The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2009/06/09 Agenda PacketI declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Chula Vista in the Office of the City Clerk and that I posted this document on the bulletin board accordin9~tq Brown Act requirements. ~\1 ~~ I~ted h 1 Signed ~_ CITY OF CHULA VISTA Cheryl Cox, Mayor f~~~~^`~ / Rudy Ramirez, Councilmember James D. Sandoval, City Manager ///J~~~///"`///-//// John McCann, Councilmember Bart Miesfeld, City Attorney Pamela Bensoussan, Councilmember Donna Norris, City Clerk Steve Castaneda, Councilmember JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA June, 9, 2009 4:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Council Chambers City Hall, Building 100 276 Fourth Avenue ROLL CALL: CounciUAgency/Authority Members: Bensoussan, Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, and Mayor/Chair Cox PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY • OATH OF OFFICE : David Flores, Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation • RECOGNITION OF THE BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION CARES PROGRAM DONATION TO THE SOUTH BAY LITTLE LEAGUE AND PONY LEAGUE, FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE MAX FIELD FACILITIES AT REINSTRA PARK, MAY 2009 CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1-6) The Council will enact the Consent Calendar staff recommendations by one motion, without discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or staff requests that an item be removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed immediately following the Consent Calendar. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of January 24, January 26, the Special and Regulaz Meetings of January 27, February 3, and February 10, 2009. Staff recommendation: Council approve the minutes. 2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter of Resignation from Gregory Alabado, member of the Housing Advisory Commission. Staff recommendation: Council accept the resignation and direct the City Clerk to post the vacancy in accordance with Maddy Act requirements. 3. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING SECTION 2.04.020 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TIME AND PLACE OF COUNCIL MEETINGS (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) In accordance with Section 306 of the Chula Vista City Charter, Section 2.04.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code sets the time and place for all meetings of the City Council. The current ordinance sets the time on the first Tuesday of each month at 4:00 p.m., and on the second, third, and fourth Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. In an effort to reduce costs associated with staffing City Council meetings, it is recommended that the time for the second, third, and fourth Tuesday meetings be set at 4:00 p.m. This ordinance was introduced on June 2, 2009. (City Manager) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the ordinance. 4. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO THE "OTAY LAKES ROAD WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS FROM CANYON DRIVE TO TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD / LA MEDIA (STM-355)" PROJECT FROM THE AVAILABLE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUNDS BALANCE (4/STHS VOTE REQUIRED) In Fiscal Yeaz 2004/2005, the Council approved the appropriation of $900,000 to begin the preliminary design and investigation work for the Otay Lakes Road (OLR) Widening from Canyon Drive to Telegraph Canyon Road to ease traffic congestion and to assure that the City's GMOC thresholds continue to be satisfied. Further traffic studies by staff revealed the need to also construct improvements on East H, between the Southwestern College and Bonita Vista High School entrances to achieve the stated project objectives. With the additional scope and the complexity of this project with regard to right-of--way acquisition and utility coordination, additional funds aze required to continue the critical design, right-of--way acquisition, and environmental stages of the project, as well as develop phased construction plans. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. Page 2 -Council Agenda httv://www.chulavistaca.gov June 9, 2009 5. INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING MARCH 31, 2009 The Quarterly Investment Report provides information on various cash balances, investment transactions and the status of the pooled investment portfolio in accordance with the Government Code and the City's Investment Policy. (Director of Finance) Staff recommendation: Council accept the report. 6. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO A FOUR-PARTY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, INC. (CONSULTANT), AND MCMILLIN OTAY RANCH, LLC AND OTAY PROJECT, LP (APPLICANTS), FOR CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED TO CONDUCTING ADDITIONAL MITIGATION MONITORING SERVICES FOR OLYMPIC PARKWAY, BETWEEN BRANDYWINE AVENUE AND SR-125 Adoption of the resolution approves the first amendment to a four-party agreement with Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., for consulting services related to conducting additional mitigation monitoring services for Olympic Parkway, between Brandywine Avenue and SR-125, for an amount not to exceed $27,345. (Deputy City Manager/Development Services Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Council on any subject matter within the Council's jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits the Council from discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Council may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes. PUBLIC HEARINGS -TIME CERTAIN 6:00 P.M. The following item(s) have been advertised as public hearing(s) as required by law. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. 7. CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF TAX EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED LANDINGS II AFFORDABLE HOUSING APARTMENTS Page 3 -Council Agenda htto://www.chulavistaca. ov June 9, 2009 Chelsea Investment Corporation (CIC) and Brookfield Shea have proposed the development and construction of a 143-unit affordable housing development for low- income households, known as The Landings II. The project is located at the northwest comer of Discovery Falls Drive and Crossroads Street within the Winding Walk master planned community. To finance the project, CIC is requesting that the City Council consider the issuance of a maximum of $39 million in tax exempt obligations by its Housing Authority and execution of a loan agreement for $2.4 million of HOME funds. (Deputy City Manager/Development Services Director) Staff recommendation: Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the following resolutions: A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELNERY OF MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE LANDINGS II AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A LOAN AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, AND CIC LANDINGS, L.P. FOR THE HOME FINANCING OF THE LANDINGS II AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS 8. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 15.60, ABANDONED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY REGISTRATION (Deputy City Manager/Development Services Director) Staff recommendation: Council continue the public hearing to July 14, 2009. 9. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS FOR THE CITY AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010 The City Council has received and considered the City Manager's proposed operating and capital improvement budgets for the City and the Redevelopment Agency and the operating budget for the Housing Authority for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. Work sessions were held on November 17, 2008, December 4, 2008, January 13, 2009 and May 12, 2009 to consider and deliberate on the recommendations contained in the proposed budgets. The budgets submitted at this time for formal adoption represent the City Manager's proposed budgets, as presented in the fiscal year 2009/2010 proposed budget document, amended to reflect various cleanup items. Staff recommendation: CounciUAgency/Authority adopt the following resolutions, and place the ordinance on first reading: Page 4 -Council Agenda hnp://www.chulavistaca.gov June 9, 2009 A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS FOR THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA EXCLUDING CAPITAL PROJECTS LB143, STM355, AND TF344 AND THE INTERFUND LOAN FROM THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND TO THE PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT FEE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR PROJECT LB143 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 3Q 2010 C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IlvIPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR PROJECT STM355 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 D. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR PROJECT TF344 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 E. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE BUDGET FOR AN INTERFUND LOAN FROM THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND TO THE PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT FEE FUND, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 F. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE COMPENSATION SCHEDULE AND CLASSIFICATION PLAN TO REFLECT THE ADDITION AND ELIMINATION OF VARIOUS POSITION TITLES AS REFLECTED IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010 OPERATING BUDGET G. RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE SOUTHWEST/TOWNS CENTER IUOTAY VALLEY/ADDED AREA PROJECT AREA FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 3Q, 2010 H. RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR TOWNS CENTER I AND THE BAYFRONT PROJECT AREAS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 Page 5 -Council Agenda http://www.chulavistaca.aov June 9, 2009 I. RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 3Q 2010 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.05.010 RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF UNCLASSIFIED POSITIONS TO ELIMINATE THE FOLLOWING TITLES -ANIMAL CONTROL MANAGER, ASSISTANT DIItECTOR OF BUDGET AND ANALYSIS, ASSISTANT DIItECTOR OF BUILDING AND HOUSING, ASSISTANT DIItECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF RECREATION, ASSISTANT FIl2E CHIEF, ASSISTANT LIBRARY DIRECTOR, CBAG BUDGET MANAGER, CBAG LEAD PROGRAMMER ANALYST, CHIEF OF STAFF, COASTAL/ ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY CONSULTANT, DIRECTOR OF BUDGET AND ANALYSIS, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS, EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER, GOVERNMENT RELATIONS LIAISON, PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MANAGER, SPECIAL PROJECTS MANAGER; AND TO ADD THE FOLLOWING TITLES -ANIMAL CARE FACILITY MANAGER, BUDGET AND ANALYSIS MANAGER, COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR, DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF, AND FIRE DNISION CHIEF (4/STHS VOTE REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM) OTHER BUSINESS 10. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS 11. MAYOR'S REPORTS 12. COUNCILMEMBERS' COMMENTS Deputy Mayor McCann: Motion to eliminate car allowances for Mayor, City Councilmembers, and Executive and Senior Managers of the City of Chula Vista effective with the next pay period. CLOSED SESSION Announcements of actions taken in Closed Session shall be made available by noon on Wednesday following the Council Meeting at the City Attorney's offtce in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code 54957.7). 13. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: Jim Sandoval, Scott Tulloch, Kelly Bacon, Bart Miesfeld, Maria Kachadoorian, Rod Betts Employee organization: IAFF ADJOURNMENT to the Regular Meeting of June 16, 2009 in the Council Chambers. Page 6 -Council Agenda htro://www.chulavistaca.eov June 9, 2009 Materials provided to the City Council related to any open-session item on this agenda arE available for public review at the City Clerk's Offzce, located in City Hall at 276 Fourth Avenue, Building 100, during normal business hours. In compliance with the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service, contact the Ciry Clerk's Office at (619) 691-5041 at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting. Page 7 -Council Agenda http://www.chulavistaca.gov June 9, 2009 DRAFT MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA January 24, 2009 9:00 A.M. (8:45 a.m. boarding of bllS in parking lot outside of Council Chambers) An Adjourned Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 9:05 a.m. outside of the Council Chambers, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. . ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Councilmembers Bensoussan, Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, and Mayor Cox ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Sandoval, City Attorney Miesfeld, Public Works Director Hopkins, Planning Director Halbert, and Communications Director Pursell and Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation Members Reyes and Munoz CITY TOUR 1. TOUR OF EXISTING AND POTENTIAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SITES, KEY PROJECTS AND SOME PROPOSED ECONOMIC STIMULUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY The tour included visits to the following site locations: Sudbury property/National City Palomar Gateway Los Vecinos (affordable housing) Fire station relocation, Orange Avenue Main Street Infrastructure Auto Park dealerships - Nissan, South Bay Motor Sports Bud Rapid Transit Parking, Palomar Villages of Heritage, Countryside, Hillsborough Little Lake Street (effects of foreclosure ordinance) Deputy Mayor McCann left the tour at 11:00 a.m. At 12:30 p.m., Mayor Cox adjourned the meeting. Eastern Urban Center - University High Tech High The Landings (affordable housing) The Marketplace - Design Center, Village Walk Rancho Del Rey Library site Rice Canyon (fire issues) Infrastructure - Rohr Manor, Willow Street Bridge Old Pier I building Third Avenue Streetscape Plan ~._.~. Lorraine Bennett, CMC, Deputy City Clerk Iii -I DRAFT MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA January 26, 2009 5:00 P.M. A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City ofChula Vista was called to order at 5:01 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Councilmembers Bensoussan, Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, and Mayor Cox ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Sandoval, Assistant City Manager Tulloch, City Attorney Miesfeld CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: Jim Sandoval, Scott Tulloch, Marcia Raskin, Bart Miesfeld, Rod Betts, Maria Kachadoorian, Leah Browder Employee organizations: CVEA, lAFF, POA, WCE, Mid-Management, Professional and Umepresented Groups ACTION: Councilmember Castaneda moved to direct slaffto sign Side Letter of Agreement with the Police Officers Association. Councilmember Ramirez seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT At 5:25 p.m., Mayor Cox adjourned the meeting. ~. ~:e Bennett, CMC. Deputy City Clerk /~::--: I~-I DRAFT MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA January 27, 2009 5:00 P.M. A Special Meeting of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Council/Agency Members Bensoussan, McCann, Ramirez, and Mayor Cox ABSENT: Council/AgeI)cy Member Castaneda ALSO PRESENT: City ManagerlExecutive Director Sandoval, Assistant City Manager Tulloch, City Attorney/General Counsel Miesfeld, Director of Conservation and Environmental Services Meacham, and Deputy City Attorney Maland CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 54957.6 . Agency designated representatives: Jim Sandoval, Scott Tulloch, Marcia Raskin, Bart Miesfeld, Rod Betts, Maria Kachadoorian, Leah Browder Employee organizations: CVEA, IAFF, POA, WCE, Mid-Management, Professional and Unrepresented Groups ACTION: Council/Agency Member McCann moved to approve changes to the Side Letter of Agreement with IAFF. Council/Agency Member Ramirez seconded the motion and it carried 4-0. ADJOURNMENT At 5:34 p.m., Mayor/Chair Cox adjourned the meeting. -- Z- ~- .-?--.--- ~- . """'-Lorraine Bennett, CMC, Deputy City Clerk / Page 1 - CounciVRDA Closed Session Minutes January 27, 2009 Ie -I DRAFT MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA January 27, 2009 6:00 P.M. A Regular Meeting of the City Council and a Special Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City ofChula Vista was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Council/Agency Members Bensoussan (arrived at 6:01 p.m.), Castaneda (arrived at 6:41 p.m.), McCann, Ramirez, and Mayor Cox ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: City Manager/Executive Director Sandoval, City Attorney/General Counsel Miesfeld, City Clerk Norris, and Deputy City Clerk Belmett PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY PRESENTATION BY JENNETTE LAWRENCE. DIRECTOR OF GOVERNMENT & COMMUNITY RELA nONS, F AMIL Y HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO, TO LOU EL-KHAZEN AND SCOTT HARRIS OF THE CHULA VISTA PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR THEIR WORK ON THE CHULA VISTA FAMILY 'HEALTH CENTER TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Jennette Lawrence thanked City staff for their work on the project, in particular Scott Harris and Lou EI-Khazen. Mayor Cox armounced that Item 12A would be taken out of order and discussed at this time. 12. COUNCIL/AGENCY MEMBERS' COMMENTS A. Deputy Mayor McCarm - Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Coach Clark Moses and the Eastlake Panthers Mighty Mite Black Team for their Win at the American Youth Football National Championship. Deputy Mayor McCarm recognized the Eastlake Panthers Mighty Mite Black Team for their win at the American Youth Football National Championship. Coach Clark Moses thanked the Council for acknowledging the team, introduced the coaching staff, and spoke about the team's achievements this past season. Deputy Mayor McCarm then presented the students and coaches with Certificates of Recognition. Page 1 - CouncillRDA Minutes January 27, 2009 1/)-1 DRAFT CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1-6) 1. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter of resignation from Tim Jones, Growth Management Oversight Commission (Business Representative) Staff recommendation: Council accept the resignation and direct the City Clerk to post the vacancy in accordance with Maddy Act requirements. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of November 4 and November 17,2008. Staff recommendation: Council approve the minutes. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-013, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE "SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 JY0650" PROJECT TO OLYMPIC ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $49,886.25, WAIVING COUNCIL POLICY 574-01, AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO EXPEND ALL AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT On December 24, 2008, the City received sealed bids for this project. The project was included in the budget to remove and replace curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveways displaced by differential settling, tree roots, etc., on various City streets. (City EngineerIPublic Works Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-014, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SIMON WONG ENGINEERING INC., FOR THE WILLOW STREET BRIDGE PROJECT In 2005, the Council approved an agreement with Simon Wong Engineering Inc. in the amount of $1,181,891 for environmental and engineering services required for the rehabilitation or replacement of the Willow Street Bridge. In accordance with required Caltrans procedures, an analysis was conducted to determine the feasibility of a bridge replacement versus a bridge rehabilitation. The analysis determined that a bridge replacement was the preferred strategy and rehabilitation would not be cost effective. As a result, additional environmental and engineering services are required in order to complete design for the new bridge. (City EngineerIPublic Works Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. Page 2 - CounciVRDA Minutes January 27.2009 I '0-).., DRAFT CONSENT CALENDAR (continued) 5. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-015, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING A TOTAL OF $18,853.30 FROM THE AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE TO REIMBURSE HERMES ZUAZO (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) Mr. Zuazo has paid fees to satisfy certain permit fees for Building Permit Number BR06- 0007, associated with his property located at 142 Third Avenue. Mr. Zuazo is now requesting a refund of said fees. (City EngineerlPublic Works Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 6. A. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-016, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND REINSTATEMENT OF THE JANUARY 21, 2003 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE LEASE AND OPERATION OF A SKATE PARK AT GREG ROGERS PARK B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 2.66. SECTION 2.66.255 TO ALLOW BMX BICYCLE USAGE AT THE LEN MOORE SKATE PARK (FIRST READING) The Len Moore Skate Park is operated under an existing agreement with the Boys & Girls Club of Chula Vista. Since beginning operations in 2003, the use of bicycles at the facility has been prohibited and proscribed by City Ordinance. In the time since the opening of the skate park, interest and demand for BMX bicycle access has increased. Experience elsewhere in California and the U.S. has shown that the originally feared negative consequences of bicycle use were without foundation. No significant increase in physical damage or personal injury has occurred where bicycle use is permitted. The proposed amendments will allow BMX bicycle use at Len Moore Skate Park specifically and the ban would remain in force at all other City facilities. (Public Works Director/Recreation Director) Stall recommendation: Council adopt the resolution and hold first reading of the ordinance. ACTION: Deputy Mayor McCann moved to approve staffs recommendations and offered the Consent Calendar, (Items 1 through 6), headings read, text waived. Councilmember Ramirez seconded the motion and it carried 4-0, with Councilmember Castaneda absent. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR There were none. Page 3 - CouncilJRDA Minutes January 27, 2009 /D-3 DRAFT PUBLIC COMMENTS Clara Schaeffer, Chula Vista resident, spoke in support of retaining the DASH program. Ed Herrera, Chula Vista resident, representing the Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association, spoke in opposition to the proposed local sales tax increase. Bridget Barahura, Chula Vista resident, spoke in support of retaining the DASH program, with a suggestion that the City implement a $20-$25 weekly fee per student. Michael Barahura, Chula Vista resident, spoke in support of retaining the DASH program. Steven Pavka, Chula Vista resident, spoke against the City's towing fees. Pricilla Balbuena, Chula Vista resident, spoke in support of retaining the STRETCH program, and of continuing to run the program through the City's Library Division. Lavar Watkins, Chula Vista resident, spoke in support of retaining the STRETCH and DASH programs. Theresa Acerro, Chula Vista resident, representing the Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association, spoke in opposition to the MMC peaker power plant and its proposed location. Rich Redmond, Chula Vista resident, spoke in support of the DASH program. Carlos Lopez, Chula Vista resident, representing Communities Taking Action, spoke III opposition to the MMC peaker power plant. Cynthia Morales, Chula Vista resident, spoke in support of the STRETCH program. Phil Collum, San Diego resident, representing Chula Vista Police Officers Association, announced that the Chula Vista Police Officers had agreed to forgo salary increases for the current and next fiscal year, resulting in over $1.3 million in savings to the City. He spoke in opposition to the proposed cuts to the Department's K-9 program, Drug Enforcement, and the Proactive Gang Enforcement Unit. He also talked about local impacts of the proposed sex offender and registrant enforcement program cuts by the State. Hugo Ivan Salazar, Chula Vista resident, representing Communities Taking Action, suggested that Council write a letter to the California Energy Commission indicating its support to seek an alternative location for the power plant. Celia Benchekroun, Chula Vista resident, did not speak but submitted a speaker card in support of retaining the DASH program. Page 4 - CounciVRDA Minutes January 27, 2009 (b-L/- DRAFT PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PCC-08-020) OPERATION OF A REPLANET RECYCLING REDEMPTION CENTER AT 1315 THIRD A VENUE The applicant is appealing the Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation decision denying a conditional use permit for a small recycling redemption center located at the Sav-A-Lot parking lot, 1315 Third Avenue. (Deputy City Manager/Development Services Director) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AFFIRMING THE CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION'S ACTION DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PCC-08-020), TO OPERATE A SMALL REPLANET RECYCLING BUY BACK CENTER LOCATED AT 1315 THIRD AVENUE IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and at the time specified in the notice. Mayor Cox opened the public hearing, and announced that the item would be continued to the Council meeting of March 3, 2009, and public comments on the item would be heard at that time. ACTION ITEMS 8. CONSIDERATION FOR SUPPORT OF EXTENSION OF THE CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL TO THE SOUTH BAY REGION Established in 1996, the California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) is the state entity responsible for planning, constructing and operating a High-Speed Train (HST) system serving California's major metropolitan areas. With the certification of the Statewide Final Program-Level Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the Authority has begun implementation of the 800-mile high- speed train system serving Sacramento, the San Francisco Bay Area, the Central Valley, Los Angeles, the Inland Empire, Orange County and San Diego. The HST alignment presently being studied terminates at the Santa Fe train station in downtown San Diego. The City would like to pursue studying extending the alignment of the HST into the South Bay. Deputy Mayor McCann introduced the item, and then introduced Cindy Gompper-Graves, representing the South County Economic Development Commission, who spoke in support of the California high speed rail extension and about its economic benefits for the South County. Public Works Director Hopkins stated that, with Council's support, staff would continue to work on the proj ecl. Page 5 - CounciVRDA Minutes January 27, 2009 ID-.5""" DRAFT ACTION ITEMS (continued) Councilmember Ramirez suggested an amendment to the proposed resolution to add the word, "border" as the destination point for the proposed rail system. ACTION: Deputy Mayor McCann moved to adopt the following Resolution No. 2009-017 as amended to add the words, "AND CONNECT TO THE Us. BORDER: ", to the end of the resolution title, heading read, text waived: RESOLUTION NO. 2009-017, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE EXTENSION OF THE CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY (CHSRA) HIGH SPEED TRAIN ALIGNMENT, SOUTH OF THE SANTA FE STATION IN SAN DIEGO TO THE SOUTH BAY REGION AND CONNECT TO THE UNITED STATES BORDER Councilmember Bensoussan seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. Joint Council and Redevelopment Agency Item 9. CONSIDERATION OF AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 Presented for City Council and Redevelopment Agency information and acceptance are the Audited Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, as prepared by the independent audit form of Macias, Gini and O'Connell, LLP. The audit reports submitted for the City and Agency have received unqualified (clean) opinions from the independent audit firm. Finance Director/Agency Treasurer Kachadoorian presented the audited financial statements for fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. She then introduced Kathryn Beseau, representing the auditing firm of Macias, Gini and O'Connell, LLP, who presented the audited financial statements for the City and Redevelopment Agency. ACTION: Mayor/Chair Cox moved to accept the Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Financial Statements. Councilmember Castaneda seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS 10. CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORTS There were none. 11. MA YOR/CHAIR'S REPORTS Ratification of the appointment of Steven Lizarraga to the Grov.'!h Management Oversight Commission. ACTION: Mayor Cox moved to ratify the appointment of Steven Lizarraga to the Growth Management Oversight Commission. Councilmember Castaneda seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. Page 6 - CouncillRDA Minutes January 27. 2009 ID-(" DR.i\FT MAYOR/CHAIR'S REPORTS (continued) Mayor/Chair Cox announced that the Council Meeting would adjourn in memory of the City's Procurement Specialist Jay Harris who recently died in an accident. She extended her condolences to Jay's family and co-workers. Mayor/Chair Cox gave an update on the State budget, and provided information about a proposal for a seven month deferral by the State for highway users' tax accounts, resulting in the anticipated loss of half of a million dollars for the City. Additionally., the State was also planning on deferring Proposition 42 Transportation Revenue, paid quarterly to cities and counties from sales taxes on gasoline. She also stated there was a proposed two-month delay on mandated claims. Additionally, she announced that major freeway construction projects were in jeopardy should the State elect not to pay people over the next two weeks. To that end, she announced that through a partnership between CALTRANS and SANDAG, attempts would be made to rescue at least two local projects, State Highway 52 and the continued construction of Interstate-905. She then commented on her recent discussions with County Supervisor Cox regarding a recommendation for a countywide assessment district where constituents could voluntarily identify solar panel modifications on their property taxes. 12. COUNCIL/AGENCY MEMBERS' COMMENTS A. This item was taken out of order and addressed under Special Orders of the Day. B. Report by the Council Energy Subcommittee (Councilmembers Bensoussan and Castaneda) on the Regional Water Quality Control Board February II, 2009 Public Hearing regarding the South Bay Power Plant NPDES Permit. Councilmember Castaneda spoke about the recent Council Energy Subcommittee meeting, and reported that the South Bay Power Plant had requested to pull its permit to look at more comprehensive ways of updating and amending its methods of water discharge into the bay. He stated that the Energy Subcommittee would be continuing discussions on the status of the south bay power plant, with community updates on the process. Councilmember Bensoussan announced that the next Energy Subcommittee meeting was tentatively scheduled for February 23, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. Deputy Mayor McCann stated that he would be interested in the outcome of a countywide assessment district for solar panels. He again thanked Mighty Mite Coach Clark Moses, and congratulated all who were involved with the team's championship win. Councilmember Castaneda thanked the Police Officers Association on behalf of the constituents, for forgoing its pay raises in an effort to bridge the budget deficit gap. He gave his condolences to the family of Jay Harris. He also extended his condolences to former employee Flora Aristegui, on the recent passing of her son in an accident. Page 7 - CounciVRDA Minutes January 27, 2009 /D-7 DRAFT COUNCIL/AGENCY MEMBER'S COMMENTS (Continued) Councilmember Ramirez thanked the Police Officers Association for stepping up and assisting with City's financial challenges and he looked forward to working with the association to seek long-term solutions to the City's financial situation. He offered his condolences to the families and co-workers of Jay Harris and Flora Aristegui. He requested that City Manager Sandoval pay special attention to targeting staff resources that would position the City well to capture funding from the anticipated government stimulus package for capital improvement projects. CLOSED SESSION Mayor Cox announced that the following Closed Session items had been taken out of order and heard during a Special Meeting that began at 5:00 p.m: 13. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) . City ofChula Vista v. Marie E. Gutierrez, San Diego Superior Court, Case No. 37-2008- 00074648-CU-PT-SC; Terri Loretz v. City ofChula Vista, San Diego Superior Court Case No. GIS28491; Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Case No. D051623. ACTION: Councilmember Ramirez moved to authorize the City Attorney to continue retaining the legal services of Linda Bartz. Mayor Cox seconded the motion and it carried 4-0, with Councilmember Castaneda absent. 14. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(b) One Case No reportable action was taken on this item. 15. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(c) One Case No reportable action was taken on this item. 16. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: Jim Sandoval, Scott Tulloch, Marcia Raskin, Bart Miesfeld, Rod Betts, Maria Kachadoorian, Leah Browder Employee organizations: CVEA, IAFF, POA, WCE, Mid-Management, Professional and Umepresented Groups This item was discussed earlier, during Closed Session at the Special Meeting that began at 5 :00 p.m. Page 8 - CounciVRDA Minutes ID-8 January 27, 2009 . DRAFT ADJOURi'lMENT At 7:37 p.m., Chair/Mayor Cox adjourned the meeting in honor of Jay Harris, to the Regular Meeting of February 3, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. --/ ~. "",-'. .:,;-"-----...------------.... - -. ~ Lorraine Bennett, CMC, Deputy City Clerk Page 9 - COllTIcillRDA Minutes ID~'l January 27, 2009 DRAFT MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA February 3, 2009 4:00 P.M. A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Bensoussan, Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, and Mayor Cox ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Sandoval, City Attorney Miesfeld, City Clerk Norris, and Deputy City Clerk Bennett PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY OATH OF OFFICE Steven Lizarraga to the Growth Management Oversight Commission City Clerk Norris administered the oath of office to Steven Lizarraga, and Deputy Mayor McCann presented him with a certificate of appointment. . INTRODUCTION BY DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/LIBRARY DIRECTOR LEAH BROWDER OF EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH, ERNESTO BARROS, LIBRARIAN II Deputy City Manager/Library Director Browder recognized and introduced employee of the month, Ernesto Barros. Mayor Cox then read the proclamation and CounciImember Castaneda presented it to Ernesto. . INTRODUCTION BY DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/LIBRARY DIRECTOR LEAH BROWDER AND PUBLIC RELATIONS AND PROGRAMMING MANAGER SCOTT LOVE OF THE 5 WINNERS OF THE LIBRARY CARD DESIGN CONTEST: SAMANTHA SINKS, ALEJANDRA RAMIREZ, GRETCHEN KASLER, ANTONIO MARTIN DEL CAMPO, JR., AND NICOLE BELLA AND PRESENTATION OF AWARDS Deputy City Manager/Library Director Browder thanked the community for participating in the contest, and she recognized Public Relations and Programming Manager Scott Love for his leadership with the contest. Mr. Love presented an overview of the Library Card Design Contest. He then introduced each of the library card design winners, Samantha Sinks, Alejandra Ramirez, Gretchen Kasler, Antonio Martin Del Campo, Jr., and Nicole Bella, who each received a certificate ofrecognition. Page I ~ Council Minutes February 3, 2009 ;.e-I DRAFT SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (continued) PRESENTATION BY MAYOR COX OF A PROCLAMATION TO DEBI SCHWARZ, REPRESENTING GOODRICH AEROSTRUCTURES EMPLOYEES, RECOGNIZING THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CHULA VISTA CARES PROGRAM Mayor Cox read the proclamation and Councilmember Ramirez presented it to Debi Schwarz. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1- 5) Item 5 was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion at the request of the public. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of November 18 and 24,2008. Staff recommendation: Council approve the minutes. 2. ORDINANCE NO. 3124, ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 2.66, SECTION 2.66255 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW BMX BICYCLE USAGE AT THE LEN MOORE SKATE PARK (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) Adoption of the ordinance amends the Chula Vista Municipal Code to allow BMX bicycle use at Len Moore Skate Park. This ordinance was introduced on January 27, 2009. (Public Works DirectorlRecreation Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the ordinance. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-018, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE PROVISION OF FAIR HOUSING AND TENANT-LANDLORD DISPUTE SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASING AGENT TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT AND THREE ONE- YEAR OPTIONS TO EXTEND THE AGREEMENT The City ofChula Vista solicited proposals for the provision of Fair Housing and Tenant- Landlord Dispute Services through a Request for Proposal process. South Bay Community Services, the proposed Program Administrator, has a local presence and is currently contracted with the County of San Diego as a sub-contractor for fair housing counseling. Adoption of the resolution approves the contract and an "Authorization Limit" up to $14,583 through June 2009, and authorizes the purchasing agent to execute three additional one-year options to extend in amounts not to exceed $35,000, $35,500, and $35,051, respectively, for a maximum authorized amount of $120,134. (Deputy City Manager/Development Services Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. Page - 2 Council Minutes February 3, 2009 /E-.)... DRA.FT 4. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-019, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONDITIONALL Y APPROVING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE, SUBJECT TO FUTURE APPROPRIATION FROM THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (HOME) PROGRAM IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO- EXCEED $2,400,000 TO CHELSEA INVESTMENT CORPORATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 147 UNIT PROJECT FOR LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, THE LANDINGS AT WINDING WALK-PHASE II, IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE ELEVEN Under the Balanced Communities Policy of the City's General Plan Housing Element, Brookfield Shea Otay, LLC (master developer) has an affordable housing obligation to provide 207 total affordable units 192 low income and 115 moderate income) within the Winding Walk community. The 92 unit low income housing obligation has been satisfied. With the current economic climate and difficulty in obtaining tinancing, the master developer is proposing satisfaction of its moderate income obligation through the development of a second phase of low income housing. Staff recommends providing a pre-commitment of $2,400,000 from its federal HOME Investment Partnership Program funds to assist Chelsea Investment Corporation in obtaining affordable housing financing. (Deputy DirectorlDevelopment Services Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 5. Item 5 was removed from the Consent Calendar. ACTION: Deputy Mayor McCann moved to approve staff's recommendations and offered Consent Calendar Items 1-4, headings read, text waived. Councilmember Ramirez seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Castaneda stated that he would be abstaining from voting on Item 5A, and Councilmember Ramirez stated he would be abstaining from voting on Item 5D, both due to the location of property they own. 5. A. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-020, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE THIRD AVENUE STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN IMPROVEMENTS, CONFIRMING IDENTIFIED LOCAL MATCH FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT, AND STATING THE CITY'S ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT SHOULD GRANT FUNDING BE AWARDED B. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-021, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR PALOMAR STREET PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS FROM THIRD AVENUE TO FOURTH AVENUE, CONFIRMING IDENTIFIED LOCAL MATCH FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT, AND STATING THE CITY'S ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT SHOULD GRANT FUNDING BE A WARDED Page - 3 Council Minutes February 3, 2009 /E.-3 DRAFT ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (continued) C. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-022, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS FROM NAPLES STREET TO PALOMAR STREET, CONFIRMING IDENTIFIED LOCAL MATCH FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT, AND STATING THE CITY'S ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT SHOULD GRANT FUNDING BE A WARDED D. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-023, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE PALOMAR GATEWAY DISTRICT SPECIFIC PLAN, CONFIRMING IDENTIFIED LOCAL MATCH FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT, AND STATING THE CITY'S ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT SHOULD GRANT FUNDING BE A WARDED E. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-024, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE E STREET TRANSIT FOCUS AREA PRECISE PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY, CONFIRMING THE IDENTIFIED LOCAL MATCH FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT, AND STATING THE CITY'S ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT SHOULD GRANT FUNDING BE A WARDED F. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-025, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER TRANSIT OPTIMIZATION STUDY, CONFIRMING IDENTIFIED LOCAL MATCH FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT, AND STATING THE CITY'S ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT SHOULD GRANT FUNDING BE AWARDED The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) has announced available capital improvement and planning project grant funding for Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010 through its competitive TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program. The call-far-projects and guidelines provide qualifying criteria and the grant application deadline is February 6, 2009. Considering the criteria, staff has proposed the submittal of a total of six grant applications; three for capital projects and three far planning projects. Adoption of the resolutions, approve submittal of the applications. (Deputy City Manager/Development Services Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolutions. Page - 4 Council Minutes February 3, 2009 IE ~'I DRAFT ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (continued) Theresa Acerro, Chula Vista resident, representing Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association, expressed concern with the City spending money during the budget crisis. She spoke in opposition to the City hiring any consultants for the project. Advanced Planning Manager Batchelder presented an overview of the proposed SANDAG Smart Growth Incentive Program proposed projects and the funding sources for each. ACTION: Deputy Mayor McCann moved to approve staffs recommendation on Item 5A and offered Resolution No. 2009-020, heading read, text waived. Councilmember Ramirez seconded the motion and it carried 4-0-1, with Councilmember Castaneda abstaining. ACTION: Deputy Mayor McCann moved to approve staffs recommendation on Items 5B, 5C, 5E, and 5F, and offered Resolution Nos. 2009-021,2009-022,2009-024, and 2009-025, headings read, text waived. Councilmember Ramirez seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. ACTION: Deputy Mayor McCann moved to approve staffs recommendation on Item 5D, and offered Resolution No. 2009-023, heading read, text waived. Councilmember Castaneda seconded the motion and it carried 4-0-1, with Councilmember Ramirez abstaining. PUBLIC COMMENTS Steve Eastis, Chula Vista resident, representing the Third A venue Village Association (T A V A), thanked the Council for its support of the recent installation event and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) workshop. He also thanked City staff for their work with the Third Avenue Streetscape design. He reminded the community of the weekly farmers market. Theresa Acerro, Chula Vista resident, representing the Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association, spoke in opposition to the MMC Peaker Power Plant. Imelda Hernandez, Chula Vista resident, spoke in support of retaining the STRETCH program; she stated that she was concerned that the program may be transferred to another provider. Councilmember Ramirez requested that staff provide a report to Council on the status and future of the STRETCH Program. Parks Pemberton, Chula Vista resident, stated that the condition of the City's roads was poor, and that the matter was becoming a safety issue. He suggested that someone in the City should be overseeing contractors working in the streets. He stated that the contractors need to be held accountable when they cut open and close the streets to ensure that the work is done properly. Page - 5 Council Minutes February 3. 2009 IE - 5"" DRAFT PUBLIC HEARING 6. CONSIDERATION OF INTENTION TO FORM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2008-1 (GLENHA VEN WAY) On December 16,2008 the City Council approved the Engineer's Report for the proposed Assessment District AD 2008-01 along Glenhaven Way. Council also set the time and place for this. public hearing and ordered the initiation of assessment balloting proceedings. (Public Works Director) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and at the time specified in the notice. Real Property Manager Ryals presented an overview ofthe Glenhaven Way Assessment process. Deputy Mayor McCann suggested accelerating the program in order to take advantage of the current reduction in construction costs. He also asked staff to communicate with SDG&E on the status of undergrounding options for power lines in future assessment projects. Public Works Director Hopkins responded that although the City had a robust undergrounding program, precedence was given first to arterials, rather than residential, as set forth by criteria previously set by the Council. He stated that communication on the matter of undergrounding was ongoing between City staff and SDG&E. Mayor Cox opened the public hearing. Theresa Acerro, Chula Vista resident, representing the Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association, spoke in support of the project. She thanked the City for its work, and stated she was pleased to see reduced project costs. There being no further members of the public who wished to speak, Mayor Cox closed the public hearing, and directed the City Clerk to tabulate the final ballot count, and certify the election. Councilmember Ramirez suggested that in the future, projects should be prioritized according to the greatest benefit to the public, and that the City's portion of the funding should be based on the public benefits. Councilmember Bensoussan asked about public outreach as far as the process for formation of an assessment district. Public Works Director Hopkins responded that staff would provide information about the process on the City's website. Mayor Cox suggested that a temporary sign be placed at the Glenhaven Way assessment district, indicating that the improvements for the neighborhood were a cooperative effort between property owners and the City. Mayor Cox asked Public Works Director Hopkins to address future road improvements if the government passed an economic stimulus package, and how it would tie in to the proposed work in the Castle Park area. Director Hopkins responded that additional funding would assist with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and wheelchair accessible ramp improvements. Page - 6 Council Minutes February 3, 2009 /e-~ DRAFT PUBLIC HEARING (continued) Deputy City Clerk Bennett announced the results of the ballot tabulation, reporting that 13 ballots were received; of those, 9 were in favor, 3 were opposed, and I ballot did not indicate a yes or a no. Therefore, the proposed assessment district was passed by a majority vote of the residents. ACTION: Deputy Mayor McCann moved to adopt the following Resolution No. 2008-026, heading read, text waived: RESOLUTION NO. 2009-026, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CERTIFYING THE RESULTS OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BALLOT TABULATION FOR PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2008-01 (GLENHA VEN WAY), ORDERING THE FORMATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF SUCH DISTRICT, IMPOSITION OF ASSESSMENTS ON PROPERTIES THEREIN, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS RELATED THERETO Councilmember Castaneda seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS 7. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS City Manager Sandoval reported that staff had reached closure with CalTrans with its support for placement of the auto dealership sign. He reported an anticipated completion date in late 2009. 8. MAYOR'S REPORTS Mayor Cox announced that the Nature Center Subcommittee would be meeting jointly with the Friends of the Nature Center on Monday, February 9, 2009. at 5:30 p.m. at the Chula Vista Nature Center. 9. COUNCILMEMBERS' COMMENTS Deputy Mayor McCann thanked City Manager Sandoval for making progress on the auto dealership sign. He acknowledged and thanked Councilmember Ramirez for his participation in the successful Technology Subcommittee kickoff meeting, and stated that a report on the meeting would be forthcoming to the Council. He stated that he looked forward to moving forward with discussions on the Chargers relocation in a fair and transparent marmer. Furthermore, he stated that he would not be supportive of the relocation if it was not a benefit to the City. He also stated that on January 16. 2009, he attended a meeting with Mr. Fabiani, Plarming Director Halbert, and City Manager Sandoval to discuss moving forward. and that a Chargers Subcommittee meeting would be scheduled for further discussion. Page - 7 Council Minutes February 3. 2009 IE-7 DRAFT COUNCILMEMBERS' COMMENTS (continued) Councilmember Bensoussan stated that the Third Avenue Streetscape Master Plan would be presented at the Northwest Civic Association Meeting on February 9, 2009, at the Chula Vista Public Library. She announced that the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce Installation event was scheduled for Friday, February 6, 2009, and that tickets for the event may still be available. Councilmember Castaneda requested that staff draft a City policy regarding usage of City-issued cell phones, and usage of City-owned equipment by staff. Councilmember Ramirez requested that staff provide an update on the road closure for construction on Third Avenue, between Palomar and Quintard Street. He spoke about his recent Public Office Hours meeting that addressed traffic issues related to sidewalk striping, and parking along Monarch. He asked staff to go back to the residents of the neighborhood to get their feedback on ways to resolve some of the issues related to the condition of their neighborhood. Mayor Cox recessed the meeting to convene in Closed Session at 5:32 p.m. CLOSED SESSION 10. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) . Hector Valenzuela v. Alberto Morales & City of Chula Vista, San Diego Superior Court, Case No. GIS25502 No reportable action was taken on this item. 11. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 54957.6 . Agency designated representatives: Jim Sandoval, Scott Tulloch, Marcia Raskin, Bart Miesfeld, Rod Betts, Maria Kachadoorian, Leah Browder . Employee organizations: CVEA, IAFF, POA, WCE, Mid-Management, Professional and Unrepresented Groups No reportable action was taken on this item. ADJOURNMENT At 5:52 p.m., Mayor Cox adjourned the meeting to the Regular Meeting of February 10, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. " -' ...~ ..~------- - - ------- --Lorraine Bennett, CMC, Deputy City Clerk Page - 8 Council Minutes /e-P February 3, 2009 DRAFT MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA February 10, 2009 6:00 P.M. A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 6:01 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Bensoussan, Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, and Mayor Cox ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Sandoval, City Attorney Miesfeld, City Clerk Norris, and Deputy City Clerk Bennett PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY PRESENTATION BY MAYOR COX OF A PROCLAMATION TO BRAD REMP, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & BUILDING/BUILDING OFFICIAL, FOR HIS RETIREMENT AFTER 19 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Mayor Cox announced that this item would be moved to the Council Meeting of February 24, 2009. . INTRODUCTION BY FIRE CHIEF DAVE HANNEMAN OF FIRE CAPTAIN ROBERT HILL JR. WHO WAS SELECTED TO RECEIVE THE AMERICAN LEGION MEDAL OF VALOR Fire Chief Hanneman introduced and recognized American Legion Medal of Valor recipient, Captain Robert Hill Jr. Mayor Cox spoke on behalf of the Council and thanked Captain Hill, along with the American Legion for keeping the City a safe place to live. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1-6) 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of November 25 and December 2,2008. Staff recommendation: Council approve the minutes. Page 1 - Council Minutes February 10, 2009 /;=:-1 DRAFT CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) 2. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-027, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STATE AND FEDERAL SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY PROGRAM The City has been notified that its approval to participate in the State and Federal Surplus Personal Property Program has expired. This program allows the City to obtain State and Federal surplus property that is in usable condition at a reduced cost. Adoption of the resolution renews the City's eligibility for participation in the program. (Fire Chief) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-028, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 LIBRARY DEPARTMENT BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING ONE-TIME UNANTICIPATED GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,000 FOR THE CHULA VISTA HERITAGE MUSEUM EXHIBIT - HISTORY OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION IN THE SOUTH BAY (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) The Chula Vista Public Library received a one-time grant award from the County of San Diego Community Enhancement Program in the amount of $6,000 for Fiscal Year 2009 designated for the Exhibit, 'History of Public Schools and Education in the South Bay.' (Deputy City Manager/Library Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 4. RESOLUTION 2009-029, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AWARDING A PURCHASE AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $101,047 TO SAN DIEGO FREIGHTLINER FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF A CEMENT MIXING TRUCK The Fiscal Year 2008/2009 Sewer Fund budget provides for the replacement of a cement mixing truck during its normal replacement cycle. The bid was advertised electronically on Planet Bids and in the Star News on December 5, 2008. Six vendors submitted bids; however, two of the bids were submitted late and not opened, and one bid was for a different model. Based on the three bids accepted, staff is recommending that San Diego Freightliner be awarded the purchase agreement. (Public Works Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 5. A. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-030, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE 'SEA VALE STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (CIP NO. SW-244)' PROJECT TO HTA ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $189,636 AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF ALL AVAILABLE CONTINGENCIES AS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT Page 2 - Council Minutes February 10, 2009 /F-~ DRAFT CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) 5. B. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-031, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING AN INTERPROJECT TRANSFER FROM EXISTING 'SEWER REHABILITATION FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA (SW-255)' PROJECT, TO 'SEA VALE STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (SW-244)' PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $230,836 TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT On January 7, 2009, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the Sea Vale Street Sewer Improvement project which involves the removal and replacement of approximately 830 feet of 8-inch vitrified clay pipe with 8-inch polyvinyl chloride sewer pipe, existing sewer lateral connections, existing sewer manholes and relining of thirteen proposed sewer manholes. (Public Works Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolutions. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-032, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 RECREATION AND NATURE CENTER DEPARTMENT BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $19,500 IN UNANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES TO COMPLETE NATURE CENTER ACCESS ROAD REPAIRS FUNDED BY THE UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service has awarded a contract to the City of Chula Vista to complete some repairs on the Nature Center access road. The funding for the project ($19,500) is available on a reimbursable basis once the project has been completed. Adoption of the resolution appropriates the required funding on the expenditure side, allowing the City to complete the work, and also appropriates an equal amount on the revenue side to be recognized through the reimbursement when the project is complete resulting in no cost to the City. (Recreation and Nature Center Director/Public Works Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. ACTION: Deputy Mayor McCann moved to approve staffs recommendations and offered Consent Calendar Items 1-6, headings read, text. waived. Councilmember Bensoussan seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR There were none. Page 3 - Council Minutes /r'- 3 February 10, 2009 DRAFT PUBLIC COMMENTS Dolores Cabrera, Chula Vista resident, stated that San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) was unwilling to connect the electricity to her new property, located at 725 Main Street, due to broken electrical conduit pipe located under Main Street. She asked the Council to intervene and demand that electricity be provided to her property. Mayor Cox referred the matter to staff. Mike Spethrnan, Chula Vista resident, spoke about the recent tragic loss of a student who was struck by a vehicle on East H Street and fatally injured. He stated that the street was very dangerous, and that this was not the first fatality in the area. He requested that Council direct staff to conduct an analysis of East H Street, and suggested placement of a fence or guard rail, similar to what exists near Bonita Vista High School, at Otay Lakes Road and Bonita Road. Mayor Cox referred the matter to staff. Willard Howard, Chula Vista resident, concurred with the comments made by Mr. Spethman. He also stated that regarding a recent $170,000 legal settlement by the Council to a former City employee who was dismissed by the Council, the Council needed to stand by its decision, rather than to appease because of the threat of a lawsuit. He also encouraged the Council to corne up with funding to avoid a proposed sales tax increase. The following members of the public spoke in support of retaining the Library's STRECH and DASH programs: Veronica Fernlund, Chula Vista resident Estella Fernlund, Chula Vista resident Araceli Lopez, Chula Vista resident Jackie Elbel, Chula Vista resident Barbara Ramirez, Chula Vista resident Guillermo Lopez, Chula Vista resident, representing Chula Vista Neighborhood Watch, asked the Mayor to submit a letter to support the findings by California Energy Commission representative, James Boyd, indicating that the proposed location of the MMC peaker power plant was a mistake. He submitted a document to the Council, illustrating his measurements of the proximity of school facilities and residences to the peaker power plant. PUBLIC HEARING 7. CONSIDERATION FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CHULA VISTA AUTO PARK BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT On January 20, 2009, the Chula Vista City Council adopted a resolution of intent to establish the Chula Vista Auto Park Business Improvement District. The formation of the district will provide a self-funding mechanism to allow for the promotion and marketing of the automobile dealers within the auto park. (Deputy City Manager/Development Services Director) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and at the time specified in the notice. Page 4 - Council Minutes /F-I/ February 10, 2009 DRAFT PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) Principal Economic Development Specialist Ruiz gave a presentation on the Chula Vista Auto Park Business Improvement District. He then read for the record, the following proposed corrections to the proposed ordinance: Section 5.05.060 - Summary of Assessments The total assessment collected from any business under the provisions of the ordinance shall not exceed $6,000.00 per year month. Section 5.05.070 - Eligible Businesses Each new transportation sales business license holder, as defined by the NAIC code numbers in this section, within the confines of one common lot is considered one separate entity for assessment purposes, including those situations when a single person or a corporation owns multiple new vehicle dealerships. For example, if one entity has two or more dealerships on site and has a separate business license for each dealership, that entity would be assessed on each business license issued. If. on the other hand, an entity has multiple dealerships onsite and only has one business license for all of the dealerships, then that entity would be assessed on only one business license. Staffinember Ruiz stated that staff had received comments from three of the five dealerships regarding Section 5.05.040 (Services and Programs) of the proposed ordinance, with the request to withdraw Item C, Employee Parking Shuttle. Staffinember Ruiz stated that staff would support the request to withdraw Item C. Mayor Cox opened the Public Hearing. There being no members of the public who wished to speak, Mayor Cox then closed the Public Hearing. ACTION: Deputy Mayor McCann moved to place the following ordinance on first reading as amended, to reflect the changes for Sections 5.05.040, 5.05.060, and 5.05.070, headings read, text waived: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING CHAPTER 5.05 TO THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING THE CHULA VISTA AUTO PARK BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA LAW OF 1989 AND LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT AND CHARGE THEREIN FOR UPGRADING AND PROMOTING THE AREA (FIRST READING) Mayor Cox seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS 8. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS City Manager Sandoval recommended that the Council meeting of February 17, 2009 be cancelled, due to a light agenda. Discussion ensued among the Council about the possible meeting cancellation. Page 5 ~ Council Minutes /r..-5" February 10, 2009 DRAFT OTHER BUSINESS (Continued) ACTION: Deputy Mayor McCann moved to hold the Regular Council meeting on February 17, 2009, and to cancel the regularly scheduled Council Meeting of February 24, 2009. Councilmember Castaneda seconded the motion and it carried 3-2, with Mayor Cox and Councilmember Ramirez opposed. 9. MA YOR'S REPORTS Mayor Cox announced that the City was recently congratulated by the Arbor Day Foundation, for achieving 'Tree City USA' status. She also informed the public that the Department of Motor Vehicles would be closed for business the first and third Friday of every month. She stated she and Councilmember Bensoussan had attended a recent meeting of the Friends of the Chula Vista Nature Center, and that a task force meeting was scheduled to discuss the creation of a sustainability plan for the Nature Center, with the intent to bring back an interim report on the plan to the Council at the end of February.. She announced the recent opening of Ricco's Salon on Third A venue and wished them well. 10. COUNCILMEMBERS' COMMENTS Deputy Mayor McCann congratulated the Chamber of Commerce on its recent installation dinner. He thanked outgoing Chamber President Lourdes Valdez for her service, and he welcomed new Chamber President Chris Boyd. He spoke of the need for revitalization and economic development in the City. He spoke about the recent Technology Subcommittee meeting, which focused on a technology master plan for the City to include E-government initiatives, and to provide public facilities with up to date technology. Councilmember Castaneda announced that the second Energy Subcommittee Meeting was scheduled for February 18, 2009, at 1 :00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, to further discuss the pending water permits for the South Bay Power Plant. He invited the public to attend the meeting. Councilmember Ramirez announced a meeting of the Animal Care Subcommittee on February 11, 2009, at 4:00 p.m., in the City Hall Executive Conference Room, to discuss issues and activities of the animal care facility. He invited the public to participate in the meeting. Councilmember Bensoussan announced that the City was still receiving donations of items such as newspapers and bedding for the Animal Shelters' "Angels for Animals" donation drive, and that a drop off receptacle for the goods was located in the City Hall lobby. She congratulated the Friends of the Nature Center for increased attendance and revenue. She stated that progress was being made to move forward with a sustainability plan for the Nature Center. Mayor Cox recessed the meeting to convene in Closed Session at 6:57 p.m. Page 6 - Council Minutes IF-I:> February 10, 2009 DRAFT CLOSED SESSION 11. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(b) Two Cases This item was not discussed and no action was taken. 12. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: Jim Sandoval, Scott Tulloch, Marcia Raskin, Bart Miesfeld, Rod Betts, Maria Kachadoorian, Leah Browder . Employee organizations: CVEA, IAFF, POA, WCE, Mid-Management, Professional and Unrepresented Groups No reportable action was taken on this item. ADJOURNMENT At 8:40 p.m., Mayor Cox adjourned the meeting to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on February 19,2009 at 6:00 p.m. in the Executive Conference Room, and thence to the Regular Meeting on February 17, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. L":."'::- . - ----- ____.-=7 ...",,-.. , -----' Lorraine Bennett, CMC, Deputy City Clerk Page 7 - Council Minutes Ir~? February 10, 2009 r~--- From: Greg Alabado [mailto:GregAlabado@cox.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 20091:14 PM To: Stacey Kurz; Margie Reese; Armida Martin del Campo; Aurora Cudal (E-mail); Dina Chavez; Earl Jentz (E-mail); Mark Minas; Mauricio Torre Cc: Mandy Mills Subject: Re: HAC Special Meeting June 17th CANCELLED I wish to let everyone know that in my present condition it is virtually impossible for me to come to any meetings, therefore, please allow me to tender my resignation from HAC or let me know how I can do this online or by mail. Thanks for all your support. Greg ~ o?'\\O~ ORDINA1'iCE NO. Go f>..~\) f>..'V f>..\)\~ .A..L'i ORDINA.NCE OF THE C%~\(j)F~CHULA VISTA AIvIEf.<TIING SECTION 2!~fe20 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TIME fu'ill PLACE OF COUNCIL MEETINGS \VHEREAS, Section 306 of the Chula Vista City Charter requires the City Council to hold regular meetings at least once each month at such. times as it shall fL'{ by ordinance or resolution; and WrIEREAS, Chapter 2.04.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code establishes the time and place of Chula Vista City Council meetings; and WHEREAS, the current ordinance sets the time for City Council meetings on the first Tuesday of each month at four p.m., and on t\je second, third, and fourth Tuesday of each month at six p.m.; and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend Chapter 2.04.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code to set the time for all regular City Council meetings at four p.m.; and WHEREAS, after preliminary review the City COUllcil hereby finds and declares that pursuant to the State of California Environmental Quality Act CCEQA") Guidelines, Tltle 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Article 20, SectionI5378(b)(5), the proposed activity is not a "Project" because it involves only a change in City Council meeting times and therefore is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result In a direct or indirect physical change In the environment; therefore, the City Council hereby further finds and declares that pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15060(c)(3), the proposed acti,ity is not subject to CEQA. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, the Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby amend Section 2.04.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code relating to time and place of Council meetings: SECTION 1: Section 2.04.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.04.020 Meetings-Time and place. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 306 of the Charter, the council shall hold regular meetings in the council chambers of the Civic Center Complex, 276 Fourth A venue in the city, or In such other place as may be determined by the council, on the first, second, third, and fourth Tuesday of each month at four pm. \Vhen the day for any 3-1 regular meeting of the council falls on a legal holiday, no meeting shall be held on such holiday. [t shall be the general policy of the city council to cancel any meetings in the last week of June and the first week of July, the Tuesday follov.ing the Thanksgiving holiday, the week follov.ing Easter, the Tuesday follov.ing Labor Day, and the week of Christmas and New Year's. Any of these meetings may be reinstituted if necessary by a majority of the counciL SECTION 2: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by James D. Sandoval City Manager 3-2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~(~ C1lYOF . --- (HUlA VISTA 6/09/09, Item~ ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING ADDITIONAL FUl'mS TO THE "OT A Y LAKES ROAD WIDENING [MPROVEMENTS FROM CAN 'YON ORNE TO TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD / LA MED[A (STM-355)" PROJECT FROM THE AVAILABLE TRAl"lSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUNDS BALANCE DIRECTOR OF P CITY MAN ASSISTANT CIT 7J SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES [g] NO 0 SUMMARY [n Fiscal Year 2004/2005, City Council approved the appropriation of $900,000 to begiri the preliminary design and investigation work for the Otay Lakes Road (OLR) Widening from Canyon Drive to Telegraph Canyon Road to ease traffic congestion and to assure that the City's GMOC thresholds continue to be satisfied. Further traffic studies by staff revealed the need to also construct improvements on East H, between the Southwestern College and Bonita Vista High School entrances to achieve the stated project objectives. With the additional scope and the complexity of this project with regard to right-of-way acquisition and utility coordination, additional funds are required to continue the critical design, right-of-way acquisition, and environmental stages of the project, as well as develop phased constmction plans. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the proposed action is not a "Project" as defined under Section [5378 (b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines because the proposed action seeks only to appropriate funds to an investigative process that seeks to define the scope of street improvements related to mitigatIOn measures cited by previously certified environmental impact reports. Once the scope of street improvements is defined the appropriate environmental determination will be made. Therefore, pursuant to Section [5060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary at this time. RECOMMENDA nON Council approve the resolution. 4-1 6/09/09, Item~ Page 2 of 3 BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDA nON Not applicable. DISCUSSION At the time this project was first proposed, its scope was limited to completing the widening of OLR to six-lane major standards between Canyon Drive to Telegraph Canyon Road. As this segment of OLR is included in the Transportation Development Impact Fund (TDIF) program, staff performed additional traffic studies of the project area and all intersections to determine the best use of limited TDIF funds and to develop a construction-phasing plan. The traffic studies included safety considerations and vehicle volume data for pre-SRl25 and post-SRl25 conditions, as well as Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) Runs to determine segment average speed and travel time. These studies determined that the area of highest priority is the intersection ofOLR and East H Street. Therefore, Construction Phase I of this project will involve constmcting the intersection and approach legs of OLR and East H Street to their ultimate configurations, including the reduction of crosswalk lengths and the installation of additional, highly-visible signage. The shldies also determined that the current configurations of the entrances to Southwestern College along OLR contribute significantly to overall traffic congestion within the project area. Therefore, Construction Phase 2 of this project would improve the college entrances along Otay Lakes Road. Finally, Construction Phase 3 would be comprised of the addition of the third lane in each direction from the college to the intersection ofOLR and Telegraph Canyon Road. Tentatively, each phase of constmction is anticipated to occur on the following schedule, but is dependent upon the availability ofTDIF funds: Construction Phase I Spring 2010 Construction Phase 2 * Spring 2012 Construction Phase 3 * Spring 2014 * Phases 2 & 3 may be built as a single project if adequate funding is available Right-of-way acquisition is also a significant and complex task on this project. The required acquisition is as follows: I PROPERTY Bonita Vista High School, Unified School District, APN 594-130-45 258 Sq. Ft. Bonita Vista High School Unified School District, APN 594-130-38 539 Sq. Ft. Southwestern College, APN 642-020-28 25,178 Sq. Ft. Church of Latter Day Saints, APN 642-020-19 1,777 Sq. Ft. Southwestern College, Old Fire Station, APN 642-180-01 28 Sq. Ft. College Plaza - Retail Center, APN 642-170-10 6,080 Sq. Ft. US Department of Defense, Navy Housing,APN 642-030-14 1,191 Sq. Ft. Southwestern College, APN 642-020-28 45,671 Sq. Ft. SIZE 0' ACQUISITION 4-2 6/09/09, Iteml Page 3 of 3 US Department of Defense, Navy Housing, APN 642-030-14 5,624 Sq. Ft. US Department of Defense, Navy Housing, APN 642-422-09 587 Sq. Ft. Charter Point Homeowner's Association, APN 642-370-88 908 Sq. Ft. Each of the property owners has its own land sale procedures, with different levels of complexity. Among the more complex are the Navy, the Church of Latter Day Saints, a shopping center, and a Homeowner's Association (HOA). Along with the common right-of-way issues a typical project would present, this project also includes the obligation that the City obtain new easements for the relocation of San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) facilities within the project limits. In this case, SDG&E has senior rights to the City, which means that the City's franchise agreement does not apply and the City will have to pay for the relocation of SDG&E's existing facilities and new easements. Therefore, due to the increased degree of complexity of this project beyond that originally anticipated in the early project planning stages, it is necessary to appropriate additional TDIF funds in the amount of S500,000 to complete design (primarily along East H Street) and to facilitate right-of-way acquisition, including legal descriptions, appraisals, and negotiations. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found a conflict exists, in that Councilmember McCann has property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. CURRENT FISCAL IMPACT The total project estimate, including all three phases of work, is S12.5 million. The design of the total project is about 85% complete. The budget to date is 5900,000 of Transportation Development Impact funds (TDIF). Staff is requesting an additional a.ppropriation of S500,000 to complete the design and to negotiate utility relocation and easement acquisition, as well as right of way acquisition for the total project. There is no impact to the General Fund, as there are sufficient funds in the TDIF balance for this project. Staff will request funding in the amount of $2.5 million for Construction Phase 1 through the Fiscal Year 2009/2010 CIP Budget Process. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Landscaping maintenance and irrigation costs of $1,500 to $2,500 upon completion of all Construction Phases. A TT ACHMENTS 1 - Phasing plat Prepared by Ro/;Jerto Yano, Sr. Civil Engineer, Public Works Department M:\Engineer\AGENDA\C ASZ009\06-0Z-09\STM355 A113- Appropriating funds rev kpa cl~an 5-22.doc 4-3 ATTACHMENT PHASE 1 PHASE 2 /' \ PHASE 3 \ Q: \SDSKPROJ\STM355-H\Draw\nnal\PRESENTAnON\OTArdwg 06/03/2009 02:44:49 PM POT DRAWN BY: TITLE: CESAR V. MAGBUHA T DA TE: SHEET 6-03-09 OF SHTS. CITY OF CHULA VISTA OT A Y LAKES ROAD WIDENING PROJECT FILE #STM-355 PREPARED BY: CESAR V. MAGBUHAT APPROVED BY: ROBERTO YANO RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO THE "OTA Y LAKES ROAD WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS FROM CANYON DRIVE TO TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD / LA MEDIA (STM-355)" PROJECT FROM THE AVAILABLE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUNDS BALANCE WHEREAS, during Fiscal Year 2004/2005, City Council approved the appropriation of $900,000 to begin the preliminary design and investigation work for the Otay Lakes Road (OLR) Widening from Canyon Drive to the intersection of Telegraph Canyon Road to ease traffic congestion and meet the City's GMOC thresholds; and WHEREAS, with further traffic studies, City staff discovered the need for additional improvements on East H from the Southwestern College entrance to the Bonita Vista High school entrance (Baron Way) to achieve the project objective; and WHEREAS, right-of-way is a formidable task within this project because it requires acquisitions from Bonita Vista High School Unified School District, Southwestern College, Church of Latter Day Saints, College Plaza - Retail Center, US Department of Defense, Navy Housing and Charter Point Homeowner's Association; and WHEREAS, this project has the added issue of San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) easements within the project .limits with prior rights and this means that the City's franchise agreement does not apply and that the City will have to pay for the relocation of SDG&E's existing facilities and new easements; and WHEREAS, the total project estimate, including all three phases of work, IS $12.5 million; and WHEREAS, the design of the total project is about 80% done. The budget to date is $900,000 of Transportation Development Impact funds (TDIF); and WHEREAS, staff is requesting an additional appropriation of $500,000 to complete the design and to initiate negotiations for utility and right-of-way of the total project: and WHEREAS, the project is proposed to be broken into three phases in order to comply with the TDIF cash flow requirements and urgency of improvements; and WHEREAS, there is no impact to the General Fund, as there are sufficient funds in the TDlF balance for this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the appropriation of additional funds to the "Otay Lakes Road 4-5 Widening Improvements from Canyon Drive to Telegraph Canyon Road / La Media (STM-355)" :::::: fu, .wilobl, Tc=port.tioo IJo"lopm,rn hnp,rn F""": :l::b ~/ '7 Lie; / ,.14 -?oy(/ // VV' '/ .,./_._. art Miesfeld City Attorney Richard.A. Hopkins Director of Public Works 4-6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~\{t.- CITY OF ~ - (HULA VISTA JUNE 9, 2009, Item~ ITEM TITLE: TIfYESTMENT REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 DIRECTOROFFmf!C /TREASVRER~ CITY MANAGER ASSISTAl"JT CITY' ANAGER <7 '/ SUBi\UTTED BY: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES D NO ~ SUlVIMARY Transmitted herewith is the City's investment report for the quarter ended March 3 1,2009. To meet the reporting requirements set forth in the California Government Code Sections 53600 el seq. and the City of Chula Vista Investment Policy, a separate report was distributed to the City Council as an informational item. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 (b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section l5060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Council accept the report. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION The total cash and investment portfolio as of March 31, 2009 was $186,001,303. This is a decrease of approximately $2,804,205 from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009. For the quarter ended March 31,2009, the earned interest yield was 2.747%, a decrease from the 3.404% reported for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, reflecting reinvestment in a lower interest rate environment and of maturing securities purchased in periods of higher interest rates. The weighted average maturity as of March 31, 2009 was 2.11 years which was the same as last 5-1 JUNE 9, 2009, Ite~ Page 2 of2 quarter. The weighted average maturity remains sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated. DECISION iVIAKER CONFLICT Staff has determined that the action contemplated by this item is ministerial, secretarial, manual, or clerical in nature and, as such, does not require the City Council members to make or participate in making a governmental decision, pursuant to California Code of Regulations section I 8702.4(a). Consequently, this item does not present a conflict under the Political Reform Act (California Government Code S 87100, et seq.). FISCAL IMPACT , Considering the projected timing of cash receipts and disbursements, including the proceeds from the Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note borrowing and the structure of the Pooled Investment Portfolio, the City should be able to comfortably meet overall cash flow needs over the next six months. There is no direct fiscal impact by this action. A TT ACHMENTS A. Investment Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 Prepared by: N. Mandery. Treasury Manager. Finance Dept. 5-2 ~~~ ~ ~~~..:E CITY OF CHULA VISTA Finance Department Investment Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 June 9, 2009 Honorable Mayor and City Council I am pleased to present this report of investment activity for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 in compliance with the reporting requirements as set forth in the California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq. and the City of Chula Vista Investment Policy. The information presented in this report highlights the investment activity for the quarter ended as well as provides a comparison to the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008. Market Overview The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) maintained the key Fed Funds rate at a target range of 0.00% to 0.25% which is the lowest rate on record. It is expected that weak economic conditions will keep this rate low for some time. Weak holiday sales, falling home prices, and increasingly high unemployment rates are all contributing factors. Two-year Treasuries yielding 0.76% at the beginning of the quarter climbed slightly to 0.80% at the end of the quarter as the markets move toward a slow recovery. The Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury have instituted various programs to help stabilize the financial industry such as increasing the FDIC insurance on bank deposits and guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest on certain corporate bonds issued under their Treasury Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). The affects of these programs are just starting to be felt as there are indications that the economy is beginning to stabilize at very low levels. Portfolio Composition The table below provides a summary of the City's total investment portfolio as of March 31,2009. The Investment Portfolio ($179,281,781) CashlTime Deposits ($6,719,522) and Bank Trustee/Fiduciary Funds ($151,973,881) continue to be invested in accordance with the Government Code, bond covenants and the Council Investment Policy as adopted on February 17, 2009. 5-3 Honorable Mayor and City Council Investment Report Quarter ended 3/31/2009 Page 2 of5 Summary of Cash and Investments as of March 31,2009 %of Investment Type Par Value Market Value Book Value Portfolio Investment Portfolio Federal Securities 120,000,000 120,443,537 119,975,200 34.81% Pooled Investments 55,281,781 55,445,359 55,281,781 16.04% Camorate Bonds 4,000,000 4,072,200 3,992,960 1.16% Subtotal 179,281,781 179,961,096 179,249,941 50.85% Cash/Time Deposits $6,719,522 $6,719,522 $6,719,522 1,95% Total Cash & Investments Held by the City $186,001,303 $186,680,618 $185,969,463 53.96% Held by Bank Trustee/Fiduciary Funds (1) U. S. Government 56,418,464 66,844,183 56,418,464 16.37% Investment Agreements 25,868,339 25,868,339 25,868,339 7.51% Mutual Funds 55,645,569 55,645,569 55,645,569 16.14% Cash with Fiscal Agents 0 0 0 0.00% Restricted Cash 14,041,510 14,041,510' 14,041,510 4.07% Total Held by Bank Trustee/Fiduciary Funds $151,973,881 $162,399,600 $151,973,881 44.09% Total Portfolio $344,694,706 $355,799,740 $344,662,866 100.00% (1) Reflects bond proceeds held by trustee in accordance with bond covenants. The graph below provides a snapshot of the portfolio composition by investment type for that portion of the portfolio not held by the bank trustee or in a fiduciary fund, Portfolio Composition as of March 31,2009 US Government Agency 66.93% Corporate Coupon Bonds 2.23% ~ LAlF (State Pool) 30.28% Portfolio Performance Portfolio performance is provided in more detail in the attachments to the report. The summary information provided below includes the total portfolio income recognized for the last quarter as compared to the prior quarter and the same quarter one year ago. 5-4 Honorable Mayor and City Council Investment Report Quarter ended 3/31/2009 Page 3 of 5 Total Portfolio Income Recognized Accrual Basis Total Portfolio March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 March 31, 2008 Quarter-End Net Interest Earnings Net Gains (Losses) from Sales Net Total Income Recognized $ 1,361,958 $ 1,637,055 $ 2,137,009 $ 24,938 $ $ (77,130) $ 1,386,896 $ 1,637,055 $ 2,059,879 $ 4,839,146 $ 3,477,188 $ 6,676,247 . $ 24,938 $ $ 246,723 $ 4,864,084 $ 3,477,188 $ 6,922,970 Fiscal Year-ta-Date Net Interest Earnings Net Gains (Losses) from Sales Net Total Income Recognized This info comes from the monthly Sympro "Interest Earnings Summary" reports. Benchmark Comoarison The following graph compares the monthly earned interest yield of the City's Portfolio Fund with the monthly average yields for the same period of the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the two-year and three-year treasury from March 2007 through March 2009. Monthly Benchmark Comparison 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dee-07 Mar-OB Jun-08 Sep-08 I-+-City ---m--LAIF --'-ZyrTreasury -....a-3yrTreasury I b-b Dee-08 Mar-09 Honorable Mayor and City Council Investment Report Quarter ended 3/31/2009 Page 4 of 5 Per Section 16.1 of the City's Investment Policy, the two-year U.S. Treasury and the Local Agency Investment Fund yields are the performance benchmarks to be used when determining whether market yields are being achieved. The three-year U.S. Treasury is added as an additional point of reference in order to provide an upper range that is above the weighted average maturity of the City's portfolio, which is at 770 days. ;~lL4il%~~~:~f/lf~%'~~;~~,P,i~;1~~Yrera'i~~~i?;3~;f!AD M;;~ City 2.75% 770 LAIF 1 .82% 197 2 Year Treasury 0.80% 730 3 Year Treasury 1 .1 5% 1 ,095 ADM - Averaqe Davs to Maturitv Investment Activitv During the quarter, sixteen investments totaling $57,000,000 maturedlexpired or were redeemed. These monies represent pooled cash received from various funding sources such as sewer, RDA, TDIF, PAD, General Fund, etc. The majority of these funds were reinvested through the purchase of seventeen Federal Agency Securities and one Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP) Corporate bond totaling $62,000,000 using the City's Investment Policy guideline to ensure safety, liquidity and yield. Although staff has been reluctant to purchase corporate bonds due to the uncertainties of the market, the purchase of this corporate bond is through the TLGP, which is a federally guaranteed program that offers the safety of a treasury note but with a higher yield. This type of investment also allows for more diversification within the portfolio. There is no further activity to report on other than routine investments in money market mutual funds by the City's fiscal-agents. Conclusion The total cash and investment portfolio as of March 31, 2009 was $186,001,303. This is a decrease of approximately $2,804,205 from December 31,2008 to March 31,2009. For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the earned interest yield was 2.747%, a decrease from the 3.404% reported for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, reflecting reinvestment in a lower interest rate environment and of maturing securities purchased in periods of higher interest rates. The weighted average maturity as of March 31, 2009 was 2.11 years which was the same as the prior quarter. The weighted average maturity remains sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements that might be reasonably anticipated. . . Considering the projected timing of cash receipts and disbursements, including the proceeds from the Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note borrowing and the structure of the Pooled Investment Portfolio, the City should be able to comfortably meet overall cash flow needs over the next six months. There is no direct fiscal impact by this action. 5-6 Honorable Mayor and City Council Investment Report Quarter ended 3/31/2009 Page 5 of 5 I certify that this report reflects the City of Chula Vista and related agencies pooled investments and is in conformity with the State of California Government Code on authorized investments and with the Investment Policy of the City of Chula Vista as stated in Resolution No. 2008-54 dated February 17, 2009. Respectfully submitted, JnCLc- ~~ Maria Kachadoorian Director of FinancefTreasurer 5-7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~ CITY OF -='" (HUlA VISTA JUNE 9, 2009, Item~ ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO A FOUR PARTY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA; HELIX ENVIRON 'MENTAL PLANNING, INC., CONSULTANT; AND MCMILLIN OTAY RANCH, LLC AND OTAY PROJECT, LP, APPLICANTS, FOR CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED TO CONDUCTING ADDITIONAL MITIGATION MONITORING SERVICES FOR OLYMPIC PARKWAY BETWEEN BRANDYWINE AVENUE AND SR-l25. SUBMITTED BY: DEPUTY CITY / DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SE REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGE 4/5THS VOTE: YES D NO ~ SUMMARY The item before the City Council is a request to approve a first amendment to the four party agreement with Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., for consulting services related to conducting additional mitigation monitoring services for Olympic Parkway between Brandywine Avenue and SR-l25 (hereinafter referred to as the Project) for an amount not to exceed $27,345. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION That the City Council adopt the resolution. BOARDS/COl\'IMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable 6-1 JUNE 9, 2009, Item~ Page 2 of 3 DISCUSSION Background On April 13, 1999, the City Council certified Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. IS-99-20 for the Olympic Parkway Extension. In accordance with CEQA, MND No. IS- 99-20 includes a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). Because City staff did not possess technical expertise to perform all monitoring tasks, staff recommended that a consultant be retained to assist in the final implementation of the MMRP. The consultant would function as the Environmental Monitor Specialist (Biologist) for the City, and would conduct mitigation monitoring and reporting activities associated with created native wetland and upland habitat, with the primary tasks consisting of post-construction monitoring and reporting activities. City staff in the Environmental Planning Section would supervise the mitigation monitoring tasks in the adopted MMRP for Olympic Parkway between Brandywine Avenue and SR-125. On August 13, 2002, the City Council, upon staffs recommendation, waived the City's formal bidding process and approved a four party agreement between the City of Chu1a Vista; Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., Consultant; and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC and Otay Project, LP, Applicants, to conduct mitigation monitoring services for Olympic Parkway between Brandywine Avenue and SR-125. In accordance with procedures set forth in the City's Environmental Review Procedures, the City's Environmental Review Coordinator negotiated the details of the four party agreement, with Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. to provide mitigation monitoring services in an amount not to exceed $97,400. Scope of Work During the mitigation monitoring process, it became necessary for Helix to perform out of scope work items in regards to: 1) maintenance and annual technical monitoring; 2) aquatic habitat success monitoring; and 3) project management and coordination for project sign-off. These tasks are described below. Maintenance and Annual Technical Monitoring - At the City's request, and with the concurrence of McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC and Otay Project, LP, Helix conducted out of scope work, including additional maintenance monitoring, attendance of additional field and office meetings, and preparation of additional memos and other correspondence related to the execution of the mitigation effort. Aquatic Habitat Success Monitoring - To prepare the aquatic sampling protocol, Helix conducted extensive coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board), including out-of-scope field meetings and correspondence involving several revisions to the protocol. In the final approved protocol, the Regional Board required more sample locations than had been proposed in the original scope of work. In addition, as a result of the analyses required by the Regional Board, the cost of analyzing each aquatic sample was higher than had originally been estimated. 6-2 JUNE 9, 2009, Item fa Page 3 of3 Project Management and Coordination for Project Sign-off - At the direction of City staff, Helix spent additional biologist time for management and meetings to assist with project sign-off. With prior authorization by City, Helix may perform additional duties, including but not limited to, attending meetings and preparing correspondence, to assist with project sign- off. The cost of such duties shall not exceed $5,000. To compensate for completed and future out-of-scope tasks, the First Amendment adds $27,345 to the amount of the four party agreement ($97,400), bringing the total to $124,745. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property that is subject tot his action. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMP ACT There would be no impact to the General Fund. The project applicants, McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC and Otay Project, LP, through a deposit account, will pay Helix's consulting fees. The contract amount for consulting services is $27,345. Twenty-five percent is the responsibility of McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC and seventy-five percent is the responsibility of Otay Project, LP. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The ongoing fiscal impact would be the same as the current year fiscal impact, noted above. ATTACHMENTS 1. First Amendment 2. Original Four Party Agreement Prepared by: Kimberly Vunder Bie, Associate Planner, Development Services J'IPlanninglKlMl0lympic Parkway ChannellCantract AugmentlAgenda StatementI6.9. 09 Agenda Statement. 6. doc 6-3 FlRST AL"IENDMENT To the Four Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista; HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc., Consultant; and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC and Otay Project, LP, Applicants, To Provide Additional Biological Consulting Services For the Olympic Parkway (Poggi Canyon) Channel Restoration Project Recitals This First Amendment is effective as of June 9, 2009 by and between the City of Chula Vista ("City"); HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc., ("Consultant"); and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC and Otay Project, LP ("Applicants'), with reference to the following facts: WHEREAS, City, Consultant and Applicants previously entered into an agreement on August 13, 2002, whereby Consultant was to provide biological consulting services for the Olympic Parkway (Poggi Canyon) Channel Restoration Project ("Project"); and WHEREAS, at City's request, Consultant performed additional work necessitated by the complexity of the Project (including continued issues with erosion control, new non-project related impacts to the project area, and agency requirements for Project sign off), resulting in Consultant exceeding the amount of the original contract; and WHEREAS, City assumes potential additional biologist time to assist with Project sign-off, as detailed in this First Amendment; and WHEREAS, additional mitigation monitoring services shall not exceed $27,345. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and the mutual obligation of the parties set forth herein, City, Consultant and Applicants agree as follows: 1. Exhibit A, Section 5, entitled Detailed Scope of Work ("Detailed Services"), is hereby amended to add the following provisions: k. At the direction of City staff, HELIX provided additional maintenance monitoring, attended additional field and office meetings, and prepared additional memos and other correspondence related to the execution of the mitigation effort. 1. To prepare the aquatic sampling protocol, (see "i" in the Four Party Agreement) HELIX conducted extensive coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board), including out-of-scope field meetings and correspondence involving several revisions to the protocol. In the final approved protocol, the Regional Board required more sample locations than had been proposed in the original scope of work. In addition, as a result of the analyses required by the Regional Board, the cost of analyzing each aquatic sample was higher than had originally been estimated. m. At the direction of City staff, HELIX spent additional biologist time for management and meetings to assist with project sign-off. 6-4 ll. With prior authorization by City, HELIX may perform additional duties, including but not limited to, attending meetings and preparing correspondence, to assist with Project sign-off. The cost of such duties shall not exceed 55,000. 2. Exhibit C, Section entitled, "Time and Materials," is amended as follows: In the second paragraph, the amount of "$97,400" is replaced with "$124,745." 3. Except as herein provided, all other provisions of the original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 6-5 SIGNATURE PAGE To the Four Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista; HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc., Consultant; and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC and Otay Project, LP, Applicants, To Provide Additional Biological Consulting Services For the Olympic Parkway (Poggi Canyon) Channel Restoration Project IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City, Consultant and Applicants have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement, thereby indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms: City of Chula Vista Consultant: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. Cheryl Cox, Mayor By: By: Dated: Attes t: By: Donna Norris, City Clerk Approved as to form: By: Bart Miesfield, City Attorney Dated: 6-6 Applicants: McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Delaware limited liP By: ... u/ /(/7 . ~, Denny Cuccarese, Vice President Dated: &(~/o9 6-7 OTA Y PROJECT, LP, a California limited partnership BY: ORIOLE MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California limited liability company, its General Partner ~6- Bnan Canaris, Secretary Dated: ~ 12-1 oC) By: 6-8 Four Party Agreement Between City of Chula Vista, Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., Consultant" and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC and Otay Project, LP, Applicants, For Consulting Work to be Rendered with regard to Applicant's Project 1. Parties. This Agreement is made as of the reference date set forth in Exhibit A, for the purposes of reference only', and effective as of the date last executed by the parties hereto, between the City of Chula Vista ("City") herein, a municipal corporation of the State of California, the person designated on the attached Exhibit A as "Consultant", Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., whose business form and address is indicated on the attached Exhibit A, and the persons designated on the attached Exhibit A to be collectively referred to herein as "Applicant", McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Otay Project, LP, a California limited partnership, whose business form and address is indicated on the attached Exhibit A, and is made with reference to the following facts: 2. Recitals, Warranties and Representations. 2.1. Warranty of Ownership. Applicant warrants that Applicant lS the owner of land ("Property") commonly known as, or generally located as, described on Exhibit A, Paragraph 1, or has an option or other entitlement to develop said Property. 2.2. Applicant desires to develop the Property with the Project described on Exhibit A, Paragraph 2, and in that regard, has made application ("Application") with the City for approval of the plan, map, zone, or other permits ("Entitlements") described on Exhibit A, Paragraph 3. 2.3. Applicant, Exhibit A, In order for the City to process the Application of Work of the general nature and type described in Paragraph 4, ("Work") will need to be completed. 2.4. City does not presently have the to process the application within for review by the Applicant. 1Tinhousel! staff or the time frame resources requested Four Party Agreement 08/06/2002 Page 1 6-9 2C02 -215 2.5. This agreement proposes an arrangement by which Applicant shall retain, and be liable for the costs of retaining, Consultant, who shall perform the services required of Consultant by this Agreement solely to, and under the direction of, the City. 2.6. Additional facts and circumstances regarding the background for this agreement are set forth on Exhibit B; 3. Aqreement. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED TO AND BETWEEN THE CITY, CONSULTANT, AND APPLICANT AS FOLLOWS: 3.1. Employment of Consultant by ApDlicant. Consultant is hereby engaged by the Applicant, not the City, and at Applicant's sole cost and expense, to perform to, and for the primary benefit of, City, and solely at City's direction, all of the services described on the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 4, entitled "General Nature of Consulting Services", ("General Services"), and in the process of performing and delivering said General Services, Consultant shall also perform to and for the benefit of City all of the services described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 5, entitled "Detailed Scope of Work", ("Detailed Services"), and all services reasonable necessary to accomplish said General Services and Detailed Scope of Work, and shall deliver such documents required ("Deliverables") herein, all within the time frames herein set forth, and in particular as set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 6, and if none are set forth, within a reasonable period of time for the diligent execution of Consultant's duties hereunder. Time is of the essence of this covenant. The Consultant does hereby agree to perform said General and Detailed Services to and for the primary benefit of the City for the compensation herein fixed to be paid by Applicant. In delivering the General and Detailed Services hereunder, the Consultant shall do so in a good, professional manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations, at its own cost and expense except for the compensation and/or reimbursement, if any, herein promised, and shall furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, machinery, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities, calculations, and all other means whatsoever, except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by the Cicy or Applicant, necessary or 08/06/2002 ?our Party Agreement Page 2 6-10 proper to perform and complete the work and provide the Services required of the Consultant. 3.2. Compensation of Consultant. Applicant shall compensate Consultant for all services rendered by Consultant without regard to the conclusions reached by the Consultant, and according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit C adjacent to the governing compensation relationship indicated by a "checkmark" next to the appropriate arrangement, by paying said amount to the City, within 15 days of Applicant's billing, or in accordance with the security deposit provisions of Paragraph 3.3 and Exhibit C, if checked, and upon receipt of such payment by the City, City shall promptly, not later than 15 days, or in accordance with the Bill Processing procedure in Exhibit C, if checked, pay said amount to the Consultant. City is merely acting in the capacity as a conduit for payment, and shall not be liable for the compensation unless it receives same from Applicant. Applicant shall not make any payments of compensation or otherwise directly to the Consultant. 3.2.1. Additional Work. If the Applicant, with the concurrence of City, determines that additional services ("Additional Services") are needed from Consultant of the type Consultant is qualified to render or reasonably related to the Services Consultant is otherwise required to provide by this Agreement, the Consultant agrees to provide such additional services on a time and materials basis paid for by Applicant at the rates set forth in Exhibit C, unless a separate fixed fee is otherwise agreed upon in writing for said Additional Work between the parties. 3.2.1.1. In the even~ that the City shall determine that additional work is required to be performed above and beyond the scope of work herein provided, City will consult with Applicant regarding the additional work, and if thereupon the Applicant fails or refuses to arrange and pay for said Additional Services, the City may, at its option, suspend any further processing of Applicant's Application until the Applicant shall deposit the City's estimate of the costs of the additional work which the City determines is or may be required. Applicant shall pay any and all additional costs for the additional work. 3.2.2. Reductions in Scope of Work. City may independently, or upon request from Consultant, from time to time reduce the Services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Consultant agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose 08/06/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 3 6-11 of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation associated with said reduction. Upon failure to agree, the Fixed Fee may be unilaterally reduced by the City by the amount of time and materials budgeted by Consultant for the Services deleted. 3.3. Security for Payment of Compensation by Applicant. 3.3.1. Deposit. As security for the payment of Consultant by Applicant, Applicant shall, upon execution of this Agreement, deposit the amount indicated on Exhibit C as "Deposit Amount" with the City, as trustee for Consultant, the conditions of such trust being as indicated on Exhibit C and as hereinbelow set forth: 3.3.1.1 Other Terms of Deposit Trust. 3.3.1.1.1. City shall also be entitled to retain from said Deposit all costs incurred by City for which it is entitled to compensation by law or under the terms of this agreement. 3.3.1.1.2. All interest earned on the Deposit Amount, if any, shall accrue to the benefit of, and be used for, Trust purposes. City may, in lieu of deposit into a separate bank account, separately account for said deposit in one or more of its various bank accounts, and upon doing so, shall proportionately distribute to the Deposit Trust, the average interest earned during the period on its general fund. 3.3.1.1.3. Any unused balance of Deposit Amount, including any unused interest earned, shall be returned to Applicant not later than 30 days after the termination of this Agreement and any claims resulting therefrom. 3.3.1.1.4. within 30 days after of the use Nothing herein shall invalidate herein authorized. Applicant shall be notified of the Deposit in any manner. use of the Deposit in the manner 3.3.1.1.5. At such time as City shall reasonably determine that inadequate funds remain on Deposit to secure future compensation likely due Consultant or City, City may make demand of Applicant to supplement said Deposit Amount i~ such amount as City shall reasonably specify, and upon doing so, Applicant shall, within 30 days pays said amount ("Supplemental Deposit Amount") to City. Said Supplement Deposit Amount or Amounts shall be governed by the same terms of trust governing the original Deposit. 08/06/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 4 6-12 3.3.2. Withholding of Processing. In addition to use of the Deposit as security, in order to secure the duty of Applicant to pay Consultant for Services rendered under this agreement, City shall be entitled to withhold processing of Applicant's Application upon a breach of Applicant's duty to compensate Consultant. 4. Non-Se~rice Related Duties of Consultant. 4.1. Insurance. Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and subconsultants employed by it in connection with the Services required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss by the following insurance coverages, in the following categor- ies, and to the limits specified, policies of which are issued by Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V" or better, or shall meet with the approval of the City: 4.1.1. Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 10. 4.1.2. Commercial General Liability Insurance including Business Automobile Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 10, cowbined single limit applied separately to each project away from premises owned or rented by Consultant, which names City and Applicant as an Additional Insured, and which is primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("Primary Coverage"), and which treats the employees of the City and Applicant in the same manner as members of the general public ("Cross-liability Coverage"). 4.1.3. Errors and Omissions insurance, in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 10, unless Errors and Omissions coverage is included in the General Liability policy. 4.2. Proof of Insurance Coverage. 4.2.1. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein required, prior to the commencement of services required under this Agreement, by delivery of Certificates of Insurance demonstrating same, and further indicating that the policies may not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the Additional Insured. 4.2.2. Policy Endorsements Required. In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured Coverage, Primary Coverage and 08/06/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 5 6-13 Cross-liability Coverage required under Consultant's Commercial General Liability Insurance, Policy, Consultant shall deliver a policy endorsement to the City and Applicant demonstrating same. 4,3, Public Statements. All public statements and releases to the news media shall be the responsibility of the City and the Applicant. The Consultant shall not publish or release news items, articles or present lectures on the Project, either during the course of the study or after its completion, except on written concurrence of the City and Applicant. 4.4. communication to Applicant. Consultant shall not communicate directly to the Applicant except in the presence of the City, or by writing an exact copy of which is simultaneously provided to City, except with the express consent of City. The -Consultant may request such meetings with the Applicant to ensure the adequacy of services performed by Consultant. 5. Non-Compensation Duties of the Applicant. 5.1. Documents Access. The Applicant shall provide to the Consultant, through the City, for the use by the Consultant and City, such documents, or copies of such documents requested by Applicant, within the possession of Applicant reasonably useful to the Consultant in performing the services herein required of Consultant, including but not limited to those described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 7. 5.2. Property Access. The Applicant hereby grants permission to the City and Consultant to enter and access the Property, to take any borings, make any tests, conduct any surveys or reconnaissance necessary to deliver the Services of Consultant, subject to the approval of the Applicant. Consultant shall promptly repair any damage to the subject property occasioned by such entry and shall indemnify, defend, and hold Applicant harmless from all loss, cost, damage, expenses, claims, and liabilities in connection with or arising from any such entry and access. 5.3. Communication to Consultant. Applicant shall not communicate directly to the Consultant except in the presence of the City, or by writing an exact copy of which is simultaneously provided to City, except with the 08/05/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 6 6-14 express consent of City. The Applicant may request such meetings as they desire with the Consultant to ensure the adequacy of services performed by Consultant. 6. Administrative Representatives. Each party designates the individuals ("Administrators") indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, as said party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to represent them in the routine administration of this agreement. 7. Conflicts of Interest. 7.1. Consultant is Desiqnated as an FPPC Filer. If Consultant is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, as an "FPPC filer", Consultant is deemed to be a "Consultant".for the purposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and disclosure provisions, and shall report his economic interests to the City Clerk on the required Statement of Economic Interests in such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph 9 of Exhibit A, or if none are specified, then as determined by the City Attorney. 7.2. Decline to Participate. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant shall not make, or participate in making or In any way attempt to use Consultant's position to influence a governmental decision in which Consultant knows or has reason to know Consultant has a financial interest other than the compensation promised by this Agreement. 7.3. Search to Determine Economic Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant warrants and represents that Consultant has diligently conducted a search and inventory of Consultant's economlc interests, as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and has determined that Consultant does not, to the best of Consultant's knowledge, have an economic interest which would conflict with Consultant's duties under this agreement. 7.4. Promise Not to Acquire Conflictinq Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will not acquire, obtaint or assume an economic interest during the term of this Agreement which would constitute a conflict of 08(06(2002 Four Party Agreement Page 7 6-15 interest as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act. 7.5. Duty to Advise of Conflictinq Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Consultant learns of an economic interest of Consultant's which may result in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair Political Practices Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder. 7.6. 5Decific Warranties Aqainst Economic Interests. Consultant warrants and represents that neither Consultant, nor Consultant's immediate family members, nor Consultant's employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever in the property which is the subject matter of the Project, or in any property within 10 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of the property which is the subject matter of the Project, or ("Prohibited Interest"). Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment, remuneration! consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant Associates by Applicant or by any other party as a result of Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Consultant promises to advise City of any such promise that may be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter. Consultant agrees that Consultant Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement. Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement, or for any third party which may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement. 8. Default of the Consultant for Breach. This agreement may be terminated by the CITY for default if the Consultant breaches this agreement or if the Consultant refuses or fails to pursue the work under this agreement or any phase of the work with such diligence which would assure its completion within a reasonable period of time. Termination of this agreement because of a default of the Consultant shall not relieve the Consultant from liability of such default. 08/06/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 8 6-16 9. City's Riqht to Terminate Payment for Convenience, Documents. 9.1. Notwithstanding any other section or provision of this agreement, the CITY shall have the absolute right at any time to terminate this agreement or any work to be performed pursuant to this agreement. 9.2. In the event of termination of this agreement by the CITY in the absence of default of the Consultant, the City shall pay the Consultant for the reasonable value of the services actually performed by the Consultant up to the date of such termination, less the aggregate of all sums previously paid to the Consultant for services performed after execution of this agreement and prior to its termination. 9.]. The Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damage or compensation arising under this agreement, except as set forth herein, in the event of such termination. 9.4. In the event of termination of this agreement, and upon demand of the City, the Consultant shall deliver to. the City, all field notes, surveys, studies, reports, plans, drawings and all other materials and documents prepared by the Consultant in performance of this agreement, and all such documents and materials shall be the property of the City; provided however, that the Consultant may retain copies for their own use and the City shall provide a copy, at Applicant's cost, of all such documents to the Applicant. 9.5. and shall work. Applicant shall have no right to "terminate Consultant, not exercise any control or direction over Consultant's 10. Administrative Claims Requirement and Procedures. No suit shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City, unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City of Chula Vista and acted upon by the City of Chula Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.]4 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if set fully set forth herein. 08/06/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 9 6-17 11. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. 11.1. Inluries. Consultant to Indemnify City and Applicant re Consultant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees and Applicant from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the conduct of the Consultant, or any agent or employees, subcontractors, or others of City or Applicant in connection with the execution of the work covered by this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City, its officers, or employees, or Applicant, Consultant's inde~nification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and liability incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees or Applicant in defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to judgment or not. Further, Consultant at its own expense shall, upon written request by the City or Applicant, defend any such suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents, or employees or Applicant. Consultants' indemnification of City and Applicant shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant. 11.2. Applicant to Indemnify City re Compensation of Consultant. Applicant agrees to defend, inde~~ify and hold the City harmless against and from any and all claims, losses, damages, expenses or expenditures of City, including its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, or representatives of the City ("City Indemnitees"), in any way resulting from or arising out of the refusal to pay compensation as demanded by Consultant for the performance of services required by this Agreement. 12. Business Licenses. Applicant agrees to obtain a business license from the City and to otherwise comply with Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 5. Applicant further agrees to require Consultant to obtain such business license and to comply with Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 5. 13. Miscellaneous. 13.1. Consultant not authorized to Represent City. Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, neither Consultant nor Applicant shall have authority to act as City'S 08/06/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 10 6-18 agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever. 13.2. Notices. All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified for the parties in Exhibit A. 13.3. Entitlement to Subsequent Notices. No notice to or demand on the parties for notice of an event not herein legally required to be given shall in itself create the right in the parties to any other or further notice or demand in the same, similar or other circumstances. 13.4. Entire Aqreement. This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought. 13.5. CaDacity of Parties. Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement; that all resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement. 13.6. Governinq Law/Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista. 08/06/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 11 6-19 13.7. Modification. No modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and then shall be valid only in the specific instance and for the purpose for which given. 13.8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in more than one counterpart, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which, when taken together shall constitute but one instrument. i3 .9. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall for any reason, be determined to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith and agree to such amendments, modifications, or supplements to this Agreement or such other appropriate action as shall, to the maximum extent practicable in light of such determination, implement and give effect to the intentions of the parties as reflected herein. Headinqs. 13 .10. The captions and headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not define or limit the provisions hereof. 13 .11. Waiver. No course of dealing or failure or delay, nor the single failure or delay, or the partial exercise of any right, power or privilege, on the part of the parties shall operate as a waiver of any rights herein contained. The making or the acceptance of a payment by either party with knowledge of the existence of a breach shall not operate or be construed to operate as a waiver of any such breach. 13 .12. Remedies. The rights of the parties under this Agreement are cumulative and not exclusive of any rights or remedies which the parties might otherwise have unless this Agreement provides to the contrary. 08/06/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 12 6-20 13.13. No Additional Beneficiaries. Despite the fact that the required performance under this agreement may have an affect upon persons not parties hereto, the parties specifically intend no benefit therefrom, and agree that no performance hereunder may be enforced by any person not a party to this agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this is a three party agreement and the City is an express third party beneficiary of the promises of Consultant to provide services paid for by Applicant. (End or Page. Next Page is Signature Page.) Four Party Agreement 08/06/2002 Page 13 6-21 Signature Page (1 of 3) Four-Party Agreement Between The City Of Chula Vista; Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., Consultant; and Otay Project, LP and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC, Applicants, For Mitigation Monitoring Services to be Rendered for Olympic Parkway Between Brandywine Avenue and SR-125 Now therefore, the parties hereto, having read and understood the terms and conditions of this agreement, do hereby express their consent to the terms hereof by setting their hand hereto on the date set forth adjacent thereto. Dated: City of Chula Vista by: .JA~_!Irr~0;] Mayor , Attest: -~)AX~)~ Susan Bigelow City Clerk Approved as to form: ~r^ c~ Jolin' . aheny City Attorney Consultant: Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. by: . (~ ~~~~ Title: \j v'-. e. \7 ,l2-e<::K) e f\S1 Dated: '/211 ClL- 07/25/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 14 6-22 Signature Page (2 of 3) Four-Party Agreement Between The City Of Chula Vista; Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., Consultant; and Otay Project, LP and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC, Applicants, For Mitigation Monitoring Services to be Rendered for Olympic Parkway Between Brandywine Avenue and SR-125 Dated: 8/11(01- Applicant: McMILLIN OTAY RANCH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: McMILLIN COMPANIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company by: 1:~~~e~ V')~ 1{~ Title: rJ.!t7. by: 07/25/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 15 6-23 Signature Page (3 of 3) Four-Party Agreement Between The City Of Chula Vista; Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., Consultant; and Otay Project, LP' and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC, Applicants, For Mitigation Monitoring Services to be Rendered for Olympic Parkway Between Brandywine Avenue and SR-125 /' I Dated: 71..7/0'7- Applicant: OTAY PROJECT, LP, a California limited partnership By: OTAY RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a California limited liability company by: .f/. by: 07/25/2002 Four Party Agreement Page 16 6-24 Exhibit A Effective Date of Agreement: August 13, 2002 City-Related Entity: (X) City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of the State of California () Redevelopment Agency ofthe City ofChuIa Vista, a political subdivision of the State of California ( ) Industrial Development Authority of the City of Chula Vista, a ( ) Other: form] , a [insert business ("City") Place of Business for City: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Consultant: Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. Business Form of Consultant: ( ) Sole Proprietorship ( ) Partnership (X) Corporation Address: 8100 La Mesa Boulevard, Suite 150, La Mesa, California 91941 Applicant: McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Business Form of Applicant: ( ) Sole Proprietorship ( ) Partnership (X) Corporation Address. 2727 Hoover Avenue, National City, CA 91950 A-I 6-25 Applicant: Otay Project, LP, a California limited partnership Business Form of Applicant: ( ) Sole Proprietorship (X) Partnership ( ) Corporation Address: 350 West Ash Street, Suite 730, San Diego, CA 92101 1. Property (Commonly known address or General Description): The property consists of the manmade Poggi Canyon drainage channel, which runs along Olympic Parkway from approximately the eastern boundary of the Sunbow development (Brandywine Avenue) to planned State Route 125, as well as the upland channel buffer area, located within the master planned community commonly known as Otay Ranch SPA One and SPA One West. Prior to acceptance of the successfully created biological habitats by the City of Chula Vista and the permitting agencies, Otay Project, LP is responsible for the maintenance of the channel segments between Olympic Parkway Station Points 44+00 and 184+25 and between Olympic Parkway Station Points 211 +80 and 245+00, as depicted on the "Landscape Improvement Plans For Poggi Canyon Drainage," Work Order No. ORI57G, Drawing Nos. 00-23-01 through -37, approved by City of Chula Vista on 5/18/00. Prior to acceptance of the successfully created biological habitats by the City of Chula Vista and the permitting agencies, McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC is responsible for the maintenance of the channel segment between Olympic Parkway Station Points 184+25 and 211+80, as depicted on the "Irrigation and Planting Plans For Wetland Mitigation, Olympic Parkway Channel," Work Order No. 0R224G, Drawing Nos. 00-073-01 through -14, approved by City of Chula Vista on 5/18/00. 2. Project Description ("Project"): The Project consists of monitoring and reporting acl1vltles associated with created riparian habitat within the Poggi Canyon drainage channel and created upland habitat within the channel buffer area. 3. Entitlements applied for: N/A A-2 6-26 4. General Nature of Consulting Services ("Services--General"): Environmental Monitor Specialist (Biologist) to conduct monitoring and reporting activities associated with created riparian and upland habitat all to the satisfaction of the City's Environmental Review Coordinator. 5. Detailed Scope of Work ("Detailed Services"): The Consultant will function as the Environmental Monitor Specialist (Biologist) for the City of Chula Vista for the created riparian habitat within the Poggi Canyon drainage channel and upland habitat within the channel buffer area. The Consultant will provide biological technical support to City staff to conduct monitoring and reporting activities. Specific responsibilities of the Consultant with reference to the Poggi Canyon drainage channel project shall consist of the following tasks: a. At the direction of City staff, coordinate with the previous project biologist, Applicant's landscape maintenance contractor and City staff; b. When directed by City staff (prior to commencement of the five-year maintenance monitoring period), conduct an initial walk-through of the site with City staff, Applicant's landscape maintenance contractor, and the previous biologist (if available) to define site boundaries and allow identification of any problem areas that may have developed during the establishment period, the results of which shall be documented by Consultant in a letter report (Deliverable No. I); c. When directed by City staff, conduct a monitoring event at the beginning of the five-year maintenance monitoring period to establish qualitative baseline data for the riparian habitat that will be used for comparison during the following years, the results of which shall be documented by Consultant in a report (Deliverable No.2); , d. When directed by City staff, as set forth in a written notice to proceed, commence maintenance monitoring (to be performed in accordance with Table 1 below, Habitat Maintenance Monitoring Schedule) of both the riparian habitat within the channel and the upland habitat within the channel buffer area (monitored visually from within the riparian habitat) for five years (unless terminated early by City staff in the event that the success criteria are met prior to the completion of five years of maintenance monitoring), consisting of a visual assessment of the restoration areas and identification of problems (i.e., weeds, trash removal, erosion control, irrigation problems, plant failure, and the like) and assessment of the need for corrective measures, including irrigation repairs and plant replacement; e. Document each maintenance monitoring ev.ent in a memo to City staff summarizing the site conditions (Deliverable Nos. 3.1 to 3.29); A-3 6-27 f. 'When directed by City staff, as set forth in a written notice to proceed, commence technical monitoring twice during Year I (six months apart) and annually during Years 2 through 5, consisting of both qualitative and quantitative assessments of the riparian habitat and qualitative assessment only of the upland habitat Technical monitoring of' ') the riparian habitat will consist of quantitative monitoring through thirteen (13) 50-meter line and belt transects (II subject and 2 control), with collection methods following the California Native Plant Society protocol for data collection; . g. Compare collected data to the control transects and determine progress through comparison of data according to the success criteria presented in the Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Plan for the Olympic Parkway Extension (Merkel & Associates, February I, 1999) and the California Department ofFish and Game 1600 Agreement; h. Prepare a report following each technical assessment and submit to City staff for review and comment prior to submittal to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and.. I Wildlife Service, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Fish < and Game, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Deliverable Nos. 4.1 to 4.6); 1. When directed by City staff, confirm the proposed aquatic habitat success monitoring approach (as described below under task "j") with the Regional Water Quality Control (- Board prior to commencement of monitoring and, if additional monitoring is required, . modify the approach, scope and cost, as appropriate; and ) J. I Wilen directed by City staff, as set forth in a written notice to proceed, commence aquatic habitat success monitoring pursuant to the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the project by following the California Stream Bioassessment Procedures (March 1999) or ~ similar protocol for a total of five years, proposed to consist of sampling remaining ephemeral pools in the channel following storm events in a total of four different areas as well as taking four samples from a like drainage in the project vicinity (a total of eight samples per year), sending each of the samples to a laboratory for faunal assessments, and comparing the samples from the channel to the control samples. Document the results of annual aquatic habitat success monitoring in each of the annual technical assessment reports (Deliverable Nos. 4.2 to 4.6). Table 1 Habitat Maintenance Monitorin" Schedule Year(s) Specific Period FreQuencv I # Of Visits I -- Monthly ']2 2 February - July Monthly 8 August - January Every Other Month 3 February - July Every Other Month 5 August - January Quarterly 4 and 5 -- I Quarter! y 4 per year A-4 I 6-28 6. Schedule, Milestone, Time-Limitations within which to Perform Services. Date for Commencement of Consultant Services: (X) Same as Effective Date of Agreement Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliver abIes: Deliverable No.1: Letter report (business letter format, including applicable photographs) documenting the results of the initial walk-through of the site, submitted to City staff within 30 calendar days of the walk-through. This letter report shall include separate sections describing the Otay Project, LP and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC maintenance responsibility areas, as described in Section 1 of this exhibit. Deliverable No.2: Report (bound with cover and table of contents, including apphcable photographs) documenting the monitoring event at the beginning of the five-year maintenance monitoring period to establish qualitative baseline data for the riparian habitat, submitted to City staff within 30 calendar days of the initial monitoring event to be conducted when directed by City staff. . Deliverable Nos. 3.1 to 3.29: Twenty-nine (29) memos (m"moranda of varying lengths, as necessary to document conditions and issues, int)uding photographs where warranted) to City staff documenting each maintenanc~\monitoring event and summarizing the site conditions, submitted to City staff within 30 calendar days of each maintenance monitoring event. As directed by City ~taff, the actual number of required maintenance monitoring memos may vary if the maintenance monitoring period is shortened or lengthened. These memos shall include separate sections describing the Otay Project, LP and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC -maintenance responsibility areas, as des'cribed in Section I of this exhibit. . . Deliverable Nos. 4.1 to 4.6: Six (6) reports (bound with cover and table of contents, including applicable photographs) documenting both qualitative and quantitative assessments of the riparian habitat and qualitative assessment only of the upland habitat following each technical assessment, submitted to City staff for review (within 30 calendar days of the completion of data collection) prior to submittal to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, California Department ofFish and Game, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. In addition, document the results of annual aquatic habitat success monitoring in each of the annual technical assessment reports (Deliverable Nos. 4.2 to 4.6). As directed by City staff, the actual number of required technical monitoring reports may vary if the maintenance monitoring period is shortened or lengthened. A-S 6-29 Dates for Completion of all Consultant Services: The term of this agreement shall be for five years from the date of the initial monitoring event to establish qualitative baseline data for the riparian habitat, to be conducted when directed by City staff. This contract may be extended at the sole discretion of the City Council for a one year period, for up to five additional years. 7. Documents to be provided by Applicant to Consultant: ( ) site plans ( ) grading plans ( ) architectural elevations ( ) project description. (X) other: Improvement Plans, Landscape and Irrigation Plans, Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Plan, and applicable state and federal permits. 8. Contract Administrators. City: Marilyn R.F. Ponseggi, Environmental Review Coordinator Applicant: Frank Zaidle, Vice President, McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC Kent Aden, Vice President, Otay Project, LP Consultant: Tom Huffman, Vice President, Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. 9. Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant Reporting Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code: (X) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer. ( ) Category No. 1. Investments and sources of income. ( ) Category No.2. Interests in real property. ( ) Category No.3. Investments, interest in real property and sources of income subject to the regulatory permit or licensing authority of the department. ( ) Category No.4. Investments in business entities and sources of income which engage in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property. ( ) Category No.5. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the City of Chula Vista to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. ( ) Category No.6. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the designated employee's department to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. A-6 6-30 ( ) Category No.7. Business positions. 10. Insurance Requirements: (X) Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance (X) Employer's Liability Insurance coverage: $1,000,000. (X) Commercial General Liability Insurance: $1,000,000. ( ) Errors and Omissions insurance: None Required (included in Commercial General Liability coverage). ( ) Errors and Omissions insurance: $250,000 (not included-in Commercial General Liability coverage A-7 6-31 Exhibit B Additional Recitals \VHEREAS, on April 13, 1999, the City Council of the City ofChula Vista certified Mitigated Negative Declaration No. IS-99-20 and adopted the accompanying Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Olympic Parkway Extension; and WHEREAS, on April 20, 1999, the City Council approved the "Agreement for Financing and Construction of Olympic Parkway and Related Roadway Improvements" (Agreement) by and among the City ofChula Vista, McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC, and Otay Project, LP for the segment of Olympic Parkway within the master planned community commonly known as Otay Ranch SPA One and SPA One West; and WHEREAS, the implementation ofthe MMRP and Agreement necessitates the expertise of an Environmental Monitor Specialist (Biologist) and requires the hiring of a Consultant; and WHEREAS, it was determined by the Director of Planning and Building that staff has neither the available time nor the expertise to perform the subject work; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has deposited or will deposit funds necessary for the mitigation monitoring services; and WHEREAS, the City solicited request for proposals from three qualified consulting firms in accordance WIth the City's informal bidding process, and three proposals were received by the City that were responsive to the request; and WHEREAS, waiving the City's formal bidding process for this professional service contract, is in the City's best interest because the City is in immediate need of an experienced Environmental Monitor Specialist (Biologist) that is familiar with the policies and procedures of the City, the State of Cali forma and federal resource agencies, and with the California Environmental Quality Act to ensure successful wetland, upland, and aquatic habitat creation following the City's acceptance of plant installation, which is anticipated to be granted shortly, at which time a biologist will be needed to commence the five-year maintenance and monitoring program pursuant to the City's obligations under permits issued by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game, and California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the project; and \VHEREAS, the Consultant is uniquely qualified to serve as the Environmental Monitor Specialist (Biologist) for this project based on their work on projects of a similar nature, their experience with the resource agencies, their grasp of the project's complexities, and the firm's project experience within the City ofChula Vista and the region; and B-1 6-32 \VHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has negotiated the details of this agreement in accordance with procedures set forth in the Environmental Review Procedures. WHEREAS, the proposed contract with Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. to provide mitigation monitoring services would be in an amount not to exceed $97,400. c B-2 6-33 Exhibit C Compensation Schedule and Deposit: Terms and Conditions. ( ) Single Fixed Fee Arrangement. For performance of all of the General and Detailed Services of Consultant as herein required, Applicant shall pay a single fixed fee in the amounts and at the times or milestones set forth below: ( ) Single Fixed Fee Amount: Milestone or Event Amount or Percent of Fixed Fee 1. 2. 3. 4. ( ) Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement. For the performance of each phase or portion of the General and Detailed Services of Consultant as are separately identified in Exhibit C, under the category labeled "Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement", Applicant shall pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services, in the amounts and at the times or milestones set forth hereinbelow ("Phase Fixed Fee Arrangement"). Consultant shall not commence Services under any Phase, and shall not be entitled to the compensation for a Phase, unless Applicant shall have issued a notice to proceed to Consultant as to said Phase. C-l 6-34 Phase Fee for Said Phase 1. $ 2. s 3. $ 4. $ (X) Time and Materials For performance of the General and Detailed Services of Consultant as herein required, Applicant shall pay Consultant for the productive hours of time and material spent by Consultant in the performance of said Services, at the rates or amounts set forth hereinbelow according to the following terms and conditions: (X) Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and Materials Arrangement Notwithstanding the expenditure by Consultant of time and materials in excess of said Maximum Compensation amount, Consultant agrees that Consultant will perform all of the General and Detailed Services herein required of Consultant for $97,400 including all Materials and other "reimburseables" ("Maximum Compensation"). ( ) Limitation without Further Authorization on Time and Materials Arrangement At such time as Consultant shall have incurred time and materials equal to ("Authorization Limit"), Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation without further authorization issued in writing and approved by the City Council. Nothing herein shall preclude Consultant from providing additional' Services at Consultant's own cost and expense. C-2 6-35 Category of Employee Principal Group Manager Senior Scientist Senior Project Manager Senior Biologist Senior Landscape Architect Environmental Specialist II Project Manager Biologist III Environmental Specialist I Biologist II Administrative Manager Technical Coordinator Graphics Coordinator Senior Environmental Planner Production Manager Habitat Construction Supervisor Biologist I Project Landscape Architect GIS Analyst Technical Editor Permit Specialist Assistant Production Manager Associate Biologist Environmental Planner Environmental Analyst Assistant Biologist Word Processor Construction Foreman Biological Technician Clerical Landscape Technician Rate Schedule Name Tom Huffman Larry Sward Hourly Rate $145.00 125.00 $120.00 $110.00 $11 0.00 $105.00 $100.00 $85.00 $80.00 $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 $70.00 $70.00 $65.00 $65.00 $65.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $35.00 $35.00 $25.00 Beginning in October 2003, hourly rates shall increase by 3% annually in October. Materials Separately Paid For by Applicant (X) Materials Reports Copies (X) Travel C-3 6-36 Cost or Rate Actual Actual (X) Printing (X) Postage (X) Delivery (X) Long Distance Telephone Charges (X) Other Actual Identifiable Direct Costs Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual C-4 6-37 Deposit (X) Deposit Amount: $30,000 (X) Use of Deposit to Pay Consultant. Notwithstanding the sole duty and liability of Applicant to pay Consultant, if this paragraph is "checked", upon City's receipt of billing by Consultant, and determination by City in good faith that Consultant's billing is proper, a judgment for which Applicant agrees to hold City harmless and waive any claim against City, City shall pay Consultant's billing from the amount of the Deposit. If Applicant shall protest the propriety of a billing to City in advance of payment, City shall consider Applicant's protest and any evidence submitted prior to the due date for the payment of said bill by Applicant in making its good faith determination of propriety. Otay Project, LP shall be responsible for the payment of seventy-five (75) percent and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC shall be responsible for the payment of twenty-five (25) percent of the total amount paid to the Consultant by City staff from the Deposit for work performed pursuant to this Agreement. Applicant agrees to maintain a minimum balance of $15,000 in subject account which shall be immediately replenished upon the request of the City. ( ) Use of Deposit as Security Only; Applicant to Make Billing Payments. Upon determination by City made in good faith that Consultant is entitled to compensation which shall remain unpaid by Applicant 30 days after billing, City may, at its option, use the Deposit to pay said billing. (X) Bill Processing: A. Consultant's Billing to be submitted for the following period of time: (X) Monthly ( ) Quarterly ( ) Other: B. Day of the Period for submission of Consultant's Billing: (X) First ofthe Month ( ) 15th Day of each Month ( ) End of the Month ( ) Other: C. City's Account Number: To be assigned after agreement is processed. C-5 6-38 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A FIRST Ai\1ENDMENT TO A FOUR PARTY AGREENlENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA; HELIX E1\.'VIR01'.'MENT AL PLAi'<NING, INC., CONSULTANT; Ai"\J"D MCMILLIN OTAY RANCH, LLC Ai"\J"D OTA Y PROJECT, LP, APPLICANTS, FOR CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED TO CONDUCTING ADDITIONAL MITIGATION MONITORING SERVICES FOR OLTh1PIC PARKWAY BETWEEN BRANDYWINE AVENUE Ai"\J"D SR-125. WHEREAS, on April 13, 1999, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista certified Mitigated Negative Declaration No. IS-99-20 and adopted the accompanying Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Olympic Parkway Extension; and WHEREAS, the implementation of the MMRP necessitated the expertise of an Environmental Monitor Specialist (Biologist) and required the hiring of a Consultant; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator, in accordance with procedures set forth in the Environmental Review Procedures, negotiated the details of a contract with Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., a consultant, to provide mitigation monitoring services in an amount not to exceed $97,400; and WHEREAS, on August 13, 2002 the City Council of the City of Chula Vista waived the City's formal bidding process and approved a four party agreement between the City of Chula Vista; Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., Consultant; and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC and Otay Project, LP, Applicants, to conduct mitigation monitoring services for Olympic Parkway between Brandywine Avenue and SR-125; and WHEREAS, Applicant deposited the necessary funds ($97,400) for the four party agreement to conduct mitigation monitoring services; and WHEREAS, the parties determined that it was necessary and appropriate to amend the original agreement to compensate for: I) additional maintenance monitoring and associated tasks that were required; 2) preparation of aquatic sampling protocol and sampling more locations than originally proposed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board; and 3) biologist time for management and meetings to assist with project sign-off; and 6-39 WHEREAS, Applicant has deposited or will deposit additional funds necessary ($27,345) for additional mitigation monitoring services, as specified by the First Amendment to the Four Party Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve a First Amendment to a Four Party Agreement between the City of Chula Vista; Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., Consultant; and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC and Otay Project, LP, Applicants, to conduct additional mitigation monitoring services for Olympic Parkway between Brandywine Avenue and SR-125. Presented by: Approved as to form by: . ..., ., i.' /] ) \ (ic-X /' ~., ,;"" '.: ;':: /. f- -! I. .'L.v:-~.l1\'{L .(1(,,// . (.:-~~ M.iesfe \J ~. - L/ "fG-CliifAttomey Gary Halbert Deputy City Manager/ Director of Development Services 6-40 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~ ('f:.. CITY OF ~~ (HULA VISTA June 9, 2009, Item~ ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF TAX EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED LANDINGS II AFFORDABLE HOUSING APARTMENTS RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE, SALE Al'\lD DELIVERY OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE LANDINGS II AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A LOAN AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, AND CIC LANDINGS, L.P. FOR THE HOME FINANCING OF THE LANDINGS II AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS REVIEWED BY: DEVELOP~ENIf. RVICES DIRECTOR / DEPUTY CITY MANAGE :.JcJ.- CITY MANAG "'u 4/STHS VOTE: YES D NO ~ SUBMITTED BY: SUMMARY Chelsea Investment Corporation (CIC) and Brookfield Shea have proposed the development and construction of a 1'43-unit affordable housing development for low income households, known as The Landings II. Tbe Project is located at the northwest corner of Discovery Falls Drive and Crossroads Street within the Winding Walk master planned community. To fmance the Project, crc is requesting that City Council consider the issuance of a maximum of $39 million in ta, exempt obligations by its Housing Authority and execution of a loan agreement for $2.4 million of HOME funds. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the proposed project was adequately covered in previously adopted Final Second 7-1 JUNE 9, 2009, Item--1- Page 2 of6 Tier Environmental Impact Report, EIR 01-02. Thus, no further CEQA review or documentation is necessary. Additionally, due to the use of federal funds the Environmental Review Coordinator will review the proposed project for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) prior to commencement of construction of the project. RECOMMEI'mATION The City Council hold the public hearing and adopt the resolutions. BOARDS/COJ\iIMISSION RECOMMENDATION On January 28, 2009, the Housing Advisory Commission voted to recommend the development of The Landings II at Winding Walk as an affordable rental community and the conditional approval of HOME funds to assist in its financing. On August 1, 2005, the Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed and approved the proposed site plans and architectural elevations for the Project. DISCUSSION Back...crround Brookfield Shea Otay, LLC, master developer for Otay Ranch Village II (aka Winding Walk), is required to provide 207 total affordable units (92 low-income and 115 moderate-income) within its Neighborhood R-19 in satisfaction of its obligations under the City's Balanced Communities Policy of the Housing Element. The Landings apartment development, located on the northeast corner of Eastlake Parkway and Discovery Falls Road, was completed by Chelsea Investment Corporation and provides 92 affordable rental units for lower income households. The remaining balance of the affordable housing obligation (115 units) was contemplated as affordable housing for moderate income households. Due to the current fmancial climate, the project is infeasible for moderate income households. In order to satisfY the moderate income obligation and to obtain necessary fmancing for a project, Brookfield Shea has alternatively proposed the construction of a l43-unit rental development affordable for lower income households, known as The Landings II (the "Project"). They are proposing to partner with Chelsea Investment Corporation ("CIC") to construct and operate the Project. It will be located on the adjoining lot to the 92-unit Landings I Affordable Apartments constructed and completed in November 2008. For purposes of this report Landings I will refer to the 92-unit affordable rental development completed in 2008 and Landings II will refer to the proposed 143-unit development which is the subject of the requested actions. CIC is currently in the process of securing fmancing for the Project and has requested direct financial assistance from the City and that the Housing Authority consider the issuance of ta'\ exempt obligations. On February 3, 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2009-019 conditionally approving financial assistance in the amount of 7-2 JUNE 9, 2009, Item-L Page 3 of 6 $2,400,000 from the HOME Investment Partnership Program to Chelsea Investment Corporation for the development of the Project. To substantially fInance the development and construction of the Project, CIC subrnitted an application to California Debt Limit Allocation Committee (CDLAC) on May 22, 2009 for an aggregate amount not to exceed $39 million from the 2009 state ceiling on private activity bonds for multi-family projects. On May 12,2009, the Housing Authority adopted Resolution 2009-019, expressing its preliminary intention to issue bonds for the Project. At this time, the City Council is asked to hold a public hearing on the question of whether the Housing Authority should issue tax exempt bonds for the fInancing of the project and to approve the issuance, sale, and delivery of multi-family housing revenue bonds by the Housing Authority at the time a bond allocation is received. The requested actions are preliminary and do not commit the Authority to issue the bonds. Such preliminary actions are requirements for application to the State bonding authority and to allow CIC to receive reimbursement out of bond proceeds for costs it incurs leading up to the actual sale of bonds. If successful in obtaining a bond commitment from CDLAC, CIC will come back to the Authority to request fmal approval for the issuance of the bonds. The Applicant The Chelsea Investment Corporation has developed several projects in Chula Vista, primarily in eastern Chula Vista, to satisfy developer inclusionary housing requirements (Teresina Apartments, Rancho Buena Vista Apartments, Villa Serena and The Landings I). CIC has over 5,100 housing units in its portfolio. The company has a strong and experienced team of professionals. CIC has successfully managed low income housing units for over 20 years. The PropertY The Landings II development will be built within the Winding Walk subdivision of eastern Chula Vista. The low-income units will satisfy the requirements of the City's Program for the provision of affordable housing within the Village 11 community. The development will be located at the northwest comer of Discovery Falls Drive and Crossroads Street. The Project is a continuation of design and development of the adjacent Landings I development and "ill provide a total of 143-townhome style units, with all units beilig 3-bedroom and affordable to very low and low income households. Project amenities "ill be shared with Landings I and include a pool, spa, clubhouse, and a tot lot. The Proposal All 143' units will be rented on a rent restricted basis to households whose income is at or below 50-60 percent (%) of the Area Median Income as determined by HUD. This project will provide a balance of housing opportunities and fulfIll a need in Chula Vista 7-3 JUNE 9, 2009, Item~ Page 4 of6 for large family rental housing, particularly in the neighborhoods east ofInterstate 805, as outlined in the City ofChula Vista 2005-2010 Housing Element. Income and Rent Restrictions F or the bond funding, Section 142 (d) of the Internal Revenue Services Code requires either a minimum of twenty percent of the rental units in the Project to be available for occupancy by persons or families whose income does not exceed 50 percent of the area median income (AMI) for the San Diego Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area, or alternatively, at least 40 percent of the rental units are required to be available for occupancy by persons or families whose income does not exceed 60 percent of the AMI. In each case, the units are to be made available at affordable rents established by the applicable State law. Per the Affordable Housing Agreement for the inclusionary obligation, a minimum of 115 units must be affordable to moderate income households. Due to the financing CIC is pursuing, the Project will exceed these minimum requirements and provide 28 more units and deeper affordability. 3 Bd/2 Ba 3 Bd/2 Ba MGR Total 143 CIC proposes to maintain the income and rent restrictions for The Landings II for a period not less than fifty-five years, exceeding the 30-year term of the bonds. The income and rent restrictions outlined above are to be incorporated into the Regulatory Agreement for the bonds, which will be recorded against the property. Compliance with the income and rent restrictions will be subject annually to a regulatory audit and annual tax credit certification. Compliance with strict property management policies and procedures will ensure that income and rent restrictions will be maintained for the full 55-year compliance period, and will bind all subsequent owners of The Landings II, so that the commitment remains in force regardless of ownership. Proposed Financin2: of Proiect Financing and development of The Landings is proposed as a Jomt private-public partnership. CIC will be using Tax Exempt Multi-Family Revenue Bonds and Low Income Housing Tax Credit fmancing to support the majority of the estimated $48.3 million ($337,245 per unit) cost of constructing the project (see Attachment 2). Chelsea Investment Corporation has requested that the Housing Authority of the City of Chula Vista consider the issuance of up to $39 million in private placement bonds, which is the projected maximum construction loan. The permanent bond loan is estimated at 7-4 if --; JUN 9, 2009, Item~ Page 5 of 6 approximately $15.7 million. Chelsea Investment Corporation will apply for approximately $15.3 million in Low Income Housing Tax Credits. The permanent bonds and Tax Credits would cover over 65 percent of the estimated cost. The balance is expected to be provided by the City subsidy, other contributions and a deferred developer fee. The required documents ",ill be presented to the City/Housing Authority for approval at such time as fmal approval of the issuance of the bonds and the related bond/loan documents are requested. Form of City Assistance - HOME Funds The City Council adopted Resolution 2009-019 conditionally approving $2,400,000 in financial assistance from HOME Investment Partnership funds, to assist 11 units at the very low and/or'low income range. Assistance will be in the form of a loan (see Attachment 3) and secured by a note and deed of trust recorded against the property. The principal and interest on the loan will be amortized over fifty-five years and repaid from cash surplus in annual installments. The City is required to use its HOME funds solely for the purpose of providing affordable housing for low-income persons. Federal requirements outline timeframes in which HOME dollars must be allocated and actually expended. By June 30, 2009, the City must commit $944,184 to eligible activities. With no current plans for the expenditure of HOME funds and looming expenditure deadlines, the funding of this project will assist the City in meeting the allocation and expenditure requirements. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMP ACT Bond fmancing is a self-supporting program with the owner responsible for the payment of all costs of issuance and other costs and repayment of the bonds. All costs related to the issuance of the bonds will be paid from bond proceeds or profits. The bonds will be secured by the project and will not constitute a liability to or obligation of the City or Housing Authority. The City of Chula Vista Housing Authority will receive compensation for its services in preparing the bond issuance by charging an origination fee of 1/8 of 1 % of the bond loan, approximately $48,125. The fmancial assistance of $2,400,000 is available from the City's allocation of HOME Investment Partnership grant funds. The loan amount of $2,400,000 will be used towards a loan for CIC, Landings L.P. for costs related to the development ofthe Landings. The HOME grant funds could also provide additional funds specifically for project management costs; which will offset staff time and overhead costs related to loan underwriting, legal services, and environmental review. 7-5 JUNE 9, 2009, Item-L Page 6 of6 ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Staff costs associated with monitoring compliance of the regulatory restrictions and administration of the outstanding bonds will be reimbursed from an annual administrative fee of approximately $19,625 (based upon 1/8 of 1% of the permanent bond loan) paid to the Housing Authority by the owner. ATTACHMENTS I. Locator Map 2. Swnmary of Sources and Uses 3. Construction and Permanent Financing Loan Agreement 4. Disclosure Statement Prepared by: Leilani Hines, Principal Project Coordinator, Development Services Department 7-6 Attachment 1 The Landings II at Winding Walk 7-7 , , 5 "- , , " 5 C o , , R , mRa; The landings I & II 2122 Burdoclc Way , Project Cost Sources of Funds Subsidies TOTAL The Landings at Wmding Walk PROFORMA SUBSIDY At~AL YSIS Cost Funds Attachment 2 Financing Gap Acquisition Construction DesignlEngineering Contingency Permits & Fees Interest/Fees, Financing Costs Reserves, Legal, Other Developer Fees Tax Credit Equity Permanent Loan (Bond) Shea Loan (Bond) Subtotal $ City Loan Other Contribution Deferred Developer Fee Cost per Unit @ 143 Units) City/Agency Subsidy per Unit @ 11 Units $280,000 $31,540,000 $1,300,000 $1,116,000 $7,105,000 $2,950,000 $1,435,000 $2,500,000 $15,300,000 $15,700,000 $11,550,000 48,226,000 $ 42,550,000 $ $ 48,226,000 $ 7-8 $2,400,000 $2,000,000 $1,276,000 48,226,000 $ 5,140,000 $ $ 337,245 218,182 ATTACHMENT 3 CONSTRUCTION AL~D PER.I\1A.l'iENT FI1"lANCING LO..c\J.~ AGREEMENT By and Between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA a public body, corporate and politic and CIC Landings 2, L.P., a California Limited Partnership 7-9 ATTACHMENT 4 Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Council Polley 101-01, prior to any action upon matters that will require discretionary action by the Council, Planning Commission and aU other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments. or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista election must be filect The folbwing information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of aU persons haYing a financial interest In the property that Is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. Applicant Chelsea Investment Corporatlof't Owner: Landinqs 2. LP.. Cle landinQ:s 2. LLC (Admin. GP), Pacific Southwest Community Oe.~lotment (GP} Contractor: None selected 2. If any person' idenlified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all indMduals witl1 a $2000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) enlily. James J. Schmid 3. If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or tNst, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. Robert W. LainQ Michael Walsh Mario Antonio Reves Kimberly Collins 4. Please identify every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. Wallace Dieckmann 5. Has any person" associated witn this contract had any financial dealings with an offrciar" of the City of Otula Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months. YesL- No_ James J. Schmid is a member of tho managing member of lhe Adm.,istrative Gen<<a.l Partner of the Umiled Partnership which owns The landings 1 and II Apartment complexes, the affordable ho.Jslng projects meeting the i1cIusionary requirements 01 the Windngwalk subdIVisiOn. These projects received City financial assiStance. Additionally, James J. Schmid and WaJlCe C. Oiodmann have given donations to the poItIcli campaig1s fot City Council members Pamela 6ensouBSan and SteV'l Castaneda.. If Y os, briefly describe the nature of the fi nancial interest the official" may have in this contract. None 6. Have you made a contribulion of more than $250 wijhin the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the Chuia VISta City Council? No _ Yes ~ If yes, which Council member? Donation to pofitical campaigns for City CoLndI members Pamela Bensoussan and Steve Castaneda 7-10 7. Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official" of the City of Chula Vista In the past twelve (12) months? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loon, etc,) Yes -L. No If Yes, which official" and what was the natura of item provided? Donation 10 political campai n for Ci Coc.rd Membec Steve Castaneda. Date: June 4, 2009 James J. Schmid Print or type narne of Contractor/Applicant Person is defined as: any indiVidual, firm, Q;partnersnip. joint \lenturs, association, sociaJ cJub, fraternal organization, corporation. estate. trust. receiver. syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, dIstrict, or other political subdivision. -or any other group or combination acting as a unit. .. Official includes, but is not Iim~ed to: Mayor, Cooncil member, Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation member, PlannIng Commissioner. member of a ooard. commission. or committee of the City, employee. or staff members. September 8, 2006 7-11 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE ISSUAJ."ICE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE LANDINGS II AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the Housing Authority of the City of Chula Vista (the "Authority") intends to issue not to exceed $39,000,000 aggregate principal amount of multifamily housing revenue bonds (the "Bonds") to finance the acquisition and construction of a 1 43-unit multifamily rental housing project (the "Project") located at the northwest comer of Discovery Falls Drive and Crossroads Street in the City of Chula Vista; and WHEREAS, the Project will be owned and/or operated by a limited partnership of which Chelsea Investment Corporation ("CIC"), or an affiliate thereof, will be the administrative general partner (the "Owner"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the Bonds are required to be approved, following a public hearing, by an elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located; and WHEREAS, the Project is located wholly within the geographic jurisdiction of the City ofChula Vista (the "City"); and WHEREAS, the City Council (the "City Council") is the elected legislative body of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has caused a notice to appear in the Star News, which is a newspaper of general circulation in the City, on May 22, 2009 to the effect that a public hearing would be held by the City Council on June 9, 2009, regarding the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority; and WHEREAS, On June 9, 2009, the City Council held said public hearing, at which time an opportunity was provided to present arguments both for and against the issuance of the Bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, as follows: Section I. The City Council does hereby find and declare that the above recitals are true and correct. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, the City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority in one or more series, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $39,000,000 and with a final maturity not later than forty-five (45) years DOCSOCI134194 7v2/024036-003 8 7-12 from the date of issuance to [mance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this Resolution constitute approval of the issuance of the Bonds by the applicable elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located, in accordance with said Section l47(f). Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by Gary Halbert Deputy City Manager! Development Services Director e .....~\ ,) '"---.J mart Miesfi ' ,\"CltYi\ttorney 2 DOCSOC/1341947v2l024036-0038 7-13 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- - COUNCIL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A LOAl'\[ AGREEi\fENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, AND CIC LANDINGS, L.P. FOR THE HOME FINANCING OF THE LANDINGS II AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the City ofChula Vista ("City") has been allocated fimds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") pursuant to the federal government's HOME Investment Partnerships Program (42 U.S.C. Section 1274, et seq.) which can be used to provide subsidies to or for the benefit of very low income and lower income households in accordance with HOME regulations (24 C.F.R. Section 92, et seq.); WHEREAS, City has adopted a Housing Element to the City General Plan which sets forth the objective of providing housing to satisfy the needs and desires of various age, income and ethnic groups of the community, and which specifically provides for the development of rental housing units through City assistance; WHEREAS, Chelsea Investment Corporation ("Developer") proposes to construct a 143 -unit multifamily rental development, with units affordable to very low households at 50 percent of the Area Median Income (Al\1I) and to low households at 60 percent of the Area Median Income (Al\l1I) within the Winding Walk master planned community on a vacant site (LotI of Map No. 15479) located east of Eastlake Parkway south of Birch Road and north of Crossroads Street in the City of Chula Vista ("Project"); WHEREAS, Developer is applying for an allocation of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds from the California Debt Lirnit Allocation Committee (CD LAC) and four percent (4%) tax credits from the Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) to support the majority of the development and construction costs of the Project; WHEREAS, additional financing is still necessary in order to make the Project feasible; and WHEREAS, on February 3, 2009, pursuant to Resolution No. 2009-019, City conditionally approved fmancial assistance, subject to future appropriation, in an amount not to exceed $2,400,000 from the City's HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) funds to assist in the development of the Landings Affordable Apartments and the direct financing of eleven (11) HOME units subject to the City's approval of a Construction and Permanent Financing Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") and certain minimum conditions; 7-14 WHEREAS, in order to implement the requirements of the HOME funds, City shall enter into a Loan Agreement with the Developer, pursuant to which the City would provide a loan not to exceed Two Million Four Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($2,400,000.00) to the Developer, and the Developer shall develop, construct, and operate the Project, restricting the occupancy of 11 HOME-assisted units in the Project to very low income, and rent those units at an affordable rent in compliance with the HOME regulations; and WHEREAS, the City has duly considered all terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement and believes that the Agreement is in the best interest ofthe City and the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable Federal, State and local law requirements; WHEREAS, the City's provision of $2,400,000 for the eleven (11) HOME assisted units ($218,182 per unit subsidy) does not exceed the HOME Program's Section 221 (d)(3) maximum per unit subsidy limits ($228,780 per HOME assisted 3-bedroom unit) effective January 1, 2009; WHEREAS, the City's provision of funds to the Project will directly improve the City's supply of very low and low income housing and is consistent with and called for by the City's General Plan Housing Element and Consolidated Plan; WHEREAS, the City's Housing Advisory Commission did, on the 28th day ofJanuary, 2009, hold a public meeting to consider said request for financial assistance; WHEREAS, the Housing Advisory Commission, upon hearing and considering all testimony, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, and considering all factors relating to the request for financial assistance, has recommended to the City Council that the conditional fmancial assistance be approved because the Commission believes that the City's fmancial participation in the development of the Project will be a sound investment based upon Developer's ability to effectively serve the City's housing needs and priorities as expressed in the Housing Element and the Consolidated Plan and the cost effectiveness of the City's fmancial assistance based upon the leveraging of such resources; WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the proposed project has had adequate prior review and is in compliance with the previously adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, EIR 0 1-02 and no further action by the City Council is necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City ofChula Vista as follows: 1. The City Council hereby approves the Loan Agreement in substantially the form presented. The City Manager and his designee are hereby authorized to sign all documents, to make all approvals and take all actions necessary or appropriate to carry out and implement the Loan Agreement and to administer the obligations, responsibilities and duties of the City to be performed under the Loan Agreement, and related documents. 7-15 2. The City Attorney, on behalf of the City, is hereby authorized to make revisions to the Loan Agreement which do not materially or substantially increase the obligations of the City thereunder or materially or substantially change the uses or development permitted on the Site. Presented by Approved as to form by Gary Halbert Deputy City Manager/ Development Services Director _.~ Ntf'. \ /,/ '... ....--..../ [ --.. i I \c</~ 1.:\ ' r B~MiJ:~ .. 0' i(!LLVd .~,&ty Attorney 7-16 CONSTRUCTION Al"lD PER1\1ANENT FINANCING LOAN AGREElVIENT THIS CONSTRUCTION A-1'fD PER1\'IANENT FINAL~CING LOAN AGREElVIENT, (the "Agreement") is entered into as of this _ day of June, 2009, by and between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a public body, corporate and politic ("City"), and CIe Landings 2, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Borrower"), and/or its successors or assignees as follows: RECITALS A. Authority: City is a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California, City is authorized to enter into binding agreements for the purpose of protecting public health, safety, and welfare. B. Available Funds: City has been allocated funds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("BUD") pursuant to the federal government's HOJ\;fE Investment Partnership Act Program (42 U.S.C. 1274, et seq) which can be used, subject to final BUD approval, for the purposes of funding certain City obligations under this Agreement in accordance with HOME Program regulations (24 C.F.R. 92 et seq). C. The Property: Borrower is or will become the legal owner of the fee title to the real property located on the corner of Discovery Falls Road and Crossroads Street within Otay Ranch Village II in the City of Chula Vista, also known as Lot 1 of Chula Vista Tract No. 01-11, as described in the attached Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein (the "Property"). D. Proiect: Borrower proposes to construct and permanently finance 142 affordable housing units, one (I) manager's unit and a community room (collectively, the "Improvements") on the Property. The majority of the residential units will be restricted as affordable units tolow income households through an Affordable Housing Agreement for Village Eleven's (aka Winding Walk) Inclusionary Housing Requirement. Units will be further restricted though other funding sources under the terms of a separate Affordable Housing Agreement. The financial contribution from the City, in the form of HOME Program Funds, will restrict II units to very low income households at or below 50 percent of AMI (the "Project"). The Project will be subject to certain affordable housing obligations pursuant to a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions by and among the Borrower and the City (the "Declaration"). E. City Financial Assistance to Borrower: Through the development and operation of the Project, City and Borrower desire to provide very low and low income households with affordable housing opportunities within the City in accordance with the City's Consolidated Plan and the Housing Element of the City General Plan, specifically Housing Element Policy 5.1.1. In order to accomplish this goal, the City desires to make a loan to Borrower from its HOJ\;fE funds to Borrower for a portion of the costs of the construction of the Project, subject to certain conditions designed to assure the implementation of the Project in accordance with the General Plan, state and federal law, HOJ\;fE Program regulations and as otherwise provided herein. Landings II Loan Agreement 1 7-17 F. Interests of the City and the Public: The development of the Property pursuant to this Agreement, the fulfillment generally of this Agreement and the construction of the lmprovements pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, are in the vital and best interest of the City of Chula Vista and the health, safety, morals and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable state and local laws and requirements under which the development of the Project has been undertaken. G. The City of Chula Vista by Resolution No. 2009-019, adopted on February 3, 2009, conditionally approved the funding by the City of the City Loan. H. The City of Chula Vista by Resolution No. 2009-_, adopted on June 9, 2009, authorized the execution of this Loan Agreement by and between City and Borrower. NOW THEREFORE, in furtherance of the recitals stated above, the mutual and prospective covenants set forth below, the Parties agree, promise and declare as follows: Definitions The following terms as used in this Agreement shall have the meanings given unless expressly provided to the contrary: "Affordable Housing Agreement" means that certain agreement, between the Borrower and the City, which sets forth Borrower's obligations to 'maintain the Project as an affordable multifamily housing project for lower income households in satisfaction of requirements to provide affordable housing within the Winding Walk master planned community consistent with Housing Element Policy 5.1. Said Affordable Housing Agreement is not attached to this Agreement. "Bonds" means the Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds issued by the Housing Authority of the City of Chula Vista in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed of $38.5 million and Noll 00 Dollars ($38,000,000.00). "Borrower" means CIC Landings 2, L.P., a California limited partnership. The term "Borrower" includes any legally permissible assignee or successor to the rights, powers, and responsibilities of Borrower hereunder, following such assignment and succession, in accordance with Section 7.10 of this Agreement. "Borrower's Limited Partner" means the limited partner referenced in the Borrower's Partnership Agreement, as approved by the City, in its reasonable discretion, and its successors and assigns. "Certificate of Occupancy" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 5.9 of this Agreement. The form of the Certificate of Occupancy shall be as approved by the City Attomey, in his/her reasonable discretion. "City" means the City of Chula Vista, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California and having its offices at 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California 91910. 2 7-18 Landings II Loan Agreement "City Deed of Trust" means that certain deed of trust which secures the Borrower's obligations pursuant to the City Note and which shall be recorded in the order of priority set forth in this Agreement), in a form and format as approved by the City Attorney, in hislher reasonable discretion. "City Loan" means the loan from the City to Borrower as provided in this Agreement in an original principal amount not to exceed Two Million Four Hundred Thousand and NollOa Dollars ($2,400,000.00), and as further defined in this Agreement. "City Note" means the promissory note evidencing the City Loan, in a form and format as approved by the City Attorney, in hislher reasonable discretion. "Declaration" means the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions between the Borrower and the City. "Developer" means Chelsea Investment Corporation, a California corporation, and its successors and assigns, as approved by the City, in hislher reasonable discretion. "Development Fee" and "Deferred Development Fee" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 4.1. "Effective Date" means the date first appearing in this Agreement above. "Gross Revenue" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 2.6 (b)(I). "HOME Units" means the eleven (II) dwelling units to be constructed by Borrower on the Property, that are restricted pursuant to the HOME Program for a period of twenty (20) years by the Declaration, which includes restrictions related to the maximwn rents which may be charged, and to the tenants that are eligible to reside in such units, all of which are in furtherance of the City's goals of making available homes, either for rent or for sale, to that section of population who cannot afford to buy or rent locally on the open market. "Housing Manager" means the Housing Manager of the Development Services Department of the City Of Chula Vista. "Partnership Agreement" means the Limited Partnership, for the Borrower, as such may be amended or supplemented from time to time, and as approved by the City, in its reasonable discretion. "Project" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section D of this Agreement. "Property" means that certain real property legally described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. '.Property Manager" means the property management company managing the Project, whether or not the Project is managed by Borrower. The term Property Manager shall not mean the on-site property manager. .b Landings II Loan Agreement 3 7-19 "Reasonable Operating Expenses" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 2.6 (b)(l). "Regulatory Agreement" or "Bond Regulatory Agreement", the terms being synonymous, means the Regulatory Agreement by and among the Borrower, the Bond Issuer. "Residual Receipts" shall have the meaning as ascribed in Section 2.6 (b). "Restricted Units" means the residential units in the Project whose rent levels and occupancy are to be restricted as set forth in this Agreement. "TCAC Regulatory Agreement" means that regulatory agreement entered into by and between the Borrower and the TCAC, as that term is hereinafter defmed, concerning the Project. 'Title Insurer" means the title insurance company chosen by the Borrower for the Project, as reasonably approved by the City. ARTICLE 1. Financing of the Project Section 1.1 Summary of Financing: Borrower contemplates a total project budget of approximately $49.3 million. Borrower intends to finance the Property and Improvements using: (i) a construction and permanent loan financing funded by the Chula Vista Housing Authority ("Bond IssuerlLender"), in a maximum aggregate principal amount of $38.5 million and Noll 00 Dollars, which are plmed to be issued by the Bond IssuerlLender (the "Bond Loan"); (ii) approximately fifteen million three hundred thousand and NoI100 Dollars ($15,300,000.00) of four percent (4%) tax credit equity (the "Tax Credits"); (iii) financial contribution in the approximate amount of two million and Noll 00 Dollars ($2,000,000.00) from the Eastlake Company, LLC in satisfaction of its affordable housing obligations as specified in the Eastlake III Section Planning Area plan consistent with Housing Element Policy No. 5.1; (iv) deferral of one million two hundred seventy six thousand and Noll 00 Dollars ($1,276,000.00) of the developer fee (the "Deferred Developer Fee"); and (v) the City Loan. This Agreement is being executed in connection with and City's obligation to make the City Loan and is contingent upon the Borrower obtaining the Tax Credits and Construction Loan, obtaining a commitment for the Permanent Loan and deferring the Deferred Developer Fee. Section 1.2 City acknowledges that the foregoing amounts (other than the amount of the City Loan) are approximations and may change, provided, however, the maximum amount of debt senior to the City Loan shall not increase by more than 10% in aggregate. In no event shall the City Loan fund, if the amount of debt senior to the City Deed of Trust exceeds the limit referenced above, without the further written consent of the City. ARTICLE 2. City Loan Section 2.1 Construction and Permanent Financing Loan and Authorization. City will fund the City Loan to Borrower according to and upon the terms and conditions set forth below. The proceeds of the City Loan shall be used by Borrower solely tor the purposes of constructing and permanently fmancing the HOlvfE Units. This Agreement and the City Loan are in furtherance of and authorized by the provisions of the federal government's HOME Investment Partnership Act Program (42U.S.C. 12741 et seq) hereinafter referred to as "the HOME Program", pursuant 4 7-20 Landings II Loan Agreement ~ to which: (i) the City has designated the construction of housing affordable to very low and low income households as a program of its Aillnual Plan; (ii) the City has found that the construction and use of the Property and the Improvements pursuant to this Agreement will be consistent with the Annual Plan and provide benefit to the City; and (iii) out of the total of one hundred forty three (143) units in the Project, eleven (II) three-bedroom units are being assisted \Vith HOME funds (the "HOME units") and used exclusively to provide housing for "very low income and lower income families" as defined in the Sections 50105 and 50079.5 of the California Health & Safety Code, respectively, at "affordable rents" as defIned by Section 50053(a) of the California Health & Safety Code. All HOME units must meet all of the HOME requirements for the term of the affordability restrictions on the units. The specific units to be designated HOME units may change from time to time in Borrower's sole discretion, kno\VTI as "floating units", provided that the aggregate number and category of said units remains the same. Section 2.2 Loan Amount and Funding. (a) Loan Amount. The original principal amount of the City Loan shall not exceed Two Million Four Hundred Thousand and Noll 00 Dollars ($2,400,000). The City Loan shall be disbursed as set forth in Section 2.5, below. (b) Funding. City's obligation to fund the City Loan shall be and is specifIcally conditioned upon Borrower obtaining the Tax Credits and Construction Loan and deferring the Deferred Developer Fee, City approving the preliminary title reports concerning the Property, payment of all taxes now due and payable on the Property, issuance of an AL T A Lender's policy insuring the City Loan satisfactory to the City Manager, satisfaction of all conditions precedent to City's obligation to make the City Loan, and satisfaction of those conditions set forth in Section 2.12 of this Agreement. Section 2.3 Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The obligation of City to make and fund the City Loan hereunder is subject to the execution and recordation of the Declaration. The Declaration shall contain the housing payment and income level restrictions for the one hundred forty two (142) Affordable Units for a period of fIfty-five (55) years. Rents will provide affordable housing to households earning between fifty percent (50%) and sixty percent (60%) of area median income as referenced in the Declaration. The monthly rental rate shall be as set forth in the Declaration. The rents may be subject to modification annually as set forth in the Declaration. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the Declaration shall be recorded in a position superior and prior to all encumbrances on the Property. Section 2.4 PromissorY Note & Deed of Trust. (a) PromissorY Note. (1) The City Loan shall be evidenced by a promissory note executed by Borrower, in favor of City, in the amount of the City Loan and incorporated herein by reference (the "City Note"), and shall be subject to the terms and conditions contained therein. Landings II Loan Agreement 5 7-21 (2) The City Note shall bear interest at three percent (3%) simple interest per annum. For purposes of this Section, Year I means the period of time that begins on the date the Improvements are Placed in Service and ends on December 31 of the same calendar year. Subsequent "Years.' during the term of the City Loan shall mean each calendar year immediately following the end of the immediately preceding Year and shall be numbered consecutively thereafter. Interest shall accrue and payments of principal and interest shall be due and payable as defined in Section 2.6 hereof. (3) Upon completion of construction of all one hundred forty three (143) dwelling units at the Property and issuance of the certificate of occupancy in connection therewith, nothing herein contained shall be deemed to cause Borrower (or any of its partners, or any of their respective directors, officers, employees, partners, principals or members) personally to be liable to payor perform any of its obligations evidenced hereby, and the City shall not seek any personal or deficiency judgment on such obligations, and the sole remedy of the City with respect to the repayment of the City Loan shall be against the Property; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not in any way affect any rights the City may have (as a secured party or otherwise) hereunder or under the City Note, City Deed o(Trust, or any other rights the City may have to: (a) recover directly from the Borrower any funds, damages or costs (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs) incurred by the City as a result of fraud, intentional misrepresentation or intentional waste by Borrower; or (b) recover directly from the Borrower any condemnation or insurance proceeds, or other similar funds or payments attributable to the Property which under the terms of the City Deed of Trust should have been paid to the City, and any costs and expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs). (4) Should Borrower agree to or actually sell, convey, transfer, further encumber or dispose of the Property or any interest in it (except as provided in the City Note), without first obtaining the written consent of the holder of the City Note (i.e., the City) as required by Section 7.1 0, then all obligations secured by the City Note may be declared due and payable at the option of City. The consent to one transaction of this type will not constitute a waiver of the right to require consent to future or successive transactions. The resident tenant restrictions set forth in the Declaration and referenced in Section 2.3of this Agreement shall remain in place whether or not City approves or disapproves a successor-in-interest for the term of fifty-five (55) years. (5) The parties acknowledge that the City Loan is not a purchase money mortgage as defined in Code of Civil Procedure Section 580b. (b) Deed of Trust. The City Note shall be secured by the City Deed of Trust encumbering the Property, which shall be junior and subordinate to the liens securing the Bond Loan, the TCAC Regulatory Agreement, the Bond Regulatory Agreement and the Affordable Housing Agreement. The City Deed of Trust shall further provide that the occurrence of any default pursuant to Section 8.1 of this Agreement shall constitute a "default" or "event of default" under such Deed of Trust. 6 7-22 Landings II Loan Agreement (c) Execution and Recordation. Prior to the close of escrow for the Borrower's acquisition of the Property, Borrower shall execute, acknowledge, and deliver to City the City Note and the City Deed of Trust. The City Deed of Trust shall be recorded with the Office of the San Diego County Recorder in accordance with City's instructions to escro,v. Borrower shall be responsible for any and all of City's escrow, title and recording costs arising in connection with the City Loan, such costs to be paid by Borrower through escrow. (d) Additional Security. Borrower shall execute and deliver to City such separate security agreements, UCC-l fmancing statements, consents or certificates, assignments and other documents or instruments as City may require (the "Security Agreement") and reflecting security interests in the personalty used in connection with the operation of the Property as City may require. In addition thereto, Borrower shall execute and deliver such security agreements, and the like, as required by City in connection with the Deed of Trust. Specifically, Borrower agrees that any notice of default and/or copy of any notice of sale ",ill be mailed to City in compliance with Section 2924b of the California Civil Code. Section 2.5 Disbursement. (a) Disbursement at Closing. Upon the removal and approval of all contingencies by the City, as required under the terms of Section 2.12 of this Agreement and upon the acquisition of the Property, the City shall deposit ninety percent (90%) of the principal amount of the City Loan with Construction Lender, which shall be held and disbursed in accordance with the Construction Loan documents approved by the City. (b) Submission of Draw Requests. During construction, Borrower shall submit to Construction Lender written draw requests supported by such back up documentation as Construction Lender and/or the Construction Loan documents require and Borrower shall provide a copy of the same to the City. (d), Approval of Draw Requests. Construction Lender shall inspect the work to determine its completion and shall thereafter approve, approve in part, or disapprove such draw request in accordance with the written requirements of the Construction Loan documents. Construction Lender and/or Borrower shall provide copies of any and all construction inspector's reports and copies of all wire transfer confirmations with respect to Construction Loan and/or City Loan disbursements. (e) Limit on Effect of Approval. Review and/or approval of any work by the Construction Lender, disbursement or monies pursuant to a draw request, or any City review and/or approval of the Construction Loan documents and/or work shall be understood to be general review and/or approval only, and shall not relieve Borrower of the responsibility to design, engineer, and construct the Improvements in accordance with all applicable laws, codes, regulations, and good design, construction, and engineering practice. Any deficiencies or defects shall be corrected at Borrower's cost and expense and without any cost to the City. (f) Disbursements Conditioned on Lien Releases. Disbursements of approved draws by Construction Lender shall be conditioned upon Construction Lender's receipt of evidence of Landings II Loan Agreement 7. 7-23 Borrower's use of a lien release as required by the Construction Loan documents for payments or disbursements. (g) Final 10%. Ten percent (10%) of the City Loan, $240,000.00, shall be withheld and shall not be funded, regardless of expenditures and draw requests, unless and until a certificate of occupancy for all one hundred forty three (143) dwelling units to be constructed at the Property has been issued. Section 2.6 Repavment. (a) Payments under the City Loan shall be made as follows: Commencing on the Initial Payment Date (defined below), payment of principal and interest on the City Note shall be made, on an annual basis, in an amount equal to the City's proportionate share of the Residual Receipts (defined below) for the previous calendar year. Residual Receipts shall be calculated by Borrower each and every year commencing with the first anniversary of the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy by the City. The fifty percent (50%) Residual Receipts payments, if any, shall be made on or before thirty (30) days after the later of (i) the first year anniversary of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy by the City or (ii) the first year anniversary of the date on which the Deferred Development Fee, if any, has been paid in full (the "Initial Payment Date"), and on or before 30 days after each subsequent yearly anniversary of the Initial Payment Date. (b) "Residual Receipts" is specifically defined as the "Gross Revenue" (as detmed below) from the Project minus the "Reasonable Operating Expenses" (as defined below) for the same period. (1) "Gross Revenue" shall mean all revenue, income, receipts, and other consideration actually received from operation and leasing of the Project. Gross Revenue shall include, but not be limited to: all rents, fees and charges paid by tenants, Section 8 payments or other rental subsidy payments received for the dwelling units, all cancellation fees; proceeds from vending and laundry room machines; the proceeds of business interruption or similar insurance to the extent not applied to the Bond Loan; the proceeds of casualty insurance to the extent not utilized to repair or rebuild the Project or applied to the Bond Loan; and condemnation awards for a taking of part or all of the Project for a temporary period to the extent not applied to the Bond Loan or used to repair or restore the Project. Gross Revenue shall not include tenants' security deposits, loan proceeds, capital contributions or similar advances or payments from reserve funds. (2) "Reasonable Operating Expenses" shall include any and all reasonable and actually incurred costs associated with the ownership, operation, use or maintenance of the Property, calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Such expenses may include, without limitation, property and other ta.xes and assessments imposed on the Project; premiums for property damage, liability and business interruption insurance; utilities not directly paid for by the tenants including, without limitation, water, sewer, trash collection, gas and electricity, maintenance and repairs including, \Vithout limitation, pest control, landscaping and grounds maintenance, painting and decorating, cleaning, general repairs, and supplies; tenant relocation costs and expenses; license fees or certificate of occupancy fees required for operation 8 7-24 Landings II Loan Agreement of the Project; general administrative expenses directly attributable to the Property including, without limitation, advenising and marketing, security services and systems, and professional fees for legal, audit and accounting; property management fees and reimbursements including on-site manager and assistance manager expenses; any fees and distributions payable to Borrower's Investor Limited Partner pursuant to thy Partnership Agreement, including but not limited to the Cumulative Priority Distribution, as such terms are defined in the Partnership Agreement, debt service on any loan made to the Borrower by any partner of the Borrower to cover operating expenses; a reasonable property management fee, cash deposited into a reserve for capital replacements of the Project improvements and an operating reserve (and such other reserve accounts required with respect to the Bond Loan) in such amounts as are required by the Bond Issuer/Lender and as may be reasonably required by Project equity investors; tenant services costs; debt service payments on all senior debt (excluding debt service due to City from Residual Receipts of the Project) on fmancing for the Project; reasonable supplemental management fees; and payment of the Deferred Development Fee. In no event shall expenditures, including attorneys' fees or litigation costs, normally required to be paid out of the Replacement Reserve, be treated as Reasonable Operating Expenses unless specifically approved in writing by the City. For purposes of the foregoing definition of "Reasonable Operating Expenses," any propeny management fee or partnership management fee which is paid to Borrower or an affiliate of Borrower shall at no time exceed an amount as is customary and standard for affordable housing projects similar in size, scope and character to the Project. Nomithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of this calculation, Reasonable Operating Expenses shall not include the following: principal and interest payments on any debt subordinate to the City Note (except debt service on loans made to the Borrower by a partner to cover operating expenses, as provided above), depreciation, amortization, depletion or other non-cash expenses, incentive partnership asset management fees payable to the Borrower or its affiliate (other than the supplemental management fee described above), or any amount expended from a reserve account. In the event that any of the above costs is incurred partially with respect to the Project, the parties shall mutually agree upon an allocable portion of such costs which shall be deemed Reasonable Operating Expenses of the Project for the purposes of this Agreement. (c) The fifty percent (50%) of Residual Receipts remaining after the annual Residual Receipts payments on the City Note may be retained and used by Borrower in Borrower's sole discretion. (d) Except as otherwise expressly provided hereunder, Borrower's obligation to repay the City Loan shall be limited to Borrower's annual payment, until the City Loan is repaid in full, of fifty percent (50%) of the Residual Receipts as described above, to be applied to the payment of the City Loan for a period from the completion of the Project until the date which is fifty-five (55) years following the date of the City's issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the Project (but in no event later than sixty (60) years from the date of execution of the City Note) (the "Conditional Maturity Date"). Upon the Conditional Maturity Date, City shall have the option, at any time, in its sole discretion, but after good faith discussions with Borrower as to available options, upon ninety (90) days' written notice to Borrower, to (a) declare the remaining balance of all amounts owed under the City Note immediately due and payable, or (b) to require installment payments under the City Note based upon (i) a restated principal balance comprised, in the aggregate, of any and all outstanding principal and interest Landings IT Loan Agreement 9 7-25 under the City Note existing as of the date of its election, (ii) a prospective fIxed interest rate per annum equal to the prime rate then in effect for Bank of America, San Diego offIce, or such other rate mutually agreed to by the City and Borrower, and (iii) monthly installments of principal and interest paid over the course of an amortization schedule to be determined by the City in its sole discretion, not to be less than ten (10) years. In the event that City elects repayment approach (b), Borrower agrees to execute an amendment to the Note in favor of City reflecting the amended repayment terms described above. ee) Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that Borrower, or any successors thereto, is in default under this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1 hereof, the City shall have the right in its sole discretion, to declare immediately due and payable all outstanding principal, interest and other sums due under the City Note, or to pursue any and all other remedies provided herein, under the City Note, City Deed of Trust, or the Affordable Housing Agreement, or as otherwise provided at law or in equity. Section 2.7 Prepavrnent: Borrower may prepay the principal and interest due under the City Note in whole or in part at any time and from time to time, without notice or penalty. Any prepayment shall be allocated fIrst to unpaid interest and then to principal. Borrower acknowledges that prepayment of the City Loan shall not in any manner affect any obligation or restriction related to maintaining the units as "Affordable Units" during the fIfty-five (55) year term. Section 2.8 Assumption: In the event the Project is sold or transferred as approved by the City or otherwise permitted pursuant to Section 7.10 hereof, the City Loan shall be fully assumable by the approved or permitted transferee. Section 2.9 Unsecured Environmental Indemnitv. Borrower shall enter into an Unsecured Environmental Indemnity Agreement, as approved by City, in favor of City and shall name City and its Redevelopment Agency as named additional insureds on its insurance policies. Said policies shall be acceptable to the City's Director of Development Services and shall insure against any and all losses which may occur as a result of problems, claims, work, and the like associated with the construction of the Improvements. Section 2.10 Lien Priority. Title Insurance. As a condition to the obligations of City to fund the City Loan, there shall be no liens or encumbrances upon the Property having priority over the City Deed of Trust, other than: (a) the deed of trust securing the Bond Loan (b) the Affordable Housing Agreement; (c) the Bond Regulatory Agreement; Cd) the TCAC Regulatory Agreement and (e) those existing non-monetary encumbrances which are disclosed in title reports delivered to City and which have not been objected to by the City in writing. Such priority shall be evidenced by an AL T A lender's insurance policy, including title endorsements reasonably requested by the City with liability equal to the amount of the City Loan, or such other amount as may be mutually agreed to by the parties (the "Lender's Policy") to be issued to City by Borrower to Title Insurer at the close of escrow for the Borrower's acquisition of the Property. Borrower shall be responsible for the cost of the Lender's Policy, which may be paid for from the proceeds of the City Loan. Landings II Loan Agreement 10 7-26 Section 2.11 Subordination: Refinancing. City agrees to take such actions as may be necessary to subordinate the City Deed of Trust to the Bond Loan or any future refmancing(s) thereof; provided, however, that any such subordination to the Bond Loan shall be evidenced by a recorded subordination agreement containing such notice, cure, loan purchase or assumption and Project purchase rights as may be reasonably required by the City in a form to be approved by the City Attorney, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. In no event, shall the City be required to subordinate to debt in excess of that referenced within this Agreement as being senior to the City Deed of Trust. Section 2.12 Conditions to City Obligation. The obligation of City to make and fund the City Loan is subject to the following conditions: (a) This Agreement, the City Note, Deed of Trust, the Declaration, and this Agreement, fully executed by Borrower, shall have been delivered to City and/or its designee along with all other fully executed security documents and instruments provided for herein and/or as required by City and shall have submitted the same into the escrow established for the Borrower's acquisition of the Property. The City Deed of Trust and the Declaration shall be ready to be recorded concurrently with the recording of the grant deed conveying title to the Property to the Borrower as an encumbrance to the Property, subordinate only to the liens securing the Bonds, the Bond Regulatory Agreement and other non monetary encumbrances approved by the City. (b) Borrower shall have acquired fee title to the Property concurrently with the first disbursement of the City Loan. ( c) Borrower has provided and delivered to City at Borrower's sole expense a standard Form AL T A, Lender's Policy of Title Insurance, insuring City's security interest in the Property under the Deed of Trust and in an amount equal to the loan amount set forth in Section 2.2; (d) Legal counsel representing Borrower shall have delivered to City a legal opinion satisfactory in all respects to the City Manager in his/her sole discretion, opining that this Agreement, the City Note, the Declaration, the Deed of Trust and the Security Agreement represent obligations which are valid, binding upon and enforceable against Borrower (subject to (D bankruptcy, insolvency or other laws affecting creditors' rights generally, (ii) application of principles of equity generally, and (iii) laws of the State of California governing obligations secured by a deed of trust or mortgage); ( e) Borrower's certification at the close of escrow that: (i) the City Loan is wholly for the benefit of Borrower, (ii) Borrower is responsible for all obligations created by the City Loan including, without limitation, the repayment of all principal and interest now due and payable or which may become due and payable on the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the City Note, the Deed of Trust, and any other security documents and instruments provided for herein; Landings II Loan Agreement 11 7-27 (f) Borrower's certification at the close of escrow that Borrower shall use the City Loan funds solely for and in connection with the construction and permanent fmancing of the Property and Improvements; (g) Borrower shall have strictly complied with, and performed, all terms and conditions of the documents executed by Borrower in connection with the City Loan; (h) Borrower shall have obtained final funding commitments for the funding of the funds referenced in the Recitals, necessary to complete the Improvements, to the satisfaction of the City; (i) City's approval ofloan documentation for the City Loan; (j) City's approval of Borrower's partnership agreement; (k) City's approval of an ALTA survey of the Property; (I) Borrower has paid or caused to be funded an amount into escrow, which is sufficient to pay for all costs associated with such escrow, including without limitation title fees, escrow fees and closing costs; (m) City's review and approval, in its reasonable discretion, any and all fmancing documents, to be executed by or otherwise to be binding upon City or Borrower in connection with its acquisition of the Property, its construction and operation of the Project and/or its financing thereof including without limitation the Construction Loan and Permanent Loan documents; (n) A construction contract for a stipulated sum for the work at the Property, acceptable to the City's Development Services Director, shall have been executed by the Borrower and the general contractor who has been selected to do the work; (0) To the best of Borrower's knowledge, there are no actions, suits, material claims, legal proceedings, or any other proceedings affecting the Borrower or any parties affiliated ""ith the Borrower, at law or in equity before any court, tribunal, government entity, domestic or foreign, which, if adversely determined, would materially impair the right or ability of Borrower to execute or perform its obligations under this Agreement or any documents required hereby to be executed by Borrower, or which would materially adversely affect the financial condition of the Borrower or any parties affiliated with the Borrower. (P) To the best of Borrower's knowledge, Borrower's execution, delivery, and performance of its obligations under this Agreement will not constitute a default or breach of any contract, agreement, or order to which Borrower or any parties affiliated with Borrower is a party or by which it is bound. (q) No attachment, execution proceedings, assignments for the benefit of creditors, insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization, receivership or other proceedings have been filed or are 12 7-28 Landings II Loan Agreement pending or threatened against the Borrower or any parties affiliated with Borrower, nor are any of such proceedings contemplated by Borrower or any parties affiliated with Borrower. (r) Borrower shall, upon learning of any fact or condition, which would cause any warranties or representations herein not to be true in any material respect, immediately give written notice of such fact or condition to City; and (s) Such other conditions as City shall reasonably request. Section 2.13 Reports and Accounting of Residual Receipts. (a) In connection "vith the annual repayment of the City Loan, commencing upon the Initial Payment Date, the Borrower shall furnish the City with an audited statement duly certified by an independent firm of certified public accountants approved by the City, setting forth in reasonable detail the 'computation, as may be defmed in the City Note, and amount of Residual Receipts during the preceding calendar year. (b) The Borrower shall keep and maintain, in accordance with Section 9.4 hereof, full, complete and appropriate books, records and accounts necessary or prudent to evidence and substantiate in full detail Borrower's calculation of Residual Receipts. All such books, records, and accounts shall be open to and available for inspection by the City, and its auditors or other authorized representatives in accordance with Section 9.4 hereof. (c) Such other and further records and documentation as may be required by the City in its reasonable discretion to verify the amount of the Residual Receipts. ARTICLE 3. HOME Requirements Section 3.1 Requirements. Because the source of the City Loan is funds to be obtained by City from HUD pursuant to the federal government's HOi'vIE Program, Borrower is required to construct and operate the entire Project in compliance with all requirements of the HONIE Program and the HONIE Regulations (24 C.F.R. 92 et seq.) as said regulations may be amended or suspended from time to time, whether or not such requirements are set forth in this Agreement. Section 3.2 Not by way of limitation the foregoing, in compliance with 24 C.F.R 92.504(c), from the Effective Date of this Agreement through the end of the term that the HOi'vIE-assisted units are required to remain affordable pursuant to the HONIE Regulations, Borrower and Developer, as the general partner of the Borrower, shall comply with all of the following requirements: (a) Use of the HOME Funds. HOtvIE funds shall be used only for eligible costs (see, e.g., 24 C.F.R. 92.20, 92.214); all pre-construction and construction activities shall be completed within times referenced in the Schedule of Performance attached hereto, as said times may be extended in accordance \';ith HUD Regulations. Landings II Loan Agreement 13 7-29 (b) Affordabilitv. The HOME-assisted units shall meet the affordability requirements of the HO!'vIE Regulations (24 C.F.R. 92.252), the TCAC Regulatory Agreement (as defined below) or this Agreement or the Bond Regulatory Agreement, whichever is more restrictive. (c) Proiect Requirements. Borrower shall comply with all project requirements set forth in CFR 92. (the HOME Regulations), as applicable in accordance with the type of project assisted, or with the provision of this Agreement, whichever requirements are most restrictive. (d) Housing Oualitv Standard. Borrower shall maintain HOME-assisted units in compliance with applicable Housing Quality Standards and local housing code requirements or the provisions of this Agreement, whichever requirements are more restrictive. (e) Affirmative Marketing. Borrower shall perform those affirmative marketing responsibilities set forth in 24 C.F.R. 92.351 or in the marketing plan described in this Agreement, whichever are more restrictive. (f) Records and Reoorts. In addition to the other provisions of this Agreement, including without limitation Section 2.13 (b )hereof, Borrower shall provide to City all records and reports relating to the Project that may be reasonably requested by City in order to enable it to perform its record keeping and reporting obligations pursuant to Section 92.508 and 92.509 of the HOME Regulations. (g) Enforcement Agreement. In addition to the other provisions set forth herein, City shall have the authority to enforce Borrower's obligation to comply with the HOME Investment Partnership Act Program and the HOME regulations as set forth in this Agreement. (h) Duration of Covenants Regarding HOME-Assisted Units. In accordance with the applicable requirements of 24 Part 92, concerning the term of affordability, the HOME Regulations shall remain in full force and effect for a term of twenty (20) years measured from the effective date of the Declaration, which shall commence upon the timely completion of the Project and timely lease up of the Project as required under the provisions of the TCAC Regulatory Agreement. As used herein, the term of this Agreement shall be the twenty-year term of the affordability restrictions. (i) Housing Oualitv Standards. Borrower represents and warrants that, to the extent the Project assists eligible tenants, that said housing shall be maintained, at all times during the term of the Agreement, in complete compliance with all housing quality standards contained within 24 CFR 92.251. Further, in any housing that is newly constructed or substantially rehabilitated as a result of this Project, Borrower warrants that all construction shall meet or exceed the applicable local codes and construction standards, including zoning and building codes of the City of Chula Vista as well as the provisions of the Model Energy Code published by the County of American Building Officials. Borrower hereby consents to periodic inspection by City's designated inspectors and/or designees during regular business hours, including the Code Enforcement Agents of the City of Chula Vista, to assure compliance with said zoning, building codes, regulations, and housing quality standards. Borrower agrees to comply with the provisions of 24 CFR 92.251, whether or not contained in this Section. 14 7-30 Landings II Loan Agreement G) Limitation of Use of Funds for Religious Purposes. Borrower represents and warrants that it will fully comply with any and all requirements and limitations contained in 24 CFR 92.257, as amended, from time to time. Borrower further represents, warrants and agrees that Project funds will not be used for any purpose proscribed in 24 CFR 92.257, as amended. (k) AnDroval of City Disclosure Statement. This Agreement is subject to approval by the Housing Manager of an executed disclosure statement of Borrower showing the absence of any prohibited conflicts of interest as required by federal law. City's Housing Manager may, in hislher sole discretion, disapprove of said disclosure statement on or before recordation of the Deed of Trust. In the event of such disapproval, this Agreement shall be terminated and of no further force and effect. (I) Administrative Requirements. Borrower shall strictly comply with the administrative requirements contained within 24 CFR Section 92.505, including, but not limited to, the requirements of OMB Circular No. A-87 and the requirements of24 CFR Part 85, Section 85.6, 85.12, 85.20, 85.22, 85.26, 85.32, 85.33, 85.34, 85.36, 85.44, 85.51, and 85.52. Further, Borrower covenants (if it is a nonprofit organization) to comply with the OMB Circular No. A- 122 and the applicable provisions of OMB Circular No. A-110. Copies of said OMB Circulars are on file in the offices of City and are available for inspection and copying by Borrower. Borrower further agrees that should the administrative requirements contained in Section 92.505 be amended and/or changed from time to time by BUD, that Borrower will comply with the terms and conditions of such changed and/or amended administrative requirements. (m) Records and Reports. Borrower shall supply City, annually, on July 1st of each year during the term of this Agreement, v.ith such records and reports as are required and are requested by City to aid it in complying with the reports and record keeping provisions, terms and conditions of 24 CFR 92.508 and 92.509, as amended from time to time, and any and all other requirements of this Agreement. The records and reports include, but are not lin1ited to the following: (1) Amount of funds expended pursuant to this Agreement; (2) Eligible Tenant information, including yearly income verifications; (3) Housing payments charged to resident tenants, to the extent applicable; (4) On-site inspection results; (5) Affirmative marketing records; (6) Insurance policies and notices; (7) Equal Employment Opportunity and Fair Housing records; (8) Labor costs and records; (9) An audited income and expense statement and balance sheets for Borrower; (10) An audited income and expense statement and balance sheets for the Proj ect; (11) A Management Plan for the calendar year in which the report is prepared showing anticipated rental income, other income, expenses, anticipated repairs and replacements Landiilgs II Loan Agreement 15 7-31 to the Project, timing of such repairs and replacements, insurance maintained on behalf of the Project, and such other matters as City shall require, in its sole discretion; (12) Federal and State income tax returns for the calendar year, ending on the preceding December 31 st; (13) Annual analysis of reserves for repair and replacement; (14) Annual certification and representation regarding status of all loans, encumbrances and taxes; (15) Annual statement regarding condition of the Property and disclosing any known defects; (16) An OMB A-133 financial audit; (17) A report or reports, certifying compliance with the terms and provisions of the Section 3 requirements, as set forth in this Agreement and certifying compliance with the provisions of federal law as it relates to Section 3, whether or not specifically set forth herein; and, (18) Such other and further information and records as City andlor HuD shall request in writing from Borrower. [NOTE: As to items (12), (13), and (14), drafts may be initially submitted if the final documents are not available at the stated deadline(s). However, final documents must be submitted when available.] Time is of the essence in supplying each and every report required to be supplied to City. The parties agree that a fee of $25.00 per day shall be paid by Borrower to City for each day that each report is delinquent. The parties agree that multiple fees may be charged at anyone time, depending upon the number of report(s) andlor information that is delinquent. The parties agree that a fee of $25.00 per day, per report andlor information is a reasonable estimation of the damages that will accrue to City as a result of the failure of Borrower to timely submit the required information andlor reports and that said fees shall be treated as liquidated damages by the parties, in anticipation of the damages that will be incurred by City as a result of a breach by Borrower. The parties further agree that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to determine the exact actual amount of damages suffered by City in the event of a breach by Borrower in the reporting requirements of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary contained herein, City shall give Borrower prior written notice of any report andlor information that Borrower has failed to provide City pursuant to this Section and Borrower shall have thirty (30) days to provide such report andlor information to City prior to the assessment of any liquidated damages. (n) Monitoring of Proiect Activities. Borrower agrees to allow City, upon such prior INritten notice and during regular business hours, such reasonable access to review and inspect Borrower's activities under this Agreement as City shall require to perform its monitoring duties under the provisions of 24 CFR Part 92, as amended, from time to time. City shall monitor Borrower's activities without liability for said inspection and review. (0) Federal and State Requirements. Borrower represents, warrants and agrees that it will fully comply, during the term of this Agreement, with any and all HOME requirements 16 7-32 Landings II Loan Agreement including, but not limited to the requirements of 24 CFR Part 92, 24 CFR Section 92.351 (AJnrmative Marketing), 92.352 (Environmental Review), 92.353 (Displacement, Relocation and Acquisition Residential, Antidisplacement and Relocation Plan), 92.354 (Labor), 92.356 (Conflict of Interest), and 92.358 (Flood Insurance). Borrower further warrants, represents and agrees that should said Program requirements be changed by HlJD, from time to time, that Borrower will comply with said changed and amended regulations. Borrower, the general contractor, and any and all subcontractors, shall pay prevailing wages for all work done ",ith respect to the Project to the extent required by Federal and California law. (P) Affirmative Marketing. Borrower shall, at all times during the term of this Agreement, comply ",ith all of the provisions of Section 24 CFR 92.351 and the affmative marketing procedures adopted by City, including, but not limited to, all requirements and procedures referenced in said Section 24 CFR Q2.35 1 (b), amended from time to time. Borrower shall maintain records to verify compliance with the applicable affmative marketing procedures and compliance. Such records are subject to fuspection by City during regular business hours upon written notice from the City to Borrower. (q) Equal Opportunity and Fair Housing Programs. During the term of this Agreement, Borrower agrees as follows: (1) Borrower will not discriminate against any employee, person, or applicant for employment and/or housing because of race, age, sexual orientation, marital status, color, religion, sex, handicap, or national origin. Borrower ,vill take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and/or are housed, and that employees or applicants are treated during employment and/or housing, without regard to their race, age, sexual orientation, marital status, color, religion, sex, handicap, or national origin. Such action shall include, but is not limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or termination; rates of payor other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Borrower agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by City setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (2) Borrower will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees and housing placed by on or behalf of Borrower, state. that all qualified applicants ",ill receive consideration for employment without regard to race, age, sexual orientation, marital status, color, religion, sex, handicap, or national origin. (3) Borrower will cause the foregoing prOVISIOns to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Agreement so that such provisions ",ill be binding upon each subcontractor, provided that the foregoing provision shall not apply to contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies of raw materials. (4) Borrower hereby agrees to comply with the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, the California Fair Employment Practices Act, and any other applicable Federal and State laws and regulations. City will provide technical assistance and copies of the referenced programs upon request. 24 CFR Section 92.350. Landings II Loan Agreement 17 7-33 (5) All activities carried out by Borrower and/or agents of Borrower shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Fair Housing Act. The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 became effective on March 12, 1989. The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, taken together, constitute The Fair Housing Act. The Act provides protection against the following discriminatory housing practices if they are based on race, sex, religion, color, handicap, familial status, or national origin: denying or refusing to rent housing, denying or refusing to sell housing, treating differently applicants for housing, treating residents differently in connection with terms and conditions, advertising a discriminatory housing preference or limitation, providing false information about the availability of housing, harassing, coercing or intimidating people from enjoying or exercising their rights under the Act, blockbusting for profit, persuading owner to sell or rent housing by telling them that people of a particular race, religion, etc. are moving into the neighborhood, imposing different terms for loans for purchasing, constructing, improving, repairing, or maintaining a home, or loans secured by housing; denying use or participation in real estate services, e.g., brokers' organizations, multiple listing services, etc. (6) The Fair Housing Act gives HUD the authority to hold administrative hearings unless one of the parties elects to have the case heard in U.S. District Court and to issue subpoenas. Both civil and criminal penalties are provided. The Act also provides protection for people with disabilities, and proscribes those conditions under which senior citizen housing is exempt from the prohibitions based on familial status. All activities carried out by the Borrower and/or agents of Borrower shall be in accordance with the following provisions of Califomia Law: Fair Employment and Housing Act, Unruh Civil Rights Act of 1959, Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976, and Civil Code Section 54.1. (r) Labor Requirements. Borrower represents and warrants that during the term of this Agreement it will comply with each and every provision and requirement contained within CFR 92.354, as amended from time to time, to the extent applicable, and will pay not less than the wages prevailing in the locality, as predetermined by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a-276a-5), to all laborers and mechanics employed in the development of any part of the Project in accordance with the terms and provisions of CFR 92.354 and will comply with the overtime provisions, as applicable, of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327-332). Prevailing wages need not be paid to "Volunteers" or for "Sweat Equity" as defined in 24 CFR 92.354(b) and (c). Furthermore, Borrower. the general contractor, and any and all subcontractors, shall pay prevailing wages for all work done with respect to the Project to the extent required by Federal and California law. (s) Lead Based Paint. Borrower represents and warrants that during the term of the Agreement that it will comply with each and every provision and requirement contained within CFR 92.355, as amended from time to time, to the extent applicable. (t) Certification Concerning Debarment and Suspension. Borrower represents, warrants and hereby certifies, pursuant to 24 CFR 92.357, that it will not use a contractor that has 18 7-34 Landings II Loan Agreement been debarred and or suspended, nor that is proposed for debaTInent, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from participation in the Project, which is the subject matter of this Agreement. Borrower agrees to execute such further certification(s) required by City and/or BUD including, if necessary, that certification included as Appendix B of CFR Part 24, to verify the certification made in this Section. (u) Flood Insurance. Borrower represents, warrants, and certifies, pursuant to 24 CFR 92.358, that no Real Property which is the subject of this Agreement, is located within a Flood Plain or Flood Hazard Zone or Area, as indicated on a FEMA Map; or that the Real Property is located within a community participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and Borrower agrees to purchase and maintain flood insurance for the duration of the term of this Agreement concerning such Real Property. (v) Fire Protection and Safety Guards. Borrower represents and warrants that it will comply with all requirements and regulations of the Fire Administration Act of 1992 and the Federal Fire and Prevention Control Act. Borrower will use and install all fire and safety related equipment pursuant to the National Fire Protection Association standards. (w) Accessibility Standards. Borrower represents and warrants that it v,ill comply with all federal, state and local requirements and regulations concerning access to the units by the disabled and handicapped persons, including, but not limited to, those requirements of the HOME Program. (x) Section 3 Requirements. Borrower shall comply with the following requirements during the term of the City Loan: (l) The work to be performed under this Agreement is subj ect to the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, 12 U.S.c. Sl701u (Section 3). The purpose of Section 3 is to ensure that employment and other economic opportunities generated by HUD assistance or BUD-assisted projects covered by Section 3, shall, to the greatest extent feasible, be directed to low- and very low-income persons, particularly persons who are recipients of HUD assistance for housing. (2) The parties to this Agreement agree to comply with BUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 135, which implement Section 3. As evidenced by their execution of this Agreement, the parties to this Agreement certify that they are under no contractual or other impediment that would prevent them from complying with the part 135 regulations. (3) Borrower agrees to send to each labor organization or representative of workers with which Borrower has a collective bargaining agreement or other understanding, if any, a notice advising the labor organization or workers' representative of Borrower's commitments under this Section 3 clause, and will post copies of the notice in conspicuous places at the work site where both employees and applicants for training and employment positions can see the notice. The notice shall describe the Section 3 preference, shall set forth minimum number and job titles subject to hire, availability of apprenticeship and training Landings II Loan Agreement 19 7-35 posltIOns, and qualifications for each; and the name and location of the person(s) taking applications for each of the positions; and the anticipated date the work shall begin. (4) Borrower agrees to include this Section 3 clause in every subcontract subject to compliance with regulations in 24 CFR part 135, and agrees to take appropriate action, as provided in an applicable provision of the subcontract or in this Section 3 clause, upon a finding that the subcontractor is in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR part 135. Borrower will not subcontract ""ith any subcontractor where Borrower has notice or knowledge that the subcontractor has been found in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR part 135. (5) Borrower will certify that any vacant employment positions, including trammg positIOns, that are filled (1) after Borrower is selected but before the contract is executed, and (2) with persons other than those to whom the regulations of 24 CFR part 135 require employment opportunities to be directed, were not filled to circumvent Borrower's obligations under 24 CFR part 135. (6) Noncompliance ""ith BUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 135 may result in sanctions, termination of this Agreement for default, and debarment or suspension from future BUD assisted contracts. (y) Drug Free Workolace. Borrower shall comply with all applicable State and Federal rules, laws and regulations to ensure a drug free workplace at all times during the term of this Agreement. Further, Borrower shall incorporate such federal provisions as are required in each contract or subcontract that it enters into in connection with the Project. (z) Lobbving Prohibition. Borrower hereby certifies to City, under penalty of perjury, under the terms of applicable federal law, that at all applicable times before, during and after the term of the Agreement, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement; (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any City, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; (3) Borrower will require that the above stated language be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers, including subcontracts, subgrants, loans, contracts, and cooperative agreements concerning the subject matter of this Agreement; and, Landings II Loan Agreement 20 7-36 (4) Further, Borrower and all subrecipients, at all times, shall certifY compliance with the provisions of 31 U.S.c. S 1352 and any and all terms and conditions of the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment, as amended from time to time. ARTICLE 4. Development Fee Section 4.1 Development Fee. The Developer is entitled to a development fees which may include general overhead and profit, the amount of such development fee shall in no event be greater than the maximum amount permitted pursuant to the Low Income Housing Tax Credit statutes and regulations (the "Development Fee"). It is anticipated that a portion of the Development Fee shall be paid by Borrowet from additional capital contributions to be made by Borrower's Limited Partner pursuant to the terms of the Partnership Agreement, with the balance of the Development Fee (the "Deferred Development Fee") to be paid from the Gross Revenue of the Project and equity contributions to Borrower made after the closing. The Borrower's obligation to pay the Deferred Development Fee shall be evidenced by a promissory note (the "Deferred Development Fee Note") which shall be unsecured. In the event there are any cost savings realized in the construction of the Project, all available funds attributable to such cost savings shall also be applied to the Deferred Development Fee. Regular payments on the . Deferred Development Fee Note shall be made on an annual basis out of the Gross Revenues of the Project. Such amounts shall be paid to Developer on a priority basis to all other debt service on the Property except for the Bond Loan. Developer shall specifically be entitled to payment of the Deferred Development Fee before payment of the amounts due to City pursuant to the City Note. The Deferred Development Fee shall not be secured by any liens upon the property. ARTICLE 5. Development of the Project Section 5.1 Work to be Performed and Completion. Borrower, following recordation of the Deed of Trust and the consummation of the loan; will promptly commence construction of improvements to the Properry so that it consists of a multi-family residential project consisting of 143 units, and to operate the Project for occupancy by very low and low income households, subject to the terms of this Agreement and incorporated herein, the Bond Loan Documents, the . Affordable Housing Agreement, and the TCAC Regulatory Agreement. Construction will continue diligently and v.ithout delay, in a good and workmanlike manner. Borrower will complete such improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by City in connection with issuance of the building permit(s) ("Plans and Specifications"), including any additional specifications prescribed by City, and in compliance v.ith all requirements of governmental authorities having or asserting jurisdiction. Said construction shall be completed on or before December 31, 2011, as referenced in Section 5.9 of this Agreement. Section 5.2 No Material Changes. Borrower shall not make any changes in the Plans and Specifications without City's prior written consent (which consent will not be unreasonably conditioned, delayed or withheld) if such change: (i) constitutes a material change in the building material or equipment specifications, or in the architectural or structural design, value or quality of the Project; or (ii) would adversely affect the structural integrity, quality of building materials, or overall efficiency of operating systems of the Project. Without limiting the above, City agrees that Borrower may make minor changes in the Plans and Specifications without City's prior Landings U Loan Agreement 21 7-37 written consent, provided that such changes do not violate any of the conditions specified herein. Borrower shall at all times maintain, for inspection by City, a full set of working drawings of the Improvements. Section 5.3 Submission of Documents Related to Chan2:es. Borrower shall submit any proposed change to the Plans and Specifications to the City at least ten (10) days prior to the commencement of construction relating to such proposed change whether or not such change is subject to City's consent. Requests for any change that requires consent shall be accompanied by working drawings and a written description of the proposed change, submitted on a change order form acceptable to City, signed by Borrower and, if required by City, also signed by the architect and the contractor. Section 5.4 Compliance with Permits and Laws. Borrower and its contractors shall carry out the development of the Project and operation of the Project in conformity with all applicable laws, regulations, and rules of the govemmental agencies having jurisdiction, including without limitation all legally applicable conditions and requirements of California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 24); all legally applicable prevailing wage requirements, if any, the applicability of which is for Borrower to determine, pursuant to federal and state law, including California Labor Code S 1770 et seq.; all legally applicable conditions and requirements imposed by the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program; all legally applicable labor standards; the legally applicable provisions of the City zoning and development standards, building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical codes, and all other provisions of the City Municipal Code, and all legally applicable disabled and handicapped access requirements, which may include, without limitation, the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.c. Section 12101, et seq., Government Code Section 4450, et seq., Government Code Section 11135, et seq., the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code Section 51, et seq., and the California Building Standards Code, Health and Safety Code Section 18900, et seq., and City policies adopted pursuant to said federal standard regulations and requirements. The work shall proceed only after procurement of each permit, license, or other authorization that may be required under applicable law by any governmental City having jurisdiction, and the Borrower shall be responsible to the City for procurement and maintenance thereof, as may be required of the Borrower and all entities engaged in work on the Project. Section 5.5 Cessation of Work. Once construction has commenced, it shall be continuously and diligently pursued to completion, and shall not be abandoned for a period of fifteen (15) consecutive business days or more, except when due to causes beyond the control and without the fault of Borrower, as set forth in Section 9.3 of this Agreement. If this occurs, the City may, at its option and without notice, declare Borrower to be in default and exercise its rights hereunder. Section 5.6 Mechanics Liens. Stop Notices. and Notices of Completion. (a) Subject to Borrower's right to contest set forth in Section 7.4 of this Agreement, if any claim or lien is filed against the Project or a stop notice affecting the City Loan is served on the City or any other lender or other third party in connection with the Project, then the Borrower shall, within forty-five (45) days after such filing or service, either pay and fully discharge the 22 7-38 Landings II Loan Agreement lien or stop notice, effect the release of such lien or stop notice by delivering to the City a surety bond in sufficient form and amount, or provide the City with other assurance satisfactory to the City that the claim oflien or stop notice will be paid or discharged. (b) If Borrower fails to discharge any lien, encumbrance, charge, or claim in the manner required in Section 5.6 (a), subject to notice and an opportunity to cure as provided in Section 8.1 hereof, then in addition to any other right or remedy, the City may (but shall be under no obligation to) discharge such lien, encumbrance, charge, or claim at the Borrower's expense. Alternately, the City may require the Borrower to immediately deposit with the City or title company the amount necessary to satisfy such lien or claim and any costs pending resolution thereof. The City shall use such deposit to satisfy any claim or lien that is adversely determined against the Borrower. (c) The Borrower shall tile a valid notice of cessation or notice of completion upon cessation of construction on the Project for a continuous period of thirty (30) days or more, and take all other reasonable steps to forestall the assertion of claims of lien against the Project. The Borrower authorizes the City, but without any obligation, to record any notices of completion or cessation of labor, or any other appropriate notice that the City deems necessary or desirable to protect its interest in the Project. Section 5.7 Rirzht to Access. For the purpose of assuring compliance with this Agreement, during the course of the construction, and prior to the completion of the Project, upon 24 hours notice, except in the event of an emergency when no such notice shall be required, City or its agents shall have the right to enter upon said real property and the Improvements during the period of construction. City shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Borrower and Borrower's officers, employees, and agents from any damage caused or liability arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City or their officers, officials, employees, volunteers, agents, or representatives in their exercise of this right of access; provided that it is understood that City does not by this Section assume any responsibility or liability for a negligent inspection or failure to inspect. Any inspection by City pursuant to this section shall be conducted so as not to interfere or impede the construction or operations of the Project. Section 5.8 Progress Reports. Borrower shall keep City informed of the progress of the construction on the Property and, if requested, shall provide City with monthly written progress reports and meet with City staff as appropriate. If requested, Borrower shall fumish a construction schedule to City indicating completion dates for each portion of work showing progress toward completion of the Project. Section 5.9 Certificate ofOccupancv. All construction of the Improvements, as approved by City, shall be completed by Borrower to the satisfaction of City and "Placed in Service" as that term is used in the Internal Revenue Code, on or before December 31, 2011. Time is of the essence in the completion of the Improvements; failure to comply with these requirements shall constitute a material default under the terms of this Agreement. Completion of the Improvements shall occur upon the filing or the issuance by the building official of the City of Chula Vista of a temporary Certificate of Occupancy for all units at the Property. Landings n Loan Agreement 23 7-39 Section 5.10 Estoppels. At the request of Borrower or any holder of a mortgage or deed of trust, City shall, from time to time and upon the request of Borrower or such holder, timely execute and deliver to Borrower or such holder a written statement of City that no default or breach exists (or would exist with the passage of time, or giving of notice, or both) by Borrower under this Agreement, the City Note, the City Deed of Trust, and/or the Affordable Housing Agreement, if such be the case, and certifying as to whether or not Borrower has at the date of such certification complied with any obligation of Borrower hereunder or under such of those documents as to which such holder may inquire. The form of any estoppel letter shall be prepared by the holder or Borrower. ARTICLE 6. Uses of the Property Section 6.1 Summary. Borrower covenants and agrees for itself and its successors and assigns to its interest in the Property that Borrower and such successors and assigns shall devote the Property to uses consistent with California Community Redevelopment Law, the Bond Loan Documents, the Regulatory Agreement, The TCAC Regulatory Agreement, the Affordable Housing Agreement, the City Deed of Trust, and this Agreement, whichever is most restrictive, for a period ending fifty-five (55) years from the date of the City's issuance of the fmal Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, provided, however, the HOME affordability restrictions shall only be effective for a term of twenty years after their effective date as referenced in the Declaration. City shall be a third-party beneficiary under the Regulatory Agreement, the Bond Regulatory Agreement, and the TCAC Regulatory Agreement. ln addition, the Redevelopment City shall have the authority to enforce any and all of such agreements, in addition, to the right of the City to enforce said agreements, and shall have full authority to enforce any breach or default by Borrower under such agreement in the same marmer as though it were a breach or default hereunder. Without City's prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, Borrower shall not consent to any amendment of or modification to the TCAC Regulatory Agreement or Bond Regulatory Agreement which (i) shortens the term of the affordability restrictions on the units in the Project to a term of less than fifty-five (55) years after the date of the City's issuance of the fmal Certificate of Occupancy for the Project or (ii) modifies the number of units required to be rented at affordable housing costs to persons of specified incomes; provided, however, that any such amendment shall not modify the Borrower's obligations under this Agreement or the Affordable Housing Agreement. Section 6.2 Affordable Housing. Borrower covenants and agrees for itself and its successors and assigns to its interest in the Property that commencing upon the completion of the Project and continuing thereafter for a period of fifty-five (55) years from the date of the City's issuance of the fmal Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, Borrower and such successors and assigns shall devote one hundred forty two (142) residential units on the Property (hereinafter the "Restricted Units") to its continuous use as affordable rental housing for very low and low income households in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, and one unit may be occupied by the on-site property manager, subject to the occupancy restrictions contained in this Section. Eleven (11) HOME Restricted Units shall be made available to very low income households at or below 50 percent of the Area Median Income ("AMI"), at affordable rents for the twenty (20)year term, as referenced within the Declaration, which shall be in a form and format as approved by the City Attorney, in hislher reasonable discretion. 24 7-40 Landings II Loan Agreement Section 6.3 Execution of Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions. Borrower agrees to execute the Declaration and to cause it to be recorded, assuring compliance \Vith the affordability provisions of this Agreement. Borrower agrees to obtain any and all subordination agreements, if any, necessary to insure that the Declaration is an encumbrance on the Property prior to all other encumbrances, liens and taxes. Such subordinations shall be on terms and conditions acceptable to the City's Director of Development Services in his/her sole discretion. The Declaration shall be binding and enforceable against all heirs, successors and assigns of Borrower. Section 6.4 Cross-Default With the Declaration. Borrower and its successors in interest to the Property shall strictly comply v"ith all of the terms and conditions of the Declaration. Any default under the Declaration shall be a default under this Agreement, the City Note and the Deed of Trust. Section 6.5 Reports. Borrower, at its expense, shall submit, or cause tt'1e Property Manager to submit, to the appropriate entities any and all reports required to be submitted pursuant to Federal Regulations. Section 6.6 Subordination of Affordabilitv Covenants. In the event that the City finds that an economically feasible method of fmancing for the construction and operation of the Project, without the subordination of the affordable housing covenants as may be set forth in this Agreement, is not reasonably available, the City shall make the affordable housing covenants set forth in this Agreement junior and subordinate to the deeds of trust and other documents required in connection with the construction and permanent financing for the Project approved pursuant to this Agreement. Any other subordination agreement entered into by the City shall contain written commitments which the City finds are reasonably designed to protect City's investment in the event of default, such as any of the following: (a) a right of City to cure a default on the loan prior to foreclosure, (b) a right of City to negotiate with the lender after notice of default from the lender and prior to foreclosure, (c) an agreement that if prior to foreclosure of the loan, City takes title to the property and cures the default on the loan, the lender will not exercise any right it may have to accelerate the loan by reason of the transfer of title to City, and (d) a right of City to reacquire the Property from the Borrower at any time after a material default on the loan. Section 6.7 No Conversion to Condominiums. Borrower agrees that Borrower shall not, and shall not allow any other person to, during the term of the Declaration, cause all or any portion of the Property to be converted to condominiums or to otheoose allow a condominium map or condominium plan to be recorded or filed against all or any portion of the Property. Borrower further agrees that the conversion of all or any portion of the Property to condominiums and/or the recordation or filing of a condominium map or condominium plan against all or any portion of the Property during the term of the Declaration, shall be a breach of this Agreement, the City Loan, the Declaration, the City Note and the Deed of Trust, entitling the City to immediately exercise any and all of its rights and remedies under this Agreement, the City Loan, the Declaration, the City Note and the Deed of Trust, including v.ithout limitation acceleration of the City Note and foreclosure under the Deed of Trust. Landings II Loan Agreement 25 7-41 Section 6.8 Condition of the Propertv. (a) Borrower hereby represents that to the best of its knowledge, except as otherwise disclosed to the City in writing, it is not aware of and has not received any notice or communication from any government entity having jurisdiction over the Property notifying Borrower of the presence of surface or subsurface zone Hazardous Materials in, on, or under the Property, or any portion thereof. "Best knowledge," as used herein, shall mean the actual knowledge of the Borrower and its officers, directors and employees, as based upon the documents and materials. in the possession of Borrower, and its officers, directors and employees, including the site investigation report or study referred to in Section 6.8 (b) herein. (b) In addition to the foregoing, the Borrower has, at its sole cost and expense, engaged its own environmental consultant to conduct a Phase I investigation of the Property and produce a report thereof, a copy of which has been provided to the City by Borrower. Such report concludes that no Hazardous Materials have been detected on the Property. (c) Borrower shall take all necessary precautions to prevent the release into the environment of any Hazardous Materials which may be located in, on or under the Property. Such precautions shall include compliance with all Governmental Requirements with respect to Hazardous Materials. In addition, Borrower shall install and utilize such equipment and implement and adhere to such procedures as are consistent with commercially reasonable standards as respects the disclosure, storage, use, removal and disposal of Hazardous Materials. (d) Borrower shall indemnify, defend and hold City harmless from and against any claim, action, suit, proceeding, loss, cost, damage, liability, deficiency, fine, penalty, punitive damage, or expense (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees), resulting from, arising out of, or based upon (i) the release, use, generation, discharge, storage or disposal of any Hazardous Materials on, under, in or about, or the transportation of any such Hazardous Materials to or from, the Property, no matter when such claim, action, suit or proceeding is first asserted or begun and no matter how the Hazardous Materials came to be released, used, generated, discharged, stored or disposed of on, under, in or about, to or from the Property, or by whom or how they are discovered (except for such damages which arise after the transfer of the Property pursuant to foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure), or (ii) the violation, or alleged violation, of any statute, ordinance, order, rule, regulation, permit, judgment or license relating to the use, generation, release, discharge, storage, disposal or transportation of Hazardous Materials on, under, in or about, to or from, the Property. This indemnity shall include, without limitation, any damage, liability, fme, penalty, parallel indemnity after closing, cost or expense arising from or out of any claim, action, suit or proceeding, including injunctive, mandamus, equity or action at law, for personal injury (including sickness, disease or death), tangible or intangible property damage, compensation for lost wages, business income, profits or other economic loss, damage to the natural resource or the environment, nuisance, contamination, leak, spill, release or other adverse effect on the environme'nt. (e) For purposes of this Agreement, "Hazardous Materials" means any substance, material, or waste which is or becomes regulated by any local governmental authority, San Diego County, the State of California, regional governmental authority, or the United States Landings U Loan Agreement 26 7-42 Government, including, but not limited to, any material or substance which is (i) defmed as a "hazardous waste," "extremely hazardous waste," or "restricted hazardous waste" under Section 25115, 25117 or 25122.7, or listed pursuant to Section 25130 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5 (Hazardous Waste Control Law)), (ii) defmed as a "hazardous substance" under Section 25316 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.8 (Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act), (iii) defmed as a "hazardous material," "haiardous substance," or "hazardous waste" under Section 25501 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95 (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory), (iv) defined as a "hazardous substance" under Section 25281 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.7 (Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances), (v) petroleum, (vi) friable asbestos, (vii) polychlorinated byphenyls, (viii) methyl tertiary butyl ether, (ix) listed under Article 9 or defmed as "hazardous" or "extremely hazardous" pursuant to Article 11 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations, Division 4, Chapter 20, (x) designated as "hazardous substances" pursuant to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 91317), (xi) defmed as a "hazardous waste" pursuant to Section 1004 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 96901, et seq. (42 U.S.c. 96903) or (xii) defined as "hazardous substances" pursuant to Section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 99601, et seq. The term hazardous materials shall not include any material in such quantities as are commonly used in the development, construction, operation and/or occupancy of a multifamily housing project. Section 6.9 Maintenance of Propertv. Borrower agrees for itself and its successors in interest to all or any portion of the Property, to maintain the Improvements on the Property in conformity 'With applicable provisions of the City Municipal Code, and shall keep the Property free from any accumulation of debris or waste materials. During such period, the Borrower shall also maintain the landscaping planted on the Property in a healthy condition. If at any time Borrower fails to maintain the Property and such condition is not corrected within ten days after written notice from City 'With respect to graffiti, debris, waste material, and general maintenance, or thirty days after written notice from City 'With respect to landscaping and building improvements, then City, in addition to whatever remedy it may have at law or at equity, but subject to the rights of the Bond lssuer/Lender. shall have the right to enter upon the applicable portion of the Property and perform all acts and work necessary to protect, maintain, and preserve the Improvements and landscaped areas on the Property, and to attach a lien upon the Property, or to assess the Property, in the amount of the expenditures arising from such acts and work of protection, maintenance, and preservation by City and/or costs of such cure, including a fifteen percent (15%) administrative charge, which amount shall be treated as an additional loan hereunder payable pursuant to the terms of the Partnership Agreement. Section 6.10 Propertv Management. The parties acknowledge that the City is intere.sted in the long term management and operation of the Property and in the qualifications of any person or entity retained by the Borrower for that purpose (the "Property Manager"). Therefore, during the period of the effectiveness of the affordability covenants set forth herein, the City may from time to time review and evaluate the identity and performance of the Property Manager as it reasonably deems appropriate. At all times during the term of the Declaration, if the City serves a thirty (30) day written notice of deficiencies in the property management for the Property, or default under the Declaration or any document executed in conjunction here'With, - which deficiencies or default have not been rectified by Borrower, 'Within the thirty (30) day period Landings II Loan Agreement 27 7-43 (unless such deficiency or default is not capable of being cured within such thirty (30) day period, then such amount of time as City determines is needed, not to exceed ninety (90) days, provided Borrower commences cure within thirty (30) day period and continues to diligently pursue cure), then, City shall have the right, but not the duty, in its sole discretion and upon such thirty (30) days written notice: (i) to require the retention of a professional property management firm to manage the Property; (ii) to approve, in advance and in writing, the retention of any such property management firm, including the terms of the contract governing such retention; and (iii) to require Borrower to terminate any such property management firm, provided that such termination shall comply with the termination provisions of the management contract in question. Borrower shall cooperate with City to effectuate City's rights. In addition, the Borrower shall maintain a detailed "Management Plan" which sets forth in reasonable detail the duties of the Property Manager, the tenant selection process, a security system and crime prevention program, the procedures for the collection of rent, the procedures for monitoring of occupancy levels, the procedures for eviction of tenants, the rules and regulations of the Property and manner of enforcement, a standard lease form, and other matters relevant to the management of the Property subject, however, to any requirements of the Bond IssuerlLender pursuant to the Bond Loan Documents and reasonably approved by the City. The management plan shall require the Property Manager to adhere to a fair lease and grievance procedure and provide a plan for tenant participation in management decisions. The management of the Property shall be in compliance with the Management Plan. The Management Plan may be revised from time to time upon the approval of the City and the Borrower. Section 6.11 Affordable Housin~ Agreement. Certain requirements with respect to the affordable housing obligations and other operational and maintenance obligations of the Project are set forth in the Affordable Housing Agreement, as amended and as approved by the office of the City Attorney, in its reasonable discretion. The execution and recordation qf the Affordable Housing Agreement is a condition precedent to the disbursement of the City Loan, as set forth in Section 2.12 hereof. ARTICLE 7. Continuing Obligations of Borrower Section 7.1 Applicabilitv. For the entire term of the requirements set forth hereof, the Borrower shall comply 'With the provisions of this Article. Section 7.2 Insurance. Borrower, at its sole cost and expense, shall purchase and maintain public liability, auto liability and property damage insurance with limits of not less than a project specific $2,000,000.00 per occurrence, combined single limit with four million Dollar ($4,000,000) in the aggregate for injury to or death of one or more persons and/or property damage arising out of a single accident or occurrence, insuring against any and all liability of City, the City of Chula Vista, and their employees, Borrower, its contractors, employees, agents, subcontractors and its authorized representatives, arising out of or in connection with Borrower's activities at the Property. All public liability insurance and property damage insurance shall insure the performance of Borrower of the indemnity provisions set forth in this Agreement. Further, in all such insurance required to be purchased and maintained by Borrower, City, its City and its Housing Authority shall be named as an additional insured, Borrowers coverage to 28 7-44 Landings II Loan Agreement be primary; Liability Additional Insured Endorsement must not exclude Completed Operations and policy to provide ten year extended reporting period, and the policy shall contain cross- liability endorsements. Borrower further agrees to purchase and maintain in full force and affect such policies of worker's compensation insurance as may be required to cover all employees of Borrower during the term of this Agreement, in a form and amount acceptable to City. Further, Borrower shall maintain policies of insurance as referenced in Exhibit "B" to this Agreement throughout the term of the City Loan and for the duration of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. Certificates of Insurance acceptable to City shall be filed with City prior to funding of the City Loan. These insurance requirements may be waived, in writing, in advance, by the City's Director of Development Services on a case by case basis. The insurance requirements contained in this section shall not be construed to limit the Borrower's obligations under this Agreement, including without limitation any indemnities. Section 7.3 Proceeds of Insurance. Should the Project be totally or partially destroyed or rendered wholly or partly uninhabitable by fire or other casualty required to be insured against by Borrower, Borrower shall promptly proceed to obtain insurance proceeds and take all steps necessary to promptly and diligently commence the repair or replacement of the Project to substantially the same condition as the Project is required to be maintained in pursuant to this Agreement if (i) the Borrower agrees in writing within ninety (90) days after payment of the proceeds that such repair or rebuilding is economically feasible, and (ii) the Bond Issuer/Lender permit such repair or rebuilding, provided that the extent of Borrower's obligation to restore the Project shall be limited to the amount of the insurance proceeds actually received by the Borrower. If the Borrower is unable or is not permitted to repair, replace, or restore the Project, Borrower must give notice to City (in which event Borrower will be entitled to all insurance proceeds, subject to any outstanding lien obligations, but Borrower shall be required to remove all debris from the Property) and Borrower may construct such other improvements on the Property as are consistent with applicable land use regulations approved by the City and the other governmental agencies with jurisdiction. Section 7.4 Taxes. Assessments. Encumbrances. and Liens. Borrower shall pay prior to delinquency all real estate ta.xes and assessments properly assessed and levied on the Property. Until the payment in full of all amounts ov.ing under the City Note, Borrower shall not place or allow to be placed thereon any mortgage, trust deed, encumbrance, or lien (except mechanic's liens prior to suit to foreclose the same being filed) not authorized by this Agreement, without the City's consent, which consent shall not unreasonably be withheld. Borrower shall remove or have removed any levy or attachment made on the Property, or assure the satisfaction thereof, within a reasonable time, but in any event prior to a sale thereunder. Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to prohibit Borrower from contesting the validity or amounts of any tax, assessment, encumbrance, or lien, nor to limit the remedies available to Borrower in respect thereto. Section 7.5 Hold Harmless. Borrower agrees to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its Redevelopment Agency, and its Housing Authority, and its officers, agents, employees, representatives and successors, from and against any and all claims, damages, actions, costs, demands, expenses or liability, including without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and court Landings II Loan Agreement 29 7-45 costs, which may arise from the direct or indirect actions or inactions of the Borrower or those of its contractors, sub-contractors, agents, employees or other persons acting on Borrower's behalf which relate to the Property or Project; excluding, however, from Borrower's indemnity any such liability, losses, damages (including foreseeable or unforeseeable consequential damages), penalties, fmes, expenses (including out-of-pocket litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees) directly or indirectly arising out of the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of City, its Redevelopment Agency, and its Housing Authority or its employees, contractors, subcontractors or agents. This hold harmless agreement applies, without limitation, to all damages and claims for damages suffered or alleged to have been suffered by reasons of the operations referred to in this paragraph, regardless of whether or not the City, its Redevelopment Agency, or its Housing Authority prepared, supplied or approved plans or specifications, or both, for the Property or Project. This indemnity by Borrower, and all other indemnities set forth herein shall survive any foreclosure of the Property by the City pursuant to the terms of the City Deed of Trus!. Section 7.6 Further Indemnification of City. It is understood and agreed that the parties hereto have entered this Agreement as a method of providing necessary assistance to Borrower in connection with the construction of low and moderate income housing and development of the Property pursuant to all applicable laws and that by contributing public funds to assist in the accomplishment of such development, or by otherwise contributing or assisting with the accomplishment of such development, the City assumes no responsibility for insuring that the same is adequately undertaken (including, without limitation, the existence and/or remediation of any hazardous or toxic substances on the Property) and as a material consideration to City for entering into this Agreement (and not by way of limiting the generality of Section 7.5 above) Borrower agrees to indemnify, protect, defend and hold hannless City, its Redevelopment Agency, and its Housing Authority and its representatives, officers, employees and their respective successors from and against any and all claims, damages, actions, demands, liabilities, obligations, expenses, losses or costs, including without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs, which may arise out of or are in any manner connected with the development of the Project pursuant to this Agreement; excluding, however, from Borrower's indemnity any such liability, losses, damages (including foreseeable or unforeseeable consequential damages), penalties, fines, expenses (including out-of-pocket litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees) directly or indirectly arising out of the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of City, its Redevelopment Agency, and its Housing Authority or its employees, contractors, subcontractors or agents. Section 7.7 Obligation to Refrain from Discrimination. There shall be no discrimination against, or segregation of, any persons, or group of persons, on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, or national origin in the enj oyment of the Property, nor shall Borrower itself, or any person claiming under or through it, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sub lessees, or vendees of the Property or any portion thereof. Borrower shall further comply with all the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. City acknowledges that, pursuant to the restrictions of the Farmworker Grant, Borrower is required to use status as an agricultural worker as a basis of tenant selection. 30 7-46 Landings II Loan Agreement - Section 7.8 Form of Nondiscrimination and Nonsegregation Clauses. Borrower shall refrain from restricting the rental, sale, or lease of any portion of the Property, or contracts relating to the Property, on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, or national origin of any person and shall comply with all the applicable requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. All such deeds, leases or contracts, shall contain or be subject to substantially the following nondiscrimination or nonsegregation clauses: (a) In deeds. "The grantee herein covenants by and. for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, or national origin in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the land herein conveyed, nor shall the grantee himself, or any persons claiming under or through him, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subt~nants, sub lessees, or vendees in the land herein conveyed and further covenants that all such individuals and entities shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as the same may be amended from time to time (42 USe. S12101, et seq.). The foregoing covenants shall run with the land." (b) In leases. "The lessee herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through him, and this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conditions: 'That there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, or national origin in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the land herein leased, nor shall the lessee himself, or any person claiming under or through him, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants, or vendees in the land herein lease and the lease shall be carried out in compliance with all applicable requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as the same may be amended from time to time (42 U.S.C. S12101, et seq.)'" (c) In contracts: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any persons or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, or national origin in the sale, lease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of land, nor shall the transferee himself, or any person claiming under or through him, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees, or vendees of land and all such activities shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable requirements of the Americans 'With Disabilities Act of 1990, as the same may be amended from time to time (42 U.S.C. S12101, et seq.)." Section 7.9 Effect of Covenants. Unless sooner terminated by City as provided for herein, all covenants contained in this Article shall run with the land and shall be extinguished and of no further force and effect upon the fifty-fifth anniversary of the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the Project by the City, with the exception of the non-discrimination and non- Landings II Loan Agreement 31 7-47 segregation covenants which shall run in perpetuity. The covenants established herein shall, without regard to technical classification and designation, be binding on the part of Borrower and any successors and assigns to the Property or any part thereof, and the tenants, lessees, sub lessees and occupants of the Property, for the benefit of and in favor of the Property and the City, and its successors and assigns and any successor in interest thereto. City is deemed the beneficiary of such covenants for and in its O'-"TI right and for the purposes of protecting the interest of the community and other parties, public or private, in whose favor and for whose benefit of such covenants running with the land have been provided, without regard to whether City has been, remained, or is the owner of any particular land or interest therein. City shall have the right to unilaterally terminate the covenants at any time (subject to the TCAC Regulatory Agreement) or, if such covenants are breached. (subject to any cure rights provided herein) to exercise all rights and remedies and to maintain any actions or suits at law or in equity or other proper proceedings to enforce the curing of such breaches to which it or any other beneficiaries of this Agreement and the covenants may be entitled, including specific performance (it being recognized that the breach of such covenants cannot be adequately compensated by monetary damages), and any and all remedies provided in the City Deed of Trust and City Note, including, without limitation, foreclosure proceedings against the Property. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in the event that there is a breach of the terms of this Agreement or any covenants provided herein, the City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to take any and all actions the City deems necessary to cure such breach, including, without limitation, taking possession of the Property for management and/or repair purposes, and to obtain reimbursement from Borrower for any reasonable costs incurred by the City in the exercise of such remedy. Furthermore, Borrower hereby covenants by and for itself, its successors and assigns and every person acquiring an interest in the Property, or any part thereof, that City and other public agencies at their sole risk and expense, and subject to the rights of tenants in possession, shall have the right to enter the Property or any part thereof at all reasonable times and with as little interference as possible for the purposes of construction, reconstruction, maintenance, repair or service of any public improvements or public facilities located on the Property and to ensure compliance with the restrictions and covenants contained herein. Any such entry shall be made only after reasonable notice to Borrower and, any damage or injury to the Property resulting from such entry shall be promptly repaired at the sole expense of the public City responsible for the entry except to the extent any such damage or injury arises as a result of the negligence or willful misconduct of the Borrower or its officers, employees, agents, invitees or contractors. No violation or breach of the covenants, conditions, restrictions, provisions or limitations contained in this Agreement shall defeat or render invalid or in any way impair the lien or charge of any mortgage, deed of trust or other financing or security instrument; provided, however, that any successor of Borrower to the Property shall be bound by such remaining covenants, conditions, restrictions, limitations and provisions, whether such successor's title was acquired by foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, trustee's sale or otherwise. Failure to comply with the covenants, conditions, restrictions, provisions or the limitation contained in this Agreement within the time period required by Section 8.1 shall constitute a material default hereunder permitting the City to exercise any of its rights or obligations provided hereunder, including, without limitation, those provided under the City Note, City Deed of Trust, or otherwise provided at law or in equity. '0 ,- Landings II Loan Agreement 7-48 Section 7. I 0 Prohibition Against Assignment and Transfer. The qualifications and identity of Borrower are of particular concern to City. It is because of those qualifications and identity that City has entered into this Agreement with Borrower. Accordingly, for the term of the City Loan and Affordable Housing Agreement, Borrower, without City's prior written approval, shall not, whether voluntarily, involuntarily, or by operation of law, and except as permitted in this Section, (I) undergo any significant change in ownership (including the sale or conveyance of any of the general pannership interests in the Borrower, except as otherwise pennitted under the terms of the Partnership Agreement regarding the removal of the General Partner, provided that any replacement General Partner shall be subject to the reasonable approval of the City, or (2) assign all or any part of this Agreement or any rights hereunder, or (3) sell, lease, assign, further encumber or ref mance, or otherwise convey all or any part of the Property or Project, whether voluntarily, involuntarily, or by operation of law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following shall not be considered a significant change in ownership or an assignment or transfer and shall not require City approval for purposes of this Section 7.10: (a) Transfers to any entity or entities wholly owned and controlled by Borrower or all of its partners. (b) The conveyance or dedication of portions of the Property to the City or other appropriate governmental entity for the formation of an assessment district, or the granting of easements or pennits to facilitate the development of the Property. (c) Borrower. A sale or transfer of some or all of the limited partnership interests m the (d) business. The leasing of all or any apartment units to tenants in the ordinary course of (e) The leasing of furniture, fixtures or equipment in the ordinary course of business, including, without limitation, laundry equipment and facilities, cable television equipment and facilities, and vending machine equipment and facilities. (I) Transfers of property management responsibilities in accordance with Section 6. I 0 hereof, provided, however, that Borrower shall provide City thirty (30) days prior written notice of any such management change, and that this exception shall be limited to transfers to property managers with significant experience in managing projects similar to the Project. (g) The conveyance of the Property to the nonprofit general partner of ihe Borrower upon such general partner's exercise of its right of first refusal to acquire the Property at the end of the tax credit compliance period. (h) Any such assignee shall be subject to all terms and conditions of this Agreement, including, without limitation, all affordabiIity restrictions concerning the occupancy of the Property . Landings II Loan Agreement 33 7-49 (i) Borrower shall deliver written notice to City requesting approval of any assignment or transfer requiring City approval hereunder. Such notice shall be given prior to Borrower entering into a formal written agreement with the proposed assignee. (j) In considering whether it will grant approval to any assignment by Borrower of its interest in the Property or any portion thereof, which assignment requires City approval, City shall consider factors such as (i) the fmancial strength and capability of the proposed assignee to perform Borrower's obligations hereunder and (ii) the proposed assignee's experience and expertise in the planning, fmancing, construction, development, and operation of similar projects. (k) No assignment, including assignments which do not require City approval hereunder, but excluding assignments for ftnancing purposes, shall be effective unless and until the proposed assignee executes and delivers to City an agreement, in form satisfactory to the City's attorneys, assuming the obligations of the assignor which have been assigned. Thereafter, the assignor shall be relieved of all responsibility to City for performance of the obligations assumed by the assignee. (1) No lender approved by City shall be required to execute an assumption agreement and such lender's rights and obligations hereunder shall be as set forth in Section 7.10. Section 7.11 Secured Financing: Right of Holders. (a) Permitted Encumbrances. Mortgages, deeds of trust, conveyances, and leases- back or any other form of conveyance required for any fmancing permitted and/or approved by the City hereof are permitted before City's issuance of the Certiftcate of Occupancy. (b) Holder Not Obligated to Construct Improvements. The holder of any mortgage or deed of trust or other security interest authorized by this Agreement shall in no way be obligated by the provisions of this Agreement to construct or complete the Improvements or to guarantee such construction or completion; provided, however, that nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to permit or authorize any such holder (with the exception of the holder of any deed of trust securing the loan made from the proceeds of the Bonds) to devote the Property or any part thereof to any uses, or to construct any improvements thereon, other than those uses or improvements provided for or authorized by this Agreement. (c) Notice of Default to Mortgage. Deed of Trust or Other Secured Instrument Holders: Right to Cure. Whenever City shall deliver any notice or demand to Borrower with respect to any breach or default by Borrower hereof, the City shall at the same time deliver a copy of such notice or demand to Borrower's Limited Partner and each approved holder of record of any mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument which has previously requested such notice in writing. Each such holder shall (insofar as the rights of City are concerned) have the right, at its option ",ithin ninety (90) days after the receipt for the notice, to commence and thereafter to diligently proceed to cure or remedy such default and add the cost thereof to the security interest debt and the lien on its security interest. (d) Right of City to Cure Mortgage. Deed of Trust. or Other Security Instrument Default. In the event of a default or breach by Borrower of a mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument or lease-back or conveyance for fmancing prior to the issuance by City of the 34 7-50 Landings II Loan Agreement Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, City may cure the default prior to completion of any foreclosure. In such event, the City shall be entitled to reimbursement from Borrower of all costs and expenses it has reasonably incurred in curing the default, which right of reimbursement shall be secured by a lien upon the Property to the e>"tent of such costs and disbursements. Any such lien shall be subject to: (l) i\ny mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument or sale and lease- back or other conveyance for flllancing permined by this Agreement; or (2) Any rights or interests provided in this Agreement for the protection of the holders of such mortgages, deed of trust, or other security instruments, the lessor under a sale and lease-back, or the grantee under such other conveyance for financing; provided that nothing herein shall be deemed to impose upon City any affirmative obligations (by the payment of money, construction, or otherwise) with respect to the Property in the event of its enforcement of its lien. (e) Right of Citv to Satisfy Liens. Prior to the issuance by City of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, and after Borrower has had a reasonable time to challenge, cure, or satisfy any liens or encumbrances on the Property, City, after sixty (60) days prior written notice to Borrower, shall have the right, but not the obligation, to satisfy any liens or encumbrances on the Property; provided, however, that nothing in this Agreement shall require Borrower to payor make provision for the payment of any tax, assessment, lien, or charge so long as Borrower in good faith shall contest the validity or amount thereof, and so long as such delay in payment shall not subject the Property to forfeiture or sale. ARTICLE 8. Defaults, Remedies, And Termination Section 8.1 Defaults - General. Subject to all of the extensions of time available in Section 9.3, failure or delay by any party to perform any term or provision of this Agreement constitutes a default uD.der this Agreement; however, the party shall not be deemed to be in default if (i) such party cures, corrects, or remedies such default within thirty (30) days after receipt of a notice specifying such failure or delay, or (ii) for such defaults that cannot reasonably be cured, corrected, or remedied within thirty. (30) days, if such party commences to cure, correct, or remedy such failure or delay within thirty (30) days after receipt of a notice. specifying such failure or delay, and diligently prosecutes such cure, correction or remedy to completion. The injured party shall give written notice of default to the party in default, specifying the default complained of by the injured party. Copies of any notice of default given to Borrower shall also be delivered to the Bond Issuer/Lender, the Limited Partner of Borrower, and any other perrnined lender requesting such notice. Except as provided in Section 8.3 herein or as required to protect against further damages, the injured party may not institute proceedings against the party in default until thirty (30) days after giving such notice. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, any failure or delay in giving such notice or in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not constitute a waiver of any default, nor shall it change the time of default, nor shall it deprive either party of its rights to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies. Landings II Loan Agreement 35 7-51 Section 8.2 Termination. (a) Termination bv City. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, in the event that the City is not in default under this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement prior to disbursement of the City Loan upon written notice to the Borrower if: (i) Borrower commits a material default hereunder and fails to cure said default within the time specified in Section 8.1 hereof; or (ii) Borrower fails to obtain the necessary approvals from the Tax Credit Allocation Committee for an allocation of "4%" Low Income Housing Tax Credits under terms that will restrict the residential units in the Project to the requirements set forth herein; (iii) Borrower fails to timely remove any and all other requirements of Section 2.12 of this Agreement; or (iv) Escrow has not closed on the conveyance of the Property to Borrower on or before December 31, 2009, as such date may be extended by agreement of all the parties hereto in their sole and absolute discretion; or (v) Subject to extensions of time made pursuant to Section 9.3 hereof, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement with prior written notice Borrower, if Borrower shall have failed to commence construction of the Project pursuant to a valid building permit or permits and is not diligently proceeding with such construction as determined under the reasonable and sole discretion of City and does not timely cure such default. In addition, in the event of Borrower's uncured material default under this Agreement at the time City exercises its right under this Section 8.2 to terminate the Agreement, nothing in this Section 8.2 is intended or shall be interpreted as a limitation of any other legal or equitable rights to which City may be entitled. ' In addition to the right of the City to terminate this Agreement prior to disbursement of funds by the City, the City shall have the right to pursue any and all rights, at law or in equity, against the Borrower for breach of the Agreement, including without limitation, the recoupment of monies disbursed by the City together with any and all other damages incurred by the City as a result of the uncured breach by the Borrower, including attorney's fees, expert witnesses fees, consultant fees and other fees, costs, expenses and damages. (b) Termination bv Borrower. Notwithstanding any other prOVISIOn of this Agreement to the contrary, provided that Borrower is not in default under this Agreement, Borrower shall have the right to terminate this Agreement prior to disbursement of the City Loan, upon written notice to City, if: (i) City commits a material default hereunder and fails to cure said default within the time specified in Section 8.1; or (ii) Escrow has not closed on the conveyance of the Property to Borrower on or before December 31, 2009, as such date may be extended by agreement of all the parties hereto, in their sole and absolute discretion; or (iii) City fails to approve, after best efforts by Borrower to obtain such approval, such permits as are required to commence and complete construction of the Project on the Property. In addition, in the event of City's uncured material default under this Agreement at the time Borrower exercises its right under this Section 8.2 to terminate the Agreement, nothing in this Section 8.2 is intended or shall be interpreted as a limitation of any other legal or equitable rights to which Borrower mav be entitled. . 36 7-52 Landings II Loan Agreement Section 8.3 Leilal Actions. (a) Institution of Leilal Actions. In addition to any other rights or remedies, any party may institute legal action to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, or to obtain any other remedy consistent "vith the purposes of this Agreement. Such legal actions must be instituted and maintained in the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, or in any other appropriate court in that county. No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this Agreement, against the City unless a claim has first been presented in ",riting and filed with the City and acted upon by the City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same. Upon request by City, Borrower shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. (b) Aoolicable Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. (c) Acceotance of Service of Process. In the event that any legal action is commenced by Borrower against City, service of process on City shall be made by personal service upon the City's Housing Manager or City Clerk, or in such other manner as may be provided by law. In the event that any legal action is commenced by City against Borrower, service of process on Borrower shall be made in such manner as may be provided by law, and shall be valid whether made within or without the State of California. (d) Action for Soecific Performance. If either the Borrower or City defaults with regard to any of the provisions of this Agreement, the non-defaulting party shall serve written notice of such default upon the defaulting party. If the default does not commence to be cured by the defaulting party within thirty (30) days after service of the notice of default, the non- defaulting party at its option may thereafter commence an action for specific performance of the terms of this Agreement pertaining to such default, subject to the provisions of Sections 8.1 and 9.3 hereof. (e) Riilhts and Remedies are Cumulative. Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either party of one or more of its rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. Landings II Loan Agreement 37 7-53 ARTICLE 9. General Provisions Section 9.1 Notices. Demands. and Communications Between the Parties. Formal notices, demands, and communications between City, and Borrower shall be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by reputable document delivery service such as Federal Express that provides a receipt shoINing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the address of the party as set forth below, or at any other address as that party may later designate by notice: To City: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 A ttn: Director of Development Services With a copy to: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Attn: City Attorney 'To Borrower: CIC Landings 2, L.P. clo Chelsea Investment Corporation 5993 Avenida Encinas, Suite 101 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attention: James J. Schmid Notices personally delivered or delivered by document delivery service shall be deemed effective upon receipt. Notices mailed shall be deemed effective on the second business day following deposit in the United States mail. Such written notices, demands, and communications shall be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as either party may from time to time designate by mail. Section 9.2 Nonliabilitv of City Officials and Emplovees: Conflicts of Interest. No member. official, employee, or contractor of City shall be personally liable to Borrower in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Borrower or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. No member, official, employee, or agent of City shall have any direct or indirect interest in this Agreement nor participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which is prohibited by law. Section 9.3 Enforced Delav: Extension of Times of Performance. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, and except as expressly set forth in Section 8.2 and this Section 38 7-54 Landings II Loan Agreement 9.3, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default and such party shall be entitled to an extension of time to perform its obligations hereunder where delays in performance are due to causes beyond the control and without the fault of such party, including as applicable: war; insurrection; strikes; lock-outs; riots; floods; earthquakes; fIres; casualties; supernarural causes; acts of the public enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; freight embargoes; lack of transportation; governmental restrictions or priority; litigation; unusually severe weather; inability to secure necessary labor, materials or tools; delays of any contractor, subcontractor or supplies; acts of the other party; acts or the failure to act of City or any other public or governmental City or entity (except that any act or failure to act of or by City shall not excuse timely performance by City). In addition, nothing in this Section 9.3 is intended or shall be interpreted to entitle Borrower to an extension of time to close the escrow for acquisition of the Property or to delay commencement of construction of the Project. An extension of time for any cause permitted under this Section 9.3 shall be limited to the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thirty (30) days of knowledge of the commencement of the cause, or if no written notice is sent within thirty (30) days, from the date written notice is sent by the other party. Times of performance under this Agreement may be extended by mutual written agreement of City and Borrower. Section 9.4 Inspection of Books and Records. The Borrower shall keep and maintain at the Project, or elsewhere within the County of San Diego, full, complete and appropriate books, records and accounts relating to the Project, including all such books, records and accounts necessary or prudent to evidence and substantiate in full detail Borrower's calculation of Residual Receipts and compliance with the affordable housing requirements herein. Books, records and accounts relating to Borrower's compliance \Yith the terms, provisions, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement shall be kept and maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied, and shall be consistent with requirements of this Agreement. All such books, records, and accounts shall be open to and available for inspection by the City, and its auditors or other authorized representatives at reasonable intervals during normal business hours upon reasonable prior notice to Borrower. Copies of all tax returns and other reports that Borrower may be required to furnish any governmental entity shall at all reasonable times, upon reasonable prior notice to Borrower, be open for inspection by the City at the place that the books, records, accounts of the Borrower are kept. The Borrower shall preserve records on which any statement of Residual Receipts is based for a period of not less than fIve (5) years after such statement is rendered. City shall have the right at all reasonable times to inspect the books and records of Borrower pertaining to the Property and the Proj ect as pertinent to the purposes of this Agreement. Borrower shall provide its books and records to City without reasonable delay upon no less than five (5) days prior written request by City. City shall not request inspection for Borrower's books and records more than once in any twelve (12) month period, unless City is required to obtain information in order to comply with reporting or other requirements of law herein. Landings IT Loan Agreement 39 7-55 City shall have the right at all reasonable times to inspect the books and records of Borrower pertaining 10 the Property and the Project as pertinent to the purposes of this Agreement. Section 9.5 lnteroretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against any party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. The section headings are for purposes of convenience only, and shall not be construed to limit or extend the meaning of this Agreement. Section 9.6 Entire Agreement. Waivers and Amendments. This Agreement, together with the Promissory Note, Deed of Trust, Affordable Housing Agreement and other documents executed pursuant to this Agreement, integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein, or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations and previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of the party to be charged, and all amendments and modifications hereto must be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of City and Borrower. Section 9.7 ConsentlReasonableness. Except when this Agreement specifically authorizes a party to withhold its approval or consent in its sole and absolute discretion, when either City or Borrower shall require the consent or approval of another party in fulfilling any agreement, covenant, provision, or condition contained in this Agreement, such consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed by the party from whom such consent or approval is sought. Section 9.8 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement. In the event that all or any portion of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable, this Agreement or that portion which is found to be unenforceable shall be deemed to be a statement of intention by the parties; and the parties further agree that in such event, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, they shall take all steps reasonably necessary to comply with such procedures or requirements as may be reasonably necessary in order to make valid this Agreement or that portion which is found to be unenforceable. Section 9.9 Third Party Beneficiaries. Notwithstanding any other prOVISIOn of this Agreement to the contrary nothing herein is intended to create any third party beneficiaries to this Agreement, and no person or entity other than City and Borrower, and the permitted successors and assigns of each of them, shall be authorized to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. Section 9.10 Representations and Warranties. Borrower represents and warrants that: (i) Borrower is a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, in good standing, and authorized to do business and doing business in the County of Landings II Loan Agreement 40 7-56 San Diego; (ii) Borrower has all requisite power and authority to carry out its business as now and whenever conducted and to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement; (iii) by proper action of Borrower, Borrower's signatories have been duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement; (iv) the execution of this Agreement by Borrower does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which Borrower is a party; (v) except as may be specifically set forth in this Agreement, and except for the approval of Borrower's investor limited partner, no approvals or consents not heretofore obtained by Borrower are necessary in connection with the execution of this Agreement by Borrower or with the performance by Borrower of its obligations hereunder, and (vi) no attachments, execution proceedings, assignments for the benefit of creditors, insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization, receivership or other proceedings are pending or threatened against the Borrower, or any partners of Borrower, nor are any of such proceedings contemplated by Borrower or any partners of Borrower. Section 9.11 Execution. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument Section 9.12 Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship between the City and Borrower is such that Borrower is an independent entity and not an agent or partner of City. Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute Borrower as the agent or partner or representative of City for any purpose whatsoever. Section 9.13 Attornev's Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend litigation in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to its actual and reasonable attorney's fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend litigation with a third party because of the violation of any term or provision of this Agreement by the other party, then the party so litigating shall be entitled to its actual and reasonable attorney's fees from the other parry to this Agreement. Attorney's fees shall include attorney's fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney's fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, retaining expert witnesses, taking depositions and discovery, and all other necessary costs incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each such party shall bear its own legal costs incurred in connection with the negotiation, approval, and execution of this Agreement. ARTICLE 10. Option and First Right of Refusal Section 10.1 City Option to Acquire the PropertY Upon Uncured Default. (a) Granting of the Option to Acquire Propertv Upon Uncured Default bv Borrower. Borrower grants to City an Option ("Option") to purchase the Property, including \Nithout limitation the Project, on the terms and conditions set forth in an Option and First Right of Refusal as approved by the office of the City Attorney, in its reasonable discretion, to be exercised upon the uncured default of the Borrower under the terms of this Agreement, the Bond Documents, the TCAC Regulatory Agreement, the Affordable Housing Agreement and any and all other loan documents and/or regulatory agreements affecting the Property and/or Project Landings II Loan Agreement 41 7-57 (b) Consideration for the Option. The execution of this Agreement and the making of. the City Loan by the City to the Borrower shall be the consideration for entering into the Option. Borrower hereby acknowledges that the City would not enter into this Agreement or make the City Loan without the Borrower granting the Option. (c) Memorandum of Option and First Right of Refusal. Borrower shall execute, acknowledge, deliver and' cause to be recorded upon the close of the Escrow for the City Loan, the Memorandum of Option and First Right of Refusal, in a form and format as reasonably approved by the office of the City Attorney. (d) The Option Price. The Option price shall be the amount of the senior debt to the City Loan as approved by the City in this Agreement. (e) Rights of Tax Credit Limited Partner. The tax credit limited partner of the Borrower shall have an option to acquire the Property, upon default, which is senior to that granted to the City herein. The City's option shall be junior and subordinate to that of the tax credit limited partner, as approved by the City. (f) Term of the Option. The option in favor of the City shall commence upon the acquisition of the Property by the Borrower and shall terminate fifty-five years thereafter. (g) Exercise of the Option. The City may exercise the option within thirty (30) days after the expiration of notice of an uncured event of default under the applicable agreements, in accordance with the provisions of Section 8.1 of this Agreement. (h) Escrow to Effectuate Option. An escrow shall be opened between the Borrower and the City upon the timely exercise of the option and shall close within ninety (90) days thereafter. Section 10.2 Citv First Right of Refusal to Acquire PropertY. (a) Grantin2: of First Ri2:ht of Refusal to Acquire PropertY. In addition to the Option referenced within Section 10.1 of this Agreement, the Borrower hereby grants the City a First Right of Refusal to purchase the property on the terms set forth in an Option and First Right of Refusal as approved by the office of the City Attorney, in its reasonable discretion. (b) Consideration for First Right of Refusal. The execution of this Agreement and the making of the City Loan by the City is the consideration for entering into this First Right of Refusal. (c) Term of First Ri2:ht of Refusal. The City's first right of refusal shall commence upon the acquisition of the Property by the Borrower and shall expire fifty-five years thereafter. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] 42 7-58 Landings II Loan Agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date specified herein, "CITY" CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a public body, corporate and politic By: James D. Sandoval, City Manager ATTEST: Donna Nords, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Bart MiesfeId, City Attorney "BORROWER" crc Landings 2, L.P., a Cali fomialimited partnersh ip By: Chelsea Investment Corpo ion Califurnia tion, . s general partner By: 7-59 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Real property in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: LOT 1 OF CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 01-011 OTAY RANCH- VILLAGE 11 PORTIONS OF NEIGHBORHOODS MU-l AND R-19, IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAi\[ DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEROF NO. 15640, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SA.N DIEGO COUNTY ON NOVEMBER 8, 2007. APN: 643-770-01-00 A-I 7-60 EXHIBIT B STATEMENT OF INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS (Including Ail Successors and Assigns of Borrower) Borrower acknowledges the receipt of these insurance requirements and agrees to maintain in full force and effect, the following policies during the term of the City of Chula Vista's ("City") loan at Borrower's sole cost and expense. Ail insurance policies shall contain a provision requiring thirty (30) days advance written notice to the City of cancellation. Borrower agrees to maintain the following insurance coverages: 1. Required Insurance. To at all times provide, maintain and keep in force at Borrower's sole expense the following policies of insurance: (a) Insurance against loss or damage to the Improvements by fire and any of the risks covered by insurance of the type now known as "fire and extended coverage" including endorsement designating City as a Loss Payee, in an amount no less than the original amount of the Note plus any senior liens or encumbrances or the full replacement cost of the Improvements, including the cost of debris removal (exclusive of the cost of excavations, foundations and footings below the lowest basement floor), whichever is greater, and with not more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) deductible from the loss payable for any casualty. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary contained in the Loan Agreement ("Agreement"), during the period of time from the loan closing through completion of construction of the Project, Borrower's obligation to provide the insurance described in this Section lea) may be satisfied by a builder's risk policy in the amount of not less than ($~, provided a certificate of insurance acceptable to City and naming the City of Chula Vista, its Redevelopment Agency, and its Housing Authority as additional insureds with primary coverage, is filed with City prior to closing of the City Loan. The policies of insurance carried in accordance \\lith this subparagraph (a) shall contain the "Replacement Cost Endorsements"; (b) Business interruption insurance and/or loss of "rental value" insurance in such amounts as are satisfactory to City; (c) Comprehensive general public liability insurance, including coverage for elevators and escalators, if any, on the Property, and coverage for non-owned automobiles, insuring against claims for "personal injUty", including, without limitation, bodily injury, death or property damage occurring on, in or about the Property and the adjoining streets, sidewalks and passageways, such insurance to afford immediate minimum protection to a limit of not less than a project specific Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit with Four Million Dollar ($4,000,000) Aggregate Limit, with respect to personal injUty or death to anyone or more persons or damage to property (as that amount may be increased from time to time by City in its reasonable discretion). General Liability policy must endorse and B-1 7-61 designate City as an Additional Insured. Liability Additional Insured Endorsement must be primary, must not exclude Completed Operations, and must be endorsed to include a Ten (10) year extended reporting period; (d) Workers' compensation insurance (including employer's liability insurance, if requested by City) for all employees of Borrower engaged on or with respect to the Property in such amount as is reasonably satisfactoty to City, or if such limits are established by law, in such amounts; (e) During the course of any construction or repair of Improvements on the Property, builder's completed value risk insurance against "all risks of physical loss", including collapse and transit coverage, during construction of such Improvements, with deductibles not to exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), in non-reporting form, covering the total value of work performed and equipment, supplies and materials furnished. City to be endorsed as a Loss Payee. Said policy of insurance shall contain the "permission to occupy upon completion of work or occupancy" endorsement; (t) Boiler and machinery insurance covering pressure vessels, air tanks, boilers, machinery, pressure piping, heating, air conditioning, and elevator equipment and escalator equipment provided the Improvements contain equipment of such nature, and insurance against loss of occupancy or use arising from breakdown of any of the items referred to in this subparagraph (t), in such amounts as are reasonably satisfactory to City; (g) Insurance against flood damage, including surface waters, if the Property is located in an area considered a flood risk by the United State Department of Housing and Urban Development; (h) Insurance against loss or damage to the Personal Property by fire and other risks covered by insurance of the type now known as "fire and extended coverage." Notwithstanding the foregoing, the insurance coverage described in this Section I(h) is not required to be a separate policy of insurance, provided such risks are insured by one or more policies of insurance obtained by Borrower; and (1) Such other insurance (including, but not limited to, earthquake insurance), and in such amounts, as may from time to time be required by City against the same or other hazards, provided such additional insurance is available at commercially reasonable rates. (j) Pollution Liability insurance - project specific limits (k) Excess Liability Insurance (1) Professional Liability I E&O (design professionals, etc) - project specific limits All policies of insurance required by the terms of the Deed of Trust shall contain an endorsement or agreement by the insurer that any loss shall be payable in accordance with the 8-2 7-62 terms of such policy, notwithstanding any act or negligence of Borrower which might otherwise result in forfeiture of said insurance, and the further agreement of the insurer waiving all rights of setoff, counterclaim or deductions against Borrower. 2. Delivery of Policies. Pavment of Premiums. All policies of insurance shall be issued by companies admitted to issue insurance policies in the State of California, and rated A V or better by AJ'v! Best, and in amounts in each company satisfactory to City. All policies of insurance shall have attached thereto a lender's loss payable endorsement for the benefit of the holder of the first priority deeds of trust on the property and Improvements, and then for the benefit of City in form satisfactory to City. Borrower shall furnish City with an original copy of all policies of required insurance. At least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of each such policy, Borrower shall furnish City with evidence satisfactory to City of the payment of premium and the re-issuance of a policy continuing insurance in force as required by the Deed of Trust. All such policies shall contain a provision that such policies will not be canceled or materially amended, which terms shall include any reduction in the scope of limits of coverage, without at least thirty (30) days prior ",Titten notice to City. In the event Borrower fails to provide the policies of insurance required by the Deed of Trust, City may procure such insurance or single- interest insurance for such risks covering City's interest, and Borrower will pay all premiums thereon promptly upon demand by City, and until such payment is made by Borrower the amount of all such premiums, together with interest thereon at the rate often percent (10%) per annum or the maximum rate allowed by law, whichever is less. In the event any lender, who has a secured interest in the Property, requires additional insurance and/or insurance with greater coverages than that required by this Statement of Insurance Requirements, Borrower agrees to provide to and name the City on such policies providing greater and additional coverages. Borrower, by execution of this Statement of Insurance Requirements, agrees to provide the required insurance during the term of the loan and to require all successors in interest to agree to provide such coverages for the benefit of the City. Borrower acknowledges that performance of the covenants contained herein are a material inducement to making the loan to Borrower. . 3. Si!!nature Authoritv. ..oJl individuals signing this Statement of Insurance Requirements for a party which is a corporation, lirnited liability company, partnership or other legal entity, or signing under a power of attorney, or as a trustee, guardian, conservator, or in any other legal capacity, covenant to the City that they have the necessary capacity and authority to act for, sign and bind the respective entity or principal on whose behalf they are signing. B-3 7-63 Executed this _ day of .2009. "BORROWER" CIC Landings 2, L.P., a California limited partnership By: Chelsea Investment Corporation A California corporation, i general partner . B-4 7-64 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT '~7,~ ~(f?- C1lYOF .~ (HULA VISTA Item No.: B Meeting Date: 6/9/09 ITEM TITLE: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO CVMC 15.60 ABANDONED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY REGISTRATION ORDINANCE. SUBMITTED BY: DEPUTY CITY MANAGERlDIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVIC:E~.1 REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGER 4/5THS VOTE: YES NO SUMMARY Staff recommends that this public hearing be continued to a date certain on July 14,2009. SJ CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & HOUSING AUTHORITY AGENDA STATEMENT :-.w.. ::;; ~ (In' OF .~~ (HULA VlSTA JUNE 9, 2009, Iteml ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Consideration by the City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Housing Authority of the Adoption ofthe Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the City and the Redevelopment Agency and the Operating Budget for the Housing Authority for Fiscal Year 2009/20 I 0 A. Council Resolution: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista Adopting the Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the City of Chula Vista excluding Capital Projects LB143, STM355, and TF344 and the interfund loan from the Transportation Development Impact Fee fund to the Public Facilities Impact Fee fund for Fiscal Year 2009/2010 and Appropriating Funds for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010. B. Council Resolution: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista Adopting the Capital Improvement Budget for Project LBl43 for Fiscal Year 2009/2010 and Appropnating Funds for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010. C. Coul).cil Resolution: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista Adopting the Capital Improvement Budget for Project STM355 for Fiscal Year 2009/2010 and Appropriating Funds for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010. D. Council Resolution: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista Adopting the Capital Improvement Budget for Project TF344 for Fiscal Year 2009/2010 and Appropriating Funds for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010. E. Council Resolution: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approving the budget for an interfund loan from the Transportation Development Impact Fee fund to the Public FacIlItIes Impact Fee Fund and Appropriating Funds for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010. 9-1 F. Council Resolution: G. Redevelopment Agency Resolution: H. Redevelopment Agency Resolution: 1. Housing Authority Resolution: J. Council Ordinance: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: JUNE 09, 2009, Item-=:L Page 2 of 8 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista Amending the Compensation Schedule and Classification Plan to reflect the addition and elimination of various position titles as reflected in the Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Operating Budget. Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista Adopting the Operating and Capitallmprovement Budget for the Redevelopment Agency for the Southwest! Towne Center II10tay Valley/Added Area Project Area for Fiscal Year 2009/2010 and Appropriating Funds for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010. Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chu1a Vista Adopting the Operating and Capital lmprovement Budgets for the Redevelopment Agency for Towne Center I and the Bayfront Project Areas for Fiscal Year 2009/2010 and Appropriating Funds for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010. Resolution of the Housing Authority of the City of Chula Vista Adopting the Operating Budget for the Housing Authority for Fiscal Year 2009/2010 and Appropriating Funds for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010. Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista amending Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.05.010 relating to the establishment of unclassified positions to eliminate the following titles _ Animal Control Manager, Assistant Director of Budget and Analysis, Assistant Director of Building and Housing, Assistant Director of Human Resources, Assistant Director of Planning, Assistant Director of Recreation, Assistant Fire Chief, Assistant Library Director, CBAG Budget Manager, CBAG Lead Programmer Analyst, Chief of Staff, Coastal! Environmental Policy Consultant, Director of Budget and Analysis, Director of Communications, Executive Assistant to the City Manager, Government Relations Liaison, Parks and Open Space Manager, Special Projects Manager; and to add the following titles _ Animal Care Facility Manager, Budget and Analysis Manager, Communications Coordinator, Deputy Fire Chlef, and Fire Division Chief (4/5ths Vote Required For This Item) FINANCE DIRE~TO ::trK CITY MANAGE ASSIST ANT CITY 1\ ANAGER ""5> T 9-2 JUNE 09, 2009, Item~ Page 3 of8 ITEMS A-I ITEM J 4/STHS VOTE: YES 4/STHS VOTE: YES o NO o NO o o SUMMARY The City Council has received and considered the City Manager's proposed operating and capital improvement budgets for the City and the Redevelopment Agency and the operating budget for the Housing Authority for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. Work sessions were held on November 17,2008, December 4,2008, January 13,2009 and May 12, 2009 to consider and deliberate on the recommendations contained in the proposed budgets. The budgets submitted at this time for formal adoption represent the City Manager's proposed budgets, as presented in the fiscal year 2009/20 I 0 proposed budget document, amended to reflect various clean up items. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity, adoption of the Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the City and the Redevelopment Agency and the Operating Budget for the Housing Authority for fiscal year 2009/2010, for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it involves only the allocation of funding; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Housing Authority adopt their respective resolutions and hold first reading of the ordinance. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation adopted a resolution on May 28, 2009 recommending that the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency adopt the proposed operating and capital improvement budget for the Redevelopment Agency and Housing Authority for Fiscal Year 2009/1 0 budget. DISCUSSION Staff submitted the Proposed Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Budget document to the City Council on May 22,2009. As required by the City Charter, the City Manager's proposed budget was submitted to the City Council at least thirty-five days before the beginning of the fiscal year. The proposed fiscal year 2009/2010 budget was also the subject of budget workshops held on November 17, 2008, December 4,2008, January 13, 2009 and May 12, 2009. ThiS report summarizes the City Manager's proposed budget for fiscal year 2009/2010 as amended to reflect various cleanup items presented below. 9-3 JUNE 09, 2009, Iteml Page 4 of8 Proposed Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Bud!!:et Attachment A summarizes the City Manager's proposed fiscal year 2009/2010 budget. The dollar amounts shown include various clean up items that are presented below. The final All Funds expenditure budget submitted for fiscal year 2009/2010 totals $300.0 million and includes a General fund budget of $133.0 million. The All Funds budget for fiscal year 2009/2010 also includes spending allocations for capital improvement projects totaling $30.7 million, Redevelopment Agency funds total $29.5 million, and the Housing Authority fund totals $1.0 million. Estimated All Funds revenues total $290.6 million - see Attachment B. The General fund operating budget is funded in full by estimated revenues of $133.0 million with no anticipated impact on available General fund reserves. The General fund and Transit fund are anticipated to be balanced in fiscal year 2009/10 with no impact to the reserves for these funds. The Sewer fund and Development Services fund are projected to increase their respective reserve balances, while the Redevelopment Agency, Other funds, Capital Project funds, Debt Services funds, and Fleet Management funds are anticipated to draw down reserve balances in fiscal year 2009-10, primarily due to loan repayments or use of capital project funds received in prior years. The total number of recommended permanent positions is 1,005.00 for fiscal year 2009/2010. This represents a net reduction of 104.5 positions from the fiscal year 2008/09 adopted budget. Attachment C summarizes the final recommended position counts by department and fund for fiscal year 2009/2010. The proposed fiscal year 2009/10 budget provides for a loan from the TDIF to the PFDIF. Due to the significant housing meltdown and number of foreclosures experienced within the City of Chula Vista, the development of new housing has stalled. This has created a cash deficit in the PFDIF fund. Due to the severity of the housing crisis, the PFDIF fund will be unable to meet its annual debt obligations for the next few years. In order to avoid an impact to the General Fund, the proposed budget includes an interfund loan from the TDIF to the PFDIF fund for $5.3 million to make the debt service payments scheduled for the fiscal year 2009/10. This will provide the City an opportunity to work through a restructuring of the PFDIF debt obligations with the objective of creating cash flow savings to meet debt obligations over the next few years. The interfund loan will not be processed if other options are available - this may include debt restructuring and/or increased revenues if development levels increase. Bud!!:et Cleanup Items Since the Proposed fiscal year 2009/2010 Budget document was printed and distributed several changes have been made; these changes are detailed in Attachment D. The adjustments to the General fund expenditure budget total $121,600 and are fully offset by revenue, resulting in no net impact on the General fund. These adjustments largely reflect the addition of funding for South Bay Commumty Services - Youth Counselmg program. 9-4 JUNE 09, 2009, Item~ Page 5 of8 In addition to the adj ustments to the General fund, there were several changes to other funds; these adjustments resulted III a net expenditure increase of $918,700 and a net revenue increase of $ 530,000. These adjustments are mainly a result of adding an additional ClP project and purchasmg Police vehicles from the Traffic Safety Fund. , j:';'~~ General Fund Budget Adjustments Updated General Fund S 132,844,444 S 121,600 $ 132,966,044 $ 132,844,444 $ 121,600 $ 132,966,044 Other Funds Adjustments to Other Funds Updated Other Funds Budget $ 157,143,187 $ 530,000 $ 157,673,187 $ 166,101,471 $ 918,700 $ 167,020,171 lirpbalea,j.iitEunaSKHu.dliet;!~~~,~. ~Sf29;0'!i}j9l2j Position Summary As part of tonight's action, staff is requesting that Council amend the Compensation Schedule and Classification Plan to reflect the staffing changes proposed in the fiscal year 2009/2010 budget. The following classifications are recommended to be eliminated from the Compensation Schedule and the Classification Plan: . Coastal and Environmental Policy Consultant Chief of Staff Assistant City Clerk Director of Communications Assistant Director of Budget & Analysis Director of Budget & Analysis Executive Assistant to the City Manager Special Projects Manager Special Events Planner Government Relations Liaison Graphic Designer Assistant DIrector Human Resources Parking Meter Technician Assistant Di rector Planning Assistant DIrector BUlldmg & Housmg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-5 JUNE 09, 2009, Item Of , Page60f8 . Development Services Counter Manager . Senior Plans Examiner . CBAG Budget Manager . CBAG Lead Programmer Analyst . Animal Control Manager . Assistant Fire Chief . Director of Engineenng . Parks & Open Space Manager . Painter . Equipment Maintenance Manager . Assistant Library Director . Literacy and Programming Coordinator . Senior Educational Services Supervisor . Educational Services Supervisor . Assistant Director of Recreation Staff is recommending the establishment of three new job titles - one new classified job title and two new unclassified job titles. The departments worked with the Human Resources department to determine the appropriate classification and compensation for this new position. The new classification, bargaining group, and E-Step salary are listed below. Veterinary Assistant No Communications Coordinator Yes Fire DlVision Chief Yes CVEA rvL.\.1 - U C MM-UC $1,588.48 $3,305.07 55,022.52 There are three positions where staff is recommending a title change only with no change in bargaining group or salary. Assistant Fire Chief Animal Control Manager Assistant Director of Budget and Analysis Deputy Fire Chief Animal Care Facility Manager Budget and Analysis Manager The fiscal year 2009/20 I 0 budget also reflects a change in bargaining group and salary for the Code Enforcement Manager from middle management to senior management; the increased costs associated wIth this change are revenue offset. Finally, the budget also reflects the reestablishment of the Deputy City Manager classification in the executive management group to reflect the current City management structure. In addition to amending the Classification Plan and Compensation Schedule, Chula Vista MUlllcipal Code Section 2.05.010 also needs to be updated to reflect the position changes 9-6 JUNE 09, 2009, Item~ Page 70f8 impacting theunclassi tied positions. Chula Vista City Charter Section 500 requires that all unclassified posItions not mentioned specifically in Charter Section 500 be adopted by ordinance. The fiscal year 2009/2010 proposed budget includes the elimination of several unclassified positions. Adoption of the ordinance will remove the following position titles from Municipal Code Section 2.05.010: Assistant Director of Budget and Analysis, Coastal and Environmental Policy Consultant, Chief of Staff, Director of Communications, Executive Assistant to the City Manager, Special Projects Manager, Government Relations Liaison, Assistant Director Human Resources, Assistant Director Planning, Assistant Director Building and Housing, CBAG Budget Manager, Animal Control Manager, CBAG Lead Programmer Analyst, Assistant Fire Chief, Parks & Open Space Manager, Assistant Library Director, Assistant DIrector of Recreation. With adoption of the ordinance, the position titles of Animal Care Facility Manager, Budget and Analysis Manager, Communications Coordinator, Deputy Fire Chief, and Fire Division Chief will be added to Municipal Code Section 2.05.010. It should be noted that for administrative purposes, there are some position titles that are included in Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.05.010 but are not included in the fiscal year 2009/20 I 0 budget; these include the Assistant Chief of Police, CBAG Administrative Analyst I, CBAG Network Administrator II, and Traffic Engineer. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found that potential conflicts exist in that Council members have property holdings within 500 feet of the CIP projects listed below and/or redevelopment project area: o Mayor Cox - Project TF344 (Direct Access Ramp I-80S East "H" and East Palomar fiscal year 2009/2010). This conflict pertains to Item D. o Councilmember Castaneda - Project LB 143 (Civic Center Library Veterans Wing fiscal year 2009/2010), Redevelopment Agency for Towne Center I and the Bayfront Project Areas, and the interfund loan from the Transportation Development Impact Fee Fund to the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee Fund. These conflicts pertain to Items B, E, and H. o Councilmember Ramirez - Redevelopment Agency for the Southwest/ Towne Center II/Otay Valleyl Added Area Project Area. This conflict pertains to Item G. o Councilmember McCann - Project STM355 (Otay Lakes Road Widening fiscal year 2009/2010) as well as the Redevelopment Agency for the Southwest! Towne Center II/Otay Valleyl Added Area Project Area. These conflicts pertam to Items C and G. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the proposed budgets as amended will result in the appropriatlon of $300.0 million in fi.mding fOI speclfic actiVIties for the fiscal year ending June ]1\, 20 I O. This amount includes a Gmeral fund budget of $133.0 million, a capital lmprO\ ement projects 9-7 n.JNE 09, 2009, Item2 Page 8 of8 budget of $30.7 million, Redevelopment Agency funds total $29.5 million, and the Housing Authority fund budget totals $1.0 million. Revenues are projected at levels sufficient to fund the General fund with no impact to the General fund reserves. The proposed staffing changes detailed in Attachment C, resulted in a net reduction of 104.5 positions from the adopted fiscal year 2008/09 budget. ATTACHMENTS: A - Recommended Expenditures by Department and Category B - Schedule of Revenues C - Authorized Positions by Department D - Summary of Recommended Changes 9-8 01100 City Council 1,130,770 86,248 02000 Boards and Commissions 14,736 03000 City Clerk 683,789 366,921 844 04000 City Allorney 1,524,013 445,805 1,560 05000 Administra!jon 1,580,098 145,612 1,770 06000 ITS 2,327,914 660,156 57,479 100,000 07000 Human Resources 2,107,601 1,747,310 3,367 08000 Finance 2,975,784 183,871 4,365 09000 Non-Departmental (844,727) HlO,U80 0 652,321 8,688,551 10000 Gen SvcslAnlma! Care Facility 1,745,520 592,779 62,778 2,429 12000 Planning & Building Services 3,473,883 489,262 13,653 130,730 14000 Police 40,587,231 2,941,823 421,806 81,669 15000 Fire 19,021,737 1,831,373 202,473 172,216 CD 16000 Public Works 19,177,012 3,668,049 3,371,365 179,175 I CD 17000 Recreation 3,704,777 591,740 534,749 3,817 18000 llbrwy 3,879,459 881,802 374,697 357 100 GENERAL FUND TOTAL 103,074,861 14,827,567 5,052,350 1,050,498 100,000 8,860,767 132,966,044 221 Gas Tax 3,869,200 225 Traffic Signal 15,000 1,067,000 227 T ransp Sales Tax Fund 1,429 11,711,875 231 Workers Compensation 539,840 2,919,019 232 Flexible SJJending Account 310,000 236 Development Services Fund 4606,280 131,008 5,957 8,488 1,079,559 241 Parking Meter 8,668 231,636 19,487 165,940 120,000 245 Traffic Safety 4,000 462,700 534,140 251 Supp Law Enforcement SeN Fun 111,406 )> --j 252 Pollee Dept Grants Fund 2,638,866 362,282 5,602 329,621 --j )> 253 Inmate Welfare Fund 20,000 0 254 Local Law Enf Block Grant Pro 199,938 24,922 I s: 256 Asset Seizure 100,125 120,000 m Z 261 CA Library Services Act 25,000 102,644 --j 267 McCandliss Memorial Cult Arts 400 1,200 )> 272 Federal Grants Fund 101,335 62,320 169,904 95,000 274 ARRA Fund 2Bl Waste Mgrnt & Recycling 50,139 298,203 282 Environmental Services 405,224 599,511 627 95,221 285 Energy Conservation 62,617 37,887 301 Storm Drain Revenue 256,850 B05 290,463 311 CDBG Housing Program 51400 96,000 400,000 313 CV Housing Authority 828,806 42,800 55 156,569 314 Emergency Shelter Grant Prog 4,394 B3,804 315 ROA Housing Program 3,920,000 317 Redev Low & Mod Income Housin 227,280 5Bl 1,192,000 6,000 115,569 321 HOME Program 12,723 81,000 7,000 333 . COBG FYQO 38,000 361,701 768.471 604,922 1,461.550 CD 341 Public liability Trust 1,800,000 I 342 CFD l1-M RHR McMillin 82,687 15,540 12,381 ~ 0 343 CFDI2-M Olay Rarlch Village 7 283,221 128,000 71,569 344 cro 13M Otay Ranch Village 2 200 4,017 345 CFD 12M Olay Ranch Village 7 305,003 142,220 74,500 352 Ba~ Blvd landscape Olsl 2,060 6,967 5,846 353 Eastlake Maintenance Dist 1 230,772 82,501 59,687 354 Open Space District #1 55,964 26,158 15,200 355 Open Space District #2 8,911 3,982 2,691 356 Open Space District #3 18,600 17,405 7,622 357 Open Space District #4 57,202 23,631 13,952 358 Open Space District #5 43,680 12,342 10,382 359 Open Space District #6 16,705 9,427 5,544 361 GRen Space District #7 5,555 4,761 3,183 362 Open Space District #8 42,322 20,884 11.183 )> 363 Open Space District #9 42,737 25,057 13,090 --l 364 Open Space District #1 0 49,360 22,018 12,562 :;; 0 365 Open Space District #11 111,311 39,033 27,847 I 367 Open Space District #14 206,451 124,850 56,432 ;s: m 368 Open Space District #15 20,339 8,179 5,B43 Z --l 369 Open Space District #17 5,100 560 2,088 )> 371 Open Space District #18 64,616 46,596 19,285 Open Space Oistrict #20 844,804 307,678 203,580 Open Space District #23 39,759 8,665 9,409 Open Space District #24 12,007 11,395 4.465 375 Open Space District #26 6.898 3,031 2,706 376 Open Space District #31 71,921 46,211 21,071 378 CFD 07M-Easttk Jl Woods, Visla 321,615 128,171 166,090 379 CFD 08M-Vlg 6 McM & Oly Rane 491,088 246,913 197,010 380 CFD 09M-OR Vlg lJ Brooktld She 567,530 204,146 154,864 382 CFD 99-2 Otay Ranch Vlg 1 West 458,855 155,228 106,014 386 Otay Ranch Preserve 829,241 42,024 387 CFO 98-3 Sun bow 2 656,543 206,764 148,285 388 Community Facility Ost 97-1 OR 1,526,637 385,292 328,012 <0 389 Otay Ranch Village 1,2 6,7,12 58,354 29,561 17,001 I 391 Central Garage Fund 910,174 3,107,228 1,800 400 108,000 ~ ~ :39"1 Equipment Replacement 18,326 500 64,200 393 Technology Replacement 7,382 401 Bayfront Trolley Station TDA 57,000 19,000 26,679 402 Transit CVT 356,365 745,895 185,030 256,059 92,321 413 Trunk Sewer Capital Reselve 917,000 414 Sewer Service Revenue 3,980,787 19,151,821 6,961 6,831 575,958 3,263,737 115,000 428 Sewer Facility Replacement 174,258 700,000 431 Tele Cyn Sewer Basin DIF 35,000 432 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin OIF 10,000 433 Salt Creek Sewer Basin OIF 74,091 250,000 441 1994 Pension ObJigallOn Bond 2,500 2,506,688 442 ClJBG Section 108 Loan 734.471 446 Notes Payable Adamo Propet1y 48,113 )> 4," 2000 COP Ser A-Fin Project 5,000 1,862,522 --i -j 449 SO Co Regional Comm Systems 295,734 )> 2002 COP Police Facility PlUj 3,910,746 0 450 5,000 I 451 Long-term Advallces DSF~City 300,000 5,300,000 ;;: m 452 KS Fire EqUipment Capital Lease 172,216 Z CES Loan ReJ.laymenI --i 453 194,000 )> 471 2003 Refunding Cell of Part 5,700 1,065,066 472 2004 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase I 473 2006 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase 2 515 Twin Oaks Ave AD 96-1 lmprvmnt 3,680 516 Oxford SIAd 97-1 Improvement 3,854 518 AD2005-1 Tobias Drive 60,000 542 Tele Cyn Drainage DIF 1,250,000 567 PFDIF-Adamo Prop Acquisition 48,113 572 PFDIF ~ Civic Center Expansion 2,392,502 573 Police Facilities Remodel 1,736,633 574 Corporation Yard Relocation 1,098,290 587 Otay Ranch VLG Ped Ramp DIF 43,000 5a8 OR VJgll PedeslriOln Bridge D1F 3,200 CD 591 Transportation DIF 211,000 580,916 5,300,000 2,845,000 J 611 RDA Town Center I/Bayfront 318,750 400 690,558 3,617,293 875,000 150,000 ~ '" 651 So West/Twn etr IJ/Oty Vly Prj 612,947 310,700 100 2,358,248 5,946,932 150,000 150,000 652 RDA 2000 TABS Project Fund 45,000 653 RDA 2008 TARBs Project Fund 800,000 689 2000 TABS (Merged Rda ProJect) 515,000 691 Lony-term Advances DSF - RDA 1,405,000 2,782,842 693 05 Tax Rev Bnd A (CRA/ERAF L 100,569 694 06 Tax Rev Bnd A (CRA/ERAF L 125,632 695 06 SI Tax Allot,; Ref Bond Ser A 5,000 1,068,545 696 06 Sub Tax Alloc Ref Bond SerB 5,000 1,045,199 697 08 Tax Allocation Refunding Bond 963,636 715 Park Land Acquisition Fund 25,000 2,000,000 717 Resident. ConstrucUConver Fnd 679,242 723 Bicycle Facilities Fund 266,220 )> 736 Other Transportation Programs 1.402,000 3,690,234 -l -l 739 Traffic Congestion Relief Fun 348,000 )> 0 741 Prop 18 Highway Safety 3,385.407 I i:: GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 118,258,414 49,266.597 7,786,319 33,612,108 2,316,508 56,362,467 30,743,302 2,640,500 299,986,215 m Z -l )> 3000 22,192,789 26,667,759 29,306,623 $22,192,789 $26,667,759 $29,306,623 $29,232,000 $27,199,440 Other Local Taxes 3010 Sales Tax 26,715,515 28,827,392 28,304,989 3020 Franchise Fees 9,492,759 8,813,064 9,662,517 3030 Utility Taxes 6,363,446 6,981,762 7,378,301 3040 Business License Tax 1,234,912 1,237,316 1,237,322 3050 Transient Occupancy Tax 2,336,204 2,551,570 2,697,286 3070 Real Property Transfer Tax 2,122,860 1,423,599 795,606 TOTAL $48,265,696 $49,834,703 $50,076,021 $48,946,402 $48,381,560 CD I Licenses and Permits ~ 3100 Licenses 117,381 129,833 123,393 c..> 3120 Dev I Improvement Permits 2,697,584 2,198,700 2,051,184 3140 Regulatory Permits 401,576 402,001 522,760 TOTAL $3,216,541 $2,730,534 $2,697,337 $820,283 $879,820 Fines, Forfeitures. Penalties 3200 Community Appearance Penalties 458,749 536,687 690,194 3210 Law Enforcement Penalties 168,900 261,611 299,199 3240 Parking Penalties 307,647 302,480 308,250 3250 Other Penalties 208,893 214,484 222,074 TOTAL $1,144,189 $1,315,262 $1,519,717 $2,231,468 $2,379,692 Use of Monev & Property 3300 Investment Earnings 279,277 769,851 1,255,159 :t- -i 3310 Sale of Real Pmperty 361 0 154 -i :t- :3320 Sale of Personal Propef1y 11,182 51,844 54,549 0 I 3330 Rental/Lease of Equipment 123,365 105,606 91,175 s: m z -i '" Rental/Lease of Land and Space Rental/Lease of Buildings TOTAL $4,058,523 $1,780,322 Revenue from Other AQencies 3010 Sales Tax 777,551 779,959 757,366 3400 State Grants 797,928 347,927 1,329,998 3440 State Tax Sharing 275,999 278,746 288,071 3460 Motor Vehicle License Fees 18,354,839 17,676,035 19,796,531 3470 State Subvention-Booking Fees 305,049 0 0 3480 State Reimbursements 773,879 139,729 4,201 3500 Federal Grants 2,656,964 4,112,263 1,686,842 3580 Federal Reimbursements 97,138 115,352 65,394 <D 3600 Other Agency Grants 46,110 148,733 401,298 I 3690 Other Agency Revenue 1,330,798 1,333,531 1,704,993 ~ -1>0 TOTAL $25,416,255 $24,932,275 $26,034,694 $24,740,682 $21,021,968 Charaes for Services 3700 Zoning Fees 8,162,093 8,391,778 6,196,145 3720 Document Fees 45,301 30,378 73,680 3730 Plan Checking Fees 1,951,512 1,907,116 1,429,625 3740 Inspection Fees 168,880 162,324 208,203 3770 Other Dev Fees 16,595 31,276 11,840 3800 Animal Shelter Contracts 8,930 257,120 683,392 3820 Information Systems Services 12,114 3,362 1,541 3830 Services to the Port District 544,810 690,963 675,378 3840 Youth Center Utilities Reimb 35,181 20,918 20,262 3900 Recreation Program Fees 836,950 1,157,313 1,011,959 )> 3950 Class Admission Fees 360,164 558,680 530,402 ::j 3970 Referral Fees 68,902 359,849 347,876 )> 0 4200 Staff Services. Reimbursements 1,999,799 1,993,134 2,110,668 I ;;: 4300 Fees for Other Services 1,023,739 694,876 1,170,099 m z --j lD TOTAL $15,234,970 $16,259,087 $14,471,070 $6,669,109 $7,546,077 Other Revenue 4410 OIF Reimbursements 1,359,035 1,334,226 840,313 4420 Transit Reimbursements 762,460 820,427 362,818 4430 Redev Agency Reimbursements 4,406,759 4,319,107 1,984,951 4440 Open Space/Assess Dist Relmb 1,822,198 1,783,469 2,067,069 4450 C1P Reimbursements 4,333,556 5,024,531 4,665,576 4460 CDBG/Home Reimbursements 1,567,320 1,275,441 1,053,480 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 2,614,407 1,760,684 1,567,531 4600 Assessments 3,693 3,695 3,694 4700 Collection Charges 150,673 220,912 256,155 4800 Sale of Goods 57,385 80,677 72,524 CD 4900 Other Revenue 2,489,702 2,166,646 4,315,062 I TOTAL $19,567,188 $18,789,815 $17,189,173 $12,158,554 $11,437,561 ~ (]"I Transfers In 5221 Tfr In from Gas Tax Fund 3,858,092 4,167,878 4,269,058 5236 Tff In from Dev Services Fund 0 0 0 5245 Tfr In from Traffic Safety 527,984 513,600 534,144 5256 Tff In from Asset Seizure Fund 0 134,341 0 5261 Tff In from CA Library Service 74,612 70,670 29,110 5262 Tfr In from Public Library 70,647 128,454 2,000 5282 Tf( In from Environmental Serv 0 0 0 5294 Tfr In from Sewer Service Rsrv 8,581,664 9,056,172 0 5301 Tff In from Storm Drain Rev 1,357,355 309,690 238,528 5313 Tff In from CV Hsng Authority 147,000 0 0 5333 Tfr In frm CDBG 232,235 0 0 :<> 5391 Tff In from Central Garage 31,188 32,124 32,124 -j ~ 5392 Tfr In from Equip Replacement 2,400,000 0 0 0 5393 Tfr In from Tech Repl Fund 1,000,000 0 0 I s: 5395 Tff In from Central Stores 0 0 71,313 m Z -j OJ Tfr In from TransiUCVT Fund 119,767 0 0 Tfr In from Sewer Service Rsrv 0 0 4,560,008 Tfr In from Lib East Territory 2,154,748 4,000,000 0 Tf, In from RDA BFITC I 15,000 0 0 Tfr In from SWITCII/OV Proj 0 0 0 Tfr In from L T Adv OSF-RDA 0 0 0 Tfr In from CIP w/Fiscal Agent 391,311 0 0 Tfr In from Bike Facilities Fd 31,734 0 0 Tfr In from Swr Facility Repl 281,079 267,053 0 TOTAL $21,274,416 $18,679,982 $9,736,285 $11,058,308 $12,339,604 TOTAL -100 GENERAL FUND $157,809,965 $161,564,721 $153,938,093 $139,915,329 $132,966,044 CD ~~~~ I ~ 3010 Sales Tax 4,200,000 3,210,000 9,171,000 m 3300 Investment Earnings 526,006 875,065 1,082,504 3440 State Tax Sharing 3,984,265 4,075,451 4,036,861 3500 Federal Grants (13,096) 67,657 238,500 3770 Other Dev Fees 1,895,618 683,742 499,457 4440 Open Space/Assess Dist Reimb 0 6,000 1,351 4450 CIP Reimbursements 0 5,517 0 5000 Transfers In 21,694 0 0 TOTAL. 220 TRANSPORTATION FUNDS $10,614,487 $8,923,432 $15,029,673 $9,270,957 $15,820,371 Investment Earnings 0 0 249,790 Other Dev Fees 0 0 12,244,884 )> -l TOTAL.230 DEVELOPER DEPOSITS $0 $0 $12,494,674 $0 $0 :;;! 0 :r s: m z -l OJ TOTAL - 231 WORKERS COMPENSATION ~~i~~\_ 4900 Other Revenue TOTAL - 232 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT <D I ~~~~tz~m~j 3300 Investment Earnings 4900 Other Revenue ~ TOTAL - 233 TAX REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES -.I 0 5,168 2,490,139 2,899,423 $2,490,139 $2,904,591 259,359 276,064 $259,359 $276,064 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 4,703 3,045,598 $3,050,301 1~~~~~r~li~~.~f\>l~~~~~1!~j~1:~,~1t~.i~~: $2,821,917 $2,821,917 $265,866 265,866.:.'i_,~i;& 3.19,Q,-!0';i: :::.._:i3.1Q;P9R._ $310,000 5,408 127.586 $132,994 $310,000 :::~;[r~r~~l~lJ~~~1E~t~:~: ,~~~1\:<~~tf,]1 ',~,~;'1,1;J:~ $0 $0 )> --j );! o :r: ;;: m Z --j OJ <D I Plan Checking Fees Inspection Fees Other Dev Fees Staff Services Reimbursements DIF Reimbursements Redev Agency Reimbursements Open Space/Assess Dist Reimb CIP Reimbursements CDBG/Home Reimbursements Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue Transfers In ~ co TOTAL - 236 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES m,il;mlma2!~;"I'~~'!t~m~~l]\:+f.l'~~ir.1 3160 Other Permits 3240 Parking Penalties 3300 Investment E~rnings 3350 Rental/Lease of land and Space 4390 In Lieu Parking - Te I 5000 Transfers In TOTAL - 240 PARKING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 34,083 24,729 59,668 60,047 4,982 9,575 260,226 237,334 0 0 1,906 0 $360,867 $331,685 o 952,23Mii;"'~ '-_f,085;854:'~ ,>.__""~"""".,,,;:,,,,,,.Z;,..,,.O'''4k'"<"'',C,,"'' ~ ~i3) "~:1C!:\~~~'! o ~~&~~iliiliD[fu~:;~,$~11~!IT~jl2t1~~1l~1~I~&2~~ o ~~rjj0~i~~~f~ZI[QpJ~ n,_ "r>~~~~ill o it:1~6~! o 1;5,14.; ~ o fi1jm);~TI1f~~l~ilf~~.Q;Ri~ . . _,~j o ~JtiJmJJrnJiil?gIQ'~~ilil ~j~i~Q;~~ji1~~1,;Z~g~j o ~~~~X~tB~1,#:1tJ;~gt~ lE)1~mt~i~l~~tqB;ff[9;j1j o 5' o o o o o $0 $7,226,744 $5,858,031 23,209 73,339 11,051 236,611 16,160 o $362,370 $361,772 $568,126 }> --i --i }> o I ;;:: m Z --i rn 3210 517,504 842,214 1,056,790 3300 Investment Earnings 14,654 36,079 71,684 3350 Rental/Lease of Land and Space 0 0 0 3400 State Grants 485,752 0 434,864 3500 Federal Grants 122,887 191,549 2,281,967 3690 Other Agency Revenue 187,034 234,461 415,807 4900 Other Revenue 0 100,000 0 5000 Transfers In 0 0 0 TOTAL - 250 PUBLIC SAFETY $1,327,831 $1,404,303 $4,261,112 $5,409,337 $4,510,845 CD I ~ B~t~~~___15.'" 3300 Investment Earnings 3400 State Grants 3440 State Tax Sharing 3500 Federal Grants 4900 Other Revenue CD TOTAL - 260 LIBRARY/CUL TURAL ARTS mJ~~tli~~~'tfJf. 3300 Investment Earnings 3400 State Grants 3500 Federal Grants 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In TOTAL - 270 SUNDRY GRANTS 5,349 17,088 22,049 141,195 188,086 0 156,714 198,269 91,215 7,500 1,875 0 900 900 0 $311,658 $406,218 $113,264 0 (37) 0 408,213 324,533 1,342,385 0 129,560 237,957 668,906 0 0 0 0 23,824 143,469 0 13,672 $1,220,588 $454,056 $1,617,838 [L;:l~~r<~~:~ll~:,~;gi~l'lQc~~ ~iilJ]Jf};; i0:r;+t,]S}".tQSj tt~jE.i~;:.1:~]'J!D, "jj;dr'H IjJ:~,~~i:!t(~i:2W~~m;,-~,g"i.~ LL' ",105,00g;; '~;~;:~:'}6~'1 $134,900 $105,900 .. ._, ",.'-;' ........"....'".. Hll~jTIF ~~"~' iiL':k':i ~;9Ji ~!lr1:21c;;:::,;)jJdl~:-;,,'b9 rg~~(~~i~:~~(JW;~~:j!;1:~:~~,~5i f;~<Y~1~j~1ji~:~~~m~ig:;t'~L~C ~}LitiH~qUUrim~:';:^,~!sq,,_& IT~m;1;::~~~,~':;ij~llirm1Q~~~',2Wl ~r} [t~11i;~::iji1flf;in[ l'FO ,;~:rm $983,717 )> -j -j )> o I s: m Z -j OJ 3300 Investment Earnings (111) 1,387 0 3400 State Grants 356,927 (44,084) 311,556 3500 Federal Grants 8,626 0 0 3600 Other Agency Grants 0 211,620 932,951 3700 Zoning Fees 0 0 0 4300 Fees for Other Services 0 0 0 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 12,867 0 2,243 4900 Other Revenue 0 0 2,786 TOTAL - 280 CONSERV AnON $378,309 $168,923 $1,249,536 $3,438,427 $2,119,170 CD _~tt~!t14,Z;l.~~,'(!ll_~ I 3120 Dev I Improvement Permits 190,989 115,163 47,303 "" 3230 Environmental Fines Penalties 3,500 9,300 21,700 C> 3300 Investment Earnings 9,734 (1,095) 1,268 4020 Storm Drain Fees 519,172 548,360 570,070 4200 Staff Services Reimbursements 184 0 0 5000 Transfers In 2,232 0 0 TOTAL - 301 STORM DRAIN REVENUE $725,811 $671,728 $640,341 $580,660 $525,000 !, }> -1 -1 }> o I s: m z -1 III 3300 Investment Earnings 3310 Sale of Real Property 3350 Rental/Lease of Land and Space 3700 Zoning Fees 4300 Fees for Other Services 4430 Redev Agency Reimbursements 4460 CDBG/Home Reimbursements 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In <0 I I'-> ~ TOTAL - 310 HOUSING PROGRAM ~_~~Jl 3300 Investment Earnings 3400 Stale Grants 3500 Federal Grants 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In 1,968,228 2,294,709 2,758,665 156,381 278,938 493,834 0 88,088 41,604 31,294 24,592 20,866 0 0 32,367 42,047 58,897 63,083 0 0 352,934 0 0 273,013 0 0 0 10,020 7,337 142,436 4,038 1,124 0 $2,212,008 $2,753,685 $4,178,802 $3,900,931 $8,120,065 TOTAL - 320 COMM DEV BLOCK GRANTS ~~~t~~~t~~'7{~~~~~ 5000 Transfers In TOTAL - 341 PUBLIC LIABILITY TRUST 23,479 10,611 1,660,178 0 4,585,199 4,206,564 0 1,053 75 0 0 304,534 $6,268,931 $4,522,762 0 0 $0 $0 16,714 o 4,354,211 o 9,508,942 o $13,879,867 tilii~;:):~:::6;1 ~l:," ~:~:~:;::'~j ::::::.:: 1:6,!j3,.5:16,'J :;:"';:,3:~!0:~1j:5:: tf~,~;:n<dJdidili~mt~~Q]~ ~-JdjE1J ',;mi;:~tt:~H,~g;11 WjjJ~'K~,HUd:~;~l~;t~i~;q,;il M~~f~ ,:mml~~:: <':li;;'E0 ,Q'~~ ,El" [);f~,:t?~l,9}:l $4,676,546 $3,870,965 o f"dLuL;, };, '.'0 ;(;:. :,1;8~Q,9.b9j $0 $1,800,000 $0 )> -; ~ o I s:: m Z -; w 3300 4450 4600 Investment Earnings CIP Reimbursements Assessments TOTAL. 350 OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CD I N N ~"";"~mT~'T~""~ilit,1i:"~1 ' ._ I r' > . :~~t<~~>":f;a ~-;'''':'''t:;.",:.~~),:"~~,,,~~,-,,:,.~X~~''' 3300 Investment Earnings 3320 Sale of Personal Property 4420 Transit Reimbursements 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4900 Other Revenue 244,179 o 6,235,851 $6,480,030 483,662 552,998 0 29,880 7,022,578 7,541,213 $7,506,240 $8,124,091 $10,475,403 $11,866,649 97,740 92,548 0 0 724,983 781,048 36,177 29,827 4,364,737, 3,803,624 $5,223,637 $4,707,047 $3,530,978 $3,972,770 (2,026) 2,072 269,851 49,697 $267,825 $51,769 $0 $0 2,331 2,174 121,963 109,951 $124,294 $112,125 $0 $0 p -j -j p 0 I s:: m z -j OJ TOTAL - 390 FLEET MANAGEMENT ~!i~~:~~1;~1~1~;~~ 3300 Investment Earnings 4900 ~herRevenue 157,631 29,524 784,103 41,465 3,762,777 $4,775,500 TOTAL - 393 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT ~~~i~.~m~ 3300 Investment Earnings 4900 Other Revenue 46,550 539,700 $586,250 TOTAL - 395 STORES INVENTORY 1,277 159,984 $161,261 78,606 167,735 184,751 3400 State Grants 4,190,049 3,677,603 5,303,878 3690 Other Agency Revenue 0 0 74,640 4300 Fees for Other Services 2,526,486 2,433,007 1,660,821 4900 Other Revenue 0 131,967 316,059 5000 Transfers In 23,523 0 0 TOTAL - 400 TRANSIT $6.818,664 $6,410,312 $7,540,149 $1,727,168 $1,738,349 150 0 0 3300 Investment Earnings 614.598 1,339,325 6,090,269 CD 3700 Zoning Fees 0 0 13,239 I N 4000 Sewer Fees 26,150,042 28,100,484 29,097,670 W 4020 Storm Drain Fees 0 0 13 4040 Industrial Waste Fees 9,190 7,775 7,900 4100 Pump Station Fees 27,806 20,307 36,563 4410 DIF Reimbursements 0 0 21,967 4430 Redev Agency Relmbursemen1s 0 0 3,049 4440 Open Space/Assess Dist Reimb 0 0 3,773 4450 C1P Reimbursements 135,622 113,524 64,491 4460 CDBG/Home Reimbursements 0 0 5,105 4600 Assessments 6,076 1,938 5,290 4700 Collection Charges 303,802 257,948 226,425 4900 Other Revenue 0 0 7,076 5000 Transfers In 4,689,364 755,579 174,258 )> --i TOTAL - 410 SEWER $31,936.650 $30,596,880 $35,757,088 $35,274,785 $31,403,277 --i )> 0 :r ;;: m Z --i CD 3300 Investment Earnings 289,715 414,878 465,134 4350 Sewer I Drainage DIF 1,516,499 556,160 539,136 TOTAL - 430 SEWER DIF $1,806,214 $971,038 $1,004,270 $220,290 $120,000 ", D 3300 Investment Earnings 57 60 8 5000 Transfers In 2,792,205 2,724,679 3,855,348 TOTAL - 440 DS - CITY $2,792,262 $2,724,739 $3,855,356 $3,862,247 $9,561,256 _j%~:~'iti1\!~il t . . . ~ . ,,;,r; ~ - -., )::.': r, ' CD 3300 Investment Earnings 479,242 613,854 579,477 I 4900 Other Revenue 20,325,000 0 0 N 5000 Transfers In 8,180,421 9,500,218 9,904,895 ./>0 TOTAL - 470 DS - CV PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY $28,984,663 $10,114,072 $10,484,372 $10,441,083 $10,412,178 _'~ipj';:tl~ 3300 Investment Earnings 4340 Transportation DIF 4600 Assessments 54,158 95,694 103,734 125,171 2 0 72,175 54,165 28,874 $251,504 $149,861 $132,608 145,256 259,977 278,120 537 537 0 1,801 0 0 $147,594 $260,514 $278,120 TOTAL - 500 ASSESS DIST IMPROVEMENTS -~- 3300 Investment Earnings 4350 Sewer I Drainage DIF 5000 Transfers In TOTAL - 542 TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF $28,472 $28,472 $0 $0 )> ., :;;! o I ;;: m z ., OJ TOTAL - 560 PUBLIC FACILITlES DIF ~~-:I1~;il&~~' 3300 4380 492,375 17,934,536 o 3,138,140 25,179 7,289 $21,597,519 990,861 2,130,561 53,279 o 795,036 560,905 $4,530,642 32,258 ~-it-~~' 0,,' '.' ,; ,_".g_~ 2,861,465 ,.,...6,854,425-,. .' - .,81.1.,250;. 1,337 ,03 ~ ;'~i~?_;>f-:ft;;~~il~~>~-,i~];,: o f.,~ :;,~:;s{~,~01J:,;:-:'~'5.;Ago;06b;. $4,230,754 $12,102,626 $6,111,250 Investment Earnings OR Pedestrian Bridge DIF CD I N (J1 TOTAL - 580 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DIF ~~__~a~:~~il1 3300 Investment Earnings 4340 Transportalion D1F 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In TOTAL - 590 TRANSPORTATION DIF 77,754 157,161 562,431 262,696 $640,185 $419,857 768,336 1,224,923 4,413,680 719,921 85,000 0 7,289 0 $5,274,305 $1,944,844 138 ,427 tL~8d:]:;bf:}G_!&~.lf;~;:g?_,{J t\3~:;!;;nl'M~~Mj:fillip::~ 271,292 [-i';;ii421,~f~,;l,';; ,.;,9:g,006; $409,719 $421,178 $90,000 1,171,546 471.713 o o $1,643,259 1~;~~j~)I~llim1['m{~ c';;i~,;::2_~'1 ):;;,t~b,~; :. n,::'1Ej~tlR!~ r;",; ;;':, l5.0, 92JUl:;;:j'; 75.9;9'1.0;; 9O:i;i;:::)~~4id6~; $930,000 $2,152,000 P -l -l P o I ;;: m z -l III 3000 Property Tax 3300 Investment Earnings 3700 Zoning Fees 3720 Document Fees 4360 Bayfront Fine Arts Fee 4430 Redev Agency Reimbursements 4450 CIP Reimbursements 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In TOTAL - 600 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CD I '" en ~~!~li~~{;f.;:~f!!~j~f't.1 3000 Property Tax . 3300 Investment Earnings TOTAL - 670 SW TAX AGREEMENT _:;:~~~~!1~~ 3000 Property Tax 3300 Investment Earnings 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In TOTAL - 680 DEBT SERV - REDEV AGENCY 3,876,643 6,076,772 6,353,413 699,468 598,006 295,952 0 0 2,542 17 0 0 0 0 25,000 0 0 1,793 0 0 0 80,133 11,087 0 1,054,414 47,304 762,838 263,708 4,000,347 0 $5,974,383 $10,733,516 $7,441,538 $12,440,384 $15,625,385 975,153 1,237,035 1,363,173 31,689 56,789 85,569 $1,006,842 $1,293,824 $1,448,742 $0 $0 3,584,859 2,327,101 3,318,076 209,870 386,439 269,202 0 257,507 7,665 0 25,760,000 0 1,081,010 17,373,176 1,492,586 $4,875,739 $46,104,223 $5,087,529 $3,921,946 $5,984,423 )> -< );! 0 I ;;: m Z -< OJ CD I "" -.J TOTAL -700 MISC CAPITAL PROJECTS ~~~~21l-l~1 3300 Investment Earnings 3400 State Grants 3500 Federal Grants 3600 Other Agency Grants 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In 668.761 1,356,184 13,330,770 12,977 17,223,884 $32,592,576 393,650 2,688,192 7.980,398 37,596 o $11.099,836 151,325 2,146,264 1.468.781 o 1.102,129 $4,868,499 ~~E~ih:1tL2st9'{9,~g~jlri~:i~LD)JI;~Q;q9,Q]j ~:1~[~~fQ~~~l~";' ;:;,'~ ' oil [mm?>!~~',illmilimM~H'g;m :::::',~,:.';/2::,9 :L;:';", ~6j9Qq2 $1,200,000 $610,000 TOTAL - 730 OTHER TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS (45,920) 415,642 115,623 86,625 2,108,082 4,047.734 1.791,677 23,837 205,145 88,300 0 39.661 0 59,662 2,769 0 8,290 0 3,384 0 0 $1,924,066 $2,615,513 $4,410,932 $14,001,588 $9,678,490 $342,606,160 $327,473,835 $312,802,698 $289,609,385 $290,639,231 )> -j -j )> o I ;;: m Z -j OJ ATTACHMENT C Chief of Staff 1.00 (1 00) Coastal/Environmental Policy Consultant 1.00 (1.00) Constituent Services Manager 1.00 Councilperson 4.00 Executive Secretary 1.00 Mayor 1.00 Office Specialist (Mayor/ at will) 1.00 Senior Council Assistant 4.00 1.00 CITY COUNCIL TOTAL 14.00 (1.00) 13.00 ~~~t,~'t~Ia'ti~'~~ " .... ' '.. . tp. ",;:w-~~ ,..~.;;",- .;"'" .. .;,,~:. - ,"-" ,.. .. $', ' , .....'.:-~:~~";!.( Administrative Secretary 1.00 Assistant City Clerk 1.00 (1.00) City Clerk 1.00 Deputy City Clerk 1 00 Records Manager 1.00 Records Specialist 1.00 Senior Office Specialist 0.50 Senior Records Specialist 1.00 CITY CLERK TOTAL 7.50 (1.00) 6.50 ~'l~~'~.~a ' .. ..' ,;~... ~ ~ ~- .,_.,(~ij:~~,~,t1!'0T.:1t;!~;J~~..:.)~';j' .,.;!k.,..,,~,: Assistant City Attorney 1.00 City Attorney 1 00 Deputy City Attorney II 1 00 1.00 Deputy City Attorney III 4.00 (2.00) Executive Secretary 1.00 (100) .. - Legal Assistant 2.00 2:00 Senior Assistant City Attorney 2.00 (1 00) -tOO Senior Legal Assistant 1.00 1:00 CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL 12.00 (2.00) 10.00 ~~-~~~ ',D _"'.' .., . ,0.. ._:"'1,~ .. '?i'j\"~~_,:'~>. ~r:_?"~~; Admmlstrative Secretary 1.00 (100) Administrative Technician 1.00 1.00 Assistant City Manager 1 00 1 00 Assistant Director of Budget & Analysis 1 00 (1.00) City Manager 1.00 1.00 9-28 Communications Coordinator Director of Budget and Analysis Director of Communications Director of Conservation & Environmental Services Economic Development Officer Environmental Resource Manager Environmental Resource Specialist Executive Assistant to the City Manager Executive Secretary Fiscal & Management Analyst Government Relations Liaison Graphic Designer Principal Economic Development Specialist Principal Management Analyst Senior Graphic Designer Senior Management Analyst Senior Secretary Special Events Planner Special Projects Manager ADMINISTRATION TOTAL ~rJZI.ljK;M;;tlIi~..,!t~ . ~,u,.....} .". . - .. ". ,"",.' ..... _.~_,.".y..". ";j',/,,,~""~";"",. -. ~)~ Administrative Secretary Director of Information TeChnology Services GIS Specialist GIS Supervisor Information Technology Support Manager Information Technology Support Specialist Operations & Telecommunications Manager Senior Applications Support Specialist Senior Information Technology Support Specialist Senior Programmer Analyst Telecommunications Specialist INebmaster ITS TOTAL ~~~~~~1 ", .. . . . ....., _,,__;_".'~__,__. ,,''-''.- ,".'../!!i' . <'~'" . . Administrative Secretary Assistant Director of Human Resources 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 26.00 ATTACHMENT C 1.00 1.00 1.00 (1.00) (1.00) (4.00) (100) (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (100) (16.00) 10.00 23.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 600 1.00 2.00 2.00 (1.00) 1.00 (2.00) (1 00) 1,00 2.00: 2'00" 1.00 (1.00) 1.00 1.00 (5.00) 19.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 9-29 1.00 100 1.00 (100) ATTACHMENT C Benefits Manager Benefits Technician Director of Human Resources Fiscal Office Specialist Human Rest;lurces Analyst Human Resources Operations Manager Human Resource~ Technician Principal Human Resources Analyst Risk Manager Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Human Resources Analyst Senior Risk Management Specialist HUMAN RESOURCES TOTAL ~~~~f"jr~~'~1j~~:I : . '_""'.,,,.",,,N""""~N_...'''''''~'''' "-', .",,)1"~,. , ,...c.".""."",' : '. ' ., .!l'~$"':""':~. '$<f'c;~k'" <" ~""""" -'-=':-<"~ht'.' ": ""~"';"";: Accounting Assistant Accounting Technician Assistant Director of Finance Associate Accountant Budget & Analysis Manager Business License Representative Director of Finance Fiscal & Management Analyst Fiscal Operations Manager Procurement Specialist Purchasing Agent Senior Accountant Senior Procurement Specialist Treasury Manager FINANCE TOTAL ~1~~0~jli~iI Animal Adoption Counselor Animal Care Assistant Animal Care Facility Manager Animal Control Officer Animal Control Officer Supervisor Office Specialist Registered Veterinary Technician Senior Animal Care Assistant Senior Office Specialist 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 20.50 (100) (0.50) (1.00) 1.00 (2.00) (4.50) 16.00 9.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 (1.00) 26.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 25.00 (1.00) (1.00) 1.00 1 75 6.00 1 00 400 1.00 3.50 2.00 1.00 1 00 9-30 1 5.00. 100' 4.00 1 00 3.50 2.00 2.00 1.00 ATTACHMENT C Veterinary Assistant 1.00 1:00 ANIMAL CARE FACILITY TOTAL 22.25 22.25 ~~ Administrative Technician 1.00 Advanced Planning Manager 1.00 Associate Planner 2.00 Code Enforcement Manager 1.00 Code Enforcement Officer 1/11 6.00 2.00 Deputy City Manager/Director of Development 1.00 Services Development Automation Specialist 1 00 Economic Development Officer 1.00 Planning Technician 2.00 Principal Economic Development Specialist 1.00 Principal Planner 2.00 Secretary 1.00 (1.00) Senior Administrative Secretary 1.00 Senior Code Enforcement Officer 2.00 Senior Office Specialist 1.00 Senior Planner 1.00 (1.00) Senior Planning Technician 1.00 Senior Project Coordinator 1.00 Senior Secretary 1.00 PLANNING & BUILDING SERVICES TOTAL 20.00 2.00 6.00 28.00 I~! ' ,". . _ ".,', ~_..:,,,~...:' ".,.>'.~..~" .",..'. """"'~.' .....--;L;.. Administrative Analyst 1/11 2.00 (2.00) Assistant Director of Engineering 1.00 (1.00) Assistant Surveyor 1/11 1.00 (1.00) Associate Engineer 9.00 (900) Building Project Manager 2.00 (2.00) Director of Engineering / City Engineer 1.00 (100) Engineering Technician 1/11 1.00 (1.00) land Surveyor 1.00 (1.00) Landscape Architect 0.50 (0.50) Principal Civil Engineer 2.00 (2.00) Principal Management Analyst 1 00 (1 00) Real Property Manager 1.00 (1.00) Secretary 100 (100) Senior Administrative Secretary 100 (100) 9-31 ATTACHMENT C Senior Civil Engineer Senior Engineering Technician Senior Office Specialist Signal Systems Engineer 1/11 Survey Technician 1111 ENGINEERING TOTAL ~"~i#i~!tw~.f;t:iii~Y~ Administrative Services Manager Chief of Police Civilian Background Investigator Community Service Officer Crime Laboratory Manager Detention Facility Manager Evidence Control Assistant Facility & Supply Specialist Forensics Specfalist Latent Print Examiner Office Specialist Parking Enforcement Officer Peace Officer Police Agent Police Captain Police Communications Systems Manager Police Community Relations Specialist Police Data Specialist Police Dispatcher Police Dispatcher Supervisor Police Lieutenant Po!;ce Records Specialist Police Records Transcriptionist Police Sergeant Police Services Officer Police Support Services Manager Police Technology Specialist Police Training and Development Supervisor Principal Management Analyst Public Information Officer (PO) Public Safety Analyst Range Master Secretary Senior Administrative Secretary 5.00 (5.00) 2.00 (2.00) 1.00 (1 00) 1.00 (1.00) 1 00 (1 00) 34.50 (34.50) 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.50 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 151 00 53.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 20.00 6.00 9.00 5.50 2.00 25.00 12.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (4.00) (1.00) (1.00) 1.00 (2.00) (500) (2.00) 100 5.00 0.50 400 1.00 (100) 100 (100) (1.50) 9-32 1.00 1.00 3.50 0.50 4.00 1.00 ATTACHMENT C Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Office Specialist Senior Police Data Specialist Senior Public Safety Analyst Training Programs Specialist POLICE TOTAL 337.50 1.00 (16.50) 322.00 ~~~.. . . .. ~"..".', - '. ''''~-'''. ',' - . ,- . ',~ " -~.', ".,.. ',. .-.""". Administrative Secretary Administrative Services Manager Assistant Fire Chief Deputy Fire Chief Division Chief Facility & Supply Specialist Fire Battalion Chief Fire Captain Fire Chief Fire Engineer Fire Inspector 1/11 Fire Marshal Fire Prevention Engineer Firefighter Office Specialist Public Safety Analyst Secretary Senior Fire Inspector Senior Office Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 34.00 1.00 35.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 42.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 135.00 (1.00) (1.00) FIRE TOTAL 1.00 136.00 ~~1l1;{({~~~~1t~ Administrative Analyst 1/11 Administrative Secretary Administrative Services Manager Animal Adoption Counselor Animal Care Assistant Animal Control Manager Animal Control Officer Animal Control Officer Supervisor Assistant Director of Engineering Assistant Director of Public Works Assistant Surveyor 1111 2.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.25 (1.25) 6.50 (650) 100 (100) 4.00 (400) 1.00 (100) 1 00 1 00 100 100 100 1 00 9-33 ATTACHMENT C Associate Engineer Building Project Manager 2.00 Carpenter 1.00 Construction & Repair Manager 1.00 Custodial & Facilities Manager 1.00 Custodial Supervisor 4.00 Custodian 14.50 (1.00) Director of Public Works 1.00 Electrician 3.00 (1 00) Electrician/Equipment Installer 1.00 Electronics Technician 2.00 Electronics Technician Supervisor 1.00 Engineering Technician 1/11 1.00 1.00 Environmental Health Specialist 2.00 Equipment Operator 3.00 (1.00) Fiscal Office Specialist 2.00 Gardener 1/11 25.00 (2.00) HVAC Technician 3.00 (100) Land Surveyor 1.00 Lead Custodian 7.00 Locksmith 2.00 Maintenance Worker 1/11 18.00 (5.00) Office Specialist 3.50 (3.50) Open Space Inspector 6.00 (100) Open Space Manager 1.00 Painter 2.00 (200) Parks & Open Space Manager 1.00 (100) Parks Manager 1.00 Parks Supervisor 5.00 Plumber 2.00 Principal Civil Engineer 1.00 2.00 Principal Management Analyst 100 Public Works Inspector I1II 6.00 Public Works Manager 2.00 (1.00) Public Works Specialist 3.00 3,00.. Public Works Supervisor 3.00 3:00. Pump Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 Pump Maintenance Technician 4.00 4.00 Real Property Manager 100 1 00 Registered Veterinary Technician 1.00 (100) Secretary 100 1.00 Senior Administrative Secretary 1.00 1 00 Senior Animal Care Assistant 1.00 (1 00) 9-34 ATIACHMENT C Senior Civil Engineer 1.00 5.00 Senior Electrician 1.00 (1.00) Senior Engineering Technician 2.00 Senior Fiscal Office Speciaiist 2.00 Senior Gardener 9.00 Senior HV AC Technician 1.00 Senior Landscape Inspector 1.00 Senior Maintenance Worker 14.00 (3.00) Senior Office Specialist 2.00 (1.00) . Senior Open Space Inspector 1.00 Senior ParI<. Ranger 1.00 Senior Public Worl<.s Inspector 2.00 Senior Public Worl<.s Specialist 1.00 Senior Secretary 1 00 Senior Tree Trimmer 2.00 Signal Systems Engineer 1111 1.00 Signing & Striping Supervisor 1.00 Stormwater Compliance Inspector 1/11 2.00 (1.00) Survey Technician ill! 1.00 Traffic Devices Technician 4.00 (1.00) Traffic Devices Technician Supervisor 1.00 Tree Trimmer 3.00 (1.00) Tree Trimmer Supervisor 1.00 Wastewater Collections Manager 1.00 PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL 194.75 (0.25) 194.50 ~"j~~~~~~jH~~~'n~ ' ' "c~"...'...,'>'~,<:" ""'"',_.":""_''''.- ..-c, ., ,f .". .:~.,',;<<'.. , ' Administrative Secretary 2.00 (1.00) Aquarist 0.75 (075) Aquatic Supervisor I 1.00 Aquatic Supervisor II 2.00 AquatiC Supervisor III 1.00 Assistant Director Of Recreation 1.00 (1.00) Director of Recreation 1.00 1.00 Fiscal & Management Analyst 100 Nature Center Grounds Maintenance Specialist 1.00 (1 00) Nature Center Grounds Maintenance Worker 1.00 (100) Nature Center Program Manager 3.00 (300) Principal Recreation Manager 2.00 2.00 Recreation S upervlsor I 600 6.00 Recreation Supervisor II 6.00 (2.00) 4.00 Recreation Supervisor III 7.00 (100) 6,00 9-35 ATTACHMENT C Registered Veterinary Technician 0.75 (0.75) Senior Fiscal Office Specialist 1.00 Senior Office Specialist 1.00 (1.00) Senior Recreation Manager 1.00 (1.00) RECREATION TOTAL 38.50 (12.50) 26.00 ~~"~"T~~l~~rl .. :'. ':'i:"-<;'-"",,-~\f~r"~I1j~~"~'~,,iP:-,: ; - " ~':"_;'::.," .' .,;' ii,' '_.~:i.""':~':~r:-_ ,", :., _._~~""~. _C-, '- '-' . . "''''0- Administrative Secretary 1.00 Assistant Library Director 1.00 (100) Delivery Driver 1 00 (0.50) Director of Library 1.00 Educational Services Supervisor 3.00 (3.00) Family and Youth Coordinator 1.00 Librarian 1111 8.00 (1.00) Librarian III 4.00 1.00 Library Administrative Coordinator 1.00 Library Assistant 0.50 Library Associate 15.75 Library Digital Services Manager 1.00 Library Technician 2.00 Library Volunteer Coordinator 0.50 Literacy & Programming Coordinator 1.00 (1.00) Principal Librarian 2.00 (1.00) Secretary 1.00 Senior Educational Services Supervisor 1 00 (1.00) Senior Librarian 3.00 (1.00) Senior Office Specialist 2.00 (2.00) LIBRARY TOTAL 50.75 (10.50) 40.25 ~or~~~~'~ ...,._. ... . '. " '",j""....~r,,.''' Administrative Technician Assistant Director of Building & Housing Assistant Director of Planning Assistant Planner Associate Engineer Associate Planner Building Inspector I/il Building Inspector III 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 500 7.00 100 9-36 1.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 ATTACHMENTC Deputy Building Official 1 00 .1,00 Development Automation Specialist 1.00 (1.00) Development Planning Manager 100 Development Services Counter Manager 1.00 (1.00) Development Services Technician 111I 4.50 (2.50) Development Services Technician III 3.00 (1.00) Director of Planning & Building 1.00 (1.00) Engineering Technician llil 1.00 Landscape Architect 1.00 Landscape Planner 1I11 3.00 Office Specialist 0.50 (0.50) Plans Examiner 3.00 Principal Planner 3.00 (1.00) Public Works Inspector 111I 5.00 (5.00) Secretary 1.00 Senior Administrative Secretacy 1.00 (1.00) Senior Building Inspector 1.00 Senior Civil Engineer 3.00 (2.00) Senior Engineering Technician 1.00 Senior Landscape Inspector 1.00 (100) Senior Office Specialist 1,00 Senior Planner 5.00 (100) Senior Plans Examiner 1.00 (1.00) Senior Public Works Inspector 3.00 (3.00) Senior Secretary 2.00 (2.00) Transportation Engineer w/Certificate 1.00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUND TOTAL 70.00 (10.50) (20.50) 39.00 ~,,'5~;''1'I$lI~~jl;'\!I>~ ..... >. '. .... _g'^;t\'~~;;-';i~(~;::,~~~~..j.o,~-'--'a.;<_t'g'J{/":~- Parking Meter Technician 0.50 (0.50) PARKING METER TOTAL 0.50 (0.50) :;~~~~. ,-'" - ,- ";;"-jj:~~~,:;:;,o:~:"" CBAG Administrative Analyst II 1.00 1.00 CBAG Analyst 3.00 3.00, CBAG Budget Manager 1 00 (1.00) CBAG Deputy Executive Director 1.00 1.00 CBAG Director of SD LECC 1.00 1.00 CBAG Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 CBAG Executive Director 1.00 100 CBAG Graphic Designer/Webmaster 1.00 100 9-37 ATTACHMENT C CBAG Lead Programmer Analyst 1.00 (1.00) CBAG Management Assistant 1 00 CBAG Micro Computer Specialist 1.00 CBAG Network Administrator 1111 2.00 CBAG Network Manager 1.00 CBAG Program Analyst 1.00 CBAG Program Manager 2.00 CBAG RCFL Network Engineer 1.00 Peace Officer 1.00 Police Community Relations Specialist 1.00 Police Training and Development Supervisor 1.00 Public Information Officer (PO) 1 00 Public Safety Analyst 050 POLICE DEPT GRANTS FUND TOTAL 21.00 1.50 22.50 ~~Etlmtj Environmental Services Program Manager Recycling Specialist 1111 1.00 2.00 1.00 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES TOTAL 3.00 1.00 4.00 mn1~i~i~~I'ii'~~~YiJ Equipment Maintenance Manager Equipment Mechanic Fire Apparatus Mechanic Fiscal Office Specialist Fleet Manager Mechanic Assistant Senior Equipment Mechanic 100 3.00 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 1.00 2.00 1.00 10.00 FLEET MANAGEMENT TOTAL 10.00. ~iil~F~~"'~!~~';i,l.l - ... ,. __ _1~~1':0"~:<~,~:,.,:.<<,,.1:~~ .,H;','-!~.'.';'~~':~:;:::,}.... ''-'' h'r-'1L Administrative Technician Transit Manager Transit Operations Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 TRANSIT TOTAL 3.00 ~:n~3~t~~~~~t~l'Nltt~~ti~~f:j Associate Engineer Engineering Technician 1/11 2.00 2.00 9-38 1.00 100 3.00 2.00 2.00 ATTACHMENT C Equipment Operator Maintenance Worker 111I Public Works Specialist Public Works Supervisor Senior Civil Engineer Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Maintenance Worker SEWER TOTAL _." ..;. 0 ".'~~. . ... ',' ",'.7 f.,~""';;"".""'" .. Accountant Assistant Director of Redevelopment and Housing Director of Redevelopment and Housing (formerly Director of Community Development) Principal Project Coordinator Project Coordinator I1II Redevelopment and Housing Manager Senior Administrative Secretary Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Project Coordinator Senior Secretary 3.00 18.00 1.00 400 1.00 1.00 14.00 46.00 46.00 REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING TOTAL 2.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 17.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (1.00) (1.00) (2.00) (1.00) (1.00) (6.00) TOTAL AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 1,109.50 (6.50) (98.00)_ 1,005.00 _ ------...- - 11.00 ""FY 2009-10 Proposed Changes column includes implementation ofthe budget reduction plan, reorganization of Development & Maintenance services and Administration, various reclassifications, and new positions. 9-39 Summary 01' Rr,commended Changes From Initial Proposed Budget Document Submitted to Council on May 22, 2009 Non-Departmental Reallocate expenditures to Nature Center for 6 months $ (218,000) $ 218,000 Recreation Reallocate expenditures to Nature Center for 6 months $ 218,000 $ (218,000) Non-Departmental Reelass Animal Care Assistant to Sr Animal Care Assistant $ (5,052) $ 5,052 Animal Care Facility Reelass Animal Care Assistant to Sr Animal Care Assistant $ 5,052 $ (5,052) Library Allocate Revenue and Expenditures for Heritage Musuem $ 1,600 $ 1,600 $ Police Funding for South Bay Youth Counseling (from Asset Seizure) $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ SUBTOTAL GENERAL FUND ADJUSTMENTS $ 121,600 $ 121,600 $ lii CD 652 - 2000 TABs Close out Fund and Merge with Fund 653 (due to refunding) $ 45,000 $ (45,000) I .po 653 - 2008 TABS Close out Fund and Merge with Fund 653 (due to refunding) $ 45,000 $ 45,000 C> 391 - Fleet Remove revenue and expense related to Fire Generators $ (15,000) $ (15,000) $ 241 - Parking Meter Increase Other Contractual Services by $6k $ 6,000 $ (6,000) 256 - Asset Seizure South Bay Youth Counseling $ 120,000 $ (120,000) 245 - Traffic Safety Fund Police Vehicles $ 462,700 $ (462,700) 274 - CDBG Fund 3rd Avenue Streetscape elP $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 227 - Transnet Eliminated Project STM367 $ (200,000) $ 200,000 SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS ADJUSTMENTS $ 530,000 $ 918,700 $ (388,700) }> --< :;; 0 I ;;:: m Z --< 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS FOR THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA EXCLUDING CAPITAL PROJECTS LB143, STM355, AND TF344, AND THE INTERFUND LOAN FROM THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND TO THE PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT FEE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 A1'lD APPROPRLa..TING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista received and considered the City Manager's proposed operating and capital improvement budget for the City of Chula Vista for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010; and WHEREAS, work sessions were held on November 17, 2008, December 4, 2008, January 13, 2009 and May 12, 2009 to consider and deliberate on the recommendations contained in the proposed budgets; and \VHEREAS, the budget submitted at this time for formal adoption represents the City Manager's proposed budget, as presented in the Fiscal Year 2009/10 proposed budget document, amended to reflect various budget items that address miscellaneous clean up changes, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the budget was noticed and held as required by the City Charter, and all public testimony was received and considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby adopt the Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the City of Chula Vista excluding Capital Projects LB143, STM355, and TF344 and the interfund loan from the Transportation Development Impact Fee fund to the Public Facilities Impact Fee fund for Fiscal Year 2009/10. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approves the appropriation of funds for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. Approved as to form by ,f', , , ---- ",-C, /2 ./ " '\. ,', I' (' ~ --i.( i 0111' ' .,ca .,~~~Jt~~id' , Presented by Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance/Treasurer 9-41 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR PROJECT LBl43 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 ANTI APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista received and considered the City Manager's proposed operating and capital improvement budget for the City of Chula Vista for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010; and WHEREAS, work sessions were held on November 17, 2008, December 4, 2008, January 13, 2009 and May 12, 2009 to consider and deliberate on the recommendations contained in the proposed budgets; and WHEREAS, the budget submitted at this time for formal adoption represents the City Manager's proposed budget, as presented in the Fiscal Year 2009/10 proposed budget document, amended to reflect various budget items that address miscellaneous clean up changes, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the budget was noticed and held as required by the City Charter, and all public testimony was received and considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby adopt the Capital Improvement Budget for Project LB 143 for Fiscal Year 2009/1 O. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approves the appropriation of funds for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. Presented by Approved as to form by -- /- --Jl.J ~-" . ,"",' , I , \, (2' /7) 'oL' / L', " 'A_'€. ,([~~ ~~J!teld/ Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance/Treasurer 9-42 RESOLUTION NO, 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR PROJECT STM355 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista received and considered the City Manager's proposed operating and capital improvement budget for the City of Chula Vista for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010; and WHEREAS, work sessions were held on November 17, 2008, December 4, 2008, January 13, 2009 and May 12, 2009 to consider and deliberate on the recommendations contained in the proposed budgets; and WHEREAS, the budget submitted at this time for formal adoption represents the City Manager's proposed budget, as presented in the Fiscal Year 2009/1 0 proposed budget document, amended to reflect various budget items that address miscellaneous clean up changes, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the budget was noticed and held as required by the City Charter, and all public testimony was received and considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby adopt the Capital Improvement Budget for Project STM355 for Fiscal Year 2009/10. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approves the appropriation of funds for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. Approved as to form by , /-, ! (, " '\ ,'~h !: a. ' .; ,'.I f'IIVa: 'i2t.t.. J , .' ..ttf"" " "~. ,/ ;:>'Biiit C:;1 iesfe1d ~'1'city Attorney Presented by Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance/Treasurer 9-43 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR PROJECT TF344 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/1 0 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 20 I 0 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista received and considered the City Manager's proposed operating and capital improvement budget for the City of Chula Vista for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010; and WHEREAS, work sessions were held on November 17,2008, December 4,2008, January 13, 2009 and May 12, 2009 to consider and deliberate on the recommendations contained in the proposed budgets; and WHEREAS, the budget submitted at this time for formal adoption represents the City Manager's proposed budget, as presented in the Fiscal Year 2009/1 0 proposed budget document, amended to reflect various budget items that address miscellaneous clean up changes, a copy of which is on file in the Otlice of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the budget was noticed and held as required by the City Charter, and all public testimony was received and considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby adopt the Capital Improvement Budget for Project TF344 for Fiscal Year 2009/10. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approves the appropriation of funds for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance/Treasurer Approved as to form by , f i '" --, i 'l (. ,",,-I,' -. ;. ."- \) !/ (1' (.Le rBart C:Miesfe1d ' . ~,Atto~~yJ . Presented by 9-44 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE BUDGET FOR AN INTERFUND LOAN FROM THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND TO THE PUBLICF ACILITIES IMPACT FEE FUND AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010. WHEREAS, due to the severity of the housing crisis, it is clear that the PFDIF fund will be unable to meet its annual debt obligations for the next few years; and WHEREAS, in order to avoid an impact to the General Fund, the fiscal year 2009/10 proposed budget includes an interfund loan from the TDIF to the PFDIF fund for $5.3 million to make the debt service payments scheduled for fiscal year 2009/2010; and WHEREAS, this will provide the City an opportunity to work through a restructuring of the PFDIF debt obligations with the objective of creating cash flow savings to meet debt obligations over the next few years; and WHEREAS, approving an interfund loan would alleviate the General Fund of having to step in and pay the PFDIF debt obligation of $5.3 million and avoid a significant impact to the General Fund reserves; and WHEREAS, the interfund loan of $5.3 million would reduce the cash balance in the TDIF fund by the same amount; and WHEREAS, the funds would be paid back from the PFDIF over thirteen years beginning in Fiscal Year 2012/2013 at the interest rate available when the loan is posted (based on the pooled fund rate); and WHEREAS, based on the schedule of projects and anticipated timeframes for completion, the interfund loan may delay TDIF projects from being constructed as planned; and WHEREAS, if the PFDIF fund is unable to pay the interfund loan back to the TDIF fund in a timely manner, then the General Fund would be obligated to pay the outstanding balance; and WHEREAS, the additional costs would be incorporated into the next PFDIF fee update; and WHEREAS, the Fina.l1ce Department will review the refunding and restructuring options of the outstanding COPs with the objective of providing long-term cash flow relief; and 9-45 WHEREAS, the loan will not be processed in the full amount if there are sufficient savings from the debt refunding and restructuring and/or development increases and sufficient revenues are realized. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the budget for an interfund loan from the Transportation Development Impact Fee fund to the Public Facilities Impact Fee fund. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approves the appropriation of funds for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. Presented by A~oved as to form by , (i \.. I . \ ~ /!' 1.,/),1) J>! [ .-<.i~/ Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance/Treasurer 9-46 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AJ\.1ENDING THE COMPENSATION SCHEDULE Al",n CLASSIFICATION PLAN TO REFLECT THE ADDITION AND ELIMINATION OF V ARIOUS POSITION TITLES AS REFLECTED IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 OPERATING BUDGET WHEREAS, the Recommended Expenditures by Department and Category, which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, summarizes the City Manager's proposed Fiscal Year 2009/10 budget; and WHEREAS, the dollar amounts shown include all amendments and/or adjustments approved by Council subsequent to the printing of the proposed budget document and various clean up items which are presented below; and WHEREAS, the total number of recommended permanent positions is 1,005 for Fiscal Year 2009/10, a net reduction of 98 positions from the Fiscal Year 2008/09 amended budget; and WHEREAS, the document entitled Authorized Positions by Department, which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, summarizes the fmal recommended position counts by department and fund for Fiscal Year 2009/10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby amend the Compensation Schedule and Classification Plan to reflect the addition and elimination of various position titles as reflected in the Fiscal Year 2009/1 0 operating budget Presented by Approved as to form by .---", Kelley Bacon Director of Human Resources ('; J !(j 9-47 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE OPERATING Ai'JD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE SOUTHWEST/TOWNE CENTER II/OTA Y VALLEY/ADDED AREA PROJECT AREA FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista has received and considered the City Manager's proposed operating and capital improvement budget for the Redevelopment Agency for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010; and WHEREAS, work sessions were held on November 17, 2008, December 4, 2008, January 13, 2009 and May 12, 2009 to consider and deliberate on the recommendations contained in the proposed budgets; and WHEREAS, the budget submitted at this time for formal adoption represents the City Manager's proposed budget, as presented in the Fiscal Year 2009/1 0 proposed budget document, amended to reflect various budget items that address miscellaneous clean up changes, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the budget was noticed and held as required by the City Charter, and all public testimony was received and considered; and WHEREAS, the Housing Fund expenditures for planning an administration are necessary for the production, improvement or preservation of affordable housing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista does hereby adopt the Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the Southwest/Towne Center II/Otay Valley/Added Area Project Area for Fiscal Year 2009/10. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista approves the appropriation of funds for the fiscal year ending June 30, 20ID. .' Approved as to/form by oJ' " " ,," ~ \, \ ,i i r ,,:,1' I,N1d, ~!jJ Attom"'h . I Presented by Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance/Treasurer 9-48 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE TOWNE CENTER I A1'ID THE BA YFRONT PROJECT AREAS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 A1'ID APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista has received and considered the City Manager's proposed operating and capital improvement budget for the Redevelopment Agency for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010; and WHEREAS, work sessions were held on November 17, 2008, December 4, 2008, January 13, 2009 and May 12, 2009 to consider and deliberate on the recommendations contained in the proposed budgets; and WHEREAS, the budget submitted at this time for formal adoption represents the City Manager's proposed budget, as presented in the Fiscal Year 2009/10 proposed budget doclUllent, amended to reflect various budget items that address miscellaneous clean up changes, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the budget was noticed and held as required by the City Charter, and all public testimony was received and considered; and WHEREAS, the Housing Fund expenditures for planning an administration are necessary for the production, improvement or preservation of affordable housing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista does hereby adopt the Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the Towne Center I and Bayfront Project Areas for Fiscal Year 2009/10. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista approves the appropriation of funds for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance/T reasurer Approved as to form by -~J /~ " . \. .-::' ; ,Iv( A \...__.B'~j ~ id f,\CfJ Attorney Presented by 9-49 RESOLUTION NO. 2009- RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 AL'ID APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 WHEREAS, the Housing Authority of the City of Chula Vista has received and considered the City Manager's proposed operating budget for the Housing Authority for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010; and WHEREAS, work sessions were held on November 17, 2008, December 4, 2008, January 13, 2009 and May 12, 2009 to consider and deliberate on the recommendations contained in the proposed budgets; and WHEREAS, the budget submitted at this time for formal adoption represents the City Manager's proposed budget, as presented in the Fiscal Year 2009/1 0 proposed budget document, amended to reflect various budget items that address miscellaneous clean up changes, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the budget was noticed and held as required by the City Charter, and all public testimony was received and considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Housing Authority of the City of Chula Vista does hereby adopt the Operating Budget for the Housing Authority for Fiscal Year 2009/1 O. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Housing Authority of the City of Chula Vista approves the appropriation of funds for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. Approved as to form by ~, ,/-\ i r- " : ',-1'/' /' r ) i A l-;0l'\\;c~d!LU /- Bart C. Mle's'feidFl,,-{~ ' .-t(;\:ity Attofuey\ Presented by Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance/Treasurer 9-50 ORDINANCE NO.- ORDINAc"1CE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Ac\J!ENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.05.010 RELATING TO THE ESTABLISlli\J!ENT OF UNCLASSIFIED POSITIONS TO ELHvIINA TE THE FOLLOWING TITLES - ANIMAL CONTROL MN"1AGER, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF BUDGET AND Ac"1AL YSIS, ASSISTAc"1T DIRECTOR OF BUILDING Ac"1D HOUSING, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF HUMN"1 RESOURCES, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLAc"1NING, ASSISTAc"1T DIRECTOR OF RECREATION, ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF, ASSISTANT LIBRARY DIRECTOR, CBAG BUDGET MANAGER, CBAG LEAD PROGRA1\J!MER Ac"1AL YST, CHIEF OF STAFF, COASTAL! ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY CONSULTANT, DIRECTOR OF BUDGET Ac"1D Ac"1AL YSIS, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICA TroNS, EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER, GOVERNMENT RELATIONS LIAISON, PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MN"1AGER, Ac"1D SPECIAL PROJECTS MAc"1AGER; AND TO ADD THE FOLLOWING TITLES - ANIMAL CARE FACILITY MANAGER, BUDGET Ac"1D ANALYSIS MANAGER, COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR, DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF, Ac"1D FIRE DIVISION CHIEF WHEREAS, the Human Resources Department has created new classifications to better reflect the needs of the City's workforce; and WHEREAS, Chula Vista City Charter Section 500(a) requires that all new unclassified management level positions be adopted by ordinance and a four-fifths vote of the Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION I: That Section 2.05.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code IS hereby amended as follows: 2.05.10 Unclassified positions established. In addition to those unclassified positions specifically delineated in Section 500 f the Charter of the City, there are established the unclassified positions entitled Administrative Services Manager, Advanced Planning Manager, Animal Care Facilitv Manager. /.nimal Coatrol MaaaGer, Assistant Chief of Police, :\ssistant 9-51 Director of Budget and :\nalysis, .^.ssistant Director of Building and Housing, Assistant Director of Engineering, Assistant Director of Finance, .^.ssistant Director of Human Reso\H"ces, :\ssistant Director of PlanniRg, Assistant Director of Public Works, /.ssbtant Director of Recreation, Assistant Director of Redevelopment and Housing, .^.ssistant Fire Chief, .^.ssistaat Library Director, California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) Deputy Executive Director, CBAG Director - SD LECC, CBAG Administrative Analyst I, CBAG Administrative Analyst II, CBAG Analyst, CB/.G Budget Manager, CBAG Executive Assistant, CBAG Executive Director, CBAG Graphics Designer/Webmaster, CR\G Lead Programmer /.nalyst, CBAG Management Assistant, CBAG Microcomputer Specialist, CBAG Network Administrator I, CBAG Network Administrator II, CBAG Network Manager, CBAG Program Analyst, CBAG Program Manager, CBAG Regional Computer Forensic Laboratory Network Engineer, Chief of Staff, City Engineer, Coastal/EnyirolliRental Policy CORsultant, Communications Coordinator, Constituent Services Manager, Deputy Building Official, Deputy City Manager, Deputv Fire Chief, Development Planning Manager, Direetor of Budget and .^.nalysis, Direetor of CommunicatioRs, Director of Conservation and Environmental Services, Economic Development Officer, Exeeutiye .^.ssistant to the Cit:" )'1anager, Fire Division Chief. Fiscal Operations Manager, Goyernment Relations Liaison, Human Resources Operations Manager, Office Specialist (Mayor's Office), Parks and OpeR Spaee Manager, Police Captain, Purchasing Agent, Real Property Manager, Redevelopment and Housing Manager, Risk Manager, Senior Council Assistant, Speeial Projects Manager, Traffic Engineer, Transit Coordinator, Transit Manager, Treasury Manager. SECTION II: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty days from its adoption. Presented by Approved as to fOl}ll by /' '-~~., /'_,\ ! .f .. 'l if / . /1 . k.: 1)',' ) , ....-.... >.i I (J (I .. ,@ ( ./7" I ~. ..:+tt.~~~:;ercP\.= / '., :kC(~ Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance/Treasurer 9-52 ,~ ',' ~, , ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "@~'\7 @} ~~" ~~ CO) [fDCQ) ~ [E[j) [B3 (LJJ [J)(G [EJr [FV1(0)(o)~= ~(O) <, '" . . " . :~, . . .~' .' ' '} >1 !~" "t;~J,/ '!,~~;'1 ,--" :1. ,:' r.. ~I ;:~~~:t < .,,' "~l; "r'i~"f1..mn;", ; ',,' "JJj"W<lLf:},~ W :n,~,(l,ID 0 ,~fl)O~ij~~J? ~,fl,6,)'.r":" .- -1 , ;r. ,~~r'~"" :'l>~ ~,i~:>~'-' . ""', . :,':':l:~: , ..,- . ~ .' ""'" '. ,i . ~': - . ;:~~;..1h- :,~;>/,l1 '," '~ i ,';~.r .,. i, ' .,':, ,\,,,:, I,,\',!,iC;'...., . ,.' ,:t ,.;~ "~.. ,.; '.;~. 'i..... .~r,} "'~:I:. J,,,', .r', . ,~i1'~~~~~'~ \~f;.!~:~::.,<J.~ ;.is:' ;;' :~~'~/;"~'~' '<:', i,'" :1.1;',; .'~ ~., t, "I "'. ,1,' . IJ' ."n ,,>'" t. 1" ;i~f;:~ w~i'l:g,,'~~';;< ,. ~:~:.'.;,;, ';:" .:: ' "~r't""I'IU,,,.r'lW-., ~"'f>;p.~1,.~)"'1."r.;,.~~~~,.e, ;~!~~;t;.~:l;'~';f:~~.;~~';;~~i~r:/:"::'~- ;.."~t;f;:f ~::~,'.:~:':. ~'. '-~/-;~;;:~" , jlij':' , ,: '. "eU:~ "R ,I' , 11.., "'I~'f. ,:' ," , ~l'~J:i;';',., 'ai":~'v,,,,,, ,ct~ ;,~,,: !i~( ," :'1t~i;~'~~l~!r:~;::,~~f~;rt;;~ '\:~:~::,>~'~ " ': ':lii ':!i;(';:;\ik.~~~~':'f~i;;;::i'frfr~i,,:!,:, , : ";c"., t(, ""';;::"l """;'!"':l'i:':'~""",,,,,,:!~ ,~~''''\, I' ',i',. '::, \ '"".j"" ."' .. ' "'I"~'l'll,t, ,r d' ,t ' " "-",:l" >t!' .!, , ", ; .~ '. ." 1'"" ':'1'1,. '/,,,,' <tt"'~~ v v '11 .." ./~;:" "';;~:~.:;;", i;;~;~;: ';!'~~~:1:,: ,\,1;:-:., ;'; ''', '; .. '~I" L"" '/."',,!, ::,;',1"'" '__'"""".,1.., "i,pl ""t. ~:';.,r.. 1 ...~jj;. IJf-I'd' "1:" :j 11'~~I1, ,':, ,1 /1 -"." 1; "'.J~~:Pit':!lt k.ll~ I". ,,:l r' '~l II ;pt,,';;''', ~111,;.:t ';~'l,' "'J,.';J;1>""';,ll,l '>>:'''", "~i w~, "'" 0:.. ,." ~" .1)'1'" ,:,~.,.", 'n "ti: .n: ,;'" :','I;,n'. "~! "P;~ ,gh\ " .~'" "'1 ' 'l~ ' . ,j:!.;i'; t '.lr,," ~ -j :/'1 '1" 5;; ":', )'!i""if'''''''I::'l~' ~"1 II: '1~}"'~lr':"ruJ:,,,~ ,Ii,i. '''C,', ',-,.J,:' ",n'I'1:,""., "t' .~, ,,;, "':"'''iiI]'' 'r"" .., . I "1..' """~r:~:~?;< ;,11~ :.,,~:.' , t ~.._ ,,)' j,;;"'ltj ~.'" '. ,.,,~, ,.,.>:,;.'>\ f, ,~,~~.. , '. " ,fi;,'" ',,, '.. , "( I' . '~:'il~!:> . .: ;,'i~L:-,:.' ~ '-;';Ii:;~: i.~' ..,' I "Jr~~,:.'.,.',.."v,.,.~.,:;r,ll,;!).,l\?:,:"::i',,, ""~,"ii ;acl1:" "" ),1,' ".:.) " ,. , '. " ,Ji f,' ,1.1,1. t;n~ (i' ',>, j' ': ~ J. ~ .. ';, " ., ,":" :.~!Il';ri, ' ,~ ." : ;;~j:':! !" : ':~ "l. t.l~' ,!'ii!t;: ' - 'FI' " . ,f~, ,I ' >;:,':: l!' , ' ! ~::;' :':1'.... ~ ,l! j, .t;~ ), , ",_. M: ,;.~;; ::. ,,~:: .,' I m~ :1' ,"~' ;~.l L ._.----:-~ ,~ , , . ",--..<< , , <<-~--_. ~ ~ It-- ~ ~ ---.-. CITY OF (HULA VISTA CHERYL COX MA YOR JOHN MCCANN DEPUTY MAYOR STEVE CASTANEDA COUNClLMEMBER RUDY RAMIREZ COUNClLMEMBER PAMELA BENSOUSSAN COUNCILMEMBER JAMES D. SANDOVAL City Manager DONNA NORRIS City Clerk BART MIESFELD City Attorney ~~~ ~ --....... --- ~ ""-................ CllY OF CHULA VISTA ADMINISTRATION James D. Sandoval Scott Tulloch Gary Halbert Leah Browder City Manager Assistant City Manager Deputy City Manager Deputy City Manager D I RECTORS Michael Meacham Maria Kachadoorian Dave.Hanneman Kelley Bacon Louie Vignapiano Richard P. Emerson Richard Hopkins Buck Martin Director of Conservation and Environmental Services Director of Finance Fire Chief Director of Human Resources Director of Information Technology Services Chief of Police Director of Public Works Director of Recreation Hi . , G' GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Distinguished Budget Presentation Award I'RES~;NTED TO City of Chula Vista California Prcsidt:nt Executive Direclor For the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2008 ~ /-. jCt ~~~ v ~~f?- ~ .....,.;: -...;: -...;: """ ...................~......... ..................."""'""""" CITY OF CHUlA VISTA ORGANIZATION CHART Citizen Advisory Commissions Citizen Advisory Boards Assistant City Manager Deputy City " Deputy City Manager Manager Police Human Planning & [ Library ] Resources Building Fire Information & Development Recreation Technology Svcs Services Administration Finance Redevelopment Animal Care Agency Facility Public Works Housing Authority vii TABLE OF CONTENTS BU DGET MESSAGE Transmittal Memo Economic Overview Summary of Budget Reductions Summary of Staffing Changes 1 3 11 15 29 39 41 51 59 77 85 87 95 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY General Fund Revenue Summary General Fund Expenditure Summary Department Summary Reports DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUND REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING FUNDS Redevelopment Agency Funds Housing Authority Funds SEWER FU N DS TRANSIT FUNDS FLEET FUND CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS OTHER FUNDS 99 111 119 127 143 151 ix CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CiP) Capital Improvement Program Summary Revenue Summary Expenditure Summary Capital Improvement Projects Summary 183 185 189 193 201 205 207 213 231 239 247 261 263 267 271 285 289 291 293 297 303 SUMMARY TABLES Fund Appropriations by Department and Expenditure Category Schedule of Revenues Fund Balance Projections Schedule of Inter-fund Transfers Authorized Positions by Department APPENDIX Budget Process Fiscal Policies Investment Policies Debt Administration Gann Appropriation Limit Legal Debt Margin List of Acronyms Glossary Chula Vista at a Glance x :.(\ (j~ t ,r~ , ..." " .j -,,' '~, ~"', -, f ,,,.,~ ""r-- ;':' ,; ~:: .~ _...nh';;IilIJ :.:; r ':' iI, "...'-j/;: 'h f""? "I' "1 % I,'. l'rdl " "'.,, L ,I .'':1;, J- ,l,,~: 'i.w"'" ,,,..t..,".:;....:1 :; PROPOSED BUDGET BUDGET MESSAGE T ransm itta I Memo Economic Overview Summary of Budget Reductions Summary of Staffing Changes -1- ~C1lYOF ~ CHUIA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER MAY 26, 2009 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL In December 2007, the national economy officially entered a recession, now projected to be the worse since the Great Depression of 1929. This significant decline in economic activity has severely impacted all economic sectors including government agencies. The City of Chula Vista felt the effects of the recession earlier than most agencies primarily due to the rapid residential growth experienced during the past six years and the effects of the foreclosure crisis, which eventually spread across the Country. The City has been going through ongoing budget adjustments in an attempt to bring its expenditures in line with revenues as the economy continued to deteriorate. To follow is the operating budget and capital improvement program budget for fiscal year 2009-10 for your consideration. The General Fund operating budget reflects the implementation of the Budget Reduction Plan that identified the necessary cuts in order to bring ongoing expenditures in line with current revenue projections. BUDGET REDUCTION PLAN In the fiscal year 2008-09 First Quarter Financial Report to the City Council, staff identified a deficit of $4.0 million in the General Fund and projected that it would grow to approximately $20.0 million in fiscal year 2009-10. The deficit was due to the continued decline in the housing market and the overall deterioration of the local economy. In order to avoid a deficit in the current fiscal year and to begin identifying additional cuts necessary for fiscal year 2009-1 0, City departments began a comprehensive process to develop a budget reduction plan. This process began with briefings of city employees, labor groups, City Council and the media. Following the initial briefings was the establishment of an employee focus group to generate cost saving ideas and several community workshops were conducted to receive the public's input. The Budget Reduction Plan was presented to the City Council. in December 2008 and included the elimination of 166.5 positions. The Council approved the Budget Reduction Plan on January 13, 2009 at which time the implementation of a majority of the plan moved forward. -3- Since the approval of the Budget Reduction Plan, the number of positions proposed to be eliminated was reduced to 100.5 due to the elimination and/or deferral of the cost of living adjustments scheduled for January 2009 and January 2010 and additional funding identified for specific positions either from grants or the economic stimulus program. The elimination of these cost of living adjustments also helped to mitigate the projected deficit in the current fiscal year. The proposed fiscal year 2009-10 General Fund budget takes into account all position cuts and are presented in this document. A more detailed description of the budget reduction plan can be found in the Summary of Budget Reductions following this section. The Summary of Budget Reductions includes a summary of the staffing changes by department and bargaining group as well as an overview of the anticipated service impacts resulting from the implementation of the budget reduction plan. FISCAL HEALTH PLAN The Chula Vista Health Plan, which was endorsed by the City Council in January 2009, is comprised of four major parts and is an outline designed to position the City back to strong financial status on a long- term basis. I. Expenditure Cuts II. Revenues III. Economic Development IV. Budget and Fiscal Reforms Expenditure Cuts - The City began making significant expenditure cuts in fiscal year 2006-07 and has continued to do so in an attempt to avoid deficit spending. Including the cuts implemented with the Budget Reduction Plan, the total staff reductions by departments range from -9% to -64%. With the severe reduction in staffing levels citywide, an operational review is recommended to provide an unbiased analysis regarding staffing efficiencies. .Revenues - A comprehensive review of the MasterFee Schedule will begin in the summer to ensure that the City fees are set at appropriate levels. Economic Development - A critical element towards the City's long-term fiscal health is the continued development and diversification of the City's revenue base. Potential future growth areas include sales tax and transient occupancy tax from new and expanded commercial development in the City's Bay -4- front and through a Western Chula Vista Revitalization Program. Development of the Eastern Urban Center and the University and Technology Park will contribute towards the City's long-term fiscal stability by providing high paying local jobs. Budget and Fiscal Reforms - In addition to securing additional revenues, the proposed Fiscal Health Strategy recommends implementation of a number of budget reforms. The specific actions recommended include the following: . Detailed fiscal impact analysis of the short-term and long-term impacts of Council actions in staff reports (Implemented). . Cross-departmental analyst support (Implemented) . Update of General Fund Reserve Policy (In Progress) . Implementation of zero-based budgeting (Implementation to begin with the development of the fiscal year 2010-11 proposed budget) . Development of a City of Chula Vista Long-Term Financial Strategy for sustainability (In Progress) GENERAL FUND RESERVES The Council's General Fund minimum reserve level policy of 8%, which became effective in 1996, was established to prudently protect the fiscal solvency of the City. Reserves are important in order to mitigate the negative impact on revenues from economic fluctuations, to withstand State budget grabs and to fund unforeseen expenditure requirements. As evidenced by the chart below, the General Fund reserves were at 28.5% of the operating budget at the end of fiscal year 2001-02. The City's General Fund reserves placed the City in the enviable position to withstand the State's revenue cuts during fiscal years 2004 and 2005 and provided the City with the opportunity to reinvest back into the community Since 2006, primarily due to the significant slowdown in the housing market and the overall economy, the reserves dropped to 6.1 % at the end of fiscal year 2008. Based on the most current projections reported to the City Council in the Third Quarter Financial Report, it is anticipated that the General Fund reserves will stabilize at the 6.1 % level or $9.3 million. This is due to the implementation of the Budget Reduction Plan, which included layoffs, -5- as well as the implementation of an administrative freeze on all non-essential expenditures and a loan repayment to the General Fund from the Redevelopment Agency. As discussed under the Fiscal Health Plan section, an updated General Fund Reserve Policy is currently being drafted for Council consideration that will provide criteria and guidance on the use of reserves. 30% .,.. 5% ._.--_.~ ..-------- --------.--.------.~..-~-.--- ...-. . i -- --------..---...-.---------.-.- . ~ i: f-~ -----~ --;:-11 nf~ .' c. ,..,. 'f [" .': IJ :'.; ,': t' ~ - Ita -I~l ~ --- fi I'I..! "---ao/-r.;;t. -, - - ,.p - ~-.ti .f... I, - .~ _~__._.____ ~ ~ ~ " 10c"~,~ ..,.:fI. ~ !~? 111' '~~ :::~ ,"" '" ~ :.' f.J; ~ I' II, ~~ .! .~ I,;' '" ill .. I~I . .,,' f'~ rn'~l,," ,.,.. ~: ;:\:., , Ill-' :. ,r ;~ ....~ ":,,. ~I ld ,.,.. ":"i I <i'.,' ,," ,I" -- i'< ".j" 'ii ~ Ii ~,l" . ~ ~:~ I~ ;, tJ . ~,~ ,1j. 'i:J, ,~ k'" ~i' ~. ,., 11. -'! " " .'if!' , " ~ r" :J..t 'fC' , ~ ''1' -, , it, " <r.. ~ "-'-' ., c"" 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 9 25% 20% 15% 1 0% 0% 1989 1991 1993 1995 ALL FUNDS BUDGET OVERVIEW The combined revenue budget for all City funds totals $290.0 million; including $55.2 million in inter fund transfers. Revenues for fiscal year 2009~ 10 are projected to remain relatively fiat when compared to fiscal year 2008~09. The largest revenue source is Other Local Taxes, which represents 20.8% of the all funds budget. This category includes sales tax, franchise, utility, and business licenses taxes, as well transient occupancy tax. Transfers In From Other Funds (19.0%) represents the next largest revenue category, followed by Revenue from Other Agencies (16.0%) Charges for Services (14.7%), Property Taxes (145%), Other Revenue (11.3%), Use of Money (1.2%), Fines, Forfeitures, and Penalties (1.0%), Development Impact Fees (0.8%) and Licenses and Permits (0 7%). The combined expenditure budget for all City funds totals $298.9 million; $55.2 million represents interfund transfers. This amount includes a General Fund budget of $132.8 million and a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget of $30.4 million. Personnel Services (39.6%) represents the largest expenditure category, it includes funding for 1 ,005.0 positions in fiscal year 2009-10 budgeted in vari'ous funds. Transfers Out (18.5%) represents the next largest expenditure c'ategory followed by Services and Supplies (16.4%) Other Expenses (11.2%), Capital Improvement Project Expenditures (10.2%), Utilities (2.6%), Other Project Expenditures (0.9%), and Capital Expenses (0.6%) Total sources and uses of all City funds are summarized on the following two pages. ~6~ Sources of Funds Projected Revenues (In Thousands) Fiscal Year 2009-10 ""'OO!Eil!~J":i ;..... ,".',' 'ti'" ~:.~,~~'., Property Taxes $ 38,603 $ 43,100 $ 43,381 $ 41,925 $ 1,456 Other Local Taxes $ 53,438 $ 59,398 $ 53,723 $ 60,259 $ 6,536 Licenses and Permits $ 2,870 $ 2,768 $ 1,948 $ 2,029 $ 80 Fines, Forfeitures&Penalties $ 2,227 $ 2,672 $ 2,840 $ 3,048 $ 208 Use of Money $ 13,924 $ 17,769 $ 5,692 $ 3,384 $ 2,307 Rev. from Other Agencies $ 40,527 $ 50,384 $ 55,818 $ 46,345 $ (9,473 Charges for Services $ 48,112 $ 58,700 $ 46,871 $ 42,626 $ (4,245 Development Impact Fees $ 11,650 $ 5,637 $ 9,246 $ 2,271 $ (6,975 Other Revenue $ 62,221 $ 46,096 $ 33,404 $ 32,903 $ (501 Transfers In $ 53,901 $ 26,279 $ 36,687 $ 55,197 $ 18,511 Total All Funds Revenue $ 327,473 $ 312,803 $ 289,609 $ 289,988 $ 378 Total Revenues Fiscal Year 2009-10 Tranfers In 19% Property Taxes 14% Other Revenue 11% Other Local Taxes 21% Development Impact Fees 1% Licenses & Permits 1% Fines, Forf, Penalties :.---- 1% Other Agencies 16% \ l Use of $ and Prop 1% Charges for Svcs. 15% -7- Uses of Funds Operating Budget by Fund Type (In Thousands) Fiscal Year 2009-10 I,;i":,,. ......,.1:"..,. .,....2 ~.~ ..~. f?u{!I){!JlI& .< [j1fltIID'illl. '';C~i;;. ,;~, .rniij.~~ .,~'. Personnel Services $ 136,730 $ 134,311 $ 129,631 $ 118,357 $ 111,274) Supplies and Services $ 48,738 $ 51,198 $ 48,313 $ 49,114 $ 800 Other Expenses $ 63,726 $ 65,243 $ 40,586 $ 33,612 $ 16,974 Capital $ 2,587 $ 2,012 $ 2,558 $ 1,854 $ (704' Transfers Out $ 53,901 $ 26,279 $ 37,913 $ 55,197 $ 17,285 CIP Proiect Expenditures $ 36,619 S 31,709 S 25,617 $ 30,443 $ 4,826 Non-CIP Proiect Expenditures $ 775 $ 935 $ 2,300 $ 2,641 $ 341 Utilities $ 6,360 $ 6,281 $ 7,435 $ 7,728 $ 293 Net BudQet $ 349,437 $ 317,968 $ 294,354 $ 298,946 $ 4,592 Total Budget Fiscal Year 2009-10 Supplies and Services 16% Personnel Services 40% Other Expenses 11% Capital Expenses / (non CIP) 1% Transfers Out 18% Ut'I't' Other Project Illes . 3" Expenditures 10 1% CIP Project ---- Expenditures' 10% -8- The following table provides a summary by fund type of the projected revenues and expenditures for fiscal year 2009-10. Detailed descriptions, funding, and staffing levels are provided for each fund under the corresponding fund section in this document. As noted in the table below, the General Fund and Transit Fund are anticipated to be balanced in fiscal year 2009-10 with no impact to the reserves for these funds. The Sewer Fund and Development Services Fund are projected to increase their respective reserve balances while the Redevelopment Agency, Other Funds, Capital Project Funds, Debt Service Funds, and Fleet Management Funds are all anticipated to draw down reserves balances in fiscal year 2009-10 primarily due to loan repayments or use of capital project funds received in prior years. Summary of Net Impact to Reserves by Fund Fiscal Year 2009-10 (In Thousands) '=''''''''''''7''. " W:;~~~;~ "~f."'>-;q f?:'::ftll}t~L~'~}:;~;:, '""~'" ;:JT.'t,,,m=' >',J'~~" ~~ro<ilj. ".C:1l<liWii'lu:!) ';', General Fund $ 9,302 $ 132,844 $ 132,844 $ Develo ment Services Fund $ $ 5,858 $ 5,831 $ $ 6,189 $ 29,685 $ 30,487 $ Sewer Funds $ 54,457 $ 31,523 $ 29,261 $ Transit Funds $ 180 $ 1,738 $ 1,738 $ Other Funds $ 17,044 $ 45,707 $ 47,103 $ Ca ital Pro'eets Funds $ 56,967 $ 18,670 $ 27,372 $ Debt Service Funds $ 3,789 $ 19,973 $ 20,082 $ Fleet Mana ement $ 627 $ 3,988 $ 4,226 $ Total All Funds Bud et $ 140,976 $ 289,988 $ 298,946 $ Note; The Debt Service Funds carry a deficit that reflects lon9-term advances in Fund 451. $ 9,302 27 $ 27 802 $ 5,387 2,262 $ 56,719 $ 180 $ 15,648 $ 48,265 $ 3,898 $ 389 $ 132,018 .9. SUMMARY The proposed General Fund budget presented herein results in a balanced budget for fiscal year 2009- 10. However, due to the continued economic uncertainty I am continuing the hiring freeze to allow the City some flexibility to address unanticipated impacts that will minimize the potential for further layoffs. I recognize that the continuation of the hiring freeze will further impact service levels as fewer staff struggle to keep up with the service demands and expectations of a growing community however, I believe it is necessary given the economic uncertainty we are facing. A summary of the budget cuts that are anticipated to have the most significant impact on service levels is provided in this report. In closing, I want to reiterate my firm belief that despite our current budgetary challenges, the City of Chula Vista has a bright future. Chula Vista has several major economic development projects that put the City in a unique position of being able to pursue projects that will significantly expand the City's economic base. These projects include the Eastern Urban Center, the University Park and Research Center, and the development of the bay front. The implementation of the Budget Reduction Plan has resulted in some very difficult cuts which have an impact on service delivery. We are continuing to make changes citywide to ensure that we are working as efficiently as possible to deliver the best services we can with the resources we have available. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This document is the result of many months of effort on the part of all the members of this organization. Department Heads and their staff worked collaboratively with the Finance Department in preparing the recommendations contained within this document. Developing a fiscally sound budget that remains responsive to community needs and service expectations would not have been possible without their combined professionalism and teamwork. Respectfully submitted, James D. Sandoval City Manager -10- ECONOMIC OVERVIEW This section of the budget document identifies and outlines economic indicators that impact some of the City's major revenue projections. Several sources are used to forecast City revenues using national, state and local area economic trends. Sources include: the UCLA Anderson Forecast (National and State), U.S. Bureau of labor Statistics (National and San Diego region), California Department of Finance (State), and the University of San Diego Index of leading Economic Indicators (San Diego region) In December 2007, the naiional economy officially entered a recession, now projected to be the worse since 1929. This significant decline in economic activity has severely impacted all sectors including government agencies. In its first quarterly report of 2009, the UCLA Anderson Forecast linked the current national recession to slumping, international economic conditions that will impact the timing and pace of any national recovery. The Forecast asserts that a turnaround in the U.S. economy depends upon a recovery in world trade. The report also states that regardless of the steps taken by the U.S. government, national solutions will not be enough to restore grow1h and therefore global solutions are essential. In California,.it's forecasted that the economy will remain in turmoil for the foreseeable future as the twin sector engines of consumer and construction spending continue to drag. / '~'~~,~r---~'f ~ir.. .J'\R !'.....'t.....~\.\.f..<.'..' ,. ,', """\;''c?' r;\::r -:'-~-~fi\';? ;J"'~" ~';:::, )~1.I...,;\ .....' '.; " -11- The UCLA Anderson Forecast reports that real Growth Domestic Product (GDP) declined by 6.1 % in the fourth quarter of 2008 and foresees further declines of 6.8%, 4.5% and 1.7% in the first three quarters of 2009. As a result of the prolonged contraction, the nation's economy will likely lose 7.5 million jobs from its peak and unemployment will soar. UCLA Anderson Forecast predicts that the unemployment rate will peak at 10+% in mid-2010 and the employment recovery of the 2007-2009 recession will be "long and arduous. " Real Gross Domestic Product Growth I U.S. 200701 - 2009 01 percent change 6% ! ~~ l-IIIIIJlt-+",-~,J.I+=1 -2% ) ,4% j----- -6% ----"---"" -8% L_.. _~._,_ I .1.1.....'.'...1 _~1~ 200701 2007 03 2008 01 2008 03 2009 01 There are some positive signs, the Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index™, which had posted a slight increase in March, improved considerably in April. The Index now stands at 39,2, up from 26,9 in March, Consumer Confidence rose in April to its highest reading in 2009, driven primarily by a significant improvement in the short-term outlook, The Present Situation Index posted a moderate gain, a sign that conditions have not deteriorated further, and may even moderately improve, in the second quarter. The sharp increase in the Expectations Index suggests that consumers believe the economy is nearing a bottom, however, this Index still remains well below levels associated with strong economic growth, The U,S, Census Bureau estimates U,S retail sales for March, decreased by 1,1 percent from the previous month and 9.4 percent below March 2008, Total sales for the January through March 2009 period were down 8 8 percent from the same period a year ago, As stated by the UCLA Anderson Forecast, "the California economy has experienced a deeper downturn than the U,S, economy, Unemployment hit 11,2% in March and a further increase is expected in April. The rapid rise in unemployment is expected to abate as we move through 2009, The March forecast is for unemployment to reach a maximum of 11,9% and to stay in double digits through the forecast horizon of 2011 ," -12- The continued negative trends in employment numbers and the decline in housing values have created a negative impact on property taxes for state and local governments as well as other municipalities and school districts. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has indicated that the state is i! i i i i i i i i ! i i i currently facing the potential for a twenty one billion dollar budget deficit in fiscal year 2009-10. The downturn in the economy and the crisis in the housing market has lead to a severe financial crisis at the State level. The City of Chula Vista felt the effects of the recession ~ ~A earlier than most agencies primarily due to the rapid residential growth experienced during the past six years and the effects of the foreclosure crisis, which eventually spread across the Country. The University of San Diego's Index of Leading Economic Indicators for San Diego County fell 2.2 percent in March 2009. All six components in the Index, which include building permits, unemployment insurance, stock prices, consumer confidence, help wanted advertising and the national economy, were down at the end of March. The largest decline occurred in help wanted advertising (-4.65%) followed by sharp declines in consumer confidence (-3.27%) and unemployment insurance (-2.31 %). The USD Index has now fallen in 35 of the last 36 months. It was also the sixth month in a row that the Index declined by more than two percent, which corresponds to the six largest drops on record. The bad job growth numbers for February 2009 got worse in March 2009, with Sari Diego County losing more than 44,000 jobs compared to the year before Both the national and local economies are caught in a vicious cycle where job losses are reducing incomes, which reduces consumption, auto sales, and home sales, which in turn leads to even more job losses. ~v~ ~ C"~,m'. T~,. ~"orl".m Cal,f,,,,.. ___Soo'hOm c.,,,,,,,,,. _C~n".' Vall&y _c...p't., ,.. _c",," 150.0 145.0 140.0 135.0 130.0 125.0 . 120.0 . 115.0 . 110.0 105.0 100.0 95.0 Jan-03 Jan-Q4 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-OB Jan-09 San Diego Index of Leadin Economic Indicators '" ~ ."t '''''",,''',l "'''l.''''-', . , -13- In 2003, based on population estimates released by the Census Bureau, Chula Vista was identified as the 7th fastest growing city in the United States. The growth continued through 2006. By mid-2007 the mortgage crisis came to light and the City began experiencing a significant number of foreclosures. According to UCLA Anderson Forecast San Diego County Economic Outlook For 2009 Report, "Escondido and Chula Vista had the highest foreclosure rates at 13.4 and 12.4 foreclosures per 1,000 homes, respectively. Rates offoreclosures peaked in most areas sometime between October and December of 2008. All regions have shown declines in the rate of foreclosures between December 2008 and May 2009. " The Anderson forecast states that based on information received for the first three months of 2009, the bottom may have been reached in San Diego County. Foreclosures are having a significant negative impact on property tax revenues by depressing housing values. The drop in assessed values has triggered Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment passed in 1978 that allows a temporary reduction in assessed value when real property suffers a "decline-in-value". Therefore, as assessed values fall, homeowners can apply for a reassessment of their homes which would lead to a reduction of property taxes based on the lower assessment. A comparison of sales data for March 2008 to March 2009 reveals that prices have dropped dramatically from March 2008 levels. Recent sales data indicates that the median price drops range as high as 46.4 percent in the hardest hit areas of the City. Many of these downward reassessments may not yet appear on property tax bills requiring further adjustments to the fiscal outlook beyond fiscal year 2009-10. :;'; ;;;:.,U",' Mediari:'p,ric'e!'.;;:._; ." .2009~~ .' r~gt2008 $ 250,000 $ 330,000 $165,000 $ 308,000 $310,000 $391,000 $ 387,500 $ 496,000 $ 344,000 $ 391 ,500 , ~~ic;ent.,. . Ch,m' at -24.2% -46.4% -20.7% -219% -12.1% Zi 91910 91911 91913 91914 91915 North South Eastlaka NE SE Source: San Diego Union -14- SUMMARY OF BUDGET REDUCTIONS Since 2007 the City has gone through several budget reduction processes in an effort to keep expenditures in line with rapidly declining revenues. As discussed previously in this document, City revenues have been severely impacted by the slowdown in development, plummeting home values, a dramatic increase in foreclosures, and the national recession. In November 2008, staff informed the City Council of a projected $4.0 million budget deficit for fiscal year 2008-09 that was anticipated to grow to $20.0 million in fiscal year 2009-1 O. After a series of public meetings where Council considered the budget reduction plan, the City Council approved a mid-year budget reduction plan on January 13, 2009. The budget reduction plan reduced the City's annual net cost by $20.0 million and resulted in the elimination of over one hundred positions. These reductions are reflected in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget and impact all General Fund departments as well as the Redevelopment Agency and Development Services Fund. The budget reduction plan that was originally presented to Council included the elimination of 166.5 positions, however 49.0 positions were reinstated due to the elimination or deferral of the cost of living adjustments scheduled for January 2009 and January 2010 for the Chula Vista Employees Association, Police Officers Association, Western Council of Engineers, International Association of Firefighters, confidential and management employees. The plan was further amended as alternative sources of . . . funding, such as economic stimulus and grant funds, became available and positions were restored. In total 1 00.5 positions were eliminated from the fiscal year 2009-1 0 proposed budget. The following table summarizes the staffing reductions that are reflected in the fiscal year 2009-10 budget as well as the staffing reductions that have been made since fiscal year 2006-07 through other budget reduction processes by fund and department. -15- Summary of Staffing Changes by Department/Fund Redevelopment 14.00 (4.00) (500) (9.00) -64% Recreation & Nature Center 43.25 (4.75) (1350) (18.25) -42% Planning & Building 9150 (33.00) (5.50) (38.50) -42% Library 68.75 (1800) (10.50) (2850) -41% Administration 28.00 (2.00) (900) (11.00) -39% Human Resources 25.50 (5.00) (450) (9.50) -37% Engineering 74.00 (2150) (4.00) (2550) -34% Finance 33.50 (8.00) (3.00) (11.00) -33% ITS 28.00 (4.00) (500) (9.00) -32% City Attorney 14.00 (2.00) (2.00) (4.00) -29% City Clerk 850 (1.00) (100) (2.00) -24% Public Works 260 00 (1850) (23.50) (42.00) -16% City Council 1500 (1.00) (1.00) (2.00) -13% Fire 152.00 (17.00) (17.00) -11% Police 364.50 (25.00) (13.00) (38.00) -10% Animal Shelter 22.25 (2.00) (2.00) -9% CBAG 17.00 3.00 3.00 18% Housing 4.00 3.00 300 75% CITYWIDE TOTAL 1,263.75 (160.75) (100.50) (261.25) -21% Notes: Staffin9 totals for FY 2006-07 have been adjusted to reflect current program structures. Staffing figures for Public Works include positions budgeted in the General Fund, Development Services Fund, Fleet, Environmental Services, Transit, and Sewer funds. Staffing figures for Engineering include positions budgeted in the General Fund, Development Services Fund, and Sewer funds. Staffing figures for Planning and Building include positions budgeted in the General Fund and Development Services Fund. The table above shows that the largest percentage reduction was made in the Redevelopment Agency (64%). The next largest staffing reductions were made in the Recreation Department (42%), which reflects the elimination of the Nature Center, followed by the Planning and BuildinglDevelopment Services Fund (42%) and the Library Department (41 %). The smallest staffing reductions were made in Police (10%), Fire (11 %), and City Council (13%). The Fire Department reductions include the elimination of 11 Fire Dispatch positions. Fire dispatch services are now contracted from the City of San Diego. Excluding. the transition of Fire Dispatch, Fire Department staffing has been reduced by 4%. The City of Chula Vista serves as a fiscal agent for the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG), which is fully revenue offset. The increase in staffing in the Chula Vista Housing Authority reflects the transfer of staff from the former Community Development Department. -16- The following table summarizes the staffing reductions by bargaining unit or employee group. The management and professional group experienced the largest percentage reduction in staffing - Senior Managers decreased by 40%, Executive Managers decreased by 36%, Middle Managers decreased by 33%, and Professional employees decreased by 32%. The next highest percentage reduction was in the Chula Vista Employees' Association (CVEA), which was reduced by 25%. CVEA is the largest of the City's six collective bargaining units and experienced the largest reduction in the number of positions at 154.75. The smallest percent reductions are in public safety. The Chula Vista Police Officers' Association (POA) has been reduced by 14 positions or 6% and the International Association of Firefighters Local 2180 (IAFF) has been reduced by one position or 1 %. Summary of Staffing Changes by Bargaining Unit SENIOR MANAGERS EXECUTIVES MID MANAGERS PROFESSIONALS CVEA WCE CONF POA IAFF MAYOR & COUNCIL CITYWIDE TOTAL 48.00 25.00 64.00 85.50 609.25 3700 31.00 247.00 112.00 5.00 1,263.75 (8.00) (4.00) (16.00) (14.00) (99.75) (7.00) (4.00) (7.00) (1.00) (160.75) (11.00) (5.00) (500) (13.50) (55.00) (2.00) (200) (700) (100.50) (19.00) (900) (21.00) (2750) (154.75) (9.00) (6.00) (1400) (1.00) -40% -36% -33% -32% -25% -24% -19% -6% -1% 0% -21% (261.25) A list of the 100.5 positions eliminated through this budget reduction process can be found in the Summary of Staffing Changes section. SUMMARY OF SERVICE IMPACTS The development and implementation of the budget reduction plan was a major undertaking that will have many impacts on services to the community and City operations. To follow is a summary of some of the more significant budget reductions reflected in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget. The City's net cost were reduced by $20.0 million through the implementation of the budget reduction plan and the deferral or elimination of the cost of living adjustments scheduled for January 2009 and January 2010. This list is not all-inclusive but is meant to highlight some of the reductions that were necessary in order to balance the budget. -17- . Reduced staffing and other expenses in City Council Department - During the Council deliberations of the budget reduction plan, City Council identified reductions in the City Council budget that included the elimination of the Coastal and Environmental Policy Consultant position, the elimination of the Chief of Staff, the addition of a Senior Council Assistant and a reduction to the department's services and supplies budget . Reduced Recreation Services - The budget reduction plan includes the elimination of 13.5 positions from the Recreation Department To follow is a summary of the service impacts of these reductions by program: o Program Services - Eliminated diversionary programs and activities for middle school at- risk youth, potentially resulting in increased contacts with law enforcement. Significant reduction in public service levels at Norman Park Center; eliminated some senior and low- income programs such as blood pressure screenings. Eliminated the Information and Referral services at Norman Park Center, a diversified program that helped hundreds of seniors find assistance for housing, nutritional, financial, and other issues, as well as crisis intervention. Reduced funding in the Recreation Department also resulted in the elimination of the Therapeutics program. Developmentally and physically disabled clients may be unable to participate in certain programs due to transportation issues; these individuals require highly specialized programming that may not be available elsewhere locally. Recreation centers will be closed on Sunday, with the exception of Parkway Gym, there has also been a reduction or elimination of some drop-in and fee-free activities at recreation centers o Nature Center - The Nature Center is scheduled to close in July 2009 to the public. Staff continues to work with the Friends of the Nature Center to transition the operation of the Nature Center to a non-profit organization. The fiscal year 2009-1 0 budget includes limited funding to maintain operations at the Nature Center until it transitions to a non-profit in January 2010. o Administration - Administrative and supervisory responsibilities are being transferred to other areas, non-core functions will be deferred, and departmental representation in numerous community collaborative efforts will be eliminated. -18- . Reduced Library Services - The budget reduction plan includes the elimination of 10.5 positions from the Library Department. These staffing reductions impact Library Operations and the STRETCH and DASH programs, the service impacts are described below: o Branch Operations - The reduction in staffing in Library Operations will result in reduced hours of operation at all three branch libraries - in total, the hours of operation will be reduced by 26 hours per week. Due to the staffing changes this service model requires, the new hours of operation will be implemented in July 2009. In addition to reduced hours of operation, there has also been a reduction in funding for library resources and materials. Reduced funding also results in a significant reduction in programming, such as story times, foreclosure workshops, arts exhibits, classical guitar performances, and film festivals. Public outreach (community events, fliers, posters, news releases, calendars) will be limited. o Transfer of STRETCH and DASH programs - As a result of the transfer of the STRETCH and DASH programs to the YMCA the City will no longer operate the 7 STRETCH and 22 DASH sites. This eliminates 5.0 permanent positions and over 150 part-time hourly employees. . Reduced Public Works Services - As part of the reorganizations put in place during fiscal year 2008-09, the Engineering Department was dissolved with most sections being merged with the Public Works Department. This reorganization resulted in the elimination of the Director of Engineering, an executive management position. In total, the Public Works Department (including Engineering) staffing has been reduced by 24.5 positions. Reductions in this department include the following: o Construction and Repair Program - Eliminating five positions eliminates painting, stucco and drywall repairs for City buildings. It will also delay responses to complaints and electrical repairs (most notably those associated with exposed wiring or copper wire thefts throughout the City). o Traffic Signal and Street Light Program - The elimination of a position in this program impacts preventative maintenance (PM) for traffic signals citywide. PM's benefit the City in the long-term by reducing maintenance costs. This cut may result in a potential increase in malfunctions of traffic signals, thereby causing traffic congestion and delays. -19- o Street Maintenance Program - In fiscal year 2000-01, six positions were added to the Street Maintenance Program to catch up with providing street maintenance services citywide. Since that time, the city's streets (lanes) have increased by 224 miles or 25%. In December of 2007, two positions were eliminated due to budget reductions. With the most current reduction of three positions, five of the six staff added in fiscal year 2000-01 would be eliminated. Overall, street reconstruction will be reduced by 50%. Backlogs for litter and trash pickup will increase resulting in a negative appearance of the City. o Urban Forestry Program - Eliminating one position increases delays in clearing right-of- way obstructions and other tree related concerns. Some of these impacts include reductions in trimming, planting and root pruning of trees. Furthermore, the trimming of young trees will be eliminated. o Storm Drain Program - The five positions designated for elimination were approved in fiscal year 2007-08 to help the City comply with the new NPDES permit. The increased requirements with regard to NPDES were imposed by the State without providing the necessary funding. The new NPDES Permit requires inspection and cleaning of trash and debris from the City's storm drainage systems, including catch basins, storm drain inlets, open channels, culverts, detention basins, etc. Non-compliance could potentially result in notices of violation and fines. o NPDES Program - The eliminated Stormwater Compliance Inspector helped the City comply with the new NPDES permit. The Municipal Permit requires the City to implement various program components to minimize the discharge of pollutants from construction, residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal activities to the receiving waters of the State. o Park Maintenance Program - In fiscal year 2007-08, the Parks Division had 7 gardener positions eliminated due to budget reductions. The current budget cuts include eliminating 2 additional gardener positions, raising the total number of gardener positions cut to 9. This means that 9 of 10 gardeners added since fiscal year 2000-01 to maintain the new parks will have been cut. At the same time, the City has moved forward with the development of a new community park in San Miguel Ranch. Upon its completion, service levels at other parks will further degrade as we account for this increased workload. -20- o Traffic Division - This division traditionally covers about 47% of its work from various dedicated accounts. With the most current staffing, the service impacts include a reduction of speed surveys, accident investigations, and support for the traffic safety commission. In addition, there is no funding anticipated for traffic related public inquiries and council referrals including: traffic calming, signing and striping, parking, and sight distance. . Reduced Police Staffing - The Police Department has made every effort to minimize the service level impacts to the citizens of Chula Vista. Through the use of grant funds or moving officers into task force positions that receive funding from non-general fund sources, the department has been able to mitigate significant service impacts over the last couple offiscal years. While these funding sources will provide a temporary solution to the low staffing issues, long-term solutions need to be identified to prevent further erosion to staffing levels throughout one of the City's most core functions. In total 13.0 positions have been eliminated from the Police Department in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget, with an additional 4.0 positions being frozen. Although these frozen positions have not been eliminated from the department, the service impacts will remain since there will be four fewer officers in the field. The impact of the budget cuts result in moderate to significant reductions in many areas of service including: Direct Services, Investigative Services, Police Support Services, and Community Relations/Outreach. The Police Department is actively pursuing several grant funding opportunities through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act program from the Federal Government. Most of these grant funds are competitive in nature and there are no assurances that Chula Vista will receive the amount of money required to help reduce the service level impacts of the current proposed cuts, or those that were taken in previous years. o Direct Service - Direct service impacts include the elimination of the patrol Community Service Officer Program. This will delay response to priority calls, especially at the priority one and two response thresholds. With the elimination of the CSO program in Patrol, approximately 4,000 or more reports will be redirected to sworn officers which will divert them to low priority report calls thus delaying response times to other higher priority calls. By holding one of the K-9 positions vacant, the total elimination of the patrol K-9 program has been avoided at this time. The salary savings gained as a result of freezing one of the vacant K-9 positions will allow the Police Department to continue with a minimally staffed K- 9 presence, although there will be significant gaps in coverage which will still likely cause -21- increased response times and additional liability concerns. K-9's are instrumental in resolving many situations quickly and safely because of the training of the police dog. The elimination of the Commercial Enforcement Officer will impact the department's ability to ensure that the commercial vehicles/trucks that traverse the City are safe and abide by motor vehicle laws. Additionally, three peace officer positions in the Patrol Division will be frozen instead of eliminated. The effect of having three frozen positions will still impact response times. These reductions in actual sworn staff in the field will mean longer response times and potentially higher overtime usage to cover minimum staffing requirements should any increases in retirements or injuries occur in patrol. o Investigative Services -Investigative Services will be impacted significantly. Specialized detectives will be eliminated including the Computer Forensic Agent, Financial Crimes Agent, and Auto Theft Agent. The Computer Forensic Agent handled very technical investigations involving the use of computers. Often times, detectives find computers at a crime scene which may contain evidence and the Computer Forensic Agent was called in to secure any data on the disk, or to remove data from damaged or unreadable media. With the loss of this position, the City could incur substantial costs to send out to a third party computer forensic lab. Financial crimes are the fastest growing crime in the United States. Due to the nature of the investigations and the complexity of the cases, specialized training is required to work these cases. Auto theft represents 50% of the City's Part I crime totals. A trained auto theft detective is imperative to work the over 2,400 cases received each year. General detectives will now review any cases involving financial crimes or auto theft. Overall, staffing in the Investigative Services Division will be the same as it was back in the 1980's when the City's population was around 100,000 citizens. Most cases without any suspect information will unfortunately go uninvestigated unless any reliable leads are found. o Support - The fiscal year 2009-10 budget includes the elimination of several support positions that playa critical part in the day-to-day operations of the Police Department. The Community Service Officer in the Family Protection Unit registers and tracks sex offenders in Chula Vista. There.are over 300 documented sex offenders in Chula Vista and this position tracks their location and liaisons with various law enforcement and court related agencies to ensure these offenders are registered and their location in our city is known. This function will now be handled by a detective, which will reduce the amount of time that detective can spend dealing with sex crimes, domestic/elder abuse and other family crimes. -22- There are also two juvenile programs that are contracted through South Bay Community Services that help identify troubled youth and put them back on track to be contributing members of the community. With an over 98% success rate (based upon recidivism rates), these programs are essential in reducing crimes involving youth. The Police Training Manager was originally included in the budget reduction plan but the elimination of this position jeopardizes the departments' ability to maintain the high levels of training that significantly reduce liability and improve officer skill levels. The department will utilize one-time grant funds to retain this position, although these grant funds will only be able to maintain this position for FY 2010. This position has been eliminated from the General Fund and added to the Police Grants Fund. The additional elimination of the Police Agent in the Backgrounds unit will result in slower recruitment times for new officers, which could result in understaffing conditions in the Patrol unit. This becomes critical as the officer per thousand ratio for the department continues to drop to almost one officer per thousand residents (the lowest in San Diego County). It is anticipated that the department will see increased response times much as it did back in 2005 when there were significant gaps between the authorized number of sworn officers and the actual number of sworn officers in the field. Finally, a Latent Print Examiner position has also been eliminated which will cause significant delays in the processing of fingerprints from crime scenes. This potentially could cause suspects to go free or significantly delay prosecution because of the long delay in the examination of fingerprint evidence. o Community Relations - The entire Community Relations Unit, including the supervisor (from previous cuts in FY2008, Sergeant), Peace Officer and two civilian positions have been eliminated from the General Fund. The Community Relations Unit is the vital link between the Police Department and the community. This will significantly impact the department's ability to respond to community concerns in a timely manner. Programs such . as Neighborhood Watch, Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, Crime Free Multi-family Housing Certification, and attendance at neighborhood/civic meetings will be eliminated. Additionally, responses to inquiries regarding police services will be significantly delayed as well as a reduction of timely information available to the news media. The use of the Community Meeting Room will be restricted to normal operating hours as there will be -23- no staff available for after hours meetings. The Department is reinstating the PIO and one Police Community Relations Specialist in the Police Grant Fund through new grant funding from the Federal Government as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act program. This funding will only carry these positions for two years, and then the department will need to find additionally funding or eliminate the program entirely. Despite being able to save these two positions, service to the community will be greatly reduced. . Cross Staffing of Urban Search and Rescue - This budget reduction designates the four positions per day that staff the urban search and rescue vehicle (USAR 53) at Fire Station Three as supplemental staffing by eliminating USAR 53 from continuous service and placing it at Station Seven to be "cross staffed" with personnel from Truck 57. These four positions will be used to backfill daily vacancies that occur at other fire stations within the department. This will result in savings from not having to pay overtime to backfill for vacancies due to leave. The elimination of USAR 53 from continuous service results in decreased specialized rescue capabilities and coverage. The Station Seven district will not have an apparatus with fire attack capabilities and therefore initiating an attack on fires will be delayed. Residents may be affected with potential increased response times, because an extra unit will be required on structure fires. Residents of the eastern territories will be impacted to a larger extent because the proposed staffing decrease will affect Station Seven that is located in the eastern section of the city. Response times may also increase, as second and third calls for service will take longer to respond to due to one less unit being available for coverage. . Reduced Development Services - As part of the reorganizations put in place during fiscal year 2008-09, the Planning and Building Department, Redevelopment Agency, Housing Authority, Economic Development and the Development Services Fund were all put under the direction of the Deputy City Manager/Development Services. The staffing reductions for this group include the elimination of 6.5 positions from the Development Services Fund, 5 0 positions from the Redevelopment Agency, and 2.0 positions from Planning & Building. Reductions in this section include the following: o Redevelopment Agency - The State of California, (n fiscal years 2004-2005, 2005-2006 and 2008-2009 required the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency to shift tax increment revenues to the State Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF). For fiscal year 2004-2005 and fiscal year 2005-2006, the Agency borrowed funds from the California Statewide Communities Development Authority to make its ERAF payments. Financing the -24- fiscal years 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 ERAF shifts was necessary to maintain funding for ongoing redevelopment projects. To make its fiscal year 2008-2009 ERAF payment, the Agency eliminated existing vacancies as well as delayed redevelopment and capital improvement projects. The elimination of five positions from the Redevelopment Agency makes a structural change that allows the Agency to handle additional ERAF shifts or increase the loan repayment to the General Fund. o Development Services Fund - The elimination of 6.5 positions from the Development Services Fund negatively impacts the department's level of effort in - timely research and retrieval of building records and response to Public Records Act requests, meeting established performance goals for project reviews and next day inspections, providing expeditious resolution to conflicts arising in the building plan check and inspection process, and providing policy and code recommendations to City Council on building construction matters (e.g. Green Building standards, accessibility). o Advanced Planning - Two positions were eliminated from the Advanced Planning division. The loss of these positions negatively impacts the department's level of effort in seeking financial resources for implementation of Otay Valley Regional Park, adoption and implementation of the Historic Preservation program, timely review of development projects for General Plan consistency and for sites with historic resources, timely processing of applications for historic designations, and loss of clerical support for Advance Planning and GMOC. o Code Enforcement - The budget reduction plan includes the transfer of one Code Enforcement Officer from the Sign Enforcement Program to the Residential Abandoned Property Program resulting in the elimination of the Sign Eriforcement Program. o Reduced Economic Development funding - As part of the budget-balancing plan, the City eliminated support to outside economic development organizations at the local, regional and state level; including the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, San Diego Connect, and Team California. The fiscal year 2009-10 budget also reflects a . -- reduction in funding for the South County Economic Development Council. Eliminating the support to these non-profits reduces or eliminates each organization's ability and incentive to promote Chula Vista, represent the City's interests and refer business development leads to the City. -25- . Reduced Administration staffing - As part of the cost cutting efforts put in place during fiscal year 2008-09 the Administration department was reorganized. The Office of Budget and Analysis and Economic Development were transferred to the Finance and Planning and Building departments respectively. The Administration department was further reorganized to combine Communications into the City Manager's Office. The reorganization of the Administration Department resulted in the elimination of two executive management positions. Excluding the transfers, 9.0 positions have been eliminated from Administration; these reductions included the following: o City Manager's Office - The elimination of two management positions in the City Manager's Office resulted in the elimination of the City's legislative analysis and governmental relations program and shifted the duties related to coordinating the agenda process to the City Clerk's Office. One administrative support position was also eliminated from the City Manager's Office. o Office of Communications - As mentioned above, the Office of Communications has been merged with the City Manager's Office. This transition allowed for the elimination of one executive management position. The Graphic Designer was also eliminated from Communications. The reduction in staffing severely limits the City's public information and media relations efforts, eliminates its photography, video production and virtual tour capability. The CV Connect will be discontinued from publication and the City's website will be updated less frequently. . Reduced Information Technology Services - Reduced funding for the Information Technology Department results in the elimination of 5.0 positions and reduces the funding available for computer replacement. o Reduced ITS staffing - The elimination of two microcomputer/network support professionals increases the resolution times for non-critical support issues from 1-2 days to 2-3 days on average. These positions also handled all of the network-related calls for service from the users and responded to support calls for Police dispatch, Fire related calls and for the Library. The elimination of one of four application support positions results in programming delays - mostly in the area of Permits Plus, Business License processing, and custom applications for the Police Department. One of two Webmaster positions was also eliminated; the elimination of this position delays the rollout of additional e-government applications. The ITS department also lost its clerical support position. -26- o Reduced Computer Replacement Funding - The annual computer replacement fund has been reduced or eliminated for the past several years. The City has computers that are as slow as 1 GHZ single core processors and more than 6 years old still in use. These computers will not be replaced unless they completely fail to operate or are so slow that they become unusable. . Reduced Human Resources Services - The elimination of 4.5 positions in the Human Resources department impacts the Operations, Risk Management, and Benefits divisions. o Operations - Staff in this division has absorbed the workload of four positions cut through previous budget reduction processes. The further reduction in staffing results in delays in the delivery of services such as the recruitment and testing of safety and civilian positions and delays in providing benefit and payroll support to the remaining workforce. Over the past eight years the City has spent a significant amount of time and resources to align the classification and compensation structure - the citywide reorganization and reassignment of duties as a result of the budget and program reductions will require the city to spend the same amount of time and effort to ensure the new city structure meets FLSA guidelines and is fair and equitable in order to avoid a wide array of employment liability issues. o Risk Management - The loss of a Senior Risk Management Specialist (Safety) results in city and community wide impacts as it limits the City's ability to address safety issues on a proactive preventative basis. The loss of a Senior Risk Management Specialist (Loss Control) limits the City's ability to pursue financial restitution from parties who have damaged city property or who have tied up police and fire resources as a result of alcohol related accidents. Collection efforts will be limited to insured parties only. o Employee Benefits -The staffing reductions in this division result in delays in processing bi- weekly payroll transactions, including benefits and MOU related matters; it also limits the City's ability to identify and implement benefit options that could result in cost savings. . Reduced Finance Services - Staffing reductions in the FinanceDepartment have resulted in an overall 33% decrease in staffing in this department. Previous reductions have impacted the Administrative, Operations and Treasury divisions; further staffing reductions in these areas would inhibit the City's ability to meet annual reporting deadlines and continue to be in compliance with Federal, State, and Local financial reporting deadlines. The current reduction of 3.0 positions -27- impacts the Purchasing division and Accounts Payable. o Purchasing - The elimination of the Purchasing Agent and Procurement Specialist increases the time to review and approve contracts, issue formal bids, process requisitions, and process payments to vendors. o Accounts Payable - A vacant Accounting Assistant position has also been eliminated from the Operations division, which required the reallocation of workload to existing staff. This shift in workload results in delays in processing vendor payments in a timely manner. o Budget and Analysis - During fiscal year 2008-09 the Office of Budget & Analysis was consolidated with the Finance Department, resulting in the elimination of the Director of Budget and Analysis, an executive management position. Other staffing reductions in this division included the elimination of the Special Projects Manager position (formerly Grants Manager position), which negatively impacts the number of grant proposals written and received as well as the City's ability to pursue potential new sources of revenues including impact fees and user fees. The elimination of a budget analyst position negatively impacts the quality of budget services provided to departments, the City Manager, the City Council and Citizens. . Reduced City Clerk staffing - Past budget reductions have resulted in delays in meeting state mandates, such as campaign statement review, fulfillment of requests for records and information; and in preparing City Council minutes. The elimination of the Assistant City Clerk will cause continued delays in providing these services. . Reduced City Attorney staffing - The elimination of two positions eliminates specialized legal expertise in certain areas induding redevelopment, employment, ADA, conflicts and labor law. The elimination of attorney and support staff positions will result in extended legal project completion time and will eliminate the department's ability to perform non-essential projects. The downgrading of two positions reduces the experience and expertise level of attorneys providing advice and support. Potential increase in the use of outside counsel may be required for projects requiring specialized legal knowledge or projects constrained by time sensitive requirements. -28- SUMMARY OF STAFFING CHANGES The proposed fiscal year 2009-10 budget includes 1,005 positions for all funds. This is a net decrease of 104.5 from the fiscal year 2008-09 Council adopted budget authorized position count of 1,109.5. The section that follows is divided into two sections - the staffing changes that have already been approved by Council during fiscal year 2008-09 and changes being implemented as part of the fiscal year 2009-10 budget. POSITION CHANGES AUTHORIZED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 On September 9, 2008 Council approved the implementation of a budget reduction plan for the Development Services Fund (DSF), which resulted in the elimination of 85 positions and the transfer of 2.0 positions from the DSF to the General Fund. During fiscal year 2008-09, Council also approved the addition of a grant funded position to the Police Department. The final position added mid-year was the reinstatement of an Information Technology Support Specialist, as authorized by Council. The table on the following pages summarizes the position changes Council authorized during fiscal year 2008-09, including the positions eliminated as part of the budget reduction plan approved on September 9, 2008. Information Technology Services (1.0) Planning & Building (2.0) Police (1.0) Microcomputer Support Information Technology Support Specialist 100 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officer 2.00 Traffic Operations Police Agent 100 -29- Development Services Fund-Planning & Building (-10.5) Planning Administration Community Planning Plan Review Building Field Inspection PSB Front Counter Reclassification - Community Planning Reclassification - Development Planning Reclassification - Plan Review Assistant Director of Planning Associate Planner Plans Examiner Building Inspector II Development Services Counter Manager Development Services Technician II Development Services Technician III Principal Planner Senior Planner Senior Planner Associate Planner Senior Plans Examiner Plans Examiner -100 -2.00 -1.00 -2.00 -100 -2.50 -100 -1.00 1.00 -1.00 100 -100 1.00 PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 CHANGES In developing the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget, the City went through a budget reduction process in order to address projected budgetary gaps resulting from a continued slowdown in the economy and a deteriorating housing market. Council reviewed the proposed budget reductions in a series of workshops in December 2008 and January 2009, and as a result 100.5 positions are proposed for elimination. In addition, the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget reflects a number of reorganizations in order to reduce costs and/or to improve operational efficiency. Lastly, the proposed fiscal year 2009-10 budget includes a number of reclassifications and staffing enhancements requested in conjunction with the normal budget development process. In total, these department requested staffing modifications result in a net increase of 2.5 FTE. Budqet Reductions As mentioned above, in developing the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget additional reductions were needed in the General Fund, Redevelopment Agency, and the Development Services Fund in order to bring expenditures in line with revenues. A total of 100.50 positions are being eliminated from the budget. The table below summarizes the staffing changes reflected in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget. Mayor & Council (-1.0) Mayor & Council Reclassification Coastal Environmental Policy Consultant Chief of Staff Senior Council Assistant 11;_.. City Clerk's Office (-1.0) Operations Assistant City Clerk -1.00 -30- Administration Executive Assistant -1.00 Litigation Deputy City Attorney III -100 City Attorney's Office Reclassification - Deputy City Attorney III -100 (-2.0) Administration Deputy City Attorney II 1.00 Reclassification - Senior Assistant City Attorney -100 Administration Assistant City Attorney 1.00 Executive Assistant to the City Manager -1.00 City Manager's Office Government Relations Liaison -1.00 Administrative Secretary -1.00 Office of Communications Graphic Designer -100 Administration Director of Communications -100 (-9.0) Reclassification - Office of Special Events Planner -1.00 Communications Communications Coordinator 100 Director of Budget & Analysis -100 Office of Budget & Analysis Principal Management Analyst -1.00 Senior Management Analyst -1.00 Special Projects Manager -1.00 Administration Administrative Secretary -100 Information Information Technology Support Specialist -2.00 Technology Services Technology Support & (-50) Administration Webmaster -1.00 Senior Application Support Specialist -100 Human Resources Assistant Director of Human Resources -1.00 Operations Fiscal Office Specialist -0.50 Human Resources Reclassification - Human Principal HR Analyst -1.00 (-4.5) Resources Operations Senior H R Analyst 1.00 Loss Control Senior Risk Management Specialist -100 Benefits Administration Benefits Technician -1.00 Safety Senior Risk Management Specialist -1.00 Finance Purchasing Procurement Specialist -100 (-3.0) Purchasing Agent -100 Operations Accounting Assistant -1.00 Planning & Building Advance Planning Senior Planner -1.00 (-2.0) Secretary -100 Finance & Administration Director of Engineering/City Engineer -1.00 Engineering Senior Office Specialist -1.00 (-2.5) Building & Park Construction Landscape Planner 1/11 1.00 Landscape Architect -0.50 Real Property Senior Civil Engineer -100 Community Patrol Community Service Officer -3.00 Police Agent -1.00 Tr8ffic Operations Peace Officer -1.00 Police(-13.0) Office Specialist -100 Street Team/Gang Peace Officer -1.00 Suppression Community Relations Police Community Relations Specialist -100 Peace Officer -1.00 -31- Property Crimes Community Service Officer -1.00 Police Agent -2.00 Police Professional Standards Police Agent -1.00 (cont) Forensic Services Latent Print Examiner -1.00 Resource Management Principal Management Analyst 100 Administration Parks & Open Space Manager -1.00 Infrastructure Maintenance Public Works Manager -1.00 Admin Signing & Striping Maintenance Worker I1II -1.00 Equipment Operator -1.00 Street Maintenance Maintenance Worker 1111 -1.00 Senior Maintenance Worker -1.00 Urban Forestry Tree Trimmer -1.00 Public Works Storm Drain Maintenance Maintenance Worker 1111 -3.00 (-22.0) Senior Maintenance Worker -2.00 Electrician -100 Building Maintenance HVAC Technician -1.00 Painter -2.00 Senior Electrician -1.00 Custodian Services Custodian -100 Traffic Devices Traffic Devices Technician -1.00 Parks Maintenance Gardener 1111 -2.00 Stormwater Compliance Stormwater Compliance Inspector 1111 -1.00 Administration Assistant Director of Recreation -1.00 Senior Recreation Manager -1.00 Therapeutics Recreation Supervisor II -1.00 Middle School Program Recreation Supervisor II -1.00 Administrative Secretary -100 Recreation Aquarist -0.75 (-135) NC Grounds Maintenance Worker -1.00 Nature Center NC Maintenance Specialist -1.00 Registered Veterinary Technician -0.75 Senior Office Specialist -100 Nature Center Programs Manager -300 Parkway Recreation Center Recreation Supervisor III -100 Administration Assistant Library Director -1.00 Collection Development Delivery Driver -0.50 Literacy Literacy & Programming Coordinator -100 Reclassification - Civic Librarian II -100 Center Branch Operations Librarian III 1.00 Library(-10.5) South Chula Vista Branch Senior Office SpeCialist -1.00 Operations Principal Librarian -100 Library Programs Senior Librarian -1.00 Educational Services Supervisor -300 STRETCH and DASH Senior Educational Services Supervisor -1.00 Senior Office Specialist -1.00 -32- Development Services Fund-Planning & Building (-3.5) Development Services Fund-Engineering -2.0 Development Services Fund-Public Works (-1.0) Redevelopment (-5.0) Community Planning . Building Administration PSB Front Counter Building Field Inspection Subdivisions landscape Architecture Reclassification - Construction Inspection landscape Inspection Redevelopment Senior Planner Assistant Director of Building & Housing Office Specialist Building Inspector II Senior Civil Engineer landscape Planner 1/11 Senior Public Works Inspector Public Works Inspector Senior landscape Inspector Senior Secretary Project Coordinator 1/11 Director of Redevelopment & Housing Principal Project Coordinator Total Proposed Staffing Changes -1.00 -1.00 -0.50 -1.00 -1.00 -1.00 -100 100 -100 -1.00 -2.00 -1.00 -100 -100.50 Reorqanizations Development and Maintenance Services - The fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget also reflects a reorganization of the City's development and maintenance service departments, including Engineering, General Services/Animal Care Facility, Planning & Building, the Development Services fund, and Redevelopment. The proposed reorganization includes the transfer of several large workgroups, including: . Transfer of the Animal Care Facility from the Public Works department to the newly retitled General Services/Animal Care Facility department (20.25 FTE) . Transfer of the Public Works Construction Inspection function from the Development Services fund to the General fund (10.00 FTE) . Transfer of the Planning & Building Administration function from the Development Services fund to the General fund (5.00 FTE) . Consolidation of the remaining Development Services fund (Planning & Building and Engineering) under a newly created Deputy City Manager/Director of Development Services (10.00 FTE) . Consolidation of the Engineering department with the Public Works department (31.00 FTE) C' n: to' Engineering (-32.0) Administrative Analyst 1/11 Assistant Director of Engineering Assistant Surveyor 1/11 Associate Engineer Building Project Manager Engineering Technician 1/11 land Surveyor -33- .\$ III-t.,; Development Services Fund (1.0) Public Works ( -20.25) General Services/ Animal Care Facility (20.25) Development Services Fund-Planning & Building (-5.0) General Fund-Planning & Building (5.0) Development Services Fund-Public Works (-100) General Fund-Public Works (100) Redevelopment (-10) General Fund-Planning & Building (1 0) Principal Civil Engineer Principal Management Analyst Real Property Manager Secretary Senior Administrative Secretary Senior Civil Engineer Senior Engineering Technician Signal Systems Engineer 1111 Survey Technician 1111 Landscape Planner 1/11 Animal Adoption Counselor Animal Care Assistant Animal Control Manager Animal Control Officer Animal Control Officer Supervisor Office Specialist Registered Veterinary Technician Senior Animal Care Assistant Senior Office Specialist Administrative Technician Development Automation Specialist Director of Planning & Building Senior Administrative Secretary Senior Secretary Public Works Inspector 1111 Senior Civil Engineer Senior Public Works Inspector , Senior Secretary 2.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 400 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 6.50 1.00 4.00 100 350 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Senior Project Coordinator 1.00 Net Proposed Staffing Change 0.00 The following title changes are recommended in order to reflect the new organization of the development and maintenance services departments. ".U :_ ~ ; General Services/Animal Care Facility Planning & Building Animal Control Manager Director of Planning & Building Animal Care Facility Manager 100 Deputy City ManagerlDir of Dev Services 1.00 Administration - The fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget also reflects a reorganization of the Administration Department, including the transfer of the Economic Development program to -34- Planning & Building and the transfer of the Office of Budget & Analysis to the Finance department. The proposed reorganization of the City's administration function is summarized below. Administration (-7.0) Finance (4.0) Planning & Building (2.0) Recreation (1.0) Assistant Director of Budget & Analysis 1.00 Fiscal & Management Analyst 3.00 Economic Development Officer 1.00 Principal Economic Development Specialist 1.00 Fiscal & Management Analyst 1.00 Net Proposed Staffing Change 0.00 The following title changes are recommended in order to reflect the reorganization of the administration function. Finance Budget & Analysis Manager 100 Fiscal Year 2009-10 Proposed Staffinq Chanqes In conjunction with the normal budget development process, a number of staffing modifications were requested, with a net impact of 2.5 additional FTE. The proposed staffing changes include: . Enhanced Animal Care Facility staffing (2.0 FTE) . Addition of a revenue offset Associate Engineer to the Public Works Department (1.0 FTE) . Transfer of a Public Safety Analyst from the General fund to the Police Grants fund (0.5 FTE) . Addition of a Deputy Fire Chief (1.0 FTE) . Addition of a revenue offset Recycling Specialist 1111 to the Environmental Services fund (1.0 FTE) . Elimination of a Parking Meter Technician from the Parking Meter fund (0.5 FTE) . Reclassifications in the Public Works, Police, Fire, and Library departments. The table below summarizes the proposed changes reflected in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget. General Services/ Animal Care Facility (2) Animal Care Facility Animal Adoption Counselor Registered Veterinary Technician Veterinary Assistant Animal Care Assistant 050 1.00 1.00 -0.50 -35- Ii:... Survey Associate Engineer 1.00 Public Works Reclassification - Open Open Space Inspector -1.00 (1) Space Senior Landscape Inspector 1.00 Resou rce Management Public Safety Analyst -050 Reclassification - Traffic Police Agent -100 Police Operations Peace Officer 1.00 (-0.5) Reclassification - Public Safety Analyst -1.00 Professional Standards Civilian Background Investigator 1.00 Administration Deputy Fire Chief 1.00 Reclassification - Fire Marshall -100 Administration Deputy Fire Chief 1.00 Fire Reclassification - Assistant Fire Chief -1.00 (1) Administration Deputy Fire Chief 1.00 Reclassification - Training Fire Battalion Chief -1.00 Division Chief 1.00 Library Reclassification - Director of Library -1.00 (0) Administration Deputy City Managerl Director of Library 100 Development Services Subdivisions Associate Engineer 1.00 Fund (0) Transportation Planning Associate Engineer -1.00 Fleet Reclassification - Fleet Equipment Maintenance Manager -1.00 (0) Operations Fleet Manager 100 Police Grants CBAG CBAG Budget Manager -1.00 (-1.5) CBAG Lead Programmer Analyst -100 Police Grants Public Safety Analyst 0.50 Environmental Svcs Environmental Services Recycling Specialist IIII 1.00 (1) Parking Fund Parking Parking Meter Technician -0.50 (-0.5) Net Proposed Staffing Change 2.50 -36- 5-Year Position Summary ~" "~''''1~111v~'m\'''''(',~., ,..,.,.,.",'",.,,,~,,.. ""''''''''''''''''''''''''''''J.lf'~"'''!1W-'''1'''7'''l!"''''''''''''''''1"I'''jPl''''_!Fl'''''''''rn::''''"""rl~-'lI ~ """"="'~~"''' ",' ~"m",'ml='-"~i'~ .~:':;.'c~"" .Mt'J~\)'"<'$'-''"''''''''''' '<.. , ~JI~!<" ~ "Ii . "-i"f. :;g'1'" "i\I"S;:;(~L'!M".;;tH""""~i~~"'1ii~W.1;':::~"',:)\))W'f(ii)(/'<~(,;iH"""<'?'t;;'""'m:mt.,;W\(U!,,,,;,(,)");;)"'~'i*\!\(q,\!.''''(';;\'' ~'"'iil^ :' "''';4',' ';;>'k";';'\;s"~"'(i j I ;'Yj*'&";"'I",'li~'r.hN:Air~. ~;.;i1*;;'" '~!iiJ$lAY!litrr;;fF!,.;,,1r"j""'I.,:I'N111 ,; f~~8 .. ',~,"," " ..j;i;:.wW)j]~,; '~l:;;~1j.8l2~b"'m4~2uitd~MDj~~J!':;W~~j€:rili:mm:b[;m;~:E:Lil~~till~~1L~1l;~lJ ;0:: '. .;"';"~ia~~""- 'f~~~~'4i.fSM":,i~hf lJ1~lri~l<l~wHlUt.;rmHtr'"~ra,,L "lliii:1 ~)~~.:)nnM.Y~:iiJ,f.t.:Itj~~ City Council ' City Clerk/Elections City Attorney Administration Information Technology Services Human Resources Finance TOTAL ~U~JW~ General Services/Animal Care Facility Community Development Planning & Building Engineering Public Works 14,00 8,50 14,00 20,00 29,00 25,50 28,00 139.00 15,00 8,50 14,00 21,00 29,00 25,50 31,00 144.00 14,00 8,50 14,00 19,00 28,00 25,00 31,Q0 139.50 14,00 7.50 12,00 26,00 23,00 20,50 25,00 128.00 13,00 6,50 10,00 1Q,00 19,00 16,00 26,00 100.50 ~ ";" TOTAL ~t~:I/;~'Jt~~~~'];Vli!~tfl'1A,(1r,d~';iJJ1m Police Fire 10523 25,00 91,00 51,00 186,00 458.23 104,75 25,00 90,50 51,00 186,50 457.75 102,25 13,00 80,50 41,Q0 150,50 387,25 20,00 34,50 194,15 249.25 22,25 28,00 19450 244.75 TOTAL ~ijli!;jt~~~~."'tt~~Jtl1~1!W]il!!~'1i1AlI Recreation Library Nature Center 360,50 141,00 501.50 381,50 151,00 532.50 366,50 153,00 519.50 337,50 135,00 472.50 322,00 136,00 458.00 TOTAL ,~ENERAt j:UNDjSUSTOTAL, ',j' ,,,,' , " ~,;;~r';;;Ji,,~f,1i~r.l.~1,iA:lj)~*ift,~!i)t~~~i~'~ Development Services Parking Meter Police Grant Funds/California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) Environmental Services Redevelopment & Housing Transit Sewer Fle.et Management '" GENERAL FUND SU13:TOTAL 34,00 70,75 9,25 114.00 '':'3 ;l):::1;#~J. 7$' 34,00 70,75 9,25 114.00 ,,1,248:25 34,00 66,25 9,50 109.75 :'1;156:00 38,50 50,75 89.25 :"(939.00 26,00 40,25 66.25 869:50 39,00 ~',',,',,',f';f,'<h . .......",,,,,,,, GRAND TOTAL (does not include hourly staffing) 0,50 14,00 "11'.14;50" ,.,.,........ ." 1 ,227.23 0,50 1,00 14,00 15.50" , ... 1,263.75 0,50 21,00 11,00 3,00 43,00 14,00 92:5q 1,248.50 70,00 0,50 21,00 3,00 17,00 3,00 46,00 1Q,00 170;:50 1,109,50 '<b, 22,50 4,00 11,00 3,00 46,00 10,00 , ,{3~,5q 1,005.00 -38- p R T o o s p E D B u D G E GIENERAl FUND SUMMARY General Fund Revenue Summary General Fund Expenditure Summary Department Summary Reports -39- ~%!!, ;>.' ;';i~~';::::~~:(?r t'\ I" '''1' ~., "<'~ t, ," ~i:;;tf;r~; . ",:;i)!'{!::~)::':':[~~' ~'''!' '-"<"'1'" I' ,,>"..'l, ""'11< '''', ' ';~:':'"/~1t ~\~~ 1!1;"il;""l'h,~@,r'\l<"I", , ,~1!:;~ :~:::';:>1;~::~~:~,!;t;:;;;',,:: " ~',", , 'j :~'::Ji~1 " . -.',' ,,"'I"T"'-""'''''I'''''' "I ,,~i!j,;l:;:i,!' ~:~~: : J i~~\!';~ >::'~,~'~;~;j,:,:;~~;;::,~;,' I'. "j, , ,,- , I ' "."n", < III < <.,"~ I" ,,!i:m;'::;,:I:;:'I:!):'~':;,'r:;i,::::}"::I;:;::"~t I'l<"""!."'" "f"^'!'I"'~J"h"'l<'" 1!:ii",:;:I,:i:::i4.;:'~~,::!::':;!;':;:'i:::!' l'<""'lll",<!,'l'l"~"""l" :1';;~;f;,~;i:;:(:~~~fujiJii .;;~:;: .\:~~ . :,:"'1""" 'Jr:---:'''J;:~;ll'j':'11: ',,:' 1" 'I. ,~o, ',~"" -"", ,,"'I, , 1~~\;:i:::~', '/,;:,ir.J:,;, i ;' i" ,:~ .:~" ::(1' A~!:;;; , r"'" "'-I-,~l' , , ,,' , ,,'.. ',','""", r'ti:i;:;::,:;::f"'~;, , ,iI' ;':,':;":::''''::;'';i 1.""""",',4~""!",,,,!,,1" );;!;{:;'~!lii1:~:I:i~;~l:J::~;1::":l::~1~i;~k, t :' ",,,' 'll'I"'I;""jll"""~I\""k"~ ;; :'~:::,,::l~:. ,;,}'~:\~::,/;i::;:,ii' :!' :':':;l:!:: >, :;~.~' ::-'-:, : )1:;, '!i">:~~:: :Ji!':;::,:::i,::!i:',~):::::;,:;,:!: .,,'::::,:;,':, ,'::: . ~l:r-:!ll; ,:' ,,:l~ )1~:i~i;i!!:/;!:~2:.~~::,'::}?j;i:~; fi""",n)",,,, 1~!~1i,,1::,i;::i';:~';~::~::::!:,;:,:J':':i(, r'J"L""!w...""~9">" ~f:;":;::/i,,;i,~t~::;:,:,::,!i.:: ,,,,,,'II'I,/~'<,,,,,,,,,,, ., :~::'^1~~:::::J9 ).,;l;:~:l~; ~::;:l: , " "'~ GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY The fiscal year 2009-10 estimated revenues total $132.8 million and are projected to support the operating budget with no impact on reserves. General Fund revenues are projected to decrease from fiscal year 2008-09 projected levels by $7.0 million or -5%. The revenue reductions reflect the continued impacts due to the prolonged national and local recession, which is expected to begin a slow recovery by the end of calendar year 2009. The local economy has seen a serious economic downturn, affecting the majority of General Fund discretionary revenues. Mitigation strategies continue to be implemented in the 2009-10 fiscal year in order to offset declining revenues. The General Fund Summary table on the following page reflects the serious decline in revenues that the City has experienced. r--tHULA VISTA GENERALFU'~6 ~~~-~-~-U~$'l' i in thousands (000) I , ,I.- , , , i FY 07-08 Actual ,153,938 FY 08-09 Projected 139,915 FY, 09,10 Proposed 132;844 %' 08-09 to FY 09-10 -5.1% The largest revenue increases between fiscal years 2008-09 and 2009-10 are projected as follows: . Increased Transfers From Other Funds revenue from $11,1 million to $12.2 million ($1.1 million or 10.5%), this reflects a $2.4 million increase in the transfer from the Redevelopment Agency due to a loan repayment to the General Fund. This increase is offset by reduced revenues from the Gas Tax Fund due to decreased consumer spending on fuel (-$0.4 million), the Development Services Fund due 'to a reduction in staffing' and citywide overhead (-$0.6 million), and miscellaneous reductions in other funds (-$0.4 million) . Increased Development revenue from $1.0 million to $1.9 million ($0 9 million). This increase largely reflects the transfer of the Construction Inspection group to the General Fund from the Development Services Fund. -41. . Increased Utilitv Users Taxes revenue from $7.4 million to $8.2 million ($0.7 million or 10.1 %). These increases are a result of contractual negotiations by staff and subject to contract terms. UUT revenues would be a secure source of ongoing funding for City services if the City modernized its ordinance, as recommended by the City's tax consultant and recently approved by the citizens of more than 45 jurisdictions throughout California. . Increased Inter-fund Reimbursements revenue from $9.3 million to $97 million ($0.4 million or 4.7%). Changes in this category include an increase in CIP revenue ($2.2 million) resulting from economic stimulus funding, and an increase in Open Space reimbursements ($0.2 million). These revenue increases are offset by decreases in reimbursements from other agencies (-$1.0 million), elimination of CIP reimbursements from Development Impact Fee Funds and Community Development Block Grants (-$0.6 million), and a decrease in Redevelopment Agency reimbursements (-$0.4 million). Offsetting these estimated revenue increases are the following projected decreases: . A $2.3 million reduction in Use of Money and Property revenues in the General Fund. Due to the City's reduced cash balances there are no projected investment earnings that are being budgeted. . A $2.0 million reduction in Property Tax revenues as a result of significant decreases in assessed property values countywide. Resale home prices have dropped considerably over the last year resulting in a reduction in supplemental property tax revenue. . A $2.0 million reduction in Other Agency revenues due to the elimination of the STRETCH and DASH programs (-$1.7 million) and a reduction in state and federal grant revenues (-$0.3 million). Beginning in fiscal year 2009-10, the Chula Vista Elementary School District will be partnering with the YMCA to run the STRETCH and DASH programs at local elementary schools. . A $1.5 million reduction in Motor Vehicle Licenses revenue. After fiscal year 2005-06, the property tax in-lieu portion of the VLF revenues received by municipalities are increased by the jurisdiction's.annual growth in assessed valuation. The City's decrease in assessed values. for fiscal year 2009-10 is reflected in the projected decrease in VLF revenues. . A $1.3 million reduction in Sales Tax revenues due to the current recession and reduced consumer spending. -42- The following table and charts provide a summary view of the major General Fund revenue sources. General Fund Revenues (Projected vs. Proposed) In Thousands (000) Property Taxes $ 29,307 $ 29,232 $ 27,199 -7.0% Sales Tax $ 28,305 $ 26,890 $ 25,546 -50% Motor Vehicle Licenses $ 19,797 $ 19,816 $ 18,287 -7.7% Transfers from Other Funds $ 9,736 $ 11,058 $ 12,220 10.5% Franchise Fees $ 9,663 $ 10,033 $ 10,033 00% Interfund Reimbursements $ 12,542 $ 9,288 $ 9,727 4.7% Utility Users Taxes $ 7,378 $ 7,422 $ 8,169 101% Charges for Services $ 6,845 $ 5,834 $ 5,897 1.1% Transient Occupancy Taxes $ 2,697 $ 2,570 $ 2,603 1.3% Fines, Forfeitures & Penalties $ 1,520 $ 2,231 $ 2,380 66% Other Local Taxes $ 2,033 $ 2,031 $ 2,031 0.0% Development Revenue 1 $ 9,453 $ 995 $ 1,876 88.6% Use of Money & Property $ 2,907 $ 4,059 $ 1,780 -56.1% Other Revenues $ 4,647 $ 2,870 $ 1,709 -405% Police Grants $ 2,014 $ 1,724 $ 1,514 -12.1% Other Agency Revenue $ 4,224 $ 3,201 $ 1,221 -619% Licenses & Permits $ 870 $ 660 $ 653 -1.2% Total General Fund Revenues $ 153,938 $ 139,915 $ 132,844 -5.1% 1 Beginning with fiscal year 2008 09, the major development related revenues (i.e. building permits, zoning fees, plan checking fees, plumbing permits, electrical permits, and utility permits) were moved out of the General Fund to a Development Services Fund (Fund 236) to provide better transparency and to try and insulate the General Fund from the business cycles of the construction industry. The fiscal year2009-1 0 reflects the transfer of the Public Works division from the Development Services Fund to the General Fund. -43- General Fund Revenues by Category Fiscal Year 2009-10 Motor Vehicle Licenses 14% Development Rev. 1% Interfund Reimb. 7% Sales Tax 19% Transfers In 9% Franchise Fees 8% Utility Users Taxes 6% Property Taxes 21% Other Revenue 7% \ , \_ Other Local Taxes 2% ..-----._____ Charges for Services 4% Historical and Estimated General Fund Revenue Sources Fiscal Years 2003-04 through 2009-10 80 180 160 140 120 100 60 40 20 FY 04 Actual gSales Tax fJIn terfund Reimb. TOT mLicenses & Permits BOthe r Ag ency Re \.e nue FY 05 Actual FY06Actual FY 07 Actua I FY 08 Actu al FY 09 Estimated FY 10 Budget E'iDevelopment Rev ISIUtility Users Taxes !J:Oth er Revenu e fmPolice Grants .t:01Property Taxes Transfers In ElCharges for Services CFines Forfeitures & Penalties BMotor Vehicle Licenses t:JFranchlse Fees Othe r La cal Taxes IlDUre of Money & Property -44- DIVERSIFIED REVENUE BASE One of the City's strengths has been its diversified revenue base. A diversified revenue base lessens the impact fluctuations in specific economic sectors have on the City's ability to provide services. Although we maintain a diversified revenue base, it will be imperative to the continued fiscal sustainability of the City to focus on increasing its discretionary revenue base. PROPERTY TAX REVENUE Under Proposition 13, which was enacted in 1979, property taxes for general government purposes are limited to 1 % of the market value of the property assessed. Assessment of qualifying property, as well as collection and apportionment of tax revenues are all functions performed by the County. Increases to assessed values to reflect current market values are only allowed when property changes hands or when the property is improved. Otherwise, annual assessment value increases are limited to 2% orthe increase in the consumer price index, whichever is lower. Historical Assessed Value Annual Percentage Change 25% 20% 10% 15% 5% 0% 990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 -5% -10% -- Chula Vista -- County Overall Property tax revenues, projected at $27.2 million for fiscal year 2009-10, is the City's single largest discretionary revenue source and accounts for 21 % of the total revenue for the General Fund. Based on projections provided by the County Assessors Office, assessed values in Chula Vista increased by -45- 14% in fiscal year 2007-08 and 2% in fiscal year 2008-09. The most recent projection from the County Assessor shows a decline of 8% in assessed values for fiscal year 2009-1 O. Property tax values have continued to fall during this economic recession with Chula Vista being one of the harder hit areas. The large number of foreclosures have depressed housing values, and the significant drop in home resale prices have dramatically reduced supplemental property tax revenues. Supplemental property taxes are calculated based on the difference between the current value of a property and the resale value of the property. Typically, property values increase as a property is resold. Due to the current housing crisis, most home resale values have dropped, resulting in a large reduction in supplemental property tax revenue. SALES AND USE TAX REVENUE Prior to fiscal year 2004-05, the City received 1 % in sales and use tax revenue from all taxable retail sales occurring within the City limits. Beginning in fiscal year 2004-05, the State reduced the local allocation by 0.25% and applied these funds as security for the State's Economic Recovery Bonds. The State committed to replacing the 0.25% sales tax revenues dollar-for-dollar in local property tax from the County Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF). For forecasting and comparison purposes, sales tax revenues are projected at the full 1 % rate. For fiscal year 2009-1 0, the estimated sales tax revenue is $25.5 million. These funds are collected by the State at a rate of 8.75% for the San Diego County region. On April 1, 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger enacted a 1 % sales tax increase statewide thereby increasing the state's portion from 6% to 7%. The Sales Tax rate is divided as follows: State 7.00% State Fiscal Recovery Fund (Economic Recovery Bonds) 0.25% Local Jurisdiction (City or County of place of sale or use) 0.75% Local Transportation Fund (County of place of sale or use) 0.25% Local San Diego County Transnet Funding 0.50% Total Sales Tax Rate 875% Sales and use tax revenue is the City's second largest discretionary revenue source, account for 19% of total revenue for the General Fund in fiscal year 2009-10. Due to the current economic recession consumer spending has decreased significantly nationwide; a decrease of 5% in sales tax revenue is projected for fiscal year 2009-10. Since fiscal year 2006-07 the City has experienced a decrease of -46- 11% in this revenue category. Sales tax projections will continue to be conservative until it becomes apparent that the economy has recovered sufficiently to merit an increase in the forecast. Sales Taxes Per Capita $300 $50 Co~nty,l\\,erag,"$129/State Average $131 $250 $200 $150 $100 $0 Del Mar $271 Ca rlsbad $216 National City $200 EI Cajon $194 Escondid 0 $167 La Mesa $167 San Diego ChulaVista $145 $107 Iii! Gene ral Reta il li1ilCo nstruction !SIiFood Products IliijBusiness to Business ...Transportation FnM iscellan eous As noted on the chart above, sales tax on a per capita basis for the City is only $107 compared to the County average of $129 and the State average of $131. This comparison indicates that the City's residents spend a high percentage of their retail dollars elsewhere, especially considering that a healthy share of our sales and use tax revenues are generated by cross-border shoppers. It seems clear that the City must continue to place a high priority on developing the retail business base by focusing on projects such as the expansion of the auto park and the eastern urban center in order to ensure the City's long-term fiscal health. Many residents believe that property tax fully funds local government costs. The reality is that the City of Chula Vista only receives an average of 14.7 cents out of every property tax dollar paid by City residents This is less than the amount received by the school districts and the County. In fact, the . . . . amount the City receives is about equal to the amount that the City and the County lose each year to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF). The ERAF is the amount the State takes from both cities and counties to provide additional funding for schools. The City's ERAF loss projected for fiscal year 2007-08 is $6.6 million, for a $60.5 million cumulative reduction since ERAF began in fiscal year 1 992-93. -47- How Your Property Tax Dollar is Spent ~ ~ I Misc. Southwestern Educational City County Sweetwater Chula Vista $0.021 Community Revenue of of Union High Elementary College Augmentation Chula San School School District Fund Vista Diego District District $0.051 $0.14 $0.147 $0.163 $0.188 $0.29 MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE FEES The Vehicle License Fee (VLF) revenue has gone through many changes in the past few years. The fee was initially established back in 1948 and directed to local government. The State had previously assessed a 2% of value VLF on car registrants on behalf of local governments. In May 2004, in an attempt to assist with the State's fiscal crisis, the State dropped the VLF fee from 2% to 0.65%. Except for the first three months of the year, the State back-filled this fee reduction with other State funds, keeping local government revenue whole. Beginning in fiscal year 2004-05, the local government share of VLF has narrowed. Cities continue to receive 0.65% portion of the fee directly from the State, but this amount is now net of County realignment and administrative reductions. The State backfills the gap created by the fee reduction from 2% to 065% with an additional allocation of local property tax from County ERAF funds, referred to as the VLF swap. After 2006, the VLF swap was valued at the original 2005 amount, and increased by the jurisdiction's annual growth in assessed valuation. This revenue source is projected to decrease by 8% in fiscal year 2009-10 to $18.3 million representing 14% of total General Fund revenues. The projected reduction in VLF revenue is a result of the estimated negative decline in assessed property .48. values as well as a reduction in the amount of vehicle registration revenues available for distribution to California cities. FRANCHISE FEES Franchise fee revenues are generated from public utility sources such as San Diego Gas & Electric (2% on gas and 1.25% on electricity), trash collection franchises (9.05% fee), and cable franchises (5% fee) conducting business within City limits. SDG&E is the single largest generator of Franchise Fees and accounts for approximately 50% of the total franchise revenues, which are received semi-annually, in March and August. SDG&E collects the franchise fee from Chula Vista customers and through a municipal surcharge imposed on the South Bay Power Plant based on their usage of natural gas. Due to the volatility of the price of natural gas and fluctuation in usage this component is difficult to project. Trash franchise fees and cable fees are more predictable due to the fixed rates charged and the monthly and quarterly receipt of the revenues respectively. Franchise Fees are projected to remain flat at $10.0 million in fiscal year 2009-10, which represents approximately 8% of total General Fund revenues. UTILITY USERS TAX UUT revenues are projected to grow slightly using population factors and are adjusted downward to account for market saturation in the wireless telecom sector due to the shift in usage of landline telephones to cellular telephones and to internet and other private-network communications. SDG&E is the predominant energy provider with dozens of telecommunications providers. UUT is received on a monthly basis from the various providers. Total UUT revenues projected for fiscal year 2009-1 0 is $8.2 million, which represents approximately 6% of total General Fund revenues. The increase in fiscal year 2009-10 revenues is mainly due to agreements between the City and local wireless companies. The City adopted its Utility Users Tax (UUT) in 1978. The City ofChula Vista imposes a UUT on the use of telecom at the rate of 5% of gross receipts, which represents 66% of the total UUT revenues received. The UUT on natural gas services is $0.00919 per therm and $0.00250 per kilowatt on electricity services, which equates to approximately a 1 % tax. OTHER REVENUE Revenue projections are continually reviewed and updated by City staff. As described above, major general revenues, such as property taxes, sales taxes, franchise fees, utility users tax and motor vehicle license fees, are projected by the Finance Department based on prior history, growth and inflation projections, and economic climate. Additional assistance in the projection of revenues is -49- provided by subject-matter experts such as the City's sales and property tax consultants, the County Assessor and reviewing regional and local economic forecasts provided by the UCLA Anderson Forecast and the University of San Diego's Index of Leading Economic Indicators for San Diego County, respectively. The fiscal year 2009-1 0 proposed budget reflects decreases in program revenues to reflect a downturn in development, decreased attendance at recreation facilities, and the adjustments to grant revenues. -50- GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY T. he General Fund budget for fiscal year 2009-10 totals $132.8 million, which reflects a net decrease of $7.8 million (-5.5%) when compared to the fiscal year 2008-09 estimated expenditures and a decrease of $9.5 . CHULAVISTAGENERA[ FUNP BUDGET . jnthousands (090) FY 07-98 Actual Expendit~res f'(08-mJ sstir;nated Exp'enditures FY O~-10 Budget change FY 08-09 (AB) FY 09-10 .. .155,022 140:630 13'2,844 -!;.5% million (-67%) when compared to the fiscal year 2008-09 adopted budget. As mentioned previously in this document, early in the budget process, the City identified a budgetary shortfall of nearly $20 million dollars with fiscal year 2009-10 revenues estimated at $134.2 million and expenditures estimated at $154.2 million. Through several workshops, and departmental meetings, the City identified net reductions of $20.0 million briefly summarized below: . Elimination of Management, Professional. CVEA and WCE Jan 2009 and Jan 2010 COLAs and the elimination of management's 401 (a) program. D Deferral of POA and IAFF Jan 2009 and Jan 2010 COLAs to be spread out in 6 month increments starting in July 2010 for POA and Jan 2011 for IAFF. . Department consolidations and reductions. . Implementation of budget reduction plan - this resulted in the elimination of 89.0 positions from the General Fund. The elimination of these positions was accomplished through early retirements, elimination of vacant positions, demotions in-lieu of layoffs. and layoffs. As seen on the following table, personnel expenditures reflect a 7.2% decrease when compared to the fiscal year 2008-09 estimates. This reduction is attributable to the elimination/deferral of employee COLAs. eliminated positions, and retirements. Supplies and services are up by 8.2% mainly due to increased costs for insurance. election expenditures and fleet maintenance charges. The Other Expenses category reflects a reduction of 74.0% or $3.0 million when compared to the fiscal year 2008- -51- 09 estimates which reflects the transfer of $1.8 million for public liability expenses from the Other Expenses category to the Debt Service/Transfers Out category combined with a net decrease of approximately $1.2 million mainly due to a one time reimbursement to the PFDIF for Civic Center Obligations. The Utility category show a slight savings from the fiscal year 2008-09 estimates reflecting an approximate $100k savings in reduced energy usage for street lights as well as a savings from energy conservation projects, partially offset by overall increases in water, gas, electricity and phone rates. The Debt Service/Transfers Out category shows an increase of 29.7% or approximately $2 million which was due to the transfer of the public liability expenses mentioned above General Fund Expenditure Summary by Category In Thousands (000) ~t4"'r:f.$J ~~:~ $111,126 $13,557 $4,036 $77 $5,001 $6,834 $140,630 $0 $140,630 Personnel Services Supplies & Services Other Expenses Operating Capital Utilties $125,228 $15,345 $2,744 $892 $4,646 $6,010 $154,865 $156 $155,022 Debt Service/T ransfers Out Total Operating Budget Capital Projects Total General Fund Budget $103,173 $14,666 $1,050 $100 $4,994 $8,861 $132,844 $0 $132,844 -7.2% 8.2% -74.0% 29.8% -0.1% 29.7% -5.5% 0.0% -5.5% 1 Beginning with FY 08-09, various non-general funded positions (e,g. redeve)opmenUhousing staff, development service staff and CBAG staff) were moved out of the general fund and into their respective funding sources. General Fund Expenditure Percentage by Category Personnel Services 777% -52- Supplies & Services 11.0% Other Expenses 08% Utilties 3.8% Debt Service/ Xfers Out 6.7% PERSONNEL SERVICES EXPENDITURES AS A PERCENT OF BUDGET Personnel services expenditures (employee salaries and benefits) are by far the largest component of General Fund expenditures. At the beginning of fiscal year 2005-06, personnel services represented 79.4% of the overall general fund budget, compared to the current budgeted level of 77.7%. At the peak of staffing in fiscal year 2006-07, personnel services represented 81 4% of the total general fund budget and have come down steadily in each of the past three years due to the elimination of staffing citywide. Personnel and Non-Personnel Services Costs Percent of Council Adopted Budget 20% 100% 80% 60% 40% 0% FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 IJiIPersonnel Services !!I Non-Personnel STAFFING LEVELS Despite the City's population growing at an average rate of 2% over the past 5 years, the City's permanent, full time, benefited employees is 18.1 % lower than it was during the 2005-06 fiscal year and 20.5% lower when compared to the FY 2006-07 budget, which represents the peak for staffing. The following table summarizes the staffing changes by service category from fiscal year 2005-06 to fiscal year 2009-1 O. During this period, positions have been eliminated throughout the City including: Public Safety; 16.0 positions eliminated in Police (a 4.4% decrease) and 5 positions eliminated in Fire (a 3.5% decrease), Legislative and Administrative departments (39.0 positions eliminated; a 28.0% decrease), Development and Maintenance service (114.48 positions eliminated; a 24.2% decrease) and Community Services (47.75 positions eliminated; a 41 9% decrease) -53- Staffing Level FY 2005-06 to FY 2009-10 Legislative and Administrative 13950 144.50 140.00 12850 100.50 -39.00 Development and Maintenance 472.23 472.75 458.25 398.25 357.75 -11448 Public Safety 501.50 532.50 540 50 493 50 480.50 -2100 Community Services 11400 114.00 109.75 89.25 66.25 -47.75 Total City Staff 1227.23 1263.75 1248.50 1109.50 1005.00 -222.23 Budget constraints necessitated the net elimination of 258. 75 full time equivalent (FTE) positions from the City's high employment mark of 1,263.75 FTEs during fiscal year 2006-07. Due to these cuts, the FTE per thousand residents has decreased from 5.5 employees per thousand residents in fiscal year 2005-06 to an estimated 4.3 employees per thousand residents in fiscal year 2009-1 O. During this time, the city has seen an increase of 5,100 housing units and 15,565 residents (7.1 % increase), 112 acres of parks (30.0% increase), 4,100 Police calls for service (5.8% increase), and 45 miles of streets (13.0% increase). City of Chula Vista Staffing (FTEs) Compared to FTE's per Thousand Residents 1,500 1,250 1,000 w t-- 750 LL 500 250 0 ..6.0 ..5.5 '" '" ..5.0 '" ~ W t-- 4.5 LL 4.0 . 3.5 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007 -08 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 'N""""'" Total FTE's -FTE's/1000 -54- SALARY INCREASES As demonstrated below, per employee costs have increased significantly during the past several years as the city has sought to maintain a competitive position in the local labor market. Existing Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) agreements with the City's various employee bargaining groups originaily called for pay increases of 4% per year for the next two years for most employees; however, due to the current budget crisis, Police and Fire have agreed to defer their increases as shown in the following chart and all other employees (CVEA', WCE, CONF, PROF2, Mid Manager, Senior Managers and Executives) have given up their raises. From fiscal year 2005-06 through fiscal year 2012-13, compounded salary increases per the negotiated MOU agreements total 27.5% for members of the Chula Vista Police Officers' Association (POA), 26.5% for members of International Association of Firefighters (IAFF), 10.3 % for of the Chula Vista Employee Association (CVEA), Western Conference of Engineers (WCE) and Confidential Employees (CON F) and 6.1 % for Professional (PROF), Management and Executive employees. Summary of MOU salary increase by bargaining group January 2006 ....n.......... ......... ............. January 2007 4% ..................,............"",......,.", July 2007 0% July 2008 4% January 2009 0% .................. ............ ......... ................. January 2010 0% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... July 2010 1% January 2011 1 % ................ . July 2011 1% ... ..... ....... January 2012 1.5% ................................................... July 2012 1 5% .......""..... ................... January 2013 1 % Compounded Increase Jan 06 - Jan 13 27.5% Average Increase per year 3.1% 4% 0% 0% 0% 2% ................. 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6.1% 0.7% 26.5% 3.0% 10.3% 1.2% 6.1% 0.7% (1) CVEA employees could receive Increases up to 4% in Jan 2011 and Jan 2012 based on a benchmarK market study (2) Professional and Mid Manager's salary subject to meet and confer -55- RISING RETIREMENT COSTS The increase in CalPERS costs is a significant budgetary challenge facing the City. The two key factors driving the increased costs were the significant investment losses experienced by CalPERs and enhanced benefits during the same time period. Currently, the payments made to the retirement system equal 15.6% of the City's General Fund. Prior to fiscal year 2005-06, the CalPERS investment pool assumed a rate of return of 8.25% and any market gains (or losses) less than that amount could significantly affect the City's overall contribution rate. In fiscal year 2005-06, CalPERS adjusted their investment return assumption to 7.75% and have since adopted an asset smoothing method whereby any losses are spread out over a 15 year period to reduce the City's exposure to market volatility. The following graph shows the actual market rates of return for the CalPERS investment portfolio relative to the current 7.75% assumed rate of return. CalPERS Historical Market Value Rates of Return Relative to Assumed Investment Return of 7 75% 23.25% 775% ' 15.50% 0.00% -7.75%L- 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 The budgetary impacts caused by the increased employer contribution rates have been significant. The City's PERS contribution rates have increased from 17.4% for safety employees and 87% for miscellaneous employees in fiscal year 2001 '02 to 41.6% and 28 8% respectively in fiscal year 2009- 10. This translates into an increase of$16 6 million in budgeted PERS contributions -from $6.7 million in fiscal year 2001-02 to $23.3 million in fiscal year 2009-1 O. The vast majority of this increase is related directly to the CalPERS investment losses during fiscal years 2001, 2002 and 2003 These trends are displayed on the chart on the following page. It should be noted that the overall decrease in PERS costs seen over the past two years is a direct result of positions being eliminated from the budget. -56- Increase in Citywide budgeted PERS costs since fiscal year 2001-02 $35 $30 $25 '" $20 t: .~ :;: $15 $10 $5 $0 FY01-02 FY 02-03 FY03- 04 FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 HEALTH CARE COSTS Kaiser and PacifiCare/AETNA insurance premiums have increased an average of 8% per year since the beginning of fiscal year 2004-05. Taking into account the compounding effect of these increases over time, Kaiser premiums have increased 59.0% during this time while PacifiCare/AETNA 1 premiums have increased 40.3% over the same period. The annual budget for flexible spending accounts has increased from $8.5 million in fiscal year 2004-05 to $11.2 million in fiscal year 2009-10. Recent discussions with health care professionals indicate these high trends in health care costs are likely to continue for the foreseeable future, with an anticipated increase between 7% and 10% effective January 2010. The anticipated increase in health care costs is included in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget. Premium increases by health care provider (FY 2004-05 to FY 2009-10) January 2005 January 2006 January 2007 January 2008 January 2009 Annual Avg Premium Increase 19.9% 6.9% 8.5% 5.0% 89% 9.7 8.4% 10.0% 16.4% -2.8% 4.0 7.0% 14.2% 85% 12.5% 1.1% 6.5% 8.4% I Effective January 2009, the City switched from PacifiCare to AETNA -57- -58- GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT SUMMARY The General Fund budget funds the day-to-day operations of most city services. For fiscal year 2009-10 the General Fund budget totals $132.8 million, which includes funding for the following departments: . Mayor and City Council . Non-Departmental . Boards and Commissions . General Services/Animal Care Facility . City Clerk . Planning and Building . City Attorney . Police . Administration . Fire . Information and Technology Services . Public Works . Human Resources . Recreation . Finance . Library To follow is a series of summary reports that reflect the anticipated revenues, expenditures, and staffing information for each of the General Fund departments. -59- -60- DESCRIPTION The City Council is comprised of a fulltime Mayor and four part-time Council members. The Mayor and City Council are elected at-large, and each holds office for a four-year term. The City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk, the primary executive, legal and document support officials are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Council. The City Council reviews and approves the budget, enacts ordinances, authorizes public improvements, adopts traffic regulations, approves contracts, and sits as the Redevelopment Agency and Housing Authority. The City Council is also granted some expressly defined executive functions such as confirmation authority over all executive management and department head appointments. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $1,222,849 $1,146,485 $1,080,516 $1,130,770 Supplies and Services $285,806 $135,747 $35,500 $86,248 Utilities $1,456 $1,575 $1,250 $1,444 Expenditure Totals $1,510,111 $1,283,807 $1,117,266 $1,218,462 Revenue Totals $0 Authorized Full Time Positions 14.00 14.00 13.00 -61- ~ "" ",,"i' - 4,.... - -, . . ~. ~ .1 ',f.. -' ,..;;- .' 'B(j)iA"R'IC\S ,A,I.dln, r""M''\:AhISS'I~''''''IS'' \ j ~~l.~ ,'; o~... 't~: ~~~,,; ~.~__jU. ~ ~II~:~. ':?~ ~ ~li~I' ~ ~"I~~I, ~.~ " .:' 'll. L~. ~.~~j DESCRIPTION The process of establishing boards and commissions is one that began with the City Charter as a method to give citizens a greater voice in the determination of policies at all levels of government. Four commissions were established by the Charter- the Planning Commission, the Board of Library Trustees, Civil Service Commission, and the Parks & Recreation Commission, All other boards and commissions have been established through an ordinance or resolution since that time in order to meet a specific need of the City Council. The members for Chartered commissions are appointed by a majority vote of the City Council, with applications for these appointments accepted throughout the year from all interested residents, SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Expenditure Totals l Revenue Totals r A~;~oriz~~~~~~ Time Positions 0.00 0.00 I I L I 0.00 0,00 -62- ~.. - :'.~.j. -:~:-,- -:- " -:-. ;~-~ ~ -~,,-~ ~ ~~~-:. LL~]It;;'1f'-:;~':.w::"'~'" -.""'" ":t;---r.-. - Jr. "":i-:~~--- ,.... .-"\"~ ---:", J;~~1 ."" U:;"""". "'?"".~,",-,~'" €1;,r;-.V"r,.",ED;V", ,"''-t. ....'.. ...>..,c.-'.""" ","" dI.~~\~"..1- ... ........-ll;....'\"!<(,.....l<...~ ~lljl.,.t.'~I:.'~8:1'-:1"';?,~. ~'~. i tt'I\..,."'~'l...;" ~ J . ! ..""L._ ~~.=.'U.....~Z,~"t..L"9_~<W:: ~ ~....~,..._..i ...--;. .....f-"~ ....~.;::;,-.,. :t'_ ..._;:~_ ~:JJ _" '"_.. {..._.....~."..J>._ _....fw-~'!.r,_~.. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the City Clerk's Office is to work diligently to enhance the public and organizational trust and knowledge by managing and providing accurate and timely information; safeguarding and improving access to public records; ensuring compliance with regulations and policies; and administering open and free elections. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $961,892 $893,023 $670,632 $683,789 Supplies and Services $199,933 $296,399 $468,425 $366,921 Operating Capital $0 $2,193 $0 $0 Utilities $1,803 $690 $600 $844 Expenditure Totals $1,163,628 $1,192,305 $1,139,657 $1,051,554 Revenue Totals $90,874 $109,181 $50,000 $35,718 Revenue Recovery % 8% 9% 4% 3% Authorized Full Time Positions 8.50 8.50 7.50 6.50 .63. "'- - ~ 7 <" , - ,""-- - -, ~ -- .-- ~ '_ ~ ~ _ . - - ,_ 'l!r . r~"" ~"::"~ t,-'~ .':.. _ _ C:~I,if.YAl::f9_~'~'~Y.L: '.' ,,''',., , .~ . ~:':l MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Chula Vista City Attorney's Office is to provide legal advice and support to the Mayor and Council, City departments, and boards and commissions in the conduct of City business, represent the City before judicial and administrative agencies in civil litigation proceedings and prosecute misdemeanor violations of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Utilities I Expenditure Totals $2,245,710 $2,062,384 $1,395,911 $1,524,013 $464,588 $462,982 $410,559 $445,805 $11,480 $1,996 $1,298 $1,560 $2,721,778 $2,527,362 $1,807,768 $1,971,378 Revenue Totals $534,398 $390,711 , $366,199 $210,195 Revenue Recovery % 20% 15% 20% 11% Authorized Full Time Positions 14.00 14.00 I 12.00 10.00 -64- ~...... h'';t'..~.~v:'.>A~",Y~~ "'<l'..".TO;;.~ ~.;;';.'(~..:_;:. ~_.';"':...J;:;',}:'C - "':~-;-.Z~~ - ..-;-~- 'T-lf ---"",,""-~ -V--;;-JI"!". ~ ("'.i':~:;~;.2~~":::tta~~~Mr~I~~I!'0\~I~~~~~. :~~.,::1:;~,:'~;~'Llj MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Administration Department is to provide the leadership necessary for the implementation of City Council policies, administration of the organization and delivery of services to our community. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $3,125,602 $2,935,353 $3,854,364 $1,580,098 Supplies and Services $358,078 $212,858 $221,332 $145,612 Utilities $9,235 $2,351 $2,925 i $1,770 Expenditure Totals $3,492,915 $3,150,562 $4,078,621 $1,727,480 Revenue Totals I $569,784 $575,539 $786,819 $403,869 Revenue Recovery % I 16% 18% 19% 23% ," ^"'^^"""n w^"'n"" Authorized Full Time Positions I 21.00 19.00 26.00 10.00 .65. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Information Technology Services Department is to provide technology, planning, development support and management to City employees and departments so they can perform their jobs effectively and meet their strategic goals for the City. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $3,249,009 $3,015,540 $2,781,602 $2,327,914 Supplies and Services $801,476 $701,587 $613,514 $660,156 Operating Capital $84,854 $7,861 $35,000 $100,000 Utilities $62,711 ! $44,590 $44,860 $57,479 Expenditure Totals $4,198,050 $3,769,578 $3,474,976 $3,145,549 Revenue Totals $424,603 $124,382 $67,143 $103,528 Revenue Recovery % 10% 3% 2% 3% , Authorized Full Time Positions 29.00 28.00 23.00 19.00 -66- MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Human Resources Department is to provide superior services to employees, departments, and the public to ensure an informed, quality work force and community, while treating everyone with fairness, dignity, and respect. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $2,915,460 $2,670,004 $2,351,053 $2,107,601 Supplies and Services $1,515,108 $1,188,882 $1,252,598 $1,747,310 Other Expenses $691,762 $1,010,530 $1,943,025 $0 Operating Capital $0 $0 $194 $0 Utilities $7,080 $3,603 $3,104 $3,367 Expenditure Totals $5,129,410 $4,873,019 $5,549,974 $3,858,278 Revenue Totals $322,480 $319,860 $829,035 I $277 ,968 Revenue Recovery % 6% 7% 15% 7% .:..........,.,.c;;;::..:.,.-.c.""."C.-- I - Authorized Full Time Positions 25.50 25.00 20.50 16.00 -67- f;-~U.;>: .o:i""~<.:;"~~ ::., :~-':;;l~~f'1I1!:;I!~I.I\~..t'''~lE~:t.;;;.;;.-.:.~.- .9~;'~~: i'-;,,:~~: '::~. ":S1 ~ '1'!.<';J<-... ~":'.,,.., , ~,~~ m~!;f"'''''''''' ..i-oHf.t'P,lii! ll~~I~~ "_~"" , ,~)~..\,~.,,~j)' f: "~"-";' 1o~_L~:'-' ~"---~1t- "<..,,,,\~,,~,\t':_~J.__I. ~~1',..-r-'~_'~ ~';~A~ ~ ~ .;,.~....U ~'L-..~t!:_A' ~,<L._ ~, 1,4 L...._A MISSION STATEMENT The Chula Vista Finance Department is dedicated to ensuring the long-term financial stability of the City and enhancing public and organizational trust through integrity of financial reporting and sound financial practices. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $2,819,512 $2,780,742 $2,434,203 $2,975,784 Supplies and Services $153,713 $181,919 $165,396 $183,871 Utilities $4,805 $3,917 $3,200 $4,365 Expenditure Totals $2,978,030 $2,966,578 $2,602,799 $3,164,020 Revenue Totals $1,671,553 $1,386,795 $1,205,693 Revenue 53% 38% Authorized Full Time Positions 25.00 26,00 .68. DESCRIPTION The Non-Departmental budget reflects expenditures and expenditure savings that are not directly related to any single department. The budget includes such items as interest expense, salary savings due to the furlough, transfers out to liability reserves, and transfers out to various Debt Service Funds for the General Fund's debt service obligations. This budget also includes all General Fund discretionary revenues. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services ($2,700,756) , ($2,585,366) $298,780 ($621,675) Supplies and Services $29,915 $427,063 $654,344 $180,080 Other Expenses $511,249 $1,303,520 $1,684,531 $652,321 Operating Capital $0 $1,165 $0 $0 Utilities $0 $0 $12,500 $0 Transfers Out $5,357,771 $6,009,891 $6,833,982 $8,688,551 CIP Project Expenditures $400,584 $156,475 $0 $0 Non-CIP Project Expenditures $2,238 $0 $0 $0 Expenditure Totals $3,601,001 $5,312,748 $9,484,137 $8,899,277 Revenue Totals $107,724,236 $101,948,387 Authorized Full Time Positions 0.00 0.00 0.00 -69- 1;"~'-:h_'_:~:;~'EN~j~L sijRNlc,Esh~t~nMA1'cA,~,~,~@!,~illJ:~t :~ :_~'''] MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Chula Vista Animal Care Facility is to ensure the health and safety of animals and citizens in Chula Vista, Imperial Beach, National City and Lemon Grove. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $9,290,037 $8,832,504 $0 $1,740,468 Supplies and Services $1,128,127 $1,212,604 $0 $592,779 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $2,429 Operating Capital $41,499 $20,758 $0 $0 Utilities $337,275 $258,824 $0 $62,778 I Expenditure Totals $10,796,938 $10,324,690 $0 $2,398,454 Revenue Totals $6,204,646 $6,325,251 $0 $783,500 Revenue Recovery % 57% 61% N/A 33% Authorized Full Time Positions 104,75 102.25 0.00 22.25 -70- ~-- ~ ..~<' j~,-", ~.- ,4 ... . .,(ffl ." -., -'ff'- - "": '.; ...~,'" ='.' " . '.~.ip'I:' A' ""1~1'1'''':i'I''"'' 11.\....'1'.",.' B'I,il:I:lLn'I'N" C' , : . " ". .;;;, I ': ;:_" ":'''_J..:-2. . .'~;~... ~'~I:~t~,!~~..lt.'!:ll~ _~~ ~ ~ -' \cl~~~:.. .... _,':.~:~~-' ~~',~.: MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Planning & Building Department is to guide the physical development of the City through the implementation of the General Plan and building Codes. We are committed to enhancing the quality of life in our community by planning for sound infrastructure and public services, protection of the environment, and promotion of high quality social and economic growth. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $9,244,958 $8,175,317 $2,264,505 $3,473,883 Supplies and Services $621,103 $430,629 $58,350 $489,262 Other Expenses $157,256 $165,158 $130,730 $130,730 Utilities $51,922 $30,489 $11,088 $13,653 Expenditure Totals $10,075,239 $8,801,593 I $2,464,673 $4,107,528 I Revenue Totals $7,425,604 $6,824,637 I $2,022,372 $3,186,797 I Revenue Recovery % 74% 78% i 82% 78% =! Authorized Full Time Positions 90.50 80.50 T 20.00 28.00 .71. ..; - ,'-; '.: .:" "_..- ~Ot~IC~ _ ." " ~ _ : . : MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Chula Vista Police Department is to enhance the quality of life in the City of Chula Vista by' - Providing a proactive and professional level of police service ensuring safety through commitment, integrity and trust - Managing resources effectively - Treating all persons with fairness, respect and dignity - Maintaining a partnership with the community to meet contemporary and future challenges SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $44,976,183 $44,015,194 $42,174,039 $40,587,231 Supplies and Services $3,781,797 $3,226,891 $2,961,610 $2,821,823 Other Expenses $66,421 $63,032 $52,171 $81,669 Operating Capital $374,302 SO $0 $0 Utilities $426,877 $463,083 $468,595 $421,806 I Expenditure Totals $49,625,580 $47,768,200 $45,656,415 $43,912,529 Revenue Totals $8,967,142 $7,614,804 I $7,352,521 $7,111,677 Revenue Recovery % 18% 16% 16% 16% ~ . r.;81.;~-'- 366.50 ~I 33;.~~22.00 Authorized Full Time Positions .72. [~ ..-..:..,...-:~,..;. I"f',i-~"'i It> .,'1=: :~'l..."f:;"1 --~,":r~ I ~-, ,-~:' ,J,~''- _, ~.[l 'tii".~:.,.~.-nJ ~""" 'tI * :.-" ""..d~,,, ~'.' .~',..'. ~\ '." ......"~,' , ~a::;;:II'RE i,! .;, ~. ~... ~, _'" ~A'fO """"- '.~.. I!'.... ~ 1; ~<j,,,, ....'"'''' ,__', ..""F '..:C rp..a;t.~.. :.., ,""-.... '...";;, ;\."'.$~~- .(~-~ '~....~_~_~_~__~__..e__ ___~ __-.L:_z~~_..c.'~ ~-d__.___,,-,- _ ~.~_. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Chula Vista Fire Department is to protect life, environment, and property. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $20,935,078 $21,361,720 $20,939,461 $19,021,737 Supplies and Services $1,514,064 $1,981,771 $1,865,410 $1,831,373 Other Expenses $27,000 $0 $0 $0 Operating Capital $24,626 $829,555 $0 $0 Utilities $217,471 $177,599 $189,243 $202,473 Transfers Out $0 $0 $0 $172,216 Expenditure Totals $22,718,239 $24,350,645 $22,994,114 $21,227,799 Revenue Totals $1,618,480 I $2,034,105 $1,781,083 $1,253,677 Revenue Recovery % 7% 8% 8% 6% Authorized Full Time Positions I~cc~~~.~~ I 153.00 135.00 136.00 -73- " '-' .' .." . : .... ,. 'PUBl:I.C',WORKS. . .... :, ....,. ",' J - ~.. - ~ - - A ~ _ L_ _ ~ ~ MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Public Works Department is to provide and manage the City's infrastructure, parks and open space through high quality operations, maintenance and construction in order to optimize mobility, public and environmental health and safety. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $15,716,378 $12,234,936 $15,915,742 $19,177,012 Supplies and Services $3,357,313 $2,528,756 $3,362,422 $3,668,049 Other Expenses $18,189 $20,349 $149,000 $179,175 Operating Capital $156,335 $0 $0 $0 Utilities $1,652,163 $1,652,015 $3,344,100 $3,371,365 Expenditure Totals $20,900,378 $16,436,056 $22,771,264 $26,395,601 Revenue Totals $15,525,508 $10,667,513 $8,187,139 $14,153,208 Revenue Recovery % 74% 65% 36% 54% Authorized Full Time Positions 186.50 150.50 194.75 194.50 ,74, . -~ ~,:.. ~ -' , ~. " , ,..- - -11 ' " ., v~ I " ... _ \'.., .. ',' " '., ",. ,"RECRIiAIION. ,. . ,I., " f,,"':' , ,,~~ _ _ ~~_ :'-"'-" _='~\ A _.:.~~_I-=;:~,! '<'.\ '. . _ _ _~ _ '__"'J~ _ .:...__ _.d MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Recreation Department is to enrich our community through recreational opportunities and services. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $4,728,005 $4,421,525 $4,519,978 $3,586,956 Supplies and Services $932,269 $761,607 $628,806 $549,961 Other Expenses $0 $0 $75,970 $3,817 Operating Capital $0 $0 $41,820 $0 Utilities $507,859 $456,836 $517,743 $476,349 Expenditure Totals $6,168,133 $5,639,968 $5,784,317 $4,617,083 Revenue Totals $2,292,665 $2,164,644 $2,277,773 $1,823,077 Revenue Recovery % 37% 38% 39% 39% Authori~~~ Full Time pO;iti~~ 34.00 34.00 1'38.50 26.00 .75. " , - ... ~. A' .- - - -} ~ -. . ~ , , :. " . . , . ;,', '>,lUG R" RY ,"..." , ., l. , ~. .._~ ~_~ ,_~_ . n J1 .""". -", . - _~ _ _..., _ _ ~_ . _ .!.'__" , MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Chula Vista Public Library is to increase knowledge and enrich lives within the community, We accomplish this by connecting people equitably to responsive programs, services and resources in a manner that reflect the ideals of a democratic society, SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $7,599,379 $6,919,258 $5,955,690 $3,877,859 Supplies and Services $1,667,148 $944,943 $776,601 $881,802 Other Expenses $750 $0 $360 $357 Utilities $374,787 $360,695 $397,049 $374,697 Expenditure Totals $9,642,064 $8,224,896 $7,129,700 $5,134,715 Revenue Totals $2,437,076 $2,081,583 $2,000,620 $347,150 Revenue Recovery % 25% 25% 28% 7% Authorized Full Time Positions 70.75 66.25 I 50.75 40.25 ,76- ("",fl"";- ( >>'""':tL 'I. JI,,). ii' 1'>1'" ~\,~,;.i If. '"..;'., g,!'''''':!dU''1,' I Ii"")!' ,; .' r ,~'~ i't' 'I' "''''1' "......,~ i:l.. -.- II '"'/''''' " ,lifJ.,\ PROPOSED BUDGET DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FU ND -77- DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUND The Development Services fund accounts for revenues and expenditures related to the processing of developmeQt plans and permits. The fund is comprised of three divisions, Planning, Building, and Engineering, which provide direct services to property owners, developers, and the City as required for the entitlement and/or improvement of property. The services provided encompass most development activities, including land use entitlements; public infrastructure, open space, and landscape planning; public infrastructure construction and grading permits; building permits; and inspection of all projects constructed on private property. Historically, all development processing revenues posted to the City's General fund, which also accounted for all development services staffing and associated expenditures. Beginning in fiscal year 2008-09, all development funded staff was budgeted directly in the Development Services fund, with all processing revenues posting to this fund as well. Consolidating all development service cost centers in a single fund clearly isolates development related costs and revenues from General fund supported services; thereby making the nexus between development related activities, costs, fees, and revenues more transparent. This will also assist in identifying any structural imbalances as development fluctuates, with the goal of avoiding impacts to the General fund reserves. The fiscal year 2009-10 budget reflects the transfer of the Public Works function from the Development Services Fund back to the General Fund. As development activity has continued to slide, this staff has largely been reassigned to capital projects, resulting in the decision to transfer this section back to the General Fund. During fiscal year 2008-09, a mid year adjustment was approved by Council to reduce expenditures in the Development Services Fund in response to lower than expected actual fiscal year 2007-08 -79- revenues. The continuing slowdown in development resulted in insufficient revenues to support staffing and budget levels approved with the adoption of the fiscal year 2008-09 budget. In September 2009, a total of 10.5 positions were eliminated from the Development Services Fund. As mentioned previously, the City went through a comprehensive process to develop a budget reduction plan during fiscal year 2008-09 in order bring expenditures in line with projected revenues. As part of the budget reduction plan, Council approved the elimination of an additional 6.5 positions in the Development Services Fund. The staffing in this fund is being further reduced as part of the reorganization of the development and maintenance departments - the Construction Inspection group (10.0 FTE) and Planning and Building Administration (5.0 FTE) staff are being transferred back to the General Fund as part of the fiscal year 2009-10 budget, and 1.0 position is being transferred from the General Fund to the Development Services Fund. REVENUES Development related revenues consist of two categories: development processing fee revenues and deposit based revenues. Development processing fee revenues include building permits, planning fees, other building department fees, and engineering fees. Deposit based revenues are generated through staff time reimbursements related to specific projects. The table below provides a comparison of the projected revenues for fiscal year 2008-09 to the proposed fiscal year 2009-10 revenues. The fiscal year 2008-09 projected revenues reflect the slowdown in development that was experienced during the fiscal year, the fiscal year 2008-09 Council Adopted budget included revenues of $10.9 million. Development Services Fund Revenues Licenses and Permits Revenue from Other Agencies Charges for Services Other Revenue Transfers In Total .:...,...~.:.J..~~m $ 952,234 $ 1,085,854 $ $ 2,304 $ $ $ 3,784,697 $ 3,521,212 $ 2,073,009 $ 888,915 $ 414,500 $ 362,050 $ 7,226,744 $ 5,658,031 A summary of the notable changes by category are listed below:. . Licenses and Permits - The increase in this category reflects an anticipated increase in workload resulting in permit related revenue. -80- . Revenue from Other Agencies - The decrease in this category reflects the elimination of one-time grant revenue received in fiscal year 2008-09. . Charges for Services - The decrease in this category reflects the transfer of the Construction Inspection group from development services to the General Fund ($763,000) offset by an anticipated increase in workload resulting in additional deposit based revenues and plan checking fees. . Other Revenue - The decrease in this category reflects the transfer of the Construction Inspection group from development services to the General Fund ($794,000). It also reflects the elimination of one-time reimbursement revenues offset by an increase in funding from SDG&E partnership grant and CIP reimbursements. . Transfers In - The reduction in this category is related to the transfer of the Construction Inspection group from the development services to the General Fund. The remaining budget largely reflects the Council approved General Fund subsidy of water heater and gas line replacement and photovoltaic permits. EXPENDITURES The fiscal year 2009-10 budget includes funding for 39.0 positions, a reduction of 31.0 positions when compared to the fiscal year 2008-09 adopted budget. This reflects the transfer of Planning and Building Administration (5.0 FTE) and Construction Inspection (10.0 FTE) to the General Fund, the elimination of 17.0 positions in order to bring expenditures in line with projected revenues, and the transfer of 1.0 position from the General Fund to the Development Services Fund. As illustrated in the following table, expenditures in the Development Services fund are weighted toward staffing, much the same as the City's overall budget. Transfers-out reimburse the General fund for citywide and departmental overhead for all three divisions and departmental overhead for the Planning and Building divisions. Citywide overhead includes support costs associated with Finance, Human Resources, Information Technology Services, Custodial Services, and City Attorney. -81- Development Services Fund Expenditures Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other EXpenses Transfers Out Utilities Total -35% -42% 17% -34% 6% -35% A summary of the notable changes by category are listed below: . Personnel Services - The reduction in this category largely reflects the elimination or transfer of 31.0 positions from this fund as well as the elimination of the cost of living adjustments scheduled for January 2009 and January 2010. . Supplies and Services - The reduction in this category largely reflects transfer of Construction Inspection to the General Fund. . Other Expenses - The increased budget in this category is for credit card transaction fees; the development services counter began accepting credit cards mid year, the additional expense reflects the annualized costs of this fee. . Transfers Out - The reduction in transfers out reflects a reduction in the transfer from the Development Services Fund to the General Fund for overhead costs; the reduced overhead charges reflects the elimination or transfer of 31.0 positions from this fund. . Utilities - The increase in this category reflects anticipated rate increases somewhat offset by the transfer of Construction Inspection to the General Fund. -82- '. UE""BLOJ>.MEN,T .SERVICES fU NO' .' ; " 2.36; ; . . A _ _, _ ... ~ ~ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Utilities Transfers Out TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Licenses and Permits Revenue from Other Agencies Charges for Services Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o o o o o $0 o [~,dI,2?2:789;;j[Ji::i~6.Qi?J'28Q] l~"l':" :~I"12'-2'''7~::3'''7''9''',IF;:C''''"ml''1''3.1'':-0' 0'"8~ o L:L':;:i~i;:"-"",,,~'.....,l,';;,;,iUl1JJL;;;;;;Jf1;~,,,;.,!i.,"".,,,,<,~ o ,"1 ;~;:~;" ;:'::r,256''!lli1;''Ii:'''',\;,Ii1!'''B:-48''iFi ,~...u."...,...",;~....~,."...". ,,.,....w C>". ~:;" <,,,t,lI;;,,,.,,.,....,,,,,,,,...,..;. ,,,,,;] ':1'''''1'' """"11'11'" '~'''''''17i;~ 1!!7'lF'T' "';+ "~'~M" -"""'j-;I o [jLji.JULJ&;' 6?lllilo~i'>'~~!;I;J;;;i5L~2Zdll o ~~.;~C::t!~9~~:~~~ji;i:l~ilGm;fJIT!!9:Z:~~;:~~,~i~ $0 $8,956,512 $5,831,292 o o o o o $0 11'"'' .",.". . '"''',''''' mI"" ,,",,",,. ""'''''''''1/ o Lj~JW;i'Jj!t..~?f,!.g,~,~m,~lbLtILL1:;q~~j.?E::!~'j o f\t}7~r.;l 'il,V~jC)4~t.J, !;;r!],t'"'1~4:';J!'~1 r~:"61'1'1 lL.ij~;,...;>;,.,',,;;,, ,;;. .,. ~""'''m',.i;;. .!.I;,';,<,;,i1JL",,;,:','<I, l;.,)""'...,,.J,' o n:;,,:; 3:784':69 7.ilIT~,";'J3:'52l\2121~ o 1i27;?,~]]IQQ9~~:;5it?t~!~1~~ 'T';;';"'""4."1' '4'.~5-0mO"~r ;;P?J"I,~r3"'6"2"rO"'5" "a." o l::.f''''; l' '" .' .Il":~ ",/.,. , ''j .lil.~u."",,,,,,,,".~.. ,,,, '.........". ..., ",,,,j, "~""'''_''. .~"~-' .....011 $0 $7,226,744 $5,858,031 ~''''.".''''''f''...,~"." ""':r:"':;''-'''"''~'' ""~"~"!"T;;"r;lrr;;:!;::,(i!1i:'iim;I~~!HllT~~'n;71!<!~I;t'...!~p!.~FiP,,'r:lITiWi:":..'.;d"~"";:i;'.~!~;::rF1':nr;fir...i'.';i'i".......~i;:rHir!i'''...'':l~'''.''.''T'''..-...'''!ll~,l:r.'::~::al~~"$"~rmlr.""'''''I:~' ; IN EJ!, ~ U N D lACTIVITiY;di"{.II..j'fi'.;.,JI'I'''':':;:,i!;''II~t' '" ;.!';,i!IF:"',i'lj''!dj'i;':': .;ii''',',!""" $O,i<!<lh.ik,;:/',~,J"\'V';;i'~il.$O:T)I.:!,, ($11;729 ;-7,68), 1]11f;':i'tQ,I,,',!I; 26,-739. 1.::~"ilm!.olt;..W.~l:.lll;;.~&.d~uw.;UJ:.J.<;j,,:zl.t!..<.;,i .~"., "'>'~J.iIll:iJWJj u..ol;:~~.:..~:t,;"J;..,l"~~li;~,;.~;'..lJ..lI~,,,,;,~'rilH_l+oIJ,.l.,,<...l..il.:.;.;.~;;;jjj;;_~'h.:LJ1,jJ.:;...;ii;;1:;~lt,;.;;.;;; ,83, .DEv,HOPMrfNl SERVICES,HJND. . . ~ ~., ,_ ,'236 ':i STAFFING SUMMARY - 236 Administrative Technician Assistant Director of Building & Housing Assistant Director of Planning Assistant Planner Associate Engineer Associate Planner Building Inspector 111I Building Inspector III Deputy Building Official Development Automation Specialist Development Planning Manager Development Services Counter Manager Development Services Technician 1/11 Development Services Technician III Director of Planning & Building Engineering Technician I1II Landscape Architect Landscape Inspector (txfr'd from PW and eliminated) Landscape Planner 111I 3.00 C'~;';:,:~:;IQ.oJ.J.:! ~1:i~~~~:~i~I~S~ervisor 0.50 (0.50) ~;;[~!j~i;!~:!~~~!:;~:!~!'1 Plans Examiner 3.00 t'!:}!Er:;~~:6_dJJ,;: Principal Management Analyst ".,!iii!!i":~U:iii;fm;Jfi~.iUii:!?T! Principal Planner 3.00 (1 00) r=iffi::;,2q:g',\'U.] Public Works Inspector 1/11 500 (5 00) ~:'!~U;::':~.!'fiL.:,i! Secretary 1.00 :U:!D;ii\.6:i1rI!iiI:',Qgi!:,':'''Ui Senior Administrative Secretary 1.00 (1 00) IfL:::J'::~::~::!~::"'::.i Senior Building Inspector 100 E":ii",":jTgO'i",: ~:~:~~ ~~~Ii~en;r:~:e;echnician ~.~~ (2.00) :!,I':1!r:;!:1::!!:'{:~~',!\ Senior Landscape Inspector 1.00 (1 00) ,':II,'FS!::!!:i![i:"[' Senior Office Specialist 1.00 JiiE:FT!(j1~;fI,~.[q''':ET:;: Senior Planner 5.00 (1.00) ::~,,,:~:I;::!i'.2iF:'.) Senior Plans Examiner 1 00 (1.00)':':ii.J:;:;'''::.:,?'':;:T'' Senior Public Works Inspector 3.00 (300) U!'.i:!(!!!,r:I,::!,'!,""I"",:i I' ""'"L."'" ..,-,,"- "~, Senior Secretary 2.00 (2.00)'d',.1",)'" "." L! ":!'li'",;.:':"1r"'j"''''''''".,,':;I'I' Transportation Engineer w/Certificate 1,00 - - .,::, ii,' i:':J OO,'J 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 500 7,00 100 1.00 100 1,00 100 4.50 3.00 1,00 100 1,00 ,84, (1.00) (1.00) (2.00) (1.00) (100) (1,00) (2.50) (1,00) (1.00) ", 'Ii "Ji" . 't>.' t'j' 'I' "1""""1". " "~l, . .,' ,. ",~ll ,. lI'1'<''';''''~''~!l.[ V"l -,I",' I"",. ,,~ JI iii 'j" ',1\'1''' .,~'f~,.... '4.....t... J'L:!...Pb :;1, :;;)Jll;;r~;; '!I'~'1;C ,II' II' :~. ..... ~'..! ';~ .....,...,"'.'" II't ",j(/;jj;" '." fl'" 'ii ),,' 'jf, "'11~, f t:,l "",;& /I. j;",m !'I llJj i""ih 'i'~J J~ ~ :l~ ~i ~Ql~\' ~~,A~ ":~....d ~ m.,,,,. 10 t:;..loJ' ';' ~ ... PROPOSED BUDGET REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING fUNDS Redevelopment Agency Funds Housing Authority Funds -85.. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS The Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency was created on October 24, 1972 by City Council Ordinance. The goals of the Redevelopment Agency are to reduce blight and to encourage new development, reconstruction, and rehabilitation of residential, commercial, industrial, and retail uses. Since the Agency's creation, the City has adopted and amended six project areas to encompass a total of approximately 3,563 acres of City territory. Current land uses within these areas are mostly commercial and industrial, but also include residential (primarily high and medium-high density) and public uses (e.g., governmental administrative centers, corporation yards, streets, etc.). In 1979 and 2000, the City financially merged the various project areas into two primary configurations: (1) the Merged BayfronUTown Centre I Redevelopment Project Area (1979) and (2) the Merged Chula Vista Redevelopment Project Area (2000). The merger of project areas allows the Agency to pool tax increment revenues generated in different project areas and leverage them appropriately to create benefit for the entire merged project area. The Agency receives tax increment revenues resulting from increases in the assessed valuation within the redevelopment project areas over the base year assessed valuation. -87- The RDA focuses on the development of sustainable neighborhoods through a variety of investments such as. . Crime reduction through elimination of blight, . Improve infrastructure and public facilities, . Provide funds for valuable public services, . Support small business and enhance jOb opportunities, . Revive business districts and downtowns FUND DESCRIPTIONS The Agency budget is organized into two distinct groupings of funds. The groupings are Redevelopment Agency Project Area Funds and Debt Service Funds. The Project Area Funds are the primary operating funds for the Redevelopment Agency. The Debt Service funds are used to pay for Agency debt service on its outstanding Tax Allocation Bonds, Certificates of Participation and the Advances and other debt of the Agency. Fund 611 and 651 Redevelopment Proiect Area Funds The Project Area Funds are the primary operating funds for the Redevelopment Agency. This fund accounts for revenue received from tax increment within the redevelopment project areas and is used to fund operating expenditures, statutory and negotiated pass through payments, and Agency capital projects. Debt Service Funds The Debt Service funds are used to pay for Agency debt service on its outstanding Tax Allocation Bonds, Certificates of Participation and the Advances and other debt of the Agency. Fund 689 - RDA 2000 Tax Allocation Bonds This is the Redevelopment Agency 2000 Tax Allocation Bonds (Merged Redevelopment Project) in the amount of $17,000,000 The Merged Redevelopment Project was created on August 22, 2000, pursuant to an amendment to the redevelopment plans for three of the Agency's four existing redevelopment projects, the Town Centre II Project Area, the Otay Valley Project Area and the Southwest Project Area. The Bonds wer!3 issued to provide funds for the repayment of certain obligations of the Merged Redevelopment Project and other interfund loans, and for general redevelopment purposes. The term of the Bonds is through the year 2030. This debt was refunded in 2008, becoming Fund 697 - RDA 2008 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds. -88- Fund 697 - RDA 2008 Tax Allocation Refundinq Bonds This is a refunding of the Redevelopment Agency 2000 Tax Allocation Bonds (Merged Redevelopment Project) in the amount of $21,625,000. The Merged Redevelopment Project was created on August 22, 2000, pursuant to an amendment to the redevelopment plans for three of the Agency's four existing redevelopment projects, the Town Centre II Project Area, the Otay Valley Project Area and the Southwest Project Area. The Merged Project Area was amended in 2004 adding 494 acres. The Bonds were issued to provide funds for the repayment of certain obligations of the Merged Redevelopment Project and other interfund loans, and for general redevelopment purposes. The term of the Bonds is through the year 2036. Fund 695 - 2006 Senior Tax Allocation Refundinq Bonds, Series A In July 2006, the Redevelopment Agency issued the 2006 Senior Tax Allocation Bonds, Series A in the amount of $13,435,000 to refinance the Agency's outstanding BayfronUTown Centre Redevelopment Project 1994 Senior Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Series A (the "1994 A Bonds). The original bonds were issued to finance improvements in the BayfronUTown Centre Project Areas. The Annual Debt Service is paid from property tax increment generated in the project areas. The term of the bonds runs through 2027. Fund 696 - 2006 Subordinate Tax Allocation Refundino Bonds, Series B In July 2006, the Redevelopment Agency issued the 2006 Subordinate Tax Allocation Bonds, Series B in the amount of $12,325,000 to refinance the Agency's outstanding BayfronUTown Centre Redevelopment Project 1994 Senior Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Series D (the "1994 D Bonds) and the 1994 Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series C (the 1994 C Bonds) The original bonds were issued to finance improvements in the BayfronUTown Centre Project Areas. The Annual Debt Service is paid from property tax increment generated in the project areas. The term of the bonds runs through 2021. Fund 693 - 2005 Taxable Revenue Bonds Series A - CRA/ERAF Loan Proqram In April 2005, the Agency entered into a Loan Agreement with the California Statewide Communities Development Authority to borrow the amount of $765,000. This amount was used to pay the Agency's portion of the 2005' Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) to the County of San Diego pursuant to Section 33681.12 of the California Health and Safety Code. -89- Fund 694 - 2006 Taxable Revenue Bonds Series A - CRAJERAF Loan Proqram In April 2006. the Agency entered into a Loan Agreement with the California Statewide Communities Development Authority to borrow the amount of $930,000. This amount was used to pay the Agency's portion of the 2006 Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) to the County of San Diego pursuant to Section 33681.12 of the California Health and Safety Code. REVENUES The table below provides a comparison of the budgeted revenues for fiscal year 2008-09 to the proposed fiscal year 2009-10 revenues. 11,034.662 $ 650,723 $ 2,542 S 25.000 $ 772.296 $ 1,492,586 $ 13.977,809 $ 11,451,978 $ 206,609 $ $ $ $ 4,703,743 $ 16,362,330 $ 14.725,385 25.000 Property Taxes $ Use of Money & Property $ Charges for Services $ Development Impact Fees $ Other Revenue $ Transfers In $ Total Revenues $ !':;"';iF:""'...:,......,;,'j':',',;.:~li~'",'<,'"'~, ;;-r~l(;U'J~l.~~;J:t,i. 30,000 6,784,423 21,564,808 28.6% -879% 0.0% 00% 100.0% 44.2% 31.8% A summary of the notable changes by category are listed below: . Property Taxes - The increase in this category reflects the projected increase in property tax increment revenue for fiscal year 2009-10. . Use of Money & Property - The decrease represents reduced cash reserves of the operating funds and the low interest rate environment of the market. . Other Revenue - The increase in this category reflects the addition of CIP staff time reimbursements. . Transfers In - The increase in this category reflects budgeted transfers for a loan repayment to the City's General Fund. -90- EXPENDITURES The fiscal year 2009-10 budget includes funding for 4.0 positions, a reduction of 6.0 positions when compared to the fiscal year 2008-09 adopted budget. This reduction of personnel provides for the transfer of 1.0 position to the General Fund and the elimination of 5.0 positions in order to reduce operating expenditures. )';,': 1:; i' ';;::'!";;;:"'''';~1' :~'~ Personnel Services $ 818,621 $ 989,894 $ 612,947 -381% Supplies and Services $ 562,978 $ 519,103 $ 639,450 23.2% Other Expenses $ 9,995,461 $ 10,879,649 $ 7,757,387 -28.7% Transfers Out $ 2,554,978 $ 6,314,681 $ 13,662,067 116.4% CIP Project Expenditures $ 104,419 $ 221,364 $ 1,025,000 363.0% Non-CIP Project Expenditures $ $ $ 300,000 1000% Utilities $ 723 $ 1,300 $ 500 -61.5% Total Ex enditures $ 14,037,180 $ 18,925,991 $ 23,997,351 26.8% A summary of the notable changes by category are listed below: . Personnel Services - The reduction in this category largely reflects the elimination or transfer of 6.0 positions from the Redevelopment Agency funds as well as the elimination of the cost of living adjustments scheduled for January 2009 and January 2010. . Supplies and Services - The increase in this category is due to an increase in Professional Services expenditures. . Other Expenses - The decrease in this category reflects a reduction in city staff time reimbursements as well as a reduction in pass through payments to other agencies. . Transfers Out - The increase in this category reflects transfers from the operating funds to a debt fund and the corresponding transfer from the debt fund to the City's General Fund for a loan repayment. The increase also reflects a transfer from the operating funds to Housing for the low and moderate housing set-aside . The increase in this category reflects a change in budgeting methods for FY' 2009-1 0 and a transfer out to the General Fund for a loan repayment. In years past, 20% of tax increment revenue was budgeted directly in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (LMIHF). - . - - The new practice will provide for gross tax increment revenue to be fully budgeted in the redevelopment agency operating funds with an amount equal to 20% of tax increment transferred out to the LMIHF. . CIP Project Expenditures - The increase in this category reflects an additional $0.8 million for street improvements within the project areas. -91- . Non-CIP Project Expenditures - The increase in this category reflects the establishment of three projects (Bayfront, Third Avenue, and the Southwest Specific Plan) to capture staff time reimbursements for work on those projects.. . Utilities - The decrease in this category reflects the reduction in the phone service budget to estimated prior year actual expenditures. Note: The tables included in the revenue and expenditure summary reflect the operating funds and debt service funds for the Redevelopment Agency. The following fund summary report reflects only the operating funds; the debt service funds are included in the Debt Service Fund section of this document. -92- .' REDEVEtOPME'Nl AG~N<;Y fU:ND ' d ~ ,," .' '6Q(tJ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Utilities Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures Non-CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Property Taxes Use of Money & Property Charges for Services Development Impact Fees Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 61 515,152 6,133,861 3,335 5,749,708 172,420 o $12,574,537 6,076,772 598,006 o o 58,391 4,000,347 $10,733,516 818,621 552,187 3,875,476 723 2,554,978 104,419 o $7,906,404 6,353,413 295,952 2,542 25,000 764,631 o $7,441,538 >'I,I'r.; !,I":~" .,,, '''~I''~''''''''',:/ 'T'!r.:<'r:"""m""".,~ ..,,~~ .;"1 L~~i.,,;; ~~,Q,9,ijt:~::J] 'J: R:1 ~\,9'G,;J ril?-';-iT5--04-'1--0'=3'~'l1" ;-1lf=62' 9 4'5'Q'1'. ,LL;w;.,;)~l., ;,,,.;,,.!..;,~,w...!tJ ~~:iG:'.:..:jl.rL..,...~_.,,~l "',~, ,"<11' 'n:!!,':""'; "",n."._.....M.-;;',,,'''"'''''t'~''';:'..:'.''..'l'..,,..,,. {~i:Ji~1:2ifi9.:r:3Z.92J.,}L:J:!~j!<~.;.9,~~,,1t9.?,iis: 1'1'-:-7''''-,';;:'''1 :-:'-0"0": i,~~:7irllllr.iiF~ 500-'~ IF.L~j~.dL:,,,~.......,,~_:jCL;.l~5bJ&lljj:Ju:.....,-..J'':~ "'''',:1'5':'1-5-''8''-8--8''4''"'1 ';-111~:,'1""0'" '3.6....4"1:2--2.5 ! _.,;;;h,ij,;"",',:.,q....,,,...,"'..,,;,,,,.:..::."_t,i;uL,,M,,,'. ;'.;;,,,i,,.',,.,,,,,,.,.,.,,,,,~ """Pl'-:,~I'''22-''1r3'6''''4'''': ,,';':"''0''1'' "0' "2'''''5' 00"'0" 7 : ~"""1If:;,t~;:' _. ;--.......,;d WU;:;.:.~...............:..............lij i'l .' I Ii '-', !' Ii' II'" o,rlpj',f1F:'i" , 300' 000 ~ ,LJ~JI~iJi:;:";',,1i,,;litJ!',.., ,,::~ L,~:...i ::1;..11. 'w ,_,' .....".J,';i $12,743,248 $15,980,928 ;'Ffi 4S-j:'97S 1,'''llilWi72S1138S''r ~L!.En";~.,J.k!__=.",i!ij!:;rU...W.i;!.,,:..;.....!_,....,,,;:;:;,)l r;-:':O::::ii!132 609i:Q[TI' ;'~'1:1~;12-5rOO'-0"';'ij .,:, .,,:, ."t.., , . "." "'" ,-.:.1'1; l . "j "~lu_~,~..,,, _.....~..,"'-...,~".,' ....,dl...ll.i'.h."." ."...... """",_ .~,. , ,~::mrrli'Ii8mm::ITmrl)fiF;o'.::j :n:Ji!~~w;;i:::,;mi;~iilrom;F'5':;1 .-"1.1"" JL,,,,;, ,;.,:.;.;.,,,,.ll.~.,,~,.:. ,:, ,,,~l..'."'llWk.h,,)]jllllit>;,.,,,.; .,," ';."':"ft~'[:r- ".~.:' "'II1':1lmtm'~"""-' ''lH.r;'C~,:~,,~, ""'1l'l)r'11-" -r ,', !~II"!" 'i~+lk;,,\;, ,! '111~1 O;ijl..l.~:il,:,,"','jWli, '~"t l;,;~ Oii'i Ei~~b;ill..d..:.' .,....;;.,;.""...,.;,..., ~'~~~;Will;!~~:L[;0r:~1i[TImml:.~QCq:Q9?1! "~I''''"'''II'!"""'unm"w,,w'~'''''''''''''''~''!:\I'''T''''''''''''''''l!''''_",n"",' ;:." ',," ,Ii" 855; 797 ,-:;''',:,,~I., ,: 800: 000 -:J' i:;..llI...... . .....__.....~,'l~c.,.~.;""JII:;;.Jk"'...,.........;.........".. $12,440,384 $15,580,385 :'NET:i'FU"N'D'!:A cTlv'fT;Y'~;i~~j;lmUiji,:"q!,;:'li~li~;l~J(/,";j'!;iJl!:,!rr,irl;~:g;~i:"$Tl84'1""!;021'~'!iii1m::ri;"'$4'64~'8'6'6'':'!);i;j~r1r$30i2t!864"'iti,;i;J!l~1~F"$'400F54'3" i! ',.." ,.,'" "">.,, '" " j '"''''''.,''''' . .".".,..cJ..,J..I. "f.1"""'o.ll';':,.:.,.,.,;, ,i. ..IJ' Ol( ",I...". .... ......,,( .1.,. ".,,' ';. ..,..l,.....,.......,,,,,, ( . <. ..",,, ,. ,. .. l.. ..l...1~11~ ( ~,_.._ ,....,,'..;, "wi..--"- ';i.,h,;" C..,......".."" " "ll') .............."'" .,,""'....__~n'..'.......~ . ...wRld......._.... ...!l,...._~....._.........~___,................,~_.............~~"...............,..-.-.......___.,,_""_ ~~ FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 611 Redev BayfrontITown Centre I 641 Redev Fine Arts 651 So West/Twn Ctr 1l/0ty Vly 652 RDA 2000 TABs Project Fund 653 RDA 2008 TARBS Project Fund TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 611 Redev Bayfront/Town Centre I 641 Redev Fine Arts 651 So West/Twn Clr Il/Oty Vly 652 RDA 2000 TABs Project Fund TOTAL REVENUES 3,655,452 o 8,875,960 43,125 o $12,574,537 3,305,390 209 3,384,520 4,043,397 $10,733,516 2,675,922 o 4,386,982 843,500 o $7,906,404 2,194,130 26,616 5,099,112 121,680 $7,441,538 1':: '1;1;' 4 i4406~3'j':::Iifl1i"5,r652''(ro f':1 :i..,ii.lLI.t.I" , "'''''''.'''''''''M,;c,''''.J uILilll~,~, ' ,p '''>' ;"" I" .,,,,,. 'w....:~ "'-'''~''''I"''''''''''''''''''''"''~I"''''M'''''mtH'''''--''''''>'''1"1""""""'] , ""'1 h,'p"""""'''j,'; '0"'''''''' f"'I"~;; ;""'J" H'O'" ,....;' 'P' .., "'It .. "',. """'41''li~!JI ,,,,; , . ,I ,....\>. ".-" " I" ," ". ' lL ,1'",) ,'3-Ji,!~"'jiJ.l"1.~j!;,,,,: .,;,:1, " r;::"1:~~9'9 '1l51fl!~'9'52i3921~ b:....I~,b"L~ ",_ '1_.'......."...;;,., [:'!j...,.....'~"'"''',J.,_;,..."L:;~ !~:;[~'jmiHlmi!.f:;.:1ml~im:LQ,,::;ls[1~iQillj)j.;::;1ii:!jJ!illnillj1~Q:m: r'li}f?''i;;;lt~i~!ar5jil~~:~srn::;8(55TO'OO;~; ~fu,~.:w.ul.o~d;' ..1, ~_.~__,...;w $12,743,248 $15,980,928 ,-r"'''''' """ .."..'Trr---.-"".......,~'-'-''1 , ,,;:J~,~',449.c9.?..3. .',;}:hlli".t;, 82? 'Jl?f: ";'t'":,:iM"" .. ""'''" ')!'''llrt~~ww;;:.11'~rrti~:')::~:.-..'t111~j~!..':r "-, ;:~:. ,;!I'I,II'" '1' 'nlr;tl',;'O"':L' l!!'f!!II")I","""",,".',:,,! !'!l;." O'~~ aJ"'I"'.:!."";'>"''''-'''''' ',,' '.-,-. luelil""",,'>".w1'" .:.'" ',',. l!1~ I' 7111)l'T1f0~r-;r:'ii1j'r58:,'2'2'3'li ";~."-..,;"~;",.:!..."...;,...!_,..,~,,,<'i.,I...~_;"J..,,,~,,,,;,,,,,..,;,........_)J:1 cm;il(i1~1r'!'i;';;!:;',jll,'ll':!~0"':m \i!:r';\r:f~lmumEn'::IJi~irtr-n~~O' ;:if ^,.... '1". .."..".,...1-, 1.k .' "'.' "'" "m........,,,,I. '1'11" '- ,.;",J. "~Jlll'",, ." ".._,h]",~.~....^, l.i".IT.l.UL;.,....."""'" ,,'.""'''.'''; $12,440,384 $15,580,385 ~~"."".. ."!". "" "''''''",...".".,...-'...-............. ,,-...~. ;r:;!fl?-',1"'j\Pi.,IF~!T....'..I"~:"....:<'!T..:....~ ""'_"::"'~"'" ~""'l"'" "... I'..""".."."e.~>-'.-T.-, ....-.to...." -'il""" ,,.. ". '.-.:"""l';"'<'~ :'""'...,...,',..""..."';.'..,,,....._"'~.~~:'" ":l''TI'''-'1''''l''''''y. -'''''''''''''''1 NE:f.'FUND;ACTlVITY'::"~;,', ':::,1111,.,,;'" "::;II,!'::,:" ($1',841,021)' : :'![,($464,86~)' :;:.il" ($302:,864)-:,,:";i:~: ($40P,~43): ",";ll.I;lJ"'\'.~'"",,,;'.,U'llUl."i";';';;''''';,,,,,,,,,r,.;,-"..",,,,,,,,LI'''''''';;'''''''li,liih..;!,,,,...........,,,,,,,,,,tJ..".j.;,.....M''',''''''''''';'';''!!",_'-:'',\,,,,~,,,,,,,,,,, ..,'\i.,.'.....,,;.;."L':;""',w.lI"'~,,".',. .u".""..",.1I,I.,..;",.".i.f.ml.;.ll<~','", .",,,111..1.\,,,11,....,,,,1,(1\,),,,,,,,,,,,,,," ,,'" -93- If"" ~lY'OfF 1;\ . 1 '\1', '_M',,'" C" ,} ",C"'..', (.." """H"'."'''''J!L0 'n v';' '~..'S.1"':''0~':'''''''~. . '''q'' '}\' "", tA' , ,,,: . > Ii " Ii' r, :,'~", j. -'I ~:' d _. "!<.'" ", ~ ,l ,';;".\ -94- HOUSING AUTHORITY FUNDS The Housing Authority was formed in 1993. A Housing Authority can provide tax-exempt bond financing, own and operate housing, and operate various housing programs. The Chula Vista Housing Authority does not own or operate housing, and the Section 8 rental assistance programs including Public Housing are operated in Chula Vista by the County of San Diego Housing Authority. The staff of the Housing Authority provides comprehensive housing services for the City. The Housing Funds are comprised of the Chula Vista Housing Authority, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Housing Program Fund and Low and Moderate Housing Fund. The Chula Vista Housing Authority fund is the clearinghouse for all housing related staff activity. Personnel expenses are budgeted here, and are reimbursed by various other funds such as the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, and CDBG Fund. The City's CDBG Housing Program Fund includes costs for loans to low-income families for housing rehabilitation. The Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund accounts for a statutorily required 20 percent set-aside of tax increment revenue earned by the Agency for development of affordable housing. As tax increment revenues are generated in redevelopment project areas, 20 percent of the gross revenue stream is immediately set aside and placed in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Those funds, pooled with other federal and state resources and tax credits, provide an important financing tool to assist in the development of income-restricted, affordable housing projects. The Housing Funds will receive $1.0 million in staff time reimbursements for administering the City's Housing, CDBG, HOME and other grants and for monitoring of bond covenants for affordable housing bonds issued by the City's Housing Authority. -95- The Housing Authority focuses on the development of sustainable neighborhoods through a variety of investments such as: . Production of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities . Revive business districts and downtowns . Clean-up of contaminated properties . Neighborhood beautification such as upgrading facades and sidewalks FUND DESCRIPTIONS The Housing Authority budget is a clearinghouse for several Housing Funds. Housinq Funds The Housing Funds are comprised of the Chula Vista Housing Authority, CDBG Housing Program Fund and Low and Moderate Housing Fund. Fund 313 Chula Vista Housinq Authoritv The Chula Vista Housing Authority accounts for all housing related activities not considered eligible for reimbursement by the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Fund 311 CDBG Housinq Proqram Fund The CDBG Housing Program Fund accounts for the revolving loan program (Community Housing Improvement Program) that lends money to low-income families for housing rehabilitation. Fund 317 Low and Moderate Income Housinq Fund The Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund accounts for the statutorily required 20% set- aside of tax increment revenue earned by the Agency for development of affordable housing. -96- ; "~H (}) 8.s n~:<5\ :PRO'C Rl\M fUN [); '.' . ~. . . ,; :".'" - 3~Hr i . ,'>" _'.. _-___ .1.____ ~...~ _____ _. ~ .. __j FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Utilities Transfers Out Non-CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Property Taxes Use of Money & Property Charges for Services Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o 88,598 475,863 100,362 o 299,079 o $963,902 2,294,709 391,618 58,897 7,337 1,124 $2,753,685 611,220 75,919 5,637,944 87,559 466 1,733 8,960 $6,423,801 2,758,665 556,304 95,450 768,383 o $4,178,802 [':~"';":S2T3~'-5-;r7:;1"i328856;j:l .',,,,",,,,:J,".~,,.......!....,,,,..~,,,.L<~.......,.............,............,,.Ja liI;'7:-:: ,270"OS(FTr':":';,270 080 'i ;',. .. .".,!,.,i,....;<,,", .;... !,....... ".,,,;l!~~,m~,,~;' """i"'''''''-'',!k"-,;,,,,,';'x,l . ...,......... . '111~V.:i'" . ......... . ,;. ,:.1,t..2..4,?1,4:;J~b,"!:!Jll"Q.99lj .---.....-.,........."--J r.~-'-m~"'''''''''-]j' ,. '.., "'''6 000 """.~,. ""'6000' Lt.i~.:Jh.jt.,.L;-;."",: ~"n:~B~"!~'~_'M'" fji!~;~ijli[~gr~".. :'i[[::0iJtdl;,~)'$"1:i : ':-;::;2'75,84292]:1 38::' , ........_.... ,......_, ....,-.............j 1"l"~''''H-OT'"-:''''' . "W','" .' :'"I~:t"R!~m>+3j;]?'r----''':I~ .1f:,4j.F:,':':J ,~!);!lt ~::::, 0, i" ,:~,j:, :,.:rJ;1't~" ,h i !;.; 0 ~,' i .,-,~;,-...-...;""...Jl:.,..........;.;...J;""'~~""'_~04;"--.I $2,610,301 $6,489,660 1 ",,1"2''';"6-9''6''5801'' ':,....,.,......' ",,' '!"'O"J' """"'''''.-, , ''1.,..,l".:..,."il,_,!l,..';I'''-'':'; ,. .."" .,.c... ,..... , ".."..,. _...,.......".,.m,ICi.J, """ ,.,. ., .. :;iiiUllif33 :'169'i'l :::;;':,; <:':11;1"8;636; 1 ,...,.,..-..m,Wl Wi~'k,'... .",,=~,!ll ..I,~,p"..,..,.., .,lj"""'~-,"",h' "nJ Ii ;",I""li"'63 442';;1 ~lq~i~li:;63"442:11 1-:;.;1~;"1'iLi6h'__'-,j,............t:i~ ' "').......'J.,.........Ju r::;r~ -'-@;!;l r.'''''''='==...._~ry "',.".",' 949000!. '..,.;,,1"016'341" ,.....,'.....,. " ,. ,,' ". '...'.. , ,.,..1; n.._.. .,.._.J~ I...."",,,,,, "'u...."'(, ;..lL.."I~,...., ."".h..."",~,~,>....~" . k :',!::iIi~:~~, 71Q:r@~i~:.7,Q~;1\,~~6:: $3,900,931 $8,120,065 ""~"~""'__h""",...,,,,,,,, -~,.,....._,.....-..""t''}':illf.!I':'.i'J1::1'''-'11~'~r:llr::rlt!''',"",lr<;''m~Ir-:mnll-''''''''''''''''''''''''''.''''''' '''''''''''1-''''~-'-'''~'><'1t''''''''''''''''''j~1~".~1''''~!'''!'''''''''~'-'-'-,";:1t~"""'1""''''I''''''''''!I'l'j'''''''''''1'1 NET..F,UND'ACTIVITy.....II:.II"lli"'I:i": """11,,,,,11:11',,::' ."'i'n':il.!',,: $1;789,783 ":"':($2;244;999)' . $1';290,630:' .II'" $1,630;405:,1 ; .l'.. :,,, "j:._,JI:;lJj,"I',,-,,;,-_,,., ,;""Ill!IlJ;;;lim,."'!''-''''''''';' ,IUIIJ,;.", ,:,:",..-"..."]..,~"d",,"L',.,,_,,.,.:i.il;(P.li-I.lll,:,l..'''''''''';'-''''''U'':W;'~:'""", ,. ".,.,:,\~;..I" .~,,,',,, "v)".,'ahjjh~..;,I"','",.,..",,,i.u,,~l1l;c;,,,,,,.,,,,-,..,,.l\'."",L:ll,,,,,,,;,;,-,,,.;,-,,W;ldla~,i.:,,-,,,,,,,;,:, FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 313 CV Housing Authority 315 RDA Housing Program 317 RDA Low & Mod Income Housing TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 313 CV Housing Authority 315 RDA Housing Program 317 RDA Low & Mod Income Housing TOTAL REVENUES 37,044 431,059 495,799 $963,902 63,109 24,624 2,665,952 $2,753,685 611,954 157,453 5,654,394 $6,423,801 734,205 167,251 3,277,346 $4,178,802 V? ..:,,1 ,024':fi6"S111p(""1\o'2'iili3o!"'1 "''-., '", ".,JIII,;""""w,"_ ",'.__.;,.,;,~l", !:i~!~;,.",.,.,.;"."",,,,,....,,,,,,,,,, ",';".~ "':lil"liCW.., . "0'''11111''..... 3920'1600 ~,L:.ji..1ill2!tlJ~;;;::;\i<t::.....:Iii UUlJ.j~~,.., ,,"....-., ~........._~~l !;r;I;'J~ 1 :585;:4'36 "1J1i:1C!~ 1';'5411;43"6111 Li..."" ,.. .""'. " ...........l_""'-....,._.~.,.~ $2,610,301 $6,489,660 ["F :f17'iT182~'11l'~~"3..52":955..' :;.:.i-,',.~~"......_.'!.;;_.,;:J!:J;.l:.b.lt(i"'.;"......,.. '......_,"':>J ~""'""''''-''Itl'-!I''''~'''''~'' '~.l"I...ll.~'I!(.. "'l'~..'lilllm:""'"'....g H'G:y.i!;1i,~j'\;n,:,T.'IO.,;; {!{,!:'g!.,:','\ii[;':';'i HW~::OiiL 'M""..,l"Jt'I."lHj,i::,,,.,,.,,,,,,,,,..ll "~,h';,,,,,,.-,,,,;:,,h,h tltk.,,,,,,,,,, '{.,J;C729:7,4~J:ri"I':6)'67Ti~16 ;J t;lli"... . ........k.""....~_..:!l\.""_..,_"...._._..,,.,,:J $3,900,931 $8,120,065 I"""" .,. ~""""r'"'''''''''' ....,,,'"',"',"',....,,,,,,,,, '"'''''1ml''''''l'*~~''''''''' '~:1m:r"-" """r"~"~'~"'r'''''' "," -'''"'-'....''~,,,..., ~::I!!:t......,.":.....":'."."..'I....'..'...'''1.,;1!:.i::.~'.:''i""'-'7"'"'' ""::"""""""'~lr:l1"I"'11"'~)"::"''''''''''1p''~''' ""'t!I 'INET,;F.UND ACiT;IVITY \;111"""1' :':..':,,'::,11':..;': ."::1I.1::I!'1 $1,789;783, ..::($2;244,999); ,,$1,290,630,1 ':',Ii $1,630,405 ! ",,,,;,',,'~'l',l>iilll,j1l:'~"v ....^....,;,:i'~,lill;i",,,'i1:;':J,,d, ~j..',~,j~L,.,.".-,' ,,,,,';m:Jilil';l,,,-,,,,,.,,i~,...J)J,...- jl,,;1,'.- ",;'.,.'_<l.M~"'I...",,,,. ~,~lr_~"~lJ,,.., ",,,,':u.~IIUf,,,,,.,,,,!.._,,,.;, ,.,. ~,,,,,...ll!';',.,;"'" ,.,,'~, ,"'("-lib!:..II,;.-......- ..-..~",=Il:<l,"..'!";'^__..__.^ ..97.. , - - --"" - I ..-RE[)EV,ElOPMENTAGE~~YJ~~~!> )' :~_ : _ ' . ;'6Qe;j STAFFING SUMMARY - 651 Assistant Director of Redevelopment and Housing Chief Executive Officer (CVRC) Community Development Specialist I Community Development Specialist II Director of Redevelopment and Housing 1.00 (1 00) (formerly Director of Community Development) Housing Manager Principal Community Development Specialist Principal Project Coordinator 1 00 (1.00) !:;;','[',");-;.:\.:' Project Coordinator 1111 2.00 (2,00) t:,ii"(i',!"i[;'.";'j Redevelopment Projects Manager ';\i!i:;!!!I:!~'l;.12!:i Senior Administrative Secretary 1.00 i,.'jjIU2::wl'.OQ.!J,'l Senior Community Development Specialist :':;,i:~;!:I;;~.':-' . Senior Management Analyst "".l:~.i~:!Imr!,1!:~j~"n.;,nJ:] Senior Project Coordinator 3.00 (1.00) 1"),.';i;!:):!i?:OOi!~JI ~;;~~i kll i1f~Li]lflIJ~~HfQ. .98. 'I' "i" ,- ,q I"~ " ':~1j. . l ' ..1:... _,~ J,r~p "......~ """, ,......m;;';.,: "i~"l'~r n~- ,_,' ,1, '1_' !; ~'''''.J , ""'-"_j..;"Fi '''I J q f-'-t-''''r'' !-, ' 1~ ,_ J',:>-<"", J., . J, "I' r,( f'."l ;11,1'( 'y, ,:! I,;"jlf ~~'",,".;,. .j~, "f "1,,,,/. , j;;. t."". L.. :.j PROPOSED , SEWER FUNDS BUDGET -99- The sewer revenues enterprise funds account for and expenditures related to the City's sewer programs, including maintenance and expansion of the City's conveyance system and payment of San Diego Metro wastewater treatment costs. SEWER FUNDS 'SEWER,FUNDSAT A'GLANCE\ .. . ,I', .:' '::.: ".. . ""'.: ,~. . ' ; .. ,', 'j,. .r.".. .'," ": " Number of Billing'Accounts:,' ,::' . '" ,,47,545',' ,. '.. !.I:" .; :"-""",.: .,_ !':.': "''''~'''';':' ,-':''':':V,:,_,''!', .. ",':,'< .j ", :.;W' Miles. of Pipe fv1anaged ".476 i' ,.' '!, ': ~!: ':'.. ..' '.. .' :..::;. ........,;: ~ " ". .." ' ','; h.. ' ". ;.................... ,,,, i 1\ '; .. Daily Trea\merlt Ri~hts (fI>1GDS*) 21 "":"..:';"",'- ,.. :1. ,.,1.: ,_, .. ,',,",.,',,', Average DailY.Treatinent (MGDs*) 'Aqnual TieatmentCost' ,', "."'.. ..,.. , , ,*Million gallons p~r day \::1-':""1" '/.,1 The City of Chula Vista provides wastewater conveyance and treatment services to approximately 47,545 billing accounts, including residential and non-residential uses. The wastewater generated by Chula Vista customers is collected and sent to treatment facilities in the South Bay and Point Loma through the City's extensive sewer collection system, which consists of 11 pump stations and over 476 miles of sewer pipe. The San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater System provides wastewater treatment services to the City of Chula Vista on a contract basis ($18.2 million in fiscal year 2009- 10). The City is currently analyzing options to secure sufficient treatment capacity to see the City through build out. This treatment capacity may be provided by either purchasing additional treatment capacity in the San Diego Metro Wastewater System or construction of a wastewater -101- reclamation plant in Chula Vista. The following figure illustrates the City's current trunk sewer network, which conveys flows to the San Diego Metro trunk sewer (shown in red). .~ - .&::'- . ~ --, { --,...' i c::::=:::I \ --\ ! ,_.~.".l, r' "" .' , ,." ,,:,.!'~' ,;1;;;"'\ \ 1 I I I \ ,\ .! . ~' \ .-."'" ,- , I~, . ., :'.;. rr lb .~ '--"'-~ ~=\ I ' '..1 j..,J', p"- !:~\' i" ~i,' ',,', _ - " " , f" .:, :i L,;;,,,,\ ..,.,. I - ..,.,.." - --- .....,.." 'liD Main StreeUSalt Creek Sewers Salt Creek Trunk Sewer Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer Poggi Canyon Trunk Sewer San Diego MWWD Spring Valley Trunk Sewer San Diego Otay MWWD City of Chula Vista Boundary The City of Chula Vista offers exceptional wastewater services to the community, For example, in fiscal year 2006-07, the City experienced only 2 sewer spills, or 1.3 spill per 100 miles of pipe. This is less than 50% of the regional average of 29 spills per 100 miles of pipe, as reported in the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board Executive Officer's Report, dated May 2008. The quality of services provided is also reflected in community opinion, as evidenced in the 2006 Citizen Survey. In this study, respondents were asked how they felt about the services they receive from the City of Chula Vista. Responses were then compared to other jurisdictions with populations of 150,000 residents or more. According to the survey results, an above average number of respondents reported satisfaction with the wastewater services provided by the City. Continuing to provide this exceptional level of service in the future will create significant challenges, including: 1. Securing sufficient treatment capacity in the Metro System or building a wastewater treatment plant to meet the demands of additional growth; and 2, Maintaining a growing and aging infrastructure system. In fiscal year 2007-08 the City transitioned its sewer funds from 'special revenue' funds to 'enterprise' funds. Enterpris.e funds may be used to report any activity for which a fee is charged to external users for goods or services, and are appropriate in situations wherein there is either a legal requirement or policy decision to recover costs of providing services for an activity. This change complies with the GFOA recommended accounting structure, should the City decide to issue bonds for capital improvements solely guaranteed by sewer fees and charges in the future. -102- Fiscal year 2007-08 was also the first year in which non-General funded positions (wastewater maintenance crews and wastewater engineering) were budgeted directly in the Sewer Service Revenue fund. Previously, these positions were budgeted in the General Fund, which was then reimbursed through a series of inter-fund transfers. Only those positions 100% funded by sewer funds were transferred out of the General Fund and budgeted directly in the Sewer Service Revenue fund ($3.9 million in fiscal year 2009-10). In addition to personnel costs, all supplies and services, capital, and utilities budgets associated with these positions were also transferred from the General Fund to the Sewer Service Revenue fund ($0.6 million in fiscal year 2009-10). The remaining wastewater-related General Fund positions continue to be offset via inter-fund transfers ($3.3 million budgeted in fiscal year 2009-10). As a result of these accounting! budgeting changes, the fiscal year 2009-10 budget for the sewer enterprise funds is not directly comparable to budgets prior to fiscal year 2007-08. FUND DESCRIPTIONS Fund 411 - Sewer Income Fund This fund is used to account for all revenues collected to recover the City's costs incurred constructing the public wastewater system. The funds are collected from new properties receiving a permit to connect to the City's wastewater collection system The owner or person making the application for connection pays fees to the City as designated in the master fee schedule. All funds received may be used only for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of sanitation or sewerage facilities, or to reimburse a subdivider or any person who has constructed sewer facilities benefiting other properties. The fund may also be used to reimburse the City for any expense incurred in connection with the construction and installation of any sewer facility including engineering work and acquisition of rights-of-way. Fund 412 - Special Sewer Fund The Special Sewer Fund is used to account for the sale of the City's excess Metropolitan Sewerage capacity. Fund 413 - Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund The Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund is used to account for sewerage facility participation fees received from the owner or person applying for a permit to develop or modify the use of any residential, commercial, industrial or other property, which is projected to increase the volume of -103- flow in the City's sewer system, as determined by the City Engineer. All revenue derived from the sewerage facility participation fee shall be used solely for: 1. Paying the cost and expense to repair, replace or enlarge trunk sewer facilities of the City so as to enhance efficiency of utilization and/or adequacy of capacity to serve the needs of the City, or; 2. Paying the cost and expense to plan and/or evaluate any future proposals for area-wide sewage treatment and/or water reclamation systems or facilities. The City Council can appropriate the funds for another purpose, provided such purpose shall be for the planning, design, construction, maintenance or operations of sewage collection or treatment or water reclamation purposes. Fund 414 - Sewer Service Revenue Fund The Sewer Service Revenue Fund is used to account for all monies collected from the monthly sewer service charge. Monies in this fund may be used for any and all sewer related activities. The primary use of these funds is the payment of the City's annual San Diego Metropolitan Sewer Capacity and Maintenance fees and to pay the operational costs of the 'in-city' sewer collection system. Fund 428 - Sewer Facilitv Replacement Fund A portion of the revenues derived from the monthly sewer service charge is deposited into the Sewerage Facilities Replacement Fund Monies in this fund are used solely for the purpose of paying the cost of refurbishment and/or replacement of structurally deficient sewerage facilities including related evaluation, engineering, and utility modification costs. The City Council can appropriate the funds for another purpose provided such purpose is for the construction, maintenance, or operation of sewers or incidental thereto, including any charge for its collection. Funds 431.432, 433 - Sewer Development Impact Fee Funds These fees are levied against new development in specific areas of the City, based upon, the sewer facility their project will impact. The monies collected are used to fund construction of public improvements designed to increase the capacity of the subject facilities, allowing the City to -104- maintain service levels with increased demand. Included DIF programs are the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin DIF, the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin DIF, and the Salt CreeK Sewer Basin DIF. -105- At"" i~ "nt'" \' i'r)I"" ~ ff. A " ,r ,\,-~ >" " """ ,.., r~ti!=~,,".lJj \,. '~L"" \" '1; iiJIL. '! !,!'l ;~i Jf..< '~' j ~ L ~ . ~ . . . -106- 1m , EaF U NID" ' , , ; .' '.' .' , ':',' 4~ '0 ! ~ __""_ _ ....f.,"'.l _.... _ _, _... _ __~ __ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Utilities Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Charges for Services Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o 16,082,823 o 14,992 171 9,358,703 1,375,092 $26,831,781 1,339,325 28,128,566 373,410 755,579 $30,596,880 3,512,916 18,440,142 4,967,986 652,140 6,640 4,755,301 2.743,187 $35,078,312 6,090,269 29,155,385 337,176 174,258 $35,757,088 I;: i":) ;932('384 :;J~:rl;'3~980 ~787;:~ L._"".,.;,.._.......,_..~......., '. ""', '........"''--~ 1:'--19:609, 5 f3-,~;:iir'1 9;:151,821' L;~.^~,<~~......". ;; .,~, "......:,'~,..,';.u ..l;.~;,.;;. N,~,.....,l<"k.,._,,,;,,,,;,..;,. " !('.l'"'""'~'- "r" 1""'"~"''''-''-'''''' ff'fffin"~'''''rn'''''''' ,,,,,,~. '''-''':1 tU~t[~~~{~;2,9X"d!::1r~jl~'jJ..Ri,~~1::iJl r'-' o;:"1i'!790';Z::12ll'~I:i;]1'575'951f ffi.J:::'_lilll.:;;..Jt"., ,,_< '...,J;., _~.:J ~li.dJ:L:;~;d,,",,~,;,;,; :,',....~;,.;i!j tl~~~~.riG\i'o:6~57"l MI' ',~7~:q:6~961~ ;.:;", .,h....~'.l',. . ,"""........._" ........ m...,,,;;_,Am;;-.....,___,~........~,,,:~1 1.":r:;1'620'665 '11111": jlli37 9"95" lJ:;,,0,JtLJ>..' >>,,,"..,,,.!_,,,Dill~;;;h:;LL,~!;...,,,,,,,,, ,........H;;;i(' E'Cnn 0}:~~,9. .:G1:::'1:i];C[~TQ9..9.::J $31,110,516 $28,892,353 i:1r:::'i-09.:F525Vr.r1i;j"10941S251l fj.,Jb!:....!.H.."',l;;".'....."'........:iwlaJtc;,~.,;.".~..........:.....!.~_...,,'"~J: r, . 'j-3','o9Ei;:2E;'Q'Qlm:'-29Tl'83:'228, L""...;".R'.... ., ..^,'U,", j..,,~..~.dl..~I,..^,...M,,~.~,t:,. ", ."~,_,,~;.,,, -]r,;N--........----'1l~4--.----_...~-,.._~ <8,:,',. ll~ 462.j232:li lj }jl,? .Hf 351 ':266:1. 1.1~.",,,,,,,,",,,,.h,,....,._,",_.,,,,..,,.;.Ill ,w",,,,,',,b,,,,,,,,,J.., ,-,~",n. I, ,':~i~r619'1768.r<~lm:: ,'ii,1'7 4'258 . E2";~.":b,,,~,_..!..~.,,,_,,d...!IL.;;:;;;mn.:.:......,....~;_.......i,;;, $35,274,785 $31,403,277 ",""'.tw""'lt~, '..' 1~'''-''''''''J''''';''J!''''l''''''',''"';~,,,,w''rl'''_'_:'~W'l'1)')''''.'l'I"II""C";-""';'jl:'!w'o",p~rl~lrll';' . ,~"~""'.,,"r.';"',""'''''U'''\w;:'''''''','''Jl~''''''' :'..'m...."'w,"',." "l''';!lt~r~'''n,~'-''''''''r;'''''':''l''''(f''I''''''-''''~I''''I'w,,'''-'~I""""''''l''Ml'''~'''''.'t NE;TFU ND'ACTlVITY 1!11;,~, ;I~;:;jiin "I,ll:';{; ;Ii ':i;::i;;[: ' $,3;76!i,099i ':-:!~il ;:'1 $678,77~ ". L: :"~,4!164,269:'li~ ",$2;51 0,924::, ,dL,.....;:J,,,..,,.l1-:~l;.;J""~""'.a."",,L;IJi';),WJ).,J""'''''',~H,.ilillltnll>l~h.~l.d1i2.J,,-.!il",-,' jk.J,,>,<;,;;'_='h.,.~;Ii..,J..,!., ' ' ;,;,<<.il;.;w,"'"'.Ll!l.A"U~"~'''''''I>iM,;>i....UIIl'b"di.lliJ:~"l.J.~~''lli''''''..iI'''''~,!f~ EXPENDITURES 291 Sewer Income 292 Special Sewer 293 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 294 Sewer Service Revenue 411 Sewer Income 412 Special Sewer 413 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 414 Sewer Service Revenue 428 Sewer Facility Replacement 733 Sewer Facility Replacement TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 291 Sewer Income 292 Special Sewer 293 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 294 Sewer Service Revenue FUND DETAIL o 4,632 651,367 25,504,489 o o o o o 671,293 $26,831,781 90,739 23,022 5,269,833 23,578,026 -107, o o o o o 100,000 6,476,438 27,354,914 1,146,960 o $35,078;312 ""';""'~""1'/If"'","'~'m-J'!""""~"~7"''''~''"''!'1~'mb""Wrnfl"~' t:i:",!!LW~:I.;:2i:iJ!iliiilili~q1J~jHU!tJmilJ:uUiim!mi~h..QJJji 1....",""c.;;m'''''1T'''''O-,I"Cj~1 . "7lf'l-'0'- ~.'" ;. _",'~ ,,:ma ~;;~ 'r,~:'" :', "1'"'' [.,'l.' "', ,t,"ha,l ,,',,' 1..<', '---:'}'.~' " .',""', .".". '. . ~ '.' .,' ..,.". '., 1')'.""." ,. .>'. "."~.L ",,~.i:L, .)",ill..l~..;.;", .."., ~! ~ll.l' J.." ,l:.;! ~lt..l.", ~ "M; ,~,;;'."""j), lli~'iu!~~j~Jr]~illf1[QJ!1~[;;2;~~i~;ijilllllilt;gj;J iiI" '.. "," '1I1I'T6[''7;lU, I r " 'l"Ji:" , o'q ;, """i!;,h,;;:J)!~::;)I..~~",,, "Jj~,L 1"",,:~II~Ll,,;Li:,uL.,"~ I , :''1''''.... .. '1:111'\.0 :l"i" ' "'I'""; ,..tfllFO"" jj"']~ l',,'!~llillillj".'i": .'."j ~'j:t'da1L:~'iL~ r>N"lt"r:""-~--"~"'Jrt:<""~"""""""'f...r;:::i)J . ''-''1' ""h5'0"" 304 'I "'"j" '1''''''''''', '0' . :"'..1.".. .. ,.IIl...;'.'.,..'.'...."..,..:-:.'''',..,.. "k:ij;~UtiJl.(, "",~"",,;;;;L ".;j,,,,,nJll,l;1h''',,,,.:l1lljk,,,;,; Ii: Y"'~i(22':oi'i4)"JSif,:iml:91i: 000", .. ,. . ...... _.~, ,. .~---;;;;;, r"2i'F858~619':ll!f:';;'2-'7,,:;rofi095'~ ,;'-.; ::;;':::,,,,,,,~,',; ,....,;,.,"~~,~.,'".,..,;,rl !l!ir:i:,.",.,,,l;~J,,:,... :....' ,.",,,,,..... .(, r,=,';'''2':32;:f2851~,[~ ;:'~874:25"8i ~ .c.........--;,..,.............~-" . ........~ p:m~~i~f~i;if(::;!,1mJ~,~;J1i701ill~%p1~:ry!?r:rr'ill:.1f:J'c)j , ,'" ,. ,'~l~ H",,,^',,mUW"n'~" llliL."..,;Jilji:;.,"..""IlJa."" .... $31,110,516 $28',892,353 o o o o :'SEWER FUNr:;~ . : -;" ';", - - - . - .:~- '41:0;': I _ -'"_ "=_ _~_ - ~ ~ .. __ _ <to _ _ _ _ ~ I 411 Sewer Income 412 Special Sewer 413 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 414 Sewer Service Revenue 428 Sewer Facility Replacement 733 Sewer Facility Replacement TOTAL REVENUES o o o o o 1,635,260 $30,596,880 92)03 22,518 7,206,885 26,518,263 1,917,219 o $35,757,088 IT,'I;:;T'Wl:i1J@:J)i:"r6':':';~i;~n\;!!,i/"''1n!mt.:IL~1,!~,'O~ij~ ...."---....,- -"""''-._._ _._u.......;J,.<-...;_,".JI!JL ,JL,.~....,..J ['0~iv ,:~,.';~'~":r,:"cfq _1:::;1 '[ T{n;r:r;:;;67~ "......"'...:""i:tJ..f",,,,,.,......,,,,....L..IL..J,,I,..., ,...Ili.h.,;;,.,.,,,,.'jl:f nw;,,,".'S'3'5'9'n462'L~q:,1rrjii, '.~r'6'6fF864'n~ ~;~ ......2......_..~,'l...........~,~ILJ.:;~jJ,...,!.,_._i_!....~_,_:.!j r:L7~~:~ii.rb.}}:1[~:2!;IQ"1!, 09tL! I:i ,"1':5"28','308" ::;':';iV;:1:693:,'318'~~1 [......,_,...... ,.,.~..~.~ ....."'-.. .tJlllL:,m:;..]::..... _...... ._,,--_" i"'Tj " ' " " " 'O-1ir"-'-"~-~I"":--OGl' I,.'j, ..,' "~""" 'i. .!,,1. 'J''':'J'~.';',~~,.,..>.... ,,, "",-"." .'''.'''..'''., ,..._, -., ""'-' ",'.,.. . .........,'__....,j,_.ILJ..'.T~..L_"....,.,II...L,..,;,..,.,'\r,,l:jk.../i,'"",,,, $35,274,785 $31,403,277 ."'lft....,'......~r"'V'"'"..-,,--~i!"!':'j<,w.,. .0~j!' . .J~~::'I"':r~~P..,~1J~:r,........,....,.,...-'.".."""I1'""---" ,....~.:.~-.-;;:;;:a~....",..,...,'~..I. ., '''.~._.;rt::r."...~'''7..,,,....~,.,....~, !NE~, FUNl:!,ACTIVIJ,V:"ii:'II!,.i" "H',! i:::" "t"I(I'" :1.1'[':.'. $3;!,65,09~' ":'I! ':/ $678;776, ,:,i',i"$1l;164;269:":,1 "',$2,~1 0,924':,1 II.- "". '.., .H,II'ltJlh.":.,.:,."~j;llil"'n........",.,.,tLi",,,,,,, '"'' ~"~''''''''''' .,,,H!.Jll,,,,,;.,,,<c,ll>d:'.,, .,."'.' ...."..,lwL"".,....,,,li<,~,;"';;.....~.,;,III~I,H,'" " .. ,,) .hi,',".__.' "";~,'""'",....,!i,,UI,4,,,,;,..."'M I ~"j,,;""";,,~Iij,;r, ',.., : "",41:,.. "".' ....,.111l11'~.... .. :"',A;;,! -108. f: .s~~,ME!{ IF;U~,~: . - - '. . , . . ,,' : J. .: '.' _ 'ii' '" - Alio.,j STAFFING SUMMARY - 414 e,!... ',~':,~;~~:~~';,Q:q:._~'] ~.. '1::r1 i""" "" "n 1""" '. """'",'" 'I' " '" . ." . ,2:00,'" t ... ____'"'" ,. ,... F:fIT;'l'):'~'~i~;:~""QQ,;;,',,n :~~,':' ';, :::3:':l~~:'Q.9':i, ',ill !j;'!!. l!;:~i;i.~.;'!:~'i:lt;},:! 9' Q'!:~ '! ',"i P''", ':'~.'7i~,Tr:-4~0' .--ro' T~ , ".lei' .!.,;" ."C.,,: i!:~:J!":~'!:!.j.;;1::'!3':.Q6":"lj <jJ;.:U!J;;;'U:E~fpQ,i',i:\:i '~:;-'''-'''''i'''' "-'. ., 'I Senior Maintenance Worker 14.00 f". ."",1400,'" ,~ l-_l~t~~)~ Associate Engineer Engineering Technician 1/11 Equipment Operator Maintenance Worker /111 Public Works Specialist Public Works Supervisor Senior Civil Engineer Senior Fiscal Office Specialist 2.00 2.00 3.00 18.00 100 4.00 1.00 100 -109. !_SEW,ER,~[)I;f ,f;ti~O ." ..::' ~ -. " "'"i' ,,:'.' _ 4'30; i r. "-: _' _ .. _, _ _ ~ 'i:I _ EXPENDITURES Other Expenses Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES FUND SUMMARY 117,880 755,579 106,156 $979,615 414,878 556,160 $971,038 144,697 1,000,083 121,731 $1,266,511 465,134 539,136 $1,004,270 171~;rrf22)91;7n:"'~:;:19;091':1, IfJk.;"..~~"_....,,,..,,,"....,.J,,,,,,,,,":";dJlH..l,^,,,,,jJl.'.,,_;;';" ,....,.0',....",. [,;l;~, -;;;'iio;i:Ei6"'il ~rr::~~!:256:o60;IJ :.,. _~"..J""...,.._."~,_.^,,,.^..~.,:.;t~l. ,,~.lL, ~......,I_"", .."..;.....;.""........ ~'''-.,_.'''..W''.".;..-'''IHt~ ..... .. ""'~'I'" "'(:"j"!'W""IH!W""- ';....'ffll'r'.. "':;1 (~~;J~JlliJQ0~~..,;g']lli}1~t1t,,:jF:!i::!~j1i $843,347 $369,091 fl~iF?r.::r";;:Fl~f";:'oTI'~ir;J!?jj~lz:t<ifnF~~O"';'~ 1" ....,., I ".." '" ... .." ." .,_ , .I_ ,I~ '" '. ." ,J "'." .,c. ,.. .. ., ~,"" .",i.ll.~. ....,,,JI<,,,, ,~i,I""".". ~,~.l..."".,...d ~~"."._,:iL"""", II". ,,"ilL: 22i5:290'll/E1'1.i!;:f20:o'66 III t.;,..........~....._.......w..:::J:_iJ1.i~.-'. $220,290 $120,000 r<f"'l-~""""'~"""""'--"-'-''''''if'lT,'~~~1'''0~''il~'lMr:'~~:''1!':1~~;;:'';''''~''''''''-rt\l"'~!""""-'I"''"7''''!m;-''i'l"r-r:l"r'i-'~'''''!1>~''''''''''~rr:)r:~-'rr''!''l!!"'''''r.<'''''1'1 iNETliFUND Ae<TIVITY""i'Ii:': ,:.,,',[-:, ,,:illl" .'I"!!, ,11'1".: ,i'lI!I, (~8,g7)1"I'($262,241)i:1 ' ',,1($6~3,957.) ":i'!i'0($~49,0,91) L,j~',~Iu;.llu">;,,~II~It,,. ....:i4li.I:~..,,,....lll,"',,.~jj,~J.,,).....,,.,ltEmM.'-:.u'~ .,."~....(~,,..lt~ I,.. ."",'.:.lI,~.,~":.u..~,......~....~,w,;[;,w,,~;.,.,.J,, ""~<~...l.-..,,,. ....4.,.1.:< ...,:....._~..,~....u..l.l,,,,.~"'I.J,~...._JJJu...,'-"_,Iil,,~,,,.....l<~._,j FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 431 Tel Cyn Sewer Basin Plan DIF 432 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DIF 433 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF 541 Tel Cyn Sewer Basin Plan DIF 543 Tel Cyn Sewer Pump Flows DIF 551 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DIF 553 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 431 Tel Cyn Sewer Basin Plan DIF 432 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DIF 433 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF 541 Tel Cyn Sewer Basin Plan DIF 543 Tel Cyn Sewer Pump Flows DIF 551 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DlF 553 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF TOTAL REVENUES o o o 13,291 45,17.1 751,742 169,411 $979,615 o o o 82,520 2,881 336,058 549,579 $971,038 60,073 39,828 1,166,610 o o o o $1,266,511 58,457 166,129 7.79,684 o o o o $1,004,270 ~qr;~~35:000:::!h;i'iil'il}!f~I'i~;35,:oomi~ 1(.",' ""~,~l.<,;,,,;~,,,,,,..... "." .".~,.'.'" Al,jL,;",,, ..!l"",~, ,,,",,,:,,,,,, !' ",.,.. '........i "'-""''','''""" ""Jr'"'' """"''''1 uaU.JtJ~~1'.:f,2.?.tY~'~;:'~.;~i:il.fullQ!Q.Q..Q.bf r"';T';~:T:1:,-"w2"~"~":'"'' '''~1'''':! ;-!":'tr:,T'l;~"" ,..'trh"""!1!, illh;;~Jj~jL..~~Q9 !1":jtj~dtiill.lld?~~;P~illlbt ~~~ " ~"~-'l'~~.ll"m""""", c-"~ W'~.::I'"......" "" ,"">1'-1'10.....1 '1'1' 'I'"" ',:IJ'j"""'I' "0 > 'iL!: "I:!::::;,' ',;,F"i:;!::J,!,' . t:::;k'" "!:--:':.,:! '1:1;. -;~' " "Jim""""",""". .,,,,,,,,,,,1.,,, ,,,~1. ""L" ", f"" -"...,' '::I"""" ---'f"'"'''' """""'0" "'''''1i''' '~I !~\i:~j;"', Ii # ;,*~"~ .jn;JIl 0 ~i, ;:i~:,:;;:JlJ!;1;;:J;I1ci'iiiJfl'j"';~;:O':1 ~1,.,w,,,,,,,,,_'<1il,.<IiW.,,1,~'l...........~ ,tl~""','d,fuiiOmi'f."""""u",,, r'~''-':'~~'"I'''''''1Irnrow'F'.'!'~''''';''' ":"I"~(h.-:::.:-!'mln:'';';::'11!llj~'nJ'' "'~:";'!'ilj!(;::h !llIP,j,'." 'I' 0 ".;,:,;; '11il "'~.:mlllH::Hiil"f:' 0:' k.;~;f~:ii..-Jt.Jilli~b...JJrl4illj, JwjwLdi:;!SD~,.; ~lfJq:;;Jr~y,II~JlMn,:1i76':71:'(!:~~I)Ii1-:.ii'~!111;1,,'!::('W,'ii:!.~,6'q ".......'"n.,I,.,"",.1.11 .",..n"~.~.,L,,"d,,U <1<,,,........,,. f;,,,,,,,,,',JII.,,,.,,,,,, $843,347 $369,091 $220,290 $120,000 ~NE':Y:F'iTN'D[Ac'rrVIT'y~j.;"'nj1nl~It;;~~~:Ji':;!~!;';i:'1PFiWi1i;~r;;ri;'!~($8T5nT:lJ:--i"~f$262~24'1T~'~,I~~f$6nT6'57')\::'rir"($249~'09'1'~ ....:!.;";"i;ikwl:;:::i,;l~l;"",;i:,~i./ll,,,...,;jl;.;l,,~,;.:.J"kJI~i"::.:I~i;"Jr;'h.;:;;.L.li;;;;:u..,j:::,:l;l1Jiml:"jit,,:4..L:7"."'M"'!..";~iL;~,,)LI~"I)..::", ,."....:;",."";,~i~;::::;,..,;~;,!::,;wL,,,.., .;: ;1;;;:';;;i,!"';',jw".""H::!:,i~;W:,, ,,,jl,,,;~"";;,,m,,lil:,:.,,J .110- r!";~,-V<':.,'" ,fr"'l',~: "~", ~ ..' ~ 11,,# ,J . ff''''ttl,_;:;I'f 1, ::i 6), ~ (':'tJ'f:nj.;I~'l:,~. ,. 'r, 'j,', :;if! PI!! d H ~, ,.,~, ,If I ' "'~,,,',<"" '.....,...,.. '<b!..-I' ...."Wi ," " H ,J ." .. ,., PROPOSED TRANS~T fUNDS BUDGET -111- TRANSIT FUND The Chula Vista Transit (CVT) is an independent municipal transit system with the Chula Vista City Council as its governing board. CVT forms part of the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), which is a network of local and regional transit operators. The MTS provides a seamless transit system composed of local, regional and ADA paratransit services. MTS coordinates fares, transfers, routes and information services to the region. Transit staff also works closely with the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) - the region's transit funding, planning and policy setting agency. REVENUES Chula Vista Transit operating funds come from a combination of State Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds (a Y. of 1 percent of the State Sales Taxes) and passenger fares, which are used for operations and for capital programming. Prior to July 2001, the City received a direct allocation of its TDA funds, but in 2001 regional transit funds were consolidated under the Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB), now the MTS. The funding consolidation allows the City to participate in available Federal Transit Administration (FTA) capital funds programs. The City has received significant capital project funding from MTS over the last few years, which has allowed Transit to purchase equipment, vehicles, and parts to -113- keep the transit system operational. These funds have also been used to make improvements to transit centers and bus stops in order to keep both our internal and external customers happy. Chula Vista Transit Revenues Revenue From Other Agencies 1 $ 315,330 $ 1,738,349 $ 1,423,019 451% Charges for Services $ 1,411,838 $ $ (1,411,838) -100% Other Revenue Total $ 1,727,168 $ 1,738,349 $ 11,181 1% Note 1. Beginning in FY 2009-10, funding received from TDA has been reclassified as Revenue From Other Agencies rather than Charges for Services Transit staff's goal is to maximize the effectiveness of transit funds while recognizing the revenue constraints facing the region. Since the funding consolidation, Transit staff actively participates in the SANDAG/MTS budget process. Along with the region's other Transit agencies, City Transit staff presents its proposed operating budgets. Various budget meetings are held and budgets are adjusted according to the available funds and SANDAG Board funding policies. EXPENSES CVT operations and capital programming contains no General Fund contribution. The CVT's operating and capital programming costs are funded by SANDAG Consolidated TDA Article 4.0 funds and Federal Transit Administration 5307 funds. All City Staff costs are reimbursed by the SANDAG funds. Other than personnel and staff time reimbursements, the majority of CVT's expenses are fleet maintenance costs, which includes fuel costs. Chula Vista Transit Expenditures Personnel Services $ 356,000 $ 356,365 $ 365 0% Supplies and Services $ 820,000 $ 802,895 $ (17,105) -2% Other Expenses $ 290,000 $ 282,738 $ (7,262) -3% Transfers Out $ 95,000 $ 92,321 $ (2,679) -3% Utilities $ 190,000 $ 204,030 $ 14,030 7% Total $ 1,751,000 $ 1,738,349 $ (12,651) -1% The fiscal year 2009-10 'budget includes funding' for 3.0 positions, which is the same as the previous year. Personnel services have been amended to reflect the elimination of the Cost of Living Adjustments. Overall, there is a net expenditure reduction of $12,651 to include reductions in Supplies and Services (reduced fieet maintenance charges related to fuel) and a $7,200 reduction in overhead charges partially offset by a $14,030 increase in Utilities based on rate increases. -114- STATISTICS Operated by City 01 Chula Vista by contract with private bus contractor Routes 6 Service Six local routes most within Chula Vista city limits, with some service in unincorporated areas 01 the County (Bonita). Square Miles Served 48 FY 2007-08 T olal 3,406,773 Passengers (37) buses (25) 40-loot, CNG New Flyers Fleet Size (1) 35-loot, Diesel Orion (3) 35-loot, Diesel Gillig (6) 30-loot CNG EI Dorado Nationals (2) 40-1001 Diesel New Flyers -115- I> t \) <~!J ,r.....~, k. uW! hi"". j' J' '''' "-1 h a .----..""... '\ /-----~~ \~ ,"'" . hJ -.... ',I., \f:.!J "." ~ 1 /'\.. . n.n \;,.11" t, ij ~V~'~;L.~"\ '> Ih~p \. ,,' It "~:, ll' ,:', .' v \ f 11" I ~ "\. \ 11~1 ~,.........,.;,. 1....-.... .........A ' i1 ' \ '\. 1.1~i ,!,.J' , i \, ./"' .\ } f 'i'._..)(...J 1'\ ~- \. 1"" , . ;1\, "r. >'. iIl',} '\!ilt \ ../ \ II"., ~1 \., .'1,' ,.'.., , "\...-JJ \....' ........~. .., _ ,~,~"",,-,-,,-'-'~S i1 't f ;' '\.1,,\ "J' 1 ' I~"/ pJ. ',. (~, \ I ,\ '~. 1'.' \ r ,. / :,\,. \ i$ . ,,' It, ; 't;!-~ _~J' ~~ ~'! i t'""'''';'' ,i?;~~r ~hl \:'""</';/;.Jy\ . il~~. \, ,~!, Ii rS\\ \s!t~\"')' t "I. "",," '.-'1 ., , . U . l \.. .J~"lm . J ~\ " \ll , t J' '\ /"" \)(jll ff~~ .' ,",(, \Y'~ \ ;ii , I.,'", j/' ,I .\." "7""\' \\ \ JI': I y" I ,-"'" '. "":<'-".', "', ,-,,, \".", f ~ \ _" J,,~- '\ ~ ~ \. .,,-;.~. i\'" \ ". j..,....\. \ i...--' "-'"'''''' :, 'H' ,..- .,....~"~ \ '. ..," -~" u~,..Ur/" ~ ,.;PI'''--~ \ ...,.r- "~I "h" '" ,..-- i ,,' ( ,., '\_-:' \ nI "El.~..\"""\ I] \ '! ;1 ,I \ ! J L3'.\" 1.'IIA/". "._'1' \' i \. \""jl~. ..\..t"V~'l\'.,' l~ '\ ~r', ...,.,.... .,11 ,~'; t1-....---..{ " , J' !!; ~\\<~'.,. ~ ,......,.. .Wi . \\n~ "\ \ ,.,..'':-tr \ ~'1\ ~..:-,- I o.,'\ \/. \ .)\ ..:. ~lhEl l \-"'1 'Jb \-,\ ,,il " ! , """'" ... r " ~~ \ ur:>-' ","'.WiI, >, \.-.:."..- !.i.1 ~ . \ ~-:;;;.-"'-'i ,,,":;i(,r~,,\ H 't,>,;l'( "... . .....~~.~:~~~:j-_4:~__.J 'I .}; .,.......- I \ .,"5_~" .. IJ_' --- ~;'" _~...." li ...-~-:." _---~...... ;~,.......-_~.,.J! /:.... ,;;::;;;;:-..' \ ,'y/~'" : I'.r t,-~, \ !."""o"' J~~ t . [ I Il ,);" ", f"" lo,; " I n;....~ -;~-h13 ,"'. ~t~Jt I 1:".\ <,/ f' \ ~{ j,1-'''t It!! . 1-" f " t ,. '., '~..':'\' ~I ~. ~"" ~,l~,\ 1"il:{iIH'.lJ!;'f,.::t~C"W""'i'I" H ~I'. ,,\ Ilhlll1d,,', ,Il' , 611 .. l - ~ .. , ' j Jl 'Ivl ii! \",1" ",,1~ I, J!,'\ J "~q...,. (:,'iiJ1 "'Y J lh,\ !!, 'I, E t;El H B~ 5 """ ~" " ~~ ~e ~t: (~ ~ ~~j 0'- ~ .... ell ... i;3 'il" "'!!.: ~\J ~o I.;.~ G.. " (, ~F, ". _I:..: ~o-::! ..;.;!;.r .:. ~.:. ~~ a ~l~ "go "ga ;,~" "., J"~~' :"0::; ~l:& ~"''' l..lt;~'" ",e:.. 2a'~ i5~ 2S~ ~~~B ~~n I I ~ U ~ M H <: ~ M M ~ ~ i f ~ i~ f I t ',j lIt:, ! j , ,\ ~ 1; II 0 C o B ~.' a" II :'.:! t ... ~ z :r.a~..=-~!;~=~::::" l..U ~~:.1::~j~aa~;;,,':5:; ~ ~?,.L! ~L~~ ~ldL~~ ~ ~ ( ),~ f' ,,.....-' '. G m l!) .. " E3 ~ .. "0 tI 'J ~. ~\ ;~~ ~ .;j T( "d o ~ltfJ \A , .,.~,............... , , \ '\ " \ , \ , 1\ \\ l~..<.. 'j ) / I 1i< uJJ , l!I ~J ,,,.....,., ..," .'$( t '" ''''''I'--.'N;~;'' I ; >"","'~ 1"..-"""'" " ''--'to:', 1.1 ~~" -. ,. .116- ", , ;; l'R~NSI:T 'F~~,l? 1, " " "", . c, ", '~, '~400' FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Utilities Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Revenue from Other Agencies Charges for Services Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o 5,549,320 1,544,852 o 192,939 22,618 147,140 $7,456,869 167,735 3,677,603 2,433,007 131,967 $6,410,312 359,907 6,697,707 1,081,589 2,999 174,373 13,410 82,913 $8,412,898 184,751 5,378,518 1,660,821 316,059 $7,540,149 r"''l''p; 3 56' Oo'O:'I~":1,7:;!'i3561'36'5"! i;~b.I!"L;)J;,....."""" ",.".."",, :ld~;;:;;;.ilJ:::';,;.!,;"".",;. '.."... ,'~:n 'i,,'if':', ;'826'0061'1 ':i,/',";'S02:1EJ5 T L"L.:."......,....,~ ......J.,'-"-=, ,__....J w'; .."t.':'.,T........," "',' 'W_,' "prp""'.!iil!"l.,,""'H'" V"'~'''''''';'i1 0~1BtW:;,,?~~,Q,;.QQQ,~HL:jib1Ui]f2:.?1;;j~,3~J!~ f0!~(;;;i':,,'n,W]illr~,i;;rojlJ~i~;:;'~~!ffiW]:;H~ifo:';~ ,...,j,:J,L, ...".t;iL",.,.llll\;, ..,n.,W .... ._..~,(.",.",,.I;~,w...~jrlld.,,l, """-"---,"'-g-"'" .._'--'--~ 90,g,Qq}:iI,~:':I~I,r::i:g9.4:g,,3.0 '!I T'~""T""rljW'.:':rfl!r"';';j;IW"W';""""",::, .:oqQ.j;!ibL:;~dU~1tl:.~~1:~;~j "..,..,.", '''"'''''-''''I''''--''l~ "",'," '''~'''' "'IF," .., ,. ".",1,,"."" ''''''''''111:'''0''.'' ...;;.......,',.,.;;,.:..," ''''>!,," 'OJ' ",j".."'i'lll.,....',',,,i.. 'U .',.."'1'...'.',...,,'.',....'('... ." I-..:S~~'~ll.:i~.-i... ..iWb..;":":~':"Il' '),JlLiL::;" $1,751,000 $1,738,349 P','.l''l''''''"",,,'tl 10iJ"~ ,'" '1"~;:'11~0'';;1 ..i;.., "H.':" I"'; '.,~',,", I! I;,..)!. '.' ~i ,{. . ) ii,:<i~1!I'!;,1 I'!l .....Jb"~.",t,'I"'!;';,;;;;.,,,.,,,,.,',.,...,ho.,,~,(ii,,..:;:;""",.,.,.".,JL",,,,,\ J;,Jl1;rE;W3'15':330 ';,~I':i;::n(~ '; 7:i'S::i49WI ,"','l1lo..~..,.!h:::fu<j." _,~,~,...,JJlf.. '~lt;;""'->..,...,...,.., ".....,..,..... ""1t!"."'C""'""""""';"""~'"'''' """';;""""'I"';'.'("m"~'l.l'!H"".'J" ' ~ ,,"',j. 411,838' ',,'," .II",'mll'II'" ,'t "'0 ~1.1~LIl~!...d.~!-.;. ' ,'I 6;;j~~~a.UJ!ili1JI~ r'r:H;"I':77,,:,W';t"":;::'1~:r;~'0'-TY'. . !lN~"'lfTlm;c;W:'I"O~0m ;;rl,lil";";""'rlfo";"'-'i'IWi'; ,1'I':<';;l]II:,...,,)-'.-I,II'-'.,>.J;;'IlI111;:r L';;:::':'.:..jiliS;u'l;;i:;!;il...lm;""" ;;j);;.'~";.,;,:,U;;,;Ji.oid.ii;;i.(iLlli.:.,,..;;J $1,727,168 $1,738,349 fN'E1i~wmNBrAcfi\liT~fim~~irll~]I,~r~i:ft~I!~r:Nr~imrJ;:~!il;;'~($1'1>>46' 557));r.I:Jli':i:'-!($8721;74'9j:l'nl~li:II';;;i($'2S832)1;~:inll\i:!:>'!W"Hi:1W.;n'$o:!!1 !(,.;i)~~"!ii';iiJ!ln:;:"";";(l~L,,h;lliJ.Ii,;;';:;';;mlJiij;;,;;!l;;;!;;;"'::ii1d;;;::ifrlllili;!i:ii~~-,!i;:;";:JdJ.iiit;;;d!.I!:-",~.h~.~,".;c..Ju}.;:,...:"'ilLii:i1;,.iillL;'"Wi;;;;';;"iutl(J...;.."u;,jiL'S:j;~~JU;i:;i;,"""i,';j""'~'UH1L,-\i,,JJ!iiI,::it;;ffil;,..:;dAIU;'LiWl.",;;;,ii FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 401 Bayfront Trolley Station TDA 402 Transit CVT 403 Transit Capital Projects TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 401 Bayfront Trolley Station TDA 402 Transit CVT 403 Transit Capital Projects TOTAL REVENUES 103,691 7,169,095 184,083 $7,456,869 103,692 6,287,608 19,012 $6,410,312 98,406 8,218,169 96,323 $8,412,898 98,405 7,428,089 13,655 $7,540,149 """11'1""..."'...."'........"~"'''.w'''njl.'....'''lr'';.',...,"'wo",....,.""."......J 1diL!:.\.ci:l,Q8,QOO 'u:,;;,Pslid:!.91,!!12.." r:m''''''.,'._'~.'''.'''''t-~,.~'-::''~I'.,.'.,.';n:-'''.'.''....---:.,~.,_. "'''1 ~i:J!~2~~12illQQJ~jJjjill1~r;.8~,,~:;.~;Jr 1"",,,.,.,.,,...""-_. .~""~'=".,...,"-'~~ \;f!!': "";;..':~:';;'hlln;~1l":i.",. 0 ':~l ~l'!:'~~i! "IWr~'-;i ':1:::1;:':1;; "'; 0::,' '."i'jltJ"."....,,~"',... ...I~!i~; --... ",. r;;",-,>..,JL " q,dlo.<<. .,... ~ll.,-;;...", $1,751,000 $1,738,349 ':1e!:" "'1'0."2'''6':7:9']1'' "~'"'.''''<''0''26''7'9;1'1 lii'ai,,:i' ,', .' ;1 GWj!"I'!~ai:/jf' . .'; . .' ~~~~~].24lt4891f1l!!iirr,rri~l~1~6~~~E70:i!;.!, ".:J1JjL"....,..._,......., ,,,.,__,,...i.Jlt8,""~.,,......,,',...,... .<_..........., "'J!'~11,;I'lf!.ll"ll'l:'~Hii~:'!,\~0-~f. ~M;'I'i':'fJ:I~t!""","\1r,,"1!I'!~:"0..f1;\; "","<-"''''''[''''''';''.;'' ',. ./.,........1....,..'". C""',-".' ." ."":,...,"'"""liljh.-.,,,.,.,~Ll..,<<.lt ........"IL"....,,,,t! ~""...'" 1",,,,(,, $1,727,168 $1,738,349 rNE'T:'FQ'N'D,;"Ac'1i!'vTT.x;;;~jF;~,:',;,:JIt'j~~F~:ilgWF,:n:::,1'~'ii.,#,l;'j1i~;?jlii^($'r;O~'6';5~7') jk;'r~?I;;.'('$~8'?;2:'~4~:r)i-:l;;f!/~!~~':'('$2,~:;'ir3'~)":1i~';:',?':~':'~I~I,!g!~i!~l'd:!~ "',~, ,1_m,;;"mU1;I""..~;J"""''''JJ.,.,U,jl,;U..ll"",',,,,,I,,,,,.,!J;:;;,...!.ilif!.Q;.d "i<"jll>4..,',..~.:.lt...",!.lL,~",..,,_.~ >.I..t.."'......" "'...jl.;J1>~...j...<lI"...""_"~, ,~;_~.-,'" """,.I",,,,,--,,,,,,.,,,,,,,~,",,,,'.h....",,, .,...,~rIAlm"".I...."".....J",l,,---,...,,>-.... ,117, , :iTRA~SI:t n)ND ';' ,.,~,." ,1, n " '. '. :,40P I . - -" - --"- ". - - . -. - . .~... J STAFFING SUMMARY - 401 Administrative Technician Assistant Transit Coordinator Transit Coordinator Transit Manager Transit Operations Coordinator . . . -118- ,', ~<~ t";~ r " I., " ........"'.../j, , '''''r:H! ,..", l' '", tli~r""'",!I'~ 7: J~'; ';it" 'i,l Fi ~'Uj l.j~ j'ii~.I' m',;\~ ~ir ,_,It\ ........~ ,d '\',.Jtc' '. "Mv.r_ PROPOSED FLEET fUND BUDGET .119. FLEET FUND The Fleet Fund is an internal service fund which like other internal service funds is used to finance and account for goods, special activities, and services performed by one City department for other City departments on a cost reimbursement basis. The Fleet Management fund consists of two functions, Central Garage Operations, and Equipment Replacement. Funds are collected on an annual basis through each affected department's operating budget and deposited in the Fleet Management Fund. The Central Garage Operations function maintains the City's fleet of vehicles, both through City equipment mechanics and through contracts with local vendors for more specialized maintenance work, such as major transmission and air conditioning repairs. All City vehicles are maintained by the Central Garage, including those associated with safety services, streets and sewers, parks and open space, and the library. Services provided include maintenance of the vehicles, vehicle fuel, and other specialized services not directly related to any single vehicle. REVENUES Revenues in the fleet fund come directly from affected departments within the City There are two types of charges billed to City departments: 1. Vehicle Maintenance Charges: .These charges are based on the actual vehicles that reside within a department and include costs ranging from routine (oil changes, preventive maintenance) to major (transmission repair) as well as fuel costs. 2. Vehicle Replacement Charges: The Fleet fund charges each department replacement costs based on the average annual cost to replace each vehicle over the vehicles useful life. Most non-safety vehicles have a useful life from seven to ten years. For fiscal year 2009-10, there -121- are no vehicle replacement charges included in the General fund due to the economic constraints the City is facing. Vehicle replacement for fiscal year 2009-10 will be limited to police vehicles and funded through grants and other funds. Fleet Fund Revenues Use of Money & Property Other Revenue Total $ $ 3,491,958 $ 3,491,958 $ 50,000 $ 3,480,978 $ 3,530,978 $ 50,000 $ $ 3,937,770 $ $ 3,987,770 $ 456,792 456,792 0% 13% 13% For fiscal year 2009-10, Other Revenue has increased by $456,770. This is due to increased fleet maintenance charges allocated to citywide departments and the Transit fund. EXPENDITURES The Fleet fund's expenditures include costs to repair and replace equipment (motor vehicles, mowers, generators, equipment trailers, etc.) throughout the City. As mentioned in the revenue section above, these costs are then allocated back to the affected departments based on several factors such as the number of vehicles/equipment, repair history, and fuel usage. Fleet Fund Expenditures Personnel Services 1,045,708 858,597 $ 910,174 $ 51,577 6% Supplies and Services 3,327,178 2,948,621 $ 3,140,554 $ 191,933 7% Other Expenses 500 $ 900 $ 400 80% Capital 76,606 396,543 $ 172,200 $ (224,343) -57% Utilities 1,139 1,219 $ 1,800 $ 581 48% Transfers Out 38,228 $ $ 0% Total 4,488,859 4,205,480 $ 4,225,628 $ 20,148 0% The fiscal year 2009-10 budget for the Fleet Management functions is $4.2 million. This amount is in line with the 2008-09 fiscal year projections. However, it should be noted that the 2008-09 budget is projecting a savings of approximately $1.2 million from its $5.4 million budget. These savings were achieved mainly due to delaying the purchase of replacement vehicles and equipment ($830k) and savings that the City realized in budgeted fuel costs ($360k). The City will once again delay vehicle replacements with the exception of several Police vehicles, which will be funded with grant money or alternative funding. This will result in capital savings of approximately $224k offset by higher anticipated fuel costs in the Supplies and Services category. It is important to note that the -122- longer vehicles are kept in service, the more service and repairs that will be required to keep these vehicles running; thereby increasing maintenance costs. Over the past several years, fuel costs have been difficult to budget for due to its price volatility. The following chart illustrates recent fuel cost incurred by the City, as compared with average fuel costs throughout the State of California. As shown below, the City has seen a near doubling of fuel costs between fiscal year 2002-03 ($1.07 million) and fiscal year 2008-09 ($2.05 million) with a peak of $2.43 million in fiscal year 2007-08. Although average fuel prices decreased in fiscal year 2008-09, they are expected to increase during fiscal year 2009-10. Citywide Fuel Costs and CA Avg Gas Price / Gal $3.00 $4.00 " C C $3.50 oS! ~ $250 ._----~- rn '" ~ $3.00 - $2.00 ~ u $2.50 'C " "- ~ 0; " $1.50 :$2.43 ..", $2.32 $200 " '0 "- c .96" '$2.15' '" ~ . . $2.05 $1.50 > Q. $100 $1 .. x .~ w :-${,28 0; $1.00 c " $0.50 t..._, g "- '. $0.50 rn , u $- $- FY03 FY04 FYOS FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY 10 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Estim ate Budget c:J City Fuel Costs ~CA Avg $/Gallon In 1985, the City Council authorized theestablishment of a vehicle replacement policy and fund to provide for the planned replacement of the City's vehicular equipment (Resolution 1985-11984). Funds for replacement are collected annually from each affected department; with dollar amounts determined by the vehicle's estimated "life" and estimated replacement cost. Due to budget constraints, the City will not be replacing any vehicles out of the Fleet Management fund in fiscal year 2009-10. The City has a fleet of approximately 610 vehicles that are maintained by Central Garage staff with an estimated replacement value of $29 million. Of these vehicles, 77 are owned by the Sewer Enterprise Fund, with an estimated replacement value of $4.1 million. All equipment maintenance and replacement costs associated with these vehicles are budgeted directly in the Sewer Enterprise fund. -123- Am \'.... "". Ii "" '! ~,:," ~'i\; .... .'J~ ;~~" W .'/~, ~lt""'L., ". ,;t!,.>" """ """ '''""''''',"-~,,~''''''w'''''.'''' /.;'llJ.I>'~';""~;~''''. .........;.._.~ Clnt L. ~,' \' ,Ill'" ! 'I.! ."y ";::'" I ,:''1\\ .' ,","" rA'~ "),"'J'. -124- " - "-" . . . I .A;:.lEE~,~AIN>>:GEMIiNI_., 'c" '.. .' , < __ __ ~_1~9).1 FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Utilities Transfers Out TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 1,234,824 3,042,400 1,103,375 549,686 6,574 42,418 $5,979,277 97,740 5,125,897 $5,223,637 !~:r:i1Q7'8-58'~,'5~9?:~' ;:J:~GE:,::t'9T6-',.,174-:-:: 1,045,708 '"""_"""_.,...",. ,,,,,,.,.,t.'l',,.,,,~ ''."._.''',j 3,327, 178 cl.'t..~~21K$..2.lJ~L;J.!).40!'554'W 1 015 242 !s:f;::;'?;I~~/Jf~5(rd1:1i(1~riWT~~Fil[11r9~6'ory~ ' , :"'14." "d"II,.,,,,....,,., ,~" ...:,al"",,,,,,,,,, , "j", 76,606 w' ':' . 'j: ;:'396,'543;1l,r::;:; ~~;~T72:i6(j';-j L_..i<;.iU;,.--,.~..~ ,,",'M,,...;;..J..ILi,~,.,ul;;w!L,,....,......_....,,,,,....J1 1 '139 :'"~,,, '2"-1"9"J~~c '-'IiII''' '1T8"0"0" 'fill 'J:,"'!';' . ~"".~",j,;' J",jL);Lili;','I;&!ii...;_~~ 38,228 ,,1~iI[o]ir:i"']',;1l?ill~!i,:'Q] $5,504,101 $4,205,480 $4,225,627 92,548 4,614,499 $4,707,047 ,-.I....''''..'''.~.m....._..;.,..."..,,..''''"i:)j..,.l'''..''"''.''''"...._.....~r~'" '''2;]1'' ;: }~ii<,j!::;",50 ;'000,;;,1 iiiiHH:Liuii,q50; 000 .i~ .",......_..~....,..___..,.."'..",,:J ,"""..u;.J;J."'"..........."" I'r .' i' 3"'4809i8'TI',,'JD'::-j':"g:inio1r,t ti..,db;; .'.h".""",.', "..,~,,'" ,,!i ,iit;:;.;:i!:",~!:;;.",.,~!.;",:; ,d, ",J21 $3,530,978 $3,987,770 1""',",:nT"','.f'F~''''U'''':''N'''''D'H!i'A''''WC''~:''''''''''V'."\I"T' "v::::.r;lm!;:);;~;;;qjr';;UpilijJr!"::;;;ll.!r11:;_;7j~HQFj::';C("$""7""5' -<<5''''~~6''''4:'-0'''')'1,!~.:!.j,ii~n!-'''('$''''7-'::'9''''71'''!:On'5''''4r''M)''l).'';;,~'"F'j;''('''$~'t'!l6' '~"~'5'.0''''2'''')''Stlflri;Hr'(''$'''l'''',;''3'''''7'''r.8'"5""7""")'1 .NE,l'"" ..,," ,J..! ,',;Int i.l'1i'Jt';;'N<"~114:,..'t'W"lh"'+11l:e1!"!:;;, ",' ".:IV \~..: ,'.. ",.. ''''(!.!I''' ,..7~, .~, ~~':,."'.'ll''' ?,__" __ ' 1.jjj,1'<!li..-ll..11I"~'I_"...,l'...:...:I.:.J.i'HlhJic...'w~~.;d;~jfi",..,jj;.jd",,, ._U";;..,.,:liDt,::m:...:......,..,,'''''"'''';;.J,,........,~.......,...,_''~;t_'L,,'',,~L~jJ.;._.;jL,~"""'""l<lIH,,~,,"'~~~..,,mJ,,'...l~.~_ -125- - - -.~ - . .'FtEEJ MANAf;:EMEN,riFt:JNID . .:. 390,1 . ~ ----- - -..... ~ . ~.-..4_ < _ ~ -k ~. ~ _ _ _ _ _ J. STAFFING SUMMARY - 391 Equipment Maintenance Manager Equipment Mechanic Fire Apparatus Mechanic Fiscal Office Specialist Fleet Manager Mechanic Assistant Senior Equipment Mechanic , .. -126- ", 1~1 ( , ,- ".' , ~m, ~., a .Ii , ."",,,. '"".'" ('"nTH '0.-. . ..... - ]1. /<-J I' .'~">, llr:.'.-;m'..... ..)~., .,,"''''~ o. .,1 I .... I" ""W;,;,'''!)i!.rlr:,:;:;!i~il';'!'';'''''!I'Ill; '1'''f'lf,,,.1 """" 1t:.,."".Il:l..~.ij)j~j..>.l<~:j',., l:l"'irJ'""t ~I ,.; "I' :j ~". ,- I:). d't" "";,'-'w""~. ~~.>>...-If;.",,-~At;.. ,~q' j. l.!. {i'llit !,\ J "', '''h;."..ti'll,,-<I,,~-If:. 'ilf ,'1;\ "<I ,,<.II 'H ,!'" ";"""'11,'.;;.."';1,..."""'" 'I",.",.r.l, ~~,.. ii",.';' q, L ,J l;' ,,:' PROPOSED BUDGET CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS .127. CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Capital Projects Funds account for resources used for the acquisition and construction of capital facilities by the City, with the exception of those assets financed by proprietary funds. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS These funds were established as depositories for monies received from issuance of bonds for various assessment districts. The monies are used to finance the construction of public works improvements in the related districts. Included in this group are funds 501 through 518. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT fEES These funds were established as depositories for various development impact fees. The fees are levied against all new development in the City in order to pay for the construction or improvement of public facilities as a result of City growth. Included in this group are the following funds: Funds 542 - Teleqraph Canyon Drainaqe Development Impact Fee This fee is levied against new development in specific areas of the City, based upon the drainage facility their project will generate an impact on. The monies collected are used to fund construction of public improvements designed to increase the capacity of the subject facilities, allowing the City to maintain service levels with increased demand. Funds 567-582 - Public Facilities Development Impact Fees The Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF) is levied against new development throughout the City to mitigate the impacts of growth on the City's public services. The monies collected are used in the construction of new, and renovation of existing, public facilities. -129- Fund 587 - Otay Ranch Pedestrian Bridqe DIF The Otay Ranch Pedestrian Bridge DIF is levied against all new development in Otay Ranch Villages 1, 2, 5, and 6 to fund the construction of pedestrian bridge improvements, as necessitated by growth in these villages. Fund 588 - Otay Ranch Villaqe 11 Pedestrian Bridqe DIF The Otay Ranch Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF is levied against all new development in Otay Ranch Village 11 to fund the construction of pedestrian bridge improvements, as necessitated by growth in this village Fund 591 - Transportation Development Impact Fee The Transportation Development Impact Fee (TO IF) is levied against all new development in the City east of 1-805 to fund the construction of transportation improvements, as necessitated by growth in the eastern portion of the City. Fund 593 - Western Transportation Development Impact Fee The Western Transportation Development Impact Fee (W-TDIF) is levied against all new development in the City west of 1-805 to fund the construction of transportation improvements, as necessitated by growth in the western portion of the City. OTHER TRANSPORTATION FUNDS Included as a part of this group are the following: Fund 723 -Bicycle Facilities This fund is a depository for local Transportation Development Act funds, Article 3.0, received from the County for the purpose of bicycle related programs. Fund 735 - Transportation Partnership This fund is a depository for the revenues received from the State and Local Transportation Partnership Program. Funds must be spent on street purposes. Fund 736 - Other Transportation Proqrams This fund accounts for other miscellaneous Federal and State transportation grants received by the City. -130- Fund 737 - Transportation Equity Act 21 This fund is a depository for revenues received from the federal government under the Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century. Funds must be spent on street purposes. Fund 739 - Traffic Conqestion Relief This fund is a depository for revenues allocated to the City under Streets and Highways Code Section 2182 and Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7104. Funds must be expended for maintenance or reconstruction of public streets and roads no later than the end of the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the allocation is received. Any funds not expended within that period must be returned to the State Controller Fund 741 - Proposition 18 Hiqhway Safetv This fund is a depository for revenues received from the State government under Proposition 18 (The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Act), as approved by voters in the November 2006 general election. Funds must be spent on street purposes. MISCELLANEOUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDS Included as part of this group are the following: Funds 713 and 714 - Capital Improvement Proiect Funds The Capital Improvement Funds were established to set aside monies for capital improvement projects. These funds do not generate revenues from any source except by transfer from other funds and interest earned on monies in the funds Monies transferred to the funds are expended for budgeted capital improvement projects and monies remaining after completion of a project are transferred back to the fund from which the project was originally financed. Fund 715 - Park Acquisition and Development This fund is a depository for fees collected from subdividers for the purpose of providing park and recreational facilities directly benefiting and serving the residents of the regulated subdivision. These funds are collected pursuant to Chapter 17.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, in accordance with authority granted by Section 66477 of the California Government Code. -131- Fund 717 - Residential Construction Tax This fund is a depository for fees levied for the construction, replacement, or conversion of all dwelling units within the City including hotels and motels, collected pursuant to Chapter 3.32 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Fund 725 - Industrial Development Authoritv This fund was established to account for staff costs in assisting in the issuance of industrial development bonds. A fee of 1/8th of 1 % is charged to reimburse costs incurred. -132- ASSESS DIST:lMpROVEM'ENTS 'F.,UNo. .- . ,S:()(). i ~'J - -' -.. . '- "-~ - ~_ ~ _ "';:_-.-. ._ _- ~ ~_.' .. __ ___'.l _' "__ ___ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Transfers Out TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o 8,937 $8,937 16,420 8,937 $25,357 $16,000 $67,534 95,694 2 54,165 $149,861 103,734 o 28,874 $132,608 $28,472 $28,472 ....'w"""''''''..,....'''.''j'~''''!'...."...,.'''.,.....It'".''''..''~'''~'''a:':)'n..I'~""1I'"!'.1\~.'.'..~..,.,.",...l'."'lf!f':.':'~.,~,...,,-"""""W''''....,.t~'?.:1r,,,...~..,""'~.'<Ij.":"',",' ..t!:..:~"_."'"!"'-:~..,~".~'..~~r'~.'~...'_,~.~".,',.~",t:n",':.' 'NEli'EUNDIAcTIVIT:'lIri,:J,i ,,,11':II'I,r,,:,'i":-;I: ;'li'<'I':~ ,,'1"I"i' ;' ;,1' $140,9241 A;:,I,?': $'107'251 il'lb'l',i, IJI;:' $'12;472 i,;",r:li, /,,($39:062)~ ' ,.,.,,1, c."'," ,....;. '''...'....T.y '. .......' .,c." .,.......".'.."'l, '. '" ,...,'," '........ '."'.. ",m'., ,," ..,..,... .,,,,.,) ,.."',,, """C' "" ,.",.,),!.....,.. . .....,.. "...,..,,,.,,11, '''.', H,...". . .." .... "".r! 1~'.,,;A.I't, .. d~n".""IU"'.",,,Il..,,..... ..."",. ."m,~, ,',!iJlk .. ..., !;J.... ,;,:,I~"~,,i.(l,~. ..,,,1 ,,~. ",j ;L"",Jlilli ...,. ."~w,..",u......"..,,~,,. "'''llti,.,.",. 1.<.". ., ,,,W,,,,,..,IllLnw.j ,"'.' ",,".~. ".I",JL~.,~,~".",,,,..,,,,,, ,.,.l.!;."..dll~..". ',IIU""",lIlj,,, ..... FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 501 Otay Lakes Rd AD 88-2 Improv 503 East H St AD 87-1 Improv 507 Otay Valley Rd AD 90-2 Improv 511 Otay Vly Rd Fee Recovery Dist 512 EL Greens II AD 94-1 Improv 515 Twin Oaks Ave AD 96-1 Improv 516 Oxford St AD 97-1 Improv 517 AD2004-1 Dixon Drive 518 AD2005-1 Tobias Drive TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 501 Otay Lakes Rd AD 88-2 Improv 503 East H St AD 87-1 Improv 507 Otay Valley Rd AD 90-2 Improv 511 Otay Vly Rd Fee Recovery Dist 512 EL Greens II AD 94-1lmprov . 515 Twin Oaks Ave AD 96-1 Improv 516 Oxford St AD 97-1 Improv 517 AD2004-1 Dixon Drive 518 AD2005-1 Tobias Drive TOTAL REVENUES 0 0 0 0 0 7,254 0 0 0 9,166 6,894 6,894 2,043 2,043 0 0 0 0 $8,937 $25,357 0 0 0 0 4,290 4,473 38,407 40,761 47,373 50,684 6,213 8,554 2,280 2,718 12,489 13,815 38,809 11,603 $149,861 $132,608 .133- $16,000 $67,534 6n_~m"~"3n"''''''''''''1''-I'''I'~''~'''''mll~''''''''''~''''~'~'''~ i;C:''i!]':;c;ij, ...;)!.;j11\!;,: 0 lbc:r:'n';"ip"rJI ",:'!'!xO;':', ,.LJ!!L:tmm.LILlillliJl'~_J...lii!H;Wi:Aill:dilil ' LX1J.....,.:;w f'..~'.~..- ,..."....I,...,."."~.. ... '-''rfl "~r ~""""'I.,,,,.....,,l'''''''r<''':;r "-] il'!/ df:";;,;!111!':':'!ij :1>;"'0' "I ;;'if ;kJ"iI1h,li'.,IIi,'!:,jl 0'< . L')t:li;;-:.';;L;IlJ::::;;IJiUiii...:i,~;,;;!;~JiJu::J;;;;jJju.;;j,il!L'N~.. t~ql;il~0r~:!![EO]1!mICi~IJ'mF.illl]mrii~ lfk..""l"'('"",I[',"';."'I,IL.,''','I",!.",!ftlJ",...",,lh"",!!!"",,,',,,I,,,,,,,,I< .'l ',n """': "'('I Ii ~",,,,'"k,",r'''T';;''~''~''' ...~.r~' :'!""~~f':":::~lfl:' ::''1"'"' .". "~.:~.:'" ~'.~ll,r .,~' f.i u~, 6; 34 71 ~If.j 1,' :~'1'1::',,!:,.:J,\6; 34 ?;~iP -,~.'-,........_.,_.,"_~._,_..i;.""'-oll....4......... _.....'...."M_..,j'/ I'" .""" .....'f. Y. . ..,.. "1'.'" 'l"jL" .,...., ,_. '1 ';;!;;:~',Ji.t'i~?;~.~.\2,: O~31,:il ',? 1.1',,'iri1i :',/'h2;043/ !I<;.i,~~"........-.......,.....J.:.l",~ ...___"-.........til "'''''J:-''.' .11"1.0"0"7.0. -: J:J":IiC'. "",r,:.-1."0"6t0. 'c) 1i..',~J~L:i !~;-,-,,,.:.,,.Jit0.J.';J:iti.L!:L:j. _",!__L';,;J] p''''''';-,rT6'012"'1'.-,i~!..." "'ji".'W01 i'" E!0:J.:!L-u;..1:Jl!L...!......,-,,_ki:j. 1Di':':;j <liL."_'~.........,,.,j $28,472 $28,472 . ASSESS DISTr IMPR'OVEMENTS"FlJNfJ" , ," 50'0': -' .~- ..... - -::: ~- -~ -' '" "--,,,--.....-r ~ ,_. _ __ -=-_ _ ~ w _I _ '. _I r:-::--..m<-~..mr-~"'-';,-..r<":,#?ij!iir::r;;;?;,~'T,~;'~'l~I'II' ;J0'~'~'!~;I:rt~:TI'-$'1' ~-_. '-"''''~~,-.:'~' .:n::-$ 1".-....";..."""""'7r;;i-;"i7"'t:$' ~";J-...,.-;.7::.:::;;..,.........,'~;lID..,.~ NET,E1.UND A~,TIVIT,Y, ,m',""'", "", "1'" '",i" 'I" ,>"" -' , 40,924 ",I' .'" 07,251, ,,,I,, '" g~i'21 ' <,,($39,062)1 L:....;;,I. M,,,...,j,,J....,!!.,,..,,,J....,,,,. .......... -"..IIW"-."",,,,,. "'''''',""", ,........'".. ,...<~"~,L",J,__,""~.,..,,_.,,,,~..."_..,,.,_ ,- ;_~~.,.~, ~,.".~ ~...",.."l.,; ,~; ,A..._,_"~,,,,,,~__,.Jlli..~, ....,~,,<i~,.~'"'.. ,:.~",,,U___.":".,,,.,,,,,~,,_, >~.<l~'; .it -134- ;: T~L.EGR~Plill,~AN~ON,;DRAIN'AG~ -r)I'F'I~l!.J'fNi[j, .f 5'42 ' - ~ - ~ - ~ - - - " ~ _" _ _ .J FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 1,731 14,375 $16,106 1,027 28,590 $29,617 !"...'9.....,1""". ..".-. 111.... "'11'-' .",.." ...", , dt'l~:'~,~~llSlliill1;iL2gli;j:'22E.'jttlh~ifi1illi~JF~~ig!!~ c:'~'m~n-~"'~"--ij ,:., }i"<l'!;r." ""'1"'1'01');-'-1250000' ',,'. :!t,'\>,~ l;i:kd:,.': ',: .:<,!,.j ",\". '," " "., ,,',I "H~,m,~,~',"I... ..,'""...',." ..""',~",', ",,;U k<"",,"'.'~'~nn"',""~"m'~; $69 $1,250,000 259,977 537 $260,514 278,120 o $278,120 $0 $0 F<""'.'!::'f""""''''''''''''?I-''''''''''''''''-''''''''''''''~',';t'i1'''''~'r~rtMl'~;~''';:7,,''.''''m.!~~:'t~~m""'7'--~"""""-r""..,.,,,-.,,--"""""1"-'!t"j:;""'(';'rr.-~~"""'''''''''''''''~''''I''~-'''"':"Tt"'.."...,'l'!,......"""~ ;NElj,FUt:JD,ACl:IVIIy,:j.1'I:' :;:.-",1:..,,1::";; ;, ,:< "11';:;'.:;1,1.';'111 $24f1;4081,.:",j'.;:'I:,;,$?48,503 1,.':."1,,,,;" ;'" ($69);: 'Ii' '($1',250,000) <,'"""Jjl".,I','llllll,;;,,,;,,;;',,,'I,,,,,,,(;,:,th^L,;'..'..'ml!.j'"",;!iL"..;";.!;llr"",;..,Jn,,..........,....:"I,II,',..,.,.,If1,,,.,,..,.,";,,~",......,"'~,,dj"';jl;!jl,."..""',Ul"~.........."!.....I'I,',,,,,'1,'i......,,iffi~,,,.......;..,1,ljjijt,'";~tul"....;.."'j,.....;..;..;,,.Jj,';1i\~jl",~;"......;,j""!l,,,;.-;,;,.,l .135. ; IfU:fn,lc 'f.AOln~,I:I:S DIF' - , " , ""560 'J - . :l:".-' ~ - _ _",~.l:f..-~_ ..n "_-"'~"""A -'___A' ~'~~.1. ~_..J:,_ __~ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 294,784 542,484 302,992 9,346,703 9,741,309 $20,228,272 990,861 2,130,561 848,315 560,905 $4,530,642 008it!~, OO'~!I!lOOID" D:-, 27,210 214,671 15,293 4,749,018 9,251,576 $14,257,768 32,258 2,861,465 1,337,031 o $4,230,754 i01l!:7JF"2n<-0-6""'5"-0'Q'j": ':7,ri'!?r~Jti:'il'rm'0'~r" "-"II.!I' '!. 'i,~ ; .. "', l:;I'!'lfk;''!;ltli;;" ,,11r;: .'''! m..."..",..... _", .,..._. ,"".,....w~.. It..r "~..;I.JL,ili"A.,,,jJ""_""....,_,;; r8l':~8L;I'i'l789"54@["'~~!~:;,~iTI;IT~~0lf1 .('.,1,."'_"" I. ......J!",.J",....."...!..,....",,11'...', ".... O1.JJ...,,,,;>;;; .k ......_. ~"ll..~".,." _.;_.,;.j..".n"'~I... 'N,l...",., ,,~,._ ~::?'J;I';rO; 6otfi:;~~iJ;;~~:~~hl!~!TlT:r:~O>~ ,.ljJL.,.."il."....."'''''<;..,,''''''',.,j,;tkn;,,,I,'~,.....;'jttrlK..",,,,'J';'<,,i'''',';,', :~-"~--~-";-'-'-:'Jr""J,:"'-r"-""-'-~~'-'---1i , J;;,I:":;,? 9,9; 2,!,0,: II! '(~'" ,5 ;,?Zti;5'3~j!': I'nf.i~J";{'~iIFr('6'-8"''''3'''-2'"''8''M~:1 YiH'I~;',:'2!::.:.;rjt,,;'j'I!W'j~'Ow'~'!j ';1, ....,.... ,( . .', ,,;' ..".,,'..,,','.' "..' "IL.,. .." ~"_L,,~,,..l, ,. ._",h .,,,,,,,,,,,..)/ . L..d"~",'",~dl;r."'fi>.:l"",,,~",,,J $6,257,922 $5,275,538 1."il,~~fj;;'T'7(lW:lI~r:iir:O"~"l:nrW,it}.'l''ttn' )'UiitW:'1:-0':;~~ Ii;' Wh.."h, i'~'i'; ';.",. .-" ",' -' y" ','i,h..,,;.';. iY'-''' ,J-{. '". dY:;:,., ."..:.,."./...ii:\,':lIli,.., .1 WL\"dl'~',,"', ,~l ",,,;::!;I<,, \'_'1':;1 (;i::'I6':85'ii;425,i:'I'Tr';rii'11~'256:'~ }!"~..,,...1._. ",....11....... ,"'"'''~. ,,,.~ ."".__.",~,,,,,.,,,..L,, ""'W~'"'''''' 'l,il,l~n;::iirG1j:iW'!f;[2i,1li:~0" T'j '~';i: ';'7if!1;iF.'iiplj':,'Jil~t:':'0'" ';; [, 'I". 'I".l'...' ',ib.' i" 'i',;;"",.. ,t,"k'Hi,", ."jl~~,~l!'!fI. . '>II ~j ~l trn_I._.....,""'.."i....._,IJ.. . ",~....,;,......"..J'L""''''W;ll''-''_,' "'W" ,"S'24'8261 "1r.",';"e"5"j6oToo(f, i~:t:;LL....!,...I4'"" '...-...-....::~Il2;;.,.:.~~~....;...!.......,,::lii:i $12,102,626 $6,111,250 f''''''''''''',.':.'''''''-''.:,'''.....''\:J'''l''',' """'''''':'''''''''''''"':'::l;i.nr'~ ~ii~!J.1;:;!"'!'!Uli~H'TliJI:'>;"'Fi:~:.t:'I~!'II.,nl'''''''.",,,",,,,,,,."'''m-'''''''''i~''I''''''111~j''''''''':'''.''''':'''' ".""""~"":';','w-''''.:..,.iW'~JV'''''''''''.;':''''''''"""''''''';~:'iW'''~ : ,jjlll;.i!'-'''I...''''''''1W'.''''.....(J'' .NEr~FUND'AC1IVI!~IIHI~"I"I'"tll,;j'~I' I '~~I,'T'I\g, ~1,($15,697 ,630)1'I($10,027,014)'IWj' $5,844;704 '1'", Iii, $835,712.~ .,.."!;ll,k..""tll;h",,,t;,I.," 1,,,1 "', . A~J,m',"',U. '.,..,,,,,,,(,,,' ""W"'.",,;jJ ,,, .",,~lI,'.' ...,ifJ,,,,, ,)/.."...","'"'."".,,'...,,,.... ..JlU.l".; ~"", ,...".<ilIl""..,...II,!"",..,..'llI.i",.",...kw"""I~"",',,.'II.,,''d"W,~"""ljl"..."JIL,,,,,,,,jW__,;,.,,~,d, ,.";;M,>:""''',,,''''d.Jm,,, FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 567 DIF-Adamo Property Acquisition 571 General Administration 572 Civic Center Expansion 573 Police Facilities Remodel 574 Corporation Yard Relocation 575 Library for Eastern Territory 576 Fire Suppression Sys Expansion 577 Geographic Information System 578 Mainframe Computer Expansion 579 Telephone Switch Expansion 581 Records Management System 582 Recreation Facilities TOTAL EXPEND'ITURES REVENUES 567 DIF-Adamo Property Acquisition 571 General Administration 572 Civic Center Expansion 573 Police Facilities Remodel 44,030 580,611 3,915,497 2,131,919 1 ,486,094 5,543,042 5,360,953 41,926 o 245,811 o 878,389 , $20,228,272 22,684 228,525 1,514,438 512,764 -136- 45,351 219,113 11,017,622 1,778,721 1,047,011 49,822 53,423 o o o o 46,705 $14,257,768 21,862 113,019 3,146,323 377,131 "''''''''''mt''''''''''_.'''-''~'''' ",.,t rF"";~"l!"''''''',m-'''^'~r ",. ......"", ~"'1'1:,,;:t~!1!.?Jij~,i,d i:t~~,1,,13,i Pffi$JJF~nE{4"17r6'34::i'l"lt:~'i;iTIr:fmi'fiJITwn:1n;rrWFi:6'.:!: Lil:!*m;,.4I:.....J.,~, .._..w.l~! i'_'Il._,.:I.:ll!.:,ul';jtL;.;;;;.....;w ":;,,:", 2:,'452"92 i'Vi:"'~;2"39'215627 lU"....;;J......,'."""....J.."',...,. ..:;;j:J.;."~J.jJ.;,,,.l.,,'-"--,,.,,' :...,,,,,...,,j;', ~ ",1 77'9"01'5"iP ':~i',:1:;Y36'63'~n .mJ:, J' ,;J...: ,;...; ,.i..,.. '., ".i"" ~i;iJl F', i .1; li;;~;~ '.~'.....h ,,,,-,, __ ~.... '.'" ~"..IJj'- I j::'I~'! ,J:i1'45:'540TI;':Ci):r:'1'f098~2[r6:+ ,:.II M......._..,.n";;.'j~,....""",,, ,j'll ,.".",1..,",,,.....,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,'.. '..""""". ,~""""-''''-..''''-''' -jr:-'''''T''-'''''''~'''I "'''''I 'li,,:,',,:) ik"', 31"'1.2211. ',1,1 "~'~;~!I;';i!fiJ,'at"O\J! 1i!EiJ!; ,lb,;...;:,;"..",'.;";"",,,;!;' ~,;;)!)J'h";~::JM'0i;!;jjM::':\,,,,;~,;~ "fj~~!Jr;,J;r,.,),::g:J4"';'''6-'5. '3",'111' l'li'~I""\i;:~!tI),'i'ji'l"nri1;;g:"O~'" I' 'j',,; 'jl' .1' .."I",;' ./1 .:__'~"';I" .",'';~'I' :,' jl~I~'" .Im in ,;'I~,I,:""",jL-."-"ue.".!;"~,.".,,,,.. "";,,_1.1;,,.1.11. ...".llU!;;;,,,f,,,.--liJ ~'I'" """':"f'I'':1'"'' tllf'''P''!''''''''ro'' """"'I,u""""~!""""'t"r"""""."''''-',,; \;, I;;': '~" ~',,::~I;'~i ,:~i',4 ,,~ fi, 0,' 'l!~WJJ~! r.;::',:I'''.:,:iRi:';ldii,r O:~ t.......,,'.,~~ ""~I>ifj,.........::.J ."..J~"",.....j"'I~'mll..U;"",;...,.,. ,..,,,,, "'rn",.'...''''I''''-'.'.'''I'I'......lll.''.'.......~'''''''i' ~";;."~,,,...,~...,..,,, 'I' "I'"'' "'O~" "" 'I'll' "0 liii4!iij'lt"iV:j-,,'ir',,"',.,. ," -''''';!''i..!'iJ,I!F..-I, .,,-',{ ""'1 ~lJljjJ...;J,I1L.~..Jw"'{,,/""""';J!:,j;::J;;":J.J "l" ''''''''1''''1'''' '''~'''''l~'''''' '"'I''''''II''c",,,,''' ""1(...':':'-""". -,..:n91",-,,'fllitOO"':"lii "':""'i)",;"-""..-.-"I.,,,,:,,:., p'!"":"":'-.O" b.::t!t.tll",ll~iiiliL'i;'d~~I';~';Jij ,U!ri;;,t. ,it:;,;,. 1(; '~"""""'""I''''''~'''~''''''~'' .-,~ 1...""',..r".....""ml'I:!' ''''''''--''1 "', 't,' '" '''1'110 ", '1'1" "0" '~I~':',.,.. ;, ''''''iiH..,','''','"", ., . iij '''''''';:)..'I''''-''''i " -"."'" ,t..'. ',,'1 .,,,.; k.......ix ,'l!Afij~."'>>i.dlt:... ;J;;;;....,:,DWii uw . W:;';I<.,,;;I; IIJRWiA:';l,ltJ( 43,;6 81lIHmrm~inm~7f:!i',:!..';!lff!i:':'rrH!O);' 11""....._......, b.... ,,-'.....,. jl.."...,lil~wllii..",.......,,~.~.,....~ $6,257,922 $5,2i5,538 rr;,]G;l~;TI,SIIt:i]F':I~',!); 6!jhE-;;; 'i',:I'l':'i.:"I:' 7~!:1,1 ~i,,7[i o:,~ i...iI,,,.~,I..,,,,.,,!iw,,,,....,,.~,,!,,J;J 1.i."...J""""d ("",illl". ",f..~", !""""",m,_,,,___ 7Jr~".'2M".",,~,m~~ ,;iI;"':,~: 6~9" ,1,::;0,,,,: '.;"I,,~.:,~6':L 49,2 ,I, 1': -;;'1""936"'700 :'1; ':"~":'1;,"2'041' 1 1'6'1. j hl,.,":..L:,jj,.,i,' "",".."".' .,,",~" .10; jf;"l~,j'~"d"jl;..,,,..,:,,, '. 'i."", ,,:;, ~ "-'n''-;'~''--'".,,,~,, ."",-~_.>"..-! """t:.-;,-'-'" ,1r:'T'''''~'' ..,.... "", 'j I' ''''"'1 516'350' I'"'' 'm,148,260"l JJt{F:I~.;.'.'I~'4"'."._,~""iJJ 1;!L.:::;"i~~~;,.}""...!~ ,~....,,,,,~t. ,PtJ'BI:'ICEl\CILlTiIE$ 'OI,F ' -. , ".. 560 - i -- - " ,,. - ~-.. - - - - - - - _.., I 574 Corporation Yard Relocation 575 Library for Eastern Territory 576 Fire Suppression Sys Expansion 577 Geographic Information System 578 Mainframe Computer Expansion 579 Telephone Switch Expansion 581 Records Management System 582 Recreation Facilities TOTAL REVENUES 476,385 605,734 526,269 278,075 74,029 5,158 177,803 108,778 $4,530,642 332,684 608,302 (411,998) o o o o 43,431 $4,230,754 \'..... '-'.".,'-'''',-, r""'''''"I''"'''''', '" W t,:.1~;:,j:,~;.,y)~g ,"~,QJ)J,,,~~;)I:~i;,il!;/;tl;~,,1g,;!~ ':......_-,. ',':.''!!!-'-- ""~T"-""~".'" r<"~::'~"f!\'l'*W"-""'." ........ " "'1 L':. ,_~9,\?Q,9~,Q,::J1 ~.L~~:1,1~,3.?Q,J j:;:;;.~;'::J";,::':~78'~li,15'66'-,'j\:,::'_;,i:1F}P'1'2j'~;6T5nil ~,.l\,;.=.:n........,,,,,-...,____J ..._._..............._.~ ..._...........!J r:~_~!J2251;lt;~r~.KQ][!~:~ijrjE2IIJBL~f.9Jj ! ;'?' ;~rr:"7i\n;;;'l~I'nn'm--::'Jl;':, 'w;rn,~1 ,iT;;~'m~!rr,."7J, .'- -"I)"... ..;.".,.w....,!.! HJ... 0 "'l",'!I!^+!t. "M.,!!ll1"'" -'0._ ,::~_~,~j~,m::J1;~)i;;;':'.";'!:';;I~jj;:.~'j;~Ii.L'i;;:;'::_.",> t,:';;U!!:;!.'Jii!:',!i,.,jQ~'.,:;'jjg~"i;~~I5J~lil~m!~l~Ti~9,] !2;i'7.:",j'.7!:i;:;nr'pijr()::V'-:'1~~''7f;']r.tf!::-nlj1 ';i,~Jtii",';1';,L;:";i'illbl.".,:ui,,,'i;;'imi\..,:,,,;;,L,:!:;;jil~J,;:;,:"i.u",,;~11 ff':,I'jl);~r-6~92"~j'ig~:1j>1:'T~;:'7;-;F1(59'.:i5b"~r :~:~lL,!;,:l~.".; "'_ 'll".,,,",,,,,,;!; .~;.":;"n iic,i'i;;:: ";>~""',"_'H _,;:~ $12,102,626 $6,111,250 ~.~< """'~"""""".~"""'" '~".'" ....,,,..."~";.lf".. ""'~"".I;""\""']'-.:';;1"."t:^"'.:.JP""';i'!.lr-';"',,"":11: !l'.....'7'n..".... "!"" """"'~"..". ' ..'"'.,...,..,..~..'T'0. ."t~''''''''..-.'''.''.-'lw'\...":''~T'-';:-;.:t~'''''~''J:.'',; ;""'~'f~""''';''';':;'.':.'.~~r'. "':."1.~;.,.'''>!'''.'''.~,..''....--.:.:..j NEl:iF;UNQ' i\CJIVIT'(;,;!,";";: .!,;;o'IH':::"~ i:--lf):, "~"~I} ($~ M97,630); .:-($10,0,27,014) ,I't ',$5;844,70,4:;:,:':,:,,;, $835,7,1,2, ;"1'.... ~lJl.i";;',,"l1M,,, "dlllJ,...; '; 1">l..~'u.,fl,I~,,. .;;.,.,'''',~.,,~I...;, .,."""1-".:,, '~i.,~"..J.:llI,,;, ~.,,,:l,"',,I,l"',,;.;; .- .,~~lI.I,,',,'~.,.!~...m~..w;"...'w~_ ;; ;; ,~;,_.'.".."'I,k;.'m"mJ<1", ".~."""".IL.,__....~_'n."."lJ,;,, \< ,'~,_. ,",;;IW,M,. ", :.;:.....,".;UH;.l; ,. ",..i~,~",., , -137- : P~l!)ESW'IUA:N, BR:loqE on '~(t:JN'O: .: ..'. " '5'80 ;,: "- - - - - - ~ - - -- -. - ~ - -""'"-- FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Other Expenses TOTAL EXPENDITURES 639,090 $639,090 REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 157,161 262,696 $419,857 1,233,609 $1,233,609 ,~~~'~~~~'~.h"J~,,-,"<~,""!,':""""""":l""-'-'!""'--"7'1 :,; ;;',1,079;566;' "1.";;[1,,;:,,/46;200"; t.J~')'_"_''''''''_'''''''''''''''hM L.lhi."JIll,,,".Jl""'" .,.........."J $1,079,566 $46,200 138,427 271,292 $409,719 !! \;1''2 '!i'I!0iiJ /i;~C::'~D-;r;Jif, i',!, : ';!:'!;:'IJ;00}I"i' o:!,~ i.~i;;(;' ;:~,i!i '::,!:/-iH,;.;;:U,n" ",-'-J ~'l,!,);,iml;j;;',;']i).':I:;;';im:;,;"",,!!;! r;~f::1i::!1I~~?<t1l;Tz~~a~Jl;~~&1i,:~]T9~9,:iJ $421,178 $90,000 ,'~,....~"~r""""""""~"~T''I''',;','.~r''''''''''''''-;;;'7'71'';;jr;jnr~i_1~t;J1'~t~!;lri"~;~~';lrt-""""-"':-"""""""yq;~u;::'~'-:";''''1''7' ""f:"~"'.n;;n1""~""''''''''''''''"'~''''''''~!ir~1Im'!:''F'.''''~''''i:'''''~t'!'':ml [NET FUND' ACTlyrrry,..,.." ',"',:I( I, "1""1,; ,..' y,...",,: I, ""'III" ($219,233),.:J",J;'," ($823,8~.o>" ,J P '" ($6.58,3811)' I "1,,1$43,80q, ,,~,,',"'.,,'il1l~ ,'.,..".;,Il"","""'~'L'. "',;Jllj,,,,..j,,ll,h...,,..;,,,,,, .;'. ,; " ,."'.' ,. i~1 ..... 'j..la,,,",".,,ii4j,,,.,,,,,,, "., ",<,.""...""...,,~,, .,;, .,...l,~..,._,,, '.'ow ~";j'J.,.""j1j,~,,,",,,.j;l,....... ,~.w""..d..,..". ,"'II.,...... ..,,~H.,..'w,lllru,;; " ..1, ,u"'..A~I",,,..,.,.\IIII",..".., FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 587 OIF.OR Village Pedestrian Ramp 588 OR Vlg11 Pedestrian Bridge OIF TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 587 DIF-OR Village Pedestrian Ramp 588 OR Vlg11 Pedestrian Bridge OIF TOTAL REVENUES 638,764 326 $639,090 78,207 341,650 $419,857 1,233,609 o $1,233,609 ,m:;:;,;'n '6'76 .j6EHnl;"~i""ii'::'4-3 'oii'6 ,ill L.:';':;uj;"'~!'''''''''''''''_~;,-.~,~:LL",,,.dtiili;~....!_~,......;;.UJ .-, "" -' '-", ..'" " B);.''''''''I'''''Ji' "....1 [J; ""i "'3200U ,.." '3200 .': "~". '.',,' :;"';. . " ""'<""JII"',":'., 1.:1" , 'l! M'b'~LJJJ:"u-,~_ .:' . f"~~'~'_~4L~ $1,079,566 $46,200 57,760 351,959 $409,719 h";;j ,..'t"'II,:,: 17 1:;78111,::'''' ",iIii"r'4iY,'000,m ~ Uk...:,.. lJi...'._::,]",...,.J.;J.., .:IUl~"!.;.::...,:~"~l_..~..,~._,,,,,,,J !::li'r;:25"0~6'o6,!r:!i;,);'':;ipill;'56'' 00'0111 ;.,!;..."...,b..,;.,..,,,,,,.,,.'..,,,,.......,,...'.':1Ii.hJ',";;;),;!;,i'-i,;r"""".'....,,,,,,,,,,,lli $421,178 $90,000 'NEiQ;UN DJ Ac,iiivliiyi;:;~iil!~i;;~::::"~1Ir,i::;;I;~!';!ji'l~~1~ri$ ?19,233F:F;: " Y$823;S90 )(;:"'::;"'($658 ;388 j"i,~;~;.,;,:~~;: $4'3 :aoo;,1 w.~I" ",'ll:JI",.w,I,,,,,,,..,,I"'c,.lIq,,..lljo<,,,,lffiIL,,,,,....,JJ,!""h''''m"""'',,,l~R, ,1,;,J,.",,,.,,,,1""~'''''IllJf....l,,,,,,~,,,'''lll~ ,. ".",01,,,,,,..,. ,11lI,1.."",..j,~"~,.,.jl,,,.~,,,.."'HMIj,..,..i!,,..,,,.,. ,Jb....,.. ,.lol-i,~,.",,,........,...,,ljL.,,,,. (~..;'.jh,j;jIlW;.,,,,,...,,",,_,;J .138- TRANSPORliXif,ioN-liIF FUND' - - - , , 5'90\: j . - . .' -- -... -. -- - - _ __ _ . ;t _ ~ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES 105,727 842,479 60,542 7,008 456,252 $1,472,008 REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 1,224,923 719,921 o $1,944,844 47,143 2,419,673 o 4,156 738,403 $3,209,375 1,171,546 471,713 o $1,643,259 r^'i~':m~':7l'=''' ":il.n''''-''''~,1 j~'rc'H!ilr: ....,....,:'r'::..~'m.jlf ,]i:il~~,L?:,!;1,QQ.o,~JljIH,q"i:';/!i..i.~1d.;Q9...o~j /- :':.:----'-. .m.....,.._'~'M'1mm:...'...1..'fl.'"'-.-.,.._w_.-~jl :. :"Li580:916I' "::")",,,580:9,16,1', . ._.._.......t.. ,.........._Jo..lU,"'.........______ r;r::rr '~"~Fr~:-;'TI::rr,,:rr,.i;r0-'''-'I''Wir:::;qr:7f;~:'.l" '(;-0";'] 1, ':>< dd:':<J' Uiil',wNi"."'''''' :,:-, 1",,"';';"";'!';:"",_"!li!:>;' 1,1;,:: ::1, u. ........."". .,1ll,;;:..I_..;;lJ.,_,,~..J _. ""',""",,'~ .. ~..~ Il\,"';^...~" [;'~;,iJ!'-::::,80:n,'t;-'"';:,t'5:30(I;OO0i1 1l;..~,1l._".,~.. il~,.'.... .,; ,,,,;"';,-,. h..........tlt.... .~,,~.,~. ''',,"'' ","'-'. ,,":;::'7,22'i';'41~1 il:I~~i,":2: ii45', Cmen Ii;:, ,;; 'ilL",...,......,..""',.,, .ll,"~......"., M J,. n.!L:", ."..h~",.,".'.'.,n .w,~!,; $1,193,604 $8,936,916 ~"-="~"~-r ~--iir'1 "--,~" "".,.,...= ".;., ""h;. ''''I';;;'',''J'i,';'.1' O'::'J ","""..,.;. ,.,.,.,,'FI1"'..0'," .".".;~I,<.,,;'iI' .';.:;.11'.'.'"'' .:'; ,; .:.:. 'l""":';) ,k"...', !" l,.'. '''"w'l4;i":,-ajlJ:j">l:;!.:.Jt'4frL,..."",L.,,,;.!t.ln;~''''''J:.;,.;...111!....!1J..," ,~S~ "';:i50,oool1f:?""",.--ts"670efo:J L^"......,;;i<l,~"....,M, ,',"'k''''''''''..' w",;.dljJb.,."~,,~,,.. """,;.,,,l,<ll .;1;:::'1'/::1'80, 0067"11'1:',1:,1 '402'1'50'0'1 L\;d;~,>:.,.U~,,;...,..,....'.." ",,,~,~ii\i .,w :..:.'!!lll~,' !,,~,;.,.'. !"~";;IJ!,[, $930,000 $2,152,000 """"''''''ff""""~",.........,,..,...,,~,,,,~,,..-,,,.,,....<''mlfll-'"':'~''''K<lJryI0T.l7''''~'''''~'"'fl'~~":"Ir.;J'!"l""""'''':~l'''''''''~rr:r'-''-'''''''r::-~~.'~r'r''1i.~'''''''''-''''_~"''-'''''''''''''''''''''''m''''~':"mTttI''':',...........W INET f;UND ,'ACliIVIJiY!i,i, ;1:!(,;;:Hi:",,";i'i'!,II' :', Ji'n!:"~<',~ 'JI'I" ';;1:1:$472:836:;"1:1,($'1;566,1:16):" ];;'1"($263:604) 1;1,($6,784;916) 1t.........:l.JJ~lJiJ,;lI;;,.:.;;m.,"..lM;IU...wWlj;Wtliiii.Il~;r..1i.'Jw !,~"j"""'l<il' ~ em ., ".:.::"J;.;..~;'~'~tffi~m""""""",.;L;d....~~.j!'i' ",',...j,''l.....>:,;;;w ' FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 591 Transportation DIF 593 Western Transportation DIF Fund TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 591 Transportation DIF 593 Western Transportation DIF Fund TOTAL REVENUES 1,472,008 o $1,472,008 1,944,844 o $1,944,844 3,209,375 o $3,209,375 1,643,259 o $1,643,259 n:;;;-:-17"0 13"6047f:/P"11 8 936':91(3:1 !u;;;U:;;".:",.,I_,~,,_.,1 ,~.",,_Jj~ t~:: ;/ix.." I, ,,'~....~, ~.~L...~;; rrn".".,-' 'NI~-"""'~'-'-"""" ,..!,/)'..".:~[ 180'000'1 Jilli:;''''i.'';]II'ffi-1''iJ i1jl'0..in ,:;;;,liiLi...;i;Iii"""""'....,,,,,,,..;i;.Jlr'/,i,.iil);..;i;i.lU::;;Rlijjfii":, ,,,;!i;; $1,193,604 $8,936,916 r7D"'iJ75-0~ OOQ':lI'!"'CI"', 2f152 :ooWi 1>,.;!iJ!i>.~,Al,.. .,,",~ ".v;,....."o:,l:Jk ...;~..w"'J~".,.,,. ".!~";,,.,.,,~!t..' f'm-::;;:;r''fiicr60o '[ll'~';I<!!r:-::'i/lI!li;;:'Q"r1 ,. ';;;il;'!/:;~!~b".-.""".!. ,;,;".".,;',J !1J;j;:'ii)!lJli:':'Oi~:;~;:,dI;l'I,:,c: ",';iL: $930,000 $2,152,000 ................"-r--=t-;-"",, 'I ., "'11. 'YT:i~ffl'~::;;;;:p:W~~~I'~"""'~'~:''1!I'':~'"~'''''~'''''''''r.1r::m'''::-'--~~~~.J:l_''''-'''"~"'>I""r;;JO.~""'" NET:f;UND'A<;,lil~lvy.I',ir' ii, :'.:':11", ' ,II":" I"" ,"li,(::I;,:''';:!!,.', $472:836;:: ii", ($1 ,566,116 ),i/1i'iI'" ($263;604 In':':' ($6, 784,916), w.........,,jI.......'-;,,I;<."';;,,\-J'-',j,-",l.il,,.J.ul!ll,("',~ '--'--'.J,u.:,C4i:.':ii1];;",~,,,JII,,,,WL1';J,u;:,,,,~.~...~,........<,_,,,.,~..l:li;::J1JI,w,,_h'..,iliii....;,.~ ~'.... ..;".i1lJ:,~,,,.~,...,,,,,~,,~,....._,,....!,4J._.,,,,,<,.~itW.:,,,,.......,,~,,~...j "139,, MIISC C~P'II~tIPROJECTS :FUND- . .- ,:::' ],00. ! I '~.: - _ _ _ t- _ . " _ ~ _ _ ___ _ _ _ , .., _ . _ -.l FUND SUMMARY o 100,000 721,392 15,266,985 $16,088,377 393,650 2,688,192 7,980,398 37,596 o $11,099,836 o 12,303,540 1,961,650 1,823,187 o $16,088,377 o 860,937 9,638,675 599,788 436 $11,099,836 -140. 7,500 1,019,145 718,405 5,140,904 $6,885,954 151,325 2,146,264 1,468,781 o 1,102,129 $4,868,499 o 4,816,511 693,302 1,376,141 o $6,885,954 o 1,225,614 3,388,061 254,354 470 $4,868,499 [~nJJ,;f:;i~':iQQQ'.:r:t~rfJn;J:];l0t!~:r@, ~I,' :'-,}:;;i:'1:,2'b'3:'6'ii:r~ "';~'U%C.;;i~~25r6'66!!i[ i,';.,l>i!' " oJ..', j, <; '.,",,' "J) E...-.,.-'......,."''''..,....r''.~........._....'''.. I;: ''''';. 681,358".,[.'.:.:": ".679,242.... ......."".....~...__,,_<:..l A,,,,,~_.,,,...~._........il '~~-~~"'"'r'~--~_.QTIt'7'~''''''''''~1 .,' ).9,1',15,750.,., ;',;ill 2,000:000::, L,kl!..:._.._.."....;l..,. ...._,_,-' lli.''',il,'l;,,''',''''.~....,...~.,";~,..,;, $11,015,778 $2,704,242 EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Other Local Taxes Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES ~t.,--;r,;p-200' 00...0')....'..,.' ," ;;;:;-5'0''''0''0-0i7! .o..'i",'o, , ,"',,',"'" "0"';";""".., i... '''diJl)J)h.-,,,,,,,,,,.......,,'''.,.,,,\'.,,j L;M.1L..... ,'tilw",.",.,~:.n:."."Jn U-:~-:-:'I~I ' ":;T~"1'-0"'f'W~~<1O";i"1~''lJ''''1'71ro-1nj F'r,~!.',,':i,;I,!lfI'.W.. "I'::,',j'!';!(d'".'I';':i,},I""", ,II "" ,'" "~hl"".jjtu"" "lr~b" "llll "',, "','~""'m;,,"" "_,A""""""_,,,~,,, [; i',;'1'o6b'606:1'i;:;'l:'J5b6''Od-6~:i ..;,,,, ~,...;,.,,' "_",, ,;'._"",,,,-,., I, '~'''''M'~,I.Al"""",j,,,!,,..,,,,,~,,,,,,,, ~!~'7;~,,"i;""'!'I!'?':::T:;lIl'r""?J"W rO:'t'llI;'.'/'"'jl-'''TT'MF'';;"''t''' H .Ii l'-l1:"!1jl!i*~"; J 0 1!;;'~"":':111,l"'. 'k~ii~!'h 0 ::;j .....;......I~~.Jr~ll...r"'. 1,~;:;;nM.~;;m_:;:tl.W!lu~_.:!W f]HYI1!fiS'i!miE~q:~t!'i;JQ5il~2iN&q;'Q[Q1l@ $1,200,000 $610,000 i"I'" """"'1"";; """""""'''W'''':'''''''''',,',,',' ''''''':', "'tj'~':,':"'!"'~,'!,w:..'.',"'7'r;'!,':~W'[",,"i'~'l'i,,'mW!"':"'-"~~"';""I"~I""' .."-..,, """""l",,',ymr.,r' ,,'" "': ;"'I"""":"'!"'''''''''I~'7,.''.':''''et'' "'"lI;'''''-;!',~I't''''-'''''!''r",;''m'~''' "'~)'*";;_'\!""I"""""""": ,NEl;.F.UND.,iACnWT,Y", "'" 1'1::", ;;;iiIJ' i,3 I!' l,i,jl~'I:;) I' :1',~i;JI:($4;988,541 ):;"''',($2:017 ,455)i,.;" ($9 ;815;778),'", ""($2;094';242),1 .......,;.'I,j/Oi j;;l;>Il~'lW<",'~rfn'i""'t.il;"i:II'~,lWil.". ~..Jl~;:.;;:;..:.;w'lm~.tl;';,;..:...-l:"~ illJ..........,;i~"_~....:~:.:..;;."~,k>""":::...;;,_~....;;;;Ui"'~"'~j,,,.,u..il:-i~I~,;;J.,;;.,,~~L..i4-.Jl,,.1f,~,.'lliIfo,l..:, FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 713 Capital Improvement Projects 714 CIP - Fiscal Agent 715 Park Acquisition & Development 717 Resid. Construction/Conversion 725 Indust. Development Authority TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 713 Capital Improvement Projects 714 CIP - Fiscal Agent 715 Park Acquisition & Development 717 Resid. Construction/Conversion 725 Indust. Development Authority TOTAL REVENUES 1''';'';'I'l:l'!'w''''''('1n''--''''''''I'''''1!:;!r;'';;'",l'1't~'~'''';t;1"""'\;!11'1"""~-"'4 ";'!!.'t~;:;~;;'~;,~fla;fi:9.d~I:J~":":;fl~'!b.~riHI~'::: fBLQ);" J.!i.""'ll;r-'~"fr;l"r::,'w..~;, ''''I!'L'':'':'~ill,;.;::'m''''';'':l'flr",''''''lr, 10t:;.1f~!iLj;Ulill~~'QJd~ii1iJkJt1$;~~ i'i'Hb 377~'291'!11, ::i,!I'2'!'02S'!"0001; tL,~,...,~~_.......",.!.MJjjJ""'"Jl..,....'_"'''''''''',,,,~~ ~1':hI.: 6'3S:~87,""!"'-:;!i,r 679-:-242;,;' _'~"_"'~"_..w_"."~_,.J;.J'M',_,..,Jw._....,,-,..:.:....,,,,,..,,.<l,W 1;J!!r:;~,:ry7FiGT';.r;rM:3~6:ffm~j'i:>:ii! 'i "~,i',lW~,V,;~cm:J ~i;~:,:iil""c."J,L'd.,,~IH' "",. .ut! ,"w, "I.M;, JlHL",~,jhl", ".,"~, j $11,015,778 $2,704,242 t-'"_., ""C" ""'-"'~QI'''-~'''''''Ic'' 1'''''''''''''''1i ~:,;; '.;i"';Jl~,;';'!lJlj'i I!IiO!, 'f,"'h !.(~~;l It'I'\',lt'),'OJlj .)"""lIlL. ,;"" ,...~ib,-",wt"", ,;~1 "' }""M,~"",;"'b~",,,, '.......R,:,,"'""'.. [""';"'l""':"""!"i!;,;.':BI"lfI"'''''''''L",,'H'!N"V'''''J:'i':,:'''!f''~t':; ':,"'''':,'' !"i, W'lt-,; /h:,1",' .(<'OHil,'ll,j'<it' "L"~,I,j,,, ,o",{ '~I."J:JL~.!!J. CJ"~'w...2'~~li...lf,t;~... EbrJEd!IQ:Q'Q~QbO;~JWj!;n(;:j;'.;~i1!5'0J2~do)1j "-'-';""'''''2-0''0'' "'0"0"0"'::'.,c;mr-".ri-1"'O'00'''0-' h"''i,di,Iii;:: ..; 1I;1.;)if:i";'i~'if;!l,:,,'.. vi!;'1 ....,i".,-....____..~......_,.'_~L__~~,....~'........ ~jl~.;:[iEHEHiffii!~:I':9~W~jB!~~:;n;!;;fg~:1;;rrm~,QJ~ $1,200,000 $610,000 ~~'"''''''''1'''t'T....,~"..,t-'~''''''''''''''''''-'''~~:::1~'~T':m;<:I;,.'~"?1'''t~~''''''''--''''''''''''-w~rr:,.~-'.'''-'-' '~'-""''''''-~'t''''~''''''''=--''":'~'-'''''rr-:r"""'"''"''='~a~-'~'''''\fj NE:r"FUND:,A<;:tIVlrv':":"."i':';;"".;":'i,l';t,;.:'"';" )i'/($4,988,5~1) ':;, , '($2:017;455)',,,; ,,($9,~15;778)!, :'($?,094,242), L,t;-" Hilllj'"",,<lIl-"..,,; :;;'"."~,,,,.;"IL:, ,""I"I":;",,.~I,I"""""'lk;;,:,,~It;;;"""lii' "",:,J..",,,, L.""im,J.,,^;',lil,~<,,"'''''''I'~' ",~;;,;;,.,.;~,hh;,,,,,:.,...,,,,;,,,,~u.;,,,,,,;,,;j(U;. '" ,~I_,;,,-,';,.l<;", ",U"il-"":,.""u~u."......,."",,,..,#, ,', ,~..l"c'" 'MI....,,,, ..r""" I~ ,gtHER TRANSI?OR1\A1fI.dN .P,jU}GRAMS' :FUN():;::~' ":, /'3.0. ; ... - --.... - , I ::.---- "'= .~:..: _ '_ ~ 'f~_ _~"_' - ~~. Jo. "l.:._ . _ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Revenue from Other Agencies Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 134,619 220.929 1,731 2,470.155 $2,827,434 415,642 2,131,919 67,952 o $2,615,513 o o 429,726 406.589 $836,315 115,623 4,292,540 2,769 o $4,410,932 "'U""'-r--'!~"''''1'''''~j$'''- '-,'''",;m:'I'i''''If:'-''''''r'''''''!::1'''-g j!,!:{-:q;'ii:^'::::: il;';';').' 'Ii:_ 0 il': . ;':li"1;;h'~'";"i;<\iIN:';_;:'H( 0 'i,: t.......:_':.lu...i:.u;." ."",,,.>}l,,,-'_..-4tI..:..'.,,L.,iJh~t!'Ull.Jl.,.t... "l0mw:'r"::-::~:"T,";~lt-:'-O~jrr 1'11r,.,,";r:;li"::;::C:W,I'w:"r:-~ fill"-' ,,'Lid"':" 'j11<,):!I;!,),,, .101 c: ::;P:II'/<'dt" ;;::, ~,,<,,;,'il' 0 >.. ~ .ljJ;;..~ .i~,:~...It;J~j~_.:a~~,,;;,..;'...,,;jWIJJjQ k~ ........:::o.ij r;:~!',;I~':::!'qr:;Fir1if'I:;:;i69~1'18;;;n)1!f40iTf6cF?l lillw~_ (..t..".,J.;u,~:!,:,!i';..._.,.~l'" :"dj~d,,'~' I ~",~....,'.,...;"">.,,,,d [;!4 ,'8'~8ii4~6~:r.';r:;'T7,689:86i11 ~I~:, .."!,..;...,.....,...,..,,.t..., _'''~' .." ~,,~ ,'.'riliJk~.,;.,. ".,~"...,l..,""....:"......,'" $8,884,899 $9,091,861 ~83;lI)t,:~~I!;imll'r1i!;;,Oi\jl-<,,;t'k:!iIILlr]1~;~'m:iif60' Ja.."..,...J.t.-,-:,.::!ll";.,."","",.,,,_,...J"'''<<'i',,,,,,, ,,":!,,..,,...,...,..~,il...,,.mj ~--'~----:-r~I~~v-"~~n ~t.' 1.1,gg1 ,~~8Ji':II",d ~&0:Z;',<q~,1il 1"W~""""""~""'1i ,,"'''" "1""'''''''''' ["'-""""""-"'-j .' I,.:J~.'\ ,\;111i,;!t;;";';.'I'i:.'Of {~m;fi ;'," r",;,""~7!!;id 0;1'1 .<!,'""d,lllO'. "., ~W,..,.,ItJ,I""",''''l~' :,. .1.".".. ,~l .",..,.,111.....;; ",L. .", f"tt',"l!111~""l~~lr'I(I"'.... '-''\'f. ~~lI"""'.."!""l'I'.'r::l!.~.--.~<11 UI','''~:,..;'I,:,:;I,',:;i'.,;'h~,l'i/'J 0 ""g:!-4:'i-r\I'~ ~;i;1 :'1 ;'42 911t , ...,:".,l~:"", _,;l!!;....,;~.,"l,;..."..I1,l..,",I,#t, '!..', :llM",~jJ",..__......""",,, ,,:~, $14,001,588 $9,678,490 rN-.'t,--ET>F..-U"..,.,......NDTA~C: .T...~IV."'..I-T'~Y.'~}ilr:frj~I;w~,,,,,1,~I~~li~i;;:!1F%;;j.~;7f(.,'$.~2"1?-,92~1. i...)iF1.~$~-3~5"~74..,~6-.'1.~7..~;Il!/0....$~5i....1'1~6. ~6 8-'':19'' _',r:;q;,:;~i?$-5.'''''''8"6'''1r6".....2-9~ I.. " ." .....';:..h",., .,,', I .,.,,' . ,.',,;,,;1 .'n1"I<".::'dl'j)'wJIHI;.;ii;'"rk:.-;.)hl'-<:-;;:'.A:.-;....:"1.!1':-:"" ...,' :il.,,, .., 1""""'''''''' ""I .,... ". , , ,'".' .......'It i",::... ,.. ", ;.~. ...." ..... ,;jiL.....,."rk',,:I;... '. ,.,,'. , ,'" ....',,~ J"'~, ..u...,,,,;l!<,.,,.l/.lI",..';,'m"'....,'IIW.1,,,,,,.... If;. ,:.I~.,j"._ I",; ,.,,;.... ~"<,lll".;,,,;,lJ.I,," ..,~"';.jjU",!,"-."""l.'-'.,.~,WUl;"i~<1~j"....I"'...w...di". ,~...."':.__",,"~ ..Jk ,.,'......,"""lllo;'1"',.",~illm"......."",'J..__.~.,...l,"',"i<I.~i"..-..;lW,',;.. FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 723 Bicycle Facilities 735 Transportation Partnership 736 Other Transportation Program 737 Trans Equity Act - 21 738 Cal Trans STIP 739 Traffic Congestion Relief Fund 741 Prop 1 B Hwy Safety TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 723 Bicycle Facilities 735 Transportation Partnership 736 Other Transportation Program 737 Trans Equity Act - 21 738 Cal Trans STIP 739 Traffic Congestion Relief Fund 741 Prop 1 B Hwy Safety TOTAL REVENUES 289,499 309.028 120,825 o o 2,108,082 o $2,827,434 68,571 10,983 244,457 52,739 9,295 2,229,468 o $2,615,513 50.926 4,910 256,315 o o 523.063 1,101 $836,315 50,926 612 277,077 o 1,075 390,184 3.691.058 $4,410,932 ""^''''?''t-_''11r-:,~m~~F:j'' "m!,!: IV"'-J'''i 'i''f''~''''''~:' M_'_'''''') ,,,Ij, ;<f, ,r",' ,,#,1 i"l'i'~ 0:1 ;WI,;..4r--'I, 266 ,-220 FI Le,," d... "",.L"j,J," """.5 ',_.'" ,"",,"",,_," ""'''''"""""' [1;}1:'!!i'~,;,:rttr'tt~e~'69'J;I;:);i~;il;~~;I:;~ii.iqF!:;1.i~!bi'!l; "..;.J..IW'ilf,..~.l'I~il"~",,,.,,<J~ ;::',,,~~I, .".~~.~I,I..jll'.H,,;L,Ci,.:;~ Iii ;;;;:'7; i"90:'830;i;;:,ir.r," 5;"09""2 :234'~ 1~..*.Wit".. -.....~...-'A"'._.~m:::....!u.. ~.._.-...___,.....I~IJ:J l!l'W:~:;:;lW:,,:...'''.....7~...'''n.''~,i''!:;'n:!t!I~1H:.m:[.';';~II"' ,1I' r'''' '1""215"0001',1,,,," '"'" :;:';",':1':" 1"',0','l "',....J~.J,j".............,_:::.:.;u~,IW",.., ." '>'''''''''1'''''''''''' mt";"'li....,~.,~,. "......,' "1''''''m''''''''II'''~''~''- ~ ""I ',....,'..'"...,. ..-'....., ''''''01 '1"11 t..-'....".I I""""" ('-......"0.'" r;~J1.;l)I,!jjl:F,:~~iJ;a'..%,ii!i]lliB;!,'!iU:';k~ J~ii:7!mr;29 79';i50"OJ'!lmn:r;':mm/G48T5oo'iJ1 l!L..,.,_jl.l<,___..~ ........,_...1 =_1Jj,..__" l~...,.__,__~."...l. ,.,r:i""-;-791i;r~'no-" 7;7''''3"" ""385 '4"-Ofj'", lH:....,"I",....''''''I'''..''''II,..., I";I/.,,.,l....... . , .~L'.;di4i;;;l;-llil.;;.':;:,I,f.L;;~.,:.Jll.i ,;.;l~~,I!iL.,'" '.~..."...,! ~.. "..."Jil;; $8,884,899 $9,091,861 ri;::r~;~i'""141"319: :1'~,r'''''T:J'267, 6"49"":1 ~,~:,.-;)~..:;;;;i,~lr~ .~.. '~..l'":~..ll.I;,i:!.....IJ'i1'-1'""-, ........,,' "..,~..,,";.':!; l;::<:~.;I', ;;8'-)1 ;'!~f~:iJ'P';ro'1! 1,\.I!ril,V,I~'~I"'ffmq:i-~f::::~O)Q l~H'; "..."",,,,,,::!J'J,",bv';,,.;; ."J~ ';.';;!ilu",." tl.d,.,m"lh"",h.~..", ;,1 r""'l'~'8;982T50o;:1(i'j9f"""5'i6"'i7;:434": ~k:, ,,,,.J~,,. . . "_"",,..... ."", " .",,;l.! .>:.1.:':,'--.....", ..,,,,j;.~. .....-"..d",,:tli [""'"''"'1'"""" """""' """"""" "'''1"""'1."0"'''''"1''""11'''' "",'"""'", ~i,.:~:,'LI:L?J.,2.',Q,9._Q1,,:ii!;I~;i;1;tl;;;;~Uff.'!ri~;9rkt E~~'~i:~~'iL'!:~.;~'~~':'ij3l5J~Q~;2 ~~;~~~C;~;#~~r~i:1IQjl r::" 1'1:1', 0"00;'0015:;': ::';1'~,,:~::348: 06'61 LL.__...._ -,,'.._'_ .....~......j..lt-'-._'--'."'___.........~ !"I "'""3"""'6""6"2'7""6"""9".'" """""1"""3"'3""8""5""""'4. "0" ,7~9 La:~:~....;.,,_;':"',....;:iiL.~~:~,.,_~...;. .:;,: $14,001,588 $9,678,490 'C';':"""""'~j''''''' ',,~,,~,''-'' ""'r.'"'''''''''' """m'''''j~lt !l")":I.':--:..~ltr.l!."'Tr"".'T'.Tr:'~...~:. ;;.-milr",.t "I"""'-"-'-'''"~'''~'''''~''c'''''ltr''. -::.'!^.",',.,,,,.,.'''''7'''''~.-..~'''''';;'~tm:,.''i-'-''.,.-'fr''ll'''''4~1':'''''' "!~f""TImi:n'-'''"'''''"''''':'-:'~t''''''--'~CJ: "NET:I:'"UNQ ACTIVITY: '"'""1)',11:" :;'1.1".,"/:'; i', ;';"::;":'"'","1:($211,921).;' ,'"I $3',574:617,:i;:,I." ;$5;116:689'!::,"I,:, ; :$586,62fuj "'t,.".."...!,lli~'L>fll,..J~I;...."...{;."J,.._.d'....:i~.....M.I.....:;.J:Su!,..n.~"'""'""-a.jfu"".-,c-,,,-..;..I;,,",,,,,,,,,,__,,,_L..; .._.~,1.,.1.-_",,,",,,,,,,-,_......_~.;J,.oL..jL...,,......,,.., ''''<i",."l'H'_~"_.. _l._,Ul."._it;cl,~, ""141"" r' I c~ c', ~' I,ll If Cc ",1];, ~'I/.&1i" Iv ' ~i!Ii'" ,cr~, ',;". c~ i J u~ril. ~, "'" , ",'M'" "tr<,""" ~; c, t(, 'c II IV' (,(C"~~J , c c cc Cc ,!I- ,,,,.1.., hi . ...,. it ~" ~ ~1J:!l\~ 'i'~ivc.I'f i!~~N 'fj , ",i~'" ,~r~"J <i ,~ ~- '~-' ,1!~"'M "ill -142- 'n ,~ if , 'ifll.,'\' ,1 ~t:" A~ w.". I,.;l..,,,,a.' -';-......f..,..,. r. ..... ",r. I', '... 'j:' '~" (:,,;;,. ". '''''''''')Ji!!i ~!, . ',f ';1 /,. 11" '"' .il"...,!<' " ",...,";'.) <1""'1' ,.~u,: ~, 'J '" '"I'~iV :' ."1", "I I':' I:',. ':\' "'''" I!',j '~....''.i ,1L> w....r'i1,j JW,I ~tl '1\ PROPOSED BUDGET DEBT SERVICE fUNDS -143- DEBT SERVICE FUNDS The debt service requirement for the City and the Redevelopment Agency is $17.9 million for fiscal year 2009-10. This represents an increase of approximately $600,000 from the fiscal year 2008- 09 amended budget of $17.3 million. Debt service payments are made from various City and Agency Funds in accordance with the legal documents governing each borrowing. Present debt is in the form of Certificates of Participation, Pension Obligation Bonds, long Term Notes, lease-Purchase Obligations, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, and Tax Allocation Bonds. Debt has been issued by the City to finance a wide variety of projects, including the construction of the new Public Works Center and the new Police Facility, parking facilities, refurbishment of the Chula Vista Shopping Mall, property acquisitions, building remodeling, and equipment and software acquisition. Annual debt service costs are borne primarily by the General Fund, with the exception of the Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds and the Tax Allocation Bonds, which are funded by property tax increment revenues in the Redevelopment Agency. To follow is a brief description of the debt service funds. Fund 441 -1994 Pension Obliqation Bonds The 1994 Pension Obligation Bonds in the amount of $16,786,532 were issued. to provide funds to pay - . - . the City's unfunded liability in the California Public Employees Retirement System. The bonds are a debt of the City General Fund and the City is obligated by Retirement law to make the bond payments without specification of funds. The term of the bonds is through fiscal year 2011-12. -145- Fund 442 - CDBG Section 108 Loan In June of 2007, the City received a loan of $9.5 million from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), under the Section 108 program. These funds will be repaid with a portion of the City's annual CDBG allocation, over the next 20 years. The funds will be used for the 'Castle Park Infrastructure Project'. The Section 108 loan is an 'advance' of future CDBG entitlement funds, and, as such, is repaid with a portion of the City's annual entitlement. Fund 446 - Notes Pavable Adamo A January 1994 note payable for $370,000 to Mr. and Mrs. Adamo as part of the purchase price for property located adjacent to the Civic Center. The term of the note is twenty years. Fund 448 - 2000 Certificates of Participation Series A This Certificate of Participation Series A of 2000 in the amount of $25,255,000. Certificates were issued to provide funds to improve the City's 800 MHZ emergency communication system and to construct and improve the City's Corporation Yard. The term of the Certificates is through the year 2020 Fund 449 - San Dieqo Countv Reqional Communication Systems On March 7, 2000, the Chula Vista City Council authorized the City to join the San Diego County Regional Communications Systems (RCS). The City's portion of the infrastructure is $2,809,405 plus financing costs. This is payable over a period of 14 years commencing on January 1, 2001 through January 1, 2014. Fund 450 - 2002 Certificates of Participation - Police Facility Proiect In June 2002, the Public Financing Authority issued the 2002 COP in the amount of $60,145,000 to finance the construction of the City's new Police Headquarters. The source of repayment of the certificates is the lease payments to be made by the General Fund and PFDIF to the Public Financing Authority. The term of the certificates is through the year 2032. Fund 451 - Lonq Term Advances DSF - City This fund was established to account for inter fund loans. Fund 452 - Capital Leases - Fire Equipment This fund was established to account for the lease/purchase of the Fire Department's equipment. -146- . _"'--_L' ~ ~ ~... ,-- )~~--:-: tJill' = 1 ~,-,"",,; - ,- :; -^ . -:- -.' "~:, ~ - - '. - , '''r;:; < ,- '. -:; - ~... p . it":;... ^- .-;-1 ~,,;c>'S":;o: \G;I:1F~JFc!w)'N@" , :,",; , ':._~ ~;~,',~, 'i'.. ~', :~. '--, }, :-. "4~4f))' _ _~ "'-,......-___...,.-'...;;...J;.......~~_ _"'-'- ~_9.. ,,-...__t~~_ ~___"" _ ..__ h:JtflJ:.:..___.. _M~':" ~J!_..., . 1 -:.. FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services 2,475 2,475 Other Expenses 3,203,341 3,344,377 Transfers Out 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,205,816 $3,346,852 $9,062,247 $9,553,722 REVENUES Use of Money & Property 60 8 Transfers In 2,724,679 3,855,348 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $2,724,739 $3,855,356 $3,862,247 $9,561,256 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 441 1994 Pension Obligation Bond 2,272,435 2,371,755 442 COBG Section 108 Loan 0 0 446 Notes Payable Adamo Property 44,030 45,351 449 SO Co Regional Comm Systems 295,734 295,734 451 Long-term Advances OSF - City 593,617 634,012 452 KS Fire Equipment Capital Lease 0 0 453 CES Loan Repayment 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,205,816 $3,346,852 $9,062,247 $9,553,722 REVENUES 441 1994 Pension Obligation Bond 2,272,515 2,371,725 442 COBG Section 108 Loan 0 0 446 Notes Payable Adamo Property 44,030 45,351 449 SO Co Regional Comm Systems 295,739 295,742 451 Long-term Advances OSF - City 112,455 1,142,538 452 KS Fire Equipment Capital Lease 0 0 453 CES Loan Repayment 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES $2,724,739 $3,855,356 $3,862,247 $9,561,256 -148- FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services 17,679 18,650 Other Expenses 10,694,160 11,925,586 Transfers Out 0 1,102,129 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $10,711,839 $13,046,365 $10,541,047 $10,528,350 REVENUES Use of Money & Property 613,854 579,477 Transfers In 9,500,218 9,904,895 ESTIMA TED TOTAL REVENUES $10,114,072 $10,484,372 $10,441,083 $10,412,178 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 448 2000 COP Ser A-Fin Project 450 2002 COP Police Facility Proj 471 2003 Refunding Cert of Part 472 2004 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase I 473 2006 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase 2 TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 448 2000 COP Ser A-Fin Project 450 2002 COP Police Facility Proj 471 2003 Refunding Cert of Part 472 2004 COP Civ elr Proj Phase I 473 2006 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase 2 TOTAL REVENUES 2,124,500 3,913,746 1,468,901 2,399,965 804,727 $10,711,839 2,190,904 4,034,827 1,480,436 2,366,413 41,492 $10,114,072 -149- 2,125,672 5,948,220 1,300,375 2,394,402 1,277,696 $13,046,365 2,061,767 3,916,299 1,353,417 2,266,773 886,116 $10,484,372 $10,541,047 $10,528,350 $10,441,083 $10,412,178 -150- p o G E T R OTHER p o s D E fUNDS -151- B u D OTHER FUNDS The funds included in this section include miscellaneous Special Revenue and Internal Service funds. Special Revenue Funds are used to account for proceeds derived from specific revenue sources, which are legally restricted to expenditures for special purposes. Internal Service Funds are used to finance and account for goods, special activities, and services performed by one City department for other City departments on a cost reimbursement basis. Internal Service Funds account for the activities of centralized vehicle and equipment maintenance, worker's compensation, insurance, and technology replacement. To follow is a brief description of special revenue funds. TRANSPORTATION FUNDS Included in this group are the following funds: Fund 221 - Gas Tax This fund accounts for the receipt and expenditure of all monies received from the State under Street and Highway Code Sections 2106, 2107, 2107.5. The allocations must be spent for street maintenance or construction and a limited amount for engineering. Historically, these monies were deemed highly restrictive insofar as expenditure, but with adoption of AS 1502 effective January 1, 1978 most of the money can be used for any street purpose. In the past the total revenue received has been expended on a 50-50 basis, i.e. about one-half of the money for road construction and the other half for maintenance. While such a policy is desirable, greater utilization of the fund for street maintenance and other street related operation costs is possible. -153- Fund 225 - Traffic Siqnal Fee This fund accounts for the receipt and expenditure of fees collected from private developers for financing and / or installation of new traffic signals, as required by City of Chula Vista Council Policy 478-01 Fund 227 - Transportation Sales Tax This fund was established to account for the receipt and disbursement of all transportation sales tax (TransNet) revenues for the City. In November 1987, San Diego County voters first approved the Transportation Program (TransNet). In November of 2004, voters approved a 40-year extension of the program, which funds transportation improvements throughout the region via a half-cent local sales tax. The City's allocation of regional funds is based upon population and the number of local street and road miles maintained by the City. PARKING FUNDS Included as part of this group are the following funds: Fund 241 - Parkinq Meter Parking Meter Fund revenues are generated through two sources: coin deposits from parking meters located in the downtown area, and parking citation payments for expired meter violations. These funds pay for the coin collection and maintenance of the meters, the parking enforcement staff that monitors the downtown area, and general upkeep and signage of the downtown parking Jots. Fund 243 - Town Centre I Parkinq This fund is used to account for revenues from an in-lieu parking fee. This in-lieu parking fee applies to any developer of a new commercial building or addition to an existing commercial building within the Downtown Parking District. Use of monies in this fund is restricted to the purchase or development of parking sites. -154- PUBLIC SAFETY FUNDS Included in this group are the following funds. Fund 245 - Traffic Safety This fund is a depository for all monies derived from vehicle code fines, excluding parking violations. The fines are collected through the County court system and remitted to the City monthly. These monies may be expended only for traffic control devices and equipment and maintenance thereof or for the maintenance, improvement or construction of public streets. Fund 251 - Supplemental Law Enforcement Services This fund accounts for the Supplemental Law Enforcement grant funds awarded to the Police Department; these funds can be used to supplement general fund appropriations for Police related personnel, overtime, and equipment expenditures. Fund 252 - Police Department Grants This fund includes the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) and miscellaneous police grants. CBAG is funded with federal funds. While CBAG employees are technically City of Chula Vista employees they do not work in the City of Chula Vista nor do they provide direct services for the City of Chula Vista; the City serves only as a fiscal agent for CBAG. Fund 253 - Inmate Welfare Fund This fund is a depository for monies collected from pay phones commissions and operation of a commissary, in accordance with the Sheriffs Penal Code section 4025. Monies in this fund shall be expended for the benefit, education, and welfare of the inmates. Fund 254 - Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds This fund accounts for federal Justice Assistance Grant funds awarded to the Police Department; these funds can be used to supplement general fund appropriations for Police related personnel, overtime, and equipment expenditures. Fund 256 - Asset Seizure This fund is a depository for assets seized under Federal statutes through the process of "equitable sharing" of drug money and real property. By law these funds may only be used for law enforcement purposes and are intended to supplement, not supplant, existing funds -155- L1SRARy/CUL TURAL ARTS FUNDS Included in this group are the following funds: Fund 261 - California Librarv Service Act The California Library Services Act (CLSA) helps public libraries provide coordinated reference services and provides reimbursement for interlibrary loans of materials and loans to nonresident borrowers through the Transaction Based Reimbursement program, also known as the Direct Loan program. The Chula Vista Public Library participates in the Universal Borrowing provision of CLSA that reimburses the City for any over-the-counter loan service to the residents of all other California public library jurisdictions (Direct Loan). The Interlibrary Loan program reimburses the City for handling costs when books are lent to other California libraries. Fund 262 - Public Librarv Foundation Fund The Public Library Foundation Act (PLF) is a funding formula under which the State contributes funding for basic local library services, under specified conditions, to assure the availability to every resident of the state an adequate level of public library service regardless of the taxable wealth of the local jurisdiction providing the service. The legislation provides that to every library jurisdiction which allocates to its public library at least as much local funding as it had the previous year, the state will award a dollar amount equal to the proportional share of the total amount allocated for the Public Library Foundation program based on the population of the library's service area as certified by the State Librarian for that fiscal year. The annual funding is dependent upon appropriations made by the legislature and the Governor. Fund 267 - McCandliss Awards The Gayle McCandliss Fund was established in 1991 shortly after she passed away Consistent with her wishes, it was established as a perpetual fund to recognize and provide monetary support or recognition to individuals or groups who make substantial contribution to the arts in the City of Chula Vista. -156- SUNDRY GRANT FUNDS Included as part of this group are the following funds Fund 268 - State Recreation Grants This fund was established to account for the receipt and disbursement of all State Recreation Grants received by the City. Fund 272 - Federal Grants Fund This fund was established to account for the receipt and disbursement of all Federal Grants received by the City. Fund 273 - State Grants Fund This fund was established to account for the receipt and disbursement of all State Grants received by the City (excluding Recreation related grants). ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND CONSERVATION FUNDS Included as part of this group are the following funds: Fund 281 - Waste Manaqement and Recvclinq Revenue for the Waste Management fund is generated by a variety of grants which are used to implement, operate and educate the public on waste diversion, recycling, environmental actions and impacts. Current grant programs include litter reduction and bottle and can recycling programs; a regional used motor oil and oil filter recycling program; regional household hazardous waste program, regional universal waste program, and a regional needles and sharps disposal program. Fund 282 - Environmental Services The Environmental Services fund is a depository for revenue that is generated primarily by a 5% surcharge (AB 9~9 fees) applied to the refuse rates for residential and commercial customers. The surcharge is authorized by the State to recover the costs of developing and implementing source reduction, recycling, and composting programs that are implemented to meet the State mandate to divert 50% of all waste generated annually in the City from landfills. The fund also includes two annual flat fees paid by the franchise hauler under the -157- franchise agreement to cover litter container costs and to support the programs public education and enforcement service costs. Fund 285 - Enerqy Conservation Fund Revenue for the Energy Conservation fund is generated by grants and inter-agency agreements for specific energy conservation projects. For fiscal year 2008-2009, the energy conservation fund reflects the budget for the SDG&E energy conservation grant. This grant funds energy conservation programs for local residents, businesses, and City operations that reduce the amount of natural gas and electricity consumed. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS These funds are depositories of grant entitlement monies received from the Department of Housing and Urban Development including funds 311, 312, 314, 321, 323, and 325. The purpose of these monies is for community development projects; eligible activities include those that: Benefit low and moderate income people. Eliminate slums and blight. Alleviate conditions posing a serious health and/or safety hazard. OPEN SPACE DISTRICT FUNDS These funds are a depository for all monies received for all flat rate property tax assessments levied against benefiting property owners for all maintenance of open space areas. Included in this group are funds 342 through 389. The total assessment amount for each Open Space District is calculated each year based upon the cost of providing services within the district. This assessment rate is limited to the prior year's amount, increased by the lesser of two local indexes. In recent years the indexed increases were not effectively keeping pace with the actual costs of providing these services to the property owners. In fiscal year 2007-08 staff went through the Proposition 218 process on seven districts/zones, in order to bring revenues in line with actual maintenance costs. Only one of the seven districts was approved for an increase in assessment. As a result a concentrated effort has been made to reduce expenditures to within available resources. -158- STORM DRAIN FUND Fund 301 - Storm Drain Revenue Storm Drain Revenue Fund is a depository for all monies collected from the monthly storm drain service charge, in accordance with Chapter 14.16 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Monies in this fund may be used for storm drain purposes. To follow is a brief description of the internal service funds. Fund 231 - Workers Compensation This fund is a depository for contributions made from the General Fund to pay for annual costs related to workers' compensation liabilities including the provision of an appropriate reserve to pay uninsured claims costs. The City is self-insured for amounts up to $1.0 million per claim. The amount of the reserve and the required annual transfer is determined by the Director of Finance, based on experience and consultation with the Risk Manager. Fund 341 Public Liability Trust Fund This fund is a depository for contributions made from the General Fund to provide an appropriate reserve level to pay for uninsured and deductibles for public liability losses. The City is self-insured for amounts up to $250,000 per claim. Fund 232 Flexible SpendinQ Account This fund is used to account for employee health, medical, and dependent care benefits. Fund 393 TechnoloQY Replacement Fund The Technology Replacement Fund is an internal service function that provides for the replacement of computers and related technology equipment. Funds from departments' operating budgets are transferred to the Technology Replacement Fund for future replacement of equipment included in the program. Due to economic reasons, the program will not be funded in fiscal year 2009-10 and the remaining fund balance will be transferred to the General Fund. -159- -160- ;-..':".......-\-~..~I'."'~..,::"O:l_r--:--~_-.I_ 'l;-~'-' -'l-;'~":-~ ,- f ;'-.:~,"~', ~=--~.~';~--'l l~lIPR:~I\i\I.~P~~tf~i{lIOIN,.F.:ij'I~HP,~.'. .' :.; ~"." '--:: <" ~ ...-"0..' .';22'{['^j FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Other Expenses 95,888 50,630 Transfers Out 4,176,440 3,845,436 CIP Project Expenditures 4,152,682 9,491,394 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $8,425,010 $13,387,460 $8,411,992 $16,864,504 REVENUES Other Local Taxes 3,210,000 9,171,000 Use of Money & Property 875,065 1,082,504 Revenue from Other Agencies 4,143,108 4,275,361 Charges for Services 683,742 499,457 Other Revenue 11,517 1,351 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $8,923,432 $15,029,673 $9,270,957 $15,820,371 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 221 Gas Tax 4,972,162 3,960,816 222 Federal Aid to Urban 0 0 225 Traffic Signal 1,138,015 526,367 226 CMAQlTraffic Signal 0 0 227 Transportation Sales Tax 2,314,833 8,900,277 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $8,425,010 $13,387,460 $8,411,992 $16,864,504 REVENUES 221 Gas Tax 4,115,294 4,038,599 222 Federal Aid to Urban 0 0 225 Traffic Signal 962,199 935,592 226 CMAQ/Traffic Signal 105 0 227 Transportation Sales Tax 3,845,834 10,055,482 TOTAL REVENUES $8,923,432 $15,029,673 $9,270,957 $15,820,371 .161. \'<-,~I?~R1~lti~J"~i'I~101Sl~<---";: .-:>.- -.:~~--~ ;':",l~" ','~~,,-i:- <2r470:'1 .~.) -.:__-~__:..-.L..::...'.~_ ~--~--~..._~-- --_~ _~~~_,_",,,,___ ;..:_ ~....;__.. _ "-_ _'A: _I FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services 18,938 25,649 Supplies and Services 17,079 18,032 Other Expenses 266,725 270,704 Utilities 16,697 16,425 Transfers Out 2,264 1,358 CIP Project Expenditures 0 168 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $321,703 $332,336 $566,276 $539,731 REVENUES Licenses and Permits 24,729 23,209 Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties 60,047 73,339 Use of Money & Property 246,909 249,662 Other Revenue 0 16,160 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $331,685 $362,370 $361,772 $568,126 -. EXPENDITURES 241 Parking Meter 243 Town Centre I-Parking District TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 241 Parking Meter 243 Town Centre I-Parking District TOTAL REVENUES 321,703 o $321,703 332,168 168 $332,336 330,336 1,349 $331,685 344,338 18,032 $362,370 -162- FUND DETAIL $566,276 $539,731 $361,772 $568,126 F';:'p--~-"'iR~1i~"-I'~- ~> :-'-IF'~IU" I~- "f)--;~z,- -.' .. ',~" ~ ~ ,b",. ,,' ~f' ': .l-- -~'.;'. :; -~: - :y,~ . ~ :':4.2c-.~rQ-C:-~~ 1.....1 1 '~I ,I ' ., I :l~.;>"".. >',. . V" ~,~ t ~ ~' , . t , ~ It... . . " .... ~ '" ""~, v""" 0 . . ,...".,~\ .. ,,~ '- , .. -,.-_.: ,'7'>.-.... ,~-"-_ .1 , -~--".;; . ~ ~""".~~-~. __ .~- ___ ___~~ ~ -....... "'",'''_.....* .....'- :;;'_-E: STAFFING SUMMARY - 241 ,163- "j.t\@!j~i~J ~$~l~trr'~:;~l~~~~ ',:~ ~~ij.:.-~' ....~ ~ '. >:'. .:~ '_. ~,n', :;.~~)5',0U FUND SUMtv1ARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services 3,407 2,178,126 Supplies and Services 102,725 193,364 Other Expenses 3,913 425,878 Capital 49,654 64,215 Transfers Out 866,885 673,134 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,026,584 $3,534,717 $5,458,196 $4,330,902 REVENUES Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties 842,214 1,056,790 Use of Money & Property 36,079 71,684 Revenue from Other Agencies 426,010 3,132,638 Other Revenue 100,000 0 Transfers In 0 0 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $1,404,303 $4,261,112 $5,409,337 $4,510,845 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 245 Traffic Safety 251 Suppllaw Enforcement Services 252 Police Department Grants 253 Inmate Welfare Fund 254 local law Enf Block Grant 256 Asset Seizure TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 245 Traffic Safety 251 Suppllaw Enforcement Services 252 Police Department Grants 253 Inmate Welfare Fund 254 local law Enf Block Grant 256 Asset Seizure TOTAL REVENUES 513,600 o 93,725 o 65,974 353,285 $1,026,584 850,150 22,839 192,975 o 101,467 236,872 $1,404,303 597,402 425,574 2,255,516 o 117,235 138,990 $3,534,717 1,087,362 471,215 2,191,828 o 89,974 420,733 $4,261,112 $5,458,196 $4,330,902 $5,409,337 $4,510,845 .164. rn q~ -. --, ': ---.zc -, c, '-~ --:',-'. -. ~--.-- - - -- ---'" - '. _n - - ',.;' - - v-a r ~ ';P',l.J.B;blI'€~ Si\ilH;iEr':lFi~J~iJ!I2):" -', ' . ',:. ""'" ' ','~' 'I. - ", '-'t:: : ~5{(i)1 .,..__t :-r""'__"-_'1:..::_--.::.~~_"-=--.:L=___"'l...,,,..z. ~ ~_...:......~~...:.:...~_" ~ ~ __ ._~.!- ... ",u.._->-- __ _,,)1:':....-----2.=.'-1 _ STAFFING SUtvllv\ARY - 2,52 CBAG Administrative Analyst II CBAG Analyst CBAG Budget Manager CBAG Deputy Executive Director CBAG Director of SD LECC CBAG Executive Assistant CBAG Executive Director CBAG Graphic Designer/Webmaster CBAG Lead Programmer Analyst CBAG Management Assistant CBAG Meth Strike Force Coordinator CBAG Micro Computer Specialist CBAG Network Administrator 1111 CBAG Network Manager CBAG Program Analyst CBAG Program Manager CBAG RCFL Network Engineer Peace Officer Police Community Relations Specialist Police Training and Development Supervisor Public Information Officer (PD) Public 1.00 3.00 100 1.00 100 1.00 100 100 1.00 100 (1.00) (100) 1.00 2.00 1.00 100 2.00 1.00 100 100 1.00 -165- , 't'BR~R~jtClti]tif"t.iRNlfiRTS i~liJN:D:" ':. 2'6:01"1 -" _ _ _ _ ~ ... . ~ :i[~.. __ _ _ _ _ _ ~ , FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Revenue from Other Agencies Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 9,252 8,294 1,200 199,124 o $217 ,870 o 2,100 o 31,110 o $33,210 17,088 388,230 900 $406,218 22,049 91,215 o $113,264 I' "'1!'-, '~~:"'"ilr<:;f'llT~~''''''~'':l; "':"'~r""";'~"l:""~'~'l'?W'.':M:!1 .!<" -'J '~1; iI:,l;..ij.'" 0' "k,',! 'I ;".'1 i lifljlf" ". 0.' :'i~iU.,..Ili..ill,Jt".;;:.J_._ 14 :k""""".J_J1:1lL.iilJ1.,,!':....~ . i1:i7:f~~;!:]I~f'4;9~9~;;I'~~_i,~;~;rJooml:!~i;~Q.9jJ1 f1)!::;;!~:rjiD2~;i;~'6~p;~t1il!E,!;;..;:'~il~q~r?:QQJ~ ~mr25 ooQ;lF?~:~j,J1F25,OOO:~ ,..;:u.,.-,~.~,*lm1..,.~. "~.m''"'':''_.:jJ _, , -^',t;._~JilIu;;:.,,',_,__. ,. ,_"........."""" 8ijK:;::~t!f:Tg,?,;,:'~1~f:;;uU:,!;;CllJIQ,?I~i1ij~; $129,244 $129,244 ~;:;::~~~t:w~:;6.i;?W~~i~F;tt;j'>.;:,!!f'5Jil t,!,;; ,)..:,J~~;;.'t.m;'jI11....~;':! ,"'.. ,,:l-J~Ill,'IJiL.,&.;!I..!JI..Y,.it!1 Jji,!~:::,'~'i,],TI;~j~~4:;;,Q9:Q]!~iim!@r!!mmltb',$,1QQ:~i':r;: ~--"':-l"' r -_."-:]".=~'.",.I.'l1'''".. "-'J [,';~::~~~t!r;'l':;:;Lll J':'lhti ~ OO"j ~i"r,;;.' _i;:l:~~ll.'.'i(: 900 ;j' ,,>l<.=~ l;.'~L."........... ....,1_""1;i"'-'1_'...'1lt;;..,;,.....-...l $134,900 $105,900 ~..."""""'-"."~,,.-"""),!'7".........".."...''"If'":tMr;;0;~~':wwmr~;;~~I~'<<1~;,~!"'li,:;;;lr;-$>-""~~7':~'~""'$"""''''I~'''-'~T"';;:rJ''''''''~''''~!;;)T'-m-j''~)C''tf:i NElilF,UND,AC1JyrIY'j,,,I,:.j "',i"II'",,,,,,1!,.,, ':',').""1:"1' "",'.1, 18.8,,3481''''1''';' f,J'" 80,054, ,', ',,', "'11..,$5,656':""""11',,:,:,,($.2.3,344),' il.lj,"'4;"j"",L~"~''''"",,,,,"~'ii,,r:ld,,,.,,I,,;,,<,;I,~I.; :ilJ,j",.., .,..",fillil J;1>".""""lJuc:f,,,,,~,;;,,,... 1"1~"",,,,,,,'~,k.,,,.,,,lw ~""_""'A,~ti","lU"'-M,."L",lll...."...ll""",,_,~ \"'''''''''''__,,,,,~1i.l1,,,..1),,,,;, .1~.1,.;,~,;"",,,'1,,~i>i;l.l;,,,,,,,--,, FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 261 California Library Service Act 88,216 29,110 262 Public Library Act 128,454 2,000 265 CA Dept of Education Sect. 321 0 0 267 McCandliss Cultural Arts 1,200 2,100 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $217 ,.870 $33,210 REVENUES 261 California Library Service Act 272,320 112,653 262 Public Library Act 130,301 (188) 265 CA Dept of Education Sect. 321 1,875 0 267 McCandliss Cultural Arts 1,722 799 TOTAL REVENUES $406,218 $113,264 '::i:'-;-;":;:!~;~P1-:'''m^^':~6"4-'~''~~! P';)j;P":'1~f~' ,"" '~"'!~"""")~Ti:'!_ !..Lt.]',,-: 2~.~"",,.,, "1:11~,644," ~1n::r:~'J7'l?l!'f<f!:~cfPI:?,+.;~.t'i'~fP~i?f""'lrl~"",:r0'rn ~i!I;,;:;i .:j;;;J!;liHl!'!~:b1L~11,~"li. J'L:;;!jj;,ji"!;;i;:~:itbil~~,',,,;,:;f: f}"''''''i'I;Dr'm'"--,,--,,,,''''''~'~'''' - ''''^'''''''lli~r''i'~--';; '--;;',; r"w'''''' LJb:~;ill~i:~'i!gffJt~~9jjm1;~!~iJ!~'M~m~~I@:g~i; t,,,~.;r:;rn 1'60QllI"ll'" 'j' '11 60Q"l'l 1~,L:;:U~;~I!ilJ~L:,,,',,,,...,,~!/;H,:LI.,lll'li!;:tll:i);"!,,,,,,!,~Jli11 $129,244 $129,244 $134,900 $105,900 rNET':F'U'N'D~AC'TrI'\iffy~!rm:~i;t'I:),r;I;J;~!lWjl;;~tj::F9;F!!:!:~!i'\:r~F:'1,',~:i;"~"$'1"88;'348'!I~:~IK......_';,':;~;$"8"(i: .054\~i;I},:,:'~::;ijt'~'$5~'Er56:'i!r~':i;i:;~!~i1'~'$'23t"'3t4'4' !lI..I.Wl~i;liI.~W':jI;Jl.4~!;..;:A:~..;jI,u;J~J.;l! ",I t ,I ,,:;jIW~l<.;.~..~:~~..L")\ '''<>'1,,,;~~~~,,..,,,,",,,'jld!' :'~Aiit.LIIt<:<~",~j -166- - -.. ~- -It . ---~. -,--.. -..- - - ~- -,... -, - - -- 'tJ'-- -- ------:1 ' ~: ~S~tJ;~!~:R:M. r(]It'A.lShiliS, JEi(U11SI:ID' ' , ",';;, '. ~ .' ". :--' , '. ':" " 2'c~(}q ~~__ __o,_"::_~ - ~_~ __-3_ ... -.. - ~~_- ,~_ _-__ ___ \'_... _--'-~ .... ,_;:i _ ~~_<"'_ _'.. _, ~_ ___. FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services 0 145,684 Supplies and Services 143.801 180,895 Other Expenses 230,665 0 Capital 45,346 24.085 CIP Project Expenditures 975,547 761,373 Non-CIP Project Expenditures 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,395,359 $1,112,037 $385,807 $1,248,297 REVENUES Use of Money & Property (37) 0 Revenue from Other Agencies 454,093 1,580,342 Other Revenue 0 23,824 Transfers In 0 13,672 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $454,056 $1,617 ,838 $983,717 $1,388,297 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 268 State Recreation Grants 975,547 533,113 272 Federal Grants Fund 174,906 220,370 273 State Grants Fund 244,906 358,554 274 ARRA Fund 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,395,359 $1,112,037 $385,807 $1,248,297 REVENUES 268 State Recreation Grants 147,442 939,891 272 Federal Grants Fund 129,560 251,629 273 State Grants Fund 177,054 426,318 274 ARRA Fund 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES $454,056 $1,617,838 , $983,717 $1,388,297 , .167. ~~ ---",~- ,-,'~ -- \;:.1: -",,' - ~,. -' - ;~ '0 - ~ .' '~-" My -"4. '~--""-:<-f. -;--"J .,' ~,t)'NSiI?RM;4~I'O'lNl;f;ItJ:I'N;I};', :~',' . " ',,' :',":' . ;. :,.. '., 2;80~' -".i~....:-____ _~~ _ _1 _'-'<1.'"'_ _". ",,__.' J~ __~,_ ..:__ '~___.:..____ '_'~ .-:\ ~ ~_~,-.'{4' '_ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services 93.985 126,931 Supplies and Services 277,447 567,510 Other Expenses 15,559 302,748 Utilities 0 782 Transfers Out 0 0 CIP Project Expenditures 51.909 302,522 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $438,900 $1,300,493 $3,433,396 $2,028,733 REVENUES Use of Money & Property 1.387 0 Revenue from Other Agencies 167.536 1,244,507 Charges for Services 0 0 Other Revenue 0 5.029 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $168,923 $1,249,536 $3,438,427 $2,119,170 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 281 Waste Management & Recycling 225.291 295.672 282 Environmental Services Fund 0 0 285 Energy Conservation 213,609 1,004,821 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $438,900 $1,300,493 $3,433,396 $2,028,733 REVENUES 281 Waste Management & Recycling (42,697) 314,342 282 Environmental Services Fund 0 0 285 Energy Conservation 211,620 935.194 TOTAL REVENUES $168,923 $1,249,536 $3,438,427 $2,119,170 .168. : rt@NSERVA1f!IONiH:j'j~J;Dc ,-, - -.' '. 260' I - - - ~ - .. - ~ - - ~ - -~ -- - ~. - - ~ - ~""- STAFFING SUMMARY - 282 Environmental Services Program Manager Recycling Specialist 1/11 2.00 ~~~~~~,.. .. "U ;;. Q . -~. . .. It a a 0 ,+-:i-3*J$k;:';;"/,'('L:::;,'~':;H;;'!":i4:l~/ f I ,,-,.. .C'_ '""_,_",, .. .., ,'" ""',, _. .0." ..0._ "':__ .. ',.__' ';_'0' ....,_,.,. .... '.' ._ .0 ...__._.___+.~..__'i<t:__""",_..~""._,_.__.,_:;::_:_:_~'.3f.-_JJ!>-.-._:.'.__..._.:.:-'"" ...... .:.,." ......, 100 ...'.""''''''f'''....,~: ' "~"""--".-';hi'"HJ'iI<--\.-_-L_..._"'.".--"'-.-i~:-.r'".-,','j, I 'I" ,:':x.... '.),',:,:"';":':"':P'ii:"Jj;,_",."':,,':C,:.iH!tu,, i'_::',!f:g:V"':!':':o/~'7""" .. ..;.;,',\; '"" ..-.... ''''''/ ., ". i~ 'h'.;':;I,j1::9.P;:;:i::l 'f~"'':',-::~,~''''~'''''"~'- . ';';"'i!ii:,;"',"..9..9,p,,,,,!JH ':f~"_] >,;"'Z'j:{fl1"1'x_,, _ _ ,';i:,';< .169. ::i~m~~"17~~:!i~:i:~;;~,~~~~~~~~' ~.~ ~~/1' : ~.:~ ~ .: .~ j'~ ;'~_,_i~j~ l FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services 185,353 284,711 Other Expenses 0 0 Utilities 2,266 481 Transfers Out 311,837 269,801 CIP Project Expenditures 0 82,202 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $499,456 $637,195 $549,998 $548,118 REVENUES Licenses and Permits 115,163 47,303 Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties 9,300 21,700 Use of Money & Property (1,095) 1,268 Charges for Services 548,360 570,070 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $671,728 $640,341 $580,660 $525,000 .170. FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services 14,242 14,850 Other Expenses 467,205 1,447,829 Capital 0 0 Transfers Out 9,501 0 CIP Project Expenditures 1,288,716 2,296,347 Non-CIP Project Expenditures 772,753 926,415 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,552,417 $4,685,441 $4,443,842 $3,970,965 REVENUES Use of Money & Property 10,611 16,714 Revenue from Other Agencies 4,206,564 4,354,211 Other Revenue 1,053 9,508,942 Transfers In 304,534 0 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $4,522,762 $13,879,867 $4,676,546 $3,870,965 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 311 COBG Housing Program 1,124 0 312 Job Hsg Sal Incentive Grt Prog 1,053 0 314 Emergency Shelter Grant Prog 86,318 87,833 321 Home Program 204,696 1,313,237 323 COSG Sec 108 Loan Fund 0 0 325 COSG Program - Income Projects 8,377 0 333 FY2000 Comm Oev Slock Grant 2,250,849 3,284,371 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,552,417 $4,685,441 $4,443,842 $3,970,965 REVENUES 311 COSG Housing Program 30,142 1,010 3,12 Job Hsg Ballncentive Grt Prog 9,190 0 314 Emergency Shelter Grant Prog 90,458 87,833 321 Home Program 2,289,126 1,325,882 323 COBG Sec 108 Loan Fund 0 0 325 COBG Program - Income Projects (1,322) 11,299 333 FY2000 Comm Oev Block Grant 2,105,168 12,453,843 TOTAL REVENUES $4,522,762 $13,879,867 $4,676,546 $3,870,965 .171. ~ > I(::OMM;i),E~/'BliaCK:tl)~~i:ts!f;ili!Nri '-;(' -- -- >,'~, '3,~,,~: 1 ~ -- -~ ~ - ....... - - - -,- --- - - -.. - - .~ - - -- - - -- - - - --" ..... r,''',......,,,...t-:. "'''.........-'''1::-..'1".,......",.,''..,.'''..... ''''::'''''''-r:;-:''11r '....,...W:w.'.;1~:'..,......,!lj "-:0- "'''-:-1''-' ,,..,,,-..' .-. -"T'~.-,-:; "-'" "IT-,..~..._"-,,,...~."!":~-..,>~~.o/.., .'- ," , '~''''''~r-:>''''.';o-:-'' '''<1'-,,...= ".- E '~ET:FUND)~:CTl\I,IT.Y,m:: :"', Ii,: ":Ii{,::!:,.j~:,:,, IV "'1.$1',970,345 ":i'.:,$9:19~A26 ': I,',.jl $232,704.1""'1;" '($100,900) 1.,..............;...;'1,""., j...,,;..~..."--..;...n,_ ,..ilfi-.l.._.. ~. .--........._;8,._....<o..."'u_..rl:... .., "'""',iI _""'___"~ ....._.:,. 4...... ......l_,"'-_.....'''''..-'"_.....'-'.,,..Iil_ .Il........ _..k.n,~.... ."" ." "...c.:..I...,".,.,;:,.;'.-"''-_-'-''..:t.._.... .,,,,0, -172- OPI:,~, SPACE DIStRfCi'FtJ,N'D ' "': -'..' 3'5'(;),-: t_ ._ . . ,. _ '..~ ... ... _ . d "n" _. . _... _ .__ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses Utilities TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 3,464,643 1,468,207 1,238,310 $6,171,160 483,662 7,022,578 $7,506,240 4,668,459 1,565,557 1,434,055 $7,668,071 552,998 7,571,093 $8,124,091 ..;~ ::t'--'-"'1."I".'7":'."~'-'-"~"~"~''''''1 L~Ji~.,:'l.i?,g, .9,?.J1.~:llit~':I:,2,~lg~~~,:1 jinTIP1,;,1' 80G'AT6'ii":,ji"HI183S"435UTI J~:;'<l.iii."''''"''''-;'!;I>.:"",''''''':!i,;.;:;'~,,,,..................,..:ill FT~,~.' "iT7-'-'-""'--~1 ~~~:..-t'-.- ""--f!] ,:)~i!',;",?,',1,~,2,Q;?,,~li~~:.:;i;d.,g; ~,~...~:J~"qg.L11 $10,475,403 $11,866,649 "... ~'<W-"r,r -. ~ ,"'~. ,. 'r "'/!!:'.. -- ~ pi, (} ;";r;~;'~ ~t,!~!','t,t'i:1, 0' 'If ,tl~'i" :F,;:.lll ',:f'; O:~ ;"..1,_",..""., """l_l""h""l_l. "...,.....r..Li;.!4,J. ..,.,,14......... .n-rim..... '..;.1....."'~T""'''..llri, ;>.~!W..'i."'. " ....R7".'" "'1j~ L4ci!;lQ.,.:\ZMQ}JIlL..'dJ"lL62&;I~,;J $10,475,403 $11,866,649 1~'W)'_,,:""m"'''',/w':'(;'''~r''B'~'', ""'~--"Tm~'l"'":"'"'lI'1j1i'1I\'f'rn!:":r.~j:fW,~'''1'~!~!:''~':'''1'"''f''''''':~t........'u~'l!""'ft~<-::~!':....:-r...,."'{'~' "f',...."ww~~,~'~'7:"')t'"..~'~f'1,~'~"T..,"lr~::;rI."{,l 'j-:' ,!r:nII"I~,",..~t!'i ;,~ E.J:!~, ~ N D.!/~ ~T!yrr.'f.r':1:,;;~;!:~t~:!g'~~,rtr,lni!r:?::'} ":;'~.I~',}!r'?l;I,~lt$Jf, ~~~l Q80 iL, ii "'!'~.",,~.~q.6i029,'I~lfi'" ~ '::'~~'i:~~i;:;f:'nll;11~'r $Oil;:;H:';~I: r4tJ h' I' ,1.$0", ,~".I.lJ;,,,j,,J,,,,,,,,[,,,,--,,,':'::J/U/'Ml;,,,,,",,Il.alUlI~.,_..ljM,,.,".,,.,~liill:..'jl.,!L~[""J;"""_I'_',';",v....~._dit.",,~,,~_l.,["..",,.;cl!bh~~"..,..:;;..;n;~;~, ....-ll.>'Jm!ilLd;.,.I;;u.."",..,i::ll..J,:ti;',~;~ll>lJ""',,,..;:.;;1;,!,;;,.I...IU'"'n~ ",:';';.Jl:.;,,;l FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 342 CFD 11.M RHR McMillin 343 CFD 12-M Vlg7 344 CFD 13.M Vlg2 345 CFD 12M - OR Village 7 351 Town Centre Landscaping Dist I 352 Bay Blvd Landscaping Dist 353 Eastlake Maintenance Dist #1 354 Open Space District #1 355 Open Space District #2 356 Open Space District #3 357 Open Space District #4 358 Open Space District #5 359 Open Space District #6 361 Open Space District #7 362 Open Space District #8 363 Open Space District #9 364 Open Space District #1 0 365 Open Space District #11 366 Open Space District #13 367 Open Space District #14 368 Open Space District #15 369 Open Space District #17 28,740 3,360 o 3,360 o 9,063 204,123 53,502 11,664 57,928 69,614 29,269 17,633 17,236 57,025 60,055 69,822 113,392 o 262,580 13,190 3,652 -173. 49,986 150,941 4,914 3,425 o 8,876 230,763 56,507 12,435 48,469 67,409 31,044 21,294 14,417 59,325 53,128 70,766 129,251 o 291,051 13,287 2,849 "::"~ili,.' :"'''5'''6'17'"'4''',:, ""',""'... '1'1"0"""6'''0'8''1111 il-3k:;j!,(,:,t;Ei.L.",;:.:tlli:.1~;\~jJ!E; ;~.....i......, .1' 1"'t"":-r-:r'l'"';":;I";"'''~p'-'''''''l~'-~--' '''''ilill-: 4114;000-;"" - ,"'''';1-'''482';790'1-1 "."'l,......,,.-,,'.... "'d',"","'''~''''"'',;".;,,,IJI.',;'',,.-.-','..,'''''.''H.-';-',,;,,~;fi. ~Ttl[r',~U,,'ii~:':"'F~' ...... " 'U'""'tJ ":~:r:"'TI);i;}\(":I!'..:... n""~...!t';~ Ij";( ~i,.,.:fti":' i,l 1105,0: ''jI'!''iff,,;' 1';' ii~'~1 4; 2,,17), 1 !t.l~..."",......" , , 1u;l;""'.....:.J<..;;i~~'-'--,:..;...;.;..j. 1:~lli!2im~iji!zjz.;'~,~_~IIr;fmMmiT:I~:?I,?l?Id:1 UU:~F;j!1:';\f.iljfk:~;'.w'Cj'~j~ili~.7t~~'Wl~;f Ql:ia,:o'1 ."L;l"ih,,"".d.,illt;~lt,....;..,!lm,,6L..;.i.;J.,i '''~,..' ;.Hl1fm"!':"-r...~. _U':. .----""']i :(:'1:!f~I~I'!'r'~T,.-!".",.. _.n'im1 !,;SjMW:::dw!JH(!'~;~le~j1i:w;;;jH'jfm;d'::;'i~I~~~Z~~lliu [~"".,_.,,,.. ~..".. """jj "m~"""-'-""9EJ"~ "'I] '2311:571<'1'''1''- ,. 1'372'960"" :~:"i' j!ij........,J..'~.~,,~, ! Ii ':::,,:;a!lJ~,j""'_:!'N";" l, ~~!BEim,12i[~?,<l~~li:~!~i;~;L%tii~~?1ill] r"'7';Z"i~;r1'-4';7"-81 ]" 11'lf"<:1;'1l";r-15"~5-8'i::l ,', ~. ':. ": ,.j", . l" :' "',,'1,",' ,1...1-' 'ih,j)1 , " ;';"l;.lll~"",,,;,;.;<.;,,~..,, ,.,].__1 ",,,,,~llool_~,,'h,,,..._ ,,,.~,,,,..~f f!;il~n~;',;::n::,:,:';f4:"2'541I!i'ii:'~;;l!mlii+;w:i;43~:627'!h~ ~L1bJ,,,.,l,--.....i,jilliJllcl!!~J'.Llj;_..,i..,,=,,,,,~J lGii;i~", ':'86..3750i'1":.~,I,~'!19,f785'1" :',;j~,,;>;.L':",,ljlll,,....,;~, ;' ;,~._..~ii :;,:,;tlll;;,u:":::;",.:l..!,,,C,,,,,,",u,li 'r'n!t""""''i'''I>lu,,,;,,,''''''''''~''''''''''-'''''!'''''''''''''"''''''~'",, "'''..1m L::,1i'.'''1',~,:40 ;217iJil;"~ i'I,,:iiP6;404:;,j ~;;;i'i~2"2~6=7;:;"'0""!l"~~"I":1~;'m3t'f6'76::.r1 t:!Jmj;::,;;,,!:;:i,!t,'''',';'.,'\;,,,;j,,,,lmi:::I;;Jl1~,~:,,:':';",',."l,~,!,',."""L,,,,ill~ '!."~mr'''::::,!'.'f'1.. ... 't2,.~~..r.tj" Hinplrinw!'---'r'1"'-'-:'-""'''''~'''~ It:1:..J~f~;""~' 3,...1'~..'a~~~'9t:lli,:3~ ~9,9 A l'.:w,"""^"'-:-7',....~~.,~".......,~ --.",-.'t;"'''!l!!m=='':l'--'-~ ':i~:i'iki!t;i::('}63';8 7 8 U.bi::'!'iif!il!:;:;;'i7,4'!389 i~ '.f""...""""""",,,,,,,,;' ';";''''I,..;I.\;,-""",I~.J!I!("",!",.II",.!",,,,,,,,,,,...: ili~~I~~Ti'""59b37:<::0I;":';J, 80 884'1:11 iWi..'....1;~.l......"'....,_~aL~.J:~I:..;.._?,,....,.........:tl FiT~!iiF';;07'irt:78~f)6'i!117,;;ammn-':,'IT':~f3T945'il' hlr"JI,,,,.i,,,' ,1I1~1\~., '",~.........;" L ,,,,,,,...IIl,,,,,~.!,'''_,' ",,,,:,,,.,,:Jlj! q:';'I' I ~i56':5~1 81i'I'I' ,"~~;;.fi8:~'91";i lJw.WL~'~"~"M"_"" ,...~",_~L..J.....,t.;;l.~.,,,,..<l,.. .,~,.~I..Jdll J;~~i~!f12Ufi;aWm~iWimRQJjJ;'1,,;i;i~7ill;~IWmH!fil5;JI:S!,;,Q,1m ~;::::r339ii80-'i~',;;';~:38;{733-:'j' .w,,, ..~,L;"". .,_,.. ""--,,~.......,,.I, 'du.Jt!il~':"I~.......L",",,~.......!1 bgr'!':.',:ii:~J3j~J~Ji;f~~13WslE~4,f~;~m ~l~"'~'---!b~r~---'-.-j \i:F,';::"",;,':';1t--3j478,1'h :~,l" J,"/lW::j':iI7r748 :i, ,1U~II1\"'" """,,,w.,l..., "..,<"',''''..;j,..,,,dL.,,,,','nhlLh_,.,....,H,~\_ t~~ \~g'~~:~'~~~I~~:,I~~~R~iqrJ~~lp' "~" .~:~~' , :",~;" ~(, .,. :: . '~,~~tl 371 Open Space District #18 372 Open Space District #20 373 Open Space District #23 374 Open Space District #24 375 Open Space District #26 376 Open Space District #31 377 Open Space District #33 378 CFD 07M-Eastlk II Woods, Vista 379 CFD 08M,Vlg 6 McM & Oty Ranc 380 CFD 09M OR Vlg II 381 CFD 09M,OR Vlg II Brookfld She 382 CFD 99,2 Otay Ranch Vlg 1 We 383 Town Ctr Business Imprv Distr 386 Otay Ranch Acquisition Dist 387 CFD 98,3 Sunbow 2 388 Comm Facility 97,1 (Otay Rnch) 389 Otay Ranch Village 1,2,6,7,12 TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 342 CFD 11,M RHR McMillin 343 CFD 12-M VIg7 344 CFD 13,M VIg2 345 CFD 12M, OR Village 7 351 Town Centre Landscaping Dist I 352 Bay Blvd Landscaping Dist 353 Eastlake Maintenance Dist #1 354 Open Space District #1 355 Open Space District #2 356 Open Space District #3 357 Open Space District #4 358 Open Space District #5 359 Open Space District #6 361 Open Space District #7 362 Open Space District #8 363 Open Space District #9 364 Open Space District #10 365 Open Space District #11 366 Open Space District #13 367 Open Space District #14 368 Open Space District #15 369 Open Space District #17 371 Open Space District #18 372 Open Space District #20 373 Open Space District #23 374 Open Space District #24 99,165 1,001,327 53,979 18,085 7,182 83,776 o 355,191 571,741 397,610 o 462,663 o 139,852 737,066 1,067,648 90,667 $6,171,160 31,151 386,851 o 332,246 1,051 20,295 258,619 58,585 12,957 45,816 77,311 29,553 19,182 13,368 63,924 63,301 74,889 99,021 14 316,734 14,966 3,864 88,165 934,669 49,593 19,202 -174- 103,488 1,002,541 43,754 20,029 7,709 87,111 o 386,527 818,132 642,222 o 620,320 o 221,881 813,062 1,492,918 88,240 $7,668,071 5,784 344,923 42,236 163,341 1,097 20,543 283,373 77,268 13,581 48,255 82,936 44,988 27,423 13,390 67,822 65,442 76,460 157,916 22 330,940 '21,462 5,261 101,009 996,351 51,396 24,978 , 121,J52:>:~f30,497 '1 1,173)352, ,1356062 , :,58,7?9 n' 5i;~33' i:?$'/~f1i;::;;}:':""" iH;;;:??,':~6Tii;t ;9,104 ",..,12,(3~5 r,' ,': 117,060'., ',' , 139,203 ,,0 ",/, ,0, ~91 ,781 ,615,'876, ,':~~:~~~ .:;':,.~~~:~:6': 0" '" ", " 0' , 737:002 720,09i. ,:__,::,' , 0: ' " ,'0 ' '565,5,00 '", '871,,265 991,'464 - 1,011,592 ",{895;650 , : ?,239,941' ",'",', ',,104,50,6, , ,',' '104916 '" ....,;,'"".....,........".,.,.,......................,'"..",'.,'i';.........'....';.;;"..w,.";! $10,475,403 $11,866,649 ~)~~~~ iSp(Qtj~t~'~,~V~1F.f{J'~i~~ ~_~~ ~:. ':~ ','~: -~~~~,~ '~':~-~~'_' i5~~:I 375 Open Space District #26 376 Open Space District #31 377 Open Space District #33 378 CFD 07M-Eastlk II Woods, Vista 379 CFD 08M-Vlg 6 McM & Oty Ranc 380 CFD 09M OR Vlg II 381 CFD 09M-OR Vlg II Brookfld She 382 CFD 99-2 Otay Ranch Vlg 1 We 383 Town Ctr Business Imprv Distr 386 Olay Ranch Acquisition Disl 387 CFD 98-3 Sunbow 2 388 Comm Facility 97-1 (Olay Rnch) 389 Otay Ranch Village 1,2,6,7,12 TOTAL REVENUES 7,952 79,151 o 167,044 295,970 500,122 o 591,457 (1,334) 63,329 879,696 1,822,891 84,635 $7,506,240 .175- 9,433 100,287 o 262,722 462,875 486,890 o 644,518 2,391 379,654 940,629 1,681,123 85,372 $8,124,091 $10,475,403 $11,866,649 [0 "WORj(;ERS"cJOMPEI'\ISAtll'O'N~IF'l:j:NO : . ~ '231'1 t _ _ _ _ _ 1 '"- ~_ _ _ _ _ ~_ ~ _ _ _ _ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 683,414 2,069,161 $2,752,575 669,872 1,995,339 $2,665,211 ';;i'-';''ti'539';S4Cf)';:' ":,Y539"'s;iQ'l 1.''''">;;h.:,''':'i..,.:._,,...',..~;;jJ;:!iiJil:W;it.~!4.M..!^,............,jj Ie ,2;-5-50 ,00'6'lr;r~:;2:9i9:oT9'1 ~l""<;""".,,,,...n,.,......, ,w,"''''',o'~~''''';';'_''''_''''''''''''''d'''''_''.n,,'' $3,089,840 $3,458,859 2,904,591 $2,904,591 r;;;:":"2"~82 '1'-9"1:~7"7Q:":J;-2"'8--2-1r9-1-7iji1 3,050,30 1 b""":'!d..~","""'.I.',','"i~.j,..i;gilih,;'h.!L,...,!,,..,~.I,,',,.....",,::;c;';l $3,050,301 $2,821,917 $2,821,917 r;r~~"~''''~'''''''-''f1Y'>lW'1'''''''''~:)''''''.'''-;i~'!t;tJ~:':~~):'iiF~!rWJi~7l1'"'1,;~l,"!'~1l',r'IVlf"( f~''''-''--'''' .#"";t""i\::~t"f'f.i.t:~m"--,.."'~:, .......,'~':':.~~.'..,.'J1""""".."._..':. ,~"~,..,'" '~~W'~"""""~"~'''",,,'-~''-~''..,rW''<''l1 .t.JETcF.,lJ/'.JD ~CTIVITY;r':',"",C '1,1f.:1<':"I'i!' 'J;/ '" .r:;j,'";'''''",$,152,O,1~:I',,:i.' ," $385;090',~r';i ";($267,!l2~),; 11~~..($636:942p . ~"l~'."..,'ii,k .-., ,~"",'.."":;tr,k."h1,n,,,_ ., _ill'"'''."."ll!!''' ,-- .,,1 ~,'.,..,,,,.,, "' '.:;".,.IIU"..".,.;<'j,j. "". ""M"""",.:II,,_ '.:,...;~",,,, .,' ,J..". ,,,,,1....,,,.,;.-,.1,'1.., ...' ""OM".. ,,,,,l;,,w,,w.-'~'H""'H...,.,, ,;.. ,1;Jll, ..,....,'.,j~,', "'"ll".,.. .",.,...~,~"".~Il.,.,.ililj.il;,"m!l -176- ~~.~~~,E~l~ID~~$'~E,~r~~~~:'~~~~~'~!iiI~OiJl~r~j~, :_,....:~:' ";/~ ,i~;i~~ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services 265,738 259,010 Supplies and Services 54,375 29,055 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $320,113 $288,065 $324,889 $310,000 REVENUES Other Revenue 276,064 265,866 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $276,064 $265,866 $310,000 $310,000 -177- ;" :inJB:U:C,U~BUkiI1iY tRl'[J~f:Oi~lo . -c. . ~.:. 34r~ll _ "'- l _ _. . _ _.. __ _ _, ., +.___ ~_ ~ ___ _ EXPENDITURES Other Expenses TOTAL EXPENDITURES o $0 705,387 $705,387 l~I~:~E':j:E:iM::~l1:;tQ~ji:.~~rEj,r:;',~9~Q~;:QQ!I] $0 $1,800,000 REVENUES Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o $0 o $0 '"l:':"':'''';11,.~,11;1''''1r'''il1t:'0-'''~I!i=;''!J;!I''1'''K"'8''''0-0'''0-O'O'-:'~ 11IJ;,.t.i1!+n~Li'I!:'W:i;:!l:......""~!"::';bd;;>.i",,.,; ""..,,,;',,,,,,,,,,,,11'!/ $0 $1,800,000 r.......'"''''~'~.''''. "''''i!''~''m''~'.'''''''''V'''-''''''''!!rGf'~I'':'Jj':':irl'~'T;,''I:I,.'8ri:I.~7;,1~!'li;~I':';;~1Piri,W:0:YYf :~,~-j'.'$"'l>"",;~!A;'::I] ',i. '1"-$7.".....0 .... r.' ..".,,7)"'1;~;-j ,r'7i;:r:'-TJi:0aiT;r""$"-"-~(:mr:r'~:'~;',ifJr;.JITrITi;'$""!"'"::';1 ,NE] E.UND !ACTI rrY;JlirA 1";'.;11 l'j"ii.i;'Jlli;~dll!i;{",;:;",< ,'k;;H:i!IJ:i;"~;lj'-i,'" .,:l!.".,., O::,',I!,hdil:iil:( 5,.38 ; "I!;; <:"ltl:'!<ilii ,,"';0"',1': 0 '!(';'.(W;,:,!![il\; ;J,[i.i'\i{ 0 !,~ J,;..,..:",:.d)1l.!8~...:!k>::lL<!~l.Jl; ';' ., ',"",:4...,' "., ijji;.::bt...l..l:...i~:"I~~,..m-::';'~~_';:;~;;.;..,.....;L'.Jb~//,,;~"":''ili.!;;,,~J;.~ii!j;:;:~~!;j;..l':1L..;..::l~'!.,;.;;.ll;., .178. .-m:~Ci~~INO~~G~IRIE-Pt~e;EM~~~ H;J!NE:f'.. '~ .. -_ 39'~>1 FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Capital Transfers Out TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 734,677 o $734,677 196,555 o $196,555 $0 $7,382 (2,026) 269,851 $267,825 2,072 49,697 $51,769 $0 $0 t"""'''''''<<;"'''''''~~''''--'''''~''''''~~11,,:1~!~n-;:IDnm1Ft''1r:!'T~~~'''--'-''~'':t"p'''~--:---,.........'~'f, ,'i''l:1f1l;:--I' ~;;-r::;:'7-r:~"-"-"~~ NET IiUND ACTIVIT.Y ,'!","." ",1' r .1.' '-', r"." ,. ". ,.,' '.($466852)""" .($144786)"", ,,:.! .) "".:', $0' ,~,.. .'",," ($7'382) b ;,"""""'" ;;i;)i"'I,,~jb;,.;ih;i';;i;';";;;liil;"IJ;.W,';;;,i!:\.:: '."ii;,i;illw;;,ll:ilr'::,:::,:,;,;;,jjt:.J,:Jb;,;);-,;L;;';';ii",...."\",I'~i, ,?, "';;""1",."~:~,;i~1;i!:",,,,.;\li':'1~1';;;';;;;\; ;,!;!~J~IJtli'U:;l::;<: >;,i:;;Ll."",~m,",;',;;;;:;:):liLi;;tI.lo,>l>,i';:~,; ,; ;' ,;, i.i,., , -179- .180. ;. <': .N~~-G~PITA~.:IMP.ROYE~EN!1I~R?JECif ,ati~G~.lI '. 'jl . ,'- r. 'FundIng Summary by Project T'){Pe .' " -. . _ ..... _. w ~ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ ARRA Homeless Prevention Program ARRA TOTAL r.........-............'I.....~~. ,.' ,1:$795'1 '4' 6 ' ~'~1,_.....J.".._~~' $795,146 CDBG Affordable Housing Project for Very Low Income (NSP) South Bay Regional Homeless Center Youth Services for High..Risk Youth Chula Vista Family Assessment and Referral Fair Housing Counseling Services Family Violence Treatment YMCA Youth Development Programs KidCare Express Mobile Unit Project Hand Therapeutic Recreation Services Food 4 Kids Backpack Program Safe Kids Transportation Services Meals-Dn-Wheels Chula Vista Community Access Program WizKidz Program Interfaith Shelter Network Thursday's Meal Fair Housing Audit Services South Bay Adult Day Health Care Transportation Caring Neighbor Rehabilitation Services Task Force on the Homeless CDBG TOTAL $1,461,550 ,181, :;:: :'~"~',,::<'~@~~~~flil~~~ '1(M~~'<~~Mf~'~~lIt.JJfi{Q"~~1Ji !a'~I~G'E'ii' .;;. ~ : ~ : .?~ :. :\.:-::::: '.'~'~" ~. '.". .:1 " 'ffuna7ng'SiJm;i1ai"y.l6y:Pr,~lect f;ype".!-~ '. . - ." ,":. ;, _~ ",:J, -~. ;.'~:_ _ ~.~;. ~--,.-- _-.. _ - -~;::-,"{".--=,,- "tL ~- ,_<<--.'..... _, '"" _ _" l"_ ___ .:: ~__..:..__ HOUSING HOUSING TOTAL $83,804 REDEVELOPMENT Bayfront and Third Avenue Southwest Specific Plan REDEVELOPMENT TOTAL $300,000 GRANDi TOTAL - ALL PROJECTS $2,640,500 -182- p o R IP o s E D B u D G E 1 CAP~TAl ~MPROVEMENl PROC RAM Capital Improvement Program Summary Revenue Summary Expenditure Summary Capital Improvement Projects Summary -183- :_l~fl ,l,,-.l>'_r-.:f!li" ,I" ,,,' l"~,, i :;~.!f;;~i,;!::::,;';'i~i:;~:~t.'~ r""'""""""'~'''''''''''' I, ";,."...,:,,,,]J"""':"""l ;;:i~;< ; I;, ' ;~[, d:;l~:~il ':lil~!~:i~'::::I:;r.;:;:i;i:'~;I;!;:: f' "1 '1;'" "t....,,~,',! < ",''''-,.'''',''' T'f < ~:;j <g~~l!;:;:;';:l :~~~~i;':il':,:~{:; ;i:~:~ '"'':'qtJi'-'.,:..,,,I.''''''''' , '~'::: '~l:: ':1. r:;t.~ ~f-;;S!;:::';f'~~) ',;: :' "~'IL. <t'!".<!';,' ',~'<:!,!l,\ll I:;,;, :1;11":1 ";';,;':,,:<,,- _'l,!",.,,-,,:'''''-'',,', ,", ~ 'il'" p' l' , ", I' !,. ,.,1>',. '^ --,.... ,,! ,," " t_;;;:ii~;::l:I~J,:;iifffi~~~!~~:,~;::!:Ji!~: ~,<"",Io,_" 'iF:'~:j'" ')"-"""1"'.,1'.1-> "'1 :;,:f'~ll.l':;;!i,:\';;i:"'.:':;i:il,!i,;i:;r,..!:!:1 ";,',,, "[';"1"1,'i;j""'" ','''''" ," '.Iij li;"1)~llii;!:"!!~;1' ~ J, " ',:ii>' It;~~:l~~;l """"h.'~"~' ", ': :~;j: tltll!/ ' ~- :' ',:~:,;l;, ,t,..". ,H 'h", ,.,c,,, is,;, ", 'j ;-,t,.~g::J~~ B'1,,,,,j,,,,.,,,,:.>"""'""-"lt"i ""''''''''1 0{ :;: -:: ~';~~l~' ' , r:1<.~ ;: ill ::,!~;r -: rtl<l'l~ l'll'l.:< ~!I'1!,~!r~ 'd>-t, ~j~l;ir:::;,!{.::' . ,t~~~'ii,:ll::!,::~:l I". ~ ,~lb' , ~:.J.!1.\ >,,"~: <", ~:ifl~ :i!!:::C < 1- ~~ujl;;:'::;;;ii\:~!~:' "~~!':':':!l:I"J4 :1,:; ':1;: ~:~~ ~:i; , . i;::::<:'::;;jii!!,~l;l ::ri!)~;; :;; ;~J::~::::;~;;.<.!;i;i;:;'~l~' r"'"""'" ,,,,,.,,',', ,""I,,,,'''',,'' """".",,1 r'1!i~i;.i~rff~~tj'it}:~llli~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY To follow is a summary of the fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The program outlined herein was developed with two main goals in mind. The first is to build upon the City's growing recognition of the need for additional commitment and funding for infrastructure preservation efforts. The second goal is to recognize the changing fiscal position of the City and downturn in development-related capital revenues. While there are still several development- related capital projects in the program, the overall CIP seeks to balance both the types of projects and the geographical locations where projects would occur to best meet the needs of the City and its residents, businesses and visitors. Significant funding is dedicated to on-going infrastructure rehabilitation projects. These include streets, sidewalks and sewers. In particular, street-related rehabilitation projects are predominant in this program. These projects occur on a citywide basis and are part of a comprehensive process that the City performs every year to assess the most cost efficient manner to preserve and rehabilitate the City's infrastructure. The City utilizes a comprehensive pavement management system, which forms the basis for the development of current and future pavement rehabilitation projects. With regard to the street rehabilitation effort, the City continues to focus significant attention and resources on street improvements in western Chula Vista. A number of projects have been undertaken in the past several years, including over $10 million of street rehabilitation projects, as well. as significant sidewalk improvements. That effort will continue and will also include the formation of assessment districts on a number of streets in the Castle Park neighborhood. During fiscal year 2007-08, the City successfully completed the process for obtaining a $9.5 million loan from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for street improvements in the Castle Park neighborhood. Those loan proceeds became available to the City in June of 2008 and will be -185- paid back from the City's annual allotment of COBG funds. Construction of First Avenue, between Naples Street and Palomar Street, is complete and a number of street improvement projects are moving forward, including work on Glenhaven Way (west of First Avenue), Oxford Street (Third Avenue to Alpine Avenue) and Second Avenue (Naples Street to Palomar Street). Once these projects on the main streets in the neighborhood are completed, remaining funds will be utilized on local streets within the Castle Park neighborhood. The City continues to focus on its Annual Sewer Rehabilitation Program, which expends approximately $1 to $2 million annually for the replacement and rehabilitation of sewer pipes and manholes. The City also utilizes standardized evaluation and ranking criteria in televising and evaluating the condition of sewers in order to assure that the most critically impacted sewer infrastructure is replaced or rehabilitated first. As previously mentioned, over the last several years the City has evaluated the condition of its Storm Drain facilities, which includes approximately 88,000 lineal feet of corrugated metal pipe (CMP) storm drain within the City limits. CMP storm drains have not been allowed for permanent use in the City of Chula Vista for over 20 years due to more rapid deterioration than other types of pipes, such as plastic and reinforced concrete pipes. The deteriorating CMP storm drains were categorized as Priorities 1 thru 4, as follows: Priorit 1 2 3 4 5 Year Lineal Feet of CMP 2,282 ft 21,858 ft 9,698 ft 2,437 ft 6,785 ft Much of the CMP identified as Priority 1 has been rehabilitated. However, due to limited funding, priorities 2,3 and 4 are being addressed on an as-needed basis, either after failure has occurred or when failure is imminent. The CIP Program seeks to find dedicated funding for this critical program; however, due to eligibility limitations and availability of such funds, it has been increasingly difficult to fund CMP replacement and rehabilitation work. A total of $1.2 million in TransNet monies are being proposed to fund calendar year 2009 emergency drainage projects. While this focus on infrastructure continues, the City has also engaged in a program for the construction of several facilities. Since 2002, the City has undertaken over $63 million of new park and recreation facility construction. Construction activities have commenced on Mt. San Miguel Community Park and All Seasons Park construction is proposed in the fiscal year 2009-10 program. -186- Over 151 acres of new parkland and 58,000 square feet of new recreation center space will have been added between 2002 and the end of fiscal year 2008-09. The $50 million renovation of the Civic Center Complex is complete and the buildings are fully occupied. The design of the Rancho del Rey Library is complete and construction is planned to commence as soon as sufficient Public Facilities Development Impact Fees (PFDIF) are generated and/or library construction grant funding is secured. Given the economic conditions within the construction/development industry, as well as the competitive nature of library grants, it is not possible at this point in time to estimate a construction schedule. -187- -188- CIP REVENUE SUMMARY B n the fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program, there are a number of key funding I sources; to follow is a brief description of some of the most programmed funding sources. TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) funds are derived from sales tax revenues levied in San Diego County that are collected by the State specifically for use on transportation related projects in San Diego County. The regional metropolitan planning agency, San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), programs these funds to municipalities within San Diego County. Revenues vary from year to year, depending on the amount of sales tax available to the region and the number and costs of projects for which municipalities, local transit, and Caltrans request funding. The revenue approved for municipalities is based on the specific cost estimates that are required to be submitted as part of the annual request for funding. In fiscal year 2009-10, Transportation Sales Tax proposed budgets are $8.6 million, with an additional $3.4 million of TransNet ARRA funds (TransNet funds re-allocated from Caltrans projects that received Federal ARRA funding for construction). Of that amount, approximately $7.7 million is programmed for pavement rehabilitation. A number of smaller traffic congestion improvement projects and transportation planning efforts are also funded from TransNet. The City continues to ensure that a minimum of . . - - 70% of its TransNet funds are allocated to congestion relief efforts. This limits the City's use of these funds for minor pavement rehabilitation efforts to a maximum 30% of the City's annual allocation. The City intends to explore the possibility of dedicating additional amounts,to minor pavement efforts (projects with less than a one-inch thick overlay) with SANDAG in the future. -189. SEWER FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND The Sewer Facility Replacement Fund is a fee based revenue source that all properties pay each month as part of their sewer bills. The funds can be utilized to replace, rehabilitate or upgrade existing sewer facilities. In fiscal year 2009-10, a total of $0.7 million is proposed to be funded. Among the projects receiving funding are the annual rehabilitation program ($0.3 million) and Robinhood Ranch II Pump Station Improvements ($0.4 million). In addition, approximately $5.8 million of existing funding and projects will carry over. TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEE The Traffic Signal Fee is a trip based development impact fee that is charged with the issuance of building permits for new construction. The fee can be utilized for the installation and upgrade of traffic signals throughout the City. In fiscal year 2009-10, it is proposed that $1.1 million be funded. Traffic Signal Fees are down, as are all development related revenues, and the projects list for the fund has been re-prioritized However, the City has received notification of American Recovery Reinvestment Act funds for eligible Traffic projects, which allowed for approximately $0.8 million of Traffic Signal funds to be reallocated to other projects. PROPOSITION 1B HIGHWAY FUNDS In 2006-07, the voters of the state approved Proposition 1 B. This proposition included funds to be provided to cities within the state for local roadway improvements. The City will receive a total of approximately $7.0 million, $36 million in fiscal year 2008-09 and the remaining portion in fiscal year 2009-10. PROP 42 (TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF FUND) Several years ago, the voters approved Proposition 42, which provided funding for cities to improve streets. The funds can only be utilized for street improvements and the City has utilized these funds to augment its annual pavement rehabilitation efforts. In fiscal year 2008-09, the amount budgeted from this fund for this purpose is $1.0 million. In fiscal year2009-10, the proposed amount to be budgeted is $348,000. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS Each year, the City receives approximately $1.9 million in CDBG funds. Of this amount, approximately $1.1 million is available for capital improvement projects. The City of Chula Vista received Section 108 loan funds in June of 2008 for the Castle Park street improvement projects; the debt service on that loan will be paid back from the City's annual allotment of CDBG funds. -190. This will reduce the amount of CDBG funds available for other capital projects to approximately $0.5 million annually for the next ten years. All of these funds are programmed for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Curb Ramp construction. The City's ADA Annual. Curb Ramp Program improves pedestrian accessibility and walkability for all citizens, in compliance with ADA requirements and standards. Ramps are constructed in priority order, from a Transition Plan of approximately 1200 ramps approved by the City Council, and based primarily on proximity to public and transit services, public facilities, schools, and commercial facilities. Upon completion of the ramps identified in the Transition Plan, retrofits of existing, older ramps will be required to provide greater levels of accessibility. MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS The City has applied for and been approved to receive various grants to fund Capital Improvement Projects. These grants include Smart Growth Incentive, TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program, and Public Ubrary Federal Grants. Cumulatively, the amounts budgeted for fiscal year 2009-10 is approximately $2.8 million (not including ARRA exchange funds). In addition, the City continues to pursue American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funds. The City was recently approved for $34 million in ARRA funds via an exchange in TransNet funds through SANDAG. These funds are programmed in the fiscal year 2009-10 program for Pavement, Traffic Signal related projects and Third Avenue Streetscape. AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT FUNDS President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act into law, which provides "economic stimulus" funds in the amount of $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) nationwide. A large portion of the ARRA funds are intended to benefit individuals through tax relief, Medicaid, and mortgage assistance. Another portion is intended to assist public agencies in providing services and improving infrastructure to keep people employed as well as to create new jobs. City staff has been working diligently since before the adoption of ARRA to identify opportunities that would benefit Chula Vista and be ready for aggressive timelines and application periods. In anticipation of the bill, the U.S. Conference of Mayors asked cities to come up with ready-to-go projects that would create jobs and invest in infrastructure. Along with other San Diego county cities, through SANDAG, Chula'Vista identified a number of projects already designated as "shovel ready" that can start immediately. Most cities focused on proposals for roads, sewer and other infrastructure projects. In all, Chula Vista's wish list'added up to about $540 million. -191- The City already knows of many projects that would benefit the community, if funding were available. Many of the ARRA funds come with very specific eligibility criteria and regulatory guidelines. If the City has some projects already identified that would meet that criteria, then that could free up less restrictive money for other community projects. For example, Federal highway funds generally may only be used on designated arterial roadways. There are a number of infrastructure projects already identified in the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan and the Western Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF). Any federal highway funds received by the City would be used on designated arterial roadways even if they are lower on the priority list, thereby making more local funds, such as TransNet, available for use on local streets. Transparency is an important component of ARRA. The Federal government has created a website to convey results and performance measurements to the public. Similarly, it will be important to keep our local residents apprised of the City's actions and results with ARRA funds. City staff has created a scorecard to track potential applications for ARRA funds, funds received, and performance with funds received. The scorecard and any related ARRA information will be maintained on the City's website. The following chart summarizes the funding sources for the Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 2009-10. Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Expenditures by Funding Source TransNet 38.1% Miscellaneous Grants . Miscellaneous 9.9% ~ 0.4% I / Library Grants I.------ 0.6% \ CDBG , 3.6% Traffic Signal 3.5% "'----- Sewer Funds 5.6% Transportation Grants 15.1% ~ Del.elopment Impact Fees " 13.3% Park ACqUisituin~ Redel.elopment and Del.elopment Funds 6.5% 3.3% -192- CIP EXPENDITURE SUMMARY The capital budget complements the operating budget by providing funding for major capital projects. The fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) plan includes $30.4 million in funding. It should be noted that of that amount, approximately $4 5 million are reallocation of existing funds from prior years. In addition, there is approximately $10 million of existing appropriations that will carry over into fiscal year 2009-10. The majority of the funding recommended with the adoption of the budget pertains to the rehabilitation/improvement of existing facilities. The following chart provides a breakdown, by project type, of the total $30.4 million of appropriations proposed with this budget. Fiscal Year 2009-10 CIP Budget by Project Type Major Streets 26.3% Drainage Gen GovUOther 8.0.'1 Projects/RDA 44% , Library ':__________ 0.6% Sewer 5.3% Parks and Recreation 6.5% -193- FACILITIES The total cost of building and park facilities over the last 15 years has exceed $100 million, which includes the completion of the renovations to the Civic Center Complex, various recreational facilities, new and renovated parks, new and renovated fire stations and other projects. The funding sources for these projects included development impact fees (DIF), residential construction tax (RCT), redevelopment funds (RDA), grants and the General Fund. With respect to the Civic Center, the project has been completed and fully occupied as of November 2008. The final component to the Civic Center project will be the construction of a new Fire Station NO.1. The Master Plan for the Fire Facility network has been completed. LIBRARIES The City received $95,000 in Public Library Federal Funding proposed to fund the Civic Center Library Veterans Wing. Another major project is the construction of the Rancho del Rey Library, which will be one of four branch libraries serving the four corners of the City. The 31,129 square- foot facility will be a full-service library, with a capacity of up to 130,000 books, audio-visual materials and newspapers and magazines. Besides some 28,000 items in Spanish, there will also be unique cultural heritage collections focusing on Filipino, Pan-Asian and Hispanic cultures in reflection of the community's diversity. The estimated cost of the project is $19.1 million. The design of the library has been completed. Due to the slowdown in development activities, the fund balance of the PFDIF (which is responsible for 100% of the costs of the project) is not sufficient to move forward with construction. It is unknown when sufficient PFDIF revenues will be available to commence construction. PARKS Numerous major neighborhood parks, including Cottonwood Park, Heritage Park, Breezewood Park, Harvest Park and Santa Venetia Park in Otay Ranch and Sunset View Park in Eastlake Greens were completed. In fiscal year 2005-06, Harborside Park, the first new park in western Chula Vista in over 25 years and Mountain Hawk Park in Eastlake Vistas were completed. In addition to these neighborhood parks, three large community parks were also opened to the public. These parks were Veterans Park, Salt Creek Park and -194- ."1' -~::r~ l :,~~:,,-..,,~! >:..1!~'1; ._.r, 1,--:1 .,'/-, ~~~'="?""" ,.V 1.""",,- "~,",, ~"", i_,,~~~~~:.! , I,:~~~~-~;';:;~~:,;.!.I b : ~,~;._ l';;~~'~Tr:.;;-=N' R lilt UllllllllWl"nma=tty Jri _ w ... i~! .-- ......""':.~ - ~._,.. .. ,... -.. .: .... ~~. Montevalle Park. All three of these facilities included recreation centers. Several other neighborhood parks were completed in fiscal year 2006-07 including, Horizon Park and Winding Walk Park in Otay Ranch. The renovations of Otay Park ($1.9 million) were completed in the spring of 2008. Also, the design of Mt. San Miguel Park, a community park in San Miguel Ranch ($7.0 million), has been completed. Funding for Mt. San Miguel Ranch Community Park was appropriated mid-year in fiscal year 2008-09 with construction currently underway. The new neighborhood park in Village 7 of Otay Ranch, named All Seasons Park, ($2.9 million) has seen its master plan approved and design is nearing completion. It is proposed that $2 million be appropriated in fiscal year 2009-10 as necessary to begin construction. FIRE FACILITIES Included in the proposed five year CIP forecast is construction of the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) Fire Station. The City is currently negotiating a development agreement to offset the construction costs and operating costs for the EUC fire station. Fire stations one and five are in need of replacement. Built in 1954, Fire Station 5 was part of the Montgomery Fire District. This station is 55 years old and in a state of deterioration. Further, Fire Station 5 is far past its useful life needing constant repair due to structural damage that has been brought on by age - Station 5 is currently in need of a new roof and other major repairs. Fire Station 1 was built in .1948 and is 61 years old. This station also has structural damage due to its age and is in need of a roof. The Fire Department will apply for economic stimulus funding (ARRA) to address the replacement of both of these stations as both of these stations meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the grant guidelines. Station 5 is recommended to be relocated to a larger site adjacent to the South Library. The relocation of Station 5 to a larger site will allow the expansion of future service delivery to respond to growth needs. The Fire Facility Master Plan document is being updated to achieve fire and emergency medical service delivery within national public safety standards. The plan will be presented to Council in an upcoming workshop this fall Lastly, discussions are underway regarding Bayfront Capital Improvement Projects as follows: . Bayfront Sewer Lift Station - $12.4* million fiscal year 2010-11 . . Bayfront Fire Station North East corner of Bay Blvd and "J" Street - $12 million fiscal year 2010-11 . Bayfront Park Improvements - $6 68* million fiscal year 2011-12 'Includes estimated design, project management and contingency -195- It is anticipated that these projects will be programmed beginning with fiscal year 2010-11 and in future years. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS The infrastructure portion of the CIP budget contains significant funding for a variety of infrastructure improvements. As discussed above and elsewhere within the City's budget, a substantial amount of the funding is focused on infrastructure improvements in the western portion of the City and preservation of infrastructure citywide. Over the past few years, City staff has presented a number of reports to the City Council with regard to the condition and capacity of existing infrastructure (i.e., pavement, corrugated metal pipe, storm drains, sewers, roadways, etc.) citywide, as well as the lack of sidewalks and other public improvements primarily within the western portion of the City, especially within the Montgomery Annexation area. . Adequate funding is currently not available to build new infrastructure and maintain existing infrastructure. Therefore, the CIP strives to balance the need and desire to provide enhanced public facilities, while assuring that existing infrastructure is maintained and preserved in at least a minimally acceptable condition over the long-term. With the adoption of the fiscal year 2004-05 budget, the City Council approved a financing plan for infrastructure improvements in western Chula Vista. This financing plan revolved around a two- pronged financing program. One element of the program was a $9 million bond issue that would be repaid from the City's Residential Construction Tax (RCT) revenues over a period of 30 years. That financing was completed in late summer of 2004 This portion of the financing was earmarked for drainage and park improvements. With the receipt of those funds, work has been completed on a number of drainage projects in western Chula Vista. A total of $4.7 million of the financing was dedicated to drainage improvements. The balance of these funds was utilized to construct Harborside Park ($2.1 million), Otay Park renovations ($1.9 million) and improvements to Lauderbach Park ($.6 million) -196- The second portion of the financing is a $9.5 million loan through the US Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Section 108 loan program. The loan will be repaid through the City's annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement from HUD and will be paid back over a period of 20 years. The Section 108 loan is earmarked for street improvements in the Castle Park area. The City formally submitted its application for the loan in May of 2006 and the loan was approved in fiscal year 2006-07. The loan funds became available to the City in June of 2008. With the approval of the loan, work has commenced on the projects. The City Council directed that the main streets in the neighborhood proceed first. First Avenue is complete, with Oxford Street, and Second Avenue moving forward. Also moving forward is Glenhaven Way. This street is not a main street in the neighborhood; however, it intersects with First Avenue, has sufficient signatures on the assessment district formation petition and offers some economies of scale Other major efforts include the City's annual pavement management program that will be funded at a level of $7.7 million. This effort is augmented by funds previously appropriated (approximately $10 million are being carried over into the new fiscal year and contracts continue to be issued). In the coming years the city will be seeking other revenue sources to try to maintain a similarly high level of reinvestment in our pavement citywide. In addition, the City was fortunate to receive TransNet ARRA exchange funds totaling $3.36 million. Those funds will be utilized on Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways ($2.61 million) and Traffic Signal Modification Projects ($0.75 million). These funds are being received as TransNet funds, thus providing an additional $3.36 million of programmable funding. Also included in the budget is funding for new ADA accessible curb ramps ($504,922), traffic signal modification and installations ($1.965 million), and sewer rehabilitation, improvements, a feasibility study, and capacity enhancements ($1.7 million). The budget also includes funding for continued -197- traffic count, monitoring, neighborhood and pedestrian safety, signing and striping, and congestion relief programs ($1.185 million). The city was the recipient of Smart Grow1h Incentive and Environmental Mitigation Program funding. The Smart Growth Incentive is proposed to fund Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements ($2 million), Palomar Gateway Specific Plan ($400,000) and Industrial Boulevard Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements ($283,900). The Environmental Mitigation Program funding is proposed to fund the Cactus Wren Habitation Restoration - Central City Preserve Area ($373,048). OTHER Several other projects are being proposed for redevelopment and upgrade/maintenance of information technologies specific to capital improvement projects. The projects proposed include the Downtown Parking District Improvements ($120,000), storefront renovation ($150,000) and upgrade and maintenance of the capital improvement software (CIPAce), AutoCAD, GIS OrthophotographylTopography and Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program ($75,000). The replacement of fuel storage tanks at the Public Works Center is also being proposed in the fiscal year 2009-10 program. CIP PROJECT GEOGRAPHICAL BALANCE Council has indicated that one of its primary goals in the coming years is a continued focus on capital and infrastructure needs in the western portion of the City. For this discussion, the terrn western refers essentially to those areas of the City west of Interstate 805. As a sub-area in the western portion of the City, the projects that are specific to the Montgomery area are broken out separately. Also, a category of projects has been developed that is called Citywide. The types of projects that are typified by Citywide include by are not limited to the annual pavement rehabilitation program, sidewalk rehabilitation program, ADA Curb ramp program and sewer facility rehabilitation program. As the eastern portion of the City continues to rapidly develop, there is a substantial need for infrastructure improvements. Developers, as part of their development approval obligations, construct many of the improvements that occur in the eastern portions of the City. For this reason, those projects which provide public benefit are not part of the City's CIP program. The actual amounts proposed for the geographical areas are depicted in the following table: -198- ~: '. ",'-:'--."" ,'~1": ,', . , J~i~j]~ldjXWlOO',L' ..~ '-,.:. f:'" .. . - ;: . " * ..1".' .' . .. .... . .".. " . " ~'.. ~ _. ._ r', , ".. .;t.",.; -.," t' . .0' Urban Core $588,048 2% Citywide $12,842,973 42% Eastern CV $5,660,271 19% Montgomery $770,000 3% Southwest $1,567,570 5% Western CV $9,014,440 30% Total $30,443,302 100% "~.",t., . r,' . '....'. ,.~~~.. '~ " ..............,., .. ......., , ' ,.,. ~ .!' Urban Core $588,048 5% Montgomery $770,000 7% Southwest $1,567,570 13% Western CV $9,014,440 75% Total $11,940,058 100% Western Chula Vista Breakdown Given the nature of the citywide projects, it is safe to say that 50% to 60% of those expenditures typically occur in western Chula Vista though this can change from year to year. Assuming that 50% holds true, then 61% of the capital expenditures programmed for fiscal year 2009-10 are earmarked for western Chula Vista and Montgomery, It must also be noted that the eastern Chula Vista projects that the City itself undertakes are overwhelmingly funded by development impact fees or other revenues directly related to development activities (Traffic Signal FundITDIF/PAD), thus leaving significant revenue streams available to fund projects in the western portion of the City. -199. <it;; .c.~ ",_. .4JL' ',~ .air, ..",_~ .,.~ "-~-"'l-~--'"~-;~ ~~~ crnr Of ('P"'H'" ',J' ',' A", "", . ','S'I"""""'" , 't' '1!U "'iii '\I'''>'' ~", 1\,;; I,"!ill I'i ; 'i- r' Iii , #' f' Elm. " , r:'~ -200- c " ~ .', -j;CAPl"lTA:( IM'PR6vrM~N,t BtJiDGHli .- :. ;:'" "-1 : .~. <.,' ,:, '. j., :fundi~g Suiri0a;y by 'Pr.~je(Jt lIype '~ ." < '.' 1 DRAINAGE DR180 DR182 DR183 Emergency Storm Drain Replacement Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Avenue to Hilltop Drive DRAINAGE TOTAL "'-~-"-'-"'01 ['!J.!:?pq,Q..Q9''''! , ii'IW$956'6'5'6;i;; t".l.l. .,~:: l~...~,,-,-, ~..........,,,=il li:":-""; .....,.-..'>4f~..""'t'.'f!":ilI ti';;j;~2"Q,q.;g,~92:r.; $2,450,000 GENERAL GOVERNMENT GG183 GG187 GIS-OrthographylTopography Project Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL ""'M.'"' ..."...... " ""$15'000 'J ill ~l' ," ,,' " ,~i ........"'.....1...1.,;.'-.~ W1.i:iW$'7:fii6'om :!i~;~;i~jDI.;;,;;,,,,,;!_,,,,,:!::i;] $87,000 LIBRARY LB137 LB143 Automation Advancements & Upgrade Civic Center Library Veterans Wing LIBRARY TOTAL .' ..,.,~,,,,_.:.;. ",','.~M'-'''T''~'''' " 1 02(64~'i'l ........!_,/j. '''.....'1''"''''"''''''''?', $95,.9,9.9 ' $197,644 -201- : . - - -, -. 0 - f CAPI'if:-A'l ,1~~P~.O~EM:itN1f iBUI!3GElf - .', '.1 i..,: _,' ~ ; Funding 'Summary ,by Project 1!rp~ _ _ _~, _" _ ..~_ j LOCAL STREETS STL291 STL303 STL304 STL305 STL323 STL342 STL346 STL351 STL352 STL354 STL355 STL356 STL357 STL359 STL360 STL361 STL362 STL363 Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements First Avenue Impvmts Palomar - Naples Glenhaven Way Amy Street Improvements Oxford Street Improvements Third to Alpine Pedestrian Master Plan Second Avenue Improvements - Naples Street to Palomar Street Pavement Minor Rehabilitation Bikeway Master Plan Update ADA Curb Ramps FY09-10 Pavement Major Rehabilitation FY2009-10 Pavement Minor Rehabilitation FY2009-10 South Broadway Improvements, Main Street to Southern City Limits Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Prop 1 B) Naples Street & Oleander Ave. Cross Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps Construction' Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Palomar Street Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements LOCAL STREETS TOTAL r::',;:,r:]~-""~"'-:!""'''''''''; ",'"'{ , "I,i, $235' 000' " '''''':':;:11.".""."",'"..._".".;<1, i;i;~l~JW:W$""'~""'~~""'" "....~l! 1~.~::"'"lJ,_ 2Q,.QQQJill ;prtllJ;:111lr""'"'''' 11."''' "":n1R c ,.:imJmilL~,~g;Q.Qg;r:i!1 15:'6o'b:~ ,'<..r.~.f.:':"'!'f .n9_'!',Q.Qgg;n ::~ ,.;''''.........''~'..1f.. ....... ,Jl.?:QQQ,iliJ '<'C'llll"'..,,"'!''''~.''w.'''';.'.1 ;' l%il.~,~4~, Q,QQ , :i ";"':'-' "'d'6'''~'''''~':;'~J' $11,878,339 MAJOR STREETS STM35 STM35 STM36 STM36 North Broadway Reconstruction Otay Lakes Road Widening Heritage Road Bridge Reconstruction Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways MAJOR STREETS TOTAL ::'$2'3681"600;") iLib......,,,!;"~"~,..!_.......,,il..ljilll F'l~"'~~-'t."'~JTl ' ,\.~9,Q.~.QgQI;!ill . :3 1"5T27\ '" .~..:..""_, ,....,~",~ui ,l~:( ,~"~"''''''<)IDf \"'~_?"?. LQ, 9,Q,Q.d $7,793,271 -202- Ii' :-1 c~p,n;~UMPR@VE'M~N"F ;BU~'@iH ;-,', ,- ',I :' ~' '.,' :". j Ftmding S~'!J~ary 'Jjyj>roje~!~ type .~. ,,_ J OTHER PROJECTS OP200 OP202 OP206 OP208 OP212 OP217 OP218 Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program CIP Advanced Planning Automation" AutoCAD Upgrade CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase Downtown Pakring District Improvements Palomar Gateway Specific Plan Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area OTHER PROJECTS TOTAL ::;1'1'1'[' :$36"0""0'0.1 )-_.,..,;1'. ,,' .' t._"......_Ifu:~""....,..,..."","'",,;i 7:"'," If::-SS'200Q'Ta ;J..:;.;:,1;.;:;..,.,..-.....',''''~~k;:'J ::'!"~!":$10"660 ': ."E.... ......"'....",,,, "," 1:,;~:;~Ji!$'2'6:0'oc}'-!i\1 l..,l",u:.::~."'.."...""''''''.. r;1~4~.'..";~"'."'''..'!"'''...''''-''''.!t " :,,::'$120;000"'1'1 .".fr~wh-,.._..,,,..'h,,,,,.,""",,,",,,,.,'i ?)\~jq;'!t$4;75'1'6'6' lL....I~L,....,..d....,..' l'r-'~.j;. IU!~~;IJ:;>~,~Z;~;.Q,1~?" $1,120,048 PARKS AND RECREATION PR279 All Seasons Park PARKS AND RECREATION TOTAL i:l::'.-''''~:!.'''''''''''~'''~''''''''''~l ~";,:$2,000:000 I ["",,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,,',, $2,000,000 REDEVELOPMENT RD241 Storefront Renovation Program REDEVELOPMENT TOTAL :i;;I':~'; $1 50'1600 ,I lilL.. i..L""~..-...,.-'..-.....~_4,',,, $150,000 SEWER SW234 SW256 SW260 SW26~ Sewer Improvements on Colorado Between J & K Robinhood Ranch II Pump Station Improvements Sewer Rehab for FY2009-1 0 Industrial Blvd. And Main Street Capacity Enhanc.ement SEWER TOTAL fil~;::;$7J7. 6oo'll~ ~t.,,;;______.....f '_...::::l:J ~~j.~fl''''''''''''''''''~'''''-''''!''~! lUm!!t!;!,~,49g_,.Q,Q.qMii;i 1'li'.!Ji'$30b"1'00bi:' .2~l1."~.....~,,_..'.,,..........J.J ji,li:;1'$J:4o;OO'Oi!'m _,..d...;.,';".,';"'....,M,~......'''.,~". $1,617,000 -203- .' - -- -..- -" - - q--,. -- ,- - ----,~ -.' -- - ~- ---'1 r'";,, ,~;;. ;<~:,'_. 11~,M~J;t,,-\b}'~P~~~~~'~~~N~~B:~!~C~~~,._,; _,' ,:.. -.: "::' '..'- f<..'~;-'~:.'l~ '.c~, ~:~j,-_:~Jli1f!:ging;S~~fi1a"y,:liY'Ptd{~9;rrIJ!O~: ~;:~:-;-~ ' '" '< ~ .;.- '_~_.:-. TRAFFIC Traffic Count Station and Maintenance Traffic Signal Installation at Second Avenue and Quintard Street Citywide Traffic Count Program Traffic Monitoring Program Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program Traffic Signal Modification, Fourth & Main, Fourth & Beyer Traffic Signal Modification, Third & Montgomery Signing and Striping Program Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Program I-80S Direct Access Ramp East H & East Palomar Traffic Calming Program Traffic Signal System Optimization Traffic Congestion Relief Program Olay Mesa Transportation System SR54 Corridor and Arterial Operations Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Upgrade and Modification Program Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive and Main Street TRAFFIC TOTAL TF274 TF316 TF321 TF325 TF327 TF330 TF331 TF332 TF337 TF344 TF345 TF350 TF354 TF356 TF359 TF362 TF366 TF370 TF371 $3,150,000 GRAND TOTAL - ALL PROJECTS $30,443,302 -204- p R E o o s p E D B u D G T SUMMARY TABLES Fund Appropriations by Department and Expenditure Category Schedule of Revenues Fund Balance Projections Schedule of Interfund Transfers Authorized Positions by Department -205- PROPO fF~SCAl SlED YIEAR BUD G 2 ij 0 9 FUND APPROPRIAT~ONS DEPARTMENT AND EXPENDITURE CATEGORY -207- E T 1 o BY "'''''~--'<- n, , i<' ;>'1<' " <, :', ", ~;: ,\;~,,;~ "~""~ r:" ~, ..' " ,;,: r; '}' '" ,,",' ';. .. , ~L ,,0., ,j- l"l " , < : ::~l'?(: ';.~;,~;~{ ,:' '\\. <,./ ',0,,;/1' : ... :~:..,,/ " ,~. ' " , ': :: ~ ' ; , ,," " , ." < Jr;;::::-~I:,; ,:'!f ";'::"'!',,, , \~:::~~;~!, ,~'" ' i <'i ',,1 >':' '; ~~,l, I ~ , :"ti:' ,:,!,,::: ,<":~~';~~~':, -.--,_.-: ',1(.' <, ,::'1:<,::,;11 '","";', >,-'" ,,)':f~~;';', "" 'Y, '.' ;;~~': ,:,~:',::i')':ll ',:!":<: ".' ,:'i:;';::::,:'r~" , .' I f: '~::: ::':'~);/;11: :::,~! , " j 1'> I tl;):': j 1, "t~~~' 1;IJ ~I:"l:';;< "" "(f,, "'!....< 'I! l'l'i ._ "' ,,,..1. ~, -' , I "I "~, ':;d::::::; ':;~1:l<~~':' ":{il,i~, I ":';:~"" '<~, -<<.,'...;, J' -, ,-, ' .; n , . i, ;::,;";,,",;','!::,:..,,~,;,;:':i~::";:',':;,,~; - '. - l:'(:fl( ',! ' ' . " > ,'C;;;;;: I' " ',' , :;,:' !';;:;'~~ ~l; :' " ,.:, ",: t: ;:.::':,;, ,:~,~~f:iRJi:J';":",;: 1:, I . ,t~""'<,k' ,," ,,,,' r;:;:::;:.,1';';:};'~0:':,: ,~,:};~:~':: 1. 'il-.:': "';:::::;;;;~:;'~f"" '\1"" ' h, , " !:- :'!if I,' ~ ' , l l' I ,.;,: ,:,' :' !" .'::')<::;1'.. ': ,"l;1 i" , ',"- '/'~''''' " "'I"l ~i;;:~~;~;,fi~j, ',-< , ,-sr II<tl'.',ll ,<,1'1', 1-" ",,' ,""'i' i' ""':11"::1' ',ii' .",,' 'I [,~;::~i;:,,':;::::;':,:.ip;.g;: })';:,[:':;::I ,>:1',,'" "', , l,t ...., j'HD' """"""i ,. ,'I' '-':''- \i ','. " ~"+ ,. ~;., '. .,... . -. ",' - ." . ,,::;., : (:,f,~.,,: f~:~RQPO~~.'?:~~r~ND~'f.UR~~;!,~Y D.E~ARTMEI~H / (:ATEG.<)RY 'j '. . , :''- ;,$. .:' /, 'j' .". 'C,,', 'Fiscal Year2009 - 201-0' \ .' .' '.' ~..o . _ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~ 0_ ~ ".. ". _ _ _ ~ ...A~ __ 01100 City Council 86,248 02000 Boards and Commissions 14,736 03000 City Clerk 683,789 366,921 844 04000 C'ty Attorney 1,524,013 445,805 1,560 05000 Administration 1,580,098 145,612 1,770 06000 ITS 2,327,914 660,156 57,479 100,000 07000 Human Resources 2,107,601 1,747,310 3,367 08000 Finance 2,975,784 183,871 4,365 09000 Non-Departmental (621,675) 180,080 0 652,321 8,688,551 10000 Gen Svcs/AnimaJ Care Facility 1,740,468 592.779 62,778 2,429 12000 Planning & Building Services 3,473,883 489,262 13,653 130,730 14000 Police 40,587,231 2,821,823 421,806 81,669 , 15000 Fire 19,021,737 1,831,373 202,473 172,216 N 16000 Public Works 19,177,012 3,668,049 3,371,365 179.175 0 If' 17000 Recreation 3,586,956 549.961 476,349 3,817 18000 Library 3,877,859 881,802 374,697 357 100 GENERAL FUND TOTAL 103,173,440 14,665,788 4,993,950 1,050,498 100,000 8,860,767 221 Gas Tax 3,869,200 225 Traffic Signal 15.000 1,067,000 227 Transp Sales Tax Fund 1,429 11,911,875 231 Workers Compensation 539.840 2,919,019 232 Flexible Spending 'Account 310,000 236 Development Serv ces Fund 4,606,280 131.008 5,957 8,488 1.079,559 241 Parking Meter 8,668 225,636 19,487 165,940 120,000 245 Traffic Safety 4,000 534,140 251 Supp Law Enforcement Serv fun 111,406 252 Parce Dept Grants Fund 2,638,866 362,282 5,602 329,621 253 Inmate Welfare Fund 20,000 254 Local Law Enf Block Grant Pro 199,938 24,922 256 Asset Seizure 100,125 261 CA Library Services Act 25,000 102,644 267 McCandliss Memorial Cult Arts 400 1,200 272 Federal Grants Fund 101,335 62,320 169,904 95,000 ",,-,...,.-""''''" ~,464: )4ic3.~ ~O~1_~~j)~ . ,971.J!,9:" : :.~(t?7480 ~cS1~_M!i6~; ~858~?79" 7;:i;!64~oio} _~~~.Q'177 ;:::'2:~911)54.J D.,,4)Q.7-:-527~ :, "-43.91 2!>2TJ :-~2 !:2-2~ ~~s:- 1':26,395322 , ri;;r:~iE 132,844,443 e.3"a69,~oo:g ;~1,Q~?,Q.9.o . . iI,913,3Q1 : ~~~~~JI~~ >~,~1~?91:' . .,:):i9~t~.i ~~~{lH~~~ r~~~~;~~0~ C<..-,,,,,.,...._" _ .ce, i~-;; 224,~6Q~ ~--'o-_'" ,_ ._._.......... ~1'i::..::.1 OO;125~ ~[~~?t~~~1~ " 1-600 ~:~t:;2~559:'. :~~ ~~~r~"~r;'; ': ~J{!3P~S:~P-:i:~PE~~.IT~:RES' '~Y~ar:~~~'fM'~NJ l CATEGORY,,' .,.. ". .' :: . ::' . :t." ,,~.:,. ;'; .. FiscaIYear2009-2010. , ~ ,,. _..3 ~. . , .,. . ~ "- ~. . _ __ _ " ? 274 281 282 285 301 311 313 314 315 317 321 333 341 342 343 344 345 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 361 362 363 364 365 367 368 369 371 ARRA Fund Waste Mgmt & Recycling Environmental Seryices Energy Conservation Storm Drain Revenue COBG Housing Program CV Housing Authority Emergency Shelter Grant Prog RDA Housing Program Redev Low & Mod Income Housin HOME Program CDBG FYOO Public Liability Trust CFD 11.M RHR McMillin CFD 12-M Otay Ranch Village 7 CFD 13M Otay Ranch Village 2 CFD 12M Otay Ranch Village 7 Bay Blvd Landscape Dist Eastlake Maintenance Dist 1 Open Space 0 strict #1 Open Space District #2 Open Space District #3 Open Space District #4 Open Space District #5 Open Space District #6 Open Space District #7 Open Space Distr'ct #8 Open Space District #9 Open Space District #10 Open Space District #11 Open Space District #14 Open Space District #15 Open Space District #17 Open Space Distri~t #18 50,139 405,224 62,617 828,806 298,203 599,511 37,887 256,850 51,400 42,800 227,280 12,723 38,000 82,687 283,221 200 305,003 2,060 230,772 55,964 8,911 18,600 57 202 43,680 16,705 5,555 42,322 42,737 49,360 111,311 206,451 20,339 5,100 64,616 805 581 15,540 128,000 142,220 6,967 82,501 26,158 3,982 17,405 23,631 12,342 9,427 4,761 20,884 25,057 22,018 39,033 124,850 8,179 560 46,596 627 24,592 8,000 20,000 451,304 95,221 795,146 290,463 96,000 400,000 55 156,569 4,394 83,804 1,192,000 81,000 361,701 1,800,000 12,381 71,569 4,017 74,500 5,846 59,687 15,200 2,691 7,622 13,952 10,382 5,544 3,183 11,183 13,090 12,562 27,847 56,432 5,843 2,088 19,285 3,920,000 115,569 7,000 768,471 1,461,550 6,000 604,922 ~',~;;:81i738~~ "'o.~.2_,,-',.._~~ ~-illt~~ ~~'-.--"""'-'-'.' ,",'1;:548;1)~;f ~, 54,7,400::; fY", -1 028 '23'0;:; '". _".___' .t I: ~8.8:19.8~ IC' '3,920,000" ""~'''~'<''''-''-'--'.'-'"'-'' it~:;~I~;i ~t:t~~t~ r;: 11,q,,60B-, k;,;:i.482,790 :' ~;l~j r;::NJ~2" ! ',__ ".1 5,5843 : _~::-[4~'627-:; E:\. ~;_~~it~= i~;,,~~,~04:; ~t~~~;~~~~] EJ:~-;;;:1;(389~, ~:~~~~884~ 11-"-,,,,-j83,~~ , t ",' 1 z8~191S f!I~H:~~ e::.:.: 1.36;~i': ,., ".':';" "r:" ,:,PRORO"SEq,'ExPE'NDiJURES'BVjJEPARTNfENT /CATEGORY"'.--'-'- --,'co' 1;'.! . ~., _ ~~ 3 f)> . o. . , . .: -' . ~ ... " ."h':,!'4-;".:i;,.V''''.!..:':',~, ::.,....,~.,'i: "y ::F1~ca/,f.~i!r2q~9-~{J!O., _> , __ .' ,', , , 372 Open Space District #20 844,804 307.678 203,580 373 Open Space District #23 39,759 8,665 9,409 374 Open Space District #24 12,007 11,395 4,465 375 Open Space District #26 6,898 3,031 2,706 376 Open Space District #31 71,921 46,211 21,071 378 CFD 07M-Eastlk II Woods. Vista 321,615 128,171 166,090 379 CFD 08M,Vlg 6 McM & Oty Ranc 491,088 246,913 197,010 380 CFD 09M.OR Vlg II Brookftd She 567,530 204,146 154,864 382 CFD 99-2 Olay Ranch Vlg 1 West 458,855 155,228 106.014 386 Otay Ranch Preserve 829,241 42,024 387 CFD 98-3 Sunbow 2 656,543 206.764 148,285 388 Community Facility Os! 97-1 OR 1,526,637 385,292 328,012 389 Otay Ranch Village 1,2,6,7,12 58,354 29,561 17,001 ri 391 Central Garage Fund 910,174 3,122,228 1,800 400 108,000 ,. 391 Equipment Replacement 18,326 500 64,200 393 Technology Replacement 7,382 401 Bayfront Trolley Station TDA 57,000 19.000 26,679 402 Transit CVT 356,365 745,895 185,030 256,059 92,321 413 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 917,000 414 Sewer Service Revenue 3,980,787 19.151,821 6,961 6.831 575,958 3,263,737 115,000 428 Sewer Facility Replacement 174,258 700.000 431 Tele Gyn Sewer Basin DIF 35,000 432 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DIF 10,000 433 Salt Creek Sewer BaSIn DIF 74,091 250,000 441 1994 Pension Obligation Bond 2,500 2,506,688 442 CDBG Section 108 Loan 734.471 446 Notes Payable Adamo Property 48,113 448 2000 COP Ser A-Fin Project 5,000 1.862,522 449 SD Co Regional Comm Systems 295,734 450 2002 COP Police Facility Proj 5,000 3,910,746 451 Long-term Advances DSF-City 300,000 5,300,000 452 KS Fire Equipment Capital Lease 172,216 453 CES Loan Repayment 194,000 471 2003 Refunding Cert of Part 5,700 1,065,066 l$iR,f""T".><..-.....'?1 ,:!""q~<3.,Q22.:.:J ~::~;~.~f:i~~ -..,,,. -. -..,. --~ .~, ~~,;:1;:T?'(~3511 Ellf1-3~i?~j E~-::615:876'"1 ii;~f~~~~9~IT~ ~ i%~:~10~~! ",' 720.097" ~::"-8i1l65 ~ t~?1:01X,592~. I' c 2 - "9' - ,,;;_,21~,__41.-.: 1'''7;;: 104,9'16' ~'~-"""'" -"'~-'" ~_1iT42c,~0.3 ~ ~' ;"'",,8..3,02~ ~ ~:i~j:,~:~7~lli ~'~:~~~~~~ ":,~:~91 t, biiili' .-"~"._....--._->'<.~ ~'27:10{095" t~.~8j~.~8S '::;: .-,35,0,90:' ~".i'1~:OOO-= L -"32~:Q9.:t::: [ill6_~'c~~J k;7:"::..(~.4)~Q r'i"~:Z~}1{33 ;:!;,:.1,86i:5?D ti{~~i~;~~~_~ r::'::-5,\i,qo:Dg,o,;; ~~~~l~~~ "-:: .1;9:70-;766', ~ .. ~. ...." '.. Q . ., . - ~ - - - ~ . ...~~ j :',~-;:ij',(i~',';':I.P~gPq~J:D.~~P,Ia~pl.!rU~.ES',BY D,~PA~\fMEN;r I LAf;EGQR,Y " " , _h... ?", :.. , . ; FIscal Year:20mJ". 201'0' , >~ " . A~ _, _ _... ~ _ ~, ~ _ _ ~. _ _ _ 472 2004 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase I 473 2006 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase 2 515 Twin Oaks Ave AD 96-1 Imprvmnt 3,680 516 Oxford St Ad 97-1 Improvement 3,854 518 AD2005-1 Tobias Drive 60,000 542 Tele Cyn Drainage DIF 1,250,000 567 PFDIF-Adamo Prop Acquisition 48,113 572 PFDIF - Civic Center Expansion 2,392,502 573 Police Facilities Remodel 1,736,633 574 Corporation Yard Relocation 1,098,290 587 Otay Ranch VLG Ped Ramp DIF 43,000 588 OR VIg11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF 3,200 591 Transportation DIF 211,000 580,916 5,300,000 2,845,000 ~ 611 RDA Town Center I/Bayfront 318,750 400 690,558 3,617,293 875,000 'C' 651 So WestITwn etr II/Oty Vly Prj 612,947 310,700 100 2,358,248 5,946,932 150,000 653 RDA 2008 TARBs Project Fund 800,000 689 2000 TABS (Merged Rda Project) 515,000 691 Long-term Advances DSF - RDA 1,405,000 2,782,842 693 05 Tax Rev Bnd A (eRA/ERAF L 100,569 694 06 Tax Rev Bnd A (eRA/ERAF L 125,632 695 06 Sr Tax Alloc Ref Bond Ser A 5,000 1,068,545 696 06 Sub Tax Alloc Ref Bond SerB 5,000 1,045,199 697 08 Tax Allocation Refunding Bond 963,636 715 Park Land Acquisition Fund 25,000 2,000,000 717 Resident. ConstrucUConver Fnd 679,242 723 Bicycle Facilities Fund 266,220 736 Other Transportation Programs 1,402,000 3,690,234 739 Traffic Congestion Relief Fun 348,000 741 Prop 18 Highway Safety 3,385,407 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 118,356,993 49,113,818 7,727,919 33,612,108 1,853,808 55,197,467 30,443,302 150,000 150,000 2,396;117 :1 ,- .."..::.,;,'71 8',:199" c6[O~ -i.:j)'~"iJ ~C<6O:00o;! G~?25o.'o66~ [l~:ti~::ll@~ ~"'2:~i2:5~f~ :;'1,n6,63) ~~;~{1 :Q.98;?jp ~ ~F:,:;.:i3~609j ;::,< _ ~,20Q.; t~f~93~~16' :"::5,6,52,OQ1. ~~:~;rt'9',528,927~~ t.;:::'.:"" 8000~ ~'..=>L...' ~.. -' ,.~......-. ~:~l,~~fffi f ':"1i!Q,56~" ; .-:'12'5,632"', ;;;::::'"-.''''-::::7'~7~':-;;; ~.~:J,073;~4,?ij [~~1;g5Q~g9ii f,~i7:-96~,6.36~ r;;::C02~dQo"c tt;ye:61~,i1~ ~.J6E,~2}O~ ", 5,092,234, I' ~;!131~,q,OQij E:~~3,38,~,~ :; 2,640,500 298,945,913 ,O!1"'tt7 ;;':;"" ~'J A~, 711":'~.!t II "!~";"~'I,j 'I'" l'l !;, Ii "::r:~1 11' ill ~l4.....,l:; iii :.;""i,'gi" t 'j'r !h~;V!' /"-,\ PR.OPOSIED BIUDGIET IF~SCAIL VIEA~ 2009-~ij SCHIEDUllE OF REVIENUIES -213- '~:. ~,: < <, - {'c ~, - ',~E'4 '~.; .~ -;"~, -""~~" " ;p , ~'~~.' "p..,~.~.~. , y}'- -tv "-r't;.;-" ,'" "r " , " ,~,)rJ"~' v~ !:, ;,,..........,,Jlt , "L'~ll'" ":-~--t;r: f ;_ '\J4" It ;<:' ' i',;;'J!J:'!" t., ;~ ",,:,W. .',-;J'R . . ',-i:"nlJ'':'"'' '~" ~" ': " ,'~ .-, I.: . . :',"~' ""?','~>'I.,~."~" :' .:....x..."$CHE'OU1EOF.REVENU'ES' ' " , .,':':. 100 GEN'ERAE FI!.INO'" '.,', :.: "',' ", ' 30.0.0. 30.10. 30.20. 30.30. 30.40. 30.50. 30.70. " 'f' 310.0. 3120. 3140. 320.0. 3210. 3240. 3250. 330.0. 3310. 3320. 3330. Properly Taxes Property Tax TOTAL 22,192,789 26,667.759 $22,192,789 $26,667,759 26,715,515 28,827,392 9,492,759 8,813,064 6,363,446 6,981,762 1,234,912 1,237,316 2,336,20.4 2,551,570. 2,122,860. 1,423,599 $48,265,696 $49,834,703 117,381 129,833 2,697,584 2,198,700. 40.1,576 402,0.0.1 $3,216,541 $2,730,534 458,749 536,687 168,90.0 261,611 30.7,647 30.2,480 208,893 214,484 $1,144,189 $1,315,262 279,277 769,851 361 0. 11,182 51,844 123,365 10.5,60.6 Other Local Taxes Sales Tax Franchise Fees Utility Taxes Business License Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Real Property Transfer Tax TOTAL Licenses and Permits Licenses Dev I Improvement Permits Re9ulatory Permits TOTAL Fines. Forfeitures. Penalties Community Appearance Penalties Law Enforcement Penalties Parking Penalties Other Penalties TOTAL Use of Monev & Prooertv Investment Earnings Sale of Real Property Sale of Personal Property RentallLease of Equipment 29,30.6,623 1,,;:::;-29,232:()()5][, '["2'1f1SS"."440] $29,306,623 $29,232,000 $27,199,440 28,304,989 9,662,517 7,378,30.1 1,237,322 2,697,286 795,606 $50,076,021 123,393 2,0.51,184 522,760. $2,697,337 690.,194 299,199 308,250 222,074 $1,519,717 1,255,159 154 54,549 91,175 1.:...::..26:890DDQjL '; ,-'25:545,50o.J ~:()330()Olr ,:';q(),D3~60DJ l~, .:7~LOQ2JL:8;1~ 144J r'? ,1;T96,DDo:lI ,'1'(1, 190:600.1 t . ;"'2;57D,DD.2:::fv' 2;602,51:;0 ~''''m402"'[~;~i414D2'' ',> > "~~-,,.. $48,946,402 $48,381,560 L,,:,:::...,~,O~l :: ' )32,6DQ.J ,~~-,;,,<~,~-_.,,- "''''":n':'~~-:-:r-'-'T>C'''''-~-''''''':'' I' ,"" ,159,931:;,1, '. ",227,220. j !',' ;,"';:530;2!J.Ut':': . ',52D,DDo.j $820,283 $879,820 ''''';1';477 ,3421 , ',"}?6,55,0] ..:99Bf :7'326",'40.01 ,,' 178,jlOD ;IL"'. 219,40D,j $2,231,468 $2,379,692 :-M'i:W5:364 ~ , , 0.:] _~;",,"~.~.'"c.l '-;:" 3D';'@0 ", .:80.,94,0. ,. ';'" ,,~. ", '" '. ' . '". 'sC'::HnJUL-E OF REVENUES .' ,.---:'., -,- --: ~~- ~ 'I' 3010 3400 3440 3460 3470 3480 3500 3580 3600 3690 3700 3720 3730 3740 3770 3800 3820 3830 3840 3900 3950 3970 4200 4300 Rental/Lease of Land and Space Rental/Lease of Buildings TOTAL Revenue from Other Aaencies Sales Tax State Grants State Tax Sharing Motor Vehicle License Fees State Subvention-Booking Fees State Reimbursements Federal Grants Federal Reimbursements Other Agency Grants Other Agency Revenue TOTAL Charaes for Services Zoning Fees Document Fees Plan Checking Fees Inspection Fees Other Dev Fees Animal Shelter Contracts Information Systems Services Services to the Port District Youth Center Utilities Reimb Recreation Program Fees Class Admi?sion Fees Referral Fees Staff Services Reimbursements Fees for Other Services 777,551 797,928 275,999 18,354,839 305,049 773,879 2,656,964 97,138 46,110 1,330,798 $25,416,255 8,162,093 45,301 1,951,512 168,880 16,595 8,930 12,114 544,810 35,181 836,950 360,164 68,902 1,999,799 1,023,739 779,959 347,927 278,746 17,676,035 o 139,729 4,112,263 115,352 148,733 1,333,531 $24,932,275 8,391,778 30,378 1,907,116 162,324 31,276 257,120 3,362 690,963 20,918 1,157,313 558,680 359,849 1,993,134 694,876 757,366 1,329,998 288,071 19,796,531 o 4,201 1,686,842 65,394 401,298 1,704,993 $26,034,694 6,196,145 73,680 1,429,625 208,203 11,840 683,392 1,541 675,378 20,262 1,011,959 530,402 347,876 2,110,668 1,170,099 $4,058,523 r~7~i,07f Ie ~69o.,'Z,171 !.,' " " .~81,9-i41"~ , '441',0601 i',",.'t 282,800:11- ".,'1;;271,488'1 ""-,~-"""",<"",-"-",,,-,--,",>,,-,;~-~...,-,,..,,-,,--,---...I;;.I (:_~81~[.'~~B-637] t-.~ ~"';fm_ .0 Ill';, "-:r::oJ ,.. , I ' , 6934'11--- .. ' '3 9..~5:1 L"..~,"':~-:._":-:"",,,,'...........;....;;< ''':;"c.~_,;:+.,,:,,~_; ,- ~:<,,~_.-~."'._" ,.,..-----.,...~---::_'l i ',; ,1,60.9,24 ,,-1,239,726 I -64,,100 $24,740,682 $21,021,968 !;~~i44.7'f1:1F~492~3381 E'" ,,',~5,3831r: .4fill.:J ':"'f': I, 88,407:J ",,' ,156,9041 ,,,,,"'" .. '~---.......;"h">"....----..-.,,,,,,, ";'," "f1Too 1'96,428 o \ TO. - 0 __ _ _ __ : ", ," ;. ' ~';" '0 ; : ., "SCHEDULE OFREVENUIiS ' , , ' ;: . J' . _ ~ _ _ -" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~_ TOTAL Other Revenue 4410 OIF Reimbursements 4420 Transit Heimbursements 4430 Redev Agency Reimbursements 4440 Open Space/Assess Oist Reimb 4450 CIP Reimbursements 4460 COBG/Home Reimbursements 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4600 Assessments 4700 Collection Charges 4800 Sale of Goods 4900 Other Revenue ,(, TOTAL -;.J Transfers In 5221 Tlr In from Gas Tax Fund 5236 Tlr In from Oev Services Fund 5245 Tlr In from Traffic Safety 5256 Tfr In from Asset Seizure Fund 5261 Tlr In from CA Library Service 5262 Tlr In from Public Library 5282 Tfr In from Environmental Serv 5294 Tfr In from Sewer Service Rsrv 5301 Tlr In from Storm Drain Rev 5313 Tfr in from CV Hsng Authority 5333 Tlr In frm COBG 5391 Tfr In from Central Garage 5392 Tfr In from Equip Replacement 5393 Tlr In from Tech Repl Fund 5395 Tfr In from Central Stores $15,234,970 1,359,035 762,460 4,406,759 1,822,198 4,333,556 1,567,320 2,614,407 3,693 150,673 57,385 2,489,702 $19,567,188 3,858,092 o 527,984 o 74,612 70,647 o 8,581,664 1,357,355 147,000 232,235 31,188 2,400,000 1,000,000 o $16,259,087 1,334,226 820,427 4,319,107 1,783,469 5,024,531 1,275,441 1,760,684 3,695 220,912 80,677 2,166,646 $18,789,815 4,167,878 o 513,600 134,341 70,670 128,454 o 9,056,172 309,690 o o 32,124 o o o $14,471,070 840,313 362,818 1,984,951 2,067,069 4,665,576 1,053,480 1,567,531 3,694 256,155 72,524 4,315,062 $17,189,173 4,269,058 o 534,144 o 29,110 2,000 o o 238,528 o o 32,124 o o 71,313 ,~ $6,669,109 $7,546,077 '.. "316'5f13f,2'-'..,1287'176:! ---~,!....:....J-~"'--_'. .".." 262,38'01[:: ~258,747 J ';';,,::,"768,520 U,' :~~J ,::71,873:26' :997,1;J':J;: ':::..i.2946;98 ,..,~,2~ ,......T"'.~ .. . '-''''''- . >, ,::;402,274,,1 '" "" 28,188,J L.....Jl, ?J13.~L;.L _1:948~6m tl, ;w,;::' 36@b':~~"'ol ['.~.. ' 278:55QJ[.::.c-''200;~0'(J" l::.:J:~o1Jli, ~ ",:.:..:2.3501 r" -, -, -, -.""," ,,- =. ":',;'.'2,505;693 ~L" ":1,508,~86 't $12,158,554 $11,435,961 Lcr.-4,269,2~r:;:-:--3,~,,?@ C:,:.;J,~~2,~2~L"._.: 1,079;5~J r~"'-:::::5Wi 40 :lh:::;'-;' :534 .-141)"1 [' '.. :'120'o~6(j'21(:.. :.. '.. 0:'1 _~ ---'-"''"-1..------'--- __. 25:06 -2'5,000' .' .", c '~\" :.::.': ," :,-, ';.; SCHEDULE 'OF REVENUES . .~~ ",' d~' , - 5402 Tlr In from TransiUCVT Fund 5414 Tlr I n from Sewer Service Rsrv 5575 Tlr In from Lib East Territory 5611 Tlr In from RDA BFfTC I 5651 Tlr In from SWfTClI/OV proj 5691 Tfr In from L T Adv DSF.RDA 5714 Tfr In from CIP w/Fiscal Agent 5723 Tlr In from Bike Facilities Fd 5733 Tlr In from Swr Facility Repl TOTAL 119,767 0 0 0 0 4,560,008 2,154,748 4,000,000 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 391,311 0 0 31,734 0 0 281,079 267,053 0 $21,274,416 $18,679,982 $9,736,285 $11,058,308 $12,219,604 $157,809,965 $161,564,721 $153,938,093 $139,915,329 $132,844,444 TOTAL -100 GENERAL FUND <1 9' 220 TRANSPORTATION FUNDS' . "- . -' " ~ 3010 3300 3440 3500 3770 4440 4450 5000 Sales Tax Investment Earnings State Tax Sharing Federal Grants Other Dev Fees Open Space/Assess Dist Reimb CIP Reimbursements Transfers In 4,200,000 526,006 3,984,265 (13,096) 1,895,618 o o 21,694 $10,614,487 TOTAL - 220 TRANSPORTATION FUNDS 3300 3760 230 . DEVELOPER DEP'OSITS ..' Investment Earnings Other Dev Fees 3,210.000 875,065 4,075,451 67,657 683,742 6,000 5,517 o $8,923,432 9,171,000 1,082,504 4,036,861 238,500 499,457 1,351 o o r~:.-;-'(5n;oaolr:'.' 1.1,827,655 i ['. ,H ./OJL~."-ol ,>,,,,,,,,,,-,,,,<,...-..._~,",,,,,,,.,.. .- "~-'<'--~;"'''-'' r~~:c:i"1~2:'7'161F,, G;.7~2')I6\ r' . ;"::',. 'Q'1[1' , N ; .. .0' j L~":':_.,.~".".,,..>~,-/.'..J . ,.."',......,,~,.,..,,,>,.~,.,_,,' [":'755Y2'41'][i'i "'2'50:0061 ;'"<'",, Ii. _ _,.,. -', t. ,-". .1 ,_< [....::.:. -0;1!;,,: :. ;' :0.1 ' ,-" _"~9"_'>""--"''',,_,,~, "_ "~""""",,,~"'<>_,'_,",-Ow.....;,d l~:~. ~..~ ~:~lS~:..T~:]~~ t: ._.................DtL. ~.,......... $9,270,957 $15,820,371 $15,029,673 TOTAL - 230 DEVELOPER DEPOSITS $0 o o o o $0 249,790 [-., ~. .li.~gJ!L. 2.,,0'] 12,244,884 r::::-:-:;~';;?O~r ;;'--:;'...-;-"0"':] $12,494,674 $0 $0 . . -.. -. .,. -- SCHEDULE Of REV'ENUES' - - . .. - -, - : ---- - , ~ - - - - - , -. ~ -. - ^ --- - --- - ,~ 231 VvORKERS"COMPENSA:i:'ioN': ~; - ,', ,': . ,;', 4480 4900 Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue 0 5,168 2,490,139 2,899,423 $2,490,139 $2,904,591 259.359 276,064 $259,359 $276,064 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 TOTAL.231 WORKERS COMPENSATION '23;1 IFLEXIBLE SPENpING'ACCOUNW - ;', - :'; " 4900 Other Revenue TOTAL ,232 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT 233 TAX REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES , 3300 4900 Investment Earnings Other Revenue " 'P TOTAL.233 TAX REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES 4,703 ~,h,'50:0Qii)'jr..)-" '-50,QQQj 3,045,598 g:'2,7,7,1,~'1TIIl"', ,2;-?7,Pj'j1J $3,050,301 $2,821,917 $2,821,917 265,866 F:l,;;, 31 0;000. J,", 'fc' ..'310;0001 $265,866 $310,000 $310,000 1<':" . """7""" :ii71F"'C...".....-''''i'1'1I 5,408 L~,..~~.~:.,~ 127,586 p;;:.. ;:'":"0'11 ,',~'" ';~"":bl $132,994 $0 $0 '" :~.' ':., ,,' " " .," :,:.' SCHEDULE OF REVENUES. '~, . - ',- .- . ~ i ::iIl.':.' <I"...."i.l1"',L, '\ . o~'jg , 'A..,,,, ...".~"t _ .", _'_ __ __''__ ~. _ _ _" ~ '. _. _A. '236 'DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES 'J... , - - - " N '? 3120 3600 3700 3720 3730 3740 3770 4200 4410 4430 4440 4450 4460 4480 4900 5000 Dev /Improvement Permits Other Agency Grants Zoning Fees Document Fees Plan Checking Fees Inspection Fees Other Dev Fees Staff Services Reimbursements DIF Reimbursements Redev Agency Reimbursements Open Space/Assess Dist Reimb erp Reimbursements CDBG/Home Reimbursements Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue Transfers In o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o $0 TOTAL.236 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 240 PARKING - " : 3160 3240 3300 3350 4390 5000 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o $0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o $0 $7,226,744 $5,858,031 Other Permits Parking Penalties Investment Earnings Rental/Lease of Land and Space In Lieu Parking - TC I Transfers In 34.083 59,668 4,982 260,226 o 1,908 $360,867 TOTAL - 240 PARKING 24,729 60,047 9,575 237,334 o o $331,685 23,209 73,339 11,051 238,611 16,160 o $362,370 :: .:.::3J~9Q1iJL.:_:~,OOQJ:I , '~276;o53jr;-:-:-:;7134~126l r ,- ojl ' ',-L - -OQ] ,;;,. , " ;1" ". .;;. '.- I,,"' ~ -- ..,-"...~._".._~._. ;-.,'.-"'-, ....:... ------",.~lj;:i1:9.:.;;L:~: 3~6~oOol . ,.0"T--;:;,' L ' ~-- 6] . :9;!i., "i>~' : gj $361,772 $568,126 ,'.', ";~,,~". . . '.: . ' ~ "SCHEDULE OF REVE~8ES . . . '.'. . - , .~. . ... -"_ _~ A~ _ ." ..... ~ .~~. '" ._~ ___ ~_'" __. ________ 250 PLJ~(IC SAFE'TV. " ',' '''. . . : 3210 law Enforcement Penalties 3300 Investment Earnings 3350 Rental/lease of land and Space 3400 State Grants 3500 Federal Grants 3690 Other Agency Revenue 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In 517,504 842,214 1,056,790 ,,4~, 14,654 36,079 71,684 0 0 0 485,752 0 434,864 122,887 191,549 2,281,967 187,034 234,461 415,807 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 $1,327,831 $1,404,303 $4,261,112 $5,409,337 $4,510,845 TOTAl,250 PUBLIC SAFETY " ~ ~60 LIBRARY/CULTURAL ARTS' . . . 3300 3400 3440 3500 4900 Investment Earnings State Grants State Tax Sharing Federal Grants Other Revenue 5,349 141,195 156,714 7,500 900 $311,658 TOTAl,260 L1BRARY/CUl TURAl ARTS 270 SUNDRY, GRANTS . 3300 3400 3500 4480 4900 5000 17,088 22,049 188,086 0 198,269 91,215 1,875 0 900 0 $406,218 $113,264 . ~:"""::Q:L ";~QJ I.k.:.... :..:.-;.. ....':~,.9JL }: ";"";:...,~.92J '~.- ""iooo r,,""'l:'1os:oool ' t......, :"';' Q;] .":':'..20q] $134,900 $105,900 Investment Earnings State Grants Federal Grants Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue Transfers In o 408,213 o 668,906 o 143,469 $1,220,588 TOTAl,270 SUNDRY GRANTS (37) 324,533 129,560 o o o $454,056 o 1,342,385 237,957 o 23,824 13,672 $1,617,838 $983,717 $1,388,297 '"'., < " ,'~...:. ,:. ~ . :\'"<SCHEDUL'E OF REVENUES . ,,:- . - - -^ - - - ~ -- 280 ~CONSERVATION ": .' . : 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 4300 4480 4900 Investment EarnIngs State Grants Federal Grants Other Agency Grants Zoning Fees Fees for Other Services Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue (111) 356,927 8,626 o o o 12,867 o TOTAL - 280 CONSERVATION $378,309 " " \' 301 STORM DRAIN REVENUE ' ' A _ _ . 3120 3230 3300 4020 4200 5000 Dev I Improvement Permits Environmental Fines Penalties Investment Earnings Storm Drain Fees Staff Services Reimbursements Transfers In 190,989 3,500 9,734 519,172 184 2,232 TOTAL - 301 STORM DRAIN REVENUE $725,811 1,387 (44,084) o 211,620 o o o o $168,923 115,163 9,300 (1,095) 548,360 o o $671,728 o 311,556 o 932,951 o o 2,243 2,786 $1,249,536 47,303 21,700 1,268 570,070 o o $640,341 $3,438,427 $2,119,170 r;";""13g:g;f5;~~:;-:'-;::25 Goal ~Jri~~:*:IOlL:-;:'~--;j;rr~~~<.:".6Ji L. ,,' :.~. .....;Q]' l... ~i..:...9 : L'~':"'<<17.151'" '" ,500060:;1 ;;;L;m:..-} ..::-; ;_,~;,~,_..L;.J,;...:LL~~,;--,-,-! ,......"",: FJ~~~r~":S2~I~ $580,660 $525,000 'b -" ': \.. ',., . . _ _ ~ . ~., : i',' '. : >' .:" 'SCHEDt'lLE OF REVENUI1S . '. ' . .. .. . ~ - - - ~ '- - - - -- -- 310 HOUSING PROGRAM' . ;' , " .' ~ ,- 3000 3300 3310 3350 3700 4300 4430 4460 4480 4900 5000 N '" \" Property Tax Investment ,Earnings Sale of Real Property Rental/Lease of Land and Space Zoning Fees Fees for Other Services Redev Agency Reimbursements CDBG/Home Reimbursements Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue Transfers In 1,968,228 156,381 o 31,294 o 42,047 o o o 10,020 4,038 TOTAL. 310 HOUSING PROGRAM $2,212,008 ,320 COMM DEV 'BLOCK GRANTS' ' 3300 Investment Earnings 3400 State Grants 3500 Federal Grants 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In 2,294,709 278,938 88.088 24,592 o 58,897 o o o 7,337 1,124 $2,753,685 2,758,665 493,834 41,604 20,866 32,367 63,083 352,934 273,013 o 142,436 o [:-::-2 696-5'8'O""!;,':"', ,7"" >:-:"~ O'j -"-'-r._,--",UU~~,,-<.- ~,_ e'f:j;f:T14~j3'r~-;:;j)1?;r.J7rJO:-~ F ' q=:23' '. .,,~ 0' ", '!"'~~3p~i$~ .&:IF__.__J r :~"'F 63 ';\421!J:,;""'''''63 '442 'j L~~.; "'_ ,-" - - ~ "'~ ."-.__ __r _., -, r ':":'572;QOOlr"'?':;6:io.60O: i !;. i'i:27l]OcilLzi" '.L356&t!J [r' '" ."" .'51!';",,''', '3000'0'] ;tf,'....o-_ "~,.;;;.,.\o;:;,..:;".,>,~,,,,,_..!...t.,,,,__;;.___',,,,,,,,",,,"__,, ~g~i~~~~:;~~~~;i $4,178,802 $3,900,931 $8,120,065 23,479 10,611 16,714 1,660,178 0 0 4,585,199 4,206,564 4,354,211 0 1,053 0 75 0 9,508,942 0 304,534 0 $6,268,931 $4,522,762 $13,879,867 $4,676,546 $3,870,965 TOTAL. 320 COMM DEV BLOCK GRANTS 5000 341 PUBLlCoLlABILlTY TRUST' " , o Transfers In TOTAL.341 PUBLIC LIABILITY TRUST $0 o $0 o b ~c:. .., r<B~: ) ,8.2Q",0@ $0 $0 $1.800,000 ~ ' - - ..- - - ~ . ,," r - . - ~ .' . _ _, , ~ __ , " ,', ~', ' . ' ,~.. SCH.EDULE OF REVENUES .', , ." - . - . . . ~ . M _ ___ _ _ _ _ ~_ ~ _ _ __ 350' OPEN'~~ACE D1s''r~lci " ""'CO:' . , 3300 4450 4600 Investment Earnings CIP Reimbursements Assessments 244,179 o 6,235,851 $6,480,030 483,662 o 7,022,578 552,998 29,880 7,541,213 $8,124,091 TOTAL. 350 OPEN SPACE DISTRICT $7,506,240 390 FLEET MANAGEMENT' '; " , ' "' _ I ." 3300 3320 4420 4480 4900 N '" t Investment Earnings Sale of Personal Property Transit Reimbursements Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue f~0;r;:i':;J'foflr;j;F~:;:%:-Z~. ..0 'j Pi: ;;:t';;~;;1Jf~O;1P;J0L":\,:::~1?, 611 f'7"";'l0:475;403"!f. ',\>11;866:649.1 ~. .._~.--' . '..-.... . , -=- $10,475,403 $11,866,649 157,631 97,740 92,548 29,524 0 0 784,103 724,983 781,048 41,465 36,177 29,827 3,762,777 4,364,737 3,803,624 $4,775,500 $5,223,637 $4,707,047 $3,530,978 $3,987,770 TOTAL - 390 FLEET MANAGEMENT 3300 4900 393 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT ~_ , Investment Earnings Other Revenue 46,550 (2,026) 2,072 539,700 269,851 49,697 $586,250 $267,825 $51,769 1,277 2,331 2,174 159,984 121,963 109,951 $161,261 $124,294 $112,125 TOTAL - 393 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT 395 STORES INVENTORY . . ~ . 3300 Investment Earnings 4900 Other Reve~ue TOTAL - 395 STORES INVENTORY $0 $0 $0 $0 '. .. l~{, ,~," :;7:~~~" ..~, '." , " ;':! :-:'1' 'SCHEDULE Of REVENUES ' . ,: ,'~ ~ ...._ A _ . . _ . .' _ _ ___ ~ __. ._ __ _ ,400"TRANSIT ',;."", ;, :.-', " ' . - . . 3300 Investment Earnings 3400 State Grants 3690 Other Agency Revenue 4300 Fees for Other Services 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In 78,606 167,735 184,751 4,190,049 3,677,603 5,303,878 0 0 74,640 2,526,486 2,433,007 1,660,821 0 131,967 316,059 23,523 0 0 $6,818,664 $6,410,312 $7,540,149 $1,727,168 $1,738,349 TOTAL.400 TRANSIT 410 SEWER " . ' . , - . . . N N '{' 3000 3300 3700 4000 4020 4040 4100 4410 4430 4440 4450 4460 4600 4700 4900 5000 Property Tax Investment Earnings Zoning Fees Sewer Fees Storm Drain Fees Industrial Waste Fees Pump Station Fees OIF Reimbursements Redev Agency Reimbursements Open Space/Assess Oist Reimb CIP Reimbursements COBG/Home Reimbursements Assessments Collection Charges Other Revenue Transfers In 150 614,598 o 26,150,042 o 9,190 27,806 o o o 135,622 o 6,076 303,802 o 4,689,364 $31,936,650 TOTAL - 410 SEWER o 1,339,325 o 28,100,484 o 7,775 20,307 o o o 113,524 o 1,938 257,948 o 755,579 $30,596,880 o 6,090,269 13,239 29,097,670 13 7,900 36,563 21,967 3,049 3,773 64,491 5,105 5,290 226,425 7,076 174,258 $35,757,088 lli~D[~~@l]b'rJ~ ',"!S'f;1 ;<-:,2.3 h"~1,09~~25l~Q9~ , ",,'';',::' :30,88.Qf][~,:',:10;880] ~'1'67;~~l~~752;348l ~.J:...., ,': '. ]][,'io., ' ;: 9 ~ f""'T.........,..,. _.~['.._.,~'1 ~. ~ "',",~:O _L /0 " 't"A~'O~ :,..," : h~: .qJ[ ..:.;,~ ,..:.::..0..1 ',l . ;;''4'5'66if1r;> .. :', " . .o"';,'j t,,.... ''';';'.-. ., _ ;:.J -<.". <:' . ~,-;" ". ,;.i ! ,.';~b".: ':,9JL ~.L,_~g J k:~~;[~i~:5:lp:~;l~~-_:.'<'~-Q;~ t, ';i~1QO,00gjt::' " .1"00:0"00] ,~-..r:l~::-::::rDlr: 7"'-'::,.~:0:1 ~: ".: ~;, C!.:lb.::::~.~~gJ ,:r:':!m~f'.':725TI66J fi;t:':" . ,,,,,',,lJ;1I;,,,,!: , :'K. ~0,1 ,.,.,.-..<>-"_______,~Itw..,~~~,.,.'"'_.._>,:J , .~":619:7.6i'f'!j[-!?1'74;258.1 $35,274,785 $31,403,277 ',; ;',,":-t...:.;:; ,~;':.. ;\~.;.:.~;,r ,";'CF~~"'~,:;J. 'rS'~,b~E'hi;I'i"i;: 'KP':'R'EV" EA~I-UErS- "',: ,; ,,' "-,. ."; :'" ,- ~.:- ,~', ';'~-. . . Of" ~ , ." f ~.~, a- ..-"~".. , ~'(;I I11ULI] \:.I . I~~ ' do" . ~'Alr",,-~~ :iI_... ".~ " _". :',..!'~J....-::'_ ""J~A" .&:; _il~ ~......... ~,~ <C..- "~_..)".,. ~._ ~?;. 'B_ ~ ~_ n ,__p'..,~: ,'- ___'__'~_ 3300 4350 - aGoT"SEWER' DII=:-'~',;J ~':>: "-'7 ~i' f:!W ~~ :., F~'J-:O;:, r ..:1 I ~ , _"'-0. ~ "II. _"A ... _ _ . ' II. ." _' 1'_ Investment Earnings Sewer / Drainage DIF TOTAL.430 SEWER DIF 3300 5000 ~440';:DS,-'CI:rYi,' "~' ,-~ :' , . 1r .'c;, "..; .,' ..' '''~.' '. . l . : :j, ~'_' :" . ." Investment Earnings Transfers In 289,715 1 ,516,499 $1,806,214 414,878 556,160 $971,038 465,134 539,136 " $1 ,004,270 " ';!O,' 220,290 $220,290 ,'" 0, ;'120,900 $120,000 TOTAL - 440 OS - CITY 479 'DS~'9VP:l'JBUCF.lNANCINJ3,,~~llHO~I~ ;" ,:., " " 'I' 3300 4900 5000 57 2,792,205 $2,792,262 60 2,724,679 $2,724,739 8 ,,9' , " 0" 3,855,348",:3:862,217;:,;'9:561,256 :' $3,855,356 $3,862,247 $9,561,256 Investment Earnings Other Revenue Transfers In TOTAL - 470 DS - CV PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY '500r: ASSESS DisT IMPR0VEMEf\fTS ,':. . .:' , :' 1_ ' _~ L .. _ .~ ~_~ ~'. 4; '_' ~.'. '. '. ~ _,' 3300 4340 4600 479,242 20,325,000 8,180,421 $28,984,663 613,854 o 9,500,218 $10,114,072 579,4 77 o 9,904,895 $10,484,372 ,....0 ",' "0, 1 0,M1,(iS3 ....-.,......",-",.';--".,"'--,--, '~W;~t: ,"" ~:Q> ;:::::.".,., ",',' -" :~:~::,:-,.".::O~ .'. .'10;4.12178, $10,412,178 $10,441,083 o Investment Earnings Transportation DIF Assessments TOTAL - 500 ASSESS DIST IMPROVEMENTS '542 'YELEGRAPHfeANv,ON DRAINAGEDW no -, ~'.... ; , - ,,~ '- ~_.-'--"'~ -- ---".;...: . "-- 3300 4350 5000 Investment Earnings Sewer / Drainage DIF Transfers In TOTAL - 542 TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF 54,158 95,694 125,171 2 72,175 54,165 $251,504 $149,861 145,256 259,977 537 537 1,801 0 $147,594 $260,514 103,734 o 28,874 $132,608 278,120 ',::, o o $278,120 j;,,,,'; "0 ...... ,0 2'8,472 $28,472 ()-,:j . ...<f':t8.472 $28,472 c<'/'-'" .'g:,,":.~:"", ;'>"{:,9,:::,~r(f .,',"<:'0 ' ,., '0 0: $0 -'i> "'0 " ::"~m;1:, ~,::;~j;~::::;jt~, ~:j;jj;~~g~:J;' i $0 ~,.C>;;~'l f'l=~'!, :..~~~{t,":';CiJ~:-. ...,' ~ ,.i}' .' ~,~,~ ,",:scIlEIDt3irfop:,REVE'I:'SIUES"',.y ".. ;o~,T 7-;;:-:-;-' :', :.~ '-:.~: ,"-~: l~i~.~ ~.Y._:..:::''J)'-.~~~~: ~='__i.... ~_..~~t''''' ~,...;_.~_':;~~ ...:_ '_~;"~c ,;,;;;..1____:_L~"'*' A':'_~'_~'::"" ~~. _:___~_:~~.._~'h--"-......J 560l''PIDSl'lI$ 'EAefitIJIESIDIF l"'{ !$t .'f'~:' n,f, ,..~~.';i"l'::i1" , ~,"" __"'_. _ ~~_ ""_' _.~1 3300 Investment Earnings 492,375 990,861 32.258 4330 Public Facilities DIF 17,934,536 2,130,561 2,861,465 4450 CIP Reimbursements 0 53,279 0 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 3,138,140 0 1,337,031 4900 Other Revenue 25,179 795,036 0 5000 Transfers In 7,289 560.905 0 TOTAL - 560 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF $21,597,519 $4,530,642 $4,230,754 ,:..~ " 6 6.8.54.~25. 811,250 0: ::." ,,:"':':' 0: '....: :...0':.: "0 l;l~l:l:~;;;W~ ~l iQ~' l ," <'>i~,~l{'t::>QJ:~ ., ~.248,20r .:5,3do;o~0. '580 PEDESJRIAN', BRiDGE 'DiF~ -:,. . ;''.. :-, -0" ,,~. ~-:: ;, - _ 'd ....... ~ II> .. "-_ '" $12,102,626 $6,111,250 3300 4380 Investment Earnings OR Pedestrian Bridge DIF 77,754 157.161 562,431 262,696 $640,185 $419,857 768,336 1,224,923 4,413,680 719,921 85,000 0 7,289 0 $5,274,305 $1,944,844 N " ';-J TOTAL.580 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DIF 590 JRANSp,0Rr.a;J:ION OIF ':, ~; '., " ',. ' _ ". ~. >>_" _--",--.~.. _"-. t_. ..... -" 0 '_. ... " 330.0 4340 4900 5000 Investment Earnings Transportation DIF Other Revenue Transfers In TOTAL - 590 TRANSPORTATION DIF 138,427 271,292 $409,719 1,171,546 471,713 o o $1,643,259 \thtS' a 42.1,178, $421,178 ,.,...."'..0 .-: 75.0,.0.00' :, ,:,::":~;:j:"'::;:!m'O:;; ,,:;,i80,oof $930,000 .:... d ;: 90,QOO, $90,000 '.0\ ,,75.0.00.0,'. ':- :n;};,t~t;::I' ,- 'I: !,!':'['cn,i . .;;402,000 $2,152,000 ~:~~-f:~f,.~~~~~~!~.~\;;;F~;,;~~:JI:If~:~~~~~~~~H~ED:tJjEE';Q~Rtv~Nr:lt~s;;'~." ~-.-',.:;I~ -;.?-~ c<,~:r"~-~:; - ,;:-,: ~-~"~ _ .. ~;Io:_ """J..~__.. _'" ",j.~.. '" l'lO.kllt ,~q..~~..U . "'., ~ ~;r-> _ .... .Jo __' ~__ _ _ _ . "'~___~i_~ ~__ _ ~______.._... -... ....._~~______ '606~'REDEVE[6PMENifiAG6Ne~ :~"!+e '\t:' c;,~' .i~~ ~ - ~', >". ,"" '" - ~ ~.~.. . ~~" ":,- _: . ~ . .. ~ 3000 Property Tax 3,876,643 6,076,772 6,353,413 3300 Investment Earnings 699,468 598,006 295,952 3700 7onino FF'F'~ 0 0 2,542 --.....;;). --- 3720 Document Fees 17 0 0 4360 Bayfront Fine Arts Fee 0 0 25,000 4430 . Redev Agency Reimbursements 0 0 1,793 4450 CIP Reimbursements 0 0 0 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 80,133 11,087 0 4900 Other Revenue 1,054,414 47,304 762,838 5000 Transfers In 263,708 4,000,347 0 TOTAL - 600 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY $5,974,383 $10,733,516 $7,441,538 N '" 'I' 670 SWTAxAGREEMEN>r~ . -. ~: - - ~' '---;--, :-:,' _,_ ."~"_, ""'""~ __ ,'n ____-L... _ _~ 1.....~ _'_ ....,,-, 3000 3300 Property Tax lnvestment ,Earnings 975,153 31,689 $1,006,842 1,237,035 56,789 $1,293,824 1,363,173 85,569 . $1,448,742 TOTAL - 670 SW TAX AGREEMENT '680 DEBf SERV - REDEV'AGENCV: ' '. .', . '. , . --'"-- ~~ ....." -- -- ~'- ,- ^ ... .-....~ ) 1,451,978 .. '132,60~ ':,': :' . b' , '0 . .' br o , :;':' ::,'" <'n m,-'-' ,;_' ..'d. . .,..... o. '''''",,:' .' 0: . '855'797 C....,.""_,.,.,.",,.' >_..<,''::; >><,., "/< -',v" $12,440,384 '_"_ ,_pc' o >H.'" ; 0 14, S25,385 << i'?$';OO,9,; .., .....'~.'O. ----c:"!i; >,:\,;',;;-0",: -"_U)>"'~'>', '.' ., ,.. '. '. '., 0" 0.. ''/-; '. ". ....: . 3q,9~~ .. . ,,,:.....0 ...t"8qii.iioo" $15,580,385 ~:,<>:',', $0 $0 3000 Property Tax 3,584,859 2,327,101 3,318,076 3300 Investment Earnings 209,870 386,439 269,202 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 0 257,507 7,665 i;t~tt: :.J 4900 Other Revenue 0 25,760,000 0 5000 Transfers In 1,081,010 17,373,176 1,492,586 TOTAL - 680 DEBT SERV - REDEV AGENCY $4,875,739 $46,104,223 $5,087,529 ..0 .., "~:!~:i:'74!QQ2_ ,- _________,<~_"__ 9c:o,'b; ,"" b". . ...a.47,~4? . .. $3,921,946 ... .;.0 o """""?""o" , '~~~t;~;l;:1' --.-,} o ~,9~4,423 . $5,984,423 "i" ;..,'! :~1':;'''':1'~ ',,"!;'h ~',::~ --.;!" ~'~,'!':\.;".";'S~H' 'EI;",I!:,I:~i; I'O'f,'!'RE"'1'E",",'I'I"E"S" ,;:,' , -,' -" " '-i ,.;'. H '-:c:" '- ~-f ~,~' '~J~.."'.'._-"":"O;"~~.'\::'.J:~. A".. ~_r._. ~:*2 .:::. ~,~_ ~-:~J:lJ-~~.S '~_.1 .><T ,!;.'^_I~.\:.!J~~_~_~_ _ _'-~_'_~~ ~,<\~~~,~__ =-~.:~:.j_' "?O~Oi.M.r~~.tO;(~TAA,p~9il~Q:ts~~;r..~~~:{.;:~ :'i,~i~~{ ,-::,;" 3060 Residential Construction Tax 668,761 393,650 151.325 3300 Investment Earnings 1,356.184 2,688,192 2,146.264 4370 Park Acquisition & Develop Fee 13,330.770 7,980,398 1 468,781 4900 Other Revenue 12.977 37,596 0 5000 Transfers In 17.223,884 0 1,102,129 TOTAL.700 MISC CAPITAL PROJECTS $32,592,576 $11,099,836 $4,868,499 ......::206.000 50.000, , 0.._ 0' j ,000090 ',': 5pO,goo; ,',,',::':}'o' ". Y",',' '0. 1 ..l""O, ...' 60000 " ,;~ ]!^~;:::~~I!;L ,':1::--::,',': ~ $1,200,000 $610,000 N '" <p ~ 3300 Investment Earnings 3400 State Grants 3500 Federal Grants 3600 Other Agency Grants 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transters In (45,920) 86,625 1,791,677 88,300 o o 3,384 TOTAL.730 OTHER TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS 415,642 2,108,082 23,837 o 59,662 8,290 o 115,623 4,047,734 205,145 39,661 2,769 o o !' 0,:, " 0 ..7,139,969 : 8,777,555~ 6,720,30.9 ",633,286': ...':'Jr,31ci ," 26:B~;: .", ';:'~"[i -,(rT :;~': '0:;;; li<:"--'- C- , "',,0 ,'....' $1,924,066 $2,615,513 $4,410,932 $14,001,588 $9,678,490 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS $342,606,160 $327,473,835 $312,802,698 $289,609,385 $289,987,631 -23D- ";' I' <;jl" i,.[ ",I, :'ill:,~~l\ I . HI ''';:~::P~!;','''~;:::~::::'::' \~\" :..'......t....L,""."'~:J -:r~,e .~~~~~ ~~I..~."'t,I>.'t':;:.o. ."--, "'y" r'" \l,_,~ ii 'If l~t',: ~"'""til fir ;'7! /. '), r-,("""'<r' 1'; ~,; It 1''1'' . 1<< lr~~ ",I ~ ..':. ;1 '!.:tJ', '110..... ,I 'll,..J ,~,"J 1, '.ll ;3 \..1' '. j , "! ':~i~. ~ .! l' ';~ C " f T , ~ 0 , " I' , , ~' ~.. . ." .. '. " ;" ..,< ',', , ,~ .. ,. .' . . , ~,." 'I;' .. .. PRO P IF~SCAi o SED YIEA.R fUND BALANCE PROJECTIONS BUD G 2 0 {] 9 -231- I i:,' ; 'U'".' '}~t~:!~j::;.. !~~~"" .. :"" ~. ,'. c.'c-' ^, '. ~', . : ":': FUND BALANCE PROJE~TIONS ~- ." . . .'''. -=- GENERAL HJND .' . - 100 236 General Fund Development Services Fund 9,301,845 o 132,844,444 5,858,031 142,146,289 5,858,031 (132,844,444) (5,831,292) t:'i9:30f8i5J ~:T2.6,1:i~ 9,328,584 TOTAL. GENERAL FUND 9,301,845 138,702,475 148,004,320 (138,675,736) REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & HOUSING AUTHORITY Tax Aareement and Debt Service Funds 689 2000 Tax Alloc Bond (RDA Proj) 942,655 942,655 (515,000) l"'i1. 421:6'55]1 691 Long.term Advances DSF . RDA (36,649,995) 2,782,842 (33,867,153) (4,187,842) l1(38;05!1i~~,!i)j 693-694 ERAF Bonds FY05 and FY06 163,211 226,201 389,412 (226,201 ) t::'(!<16}:?J!l 695.696 06 Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds (A & B) 3,581,776 2,011,744 5,593,520 (2,123,744) C:3:469;'1~ N 697 08 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds 20,397,955 (963,636) I:,') 9,434,;3,W '" 19,434,319 963,636 'f TOTAL (12,528,034) 5,984,423 (6,543,611 ) (8,016,423) (14,560,034) Redevelooment Proiect Area Funds 611 Redev BayfrontfT own Centre I (2,325,751) 5,822,162 3,496,411 (4,627,001) (1,025,000) t'12;'i5s;s9Q] 641 Redev Fine Arts 31,286 31,286 f!~H: '31'286] ... .~...._, 651 So WestfT~n Ctr II/Oty Vly 2,939,858 9,758,223 12,698,081 (9,228,927) (300,000) ~:1,::l,;1.2~:1,!5,1J 652 RDA 2000 TABs Project Fund 678,339 678,339 L':,'!'6'7a::i:i'91 653 RDA 2008 TARBs Project Fund 7,808,210 7,808,210 (800,000) rJt~ 7,008;210l 671-675 SW proj Acrea Taxing Agreement 899,212 899,212 om' 89g,?12:~ TOTAL 1 0,031,154 15,580,385 25,611,539 (14,655,928) (1,325,000) 9,630,611 HousinQ Funds 313 CV Housing Authority 353,559 1,352,955 1,706,514 (1,028,230) F'i( , 67S;Z84l 315 RDA Housing Program 3,920,000 3,920,000 (3,920,000) ~ - 'ill F' ." " "-. - - <,'" 317 RDA Low & Mod Income Housing 4,411,966 6,767,110 11,179,076 (1,541,430) :1":;9,631:5:46':1 ,~,'~~,,,, TOTAL 8,685,525 8,120,065 16,805,590 (6,489,660) 10,315,930 TOTAL - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & HOUSING AUTHORITY 6,188,645 29,684,873 35,873,518 (29,162,012) (1,325,000) 5,386,507 ~ .. ,', ~ ,.o~. ' ;FUNDOiuANCE PROjECTI'ONS' . . .' .. . , . .: - ~ __ _ -A __. _ _ _ ___ ENTERPRISE FUNDS., ' : ' . Transit Funds 401 Baylront Trolley Station TDA 0 102,679 102,679 (102,679) u 402 Transit CVT 0 1,635,670 1,635,670 (1,635,670) 403 Transit Capital Projects 179,586 179,586 TOTAL 179,586 1,738,349 1,917,935 (1,738,349) 179,586 Sewer Funds 411 Sewer Income 1,846,450 1,846,450 tJ,;~4~,~50t:i 412 Special Sewer 420,800 420,800 A-~;, ',~426:800'J 413 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 42,317,086 (917,000) rn-"~" 39,708,222 2,608,864 Ui1,429c9~:ii: 414 Sewer Service Revenue 8,135,622 27,101,095 35,236,717 (26,986,095) (115,000) hf; 8~135;622] " 428 Sewer Facility Replacement 1,641,320 1,693,318 3,334,638 (174,258) (700,000) 1....2;460,380". w f" t.:<"''''''~".'.,...,.,,--.......".;' 431 Tel Cyn Sewer Basin Plan DIF 1,045,764 1,045,764 (35,000) (Eii,1,o.1'o--;764..1 432 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DIF 1,432,128 20,000 1,452,128 (10,000) ~.:m. 1',4~.?;128\J 433 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF 226,537 100,000 326,537 (324,091) r:;;~"2'446;~ _,,,, ,. __n_.. . TOTAL 54,456,843 31,523,277 85,980,120 (27,529,444) (1,732,000) 56,718,676 TOTAL.. ENTERPRISE FUNDS 54,636,429 33,261,626 87,898,055 (29,267,793) (1,732,000) 56,898,262 SpECIAL REVENUE FUNDS , .' . Transportation Funds 221 Gas Tax 0 3,742,716 3,742,716 (3,869,200) E[, (1J..~484)] 225 Traffic Signal 1,231,151 250,000 1,481,151 (15.000) (1,067,000) ["Ci'~ 399'-151!l ~,-,..:..:......-"""' 227 Transportation Sales Tax 1 ,081 ,209 11,827,655 12,908,864 (1,429) (11,911,875) [[~._..c, .d ~5.?60':; TOTAL 2,312,360 15,820,371 18,132,731 (3,885,629) (12,978,875) 1,268,227 Parkina Funds 241 Parking Meter 514 568,126 568,640 (419,731) (120,000) 1 :d'- ': 28,909) "-"".",,,,,:'-;,.,..,.,-,,~...,.,, 243 Town Centre I.Parking District 23.912 23,912 I ;d: "'~ 23:91 ?~'i TOTAL 24,426 568,126 592,552 (419,731) (120,000) 52,821 r:I -, ~ ,. w _! _. ~ _ _ _ ___~~__~-. :"o', .. ,: --: : '.. ; " .. , ',.'.. ',.:fUND BAllANCE PROJECTIONS . . . . ~. - - - 1 _ "~_ _ ~ _ _ _.: _ _ _ __ Publie Safetv Funds 245 T ra!fie Safety 807,410 534,140 1,341,550 (538,140) 1:-:-#';,8,Ol&19:J 251 Suppl Law Enforcement Services 225,617 111,406 337,023 (111,406) r'lC7225,6\'7] 252 Police Department Grants 56,815 3,336,370 3,393,185 (3,336,371) 5!?']J6J 253 Inmate Welfare Fund 0 83,944 83,944 (20,000) '3,9~ 254 Local Law Enf Block Grant 9,969 224,860 234,829 (224,860) 9,~6E3 256 Asset Seizure 521,004 220,125 741,129 (100,125) [,:;~'iI311 ,qO~.::J TOTAL 1,620,815 4,510,845 6,131,660 (4,330,902) 1,800,758 Librarv and Cultural Arts Funds 261 California Library Service Act 129,312 105,000 234,312 (25,000) (102,644) !5:'i;~...lD6;66[J ..JiJ!CL;_, , 262 Public Libra", Act 1,011 1,011 1:<"1' ''',1;0'11"1 <,<>-......:J".,,_~>,w N 265 CA Dept of Education Sect. 321 2,353 2,353 F''''~:::'2;353'1 w 267 McCandliss Cultural Arts 14,288 900 15,188 (1,600) t...;::. J3:58,.!3j 'f' TOTAL 146,964 105,900 252,864 (26,600) (102,644) 123,620 Sundrv Grant Funds 268 State Recreation Grants 0 140,000 140,000 r' ~:'10;06iil " ',. , 272 Federal Grants Fund 0 428,559 428,559 (333,559) (95,000) [.'.,'" .OJ "'''''.Ji..:"..,..:"_.L.L..,-.,.,,., 274 ARRA Fund 0 819,738 819,738 (24,592) (795,146) f'....-,....;-,..'.i'J ;"i; "" ~~-''i'''' '-:' ..' __~O' TOTAL 1,388,297 1,388,297 (358,151) (890,146) 140,000 Conservation Funds 281 Waste Managernent & Recycling 0 390,362 390,362 (356,342) L'. ''',3i2.?2J 282 Environmental Services Fund 0 1,177,000 1,177,000 (1,120,584) r~D~56;416'1 285 Energy Conservation 0 551,808 551,808 (551,808) tee .0:: "'2] ;.",,---.:..~>,- - TOTAL 2,119,170 2,119,170 (2,028,733) 90,436 Community Development Block Grant 311 CDBG Housing Program 73,546 547,400 620,946 (547,400) f,;;;""""T73.5461 - - . .... '-" 314 Emergency Shelter Grant Prog 3,049 88,198 91,247 (4,394) (83,804) k':~,~,g,~@] E~' -'~ 321 Home Program 0 100,723 100,723 (100,723) -4-~"~-" <....J;,-~:O '~"",,~ 325 CDBG Program - Income Projects 48,766 48,766 f"jj,t!48;76[j ;:, ~. '.',' \' ~.',.t "~'~'..;' ~",'.'>FU~JD BA'LI\NCE PROJECTIONS " - '_ - . . - , _~ :-: 333 " w '" 342 343 344 345 351 352 353 354-376 378 379 380 382 383 386 387 388 389 301 FY2000 Comm Dev Block Grant TOTAL (1,168,172) (1,820,689) (2,066,472) ~,j;' 0,,1 (2,150,276) 125,361 100,000 225,361 3,134,644 3,870,965 3,234,644 4,096,326 Open Space District Funds CFD 11-M RHR McMillin CFD 12.M Vlg7 CFD 13-M Vlg2 CFD 12M. OR Village 7 Town Centre Landscaping Dist I Bay Blvd Landscaping Dist Eastlake Maintenance Dist #1 Open Space District #1 - #31 CFD 07M-Eastlk II Woods, Vista CFD 08M-Vlg 6 McM & Oty Ranch CFD 09M OR Vlg II CFD 99-2 Otay Ranch Vlg 1 We Town Ctr Business Imprv Distr Otay Ranch Acquisition Dis! CFD 98-3 Sunbow 2 Comm Facility 97.1 (Otay Rnch) Otay Ranch Village 1,2,6,7,12 TOTAL I :~ 6o;41l4JJ t,,:,,~5n473'1 ':.::',~<"c"..'.....-",<<" u.::=:. 37;322', I" - ;488;802 t . ..~" 2:H94': :32' 370:18 , 1', 3,0_9.~ 153~j r;~____..m_:__"..::~l :"., ic519,080J r:;-:-4 t8,529~l ~ i,'.,'958,847I L~,_,",..",,,,,...;..;;.,",,,,,, f"b63,646] r . ,., '7-,750;.' '"","~",...'"..~~./,;. r'''~37-6-8-1-9' I l...;' "ill r, ," 671,095"1 ""',...;,;...n<>......;.<..<._,,,.._ ~' :~9_~.fTh3J ~'_ 11, 60;143:1 .,.---<----......"..,""'--.....-..- 11,308,772 60,484 110,608 171,092 (110,608) 577,473 482,790 1,060,263 (482,790) 37,322 4,217 41,539 (4,217) 488,802 521,723 1,010,525 (521,723) 23,194 23,194 32,064 14,873 46,937 (14,873) 370,188 372,960 743,148 (372,960) 3,092,153 2,934,240 6,026,393 (2,934,240) 519,080 615,876 1,134,956 (615,876) 478,529 935,011 1,413,540 (935,011) 958,847 926,540 1,885,387 (926,540) 563,646 720,097 1,283,743 (720,097) 7,750 7,750 376,819 871,265 1,248,084 (871,265) 671,095 1,011,592 1,682,687 (1,011,592) 2,991,183 2,239,941 5,231,124 (2,239,941) 60,143 104,916 165,059 (104,916) 11,308,772 11,866,649 23,175,421 (11,866,649) 84,919 525,000 609,919 (548,118) Storm Drain Revenue ;~'T'6):86TJ INTERNA~, SERV)CE FU.NDl) _ 231 Workers Compensation 1,312,576 2,821,917 4,134,493 (3,458,859) 232 Flexible Spending Account 111 310,000 310,111 (310,000) 341 Public Liability Trust 0 1,800,000 1,800,000 (1,800,000) 391 Central Garage 627,470 3,987,770 4,615,240 (4,225,627) 393 Technology Replacement 7,382 7,382 (7,382) TOTAL -INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 1,947,539 8,919,687 10,867,226 (9,801,868) 'f"~"""-~''1 !w.", 675,634 ;j I' ,~. >,1,11"1 ,'"~-";,,,;~,.-,,., [:':+::';O:j f'" 389613,' "'.,~-io".,..<.,~.;,_..! i:-'r:~r:i];::~6;';,~ 1,065,358 , . .' '; ',,' : .: fUNDi BALANCE PROJ,ECTIONS . " :'-p - ~_I ~ - ~ . k '. _ R ~_ .. _ __ _~_ ;0.__ __~_ ~----'__ _ _~ _ C~PIJAI:.>PROj~cfs FUNDS. ' , ' Assessment District Funds 501 Otay Lakes Rd AD 88-2 Improv 95,924 95,924 ~'T95:924J 503 East H St AD 87,1 lmprov 126,839 126.839 ~26,839d 507 Otay Valley Rd AD 90-2 Improv 85,302 85,302 1.;-[I:,:?5,3-q~ 511 Otay Vly Rd Fee Recovery Dist 851,641 851,641 M;851,6411 512 EL Greens II AD 94-1 Improv 1,048,658 1,048,658 lli::jT6~:~!i~] 515 Twin Oaks Ave AD 96-1 Improv 14,300 6,347 20,647 (3,680) fi: i n;1K96j~ 516 Oxford St AD 97-1 Improv 8,562 2,043 10,605 (3,854) D'c '6:1:51~ n ....""""'....._.,.._. 517 AD2004-1 Dixon Drive 94,379 10,070 104,449 t.,.. <164"4493 ';:'~~- 518 AD2005-1 Tobias Drive 60,424 10,012 70,436 (60,000) L .;'10,436 : " TOTAL 2,386,029 28,472 2,414,501 (67,534) 2,346,967 w -;-J Develooment Imoact Fee Funds 542 Tel Cyn Drainage Plan DIF 4,349,871 4,349,871 (1,250,000) I..........~-B 'k 3,099,87.1 . 567-582 DIF - Public Facilities (2,912,004) 6,111,250 3,199,246 (5,275,538) E:J?J076;29,2)j DIF-OR Village Pedestrian Ramp 9,943 40,000 49,943 (43,000) 12'"'---1 587 ".;..:. "6943.' il..-i..o.:.;,;~;".,,;; 588 OR Vlg11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF 2,197,457 50,000 2,247,457 (3,200) I.; ,2-:-244,257,'J 591 Transportation DIF 15,698,353 2,152,000 17,850,353 (6,091,916) (2,845,000) Ii... 8,:~13,~3Z] TOTAL 19,343,620 8,353,250 27,696,870 (11,413,654) (4,095,000) 12,188,216 Mise Capital Proiect Funds 714 CIP - Fiscal Agent 1,121,875 1,121,875 i: ',1~121,81:5::J 715 Park Acquisition & Development 29,828,539 500,000 30,328,539 (25,000) (2,000,000) t ; 28303539'1 ~"}"N,---!.c..'M"...'..;; 717 Resid. Construction/Conversion 569,242 110,000 679,242 (679,242) f"!--'I '";;,,J;.2~,{: -h:";'.9'-- 725 indust. Development Authority 10,148 10,148 ~.1i 10:14sj <-<-,-----~"....;" TOTAL 31,529,804 610,000 32,139,804 (704,242) (2,000,000) 29,435,562 Other Transportation Funds 723 Bicycle Facilities 0 267,649 267,649 (266,220) 735 Transportation Partnership 16,911 16,911 736 Other Transportation Program 0 5,677,434 5,677,434 (1,402,000) (3,690,234) , ,.'. "',: '~~:: ~ : '~";.; .FUND' B~LANCE PROj'EGT:iONS- - - - -- . ~~ ". , - - - - - -- - ~ --- Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Prop 1 B Hwy Safety TOTAL (1,402.000) ~ , , 'JEjO' , L:". . ..: .",....:-,. l' i'/:,.a. -~:~~,~. _ 1:< ~3i69) ;O,!2U 4,294,598 o 3,691,058 3,707,969 348,000 3,385,407 9,678,490 TOTAL - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS 56,967,422 18,670,212 75,637,634 (13,587,430) (13,784,861) 48,265,343 DEBT. SERVICE FUNDS' _ ,: .' N '" 'C' 441 442 446 449 451 452 453 Debt Service - City Funds 1994 Pension Obligation Bond COBG Section 108 Loan Notes Payable Adamo Property SO Co Regional Comm Systems Long-term Advances OSF - City KS Fire Equipment Capital Lease CES Loan Repayment TOTAL 3,068 2,509,188 2,512,256 (2,509,188) L:'iYf3;068] 0 734,471 734,471 (734,4 71) I" 'I ~". "0] df':- ~' -1.;", ..:: ' c':_';;"&;:_,__,-"-:,,, 2 48,113 48,115 (48,113) r"~"-"n ,: ',,-, ,: ';'2' 174 295,734 295,908 (295,734) bh::.f' '~7~ (14,169,201) 5,607,534 (8,561,667) (5,600,000) bJt4;f61;6~m (172,216) !;;~~:<IJ 0 172,216 172,216 ;:;<.) "'i"''1'''t <0': 0 194,000 194,000 (194,000) [: . -'~: '2] """"~:":'~':'-'->- (14,165,957) 9,561,256 (4,604,701) (9,553,722) (14,158,423) 2,581,396 1,767,610 4,349,006 (1,867,522) I':: 2;481,481] -"""--<":'<"""""-~"-"'- 2,587,367 3,915,746 6,503,113 (3,915,746) r;;~2:587,3ill 1,489,985 1,054,505 2,544,490 (1,070,766) ['7'iT473'72Rj ~--=!....~ 2,395,951 2,396,117 4,792,068 (2,396,117) L:.d:~95;~?1J 1,322,150 1,278,200 2,600,350 (1,278,199) f';':~:322;::f51;1 10,376,849 10,412,178 20,789,027 (10,528,350) 10,260,677 (3,789,108) 19,973,434 16,184,326 (20,082,072) (3,897,746) 140,976,389 289,987,631 430,964,019 (265,862,113) (33,083,802) 132,018,104 Debt Service - CV Financina Authoritv 448 2000 COP Ser A-Fin Project 450 2002 COP Police Facility Proj 471 2003 Refunding Cert of Part 472 2004 COP Clv Ctr Proj Phase I 473 2006 COP Clv Ctr Proj Phase 2 TOTAL TOTAL - DEBT SERVICE FUNDS GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS ,~ " c, ," <'''bIt '1 /l' iq.%..,....1 ".r "'"'" af"'T-n""l. '. <;,q'lI/!l~! 1!, 'I 'lir ",,,,r,,,,, " ~"r:' '" , 'II. ,,, ,., C,,-, .., 1 "I ". .., . tl: ." 'I' 'I' i: 1" ,,~. "I ' ~,1.,1 l ,"- l' {' ";!~....;'~ :i ;::Ul2.cJe 'iii 1,J::.:V vi! -~, PROPOSED BUDGET IF~SCAl YrEAIR 2009-10 SCHEDULE Of IN1ERFlUND TRANSfERS -239- l.'" ';'~",';:-;:'-, ':" "scHED'uLEoF INT'ERFUNDl'RAN-sFERs',- ',-:- - " ',' -" - - - -- - ~ - - ,~oo 'GgNERAHUND ." .; - ,: " '. . : . . . ~ "''--.~ - . , . '. , , N .. 221 Gas Tax 236 Development Services Fund 245 Traffic Safety 261 CA Library Services Act 282 Environmental SeNices Fund 301 Storm Drain Revenue 313 CV Housing Authority 393 Tech Replacement 402 TransiUCVT Fund 414 Sewer Service Revenue 651 SWfTCll/OV Proj 691 L T Adv DSF RDA TOTAL TRANSFERS IN .100 GENERAL FUND Staff Time Reimbursement and Equipment Overhead Reimbursement Staff Time Reimbursement and Equipment Staff Time Reimbursement and Equipment Staff Time Reimbursement and Equipment Staff Time Reimbursement Overhead Reimbursement Transfer remaining fund balance to General Fund Staff Time Reimbursement Staff Time Reimbursement Overhead Reimbursement TCII,Bayfront. Merged Project Loan Repayment to GF '236 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES F.UND ' '. - - 100 General Fund 414 Sewer Service Revenue General Fund subsidy to Development Services Fund Staff Time Reimbursement ~""c, .-i340--:DOO"1 E:,"n' {;~~;0~2J 5362,050 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN .236 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUND 253 INMATE WELFARE FND , '. . 100 General Fund TOTAL TRANSFERS IN .253 INMATE WELFARE FND Grant payment reclassification F '..~63:941l $63,944 272 'FEDERAL'GRANTS'FND . '; -. ~ 100 General Fund TOTAL TRANSFERS IN . 272 FEDERAL GRANTS FND General Fund match for federal grant tli;; . " 3,!imt..l $34,679 . '~'.. :"',""... :. .': SCl{EDtiLj: OF INTERFUNO JIi~_NSF-ERS - ~ .. '_ ~_' ~--- '313,'CV HODSING !' ': ,',' . " .. ' . -- , ~ 315 RDA Housing Program 317 RDA Low & Mod Income 321 Home Program 333 CDBG TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 313 CV HOUSING Grant payment reclassification Overhead Reimbursement Overhead Reimbursement Overhead Reimbursement '317 'RDA LOW & MOD INCOME " . . - .. 315 RDA Housing Program 611 RDAlBFfTCI 651 SWfTCll/OV Proj TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 317 RDA LOW & MOD INCOME Merge RDA Housing Program 20% set aside requirement 20% set aside requirement l.:L..:2:8~1 -~---'iO'5":l ",,_ 1.o.()2.~1~ 1~~::;1~9-il.2:645.il $6,74~,474 N .... ~ '341 'PUBL.:IC-L1ABILiTYTRUST' - -.,- ~ - -. 100 General Fund General Fund transfer for public liability expenses U,C ~1~80jl;2Q2J $1,800,000 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 341 PUBLIC LIABILITY TRUST 414 S_EWE~ SERVJCE REVEt-jUE:, 428 Sewer Facility Repiacement TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 414 SEWER SERVICE REVENUE Staff Time Reimbursement - Video Inspection $174,258 441 ~994 PENSION.OBL.:IGATION,BOND ' , ~:a ". ~. _' . 100 General Fund Debt Service Payment - Pension Obiigation Bond TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 441 1994 PENSION OBLIGATION BOND R,:',; 2,509~ $2,509,188 442 CDBG SECTION 108 LOAN ' . ' 333 Community Dev Block Grant Debt Service Payment - Section 108 Loan TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 442 CDBG SECTION 108 LOAN L " 734~471.1 $734,471 446 NOTES PAYABLE ADAMO PROPERTY ' . ,- . - - 567 DIF Adamo Property Debt Service Payment - Parking Lot Acquisition Cost TOTAL TRANSFERS IN -446 NOTES PAYABLE ADAMO PROPERTY $48,113 -v, ,.r.,,_ ..."...., .;]I _.-,~.~ ,y ,_..___.~__~_ ______~ p ....'.1. '....:.,.. ':.SCHED'UI:!EOFINTf:.RFUN'DTRANSFERS' ..' :t '. _ . . ~_ ~ __ _ _ _ __ 448 ':2000 COP SER A-FIN PROJECT <.. '. '" -. _' ~ '" _ 1 - _ '.W~!lIl1;~ ,. J'. .,.,.>; ....:.:; ":.\~.,,..,....... I I 0 f 0 D 100 General Fund 574 Corporation Yard Relocation TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 448 2000 COP SER A-FIN PROJECT 449'SD CO REGIONf.L COMM SYSTEMS' . . Debt Service Payment - Corporation Yard Debt Service Payment - Corporation Yard I ~ ~669:3;r6'1 h.~:'-1 ,098;290 <J $1,767,610 100 General Fund Debt Service Payment - 800Mhz Backbone Cost TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 449 SO CO REGIONAL COMM SYSTEMS $295,734 450' 2002 COP ,=,6L1CE FA.CILlTY PROJ' .., , " .. Y' 100 General Fund 573 Police Department Facility Remodel TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 450 2002 COP POLICE FACILITY PROJ 451 LONG-TERM ADVANCES DSF - CITY - - . Debt Service Payment - Police Facility Debt Service Payment - Police Faciiity r~0:179~1l3'1 tr,,;~J:73.?,,633) $3,915,746 301 Storm Drain Rev 433 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF 515 Twin Oaks Assessment District 96-1 516 Oxford St Assessment District 97-1 591 Transportation DIF TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 451 LONG-TERM ADVANCES DSF - CITY 452 FIRE E.QUIPT CAPL I::EASE . '. . Debt Serv Pymt - Trunk Sewer Capl Res-Reso 18996 Debt Serv Pymt - Trunk Sewer Capl Res-FYOO-01 Budget Reso Debt Serv Pymt - Trunk Sewer Capl Res-Reso 18873 Debt Serv Pymt - Trunk Sewer Capl Res-Reso 18795 Interfund loan from TDIF to PFDIF ":" "' "" . 50;000 ; L.. ,~__,.~ r'-~"-Oiii :,,~:;'. . 250;000 " t,.-, , ",' 3,680:1 ('-::-::;-:-"'3' 8'54'1 ;;;;;:;;';;;~I:...:,,)_. f:;;c: 5,300;0001 $5,607,534 100 General Fund TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 452 FIRE EQUIPT CAPL LEASE 453 CI;C ~OAN REPMT,' '. - -~ "~.- - --- - "'~ Debt Serv Pymt - Fire Equipment 100 General Fund $172,216 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 453 CEC LOAN REPMT Debt Serv Pymt - Fire Equipment f <,':=;:;'194,0601 $194,000 : '" ,,", >' l' '. ,'. SCHEDl.fLE. OF -I.NURFUND TRANSFERS' H,.,: . ' ., ,'" ~...' ~. - I ".... .~ ~_, - _, _ _'--__ ___-"''- _" _,.._~........~ .-._._ ,~ ,..... .,...,..........""..:.".'.,,.. D 47,1 2003-REftJNDINGCERT OF,PAI(JT '" :- 651 Redev Agency SWfTCll/OV Proj TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 471 2003 REFUNDING CERT OF PART Debt Service - 03 Refunding COP RDA 93 COP ! t: i1:05f(M53 $1,054,505 4?2" 2004 COP qV"CTR PROJ pHAS~ 'I ,": -.. , ' 100 General Fund 572 Public Facilities DIF ,Civic Center 717 Residential Construction Tax Debt Service - Civic Center Phase 1 Debt Service, Civic Center Phase 1 Debt Service, Western Chula Vista Infrastructure '\'J3)4,~ItJ '402'i,ocfoll , 79:242-- $2,396,117 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 472 2004 COP CIV CTR PROJ PHASE I 473 20,06 COP CIV CTR PROJ PHASE,2 '" .... f' 100 General Fund 572 Public Facilities DIF ' Civic Center TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 473 2006 COP CIV CTR PROJ PHASE 2 Debt Service, Civic Center Phase 2 Debt Service, Civic Center Phase 2 ~,:28'7;.€.'98'i1 L:,_",,990;S~ $1,278,200 571 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF " _. _ , ,,' 451 L T Adv DSF City TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 571 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF Interfund loan from TDIF to PFDIF P;:;:',s'i,360,ooO'1 $5,300,000 591 T~NSPORTATION DIF" " , 736 Oth Transportation Prog TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 591 TRANSPORTATION DIF Capital expenditure reimbursements Q" 1;402,OOQJ "".~._.....~.;",., $1,402,000 611 BAYFRONTrrC' ' ': -~': .--,; ;", - - - 653 RDA 2008 TARBs proj TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 611 BAYFRONT/TCI Fund street improvement capital project j. - '.;,:~8(jQ-;0OO'1 $800,000 691 LO~G-TERM ADVANCES DSF - RDA - . . .... ~ - , '..",,- ~ . " - - 611 Redev BayfrontfTown Ctr 651 Redev Agency SWfTCII/OV proj TOTAL TRANSFERS IN ,691 LONG-TERM ADVANCES DSF - RDA Interfund loans payment to GF Interfund loans payment to GF f":::'Y; ---m-:-95:5'] L:.J2:309;8~ $2,782,842 : . ".,'. . SCHEDULE Of INIERFUND TRANSFERS . . . .. - ~,- . . '_. ..,;"",. _" fl.... ~'. _l>. _~ ._~ ~ __~__ ._~___~ __.__ __~. ____ ___ ....~~I iW04 "9'0 D 693 05 TN< REV (ERAF) ..... _ . 611 Redev BayfrontfTown Ctr 651 So WestfTwn Ctrll/Otay Valley TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 693 05 TAX REV (ERAF) Debt Service payment Debt Service payment n;;;;--'~-'ii"'l ..,,,'''5.~:88~;' F '49'682]" .....:,.c<;".:_.:... .;._ ."'.. $100,569 - - - 694 06 if AX REV (ERAF) , ' 611 Redev BayfrontfTown Ctr 651 So WestfTwn Ctrll/Otay Valley TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 694 06 TAX REV (ERAF) Debt Service payment Debt Service payment [;';:~:~~,.?BJ r;:-:-46)581 $125,632 695 06 SR TABS SER A . N ". 'f' 611 Redev BayfrontfTown Ctr TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 695 06 SR TABS SER A Debt Service payment c;;:: 1,017;545) -;-".'~~"""""""'~ $1,017,545 69606SRTABSSERB ':, ,'. ; , " 611 Redev BayfrontfTown Ctr TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 696 06 SR TABS SER B Debt Service payment 1,;'{~,,994:~ $994,199 697 08 TABS , " ' . ' _ _ ~ . . . .' ~ ~ H' 651 So WestfTwn Ctrll/Otay Valley 689 00 Tax Alloc Bnds TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 697 08 TABS Debt Service payment Close fund 689 due to refundin9 IT ..,::::ill;~361 I' ; ~ .;",515:000] $963,636 , 717 RESlp CO.NSli., .. ::. - .' . 515 AD2005.1 Tobias TOTAL TRANSFERS IN -717 RESID CONST Project reimbursement r '?61J;oQQJ $60,000 723 BICYClE FACILITIES ~ . ' -' 227 TransNet TOTAL TRANSFERS IN -723 BICYCLE FACILITIES Capital expenditure reimbursements a. ..... ~,A:.1.?~ $1,429 $55,197,467 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS .~"\ FlD ,';~"; ii,' f'" ,\, "t\~~;~ 1(~ II 1/ i<-" ""''r" \ V l' ",-r'0 'I: (.p' ';'h;:!.L,.>" ~:/' crtnr Of """""~',.'I " I" '''~'\ I' 1"~".""'."J""" '" 'tf''' "i'," lii'" ., '. '': "-.~,, ill "'I ~i J '~' ~:\ . ,\ .,~,,: R'\,~ ~'. i. :' r~ /"':~:;::\ ':~.' ':1 J ": ,!".."", ~ d "m ,,j '" '" I, <'" t" , , -246- , - - . " . '''.> ,,;,;' >,."" .''It - :"..:,.",;::' :",lh ""i::,::~~:~, !~, '., . . _' ,'. . .-:;R'."',_.> ~ ':" ,~': . I ~ "~" '.. ,:1 .,..,.,_1 . . ,"'" ">-, IPROIPOSIED IBlJDGIET IF~SCAIL VIEAIR 2009-10 AUIHORLllE[) IPOS~l~ONS /BY [)IEIPARlMIENT -247- ~ ~ ^-; ~ ~ Jr;> c~ 701, ~ ~ 9 > ~) F UTJ ~ C. [F\'i';1JIW:l@j . . ~ ~ '_" '1DJE'IDQl]IT - [F\'i'~ [F\'i';1Jii.!g),OO) ~~ @lh~ ~~[Gl!l.'f' Chief of Staff Coastal/Environmental Policy Consultant Constituent Services Manager Councilperson Executive Secretary Mayor Office Specialist (Mayor/ at will) Senior Council Assistant 100 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 100 1.00 4.00 (100) (100) " ., , , .00 4.00 ..' ; 100 .100 '100 5.00.1 100 CITY COUNCIL TOTAL 14.00 (1.00) 13.00 cnvnERK' ~: - . Administralive Secretary 100 ','1 190 Assistanl City Clerk 100 (1.00) City Clerk 1.00 .100 Deputy City Clerk 1.00 .,foo' Records Manager 1.00 '1.00 Records Specialist 1.00 .O~~L Senior Office Specialist 0.50 , 0.50 Senior Records Specialist 100 100 CITY CLERK TOTAL 7.50 (1.00) 6.50 .CITY ATtORNEY -i _. -. . . Assistant City Attorney 1.00 1.00 City Attorney 1.00 1.00 '. Deputy City Attorney II 100 1.00 {aD'; Deputy City Attorney III 4.00 (2.00) . 2.00' .,. Executive Secretary 1.00 (1.00) Legal Assistant 2.00 2pq, Senior Assistant City Attorney 2.00 (100) 1.00' Senior Legal Assistant 1.00 foo CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL 12.00 (2.00) 10.00 'ADMIN I ST.RATI0 r..,( _' _' _ Administrative Secretary Administrative Technician Assistant City Manager Assistant Director of Budget & Analysis City Manager 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 (1.00) I " 1'00 .100 (100) 00 .249. 1?i7~ I?i7 ~ 1?i7:!1mli.P'OO) 1J\"I :!1mli.P'OO) ~ ~&ffi ~11lD)~Sl-~~D) ~~~~' 1,00 1,.00 (1,00) (100) ~(j\@~ Communications Coordinator Director of Budget and Analysis Director of Communications Director of Conservation & Environmental Services Economic Development Officer Environmental Resource Manager Environmental Resource Specialist Executive Assistant to the City Manager Executive Secretary Fiscal & Management Analyst Government Relations Liaison Graphic Designer Principal Economic Development Specialist Principal Management Analyst Senior Graphic Designer Senior Management Analyst Sen ior Secretary Special Events Planner Special Projects Manager ADMINISTRATION TOTAL 1,00 1,00 1,00 100 100 1,00 1,00 100 4,00 1,00 100 1,00 1,00 100 UO 100 1,00 100 (UO) (100) (400) (100) (1,00) (100) (100) (1.00) (100) (100) (16.00) 26.00 ITS, \ I,.' -: . .-- . i c' 100 ,,-I' . i 1.00 00, 1.00, . " i~ 100" 10.00 Administrative Secretary 1 00 (1.00) ':"" Director of Information Technology Services 1 00 T66 GIS Specialist 3.00 3.66 GIS Supervisor 1.00 i!",'" 1.00 Information Technology Support Manager 1 00 ':'1.00 Information Technology Support Specialist 6.00 1 00 (2.00) 500 Operations & Telecommunications Manager 1.00 "100 Senior Applications Support Specialist 2.00 (1.00) I ,~ )oq . Senior Information Technology Support 2.00 -'. 2.00 . Specialist Senior Programmer Analyst 2.00 :;;" i60 , Telecommunications Specialist 1.00 1.06 ' Webmaster 2.00 (1.00) 1.00 ITS TOTAL 23.00 1.00 (5.00) 19.00 HDMANRES0tJRGES . - -"" - I "_ ~ _ Administrative Secretary Assistant Director of Human Resources 100 1.00 (1.00) .250- 1.00 l~ .. 'd_'- . AuiL~OR'I~~D 'P@SliTi~~..isl BY 'ID6P~Ji;rMEISl\1t . ~__ I r."""~''''''!!r~''''r1Tt"':!.-___!'''''P''''t"",, .....................""'. ~. 1;;.~.......,.. ,,__ Benefits Manager Benefits Technician Director of Human Resources Fiscal Office Specialist Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Operations Manager Human Resources Technician Principal Human Resources Analyst Risk Manager Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Human Resources Analyst Senior Risk Management Specialist HUMAN RESOURCES TOTAL ~(~I!I~ ~ '.~. 100 2.00 100 0.50 300 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 5.00 20.50 FIN>-\NCE ~ ,.... n~ . ." . !i\'f~ 1i'i7~1IW ~~ ~~, (1.00) (0.50) (100) ! 1.00 (2.00) (4.50) >1i'i7~1IW ~ ~ 100 '1.00 .,,, '., 1.00, 3.00 . 100, 100 "I" OO"! . 1.00 ' I " 2QO 300 16.00 Accounting Assistant 9.00 (100) , 8:00'" Accounting Technician 4.00 400 Assistant Director of Finance 1.00 1.00 Associate Accountant 2.00 2.00 Budget & Analysis Manager 1.00 1.00 Business License Representative 1.00 ",,,,,., ,f06 Director of Finance 100 '100 Fiscal & Management Analyst 3.00 3.00 Fiscal Operations Manager 1.00 .,1.00 Procurement Specialist 2.00 (1.00) 1.00 Purchasing Agent 100 (1.00) Senior Accountant 1.00 1.00 Senior Procurement Specialist 100 100 Treasury Manager 1.00 ,!"'r" .00 FINANCE TOTAL 25.00 1.00 26.00 GENSVCS/ANIMA~.CARE FACILITY Animal Adoption Counselor Animal Care Assistant . Animal Care Facility Manager Animal Control Officer Animal Control Officer Supervisor Office Specialist Registered Veterinary Technician Senior Animal Care Assistant Senior Office Specialist .251. 1.75 600 100 400 100 350 2.00 1.00 100 ., 1:75, 6.00 1.00 4.00. ,1.00 3.50 2.00 . 1.00 1.00 I . _ c. ~.- A't,J'~~fi~RI~~E~:-!r~l~~~~~ J~Y [)~~vAR.i~~~'Ii ~~_ _~ _ --J 1JiY~ ~ ~ 1JiY~ "f?I7~oo) ~ ~'~Pt ~~ 1.00 !?if ~00l !Bl@}{Q1;1!!!l ~ 100 ..~~. Veterinary ASSistant GEN SVCS/ANIMAL CARE FACILITY TOTAL 22.25 22.25 'PLANNING & -BtJltplr.\lG S~~VICES . ~ Administrative Technician 100 !"L~ . joo Advanced Planning Manager 1.00 TI""" foo Associate Planner 2.00 2.00 Code Enforcement Manager 100 1.00 Code Enforcement Officer 111I 6.00 2.00 8.00 Deputy City ManagerlDirector of Development 1.00 ., 00 Services Development Automation Specialist 100 1.00 .1' " Economic Development Officer 1.00 '1ob' -' Planning Technician 2.00 ' ?OO Principal Economic Development Specialist 1 00 ' , ~ !. i 100: Principal Planner 2.00 2.00 . Secretary 1.00 (100) Senior Administrative Secretary 100 Senior Code Enforcement Officer 2.00 . 2.00 ;.11;, '100' Senior Office Specialist 100 Senior Planner 1.00 (1.00) , Senior Planning Technician 1.00 li'l' 1..00, Senior Project Coordinator 100 100 Sen ior Secretary 100 .00. PLANNtNG & BUILDtNG SERVtCES TOTAL 20.00 2.00 6.00 28.00 ENGINEERING.' .f - - '.: : I Administrative Analyst 1/11 2.00 (2.00) 'j,i', " Assistant Director of Engineering 1.00 (100) ;1 Assistant Surveyor 111I 1.00 (100) Associate Engineer 900 (900) Building Project Manager 2.00 (2.00) "I' >"-1" ' Director of Engineering I City Engineer 100 (100) .Engineering Technician 1111 . 1.00 (1.00) Land Surveyor 1.00 (1.00) II ; . ~I 'i,l, Landscape Architect 050 (050) Principal Civil Engineer 2.00 (200) Principal Management Analyst 1.00 (100) Real Property Manager 1.00 (100) Secretary 1.00 (100) Senior Administrative Secretary 100 (100) .252- @1}~~ Senior Civil Engineer Senior Engineering Technician Senior Office Specialist Signal Systems Engineer 1111 Survey Technician 1111 ENGINEERING TOTAL POLICE i , Administrative Services Manager Chief of Police Civilian Background Investigator Community Service Officer Crime Laboratory Manager Detention Facility Manager Evidence Control Assistant Facility & Supply Specialist Forensics Specialist Latent Print Examiner Office Specialist Parking Enforcement Officer Peace Officer Police Agent Police Captain Police Communications Systems Manager Police Community Relations Specialist Police Data Specialist Police Dispatcher Police Dispatcher Supervisor Police Lieutenant Police Records Specialist Police Records Transcriptionist Police Sergeant Police Services Officer Police Support Services Manager Police Technology Specialist. Police Training and Development Supervisor Principal Management Analyst Public Information Officer (PD) Public Safety Analyst Range Master Secretary Senior Administrative Secretary [NI~ [NI~ ,~.~ '~ '@l}',\'J.~li1jil;:~ 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 100 34.50 [NI~OO> 1R1l9]}{QmID ~~~a."P (500) (2.00) (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (34.50) [NI~OO> ~); ~-'i ,.!.., I" ' 100 100 7.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 050 2.00 300 1.00 2.00 151.00 5300 3.00 1.00 2.00 300 20.00 600 9.00 550 2.00 25.00 12.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 100 500 0.50 4.00 1.00 -253- 1.00 (4.00) (1.00) (100) (200) (5.00) (2.00) (100) 1.00 (100) (1.50) ..: 1.00 '1:00 : :.00 , 3.00 1.ob, 1.00 .. ,100 050 "2:00 _549.00 .. . 49.00 " .1... L,,~ob '.1:00' I...j_ , ~oo .' 20.ob, "d",l '6,00 9.00. '.5.50 '1.2100 2500 12.00 "'1:09 .100 100 3.50 0.50 4.00' 100 l _ _ _~Auf~(i)R~~~I?';iiOS1';f~D~S:;~,Y i!])~~Ji~~1;M'f:rN~- ~ J r, '-~I [ ~ L~~.ID ~ ~ 2.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 337.50 ='=~>$+j 2.00" -4.00 -I 109 1.00 . 1.00 322.00 1.00 (16.50) Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Office Specialist Senior Police Data Specialist Senior Public Safety Analyst Training Programs Specialist POLICE TOTAL o I - - 'FIRE _" _1. __ __ Administrative Secretary 1.00 1.00 Administrative Services Manager 1.00 .! .00, . . ,. Assistant Fire Chief 1.00 (1.00) Deputy Fire Chief 3.00 3.00 Division Chief 100 "1, 1. 00 Facility & Supply Specialist 1.00 1.00 Fire Battalion Chief 7.00 (1.00) ....6,00 I']. Fire Captain 34.00 3400, 'i'! Fire Chief 1.00 ' '-1.00 " Fire Engineer 3500 ','.. 35.00: ' I , Fire Inspector 1/11 5.00 500 Fire Marshal 100 (1.00) Fire Prevention Engineer 100 Dei Firefighter 42.00 42.00 Office Specialist 1.00 ' I.' 1.00 Public Safety Analyst 1.00 ::' 1.00 . Secretary 100 1.00 Senior Fire Inspector 100 1 DO' Senior Office Specialist 1.00 100 FIRE TOTAL 135.00 1.00 136.00 ,PUBLIC WO~KS i _ . Administrative Analyst 1/11 2.00 2.00 Administrative Secretary 1.00 1.00 Administrative Services Manager 1.00 ' 1'00, Animal Adoption Counselor 1.25 (1,25) Animal Care Assistant 6.50 (6.50) Anima' Control Manager 1.00 (100) Animal Control Officer 400 (4.00) Animal Control Officer Supervisor 100 (1.00) ,'"I Assistant Director of Engineering 1.00 100 Assistant Director of Public Works 1.00 1.00 Assistant Surveyor 1/11 1.00 , ,1.00 OJ: .254- ~~(!ID l?t't.~. [WI~1JO) ~~1XlJ ~~".~~ ~~~~ 10.00 1000 2.00 . 2.00 -' 100 ",l.OO , 1.b6 4.00 .",.1350' "1.00 2.00 .,.1.00 2.00 1.00 :~90 ..' 2.00 2.00 :.200 !. ":.. . 230b 200; ,Joo I' 760 . ,2.00 . .1300 : ;:' ,..::;; ~ . ~~ Associate Engineer Building Project Manager Carpenter Construction & Repair Manager Custodial & Facilities Manager Custodial Supervisor Custodian Director of Public Works Electrician Electrician/Equipment Installer Electronics Technician Electronics Technician Supervisor Engineering Technician 1/11 Environmental Health Specialist Equipment Operator Fiscal Office Specialist Gardener 1/11 HVAC Technician Land Surveyor Lead Custodian Locksmith Maintenance Worker 111I Office Specialist Open Space Inspector Open Space Manager Painter Parks & Open Space Manager Parks Manager Parks Supervisor Plumber Principal Civil Engineer Principal Management Analyst Public Works Inspector 1/11 Public Works Manager Public Works Specialist Public Works Supervisor Pump Maintenance Supervisor Pump Maintenance Technician Real Property Manager Registered Veterinary Technician Secretary Senior Administrative Secretary Senior Animal Care Assistant 100 100 1.00 4.00 14.50 100 3.00 100 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2500 3.00 (100) (1.00) 1.00 (100) (2.00) (1.00) 1.00 7.00 2.00 18.00 3.50 6.00 100 2.00 100 100 5.00 2.00 100 (5.00) (3.50) (1.00) (2.00) (100) 2.00 100 6.00 (1.00) I 2.00 3.00 300 1.00 400 1.00 100 (100) 100 1.00 (100) 1.00 -255- 5.00 .00.. J.OO 500. .,. --.. 2.06 3:66 100 6.00 .,00 .'., 3.00 300 .1.00..' '" ., 4.00 100 . I;', 100 100 , ,_I ,,, ' ~~~,..",..."...... - ::_;:_u. ---....--::::i:>: . ~~ . " .. ....,.....--.... ......... ..._----)-~,_._.__.... ...........#"....... ". .....;;;;..' ~ Senior Civil Engineer Senior Electrician Senior Engineering Technician Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Gardener Senior HVAC Technician Senior Landscape Inspector Senior Maintenance Worker Senior Office Specialist Senior Open Space Inspector Senior Park Ranger Senior Public Works Inspector Senior Public Works Specialist Senior Secretary Senior Tree Trimmer Signal Systems Engineer 1/11 Signing & Striping Supervisor Stormwater Compliance Inspector 1/11 Survey Technician 1/11 Traffic Devices Technician Traffic Devices Technician Supervisor Tree Trimmer Tree Trimmer Supervisor Wastewater Collections Manager 100 1,00 100 ,200 296 i.d 9.00 " :00 1 00 1.00 (3.00) ,11;00 (1 00) 1.00 .100 , foo 2.00 2.00: ., ,100 1 00 1.00 2.00 1.00 'I"'!;' ,'1 ~OO 1 ,00 .-, (1 00) 1 00 1.00 1 00 (1,00) ~OO L'.: ""'1'00' (1 00) 2.00' ,,' ; 1'.00 "il'l:h,I,". :'1',60 (0.25) 194.50 I 2.00 9 00 1 00 1400 2.00 1,00 1,00 2,00 , 'i 1.00 2.00 4,00 1,00 300 100 1.00 , !'" PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL 194.75 I RECREATION. 1 _ " ., Administrative Secretary Aquarist Aquatic Supervisor I Aquatic Supervisor II Aquatic Supervisor III Assistant Director Of Recreation Director of Recreation Fiscal & Management Analyst Nature Center Grounds Maintenance Specialist Nature Center Grounds Maintenance Worker Nature Center Program Manager Principal Recreation Manager Recreation Supervisor I Recreation Supervisor II Recreation Supervisor III 2.00 0.75 1,00 2,00 100 100 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2,00 6,00 6,00 7,00 ,256, ~ . _ _ AtJ~~_O~~'Z~!?~ip(j1S:I[lpJN-S:I~~_ r)EP~IlTM~~m -__. _j ;.......,. ,..c;" 'j,,-.'j "y; 5~~~,~C : .-hc....>.- Registered Veterinary Technician Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Office Specialist Senior Recreation Manager RECREATION TOTAL T-t!iift.~;;,"" 38.50 (1.00) (1.00) (12.50) LIBRARY; I I ___ _ Administrative Secretary Assistant Library Director Delivery Driver Deputy City Manager/Director of Library Director of Library Educational Services Supervisor Family and Youth Coordinator Librarian 1/11 Librarian III Library Administrative Coordinator Library Assistant Library Associate Library Digital Services Manager Library Technician Library Volunteer Coordinator Literacy & Programming Coordinator Principal Librarian Secretary Senior Educational Services Supervisor Senior Librarian Senior Office Specialist LIBRARY TOTAL 26.00 1.00 100 100 (1.00) (0.50) 1.00 (1.00) (300) 40.25 [, . , "., ,,< r'" '" ..., '~?;""7---~ "H~c7~-'-~'., -:~~T'\,~_._-!~,~~;, ::'""1'0;; "'~~ -,~E~;ER~~F~~D'~~~};;-TA_~~, __On ." _9~9.0~, .. 4.00 _lL,,'(?3.~0)~869;5,0~ 100 3.00 100 8.00 4.00 1.00 0.50 15.75 1.00 2.00 050 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 (1.00) 1.00 (100) (1.00) (100) (1.00) (2.00) (10.50) 50.75 DEVElOPMENT SERVICES FUND ~ -- - ~ Administrative Technician Assistant Director of Building & Housing Assistant Director of Planning Assistant Planner Associate Engineer Associate Planner Building Inspector 1/11 Building Inspector III 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 5.00 7.00 1.00 (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (2.00) (100) -257- ..;1;." ,'.,,'""" -,,!.., id'!, ";",'}'.'f'btf (i:1 - '1- -.'~ ~ .,.".;- ~ l.."'>:--:;'-"":-_- .~ -_-" 1;. ~ ... -:;-- ~~ ,--_ ! A,liJifliirO,R:I'ZEI)) P0Srt:n)I"ilSB~ 1~,EP~RJiM~Ni]f I . --- - -- - ~ - -- -<- _ _ _ _ I ~~OO) .~ D ~.....~ Deputy Building Official 1.00 Development Automation Specialist 1.00 (1.00) Development Planning Manager 100 Development Services Counter Manager 100 (1.00) Development Services Technician 1111 4.50 (2.50) Development Services Technician III 300 (1.00) Director of Planning & Building 100 (1.00) Engineering Technician 1/11 1.00 Landscape Architect 1.00 Landscape Planner 1111 3.00 Office Specialist 0.50 (0.50) Plans Examiner 3.00 Principal Planner 3.00 (1.00) Public Works Inspector 1111 500 (500) Secretary 1.00 Senior Administrative Secretary 1.00 (100) Senior Building Inspector 1.00 Senior Civil Engineer 3.00 (2.00) Senior Engineering Technician 100 Senior Landscape Inspector 1.00 (100) Senior Office Specialist 1.00 Senior Planner 5.00 (1.00) Senior Plans Examiner 1.00 (1.00) Senior Public Works Inspector 3.00 (3.00) Sen ior Secretary 2.00 (2.00) Transportation Engineer w/Certificate 1.00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUND TOTAL 70.00 (10.50) (20.50) 39.00 .P.ARKI,,!G ,\-tETER' L .~.. Parking Meter Technician 0.50 0.50 (0.50) (0.50) PARKING METER TOTAL o _ ~~. I POLICE BEPT GRA,NTS FUND CBAG Administrative Analyst II CBAG Analyst CBAG Budget Manager CBAG Deputy Executive Director CBAG Director of SO LECC CBAG Executive Assistant CBAG Executive Director CBAG Graphic Designer/Webmaster 1.00 3.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 (1.00) I. .258- ;' . . _ _ ~!0~tf;l6.R'IZE~ ,po~-~Ti6NS BY_ [)I:P~~Tr~E"Nlr u . - _~: i CBAG Lead Programmer Analyst CBAG Management Assistant CBAG Micro Computer Specialist CBAG Network Administrator IIII CBAG Network Manager CBAG Program Analyst CBAG Program Manager CBAG RCFL Network Engineer Peace Officer Police Community Relations Specialist Police Training and Development Supervisor Public Information Officer (PO) Public Safety Analyst POLICE DEPT GRANTS FUND TOTAL I o D 1.00 1.00 100 2.00 100 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 0.50 21,00 1.50 22,50 'ENVIRONMENtAi!SERVI~ES - . Environmental Services Program Manager Recycling Specialist 111I 100 2.00 3,00 1.00 1,00 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES TOTAL 4,00 _. to_ FLEET MANAGEMENT . 1.00 Equipment Maintenance Manager Equipment Mechanic Fire Apparatus Mechanic Fiscal Office Specialist Fleet Manager Mechanic Assistant Senior Equipment Mechanic 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 (1.00) FLEET MANAGEMENT TOTAL 2.00 1.00 10,00 10.00 . - , -TRANSI]" I' _ . .' , . - Administrative Technician Transit Manager Transit Operations Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 3,00 TRANSIT TOTAL 3.00 'SEWER " . ~ '1 Associate Engineer Engineering Technician 111I 2.00 2.00 -259- Equipment Operator Maintenance Worker 1111 Public Works Specialist Public Works Supervisor Senior Civil Engineer Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Maintenance Worker 3.00 18.00 100 4.00 1.00 100 14.00 SEWER TOTAL 46.00 46.00 ~ -- ~ - ~ - - - - ~RED~"'EtOPME~ID {li:P.lo.tJ~ING .' . : Accountant 1.00 Assistant Director of Redevelopment and 1.00 Housing Director of Redevelopment and Housing 100 (100) (formerly Director of Community Development) Principal Project Coordinator 2.00 (1.00) Project Coordinator 1/11 4.00 (2.00) Redevelopment and Housing Manager 1.00 Senior Administrative Secretary 100 Senior Fiscal Office Specialist 1.00 Senior Project Coordinator 4.00 (1.00) Senior Secretary 1.00 (1.00) REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING TOTAL 17.00 (6.00) 11.00 TOTAL AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 1,109.50 (6.50) (98.00) 1,005.00 *FY 2009.10 Proposed Changes column includes implementation ofthe budget reduction plan. reorganization of Development & Maintenance services and Administration. various reclassifications, and new positions. .260. .."} " \, ~ ',f .."," ~ ."" "" ',.f ..<),11. "",' !.1- .;,' <II-all> if"""Th ,~ ;;;;i;,;;~;~(rC!j",i~;:,~':<;,~:;~,;;~ ,. ~ ~ ,;'~!~.i 1~ '" " .,,"~'.. ~ lr~~.~.~"7...;;~,:.. ,;("\,";;/11:1 ~'fl ,: I, "IJI r;.fr..., rl i ~ nv...~,~.. ""'I- -.;;e:.,- .,1. I ^ I,l': ~ ",-' 'IV.. "'/,; "j ,..... , ",Ii1r..<!lcfk>,;":)s"."1.1nl.l' '''''".,''.il ,) Ik", J..,.~, 1. ,W "lJ.~~'" .j, ~ ..' PROPOSED BUDGET APPEND!X Budget Process Fiscal Policies Investment Policies Debt Administration Gann Appropriations Limit Legal Debt Margin List of Acronyms Glossary Chula Vista at a Glance -261- Un the development of the fiscal year 2009-10 I budget the City incorporated additional budget workshops with Council, community groups and employees in order to improve communication and transparency. The budget process began in November 2008 with the identification of a $4.0 million deficit in the 2008-09 fiscal year that was projected to grow to an approximately $20.0 million deficit for fiscal year 2009-10. In order to mitigate the estimated deficits, City departments began a comprehensive process to develop a budget reduction plan. This process began with briefings of city employees, labor groups, the media and City Council. Following the BUDGET PROCESS BUDGET CALENDAR October & November: Revenue and expenditure projections prepared by Finance arid depat1ments, resulting in the preliminary baseline budget November: Analysis of baseline bUdget to determine budgetary gap, development of budget balancing plan December & January: Council review of budget balancing strategy ,April &, May: Develop"!"!nt of City Manager's proposed budget and' implementation of Budget Reduction Plan , th. ' May 26 - Budget submitted to City Council June 9th - Public budget hearings and recommended adoption of final budget ' initial briefings was the establishment of an employee focus group to generate cost saving ideas, as well as several community workshops. The Budget Reduction Plan was presented to the City Council at several Council meetings in December 2008. The City Council approved the Budget Reduction Plan on January 13, 2009. On May 26th, the City Manager transmitted the proposed budget to the City Council for review. A budget workshop will be held for the benefit of the public and City Council on June 16th at which time the City Council will consider the adoption of the budget. Copies of the proposed budget will be made available for public review in the Office of the City Clerk and City libraries approximately 2 weeks prior to the June 9th public hearing. -263- As set forth in the City Charter, at any meeting after the adoption of the budget, the City Council may amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by affirmative votes of at least four members. Throughout the year, the Finance Department provides Council with quarterly fiscal status reports comparing expenditure and revenue projections to budgeted amounts, highlighting any variances and recommending corrective actions as necessary. General Fund Budget Development Milestones . November 17, 2008 At the first Council Budget Workshop, an overview of the fiscal year 2009-10 budget was presented to City Council in conjunction with an updated 5-year forecast and budget balancing options. . December 4, 2008 At the second Council Budget Workshop, the proposed Budget Reduction Plan was presented The primary purpose of the workShOp was to review the proposal and receive Council feedback. These discussions were continued to the council meetings of December 9 and December 16, 2008, and January 6, 2009. . January 13, 2009 The City Council approved the Budget Reduction Plan at which time the implementation of a majority of the plan moved forward. . May 12,2009 An overview of the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed operating and capital improvement budgets were presented to the City Council. . May 26, 2009 As required by City Charter, the City Manager's proposed budget was submitted to the City Council at least thirty-five days before the beginning of the fiscal year. Copies of the proposed budget will be made available for public review in the Office of the City Clerk and City libraries at least ten days before the public hearings, as required by City Charter. -264- o June 9, 2009 A public hearing will be held before Council considers the adoption of the budget in order to give residents an additional opportunity to participate in the budget process. In compliance with the City Charter, a notice of these meetings will be published in the local newspaper at least ten days prior to the public hearings Adoption of the budget requires the affirmative votes of at least three members of the Council. -265- -266- FISCAL POLICIES This section of the budget document reiterates the fiscal policies that were reviewed and acknowledged by the City Council in January 2000. These policies form the overall framework within which the operating budget was formulated. The fiscal policies. most of which are already codified ill one form or another, are not considered new or controversial, but are summarized here to assist you to better understand the basis for the resource allocation decisions that were made. A. General 1. The City's financial assets will be managed in a sound and prudent manner in order to ensure the continued viability of the organization. 2. A comprehensive operating and capital budget for all City funds will be developed annually and presented to the City Council for approval. The purpose of the annual budget will be to: a. Identify community needs for essential services. b. Identify the programs and specific activities required to provide these essential services. c. Establish program poliCies and goals that define the nature and level of program services required. d Identify alternatives for improving the delivery of program services. e. Identify the resources required to fund identified programs and activities, and enable accomplishment of program objectives. f. Set standards to facilitate the measurement and evaluation of program performance .267. 3. The City's annual operating budget will be balanced whereby planned expenditures do not exceed anticipated revenues. 4. Recurring revenues will fund recurring expenditures. One-time revenues will be used for capital, reserve augmentation, or other non-recurring expenditures. 5 Accounting systems will be maintained in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. 6. Investment policy and practice will be in accordance with State statutes that emphasize safety and liquidity over yield, including quarterly status reports to the City Council. (Council Policy) 7. City operations will be managed and budgets prepared with the goal of maintaining an available fund balance in the General Fund of no less than eight percent of the General Fund operating budget. (Council Policy) 8. General Fund fiscal status reports reflecting comparisons of actual and projected performance with budget allocations for both revenues and expenditures will be presented to the City Council on a quarterly basis (City Charter) B. Revenue 1. The City will endeavor to maintain a diversified and stable revenue base in order to minimize the impact to programs from short-term economic fluctuations. 2. Revenue projections will be maintained for the current year and four future fiscal years, and estimates will be based on a conservative, analytical, and objective process. 3. In order to maintain maximum flexibility, except as required by law or the funding source, the City will avoid earmarking any unrestricted revenues for a specific purpose or program. 4. User fees will be imposed when appropriate and set at a level to recover the full cost of services provided which are of a special b'enefit to easily identified individuals or groups. 5. User fees will be reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis to ensure that program costs continue to be recovered and that the fees reflect changes in levels of service delivery. -268- 6. The City will recover the cost of new facilities and infrastructure necessitated by new development consistent with State law and the City's Growth Management Program. Development Impact Fees will be closely monitored and updated to insure that they are maintained at a level adequate to recover costs (GMOC Ordinance) 7. When considering new development alternatives, the City will attempt to determine the fiscal impact of proposed projects, annexations, etc. and insure that mechanisms are put in place to provide funding for any projected negative impacts on City operations. (GMOC Ordinance) c. Expenditures 1 Budgetary control will be exercised at the Department/category level, meaning that each department is authorized to spend up to the total amount appropriated for that department within the expenditure categories of Personnel Costs, Supplies & Services, Other Charges, Utilities, and Capital. Transfers of appropriations between expenditure categories of up to $15,000 may be approved by the City Manager. Transfers of appropriations between expenditure categories in excess of $15,000, or between departments require City Council approval. (City Charter & Council Policy) 2. Appropriations, other than for capital projects, remaining unspent at the end of any fiscal year will be cancelled and returned to Available Fund Balance with the exception of any appropriations encumbered as the result of a valid purchase order or as approved for a specific project or purpose by the City Councilor the City Manager. Appropriations for capital projects will necessarily be carried over from year to year until the project is deemed to be complete. (Council Policy) 3. The City will establish and maintain equipment replacement and facility maintenance funds as deemed necessary to ensure that monies are set aside and available to fund ongoing replacement needs. 4. The City will attempt to compensate non-safety employees at rates above the middle of the labor market as measured by the median rate for similar jurisdictions. (Council Policy) -269- D. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Major capital projects will be included in a CIP Budget reflecting a five-year period. The CIP budget will be updated annually and presented to City Council for approval. Resources will be formally appropriated (budgeted) for the various projects on an annual basis in accordance with the five-year plan. E. Capital Financing & Debt Management 1. The City will consider the use of debt financing only for one-time capital improvement projects when the project's useful life will exceed the term of the financing and when resources are identified sufficient to fund the debt service requirements. The only exception to this limitation is the issuance of short-term instruments such as tax and revenue anticipation notes, which will only be considered in order to meet legitimate cash flow needs occurring within a fiscal year. 2. The City will attempt to limit the total amount of annual debt service payments guaranteed by the General Fund to no more than ten percent of estimated General Fund revenues. 3. The City will consider requests from developers for the use of debt financing secured by property based assessments or special taxes in order to provide for necessary infrastructure for new development only under strict guidelines adopted by Council, which may include minimum value-to-lien ratios and maximum tax burdens. (Community Facility District Ordinance) 4. The City will strive to minimize borrowing costs by: a. Seeking the highest credit rating possible. b. Procuring credit enhancement such as letters of credit or insurance, when cost effective. c. Maintaining good communications with credit rating agencies regarding the City's fiscal condition. .5. The City will diligently monitor its compliance with bond legal covenants, including adherence to continuing disclosure requirements and federal arbitrage regulations. 6. In addition to externally financed debt, the City utilizes inter-fund loans whenever possible to reduce borrowing costs or provide for shorter term loans. When interest is charged on internal loans, it is done at the same rate the City earns from its investments. -270- INVESTMENT POLICIES 1.0 Purpose: This "Investment Policy and Guidelines" (the "Investment Policy") Policy is intended to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of the City of Chula Vista's (the "City") cash balances, and outline policies to assist in maximizing the efficiency of the City's cash management system, while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City. 2.0 Policy: The investment practices and policies of the City of Chula Vista are based upon state law and prudent money management. The primary goals of these practices are: A. To ensure compliance with all Federal, State, and local laws governing the investment of public funds under the control of the Director of FinancelTreasurer. B. To protect the principal monies entrusted to the City's Finance Department. C. Achieve a reasonable rate of return within the parameters of prudent risk management while minimizing the potential for capital losses arising from market changes or issuer default. 3.0 Scope: This. Investment Policy applie? to all financial assets ot the City of Chula Vista, as indicated in 3.1 below. These funds are accounted for in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. -271- 3.1 Funds: The Director of Finance/Treasurer is responsible for investing the unexpended cash in the City Treasury for all funds, except for the employee's retirement funds, which are administered separately, and those funds which are managed separately by trustees appointed under indenture agreements. The Director of Finance/Treasurer will strive to maintain the level of investment of this cash as close as possible to 100%. These funds are described in the City's annual financial report and include: . General Fund . Special Revenue Funds . Capital Project Funds . Enterprise Funds . Trust and Agency Funds . Any new fund created by the legislative body, unless specifically exempted This Investment Policy applies to all transactions involving the financial assets and related activity of the foregoing funds. 4.0 Prudence: The standard of prudence to be used by the Director of Finance/Treasurer shall be the "prudent investor standard". This shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio The "prudent investor standard" is applied to local agencies, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53600.3 which provides, in pertinent part: all governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing public funds pursuant to this chapter are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard. When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the agency, that a prudent person . . acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency. ..." -272- 4.1 Personal Responsibility: The Director of Finance/Treasurer, Assistant Director of Finance and Treasury Manager as investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the Investment Policy and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported to the City Council in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. 5.0 Objective: Consistent with this aim, investments are made under the terms and conditions of California Government Code Section 53600, et seq. Criteria for selecting investments and the absolute order of priority are: 5.1 Safety: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City of Chula Vista shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. To attain this objective, diversification is required in order that potential losses on individual securities do not exceed the income generated from the remainder of the portfolio. 5.2 Liquidity: The City of Chula Vista's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated and to maintain compliance with any indenture agreement, as applicable Liquidity is essential to the safety of principal. 5.3 Return on Investments: The City of Chula Vista's investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market-average rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles (market interest rates), within the City's Investment Policy's risk parameters and the City's cash flow needs. See also Section 16.1. 6.0 Delegation of Authority: The Director of FinancelTreasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials. The responsibility for the day-to-day investment of City funds will be delegated to the Treasury Manager under the general direction of the Assistant Director of Finance. -273- 7.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest: In addition to state and local statutes relating to conflicts of interest, all persons involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could confiict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officers are required to file annual disclosure statements as required for "public officials who manage public investments" [as defined and required by the Political Reform Act and related regulations, including Government Code Sections 81000, et seq., and the rules, regulations and guidelines promulgated by California's Fair Political Practices Commission (FFPC)]. 8.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions: The City's Director of FinancelTreasurer will maintain a list of the financial institutions and brokers/dealers authorized to provide investment and depository services and will perform an annual review of the financial condition and registrations of qualified bidders and require annual audited financial statements to be on file for each company. The City will utilize Moody's Securities or other such services to determine financially sound institutions with which to do business The City shall annually send a copy of the current Investment Policy to all financial institutions and brokers/dealers approved to do business with the City. As far as possible, all money belonging to, or in the custody of, a local agency, including money paid to the City's Director of FinancelTreasurer or other official to pay the principal, interest, or penalties of bonds, shall be deposited for safekeeping in state or national banks, savings associations, federal associations, credit unions, or federally insured industrial loan companies in this state selected by the City's Director of Finance/Treasurer; or may be invested in the investments set forth in Section 9.0. To be eligible to receive local agency money, a bank, savings association, federal association, or federally insured industrial loan company shall have received an overall rating of not less than "satisfactory" in its most recent evaluation by the appropriate federal financial supervisory agency of its record of meeting the credit needs of California's communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. To provide for the optimum yield in the investment of City funds, the City's investment procedures shall encourage competitive bidding on transactions from approved brokers/dealers. In order to be approved by the City, the dealer must meet the following criteria: (i) the dealer must be a "primary" dealer or regional dealer that qualifies under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15C3-1 (Uniform Net Capital Rule); (ii)the dealer's institution must have an office in California, (iii)the dealer -274- must be experienced in institutional trading practices and familiar with the California Government Code as related to investments appropriate for the City; and (iv) all other applicable criteria, as may be established in the investment procedures. All brokers/dealers and financial institutions who desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must submit a "BrokerlDealer Application" and related documents relative to eligibility including a current audited annual financial statement, U4 form for the broker, proof of state registration, proof of National Association of Securities Dealers certification and a certification of having read and understood the City's Investment Policy and agreeing to comply with the Investment Policy. The City's Director of Finance/Treasurer shall determine if they are adequately capitalized (i.e. minimum capital requirements of $10,000,000 and five years of operation). 9.0 Authorized & Suitable Investments: The Chy is authorized by California Government Code Section 53600, et. seq., to invest in specific types of securities. Investments not specifically listed below are deemed inappropriate and prohibited: A. BANKERS' ACCEPTANCES, maximum 25% of portfolio (up to 40% with Council approval). Maximum term 180 days. Banks must have a short term rating of at least AI/PI and a long-term rating of A or higher as provided by Moody's Investors Service or Standard and Poor's Corp. No more than 30% of the agency's money may be invested in the bankers' acceptances of any one commercial bank pursuant to this section. B. NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT, maximum 30% of portfolio. Maximum term 3 years, (Up to 5 years with Council approval). Banks must have a short term rating of AI/PI and a long term rating of at least a single A from a nationally recognized authority on ratings. C. COMMERCIAL PAPER, maximum 25% of portfolio. Maximum term 270 days. Commercial paper of prime quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and number rating as provided for by Moody's Investor Services, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Financial Services. The issuing corporation must be organized and operating within the United States, with total assets in excess of $500 million and shall issue debt, other than commercial paper, that is rated "A" or higher bY Moody's, S&P and FitCh. Split ratings (i.e. A2/PI) are not allowable. No' more than 10% of the outstanding commercial paper of any single corporate issue may be purchased. D. BONDS ISSUED BY THE CITY OR ANY LOCAL AGENCY WITHIN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. -275- Bonds must have an "A" rating or better from a nationally recognized authority on ratings E. OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES TREASURY United States Treasury Notes, bonds, bills or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. There is no limit on the pE;rcentage of the portfolio that can be invested in this category. F. FEDERAL AGENCIES Debt instruments issued by agencies of the Federal government. Though not general obligations of the U.S. Treasury, such securities are sponsored by the government or related to the government and, therefore, have high safety ratings. The following are authorized Federal Intermediate Credit Bank (FICB). Federal Land Bank (FLB), Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), Tennessee Valley Authorities (TVA). Student Loan Association Notes (SLMA) and Small Business Administration (SBA). There is no limit on the percentage of the portfolio that can be invested in this category. G. REPURCHASE AGREEMENT, maximum term 3 months. Investments in repurchase agreements may be made, on any investment authorized in this section, when the term of the agreement does not exceed 3 months. A Master Repurchase Agreement must be signed with the bank or broker/dealer who is selling the securities to the City. H. REVERSE-REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS (Requires Council approval for each transaction) Reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending agreements may be utilized only when all of the following conditions are met: a) The security to be sold on reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement has been owned and fully paid for by the local agency for a minimum of 3D days prior to sale. b) The total of all reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements on investments owned by the local agency does not exceed 20% of the base value of the portfolio. c) The agreement does not exceed a term of 92 days, unless the agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the same security. -276- d) Funds obtained or funds within the pool of an equivalent amount to that obtained from selling a security to a counter party by way of a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, shall not be used to purchase another security with a maturity longer than 92 days from the initial settlement date of the reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, unless the reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the same security. Investments in reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements, or similar investments in which the local agency sells securities prior to purchase with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the security shall only be made with primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or with a nationally or state-chartered bank that has or has had a significant banking relationship with a local agency. e) For purposes of this chapter, "significant banking relationship" means any of the following activities of a bank: i. Involvement in the creation, sale, purchase, or retirement of a local agency's bonds, warrants, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness. ii. Financing of a local agency's activities. iii. Acceptance of a local agency's securities or funds as deposits. I. MEDIUM-TERM CORPORATE NOTES, maximum 20% of portfolio (30% with Council approval), with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less. Notes eligible for investment shall be "A" rated or its equivalent or better as determined by a nationally recognized rating service. J. TIME DEPOSITS-CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (non-negotiable certificates of deposit.) Maximum of 3 years Deposits must be made with banks or savings & loan that have a short term rating of AI/PI or a long term rating of at least a single A from a generally recognized authority on.ratings. K. OBLIGATIONS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Obligations must be "A" rated or better from a nationally recognized authority on ratings. -277- L. MONEY MARKET FUNDS, maximum 15% of portfolio. (Requires Council approval for each transaction) No more than 10% of the agency's surplus funds may be invested in shares of beneficial interest of anyone Money Market fund, Local agencies may invest in "shares of beneficial interest" issued by diversified management companies which invest only in direct obligations in U.S. Treasury bills, notes and bonds, and repurchase agreements with a weighted average of 60 days or less. They must have the highest rating from two national rating agencies, must maintain a daily principal per share value of $1.00 per share and distribute interest monthly, and must have a minimum of $500 million in assets under management. The purchase price of the shares may not include commission. M. THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) LAIF is a special fund of the California State Treasury through which any local government may pool investments. The City may invest up to $40 million in this fund. Currently, the City has established two (2) agency funds through which the Director of FinancelTreasurer may invest the unexpended cash for all funds: The City of Chula Vista City Fund, and the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency Fund. Investments in LAIF are highly liquid and may be converted to cash within 24 hours. N. INVESTMENT TRUST OF CALIFORNIA (CAL TRUST) The City may invest in shares of beneficial interest issued by the Investment Trust of California (CaITRUST), a local government investment pool established by local entities as a joint powers authority pursuant to California Government Code Sections 6509.7 and 53601 (p), provided: . CalTRUST investments are limited to the securities and obligations authorized for local agency investment pursuant to Subdivisions (a) to (n), inclusive, of California Government Code Section 53601; and . CalTRUST shall have retained an investment adviser that: . Is registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission; . Has not less than five years experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized for local agency investment pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (n), inclusive, of California Government Code Section 53601; and . Has assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). 9.1 Investment Pools: The City's Director of FinancelTreasurer or designee shall be required to investigate all local -278- government investment pools and money market mutual funds prior to investing and performing at least a quarterly review thereafter while the City is invested in the pool or the money market fund. LAIF is authorized under provisions in Section 16429.1 of the California Government Code as an allowable investment for local agencies even though some of the individual investments of the pool are not allowed as a direct investment by a local agency. 10.0 Portfolio Adjustments: Should any investment listed in section 9.0 exceed a percentage-of-portfolio limitation due to an incident such as fluctuation in portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to maturity to avoid losses. When no loss is indicated, the Director of Finance/Treasurer shall consider reconstructing the portfolio basing his or her decision on the expected length of time the portfolio will be unbalanced. If this occurs, the City Council shall be notified. 11.0 Collateralization: Under provisions of the California Government Code, California banks, and savings and loan associations are required to secure the City's deposits by pledging government securities with a value of 110 % of principal and accrued interest. California law also allows financial institutions to secure City deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the City's total deposits. Collateral will always be held by an independent third party. A clearly marked evidence of ownership (safekeeping receipt) must be supplied to the City and retained. The market value of securities that underlay a repurchase agreement shall be valued at 102% or greater of the funds borrowed against those securities and the value shall be adjusted no less than quarterly. Since the market value of the underlying securities is subject to daily market fluctuations, the investments in repurchase agreements shall be in compliance if the value of the underlying securities is brought back up to 102% no later than the next business day. The Director of Finance/Treasurer, at his or her discretion, may waive the collateral requirement for deposits that are fully insured up to $100,000 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The right of collateral substitution is granted. 12.0 Safekeeping and Custody: All City investments shall identify the City of Chula Vista as the registered owner, and all interest and principal payments and withdrawals shall indicate the City of Chula Vista as the payee. All securities shall be safe kept with the City itself or with a qualified financial institution, contracted by the City as a third party. All agreements and statements will be subject to review annually by external auditors in conjunction with their audit. In the event that the City has a financial institution -279- hold the securities, a separate custodial agreement shall be required. All securities shall be acquired by the safekeeping institution on a "Delivery-Vs-Payment" (DVP) basis. For Repurchase Agreements, the purchase may be delivered by book entry, physical delivery or by third-party custodial agreement consistent with the Government Code. The transfer of securities to the counter party bank's customer book entry account may be used for book entry delivery. 13.0 Diversification: The City's investment portfolio will be diversified to avoid Incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks associated with concentrating investments in specific security types, maturity segment, or in individual financial institutions. With the exception of U.S. Treasury securities and authorized pools, no more than 60% of the total investment portfolio will be invested in a single security type or with a single financial institution. In addition, no more than 10% of the investment portfolio shall be in securities of anyone issuer except for U.S. Treasuries and U.S. Government Agency issues. A. Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the insurer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing in those securities with an "A" or above rating and approved in the Investment Policy and by diversifying the investment portfolio so that the failure of anyone issuer would not unduly harm the City's cash flow. B. Market risk, defined as the risk of market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by structuring the portfolio so that securities mature at the same time that major cash outflows occur, thus eliminating the need to sell securities prior to their maturity. It is explicitly recognized herein, however, that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured losses are inevitable and must be considered within the context of overall investment return. The City's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated. 14.0 Maximum Maturities: To the extent possible, the City will attempt to match its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements. Unless matched to a specific cash flow, the City will not directly invest in securities maturing more than Jive (5) years from the date of purchase, unless, the legislative bOdy has granted express authority to make that investment either specifically, or as a part of an investment program approved by the City Council. -280- 15.0 Internal Control: The Director of FinancelTreasurer shall establish a system of internal controls designed to prevent Joss of public funds due to fraud, employee error, misrepresentation by third parties, or unanticipated market changes. No investment personnel may engage in an investment transaction except as provided for under the terms of this Investment Policy and the procedure established by the Director of FinancelTreasurer. The external auditors shall annually review the investments with respect to the Investment Policy. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with policies and procedures for the investments that are selected for testing. Additionally, account reconciliation and verification of general ledger balances relating to the purchasing or maturing of investments and allocation of investments to fund balances shall be performed by the Finance Department and approved by the Director of Finance/Treasurer. To provide further protection of City funds, written procedures prohibit the wiring of any City funds without the authorization of at least two of the following four designated City staff: 1. Director of Finance/Treasurer 2. Assistant Director of Finance 3. Treasury Manager 4. Fiscal Operations Manager 16.0 Performance Standards: This Investment Policy shall be reviewed at least annually by the Director of FinancelTreasurer to ensure its consistency with the overall objective of preservation of principal, liquidity, and return, and its relevance to current law and financial and economic trends. All financial assets of all other funds shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this Investment Policy. The monies entrusted to the Director of FinancelTreasurer will be held in a passively managed ("hold to maturity") portfolio. However, the Director of FinancelTreasurer will use best efforts to observe, review, and react to changing conditions that affect the portfolio, and to do so in a manner that is consistent with this Investment Policy. 16.1 Market Yield (Benchmark): The investment portfolio shall be managed to attain a market-average rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the City's investment risk constraints and cash flow. Investment return becomes a consideration only after the basic requirements of investment -281- safety and liquidity have been met. Because the investment portfolio is designed to operate on a 'hold-to-maturity' premise (or passive investment style) and because of the safety, liquidity, and yield priorities, the performance benchmark that will be used to determine whether market yields are being achieved shall be the average of the monthly LAIF rate and the 12-month rolling average 2 - Year Constant Maturity Treasury (CMT) rate. While the City will not make investments for the purpose of trading or speculation as the dominant criterion, the Director of Finance/Treasurer shall seek to enhance total portfolio return by means of ongoing portfolio and cash management. The prohibition of highly speculative investments precludes pursuit of gain or profit through unusual risk and precludes investments primarily directed at gains or profits from conjectural fluctuations in market prices. The Director of FinancelTreasurer will not directly pursue any investments that are leveraged or deemed derivative in nature. However, as long as the original investments can be justified by their ordinary earning power, trading in response to changes in market value can be used as part of on-going portfolio management. 17.0 Reporting: The Director of FinancelTreasurer shall submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council and City Manager following the end of each quarter. This report will include the following elements: . Type of investment . Institutional Issuer . Purchase Date . Date of maturity . Amount of deposit or cost of the investment . Face value of the investrnent . Current market value of securities and source of valuation . Rate of interest . Interest earnings . Statement relating the report to its compliance with the Statement of Investment Policy or the manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance . Statement on availability of funds to meet the next six month's obligations . Monthly and Year-to-date Budget Amounts for Interest Income . Percentage of Portfolio by Investment Type . Days to Maturity for all Investments . Comparative report on Monthly Investment Balances & Interest Yields . Monthly transactions -282- This quarterly investment report shall be an information item for the City Council and City Manager. In addition, a commentary on capital markets and economic conditions may be included with the report. 18.0 Investment Policy Adoption: By virtue of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, the Council shall acknowledge the receipt and filing of this annual statement of Investment Policy for the respective fiscal year. -283- "~ 'If~ J;fh'" " \.' (( ,. ~>;';'%" ~ f ". Jl"<'\'!'L~L", 'ii; ~", nrv flf..' m >:.,. -", ,":._"." ~"""'H" "J' Iii J ~,~" t\' '@./r~,.~.;[' A' ,( ',. t; t~ . r:; _: '''1 ri,: ":\ <::: _:~ ':.'. '"j,..,~ -f";' ; " ltlb;;/- \; F '<>:,,,,!i t."",;" 1n ,;> ~!" t;;u>"i lil Ji \} .284. DEBT ADMINISTRATION Based on the audited financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2008, the City and the Redevelopment Agency (Agency) had borrowed funds through several long-term debt issues and had other obligations to be funded over a period of time longer than one year, which can be categorized as follows: Description Tax Allocation Bonds Pension Obligation Bonds Certificates of Participation Bond Premium Bond Discount Capital Leases Notes/Loans Payable CDBG Section 108 Loan Miscellaneous Claims Payable Compensated Absences (Employee Leave) Subtotal Advances from other Funds Total Long Term Debt Amount Outstanding $40,185,000 8,820,000 135,045,000 30,712 (457,704) 2,211,933 1,589,326 9,500,000 15,667,881 6,430,075 $219,022,223 49,414.199 $268 436 422 The Long-Term Debt total reflects a decrease of $0.4 million when compared to the June 2007 amount. The decrease is due to combination of a net increase in long-term debt of $4.0 million offset by a decrease in Advances from other Funds of $4.4 million. The additions to the City's long- term debt include a $9.5 million loan from the U S. Department of Housing and Urban Development secured by the City's Community Development Block Grant. In addition, the City entered into a 5- -285- year lease purchase agreement ($0.8 million) for medical resuscitation equipment for use by the fire Department. Tax Allocation Bonds ($40.2 million) Tax Allocation Bonds (TABS) are issued by the Agency and utilize tax increment revenue for debt service. The 2006 Senior TABS, Series A and 2006 Subordinate TABS, Series B were issued to refund the 1994 TABS Series A, C and D that were issued to refund prior obligations of the Bayfront and Town Center 1 project areas. The 2000 TABS were issued by the Southwest, Otay Valley and Town Center 2 project areas to finance certain redevelopment activities in those areas. Pension Obliqation Bonds ($8.8 million) The Pension Obligation Bonds represent money borrowed in 1994 to allow the City to pay down the liability to the Public Employees' Retirement System that had accumulated over many years, and for which the City was being charged a higher interest rate than was obtained by this borrowing. Certificates of Participation ($135.0 million) As of June 30, 2008, the City currently has five outstanding Certificates of Participation. The Chula Vista Public Financing Authority (Authority) issued the 2000 COP to finance improvements to the City's 800-megahertz emergency communications system and the City's Corporation yard. The 2002 COP was issued to finance the cost of constructing the City's Police Facility. In May 2003, the Authority issued the 2003 Refunding COP to defease the 1993 Refunding COP and the 1993 COP and reimburse the City for amounts it has advanced to prepay an equipment lease. The 2004 COP was issued to finance the Phase 1 reconstruction, renovation and equipping of the City's Civic Center Complex. In March 2006, the Authority issued the 2006 COP to finance the Phase 2 construction and equipping of certain improvements to the Civic Center Complex of the City and other existing City Facilities. Bond Premium ($30,712) This is .the premium on the issuance of the 2004 COP Civic Center Phase 1. Original amount was $35,324. This amount is amortized over 30 years. -286- Bond Discount (-$457,704) This is the discount on the issuance of the 2006 Refunding TABS. Original amount was $505,884. This amount is amortized over 20 years. Capital Leases ($2.2 million) The Capital Leases represent three long-term lease-purchase obligations for the San Diego County Regionalized Communications System and for replacement of the library's computerized catalog and circulation system and the 5-year lease purchase agreement for medical resuscitation equipment for use by the fire Department. Notes/Loans Payable ($1.6 million) The Agency participated in a Loan Agreement with the California Statewide Communities Development Authority to finance the 2005 and 2006 share of the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) payments to the County Auditor ($765,000 and $930,000 respectively). In January 1994, the City entered into a note payable with a private party in order to purchase certain land for the ultimate purpose of constructing a three-level parking structure. Miscellaneous Loans Payable ($15.7 million) The Miscellaneous Claims Payable represents the probable amount of loss as estimated by legal counsel and risk management staff due to worker's compensation and general liability claims filed against the City. Compensated Absences ($6.4 million) The obligation for Compensated Absences represents the current dollar value of accumulated leave balances, primarily vacation leave, for employees that would have to be paid off if all employees terminated for whatever reason as of June 30, 2008. Advances From Other Funds ($49.4 million) Advances from Other Funds include obligations related to' the Agency. The balance includes $4.5 million of funds loaned from the BayfrontlTown Center 1 Project Area to various Capital Project Funds. In addition, the Agency has entered into various loans and obligations covered under reimbursement agreements with the City totaling $26.3 million for certain lease payments and $4.5 -287- million for operating purposes. These obligations have been incurred to support various redevelopment activities throughout the City. The Trunk Sewer Fund has advanced to the Salt Creek DIF $13.3 million for major sewer projects needed to support continued growth. The Corporation Yard Relocation fund advanced $0.9 million to the General Fund for the Animal Shelter expansion. General Fund Lonq-Term Debt for Fiscal Year 2009-10 The General Fund's annual debt service "commitment" in fiscal year 2009-10 is approximately $122 million, or approximately 9.2% of the General Fund operating budget. However, it must be noted that although this amount is truly a General Fund commitment, only $6.3 million will actually be paid from General Fund resources, with the remaining $5 9 million paid from development impact fees, residential construction tax and various other funding sources. The $6.3 million represents approximately 4.4% of the General Fund operating budget, which would be considered more of an average debt burden for a local governmental entity. Annual Debt Service Obligation of the General Fund Fiscal Years 2003-04 through 2010-11 <Jl $14 '" 0 ~ $12 $10 ------ $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 D Civic Center Parking - Notes payable el800 Mhz - County Buy-in a Shopping Mall COP/2003 Ref COP 1!I Pension Obligation Bonds a Financial Systems/2003 Ref COP iii Palomar Trolley Commercial [J Safety CAD/MDT System/2003 Ref COP . Library System - Capital Lease 13800 Mhz Radio System/2003 Ref COP II Corporation Yard - 2000 COP 111800 Mhz Equipment - 2000 COP IilPolice Facility - 2002 COP IIIWestern CV Park/Drainage 2004 COP aCivic Center Expansion 2004 COP a Civic Center Expansion 2006 COP -288- GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, approved by the voters in 1979, imposed the concept of spending limits on local governments. This Constitutional provision and related implementing legislation specifies that annual increases in appropriations financed from "Proceeds of Taxes" are limited to a base year (1978-79) amount increased annually by an inflation factor comprised of the change in population of the City combined with the greater of the change in new non-residential construction or the change in the California per capita personal income. By definition, "Proceeds of Taxes" includes such revenues as property taxes, sales and use taxes, utility users taxes, transient occupancy taxes, and state subventions. Revenues from other sources like fees/charges and federal grants are considered "Non-Proceeds of Taxes" and are not subject to the annual spending limit. This calculation has always been perfunctory for the City of Chula Vista, since the proceeds of taxes for the City are far less than the statutory appropriation limit. The State Department of Finance and the San Diego County Assessor's Office are charged with providing the data necessary for local jurisdictions to establish their appropriation limit. According to these sources, for purposes of the fiscal year 2008-09 calculation, the population increased 1.51% and California per capita personal income increased by 4.29%. New non-residential construction increased 16.86% and was used in the formula to compute the limit since this increase was higher than the increase in California per capita personal income. -289- The fiscal year 2008-09 Appropriation Limit has been calculated as follows. Fiscal Year 2007-08 Appropriation Limit $511,957,324 Increased by an inflation factor composed of the increases in population and per capita income change X 11862 Fiscal Year 2008-09 Appropriations Limit $607.303.566 The "Proceeds of Taxes" as included in the fiscal year 2008-09 Proposed Budget that are subject to the appropriations limit are estimated to be $92,391,854. Therefore the City has what is referred to as an appropriation "gap" of $514,911,712 ($607,303,566 - $92,391,854) Simply stated, this means that the City could collect and spend up to $514,911,712 more in taxes during Fiscal Year 2008-2009 without exceeding the Constitutional limit. t/l $700 c: .2 $600 :!: $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $- Proceeds of Taxes Compared to Legal Spending Limit FY 02-03 FY 03-04 FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 I!ia!I!iI Proceeds of Taxes -+-Limit -290- LEGAL DEBT MARGIN Under State law, the City has a legal debt limitation not to exceed 15% of the total assessed valuation of taxable property within City boundaries. As of June 30, 2009 the City's legal debt limit is $3,693,009,150. In accordance with California Government Code Section 43605, only the City's general obligation bonds are subject to this limit. As the City of Chula Vista currently has no General Obligation Bonds outstanding it is not at risk of exceeding the legal limit. The table below summarizes the City's debt limit margin. Computation of Debt Limit Margin Fiscal Years Ended 2007 through 2009 Total Assessed Valuation June 30, 2007 $ 21,340,592,935 $ June 30, 2008 24,358,502,560 $ June 30, 2009 24,620,061,000 Debt Limitation-15% of Assessed Valuation Less: General Obligation Bonds Outstanding Legal Debt Margin $ 3,201,088,940 $ $ $ $ 3,201,088,940 $ 3,653,775,384 $ $ 3,653,775,384 $ 3,693,009,150 3,693,009,150 -291- ~ fl ~hrij 1~1 I;:i:b" 4il\~: "~"''''''' kl,; ~"",~ U. ;mmt"i'Jmillm~riiu' crnr tiOf: r i" ~~j}~, '''"~I"~ ~~~" r, ,l\,,~ ~";';~;".., ' 4 .." ;,.,"".;'; ,,;,,;, Ii; i'. -292- LIST OF ACRONYMS ADA - American with Disabilities Act ALS - Advanced Life Support ASSE - American Society of Safety Engineers BLS - Basic Life Support BPS - Building Project Supervisor BCT - Bayfront Conservancy Trust BPM - Building Project Manager BRT - Business Response Team CAD - Computer Aided Dispatch CAFR - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CalPERS - California Public Employees Retirement System CAST - Citizens Adversity Support Team CBAG - California Border Alliance Group CDBG - Community Development Block Grant CDFG - California Department of Fish and-Game CD-ROM - Compact Disk Read Only Memory CEO - Chief Executive Officer CES - Conservation Environmental Services -293- CHIP - Community Housing Improvement Program CIP - Capitallmprovernent Plan/Project/Program CLSA - California Library Services Act CMP - Corrugated Metal Pipe COP - Community Oriented Policing COPS MORE - Community Oriented Policing Services Making Officer Redeployment Effective CPI - Consumer Price Index CSO - Community Service Officer CSR - Customer Service Representative CVRC - Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation CVT - Chula Vista Transit DASH - Dynamic After School Hours DDA - Disposition and Development Agreement DIF - Development Impact Fee EDC - Economic Development Commission EDS - Economic Development Strategy EMS - Emergency Medical Services ENA - Exclusive Negotiating Agreements EOC - Emergency Operation Center ERA - Economic Research Associates ERAF - Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund FPPC - Fair Political Practices FOG - Fats, Oils and Grease FTA - Federal Transit Administration FTE - Full-Time Equivalent FY - Fiscal Year GAAP - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles -294- GASB - Governmental Accounting Standards Board GFOA - Government Finance Officers of America GIS - Geographic Information System GMOC - Growth Management Oversight Committee HAZCOM - Hazardous Communications HOA - Home Owners Association HR - Human Resources HUD - Housing and Urban Development HVAC - Heating\VentilationlAir Conditioning IFAS - Integrated Fund Accounting System IIPP - Injury Illness Prevention Program IMA - Infrastructure Modules Applications ITS - Information Technology Services JPA - Joint Powers Authority LAD - Landscape Architecture Division LAN - Local Area Network LEAP (Community Development) - Local Employer Assistance Program LEAP (Library) - Library Educational Afterschool Program MBPS - Mega Bytes Per Second MGD - Million Gallons per Day MHZ - Megahertz MIS - Management and Information Systems\Services MOU - Memorandum of Understanding MSCP - Multiple Species Conservation Plan MTDB - Metropolitan Transit Development Board MTS - Metropolitan Transit System NCCP - Natural Comrnunity Conservation Plan -295- - NPDES - National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ODT - Organizational Development and Training PSB - Public Services Building PBID - Property-based Business Improvement District PDM - Project Design and Management PFDIF - Public Facilities Development Impact Fees PLF - Public Library Foundation Act POP - Projected Oriented Policing RCS - Regional Communications System RCT - Residential Construction Tax RDA - Redevelopment Agency RFP - Request for Proposals RFQ - Request for Qualifications RVT - Registered Veterinarian Technician SANDAG - San Diego Association of Governments SANDPIPA - San Diego Pooled Insurance Policy Association SBEZ - South Bay Enterprise Zone SCADA - Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition SPA - Specific Planning Area SRA - Community Development Block Grant SRO - School Resource Officer SSMP - Sewer System Management Plan STRETCH - Safe Time For Recreation, Enrichment And Tutoring TDA - Transportation Development Act TDIF - Transportation Development Impact Fee UCSP - Urban Core Specific Plan USFWS - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service -296- GLOSSARY Accrual Basis of Accounting - The accounting basis used by the City by which transactions are recognized when they occur, regardless of the timing of cash receipts and disbursements. Accounting System - The collective set of records and procedures used to record, classify, and report information on the financial status and operations of the City. Accounts Payable -. Amounts owed by the City to external entities for goods and services received. Accounts Receivable - Amounts due to the City from external entities for goods and services furnished. Adopted Budget - The title of the budget following its formal adoption by resolution of the City Council. Ad Valorem - In proportion to value, a basis for levy of taxes on property. Amended Budget - The title of the budget version that includes all amendments to the Adopted Budget approved by Council throughout the fiscal year. Appropriation - A legislative act by the City Council authorizing the expenditure of a designated' amount of public funds for a specific purpose. -297- Audit - An examination of City records and accounts by an external source to check their validity and accuracy. Balanced Budget - The amount of budgeted expenditures is equal to or less than the amount of budgeted revenues plus other available sources. Bond - A certificate of debt issued by a government or corporation guaranteeing payment of the original investment plus interest by a specified future date. Budget - A spending plan and policy guide comprised of an itemized summary of the City's probable expenditures and revenues for a given fiscal year. Calendar Year (CY) - The 12-month period from January through December. Capital Expenditures - Expenditures related to the acquisition, replacement, or improvement of a section of Chula Vista's infrastructure. Capital Improvement Program - The long-range construction plan designed to foresee and address the City's future need of physical improvements or additions of a fixed or permanent nature (e.g. a new fire station, replacement of a street signal) Capital Project - Any major construction, acquisition, or renovation that increases the useful life of the City's physical assets or adds to their value. Capital Project Funds - Funds that are utilized to account for resources used for the acquisition and construction of capital facilities by the City, with the exception of those assets financed by proprietary funds. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds - Funds received from the federal government and expenditures as prescribed under the Community Development Grant Program. Debt Service Funds- Funds used for payment of interest and principal to holders of the City's various debt instruments. -298- Deferred Maintenance - A backlog of needed .repairs to City facilities including facility maintenance, painting and structural repairs. Depreciation - The expense incurred with the expiration of a capital asset. Direct Costs - Operational expenditures exclusive to a specific service or program. Discretionary Revenue - Revenues that are generated by general or specific taxing authority such as Property or Sales Taxes. Encumbrance - The designation or reserving of funds to buy an item or service. Enterprise Funds - Funds established to account for specific services funded directly by fees and charges to users such as sewer services. These funds are intended to be self-supporting. Expenditure - The actual outlay of monies set aside by appropriation for identified goods and services. Fiscal Year (FY) - The twelve-month period beginning July 1st and ending June 30th of the subsequent calendar year. Fixed Assets - An asset with a useful life greater than three years. Fringe Benefits - This consists of the costs to provide employee benefits that include the flexible benefit program, insurance, and retirement. Full-time Equivalent Positions (FTE) - The conversion of part-time, temporary, or volunteer positions to a decimal equivalent of a full-time position based on an annual amount of 2,080 hours worked. Fund - A set of interrelated accounts to record revenu'es and expenditures. Fund Balance - The excess of an entity's assets over its liabilities. A negative fund balance is sometimes referred to as a deficit. -299- Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - A uniform set of minimum standards for external financial accounting and reporting. Gann Appropriation limit - A State of California mandated appropriation limit imposed on local jurisdictions. General Fund - The City's main operating fund that is used to pay for City services. General Plan - The fundamental policy document that guides the City's future growth and development. General Revenue - See Discretionary Revenues. Grants - A contribution by a government or other organization to provide funding for a specific project. Grants can either be classified as capital projects or programmatic, depending on the grant. Indirect Cost - Costs that are essential to the operation of the City but not exclusive to any specific service or program. Indirect costs are primarily associated with support departments such as City Clerk, City Attorney, Administration, Management Information Systems (MIS), Human Resources, and Finance. Infrastructure - Basic physical assets such as buildings, streets, sewers, and parks. Interest Expense - Interest costs paid by Chula Vista on loans and bonds. Internal Service Funds- Funds that are used to finance and account for goods, special activities, and services performed by one City department for other City departments on a cost reimbursement basis. levy - To impose of collect a tax, special assessments; or charges for the suppo"rt of City services Liability - Debt or other legal obligations arising out of past transactions that will be liquidated, renewed, or refunded at some future date. -300- Memorandum of Understanding - A document detailing the outcomes of labor negotiations between the City and its various bargaining units. Municipal Code - A collection of ordinances approved by City Council. Operating Budget - Costs associated with the on-going municipal services. Ordinance - A formal legislative enactment by the City Council. Other Expenditures- All budgeted expenditures that do not fall into one of the three primary expenditure categories: Personnel, Supplies and Services, and Capital. Personnel Services Expenditures - Expenses related to employee compensation including salaries, wages, and benefits. Program Revenue - Revenues generated by a given activity. Proposed Budget - The title of the budget prior to its formal adoption by resolution of the City Council. Reserves - The portion of the General Fund balance set aside for contingencies Resolution - A special order of the City Council that requires less legal formality than an Ordinance. Revenue - Funds received from various sources to finance expenditures. Sewer Funds- Funds that account for revenues and expenditures related to the City's sewer programs, including maintenance and expansion of the City's conveyance system and payment of Metro Sewer treatment costs. Special Revenue Funds - Funds that are used to account for proceeds derived from specific revenues sources, which are legally restricted to expenditures for special purposes. (e.g. Transportation Funds, parking Funds, Public Safety Funds) -301- Spending Plan - A preliminary budget approved by Council contingent upon subsequent adoption of appropriations. Supplies and Services Expenditures - Expenditures for supplies required for the daily operation of the City and for contractual and professional services. Transient OccupanclI Tax (TOT) - A tax that is charged on occupants of hotel and motel rooms in the City. Yield - The rate of return earned on an investment based on the price paid. -302- CHULA VISTA AT A GLANCE GENERAL INFORMATION Incorporated ... ................. ............. .. .1911 Government.. ". ..... Council/Manager Bond Rating............ .......................... .. .A- POPULATION BY ETHNIC GROUP Asian I Other 17% Black 4% Hispanic 51% EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT 1 Graduate or professional degree 7% 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 12% Associate Deg ree 8% igh School, graduate 22% 1 Educational Attainment is based on population 25 years and over 275 250 III 225 'C ~ 200 ~ ~ 175 o ~ 150 125 100 -303- POPULATtON Population Median Age .............................. 233,108 ............................... 33.2 CHULA VISTA POPULATION GROWTH 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09' 10' 11' 12' 13' Note: The 1999 - 2008 population fi9ures are for January 1 ,t of the fiscal year The 2009 to 2013 population estimate assumes a growth rate of approximately 1.9%. Source: California Department of Finance ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Chula Vista Elementary School District www.cvesd.org (619) 425-9600 Number of Schools ........... .. .......... .... ...44 Projected Enrollment .........................27,400 Average Class Size Kindergarten - 3rd grade .....................20 Grades 4 - 6 ...................... .......... .29 SECONDARY SCHOOLS Sweetwater Union High School District www.suhsd.k12.ca.us (619) 691-5500 Number of Schools: .......... .............. 32 Projected Enrollment. ................ .42,083 Average Class Size ..................... ... ........26 ."-",.. HOUSING Housing Units............................. .....77,452 Persons Per Household...... .. ...... ...... 3.06 Vacancy Rate ................ . ...... ........ 3.00% HOUSEHOLD INCOME Median Income ...................... ... ....$72,236 2% 10% 14% 14% D< $15,000 $30,000 - $44,999 '" $60,000 - $74,999 I!I $100,000 - $199,999 iii $15,000 - $29,999 D $45,000 - $59,999 D $75,000 - $99,999 >= $200,000 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS HOUSING TYPE Single Family. . ........................... ...40,847 Multiple Family........... .............32,879 Mobile Homes.................................... 3,726 PUBLIC SAFETY Fire Uniform Strength ...........................118 Fire Stations... ..... .. . . . .... .. ..... .... ... ....9 Priority Fire Calls For Service2. . 12,231 Police Uniform Strength........................ 244 Priority Police Calls for Service2 ......75,026 COMMUNITY FACILITIES Acres of Developed Parks ....... .. .... . .. 520 Total Number of Parks........... .. .. . ...... .62 Ubrnri9..........................................3 Recreation Facilities... . ....... ................. 11 Sources: San Diego Association of Governments; California Department of Finance; City of Chula Vista staff 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Ii!ISingle Family -304- 2004 2005 2006 !i Multi-Family 2007 2008 2009 2 Call for service data is for fiscal year 2008 <, " ~ Ctmi'; 'il.r .l:,;~ " ::!ilt31 . ~l1{" $(:~tB e'" C' ,, , ',,' : Cou~t" .. '.. S. yof.' . anD" .'. ". :. lego>. j ... ~. ,~- \ , , '. ,'1 ' :\ .\ I ",\.' <,: .County . f .. 0 ~anDiego ,,',:' 'I, ,.,' , .,. "3'''--'''' ,.:, "'- " . . Noi to Scale C) NORTH LIGabeFI I es\Grilphl~~ &. T f'mplatcsWlclnlty mapil10411f)7 -~ COt . I Y of Chula V" V Ista ICINITY MAP -305- ',1;' "j!l.m< ".':" lp-i: ,,:, 'd, P:' 1, 1'.' 1111[:, ,':l,~ I:' 1,':":)',11,]'1,;;; ,;,;'", ,'!;1~:;:::;~ j)1;T:.; ::i ;:~!":I' ~ ,):' :1: ", ':i'; """,.1'1 " !'W;.,),:',," ': '.':JY:l~';'" ""'", !:'.::~:; ,: :,:,;, :'\r,i1: I; ~ "~/: ;"'!: l'i_:' I"" , ::1.." ;!g!; ~ :r ~\ t~,.: ;,. " .:4,:", :"). I:~~ " ,,;,1 ,'". ll~tt ,,,\ 1,," '"""I ",'1--' ---m'P""<"_-....,--.~." h..~;;,l;;;,),": '.,<.. '1.'."', )'>,_ ., ~.:1' ":,,,,;',:~, "I,~"l:<,~j::, ;, <. " ~ I~'" \" ",,",'.: >~'!'.',r . Co"; '~'<', , ' ~~ J,"i',',;l.:, ~,.',' i',,' , ~' ".'I;/..:~!.; ::~' '. _, ',I ;~,I.'~, 'if!))',' <~'>ji::' <1, 'j ~-!.' , . ~, .' " ::'[11 ~~~ ~-- ,', ;:ai:.wl --.....~~ ~ ----- On' OF CHULA VISTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROPOSED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 CHERYL COX MAYOR JOHN MCCANN STEVE CASTANEDA RUDY RAMIREZ PAMELA BENSOUSSAN COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER JIM SANDOVAL CITY MANAGER DONNA NORRIS CITY CLERK BART MIESFELD CITY ATTORNEY ~~ft-. ~~ ' ,~. ..,..', '. ,: ",,-,#' , -- -- - - ~'~~~ ~..................""- CllY OF CHULA VISTA ADMINISTRATION Jim Sandoval City Manager Scott Tulloch Assistant City Manager Leah Browder Deputy City Manager/Library Director Gary Halbert Deputy City Manager/Director of Development Services DIRECTORS Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance/Treasurer Michael Meacham Director of Conservation and Environmental Services Richard Hopkins Director of Public. Works / City Engineer Dave Hanneman Fire Chief Louie Vigna piano Director of Information Technology Services Kelly Bacon Director of Human Resources Richard Emerson Chief of Police Buck Martin Director of Recreation / Nature Center TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................... ....... ...............................................1 PROGRAM OVERViEW.................................................... ................................. ... .........2 REVENUE SUMMARy................................. ............. ............................... ..... .................4 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY. ......... ................ ............... ............ ......... .....8 "CIP PROJECT GEOGRAPHICAL BALANCE. ................. . .. ............... .................. ..............12 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................... ................ ..................................................... .........14 REPORTS AND TABLES ..... ........... .................. ......... . ...... ........... ............15 PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORTS. .... ..................... ....... ................ ... .........16 GLOSSARY OF FINANCE AND BUDGET TERMS... ........ ... ............... ... 101 INDEX... ... ................... ..... . ........... .................. ......................... .........104 INTRODUCTION As a result of the nationwide economic downturn, and reduced revenues coming into the City, City staff has conducted a comprehensive review of its Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and . project schedules. In an effort to stimulate the economy and take advantage of good market prices an aggressive project schedule is proposed for the coming fiscal year. As a result new grant funds including the ARRA (American .Recover and Reinvestment Act) funding and available funds from the prior year CIP appropriations have been reprogrammed and the proposed FY 2009-10 CIP totals $30.7 million, an increase of about 37% over last year's 2008- 09 CIP. The proposed CIP budget is the result of three major accomplishments by the Department of Public Works: . Completion of Phase I, the redesigning and web_based automation of the City of Chula Vista's Capital Improvement Program and its management. In December 2008, the City Council awarded a contract to CIPPlanner and implemented CIPAce for automation of the CIP. CIPAce is a web-based enterprise class software application that enables agencies to manage their entire capital program by a single database. The project included configuration analysis, data migration, user training and integration of the City's financial system, project and resource management. The integrated approach and five year programming enhances the City's ability to effectively manage the Capital Improvement Program portfolio over the course of its Iifecycle. This system enables staff to assess, evaluate, prioritize and manage Capital projects on a daily basis in an effort to determine the most optimal use of funds and human resources as well as track project status and related efficiency measures. Phase II (Fiscal Integration) and Phase III (Resource and Project Management) are anticipated to be complete in FY 2009-10. . Preparation of a forecasted five-year capital program. The proposed 2010-14 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget will serve as a multi-year planning instrument to identify needs and financing sources for public infrastructure improvements. The goal is two-fold: 1) identify and plan for infrastructure improvements and 2) inform city residents how the City plans to address significant capital needs over the next five years. Please note that although capital projects are scheduled throughout the five-year plan, only those programs scheduled during the first year are funded and adopted as part of the Annual Budget. Programs slated for design and construction in subsequent years may be adjusted to reflect priority changes or funding restraints. . Award of $6.2 million in new grant funding (includes ARRA funding of $3.86 million) for Capital Improvement Projects, thus reducing the reliance in the General Fund. The following is a summary of those projects: o Industrial Blvd - Bike Lane & Pedestrian Improvements ($284K) o Pavement Rehabilitation - Federal Aid Highways ($2.61 million) o Traffic Signal Modification 4th & Main, Beyer ($450K) o Traffic Signal Modification 3rd & Montgomery ($300K) o Third Avenue Streets cape Implementation Project ($2 million) o Bicycle Amenities for commuters (prior year appropriation) o Light Rail Trolley Corridor Study in Chula Vista (mid year) o I-80S South TLSP Grant (via SANDAG) o Environmental Mitigation Program ($373K) o Public Library Federal Grant ($9SK) o Community Development Block Grant - R ($SOOK) Despite staff's success in developing the proposed CIP budget, significant challenges continue to face the City due to deteriorating infrastructure that has exceeded service life and due to limited availability of resources. The most recent example is the failure of five storm drains in the City. In February and March 2009, three corrugated metal pipe (CMP) storm drain failures were discovered at three locations in close proximity to residential structures in the City of Chula Vista. These failures occurred at (1) 882 Helix Avenue, (2) 106 EI Capitan Drive, and (3) 1188 Neptune Drive. Each of these CMP failures, if not repaired, poses an imminent threat to public safety and private property. In addition, staff was made aware of a (7-ft by 7-ft by 10-ft deep) sinkhole on Thursday, February 19, 2009 that had developed at (4) 1S26 Grand Teton Court due to the displacement of concrete storm drain pipe segments. A more recent failure occurred at (S) Poggi Channel, north and south of Rancho Road (36" low-flow pipe). All of these emergency repairs must be undertaken to protect life and property and are proposed for funding using TransNet funds. A new project is being proposed in FY10 to address these failures. The final proposed appropriations to be incorporated in the FY 2009-10 budget are anticipated to go to City Council for adoption in June 2009. CIP Document The CIP document's is an integral part of the City's overall budget program. As with past budgets, this document is similar in its format. In an effort to make the document user-friendly, it has been partitioned into three categories. The first section provides a summary of the general nature of the program, revenue and expenditure summary and analysis of the geographical distribution of the projects included in the program. The second section contains a variety of tables that depict the program from a number of perspectives, including sorting projects by type, location and funding source. This section also contains some historical information and the five-year funding projections for each project contained in the program. The last section, which makes up the bulk of the document, contains descriptions of all projects that are being funded as part of the FY 2009-10 budget. These descriptions include the Location, Responsible Department, Intent, Justification and Funding Allocation. The Glossary provides definitions and the Index includes a comprehensive list of the projects contained in the budget, including the project name, page it can be found on, project number and accounting project number. . PROGRAM OVERVIEW To follow is the fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The program outlined herein was developed with two main goals in mind. The first is to build upon the City's growing recognition. of the need for additional commitment and funding for infrastructure preservation efforts. The second goal is to recognize the changing fiscal position of the City and downturn in development-related capital revenues. While there are still several development-related capital 2 projects in the program, the overall CIP seeks to balance both the types of projects and the geographical locations where projects would occur to best meet the needs of the City and its residents, businesses and visitors. I Significant funding is dedicated to on-going infrastructure rehabilitation projects. These include streets, sidewalks and sewers. In particular, street-related rehabilitation projects are predominant in this program. These projects occur on a citywide basis and are part of a comprehensive process that the City performs every year to assess the most cost efficient manner to preserve and rehabilitate the City's infrastructure. The City utilizes a comprehensive pavement management system, which forms the basis for the development of current and future pavement rehabilitation projects. With regard to the street rehabilitation effort, the City continues to focus significant attention and resources on street improvements in western Chula Vista. A number of projects have been undertaken in the past several years, including over $10 million of street rehabilitation projects, as well as significant sidewalk improvements. That effort will continue and will also include the formation of assessment districts on a number of streets in the Castle Park neighborhood. During fiscal year 2007-08, the City successfully completed the process for obtaining a $9.5 million loan from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for street improvements in the Castle Park neighborhood. Those loan proceeds became available to the City in June of 2008 and will be paid back from the City's annual allotment of CDBG funds. Construction of First Avenue, between Naples Street and Palomar Street, is complete and a number of street improvement projects are moving forward, including work on Glenhaven Way (west of First Avenue), Oxford Street (Third Avenue to Alpine Avenue) and Second Avenue (Naples Street to Palomar Street) Once these projects on the main streets in the neighborhood are completed, remaining funds will be utilized on local streets within the Castle Park neighborhood. The City continues to focus on its Annual Sewer Rehabilitation Program, which expends approximately $1 to $2 million annually for the replacement and rehabilitation of sewer pipes and manholes. The City also utilizes standardized evaluation and ranking criteria in televising and evaluating the condition of sewers in order to assure that the most critically impacted sewer infrastructure is replaced or rehabilitated first. As previously mentioned, over the last several years the City has evaluated the condition of its Storm Drain facilities, which includes approximately 88,000 lineal feet of corrugated metal pipe (CMP) storm drain within the City limits CMP storm drains have not been allowed for permanent use in the City of Chula Vista for over 20 years due to more rapid deterioration than other types of pipes, such as plastic and reinforced concrete pipes. The deteriorating CMP storm drains were categorized as Priorities 1 thru 4, as follows. Priorit 1 2 3 4 5 Lineal Feet of CMP 2,282 ft 21,858ft 9,698 ft 2,437 ft 6,785 ft Much of the CMP identified as Priority 1 has been rehabilitated However, due to limited funding, priorities 2,3 and 4 are being addressed on an as-needed basis, either after failure has 3 occurred or when failure is imminent. The CIP Program seeks to find dedicated funding for this critical program; however, due to eligibility limitations and availability of such funds, it has been increasingly difficult to fund CMP replacement and rehabilitation work. A total of $1.2 million in TransNet monies are being proposed to fund calendar year 2009 emergency drainage projects. While this focus on infrastructure continues, the City has also engaged in a program for the construction of several facilities. Since 2002, the City has undertaken over $63 million of new park and recreation facility construction. Construction activities have commenced on Mt. San Miguel Community Park and All Seasons Park construction is proposed in the FY 2009-10 program. Over 151 acres of new parkland and 58,000 square feet of new recreation center space will have been. added between 2002 and the end of fiscal year 2008-09. The $50 million renovation of the Civic Center Complex is complete and the buildings are fully occupied. The design of the Rancho Del Rey Library is complete and construction is planned to commence as soon as sufficient Public Facilities Development Impact Fees (PFDIF) are generated and/or library construction grant funding is secured. Given the economic conditions within the construction/development industry, as well as the competitive nature of library grants, it is not possible at this point in time to estimate a construction schedule. REVENUE SUMMARY In the fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program, there are a number of key funding sources; to follow is a brief description of the most programmed funding sources. Transportation Sales Tax Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) funds are derived from sales tax revenues levied in San Diego County that are collected by the State specifically for use on transportation related projects in San Diego County. The regional metropolitan planning agency, San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), programs these funds to municipalities within San Diego County. Revenues vary from year to year, depending on the amount of sales tax available to the region and the number and costs of projects for which municipalities, local transit, and Caltrans request funding The revenue approved for municipalities is based on the specific cost estimates that are required to be submitted as part of the annual request for funding. In fiscal year 2009-10, Transportation Sales Tax proposed budgets are $8.35 million, with an additional $3.36 million of TransNet ARRA funds (TransNet funds re-allocated from Caltrans projects that received Federal ARRA funding for construction). Of that amount, approximately $7 7 million is programmed for pavement rehabilitation. A number of smaller traffic congestion improvement projects and transportation planning efforts are also funded from TransNet. The City continues to ensure that a minimum of 70% of its TransNet funds are allocated to congestion relief efforts. This limits the City's use of these funds for minor pavement rehabilitation efforts to a maximum 30% of the City's annual allocation. The City intends to explore the possibility of dedicating additional amounts to minor pavement efforts (projects with less than a one-inch thick overlay) with SANDAG in the future. Sewer Facility Replacement Fund The Sewer Facility Replacement Fund is a fee based revenue source that all properties pay each month as part of their sewer bills. The funds can be utilized to replace, rehabilitate or 4 upgrade existing sewer facilities. In fiscal year 2009-10, a total of $0.7 million is proposed to be funded. Among the projects receiving funding are the annual rehabilitation program ($0.3 million) and Robinhood Ranch II Pump Station Improvements ($0.4 million). In addition, approximately $5.8 million.of existing funding and projects will carry over. Traffic Signal Fee The Traffic Signal Fee is a trip based development impact fee that is charged with the issuance of building permits for new construction. The fee can be utilized for the installation and upgrade of traffic signals throughout the City. In fiscal year 2009-10, it is proposed that $1.067 million be funded. Traffic Signal Fees are down, as are all development related revenues, and the projects list for the fund has been re-prioritized. However, the City has received notification of American Recovery Reinvestment Act funds for eligible Traffic projects, which allowed for approximately $0.75 million of Traffic Signal funds to be reallocated to other projects. Proposition 1 B Highway Funds In 2006-07, the voters of the state approved Proposition 1 B. This proposition included funds to be provided to cities within the state for local roadway improvements. The City will receive a .total of approximately $7 million, $3.6 million in fiscal year 2008-09 and the remaining portion in fiscal year 2009-10. Prop 42 (Traffic Congestion Relief Fund) Several years ago, the voters approved Proposition 42, which provided funding for cities to improve streets. The funds can only be utilized for street improvements and the City has utilized these funds to augment its annual pavement rehabilitation efforts. In fiscal year 2008- 09, the amount budgeted from this fund for this purpose is $1 million. In FY2009-10, the proposed amount to be budgeted is $348,000. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds Each year, the City receives approximately $1.9 million in CDBG funds Of this amount, approximately $1.1 million is available for capital improvement projects. The City of Chula Vista received Section 108 loan funds in June of 2008 for the Castle Park street improvement projects; the debt service on that loan will be paid back from the City's annual allotment of CDBG funds. This will reduce the amount of CDBG funds available for other capital projects to approximately $.5 million annually for the next ten years. All of these funds are programmed for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Curb Ramp construction The City's ADA Annual Curb Ramp Program improves pedestrian accessibility and walkability for all citizens, in compliance with ADA requirements and standards. Ramps are constructed in priority order, from a Transition Plan of approximately 1200 ramps approved by the City Council, and based primarily on proximity to public and transit services, public facilities, schools, and commercial facilities. Upon completion of the ramps identified in the Transition Plan, retrofits of existing, older ramps will be required to provide greater levels of accessibility. 5 Miscellaneous Grants The City has applied for and been approved for various grants to fund Capital Improvement Projects. These grants include Smart Growth. Incentive, TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program and Public Library Federal Grants. Cumulatively, the amounts budgeted for FY 2009- 10 is approximately $2.8 million (not including ARRA exchange funds). In addition, the City continues to pursue American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funds. The City was recently approved for $3.36 million in ARRA funds via an exchange in TransNet funds through SANDAG and $.5 million in CDBG-R (ARRA) funds. These funds are programmed in the FY 2009-10 program for Pavement, Traffic Signal related projects and Third Avenue Streetscape. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funds President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act into law, which provides "economic stimulus" funds in the amount of $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) nationwide. A large portion of the ARRA funds are intended to benefit individuals such as through tax relief, Medicaid, and mortgage assistance. Another portion is intended to assist public agencies in providing services and improving infrastructure to keep people employed as well as to create new jobs. City staff has been working diligently since before adoption of ARRA to identify opportunities that would benefit Chula Vista and be ready for aggressive timelines and application periods. In anticipation of the bill, the U.S. Conference of Mayors asked cities to come up with ready-to-go projects that would create jobs and invest in infrastructure. Along with other San Diego county cities through SANDAG, Chula Vista identified a number of projects already identified as "shovel ready" that can start immediately. Most cities focused on proposals for roads, sewer and other infrastructure projects. In all, Chula Vista's wish list added up to about $540 million. The thought was to identify as many projects as possible in the instance that funds would become available. The City already knows of many projects that would benefit the community, if funding were available. Many of the ARRA funds come with very specific eligibility criteria and regulatory guidelines. If the City has some projects already identified that would meet that criteria, then that could free up less restrictive money for other community projects. For example, Federal highway funds generally may only be used on designated arterial roadways. There are a number of infrastructure projects already identified in the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan and the Western Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Any federal highway funds received by the City would be used ondesignated arterial roadways even if they are lower on the priority list, thereby making more local funds, such as TransNet, available for use on local streets. Transparency is an important component of ARRA. The Federal government has created a website to convey results and performance measurements to the public. Similarly, it will be important to keep our local residents apprised ofthe City's actions and results with ARRA funds. City staff has created a scorecard to track potential applications for ARRA funds, funds received, and performance with funds received. The scorecard and any related ARRA information will be maintained on the City's website. 6 The following chart summarizes the funding sources for the Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 2009-10. FY10 Proposed CIP Program by Funding Source Transportation Grants 15.07% Park Acquisition and Development (PAD) 6.51% Traffic Signal /_~ 347% 1,\----__________ Miscellaneous / \ 0.39% /1 "-- Library Grants Sewer Funds -' CDBG (&. CDBG- 0.64% 5.63% R) 3.59% / TransNet /~ 38.10% Redevelopment Funds 3.33% Development // Impact Funds -// (DIF) 13.32% Miscell~neo.us Grants 9.94% 7 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY The capital budget complements the operating budget by providing funding for major capital projects. The fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) plan includes $30 million in funding. It should be noted that of that amount, approximately $4.5 million are reallocation of existing funds from prior years. In addition, there is approximately $10 million of existing appropriations that will carry over into FY10. The majority of the funding recommended with the adoption of the budget pertains to the rehabilitation/improvement of existing facilities. The chart below provides a breakdown, by project type, of the total $30.7 million of appropriations proposed with this budget. FY10 Proposed Funding by Project Type Traffic 10%\ Sewer 5% \ Park and Recreation 7% Drainage 8% Gen GovtlOther ~ ProjectsfRDA / I Library 4% / 1% / Major Streets __/ 26% Local Streets 39% Facilities The total cost of building and park facilities over the last 15 years has exceed $100 million, which includes the completion of the renovations to the Civic Center Complex, various recreational facilities, new and renovated parks, new and renovated fire stations and other projects. The funding sources for these projects included development impact fees (DIF), residential construction tax (RCT), redevelopment funds (RDA), grants and the General Fund. With respect to the Civic Center, the project has been completed and fully occupied as of November 2008. The final component to the Civic Center project will be the construction of a new Fire Station No.1. The Master Plan for the Fire Facility network has been completed. Libraries The City received $95,000 in Public Library Federal Funding proposed to fund the Civic Center Library Veterans Wing. Another major project is the construction of the Rancho del Rey Library, which will be one of four branch libraries serving the four corners of the City. The 31,129 square-foot facility will be a fullcservice library, with a capacity of up to 130,000 books, audio- visual materials and newspapers and magazines. Besides some 28,000 items in Spanish, there will also be unique cultural heritage collections focusing on Filipino, Pan-Asian and Hispanic cultures in ref/ection of the community's diversity. The estim.ated cost of the project is $19.1 million. The design of the library has been completed. Due to the slowdown in development activities, the fund balance of the PFDIF (which is responsible for 100% of the costs of the 8 project) is not sufficient to move forward to construction. It is unknown when sufficient PFDIF revenues will be available to commence construction. Parks Numerous major neighborhood parks, including Cotton'wood Park, Heritage Park, Breezewood Park, Harvest Park and Santa Venetia Park in Otay Ranch and Sunset View Park in Eastlake Greens were completed. In fiscal year 2005-06, Harborside Park, the first new park in western Chula Vista in over 25 years and Mountain Hawk Park in Eastlake Vistas were completed. In addition to these neighborhood parks, three large community parks were also opened to the public. These parks were Veterans Park, Salt Creek Park and Montevalle Park. All three of these facilities included recreation centers. Several other neighborhood parks were completed in fiscal year 2006-07 including, Horizon Park and Winding Walk Park in Otay Ranch. The renovations of Otay Park ($1.9 million) were completed in the spring of 2008. Also, the design of Mt. San Miguel Park, a community park ~"""-"--",,,,,,,,,,""'" in San Miguel Ranch ($7,0 million), has been completed. Funding for Mt. San Miguel Ranch Community Park was appropriated mid-year in FY2008-09 with construction currently underway. The new neighborhood park in Village 7 of Otay Ranch, named All Seasons Park, ($2.9 million) has seen its master plan approve'd and design is nearing completion" It is proposed that $2 million be appropriated in FY2009-10 as necessary to begin construction. Fire Facilities Included in the proposed 5 year CIP forecast is construction of the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) Fire Station. The City is currently negotiating a development agreement to offset the construction costs and operating costs for the EUC fire station. Fire stations one and five are in need of replacement. Built in 1954, fire station five was part of the Montgomery Fire District. This station is 55 years old and in a state of deterioration. This fire station is far past its useful life needing constant repair due to structural damage that has been brought on by age Station 5 is currently in need of a new roof and other major repairs, Fire Station 1 was built in 1948 and is 61 years old. This station also has structural damage due to its age and is in need of a roof. The Fire Department will apply for Economic Stimulus funding (ARRA) to address the replacement of both of these stations as both of these stations meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the grant guidelines. Station 5 is recommended to be relocated to a larger site adjacent to the South Library. The relocation of Station 5 to a larger site will allow the expansion of future service delivery to respond to growth needs. The Fire Facility Master Plan document is being updated to achieve fire and emergency medical service delivery within national public safety standards. The plan will be presented to Council in an upcoming workshop this fall Lastly, discussions are underway regarding Bayfront Capital Improvement Projects as follows: . Bayfront Sewer Lift Station - $12.4* million FY10/11 . Bayfront Fire Station North East corner of Bay Blvd and "J" Street - $12 million FY10/11 . Bayfront Park Improvements - $6.68* million FY11/12 *includes estimated design, project management and contingency , 9 It is anticipated that these projects will be programmed beginning FY 2010-11 and in future years. Infrastructure Projects The infrastructure portion of the CI P budget contains significant funding for a variety of infrastructure' improvements. As discussed above and elsewhere within the City's budget, a substantial amount of the funding is focused on infrastructure improvements in the western portion of the City and preservation of infrastructure citywide. Over the past few years, City staff has presented a number of reports to the City Council with regard to the condition and capacity of existing infrastructure (i.e., pavement, corrugated metal pipe, storm drains, sewers, roadways, etc.) citywide, as well as the lack of sidewalks and other public improvements primarily within the western portion of the City, especially within the Montgomery Annexation area. Adequate funding is currently not available to build new infrastructure and maintain existing infrastructure. Therefore, the CI P strives to balance the need and desire to provide enhanced public facilities, while assuring that existing infrastructure is maintained and preserved in at least a minimally acceptable condition over the long-term. With the adoption of the fiscal year 2004-05 budget, the City Council approved a finan'cing plan for infrastructure improvements in western Chula Vista. This financing plan revolved around a two-pronged financing program. One element of the program was a $9 million bond issue that would be repaid from the City's Residential Construction Tax (RCT) revenues over a period of 30 years. That financing was completed in late summer of 2004. This portion of the financing was earmarked for drainage and park improvements. With the receipt of those funds, work has been completed on a number of drainage projects in western Chula Vista. A total of $4.7 million of the financing was dedicated to drainage improvements. The balance of these funds was utilized to construct Harborside Park ($2.1 million), Otay Park renovations ($1.9 million) and improvements to Lauderbach Park ($.6 million). The second portion of the financing is a $9.5 million loan through the US Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Section 108 loan program. The loan will be repaid through the City's annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement from HUD and will be paid back over a period of 20 years. The Section 108 loan is earmarked for street improvements in the Castle Park area. The City formally submitted its application for the loan in May of 2006 and the loan was approved in fiscal year 2006-07. The loan funds became available to the City in June of 2008. With the approval of the loan, work has commenced on the projects. The City Council directed that the main streets in the neighborhood proceed first. First Avenue is complete, with Oxford Street, and Second Avenue moving forward. Also moving forward is Glenhaven Way. This street is not a main street in the neighborhood; however, it intersects with First Avenue, has sufficient signatures on the assessment district formation petition and offers some economies of scale. 10 Other major efforts are the City's annual pavement management program that will be funded at a level of $7.7 million. This effort is augmented by funds previously appropriated (approximately $10 million are being carried over into the new fiscal year and contracts continue to be issued). In the coming years the city will be seeking other revenue sources to try to maintain a similarly high level of reinvestment in our pavement citywide. In addition, the City was fortunate to receive TransNet ARRA exchange funds totaling $3.36 million. Those funds will be utilized on Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways ($2.61 million) and Traffic Signal Modification Projects ($0.75 million). These funds are being received as TransNet funds, thus providing an additional $3.36 million of programmable funding. Also included in the budget is funding for new ADA accessible curb ramps ($504,922), Traffic Signal Modification and Installations ($1.965 million), and Sewer rehabilitation, Improvements, feasibility study and capacity enhancements ($1.7 million). The budget also includes funding for continued traffic count, monitoring, neighborhood and pedestrian safety, signing and striping, congestion relief programs ($1.185 million). The city was the recipient of Smart Growth Incentive and Environmental Mitigation Program funding. The Smart Growth Incentive is proposed to fund Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements ($2 million), Palomar Gateway Specific Plan ($400,000) and Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements ($283,900). The Environmental Mitigation Program funding is proposed to fund the Cactus Wren Habitation Restoration - Central City Preserve Area ($373,048). Other Several other projeels are being proposed for redevelopment and upgrade/maintenance of information technologies specific to capital improvement projects. The projects proposed include the Downtown Parking District Improvements ($120,000), Storefront Renovation ($150,000) and upgrade / maintenance of the Capital Improvement Software (CIPAce), AutoCAD, GIS OrthophotographylTopography and Survey' Monument Preservation and Replacement Program ($75,000). The replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks at the Public Works Center is also being proposed in the FY10 program. 11 CIP PROJECT GEOGRAPHICAL BALANCE . Council has indicated that one of its primary goals in the coming years is a continued focus on capital and infrastructure needs in the western portion of the City. For this discussion, the term western refers essentially to those areas of the City west of Interstate 805. As a sub-area in the western portion of the City, the projects that are specific to the Montgomery area are broken out separately. Also, a category of projects has been developed that is called Citywide. The types of projects. that are typified by Citywide include by are not limited to the annual pavement rehabilitation program, sidewalk rehabilitation program, ADA Curb ramp program and sewer facility rehabilitation program. As the eastern portion of the City continues to rapidly. develop, there is a substantial need for infrastructure improvements. Developers, as part of their development approval obligations, construct many of the improvements that occur in .the eastern portions of the City. For this reason, those projects which provide public benefit are not part of the City's CIP program. The actual amounts proposed for the geographical areas are depicted below: Location FY 2009-10 Amount Percent Urban Core $588,048 2% Citywide $12,842,973 42% Eastern $5,660,271 19% Montgomery $770,000 3% Southwest $1,367,570 5% Western City $9,514,440 30% ota1 $30,743,302 100% Western Chula Vista Breakdown Location FY 2009-10 Amount Percent Urban Core $588,048 5% Montgomery $770,000 7% Southwest $1,367,570 12% Western City $9,514,440 77% ota1 $12,240,058 100% Given the nature of the citywide projects, it is safe to say that 50% to 60% of those expenditures typically occur in western Chula Vista though this can change from year to year. Assuming that 50% holds true, then 61 % of the capital expenditures programmed for fiscal year 2009-10 are earmarked for western Chula Vista and Montgomery. It must also be noted that the eastern Chula Vista projects that the City itself undertakes are overwhelmingly funded by development impact fees or other revenues directly related to development activities (Traffic Signal 12 FundfTDIF/PAD), thus leaving significant revenue streams available to fund projects in the western portion of the City. FY10 Proposed CIP Program by Geographical Area Urban Core 2% Western City 31% 4% Montgomery 3% "l Eastern 18% 13 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The development of the fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program was a collaborative effort of staff of virtually every department in the City. Early in the process, departments were asked to assign a "departmental liaison" to coordinate their respective department's CIP projects. This collaborative effort has resulted in a well planned, organized and, most importantly, doable capital improvement program that will benefit the citizens of Chula Vista for years to come. In addition, as. approved by Council on December 9, 2008 (Resolution 2008- 276), staff implemented a web-based enterprise class software application called CIPAce to manage the entire program and individual projects from beginning to end. This entailed a comprehensive analysis of the City's existing systems, data compilation, fiscal integration and assessment of the entire capital improvement program. The following staff made this document possible: Redevelopment and Housing Eric Crockett, Mandy Mills, Angelica Davis and Diem Do Angelica Aguilar,.Evelyn Ong, Karim Galeana, Tiffany Allen, Paul Valadez, and Lisa Partee Finance Fire Pablo Quilantan, Jim Garcia Development Services I Planning & Building Mariya Anton Louie Vignapiano, Hermon Howell, Derek Hath, Darrell Boggess and Bob Blackwelder Mary Ladiana, Ed Batchelder, Garry Williams, Tom Adler and Ben Guerrero Library ITS Public Works Iracsema Quilantan, Frank Rivera, Kirk Ammerman, Merce LeClair, Jim Newton, Boushra Salem, Roberto Yano, Jose Gomez, Elizabeth Chopp, Roberto Solorzano, Rick Ryals, Florence Picardal, Matt Little, Silvester Evetovich and Bob Beamon Recreation Buck Martin Police Ed Chew I would like to especially recognize Richard Hopkins, Director of .Public Works and Iracsema Quilantan, Assistant Director of Engineering for their excellent service and guidance in the development of this budget. I would also like to thank Hermon Howell, Derek Hath and Darrell Boggess in ITS and Merce LeClair in Engineering. ITS once again was very helpful in assisting with the implementation of CIPAce and Merce spent many hours coordinating the implementation efforts for CIPAce, gathering information, compiling data and putting it into the easy-to-use format that follows. Respectfully submitted, Jim Sandoval City Manager 14 REPORTS AND TABLES The following pages contain a variety of reports and tables that depict the program from a number of perspectives, including sorting projects by type, location and funding source. In addition, from each perspective a list of "unfunded" projects is provided whereby staff continues to seek alternate funding sources whereby a mid-year appropriation may become necessary and at that time will be brought forth to Council for approval. This section also contains a five-year funding projection for each project contained in the program. 15 TABLE 1 FY 2009/10 Capital Improvement Program Funding Summary By Project Type FY2DD9-1D Proposed Drainage New DR182 - Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue $950,000 New DR183 - Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Avenue tD HilltDp Drive $300,000 New DR180 - Emergency StDrm Drain Replacement $1,200,000 Subtotal $2,450,000 General Government GG 183 - GIS-OrthDphDtDgrahy/T DpDgraphy Project $15,000 GG187 - Replacement Df Fuel StDrage Tanks $72,000 Subtotal $87,000 Library LB137 - AutDmation Advancements & Upgrade $102,644. New LB143 - Civic Center Library Veterans Wing $95,000 Subtotal $197,644 Local Streets STL291 - FDurth Avenue Sidewalk ImprDvements $235,000 STL303 - First Ave Impvmts Palomar - Naples $20,000 STL304 - Glenhaven Way Amy Street Improvments $10,000 16 New New New New New New New New New New New STL305 - Oxford Street Improvents Third to Alpine STL323 - Pedestrian Master Plan STL342 - Second Avenue Improvements-Naples Street to Palomar Street STL346 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation STL351 - Bikeway Master Plan Update STL352 - ADA Curb Ramps FY09-1 0 STL354 - Pavement Major Rehabilitation FY2009-1 0 STL355 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation FY2009-10 STL357 - Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Prop 1 B) STL359 - Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps Construction STL360 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Palomar Street STL361 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements STL362 - Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements STL363 - Sidewalk Safety Program -I Street Sidewalk Improvements Subtotal Major Streets STM354 - North Broadway Reconstruction STM355 - Otay Lakes Road Widening $15,000 $45,000 $125,000 $348,000 $200,000 $504,922 $2,020,000 $450,000 $3,385,407 $205,000 $353,370 $429,200 $3,300,000 $232,440 $11,878,339 $2,368,000 $2,500,000 17 New New New New STM364 - Heritage Road Bridge Reconstruction STM366 - Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways STM367 - South Broadway Improvements, Main Street to Southern City Limits Subtotal Other Projects OP200 - Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program OP202 - CIP Advanced Planning OP206 - Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade OP208 - CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase OP212 - Downtown Parking District Improvements OP217 - Palomar Gateway Specific Plan OP218 - Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area Subtotal Park and Recreation PR279 - All Seasons Park Subtotal Redevelopment RD241 - Storefront Renovation Program Subtotal Sewer $315,271 $2,610,000 $300,000 $8,093,271 $30,000 $92,000 $10,000 $20,000 $120,000 $475,000 $373,048 $1,120,048 ' $2,000,000 $2,000,000 , $150,000 $150,000 18 New New SW234 - Sewer Impvts on Colorado bet J & K SW256 - Robinhood Ranch /I Pump Stn Impvts SW260 - Sewer Rehab for FY09-1 0 SW261 - Industrial Blvd. and Main Street Capacity Enhancement Traffic TF274 - Traffic Count Station and Maintenance Subtotal TF316 - Traffic Signal Installation at Second Avenue and Ouintard Street TF321 - Citywide Traffic Count Program TF325 - Traffic Monitoring Program TF327 - Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program TF330 - Traffic Signal Modification, Fourth & Main, Fourth & Beyer TF331 - Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Montgomery TF332 - Signing and Striping Program TF337 - Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Program TF344 - I 805 Direct Access Ramp E Hand E Palomar TF345 - Traffic Calming Program TF350 - Traffic Signal System Optimization $777,000 $400,000 $300,000 $140,000 $1,617,000 $210,000 $175,000 $90,000 $120,000 $220,000 $450,000 $320,000 $100,000 $300,000 $30,000 $130,000 $50,000 19 New . New TF354 - Traffic Congestion Relief Program TF356 - Otay Mesa Transportation System TF359 - SR54 Corridor and Arterial Operations TF362 - Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 TF366 - Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Upgrade and Modification Program TF370 - Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue TF371 - Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive and Main Street Subtotal Total for All Projects $75,000 $30,000 $30,000 $100,000 $325,000 $145,000 $250,000 $3,150,000 $30,743,302 20 TABLE 1A FY 2009/10 Capitallmpr~vement Program Funding Summary By Project Type (UNFUNDED) FY2009-10 Proposed Drainage DR181 - CMP Rehabilitation and Replacement Program $250,000 Subtotal $250,000 General Government GG187 - Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks $200,000 GG195 - C & R Minor Capital Improvements $100,000 GG204 - Energy Retrofit Phase II $2,000,000 New GG205 - City Facilities Roofing Renovation $325,000 New GG206 - Fire Risers at City Facilities $30,000 Subtotal $2,655,000 Library LB144 - Civic Center Library Remodel $4,500,000 LB 145 - South Chula Vista Library Renovations $1,000,000 Subtotal $5,500,000 Park and Recreation PR212 - Outdoor Sports Court Renovation $72,000 21 PR299 - Greg Rogers Park Restroom Renovation $400,000 New PRNew1 - Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) $800,800 New PRNew2 - Rienstra Park Slope Reconstruction $300,000 New PRNew3 - Hilltop Park Playground Replacement $44,000 Subtotal $1,616,800 Public Safety PS145 - Fire Station 5 Programming & Replacement $12,000,000 Subtotal $12,000,000 Traffic TF338 - Replace City Street Signs (Non-Illuminated) $75,000 New TF372 - Internally Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement Program - Energy Conservation Grant $100,000 Subtotal $175,000 Total for All Projects $22,196,800 22 TABLE 2 FY 2009/10 Capital Improvement Program Summary by Geographical Area FY10 Total Proposed Urban Core OP212 - Downtown Parking District Improvements $120,000 OP218, Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area $373,048 LB143 - Civic Center Library Veterans Wing $95,000 Sub Total $588,048 Citywide GG183 - GIS-OrthophotograhylTopography Project $15,000 DR180 - Emergency Storm Drain Replacement $1,200,000 LB137 - Automation Advancements & Upgrade $102,644 OP200 - Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program $30,000 OP202 - CIP Advanced Planning $92,000 OP206 - Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade $10,000 OP208 - CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase $20,000 STL323 - Pedestrian Master Plan $45,000 STL346 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation $348,000 STL351 - Bikeway Master Plan Update $200,000 STL352 - ADA Curb Ramps FY09-10 $504,922 STL354 - Pavement Major Rehabilitation FY2009-10 $2,020,000 STL355 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation FY2009-1 0 $450,000 STL357 - Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Prop 1 B) $3,385,407 STM366 - Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways $2,610,000 23 SW260 - Sewer Rehab for FY09-10 TF321 - Citywide Traffic Count Program TF325 - Traffic Monitoring Program TF327 - Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program TF332 - Signing and Striping Program TF337 - Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Program TF345 - Traffic Calming Program TF350 - Traffic Signal System Optimization TF354 - Traffic Congestion Relief Program TF362 - Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 TF366 - Traffic Signal and Streetli9ht Systems Upgrade and Modification Program Sub Total Eastern PR279 - All Seasons Park STL359 - Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps Construction STM355 - Otay Lakes Road Widening STM364 - Heritage Road Bridge Reconstruction SW256 - Robinhood Ranch II Pump Stn Impvts TF27 4 - Traffic Count Station and Maintenance TF344 - I 805 Direct Access Ramp E Hand E Palomar Sub Total Montgomery STL303 - First Ave Impvmts Palomar - Naples STL304 - Glenhaven Way Amy Street Improvments STL305 - Oxford Street Improvents Third to Alpine TF331 - Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Montgomery $300,000 $90,000 $120,000 $220,000 $100,000 $300,000 $130,000 $50,000 $75,000 $100,000 $325,000 $12,842,973 $2,000,000 $205,000 $2,500,000 $315,271 $400,000 $210,000 $30,000 $5,660,271 $20,000 $10,000 $15,000 $320,000 24 TF356 - Otay Mesa Transportation System $30,000 STL342 - Second Avenue Improvements-Naples Street to Palomar Street $125,000 TF371 - Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive and Main Street $250,000 Sub Total $770,000 Southwest STM367 - South Broadway Improvements, Main Street to Southern City Limits $300,000 STL360 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Palomar Street $353,370 STL361 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements $429,200 SW261 - Industrial Blvd. and Main Street Capacity Enhancement $140,000 TF370 - Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue $145,000 Sub Total $1,367,570 Western City DR182 - Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue $950,000 DR183 - Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Avenue to Hilltop Drive $300,000 GG187 - Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks $72,000 OP217 - Palomar Gateway Specific Plan $475,000 RD241 - Storefront Renovation Program $150,000 STL291 - Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements $235,000 STL362 - Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements $3,300,000 STL363 - Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements $232,440 STM354 - North Broadway Reconstruction $2,368,000 SW234 - Sewer Impvts on Colorado bet J & K $777,000 TF316 _ Traffic Signal Installation at Second Avenue and Quintard Street $175,000 TF330 - Traffic Signal Modification, Fourth & Main, Fourth & Beyer $450,000 TF359 - SR54 Corridor and Arterial Operations $30,000 25 _~'r' .. ..._~, TABLE 2A FY 2009/10 Capital Improvement Program Summary by Geographical Area (UNFUNDED) FY2009-10 Proposed Central PR299 - Greg Rogers Park Restroom Renovation $400,000 Subtotal $400,000 Citywide DR181 - CMP Rehabilitation and Replacement Program $250,000 GG195 - C &R Minor Capital Improvements $100,000 GG204 - Energy Retrofit Phase II $2,000,000 GG205 - City Facilities Roofing Renovation $325,000 GG206 - Fire Risers at City Facilities $30,000 PR212 - Outdoor Sports Court Renovation $72,000 TF338 - Replace City Street Signs (Non-Illuminated) $75,000 TF372 - Internally Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement Program - Energy Conservation Grant $100,000 Subtotal $2,952,000 Montgomery PS145 - Fire Station 5 Programming & Replacement $12,000,000 Subtotal $12,000,000 Southwest PRNew1 - Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) $800,800 PRNew2 - Rienstra Park Slope Reconstruction $300,000 27 PRNew3 - Hilltop Park Playground Replacement Subtotal Western City GG187 - Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks LB144 - Civic Center Library Improvements LB145 - S Chula Vista Library Improvements Subtotal Total $44,000 $1,144,800 $200,000 $4,500,000 $1,000,000 $5,700,000 $22,196,800 28 TABLE 3 FY 2009/10 Capital Improvement Program Summary By Funding Source FY2009-10 Proposed Project Status 22500 - Traffic Signal OP206 - Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade $2,000 On Going OP208 - CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase $5,000 On Going TF316 - Traffic Signal Installation at Second Avenue and Quintard Street $175,000 On Schedule TF331 - Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Montgomery $20,000 On Schedule TF337 - Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Program $300,000 On Going TF354 - Traffic Congestion Relief Program $5,000 On Going TF366 - Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Upgrade and Modification' Program $165,000 On Schedule TF370 - Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue $145,000 New TF371 - Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive and Main Street $250,000 New Subtotal $1,067,000 22700 - TransNet DR180 - Emergency Storm Drain Replacement $1,200,000 New OP202 - CIP Advanced Planning $77,000 On Going OP208 - CIP Mgt & Equipment Purchase $5,000 On Going STL291 - Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements $235,000 On Schedule 29 STL303 - First Ave Impvmts Palomar - Naples $20,000 Almost Complete STL304 - Glenhaven Way Amy Street Improvments $10,000 On Schedule STL305 - Oxford Street Improvents Third to Alpine $15,000 On Schedule STL323 - Pedestrian Master Plan $45,000 On Schedule STL342 - Second Avenue Improvements-Naples Street to Palomar Street $25,000 New STM354 - North Broadway Reconstruction $50,000 On Schedule $2,020,000 New $450,000 New $205,000 New $35,355 New $145,300 New $116,220 New $2,368,000 On Going STL351 - Bikeway Master Plan Update STL354 - Pavement Major Rehabilitation FY2009-10 STL355 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation FY2009-10 STL359 - Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps Construction STL360 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Palomar Street STL361 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements STL363 - Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements STM367 - South Broadway Improvements, Main Street to Southern City Limits $300,000 New TF321 - Citywide Traffic Count Program $90,000 On Going TF325 - Traffic Monitoring Program $20,000 On Going TF327 - Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program $220,000 On Going 30 TF366 - Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Upgrade and Modification Program $100,000 On Going $30,000 On Going $130,000 On Going $50,000 On Going $70,000 On Going $30,000 On Going $30,000 On Going $100,000 On Going $160,000 On Going Subtotal $8,351,875 TF332 - Signing and Striping Program TF344 - I 805 Direct Access Ramp E Hand E Palomar TF345 - Traffic Calming Program TF350 - Traffic Signal System Optimization TF354 - Traffic Congestion Relief Program TF356 - Otay Mesa Transportation System TF359 - SR54 Corridor and Arterial Operations TF362 - Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 22700 - TransNet ARRA Exchange STM366 - Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways $2,610,000 New TF330 - Traffic Signal Modification, Fourth & Main, Fourth & Beyer $450,000 On Schedule TF331 - Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Montgomery $300,000 On Schedule Subtotal $3,360,000 73654 - Smart Growth Incentive OP217 - Palomar Gateway Specific Plan $400,000 New STL361 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements $283,900 New STL362 - Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements $2,000,000 New 31 Subtotal $2,683,900 24110 - Parking Meter OP212 - Downtown Parking District Improvements $120,000 On Going Subtotal $120,000 26110 - State Library Act LB137 - Automation Advancements & Upgrade $102,644 On Going Subtotal $102,644 27221 - Public Library Federal Grant LB143 - Civic Center Library Veterans Wing $95,000 New Subtotal $95,000 27412 - Community Development Slock Grant - R STL362 - Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements $500,000 New Subtotal $500,000 33310 - CDSG STL352 - ADA Curb Ramps FY09-10 $504,922 New Subtotal $504,922 33330 - CDSG Section 108 Loan STL342 - Second Avenue Improvements-Naples Street to Palomar $100,000 New Street Subtotal $100,000 41300 - Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve SW234 - Sewer Impvts on Colorado bet J & K $777,000 On Schedule SW261 - Industrial Blvd, and Main Street Capacity Enhancement $140,000 New 32 Subtotal $917,000 41410 - Sewer Service Revenue - 41410 Subtotal $5,000 On Going $72,000 On Going $15,000 On Going $15,000 On Going $3,000 On Going $5,000 On Going $115,000 GG183 - GIS-Orthophotograhy/Topography Project GG187 - Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks OP200 - Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program OP202 - CIP Advanced Planning OP206 - Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade OP208 - CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase 42800 - Sewer Facility Replacement SW256 - Robinhood Ranch II Pump Stn Impvts $400,000 On Schedule SW260 - Sewer Rehab for FY09-10 , $300,000 New Subtotal $700,000 54220 - Telegraph Canyon Drainage DIF DR182 - Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue $950,000 New DR 183 - Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Avenue to Hilltop Drive $300,000 New Subtotal $1,250,000 59110 - Transportation Development GG183 - GIS-Orthophotograhy/Topography Project $10,000 On Going OP200 - Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program $15,000 On Going 33 OP206 - Automation - Auto CAD Upgrade OP208 - CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase STM355 - Otay Lakes Road Widening TF27 4 - Traffic Count Station and Maintenance TF325 - Traffic Monitoring Program 61110 - Merged Bayfront Towncenter I STL362 - Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements RD241 - Storefront Renovation Program 65140 - Merged Project Area OP217 - Palomar Gateway Specific Plan RD241 - Storefront Renovation Program 71533 - Otay Ranch Village 7 Neighborhood Park PR279 - All Seasons Park 72300 - Bicycle Facilities Fund (TDA) STL351 - Bikeway Master Plan Update $5,000 On Going $5,000 On Going $2,500,000 On Schedule $210,000 On Going $100,000 On Going Subtotal $2,845,000 $800,000 New Subtotal $75,000 On Going $875,000 $75,000 $75,000 New On Going Subtotal $150,000 $2,000,000 On Going Subtotal $2,000,000 $150,000 On Going STL363 - Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements $116,220 New Subtotal $266,220 34 73610 - Miscellaneous Transportation Grants STL360 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Palomar Street STM364 - Heritage Road Bridge Reconstruction Subtotal 73900 - Prop 42 Traffic Congestion Relief STL346 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation Subtotal 74100 - Prop 18 Highway Safety STL357 - Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Prop 1 B) Subtotal 73681 - Environmental Mitigation Program (Other Trans Programs) OP218 - Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area Subtotal Total for All Funds $318,015 On Schedule $315,271 On Schedule $633,286 $348,000 On Going $348,000 $3,385,407 $3,385,407 $373,048 $373,048 $30,743,302 New New 35 TABLE 3A FY2009/10 Capital Improvement Program J Funding Summary By Funding Source (UNFUNDED) 09200 - General Fund GG187 - Replacement of Fuel Tanks GG195 - C & R Minor Capital Improvements GG205 - City Facilities Roofing Renovation GG206 - Fire Risers at City Facilities PRNew1 - Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) Subtotal 22110 - Gas Tax TF338 - Replace City Street Signs (Non-Illuminated) Subtotal 26800 - State Recreation Grant PRNew3 - Hilltop Park Playground Replacement Subtotal 28568 - CEC Energy Loan Phase I TF372 - Internally Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement Program - Energy Conservation Grant Subtotal 30110 - Storm Drain Revenue DR 181 - CMP Rehabilitation and Replacement Program Subtotal FY2009-10 Proposed $200,000 $100,000 $325,000 $30,000 $100,000 $755,000 $75,000 $75,000 $44,000 $44,000 $100,000 $100,000 $250,000 $250,000 36 71510 - Park Acquisition and Development PR212 - Outdoor Sports Court Renovation $50,000 PRNew1 - Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) $500,000 PRNew2 - Rienstra Park Slope Reconstruction $100,000 Subtotal $650,000 71700 - Residential Construction Tax (RCT) PR212 - Outdoor Sports Court Renovation $22,000 PR299 - Greg Rogers Park Restroom Renovation $400,000 PRNew1 - Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) $200,800 PRNew2 - Rienstra Park Slope Reconstruction $200,000 PS145 - Fire Station 5 Programming & Replacement $12,000,000 Subtotal $12,822,800 27351 - California Public Library Modernization LB144 - Civic Center Library Remodel $4,500,000 New LB145 - South Chula Vista Library Renovations $1,000,000 New Subtotal $5,500,000 99999 - ARRA GG204 - Energy Retrofit Phase II $2,000,000 Subtotal $2,000,000 Totals $22,196,800 37 ~'!(?-aTY OF FY 2009-2010 Capital Improvement Program ,~~ CHULA VISTA Five-Year CIP Project Summary Schedule Report Project Name C~tegory Total Project FY2009,-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 Total Cost -I< DR182 Telegraph Canyon Channel Stormwater $950,000 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue DR180 Emergency Storm Drain Replacement Stormwater $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 DR183 Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Stormwater $1,000,000 $300;000 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Avenue to Hilltop Drive GG183 G I S-O rthophotog ra hyfT opogra phy Information $209,965 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Project Technologies GG187 Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks Capital Equipment $372,000 $72,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,000 LB137 Automation Advancements & Upgrade Information $335,773 $102,644 $0 $0 $0 $0 $102,644 Technologies LB143 Civic Center Library Veterans Wing Public Building $95,000 $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 Facilities OP200 Survey Monument Preservation and Other CIP $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Replacement Program OP202 CIP Advanced Planning Other CIP N/A $92,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,000 OP206 Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade Other CIP $93,696 ~1 0,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $50,000 OP208 CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase Information $180,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Technologies OP212 Downtown Parking District Improvements Redevelopment $203,000 $.120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 -- OP217 Palomar Gateway Specific Plan Redevelopment $475,000 $475,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $475,000 OP218 Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Other CIP $373,048 $37;3.048 $0 $0 $0 $0 $373,048 Central City Preserve Area PR279 All Seasons Park Public Park Facilities $2,900,000 $2,009,000 $450,541 $0 $0 $0 $2,450,541 RD241 Storefront Renovation Program Redevelopment $335,000 " $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 STL291 Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Streets and Surface $1,828,167 $235,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $235,000 Improvement , ' STL303 First Ave Impvmts Palomar - Naples Streets and Suriace $1,822,240 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 FYR 1 Category Total Project FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY20'12-13 FY2013-14 Total Cost' mprovemen STL304 Glenhaven Way Amy Slreet Improvments Streets and Surface $726,730 . $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Improvement STL305 Oxford Street Improvents Third to Alpine Slreets and Surface $165,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Improvement STL323 Pedestrian Master Plan Public Safety $256,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 STL342 Second Avenue Improvements-Naples Streets and Surface $125,000 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 Street to Palomar Street Improvement STL346 Pavement Minor Rehabilitation Streets and Surface $1,978,000 $348,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $348,000 Improvement STL351 Bikeway Masler Plan Update Streets and Surface $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Improvement STL352 ADA Curb Ramps FY09-10 , Streets and Surface $504,922 $504,922 $0 $0 $0 $0 $504,922 Improvement STL354 Pavement Major Rehabilitation FY2009- Streets and Surface $2,020,000 $2,020,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,020,000 10 Improvement STL355 Pavement Minor Rehabilitation FY2009- Streets and Surface $450,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 10 Improvement STL357 Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Prop Streets and Surface $3,385,407 . $3,385,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,385,407 1B) Improvement STL359 Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross Streets and Surface $205,000. $205,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $205,000 Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps Construction Improvement STL360 Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Streets and Surface $353,370 . $353,370 $0 $0 $0 $0 $353,370 Palomar Street Improvement STL361 Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Streets and Surface $429,200 $429,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $429,200 Improvements Improvement STL362 Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements Streets and Surface $3,300,000 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,300,000 Improvement STL363 Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Streets and Surface $232,440 $232,440 $0 $0 $0 $0 $232,440 Sidewalk Improvements Improvement FYR 2 Project Name Category Total Project FV2009-10 FV2010-11 FV2011-12 FV2012-13 FV2013_14 Total Cost * STL902 ADA Curb Ramps -- Future Years (Placeholder CDBG) N/A $0 S300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,200,000 STL999 Sidewalk Safety Pro9ram -- N/A $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 Future Years (Placeholder) STM354 North Broadway Reconstruction Streets and Suriace $3,719,722 $2,368,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,368,000 Improvement STM355 Olay Lakes Road Widening Streets and Surrace $10,900,000 $2,500,000 $0 $2,500,000 $0 $4,500,000 $9,500,000 Improvement STM364 Heritage Road Bridge Reconstruction Streets and Surrace $2,494,089' , $315,271 $0 $0 $0 $0 S315,271 Improvement STM366 Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Streets and Surface $2,610,000 $2,610,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,610,000 Highways Improvement " STM367 South Broadway Improvements, Main Streets and Surrace $2,200,000 $300,000 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 Street to Southern City Limits Improvement STM999 Pavement Rehabilitation - Future Years Streets and Surface N/A $0 $4,400,000 $4,400,000 $4,400,000 $4,400,000 $17,600,000 (Placeholder) Improvement SW234 Sewer Impvts on Colorado bet J & K Sewer $978,529 $777,000 $0 SO $0 $0 $777,000 SW256 Robinhood Ranch II Pump SIn Impvts Sewer $450,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 SW260 Sewer Rehab for FV09-1 0 Sewer $300,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 SW261 Industrial Blvd, and Main Street Capacity Sewer $140,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 Enhancement SW999 Sewer Rehab Future Years N/A . $0 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,200,000 (Placeholder) SW998 Sewer Access Rd Maintenance Program - Sewer N/A SO $50,000 $100,000 $100,000 S100,000 S350,000 Future Years (Placeholder) -- TF274 Traffic Count Station and Maintenance Traffic N/A ,S210,OOO $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $0 $330,000 TF316 Traffic Si9nallnstallation at Second Traffic $375,000 $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Avenue and Quintard Street TF321 Citywide Traffic Count Program Traffic N/A $90~000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $240,000 TF325 Traffic Monitoring Program Traffic N/A $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $0 $480,000 TF327 Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Public Safety N/A $220,000 $230,000 $230,000 $230,000 $0 $910,000 Safety Pro9ram FYR 3 Project Name Category Total Project FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 Total Cost~ Traffic Signal Modification, Fourth & Traffic $777,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 Main, Fourth & Beyer TF331 Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Traffic $690,000 $320,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $320,000 Montgomery TF332 Signing and Striping Program Streets and Surface N/A $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $400,000 Improvement TF337 Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Traffic N/A , $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $1,200,000 Program TF344 I 805 Direct Access Ramp E Hand E Highway Facilities $205,000 ' $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 Palomar TF345 Traffic Calming Program Traffic N/A $130,000 $200,000 $240,000 $270,000 $0 $840,000 TF350 Traffic Signal System Optimization Traffic $500,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $200,000 TF354 Traffic Congestion Relief Program Traffic N/A $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $0 $300,000 TF356 Otay Mesa Transportation System Traffic $150,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 TF359 SR54 Corridor and Arterial Operations Highway Facilities $150,000: $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 TF362 Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 Traffic $402,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 TF366 Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Traffic N/A $325,000 $325,000 $260,000 $260,000 $0 $1,170,000 Upgrade and Modification Program TF370 Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Traffic $350,000 $145,000 $205,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Avenue and Orange Avenue TF371 Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive Traffic $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 and Main Street TF999 Western TDIF Program - Future Years Traffic N/A $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 (Placeholder) Total $54,375,298 $30,743,302 $10,095,541 $9,365,000 $6,805,000 $9,810,000 $66,818,843 *projects with N/A are annual projects, and therefore do not have a fixed project cost FYR4 .$}\{~ ClTYOF FY 2009-2010 Proposed Capital Improvement Program ~l::c::::- CHUlA VISTA Five-Year CIP Project Summary Schedule Report (UNFUNDED) Project Name Category Total Project FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013'14 Total Cost ** DR181 CMP Rehabilitation and Replacement Storm water N/A $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 Program GG187' Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks Capital Equipment $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 GG195 C & R Minor Capital Improvements Facilities N/A - $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000 Management GG204' Ener9Y Retrofit Phase II Public Building $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Facilities GG205 City Facilities Roofing Renovation Public Building $325,000 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 Facilities GG206 Fire Risers at City F aeilities Public Building $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Facilities LB144 Civic Center Library Remodel Public Building $4,500,000 - $4,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,500,000 Facilities LB145 South Chula Vista Library Renovations Public Building $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Facilities PR212 Outdoor Sports Court Renovation Public Park $303,150 _ _ '$72,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,000 Facilities PR299 Greg Rogers Park Restroom Public Park $450,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 Renovation Facilities PRNew1 Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) Public Park $800,800 $800,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,800 Facilities PRNew2 Rienstra Park Slope Reconstruction Public Park $300,000 - $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Facilities PRNew3 Hilltop Park Playground Replacement Public Park $44,000 ' $44,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,000 Facilities PRNew4 Bayfront Park Improvements Public Park $6,680,000 $0 $0 $6,680,000 $0 $0 $6,680,000 Facilities PS145 Fire Station 5 Programming & Public Safety $12,055,815 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000,000 Replacement PSNew Bayfront Fire Station Public Safety $12,000,000 -$0 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $12,000,000 SWNew Sewer Lift Station - Bayfront Sewer $12,400,000 $0 $12,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $12,400,000 FYR(UF) 1 Project Name Category Total Project FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013c14. Total Cost *" TF372' Internally Illuminated Street Name Sign Traffic $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Replacement Program - Energy Conservation Grant TF338 Replace City Street Signs (Non- Streets and $335,000 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Illuminated) Surface Improvement Total $55,623,765 $22,196,800 $26,850,000 $7,030,000 $350,000 $350,000 $56,776,800 'Project anticipated to be funded during FY10 mid-year at which time staff will return to Council for appropriation **?rojects with N/A are annual projects, and therefore do not have a fixed project cost FYR(UF) 2 -.'}\{t- (IWOF "f!~:5 CHUlA VISTA FY2009-2010 Capita/Improvement Program Five-Year CIP Summary by Fund FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total Fund Name: Bicycle Facilitie,s Fund (TDA) Fund Number: 72300 Description: . This funds provides support for the region's non-motorized transportation projects including sidewalk and bicycle lane improvements. The revenue comes from 1/4% of the total sales tax assessed in the region. STL351 Bikeway Master Plan Update $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 STL363 Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements $116,220 $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,220 STL999 Sidewalk Safety Program - Future Years (placeholder) $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 Total Uses of Funds $266,220 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $666,220 IFun~~ame: CDBG, Fund Number: 33310 Description: Community Development Block Grant Funds STL352 ADA Curb Ramps FY09-10 $504,922 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 $504,922 $1,200,000 STL902 ADA Curb Ramps Future Years (Placeholder) Total Uses of Funds $300,000 $504,922 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,704,922 IFund Name: Fund Number: 'CDBG,Section 108 Loan 33330 Description: Community Development Block Grant Funds - Section 108 Loan STL342 Second Avenue Improvements- $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 FYF 1 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year TDtal Naples Street tD Palomar Street TDtal Uses Df Funds $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Fund Name: Miscellaneous Transportation Grants Fund Number: 73610 Description: Federal and State Transportation Grants STM364 Heritage Road Bridge $315,271 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,271 Reconstruction STL360 Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L $318,015 $0 $0 $0 $0 $318,015 Street to Palomar Street Total Uses of Funds $633,286 $0 $0 $0 $0 $633,286 Fund Name: Otay Ranch.Village 7 Neighborhood Park Fund Number: 71533 Description: Park Acquisition and Development Funds received for Otay Ranch Village 7 Neighborhood Park PR279 All Seasons Park $2,000,000 $450,541 $0 $0 $0 $2,450,541 Totai Uses of Funds $2,000,000 $450,541 $0 $0 $0 $2,450,541 IFund Name: . Parking Mete: Fund Number: 24110 Description: Revenues generated from Parking Meter OP212 Downtown Parking District $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 Improvements Total Uses of Funds $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 !FundName: prDp1 B Highway Safety Fund Number: 74100 o Description: In 2006-07, the voters of the state approved Proposition 1 B. This proposition included funds to be provided to cities within the state for local roadway FYF 2 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total improvements. STL357 Pavement Rehabilitation $3,385,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,385,407 Program (Prop 1 B) Total Uses of Funds $3,385,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,385,407 Fund Name: Prop 42 Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Number: 73900 Description: Assembly Bill 2928 (Chapter 91, Statues of 2000), as amended by Senate Bill 1662 (Chapter 656, Statues of 2000), established the Traffic Congestion Relief in the State Treasury for allocating to cities and counties for street or road maintenance or reconstruction. STL346 Pavement Minor Rehabilitation $348,000 $348,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $348,000 $348,000 Total Uses of Funds Fund,Name: Public LibraryFed~ral Earmark Fund Number: 27221 Description: Public Library. Funds via Filner's Office LB143 Civic Center Library Veterans Wing $95,000 IFun~N~me: Fund Number: ',... $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 I Total Uses of Funds $95,000 CDBG , R 27412 Description: Community Development Block Grant'- ARRA . STL362 Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 Total Uses of Funds $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 IFund Name: Southwest Project Area , Fund Number: 61110 Description: Southwest Project Area (Tax Allocation Bond) RD241 Storefront Renovation Program $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 FYF 3 STL362 Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements FY2009-10 $800,000 FY2010-11 $0 FY2011-12 $0 FY2012-13 $0 FY2013-14 $0 5 Year Total $800,000 Total Uses of Funds $875,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $875,000 Fund,Name: ' Meiged:Redeiielopment Agency Project Fund Number: 65140 Description: Merged RDA Project (Tax Increment) OP217 RD241 Palomar Gateway Specific Storefront Renovation Program $75,000 $75,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 $150,000 Total Uses of Funds Sewer 'F acj I ity: R,ep lagement , , I IFund,Name: Fund Number: 42800 Description: Revenues in the Sewer Facilities Replacement fund are derived from Sewer Facilities Replacement Fees paid on a monthly basis by all users connected to the City's wastewater collection system. SW260 Sewer Rehab for FY09-10 $300,000 $0 SW999 Sewer Rehab Future Years $0 $300,000 (Placeholder) SW256 Robinhood Ranch II Pump Stn $400,000 $0 Impvts Total Uses of Funds $700,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $300,000 5300,000 $300,000 $1,900,000 - ,.,", ,-,. I ',' 'SewerService ~Revenue - "4141,0 IFunct-Name: Fund Number: 41410 Description: Revenues in the Sewer Service Revenue Fund are derived from monthly Sewer Service Charges paid by all users connected to the City's wastewater collection system. FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total OP202 CIP Advanced Planning $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 GG187 Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks $72,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,000 OP208 CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 OP206 Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $15,000 Total Uses of Funds $115,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $127,000 IfU~~ ~.~,m<~:!, '" "-fSmart Gro~th,lncent~ve '. , . ,. . .. Fund Number: 73654 Description: This innovative pilot program is based on the SANDAG Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) - using funding incentives to encourage coordinated regional planning to bring transit service, housing, and employment together in smart growth development. STL361 Industrial Blvd, Bike Lane and $283,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $283,900 Pedestrian Improvements STL362 Third Avenue Streetscape $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 Improvements OP217 Palomar Gateway Specific $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 Total Uses of Funds $2,683,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,683,900 !Fund N~me: State Library Act Fund Number: 26110 Description: The Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) is a federal grant program administered in California by the State Librarian. Each year the State Librarian awards grants on a competitive basis unless announced otherwise. LB137 Automation Advancements & Upgrade $102,644 $0 $0 $0 $0 $102,644 Total Uses of Funds $102,644 $0 $0 $0 $0 $102,644 Fund Name: 'Telegraph Canyon Drainage DIF FYF 5 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total Fund Number: 54220 Description: Development Impact Funds for Telegraph Canyon Drainage DR182 Telegraph Canyon Channel $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue DR183 Telegraph Canyon Drainage $300,000 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Study, First Avenue to Hilltop Drive Total Uses of Funds $1,250,000 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,950,000 I Fundt;lame: Fund Number: Traffic Signal 22500 Description: On DB/OBI78, the City Council established Council Policy No. 47B-01 requiring private developers to participate In the financing andlor installation of traffic signals (inlcuding but not limited to design, construction, inspection, modification, striping, etc) on public streets within the City of Chula Vista. The fee collected (as designated in the Master Fee Schedule) are to be utilized for such purpose. TF370 Traffic Signal Installation at $145,000 $205,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue TF371 Traffic Si9nal Modification at $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Hilltop Drive and Main Street TF366 Traffic Signal and Streetlight $165,000 $200,000 $200.000 $200,000 $0 $765,000 Systems Upgrade and Modification Program OP208 CIP Mgmt & Equipment $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Purchase TF354 Traffic Congestion Relief $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Program TF316 Traffic Signal Installation at $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Second Avenue and Quintard Street TF337 Traffic Signal Left Turn $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $1.200,000 FYF 6 Modification Program TF331 Traffic Signal Modification, $20,000 $0 $0 $0 Third and Montgomery OP206 Automation - AutoCAD $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Upgrade Totat Uses of Funds $1,067,000 $707,000 $502,000 $502,000 FY2009-10 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total FY2010-11 $0 $20,000 $2,000 $10,000 $2,000 $2,780,000 TransNet -[ IFundName: . Fund Number: 22700 Description: In the late 1980's, San Diego County voters approved Prop A, which incresed the local sales tax by 1/2% in order to provide funds for needed transportation projects_ This Local Transportation Tax is now known as TransNet. Initially it went into effect on July 1, 1988 and generated for twenty years. It has recently been renewed. DR180 Emergency Storm Drain Replacement STL291 Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements STL303 First Ave Impvmts Palomar- Naples STL304 Glenhaven Way Amy Street Improvments STL305 Oxford Street Improvents Third to Alpine STL351 Bikeway Master Plan Update STM367 South Broadway Improvements, Main Street to Southern City Limits STL323 Pedestrian Master Plan TF366 Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Upgrade and Modification Program STL359 Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $235,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $235,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $300,000 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $160,000 $125,000 $60,000 $405,000 $60,000 $205,000 $0 $0 $0 $205,000 $0 FYF 7 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total STL360 Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L $35,355 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,355 Street to Palomar Street STL361 Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and $145,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,300 Pedestrian Improvements STL363 Sidewalk Safety Program - I $116,220 $0 $0 $0 $116,220 Street Sidewalk Improvements OP202 CIP Advanced Planning $77,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,000 OP208 CIP Mgmt & Equipment $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Purchase STL355 Pavement Minor Rehabilitation $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 FY2009-10 STL354 Pavement Major Rehabilitation $2,020,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,020,000 FY2009-10 STL342 Second Avenue Improvements- $25.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Naples Street to Palomar Street STM354 North Broadway $2,368,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,368,000 Reconstruction TF332 Signing and Striping Program $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $400,000 TF344 I 805 Direct Access Ramp E H $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 and E Palomar TF350 Traffic Signal System $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $200,000 Optimization TF354 Traffic Congestion Relief $70,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $0 $295,000 Program TF356 Otay Mesa Transportation $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 System TF359 SR54 Corridor and Arterial $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 Operations TF362 Kids Walk and Bike to School $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Phase 2 FYF 8 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total TF321 Citywide Traffic Count Program $90,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $240,000 TF325 T raffle Monitoring Program $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $80,000 TF327 Neighborhood Traffic and $220,000 $230,000 $230,000 $230,000 $0 $910,000 Pedestrian Safety Program TF345 Traffic Calming Program $130,000 $200,000 $240,000 $270,000 $0 $840,000 Total Uses of Funds $8,351,875 $2,840,000 $915,000 $855,000 $0 $12,961,875 !FundName: TransNet ARRA Exchange - ,- Fund Number: 22700 Description: TransNet American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) Exchange TF330 Traffic Signal Modification, $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 Fourth & Main, Fourth & Beyer TF331 Traffic Signal Modification, $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Third and Montgomery STM366 Pavement Rehabilitation for $2,610,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,610,000 Federal-Aid Highways Total Uses of Funds $3,360,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,360,000 Fund Name: Enviropmental Mitigation Program Fund Number: 73681 Description: The TransNet Extension Ordinance and Expenditure Plan, approved countywide by voters in November 2004, includes an Environmental Mitigation Program (EMP) which is a funding allocation category for the costs to mitigate habitat impacts for regional transportation projects. The EMP is a unique component of the TransNet Extension in that it goes beyond traditional mitigation for transportation projects by including a funding allocation for habitat acquisition, management, and monitoring activities as needed to help implement the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) and the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP). This funding allocation is tied to mitigation requirements and the environmental clearance approval process for projects outlined in the Regional Transportation Plan (MOBILITY 2030). OP218 Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area $373,048 $0 $0 $0 $0 $373,048 Total Uses of Funds $373,048 $0 $0 $0 $0 $373,048 FYF 9 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total I Fund .Name: Fund Number: Transp,ortation De~elopment 59110 Description: In the late 1980's, City Council established various Development Impact Fees to mitigate the financial burden created by developers of land. The Transportation Development Impact Fee is one of those fees used for construction of transportation facilities in the eastern territories (including but not limited to construction, equipment, etc.). STM355 Otay Lakes Road Widening $2,500,000 $0 $2.500,000 $0 $4,500,000 $9.500,000 GG183 GIS- $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Orthophotog rahyrr opography OP208 CIP Mgmt & Equipment $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5.000 Purchase OP200 Survey Monument $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Preservation and Replacement Program TF27 4 Traffic Count Station and $210,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $0 $330.000 Maintenance TF325 Traffic Monitoring Program $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100.000 $0 $400.000 OP206 Automation - AutoCAD $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5.000 $5,000 $25,000 Upgrade Total Uses of Funds $2.845.000 $145,000 $2,645,000 $145,000 $4,505,000 $10,285,000 IFundName: Trunk SeY(er'Cap_Re~erve' - ,I '<,. - Fund Number: 41300 Description: Revenues in the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve are derived from Sewer Capacity Charges. FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total SW261 Industrial Blvd. and Main Street $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 Capacity Enhancement SW234 Sewer lmpvts on Colorado bet $777,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $777,000 J&K Total Uses of Funds $917,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $917,000 r Yr IV Total of ALL Funds FY2009-10 . $30,743,302 FY2010-11 $5,545,541 FY2011-12 $4,765,000 FY2012-13 $2,205,000 FY2013-14 $5,210,000 5 Year Total $47,968,843 FYF 11 DRAFT PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORTS The following pages, which make up the bulk of the document, contain descriptions of all projects that are being funded as part of this budget. These descriptions include the Location, Responsible Department, Intent, Justification and Funding Allocation. 38 ~11t- CITY OF ~i' [HUlA VISTA Project Location: Citywide Department Responsible: Public Works City of Chula Vista 2009/1 0.2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report , Project Intents: Project Description: Replacement Emergency replacement of failed storm drains, primarily corrugated metal pipe (CrvIP) failures, throughout the City. :"'1 h\stiIication: Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost $0 Emergency repairs must be undertaken to protect life and prapeliy. Project Type: Drainage Total Estimated Cost $1,200,000 39 ~\l/?- CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009110-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: ilK" Street 10 First Avenue ;,!I'~:~> ;~=<:, /1" '; + Engineering Project Intents: Project Description: Upgrade Construction of Dual Reinforced Concrete Culvert between K Street and First Avenue in order to ultimately convey the 100~year FEMA flood. This project will be constructed in cooperation with St. John's School, which is responsible to construct one oflhe t\vo culverts required. The City will pay the incremental costs of constructing the second culvert. .~::.: ,_,.-;.,>;1':: -.......--- ~~:-:.;"~/ -;.'; ;';'-\"""" ~('i,. " \'. 1, \'("~. _- -: \ 'i'. Justification: 51. John's School proposes the enclosure of the existing open channel and is obligated to COilstruct a single underground box culvert. However, t\'.fO culverts are required to ultimately convey the IOO-year FEr..'IA flood without road\.vay and propcI1y flooding. City staff has determined that it is cost-effective and in the City's best interests to construct the second culvert now in order to take advantage of reduced construction costs, when compared to constructing the second culvert as a "stand alone" project. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Drainage Total Estimated Cost $950,000 F\'2013-14 $0 40 :$Wc- CITY 01' '~CHUlAVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: First t\ venue to Hilltop Drive + Engineering >,''-' Upgrade Construction of a naturalized channel within, and immediately downstream of, Hilltop Park needed to stabilize the channel and,~o provide for more natural surface water infiltration through the park. The channel will be planted with appropriate plant materials, while maintaining recreational opportunities within the park. "';.~ Justification: Hilltop Park.has a low-flow concrete channel that was designed to primarily convey nuisance runoff through the park and reduce erosion Dfthe channel bottom. During high-flow storm events, the low~l1ow channel is not adequate to convey runoff and the adjacent earthen sides of the channel erodes. The proposed project would remove the low-now channel, and replace it with an open-celled, vegetated system that would increase infiltration and reduce pollutant transport to downstream receiving waters. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Drainage Total Estimated Cost: $J ,000,000 41 ~\If::.. CITY OF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Information Technology Services Upgrade City purchased software package called IStreet View in 2005. In FY 06, the City purchased 6 inch orthophotography of the City, supplemented vdth two foot contours. Tbis photography will be utilized to update the City's Geographical Information System and is utilized by almost all City departments. Project Location: Citywide Department Responsible: Justification: Orthophotography requires intermittent updates. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: General Government Total Estimated Cost: $209,965 Fund No FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 22110 Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 71700 Residential Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Tax (RCT) 42800 Sewer Facility $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Replacement 73300 Sewer Facility $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Replacement - 73300 41410 Sewer Service Revenue- $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 41410 40300 Transit Capital Projects $0 $0 $0 SO $0 59110 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 42 ::.,\;'\\ 1(.. CITY OF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Replacement This project involves installation of two 10,000 gallon abovc.ground fuel tanks (Llnleaded & diesel) at the PWc. He Project Location: 1800 Maxwell Road Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Public \Vorlcs Justification: 'There is only 1,500 gallon tank of diesel fuel currently available at the PWC. As a result, PW crevvs need to fuel aif-site at Fire Stations 2 & 7. Adding these tanks will allow crews to be more effective and efficient. Tanks are also required to help ensure an adequate fuel supply in case of emergencies. Estimated Operation and tvlaintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: General Government Total Estimated Cost:' $572,000 FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 Pending ARRA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 09200 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 41410 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 43 ;::;,0"IIf::.. CITY OF ~CHUlAVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Library Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Citywide Service Extension This project would aHaw upgrades to all aspects of the Library's internal systems, including inventory management, check out and return of materials, website management and implementation, automated communication with customers, etc. Project items may include, but will not be limited to, a radio frequency identification control system, upgraded materials check-out and check~in systems, automated Library sorting systems, digital customer information screens, etc. In addition to the inventory and check-out/return features, the system will also allow the library to initiate a self~checkout system. La"tly, the system also will automate the Library's sorting system. Justitication: The ability of libraries to meet public service demands regarding tracking and availability of materials as well as achieving efficiency and effectiveness goals depends on keeping the internal systems that support inventory management and customer communication. Estimated Operation and !vlaintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Library Total Estimated Cost: $335,773 44 ~\It::. CITY OF ~ CHULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Library Project Location: 365 F Street Project Intents: Project Description: Renovaticm Funds to acquire books, upgrade computers and technology, and/or establish education and outreach programs Justification: Per the FY2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act (P.L. 111-8) Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Library Total Estimated Cost: $95,000 FY21110-11 $0 45 ~{I?- CITY OF ~1:tff (HULA VI~A City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide .,::': Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering Renovation and Replacement The scope ofwark includes performing surveys to preserve & dCllsify the Citys Horizontal-Vertical Control network to the California Coordinate System Zone G. Numerous control monuments exist throughout the City at a l.mile and Yt mile spacing for the Horizontal-Vertical Control Network. Additionally, survey monuments are preserved fur the Citys Right of Way. Justification: The Professional Land Surveyors Act S 8771 requires that existing survey monuments shall be located and referenced and a Corner Record or Record of Survcy of the references shall be filed with the County Surveyor. The monuments are used to perform various surveys that include Subdivision/Parcel Maps, Record of Surveys, Corner Records, and Improvement Plans. Because these survey monuments provide the basis for re-tracing historical boundaries, as well as establishing new subdivisions, these survey monuments must be perpetuated and augmented in order to accurately define property boundaries and rights- of-way. These survey monuments will be made available via the City's Internet site and will benefit the City Capitallmprovcment Program and private development Estimated Operation and l\/Iaintcnance Cost: $0 Project Type: Other Projects Total Estimatcd Cost: $30,000 Fund No Fund Name Sewer Service Revenue - 41410 1'\'2008-09 SO 1'\'2011-12 $0 41410 59110 $0 $0 SO $0 46 ~\IIf:. CITY OF "~l~':l (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Service Extension Project Location: Department Responsible: Citywide Engineering Performance of varia LIS studies and projects by City. staff, including the Infrastructure Deficiency Database, recycled and potable water planning, infrastructure planning and engineering work related to the application for funds. Justification: Such projects are necessary in order for the City to be able to plan the construction and rehabilitation of its infrastructure in a cost-effective manner. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Other Projects Total Estimated Cost: $897,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 22t to Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 71700 Residential Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Tax (RCT) 414tO Sewer Service Revenue - $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 41410 29200 Special Sewer $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 41200 Special Sewer - 41200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 22700 TransNet $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 29300 Trunk Sewer Capital $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Reserve 47 -01i~ CITY OF ~CHULAVlsrA City of ChuJa Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: , Department Responsible: Public \\'orks ,-,. -' , Project Intents: Upgrade ,;i Project Description: Upgrade of existing AutoCAD system. " , . .1' '''''.;,_7_.~>==-,o " " Justification: The AutoCAD software is utilized by the City's Design Engineers and Survey division in Engineering. This program is vital to the divisions operations as it is the software with which plans/plots are created, calculated, ete for all capital improvement projects. The upgrade will increase the usage and efficiency of the program as technology is everchanging. Estimated Operation and $0 Project Type: l Other Projects Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $93,696 Fund No Fund Name FY2010-11. FY2011-12 FY20l2-13 FY2013-14 22[]o Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 41410 Sewer Service Revenue- $0 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 41410 29200 Special Sewer $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 41200 Special Sewer. 41200 N/A $0 $0 $0 $0 22500 Traffic Signal $0 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 59110 Transportation $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Development 48 911;;.. eln' OF ~ CHULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide ~~ 0A ..,~~ Department Responsible: Public Works -~-,= "-"\ -"-"-"- c-'t(-- -~~' .~ ' ["'___ - I , ~ , Project Intents: Service Extension ::UT.; , k,.,'. "r. 0 This project will provide for a comprehensive elP T'\'lanagcment (including equipment) Program for Citywide Capital i'~',"~'~' . '- ~. Project Description: i.~I~.~~ :'(~!; Improvement Projects. .titln;'V\'!I); i -: - J : ~~:::;:;~u: '-""".""".'.~:?: Justification: Existing elP rep011ing document and database is limited in capabilities and in need of extensive updating and/or rebuilding to meet the growth and storage of the City's entire elP program data. The Independent Financial Review in the Spring of 2007 noted some deficiencies with the City's published CII' budget. The lack of coordinated automated. systems contributes to this deficiency. Additional funding will allow for needed assessment and licenses. Estimated Operation and S14,000 Project Type: I Other Prujects Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: S180,000 Fund No Fund N~lInc FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY20 12-13 FY21113-14 41410 Sewer Service Revenue- S30,000 SO SO SO SO 41410 41200 Special Sewer - 41200 N/A SO SO SO SO 22500 Traffic Signal S30,000 SO SO SO SO 22700 TransNet S30,000 SO SO SO SO 59110 S30,000 SO SO $0 $0 49 , ~ CITY OF 't,,~.3' (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: .' \'i \',"i,::l- _." .<.'~ Department Responsible: Redevelopment and Housing Authority .\ Project Intents: Renovation and Replacement \ \.1 ' , \ ," Project Description: This project \"ill provide for improvements within the Downtown Parking District, including resurfacing of parking lots, It ~"'." '. :'J lighting, signage, landscaping, etc. \ , .- ""\ \ Justitication: Revenues generated from the Parking District need to be utilized for improvements to the District. There has been significant deferred maintenance in the District, specifically in the public parking lot and equipment utilized in the District. Estimated Operation and $0 Project Type: Other Projects Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $203,000 Fund No Fund Name Parking Meter 24110 50 ~Wf:. CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Justification: Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report The Palomar Gateway Oistrict is located at the southwest quadrant of the City ofChuJa Vista. Planning and Building Revitalization The project is the preparation of a Specific Plan for the lOQ.acrc Palomar Gateway District (POD) - the major southern gateway within western Chula Vista. The primary goal of the Specific Plan is to implement the General Plan Smart Growth vision for a higher-density, pedestrian and transit-oriented development area with a mix of shops and office near the transit station, by providing the necessary zoning and regulatory framework, consistent with the General Plan. The project scope includes an extensive Public Participation program to ensure involvement from the community throughout the entire process and crafting a plan that.contains: clear/concise zoning designations and regulations to guide fut\lfe development within the District, including design guidelines for private propeliy and the public realm; a multi-modal mobility plan; infrastructure and phasing plan; market and fiscal analysis; and an implementation and administrative plan, in accordance with Slate law. The result will be a plan that is reflective of the community's vision as a unique place. The PGD Specific Pla.n will be prepared primarily by City staff with some assistance from consultants. '\\' ",\y::\- " .. ,\,\ ", ,<I .~Jr ~i~ ,-. ~'::;''::::..",:-,-" "" \\ .tra The district is characterized by containing a low-'intensity, mixed use development. Some sectors of the district are characterized by an unplanned mixture of incompatible uscs that create land use frictions and hinder the ma'Ximum development potential of the area. The irregular land use pattern throughout the PGD has created a condition characterized by a lack of community integrity, which makes the area vulnerable to economic and physical deterioration. ln order to fully realize the transformation of the district, however, it will be necessary to engage in a Spccinc Planning process to update the antiquated zoning code to reflect the smart growth vision prescribed by the General Plan. The objective of this project is to develop the planning regulation and design guidance necessary to support and effectuate the transformation ofthe PGD into a vibrant/iconic Smart Growth Community Center. In Dreier to further implement this vision, the City will produce a regulatory document that will provide the regulatory framework for intensification through the creation of a PGD Specific Plan, and maximize the benefit provided by the Palomar Gateway Enhancement Grant which involves multi-millions of dollars of infrastructure improvements to the main transpOltation/transit corridor in the project area. These infrastructure improvements have removed a barrier to redevelopment and provide an incentive to attract new development in the District. Completing the Specific Plan will fUliher speed the implemeJltation of the General Plan vision. $0 I Project Type: I Other Projects $475,000 51 ~\\I~ (In' OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report FY2010-11 FY201l-12 FY20J2-13 FY2013-14 61110 Merged Bayfront $0 $0 $0 $0 Towncenter 1 73654 Smart Growth Incentive $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Program 52 ~\If::. CllY OF ~ CHULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Central City Department Responsible: Planning and Building Project Intents: Renovation Project Description: Restoration of the Cactus Wren Habitat in the Central portion afthe City. Project involves clean up and restoration of physical Cactus Wren Habitat area within Chula Vista's Central City :r-vlultiple Species Conservation Program (i'dSCP) Preserve. Activities include site preparations, herbacide treatments, cactus planting, maintenance, monitoring and reporting over a five-year period. Justification: City awarded a grant through SANDAG under the TransNet environmental mitigation program. Estimated Operation and $0 Project Type: I Other Projects l'vlaintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $373,048 53 ~'(~ CITY OF '!~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location. Otay Ranch Village 7, Magdalena A venue Department Responsible: Recreation Project lntents: Service Extension Project Description: The scope of work includes but is not limited to the following: Design and construct for the City a fully functional 7.9-acre park as outlined in the" All Seasons Park, Approved i\'laster Plan", dated February 10,2004 (Master Plan), The park shall include, but not be limited to all components descrihed in the Master Plan. The Project is located in the Otay Ranch Village 7 neighborhood, located on Magdalena Avenue in the City of Chula Vista. Justification: The City Council previously approved by Resolution No. 2006~294 the rvlaster Plan for All Seasons Park, which conceptually designed and provided for the construction of a completed and fully functional 7.6.acre park. On June 17,2003 the Council approved a resolution establishing a Design-Build Priority List excluding fire facilities to be used in awarding Design-Build contracts for future City projects. On February 28, 2007 an RFP (Request for Proposal) was issued to all of the Design-Build firms on the Priority List to prepare proposals for the design and construction ofa completed and fully functional 7.6-acre park, All Seasons Park. Estimated total project cost is $2.51\'1. Council approved a Design Build agreement in May 15,2007. Staff will return to Council at a future date to establish the Gross l\-Jaximum Price fGlvlP) for the project. Estimated Operation and $85,000 Project Type: I Park and Recreation Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $2,900,000 54 ,$\\ If::. CITY OF ~ CHUUlW;fA City of Ch ula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location, . '\\V~,C;:; "C:, " Depatiment Responsible: Redevelopment and Housing Authority \ , Project Intents: Revitalization ' , \ ',\. . " , , , ~' Project Description: The Storefront Renovation Program (SRP) was created to revitalize the downtown area, increase property values and ; 'I ":,,,,' \ ,....... lease rates; increase business and leisure visits: and expand investment opportunities. The requested funds will be used \ for lighting and facade improvements, replacement doors, signage, and landscaping. + -\ ' \ ; Justification: This project is important to the revitalization of the western portion of the City. Estimated Operation and $0 Project Type: I Redevelopment, Ivlaintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $335,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY201l-12 FY2012-J3 FY2013-14 6]] 10 ~]erged Bayfront $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Towncenter 1 65140 Ivlerged Redevelopment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Agency 55 ~\~(f::.. On'OF ~CHULA.VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Sidewalk improvements along Fourth Avenue, between L Street and Orange Avenue. Project Location: Fourth Avenue, between L Street and Orange Avenue Depaliment Responsible: Public Works Justification: The proposed sidewalk improvements are necessary for adequate pedestrian circulation and safety along fourth Avenue. The City currently is in the process of completing the undergrounding of overhead utilities and installation of street lights along this roadway subject area. Upon completion of under grounding and streetlight installation, the sidewalk and street widening work will proceed. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $1,828,167 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 33310 CDBO $0 $0 22110 Gas Tax $0 $0 22700 TransNet $0 $0 56 ~ II{::. CITY OF ~ CHULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: first A venue -' ",,,,,,,~, ' Department Responsible: Engineering " .- " ''', ';.0>-',""'_'<', " ...",." . . . Project Intents: Revitalization :" ~ :, ". ,. '':\' \ <:>11"'"'.' "".' ..~"",::,. .:'- Project Description: This project entails full street and sidewalk improvements as part of the Western Chula Vista Infrastructure Improvement , .' . . " ,. Program, Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program. ;\ .i'''~'':~'!' \ ,^" , ..>:- (,\ . ". . I~ .~. Justification: The residents of this block have indicated a willingness to form a special assessment distict. Upon formation of the district, funds will be appropriated to construct the improvements Estimated Operation and $0 I Project Type: Local Streets Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $1,822,240 57 ~\II,~. (Ill' OF '~f~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Engineering Project Location: Glenhaven Way and Amy Street, west of First Avenue. Project In1ents: Project Description: Upgrade This project entails full street and sidewalk improvcinents as part of the Western Chula Vista Infrastructure.Improvement Program, Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program. ) 1 Justification: Glenhaven \Vay and Amy Street do not have sidewalks and the existing roadway is substandard. Under the Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program, the property owners petitioned, and City Council had formed, an assessment district for the construction of full street improvements, with the property owners paying for the costs of driveway aprons and the relocation of private improvements. All other project costs are being paid through funds obtained through a I-IUD Section 108 Loan_ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $726,730 33330 22700 58 ~,I{t-. CITY OF ~ CHUI.AVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report This project entails full street and sidewalk improvements as part of the Western Chula Vista infrastructure Improvement Program, Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program. Project Location: Oxford Street, Third A venue to Alpine A venue Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering Upgrade Justification: Oxford Street, between Third Avenue and Alpine Avenue does not have sidewalks, except along one parcel at Third Avenue and Oxford Street, and the existing roadway is substandard. Under the Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program, the property owners have submitted a petition requesting that the City Council form an assessment district [or the construction of full street improvements, with the property owners paying for the costs of driveway aprons and the relocation of private improvements. All other project costs are being paid through funds obtained through a I-IUD Section 108 Loan. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $165,000 59 ~II?- ClTYOF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide ~. ~, Depaliment Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering Revital ization The Pedestrian Master Plan (PMP) will identify missing pedestrian improvements, establish priorities and program capital improvements projects that will increase connectivity among existing facilities. Justification: The PMP will promote safer and more enjoyable environments for pedestrians by detecting areas where missing street improvements could improve environments for pedestrians. The completion of recommended improvements will include links 10 regional bikeways and public transit. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $256,000 72300 Bicycle Facilities Fund (TDAJ 22700 TransNet 60 ::jIlt.- CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Renovation and Replacement This Project entails full street and sidewalk improvements as part of Western Chula Vista infrastructure Improvements Program, Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program. ..,.... Project Location: Second Avenue, Naples Street tp Palomar Street Public \Varks + Department Responsible: Justification: Second Avenue, between Naples Street and Palomar Street does not have sidewalks and the existing roadway is substandard. Under the Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program, the property owners have submitted a preliminary petition requesting that the City Council form an assessment district for the construction of full street improvements, with the propeliy owners paying for the costs of driveway aprons and the relocation of private improvements. All other project costs are being paid through funds obtained through a HUD Section 108 Loan. Estimated Operation and rvlaintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $125,000 61 :)}~/f:. CITY OF ~;d CHULA VlSTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide ;;:1 Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering Renovation and Replacement This project will provide for an on-going program of pavement preservation and may include chip seals, slurry (REAS) seals and thin overlays (less than one~inch thick). Justification: Preventative maintenance and preservation of existing pavement is necessary to cost effectively extend its life and avoid further deterioration of the pavement and base material. Estimated Operation and l\Iaintcnance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $1,978,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-H 27341 C1WMB - Recycled $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rubber Grant 73900 Prop 42 Traffic $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Congestion Relief 62 ~II{:: CITY OF .~ CHULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide Upgrade Update existing Bikeway Master Plan adopted in 2005 to determine current facility needs [or bicyclists, update previous recommendations and cost estimates and prioritize and recommend needed facilties Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering Justification: The City's Bikeway Master Plan needs to be updated eve,I)' five years in order to keep the City eligible for grant funding for bicycle projects. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $200,000 Fund No 72300 Fund Name Bicycle Facilities Fund (TDA) F\'2008-09 $0 FY2010-11 $0 FY2011-12 $0 1'\'2012-13 $0 FY2013-14 $0 22700 63 ~\!(~ CITY OF '~I~1'CHUiJ\ VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project provides for the construction of ADA compliant pedestrian ramps throughout the City. flared sIde :'5~!~._>,....." ~ '\><:~"~i';, "~.' . --, '-~" ,/ ,f,tll.,~i ,,' A_"",.",.. ,. ..:>'!..~ ", .,,,,l'<<,,O:C:"'S/'" ,r' ."1;~': ~, '...\"..' 'h U ~~~~- -p<t;anSili/OPS/ ~".'.'/ . ~,,; ~, "'\ ~./ '. ::.' Project Location. Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Citywide Engineering Upgrade Justification: Existing pedestrian facilities lack curb ramps which limits the mobility of physically challenged persons. The construction oCthese ramps will increase the mobility of these citizens and assist in bringing the City into compliance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $504,922 64 :;:;,,\11(.. CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: City\vide Engineering Renovation and Replacement This is part of an ongoing program of pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction and will include overlays (one-inch thick ~nd greater) and some street reconstruction based on the recommendations of the City's Pavement !\.lanagement System. Justification: Rehabilitation of existing pavement is necessary to cost effectively extend its life and avoid further deterioration of the pavement and base material. Estimated Operation and i\'laintenancc Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $2,020,000 65 ~\(.s CITY OF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Justification: ~-I Preventive maintenance and preservation of existing pavement is necessary to cost effectively extend pavement life and avoid further deterioration of the pavement and base material Project Location: Department Responsible: Citywide Engineering Project Intents: Project Description: Renovation This project will provide for an ongoing program of pavement preservation and may include chip seals, sluny (REAS) and thin overlays (less than one-inch thick). Estimated Operation and r',/Iailltenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $450,000 Fund No Fund Name 22700 TransNet 66 ~\{?- CITY OF '~l::~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovcmcnt Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Renovation and Replacement This is part of an on-going program of-pavement preservation, rehabilitation, and reconstruction and may include overlays (one-inch thick and greater), complete roadway reconstruction, dig-out repairs, chip seals, and/or slurry seals, based upon the recommendations of the City's Pavement Management System. ;co I Project Location: Citywide Department Responsible: Public Works Justification: Rehabilitation, maintenance, and preservation of the City's roadway pavement is necessary to cost-effectively extend its serviceable life and to avoid advanced and rapid deterioration of the pavement resulting from the failure to maintain pavement in a timely manner. Estimated Operation and i'vIaintenancc Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $3,385,407 Fund Name FY2011.12 67 ~\IIf:.. CITY OF ~J~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Naples Street & Oleander Avenue ""., Department Responsible: Public "'orks ,.>iJ>' '...-, :.-~f"i>''''';'''~:-'::-:- t..-~>..~. '&""""',ijl~I~I![iji~"?'''''~ ,,, Jl\Jriillk.. ''10 y~ \'\\ \ \-\ " Project Intents: Project Description: RerioYrltion and Replacement Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross-gutter Reconstruction and Pedestrian Enhancements ~~ , Justification: Naples Street and Oleander Avenue is a signalized intersection, but not docs not operate optimally due to deep cross-gutters affecting north-south vehicular traffic, which lllust slow down significantly in order to avoid "bottoming out." This project would improve intersection capacity and provide needed ADA- compliant pedestrian improvements. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $205,000 Fund No FY2008-09 68 .:S.llt-- CITY OF ~(HUlAVlsrA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvcmcnt Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: Project lntents: Project Description: Industrial Blvd. from L Street to Pnlomar Street ~';' :".".:..<';-: "~C' "t +'~i\1; ..".\., ,,' ", [l~:~;~ Engineering Upgrade This project involves installing additional pavement and striping in order to construct a bike lane on both sides of the street from L Street and Bay Blvd. to Industrial Blvd. and Palomar Street. Justification: This project would complete one of the priority projects in the City's Bikeway Master Plan and add an important north-south bikeway corridor. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $353,370 Fund No Fund Name Miscellaneous Transportation Grants FY2008-09 SO FYl011-12 SO FY2012.13 $0 FY2013-14 $0 73610 22700 69 ~\II?- CITY OF ~l;;g (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Industrial Blvd. from Naples 51. to Palomar 5t. Department Responsible: Engineering Project Intents: Upgrade Projt:ct Description: Constructing a bike lane on both sides or Industrial Blvd and constructing curb, gutter and sidewalk on the east side of \.>"H' Industrial Blvd. " Justilication. This would provide additional pedestrian access between the elementary school and mobile home park at Naples 51. and the cOlllmercial area at Palomar 5t. Additionally, the Industrial Blvd. bike lanc is one orthe priority projects listed in the City's Bikeway Master Plan Estimated Operation and $0 Project Type: T Local Streets Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $429,200 Fund No 73654 Fund Name Smart Growth Incentive Program FY2008-09 $0 FY2010-11 $0 FY2011'12 $0 FY2012-13 $0 FY2013-14 $0 22700 $0 ....,.":.,,."",,"i'Ft./.....;.,...,:':..... ~lri'o'jc'ct:'N:lnr~': r~'(;otJ.:ir,'j}'t;'rh,.':,:' ~'J~T.oj~St::~g: 70 .J-II~ Cln' OF ~l~~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improyement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Planning and Building Revitalization Project Location: Third Avenue The goal 6fthe Third A venue Streets cape Improvement Project is to integrate revitalization efforts with a comprehensive street improvement program. Street improvements include "bulb out" traffic calming mensures at pedestrian street crossings; streetscape enhancements such as new median landscaping, street trees, lighting, furnishings and community gateway features, expanded bicycle parking, relocated transit stops and new transit shelters. Justification: This project implements the 2005 General Plan's Smart Growth principals and the 2007 Urban Core Specific Plan (chapter 1 I-Short Term Demonstration project); at no cost to the General fund. Estimated Operation and tvlaintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $3,300,000 Fund No Fund Name FY201l-12 FY2012-13 FY2(113-14 27412 CDBG - R $(1 $0 $0 $0 $0 GI110 Merged Bayfront $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Town~enter I 73G54 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 71 ~II{:: CITY OF 1'~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovemcnt Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Upgrade I 1_ ' ,",<" .' . ;." l-~,~~~t;~\ [-,' ,. ,,:/'.\ ,. [ ;':~:::i". ~^- ~"~ ~~':', ..;.:\\' \ '.\ " \. ;-": ; !. Project Location: North Side of! Street between Hilltop Drive and First Avenue Department Responsible: Engineering Installation of pee sidewalk, ADA compliant pedestrian ramps and driveway approaches, and upgrade existing pedestrian ramps to ClIlTCnt ADA Standards. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: This segment would fill in the gaps of missing sidewalk on the north side of! Street between Hilltop Drive and First Avenue. This project will increase the safety of pedestrians at the proposed location. The project is located within 1000 feet of Hilltop Drive ElementalY School. SO T Project Type: I Local Streets $232,440 Justification: Total Estimated Cost: Bicycle Facilities Fund (TDA) 22700 TransNct SO ~)hl:o jitt_:N-;;>ile1'SSTtlwt~rk?srfcl9.'i?l~ggrffi;1":':Str~1;erS-itl~~~f,~ikJf ;;i6t'O"f '~~,~:~j~~tJq?lt~"~~i$1Dl~3\jil;,~,~~"~~;}~~~~';~[f:t;~~:[~.,f" ~f.~~~,,~,s~i~:~';~ SO F\'2010,11 $0 I'Y2011-12 SO FY2012-13 $0 F\'2013-14 72300 $0 72 ;$\11(,- CITY 01' ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovcment Program Project Description Report Project Location: Broadway between C Street and 0 Street + ,~;i'I!II;-- ," ':,::.', ~;::",)lljil~"_" ;;,; , -,I: ~I' ~ -~ ;,-:.-.,.,,,,,,";' j ~ - ': \ I ~:.. \ - ':\ \ ---;:-1-'", l\t...'.\ ,,'''-' Depm1ment Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering , Renovation and Replacement . The purpose of tile project is to provide ultimate drainage system improvements to this project area that flood during periods of intense rainfall. In addition, this project will fe-construct the pavement section that is beyond overlay repair. Justification: This project will provide for street improvements and construct drainage facilities along Broadway from D Street to approximately 200 lineal feet North ofC Street. The scope of the work consists of a full street reconstruction, portions of curb & gutter, sidewalk, and driveways to be replaced, retrofitting pedestrian ramp to meet current ADA (American Disability Act) standards, replacement of traffic loops with video detection cameras, installation of approximately 2000 lincal fect of storm drain pipes, clcan-outs and curh-inlet structures within the project limits. Improvements will also be completed within the City of National City. This work consist of installing approximately 20.0 lineal feet of storm drain pipe and connecting it to an existing curb-inlet structure that discharge storm run-off water to the Sweetwater river. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: l\'lajor Streets Total Estimated Cost: $3,887,722 Fund No Fund Name Miscellaneous Transportation Grants Residential Construction Tax (RCT) 22700- TransNet ,,'<'<<<,,~ )H"'- ;"'P::::~. .,,-~,,_,: .;;-.'<.,~ .;.-",~+,,-t:-- '.J',r-:/'''c'' 1"'."%.".':'c>'..i!. mrt~ j~f~~~;~tiJ.~-.:m.ti W~\~.~L9~~1 \~~~y~,I~SC,.9~,~H',~,~t}q, :.;:-,,,,."!'t'7'.,,;r:.df1-.~S"_ ~- 3 '4"C2'''' -.,:.,J:;?S',,,,,,'-...'.'f!..,,;;"" .i'_t'''': ~rro.J ~~t~~~:~'"~.i_!>J}~l:.),_J,"5?q,.~K~~,->~l4';;Jt~:,~4} 71700 $0 1'\'2012-13 1'\'2013-14 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 33310 73610 CDBG 1'\'2008-09 $0 $2,178,000 73 ~\II?- CITY OF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitalllllprovelllent Prog,"alll Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Upgrade ."\~~~jl':C'\,' '\~ y,'" ~t\'/\:."~~~\ , ",m;;f2Tf,.f;~~~}:':~:: Project Location: Otay Lakes Rd, between Telegraph Canyon Road and Ridgeback Road and East H Street at Otay Lakes Rd Department Responsible: Engineering Widening of Otay Lakes Road between Telegraph Canyon Road and Ridgeback Road to six-lane major standards and East H Street at eastbound Otay Lakes Road to accommodate duulleft-turn and dual righHurn lanes. This project will be built in 2 or 3 construction phases. Justification: Segments of Otay Lakes Road uperate below threshold levels of service during peak traffic periods. This project will widen Otay Lakes Road to six.lanes between Telegraph Canyon Road and Ridgcback Road and will widen East H Street from Otay Lakes Road to the west, including dual left-turn and dual right-turn lanes from eastbound East H Street to Otay Lakes Road. This project will be constructed in 2 or 3 phases, as needed to meet established levels of service. The first phase will include ultimate improvements within East H Street and within Otay Lakes Road from Ridgeback Road to approximately 400 feet south of East H Street Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost; $0 T Project Type: I Major Streets Total Estimated Cost: $10,900,000 Fund No 59110 FY2010.1I $0 FY2013-14 $6,080,700 74 ~ (In' or- n",~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista . 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Heritage Road at Otay River, South of Main Street """ ",,,,...,,,1 '/"" Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Des~ription: Engineering j/"~ , , -' , Service Extension Preliminary Engineering, Project Design, and Environmental Analysis to determine the ultimate configuration and alignment of the Heritage Road Bridge over the Otay River, south of Main Street, needed to meet ultimate traffic demands at development build-out ,/'~ ~ Justification: In order to accommodate projected growth in southeastern Chula Vista and to link the City to Otay Mesa, the Heritage Road Bridge will ultimately need to be widened and/or realigned. This project will completeLI) preliminary engineering to determine the bridge's ultimate configuration and alignment; (2) environmental evaluation to determine environmental impacts, constraints, and mitigation requirements; and, (3) construction plans and specifications. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: iv!ajor Streets Total Estimated Cost: $2,494,089 Fund No F\'2011-12 F\'2012-13 F\'2013-14 73610 Miscellaneous $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transportation Grants 59110 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 75 ~lft.- eln' OF .~~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering +" " _.-..i~l~yti~;~.,. ~ ,- ..r'\~I?~).-:;~~~:.~.:--~ta,.!;ti"V~ "",""?V, ",c'".' ..;g.,^,. ,.," ,....",.{_.,t- ,-, '" "i',~;:;:.".-,.." ...t,.t",,'.1; . .., ,~"w'!;'~..;t'.>~:;At,,~ ' Ji, *">~p/ 'J;' -~ - .. i~"',: \, , ,\'., , 1 Project Location: Collectors and Al1erials Citywide Renovation This will provide major pavement rehabilitation, primarily overlays, for major streets and al1eriaIs that qualify for Federal funding Citywide. sl Justification: Estimated Operalion and r-.'laintenance Cost: This project will improve safety, appearance and pavement life for major streets in Chula Vista. $0 Project Type: rvlajor Streets Total Estimated Cost: $2,610,000 Fund N"amc 76 ~\I?- CITY OF ~ CHUIJ\VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Revitalization , ,~. cd'.=,1Ir + '=-J(..-.....; \\ L...-.....,L.,,.-:=ij. =-f-~ ;wr-=-1:..3:~':- >c, ="~~~ \~~;!. I,. I ,,III, Project Location: Broadway, Main. Street to Southern City Limits Dcpartmont Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Public Works Construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk, drainage Cacilities, and pavement replacement in Broadway, between fI.'lain Street and the southerly City limits \. ',\ Justification: This segment of Broadway lacks full street improvements and is the only remaining segment of13road\vay without sidewalks. Completion of these improvements will provide full pedestrian facilities along Broadway with City ofChula Vista and will connect to existing pedestrian facilities within the Cities of National City and San Diego. Estimated Operation and tv1aintenance Cost $0 I Project Type: I Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $2,200,000 77 ;sWt- CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering ~~;c~; \'~ ~il I~l\~~-'<'"-' '):'t.J Project Location: Colorado between J and K Renovation and Replacement Project involves the replacement of approximately 1,313 feet of 15 inch vcr with an IS-inch pipe on Colorado Street between "K" and "]" Street. Estimated Operation and iVlaintcnance Cost: Improvements required to mitigate capacity constraints in Colorado A vcnue Sewer. $0 'T Project Type: I Sewer $978,529 Justification: Total Estimated Cost: Fund No Fund Nnrne F\'2008-09 F\'20 12-13 F\'2013-14 41300 Trunk Sewer Cap Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 29300 Trunk Sewer Capital $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Reserve 78 :s'lf(.. CITY 01' ~!~~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Robinhood Ranch II . J~~t~~t~~ . 'il5f1~;!ltt'~' ;'~.~~ '~';ct~~~ Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Public Works Replacement This project involves the preparation of a preliminary design report, plans, specifications and cost estimates (PS&E) needed to fal.:ilitate the construction of improvements which will enhance the opcrability,and safety of tile Robinhood Ranch II pump station. Juslillcntion: The Robinhood Ranch II SPS was originally built in 1975. When it was originally constructed, it was located next to a streambed, which causes the lift station to be subject to periodic flooding. This is inconsistent with our current design standards. The surface of the \vet well has been experiencing rapid deterioration due to infiltration. This has caused an increase in the required maintenance and repairs to the pump station for the past several months. In addition, due to the current configuration of the pump station area, the vehiculnr access to the pump station needs to be improved. The goal of this project is to analyze, determine, and design the required improvements to mitigate these issues. Estimated Operation and lvlaintenance Cost: so Project Type: Sewer Total Estimated Cost: $450,000 42800 FY2008-09 $50,000 FY2011-12 $0 79 ~'II?- CITY 01' ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Renovation and Replacement The purpose of the project is to repairlreplace deteriorating sewer lines and manholes within the collection system identified as having significant structural deficiencies by the City's video monitoring program. Project Location: Citywide Department Responsible: Public Works Justification: Failure of any sewer pipe would resutt in significant loss of function within the system over an extended period of time in addition to potentia! water quality impacts or public health and safety impacts. Estimated Operation and l'vlaintcnance Cost: $0 Project Type: Sewer Total Estimated Cost: $300,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2012-13 $0 42800 Sewer Facility Replacement ". """";"'';''. ,,"'.'~"''',~,;''i'''!'':;''.'''';''_:,;;'f''''-::'''''':';-":.'J"",/ t '~~ojepiN_~lllC :~LSe;'yCi',,:~ehab-- ~.,.t:."",,;'~":_"";'iP'4."!,:.,m..,."......i":_ , p,i:{)ject'l'\o::~/"S\V.~60' 80 ~w?- CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovcmcnt Program Project Description Report Urgradc i\ '- --~---, HI . ;1\\ " , " ' . \\,1 r "~I -_.'-- '-- - "1 ; Project ~o'cation: Department Responsible: ~roject Intents: Project Description: Intersection of Industrial Boulevard and Main Street Public Works The project will study the confluence of two significant sewer lines within the intersection ofIndustrial Blvd. and ~'laill Street (within MH# 5106) to determine and design improvements to increase capacity within the system in the area. , i [<<... -...--.- I. 1_.0 , :1:' :' J; 1____ :~..:-::J ~, ..!.... Justification: Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: The location has been identified through the City's flow metering program as an area exceeding current design capacity thresholds. $0 Project Type: Sewer Total Estimated Cost: $;40,000 FY2008-09 $0 FY2013-14 $0 81 ~Iff:. CITY OF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Service Extension ,.'p'>,;\,-:, ,"I.-"'~' -I>- _ ... ';;";'1 ~.. QiI/';;"ij~\ll'!,'''''- .'<r; ........cr.'. t~~ ~""<f-l3!uf1,~- !1..;5"~":'j;q;;~~f;~~'~'C:ffi~'\Rij [1 ~(\','v 'f,.:~,E".~~j':'-.5:,'.-o:-~:' 'J~}1~~'~'~1 l'i\,:.r~l.",""i~"1;,,,< '~'J&f~k-l i~\, "'-6''''''-/ ! """~. \1'"1 .~11l:'l;~'{/')'( ~.'. d~ . ,.~4, i. '~<;;;1~ ;'f:~~'\%;~ ~ ",~ "".+' ,'-- '\ - ~\ !' .---..-..'\ Project Location: Eastern Chula Vista Department Responsible: Public Works Installation of permanent traffic count stations, which includes software and hardware, to monitor the traffic volumes/capacity of the major streets within the City on a continuous basis. This project will be on-going as necessary to collect/monitor data and create reports. Justification: Count stations are needed to assist in accll1'ately forecasting levels of service based on existing and added developments. Estimated Operation and !'vlaintenance Cost: $0 Proj ect Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $540,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2008-09 FY2013-14 22700 TransNet $0 $0 59110 Transportation $0 $0 Development 82 ;;j.1/?- (In' OF ~ CHUllWISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Installation of a fully actuated traffic signal system. .,..,,:0-.;.- \. "::~-\:{;';S,~~ \~. Project Location: Department Responsible: Second A venue and Quintard Street " . ;:::> ,*\~::, Public Works Project Intents: Project Description: Service Extension Justification: Intersection is at close proximity to Castle Park j\'Iiddle School. The intersection is ranked No.4 on the 2002/2003 Traffic Signal Priority List and this intersection has met the warrants for tra me signal school crossing. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $4,500 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $375,000 83 ;$\If;;.. CITY 01' ~CHULAVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital1mprovcmcnt Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide Public \Vorks + -' -;'v' ~ \~~,;~~r ,,~ );,. J~',:, ." Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Annual program that will provide for traffic count data and information as part of the Traffic Volume Count program. t~~' _ 1-P ~ .1.,:t.~. ..'L.ILd.ho.,....;.~,!J"W ...:} i.c~,~~ c;:ol Justification: Traffic counts arc required to provide data for safety commission studies, Traffic rvlonitoring Program (TMP), citizen complaints and various traffic management isslles. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $390,000 84 ~I({:. CITY OF ~ H~~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chllla Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvcmcnt Program Project Description Report Public V'larks ~I Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Citywide Justification: The project will provide for transportation planning studies associated with the GMOC's critical circulation system including Traffic Monitoring Program studies, transportation forecasting and intersection analysis. The intent of this project is to insure compliance with Gt-.'IOC threshold standards. This project is listed in: RTIP 08-00 CHV45 (Maintenance) All studies will be performed in order to understand and identify development's cumulative traffic impacts and it recommend mitigation measures consistent with GMOC goals. Estimated Operation and l\'laintcnance Cost $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $780,000 22700 59110 TransNet $20,000 1'\'2013-14 $0 $0 Fund No Fund Name 1'\'2008-09 S50,000 $50,000 1'\'2010-11 $20,000 $100,000 1'\'2011-12 $20,000 $100,000 1'\'2012-13 $\00,000 85 ::$'\{t.- Cln' OF ~ (HUlA VJ5fA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide Department Responsible: Public Works Project Intents: Project Description: This project will provide engineering support to address citizen requests/complaints, and provide for the implementation of traffic calming measures to address the requests/complaints (including resolutions adopted by the Safety Coinmission regarding traffic related issues). This includes, but is not limited to, the following tasks: field investigation, collection and analysis of data, management of citizen requests, preparation of studies and rcports, preparation of new City guidelines and/or policies to by approved by the Safety Commission and/or City Council, purchasing of traffic calming equipment, providing signing and striping, and public education. This project is listed in: RTIP 06-00 CHV34 Justilication: This project ,.viII address the challenges of a growing Transportation Network and assist with the reduction of speed and enhancement of safety through education. Estimated Operation and SO Project Type: I Traffic Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $1,330,000 Fund No FY2008-09 FY2011-12 SO FY2012-13 $0 FY2013-14 22110 86 ~\I If::. CITY OF ~ CHUlJ\ VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Fourth and Ivlain, Fourth and Beyer i:~::'::: Ii -I: '''-.J= I ~'-3 t=}t;"~'~f'-'-*~~ j '=-':'~~I~l I'---r" , -=-',: -.' '1-1 ' " - ~ 'Ii"'"- ',~\ '" ~,::-, +--- I Department Responsible: Public Works Project Intents: Project Description: Renovation This project will provide for repair work of existing traffic signal equipment to allow for optimal signal operations and update the signal system to current city standards and lengthen the lifespan of11le traffic signal as \vcll as improve its maintenance and operations. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: These aging traffic signals arc in disintegrating condition and in need of major repair and/or modifications. $0 I Project Type: Traffic Justification: Total Estimated Cost: $777 ,000 Fund No Fund Name 22500 Traffic Signal $0 22740 TransNet ARRA $0 Exchange 87 ~\Iff::. CITY OF ,~ CHUIA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Replacement of existing traffic signal equipment at intersection and installation ofncw 4-phase traffic signal. II ! ,I I 11-c.'""'L -== I 1=__--:11::: ! .,,_. I' _j~__~: II ,------ .'--- ~- 11=i-l~---:~ ,~-. J Project Location: Third and I'vlontgomcry Department Responsible: Public Works Estimated Operation and l'vlaintemUlce Cost: Condition of existing signal is beyond repair and/or modification. Replacement oftmme signal will assist with maintenance and .improve traffic circulation and intersection safety along Third ^ venue and will provide vehicle detectioll. $0 T P,oject Type: I Traffic $690,000 Justification: Total Estimated Cost: Fund No Fund Name FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 F\'2013-14 22500 Traffic Signal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 22700 TransNet $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 22740 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 88 ~11f::.. CITY 01: .tt!~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Depmimcnt Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Public Works sl Project Location: Citywide This project will provide for grinding/sandblasting of existing striping, pavement markings, installation of new signs and striping, traffic control and protection/restoration of existing improvements within the City. This project will also address the challenges of a growing transportation network and assist with traffic calming, and increasing safety along roadways. This project is listed in: RTIP 08-00 CHV35 (Maintenance) Justification: Program will allow modification of existing striping and signage at various locations due to lane adjustments ill an effort to improve traffic flow and overall safety of the roadways. Estimated Operalion and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $613,680 89 ~II?- CITY OF ''!.~~ (HULA VISTA Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Justification: Estimated Operation and i'vlnintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Citywide , ,A~' ~ "J + '1X~/1A.;,' I 1 .' ,~;;,";~:,;~Ji:("';:)~!''7;. \~ ,~ '.. ", 'r-.riA~~~;>~---:-:~,,1t't~1o---1;lS;;!4W1'~';{ ;'''~~ -'_f. . '\,,/ ~~~:.t~t41g:-~~ \, .\':.mt.)..,..-;!...;,.t"!~;:~'lt;~ ni.~J l . ..tV}~",:1 ~"" ~,;%/l;. ".J. . ""';M .,.c!;J'i.~:a,~';4~" ., ..,,\~-\;..<~ . )l~.. t ~ ~~ :.!:f:." ,.t-\- Public Works Upgrade This project includes the data collection and analysis of left-turn movements at signalized intersections in order to create a priority list of signalized intersections that warrant modification. Based on available funds, this project will also upgrade traffic signals with protected. left turn phasing based on this priority lis!. The following intersections are currently ranked no. 1/2 on the priority list: Fourth Avenue & 'G Street (scheduled modification FY 09110), and Broadway & Oxford Street (scheduled modification FY 10/11). .,,1 Will allow motorists to safely maneuver left turns into the intersections during a protective phase thereby enhancing traffic safety, reducing broadside accidents, potentially decreasing delays and improving air quality. $0 Project Type: Traffic $1,376,649 90 ~\I/f:. CITY or- ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovcmcnt Program Project Description Report Project Location: 1-805 Department Responsible: Public Works Project Intents: Service Extension Project Description: IntcHlgenc)' coordination with Caltrans and SANDAG during preliminary engineering and design of managed lanes, interchange modifications and improvements on 1-805 for carpool (HOY) Janes. Possible on/off ramps planned at East Palomar Street and East H Street interchanges, including highway widening, restriping, signal improvements, transit facilities and landscaping. This project is one of SANDAG's Early Action projects for Transnet II. Justification: This project will allow staff to coordinate with Caltrans on the design of improvements. Callrans and SANDAG are studying improving 1-805 to eight (8) general purpose lanes plus four \4) managed lancs for ultimate freeway buildout. Estimated Operation and $0 T Project Type: I Traffic Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $205,000 Fund No Fund Name TransNct 22700 91 .=$\lf{:. CITY OF ~t!~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: project Intents: Project Description: Public Works . ._~o\:_~---'.J:J -.J_ . ....-:1/~\,,'ot~:~>ijlt~~J' _.. "I -. \t."^\",'~;,.1"0:::/':<'i t'i~""_::~"~.' i7"".~i/i '4 'u', . "y"" "~" . .. , I" I ~, _;~~::~._.'~. ,'; ,. '':- ,~~-;r\}.:14.~~~rr~~'.:~ .! ".\ ,':4'~,~io,U;:~ l;\i ..~~ ,41'" ~~:_ \) , ~~W ,,'-l- ..I~! h r~"_~'W 0 iIoJ....~ 81 Project Location: Citywide This project will develop traffic calming guidelines and/or polices, will update/analyze traffic collision records, and will implement and manage traffic control devices on public streets citywide. Tn addition, this project will be Ilsed as a local match funding source for traffic related grant opportunities. This project is listed in: RTIP 06-16 CHV 33 Justil1cation: With the increasing number of schools build in the City, staff has received an increased number in citizens requesting traffic control improvements as a result of traffic concerns related to speeding, congestion, parking, signing and striping near school. This program will allow staff to coordinate with school officials and citizens requesting traffic improvements in planning, implementing and managing school traffic. Estimated Operation and M~inlenal1cc Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $1,084,600 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 92 ~\If:.. CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvcmcnt Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Public Works :~I Project Location: Citywide Upgrade This program will provide consultant services for the City to assist staff with upgrading existing trame signal coordination to improve traffic circulation, reduce intersection delays and reduce congestion throughout the City. City CV and SANDAG obtained TLSP (Traffic Light Synchronization Program) Grant for three corridors ill Chula Vista: Broadway, H Street & Palomar Street. This project is listed in: RTIP 08 CHV39 (CR) Justification: Nev,' developments in traffic signal coordination technology are now available that can greatly improve the efficiency oftmme signal operations and more effectively coordinate traffic signals to reduce travel times, delays and congestion along the City's major traffic corridors. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $500,000 Fund Name 1'\'2013-14 93 ~Iff:.. CITY OF I'!!!~... CHUIAVISIA ~::i:.-::Z- City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Citywide :::CI Public Works This program will ~llow for identification and implementation of solutions for congestion relief on local streets. Remedies may include activities sllch as median installation for safety improvement or left turn movement; new traffic signals, Protective Permissive Left Turn (PPL T) installation, signal removals, traffic signal upgrades, intersection studies to detennine/justify traffic signal installations/modifications, signal intersection lighting, traffic signal coordination, tmftic signal interconnection, video traffic surveillance systems, and traffic data/count collection systems for performance monitoring purposes. This project may also help initiate the creation of new CIP Projects to address larger scale projects that require additional funding. This project is listed in: RTIP 08.00 CHV 43 (CR). Justification: The TransNet Ordinance allows for at least 70% ofrc"cnues providcd for local street and road purposes be used to fund direct expenditures for facilities contributing to congestion relief. This project allows for efforts that arise outside of other established CIP projects. Estimated Operation and Ivlaintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traftic Total Estimated Cost: $500,000 94 ~\l{{:. CITY OF ~CHULAVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Otay Mesa Transportation System Project Locntion: . State Route (SRI II and SR 905 Public Works Justification: This project will allow the City ofChula Vista to coordinate with Caltrans, SANDAG, the County of San Diego and the City of San Diego regarding proposed changes in land uses, Port of Entry, and circulation element roadways (SR-lIlSR-90S) that affect border region and the southerly portion of the City ofCV. This project is listed in: RTIP 08 CI-IV44 (CR) Estimated Operation and ivIaintenancc Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic. Total Estimated Cost: $150,000 Fund No 22700 95 ~\lf:. CITY 01: 'f:!~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/1 0-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: SR54 Public Works Project Intents: Project Description: State Route 54 Corridor Improvements and Arterial Operations Justification: During the peak periods of travel, there is much commuter lost time due to existing lane geometry bctwecnlhe on/off-ramps. This project will allow City staff to meet with regional stakeholders such as Caltrans <lllcl SANDAG in order to expedite improvements to State Route S4 due to impending smart growth trends expected on the City's west side. Increased density is expected in the areas generally bounded by I-80S to the east and SR-54 to the north. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $150,000 Fund No FY2013-14 22700 96 ~ CITY OF ~~:E'~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvcmcnt Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Public Works 'C'il Project Location: Citywide Project Intents: Project Description: This project is to gather data from residents living across the entire City through community meetings and walking audits (at 36 deferent elementary schools) regarding miss,ing or desired pedestrian related facilities within residential communities and neighborhoods. Each walking audit will be facilitated by WalkSanDiego, a local grassroots, non. pro lit organization focused on improving \Nalkability throughout the region, per City agreement of$194,310. The City applied for a grant funding through the Community Based Transportation Planning Program and the applicntion was approved. The City has accepted the grant funds per resolutioos 2008-003, 2008-004, 2008-005, 2008-006, and lOOS-007, Justification: Estimated Operation and rvtaintcnance Cost $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $402,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2013-14 $0 22700 Kids Walk and Bike to School Program TransNet 73652 97 -S,II;;.. CITY OF '4'~ CHULA VISTA City of Chllla Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovcmcnt Program Project Description Report Upgrade Upgrade and maintain traffic signal and streetlight systems including, but not limited to, improvements to interconnect conduits and cables, vehicle detection systems, uninterruptible power supplies, signal signage, emergency vehicle preemptions systems, signal controllers and appurtenances. This project also includes the update of the Traffic Signal Improvement GIS Database Layer. This project is listed in: RTIP 08-00 CHV35 (l'vTaintcnancc) +' .i,~t\:\ ~~ " ~.,.;f'-;!",1f:";:::,',.u:~J:\' . ~ . 1""\"'~~;~':-' ".~;",-:.:,,",~:: ~\lIl.'ffi.ftv 'S'~:'( .l'<':\-'/J.l}!",,-......';\'t.'S'1, -!-''; h\x.~'. " ';;~~1~:'f.~ );>- .-J,r_<d?....... '..:>;.!;If.'~'''''~! ,J~';.; :F~~\&7:i'.?1Hi"~ ~.:,' "J.." ).~ "lfr' v'<r.:::~<#... 1', .. . .l!;c~J~(tr 'l':ic,' \,} i'j~ r;~wg"-~ \-,.\ )>' , .';'T:.?~- {,,-~. ~ ,,1-. ~-"" to_~,i.i~ ........' ir.,;".~~ ,," I Project Location: Departmcnt Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Citywide Public \Vorks Justification: Proper maintenance and utilization of new technology on traffic signal and streetlight systems helps ensurc signalized intersections within the City operate as efficiently and safely as possible. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $1,518,003 1'\'2010-11 1'\'2011-12 1'\'2012-13 $200,000 $60,000 1'\'2013-14 98 ,::S\llf:. CITY OF ~ (HUl.A VISTA City ofChula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Depattment Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: '---\;.;-------\~~~~;-'{I .....-=--'~;;:::@.,"-:~~::~'i! I j :~:~~li '(II 1_.,_I~~"."_j~:=:=-._=~Li_...." .."l~__."._. ,'- J Intersection is at close proximity to Otay Elementary School. The intersection is ranked #2 on the 2005 Traffic Signal Priority List and this interection meet the Warrant for Traffic Signal Installation. Engineering Project Location: Intersection of Albany A venue and Orange A venue Service Extension Installation of fully actuated Traffic Signal System Justification: Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 I Project Type: I Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $350,000 99 ~I/t- CITY OF .~ CI-lULAVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Intersection of Hilltop Drive and i\,lain Street :".'. ... ,0' iLii- ;;,'(~l -, ;,." ~ ,y....... " Department Responsible: Engineering -' U:''-'j"l! ! t /:: ,,;'1='1 IIT"~",,,,,,, .. tf' .r .~.~" Project Intents: Upgrade I ~h~-- I'-~'-' . Project Description: This project will provide for repair work of existing traffic signal equipment to allow for optimal signal operation and 'i";",,,, .' -\ ..,,,:,.1 update signal system to current City standards and lengthen the lifespan of traffic signal as well as its maintenance and ; I.. ;"1 rI- ." operations. I' F 1 I. ~ , Justification: This aging traffic signal is in disintegrating condition and docs not meet current design standards, and is in need of major repair and modification. Estimated Operation and $0 I Project Type: I Traffic iVlaintenance Cost: Total Estimatcd Cost: $250,000 Fund No 1'\'2008-09 FY2012-l3 22500 100 GLOSSARY OF FINANCE AND BUDGET TERMS Accrual Basis of Accounting - The accounting basis used by the City by which transactions are recognized when they occur, regardless of the timing of cash receipts and disbursements Accounting System - The collective set of records and procedures used to record, classify, and report information on the financial status and operations of the City. Accounts Payable - Amounts owed by the City to external entities for goods and services received. Accounts Receivable - Amounts due to the City from external entities for goods and services furnished. Adopted Budget - The title of the budget following its formal adoption by resolution of the City Council. Amended Budget - The title of the budget version that includes all amendments to the Adopted Budget approved by Council throughout the fiscal year Appropriation - A legislative act by the City Council authorizing the expenditure of a designated amount of public funds for a specific purpose. Audit - An examination of City records and accounts by an external source to check their validity and accuracy. Bond - A certificate of debt issued by a government or corporation guaranteeing payment of the original investmentplus interest by a specified future date. Budget - A spending plan and policy guide comprised of an itemized summary of the City's probable expenditures and revenues for a given fiscal year. Capital Expenditures - Expenditures related to the acquisition, replacement, or improvement of a section of Chula Vista's infrastructure. Capital Improvement Program - The long-range construction plan designed to foresee and address the City's future capital needs. Capital Project - Any major construction, acquisition, or renovation that increases the useful life of the City's physical assets or adds to their value. Debt Service - Payment of interest and repayment of principal to holders of the City's various debt instruments. Depreciation - The expense incurred with the expiration of a capital asset. Direct Costs - Operational expenditures exclusive to a specific service or program. Discretionary Revenue - Revenues that are generated by general or specific taxing authority such as Property or Sales Taxes. 101 Encumbrance - The designation of appropriated funds to buy an item or service. Fiscal - Of or pertaining to the finances of the City Fiscal Year - The twelve-month period beginning July 1st and ending June 30th of the subsequent calendar year. Fixed Assets - An asset with a useful life greater than three years. Full-time Equivalent Positions - The conversion of a part-time, temporary, or volunteer positions to a decimal equivalent of a full-time position based on an annual amount of 2,080 hours worked. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - A uniform set of minimum standards for external financial accounting and reporting. Gann Appropriation Limit - A State of California mandated appropriation limit imposed on local jurisdictions. General Fund - See Operating Budget. General Plan - The fundamental policy document that guides the City's future growth and development. General Revenue - See Discretionary Revenues. Grants - A contribution by a government or other organization to provide funding for a specific project. Grants can either be classified as capital projects or operational, depending on the grantee. Indirect Cost - Costs that are essential to the operation of the City but not exclusive to any specific service or program. Indirect costs are primarily associated with support departments such as City Clerk, City Attorney, Administration, Management Information Systems (MIS), Human Resources, and Finance. Infrastructure - Basic physical assets such as buildings, streets, sewers, and parks. Interest Expense -Interest costs paid by Chula Vista on loans and bonds Liability - Debt or other legal obligations arising out of past transactions that will be liquidated, renewed, or refunded at some future date. Memorandum of Understanding - A document detailing the outcomes of labor negotiations between the City and its various bargaining units. Municipal Code - A collection of ordinances approved by City Council. Operating Budget - Costs associated with the on-going, day-to-day operation of the City. Ordinance - A formal legislative enactment by the City Council. 102 Other Expenditures - All budgeted expenditures that do not fall into one of the three primary expenditure categories: Personnel, Supplies and Services, and Capital. Personnel Services Expenditures - Salaries, wages, and benefits paid for services performed by City employees. Program Revenue - Revenues generated by a given activity. Proposed Budget - The title of the budget prior to its formal adoption by resolution of the City Council. Reserves - The portion of the General Fund balance set aside for contingencies. Resolution - A special order of the City Council that requires less legal formality than an Ordinance. Spending Plan - A preliminary budget approved by Council contingent upon subsequent adoption of appropriations. Supplies and Services Expenditures - Expenditures for supplies required for the daily operation of the City and for contractual and professional services. Yield - The rate of return earned on an investment based on the price paid. 103 INDEX ~~:JD~~.pl DR180 DR182 DR183 GG183 GG187 LB137 LB143 OP200 OP202 OP206 OP208 OP212 OP217 OP218 PR279 RD241 o R7';fr,j"A G"E' "...,...__;...___..n.,___".....__",'_n,.! 26501800 Emergency Storm Drain Replacement 26501820 Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvements, K Street to First Avenue 265018300 Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Avenue to Hilltop Drive 21041830 21041860 22051370 22001430 21492000 21452020 21462060 21482080 21492120 21402170 21402180 23072790 25042410 G:E'j,fE-~'Ai!fG q:VER}fr-.(EN:tl GIS - Orthophotography I Topography Project Fuel Tank Removal and Replacement at John Lippitt Public Works Center li.loB RA R.Y: .m._..._.__._n_m'._'''m__.'''.....:l Automation Advancements & Upgrade Civic Center Library Veterans Wing QJ:rH,!:'~::,E,R.Cl;J~QI~S. Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program CIP Advanced Planning Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade CIP Management & Equipment Purchase Parking Meter Replacement Program Palomar Gateway Specific Plan Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area PAreR K-~A HD'?~E C:R E AnON All Seasons Park R,EDEV E',E:ofiTMEN, 'T,.',,';, __..,_.__..._..._",.._.,U...::......,......._ "'",,' ,,.. Storefront Renovation Program t~ ~Q 2!Q ~J ~2 '\3 ~4 ~5 ~_9. '47 :~8 Ill) ~O 5.1 53 54 '55 104 105 SE.liii"E'RS~ ~."._ J SW234 26052340 Sewer Improvements on Colorado, J to K 178 SW256 26092560 Robinhood Ranch II Pump Station Improvements (Surrey Drive) ,79 SW260 26002600 Sewer Rehab for FY09-1 0 ItD SW261 26002610 Industrial Blvd, And Main Street Capacity Enhancement $1, [:J:~:~~:~J~T~] TF274 24522740 Traffic Count Stations '(3~ TF316 24553160 Signal Installation - Second Ave and Quintard St 83 TF321 24553210 Citywide Traffic Count Program 8;'1 TF325 24573250 Transportation Planning Program .8Q TF327 24563270 Neighborhood Safety Program 8~ TF330 24563300 Traffic Signal Modifications, Fourth and Main and Fourth and Beyer ail TF331 24563310 Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Montgomery ~~ TF332 24563320 Signing and Striping Program a~ TF337 24563370 Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Program 9Il TF344 24573440 I 805 Direct Access Ramp East H and East Palomar ~~' TF345 24573450 School Zone Traffic Calming 'gz TF350 24583500 Traffic Signal Optimizatior> 9~ TF354 24583540 Traffic Congestion Relief Program M TF356 24583560 Otay Mesa Transportation System Improvements 95 TF359 24583590 SR-54 Corridor and Arterial Ops 9,,6 TF362 24593620 Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 9.7 TF366 24593660 Traffic Signal and Streetlight Maintenance !'fa TF370 24503700 Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue 99 TF371 24503710 Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive and Main Street 'ioi:) 106 ,~ ',' ~, , ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "@~'\7 @} ~~" ~~ CO) [fDCQ) ~ [E[j) [B3 (LJJ [J)(G [EJr [FV1(0)(o)~= ~(O) <, '" . . " . :~, . . .~' .' ' '} >1 !~" "t;~J,/ '!,~~;'1 ,--" :1. ,:' r.. ~I ;:~~~:t < .,,' "~l; "r'i~"f1..mn;", ; ',,' "JJj"W<lLf:},~ W :n,~,(l,ID 0 ,~fl)O~ij~~J? ~,fl,6,)'.r":" .- -1 , ;r. ,~~r'~"" :'l>~ ~,i~:>~'-' . ""', . :,':':l:~: , ..,- . ~ .' ""'" '. ,i . ~': - . ;:~~;..1h- :,~;>/,l1 '," '~ i ,';~.r .,. i, ' .,':, ,\,,,:, I,,\',!,iC;'...., . ,.' ,:t ,.;~ "~.. ,.; '.;~. 'i..... .~r,} "'~:I:. J,,,', .r', . ,~i1'~~~~~'~ \~f;.!~:~::.,<J.~ ;.is:' ;;' :~~'~/;"~'~' '<:', i,'" :1.1;',; .'~ ~., t, "I "'. ,1,' . IJ' ."n ,,>'" t. 1" ;i~f;:~ w~i'l:g,,'~~';;< ,. ~:~:.'.;,;, ';:" .:: ' "~r't""I'IU,,,.r'lW-., ~"'f>;p.~1,.~)"'1."r.;,.~~~~,.e, ;~!~~;t;.~:l;'~';f:~~.;~~';;~~i~r:/:"::'~- ;.."~t;f;:f ~::~,'.:~:':. ~'. '-~/-;~;;:~" , jlij':' , ,: '. "eU:~ "R ,I' , 11.., "'I~'f. ,:' ," , ~l'~J:i;';',., 'ai":~'v,,,,,, ,ct~ ;,~,,: !i~( ," :'1t~i;~'~~l~!r:~;::,~~f~;rt;;~ '\:~:~::,>~'~ " ': ':lii ':!i;(';:;\ik.~~~~':'f~i;;;::i'frfr~i,,:!,:, , : ";c"., t(, ""';;::"l """;'!"':l'i:':'~""",,,,,,:!~ ,~~''''\, I' ',i',. '::, \ '"".j"" ."' .. ' "'I"~'l'll,t, ,r d' ,t ' " "-",:l" >t!' .!, , ", ; .~ '. ." 1'"" ':'1'1,. '/,,,,' <tt"'~~ v v '11 .." ./~;:" "';;~:~.:;;", i;;~;~;: ';!'~~~:1:,: ,\,1;:-:., ;'; ''', '; .. '~I" L"" '/."',,!, ::,;',1"'" '__'"""".,1.., "i,pl ""t. ~:';.,r.. 1 ...~jj;. IJf-I'd' "1:" :j 11'~~I1, ,':, ,1 /1 -"." 1; "'.J~~:Pit':!lt k.ll~ I". ,,:l r' '~l II ;pt,,';;''', ~111,;.:t ';~'l,' "'J,.';J;1>""';,ll,l '>>:'''", "~i w~, "'" 0:.. ,." ~" .1)'1'" ,:,~.,.", 'n "ti: .n: ,;'" :','I;,n'. "~! "P;~ ,gh\ " .~'" "'1 ' 'l~ ' . ,j:!.;i'; t '.lr,," ~ -j :/'1 '1" 5;; ":', )'!i""if'''''''I::'l~' ~"1 II: '1~}"'~lr':"ruJ:,,,~ ,Ii,i. '''C,', ',-,.J,:' ",n'I'1:,""., "t' .~, ,,;, "':"'''iiI]'' 'r"" .., . I "1..' """~r:~:~?;< ;,11~ :.,,~:.' , t ~.._ ,,)' j,;;"'ltj ~.'" '. ,.,,~, ,.,.>:,;.'>\ f, ,~,~~.. , '. " ,fi;,'" ',,, '.. , "( I' . '~:'il~!:> . .: ;,'i~L:-,:.' ~ '-;';Ii:;~: i.~' ..,' I "Jr~~,:.'.,.',.."v,.,.~.,:;r,ll,;!).,l\?:,:"::i',,, ""~,"ii ;acl1:" "" ),1,' ".:.) " ,. , '. " ,Ji f,' ,1.1,1. t;n~ (i' ',>, j' ': ~ J. ~ .. ';, " ., ,":" :.~!Il';ri, ' ,~ ." : ;;~j:':! !" : ':~ "l. t.l~' ,!'ii!t;: ' - 'FI' " . ,f~, ,I ' >;:,':: l!' , ' ! ~::;' :':1'.... ~ ,l! j, .t;~ ), , ",_. M: ,;.~;; ::. ,,~:: .,' I m~ :1' ,"~' ;~.l L ._.----:-~ ,~ , , . ",--..<< , , <<-~--_. ~ ~ It-- ~ ~ ---.-. CITY OF (HULA VISTA CHERYL COX MA YOR JOHN MCCANN DEPUTY MAYOR STEVE CASTANEDA COUNClLMEMBER RUDY RAMIREZ COUNClLMEMBER PAMELA BENSOUSSAN COUNCILMEMBER JAMES D. SANDOVAL City Manager DONNA NORRIS City Clerk BART MIESFELD City Attorney ~~~ ~ --....... --- ~ ""-................ CllY OF CHULA VISTA ADMINISTRATION James D. Sandoval Scott Tulloch Gary Halbert Leah Browder City Manager Assistant City Manager Deputy City Manager Deputy City Manager D I RECTORS Michael Meacham Maria Kachadoorian Dave.Hanneman Kelley Bacon Louie Vignapiano Richard P. Emerson Richard Hopkins Buck Martin Director of Conservation and Environmental Services Director of Finance Fire Chief Director of Human Resources Director of Information Technology Services Chief of Police Director of Public Works Director of Recreation Hi . , G' GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Distinguished Budget Presentation Award I'RES~;NTED TO City of Chula Vista California Prcsidt:nt Executive Direclor For the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2008 ~ /-. jCt ~~~ v ~~f?- ~ .....,.;: -...;: -...;: """ ...................~......... ..................."""'""""" CITY OF CHUlA VISTA ORGANIZATION CHART Citizen Advisory Commissions Citizen Advisory Boards Assistant City Manager Deputy City " Deputy City Manager Manager Police Human Planning & [ Library ] Resources Building Fire Information & Development Recreation Technology Svcs Services Administration Finance Redevelopment Animal Care Agency Facility Public Works Housing Authority vii TABLE OF CONTENTS BU DGET MESSAGE Transmittal Memo Economic Overview Summary of Budget Reductions Summary of Staffing Changes 1 3 11 15 29 39 41 51 59 77 85 87 95 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY General Fund Revenue Summary General Fund Expenditure Summary Department Summary Reports DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUND REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING FUNDS Redevelopment Agency Funds Housing Authority Funds SEWER FU N DS TRANSIT FUNDS FLEET FUND CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS OTHER FUNDS 99 111 119 127 143 151 ix CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CiP) Capital Improvement Program Summary Revenue Summary Expenditure Summary Capital Improvement Projects Summary 183 185 189 193 201 205 207 213 231 239 247 261 263 267 271 285 289 291 293 297 303 SUMMARY TABLES Fund Appropriations by Department and Expenditure Category Schedule of Revenues Fund Balance Projections Schedule of Inter-fund Transfers Authorized Positions by Department APPENDIX Budget Process Fiscal Policies Investment Policies Debt Administration Gann Appropriation Limit Legal Debt Margin List of Acronyms Glossary Chula Vista at a Glance x :.(\ (j~ t ,r~ , ..." " .j -,,' '~, ~"', -, f ,,,.,~ ""r-- ;':' ,; ~:: .~ _...nh';;IilIJ :.:; r ':' iI, "...'-j/;: 'h f""? "I' "1 % I,'. l'rdl " "'.,, L ,I .'':1;, J- ,l,,~: 'i.w"'" ,,,..t..,".:;....:1 :; PROPOSED BUDGET BUDGET MESSAGE T ransm itta I Memo Economic Overview Summary of Budget Reductions Summary of Staffing Changes -1- ~C1lYOF ~ CHUIA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER MAY 26, 2009 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL In December 2007, the national economy officially entered a recession, now projected to be the worse since the Great Depression of 1929. This significant decline in economic activity has severely impacted all economic sectors including government agencies. The City of Chula Vista felt the effects of the recession earlier than most agencies primarily due to the rapid residential growth experienced during the past six years and the effects of the foreclosure crisis, which eventually spread across the Country. The City has been going through ongoing budget adjustments in an attempt to bring its expenditures in line with revenues as the economy continued to deteriorate. To follow is the operating budget and capital improvement program budget for fiscal year 2009-10 for your consideration. The General Fund operating budget reflects the implementation of the Budget Reduction Plan that identified the necessary cuts in order to bring ongoing expenditures in line with current revenue projections. BUDGET REDUCTION PLAN In the fiscal year 2008-09 First Quarter Financial Report to the City Council, staff identified a deficit of $4.0 million in the General Fund and projected that it would grow to approximately $20.0 million in fiscal year 2009-10. The deficit was due to the continued decline in the housing market and the overall deterioration of the local economy. In order to avoid a deficit in the current fiscal year and to begin identifying additional cuts necessary for fiscal year 2009-1 0, City departments began a comprehensive process to develop a budget reduction plan. This process began with briefings of city employees, labor groups, City Council and the media. Following the initial briefings was the establishment of an employee focus group to generate cost saving ideas and several community workshops were conducted to receive the public's input. The Budget Reduction Plan was presented to the City Council. in December 2008 and included the elimination of 166.5 positions. The Council approved the Budget Reduction Plan on January 13, 2009 at which time the implementation of a majority of the plan moved forward. -3- Since the approval of the Budget Reduction Plan, the number of positions proposed to be eliminated was reduced to 100.5 due to the elimination and/or deferral of the cost of living adjustments scheduled for January 2009 and January 2010 and additional funding identified for specific positions either from grants or the economic stimulus program. The elimination of these cost of living adjustments also helped to mitigate the projected deficit in the current fiscal year. The proposed fiscal year 2009-10 General Fund budget takes into account all position cuts and are presented in this document. A more detailed description of the budget reduction plan can be found in the Summary of Budget Reductions following this section. The Summary of Budget Reductions includes a summary of the staffing changes by department and bargaining group as well as an overview of the anticipated service impacts resulting from the implementation of the budget reduction plan. FISCAL HEALTH PLAN The Chula Vista Health Plan, which was endorsed by the City Council in January 2009, is comprised of four major parts and is an outline designed to position the City back to strong financial status on a long- term basis. I. Expenditure Cuts II. Revenues III. Economic Development IV. Budget and Fiscal Reforms Expenditure Cuts - The City began making significant expenditure cuts in fiscal year 2006-07 and has continued to do so in an attempt to avoid deficit spending. Including the cuts implemented with the Budget Reduction Plan, the total staff reductions by departments range from -9% to -64%. With the severe reduction in staffing levels citywide, an operational review is recommended to provide an unbiased analysis regarding staffing efficiencies. .Revenues - A comprehensive review of the MasterFee Schedule will begin in the summer to ensure that the City fees are set at appropriate levels. Economic Development - A critical element towards the City's long-term fiscal health is the continued development and diversification of the City's revenue base. Potential future growth areas include sales tax and transient occupancy tax from new and expanded commercial development in the City's Bay -4- front and through a Western Chula Vista Revitalization Program. Development of the Eastern Urban Center and the University and Technology Park will contribute towards the City's long-term fiscal stability by providing high paying local jobs. Budget and Fiscal Reforms - In addition to securing additional revenues, the proposed Fiscal Health Strategy recommends implementation of a number of budget reforms. The specific actions recommended include the following: . Detailed fiscal impact analysis of the short-term and long-term impacts of Council actions in staff reports (Implemented). . Cross-departmental analyst support (Implemented) . Update of General Fund Reserve Policy (In Progress) . Implementation of zero-based budgeting (Implementation to begin with the development of the fiscal year 2010-11 proposed budget) . Development of a City of Chula Vista Long-Term Financial Strategy for sustainability (In Progress) GENERAL FUND RESERVES The Council's General Fund minimum reserve level policy of 8%, which became effective in 1996, was established to prudently protect the fiscal solvency of the City. Reserves are important in order to mitigate the negative impact on revenues from economic fluctuations, to withstand State budget grabs and to fund unforeseen expenditure requirements. As evidenced by the chart below, the General Fund reserves were at 28.5% of the operating budget at the end of fiscal year 2001-02. The City's General Fund reserves placed the City in the enviable position to withstand the State's revenue cuts during fiscal years 2004 and 2005 and provided the City with the opportunity to reinvest back into the community Since 2006, primarily due to the significant slowdown in the housing market and the overall economy, the reserves dropped to 6.1 % at the end of fiscal year 2008. Based on the most current projections reported to the City Council in the Third Quarter Financial Report, it is anticipated that the General Fund reserves will stabilize at the 6.1 % level or $9.3 million. This is due to the implementation of the Budget Reduction Plan, which included layoffs, -5- as well as the implementation of an administrative freeze on all non-essential expenditures and a loan repayment to the General Fund from the Redevelopment Agency. As discussed under the Fiscal Health Plan section, an updated General Fund Reserve Policy is currently being drafted for Council consideration that will provide criteria and guidance on the use of reserves. 30% .,.. 5% ._.--_.~ ..-------- --------.--.------.~..-~-.--- ...-. . i -- --------..---...-.---------.-.- . ~ i: f-~ -----~ --;:-11 nf~ .' c. ,..,. 'f [" .': IJ :'.; ,': t' ~ - Ita -I~l ~ --- fi I'I..! "---ao/-r.;;t. -, - - ,.p - ~-.ti .f... I, - .~ _~__._.____ ~ ~ ~ " 10c"~,~ ..,.:fI. ~ !~? 111' '~~ :::~ ,"" '" ~ :.' f.J; ~ I' II, ~~ .! .~ I,;' '" ill .. I~I . .,,' f'~ rn'~l,," ,.,.. ~: ;:\:., , Ill-' :. ,r ;~ ....~ ":,,. ~I ld ,.,.. ":"i I <i'.,' ,," ,I" -- i'< ".j" 'ii ~ Ii ~,l" . ~ ~:~ I~ ;, tJ . ~,~ ,1j. 'i:J, ,~ k'" ~i' ~. ,., 11. -'! " " .'if!' , " ~ r" :J..t 'fC' , ~ ''1' -, , it, " <r.. ~ "-'-' ., c"" 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 9 25% 20% 15% 1 0% 0% 1989 1991 1993 1995 ALL FUNDS BUDGET OVERVIEW The combined revenue budget for all City funds totals $290.0 million; including $55.2 million in inter fund transfers. Revenues for fiscal year 2009~ 10 are projected to remain relatively fiat when compared to fiscal year 2008~09. The largest revenue source is Other Local Taxes, which represents 20.8% of the all funds budget. This category includes sales tax, franchise, utility, and business licenses taxes, as well transient occupancy tax. Transfers In From Other Funds (19.0%) represents the next largest revenue category, followed by Revenue from Other Agencies (16.0%) Charges for Services (14.7%), Property Taxes (145%), Other Revenue (11.3%), Use of Money (1.2%), Fines, Forfeitures, and Penalties (1.0%), Development Impact Fees (0.8%) and Licenses and Permits (0 7%). The combined expenditure budget for all City funds totals $298.9 million; $55.2 million represents interfund transfers. This amount includes a General Fund budget of $132.8 million and a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget of $30.4 million. Personnel Services (39.6%) represents the largest expenditure category, it includes funding for 1 ,005.0 positions in fiscal year 2009-10 budgeted in vari'ous funds. Transfers Out (18.5%) represents the next largest expenditure c'ategory followed by Services and Supplies (16.4%) Other Expenses (11.2%), Capital Improvement Project Expenditures (10.2%), Utilities (2.6%), Other Project Expenditures (0.9%), and Capital Expenses (0.6%) Total sources and uses of all City funds are summarized on the following two pages. ~6~ Sources of Funds Projected Revenues (In Thousands) Fiscal Year 2009-10 ""'OO!Eil!~J":i ;..... ,".',' 'ti'" ~:.~,~~'., Property Taxes $ 38,603 $ 43,100 $ 43,381 $ 41,925 $ 1,456 Other Local Taxes $ 53,438 $ 59,398 $ 53,723 $ 60,259 $ 6,536 Licenses and Permits $ 2,870 $ 2,768 $ 1,948 $ 2,029 $ 80 Fines, Forfeitures&Penalties $ 2,227 $ 2,672 $ 2,840 $ 3,048 $ 208 Use of Money $ 13,924 $ 17,769 $ 5,692 $ 3,384 $ 2,307 Rev. from Other Agencies $ 40,527 $ 50,384 $ 55,818 $ 46,345 $ (9,473 Charges for Services $ 48,112 $ 58,700 $ 46,871 $ 42,626 $ (4,245 Development Impact Fees $ 11,650 $ 5,637 $ 9,246 $ 2,271 $ (6,975 Other Revenue $ 62,221 $ 46,096 $ 33,404 $ 32,903 $ (501 Transfers In $ 53,901 $ 26,279 $ 36,687 $ 55,197 $ 18,511 Total All Funds Revenue $ 327,473 $ 312,803 $ 289,609 $ 289,988 $ 378 Total Revenues Fiscal Year 2009-10 Tranfers In 19% Property Taxes 14% Other Revenue 11% Other Local Taxes 21% Development Impact Fees 1% Licenses & Permits 1% Fines, Forf, Penalties :.---- 1% Other Agencies 16% \ l Use of $ and Prop 1% Charges for Svcs. 15% -7- Uses of Funds Operating Budget by Fund Type (In Thousands) Fiscal Year 2009-10 I,;i":,,. ......,.1:"..,. .,....2 ~.~ ..~. f?u{!I){!JlI& .< [j1fltIID'illl. '';C~i;;. ,;~, .rniij.~~ .,~'. Personnel Services $ 136,730 $ 134,311 $ 129,631 $ 118,357 $ 111,274) Supplies and Services $ 48,738 $ 51,198 $ 48,313 $ 49,114 $ 800 Other Expenses $ 63,726 $ 65,243 $ 40,586 $ 33,612 $ 16,974 Capital $ 2,587 $ 2,012 $ 2,558 $ 1,854 $ (704' Transfers Out $ 53,901 $ 26,279 $ 37,913 $ 55,197 $ 17,285 CIP Proiect Expenditures $ 36,619 S 31,709 S 25,617 $ 30,443 $ 4,826 Non-CIP Proiect Expenditures $ 775 $ 935 $ 2,300 $ 2,641 $ 341 Utilities $ 6,360 $ 6,281 $ 7,435 $ 7,728 $ 293 Net BudQet $ 349,437 $ 317,968 $ 294,354 $ 298,946 $ 4,592 Total Budget Fiscal Year 2009-10 Supplies and Services 16% Personnel Services 40% Other Expenses 11% Capital Expenses / (non CIP) 1% Transfers Out 18% Ut'I't' Other Project Illes . 3" Expenditures 10 1% CIP Project ---- Expenditures' 10% -8- The following table provides a summary by fund type of the projected revenues and expenditures for fiscal year 2009-10. Detailed descriptions, funding, and staffing levels are provided for each fund under the corresponding fund section in this document. As noted in the table below, the General Fund and Transit Fund are anticipated to be balanced in fiscal year 2009-10 with no impact to the reserves for these funds. The Sewer Fund and Development Services Fund are projected to increase their respective reserve balances while the Redevelopment Agency, Other Funds, Capital Project Funds, Debt Service Funds, and Fleet Management Funds are all anticipated to draw down reserves balances in fiscal year 2009-10 primarily due to loan repayments or use of capital project funds received in prior years. Summary of Net Impact to Reserves by Fund Fiscal Year 2009-10 (In Thousands) '=''''''''''''7''. " W:;~~~;~ "~f."'>-;q f?:'::ftll}t~L~'~}:;~;:, '""~'" ;:JT.'t,,,m=' >',J'~~" ~~ro<ilj. ".C:1l<liWii'lu:!) ';', General Fund $ 9,302 $ 132,844 $ 132,844 $ Develo ment Services Fund $ $ 5,858 $ 5,831 $ $ 6,189 $ 29,685 $ 30,487 $ Sewer Funds $ 54,457 $ 31,523 $ 29,261 $ Transit Funds $ 180 $ 1,738 $ 1,738 $ Other Funds $ 17,044 $ 45,707 $ 47,103 $ Ca ital Pro'eets Funds $ 56,967 $ 18,670 $ 27,372 $ Debt Service Funds $ 3,789 $ 19,973 $ 20,082 $ Fleet Mana ement $ 627 $ 3,988 $ 4,226 $ Total All Funds Bud et $ 140,976 $ 289,988 $ 298,946 $ Note; The Debt Service Funds carry a deficit that reflects lon9-term advances in Fund 451. $ 9,302 27 $ 27 802 $ 5,387 2,262 $ 56,719 $ 180 $ 15,648 $ 48,265 $ 3,898 $ 389 $ 132,018 .9. SUMMARY The proposed General Fund budget presented herein results in a balanced budget for fiscal year 2009- 10. However, due to the continued economic uncertainty I am continuing the hiring freeze to allow the City some flexibility to address unanticipated impacts that will minimize the potential for further layoffs. I recognize that the continuation of the hiring freeze will further impact service levels as fewer staff struggle to keep up with the service demands and expectations of a growing community however, I believe it is necessary given the economic uncertainty we are facing. A summary of the budget cuts that are anticipated to have the most significant impact on service levels is provided in this report. In closing, I want to reiterate my firm belief that despite our current budgetary challenges, the City of Chula Vista has a bright future. Chula Vista has several major economic development projects that put the City in a unique position of being able to pursue projects that will significantly expand the City's economic base. These projects include the Eastern Urban Center, the University Park and Research Center, and the development of the bay front. The implementation of the Budget Reduction Plan has resulted in some very difficult cuts which have an impact on service delivery. We are continuing to make changes citywide to ensure that we are working as efficiently as possible to deliver the best services we can with the resources we have available. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This document is the result of many months of effort on the part of all the members of this organization. Department Heads and their staff worked collaboratively with the Finance Department in preparing the recommendations contained within this document. Developing a fiscally sound budget that remains responsive to community needs and service expectations would not have been possible without their combined professionalism and teamwork. Respectfully submitted, James D. Sandoval City Manager -10- ECONOMIC OVERVIEW This section of the budget document identifies and outlines economic indicators that impact some of the City's major revenue projections. Several sources are used to forecast City revenues using national, state and local area economic trends. Sources include: the UCLA Anderson Forecast (National and State), U.S. Bureau of labor Statistics (National and San Diego region), California Department of Finance (State), and the University of San Diego Index of leading Economic Indicators (San Diego region) In December 2007, the naiional economy officially entered a recession, now projected to be the worse since 1929. This significant decline in economic activity has severely impacted all sectors including government agencies. In its first quarterly report of 2009, the UCLA Anderson Forecast linked the current national recession to slumping, international economic conditions that will impact the timing and pace of any national recovery. The Forecast asserts that a turnaround in the U.S. economy depends upon a recovery in world trade. The report also states that regardless of the steps taken by the U.S. government, national solutions will not be enough to restore grow1h and therefore global solutions are essential. In California,.it's forecasted that the economy will remain in turmoil for the foreseeable future as the twin sector engines of consumer and construction spending continue to drag. / '~'~~,~r---~'f ~ir.. .J'\R !'.....'t.....~\.\.f..<.'..' ,. ,', """\;''c?' r;\::r -:'-~-~fi\';? ;J"'~" ~';:::, )~1.I...,;\ .....' '.; " -11- The UCLA Anderson Forecast reports that real Growth Domestic Product (GDP) declined by 6.1 % in the fourth quarter of 2008 and foresees further declines of 6.8%, 4.5% and 1.7% in the first three quarters of 2009. As a result of the prolonged contraction, the nation's economy will likely lose 7.5 million jobs from its peak and unemployment will soar. UCLA Anderson Forecast predicts that the unemployment rate will peak at 10+% in mid-2010 and the employment recovery of the 2007-2009 recession will be "long and arduous. " Real Gross Domestic Product Growth I U.S. 200701 - 2009 01 percent change 6% ! ~~ l-IIIIIJlt-+",-~,J.I+=1 -2% ) ,4% j----- -6% ----"---"" -8% L_.. _~._,_ I .1.1.....'.'...1 _~1~ 200701 2007 03 2008 01 2008 03 2009 01 There are some positive signs, the Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index™, which had posted a slight increase in March, improved considerably in April. The Index now stands at 39,2, up from 26,9 in March, Consumer Confidence rose in April to its highest reading in 2009, driven primarily by a significant improvement in the short-term outlook, The Present Situation Index posted a moderate gain, a sign that conditions have not deteriorated further, and may even moderately improve, in the second quarter. The sharp increase in the Expectations Index suggests that consumers believe the economy is nearing a bottom, however, this Index still remains well below levels associated with strong economic growth, The U,S, Census Bureau estimates U,S retail sales for March, decreased by 1,1 percent from the previous month and 9.4 percent below March 2008, Total sales for the January through March 2009 period were down 8 8 percent from the same period a year ago, As stated by the UCLA Anderson Forecast, "the California economy has experienced a deeper downturn than the U,S, economy, Unemployment hit 11,2% in March and a further increase is expected in April. The rapid rise in unemployment is expected to abate as we move through 2009, The March forecast is for unemployment to reach a maximum of 11,9% and to stay in double digits through the forecast horizon of 2011 ," -12- The continued negative trends in employment numbers and the decline in housing values have created a negative impact on property taxes for state and local governments as well as other municipalities and school districts. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has indicated that the state is i! i i i i i i i i ! i i i currently facing the potential for a twenty one billion dollar budget deficit in fiscal year 2009-10. The downturn in the economy and the crisis in the housing market has lead to a severe financial crisis at the State level. The City of Chula Vista felt the effects of the recession ~ ~A earlier than most agencies primarily due to the rapid residential growth experienced during the past six years and the effects of the foreclosure crisis, which eventually spread across the Country. The University of San Diego's Index of Leading Economic Indicators for San Diego County fell 2.2 percent in March 2009. All six components in the Index, which include building permits, unemployment insurance, stock prices, consumer confidence, help wanted advertising and the national economy, were down at the end of March. The largest decline occurred in help wanted advertising (-4.65%) followed by sharp declines in consumer confidence (-3.27%) and unemployment insurance (-2.31 %). The USD Index has now fallen in 35 of the last 36 months. It was also the sixth month in a row that the Index declined by more than two percent, which corresponds to the six largest drops on record. The bad job growth numbers for February 2009 got worse in March 2009, with Sari Diego County losing more than 44,000 jobs compared to the year before Both the national and local economies are caught in a vicious cycle where job losses are reducing incomes, which reduces consumption, auto sales, and home sales, which in turn leads to even more job losses. ~v~ ~ C"~,m'. T~,. ~"orl".m Cal,f,,,,.. ___Soo'hOm c.,,,,,,,,,. _C~n".' Vall&y _c...p't., ,.. _c",," 150.0 145.0 140.0 135.0 130.0 125.0 . 120.0 . 115.0 . 110.0 105.0 100.0 95.0 Jan-03 Jan-Q4 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-OB Jan-09 San Diego Index of Leadin Economic Indicators '" ~ ."t '''''",,''',l "'''l.''''-', . , -13- In 2003, based on population estimates released by the Census Bureau, Chula Vista was identified as the 7th fastest growing city in the United States. The growth continued through 2006. By mid-2007 the mortgage crisis came to light and the City began experiencing a significant number of foreclosures. According to UCLA Anderson Forecast San Diego County Economic Outlook For 2009 Report, "Escondido and Chula Vista had the highest foreclosure rates at 13.4 and 12.4 foreclosures per 1,000 homes, respectively. Rates offoreclosures peaked in most areas sometime between October and December of 2008. All regions have shown declines in the rate of foreclosures between December 2008 and May 2009. " The Anderson forecast states that based on information received for the first three months of 2009, the bottom may have been reached in San Diego County. Foreclosures are having a significant negative impact on property tax revenues by depressing housing values. The drop in assessed values has triggered Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment passed in 1978 that allows a temporary reduction in assessed value when real property suffers a "decline-in-value". Therefore, as assessed values fall, homeowners can apply for a reassessment of their homes which would lead to a reduction of property taxes based on the lower assessment. A comparison of sales data for March 2008 to March 2009 reveals that prices have dropped dramatically from March 2008 levels. Recent sales data indicates that the median price drops range as high as 46.4 percent in the hardest hit areas of the City. Many of these downward reassessments may not yet appear on property tax bills requiring further adjustments to the fiscal outlook beyond fiscal year 2009-10. :;'; ;;;:.,U",' Mediari:'p,ric'e!'.;;:._; ." .2009~~ .' r~gt2008 $ 250,000 $ 330,000 $165,000 $ 308,000 $310,000 $391,000 $ 387,500 $ 496,000 $ 344,000 $ 391 ,500 , ~~ic;ent.,. . Ch,m' at -24.2% -46.4% -20.7% -219% -12.1% Zi 91910 91911 91913 91914 91915 North South Eastlaka NE SE Source: San Diego Union -14- SUMMARY OF BUDGET REDUCTIONS Since 2007 the City has gone through several budget reduction processes in an effort to keep expenditures in line with rapidly declining revenues. As discussed previously in this document, City revenues have been severely impacted by the slowdown in development, plummeting home values, a dramatic increase in foreclosures, and the national recession. In November 2008, staff informed the City Council of a projected $4.0 million budget deficit for fiscal year 2008-09 that was anticipated to grow to $20.0 million in fiscal year 2009-1 O. After a series of public meetings where Council considered the budget reduction plan, the City Council approved a mid-year budget reduction plan on January 13, 2009. The budget reduction plan reduced the City's annual net cost by $20.0 million and resulted in the elimination of over one hundred positions. These reductions are reflected in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget and impact all General Fund departments as well as the Redevelopment Agency and Development Services Fund. The budget reduction plan that was originally presented to Council included the elimination of 166.5 positions, however 49.0 positions were reinstated due to the elimination or deferral of the cost of living adjustments scheduled for January 2009 and January 2010 for the Chula Vista Employees Association, Police Officers Association, Western Council of Engineers, International Association of Firefighters, confidential and management employees. The plan was further amended as alternative sources of . . . funding, such as economic stimulus and grant funds, became available and positions were restored. In total 1 00.5 positions were eliminated from the fiscal year 2009-1 0 proposed budget. The following table summarizes the staffing reductions that are reflected in the fiscal year 2009-10 budget as well as the staffing reductions that have been made since fiscal year 2006-07 through other budget reduction processes by fund and department. -15- Summary of Staffing Changes by Department/Fund Redevelopment 14.00 (4.00) (500) (9.00) -64% Recreation & Nature Center 43.25 (4.75) (1350) (18.25) -42% Planning & Building 9150 (33.00) (5.50) (38.50) -42% Library 68.75 (1800) (10.50) (2850) -41% Administration 28.00 (2.00) (900) (11.00) -39% Human Resources 25.50 (5.00) (450) (9.50) -37% Engineering 74.00 (2150) (4.00) (2550) -34% Finance 33.50 (8.00) (3.00) (11.00) -33% ITS 28.00 (4.00) (500) (9.00) -32% City Attorney 14.00 (2.00) (2.00) (4.00) -29% City Clerk 850 (1.00) (100) (2.00) -24% Public Works 260 00 (1850) (23.50) (42.00) -16% City Council 1500 (1.00) (1.00) (2.00) -13% Fire 152.00 (17.00) (17.00) -11% Police 364.50 (25.00) (13.00) (38.00) -10% Animal Shelter 22.25 (2.00) (2.00) -9% CBAG 17.00 3.00 3.00 18% Housing 4.00 3.00 300 75% CITYWIDE TOTAL 1,263.75 (160.75) (100.50) (261.25) -21% Notes: Staffin9 totals for FY 2006-07 have been adjusted to reflect current program structures. Staffing figures for Public Works include positions budgeted in the General Fund, Development Services Fund, Fleet, Environmental Services, Transit, and Sewer funds. Staffing figures for Engineering include positions budgeted in the General Fund, Development Services Fund, and Sewer funds. Staffing figures for Planning and Building include positions budgeted in the General Fund and Development Services Fund. The table above shows that the largest percentage reduction was made in the Redevelopment Agency (64%). The next largest staffing reductions were made in the Recreation Department (42%), which reflects the elimination of the Nature Center, followed by the Planning and BuildinglDevelopment Services Fund (42%) and the Library Department (41 %). The smallest staffing reductions were made in Police (10%), Fire (11 %), and City Council (13%). The Fire Department reductions include the elimination of 11 Fire Dispatch positions. Fire dispatch services are now contracted from the City of San Diego. Excluding. the transition of Fire Dispatch, Fire Department staffing has been reduced by 4%. The City of Chula Vista serves as a fiscal agent for the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG), which is fully revenue offset. The increase in staffing in the Chula Vista Housing Authority reflects the transfer of staff from the former Community Development Department. -16- The following table summarizes the staffing reductions by bargaining unit or employee group. The management and professional group experienced the largest percentage reduction in staffing - Senior Managers decreased by 40%, Executive Managers decreased by 36%, Middle Managers decreased by 33%, and Professional employees decreased by 32%. The next highest percentage reduction was in the Chula Vista Employees' Association (CVEA), which was reduced by 25%. CVEA is the largest of the City's six collective bargaining units and experienced the largest reduction in the number of positions at 154.75. The smallest percent reductions are in public safety. The Chula Vista Police Officers' Association (POA) has been reduced by 14 positions or 6% and the International Association of Firefighters Local 2180 (IAFF) has been reduced by one position or 1 %. Summary of Staffing Changes by Bargaining Unit SENIOR MANAGERS EXECUTIVES MID MANAGERS PROFESSIONALS CVEA WCE CONF POA IAFF MAYOR & COUNCIL CITYWIDE TOTAL 48.00 25.00 64.00 85.50 609.25 3700 31.00 247.00 112.00 5.00 1,263.75 (8.00) (4.00) (16.00) (14.00) (99.75) (7.00) (4.00) (7.00) (1.00) (160.75) (11.00) (5.00) (500) (13.50) (55.00) (2.00) (200) (700) (100.50) (19.00) (900) (21.00) (2750) (154.75) (9.00) (6.00) (1400) (1.00) -40% -36% -33% -32% -25% -24% -19% -6% -1% 0% -21% (261.25) A list of the 100.5 positions eliminated through this budget reduction process can be found in the Summary of Staffing Changes section. SUMMARY OF SERVICE IMPACTS The development and implementation of the budget reduction plan was a major undertaking that will have many impacts on services to the community and City operations. To follow is a summary of some of the more significant budget reductions reflected in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget. The City's net cost were reduced by $20.0 million through the implementation of the budget reduction plan and the deferral or elimination of the cost of living adjustments scheduled for January 2009 and January 2010. This list is not all-inclusive but is meant to highlight some of the reductions that were necessary in order to balance the budget. -17- . Reduced staffing and other expenses in City Council Department - During the Council deliberations of the budget reduction plan, City Council identified reductions in the City Council budget that included the elimination of the Coastal and Environmental Policy Consultant position, the elimination of the Chief of Staff, the addition of a Senior Council Assistant and a reduction to the department's services and supplies budget . Reduced Recreation Services - The budget reduction plan includes the elimination of 13.5 positions from the Recreation Department To follow is a summary of the service impacts of these reductions by program: o Program Services - Eliminated diversionary programs and activities for middle school at- risk youth, potentially resulting in increased contacts with law enforcement. Significant reduction in public service levels at Norman Park Center; eliminated some senior and low- income programs such as blood pressure screenings. Eliminated the Information and Referral services at Norman Park Center, a diversified program that helped hundreds of seniors find assistance for housing, nutritional, financial, and other issues, as well as crisis intervention. Reduced funding in the Recreation Department also resulted in the elimination of the Therapeutics program. Developmentally and physically disabled clients may be unable to participate in certain programs due to transportation issues; these individuals require highly specialized programming that may not be available elsewhere locally. Recreation centers will be closed on Sunday, with the exception of Parkway Gym, there has also been a reduction or elimination of some drop-in and fee-free activities at recreation centers o Nature Center - The Nature Center is scheduled to close in July 2009 to the public. Staff continues to work with the Friends of the Nature Center to transition the operation of the Nature Center to a non-profit organization. The fiscal year 2009-1 0 budget includes limited funding to maintain operations at the Nature Center until it transitions to a non-profit in January 2010. o Administration - Administrative and supervisory responsibilities are being transferred to other areas, non-core functions will be deferred, and departmental representation in numerous community collaborative efforts will be eliminated. -18- . Reduced Library Services - The budget reduction plan includes the elimination of 10.5 positions from the Library Department. These staffing reductions impact Library Operations and the STRETCH and DASH programs, the service impacts are described below: o Branch Operations - The reduction in staffing in Library Operations will result in reduced hours of operation at all three branch libraries - in total, the hours of operation will be reduced by 26 hours per week. Due to the staffing changes this service model requires, the new hours of operation will be implemented in July 2009. In addition to reduced hours of operation, there has also been a reduction in funding for library resources and materials. Reduced funding also results in a significant reduction in programming, such as story times, foreclosure workshops, arts exhibits, classical guitar performances, and film festivals. Public outreach (community events, fliers, posters, news releases, calendars) will be limited. o Transfer of STRETCH and DASH programs - As a result of the transfer of the STRETCH and DASH programs to the YMCA the City will no longer operate the 7 STRETCH and 22 DASH sites. This eliminates 5.0 permanent positions and over 150 part-time hourly employees. . Reduced Public Works Services - As part of the reorganizations put in place during fiscal year 2008-09, the Engineering Department was dissolved with most sections being merged with the Public Works Department. This reorganization resulted in the elimination of the Director of Engineering, an executive management position. In total, the Public Works Department (including Engineering) staffing has been reduced by 24.5 positions. Reductions in this department include the following: o Construction and Repair Program - Eliminating five positions eliminates painting, stucco and drywall repairs for City buildings. It will also delay responses to complaints and electrical repairs (most notably those associated with exposed wiring or copper wire thefts throughout the City). o Traffic Signal and Street Light Program - The elimination of a position in this program impacts preventative maintenance (PM) for traffic signals citywide. PM's benefit the City in the long-term by reducing maintenance costs. This cut may result in a potential increase in malfunctions of traffic signals, thereby causing traffic congestion and delays. -19- o Street Maintenance Program - In fiscal year 2000-01, six positions were added to the Street Maintenance Program to catch up with providing street maintenance services citywide. Since that time, the city's streets (lanes) have increased by 224 miles or 25%. In December of 2007, two positions were eliminated due to budget reductions. With the most current reduction of three positions, five of the six staff added in fiscal year 2000-01 would be eliminated. Overall, street reconstruction will be reduced by 50%. Backlogs for litter and trash pickup will increase resulting in a negative appearance of the City. o Urban Forestry Program - Eliminating one position increases delays in clearing right-of- way obstructions and other tree related concerns. Some of these impacts include reductions in trimming, planting and root pruning of trees. Furthermore, the trimming of young trees will be eliminated. o Storm Drain Program - The five positions designated for elimination were approved in fiscal year 2007-08 to help the City comply with the new NPDES permit. The increased requirements with regard to NPDES were imposed by the State without providing the necessary funding. The new NPDES Permit requires inspection and cleaning of trash and debris from the City's storm drainage systems, including catch basins, storm drain inlets, open channels, culverts, detention basins, etc. Non-compliance could potentially result in notices of violation and fines. o NPDES Program - The eliminated Stormwater Compliance Inspector helped the City comply with the new NPDES permit. The Municipal Permit requires the City to implement various program components to minimize the discharge of pollutants from construction, residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal activities to the receiving waters of the State. o Park Maintenance Program - In fiscal year 2007-08, the Parks Division had 7 gardener positions eliminated due to budget reductions. The current budget cuts include eliminating 2 additional gardener positions, raising the total number of gardener positions cut to 9. This means that 9 of 10 gardeners added since fiscal year 2000-01 to maintain the new parks will have been cut. At the same time, the City has moved forward with the development of a new community park in San Miguel Ranch. Upon its completion, service levels at other parks will further degrade as we account for this increased workload. -20- o Traffic Division - This division traditionally covers about 47% of its work from various dedicated accounts. With the most current staffing, the service impacts include a reduction of speed surveys, accident investigations, and support for the traffic safety commission. In addition, there is no funding anticipated for traffic related public inquiries and council referrals including: traffic calming, signing and striping, parking, and sight distance. . Reduced Police Staffing - The Police Department has made every effort to minimize the service level impacts to the citizens of Chula Vista. Through the use of grant funds or moving officers into task force positions that receive funding from non-general fund sources, the department has been able to mitigate significant service impacts over the last couple offiscal years. While these funding sources will provide a temporary solution to the low staffing issues, long-term solutions need to be identified to prevent further erosion to staffing levels throughout one of the City's most core functions. In total 13.0 positions have been eliminated from the Police Department in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget, with an additional 4.0 positions being frozen. Although these frozen positions have not been eliminated from the department, the service impacts will remain since there will be four fewer officers in the field. The impact of the budget cuts result in moderate to significant reductions in many areas of service including: Direct Services, Investigative Services, Police Support Services, and Community Relations/Outreach. The Police Department is actively pursuing several grant funding opportunities through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act program from the Federal Government. Most of these grant funds are competitive in nature and there are no assurances that Chula Vista will receive the amount of money required to help reduce the service level impacts of the current proposed cuts, or those that were taken in previous years. o Direct Service - Direct service impacts include the elimination of the patrol Community Service Officer Program. This will delay response to priority calls, especially at the priority one and two response thresholds. With the elimination of the CSO program in Patrol, approximately 4,000 or more reports will be redirected to sworn officers which will divert them to low priority report calls thus delaying response times to other higher priority calls. By holding one of the K-9 positions vacant, the total elimination of the patrol K-9 program has been avoided at this time. The salary savings gained as a result of freezing one of the vacant K-9 positions will allow the Police Department to continue with a minimally staffed K- 9 presence, although there will be significant gaps in coverage which will still likely cause -21- increased response times and additional liability concerns. K-9's are instrumental in resolving many situations quickly and safely because of the training of the police dog. The elimination of the Commercial Enforcement Officer will impact the department's ability to ensure that the commercial vehicles/trucks that traverse the City are safe and abide by motor vehicle laws. Additionally, three peace officer positions in the Patrol Division will be frozen instead of eliminated. The effect of having three frozen positions will still impact response times. These reductions in actual sworn staff in the field will mean longer response times and potentially higher overtime usage to cover minimum staffing requirements should any increases in retirements or injuries occur in patrol. o Investigative Services -Investigative Services will be impacted significantly. Specialized detectives will be eliminated including the Computer Forensic Agent, Financial Crimes Agent, and Auto Theft Agent. The Computer Forensic Agent handled very technical investigations involving the use of computers. Often times, detectives find computers at a crime scene which may contain evidence and the Computer Forensic Agent was called in to secure any data on the disk, or to remove data from damaged or unreadable media. With the loss of this position, the City could incur substantial costs to send out to a third party computer forensic lab. Financial crimes are the fastest growing crime in the United States. Due to the nature of the investigations and the complexity of the cases, specialized training is required to work these cases. Auto theft represents 50% of the City's Part I crime totals. A trained auto theft detective is imperative to work the over 2,400 cases received each year. General detectives will now review any cases involving financial crimes or auto theft. Overall, staffing in the Investigative Services Division will be the same as it was back in the 1980's when the City's population was around 100,000 citizens. Most cases without any suspect information will unfortunately go uninvestigated unless any reliable leads are found. o Support - The fiscal year 2009-10 budget includes the elimination of several support positions that playa critical part in the day-to-day operations of the Police Department. The Community Service Officer in the Family Protection Unit registers and tracks sex offenders in Chula Vista. There.are over 300 documented sex offenders in Chula Vista and this position tracks their location and liaisons with various law enforcement and court related agencies to ensure these offenders are registered and their location in our city is known. This function will now be handled by a detective, which will reduce the amount of time that detective can spend dealing with sex crimes, domestic/elder abuse and other family crimes. -22- There are also two juvenile programs that are contracted through South Bay Community Services that help identify troubled youth and put them back on track to be contributing members of the community. With an over 98% success rate (based upon recidivism rates), these programs are essential in reducing crimes involving youth. The Police Training Manager was originally included in the budget reduction plan but the elimination of this position jeopardizes the departments' ability to maintain the high levels of training that significantly reduce liability and improve officer skill levels. The department will utilize one-time grant funds to retain this position, although these grant funds will only be able to maintain this position for FY 2010. This position has been eliminated from the General Fund and added to the Police Grants Fund. The additional elimination of the Police Agent in the Backgrounds unit will result in slower recruitment times for new officers, which could result in understaffing conditions in the Patrol unit. This becomes critical as the officer per thousand ratio for the department continues to drop to almost one officer per thousand residents (the lowest in San Diego County). It is anticipated that the department will see increased response times much as it did back in 2005 when there were significant gaps between the authorized number of sworn officers and the actual number of sworn officers in the field. Finally, a Latent Print Examiner position has also been eliminated which will cause significant delays in the processing of fingerprints from crime scenes. This potentially could cause suspects to go free or significantly delay prosecution because of the long delay in the examination of fingerprint evidence. o Community Relations - The entire Community Relations Unit, including the supervisor (from previous cuts in FY2008, Sergeant), Peace Officer and two civilian positions have been eliminated from the General Fund. The Community Relations Unit is the vital link between the Police Department and the community. This will significantly impact the department's ability to respond to community concerns in a timely manner. Programs such . as Neighborhood Watch, Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, Crime Free Multi-family Housing Certification, and attendance at neighborhood/civic meetings will be eliminated. Additionally, responses to inquiries regarding police services will be significantly delayed as well as a reduction of timely information available to the news media. The use of the Community Meeting Room will be restricted to normal operating hours as there will be -23- no staff available for after hours meetings. The Department is reinstating the PIO and one Police Community Relations Specialist in the Police Grant Fund through new grant funding from the Federal Government as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act program. This funding will only carry these positions for two years, and then the department will need to find additionally funding or eliminate the program entirely. Despite being able to save these two positions, service to the community will be greatly reduced. . Cross Staffing of Urban Search and Rescue - This budget reduction designates the four positions per day that staff the urban search and rescue vehicle (USAR 53) at Fire Station Three as supplemental staffing by eliminating USAR 53 from continuous service and placing it at Station Seven to be "cross staffed" with personnel from Truck 57. These four positions will be used to backfill daily vacancies that occur at other fire stations within the department. This will result in savings from not having to pay overtime to backfill for vacancies due to leave. The elimination of USAR 53 from continuous service results in decreased specialized rescue capabilities and coverage. The Station Seven district will not have an apparatus with fire attack capabilities and therefore initiating an attack on fires will be delayed. Residents may be affected with potential increased response times, because an extra unit will be required on structure fires. Residents of the eastern territories will be impacted to a larger extent because the proposed staffing decrease will affect Station Seven that is located in the eastern section of the city. Response times may also increase, as second and third calls for service will take longer to respond to due to one less unit being available for coverage. . Reduced Development Services - As part of the reorganizations put in place during fiscal year 2008-09, the Planning and Building Department, Redevelopment Agency, Housing Authority, Economic Development and the Development Services Fund were all put under the direction of the Deputy City Manager/Development Services. The staffing reductions for this group include the elimination of 6.5 positions from the Development Services Fund, 5 0 positions from the Redevelopment Agency, and 2.0 positions from Planning & Building. Reductions in this section include the following: o Redevelopment Agency - The State of California, (n fiscal years 2004-2005, 2005-2006 and 2008-2009 required the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency to shift tax increment revenues to the State Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF). For fiscal year 2004-2005 and fiscal year 2005-2006, the Agency borrowed funds from the California Statewide Communities Development Authority to make its ERAF payments. Financing the -24- fiscal years 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 ERAF shifts was necessary to maintain funding for ongoing redevelopment projects. To make its fiscal year 2008-2009 ERAF payment, the Agency eliminated existing vacancies as well as delayed redevelopment and capital improvement projects. The elimination of five positions from the Redevelopment Agency makes a structural change that allows the Agency to handle additional ERAF shifts or increase the loan repayment to the General Fund. o Development Services Fund - The elimination of 6.5 positions from the Development Services Fund negatively impacts the department's level of effort in - timely research and retrieval of building records and response to Public Records Act requests, meeting established performance goals for project reviews and next day inspections, providing expeditious resolution to conflicts arising in the building plan check and inspection process, and providing policy and code recommendations to City Council on building construction matters (e.g. Green Building standards, accessibility). o Advanced Planning - Two positions were eliminated from the Advanced Planning division. The loss of these positions negatively impacts the department's level of effort in seeking financial resources for implementation of Otay Valley Regional Park, adoption and implementation of the Historic Preservation program, timely review of development projects for General Plan consistency and for sites with historic resources, timely processing of applications for historic designations, and loss of clerical support for Advance Planning and GMOC. o Code Enforcement - The budget reduction plan includes the transfer of one Code Enforcement Officer from the Sign Enforcement Program to the Residential Abandoned Property Program resulting in the elimination of the Sign Eriforcement Program. o Reduced Economic Development funding - As part of the budget-balancing plan, the City eliminated support to outside economic development organizations at the local, regional and state level; including the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, San Diego Connect, and Team California. The fiscal year 2009-10 budget also reflects a . -- reduction in funding for the South County Economic Development Council. Eliminating the support to these non-profits reduces or eliminates each organization's ability and incentive to promote Chula Vista, represent the City's interests and refer business development leads to the City. -25- . Reduced Administration staffing - As part of the cost cutting efforts put in place during fiscal year 2008-09 the Administration department was reorganized. The Office of Budget and Analysis and Economic Development were transferred to the Finance and Planning and Building departments respectively. The Administration department was further reorganized to combine Communications into the City Manager's Office. The reorganization of the Administration Department resulted in the elimination of two executive management positions. Excluding the transfers, 9.0 positions have been eliminated from Administration; these reductions included the following: o City Manager's Office - The elimination of two management positions in the City Manager's Office resulted in the elimination of the City's legislative analysis and governmental relations program and shifted the duties related to coordinating the agenda process to the City Clerk's Office. One administrative support position was also eliminated from the City Manager's Office. o Office of Communications - As mentioned above, the Office of Communications has been merged with the City Manager's Office. This transition allowed for the elimination of one executive management position. The Graphic Designer was also eliminated from Communications. The reduction in staffing severely limits the City's public information and media relations efforts, eliminates its photography, video production and virtual tour capability. The CV Connect will be discontinued from publication and the City's website will be updated less frequently. . Reduced Information Technology Services - Reduced funding for the Information Technology Department results in the elimination of 5.0 positions and reduces the funding available for computer replacement. o Reduced ITS staffing - The elimination of two microcomputer/network support professionals increases the resolution times for non-critical support issues from 1-2 days to 2-3 days on average. These positions also handled all of the network-related calls for service from the users and responded to support calls for Police dispatch, Fire related calls and for the Library. The elimination of one of four application support positions results in programming delays - mostly in the area of Permits Plus, Business License processing, and custom applications for the Police Department. One of two Webmaster positions was also eliminated; the elimination of this position delays the rollout of additional e-government applications. The ITS department also lost its clerical support position. -26- o Reduced Computer Replacement Funding - The annual computer replacement fund has been reduced or eliminated for the past several years. The City has computers that are as slow as 1 GHZ single core processors and more than 6 years old still in use. These computers will not be replaced unless they completely fail to operate or are so slow that they become unusable. . Reduced Human Resources Services - The elimination of 4.5 positions in the Human Resources department impacts the Operations, Risk Management, and Benefits divisions. o Operations - Staff in this division has absorbed the workload of four positions cut through previous budget reduction processes. The further reduction in staffing results in delays in the delivery of services such as the recruitment and testing of safety and civilian positions and delays in providing benefit and payroll support to the remaining workforce. Over the past eight years the City has spent a significant amount of time and resources to align the classification and compensation structure - the citywide reorganization and reassignment of duties as a result of the budget and program reductions will require the city to spend the same amount of time and effort to ensure the new city structure meets FLSA guidelines and is fair and equitable in order to avoid a wide array of employment liability issues. o Risk Management - The loss of a Senior Risk Management Specialist (Safety) results in city and community wide impacts as it limits the City's ability to address safety issues on a proactive preventative basis. The loss of a Senior Risk Management Specialist (Loss Control) limits the City's ability to pursue financial restitution from parties who have damaged city property or who have tied up police and fire resources as a result of alcohol related accidents. Collection efforts will be limited to insured parties only. o Employee Benefits -The staffing reductions in this division result in delays in processing bi- weekly payroll transactions, including benefits and MOU related matters; it also limits the City's ability to identify and implement benefit options that could result in cost savings. . Reduced Finance Services - Staffing reductions in the FinanceDepartment have resulted in an overall 33% decrease in staffing in this department. Previous reductions have impacted the Administrative, Operations and Treasury divisions; further staffing reductions in these areas would inhibit the City's ability to meet annual reporting deadlines and continue to be in compliance with Federal, State, and Local financial reporting deadlines. The current reduction of 3.0 positions -27- impacts the Purchasing division and Accounts Payable. o Purchasing - The elimination of the Purchasing Agent and Procurement Specialist increases the time to review and approve contracts, issue formal bids, process requisitions, and process payments to vendors. o Accounts Payable - A vacant Accounting Assistant position has also been eliminated from the Operations division, which required the reallocation of workload to existing staff. This shift in workload results in delays in processing vendor payments in a timely manner. o Budget and Analysis - During fiscal year 2008-09 the Office of Budget & Analysis was consolidated with the Finance Department, resulting in the elimination of the Director of Budget and Analysis, an executive management position. Other staffing reductions in this division included the elimination of the Special Projects Manager position (formerly Grants Manager position), which negatively impacts the number of grant proposals written and received as well as the City's ability to pursue potential new sources of revenues including impact fees and user fees. The elimination of a budget analyst position negatively impacts the quality of budget services provided to departments, the City Manager, the City Council and Citizens. . Reduced City Clerk staffing - Past budget reductions have resulted in delays in meeting state mandates, such as campaign statement review, fulfillment of requests for records and information; and in preparing City Council minutes. The elimination of the Assistant City Clerk will cause continued delays in providing these services. . Reduced City Attorney staffing - The elimination of two positions eliminates specialized legal expertise in certain areas induding redevelopment, employment, ADA, conflicts and labor law. The elimination of attorney and support staff positions will result in extended legal project completion time and will eliminate the department's ability to perform non-essential projects. The downgrading of two positions reduces the experience and expertise level of attorneys providing advice and support. Potential increase in the use of outside counsel may be required for projects requiring specialized legal knowledge or projects constrained by time sensitive requirements. -28- SUMMARY OF STAFFING CHANGES The proposed fiscal year 2009-10 budget includes 1,005 positions for all funds. This is a net decrease of 104.5 from the fiscal year 2008-09 Council adopted budget authorized position count of 1,109.5. The section that follows is divided into two sections - the staffing changes that have already been approved by Council during fiscal year 2008-09 and changes being implemented as part of the fiscal year 2009-10 budget. POSITION CHANGES AUTHORIZED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 On September 9, 2008 Council approved the implementation of a budget reduction plan for the Development Services Fund (DSF), which resulted in the elimination of 85 positions and the transfer of 2.0 positions from the DSF to the General Fund. During fiscal year 2008-09, Council also approved the addition of a grant funded position to the Police Department. The final position added mid-year was the reinstatement of an Information Technology Support Specialist, as authorized by Council. The table on the following pages summarizes the position changes Council authorized during fiscal year 2008-09, including the positions eliminated as part of the budget reduction plan approved on September 9, 2008. Information Technology Services (1.0) Planning & Building (2.0) Police (1.0) Microcomputer Support Information Technology Support Specialist 100 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officer 2.00 Traffic Operations Police Agent 100 -29- Development Services Fund-Planning & Building (-10.5) Planning Administration Community Planning Plan Review Building Field Inspection PSB Front Counter Reclassification - Community Planning Reclassification - Development Planning Reclassification - Plan Review Assistant Director of Planning Associate Planner Plans Examiner Building Inspector II Development Services Counter Manager Development Services Technician II Development Services Technician III Principal Planner Senior Planner Senior Planner Associate Planner Senior Plans Examiner Plans Examiner -100 -2.00 -1.00 -2.00 -100 -2.50 -100 -1.00 1.00 -1.00 100 -100 1.00 PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 CHANGES In developing the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget, the City went through a budget reduction process in order to address projected budgetary gaps resulting from a continued slowdown in the economy and a deteriorating housing market. Council reviewed the proposed budget reductions in a series of workshops in December 2008 and January 2009, and as a result 100.5 positions are proposed for elimination. In addition, the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget reflects a number of reorganizations in order to reduce costs and/or to improve operational efficiency. Lastly, the proposed fiscal year 2009-10 budget includes a number of reclassifications and staffing enhancements requested in conjunction with the normal budget development process. In total, these department requested staffing modifications result in a net increase of 2.5 FTE. Budqet Reductions As mentioned above, in developing the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget additional reductions were needed in the General Fund, Redevelopment Agency, and the Development Services Fund in order to bring expenditures in line with revenues. A total of 100.50 positions are being eliminated from the budget. The table below summarizes the staffing changes reflected in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget. Mayor & Council (-1.0) Mayor & Council Reclassification Coastal Environmental Policy Consultant Chief of Staff Senior Council Assistant 11;_.. City Clerk's Office (-1.0) Operations Assistant City Clerk -1.00 -30- Administration Executive Assistant -1.00 Litigation Deputy City Attorney III -100 City Attorney's Office Reclassification - Deputy City Attorney III -100 (-2.0) Administration Deputy City Attorney II 1.00 Reclassification - Senior Assistant City Attorney -100 Administration Assistant City Attorney 1.00 Executive Assistant to the City Manager -1.00 City Manager's Office Government Relations Liaison -1.00 Administrative Secretary -1.00 Office of Communications Graphic Designer -100 Administration Director of Communications -100 (-9.0) Reclassification - Office of Special Events Planner -1.00 Communications Communications Coordinator 100 Director of Budget & Analysis -100 Office of Budget & Analysis Principal Management Analyst -1.00 Senior Management Analyst -1.00 Special Projects Manager -1.00 Administration Administrative Secretary -100 Information Information Technology Support Specialist -2.00 Technology Services Technology Support & (-50) Administration Webmaster -1.00 Senior Application Support Specialist -100 Human Resources Assistant Director of Human Resources -1.00 Operations Fiscal Office Specialist -0.50 Human Resources Reclassification - Human Principal HR Analyst -1.00 (-4.5) Resources Operations Senior H R Analyst 1.00 Loss Control Senior Risk Management Specialist -100 Benefits Administration Benefits Technician -1.00 Safety Senior Risk Management Specialist -1.00 Finance Purchasing Procurement Specialist -100 (-3.0) Purchasing Agent -100 Operations Accounting Assistant -1.00 Planning & Building Advance Planning Senior Planner -1.00 (-2.0) Secretary -100 Finance & Administration Director of Engineering/City Engineer -1.00 Engineering Senior Office Specialist -1.00 (-2.5) Building & Park Construction Landscape Planner 1/11 1.00 Landscape Architect -0.50 Real Property Senior Civil Engineer -100 Community Patrol Community Service Officer -3.00 Police Agent -1.00 Tr8ffic Operations Peace Officer -1.00 Police(-13.0) Office Specialist -100 Street Team/Gang Peace Officer -1.00 Suppression Community Relations Police Community Relations Specialist -100 Peace Officer -1.00 -31- Property Crimes Community Service Officer -1.00 Police Agent -2.00 Police Professional Standards Police Agent -1.00 (cont) Forensic Services Latent Print Examiner -1.00 Resource Management Principal Management Analyst 100 Administration Parks & Open Space Manager -1.00 Infrastructure Maintenance Public Works Manager -1.00 Admin Signing & Striping Maintenance Worker I1II -1.00 Equipment Operator -1.00 Street Maintenance Maintenance Worker 1111 -1.00 Senior Maintenance Worker -1.00 Urban Forestry Tree Trimmer -1.00 Public Works Storm Drain Maintenance Maintenance Worker 1111 -3.00 (-22.0) Senior Maintenance Worker -2.00 Electrician -100 Building Maintenance HVAC Technician -1.00 Painter -2.00 Senior Electrician -1.00 Custodian Services Custodian -100 Traffic Devices Traffic Devices Technician -1.00 Parks Maintenance Gardener 1111 -2.00 Stormwater Compliance Stormwater Compliance Inspector 1111 -1.00 Administration Assistant Director of Recreation -1.00 Senior Recreation Manager -1.00 Therapeutics Recreation Supervisor II -1.00 Middle School Program Recreation Supervisor II -1.00 Administrative Secretary -100 Recreation Aquarist -0.75 (-135) NC Grounds Maintenance Worker -1.00 Nature Center NC Maintenance Specialist -1.00 Registered Veterinary Technician -0.75 Senior Office Specialist -100 Nature Center Programs Manager -300 Parkway Recreation Center Recreation Supervisor III -100 Administration Assistant Library Director -1.00 Collection Development Delivery Driver -0.50 Literacy Literacy & Programming Coordinator -100 Reclassification - Civic Librarian II -100 Center Branch Operations Librarian III 1.00 Library(-10.5) South Chula Vista Branch Senior Office SpeCialist -1.00 Operations Principal Librarian -100 Library Programs Senior Librarian -1.00 Educational Services Supervisor -300 STRETCH and DASH Senior Educational Services Supervisor -1.00 Senior Office Specialist -1.00 -32- Development Services Fund-Planning & Building (-3.5) Development Services Fund-Engineering -2.0 Development Services Fund-Public Works (-1.0) Redevelopment (-5.0) Community Planning . Building Administration PSB Front Counter Building Field Inspection Subdivisions landscape Architecture Reclassification - Construction Inspection landscape Inspection Redevelopment Senior Planner Assistant Director of Building & Housing Office Specialist Building Inspector II Senior Civil Engineer landscape Planner 1/11 Senior Public Works Inspector Public Works Inspector Senior landscape Inspector Senior Secretary Project Coordinator 1/11 Director of Redevelopment & Housing Principal Project Coordinator Total Proposed Staffing Changes -1.00 -1.00 -0.50 -1.00 -1.00 -1.00 -100 100 -100 -1.00 -2.00 -1.00 -100 -100.50 Reorqanizations Development and Maintenance Services - The fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget also reflects a reorganization of the City's development and maintenance service departments, including Engineering, General Services/Animal Care Facility, Planning & Building, the Development Services fund, and Redevelopment. The proposed reorganization includes the transfer of several large workgroups, including: . Transfer of the Animal Care Facility from the Public Works department to the newly retitled General Services/Animal Care Facility department (20.25 FTE) . Transfer of the Public Works Construction Inspection function from the Development Services fund to the General fund (10.00 FTE) . Transfer of the Planning & Building Administration function from the Development Services fund to the General fund (5.00 FTE) . Consolidation of the remaining Development Services fund (Planning & Building and Engineering) under a newly created Deputy City Manager/Director of Development Services (10.00 FTE) . Consolidation of the Engineering department with the Public Works department (31.00 FTE) C' n: to' Engineering (-32.0) Administrative Analyst 1/11 Assistant Director of Engineering Assistant Surveyor 1/11 Associate Engineer Building Project Manager Engineering Technician 1/11 land Surveyor -33- .\$ III-t.,; Development Services Fund (1.0) Public Works ( -20.25) General Services/ Animal Care Facility (20.25) Development Services Fund-Planning & Building (-5.0) General Fund-Planning & Building (5.0) Development Services Fund-Public Works (-100) General Fund-Public Works (100) Redevelopment (-10) General Fund-Planning & Building (1 0) Principal Civil Engineer Principal Management Analyst Real Property Manager Secretary Senior Administrative Secretary Senior Civil Engineer Senior Engineering Technician Signal Systems Engineer 1111 Survey Technician 1111 Landscape Planner 1/11 Animal Adoption Counselor Animal Care Assistant Animal Control Manager Animal Control Officer Animal Control Officer Supervisor Office Specialist Registered Veterinary Technician Senior Animal Care Assistant Senior Office Specialist Administrative Technician Development Automation Specialist Director of Planning & Building Senior Administrative Secretary Senior Secretary Public Works Inspector 1111 Senior Civil Engineer Senior Public Works Inspector , Senior Secretary 2.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 400 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 6.50 1.00 4.00 100 350 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Senior Project Coordinator 1.00 Net Proposed Staffing Change 0.00 The following title changes are recommended in order to reflect the new organization of the development and maintenance services departments. ".U :_ ~ ; General Services/Animal Care Facility Planning & Building Animal Control Manager Director of Planning & Building Animal Care Facility Manager 100 Deputy City ManagerlDir of Dev Services 1.00 Administration - The fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget also reflects a reorganization of the Administration Department, including the transfer of the Economic Development program to -34- Planning & Building and the transfer of the Office of Budget & Analysis to the Finance department. The proposed reorganization of the City's administration function is summarized below. Administration (-7.0) Finance (4.0) Planning & Building (2.0) Recreation (1.0) Assistant Director of Budget & Analysis 1.00 Fiscal & Management Analyst 3.00 Economic Development Officer 1.00 Principal Economic Development Specialist 1.00 Fiscal & Management Analyst 1.00 Net Proposed Staffing Change 0.00 The following title changes are recommended in order to reflect the reorganization of the administration function. Finance Budget & Analysis Manager 100 Fiscal Year 2009-10 Proposed Staffinq Chanqes In conjunction with the normal budget development process, a number of staffing modifications were requested, with a net impact of 2.5 additional FTE. The proposed staffing changes include: . Enhanced Animal Care Facility staffing (2.0 FTE) . Addition of a revenue offset Associate Engineer to the Public Works Department (1.0 FTE) . Transfer of a Public Safety Analyst from the General fund to the Police Grants fund (0.5 FTE) . Addition of a Deputy Fire Chief (1.0 FTE) . Addition of a revenue offset Recycling Specialist 1111 to the Environmental Services fund (1.0 FTE) . Elimination of a Parking Meter Technician from the Parking Meter fund (0.5 FTE) . Reclassifications in the Public Works, Police, Fire, and Library departments. The table below summarizes the proposed changes reflected in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget. General Services/ Animal Care Facility (2) Animal Care Facility Animal Adoption Counselor Registered Veterinary Technician Veterinary Assistant Animal Care Assistant 050 1.00 1.00 -0.50 -35- Ii:... Survey Associate Engineer 1.00 Public Works Reclassification - Open Open Space Inspector -1.00 (1) Space Senior Landscape Inspector 1.00 Resou rce Management Public Safety Analyst -050 Reclassification - Traffic Police Agent -100 Police Operations Peace Officer 1.00 (-0.5) Reclassification - Public Safety Analyst -1.00 Professional Standards Civilian Background Investigator 1.00 Administration Deputy Fire Chief 1.00 Reclassification - Fire Marshall -100 Administration Deputy Fire Chief 1.00 Fire Reclassification - Assistant Fire Chief -1.00 (1) Administration Deputy Fire Chief 1.00 Reclassification - Training Fire Battalion Chief -1.00 Division Chief 1.00 Library Reclassification - Director of Library -1.00 (0) Administration Deputy City Managerl Director of Library 100 Development Services Subdivisions Associate Engineer 1.00 Fund (0) Transportation Planning Associate Engineer -1.00 Fleet Reclassification - Fleet Equipment Maintenance Manager -1.00 (0) Operations Fleet Manager 100 Police Grants CBAG CBAG Budget Manager -1.00 (-1.5) CBAG Lead Programmer Analyst -100 Police Grants Public Safety Analyst 0.50 Environmental Svcs Environmental Services Recycling Specialist IIII 1.00 (1) Parking Fund Parking Parking Meter Technician -0.50 (-0.5) Net Proposed Staffing Change 2.50 -36- 5-Year Position Summary ~" "~''''1~111v~'m\'''''(',~., ,..,.,.,.",'",.,,,~,,.. ""''''''''''''''''''''''''''''J.lf'~"'''!1W-'''1'''7'''l!"''''''''''''''''1"I'''jPl''''_!Fl'''''''''rn::''''"""rl~-'lI ~ """"="'~~"''' ",' ~"m",'ml='-"~i'~ .~:':;.'c~"" .Mt'J~\)'"<'$'-''"''''''''''' '<.. , ~JI~!<" ~ "Ii . "-i"f. :;g'1'" "i\I"S;:;(~L'!M".;;tH""""~i~~"'1ii~W.1;':::~"',:)\))W'f(ii)(/'<~(,;iH"""<'?'t;;'""'m:mt.,;W\(U!,,,,;,(,)");;)"'~'i*\!\(q,\!.''''(';;\'' ~'"'iil^ :' "''';4',' ';;>'k";';'\;s"~"'(i j I ;'Yj*'&";"'I",'li~'r.hN:Air~. ~;.;i1*;;'" '~!iiJ$lAY!litrr;;fF!,.;,,1r"j""'I.,:I'N111 ,; f~~8 .. ',~,"," " ..j;i;:.wW)j]~,; '~l:;;~1j.8l2~b"'m4~2uitd~MDj~~J!':;W~~j€:rili:mm:b[;m;~:E:Lil~~till~~1L~1l;~lJ ;0:: '. .;"';"~ia~~""- 'f~~~~'4i.fSM":,i~hf lJ1~lri~l<l~wHlUt.;rmHtr'"~ra,,L "lliii:1 ~)~~.:)nnM.Y~:iiJ,f.t.:Itj~~ City Council ' City Clerk/Elections City Attorney Administration Information Technology Services Human Resources Finance TOTAL ~U~JW~ General Services/Animal Care Facility Community Development Planning & Building Engineering Public Works 14,00 8,50 14,00 20,00 29,00 25,50 28,00 139.00 15,00 8,50 14,00 21,00 29,00 25,50 31,00 144.00 14,00 8,50 14,00 19,00 28,00 25,00 31,Q0 139.50 14,00 7.50 12,00 26,00 23,00 20,50 25,00 128.00 13,00 6,50 10,00 1Q,00 19,00 16,00 26,00 100.50 ~ ";" TOTAL ~t~:I/;~'Jt~~~~'];Vli!~tfl'1A,(1r,d~';iJJ1m Police Fire 10523 25,00 91,00 51,00 186,00 458.23 104,75 25,00 90,50 51,00 186,50 457.75 102,25 13,00 80,50 41,Q0 150,50 387,25 20,00 34,50 194,15 249.25 22,25 28,00 19450 244.75 TOTAL ~ijli!;jt~~~~."'tt~~Jtl1~1!W]il!!~'1i1AlI Recreation Library Nature Center 360,50 141,00 501.50 381,50 151,00 532.50 366,50 153,00 519.50 337,50 135,00 472.50 322,00 136,00 458.00 TOTAL ,~ENERAt j:UNDjSUSTOTAL, ',j' ,,,,' , " ~,;;~r';;;Ji,,~f,1i~r.l.~1,iA:lj)~*ift,~!i)t~~~i~'~ Development Services Parking Meter Police Grant Funds/California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) Environmental Services Redevelopment & Housing Transit Sewer Fle.et Management '" GENERAL FUND SU13:TOTAL 34,00 70,75 9,25 114.00 '':'3 ;l):::1;#~J. 7$' 34,00 70,75 9,25 114.00 ,,1,248:25 34,00 66,25 9,50 109.75 :'1;156:00 38,50 50,75 89.25 :"(939.00 26,00 40,25 66.25 869:50 39,00 ~',',,',,',f';f,'<h . .......",,,,,,,, GRAND TOTAL (does not include hourly staffing) 0,50 14,00 "11'.14;50" ,.,.,........ ." 1 ,227.23 0,50 1,00 14,00 15.50" , ... 1,263.75 0,50 21,00 11,00 3,00 43,00 14,00 92:5q 1,248.50 70,00 0,50 21,00 3,00 17,00 3,00 46,00 1Q,00 170;:50 1,109,50 '<b, 22,50 4,00 11,00 3,00 46,00 10,00 , ,{3~,5q 1,005.00 -38- p R T o o s p E D B u D G E GIENERAl FUND SUMMARY General Fund Revenue Summary General Fund Expenditure Summary Department Summary Reports -39- ~%!!, ;>.' ;';i~~';::::~~:(?r t'\ I" '''1' ~., "<'~ t, ," ~i:;;tf;r~; . ",:;i)!'{!::~)::':':[~~' ~'''!' '-"<"'1'" I' ,,>"..'l, ""'11< '''', ' ';~:':'"/~1t ~\~~ 1!1;"il;""l'h,~@,r'\l<"I", , ,~1!:;~ :~:::';:>1;~::~~:~,!;t;:;;;',,:: " ~',", , 'j :~'::Ji~1 " . -.',' ,,"'I"T"'-""'''''I'''''' "I ,,~i!j,;l:;:i,!' ~:~~: : J i~~\!';~ >::'~,~'~;~;j,:,:;~~;;::,~;,' I'. "j, , ,,- , I ' "."n", < III < <.,"~ I" ,,!i:m;'::;,:I:;:'I:!):'~':;,'r:;i,::::}"::I;:;::"~t I'l<"""!."'" "f"^'!'I"'~J"h"'l<'" 1!:ii",:;:I,:i:::i4.;:'~~,::!::':;!;':;:'i:::!' l'<""'lll",<!,'l'l"~"""l" :1';;~;f;,~;i:;:(:~~~fujiJii .;;~:;: .\:~~ . :,:"'1""" 'Jr:---:'''J;:~;ll'j':'11: ',,:' 1" 'I. ,~o, ',~"" -"", ,,"'I, , 1~~\;:i:::~', '/,;:,ir.J:,;, i ;' i" ,:~ .:~" ::(1' A~!:;;; , r"'" "'-I-,~l' , , ,,' , ,,'.. ',','""", r'ti:i;:;::,:;::f"'~;, , ,iI' ;':,':;":::''''::;'';i 1.""""",',4~""!",,,,!,,1" );;!;{:;'~!lii1:~:I:i~;~l:J::~;1::":l::~1~i;~k, t :' ",,,' 'll'I"'I;""jll"""~I\""k"~ ;; :'~:::,,::l~:. ,;,}'~:\~::,/;i::;:,ii' :!' :':':;l:!:: >, :;~.~' ::-'-:, : )1:;, '!i">:~~:: :Ji!':;::,:::i,::!i:',~):::::;,:;,:!: .,,'::::,:;,':, ,'::: . ~l:r-:!ll; ,:' ,,:l~ )1~:i~i;i!!:/;!:~2:.~~::,'::}?j;i:~; fi""",n)",,,, 1~!~1i,,1::,i;::i';:~';~::~::::!:,;:,:J':':i(, r'J"L""!w...""~9">" ~f:;":;::/i,,;i,~t~::;:,:,::,!i.:: ,,,,,,'II'I,/~'<,,,,,,,,,,, ., :~::'^1~~:::::J9 ).,;l;:~:l~; ~::;:l: , " "'~ GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY The fiscal year 2009-10 estimated revenues total $132.8 million and are projected to support the operating budget with no impact on reserves. General Fund revenues are projected to decrease from fiscal year 2008-09 projected levels by $7.0 million or -5%. The revenue reductions reflect the continued impacts due to the prolonged national and local recession, which is expected to begin a slow recovery by the end of calendar year 2009. The local economy has seen a serious economic downturn, affecting the majority of General Fund discretionary revenues. Mitigation strategies continue to be implemented in the 2009-10 fiscal year in order to offset declining revenues. The General Fund Summary table on the following page reflects the serious decline in revenues that the City has experienced. r--tHULA VISTA GENERALFU'~6 ~~~-~-~-U~$'l' i in thousands (000) I , ,I.- , , , i FY 07-08 Actual ,153,938 FY 08-09 Projected 139,915 FY, 09,10 Proposed 132;844 %' 08-09 to FY 09-10 -5.1% The largest revenue increases between fiscal years 2008-09 and 2009-10 are projected as follows: . Increased Transfers From Other Funds revenue from $11,1 million to $12.2 million ($1.1 million or 10.5%), this reflects a $2.4 million increase in the transfer from the Redevelopment Agency due to a loan repayment to the General Fund. This increase is offset by reduced revenues from the Gas Tax Fund due to decreased consumer spending on fuel (-$0.4 million), the Development Services Fund due 'to a reduction in staffing' and citywide overhead (-$0.6 million), and miscellaneous reductions in other funds (-$0.4 million) . Increased Development revenue from $1.0 million to $1.9 million ($0 9 million). This increase largely reflects the transfer of the Construction Inspection group to the General Fund from the Development Services Fund. -41. . Increased Utilitv Users Taxes revenue from $7.4 million to $8.2 million ($0.7 million or 10.1 %). These increases are a result of contractual negotiations by staff and subject to contract terms. UUT revenues would be a secure source of ongoing funding for City services if the City modernized its ordinance, as recommended by the City's tax consultant and recently approved by the citizens of more than 45 jurisdictions throughout California. . Increased Inter-fund Reimbursements revenue from $9.3 million to $97 million ($0.4 million or 4.7%). Changes in this category include an increase in CIP revenue ($2.2 million) resulting from economic stimulus funding, and an increase in Open Space reimbursements ($0.2 million). These revenue increases are offset by decreases in reimbursements from other agencies (-$1.0 million), elimination of CIP reimbursements from Development Impact Fee Funds and Community Development Block Grants (-$0.6 million), and a decrease in Redevelopment Agency reimbursements (-$0.4 million). Offsetting these estimated revenue increases are the following projected decreases: . A $2.3 million reduction in Use of Money and Property revenues in the General Fund. Due to the City's reduced cash balances there are no projected investment earnings that are being budgeted. . A $2.0 million reduction in Property Tax revenues as a result of significant decreases in assessed property values countywide. Resale home prices have dropped considerably over the last year resulting in a reduction in supplemental property tax revenue. . A $2.0 million reduction in Other Agency revenues due to the elimination of the STRETCH and DASH programs (-$1.7 million) and a reduction in state and federal grant revenues (-$0.3 million). Beginning in fiscal year 2009-10, the Chula Vista Elementary School District will be partnering with the YMCA to run the STRETCH and DASH programs at local elementary schools. . A $1.5 million reduction in Motor Vehicle Licenses revenue. After fiscal year 2005-06, the property tax in-lieu portion of the VLF revenues received by municipalities are increased by the jurisdiction's.annual growth in assessed valuation. The City's decrease in assessed values. for fiscal year 2009-10 is reflected in the projected decrease in VLF revenues. . A $1.3 million reduction in Sales Tax revenues due to the current recession and reduced consumer spending. -42- The following table and charts provide a summary view of the major General Fund revenue sources. General Fund Revenues (Projected vs. Proposed) In Thousands (000) Property Taxes $ 29,307 $ 29,232 $ 27,199 -7.0% Sales Tax $ 28,305 $ 26,890 $ 25,546 -50% Motor Vehicle Licenses $ 19,797 $ 19,816 $ 18,287 -7.7% Transfers from Other Funds $ 9,736 $ 11,058 $ 12,220 10.5% Franchise Fees $ 9,663 $ 10,033 $ 10,033 00% Interfund Reimbursements $ 12,542 $ 9,288 $ 9,727 4.7% Utility Users Taxes $ 7,378 $ 7,422 $ 8,169 101% Charges for Services $ 6,845 $ 5,834 $ 5,897 1.1% Transient Occupancy Taxes $ 2,697 $ 2,570 $ 2,603 1.3% Fines, Forfeitures & Penalties $ 1,520 $ 2,231 $ 2,380 66% Other Local Taxes $ 2,033 $ 2,031 $ 2,031 0.0% Development Revenue 1 $ 9,453 $ 995 $ 1,876 88.6% Use of Money & Property $ 2,907 $ 4,059 $ 1,780 -56.1% Other Revenues $ 4,647 $ 2,870 $ 1,709 -405% Police Grants $ 2,014 $ 1,724 $ 1,514 -12.1% Other Agency Revenue $ 4,224 $ 3,201 $ 1,221 -619% Licenses & Permits $ 870 $ 660 $ 653 -1.2% Total General Fund Revenues $ 153,938 $ 139,915 $ 132,844 -5.1% 1 Beginning with fiscal year 2008 09, the major development related revenues (i.e. building permits, zoning fees, plan checking fees, plumbing permits, electrical permits, and utility permits) were moved out of the General Fund to a Development Services Fund (Fund 236) to provide better transparency and to try and insulate the General Fund from the business cycles of the construction industry. The fiscal year2009-1 0 reflects the transfer of the Public Works division from the Development Services Fund to the General Fund. -43- General Fund Revenues by Category Fiscal Year 2009-10 Motor Vehicle Licenses 14% Development Rev. 1% Interfund Reimb. 7% Sales Tax 19% Transfers In 9% Franchise Fees 8% Utility Users Taxes 6% Property Taxes 21% Other Revenue 7% \ , \_ Other Local Taxes 2% ..-----._____ Charges for Services 4% Historical and Estimated General Fund Revenue Sources Fiscal Years 2003-04 through 2009-10 80 180 160 140 120 100 60 40 20 FY 04 Actual gSales Tax fJIn terfund Reimb. TOT mLicenses & Permits BOthe r Ag ency Re \.e nue FY 05 Actual FY06Actual FY 07 Actua I FY 08 Actu al FY 09 Estimated FY 10 Budget E'iDevelopment Rev ISIUtility Users Taxes !J:Oth er Revenu e fmPolice Grants .t:01Property Taxes Transfers In ElCharges for Services CFines Forfeitures & Penalties BMotor Vehicle Licenses t:JFranchlse Fees Othe r La cal Taxes IlDUre of Money & Property -44- DIVERSIFIED REVENUE BASE One of the City's strengths has been its diversified revenue base. A diversified revenue base lessens the impact fluctuations in specific economic sectors have on the City's ability to provide services. Although we maintain a diversified revenue base, it will be imperative to the continued fiscal sustainability of the City to focus on increasing its discretionary revenue base. PROPERTY TAX REVENUE Under Proposition 13, which was enacted in 1979, property taxes for general government purposes are limited to 1 % of the market value of the property assessed. Assessment of qualifying property, as well as collection and apportionment of tax revenues are all functions performed by the County. Increases to assessed values to reflect current market values are only allowed when property changes hands or when the property is improved. Otherwise, annual assessment value increases are limited to 2% orthe increase in the consumer price index, whichever is lower. Historical Assessed Value Annual Percentage Change 25% 20% 10% 15% 5% 0% 990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 -5% -10% -- Chula Vista -- County Overall Property tax revenues, projected at $27.2 million for fiscal year 2009-10, is the City's single largest discretionary revenue source and accounts for 21 % of the total revenue for the General Fund. Based on projections provided by the County Assessors Office, assessed values in Chula Vista increased by -45- 14% in fiscal year 2007-08 and 2% in fiscal year 2008-09. The most recent projection from the County Assessor shows a decline of 8% in assessed values for fiscal year 2009-1 O. Property tax values have continued to fall during this economic recession with Chula Vista being one of the harder hit areas. The large number of foreclosures have depressed housing values, and the significant drop in home resale prices have dramatically reduced supplemental property tax revenues. Supplemental property taxes are calculated based on the difference between the current value of a property and the resale value of the property. Typically, property values increase as a property is resold. Due to the current housing crisis, most home resale values have dropped, resulting in a large reduction in supplemental property tax revenue. SALES AND USE TAX REVENUE Prior to fiscal year 2004-05, the City received 1 % in sales and use tax revenue from all taxable retail sales occurring within the City limits. Beginning in fiscal year 2004-05, the State reduced the local allocation by 0.25% and applied these funds as security for the State's Economic Recovery Bonds. The State committed to replacing the 0.25% sales tax revenues dollar-for-dollar in local property tax from the County Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF). For forecasting and comparison purposes, sales tax revenues are projected at the full 1 % rate. For fiscal year 2009-1 0, the estimated sales tax revenue is $25.5 million. These funds are collected by the State at a rate of 8.75% for the San Diego County region. On April 1, 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger enacted a 1 % sales tax increase statewide thereby increasing the state's portion from 6% to 7%. The Sales Tax rate is divided as follows: State 7.00% State Fiscal Recovery Fund (Economic Recovery Bonds) 0.25% Local Jurisdiction (City or County of place of sale or use) 0.75% Local Transportation Fund (County of place of sale or use) 0.25% Local San Diego County Transnet Funding 0.50% Total Sales Tax Rate 875% Sales and use tax revenue is the City's second largest discretionary revenue source, account for 19% of total revenue for the General Fund in fiscal year 2009-10. Due to the current economic recession consumer spending has decreased significantly nationwide; a decrease of 5% in sales tax revenue is projected for fiscal year 2009-10. Since fiscal year 2006-07 the City has experienced a decrease of -46- 11% in this revenue category. Sales tax projections will continue to be conservative until it becomes apparent that the economy has recovered sufficiently to merit an increase in the forecast. Sales Taxes Per Capita $300 $50 Co~nty,l\\,erag,"$129/State Average $131 $250 $200 $150 $100 $0 Del Mar $271 Ca rlsbad $216 National City $200 EI Cajon $194 Escondid 0 $167 La Mesa $167 San Diego ChulaVista $145 $107 Iii! Gene ral Reta il li1ilCo nstruction !SIiFood Products IliijBusiness to Business ...Transportation FnM iscellan eous As noted on the chart above, sales tax on a per capita basis for the City is only $107 compared to the County average of $129 and the State average of $131. This comparison indicates that the City's residents spend a high percentage of their retail dollars elsewhere, especially considering that a healthy share of our sales and use tax revenues are generated by cross-border shoppers. It seems clear that the City must continue to place a high priority on developing the retail business base by focusing on projects such as the expansion of the auto park and the eastern urban center in order to ensure the City's long-term fiscal health. Many residents believe that property tax fully funds local government costs. The reality is that the City of Chula Vista only receives an average of 14.7 cents out of every property tax dollar paid by City residents This is less than the amount received by the school districts and the County. In fact, the . . . . amount the City receives is about equal to the amount that the City and the County lose each year to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF). The ERAF is the amount the State takes from both cities and counties to provide additional funding for schools. The City's ERAF loss projected for fiscal year 2007-08 is $6.6 million, for a $60.5 million cumulative reduction since ERAF began in fiscal year 1 992-93. -47- How Your Property Tax Dollar is Spent ~ ~ I Misc. Southwestern Educational City County Sweetwater Chula Vista $0.021 Community Revenue of of Union High Elementary College Augmentation Chula San School School District Fund Vista Diego District District $0.051 $0.14 $0.147 $0.163 $0.188 $0.29 MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE FEES The Vehicle License Fee (VLF) revenue has gone through many changes in the past few years. The fee was initially established back in 1948 and directed to local government. The State had previously assessed a 2% of value VLF on car registrants on behalf of local governments. In May 2004, in an attempt to assist with the State's fiscal crisis, the State dropped the VLF fee from 2% to 0.65%. Except for the first three months of the year, the State back-filled this fee reduction with other State funds, keeping local government revenue whole. Beginning in fiscal year 2004-05, the local government share of VLF has narrowed. Cities continue to receive 0.65% portion of the fee directly from the State, but this amount is now net of County realignment and administrative reductions. The State backfills the gap created by the fee reduction from 2% to 065% with an additional allocation of local property tax from County ERAF funds, referred to as the VLF swap. After 2006, the VLF swap was valued at the original 2005 amount, and increased by the jurisdiction's annual growth in assessed valuation. This revenue source is projected to decrease by 8% in fiscal year 2009-10 to $18.3 million representing 14% of total General Fund revenues. The projected reduction in VLF revenue is a result of the estimated negative decline in assessed property .48. values as well as a reduction in the amount of vehicle registration revenues available for distribution to California cities. FRANCHISE FEES Franchise fee revenues are generated from public utility sources such as San Diego Gas & Electric (2% on gas and 1.25% on electricity), trash collection franchises (9.05% fee), and cable franchises (5% fee) conducting business within City limits. SDG&E is the single largest generator of Franchise Fees and accounts for approximately 50% of the total franchise revenues, which are received semi-annually, in March and August. SDG&E collects the franchise fee from Chula Vista customers and through a municipal surcharge imposed on the South Bay Power Plant based on their usage of natural gas. Due to the volatility of the price of natural gas and fluctuation in usage this component is difficult to project. Trash franchise fees and cable fees are more predictable due to the fixed rates charged and the monthly and quarterly receipt of the revenues respectively. Franchise Fees are projected to remain flat at $10.0 million in fiscal year 2009-10, which represents approximately 8% of total General Fund revenues. UTILITY USERS TAX UUT revenues are projected to grow slightly using population factors and are adjusted downward to account for market saturation in the wireless telecom sector due to the shift in usage of landline telephones to cellular telephones and to internet and other private-network communications. SDG&E is the predominant energy provider with dozens of telecommunications providers. UUT is received on a monthly basis from the various providers. Total UUT revenues projected for fiscal year 2009-1 0 is $8.2 million, which represents approximately 6% of total General Fund revenues. The increase in fiscal year 2009-10 revenues is mainly due to agreements between the City and local wireless companies. The City adopted its Utility Users Tax (UUT) in 1978. The City ofChula Vista imposes a UUT on the use of telecom at the rate of 5% of gross receipts, which represents 66% of the total UUT revenues received. The UUT on natural gas services is $0.00919 per therm and $0.00250 per kilowatt on electricity services, which equates to approximately a 1 % tax. OTHER REVENUE Revenue projections are continually reviewed and updated by City staff. As described above, major general revenues, such as property taxes, sales taxes, franchise fees, utility users tax and motor vehicle license fees, are projected by the Finance Department based on prior history, growth and inflation projections, and economic climate. Additional assistance in the projection of revenues is -49- provided by subject-matter experts such as the City's sales and property tax consultants, the County Assessor and reviewing regional and local economic forecasts provided by the UCLA Anderson Forecast and the University of San Diego's Index of Leading Economic Indicators for San Diego County, respectively. The fiscal year 2009-1 0 proposed budget reflects decreases in program revenues to reflect a downturn in development, decreased attendance at recreation facilities, and the adjustments to grant revenues. -50- GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY T. he General Fund budget for fiscal year 2009-10 totals $132.8 million, which reflects a net decrease of $7.8 million (-5.5%) when compared to the fiscal year 2008-09 estimated expenditures and a decrease of $9.5 . CHULAVISTAGENERA[ FUNP BUDGET . jnthousands (090) FY 07-98 Actual Expendit~res f'(08-mJ sstir;nated Exp'enditures FY O~-10 Budget change FY 08-09 (AB) FY 09-10 .. .155,022 140:630 13'2,844 -!;.5% million (-67%) when compared to the fiscal year 2008-09 adopted budget. As mentioned previously in this document, early in the budget process, the City identified a budgetary shortfall of nearly $20 million dollars with fiscal year 2009-10 revenues estimated at $134.2 million and expenditures estimated at $154.2 million. Through several workshops, and departmental meetings, the City identified net reductions of $20.0 million briefly summarized below: . Elimination of Management, Professional. CVEA and WCE Jan 2009 and Jan 2010 COLAs and the elimination of management's 401 (a) program. D Deferral of POA and IAFF Jan 2009 and Jan 2010 COLAs to be spread out in 6 month increments starting in July 2010 for POA and Jan 2011 for IAFF. . Department consolidations and reductions. . Implementation of budget reduction plan - this resulted in the elimination of 89.0 positions from the General Fund. The elimination of these positions was accomplished through early retirements, elimination of vacant positions, demotions in-lieu of layoffs. and layoffs. As seen on the following table, personnel expenditures reflect a 7.2% decrease when compared to the fiscal year 2008-09 estimates. This reduction is attributable to the elimination/deferral of employee COLAs. eliminated positions, and retirements. Supplies and services are up by 8.2% mainly due to increased costs for insurance. election expenditures and fleet maintenance charges. The Other Expenses category reflects a reduction of 74.0% or $3.0 million when compared to the fiscal year 2008- -51- 09 estimates which reflects the transfer of $1.8 million for public liability expenses from the Other Expenses category to the Debt Service/Transfers Out category combined with a net decrease of approximately $1.2 million mainly due to a one time reimbursement to the PFDIF for Civic Center Obligations. The Utility category show a slight savings from the fiscal year 2008-09 estimates reflecting an approximate $100k savings in reduced energy usage for street lights as well as a savings from energy conservation projects, partially offset by overall increases in water, gas, electricity and phone rates. The Debt Service/Transfers Out category shows an increase of 29.7% or approximately $2 million which was due to the transfer of the public liability expenses mentioned above General Fund Expenditure Summary by Category In Thousands (000) ~t4"'r:f.$J ~~:~ $111,126 $13,557 $4,036 $77 $5,001 $6,834 $140,630 $0 $140,630 Personnel Services Supplies & Services Other Expenses Operating Capital Utilties $125,228 $15,345 $2,744 $892 $4,646 $6,010 $154,865 $156 $155,022 Debt Service/T ransfers Out Total Operating Budget Capital Projects Total General Fund Budget $103,173 $14,666 $1,050 $100 $4,994 $8,861 $132,844 $0 $132,844 -7.2% 8.2% -74.0% 29.8% -0.1% 29.7% -5.5% 0.0% -5.5% 1 Beginning with FY 08-09, various non-general funded positions (e,g. redeve)opmenUhousing staff, development service staff and CBAG staff) were moved out of the general fund and into their respective funding sources. General Fund Expenditure Percentage by Category Personnel Services 777% -52- Supplies & Services 11.0% Other Expenses 08% Utilties 3.8% Debt Service/ Xfers Out 6.7% PERSONNEL SERVICES EXPENDITURES AS A PERCENT OF BUDGET Personnel services expenditures (employee salaries and benefits) are by far the largest component of General Fund expenditures. At the beginning of fiscal year 2005-06, personnel services represented 79.4% of the overall general fund budget, compared to the current budgeted level of 77.7%. At the peak of staffing in fiscal year 2006-07, personnel services represented 81 4% of the total general fund budget and have come down steadily in each of the past three years due to the elimination of staffing citywide. Personnel and Non-Personnel Services Costs Percent of Council Adopted Budget 20% 100% 80% 60% 40% 0% FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 IJiIPersonnel Services !!I Non-Personnel STAFFING LEVELS Despite the City's population growing at an average rate of 2% over the past 5 years, the City's permanent, full time, benefited employees is 18.1 % lower than it was during the 2005-06 fiscal year and 20.5% lower when compared to the FY 2006-07 budget, which represents the peak for staffing. The following table summarizes the staffing changes by service category from fiscal year 2005-06 to fiscal year 2009-1 O. During this period, positions have been eliminated throughout the City including: Public Safety; 16.0 positions eliminated in Police (a 4.4% decrease) and 5 positions eliminated in Fire (a 3.5% decrease), Legislative and Administrative departments (39.0 positions eliminated; a 28.0% decrease), Development and Maintenance service (114.48 positions eliminated; a 24.2% decrease) and Community Services (47.75 positions eliminated; a 41 9% decrease) -53- Staffing Level FY 2005-06 to FY 2009-10 Legislative and Administrative 13950 144.50 140.00 12850 100.50 -39.00 Development and Maintenance 472.23 472.75 458.25 398.25 357.75 -11448 Public Safety 501.50 532.50 540 50 493 50 480.50 -2100 Community Services 11400 114.00 109.75 89.25 66.25 -47.75 Total City Staff 1227.23 1263.75 1248.50 1109.50 1005.00 -222.23 Budget constraints necessitated the net elimination of 258. 75 full time equivalent (FTE) positions from the City's high employment mark of 1,263.75 FTEs during fiscal year 2006-07. Due to these cuts, the FTE per thousand residents has decreased from 5.5 employees per thousand residents in fiscal year 2005-06 to an estimated 4.3 employees per thousand residents in fiscal year 2009-1 O. During this time, the city has seen an increase of 5,100 housing units and 15,565 residents (7.1 % increase), 112 acres of parks (30.0% increase), 4,100 Police calls for service (5.8% increase), and 45 miles of streets (13.0% increase). City of Chula Vista Staffing (FTEs) Compared to FTE's per Thousand Residents 1,500 1,250 1,000 w t-- 750 LL 500 250 0 ..6.0 ..5.5 '" '" ..5.0 '" ~ W t-- 4.5 LL 4.0 . 3.5 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007 -08 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 'N""""'" Total FTE's -FTE's/1000 -54- SALARY INCREASES As demonstrated below, per employee costs have increased significantly during the past several years as the city has sought to maintain a competitive position in the local labor market. Existing Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) agreements with the City's various employee bargaining groups originaily called for pay increases of 4% per year for the next two years for most employees; however, due to the current budget crisis, Police and Fire have agreed to defer their increases as shown in the following chart and all other employees (CVEA', WCE, CONF, PROF2, Mid Manager, Senior Managers and Executives) have given up their raises. From fiscal year 2005-06 through fiscal year 2012-13, compounded salary increases per the negotiated MOU agreements total 27.5% for members of the Chula Vista Police Officers' Association (POA), 26.5% for members of International Association of Firefighters (IAFF), 10.3 % for of the Chula Vista Employee Association (CVEA), Western Conference of Engineers (WCE) and Confidential Employees (CON F) and 6.1 % for Professional (PROF), Management and Executive employees. Summary of MOU salary increase by bargaining group January 2006 ....n.......... ......... ............. January 2007 4% ..................,............"",......,.", July 2007 0% July 2008 4% January 2009 0% .................. ............ ......... ................. January 2010 0% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... July 2010 1% January 2011 1 % ................ . July 2011 1% ... ..... ....... January 2012 1.5% ................................................... July 2012 1 5% .......""..... ................... January 2013 1 % Compounded Increase Jan 06 - Jan 13 27.5% Average Increase per year 3.1% 4% 0% 0% 0% 2% ................. 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6.1% 0.7% 26.5% 3.0% 10.3% 1.2% 6.1% 0.7% (1) CVEA employees could receive Increases up to 4% in Jan 2011 and Jan 2012 based on a benchmarK market study (2) Professional and Mid Manager's salary subject to meet and confer -55- RISING RETIREMENT COSTS The increase in CalPERS costs is a significant budgetary challenge facing the City. The two key factors driving the increased costs were the significant investment losses experienced by CalPERs and enhanced benefits during the same time period. Currently, the payments made to the retirement system equal 15.6% of the City's General Fund. Prior to fiscal year 2005-06, the CalPERS investment pool assumed a rate of return of 8.25% and any market gains (or losses) less than that amount could significantly affect the City's overall contribution rate. In fiscal year 2005-06, CalPERS adjusted their investment return assumption to 7.75% and have since adopted an asset smoothing method whereby any losses are spread out over a 15 year period to reduce the City's exposure to market volatility. The following graph shows the actual market rates of return for the CalPERS investment portfolio relative to the current 7.75% assumed rate of return. CalPERS Historical Market Value Rates of Return Relative to Assumed Investment Return of 7 75% 23.25% 775% ' 15.50% 0.00% -7.75%L- 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 The budgetary impacts caused by the increased employer contribution rates have been significant. The City's PERS contribution rates have increased from 17.4% for safety employees and 87% for miscellaneous employees in fiscal year 2001 '02 to 41.6% and 28 8% respectively in fiscal year 2009- 10. This translates into an increase of$16 6 million in budgeted PERS contributions -from $6.7 million in fiscal year 2001-02 to $23.3 million in fiscal year 2009-1 O. The vast majority of this increase is related directly to the CalPERS investment losses during fiscal years 2001, 2002 and 2003 These trends are displayed on the chart on the following page. It should be noted that the overall decrease in PERS costs seen over the past two years is a direct result of positions being eliminated from the budget. -56- Increase in Citywide budgeted PERS costs since fiscal year 2001-02 $35 $30 $25 '" $20 t: .~ :;: $15 $10 $5 $0 FY01-02 FY 02-03 FY03- 04 FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 HEALTH CARE COSTS Kaiser and PacifiCare/AETNA insurance premiums have increased an average of 8% per year since the beginning of fiscal year 2004-05. Taking into account the compounding effect of these increases over time, Kaiser premiums have increased 59.0% during this time while PacifiCare/AETNA 1 premiums have increased 40.3% over the same period. The annual budget for flexible spending accounts has increased from $8.5 million in fiscal year 2004-05 to $11.2 million in fiscal year 2009-10. Recent discussions with health care professionals indicate these high trends in health care costs are likely to continue for the foreseeable future, with an anticipated increase between 7% and 10% effective January 2010. The anticipated increase in health care costs is included in the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed budget. Premium increases by health care provider (FY 2004-05 to FY 2009-10) January 2005 January 2006 January 2007 January 2008 January 2009 Annual Avg Premium Increase 19.9% 6.9% 8.5% 5.0% 89% 9.7 8.4% 10.0% 16.4% -2.8% 4.0 7.0% 14.2% 85% 12.5% 1.1% 6.5% 8.4% I Effective January 2009, the City switched from PacifiCare to AETNA -57- -58- GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT SUMMARY The General Fund budget funds the day-to-day operations of most city services. For fiscal year 2009-10 the General Fund budget totals $132.8 million, which includes funding for the following departments: . Mayor and City Council . Non-Departmental . Boards and Commissions . General Services/Animal Care Facility . City Clerk . Planning and Building . City Attorney . Police . Administration . Fire . Information and Technology Services . Public Works . Human Resources . Recreation . Finance . Library To follow is a series of summary reports that reflect the anticipated revenues, expenditures, and staffing information for each of the General Fund departments. -59- -60- DESCRIPTION The City Council is comprised of a fulltime Mayor and four part-time Council members. The Mayor and City Council are elected at-large, and each holds office for a four-year term. The City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk, the primary executive, legal and document support officials are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Council. The City Council reviews and approves the budget, enacts ordinances, authorizes public improvements, adopts traffic regulations, approves contracts, and sits as the Redevelopment Agency and Housing Authority. The City Council is also granted some expressly defined executive functions such as confirmation authority over all executive management and department head appointments. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $1,222,849 $1,146,485 $1,080,516 $1,130,770 Supplies and Services $285,806 $135,747 $35,500 $86,248 Utilities $1,456 $1,575 $1,250 $1,444 Expenditure Totals $1,510,111 $1,283,807 $1,117,266 $1,218,462 Revenue Totals $0 Authorized Full Time Positions 14.00 14.00 13.00 -61- ~ "" ",,"i' - 4,.... - -, . . ~. ~ .1 ',f.. -' ,..;;- .' 'B(j)iA"R'IC\S ,A,I.dln, r""M''\:AhISS'I~''''''IS'' \ j ~~l.~ ,'; o~... 't~: ~~~,,; ~.~__jU. ~ ~II~:~. ':?~ ~ ~li~I' ~ ~"I~~I, ~.~ " .:' 'll. L~. ~.~~j DESCRIPTION The process of establishing boards and commissions is one that began with the City Charter as a method to give citizens a greater voice in the determination of policies at all levels of government. Four commissions were established by the Charter- the Planning Commission, the Board of Library Trustees, Civil Service Commission, and the Parks & Recreation Commission, All other boards and commissions have been established through an ordinance or resolution since that time in order to meet a specific need of the City Council. The members for Chartered commissions are appointed by a majority vote of the City Council, with applications for these appointments accepted throughout the year from all interested residents, SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Expenditure Totals l Revenue Totals r A~;~oriz~~~~~~ Time Positions 0.00 0.00 I I L I 0.00 0,00 -62- ~.. - :'.~.j. -:~:-,- -:- " -:-. ;~-~ ~ -~,,-~ ~ ~~~-:. LL~]It;;'1f'-:;~':.w::"'~'" -.""'" ":t;---r.-. - Jr. "":i-:~~--- ,.... .-"\"~ ---:", J;~~1 ."" U:;"""". "'?"".~,",-,~'" €1;,r;-.V"r,.",ED;V", ,"''-t. ....'.. ...>..,c.-'.""" ","" dI.~~\~"..1- ... ........-ll;....'\"!<(,.....l<...~ ~lljl.,.t.'~I:.'~8:1'-:1"';?,~. ~'~. i tt'I\..,."'~'l...;" ~ J . ! ..""L._ ~~.=.'U.....~Z,~"t..L"9_~<W:: ~ ~....~,..._..i ...--;. .....f-"~ ....~.;::;,-.,. :t'_ ..._;:~_ ~:JJ _" '"_.. {..._.....~."..J>._ _....fw-~'!.r,_~.. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the City Clerk's Office is to work diligently to enhance the public and organizational trust and knowledge by managing and providing accurate and timely information; safeguarding and improving access to public records; ensuring compliance with regulations and policies; and administering open and free elections. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $961,892 $893,023 $670,632 $683,789 Supplies and Services $199,933 $296,399 $468,425 $366,921 Operating Capital $0 $2,193 $0 $0 Utilities $1,803 $690 $600 $844 Expenditure Totals $1,163,628 $1,192,305 $1,139,657 $1,051,554 Revenue Totals $90,874 $109,181 $50,000 $35,718 Revenue Recovery % 8% 9% 4% 3% Authorized Full Time Positions 8.50 8.50 7.50 6.50 .63. "'- - ~ 7 <" , - ,""-- - -, ~ -- .-- ~ '_ ~ ~ _ . - - ,_ 'l!r . r~"" ~"::"~ t,-'~ .':.. _ _ C:~I,if.YAl::f9_~'~'~Y.L: '.' ,,''',., , .~ . ~:':l MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Chula Vista City Attorney's Office is to provide legal advice and support to the Mayor and Council, City departments, and boards and commissions in the conduct of City business, represent the City before judicial and administrative agencies in civil litigation proceedings and prosecute misdemeanor violations of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Utilities I Expenditure Totals $2,245,710 $2,062,384 $1,395,911 $1,524,013 $464,588 $462,982 $410,559 $445,805 $11,480 $1,996 $1,298 $1,560 $2,721,778 $2,527,362 $1,807,768 $1,971,378 Revenue Totals $534,398 $390,711 , $366,199 $210,195 Revenue Recovery % 20% 15% 20% 11% Authorized Full Time Positions 14.00 14.00 I 12.00 10.00 -64- ~...... h'';t'..~.~v:'.>A~",Y~~ "'<l'..".TO;;.~ ~.;;';.'(~..:_;:. ~_.';"':...J;:;',}:'C - "':~-;-.Z~~ - ..-;-~- 'T-lf ---"",,""-~ -V--;;-JI"!". ~ ("'.i':~:;~;.2~~":::tta~~~Mr~I~~I!'0\~I~~~~~. :~~.,::1:;~,:'~;~'Llj MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Administration Department is to provide the leadership necessary for the implementation of City Council policies, administration of the organization and delivery of services to our community. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $3,125,602 $2,935,353 $3,854,364 $1,580,098 Supplies and Services $358,078 $212,858 $221,332 $145,612 Utilities $9,235 $2,351 $2,925 i $1,770 Expenditure Totals $3,492,915 $3,150,562 $4,078,621 $1,727,480 Revenue Totals I $569,784 $575,539 $786,819 $403,869 Revenue Recovery % I 16% 18% 19% 23% ," ^"'^^"""n w^"'n"" Authorized Full Time Positions I 21.00 19.00 26.00 10.00 .65. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Information Technology Services Department is to provide technology, planning, development support and management to City employees and departments so they can perform their jobs effectively and meet their strategic goals for the City. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $3,249,009 $3,015,540 $2,781,602 $2,327,914 Supplies and Services $801,476 $701,587 $613,514 $660,156 Operating Capital $84,854 $7,861 $35,000 $100,000 Utilities $62,711 ! $44,590 $44,860 $57,479 Expenditure Totals $4,198,050 $3,769,578 $3,474,976 $3,145,549 Revenue Totals $424,603 $124,382 $67,143 $103,528 Revenue Recovery % 10% 3% 2% 3% , Authorized Full Time Positions 29.00 28.00 23.00 19.00 -66- MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Human Resources Department is to provide superior services to employees, departments, and the public to ensure an informed, quality work force and community, while treating everyone with fairness, dignity, and respect. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $2,915,460 $2,670,004 $2,351,053 $2,107,601 Supplies and Services $1,515,108 $1,188,882 $1,252,598 $1,747,310 Other Expenses $691,762 $1,010,530 $1,943,025 $0 Operating Capital $0 $0 $194 $0 Utilities $7,080 $3,603 $3,104 $3,367 Expenditure Totals $5,129,410 $4,873,019 $5,549,974 $3,858,278 Revenue Totals $322,480 $319,860 $829,035 I $277 ,968 Revenue Recovery % 6% 7% 15% 7% .:..........,.,.c;;;::..:.,.-.c.""."C.-- I - Authorized Full Time Positions 25.50 25.00 20.50 16.00 -67- f;-~U.;>: .o:i""~<.:;"~~ ::., :~-':;;l~~f'1I1!:;I!~I.I\~..t'''~lE~:t.;;;.;;.-.:.~.- .9~;'~~: i'-;,,:~~: '::~. ":S1 ~ '1'!.<';J<-... ~":'.,,.., , ~,~~ m~!;f"'''''''''' ..i-oHf.t'P,lii! ll~~I~~ "_~"" , ,~)~..\,~.,,~j)' f: "~"-";' 1o~_L~:'-' ~"---~1t- "<..,,,,\~,,~,\t':_~J.__I. ~~1',..-r-'~_'~ ~';~A~ ~ ~ .;,.~....U ~'L-..~t!:_A' ~,<L._ ~, 1,4 L...._A MISSION STATEMENT The Chula Vista Finance Department is dedicated to ensuring the long-term financial stability of the City and enhancing public and organizational trust through integrity of financial reporting and sound financial practices. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $2,819,512 $2,780,742 $2,434,203 $2,975,784 Supplies and Services $153,713 $181,919 $165,396 $183,871 Utilities $4,805 $3,917 $3,200 $4,365 Expenditure Totals $2,978,030 $2,966,578 $2,602,799 $3,164,020 Revenue Totals $1,671,553 $1,386,795 $1,205,693 Revenue 53% 38% Authorized Full Time Positions 25.00 26,00 .68. DESCRIPTION The Non-Departmental budget reflects expenditures and expenditure savings that are not directly related to any single department. The budget includes such items as interest expense, salary savings due to the furlough, transfers out to liability reserves, and transfers out to various Debt Service Funds for the General Fund's debt service obligations. This budget also includes all General Fund discretionary revenues. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services ($2,700,756) , ($2,585,366) $298,780 ($621,675) Supplies and Services $29,915 $427,063 $654,344 $180,080 Other Expenses $511,249 $1,303,520 $1,684,531 $652,321 Operating Capital $0 $1,165 $0 $0 Utilities $0 $0 $12,500 $0 Transfers Out $5,357,771 $6,009,891 $6,833,982 $8,688,551 CIP Project Expenditures $400,584 $156,475 $0 $0 Non-CIP Project Expenditures $2,238 $0 $0 $0 Expenditure Totals $3,601,001 $5,312,748 $9,484,137 $8,899,277 Revenue Totals $107,724,236 $101,948,387 Authorized Full Time Positions 0.00 0.00 0.00 -69- 1;"~'-:h_'_:~:;~'EN~j~L sijRNlc,Esh~t~nMA1'cA,~,~,~@!,~illJ:~t :~ :_~'''] MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Chula Vista Animal Care Facility is to ensure the health and safety of animals and citizens in Chula Vista, Imperial Beach, National City and Lemon Grove. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $9,290,037 $8,832,504 $0 $1,740,468 Supplies and Services $1,128,127 $1,212,604 $0 $592,779 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $2,429 Operating Capital $41,499 $20,758 $0 $0 Utilities $337,275 $258,824 $0 $62,778 I Expenditure Totals $10,796,938 $10,324,690 $0 $2,398,454 Revenue Totals $6,204,646 $6,325,251 $0 $783,500 Revenue Recovery % 57% 61% N/A 33% Authorized Full Time Positions 104,75 102.25 0.00 22.25 -70- ~-- ~ ..~<' j~,-", ~.- ,4 ... . .,(ffl ." -., -'ff'- - "": '.; ...~,'" ='.' " . '.~.ip'I:' A' ""1~1'1'''':i'I''"'' 11.\....'1'.",.' B'I,il:I:lLn'I'N" C' , : . " ". .;;;, I ': ;:_" ":'''_J..:-2. . .'~;~... ~'~I:~t~,!~~..lt.'!:ll~ _~~ ~ ~ -' \cl~~~:.. .... _,':.~:~~-' ~~',~.: MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Planning & Building Department is to guide the physical development of the City through the implementation of the General Plan and building Codes. We are committed to enhancing the quality of life in our community by planning for sound infrastructure and public services, protection of the environment, and promotion of high quality social and economic growth. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $9,244,958 $8,175,317 $2,264,505 $3,473,883 Supplies and Services $621,103 $430,629 $58,350 $489,262 Other Expenses $157,256 $165,158 $130,730 $130,730 Utilities $51,922 $30,489 $11,088 $13,653 Expenditure Totals $10,075,239 $8,801,593 I $2,464,673 $4,107,528 I Revenue Totals $7,425,604 $6,824,637 I $2,022,372 $3,186,797 I Revenue Recovery % 74% 78% i 82% 78% =! Authorized Full Time Positions 90.50 80.50 T 20.00 28.00 .71. ..; - ,'-; '.: .:" "_..- ~Ot~IC~ _ ." " ~ _ : . : MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Chula Vista Police Department is to enhance the quality of life in the City of Chula Vista by' - Providing a proactive and professional level of police service ensuring safety through commitment, integrity and trust - Managing resources effectively - Treating all persons with fairness, respect and dignity - Maintaining a partnership with the community to meet contemporary and future challenges SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $44,976,183 $44,015,194 $42,174,039 $40,587,231 Supplies and Services $3,781,797 $3,226,891 $2,961,610 $2,821,823 Other Expenses $66,421 $63,032 $52,171 $81,669 Operating Capital $374,302 SO $0 $0 Utilities $426,877 $463,083 $468,595 $421,806 I Expenditure Totals $49,625,580 $47,768,200 $45,656,415 $43,912,529 Revenue Totals $8,967,142 $7,614,804 I $7,352,521 $7,111,677 Revenue Recovery % 18% 16% 16% 16% ~ . r.;81.;~-'- 366.50 ~I 33;.~~22.00 Authorized Full Time Positions .72. [~ ..-..:..,...-:~,..;. I"f',i-~"'i It> .,'1=: :~'l..."f:;"1 --~,":r~ I ~-, ,-~:' ,J,~''- _, ~.[l 'tii".~:.,.~.-nJ ~""" 'tI * :.-" ""..d~,,, ~'.' .~',..'. ~\ '." ......"~,' , ~a::;;:II'RE i,! .;, ~. ~... ~, _'" ~A'fO """"- '.~.. I!'.... ~ 1; ~<j,,,, ....'"'''' ,__', ..""F '..:C rp..a;t.~.. :.., ,""-.... '...";;, ;\."'.$~~- .(~-~ '~....~_~_~_~__~__..e__ ___~ __-.L:_z~~_..c.'~ ~-d__.___,,-,- _ ~.~_. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Chula Vista Fire Department is to protect life, environment, and property. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $20,935,078 $21,361,720 $20,939,461 $19,021,737 Supplies and Services $1,514,064 $1,981,771 $1,865,410 $1,831,373 Other Expenses $27,000 $0 $0 $0 Operating Capital $24,626 $829,555 $0 $0 Utilities $217,471 $177,599 $189,243 $202,473 Transfers Out $0 $0 $0 $172,216 Expenditure Totals $22,718,239 $24,350,645 $22,994,114 $21,227,799 Revenue Totals $1,618,480 I $2,034,105 $1,781,083 $1,253,677 Revenue Recovery % 7% 8% 8% 6% Authorized Full Time Positions I~cc~~~.~~ I 153.00 135.00 136.00 -73- " '-' .' .." . : .... ,. 'PUBl:I.C',WORKS. . .... :, ....,. ",' J - ~.. - ~ - - A ~ _ L_ _ ~ ~ MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Public Works Department is to provide and manage the City's infrastructure, parks and open space through high quality operations, maintenance and construction in order to optimize mobility, public and environmental health and safety. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $15,716,378 $12,234,936 $15,915,742 $19,177,012 Supplies and Services $3,357,313 $2,528,756 $3,362,422 $3,668,049 Other Expenses $18,189 $20,349 $149,000 $179,175 Operating Capital $156,335 $0 $0 $0 Utilities $1,652,163 $1,652,015 $3,344,100 $3,371,365 Expenditure Totals $20,900,378 $16,436,056 $22,771,264 $26,395,601 Revenue Totals $15,525,508 $10,667,513 $8,187,139 $14,153,208 Revenue Recovery % 74% 65% 36% 54% Authorized Full Time Positions 186.50 150.50 194.75 194.50 ,74, . -~ ~,:.. ~ -' , ~. " , ,..- - -11 ' " ., v~ I " ... _ \'.., .. ',' " '., ",. ,"RECRIiAIION. ,. . ,I., " f,,"':' , ,,~~ _ _ ~~_ :'-"'-" _='~\ A _.:.~~_I-=;:~,! '<'.\ '. . _ _ _~ _ '__"'J~ _ .:...__ _.d MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Recreation Department is to enrich our community through recreational opportunities and services. SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $4,728,005 $4,421,525 $4,519,978 $3,586,956 Supplies and Services $932,269 $761,607 $628,806 $549,961 Other Expenses $0 $0 $75,970 $3,817 Operating Capital $0 $0 $41,820 $0 Utilities $507,859 $456,836 $517,743 $476,349 Expenditure Totals $6,168,133 $5,639,968 $5,784,317 $4,617,083 Revenue Totals $2,292,665 $2,164,644 $2,277,773 $1,823,077 Revenue Recovery % 37% 38% 39% 39% Authori~~~ Full Time pO;iti~~ 34.00 34.00 1'38.50 26.00 .75. " , - ... ~. A' .- - - -} ~ -. . ~ , , :. " . . , . ;,', '>,lUG R" RY ,"..." , ., l. , ~. .._~ ~_~ ,_~_ . n J1 .""". -", . - _~ _ _..., _ _ ~_ . _ .!.'__" , MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Chula Vista Public Library is to increase knowledge and enrich lives within the community, We accomplish this by connecting people equitably to responsive programs, services and resources in a manner that reflect the ideals of a democratic society, SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT RESOURCES Personnel Services $7,599,379 $6,919,258 $5,955,690 $3,877,859 Supplies and Services $1,667,148 $944,943 $776,601 $881,802 Other Expenses $750 $0 $360 $357 Utilities $374,787 $360,695 $397,049 $374,697 Expenditure Totals $9,642,064 $8,224,896 $7,129,700 $5,134,715 Revenue Totals $2,437,076 $2,081,583 $2,000,620 $347,150 Revenue Recovery % 25% 25% 28% 7% Authorized Full Time Positions 70.75 66.25 I 50.75 40.25 ,76- ("",fl"";- ( >>'""':tL 'I. JI,,). ii' 1'>1'" ~\,~,;.i If. '"..;'., g,!'''''':!dU''1,' I Ii"")!' ,; .' r ,~'~ i't' 'I' "''''1' "......,~ i:l.. -.- II '"'/''''' " ,lifJ.,\ PROPOSED BUDGET DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FU ND -77- DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUND The Development Services fund accounts for revenues and expenditures related to the processing of developmeQt plans and permits. The fund is comprised of three divisions, Planning, Building, and Engineering, which provide direct services to property owners, developers, and the City as required for the entitlement and/or improvement of property. The services provided encompass most development activities, including land use entitlements; public infrastructure, open space, and landscape planning; public infrastructure construction and grading permits; building permits; and inspection of all projects constructed on private property. Historically, all development processing revenues posted to the City's General fund, which also accounted for all development services staffing and associated expenditures. Beginning in fiscal year 2008-09, all development funded staff was budgeted directly in the Development Services fund, with all processing revenues posting to this fund as well. Consolidating all development service cost centers in a single fund clearly isolates development related costs and revenues from General fund supported services; thereby making the nexus between development related activities, costs, fees, and revenues more transparent. This will also assist in identifying any structural imbalances as development fluctuates, with the goal of avoiding impacts to the General fund reserves. The fiscal year 2009-10 budget reflects the transfer of the Public Works function from the Development Services Fund back to the General Fund. As development activity has continued to slide, this staff has largely been reassigned to capital projects, resulting in the decision to transfer this section back to the General Fund. During fiscal year 2008-09, a mid year adjustment was approved by Council to reduce expenditures in the Development Services Fund in response to lower than expected actual fiscal year 2007-08 -79- revenues. The continuing slowdown in development resulted in insufficient revenues to support staffing and budget levels approved with the adoption of the fiscal year 2008-09 budget. In September 2009, a total of 10.5 positions were eliminated from the Development Services Fund. As mentioned previously, the City went through a comprehensive process to develop a budget reduction plan during fiscal year 2008-09 in order bring expenditures in line with projected revenues. As part of the budget reduction plan, Council approved the elimination of an additional 6.5 positions in the Development Services Fund. The staffing in this fund is being further reduced as part of the reorganization of the development and maintenance departments - the Construction Inspection group (10.0 FTE) and Planning and Building Administration (5.0 FTE) staff are being transferred back to the General Fund as part of the fiscal year 2009-10 budget, and 1.0 position is being transferred from the General Fund to the Development Services Fund. REVENUES Development related revenues consist of two categories: development processing fee revenues and deposit based revenues. Development processing fee revenues include building permits, planning fees, other building department fees, and engineering fees. Deposit based revenues are generated through staff time reimbursements related to specific projects. The table below provides a comparison of the projected revenues for fiscal year 2008-09 to the proposed fiscal year 2009-10 revenues. The fiscal year 2008-09 projected revenues reflect the slowdown in development that was experienced during the fiscal year, the fiscal year 2008-09 Council Adopted budget included revenues of $10.9 million. Development Services Fund Revenues Licenses and Permits Revenue from Other Agencies Charges for Services Other Revenue Transfers In Total .:...,...~.:.J..~~m $ 952,234 $ 1,085,854 $ $ 2,304 $ $ $ 3,784,697 $ 3,521,212 $ 2,073,009 $ 888,915 $ 414,500 $ 362,050 $ 7,226,744 $ 5,658,031 A summary of the notable changes by category are listed below:. . Licenses and Permits - The increase in this category reflects an anticipated increase in workload resulting in permit related revenue. -80- . Revenue from Other Agencies - The decrease in this category reflects the elimination of one-time grant revenue received in fiscal year 2008-09. . Charges for Services - The decrease in this category reflects the transfer of the Construction Inspection group from development services to the General Fund ($763,000) offset by an anticipated increase in workload resulting in additional deposit based revenues and plan checking fees. . Other Revenue - The decrease in this category reflects the transfer of the Construction Inspection group from development services to the General Fund ($794,000). It also reflects the elimination of one-time reimbursement revenues offset by an increase in funding from SDG&E partnership grant and CIP reimbursements. . Transfers In - The reduction in this category is related to the transfer of the Construction Inspection group from the development services to the General Fund. The remaining budget largely reflects the Council approved General Fund subsidy of water heater and gas line replacement and photovoltaic permits. EXPENDITURES The fiscal year 2009-10 budget includes funding for 39.0 positions, a reduction of 31.0 positions when compared to the fiscal year 2008-09 adopted budget. This reflects the transfer of Planning and Building Administration (5.0 FTE) and Construction Inspection (10.0 FTE) to the General Fund, the elimination of 17.0 positions in order to bring expenditures in line with projected revenues, and the transfer of 1.0 position from the General Fund to the Development Services Fund. As illustrated in the following table, expenditures in the Development Services fund are weighted toward staffing, much the same as the City's overall budget. Transfers-out reimburse the General fund for citywide and departmental overhead for all three divisions and departmental overhead for the Planning and Building divisions. Citywide overhead includes support costs associated with Finance, Human Resources, Information Technology Services, Custodial Services, and City Attorney. -81- Development Services Fund Expenditures Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other EXpenses Transfers Out Utilities Total -35% -42% 17% -34% 6% -35% A summary of the notable changes by category are listed below: . Personnel Services - The reduction in this category largely reflects the elimination or transfer of 31.0 positions from this fund as well as the elimination of the cost of living adjustments scheduled for January 2009 and January 2010. . Supplies and Services - The reduction in this category largely reflects transfer of Construction Inspection to the General Fund. . Other Expenses - The increased budget in this category is for credit card transaction fees; the development services counter began accepting credit cards mid year, the additional expense reflects the annualized costs of this fee. . Transfers Out - The reduction in transfers out reflects a reduction in the transfer from the Development Services Fund to the General Fund for overhead costs; the reduced overhead charges reflects the elimination or transfer of 31.0 positions from this fund. . Utilities - The increase in this category reflects anticipated rate increases somewhat offset by the transfer of Construction Inspection to the General Fund. -82- '. UE""BLOJ>.MEN,T .SERVICES fU NO' .' ; " 2.36; ; . . A _ _, _ ... ~ ~ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Utilities Transfers Out TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Licenses and Permits Revenue from Other Agencies Charges for Services Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o o o o o $0 o [~,dI,2?2:789;;j[Ji::i~6.Qi?J'28Q] l~"l':" :~I"12'-2'''7~::3'''7''9''',IF;:C''''"ml''1''3.1'':-0' 0'"8~ o L:L':;:i~i;:"-"",,,~'.....,l,';;,;,iUl1JJL;;;;;;Jf1;~,,,;.,!i.,"".,,,,<,~ o ,"1 ;~;:~;" ;:'::r,256''!lli1;''Ii:'''',\;,Ii1!'''B:-48''iFi ,~...u."...,...",;~....~,."...". ,,.,....w C>". ~:;" <,,,t,lI;;,,,.,,.,....,,,,,,,,...,..;. ,,,,,;] ':1'''''1'' """"11'11'" '~'''''''17i;~ 1!!7'lF'T' "';+ "~'~M" -"""'j-;I o [jLji.JULJ&;' 6?lllilo~i'>'~~!;I;J;;;i5L~2Zdll o ~~.;~C::t!~9~~:~~~ji;i:l~ilGm;fJIT!!9:Z:~~;:~~,~i~ $0 $8,956,512 $5,831,292 o o o o o $0 11'"'' .",.". . '"''',''''' mI"" ,,",,",,. ""'''''''''1/ o Lj~JW;i'Jj!t..~?f,!.g,~,~m,~lbLtILL1:;q~~j.?E::!~'j o f\t}7~r.;l 'il,V~jC)4~t.J, !;;r!],t'"'1~4:';J!'~1 r~:"61'1'1 lL.ij~;,...;>;,.,',,;;,, ,;;. .,. ~""'''m',.i;;. .!.I;,';,<,;,i1JL",,;,:','<I, l;.,)""'...,,.J,' o n:;,,:; 3:784':69 7.ilIT~,";'J3:'52l\2121~ o 1i27;?,~]]IQQ9~~:;5it?t~!~1~~ 'T';;';"'""4."1' '4'.~5-0mO"~r ;;P?J"I,~r3"'6"2"rO"'5" "a." o l::.f''''; l' '" .' .Il":~ ",/.,. , ''j .lil.~u."",,,,,,,,".~.. ,,,, '.........". ..., ",,,,j, "~""'''_''. .~"~-' .....011 $0 $7,226,744 $5,858,031 ~''''.".''''''f''...,~"." ""':r:"':;''-'''"''~'' ""~"~"!"T;;"r;lrr;;:!;::,(i!1i:'iim;I~~!HllT~~'n;71!<!~I;t'...!~p!.~FiP,,'r:lITiWi:":..'.;d"~"";:i;'.~!~;::rF1':nr;fir...i'.';i'i".......~i;:rHir!i'''...'':l~'''.''.''T'''..-...'''!ll~,l:r.'::~::al~~"$"~rmlr.""'''''I:~' ; IN EJ!, ~ U N D lACTIVITiY;di"{.II..j'fi'.;.,JI'I'''':':;:,i!;''II~t' '" ;.!';,i!IF:"',i'lj''!dj'i;':': .;ii''',',!""" $O,i<!<lh.ik,;:/',~,J"\'V';;i'~il.$O:T)I.:!,, ($11;729 ;-7,68), 1]11f;':i'tQ,I,,',!I; 26,-739. 1.::~"ilm!.olt;..W.~l:.lll;;.~&.d~uw.;UJ:.J.<;j,,:zl.t!..<.;,i .~"., "'>'~J.iIll:iJWJj u..ol;:~~.:..~:t,;"J;..,l"~~li;~,;.~;'..lJ..lI~,,,,;,~'rilH_l+oIJ,.l.,,<...l..il.:.;.;.~;;;jjj;;_~'h.:LJ1,jJ.:;...;ii;;1:;~lt,;.;;.;;; ,83, .DEv,HOPMrfNl SERVICES,HJND. . . ~ ~., ,_ ,'236 ':i STAFFING SUMMARY - 236 Administrative Technician Assistant Director of Building & Housing Assistant Director of Planning Assistant Planner Associate Engineer Associate Planner Building Inspector 111I Building Inspector III Deputy Building Official Development Automation Specialist Development Planning Manager Development Services Counter Manager Development Services Technician 1/11 Development Services Technician III Director of Planning & Building Engineering Technician I1II Landscape Architect Landscape Inspector (txfr'd from PW and eliminated) Landscape Planner 111I 3.00 C'~;';:,:~:;IQ.oJ.J.:! ~1:i~~~~:~i~I~S~ervisor 0.50 (0.50) ~;;[~!j~i;!~:!~~~!:;~:!~!'1 Plans Examiner 3.00 t'!:}!Er:;~~:6_dJJ,;: Principal Management Analyst ".,!iii!!i":~U:iii;fm;Jfi~.iUii:!?T! Principal Planner 3.00 (1 00) r=iffi::;,2q:g',\'U.] Public Works Inspector 1/11 500 (5 00) ~:'!~U;::':~.!'fiL.:,i! Secretary 1.00 :U:!D;ii\.6:i1rI!iiI:',Qgi!:,':'''Ui Senior Administrative Secretary 1.00 (1 00) IfL:::J'::~::~::!~::"'::.i Senior Building Inspector 100 E":ii",":jTgO'i",: ~:~:~~ ~~~Ii~en;r:~:e;echnician ~.~~ (2.00) :!,I':1!r:;!:1::!!:'{:~~',!\ Senior Landscape Inspector 1.00 (1 00) ,':II,'FS!::!!:i![i:"[' Senior Office Specialist 1.00 JiiE:FT!(j1~;fI,~.[q''':ET:;: Senior Planner 5.00 (1.00) ::~,,,:~:I;::!i'.2iF:'.) Senior Plans Examiner 1 00 (1.00)':':ii.J:;:;'''::.:,?'':;:T'' Senior Public Works Inspector 3.00 (300) U!'.i:!(!!!,r:I,::!,'!,""I"",:i I' ""'"L."'" ..,-,,"- "~, Senior Secretary 2.00 (2.00)'d',.1",)'" "." L! ":!'li'",;.:':"1r"'j"''''''''".,,':;I'I' Transportation Engineer w/Certificate 1,00 - - .,::, ii,' i:':J OO,'J 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 500 7,00 100 1.00 100 1,00 100 4.50 3.00 1,00 100 1,00 ,84, (1.00) (1.00) (2.00) (1.00) (100) (1,00) (2.50) (1,00) (1.00) ", 'Ii "Ji" . 't>.' t'j' 'I' "1""""1". " "~l, . .,' ,. ",~ll ,. lI'1'<''';''''~''~!l.[ V"l -,I",' I"",. ,,~ JI iii 'j" ',1\'1''' .,~'f~,.... '4.....t... J'L:!...Pb :;1, :;;)Jll;;r~;; '!I'~'1;C ,II' II' :~. ..... ~'..! ';~ .....,...,"'.'" II't ",j(/;jj;" '." fl'" 'ii ),,' 'jf, "'11~, f t:,l "",;& /I. j;",m !'I llJj i""ih 'i'~J J~ ~ :l~ ~i ~Ql~\' ~~,A~ ":~....d ~ m.,,,,. 10 t:;..loJ' ';' ~ ... PROPOSED BUDGET REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING fUNDS Redevelopment Agency Funds Housing Authority Funds -85.. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS The Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency was created on October 24, 1972 by City Council Ordinance. The goals of the Redevelopment Agency are to reduce blight and to encourage new development, reconstruction, and rehabilitation of residential, commercial, industrial, and retail uses. Since the Agency's creation, the City has adopted and amended six project areas to encompass a total of approximately 3,563 acres of City territory. Current land uses within these areas are mostly commercial and industrial, but also include residential (primarily high and medium-high density) and public uses (e.g., governmental administrative centers, corporation yards, streets, etc.). In 1979 and 2000, the City financially merged the various project areas into two primary configurations: (1) the Merged BayfronUTown Centre I Redevelopment Project Area (1979) and (2) the Merged Chula Vista Redevelopment Project Area (2000). The merger of project areas allows the Agency to pool tax increment revenues generated in different project areas and leverage them appropriately to create benefit for the entire merged project area. The Agency receives tax increment revenues resulting from increases in the assessed valuation within the redevelopment project areas over the base year assessed valuation. -87- The RDA focuses on the development of sustainable neighborhoods through a variety of investments such as. . Crime reduction through elimination of blight, . Improve infrastructure and public facilities, . Provide funds for valuable public services, . Support small business and enhance jOb opportunities, . Revive business districts and downtowns FUND DESCRIPTIONS The Agency budget is organized into two distinct groupings of funds. The groupings are Redevelopment Agency Project Area Funds and Debt Service Funds. The Project Area Funds are the primary operating funds for the Redevelopment Agency. The Debt Service funds are used to pay for Agency debt service on its outstanding Tax Allocation Bonds, Certificates of Participation and the Advances and other debt of the Agency. Fund 611 and 651 Redevelopment Proiect Area Funds The Project Area Funds are the primary operating funds for the Redevelopment Agency. This fund accounts for revenue received from tax increment within the redevelopment project areas and is used to fund operating expenditures, statutory and negotiated pass through payments, and Agency capital projects. Debt Service Funds The Debt Service funds are used to pay for Agency debt service on its outstanding Tax Allocation Bonds, Certificates of Participation and the Advances and other debt of the Agency. Fund 689 - RDA 2000 Tax Allocation Bonds This is the Redevelopment Agency 2000 Tax Allocation Bonds (Merged Redevelopment Project) in the amount of $17,000,000 The Merged Redevelopment Project was created on August 22, 2000, pursuant to an amendment to the redevelopment plans for three of the Agency's four existing redevelopment projects, the Town Centre II Project Area, the Otay Valley Project Area and the Southwest Project Area. The Bonds wer!3 issued to provide funds for the repayment of certain obligations of the Merged Redevelopment Project and other interfund loans, and for general redevelopment purposes. The term of the Bonds is through the year 2030. This debt was refunded in 2008, becoming Fund 697 - RDA 2008 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds. -88- Fund 697 - RDA 2008 Tax Allocation Refundinq Bonds This is a refunding of the Redevelopment Agency 2000 Tax Allocation Bonds (Merged Redevelopment Project) in the amount of $21,625,000. The Merged Redevelopment Project was created on August 22, 2000, pursuant to an amendment to the redevelopment plans for three of the Agency's four existing redevelopment projects, the Town Centre II Project Area, the Otay Valley Project Area and the Southwest Project Area. The Merged Project Area was amended in 2004 adding 494 acres. The Bonds were issued to provide funds for the repayment of certain obligations of the Merged Redevelopment Project and other interfund loans, and for general redevelopment purposes. The term of the Bonds is through the year 2036. Fund 695 - 2006 Senior Tax Allocation Refundinq Bonds, Series A In July 2006, the Redevelopment Agency issued the 2006 Senior Tax Allocation Bonds, Series A in the amount of $13,435,000 to refinance the Agency's outstanding BayfronUTown Centre Redevelopment Project 1994 Senior Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Series A (the "1994 A Bonds). The original bonds were issued to finance improvements in the BayfronUTown Centre Project Areas. The Annual Debt Service is paid from property tax increment generated in the project areas. The term of the bonds runs through 2027. Fund 696 - 2006 Subordinate Tax Allocation Refundino Bonds, Series B In July 2006, the Redevelopment Agency issued the 2006 Subordinate Tax Allocation Bonds, Series B in the amount of $12,325,000 to refinance the Agency's outstanding BayfronUTown Centre Redevelopment Project 1994 Senior Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Series D (the "1994 D Bonds) and the 1994 Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series C (the 1994 C Bonds) The original bonds were issued to finance improvements in the BayfronUTown Centre Project Areas. The Annual Debt Service is paid from property tax increment generated in the project areas. The term of the bonds runs through 2021. Fund 693 - 2005 Taxable Revenue Bonds Series A - CRA/ERAF Loan Proqram In April 2005, the Agency entered into a Loan Agreement with the California Statewide Communities Development Authority to borrow the amount of $765,000. This amount was used to pay the Agency's portion of the 2005' Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) to the County of San Diego pursuant to Section 33681.12 of the California Health and Safety Code. -89- Fund 694 - 2006 Taxable Revenue Bonds Series A - CRAJERAF Loan Proqram In April 2006. the Agency entered into a Loan Agreement with the California Statewide Communities Development Authority to borrow the amount of $930,000. This amount was used to pay the Agency's portion of the 2006 Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) to the County of San Diego pursuant to Section 33681.12 of the California Health and Safety Code. REVENUES The table below provides a comparison of the budgeted revenues for fiscal year 2008-09 to the proposed fiscal year 2009-10 revenues. 11,034.662 $ 650,723 $ 2,542 S 25.000 $ 772.296 $ 1,492,586 $ 13.977,809 $ 11,451,978 $ 206,609 $ $ $ $ 4,703,743 $ 16,362,330 $ 14.725,385 25.000 Property Taxes $ Use of Money & Property $ Charges for Services $ Development Impact Fees $ Other Revenue $ Transfers In $ Total Revenues $ !':;"';iF:""'...:,......,;,'j':',',;.:~li~'",'<,'"'~, ;;-r~l(;U'J~l.~~;J:t,i. 30,000 6,784,423 21,564,808 28.6% -879% 0.0% 00% 100.0% 44.2% 31.8% A summary of the notable changes by category are listed below: . Property Taxes - The increase in this category reflects the projected increase in property tax increment revenue for fiscal year 2009-10. . Use of Money & Property - The decrease represents reduced cash reserves of the operating funds and the low interest rate environment of the market. . Other Revenue - The increase in this category reflects the addition of CIP staff time reimbursements. . Transfers In - The increase in this category reflects budgeted transfers for a loan repayment to the City's General Fund. -90- EXPENDITURES The fiscal year 2009-10 budget includes funding for 4.0 positions, a reduction of 6.0 positions when compared to the fiscal year 2008-09 adopted budget. This reduction of personnel provides for the transfer of 1.0 position to the General Fund and the elimination of 5.0 positions in order to reduce operating expenditures. )';,': 1:; i' ';;::'!";;;:"'''';~1' :~'~ Personnel Services $ 818,621 $ 989,894 $ 612,947 -381% Supplies and Services $ 562,978 $ 519,103 $ 639,450 23.2% Other Expenses $ 9,995,461 $ 10,879,649 $ 7,757,387 -28.7% Transfers Out $ 2,554,978 $ 6,314,681 $ 13,662,067 116.4% CIP Project Expenditures $ 104,419 $ 221,364 $ 1,025,000 363.0% Non-CIP Project Expenditures $ $ $ 300,000 1000% Utilities $ 723 $ 1,300 $ 500 -61.5% Total Ex enditures $ 14,037,180 $ 18,925,991 $ 23,997,351 26.8% A summary of the notable changes by category are listed below: . Personnel Services - The reduction in this category largely reflects the elimination or transfer of 6.0 positions from the Redevelopment Agency funds as well as the elimination of the cost of living adjustments scheduled for January 2009 and January 2010. . Supplies and Services - The increase in this category is due to an increase in Professional Services expenditures. . Other Expenses - The decrease in this category reflects a reduction in city staff time reimbursements as well as a reduction in pass through payments to other agencies. . Transfers Out - The increase in this category reflects transfers from the operating funds to a debt fund and the corresponding transfer from the debt fund to the City's General Fund for a loan repayment. The increase also reflects a transfer from the operating funds to Housing for the low and moderate housing set-aside . The increase in this category reflects a change in budgeting methods for FY' 2009-1 0 and a transfer out to the General Fund for a loan repayment. In years past, 20% of tax increment revenue was budgeted directly in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (LMIHF). - . - - The new practice will provide for gross tax increment revenue to be fully budgeted in the redevelopment agency operating funds with an amount equal to 20% of tax increment transferred out to the LMIHF. . CIP Project Expenditures - The increase in this category reflects an additional $0.8 million for street improvements within the project areas. -91- . Non-CIP Project Expenditures - The increase in this category reflects the establishment of three projects (Bayfront, Third Avenue, and the Southwest Specific Plan) to capture staff time reimbursements for work on those projects.. . Utilities - The decrease in this category reflects the reduction in the phone service budget to estimated prior year actual expenditures. Note: The tables included in the revenue and expenditure summary reflect the operating funds and debt service funds for the Redevelopment Agency. The following fund summary report reflects only the operating funds; the debt service funds are included in the Debt Service Fund section of this document. -92- .' REDEVEtOPME'Nl AG~N<;Y fU:ND ' d ~ ,," .' '6Q(tJ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Utilities Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures Non-CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Property Taxes Use of Money & Property Charges for Services Development Impact Fees Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 61 515,152 6,133,861 3,335 5,749,708 172,420 o $12,574,537 6,076,772 598,006 o o 58,391 4,000,347 $10,733,516 818,621 552,187 3,875,476 723 2,554,978 104,419 o $7,906,404 6,353,413 295,952 2,542 25,000 764,631 o $7,441,538 >'I,I'r.; !,I":~" .,,, '''~I''~''''''''',:/ 'T'!r.:<'r:"""m""".,~ ..,,~~ .;"1 L~~i.,,;; ~~,Q,9,ijt:~::J] 'J: R:1 ~\,9'G,;J ril?-';-iT5--04-'1--0'=3'~'l1" ;-1lf=62' 9 4'5'Q'1'. ,LL;w;.,;)~l., ;,,,.;,,.!..;,~,w...!tJ ~~:iG:'.:..:jl.rL..,...~_.,,~l "',~, ,"<11' 'n:!!,':""'; "",n."._.....M.-;;',,,'''"'''''t'~''';:'..:'.''..'l'..,,..,,. {~i:Ji~1:2ifi9.:r:3Z.92J.,}L:J:!~j!<~.;.9,~~,,1t9.?,iis: 1'1'-:-7''''-,';;:'''1 :-:'-0"0": i,~~:7irllllr.iiF~ 500-'~ IF.L~j~.dL:,,,~.......,,~_:jCL;.l~5bJ&lljj:Ju:.....,-..J'':~ "'''',:1'5':'1-5-''8''-8--8''4''"'1 ';-111~:,'1""0'" '3.6....4"1:2--2.5 ! _.,;;;h,ij,;"",',:.,q....,,,...,"'..,,;,,,,.:..::."_t,i;uL,,M,,,'. ;'.;;,,,i,,.',,.,,,,,,.,.,.,,,,,~ """Pl'-:,~I'''22-''1r3'6''''4'''': ,,';':"''0''1'' "0' "2'''''5' 00"'0" 7 : ~"""1If:;,t~;:' _. ;--.......,;d WU;:;.:.~...............:..............lij i'l .' I Ii '-', !' Ii' II'" o,rlpj',f1F:'i" , 300' 000 ~ ,LJ~JI~iJi:;:";',,1i,,;litJ!',.., ,,::~ L,~:...i ::1;..11. 'w ,_,' .....".J,';i $12,743,248 $15,980,928 ;'Ffi 4S-j:'97S 1,'''llilWi72S1138S''r ~L!.En";~.,J.k!__=.",i!ij!:;rU...W.i;!.,,:..;.....!_,....,,,;:;:;,)l r;-:':O::::ii!132 609i:Q[TI' ;'~'1:1~;12-5rOO'-0"';'ij .,:, .,,:, ."t.., , . "." "'" ,-.:.1'1; l . "j "~lu_~,~..,,, _.....~..,"'-...,~".,' ....,dl...ll.i'.h."." ."...... """",_ .~,. , ,~::mrrli'Ii8mm::ITmrl)fiF;o'.::j :n:Ji!~~w;;i:::,;mi;~iilrom;F'5':;1 .-"1.1"" JL,,,,;, ,;.,:.;.;.,,,,.ll.~.,,~,.:. ,:, ,,,~l..'."'llWk.h,,)]jllllit>;,.,,,.; .,," ';."':"ft~'[:r- ".~.:' "'II1':1lmtm'~"""-' ''lH.r;'C~,:~,,~, ""'1l'l)r'11-" -r ,', !~II"!" 'i~+lk;,,\;, ,! '111~1 O;ijl..l.~:il,:,,"','jWli, '~"t l;,;~ Oii'i Ei~~b;ill..d..:.' .,....;;.,;.""...,.;,..., ~'~~~;Will;!~~:L[;0r:~1i[TImml:.~QCq:Q9?1! "~I''''"'''II'!"""'unm"w,,w'~'''''''''''''''~''!:\I'''T''''''''''''''''l!''''_",n"",' ;:." ',," ,Ii" 855; 797 ,-:;''',:,,~I., ,: 800: 000 -:J' i:;..llI...... . .....__.....~,'l~c.,.~.;""JII:;;.Jk"'...,.........;.........".. $12,440,384 $15,580,385 :'NET:i'FU"N'D'!:A cTlv'fT;Y'~;i~~j;lmUiji,:"q!,;:'li~li~;l~J(/,";j'!;iJl!:,!rr,irl;~:g;~i:"$Tl84'1""!;021'~'!iii1m::ri;"'$4'64~'8'6'6'':'!);i;j~r1r$30i2t!864"'iti,;i;J!l~1~F"$'400F54'3" i! ',.." ,.,'" "">.,, '" " j '"''''''.,''''' . .".".,..cJ..,J..I. "f.1"""'o.ll';':,.:.,.,.,;, ,i. ..IJ' Ol( ",I...". .... ......,,( .1.,. ".,,' ';. ..,..l,.....,.......,,,,,, ( . <. ..",,, ,. ,. .. l.. ..l...1~11~ ( ~,_.._ ,....,,'..;, "wi..--"- ';i.,h,;" C..,......".."" " "ll') .............."'" .,,""'....__~n'..'.......~ . ...wRld......._.... ...!l,...._~....._.........~___,................,~_.............~~"...............,..-.-.......___.,,_""_ ~~ FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 611 Redev BayfrontITown Centre I 641 Redev Fine Arts 651 So West/Twn Ctr 1l/0ty Vly 652 RDA 2000 TABs Project Fund 653 RDA 2008 TARBS Project Fund TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 611 Redev Bayfront/Town Centre I 641 Redev Fine Arts 651 So West/Twn Clr Il/Oty Vly 652 RDA 2000 TABs Project Fund TOTAL REVENUES 3,655,452 o 8,875,960 43,125 o $12,574,537 3,305,390 209 3,384,520 4,043,397 $10,733,516 2,675,922 o 4,386,982 843,500 o $7,906,404 2,194,130 26,616 5,099,112 121,680 $7,441,538 1':: '1;1;' 4 i4406~3'j':::Iifl1i"5,r652''(ro f':1 :i..,ii.lLI.t.I" , "'''''''.'''''''''M,;c,''''.J uILilll~,~, ' ,p '''>' ;"" I" .,,,,,. 'w....:~ "'-'''~''''I"''''''''''''''''''''"''~I"''''M'''''mtH'''''--''''''>'''1"1""""""'] , ""'1 h,'p"""""'''j,'; '0"'''''''' f"'I"~;; ;""'J" H'O'" ,....;' 'P' .., "'It .. "',. """'41''li~!JI ,,,,; , . ,I ,....\>. ".-" " I" ," ". ' lL ,1'",) ,'3-Ji,!~"'jiJ.l"1.~j!;,,,,: .,;,:1, " r;::"1:~~9'9 '1l51fl!~'9'52i3921~ b:....I~,b"L~ ",_ '1_.'......."...;;,., [:'!j...,.....'~"'"''',J.,_;,..."L:;~ !~:;[~'jmiHlmi!.f:;.:1ml~im:LQ,,::;ls[1~iQillj)j.;::;1ii:!jJ!illnillj1~Q:m: r'li}f?''i;;;lt~i~!ar5jil~~:~srn::;8(55TO'OO;~; ~fu,~.:w.ul.o~d;' ..1, ~_.~__,...;w $12,743,248 $15,980,928 ,-r"'''''' """ .."..'Trr---.-"".......,~'-'-''1 , ,,;:J~,~',449.c9.?..3. .',;}:hlli".t;, 82? 'Jl?f: ";'t'":,:iM"" .. ""'''" ')!'''llrt~~ww;;:.11'~rrti~:')::~:.-..'t111~j~!..':r "-, ;:~:. ,;!I'I,II'" '1' 'nlr;tl',;'O"':L' l!!'f!!II")I","""",,".',:,,! !'!l;." O'~~ aJ"'I"'.:!."";'>"''''-'''''' ',,' '.-,-. luelil""",,'>".w1'" .:.'" ',',. l!1~ I' 7111)l'T1f0~r-;r:'ii1j'r58:,'2'2'3'li ";~."-..,;"~;",.:!..."...;,...!_,..,~,,,<'i.,I...~_;"J..,,,~,,,,;,,,,,..,;,........_)J:1 cm;il(i1~1r'!'i;';;!:;',jll,'ll':!~0"':m \i!:r';\r:f~lmumEn'::IJi~irtr-n~~O' ;:if ^,.... '1". .."..".,...1-, 1.k .' "'.' "'" "m........,,,,I. '1'11" '- ,.;",J. "~Jlll'",, ." ".._,h]",~.~....^, l.i".IT.l.UL;.,....."""'" ,,'.""'''.'''; $12,440,384 $15,580,385 ~~"."".. ."!". "" "''''''",...".".,...-'...-............. ,,-...~. ;r:;!fl?-',1"'j\Pi.,IF~!T....'..I"~:"....:<'!T..:....~ ""'_"::"'~"'" ~""'l"'" "... I'..""".."."e.~>-'.-T.-, ....-.to...." -'il""" ,,.. ". '.-.:"""l';"'<'~ :'""'...,...,',..""..."';.'..,,,....._"'~.~~:'" ":l''TI'''-'1''''l''''''y. -'''''''''''''''1 NE:f.'FUND;ACTlVITY'::"~;,', ':::,1111,.,,;'" "::;II,!'::,:" ($1',841,021)' : :'![,($464,86~)' :;:.il" ($302:,864)-:,,:";i:~: ($40P,~43): ",";ll.I;lJ"'\'.~'"",,,;'.,U'llUl."i";';';;''''';,,,,,,,,,r,.;,-"..",,,,,,,,LI'''''''';;'''''''li,liih..;!,,,,...........,,,,,,,,,,tJ..".j.;,.....M''',''''''''''';'';''!!",_'-:'',\,,,,~,,,,,,,,,,, ..,'\i.,.'.....,,;.;."L':;""',w.lI"'~,,".',. .u".""..",.1I,I.,..;",.".i.f.ml.;.ll<~','", .",,,111..1.\,,,11,....,,,,1,(1\,),,,,,,,,,,,,,," ,,'" -93- If"" ~lY'OfF 1;\ . 1 '\1', '_M',,'" C" ,} ",C"'..', (.." """H"'."'''''J!L0 'n v';' '~..'S.1"':''0~':'''''''~. . '''q'' '}\' "", tA' , ,,,: . > Ii " Ii' r, :,'~", j. -'I ~:' d _. "!<.'" ", ~ ,l ,';;".\ -94- HOUSING AUTHORITY FUNDS The Housing Authority was formed in 1993. A Housing Authority can provide tax-exempt bond financing, own and operate housing, and operate various housing programs. The Chula Vista Housing Authority does not own or operate housing, and the Section 8 rental assistance programs including Public Housing are operated in Chula Vista by the County of San Diego Housing Authority. The staff of the Housing Authority provides comprehensive housing services for the City. The Housing Funds are comprised of the Chula Vista Housing Authority, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Housing Program Fund and Low and Moderate Housing Fund. The Chula Vista Housing Authority fund is the clearinghouse for all housing related staff activity. Personnel expenses are budgeted here, and are reimbursed by various other funds such as the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, and CDBG Fund. The City's CDBG Housing Program Fund includes costs for loans to low-income families for housing rehabilitation. The Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund accounts for a statutorily required 20 percent set-aside of tax increment revenue earned by the Agency for development of affordable housing. As tax increment revenues are generated in redevelopment project areas, 20 percent of the gross revenue stream is immediately set aside and placed in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Those funds, pooled with other federal and state resources and tax credits, provide an important financing tool to assist in the development of income-restricted, affordable housing projects. The Housing Funds will receive $1.0 million in staff time reimbursements for administering the City's Housing, CDBG, HOME and other grants and for monitoring of bond covenants for affordable housing bonds issued by the City's Housing Authority. -95- The Housing Authority focuses on the development of sustainable neighborhoods through a variety of investments such as: . Production of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities . Revive business districts and downtowns . Clean-up of contaminated properties . Neighborhood beautification such as upgrading facades and sidewalks FUND DESCRIPTIONS The Housing Authority budget is a clearinghouse for several Housing Funds. Housinq Funds The Housing Funds are comprised of the Chula Vista Housing Authority, CDBG Housing Program Fund and Low and Moderate Housing Fund. Fund 313 Chula Vista Housinq Authoritv The Chula Vista Housing Authority accounts for all housing related activities not considered eligible for reimbursement by the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Fund 311 CDBG Housinq Proqram Fund The CDBG Housing Program Fund accounts for the revolving loan program (Community Housing Improvement Program) that lends money to low-income families for housing rehabilitation. Fund 317 Low and Moderate Income Housinq Fund The Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund accounts for the statutorily required 20% set- aside of tax increment revenue earned by the Agency for development of affordable housing. -96- ; "~H (}) 8.s n~:<5\ :PRO'C Rl\M fUN [); '.' . ~. . . ,; :".'" - 3~Hr i . ,'>" _'.. _-___ .1.____ ~...~ _____ _. ~ .. __j FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Utilities Transfers Out Non-CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Property Taxes Use of Money & Property Charges for Services Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o 88,598 475,863 100,362 o 299,079 o $963,902 2,294,709 391,618 58,897 7,337 1,124 $2,753,685 611,220 75,919 5,637,944 87,559 466 1,733 8,960 $6,423,801 2,758,665 556,304 95,450 768,383 o $4,178,802 [':~"';":S2T3~'-5-;r7:;1"i328856;j:l .',,,,",,,,:J,".~,,.......!....,,,,..~,,,.L<~.......,.............,............,,.Ja liI;'7:-:: ,270"OS(FTr':":';,270 080 'i ;',. .. .".,!,.,i,....;<,,", .;... !,....... ".,,,;l!~~,m~,,~;' """i"'''''''-'',!k"-,;,,,,,';'x,l . ...,......... . '111~V.:i'" . ......... . ,;. ,:.1,t..2..4,?1,4:;J~b,"!:!Jll"Q.99lj .---.....-.,........."--J r.~-'-m~"'''''''''-]j' ,. '.., "'''6 000 """.~,. ""'6000' Lt.i~.:Jh.jt.,.L;-;."",: ~"n:~B~"!~'~_'M'" fji!~;~ijli[~gr~".. :'i[[::0iJtdl;,~)'$"1:i : ':-;::;2'75,84292]:1 38::' , ........_.... ,......_, ....,-.............j 1"l"~''''H-OT'"-:''''' . "W','" .' :'"I~:t"R!~m>+3j;]?'r----''':I~ .1f:,4j.F:,':':J ,~!);!lt ~::::, 0, i" ,:~,j:, :,.:rJ;1't~" ,h i !;.; 0 ~,' i .,-,~;,-...-...;""...Jl:.,..........;.;...J;""'~~""'_~04;"--.I $2,610,301 $6,489,660 1 ",,1"2''';"6-9''6''5801'' ':,....,.,......' ",,' '!"'O"J' """"'''''.-, , ''1.,..,l".:..,."il,_,!l,..';I'''-'':'; ,. .."" .,.c... ,..... , ".."..,. _...,.......".,.m,ICi.J, """ ,.,. ., .. :;iiiUllif33 :'169'i'l :::;;':,; <:':11;1"8;636; 1 ,...,.,..-..m,Wl Wi~'k,'... .",,=~,!ll ..I,~,p"..,..,.., .,lj"""'~-,"",h' "nJ Ii ;",I""li"'63 442';;1 ~lq~i~li:;63"442:11 1-:;.;1~;"1'iLi6h'__'-,j,............t:i~ ' "').......'J.,.........Ju r::;r~ -'-@;!;l r.'''''''='==...._~ry "',.".",' 949000!. '..,.;,,1"016'341" ,.....,'.....,. " ,. ,,' ". '...'.. , ,.,..1; n.._.. .,.._.J~ I...."",,,,,, "'u...."'(, ;..lL.."I~,...., ."".h..."",~,~,>....~" . k :',!::iIi~:~~, 71Q:r@~i~:.7,Q~;1\,~~6:: $3,900,931 $8,120,065 ""~"~""'__h""",...,,,,,,,, -~,.,....._,.....-..""t''}':illf.!I':'.i'J1::1'''-'11~'~r:llr::rlt!''',"",lr<;''m~Ir-:mnll-''''''''''''''''''''''''''.''''''' '''''''''''1-''''~-'-'''~'><'1t''''''''''''''''''j~1~".~1''''~!'''!'''''''''~'-'-'-,";:1t~"""'1""''''I''''''''''!I'l'j'''''''''''1'1 NET..F,UND'ACTIVITy.....II:.II"lli"'I:i": """11,,,,,11:11',,::' ."'i'n':il.!',,: $1;789,783 ":"':($2;244;999)' . $1';290,630:' .II'" $1,630;405:,1 ; .l'.. :,,, "j:._,JI:;lJj,"I',,-,,;,-_,,., ,;""Ill!IlJ;;;lim,."'!''-''''''''';' ,IUIIJ,;.", ,:,:",..-"..."]..,~"d",,"L',.,,_,,.,.:i.il;(P.li-I.lll,:,l..'''''''''';'-''''''U'':W;'~:'""", ,. ".,.,:,\~;..I" .~,,,',,, "v)".,'ahjjh~..;,I"','",.,..",,,i.u,,~l1l;c;,,,,,,.,,,,-,..,,.l\'."",L:ll,,,,,,,;,;,-,,,.;,-,,W;ldla~,i.:,,-,,,,,,,;,:, FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 313 CV Housing Authority 315 RDA Housing Program 317 RDA Low & Mod Income Housing TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 313 CV Housing Authority 315 RDA Housing Program 317 RDA Low & Mod Income Housing TOTAL REVENUES 37,044 431,059 495,799 $963,902 63,109 24,624 2,665,952 $2,753,685 611,954 157,453 5,654,394 $6,423,801 734,205 167,251 3,277,346 $4,178,802 V? ..:,,1 ,024':fi6"S111p(""1\o'2'iili3o!"'1 "''-., '", ".,JIII,;""""w,"_ ",'.__.;,.,;,~l", !:i~!~;,.",.,.,.;"."",,,,,....,,,,,,,,,, ",';".~ "':lil"liCW.., . "0'''11111''..... 3920'1600 ~,L:.ji..1ill2!tlJ~;;;::;\i<t::.....:Iii UUlJ.j~~,.., ,,"....-., ~........._~~l !;r;I;'J~ 1 :585;:4'36 "1J1i:1C!~ 1';'5411;43"6111 Li..."" ,.. .""'. " ...........l_""'-....,._.~.,.~ $2,610,301 $6,489,660 ["F :f17'iT182~'11l'~~"3..52":955..' :;.:.i-,',.~~"......_.'!.;;_.,;:J!:J;.l:.b.lt(i"'.;"......,.. '......_,"':>J ~""'""''''-''Itl'-!I''''~'''''~'' '~.l"I...ll.~'I!(.. "'l'~..'lilllm:""'"'....g H'G:y.i!;1i,~j'\;n,:,T.'IO.,;; {!{,!:'g!.,:','\ii[;':';'i HW~::OiiL 'M""..,l"Jt'I."lHj,i::,,,.,,.,,,,,,,,,..ll "~,h';,,,,,,.-,,,,;:,,h,h tltk.,,,,,,,,,, '{.,J;C729:7,4~J:ri"I':6)'67Ti~16 ;J t;lli"... . ........k.""....~_..:!l\.""_..,_"...._._..,,.,,:J $3,900,931 $8,120,065 I"""" .,. ~""""r'"'''''''''' ....,,,'"',"',"',....,,,,,,,,, '"'''''1ml''''''l'*~~''''''''' '~:1m:r"-" """r"~"~'~"'r'''''' "," -'''"'-'....''~,,,..., ~::I!!:t......,.":.....":'."."..'I....'..'...'''1.,;1!:.i::.~'.:''i""'-'7"'"'' ""::"""""""'~lr:l1"I"'11"'~)"::"''''''''''1p''~''' ""'t!I 'INET,;F.UND ACiT;IVITY \;111"""1' :':..':,,'::,11':..;': ."::1I.1::I!'1 $1,789;783, ..::($2;244,999); ,,$1,290,630,1 ':',Ii $1,630,405 ! ",,,,;,',,'~'l',l>iilll,j1l:'~"v ....^....,;,:i'~,lill;i",,,'i1:;':J,,d, ~j..',~,j~L,.,.".-,' ,,,,,';m:Jilil';l,,,-,,,,,.,,i~,...J)J,...- jl,,;1,'.- ",;'.,.'_<l.M~"'I...",,,,. ~,~lr_~"~lJ,,.., ",,,,':u.~IIUf,,,,,.,,,,!.._,,,.;, ,.,. ~,,,,,...ll!';',.,;"'" ,.,,'~, ,"'("-lib!:..II,;.-......- ..-..~",=Il:<l,"..'!";'^__..__.^ ..97.. , - - --"" - I ..-RE[)EV,ElOPMENTAGE~~YJ~~~!> )' :~_ : _ ' . ;'6Qe;j STAFFING SUMMARY - 651 Assistant Director of Redevelopment and Housing Chief Executive Officer (CVRC) Community Development Specialist I Community Development Specialist II Director of Redevelopment and Housing 1.00 (1 00) (formerly Director of Community Development) Housing Manager Principal Community Development Specialist Principal Project Coordinator 1 00 (1.00) !:;;','[',");-;.:\.:' Project Coordinator 1111 2.00 (2,00) t:,ii"(i',!"i[;'.";'j Redevelopment Projects Manager ';\i!i:;!!!I:!~'l;.12!:i Senior Administrative Secretary 1.00 i,.'jjIU2::wl'.OQ.!J,'l Senior Community Development Specialist :':;,i:~;!:I;;~.':-' . Senior Management Analyst "".l:~.i~:!Imr!,1!:~j~"n.;,nJ:] Senior Project Coordinator 3.00 (1.00) 1"),.';i;!:):!i?:OOi!~JI ~;;~~i kll i1f~Li]lflIJ~~HfQ. .98. 'I' "i" ,- ,q I"~ " ':~1j. . l ' ..1:... _,~ J,r~p "......~ """, ,......m;;';.,: "i~"l'~r n~- ,_,' ,1, '1_' !; ~'''''.J , ""'-"_j..;"Fi '''I J q f-'-t-''''r'' !-, ' 1~ ,_ J',:>-<"", J., . J, "I' r,( f'."l ;11,1'( 'y, ,:! I,;"jlf ~~'",,".;,. .j~, "f "1,,,,/. , j;;. t."". L.. :.j PROPOSED , SEWER FUNDS BUDGET -99- The sewer revenues enterprise funds account for and expenditures related to the City's sewer programs, including maintenance and expansion of the City's conveyance system and payment of San Diego Metro wastewater treatment costs. SEWER FUNDS 'SEWER,FUNDSAT A'GLANCE\ .. . ,I', .:' '::.: ".. . ""'.: ,~. . ' ; .. ,', 'j,. .r.".. .'," ": " Number of Billing'Accounts:,' ,::' . '" ,,47,545',' ,. '.. !.I:" .; :"-""",.: .,_ !':.': "''''~'''';':' ,-':''':':V,:,_,''!', .. ",':,'< .j ", :.;W' Miles. of Pipe fv1anaged ".476 i' ,.' '!, ': ~!: ':'.. ..' '.. .' :..::;. ........,;: ~ " ". .." ' ','; h.. ' ". ;.................... ,,,, i 1\ '; .. Daily Trea\merlt Ri~hts (fI>1GDS*) 21 "":"..:';"",'- ,.. :1. ,.,1.: ,_, .. ,',,",.,',,', Average DailY.Treatinent (MGDs*) 'Aqnual TieatmentCost' ,', "."'.. ..,.. , , ,*Million gallons p~r day \::1-':""1" '/.,1 The City of Chula Vista provides wastewater conveyance and treatment services to approximately 47,545 billing accounts, including residential and non-residential uses. The wastewater generated by Chula Vista customers is collected and sent to treatment facilities in the South Bay and Point Loma through the City's extensive sewer collection system, which consists of 11 pump stations and over 476 miles of sewer pipe. The San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater System provides wastewater treatment services to the City of Chula Vista on a contract basis ($18.2 million in fiscal year 2009- 10). The City is currently analyzing options to secure sufficient treatment capacity to see the City through build out. This treatment capacity may be provided by either purchasing additional treatment capacity in the San Diego Metro Wastewater System or construction of a wastewater -101- reclamation plant in Chula Vista. The following figure illustrates the City's current trunk sewer network, which conveys flows to the San Diego Metro trunk sewer (shown in red). .~ - .&::'- . ~ --, { --,...' i c::::=:::I \ --\ ! ,_.~.".l, r' "" .' , ,." ,,:,.!'~' ,;1;;;"'\ \ 1 I I I \ ,\ .! . ~' \ .-."'" ,- , I~, . ., :'.;. rr lb .~ '--"'-~ ~=\ I ' '..1 j..,J', p"- !:~\' i" ~i,' ',,', _ - " " , f" .:, :i L,;;,,,,\ ..,.,. I - ..,.,.." - --- .....,.." 'liD Main StreeUSalt Creek Sewers Salt Creek Trunk Sewer Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer Poggi Canyon Trunk Sewer San Diego MWWD Spring Valley Trunk Sewer San Diego Otay MWWD City of Chula Vista Boundary The City of Chula Vista offers exceptional wastewater services to the community, For example, in fiscal year 2006-07, the City experienced only 2 sewer spills, or 1.3 spill per 100 miles of pipe. This is less than 50% of the regional average of 29 spills per 100 miles of pipe, as reported in the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board Executive Officer's Report, dated May 2008. The quality of services provided is also reflected in community opinion, as evidenced in the 2006 Citizen Survey. In this study, respondents were asked how they felt about the services they receive from the City of Chula Vista. Responses were then compared to other jurisdictions with populations of 150,000 residents or more. According to the survey results, an above average number of respondents reported satisfaction with the wastewater services provided by the City. Continuing to provide this exceptional level of service in the future will create significant challenges, including: 1. Securing sufficient treatment capacity in the Metro System or building a wastewater treatment plant to meet the demands of additional growth; and 2, Maintaining a growing and aging infrastructure system. In fiscal year 2007-08 the City transitioned its sewer funds from 'special revenue' funds to 'enterprise' funds. Enterpris.e funds may be used to report any activity for which a fee is charged to external users for goods or services, and are appropriate in situations wherein there is either a legal requirement or policy decision to recover costs of providing services for an activity. This change complies with the GFOA recommended accounting structure, should the City decide to issue bonds for capital improvements solely guaranteed by sewer fees and charges in the future. -102- Fiscal year 2007-08 was also the first year in which non-General funded positions (wastewater maintenance crews and wastewater engineering) were budgeted directly in the Sewer Service Revenue fund. Previously, these positions were budgeted in the General Fund, which was then reimbursed through a series of inter-fund transfers. Only those positions 100% funded by sewer funds were transferred out of the General Fund and budgeted directly in the Sewer Service Revenue fund ($3.9 million in fiscal year 2009-10). In addition to personnel costs, all supplies and services, capital, and utilities budgets associated with these positions were also transferred from the General Fund to the Sewer Service Revenue fund ($0.6 million in fiscal year 2009-10). The remaining wastewater-related General Fund positions continue to be offset via inter-fund transfers ($3.3 million budgeted in fiscal year 2009-10). As a result of these accounting! budgeting changes, the fiscal year 2009-10 budget for the sewer enterprise funds is not directly comparable to budgets prior to fiscal year 2007-08. FUND DESCRIPTIONS Fund 411 - Sewer Income Fund This fund is used to account for all revenues collected to recover the City's costs incurred constructing the public wastewater system. The funds are collected from new properties receiving a permit to connect to the City's wastewater collection system The owner or person making the application for connection pays fees to the City as designated in the master fee schedule. All funds received may be used only for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of sanitation or sewerage facilities, or to reimburse a subdivider or any person who has constructed sewer facilities benefiting other properties. The fund may also be used to reimburse the City for any expense incurred in connection with the construction and installation of any sewer facility including engineering work and acquisition of rights-of-way. Fund 412 - Special Sewer Fund The Special Sewer Fund is used to account for the sale of the City's excess Metropolitan Sewerage capacity. Fund 413 - Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund The Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund is used to account for sewerage facility participation fees received from the owner or person applying for a permit to develop or modify the use of any residential, commercial, industrial or other property, which is projected to increase the volume of -103- flow in the City's sewer system, as determined by the City Engineer. All revenue derived from the sewerage facility participation fee shall be used solely for: 1. Paying the cost and expense to repair, replace or enlarge trunk sewer facilities of the City so as to enhance efficiency of utilization and/or adequacy of capacity to serve the needs of the City, or; 2. Paying the cost and expense to plan and/or evaluate any future proposals for area-wide sewage treatment and/or water reclamation systems or facilities. The City Council can appropriate the funds for another purpose, provided such purpose shall be for the planning, design, construction, maintenance or operations of sewage collection or treatment or water reclamation purposes. Fund 414 - Sewer Service Revenue Fund The Sewer Service Revenue Fund is used to account for all monies collected from the monthly sewer service charge. Monies in this fund may be used for any and all sewer related activities. The primary use of these funds is the payment of the City's annual San Diego Metropolitan Sewer Capacity and Maintenance fees and to pay the operational costs of the 'in-city' sewer collection system. Fund 428 - Sewer Facilitv Replacement Fund A portion of the revenues derived from the monthly sewer service charge is deposited into the Sewerage Facilities Replacement Fund Monies in this fund are used solely for the purpose of paying the cost of refurbishment and/or replacement of structurally deficient sewerage facilities including related evaluation, engineering, and utility modification costs. The City Council can appropriate the funds for another purpose provided such purpose is for the construction, maintenance, or operation of sewers or incidental thereto, including any charge for its collection. Funds 431.432, 433 - Sewer Development Impact Fee Funds These fees are levied against new development in specific areas of the City, based upon, the sewer facility their project will impact. The monies collected are used to fund construction of public improvements designed to increase the capacity of the subject facilities, allowing the City to -104- maintain service levels with increased demand. Included DIF programs are the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin DIF, the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin DIF, and the Salt CreeK Sewer Basin DIF. -105- At"" i~ "nt'" \' i'r)I"" ~ ff. A " ,r ,\,-~ >" " """ ,.., r~ti!=~,,".lJj \,. '~L"" \" '1; iiJIL. '! !,!'l ;~i Jf..< '~' j ~ L ~ . ~ . . . -106- 1m , EaF U NID" ' , , ; .' '.' .' , ':',' 4~ '0 ! ~ __""_ _ ....f.,"'.l _.... _ _, _... _ __~ __ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Utilities Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Charges for Services Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o 16,082,823 o 14,992 171 9,358,703 1,375,092 $26,831,781 1,339,325 28,128,566 373,410 755,579 $30,596,880 3,512,916 18,440,142 4,967,986 652,140 6,640 4,755,301 2.743,187 $35,078,312 6,090,269 29,155,385 337,176 174,258 $35,757,088 I;: i":) ;932('384 :;J~:rl;'3~980 ~787;:~ L._"".,.;,.._.......,_..~......., '. ""', '........"''--~ 1:'--19:609, 5 f3-,~;:iir'1 9;:151,821' L;~.^~,<~~......". ;; .,~, "......:,'~,..,';.u ..l;.~;,.;;. N,~,.....,l<"k.,._,,,;,,,,;,..;,. " !('.l'"'""'~'- "r" 1""'"~"''''-''-'''''' ff'fffin"~'''''rn'''''''' ,,,,,,~. '''-''':1 tU~t[~~~{~;2,9X"d!::1r~jl~'jJ..Ri,~~1::iJl r'-' o;:"1i'!790';Z::12ll'~I:i;]1'575'951f ffi.J:::'_lilll.:;;..Jt"., ,,_< '...,J;., _~.:J ~li.dJ:L:;~;d,,",,~,;,;,; :,',....~;,.;i!j tl~~~~.riG\i'o:6~57"l MI' ',~7~:q:6~961~ ;.:;", .,h....~'.l',. . ,"""........._" ........ m...,,,;;_,Am;;-.....,___,~........~,,,:~1 1.":r:;1'620'665 '11111": jlli37 9"95" lJ:;,,0,JtLJ>..' >>,,,"..,,,.!_,,,Dill~;;;h:;LL,~!;...,,,,,,,,, ,........H;;;i(' E'Cnn 0}:~~,9. .:G1:::'1:i];C[~TQ9..9.::J $31,110,516 $28,892,353 i:1r:::'i-09.:F525Vr.r1i;j"10941S251l fj.,Jb!:....!.H.."',l;;".'....."'........:iwlaJtc;,~.,;.".~..........:.....!.~_...,,'"~J: r, . 'j-3','o9Ei;:2E;'Q'Qlm:'-29Tl'83:'228, L""...;".R'.... ., ..^,'U,", j..,,~..~.dl..~I,..^,...M,,~.~,t:,. ", ."~,_,,~;.,,, -]r,;N--........----'1l~4--.----_...~-,.._~ <8,:,',. ll~ 462.j232:li lj }jl,? .Hf 351 ':266:1. 1.1~.",,,,,,,,",,,,.h,,....,._,",_.,,,,..,,.;.Ill ,w",,,,,',,b,,,,,,,,,J.., ,-,~",n. I, ,':~i~r619'1768.r<~lm:: ,'ii,1'7 4'258 . E2";~.":b,,,~,_..!..~.,,,_,,d...!IL.;;:;;;mn.:.:......,....~;_.......i,;;, $35,274,785 $31,403,277 ",""'.tw""'lt~, '..' 1~'''-''''''''J''''';''J!''''l''''''',''"';~,,,,w''rl'''_'_:'~W'l'1)')''''.'l'I"II""C";-""';'jl:'!w'o",p~rl~lrll';' . ,~"~""'.,,"r.';"',""'''''U'''\w;:'''''''','''Jl~''''''' :'..'m...."'w,"',." "l''';!lt~r~'''n,~'-''''''''r;'''''':''l''''(f''I''''''-''''~I''''I'w,,'''-'~I""""''''l''Ml'''~'''''.'t NE;TFU ND'ACTlVITY 1!11;,~, ;I~;:;jiin "I,ll:';{; ;Ii ':i;::i;;[: ' $,3;76!i,099i ':-:!~il ;:'1 $678,77~ ". L: :"~,4!164,269:'li~ ",$2;51 0,924::, ,dL,.....;:J,,,..,,.l1-:~l;.;J""~""'.a."",,L;IJi';),WJ).,J""'''''',~H,.ilillltnll>l~h.~l.d1i2.J,,-.!il",-,' jk.J,,>,<;,;;'_='h.,.~;Ii..,J..,!., ' ' ;,;,<<.il;.;w,"'"'.Ll!l.A"U~"~'''''''I>iM,;>i....UIIl'b"di.lliJ:~"l.J.~~''lli''''''..iI'''''~,!f~ EXPENDITURES 291 Sewer Income 292 Special Sewer 293 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 294 Sewer Service Revenue 411 Sewer Income 412 Special Sewer 413 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 414 Sewer Service Revenue 428 Sewer Facility Replacement 733 Sewer Facility Replacement TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 291 Sewer Income 292 Special Sewer 293 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 294 Sewer Service Revenue FUND DETAIL o 4,632 651,367 25,504,489 o o o o o 671,293 $26,831,781 90,739 23,022 5,269,833 23,578,026 -107, o o o o o 100,000 6,476,438 27,354,914 1,146,960 o $35,078;312 ""';""'~""1'/If"'","'~'m-J'!""""~"~7"''''~''"''!'1~'mb""Wrnfl"~' t:i:",!!LW~:I.;:2i:iJ!iliiilili~q1J~jHU!tJmilJ:uUiim!mi~h..QJJji 1....",""c.;;m'''''1T'''''O-,I"Cj~1 . "7lf'l-'0'- ~.'" ;. _",'~ ,,:ma ~;;~ 'r,~:'" :', "1'"'' [.,'l.' "', ,t,"ha,l ,,',,' 1..<', '---:'}'.~' " .',""', .".". '. . ~ '.' .,' ..,.". '., 1')'.""." ,. .>'. "."~.L ",,~.i:L, .)",ill..l~..;.;", .."., ~! ~ll.l' J.." ,l:.;! ~lt..l.", ~ "M; ,~,;;'."""j), lli~'iu!~~j~Jr]~illf1[QJ!1~[;;2;~~i~;ijilllllilt;gj;J iiI" '.. "," '1I1I'T6[''7;lU, I r " 'l"Ji:" , o'q ;, """i!;,h,;;:J)!~::;)I..~~",,, "Jj~,L 1"",,:~II~Ll,,;Li:,uL.,"~ I , :''1''''.... .. '1:111'\.0 :l"i" ' "'I'""; ,..tfllFO"" jj"']~ l',,'!~llillillj".'i": .'."j ~'j:t'da1L:~'iL~ r>N"lt"r:""-~--"~"'Jrt:<""~"""""""'f...r;:::i)J . ''-''1' ""h5'0"" 304 'I "'"j" '1''''''''''', '0' . :"'..1.".. .. ,.IIl...;'.'.,..'.'...."..,..:-:.'''',..,.. "k:ij;~UtiJl.(, "",~"",,;;;;L ".;j,,,,,nJll,l;1h''',,,,.:l1lljk,,,;,; Ii: Y"'~i(22':oi'i4)"JSif,:iml:91i: 000", .. ,. . ...... _.~, ,. .~---;;;;;, r"2i'F858~619':ll!f:';;'2-'7,,:;rofi095'~ ,;'-.; ::;;':::,,,,,,,~,',; ,....,;,.,"~~,~.,'".,..,;,rl !l!ir:i:,.",.,,,l;~J,,:,... :....' ,.",,,,,..... .(, r,=,';'''2':32;:f2851~,[~ ;:'~874:25"8i ~ .c.........--;,..,.............~-" . ........~ p:m~~i~f~i;if(::;!,1mJ~,~;J1i701ill~%p1~:ry!?r:rr'ill:.1f:J'c)j , ,'" ,. ,'~l~ H",,,^',,mUW"n'~" llliL."..,;Jilji:;.,"..""IlJa."" .... $31,110,516 $28',892,353 o o o o :'SEWER FUNr:;~ . : -;" ';", - - - . - .:~- '41:0;': I _ -'"_ "=_ _~_ - ~ ~ .. __ _ <to _ _ _ _ ~ I 411 Sewer Income 412 Special Sewer 413 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 414 Sewer Service Revenue 428 Sewer Facility Replacement 733 Sewer Facility Replacement TOTAL REVENUES o o o o o 1,635,260 $30,596,880 92)03 22,518 7,206,885 26,518,263 1,917,219 o $35,757,088 IT,'I;:;T'Wl:i1J@:J)i:"r6':':';~i;~n\;!!,i/"''1n!mt.:IL~1,!~,'O~ij~ ...."---....,- -"""''-._._ _._u.......;J,.<-...;_,".JI!JL ,JL,.~....,..J ['0~iv ,:~,.';~'~":r,:"cfq _1:::;1 '[ T{n;r:r;:;;67~ "......"'...:""i:tJ..f",,,,,.,......,,,,....L..IL..J,,I,..., ,...Ili.h.,;;,.,.,,,,.'jl:f nw;,,,".'S'3'5'9'n462'L~q:,1rrjii, '.~r'6'6fF864'n~ ~;~ ......2......_..~,'l...........~,~ILJ.:;~jJ,...,!.,_._i_!....~_,_:.!j r:L7~~:~ii.rb.}}:1[~:2!;IQ"1!, 09tL! I:i ,"1':5"28','308" ::;':';iV;:1:693:,'318'~~1 [......,_,...... ,.,.~..~.~ ....."'-.. .tJlllL:,m:;..]::..... _...... ._,,--_" i"'Tj " ' " " " 'O-1ir"-'-"~-~I"":--OGl' I,.'j, ..,' "~""" 'i. .!,,1. 'J''':'J'~.';',~~,.,..>.... ,,, "",-"." .'''.'''..'''., ,..._, -., ""'-' ",'.,.. . .........,'__....,j,_.ILJ..'.T~..L_"....,.,II...L,..,;,..,.,'\r,,l:jk.../i,'"",,,, $35,274,785 $31,403,277 ."'lft....,'......~r"'V'"'"..-,,--~i!"!':'j<,w.,. .0~j!' . .J~~::'I"':r~~P..,~1J~:r,........,....,.,...-'.".."""I1'""---" ,....~.:.~-.-;;:;;:a~....",..,...,'~..I. ., '''.~._.;rt::r."...~'''7..,,,....~,.,....~, !NE~, FUNl:!,ACTIVIJ,V:"ii:'II!,.i" "H',! i:::" "t"I(I'" :1.1'[':.'. $3;!,65,09~' ":'I! ':/ $678;776, ,:,i',i"$1l;164;269:":,1 "',$2,~1 0,924':,1 II.- "". '.., .H,II'ltJlh.":.,.:,."~j;llil"'n........",.,.,tLi",,,,,,, '"'' ~"~''''''''''' .,,,H!.Jll,,,,,;.,,,<c,ll>d:'.,, .,."'.' ...."..,lwL"".,....,,,li<,~,;"';;.....~.,;,III~I,H,'" " .. ,,) .hi,',".__.' "";~,'""'",....,!i,,UI,4,,,,;,..."'M I ~"j,,;""";,,~Iij,;r, ',.., : "",41:,.. "".' ....,.111l11'~.... .. :"',A;;,! -108. f: .s~~,ME!{ IF;U~,~: . - - '. . , . . ,,' : J. .: '.' _ 'ii' '" - Alio.,j STAFFING SUMMARY - 414 e,!... ',~':,~;~~:~~';,Q:q:._~'] ~.. '1::r1 i""" "" "n 1""" '. """'",'" 'I' " '" . ." . ,2:00,'" t ... ____'"'" ,. ,... F:fIT;'l'):'~'~i~;:~""QQ,;;,',,n :~~,':' ';, :::3:':l~~:'Q.9':i, ',ill !j;'!!. l!;:~i;i.~.;'!:~'i:lt;},:! 9' Q'!:~ '! ',"i P''", ':'~.'7i~,Tr:-4~0' .--ro' T~ , ".lei' .!.,;" ."C.,,: i!:~:J!":~'!:!.j.;;1::'!3':.Q6":"lj <jJ;.:U!J;;;'U:E~fpQ,i',i:\:i '~:;-'''-'''''i'''' "-'. ., 'I Senior Maintenance Worker 14.00 f". ."",1400,'" ,~ l-_l~t~~)~ Associate Engineer Engineering Technician 1/11 Equipment Operator Maintenance Worker /111 Public Works Specialist Public Works Supervisor Senior Civil Engineer Senior Fiscal Office Specialist 2.00 2.00 3.00 18.00 100 4.00 1.00 100 -109. !_SEW,ER,~[)I;f ,f;ti~O ." ..::' ~ -. " "'"i' ,,:'.' _ 4'30; i r. "-: _' _ .. _, _ _ ~ 'i:I _ EXPENDITURES Other Expenses Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES FUND SUMMARY 117,880 755,579 106,156 $979,615 414,878 556,160 $971,038 144,697 1,000,083 121,731 $1,266,511 465,134 539,136 $1,004,270 171~;rrf22)91;7n:"'~:;:19;091':1, IfJk.;"..~~"_....,,,..,,,"....,.J,,,,,,,,,":";dJlH..l,^,,,,,jJl.'.,,_;;';" ,....,.0',....",. [,;l;~, -;;;'iio;i:Ei6"'il ~rr::~~!:256:o60;IJ :.,. _~"..J""...,.._."~,_.^,,,.^..~.,:.;t~l. ,,~.lL, ~......,I_"", .."..;.....;.""........ ~'''-.,_.'''..W''.".;..-'''IHt~ ..... .. ""'~'I'" "'(:"j"!'W""IH!W""- ';....'ffll'r'.. "':;1 (~~;J~JlliJQ0~~..,;g']lli}1~t1t,,:jF:!i::!~j1i $843,347 $369,091 fl~iF?r.::r";;:Fl~f";:'oTI'~ir;J!?jj~lz:t<ifnF~~O"';'~ 1" ....,., I ".." '" ... .." ." .,_ , .I_ ,I~ '" '. ." ,J "'." .,c. ,.. .. ., ~,"" .",i.ll.~. ....,,,JI<,,,, ,~i,I""".". ~,~.l..."".,...d ~~"."._,:iL"""", II". ,,"ilL: 22i5:290'll/E1'1.i!;:f20:o'66 III t.;,..........~....._.......w..:::J:_iJ1.i~.-'. $220,290 $120,000 r<f"'l-~""""'~"""""'--"-'-''''''if'lT,'~~~1'''0~''il~'lMr:'~~:''1!':1~~;;:'';''''~''''''''-rt\l"'~!""""-'I"''"7''''!m;-''i'l"r-r:l"r'i-'~'''''!1>~''''''''''~rr:)r:~-'rr''!''l!!"'''''r.<'''''1'1 iNETliFUND Ae<TIVITY""i'Ii:': ,:.,,',[-:, ,,:illl" .'I"!!, ,11'1".: ,i'lI!I, (~8,g7)1"I'($262,241)i:1 ' ',,1($6~3,957.) ":i'!i'0($~49,0,91) L,j~',~Iu;.llu">;,,~II~It,,. ....:i4li.I:~..,,,....lll,"',,.~jj,~J.,,).....,,.,ltEmM.'-:.u'~ .,."~....(~,,..lt~ I,.. ."",'.:.lI,~.,~":.u..~,......~....~,w,;[;,w,,~;.,.,.J,, ""~<~...l.-..,,,. ....4.,.1.:< ...,:....._~..,~....u..l.l,,,,.~"'I.J,~...._JJJu...,'-"_,Iil,,~,,,.....l<~._,j FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 431 Tel Cyn Sewer Basin Plan DIF 432 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DIF 433 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF 541 Tel Cyn Sewer Basin Plan DIF 543 Tel Cyn Sewer Pump Flows DIF 551 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DIF 553 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 431 Tel Cyn Sewer Basin Plan DIF 432 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DIF 433 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF 541 Tel Cyn Sewer Basin Plan DIF 543 Tel Cyn Sewer Pump Flows DIF 551 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DlF 553 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF TOTAL REVENUES o o o 13,291 45,17.1 751,742 169,411 $979,615 o o o 82,520 2,881 336,058 549,579 $971,038 60,073 39,828 1,166,610 o o o o $1,266,511 58,457 166,129 7.79,684 o o o o $1,004,270 ~qr;~~35:000:::!h;i'iil'il}!f~I'i~;35,:oomi~ 1(.",' ""~,~l.<,;,,,;~,,,,,,..... "." .".~,.'.'" Al,jL,;",,, ..!l"",~, ,,,",,,:,,,,,, !' ",.,.. '........i "'-""''','''""" ""Jr'"'' """"''''1 uaU.JtJ~~1'.:f,2.?.tY~'~;:'~.;~i:il.fullQ!Q.Q..Q.bf r"';T';~:T:1:,-"w2"~"~":'"'' '''~1'''':! ;-!":'tr:,T'l;~"" ,..'trh"""!1!, illh;;~Jj~jL..~~Q9 !1":jtj~dtiill.lld?~~;P~illlbt ~~~ " ~"~-'l'~~.ll"m""""", c-"~ W'~.::I'"......" "" ,"">1'-1'10.....1 '1'1' 'I'"" ',:IJ'j"""'I' "0 > 'iL!: "I:!::::;,' ',;,F"i:;!::J,!,' . t:::;k'" "!:--:':.,:! '1:1;. -;~' " "Jim""""",""". .,,,,,,,,,,,1.,,, ,,,~1. ""L" ", f"" -"...,' '::I"""" ---'f"'"'''' """""'0" "'''''1i''' '~I !~\i:~j;"', Ii # ;,*~"~ .jn;JIl 0 ~i, ;:i~:,:;;:JlJ!;1;;:J;I1ci'iiiJfl'j"';~;:O':1 ~1,.,w,,,,,,,,,_'<1il,.<IiW.,,1,~'l...........~ ,tl~""','d,fuiiOmi'f."""""u",,, r'~''-':'~~'"I'''''''1Irnrow'F'.'!'~''''';''' ":"I"~(h.-:::.:-!'mln:'';';::'11!llj~'nJ'' "'~:";'!'ilj!(;::h !llIP,j,'." 'I' 0 ".;,:,;; '11il "'~.:mlllH::Hiil"f:' 0:' k.;~;f~:ii..-Jt.Jilli~b...JJrl4illj, JwjwLdi:;!SD~,.; ~lfJq:;;Jr~y,II~JlMn,:1i76':71:'(!:~~I)Ii1-:.ii'~!111;1,,'!::('W,'ii:!.~,6'q ".......'"n.,I,.,"",.1.11 .",..n"~.~.,L,,"d,,U <1<,,,........,,. f;,,,,,,,,,',JII.,,,.,,,,,, $843,347 $369,091 $220,290 $120,000 ~NE':Y:F'iTN'D[Ac'rrVIT'y~j.;"'nj1nl~It;;~~~:Ji':;!~!;';i:'1PFiWi1i;~r;;ri;'!~($8T5nT:lJ:--i"~f$262~24'1T~'~,I~~f$6nT6'57')\::'rir"($249~'09'1'~ ....:!.;";"i;ikwl:;:::i,;l~l;"",;i:,~i./ll,,,...,;jl;.;l,,~,;.:.J"kJI~i"::.:I~i;"Jr;'h.;:;;.L.li;;;;:u..,j:::,:l;l1Jiml:"jit,,:4..L:7"."'M"'!..";~iL;~,,)LI~"I)..::", ,."....:;",."";,~i~;::::;,..,;~;,!::,;wL,,,.., .;: ;1;;;:';;;i,!"';',jw".""H::!:,i~;W:,, ,,,jl,,,;~"";;,,m,,lil:,:.,,J .110- r!";~,-V<':.,'" ,fr"'l',~: "~", ~ ..' ~ 11,,# ,J . ff''''ttl,_;:;I'f 1, ::i 6), ~ (':'tJ'f:nj.;I~'l:,~. ,. 'r, 'j,', :;if! PI!! d H ~, ,.,~, ,If I ' "'~,,,',<"" '.....,...,.. '<b!..-I' ...."Wi ," " H ,J ." .. ,., PROPOSED TRANS~T fUNDS BUDGET -111- TRANSIT FUND The Chula Vista Transit (CVT) is an independent municipal transit system with the Chula Vista City Council as its governing board. CVT forms part of the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), which is a network of local and regional transit operators. The MTS provides a seamless transit system composed of local, regional and ADA paratransit services. MTS coordinates fares, transfers, routes and information services to the region. Transit staff also works closely with the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) - the region's transit funding, planning and policy setting agency. REVENUES Chula Vista Transit operating funds come from a combination of State Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds (a Y. of 1 percent of the State Sales Taxes) and passenger fares, which are used for operations and for capital programming. Prior to July 2001, the City received a direct allocation of its TDA funds, but in 2001 regional transit funds were consolidated under the Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB), now the MTS. The funding consolidation allows the City to participate in available Federal Transit Administration (FTA) capital funds programs. The City has received significant capital project funding from MTS over the last few years, which has allowed Transit to purchase equipment, vehicles, and parts to -113- keep the transit system operational. These funds have also been used to make improvements to transit centers and bus stops in order to keep both our internal and external customers happy. Chula Vista Transit Revenues Revenue From Other Agencies 1 $ 315,330 $ 1,738,349 $ 1,423,019 451% Charges for Services $ 1,411,838 $ $ (1,411,838) -100% Other Revenue Total $ 1,727,168 $ 1,738,349 $ 11,181 1% Note 1. Beginning in FY 2009-10, funding received from TDA has been reclassified as Revenue From Other Agencies rather than Charges for Services Transit staff's goal is to maximize the effectiveness of transit funds while recognizing the revenue constraints facing the region. Since the funding consolidation, Transit staff actively participates in the SANDAG/MTS budget process. Along with the region's other Transit agencies, City Transit staff presents its proposed operating budgets. Various budget meetings are held and budgets are adjusted according to the available funds and SANDAG Board funding policies. EXPENSES CVT operations and capital programming contains no General Fund contribution. The CVT's operating and capital programming costs are funded by SANDAG Consolidated TDA Article 4.0 funds and Federal Transit Administration 5307 funds. All City Staff costs are reimbursed by the SANDAG funds. Other than personnel and staff time reimbursements, the majority of CVT's expenses are fleet maintenance costs, which includes fuel costs. Chula Vista Transit Expenditures Personnel Services $ 356,000 $ 356,365 $ 365 0% Supplies and Services $ 820,000 $ 802,895 $ (17,105) -2% Other Expenses $ 290,000 $ 282,738 $ (7,262) -3% Transfers Out $ 95,000 $ 92,321 $ (2,679) -3% Utilities $ 190,000 $ 204,030 $ 14,030 7% Total $ 1,751,000 $ 1,738,349 $ (12,651) -1% The fiscal year 2009-10 'budget includes funding' for 3.0 positions, which is the same as the previous year. Personnel services have been amended to reflect the elimination of the Cost of Living Adjustments. Overall, there is a net expenditure reduction of $12,651 to include reductions in Supplies and Services (reduced fieet maintenance charges related to fuel) and a $7,200 reduction in overhead charges partially offset by a $14,030 increase in Utilities based on rate increases. -114- STATISTICS Operated by City 01 Chula Vista by contract with private bus contractor Routes 6 Service Six local routes most within Chula Vista city limits, with some service in unincorporated areas 01 the County (Bonita). Square Miles Served 48 FY 2007-08 T olal 3,406,773 Passengers (37) buses (25) 40-loot, CNG New Flyers Fleet Size (1) 35-loot, Diesel Orion (3) 35-loot, Diesel Gillig (6) 30-loot CNG EI Dorado Nationals (2) 40-1001 Diesel New Flyers -115- I> t \) <~!J ,r.....~, k. uW! hi"". j' J' '''' "-1 h a .----..""... '\ /-----~~ \~ ,"'" . hJ -.... ',I., \f:.!J "." ~ 1 /'\.. . n.n \;,.11" t, ij ~V~'~;L.~"\ '> Ih~p \. ,,' It "~:, ll' ,:', .' v \ f 11" I ~ "\. \ 11~1 ~,.........,.;,. 1....-.... .........A ' i1 ' \ '\. 1.1~i ,!,.J' , i \, ./"' .\ } f 'i'._..)(...J 1'\ ~- \. 1"" , . ;1\, "r. >'. iIl',} '\!ilt \ ../ \ II"., ~1 \., .'1,' ,.'.., , "\...-JJ \....' ........~. .., _ ,~,~"",,-,-,,-'-'~S i1 't f ;' '\.1,,\ "J' 1 ' I~"/ pJ. ',. (~, \ I ,\ '~. 1'.' \ r ,. / :,\,. \ i$ . ,,' It, ; 't;!-~ _~J' ~~ ~'! i t'""'''';'' ,i?;~~r ~hl \:'""</';/;.Jy\ . il~~. \, ,~!, Ii rS\\ \s!t~\"')' t "I. "",," '.-'1 ., , . U . l \.. .J~"lm . J ~\ " \ll , t J' '\ /"" \)(jll ff~~ .' ,",(, \Y'~ \ ;ii , I.,'", j/' ,I .\." "7""\' \\ \ JI': I y" I ,-"'" '. "":<'-".', "', ,-,,, \".", f ~ \ _" J,,~- '\ ~ ~ \. .,,-;.~. i\'" \ ". j..,....\. \ i...--' "-'"'''''' :, 'H' ,..- .,....~"~ \ '. ..," -~" u~,..Ur/" ~ ,.;PI'''--~ \ ...,.r- "~I "h" '" ,..-- i ,,' ( ,., '\_-:' \ nI "El.~..\"""\ I] \ '! ;1 ,I \ ! J L3'.\" 1.'IIA/". "._'1' \' i \. \""jl~. ..\..t"V~'l\'.,' l~ '\ ~r', ...,.,.... .,11 ,~'; t1-....---..{ " , J' !!; ~\\<~'.,. ~ ,......,.. .Wi . \\n~ "\ \ ,.,..'':-tr \ ~'1\ ~..:-,- I o.,'\ \/. \ .)\ ..:. ~lhEl l \-"'1 'Jb \-,\ ,,il " ! , """'" ... r " ~~ \ ur:>-' ","'.WiI, >, \.-.:."..- !.i.1 ~ . \ ~-:;;;.-"'-'i ,,,":;i(,r~,,\ H 't,>,;l'( "... . .....~~.~:~~~:j-_4:~__.J 'I .}; .,.......- I \ .,"5_~" .. IJ_' --- ~;'" _~...." li ...-~-:." _---~...... ;~,.......-_~.,.J! /:.... ,;;::;;;;:-..' \ ,'y/~'" : I'.r t,-~, \ !."""o"' J~~ t . [ I Il ,);" ", f"" lo,; " I n;....~ -;~-h13 ,"'. ~t~Jt I 1:".\ <,/ f' \ ~{ j,1-'''t It!! . 1-" f " t ,. '., '~..':'\' ~I ~. ~"" ~,l~,\ 1"il:{iIH'.lJ!;'f,.::t~C"W""'i'I" H ~I'. ,,\ Ilhlll1d,,', ,Il' , 611 .. l - ~ .. , ' j Jl 'Ivl ii! \",1" ",,1~ I, J!,'\ J "~q...,. (:,'iiJ1 "'Y J lh,\ !!, 'I, E t;El H B~ 5 """ ~" " ~~ ~e ~t: (~ ~ ~~j 0'- ~ .... ell ... i;3 'il" "'!!.: ~\J ~o I.;.~ G.. " (, ~F, ". _I:..: ~o-::! ..;.;!;.r .:. ~.:. ~~ a ~l~ "go "ga ;,~" "., J"~~' :"0::; ~l:& ~"''' l..lt;~'" ",e:.. 2a'~ i5~ 2S~ ~~~B ~~n I I ~ U ~ M H <: ~ M M ~ ~ i f ~ i~ f I t ',j lIt:, ! j , ,\ ~ 1; II 0 C o B ~.' a" II :'.:! t ... ~ z :r.a~..=-~!;~=~::::" l..U ~~:.1::~j~aa~;;,,':5:; ~ ~?,.L! ~L~~ ~ldL~~ ~ ~ ( ),~ f' ,,.....-' '. G m l!) .. " E3 ~ .. "0 tI 'J ~. ~\ ;~~ ~ .;j T( "d o ~ltfJ \A , .,.~,............... , , \ '\ " \ , \ , 1\ \\ l~..<.. 'j ) / I 1i< uJJ , l!I ~J ,,,.....,., ..," .'$( t '" ''''''I'--.'N;~;'' I ; >"","'~ 1"..-"""'" " ''--'to:', 1.1 ~~" -. ,. .116- ", , ;; l'R~NSI:T 'F~~,l? 1, " " "", . c, ", '~, '~400' FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Utilities Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Revenue from Other Agencies Charges for Services Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o 5,549,320 1,544,852 o 192,939 22,618 147,140 $7,456,869 167,735 3,677,603 2,433,007 131,967 $6,410,312 359,907 6,697,707 1,081,589 2,999 174,373 13,410 82,913 $8,412,898 184,751 5,378,518 1,660,821 316,059 $7,540,149 r"''l''p; 3 56' Oo'O:'I~":1,7:;!'i3561'36'5"! i;~b.I!"L;)J;,....."""" ",.".."",, :ld~;;:;;;.ilJ:::';,;.!,;"".",;. '.."... ,'~:n 'i,,'if':', ;'826'0061'1 ':i,/',";'S02:1EJ5 T L"L.:."......,....,~ ......J.,'-"-=, ,__....J w'; .."t.':'.,T........," "',' 'W_,' "prp""'.!iil!"l.,,""'H'" V"'~'''''''';'i1 0~1BtW:;,,?~~,Q,;.QQQ,~HL:jib1Ui]f2:.?1;;j~,3~J!~ f0!~(;;;i':,,'n,W]illr~,i;;rojlJ~i~;:;'~~!ffiW]:;H~ifo:';~ ,...,j,:J,L, ...".t;iL",.,.llll\;, ..,n.,W .... ._..~,(.",.",,.I;~,w...~jrlld.,,l, """-"---,"'-g-"'" .._'--'--~ 90,g,Qq}:iI,~:':I~I,r::i:g9.4:g,,3.0 '!I T'~""T""rljW'.:':rfl!r"';';j;IW"W';""""",::, .:oqQ.j;!ibL:;~dU~1tl:.~~1:~;~j "..,..,.", '''"'''''-''''I''''--''l~ "",'," '''~'''' "'IF," .., ,. ".",1,,"."" ''''''''''111:'''0''.'' ...;;.......,',.,.;;,.:..," ''''>!,," 'OJ' ",j".."'i'lll.,....',',,,i.. 'U .',.."'1'...'.',...,,'.',....'('... ." I-..:S~~'~ll.:i~.-i... ..iWb..;":":~':"Il' '),JlLiL::;" $1,751,000 $1,738,349 P','.l''l''''''"",,,'tl 10iJ"~ ,'" '1"~;:'11~0'';;1 ..i;.., "H.':" I"'; '.,~',,", I! I;,..)!. '.' ~i ,{. . ) ii,:<i~1!I'!;,1 I'!l .....Jb"~.",t,'I"'!;';,;;;;.,,,.,,,,.,',.,...,ho.,,~,(ii,,..:;:;""",.,.,.".,JL",,,,,\ J;,Jl1;rE;W3'15':330 ';,~I':i;::n(~ '; 7:i'S::i49WI ,"','l1lo..~..,.!h:::fu<j." _,~,~,...,JJlf.. '~lt;;""'->..,...,...,.., ".....,..,..... ""1t!"."'C""'""""""';"""~'"'''' """';;""""'I"';'.'("m"~'l.l'!H"".'J" ' ~ ,,"',j. 411,838' ',,'," .II",'mll'II'" ,'t "'0 ~1.1~LIl~!...d.~!-.;. ' ,'I 6;;j~~~a.UJ!ili1JI~ r'r:H;"I':77,,:,W';t"":;::'1~:r;~'0'-TY'. . !lN~"'lfTlm;c;W:'I"O~0m ;;rl,lil";";""'rlfo";"'-'i'IWi'; ,1'I':<';;l]II:,...,,)-'.-I,II'-'.,>.J;;'IlI111;:r L';;:::':'.:..jiliS;u'l;;i:;!;il...lm;""" ;;j);;.'~";.,;,:,U;;,;Ji.oid.ii;;i.(iLlli.:.,,..;;J $1,727,168 $1,738,349 fN'E1i~wmNBrAcfi\liT~fim~~irll~]I,~r~i:ft~I!~r:Nr~imrJ;:~!il;;'~($1'1>>46' 557));r.I:Jli':i:'-!($8721;74'9j:l'nl~li:II';;;i($'2S832)1;~:inll\i:!:>'!W"Hi:1W.;n'$o:!!1 !(,.;i)~~"!ii';iiJ!ln:;:"";";(l~L,,h;lliJ.Ii,;;';:;';;mlJiij;;,;;!l;;;!;;;"'::ii1d;;;::ifrlllili;!i:ii~~-,!i;:;";:JdJ.iiit;;;d!.I!:-",~.h~.~,".;c..Ju}.;:,...:"'ilLii:i1;,.iillL;'"Wi;;;;';;"iutl(J...;.."u;,jiL'S:j;~~JU;i:;i;,"""i,';j""'~'UH1L,-\i,,JJ!iiI,::it;;ffil;,..:;dAIU;'LiWl.",;;;,ii FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 401 Bayfront Trolley Station TDA 402 Transit CVT 403 Transit Capital Projects TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 401 Bayfront Trolley Station TDA 402 Transit CVT 403 Transit Capital Projects TOTAL REVENUES 103,691 7,169,095 184,083 $7,456,869 103,692 6,287,608 19,012 $6,410,312 98,406 8,218,169 96,323 $8,412,898 98,405 7,428,089 13,655 $7,540,149 """11'1""..."'...."'........"~"'''.w'''njl.'....'''lr'';.',...,"'wo",....,.""."......J 1diL!:.\.ci:l,Q8,QOO 'u:,;;,Pslid:!.91,!!12.." r:m''''''.,'._'~.'''.'''''t-~,.~'-::''~I'.,.'.,.';n:-'''.'.''....---:.,~.,_. "'''1 ~i:J!~2~~12illQQJ~jJjjill1~r;.8~,,~:;.~;Jr 1"",,,.,.,.,,...""-_. .~""~'=".,...,"-'~~ \;f!!': "";;..':~:';;'hlln;~1l":i.",. 0 ':~l ~l'!:'~~i! "IWr~'-;i ':1:::1;:':1;; "'; 0::,' '."i'jltJ"."....,,~"',... ...I~!i~; --... ",. r;;",-,>..,JL " q,dlo.<<. .,... ~ll.,-;;...", $1,751,000 $1,738,349 ':1e!:" "'1'0."2'''6':7:9']1'' "~'"'.''''<''0''26''7'9;1'1 lii'ai,,:i' ,', .' ;1 GWj!"I'!~ai:/jf' . .'; . .' ~~~~~].24lt4891f1l!!iirr,rri~l~1~6~~~E70:i!;.!, ".:J1JjL"....,..._,......., ,,,.,__,,...i.Jlt8,""~.,,......,,',...,... .<_..........., "'J!'~11,;I'lf!.ll"ll'l:'~Hii~:'!,\~0-~f. ~M;'I'i':'fJ:I~t!""","\1r,,"1!I'!~:"0..f1;\; "","<-"''''''[''''''';''.;'' ',. ./.,........1....,..'". C""',-".' ." ."":,...,"'"""liljh.-.,,,.,.,~Ll..,<<.lt ........"IL"....,,,,t! ~""...'" 1",,,,(,, $1,727,168 $1,738,349 rNE'T:'FQ'N'D,;"Ac'1i!'vTT.x;;;~jF;~,:',;,:JIt'j~~F~:ilgWF,:n:::,1'~'ii.,#,l;'j1i~;?jlii^($'r;O~'6';5~7') jk;'r~?I;;.'('$~8'?;2:'~4~:r)i-:l;;f!/~!~~':'('$2,~:;'ir3'~)":1i~';:',?':~':'~I~I,!g!~i!~l'd:!~ "',~, ,1_m,;;"mU1;I""..~;J"""''''JJ.,.,U,jl,;U..ll"",',,,,,I,,,,,.,!J;:;;,...!.ilif!.Q;.d "i<"jll>4..,',..~.:.lt...",!.lL,~",..,,_.~ >.I..t.."'......" "'...jl.;J1>~...j...<lI"...""_"~, ,~;_~.-,'" """,.I",,,,,--,,,,,,.,,,,,,,~,",,,,'.h....",,, .,...,~rIAlm"".I...."".....J",l,,---,...,,>-.... ,117, , :iTRA~SI:t n)ND ';' ,.,~,." ,1, n " '. '. :,40P I . - -" - --"- ". - - . -. - . .~... J STAFFING SUMMARY - 401 Administrative Technician Assistant Transit Coordinator Transit Coordinator Transit Manager Transit Operations Coordinator . . . -118- ,', ~<~ t";~ r " I., " ........"'.../j, , '''''r:H! ,..", l' '", tli~r""'",!I'~ 7: J~'; ';it" 'i,l Fi ~'Uj l.j~ j'ii~.I' m',;\~ ~ir ,_,It\ ........~ ,d '\',.Jtc' '. "Mv.r_ PROPOSED FLEET fUND BUDGET .119. FLEET FUND The Fleet Fund is an internal service fund which like other internal service funds is used to finance and account for goods, special activities, and services performed by one City department for other City departments on a cost reimbursement basis. The Fleet Management fund consists of two functions, Central Garage Operations, and Equipment Replacement. Funds are collected on an annual basis through each affected department's operating budget and deposited in the Fleet Management Fund. The Central Garage Operations function maintains the City's fleet of vehicles, both through City equipment mechanics and through contracts with local vendors for more specialized maintenance work, such as major transmission and air conditioning repairs. All City vehicles are maintained by the Central Garage, including those associated with safety services, streets and sewers, parks and open space, and the library. Services provided include maintenance of the vehicles, vehicle fuel, and other specialized services not directly related to any single vehicle. REVENUES Revenues in the fleet fund come directly from affected departments within the City There are two types of charges billed to City departments: 1. Vehicle Maintenance Charges: .These charges are based on the actual vehicles that reside within a department and include costs ranging from routine (oil changes, preventive maintenance) to major (transmission repair) as well as fuel costs. 2. Vehicle Replacement Charges: The Fleet fund charges each department replacement costs based on the average annual cost to replace each vehicle over the vehicles useful life. Most non-safety vehicles have a useful life from seven to ten years. For fiscal year 2009-10, there -121- are no vehicle replacement charges included in the General fund due to the economic constraints the City is facing. Vehicle replacement for fiscal year 2009-10 will be limited to police vehicles and funded through grants and other funds. Fleet Fund Revenues Use of Money & Property Other Revenue Total $ $ 3,491,958 $ 3,491,958 $ 50,000 $ 3,480,978 $ 3,530,978 $ 50,000 $ $ 3,937,770 $ $ 3,987,770 $ 456,792 456,792 0% 13% 13% For fiscal year 2009-10, Other Revenue has increased by $456,770. This is due to increased fleet maintenance charges allocated to citywide departments and the Transit fund. EXPENDITURES The Fleet fund's expenditures include costs to repair and replace equipment (motor vehicles, mowers, generators, equipment trailers, etc.) throughout the City. As mentioned in the revenue section above, these costs are then allocated back to the affected departments based on several factors such as the number of vehicles/equipment, repair history, and fuel usage. Fleet Fund Expenditures Personnel Services 1,045,708 858,597 $ 910,174 $ 51,577 6% Supplies and Services 3,327,178 2,948,621 $ 3,140,554 $ 191,933 7% Other Expenses 500 $ 900 $ 400 80% Capital 76,606 396,543 $ 172,200 $ (224,343) -57% Utilities 1,139 1,219 $ 1,800 $ 581 48% Transfers Out 38,228 $ $ 0% Total 4,488,859 4,205,480 $ 4,225,628 $ 20,148 0% The fiscal year 2009-10 budget for the Fleet Management functions is $4.2 million. This amount is in line with the 2008-09 fiscal year projections. However, it should be noted that the 2008-09 budget is projecting a savings of approximately $1.2 million from its $5.4 million budget. These savings were achieved mainly due to delaying the purchase of replacement vehicles and equipment ($830k) and savings that the City realized in budgeted fuel costs ($360k). The City will once again delay vehicle replacements with the exception of several Police vehicles, which will be funded with grant money or alternative funding. This will result in capital savings of approximately $224k offset by higher anticipated fuel costs in the Supplies and Services category. It is important to note that the -122- longer vehicles are kept in service, the more service and repairs that will be required to keep these vehicles running; thereby increasing maintenance costs. Over the past several years, fuel costs have been difficult to budget for due to its price volatility. The following chart illustrates recent fuel cost incurred by the City, as compared with average fuel costs throughout the State of California. As shown below, the City has seen a near doubling of fuel costs between fiscal year 2002-03 ($1.07 million) and fiscal year 2008-09 ($2.05 million) with a peak of $2.43 million in fiscal year 2007-08. Although average fuel prices decreased in fiscal year 2008-09, they are expected to increase during fiscal year 2009-10. Citywide Fuel Costs and CA Avg Gas Price / Gal $3.00 $4.00 " C C $3.50 oS! ~ $250 ._----~- rn '" ~ $3.00 - $2.00 ~ u $2.50 'C " "- ~ 0; " $1.50 :$2.43 ..", $2.32 $200 " '0 "- c .96" '$2.15' '" ~ . . $2.05 $1.50 > Q. $100 $1 .. x .~ w :-${,28 0; $1.00 c " $0.50 t..._, g "- '. $0.50 rn , u $- $- FY03 FY04 FYOS FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY 10 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Estim ate Budget c:J City Fuel Costs ~CA Avg $/Gallon In 1985, the City Council authorized theestablishment of a vehicle replacement policy and fund to provide for the planned replacement of the City's vehicular equipment (Resolution 1985-11984). Funds for replacement are collected annually from each affected department; with dollar amounts determined by the vehicle's estimated "life" and estimated replacement cost. Due to budget constraints, the City will not be replacing any vehicles out of the Fleet Management fund in fiscal year 2009-10. The City has a fleet of approximately 610 vehicles that are maintained by Central Garage staff with an estimated replacement value of $29 million. Of these vehicles, 77 are owned by the Sewer Enterprise Fund, with an estimated replacement value of $4.1 million. All equipment maintenance and replacement costs associated with these vehicles are budgeted directly in the Sewer Enterprise fund. -123- Am \'.... "". Ii "" '! ~,:," ~'i\; .... .'J~ ;~~" W .'/~, ~lt""'L., ". ,;t!,.>" """ """ '''""''''',"-~,,~''''''w'''''.'''' /.;'llJ.I>'~';""~;~''''. .........;.._.~ Clnt L. ~,' \' ,Ill'" ! 'I.! ."y ";::'" I ,:''1\\ .' ,","" rA'~ "),"'J'. -124- " - "-" . . . I .A;:.lEE~,~AIN>>:GEMIiNI_., 'c" '.. .' , < __ __ ~_1~9).1 FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Utilities Transfers Out TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 1,234,824 3,042,400 1,103,375 549,686 6,574 42,418 $5,979,277 97,740 5,125,897 $5,223,637 !~:r:i1Q7'8-58'~,'5~9?:~' ;:J:~GE:,::t'9T6-',.,174-:-:: 1,045,708 '"""_"""_.,...",. ,,,,,,.,.,t.'l',,.,,,~ ''."._.''',j 3,327, 178 cl.'t..~~21K$..2.lJ~L;J.!).40!'554'W 1 015 242 !s:f;::;'?;I~~/Jf~5(rd1:1i(1~riWT~~Fil[11r9~6'ory~ ' , :"'14." "d"II,.,,,,....,,., ,~" ...:,al"",,,,,,,,,, , "j", 76,606 w' ':' . 'j: ;:'396,'543;1l,r::;:; ~~;~T72:i6(j';-j L_..i<;.iU;,.--,.~..~ ,,",'M,,...;;..J..ILi,~,.,ul;;w!L,,....,......_....,,,,,....J1 1 '139 :'"~,,, '2"-1"9"J~~c '-'IiII''' '1T8"0"0" 'fill 'J:,"'!';' . ~"".~",j,;' J",jL);Lili;','I;&!ii...;_~~ 38,228 ,,1~iI[o]ir:i"']',;1l?ill~!i,:'Q] $5,504,101 $4,205,480 $4,225,627 92,548 4,614,499 $4,707,047 ,-.I....''''..'''.~.m....._..;.,..."..,,..''''"i:)j..,.l'''..''"''.''''"...._.....~r~'" '''2;]1'' ;: }~ii<,j!::;",50 ;'000,;;,1 iiiiHH:Liuii,q50; 000 .i~ .",......_..~....,..___..,.."'..",,:J ,"""..u;.J;J."'"..........."" I'r .' i' 3"'4809i8'TI',,'JD'::-j':"g:inio1r,t ti..,db;; .'.h".""",.', "..,~,,'" ,,!i ,iit;:;.;:i!:",~!:;;.",.,~!.;",:; ,d, ",J21 $3,530,978 $3,987,770 1""',",:nT"','.f'F~''''U'''':''N'''''D'H!i'A''''WC''~:''''''''''V'."\I"T' "v::::.r;lm!;:);;~;;;qjr';;UpilijJr!"::;;;ll.!r11:;_;7j~HQFj::';C("$""7""5' -<<5''''~~6''''4:'-0'''')'1,!~.:!.j,ii~n!-'''('$''''7-'::'9''''71'''!:On'5''''4r''M)''l).'';;,~'"F'j;''('''$~'t'!l6' '~"~'5'.0''''2'''')''Stlflri;Hr'(''$'''l'''',;''3'''''7'''r.8'"5""7""")'1 .NE,l'"" ..,," ,J..! ,',;Int i.l'1i'Jt';;'N<"~114:,..'t'W"lh"'+11l:e1!"!:;;, ",' ".:IV \~..: ,'.. ",.. ''''(!.!I''' ,..7~, .~, ~~':,."'.'ll''' ?,__" __ ' 1.jjj,1'<!li..-ll..11I"~'I_"...,l'...:...:I.:.J.i'HlhJic...'w~~.;d;~jfi",..,jj;.jd",,, ._U";;..,.,:liDt,::m:...:......,..,,'''''"'''';;.J,,........,~.......,...,_''~;t_'L,,'',,~L~jJ.;._.;jL,~"""'""l<lIH,,~,,"'~~~..,,mJ,,'...l~.~_ -125- - - -.~ - . .'FtEEJ MANAf;:EMEN,riFt:JNID . .:. 390,1 . ~ ----- - -..... ~ . ~.-..4_ < _ ~ -k ~. ~ _ _ _ _ _ J. STAFFING SUMMARY - 391 Equipment Maintenance Manager Equipment Mechanic Fire Apparatus Mechanic Fiscal Office Specialist Fleet Manager Mechanic Assistant Senior Equipment Mechanic , .. -126- ", 1~1 ( , ,- ".' , ~m, ~., a .Ii , ."",,,. '"".'" ('"nTH '0.-. . ..... - ]1. /<-J I' .'~">, llr:.'.-;m'..... ..)~., .,,"''''~ o. .,1 I .... I" ""W;,;,'''!)i!.rlr:,:;:;!i~il';'!'';'''''!I'Ill; '1'''f'lf,,,.1 """" 1t:.,."".Il:l..~.ij)j~j..>.l<~:j',., l:l"'irJ'""t ~I ,.; "I' :j ~". ,- I:). d't" "";,'-'w""~. ~~.>>...-If;.",,-~At;.. ,~q' j. l.!. {i'llit !,\ J "', '''h;."..ti'll,,-<I,,~-If:. 'ilf ,'1;\ "<I ,,<.II 'H ,!'" ";"""'11,'.;;.."';1,..."""'" 'I",.",.r.l, ~~,.. ii",.';' q, L ,J l;' ,,:' PROPOSED BUDGET CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS .127. CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Capital Projects Funds account for resources used for the acquisition and construction of capital facilities by the City, with the exception of those assets financed by proprietary funds. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS These funds were established as depositories for monies received from issuance of bonds for various assessment districts. The monies are used to finance the construction of public works improvements in the related districts. Included in this group are funds 501 through 518. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT fEES These funds were established as depositories for various development impact fees. The fees are levied against all new development in the City in order to pay for the construction or improvement of public facilities as a result of City growth. Included in this group are the following funds: Funds 542 - Teleqraph Canyon Drainaqe Development Impact Fee This fee is levied against new development in specific areas of the City, based upon the drainage facility their project will generate an impact on. The monies collected are used to fund construction of public improvements designed to increase the capacity of the subject facilities, allowing the City to maintain service levels with increased demand. Funds 567-582 - Public Facilities Development Impact Fees The Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF) is levied against new development throughout the City to mitigate the impacts of growth on the City's public services. The monies collected are used in the construction of new, and renovation of existing, public facilities. -129- Fund 587 - Otay Ranch Pedestrian Bridqe DIF The Otay Ranch Pedestrian Bridge DIF is levied against all new development in Otay Ranch Villages 1, 2, 5, and 6 to fund the construction of pedestrian bridge improvements, as necessitated by growth in these villages. Fund 588 - Otay Ranch Villaqe 11 Pedestrian Bridqe DIF The Otay Ranch Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF is levied against all new development in Otay Ranch Village 11 to fund the construction of pedestrian bridge improvements, as necessitated by growth in this village Fund 591 - Transportation Development Impact Fee The Transportation Development Impact Fee (TO IF) is levied against all new development in the City east of 1-805 to fund the construction of transportation improvements, as necessitated by growth in the eastern portion of the City. Fund 593 - Western Transportation Development Impact Fee The Western Transportation Development Impact Fee (W-TDIF) is levied against all new development in the City west of 1-805 to fund the construction of transportation improvements, as necessitated by growth in the western portion of the City. OTHER TRANSPORTATION FUNDS Included as a part of this group are the following: Fund 723 -Bicycle Facilities This fund is a depository for local Transportation Development Act funds, Article 3.0, received from the County for the purpose of bicycle related programs. Fund 735 - Transportation Partnership This fund is a depository for the revenues received from the State and Local Transportation Partnership Program. Funds must be spent on street purposes. Fund 736 - Other Transportation Proqrams This fund accounts for other miscellaneous Federal and State transportation grants received by the City. -130- Fund 737 - Transportation Equity Act 21 This fund is a depository for revenues received from the federal government under the Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century. Funds must be spent on street purposes. Fund 739 - Traffic Conqestion Relief This fund is a depository for revenues allocated to the City under Streets and Highways Code Section 2182 and Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7104. Funds must be expended for maintenance or reconstruction of public streets and roads no later than the end of the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the allocation is received. Any funds not expended within that period must be returned to the State Controller Fund 741 - Proposition 18 Hiqhway Safetv This fund is a depository for revenues received from the State government under Proposition 18 (The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Act), as approved by voters in the November 2006 general election. Funds must be spent on street purposes. MISCELLANEOUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDS Included as part of this group are the following: Funds 713 and 714 - Capital Improvement Proiect Funds The Capital Improvement Funds were established to set aside monies for capital improvement projects. These funds do not generate revenues from any source except by transfer from other funds and interest earned on monies in the funds Monies transferred to the funds are expended for budgeted capital improvement projects and monies remaining after completion of a project are transferred back to the fund from which the project was originally financed. Fund 715 - Park Acquisition and Development This fund is a depository for fees collected from subdividers for the purpose of providing park and recreational facilities directly benefiting and serving the residents of the regulated subdivision. These funds are collected pursuant to Chapter 17.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, in accordance with authority granted by Section 66477 of the California Government Code. -131- Fund 717 - Residential Construction Tax This fund is a depository for fees levied for the construction, replacement, or conversion of all dwelling units within the City including hotels and motels, collected pursuant to Chapter 3.32 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Fund 725 - Industrial Development Authoritv This fund was established to account for staff costs in assisting in the issuance of industrial development bonds. A fee of 1/8th of 1 % is charged to reimburse costs incurred. -132- ASSESS DIST:lMpROVEM'ENTS 'F.,UNo. .- . ,S:()(). i ~'J - -' -.. . '- "-~ - ~_ ~ _ "';:_-.-. ._ _- ~ ~_.' .. __ ___'.l _' "__ ___ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Transfers Out TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o 8,937 $8,937 16,420 8,937 $25,357 $16,000 $67,534 95,694 2 54,165 $149,861 103,734 o 28,874 $132,608 $28,472 $28,472 ....'w"""''''''..,....'''.''j'~''''!'...."...,.'''.,.....It'".''''..''~'''~'''a:':)'n..I'~""1I'"!'.1\~.'.'..~..,.,.",...l'."'lf!f':.':'~.,~,...,,-"""""W''''....,.t~'?.:1r,,,...~..,""'~.'<Ij.":"',",' ..t!:..:~"_."'"!"'-:~..,~".~'..~~r'~.'~...'_,~.~".,',.~",t:n",':.' 'NEli'EUNDIAcTIVIT:'lIri,:J,i ,,,11':II'I,r,,:,'i":-;I: ;'li'<'I':~ ,,'1"I"i' ;' ;,1' $140,9241 A;:,I,?': $'107'251 il'lb'l',i, IJI;:' $'12;472 i,;",r:li, /,,($39:062)~ ' ,.,.,,1, c."'," ,....;. '''...'....T.y '. .......' .,c." .,.......".'.."'l, '. '" ,...,'," '........ '."'.. ",m'., ,," ..,..,... .,,,,.,) ,.."',,, """C' "" ,.",.,),!.....,.. . .....,.. "...,..,,,.,,11, '''.', H,...". . .." .... "".r! 1~'.,,;A.I't, .. d~n".""IU"'.",,,Il..,,..... ..."",. ."m,~, ,',!iJlk .. ..., !;J.... ,;,:,I~"~,,i.(l,~. ..,,,1 ,,~. ",j ;L"",Jlilli ...,. ."~w,..",u......"..,,~,,. "'''llti,.,.",. 1.<.". ., ,,,W,,,,,..,IllLnw.j ,"'.' ",,".~. ".I",JL~.,~,~".",,,,..,,,,,, ,.,.l.!;."..dll~..". ',IIU""",lIlj,,, ..... FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 501 Otay Lakes Rd AD 88-2 Improv 503 East H St AD 87-1 Improv 507 Otay Valley Rd AD 90-2 Improv 511 Otay Vly Rd Fee Recovery Dist 512 EL Greens II AD 94-1 Improv 515 Twin Oaks Ave AD 96-1 Improv 516 Oxford St AD 97-1 Improv 517 AD2004-1 Dixon Drive 518 AD2005-1 Tobias Drive TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 501 Otay Lakes Rd AD 88-2 Improv 503 East H St AD 87-1 Improv 507 Otay Valley Rd AD 90-2 Improv 511 Otay Vly Rd Fee Recovery Dist 512 EL Greens II AD 94-1lmprov . 515 Twin Oaks Ave AD 96-1 Improv 516 Oxford St AD 97-1 Improv 517 AD2004-1 Dixon Drive 518 AD2005-1 Tobias Drive TOTAL REVENUES 0 0 0 0 0 7,254 0 0 0 9,166 6,894 6,894 2,043 2,043 0 0 0 0 $8,937 $25,357 0 0 0 0 4,290 4,473 38,407 40,761 47,373 50,684 6,213 8,554 2,280 2,718 12,489 13,815 38,809 11,603 $149,861 $132,608 .133- $16,000 $67,534 6n_~m"~"3n"''''''''''''1''-I'''I'~''~'''''mll~''''''''''~''''~'~'''~ i;C:''i!]':;c;ij, ...;)!.;j11\!;,: 0 lbc:r:'n';"ip"rJI ",:'!'!xO;':', ,.LJ!!L:tmm.LILlillliJl'~_J...lii!H;Wi:Aill:dilil ' LX1J.....,.:;w f'..~'.~..- ,..."....I,...,."."~.. ... '-''rfl "~r ~""""'I.,,,,.....,,l'''''''r<''':;r "-] il'!/ df:";;,;!111!':':'!ij :1>;"'0' "I ;;'if ;kJ"iI1h,li'.,IIi,'!:,jl 0'< . L')t:li;;-:.';;L;IlJ::::;;IJiUiii...:i,~;,;;!;~JiJu::J;;;;jJju.;;j,il!L'N~.. t~ql;il~0r~:!![EO]1!mICi~IJ'mF.illl]mrii~ lfk..""l"'('"",I[',"';."'I,IL.,''','I",!.",!ftlJ",...",,lh"",!!!"",,,',,,I,,,,,,,,I< .'l ',n """': "'('I Ii ~",,,,'"k,",r'''T';;''~''~''' ...~.r~' :'!""~~f':":::~lfl:' ::''1"'"' .". "~.:~.:'" ~'.~ll,r .,~' f.i u~, 6; 34 71 ~If.j 1,' :~'1'1::',,!:,.:J,\6; 34 ?;~iP -,~.'-,........_.,_.,"_~._,_..i;.""'-oll....4......... _.....'...."M_..,j'/ I'" .""" .....'f. Y. . ..,.. "1'.'" 'l"jL" .,...., ,_. '1 ';;!;;:~',Ji.t'i~?;~.~.\2,: O~31,:il ',? 1.1',,'iri1i :',/'h2;043/ !I<;.i,~~"........-.......,.....J.:.l",~ ...___"-.........til "'''''J:-''.' .11"1.0"0"7.0. -: J:J":IiC'. "",r,:.-1."0"6t0. 'c) 1i..',~J~L:i !~;-,-,,,.:.,,.Jit0.J.';J:iti.L!:L:j. _",!__L';,;J] p''''''';-,rT6'012"'1'.-,i~!..." "'ji".'W01 i'" E!0:J.:!L-u;..1:Jl!L...!......,-,,_ki:j. 1Di':':;j <liL."_'~.........,,.,j $28,472 $28,472 . ASSESS DISTr IMPR'OVEMENTS"FlJNfJ" , ," 50'0': -' .~- ..... - -::: ~- -~ -' '" "--,,,--.....-r ~ ,_. _ __ -=-_ _ ~ w _I _ '. _I r:-::--..m<-~..mr-~"'-';,-..r<":,#?ij!iir::r;;;?;,~'T,~;'~'l~I'II' ;J0'~'~'!~;I:rt~:TI'-$'1' ~-_. '-"''''~~,-.:'~' .:n::-$ 1".-....";..."""""'7r;;i-;"i7"'t:$' ~";J-...,.-;.7::.:::;;..,.........,'~;lID..,.~ NET,E1.UND A~,TIVIT,Y, ,m',""'", "", "1'" '",i" 'I" ,>"" -' , 40,924 ",I' .'" 07,251, ,,,I,, '" g~i'21 ' <,,($39,062)1 L:....;;,I. M,,,...,j,,J....,!!.,,..,,,J....,,,,. .......... -"..IIW"-."",,,,,. "'''''',""", ,........'".. ,...<~"~,L",J,__,""~.,..,,_.,,,,~..."_..,,.,_ ,- ;_~~.,.~, ~,.".~ ~...",.."l.,; ,~; ,A..._,_"~,,,,,,~__,.Jlli..~, ....,~,,<i~,.~'"'.. ,:.~",,,U___.":".,,,.,,,,,~,,_, >~.<l~'; .it -134- ;: T~L.EGR~Plill,~AN~ON,;DRAIN'AG~ -r)I'F'I~l!.J'fNi[j, .f 5'42 ' - ~ - ~ - ~ - - - " ~ _" _ _ .J FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 1,731 14,375 $16,106 1,027 28,590 $29,617 !"...'9.....,1""". ..".-. 111.... "'11'-' .",.." ...", , dt'l~:'~,~~llSlliill1;iL2gli;j:'22E.'jttlh~ifi1illi~JF~~ig!!~ c:'~'m~n-~"'~"--ij ,:., }i"<l'!;r." ""'1"'1'01');-'-1250000' ',,'. :!t,'\>,~ l;i:kd:,.': ',: .:<,!,.j ",\". '," " "., ,,',I "H~,m,~,~',"I... ..,'""...',." ..""',~",', ",,;U k<"",,"'.'~'~nn"',""~"m'~; $69 $1,250,000 259,977 537 $260,514 278,120 o $278,120 $0 $0 F<""'.'!::'f""""''''''''''''?I-''''''''''''''''-''''''''''''''~',';t'i1'''''~'r~rtMl'~;~''';:7,,''.''''m.!~~:'t~~m""'7'--~"""""-r""..,.,,,-.,,--"""""1"-'!t"j:;""'(';'rr.-~~"""'''''''''''''''~''''I''~-'''"':"Tt"'.."...,'l'!,......"""~ ;NElj,FUt:JD,ACl:IVIIy,:j.1'I:' :;:.-",1:..,,1::";; ;, ,:< "11';:;'.:;1,1.';'111 $24f1;4081,.:",j'.;:'I:,;,$?48,503 1,.':."1,,,,;" ;'" ($69);: 'Ii' '($1',250,000) <,'"""Jjl".,I','llllll,;;,,,;,,;;',,,'I,,,,,,,(;,:,th^L,;'..'..'ml!.j'"",;!iL"..;";.!;llr"",;..,Jn,,..........,....:"I,II,',..,.,.,If1,,,.,,..,.,";,,~",......,"'~,,dj"';jl;!jl,."..""',Ul"~.........."!.....I'I,',,,,,'1,'i......,,iffi~,,,.......;..,1,ljjijt,'";~tul"....;.."'j,.....;..;..;,,.Jj,';1i\~jl",~;"......;,j""!l,,,;.-;,;,.,l .135. ; IfU:fn,lc 'f.AOln~,I:I:S DIF' - , " , ""560 'J - . :l:".-' ~ - _ _",~.l:f..-~_ ..n "_-"'~"""A -'___A' ~'~~.1. ~_..J:,_ __~ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 294,784 542,484 302,992 9,346,703 9,741,309 $20,228,272 990,861 2,130,561 848,315 560,905 $4,530,642 008it!~, OO'~!I!lOOID" D:-, 27,210 214,671 15,293 4,749,018 9,251,576 $14,257,768 32,258 2,861,465 1,337,031 o $4,230,754 i01l!:7JF"2n<-0-6""'5"-0'Q'j": ':7,ri'!?r~Jti:'il'rm'0'~r" "-"II.!I' '!. 'i,~ ; .. "', l:;I'!'lfk;''!;ltli;;" ,,11r;: .'''! m..."..",..... _", .,..._. ,"".,....w~.. It..r "~..;I.JL,ili"A.,,,jJ""_""....,_,;; r8l':~8L;I'i'l789"54@["'~~!~:;,~iTI;IT~~0lf1 .('.,1,."'_"" I. ......J!",.J",....."...!..,....",,11'...', ".... O1.JJ...,,,,;>;;; .k ......_. ~"ll..~".,." _.;_.,;.j..".n"'~I... 'N,l...",., ,,~,._ ~::?'J;I';rO; 6otfi:;~~iJ;;~~:~~hl!~!TlT:r:~O>~ ,.ljJL.,.."il."....."'''''<;..,,''''''',.,j,;tkn;,,,I,'~,.....;'jttrlK..",,,,'J';'<,,i'''',';,', :~-"~--~-";-'-'-:'Jr""J,:"'-r"-""-'-~~'-'---1i , J;;,I:":;,? 9,9; 2,!,0,: II! '(~'" ,5 ;,?Zti;5'3~j!': I'nf.i~J";{'~iIFr('6'-8"''''3'''-2'"''8''M~:1 YiH'I~;',:'2!::.:.;rjt,,;'j'I!W'j~'Ow'~'!j ';1, ....,.... ,( . .', ,,;' ..".,,'..,,','.' "..' "IL.,. .." ~"_L,,~,,..l, ,. ._",h .,,,,,,,,,,,..)/ . L..d"~",'",~dl;r."'fi>.:l"",,,~",,,J $6,257,922 $5,275,538 1."il,~~fj;;'T'7(lW:lI~r:iir:O"~"l:nrW,it}.'l''ttn' )'UiitW:'1:-0':;~~ Ii;' Wh.."h, i'~'i'; ';.",. .-" ",' -' y" ','i,h..,,;.';. iY'-''' ,J-{. '". dY:;:,., ."..:.,."./...ii:\,':lIli,.., .1 WL\"dl'~',,"', ,~l ",,,;::!;I<,, \'_'1':;1 (;i::'I6':85'ii;425,i:'I'Tr';rii'11~'256:'~ }!"~..,,...1._. ",....11....... ,"'"'''~. ,,,.~ ."".__.",~,,,,,.,,,..L,, ""'W~'"'''''' 'l,il,l~n;::iirG1j:iW'!f;[2i,1li:~0" T'j '~';i: ';'7if!1;iF.'iiplj':,'Jil~t:':'0'" ';; [, 'I". 'I".l'...' ',ib.' i" 'i',;;"",.. ,t,"k'Hi,", ."jl~~,~l!'!fI. . '>II ~j ~l trn_I._.....,""'.."i....._,IJ.. . ",~....,;,......"..J'L""''''W;ll''-''_,' "'W" ,"S'24'8261 "1r.",';"e"5"j6oToo(f, i~:t:;LL....!,...I4'"" '...-...-....::~Il2;;.,.:.~~~....;...!.......,,::lii:i $12,102,626 $6,111,250 f''''''''''''',.':.'''''''-''.:,'''.....''\:J'''l''',' """'''''':'''''''''''''"':'::l;i.nr'~ ~ii~!J.1;:;!"'!'!Uli~H'TliJI:'>;"'Fi:~:.t:'I~!'II.,nl'''''''.",,,",,,,,,,."'''m-'''''''''i~''I''''''111~j''''''''':'''.''''':'''' ".""""~"":';','w-''''.:..,.iW'~JV'''''''''''.;':''''''''"""''''''';~:'iW'''~ : ,jjlll;.i!'-'''I...''''''''1W'.''''.....(J'' .NEr~FUND'AC1IVI!~IIHI~"I"I'"tll,;j'~I' I '~~I,'T'I\g, ~1,($15,697 ,630)1'I($10,027,014)'IWj' $5,844;704 '1'", Iii, $835,712.~ .,.."!;ll,k..""tll;h",,,t;,I.," 1,,,1 "', . A~J,m',"',U. '.,..,,,,,,,(,,,' ""W"'.",,;jJ ,,, .",,~lI,'.' ...,ifJ,,,,, ,)/.."...","'"'."".,,'...,,,.... ..JlU.l".; ~"", ,...".<ilIl""..,...II,!"",..,..'llI.i",.",...kw"""I~"",',,.'II.,,''d"W,~"""ljl"..."JIL,,,,,,,,jW__,;,.,,~,d, ,.";;M,>:""''',,,''''d.Jm,,, FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 567 DIF-Adamo Property Acquisition 571 General Administration 572 Civic Center Expansion 573 Police Facilities Remodel 574 Corporation Yard Relocation 575 Library for Eastern Territory 576 Fire Suppression Sys Expansion 577 Geographic Information System 578 Mainframe Computer Expansion 579 Telephone Switch Expansion 581 Records Management System 582 Recreation Facilities TOTAL EXPEND'ITURES REVENUES 567 DIF-Adamo Property Acquisition 571 General Administration 572 Civic Center Expansion 573 Police Facilities Remodel 44,030 580,611 3,915,497 2,131,919 1 ,486,094 5,543,042 5,360,953 41,926 o 245,811 o 878,389 , $20,228,272 22,684 228,525 1,514,438 512,764 -136- 45,351 219,113 11,017,622 1,778,721 1,047,011 49,822 53,423 o o o o 46,705 $14,257,768 21,862 113,019 3,146,323 377,131 "''''''''''mt''''''''''_.'''-''~'''' ",.,t rF"";~"l!"''''''',m-'''^'~r ",. ......"", ~"'1'1:,,;:t~!1!.?Jij~,i,d i:t~~,1,,13,i Pffi$JJF~nE{4"17r6'34::i'l"lt:~'i;iTIr:fmi'fiJITwn:1n;rrWFi:6'.:!: Lil:!*m;,.4I:.....J.,~, .._..w.l~! i'_'Il._,.:I.:ll!.:,ul';jtL;.;;;;.....;w ":;,,:", 2:,'452"92 i'Vi:"'~;2"39'215627 lU"....;;J......,'."""....J.."',...,. ..:;;j:J.;."~J.jJ.;,,,.l.,,'-"--,,.,,' :...,,,,,...,,j;', ~ ",1 77'9"01'5"iP ':~i',:1:;Y36'63'~n .mJ:, J' ,;J...: ,;...; ,.i..,.. '., ".i"" ~i;iJl F', i .1; li;;~;~ '.~'.....h ,,,,-,, __ ~.... '.'" ~"..IJj'- I j::'I~'! ,J:i1'45:'540TI;':Ci):r:'1'f098~2[r6:+ ,:.II M......._..,.n";;.'j~,....""",,, ,j'll ,.".",1..,",,,.....,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,'.. '..""""". ,~""""-''''-..''''-''' -jr:-'''''T''-'''''''~'''I "'''''I 'li,,:,',,:) ik"', 31"'1.2211. ',1,1 "~'~;~!I;';i!fiJ,'at"O\J! 1i!EiJ!; ,lb,;...;:,;"..",'.;";"",,,;!;' ~,;;)!)J'h";~::JM'0i;!;jjM::':\,,,,;~,;~ "fj~~!Jr;,J;r,.,),::g:J4"';'''6-'5. '3",'111' l'li'~I""\i;:~!tI),'i'ji'l"nri1;;g:"O~'" I' 'j',,; 'jl' .1' .."I",;' ./1 .:__'~"';I" .",'';~'I' :,' jl~I~'" .Im in ,;'I~,I,:""",jL-."-"ue.".!;"~,.".,,,,.. "";,,_1.1;,,.1.11. ...".llU!;;;,,,f,,,.--liJ ~'I'" """':"f'I'':1'"'' tllf'''P''!''''''''ro'' """"'I,u""""~!""""'t"r"""""."''''-',,; \;, I;;': '~" ~',,::~I;'~i ,:~i',4 ,,~ fi, 0,' 'l!~WJJ~! r.;::',:I'''.:,:iRi:';ldii,r O:~ t.......,,'.,~~ ""~I>ifj,.........::.J ."..J~"",.....j"'I~'mll..U;"",;...,.,. ,..,,,,, "'rn",.'...''''I''''-'.'.'''I'I'......lll.''.'.......~'''''''i' ~";;."~,,,...,~...,..,,, 'I' "I'"'' "'O~" "" 'I'll' "0 liii4!iij'lt"iV:j-,,'ir',,"',.,. ," -''''';!''i..!'iJ,I!F..-I, .,,-',{ ""'1 ~lJljjJ...;J,I1L.~..Jw"'{,,/""""';J!:,j;::J;;":J.J "l" ''''''''1''''1'''' '''~'''''l~'''''' '"'I''''''II''c",,,,''' ""1(...':':'-""". -,..:n91",-,,'fllitOO"':"lii "':""'i)",;"-""..-.-"I.,,,,:,,:., p'!"":"":'-.O" b.::t!t.tll",ll~iiiliL'i;'d~~I';~';Jij ,U!ri;;,t. ,it:;,;,. 1(; '~"""""'""I''''''~'''~''''''~'' .-,~ 1...""',..r".....""ml'I:!' ''''''''--''1 "', 't,' '" '''1'110 ", '1'1" "0" '~I~':',.,.. ;, ''''''iiH..,','''','"", ., . iij '''''''';:)..'I''''-''''i " -"."'" ,t..'. ',,'1 .,,,.; k.......ix ,'l!Afij~."'>>i.dlt:... ;J;;;;....,:,DWii uw . W:;';I<.,,;;I; IIJRWiA:';l,ltJ( 43,;6 81lIHmrm~inm~7f:!i',:!..';!lff!i:':'rrH!O);' 11""....._......, b.... ,,-'.....,. jl.."...,lil~wllii..",.......,,~.~.,....~ $6,257,922 $5,2i5,538 rr;,]G;l~;TI,SIIt:i]F':I~',!); 6!jhE-;;; 'i',:I'l':'i.:"I:' 7~!:1,1 ~i,,7[i o:,~ i...iI,,,.~,I..,,,,.,,!iw,,,,....,,.~,,!,,J;J 1.i."...J""""d ("",illl". ",f..~", !""""",m,_,,,___ 7Jr~".'2M".",,~,m~~ ,;iI;"':,~: 6~9" ,1,::;0,,,,: '.;"I,,~.:,~6':L 49,2 ,I, 1': -;;'1""936"'700 :'1; ':"~":'1;,"2'041' 1 1'6'1. j hl,.,":..L:,jj,.,i,' "",".."".' .,,",~" .10; jf;"l~,j'~"d"jl;..,,,..,:,,, '. 'i."", ,,:;, ~ "-'n''-;'~''--'".,,,~,, ."",-~_.>"..-! """t:.-;,-'-'" ,1r:'T'''''~'' ..,.... "", 'j I' ''''"'1 516'350' I'"'' 'm,148,260"l JJt{F:I~.;.'.'I~'4"'."._,~""iJJ 1;!L.:::;"i~~~;,.}""...!~ ,~....,,,,,~t. ,PtJ'BI:'ICEl\CILlTiIE$ 'OI,F ' -. , ".. 560 - i -- - " ,,. - ~-.. - - - - - - - _.., I 574 Corporation Yard Relocation 575 Library for Eastern Territory 576 Fire Suppression Sys Expansion 577 Geographic Information System 578 Mainframe Computer Expansion 579 Telephone Switch Expansion 581 Records Management System 582 Recreation Facilities TOTAL REVENUES 476,385 605,734 526,269 278,075 74,029 5,158 177,803 108,778 $4,530,642 332,684 608,302 (411,998) o o o o 43,431 $4,230,754 \'..... '-'.".,'-'''',-, r""'''''"I''"'''''', '" W t,:.1~;:,j:,~;.,y)~g ,"~,QJ)J,,,~~;)I:~i;,il!;/;tl;~,,1g,;!~ ':......_-,. ',':.''!!!-'-- ""~T"-""~".'" r<"~::'~"f!\'l'*W"-""'." ........ " "'1 L':. ,_~9,\?Q,9~,Q,::J1 ~.L~~:1,1~,3.?Q,J j:;:;;.~;'::J";,::':~78'~li,15'66'-,'j\:,::'_;,i:1F}P'1'2j'~;6T5nil ~,.l\,;.=.:n........,,,,,-...,____J ..._._..............._.~ ..._...........!J r:~_~!J2251;lt;~r~.KQ][!~:~ijrjE2IIJBL~f.9Jj ! ;'?' ;~rr:"7i\n;;;'l~I'nn'm--::'Jl;':, 'w;rn,~1 ,iT;;~'m~!rr,."7J, .'- -"I)"... ..;.".,.w....,!.! HJ... 0 "'l",'!I!^+!t. "M.,!!ll1"'" -'0._ ,::~_~,~j~,m::J1;~)i;;;':'.";'!:';;I~jj;:.~'j;~Ii.L'i;;:;'::_.",> t,:';;U!!:;!.'Jii!:',!i,.,jQ~'.,:;'jjg~"i;~~I5J~lil~m!~l~Ti~9,] !2;i'7.:",j'.7!:i;:;nr'pijr()::V'-:'1~~''7f;']r.tf!::-nlj1 ';i,~Jtii",';1';,L;:";i'illbl.".,:ui,,,'i;;'imi\..,:,,,;;,L,:!:;;jil~J,;:;,:"i.u",,;~11 ff':,I'jl);~r-6~92"~j'ig~:1j>1:'T~;:'7;-;F1(59'.:i5b"~r :~:~lL,!;,:l~.".; "'_ 'll".,,,",,,,,,;!; .~;.":;"n iic,i'i;;:: ";>~""',"_'H _,;:~ $12,102,626 $6,111,250 ~.~< """'~"""""".~"""'" '~".'" ....,,,..."~";.lf".. ""'~"".I;""\""']'-.:';;1"."t:^"'.:.JP""';i'!.lr-';"',,"":11: !l'.....'7'n..".... "!"" """"'~"..". ' ..'"'.,...,..,..~..'T'0. ."t~''''''''..-.'''.''.-'lw'\...":''~T'-';:-;.:t~'''''~''J:.'',; ;""'~'f~""''';''';':;'.':.'.~~r'. "':."1.~;.,.'''>!'''.'''.~,..''....--.:.:..j NEl:iF;UNQ' i\CJIVIT'(;,;!,";";: .!,;;o'IH':::"~ i:--lf):, "~"~I} ($~ M97,630); .:-($10,0,27,014) ,I't ',$5;844,70,4:;:,:':,:,,;, $835,7,1,2, ;"1'.... ~lJl.i";;',,"l1M,,, "dlllJ,...; '; 1">l..~'u.,fl,I~,,. .;;.,.,'''',~.,,~I...;, .,."""1-".:,, '~i.,~"..J.:llI,,;, ~.,,,:l,"',,I,l"',,;.;; .- .,~~lI.I,,',,'~.,.!~...m~..w;"...'w~_ ;; ;; ,~;,_.'.".."'I,k;.'m"mJ<1", ".~."""".IL.,__....~_'n."."lJ,;,, \< ,'~,_. ,",;;IW,M,. ", :.;:.....,".;UH;.l; ,. ",..i~,~",., , -137- : P~l!)ESW'IUA:N, BR:loqE on '~(t:JN'O: .: ..'. " '5'80 ;,: "- - - - - - ~ - - -- -. - ~ - -""'"-- FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Other Expenses TOTAL EXPENDITURES 639,090 $639,090 REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 157,161 262,696 $419,857 1,233,609 $1,233,609 ,~~~'~~~~'~.h"J~,,-,"<~,""!,':""""""":l""-'-'!""'--"7'1 :,; ;;',1,079;566;' "1.";;[1,,;:,,/46;200"; t.J~')'_"_''''''''_'''''''''''''''hM L.lhi."JIll,,,".Jl""'" .,.........."J $1,079,566 $46,200 138,427 271,292 $409,719 !! \;1''2 '!i'I!0iiJ /i;~C::'~D-;r;Jif, i',!, : ';!:'!;:'IJ;00}I"i' o:!,~ i.~i;;(;' ;:~,i!i '::,!:/-iH,;.;;:U,n" ",-'-J ~'l,!,);,iml;j;;',;']i).':I:;;';im:;,;"",,!!;! r;~f::1i::!1I~~?<t1l;Tz~~a~Jl;~~&1i,:~]T9~9,:iJ $421,178 $90,000 ,'~,....~"~r""""""""~"~T''I''',;','.~r''''''''''''''-;;;'7'71'';;jr;jnr~i_1~t;J1'~t~!;lri"~;~~';lrt-""""-"':-"""""""yq;~u;::'~'-:";''''1''7' ""f:"~"'.n;;n1""~""''''''''''''''"'~''''''''~!ir~1Im'!:''F'.''''~''''i:'''''~t'!'':ml [NET FUND' ACTlyrrry,..,.." ',"',:I( I, "1""1,; ,..' y,...",,: I, ""'III" ($219,233),.:J",J;'," ($823,8~.o>" ,J P '" ($6.58,3811)' I "1,,1$43,80q, ,,~,,',"'.,,'il1l~ ,'.,..".;,Il"","""'~'L'. "',;Jllj,,,,..j,,ll,h...,,..;,,,,,, .;'. ,; " ,."'.' ,. i~1 ..... 'j..la,,,",".,,ii4j,,,.,,,,,,, "., ",<,.""...""...,,~,, .,;, .,...l,~..,._,,, '.'ow ~";j'J.,.""j1j,~,,,",,,.j;l,....... ,~.w""..d..,..". ,"'II.,...... ..,,~H.,..'w,lllru,;; " ..1, ,u"'..A~I",,,..,.,.\IIII",..".., FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 587 OIF.OR Village Pedestrian Ramp 588 OR Vlg11 Pedestrian Bridge OIF TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 587 DIF-OR Village Pedestrian Ramp 588 OR Vlg11 Pedestrian Bridge OIF TOTAL REVENUES 638,764 326 $639,090 78,207 341,650 $419,857 1,233,609 o $1,233,609 ,m:;:;,;'n '6'76 .j6EHnl;"~i""ii'::'4-3 'oii'6 ,ill L.:';':;uj;"'~!'''''''''''''''_~;,-.~,~:LL",,,.dtiili;~....!_~,......;;.UJ .-, "" -' '-", ..'" " B);.''''''''I'''''Ji' "....1 [J; ""i "'3200U ,.." '3200 .': "~". '.',,' :;"';. . " ""'<""JII"',":'., 1.:1" , 'l! M'b'~LJJJ:"u-,~_ .:' . f"~~'~'_~4L~ $1,079,566 $46,200 57,760 351,959 $409,719 h";;j ,..'t"'II,:,: 17 1:;78111,::'''' ",iIii"r'4iY,'000,m ~ Uk...:,.. lJi...'._::,]",...,.J.;J.., .:IUl~"!.;.::...,:~"~l_..~..,~._,,,,,,,J !::li'r;:25"0~6'o6,!r:!i;,);'':;ipill;'56'' 00'0111 ;.,!;..."...,b..,;.,..,,,,,,.,,.'..,,,,.......,,...'.':1Ii.hJ',";;;),;!;,i'-i,;r"""".'....,,,,,,,,,,,lli $421,178 $90,000 'NEiQ;UN DJ Ac,iiivliiyi;:;~iil!~i;;~::::"~1Ir,i::;;I;~!';!ji'l~~1~ri$ ?19,233F:F;: " Y$823;S90 )(;:"'::;"'($658 ;388 j"i,~;~;.,;,:~~;: $4'3 :aoo;,1 w.~I" ",'ll:JI",.w,I,,,,,,,..,,I"'c,.lIq,,..lljo<,,,,lffiIL,,,,,....,JJ,!""h''''m"""'',,,l~R, ,1,;,J,.",,,.,,,,1""~'''''IllJf....l,,,,,,~,,,'''lll~ ,. ".",01,,,,,,..,. ,11lI,1.."",..j,~"~,.,.jl,,,.~,,,.."'HMIj,..,..i!,,..,,,.,. ,Jb....,.. ,.lol-i,~,.",,,........,...,,ljL.,,,,. (~..;'.jh,j;jIlW;.,,,,,...,,",,_,;J .138- TRANSPORliXif,ioN-liIF FUND' - - - , , 5'90\: j . - . .' -- -... -. -- - - _ __ _ . ;t _ ~ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses Capital Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES 105,727 842,479 60,542 7,008 456,252 $1,472,008 REVENUES Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 1,224,923 719,921 o $1,944,844 47,143 2,419,673 o 4,156 738,403 $3,209,375 1,171,546 471,713 o $1,643,259 r^'i~':m~':7l'=''' ":il.n''''-''''~,1 j~'rc'H!ilr: ....,....,:'r'::..~'m.jlf ,]i:il~~,L?:,!;1,QQ.o,~JljIH,q"i:';/!i..i.~1d.;Q9...o~j /- :':.:----'-. .m.....,.._'~'M'1mm:...'...1..'fl.'"'-.-.,.._w_.-~jl :. :"Li580:916I' "::")",,,580:9,16,1', . ._.._.......t.. ,.........._Jo..lU,"'.........______ r;r::rr '~"~Fr~:-;'TI::rr,,:rr,.i;r0-'''-'I''Wir:::;qr:7f;~:'.l" '(;-0";'] 1, ':>< dd:':<J' Uiil',wNi"."'''''' :,:-, 1",,"';';"";'!';:"",_"!li!:>;' 1,1;,:: ::1, u. ........."". .,1ll,;;:..I_..;;lJ.,_,,~..J _. ""',""",,'~ .. ~..~ Il\,"';^...~" [;'~;,iJ!'-::::,80:n,'t;-'"';:,t'5:30(I;OO0i1 1l;..~,1l._".,~.. il~,.'.... .,; ,,,,;"';,-,. h..........tlt.... .~,,~.,~. ''',,"'' ","'-'. ,,":;::'7,22'i';'41~1 il:I~~i,":2: ii45', Cmen Ii;:, ,;; 'ilL",...,......,..""',.,, .ll,"~......"., M J,. n.!L:", ."..h~",.,".'.'.,n .w,~!,; $1,193,604 $8,936,916 ~"-="~"~-r ~--iir'1 "--,~" "".,.,...= ".;., ""h;. ''''I';;;'',''J'i,';'.1' O'::'J ","""..,.;. ,.,.,.,,'FI1"'..0'," .".".;~I,<.,,;'iI' .';.:;.11'.'.'"'' .:'; ,; .:.:. 'l""":';) ,k"...', !" l,.'. '''"w'l4;i":,-ajlJ:j">l:;!.:.Jt'4frL,..."",L.,,,;.!t.ln;~''''''J:.;,.;...111!....!1J..," ,~S~ "';:i50,oool1f:?""",.--ts"670efo:J L^"......,;;i<l,~"....,M, ,',"'k''''''''''..' w",;.dljJb.,."~,,~,,.. """,;.,,,l,<ll .;1;:::'1'/::1'80, 0067"11'1:',1:,1 '402'1'50'0'1 L\;d;~,>:.,.U~,,;...,..,....'.." ",,,~,~ii\i .,w :..:.'!!lll~,' !,,~,;.,.'. !"~";;IJ!,[, $930,000 $2,152,000 """"''''''ff""""~",.........,,..,...,,~,,,,~,,..-,,,.,,....<''mlfll-'"':'~''''K<lJryI0T.l7''''~'''''~'"'fl'~~":"Ir.;J'!"l""""'''':~l'''''''''~rr:r'-''-'''''''r::-~~.'~r'r''1i.~'''''''''-''''_~"''-'''''''''''''''''''''''m''''~':"mTttI''':',...........W INET f;UND ,'ACliIVIJiY!i,i, ;1:!(,;;:Hi:",,";i'i'!,II' :', Ji'n!:"~<',~ 'JI'I" ';;1:1:$472:836:;"1:1,($'1;566,1:16):" ];;'1"($263:604) 1;1,($6,784;916) 1t.........:l.JJ~lJiJ,;lI;;,.:.;;m.,"..lM;IU...wWlj;Wtliiii.Il~;r..1i.'Jw !,~"j"""'l<il' ~ em ., ".:.::"J;.;..~;'~'~tffi~m""""""",.;L;d....~~.j!'i' ",',...j,''l.....>:,;;;w ' FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 591 Transportation DIF 593 Western Transportation DIF Fund TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 591 Transportation DIF 593 Western Transportation DIF Fund TOTAL REVENUES 1,472,008 o $1,472,008 1,944,844 o $1,944,844 3,209,375 o $3,209,375 1,643,259 o $1,643,259 n:;;;-:-17"0 13"6047f:/P"11 8 936':91(3:1 !u;;;U:;;".:",.,I_,~,,_.,1 ,~.",,_Jj~ t~:: ;/ix.." I, ,,'~....~, ~.~L...~;; rrn".".,-' 'NI~-"""'~'-'-"""" ,..!,/)'..".:~[ 180'000'1 Jilli:;''''i.'';]II'ffi-1''iJ i1jl'0..in ,:;;;,liiLi...;i;Iii"""""'....,,,,,,,..;i;.Jlr'/,i,.iil);..;i;i.lU::;;Rlijjfii":, ,,,;!i;; $1,193,604 $8,936,916 r7D"'iJ75-0~ OOQ':lI'!"'CI"', 2f152 :ooWi 1>,.;!iJ!i>.~,Al,.. .,,",~ ".v;,....."o:,l:Jk ...;~..w"'J~".,.,,. ".!~";,,.,.,,~!t..' f'm-::;;:;r''fiicr60o '[ll'~';I<!!r:-::'i/lI!li;;:'Q"r1 ,. ';;;il;'!/:;~!~b".-.""".!. ,;,;".".,;',J !1J;j;:'ii)!lJli:':'Oi~:;~;:,dI;l'I,:,c: ",';iL: $930,000 $2,152,000 ................"-r--=t-;-"",, 'I ., "'11. 'YT:i~ffl'~::;;;;:p:W~~~I'~"""'~'~:''1!I'':~'"~'''''~'''''''''r.1r::m'''::-'--~~~~.J:l_''''-'''"~"'>I""r;;JO.~""'" NET:f;UND'A<;,lil~lvy.I',ir' ii, :'.:':11", ' ,II":" I"" ,"li,(::I;,:''';:!!,.', $472:836;:: ii", ($1 ,566,116 ),i/1i'iI'" ($263;604 In':':' ($6, 784,916), w.........,,jI.......'-;,,I;<."';;,,\-J'-',j,-",l.il,,.J.ul!ll,("',~ '--'--'.J,u.:,C4i:.':ii1];;",~,,,JII,,,,WL1';J,u;:,,,,~.~...~,........<,_,,,.,~..l:li;::J1JI,w,,_h'..,iliii....;,.~ ~'.... ..;".i1lJ:,~,,,.~,...,,,,,~,,~,....._,,....!,4J._.,,,,,<,.~itW.:,,,,.......,,~,,~...j "139,, MIISC C~P'II~tIPROJECTS :FUND- . .- ,:::' ],00. ! I '~.: - _ _ _ t- _ . " _ ~ _ _ ___ _ _ _ , .., _ . _ -.l FUND SUMMARY o 100,000 721,392 15,266,985 $16,088,377 393,650 2,688,192 7,980,398 37,596 o $11,099,836 o 12,303,540 1,961,650 1,823,187 o $16,088,377 o 860,937 9,638,675 599,788 436 $11,099,836 -140. 7,500 1,019,145 718,405 5,140,904 $6,885,954 151,325 2,146,264 1,468,781 o 1,102,129 $4,868,499 o 4,816,511 693,302 1,376,141 o $6,885,954 o 1,225,614 3,388,061 254,354 470 $4,868,499 [~nJJ,;f:;i~':iQQQ'.:r:t~rfJn;J:];l0t!~:r@, ~I,' :'-,}:;;i:'1:,2'b'3:'6'ii:r~ "';~'U%C.;;i~~25r6'66!!i[ i,';.,l>i!' " oJ..', j, <; '.,",,' "J) E...-.,.-'......,."''''..,....r''.~........._....'''.. I;: ''''';. 681,358".,[.'.:.:": ".679,242.... ......."".....~...__,,_<:..l A,,,,,~_.,,,...~._........il '~~-~~"'"'r'~--~_.QTIt'7'~''''''''''~1 .,' ).9,1',15,750.,., ;',;ill 2,000:000::, L,kl!..:._.._.."....;l..,. ...._,_,-' lli.''',il,'l;,,''',''''.~....,...~.,";~,..,;, $11,015,778 $2,704,242 EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Other Local Taxes Use of Money & Property Development Impact Fees Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES ~t.,--;r,;p-200' 00...0')....'..,.' ," ;;;:;-5'0''''0''0-0i7! .o..'i",'o, , ,"',,',"'" "0"';";""".., i... '''diJl)J)h.-,,,,,,,,,,.......,,'''.,.,,,\'.,,j L;M.1L..... ,'tilw",.",.,~:.n:."."Jn U-:~-:-:'I~I ' ":;T~"1'-0"'f'W~~<1O";i"1~''lJ''''1'71ro-1nj F'r,~!.',,':i,;I,!lfI'.W.. "I'::,',j'!';!(d'".'I';':i,},I""", ,II "" ,'" "~hl"".jjtu"" "lr~b" "llll "',, "','~""'m;,,"" "_,A""""""_,,,~,,, [; i',;'1'o6b'606:1'i;:;'l:'J5b6''Od-6~:i ..;,,,, ~,...;,.,,' "_",, ,;'._"",,,,-,., I, '~'''''M'~,I.Al"""",j,,,!,,..,,,,,~,,,,,,,, ~!~'7;~,,"i;""'!'I!'?':::T:;lIl'r""?J"W rO:'t'llI;'.'/'"'jl-'''TT'MF'';;"''t''' H .Ii l'-l1:"!1jl!i*~"; J 0 1!;;'~"":':111,l"'. 'k~ii~!'h 0 ::;j .....;......I~~.Jr~ll...r"'. 1,~;:;;nM.~;;m_:;:tl.W!lu~_.:!W f]HYI1!fiS'i!miE~q:~t!'i;JQ5il~2iN&q;'Q[Q1l@ $1,200,000 $610,000 i"I'" """"'1"";; """""""'''W'''':'''''''''',,',,',' ''''''':', "'tj'~':,':"'!"'~,'!,w:..'.',"'7'r;'!,':~W'[",,"i'~'l'i,,'mW!"':"'-"~~"';""I"~I""' .."-..,, """""l",,',ymr.,r' ,,'" "': ;"'I"""":"'!"'''''''''I~'7,.''.':''''et'' "'"lI;'''''-;!',~I't''''-'''''!''r",;''m'~''' "'~)'*";;_'\!""I"""""""": ,NEl;.F.UND.,iACnWT,Y", "'" 1'1::", ;;;iiIJ' i,3 I!' l,i,jl~'I:;) I' :1',~i;JI:($4;988,541 ):;"''',($2:017 ,455)i,.;" ($9 ;815;778),'", ""($2;094';242),1 .......,;.'I,j/Oi j;;l;>Il~'lW<",'~rfn'i""'t.il;"i:II'~,lWil.". ~..Jl~;:.;;:;..:.;w'lm~.tl;';,;..:...-l:"~ illJ..........,;i~"_~....:~:.:..;;."~,k>""":::...;;,_~....;;;;Ui"'~"'~j,,,.,u..il:-i~I~,;;J.,;;.,,~~L..i4-.Jl,,.1f,~,.'lliIfo,l..:, FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 713 Capital Improvement Projects 714 CIP - Fiscal Agent 715 Park Acquisition & Development 717 Resid. Construction/Conversion 725 Indust. Development Authority TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 713 Capital Improvement Projects 714 CIP - Fiscal Agent 715 Park Acquisition & Development 717 Resid. Construction/Conversion 725 Indust. Development Authority TOTAL REVENUES 1''';'';'I'l:l'!'w''''''('1n''--''''''''I'''''1!:;!r;'';;'",l'1't~'~'''';t;1"""'\;!11'1"""~-"'4 ";'!!.'t~;:;~;;'~;,~fla;fi:9.d~I:J~":":;fl~'!b.~riHI~'::: fBLQ);" J.!i.""'ll;r-'~"fr;l"r::,'w..~;, ''''I!'L'':'':'~ill,;.;::'m''''';'':l'flr",''''''lr, 10t:;.1f~!iLj;Ulill~~'QJd~ii1iJkJt1$;~~ i'i'Hb 377~'291'!11, ::i,!I'2'!'02S'!"0001; tL,~,...,~~_.......",.!.MJjjJ""'"Jl..,....'_"'''''''''',,,,~~ ~1':hI.: 6'3S:~87,""!"'-:;!i,r 679-:-242;,;' _'~"_"'~"_..w_"."~_,.J;.J'M',_,..,Jw._....,,-,..:.:....,,,,,..,,.<l,W 1;J!!r:;~,:ry7FiGT';.r;rM:3~6:ffm~j'i:>:ii! 'i "~,i',lW~,V,;~cm:J ~i;~:,:iil""c."J,L'd.,,~IH' "",. .ut! ,"w, "I.M;, JlHL",~,jhl", ".,"~, j $11,015,778 $2,704,242 t-'"_., ""C" ""'-"'~QI'''-~'''''''Ic'' 1'''''''''''''''1i ~:,;; '.;i"';Jl~,;';'!lJlj'i I!IiO!, 'f,"'h !.(~~;l It'I'\',lt'),'OJlj .)"""lIlL. ,;"" ,...~ib,-",wt"", ,;~1 "' }""M,~"",;"'b~",,,, '.......R,:,,"'""'.. [""';"'l""':"""!"i!;,;.':BI"lfI"'''''''''L",,'H'!N"V'''''J:'i':,:'''!f''~t':; ':,"'''':,'' !"i, W'lt-,; /h:,1",' .(<'OHil,'ll,j'<it' "L"~,I,j,,, ,o",{ '~I."J:JL~.!!J. CJ"~'w...2'~~li...lf,t;~... EbrJEd!IQ:Q'Q~QbO;~JWj!;n(;:j;'.;~i1!5'0J2~do)1j "-'-';""'''''2-0''0'' "'0"0"0"'::'.,c;mr-".ri-1"'O'00'''0-' h"''i,di,Iii;:: ..; 1I;1.;)if:i";'i~'if;!l,:,,'.. vi!;'1 ....,i".,-....____..~......_,.'_~L__~~,....~'........ ~jl~.;:[iEHEHiffii!~:I':9~W~jB!~~:;n;!;;fg~:1;;rrm~,QJ~ $1,200,000 $610,000 ~~'"''''''''1'''t'T....,~"..,t-'~''''''''''''''''''-'''~~:::1~'~T':m;<:I;,.'~"?1'''t~~''''''''--''''''''''''-w~rr:,.~-'.'''-'-' '~'-""''''''-~'t''''~''''''''=--''":'~'-'''''rr-:r"""'"''"''='~a~-'~'''''\fj NE:r"FUND:,A<;:tIVlrv':":"."i':';;"".;":'i,l';t,;.:'"';" )i'/($4,988,5~1) ':;, , '($2:017;455)',,,; ,,($9,~15;778)!, :'($?,094,242), L,t;-" Hilllj'"",,<lIl-"..,,; :;;'"."~,,,,.;"IL:, ,""I"I":;",,.~I,I"""""'lk;;,:,,~It;;;"""lii' "",:,J..",,,, L.""im,J.,,^;',lil,~<,,"'''''''I'~' ",~;;,;;,.,.;~,hh;,,,,,:.,...,,,,;,,,,~u.;,,,,,,;,,;j(U;. '" ,~I_,;,,-,';,.l<;", ",U"il-"":,.""u~u."......,."",,,..,#, ,', ,~..l"c'" 'MI....,,,, ..r""" I~ ,gtHER TRANSI?OR1\A1fI.dN .P,jU}GRAMS' :FUN():;::~' ":, /'3.0. ; ... - --.... - , I ::.---- "'= .~:..: _ '_ ~ 'f~_ _~"_' - ~~. Jo. "l.:._ . _ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Revenue from Other Agencies Other Revenue Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 134,619 220.929 1,731 2,470.155 $2,827,434 415,642 2,131,919 67,952 o $2,615,513 o o 429,726 406.589 $836,315 115,623 4,292,540 2,769 o $4,410,932 "'U""'-r--'!~"''''1'''''~j$'''- '-,'''",;m:'I'i''''If:'-''''''r'''''''!::1'''-g j!,!:{-:q;'ii:^'::::: il;';';').' 'Ii:_ 0 il': . ;':li"1;;h'~'";"i;<\iIN:';_;:'H( 0 'i,: t.......:_':.lu...i:.u;." ."",,,.>}l,,,-'_..-4tI..:..'.,,L.,iJh~t!'Ull.Jl.,.t... "l0mw:'r"::-::~:"T,";~lt-:'-O~jrr 1'11r,.,,";r:;li"::;::C:W,I'w:"r:-~ fill"-' ,,'Lid"':" 'j11<,):!I;!,),,, .101 c: ::;P:II'/<'dt" ;;::, ~,,<,,;,'il' 0 >.. ~ .ljJ;;..~ .i~,:~...It;J~j~_.:a~~,,;;,..;'...,,;jWIJJjQ k~ ........:::o.ij r;:~!',;I~':::!'qr:;Fir1if'I:;:;i69~1'18;;;n)1!f40iTf6cF?l lillw~_ (..t..".,J.;u,~:!,:,!i';..._.,.~l'" :"dj~d,,'~' I ~",~....,'.,...;"">.,,,,d [;!4 ,'8'~8ii4~6~:r.';r:;'T7,689:86i11 ~I~:, .."!,..;...,.....,...,..,,.t..., _'''~' .." ~,,~ ,'.'riliJk~.,;.,. ".,~"...,l..,""....:"......,'" $8,884,899 $9,091,861 ~83;lI)t,:~~I!;imll'r1i!;;,Oi\jl-<,,;t'k:!iIILlr]1~;~'m:iif60' Ja.."..,...J.t.-,-:,.::!ll";.,."","",.,,,_,...J"'''<<'i',,,,,,, ,,":!,,..,,...,...,..~,il...,,.mj ~--'~----:-r~I~~v-"~~n ~t.' 1.1,gg1 ,~~8Ji':II",d ~&0:Z;',<q~,1il 1"W~""""""~""'1i ,,"'''" "1""'''''''''' ["'-""""""-"'-j .' I,.:J~.'\ ,\;111i,;!t;;";';.'I'i:.'Of {~m;fi ;'," r",;,""~7!!;id 0;1'1 .<!,'""d,lllO'. "., ~W,..,.,ItJ,I""",''''l~' :,. .1.".".. ,~l .",..,.,111.....;; ",L. .", f"tt',"l!111~""l~~lr'I(I"'.... '-''\'f. ~~lI"""'.."!""l'I'.'r::l!.~.--.~<11 UI','''~:,..;'I,:,:;I,',:;i'.,;'h~,l'i/'J 0 ""g:!-4:'i-r\I'~ ~;i;1 :'1 ;'42 911t , ...,:".,l~:"", _,;l!!;....,;~.,"l,;..."..I1,l..,",I,#t, '!..', :llM",~jJ",..__......""",,, ,,:~, $14,001,588 $9,678,490 rN-.'t,--ET>F..-U"..,.,......NDTA~C: .T...~IV."'..I-T'~Y.'~}ilr:frj~I;w~,,,,,1,~I~~li~i;;:!1F%;;j.~;7f(.,'$.~2"1?-,92~1. i...)iF1.~$~-3~5"~74..,~6-.'1.~7..~;Il!/0....$~5i....1'1~6. ~6 8-'':19'' _',r:;q;,:;~i?$-5.'''''''8"6'''1r6".....2-9~ I.. " ." .....';:..h",., .,,', I .,.,,' . ,.',,;,,;1 .'n1"I<".::'dl'j)'wJIHI;.;ii;'"rk:.-;.)hl'-<:-;;:'.A:.-;....:"1.!1':-:"" ...,' :il.,,, .., 1""""'''''''' ""I .,... ". , , ,'".' .......'It i",::... ,.. ", ;.~. ...." ..... ,;jiL.....,."rk',,:I;... '. ,.,,'. , ,'" ....',,~ J"'~, ..u...,,,,;l!<,.,,.l/.lI",..';,'m"'....,'IIW.1,,,,,,.... If;. ,:.I~.,j"._ I",; ,.,,;.... ~"<,lll".;,,,;,lJ.I,," ..,~"';.jjU",!,"-."""l.'-'.,.~,WUl;"i~<1~j"....I"'...w...di". ,~...."':.__",,"~ ..Jk ,.,'......,"""lllo;'1"',.",~illm"......."",'J..__.~.,...l,"',"i<I.~i"..-..;lW,',;.. FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 723 Bicycle Facilities 735 Transportation Partnership 736 Other Transportation Program 737 Trans Equity Act - 21 738 Cal Trans STIP 739 Traffic Congestion Relief Fund 741 Prop 1 B Hwy Safety TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 723 Bicycle Facilities 735 Transportation Partnership 736 Other Transportation Program 737 Trans Equity Act - 21 738 Cal Trans STIP 739 Traffic Congestion Relief Fund 741 Prop 1 B Hwy Safety TOTAL REVENUES 289,499 309.028 120,825 o o 2,108,082 o $2,827,434 68,571 10,983 244,457 52,739 9,295 2,229,468 o $2,615,513 50.926 4,910 256,315 o o 523.063 1,101 $836,315 50,926 612 277,077 o 1,075 390,184 3.691.058 $4,410,932 ""^''''?''t-_''11r-:,~m~~F:j'' "m!,!: IV"'-J'''i 'i''f''~''''''~:' M_'_'''''') ,,,Ij, ;<f, ,r",' ,,#,1 i"l'i'~ 0:1 ;WI,;..4r--'I, 266 ,-220 FI Le,," d... "",.L"j,J," """.5 ',_.'" ,"",,"",,_," ""'''''"""""' [1;}1:'!!i'~,;,:rttr'tt~e~'69'J;I;:);i~;il;~~;I:;~ii.iqF!:;1.i~!bi'!l; "..;.J..IW'ilf,..~.l'I~il"~",,,.,,<J~ ;::',,,~~I, .".~~.~I,I..jll'.H,,;L,Ci,.:;~ Iii ;;;;:'7; i"90:'830;i;;:,ir.r," 5;"09""2 :234'~ 1~..*.Wit".. -.....~...-'A"'._.~m:::....!u.. ~.._.-...___,.....I~IJ:J l!l'W:~:;:;lW:,,:...'''.....7~...'''n.''~,i''!:;'n:!t!I~1H:.m:[.';';~II"' ,1I' r'''' '1""215"0001',1,,,," '"'" :;:';",':1':" 1"',0','l "',....J~.J,j".............,_:::.:.;u~,IW",.., ." '>'''''''''1'''''''''''' mt";"'li....,~.,~,. "......,' "1''''''m''''''''II'''~''~''- ~ ""I ',....,'..'"...,. ..-'....., ''''''01 '1"11 t..-'....".I I""""" ('-......"0.'" r;~J1.;l)I,!jjl:F,:~~iJ;a'..%,ii!i]lliB;!,'!iU:';k~ J~ii:7!mr;29 79';i50"OJ'!lmn:r;':mm/G48T5oo'iJ1 l!L..,.,_jl.l<,___..~ ........,_...1 =_1Jj,..__" l~...,.__,__~."...l. ,.,r:i""-;-791i;r~'no-" 7;7''''3"" ""385 '4"-Ofj'", lH:....,"I",....''''''I'''..''''II,..., I";I/.,,.,l....... . , .~L'.;di4i;;;l;-llil.;;.':;:,I,f.L;;~.,:.Jll.i ,;.;l~~,I!iL.,'" '.~..."...,! ~.. "..."Jil;; $8,884,899 $9,091,861 ri;::r~;~i'""141"319: :1'~,r'''''T:J'267, 6"49"":1 ~,~:,.-;)~..:;;;;i,~lr~ .~.. '~..l'":~..ll.I;,i:!.....IJ'i1'-1'""-, ........,,' "..,~..,,";.':!; l;::<:~.;I', ;;8'-)1 ;'!~f~:iJ'P';ro'1! 1,\.I!ril,V,I~'~I"'ffmq:i-~f::::~O)Q l~H'; "..."",,,,,,::!J'J,",bv';,,.;; ."J~ ';.';;!ilu",." tl.d,.,m"lh"",h.~..", ;,1 r""'l'~'8;982T50o;:1(i'j9f"""5'i6"'i7;:434": ~k:, ,,,,.J~,,. . . "_"",,..... ."", " .",,;l.! .>:.1.:':,'--.....", ..,,,,j;.~. .....-"..d",,:tli [""'"''"'1'"""" """""' """"""" "'''1"""'1."0"'''''"1''""11'''' "",'"""'", ~i,.:~:,'LI:L?J.,2.',Q,9._Q1,,:ii!;I~;i;1;tl;;;;~Uff.'!ri~;9rkt E~~'~i:~~'iL'!:~.;~'~~':'ij3l5J~Q~;2 ~~;~~~C;~;#~~r~i:1IQjl r::" 1'1:1', 0"00;'0015:;': ::';1'~,,:~::348: 06'61 LL.__...._ -,,'.._'_ .....~......j..lt-'-._'--'."'___.........~ !"I "'""3"""'6""6"2'7""6"""9".'" """""1"""3"'3""8""5""""'4. "0" ,7~9 La:~:~....;.,,_;':"',....;:iiL.~~:~,.,_~...;. .:;,: $14,001,588 $9,678,490 'C';':"""""'~j''''''' ',,~,,~,''-'' ""'r.'"'''''''''' """m'''''j~lt !l")":I.':--:..~ltr.l!."'Tr"".'T'.Tr:'~...~:. ;;.-milr",.t "I"""'-"-'-'''"~'''~'''''~''c'''''ltr''. -::.'!^.",',.,,,,.,.'''''7'''''~.-..~'''''';;'~tm:,.''i-'-''.,.-'fr''ll'''''4~1':'''''' "!~f""TImi:n'-'''"'''''"''''':'-:'~t''''''--'~CJ: "NET:I:'"UNQ ACTIVITY: '"'""1)',11:" :;'1.1".,"/:'; i', ;';"::;":'"'","1:($211,921).;' ,'"I $3',574:617,:i;:,I." ;$5;116:689'!::,"I,:, ; :$586,62fuj "'t,.".."...!,lli~'L>fll,..J~I;...."...{;."J,.._.d'....:i~.....M.I.....:;.J:Su!,..n.~"'""'""-a.jfu"".-,c-,,,-..;..I;,,",,,,,,,,,,__,,,_L..; .._.~,1.,.1.-_",,,",,,,,,,-,_......_~.;J,.oL..jL...,,......,,.., ''''<i",."l'H'_~"_.. _l._,Ul."._it;cl,~, ""141"" r' I c~ c', ~' I,ll If Cc ",1];, ~'I/.&1i" Iv ' ~i!Ii'" ,cr~, ',;". c~ i J u~ril. ~, "'" , ",'M'" "tr<,""" ~; c, t(, 'c II IV' (,(C"~~J , c c cc Cc ,!I- ,,,,.1.., hi . ...,. it ~" ~ ~1J:!l\~ 'i'~ivc.I'f i!~~N 'fj , ",i~'" ,~r~"J <i ,~ ~- '~-' ,1!~"'M "ill -142- 'n ,~ if , 'ifll.,'\' ,1 ~t:" A~ w.". I,.;l..,,,,a.' -';-......f..,..,. r. ..... ",r. I', '... 'j:' '~" (:,,;;,. ". '''''''''')Ji!!i ~!, . ',f ';1 /,. 11" '"' .il"...,!<' " ",...,";'.) <1""'1' ,.~u,: ~, 'J '" '"I'~iV :' ."1", "I I':' I:',. ':\' "'''" I!',j '~....''.i ,1L> w....r'i1,j JW,I ~tl '1\ PROPOSED BUDGET DEBT SERVICE fUNDS -143- DEBT SERVICE FUNDS The debt service requirement for the City and the Redevelopment Agency is $17.9 million for fiscal year 2009-10. This represents an increase of approximately $600,000 from the fiscal year 2008- 09 amended budget of $17.3 million. Debt service payments are made from various City and Agency Funds in accordance with the legal documents governing each borrowing. Present debt is in the form of Certificates of Participation, Pension Obligation Bonds, long Term Notes, lease-Purchase Obligations, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, and Tax Allocation Bonds. Debt has been issued by the City to finance a wide variety of projects, including the construction of the new Public Works Center and the new Police Facility, parking facilities, refurbishment of the Chula Vista Shopping Mall, property acquisitions, building remodeling, and equipment and software acquisition. Annual debt service costs are borne primarily by the General Fund, with the exception of the Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds and the Tax Allocation Bonds, which are funded by property tax increment revenues in the Redevelopment Agency. To follow is a brief description of the debt service funds. Fund 441 -1994 Pension Obliqation Bonds The 1994 Pension Obligation Bonds in the amount of $16,786,532 were issued. to provide funds to pay - . - . the City's unfunded liability in the California Public Employees Retirement System. The bonds are a debt of the City General Fund and the City is obligated by Retirement law to make the bond payments without specification of funds. The term of the bonds is through fiscal year 2011-12. -145- Fund 442 - CDBG Section 108 Loan In June of 2007, the City received a loan of $9.5 million from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), under the Section 108 program. These funds will be repaid with a portion of the City's annual CDBG allocation, over the next 20 years. The funds will be used for the 'Castle Park Infrastructure Project'. The Section 108 loan is an 'advance' of future CDBG entitlement funds, and, as such, is repaid with a portion of the City's annual entitlement. Fund 446 - Notes Pavable Adamo A January 1994 note payable for $370,000 to Mr. and Mrs. Adamo as part of the purchase price for property located adjacent to the Civic Center. The term of the note is twenty years. Fund 448 - 2000 Certificates of Participation Series A This Certificate of Participation Series A of 2000 in the amount of $25,255,000. Certificates were issued to provide funds to improve the City's 800 MHZ emergency communication system and to construct and improve the City's Corporation Yard. The term of the Certificates is through the year 2020 Fund 449 - San Dieqo Countv Reqional Communication Systems On March 7, 2000, the Chula Vista City Council authorized the City to join the San Diego County Regional Communications Systems (RCS). The City's portion of the infrastructure is $2,809,405 plus financing costs. This is payable over a period of 14 years commencing on January 1, 2001 through January 1, 2014. Fund 450 - 2002 Certificates of Participation - Police Facility Proiect In June 2002, the Public Financing Authority issued the 2002 COP in the amount of $60,145,000 to finance the construction of the City's new Police Headquarters. The source of repayment of the certificates is the lease payments to be made by the General Fund and PFDIF to the Public Financing Authority. The term of the certificates is through the year 2032. Fund 451 - Lonq Term Advances DSF - City This fund was established to account for inter fund loans. Fund 452 - Capital Leases - Fire Equipment This fund was established to account for the lease/purchase of the Fire Department's equipment. -146- . _"'--_L' ~ ~ ~... ,-- )~~--:-: tJill' = 1 ~,-,"",,; - ,- :; -^ . -:- -.' "~:, ~ - - '. - , '''r;:; < ,- '. -:; - ~... p . it":;... ^- .-;-1 ~,,;c>'S":;o: \G;I:1F~JFc!w)'N@" , :,",; , ':._~ ~;~,',~, 'i'.. ~', :~. '--, }, :-. "4~4f))' _ _~ "'-,......-___...,.-'...;;...J;.......~~_ _"'-'- ~_9.. ,,-...__t~~_ ~___"" _ ..__ h:JtflJ:.:..___.. _M~':" ~J!_..., . 1 -:.. FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services 2,475 2,475 Other Expenses 3,203,341 3,344,377 Transfers Out 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,205,816 $3,346,852 $9,062,247 $9,553,722 REVENUES Use of Money & Property 60 8 Transfers In 2,724,679 3,855,348 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $2,724,739 $3,855,356 $3,862,247 $9,561,256 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 441 1994 Pension Obligation Bond 2,272,435 2,371,755 442 COBG Section 108 Loan 0 0 446 Notes Payable Adamo Property 44,030 45,351 449 SO Co Regional Comm Systems 295,734 295,734 451 Long-term Advances OSF - City 593,617 634,012 452 KS Fire Equipment Capital Lease 0 0 453 CES Loan Repayment 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,205,816 $3,346,852 $9,062,247 $9,553,722 REVENUES 441 1994 Pension Obligation Bond 2,272,515 2,371,725 442 COBG Section 108 Loan 0 0 446 Notes Payable Adamo Property 44,030 45,351 449 SO Co Regional Comm Systems 295,739 295,742 451 Long-term Advances OSF - City 112,455 1,142,538 452 KS Fire Equipment Capital Lease 0 0 453 CES Loan Repayment 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES $2,724,739 $3,855,356 $3,862,247 $9,561,256 -148- FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services 17,679 18,650 Other Expenses 10,694,160 11,925,586 Transfers Out 0 1,102,129 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $10,711,839 $13,046,365 $10,541,047 $10,528,350 REVENUES Use of Money & Property 613,854 579,477 Transfers In 9,500,218 9,904,895 ESTIMA TED TOTAL REVENUES $10,114,072 $10,484,372 $10,441,083 $10,412,178 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 448 2000 COP Ser A-Fin Project 450 2002 COP Police Facility Proj 471 2003 Refunding Cert of Part 472 2004 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase I 473 2006 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase 2 TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 448 2000 COP Ser A-Fin Project 450 2002 COP Police Facility Proj 471 2003 Refunding Cert of Part 472 2004 COP Civ elr Proj Phase I 473 2006 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase 2 TOTAL REVENUES 2,124,500 3,913,746 1,468,901 2,399,965 804,727 $10,711,839 2,190,904 4,034,827 1,480,436 2,366,413 41,492 $10,114,072 -149- 2,125,672 5,948,220 1,300,375 2,394,402 1,277,696 $13,046,365 2,061,767 3,916,299 1,353,417 2,266,773 886,116 $10,484,372 $10,541,047 $10,528,350 $10,441,083 $10,412,178 -150- p o G E T R OTHER p o s D E fUNDS -151- B u D OTHER FUNDS The funds included in this section include miscellaneous Special Revenue and Internal Service funds. Special Revenue Funds are used to account for proceeds derived from specific revenue sources, which are legally restricted to expenditures for special purposes. Internal Service Funds are used to finance and account for goods, special activities, and services performed by one City department for other City departments on a cost reimbursement basis. Internal Service Funds account for the activities of centralized vehicle and equipment maintenance, worker's compensation, insurance, and technology replacement. To follow is a brief description of special revenue funds. TRANSPORTATION FUNDS Included in this group are the following funds: Fund 221 - Gas Tax This fund accounts for the receipt and expenditure of all monies received from the State under Street and Highway Code Sections 2106, 2107, 2107.5. The allocations must be spent for street maintenance or construction and a limited amount for engineering. Historically, these monies were deemed highly restrictive insofar as expenditure, but with adoption of AS 1502 effective January 1, 1978 most of the money can be used for any street purpose. In the past the total revenue received has been expended on a 50-50 basis, i.e. about one-half of the money for road construction and the other half for maintenance. While such a policy is desirable, greater utilization of the fund for street maintenance and other street related operation costs is possible. -153- Fund 225 - Traffic Siqnal Fee This fund accounts for the receipt and expenditure of fees collected from private developers for financing and / or installation of new traffic signals, as required by City of Chula Vista Council Policy 478-01 Fund 227 - Transportation Sales Tax This fund was established to account for the receipt and disbursement of all transportation sales tax (TransNet) revenues for the City. In November 1987, San Diego County voters first approved the Transportation Program (TransNet). In November of 2004, voters approved a 40-year extension of the program, which funds transportation improvements throughout the region via a half-cent local sales tax. The City's allocation of regional funds is based upon population and the number of local street and road miles maintained by the City. PARKING FUNDS Included as part of this group are the following funds: Fund 241 - Parkinq Meter Parking Meter Fund revenues are generated through two sources: coin deposits from parking meters located in the downtown area, and parking citation payments for expired meter violations. These funds pay for the coin collection and maintenance of the meters, the parking enforcement staff that monitors the downtown area, and general upkeep and signage of the downtown parking Jots. Fund 243 - Town Centre I Parkinq This fund is used to account for revenues from an in-lieu parking fee. This in-lieu parking fee applies to any developer of a new commercial building or addition to an existing commercial building within the Downtown Parking District. Use of monies in this fund is restricted to the purchase or development of parking sites. -154- PUBLIC SAFETY FUNDS Included in this group are the following funds. Fund 245 - Traffic Safety This fund is a depository for all monies derived from vehicle code fines, excluding parking violations. The fines are collected through the County court system and remitted to the City monthly. These monies may be expended only for traffic control devices and equipment and maintenance thereof or for the maintenance, improvement or construction of public streets. Fund 251 - Supplemental Law Enforcement Services This fund accounts for the Supplemental Law Enforcement grant funds awarded to the Police Department; these funds can be used to supplement general fund appropriations for Police related personnel, overtime, and equipment expenditures. Fund 252 - Police Department Grants This fund includes the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) and miscellaneous police grants. CBAG is funded with federal funds. While CBAG employees are technically City of Chula Vista employees they do not work in the City of Chula Vista nor do they provide direct services for the City of Chula Vista; the City serves only as a fiscal agent for CBAG. Fund 253 - Inmate Welfare Fund This fund is a depository for monies collected from pay phones commissions and operation of a commissary, in accordance with the Sheriffs Penal Code section 4025. Monies in this fund shall be expended for the benefit, education, and welfare of the inmates. Fund 254 - Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds This fund accounts for federal Justice Assistance Grant funds awarded to the Police Department; these funds can be used to supplement general fund appropriations for Police related personnel, overtime, and equipment expenditures. Fund 256 - Asset Seizure This fund is a depository for assets seized under Federal statutes through the process of "equitable sharing" of drug money and real property. By law these funds may only be used for law enforcement purposes and are intended to supplement, not supplant, existing funds -155- L1SRARy/CUL TURAL ARTS FUNDS Included in this group are the following funds: Fund 261 - California Librarv Service Act The California Library Services Act (CLSA) helps public libraries provide coordinated reference services and provides reimbursement for interlibrary loans of materials and loans to nonresident borrowers through the Transaction Based Reimbursement program, also known as the Direct Loan program. The Chula Vista Public Library participates in the Universal Borrowing provision of CLSA that reimburses the City for any over-the-counter loan service to the residents of all other California public library jurisdictions (Direct Loan). The Interlibrary Loan program reimburses the City for handling costs when books are lent to other California libraries. Fund 262 - Public Librarv Foundation Fund The Public Library Foundation Act (PLF) is a funding formula under which the State contributes funding for basic local library services, under specified conditions, to assure the availability to every resident of the state an adequate level of public library service regardless of the taxable wealth of the local jurisdiction providing the service. The legislation provides that to every library jurisdiction which allocates to its public library at least as much local funding as it had the previous year, the state will award a dollar amount equal to the proportional share of the total amount allocated for the Public Library Foundation program based on the population of the library's service area as certified by the State Librarian for that fiscal year. The annual funding is dependent upon appropriations made by the legislature and the Governor. Fund 267 - McCandliss Awards The Gayle McCandliss Fund was established in 1991 shortly after she passed away Consistent with her wishes, it was established as a perpetual fund to recognize and provide monetary support or recognition to individuals or groups who make substantial contribution to the arts in the City of Chula Vista. -156- SUNDRY GRANT FUNDS Included as part of this group are the following funds Fund 268 - State Recreation Grants This fund was established to account for the receipt and disbursement of all State Recreation Grants received by the City. Fund 272 - Federal Grants Fund This fund was established to account for the receipt and disbursement of all Federal Grants received by the City. Fund 273 - State Grants Fund This fund was established to account for the receipt and disbursement of all State Grants received by the City (excluding Recreation related grants). ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND CONSERVATION FUNDS Included as part of this group are the following funds: Fund 281 - Waste Manaqement and Recvclinq Revenue for the Waste Management fund is generated by a variety of grants which are used to implement, operate and educate the public on waste diversion, recycling, environmental actions and impacts. Current grant programs include litter reduction and bottle and can recycling programs; a regional used motor oil and oil filter recycling program; regional household hazardous waste program, regional universal waste program, and a regional needles and sharps disposal program. Fund 282 - Environmental Services The Environmental Services fund is a depository for revenue that is generated primarily by a 5% surcharge (AB 9~9 fees) applied to the refuse rates for residential and commercial customers. The surcharge is authorized by the State to recover the costs of developing and implementing source reduction, recycling, and composting programs that are implemented to meet the State mandate to divert 50% of all waste generated annually in the City from landfills. The fund also includes two annual flat fees paid by the franchise hauler under the -157- franchise agreement to cover litter container costs and to support the programs public education and enforcement service costs. Fund 285 - Enerqy Conservation Fund Revenue for the Energy Conservation fund is generated by grants and inter-agency agreements for specific energy conservation projects. For fiscal year 2008-2009, the energy conservation fund reflects the budget for the SDG&E energy conservation grant. This grant funds energy conservation programs for local residents, businesses, and City operations that reduce the amount of natural gas and electricity consumed. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS These funds are depositories of grant entitlement monies received from the Department of Housing and Urban Development including funds 311, 312, 314, 321, 323, and 325. The purpose of these monies is for community development projects; eligible activities include those that: Benefit low and moderate income people. Eliminate slums and blight. Alleviate conditions posing a serious health and/or safety hazard. OPEN SPACE DISTRICT FUNDS These funds are a depository for all monies received for all flat rate property tax assessments levied against benefiting property owners for all maintenance of open space areas. Included in this group are funds 342 through 389. The total assessment amount for each Open Space District is calculated each year based upon the cost of providing services within the district. This assessment rate is limited to the prior year's amount, increased by the lesser of two local indexes. In recent years the indexed increases were not effectively keeping pace with the actual costs of providing these services to the property owners. In fiscal year 2007-08 staff went through the Proposition 218 process on seven districts/zones, in order to bring revenues in line with actual maintenance costs. Only one of the seven districts was approved for an increase in assessment. As a result a concentrated effort has been made to reduce expenditures to within available resources. -158- STORM DRAIN FUND Fund 301 - Storm Drain Revenue Storm Drain Revenue Fund is a depository for all monies collected from the monthly storm drain service charge, in accordance with Chapter 14.16 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Monies in this fund may be used for storm drain purposes. To follow is a brief description of the internal service funds. Fund 231 - Workers Compensation This fund is a depository for contributions made from the General Fund to pay for annual costs related to workers' compensation liabilities including the provision of an appropriate reserve to pay uninsured claims costs. The City is self-insured for amounts up to $1.0 million per claim. The amount of the reserve and the required annual transfer is determined by the Director of Finance, based on experience and consultation with the Risk Manager. Fund 341 Public Liability Trust Fund This fund is a depository for contributions made from the General Fund to provide an appropriate reserve level to pay for uninsured and deductibles for public liability losses. The City is self-insured for amounts up to $250,000 per claim. Fund 232 Flexible SpendinQ Account This fund is used to account for employee health, medical, and dependent care benefits. Fund 393 TechnoloQY Replacement Fund The Technology Replacement Fund is an internal service function that provides for the replacement of computers and related technology equipment. Funds from departments' operating budgets are transferred to the Technology Replacement Fund for future replacement of equipment included in the program. Due to economic reasons, the program will not be funded in fiscal year 2009-10 and the remaining fund balance will be transferred to the General Fund. -159- -160- ;-..':".......-\-~..~I'."'~..,::"O:l_r--:--~_-.I_ 'l;-~'-' -'l-;'~":-~ ,- f ;'-.:~,"~', ~=--~.~';~--'l l~lIPR:~I\i\I.~P~~tf~i{lIOIN,.F.:ij'I~HP,~.'. .' :.; ~"." '--:: <" ~ ...-"0..' .';22'{['^j FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Other Expenses 95,888 50,630 Transfers Out 4,176,440 3,845,436 CIP Project Expenditures 4,152,682 9,491,394 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $8,425,010 $13,387,460 $8,411,992 $16,864,504 REVENUES Other Local Taxes 3,210,000 9,171,000 Use of Money & Property 875,065 1,082,504 Revenue from Other Agencies 4,143,108 4,275,361 Charges for Services 683,742 499,457 Other Revenue 11,517 1,351 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $8,923,432 $15,029,673 $9,270,957 $15,820,371 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 221 Gas Tax 4,972,162 3,960,816 222 Federal Aid to Urban 0 0 225 Traffic Signal 1,138,015 526,367 226 CMAQlTraffic Signal 0 0 227 Transportation Sales Tax 2,314,833 8,900,277 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $8,425,010 $13,387,460 $8,411,992 $16,864,504 REVENUES 221 Gas Tax 4,115,294 4,038,599 222 Federal Aid to Urban 0 0 225 Traffic Signal 962,199 935,592 226 CMAQ/Traffic Signal 105 0 227 Transportation Sales Tax 3,845,834 10,055,482 TOTAL REVENUES $8,923,432 $15,029,673 $9,270,957 $15,820,371 .161. \'<-,~I?~R1~lti~J"~i'I~101Sl~<---";: .-:>.- -.:~~--~ ;':",l~" ','~~,,-i:- <2r470:'1 .~.) -.:__-~__:..-.L..::...'.~_ ~--~--~..._~-- --_~ _~~~_,_",,,,___ ;..:_ ~....;__.. _ "-_ _'A: _I FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services 18,938 25,649 Supplies and Services 17,079 18,032 Other Expenses 266,725 270,704 Utilities 16,697 16,425 Transfers Out 2,264 1,358 CIP Project Expenditures 0 168 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $321,703 $332,336 $566,276 $539,731 REVENUES Licenses and Permits 24,729 23,209 Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties 60,047 73,339 Use of Money & Property 246,909 249,662 Other Revenue 0 16,160 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $331,685 $362,370 $361,772 $568,126 -. EXPENDITURES 241 Parking Meter 243 Town Centre I-Parking District TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 241 Parking Meter 243 Town Centre I-Parking District TOTAL REVENUES 321,703 o $321,703 332,168 168 $332,336 330,336 1,349 $331,685 344,338 18,032 $362,370 -162- FUND DETAIL $566,276 $539,731 $361,772 $568,126 F';:'p--~-"'iR~1i~"-I'~- ~> :-'-IF'~IU" I~- "f)--;~z,- -.' .. ',~" ~ ~ ,b",. ,,' ~f' ': .l-- -~'.;'. :; -~: - :y,~ . ~ :':4.2c-.~rQ-C:-~~ 1.....1 1 '~I ,I ' ., I :l~.;>"".. >',. . V" ~,~ t ~ ~' , . t , ~ It... . . " .... ~ '" ""~, v""" 0 . . ,...".,~\ .. ,,~ '- , .. -,.-_.: ,'7'>.-.... ,~-"-_ .1 , -~--".;; . ~ ~""".~~-~. __ .~- ___ ___~~ ~ -....... "'",'''_.....* .....'- :;;'_-E: STAFFING SUMMARY - 241 ,163- "j.t\@!j~i~J ~$~l~trr'~:;~l~~~~ ',:~ ~~ij.:.-~' ....~ ~ '. >:'. .:~ '_. ~,n', :;.~~)5',0U FUND SUMtv1ARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services 3,407 2,178,126 Supplies and Services 102,725 193,364 Other Expenses 3,913 425,878 Capital 49,654 64,215 Transfers Out 866,885 673,134 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,026,584 $3,534,717 $5,458,196 $4,330,902 REVENUES Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties 842,214 1,056,790 Use of Money & Property 36,079 71,684 Revenue from Other Agencies 426,010 3,132,638 Other Revenue 100,000 0 Transfers In 0 0 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $1,404,303 $4,261,112 $5,409,337 $4,510,845 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 245 Traffic Safety 251 Suppllaw Enforcement Services 252 Police Department Grants 253 Inmate Welfare Fund 254 local law Enf Block Grant 256 Asset Seizure TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 245 Traffic Safety 251 Suppllaw Enforcement Services 252 Police Department Grants 253 Inmate Welfare Fund 254 local law Enf Block Grant 256 Asset Seizure TOTAL REVENUES 513,600 o 93,725 o 65,974 353,285 $1,026,584 850,150 22,839 192,975 o 101,467 236,872 $1,404,303 597,402 425,574 2,255,516 o 117,235 138,990 $3,534,717 1,087,362 471,215 2,191,828 o 89,974 420,733 $4,261,112 $5,458,196 $4,330,902 $5,409,337 $4,510,845 .164. rn q~ -. --, ': ---.zc -, c, '-~ --:',-'. -. ~--.-- - - -- ---'" - '. _n - - ',.;' - - v-a r ~ ';P',l.J.B;blI'€~ Si\ilH;iEr':lFi~J~iJ!I2):" -', ' . ',:. ""'" ' ','~' 'I. - ", '-'t:: : ~5{(i)1 .,..__t :-r""'__"-_'1:..::_--.::.~~_"-=--.:L=___"'l...,,,..z. ~ ~_...:......~~...:.:...~_" ~ ~ __ ._~.!- ... ",u.._->-- __ _,,)1:':....-----2.=.'-1 _ STAFFING SUtvllv\ARY - 2,52 CBAG Administrative Analyst II CBAG Analyst CBAG Budget Manager CBAG Deputy Executive Director CBAG Director of SD LECC CBAG Executive Assistant CBAG Executive Director CBAG Graphic Designer/Webmaster CBAG Lead Programmer Analyst CBAG Management Assistant CBAG Meth Strike Force Coordinator CBAG Micro Computer Specialist CBAG Network Administrator 1111 CBAG Network Manager CBAG Program Analyst CBAG Program Manager CBAG RCFL Network Engineer Peace Officer Police Community Relations Specialist Police Training and Development Supervisor Public Information Officer (PD) Public 1.00 3.00 100 1.00 100 1.00 100 100 1.00 100 (1.00) (100) 1.00 2.00 1.00 100 2.00 1.00 100 100 1.00 -165- , 't'BR~R~jtClti]tif"t.iRNlfiRTS i~liJN:D:" ':. 2'6:01"1 -" _ _ _ _ ~ ... . ~ :i[~.. __ _ _ _ _ _ ~ , FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services Supplies and Services Other Expenses Transfers Out CIP Project Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Revenue from Other Agencies Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 9,252 8,294 1,200 199,124 o $217 ,870 o 2,100 o 31,110 o $33,210 17,088 388,230 900 $406,218 22,049 91,215 o $113,264 I' "'1!'-, '~~:"'"ilr<:;f'llT~~''''''~'':l; "':"'~r""";'~"l:""~'~'l'?W'.':M:!1 .!<" -'J '~1; iI:,l;..ij.'" 0' "k,',! 'I ;".'1 i lifljlf" ". 0.' :'i~iU.,..Ili..ill,Jt".;;:.J_._ 14 :k""""".J_J1:1lL.iilJ1.,,!':....~ . i1:i7:f~~;!:]I~f'4;9~9~;;I'~~_i,~;~;rJooml:!~i;~Q.9jJ1 f1)!::;;!~:rjiD2~;i;~'6~p;~t1il!E,!;;..;:'~il~q~r?:QQJ~ ~mr25 ooQ;lF?~:~j,J1F25,OOO:~ ,..;:u.,.-,~.~,*lm1..,.~. "~.m''"'':''_.:jJ _, , -^',t;._~JilIu;;:.,,',_,__. ,. ,_"........."""" 8ijK:;::~t!f:Tg,?,;,:'~1~f:;;uU:,!;;CllJIQ,?I~i1ij~; $129,244 $129,244 ~;:;::~~~t:w~:;6.i;?W~~i~F;tt;j'>.;:,!!f'5Jil t,!,;; ,)..:,J~~;;.'t.m;'jI11....~;':! ,"'.. ,,:l-J~Ill,'IJiL.,&.;!I..!JI..Y,.it!1 Jji,!~:::,'~'i,],TI;~j~~4:;;,Q9:Q]!~iim!@r!!mmltb',$,1QQ:~i':r;: ~--"':-l"' r -_."-:]".=~'.",.I.'l1'''".. "-'J [,';~::~~~t!r;'l':;:;Lll J':'lhti ~ OO"j ~i"r,;;.' _i;:l:~~ll.'.'i(: 900 ;j' ,,>l<.=~ l;.'~L."........... ....,1_""1;i"'-'1_'...'1lt;;..,;,.....-...l $134,900 $105,900 ~..."""""'-"."~,,.-"""),!'7".........".."...''"If'":tMr;;0;~~':wwmr~;;~~I~'<<1~;,~!"'li,:;;;lr;-$>-""~~7':~'~""'$"""''''I~'''-'~T"';;:rJ''''''''~''''~!;;)T'-m-j''~)C''tf:i NElilF,UND,AC1JyrIY'j,,,I,:.j "',i"II'",,,,,,1!,.,, ':',').""1:"1' "",'.1, 18.8,,3481''''1''';' f,J'" 80,054, ,', ',,', "'11..,$5,656':""""11',,:,:,,($.2.3,344),' il.lj,"'4;"j"",L~"~''''"",,,,,"~'ii,,r:ld,,,.,,I,,;,,<,;I,~I.; :ilJ,j",.., .,..",fillil J;1>".""""lJuc:f,,,,,~,;;,,,... 1"1~"",,,,,,,'~,k.,,,.,,,lw ~""_""'A,~ti","lU"'-M,."L",lll...."...ll""",,_,~ \"'''''''''''__,,,,,~1i.l1,,,..1),,,,;, .1~.1,.;,~,;"",,,'1,,~i>i;l.l;,,,,,,,--,, FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 261 California Library Service Act 88,216 29,110 262 Public Library Act 128,454 2,000 265 CA Dept of Education Sect. 321 0 0 267 McCandliss Cultural Arts 1,200 2,100 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $217 ,.870 $33,210 REVENUES 261 California Library Service Act 272,320 112,653 262 Public Library Act 130,301 (188) 265 CA Dept of Education Sect. 321 1,875 0 267 McCandliss Cultural Arts 1,722 799 TOTAL REVENUES $406,218 $113,264 '::i:'-;-;":;:!~;~P1-:'''m^^':~6"4-'~''~~! P';)j;P":'1~f~' ,"" '~"'!~"""")~Ti:'!_ !..Lt.]',,-: 2~.~"",,.,, "1:11~,644," ~1n::r:~'J7'l?l!'f<f!:~cfPI:?,+.;~.t'i'~fP~i?f""'lrl~"",:r0'rn ~i!I;,;:;i .:j;;;J!;liHl!'!~:b1L~11,~"li. J'L:;;!jj;,ji"!;;i;:~:itbil~~,',,,;,:;f: f}"''''''i'I;Dr'm'"--,,--,,,,''''''~'~'''' - ''''^'''''''lli~r''i'~--';; '--;;',; r"w'''''' LJb:~;ill~i:~'i!gffJt~~9jjm1;~!~iJ!~'M~m~~I@:g~i; t,,,~.;r:;rn 1'60QllI"ll'" 'j' '11 60Q"l'l 1~,L:;:U~;~I!ilJ~L:,,,',,,,...,,~!/;H,:LI.,lll'li!;:tll:i);"!,,,,,,!,~Jli11 $129,244 $129,244 $134,900 $105,900 rNET':F'U'N'D~AC'TrI'\iffy~!rm:~i;t'I:),r;I;J;~!lWjl;;~tj::F9;F!!:!:~!i'\:r~F:'1,',~:i;"~"$'1"88;'348'!I~:~IK......_';,':;~;$"8"(i: .054\~i;I},:,:'~::;ijt'~'$5~'Er56:'i!r~':i;i:;~!~i1'~'$'23t"'3t4'4' !lI..I.Wl~i;liI.~W':jI;Jl.4~!;..;:A:~..;jI,u;J~J.;l! ",I t ,I ,,:;jIW~l<.;.~..~:~~..L")\ '''<>'1,,,;~~~~,,..,,,,",,,'jld!' :'~Aiit.LIIt<:<~",~j -166- - -.. ~- -It . ---~. -,--.. -..- - - ~- -,... -, - - -- 'tJ'-- -- ------:1 ' ~: ~S~tJ;~!~:R:M. r(]It'A.lShiliS, JEi(U11SI:ID' ' , ",';;, '. ~ .' ". :--' , '. ':" " 2'c~(}q ~~__ __o,_"::_~ - ~_~ __-3_ ... -.. - ~~_- ,~_ _-__ ___ \'_... _--'-~ .... ,_;:i _ ~~_<"'_ _'.. _, ~_ ___. FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services 0 145,684 Supplies and Services 143.801 180,895 Other Expenses 230,665 0 Capital 45,346 24.085 CIP Project Expenditures 975,547 761,373 Non-CIP Project Expenditures 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,395,359 $1,112,037 $385,807 $1,248,297 REVENUES Use of Money & Property (37) 0 Revenue from Other Agencies 454,093 1,580,342 Other Revenue 0 23,824 Transfers In 0 13,672 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $454,056 $1,617 ,838 $983,717 $1,388,297 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 268 State Recreation Grants 975,547 533,113 272 Federal Grants Fund 174,906 220,370 273 State Grants Fund 244,906 358,554 274 ARRA Fund 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,395,359 $1,112,037 $385,807 $1,248,297 REVENUES 268 State Recreation Grants 147,442 939,891 272 Federal Grants Fund 129,560 251,629 273 State Grants Fund 177,054 426,318 274 ARRA Fund 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES $454,056 $1,617,838 , $983,717 $1,388,297 , .167. ~~ ---",~- ,-,'~ -- \;:.1: -",,' - ~,. -' - ;~ '0 - ~ .' '~-" My -"4. '~--""-:<-f. -;--"J .,' ~,t)'NSiI?RM;4~I'O'lNl;f;ItJ:I'N;I};', :~',' . " ',,' :',":' . ;. :,.. '., 2;80~' -".i~....:-____ _~~ _ _1 _'-'<1.'"'_ _". ",,__.' J~ __~,_ ..:__ '~___.:..____ '_'~ .-:\ ~ ~_~,-.'{4' '_ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services 93.985 126,931 Supplies and Services 277,447 567,510 Other Expenses 15,559 302,748 Utilities 0 782 Transfers Out 0 0 CIP Project Expenditures 51.909 302,522 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $438,900 $1,300,493 $3,433,396 $2,028,733 REVENUES Use of Money & Property 1.387 0 Revenue from Other Agencies 167.536 1,244,507 Charges for Services 0 0 Other Revenue 0 5.029 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $168,923 $1,249,536 $3,438,427 $2,119,170 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 281 Waste Management & Recycling 225.291 295.672 282 Environmental Services Fund 0 0 285 Energy Conservation 213,609 1,004,821 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $438,900 $1,300,493 $3,433,396 $2,028,733 REVENUES 281 Waste Management & Recycling (42,697) 314,342 282 Environmental Services Fund 0 0 285 Energy Conservation 211,620 935.194 TOTAL REVENUES $168,923 $1,249,536 $3,438,427 $2,119,170 .168. : rt@NSERVA1f!IONiH:j'j~J;Dc ,-, - -.' '. 260' I - - - ~ - .. - ~ - - ~ - -~ -- - ~. - - ~ - ~""- STAFFING SUMMARY - 282 Environmental Services Program Manager Recycling Specialist 1/11 2.00 ~~~~~~,.. .. "U ;;. Q . -~. . .. It a a 0 ,+-:i-3*J$k;:';;"/,'('L:::;,'~':;H;;'!":i4:l~/ f I ,,-,.. .C'_ '""_,_",, .. .., ,'" ""',, _. .0." ..0._ "':__ .. ',.__' ';_'0' ....,_,.,. .... '.' ._ .0 ...__._.___+.~..__'i<t:__""",_..~""._,_.__.,_:;::_:_:_~'.3f.-_JJ!>-.-._:.'.__..._.:.:-'"" ...... .:.,." ......, 100 ...'.""''''''f'''....,~: ' "~"""--".-';hi'"HJ'iI<--\.-_-L_..._"'.".--"'-.-i~:-.r'".-,','j, I 'I" ,:':x.... '.),',:,:"';":':"':P'ii:"Jj;,_",."':,,':C,:.iH!tu,, i'_::',!f:g:V"':!':':o/~'7""" .. ..;.;,',\; '"" ..-.... ''''''/ ., ". i~ 'h'.;':;I,j1::9.P;:;:i::l 'f~"'':',-::~,~''''~'''''"~'- . ';';"'i!ii:,;"',"..9..9,p,,,,,!JH ':f~"_] >,;"'Z'j:{fl1"1'x_,, _ _ ,';i:,';< .169. ::i~m~~"17~~:!i~:i:~;;~,~~~~~~~~' ~.~ ~~/1' : ~.:~ ~ .: .~ j'~ ;'~_,_i~j~ l FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services 185,353 284,711 Other Expenses 0 0 Utilities 2,266 481 Transfers Out 311,837 269,801 CIP Project Expenditures 0 82,202 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $499,456 $637,195 $549,998 $548,118 REVENUES Licenses and Permits 115,163 47,303 Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties 9,300 21,700 Use of Money & Property (1,095) 1,268 Charges for Services 548,360 570,070 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $671,728 $640,341 $580,660 $525,000 .170. FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services 14,242 14,850 Other Expenses 467,205 1,447,829 Capital 0 0 Transfers Out 9,501 0 CIP Project Expenditures 1,288,716 2,296,347 Non-CIP Project Expenditures 772,753 926,415 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,552,417 $4,685,441 $4,443,842 $3,970,965 REVENUES Use of Money & Property 10,611 16,714 Revenue from Other Agencies 4,206,564 4,354,211 Other Revenue 1,053 9,508,942 Transfers In 304,534 0 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $4,522,762 $13,879,867 $4,676,546 $3,870,965 FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 311 COBG Housing Program 1,124 0 312 Job Hsg Sal Incentive Grt Prog 1,053 0 314 Emergency Shelter Grant Prog 86,318 87,833 321 Home Program 204,696 1,313,237 323 COSG Sec 108 Loan Fund 0 0 325 COSG Program - Income Projects 8,377 0 333 FY2000 Comm Oev Slock Grant 2,250,849 3,284,371 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,552,417 $4,685,441 $4,443,842 $3,970,965 REVENUES 311 COSG Housing Program 30,142 1,010 3,12 Job Hsg Ballncentive Grt Prog 9,190 0 314 Emergency Shelter Grant Prog 90,458 87,833 321 Home Program 2,289,126 1,325,882 323 COBG Sec 108 Loan Fund 0 0 325 COBG Program - Income Projects (1,322) 11,299 333 FY2000 Comm Oev Block Grant 2,105,168 12,453,843 TOTAL REVENUES $4,522,762 $13,879,867 $4,676,546 $3,870,965 .171. ~ > I(::OMM;i),E~/'BliaCK:tl)~~i:ts!f;ili!Nri '-;(' -- -- >,'~, '3,~,,~: 1 ~ -- -~ ~ - ....... - - - -,- --- - - -.. - - .~ - - -- - - -- - - - --" ..... r,''',......,,,...t-:. "'''.........-'''1::-..'1".,......",.,''..,.'''..... ''''::'''''''-r:;-:''11r '....,...W:w.'.;1~:'..,......,!lj "-:0- "'''-:-1''-' ,,..,,,-..' .-. -"T'~.-,-:; "-'" "IT-,..~..._"-,,,...~."!":~-..,>~~.o/.., .'- ," , '~''''''~r-:>''''.';o-:-'' '''<1'-,,...= ".- E '~ET:FUND)~:CTl\I,IT.Y,m:: :"', Ii,: ":Ii{,::!:,.j~:,:,, IV "'1.$1',970,345 ":i'.:,$9:19~A26 ': I,',.jl $232,704.1""'1;" '($100,900) 1.,..............;...;'1,""., j...,,;..~..."--..;...n,_ ,..ilfi-.l.._.. ~. .--........._;8,._....<o..."'u_..rl:... .., "'""',iI _""'___"~ ....._.:,. 4...... ......l_,"'-_.....'''''..-'"_.....'-'.,,..Iil_ .Il........ _..k.n,~.... ."" ." "...c.:..I...,".,.,;:,.;'.-"''-_-'-''..:t.._.... .,,,,0, -172- OPI:,~, SPACE DIStRfCi'FtJ,N'D ' "': -'..' 3'5'(;),-: t_ ._ . . ,. _ '..~ ... ... _ . d "n" _. . _... _ .__ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses Utilities TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 3,464,643 1,468,207 1,238,310 $6,171,160 483,662 7,022,578 $7,506,240 4,668,459 1,565,557 1,434,055 $7,668,071 552,998 7,571,093 $8,124,091 ..;~ ::t'--'-"'1."I".'7":'."~'-'-"~"~"~''''''1 L~Ji~.,:'l.i?,g, .9,?.J1.~:llit~':I:,2,~lg~~~,:1 jinTIP1,;,1' 80G'AT6'ii":,ji"HI183S"435UTI J~:;'<l.iii."''''"''''-;'!;I>.:"",''''''':!i,;.;:;'~,,,,..................,..:ill FT~,~.' "iT7-'-'-""'--~1 ~~~:..-t'-.- ""--f!] ,:)~i!',;",?,',1,~,2,Q;?,,~li~~:.:;i;d.,g; ~,~...~:J~"qg.L11 $10,475,403 $11,866,649 "... ~'<W-"r,r -. ~ ,"'~. ,. 'r "'/!!:'.. -- ~ pi, (} ;";r;~;'~ ~t,!~!','t,t'i:1, 0' 'If ,tl~'i" :F,;:.lll ',:f'; O:~ ;"..1,_",..""., """l_l""h""l_l. "...,.....r..Li;.!4,J. ..,.,,14......... .n-rim..... '..;.1....."'~T""'''..llri, ;>.~!W..'i."'. " ....R7".'" "'1j~ L4ci!;lQ.,.:\ZMQ}JIlL..'dJ"lL62&;I~,;J $10,475,403 $11,866,649 1~'W)'_,,:""m"'''',/w':'(;'''~r''B'~'', ""'~--"Tm~'l"'":"'"'lI'1j1i'1I\'f'rn!:":r.~j:fW,~'''1'~!~!:''~':'''1'"''f''''''':~t........'u~'l!""'ft~<-::~!':....:-r...,."'{'~' "f',...."ww~~,~'~'7:"')t'"..~'~f'1,~'~"T..,"lr~::;rI."{,l 'j-:' ,!r:nII"I~,",..~t!'i ;,~ E.J:!~, ~ N D.!/~ ~T!yrr.'f.r':1:,;;~;!:~t~:!g'~~,rtr,lni!r:?::'} ":;'~.I~',}!r'?l;I,~lt$Jf, ~~~l Q80 iL, ii "'!'~.",,~.~q.6i029,'I~lfi'" ~ '::'~~'i:~~i;:;f:'nll;11~'r $Oil;:;H:';~I: r4tJ h' I' ,1.$0", ,~".I.lJ;,,,j,,J,,,,,,,,[,,,,--,,,':'::J/U/'Ml;,,,,,",,Il.alUlI~.,_..ljM,,.,".,,.,~liill:..'jl.,!L~[""J;"""_I'_',';",v....~._dit.",,~,,~_l.,["..",,.;cl!bh~~"..,..:;;..;n;~;~, ....-ll.>'Jm!ilLd;.,.I;;u.."",..,i::ll..J,:ti;',~;~ll>lJ""',,,..;:.;;1;,!,;;,.I...IU'"'n~ ",:';';.Jl:.;,,;l FUND DETAIL EXPENDITURES 342 CFD 11.M RHR McMillin 343 CFD 12-M Vlg7 344 CFD 13.M Vlg2 345 CFD 12M - OR Village 7 351 Town Centre Landscaping Dist I 352 Bay Blvd Landscaping Dist 353 Eastlake Maintenance Dist #1 354 Open Space District #1 355 Open Space District #2 356 Open Space District #3 357 Open Space District #4 358 Open Space District #5 359 Open Space District #6 361 Open Space District #7 362 Open Space District #8 363 Open Space District #9 364 Open Space District #1 0 365 Open Space District #11 366 Open Space District #13 367 Open Space District #14 368 Open Space District #15 369 Open Space District #17 28,740 3,360 o 3,360 o 9,063 204,123 53,502 11,664 57,928 69,614 29,269 17,633 17,236 57,025 60,055 69,822 113,392 o 262,580 13,190 3,652 -173. 49,986 150,941 4,914 3,425 o 8,876 230,763 56,507 12,435 48,469 67,409 31,044 21,294 14,417 59,325 53,128 70,766 129,251 o 291,051 13,287 2,849 "::"~ili,.' :"'''5'''6'17'"'4''',:, ""',""'... '1'1"0"""6'''0'8''1111 il-3k:;j!,(,:,t;Ei.L.",;:.:tlli:.1~;\~jJ!E; ;~.....i......, .1' 1"'t"":-r-:r'l'"';":;I";"'''~p'-'''''''l~'-~--' '''''ilill-: 4114;000-;"" - ,"'''';1-'''482';790'1-1 "."'l,......,,.-,,'.... "'d',"","'''~''''"'',;".;,,,IJI.',;'',,.-.-','..,'''''.''H.-';-',,;,,~;fi. ~Ttl[r',~U,,'ii~:':"'F~' ...... " 'U'""'tJ ":~:r:"'TI);i;}\(":I!'..:... n""~...!t';~ Ij";( ~i,.,.:fti":' i,l 1105,0: ''jI'!''iff,,;' 1';' ii~'~1 4; 2,,17), 1 !t.l~..."",......" , , 1u;l;""'.....:.J<..;;i~~'-'--,:..;...;.;..j. 1:~lli!2im~iji!zjz.;'~,~_~IIr;fmMmiT:I~:?I,?l?Id:1 UU:~F;j!1:';\f.iljfk:~;'.w'Cj'~j~ili~.7t~~'Wl~;f Ql:ia,:o'1 ."L;l"ih,,"".d.,illt;~lt,....;..,!lm,,6L..;.i.;J.,i '''~,..' ;.Hl1fm"!':"-r...~. _U':. .----""']i :(:'1:!f~I~I'!'r'~T,.-!".",.. _.n'im1 !,;SjMW:::dw!JH(!'~;~le~j1i:w;;;jH'jfm;d'::;'i~I~~~Z~~lliu [~"".,_.,,,.. ~..".. """jj "m~"""-'-""9EJ"~ "'I] '2311:571<'1'''1''- ,. 1'372'960"" :~:"i' j!ij........,J..'~.~,,~, ! Ii ':::,,:;a!lJ~,j""'_:!'N";" l, ~~!BEim,12i[~?,<l~~li:~!~i;~;L%tii~~?1ill] r"'7';Z"i~;r1'-4';7"-81 ]" 11'lf"<:1;'1l";r-15"~5-8'i::l ,', ~. ':. ": ,.j", . l" :' "',,'1,",' ,1...1-' 'ih,j)1 , " ;';"l;.lll~"",,,;,;.;<.;,,~..,, ,.,].__1 ",,,,,~llool_~,,'h,,,..._ ,,,.~,,,,..~f f!;il~n~;',;::n::,:,:';f4:"2'541I!i'ii:'~;;l!mlii+;w:i;43~:627'!h~ ~L1bJ,,,.,l,--.....i,jilliJllcl!!~J'.Llj;_..,i..,,=,,,,,~J lGii;i~", ':'86..3750i'1":.~,I,~'!19,f785'1" :',;j~,,;>;.L':",,ljlll,,....,;~, ;' ;,~._..~ii :;,:,;tlll;;,u:":::;",.:l..!,,,C,,,,,,",u,li 'r'n!t""""''i'''I>lu,,,;,,,''''''''''~''''''''''-'''''!'''''''''''''"''''''~'",, "'''..1m L::,1i'.'''1',~,:40 ;217iJil;"~ i'I,,:iiP6;404:;,j ~;;;i'i~2"2~6=7;:;"'0""!l"~~"I":1~;'m3t'f6'76::.r1 t:!Jmj;::,;;,,!:;:i,!t,'''',';'.,'\;,,,;j,,,,lmi:::I;;Jl1~,~:,,:':';",',."l,~,!,',."""L,,,,ill~ '!."~mr'''::::,!'.'f'1.. ... 't2,.~~..r.tj" Hinplrinw!'---'r'1"'-'-:'-""'''''~'''~ It:1:..J~f~;""~' 3,...1'~..'a~~~'9t:lli,:3~ ~9,9 A l'.:w,"""^"'-:-7',....~~.,~".......,~ --.",-.'t;"'''!l!!m=='':l'--'-~ ':i~:i'iki!t;i::('}63';8 7 8 U.bi::'!'iif!il!:;:;;'i7,4'!389 i~ '.f""...""""""",,,,,,,,;' ';";''''I,..;I.\;,-""",I~.J!I!("",!",.II",.!",,,,,,,,,,,...: ili~~I~~Ti'""59b37:<::0I;":';J, 80 884'1:11 iWi..'....1;~.l......"'....,_~aL~.J:~I:..;.._?,,....,.........:tl FiT~!iiF';;07'irt:78~f)6'i!117,;;ammn-':,'IT':~f3T945'il' hlr"JI,,,,.i,,,' ,1I1~1\~., '",~.........;" L ,,,,,,,...IIl,,,,,~.!,'''_,' ",,,,:,,,.,,:Jlj! q:';'I' I ~i56':5~1 81i'I'I' ,"~~;;.fi8:~'91";i lJw.WL~'~"~"M"_"" ,...~",_~L..J.....,t.;;l.~.,,,,..<l,.. .,~,.~I..Jdll J;~~i~!f12Ufi;aWm~iWimRQJjJ;'1,,;i;i~7ill;~IWmH!fil5;JI:S!,;,Q,1m ~;::::r339ii80-'i~',;;';~:38;{733-:'j' .w,,, ..~,L;"". .,_,.. ""--,,~.......,,.I, 'du.Jt!il~':"I~.......L",",,~.......!1 bgr'!':.',:ii:~J3j~J~Ji;f~~13WslE~4,f~;~m ~l~"'~'---!b~r~---'-.-j \i:F,';::"",;,':';1t--3j478,1'h :~,l" J,"/lW::j':iI7r748 :i, ,1U~II1\"'" """,,,w.,l..., "..,<"',''''..;j,..,,,dL.,,,,','nhlLh_,.,....,H,~\_ t~~ \~g'~~:~'~~~I~~:,I~~~R~iqrJ~~lp' "~" .~:~~' , :",~;" ~(, .,. :: . '~,~~tl 371 Open Space District #18 372 Open Space District #20 373 Open Space District #23 374 Open Space District #24 375 Open Space District #26 376 Open Space District #31 377 Open Space District #33 378 CFD 07M-Eastlk II Woods, Vista 379 CFD 08M,Vlg 6 McM & Oty Ranc 380 CFD 09M OR Vlg II 381 CFD 09M,OR Vlg II Brookfld She 382 CFD 99,2 Otay Ranch Vlg 1 We 383 Town Ctr Business Imprv Distr 386 Otay Ranch Acquisition Dist 387 CFD 98,3 Sunbow 2 388 Comm Facility 97,1 (Otay Rnch) 389 Otay Ranch Village 1,2,6,7,12 TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES 342 CFD 11,M RHR McMillin 343 CFD 12-M VIg7 344 CFD 13,M VIg2 345 CFD 12M, OR Village 7 351 Town Centre Landscaping Dist I 352 Bay Blvd Landscaping Dist 353 Eastlake Maintenance Dist #1 354 Open Space District #1 355 Open Space District #2 356 Open Space District #3 357 Open Space District #4 358 Open Space District #5 359 Open Space District #6 361 Open Space District #7 362 Open Space District #8 363 Open Space District #9 364 Open Space District #10 365 Open Space District #11 366 Open Space District #13 367 Open Space District #14 368 Open Space District #15 369 Open Space District #17 371 Open Space District #18 372 Open Space District #20 373 Open Space District #23 374 Open Space District #24 99,165 1,001,327 53,979 18,085 7,182 83,776 o 355,191 571,741 397,610 o 462,663 o 139,852 737,066 1,067,648 90,667 $6,171,160 31,151 386,851 o 332,246 1,051 20,295 258,619 58,585 12,957 45,816 77,311 29,553 19,182 13,368 63,924 63,301 74,889 99,021 14 316,734 14,966 3,864 88,165 934,669 49,593 19,202 -174- 103,488 1,002,541 43,754 20,029 7,709 87,111 o 386,527 818,132 642,222 o 620,320 o 221,881 813,062 1,492,918 88,240 $7,668,071 5,784 344,923 42,236 163,341 1,097 20,543 283,373 77,268 13,581 48,255 82,936 44,988 27,423 13,390 67,822 65,442 76,460 157,916 22 330,940 '21,462 5,261 101,009 996,351 51,396 24,978 , 121,J52:>:~f30,497 '1 1,173)352, ,1356062 , :,58,7?9 n' 5i;~33' i:?$'/~f1i;::;;}:':""" iH;;;:??,':~6Tii;t ;9,104 ",..,12,(3~5 r,' ,': 117,060'., ',' , 139,203 ,,0 ",/, ,0, ~91 ,781 ,615,'876, ,':~~:~~~ .:;':,.~~~:~:6': 0" '" ", " 0' , 737:002 720,09i. ,:__,::,' , 0: ' " ,'0 ' '565,5,00 '", '871,,265 991,'464 - 1,011,592 ",{895;650 , : ?,239,941' ",'",', ',,104,50,6, , ,',' '104916 '" ....,;,'"".....,........".,.,.,......................,'"..",'.,'i';.........'....';.;;"..w,.";! $10,475,403 $11,866,649 ~)~~~~ iSp(Qtj~t~'~,~V~1F.f{J'~i~~ ~_~~ ~:. ':~ ','~: -~~~~,~ '~':~-~~'_' i5~~:I 375 Open Space District #26 376 Open Space District #31 377 Open Space District #33 378 CFD 07M-Eastlk II Woods, Vista 379 CFD 08M-Vlg 6 McM & Oty Ranc 380 CFD 09M OR Vlg II 381 CFD 09M-OR Vlg II Brookfld She 382 CFD 99-2 Otay Ranch Vlg 1 We 383 Town Ctr Business Imprv Distr 386 Olay Ranch Acquisition Disl 387 CFD 98-3 Sunbow 2 388 Comm Facility 97-1 (Olay Rnch) 389 Otay Ranch Village 1,2,6,7,12 TOTAL REVENUES 7,952 79,151 o 167,044 295,970 500,122 o 591,457 (1,334) 63,329 879,696 1,822,891 84,635 $7,506,240 .175- 9,433 100,287 o 262,722 462,875 486,890 o 644,518 2,391 379,654 940,629 1,681,123 85,372 $8,124,091 $10,475,403 $11,866,649 [0 "WORj(;ERS"cJOMPEI'\ISAtll'O'N~IF'l:j:NO : . ~ '231'1 t _ _ _ _ _ 1 '"- ~_ _ _ _ _ ~_ ~ _ _ _ _ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Supplies and Services Other Expenses TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 683,414 2,069,161 $2,752,575 669,872 1,995,339 $2,665,211 ';;i'-';''ti'539';S4Cf)';:' ":,Y539"'s;iQ'l 1.''''">;;h.:,''':'i..,.:._,,...',..~;;jJ;:!iiJil:W;it.~!4.M..!^,............,jj Ie ,2;-5-50 ,00'6'lr;r~:;2:9i9:oT9'1 ~l""<;""".,,,,...n,.,......, ,w,"''''',o'~~''''';';'_''''_''''''''''''''d'''''_''.n,,'' $3,089,840 $3,458,859 2,904,591 $2,904,591 r;;;:":"2"~82 '1'-9"1:~7"7Q:":J;-2"'8--2-1r9-1-7iji1 3,050,30 1 b""":'!d..~","""'.I.',','"i~.j,..i;gilih,;'h.!L,...,!,,..,~.I,,',,.....",,::;c;';l $3,050,301 $2,821,917 $2,821,917 r;r~~"~''''~'''''''-''f1Y'>lW'1'''''''''~:)''''''.'''-;i~'!t;tJ~:':~~):'iiF~!rWJi~7l1'"'1,;~l,"!'~1l',r'IVlf"( f~''''-''--'''' .#"";t""i\::~t"f'f.i.t:~m"--,.."'~:, .......,'~':':.~~.'..,.'J1""""".."._..':. ,~"~,..,'" '~~W'~"""""~"~'''",,,'-~''-~''..,rW''<''l1 .t.JETcF.,lJ/'.JD ~CTIVITY;r':',"",C '1,1f.:1<':"I'i!' 'J;/ '" .r:;j,'";'''''",$,152,O,1~:I',,:i.' ," $385;090',~r';i ";($267,!l2~),; 11~~..($636:942p . ~"l~'."..,'ii,k .-., ,~"",'.."":;tr,k."h1,n,,,_ ., _ill'"'''."."ll!!''' ,-- .,,1 ~,'.,..,,,,.,, "' '.:;".,.IIU"..".,.;<'j,j. "". ""M"""",.:II,,_ '.:,...;~",,,, .,' ,J..". ,,,,,1....,,,.,;.-,.1,'1.., ...' ""OM".. ,,,,,l;,,w,,w.-'~'H""'H...,.,, ,;.. ,1;Jll, ..,....,'.,j~,', "'"ll".,.. .",.,...~,~"".~Il.,.,.ililj.il;,"m!l -176- ~~.~~~,E~l~ID~~$'~E,~r~~~~:'~~~~~'~!iiI~OiJl~r~j~, :_,....:~:' ";/~ ,i~;i~~ FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Personnel Services 265,738 259,010 Supplies and Services 54,375 29,055 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $320,113 $288,065 $324,889 $310,000 REVENUES Other Revenue 276,064 265,866 ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES $276,064 $265,866 $310,000 $310,000 -177- ;" :inJB:U:C,U~BUkiI1iY tRl'[J~f:Oi~lo . -c. . ~.:. 34r~ll _ "'- l _ _. . _ _.. __ _ _, ., +.___ ~_ ~ ___ _ EXPENDITURES Other Expenses TOTAL EXPENDITURES o $0 705,387 $705,387 l~I~:~E':j:E:iM::~l1:;tQ~ji:.~~rEj,r:;',~9~Q~;:QQ!I] $0 $1,800,000 REVENUES Transfers In ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES o $0 o $0 '"l:':"':'''';11,.~,11;1''''1r'''il1t:'0-'''~I!i=;''!J;!I''1'''K"'8''''0-0'''0-O'O'-:'~ 11IJ;,.t.i1!+n~Li'I!:'W:i;:!l:......""~!"::';bd;;>.i",,.,; ""..,,,;',,,,,,,,,,,,11'!/ $0 $1,800,000 r.......'"''''~'~.''''. "''''i!''~''m''~'.'''''''''V'''-''''''''!!rGf'~I'':'Jj':':irl'~'T;,''I:I,.'8ri:I.~7;,1~!'li;~I':';;~1Piri,W:0:YYf :~,~-j'.'$"'l>"",;~!A;'::I] ',i. '1"-$7.".....0 .... r.' ..".,,7)"'1;~;-j ,r'7i;:r:'-TJi:0aiT;r""$"-"-~(:mr:r'~:'~;',ifJr;.JITrITi;'$""!"'"::';1 ,NE] E.UND !ACTI rrY;JlirA 1";'.;11 l'j"ii.i;'Jlli;~dll!i;{",;:;",< ,'k;;H:i!IJ:i;"~;lj'-i,'" .,:l!.".,., O::,',I!,hdil:iil:( 5,.38 ; "I!;; <:"ltl:'!<ilii ,,"';0"',1': 0 '!(';'.(W;,:,!![il\; ;J,[i.i'\i{ 0 !,~ J,;..,..:",:.d)1l.!8~...:!k>::lL<!~l.Jl; ';' ., ',"",:4...,' "., ijji;.::bt...l..l:...i~:"I~~,..m-::';'~~_';:;~;;.;..,.....;L'.Jb~//,,;~"":''ili.!;;,,~J;.~ii!j;:;:~~!;j;..l':1L..;..::l~'!.,;.;;.ll;., .178. .-m:~Ci~~INO~~G~IRIE-Pt~e;EM~~~ H;J!NE:f'.. '~ .. -_ 39'~>1 FUND SUMMARY EXPENDITURES Capital Transfers Out TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES Use of Money & Property Other Revenue ESTIMATED TOTAL REVENUES 734,677 o $734,677 196,555 o $196,555 $0 $7,382 (2,026) 269,851 $267,825 2,072 49,697 $51,769 $0 $0 t"""'''''''<<;"'''''''~~''''--'''''~''''''~~11,,:1~!~n-;:IDnm1Ft''1r:!'T~~~'''--'-''~'':t"p'''~--:---,.........'~'f, ,'i''l:1f1l;:--I' ~;;-r::;:'7-r:~"-"-"~~ NET IiUND ACTIVIT.Y ,'!","." ",1' r .1.' '-', r"." ,. ". ,.,' '.($466852)""" .($144786)"", ,,:.! .) "".:', $0' ,~,.. .'",," ($7'382) b ;,"""""'" ;;i;)i"'I,,~jb;,.;ih;i';;i;';";;;liil;"IJ;.W,';;;,i!:\.:: '."ii;,i;illw;;,ll:ilr'::,:::,:,;,;;,jjt:.J,:Jb;,;);-,;L;;';';ii",...."\",I'~i, ,?, "';;""1",."~:~,;i~1;i!:",,,,.;\li':'1~1';;;';;;;\; ;,!;!~J~IJtli'U:;l::;<: >;,i:;;Ll."",~m,",;',;;;;:;:):liLi;;tI.lo,>l>,i';:~,; ,; ;' ,;, i.i,., , -179- .180. ;. <': .N~~-G~PITA~.:IMP.ROYE~EN!1I~R?JECif ,ati~G~.lI '. 'jl . ,'- r. 'FundIng Summary by Project T'){Pe .' " -. . _ ..... _. w ~ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ ARRA Homeless Prevention Program ARRA TOTAL r.........-............'I.....~~. ,.' ,1:$795'1 '4' 6 ' ~'~1,_.....J.".._~~' $795,146 CDBG Affordable Housing Project for Very Low Income (NSP) South Bay Regional Homeless Center Youth Services for High..Risk Youth Chula Vista Family Assessment and Referral Fair Housing Counseling Services Family Violence Treatment YMCA Youth Development Programs KidCare Express Mobile Unit Project Hand Therapeutic Recreation Services Food 4 Kids Backpack Program Safe Kids Transportation Services Meals-Dn-Wheels Chula Vista Community Access Program WizKidz Program Interfaith Shelter Network Thursday's Meal Fair Housing Audit Services South Bay Adult Day Health Care Transportation Caring Neighbor Rehabilitation Services Task Force on the Homeless CDBG TOTAL $1,461,550 ,181, :;:: :'~"~',,::<'~@~~~~flil~~~ '1(M~~'<~~Mf~'~~lIt.JJfi{Q"~~1Ji !a'~I~G'E'ii' .;;. ~ : ~ : .?~ :. :\.:-::::: '.'~'~" ~. '.". .:1 " 'ffuna7ng'SiJm;i1ai"y.l6y:Pr,~lect f;ype".!-~ '. . - ." ,":. ;, _~ ",:J, -~. ;.'~:_ _ ~.~;. ~--,.-- _-.. _ - -~;::-,"{".--=,,- "tL ~- ,_<<--.'..... _, '"" _ _" l"_ ___ .:: ~__..:..__ HOUSING HOUSING TOTAL $83,804 REDEVELOPMENT Bayfront and Third Avenue Southwest Specific Plan REDEVELOPMENT TOTAL $300,000 GRANDi TOTAL - ALL PROJECTS $2,640,500 -182- p o R IP o s E D B u D G E 1 CAP~TAl ~MPROVEMENl PROC RAM Capital Improvement Program Summary Revenue Summary Expenditure Summary Capital Improvement Projects Summary -183- :_l~fl ,l,,-.l>'_r-.:f!li" ,I" ,,,' l"~,, i :;~.!f;;~i,;!::::,;';'i~i:;~:~t.'~ r""'""""""'~'''''''''''' I, ";,."...,:,,,,]J"""':"""l ;;:i~;< ; I;, ' ;~[, d:;l~:~il ':lil~!~:i~'::::I:;r.;:;:i;i:'~;I;!;:: f' "1 '1;'" "t....,,~,',! < ",''''-,.'''',''' T'f < ~:;j <g~~l!;:;:;';:l :~~~~i;':il':,:~{:; ;i:~:~ '"'':'qtJi'-'.,:..,,,I.''''''''' , '~'::: '~l:: ':1. r:;t.~ ~f-;;S!;:::';f'~~) ',;: :' "~'IL. <t'!".<!';,' ',~'<:!,!l,\ll I:;,;, :1;11":1 ";';,;':,,:<,,- _'l,!",.,,-,,:'''''-'',,', ,", ~ 'il'" p' l' , ", I' !,. ,.,1>',. '^ --,.... ,,! ,," " t_;;;:ii~;::l:I~J,:;iifffi~~~!~~:,~;::!:Ji!~: ~,<"",Io,_" 'iF:'~:j'" ')"-"""1"'.,1'.1-> "'1 :;,:f'~ll.l':;;!i,:\';;i:"'.:':;i:il,!i,;i:;r,..!:!:1 ";,',,, "[';"1"1,'i;j""'" ','''''" ," '.Iij li;"1)~llii;!:"!!~;1' ~ J, " ',:ii>' It;~~:l~~;l """"h.'~"~' ", ': :~;j: tltll!/ ' ~- :' ',:~:,;l;, ,t,..". ,H 'h", ,.,c,,, is,;, ", 'j ;-,t,.~g::J~~ B'1,,,,,j,,,,.,,,,:.>"""'""-"lt"i ""''''''''1 0{ :;: -:: ~';~~l~' ' , r:1<.~ ;: ill ::,!~;r -: rtl<l'l~ l'll'l.:< ~!I'1!,~!r~ 'd>-t, ~j~l;ir:::;,!{.::' . ,t~~~'ii,:ll::!,::~:l I". ~ ,~lb' , ~:.J.!1.\ >,,"~: <", ~:ifl~ :i!!:::C < 1- ~~ujl;;:'::;;;ii\:~!~:' "~~!':':':!l:I"J4 :1,:; ':1;: ~:~~ ~:i; , . i;::::<:'::;;jii!!,~l;l ::ri!)~;; :;; ;~J::~::::;~;;.<.!;i;i;:;'~l~' r"'"""'" ,,,,,.,,',', ,""I,,,,'''',,'' """".",,1 r'1!i~i;.i~rff~~tj'it}:~llli~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY To follow is a summary of the fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The program outlined herein was developed with two main goals in mind. The first is to build upon the City's growing recognition of the need for additional commitment and funding for infrastructure preservation efforts. The second goal is to recognize the changing fiscal position of the City and downturn in development-related capital revenues. While there are still several development- related capital projects in the program, the overall CIP seeks to balance both the types of projects and the geographical locations where projects would occur to best meet the needs of the City and its residents, businesses and visitors. Significant funding is dedicated to on-going infrastructure rehabilitation projects. These include streets, sidewalks and sewers. In particular, street-related rehabilitation projects are predominant in this program. These projects occur on a citywide basis and are part of a comprehensive process that the City performs every year to assess the most cost efficient manner to preserve and rehabilitate the City's infrastructure. The City utilizes a comprehensive pavement management system, which forms the basis for the development of current and future pavement rehabilitation projects. With regard to the street rehabilitation effort, the City continues to focus significant attention and resources on street improvements in western Chula Vista. A number of projects have been undertaken in the past several years, including over $10 million of street rehabilitation projects, as well. as significant sidewalk improvements. That effort will continue and will also include the formation of assessment districts on a number of streets in the Castle Park neighborhood. During fiscal year 2007-08, the City successfully completed the process for obtaining a $9.5 million loan from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for street improvements in the Castle Park neighborhood. Those loan proceeds became available to the City in June of 2008 and will be -185- paid back from the City's annual allotment of COBG funds. Construction of First Avenue, between Naples Street and Palomar Street, is complete and a number of street improvement projects are moving forward, including work on Glenhaven Way (west of First Avenue), Oxford Street (Third Avenue to Alpine Avenue) and Second Avenue (Naples Street to Palomar Street). Once these projects on the main streets in the neighborhood are completed, remaining funds will be utilized on local streets within the Castle Park neighborhood. The City continues to focus on its Annual Sewer Rehabilitation Program, which expends approximately $1 to $2 million annually for the replacement and rehabilitation of sewer pipes and manholes. The City also utilizes standardized evaluation and ranking criteria in televising and evaluating the condition of sewers in order to assure that the most critically impacted sewer infrastructure is replaced or rehabilitated first. As previously mentioned, over the last several years the City has evaluated the condition of its Storm Drain facilities, which includes approximately 88,000 lineal feet of corrugated metal pipe (CMP) storm drain within the City limits. CMP storm drains have not been allowed for permanent use in the City of Chula Vista for over 20 years due to more rapid deterioration than other types of pipes, such as plastic and reinforced concrete pipes. The deteriorating CMP storm drains were categorized as Priorities 1 thru 4, as follows: Priorit 1 2 3 4 5 Year Lineal Feet of CMP 2,282 ft 21,858 ft 9,698 ft 2,437 ft 6,785 ft Much of the CMP identified as Priority 1 has been rehabilitated. However, due to limited funding, priorities 2,3 and 4 are being addressed on an as-needed basis, either after failure has occurred or when failure is imminent. The CIP Program seeks to find dedicated funding for this critical program; however, due to eligibility limitations and availability of such funds, it has been increasingly difficult to fund CMP replacement and rehabilitation work. A total of $1.2 million in TransNet monies are being proposed to fund calendar year 2009 emergency drainage projects. While this focus on infrastructure continues, the City has also engaged in a program for the construction of several facilities. Since 2002, the City has undertaken over $63 million of new park and recreation facility construction. Construction activities have commenced on Mt. San Miguel Community Park and All Seasons Park construction is proposed in the fiscal year 2009-10 program. -186- Over 151 acres of new parkland and 58,000 square feet of new recreation center space will have been added between 2002 and the end of fiscal year 2008-09. The $50 million renovation of the Civic Center Complex is complete and the buildings are fully occupied. The design of the Rancho del Rey Library is complete and construction is planned to commence as soon as sufficient Public Facilities Development Impact Fees (PFDIF) are generated and/or library construction grant funding is secured. Given the economic conditions within the construction/development industry, as well as the competitive nature of library grants, it is not possible at this point in time to estimate a construction schedule. -187- -188- CIP REVENUE SUMMARY B n the fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program, there are a number of key funding I sources; to follow is a brief description of some of the most programmed funding sources. TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) funds are derived from sales tax revenues levied in San Diego County that are collected by the State specifically for use on transportation related projects in San Diego County. The regional metropolitan planning agency, San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), programs these funds to municipalities within San Diego County. Revenues vary from year to year, depending on the amount of sales tax available to the region and the number and costs of projects for which municipalities, local transit, and Caltrans request funding. The revenue approved for municipalities is based on the specific cost estimates that are required to be submitted as part of the annual request for funding. In fiscal year 2009-10, Transportation Sales Tax proposed budgets are $8.6 million, with an additional $3.4 million of TransNet ARRA funds (TransNet funds re-allocated from Caltrans projects that received Federal ARRA funding for construction). Of that amount, approximately $7.7 million is programmed for pavement rehabilitation. A number of smaller traffic congestion improvement projects and transportation planning efforts are also funded from TransNet. The City continues to ensure that a minimum of . . - - 70% of its TransNet funds are allocated to congestion relief efforts. This limits the City's use of these funds for minor pavement rehabilitation efforts to a maximum 30% of the City's annual allocation. The City intends to explore the possibility of dedicating additional amounts,to minor pavement efforts (projects with less than a one-inch thick overlay) with SANDAG in the future. -189. SEWER FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND The Sewer Facility Replacement Fund is a fee based revenue source that all properties pay each month as part of their sewer bills. The funds can be utilized to replace, rehabilitate or upgrade existing sewer facilities. In fiscal year 2009-10, a total of $0.7 million is proposed to be funded. Among the projects receiving funding are the annual rehabilitation program ($0.3 million) and Robinhood Ranch II Pump Station Improvements ($0.4 million). In addition, approximately $5.8 million of existing funding and projects will carry over. TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEE The Traffic Signal Fee is a trip based development impact fee that is charged with the issuance of building permits for new construction. The fee can be utilized for the installation and upgrade of traffic signals throughout the City. In fiscal year 2009-10, it is proposed that $1.1 million be funded. Traffic Signal Fees are down, as are all development related revenues, and the projects list for the fund has been re-prioritized However, the City has received notification of American Recovery Reinvestment Act funds for eligible Traffic projects, which allowed for approximately $0.8 million of Traffic Signal funds to be reallocated to other projects. PROPOSITION 1B HIGHWAY FUNDS In 2006-07, the voters of the state approved Proposition 1 B. This proposition included funds to be provided to cities within the state for local roadway improvements. The City will receive a total of approximately $7.0 million, $36 million in fiscal year 2008-09 and the remaining portion in fiscal year 2009-10. PROP 42 (TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF FUND) Several years ago, the voters approved Proposition 42, which provided funding for cities to improve streets. The funds can only be utilized for street improvements and the City has utilized these funds to augment its annual pavement rehabilitation efforts. In fiscal year 2008-09, the amount budgeted from this fund for this purpose is $1.0 million. In fiscal year2009-10, the proposed amount to be budgeted is $348,000. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS Each year, the City receives approximately $1.9 million in CDBG funds. Of this amount, approximately $1.1 million is available for capital improvement projects. The City of Chula Vista received Section 108 loan funds in June of 2008 for the Castle Park street improvement projects; the debt service on that loan will be paid back from the City's annual allotment of CDBG funds. -190. This will reduce the amount of CDBG funds available for other capital projects to approximately $0.5 million annually for the next ten years. All of these funds are programmed for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Curb Ramp construction. The City's ADA Annual. Curb Ramp Program improves pedestrian accessibility and walkability for all citizens, in compliance with ADA requirements and standards. Ramps are constructed in priority order, from a Transition Plan of approximately 1200 ramps approved by the City Council, and based primarily on proximity to public and transit services, public facilities, schools, and commercial facilities. Upon completion of the ramps identified in the Transition Plan, retrofits of existing, older ramps will be required to provide greater levels of accessibility. MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS The City has applied for and been approved to receive various grants to fund Capital Improvement Projects. These grants include Smart Growth Incentive, TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program, and Public Ubrary Federal Grants. Cumulatively, the amounts budgeted for fiscal year 2009-10 is approximately $2.8 million (not including ARRA exchange funds). In addition, the City continues to pursue American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funds. The City was recently approved for $34 million in ARRA funds via an exchange in TransNet funds through SANDAG. These funds are programmed in the fiscal year 2009-10 program for Pavement, Traffic Signal related projects and Third Avenue Streetscape. AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT FUNDS President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act into law, which provides "economic stimulus" funds in the amount of $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) nationwide. A large portion of the ARRA funds are intended to benefit individuals through tax relief, Medicaid, and mortgage assistance. Another portion is intended to assist public agencies in providing services and improving infrastructure to keep people employed as well as to create new jobs. City staff has been working diligently since before the adoption of ARRA to identify opportunities that would benefit Chula Vista and be ready for aggressive timelines and application periods. In anticipation of the bill, the U.S. Conference of Mayors asked cities to come up with ready-to-go projects that would create jobs and invest in infrastructure. Along with other San Diego county cities, through SANDAG, Chula'Vista identified a number of projects already designated as "shovel ready" that can start immediately. Most cities focused on proposals for roads, sewer and other infrastructure projects. In all, Chula Vista's wish list'added up to about $540 million. -191- The City already knows of many projects that would benefit the community, if funding were available. Many of the ARRA funds come with very specific eligibility criteria and regulatory guidelines. If the City has some projects already identified that would meet that criteria, then that could free up less restrictive money for other community projects. For example, Federal highway funds generally may only be used on designated arterial roadways. There are a number of infrastructure projects already identified in the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan and the Western Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF). Any federal highway funds received by the City would be used on designated arterial roadways even if they are lower on the priority list, thereby making more local funds, such as TransNet, available for use on local streets. Transparency is an important component of ARRA. The Federal government has created a website to convey results and performance measurements to the public. Similarly, it will be important to keep our local residents apprised of the City's actions and results with ARRA funds. City staff has created a scorecard to track potential applications for ARRA funds, funds received, and performance with funds received. The scorecard and any related ARRA information will be maintained on the City's website. The following chart summarizes the funding sources for the Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 2009-10. Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Expenditures by Funding Source TransNet 38.1% Miscellaneous Grants . Miscellaneous 9.9% ~ 0.4% I / Library Grants I.------ 0.6% \ CDBG , 3.6% Traffic Signal 3.5% "'----- Sewer Funds 5.6% Transportation Grants 15.1% ~ Del.elopment Impact Fees " 13.3% Park ACqUisituin~ Redel.elopment and Del.elopment Funds 6.5% 3.3% -192- CIP EXPENDITURE SUMMARY The capital budget complements the operating budget by providing funding for major capital projects. The fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) plan includes $30.4 million in funding. It should be noted that of that amount, approximately $4 5 million are reallocation of existing funds from prior years. In addition, there is approximately $10 million of existing appropriations that will carry over into fiscal year 2009-10. The majority of the funding recommended with the adoption of the budget pertains to the rehabilitation/improvement of existing facilities. The following chart provides a breakdown, by project type, of the total $30.4 million of appropriations proposed with this budget. Fiscal Year 2009-10 CIP Budget by Project Type Major Streets 26.3% Drainage Gen GovUOther 8.0.'1 Projects/RDA 44% , Library ':__________ 0.6% Sewer 5.3% Parks and Recreation 6.5% -193- FACILITIES The total cost of building and park facilities over the last 15 years has exceed $100 million, which includes the completion of the renovations to the Civic Center Complex, various recreational facilities, new and renovated parks, new and renovated fire stations and other projects. The funding sources for these projects included development impact fees (DIF), residential construction tax (RCT), redevelopment funds (RDA), grants and the General Fund. With respect to the Civic Center, the project has been completed and fully occupied as of November 2008. The final component to the Civic Center project will be the construction of a new Fire Station NO.1. The Master Plan for the Fire Facility network has been completed. LIBRARIES The City received $95,000 in Public Library Federal Funding proposed to fund the Civic Center Library Veterans Wing. Another major project is the construction of the Rancho del Rey Library, which will be one of four branch libraries serving the four corners of the City. The 31,129 square- foot facility will be a full-service library, with a capacity of up to 130,000 books, audio-visual materials and newspapers and magazines. Besides some 28,000 items in Spanish, there will also be unique cultural heritage collections focusing on Filipino, Pan-Asian and Hispanic cultures in reflection of the community's diversity. The estimated cost of the project is $19.1 million. The design of the library has been completed. Due to the slowdown in development activities, the fund balance of the PFDIF (which is responsible for 100% of the costs of the project) is not sufficient to move forward with construction. It is unknown when sufficient PFDIF revenues will be available to commence construction. PARKS Numerous major neighborhood parks, including Cottonwood Park, Heritage Park, Breezewood Park, Harvest Park and Santa Venetia Park in Otay Ranch and Sunset View Park in Eastlake Greens were completed. In fiscal year 2005-06, Harborside Park, the first new park in western Chula Vista in over 25 years and Mountain Hawk Park in Eastlake Vistas were completed. In addition to these neighborhood parks, three large community parks were also opened to the public. These parks were Veterans Park, Salt Creek Park and -194- ."1' -~::r~ l :,~~:,,-..,,~! >:..1!~'1; ._.r, 1,--:1 .,'/-, ~~~'="?""" ,.V 1.""",,- "~,",, ~"", i_,,~~~~~:.! , I,:~~~~-~;';:;~~:,;.!.I b : ~,~;._ l';;~~'~Tr:.;;-=N' R lilt UllllllllWl"nma=tty Jri _ w ... i~! .-- ......""':.~ - ~._,.. .. ,... -.. .: .... ~~. Montevalle Park. All three of these facilities included recreation centers. Several other neighborhood parks were completed in fiscal year 2006-07 including, Horizon Park and Winding Walk Park in Otay Ranch. The renovations of Otay Park ($1.9 million) were completed in the spring of 2008. Also, the design of Mt. San Miguel Park, a community park in San Miguel Ranch ($7.0 million), has been completed. Funding for Mt. San Miguel Ranch Community Park was appropriated mid-year in fiscal year 2008-09 with construction currently underway. The new neighborhood park in Village 7 of Otay Ranch, named All Seasons Park, ($2.9 million) has seen its master plan approved and design is nearing completion. It is proposed that $2 million be appropriated in fiscal year 2009-10 as necessary to begin construction. FIRE FACILITIES Included in the proposed five year CIP forecast is construction of the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) Fire Station. The City is currently negotiating a development agreement to offset the construction costs and operating costs for the EUC fire station. Fire stations one and five are in need of replacement. Built in 1954, Fire Station 5 was part of the Montgomery Fire District. This station is 55 years old and in a state of deterioration. Further, Fire Station 5 is far past its useful life needing constant repair due to structural damage that has been brought on by age - Station 5 is currently in need of a new roof and other major repairs. Fire Station 1 was built in .1948 and is 61 years old. This station also has structural damage due to its age and is in need of a roof. The Fire Department will apply for economic stimulus funding (ARRA) to address the replacement of both of these stations as both of these stations meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the grant guidelines. Station 5 is recommended to be relocated to a larger site adjacent to the South Library. The relocation of Station 5 to a larger site will allow the expansion of future service delivery to respond to growth needs. The Fire Facility Master Plan document is being updated to achieve fire and emergency medical service delivery within national public safety standards. The plan will be presented to Council in an upcoming workshop this fall Lastly, discussions are underway regarding Bayfront Capital Improvement Projects as follows: . Bayfront Sewer Lift Station - $12.4* million fiscal year 2010-11 . . Bayfront Fire Station North East corner of Bay Blvd and "J" Street - $12 million fiscal year 2010-11 . Bayfront Park Improvements - $6 68* million fiscal year 2011-12 'Includes estimated design, project management and contingency -195- It is anticipated that these projects will be programmed beginning with fiscal year 2010-11 and in future years. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS The infrastructure portion of the CIP budget contains significant funding for a variety of infrastructure improvements. As discussed above and elsewhere within the City's budget, a substantial amount of the funding is focused on infrastructure improvements in the western portion of the City and preservation of infrastructure citywide. Over the past few years, City staff has presented a number of reports to the City Council with regard to the condition and capacity of existing infrastructure (i.e., pavement, corrugated metal pipe, storm drains, sewers, roadways, etc.) citywide, as well as the lack of sidewalks and other public improvements primarily within the western portion of the City, especially within the Montgomery Annexation area. . Adequate funding is currently not available to build new infrastructure and maintain existing infrastructure. Therefore, the CIP strives to balance the need and desire to provide enhanced public facilities, while assuring that existing infrastructure is maintained and preserved in at least a minimally acceptable condition over the long-term. With the adoption of the fiscal year 2004-05 budget, the City Council approved a financing plan for infrastructure improvements in western Chula Vista. This financing plan revolved around a two- pronged financing program. One element of the program was a $9 million bond issue that would be repaid from the City's Residential Construction Tax (RCT) revenues over a period of 30 years. That financing was completed in late summer of 2004 This portion of the financing was earmarked for drainage and park improvements. With the receipt of those funds, work has been completed on a number of drainage projects in western Chula Vista. A total of $4.7 million of the financing was dedicated to drainage improvements. The balance of these funds was utilized to construct Harborside Park ($2.1 million), Otay Park renovations ($1.9 million) and improvements to Lauderbach Park ($.6 million) -196- The second portion of the financing is a $9.5 million loan through the US Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Section 108 loan program. The loan will be repaid through the City's annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement from HUD and will be paid back over a period of 20 years. The Section 108 loan is earmarked for street improvements in the Castle Park area. The City formally submitted its application for the loan in May of 2006 and the loan was approved in fiscal year 2006-07. The loan funds became available to the City in June of 2008. With the approval of the loan, work has commenced on the projects. The City Council directed that the main streets in the neighborhood proceed first. First Avenue is complete, with Oxford Street, and Second Avenue moving forward. Also moving forward is Glenhaven Way. This street is not a main street in the neighborhood; however, it intersects with First Avenue, has sufficient signatures on the assessment district formation petition and offers some economies of scale Other major efforts include the City's annual pavement management program that will be funded at a level of $7.7 million. This effort is augmented by funds previously appropriated (approximately $10 million are being carried over into the new fiscal year and contracts continue to be issued). In the coming years the city will be seeking other revenue sources to try to maintain a similarly high level of reinvestment in our pavement citywide. In addition, the City was fortunate to receive TransNet ARRA exchange funds totaling $3.36 million. Those funds will be utilized on Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways ($2.61 million) and Traffic Signal Modification Projects ($0.75 million). These funds are being received as TransNet funds, thus providing an additional $3.36 million of programmable funding. Also included in the budget is funding for new ADA accessible curb ramps ($504,922), traffic signal modification and installations ($1.965 million), and sewer rehabilitation, improvements, a feasibility study, and capacity enhancements ($1.7 million). The budget also includes funding for continued -197- traffic count, monitoring, neighborhood and pedestrian safety, signing and striping, and congestion relief programs ($1.185 million). The city was the recipient of Smart Grow1h Incentive and Environmental Mitigation Program funding. The Smart Growth Incentive is proposed to fund Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements ($2 million), Palomar Gateway Specific Plan ($400,000) and Industrial Boulevard Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements ($283,900). The Environmental Mitigation Program funding is proposed to fund the Cactus Wren Habitation Restoration - Central City Preserve Area ($373,048). OTHER Several other projects are being proposed for redevelopment and upgrade/maintenance of information technologies specific to capital improvement projects. The projects proposed include the Downtown Parking District Improvements ($120,000), storefront renovation ($150,000) and upgrade and maintenance of the capital improvement software (CIPAce), AutoCAD, GIS OrthophotographylTopography and Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program ($75,000). The replacement of fuel storage tanks at the Public Works Center is also being proposed in the fiscal year 2009-10 program. CIP PROJECT GEOGRAPHICAL BALANCE Council has indicated that one of its primary goals in the coming years is a continued focus on capital and infrastructure needs in the western portion of the City. For this discussion, the terrn western refers essentially to those areas of the City west of Interstate 805. As a sub-area in the western portion of the City, the projects that are specific to the Montgomery area are broken out separately. Also, a category of projects has been developed that is called Citywide. The types of projects that are typified by Citywide include by are not limited to the annual pavement rehabilitation program, sidewalk rehabilitation program, ADA Curb ramp program and sewer facility rehabilitation program. As the eastern portion of the City continues to rapidly develop, there is a substantial need for infrastructure improvements. Developers, as part of their development approval obligations, construct many of the improvements that occur in the eastern portions of the City. For this reason, those projects which provide public benefit are not part of the City's CIP program. The actual amounts proposed for the geographical areas are depicted in the following table: -198- ~: '. ",'-:'--."" ,'~1": ,', . , J~i~j]~ldjXWlOO',L' ..~ '-,.:. f:'" .. . - ;: . " * ..1".' .' . .. .... . .".. " . " ~'.. ~ _. ._ r', , ".. .;t.",.; -.," t' . .0' Urban Core $588,048 2% Citywide $12,842,973 42% Eastern CV $5,660,271 19% Montgomery $770,000 3% Southwest $1,567,570 5% Western CV $9,014,440 30% Total $30,443,302 100% "~.",t., . r,' . '....'. ,.~~~.. '~ " ..............,., .. ......., , ' ,.,. ~ .!' Urban Core $588,048 5% Montgomery $770,000 7% Southwest $1,567,570 13% Western CV $9,014,440 75% Total $11,940,058 100% Western Chula Vista Breakdown Given the nature of the citywide projects, it is safe to say that 50% to 60% of those expenditures typically occur in western Chula Vista though this can change from year to year. Assuming that 50% holds true, then 61% of the capital expenditures programmed for fiscal year 2009-10 are earmarked for western Chula Vista and Montgomery, It must also be noted that the eastern Chula Vista projects that the City itself undertakes are overwhelmingly funded by development impact fees or other revenues directly related to development activities (Traffic Signal FundITDIF/PAD), thus leaving significant revenue streams available to fund projects in the western portion of the City. -199. <it;; .c.~ ",_. .4JL' ',~ .air, ..",_~ .,.~ "-~-"'l-~--'"~-;~ ~~~ crnr Of ('P"'H'" ',J' ',' A", "", . ','S'I"""""'" , 't' '1!U "'iii '\I'''>'' ~", 1\,;; I,"!ill I'i ; 'i- r' Iii , #' f' Elm. " , r:'~ -200- c " ~ .', -j;CAPl"lTA:( IM'PR6vrM~N,t BtJiDGHli .- :. ;:'" "-1 : .~. <.,' ,:, '. j., :fundi~g Suiri0a;y by 'Pr.~je(Jt lIype '~ ." < '.' 1 DRAINAGE DR180 DR182 DR183 Emergency Storm Drain Replacement Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Avenue to Hilltop Drive DRAINAGE TOTAL "'-~-"-'-"'01 ['!J.!:?pq,Q..Q9''''! , ii'IW$956'6'5'6;i;; t".l.l. .,~:: l~...~,,-,-, ~..........,,,=il li:":-""; .....,.-..'>4f~..""'t'.'f!":ilI ti';;j;~2"Q,q.;g,~92:r.; $2,450,000 GENERAL GOVERNMENT GG183 GG187 GIS-OrthographylTopography Project Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL ""'M.'"' ..."...... " ""$15'000 'J ill ~l' ," ,,' " ,~i ........"'.....1...1.,;.'-.~ W1.i:iW$'7:fii6'om :!i~;~;i~jDI.;;,;;,,,,,;!_,,,,,:!::i;] $87,000 LIBRARY LB137 LB143 Automation Advancements & Upgrade Civic Center Library Veterans Wing LIBRARY TOTAL .' ..,.,~,,,,_.:.;. ",','.~M'-'''T''~'''' " 1 02(64~'i'l ........!_,/j. '''.....'1''"''''"''''''''?', $95,.9,9.9 ' $197,644 -201- : . - - -, -. 0 - f CAPI'if:-A'l ,1~~P~.O~EM:itN1f iBUI!3GElf - .', '.1 i..,: _,' ~ ; Funding 'Summary ,by Project 1!rp~ _ _ _~, _" _ ..~_ j LOCAL STREETS STL291 STL303 STL304 STL305 STL323 STL342 STL346 STL351 STL352 STL354 STL355 STL356 STL357 STL359 STL360 STL361 STL362 STL363 Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements First Avenue Impvmts Palomar - Naples Glenhaven Way Amy Street Improvements Oxford Street Improvements Third to Alpine Pedestrian Master Plan Second Avenue Improvements - Naples Street to Palomar Street Pavement Minor Rehabilitation Bikeway Master Plan Update ADA Curb Ramps FY09-10 Pavement Major Rehabilitation FY2009-10 Pavement Minor Rehabilitation FY2009-10 South Broadway Improvements, Main Street to Southern City Limits Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Prop 1 B) Naples Street & Oleander Ave. Cross Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps Construction' Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Palomar Street Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements LOCAL STREETS TOTAL r::',;:,r:]~-""~"'-:!""'''''''''; ",'"'{ , "I,i, $235' 000' " '''''':':;:11.".""."",'"..._".".;<1, i;i;~l~JW:W$""'~""'~~""'" "....~l! 1~.~::"'"lJ,_ 2Q,.QQQJill ;prtllJ;:111lr""'"'''' 11."''' "":n1R c ,.:imJmilL~,~g;Q.Qg;r:i!1 15:'6o'b:~ ,'<..r.~.f.:':"'!'f .n9_'!',Q.Qgg;n ::~ ,.;''''.........''~'..1f.. ....... ,Jl.?:QQQ,iliJ '<'C'llll"'..,,"'!''''~.''w.'''';.'.1 ;' l%il.~,~4~, Q,QQ , :i ";"':'-' "'d'6'''~'''''~':;'~J' $11,878,339 MAJOR STREETS STM35 STM35 STM36 STM36 North Broadway Reconstruction Otay Lakes Road Widening Heritage Road Bridge Reconstruction Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways MAJOR STREETS TOTAL ::'$2'3681"600;") iLib......,,,!;"~"~,..!_.......,,il..ljilll F'l~"'~~-'t."'~JTl ' ,\.~9,Q.~.QgQI;!ill . :3 1"5T27\ '" .~..:..""_, ,....,~",~ui ,l~:( ,~"~"''''''<)IDf \"'~_?"?. LQ, 9,Q,Q.d $7,793,271 -202- Ii' :-1 c~p,n;~UMPR@VE'M~N"F ;BU~'@iH ;-,', ,- ',I :' ~' '.,' :". j Ftmding S~'!J~ary 'Jjyj>roje~!~ type .~. ,,_ J OTHER PROJECTS OP200 OP202 OP206 OP208 OP212 OP217 OP218 Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program CIP Advanced Planning Automation" AutoCAD Upgrade CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase Downtown Pakring District Improvements Palomar Gateway Specific Plan Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area OTHER PROJECTS TOTAL ::;1'1'1'[' :$36"0""0'0.1 )-_.,..,;1'. ,,' .' t._"......_Ifu:~""....,..,..."","'",,;i 7:"'," If::-SS'200Q'Ta ;J..:;.;:,1;.;:;..,.,..-.....',''''~~k;:'J ::'!"~!":$10"660 ': ."E.... ......"'....",,,, "," 1:,;~:;~Ji!$'2'6:0'oc}'-!i\1 l..,l",u:.::~."'.."...""''''''.. r;1~4~.'..";~"'."'''..'!"'''...''''-''''.!t " :,,::'$120;000"'1'1 .".fr~wh-,.._..,,,..'h,,,,,.,""",,,",,,,.,'i ?)\~jq;'!t$4;75'1'6'6' lL....I~L,....,..d....,..' l'r-'~.j;. IU!~~;IJ:;>~,~Z;~;.Q,1~?" $1,120,048 PARKS AND RECREATION PR279 All Seasons Park PARKS AND RECREATION TOTAL i:l::'.-''''~:!.'''''''''''~'''~''''''''''~l ~";,:$2,000:000 I ["",,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,,',, $2,000,000 REDEVELOPMENT RD241 Storefront Renovation Program REDEVELOPMENT TOTAL :i;;I':~'; $1 50'1600 ,I lilL.. i..L""~..-...,.-'..-.....~_4,',,, $150,000 SEWER SW234 SW256 SW260 SW26~ Sewer Improvements on Colorado Between J & K Robinhood Ranch II Pump Station Improvements Sewer Rehab for FY2009-1 0 Industrial Blvd. And Main Street Capacity Enhanc.ement SEWER TOTAL fil~;::;$7J7. 6oo'll~ ~t.,,;;______.....f '_...::::l:J ~~j.~fl''''''''''''''''''~'''''-''''!''~! lUm!!t!;!,~,49g_,.Q,Q.qMii;i 1'li'.!Ji'$30b"1'00bi:' .2~l1."~.....~,,_..'.,,..........J.J ji,li:;1'$J:4o;OO'Oi!'m _,..d...;.,';".,';"'....,M,~......'''.,~". $1,617,000 -203- .' - -- -..- -" - - q--,. -- ,- - ----,~ -.' -- - ~- ---'1 r'";,, ,~;;. ;<~:,'_. 11~,M~J;t,,-\b}'~P~~~~~'~~~N~~B:~!~C~~~,._,; _,' ,:.. -.: "::' '..'- f<..'~;-'~:.'l~ '.c~, ~:~j,-_:~Jli1f!:ging;S~~fi1a"y,:liY'Ptd{~9;rrIJ!O~: ~;:~:-;-~ ' '" '< ~ .;.- '_~_.:-. TRAFFIC Traffic Count Station and Maintenance Traffic Signal Installation at Second Avenue and Quintard Street Citywide Traffic Count Program Traffic Monitoring Program Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program Traffic Signal Modification, Fourth & Main, Fourth & Beyer Traffic Signal Modification, Third & Montgomery Signing and Striping Program Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Program I-80S Direct Access Ramp East H & East Palomar Traffic Calming Program Traffic Signal System Optimization Traffic Congestion Relief Program Olay Mesa Transportation System SR54 Corridor and Arterial Operations Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Upgrade and Modification Program Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive and Main Street TRAFFIC TOTAL TF274 TF316 TF321 TF325 TF327 TF330 TF331 TF332 TF337 TF344 TF345 TF350 TF354 TF356 TF359 TF362 TF366 TF370 TF371 $3,150,000 GRAND TOTAL - ALL PROJECTS $30,443,302 -204- p R E o o s p E D B u D G T SUMMARY TABLES Fund Appropriations by Department and Expenditure Category Schedule of Revenues Fund Balance Projections Schedule of Interfund Transfers Authorized Positions by Department -205- PROPO fF~SCAl SlED YIEAR BUD G 2 ij 0 9 FUND APPROPRIAT~ONS DEPARTMENT AND EXPENDITURE CATEGORY -207- E T 1 o BY "'''''~--'<- n, , i<' ;>'1<' " <, :', ", ~;: ,\;~,,;~ "~""~ r:" ~, ..' " ,;,: r; '}' '" ,,",' ';. .. , ~L ,,0., ,j- l"l " , < : ::~l'?(: ';.~;,~;~{ ,:' '\\. <,./ ',0,,;/1' : ... :~:..,,/ " ,~. ' " , ': :: ~ ' ; , ,," " , ." < Jr;;::::-~I:,; ,:'!f ";'::"'!',,, , \~:::~~;~!, ,~'" ' i <'i ',,1 >':' '; ~~,l, I ~ , :"ti:' ,:,!,,::: ,<":~~';~~~':, -.--,_.-: ',1(.' <, ,::'1:<,::,;11 '","";', >,-'" ,,)':f~~;';', "" 'Y, '.' ;;~~': ,:,~:',::i')':ll ',:!":<: ".' ,:'i:;';::::,:'r~" , .' I f: '~::: ::':'~);/;11: :::,~! , " j 1'> I tl;):': j 1, "t~~~' 1;IJ ~I:"l:';;< "" "(f,, "'!....< 'I! l'l'i ._ "' ,,,..1. ~, -' , I "I "~, ':;d::::::; ':;~1:l<~~':' ":{il,i~, I ":';:~"" '<~, -<<.,'...;, J' -, ,-, ' .; n , . i, ;::,;";,,",;','!::,:..,,~,;,;:':i~::";:',':;,,~; - '. - l:'(:fl( ',! ' ' . " > ,'C;;;;;: I' " ',' , :;,:' !';;:;'~~ ~l; :' " ,.:, ",: t: ;:.::':,;, ,:~,~~f:iRJi:J';":",;: 1:, I . ,t~""'<,k' ,," ,,,,' r;:;:::;:.,1';';:};'~0:':,: ,~,:};~:~':: 1. 'il-.:': "';:::::;;;;~:;'~f"" '\1"" ' h, , " !:- :'!if I,' ~ ' , l l' I ,.;,: ,:,' :' !" .'::')<::;1'.. ': ,"l;1 i" , ',"- '/'~''''' " "'I"l ~i;;:~~;~;,fi~j, ',-< , ,-sr II<tl'.',ll ,<,1'1', 1-" ",,' ,""'i' i' ""':11"::1' ',ii' .",,' 'I [,~;::~i;:,,':;::::;':,:.ip;.g;: })';:,[:':;::I ,>:1',,'" "', , l,t ...., j'HD' """"""i ,. ,'I' '-':''- \i ','. " ~"+ ,. ~;., '. .,... . -. ",' - ." . ,,::;., : (:,f,~.,,: f~:~RQPO~~.'?:~~r~ND~'f.UR~~;!,~Y D.E~ARTMEI~H / (:ATEG.<)RY 'j '. . , :''- ;,$. .:' /, 'j' .". 'C,,', 'Fiscal Year2009 - 201-0' \ .' .' '.' ~..o . _ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~ 0_ ~ ".. ". _ _ _ ~ ...A~ __ 01100 City Council 86,248 02000 Boards and Commissions 14,736 03000 City Clerk 683,789 366,921 844 04000 C'ty Attorney 1,524,013 445,805 1,560 05000 Administration 1,580,098 145,612 1,770 06000 ITS 2,327,914 660,156 57,479 100,000 07000 Human Resources 2,107,601 1,747,310 3,367 08000 Finance 2,975,784 183,871 4,365 09000 Non-Departmental (621,675) 180,080 0 652,321 8,688,551 10000 Gen Svcs/AnimaJ Care Facility 1,740,468 592.779 62,778 2,429 12000 Planning & Building Services 3,473,883 489,262 13,653 130,730 14000 Police 40,587,231 2,821,823 421,806 81,669 , 15000 Fire 19,021,737 1,831,373 202,473 172,216 N 16000 Public Works 19,177,012 3,668,049 3,371,365 179.175 0 If' 17000 Recreation 3,586,956 549.961 476,349 3,817 18000 Library 3,877,859 881,802 374,697 357 100 GENERAL FUND TOTAL 103,173,440 14,665,788 4,993,950 1,050,498 100,000 8,860,767 221 Gas Tax 3,869,200 225 Traffic Signal 15.000 1,067,000 227 Transp Sales Tax Fund 1,429 11,911,875 231 Workers Compensation 539.840 2,919,019 232 Flexible Spending 'Account 310,000 236 Development Serv ces Fund 4,606,280 131.008 5,957 8,488 1.079,559 241 Parking Meter 8,668 225,636 19,487 165,940 120,000 245 Traffic Safety 4,000 534,140 251 Supp Law Enforcement Serv fun 111,406 252 Parce Dept Grants Fund 2,638,866 362,282 5,602 329,621 253 Inmate Welfare Fund 20,000 254 Local Law Enf Block Grant Pro 199,938 24,922 256 Asset Seizure 100,125 261 CA Library Services Act 25,000 102,644 267 McCandliss Memorial Cult Arts 400 1,200 272 Federal Grants Fund 101,335 62,320 169,904 95,000 ",,-,...,.-""''''" ~,464: )4ic3.~ ~O~1_~~j)~ . ,971.J!,9:" : :.~(t?7480 ~cS1~_M!i6~; ~858~?79" 7;:i;!64~oio} _~~~.Q'177 ;:::'2:~911)54.J D.,,4)Q.7-:-527~ :, "-43.91 2!>2TJ :-~2 !:2-2~ ~~s:- 1':26,395322 , ri;;r:~iE 132,844,443 e.3"a69,~oo:g ;~1,Q~?,Q.9.o . . iI,913,3Q1 : ~~~~~JI~~ >~,~1~?91:' . .,:):i9~t~.i ~~~{lH~~~ r~~~~;~~0~ C<..-,,,,,.,...._" _ .ce, i~-;; 224,~6Q~ ~--'o-_'" ,_ ._._.......... ~1'i::..::.1 OO;125~ ~[~~?t~~~1~ " 1-600 ~:~t:;2~559:'. :~~ ~~~r~"~r;'; ': ~J{!3P~S:~P-:i:~PE~~.IT~:RES' '~Y~ar:~~~'fM'~NJ l CATEGORY,,' .,.. ". .' :: . ::' . :t." ,,~.:,. ;'; .. FiscaIYear2009-2010. , ~ ,,. _..3 ~. . , .,. . ~ "- ~. . _ __ _ " ? 274 281 282 285 301 311 313 314 315 317 321 333 341 342 343 344 345 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 361 362 363 364 365 367 368 369 371 ARRA Fund Waste Mgmt & Recycling Environmental Seryices Energy Conservation Storm Drain Revenue COBG Housing Program CV Housing Authority Emergency Shelter Grant Prog RDA Housing Program Redev Low & Mod Income Housin HOME Program CDBG FYOO Public Liability Trust CFD 11.M RHR McMillin CFD 12-M Otay Ranch Village 7 CFD 13M Otay Ranch Village 2 CFD 12M Otay Ranch Village 7 Bay Blvd Landscape Dist Eastlake Maintenance Dist 1 Open Space 0 strict #1 Open Space District #2 Open Space District #3 Open Space District #4 Open Space District #5 Open Space District #6 Open Space District #7 Open Space Distr'ct #8 Open Space District #9 Open Space District #10 Open Space District #11 Open Space District #14 Open Space District #15 Open Space District #17 Open Space Distri~t #18 50,139 405,224 62,617 828,806 298,203 599,511 37,887 256,850 51,400 42,800 227,280 12,723 38,000 82,687 283,221 200 305,003 2,060 230,772 55,964 8,911 18,600 57 202 43,680 16,705 5,555 42,322 42,737 49,360 111,311 206,451 20,339 5,100 64,616 805 581 15,540 128,000 142,220 6,967 82,501 26,158 3,982 17,405 23,631 12,342 9,427 4,761 20,884 25,057 22,018 39,033 124,850 8,179 560 46,596 627 24,592 8,000 20,000 451,304 95,221 795,146 290,463 96,000 400,000 55 156,569 4,394 83,804 1,192,000 81,000 361,701 1,800,000 12,381 71,569 4,017 74,500 5,846 59,687 15,200 2,691 7,622 13,952 10,382 5,544 3,183 11,183 13,090 12,562 27,847 56,432 5,843 2,088 19,285 3,920,000 115,569 7,000 768,471 1,461,550 6,000 604,922 ~',~;;:81i738~~ "'o.~.2_,,-',.._~~ ~-illt~~ ~~'-.--"""'-'-'.' ,",'1;:548;1)~;f ~, 54,7,400::; fY", -1 028 '23'0;:; '". _".___' .t I: ~8.8:19.8~ IC' '3,920,000" ""~'''~'<''''-''-'--'.'-'"'-'' it~:;~I~;i ~t:t~~t~ r;: 11,q,,60B-, k;,;:i.482,790 :' ~;l~j r;::NJ~2" ! ',__ ".1 5,5843 : _~::-[4~'627-:; E:\. ~;_~~it~= i~;,,~~,~04:; ~t~~~;~~~~] EJ:~-;;;:1;(389~, ~:~~~~884~ 11-"-,,,,-j83,~~ , t ",' 1 z8~191S f!I~H:~~ e::.:.: 1.36;~i': ,., ".':';" "r:" ,:,PRORO"SEq,'ExPE'NDiJURES'BVjJEPARTNfENT /CATEGORY"'.--'-'- --,'co' 1;'.! . ~., _ ~~ 3 f)> . o. . , . .: -' . ~ ... " ."h':,!'4-;".:i;,.V''''.!..:':',~, ::.,....,~.,'i: "y ::F1~ca/,f.~i!r2q~9-~{J!O., _> , __ .' ,', , , 372 Open Space District #20 844,804 307.678 203,580 373 Open Space District #23 39,759 8,665 9,409 374 Open Space District #24 12,007 11,395 4,465 375 Open Space District #26 6,898 3,031 2,706 376 Open Space District #31 71,921 46,211 21,071 378 CFD 07M-Eastlk II Woods. Vista 321,615 128,171 166,090 379 CFD 08M,Vlg 6 McM & Oty Ranc 491,088 246,913 197,010 380 CFD 09M.OR Vlg II Brookftd She 567,530 204,146 154,864 382 CFD 99-2 Olay Ranch Vlg 1 West 458,855 155,228 106.014 386 Otay Ranch Preserve 829,241 42,024 387 CFD 98-3 Sunbow 2 656,543 206.764 148,285 388 Community Facility Os! 97-1 OR 1,526,637 385,292 328,012 389 Otay Ranch Village 1,2,6,7,12 58,354 29,561 17,001 ri 391 Central Garage Fund 910,174 3,122,228 1,800 400 108,000 ,. 391 Equipment Replacement 18,326 500 64,200 393 Technology Replacement 7,382 401 Bayfront Trolley Station TDA 57,000 19.000 26,679 402 Transit CVT 356,365 745,895 185,030 256,059 92,321 413 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 917,000 414 Sewer Service Revenue 3,980,787 19.151,821 6,961 6.831 575,958 3,263,737 115,000 428 Sewer Facility Replacement 174,258 700.000 431 Tele Gyn Sewer Basin DIF 35,000 432 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DIF 10,000 433 Salt Creek Sewer BaSIn DIF 74,091 250,000 441 1994 Pension Obligation Bond 2,500 2,506,688 442 CDBG Section 108 Loan 734.471 446 Notes Payable Adamo Property 48,113 448 2000 COP Ser A-Fin Project 5,000 1.862,522 449 SD Co Regional Comm Systems 295,734 450 2002 COP Police Facility Proj 5,000 3,910,746 451 Long-term Advances DSF-City 300,000 5,300,000 452 KS Fire Equipment Capital Lease 172,216 453 CES Loan Repayment 194,000 471 2003 Refunding Cert of Part 5,700 1,065,066 l$iR,f""T".><..-.....'?1 ,:!""q~<3.,Q22.:.:J ~::~;~.~f:i~~ -..,,,. -. -..,. --~ .~, ~~,;:1;:T?'(~3511 Ellf1-3~i?~j E~-::615:876'"1 ii;~f~~~~9~IT~ ~ i%~:~10~~! ",' 720.097" ~::"-8i1l65 ~ t~?1:01X,592~. I' c 2 - "9' - ,,;;_,21~,__41.-.: 1'''7;;: 104,9'16' ~'~-"""'" -"'~-'" ~_1iT42c,~0.3 ~ ~' ;"'",,8..3,02~ ~ ~:i~j:,~:~7~lli ~'~:~~~~~~ ":,~:~91 t, biiili' .-"~"._....--._->'<.~ ~'27:10{095" t~.~8j~.~8S '::;: .-,35,0,90:' ~".i'1~:OOO-= L -"32~:Q9.:t::: [ill6_~'c~~J k;7:"::..(~.4)~Q r'i"~:Z~}1{33 ;:!;,:.1,86i:5?D ti{~~i~;~~~_~ r::'::-5,\i,qo:Dg,o,;; ~~~~l~~~ "-:: .1;9:70-;766', ~ .. ~. ...." '.. Q . ., . - ~ - - - ~ . ...~~ j :',~-;:ij',(i~',';':I.P~gPq~J:D.~~P,Ia~pl.!rU~.ES',BY D,~PA~\fMEN;r I LAf;EGQR,Y " " , _h... ?", :.. , . ; FIscal Year:20mJ". 201'0' , >~ " . A~ _, _ _... ~ _ ~, ~ _ _ ~. _ _ _ 472 2004 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase I 473 2006 COP Civ Ctr Proj Phase 2 515 Twin Oaks Ave AD 96-1 Imprvmnt 3,680 516 Oxford St Ad 97-1 Improvement 3,854 518 AD2005-1 Tobias Drive 60,000 542 Tele Cyn Drainage DIF 1,250,000 567 PFDIF-Adamo Prop Acquisition 48,113 572 PFDIF - Civic Center Expansion 2,392,502 573 Police Facilities Remodel 1,736,633 574 Corporation Yard Relocation 1,098,290 587 Otay Ranch VLG Ped Ramp DIF 43,000 588 OR VIg11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF 3,200 591 Transportation DIF 211,000 580,916 5,300,000 2,845,000 ~ 611 RDA Town Center I/Bayfront 318,750 400 690,558 3,617,293 875,000 'C' 651 So WestITwn etr II/Oty Vly Prj 612,947 310,700 100 2,358,248 5,946,932 150,000 653 RDA 2008 TARBs Project Fund 800,000 689 2000 TABS (Merged Rda Project) 515,000 691 Long-term Advances DSF - RDA 1,405,000 2,782,842 693 05 Tax Rev Bnd A (eRA/ERAF L 100,569 694 06 Tax Rev Bnd A (eRA/ERAF L 125,632 695 06 Sr Tax Alloc Ref Bond Ser A 5,000 1,068,545 696 06 Sub Tax Alloc Ref Bond SerB 5,000 1,045,199 697 08 Tax Allocation Refunding Bond 963,636 715 Park Land Acquisition Fund 25,000 2,000,000 717 Resident. ConstrucUConver Fnd 679,242 723 Bicycle Facilities Fund 266,220 736 Other Transportation Programs 1,402,000 3,690,234 739 Traffic Congestion Relief Fun 348,000 741 Prop 18 Highway Safety 3,385,407 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 118,356,993 49,113,818 7,727,919 33,612,108 1,853,808 55,197,467 30,443,302 150,000 150,000 2,396;117 :1 ,- .."..::.,;,'71 8',:199" c6[O~ -i.:j)'~"iJ ~C<6O:00o;! G~?25o.'o66~ [l~:ti~::ll@~ ~"'2:~i2:5~f~ :;'1,n6,63) ~~;~{1 :Q.98;?jp ~ ~F:,:;.:i3~609j ;::,< _ ~,20Q.; t~f~93~~16' :"::5,6,52,OQ1. ~~:~;rt'9',528,927~~ t.;:::'.:"" 8000~ ~'..=>L...' ~.. -' ,.~......-. ~:~l,~~fffi f ':"1i!Q,56~" ; .-:'12'5,632"', ;;;::::'"-.''''-::::7'~7~':-;;; ~.~:J,073;~4,?ij [~~1;g5Q~g9ii f,~i7:-96~,6.36~ r;;::C02~dQo"c tt;ye:61~,i1~ ~.J6E,~2}O~ ", 5,092,234, I' ~;!131~,q,OQij E:~~3,38,~,~ :; 2,640,500 298,945,913 ,O!1"'tt7 ;;':;"" ~'J A~, 711":'~.!t II "!~";"~'I,j 'I'" l'l !;, Ii "::r:~1 11' ill ~l4.....,l:; iii :.;""i,'gi" t 'j'r !h~;V!' /"-,\ PR.OPOSIED BIUDGIET IF~SCAIL VIEA~ 2009-~ij SCHIEDUllE OF REVIENUIES -213- '~:. ~,: < <, - {'c ~, - ',~E'4 '~.; .~ -;"~, -""~~" " ;p , ~'~~.' "p..,~.~.~. , y}'- -tv "-r't;.;-" ,'" "r " , " ,~,)rJ"~' v~ !:, ;,,..........,,Jlt , "L'~ll'" ":-~--t;r: f ;_ '\J4" It ;<:' ' i',;;'J!J:'!" t., ;~ ",,:,W. .',-;J'R . . ',-i:"nlJ'':'"'' '~" ~" ': " ,'~ .-, I.: . . :',"~' ""?','~>'I.,~."~" :' .:....x..."$CHE'OU1EOF.REVENU'ES' ' " , .,':':. 100 GEN'ERAE FI!.INO'" '.,', :.: "',' ", ' 30.0.0. 30.10. 30.20. 30.30. 30.40. 30.50. 30.70. " 'f' 310.0. 3120. 3140. 320.0. 3210. 3240. 3250. 330.0. 3310. 3320. 3330. Properly Taxes Property Tax TOTAL 22,192,789 26,667.759 $22,192,789 $26,667,759 26,715,515 28,827,392 9,492,759 8,813,064 6,363,446 6,981,762 1,234,912 1,237,316 2,336,20.4 2,551,570. 2,122,860. 1,423,599 $48,265,696 $49,834,703 117,381 129,833 2,697,584 2,198,700. 40.1,576 402,0.0.1 $3,216,541 $2,730,534 458,749 536,687 168,90.0 261,611 30.7,647 30.2,480 208,893 214,484 $1,144,189 $1,315,262 279,277 769,851 361 0. 11,182 51,844 123,365 10.5,60.6 Other Local Taxes Sales Tax Franchise Fees Utility Taxes Business License Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Real Property Transfer Tax TOTAL Licenses and Permits Licenses Dev I Improvement Permits Re9ulatory Permits TOTAL Fines. Forfeitures. Penalties Community Appearance Penalties Law Enforcement Penalties Parking Penalties Other Penalties TOTAL Use of Monev & Prooertv Investment Earnings Sale of Real Property Sale of Personal Property RentallLease of Equipment 29,30.6,623 1,,;:::;-29,232:()()5][, '["2'1f1SS"."440] $29,306,623 $29,232,000 $27,199,440 28,304,989 9,662,517 7,378,30.1 1,237,322 2,697,286 795,606 $50,076,021 123,393 2,0.51,184 522,760. $2,697,337 690.,194 299,199 308,250 222,074 $1,519,717 1,255,159 154 54,549 91,175 1.:...::..26:890DDQjL '; ,-'25:545,50o.J ~:()330()Olr ,:';q(),D3~60DJ l~, .:7~LOQ2JL:8;1~ 144J r'? ,1;T96,DDo:lI ,'1'(1, 190:600.1 t . ;"'2;57D,DD.2:::fv' 2;602,51:;0 ~''''m402"'[~;~i414D2'' ',> > "~~-,,.. $48,946,402 $48,381,560 L,,:,:::...,~,O~l :: ' )32,6DQ.J ,~~-,;,,<~,~-_.,,- "''''":n':'~~-:-:r-'-'T>C'''''-~-''''''':'' I' ,"" ,159,931:;,1, '. ",227,220. j !',' ;,"';:530;2!J.Ut':': . ',52D,DDo.j $820,283 $879,820 ''''';1';477 ,3421 , ',"}?6,55,0] ..:99Bf :7'326",'40.01 ,,' 178,jlOD ;IL"'. 219,40D,j $2,231,468 $2,379,692 :-M'i:W5:364 ~ , , 0.:] _~;",,"~.~.'"c.l '-;:" 3D';'@0 ", .:80.,94,0. ,. ';'" ,,~. ", '" '. ' . '". 'sC'::HnJUL-E OF REVENUES .' ,.---:'., -,- --: ~~- ~ 'I' 3010 3400 3440 3460 3470 3480 3500 3580 3600 3690 3700 3720 3730 3740 3770 3800 3820 3830 3840 3900 3950 3970 4200 4300 Rental/Lease of Land and Space Rental/Lease of Buildings TOTAL Revenue from Other Aaencies Sales Tax State Grants State Tax Sharing Motor Vehicle License Fees State Subvention-Booking Fees State Reimbursements Federal Grants Federal Reimbursements Other Agency Grants Other Agency Revenue TOTAL Charaes for Services Zoning Fees Document Fees Plan Checking Fees Inspection Fees Other Dev Fees Animal Shelter Contracts Information Systems Services Services to the Port District Youth Center Utilities Reimb Recreation Program Fees Class Admi?sion Fees Referral Fees Staff Services Reimbursements Fees for Other Services 777,551 797,928 275,999 18,354,839 305,049 773,879 2,656,964 97,138 46,110 1,330,798 $25,416,255 8,162,093 45,301 1,951,512 168,880 16,595 8,930 12,114 544,810 35,181 836,950 360,164 68,902 1,999,799 1,023,739 779,959 347,927 278,746 17,676,035 o 139,729 4,112,263 115,352 148,733 1,333,531 $24,932,275 8,391,778 30,378 1,907,116 162,324 31,276 257,120 3,362 690,963 20,918 1,157,313 558,680 359,849 1,993,134 694,876 757,366 1,329,998 288,071 19,796,531 o 4,201 1,686,842 65,394 401,298 1,704,993 $26,034,694 6,196,145 73,680 1,429,625 208,203 11,840 683,392 1,541 675,378 20,262 1,011,959 530,402 347,876 2,110,668 1,170,099 $4,058,523 r~7~i,07f Ie ~69o.,'Z,171 !.,' " " .~81,9-i41"~ , '441',0601 i',",.'t 282,800:11- ".,'1;;271,488'1 ""-,~-"""",<"",-"-",,,-,--,",>,,-,;~-~...,-,,..,,-,,--,---...I;;.I (:_~81~[.'~~B-637] t-.~ ~"';fm_ .0 Ill';, "-:r::oJ ,.. , I ' , 6934'11--- .. ' '3 9..~5:1 L"..~,"':~-:._":-:"",,,,'...........;....;;< ''':;"c.~_,;:+.,,:,,~_; ,- ~:<,,~_.-~."'._" ,.,..-----.,...~---::_'l i ',; ,1,60.9,24 ,,-1,239,726 I -64,,100 $24,740,682 $21,021,968 !;~~i44.7'f1:1F~492~3381 E'" ,,',~5,3831r: .4fill.:J ':"'f': I, 88,407:J ",,' ,156,9041 ,,,,,"'" .. '~---.......;"h">"....----..-.,,,,,,, ";'," "f1Too 1'96,428 o \ TO. - 0 __ _ _ __ : ", ," ;. ' ~';" '0 ; : ., "SCHEDULE OFREVENUIiS ' , , ' ;: . J' . _ ~ _ _ -" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~_ TOTAL Other Revenue 4410 OIF Reimbursements 4420 Transit Heimbursements 4430 Redev Agency Reimbursements 4440 Open Space/Assess Oist Reimb 4450 CIP Reimbursements 4460 COBG/Home Reimbursements 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4600 Assessments 4700 Collection Charges 4800 Sale of Goods 4900 Other Revenue ,(, TOTAL -;.J Transfers In 5221 Tlr In from Gas Tax Fund 5236 Tlr In from Oev Services Fund 5245 Tlr In from Traffic Safety 5256 Tfr In from Asset Seizure Fund 5261 Tlr In from CA Library Service 5262 Tlr In from Public Library 5282 Tfr In from Environmental Serv 5294 Tfr In from Sewer Service Rsrv 5301 Tlr In from Storm Drain Rev 5313 Tfr in from CV Hsng Authority 5333 Tlr In frm COBG 5391 Tfr In from Central Garage 5392 Tfr In from Equip Replacement 5393 Tlr In from Tech Repl Fund 5395 Tfr In from Central Stores $15,234,970 1,359,035 762,460 4,406,759 1,822,198 4,333,556 1,567,320 2,614,407 3,693 150,673 57,385 2,489,702 $19,567,188 3,858,092 o 527,984 o 74,612 70,647 o 8,581,664 1,357,355 147,000 232,235 31,188 2,400,000 1,000,000 o $16,259,087 1,334,226 820,427 4,319,107 1,783,469 5,024,531 1,275,441 1,760,684 3,695 220,912 80,677 2,166,646 $18,789,815 4,167,878 o 513,600 134,341 70,670 128,454 o 9,056,172 309,690 o o 32,124 o o o $14,471,070 840,313 362,818 1,984,951 2,067,069 4,665,576 1,053,480 1,567,531 3,694 256,155 72,524 4,315,062 $17,189,173 4,269,058 o 534,144 o 29,110 2,000 o o 238,528 o o 32,124 o o 71,313 ,~ $6,669,109 $7,546,077 '.. "316'5f13f,2'-'..,1287'176:! ---~,!....:....J-~"'--_'. .".." 262,38'01[:: ~258,747 J ';';,,::,"768,520 U,' :~~J ,::71,873:26' :997,1;J':J;: ':::..i.2946;98 ,..,~,2~ ,......T"'.~ .. . '-''''''- . >, ,::;402,274,,1 '" "" 28,188,J L.....Jl, ?J13.~L;.L _1:948~6m tl, ;w,;::' 36@b':~~"'ol ['.~.. ' 278:55QJ[.::.c-''200;~0'(J" l::.:J:~o1Jli, ~ ",:.:..:2.3501 r" -, -, -, -.""," ,,- =. ":',;'.'2,505;693 ~L" ":1,508,~86 't $12,158,554 $11,435,961 Lcr.-4,269,2~r:;:-:--3,~,,?@ C:,:.;J,~~2,~2~L"._.: 1,079;5~J r~"'-:::::5Wi 40 :lh:::;'-;' :534 .-141)"1 [' '.. :'120'o~6(j'21(:.. :.. '.. 0:'1 _~ ---'-"''"-1..------'--- __. 25:06 -2'5,000' .' .", c '~\" :.::.': ," :,-, ';.; SCHEDULE 'OF REVENUES . .~~ ",' d~' , - 5402 Tlr In from TransiUCVT Fund 5414 Tlr I n from Sewer Service Rsrv 5575 Tlr In from Lib East Territory 5611 Tlr In from RDA BFfTC I 5651 Tlr In from SWfTClI/OV proj 5691 Tfr In from L T Adv DSF.RDA 5714 Tfr In from CIP w/Fiscal Agent 5723 Tlr In from Bike Facilities Fd 5733 Tlr In from Swr Facility Repl TOTAL 119,767 0 0 0 0 4,560,008 2,154,748 4,000,000 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 391,311 0 0 31,734 0 0 281,079 267,053 0 $21,274,416 $18,679,982 $9,736,285 $11,058,308 $12,219,604 $157,809,965 $161,564,721 $153,938,093 $139,915,329 $132,844,444 TOTAL -100 GENERAL FUND <1 9' 220 TRANSPORTATION FUNDS' . "- . -' " ~ 3010 3300 3440 3500 3770 4440 4450 5000 Sales Tax Investment Earnings State Tax Sharing Federal Grants Other Dev Fees Open Space/Assess Dist Reimb CIP Reimbursements Transfers In 4,200,000 526,006 3,984,265 (13,096) 1,895,618 o o 21,694 $10,614,487 TOTAL - 220 TRANSPORTATION FUNDS 3300 3760 230 . DEVELOPER DEP'OSITS ..' Investment Earnings Other Dev Fees 3,210.000 875,065 4,075,451 67,657 683,742 6,000 5,517 o $8,923,432 9,171,000 1,082,504 4,036,861 238,500 499,457 1,351 o o r~:.-;-'(5n;oaolr:'.' 1.1,827,655 i ['. ,H ./OJL~."-ol ,>,,,,,,,,,,-,,,,<,...-..._~,",,,,,,,.,.. .- "~-'<'--~;"'''-'' r~~:c:i"1~2:'7'161F,, G;.7~2')I6\ r' . ;"::',. 'Q'1[1' , N ; .. .0' j L~":':_.,.~".".,,..>~,-/.'..J . ,.."',......,,~,.,..,,,>,.~,.,_,,' [":'755Y2'41'][i'i "'2'50:0061 ;'"<'",, Ii. _ _,.,. -', t. ,-". .1 ,_< [....::.:. -0;1!;,,: :. ;' :0.1 ' ,-" _"~9"_'>""--"''',,_,,~, "_ "~""""",,,~"'<>_,'_,",-Ow.....;,d l~:~. ~..~ ~:~lS~:..T~:]~~ t: ._.................DtL. ~.,......... $9,270,957 $15,820,371 $15,029,673 TOTAL - 230 DEVELOPER DEPOSITS $0 o o o o $0 249,790 [-., ~. .li.~gJ!L. 2.,,0'] 12,244,884 r::::-:-:;~';;?O~r ;;'--:;'...-;-"0"':] $12,494,674 $0 $0 . . -.. -. .,. -- SCHEDULE Of REV'ENUES' - - . .. - -, - : ---- - , ~ - - - - - , -. ~ -. - ^ --- - --- - ,~ 231 VvORKERS"COMPENSA:i:'ioN': ~; - ,', ,': . ,;', 4480 4900 Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue 0 5,168 2,490,139 2,899,423 $2,490,139 $2,904,591 259.359 276,064 $259,359 $276,064 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 TOTAL.231 WORKERS COMPENSATION '23;1 IFLEXIBLE SPENpING'ACCOUNW - ;', - :'; " 4900 Other Revenue TOTAL ,232 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT 233 TAX REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES , 3300 4900 Investment Earnings Other Revenue " 'P TOTAL.233 TAX REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES 4,703 ~,h,'50:0Qii)'jr..)-" '-50,QQQj 3,045,598 g:'2,7,7,1,~'1TIIl"', ,2;-?7,Pj'j1J $3,050,301 $2,821,917 $2,821,917 265,866 F:l,;;, 31 0;000. J,", 'fc' ..'310;0001 $265,866 $310,000 $310,000 1<':" . """7""" :ii71F"'C...".....-''''i'1'1I 5,408 L~,..~~.~:.,~ 127,586 p;;:.. ;:'":"0'11 ,',~'" ';~"":bl $132,994 $0 $0 '" :~.' ':., ,,' " " .," :,:.' SCHEDULE OF REVENUES. '~, . - ',- .- . ~ i ::iIl.':.' <I"...."i.l1"',L, '\ . o~'jg , 'A..,,,, ...".~"t _ .", _'_ __ __''__ ~. _ _ _" ~ '. _. _A. '236 'DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES 'J... , - - - " N '? 3120 3600 3700 3720 3730 3740 3770 4200 4410 4430 4440 4450 4460 4480 4900 5000 Dev /Improvement Permits Other Agency Grants Zoning Fees Document Fees Plan Checking Fees Inspection Fees Other Dev Fees Staff Services Reimbursements DIF Reimbursements Redev Agency Reimbursements Open Space/Assess Dist Reimb erp Reimbursements CDBG/Home Reimbursements Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue Transfers In o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o $0 TOTAL.236 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 240 PARKING - " : 3160 3240 3300 3350 4390 5000 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o $0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o $0 $7,226,744 $5,858,031 Other Permits Parking Penalties Investment Earnings Rental/Lease of Land and Space In Lieu Parking - TC I Transfers In 34.083 59,668 4,982 260,226 o 1,908 $360,867 TOTAL - 240 PARKING 24,729 60,047 9,575 237,334 o o $331,685 23,209 73,339 11,051 238,611 16,160 o $362,370 :: .:.::3J~9Q1iJL.:_:~,OOQJ:I , '~276;o53jr;-:-:-:;7134~126l r ,- ojl ' ',-L - -OQ] ,;;,. , " ;1" ". .;;. '.- I,,"' ~ -- ..,-"...~._".._~._. ;-.,'.-"'-, ....:... ------",.~lj;:i1:9.:.;;L:~: 3~6~oOol . ,.0"T--;:;,' L ' ~-- 6] . :9;!i., "i>~' : gj $361,772 $568,126 ,'.', ";~,,~". . . '.: . ' ~ "SCHEDULE OF REVE~8ES . . . '.'. . - , .~. . ... -"_ _~ A~ _ ." ..... ~ .~~. '" ._~ ___ ~_'" __. ________ 250 PLJ~(IC SAFE'TV. " ',' '''. . . : 3210 law Enforcement Penalties 3300 Investment Earnings 3350 Rental/lease of land and Space 3400 State Grants 3500 Federal Grants 3690 Other Agency Revenue 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In 517,504 842,214 1,056,790 ,,4~, 14,654 36,079 71,684 0 0 0 485,752 0 434,864 122,887 191,549 2,281,967 187,034 234,461 415,807 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 $1,327,831 $1,404,303 $4,261,112 $5,409,337 $4,510,845 TOTAl,250 PUBLIC SAFETY " ~ ~60 LIBRARY/CULTURAL ARTS' . . . 3300 3400 3440 3500 4900 Investment Earnings State Grants State Tax Sharing Federal Grants Other Revenue 5,349 141,195 156,714 7,500 900 $311,658 TOTAl,260 L1BRARY/CUl TURAl ARTS 270 SUNDRY, GRANTS . 3300 3400 3500 4480 4900 5000 17,088 22,049 188,086 0 198,269 91,215 1,875 0 900 0 $406,218 $113,264 . ~:"""::Q:L ";~QJ I.k.:.... :..:.-;.. ....':~,.9JL }: ";"";:...,~.92J '~.- ""iooo r,,""'l:'1os:oool ' t......, :"';' Q;] .":':'..20q] $134,900 $105,900 Investment Earnings State Grants Federal Grants Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue Transfers In o 408,213 o 668,906 o 143,469 $1,220,588 TOTAl,270 SUNDRY GRANTS (37) 324,533 129,560 o o o $454,056 o 1,342,385 237,957 o 23,824 13,672 $1,617,838 $983,717 $1,388,297 '"'., < " ,'~...:. ,:. ~ . :\'"<SCHEDUL'E OF REVENUES . ,,:- . - - -^ - - - ~ -- 280 ~CONSERVATION ": .' . : 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 4300 4480 4900 Investment EarnIngs State Grants Federal Grants Other Agency Grants Zoning Fees Fees for Other Services Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue (111) 356,927 8,626 o o o 12,867 o TOTAL - 280 CONSERVATION $378,309 " " \' 301 STORM DRAIN REVENUE ' ' A _ _ . 3120 3230 3300 4020 4200 5000 Dev I Improvement Permits Environmental Fines Penalties Investment Earnings Storm Drain Fees Staff Services Reimbursements Transfers In 190,989 3,500 9,734 519,172 184 2,232 TOTAL - 301 STORM DRAIN REVENUE $725,811 1,387 (44,084) o 211,620 o o o o $168,923 115,163 9,300 (1,095) 548,360 o o $671,728 o 311,556 o 932,951 o o 2,243 2,786 $1,249,536 47,303 21,700 1,268 570,070 o o $640,341 $3,438,427 $2,119,170 r;";""13g:g;f5;~~:;-:'-;::25 Goal ~Jri~~:*:IOlL:-;:'~--;j;rr~~~<.:".6Ji L. ,,' :.~. .....;Q]' l... ~i..:...9 : L'~':"'<<17.151'" '" ,500060:;1 ;;;L;m:..-} ..::-; ;_,~;,~,_..L;.J,;...:LL~~,;--,-,-! ,......"",: FJ~~~r~":S2~I~ $580,660 $525,000 'b -" ': \.. ',., . . _ _ ~ . ~., : i',' '. : >' .:" 'SCHEDt'lLE OF REVENUI1S . '. ' . .. .. . ~ - - - ~ '- - - - -- -- 310 HOUSING PROGRAM' . ;' , " .' ~ ,- 3000 3300 3310 3350 3700 4300 4430 4460 4480 4900 5000 N '" \" Property Tax Investment ,Earnings Sale of Real Property Rental/Lease of Land and Space Zoning Fees Fees for Other Services Redev Agency Reimbursements CDBG/Home Reimbursements Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue Transfers In 1,968,228 156,381 o 31,294 o 42,047 o o o 10,020 4,038 TOTAL. 310 HOUSING PROGRAM $2,212,008 ,320 COMM DEV 'BLOCK GRANTS' ' 3300 Investment Earnings 3400 State Grants 3500 Federal Grants 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In 2,294,709 278,938 88.088 24,592 o 58,897 o o o 7,337 1,124 $2,753,685 2,758,665 493,834 41,604 20,866 32,367 63,083 352,934 273,013 o 142,436 o [:-::-2 696-5'8'O""!;,':"', ,7"" >:-:"~ O'j -"-'-r._,--",UU~~,,-<.- ~,_ e'f:j;f:T14~j3'r~-;:;j)1?;r.J7rJO:-~ F ' q=:23' '. .,,~ 0' ", '!"'~~3p~i$~ .&:IF__.__J r :~"'F 63 ';\421!J:,;""'''''63 '442 'j L~~.; "'_ ,-" - - ~ "'~ ."-.__ __r _., -, r ':":'572;QOOlr"'?':;6:io.60O: i !;. i'i:27l]OcilLzi" '.L356&t!J [r' '" ."" .'51!';",,''', '3000'0'] ;tf,'....o-_ "~,.;;;.,.\o;:;,..:;".,>,~,,,,,_..!...t.,,,,__;;.___',,,,,,,,",,,"__,, ~g~i~~~~:;~~~~;i $4,178,802 $3,900,931 $8,120,065 23,479 10,611 16,714 1,660,178 0 0 4,585,199 4,206,564 4,354,211 0 1,053 0 75 0 9,508,942 0 304,534 0 $6,268,931 $4,522,762 $13,879,867 $4,676,546 $3,870,965 TOTAL. 320 COMM DEV BLOCK GRANTS 5000 341 PUBLlCoLlABILlTY TRUST' " , o Transfers In TOTAL.341 PUBLIC LIABILITY TRUST $0 o $0 o b ~c:. .., r<B~: ) ,8.2Q",0@ $0 $0 $1.800,000 ~ ' - - ..- - - ~ . ,," r - . - ~ .' . _ _, , ~ __ , " ,', ~', ' . ' ,~.. SCH.EDULE OF REVENUES .', , ." - . - . . . ~ . M _ ___ _ _ _ _ ~_ ~ _ _ __ 350' OPEN'~~ACE D1s''r~lci " ""'CO:' . , 3300 4450 4600 Investment Earnings CIP Reimbursements Assessments 244,179 o 6,235,851 $6,480,030 483,662 o 7,022,578 552,998 29,880 7,541,213 $8,124,091 TOTAL. 350 OPEN SPACE DISTRICT $7,506,240 390 FLEET MANAGEMENT' '; " , ' "' _ I ." 3300 3320 4420 4480 4900 N '" t Investment Earnings Sale of Personal Property Transit Reimbursements Other City Funds Reimbursement Other Revenue f~0;r;:i':;J'foflr;j;F~:;:%:-Z~. ..0 'j Pi: ;;:t';;~;;1Jf~O;1P;J0L":\,:::~1?, 611 f'7"";'l0:475;403"!f. ',\>11;866:649.1 ~. .._~.--' . '..-.... . , -=- $10,475,403 $11,866,649 157,631 97,740 92,548 29,524 0 0 784,103 724,983 781,048 41,465 36,177 29,827 3,762,777 4,364,737 3,803,624 $4,775,500 $5,223,637 $4,707,047 $3,530,978 $3,987,770 TOTAL - 390 FLEET MANAGEMENT 3300 4900 393 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT ~_ , Investment Earnings Other Revenue 46,550 (2,026) 2,072 539,700 269,851 49,697 $586,250 $267,825 $51,769 1,277 2,331 2,174 159,984 121,963 109,951 $161,261 $124,294 $112,125 TOTAL - 393 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT 395 STORES INVENTORY . . ~ . 3300 Investment Earnings 4900 Other Reve~ue TOTAL - 395 STORES INVENTORY $0 $0 $0 $0 '. .. l~{, ,~," :;7:~~~" ..~, '." , " ;':! :-:'1' 'SCHEDULE Of REVENUES ' . ,: ,'~ ~ ...._ A _ . . _ . .' _ _ ___ ~ __. ._ __ _ ,400"TRANSIT ',;."", ;, :.-', " ' . - . . 3300 Investment Earnings 3400 State Grants 3690 Other Agency Revenue 4300 Fees for Other Services 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transfers In 78,606 167,735 184,751 4,190,049 3,677,603 5,303,878 0 0 74,640 2,526,486 2,433,007 1,660,821 0 131,967 316,059 23,523 0 0 $6,818,664 $6,410,312 $7,540,149 $1,727,168 $1,738,349 TOTAL.400 TRANSIT 410 SEWER " . ' . , - . . . N N '{' 3000 3300 3700 4000 4020 4040 4100 4410 4430 4440 4450 4460 4600 4700 4900 5000 Property Tax Investment Earnings Zoning Fees Sewer Fees Storm Drain Fees Industrial Waste Fees Pump Station Fees OIF Reimbursements Redev Agency Reimbursements Open Space/Assess Oist Reimb CIP Reimbursements COBG/Home Reimbursements Assessments Collection Charges Other Revenue Transfers In 150 614,598 o 26,150,042 o 9,190 27,806 o o o 135,622 o 6,076 303,802 o 4,689,364 $31,936,650 TOTAL - 410 SEWER o 1,339,325 o 28,100,484 o 7,775 20,307 o o o 113,524 o 1,938 257,948 o 755,579 $30,596,880 o 6,090,269 13,239 29,097,670 13 7,900 36,563 21,967 3,049 3,773 64,491 5,105 5,290 226,425 7,076 174,258 $35,757,088 lli~D[~~@l]b'rJ~ ',"!S'f;1 ;<-:,2.3 h"~1,09~~25l~Q9~ , ",,'';',::' :30,88.Qf][~,:',:10;880] ~'1'67;~~l~~752;348l ~.J:...., ,': '. ]][,'io., ' ;: 9 ~ f""'T.........,..,. _.~['.._.,~'1 ~. ~ "',",~:O _L /0 " 't"A~'O~ :,..," : h~: .qJ[ ..:.;,~ ,..:.::..0..1 ',l . ;;''4'5'66if1r;> .. :', " . .o"';,'j t,,.... ''';';'.-. ., _ ;:.J -<.". <:' . ~,-;" ". ,;.i ! ,.';~b".: ':,9JL ~.L,_~g J k:~~;[~i~:5:lp:~;l~~-_:.'<'~-Q;~ t, ';i~1QO,00gjt::' " .1"00:0"00] ,~-..r:l~::-::::rDlr: 7"'-'::,.~:0:1 ~: ".: ~;, C!.:lb.::::~.~~gJ ,:r:':!m~f'.':725TI66J fi;t:':" . ,,,,,',,lJ;1I;,,,,!: , :'K. ~0,1 ,.,.,.-..<>-"_______,~Itw..,~~~,.,.'"'_.._>,:J , .~":619:7.6i'f'!j[-!?1'74;258.1 $35,274,785 $31,403,277 ',; ;',,":-t...:.;:; ,~;':.. ;\~.;.:.~;,r ,";'CF~~"'~,:;J. 'rS'~,b~E'hi;I'i"i;: 'KP':'R'EV" EA~I-UErS- "',: ,; ,,' "-,. ."; :'" ,- ~.:- ,~', ';'~-. . . Of" ~ , ." f ~.~, a- ..-"~".. , ~'(;I I11ULI] \:.I . I~~ ' do" . ~'Alr",,-~~ :iI_... ".~ " _". :',..!'~J....-::'_ ""J~A" .&:; _il~ ~......... ~,~ <C..- "~_..)".,. ~._ ~?;. 'B_ ~ ~_ n ,__p'..,~: ,'- ___'__'~_ 3300 4350 - aGoT"SEWER' DII=:-'~',;J ~':>: "-'7 ~i' f:!W ~~ :., F~'J-:O;:, r ..:1 I ~ , _"'-0. ~ "II. _"A ... _ _ . ' II. ." _' 1'_ Investment Earnings Sewer / Drainage DIF TOTAL.430 SEWER DIF 3300 5000 ~440';:DS,-'CI:rYi,' "~' ,-~ :' , . 1r .'c;, "..; .,' ..' '''~.' '. . l . : :j, ~'_' :" . ." Investment Earnings Transfers In 289,715 1 ,516,499 $1,806,214 414,878 556,160 $971,038 465,134 539,136 " $1 ,004,270 " ';!O,' 220,290 $220,290 ,'" 0, ;'120,900 $120,000 TOTAL - 440 OS - CITY 479 'DS~'9VP:l'JBUCF.lNANCINJ3,,~~llHO~I~ ;" ,:., " " 'I' 3300 4900 5000 57 2,792,205 $2,792,262 60 2,724,679 $2,724,739 8 ,,9' , " 0" 3,855,348",:3:862,217;:,;'9:561,256 :' $3,855,356 $3,862,247 $9,561,256 Investment Earnings Other Revenue Transfers In TOTAL - 470 DS - CV PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY '500r: ASSESS DisT IMPR0VEMEf\fTS ,':. . .:' , :' 1_ ' _~ L .. _ .~ ~_~ ~'. 4; '_' ~.'. '. '. ~ _,' 3300 4340 4600 479,242 20,325,000 8,180,421 $28,984,663 613,854 o 9,500,218 $10,114,072 579,4 77 o 9,904,895 $10,484,372 ,....0 ",' "0, 1 0,M1,(iS3 ....-.,......",-",.';--".,"'--,--, '~W;~t: ,"" ~:Q> ;:::::.".,., ",',' -" :~:~::,:-,.".::O~ .'. .'10;4.12178, $10,412,178 $10,441,083 o Investment Earnings Transportation DIF Assessments TOTAL - 500 ASSESS DIST IMPROVEMENTS '542 'YELEGRAPHfeANv,ON DRAINAGEDW no -, ~'.... ; , - ,,~ '- ~_.-'--"'~ -- ---".;...: . "-- 3300 4350 5000 Investment Earnings Sewer / Drainage DIF Transfers In TOTAL - 542 TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF 54,158 95,694 125,171 2 72,175 54,165 $251,504 $149,861 145,256 259,977 537 537 1,801 0 $147,594 $260,514 103,734 o 28,874 $132,608 278,120 ',::, o o $278,120 j;,,,,'; "0 ...... ,0 2'8,472 $28,472 ()-,:j . ...<f':t8.472 $28,472 c<'/'-'" .'g:,,":.~:"", ;'>"{:,9,:::,~r(f .,',"<:'0 ' ,., '0 0: $0 -'i> "'0 " ::"~m;1:, ~,::;~j;~::::;jt~, ~:j;jj;~~g~:J;' i $0 ~,.C>;;~'l f'l=~'!, :..~~~{t,":';CiJ~:-. ...,' ~ ,.i}' .' ~,~,~ ,",:scIlEIDt3irfop:,REVE'I:'SIUES"',.y ".. ;o~,T 7-;;:-:-;-' :', :.~ '-:.~: ,"-~: l~i~.~ ~.Y._:..:::''J)'-.~~~~: ~='__i.... ~_..~~t''''' ~,...;_.~_':;~~ ...:_ '_~;"~c ,;,;;;..1____:_L~"'*' A':'_~'_~'::"" ~~. _:___~_:~~.._~'h--"-......J 560l''PIDSl'lI$ 'EAefitIJIESIDIF l"'{ !$t .'f'~:' n,f, ,..~~.';i"l'::i1" , ~,"" __"'_. _ ~~_ ""_' _.~1 3300 Investment Earnings 492,375 990,861 32.258 4330 Public Facilities DIF 17,934,536 2,130,561 2,861,465 4450 CIP Reimbursements 0 53,279 0 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 3,138,140 0 1,337,031 4900 Other Revenue 25,179 795,036 0 5000 Transfers In 7,289 560.905 0 TOTAL - 560 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF $21,597,519 $4,530,642 $4,230,754 ,:..~ " 6 6.8.54.~25. 811,250 0: ::." ,,:"':':' 0: '....: :...0':.: "0 l;l~l:l:~;;;W~ ~l iQ~' l ," <'>i~,~l{'t::>QJ:~ ., ~.248,20r .:5,3do;o~0. '580 PEDESJRIAN', BRiDGE 'DiF~ -:,. . ;''.. :-, -0" ,,~. ~-:: ;, - _ 'd ....... ~ II> .. "-_ '" $12,102,626 $6,111,250 3300 4380 Investment Earnings OR Pedestrian Bridge DIF 77,754 157.161 562,431 262,696 $640,185 $419,857 768,336 1,224,923 4,413,680 719,921 85,000 0 7,289 0 $5,274,305 $1,944,844 N " ';-J TOTAL.580 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DIF 590 JRANSp,0Rr.a;J:ION OIF ':, ~; '., " ',. ' _ ". ~. >>_" _--",--.~.. _"-. t_. ..... -" 0 '_. ... " 330.0 4340 4900 5000 Investment Earnings Transportation DIF Other Revenue Transfers In TOTAL - 590 TRANSPORTATION DIF 138,427 271,292 $409,719 1,171,546 471,713 o o $1,643,259 \thtS' a 42.1,178, $421,178 ,.,...."'..0 .-: 75.0,.0.00' :, ,:,::":~;:j:"'::;:!m'O:;; ,,:;,i80,oof $930,000 .:... d ;: 90,QOO, $90,000 '.0\ ,,75.0.00.0,'. ':- :n;};,t~t;::I' ,- 'I: !,!':'['cn,i . .;;402,000 $2,152,000 ~:~~-f:~f,.~~~~~~!~.~\;;;F~;,;~~:JI:If~:~~~~~~~~H~ED:tJjEE';Q~Rtv~Nr:lt~s;;'~." ~-.-',.:;I~ -;.?-~ c<,~:r"~-~:; - ,;:-,: ~-~"~ _ .. ~;Io:_ """J..~__.. _'" ",j.~.. '" l'lO.kllt ,~q..~~..U . "'., ~ ~;r-> _ .... .Jo __' ~__ _ _ _ . "'~___~i_~ ~__ _ ~______.._... -... ....._~~______ '606~'REDEVE[6PMENifiAG6Ne~ :~"!+e '\t:' c;,~' .i~~ ~ - ~', >". ,"" '" - ~ ~.~.. . ~~" ":,- _: . ~ . .. ~ 3000 Property Tax 3,876,643 6,076,772 6,353,413 3300 Investment Earnings 699,468 598,006 295,952 3700 7onino FF'F'~ 0 0 2,542 --.....;;). --- 3720 Document Fees 17 0 0 4360 Bayfront Fine Arts Fee 0 0 25,000 4430 . Redev Agency Reimbursements 0 0 1,793 4450 CIP Reimbursements 0 0 0 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 80,133 11,087 0 4900 Other Revenue 1,054,414 47,304 762,838 5000 Transfers In 263,708 4,000,347 0 TOTAL - 600 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY $5,974,383 $10,733,516 $7,441,538 N '" 'I' 670 SWTAxAGREEMEN>r~ . -. ~: - - ~' '---;--, :-:,' _,_ ."~"_, ""'""~ __ ,'n ____-L... _ _~ 1.....~ _'_ ....,,-, 3000 3300 Property Tax lnvestment ,Earnings 975,153 31,689 $1,006,842 1,237,035 56,789 $1,293,824 1,363,173 85,569 . $1,448,742 TOTAL - 670 SW TAX AGREEMENT '680 DEBf SERV - REDEV'AGENCV: ' '. .', . '. , . --'"-- ~~ ....." -- -- ~'- ,- ^ ... .-....~ ) 1,451,978 .. '132,60~ ':,': :' . b' , '0 . .' br o , :;':' ::,'" <'n m,-'-' ,;_' ..'d. . .,..... o. '''''",,:' .' 0: . '855'797 C....,.""_,.,.,.",,.' >_..<,''::; >><,., "/< -',v" $12,440,384 '_"_ ,_pc' o >H.'" ; 0 14, S25,385 << i'?$';OO,9,; .., .....'~.'O. ----c:"!i; >,:\,;',;;-0",: -"_U)>"'~'>', '.' ., ,.. '. '. '., 0" 0.. ''/-; '. ". ....: . 3q,9~~ .. . ,,,:.....0 ...t"8qii.iioo" $15,580,385 ~:,<>:',', $0 $0 3000 Property Tax 3,584,859 2,327,101 3,318,076 3300 Investment Earnings 209,870 386,439 269,202 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 0 257,507 7,665 i;t~tt: :.J 4900 Other Revenue 0 25,760,000 0 5000 Transfers In 1,081,010 17,373,176 1,492,586 TOTAL - 680 DEBT SERV - REDEV AGENCY $4,875,739 $46,104,223 $5,087,529 ..0 .., "~:!~:i:'74!QQ2_ ,- _________,<~_"__ 9c:o,'b; ,"" b". . ...a.47,~4? . .. $3,921,946 ... .;.0 o """""?""o" , '~~~t;~;l;:1' --.-,} o ~,9~4,423 . $5,984,423 "i" ;..,'! :~1':;'''':1'~ ',,"!;'h ~',::~ --.;!" ~'~,'!':\.;".";'S~H' 'EI;",I!:,I:~i; I'O'f,'!'RE"'1'E",",'I'I"E"S" ,;:,' , -,' -" " '-i ,.;'. H '-:c:" '- ~-f ~,~' '~J~.."'.'._-"":"O;"~~.'\::'.J:~. A".. ~_r._. ~:*2 .:::. ~,~_ ~-:~J:lJ-~~.S '~_.1 .><T ,!;.'^_I~.\:.!J~~_~_~_ _ _'-~_'_~~ ~,<\~~~,~__ =-~.:~:.j_' "?O~Oi.M.r~~.tO;(~TAA,p~9il~Q:ts~~;r..~~~:{.;:~ :'i,~i~~{ ,-::,;" 3060 Residential Construction Tax 668,761 393,650 151.325 3300 Investment Earnings 1,356.184 2,688,192 2,146.264 4370 Park Acquisition & Develop Fee 13,330.770 7,980,398 1 468,781 4900 Other Revenue 12.977 37,596 0 5000 Transfers In 17.223,884 0 1,102,129 TOTAL.700 MISC CAPITAL PROJECTS $32,592,576 $11,099,836 $4,868,499 ......::206.000 50.000, , 0.._ 0' j ,000090 ',': 5pO,goo; ,',,',::':}'o' ". Y",',' '0. 1 ..l""O, ...' 60000 " ,;~ ]!^~;:::~~I!;L ,':1::--::,',': ~ $1,200,000 $610,000 N '" <p ~ 3300 Investment Earnings 3400 State Grants 3500 Federal Grants 3600 Other Agency Grants 4480 Other City Funds Reimbursement 4900 Other Revenue 5000 Transters In (45,920) 86,625 1,791,677 88,300 o o 3,384 TOTAL.730 OTHER TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS 415,642 2,108,082 23,837 o 59,662 8,290 o 115,623 4,047,734 205,145 39,661 2,769 o o !' 0,:, " 0 ..7,139,969 : 8,777,555~ 6,720,30.9 ",633,286': ...':'Jr,31ci ," 26:B~;: .", ';:'~"[i -,(rT :;~': '0:;;; li<:"--'- C- , "',,0 ,'....' $1,924,066 $2,615,513 $4,410,932 $14,001,588 $9,678,490 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS $342,606,160 $327,473,835 $312,802,698 $289,609,385 $289,987,631 -23D- ";' I' <;jl" i,.[ ",I, :'ill:,~~l\ I . HI ''';:~::P~!;','''~;:::~::::'::' \~\" :..'......t....L,""."'~:J -:r~,e .~~~~~ ~~I..~."'t,I>.'t':;:.o. ."--, "'y" r'" \l,_,~ ii 'If l~t',: ~"'""til fir ;'7! /. '), r-,("""'<r' 1'; ~,; It 1''1'' . 1<< lr~~ ",I ~ ..':. ;1 '!.:tJ', '110..... ,I 'll,..J ,~,"J 1, '.ll ;3 \..1' '. j , "! ':~i~. ~ .! l' ';~ C " f T , ~ 0 , " I' , , ~' ~.. . ." .. '. " ;" ..,< ',', , ,~ .. ,. .' . . , ~,." 'I;' .. .. PRO P IF~SCAi o SED YIEA.R fUND BALANCE PROJECTIONS BUD G 2 0 {] 9 -231- I i:,' ; 'U'".' '}~t~:!~j::;.. !~~~"" .. :"" ~. ,'. c.'c-' ^, '. ~', . : ":': FUND BALANCE PROJE~TIONS ~- ." . . .'''. -=- GENERAL HJND .' . - 100 236 General Fund Development Services Fund 9,301,845 o 132,844,444 5,858,031 142,146,289 5,858,031 (132,844,444) (5,831,292) t:'i9:30f8i5J ~:T2.6,1:i~ 9,328,584 TOTAL. GENERAL FUND 9,301,845 138,702,475 148,004,320 (138,675,736) REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & HOUSING AUTHORITY Tax Aareement and Debt Service Funds 689 2000 Tax Alloc Bond (RDA Proj) 942,655 942,655 (515,000) l"'i1. 421:6'55]1 691 Long.term Advances DSF . RDA (36,649,995) 2,782,842 (33,867,153) (4,187,842) l1(38;05!1i~~,!i)j 693-694 ERAF Bonds FY05 and FY06 163,211 226,201 389,412 (226,201 ) t::'(!<16}:?J!l 695.696 06 Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds (A & B) 3,581,776 2,011,744 5,593,520 (2,123,744) C:3:469;'1~ N 697 08 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds 20,397,955 (963,636) I:,') 9,434,;3,W '" 19,434,319 963,636 'f TOTAL (12,528,034) 5,984,423 (6,543,611 ) (8,016,423) (14,560,034) Redevelooment Proiect Area Funds 611 Redev BayfrontfT own Centre I (2,325,751) 5,822,162 3,496,411 (4,627,001) (1,025,000) t'12;'i5s;s9Q] 641 Redev Fine Arts 31,286 31,286 f!~H: '31'286] ... .~...._, 651 So WestfT~n Ctr II/Oty Vly 2,939,858 9,758,223 12,698,081 (9,228,927) (300,000) ~:1,::l,;1.2~:1,!5,1J 652 RDA 2000 TABs Project Fund 678,339 678,339 L':,'!'6'7a::i:i'91 653 RDA 2008 TARBs Project Fund 7,808,210 7,808,210 (800,000) rJt~ 7,008;210l 671-675 SW proj Acrea Taxing Agreement 899,212 899,212 om' 89g,?12:~ TOTAL 1 0,031,154 15,580,385 25,611,539 (14,655,928) (1,325,000) 9,630,611 HousinQ Funds 313 CV Housing Authority 353,559 1,352,955 1,706,514 (1,028,230) F'i( , 67S;Z84l 315 RDA Housing Program 3,920,000 3,920,000 (3,920,000) ~ - 'ill F' ." " "-. - - <,'" 317 RDA Low & Mod Income Housing 4,411,966 6,767,110 11,179,076 (1,541,430) :1":;9,631:5:46':1 ,~,'~~,,,, TOTAL 8,685,525 8,120,065 16,805,590 (6,489,660) 10,315,930 TOTAL - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & HOUSING AUTHORITY 6,188,645 29,684,873 35,873,518 (29,162,012) (1,325,000) 5,386,507 ~ .. ,', ~ ,.o~. ' ;FUNDOiuANCE PROjECTI'ONS' . . .' .. . , . .: - ~ __ _ -A __. _ _ _ ___ ENTERPRISE FUNDS., ' : ' . Transit Funds 401 Baylront Trolley Station TDA 0 102,679 102,679 (102,679) u 402 Transit CVT 0 1,635,670 1,635,670 (1,635,670) 403 Transit Capital Projects 179,586 179,586 TOTAL 179,586 1,738,349 1,917,935 (1,738,349) 179,586 Sewer Funds 411 Sewer Income 1,846,450 1,846,450 tJ,;~4~,~50t:i 412 Special Sewer 420,800 420,800 A-~;, ',~426:800'J 413 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve 42,317,086 (917,000) rn-"~" 39,708,222 2,608,864 Ui1,429c9~:ii: 414 Sewer Service Revenue 8,135,622 27,101,095 35,236,717 (26,986,095) (115,000) hf; 8~135;622] " 428 Sewer Facility Replacement 1,641,320 1,693,318 3,334,638 (174,258) (700,000) 1....2;460,380". w f" t.:<"''''''~".'.,...,.,,--.......".;' 431 Tel Cyn Sewer Basin Plan DIF 1,045,764 1,045,764 (35,000) (Eii,1,o.1'o--;764..1 432 Poggi Cyn Sewer Basin DIF 1,432,128 20,000 1,452,128 (10,000) ~.:m. 1',4~.?;128\J 433 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF 226,537 100,000 326,537 (324,091) r:;;~"2'446;~ _,,,, ,. __n_.. . TOTAL 54,456,843 31,523,277 85,980,120 (27,529,444) (1,732,000) 56,718,676 TOTAL.. ENTERPRISE FUNDS 54,636,429 33,261,626 87,898,055 (29,267,793) (1,732,000) 56,898,262 SpECIAL REVENUE FUNDS , .' . Transportation Funds 221 Gas Tax 0 3,742,716 3,742,716 (3,869,200) E[, (1J..~484)] 225 Traffic Signal 1,231,151 250,000 1,481,151 (15.000) (1,067,000) ["Ci'~ 399'-151!l ~,-,..:..:......-"""' 227 Transportation Sales Tax 1 ,081 ,209 11,827,655 12,908,864 (1,429) (11,911,875) [[~._..c, .d ~5.?60':; TOTAL 2,312,360 15,820,371 18,132,731 (3,885,629) (12,978,875) 1,268,227 Parkina Funds 241 Parking Meter 514 568,126 568,640 (419,731) (120,000) 1 :d'- ': 28,909) "-"".",,,,,:'-;,.,..,.,-,,~...,.,, 243 Town Centre I.Parking District 23.912 23,912 I ;d: "'~ 23:91 ?~'i TOTAL 24,426 568,126 592,552 (419,731) (120,000) 52,821 r:I -, ~ ,. w _! _. ~ _ _ _ ___~~__~-. :"o', .. ,: --: : '.. ; " .. , ',.'.. ',.:fUND BAllANCE PROJECTIONS . . . . ~. - - - 1 _ "~_ _ ~ _ _ _.: _ _ _ __ Publie Safetv Funds 245 T ra!fie Safety 807,410 534,140 1,341,550 (538,140) 1:-:-#';,8,Ol&19:J 251 Suppl Law Enforcement Services 225,617 111,406 337,023 (111,406) r'lC7225,6\'7] 252 Police Department Grants 56,815 3,336,370 3,393,185 (3,336,371) 5!?']J6J 253 Inmate Welfare Fund 0 83,944 83,944 (20,000) '3,9~ 254 Local Law Enf Block Grant 9,969 224,860 234,829 (224,860) 9,~6E3 256 Asset Seizure 521,004 220,125 741,129 (100,125) [,:;~'iI311 ,qO~.::J TOTAL 1,620,815 4,510,845 6,131,660 (4,330,902) 1,800,758 Librarv and Cultural Arts Funds 261 California Library Service Act 129,312 105,000 234,312 (25,000) (102,644) !5:'i;~...lD6;66[J ..JiJ!CL;_, , 262 Public Libra", Act 1,011 1,011 1:<"1' ''',1;0'11"1 <,<>-......:J".,,_~>,w N 265 CA Dept of Education Sect. 321 2,353 2,353 F''''~:::'2;353'1 w 267 McCandliss Cultural Arts 14,288 900 15,188 (1,600) t...;::. J3:58,.!3j 'f' TOTAL 146,964 105,900 252,864 (26,600) (102,644) 123,620 Sundrv Grant Funds 268 State Recreation Grants 0 140,000 140,000 r' ~:'10;06iil " ',. , 272 Federal Grants Fund 0 428,559 428,559 (333,559) (95,000) [.'.,'" .OJ "'''''.Ji..:"..,..:"_.L.L..,-.,.,,., 274 ARRA Fund 0 819,738 819,738 (24,592) (795,146) f'....-,....;-,..'.i'J ;"i; "" ~~-''i'''' '-:' ..' __~O' TOTAL 1,388,297 1,388,297 (358,151) (890,146) 140,000 Conservation Funds 281 Waste Managernent & Recycling 0 390,362 390,362 (356,342) L'. ''',3i2.?2J 282 Environmental Services Fund 0 1,177,000 1,177,000 (1,120,584) r~D~56;416'1 285 Energy Conservation 0 551,808 551,808 (551,808) tee .0:: "'2] ;.",,---.:..~>,- - TOTAL 2,119,170 2,119,170 (2,028,733) 90,436 Community Development Block Grant 311 CDBG Housing Program 73,546 547,400 620,946 (547,400) f,;;;""""T73.5461 - - . .... '-" 314 Emergency Shelter Grant Prog 3,049 88,198 91,247 (4,394) (83,804) k':~,~,g,~@] E~' -'~ 321 Home Program 0 100,723 100,723 (100,723) -4-~"~-" <....J;,-~:O '~"",,~ 325 CDBG Program - Income Projects 48,766 48,766 f"jj,t!48;76[j ;:, ~. '.',' \' ~.',.t "~'~'..;' ~",'.'>FU~JD BA'LI\NCE PROJECTIONS " - '_ - . . - , _~ :-: 333 " w '" 342 343 344 345 351 352 353 354-376 378 379 380 382 383 386 387 388 389 301 FY2000 Comm Dev Block Grant TOTAL (1,168,172) (1,820,689) (2,066,472) ~,j;' 0,,1 (2,150,276) 125,361 100,000 225,361 3,134,644 3,870,965 3,234,644 4,096,326 Open Space District Funds CFD 11-M RHR McMillin CFD 12.M Vlg7 CFD 13-M Vlg2 CFD 12M. OR Village 7 Town Centre Landscaping Dist I Bay Blvd Landscaping Dist Eastlake Maintenance Dist #1 Open Space District #1 - #31 CFD 07M-Eastlk II Woods, Vista CFD 08M-Vlg 6 McM & Oty Ranch CFD 09M OR Vlg II CFD 99-2 Otay Ranch Vlg 1 We Town Ctr Business Imprv Distr Otay Ranch Acquisition Dis! CFD 98-3 Sunbow 2 Comm Facility 97.1 (Otay Rnch) Otay Ranch Village 1,2,6,7,12 TOTAL I :~ 6o;41l4JJ t,,:,,~5n473'1 ':.::',~<"c"..'.....-",<<" u.::=:. 37;322', I" - ;488;802 t . ..~" 2:H94': :32' 370:18 , 1', 3,0_9.~ 153~j r;~____..m_:__"..::~l :"., ic519,080J r:;-:-4 t8,529~l ~ i,'.,'958,847I L~,_,",..",,,,,...;..;;.,",,,,,, f"b63,646] r . ,., '7-,750;.' '"","~",...'"..~~./,;. r'''~37-6-8-1-9' I l...;' "ill r, ," 671,095"1 ""',...;,;...n<>......;.<..<._,,,.._ ~' :~9_~.fTh3J ~'_ 11, 60;143:1 .,.---<----......"..,""'--.....-..- 11,308,772 60,484 110,608 171,092 (110,608) 577,473 482,790 1,060,263 (482,790) 37,322 4,217 41,539 (4,217) 488,802 521,723 1,010,525 (521,723) 23,194 23,194 32,064 14,873 46,937 (14,873) 370,188 372,960 743,148 (372,960) 3,092,153 2,934,240 6,026,393 (2,934,240) 519,080 615,876 1,134,956 (615,876) 478,529 935,011 1,413,540 (935,011) 958,847 926,540 1,885,387 (926,540) 563,646 720,097 1,283,743 (720,097) 7,750 7,750 376,819 871,265 1,248,084 (871,265) 671,095 1,011,592 1,682,687 (1,011,592) 2,991,183 2,239,941 5,231,124 (2,239,941) 60,143 104,916 165,059 (104,916) 11,308,772 11,866,649 23,175,421 (11,866,649) 84,919 525,000 609,919 (548,118) Storm Drain Revenue ;~'T'6):86TJ INTERNA~, SERV)CE FU.NDl) _ 231 Workers Compensation 1,312,576 2,821,917 4,134,493 (3,458,859) 232 Flexible Spending Account 111 310,000 310,111 (310,000) 341 Public Liability Trust 0 1,800,000 1,800,000 (1,800,000) 391 Central Garage 627,470 3,987,770 4,615,240 (4,225,627) 393 Technology Replacement 7,382 7,382 (7,382) TOTAL -INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 1,947,539 8,919,687 10,867,226 (9,801,868) 'f"~"""-~''1 !w.", 675,634 ;j I' ,~. >,1,11"1 ,'"~-";,,,;~,.-,,., [:':+::';O:j f'" 389613,' "'.,~-io".,..<.,~.;,_..! i:-'r:~r:i];::~6;';,~ 1,065,358 , . .' '; ',,' : .: fUNDi BALANCE PROJ,ECTIONS . " :'-p - ~_I ~ - ~ . k '. _ R ~_ .. _ __ _~_ ;0.__ __~_ ~----'__ _ _~ _ C~PIJAI:.>PROj~cfs FUNDS. ' , ' Assessment District Funds 501 Otay Lakes Rd AD 88-2 Improv 95,924 95,924 ~'T95:924J 503 East H St AD 87,1 lmprov 126,839 126.839 ~26,839d 507 Otay Valley Rd AD 90-2 Improv 85,302 85,302 1.;-[I:,:?5,3-q~ 511 Otay Vly Rd Fee Recovery Dist 851,641 851,641 M;851,6411 512 EL Greens II AD 94-1 Improv 1,048,658 1,048,658 lli::jT6~:~!i~] 515 Twin Oaks Ave AD 96-1 Improv 14,300 6,347 20,647 (3,680) fi: i n;1K96j~ 516 Oxford St AD 97-1 Improv 8,562 2,043 10,605 (3,854) D'c '6:1:51~ n ....""""'....._.,.._. 517 AD2004-1 Dixon Drive 94,379 10,070 104,449 t.,.. <164"4493 ';:'~~- 518 AD2005-1 Tobias Drive 60,424 10,012 70,436 (60,000) L .;'10,436 : " TOTAL 2,386,029 28,472 2,414,501 (67,534) 2,346,967 w -;-J Develooment Imoact Fee Funds 542 Tel Cyn Drainage Plan DIF 4,349,871 4,349,871 (1,250,000) I..........~-B 'k 3,099,87.1 . 567-582 DIF - Public Facilities (2,912,004) 6,111,250 3,199,246 (5,275,538) E:J?J076;29,2)j DIF-OR Village Pedestrian Ramp 9,943 40,000 49,943 (43,000) 12'"'---1 587 ".;..:. "6943.' il..-i..o.:.;,;~;".,,;; 588 OR Vlg11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF 2,197,457 50,000 2,247,457 (3,200) I.; ,2-:-244,257,'J 591 Transportation DIF 15,698,353 2,152,000 17,850,353 (6,091,916) (2,845,000) Ii... 8,:~13,~3Z] TOTAL 19,343,620 8,353,250 27,696,870 (11,413,654) (4,095,000) 12,188,216 Mise Capital Proiect Funds 714 CIP - Fiscal Agent 1,121,875 1,121,875 i: ',1~121,81:5::J 715 Park Acquisition & Development 29,828,539 500,000 30,328,539 (25,000) (2,000,000) t ; 28303539'1 ~"}"N,---!.c..'M"...'..;; 717 Resid. Construction/Conversion 569,242 110,000 679,242 (679,242) f"!--'I '";;,,J;.2~,{: -h:";'.9'-- 725 indust. Development Authority 10,148 10,148 ~.1i 10:14sj <-<-,-----~"....;" TOTAL 31,529,804 610,000 32,139,804 (704,242) (2,000,000) 29,435,562 Other Transportation Funds 723 Bicycle Facilities 0 267,649 267,649 (266,220) 735 Transportation Partnership 16,911 16,911 736 Other Transportation Program 0 5,677,434 5,677,434 (1,402,000) (3,690,234) , ,.'. "',: '~~:: ~ : '~";.; .FUND' B~LANCE PROj'EGT:iONS- - - - -- . ~~ ". , - - - - - -- - ~ --- Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Prop 1 B Hwy Safety TOTAL (1,402.000) ~ , , 'JEjO' , L:". . ..: .",....:-,. l' i'/:,.a. -~:~~,~. _ 1:< ~3i69) ;O,!2U 4,294,598 o 3,691,058 3,707,969 348,000 3,385,407 9,678,490 TOTAL - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS 56,967,422 18,670,212 75,637,634 (13,587,430) (13,784,861) 48,265,343 DEBT. SERVICE FUNDS' _ ,: .' N '" 'C' 441 442 446 449 451 452 453 Debt Service - City Funds 1994 Pension Obligation Bond COBG Section 108 Loan Notes Payable Adamo Property SO Co Regional Comm Systems Long-term Advances OSF - City KS Fire Equipment Capital Lease CES Loan Repayment TOTAL 3,068 2,509,188 2,512,256 (2,509,188) L:'iYf3;068] 0 734,471 734,471 (734,4 71) I" 'I ~". "0] df':- ~' -1.;", ..:: ' c':_';;"&;:_,__,-"-:,,, 2 48,113 48,115 (48,113) r"~"-"n ,: ',,-, ,: ';'2' 174 295,734 295,908 (295,734) bh::.f' '~7~ (14,169,201) 5,607,534 (8,561,667) (5,600,000) bJt4;f61;6~m (172,216) !;;~~:<IJ 0 172,216 172,216 ;:;<.) "'i"''1'''t <0': 0 194,000 194,000 (194,000) [: . -'~: '2] """"~:":'~':'-'->- (14,165,957) 9,561,256 (4,604,701) (9,553,722) (14,158,423) 2,581,396 1,767,610 4,349,006 (1,867,522) I':: 2;481,481] -"""--<":'<"""""-~"-"'- 2,587,367 3,915,746 6,503,113 (3,915,746) r;;~2:587,3ill 1,489,985 1,054,505 2,544,490 (1,070,766) ['7'iT473'72Rj ~--=!....~ 2,395,951 2,396,117 4,792,068 (2,396,117) L:.d:~95;~?1J 1,322,150 1,278,200 2,600,350 (1,278,199) f';':~:322;::f51;1 10,376,849 10,412,178 20,789,027 (10,528,350) 10,260,677 (3,789,108) 19,973,434 16,184,326 (20,082,072) (3,897,746) 140,976,389 289,987,631 430,964,019 (265,862,113) (33,083,802) 132,018,104 Debt Service - CV Financina Authoritv 448 2000 COP Ser A-Fin Project 450 2002 COP Police Facility Proj 471 2003 Refunding Cert of Part 472 2004 COP Clv Ctr Proj Phase I 473 2006 COP Clv Ctr Proj Phase 2 TOTAL TOTAL - DEBT SERVICE FUNDS GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS ,~ " c, ," <'''bIt '1 /l' iq.%..,....1 ".r "'"'" af"'T-n""l. '. <;,q'lI/!l~! 1!, 'I 'lir ",,,,r,,,,, " ~"r:' '" , 'II. ,,, ,., C,,-, .., 1 "I ". .., . tl: ." 'I' 'I' i: 1" ,,~. "I ' ~,1.,1 l ,"- l' {' ";!~....;'~ :i ;::Ul2.cJe 'iii 1,J::.:V vi! -~, PROPOSED BUDGET IF~SCAl YrEAIR 2009-10 SCHEDULE Of IN1ERFlUND TRANSfERS -239- l.'" ';'~",';:-;:'-, ':" "scHED'uLEoF INT'ERFUNDl'RAN-sFERs',- ',-:- - " ',' -" - - - -- - ~ - - ,~oo 'GgNERAHUND ." .; - ,: " '. . : . . . ~ "''--.~ - . , . '. , , N .. 221 Gas Tax 236 Development Services Fund 245 Traffic Safety 261 CA Library Services Act 282 Environmental SeNices Fund 301 Storm Drain Revenue 313 CV Housing Authority 393 Tech Replacement 402 TransiUCVT Fund 414 Sewer Service Revenue 651 SWfTCll/OV Proj 691 L T Adv DSF RDA TOTAL TRANSFERS IN .100 GENERAL FUND Staff Time Reimbursement and Equipment Overhead Reimbursement Staff Time Reimbursement and Equipment Staff Time Reimbursement and Equipment Staff Time Reimbursement and Equipment Staff Time Reimbursement Overhead Reimbursement Transfer remaining fund balance to General Fund Staff Time Reimbursement Staff Time Reimbursement Overhead Reimbursement TCII,Bayfront. Merged Project Loan Repayment to GF '236 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES F.UND ' '. - - 100 General Fund 414 Sewer Service Revenue General Fund subsidy to Development Services Fund Staff Time Reimbursement ~""c, .-i340--:DOO"1 E:,"n' {;~~;0~2J 5362,050 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN .236 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUND 253 INMATE WELFARE FND , '. . 100 General Fund TOTAL TRANSFERS IN .253 INMATE WELFARE FND Grant payment reclassification F '..~63:941l $63,944 272 'FEDERAL'GRANTS'FND . '; -. ~ 100 General Fund TOTAL TRANSFERS IN . 272 FEDERAL GRANTS FND General Fund match for federal grant tli;; . " 3,!imt..l $34,679 . '~'.. :"',""... :. .': SCl{EDtiLj: OF INTERFUNO JIi~_NSF-ERS - ~ .. '_ ~_' ~--- '313,'CV HODSING !' ': ,',' . " .. ' . -- , ~ 315 RDA Housing Program 317 RDA Low & Mod Income 321 Home Program 333 CDBG TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 313 CV HOUSING Grant payment reclassification Overhead Reimbursement Overhead Reimbursement Overhead Reimbursement '317 'RDA LOW & MOD INCOME " . . - .. 315 RDA Housing Program 611 RDAlBFfTCI 651 SWfTCll/OV Proj TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 317 RDA LOW & MOD INCOME Merge RDA Housing Program 20% set aside requirement 20% set aside requirement l.:L..:2:8~1 -~---'iO'5":l ",,_ 1.o.()2.~1~ 1~~::;1~9-il.2:645.il $6,74~,474 N .... ~ '341 'PUBL.:IC-L1ABILiTYTRUST' - -.,- ~ - -. 100 General Fund General Fund transfer for public liability expenses U,C ~1~80jl;2Q2J $1,800,000 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 341 PUBLIC LIABILITY TRUST 414 S_EWE~ SERVJCE REVEt-jUE:, 428 Sewer Facility Repiacement TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 414 SEWER SERVICE REVENUE Staff Time Reimbursement - Video Inspection $174,258 441 ~994 PENSION.OBL.:IGATION,BOND ' , ~:a ". ~. _' . 100 General Fund Debt Service Payment - Pension Obiigation Bond TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 441 1994 PENSION OBLIGATION BOND R,:',; 2,509~ $2,509,188 442 CDBG SECTION 108 LOAN ' . ' 333 Community Dev Block Grant Debt Service Payment - Section 108 Loan TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 442 CDBG SECTION 108 LOAN L " 734~471.1 $734,471 446 NOTES PAYABLE ADAMO PROPERTY ' . ,- . - - 567 DIF Adamo Property Debt Service Payment - Parking Lot Acquisition Cost TOTAL TRANSFERS IN -446 NOTES PAYABLE ADAMO PROPERTY $48,113 -v, ,.r.,,_ ..."...., .;]I _.-,~.~ ,y ,_..___.~__~_ ______~ p ....'.1. '....:.,.. ':.SCHED'UI:!EOFINTf:.RFUN'DTRANSFERS' ..' :t '. _ . . ~_ ~ __ _ _ _ __ 448 ':2000 COP SER A-FIN PROJECT <.. '. '" -. _' ~ '" _ 1 - _ '.W~!lIl1;~ ,. J'. .,.,.>; ....:.:; ":.\~.,,..,....... I I 0 f 0 D 100 General Fund 574 Corporation Yard Relocation TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 448 2000 COP SER A-FIN PROJECT 449'SD CO REGIONf.L COMM SYSTEMS' . . Debt Service Payment - Corporation Yard Debt Service Payment - Corporation Yard I ~ ~669:3;r6'1 h.~:'-1 ,098;290 <J $1,767,610 100 General Fund Debt Service Payment - 800Mhz Backbone Cost TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 449 SO CO REGIONAL COMM SYSTEMS $295,734 450' 2002 COP ,=,6L1CE FA.CILlTY PROJ' .., , " .. Y' 100 General Fund 573 Police Department Facility Remodel TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 450 2002 COP POLICE FACILITY PROJ 451 LONG-TERM ADVANCES DSF - CITY - - . Debt Service Payment - Police Facility Debt Service Payment - Police Faciiity r~0:179~1l3'1 tr,,;~J:73.?,,633) $3,915,746 301 Storm Drain Rev 433 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF 515 Twin Oaks Assessment District 96-1 516 Oxford St Assessment District 97-1 591 Transportation DIF TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 451 LONG-TERM ADVANCES DSF - CITY 452 FIRE E.QUIPT CAPL I::EASE . '. . Debt Serv Pymt - Trunk Sewer Capl Res-Reso 18996 Debt Serv Pymt - Trunk Sewer Capl Res-FYOO-01 Budget Reso Debt Serv Pymt - Trunk Sewer Capl Res-Reso 18873 Debt Serv Pymt - Trunk Sewer Capl Res-Reso 18795 Interfund loan from TDIF to PFDIF ":" "' "" . 50;000 ; L.. ,~__,.~ r'-~"-Oiii :,,~:;'. . 250;000 " t,.-, , ",' 3,680:1 ('-::-::;-:-"'3' 8'54'1 ;;;;;:;;';;;~I:...:,,)_. f:;;c: 5,300;0001 $5,607,534 100 General Fund TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 452 FIRE EQUIPT CAPL LEASE 453 CI;C ~OAN REPMT,' '. - -~ "~.- - --- - "'~ Debt Serv Pymt - Fire Equipment 100 General Fund $172,216 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 453 CEC LOAN REPMT Debt Serv Pymt - Fire Equipment f <,':=;:;'194,0601 $194,000 : '" ,,", >' l' '. ,'. SCHEDl.fLE. OF -I.NURFUND TRANSFERS' H,.,: . ' ., ,'" ~...' ~. - I ".... .~ ~_, - _, _ _'--__ ___-"''- _" _,.._~........~ .-._._ ,~ ,..... .,...,..........""..:.".'.,,.. D 47,1 2003-REftJNDINGCERT OF,PAI(JT '" :- 651 Redev Agency SWfTCll/OV Proj TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 471 2003 REFUNDING CERT OF PART Debt Service - 03 Refunding COP RDA 93 COP ! t: i1:05f(M53 $1,054,505 4?2" 2004 COP qV"CTR PROJ pHAS~ 'I ,": -.. , ' 100 General Fund 572 Public Facilities DIF ,Civic Center 717 Residential Construction Tax Debt Service - Civic Center Phase 1 Debt Service, Civic Center Phase 1 Debt Service, Western Chula Vista Infrastructure '\'J3)4,~ItJ '402'i,ocfoll , 79:242-- $2,396,117 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 472 2004 COP CIV CTR PROJ PHASE I 473 20,06 COP CIV CTR PROJ PHASE,2 '" .... f' 100 General Fund 572 Public Facilities DIF ' Civic Center TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 473 2006 COP CIV CTR PROJ PHASE 2 Debt Service, Civic Center Phase 2 Debt Service, Civic Center Phase 2 ~,:28'7;.€.'98'i1 L:,_",,990;S~ $1,278,200 571 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF " _. _ , ,,' 451 L T Adv DSF City TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 571 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF Interfund loan from TDIF to PFDIF P;:;:',s'i,360,ooO'1 $5,300,000 591 T~NSPORTATION DIF" " , 736 Oth Transportation Prog TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 591 TRANSPORTATION DIF Capital expenditure reimbursements Q" 1;402,OOQJ "".~._.....~.;",., $1,402,000 611 BAYFRONTrrC' ' ': -~': .--,; ;", - - - 653 RDA 2008 TARBs proj TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 611 BAYFRONT/TCI Fund street improvement capital project j. - '.;,:~8(jQ-;0OO'1 $800,000 691 LO~G-TERM ADVANCES DSF - RDA - . . .... ~ - , '..",,- ~ . " - - 611 Redev BayfrontfTown Ctr 651 Redev Agency SWfTCII/OV proj TOTAL TRANSFERS IN ,691 LONG-TERM ADVANCES DSF - RDA Interfund loans payment to GF Interfund loans payment to GF f":::'Y; ---m-:-95:5'] L:.J2:309;8~ $2,782,842 : . ".,'. . SCHEDULE Of INIERFUND TRANSFERS . . . .. - ~,- . . '_. ..,;"",. _" fl.... ~'. _l>. _~ ._~ ~ __~__ ._~___~ __.__ __~. ____ ___ ....~~I iW04 "9'0 D 693 05 TN< REV (ERAF) ..... _ . 611 Redev BayfrontfTown Ctr 651 So WestfTwn Ctrll/Otay Valley TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 693 05 TAX REV (ERAF) Debt Service payment Debt Service payment n;;;;--'~-'ii"'l ..,,,'''5.~:88~;' F '49'682]" .....:,.c<;".:_.:... .;._ ."'.. $100,569 - - - 694 06 if AX REV (ERAF) , ' 611 Redev BayfrontfTown Ctr 651 So WestfTwn Ctrll/Otay Valley TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 694 06 TAX REV (ERAF) Debt Service payment Debt Service payment [;';:~:~~,.?BJ r;:-:-46)581 $125,632 695 06 SR TABS SER A . N ". 'f' 611 Redev BayfrontfTown Ctr TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 695 06 SR TABS SER A Debt Service payment c;;:: 1,017;545) -;-".'~~"""""""'~ $1,017,545 69606SRTABSSERB ':, ,'. ; , " 611 Redev BayfrontfTown Ctr TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 696 06 SR TABS SER B Debt Service payment 1,;'{~,,994:~ $994,199 697 08 TABS , " ' . ' _ _ ~ . . . .' ~ ~ H' 651 So WestfTwn Ctrll/Otay Valley 689 00 Tax Alloc Bnds TOTAL TRANSFERS IN - 697 08 TABS Debt Service payment Close fund 689 due to refundin9 IT ..,::::ill;~361 I' ; ~ .;",515:000] $963,636 , 717 RESlp CO.NSli., .. ::. - .' . 515 AD2005.1 Tobias TOTAL TRANSFERS IN -717 RESID CONST Project reimbursement r '?61J;oQQJ $60,000 723 BICYClE FACILITIES ~ . ' -' 227 TransNet TOTAL TRANSFERS IN -723 BICYCLE FACILITIES Capital expenditure reimbursements a. ..... ~,A:.1.?~ $1,429 $55,197,467 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS .~"\ FlD ,';~"; ii,' f'" ,\, "t\~~;~ 1(~ II 1/ i<-" ""''r" \ V l' ",-r'0 'I: (.p' ';'h;:!.L,.>" ~:/' crtnr Of """""~',.'I " I" '''~'\ I' 1"~".""'."J""" '" 'tf''' "i'," lii'" ., '. '': "-.~,, ill "'I ~i J '~' ~:\ . ,\ .,~,,: R'\,~ ~'. i. :' r~ /"':~:;::\ ':~.' ':1 J ": ,!".."", ~ d "m ,,j '" '" I, <'" t" , , -246- , - - . " . '''.> ,,;,;' >,."" .''It - :"..:,.",;::' :",lh ""i::,::~~:~, !~, '., . . _' ,'. . .-:;R'."',_.> ~ ':" ,~': . I ~ "~" '.. ,:1 .,..,.,_1 . . ,"'" ">-, IPROIPOSIED IBlJDGIET IF~SCAIL VIEAIR 2009-10 AUIHORLllE[) IPOS~l~ONS /BY [)IEIPARlMIENT -247- ~ ~ ^-; ~ ~ Jr;> c~ 701, ~ ~ 9 > ~) F UTJ ~ C. [F\'i';1JIW:l@j . . ~ ~ '_" '1DJE'IDQl]IT - [F\'i'~ [F\'i';1Jii.!g),OO) ~~ @lh~ ~~[Gl!l.'f' Chief of Staff Coastal/Environmental Policy Consultant Constituent Services Manager Councilperson Executive Secretary Mayor Office Specialist (Mayor/ at will) Senior Council Assistant 100 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 100 1.00 4.00 (100) (100) " ., , , .00 4.00 ..' ; 100 .100 '100 5.00.1 100 CITY COUNCIL TOTAL 14.00 (1.00) 13.00 cnvnERK' ~: - . Administralive Secretary 100 ','1 190 Assistanl City Clerk 100 (1.00) City Clerk 1.00 .100 Deputy City Clerk 1.00 .,foo' Records Manager 1.00 '1.00 Records Specialist 1.00 .O~~L Senior Office Specialist 0.50 , 0.50 Senior Records Specialist 100 100 CITY CLERK TOTAL 7.50 (1.00) 6.50 .CITY ATtORNEY -i _. -. . . Assistant City Attorney 1.00 1.00 City Attorney 1.00 1.00 '. Deputy City Attorney II 100 1.00 {aD'; Deputy City Attorney III 4.00 (2.00) . 2.00' .,. Executive Secretary 1.00 (1.00) Legal Assistant 2.00 2pq, Senior Assistant City Attorney 2.00 (100) 1.00' Senior Legal Assistant 1.00 foo CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL 12.00 (2.00) 10.00 'ADMIN I ST.RATI0 r..,( _' _' _ Administrative Secretary Administrative Technician Assistant City Manager Assistant Director of Budget & Analysis City Manager 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 (1.00) I " 1'00 .100 (100) 00 .249. 1?i7~ I?i7 ~ 1?i7:!1mli.P'OO) 1J\"I :!1mli.P'OO) ~ ~&ffi ~11lD)~Sl-~~D) ~~~~' 1,00 1,.00 (1,00) (100) ~(j\@~ Communications Coordinator Director of Budget and Analysis Director of Communications Director of Conservation & Environmental Services Economic Development Officer Environmental Resource Manager Environmental Resource Specialist Executive Assistant to the City Manager Executive Secretary Fiscal & Management Analyst Government Relations Liaison Graphic Designer Principal Economic Development Specialist Principal Management Analyst Senior Graphic Designer Senior Management Analyst Sen ior Secretary Special Events Planner Special Projects Manager ADMINISTRATION TOTAL 1,00 1,00 1,00 100 100 1,00 1,00 100 4,00 1,00 100 1,00 1,00 100 UO 100 1,00 100 (UO) (100) (400) (100) (1,00) (100) (100) (1.00) (100) (100) (16.00) 26.00 ITS, \ I,.' -: . .-- . i c' 100 ,,-I' . i 1.00 00, 1.00, . " i~ 100" 10.00 Administrative Secretary 1 00 (1.00) ':"" Director of Information Technology Services 1 00 T66 GIS Specialist 3.00 3.66 GIS Supervisor 1.00 i!",'" 1.00 Information Technology Support Manager 1 00 ':'1.00 Information Technology Support Specialist 6.00 1 00 (2.00) 500 Operations & Telecommunications Manager 1.00 "100 Senior Applications Support Specialist 2.00 (1.00) I ,~ )oq . Senior Information Technology Support 2.00 -'. 2.00 . Specialist Senior Programmer Analyst 2.00 :;;" i60 , Telecommunications Specialist 1.00 1.06 ' Webmaster 2.00 (1.00) 1.00 ITS TOTAL 23.00 1.00 (5.00) 19.00 HDMANRES0tJRGES . - -"" - I "_ ~ _ Administrative Secretary Assistant Director of Human Resources 100 1.00 (1.00) .250- 1.00 l~ .. 'd_'- . AuiL~OR'I~~D 'P@SliTi~~..isl BY 'ID6P~Ji;rMEISl\1t . ~__ I r."""~''''''!!r~''''r1Tt"':!.-___!'''''P''''t"",, .....................""'. ~. 1;;.~.......,.. ,,__ Benefits Manager Benefits Technician Director of Human Resources Fiscal Office Specialist Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Operations Manager Human Resources Technician Principal Human Resources Analyst Risk Manager Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Human Resources Analyst Senior Risk Management Specialist HUMAN RESOURCES TOTAL ~(~I!I~ ~ '.~. 100 2.00 100 0.50 300 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 5.00 20.50 FIN>-\NCE ~ ,.... n~ . ." . !i\'f~ 1i'i7~1IW ~~ ~~, (1.00) (0.50) (100) ! 1.00 (2.00) (4.50) >1i'i7~1IW ~ ~ 100 '1.00 .,,, '., 1.00, 3.00 . 100, 100 "I" OO"! . 1.00 ' I " 2QO 300 16.00 Accounting Assistant 9.00 (100) , 8:00'" Accounting Technician 4.00 400 Assistant Director of Finance 1.00 1.00 Associate Accountant 2.00 2.00 Budget & Analysis Manager 1.00 1.00 Business License Representative 1.00 ",,,,,., ,f06 Director of Finance 100 '100 Fiscal & Management Analyst 3.00 3.00 Fiscal Operations Manager 1.00 .,1.00 Procurement Specialist 2.00 (1.00) 1.00 Purchasing Agent 100 (1.00) Senior Accountant 1.00 1.00 Senior Procurement Specialist 100 100 Treasury Manager 1.00 ,!"'r" .00 FINANCE TOTAL 25.00 1.00 26.00 GENSVCS/ANIMA~.CARE FACILITY Animal Adoption Counselor Animal Care Assistant . Animal Care Facility Manager Animal Control Officer Animal Control Officer Supervisor Office Specialist Registered Veterinary Technician Senior Animal Care Assistant Senior Office Specialist .251. 1.75 600 100 400 100 350 2.00 1.00 100 ., 1:75, 6.00 1.00 4.00. ,1.00 3.50 2.00 . 1.00 1.00 I . _ c. ~.- A't,J'~~fi~RI~~E~:-!r~l~~~~~ J~Y [)~~vAR.i~~~'Ii ~~_ _~ _ --J 1JiY~ ~ ~ 1JiY~ "f?I7~oo) ~ ~'~Pt ~~ 1.00 !?if ~00l !Bl@}{Q1;1!!!l ~ 100 ..~~. Veterinary ASSistant GEN SVCS/ANIMAL CARE FACILITY TOTAL 22.25 22.25 'PLANNING & -BtJltplr.\lG S~~VICES . ~ Administrative Technician 100 !"L~ . joo Advanced Planning Manager 1.00 TI""" foo Associate Planner 2.00 2.00 Code Enforcement Manager 100 1.00 Code Enforcement Officer 111I 6.00 2.00 8.00 Deputy City ManagerlDirector of Development 1.00 ., 00 Services Development Automation Specialist 100 1.00 .1' " Economic Development Officer 1.00 '1ob' -' Planning Technician 2.00 ' ?OO Principal Economic Development Specialist 1 00 ' , ~ !. i 100: Principal Planner 2.00 2.00 . Secretary 1.00 (100) Senior Administrative Secretary 100 Senior Code Enforcement Officer 2.00 . 2.00 ;.11;, '100' Senior Office Specialist 100 Senior Planner 1.00 (1.00) , Senior Planning Technician 1.00 li'l' 1..00, Senior Project Coordinator 100 100 Sen ior Secretary 100 .00. PLANNtNG & BUILDtNG SERVtCES TOTAL 20.00 2.00 6.00 28.00 ENGINEERING.' .f - - '.: : I Administrative Analyst 1/11 2.00 (2.00) 'j,i', " Assistant Director of Engineering 1.00 (100) ;1 Assistant Surveyor 111I 1.00 (100) Associate Engineer 900 (900) Building Project Manager 2.00 (2.00) "I' >"-1" ' Director of Engineering I City Engineer 100 (100) .Engineering Technician 1111 . 1.00 (1.00) Land Surveyor 1.00 (1.00) II ; . ~I 'i,l, Landscape Architect 050 (050) Principal Civil Engineer 2.00 (200) Principal Management Analyst 1.00 (100) Real Property Manager 1.00 (100) Secretary 1.00 (100) Senior Administrative Secretary 100 (100) .252- @1}~~ Senior Civil Engineer Senior Engineering Technician Senior Office Specialist Signal Systems Engineer 1111 Survey Technician 1111 ENGINEERING TOTAL POLICE i , Administrative Services Manager Chief of Police Civilian Background Investigator Community Service Officer Crime Laboratory Manager Detention Facility Manager Evidence Control Assistant Facility & Supply Specialist Forensics Specialist Latent Print Examiner Office Specialist Parking Enforcement Officer Peace Officer Police Agent Police Captain Police Communications Systems Manager Police Community Relations Specialist Police Data Specialist Police Dispatcher Police Dispatcher Supervisor Police Lieutenant Police Records Specialist Police Records Transcriptionist Police Sergeant Police Services Officer Police Support Services Manager Police Technology Specialist. Police Training and Development Supervisor Principal Management Analyst Public Information Officer (PD) Public Safety Analyst Range Master Secretary Senior Administrative Secretary [NI~ [NI~ ,~.~ '~ '@l}',\'J.~li1jil;:~ 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 100 34.50 [NI~OO> 1R1l9]}{QmID ~~~a."P (500) (2.00) (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (34.50) [NI~OO> ~); ~-'i ,.!.., I" ' 100 100 7.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 050 2.00 300 1.00 2.00 151.00 5300 3.00 1.00 2.00 300 20.00 600 9.00 550 2.00 25.00 12.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 100 500 0.50 4.00 1.00 -253- 1.00 (4.00) (1.00) (100) (200) (5.00) (2.00) (100) 1.00 (100) (1.50) ..: 1.00 '1:00 : :.00 , 3.00 1.ob, 1.00 .. ,100 050 "2:00 _549.00 .. . 49.00 " .1... L,,~ob '.1:00' I...j_ , ~oo .' 20.ob, "d",l '6,00 9.00. '.5.50 '1.2100 2500 12.00 "'1:09 .100 100 3.50 0.50 4.00' 100 l _ _ _~Auf~(i)R~~~I?';iiOS1';f~D~S:;~,Y i!])~~Ji~~1;M'f:rN~- ~ J r, '-~I [ ~ L~~.ID ~ ~ 2.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 337.50 ='=~>$+j 2.00" -4.00 -I 109 1.00 . 1.00 322.00 1.00 (16.50) Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Office Specialist Senior Police Data Specialist Senior Public Safety Analyst Training Programs Specialist POLICE TOTAL o I - - 'FIRE _" _1. __ __ Administrative Secretary 1.00 1.00 Administrative Services Manager 1.00 .! .00, . . ,. Assistant Fire Chief 1.00 (1.00) Deputy Fire Chief 3.00 3.00 Division Chief 100 "1, 1. 00 Facility & Supply Specialist 1.00 1.00 Fire Battalion Chief 7.00 (1.00) ....6,00 I']. Fire Captain 34.00 3400, 'i'! Fire Chief 1.00 ' '-1.00 " Fire Engineer 3500 ','.. 35.00: ' I , Fire Inspector 1/11 5.00 500 Fire Marshal 100 (1.00) Fire Prevention Engineer 100 Dei Firefighter 42.00 42.00 Office Specialist 1.00 ' I.' 1.00 Public Safety Analyst 1.00 ::' 1.00 . Secretary 100 1.00 Senior Fire Inspector 100 1 DO' Senior Office Specialist 1.00 100 FIRE TOTAL 135.00 1.00 136.00 ,PUBLIC WO~KS i _ . Administrative Analyst 1/11 2.00 2.00 Administrative Secretary 1.00 1.00 Administrative Services Manager 1.00 ' 1'00, Animal Adoption Counselor 1.25 (1,25) Animal Care Assistant 6.50 (6.50) Anima' Control Manager 1.00 (100) Animal Control Officer 400 (4.00) Animal Control Officer Supervisor 100 (1.00) ,'"I Assistant Director of Engineering 1.00 100 Assistant Director of Public Works 1.00 1.00 Assistant Surveyor 1/11 1.00 , ,1.00 OJ: .254- ~~(!ID l?t't.~. [WI~1JO) ~~1XlJ ~~".~~ ~~~~ 10.00 1000 2.00 . 2.00 -' 100 ",l.OO , 1.b6 4.00 .",.1350' "1.00 2.00 .,.1.00 2.00 1.00 :~90 ..' 2.00 2.00 :.200 !. ":.. . 230b 200; ,Joo I' 760 . ,2.00 . .1300 : ;:' ,..::;; ~ . ~~ Associate Engineer Building Project Manager Carpenter Construction & Repair Manager Custodial & Facilities Manager Custodial Supervisor Custodian Director of Public Works Electrician Electrician/Equipment Installer Electronics Technician Electronics Technician Supervisor Engineering Technician 1/11 Environmental Health Specialist Equipment Operator Fiscal Office Specialist Gardener 1/11 HVAC Technician Land Surveyor Lead Custodian Locksmith Maintenance Worker 111I Office Specialist Open Space Inspector Open Space Manager Painter Parks & Open Space Manager Parks Manager Parks Supervisor Plumber Principal Civil Engineer Principal Management Analyst Public Works Inspector 1/11 Public Works Manager Public Works Specialist Public Works Supervisor Pump Maintenance Supervisor Pump Maintenance Technician Real Property Manager Registered Veterinary Technician Secretary Senior Administrative Secretary Senior Animal Care Assistant 100 100 1.00 4.00 14.50 100 3.00 100 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2500 3.00 (100) (1.00) 1.00 (100) (2.00) (1.00) 1.00 7.00 2.00 18.00 3.50 6.00 100 2.00 100 100 5.00 2.00 100 (5.00) (3.50) (1.00) (2.00) (100) 2.00 100 6.00 (1.00) I 2.00 3.00 300 1.00 400 1.00 100 (100) 100 1.00 (100) 1.00 -255- 5.00 .00.. J.OO 500. .,. --.. 2.06 3:66 100 6.00 .,00 .'., 3.00 300 .1.00..' '" ., 4.00 100 . I;', 100 100 , ,_I ,,, ' ~~~,..",..."...... - ::_;:_u. ---....--::::i:>: . ~~ . " .. ....,.....--.... ......... ..._----)-~,_._.__.... ...........#"....... ". .....;;;;..' ~ Senior Civil Engineer Senior Electrician Senior Engineering Technician Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Gardener Senior HVAC Technician Senior Landscape Inspector Senior Maintenance Worker Senior Office Specialist Senior Open Space Inspector Senior Park Ranger Senior Public Works Inspector Senior Public Works Specialist Senior Secretary Senior Tree Trimmer Signal Systems Engineer 1/11 Signing & Striping Supervisor Stormwater Compliance Inspector 1/11 Survey Technician 1/11 Traffic Devices Technician Traffic Devices Technician Supervisor Tree Trimmer Tree Trimmer Supervisor Wastewater Collections Manager 100 1,00 100 ,200 296 i.d 9.00 " :00 1 00 1.00 (3.00) ,11;00 (1 00) 1.00 .100 , foo 2.00 2.00: ., ,100 1 00 1.00 2.00 1.00 'I"'!;' ,'1 ~OO 1 ,00 .-, (1 00) 1 00 1.00 1 00 (1,00) ~OO L'.: ""'1'00' (1 00) 2.00' ,,' ; 1'.00 "il'l:h,I,". :'1',60 (0.25) 194.50 I 2.00 9 00 1 00 1400 2.00 1,00 1,00 2,00 , 'i 1.00 2.00 4,00 1,00 300 100 1.00 , !'" PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL 194.75 I RECREATION. 1 _ " ., Administrative Secretary Aquarist Aquatic Supervisor I Aquatic Supervisor II Aquatic Supervisor III Assistant Director Of Recreation Director of Recreation Fiscal & Management Analyst Nature Center Grounds Maintenance Specialist Nature Center Grounds Maintenance Worker Nature Center Program Manager Principal Recreation Manager Recreation Supervisor I Recreation Supervisor II Recreation Supervisor III 2.00 0.75 1,00 2,00 100 100 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2,00 6,00 6,00 7,00 ,256, ~ . _ _ AtJ~~_O~~'Z~!?~ip(j1S:I[lpJN-S:I~~_ r)EP~IlTM~~m -__. _j ;.......,. ,..c;" 'j,,-.'j "y; 5~~~,~C : .-hc....>.- Registered Veterinary Technician Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Office Specialist Senior Recreation Manager RECREATION TOTAL T-t!iift.~;;,"" 38.50 (1.00) (1.00) (12.50) LIBRARY; I I ___ _ Administrative Secretary Assistant Library Director Delivery Driver Deputy City Manager/Director of Library Director of Library Educational Services Supervisor Family and Youth Coordinator Librarian 1/11 Librarian III Library Administrative Coordinator Library Assistant Library Associate Library Digital Services Manager Library Technician Library Volunteer Coordinator Literacy & Programming Coordinator Principal Librarian Secretary Senior Educational Services Supervisor Senior Librarian Senior Office Specialist LIBRARY TOTAL 26.00 1.00 100 100 (1.00) (0.50) 1.00 (1.00) (300) 40.25 [, . , "., ,,< r'" '" ..., '~?;""7---~ "H~c7~-'-~'., -:~~T'\,~_._-!~,~~;, ::'""1'0;; "'~~ -,~E~;ER~~F~~D'~~~};;-TA_~~, __On ." _9~9.0~, .. 4.00 _lL,,'(?3.~0)~869;5,0~ 100 3.00 100 8.00 4.00 1.00 0.50 15.75 1.00 2.00 050 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 (1.00) 1.00 (100) (1.00) (100) (1.00) (2.00) (10.50) 50.75 DEVElOPMENT SERVICES FUND ~ -- - ~ Administrative Technician Assistant Director of Building & Housing Assistant Director of Planning Assistant Planner Associate Engineer Associate Planner Building Inspector 1/11 Building Inspector III 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 5.00 7.00 1.00 (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (2.00) (100) -257- ..;1;." ,'.,,'""" -,,!.., id'!, ";",'}'.'f'btf (i:1 - '1- -.'~ ~ .,.".;- ~ l.."'>:--:;'-"":-_- .~ -_-" 1;. ~ ... -:;-- ~~ ,--_ ! A,liJifliirO,R:I'ZEI)) P0Srt:n)I"ilSB~ 1~,EP~RJiM~Ni]f I . --- - -- - ~ - -- -<- _ _ _ _ I ~~OO) .~ D ~.....~ Deputy Building Official 1.00 Development Automation Specialist 1.00 (1.00) Development Planning Manager 100 Development Services Counter Manager 100 (1.00) Development Services Technician 1111 4.50 (2.50) Development Services Technician III 300 (1.00) Director of Planning & Building 100 (1.00) Engineering Technician 1/11 1.00 Landscape Architect 1.00 Landscape Planner 1111 3.00 Office Specialist 0.50 (0.50) Plans Examiner 3.00 Principal Planner 3.00 (1.00) Public Works Inspector 1111 500 (500) Secretary 1.00 Senior Administrative Secretary 1.00 (100) Senior Building Inspector 1.00 Senior Civil Engineer 3.00 (2.00) Senior Engineering Technician 100 Senior Landscape Inspector 1.00 (100) Senior Office Specialist 1.00 Senior Planner 5.00 (1.00) Senior Plans Examiner 1.00 (1.00) Senior Public Works Inspector 3.00 (3.00) Sen ior Secretary 2.00 (2.00) Transportation Engineer w/Certificate 1.00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUND TOTAL 70.00 (10.50) (20.50) 39.00 .P.ARKI,,!G ,\-tETER' L .~.. Parking Meter Technician 0.50 0.50 (0.50) (0.50) PARKING METER TOTAL o _ ~~. I POLICE BEPT GRA,NTS FUND CBAG Administrative Analyst II CBAG Analyst CBAG Budget Manager CBAG Deputy Executive Director CBAG Director of SO LECC CBAG Executive Assistant CBAG Executive Director CBAG Graphic Designer/Webmaster 1.00 3.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 (1.00) I. .258- ;' . . _ _ ~!0~tf;l6.R'IZE~ ,po~-~Ti6NS BY_ [)I:P~~Tr~E"Nlr u . - _~: i CBAG Lead Programmer Analyst CBAG Management Assistant CBAG Micro Computer Specialist CBAG Network Administrator IIII CBAG Network Manager CBAG Program Analyst CBAG Program Manager CBAG RCFL Network Engineer Peace Officer Police Community Relations Specialist Police Training and Development Supervisor Public Information Officer (PO) Public Safety Analyst POLICE DEPT GRANTS FUND TOTAL I o D 1.00 1.00 100 2.00 100 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 0.50 21,00 1.50 22,50 'ENVIRONMENtAi!SERVI~ES - . Environmental Services Program Manager Recycling Specialist 111I 100 2.00 3,00 1.00 1,00 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES TOTAL 4,00 _. to_ FLEET MANAGEMENT . 1.00 Equipment Maintenance Manager Equipment Mechanic Fire Apparatus Mechanic Fiscal Office Specialist Fleet Manager Mechanic Assistant Senior Equipment Mechanic 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 (1.00) FLEET MANAGEMENT TOTAL 2.00 1.00 10,00 10.00 . - , -TRANSI]" I' _ . .' , . - Administrative Technician Transit Manager Transit Operations Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 3,00 TRANSIT TOTAL 3.00 'SEWER " . ~ '1 Associate Engineer Engineering Technician 111I 2.00 2.00 -259- Equipment Operator Maintenance Worker 1111 Public Works Specialist Public Works Supervisor Senior Civil Engineer Senior Fiscal Office Specialist Senior Maintenance Worker 3.00 18.00 100 4.00 1.00 100 14.00 SEWER TOTAL 46.00 46.00 ~ -- ~ - ~ - - - - ~RED~"'EtOPME~ID {li:P.lo.tJ~ING .' . : Accountant 1.00 Assistant Director of Redevelopment and 1.00 Housing Director of Redevelopment and Housing 100 (100) (formerly Director of Community Development) Principal Project Coordinator 2.00 (1.00) Project Coordinator 1/11 4.00 (2.00) Redevelopment and Housing Manager 1.00 Senior Administrative Secretary 100 Senior Fiscal Office Specialist 1.00 Senior Project Coordinator 4.00 (1.00) Senior Secretary 1.00 (1.00) REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING TOTAL 17.00 (6.00) 11.00 TOTAL AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 1,109.50 (6.50) (98.00) 1,005.00 *FY 2009.10 Proposed Changes column includes implementation ofthe budget reduction plan. reorganization of Development & Maintenance services and Administration. various reclassifications, and new positions. .260. .."} " \, ~ ',f .."," ~ ."" "" ',.f ..<),11. "",' !.1- .;,' <II-all> if"""Th ,~ ;;;;i;,;;~;~(rC!j",i~;:,~':<;,~:;~,;;~ ,. ~ ~ ,;'~!~.i 1~ '" " .,,"~'.. ~ lr~~.~.~"7...;;~,:.. ,;("\,";;/11:1 ~'fl ,: I, "IJI r;.fr..., rl i ~ nv...~,~.. ""'I- -.;;e:.,- .,1. I ^ I,l': ~ ",-' 'IV.. "'/,; "j ,..... , ",Ii1r..<!lcfk>,;":)s"."1.1nl.l' '''''".,''.il ,) Ik", J..,.~, 1. ,W "lJ.~~'" .j, ~ ..' PROPOSED BUDGET APPEND!X Budget Process Fiscal Policies Investment Policies Debt Administration Gann Appropriations Limit Legal Debt Margin List of Acronyms Glossary Chula Vista at a Glance -261- Un the development of the fiscal year 2009-10 I budget the City incorporated additional budget workshops with Council, community groups and employees in order to improve communication and transparency. The budget process began in November 2008 with the identification of a $4.0 million deficit in the 2008-09 fiscal year that was projected to grow to an approximately $20.0 million deficit for fiscal year 2009-10. In order to mitigate the estimated deficits, City departments began a comprehensive process to develop a budget reduction plan. This process began with briefings of city employees, labor groups, the media and City Council. Following the BUDGET PROCESS BUDGET CALENDAR October & November: Revenue and expenditure projections prepared by Finance arid depat1ments, resulting in the preliminary baseline budget November: Analysis of baseline bUdget to determine budgetary gap, development of budget balancing plan December & January: Council review of budget balancing strategy ,April &, May: Develop"!"!nt of City Manager's proposed budget and' implementation of Budget Reduction Plan , th. ' May 26 - Budget submitted to City Council June 9th - Public budget hearings and recommended adoption of final budget ' initial briefings was the establishment of an employee focus group to generate cost saving ideas, as well as several community workshops. The Budget Reduction Plan was presented to the City Council at several Council meetings in December 2008. The City Council approved the Budget Reduction Plan on January 13, 2009. On May 26th, the City Manager transmitted the proposed budget to the City Council for review. A budget workshop will be held for the benefit of the public and City Council on June 16th at which time the City Council will consider the adoption of the budget. Copies of the proposed budget will be made available for public review in the Office of the City Clerk and City libraries approximately 2 weeks prior to the June 9th public hearing. -263- As set forth in the City Charter, at any meeting after the adoption of the budget, the City Council may amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by affirmative votes of at least four members. Throughout the year, the Finance Department provides Council with quarterly fiscal status reports comparing expenditure and revenue projections to budgeted amounts, highlighting any variances and recommending corrective actions as necessary. General Fund Budget Development Milestones . November 17, 2008 At the first Council Budget Workshop, an overview of the fiscal year 2009-10 budget was presented to City Council in conjunction with an updated 5-year forecast and budget balancing options. . December 4, 2008 At the second Council Budget Workshop, the proposed Budget Reduction Plan was presented The primary purpose of the workShOp was to review the proposal and receive Council feedback. These discussions were continued to the council meetings of December 9 and December 16, 2008, and January 6, 2009. . January 13, 2009 The City Council approved the Budget Reduction Plan at which time the implementation of a majority of the plan moved forward. . May 12,2009 An overview of the fiscal year 2009-10 proposed operating and capital improvement budgets were presented to the City Council. . May 26, 2009 As required by City Charter, the City Manager's proposed budget was submitted to the City Council at least thirty-five days before the beginning of the fiscal year. Copies of the proposed budget will be made available for public review in the Office of the City Clerk and City libraries at least ten days before the public hearings, as required by City Charter. -264- o June 9, 2009 A public hearing will be held before Council considers the adoption of the budget in order to give residents an additional opportunity to participate in the budget process. In compliance with the City Charter, a notice of these meetings will be published in the local newspaper at least ten days prior to the public hearings Adoption of the budget requires the affirmative votes of at least three members of the Council. -265- -266- FISCAL POLICIES This section of the budget document reiterates the fiscal policies that were reviewed and acknowledged by the City Council in January 2000. These policies form the overall framework within which the operating budget was formulated. The fiscal policies. most of which are already codified ill one form or another, are not considered new or controversial, but are summarized here to assist you to better understand the basis for the resource allocation decisions that were made. A. General 1. The City's financial assets will be managed in a sound and prudent manner in order to ensure the continued viability of the organization. 2. A comprehensive operating and capital budget for all City funds will be developed annually and presented to the City Council for approval. The purpose of the annual budget will be to: a. Identify community needs for essential services. b. Identify the programs and specific activities required to provide these essential services. c. Establish program poliCies and goals that define the nature and level of program services required. d Identify alternatives for improving the delivery of program services. e. Identify the resources required to fund identified programs and activities, and enable accomplishment of program objectives. f. Set standards to facilitate the measurement and evaluation of program performance .267. 3. The City's annual operating budget will be balanced whereby planned expenditures do not exceed anticipated revenues. 4. Recurring revenues will fund recurring expenditures. One-time revenues will be used for capital, reserve augmentation, or other non-recurring expenditures. 5 Accounting systems will be maintained in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. 6. Investment policy and practice will be in accordance with State statutes that emphasize safety and liquidity over yield, including quarterly status reports to the City Council. (Council Policy) 7. City operations will be managed and budgets prepared with the goal of maintaining an available fund balance in the General Fund of no less than eight percent of the General Fund operating budget. (Council Policy) 8. General Fund fiscal status reports reflecting comparisons of actual and projected performance with budget allocations for both revenues and expenditures will be presented to the City Council on a quarterly basis (City Charter) B. Revenue 1. The City will endeavor to maintain a diversified and stable revenue base in order to minimize the impact to programs from short-term economic fluctuations. 2. Revenue projections will be maintained for the current year and four future fiscal years, and estimates will be based on a conservative, analytical, and objective process. 3. In order to maintain maximum flexibility, except as required by law or the funding source, the City will avoid earmarking any unrestricted revenues for a specific purpose or program. 4. User fees will be imposed when appropriate and set at a level to recover the full cost of services provided which are of a special b'enefit to easily identified individuals or groups. 5. User fees will be reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis to ensure that program costs continue to be recovered and that the fees reflect changes in levels of service delivery. -268- 6. The City will recover the cost of new facilities and infrastructure necessitated by new development consistent with State law and the City's Growth Management Program. Development Impact Fees will be closely monitored and updated to insure that they are maintained at a level adequate to recover costs (GMOC Ordinance) 7. When considering new development alternatives, the City will attempt to determine the fiscal impact of proposed projects, annexations, etc. and insure that mechanisms are put in place to provide funding for any projected negative impacts on City operations. (GMOC Ordinance) c. Expenditures 1 Budgetary control will be exercised at the Department/category level, meaning that each department is authorized to spend up to the total amount appropriated for that department within the expenditure categories of Personnel Costs, Supplies & Services, Other Charges, Utilities, and Capital. Transfers of appropriations between expenditure categories of up to $15,000 may be approved by the City Manager. Transfers of appropriations between expenditure categories in excess of $15,000, or between departments require City Council approval. (City Charter & Council Policy) 2. Appropriations, other than for capital projects, remaining unspent at the end of any fiscal year will be cancelled and returned to Available Fund Balance with the exception of any appropriations encumbered as the result of a valid purchase order or as approved for a specific project or purpose by the City Councilor the City Manager. Appropriations for capital projects will necessarily be carried over from year to year until the project is deemed to be complete. (Council Policy) 3. The City will establish and maintain equipment replacement and facility maintenance funds as deemed necessary to ensure that monies are set aside and available to fund ongoing replacement needs. 4. The City will attempt to compensate non-safety employees at rates above the middle of the labor market as measured by the median rate for similar jurisdictions. (Council Policy) -269- D. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Major capital projects will be included in a CIP Budget reflecting a five-year period. The CIP budget will be updated annually and presented to City Council for approval. Resources will be formally appropriated (budgeted) for the various projects on an annual basis in accordance with the five-year plan. E. Capital Financing & Debt Management 1. The City will consider the use of debt financing only for one-time capital improvement projects when the project's useful life will exceed the term of the financing and when resources are identified sufficient to fund the debt service requirements. The only exception to this limitation is the issuance of short-term instruments such as tax and revenue anticipation notes, which will only be considered in order to meet legitimate cash flow needs occurring within a fiscal year. 2. The City will attempt to limit the total amount of annual debt service payments guaranteed by the General Fund to no more than ten percent of estimated General Fund revenues. 3. The City will consider requests from developers for the use of debt financing secured by property based assessments or special taxes in order to provide for necessary infrastructure for new development only under strict guidelines adopted by Council, which may include minimum value-to-lien ratios and maximum tax burdens. (Community Facility District Ordinance) 4. The City will strive to minimize borrowing costs by: a. Seeking the highest credit rating possible. b. Procuring credit enhancement such as letters of credit or insurance, when cost effective. c. Maintaining good communications with credit rating agencies regarding the City's fiscal condition. .5. The City will diligently monitor its compliance with bond legal covenants, including adherence to continuing disclosure requirements and federal arbitrage regulations. 6. In addition to externally financed debt, the City utilizes inter-fund loans whenever possible to reduce borrowing costs or provide for shorter term loans. When interest is charged on internal loans, it is done at the same rate the City earns from its investments. -270- INVESTMENT POLICIES 1.0 Purpose: This "Investment Policy and Guidelines" (the "Investment Policy") Policy is intended to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of the City of Chula Vista's (the "City") cash balances, and outline policies to assist in maximizing the efficiency of the City's cash management system, while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City. 2.0 Policy: The investment practices and policies of the City of Chula Vista are based upon state law and prudent money management. The primary goals of these practices are: A. To ensure compliance with all Federal, State, and local laws governing the investment of public funds under the control of the Director of FinancelTreasurer. B. To protect the principal monies entrusted to the City's Finance Department. C. Achieve a reasonable rate of return within the parameters of prudent risk management while minimizing the potential for capital losses arising from market changes or issuer default. 3.0 Scope: This. Investment Policy applie? to all financial assets ot the City of Chula Vista, as indicated in 3.1 below. These funds are accounted for in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. -271- 3.1 Funds: The Director of Finance/Treasurer is responsible for investing the unexpended cash in the City Treasury for all funds, except for the employee's retirement funds, which are administered separately, and those funds which are managed separately by trustees appointed under indenture agreements. The Director of Finance/Treasurer will strive to maintain the level of investment of this cash as close as possible to 100%. These funds are described in the City's annual financial report and include: . General Fund . Special Revenue Funds . Capital Project Funds . Enterprise Funds . Trust and Agency Funds . Any new fund created by the legislative body, unless specifically exempted This Investment Policy applies to all transactions involving the financial assets and related activity of the foregoing funds. 4.0 Prudence: The standard of prudence to be used by the Director of Finance/Treasurer shall be the "prudent investor standard". This shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio The "prudent investor standard" is applied to local agencies, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53600.3 which provides, in pertinent part: all governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing public funds pursuant to this chapter are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard. When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the agency, that a prudent person . . acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency. ..." -272- 4.1 Personal Responsibility: The Director of Finance/Treasurer, Assistant Director of Finance and Treasury Manager as investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the Investment Policy and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported to the City Council in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. 5.0 Objective: Consistent with this aim, investments are made under the terms and conditions of California Government Code Section 53600, et seq. Criteria for selecting investments and the absolute order of priority are: 5.1 Safety: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City of Chula Vista shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. To attain this objective, diversification is required in order that potential losses on individual securities do not exceed the income generated from the remainder of the portfolio. 5.2 Liquidity: The City of Chula Vista's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated and to maintain compliance with any indenture agreement, as applicable Liquidity is essential to the safety of principal. 5.3 Return on Investments: The City of Chula Vista's investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market-average rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles (market interest rates), within the City's Investment Policy's risk parameters and the City's cash flow needs. See also Section 16.1. 6.0 Delegation of Authority: The Director of FinancelTreasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials. The responsibility for the day-to-day investment of City funds will be delegated to the Treasury Manager under the general direction of the Assistant Director of Finance. -273- 7.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest: In addition to state and local statutes relating to conflicts of interest, all persons involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could confiict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officers are required to file annual disclosure statements as required for "public officials who manage public investments" [as defined and required by the Political Reform Act and related regulations, including Government Code Sections 81000, et seq., and the rules, regulations and guidelines promulgated by California's Fair Political Practices Commission (FFPC)]. 8.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions: The City's Director of FinancelTreasurer will maintain a list of the financial institutions and brokers/dealers authorized to provide investment and depository services and will perform an annual review of the financial condition and registrations of qualified bidders and require annual audited financial statements to be on file for each company. The City will utilize Moody's Securities or other such services to determine financially sound institutions with which to do business The City shall annually send a copy of the current Investment Policy to all financial institutions and brokers/dealers approved to do business with the City. As far as possible, all money belonging to, or in the custody of, a local agency, including money paid to the City's Director of FinancelTreasurer or other official to pay the principal, interest, or penalties of bonds, shall be deposited for safekeeping in state or national banks, savings associations, federal associations, credit unions, or federally insured industrial loan companies in this state selected by the City's Director of Finance/Treasurer; or may be invested in the investments set forth in Section 9.0. To be eligible to receive local agency money, a bank, savings association, federal association, or federally insured industrial loan company shall have received an overall rating of not less than "satisfactory" in its most recent evaluation by the appropriate federal financial supervisory agency of its record of meeting the credit needs of California's communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. To provide for the optimum yield in the investment of City funds, the City's investment procedures shall encourage competitive bidding on transactions from approved brokers/dealers. In order to be approved by the City, the dealer must meet the following criteria: (i) the dealer must be a "primary" dealer or regional dealer that qualifies under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15C3-1 (Uniform Net Capital Rule); (ii)the dealer's institution must have an office in California, (iii)the dealer -274- must be experienced in institutional trading practices and familiar with the California Government Code as related to investments appropriate for the City; and (iv) all other applicable criteria, as may be established in the investment procedures. All brokers/dealers and financial institutions who desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must submit a "BrokerlDealer Application" and related documents relative to eligibility including a current audited annual financial statement, U4 form for the broker, proof of state registration, proof of National Association of Securities Dealers certification and a certification of having read and understood the City's Investment Policy and agreeing to comply with the Investment Policy. The City's Director of Finance/Treasurer shall determine if they are adequately capitalized (i.e. minimum capital requirements of $10,000,000 and five years of operation). 9.0 Authorized & Suitable Investments: The Chy is authorized by California Government Code Section 53600, et. seq., to invest in specific types of securities. Investments not specifically listed below are deemed inappropriate and prohibited: A. BANKERS' ACCEPTANCES, maximum 25% of portfolio (up to 40% with Council approval). Maximum term 180 days. Banks must have a short term rating of at least AI/PI and a long-term rating of A or higher as provided by Moody's Investors Service or Standard and Poor's Corp. No more than 30% of the agency's money may be invested in the bankers' acceptances of any one commercial bank pursuant to this section. B. NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT, maximum 30% of portfolio. Maximum term 3 years, (Up to 5 years with Council approval). Banks must have a short term rating of AI/PI and a long term rating of at least a single A from a nationally recognized authority on ratings. C. COMMERCIAL PAPER, maximum 25% of portfolio. Maximum term 270 days. Commercial paper of prime quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and number rating as provided for by Moody's Investor Services, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Financial Services. The issuing corporation must be organized and operating within the United States, with total assets in excess of $500 million and shall issue debt, other than commercial paper, that is rated "A" or higher bY Moody's, S&P and FitCh. Split ratings (i.e. A2/PI) are not allowable. No' more than 10% of the outstanding commercial paper of any single corporate issue may be purchased. D. BONDS ISSUED BY THE CITY OR ANY LOCAL AGENCY WITHIN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. -275- Bonds must have an "A" rating or better from a nationally recognized authority on ratings E. OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES TREASURY United States Treasury Notes, bonds, bills or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. There is no limit on the pE;rcentage of the portfolio that can be invested in this category. F. FEDERAL AGENCIES Debt instruments issued by agencies of the Federal government. Though not general obligations of the U.S. Treasury, such securities are sponsored by the government or related to the government and, therefore, have high safety ratings. The following are authorized Federal Intermediate Credit Bank (FICB). Federal Land Bank (FLB), Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), Tennessee Valley Authorities (TVA). Student Loan Association Notes (SLMA) and Small Business Administration (SBA). There is no limit on the percentage of the portfolio that can be invested in this category. G. REPURCHASE AGREEMENT, maximum term 3 months. Investments in repurchase agreements may be made, on any investment authorized in this section, when the term of the agreement does not exceed 3 months. A Master Repurchase Agreement must be signed with the bank or broker/dealer who is selling the securities to the City. H. REVERSE-REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS (Requires Council approval for each transaction) Reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending agreements may be utilized only when all of the following conditions are met: a) The security to be sold on reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement has been owned and fully paid for by the local agency for a minimum of 3D days prior to sale. b) The total of all reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements on investments owned by the local agency does not exceed 20% of the base value of the portfolio. c) The agreement does not exceed a term of 92 days, unless the agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the same security. -276- d) Funds obtained or funds within the pool of an equivalent amount to that obtained from selling a security to a counter party by way of a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, shall not be used to purchase another security with a maturity longer than 92 days from the initial settlement date of the reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, unless the reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the same security. Investments in reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements, or similar investments in which the local agency sells securities prior to purchase with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the security shall only be made with primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or with a nationally or state-chartered bank that has or has had a significant banking relationship with a local agency. e) For purposes of this chapter, "significant banking relationship" means any of the following activities of a bank: i. Involvement in the creation, sale, purchase, or retirement of a local agency's bonds, warrants, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness. ii. Financing of a local agency's activities. iii. Acceptance of a local agency's securities or funds as deposits. I. MEDIUM-TERM CORPORATE NOTES, maximum 20% of portfolio (30% with Council approval), with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less. Notes eligible for investment shall be "A" rated or its equivalent or better as determined by a nationally recognized rating service. J. TIME DEPOSITS-CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (non-negotiable certificates of deposit.) Maximum of 3 years Deposits must be made with banks or savings & loan that have a short term rating of AI/PI or a long term rating of at least a single A from a generally recognized authority on.ratings. K. OBLIGATIONS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Obligations must be "A" rated or better from a nationally recognized authority on ratings. -277- L. MONEY MARKET FUNDS, maximum 15% of portfolio. (Requires Council approval for each transaction) No more than 10% of the agency's surplus funds may be invested in shares of beneficial interest of anyone Money Market fund, Local agencies may invest in "shares of beneficial interest" issued by diversified management companies which invest only in direct obligations in U.S. Treasury bills, notes and bonds, and repurchase agreements with a weighted average of 60 days or less. They must have the highest rating from two national rating agencies, must maintain a daily principal per share value of $1.00 per share and distribute interest monthly, and must have a minimum of $500 million in assets under management. The purchase price of the shares may not include commission. M. THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) LAIF is a special fund of the California State Treasury through which any local government may pool investments. The City may invest up to $40 million in this fund. Currently, the City has established two (2) agency funds through which the Director of FinancelTreasurer may invest the unexpended cash for all funds: The City of Chula Vista City Fund, and the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency Fund. Investments in LAIF are highly liquid and may be converted to cash within 24 hours. N. INVESTMENT TRUST OF CALIFORNIA (CAL TRUST) The City may invest in shares of beneficial interest issued by the Investment Trust of California (CaITRUST), a local government investment pool established by local entities as a joint powers authority pursuant to California Government Code Sections 6509.7 and 53601 (p), provided: . CalTRUST investments are limited to the securities and obligations authorized for local agency investment pursuant to Subdivisions (a) to (n), inclusive, of California Government Code Section 53601; and . CalTRUST shall have retained an investment adviser that: . Is registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission; . Has not less than five years experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized for local agency investment pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (n), inclusive, of California Government Code Section 53601; and . Has assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). 9.1 Investment Pools: The City's Director of FinancelTreasurer or designee shall be required to investigate all local -278- government investment pools and money market mutual funds prior to investing and performing at least a quarterly review thereafter while the City is invested in the pool or the money market fund. LAIF is authorized under provisions in Section 16429.1 of the California Government Code as an allowable investment for local agencies even though some of the individual investments of the pool are not allowed as a direct investment by a local agency. 10.0 Portfolio Adjustments: Should any investment listed in section 9.0 exceed a percentage-of-portfolio limitation due to an incident such as fluctuation in portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to maturity to avoid losses. When no loss is indicated, the Director of Finance/Treasurer shall consider reconstructing the portfolio basing his or her decision on the expected length of time the portfolio will be unbalanced. If this occurs, the City Council shall be notified. 11.0 Collateralization: Under provisions of the California Government Code, California banks, and savings and loan associations are required to secure the City's deposits by pledging government securities with a value of 110 % of principal and accrued interest. California law also allows financial institutions to secure City deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the City's total deposits. Collateral will always be held by an independent third party. A clearly marked evidence of ownership (safekeeping receipt) must be supplied to the City and retained. The market value of securities that underlay a repurchase agreement shall be valued at 102% or greater of the funds borrowed against those securities and the value shall be adjusted no less than quarterly. Since the market value of the underlying securities is subject to daily market fluctuations, the investments in repurchase agreements shall be in compliance if the value of the underlying securities is brought back up to 102% no later than the next business day. The Director of Finance/Treasurer, at his or her discretion, may waive the collateral requirement for deposits that are fully insured up to $100,000 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The right of collateral substitution is granted. 12.0 Safekeeping and Custody: All City investments shall identify the City of Chula Vista as the registered owner, and all interest and principal payments and withdrawals shall indicate the City of Chula Vista as the payee. All securities shall be safe kept with the City itself or with a qualified financial institution, contracted by the City as a third party. All agreements and statements will be subject to review annually by external auditors in conjunction with their audit. In the event that the City has a financial institution -279- hold the securities, a separate custodial agreement shall be required. All securities shall be acquired by the safekeeping institution on a "Delivery-Vs-Payment" (DVP) basis. For Repurchase Agreements, the purchase may be delivered by book entry, physical delivery or by third-party custodial agreement consistent with the Government Code. The transfer of securities to the counter party bank's customer book entry account may be used for book entry delivery. 13.0 Diversification: The City's investment portfolio will be diversified to avoid Incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks associated with concentrating investments in specific security types, maturity segment, or in individual financial institutions. With the exception of U.S. Treasury securities and authorized pools, no more than 60% of the total investment portfolio will be invested in a single security type or with a single financial institution. In addition, no more than 10% of the investment portfolio shall be in securities of anyone issuer except for U.S. Treasuries and U.S. Government Agency issues. A. Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the insurer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing in those securities with an "A" or above rating and approved in the Investment Policy and by diversifying the investment portfolio so that the failure of anyone issuer would not unduly harm the City's cash flow. B. Market risk, defined as the risk of market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by structuring the portfolio so that securities mature at the same time that major cash outflows occur, thus eliminating the need to sell securities prior to their maturity. It is explicitly recognized herein, however, that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured losses are inevitable and must be considered within the context of overall investment return. The City's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated. 14.0 Maximum Maturities: To the extent possible, the City will attempt to match its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements. Unless matched to a specific cash flow, the City will not directly invest in securities maturing more than Jive (5) years from the date of purchase, unless, the legislative bOdy has granted express authority to make that investment either specifically, or as a part of an investment program approved by the City Council. -280- 15.0 Internal Control: The Director of FinancelTreasurer shall establish a system of internal controls designed to prevent Joss of public funds due to fraud, employee error, misrepresentation by third parties, or unanticipated market changes. No investment personnel may engage in an investment transaction except as provided for under the terms of this Investment Policy and the procedure established by the Director of FinancelTreasurer. The external auditors shall annually review the investments with respect to the Investment Policy. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with policies and procedures for the investments that are selected for testing. Additionally, account reconciliation and verification of general ledger balances relating to the purchasing or maturing of investments and allocation of investments to fund balances shall be performed by the Finance Department and approved by the Director of Finance/Treasurer. To provide further protection of City funds, written procedures prohibit the wiring of any City funds without the authorization of at least two of the following four designated City staff: 1. Director of Finance/Treasurer 2. Assistant Director of Finance 3. Treasury Manager 4. Fiscal Operations Manager 16.0 Performance Standards: This Investment Policy shall be reviewed at least annually by the Director of FinancelTreasurer to ensure its consistency with the overall objective of preservation of principal, liquidity, and return, and its relevance to current law and financial and economic trends. All financial assets of all other funds shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this Investment Policy. The monies entrusted to the Director of FinancelTreasurer will be held in a passively managed ("hold to maturity") portfolio. However, the Director of FinancelTreasurer will use best efforts to observe, review, and react to changing conditions that affect the portfolio, and to do so in a manner that is consistent with this Investment Policy. 16.1 Market Yield (Benchmark): The investment portfolio shall be managed to attain a market-average rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the City's investment risk constraints and cash flow. Investment return becomes a consideration only after the basic requirements of investment -281- safety and liquidity have been met. Because the investment portfolio is designed to operate on a 'hold-to-maturity' premise (or passive investment style) and because of the safety, liquidity, and yield priorities, the performance benchmark that will be used to determine whether market yields are being achieved shall be the average of the monthly LAIF rate and the 12-month rolling average 2 - Year Constant Maturity Treasury (CMT) rate. While the City will not make investments for the purpose of trading or speculation as the dominant criterion, the Director of Finance/Treasurer shall seek to enhance total portfolio return by means of ongoing portfolio and cash management. The prohibition of highly speculative investments precludes pursuit of gain or profit through unusual risk and precludes investments primarily directed at gains or profits from conjectural fluctuations in market prices. The Director of FinancelTreasurer will not directly pursue any investments that are leveraged or deemed derivative in nature. However, as long as the original investments can be justified by their ordinary earning power, trading in response to changes in market value can be used as part of on-going portfolio management. 17.0 Reporting: The Director of FinancelTreasurer shall submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council and City Manager following the end of each quarter. This report will include the following elements: . Type of investment . Institutional Issuer . Purchase Date . Date of maturity . Amount of deposit or cost of the investment . Face value of the investrnent . Current market value of securities and source of valuation . Rate of interest . Interest earnings . Statement relating the report to its compliance with the Statement of Investment Policy or the manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance . Statement on availability of funds to meet the next six month's obligations . Monthly and Year-to-date Budget Amounts for Interest Income . Percentage of Portfolio by Investment Type . Days to Maturity for all Investments . Comparative report on Monthly Investment Balances & Interest Yields . Monthly transactions -282- This quarterly investment report shall be an information item for the City Council and City Manager. In addition, a commentary on capital markets and economic conditions may be included with the report. 18.0 Investment Policy Adoption: By virtue of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, the Council shall acknowledge the receipt and filing of this annual statement of Investment Policy for the respective fiscal year. -283- "~ 'If~ J;fh'" " \.' (( ,. ~>;';'%" ~ f ". Jl"<'\'!'L~L", 'ii; ~", nrv flf..' m >:.,. -", ,":._"." ~"""'H" "J' Iii J ~,~" t\' '@./r~,.~.;[' A' ,( ',. t; t~ . r:; _: '''1 ri,: ":\ <::: _:~ ':.'. '"j,..,~ -f";' ; " ltlb;;/- \; F '<>:,,,,!i t."",;" 1n ,;> ~!" t;;u>"i lil Ji \} .284. DEBT ADMINISTRATION Based on the audited financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2008, the City and the Redevelopment Agency (Agency) had borrowed funds through several long-term debt issues and had other obligations to be funded over a period of time longer than one year, which can be categorized as follows: Description Tax Allocation Bonds Pension Obligation Bonds Certificates of Participation Bond Premium Bond Discount Capital Leases Notes/Loans Payable CDBG Section 108 Loan Miscellaneous Claims Payable Compensated Absences (Employee Leave) Subtotal Advances from other Funds Total Long Term Debt Amount Outstanding $40,185,000 8,820,000 135,045,000 30,712 (457,704) 2,211,933 1,589,326 9,500,000 15,667,881 6,430,075 $219,022,223 49,414.199 $268 436 422 The Long-Term Debt total reflects a decrease of $0.4 million when compared to the June 2007 amount. The decrease is due to combination of a net increase in long-term debt of $4.0 million offset by a decrease in Advances from other Funds of $4.4 million. The additions to the City's long- term debt include a $9.5 million loan from the U S. Department of Housing and Urban Development secured by the City's Community Development Block Grant. In addition, the City entered into a 5- -285- year lease purchase agreement ($0.8 million) for medical resuscitation equipment for use by the fire Department. Tax Allocation Bonds ($40.2 million) Tax Allocation Bonds (TABS) are issued by the Agency and utilize tax increment revenue for debt service. The 2006 Senior TABS, Series A and 2006 Subordinate TABS, Series B were issued to refund the 1994 TABS Series A, C and D that were issued to refund prior obligations of the Bayfront and Town Center 1 project areas. The 2000 TABS were issued by the Southwest, Otay Valley and Town Center 2 project areas to finance certain redevelopment activities in those areas. Pension Obliqation Bonds ($8.8 million) The Pension Obligation Bonds represent money borrowed in 1994 to allow the City to pay down the liability to the Public Employees' Retirement System that had accumulated over many years, and for which the City was being charged a higher interest rate than was obtained by this borrowing. Certificates of Participation ($135.0 million) As of June 30, 2008, the City currently has five outstanding Certificates of Participation. The Chula Vista Public Financing Authority (Authority) issued the 2000 COP to finance improvements to the City's 800-megahertz emergency communications system and the City's Corporation yard. The 2002 COP was issued to finance the cost of constructing the City's Police Facility. In May 2003, the Authority issued the 2003 Refunding COP to defease the 1993 Refunding COP and the 1993 COP and reimburse the City for amounts it has advanced to prepay an equipment lease. The 2004 COP was issued to finance the Phase 1 reconstruction, renovation and equipping of the City's Civic Center Complex. In March 2006, the Authority issued the 2006 COP to finance the Phase 2 construction and equipping of certain improvements to the Civic Center Complex of the City and other existing City Facilities. Bond Premium ($30,712) This is .the premium on the issuance of the 2004 COP Civic Center Phase 1. Original amount was $35,324. This amount is amortized over 30 years. -286- Bond Discount (-$457,704) This is the discount on the issuance of the 2006 Refunding TABS. Original amount was $505,884. This amount is amortized over 20 years. Capital Leases ($2.2 million) The Capital Leases represent three long-term lease-purchase obligations for the San Diego County Regionalized Communications System and for replacement of the library's computerized catalog and circulation system and the 5-year lease purchase agreement for medical resuscitation equipment for use by the fire Department. Notes/Loans Payable ($1.6 million) The Agency participated in a Loan Agreement with the California Statewide Communities Development Authority to finance the 2005 and 2006 share of the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) payments to the County Auditor ($765,000 and $930,000 respectively). In January 1994, the City entered into a note payable with a private party in order to purchase certain land for the ultimate purpose of constructing a three-level parking structure. Miscellaneous Loans Payable ($15.7 million) The Miscellaneous Claims Payable represents the probable amount of loss as estimated by legal counsel and risk management staff due to worker's compensation and general liability claims filed against the City. Compensated Absences ($6.4 million) The obligation for Compensated Absences represents the current dollar value of accumulated leave balances, primarily vacation leave, for employees that would have to be paid off if all employees terminated for whatever reason as of June 30, 2008. Advances From Other Funds ($49.4 million) Advances from Other Funds include obligations related to' the Agency. The balance includes $4.5 million of funds loaned from the BayfrontlTown Center 1 Project Area to various Capital Project Funds. In addition, the Agency has entered into various loans and obligations covered under reimbursement agreements with the City totaling $26.3 million for certain lease payments and $4.5 -287- million for operating purposes. These obligations have been incurred to support various redevelopment activities throughout the City. The Trunk Sewer Fund has advanced to the Salt Creek DIF $13.3 million for major sewer projects needed to support continued growth. The Corporation Yard Relocation fund advanced $0.9 million to the General Fund for the Animal Shelter expansion. General Fund Lonq-Term Debt for Fiscal Year 2009-10 The General Fund's annual debt service "commitment" in fiscal year 2009-10 is approximately $122 million, or approximately 9.2% of the General Fund operating budget. However, it must be noted that although this amount is truly a General Fund commitment, only $6.3 million will actually be paid from General Fund resources, with the remaining $5 9 million paid from development impact fees, residential construction tax and various other funding sources. The $6.3 million represents approximately 4.4% of the General Fund operating budget, which would be considered more of an average debt burden for a local governmental entity. Annual Debt Service Obligation of the General Fund Fiscal Years 2003-04 through 2010-11 <Jl $14 '" 0 ~ $12 $10 ------ $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 D Civic Center Parking - Notes payable el800 Mhz - County Buy-in a Shopping Mall COP/2003 Ref COP 1!I Pension Obligation Bonds a Financial Systems/2003 Ref COP iii Palomar Trolley Commercial [J Safety CAD/MDT System/2003 Ref COP . Library System - Capital Lease 13800 Mhz Radio System/2003 Ref COP II Corporation Yard - 2000 COP 111800 Mhz Equipment - 2000 COP IilPolice Facility - 2002 COP IIIWestern CV Park/Drainage 2004 COP aCivic Center Expansion 2004 COP a Civic Center Expansion 2006 COP -288- GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, approved by the voters in 1979, imposed the concept of spending limits on local governments. This Constitutional provision and related implementing legislation specifies that annual increases in appropriations financed from "Proceeds of Taxes" are limited to a base year (1978-79) amount increased annually by an inflation factor comprised of the change in population of the City combined with the greater of the change in new non-residential construction or the change in the California per capita personal income. By definition, "Proceeds of Taxes" includes such revenues as property taxes, sales and use taxes, utility users taxes, transient occupancy taxes, and state subventions. Revenues from other sources like fees/charges and federal grants are considered "Non-Proceeds of Taxes" and are not subject to the annual spending limit. This calculation has always been perfunctory for the City of Chula Vista, since the proceeds of taxes for the City are far less than the statutory appropriation limit. The State Department of Finance and the San Diego County Assessor's Office are charged with providing the data necessary for local jurisdictions to establish their appropriation limit. According to these sources, for purposes of the fiscal year 2008-09 calculation, the population increased 1.51% and California per capita personal income increased by 4.29%. New non-residential construction increased 16.86% and was used in the formula to compute the limit since this increase was higher than the increase in California per capita personal income. -289- The fiscal year 2008-09 Appropriation Limit has been calculated as follows. Fiscal Year 2007-08 Appropriation Limit $511,957,324 Increased by an inflation factor composed of the increases in population and per capita income change X 11862 Fiscal Year 2008-09 Appropriations Limit $607.303.566 The "Proceeds of Taxes" as included in the fiscal year 2008-09 Proposed Budget that are subject to the appropriations limit are estimated to be $92,391,854. Therefore the City has what is referred to as an appropriation "gap" of $514,911,712 ($607,303,566 - $92,391,854) Simply stated, this means that the City could collect and spend up to $514,911,712 more in taxes during Fiscal Year 2008-2009 without exceeding the Constitutional limit. t/l $700 c: .2 $600 :!: $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $- Proceeds of Taxes Compared to Legal Spending Limit FY 02-03 FY 03-04 FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 I!ia!I!iI Proceeds of Taxes -+-Limit -290- LEGAL DEBT MARGIN Under State law, the City has a legal debt limitation not to exceed 15% of the total assessed valuation of taxable property within City boundaries. As of June 30, 2009 the City's legal debt limit is $3,693,009,150. In accordance with California Government Code Section 43605, only the City's general obligation bonds are subject to this limit. As the City of Chula Vista currently has no General Obligation Bonds outstanding it is not at risk of exceeding the legal limit. The table below summarizes the City's debt limit margin. Computation of Debt Limit Margin Fiscal Years Ended 2007 through 2009 Total Assessed Valuation June 30, 2007 $ 21,340,592,935 $ June 30, 2008 24,358,502,560 $ June 30, 2009 24,620,061,000 Debt Limitation-15% of Assessed Valuation Less: General Obligation Bonds Outstanding Legal Debt Margin $ 3,201,088,940 $ $ $ $ 3,201,088,940 $ 3,653,775,384 $ $ 3,653,775,384 $ 3,693,009,150 3,693,009,150 -291- ~ fl ~hrij 1~1 I;:i:b" 4il\~: "~"''''''' kl,; ~"",~ U. ;mmt"i'Jmillm~riiu' crnr tiOf: r i" ~~j}~, '''"~I"~ ~~~" r, ,l\,,~ ~";';~;".., ' 4 .." ;,.,"".;'; ,,;,,;, Ii; i'. -292- LIST OF ACRONYMS ADA - American with Disabilities Act ALS - Advanced Life Support ASSE - American Society of Safety Engineers BLS - Basic Life Support BPS - Building Project Supervisor BCT - Bayfront Conservancy Trust BPM - Building Project Manager BRT - Business Response Team CAD - Computer Aided Dispatch CAFR - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CalPERS - California Public Employees Retirement System CAST - Citizens Adversity Support Team CBAG - California Border Alliance Group CDBG - Community Development Block Grant CDFG - California Department of Fish and-Game CD-ROM - Compact Disk Read Only Memory CEO - Chief Executive Officer CES - Conservation Environmental Services -293- CHIP - Community Housing Improvement Program CIP - Capitallmprovernent Plan/Project/Program CLSA - California Library Services Act CMP - Corrugated Metal Pipe COP - Community Oriented Policing COPS MORE - Community Oriented Policing Services Making Officer Redeployment Effective CPI - Consumer Price Index CSO - Community Service Officer CSR - Customer Service Representative CVRC - Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation CVT - Chula Vista Transit DASH - Dynamic After School Hours DDA - Disposition and Development Agreement DIF - Development Impact Fee EDC - Economic Development Commission EDS - Economic Development Strategy EMS - Emergency Medical Services ENA - Exclusive Negotiating Agreements EOC - Emergency Operation Center ERA - Economic Research Associates ERAF - Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund FPPC - Fair Political Practices FOG - Fats, Oils and Grease FTA - Federal Transit Administration FTE - Full-Time Equivalent FY - Fiscal Year GAAP - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles -294- GASB - Governmental Accounting Standards Board GFOA - Government Finance Officers of America GIS - Geographic Information System GMOC - Growth Management Oversight Committee HAZCOM - Hazardous Communications HOA - Home Owners Association HR - Human Resources HUD - Housing and Urban Development HVAC - Heating\VentilationlAir Conditioning IFAS - Integrated Fund Accounting System IIPP - Injury Illness Prevention Program IMA - Infrastructure Modules Applications ITS - Information Technology Services JPA - Joint Powers Authority LAD - Landscape Architecture Division LAN - Local Area Network LEAP (Community Development) - Local Employer Assistance Program LEAP (Library) - Library Educational Afterschool Program MBPS - Mega Bytes Per Second MGD - Million Gallons per Day MHZ - Megahertz MIS - Management and Information Systems\Services MOU - Memorandum of Understanding MSCP - Multiple Species Conservation Plan MTDB - Metropolitan Transit Development Board MTS - Metropolitan Transit System NCCP - Natural Comrnunity Conservation Plan -295- - NPDES - National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ODT - Organizational Development and Training PSB - Public Services Building PBID - Property-based Business Improvement District PDM - Project Design and Management PFDIF - Public Facilities Development Impact Fees PLF - Public Library Foundation Act POP - Projected Oriented Policing RCS - Regional Communications System RCT - Residential Construction Tax RDA - Redevelopment Agency RFP - Request for Proposals RFQ - Request for Qualifications RVT - Registered Veterinarian Technician SANDAG - San Diego Association of Governments SANDPIPA - San Diego Pooled Insurance Policy Association SBEZ - South Bay Enterprise Zone SCADA - Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition SPA - Specific Planning Area SRA - Community Development Block Grant SRO - School Resource Officer SSMP - Sewer System Management Plan STRETCH - Safe Time For Recreation, Enrichment And Tutoring TDA - Transportation Development Act TDIF - Transportation Development Impact Fee UCSP - Urban Core Specific Plan USFWS - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service -296- GLOSSARY Accrual Basis of Accounting - The accounting basis used by the City by which transactions are recognized when they occur, regardless of the timing of cash receipts and disbursements. Accounting System - The collective set of records and procedures used to record, classify, and report information on the financial status and operations of the City. Accounts Payable -. Amounts owed by the City to external entities for goods and services received. Accounts Receivable - Amounts due to the City from external entities for goods and services furnished. Adopted Budget - The title of the budget following its formal adoption by resolution of the City Council. Ad Valorem - In proportion to value, a basis for levy of taxes on property. Amended Budget - The title of the budget version that includes all amendments to the Adopted Budget approved by Council throughout the fiscal year. Appropriation - A legislative act by the City Council authorizing the expenditure of a designated' amount of public funds for a specific purpose. -297- Audit - An examination of City records and accounts by an external source to check their validity and accuracy. Balanced Budget - The amount of budgeted expenditures is equal to or less than the amount of budgeted revenues plus other available sources. Bond - A certificate of debt issued by a government or corporation guaranteeing payment of the original investment plus interest by a specified future date. Budget - A spending plan and policy guide comprised of an itemized summary of the City's probable expenditures and revenues for a given fiscal year. Calendar Year (CY) - The 12-month period from January through December. Capital Expenditures - Expenditures related to the acquisition, replacement, or improvement of a section of Chula Vista's infrastructure. Capital Improvement Program - The long-range construction plan designed to foresee and address the City's future need of physical improvements or additions of a fixed or permanent nature (e.g. a new fire station, replacement of a street signal) Capital Project - Any major construction, acquisition, or renovation that increases the useful life of the City's physical assets or adds to their value. Capital Project Funds - Funds that are utilized to account for resources used for the acquisition and construction of capital facilities by the City, with the exception of those assets financed by proprietary funds. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds - Funds received from the federal government and expenditures as prescribed under the Community Development Grant Program. Debt Service Funds- Funds used for payment of interest and principal to holders of the City's various debt instruments. -298- Deferred Maintenance - A backlog of needed .repairs to City facilities including facility maintenance, painting and structural repairs. Depreciation - The expense incurred with the expiration of a capital asset. Direct Costs - Operational expenditures exclusive to a specific service or program. Discretionary Revenue - Revenues that are generated by general or specific taxing authority such as Property or Sales Taxes. Encumbrance - The designation or reserving of funds to buy an item or service. Enterprise Funds - Funds established to account for specific services funded directly by fees and charges to users such as sewer services. These funds are intended to be self-supporting. Expenditure - The actual outlay of monies set aside by appropriation for identified goods and services. Fiscal Year (FY) - The twelve-month period beginning July 1st and ending June 30th of the subsequent calendar year. Fixed Assets - An asset with a useful life greater than three years. Fringe Benefits - This consists of the costs to provide employee benefits that include the flexible benefit program, insurance, and retirement. Full-time Equivalent Positions (FTE) - The conversion of part-time, temporary, or volunteer positions to a decimal equivalent of a full-time position based on an annual amount of 2,080 hours worked. Fund - A set of interrelated accounts to record revenu'es and expenditures. Fund Balance - The excess of an entity's assets over its liabilities. A negative fund balance is sometimes referred to as a deficit. -299- Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - A uniform set of minimum standards for external financial accounting and reporting. Gann Appropriation limit - A State of California mandated appropriation limit imposed on local jurisdictions. General Fund - The City's main operating fund that is used to pay for City services. General Plan - The fundamental policy document that guides the City's future growth and development. General Revenue - See Discretionary Revenues. Grants - A contribution by a government or other organization to provide funding for a specific project. Grants can either be classified as capital projects or programmatic, depending on the grant. Indirect Cost - Costs that are essential to the operation of the City but not exclusive to any specific service or program. Indirect costs are primarily associated with support departments such as City Clerk, City Attorney, Administration, Management Information Systems (MIS), Human Resources, and Finance. Infrastructure - Basic physical assets such as buildings, streets, sewers, and parks. Interest Expense - Interest costs paid by Chula Vista on loans and bonds. Internal Service Funds- Funds that are used to finance and account for goods, special activities, and services performed by one City department for other City departments on a cost reimbursement basis. levy - To impose of collect a tax, special assessments; or charges for the suppo"rt of City services Liability - Debt or other legal obligations arising out of past transactions that will be liquidated, renewed, or refunded at some future date. -300- Memorandum of Understanding - A document detailing the outcomes of labor negotiations between the City and its various bargaining units. Municipal Code - A collection of ordinances approved by City Council. Operating Budget - Costs associated with the on-going municipal services. Ordinance - A formal legislative enactment by the City Council. Other Expenditures- All budgeted expenditures that do not fall into one of the three primary expenditure categories: Personnel, Supplies and Services, and Capital. Personnel Services Expenditures - Expenses related to employee compensation including salaries, wages, and benefits. Program Revenue - Revenues generated by a given activity. Proposed Budget - The title of the budget prior to its formal adoption by resolution of the City Council. Reserves - The portion of the General Fund balance set aside for contingencies Resolution - A special order of the City Council that requires less legal formality than an Ordinance. Revenue - Funds received from various sources to finance expenditures. Sewer Funds- Funds that account for revenues and expenditures related to the City's sewer programs, including maintenance and expansion of the City's conveyance system and payment of Metro Sewer treatment costs. Special Revenue Funds - Funds that are used to account for proceeds derived from specific revenues sources, which are legally restricted to expenditures for special purposes. (e.g. Transportation Funds, parking Funds, Public Safety Funds) -301- Spending Plan - A preliminary budget approved by Council contingent upon subsequent adoption of appropriations. Supplies and Services Expenditures - Expenditures for supplies required for the daily operation of the City and for contractual and professional services. Transient OccupanclI Tax (TOT) - A tax that is charged on occupants of hotel and motel rooms in the City. Yield - The rate of return earned on an investment based on the price paid. -302- CHULA VISTA AT A GLANCE GENERAL INFORMATION Incorporated ... ................. ............. .. .1911 Government.. ". ..... Council/Manager Bond Rating............ .......................... .. .A- POPULATION BY ETHNIC GROUP Asian I Other 17% Black 4% Hispanic 51% EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT 1 Graduate or professional degree 7% 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 12% Associate Deg ree 8% igh School, graduate 22% 1 Educational Attainment is based on population 25 years and over 275 250 III 225 'C ~ 200 ~ ~ 175 o ~ 150 125 100 -303- POPULATtON Population Median Age .............................. 233,108 ............................... 33.2 CHULA VISTA POPULATION GROWTH 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09' 10' 11' 12' 13' Note: The 1999 - 2008 population fi9ures are for January 1 ,t of the fiscal year The 2009 to 2013 population estimate assumes a growth rate of approximately 1.9%. Source: California Department of Finance ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Chula Vista Elementary School District www.cvesd.org (619) 425-9600 Number of Schools ........... .. .......... .... ...44 Projected Enrollment .........................27,400 Average Class Size Kindergarten - 3rd grade .....................20 Grades 4 - 6 ...................... .......... .29 SECONDARY SCHOOLS Sweetwater Union High School District www.suhsd.k12.ca.us (619) 691-5500 Number of Schools: .......... .............. 32 Projected Enrollment. ................ .42,083 Average Class Size ..................... ... ........26 ."-",.. HOUSING Housing Units............................. .....77,452 Persons Per Household...... .. ...... ...... 3.06 Vacancy Rate ................ . ...... ........ 3.00% HOUSEHOLD INCOME Median Income ...................... ... ....$72,236 2% 10% 14% 14% D< $15,000 $30,000 - $44,999 '" $60,000 - $74,999 I!I $100,000 - $199,999 iii $15,000 - $29,999 D $45,000 - $59,999 D $75,000 - $99,999 >= $200,000 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS HOUSING TYPE Single Family. . ........................... ...40,847 Multiple Family........... .............32,879 Mobile Homes.................................... 3,726 PUBLIC SAFETY Fire Uniform Strength ...........................118 Fire Stations... ..... .. . . . .... .. ..... .... ... ....9 Priority Fire Calls For Service2. . 12,231 Police Uniform Strength........................ 244 Priority Police Calls for Service2 ......75,026 COMMUNITY FACILITIES Acres of Developed Parks ....... .. .... . .. 520 Total Number of Parks........... .. .. . ...... .62 Ubrnri9..........................................3 Recreation Facilities... . ....... ................. 11 Sources: San Diego Association of Governments; California Department of Finance; City of Chula Vista staff 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Ii!ISingle Family -304- 2004 2005 2006 !i Multi-Family 2007 2008 2009 2 Call for service data is for fiscal year 2008 <, " ~ Ctmi'; 'il.r .l:,;~ " ::!ilt31 . ~l1{" $(:~tB e'" C' ,, , ',,' : Cou~t" .. '.. S. yof.' . anD" .'. ". :. lego>. j ... ~. ,~- \ , , '. ,'1 ' :\ .\ I ",\.' <,: .County . f .. 0 ~anDiego ,,',:' 'I, ,.,' , .,. "3'''--'''' ,.:, "'- " . . Noi to Scale C) NORTH LIGabeFI I es\Grilphl~~ &. T f'mplatcsWlclnlty mapil10411f)7 -~ COt . I Y of Chula V" V Ista ICINITY MAP -305- ',1;' "j!l.m< ".':" lp-i: ,,:, 'd, P:' 1, 1'.' 1111[:, ,':l,~ I:' 1,':":)',11,]'1,;;; ,;,;'", ,'!;1~:;:::;~ j)1;T:.; ::i ;:~!":I' ~ ,):' :1: ", ':i'; """,.1'1 " !'W;.,),:',," ': '.':JY:l~';'" ""'", !:'.::~:; ,: :,:,;, :'\r,i1: I; ~ "~/: ;"'!: l'i_:' I"" , ::1.." ;!g!; ~ :r ~\ t~,.: ;,. " .:4,:", :"). I:~~ " ,,;,1 ,'". ll~tt ,,,\ 1,," '"""I ",'1--' ---m'P""<"_-....,--.~." h..~;;,l;;;,),": '.,<.. '1.'."', )'>,_ ., ~.:1' ":,,,,;',:~, "I,~"l:<,~j::, ;, <. " ~ I~'" \" ",,",'.: >~'!'.',r . Co"; '~'<', , ' ~~ J,"i',',;l.:, ~,.',' i',,' , ~' ".'I;/..:~!.; ::~' '. _, ',I ;~,I.'~, 'if!))',' <~'>ji::' <1, 'j ~-!.' , . ~, .' " ::'[11 ~~~ ~-- ,', ;:ai:.wl --.....~~ ~ ----- On' OF CHULA VISTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROPOSED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 CHERYL COX MAYOR JOHN MCCANN STEVE CASTANEDA RUDY RAMIREZ PAMELA BENSOUSSAN COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER JIM SANDOVAL CITY MANAGER DONNA NORRIS CITY CLERK BART MIESFELD CITY ATTORNEY ~~ft-. ~~ ' ,~. ..,..', '. ,: ",,-,#' , -- -- - - ~'~~~ ~..................""- CllY OF CHULA VISTA ADMINISTRATION Jim Sandoval City Manager Scott Tulloch Assistant City Manager Leah Browder Deputy City Manager/Library Director Gary Halbert Deputy City Manager/Director of Development Services DIRECTORS Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance/Treasurer Michael Meacham Director of Conservation and Environmental Services Richard Hopkins Director of Public. Works / City Engineer Dave Hanneman Fire Chief Louie Vigna piano Director of Information Technology Services Kelly Bacon Director of Human Resources Richard Emerson Chief of Police Buck Martin Director of Recreation / Nature Center TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................... ....... ...............................................1 PROGRAM OVERViEW.................................................... ................................. ... .........2 REVENUE SUMMARy................................. ............. ............................... ..... .................4 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY. ......... ................ ............... ............ ......... .....8 "CIP PROJECT GEOGRAPHICAL BALANCE. ................. . .. ............... .................. ..............12 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................... ................ ..................................................... .........14 REPORTS AND TABLES ..... ........... .................. ......... . ...... ........... ............15 PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORTS. .... ..................... ....... ................ ... .........16 GLOSSARY OF FINANCE AND BUDGET TERMS... ........ ... ............... ... 101 INDEX... ... ................... ..... . ........... .................. ......................... .........104 INTRODUCTION As a result of the nationwide economic downturn, and reduced revenues coming into the City, City staff has conducted a comprehensive review of its Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and . project schedules. In an effort to stimulate the economy and take advantage of good market prices an aggressive project schedule is proposed for the coming fiscal year. As a result new grant funds including the ARRA (American .Recover and Reinvestment Act) funding and available funds from the prior year CIP appropriations have been reprogrammed and the proposed FY 2009-10 CIP totals $30.7 million, an increase of about 37% over last year's 2008- 09 CIP. The proposed CIP budget is the result of three major accomplishments by the Department of Public Works: . Completion of Phase I, the redesigning and web_based automation of the City of Chula Vista's Capital Improvement Program and its management. In December 2008, the City Council awarded a contract to CIPPlanner and implemented CIPAce for automation of the CIP. CIPAce is a web-based enterprise class software application that enables agencies to manage their entire capital program by a single database. The project included configuration analysis, data migration, user training and integration of the City's financial system, project and resource management. The integrated approach and five year programming enhances the City's ability to effectively manage the Capital Improvement Program portfolio over the course of its Iifecycle. This system enables staff to assess, evaluate, prioritize and manage Capital projects on a daily basis in an effort to determine the most optimal use of funds and human resources as well as track project status and related efficiency measures. Phase II (Fiscal Integration) and Phase III (Resource and Project Management) are anticipated to be complete in FY 2009-10. . Preparation of a forecasted five-year capital program. The proposed 2010-14 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget will serve as a multi-year planning instrument to identify needs and financing sources for public infrastructure improvements. The goal is two-fold: 1) identify and plan for infrastructure improvements and 2) inform city residents how the City plans to address significant capital needs over the next five years. Please note that although capital projects are scheduled throughout the five-year plan, only those programs scheduled during the first year are funded and adopted as part of the Annual Budget. Programs slated for design and construction in subsequent years may be adjusted to reflect priority changes or funding restraints. . Award of $6.2 million in new grant funding (includes ARRA funding of $3.86 million) for Capital Improvement Projects, thus reducing the reliance in the General Fund. The following is a summary of those projects: o Industrial Blvd - Bike Lane & Pedestrian Improvements ($284K) o Pavement Rehabilitation - Federal Aid Highways ($2.61 million) o Traffic Signal Modification 4th & Main, Beyer ($450K) o Traffic Signal Modification 3rd & Montgomery ($300K) o Third Avenue Streets cape Implementation Project ($2 million) o Bicycle Amenities for commuters (prior year appropriation) o Light Rail Trolley Corridor Study in Chula Vista (mid year) o I-80S South TLSP Grant (via SANDAG) o Environmental Mitigation Program ($373K) o Public Library Federal Grant ($9SK) o Community Development Block Grant - R ($SOOK) Despite staff's success in developing the proposed CIP budget, significant challenges continue to face the City due to deteriorating infrastructure that has exceeded service life and due to limited availability of resources. The most recent example is the failure of five storm drains in the City. In February and March 2009, three corrugated metal pipe (CMP) storm drain failures were discovered at three locations in close proximity to residential structures in the City of Chula Vista. These failures occurred at (1) 882 Helix Avenue, (2) 106 EI Capitan Drive, and (3) 1188 Neptune Drive. Each of these CMP failures, if not repaired, poses an imminent threat to public safety and private property. In addition, staff was made aware of a (7-ft by 7-ft by 10-ft deep) sinkhole on Thursday, February 19, 2009 that had developed at (4) 1S26 Grand Teton Court due to the displacement of concrete storm drain pipe segments. A more recent failure occurred at (S) Poggi Channel, north and south of Rancho Road (36" low-flow pipe). All of these emergency repairs must be undertaken to protect life and property and are proposed for funding using TransNet funds. A new project is being proposed in FY10 to address these failures. The final proposed appropriations to be incorporated in the FY 2009-10 budget are anticipated to go to City Council for adoption in June 2009. CIP Document The CIP document's is an integral part of the City's overall budget program. As with past budgets, this document is similar in its format. In an effort to make the document user-friendly, it has been partitioned into three categories. The first section provides a summary of the general nature of the program, revenue and expenditure summary and analysis of the geographical distribution of the projects included in the program. The second section contains a variety of tables that depict the program from a number of perspectives, including sorting projects by type, location and funding source. This section also contains some historical information and the five-year funding projections for each project contained in the program. The last section, which makes up the bulk of the document, contains descriptions of all projects that are being funded as part of the FY 2009-10 budget. These descriptions include the Location, Responsible Department, Intent, Justification and Funding Allocation. The Glossary provides definitions and the Index includes a comprehensive list of the projects contained in the budget, including the project name, page it can be found on, project number and accounting project number. . PROGRAM OVERVIEW To follow is the fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The program outlined herein was developed with two main goals in mind. The first is to build upon the City's growing recognition. of the need for additional commitment and funding for infrastructure preservation efforts. The second goal is to recognize the changing fiscal position of the City and downturn in development-related capital revenues. While there are still several development-related capital 2 projects in the program, the overall CIP seeks to balance both the types of projects and the geographical locations where projects would occur to best meet the needs of the City and its residents, businesses and visitors. I Significant funding is dedicated to on-going infrastructure rehabilitation projects. These include streets, sidewalks and sewers. In particular, street-related rehabilitation projects are predominant in this program. These projects occur on a citywide basis and are part of a comprehensive process that the City performs every year to assess the most cost efficient manner to preserve and rehabilitate the City's infrastructure. The City utilizes a comprehensive pavement management system, which forms the basis for the development of current and future pavement rehabilitation projects. With regard to the street rehabilitation effort, the City continues to focus significant attention and resources on street improvements in western Chula Vista. A number of projects have been undertaken in the past several years, including over $10 million of street rehabilitation projects, as well as significant sidewalk improvements. That effort will continue and will also include the formation of assessment districts on a number of streets in the Castle Park neighborhood. During fiscal year 2007-08, the City successfully completed the process for obtaining a $9.5 million loan from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for street improvements in the Castle Park neighborhood. Those loan proceeds became available to the City in June of 2008 and will be paid back from the City's annual allotment of CDBG funds. Construction of First Avenue, between Naples Street and Palomar Street, is complete and a number of street improvement projects are moving forward, including work on Glenhaven Way (west of First Avenue), Oxford Street (Third Avenue to Alpine Avenue) and Second Avenue (Naples Street to Palomar Street) Once these projects on the main streets in the neighborhood are completed, remaining funds will be utilized on local streets within the Castle Park neighborhood. The City continues to focus on its Annual Sewer Rehabilitation Program, which expends approximately $1 to $2 million annually for the replacement and rehabilitation of sewer pipes and manholes. The City also utilizes standardized evaluation and ranking criteria in televising and evaluating the condition of sewers in order to assure that the most critically impacted sewer infrastructure is replaced or rehabilitated first. As previously mentioned, over the last several years the City has evaluated the condition of its Storm Drain facilities, which includes approximately 88,000 lineal feet of corrugated metal pipe (CMP) storm drain within the City limits CMP storm drains have not been allowed for permanent use in the City of Chula Vista for over 20 years due to more rapid deterioration than other types of pipes, such as plastic and reinforced concrete pipes. The deteriorating CMP storm drains were categorized as Priorities 1 thru 4, as follows. Priorit 1 2 3 4 5 Lineal Feet of CMP 2,282 ft 21,858ft 9,698 ft 2,437 ft 6,785 ft Much of the CMP identified as Priority 1 has been rehabilitated However, due to limited funding, priorities 2,3 and 4 are being addressed on an as-needed basis, either after failure has 3 occurred or when failure is imminent. The CIP Program seeks to find dedicated funding for this critical program; however, due to eligibility limitations and availability of such funds, it has been increasingly difficult to fund CMP replacement and rehabilitation work. A total of $1.2 million in TransNet monies are being proposed to fund calendar year 2009 emergency drainage projects. While this focus on infrastructure continues, the City has also engaged in a program for the construction of several facilities. Since 2002, the City has undertaken over $63 million of new park and recreation facility construction. Construction activities have commenced on Mt. San Miguel Community Park and All Seasons Park construction is proposed in the FY 2009-10 program. Over 151 acres of new parkland and 58,000 square feet of new recreation center space will have been. added between 2002 and the end of fiscal year 2008-09. The $50 million renovation of the Civic Center Complex is complete and the buildings are fully occupied. The design of the Rancho Del Rey Library is complete and construction is planned to commence as soon as sufficient Public Facilities Development Impact Fees (PFDIF) are generated and/or library construction grant funding is secured. Given the economic conditions within the construction/development industry, as well as the competitive nature of library grants, it is not possible at this point in time to estimate a construction schedule. REVENUE SUMMARY In the fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program, there are a number of key funding sources; to follow is a brief description of the most programmed funding sources. Transportation Sales Tax Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) funds are derived from sales tax revenues levied in San Diego County that are collected by the State specifically for use on transportation related projects in San Diego County. The regional metropolitan planning agency, San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), programs these funds to municipalities within San Diego County. Revenues vary from year to year, depending on the amount of sales tax available to the region and the number and costs of projects for which municipalities, local transit, and Caltrans request funding The revenue approved for municipalities is based on the specific cost estimates that are required to be submitted as part of the annual request for funding. In fiscal year 2009-10, Transportation Sales Tax proposed budgets are $8.35 million, with an additional $3.36 million of TransNet ARRA funds (TransNet funds re-allocated from Caltrans projects that received Federal ARRA funding for construction). Of that amount, approximately $7 7 million is programmed for pavement rehabilitation. A number of smaller traffic congestion improvement projects and transportation planning efforts are also funded from TransNet. The City continues to ensure that a minimum of 70% of its TransNet funds are allocated to congestion relief efforts. This limits the City's use of these funds for minor pavement rehabilitation efforts to a maximum 30% of the City's annual allocation. The City intends to explore the possibility of dedicating additional amounts to minor pavement efforts (projects with less than a one-inch thick overlay) with SANDAG in the future. Sewer Facility Replacement Fund The Sewer Facility Replacement Fund is a fee based revenue source that all properties pay each month as part of their sewer bills. The funds can be utilized to replace, rehabilitate or 4 upgrade existing sewer facilities. In fiscal year 2009-10, a total of $0.7 million is proposed to be funded. Among the projects receiving funding are the annual rehabilitation program ($0.3 million) and Robinhood Ranch II Pump Station Improvements ($0.4 million). In addition, approximately $5.8 million.of existing funding and projects will carry over. Traffic Signal Fee The Traffic Signal Fee is a trip based development impact fee that is charged with the issuance of building permits for new construction. The fee can be utilized for the installation and upgrade of traffic signals throughout the City. In fiscal year 2009-10, it is proposed that $1.067 million be funded. Traffic Signal Fees are down, as are all development related revenues, and the projects list for the fund has been re-prioritized. However, the City has received notification of American Recovery Reinvestment Act funds for eligible Traffic projects, which allowed for approximately $0.75 million of Traffic Signal funds to be reallocated to other projects. Proposition 1 B Highway Funds In 2006-07, the voters of the state approved Proposition 1 B. This proposition included funds to be provided to cities within the state for local roadway improvements. The City will receive a .total of approximately $7 million, $3.6 million in fiscal year 2008-09 and the remaining portion in fiscal year 2009-10. Prop 42 (Traffic Congestion Relief Fund) Several years ago, the voters approved Proposition 42, which provided funding for cities to improve streets. The funds can only be utilized for street improvements and the City has utilized these funds to augment its annual pavement rehabilitation efforts. In fiscal year 2008- 09, the amount budgeted from this fund for this purpose is $1 million. In FY2009-10, the proposed amount to be budgeted is $348,000. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds Each year, the City receives approximately $1.9 million in CDBG funds Of this amount, approximately $1.1 million is available for capital improvement projects. The City of Chula Vista received Section 108 loan funds in June of 2008 for the Castle Park street improvement projects; the debt service on that loan will be paid back from the City's annual allotment of CDBG funds. This will reduce the amount of CDBG funds available for other capital projects to approximately $.5 million annually for the next ten years. All of these funds are programmed for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Curb Ramp construction The City's ADA Annual Curb Ramp Program improves pedestrian accessibility and walkability for all citizens, in compliance with ADA requirements and standards. Ramps are constructed in priority order, from a Transition Plan of approximately 1200 ramps approved by the City Council, and based primarily on proximity to public and transit services, public facilities, schools, and commercial facilities. Upon completion of the ramps identified in the Transition Plan, retrofits of existing, older ramps will be required to provide greater levels of accessibility. 5 Miscellaneous Grants The City has applied for and been approved for various grants to fund Capital Improvement Projects. These grants include Smart Growth. Incentive, TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program and Public Library Federal Grants. Cumulatively, the amounts budgeted for FY 2009- 10 is approximately $2.8 million (not including ARRA exchange funds). In addition, the City continues to pursue American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funds. The City was recently approved for $3.36 million in ARRA funds via an exchange in TransNet funds through SANDAG and $.5 million in CDBG-R (ARRA) funds. These funds are programmed in the FY 2009-10 program for Pavement, Traffic Signal related projects and Third Avenue Streetscape. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funds President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act into law, which provides "economic stimulus" funds in the amount of $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) nationwide. A large portion of the ARRA funds are intended to benefit individuals such as through tax relief, Medicaid, and mortgage assistance. Another portion is intended to assist public agencies in providing services and improving infrastructure to keep people employed as well as to create new jobs. City staff has been working diligently since before adoption of ARRA to identify opportunities that would benefit Chula Vista and be ready for aggressive timelines and application periods. In anticipation of the bill, the U.S. Conference of Mayors asked cities to come up with ready-to-go projects that would create jobs and invest in infrastructure. Along with other San Diego county cities through SANDAG, Chula Vista identified a number of projects already identified as "shovel ready" that can start immediately. Most cities focused on proposals for roads, sewer and other infrastructure projects. In all, Chula Vista's wish list added up to about $540 million. The thought was to identify as many projects as possible in the instance that funds would become available. The City already knows of many projects that would benefit the community, if funding were available. Many of the ARRA funds come with very specific eligibility criteria and regulatory guidelines. If the City has some projects already identified that would meet that criteria, then that could free up less restrictive money for other community projects. For example, Federal highway funds generally may only be used on designated arterial roadways. There are a number of infrastructure projects already identified in the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan and the Western Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Any federal highway funds received by the City would be used ondesignated arterial roadways even if they are lower on the priority list, thereby making more local funds, such as TransNet, available for use on local streets. Transparency is an important component of ARRA. The Federal government has created a website to convey results and performance measurements to the public. Similarly, it will be important to keep our local residents apprised ofthe City's actions and results with ARRA funds. City staff has created a scorecard to track potential applications for ARRA funds, funds received, and performance with funds received. The scorecard and any related ARRA information will be maintained on the City's website. 6 The following chart summarizes the funding sources for the Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 2009-10. FY10 Proposed CIP Program by Funding Source Transportation Grants 15.07% Park Acquisition and Development (PAD) 6.51% Traffic Signal /_~ 347% 1,\----__________ Miscellaneous / \ 0.39% /1 "-- Library Grants Sewer Funds -' CDBG (&. CDBG- 0.64% 5.63% R) 3.59% / TransNet /~ 38.10% Redevelopment Funds 3.33% Development // Impact Funds -// (DIF) 13.32% Miscell~neo.us Grants 9.94% 7 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY The capital budget complements the operating budget by providing funding for major capital projects. The fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) plan includes $30 million in funding. It should be noted that of that amount, approximately $4.5 million are reallocation of existing funds from prior years. In addition, there is approximately $10 million of existing appropriations that will carry over into FY10. The majority of the funding recommended with the adoption of the budget pertains to the rehabilitation/improvement of existing facilities. The chart below provides a breakdown, by project type, of the total $30.7 million of appropriations proposed with this budget. FY10 Proposed Funding by Project Type Traffic 10%\ Sewer 5% \ Park and Recreation 7% Drainage 8% Gen GovtlOther ~ ProjectsfRDA / I Library 4% / 1% / Major Streets __/ 26% Local Streets 39% Facilities The total cost of building and park facilities over the last 15 years has exceed $100 million, which includes the completion of the renovations to the Civic Center Complex, various recreational facilities, new and renovated parks, new and renovated fire stations and other projects. The funding sources for these projects included development impact fees (DIF), residential construction tax (RCT), redevelopment funds (RDA), grants and the General Fund. With respect to the Civic Center, the project has been completed and fully occupied as of November 2008. The final component to the Civic Center project will be the construction of a new Fire Station No.1. The Master Plan for the Fire Facility network has been completed. Libraries The City received $95,000 in Public Library Federal Funding proposed to fund the Civic Center Library Veterans Wing. Another major project is the construction of the Rancho del Rey Library, which will be one of four branch libraries serving the four corners of the City. The 31,129 square-foot facility will be a fullcservice library, with a capacity of up to 130,000 books, audio- visual materials and newspapers and magazines. Besides some 28,000 items in Spanish, there will also be unique cultural heritage collections focusing on Filipino, Pan-Asian and Hispanic cultures in ref/ection of the community's diversity. The estim.ated cost of the project is $19.1 million. The design of the library has been completed. Due to the slowdown in development activities, the fund balance of the PFDIF (which is responsible for 100% of the costs of the 8 project) is not sufficient to move forward to construction. It is unknown when sufficient PFDIF revenues will be available to commence construction. Parks Numerous major neighborhood parks, including Cotton'wood Park, Heritage Park, Breezewood Park, Harvest Park and Santa Venetia Park in Otay Ranch and Sunset View Park in Eastlake Greens were completed. In fiscal year 2005-06, Harborside Park, the first new park in western Chula Vista in over 25 years and Mountain Hawk Park in Eastlake Vistas were completed. In addition to these neighborhood parks, three large community parks were also opened to the public. These parks were Veterans Park, Salt Creek Park and Montevalle Park. All three of these facilities included recreation centers. Several other neighborhood parks were completed in fiscal year 2006-07 including, Horizon Park and Winding Walk Park in Otay Ranch. The renovations of Otay Park ($1.9 million) were completed in the spring of 2008. Also, the design of Mt. San Miguel Park, a community park ~"""-"--",,,,,,,,,,""'" in San Miguel Ranch ($7,0 million), has been completed. Funding for Mt. San Miguel Ranch Community Park was appropriated mid-year in FY2008-09 with construction currently underway. The new neighborhood park in Village 7 of Otay Ranch, named All Seasons Park, ($2.9 million) has seen its master plan approve'd and design is nearing completion" It is proposed that $2 million be appropriated in FY2009-10 as necessary to begin construction. Fire Facilities Included in the proposed 5 year CIP forecast is construction of the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) Fire Station. The City is currently negotiating a development agreement to offset the construction costs and operating costs for the EUC fire station. Fire stations one and five are in need of replacement. Built in 1954, fire station five was part of the Montgomery Fire District. This station is 55 years old and in a state of deterioration. This fire station is far past its useful life needing constant repair due to structural damage that has been brought on by age Station 5 is currently in need of a new roof and other major repairs, Fire Station 1 was built in 1948 and is 61 years old. This station also has structural damage due to its age and is in need of a roof. The Fire Department will apply for Economic Stimulus funding (ARRA) to address the replacement of both of these stations as both of these stations meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the grant guidelines. Station 5 is recommended to be relocated to a larger site adjacent to the South Library. The relocation of Station 5 to a larger site will allow the expansion of future service delivery to respond to growth needs. The Fire Facility Master Plan document is being updated to achieve fire and emergency medical service delivery within national public safety standards. The plan will be presented to Council in an upcoming workshop this fall Lastly, discussions are underway regarding Bayfront Capital Improvement Projects as follows: . Bayfront Sewer Lift Station - $12.4* million FY10/11 . Bayfront Fire Station North East corner of Bay Blvd and "J" Street - $12 million FY10/11 . Bayfront Park Improvements - $6.68* million FY11/12 *includes estimated design, project management and contingency , 9 It is anticipated that these projects will be programmed beginning FY 2010-11 and in future years. Infrastructure Projects The infrastructure portion of the CI P budget contains significant funding for a variety of infrastructure' improvements. As discussed above and elsewhere within the City's budget, a substantial amount of the funding is focused on infrastructure improvements in the western portion of the City and preservation of infrastructure citywide. Over the past few years, City staff has presented a number of reports to the City Council with regard to the condition and capacity of existing infrastructure (i.e., pavement, corrugated metal pipe, storm drains, sewers, roadways, etc.) citywide, as well as the lack of sidewalks and other public improvements primarily within the western portion of the City, especially within the Montgomery Annexation area. Adequate funding is currently not available to build new infrastructure and maintain existing infrastructure. Therefore, the CI P strives to balance the need and desire to provide enhanced public facilities, while assuring that existing infrastructure is maintained and preserved in at least a minimally acceptable condition over the long-term. With the adoption of the fiscal year 2004-05 budget, the City Council approved a finan'cing plan for infrastructure improvements in western Chula Vista. This financing plan revolved around a two-pronged financing program. One element of the program was a $9 million bond issue that would be repaid from the City's Residential Construction Tax (RCT) revenues over a period of 30 years. That financing was completed in late summer of 2004. This portion of the financing was earmarked for drainage and park improvements. With the receipt of those funds, work has been completed on a number of drainage projects in western Chula Vista. A total of $4.7 million of the financing was dedicated to drainage improvements. The balance of these funds was utilized to construct Harborside Park ($2.1 million), Otay Park renovations ($1.9 million) and improvements to Lauderbach Park ($.6 million). The second portion of the financing is a $9.5 million loan through the US Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Section 108 loan program. The loan will be repaid through the City's annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement from HUD and will be paid back over a period of 20 years. The Section 108 loan is earmarked for street improvements in the Castle Park area. The City formally submitted its application for the loan in May of 2006 and the loan was approved in fiscal year 2006-07. The loan funds became available to the City in June of 2008. With the approval of the loan, work has commenced on the projects. The City Council directed that the main streets in the neighborhood proceed first. First Avenue is complete, with Oxford Street, and Second Avenue moving forward. Also moving forward is Glenhaven Way. This street is not a main street in the neighborhood; however, it intersects with First Avenue, has sufficient signatures on the assessment district formation petition and offers some economies of scale. 10 Other major efforts are the City's annual pavement management program that will be funded at a level of $7.7 million. This effort is augmented by funds previously appropriated (approximately $10 million are being carried over into the new fiscal year and contracts continue to be issued). In the coming years the city will be seeking other revenue sources to try to maintain a similarly high level of reinvestment in our pavement citywide. In addition, the City was fortunate to receive TransNet ARRA exchange funds totaling $3.36 million. Those funds will be utilized on Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways ($2.61 million) and Traffic Signal Modification Projects ($0.75 million). These funds are being received as TransNet funds, thus providing an additional $3.36 million of programmable funding. Also included in the budget is funding for new ADA accessible curb ramps ($504,922), Traffic Signal Modification and Installations ($1.965 million), and Sewer rehabilitation, Improvements, feasibility study and capacity enhancements ($1.7 million). The budget also includes funding for continued traffic count, monitoring, neighborhood and pedestrian safety, signing and striping, congestion relief programs ($1.185 million). The city was the recipient of Smart Growth Incentive and Environmental Mitigation Program funding. The Smart Growth Incentive is proposed to fund Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements ($2 million), Palomar Gateway Specific Plan ($400,000) and Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements ($283,900). The Environmental Mitigation Program funding is proposed to fund the Cactus Wren Habitation Restoration - Central City Preserve Area ($373,048). Other Several other projeels are being proposed for redevelopment and upgrade/maintenance of information technologies specific to capital improvement projects. The projects proposed include the Downtown Parking District Improvements ($120,000), Storefront Renovation ($150,000) and upgrade / maintenance of the Capital Improvement Software (CIPAce), AutoCAD, GIS OrthophotographylTopography and Survey' Monument Preservation and Replacement Program ($75,000). The replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks at the Public Works Center is also being proposed in the FY10 program. 11 CIP PROJECT GEOGRAPHICAL BALANCE . Council has indicated that one of its primary goals in the coming years is a continued focus on capital and infrastructure needs in the western portion of the City. For this discussion, the term western refers essentially to those areas of the City west of Interstate 805. As a sub-area in the western portion of the City, the projects that are specific to the Montgomery area are broken out separately. Also, a category of projects has been developed that is called Citywide. The types of projects. that are typified by Citywide include by are not limited to the annual pavement rehabilitation program, sidewalk rehabilitation program, ADA Curb ramp program and sewer facility rehabilitation program. As the eastern portion of the City continues to rapidly. develop, there is a substantial need for infrastructure improvements. Developers, as part of their development approval obligations, construct many of the improvements that occur in .the eastern portions of the City. For this reason, those projects which provide public benefit are not part of the City's CIP program. The actual amounts proposed for the geographical areas are depicted below: Location FY 2009-10 Amount Percent Urban Core $588,048 2% Citywide $12,842,973 42% Eastern $5,660,271 19% Montgomery $770,000 3% Southwest $1,367,570 5% Western City $9,514,440 30% ota1 $30,743,302 100% Western Chula Vista Breakdown Location FY 2009-10 Amount Percent Urban Core $588,048 5% Montgomery $770,000 7% Southwest $1,367,570 12% Western City $9,514,440 77% ota1 $12,240,058 100% Given the nature of the citywide projects, it is safe to say that 50% to 60% of those expenditures typically occur in western Chula Vista though this can change from year to year. Assuming that 50% holds true, then 61 % of the capital expenditures programmed for fiscal year 2009-10 are earmarked for western Chula Vista and Montgomery. It must also be noted that the eastern Chula Vista projects that the City itself undertakes are overwhelmingly funded by development impact fees or other revenues directly related to development activities (Traffic Signal 12 FundfTDIF/PAD), thus leaving significant revenue streams available to fund projects in the western portion of the City. FY10 Proposed CIP Program by Geographical Area Urban Core 2% Western City 31% 4% Montgomery 3% "l Eastern 18% 13 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The development of the fiscal year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program was a collaborative effort of staff of virtually every department in the City. Early in the process, departments were asked to assign a "departmental liaison" to coordinate their respective department's CIP projects. This collaborative effort has resulted in a well planned, organized and, most importantly, doable capital improvement program that will benefit the citizens of Chula Vista for years to come. In addition, as. approved by Council on December 9, 2008 (Resolution 2008- 276), staff implemented a web-based enterprise class software application called CIPAce to manage the entire program and individual projects from beginning to end. This entailed a comprehensive analysis of the City's existing systems, data compilation, fiscal integration and assessment of the entire capital improvement program. The following staff made this document possible: Redevelopment and Housing Eric Crockett, Mandy Mills, Angelica Davis and Diem Do Angelica Aguilar,.Evelyn Ong, Karim Galeana, Tiffany Allen, Paul Valadez, and Lisa Partee Finance Fire Pablo Quilantan, Jim Garcia Development Services I Planning & Building Mariya Anton Louie Vignapiano, Hermon Howell, Derek Hath, Darrell Boggess and Bob Blackwelder Mary Ladiana, Ed Batchelder, Garry Williams, Tom Adler and Ben Guerrero Library ITS Public Works Iracsema Quilantan, Frank Rivera, Kirk Ammerman, Merce LeClair, Jim Newton, Boushra Salem, Roberto Yano, Jose Gomez, Elizabeth Chopp, Roberto Solorzano, Rick Ryals, Florence Picardal, Matt Little, Silvester Evetovich and Bob Beamon Recreation Buck Martin Police Ed Chew I would like to especially recognize Richard Hopkins, Director of .Public Works and Iracsema Quilantan, Assistant Director of Engineering for their excellent service and guidance in the development of this budget. I would also like to thank Hermon Howell, Derek Hath and Darrell Boggess in ITS and Merce LeClair in Engineering. ITS once again was very helpful in assisting with the implementation of CIPAce and Merce spent many hours coordinating the implementation efforts for CIPAce, gathering information, compiling data and putting it into the easy-to-use format that follows. Respectfully submitted, Jim Sandoval City Manager 14 REPORTS AND TABLES The following pages contain a variety of reports and tables that depict the program from a number of perspectives, including sorting projects by type, location and funding source. In addition, from each perspective a list of "unfunded" projects is provided whereby staff continues to seek alternate funding sources whereby a mid-year appropriation may become necessary and at that time will be brought forth to Council for approval. This section also contains a five-year funding projection for each project contained in the program. 15 TABLE 1 FY 2009/10 Capital Improvement Program Funding Summary By Project Type FY2DD9-1D Proposed Drainage New DR182 - Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue $950,000 New DR183 - Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Avenue tD HilltDp Drive $300,000 New DR180 - Emergency StDrm Drain Replacement $1,200,000 Subtotal $2,450,000 General Government GG 183 - GIS-OrthDphDtDgrahy/T DpDgraphy Project $15,000 GG187 - Replacement Df Fuel StDrage Tanks $72,000 Subtotal $87,000 Library LB137 - AutDmation Advancements & Upgrade $102,644. New LB143 - Civic Center Library Veterans Wing $95,000 Subtotal $197,644 Local Streets STL291 - FDurth Avenue Sidewalk ImprDvements $235,000 STL303 - First Ave Impvmts Palomar - Naples $20,000 STL304 - Glenhaven Way Amy Street Improvments $10,000 16 New New New New New New New New New New New STL305 - Oxford Street Improvents Third to Alpine STL323 - Pedestrian Master Plan STL342 - Second Avenue Improvements-Naples Street to Palomar Street STL346 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation STL351 - Bikeway Master Plan Update STL352 - ADA Curb Ramps FY09-1 0 STL354 - Pavement Major Rehabilitation FY2009-1 0 STL355 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation FY2009-10 STL357 - Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Prop 1 B) STL359 - Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps Construction STL360 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Palomar Street STL361 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements STL362 - Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements STL363 - Sidewalk Safety Program -I Street Sidewalk Improvements Subtotal Major Streets STM354 - North Broadway Reconstruction STM355 - Otay Lakes Road Widening $15,000 $45,000 $125,000 $348,000 $200,000 $504,922 $2,020,000 $450,000 $3,385,407 $205,000 $353,370 $429,200 $3,300,000 $232,440 $11,878,339 $2,368,000 $2,500,000 17 New New New New STM364 - Heritage Road Bridge Reconstruction STM366 - Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways STM367 - South Broadway Improvements, Main Street to Southern City Limits Subtotal Other Projects OP200 - Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program OP202 - CIP Advanced Planning OP206 - Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade OP208 - CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase OP212 - Downtown Parking District Improvements OP217 - Palomar Gateway Specific Plan OP218 - Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area Subtotal Park and Recreation PR279 - All Seasons Park Subtotal Redevelopment RD241 - Storefront Renovation Program Subtotal Sewer $315,271 $2,610,000 $300,000 $8,093,271 $30,000 $92,000 $10,000 $20,000 $120,000 $475,000 $373,048 $1,120,048 ' $2,000,000 $2,000,000 , $150,000 $150,000 18 New New SW234 - Sewer Impvts on Colorado bet J & K SW256 - Robinhood Ranch /I Pump Stn Impvts SW260 - Sewer Rehab for FY09-1 0 SW261 - Industrial Blvd. and Main Street Capacity Enhancement Traffic TF274 - Traffic Count Station and Maintenance Subtotal TF316 - Traffic Signal Installation at Second Avenue and Ouintard Street TF321 - Citywide Traffic Count Program TF325 - Traffic Monitoring Program TF327 - Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program TF330 - Traffic Signal Modification, Fourth & Main, Fourth & Beyer TF331 - Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Montgomery TF332 - Signing and Striping Program TF337 - Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Program TF344 - I 805 Direct Access Ramp E Hand E Palomar TF345 - Traffic Calming Program TF350 - Traffic Signal System Optimization $777,000 $400,000 $300,000 $140,000 $1,617,000 $210,000 $175,000 $90,000 $120,000 $220,000 $450,000 $320,000 $100,000 $300,000 $30,000 $130,000 $50,000 19 New . New TF354 - Traffic Congestion Relief Program TF356 - Otay Mesa Transportation System TF359 - SR54 Corridor and Arterial Operations TF362 - Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 TF366 - Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Upgrade and Modification Program TF370 - Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue TF371 - Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive and Main Street Subtotal Total for All Projects $75,000 $30,000 $30,000 $100,000 $325,000 $145,000 $250,000 $3,150,000 $30,743,302 20 TABLE 1A FY 2009/10 Capitallmpr~vement Program Funding Summary By Project Type (UNFUNDED) FY2009-10 Proposed Drainage DR181 - CMP Rehabilitation and Replacement Program $250,000 Subtotal $250,000 General Government GG187 - Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks $200,000 GG195 - C & R Minor Capital Improvements $100,000 GG204 - Energy Retrofit Phase II $2,000,000 New GG205 - City Facilities Roofing Renovation $325,000 New GG206 - Fire Risers at City Facilities $30,000 Subtotal $2,655,000 Library LB144 - Civic Center Library Remodel $4,500,000 LB 145 - South Chula Vista Library Renovations $1,000,000 Subtotal $5,500,000 Park and Recreation PR212 - Outdoor Sports Court Renovation $72,000 21 PR299 - Greg Rogers Park Restroom Renovation $400,000 New PRNew1 - Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) $800,800 New PRNew2 - Rienstra Park Slope Reconstruction $300,000 New PRNew3 - Hilltop Park Playground Replacement $44,000 Subtotal $1,616,800 Public Safety PS145 - Fire Station 5 Programming & Replacement $12,000,000 Subtotal $12,000,000 Traffic TF338 - Replace City Street Signs (Non-Illuminated) $75,000 New TF372 - Internally Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement Program - Energy Conservation Grant $100,000 Subtotal $175,000 Total for All Projects $22,196,800 22 TABLE 2 FY 2009/10 Capital Improvement Program Summary by Geographical Area FY10 Total Proposed Urban Core OP212 - Downtown Parking District Improvements $120,000 OP218, Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area $373,048 LB143 - Civic Center Library Veterans Wing $95,000 Sub Total $588,048 Citywide GG183 - GIS-OrthophotograhylTopography Project $15,000 DR180 - Emergency Storm Drain Replacement $1,200,000 LB137 - Automation Advancements & Upgrade $102,644 OP200 - Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program $30,000 OP202 - CIP Advanced Planning $92,000 OP206 - Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade $10,000 OP208 - CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase $20,000 STL323 - Pedestrian Master Plan $45,000 STL346 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation $348,000 STL351 - Bikeway Master Plan Update $200,000 STL352 - ADA Curb Ramps FY09-10 $504,922 STL354 - Pavement Major Rehabilitation FY2009-10 $2,020,000 STL355 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation FY2009-1 0 $450,000 STL357 - Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Prop 1 B) $3,385,407 STM366 - Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways $2,610,000 23 SW260 - Sewer Rehab for FY09-10 TF321 - Citywide Traffic Count Program TF325 - Traffic Monitoring Program TF327 - Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program TF332 - Signing and Striping Program TF337 - Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Program TF345 - Traffic Calming Program TF350 - Traffic Signal System Optimization TF354 - Traffic Congestion Relief Program TF362 - Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 TF366 - Traffic Signal and Streetli9ht Systems Upgrade and Modification Program Sub Total Eastern PR279 - All Seasons Park STL359 - Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps Construction STM355 - Otay Lakes Road Widening STM364 - Heritage Road Bridge Reconstruction SW256 - Robinhood Ranch II Pump Stn Impvts TF27 4 - Traffic Count Station and Maintenance TF344 - I 805 Direct Access Ramp E Hand E Palomar Sub Total Montgomery STL303 - First Ave Impvmts Palomar - Naples STL304 - Glenhaven Way Amy Street Improvments STL305 - Oxford Street Improvents Third to Alpine TF331 - Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Montgomery $300,000 $90,000 $120,000 $220,000 $100,000 $300,000 $130,000 $50,000 $75,000 $100,000 $325,000 $12,842,973 $2,000,000 $205,000 $2,500,000 $315,271 $400,000 $210,000 $30,000 $5,660,271 $20,000 $10,000 $15,000 $320,000 24 TF356 - Otay Mesa Transportation System $30,000 STL342 - Second Avenue Improvements-Naples Street to Palomar Street $125,000 TF371 - Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive and Main Street $250,000 Sub Total $770,000 Southwest STM367 - South Broadway Improvements, Main Street to Southern City Limits $300,000 STL360 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Palomar Street $353,370 STL361 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements $429,200 SW261 - Industrial Blvd. and Main Street Capacity Enhancement $140,000 TF370 - Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue $145,000 Sub Total $1,367,570 Western City DR182 - Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue $950,000 DR183 - Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Avenue to Hilltop Drive $300,000 GG187 - Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks $72,000 OP217 - Palomar Gateway Specific Plan $475,000 RD241 - Storefront Renovation Program $150,000 STL291 - Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements $235,000 STL362 - Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements $3,300,000 STL363 - Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements $232,440 STM354 - North Broadway Reconstruction $2,368,000 SW234 - Sewer Impvts on Colorado bet J & K $777,000 TF316 _ Traffic Signal Installation at Second Avenue and Quintard Street $175,000 TF330 - Traffic Signal Modification, Fourth & Main, Fourth & Beyer $450,000 TF359 - SR54 Corridor and Arterial Operations $30,000 25 _~'r' .. ..._~, TABLE 2A FY 2009/10 Capital Improvement Program Summary by Geographical Area (UNFUNDED) FY2009-10 Proposed Central PR299 - Greg Rogers Park Restroom Renovation $400,000 Subtotal $400,000 Citywide DR181 - CMP Rehabilitation and Replacement Program $250,000 GG195 - C &R Minor Capital Improvements $100,000 GG204 - Energy Retrofit Phase II $2,000,000 GG205 - City Facilities Roofing Renovation $325,000 GG206 - Fire Risers at City Facilities $30,000 PR212 - Outdoor Sports Court Renovation $72,000 TF338 - Replace City Street Signs (Non-Illuminated) $75,000 TF372 - Internally Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement Program - Energy Conservation Grant $100,000 Subtotal $2,952,000 Montgomery PS145 - Fire Station 5 Programming & Replacement $12,000,000 Subtotal $12,000,000 Southwest PRNew1 - Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) $800,800 PRNew2 - Rienstra Park Slope Reconstruction $300,000 27 PRNew3 - Hilltop Park Playground Replacement Subtotal Western City GG187 - Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks LB144 - Civic Center Library Improvements LB145 - S Chula Vista Library Improvements Subtotal Total $44,000 $1,144,800 $200,000 $4,500,000 $1,000,000 $5,700,000 $22,196,800 28 TABLE 3 FY 2009/10 Capital Improvement Program Summary By Funding Source FY2009-10 Proposed Project Status 22500 - Traffic Signal OP206 - Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade $2,000 On Going OP208 - CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase $5,000 On Going TF316 - Traffic Signal Installation at Second Avenue and Quintard Street $175,000 On Schedule TF331 - Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Montgomery $20,000 On Schedule TF337 - Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Program $300,000 On Going TF354 - Traffic Congestion Relief Program $5,000 On Going TF366 - Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Upgrade and Modification' Program $165,000 On Schedule TF370 - Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue $145,000 New TF371 - Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive and Main Street $250,000 New Subtotal $1,067,000 22700 - TransNet DR180 - Emergency Storm Drain Replacement $1,200,000 New OP202 - CIP Advanced Planning $77,000 On Going OP208 - CIP Mgt & Equipment Purchase $5,000 On Going STL291 - Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements $235,000 On Schedule 29 STL303 - First Ave Impvmts Palomar - Naples $20,000 Almost Complete STL304 - Glenhaven Way Amy Street Improvments $10,000 On Schedule STL305 - Oxford Street Improvents Third to Alpine $15,000 On Schedule STL323 - Pedestrian Master Plan $45,000 On Schedule STL342 - Second Avenue Improvements-Naples Street to Palomar Street $25,000 New STM354 - North Broadway Reconstruction $50,000 On Schedule $2,020,000 New $450,000 New $205,000 New $35,355 New $145,300 New $116,220 New $2,368,000 On Going STL351 - Bikeway Master Plan Update STL354 - Pavement Major Rehabilitation FY2009-10 STL355 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation FY2009-10 STL359 - Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps Construction STL360 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Palomar Street STL361 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements STL363 - Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements STM367 - South Broadway Improvements, Main Street to Southern City Limits $300,000 New TF321 - Citywide Traffic Count Program $90,000 On Going TF325 - Traffic Monitoring Program $20,000 On Going TF327 - Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program $220,000 On Going 30 TF366 - Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Upgrade and Modification Program $100,000 On Going $30,000 On Going $130,000 On Going $50,000 On Going $70,000 On Going $30,000 On Going $30,000 On Going $100,000 On Going $160,000 On Going Subtotal $8,351,875 TF332 - Signing and Striping Program TF344 - I 805 Direct Access Ramp E Hand E Palomar TF345 - Traffic Calming Program TF350 - Traffic Signal System Optimization TF354 - Traffic Congestion Relief Program TF356 - Otay Mesa Transportation System TF359 - SR54 Corridor and Arterial Operations TF362 - Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 22700 - TransNet ARRA Exchange STM366 - Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Highways $2,610,000 New TF330 - Traffic Signal Modification, Fourth & Main, Fourth & Beyer $450,000 On Schedule TF331 - Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Montgomery $300,000 On Schedule Subtotal $3,360,000 73654 - Smart Growth Incentive OP217 - Palomar Gateway Specific Plan $400,000 New STL361 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements $283,900 New STL362 - Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements $2,000,000 New 31 Subtotal $2,683,900 24110 - Parking Meter OP212 - Downtown Parking District Improvements $120,000 On Going Subtotal $120,000 26110 - State Library Act LB137 - Automation Advancements & Upgrade $102,644 On Going Subtotal $102,644 27221 - Public Library Federal Grant LB143 - Civic Center Library Veterans Wing $95,000 New Subtotal $95,000 27412 - Community Development Slock Grant - R STL362 - Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements $500,000 New Subtotal $500,000 33310 - CDSG STL352 - ADA Curb Ramps FY09-10 $504,922 New Subtotal $504,922 33330 - CDSG Section 108 Loan STL342 - Second Avenue Improvements-Naples Street to Palomar $100,000 New Street Subtotal $100,000 41300 - Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve SW234 - Sewer Impvts on Colorado bet J & K $777,000 On Schedule SW261 - Industrial Blvd, and Main Street Capacity Enhancement $140,000 New 32 Subtotal $917,000 41410 - Sewer Service Revenue - 41410 Subtotal $5,000 On Going $72,000 On Going $15,000 On Going $15,000 On Going $3,000 On Going $5,000 On Going $115,000 GG183 - GIS-Orthophotograhy/Topography Project GG187 - Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks OP200 - Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program OP202 - CIP Advanced Planning OP206 - Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade OP208 - CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase 42800 - Sewer Facility Replacement SW256 - Robinhood Ranch II Pump Stn Impvts $400,000 On Schedule SW260 - Sewer Rehab for FY09-10 , $300,000 New Subtotal $700,000 54220 - Telegraph Canyon Drainage DIF DR182 - Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue $950,000 New DR 183 - Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Avenue to Hilltop Drive $300,000 New Subtotal $1,250,000 59110 - Transportation Development GG183 - GIS-Orthophotograhy/Topography Project $10,000 On Going OP200 - Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program $15,000 On Going 33 OP206 - Automation - Auto CAD Upgrade OP208 - CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase STM355 - Otay Lakes Road Widening TF27 4 - Traffic Count Station and Maintenance TF325 - Traffic Monitoring Program 61110 - Merged Bayfront Towncenter I STL362 - Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements RD241 - Storefront Renovation Program 65140 - Merged Project Area OP217 - Palomar Gateway Specific Plan RD241 - Storefront Renovation Program 71533 - Otay Ranch Village 7 Neighborhood Park PR279 - All Seasons Park 72300 - Bicycle Facilities Fund (TDA) STL351 - Bikeway Master Plan Update $5,000 On Going $5,000 On Going $2,500,000 On Schedule $210,000 On Going $100,000 On Going Subtotal $2,845,000 $800,000 New Subtotal $75,000 On Going $875,000 $75,000 $75,000 New On Going Subtotal $150,000 $2,000,000 On Going Subtotal $2,000,000 $150,000 On Going STL363 - Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements $116,220 New Subtotal $266,220 34 73610 - Miscellaneous Transportation Grants STL360 - Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Palomar Street STM364 - Heritage Road Bridge Reconstruction Subtotal 73900 - Prop 42 Traffic Congestion Relief STL346 - Pavement Minor Rehabilitation Subtotal 74100 - Prop 18 Highway Safety STL357 - Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Prop 1 B) Subtotal 73681 - Environmental Mitigation Program (Other Trans Programs) OP218 - Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area Subtotal Total for All Funds $318,015 On Schedule $315,271 On Schedule $633,286 $348,000 On Going $348,000 $3,385,407 $3,385,407 $373,048 $373,048 $30,743,302 New New 35 TABLE 3A FY2009/10 Capital Improvement Program J Funding Summary By Funding Source (UNFUNDED) 09200 - General Fund GG187 - Replacement of Fuel Tanks GG195 - C & R Minor Capital Improvements GG205 - City Facilities Roofing Renovation GG206 - Fire Risers at City Facilities PRNew1 - Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) Subtotal 22110 - Gas Tax TF338 - Replace City Street Signs (Non-Illuminated) Subtotal 26800 - State Recreation Grant PRNew3 - Hilltop Park Playground Replacement Subtotal 28568 - CEC Energy Loan Phase I TF372 - Internally Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement Program - Energy Conservation Grant Subtotal 30110 - Storm Drain Revenue DR 181 - CMP Rehabilitation and Replacement Program Subtotal FY2009-10 Proposed $200,000 $100,000 $325,000 $30,000 $100,000 $755,000 $75,000 $75,000 $44,000 $44,000 $100,000 $100,000 $250,000 $250,000 36 71510 - Park Acquisition and Development PR212 - Outdoor Sports Court Renovation $50,000 PRNew1 - Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) $500,000 PRNew2 - Rienstra Park Slope Reconstruction $100,000 Subtotal $650,000 71700 - Residential Construction Tax (RCT) PR212 - Outdoor Sports Court Renovation $22,000 PR299 - Greg Rogers Park Restroom Renovation $400,000 PRNew1 - Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) $200,800 PRNew2 - Rienstra Park Slope Reconstruction $200,000 PS145 - Fire Station 5 Programming & Replacement $12,000,000 Subtotal $12,822,800 27351 - California Public Library Modernization LB144 - Civic Center Library Remodel $4,500,000 New LB145 - South Chula Vista Library Renovations $1,000,000 New Subtotal $5,500,000 99999 - ARRA GG204 - Energy Retrofit Phase II $2,000,000 Subtotal $2,000,000 Totals $22,196,800 37 ~'!(?-aTY OF FY 2009-2010 Capital Improvement Program ,~~ CHULA VISTA Five-Year CIP Project Summary Schedule Report Project Name C~tegory Total Project FY2009,-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 Total Cost -I< DR182 Telegraph Canyon Channel Stormwater $950,000 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue DR180 Emergency Storm Drain Replacement Stormwater $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 DR183 Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Stormwater $1,000,000 $300;000 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Avenue to Hilltop Drive GG183 G I S-O rthophotog ra hyfT opogra phy Information $209,965 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Project Technologies GG187 Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks Capital Equipment $372,000 $72,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,000 LB137 Automation Advancements & Upgrade Information $335,773 $102,644 $0 $0 $0 $0 $102,644 Technologies LB143 Civic Center Library Veterans Wing Public Building $95,000 $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 Facilities OP200 Survey Monument Preservation and Other CIP $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Replacement Program OP202 CIP Advanced Planning Other CIP N/A $92,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,000 OP206 Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade Other CIP $93,696 ~1 0,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $50,000 OP208 CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase Information $180,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Technologies OP212 Downtown Parking District Improvements Redevelopment $203,000 $.120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 -- OP217 Palomar Gateway Specific Plan Redevelopment $475,000 $475,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $475,000 OP218 Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Other CIP $373,048 $37;3.048 $0 $0 $0 $0 $373,048 Central City Preserve Area PR279 All Seasons Park Public Park Facilities $2,900,000 $2,009,000 $450,541 $0 $0 $0 $2,450,541 RD241 Storefront Renovation Program Redevelopment $335,000 " $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 STL291 Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Streets and Surface $1,828,167 $235,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $235,000 Improvement , ' STL303 First Ave Impvmts Palomar - Naples Streets and Suriace $1,822,240 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 FYR 1 Category Total Project FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY20'12-13 FY2013-14 Total Cost' mprovemen STL304 Glenhaven Way Amy Slreet Improvments Streets and Surface $726,730 . $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Improvement STL305 Oxford Street Improvents Third to Alpine Slreets and Surface $165,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Improvement STL323 Pedestrian Master Plan Public Safety $256,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 STL342 Second Avenue Improvements-Naples Streets and Surface $125,000 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 Street to Palomar Street Improvement STL346 Pavement Minor Rehabilitation Streets and Surface $1,978,000 $348,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $348,000 Improvement STL351 Bikeway Masler Plan Update Streets and Surface $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Improvement STL352 ADA Curb Ramps FY09-10 , Streets and Surface $504,922 $504,922 $0 $0 $0 $0 $504,922 Improvement STL354 Pavement Major Rehabilitation FY2009- Streets and Surface $2,020,000 $2,020,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,020,000 10 Improvement STL355 Pavement Minor Rehabilitation FY2009- Streets and Surface $450,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 10 Improvement STL357 Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Prop Streets and Surface $3,385,407 . $3,385,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,385,407 1B) Improvement STL359 Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross Streets and Surface $205,000. $205,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $205,000 Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps Construction Improvement STL360 Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L Street to Streets and Surface $353,370 . $353,370 $0 $0 $0 $0 $353,370 Palomar Street Improvement STL361 Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and Pedestrian Streets and Surface $429,200 $429,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $429,200 Improvements Improvement STL362 Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements Streets and Surface $3,300,000 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,300,000 Improvement STL363 Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Streets and Surface $232,440 $232,440 $0 $0 $0 $0 $232,440 Sidewalk Improvements Improvement FYR 2 Project Name Category Total Project FV2009-10 FV2010-11 FV2011-12 FV2012-13 FV2013_14 Total Cost * STL902 ADA Curb Ramps -- Future Years (Placeholder CDBG) N/A $0 S300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,200,000 STL999 Sidewalk Safety Pro9ram -- N/A $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 Future Years (Placeholder) STM354 North Broadway Reconstruction Streets and Suriace $3,719,722 $2,368,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,368,000 Improvement STM355 Olay Lakes Road Widening Streets and Surrace $10,900,000 $2,500,000 $0 $2,500,000 $0 $4,500,000 $9,500,000 Improvement STM364 Heritage Road Bridge Reconstruction Streets and Surrace $2,494,089' , $315,271 $0 $0 $0 $0 S315,271 Improvement STM366 Pavement Rehabilitation for Federal-Aid Streets and Surface $2,610,000 $2,610,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,610,000 Highways Improvement " STM367 South Broadway Improvements, Main Streets and Surrace $2,200,000 $300,000 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 Street to Southern City Limits Improvement STM999 Pavement Rehabilitation - Future Years Streets and Surface N/A $0 $4,400,000 $4,400,000 $4,400,000 $4,400,000 $17,600,000 (Placeholder) Improvement SW234 Sewer Impvts on Colorado bet J & K Sewer $978,529 $777,000 $0 SO $0 $0 $777,000 SW256 Robinhood Ranch II Pump SIn Impvts Sewer $450,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 SW260 Sewer Rehab for FV09-1 0 Sewer $300,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 SW261 Industrial Blvd, and Main Street Capacity Sewer $140,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 Enhancement SW999 Sewer Rehab Future Years N/A . $0 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,200,000 (Placeholder) SW998 Sewer Access Rd Maintenance Program - Sewer N/A SO $50,000 $100,000 $100,000 S100,000 S350,000 Future Years (Placeholder) -- TF274 Traffic Count Station and Maintenance Traffic N/A ,S210,OOO $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $0 $330,000 TF316 Traffic Si9nallnstallation at Second Traffic $375,000 $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Avenue and Quintard Street TF321 Citywide Traffic Count Program Traffic N/A $90~000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $240,000 TF325 Traffic Monitoring Program Traffic N/A $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $0 $480,000 TF327 Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Public Safety N/A $220,000 $230,000 $230,000 $230,000 $0 $910,000 Safety Pro9ram FYR 3 Project Name Category Total Project FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 Total Cost~ Traffic Signal Modification, Fourth & Traffic $777,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 Main, Fourth & Beyer TF331 Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Traffic $690,000 $320,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $320,000 Montgomery TF332 Signing and Striping Program Streets and Surface N/A $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $400,000 Improvement TF337 Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Traffic N/A , $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $1,200,000 Program TF344 I 805 Direct Access Ramp E Hand E Highway Facilities $205,000 ' $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 Palomar TF345 Traffic Calming Program Traffic N/A $130,000 $200,000 $240,000 $270,000 $0 $840,000 TF350 Traffic Signal System Optimization Traffic $500,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $200,000 TF354 Traffic Congestion Relief Program Traffic N/A $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $0 $300,000 TF356 Otay Mesa Transportation System Traffic $150,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 TF359 SR54 Corridor and Arterial Operations Highway Facilities $150,000: $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 TF362 Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 Traffic $402,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 TF366 Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Traffic N/A $325,000 $325,000 $260,000 $260,000 $0 $1,170,000 Upgrade and Modification Program TF370 Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Traffic $350,000 $145,000 $205,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Avenue and Orange Avenue TF371 Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive Traffic $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 and Main Street TF999 Western TDIF Program - Future Years Traffic N/A $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 (Placeholder) Total $54,375,298 $30,743,302 $10,095,541 $9,365,000 $6,805,000 $9,810,000 $66,818,843 *projects with N/A are annual projects, and therefore do not have a fixed project cost FYR4 .$}\{~ ClTYOF FY 2009-2010 Proposed Capital Improvement Program ~l::c::::- CHUlA VISTA Five-Year CIP Project Summary Schedule Report (UNFUNDED) Project Name Category Total Project FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013'14 Total Cost ** DR181 CMP Rehabilitation and Replacement Storm water N/A $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 Program GG187' Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks Capital Equipment $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 GG195 C & R Minor Capital Improvements Facilities N/A - $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000 Management GG204' Ener9Y Retrofit Phase II Public Building $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Facilities GG205 City Facilities Roofing Renovation Public Building $325,000 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 Facilities GG206 Fire Risers at City F aeilities Public Building $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Facilities LB144 Civic Center Library Remodel Public Building $4,500,000 - $4,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,500,000 Facilities LB145 South Chula Vista Library Renovations Public Building $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Facilities PR212 Outdoor Sports Court Renovation Public Park $303,150 _ _ '$72,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,000 Facilities PR299 Greg Rogers Park Restroom Public Park $450,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 Renovation Facilities PRNew1 Greg Rogers Park (Irrigation System) Public Park $800,800 $800,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,800 Facilities PRNew2 Rienstra Park Slope Reconstruction Public Park $300,000 - $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Facilities PRNew3 Hilltop Park Playground Replacement Public Park $44,000 ' $44,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,000 Facilities PRNew4 Bayfront Park Improvements Public Park $6,680,000 $0 $0 $6,680,000 $0 $0 $6,680,000 Facilities PS145 Fire Station 5 Programming & Public Safety $12,055,815 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000,000 Replacement PSNew Bayfront Fire Station Public Safety $12,000,000 -$0 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $12,000,000 SWNew Sewer Lift Station - Bayfront Sewer $12,400,000 $0 $12,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $12,400,000 FYR(UF) 1 Project Name Category Total Project FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013c14. Total Cost *" TF372' Internally Illuminated Street Name Sign Traffic $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Replacement Program - Energy Conservation Grant TF338 Replace City Street Signs (Non- Streets and $335,000 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Illuminated) Surface Improvement Total $55,623,765 $22,196,800 $26,850,000 $7,030,000 $350,000 $350,000 $56,776,800 'Project anticipated to be funded during FY10 mid-year at which time staff will return to Council for appropriation **?rojects with N/A are annual projects, and therefore do not have a fixed project cost FYR(UF) 2 -.'}\{t- (IWOF "f!~:5 CHUlA VISTA FY2009-2010 Capita/Improvement Program Five-Year CIP Summary by Fund FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total Fund Name: Bicycle Facilitie,s Fund (TDA) Fund Number: 72300 Description: . This funds provides support for the region's non-motorized transportation projects including sidewalk and bicycle lane improvements. The revenue comes from 1/4% of the total sales tax assessed in the region. STL351 Bikeway Master Plan Update $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 STL363 Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements $116,220 $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,220 STL999 Sidewalk Safety Program - Future Years (placeholder) $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 Total Uses of Funds $266,220 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $666,220 IFun~~ame: CDBG, Fund Number: 33310 Description: Community Development Block Grant Funds STL352 ADA Curb Ramps FY09-10 $504,922 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 $504,922 $1,200,000 STL902 ADA Curb Ramps Future Years (Placeholder) Total Uses of Funds $300,000 $504,922 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,704,922 IFund Name: Fund Number: 'CDBG,Section 108 Loan 33330 Description: Community Development Block Grant Funds - Section 108 Loan STL342 Second Avenue Improvements- $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 FYF 1 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year TDtal Naples Street tD Palomar Street TDtal Uses Df Funds $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Fund Name: Miscellaneous Transportation Grants Fund Number: 73610 Description: Federal and State Transportation Grants STM364 Heritage Road Bridge $315,271 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,271 Reconstruction STL360 Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L $318,015 $0 $0 $0 $0 $318,015 Street to Palomar Street Total Uses of Funds $633,286 $0 $0 $0 $0 $633,286 Fund Name: Otay Ranch.Village 7 Neighborhood Park Fund Number: 71533 Description: Park Acquisition and Development Funds received for Otay Ranch Village 7 Neighborhood Park PR279 All Seasons Park $2,000,000 $450,541 $0 $0 $0 $2,450,541 Totai Uses of Funds $2,000,000 $450,541 $0 $0 $0 $2,450,541 IFund Name: . Parking Mete: Fund Number: 24110 Description: Revenues generated from Parking Meter OP212 Downtown Parking District $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 Improvements Total Uses of Funds $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 !FundName: prDp1 B Highway Safety Fund Number: 74100 o Description: In 2006-07, the voters of the state approved Proposition 1 B. This proposition included funds to be provided to cities within the state for local roadway FYF 2 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total improvements. STL357 Pavement Rehabilitation $3,385,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,385,407 Program (Prop 1 B) Total Uses of Funds $3,385,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,385,407 Fund Name: Prop 42 Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Number: 73900 Description: Assembly Bill 2928 (Chapter 91, Statues of 2000), as amended by Senate Bill 1662 (Chapter 656, Statues of 2000), established the Traffic Congestion Relief in the State Treasury for allocating to cities and counties for street or road maintenance or reconstruction. STL346 Pavement Minor Rehabilitation $348,000 $348,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $348,000 $348,000 Total Uses of Funds Fund,Name: Public LibraryFed~ral Earmark Fund Number: 27221 Description: Public Library. Funds via Filner's Office LB143 Civic Center Library Veterans Wing $95,000 IFun~N~me: Fund Number: ',... $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 I Total Uses of Funds $95,000 CDBG , R 27412 Description: Community Development Block Grant'- ARRA . STL362 Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 Total Uses of Funds $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 IFund Name: Southwest Project Area , Fund Number: 61110 Description: Southwest Project Area (Tax Allocation Bond) RD241 Storefront Renovation Program $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 FYF 3 STL362 Third Avenue Streetscape Improvements FY2009-10 $800,000 FY2010-11 $0 FY2011-12 $0 FY2012-13 $0 FY2013-14 $0 5 Year Total $800,000 Total Uses of Funds $875,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $875,000 Fund,Name: ' Meiged:Redeiielopment Agency Project Fund Number: 65140 Description: Merged RDA Project (Tax Increment) OP217 RD241 Palomar Gateway Specific Storefront Renovation Program $75,000 $75,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 $150,000 Total Uses of Funds Sewer 'F acj I ity: R,ep lagement , , I IFund,Name: Fund Number: 42800 Description: Revenues in the Sewer Facilities Replacement fund are derived from Sewer Facilities Replacement Fees paid on a monthly basis by all users connected to the City's wastewater collection system. SW260 Sewer Rehab for FY09-10 $300,000 $0 SW999 Sewer Rehab Future Years $0 $300,000 (Placeholder) SW256 Robinhood Ranch II Pump Stn $400,000 $0 Impvts Total Uses of Funds $700,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $300,000 5300,000 $300,000 $1,900,000 - ,.,", ,-,. I ',' 'SewerService ~Revenue - "4141,0 IFunct-Name: Fund Number: 41410 Description: Revenues in the Sewer Service Revenue Fund are derived from monthly Sewer Service Charges paid by all users connected to the City's wastewater collection system. FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total OP202 CIP Advanced Planning $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 GG187 Replacement of Fuel Storage Tanks $72,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,000 OP208 CIP Mgmt & Equipment Purchase $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 OP206 Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $15,000 Total Uses of Funds $115,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $127,000 IfU~~ ~.~,m<~:!, '" "-fSmart Gro~th,lncent~ve '. , . ,. . .. Fund Number: 73654 Description: This innovative pilot program is based on the SANDAG Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) - using funding incentives to encourage coordinated regional planning to bring transit service, housing, and employment together in smart growth development. STL361 Industrial Blvd, Bike Lane and $283,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $283,900 Pedestrian Improvements STL362 Third Avenue Streetscape $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 Improvements OP217 Palomar Gateway Specific $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 Total Uses of Funds $2,683,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,683,900 !Fund N~me: State Library Act Fund Number: 26110 Description: The Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) is a federal grant program administered in California by the State Librarian. Each year the State Librarian awards grants on a competitive basis unless announced otherwise. LB137 Automation Advancements & Upgrade $102,644 $0 $0 $0 $0 $102,644 Total Uses of Funds $102,644 $0 $0 $0 $0 $102,644 Fund Name: 'Telegraph Canyon Drainage DIF FYF 5 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total Fund Number: 54220 Description: Development Impact Funds for Telegraph Canyon Drainage DR182 Telegraph Canyon Channel $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 Improvements, "K" Street to First Avenue DR183 Telegraph Canyon Drainage $300,000 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Study, First Avenue to Hilltop Drive Total Uses of Funds $1,250,000 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,950,000 I Fundt;lame: Fund Number: Traffic Signal 22500 Description: On DB/OBI78, the City Council established Council Policy No. 47B-01 requiring private developers to participate In the financing andlor installation of traffic signals (inlcuding but not limited to design, construction, inspection, modification, striping, etc) on public streets within the City of Chula Vista. The fee collected (as designated in the Master Fee Schedule) are to be utilized for such purpose. TF370 Traffic Signal Installation at $145,000 $205,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue TF371 Traffic Si9nal Modification at $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Hilltop Drive and Main Street TF366 Traffic Signal and Streetlight $165,000 $200,000 $200.000 $200,000 $0 $765,000 Systems Upgrade and Modification Program OP208 CIP Mgmt & Equipment $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Purchase TF354 Traffic Congestion Relief $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Program TF316 Traffic Signal Installation at $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Second Avenue and Quintard Street TF337 Traffic Signal Left Turn $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $1.200,000 FYF 6 Modification Program TF331 Traffic Signal Modification, $20,000 $0 $0 $0 Third and Montgomery OP206 Automation - AutoCAD $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Upgrade Totat Uses of Funds $1,067,000 $707,000 $502,000 $502,000 FY2009-10 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total FY2010-11 $0 $20,000 $2,000 $10,000 $2,000 $2,780,000 TransNet -[ IFundName: . Fund Number: 22700 Description: In the late 1980's, San Diego County voters approved Prop A, which incresed the local sales tax by 1/2% in order to provide funds for needed transportation projects_ This Local Transportation Tax is now known as TransNet. Initially it went into effect on July 1, 1988 and generated for twenty years. It has recently been renewed. DR180 Emergency Storm Drain Replacement STL291 Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements STL303 First Ave Impvmts Palomar- Naples STL304 Glenhaven Way Amy Street Improvments STL305 Oxford Street Improvents Third to Alpine STL351 Bikeway Master Plan Update STM367 South Broadway Improvements, Main Street to Southern City Limits STL323 Pedestrian Master Plan TF366 Traffic Signal and Streetlight Systems Upgrade and Modification Program STL359 Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross Gutter & ADA Ped Ramps $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $235,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $235,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $300,000 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $160,000 $125,000 $60,000 $405,000 $60,000 $205,000 $0 $0 $0 $205,000 $0 FYF 7 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total STL360 Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane, L $35,355 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,355 Street to Palomar Street STL361 Industrial Blvd. Bike Lane and $145,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,300 Pedestrian Improvements STL363 Sidewalk Safety Program - I $116,220 $0 $0 $0 $116,220 Street Sidewalk Improvements OP202 CIP Advanced Planning $77,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,000 OP208 CIP Mgmt & Equipment $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Purchase STL355 Pavement Minor Rehabilitation $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 FY2009-10 STL354 Pavement Major Rehabilitation $2,020,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,020,000 FY2009-10 STL342 Second Avenue Improvements- $25.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Naples Street to Palomar Street STM354 North Broadway $2,368,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,368,000 Reconstruction TF332 Signing and Striping Program $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $400,000 TF344 I 805 Direct Access Ramp E H $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 and E Palomar TF350 Traffic Signal System $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $200,000 Optimization TF354 Traffic Congestion Relief $70,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $0 $295,000 Program TF356 Otay Mesa Transportation $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 System TF359 SR54 Corridor and Arterial $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $90,000 Operations TF362 Kids Walk and Bike to School $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Phase 2 FYF 8 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total TF321 Citywide Traffic Count Program $90,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $240,000 TF325 T raffle Monitoring Program $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $80,000 TF327 Neighborhood Traffic and $220,000 $230,000 $230,000 $230,000 $0 $910,000 Pedestrian Safety Program TF345 Traffic Calming Program $130,000 $200,000 $240,000 $270,000 $0 $840,000 Total Uses of Funds $8,351,875 $2,840,000 $915,000 $855,000 $0 $12,961,875 !FundName: TransNet ARRA Exchange - ,- Fund Number: 22700 Description: TransNet American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) Exchange TF330 Traffic Signal Modification, $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 Fourth & Main, Fourth & Beyer TF331 Traffic Signal Modification, $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Third and Montgomery STM366 Pavement Rehabilitation for $2,610,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,610,000 Federal-Aid Highways Total Uses of Funds $3,360,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,360,000 Fund Name: Enviropmental Mitigation Program Fund Number: 73681 Description: The TransNet Extension Ordinance and Expenditure Plan, approved countywide by voters in November 2004, includes an Environmental Mitigation Program (EMP) which is a funding allocation category for the costs to mitigate habitat impacts for regional transportation projects. The EMP is a unique component of the TransNet Extension in that it goes beyond traditional mitigation for transportation projects by including a funding allocation for habitat acquisition, management, and monitoring activities as needed to help implement the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) and the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP). This funding allocation is tied to mitigation requirements and the environmental clearance approval process for projects outlined in the Regional Transportation Plan (MOBILITY 2030). OP218 Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area $373,048 $0 $0 $0 $0 $373,048 Total Uses of Funds $373,048 $0 $0 $0 $0 $373,048 FYF 9 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total I Fund .Name: Fund Number: Transp,ortation De~elopment 59110 Description: In the late 1980's, City Council established various Development Impact Fees to mitigate the financial burden created by developers of land. The Transportation Development Impact Fee is one of those fees used for construction of transportation facilities in the eastern territories (including but not limited to construction, equipment, etc.). STM355 Otay Lakes Road Widening $2,500,000 $0 $2.500,000 $0 $4,500,000 $9.500,000 GG183 GIS- $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Orthophotog rahyrr opography OP208 CIP Mgmt & Equipment $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5.000 Purchase OP200 Survey Monument $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Preservation and Replacement Program TF27 4 Traffic Count Station and $210,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $0 $330.000 Maintenance TF325 Traffic Monitoring Program $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100.000 $0 $400.000 OP206 Automation - AutoCAD $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5.000 $5,000 $25,000 Upgrade Total Uses of Funds $2.845.000 $145,000 $2,645,000 $145,000 $4,505,000 $10,285,000 IFundName: Trunk SeY(er'Cap_Re~erve' - ,I '<,. - Fund Number: 41300 Description: Revenues in the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve are derived from Sewer Capacity Charges. FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 5 Year Total SW261 Industrial Blvd. and Main Street $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 Capacity Enhancement SW234 Sewer lmpvts on Colorado bet $777,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $777,000 J&K Total Uses of Funds $917,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $917,000 r Yr IV Total of ALL Funds FY2009-10 . $30,743,302 FY2010-11 $5,545,541 FY2011-12 $4,765,000 FY2012-13 $2,205,000 FY2013-14 $5,210,000 5 Year Total $47,968,843 FYF 11 DRAFT PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORTS The following pages, which make up the bulk of the document, contain descriptions of all projects that are being funded as part of this budget. These descriptions include the Location, Responsible Department, Intent, Justification and Funding Allocation. 38 ~11t- CITY OF ~i' [HUlA VISTA Project Location: Citywide Department Responsible: Public Works City of Chula Vista 2009/1 0.2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report , Project Intents: Project Description: Replacement Emergency replacement of failed storm drains, primarily corrugated metal pipe (CrvIP) failures, throughout the City. :"'1 h\stiIication: Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost $0 Emergency repairs must be undertaken to protect life and prapeliy. Project Type: Drainage Total Estimated Cost $1,200,000 39 ~\l/?- CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009110-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: ilK" Street 10 First Avenue ;,!I'~:~> ;~=<:, /1" '; + Engineering Project Intents: Project Description: Upgrade Construction of Dual Reinforced Concrete Culvert between K Street and First Avenue in order to ultimately convey the 100~year FEMA flood. This project will be constructed in cooperation with St. John's School, which is responsible to construct one oflhe t\vo culverts required. The City will pay the incremental costs of constructing the second culvert. .~::.: ,_,.-;.,>;1':: -.......--- ~~:-:.;"~/ -;.'; ;';'-\"""" ~('i,. " \'. 1, \'("~. _- -: \ 'i'. Justification: 51. John's School proposes the enclosure of the existing open channel and is obligated to COilstruct a single underground box culvert. However, t\'.fO culverts are required to ultimately convey the IOO-year FEr..'IA flood without road\.vay and propcI1y flooding. City staff has determined that it is cost-effective and in the City's best interests to construct the second culvert now in order to take advantage of reduced construction costs, when compared to constructing the second culvert as a "stand alone" project. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Drainage Total Estimated Cost $950,000 F\'2013-14 $0 40 :$Wc- CITY 01' '~CHUlAVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: First t\ venue to Hilltop Drive + Engineering >,''-' Upgrade Construction of a naturalized channel within, and immediately downstream of, Hilltop Park needed to stabilize the channel and,~o provide for more natural surface water infiltration through the park. The channel will be planted with appropriate plant materials, while maintaining recreational opportunities within the park. "';.~ Justification: Hilltop Park.has a low-flow concrete channel that was designed to primarily convey nuisance runoff through the park and reduce erosion Dfthe channel bottom. During high-flow storm events, the low~l1ow channel is not adequate to convey runoff and the adjacent earthen sides of the channel erodes. The proposed project would remove the low-now channel, and replace it with an open-celled, vegetated system that would increase infiltration and reduce pollutant transport to downstream receiving waters. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Drainage Total Estimated Cost: $J ,000,000 41 ~\If::.. CITY OF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Information Technology Services Upgrade City purchased software package called IStreet View in 2005. In FY 06, the City purchased 6 inch orthophotography of the City, supplemented vdth two foot contours. Tbis photography will be utilized to update the City's Geographical Information System and is utilized by almost all City departments. Project Location: Citywide Department Responsible: Justification: Orthophotography requires intermittent updates. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: General Government Total Estimated Cost: $209,965 Fund No FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 22110 Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 71700 Residential Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Tax (RCT) 42800 Sewer Facility $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Replacement 73300 Sewer Facility $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Replacement - 73300 41410 Sewer Service Revenue- $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 41410 40300 Transit Capital Projects $0 $0 $0 SO $0 59110 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 42 ::.,\;'\\ 1(.. CITY OF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Replacement This project involves installation of two 10,000 gallon abovc.ground fuel tanks (Llnleaded & diesel) at the PWc. He Project Location: 1800 Maxwell Road Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Public \Vorlcs Justification: 'There is only 1,500 gallon tank of diesel fuel currently available at the PWC. As a result, PW crevvs need to fuel aif-site at Fire Stations 2 & 7. Adding these tanks will allow crews to be more effective and efficient. Tanks are also required to help ensure an adequate fuel supply in case of emergencies. Estimated Operation and tvlaintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: General Government Total Estimated Cost:' $572,000 FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 Pending ARRA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 09200 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 41410 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 43 ;::;,0"IIf::.. CITY OF ~CHUlAVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Library Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Citywide Service Extension This project would aHaw upgrades to all aspects of the Library's internal systems, including inventory management, check out and return of materials, website management and implementation, automated communication with customers, etc. Project items may include, but will not be limited to, a radio frequency identification control system, upgraded materials check-out and check~in systems, automated Library sorting systems, digital customer information screens, etc. In addition to the inventory and check-out/return features, the system will also allow the library to initiate a self~checkout system. La"tly, the system also will automate the Library's sorting system. Justitication: The ability of libraries to meet public service demands regarding tracking and availability of materials as well as achieving efficiency and effectiveness goals depends on keeping the internal systems that support inventory management and customer communication. Estimated Operation and !vlaintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Library Total Estimated Cost: $335,773 44 ~\It::. CITY OF ~ CHULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Library Project Location: 365 F Street Project Intents: Project Description: Renovaticm Funds to acquire books, upgrade computers and technology, and/or establish education and outreach programs Justification: Per the FY2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act (P.L. 111-8) Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Library Total Estimated Cost: $95,000 FY21110-11 $0 45 ~{I?- CITY OF ~1:tff (HULA VI~A City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide .,::': Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering Renovation and Replacement The scope ofwark includes performing surveys to preserve & dCllsify the Citys Horizontal-Vertical Control network to the California Coordinate System Zone G. Numerous control monuments exist throughout the City at a l.mile and Yt mile spacing for the Horizontal-Vertical Control Network. Additionally, survey monuments are preserved fur the Citys Right of Way. Justification: The Professional Land Surveyors Act S 8771 requires that existing survey monuments shall be located and referenced and a Corner Record or Record of Survcy of the references shall be filed with the County Surveyor. The monuments are used to perform various surveys that include Subdivision/Parcel Maps, Record of Surveys, Corner Records, and Improvement Plans. Because these survey monuments provide the basis for re-tracing historical boundaries, as well as establishing new subdivisions, these survey monuments must be perpetuated and augmented in order to accurately define property boundaries and rights- of-way. These survey monuments will be made available via the City's Internet site and will benefit the City Capitallmprovcment Program and private development Estimated Operation and l\/Iaintcnance Cost: $0 Project Type: Other Projects Total Estimatcd Cost: $30,000 Fund No Fund Name Sewer Service Revenue - 41410 1'\'2008-09 SO 1'\'2011-12 $0 41410 59110 $0 $0 SO $0 46 ~\IIf:. CITY OF "~l~':l (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Service Extension Project Location: Department Responsible: Citywide Engineering Performance of varia LIS studies and projects by City. staff, including the Infrastructure Deficiency Database, recycled and potable water planning, infrastructure planning and engineering work related to the application for funds. Justification: Such projects are necessary in order for the City to be able to plan the construction and rehabilitation of its infrastructure in a cost-effective manner. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Other Projects Total Estimated Cost: $897,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 22t to Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 71700 Residential Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Tax (RCT) 414tO Sewer Service Revenue - $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 41410 29200 Special Sewer $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 41200 Special Sewer - 41200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 22700 TransNet $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 29300 Trunk Sewer Capital $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Reserve 47 -01i~ CITY OF ~CHULAVlsrA City of ChuJa Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: , Department Responsible: Public \\'orks ,-,. -' , Project Intents: Upgrade ,;i Project Description: Upgrade of existing AutoCAD system. " , . .1' '''''.;,_7_.~>==-,o " " Justification: The AutoCAD software is utilized by the City's Design Engineers and Survey division in Engineering. This program is vital to the divisions operations as it is the software with which plans/plots are created, calculated, ete for all capital improvement projects. The upgrade will increase the usage and efficiency of the program as technology is everchanging. Estimated Operation and $0 Project Type: l Other Projects Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $93,696 Fund No Fund Name FY2010-11. FY2011-12 FY20l2-13 FY2013-14 22[]o Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 41410 Sewer Service Revenue- $0 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 41410 29200 Special Sewer $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 41200 Special Sewer. 41200 N/A $0 $0 $0 $0 22500 Traffic Signal $0 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 59110 Transportation $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Development 48 911;;.. eln' OF ~ CHULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide ~~ 0A ..,~~ Department Responsible: Public Works -~-,= "-"\ -"-"-"- c-'t(-- -~~' .~ ' ["'___ - I , ~ , Project Intents: Service Extension ::UT.; , k,.,'. "r. 0 This project will provide for a comprehensive elP T'\'lanagcment (including equipment) Program for Citywide Capital i'~',"~'~' . '- ~. Project Description: i.~I~.~~ :'(~!; Improvement Projects. .titln;'V\'!I); i -: - J : ~~:::;:;~u: '-""".""".'.~:?: Justification: Existing elP rep011ing document and database is limited in capabilities and in need of extensive updating and/or rebuilding to meet the growth and storage of the City's entire elP program data. The Independent Financial Review in the Spring of 2007 noted some deficiencies with the City's published CII' budget. The lack of coordinated automated. systems contributes to this deficiency. Additional funding will allow for needed assessment and licenses. Estimated Operation and S14,000 Project Type: I Other Prujects Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: S180,000 Fund No Fund N~lInc FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY20 12-13 FY21113-14 41410 Sewer Service Revenue- S30,000 SO SO SO SO 41410 41200 Special Sewer - 41200 N/A SO SO SO SO 22500 Traffic Signal S30,000 SO SO SO SO 22700 TransNet S30,000 SO SO SO SO 59110 S30,000 SO SO $0 $0 49 , ~ CITY OF 't,,~.3' (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: .' \'i \',"i,::l- _." .<.'~ Department Responsible: Redevelopment and Housing Authority .\ Project Intents: Renovation and Replacement \ \.1 ' , \ ," Project Description: This project \"ill provide for improvements within the Downtown Parking District, including resurfacing of parking lots, It ~"'." '. :'J lighting, signage, landscaping, etc. \ , .- ""\ \ Justitication: Revenues generated from the Parking District need to be utilized for improvements to the District. There has been significant deferred maintenance in the District, specifically in the public parking lot and equipment utilized in the District. Estimated Operation and $0 Project Type: Other Projects Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $203,000 Fund No Fund Name Parking Meter 24110 50 ~Wf:. CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Justification: Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report The Palomar Gateway Oistrict is located at the southwest quadrant of the City ofChuJa Vista. Planning and Building Revitalization The project is the preparation of a Specific Plan for the lOQ.acrc Palomar Gateway District (POD) - the major southern gateway within western Chula Vista. The primary goal of the Specific Plan is to implement the General Plan Smart Growth vision for a higher-density, pedestrian and transit-oriented development area with a mix of shops and office near the transit station, by providing the necessary zoning and regulatory framework, consistent with the General Plan. The project scope includes an extensive Public Participation program to ensure involvement from the community throughout the entire process and crafting a plan that.contains: clear/concise zoning designations and regulations to guide fut\lfe development within the District, including design guidelines for private propeliy and the public realm; a multi-modal mobility plan; infrastructure and phasing plan; market and fiscal analysis; and an implementation and administrative plan, in accordance with Slate law. The result will be a plan that is reflective of the community's vision as a unique place. The PGD Specific Pla.n will be prepared primarily by City staff with some assistance from consultants. '\\' ",\y::\- " .. ,\,\ ", ,<I .~Jr ~i~ ,-. ~'::;''::::..",:-,-" "" \\ .tra The district is characterized by containing a low-'intensity, mixed use development. Some sectors of the district are characterized by an unplanned mixture of incompatible uscs that create land use frictions and hinder the ma'Ximum development potential of the area. The irregular land use pattern throughout the PGD has created a condition characterized by a lack of community integrity, which makes the area vulnerable to economic and physical deterioration. ln order to fully realize the transformation of the district, however, it will be necessary to engage in a Spccinc Planning process to update the antiquated zoning code to reflect the smart growth vision prescribed by the General Plan. The objective of this project is to develop the planning regulation and design guidance necessary to support and effectuate the transformation ofthe PGD into a vibrant/iconic Smart Growth Community Center. In Dreier to further implement this vision, the City will produce a regulatory document that will provide the regulatory framework for intensification through the creation of a PGD Specific Plan, and maximize the benefit provided by the Palomar Gateway Enhancement Grant which involves multi-millions of dollars of infrastructure improvements to the main transpOltation/transit corridor in the project area. These infrastructure improvements have removed a barrier to redevelopment and provide an incentive to attract new development in the District. Completing the Specific Plan will fUliher speed the implemeJltation of the General Plan vision. $0 I Project Type: I Other Projects $475,000 51 ~\\I~ (In' OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report FY2010-11 FY201l-12 FY20J2-13 FY2013-14 61110 Merged Bayfront $0 $0 $0 $0 Towncenter 1 73654 Smart Growth Incentive $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Program 52 ~\If::. CllY OF ~ CHULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Central City Department Responsible: Planning and Building Project Intents: Renovation Project Description: Restoration of the Cactus Wren Habitat in the Central portion afthe City. Project involves clean up and restoration of physical Cactus Wren Habitat area within Chula Vista's Central City :r-vlultiple Species Conservation Program (i'dSCP) Preserve. Activities include site preparations, herbacide treatments, cactus planting, maintenance, monitoring and reporting over a five-year period. Justification: City awarded a grant through SANDAG under the TransNet environmental mitigation program. Estimated Operation and $0 Project Type: I Other Projects l'vlaintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $373,048 53 ~'(~ CITY OF '!~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location. Otay Ranch Village 7, Magdalena A venue Department Responsible: Recreation Project lntents: Service Extension Project Description: The scope of work includes but is not limited to the following: Design and construct for the City a fully functional 7.9-acre park as outlined in the" All Seasons Park, Approved i\'laster Plan", dated February 10,2004 (Master Plan), The park shall include, but not be limited to all components descrihed in the Master Plan. The Project is located in the Otay Ranch Village 7 neighborhood, located on Magdalena Avenue in the City of Chula Vista. Justification: The City Council previously approved by Resolution No. 2006~294 the rvlaster Plan for All Seasons Park, which conceptually designed and provided for the construction of a completed and fully functional 7.6.acre park. On June 17,2003 the Council approved a resolution establishing a Design-Build Priority List excluding fire facilities to be used in awarding Design-Build contracts for future City projects. On February 28, 2007 an RFP (Request for Proposal) was issued to all of the Design-Build firms on the Priority List to prepare proposals for the design and construction ofa completed and fully functional 7.6-acre park, All Seasons Park. Estimated total project cost is $2.51\'1. Council approved a Design Build agreement in May 15,2007. Staff will return to Council at a future date to establish the Gross l\-Jaximum Price fGlvlP) for the project. Estimated Operation and $85,000 Project Type: I Park and Recreation Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $2,900,000 54 ,$\\ If::. CITY OF ~ CHUUlW;fA City of Ch ula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location, . '\\V~,C;:; "C:, " Depatiment Responsible: Redevelopment and Housing Authority \ , Project Intents: Revitalization ' , \ ',\. . " , , , ~' Project Description: The Storefront Renovation Program (SRP) was created to revitalize the downtown area, increase property values and ; 'I ":,,,,' \ ,....... lease rates; increase business and leisure visits: and expand investment opportunities. The requested funds will be used \ for lighting and facade improvements, replacement doors, signage, and landscaping. + -\ ' \ ; Justification: This project is important to the revitalization of the western portion of the City. Estimated Operation and $0 Project Type: I Redevelopment, Ivlaintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $335,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY201l-12 FY2012-J3 FY2013-14 6]] 10 ~]erged Bayfront $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Towncenter 1 65140 Ivlerged Redevelopment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Agency 55 ~\~(f::.. On'OF ~CHULA.VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Sidewalk improvements along Fourth Avenue, between L Street and Orange Avenue. Project Location: Fourth Avenue, between L Street and Orange Avenue Depaliment Responsible: Public Works Justification: The proposed sidewalk improvements are necessary for adequate pedestrian circulation and safety along fourth Avenue. The City currently is in the process of completing the undergrounding of overhead utilities and installation of street lights along this roadway subject area. Upon completion of under grounding and streetlight installation, the sidewalk and street widening work will proceed. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $1,828,167 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 33310 CDBO $0 $0 22110 Gas Tax $0 $0 22700 TransNet $0 $0 56 ~ II{::. CITY OF ~ CHULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: first A venue -' ",,,,,,,~, ' Department Responsible: Engineering " .- " ''', ';.0>-',""'_'<', " ...",." . . . Project Intents: Revitalization :" ~ :, ". ,. '':\' \ <:>11"'"'.' "".' ..~"",::,. .:'- Project Description: This project entails full street and sidewalk improvements as part of the Western Chula Vista Infrastructure Improvement , .' . . " ,. Program, Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program. ;\ .i'''~'':~'!' \ ,^" , ..>:- (,\ . ". . I~ .~. Justification: The residents of this block have indicated a willingness to form a special assessment distict. Upon formation of the district, funds will be appropriated to construct the improvements Estimated Operation and $0 I Project Type: Local Streets Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $1,822,240 57 ~\II,~. (Ill' OF '~f~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Engineering Project Location: Glenhaven Way and Amy Street, west of First Avenue. Project In1ents: Project Description: Upgrade This project entails full street and sidewalk improvcinents as part of the Western Chula Vista Infrastructure.Improvement Program, Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program. ) 1 Justification: Glenhaven \Vay and Amy Street do not have sidewalks and the existing roadway is substandard. Under the Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program, the property owners petitioned, and City Council had formed, an assessment district for the construction of full street improvements, with the property owners paying for the costs of driveway aprons and the relocation of private improvements. All other project costs are being paid through funds obtained through a I-IUD Section 108 Loan_ Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $726,730 33330 22700 58 ~,I{t-. CITY OF ~ CHUI.AVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report This project entails full street and sidewalk improvements as part of the Western Chula Vista infrastructure Improvement Program, Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program. Project Location: Oxford Street, Third A venue to Alpine A venue Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering Upgrade Justification: Oxford Street, between Third Avenue and Alpine Avenue does not have sidewalks, except along one parcel at Third Avenue and Oxford Street, and the existing roadway is substandard. Under the Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program, the property owners have submitted a petition requesting that the City Council form an assessment district [or the construction of full street improvements, with the property owners paying for the costs of driveway aprons and the relocation of private improvements. All other project costs are being paid through funds obtained through a I-IUD Section 108 Loan. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $165,000 59 ~II?- ClTYOF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide ~. ~, Depaliment Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering Revital ization The Pedestrian Master Plan (PMP) will identify missing pedestrian improvements, establish priorities and program capital improvements projects that will increase connectivity among existing facilities. Justification: The PMP will promote safer and more enjoyable environments for pedestrians by detecting areas where missing street improvements could improve environments for pedestrians. The completion of recommended improvements will include links 10 regional bikeways and public transit. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $256,000 72300 Bicycle Facilities Fund (TDAJ 22700 TransNet 60 ::jIlt.- CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Renovation and Replacement This Project entails full street and sidewalk improvements as part of Western Chula Vista infrastructure Improvements Program, Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program. ..,.... Project Location: Second Avenue, Naples Street tp Palomar Street Public \Varks + Department Responsible: Justification: Second Avenue, between Naples Street and Palomar Street does not have sidewalks and the existing roadway is substandard. Under the Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program, the property owners have submitted a preliminary petition requesting that the City Council form an assessment district for the construction of full street improvements, with the propeliy owners paying for the costs of driveway aprons and the relocation of private improvements. All other project costs are being paid through funds obtained through a HUD Section 108 Loan. Estimated Operation and rvlaintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $125,000 61 :)}~/f:. CITY OF ~;d CHULA VlSTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide ;;:1 Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering Renovation and Replacement This project will provide for an on-going program of pavement preservation and may include chip seals, slurry (REAS) seals and thin overlays (less than one~inch thick). Justification: Preventative maintenance and preservation of existing pavement is necessary to cost effectively extend its life and avoid further deterioration of the pavement and base material. Estimated Operation and l\Iaintcnance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $1,978,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-H 27341 C1WMB - Recycled $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rubber Grant 73900 Prop 42 Traffic $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Congestion Relief 62 ~II{:: CITY OF .~ CHULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide Upgrade Update existing Bikeway Master Plan adopted in 2005 to determine current facility needs [or bicyclists, update previous recommendations and cost estimates and prioritize and recommend needed facilties Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering Justification: The City's Bikeway Master Plan needs to be updated eve,I)' five years in order to keep the City eligible for grant funding for bicycle projects. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $200,000 Fund No 72300 Fund Name Bicycle Facilities Fund (TDA) F\'2008-09 $0 FY2010-11 $0 FY2011-12 $0 1'\'2012-13 $0 FY2013-14 $0 22700 63 ~\!(~ CITY OF '~I~1'CHUiJ\ VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project provides for the construction of ADA compliant pedestrian ramps throughout the City. flared sIde :'5~!~._>,....." ~ '\><:~"~i';, "~.' . --, '-~" ,/ ,f,tll.,~i ,,' A_"",.",.. ,. ..:>'!..~ ", .,,,,l'<<,,O:C:"'S/'" ,r' ."1;~': ~, '...\"..' 'h U ~~~~- -p<t;anSili/OPS/ ~".'.'/ . ~,,; ~, "'\ ~./ '. ::.' Project Location. Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Citywide Engineering Upgrade Justification: Existing pedestrian facilities lack curb ramps which limits the mobility of physically challenged persons. The construction oCthese ramps will increase the mobility of these citizens and assist in bringing the City into compliance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $504,922 64 :;:;,,\11(.. CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: City\vide Engineering Renovation and Replacement This is part of an ongoing program of pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction and will include overlays (one-inch thick ~nd greater) and some street reconstruction based on the recommendations of the City's Pavement !\.lanagement System. Justification: Rehabilitation of existing pavement is necessary to cost effectively extend its life and avoid further deterioration of the pavement and base material. Estimated Operation and i\'laintenancc Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $2,020,000 65 ~\(.s CITY OF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Justification: ~-I Preventive maintenance and preservation of existing pavement is necessary to cost effectively extend pavement life and avoid further deterioration of the pavement and base material Project Location: Department Responsible: Citywide Engineering Project Intents: Project Description: Renovation This project will provide for an ongoing program of pavement preservation and may include chip seals, sluny (REAS) and thin overlays (less than one-inch thick). Estimated Operation and r',/Iailltenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $450,000 Fund No Fund Name 22700 TransNet 66 ~\{?- CITY OF '~l::~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovcmcnt Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Renovation and Replacement This is part of an on-going program of-pavement preservation, rehabilitation, and reconstruction and may include overlays (one-inch thick and greater), complete roadway reconstruction, dig-out repairs, chip seals, and/or slurry seals, based upon the recommendations of the City's Pavement Management System. ;co I Project Location: Citywide Department Responsible: Public Works Justification: Rehabilitation, maintenance, and preservation of the City's roadway pavement is necessary to cost-effectively extend its serviceable life and to avoid advanced and rapid deterioration of the pavement resulting from the failure to maintain pavement in a timely manner. Estimated Operation and i'vIaintenancc Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $3,385,407 Fund Name FY2011.12 67 ~\IIf:.. CITY OF ~J~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Naples Street & Oleander Avenue ""., Department Responsible: Public "'orks ,.>iJ>' '...-, :.-~f"i>''''';'''~:-'::-:- t..-~>..~. '&""""',ijl~I~I![iji~"?'''''~ ,,, Jl\Jriillk.. ''10 y~ \'\\ \ \-\ " Project Intents: Project Description: RerioYrltion and Replacement Naples Street & Oleander Avenue Cross-gutter Reconstruction and Pedestrian Enhancements ~~ , Justification: Naples Street and Oleander Avenue is a signalized intersection, but not docs not operate optimally due to deep cross-gutters affecting north-south vehicular traffic, which lllust slow down significantly in order to avoid "bottoming out." This project would improve intersection capacity and provide needed ADA- compliant pedestrian improvements. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $205,000 Fund No FY2008-09 68 .:S.llt-- CITY OF ~(HUlAVlsrA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvcmcnt Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: Project lntents: Project Description: Industrial Blvd. from L Street to Pnlomar Street ~';' :".".:..<';-: "~C' "t +'~i\1; ..".\., ,,' ", [l~:~;~ Engineering Upgrade This project involves installing additional pavement and striping in order to construct a bike lane on both sides of the street from L Street and Bay Blvd. to Industrial Blvd. and Palomar Street. Justification: This project would complete one of the priority projects in the City's Bikeway Master Plan and add an important north-south bikeway corridor. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $353,370 Fund No Fund Name Miscellaneous Transportation Grants FY2008-09 SO FYl011-12 SO FY2012.13 $0 FY2013-14 $0 73610 22700 69 ~\II?- CITY OF ~l;;g (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Industrial Blvd. from Naples 51. to Palomar 5t. Department Responsible: Engineering Project Intents: Upgrade Projt:ct Description: Constructing a bike lane on both sides or Industrial Blvd and constructing curb, gutter and sidewalk on the east side of \.>"H' Industrial Blvd. " Justilication. This would provide additional pedestrian access between the elementary school and mobile home park at Naples 51. and the cOlllmercial area at Palomar 5t. Additionally, the Industrial Blvd. bike lanc is one orthe priority projects listed in the City's Bikeway Master Plan Estimated Operation and $0 Project Type: T Local Streets Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $429,200 Fund No 73654 Fund Name Smart Growth Incentive Program FY2008-09 $0 FY2010-11 $0 FY2011'12 $0 FY2012-13 $0 FY2013-14 $0 22700 $0 ....,.":.,,."",,"i'Ft./.....;.,...,:':..... ~lri'o'jc'ct:'N:lnr~': r~'(;otJ.:ir,'j}'t;'rh,.':,:' ~'J~T.oj~St::~g: 70 .J-II~ Cln' OF ~l~~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improyement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Planning and Building Revitalization Project Location: Third Avenue The goal 6fthe Third A venue Streets cape Improvement Project is to integrate revitalization efforts with a comprehensive street improvement program. Street improvements include "bulb out" traffic calming mensures at pedestrian street crossings; streetscape enhancements such as new median landscaping, street trees, lighting, furnishings and community gateway features, expanded bicycle parking, relocated transit stops and new transit shelters. Justification: This project implements the 2005 General Plan's Smart Growth principals and the 2007 Urban Core Specific Plan (chapter 1 I-Short Term Demonstration project); at no cost to the General fund. Estimated Operation and tvlaintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $3,300,000 Fund No Fund Name FY201l-12 FY2012-13 FY2(113-14 27412 CDBG - R $(1 $0 $0 $0 $0 GI110 Merged Bayfront $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Town~enter I 73G54 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 71 ~II{:: CITY OF 1'~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovemcnt Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Upgrade I 1_ ' ,",<" .' . ;." l-~,~~~t;~\ [-,' ,. ,,:/'.\ ,. [ ;':~:::i". ~^- ~"~ ~~':', ..;.:\\' \ '.\ " \. ;-": ; !. Project Location: North Side of! Street between Hilltop Drive and First Avenue Department Responsible: Engineering Installation of pee sidewalk, ADA compliant pedestrian ramps and driveway approaches, and upgrade existing pedestrian ramps to ClIlTCnt ADA Standards. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: This segment would fill in the gaps of missing sidewalk on the north side of! Street between Hilltop Drive and First Avenue. This project will increase the safety of pedestrians at the proposed location. The project is located within 1000 feet of Hilltop Drive ElementalY School. SO T Project Type: I Local Streets $232,440 Justification: Total Estimated Cost: Bicycle Facilities Fund (TDA) 22700 TransNct SO ~)hl:o jitt_:N-;;>ile1'SSTtlwt~rk?srfcl9.'i?l~ggrffi;1":':Str~1;erS-itl~~~f,~ikJf ;;i6t'O"f '~~,~:~j~~tJq?lt~"~~i$1Dl~3\jil;,~,~~"~~;}~~~~';~[f:t;~~:[~.,f" ~f.~~~,,~,s~i~:~';~ SO F\'2010,11 $0 I'Y2011-12 SO FY2012-13 $0 F\'2013-14 72300 $0 72 ;$\11(,- CITY 01' ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovcment Program Project Description Report Project Location: Broadway between C Street and 0 Street + ,~;i'I!II;-- ," ':,::.', ~;::",)lljil~"_" ;;,; , -,I: ~I' ~ -~ ;,-:.-.,.,,,,,,";' j ~ - ': \ I ~:.. \ - ':\ \ ---;:-1-'", l\t...'.\ ,,'''-' Depm1ment Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering , Renovation and Replacement . The purpose of tile project is to provide ultimate drainage system improvements to this project area that flood during periods of intense rainfall. In addition, this project will fe-construct the pavement section that is beyond overlay repair. Justification: This project will provide for street improvements and construct drainage facilities along Broadway from D Street to approximately 200 lineal feet North ofC Street. The scope of the work consists of a full street reconstruction, portions of curb & gutter, sidewalk, and driveways to be replaced, retrofitting pedestrian ramp to meet current ADA (American Disability Act) standards, replacement of traffic loops with video detection cameras, installation of approximately 2000 lincal fect of storm drain pipes, clcan-outs and curh-inlet structures within the project limits. Improvements will also be completed within the City of National City. This work consist of installing approximately 20.0 lineal feet of storm drain pipe and connecting it to an existing curb-inlet structure that discharge storm run-off water to the Sweetwater river. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: l\'lajor Streets Total Estimated Cost: $3,887,722 Fund No Fund Name Miscellaneous Transportation Grants Residential Construction Tax (RCT) 22700- TransNet ,,'<'<<<,,~ )H"'- ;"'P::::~. .,,-~,,_,: .;;-.'<.,~ .;.-",~+,,-t:-- '.J',r-:/'''c'' 1"'."%.".':'c>'..i!. mrt~ j~f~~~;~tiJ.~-.:m.ti W~\~.~L9~~1 \~~~y~,I~SC,.9~,~H',~,~t}q, :.;:-,,,,."!'t'7'.,,;r:.df1-.~S"_ ~- 3 '4"C2'''' -.,:.,J:;?S',,,,,,'-...'.'f!..,,;;"" .i'_t'''': ~rro.J ~~t~~~:~'"~.i_!>J}~l:.),_J,"5?q,.~K~~,->~l4';;Jt~:,~4} 71700 $0 1'\'2012-13 1'\'2013-14 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 33310 73610 CDBG 1'\'2008-09 $0 $2,178,000 73 ~\II?- CITY OF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitalllllprovelllent Prog,"alll Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Upgrade ."\~~~jl':C'\,' '\~ y,'" ~t\'/\:."~~~\ , ",m;;f2Tf,.f;~~~}:':~:: Project Location: Otay Lakes Rd, between Telegraph Canyon Road and Ridgeback Road and East H Street at Otay Lakes Rd Department Responsible: Engineering Widening of Otay Lakes Road between Telegraph Canyon Road and Ridgeback Road to six-lane major standards and East H Street at eastbound Otay Lakes Road to accommodate duulleft-turn and dual righHurn lanes. This project will be built in 2 or 3 construction phases. Justification: Segments of Otay Lakes Road uperate below threshold levels of service during peak traffic periods. This project will widen Otay Lakes Road to six.lanes between Telegraph Canyon Road and Ridgcback Road and will widen East H Street from Otay Lakes Road to the west, including dual left-turn and dual right-turn lanes from eastbound East H Street to Otay Lakes Road. This project will be constructed in 2 or 3 phases, as needed to meet established levels of service. The first phase will include ultimate improvements within East H Street and within Otay Lakes Road from Ridgeback Road to approximately 400 feet south of East H Street Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost; $0 T Project Type: I Major Streets Total Estimated Cost: $10,900,000 Fund No 59110 FY2010.1I $0 FY2013-14 $6,080,700 74 ~ (In' or- n",~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista . 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Heritage Road at Otay River, South of Main Street """ ",,,,...,,,1 '/"" Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Des~ription: Engineering j/"~ , , -' , Service Extension Preliminary Engineering, Project Design, and Environmental Analysis to determine the ultimate configuration and alignment of the Heritage Road Bridge over the Otay River, south of Main Street, needed to meet ultimate traffic demands at development build-out ,/'~ ~ Justification: In order to accommodate projected growth in southeastern Chula Vista and to link the City to Otay Mesa, the Heritage Road Bridge will ultimately need to be widened and/or realigned. This project will completeLI) preliminary engineering to determine the bridge's ultimate configuration and alignment; (2) environmental evaluation to determine environmental impacts, constraints, and mitigation requirements; and, (3) construction plans and specifications. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: iv!ajor Streets Total Estimated Cost: $2,494,089 Fund No F\'2011-12 F\'2012-13 F\'2013-14 73610 Miscellaneous $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transportation Grants 59110 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 75 ~lft.- eln' OF .~~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering +" " _.-..i~l~yti~;~.,. ~ ,- ..r'\~I?~).-:;~~~:.~.:--~ta,.!;ti"V~ "",""?V, ",c'".' ..;g.,^,. ,.," ,....",.{_.,t- ,-, '" "i',~;:;:.".-,.." ...t,.t",,'.1; . .., ,~"w'!;'~..;t'.>~:;At,,~ ' Ji, *">~p/ 'J;' -~ - .. i~"',: \, , ,\'., , 1 Project Location: Collectors and Al1erials Citywide Renovation This will provide major pavement rehabilitation, primarily overlays, for major streets and al1eriaIs that qualify for Federal funding Citywide. sl Justification: Estimated Operalion and r-.'laintenance Cost: This project will improve safety, appearance and pavement life for major streets in Chula Vista. $0 Project Type: rvlajor Streets Total Estimated Cost: $2,610,000 Fund N"amc 76 ~\I?- CITY OF ~ CHUIJ\VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Revitalization , ,~. cd'.=,1Ir + '=-J(..-.....; \\ L...-.....,L.,,.-:=ij. =-f-~ ;wr-=-1:..3:~':- >c, ="~~~ \~~;!. I,. I ,,III, Project Location: Broadway, Main. Street to Southern City Limits Dcpartmont Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Public Works Construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk, drainage Cacilities, and pavement replacement in Broadway, between fI.'lain Street and the southerly City limits \. ',\ Justification: This segment of Broadway lacks full street improvements and is the only remaining segment of13road\vay without sidewalks. Completion of these improvements will provide full pedestrian facilities along Broadway with City ofChula Vista and will connect to existing pedestrian facilities within the Cities of National City and San Diego. Estimated Operation and tv1aintenance Cost $0 I Project Type: I Local Streets Total Estimated Cost: $2,200,000 77 ;sWt- CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Engineering ~~;c~; \'~ ~il I~l\~~-'<'"-' '):'t.J Project Location: Colorado between J and K Renovation and Replacement Project involves the replacement of approximately 1,313 feet of 15 inch vcr with an IS-inch pipe on Colorado Street between "K" and "]" Street. Estimated Operation and iVlaintcnance Cost: Improvements required to mitigate capacity constraints in Colorado A vcnue Sewer. $0 'T Project Type: I Sewer $978,529 Justification: Total Estimated Cost: Fund No Fund Nnrne F\'2008-09 F\'20 12-13 F\'2013-14 41300 Trunk Sewer Cap Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 29300 Trunk Sewer Capital $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Reserve 78 :s'lf(.. CITY 01' ~!~~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Robinhood Ranch II . J~~t~~t~~ . 'il5f1~;!ltt'~' ;'~.~~ '~';ct~~~ Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Public Works Replacement This project involves the preparation of a preliminary design report, plans, specifications and cost estimates (PS&E) needed to fal.:ilitate the construction of improvements which will enhance the opcrability,and safety of tile Robinhood Ranch II pump station. Juslillcntion: The Robinhood Ranch II SPS was originally built in 1975. When it was originally constructed, it was located next to a streambed, which causes the lift station to be subject to periodic flooding. This is inconsistent with our current design standards. The surface of the \vet well has been experiencing rapid deterioration due to infiltration. This has caused an increase in the required maintenance and repairs to the pump station for the past several months. In addition, due to the current configuration of the pump station area, the vehiculnr access to the pump station needs to be improved. The goal of this project is to analyze, determine, and design the required improvements to mitigate these issues. Estimated Operation and lvlaintenance Cost: so Project Type: Sewer Total Estimated Cost: $450,000 42800 FY2008-09 $50,000 FY2011-12 $0 79 ~'II?- CITY 01' ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Renovation and Replacement The purpose of the project is to repairlreplace deteriorating sewer lines and manholes within the collection system identified as having significant structural deficiencies by the City's video monitoring program. Project Location: Citywide Department Responsible: Public Works Justification: Failure of any sewer pipe would resutt in significant loss of function within the system over an extended period of time in addition to potentia! water quality impacts or public health and safety impacts. Estimated Operation and l'vlaintcnance Cost: $0 Project Type: Sewer Total Estimated Cost: $300,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2012-13 $0 42800 Sewer Facility Replacement ". """";"'';''. ,,"'.'~"''',~,;''i'''!'':;''.'''';''_:,;;'f''''-::'''''':';-":.'J"",/ t '~~ojepiN_~lllC :~LSe;'yCi',,:~ehab-- ~.,.t:."",,;'~":_"";'iP'4."!,:.,m..,."......i":_ , p,i:{)ject'l'\o::~/"S\V.~60' 80 ~w?- CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovcmcnt Program Project Description Report Urgradc i\ '- --~---, HI . ;1\\ " , " ' . \\,1 r "~I -_.'-- '-- - "1 ; Project ~o'cation: Department Responsible: ~roject Intents: Project Description: Intersection of Industrial Boulevard and Main Street Public Works The project will study the confluence of two significant sewer lines within the intersection ofIndustrial Blvd. and ~'laill Street (within MH# 5106) to determine and design improvements to increase capacity within the system in the area. , i [<<... -...--.- I. 1_.0 , :1:' :' J; 1____ :~..:-::J ~, ..!.... Justification: Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: The location has been identified through the City's flow metering program as an area exceeding current design capacity thresholds. $0 Project Type: Sewer Total Estimated Cost: $;40,000 FY2008-09 $0 FY2013-14 $0 81 ~Iff:. CITY OF ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Service Extension ,.'p'>,;\,-:, ,"I.-"'~' -I>- _ ... ';;";'1 ~.. QiI/';;"ij~\ll'!,'''''- .'<r; ........cr.'. t~~ ~""<f-l3!uf1,~- !1..;5"~":'j;q;;~~f;~~'~'C:ffi~'\Rij [1 ~(\','v 'f,.:~,E".~~j':'-.5:,'.-o:-~:' 'J~}1~~'~'~1 l'i\,:.r~l.",""i~"1;,,,< '~'J&f~k-l i~\, "'-6''''''-/ ! """~. \1'"1 .~11l:'l;~'{/')'( ~.'. d~ . ,.~4, i. '~<;;;1~ ;'f:~~'\%;~ ~ ",~ "".+' ,'-- '\ - ~\ !' .---..-..'\ Project Location: Eastern Chula Vista Department Responsible: Public Works Installation of permanent traffic count stations, which includes software and hardware, to monitor the traffic volumes/capacity of the major streets within the City on a continuous basis. This project will be on-going as necessary to collect/monitor data and create reports. Justification: Count stations are needed to assist in accll1'ately forecasting levels of service based on existing and added developments. Estimated Operation and !'vlaintenance Cost: $0 Proj ect Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $540,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2008-09 FY2013-14 22700 TransNet $0 $0 59110 Transportation $0 $0 Development 82 ;;j.1/?- (In' OF ~ CHUllWISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Installation of a fully actuated traffic signal system. .,..,,:0-.;.- \. "::~-\:{;';S,~~ \~. Project Location: Department Responsible: Second A venue and Quintard Street " . ;:::> ,*\~::, Public Works Project Intents: Project Description: Service Extension Justification: Intersection is at close proximity to Castle Park j\'Iiddle School. The intersection is ranked No.4 on the 2002/2003 Traffic Signal Priority List and this intersection has met the warrants for tra me signal school crossing. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $4,500 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $375,000 83 ;$\If;;.. CITY 01' ~CHULAVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital1mprovcmcnt Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide Public \Vorks + -' -;'v' ~ \~~,;~~r ,,~ );,. J~',:, ." Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Annual program that will provide for traffic count data and information as part of the Traffic Volume Count program. t~~' _ 1-P ~ .1.,:t.~. ..'L.ILd.ho.,....;.~,!J"W ...:} i.c~,~~ c;:ol Justification: Traffic counts arc required to provide data for safety commission studies, Traffic rvlonitoring Program (TMP), citizen complaints and various traffic management isslles. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $390,000 84 ~I({:. CITY OF ~ H~~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chllla Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvcmcnt Program Project Description Report Public V'larks ~I Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Citywide Justification: The project will provide for transportation planning studies associated with the GMOC's critical circulation system including Traffic Monitoring Program studies, transportation forecasting and intersection analysis. The intent of this project is to insure compliance with Gt-.'IOC threshold standards. This project is listed in: RTIP 08-00 CHV45 (Maintenance) All studies will be performed in order to understand and identify development's cumulative traffic impacts and it recommend mitigation measures consistent with GMOC goals. Estimated Operation and l\'laintcnance Cost $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $780,000 22700 59110 TransNet $20,000 1'\'2013-14 $0 $0 Fund No Fund Name 1'\'2008-09 S50,000 $50,000 1'\'2010-11 $20,000 $100,000 1'\'2011-12 $20,000 $100,000 1'\'2012-13 $\00,000 85 ::$'\{t.- Cln' OF ~ (HUlA VJ5fA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Citywide Department Responsible: Public Works Project Intents: Project Description: This project will provide engineering support to address citizen requests/complaints, and provide for the implementation of traffic calming measures to address the requests/complaints (including resolutions adopted by the Safety Coinmission regarding traffic related issues). This includes, but is not limited to, the following tasks: field investigation, collection and analysis of data, management of citizen requests, preparation of studies and rcports, preparation of new City guidelines and/or policies to by approved by the Safety Commission and/or City Council, purchasing of traffic calming equipment, providing signing and striping, and public education. This project is listed in: RTIP 06-00 CHV34 Justilication: This project ,.viII address the challenges of a growing Transportation Network and assist with the reduction of speed and enhancement of safety through education. Estimated Operation and SO Project Type: I Traffic Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $1,330,000 Fund No FY2008-09 FY2011-12 SO FY2012-13 $0 FY2013-14 22110 86 ~\I If::. CITY OF ~ CHUlJ\ VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Fourth and Ivlain, Fourth and Beyer i:~::'::: Ii -I: '''-.J= I ~'-3 t=}t;"~'~f'-'-*~~ j '=-':'~~I~l I'---r" , -=-',: -.' '1-1 ' " - ~ 'Ii"'"- ',~\ '" ~,::-, +--- I Department Responsible: Public Works Project Intents: Project Description: Renovation This project will provide for repair work of existing traffic signal equipment to allow for optimal signal operations and update the signal system to current city standards and lengthen the lifespan of11le traffic signal as \vcll as improve its maintenance and operations. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: These aging traffic signals arc in disintegrating condition and in need of major repair and/or modifications. $0 I Project Type: Traffic Justification: Total Estimated Cost: $777 ,000 Fund No Fund Name 22500 Traffic Signal $0 22740 TransNet ARRA $0 Exchange 87 ~\Iff::. CITY OF ,~ CHUIA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Intents: Project Description: Replacement of existing traffic signal equipment at intersection and installation ofncw 4-phase traffic signal. II ! ,I I 11-c.'""'L -== I 1=__--:11::: ! .,,_. I' _j~__~: II ,------ .'--- ~- 11=i-l~---:~ ,~-. J Project Location: Third and I'vlontgomcry Department Responsible: Public Works Estimated Operation and l'vlaintemUlce Cost: Condition of existing signal is beyond repair and/or modification. Replacement oftmme signal will assist with maintenance and .improve traffic circulation and intersection safety along Third ^ venue and will provide vehicle detectioll. $0 T P,oject Type: I Traffic $690,000 Justification: Total Estimated Cost: Fund No Fund Name FY2008-09 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 F\'2013-14 22500 Traffic Signal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 22700 TransNet $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 22740 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 88 ~11f::.. CITY 01: .tt!~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Depmimcnt Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Public Works sl Project Location: Citywide This project will provide for grinding/sandblasting of existing striping, pavement markings, installation of new signs and striping, traffic control and protection/restoration of existing improvements within the City. This project will also address the challenges of a growing transportation network and assist with traffic calming, and increasing safety along roadways. This project is listed in: RTIP 08-00 CHV35 (Maintenance) Justification: Program will allow modification of existing striping and signage at various locations due to lane adjustments ill an effort to improve traffic flow and overall safety of the roadways. Estimated Operalion and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $613,680 89 ~II?- CITY OF ''!.~~ (HULA VISTA Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Justification: Estimated Operation and i'vlnintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Citywide , ,A~' ~ "J + '1X~/1A.;,' I 1 .' ,~;;,";~:,;~Ji:("';:)~!''7;. \~ ,~ '.. ", 'r-.riA~~~;>~---:-:~,,1t't~1o---1;lS;;!4W1'~';{ ;'''~~ -'_f. . '\,,/ ~~~:.t~t41g:-~~ \, .\':.mt.)..,..-;!...;,.t"!~;:~'lt;~ ni.~J l . ..tV}~",:1 ~"" ~,;%/l;. ".J. . ""';M .,.c!;J'i.~:a,~';4~" ., ..,,\~-\;..<~ . )l~.. t ~ ~~ :.!:f:." ,.t-\- Public Works Upgrade This project includes the data collection and analysis of left-turn movements at signalized intersections in order to create a priority list of signalized intersections that warrant modification. Based on available funds, this project will also upgrade traffic signals with protected. left turn phasing based on this priority lis!. The following intersections are currently ranked no. 1/2 on the priority list: Fourth Avenue & 'G Street (scheduled modification FY 09110), and Broadway & Oxford Street (scheduled modification FY 10/11). .,,1 Will allow motorists to safely maneuver left turns into the intersections during a protective phase thereby enhancing traffic safety, reducing broadside accidents, potentially decreasing delays and improving air quality. $0 Project Type: Traffic $1,376,649 90 ~\I/f:. CITY or- ~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovcmcnt Program Project Description Report Project Location: 1-805 Department Responsible: Public Works Project Intents: Service Extension Project Description: IntcHlgenc)' coordination with Caltrans and SANDAG during preliminary engineering and design of managed lanes, interchange modifications and improvements on 1-805 for carpool (HOY) Janes. Possible on/off ramps planned at East Palomar Street and East H Street interchanges, including highway widening, restriping, signal improvements, transit facilities and landscaping. This project is one of SANDAG's Early Action projects for Transnet II. Justification: This project will allow staff to coordinate with Caltrans on the design of improvements. Callrans and SANDAG are studying improving 1-805 to eight (8) general purpose lanes plus four \4) managed lancs for ultimate freeway buildout. Estimated Operation and $0 T Project Type: I Traffic Maintenance Cost: Total Estimated Cost: $205,000 Fund No Fund Name TransNct 22700 91 .=$\lf{:. CITY OF ~t!~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: project Intents: Project Description: Public Works . ._~o\:_~---'.J:J -.J_ . ....-:1/~\,,'ot~:~>ijlt~~J' _.. "I -. \t."^\",'~;,.1"0:::/':<'i t'i~""_::~"~.' i7"".~i/i '4 'u', . "y"" "~" . .. , I" I ~, _;~~::~._.'~. ,'; ,. '':- ,~~-;r\}.:14.~~~rr~~'.:~ .! ".\ ,':4'~,~io,U;:~ l;\i ..~~ ,41'" ~~:_ \) , ~~W ,,'-l- ..I~! h r~"_~'W 0 iIoJ....~ 81 Project Location: Citywide This project will develop traffic calming guidelines and/or polices, will update/analyze traffic collision records, and will implement and manage traffic control devices on public streets citywide. Tn addition, this project will be Ilsed as a local match funding source for traffic related grant opportunities. This project is listed in: RTIP 06-16 CHV 33 Justil1cation: With the increasing number of schools build in the City, staff has received an increased number in citizens requesting traffic control improvements as a result of traffic concerns related to speeding, congestion, parking, signing and striping near school. This program will allow staff to coordinate with school officials and citizens requesting traffic improvements in planning, implementing and managing school traffic. Estimated Operation and M~inlenal1cc Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $1,084,600 FY2010-11 FY2011-12 92 ~\If:.. CITY OF ~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvcmcnt Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Public Works :~I Project Location: Citywide Upgrade This program will provide consultant services for the City to assist staff with upgrading existing trame signal coordination to improve traffic circulation, reduce intersection delays and reduce congestion throughout the City. City CV and SANDAG obtained TLSP (Traffic Light Synchronization Program) Grant for three corridors ill Chula Vista: Broadway, H Street & Palomar Street. This project is listed in: RTIP 08 CHV39 (CR) Justification: Nev,' developments in traffic signal coordination technology are now available that can greatly improve the efficiency oftmme signal operations and more effectively coordinate traffic signals to reduce travel times, delays and congestion along the City's major traffic corridors. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $500,000 Fund Name 1'\'2013-14 93 ~Iff:.. CITY OF I'!!!~... CHUIAVISIA ~::i:.-::Z- City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Citywide :::CI Public Works This program will ~llow for identification and implementation of solutions for congestion relief on local streets. Remedies may include activities sllch as median installation for safety improvement or left turn movement; new traffic signals, Protective Permissive Left Turn (PPL T) installation, signal removals, traffic signal upgrades, intersection studies to detennine/justify traffic signal installations/modifications, signal intersection lighting, traffic signal coordination, tmftic signal interconnection, video traffic surveillance systems, and traffic data/count collection systems for performance monitoring purposes. This project may also help initiate the creation of new CIP Projects to address larger scale projects that require additional funding. This project is listed in: RTIP 08.00 CHV 43 (CR). Justification: The TransNet Ordinance allows for at least 70% ofrc"cnues providcd for local street and road purposes be used to fund direct expenditures for facilities contributing to congestion relief. This project allows for efforts that arise outside of other established CIP projects. Estimated Operation and Ivlaintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traftic Total Estimated Cost: $500,000 94 ~\l{{:. CITY OF ~CHULAVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Otay Mesa Transportation System Project Locntion: . State Route (SRI II and SR 905 Public Works Justification: This project will allow the City ofChula Vista to coordinate with Caltrans, SANDAG, the County of San Diego and the City of San Diego regarding proposed changes in land uses, Port of Entry, and circulation element roadways (SR-lIlSR-90S) that affect border region and the southerly portion of the City ofCV. This project is listed in: RTIP 08 CI-IV44 (CR) Estimated Operation and ivIaintenancc Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic. Total Estimated Cost: $150,000 Fund No 22700 95 ~\lf:. CITY 01: 'f:!~ (HUlA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/1 0-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Department Responsible: SR54 Public Works Project Intents: Project Description: State Route 54 Corridor Improvements and Arterial Operations Justification: During the peak periods of travel, there is much commuter lost time due to existing lane geometry bctwecnlhe on/off-ramps. This project will allow City staff to meet with regional stakeholders such as Caltrans <lllcl SANDAG in order to expedite improvements to State Route S4 due to impending smart growth trends expected on the City's west side. Increased density is expected in the areas generally bounded by I-80S to the east and SR-54 to the north. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $150,000 Fund No FY2013-14 22700 96 ~ CITY OF ~~:E'~ (HULA VISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvcmcnt Program Project Description Report Department Responsible: Public Works 'C'il Project Location: Citywide Project Intents: Project Description: This project is to gather data from residents living across the entire City through community meetings and walking audits (at 36 deferent elementary schools) regarding miss,ing or desired pedestrian related facilities within residential communities and neighborhoods. Each walking audit will be facilitated by WalkSanDiego, a local grassroots, non. pro lit organization focused on improving \Nalkability throughout the region, per City agreement of$194,310. The City applied for a grant funding through the Community Based Transportation Planning Program and the applicntion was approved. The City has accepted the grant funds per resolutioos 2008-003, 2008-004, 2008-005, 2008-006, and lOOS-007, Justification: Estimated Operation and rvtaintcnance Cost $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $402,000 Fund No Fund Name FY2013-14 $0 22700 Kids Walk and Bike to School Program TransNet 73652 97 -S,II;;.. CITY OF '4'~ CHULA VISTA City of Chllla Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capitallmprovcmcnt Program Project Description Report Upgrade Upgrade and maintain traffic signal and streetlight systems including, but not limited to, improvements to interconnect conduits and cables, vehicle detection systems, uninterruptible power supplies, signal signage, emergency vehicle preemptions systems, signal controllers and appurtenances. This project also includes the update of the Traffic Signal Improvement GIS Database Layer. This project is listed in: RTIP 08-00 CHV35 (l'vTaintcnancc) +' .i,~t\:\ ~~ " ~.,.;f'-;!",1f:";:::,',.u:~J:\' . ~ . 1""\"'~~;~':-' ".~;",-:.:,,",~:: ~\lIl.'ffi.ftv 'S'~:'( .l'<':\-'/J.l}!",,-......';\'t.'S'1, -!-''; h\x.~'. " ';;~~1~:'f.~ );>- .-J,r_<d?....... '..:>;.!;If.'~'''''~! ,J~';.; :F~~\&7:i'.?1Hi"~ ~.:,' "J.." ).~ "lfr' v'<r.:::~<#... 1', .. . .l!;c~J~(tr 'l':ic,' \,} i'j~ r;~wg"-~ \-,.\ )>' , .';'T:.?~- {,,-~. ~ ,,1-. ~-"" to_~,i.i~ ........' ir.,;".~~ ,," I Project Location: Departmcnt Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: Citywide Public \Vorks Justification: Proper maintenance and utilization of new technology on traffic signal and streetlight systems helps ensurc signalized intersections within the City operate as efficiently and safely as possible. Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 Project Type: Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $1,518,003 1'\'2010-11 1'\'2011-12 1'\'2012-13 $200,000 $60,000 1'\'2013-14 98 ,::S\llf:. CITY OF ~ (HUl.A VISTA City ofChula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Depattment Responsible: Project Intents: Project Description: '---\;.;-------\~~~~;-'{I .....-=--'~;;:::@.,"-:~~::~'i! I j :~:~~li '(II 1_.,_I~~"."_j~:=:=-._=~Li_...." .."l~__."._. ,'- J Intersection is at close proximity to Otay Elementary School. The intersection is ranked #2 on the 2005 Traffic Signal Priority List and this interection meet the Warrant for Traffic Signal Installation. Engineering Project Location: Intersection of Albany A venue and Orange A venue Service Extension Installation of fully actuated Traffic Signal System Justification: Estimated Operation and Maintenance Cost: $0 I Project Type: I Traffic Total Estimated Cost: $350,000 99 ~I/t- CITY OF .~ CI-lULAVISTA City of Chula Vista 2009/10-2013/14 Capital Improvement Program Project Description Report Project Location: Intersection of Hilltop Drive and i\,lain Street :".'. ... ,0' iLii- ;;,'(~l -, ;,." ~ ,y....... " Department Responsible: Engineering -' U:''-'j"l! ! t /:: ,,;'1='1 IIT"~",,,,,,, .. tf' .r .~.~" Project Intents: Upgrade I ~h~-- I'-~'-' . Project Description: This project will provide for repair work of existing traffic signal equipment to allow for optimal signal operation and 'i";",,,, .' -\ ..,,,:,.1 update signal system to current City standards and lengthen the lifespan of traffic signal as well as its maintenance and ; I.. ;"1 rI- ." operations. I' F 1 I. ~ , Justification: This aging traffic signal is in disintegrating condition and docs not meet current design standards, and is in need of major repair and modification. Estimated Operation and $0 I Project Type: I Traffic iVlaintenance Cost: Total Estimatcd Cost: $250,000 Fund No 1'\'2008-09 FY2012-l3 22500 100 GLOSSARY OF FINANCE AND BUDGET TERMS Accrual Basis of Accounting - The accounting basis used by the City by which transactions are recognized when they occur, regardless of the timing of cash receipts and disbursements Accounting System - The collective set of records and procedures used to record, classify, and report information on the financial status and operations of the City. Accounts Payable - Amounts owed by the City to external entities for goods and services received. Accounts Receivable - Amounts due to the City from external entities for goods and services furnished. Adopted Budget - The title of the budget following its formal adoption by resolution of the City Council. Amended Budget - The title of the budget version that includes all amendments to the Adopted Budget approved by Council throughout the fiscal year Appropriation - A legislative act by the City Council authorizing the expenditure of a designated amount of public funds for a specific purpose. Audit - An examination of City records and accounts by an external source to check their validity and accuracy. Bond - A certificate of debt issued by a government or corporation guaranteeing payment of the original investmentplus interest by a specified future date. Budget - A spending plan and policy guide comprised of an itemized summary of the City's probable expenditures and revenues for a given fiscal year. Capital Expenditures - Expenditures related to the acquisition, replacement, or improvement of a section of Chula Vista's infrastructure. Capital Improvement Program - The long-range construction plan designed to foresee and address the City's future capital needs. Capital Project - Any major construction, acquisition, or renovation that increases the useful life of the City's physical assets or adds to their value. Debt Service - Payment of interest and repayment of principal to holders of the City's various debt instruments. Depreciation - The expense incurred with the expiration of a capital asset. Direct Costs - Operational expenditures exclusive to a specific service or program. Discretionary Revenue - Revenues that are generated by general or specific taxing authority such as Property or Sales Taxes. 101 Encumbrance - The designation of appropriated funds to buy an item or service. Fiscal - Of or pertaining to the finances of the City Fiscal Year - The twelve-month period beginning July 1st and ending June 30th of the subsequent calendar year. Fixed Assets - An asset with a useful life greater than three years. Full-time Equivalent Positions - The conversion of a part-time, temporary, or volunteer positions to a decimal equivalent of a full-time position based on an annual amount of 2,080 hours worked. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - A uniform set of minimum standards for external financial accounting and reporting. Gann Appropriation Limit - A State of California mandated appropriation limit imposed on local jurisdictions. General Fund - See Operating Budget. General Plan - The fundamental policy document that guides the City's future growth and development. General Revenue - See Discretionary Revenues. Grants - A contribution by a government or other organization to provide funding for a specific project. Grants can either be classified as capital projects or operational, depending on the grantee. Indirect Cost - Costs that are essential to the operation of the City but not exclusive to any specific service or program. Indirect costs are primarily associated with support departments such as City Clerk, City Attorney, Administration, Management Information Systems (MIS), Human Resources, and Finance. Infrastructure - Basic physical assets such as buildings, streets, sewers, and parks. Interest Expense -Interest costs paid by Chula Vista on loans and bonds Liability - Debt or other legal obligations arising out of past transactions that will be liquidated, renewed, or refunded at some future date. Memorandum of Understanding - A document detailing the outcomes of labor negotiations between the City and its various bargaining units. Municipal Code - A collection of ordinances approved by City Council. Operating Budget - Costs associated with the on-going, day-to-day operation of the City. Ordinance - A formal legislative enactment by the City Council. 102 Other Expenditures - All budgeted expenditures that do not fall into one of the three primary expenditure categories: Personnel, Supplies and Services, and Capital. Personnel Services Expenditures - Salaries, wages, and benefits paid for services performed by City employees. Program Revenue - Revenues generated by a given activity. Proposed Budget - The title of the budget prior to its formal adoption by resolution of the City Council. Reserves - The portion of the General Fund balance set aside for contingencies. Resolution - A special order of the City Council that requires less legal formality than an Ordinance. Spending Plan - A preliminary budget approved by Council contingent upon subsequent adoption of appropriations. Supplies and Services Expenditures - Expenditures for supplies required for the daily operation of the City and for contractual and professional services. Yield - The rate of return earned on an investment based on the price paid. 103 INDEX ~~:JD~~.pl DR180 DR182 DR183 GG183 GG187 LB137 LB143 OP200 OP202 OP206 OP208 OP212 OP217 OP218 PR279 RD241 o R7';fr,j"A G"E' "...,...__;...___..n.,___".....__",'_n,.! 26501800 Emergency Storm Drain Replacement 26501820 Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvements, K Street to First Avenue 265018300 Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study, First Avenue to Hilltop Drive 21041830 21041860 22051370 22001430 21492000 21452020 21462060 21482080 21492120 21402170 21402180 23072790 25042410 G:E'j,fE-~'Ai!fG q:VER}fr-.(EN:tl GIS - Orthophotography I Topography Project Fuel Tank Removal and Replacement at John Lippitt Public Works Center li.loB RA R.Y: .m._..._.__._n_m'._'''m__.'''.....:l Automation Advancements & Upgrade Civic Center Library Veterans Wing QJ:rH,!:'~::,E,R.Cl;J~QI~S. Survey Monument Preservation and Replacement Program CIP Advanced Planning Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade CIP Management & Equipment Purchase Parking Meter Replacement Program Palomar Gateway Specific Plan Cactus Wren Habitat Restoration - Central City Preserve Area PAreR K-~A HD'?~E C:R E AnON All Seasons Park R,EDEV E',E:ofiTMEN, 'T,.',,';, __..,_.__..._..._",.._.,U...::......,......._ "'",,' ,,.. Storefront Renovation Program t~ ~Q 2!Q ~J ~2 '\3 ~4 ~5 ~_9. '47 :~8 Ill) ~O 5.1 53 54 '55 104 105 SE.liii"E'RS~ ~."._ J SW234 26052340 Sewer Improvements on Colorado, J to K 178 SW256 26092560 Robinhood Ranch II Pump Station Improvements (Surrey Drive) ,79 SW260 26002600 Sewer Rehab for FY09-1 0 ItD SW261 26002610 Industrial Blvd, And Main Street Capacity Enhancement $1, [:J:~:~~:~J~T~] TF274 24522740 Traffic Count Stations '(3~ TF316 24553160 Signal Installation - Second Ave and Quintard St 83 TF321 24553210 Citywide Traffic Count Program 8;'1 TF325 24573250 Transportation Planning Program .8Q TF327 24563270 Neighborhood Safety Program 8~ TF330 24563300 Traffic Signal Modifications, Fourth and Main and Fourth and Beyer ail TF331 24563310 Traffic Signal Modification, Third and Montgomery ~~ TF332 24563320 Signing and Striping Program a~ TF337 24563370 Traffic Signal Left Turn Modification Program 9Il TF344 24573440 I 805 Direct Access Ramp East H and East Palomar ~~' TF345 24573450 School Zone Traffic Calming 'gz TF350 24583500 Traffic Signal Optimizatior> 9~ TF354 24583540 Traffic Congestion Relief Program M TF356 24583560 Otay Mesa Transportation System Improvements 95 TF359 24583590 SR-54 Corridor and Arterial Ops 9,,6 TF362 24593620 Kids Walk and Bike to School Phase 2 9.7 TF366 24593660 Traffic Signal and Streetlight Maintenance !'fa TF370 24503700 Traffic Signal Installation at Albany Avenue and Orange Avenue 99 TF371 24503710 Traffic Signal Modification at Hilltop Drive and Main Street 'ioi:) 106 '0 , 1~11 q ~ IJl~1 ,"II. ~-~ "\ L~J~,~ Expenditure Cuts a, Implementation of budget reduction plan . 258,75 FTE cut . 110 hourly positions cut . >50 managers cut . $7,6 million saved by cuts to managers . Department heads cut by 36% b, Operational reviews c. 8T AR Program ~~ I i .. ;~~'-':"'>.f.l~ .1' ,(t'1':' . ,",} . ...., ~= ,.".=~~ ~~J~~ 'A~' '- General Fund $132,844,444 $132,844,444 Budget Adjustments $121,600 $121,600 Updated General Fund $132,966,044 $132,966,044 Other Funds $157,143,187 $166,101,471 Adjustments to Other Funds $530,000 $918,700 Updated Other Funds Budget $157,673,187 $167,020,171 rgp:aat~1Aiif~u;;a~d~tBt$29PT6:39!23~~T986~ Note: The expenditures over revenues is due primarily to CIP projects which received revenues in previous years and are now being budgeted. I.J~:I'1:u'I::~. library Police '::)"'1~:,I:.III.h' Allocate donation for Heritage Musuem Funding for South Bay Youth Counseling (from Asset Seizure) SUBTOTAL GENERAL FUND ADJUSTMENTS :4~' 1,600 $ 120,000 $ 121,600 $ "'i" $ $ $ 1,600 120,000 121,600 FUNDt_ m0!"i DESCRlPTIONiltK~ ~ ('~~ \_ R 0M"i REV~"f;; "l!EXP ~0"1 652/653 - 2000 TABs 391 -Fleet 241 - Parking Meter 256- Asset Seizure 245- Traffic Safety Fund 274 - CDSG Fund 227 -Transnel r ;.;,:'::"t;"':";i:;: Close oul Fund and Merge with Fund 653 Remol.e budget for Fire generators - exp in General Fund Monthly maintenance for multi space pal1ling boxes Transfer to General Fund for South Bay Youth Counseling 14 Police Vehicles and associated equipment Add nfoW CIP - 3rd A~nue Streetscape Reduction in pavement rehab - Project STM367 SUBTOTAl OTHER FUNDS ADJUSTMENTS $ $ 45,000 (15,000) 6,000 120,000 462,700 500,000 (200,000) 918,700 45,000 $ (15,000) $ $ $ $ 500,000 $ $ 530,000 $ $ $ XOJ,<\t:AJ..L,f..UNDS 'ADJ,l.ISJ'M ENIS// c" $ 66);600' $ '''O~O.300j Y.'.'.:: 3 '. '. IfBr11 q I. Expenditure Cuts a. Implementation of budget reduction plan . 25875 FTE cut . 110 hourly positions cut . >50 managers cut $7.6 million saved by cuts to managers . Department heads cut by 36% b. Operational reviews c. STAR Program - ),,; .; "" -~. ..' '." :~'.:;' 'I "1.1,,' . I,. , . ~,;;~": ' ".~ ~It~~.~; II. Revenues a. City fees b. User fee review c. Local taxes d. City leases and contracts III. Economic Development a. Bayfront b. University and Technology Park c. Eastern Urban Center d. Western Chula Vista Revitalization Program IV. BudgeUFiscal Reforms a. Detailed fiscal impact analysis b. Update Fiscal Policies c. Development of Chula Vista Long- Term Financial Strategy d. Development of zero based budget 2 ~ General Fund $132,844,444 $132,844,444 Budget Adjustments $121,600 $121,600 Updated General Fund $132,966,044 $132,966,044 Other Funds $157,143,187 $166,101,471 Adjustments to Other Funds $530,000 $918,700 Updated Other Funds Budget $157,673,187 $167,020,171 tfJ~~~Iif~~Wl'$2To16~~!9tl!ir6j2m Note: The expenditures over revenues is due primarily to CIP projects which received revenues in previous years and are now being budgeted. ,,;.>=' """""'.K_"1,"'M!I~l::l.'R.~@:!wNM::a;.:.J'1!t'~1 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 121,600 $ 121,600 1.::;I;,I'1:u,',I:;l,'I"",,,,,,,,,.iYR&'11 ;:l..."i~:j!:AII'ln,:"'t,~.~_.~.~=~.~:_~~~_ library Allocate donation for Hentage Musuem Police Funding for South Bay Youth Counseling (from Asset Seizure) SUBTOTAL GENERAL FUND ADJUSTMENTS 1;l11~IHcmh~~~~%~lj~"'i"i;.I;.ll'I.l:"~"" ~. ~~_ %.}~-& 552/653 - 2000 TABs Close out Fund and Merge with Fund 653 391 Floet Remo...ebudget for Fire generators - exp in General Fund 241 - Parking Meter Monthly maintenance for multi space parking boxes 256 Asset Seizure Transfer to General Fund for South Bay Youth Counseling 245 - Traffic Safety Fund 14 Police Vehicles and associated equipment 274 - CDBG Fund Add new CIP - 3rd A'venue Streetscape 227 _ Transnet Reduction in pa'vement rehab - Project S1M367 SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS ADJUSTMENTS 'tt@!ilil?'(fflP'/IM';l::ll'~%Th~;:);i~ $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ (15,000) $ (15,000) $ 6,000 $ 120,000 $ 462,700 500,000 $ 500,000 $ (200,000) $ 530,000 $ 918,700 $ Hij'0Wf;;i7~~*'K';f~ifM~>:roJAL{"ALC'[l)NO~~QJlJ.$JM.ef1lJ$1iPill'iii.:.%.0A\,iffk{"'0t~$~6.$jt60,QZi~1~(l40i;tOO.a J '~~: '~'I .~ ',. "'\ ,',.' :.~,. ,. ..,J' ,,:-,,_,. .' ,.,I~ ".;,' .":, t . ii ,. ~ ; 'f-">'~ .. -ttl .d Total Revenues $290.6 million Charges for Svcs. 15% Development Impact Fees 1 % Other Revenue 11% Other Agencies 16% Use of $ and Prop 1% Fines, Fort, Penalties ~ 1% / Licenses & Permits 1% Tranfers In 19% Property Taxes 14% Sales Tax 9% Total Expenditures $300.0 million Redev Agency 10% Sewer Funds 10% Transit Funds 1% Capital Project Funds 9% Debt Service Funds 7% Development Service Funds 2% 4 .' - '.. ~- ....,. ..' -.- General Fund Development Services Parking Meter Police Grant Fund (less CBAG) Environmental Services Fleet Transit Sewer RDA Housinq Total Citywide CBAG Total- All Funds 939.00 70.00 0.50 1.00 3.00 10.00 3.00 46.00 10.00 7 1089.50 20.00 1109.50 869.50 39.00 0.00 4.50 4.00 10.00 3.00 46.00 4.00 7 987.00 18.00 1005.00 -69.50 -31.00 .0.50 3.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -6.00 0.00 -102.50 -2.00 -104.50 4; History of Staffing Reductions - OUA_ , 0 , , . . - ... t Redevelopment 14.00 5.00 (9.00) -64% Recreation & Nature Center 43.25 25.00 (18.25) -42% Planning & Building 91.50 53.00 (38.50) -42% Library 68.75 40.25 (28.50) -41% Administration 28.00 17.00 (11.00) -39% Human Resources 25.50 16.00 (9.50) ~37% Engineering 74.00 48.50 (25.50) -34% Finance 33.50 22.00 (11.50) -34% ITS 28.00 19.00 (9.00) -32% City Attorney 14.00 10.00 (4.00) -29% City Clerk 8.50 6.50 (2.00) -24% Public Works 260.00 220.00 (40.00) -15% City Council 15.00 13.00 (2.00) -13% Police 364.50 326.50 (38.00) .10% Fire (Excluding Dispatch) 141.00 136.00 (5.00) -4% Fire Dispatch 11.00 (11.00) -100% Animal Shelter 22.25 22.25 0% CBAG 17.00 18.00 1.00 6% Housing 4.00 7.00 3.00 75% CITYWIDE TOTAL 1,263.75 1,005.00 (258.75) -20% 5 Utility Users Taxes 6% Personnel SelVices 77% General Fund Expenditure $133.0 million Su pplies & Services 11% Other ,- Expenses 1% Utilties 4% Debt Service! Xfers Out 7% General Fund Revenue $133.0 million Charges for Other Local Services Taxes TOT 401 2% 2% 10 Other Revenue 7% Property Taxes 21% lnterfund Reimb. 7% Franchise Fees 8% Transfers In 9% e Licenses 14% 6 ': 1 ' '~f'" ..;' <, ~~, "'~:";';;'" ~_l\" ~. J'c:_?'j_. "y'" ;-; ol!~h . "0-1 ' _ ~,;,':R~t'*"~ ,~. ;\;IIY' ":<, ";')}'."l :t.'!'t~i '~~~s:",~i;.;~, -~'q1'f,,~'!J-'r',~ .~"~I..~.=",, -:. \;~i,< 25% 20% 15% 10% - -8% 5% 0% 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 Council 8% Reserve Policy approved in 1996 Revised policy to be updated as part of the Fiscal Health Plan Fiscal Year 2009-10 CIP by Funding Source Miscellaneous Miscellaneous 0.4% library Grants 06% Traffic Signal 3.5% ........____ Sewer Funds 5.6% De\€lopment -Impact Fees 13.3% Park ACqUiSiti~~ Redel,\81opment and De\i\2!lopment \''--- Funds 6.5% 3.3% 7 Fiscal Year 2009-10 CIP by Project Type Major Streets 26.3% Drainage Gen Govt/Other 8.0%( Projects/RDA 4.4% Library _____ 0.6% Sewer 5.3% Fiscal Year 2009-10 CIP by Geographical Area Citywide 47% Eastern 19% Southwest 4% 8 Expenditure of Non-development CIP Funds by Region Total Other City Areas - Funded 24% Total Weste' City Area- Funded 76% That Council adopt the resolutions appropriating funds for the operating and capital improvement budgets for the fiscal year July 1, 2009 to June 30,2010. 9 MEMO ~ \ ft.. --.- ~~~ --- -- CITY OF CHULA VISTA Department of Pub I ic Works DATE: June 9, 2009 TO: The Honorablc Mayor and City Council VIA: Jim Sandoval, City Manag . Scott Tulloch, Assistant C ty I anagcr""";7 / Iracscma QUil~tant Dircctor ofEngineenng Response to Theresa Aceno CIP Qucstions FROM: SUB.IEeT: For your infon11ation, the following questions wcrc raised by Thercsa Aceno rcgarding the proposed CIP. Attached is staffs responsc which was c-mailed today to Ms. Acerro. Il'you havc qucstions, pleasc contact Iracscma Quilantan at 409-5976. Attachment: 1. Response to Ms. Acerro 2. Original e-maill'rom Ms. Acerra MEMO ~\ft- -.- ,~ ~~ CITY OF (HULA VISTA Department of Public Works DATE: June 8, 2009 FROM: Theresa Acerro Iracsema QUilan~stant Director of Engineering CIP Questions TO: SUBJECT: I am responding to your em ail to Rick Hopkins dated June 6, 2009 which requests answers to the following 12 questions. Rick is on vacation this weck. If you have additional questions please contact me at 409-5976. 1. STL362 Why are streetscape improvements only for E-ll. The rest of Third needs them too and would actually benefit more since there are more thriving businesses. As pal1 of the implementation of the Urban Core Specific Plan (DCSP), adopted in 2007, several short-tcnn key demonstration projects wcre identified to spur reinvestment in the Urban Core, with a specific focus on the Third Avenuc Village (UCSP Chapter X, Section I). The segment of Third Avenue within the Village was selected as a priority due to its location as the traditional ccnter of the Urban Core and the need to prioritize public investment along this major pcdestnan and business corridor. Future planning efforts in the southwest will evaluate the need for similar improvements along segments of south Third Avenue, as described on the 2005 General Plan. Initial Design Workshops for the Southwest planl1lng effort are being planned over the next few months. For further infom1ation on this question, please contact Mary Ladiana, Development Planning Manager, at 409-5432. 2. Why in time of economy distress are we spending so much Oil a Pedestriall ftlaster Plall, which essentially is using the data already collected by Engilleerillg staff to write a report that will essentially say the same thing we have all kllown for years. Also does Ilot seem like the time to be spending filllds Oil a Bikeway i\laster Plall Update The proposed ClP adds $45,000 to STL 323 to update the existmg Pedestrian Master Plan (PMP) whieh will expire in 2010. The PMP identifies missmg pedestrian improvements; helps establish priontles and program capital improvement projects that will increase connectivity among facilities. FUl1he11l10re, the PMP is a ncw requirement with very specific criteria by SANDAG for any local agcncy to compete for Iimitcd funding oppol1unities that enable the City to provldc cnhanced or improved pedcstrian factlitics. Thc City does not have a pedcstrian master plan that meets the SANDAG requirements; the existing PMP is a list of infrastructure deficiencies. The PMP update will also document efforts with HEAC and the walking audits of the elementary schools which improve safety and connectively in the City. The grant revenues reccived as a Theresa Acerro June 8, 2009 Page 2 restilt of the PMPand the Bicycle Master Plan far exceed the proposed expendllures. The following is a partial list of grants received to make pedestnan and bicycle improvements: . Industrial Blvd - Bike Lane & Pedestrian Improvements ($248,000) . Bicycle Amenities for commuters (plior year appropriation) . Safe Routes to School- Rice/Otay Elementary School ($451,000) . Harborside Elementary Pedestrian Improvements ($490,000) 3. What is meant by lVlain Street and Industrial Blvd. Capacity enhancements? (Isn't slowing traffic to 5 miles per hour with round-about likely to restrict tlte capacity and divert tlte traffic-especially trucks- off of Industrial??) SW26l is a sewer project to improve the efficiency of flows within tbe sewer systcm at Industrial Blvd and Main Strect and ultImately enhances sewer capacity at this location. With regard to the second question in 3 above, this is the SmaJ1 Growth Grant tbat the City received last year and it is to provide street and pedestrian improvements at Industrial Blvd. fi.om Palomar Street to Ada Street aJ1d some improvements on Palomar Street too. Since these are street improvements to provide for new facilities, it is not considered maintenance and as such, SANDAG criteria for the Transnet Program call it "Capacity Increasing". Maintenance is for those category of projects that replace wom out facilities or for paving projects that provide a new surface that has been applied at no more than I-inch thickness, usually an oil seal coating on thc roadways. 4. Wlty do traffic signals at 4th and Main and Tltird and lIJontgomelT need modification?? Tltese are not intersections tltat appear to have problems. The traffic signals at Fourth Avenue/Main Street and at Third Avenue/Montgomery Street need to be updated. The signal standards and mast anns need to be replaced with new indications and hardware in the controller box. Tbe signal at Tlllrd Avenue/Montgomery also needs significant work since we are installing the new signal equipment at the ultimate location so that the street improvements, primarily on the east side of the street, can be constructed as soon as the City reaches agreement with the medical building owner Dr. Sanchez. The street improvements were a condition of the medical building, but first the traffic signal needs to be moved before the strcet improvements can be constructed. Main Street/Fo11l1h Avenue was initially tumed on in 1989 and the corner that has the traffic signal controller box needs to be upgraded due to poor underground condUIt condition. Since the corner is an agricultural field, the dust created by that site has caused repairs to be made to the equipment qUIcker than at other locations citywide. The project will improve and upgrade the signal equipment. Third Avenue/Montgomery Street was initially turned on in 1973 so this signal is 36-years old and industry standard is that after about 20 to 25 years of service, a traffic signal should get a Theresa Acerro June 8, 2009 Page 3 major overhaul. Similarly, as part of the East L Street undergrounding project, not related to these two, we are replacing the overhead flashing beacons located at the top of the hill near I-80S since they are from the 1960's. All signals need on-gomg maintenance hut after two or more decades of use, then they need major upgrades to keep running smoothly. 5. TF370 - How call a trajjic light be ill two separate years p 99? Don't you have to put these ill all at ollce? This is a busy illtersectioll, but there also is allother light half a block away alld Orallge is all extremely busy street. I turn there a lot alld a sigllal would be more convenient, but?? TF-370 is a new traffic signal at the intersection of Orange Avenue/Albany Avenue shown 111 two fiscal years mostly due to cash flow and project scheduling purposes. In the first fiscal year, the costs will allow design to be completed but the signal improvement cannot begin construction until the subsequent fiscal year because there are not sufficient traffic signal fees in deposit to be able to do this project 111 one fiscal year. Other considerations made include the amount of avaIlable City staff to perfonn the work without an impact to another CIP project's schedule. 6. I also turn at Hilltop aud Maill a lot alld the sigllal does not appear to be broken?? The traffic signal at Main Street/Hilltop Drive needs to be modified since the current traffic signal standard in the westbound direction is too short and docs not meet current State and Federal standards. The FHW A staff was here at a meeting with us earlier this fiscal year and they noted that thIS signal needed to be updated. When you are westbound on Main Street and you want to make a left turn to go south, the left turn indication at the end of the traffic signal mast ann should be long enough that it is over the left-turn lane and it is instead over the westbound through lane. This makes it somewhat confusing to westbound motorists. ThIS signal was originally designed by the County of San Diego and became our signal during the annexation. The eastbound signal mast arm is just barely long enough to extend into the turn lane so it is okay to leave alone, so we will not do that one with this project. 7. LB144 &145 We are culling hours but we are remodeling the libraries?? Couldn't money be belieI' spellt keepillg them opell lOllger? Funds in LB144 &145 were specific to remodeling grants and are now on hold due to the State budget shortfall. These funds can only be used for capital improvements at libraries and may not be used for operational expenses. 8. PS145 Station 5 It is completely unacceptable that this replacement is beillg plallned for lIext to the Orange libra/)'. We have been promised a park in that right of way since the lIew pole were put in almost 3 years ago. Recently a group of us meant with parks staff alld this was the first choice for a new soccer field, dog park alld other park facilities because the libr",)' restroom .I' alld parkillg could be used!!! Parks are a priority. The fire chief Theresa AceITo J line S, 2009 Page 4 whe/l he was at the SWCVCA meeti/lg said the statio/l did /lot /leed to be here. He said a t11'O story statio/l could be built where statio/l 5/1011' is. fIe said the decisio/l 0/1 location had not been made. This budget shows this location and '09- '10 as the year it will be built, (although it shows it as u/lfou/lded). This is a/l outrage to the southwest commlll,ity a/ld auother example of lack of respect for the commu/lity a/ld its /leeds!! He also said they did /lot have the mO/ley, but obviously they now do have the mO/ley. 1t needs to be spent where the statio/l /1011' is NOT HERE. A librlllY parki/lg lot is /lot an acceptable locatio/l for a fire statio/l and SDGE has provided money for a park. We wa/lt the park here. The site next to the Library located at Orange Avenue is identified in the Fire Station Master Plan as a potential site to relocate Fire Station 5 in an effoI1 to Improve call for service delivery. Cunently, the City does not have the funding to pursue the re-building or relocation of Station 5. However, the Fire Department will be pursing American Recovery & Reinvestment Act grant funding (ARRA stimulus funding) that will allow the City to rebuildlrelocate Station 5 as described in the Fire Faeihty Master Plan. As It is cUITently described in the Fire Facility Master Plan, the Orange A venue project sIte possesses the "turnkey" elements that are needed to successfully compete for ARRA funding. The City will be hard pressed to identify funding for this project if ARRA funds are not granted. Station 5 predominantly serves the southwest portion of the City and is the second busiest in the City's fire station network as it delivers more then 3,500 calls for serVIce a year. Station 5 also serves the area of the City where most of the fire incidents occur. Unf0l1unately, Station 5 finds itself in an advanced stage of deterioration due to its age (55 years). As a result, this station is no longer cost effective to repair/maintain. By relocating Station 5 next to the library on Orange A venue, the City can save money by not having to purchase land. The Orange Avenue SIte also affords the needed square footage that is necessary for the Fire Department to deploy the adequate number of fire/rescue vehIcles required for future service delivery. The Fire Chief indicated when he met with the SWCV ACA that they had not finalized the location at that tIme and this was before the grant stipulations were published, whIch reqUIres the "shovel ready" status. The Fire Chief also indicated that the current location was not suitable for a new station because of the size, and that a two story station can be bUllt, but the current site is still too small. The proposed sites for parks are not impacted by the proposed Fire Station 5. Conceptual designs indicate the Fire Station could be located in a portion of the library parking lot. Currently there are no funds available for construction of Fire StatlOn 5. If Economic Stimulus funds were awarded then staff would solicit input and prepare plans that would address the fire Station and proposed parks. 9. TF Why is Otay /llesa Tran^])()rtation System allocated to 1I10ntgome'J' area. It is (/ questionable expense and should be allocated to the east where 125 connects to Otay /llesa, 110t MOlltg01l1C1T Theresa AcelTO June 8, 2009 Page 5 Otay Mesa Transportation System - You are correct and your comment noted that this one should be shown as Eastem Territories and not Montgomery since this project affects the Otay River crossings east ofT-80S only. This will be corrected in the fmal ClP document. 10. Your divisions Montgomery, Southwest, western City make no sense at all. fVhat is the purpose of this? Things listed under the southwest are part of the Montgomery annexation as are some oft/lings in Western City. DivIsions for Southwest, NOlihwest and Eastern Territories are consistent with the Council auopted terminology for geographic areas listed in the General Plan Update that Council approved about 4-years ago. In consultation with the Development Services Department, we need to refer to areas by the adopted General Plan and the uividing lines for each area are L Street/East L Street anu the I-80S freeway. As such, anything east of I-80S is considered the Eastem Territories. Anything west of I-80S and north of L StreetlEast L Street is the Northwest area. Everything west of I-80S and south of L Street/East L Street is considered the Southwest area/Montgomery Area. We are not using the redevelopment boundaries or armexation areas used before the GPU was adopted. We have used Westem City if we know that the project is entirely west of [-805 but is also in both the Northwest and Southwest areas. 11. page FYF3 shows fund number 61110 Southwest Area Tax allocation bond $75,000 as going towards storefront renovation project area-Is this confined to E-II Street as is implied? Yes. The funds arc coming from 61 I I 0 (Bay front/Town Center I) and, therefore, the expenditure is confined to Third A venue between E and H Street or the Bayfront. However, we also have budgeted $75,000 from 65140 (Merged Project Area) primarily for Broadway, but those funds could be spent in all project areas except Eor (BayEront/Town Center I). For further information on this question, please contact Eric Crockett, Asst. Director of Redevelopment and Housing at 476-5341. 12. The five year forecast seems to be very iI/adequately funded Yes, you are correct in that the City's infrastructure needs far exceed available funding. Significant challenges continue to face the City due to deteriorating mfrastructure that has exceeded service life and due to limited availability of resources. The proposed five year capital improvement forecast is intended to be a multi-year planning instrument whICh helps the City identify and plan infrastructure improvements and keep the residents informed of how the City plans to address signIficant capita1needs over the next five years. M :\Enginccr\Correspondence\Acerro response.doc Iracsema Quilantan From: Sent: To: Subject: Richard Hopkins Monday, June 08, 2009 2:58 AM Iracsema Quilantan FW some questions and comments about CI P budget Hi II~f pJ.s handle -0rigir'al Message---- From: "'I'HEEESA ACERRO" <thacerro@yahoo.l.::nm> To: "Richctrd Hopkins" <RAHopkins@ci. chula-vista. ca. us~' Sent: b/7/09 3:52 PM 0ub~i ect: ~ome 'lues tiOIlS ann comments ahollt CI P budget P Budget 2009-20J.0 1. STL3[)~ Why i'tre streetscape impro'.rements (.iDly for E-H The rest ot Third np.eds them t~o and wOllld actudlly benefit more since there are more thriving businesses ~:. Why in timp- of ecnnomy distresb dre ';,'e spendinej so much on d Pedestrian ffi2.ster Plan, whi,:h essentially is IlSi!lq the data alreacty collected by engj.neering staff to write a report that will esseIltially say the same thiny we have all known for years??~ Al~o ,ioes not :;;eem like the t inle to be spending fun,js on n. Bikeway IVJaster Plan' IJpdate J. What j.s meant by Maj.rl StreAt And Industri~l Blvd. Capa.rity enhancemerlts? (Isn't slowin0 trattic to 5 rniles pRL hour with round-about likely to restrict thp capacity and divert - the traftic-e~pecially trucks- off of Industrial?? 4. Why do traffic ~ignals at 4tll and Main and Thirrl and MontlTomery need modification?? The~e are nut intersections that appear tu hdve problems 'l. TF370 H'-IW can A trnffic lif}ht be in t',.1O separate years p 99? Don't you hFlve to put these in all at O[1,:::e? Thi ~ is a busy intersection, hul: there also is an\Jther liqht half a hlock away and urange is aD extremely busy street. I turn there a lot and a sj.gnal WOllld be more convenient, but?? G. I a1s8 turn at HilJ :-op and Main 2. 10t 2nd tho. ~-,c:i(Jn;jl_ rlC1Ps not appRri.r to be brokE:.'n?? 7. LB144 &145 toJe are cuttinl} hc.mrs but we are remodeling the librariesC?? Couldn't money be better spent keeping them cpen longpr? 8. PS145 3tatiun 5 :U- is complel:ely unacceptable ,that this replacement i:::; being plonned for next to thp Orange library. We have been promi~ed a park i.n that right of way since the new pole were put in alrnclst 3 years ago. Recently a group of us meant with parks statf and thi.s was the tir.st choi,=e for a nE::W .soccer field, dog park and otber park facilitie~ uecause the lib.rary restroollls aDd parkillq could be useu!!! Parks are a priority. T1Ie tin:c rhief wh~n he was at the SWCVCA meeting said the station diu not neeu to be here. He said a two story station '~ould be built where station 5 now is. He saiu the decision on location had rIot bpe]~ made. This hud~et shows l:his location and '09 '10 as the year it will be built, (although it ShC1rJS it as unfe,undf;d). This is en outrage to the southwest I_oommunity anrl. another examplE": I,t lack of 1:espect TO,l. llle conUTlunity and its needs!! He alsc, 0aid they did not hdve the mODI-:>Y, but ,-,bviously they now do havp the money. It needs to be spent 1l'ihe.ce the statiml now is NOT HERE. A library pal.kin'~ lot is not an ~~cep~able locatioIl f0r a tire statiLID and SDGE hFiS fJ.cnvideri muney for a park. He \vant thr:; park here. ~1 TF 1:ri/hy is Otay [vIes;:;. Transportation System <'J.llocateJ 1-0 Montgompry al.ea. It is "3- ~uestionable expense and shruld be allncated to the e~st wlipre 125 connects to ntay Me~a, not MC1ntqomery In. Your divibions Mnntgomery, Southwest, western City purpose of this~ ThillQS listed under thp southwest are as dre snme of thinq-2) in We2)tenl City. 11. pdge FYF3 sh,'!ws tund number 6J.IlCJ SOL,thwest Area Tax a.l.lc1c'1t.ion bond $75,000 as goinrJ t~.Jwards stllrefront renovation project Al.ea-Is this confillerl. to E H Street as is implied? 12. The fi ve Y\~'rl.r fO:l::eca,st :;;eems to be very inadeYlli'itp-ly fUllrled make part no ot sense at all. What j.s thp the M,'fltgomery annexation 1 !..~ ~~ I:~.' X! \ f' '-ro.' ., "-= .......'."....... I k ^' . ~ "'"' u. "-. ',.......'^ ~~.. ,;~ '1 -~l:; ~,} ."', .~., . ,'" ?if ......~~j;- ,.,' =we-:>> CD= ~= = e:~ .,. -- ena CD a =- CD .. 6'~ ~~ ~ :l () 0 j~ -- .~ ~ ~ ~ c:I j " ,<,~ '~', , , :.~i ;~~J}:'< ,.. , , " ' : ~ " ' ;'.~! ~).': ?~ '>': > ,~~;' '~.';> " -. <~~~~~:: 7 :~.~: ~~~r.';:)'.: , ," ~!I:l~., :"}:l;.;1 .' \i:',...> 1 ~ ....' " ., ," d J'~ .,r :' 1"" '. '.~ci' ~ ", '-:) -;.,' <. " '". '~~~' A/ . 1"1,' J~~;' " "",, i;i;"." . ,,:'}.',1rf"1;'~ ..--.~ "," ~Jl,',:';l, :;;f.: .' ~ ' .:~' - . /;1.<- 'f. r. ,. ~~1 ,', ,'.J> ' i'{;:' ,1~~i: i~l,:o' ::' ,,,,' ,.:1': '" , "':~' ': 'i:1':\f.s' 1>';' . '~. , II i: , .' o ili ~ ~l: . , , .j':" """',," I>> ':::I!'>j~l" '. "'!~J).;;~: '''I' , Ii:':~i ,;i, >< " , ., 1~~~:!:: " , "' '~:' , ." ( " ., , " -. ., .., ~. CD ..1, '" -"'r- " " , F:~: '~':; " .~, L ., ,e, ~. ..,;, "'. .,.",::i::~ ",- '. ,:, V ... D) .. ~ '" ',.r", , . .', D3 .. :a CD -. :s fA .... .. D) '., r ': ~:' ri :.' , I' '" I , \I, ',-"", t' ,'" , , ' ; l' , \ " >", I " f ,~' I " "r I; " r , " T r: ll" " '. ~ tt'~ .' '" ' I:' /~ ~~ '~ ~ :\: t I~ t,: 1;:" "I ~ } i' _(,1,~,: '...... i i" ~f~i3., ~;~ ~' "- S:<v :: __ ~ ~~ . ~ l ~ ~r ~ . ',-;Jl,' ~':. " !;,'!'l.' ~. ".' > , ','" .';,:. ...~.f , .' ,,',>1' ~, : " :k.~:.il: 11 . f;'t ~\ ",.~..o_.......... " ^,' i iN' '~ !-,. , , , 1',"':' ,.' .- en .. .. -- ~ ft) o :s ft) . -.,."..~.,<;. ~ en .. ~ -- ~ m -zI ~ o m -- . 3> n l>> .. (D en :a: -. ,.... en :t: o 3 tD .. C ~ ~~ ;:J:J """'0 ;' ~ i" ,: .i ~~ :1 ~ :r fD ~ ~, HI ... ~ t . " .:i ~ , , - , " [ :E ~ IIl'DEl V .. . ~C -.....: ::s m ~B i:i nfD r>> 3 ; am en tD ... .o~ -h...~~ -'~I) .'N lIlI'iIiIl!I en \ n ~ I 1ft) In . ., iIi1I'J 'u} ; r:t A) ';1 , _."l '''. "~i~ " "6i'fj <l:""~" * {';"w'.. "1" ~~ :I..e)':'~".c"'? ". '; '~ ",I,.!,." JI1 '-"';.'", 'l':i;'::'rf~" 4",~"" ':,~... ~ '". ~, > I ..1,1 )',,"~ ,'" ~ . ":;:,;." '-C. .>. ',,:"".: ,"",,:' - '4 ..... .>: . . .'D!lil1iI .' '~,' l, . ~...'~; ::':'~j '~"--;": CD '.fD,,', ~ .~:..<,:::::.;\ ;m,;;:;::,~ ' .~ :':m",~::k:;;: '""w':; c" "?!"' '. "" ~ t'.~ ~i :14 ,.,1""'. ,"._..'....'" _ "1""1"11, 1:i'!',";"lki ~~':I'~lH '."" " I, ""h :'.: /,' .',',~, fi ~:. 1l"/nWi,',i" ' '~'l':\:, .' '!.H;i'{,,~>'y ." -'j' ,";:"!.iF/Jilr : ~.., ll<,(([f"""il.' 'I !li"~t.!'~~~fifi';'>1~1IW!I~<:'~<lfifmW"!~:"" "". ,,:" L.i,>~.r,..:",: :....:'. ~.,~ ~~_:~~,~;: ,"" ~;;:1:~;':! ..'. .It..... ' , id"i":RWt"llIJfl"!fP"JI:iietl 1 ,:",,} ,';;. ~.~... f"'!fI'rm!g.'::!;W, (:,.1l;l:1I1!1l#;,~",jlh:~1 I"~ " .:c; ~ \. ~t... lttWf!1t Hl1~J~.-l:U~' , I.::: . /~ ~ ::::= t '~{'~1f.t't' ~ ~,t;'l'F'" '. ""',;:".'" ~I.::~..\, ;_- 11 11":':I:.rIlJ"~ ~ . , [ -" ~.... ~..... I\, .'l'''''tld''!;J'' . " (~: 1; ;t ~ I \;; ~ .j~ .. i:,.~ ",,,,,,)"',,'I~.;gw"M'~.;. ,!~K!iili(. ',':" \~ :::;:. ~::::r r.t; "'..!~<m""'''''Il,'~ . . 'Ti~'", ,<> '-..... ~ "f ,'~'j'w ' . . U1l, ~':\':! l~~ .;;.;" j , ,,,", ""'. 'I,~ -:::::;;.-:: 1,'" - . :;"', .~;' 'f"i".' ";f<~.{':"i1,,,"{i..r.', ......, \..,,],.~~1,"'~' . ........!. ' _ i1lw tll,H- i!o I' ""I'~'''' ", .- - -. r.. ;<~h~, '..f" ,,:, " ~ '.'" , '!~ , . <<,' '11'::'''''-+ ~ : \iJii''''' , . :,\~~.::. , ,.,' .. ,t:"::t',",- ;,:- '. ..:J~'#r!'''~1f't~ ...." " ~ . ,~ , " /,j~ 'iiiiff!21:~;ir.~~~;:Jl~"< .~' :,., :',~~I/,'i<.b,''>~; ,.> ;., , ""I ., I; 'i~, 'I' " ", ,I:::' ":G':' ,l~' ':; "; ,(;'; P". ,.,,~.,J, -I j ~'~ . ,:- ,,~ ' 1-" r_ ',/ ;'~~l;~'J: h" "t J, ,\," ;" 'I ~;~~~'V:,~;.' . <~. ';,.t!:I', ',;. ." , , , .,;, , ~'~~~fJ~~;<c": "'::'~' ~. ~ " :. ') . ~ .;;.. 'L:, :: j" ~ :;'i;;~~~;U~":i:',)\~I":,,,::.;; i. ' ;~ ' '<'.,' . I!' ~ ~,"'4 ",'.'t ~' '!f -':':.' -I:', l'~' 'I' .< ..;, ";,' !,:i:::,i~;<';;';id ~:::I.: ';':?';,'JI!~,:;i~f;~:I.::"~;I~ ( ~~!:"l"'l.~"" f" ~' ,,!.. ~~, .!-: ,'~'!::'( ',: . ." .i' ',u'> r. ,".' ,/ ;';'.~ .~, . :~ .' , ~ ~. - I, 1:'. ~~ " , ... . 'J;> -' ,,' ~: . " ~, '.. '. I . ',. ~';t .. ': ~ ~ {'" ' >, t ;'-.';'..~.':., ;1', ~~,:, ::;',:~,~.~i. '>;"1 \'! ,> ';:';;~~~'I\~C ,: :<:~,"" . }~~'t1 r 1,. , ,1. ., ,I' '.. ' ; -' '. ., ,.;:,' ':~::- J:~.:~ ".' '<'i,'F I ' 'I ,',,'" ,::':~l;::r'.::):'1'k". Councilmember Steve Castaneda and South Bay Little League and Pony League thank BIA Cares for their generous contributions of time, talent and treasure for improvements at Reinstra Park. i;;t _- __ -Ii .,'_ CAR;E;~- ,~., 6~"~'~""-~~ ~;,Wm)n~~ \ ~',:"'e..'.., -;, . 'I: ,l..!.. I ,-;;.'-ltWNr'14{#" '''-~~.:::. .;,;,:" ~,,,...::?' ~