HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd 2000-2822ORDINANCE NO. 2822
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING SECTIONS 19.14.581, 19.14.582,
19.14.583, 19.14.584, AND 19.14.587 OF THE MLrNICIPAL
CODE, AND ADDING SECTION 19.14.591 TO THE
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING DESIGN REVIEW
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP, SCOPE OF
RESPONSIBILITIES, AND PROCEDURES
WHEREAS the City of Chula Vista Design Review Committee is responsible for
reviewing all significant development within the City; and
WHEREAS the Design Review permitting process has an appreciable positive impact
upon the quality of development within the City of Chula Vista; and
WHEREAS it is necessary from time to time to modify the Design Review process
within the City in order to help improve project permitting; and
WHEREAS the City Cotmcil finds it necessary at this time to further define and clarify
Design Review Committee membership, scope of responsibilities, and procedures; and
WHEREAS on August 9, 2000, the Planning Commission voted 6-0, recommending that
the City Council approve the Zoning Code text amendments regarding design review; and
WHEREAS the City Council set the time and place for a hearing on said amendment and
notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of
general circulation in the City at least ten days prior to the hearing, and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely September
12, 2000, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council,
and said heating was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found the proposal, as a procedural amendment, is exempt
from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under the General Rule exemption
section 15061 (b)(3).
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find,
determine, resolve, and ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That Sections 19.14.581, 19.14.582, 19.14.583, 19.14.584, 19.14.587 of the
Municipal Code be amended to read as shown in Exhibit "A," and that Section 19.14.591 be
added to the Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit "A."
SECTION II. That the City Council hereby finds that the text amendment will enhance the
health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Chula Vista, is consistent with the General Plan, and
is supported by public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice.
Ordinance 2822
Page 2
Presented by
Robert A. Leiter
Planning and Building Director
Approved as to form by
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 26th day of September, 2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Davis, Moot, Salas and Horton
NAYS: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: Padilla
ATTEST:
Shirley Hortony~hyor
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 2822 had its first reading at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of September,
2000 and its second reading and adoption at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
26th day of September, 2000.
Executed this 26th day of September, 2000
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
19.14.584 Design Review Committee-Membership qualification.
A,
The Design Review Committee shall consist of five members appointed by the
majority vote of the council. The membership shall be comprised of persons
sensitive to design consideration and interested in townscape matters. Persons
qualified for membership shall be limited to architects, landscape architects, land
planners, developers, and other design professionals with suitable experience.
All members should be familiar with and able to read and interpret architectural
drawings, and be able to judge the effect of a proposed project, structure or sign upon
the surrounding neighborhood and community. (Ord 1771 §3 (part), 1977).
19.14.586 Design Review Committee-Removal or vacancy.
Any member of the Design Review Committee may be removed by a majority vote of the
city council. A vacancy shall be filled in the same manner as an original appointment and
the person filling the vacancy shall serve for the remainder of the removed member's
unexpired term. If a member is absent without cause from three consecutive regular
meetings, the office becomes automatically vacant. A member is not absent without cause
if the absence is due to illness, business or vacation. (Ord 1771 §3 (part), 1977).
19.14.587 Design Review Committee-Quorum.
Three members shall constitute a quontm. Action by the Design Review Committee
requires a majority vote of the quorum. (Ord 1771 §3 (part), 1977).
If a project is scheduled for a meeting of the Design Review Committee for final
approval, and a quorum is not available for the scheduled meeting, the applicant may
choose to have the matter considered by the DRC at its next meeting, may request
a special DRC meeting to consider the matter, may request that the DRC application
be considered by the Planning Commission (at no additional cost to the applicant)
at its next available meeting (subject to public noticing requirements) for action, or
may request that the DRC application be referred directly to the City Cotmcil (at no
cost to the applicant) at its next available meeting (subject to public noticing
requirements) for action.
19.14.588 Design Review Committee-Schedule of meetings.
The Design Review Committee shall meet at least twice each month. Special meetings may
be held in accordance with provisions of the goverrtment code of the state. The meetings
shall not be held on any legal holiday. (Ord 1771 §3 (part), 1977).
19.14.589 Design Review Committee-Election of officers.
At the first regularly scheduled meeting of the Design Review Committee, and on each July
thereafter, the members shall elect a chairman and vice-chairman from among its members
toserveatermofoneyear, and tmtil the successor ofeach takes office. (Ord1771 §3(part), '
1977).
19.14.590
Fees for appeals and requested actions before the planning commission and
zoning administrator.
For all appeals from actions of the planning commission, zoning administrator or any appeal
filed pursuant to Chapter 19.12 or 19.14, the fee shall be the required fee(s). In addition, any
request for action by the planning commission not specifically covered within the fee
structure established by this chapter shall be subject to the required fee(s) therefore. (Ord
2506 §1 (part), 1992; Ord 2011 §1 (part), 1982; Ord 1813 §2, 1978).
19.14.591 Continuance of project.
Any action by the DRC to continue a project shall be done with the concurrence of the
applicant. If the applicant does not agree to a continuance of the project the Design Review
Committee shall render a decision. If the project is denied an explanation of the reasons for
denial shall be provided.
19.14.600 Design review approval-Time limit for implementation-Extensions.
Design review approval will be conditioned on the plan being implemented within one year
after the effective approval date thereof. Implementation of the plan would include
completion of construction or substantial expenditures of money by the property owner
preparatory to construction. If there has been a lapse of work for three months after
commencement, the approved plans shall be void. The Design Review Committee or the
zoning administrator may grant an extension of time for a currently valid plan upon appeal
of the property owner provided that there has been no material change of cimumstances
since the original grant of approval which would be injurious to the neighborhood or
otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The application for an extension of time shall
be accompanied by the Required Fee(s). (Ord 2506 § 1 (part), 1992; Ord 2309A § 1, 1989).
Ordinance 2822
EXHIBIT "A"
19.14.581 Design Review Committee-Creation.
In order to relieve the planning commission of certain routine functions necessary to the
proper administration of this chapter, to intensify this municipality's efforts to improve its
townscape, and to promote the orderly growth and amenity of the city and environs, there
is established a Design Review Conunittee with such authority as is granted by this chapter.
The Design Review Committee's purpose is to ensure that development within the City of
Chula Vista is orderly, of a high quality, and consistent with City-approved design
guidelines.
19.14.582 Design Review Committee-Duties and responsibilities.
The Design Review Committee shall review plans for the establishment, location,
expansion or alteration of uses or structures in all R-3 zones, all commercial and
industrial zones, and development and redevelopment within redevelopment project
area botmdaries and shall approve, conditionally approve or deny such plans, except
when projects are within the boundaries of a redevelopment project, in which case
the committee shall recommend approval, conditional approval or denial to the
redevelopment agency of the city. The committee shall render decisions on minor
proposals as defined in Agency Resolution No. 71.
The Design Review Committee shall also review plans for the establishment,
location, expansion or alteration of multiple family dwelling uses, major use permits,
commercial, or industrial projects or structures located within the 1985 Montgomery
annexation area, and governed by Chapter 19.70 of this ordinance.
The responsibility of the Design Review Committee shall be limited to the review
of site plans, landscaping, and the exterior design of buildings, for consistency with
City-approved design guidelines. In reviewing a residential project, the DRC shall
consider the costs/benefits of any recommended improvement as reported by the
applicant.
The Design Review Conu'nittee shall review all appeals filed to contest sign design
rulings of the zoning administrator.
The Design Review Committee shall base its findings and actions upon the
provisions of the effected design manuals of the city.
The Design Review Committee shall prepare and adopt operational procedures,
bylaws and business forms.
H,
19.14.583
A.
C,
The Design Review Committee shall submit annual reports on its operations to the
city planning commission and redevelopment agency.
The fee for a heating before the Design Review Committee is the required fee(s).
The zoning administrator has the discretion, with the concurrence of the applicant,
to act in the place of the Design Review Committee in the case of minor projects,
including signs, commercial, industrial or institutional additions which constitute less
than a fifty percent increase in floor area or twenty thousand square feet, whichever
is less, and residential projects of four units or less. The zoning administrator may
also act in the place of the Design Review Committee in the case of new commercial,
industrial or institutional projects with a total floor area of twenty thousand square
feet or less when such projects are located within a planned community area with its
own design guidelines and design review process. A decision of the zoning
administrator may be appealed to the Design Review Committee in the same manner
as set forth in Section 19.14.583. The fee for zoning administrator design review
shall be the required fee(s).
(Ord 2603 §2, 1994; Ord 2506 §1 (part), 1992; Ord 2365 §2, 1990; Ord 2350 §1,
1990; Ord 2309A §4, 1989; Ord 2142 §1 (part), 1986; Ord 2036 §1 (part), 1983; Ord
1961 §1 (part), 1982; Ord 1893 §1 (part), 1980; Ord 1771 §3 (part), 1977).
Design Review Committee-Appeal procedure.
Except on decisions involving the redevelopment projects, the applicant or other
interested persons may file an appeal from the decision of the Design Review
Committee to the planning commission or city council within ten working days after
the decision is filed with the city clerk. The applicant has the choice of filing an
appeal from the Design Review Committee directly to either the planning
commission or city council. The appeal shall be in writing and filed in triplicate with
the planning department on forms prescribed for the appeal, and shall specify therein
the argumem against the decision ofthe Design Review Committee. Ifan appeal is
filed within the time limit specified, it automatically stays proceedings in the matter
until a determination is made by the planning commission or city council. All
appeals regarding projects within redevelopment projects shall be filed with the
director of community development and forwarded to the agency.
Upon the heating of such appeal, the planning commission may, by resolution,
affirm, reverse or modify, in whole or in part, any determination of the Design
Review Committee. The resolution must contain a finding of facts showing wherein
the project meets or fails to meet the requirements of this chapter and the provisions
of the design review manual.
The decision of the planning commission may be appealed to the city council in the
same manner as set forth in this section for appeals to the planning commission. (Ord
2036 §1 (part), 1983; Ord 1994 §1, 1982; Ord 1771 §3 (part), 1977).