HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009/04/28 Item 8
CITY COUNCIL
AGIENDA STATEMENT
~\~ C1lYOF
. ~-CHULA VISTA
ITEM TITLE: .
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
4/28/09, Item~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT
APPLICATION Al'ID CERTIFYING MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE I
STREET SIDEWALK INIPROVEMENTS MID APPROVING THE
SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE BIKEWAY
MASTER PLAl~ UPDATE TO THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERi'iJ.\;1ENTS (SA0iTIAG) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-10
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) AND
TRANSNET FUNDING FOR BICYCLE A1'ID PEDESTRIAl~
PROJECTS J'\ Jl
DIRECTOR OF PUB I WO~~ IP'"
CITY MANA
ASSIST Al~T CITY,
4/5THS VOTE: YES. D NO [g]
. SUMMARY
The Transportation Development Act (IDA) and the TransNet Program provide funding support for
regional bicycle and pedestrian capital improvement projects. A Council Resolution approving
grant applications is required by the San Diego Association of Governments (SAl'IDAG).
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a
"Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because the proposed
action seeks only to approve the submittal of a grant application with no guarantee of funding.
This action does not seek to approve the implementation of any project Subsequent to funding
being procured, additional environmental review will be conducted and the appropriate
environmental determination will be made. Therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the
State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is
necessary at this time.
RECOMMENDATION
Council adopt the resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Not applicable
8-1
4/28/09, Item~
Page 2 of 3
DISCUSSION
The State Transportation Development Act (TDA) and TransNet programs usually. provide
funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects through a competitive grant process on an annual
basis. These programs are administered through the San Diego Association of Governments
(SAl'illAG). SANDAG issued a call for projects on April S, 2009 with a submittal deadline of
May 6, 2009. The City is eligible to compete for funding annually for bicycle and pedestrian
projects under the following programs:
Transportation Development Act (TDA): This fund provides support for the region's public
transit and non-motorized transportation projects, including sidewalk and bicycle lane
improvements. The revenue comes from Y4 %' of the Sv. % retail sales tax collected statewide
and distributed by county. Each year, SANDAG is. locally responsible for the allocation of TDA
funds in conformance with legislative and region-wide priorities.
TransNet: The TransNet extension ordinance, approved by San Diego County voters in
November 2006, allocates two percent of the total annual revenues from the Y2 % retail sales tax
to the Bicycle, Pedestrian and Neighborhood Safety Program. This program is to provide
funding for bikeway facilities and connectivity improvements, pedestrian and walkable
community projects, bicycle and pedestrian safety projects and programs, and traffic calming
projects. These funds are intended to match Federal, State local and private funding sources.
SANDAG's call for projects included a copy of the revised Bicycle and Pedestrian Claim
Guidelines (see Attachment 1), which are used to administer this program.
City of Chula Vista Applications for FY 2009-10
Each year, the City participates in the Claim process for TDA and TransNet bicycle and
pedestrian project funds by submitting an updated list of projects to SANDAG. The selection
criteria support the overall goals and objectives SANDAG has for improving the regional
transportation system and promoting smart growth in the region by giving priority to projects
that enhance the existing transportation network as a whole. The criteria also give priority to
projects that have local matching funds and are ready to constnlCt. The criteria to be used in the
evaluation process are specified in the Project Selection Criteria matrix for each project (see
Attachment 2).
For FY 2009-10, it is recommended that the City apply for funding for the following proposed
projects, which are further detailed in the grant application p'rovided in Attachment B.
1. Sidewalk (Installation) Safetv Program, I Street Sidewalk Improvements: This project is
included as STL-336 in the City's FY2007-0S Capital Improvement Program as part of
the Sidewalk (Installation) Safety Program. This. project will install sidewalk
improvements on the north side of IStreet between Hilltop Drive and First Avenue. It
will complete the missing improvements within V. mile of Hilltop Drive Elementary
School, and within Y2 mile of Hilltop High School.
Under SANDAG's Bicycle and Pedestrian Claim regulations, only the sidewalk and
pedestrian ramp improvements are eligible for TDA funding. Driveway aprons are
funded by TDA only for the sidewalk portion crossing the apron. The total cost of the
project is $232,440. The scope of work for this project includes installation of Portland
8-2
4/28/09, Item~
Page 3 of3
Cement Concrete (PCC) sidewalks, PCC driveways, pedestrian ramps, retaining wall and
other miscellaneous items of work. The application request for TDA funds is $116,220.
TransNet funding for the Sidewalk Safety Program has already been appropriated under
CIP projects STL336 and STL347 and will be used to provide the $116,220 match.
2. Bikeway Master Plan Update: The purpose of the Bikeway Master Plan Update is to
review and make recommendations on how the current City bikeway network can be.
updated to best suit the needs of the City in the future: To be eligible for TDA funding
for bicycle projects, SAi"IDAG Claim Guidelines requires that the City have a SAt"IDAG
approved comprehensive bicycle facilities plan (updated at least once every five years).
The plan must emphasize bicycle projects that primarily accommodate non-recreational
bicycle trips. The total application request is $150,000. The funding is anticipated to be
provided on a non-competitive basis, and matching funds:are not necessary.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT
Sidewalk Safetv Program: Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has
found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property that is the subject of
this action.
Bikewav Master Plan Update: Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and
has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California
Code of Regulations section 18704.2(a)(1) is not applicable to this decision.
FISCAL IMPACT
Current Year Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. . Potential revenue to the City from TDA would be
$266,220. The actual amount is dependent upon which projects are approved for funding by the
SAt"IDAG Board of Directors: This resolution approves the submittal of the applications, and.
does not formally approve the implementation ofthe projects. There are sufficient funds in STL-
336 and STL-347 to provide the $116,220 in matching funds from TransNet for the I Street
Sidewalk Project. .
Ongoing Fiscal Impact
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. SANDAG's "Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines"
2. Grant Applications for Transportation Development Act/ TransNet Bicycle and
Pedestrian Projects
Prepared by: Elizabeth Chopp. Senior Civil Engineer. Public Works Departmenr.
tvl :IEngineerIAGENDA ICAS2009\04-28-09\FY20 I 0 TDA Funding Applications-Fina\.doc
8-3
Attachment 1
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CLAIM GUIDELINES
Introduction
The following describes the claim process for Transportation Development Act (TDA) Bicycle and
Pedestrian Projects and TransNet Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Neighborhood Safety Projects.
TDA Project Eligibility
The law specifies that funds should be allocated according to the regulations adopted by SANDAG as the
regional transportation planning agency. It also identifies certain categories of eligible projects. These
. specific project types represent neither an exhaustive list nor are they listed as priorities (Public Utilities
Code [PUC] Sections 99233.3 and 99234). They are summarized below for reference. Project evaluation
criteria, established by SANDAG Board policy, are discussed later.
. Construction, including related engineering expenses, of bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
. Maintenance of bicycle trails provided they are closed to motorized traffic.
. Projects serving the needs of commuting bicyclists, including but not limited to, new paths serving
major transportation corridors, secure bicycle parking at employment centers,
park-and-ride lots, and transit centers where other funds are not available.
o A comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian facilities plan (no more than once every five years), with
an emphasis on bicycle projects intended to primarily accommodate non-recreational bicycle trips.
o Up to 20 percent of the cost to restripe Class II bicycle lanes.
o Up to 5 percent of the amount available to a city or the county may be expended in conjunction with
other funds to support bicycle safety education programs, so long as the funds are not used to fully
fund the salary of anyone person.
TransNet Project Eligibility
TransNet bicycle, pedestrian, and neighborhood safety funds may' be expended for all purposes
necessary and convenient to the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of facilities intended
for use by bicyclists, pedestrians, and neighborhood safety/traffic calming projects. These funds also may
be used for programs that help to encourage bicycling and walking, such as secure parking facilities,
bicycle/pedestrian promotion programs, and safety programs.
. Certain costs at times associated with bicycle and pedestrian projects are not eligible when the benefit
provided is not the exclusive use of bicyclists or pedestrians. These instances are listed below.
. Curb and gutter are part of the roadway drainage system. As such, newly installed curb and gutter
cannot be considered an improvement exclusively for the benefit of the sidewalk or bike lane and
are not an eligible expense.
3
8-4
. Driveway ramps installed across sidewalks are not for the benefit of pedestrians, and in fact,
degrade the pedestrian environment. Claimants may not include the cost of driveway ramps in
applications for sidewalk projects. However, the distance across the driveway may be included
when computing the per-squarecfoot cost of the sidewalk.
. Where roadway design standards require a roadway shoulder width at least as wide as would be
required for a standard bike lane, the cost of the shoulder construction will not be eligible.
Appropriate bikeway signage is eligible.
. Under some circumstances, it may be necessary to remove and replace curb and gutter, driveway ramps,
drainage facilities, and other existing improvements in order to construct a bikeway or sidewalk. In such
cases the cost of this work is most likely eligible, but claimants should carefully document why this is so in
the claim submittal.
SANDAG Claim Requirements
SANDAG has the authority to. establish criteria applicable to analyzing and evaluating claims for non-
motorized transportation facilities (PUC Section 99401). To be considered for funding, a claim must be
consistent with the SANDAG-adopted non-motorized plans and meet the requirements for community
support and geometric design standards, as described in Categories 1 and 2 of the Project Evaluation
Criteria. In addition, the following requirements must be met, if applicaple:
· If the project abuts other jurisdictions, it must be shown on the adopted plans of the adjacent
jurisdictions, or a letter must be submitted from the abutting jurisdiction showing that cooperative
efforts are underway.
. Other sources of funding for cooperative projects must be identified. Please attach supporting
documentation that shows matching funds have been secured. Matching funds that have not been
secured will not be considered in the matching funds section of the project scoring matrix.
. Projects which are a required element of a larger capital improvement project are not eligible for
funding.
· . No single agency may submit an application, or applications, that are greater than the total
available allocation for that fiscal year.
Application Process
Applications for TDA and TransNet non-motorized claims must be received by SANDAG by May 6, 2009.
To be considered for funding, the Annual Grant Application must be fully completed. In addition, please
consider the following, if applicable:
. All claims, including those supporting educational or promotional programs and claims for planning
projects, must include a project budget, work program, and project schedule.
. No later than May 20, 2009, include a certified copy of a resolution or minute order in which the
planning group, planning commission, or governing body of the claimant authorizes the claim.
4
8-5
. Review Panel. A review panel of six to eight working group members will conduct a full preliminary
review of the project applications to identify significant issues and request clarification from the
project applicants, if necessary. Participation on the review panel is open to any active working
group member. Applicants must submit multiple hard copies of their applications for distribution to
the review panel.
. Completed applications will be made available online. Applicants must submit their application in
PDF format as well as hard copy. Electrooic version of the applications will be posted to the internet
to give any working group member the opportunity to review the applications.
Evaluation Process
The evaluation process for TDA bicycle and ped('strian projects and TransNet bicycle, pedestrian, and
neighborhood safety projects is consistent with the way SANDAG evaluates and prioritiZes other
components of the transportation system, such as arterial, highway, and transit projects. Transportation
project priorities are established in planning documents like the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).
Priorities also are used for funding decisions that are programmed in the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program (RTIP). In addition, the evaluation criteria supports the overall goals and objectives
SANDAG has for improving the regional transportation system and promoting smart growth in the region
by giving priority to projects that enhance the existing transportation network as a whole. The criteria to
be used in the evaluation process are specified in the Project Evaluation Criteria matrix.
Claimants for TDA bicycle and pedestrian projects and TransNet bicycle, pedestrian, and neighborhood
safety projects will be responsible for accurately filling out the Annual Grant Application and the
accompanying Project Evaluation Criteria Matrix. SANDAG will be responsible for performing the
Geographic Information System (GIS) Analysis in Category 6 and the Cost Benefit Analysis in Category
11 of the Project Evaluation Criteria based on the process outlined below. SANDAG will compile the
results from the Grant Applications and produce a prioritized list of projects that will be reviewed by the
Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group (BPWG). The committee then will recommend a final priority list of
projects to the Transportation Committee, which will then be approved by the Board of Directors.
a
Regional Housing Needs Incentive. To qualify for funding from this program the applicant must
meet the eligibility criteria prescribed in Section 4 of "Implementation Guidelines for SANDAG
Regional Housing Needs Assessment Memorandum" from Board Policy No. 033. Points will be
awarded based on the "Description of How to Calculate the Board Policy No. 033 Incentive Points"
detailed in Attachment 5 of the Policy.
a
The GIS Analysis will be based on the following five factors: total population, total employment,
population density, employment density, and nymber of activity centers. Using the project limits
provided by the claimant, SANDAG will perform the GIS Analysis using data for population and
employment forecasts for 2015. A buffer will be created around each project area. Pedestrian
projects will be given a half-mile buffer and bicycle projects will be given a one-mile buffer. The
buffered areas will be used along with the population and employment data to generate population
and employment densities. The number of Activity Centers, as identified by the SANDAG data
warehouse, will be identified and tallied. Each factor will be scored from one to four points, for a
possible total of 20 points for the GIS Analysis category. Projects will be scored in each category
relative to each other by taking the raw scores and distributing them from highest to lowest. The
5
8-6
highest 25 percent will receive four points, the second highest quartile will receive three points, the
third highest quartile will receive two points, and the lowest quartile will receive one point.
The Cost Benefit Analysis will be computed by taking the subtotal score from
Categories 1 through 8 on the Project Evaluation Criteria matrix and dividing that subtotal by the
grant application amount. Projects will be scored relative to each other by taking the raw scores
and distributing them from highest to lowest, with the project with the highest cost benefit ratio
receiving 15 points and the project with the lowest cost benefit ratio receiving one point.
6
8-7
Attachment 2
FY 2010 Annual Grant Application
Transportation Development ActlTransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista
Project Name: Bikeway Master Plan Update
Application Amount: $150,000
Project Type: Bikeway Plan
Project limits: nfa
Project Description: Bikeway Master Plan Update. The objective of the Bikeway Master Plan
is to review and make recommendations on how the current bikeway network within the
City can be updated to best suit the needs of the City in the future.
Summary oi Cost Estimates:
Cateqorv
Feasibility Study (Plan by Consultant)
Engineering
Project Management
Contract Engineering
Environmental Documentation
Design
Construction (Prepare Plan)
Construction Management
Construction Contract
Cost
$25,000
$125,000
$ 150,000
Total Cost
Revenue Source
TDNTransNet Claim Amount
Amount
$150,000
Funding Sources:
Total $ 150,000
8":"("""'8
Project Location Map:
Contact Person: Roberto Solorzano
Title: Associate Engineer
Address 276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California
Phone: (619) 409-5420
Fax:
(619) 691-5171
E-mail: solo(a)cLchula-vista.ca.us
Person Authorized to Submit Application:
I certify that I have reviewed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines and the information
submitted in this application is accurate and in accordance with these guidelines.
Elizabeth Chopp Senior Civil Engineer
Title
Date
8-e9
Proiect Fundinq:
Total Estimated Project Cost (Please attach a detailed
project estimate based on best available engineering)
$
150,000
Project Cost Estimates -On a separate sheet provide an itemized cost estimate for all eligible
expenses. Be as accurate 'as possible to avoid future cost overruns. Projects with cost overruns
have three options for moving the project forward depending on what percentage over the original
grant amount the revised project cost will be. Applicants may ask for a recommendation from the
BPWG to amend original allocation for up to five percent of the original cost estimate (up to the
amount available in the reserve). Projects that require more than five percent additional funding
can resubmit the project in a subsequent funding cycle with the adjusted project amount. Lastly,
the applicants can choose to complete the project with t'leir.own funding.
Matching Funds (Category 9 of Project Evaluation Criteria)
Revenue Source
Amount
$
$
Total $
TDAlTransNet (Application Amount as shown
in Category 10 of Project Evaluation Criteria)
$
150,000
Total Revenues
$150,000
Scope of Work
In the section below, state the project deliverables (including specific quantities and locations of
improvements) and anticipated completion dates. Please note that if this project is funded, this
scope of work will be added to the grant agreement and the grantee will be held to this scope of
work for the purpose of project oversight.
Deliverables Completion
Date
Award of contract by City Council to the selected Consultant December 2009
Draft Bikeway Master Plan Update August 2010
Final Bikeway Master Plan Update November 201'0
8-g 0
Succortlnq Materials
A. Community SUDDorJConsistencv with Community Plan (Cateqorv 1) - The councilor
governing board of the applicant must authorize this grant application. Please attach a copy
of the resolution or minute order documenting that action. Or, if the project is part of an
approved Bicycle Plan, please attach a copy of the section that includes the project.
To be eligible for TDA funding, SANDAG Claim Guidelines' requires that for bicycle.
projects, the City must have an approved comprehensive bicycle facilities plan
(updated once every five years). The plan must emphasize bicycle projects that
primarily accommodate non-recreational bicycle trips. The current Bikeway Master
Plan was approved by Council Resolution on January 25, 2005. This project will be
included in the Chula Vista's upcoming CIP Program. A certified copy of the Chula
Vista Council resolution authorizing the application will be submitted by May 20, 2009.
B. Minimum DesiGn Standards (Cateqorv 2) - Projects applying for construction funds must
piovide actual drawings. or cross-sections from the project itself, not generic standard
drawings. If the applicant is seeking funding for the design and construction of a project,
proposed cross-sections may be used in lieu of the actual plan drawings. If any part of a
project is substaridard, clearly illustrate that (provide photographs, if applicable) and provide
an explanation as to why the minimum design standard is not being met.
C. Connect to ReGional Transportation Corridor or Transit linkaGe or ReGional Bikewav Map
(CateGorv 3) - Provide a map which clearly illustrates the projects relationship to existing
facilities. Show the project's direct linkages to any regional bikeway (for bicycle projects) or
direct continuous link to a local bus stop or direct link to an LRT/regional transit station. A
direct link for a bicycle project is defined. as connecting immediately to a regional bikeway
with no gaps. A direct link between a pedestrian project and a transit facility is defined as one.
in which some part of the facility comes within 600 feet of a local bus stop or LRT/regional
transit station.
D. Completes Connection/linkaGe in ExistinG Bicvcle/Pedestrian Network (CateGorv 4) - List
and briefly describe the linkages or. connections to existing bicycle. or pedestrian network.
Provide amap which clearly illustrates the projects relationship to existing facilities.
8-fb1
F. Geoaraohic Factors/GIS Analvsis (Cateoorv 6) - SANDAG will perform a GIS analysis as
described in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines based upon a project map
provided by the applicant. Briefly describe project limits and provide a location map clearly
showing the project alignment. In addition, clearly show and label the following elements:
a. major traffic generators within the project area (within Yo-mile for pedestrian
projects and within 1-niile for bicycle projects)
b. linkage or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities
c. linkage to any regional bikeway or public transit stop
G. Geoaraphic Factors/GIS Analvsis (Cateaorv 6) - List and briefly describe major traffic
generators served by the project.
H. Safetv Improvements (Cateaorv 7) :- Describe the safety issues addressed by the project.
Please attach support documentation for safety and accident history. If collision data is
provided, it must be specific in pointing out which collisions are applicable -to the project and
why it is relevant.
I. Innovation and Desian (Cateaorv 8) - Describe any design innovations for bicycle/pedestrian
priority measures .that are included within the project limits.
Is this project in your agency's adopted capital improvement program (Y/N) N
This project will be included in the upcoming Chula Vista CIP Program for Fiscal
Year 2009-10.
If the project is part of a larger capital improvement project, briefly discuss how the bicycle or
pedestrian project costs were identified and a description of the other sources of funds for the
overall project.
Briefly describe any other aspects of the project that is relevant to its evaluation.
8 :-1112
Bicycle Master Plans. Pedestrian Master. Plans. Education/Safety Proqrams and Bicycle
Parkinq
Bicycle Master Plans, Education/Safety Programs and Bicycle Parking projects will each be
considered in a separate category. These types of projects are encouraged and will be evaluated
by SANDAG staff.
Basic Guidelines
Bicycle Master Plans - Cities with population up to 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of
$75,000. Cities with population greater than 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $150,000.
Beginning with the 2010 project application cycle, all cities will need to have a SANDAG-
approved Bicycle Plan to be eligible for TDAfTransNet funds for individual projects.
Pedestrian Master Plans '- An agency may submit an application for a pedestrian master plan no
more frequently than once every five years. Jurisdictions with a population over 150,000 may
submit applications for up to $150,000, and jurisdictions with a population under 150,000 may
submit applications up to $100,000. In either case, the amount of the application must be
substantiated by providing a scope of work and project budget to SANDAG.
Education/Safety Programs - An agency must submit a scope of work and a proposed schedule
to be evaluated by SANDAG staff.
Bicycle Parking - Projects that conform to SANDAG's Bicycle Parking Guidelines and have a
projected cost up to $50,000 will be eligible.
. All claims, including those supporting educational or promotional programs and claims for
planning projects, must include a project budget, work program, and project schedule.
8 ""1123
City of Chula Vista
rublic Works I EngineeringDe(lurtment I Infrastructnre I'J"nning
Bikeway Master Plan Update
Preliminary Engineering (RFP)
2 Advertise RFP
G Begin Plan Ufldate
l=1 Project Com letion
June-09
June-09
December-09 December-lO
December-lO December-lO
00
I
-"
.J::o.
February-09
Attachment 2
FY 2010 Annual Grant Application
Transportation Development ActlTransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects .
Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista
Project Name: Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements
Application Amount: $116,220
Project Type: Pedestrian Improvements
Projec(Limits: North Side of I Street, from Hilltop Drive to First Avenue
Project Description: Installation of ADA sidewalks, driveways, and pedestrian ramps in
order to complete the missing pedestrian infrastructure.
Summary of Cost Estimates:
CateQorv
Cost
Feasibility Study
Engineering
Project Management
Contract Engineering
Environmental Documentation
Design
Construction
Construction Management
Construction Contract
$875
$875
$12,250
Total Cost
$13,500
$204,940
$232,440
Funding Sources:
Revenue Source
TDNTransNet Claim Amount
Local match (TransNet)
Amount.
$116,220
$116,220
Total $232,440
8-~ 5
Project Location Map:
Contact Person: Roberto Solorzano
Title: Associate Engineer
Address 276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
Phone:
619-409-5420
Fax: 619-691-5171
E-mail:
solo(1ilci.chula-vista.ca .us
Person Authorized to Submit Application:
I certify that I have reviewed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines and the information
submitted in this appiication is accurate and in accordance with these guidelines.
Elizabeth Chopp
$enior Civil Engineer
Title
Date
8&16
Proiect Fundinq:
Total Estimated Project Cost (Please attach a detailed
project estimate based on best available engineering)
$ 232.440
Project Cost Estimates - On a separate sheet provide an itemized cost estimate for all eligible
expenses. Be as accurate as possible to avoid future cost overruns. Projects with cost overruns
have three options for moving the project forward depending on what percentage over the original
grant amount the revised project cost will be. Applicants may ask for a recommendation from the
BPWG to amend original allocation for up to five percent of the original cost estimate (up to the
amount available in the reserve). Projects that require more than five percent additional funding
can resubmit the project in a subsequent funding cycle with the adjusted project amount. Lastly,
the applicants can choose to complete the project with their own funding.
Matching Funds (Category 9 of Project Evaluation Criteria)
Revenue Source
Amount
TransNet
$ 116,220
$
Total
$ 116,220
TDA/TransNet (Application Amount as shown
in Category 10 of Project Evaluation Criteria)
$ 116,220
Total Revenues
$ 232.440
Scope of Work
In the section below, state the project deliverables (including specific quantities and locations of
improvements) and anticipated completion dates. Please note that if this project is funded, this
scope of work will be added to the grant agreement and the grantee will be held to this scope of
work for the purpose of project oversight.
Deliverables Completion
Date'
Final design documents January 2010
Award construction contract April 2010
Complete construction of sidewalk improvements October 2010
8-$7
SupportinQ Materials
A. Community SupportlConsistencv with Community Plan (Cateaor/ 1) - The council or
governing board of the applicant must authorize this grant application. Please attach a copy
of the resolution or minute order documenting that action. Or, if the project is part of an
approved Bicycle Plan, please attach a copy of the section that includes the project
Funding for the proposed project is included in the City's adopted 2009 Capital
Improvement Program STL-336 and STL-347 (copies attached.) A certified copy of the
Chula Vista Council resolution authorizing the application and certifying matching
funds, will be submitted by May 20, 2009.
B. Minimum Desian Standards (Cateaor/ 2) - Projects applying for construction funds must
provide actual drawings or cross-sections from the project itself, not generic standard
drawings. If the applicant is seeking funding for the design and construction of a project,
proposed cross-sections may be used in lieu of the actual plan drawings. If any part of a
. project is substandard, clearly illustrate that (provide photographs, ifapplicable) and provide
an explanation as to why the minimum design standard is not being met.
C. Connect to Reoional Transportation Corridor or Transit linkaae or Reaional Bikewav Map
(Cateaor/ 3) - Provide a map which clearly illustrates the projects relationship to existing
facilities. Show the project's direct linkages to any regional bikeway (for bicycle projects) or
direct continuous link to a local bus stop or direct link to an LRT/tegional transit station. A
direct link for a bicycle project is defined as connecting immediately to a regional bikeway
with no gaps. Adirect link between a pedestrian project and a transit facility is defined as one
in which some part of the facility comes within 600 feet' of a local bus stop or LRT/regional
transit station.
The proposed project will install.sidewalks on the north side of I Street, filling in the
gaps in improvements from Hilltop Drive to First Avenue. This project will be located
within 250 feet of Transit Route 701 bus stop, and within 1000 feet of Hilltop Drive.
Elementary School.
See attached map
D. Completes Connection/linkaae in Existina Bicvcle/Pedestrian Network (Cateaor/ 4) - List
and briefly describe the linkages or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian network.
Provide a map that clearly illustrates the projects relationship to existing facilities.
This segment would fill in the gaps of missing sidewalk on the north side of I Street
between Hilltop Drive and First Avenue. It will provide a safer and more consistent
path for pedestrians and students. This project will also install missing pedestrian
ramps and will upgrade the existing ramp on the northeast corner of I Street and.First
Avenue to current ADA standards.
S -ftJ8
Proiect Readiness (Cateoorv 5)
Phase Beqin
Feasibility Study October 2008
Preliminary Engineering Januarv 2009
Environmental Document/Certification September 2009
Final Design October 2009
Advertise for Construction Februarv 2010
Begin Construction June 2010
Project Completion.
Complete
November 2008
March 2009
September 2009
Januarv 2010
April 2010
September 2010
October 2010
E. GeoGraohic Factors/GIS Analvsis (CateGorv 6) - SANDAG will perform a GIS analysis as
described in the Bicycl~ and Pedestrian .Claims Guidelines based upon a project map
provided by the applicant Briefly describe project limits. and provide a location map clearly
showing the project alignment. In addition, clearly show and label the following elements:
a. major traffic generators within the project area (within Y.-mile. for pedestrian
projects and within 1-mile for bicycle projects)
b. linkage or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities
c. linkage to any regional bikeway or public transit stop
Attached
F. GeoGraohic Factors/GIS Analvsis (CateGorv 6) - List and briefly describe major traffic
generators served by the project.
The proposed sidewalk along I Street is located within a quarter mile of:
Transit Routes 701 & 709
Hilltop Drive Elementary School
Saint Marks Evangelical Lutheran Church
Hilltop Drive Transit Routes 701 & 709 bus stops
First Church of Christ Scientist
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
and within half of mile of:
Hilltop High School
Hilltop Middle School
Saint John's Episcopal School & Church
Saint Rose of Lima Church
Hilltop Baptist Church
G. Safety Improvements (CateGorv 7) - Describe the safety issues addressed by the project.
Please attach support documentation for safety and accident history. If collision data is
provided, it must be specific in pointing out which collisions are applicable to the project and
why it is relevant.
8~r1i9
The proposed project will increase the safety of pedestrians at the proposed location.
This project will provide a safe route and prevent pedestrians from walking along the
. gutter. There are no accidents reported for this location.
H. Innovation and DesiGn (CateGorv 8) - Describe any design innovations for bicycle/pedestrian
priority measures that are included within the project limits.
Is this project in your agency's adopted capital improvement program (Y/N) y.
If the project is part of a larger capital improvement project, briefly discuss how the bicycle or
pedestrian project costs were identified and a description of the other sources of funds for the
overall project.
Not part of a larger CIP.
Briefly describe any other aspects of the project that is relevant to its evaluation.
This location is a reGular route for students attendinG Hilltoo Drive Elementarv School.
Bicycle Master Plans. Pedestrian Master Plans, Education/Safety Proqrams and Bicycle
Parkinq
Bicycle Master Plans, Education/Safety Programs and Bicycle Parking projects will each be
considered in a separate category. These types of projects are encouraged and will be evaluated
by SANDAG staff.
8-120
Basic Guidelines
Bicycle Master Plans - Cities with population up to 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of
$75,000. Cities with population greater than 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $150,000.
Beginning with the 2010 project application cycle, all cities will need to have a SANDAG-
approved Bicycle Plan to be eligible for TDAiTransNet funds for individual projects.
Pedestrian Master Plans - An agency may submit an application for a pedestrian master plan no
more frequently than once every five years. Jurisdictions with a population over 150,000 may
submit applications for up to $150,000, and jurisdictions with a population under 150,000 may
submit applications up to S100,000. In either case, the amount of the application must be
substantiated by providing a scope of work and project budget to SANDAG.
Education/Safety Programs - An agency must submit a scope of work and a proposed schedule
to be evaluated by SANDAG staff.
Bicycle Parking - Projects that conform to SANDAG's Bicycle Parking Guidelines and have a
projected cost up to $50,000 will be eligible.
All claims, including those supporting educational or promotional programs and claims for
planning projects, must include a project budget, work program, and project schedule.
84~1
-""<.I1J'HI!!ll;C:l11I ~f\gency):
PrDjecl Name:
CategDry
1. CDmmunily SuppDrtlCDnslstency with
CDmmunily Plan
2. Minimum Design Standards
3. CDnnecltD RegiDnal TranspDrtaliDn
CDrridDrl
Transit Linkage-
20 Points Maximum
4. CDmpleles Conneclion/Linkage in Exisling
Pedes Irian Network -
5. Projecl Readiness'
20 Points Maximum
GeDgraphic FactDrs/GIS Analysis-
20 Points Maximum
Safety Improvements.-
20 Polnls Maximum
8 Innovation and Design -
10 Potnts Maximum
9. Regional Housing Needs Incentive -
50 Points Maximum
10. Matching Funds
25 Points Maximum
11. Cost Benefit
15 Points Maximum
City of Chula Vista
Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements
FY 2010 Pedestrian Project Evaluation Criteria Matrix
Criterta
Must have atleasl one of the following tD qualify. Please aUach suppDrting documentalion.
1. ResoluliDn or minutes from City CDuncil. County Board of Supervisors. IDcal planning group. or Planning Commission.
Or
2. Pro-ecl is art Df a NDn-MotDrized Plan that has been a roved within the lasl five ears.
Musl meetllle minimum geometric standards set forth in the SANDAG Plannino and Desionino for Pedeslrians manual and Ihe
Americans with Disabilities Act. Design exceptions may be presented for cDnsideraliDn by the Bicycie-Pedeslrian Working
Group wilh the understanding that Inilial projecl proposals also musl Include a design that meels minimum standards.
Projecl is within 1/4 mile of a IDcallransit StDp or regiDnal transit statiDn.
Pro. eet is within 600 feet of, and rovides a direct continuous connection to local transit sto .
Pro'ect Is within 600 feet of, and rovides a direct continuous connection to re ional transit station,
Completes or improves connection in existing pedestrian network
crosswalk
SCDre is based Dnthe fDrmula provided in the currently adDpted BDard Policy ND. 033.
Matching funds can be from any of the following SDurces:
1. Identified and approved- capital funding from identified source. Please provide proof in the form of a resolution Of letter
Df approval.
2. ApprDved match grant.
3. In-kind services. Please rDvlde ade Drl dDcumentalion.
SublDtal SCDre I Grant ApplicatiDn AmDunt
. PrevlDus project milestDnes musl be met befDre qualifying fDr subsequent funding.
.. Preliminary Engineering and Finat Designs wilt be subject 10 design review by SANDAG.
16
PotenUal Points
PasslFail
Pass/Fail
4
4
4
4
4
O'ID 20
4
6
8
10
SubtDtal
o tD 50
(Malchlng Funds) I
(Projecl CDSt) x 25
Score
Patis
Pass
10
14
20
20
14
20
4
4
4
10
15
20
12
OlD 15
""
. 'r ..
-S;.I?,
.,;::;t~=<: .
~B0t\t1SfA;
City of Chuia Vista
PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Infrastructure Planning
....:;,
S.4
Date
Prepared By:
Checked By:
9-Apr-QS
Jeff Moneda
Project Number:
Sidewalk Safety Program - I Street Sidewalk Improvements, from First
Project Title: Avenue to Hilltop Drive (north side)
Installation of new sidewalk, driveWays. and pedestrian ramps.
Description:
1; emova an Isposa orexIs ng improvements i 1 j LS i. $10,000.0~ $10,000,00
2iExcavation & grading (TDA) i 1 i LS i $10,000,00 i $10,000,00
. ---------_.-------.-\.---------~-------_._.,..........-...._~---~~..
3iPCC sidewalk (TDA) i 3600 i SF i $12.00 I $43,200,00
........................~r~.~.~....~.~~~~~.~..:.f~~...~!!g!.~.\~...P..o.~.~.~......................................................................:.....J......................................~.9..9.........:..............:'..........T....~..{.T.............~.................~j.~;..g.~..I................,......~...::..................:......$..i3X!.o..;..Q.9....
S!PCC driveway, Tr,,'nsnet portion i 2S00 ! SF i $15.00 i . $37,500.00
._---...,:,~--- ._--_..~~~--.
siPedestrian ramps, (TDA) ! 2 i EA i $5,000.00 ! $10,000.00
. 7iPublic convenience and safety (Traffic control) ! 1 ! LS.i $5,000.00 i . $5,000,00
........................~.r~~~~f~~~~..~~~~.~~~.~.........:............................................:..............:..............:...............,:..............:.l...........~.................:..:~}~.....::........:........:~......r.....~....T................~3..9.:..~.~~;~~....r...............:........::................~.....~~t.~~~.:..~.~::
10'jWrought iron Ie nee relocation i - 100 i--i::f'!~50.0'or- $5,000.00
---:-- . 1-----.---------,-.---1""'-.. -'__
11iRemoval and replacementodsidewalk ! 250 iSF! $10.001 $2,500.00
=r.
"
. ,
.....................:................................:............................:................::......................:......~...................................................:....:..:......:..:......:................:J....:...............,:......................:....~.....:..............~.....:...T...............:..t.......:........................:..........:......:'.......:l.....::............:..:..~.......:..........:'...................:..:....::..................
.-........-<.---.--.-------..--.--------------f-------...j,--..-i.-..--.--..-.~---..-...--
...............j..........................................................................................................1'............................................)...........'1..................................r....................................................
..............1'........................................................................................................."f.................................:............;...........;-.................................i.....................................................
R Solorzano
I street.go..:.t2s~M.X1S
4/13/2009
City of Chula Vista
Public Works I Engiueering DCl'llrlmcnl / Iufrllstruclurc Plllnning
Sidewalk Safety Program - I Sttoeet Sidewalk Improvements fmm First Avenue to Hilltop Drive (north side)
October-08 November-08 10/1/2008
Preliminary Engineerinhg Janua -09 March-09 1/1/2009
3 Environmental Document/Certification Seetember-09 September-09
r'~ Final Design October-09 Janua -10
I-~ Advertise for Construction February-lO April-l0
16 Begin Construction June-l0 September-lO
~ Pro"ect Com letion Se tember-l0 October-l0
-Po
CJ1
CITY OF
CHULA VISTA-
City of Chuta Vista FY2010 TDA AppHcation .
Sidewalk Safety Program - ~ Street SIdewalk Improvements
PROPOSED RETAINING
WALL (LENGTH VARIES)
PROPOSED 5' SIDEWALK
I STREET CROSS SECTION
BETWEEN HILLTOP DRIVE AND FIRST AVENUE
IE
LANDSCAPED BUFFER
AREA EASEMENT
t
40'
00
I
N
en
...
20'
--
hl~5'
J ..
2%
2%J --r
NO SCALE
DRAWN BY:
ROBERTO SOLORZANO
DA TE: SHEET 1
APRIL-2DD OF 1 SHTS.
IP.
20'
80'
...I...
ct
..... .
20'
40'
20' =:::J LANOSCAPED BUFFER
AREA EASEMENT
2%
2%
......-
-......
20'
+
-
20'
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I STREET CROSS SECTION
PREPARED BY:
ROBERTO SOLORZANO
]
<
~)
<
2
~
;:::;
>-'
!;..:..,
"
.~
>
....)
?;.
."....:J
North Side of I Street west of Hilltop Drive - Looking west
~
~
'-'
t
<:
=J;
~
-
<
~
C>
S?
;;:j
.c
"
.~
>
'...}
'-
~..
~
North Side of I Street west of Hilltop Drive - Looking west
.~
c..
<
ei;
~
<
a
'"
;:::;
;.-
-'-
.:2i
>
'--'
~
!:;.
....;
North Side of I Street wes'6*6i@op Drive - Looking north
.Q
E:
<
Cl;
-
<
~
c-
~
;::,
;..-
c..:..
"
.~
>
'''';
~~.
...;
CII' NO:
TITLE:
COMMUNITY PLAN AREA:
COST ESTIMATES:
1. Planning I Env. Reviow
2. Land Acquisition
3. Design
4. Consliuclion
co
I
(.oJ
-"
TOTALS
FINANCING SOUllCES:
TDA
'rnANSNET
TOT ALS:
STU36
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL
Citywido
Sidewalk (InslaJlalion) Safely Program
NEW CIP NO
PROJECT
TOTAL
$6,000
$0
$38,000
$162,000
:"i:i06,OOO::;'~
$6,000
$0
. $38,000
$212,000
- '--[C;::!i-'
;~:~"J~::\~:::~~;::$'i56~OO{)!lj:~;.\:;~::~pi:~;'.':'l: 'I,.
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS
THRU 2007-08
24183360
Jj, 'i ::~.(;:
I: -
L;~,~.~
. (:;:~
c"~'!~:'
FY 2008-09
.to
$0
$0
(S50,oooi
:-:;~~:~{':~~~::~'._~~($S~O:20.~j'J~; .
INITIALLY SCHEDULED:
DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT MANAGER:
FY 2009-10
~:,{;~~~~~::!~J~;r:;~.:~~1~~~':~~'Q~:~~~: :
07!O t/2007
I
~~'li:t':"
;~i::"
install pee sidewalks along schoul routes, senior citizen centers, illld high pedestrluu traffic areas. Work
will he limited tu are.as with existing curb and gutter.
JUSTIFICATION: Sonlo arells in tho City along school rootcs, with oxisting curb & gutter lacle sidowulks. This projoct will
complete these lieeded improvements with minimum design required. Areas to be :iele~(ed will be along
school routcs, uround :icnior citizen centers, and ill "reas of high pcdestdnn traffic. Funding from TDA will
pay for all the sidewalk, sidewalk urea across drivewnys. all(l pedestrian ramp work. Matching funds urea
required 10 cover the costs ot: the r'est of the driveway aprons. .
DESCRIPTION:
SCHEDULING: ' See Slatus.
Engincerillg
Elizabeth Chopp
FY 2010-11
FY 20'11-12
FY 2012-13
STATlIS: Preliminary design began ill FY 2008.
$0
$0
$0
$0
SO ,to $0
$0 .to $0
SO $0 $0
S(} SO $0
~Y~:~~~~f~~~{~~~~~.<;;ii~~;~~~~ ~~:~~ti..:~ ~ ~ ~<~~:~,$((M1.~~ .~~- _. ~. . ..~-S()"r:'~
$0
SO
$0
$0
SO
~O
"='~_~~,::-'- _. ,:'_-:-=:;l-~~-;~''':: SO L
$~~~:~~~ 1 ~:~~:~~~. l.'~:~':I, _($jOJO~~) I ,n" "~~
I:~:::.; ..;::';::,:~. S20 6 Il) 0 0 ~;:;~.I.':~r:I~;,.~i~]jh:~~.. $2 S 6~ 00 0:: :';\~~:~~~;'~.I ;S~:!:~if'~'~ I ";;~~~~:~~fdS5~ ,0 OOfi~~~:1 ~.1:i~2~P~~:; r.i..ti~k~' $O:~';;:
BUDGET EFfECT: Rouline Maintenance only.
:~J~~-ft;~~~",j,.~:;.:(!t~~:so ;~~~. 'li!~:.:)~'~ ~~: ~~::;;'~1~f:' $O"':~
VICINITY MAP:
147
\'
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL
CIP NO: STLJ47 NEW CIP NO; 24193470 INITIALLY SCHEDULED: 07/01/200D
TITLE: S'idcwalk 11IstallatiulI FY200D-09 DEPARTMENT: ' Engineering
COMMUNITY PLAN AI<EA: Citywide PROJECT MANAGER; Elizabeth ChuJlIl
PROJECT TOTAL it]~;:~
COST ESTIMATES: APPROPRIATIONS (Y 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13
TOTAL .' ,~....
THRU 200Hl8 .~~t:'~r~,,~
I, Planning I Env, Review $2 500 SO .l~.~".:_ S1 500 $0 $0 $0 $0
2, Land Acquisllloll $0 $0 r!r~:_. .. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
J:Oeslgll $22 000 $0 '_::.Jil.'~' S22 000 $0 $0 $0 $0
4. ConslHJclion $140,000 $0 ':;~':':l-. SI40,OOO SO $0 $0 SO
5, contingencies $2D,OOO $0 :;:l;u::;; $28,000 $0 $0 $0 SO
G. Ilroiect. nHlIlli~emelll $7,500 SO 0' . $7500 $0 $0 $0 SO
,-\-..
TOTALS , ~:~~~':f~ $200 ,OOO:"~.;'k-. .~,ju~~~2h}: 2'~~~j~~~::: s 0 'j~,!~~~~ji~;. :j::Jr~ ~~~i~q~~~~<~~~~$i 0-9 I~Q Q~:.;i;~'J.' :::~~':~~1~iW;i~f:~~;~j~~~f~I~~1 $P~~~ l~~!i~~~,~~~;;&;~:~~r;:io I~~i~b ;~h~i::~~~~~~~_~~~ii;t:~:tS'o':~,~~~ :~I~: "i~:~'-,iu .w, so -,
(X)
I
w
N
FINANCING SOURCES:
TDA $100,000 SO I ";,'!: I $100,000 SO, $0 SO $0
T1lANSNET SIOO,OOO $0 I,~,;t-l $lOrl,OOO $0 $0 $0 SO
Tal ALS: ::~;:):. . ,~t~"' ;., S 200 10 0 l~;.t~- -;;.~~ "'l!::;.~.:;'~~-,4~~.{,~~tJ' S 9 \;.h;:~~ ~::. . ~~'.~.r:' ~._lm~t~~~~~:'?~1?;S20 O:iO oo,!{..j;~~ g8l~ul::.t~:~~i!;f:d~~i~E'SO(~' '}~}"i~;:':::~'i:;:~~t :~i.~ s 0 .:/at~~, -'~i::."""'!'~ .-. ~~i'"-:l: $0'" .t~ ~..~ ~~;. SII' 0
j"", -- ~.,
DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this project 'is to install pee sidewalks along school roulcs. seniur citizen centers, and high
. pedestrillll tnlffic Ulcas. WlUk will be limited In areas with existing curb 8mI gutter.
JUSTIFICATION: Some ureas inlhe City along school roules, with existing CUll> & gutter tuck sidewulks. This Ilroject wilt
cOlllplete these needed iml'lOvemenls with minimum design required. Areus 10 be selected will be along
school routes, around senior citizen ctnters. aud in areas of high pedestrian traffic. Funding from TDA will
pay for nil the .!lidewalll, sidewalk area across driveways, and pedestrian r(\IHp work. Matching funds are
required 10 cover the costs of the rest of the driveway aprons.
SCHEDULING: See Status.
STATUS: Designlu begin in FY 200D-09.
BUDGET EFFECT: Matching funds to come from Tnll1sNel.
VICINITY MAP:
151
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF. THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT
APPLICATION AND CERTIFYING MATCHING FUNDS FOR
THE I STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS Al'ID
APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRAi'TT APPLICATION
FOR THE BIKEWAY MASTER PLAl"J UPDATE TO THE SAN
. DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SAl'TDAG) FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 TRA1'TSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT.
ACT (TDA) AND TRANSNET FUNDING FOR BICYCLE Al'TD
PEDESTRIAl'T PROJECTS
WHEREAS, the State Transportation Development Act (TDA) and TransNet programs
generally provide funding. for bicycle and pedestrian facilities through a competitive grant
process on an annual basis. The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) issued a
call for projects on April 8,2009 for funding during FiscalYear 2009-10; and
WHEREAS, funds are provided on a non-competitive basis for the preparation of a
Bikeway Master Plan every five years. An updated plan is required to obtain certain regional
and State funding for bicycle facilities. Since the City's current Bikeway Master Plan was
completed in January 2005, the City is eligible to apply for funding of $150,000 to update this
plan; and
WHEREAS, the I Street Sidewalk Improvement project will complete the missing
pedestrian improvements on the north side of I Street between Hilltop Drive and First A venue,
which is within Y4-mile of Hilltop Drive Elementary School. This project is estimated to cost
$232,440 with a requested grant amount of $116,220; and
WHEREAS, there is sufficient TransNet funding in sidewalk installation CIP projects
.STL336 and STL347 to provide the $116,220 in matching funds for the I Street Sidewalk
Improvements project; and
WHEREAS, since the current action seeks only to approve the submittal of a grant
application, this action is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State
CEQA guidelines. Should grant funding be procured, additional environmental review will
subsequently be conducted and the appropriate environmental determination will be made.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby approve the submittal of a grant application and certifies matching funds for
the I Street Sidewalk Improvements and approves the submittal of a grant application for the
Bikeway Master Plan Update to the San Diego Association of Governments for Fiscal Year
2009-10 Transportation Development Act and TransNet funding for Bicycle and Pedestrian
Projects. . .
8-33
Presented by
Richard A. Hopkins
Director of Public Works
Approved as to form by
8-34