the public improvement cannot be reasonably expected to be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone, a description of the original physical, social, and economic conditions existing in the Project Area, the proposed method of financing the redevelopment of the Project Area, a plan and method for the relocation of business owners and tenants who may be temporarily or permanently displaced from the Project Area, an analysis of the Amended Preliminary Redevelopment Plan, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission and report required by Government Code Section 65402, the summary of the Town Centre II Project Area Committee, a Final Environmental Impact Report on the Amended Redevelopment Plan, the report of the County Fiscal Officer and the Agency's analysis thereof, including a summary of the consultation of the Agency, or attempts to do so, with each of the taxing agencies, and a neighborhood impact report. Neither the County of San Diego nor any affected taxing agency called for the creation of a fiscal review committee, so there was no report thereof. SECTION 6. The Planning Commission which is the duly designated and official planning body for the City, has submitted to the City Council its report and recommendations for approval of the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan, and its certification that the Amended Redevelopment Plan ~onforms to the duly adopted General P1 an for the City (herein "General lan"), and the Project Area Committee has submitted to the City Council its .eport and recommendations for approval of the Amended Redevelopment Plan. SECTION 7. The Agency has previously found and determined by Ordinance No. 1827 that the Project Area was characterized by the conditions of blight. These conditions represented physical, social, and economic liabilities which required a redevelopment plan in order to properly provide for the revitalization, redevelopment, and development of these properties in a manner which was consistent with, and in the interest of, general welfare. In addition, the Amended Redevelopment Plan shall be a guideline for implementing the objectives set forth hereinafter so as to ensure that the policies, goals, and objectives of the Agency, the City Council, and the laws of the State of California are complied with and implemented in a manner which is most in keeping with the general welfare. The blight characterized in the Project Area constituted a physical, social, or economic liability in the community requiring redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the community, and further that this blight was causing a reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the area to such an extent that it constituted a serious physical, social, or economic burden on the community which could not reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. 1294 SECTION 8. The Town Centre II Redevelopmerit Project Area has, and ~ntinues to experience, severe physical, social, and economic problems which result in a blighted condition in the con~nunity. These conditions have an adverse economic and environmental impact on the surrounding community, and in turn, adversely affect the social environment of the surrounding residents, area businesses, and property owners. The deteriorated physical condition of the area; the trend toward business disinvestment; the lack of proper utilization of the parcels; inadequate circulation and infrastructure; crime rates and security needs; antiquated design of the physical character of structures; inadequate community facilities, open spaces and public facilities; shifts in retail uses and business marketing practices; and the minimal private reinvestment activities suggest that revitalization of the Project Area still cannot reasonably be expected to occur by private enterprise acting alone. SECTION 9. The City Council does determine and declare that the City Council's purpose and intent with respect to adopting the Amended Town Center II Redevelopment Plan is: a) The elimination of blighting influences, including incompatible land uses, obsolete structures, inadequate parking facilities, unsightly or unattractive signage and graphics, and inadequate landscape and townscape planning. b) The elimination of environmental, economic, social, platting, and physical deficiencies. c) The strengthening of the mercantile posture of Town Centre II, and the improvement of retail trade therein. d) The renewal of Town Centre II's physical plant and the improvement of its land use patterns and spatial relationships. e) The retention and expansion of viable land uses, commercial enterprises, and public facilities within the area. f) The attraction of capital and new business enterprises to the project area. g) The comprehensive beautification of the area, including its buildings, open space, streetscape, street furniture, graphics, signage. h) The establishment of design standards to assure desirable site design and environmental quality. i) The fostering of cooperation between the Town Centre II Project Area and the Chula Vista Town Centre Project Area (No. I), and the protection of the goals, objectives, and economic resurgence of the latter. 1295 The continuing promotion of Subarea 1 of the Chula Vista Town Centre {No. I) Project Area, as the principal center of specialty goods purveyance in the South Bay Subregion. SECTION lO. The Council has considered the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the Project Area Committee, the Amended Town Centre II Preliminary and the Final Redevelopment Agency Reports on the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan for the Town Center II Redevelopment Project Area, the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan and its economic feasibility, the feasibility of the relocation program, and the Final Environmental Impact Report, has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the Amended Redevelopmerit Plan. SECTION ll. The Agency and Council have reviewed and considered the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Amended Redevelopment Plan, prepared and submitted pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21151 and Health and Safety Code Section 33352, and certified the completion of said Environmental Impact Report on May 7, 1987, by Redevelopmerit Agency Resolution No. 816 and City Council Resolution No. 13022. SECTION 12. The proposed City Council and the Agency duly held a joint public hearing on May 7, 1987, on the adoption of the Amended Redevelopment Plan and matters related thereto. Notice of said hearing was duly and regularly published in the Star News, a newspaper of general circulation in the City and the County, there being no newspaper of general irculation printed and published in the City, once a week for four successive .,eeks prior to the date of said hearing, and a copy of said notice and affidavit of publication are on file with the City Clerk and the Agency. Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with receipt requested to the last known address of each assessee as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of San Diego of each parcel of land in the proposed Project Area. SECTION 13. The City Council acknowledges receipt of and files: a. Resolution No. 13023 of the City of Chula Vista electing to be allocated certain revenues attributable to increases in the assessed value of the taxable property in the redevelopment Project Area, which are, or otherwise would be, calculated annually pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section llO.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and has provided for such allocation in accordance with the Amended Redevelopment Plan. SECTION 14. All other written and oral objections to the Redevelopment Plan and Project Area are hereby overruled. 1296 SECTION 15. The Proposed Amended Redevelopment Plan after public .aring and as recommended by the Agency, the Planning Commission, and the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area Committee are hereby approved and adopted respectively as the official Amended Redevelopment Plan for the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area. SECTION 16. The City Council hereby finds and determines that: It is necessary and/or desirable to adopt the Amended Redevelopment Plan to encompass the property referred to in the Amended Redevelopment Plan and to authorize the development and/or construction of such facilities and/or improvements as are set forth in the Amended Redevelopment Plan. The Project Area has previously been determined to be a blighted area, the redevelopment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purpose declared in the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety code Section 33000 et. seq.). The Amended Redevelopmerit Plan will provide for redevelopment of properties within the Project Area boundaries in a manner conforming with the Call fornia Community Redevel opment Law and in the interests of the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare. This finding is based upon the fact that redevelopment of the Project Area will implement the objectives of the Community Redevelopment Law and the City's General Plan by aiding in the elimination and correction of the conditions of blight, providing for planning, development, redesign, clearance, reconstruction or rehabilitation of properties which need improvement, and providing for higher economic utilization of potentially useful land. The adoption and carrying out of the Amended Redevel opment P1 an is economically sound and feasible since it is based upon the Preliminary Redevelopment Plan which has been shown to be both economically sound and feasible as a financing mechanism for the Agency. Among other reasons this finding is based on the fact that under the Amended R~development Plan no public redevelopmerit activity will be undertaken unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity. The Amended Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General Plan of the City. This finding is substantiated by the findings of the Planning Commission that the Amended Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General Plan for the City. 1297 The carrying out of the Amended Redevelopmerit Plan will promote the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the community and will effectuate the purposes and policy of the California Community Redevelopment Law. This finding is based on the fact that redevelopment will benefit the Project Area by correcting conditions of blight and by coordinating public and private actions to stimulate development and improve the economic, social, and physical conditions of the Project Area. The condemnation of real property is provided for in the Amended Redevelopment Plan and is necessary to the execution of the Amended Redevelopment Plan and adequate provisions have been made for payment for property to be acqui red as provided by 1 aw. The relocation of persons or businesses is not anticipated or at best would be minimal. However, the Redevelopmerit Agency has a feasible method or plan for the relocation of families and persons who might be temporarily or permanently displaced from the Project Area through the implementation of the Amended Redevelopment Plan. This finding is based upon the fact that the Amended Redevelopmerit Plan provides for relocation assistance according to law. There are or are being provided in the Project Area, or in other areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities, and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of, and available to, such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. This finding is based upon the fact that no person or family will be required to move from any dwelling unit until suitable replacement housing is available. There is noncontiguous area contained in the Project Area. The previous inclusion of any lands, buildings, or improvements which were not detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare was necessary for the effective redevelopmerit of the Project Area of which they are a part; and that the areas included were and are necessary for effective redevelopment in the community and are not included for the purpose of obtaining the allocation of tax increment revenues from the area pursuant to Section 33670 of the California Heal th and Safety Code without other substantial justification for their inclusion. This finding is based upon the fact that the boundaries of the Project Area were chosen as a unified and consistent whole to include lands that were underutilized because of blighting influences, or affected by the existence of blighting influences, and land uses significantly contributing to the conditions of blight, whose inclusion were and are necessary to accomplish the objectives and benefits of the Redevelopment Plan. 1298 The elimination of blight and the redevelopment of the Project Area could not be reasonably expected to be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without the aid and assistance of the Agency. This finding is based upon the continued existence of blighting influences, including the lack of adequate public improvements and facilities, and the inability of individual developers to economically remove these blighting influences without substantial public assistance in providing adequate public improvements and facilities, the inability of low- and moderate-income persons to finance needed improvements, and the inadequacy of other governmental programs and financing mechanisms to eliminate the blight, including the provision of necessary public improvements and facilities. The effect of tax increment financing will not cause a significant financial burden or detriment on any taxing agency deriving revenues from the Project Area. This finding is based, among other reasons, upon the fact no substantial evidence supporting the finding that the redevelopment project will cause or has caused a financial burden or detriment to taxing agencies has been submitted to the Agency pursuant to Sections 33401, 33353.5 and 33012 of the California Health and Safety Code. Furthermore, this finding is based upon the fact that the financial data, contents, and analysis as set forth in the Report of the Agency to the City Council in no wa~ indicates that the Amended Plan will cause or has caused a financial detriment or burden to any taxing agency. The Amended Redevelopment Plan will afford the maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of such area by private enterprise. The Amended Redevelopment Plan contains adequate safeguards so that the work of redevelopment will be carried out pursuant to the Amended Redevelopment Plan, and it provides for the retention of controls and the establishment of restrictions and covenants running with the land sold or leased for private use for periods of time and under conditions specified in the Amended Redevelopment Plan, which this City Council deems necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Community Redevelopment Law. All of the recitals of fact set forth in Section 16 are true and correct. SECTION 17. The City Council, although it does not contemplate the relocation of residents, is satisfied that within the Project Area boundaries or within the greater community, permanent housing facilities either exist or will be available within three years of the time occupants of the Project Area are displaced, and pending the development of such facilities, there will be -dequate housing available to such displaced occupants at rents comparable to ~ose in the community at the time of their displacement. No persons or families of low- or moderate-income shall be displaced from from residences unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such displaced persons or families at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary, and otherwise standard dwellings. The Agency shall not displace any such persons or families until such housing units are available and ready for occupancy. SECTION 18. The City Council acknowl edges that not less than twenty percent (20%) of the revenue derived from the allocation of taxes, pursuant to Section 33670 of the California Health and Safety Code, from the Project Area shall be used by the Redevelopment Agency for the purpose of increasing and improving the community's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income, and very low-income households unless, through the implementation of the Amended Redevelopmerit Plan, one of the following findings are made: That no need exists in the community to improve or increase the supply of low- and moderate-income housing in a manner which would benefit the Project Area; or b. That some stated percentage less than twenty percent (20%) of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency is sufficient to meet such housing need; or That a substantial effort to meet low- and moderate-income housing needs in the community is being made, and that this effort, including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from State, local, and Federal sources for low- and moderate-income housing alone, or in combination with the taxes allocated under this provision, is equivalent in impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this provision. The City Council shall consider the need which can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons and families of low- or moderate-income or very-low income households from within, or adjacent to, the Project Area because of increased employment opportunities or because of any other direct or indirect result of implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. SECTION 19. The City Council further finds and determines that the Project Area is a "predominantly urbanized" area of the City as said term is defined in Section 33320.1 of the California Health and Safety Code. 1300 SECTION 20. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of ,e Amended Redevelopment Plan which is hereby approved and adopted, it is found and determined that certain official actions all of which are regularly authorized to occur by the City must be undertaken by the City with reference to, among other things, the following: Institution and completion of proceedings for opening, closing, vacating, widening, or changing the grades of streets, alleys, and other public rights-of-way, and for other necessary modifications of the streets, the street layout, and other public rights-of-way in the Project Area. Such action by the City shall include the requirement of abandonment and relocation by the public utility companies of their operations in public rights-of-way as appropriate to carry out this Plan. Institution and completion of proceedings necessary for changes and improvements in publicly-owned public utilities within or affecting the Project Area. The undertaking and completion of any other proceedings necessary to carry out the Project. Revision of zoning within the Project Area to permit the land uses and development authorized by this Plan, provided that such action is consistent with Article VI of this Plan. Imposition wherever necessary (by Conditional Use Permits or other means) of appropriate controls, within the limits of this Plan upon parcels in the Project Area to ensure their proper development and use. Provision for administrative enforcement of this Plan by the City after development. The City and the Agency shall develop and provide for enforcement of a program for continued maintenance by owners of all real property, both public and private, within the Project Area throughout the duration of this Plan. Performance of the above {and of all other functions and services relating to public heal th, safety, and physical development normally rendered in accordance with a schedule which will permit the development of the Project Area) shall be commenced and carried to completion without unnecessary delays. SECTION 21. The City Council agrees and does hereby: Pledge its cooperation in helping to carry out the Amended Redevelopment Plan and requests the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City having administrative responsibilities in the premises, likewise to cooperate to such extent and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner which is consistent with the Amended Redevelopment Plan. 1301 Stand ready to consider the taking of appropriate action upon proposals and measures which are designed to effectuate the Amended Redevelopment Plan. SECTION 22. That certain document entitled "Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan for the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area", the maps contained therein, and such other reports as are incorporated therein by reference, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City, having been duly reviewed and considered, is hereby incorporated in this Ordinance by reference and made a part hereof, and as so incorporated is hereby designated, approved, and adopted as the official "Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan for the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area". SECTION 23. The City Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency, and the Agency is vested with the responsibility of carrying out the Amended Redevelopmerit Plan. SECTION 24. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego, a description of the land within the Project Area, and a statement that proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area have been instituted under the California Community Redevelopment Law. The Agency is hereby directed to effectuate recordation of documents in accordance with the provisions of Section 27295 of the Government Code to the extent they are applicable. SECTION 25. The Building Department of the City is hereby directed, 3r a period of two years, to advise all applicants for building permits in ~ne Project Area boundaries that the site for which a building permit is being sought for the construction of buildings or for other improvements is within the Project Area and subject to the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan. SECTION 26. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of the description and statement recorded by the City Clerk pursuant to Section 24 of this Ordinance, a copy of this Ordinance, and a map or plat, indicating the boundaries of the Project Area, to the auditor and tax assessor of the County of San Diego, to the governing body of each of the taxing agencies which levies taxes upon any property in the Project Area, and to the State Board of Equalization, within thirty (30) days following the adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION 27. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or the Amended Redevelopment Plan, is challenged in a court of competent jurisdiction and is thereafter declared to be unconstitutional, illegal, inoperative, or otherwise ineffective, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and the Amended Redevelopmerit Plan, and each part thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more parts thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 1302 SECTION 28. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days ,ter its final passage and adoption and the Agency shall be vested with the responsibility of implementing and carrying out the Amended Redevelopment Plan and is directed to undertake all activities and/or projects as is provided, authorized, or contemplated in the said Amended Redevelopment Plan in order to provide for the redevelopment of the Project Area. SECTION 29. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published and posted in the manner provided by the City and appropriate provisions of State Law. SECTION 30. The Amended Town Centre II Redevelopmerit Plan as approved by this Ordinance shall hereinafter include the recommended amendments, revisions and/or modifications, if any, as are set forth in the official minutes of the May 7, 1987 joint public hearing of the City Council, Redevelopment Agency, Agency, Planning Commission, and Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area Committee. Presented by Approved as to form by WPC 2896H 1303 CI FINALLY PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD FIRST READ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE OF CHULA VISTA,, CALIFORNIA., HELD Hay 7 19 87 AND May 19 19 87 , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE., TO-WIT: AYES: Councilmen: McCandliss, Cox, Moore, Nader NAYES: Councilmen: Malcolm None ABSTAIN: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: ~/~~C~'of ~ Vista Acting Deputy,/City Clerk STA, .- OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) s s. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chulo Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is o full, true and correct copy of ORDINANCE NO, ,end that the some has not been amended or repealed. DT ~ / CIW OF CHUIA VISTA CC-660 Acting D~ ' C~ty zClerk /~2 1304 II It Bromdwiy Avenue I Ik Fifth AY nue i'~ INTERGTATr b ~ t FRrrWAV I i:* ' L EG D TOWN CENTRE II REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Project Area Boundary 1305 TOWN CENTRE II REDEVRLOP~NT PROJECT AI~A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Those portions of quarter sections 147, 148, 163 and 164 of Chula Vista accord- ing to map thereof No. 505, filed in the office of the County Recorder, County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 155 (records of said County), being a point on the northerly line of "H" Street (80 ft. wide); 1. thence westerly, along the northerly line of said "H" Street, a distance of 2,040 ft. more or less to the westerly line of Broadway; thence southerly, along the westerly llne of Broadway, a distance of 1,400 ft. more or less to the southerly line of "I" Street; thence easterly, along the southerly line o~f "I" Street, 2,040 ft. more or less to the southerly prolongation of the westerly line of Custom Builders No. 2 subdivision per map thereof No. 3137, records of said County; thence northerly, along said westerly line, 1,400 ft. more or less to the point of beginning. ,, 1306 CI'IY OF CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT May 27, 1987 To Whom It May Concern: This is to certify that procedures for the redevelopment of the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Project have been instituted as prescribed in Part 1 of Division 24 of California Community Redevelopment Law and statutes r ' , ' 000 et. seqo Paul Go Desrochers Community Development Director PGD:FK:rd 276 FOURTH AVENUE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92010/{619) 691-5047 May 27, 1987 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO County Clerk/Recorder P.O. Box 1750 San Diego, California 92112 SUBJECT: Dear Sir: Recordation of Description of the Land Within the Amended Town Centre II Project _~rsuant to Section 33373 of the California Health and Safety Code the following documents are hereby submitted to you for recordation prior to June 1, 1987. 1. Ordinance No. 2207 of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopting the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopmerit Plan; 2. Legal description of the land within the boundaries of the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project; and 3. A statement that proceedings for redevelopment of the Amended Town Centre II Project have been instituted. 4. A map of the Town Centre II Redevelopmerit Project Area. oge - two May 27, 1987 Please initiate recordation of these documents upon receipt of this letter. Three copies of each are provided. Please maintain one copy for recordation purposes and return two (2) to the above address with proof of recordation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our office. Sincerely, Jennie Fulasz, City Clerk City of Chula Vista JF/m ~closures: cc: Mr. Paul Desrochers, Community Development Director City of Chula Vista May 27, 1987 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Controllers Office 1600 Pacific Highway San Diego, California 92112 Attention: Mr. Rod Calvao, Controller SUBjECT: Amended Town Centre~II Redevelopment Plan Transmittal of Adopted Documents Dear Sir: 'n May 19, 1987 the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopted Ordinance 3. 2207 approving and adopting the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopmerit Plan. Pursuant to Section 33375 of the California Health and Safety Code the following documents are transmitted to you for your information. 1. Ordinance No. 2207 of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopting the Redevelopment Plan as recorded with the County of San Diego. 2. Legal description of the land within the boundaries of the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project as recorded with the County of San Diego. A statement that proceedings for redevelopment of the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Project have been instituted as recorded with the County of San Diego. 4. A map of the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area. .age - two May 27, 1987 This letter and the documents enclosed are Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency the City Manager of the City of Chula Vista. please do not hesitate to call our office. Sincerely, transmitted on behalf of the of the City of Chula Vista and Should you have any questions, Jennie Fulasz, City Clerk City of Chula Vista JF/m enclosures: John Goss, City Manager City of Chula Vista Mr. Paul Desrochers, Community Development Director City of Chula Vista May 27, 1987 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Tax Assessors Office 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 103 San Diego, California 92102 ATTENTION: Mr. Gregory J. Smith, Assessor SUBJECT: Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan Transmittal of Adopted Documents Dear Sir: On May 19, 1987 the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopted Ordinance 7. 2207 approving and adopting the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan. ~ursuant to Section 33375 of the California Health and Safety Code the following documents are transmitted to you for your information. 1. Ordinance No. 2207 of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopting the Redevelopment Plan as recorded with the County of San Diego. 2. Legal description of the land within the boundaries of the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project as recorded with the County of San Diego. A statement that proceedings for redevelopment of the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Project have been instituted as recorded with the County of San Diego. 4. A map of the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area. _age - two Hay 27, 1987 This letter and the documents enclosed are transmitted on behalf of the Executive Director of Redevelopment Agency the City of Chula Vista and the City Manager of the City of Chula Vista. Should you have any questions, pleas~ do not hesitate to call our office. Sincerely, Jennie Fulasz, City Clerk City of Chula Vista JF/m enclosures: Mr. John Goss, City Manager City of Chula Vista Mr. Paul Desrochers, Community Development Director City of Chula Vista May 27, 1987 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION P. O. Box 799 Sacramento, California 95808 SUBJECT: Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan Transmittal of Adopted Documents Dear Sir: On May 19, 1987 the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopted Ordinance No. 2207 approving and adopting the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan.Pursuant to Section 33375 of the California Health and Safety Code the ~llowing documents are transmitted to you for your information. i. Ordinance No. 2207 of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopting the Redevelopment Plan as recorded with the County of San Diego. 2. Legal description of the land within the boundaries of the Town Centre II Redevelopmerit Project as recorded with the County of San Diego. A statement that proceedings for redevelopment of the Amended Town Centre II Redevelopment Project have been instituted as recorded with the County of San Diego. 4. A map of the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area. age - two May 27, 1987 This letter and the documents enclosed are Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency the City Manager of the City of Chula Vista. please do not hesitate to call our office. Sincerely, transmitted on behalf of the of the City of Chula Vista and Should you have any questions, Jennie Fulasz, City Clerk City of Chula Vista JF/m oc: John Goss, City Manager City of Chula Vista Paul Desrochers, Community Development Director City of Chula Vista rATE OF CALIFORNIA ~TA'~ ,OARD OF EQUALIZATION AX AR~:A SERVICES SECTION 719 24TH STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 'O. BOX 1713, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95808-1713 ~s. Jennie Fulase City Clerk City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 92010 June 3, 1987 Dear Ms. Fulase: This is to acknowledge receipt of Ordinance No. 2207 adop- ting and approving the amendment to the redevelopment plan for the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project within the City of Chula Vista. Also received were the map and description of the amended project boundaries. Your filing is hereby accepted. These documents are ready for processing on the 1988 Board Roll. We will establish the tax-rate area codes needed to identify this project amendment. This will facilitate the future computation of tax increments. We find that the final boundaries are identical to the preliminary ones and that the ordinance was adopted within the time frame specified in the Statement of Preparation. The 1978-79 base-year values of state-assessed properties are enclosed. These values replace the ones sent to you on December 31, 1986, which erroneously used the 1986-87 assessed value as base JW:kasn CC: year . San Diego County Assessor San Diego County Auditor Mr. Paul Desrochers Community Development Director City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 92010 ( 91 6 ) ,332-7185 June 3, 1987 Mr. Rod Calvao Auditor-Controller San Diego County 1600 Pacific Highway Room 166 San Diego, California 92101 Dear Mr. Calvao: Pursuant to Section 33328 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code, the 1978-79 assessed values of state-assessed property within the boundaries of the adopted Amendment to the Town Centre II within the 'I'tty of Chula Vista are listed below. Company Tax-rate Area San Diego Gas Pacific Bell Western Union TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 1000 & Electric Co. Telegraph WITHIN PROJECT Land Improvements Personal 21,690 27,780 930 49,470 930 49,4~n 930 DJM:kasn Sincerely, David J. Martin Redevelopment Specialist VALUATION DIVISION