HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009/05/12 Item 9
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
~ CllYOF
~ (HULA VISTA
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
5/12/09, Iteml
PUBLIC HEARING ON CHULA VISTA'S PORTION OF THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING PART A OF THE JULY 2009 AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSNET LOCAL
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE SAN DIEGO
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR INCLUSION IN THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008/2009
THROUGH 2012/2013 AND PROVIDING CERTIFICATION AND INDEMNITY
STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN TRANSNET FUNDS)
B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING PART B OF THE JULY 2009 AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSNET LOCAL
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE SAN DIEGO
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR INCLUSION IN THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008/2009
THROUGH 2012/2013 AND PROVIDING CERTIFICATION AND INDEMNITY
STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN TRANSNET FUNDS
C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COlJNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING PART C OF THE JULY 2009 AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSNET LOCAL
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE SAN DIEGO
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR INCLUSION IN THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008/2009
THROUGH 2012/2013 AND PROVIDING CERTIFICATION AND INDEMNITY
STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN TRANSNET FUNDS
D. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING PART D OF THE JULY 2009 AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSNET LOCAL
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE SAN DIEGO
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR INCLUSION IN THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008/2009
THROUGH 2012/2013 AND PROVIDING CERTIFICATION AND INDEMNITY
STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN TRANSNET FUNDS
E. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING PART E OF THE JULY 2009 AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSNET LOCAL
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE SAN DIEGO
ASSOCIATON OF GOVER.J'lMENTS FOR INCLUSION IN THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008/2009
THROUGH 2012/2013 AND PROVIDING CERTIFICATION AND INDEMNITY
STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO O~T !RANSNET FUNDS
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS .
CITY MANAGER
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 4/5THS VOTE: YES 0 NO 181
9-1
5/12/09, Itern C1
Page 2 of 8
SUMMARY
The San Diego Association of Governments (SAl"lDAG) has notified the local agencies that
requests for the July 2009 amendment to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
(RTIP) may be submitted beginning April 20, 2009. Signed resolutions must be submitted to
SANDAG by June 5, 2009. The City will need to submit a request for amendment in order to
add funding for projects that are included in the City's Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal
Year 2009-10. .
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed actIVIty, consIstmg of
approval to submit a funding request for various Transnet Projects to SANDAG, for compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is
not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 (b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore,
pursuant to Section 15060 (c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to
CEQA. Although environmental review is not necessary at this time, once the scope of the
individual projects to be funded have been defined, environmental review will be required for
each project and the appropriate environmental determination will be made.
RECOMMENDA nON
Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the resolutions.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
Transnet Historv and Reeulations
The voters of San Diego County approved the Transnet Program as Proposition A in November
1987. This proposition enacted a half-cent increase in the countywide sales tax through 2008 to
fund specified transportation programs and projects. The intent of Proposition A is to
supplement the local funds currently being spent on transit and streets and roads, therefore the
Plan includes a maintenance of effort requirement for each agency. Under this maintenance of
effort requirement, each local agency receiving revenues must annually maintain, as a minimum,
the same level of local discretionary funding expended for streets and roads purposes as was
reported in the State Controller's Annual Report of Financial Transactions for Streets and Roads
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1985. One third of the revenues generated by the tax are
allocated by SANDAG to the local agencies for local streets and roads purposes. These funds
have been distributed to cities annually and programmed by cities into local projects.
In November 2004, 67 percent of County voters supported Proposition A, which extends
Transnet from 2008 to 2048. It was estimated that the Transnet extension would generate
approximately $14 billion per year to be distributed among highways, transit, and local road
projects. An estimated $4.48 billion will be allocated to local programs, with $3.950 billion
distributed to local agencies based on population and maintained miles of roadway. The Transnet
Extension Ordinance states that at least 70 percent of the funds allocated to local agencies for
local road projects should be used to fund construction of new or expanded facilities, major
rehabilitation and reconstruction of roadways, traffic signalization, transportation infrastructure
9-2
5/12/09, Iteml
Page 3 of 8
to support smart growth, capital improvements for transit facilities, and operating support for
local shuttle and circulator transit routes. No more than 30 percent of Transnet funds allocated to
local agencies for local road projects are expected to be used for local street and road
maintenance. However, local agencies may deviate from the 70-30 "rule" if they are able to
provide sufficient justification to obtain concurrence from SANDAG. This requirement is a
significant change from the way original Transnet funding could be used and requires more
stringent implementation and monitoring strategies.
The SANDAG Board has subsequently adopted guidelines implementing this policy (Attachment
1). The Maintenance and Non-Congestion Relief category (limited to 30 percent of funding)
includes maintenance activities such as pothole repair, seals, traffic signal and lamp replacement,
roadway signing and striping and overlays less than one-inch thick. The Congestion Relief
category (at least 70 percent of funding) includes pavement reconstruction as well as overlays
one-inch thick or greater, grinding and overlay, new sidewalks and roadway drainage
improvements for the purpose of reducing significant roadway flooding. This category also
includes various traffic operations improvements, such as traffic signal coordination and
interconnection, traffic signal upgrades, video surveillance and data collection for performance
monitoring purposes. Certain improvements, such as traffic calming measures, pedestrian
ramps, street buffer areas (such as landscaped strips), bus stop enhancements and pedestrian
traffic signals, are included in the 70 percent category only if they are in Smart Growth areas.
SANDAG has identified 15 existing or potential Smart Growth areas within Chula Vista,
including several areas within Otay Ranch, as well as the Bayfront, the H Street corridor,
Palomar Gateway, Southwestern College and Third Avenue downtown.
Agencies are required to provide specific descriptions, locations and limits for all projects within
the Congestion Relief Category. With respect to pedestrian and bicycle facilities, SANDAG
cites Section 4(E)(3) of the Transnet Ordinance, which states, "All new projects, or major
reconstruction projects, funded by revenues provided under this Ordinance shall accommodate
travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, except where pedestrians and bicyclists are prohibited by
law from using a given facility or where the cost of including bikeways and walkways would be
excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use." This was further elaborated on in
Rule 20 of SANDAG Board Policy 31, "Accommodation of Bicyclists and Pedestrians",
adopted by the SANDAG Board of Directors on February 22, 2008 (Attachment 2). This rule
states that evaluating bicycle and pedestrian accommodation is required for all major
reconstruction projects included under Congestion Relief under the 70-30 requirement. The
decision not to provide for pedestrian and bicycle facilities in a construction or major
reconstruction project must be made for good cause, such as severe topographic or biologic
constraints. It further states that cities may use a bicycle or pedestrian master plan adopted by
the city council and approved by SANDAG within the last five years to determine the
appropriate means of accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians in a given project. Since Chula
Vista's Bikeway Master Plan was adopted in January 2005, it qualifies under this provision.
A table is included which discusses the level of pedestrian and bicycle accommodation required
for various types of streets and transit facilities. However, new projects or major reconstruction
projects may not need to include the expected bikeway facility when a suitable route with the
appropriate accommodations exists within V.-mile. Agencies are also not required to acquire
additional right-of-way to improve pedestrian and bicycle access. Sidewalks are not required to
be provided for overlay projects where there are no curb, gutter and drainage facilities and may
9-3
5/12/09, Iteml
Page 4 of 8
also be excluded where there are no uses (including bus stops) that would create a need for
pedestrian access.
Agencies were required to submit their proposed projects for inclusion in the 2008 Regional
Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) by April 23, 2008. The RTIP covered five fiscal
years between Fiscal Year 2008-09 through Fiscal Year 2012-13. Council adopted Resolution
2008-110 on April 22, 2008, which approved the submittal of the City's portion of the Transnet
Local Street Improvement Program to SANDAG (Attachment 3). The 2008 RTIP was adopted
by the SANDAG Board on July 25, 2008 with submittal to the State on August 1, 2008. The
next biannual RTIP will be prepared and submitted in 2010. However, at their option, agencies
can submit amendments to the RTIP on a quarterly basis.
The City has submitted one previous amendment to the 2008 RTIP. On February 17, 2009, the
President ofthe United States signed HRl, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. This
bill included approximately $27.5 billion for highways. Due to the limited turn around time,
SANDAG informed the local agencies that their projects should be limited to paving, traffic
signal and street improvement projects on Federal Aid Highways (most major streets). On
March 3, 2009, Council adopted Resolution 2009-042 (Attachment 4), which approved an
amendment to the 2008 RTIP which would allow the City to swap existing funding for Federal
funding on the following projects:
. TF330: Traffic Signal Modification - Fourth Ave.! Main St.,
Fourth Ave.! Beyer Blvd.: $450,000
. TF331: Traffic Signal Modification - Third Ave.! Montgomery St.: $300,000
. STL335: Major Pavement Rehabilitation: $10,010,000
On March 27, 2009 the SANDAG Board of Directors met to decide on the method of
distribution for the San Diego region's economic stimulus highway funds. SANDAG offered to
swap Federal funds for Transnet funds. The City was subsequently informed that $3,360,000
would be the City's share of these funds. Out of this total, City staff therefore submitted
$750,000 for the above traffic signal projects and $2,610,000 for pavement rehabilitation for
inclusion in Amendment 12. An expanded list of Federal Aid-eligible streets were submitted for
recommended overlays/ rehabilitation.
Proposed Amendment to 2008 RTIP
The proposed amendments to Chula Vista's portion of the 2008 RTIP are shown on the table,
"Transnet Allocations 2009-10" (Attachment 5). These additions are in accordance with the
Fiscal Year 2009-10 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for next fiscal year only. Although the
amounts shown under RTIP Amendment 12 have already been submitted to SANDAG as part of
the ARRA swap, they are included here because they are part of the FY2009-10 CIP. (Note that
an additional $20,000 above the ARRA swap amount was included under Traffic Signal and
Streetlight Modifications in Amendment 12.) Both the CIP numbers and the SANDAG project
numbers (MPO ill) are included.
Several projects are listed under "Old Transnet (Cash)" This pertains to funds that the City
currently has on hand, either for currently unused allocations to projects through Fiscal Year
2007 -08 (particularly STL335) or unallocated interest on such funds. The other two categories
pertain to new Transnet revenues that are anticipated to be allocated to the City during Fiscal
9-4
5/12/09, Item~
Page 5 of 8
Year 2009-10. Based on SANDAG's February 2009 estimate, it is estimated that Chula Vista's
share of Transnet revenues will be $4,451,000. Therefore, based on the 70-30 split, it is
estimated that $3,120,000 will be available for Congestion Relief projects and $1,331,000 for
Maintenance projects.
The following new projects are proposed to be added to the 2008 RTIP:
1. Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements: Transnet funding is proposed to be added to
several projects that will add street improvements within the Castle Park area through the
formation of Assessment Districts and a Section 108 loan. These projects are all part of
the Western Chula Vista Infrastmcture Financing Program. The following streets will be
included:
a. First Avenue, Palomar Street to Naples Street (STL303): $20,000
b. Glenhaven Way to Amy Street (STU04): $10,000
c. Oxford Street from Third Ave. to Alpine Ave. (STU05): $15,000
d. Second Ave. from Naples St. to Palomar St. (STU42): $25,000
2. Industrial Blvd. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities: Transnet has been proposed as the
matching funds for two bicycle/ pedestrian grant applications for Industrial Blvd. One
project will provide bike lanes on both sides and curb, gutter and sidewalk on the east
side of Industrial Blvd. from Naples Street to Palomar Street (STL361). SANDAG
recommends that the City receive a Smart Growth grant for constmction ofthe pedestrian
facilities; the Transnet funding will provide a match of $145,300 for constmction of the
bike lanes. The second project involves constmction of bike lanes on Industrial Blvd.
from L St. to Palomar St. (STL360). If the City receives a Bicycle Transportation
Account (BT A) grant for this project, it will cover most of the cost of the bicycle
facilities in STL361, and the City will only need to provide a total Transnet match of
$35,355 for both projects.
3. Bikeway Master Plan Update (STL351): In order to be eligible for certain grant
funding for the constmction of bicycle facilities, the city must update its Bikeway Master
Plan every five years. Since the Bikeway Master Plan was adopted by Council and
approved by Council in January 2005, it is time to prepare an update. The City
anticipates receiving $150,000 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds to pay
for the report, as discussed in the Council report for April 28, 2009. The $50,000 in
Transnet funds will pay for any additional costs, including staff costs.
4. South Broadway Improvements, Main Street to Citv Line (STM367): This is a new
project, which will involve overlay/ reconstmction of Broadway, construction of curb,
gutter and sidewalk, and installation of bike lanes. The City will need $500,000 in
Transnet funds to begin planning, design and environmental review of this project.
5. Naples St. and Oleander Ave. Cross Gutter (STL359): This is a major signalized
intersection that has a cross gutter with steep slopes on each side, which creates a
roadway "dip", thus reducing the roadway design speed. The purpose of this project is to
reduce the slopes, thereby increasing vehicle safety and reducing congestion at this
intersection. This project is therefore classified as "Congestion Relief'.
9-5
5/12/09, Item~
Page 6 of8
6. Emergencv Storm Drain Replacement (DR180): During February through March
2009, corrugated metal pipe (CMP) storm drain failures were discovered at the following
locations:
. 882 Helix Avenue
. 106 EI Capitan Drive
. 1188 Neptune Court
There is also a location at 1526 Grand Teton Court that has a 7-foot by 7-foot by 10-foot
deep sinkhole where concrete storm drain pipe had become displaced. These locations
have already been reported to Council in informational items dated February 23 and April
21, 2009. Immediate storm drain replacement in these locations has been undertaken in
order to protect life and property.
An additional location with failed concrete storm drain pipe has been recently identified
in the Poggi Canyon Channel at Rancho Road. Although it does not present an
immediate danger, it needs to be repaired prior to the next storm season.
The estimated cost for the five high priority locations is $1,200,000. SANDAG staff has
stated that we can use Transnet funds for the purpose of making these repairs/
replacement.
Additionally, the following are the major ongoing projects that are proposed to receive additional
funding through this amendment:
1. North Broadwav Basin Reconstruction (STM354): This project was included in
last year's ClP with a $2,178,000 anticipated Federal grant. Since this grant was never
received, it is proposed that it be replaced by $2,200,000 in existing Transnet funds
previously allocated to STL335. The project includes street reconstruction and
construction of drainage facilities on Broadway from D Street to approximately 200 feet
north of C Street.
2. Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safetv: These projects relate to two ongoing City
programs: School Zone Traffic Calming (CHV33) and Neighborhood Traffic and
Pedestrian Safety (CHV34). Since they did not receive any funding from SANDAG in
Fiscal Year 2008-09, they were closed by SANDAG. Proposed Transnet funding and
CIP projects include the following:
a. Traffic Calming (STL345): $130,000
b. Safe Routes to School, Otay and Rice Elementary Schools (TF361): $97,000
c. Kids Walk and Bike to School (TF362): $100,000
d. Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety (TF327): $220,000
3. Pavement Minor Rehabilitation (STL355): Based on the 70-30 split, the Pavement
Rehabilitation Program is being split into two parts. This portion includes $450,000
available from the maintenance portion of Transnet.
4. Pavement Maior Rehabilitation (STL354): This includes the portion of the Pavement
Rehabilitation Program that includes overlays (one-inch and greater) and reconstruction.
Compliance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) is required. The available
9-6
5/12/09, Item~
Page 7 of 8
amount for Fiscal Year 2008-09 is $2,020,000. The City is required to provide the
locations of the street segments included in this program. Since the exact number of
locations in this program will not be certain until the award of the contract, staff has
provided SANDAG with a list of the maximum number of locations that may be included
as part of RTIP Amendment 12. The streets have been selected in accordance with the
priorities established in the City's Pavement Management System for overlays and are
included as Attachment 6. The only modification from the previous list is that F Street
has been changed from "Broadway to Hilltop Drive" to "Broadway to First Ave.". Due
to the need for new/ replacement curb and driveway approaches, it was determined that it
would be more cost effective to construct the missing sidewalk on the south side of the
street from First Ave. to Hilltop Drive as a separate future project, maybe as an
assessment district, that would also include construction of missing improvements on
Hilltop Drive.
5. I-80S and Olvmpic Parkway Interchange (STM328)
The interchange project was awarded by Council on April 27, 2004. The scope of this
project was to widen the existing bridge deck over I-80S and East Orange Ave.! Olympic
Parkway. In addition, all four on/off ramps were to be widened as well as local street
widening from Melrose Avenue, west of I-80S, to just east of Oleander Avenue. Work
on the freeway also added auxiliary lanes, soundwalls and revised landscaping.
As part of this project, only the southbound off-ramp at Main Street was on the
construction plans. Due to impending redevelopment! development of the Crossing
Shopping Center and several auto dealerships, staff was able to obtain approval from
Caltrans, FHW A and SANDAG for widening the westbound approach to the northbound
on-ramp, the northbound and southbound on-ramps and restriping and signal
modifications as part of a construction change order. The work is complete and the
project has been closed out. SANDAG is requesting this action in order to close out final
accounting for the Transnet fund. No additional funds are needed, it is only for
accounting purposes.
Staff has evaluated all the projects for compliance with the bicycle and pedestrian regulations.
The findings for the pavement projects are shown on Attachment 6. Projects which were not
included on the original 2008 RTIP list are shown in bold; the other projects were evaluated last
year. The segments on south Broadway from Main St. to Anita St. and Main St. to Faivre St. do
not have existing bike facilities, and the segment from Main St. to Faivre St. does not have curb,
gutter and sidewalk (which is required for a reconstruction, although not for an overlay).
However, since these facilities are planned to be included in the project, no exclusion is
requested.
The other potential issue pertains to Main St. from D Street to F Street. As with the portion of
Broadway from C Street to D Street, which was discussed with last year's agenda statement,
there are no bike facilities. Parallel bikeways are located within v,,-mile. No bicycle facility is
recommended in the City's approved Bikeway Master Plan, due to the high traffic volumes.
Since the decision to provide no additional bicycle facilities is in compliance with the Bikeway
Master Plan, no exemption is required.
5/12/09, Iteml
Page 8 of 8
The Transnet Extension Ordinance also requires that the City exact from the private sector a
minimum of $2000 per new residential unit (EDU), effective July 1,2008, with annual escalation
based on the ENR (or similar) Construction Cost Index. These exactions are to pay for the
proportional share of funding to improve the Regional Arterial System. Low to moderate
income housing units are exempt. The City's Transportation Development Impact Fee has been
in place for many years for the area of the City east of 1-805. On March 18, 2008 Council
enacted the Western Chula Vista Transportation Development Impact Fee (WTDIF) at the rate of
$3243 per EDU. The City is in compliance with these requirements. The WTDIF began to be
collected as of May 19, 2008.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found that conflicts exist in
that Mayor Cox (TF344), Councilmember Castaneda (STL354), Councilmember McCann
(STL354, STM328), and Councilmember Ramirez (TF3601, TF360, STL354) have property
holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the projects which are the subject of this action.
These Councilmembers will only vote on the resolution that exclude conflicting projects.
CURRENT FISCAL IMPACT
There will be no impact to the General Fund.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ATTACHMENTS
I. Transnet Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Implementation Guidelines
2. Rule 21 ofSANDAG Board Policy No. 31
3. Resolution 2008-110 and Transnet Allocation Table
4. Resolution 2009-42
5. Transnet Allocations - FY2009-1 0
6. Recommended Overlays/ Reconstructs
Prepared by: Elizabeth Chopp. Senior Civil Engineer. Engineering Dept.
M:\Engineer\AGENDA \CAS2009\OS-12-09\RTIP 2009-13 Amendment final.doc
9-8
ATTACHMENT )
TransNet Local Street and Road Program
TransNet Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Implementation Guidelines
June 23, 2006
The TransNet Ordinance requires that at least 70 percent of the revenues provided for local street
and road purposes should be used to fund direct expenditures for facilities contributing to
congestion relief. No more than 30 percent of these funds should be used for local street and road
maintenance purposes. The required multi-year Regional Transportation Improvement Program
(RTIP) project lists submitted by local agencies that are found to be out of compliance with this
requirement will not be approved. Local agencies may request an exception to this requirement and
must provide justification for such a request as part of its project list submittal.
The following table categorizes and lists the more typical types of facilities that are considered to
contribute to congestion relief. For other facilities not listed, it must be demonstrated that
congestion relief can be obtained before the project can be considered part of the 70 percent
Congestion Relief category. Maintenance costs of items listed in the 70 percent Congestion Relief
category are eligible under the 30 percent category. Facilities that are not considered to contribute
to congestion relief (Items 28-30) are eligible under the 30 percent category.
Congestion Relief
.; (At I.east 70%)
Maintenance and Non-Congestion Relief
. . (No more. than 30%) ,
New or Expanded Facilities
1. New roadways and bridges
2. Roadway and bridge widening
3. Roadway widening for bike lanes
Major Rehabilitation and Reconstruction
4. Roadway rehabilitation (grinding and overlay. or
new structural pavement, or new overlay 1-inch
thick or greater)
5. Roadway realignment
6. Bridge retrofit or replacement
7. Roadway drainage improvements for the purpose
of improving capacity-impeding conditions such as
significant and frequent roadway flooding
8. New sidewalk or sidewalk widening
Traffic Operations
9. Median installation for safety improvement or left.
turn movement
10. New traffic signal. passive permissive left turn
(PPLT) installation. signal removal for congestion
relief reasons, traffic signal upgrades. intersection
lighting
11. Traffic signal coordination
12. Traffic signal interconnection
3
9-9
. Lane removal for bike lanes
. Pavement overlay (less than 1 inch)
. Pot hole repair, chip seal, fog seal. crack
seal (except when part of roadway
rehabilitation project)
. Roadway realignment that does not
increase roadway capacity
. Bridge replacement for aesthetic purposes
. Minor drainage improvements not part of a
congestion rei ief project
. Stand alone landscaping project of an
existing median
. Traffic signal replacement, bulb
replacement. hardware, software, inductive
loop repair
Maintenance and Non-Congestion Relief,
(No more than 30%)
.. .
CongestlonRelief
(At least 70%)
13. Centrally controlled traffic signal optimization
syste m
14. Traffic surveillance or detection system (video)
15. Traffic data collection system for performance
monitoring purposes (in pavement detection,
radar)
Smart Growth-Related Infrastructure'
16. Traffic calming measures
17. Pedestrian ramps
18. Pedestrian traffic signal activation
19. Pedestrian crossings/overcrossings
20. Buffer area between sidewalk and street
21. Pedestrian roadway lighting
Light bulb replacement
Transit Facilities
22. New bus stops
23. Bus stop enhancements
24. Bus-only lanes
.
Bus-only lanes that do not provide
congestion relief
25. Queuejumper lanes for buses
26. Traffic signal priority measures for buses
27. Transit operational costs for shuttle and circulator
routes
Non-Congestion Relief
28. Erosion control (unless required as part of
a congestion relief project)
29. Landscaping (unless required as part of a
congestion relief project)
30. Roadway signing and delineation (unless it
is a congestion rei ief project)
Note: Staff costs for congestion relief project development (environmental, preliminary
engineering, design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction management) are eligible
expenditures under the 70 percent category. Staff costs for transportation infrastructure
maintenance or traffic operations efforts are eligible under the 30 percent category. Costs for
general TransNet fund administration and transportation planning are eligible up to 1 percent of
annual revenues.
* To receive credit for providing congestion relief under the 70 percent category, smart growth-related infrastructure must
be provided in one of the existing or planned (riot potential) seven Regional Comprehensive Plan smart growth land use
type characteristic areas: Metropolitan Center, Urban Center, Town Center, Community Center, Transit Corridor, Special
Use Center. or Rural Community. Smart growth-related infrastructure built outside of one of the seven types of
characteristic areas is eligible under the 30 percent category.
4
9-10
ATTACHMENT ';&-
Committee shall be established to select the ITOC members from the list of
qualified candidates recommended by the technical screening committee. The
Selection Committee is to consist of two members of the County of San Diego
Board of Supervisors; the Mayor of the City of San Diego; and a mayor from each
of the four subregions. It is the mayors from each of the subregions that are to
select from among themselves to sit on the Selection Committee, not the
representatives who sit on the Board who may or may not be a mayor. The
members of the Selection Committee who are mayors from the subregions shall
serve for a period of two years or until the designee no longer holds the office of
mayor. At the end of this term, the mayors from the affected subregion(s) shall
either inform the Clerk of the SANDAG Board that the same representative is being
redesignated or identify the new mayor who they have selected to represent their
subregion on the Selection Committee.
Rule #21: Accommodation of Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Adoption Date:
February 22, 2008
Text:
Adequate provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel is determined within the
context of the roadway type, its existing and planned surrounding land uses,
existing bicycle and pedestrian plans, and current or planned public transit service.
When addressing the access needs dictated by land use, the responsible agency
must consider demand created by current and expected land uses (as determined
by the local general plan) within the useful life of the TransNet project. The table
Appropriate Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Measures provides a guide to
appropriate accommodation measures for each transportation facility type and
land use context. In the table, "urban" means within the urbanized area as defined
by U.S. Census Bureau.
Appropriate Bicvcle and Pedestrian Accommodation Measures 1
Context/Facility Type Bicycle Measures Pedestrian Measures
Urban Highway 0 Required facility type will be 0 Continuous sidewalks and
based on the recommendations marked crosswalks through
for any regional bikeway freeway i ntercha nges
corridors in urban highway where sidewalks exist or
alignments developed through are planned on the
the 2007 Regional Bicycle Plan. intersecting roadway.
Pending completion of this plan, 0 Where new freeway
appropriate bicycle construction severs existing
accommodation will be pedestrian access, grade
developed on a project by project separated pedestrian
basis by local and regional crossings with no more
authorities in consultation with than 0.3 mile between
appropriate stakeholders. crossings.
0 Freeways and freeway
interchanges may not eliminate
existing bikeways or preclude
planned bikeways on local streets
and roads.
11
9-11
Appropriate Bicvcle and Pedestrian Accommodation Measures 1
Context/Facility Type Bicycle Measures Pedestrian Measures
Transit Project . Bicycle lockers and racks at . Direct sidewalk connections
stations sufficient to meet normal between station platforms
expected demand and adjacent roadway
. Bicycle access to all transit sidewalks
vehicles except those providing . Pedestrian crossings where
exclusive paratransit service to a new transit way severs
the disabled as required by the existing pedestrian
Americans with Disabilities Act. access with no more than
. Transit priority measures on 0.3 miles between
roadways may not prevent bicycle crossi ngs.
access.
Major Urban Street . Class 2 bike lanes. . Continuous sidewalks or
pathways2, both sides of
the street with marked
crosswalks at traffic
controlled intersections.
. ADA compliant bus stop
landings for existing and
planned transit service
Urban Collector Street . Class 2 bike lanes . Continuous sidewalks or
(design speed >35 mph) pathways2, both sides of
the street with marked
crosswa I ks at traffic
controlled intersections.
. ADA compliant bus stop
landings for existi ng and
planned transit service
Urban Collector Street . Shared roadway. Where planned . Continuous sidewalks or
(design speed :S 35 mph) average daily motor vehicle pathways2 both sides of the
traffic exceeds 6,500, the outside street
travel lane should be at least 14 . ADA compliant bus stop
feet wide. landings for existing and
planned transit service
Urban Loca I Street . Shared roadway . Continuous sidewalks or
pathways2 both sides of the
street
. ADA compliant bus stop
landings for existing and
planned transit service
Rural Highway . Minimum 8-foot paved shoulder . ADA compliant bus stop
landings for existing bus
stops.
12
9-12
Appropriate Bicvcle and Pedestrian Accommodation Measures 1
Context/Facility Type Bicycle Measures Pedestrian Measures
Rural Collector Road . Minimum 8-foot paved shoulder . Not required with no
fronting uses
. Paved or graded walkway
consistent with community
character on streets with
fronting uses.
. ADA compliant bus stop
landings for existing bus
stops.
Rural Local Road . Minimum 6-foot paved shoulder . Not required with 85th
percentile speeds :s 25 mph
. Paved or graded walkway
consistent with community
character on streets with
fronting uses and 85th
percentile speeds> 25 mph.
. ADA compliant bus stop
landings for existing bus
stops.
1. Application of these accommodation measures is subject to sound planning and engineering
judgment to ensure the facility is reasonable and appropriate within the land use and
transportation context of the overall project.
2. Unpaved pathways of decomposed granite or other suitable material that are set back from
the roadway where feasible would be considered appropriate only on roads serving areas
that are rural in nature.
Where a local jurisdiction has a bicycle or pedestrian master plan adopted by the city councilor
Board of Supervisors and approved by SANDAG. the local agency may use that plan to determine
the appropriate means of accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians in a given project and at a
minimum provide the facilities called for in the plan. These plans must be updated and approved no
less than every five years to qualify as a means of satisfying this provision.
Best Available Standards. All bicycle facilities must be designed to the standards established in
the California Highway Design Manual, Chapter 1000. Bicycle parking facilities should conform to
the guidelines established in the Regional Bicycle Plan adopted by SANDAG. Shared roadways on
collector streets should have a curb lane or curb lane plus shoulder that measures at least 14 feet.
Where parallel parking is in place, consideration should be given to installing the shared lane
pavement marker. All sidewalks must be designed consistent with the design standards established
in the AASHTO Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities, the
Department of State Architect's California Access Compliance Reference Manual, and the U.S.
Department of Transportations ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG).
Consistency with the design recommendations in SANDAG's Planning and Designing for Pedestrians
is encouraged
Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation in Reconstruction Projects. Street and road
reconstruction is the time to re-evaluate the function of a road and its context, and to reallocate
13
9-13
the right-of-way if appropriate to meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. An agency is not
required to acquire additional right of way to improve bicycle and pedestrian access. However. the
agency should consider reduced motor vehicle lanes and lane widths, and reduced median widths as
a means of providing the appropriate bicycle or pedestrian facility. While such an evaluation is
recommended for reconstruction projects of any size. compliance with these guidelines is required
for "major" reconstruction projects meeting the definitions established under Rule 18 of SANDAG
Board Policy No. 031 regarding the guidelines for implementing the "70/30" requirement.
When Provisions for Bicyclists and Pedestrians Accommodation May Be Excluded.
Section 4(E)(3) is based on the premise that pedestrians and bicyclists need safe and convenient
access to the same destinations as other users of the public right of way. Consequently, those
portions of the transportation network where pedestrians and bicyclists need not be
accommodated are the exception. and the decision not to provide for them in a construction or
major reconstruction project must be made by the responsible agency for good cause such as severe
topographic or biological constraints. Any impacts on the roadway's motor vehicle capacity that
result from providing for pedestrian and bicycle access would not, in themselves, justify excluding
bicycle and pedestrian facilities. However, these impacts and their mitigation costs should be
considered in determining if the cost of providing the facilities is disproportionate to the probable
use.
This provision only requires an agency to provide appropriate bicycle or pedestrian facilities that are
within the construction or reconstruction area of the project. Consideration of the provision of
sidewalks as part of major rehabilitation roadway projects involving only new pavement overlays of
1-inch thickness or greater (see Rule 18 under Board Policy 031) on streets where sidewalks do not
currently exist would only be required if curb. gutter, and related drainage facilities were already in
place.
The cost of providing for bicycle and pedestrian access can vary significantly relative to the overall
project cost. For this reason, specifying a proportional or absolute limit on spending for bicycle or
pedestrian improvements relative to probable use would not allow the kind of discretion necessary
to make a significant investment in facilities when necessary, or to withhold an investment when
the benefits are marginal. Therefore, the decision to exclude accommodations for bicyclist and
pedestrians must be a policy-level decision made by the Board or city council based on the body of
information about context, cost, and probable use available at the time. Such a decision must be
made in the public hearing required by Section 5(A) of the Ordinance.
Pedestrian Access. Sidewalks or other walkways may be excluded from a project when it can be
demonstrated that there are no uses (including bus stops) that would create demand for pedestrian
access. In making this determination. the agency must consider the potential for future demand
within the useful life of the project. Access to and from public transit. including crossing
improvements. also must be considered and accommodated where there is existing or planned
transit service.
Bicycle Access. A new project or major reconstruction project may not include the expected bikeway
treatment when a suitable parallel route with the appropriate accommodations exists that would
require no more than l4-mile total out of direction travel.
Procedures for Excluding Accommodations for Pedestrians and Bicyclists from Projects.
When an agency determines not to include bicycle or pedestrian accommodations in a project
because the cost of doing so would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use, the
agency must include a notice of that decision in the notice of the public hearing required by
14
9-14
Sections 5(A) and Section 6 of the Ordinance, In submitting the project to SANDAG for inclusion in
the TransNet Program of Projects as part of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
(RTIP) process, the agency must notify SANDAG that bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities, as described
in Table 1 or in its bicycle or pedestrian master plan, will not be included in the project along with
written justification for that decision, The decision and justification is subject to review and
comment by SANDAG through the Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group, which would forward its
comments to the SANDAG Transportation Committee, The Independent Taxpayer Oversight
Committee also would review and comment on such projects as part of its role in the RTIP process,
The Transportation Committee in approving the TransNet Program of Projects must make a finding
that the local decision not to provide bicycle or pedestrian facilities is consistent with the provisions
of this Ordinance prior to approving the project for funding under the TransNet Program, If this
consistency finding is not made, the agency would have the opportunity to revise its fund
programming request for consideration in a future RTIP amendment,
Effective Implementation. This rule will be effective for projects added to the TransNet Program
of Projects subsequent to their adoption by the SANDAG Board of Directors, Within three years of
their adoption, the rule will be re-evaluated by SANDAG to ensure they are effectively encouraging
provision of a balance transportation network without imposing an excessive cost burden on
projects funded under the program,
Rule #22: TransNet Extension Ordinance Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base level,
implementation guidelines
Adoption Date:
March 2S, 200S
Text:
Section S of the Extension Ordinance provides guidelines regarding the MOE base
level calculation and implementation,
Section S of the Extension Ordinance states the intended purpose of the MOE
requirement is to ensure that revenues provided from TransNet be used to
augment. not supplant. existing local revenue. Some flexibility in accounting for
spikes in expenditures would be consistent with the intent of ensuring that the
local agencies do not supplant local funds with TransNet funds, Therefore, one-
time expenditures that were a result of "banking" general fund monies and
subsequently expending those funds during the base period Fiscal Years 2001 _
2003 may be isolated and removed so that the MOE is representative of a normal
annual spending level, subject to review by the iTOC and approval by the Board of
Directors,
In addition, the language in Section S of the Extension Ordinance states the MOE
will be determined on the basis of "discretionary funds expended for street and
road purposes" ,as was reported in the State Controller's Annual Report of
Financial Transactions for Streets and Roads," The Extension Ordinance also states
"the MOE also shall apply to any local agency discretionary funds being used for
the other purposes specified under Section 4," Based on this language, the MOE
levels are to be established separately for each category in Section 4 of the
Ordinance: major highway and transit congestion relief projects; transit programs
to support seniors and disabled persons; specialized transportation services for
seniors; monthly transit passes for seniors, disabled, and youth riders; transit
operations; local streets and roads; habitat-related mitigation costs of local
transportation projects; and the smart growth incentive program, The annual
15
9-15
ATTACHMENT -3
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-110
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF CERTAIN
PROJECTS FOR THE TRANSNET LOCAL STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TO THE SAN DIEGO
ASSOCLATON OF GOVERNMENTS FOR INCLUSION IN
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008/2009 THROUGH
2012/2013
WHEREAS, on November 3, 1987, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2004, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego County Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (04-01)
extension (Extension Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, the Ordinance and the Extension Ordinance provide that the San Diego
Association of Governments (SANDAG), acting as the Regional Transportation Commission,
shall approve a multi-year program of projects submitted by local jurisdictions identifying those
transportation projects eligible to use transportation sales tax (TRANSNET) funds; and
WHEREAS, every two years, SANDAG updates the Regional Transportation
Improvement Plan (RTIP) and releases new funding projections for the cities within San Diego
County; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2008, pursuant to Ordinances No.3 I 06 through No. 31 10, the
City Council adopted the Western Chula Vista Transportation Development Fee (WTDIF) at a
rate of $3,243 per Equivalent Development Unit; and
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2005, pursuant to Resolution No. 2005-014, the City Council
adopted the City's Bikeway Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, in January 2008, SANDAG staff acknowledged this Plan as complete,
consistent with the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan, and coordinated with other jurisdictions;
and
WHEREAS, Section 4.E.3 of the Extension Ordinance states that all new projects, or
major reconstruction projects, funded by revenues provided under this Ordinance shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, except where pedestrians and bicyclists are
prohibited by law from using a given facility or where the costs of including bikeways and
walk"".ays would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use; and
9-16
Resolution No. 2008-110
Page 2
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2008, the SANDAG Executive Committee considered a
proposed amendment to SANDAG Board Policy 31 to establish guidelines for the
implementation of Section 4.E.3 of the Extension Ordinance (Rule 20 Amendment); and
WHEREAS, staff believes that the Rule 20 Amendment was adopted by the SANDAG
Board based on conversations with SANDAG staff; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 20 Amendment states that a local jurisdiction may use a bicycle or
pedestrian master plan adopted by the city council and approved by SANDAG to determine the
appropriate means of accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians in a given project and at a
minimum provide the facilities called for in the plan; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 20 Amendment also lists the circumstances when provisions for
bicyclists and pedestrians may be excluded; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 20 Amendment states that a new project or major reconstruction
project may not include the expected bikeway treatment when a suitable parallel route with the
appropriate accommodations exists that would require no more than v..-mile total out of direction
travel; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 20 Amendment states that sidewalks or other walkways may be
excluded from a project when it can be demonstrated that there are no uses (including bus stops)
that would create demand for pedestrian access and that in making this determination, the agency
must consider the potential for future demand within the useful life of the project; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 20 Amendment'states that an agency is not required to acquire
additional right-of-way to improve bicycle and pedestrian access; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 20 Amendment states that the provision of sidewalks for major
rehabilitation projects involving only new pavement overlays of one-inch thickness or greater
would only be required if curb, gutter, and related drainage facilities were already in place; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 20 Amendment states that the agency may consider context, cost,
probable use, and severe topographic or biological constraints in its decision not to provide
provisions for bicyclists and pedestrians; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 20 Amendment states that the procedure for excluding
accommodations for pedestrians and bicyclists includes the agency notifying SA.NDAG that
bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities will not be included in the project along with written
justification for that decision; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 20 Amendment states that the decision to exclude accommodations
for bicyclists and pedestrians must be made in the public hearing required by Section 5.A of the
Extension Ordinance; and
9-17
..____ h_ _. _..______ _._
Resolution No. 2008-110
Page 3
WHEREAS, the proposed list of projects to be funded by TRANSNET during fiscal
years 2008/2009 through 2012/2013 is consistent v"ith the City's existing Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) and the proposed changes to the CIP for fiscal year 2008/2009; and
WHEREAS, the streets included in the Major Pavement Rehabilitation Program are
chosen from the list which was compiled on the basis of the City's Pavement Management
System; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on April 22, 2008, as required by
Section 5.A of the Extension Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
as follows:
I. That it approves the submittal of certain projects for the TRANSNET Local Street
Improvement Program to the San Diego Association of Governments for inclusion in
the Regional Transportation Improvement Program for fiscal years 2008/2009
through 2012/2013.
2. That it certifies that pursuant to Section 2~C of the Extension Ordinance, no more than
30 percent of its annual TRANSNET revenues shall be spent on maintenance-related
projects.
3. That it certifies that, pursuant to Section 8 of the Ex1ension Ordinance, the required
minimum annual level of local discretionary funds to be expended for street and road
purposes will be met throughout the five-year period consistent with the most recent
Maintenance of Effort Requirements adopted by SANDAG.
4. That it certifies that, pursuant to Section 9.A of the Extension Ordinance, the City
will extract at least $2,000 from the private sector for each newly constructed
residential housing unit to comply with the provisions of the Regional Transportation
Congestion Improvement Program.
5. That it certifies that, pursuant to Section 13 of the Extension Ordinance, a separate
Transportation Improvement Account has been established, with earned interest
expended only for those purposes for which the funds were allocated.
6. That it certifies that, pursuant to Section 18 of the Extension Ordinance, each project
of $250,000 or more will be clearly designated during construction with TRANS:N'ET
project funding identification signs.
7. That the City will indemnify, hold harmless and defend SANDAG, the San Diego
County Regional Transportation Commission, and all officers and employees thereof
against all causes of action or claims related to local TRANSNET funded projects.
9-18
Resolution No. 2008-110
Page 4
8. That it certifies that, pursuant'to Section 4.E.3 of the Extension Ordinance, all new
projects, or major reconstruction projects, funded by TRANSNET revenues shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists with the following exceptions,
along with the accompanying justification:
A. The North Broadway Reconstruction project (STM354) qualifies as a
major reconstruction project under the Rule 20 Amendment. Staff intends
to exclude the bikeway treatment in the North Broadway Reconstruction
project because a parallel route with appropriate accommodations exists
on Fifth A venue that would require no more than Yo-mile total out of
direction travel. The parallel route on Fifth Avenue is included in the
Bikeway Master Plan. 4
B. Because the new overlay project on Main Street from the west I-80S inter-
change to Oleander Avenue ""ill be over one inch thick, .the project
qualifies as a major rehabilitation project under the Rule 20 Amendment.
Staff intends to exclude the bikeway treatment on Main Street from the
west I-80S interchange to Oleander Avenue because Main Street, which is
currently designated as a Class 3 bike route in the Bikeway Master Plan,
crosses the freeway and there is insufficient lane width for a Class 2 bike
lane. Staff intends to consider additional bicycle facilities in conjunction
with future interchange improvements.
C. Because the new overlay project on the north side of East H Street
between Terra Nova Drive and Del Rey Boulevard will be over one incb
thick, the project qualifies as a major rehabilitation project under the Rule
20 Amendment. Staff intends to exclude sidewalks on the north side of
East H Street between Terra Nova Drive and Del Rey Boulevard for the
following reasons: (1) due to its location adjacent to the City's Multiple
Species Conservation Program area, there are severe topographic and
biological constraints; (2) there is insufficient right-of-way; and (3) there
is no development adjacent to the project so there is no demand for
pedestrian access or the potential for future demand for pedestrian access.
D. Because the new overlay project on Wueste Road between Otay Lakes
Road and Lake Crest Drive will be over one inch thick, the project
qualifies as a major rehabilitation project under the Rule 20 Amendment.
Staff intends to exclude sidewalks on Wueste Road between Otay Lakes
Road and Lake Crest Drive for the following reasons: (1) it is a two-lane
road without existing curb, gutter and drainage facilities; and (2) there is
no development adjacent to tbe project so there is no demand for
pedestrian access or the potential for future demand for pedestrian access.
9-19 ____ _.__ __.___.________ __
Resolution No. 2008-110
Page 5
E. Because the new overlay project on Broadway from Faivre Street to Beyer
Boulevard will be over one inch thick, the project qualifies as a major
rehabilitation project under the Rule 20 Amendment. Staff intends to
exclude sidewalks on Broadway from Faivre Street to Beyer Boulevard for
the following reasons: (1) it is a two-lane road without existing curb,
gutter and drainage facilities; (2) there are only industrial facilities
adjacent to the project and these uses do not create a demand for
pedestrian access or the potential for future demand for pedestrian access;
and (3) it is currently being maintained as a Class 3 bike route in
accordance with the City's Bikeway Master Plan.
9. That it certifies that all applicable provisions of the Ordinance, the Extension
Ordinance, and SANDA G Board Policy 3] have been met.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~f'~\\\~~~
.
Ann Moore
City Attorney
9-20
Resolution No. 2008-110 .
Page 6
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 22nd day of April 2008 by the following vote:
A YES: Councilmembers:
Ramirez, Rindone, and Cox
NAYS: Councilmembers:
None
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
Castaneda
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
McCann
ATTEST:
~
Cheryl Cox, .; yo
AL Ie: ;fo;,kL
Donna R. Norris, C;interim City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Donna R. Norris, Interim City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 2008-110 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council
at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 22nd day of April 2008.
Executed this 22nd day of April 2008.
~~ K ffi~
Donna R. Norris, CMC, Interim City Clerk
_ ___m__ ___ _ __.9_=2.1..._____
ATTACHMENT 2
TRANSNET ALLOCATION - FY 2009 THROUGH FY 2013
co
I
N
N
,ifimoS'loS'rll Iffi:y,-iO'/lIm:@ IBlIi~~}mol1l~~4 ~""C!\,j;fjm\i:l.V~ &!fi'''''~~''''Il~
,,,,'v...,A,Wjc.,,,,,,.,^",,,-4~m Ii <'-.', <~,. .""".' , ~dlL~, <<~Ift} < ~Yltji1~1~!It ~" 1'C4:1j2~1!~J, ,
Estimated Annual Allocation $4,577,000 $4,779,000 $5,028,000 $5,290,000 $5,540,000
Major Pavement Rehabilitation (Overlays) $1,410,000 $3,350,000 $3,525,000 $3,600,000 $3,750,000
Traffic Signal System Optimization (TF350) $150,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
1-805, SR54 and Otay Mesa Transportation System
Improvements $110,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000
N, Broadway Reconstruction (STM354) $895,995
Palomar Gateway (STL280) $200,000
1-5/ H Street Interchange Improvements (STM362) $490,000
SUBTOTAL Congestion Relief $3,255,995 $3,490,000 $3,665,000 $3,740,000 $3,890,000
Congestion Relief ('1'1'354) $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000
Sidewalk Installation/ Rehabilitation $100,000
Pedestrian/ Bicycle Master Plans $61,000
I-Iarborside Elementary Pedestrian Improvements $85,000
Minor Pavement Rehabilitatiun Program (Including seals) $600,000 $850,000 $925,000 $1, I 00,000 $1,150,000
Advance Planning Studies (OP202) $45,000 $47,000 $50,000 $52,000 $55,000
Traffic Monitoring Program ('1'1'321 and '1'1'325) $75,000
Urban Core Level of Service Thresholds Study $50,000
Traffic Signing ('1'1'332), Studies and Signal Upgrade $250,000 $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 $55,000
SVBTOT AL Maintenance $1,341,000 $1,027,000 $1,105,000 $1,282,000 $1,335,000
TOTAL $4,596,995 $4,517,000 $4,770,000 $5,022,000 $5,225,000
Prepared 4/8/08
ATTACHMENT
4-
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-042
SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
C ULA VISTA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO THE
FIScAL YEAR 2008/2009 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR
20 2/2013 SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
GIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
P OGRAM FOR SUBMITTAL TO CALTRANS AS PART OF
T E FEDERAL ECONOMIC RECOVERY (STIMULUS)
P OGRAM
\Vl1ERE S, the United States House of Representatives and Senate passed HR1, The
American Recov ry and Reinvestment Act, on February 13,2009. This bill is also known as the
Federal Economi Recovery (Stimulus) Program; and
S, the President of the United States signed HRl into law on February 17,
WHERE S, the total amount of funding included in the "Highway" portion of the
program is appro imately $27.5 billion, with the California portion estimated at $2.6 billion.
Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) approval must be obtained within 120 days of the
President's signat, e for the first phase of funding; and
I
WHERE~S, Caltrans and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) informed
local agencies on !February 11,2009 that, due to their limited review time, proposed local agency
projects should e restricted to paving, traffic signal, and street improvement projects.
Additionally, pro osed projects need to be within the current approved five-year Regional
Transportation I rovement Program (RTIP); and
WHERE S, the City has existing projects in the current RTIP that meet SANDAG and
Caltrans criteria d have sufficient local or TransNet funding during the five-year period.
These are CHV3~, Traffic Signal Upgrade, and CHV48, Pavement Major Rehabilitation, The
City can swap thelexisting funding for the Federal funds.
NOW, T~EREFORE' BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereb approve the amendment to the fiscal year 2008/2009 through fiscal year
2012/2013 SAN AG RTIP for submittal to Caltrans as part of the Federal Economic Recovery
(Stimulus) Prograin.
!
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~
! ~.-/~
Richard A. op s
Public Works Dinbctor
i
-____L.
9-23
Resolution No. 2009-042
Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 3rd day of March 2009 by the following vote:
AYES:
Councilmem bers:
Bensoussan, Castaneda, Ramirez, and Cox
NAYS:
Councilmembers:
None
ABSENT:
Councilmembers:
McCann
ATTEST:
l~49t
Cheryl Cox, ay r
~ tf,JY~
Donna R. Norris, C C, CIty Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Donna R. Norris, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2009-042 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a
regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 3rd day of March 2009.
Executed this 3rd day of March 2009.
4~M~ R ~ALI
Donna R. Norris, cMC, City Clerk ~
~-?4
CD
I
N
CJ1
JRP.J,,~NET J~L-L.Q_CA!!Q~f__E'y' 20Y9-10 ____ .... ____ ____I _ ----__ u___ _1_______ _____u____
~~j"'i~~~ ..~- . :--lcII'-'-.1 M-".<>'D_._ ",dT'.",o,,1 jC"hL~"",~,,;o;k~,~~oo I~;~",~f..."-- ~::;i~?l:,
'~!1;,!;t3~~jj~~':~~~:!!~~~~~=~E~2i~-~-~~+~~===~
!fi~::~:i:~:;::""-~~~~.~~ct=-=~~~@~=== ~::I-=~ ==,===~ ==:=:
.:~~0!st~a~~1lfT~ceftJd'c------.I~~~;~F--l~~v~1..(~d) ----------j3L2,68~---------$i45,3061- --- ------- -
Industriall3.c. Bjk.:eL~~ne(tol-=_st)_~=1 STl,360-=.c;HVb -==~=--=-=-==:::=----== ==--=---$:3.~355 . ----- --------
~~i~~j~o~~~a~i~~i~s_;;Ie_ty=__=_:IIII~;~~ JI~y~%t~:~~ ==--=---=-:=~=-_l=-:-~_--=-=_::=-=-::: ==-:~~~~-------=:--:-:
~~~':~~~~::id~:~~~:~u~~~~r I ~~~335594-- ~~V~ 9 ------$2,368;600 _________$~05,OQ~___=_____ --------------=
~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~i:tem--=:-~~~~~~:=-1~~~:: =::===:=---=~=~-I::=- - ~:-~J;~l~~I---:-------- -----~=--~-
;::~]~~~~;J:~~~-:-~~~Ig~:-====;~:I=.===--- i. =. ~;O';=-"'IOO:;
Second Ave Imp N-aPles~palomar--i-ISTL3;\2:lcf-lva-------------'--'--'- _n - ------$-25:000 --
--SiaewaIKSafety:-rStreet(see -~ ---- ----- --- - ______n_ ----- ---- --- --
__~Tl:}36, STl347 h!.nds)~ ~TL363 _ CHV1.El..__i--____ _ ________ ___ _____ __ $0 ____ _
S Broadw~yJr:r1Il..Maln St south STM367JgHVd _____ _ ____ _ $50Q,OOOj_
SRTS Otayl Rice Elementary_ ___ T.f.361___ CHV~:3.(old) __ _ ___J~,QQQ ________n ______-= - _ ~- n _
J:raffiCC-a1f11in1L---------~345 CHV33(old) ______ _____ 1__ ____n_ i____ $130,000 ___
~~:~~ ~~~~: ~~}~~~~~~i~~~;:;::x:. ~~~~~-- g~-q~}- -- --- - ----- -- -- - -)- ----- - ----- - ~~-l ------~--:~~~:~~~
TrafficSignal-&StreetlightMod---. ~ITF366n-CHV35 -- -- - --- ----- - 1--- _n -- --- ---1- - $140,000. $20,000
-----.-----.------------------ ---------[-------.- ---------- .-..---------T----------------------~---.-.---------.---
Traffic Sig.nal S.yst"ITl_QiJ.ti~zaJiol1..._IJ:F]~-O--. CHV39_ __ ... . ... . . $.50,000
~~~~:il~~n~r~t~~~~Joni~r...--- -~~~~~ - F~~~~ -:= --=-~=~:~ ::=..::-=--:F:=-~~::=----$~~QO(}r=-:-=-$~OO,~~~ ~------::.=::
--.--------.---. ---- .-----.-1-----------1------------....--------.--.----- .- -----r--- --..- ------ - -- ---.- ------------.--- . ---- --
SR54 Corricl()r8,Arteri"ls.______IIE~9___g1\,/43._____I------.. __ _______ ___ ______m_$30]lOClI ____________=______===_____-__
~~;;:~~~~Tt~i~~f1F<,,'ief-----------i~~;~~ --..+~~0:}-- -----------------..-- --1- -n--------------t=...- ~~~:~~~. ------
RE~~:~~~1~~~~~-~~~..:. =_~~F---~-~--i--~-===--I~-~====---!4~~4~:6~5-1=-====-=~~Ti$5i~~!~$1~3[~,%~-I=- $3, 380,O%g
~
f;
ii
m
~
U\
RECOMMENDED OVERLA YSI RECONSTRUCTS
.'xistillP.'t<'acilitirs
Street N:lIl1e
-1
hdlli!ia!!
llc1!illnine
LOl'lllion
Endinl!
Location
nllh~ 21 ACl'Ummod;lIions
Uindr l\IUSIll'U
Facililv Tvne
Prllrstrinn I\IrRslIrn
lli.rn.!..t
uOHITt\fW
CD
I
N
en
Shawu roadwuy Iconlinu01l5 sidewalks.
(BMP recommends a bike
BROADWAY FAIVRE'sf '--SE'i'E"ifsLVD "-'-Majo':--Lj"rb-~'~'s'i;eel" ..... ~'i::)~'2"b;ke~~y'''' . INoi"r';q~i;~d'"
~_._..~--,-_..,..------~----y-_.._----~---_.__.~.--._--- ~~~,~~~-~-~-~=~:.-~~~~~~~__I.^.___----_....~_._-----_.----
BROADWAY MAIN ST FAIVRE ST Major Urban Street Class 2 bikeway (BMP [If there are no curb & gutter, No facilities Curb,gulter and atdewalk on the eut
--~~--~---..._-~------------__.___ ~!":2.T_I!'!'~~~!IIJ_!.~I_.I~~~~_I~~~!~_~_~_!!~q~~e~~____ _~_.._,____~.~ ~!.~_e..2~!y__.____~._
BROADWAY ANITA ST MAIN ST Major Urban Street Class 2 bikeway IlContlnuOU5 sidewalks both sides INO facililles Sidewalk both sides
(4-L Major) (BMP recommeds a Class 3)
.-..................................1..................................................... ........... . ......................................... . . ....... ...............
BROADWAY D STREET F STREET Major Urban Street Class 2 bikeway I Continuous sidewalks both sides rNO facililles Sidewalk both sides
(4-L Major) IBMP does not recommed
:::~:::v..-_. :.::~~::~ER.--.-..- .~::~:i::~.. .. -_.~::~~::~.~~~~... ~~f.~:'::::~:;::.b;:~.. [:~:;~~:~.'::::~:t:~.b~t:.~:,.....:I:t;~, ..-.-......--.
(4-L Major) (BMP recommends a bike I I
u~:~;~,,/ 1-~~~.~:[~~~~~~f~i~:~M:~~:::.f,~[:t~l;~~:~{i~~~i~.~~~f~l:i~~:.....- ~~}\~~~~;;;[..... ...I~f;~;~:~;1[~:x~~~._~.....=: ..-......1
F.: Ij.ST- Tf:HHANOVA,m~ 1;l:HtJEl.PL: Malu( Ulu.ln StrOlel _ Class 2 bl"eway IConllfHlOlfs si\JewaJ,s . <
~A1~_:'~t~...~,~.~_-~_=_~.-,~?_~.A..s:.[~.=.::.~~.._~.-~.=~~~IL.I.~~~_~_:-~n .....,...........~.~o.~..~r~.~~~~,~.!8T.-.-_~~.=_~_~- ~T.~_~~f~iE~.;~Y... _'-00' '..m.....~.-.~]~~.i.~~.~.~..~~~.~_~_~_i~.~.-.==.=.~.= =_=~_~_=.=.~.~===.==.= ~~_
EASTLAKE 'PW GREENSGATE OR CLUBHOUSE DR Major Urban Street Class 2 bIkeway iContinuous sidewalks
~.6.i~...~f,...'...'~_.:'~_.. . .i_:-~.~:~'t~.~~~~!...~~~.'.~.'.:.. _.:,9.~~~.~.~D.~.~ ."611 _. _~_aj~,~.g~.~~.~_~:~~~L .'.:.. ~.i.~_~~.'.:?_._~~'_~.~\i!i~ 1~?.~!E~~_~~!.'...~i~~.~~~.~~~..=.'..__._______n................
~~~'it~~i'~'Ci - -2lC-~H6-8~-~n6~ .- i={~}ig:6-~~~~.R ~.:-l:~.ij~~bb:~-~~i;::in ~:;:;..~ ~r~e::;:y 1~~.~i~~:~Js~~r:-:1~j~S..b~t.h-;.id~.;-
~:~~~:.:~sY(!lf~~f:C--~.i~i:~!T~(:i:li~(tE-=.'.'_ ........ {i6FjliX~.~~.~~....~:...=.~=.'..-- ~j~j?.r~~~;!.~~~.~~T: ~.i.~~.~.:L0~~~~~.~i~--~ , :::.....~.:.:=.~=.I ~~.~i!i.~_~_~~_~~..~~.~.~.~~~I.~.=.~.~:_~~.=..~.=.=_~~
MAIN ST OLEANDER AV OELNISO CT Major Urban Street Class 2 bikew..y lContinuous sidewalks both sIdes
MAIN ST OElNISO CT ROMA CT ,..... . ~~jo(C%:~nSlr~e-1 Cia's.s'-2nb-ik~~~y.... lc'oni'in~o~'; s-ide~a-ik';'
~:':~~TI;t~. tI~i';~LLR~:=~ ~~i?~:7r~~A1;;;LETiXi!!0,::~:~fff:~~;;t.- ~~?:~::~f~:d" blk, . ~ 1~~~::::~:Iif::::tf=.~::::~:~:~.=::::::::::
TELEGRAPH' CANyo-N'T805F'R'EEwAYRAMP~"~ -^< 'j:aOS.FREEwi\Y'^RAM^P U;:b~-;;Co!iect-;;'- ~.~~~-;;;r;:~ad-;"~y--'--- 'IC,,(;i;-llil~;u-;-;id'~walks~..'--- _._n .._..0,_0.0_._.._.____ --~"-- ..., ---00--------
NA-Plj~-S"S.T---n - 00'00"'''. __n. MELR'cisE AV""'" ---". _00' FOXSORO"s'i- .00...... ""'''00 '--U-~b~~"c~il~'~t~; Shared roadway c~~'I'i~uo~-sn~ide-';':a'ik~bothn~i'de~ Class 3 Sidewalk both aides
(g!.<l_~_~_n!LC:::l?_!!.!~t,?rl O!:'tslde..travellane >=14 n I
M'ELROSE'AV TELEGRAPH CANYON RD MAIN 5T Urban Collector Shared roadway Contlnuou; sIdewalks boih s~des Class 3
___n..._n........_..._.................._ . on on . ~~.I.~.~.~...~n~I:).~.~=.~.~~) ADT <6500 .. j _ _ _.._
G ST Urban Collector Shared roadway IConUnuous sidewalks both sides
." '00" 00.00''''''''''''' .4:_1" .I:J~!>~,n .:~,~t!rfa._I) t~a""_~.Ua._n_~ ,?'.7..1,~. ~ . I...... ,,_ 0000.00 n'"_,, ,..., ..__. ,... ......... _00."""''''
ORANGE AV ."h_.._....~~:;~~~~_~~.;.:.~~_~~'- r::~:~:ne >"14 ft jCOnlinUous sidewalks both sides
FIRST AV Urban Collector Shared rO~-d~~y._.._._.._nn_-----lc~~ti.~.~~.u-~..sid.e.;.;alk-~..b~th--;id;; -. Ci;-~~'3""'''-''.-'''
.... ... .......................---.. (<;:I~.s,.s.JL<:;o!J~.!?!~.rl. 9_u_!_s.!.~,eJr,!!y.~,!..I.<l,n.~.?''''1_.~ .fL_.! ............... n ___00___ 0000 ___ ____0000 .._, ".. ,_....__ ..,_........... .... .... 0000 0000..00.......
SECOND AV Urban Collector Shared roadway I Continuous sidewalks both sides No facilities
(Class III CoUector)~ 18MP does not recommend I
BROADviAY~.--n_-_.~-'FOURTH ~AVE'^V-- ~--,.~- U;ba";;'-C~I;c~~--"~" ~~~r~~:::~;a-y-----~..,,_.^n, .1C;;;ji~--J~-;:..~-;ide~~Ik';b;;th -~id~~'-'--' Noi~ciliti~~~~..-~._.._--'
(Class II Collector) _~~~~i.:;~~~t___r_~_~_~:~:~_d___L nn___ ___ 0000____0000 ___ ___ ___".... ".....,.... ,... ,........... u.. .... J ___ _00 n"'" ,_<' __....._n.... ,... ,.........
or/lYtj~I(ESHQ
crr(. UMITS .
UrLnm colleclclr
Sidewalk both sides
F'OURTH AV
F ST
Class 3
...h........n..._....
Sidewalk both sides
FOURTH AV
L ST
Class 3
........................-----------.......
SIdewalk both sides
r-si--'-"'-'--"'-'-"---"--"'SROADWA Y
SIdewalk both sides
c sr
N GLOVER AV
Sidewalk both aides
G sr
_ ___+ .._ __...... _.~_'M.._
....." jSideWalk both sides
~
()
f
m
z
~
I~
I
CD
I
I'.)
--..l
l si-'''' ._"__.h____ ---FOURTH"AVE--"..-m_--.----.... n."'THIRO'A,r''''- -. h~-'-"U'~b~n Co"iiector . ......-..-....-.. Sh~;.~-d-io~d-~~V...-..._....-.. .........TC~~tln~-;;~-;-.;id-e;aiks.-b.oth ~ide-&.-.._--.
(Class I Collector) (BMP does not recommend I
any bikeway) Outside travel
lane :>"'14'eet i
E..~!:3T-....'--:.._-.--~-~--.--i(EKiJi~L:pC~-~....---~.-.u,~.._....._'._......6F.l..Ri~:;,:Bl... ..~.."....~...:-._....t~'ai;;;..urt;;.;~~lr;:;:~t- -~:.:~:.._. 6~;~_-2-bik;;~at....._."--....-~.I~;;;;;.i;~~?~.~-;:i(j~-;~-ikS~.... n............ .......n
6ASis:;b.V--~-.NAi,iE:fTE~~-~---i:f'OXFORLl-ST~.-.-.-u._~;~{k;Z~iJ.--.~_. .. .- Sh;;:ed~~;d,;;Y--~lc~ni;i~~Cts-;~ikS-- .-,----
(BMP does not recommend .
any bikeway)" < .
Sh~-;~d~O-:;d~~;;Y"-_-'T""-:-- Co'nti~;;~~;s~icj"~.~~~ik-;_.--".."...--..---.
tBMP does not recornf!1.end
nnybikewny} ,
ShareJ7;;;dway -_.
(BMP doc" not recolnmellu
anybikew<lY) ,
cAvER-i~~poiNi:GT~..--poIiH.BARROW.DR~.-;.~'-.~-"--..SCDS-."~.".-...,-.-.._.;:--"l;;t,:;nl;:;cai'-..-."-.-.- . ---- Sl~;;~.d.r~wad-;;~y.-....-..-"'---.-. COr'~'i;';~;;~T;~ide-;;';'liZS'w-- ._.__.~-
tBMP does not recornmend
~.!!Y~~~rl.n....---,.~.__L~__
Shared rO<ldway _ .lOl1tiIlU(lUS sidewalks
(BMPdoes nol reO!llHnend
<lnyhikeway) ,
, .,...
sEi~Clr,i'D A\,.7:';------P;\l6~W~~G-:r:.....--
. '--w--...-.-6iJT~j.rI\-R"lj"sT-h----w;~~-c~il~-~lOr."-~..."-...
""
'.
I, ., ,
wl'iiill.TEnf.:O -~--OrAY.li,KESRD .-.
I"AI~E--CRj:ST.DR
U,bBn IDeal
, '.
, ",.":,
, "
"~---~.._-~----
'fO'~Orr-------:-BIST~oP."ST.
----sTiERwooD-s:r.
Ulban IDcal
RESOLUTION NO. 2009
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING PART A OF THE JULY 2009
AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSNET LOCAL STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SUB MITT AL TO THE SAN
DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR
INCLUSION IN THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008/2009
THROUGH 2012/2013 AND PROVIDING CERTIFICATION
AND INDEMNITY STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN
TRANSNETFUNDS
WHEREAS, on November 3, 1987, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2004, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego County Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (Transnet
Extension Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, the Transnet Extension Ordinance provides that the San Diego Association
of Governments (SANDAG), acting as the Regional Transportation Commission, shall approve a
multi-year program of projects submitted by local jurisdictions identifying those transportation
projects eligible to use transportation sales tax (Transnet) funds; and
WHEREAS, in January 2009, the City of Chula Vista was provided with an estimate of
annual Transnet local street improvement revenues for fiscal years 2009 through 2013; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2008, pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 3106 through 3110, the City
Council adopted the Western Chula Vista Transportation Development Fee (WTDIF) at a rate of
$3,243 per Equivalent Development Unit; and
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2005, pursuant to Resolution No. 2005-014, the City Council
adopted the City's Bikeway Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, in January 2008, SANDAG staff acknowledged this Plan as complete,
consistent with the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan, and coordinated with other jurisdictions;
and
WHEREAS, Section 4.E.3 of the Extension Ordinance states that all new projects, or
major reconstruction projects, funded by revenues provided under this Ordinance shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, except where pedestrians and bicyclists are
prohibited by law from using a given facility or where the costs of including bikeways and
walkways would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use; and
9-28
Resolution No. 2009-
Page 2
WHEREAS, Rule 21 "Accommodation of Bicyclists and Pedestrians" was adopted by the
SANDAG Board on February 22, 2008, to provide a guide to appropriate accommodation
measures for various types of streets; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 21 Amendment states that a local jurisdiction may use a bicycle or
pedestrian master plan adopted by the city council and approved by SANDAG to determine the
appropriate means of accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians in a given project and at a
minimum provide the facilities called for in the plan; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that no exclusions are required under Rule 21 for the
projects proposed to be added to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP); and
WHEREAS, the proposed amended list of projects to be funded by Transnet during
Fiscal Years 2008/2009 through 2012/2013 is'consistent with the City's existing Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and the proposed changes to the CIP for Fiscal Year 2009/2010;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chu1a Vista has held a noticed Public
Hearing on May 12, 2009, with an agenda item that clearly identified the proposed list of
projects prior to approval of the projects in accordance with by Section 5(A) of the Extension
Ordinance and Rule 7 of SAl'\lDAG Board Policy 31; and
WHEREAS, though all of the Capital Improvement Projects in the July 2009
Amendment to be sent to SANDAG and the associated SANDAG allocations are identified in
Exhibit C, attached, only those listed on Exhibit A are to be addressed and approved through this
Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby:
1. Approves part A of the July 2009 Amendment to the Transnet Local Street
Improvement Program for submittal to the San Diego Association of
Governments for inclusion in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
for Fiscal Years 2008/2009 through 2012/2013. The specific proj ects and funding
included in Part A of the July 2009 Amendment are shown on Exhibit A. The
City's proposed Major Pavement Rehabilitation projects are shown on Exhibit B.
2. Certifies pursuant to Section 2(C)(1) of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, no
more than 30 percent of its annual Transnet revenues shall be spent on
maintenance-related projects.
3. Certifies pursuant to Section 4(E)(3) of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, all new
projects, or major reconstruction projects, funded by Transnet revenues shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, and that any exception to the
requirement permitted under the Ordinance and proposed shall be clearly noticed
as part of the City of Chu1a Vista's public hearing process.
9-29
Resolution No. 2009-
Page 3
4. Certifies pursuant to Section 8 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, the required
minimum annual level of local discretionary funds to be expended for street and
road purposes will be met throughout the five-year period consistent with the
most recent Maintenance of Effort Requirements adopted by SANDAG.
5. Certifies pursuant to Section 9.A of the Extension Ordinance, the City will extract
at least $2,000 from the private sector for each newly constructed residential
housing unit to comply with the provisions of the Regional Transportation
Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP).
6. Certifies pursuant to Section 13 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, a separate
Transportation Improvement Account has been established for Transnet revenues,
with earned interest expended only for those purposes for which the funds were
allocated.
7. Certifies pursuant to Section 18 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, each project
of $250,000 or more will be clearly designated during construction with Transnet
project funding identification signs.
8. Indemnifies, holds harmless and defends SANDAG, the San Diego County
Regional Transportation Commission, and all officers and employees thereof
against all causes of action or claims related to local Transnet funded projects.
9. Certifies all applicable provisions of the Ordinance, the Extension Ordinance, and
SANDAG Board Policy 31 have been met.
Presented by
Richard A. Hopkins
Director of Public Works
9-30
EXHIBIT A
TRANSNET ALLOCATION - FY 2010
..,., - -< ..,~~;~~~ ;~.:"
::~MR9 10:'
Bikeway Master Plan Update (STL351)
Advance Planning Studies (OP202), (OP208)
Emergency Storm Drain Repair (DR 180)
N. Broadway Reconstruction (STM354)
Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (STL291)
CHV-NEW
CHV22
CHV-NEW
CHV19
CHV25
co
I
w
-'
Pedestrian Master Plan (STL323)
School Zone Traffic Calming Program (TF345, TF361)
Improvements
Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements (STL303, 304, 305, 342)
CHV26
CHV33
CHV44
CHV-NEW
Pavement Major Rehabilitation Program(STL354), excluding
Fourth Ave. L to Orange; Main SI. west to east 1-805 ramps;
Fourth Ave. F to G SI.; F Street Broadway to Hilltop
Naples and Oleander Cross Gutter (STL359)
CHV48
CHV-NEW
South Broadway Improvements South of Main SI. (STL356)
Traffic Signal System Optimization (TF350)
Pavement Rehabilitation Program (STL355)
Neighborhood Traffic and Ped Safety (TF327, TF362)
Traffic Monitoring Program (TF321 ,TF325)
Congestion Relief Study and Implementation (TF354)
Traffic Signing (TF332), Studies and Signal Upgrade (TF366)
CHV-NEW
CHV39
CHV06
CHV34
CHV45
CHV43
CHV35
Prepared 4/30/09
EXHIBIT B
RECOMMENDED OVERLAYS/ RECONSTRUCTS (CHV48)
Street Name Beginning Ending
Location Location
BROADWAY FAIVRE ST BEYER BLVD
._._......>--~._.,. ~_._----~------.. ---...-- .
BROADWA Y MAIN ST FAIVREST
______.___.__-.._~__.__.g_._~.'___,.. ,w,__"_,_"~,._,_,_~__"""""_"__",,,_,,,,,_~_,,__,_________~,,,___~__________._,_.....__
BROADWA Y ANITA ST MAIN ST
--~--.-----_._..._~----~._..~~_._,-'.--...---- H.__
BROADWA Y D STREET F STREET
_._~~._~__H_____'''_''''~__~'''''__~~"'''''''__ ...~__."-'_______'b'_,~~",_"-",.~__"___",,,_________..~_,,~_~__......___~~_,.
E ORANGE A V HILL TOP DR MELROSE A V
____,.___.._n.'___._____..._...'".~___.4 ...._____..--..____~_~_..__..._.~.._~.__'___________~.____._"_.....____._
MAIN ST ROMA CT MAXWELL RD
~____~.__,'__..~_,~'._._,...._._,._....._.~M_'_'__M~__M_.._~____..~_ ._~----~._._.._._--_.
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP OLEANDER AV
1--------------------- - --- -------
EASTLAKE PW OT A Y LAKES RD GREENSGATE DR
---_._----_._-_..~_.__.'--~--~---------------_. .--------
EASTLAKE PW CLUBHOUSE DR TRINIDAD COVE
-------~----~._.._-_. -- -.-.--
MAIN ST OLEANDER A V DELNISO CT
._______.___~___M~__.________~_~ ----~--~----_. -
MAIN ST DELNISO CT ROMA CT
----~-------_._---_. -~-------~~-~---
MAIN ST MAXWELL RD NIRVANA AV
__._______...__.___.._~__u~_____4______~.___
TELEGRAPH CANYON RD 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
-~-~--~._-_._~-_._~-_._._~----~-~~- .--
NAPLES ST MELROSE A V FOXBORO ST
--~'---~.------------------=-------~..., -
MELROSE A V TELEGRAPH CANYON RD MAIN ST
~-----_._."'~-_"'-~--~_'."--._~--_'_-_---"'_--~-------,~-_._...._--~-_._-~-,~-,~----.._~_..
CST NGLOVERAV SECOND A V
~~-------~'---~--~---~.------~----~~---_. ~--_.~-~- --~._-~-- ---
GST BROADWA Y FOURTH AVE
___~~____...._._ri_____~~__"_~'__".'____~~_'_'~~___,_,__~_,~~____~______~___,.__.___..~."_.--...._.
L ST FOURTHAVE THIRD A V
-
9-32
EXHIBIT C
TRANSNET ALLOCATION - FY 2010
)t:'~""" '1 ;~,)S~ ..t~'?;.~,. :~;:'!: ::.,;,-z;:.-:. . <'1,.~~,:!~i;'1;if!:"'fJ;;';'~:. ,iNi,.;;:~""';,);; 'l''':;A;1'''''.~~'''\,:. i;~~,':;r ,';'\ ;/_~ F,Y,{09/,10","" 0/; .~!rl ',:,F~'(. 09t1 O~'::'t
i; _\;~t:'!~{'\1Jl1i":'~- '~~{;'~"~;1t~i~ko~'~dfJY'~ti?t>~~;::'?;:~~];f{~~t~~~ ;;:tt I~R~~ipjp ~d'}~'~~~~J~;t1.c~~h' :~C'~~g~~:ti,~~tR'~il~i) ~'M'~{~~t~;;~n2~':~-
Estimated Annual Allocation $3,120,000 $1,331,000
Bikeway Master Plan Update (STL351)
Advance Planning Studies (OP202), (OP208)
Emergency Storm Drain Repair (DR 180)
N. Broadway Reconstruction (STM354)
Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (STL291)
1-805 Olympic Parkway Interchange Improvements (STM328)
Pedestrian Master Plan (STL323)
School Zone Traffic Calming Program (TF345, TF361)
Improvements
Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements (STL303, 304, 305, 342)
STL361 )
Naples and Oleander Cross Gutter (STL359)
Pavement Major Rehabilitation Program (STL354)
South Broadway Improvements South of Main St. (STL356)
Traffic Signal System Optimization (TF350)
Pavement Rehabilitation Program (STL355)
Neighborhood Traffic and Ped Safety (TF327, TF362)
Traffic Monitoring Program (TF321 ,TF325)
Congestion Relief Study and Implementation (TF354)
Traffic Signing (TF332), Studies and Signal Upgrade (TF366)
TOTAL
Remaining Funds
Prepared 4/30/09
CHV-NEW $50,000
CHV22 $82,000
CHV-NEW $1,200,000
CHV19 $2,368,000
CHV25 $235,000
CHV01 $472,685
CHV26 $45,000
CHV33 $97,000 $130,000
CHV44 $90,000 M
CHV-NEW $70,000 M
I
en
CHV-NEW $180,655
CHV-NEW $205,000
CHV48 $2,020,000
CHV-NEW $500,000
CHV39 $50,000
CHV06 $450,000
CHV34 $320,000
CHV45 $110,000
CHV43 $70,000
CHV35 $240,000
$4,549,685 $3,115,655 $1,320,000
$4,345 $11,000
EXHIBIT C
RECOMMENDED OVERLAYS/RECONSTRUCTS (CRV 48)
Street Name Beeinnine Endine
Location Location
BROADWAY FAIVRE ST BEYER BLVD
-------~-_.,-~--~--~~._._--._------~--_........_-_._--~._-,----------------..._~-~-,
BROADWA Y MAIN ST FAIVRE ST
_._- --_.'~~-'-'-~'--'--~-' .-- _.._.__~'...M .....----...
BROADWA Y ANITA ST MAIN ST
--.-- --~_._--*-..-----~--_. ~..~_._~----
BROADWA Y D STREET F STREET
____~._._,_._-.._.a_"~.__..__..."'_~"__~__..._._~,_,____~-..,~,,__,_.____.._._.._, ~-_........_--._._--~-_...
E ORANGE A V HILL TOP DR MELROSE A V
'~'---'-~~---------"'--'----- .....-.__._.~-_..~~--
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
"_'___"~___'____.~'__'~__"_4~".,__...._~_.__",_~~_,~___,._._".._~__.._~~,__,_~__~,~_~~_ ~-----~_._.
MAIN ST ROMA CT MAXWELL RD
.,,"--.~~.~~-- -
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP OLEANDER AV
~_.~-~._-~-,,-_.._,-_..._..._.._-_..,,~---,.._~._------'--'~-'-'--~-~.._--------"._--._.._--_.__..-..,-,-~----
EASTLAKE PW OT A Y LAKES RD GREENSGA TE DR
-- - -----~-----~~ --
EASTLAKE PW CLUBHOUSE DR TRINIDAD COVE
-~-'-~-~'-'~'--"'-----~'+-"---_._------~'------'----~---'------~----_._-~-_._-_.-
MAIN ST OLEANDER A V DELNISO CT
MAIN +._.-.~-------..._~---_.~---_.~--------_._-----~._-~---....---
ST DELNISO CT ROMA CT
____.w~_..a_.___._~.______'.___.._._ ._.__._~~- . ._~----~--. --
MAIN ST MAXWELL RD NIRVANA AV I
-_.__.._-_..__..~-----_.- __"_~__'Y__'M~O__.'_.__~.~'__'~___"___~_____~_____~~_._~_"__'.__4
TELEGRAPH CANYON RD 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
---------~---_..._.Y_--------~----~. --- -
NAPLES ST MELROSE A V FOXBORO ST
M_"___'._''''__'~_'__4''''.'''.'_'''''''~~'''_.__~_._'~_''_'_"__~.'''_'_____'__'''_'~A_____'~__,~,~___,_____,__,.~_.'_m.~.~._._
MELROSE A V TELEGRAPH CANYON RD MAIN ST
1--- .-----.- -~._._-,~------~-_.
FOURTHAV FST GST
-- _.'__~""'~~'~'M.'_"'_""'_"'_'_"_~__"'~_"~~'''_'_'_~'_,.~_._..~"_.~__.._.~_,_.A_'__.-..-_,,._,,_,,_~,___..__..w_~~............~__~_____"_______.~___
FOl/RTHAV L ST ORANGE A V
---__._~__.._~~~..__.~_~___..+_~_M____~__. ,---....-.-
FST BROADWA Y HILL TOP DR
--'-~---'-~___~~'_'_..____'_'__._'_.~._'""'--'_______~_~____a~._~'~_____~'_'_'___.'__M'_~____
CST NGLOVERAV SECOND A V
'--"- ,_.~_.-.._...~_~~~~_.._.._N___.___~..________.. -_.~---"..-
GST BROADWA Y FOURTH AVE
'~-~--"-'_.~--"--'~"'-----'-_._-- -~.._-~._---~---------~..._._---
L ST FOURTH AVE THIRD A V
9-34
RESOLUTION NO. 2009
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING PART B OF THE JULY 2009
AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSNET LOCAL STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SUB MITT AL TO THE SAN
DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR
INCLUSION IN THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008/2009
THROUGH 2012/2013 AND PROVIDING CERTIFICATION
AND INDEMNITY STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN
TRANSNETFUNDS
WHEREAS, on November 3, 1987, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2004, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego County Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (Transnet
Extension Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, the Transnet Extension Ordinance provides that the San Diego Association
of Governments (SANDAG), acting as the Regional Transportation Commission, shall approve a
multi-year program of projects submitted by local jurisdictions identifying those transportation
projects eligible to use transportation sales ta'{ (Transnet) funds; and
WHEREAS, in January 2009, the City of Chula Vista was provided with an estimate of
annual Transnet local street improvement revenues for fiscal years 2009 through 2013; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2008, pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 3106 through 3110, the City
Council adopted the Western Chula Vista Transportation Development Fee (WTDIF) at a rate of
$3,243 per Equivalent Development Unit; and
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2005, pursuant to Resolution No. 2005-014, the City Council
adopted the City's Bikeway Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, in January 2008, SANDAG staff acknowledged this Plan as complete,
consistent with the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan, and coordinated with other jurisdictions;
and
WHEREAS, Section 4.E.3 of the Extension Ordinance states that all new projects, or
major reconstruction projects, funded by revenues provided under this Ordinance shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, except where pedestrians and bicyclists are
prohibited by law from using a given facility or where the costs of including bikeways and
walkways would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use; and
9-35
Resolution No. 2009-
Page 2
WHEREAS, Rule 21 "Accommodation of Bicyclists and Pedestrians" was adopted by the
SANDAG Board on February 22, 2008, to provide a guide to appropriate accommodation
measures for various types of streets; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 21 Amendment states that a local jurisdiction may use a bicycle or
pedestrian master plan adopted by the city council and approved by SANDAG to determine the
appropriate means of accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians in a given project and at a
minimum provide the facilities called for in the plan; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that no exclusions are required under Rule 21 for the
projects proposed to be added to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP); and
WHEREAS, the proposed amended list of projects to be funded by Transnet during
Fiscal Years 2008/2009 through 2012/2013 is consistent with the City's existing Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and the proposed changes to the CIP for Fiscal Year 2009/2010;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has held a noticed Public
Hearing on May 12, 2009, with an agenda item that clearly identified the proposed list of
projects prior to approval of the projects in accordance with by Section 5(A) of the Extension
Ordinance and Rule 7 of SANDAG Board Policy 31; and
WHEREAS, though all of the Capital Improvement Projects in the July 2009
Amendment to be sent to SANDAG and the associated SANDAG allocations are included on
Exhibit C, attached, only those listed on Exhibit A are to be addressed and approved through this
Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby:
1. Approves part B of the July 2009 Amendment to the Transnet Local Street
Improvement Program for submittal to the San Diego Association of
Governments for inclusion in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
for Fiscal Years 2008/2009 through 2012/2013. The specific projects and funding
included in part B of the July 2009 Amendment are shown on Exhibit A. The
City's proposed Major Pavement Rehabilitation projects are shown on Exhibit B.
2. Certifies pursuant to Section 2(C)(1) of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, no
more than 30 percent of its annual Transnet revenues shall be spent on
maintenance-related proj ects.
3. Certifies pursuant to Section 4(E)(3) of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, all new
projects, or major reconstruction projects, funded by Transnet revenues shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, and that any exception to the
requirement permitted under the Ordinance and proposed shall be clearly noticed
as part of the City ofChula Vista's public hearing process.
9-36
Resolution No. 2009-
Page 3
4. Certifies pursuant to Section 8 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, the required
minimum annual level of local discretionary funds to be expended for street and
road purposes will be met throughout the five-year period consistent with the
most recent Maintenance of Effort Requirements adopted by SANDAG.
5. Certifies pursuant to Section 9.A of the Extension Ordinance, the City will extract
at least $2,000 from the private sector for each newly constructed residential
housing unit to comply with the provisions of the Regional Transportation
Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP).
6. Certifies pursuant to Section 13 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, a separate
Transportation Improvement Account has been established for Transnet revenues,
with earned interest expended only for those purposes for which the funds were
allocated.
7. Certifies pursuant to Section 18 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, each project
of $250,000 or more will be clearly designated during construction with Transnet
project funding identification signs.
8. Indemnifies, holds harmless and defends SANDAG, the San Diego County
Regional Transportation Commission, and all officers and employees thereof
against all causes of action or claims related to local Transnet funded projects.
9. Certifies all applicable provisions of the Ordinance, the Extension Ordinance, and
SAl'lDAG Board Policy 31 have been met.
Presented by
Richard A. Hopkins
Director of Public Works
9-37
EXHIBIT A
TRANSNET ALLOCATION - FY 2010
-:~p ,.'~ ;':)3 ~':0 "~:'
;;;:MPo~iD'
.-!. ,~-'
G Street; F St. from Broadway to Hilltop
Pavement Major Rehabilitation Program (STL354): Fourth Ave.
from F to G SI.; F SI. from Broadway to Hilltop CHV48
TOTAL
Remaining Funds
Prepared 4/30/09
CD
I
(.,)
co
EXHIBIT B
RECOMMENDED OVERLA YS/ RECONSTRUCTS (CHV 48)
Street Name Be2innin2 Endin2
Location Location
.. . -~- .
FOl/RTH A V FST GST
.__._~_.__________'~'___"~_'~.~_'O'.~,..~_~.__._._"_~__._______~.>_____~_.......__,_."__~____,...___.~___"_~____
FST BROADWA Y HILL TOP DR
'...__._-~. _.
9-39
EXHIBIT C
TRANS NET ALLOCATION - FY 2010
CD
I
.~
C)
":'~'i~~;:i] "Z::iI ~~;,t~~,':~~(~~}:~~ :;~';l~~:~~i~!~~~~~;~~f~~~~;? :'{:;~~~f:\'[+~~~19.i<l.~:, ,,,,' . .,j~.Y.09/10l;;:j
;-:>.. ~~.. p~,.'::' .I.'If? ,
:'. MP'()IDi Old;! ran s rie.ti(~ash "9'gi1ge~ti~~j~el!~f- ,. Mamtenance .,'
. :....:" ..f';:"'''''' . ... .,."
Estimated Annual Allocation $3,120,000 $1,331,000
Bikeway Master Plan Update (STL351) CHV-NEW $50,000
Advance Planning Studies (OP202), (OP208) CHV22 $82,000
Emergency Storm Drain Repair (DR 180) CHV-NEW $1,200,000
N. Broadway Reconstruction (STM354) CHV19 $2,368,000
Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (STL291) CHV25 $235,000
1-805 Olympic Parkway Interchange Improvements (STM328) CHV01 $472,685
Pedestrian Master Plan (STL323) CHV26 $45,000
School Zone Traffic Calming Program (TF345, TF361) CHV33 $97,000 $130,000
Improvements CHV44 $90,000
Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements (STL303, 304, 305, 342) CHV-NEW $70,000
STL361 ) CHV-NEW $180,655
Naples and Oleander Cross Gutter (STL359) CHV-NEW $205,000
Pavement Major Rehabilitation Program (STL354) CHV48 $2,020,000
South Broadway Improvements South of Main SI. (STL356) CHV-NEW $500,000
Traffic Signal System Optimization (TF350) CHV39 $50,000
Pavement Rehabilitation Program (STL355) CHV06 $450,000
Neighborhood Traffic and Ped Safety (TF327, TF362) CHV34 $320,000
Traffic Monitoring Program (TF321 ,TF325) CHV45 $110,000
Congestion Relief Study and Implementation (TF354) CHV43 $70,000
Traffic Signing (TF332), Studies and Signal Upgrade (TF366) CHV35 $240,000
TOTAL $4,549,685 $3,115,655 $1,320,000
Remaining Funds $4,345 $11,000
Prepared 4/30109
EXHIBIT C
RECOMMENDED OVERLA YS/ RECONSTRUCTS (CHV 48)
Street Name
Beeinnine
Location
Endine
Location
BROADWAY FAIVRE ST BEYER BLVD
__________.__________....."..~._.....______..._____._"'~~~__N____'~___~_______,...__..._~.._~_~_~__.....~__
BROADWA Y MAIN ST FAIVRE ST
_._,~~~~_."_~____~,_._'_~,~______...._~____._~.._~__~N~"____,_,_,__, _
BROADWA Y ANITA ST MAIN ST
_.._.__..__._---~-_._--_._._-~_.~-------
BROADWAY DSTREET FSTREET
...__...,,______._~__...N"........__'N_._._..___.~"~h__N_' .~.__,~~'_"^.....N....._'.___.~_.__..____~____~.._.~..~__M__.~...,_~~_-...-..___
E ORANGE A V HILL TOP DR MELROSE A V
_~~b____".._._..'"__N__---.~_*_.,,_'.,...~_........~,'~..~_,_,~______.___.._
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
---~~-------_._-~_.__._~_. ----~ --..
MAIN ST ROMA CT MAXWELL RD
____N~'~~___~____.~,.."..,.~___...,__"._..~~__...._______"',__.__,_"__,__,,,___,,_,_,___,~,,,_,___.~__,,____,_~,'...___,____,__..__~~~._____
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP OLEANDER AV
'--~--~----'----'-~------
EASTLAKE PW OTAY LAKES RD GREENSGATE DR
- -
EASTLAKE PW CLUBHOUSE DR TRINIDAD COVE
--~-~-,-_._~-_."--_.__....-._,..~_._.,_._,-----~_.._-------_._-'"----_._~_.~---_._~-~-~-----------~--
MAIN ST OLEANDER A V DELNISO CT
---------~_..~--._---- - -
MAIN ST DELNISO CT ROMA CT
--~--~-~-_.._--------,-~-_._--~----------~~-_.~--
MAIN ST MAXWELL RD NIRVANA AV
_'~_h._~_..__~~~_'__ ~_~__~.....__~___.____ _
TELEGRAPH CANYON RD 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
-------~----------~.------_..
NAPLES ST MELROSE A V FOXBORO ST
'~_~_'__'_"~~_.~~'_,~~.,._.,_..,"-.'~'~'L,.__.____....._.__.___~_~_~_ ..___~___~,....._~,__,~..~,
MELROSE A V TELEGRAPH CANYON RD MAIN ST
_._----'---~,-_._~_._~-_.~_.--._-,-_.....~_....__.~,--_..._------~-
FOURTH A V F ST G ST
~~_._,--_.~------~-_---.-...."
FOURTHAV L ST ORANGEAV
~",_,~,_,~"~~,,."'''~W_'~_....~.~h~'_____'__'M~_''''_'''''__'_..__.__._.___,_,,__,_,,__~~ ___'.__'_'W__'~"'__'_____"_~_W~_______~'~__'~'__~__'.
F ST BROADWA Y HILL TOP DR
-_._----~._------......_-~_._-------~-_._-_-._.-
CST NGLOVERAV SECOND A V
------------- ----.------------.----.----------
GST BROADWAY FOURTHAVE
_..._~~~._-_.~_._....~,'...,-_._~...,..~..--,----,~.........~,~._-,._,-_.~.__._~~--.---.~,..~'._--;-- -~_._"._._-,._--~---_._~
L ST FOURTHAVE THIRD A V
----
9-41
RESOLUTION NO. 2009
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING PART C OF THE JULY 2009
AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSNET LOCAL STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE SAN
DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR
INCLUSION IN THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008/2009
THROUGH 2012/2013 AND PROVIDING CERTIFICATION
AND INDEMNITY STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN
TRANSNETFUNDS
WHEREAS, on November 3, 1987, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2004, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego County Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (Transnet
Extension Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, the Transnet Extension Ordinance provides that the San Diego Association
of Governments (SANDAG), acting as the Regional Transportation Commission, shall approve a
multi-year program of projects submitted by local jurisdictions identifying those transportation
projects eligible to use transportation sales tax (Transnet) funds; and
WHEREAS, in January 2009, the City of Chula Vista was provided with an estimate of
annual Transnet local street improvement revenues for fiscal years 2009 through 2013; and
WHEREAS, on March 18,2008, pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 3106 through 3110, the City
Council adopted the Western Chula Vista Transportation Development Fee (WTDIF) at a rate of
$3,243 per Equivalent Development Unit; and
WHEREAS, on January 25,2005, pursuant to Resolution No. 2005-014, the City Council
adopted the City's Bikeway Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, in January 2008, SANDAG staff acknowledged this Plan as complete,
consistent with the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan, and coordinated with other jurisdictions;
and
WHEREAS, Section 4.E.3 of the Extension Ordinance states that all new projects, or
major reconstruction projects, funded by revenues provided under this Ordinance shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, except where pedestrians and bicyclists are
prohibited by law from using a given facility or where the costs of including bikeways and
walkways would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use; and
9-42
Resolution No. 2009-
Page 2
WHEREAS, Rule 21 "Accommodation of Bicyclists and Pedestrians" was adopted by the
SANDAG Board on February 22, 2008, to provide a guide to appropriate accommodation
measures for various types of streets; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 21 Amendment states that a local jurisdiction may use a bicycle or
pedestrian master plan adopted by the city council and approved by SANDAG to determine the
appropriate means of accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians in a given project and at a
minimum provide the facilities called for in the plan; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that no exclusions are required under Rule 21 for the
projects proposed to be added to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP); and
WHEREAS, the proposed amended list of projects to be funded by Transnet during
Fiscal Years 2008/2009 through 201212013 is consistent with the City's existing Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and the proposed changes to the CIP for Fiscal Year 2009/2010;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has held a noticed Public
Hearing on May 12, 2009, with an agenda item that clearly identified the proposed list of
projects prior to approval of the projects in accordance with by Section 5(A) of the Extension
Ordinance and Rule 7 of SANDAG Board Policy 31; and
WHEREAS, although all of the Capital Improvement Projects in the July 2009
Amendment to be sent to SANDAG and the associated SANDAG allocations are included on
Exhibit C, attached, only those listed on Exhibit A are to be addressed and approved through this
Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby:
1. Approves part C of the July 2009 Amendment to the Transnet Local Street
Improvement Program for submittal to the San Diego Association of
Governments for inclusion in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
for Fiscal Years 2008/2009 through 2012/2013. The specific projects and funding
included in part C of the July 2009 Amendment are shown on Exhibit A. The
City's proposed Major Pavement Rehabilitation projects are shown on Exhibit B.
2. Certifies pursuant to Section 2(C)(1) of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, no
more than 30 percent of its annual Transnet revenues shall be spent on
maintenance-related projects.
3. Certifies pursuant to Section 4(E)(3) of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, all new
projects, or major reconstruction projects, funded by Transnet revenues shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, and that any exception to the
requirement permitted under the Ordinance and proposed shall be clearly noticed
as part of the City of Chula Vista's public hearing process.
9-43
Resolution No. 2009-
Page 3
4. Certifies pursuant to Section 8 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, the required
minimum annual level of local discretionary funds to be expended for street and
road purposes will be met throughout the five-year period consistent with the
most recent Maintenance of Effort Requirements adopted by SANDAG.
5. Certifies pursuant to Section 9.A of the Extension Ordinance, the City will extract
at least $2,000 from the private sector for each newly constructed residential
housing unit to comply with the provisions of the Regional Transportation
Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP).
6. Certifies pursuant to Section 13 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, a separate
Transportation Improvement Account has been established for Transnet revenues,
with earned interest expended only for those purposes for which the funds were
allocated.
7. Certifies pursuant to Section 18 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, each project
of $250,000 or more will be clearly designated during construction with Transnet
project funding identification signs.
8. Indemnifies, holds harmless and defends SANDAG, the San Diego County
Regional Transportation Commission, and all officers and employees thereof
against all causes of action or claims related to local Transnet funded projects.
9. Certifies all applicable provisions of the Ordinance, the Extension Ordinance, and
SANDAG Board Policy 31 have been met.
Presented by
Richard A. Hopkins
Director of Public Works
9-44
EXHIBIT A
TRANSNET ALLOCATION - FY 2010
'ct: -:'r~.;::'!<:;~~~~:
:"IM~O'ID'
'l'i.. ,," _, ,
1-805 Olympic Parkway Interchange Improvements (STM328) CHV01
Pavement Major Rehabilitation Program (STL354): Main St.
from west to east 1-805 ramp CHV48
Prepared 4130109
co
I
.j::o
en
EXHIBIT B
RECOMMENDED OVERLAYS/ RECONSTRUCTS (CHV48)
Street Name Beeinnine Endine
Location Location
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
_____~__.b_._,~__.,
9-46
EXHIBIT C
TRANSNET ALLOCATION - FY 2010
CD
I
.j:>.
-.l
;;; ',.:1;:' \.,~j:~.::..~~~,1~~;x2~{~~~~~1~~j~ei;,::~~~;1~i~'":!:~1.~;J~.'. . :'Y~./ .;;t'r~~ :.:!' , ,: '. '~1~il'~ff~~~~~ ~~~ \~ 'r,~,~ ~ ;Yil-ii; EY,09/1 O:i;~,~ g ~k,~AF.Y.~09/1O";. ;
',_"~',.,.-..,. -, ..+,_.-..,..;;....t,',..'~
Mp,0,\lp", Oldt-Ti"ansne'((Cash ;t;;Qng !ll!~iO: nV~,~1 i .~fl' /;~Maintenarice .
.'1.--' . ,', . ',''\r._
Estimated Annual Allocation $3,120,000 $1,331,000
Bikeway Master Plan Update (STL351) CHV-NEW $50,000
Advance Planning Studies (OP202), (OP208) CHV22 $82,000
Emergency Storm Drain Repair (DR180) CHV-NEW $1,200,000
N. Broadway Reconstruction (STM354) CHV19 $2,368,000
Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (STL291) CHV25 $235,000
1-805 Olympic Parkway Interchange Improvements (STM328) CHV01 $472,685
Pedestrian Master Plan (STL323) CHV26 $45,000
School Zone Traffic Calming Program (TF345, TF361) CHV33 $97,000 $130,000
Improvements CHV44 $90,000
Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements (STL303, 304, 305, 342) CHV-NEW $70,000
STL361) CHV-NEW $180,655
Naples and Oleander Cross Gutter (STL359) CHV-NEW $205,000
Pavement Major Rehabilitation Program (STL354) CHV48 $2,020,000
South Broadway Impr<lvements South of Main St. (STL356) CHV-NEW $500,000
Traffic Signal System Optimization (TF350) CHV39 $50,000
Pavement Rehabilitation Program (STL355) CHV06 $450,000
Neighborhood Traffic and Ped Safety (TF327, TF362) CHV34 $320,000
Traffic Monitoring Program (TF321 ,TF325) CHV45 $110,000
Congestion Relief Study and Implementation (TF354) CHV43 $70,000
Traffic Signing (TF332), Studies and Signal Upgrade (TF366) CHV35 $240,000
TOTAL $4,549,685 $3,115,655 $1,320,000
Remaining Funds $4,345 $11,000
Prepared 4/30/09
EXHIBIT C
RECOMMENDED OVERLAYS/RECONSTRUCTS (CHV 48)
Street Name Be2:innin2: Endin2:
Location Location
-". - .-.-..-
BROADWAY FAIVRE ST BEYER BLVD
~''''~~.~-~'--~'--~----''-'-~-''-~'-~--"'''~-'''''-''-'~-~--'~"-~'"'---'~~'-' "-~"~"'._~~'~""-"~---'~-~-"-"'-"'"-"'-""'--"--"-"""-*~~._-~-
BROADWA Y MAINST FAIVREST
-~._-_.~---..-----_."...~."--~-----,,._--~----_._._.....~..,."--'---'------.-"- ---------~-
BROADWA Y ANITA ST MAIN ST
----~._-_._,...~---_._-_..~
BROADWA Y DSTREET F STREET
---
E ORANGE A V HILL TOP DR MELROSE A V
__~.__"_u'_...,_~~__~_,~'._._,~~_w_._~.___...,__......__._____._____M'_...'.__...___._~__,___.__.... -~~---~_...~~
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
----,'-----..-.-~-,-"--"-,,---..-.,".-,-..---..-,~.~-.----~"--""--____"'________'.___.M________,____.__~_____
MAIN ST ROMA CT MAXWELL RD
------'~--~.~.._--~-~ -----._--_._-~_.._- --
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP OLEANDER AV
~----~-~~'---'-- -
EASTLAKE PW OTAY LAKES RD GREENSGA TE DR
- -
EASTLAKE PW CLUBHOUSE DR TRINIDAD COVE
------~-----~.,-,---_._-~_._._. ---~~'---_.~~._~-_._-_._--~~ ---~_._._-
MAINST OLEANDER A V DELNISO CT
-'_.._'---'-_._-~_._._---~-"-_.,_.-.......--..~-~---------..~._--~.-
MAIN ST DELNISO CT ROMA CT
-~-----~---------.._-----._-
MAIN ST MAXWELL RD NIRVANA AV
-------------.-- -
TELEGRAPH CANYON RD 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
-"--'.'~ ......~_._-----'---~._-,-~-~~._-~-._--_._._-~-----,.~---~~--
NAPLES ST MELROSE A V FOXBORO ST
---.----...------.---..--...-.......----.--.-.-...---..-.-.---.------.---.--------...---.-..----------.-.-..-
MELROSE A V TELEGRAPH CANYON RD MAIN ST
---.---...-----..-----.---.----..-.--..---------..-------.--.----------
FOURTHAV FST GST
_.~-------~._---~.---~._~~--~~_. .. .. --
FOURTH A V L ST ORANGE A V
~.~-_.__._--.--~-~. -~-----_., '-~------
FST BROADWA Y HILL TOP DR
~-_.~,._--'~-~-~..,~--~_.._--_..........._---_..__..~_._--~_.------~-----~._.._----_._----~~~~------",.,-----,.._-~~
CST NGLOVERAV SECOND A V
G sT'---~..-.--.-----------.----.--7ijioAjjWA Y---------..--.-.---;:o(jjjj-fi A -VE ...-.-..-------------
_.....__._._._._.~~_._.----~-,._----~._-_.__.~_.~--~-,------~~-------
L ST FOURTHAVE THIRD A V
9-48
RESOLUTION NO. 2009
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING PART D OF THE JULY 2009
N\1ENDMENT TO THE TRANSNET LOCAL STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SUB MITT AL TO THE SAN
DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR
INCLUSION IN THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008/2009
THROUGH 2012/2013 AND PROVIDING CERTIFICATION
AND INDEMNITY STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN
TRANSNETFUNDS
WHEREAS, on November 3, 1987, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2004, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego County Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (Transnet
Extension Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, the Transnet Extension Ordinance provides that the San Diego Association
of Governments (SANDAG), acting as the Regional Transportation Commission, shall approve a
multi-year program of projects submitted by local jurisdictions identifying those transportation
projects eligible to use transportation sales tax (Transnet) funds; and
WHEREAS, in January 2009, the City of Chula Vista was provided with an estimate of
annual Transnet local street improvement revenues for fiscal years 2009 through 2013; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2008, pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 3106 through 3110, the City
Council adopted the Western Chula Vista Transportation Development Fee (WTDIF) at a rate of
$3,243 per Equivalent Development Unit; and
WHEREAS, on January 25,2005, pursuant to Resolution No. 2005-014, the City Council
adopted the City's Bikeway Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, in January 2008, SANDAG staff acknowledged this Plan as complete,
consistent with the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan, and coordinated with other jurisdictions;
and
WHEREAS, Section 4.E.3 of the Extension Ordinance states that all new projects, or
major reconstruction projects, funded by revenues provided under this Ordinance shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, except where pedestrians and bicyclists are
prohibited by law from using a given facility or where the costs of including bikeways and
walkways would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use; and
9-49
Resolution No. 2009-
Page 2
WHEREAS, Rule 21 "Accommodation of Bicyclists and Pedestrians" was adopted by the
SANDAG Board on February 22, 2008, to provide a guide to appropriate accommodation
measures for various types of streets; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 21 Amendment.states that a local jurisdiction may use a bicycle or
pedestrian master plan adopted by the city council and approved by SANDAG to determine the
appropriate means of accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians in a given project and at a
minimum provide the facilities called for in the plan; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that no exclusions are required under Rule 21 for the
projects proposed to be added to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP); and
WHEREAS, the proposed amended list of projects to be funded by. Transnet during
Fiscal Years 2008/2009 through 2012/2013 is consistent with the City's existing Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and the proposed changes to the CIP for Fiscal Year 2009/2010;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has held a noticed Public
Hearing on May 12, 2009, with an agenda item that clearly identified the proposed list of
projects prior to approval of the projects in accordance with by Section 5(A) of the Extension
Ordinance and Rule 7 of SANDAG Board Policy 31; and
WHEREAS, though all of the Capital Improvement Projects in the July 2009
Amendment to be sent to SANDAG and the associated SANDAG allocations are included on
Exhibit C, attached, only those listed on Exhibit A are to be addressed and approved through this
Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby:
1. Approves part D of the July 2009 Amendment to the Transnet Local Street
Improvement Program for submittal to the San Diego Association of
Govemments for inclusion in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
for Fiscal Years 2008/2009 through 2012/2013. The specific projects and funding
included in part D of the July 2009 Amendment are shown on Exhibit A. The
City's proposed Major Pavement Rehabilitation projects are shown on Exhibit B.
2. Certifies pursuant to Section 2(C)(1) of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, no
more than 30 percent of its annual Transnet revenues shall be spent on
maintenance-related projects.
3. Certifies pursuant to Section 4(E)(3) of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, all new
projects, or major reconstruction projects, funded by Transnet revenues shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, and that any exception to the
requirement permitted under the Ordinance and proposed shall be clearly noticed
as part of the City of Chula Vista's public hearing process.
9-50
Resolution No. 2009-
Page 3
4. Certifies pursuant to Section 8 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, the required
minimum annual level of local discretionary funds to be expended for street and
road purposes will be met throughout the five-year period consistent with the
most recent Maintenance of Effort Requirements adopted by SANDAG.
5. Certifies pursuant to Section 9.A of the Extension Ordinance, the City will extract
at least $2,000 from the private sector for each newly constructed residential
housing unit to comply with the provisions of the Regional Transportation
Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP).
6. Certifies pursuant to Section 13 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, a separate
Transportation Improvement Account has been established for Transnet revenues,
with earned interest expended only for those purposes for which the funds were
allocated.
7. Certifies pursuant to Section 18 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, each project
of $250,000 or more will be clearly designated during construction with Transnet
project funding identification signs.
8. Indemnifies, holds harmless and defends SANDAG, the San Diego County
Regional Transportation Commission, and all officers and employees thereof
against all causes of action or claims related to local Transnet funded projects.
9. Certifies all applicable provisions of the Ordinance, the Extension Ordinance, and
SANDAG Board Policy 31 have been met.
Presented by
Richard A. Hopkins
Director of Public Works
9-51
EXHIBIT A
TRANSNET ALLOCATION - FY 2010
:;J~~~:~;:~~~ :~~.
!;;IVI~O;ID"
Estimated Annual Allocation
STL361) CHV-NEW
Pavement Major Rehabilitation Program (STL354): Fourth Ave.
from L SI. to Orange Ave. CHV48
Prepared 4/30/09
CD
I
U1
N
EXHIBIT B
RECOMMENDED OVERLA YS/ RECONSTRUCTS (CHV 48)
Street Name
Be2innin2
Location
Endin2
Location
FOl/RTHAV
L ST ORANGE A V
'~~--_--"'_""_____'_'_--""_~____~M
9-53
EXHIBIT C
TRANSNET ALLOCATION - FY 2010
&l~:'!i;i~;I~j~;~~%~:~~~ ~. "~i~~ ~~:{~}J ~J~~;,~~:;i~Jf(t~,:~~~~~~ ';14J::jVF,YIQ9(1.0~:;""1:1 '.;'!;;:.~F,Y,;09"1 0 '\
,11"':~' ").{ 1, .,.. '.'~~'-- _._,..,,~ ~ ~tM~~i~!~_h~I~~~~ ,~
;~:Mp;b..iD~ Qld7Trill'i~ n.~t~( ~~s h ~.~~ng~sti6iji~~I.iet,i
Estimated Annual Allocation $3,120,000 $1,331,000
Bikeway Master Plan Update (STL351) CHV-NEW $50,000
Advance Planning Studies (OP202), (OP208) CHV22 $82,000
Emergency Storm Drain Repair (DR180) CHV-NEW $1,200,000
N. Broadway Reconstruction (STM354) CHV19 $2,368,000
Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (STL291) CHV25 $235,000
1-805 Olympic Parkway Interchange Improvements (STM328) CHV01 $472,685
Pedestrian Master Plan (STL323) CHV26 $45,000
School Zone Traffic Calming Program (TF345, TF361) CHV33 $97,000 $130,000
Improvements CHV44 $90,000
Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements (STL303, 304, 305, 342) CHV-NEW $70,000
STL361) CHV-NEW $180,655
Naples and Oleander Cross Gutter (STL359) CHV-NEW $205,000
Pavement Major Rehabilitation Program (STL354) CHV48 $2,020,000
South Broadway Improvements South of Main St. (STL356) CHV-NEW $500,060
Traffic Signal System Optimization (TF350) CHV39 $50,000
Pavement Rehabilitation Program (STL355) CHV06 $450,000
Neighborhood Traffic and Ped Safety (TF327, TF362) CHV34 $320,000
Traffic Monitoring Program (TF321 ,TF325) CHV45 $110,000
Congestion Relief Study and Implementation (TF354) CHV43 $70,000
Traffic Signing (TF332), Studies and Signal Upgrade (TF366) CHV35 $240,000
TOTAL $4,549,685 $3,115,655 $1,320,000
Remaining Funds $4,345 $11,000
q-
LO
I
0)
Prepared 4/30/09
EXHIBIT C
..
RECOMMENDED OVERLAYS/RECONSTRUCTS (CHV 48)
Street Name Beginning Ending
Location Location
- .. ---.
BROADWAY FAIVRE ST BEYER BLVD
..__._~_._...__........~_.a___.~__.___.__...._~.__.___...______~............__ -"-"--
BROADWA Y MAIN ST FAIVRE ST --'-~-'-'~-~'._~-~-"""'''~.'~''^~~''.''-''''-'~_.'''''-~-'-''---''._'__A"'__~_'-""-"""'_'_"'_'._~__~_"""~~~M_"__"-""'-'_~_"~"__r.,_
BROADWA Y ANITA ST MAIN ST
,.----.._~___~..____________4__~.__~._. --~_.~_.
BROADWA Y D STREET F STREET
--. ..._~>_.._.~._...._~~-----_._-_._-_.~..~ ...-----~,~------'----~,
E ORANGE A V HILL TOP DR MELROSE A V
_.'~_._~""'____"'__"_'__""_'"__'''''~ _"..,.._.....".~~_'____~.L__,_''''_~__,__..__.,._.,....___....___,.._~____~___~.____........_.~___~_~ ~........',._".",..'."'-- .__.._
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
-~'-~~"---'-'--'------- ~----_._---~._------- ---
MAIN ST ROMA CT MAXWELL RD
~--_.~--------~.._--_.._----~---- ,--,-.-
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP OLEANDER AV
---- .~.--,._~~-_.".._--_._~~_._-,_.__._-- ~._- ----..-
EASTLAKE PW OT A Y LAKES RD GREENSGATE DR
_""_'__'~_'____'_~H_'_"..__~~_..______._~_~_~~_,____'___"___'_"~____'~___'.,,~_~_,_ ._----~,~._--,---"-
EASTLAKE PW CLUBHOUSE DR TRINIDAD COVE
----------~.._. -------_.~. ---~-----
MAIN ST OLEANDER A V DELNISO CT
- - -
MAIN ST DELNISO CT ROMA CT ~-~------~-'~~--~-"--'-~~'-"~"-'",-",~,---_._,---._-..-..._-~-_._-~~---~~~--_.____~___~,~~.._.~w_~~,.~,_,~_
MAIN ST MAXWELL RD NIRVANA AV
-------,-~ --- ~h___
TELEGRAPH CANYON RD 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
---
NAPLES ST MELROSE A V FOXBORO ST
~--_.------._._~.~~-~---------_..._-...._- ----_._-~--_.__._~---_.~....._-
MELROSE A V TELEGRAPH CANYON RD MAIN ST
-.--__.~~.~~.~_...~~_.~..__~_~.~'_",'.b_.._'__.~_~~_,. ._--- -.._.-.........."".~-,._,.._~,-
FOURTHAV FST GST
~ .._-------~ .----------
FOURTH A V L ST ORANGE A V
'---"'---~-~-_.-......-_-_.._--_..._- ._------~.~~
FST BROADWA Y HILL TOP DR
_.,~..-~>~~._....~"-..,,.~~---..~-~....--~~_..~"...~-_....~-~._~.,--~-"_._--._;.~-"~.~_._"._~--~._.~-~._---~.._-~-..,---._...'~~'.__.,.__._..._-
CST NGlOVERAV SECON/JAV
"'~~___M__~___"',,___,~__~_____~,_~_ ------------
GST BROADWAY FOURTH AVE
---~---------..- . ------~.-... -,
L ST FOURTH AVE THIRD A V
9-55
RESOLUTION NO. 2009
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING PART E OF THE JULY 2009
AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSNET LOCAL STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE SAN
DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR
INCLUSION IN THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008/2009
THROUGH 2012/2013 AND PROVIDING CERTIFICATION
AND INDEMNITY STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN
TRANSNETFUNDS
WHEREAS, on November 3, 1987, the' voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2004, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego County Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (Transnet
Extension Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, the Transnet Extension Ordinance provides that the San Diego Association
of Governments (SANDAG), acting as the Regional Transportation Commission, shall approve a
multi-year program of projects submitted by local jurisdictions identifying those transportation
projects eligible to use transportation sales tax (Trans net) funds; and
WHEREAS, in January 2009, the City of Chula Vista was provided with an estimate of
annual Transnet local street improvement revenues for fiscal years 2009 through 2013; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2008, pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 3106 through 3110, the City
Council adopted the Western Chula Vista Transportation Development Fee (WTDIF) at a rate of
$3,243 per Equivalent Development Unit; and
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2005, pursuant to Resolution No. 2005-014, the City Council
adopted the City's Bikeway Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, in January 2008, SANDAG staff acknowledged this Plan as complete,
consistent with the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan, and coordinated with other jurisdictions;
and
WHEREAS, Section 4.E.3 of the Extension Ordinance states that all new projects, or
major reconstruction projects, funded by revenues provided under this Ordinance shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, except where pedestrians and bicyclists are
prohibited by law from using a given facility or where the costs of including bikeways and
walkways would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use; and
9-56
Resolution No. 2009-
Page 2
WHEREAS, Rule 21 "Accommodation of Bicyclists and Pedestrians" was adopted by the
SANDAG Board on February 22, 2008, to provide a guide to appropriate accommodation
measures for various types of streets; and
WHEREAS, the Rule 21 Amendment states that a local jurisdiction may use a bicycle or
pedestrian master plan adopted by the city council and approved by SANDAG to determine the
appropriate means of accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians in a given project and at a
minimum provide the facilities called for in the plan; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that no exclusions are required under Rule 21 for the
projects proposed to be added to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP); and
WHEREAS, the proposed amended list of projects to be funded by Transnet during
Fiscal Years 2008/2009 through 2012/2013 is consistent with the City's existing Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and the proposed changes to the CIP for Fiscal Year 2009/2010;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has held a noticed Public
Hearing on May 12, 2009, with an agenda item that clearly identified the proposed list of
projects prior to approval of the projects in accordance with by Section SeA) of the Extension
Ordinance and Rule 7 of SANDAG Board Policy 31; and
WHEREAS, though all of the Capital Improvement Projects in the July 2009
Amendment to be sent to SANDAG and the associated SANDAG allocations are included on
Exhibit C, attached, only those listed on Exhibit A are to be addressed and approved through this
Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby:
1. Approves part E of the July 2009 Amendment to the Transnet Local Street
Improvement Program for submittal to the San Diego Association of
Governments for inclusion in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
for Fiscal Years 2008/2009 through 2012/2013. The specific projects and funding
included in part E of the July 2009 Amendment are shown on Exhibit A.
2. Certifies pursuant to Section 2(C)(1) of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, no
more than 30 percent of its annual Transnet revenues shall be spent on
maintenance-related projects.
3. Certifies pursuant to Section 4(E)(3) of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, all new
projects, or major reconstruction projects, funded by Transnet revenues shall
accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, and that any exception to the
requirement permitted under the Ordinance and proposed shall be clearly noticed
as part of the City ofChula Vista's public hearing process.
9-57
Resolution No. 2009-
Page 3
4. Certifies pursuant to Section 8 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, the required
minimum annual level of local discretionary funds to be expended for street and
road purposes will be met throughout the five-year period consistent with the
most recent Maintenance of Effort Requirements adopted by SANDAG.
5. Certifies pursuant to Section 9.A of the Extension Ordinance, the City will extract
at least $2,000 from the private sector for each newly constructed residential
housing unit to comply with the provisions of the Regional Transportation
Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP).
6. Certifies pursuant to Section 13 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, a separate
Transportation Improvement Account has been established for Transnet revenues,
with earned interest expended only for those purposes for which the funds were
allocated.
7. Certifies pursuant to Section 18 of the Transnet Extension Ordinance, each project
of $250,000 or more will be clearly designated during construction with Transnet
project funding identification signs.
8. Indemnifies, holds harmless and defends SANDAG, the San Diego County
Regional Transportation Commission, and all officers and employees thereof
against all causes of action or claims related to local Transnet funded projects.
9. Certifies all applicable provisions of the Ordinance, the Extension Ordinance, and
SANDAG Board Policy 31 have been met.
Presented by
Richard A. Hopkins
Director of Public Works
9-58
EXHIBIT A
TRANSNET ALLOCATION - FY 2010
Estimated Annual Allocation
1-805, SR54 and Otay Mesa Transportation System
Improvements (TF344)
TOTAL
CHV44
Remaining Funds
Prepared 4/30/09
0>
LO
I
0>
EXHIBIT C
TRANSNET ALLOCATION - FY 2010
Bikeway Master Plan Update (STL351)
Advance Planning Studies (OP202), (OP208)
Emergency Storm Drain Repair (DR180)
N. Broadway Reconstruction (STM354)
Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (STL291)
1-805 Olympic Parkway Interchange Improvements (STM328)
Pedestrian Master Plan (STL323)
School Zone Traffic Calming Program (TF345, TF361)
Improvements
Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements (STL303, 304, 305, 342)
STL361)
Naples and Oleander Cross Gutter (STL359)
Pavement Major Rehabilitation Program (STL354)
South Broadway Improvements South of Main Sl. (STL356)
Traffic Signal System Optimization (TF350)
Pavement Rehabilitation Program (STL355)
Neighborhood Traffic and Ped Safety (TF327, TF362)
Traffic Monitoring Program (TF321 ,TF325)
Congestion Relief Study and Implementation (TF354)
Traffic Signing (TF332), Studies and Signal Upgrade (TF366) .
TOTAL
Remaining Funds
Prepared 4/30/09
T ~~~{1)~ijt'~~j:~1\ii ~tX~~:;;,~_F.~Y;:.~~('JR~~:e~ ?,t~,)~ .t~)'~g~~!~~i~~,1tf
.~l:~ns~llrf(cii~fi '.\.<::))ng'e~tloK~e!i~!~ ~~ryI~iD!en'ari:ge"}
$3,120,000 $1,331,000
CHV-NEW $50,000
CHV22 $82,000.
CHV-NEW $1,200,000
CHV19 $2,368,000
CHV25 $235,000
CHV01 $472,685
CHV26 $45,000
CHV33 $97,000 $130,000
CHV44 $90,000
CHV-NEW $70,000
CHV-NEW $180,655
CHV-NEW $205,000
CHV48 $2,020,000
CHV-NEW $500,000
CHV39 $50,000
CHV06 $450,000
CHV34 $320,000
CHV45 $110,000
CHV43 $70,000
CHV35 $240,000
$4,549,685 $3,115,655 $1,320,000
$4,345 $11,000
o
to
I
0>
EXHIBIT C
RECOMMENDED OVERLAYS/RECONSTRUCTS (CHV48)
Street Name Beginning Ending
Location Location
-- .. ----- -- --.. .'-..-. _.- .'._-
BROADWAY FAIVRE ST BEYER BLVD
~___._,_._~,~._____"-...,""...."....._...~._~N'''~k~~''''"'''''''~'"''_.._..._.A_.._;__.___.......___,'~,_,...~,_,~,________"..__.__.~______~~.~_~,_"_____
BROADWA Y MAIN ST FAIVRE ST
--------_.._-~----.--_...._-~---~-- -
BROADWA Y ANITA ST MAIN ST
_~____,__~._.__".,~_,___._____~_4_~.____~_~..____.__.~--'-_______~~_~__
BROADWA Y o STREET F STREET
.__.~__~,_~____~-'-~--......__~~_..._~___.__.____.,__-..-._~____~__'_.A__~.______...~__.~_~___w.______..__.=".__
E ORANGE A V HILL TOP OR MELROSE A V
___.._.__..~____~._M_..___.-..---_
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
.___,~~__._.~._........______~w__.___~_._______.__~__.__'__ ---_._~-
MAIN ST ROMA CT MAXWELL RD
.----..----- . -~- - -- --
MAIN ST 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP OLEANDER AV
~--~._-~---_.._---_.~.- ---
EASTLAKE PW OT A Y LAKES RD GREENSGA TE DR
-_._.,----_.__._.----....~,.__._,-~---_.,--_._._,._-,----._-~----_.~_._----"'---,-_._-~--_..- ~_...""'--~_.._--~..-
EASTLAKE PW CLUBHOUSE OR TRINIDAD COVE
-----.------ --
MAIN ST OLEANDER A V DELNISO CT
--_._~~.__._--~-,---'"--~--......----'~-_._------".._----_..~~
MAIN ST DELNISO CT ROMA CT
-~--~~ . ._-------~~~---~.--.
MAIN ST MAXWELL RD NIRVANAAV
---- .~_._-
TELEGRAPH CANYON RD 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP 1-805 FREEWAY RAMP
L ._.__~~._,~.__'.______...___._"___.,,.~~_~..~.'...~_.__".__"""_______'~__N__...~_..._~,'_____~____~__~___~..____
NAPLESST MELROSEAV FOXBOROST
-~----~----~~._- ---~-
MELROSE A V TELEGRAPH CANYON RD MAIN ST
_...__._~_.__..'~w,..~._~_M.__~..._.._.._.~_.___.q__._~.___~_._~________________.___.~~___~~_~.._._
FOURTHAV FST GST
__'....__d_.~~'_________O_____"_.~___.._".__,.,_.~.~~_._____~,.___._ ______...__...........'__.____~".~__,____."'._..~__..__.~.~_._.
FOURTHAV L ST ORANGEAV
_~_.__.___.~,q___~~~__H_"____.____.__~. --
F ST BROADWA Y HILL TOP OR
--------...------.----,-.---------.---,,-----....-."'-----------.-----..-------.------------.-----..--------.
CST NGLOVERAV SECOND A V
_____________~6_____._________'______~._ ..__4___~.____=__._~__
GST BROAOWAY FOURTH AVE
-_._~--_...._._>~_..__._--_...~---. .--.-----
L ST FOURTH AVE THIRD A V
9-61