HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009/06/09 Item 5
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
~\{t.- CITY OF
~ - (HULA VISTA
JUNE 9, 2009, Item~
ITEM TITLE:
TIfYESTMENT REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 2009
DIRECTOROFFmf!C /TREASVRER~
CITY MANAGER
ASSISTAl"JT CITY' ANAGER <7 '/
SUBi\UTTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
4/5THS VOTE: YES D NO ~
SUlVIMARY
Transmitted herewith is the City's investment report for the quarter ended March 3 1,2009. To
meet the reporting requirements set forth in the California Government Code Sections 53600 el
seq. and the City of Chula Vista Investment Policy, a separate report was distributed to the City
Council as an informational item.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a
"Project" as defined under Section 15378 (b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore,
pursuant to Section l5060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to
CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Council accept the report.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
The total cash and investment portfolio as of March 31, 2009 was $186,001,303. This is a
decrease of approximately $2,804,205 from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009. For the
quarter ended March 31,2009, the earned interest yield was 2.747%, a decrease from the 3.404%
reported for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, reflecting reinvestment in a lower interest rate
environment and of maturing securities purchased in periods of higher interest rates. The
weighted average maturity as of March 31, 2009 was 2.11 years which was the same as last
5-1
JUNE 9, 2009, Ite~
Page 2 of2
quarter. The weighted average maturity remains sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all
operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated.
DECISION iVIAKER CONFLICT
Staff has determined that the action contemplated by this item is ministerial, secretarial, manual,
or clerical in nature and, as such, does not require the City Council members to make or
participate in making a governmental decision, pursuant to California Code of Regulations
section I 8702.4(a). Consequently, this item does not present a conflict under the Political
Reform Act (California Government Code S 87100, et seq.).
FISCAL IMPACT
,
Considering the projected timing of cash receipts and disbursements, including the proceeds
from the Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note borrowing and the structure of the Pooled
Investment Portfolio, the City should be able to comfortably meet overall cash flow needs over
the next six months. There is no direct fiscal impact by this action.
A TT ACHMENTS
A. Investment Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
Prepared by: N. Mandery. Treasury Manager. Finance Dept.
5-2
~~~
~
~~~..:E
CITY OF
CHULA VISTA
Finance Department
Investment Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
June 9, 2009
Honorable Mayor and City Council
I am pleased to present this report of investment activity for the quarter ended March
31, 2009 in compliance with the reporting requirements as set forth in the California
Government Code Sections 53600 et seq. and the City of Chula Vista Investment
Policy. The information presented in this report highlights the investment activity for the
quarter ended as well as provides a comparison to the quarters ended June 30, 2008
and March 31, 2008.
Market Overview
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) maintained the key Fed Funds rate at a
target range of 0.00% to 0.25% which is the lowest rate on record. It is expected that
weak economic conditions will keep this rate low for some time. Weak holiday sales,
falling home prices, and increasingly high unemployment rates are all contributing
factors. Two-year Treasuries yielding 0.76% at the beginning of the quarter climbed
slightly to 0.80% at the end of the quarter as the markets move toward a slow recovery.
The Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury have instituted various programs to help
stabilize the financial industry such as increasing the FDIC insurance on bank deposits
and guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest on certain corporate
bonds issued under their Treasury Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). The affects of
these programs are just starting to be felt as there are indications that the economy is
beginning to stabilize at very low levels.
Portfolio Composition
The table below provides a summary of the City's total investment portfolio as of March
31,2009. The Investment Portfolio ($179,281,781) CashlTime Deposits ($6,719,522)
and Bank Trustee/Fiduciary Funds ($151,973,881) continue to be invested in
accordance with the Government Code, bond covenants and the Council Investment
Policy as adopted on February 17, 2009.
5-3
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Investment Report Quarter ended 3/31/2009
Page 2 of5
Summary of Cash and Investments as of March 31,2009
%of
Investment Type Par Value Market Value Book Value Portfolio
Investment Portfolio
Federal Securities 120,000,000 120,443,537 119,975,200 34.81%
Pooled Investments 55,281,781 55,445,359 55,281,781 16.04%
Camorate Bonds 4,000,000 4,072,200 3,992,960 1.16%
Subtotal 179,281,781 179,961,096 179,249,941 50.85%
Cash/Time Deposits $6,719,522 $6,719,522 $6,719,522 1,95%
Total Cash & Investments Held by the City $186,001,303 $186,680,618 $185,969,463 53.96%
Held by Bank Trustee/Fiduciary Funds (1)
U. S. Government 56,418,464 66,844,183 56,418,464 16.37%
Investment Agreements 25,868,339 25,868,339 25,868,339 7.51%
Mutual Funds 55,645,569 55,645,569 55,645,569 16.14%
Cash with Fiscal Agents 0 0 0 0.00%
Restricted Cash 14,041,510 14,041,510' 14,041,510 4.07%
Total Held by Bank Trustee/Fiduciary Funds $151,973,881 $162,399,600 $151,973,881 44.09%
Total Portfolio $344,694,706 $355,799,740 $344,662,866 100.00%
(1) Reflects bond proceeds held by trustee in accordance with bond covenants.
The graph below provides a snapshot of the portfolio composition by investment type for
that portion of the portfolio not held by the bank trustee or in a fiduciary fund,
Portfolio Composition
as of March 31,2009
US Government
Agency
66.93%
Corporate
Coupon Bonds
2.23%
~ LAlF (State Pool)
30.28%
Portfolio Performance
Portfolio performance is provided in more detail in the attachments to the report. The
summary information provided below includes the total portfolio income recognized for
the last quarter as compared to the prior quarter and the same quarter one year ago.
5-4
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Investment Report Quarter ended 3/31/2009
Page 3 of 5
Total Portfolio Income Recognized
Accrual Basis
Total Portfolio
March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
March 31, 2008
Quarter-End
Net Interest Earnings
Net Gains (Losses) from Sales
Net Total Income Recognized
$ 1,361,958 $ 1,637,055 $ 2,137,009
$ 24,938 $ $ (77,130)
$ 1,386,896 $ 1,637,055 $ 2,059,879
$ 4,839,146 $ 3,477,188 $ 6,676,247 .
$ 24,938 $ $ 246,723
$ 4,864,084 $ 3,477,188 $ 6,922,970
Fiscal Year-ta-Date
Net Interest Earnings
Net Gains (Losses) from Sales
Net Total Income Recognized
This info comes from the monthly Sympro "Interest Earnings Summary" reports.
Benchmark Comoarison
The following graph compares the monthly earned interest yield of the City's Portfolio
Fund with the monthly average yields for the same period of the State of California
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the two-year and three-year treasury from
March 2007 through March 2009.
Monthly Benchmark Comparison
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
Mar-07
Jun-07
Sep-07 Dee-07 Mar-OB Jun-08 Sep-08
I-+-City ---m--LAIF --'-ZyrTreasury -....a-3yrTreasury I
b-b
Dee-08
Mar-09
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Investment Report Quarter ended 3/31/2009
Page 4 of 5
Per Section 16.1 of the City's Investment Policy, the two-year U.S. Treasury and the
Local Agency Investment Fund yields are the
performance benchmarks to be used when
determining whether market yields are being
achieved. The three-year U.S. Treasury is
added as an additional point of reference in
order to provide an upper range that is above the
weighted average maturity of the City's portfolio,
which is at 770 days.
;~lL4il%~~~:~f/lf~%'~~;~~,P,i~;1~~Yrera'i~~~i?;3~;f!AD M;;~
City 2.75% 770
LAIF 1 .82% 197
2 Year Treasury 0.80% 730
3 Year Treasury 1 .1 5% 1 ,095
ADM - Averaqe Davs to Maturitv
Investment Activitv
During the quarter, sixteen investments totaling $57,000,000 maturedlexpired or were
redeemed. These monies represent pooled cash received from various funding sources
such as sewer, RDA, TDIF, PAD, General Fund, etc. The majority of these funds were
reinvested through the purchase of seventeen Federal Agency Securities and one
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP) Corporate bond totaling $62,000,000
using the City's Investment Policy guideline to ensure safety, liquidity and yield.
Although staff has been reluctant to purchase corporate bonds due to the uncertainties
of the market, the purchase of this corporate bond is through the TLGP, which is a
federally guaranteed program that offers the safety of a treasury note but with a higher
yield. This type of investment also allows for more diversification within the portfolio.
There is no further activity to report on other than routine investments in money market
mutual funds by the City's fiscal-agents.
Conclusion
The total cash and investment portfolio as of March 31, 2009 was $186,001,303. This
is a decrease of approximately $2,804,205 from December 31,2008 to March 31,2009.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the earned interest yield was 2.747%, a
decrease from the 3.404% reported for the quarter ended December 31, 2008,
reflecting reinvestment in a lower interest rate environment and of maturing securities
purchased in periods of higher interest rates.
The weighted average maturity as of March 31, 2009 was 2.11 years which was the
same as the prior quarter. The weighted average maturity remains sufficiently liquid to
enable the City to meet all operating requirements that might be reasonably anticipated.
. .
Considering the projected timing of cash receipts and disbursements, including the
proceeds from the Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note borrowing and the structure of
the Pooled Investment Portfolio, the City should be able to comfortably meet overall
cash flow needs over the next six months. There is no direct fiscal impact by this action.
5-6
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Investment Report Quarter ended 3/31/2009
Page 5 of 5
I certify that this report reflects the City of Chula Vista and related agencies pooled
investments and is in conformity with the State of California Government Code on
authorized investments and with the Investment Policy of the City of Chula Vista as stated
in Resolution No. 2008-54 dated February 17, 2009.
Respectfully submitted,
JnCLc- ~~
Maria Kachadoorian
Director of FinancefTreasurer
5-7