Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd 2000-2826ORDINANCE NO. 2826 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2579 RELATING TO AN INTERIM PRE-STATE ROUTE 125 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE TO PAY FOR TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN THE CITY'S EASTERN AREA AND TO PAY FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ADVANCING THE CONSTRUCTION OF STATE ROUTE 125 WHEREAS, the City's General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements require that adequate, safe transportation facilities be available to accommodate the increased traffic created by new development; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that potential delays in the construction of State Route 125 (SR-125) by Caltrans or others will adversely impact the City's ability to accommodate said increased traffic; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 2251, the original Transportation Development Impact Fee Ordinance included State Route 125 from State Route 54 to the Southem Eastlake Boundary as a project to be financed by the fee established by that ordinance in recognition of the importance of that facility to the City's overall transportation network; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 2579 established an Interim Pre-State Ronte 125 Development Impact Fee which recognized the importance of the State Route 125 to the City's cimulation system in the Eastern Tenitories and levied a fee on new development to pay for an interim facility in the event State Route 125 could not be built. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: FINDINGS The City Council finds that the construction of State Route 125 will mitigate the adverse impacts on the City's transportation system caused by increased traffic resulting from new development; and The City Council finds that the construction of State Route 125 will provide a greater benefit in accommodating the increased traffic than will construction of an interim facility within the general State Route 125 corridor which has limited traffic capacity: and The City Council finds that the adverse effects of Caltrans' delay in constructing SR-125 can be avoided by use of the Interim State Route 125 Development Impact Fee to advance the construction of State Route 125 all to the benefit of public safety; and The City Council finds that the use of the Interim Pre-State Route 125 Development Impact Fee funds to advance the construction of State Route 125 is a reasonable means of spreading the burden among all of the developers in the Eastem Territories; and The City Council finds that the use of the Interim Pre-State Route 125 Development Impact Fee funds is an equitable and reasonable mariner of financing the activities necessary to advance the construction of State Route 125; and Ordinance 2826 Page 2 The City Council finds that using the collected fees to advance the construction of State Route 125 will benefit overall transportation in the City of Chula Vista; and The City Council finds that the "Interim State Route 125 Facility Feasibility Study" prepared by the firm of Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff in May, 1993, references the importance of State Route 125 and the need for a transportation facility in the corridor in order to accommodate increasing traffic due to development; and The City Council finds that there is a demonstrated need for a permanent facility to serve the needs created by new development and that such a need is bene~cially met by using transportation fees for purposes related to such a permanent facility rather than solely relying on an interim, temporary solution; and The City Council finds that the legislative findings and determinations set forth in Ordinance Nos. 2579, 2759 and 2770 continue to be true and correct; and The City Council finds, based on the evidence presented at the meeting held for this Ordinance, including the "Interim State Route 125 Facility Feasibility Study" prepared by the firm of Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff in May, 1993, the City's General Plan, and the various reports and information received by the City Council in the ordinary course of its business, that the imposition of traffic impact fees on all development in the eastern territories for which building permits have not been issued is necessary in order to protect the public, health, safety and welfare and in order to assure effective implementation of the City's General Plan. SECTION 2: Ordinance 2579, Section I (e), Establishment of Fees, is hereby amended to add a new paragraph as follows: To advance the construction of State Route 125 the expenditures for which include, but are not limited to, the costs related to studying the feasibility of purchasing the franchise, purchasing the franchise, acquiring right of way, and constructing State Route 125 as either a toll facility or freeway. SECTION 3: TIME LIMIT FOR PROTEST AND JUDICIAL ACTION Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside void or annul this ordinance shall be brought within the time period as established by law. In accordance with Govemment Code Section 66020(d)(1), the ninety-day approval period in which parties may protest begins upon the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 4: Those portions of Ordinances 2579, 2759 and 2770 not amended by this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. -- Ordinance 2826 Page 3 Presented by Approved as to form by isttDirector PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 17th day of October, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Davis, Moot, Padilla, Salas and Horton NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ATTEST: Shirley HortoZMayor Susan Bigelow, City Cler~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2826 had its first reading at a regular meeting held on the l0th day of October, 2000 and its second reading and adoption at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of October, 2000. Executed this 17th day of October, 2000 Susan Bigelow, City Cler