Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009/04/07 Item 9 e -- -- / fe/YI 9 If CREATING A SUSTAINABLE CHULA VISTA NATURE CENTER Serving, Preserving... Naturally! PRELIMINARY REpORT OF THE MAYOR'S TASK FORCE APRIL 7, 2009 q f\-[ e ';f,-NBtB'QF :OGNT-E-'N'is ... "d......_ ~,.....,.. I. Executive Summary 3 II. Introduction 4 III. Case for Change 6 A. Diminished Financial Support from the City of Chula Vista 6 B. Task Force Mission and Methodology 7 C. Task Force Committees 1. Governance and Operating Agreement 2. Operations: program assessment 3. Legal and Human Resources considerations 4. Fundraising and Business Development 5. Marketing 6. Financial Restructuring: future alternatives 8 8 11 22 23 31 33 fa IV. Preliminary Recommendations 37 A. The formation of a public-private partnership to operate the Chula Vista Nature , Center (CVNC); B. Broad access to the CVNC for the general public; C. Joint funding future operations of the CVNC in meaningful ways; D.Utilities and services; E. A transition fund; F. Reasonable efforts by the City for future capital funding; G. Employee status, compensation, benefits and retirement; H. Independent, self-perpetuating Board of Directors of the non-profit as a multi- member organization; , I. The City's role and authority; J. Parking and access; K. A transition period to ensure a smooth transfer of management and operations; and L. Tasks for the transition team; V. Conclusion 39 8 Creating A Sustainabie Chula Vista Nature Center 2 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 qA,-cA I. ~mr.m ) The City ofChula Vista owns the Nature Center facility and has licensing and easement access through the Department of U.S. Fish & Wildlife. The Chula Vista Nature Center has been funded for the majority of its operational costs by the City of Chula Vista for several years. The national economic downturn has impacted local government decisions regarding the services that can be offered during challenging economic times. The Mayor's Task Force for the Nature Center, through active work by six committees, studied the Nature Center's current financial structure and its operations in order to prepare a Sustainability Plan under diminished City funding. The Task Force was asked to recommend a strategic action plan that will protect the Nature Center as an asset, comply with legal contracts and agreements, and explore opportunities for future operations. The goal is to create a sustainability plan that will provide a fiscally sustainable model--one that has the financial staying power to operate and maintain the City's valuable asset. An operational review was conducted. This included peer review by representatives of zoological organizations and entertainment-focused entities, organizational structure, staffing, and accountability issues. Legal and human resources concerns were outlined. A comparison was made of a scenario in which all employees were employed by a non-profit versus all employees employed by the City of Chula Vista, and another of a scenario in which existing employees remain City employees and new employees are hired as non-profit employees, with and without City-provided pump crew. ) The Nature Center has no outstanding fiscal liabilities other than debt service for the loan to make recent facility improvements and some grant restrictions. Marketing and fundraising plans were drafted. . It is anticipated that the City seeks a meaningful role in efforts to maintain the City's asset and keep the Nature Center open to the public. An as-yet~undefined public-private partnership between the City of Chula Vista and a 501 (c)3 organization seems to have the greatest promise in achieving the goal of sustain ability. This is a timely opportunity to consider a sustainability plan that, if ultimately approved by the CVCC, transitions to operation by a non--profit entity through a negotiated operating agreement with the City. ) Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 3 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7 f 2009 q~6 e II. IN;fROD.tJCTioN . ~ - ~ - The Chula Vista Nature Center, uniquely located on 3.3 acres of history-rich Gunpowder Point and the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge, provides many significant recreational, scenic and educational opportunities to Chula Vista residents and to visitors to the South Bay. The Nature Center is a world-class zoological institution with hands-on exhibits and live animal displays which detail the importance of natural resources and their delicate ecosystem balance. The Nature Center has provided the public with a quality nature center/living museum experience while promoting coastal resource conservation and environmental stewardship through education since 1987. The Center is accredited by the American Association of Museums, and is an internationally recognized exhibit of plants and animals native to San Diego Bay and marsh/wetland habitats. Over the past three years alone, the Nature Center has welcomed almost 60,000 visitors and 400 school field trips annually who experience up- close and personal visits with endangered species such as green sea turtles, shorebirds, hawks, sharks, stingrays, and jellyfish. e In cooperation with various partners, the Chula Vista Nature Center is committed to educating the public on the importance of coastal resource conservation through field trips, guided walks, classes, tours, and special projects. The Center provides tours for students of all ages from schools in the San Diego/Baja California region. Nature Center docents annually guide over 15,000 students from diverse ethnic, cultural, and economic backgrounds around the Center and grounds, helping students learn about watershed ecology, wetlands, habitat preservation and environmental conservation, thereby helping them develop a strong sense of environmental stewardship at an early age. The Chula Vista Elementary School District's full-time Science Resource Teacher works closely with Nature Center staff to provide 5,000 students with environmental education programs that are integrated into the science and social studies curricula. e Milestones 1987 -The Chula Vista Nature Center opened on July 4th, funded by Chula Vista redevelopment. Coastal Conservancy funded the exhibits. 1988 - The Center won an Orchid Award for building design. 1989 - 300 acres was designated as Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge. 1990 - A greenhouse was constructed using a Coastal Conservancy grant of $50,000 and soon, endangered marsh plants sprouted seedlings. 1990 - A burrowing owl aviary and avian support building were constructed, allowing visitors to see and hear birds which are normally hidden from view, and curators to monitor birds, eggs, and their young. 1994 -Interpretive Trails were opened on Gunpowder Point. 1998 - The Butterfly and Hummingbird Garden was constructed. The Clapper Rail Aviary was completed and the first pair of endangered clapper rails was welcomed. Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 4 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 q A~ t./- 2000 - Raptor enclosures, a shark and ray experience, and eagle mesa were constructed. 2003 - The San Diego October fires wiped out native wild Rainbow/Steelhead Trout in the Laguna Mountains. The Nature Center includes their only known remaining population of this endangered species. Efforts are underway to breed the captive adults and release the young into native waters. 2004 - The one hundredth light-footed clapper rail was released, capturing the attention of the international zoo and conservation community. Prior to 2001, no facility in the world had successfully bred these endangered birds. Nature Center staff, in partnership with Sea World San Diego's Bird Department, augmented the wild population by almost 20% in just four years. 2004-2005 - Plans were drawn up to renovate the main building exhibits and retail area. 2005 - A state-of-the-art Green Sea Turtle exhibit was installed, underwritten by a $30,000 grant from the San Diego Women's Foundation. 2006 - A million dollar capital campaign involving local businesses, international corporations, individual philanthropists, and foundations was launched to completely and successfully renovate the Nature Center in time for its 20th Anniversary. 2007,2008 -Worldwide Monitoring Day hosted students from throughout the region to connect with their environment and with one another. tj History 1987 - The Nature Center, prior to opening, was turned over to the non-profit Bayfront 1"'"\ Conservancy Trust, in anticipation of funds to support the Center from a special tax ) assessment district on 100 acres of land to be developed east of the Sweetwater Marsh. 1992 - The California Coastal Commission approved Local Coastal Plans for bay:front development. However, hotels, restaurants, tennis courts, and visitor-serving businesses were not constructed, leaving the funding source of a special tax assessment district completely dry. 1997 - Staff and volunteers formed The Environmental Legacy Fund (ELF) for Nature Center fundraising. The Bayfront Conservancy Trust reorganized into the Chula Vista Nature Center Board of Trustees and the ELF was eventually renamed the Friends of the Chula Vista Nature Center. 2002 - The Nature Center became an official department of the City of Chula Vista, which began to provide the majority ofthe Center's annual budget. 2007 -08 - City of Chula Vista's General Fund budget of $156 million was cut by $26 million. 2008-09 - The City's budget will be cut by $4 million this year and by $16 million more next year. An economic downturn, along with diminished local revenue means that the City can fund only core municipal services. Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 5 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 qA-S ) e m._. The Nature Center is a million dollar annual operation with $750,000 supported through the City and $250,000 raised through private donations, ticket sales, memberships and gift shop sales. Diminished Financial Support from the Citv of Chula Vista With a history of 75% of its annual budget coming from the City of Chula Vista, the Nature Center has been subject to recent City budget cuts. As important as the Nature Center is to education and preservation, it is not the core municipal service that public safety and public works provide, and cannot draw from the City's depleted reserves. The depressed economy is impacting the Nature Center's funding. A funding source not tied to the City's General Fund is needed to assure the ongoing function of this inspiring facility. One long-term plan is to establish an endowment of $20 million that will spin off interest annually to support Nature Center operations. An endowment will ensure financial security for the Nature Center and the ongoing maintenance ofthis local treasure. e The short-term plan is to fundraise for the immediate operational needs of the organization for the fiscal year beginning July 1,2009. The following table illustrates actual funding from 2006-07 and 2007-08, and an estimated budget for 2008-09. Cuts were made in operations. Admission fees were increased. 8 Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 6 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 q 14.- CC Nature Center Expenditures and Revenues 06-07 to 08-09 Expenditures 08-09 06-07 (actual) 07-08 (actual) (budQet before cuts) Personnel $ 817,838 $ 872,348 $ 730,846 Supplies & Services $ 105,688 $ 76,689 $ 93,400 Other $ 56,769 $ 45,187 $ 61,000 Utilities $ 57,875 $ 51,833 $ 60,451 Grant costs $ 6,671 $ 2,315 $ 3,500 Gift Shop $ 47,611 $ 30,627 $ 38,480 Total $ 1,092,451 $ 1,078,999 $ 987,677 Revenues 08-09 06-07 (actual) 07-08 (actual) (estimated) Gift Shop Sales $ 76,269 $ 68,246 $ 81,700 Building Lease $ 3,507 $ 4,323 $ 5,150 Seminar Fees $ 7,610 $ 6,252 $ 5,150 Admission Fees $ 141,538 $ 133,475 $ 140,000 Donations (exceeded '08) $ 54,774 $ 45,729 $ 56,100 Grants $ 30,265 $ 50,010 $ 30,000 Total $ 313,964 $ 308,035 $ 318,100 Overating costs $ 778,487 $ 770,964 $ 669,577 rJ ') Task Force Mission and Methodology In December 2008, Mayor Cox commissioned a Nature Center Task Force to examine the current status of the Chula Vista Nature Center as a City Department and to recommend a strategic action plan that will protect the Nature Center as an asset; comply with legal contracts and agreements, and explore opportunities for future operations. The goal is to create a sustainability plan that will provide a fiscally sustainable model--one that has the financial staying power to operate and maintain the City's valuable asset. A viable sustainability plan will enslire the following: 1) that the Nature Center remains open with the help of staff and volunteers, 2) has a solid financial outlook, and 3) has a strategy for increasing paying visitors and donations. The Sustainability Plan includes components in governance, operations (including peer review by individuals from similar facilities), legal services/human resources services, fundraising and marketing, and financial restructuring. Three formal Task Force meetings were held on January 16, February 18 and March 25, 2009. The following Task Force members joined Mayor Cox and Councilmember Pamela Bensoussan: Leah Browder, Deputy City Manager Buck Martin, Director, CVNC Charles Gailband, CVNC staff Kerry Laube, CVNC staff Ben Vallejos, CVNC staff oj Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 7 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 qA-l - Denny Stone, Economic Development Officer Jennifer Quijano, Mayor's staff Andy Yuen, US Fish & Wildlife Ken Weimer, President, Friends of the CVNC Brian Bennett, Friends ofthe CVNC Dr. Brian Joseph, Friends of the CVNC Dr. Larry Wergeland, Friends of the CVNC Susan Fuller, Chair, CVNC Board of Trustees Dan Biggs, President, SCEDC Ken Baumgartner, SCEDC member Bill Tunstall, SCEDC member Cindy Gompper-Graves, SCEDC Executive Director Renee Harrell, President, RHC Cecil Dunagan, Vistage Richard Kiy, International Community Foundation, offered his assistance, as did Doug Myers and Mike Mace from the San Diego Zoo, whose staff visited the Nature Center several times and will soon relay several recommendations. Ken Baumgartner and Dan Biggs headed up research regarding financial restructuring, Dr. Brian Joseph looked at governance and current operations, Buck Martin discussed human resources and legal issues with City staff, Denny Stone and Renee Herrell drafted marketing and fundraising plans, and CVNC advocates Susan Fuller, Ken Weimer, and Larry Wergeland investigated the Nature Center's currently defined and possibly redefined roles. e Contacts were made to the offices of Congressman Bob Filner, and Senators Boxer and Feinstein, and to corporate and individual donors. Port Commissioner Michael Najera and City Manager Jim Sandoval talked with members of the San Diego Unified Port District about the need for financial support. Information was mailed to the San Diego Economic Development Council, the South County Economic Development Council, and the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce. Imperial Beach Councilmember Patricia McCoy assisted with contacting wildlife advocacy groups. The Task Force analyzed a wide range of issues affecting strategic, operational and financial planning for the CVNC, including marketing, fundraising, and human resources and legal issues. The findings and preliminary recommendations from the Task Force are set forth in the pages that follow. Task Force Committees Six committees met from January to March in preparation for monthly meetings of the entire Task Force. Committee assignments were Governance and Operating Agreement; Operations: program assessment; Legal and Human Resources considerations; Fundraising and Business Development; Marketing; and Financial Restructuring: future alternatives. Their work was invaluable. e Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 8 q A- 'B Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 Governance and Operating Agreement: Susan Fuller, Dr. Brian Joseph, Dr. Larry Wergeland and Ken Weimer .tj Committee members held a series of meetings in which agreements between cities and non-profits for the operation of zoos and aquariums were reviewed and considered. Bylaws of non-profits operating zoos and aquariums under operating agreements with city governments were reviewed and considered. A useful document was "Building a Premier Zoo for Houston: the Mayor's Task Force." This document, dated August 2001, concluded that the Houston Zoo could grow and better serve Houstonians through operation by the Houston Zoological Society under an operating agreement with the City of Houston. The purpose of the Houston document was to let the Zoo grow through increased fundraising associated with operation as a non-profit. Two quotes from "Building a Premier Zoo" summarize where we are today: o "We believe that many legitimate demands for public resources and the necessary diverse priorities of govemment will continue to prohibit the City from independently addressing the Zoo's funding needs," and, 8 "Discussions with members of Houston's philanthropic community suggest that in order to secure significant private-sector funding, more private-sector control over Zoo decision-making is required." Recommendations from "Building a Premier Zoo" included the following: . joint funding of future operations by the City of Houston and its non-profit; . the establishment of a transition fund to ensure a successful transfer of operations; o reasonable efforts by the City to assist with future capital funding; o employment considerations; II governance by an independent Board who would direct Zoo management, operations, control the budget, admissions prices, access progran1s, and physical plant; II adequate parking and access assured by the City of Houston. .~ Examination of relevant operating agreements between zoos, aquariums and non-profits suggest consideration, negotiation, definition and inclusion of the following aspects of operation in an operating agreement should the City Council determine that Nature Center operations should shift to a 501(c)3 non-profit organization: . Operation and management- a definition of the Mission of the Nature Center and its management · Relationship with and inspection by the City- appointment of City liaison with the non-profit · Admission- empowers the Society to regulate the cost of admission and retain revenues · Facility property- defines facilities as the property ofthe City · Living property- assigns ownership and responsibility for the living collection and its management to the non-profit o Capital improvements- defines if City will provide or match capital dollars ~ Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 9 q A.-q Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 e · City representation on the non-profit Board- defines level of representation (10% or so) on the 501(c)3 Board . Duration term of Agreement · Care and maintenance- defines responsibility for facilities and living collection · Utilities- defines responsibility for installing or upgrading utilities and payment of utility fees .. Emplciyees- defines responsibility for hiring and managing employees, defines who employees work for . Insurance- defines responsibility . Indemnification · Gifts and endowment- obligates the non-profit to seek gifts, cash, property, bequests and endowment o Rules and regulations- obligates following Association of Zoos and Aquariums rules · Separation of functions-devote non-profit's assets and resources and City funds solely and exclusively to the purposes described in this agreement .. Nondiscrimination · Appropriations and grants offunds to the non-profit for Nature Center operations- describes City funding o Concessions- grants the right to manage concessions to the non-profit . Notice · Independent contractor- defines that the non-profit and operators are independent contractors \vith exclusive control and direction of equipment and personnel .. No third party beneficiary e a W Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 10 q A-/O Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 . Operations: Program Assessment Brian Joseph, DVM r; / Introduction A daylong program and operation assessment (Assessment) was conducted at the Chula Vista Nature Center on February 17, 2009. The Assessment Team (Team) included the following members: · Jim Antrim, former Zoological Vice President, Sea World California; · Brian Joseph, DVM, Living Exhibits Inc., Escondido, California; · Chris Spaulding, Curator, Sea Life Center, Carlsbad, California; and · Elizabeth Thomsen, Director of Education, San Diego Wild Animal Park, Escondido, California. The Team shares over 110 years of experience in publicly operated, non-profit and for- profit zoological institutions. Team members individually participated previously in over 25 accreditation inspections on behalf of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA), the Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks and Aquariums, and as paid inspection consultants. The Assessment process included advance analysis of Chula Vista Nature Center (CVNC) programs and operations data and information. Reviewed materials included budgets, organizational structure, position descriptions, job duties, programs and volunteer program operation. On-site Assessment activities included a guided site tour, individual staff interviews and inspection of facilities. .~ The Team considered the following questions in order to provide input to financial modeling that will be useful in developing a successful sustainability plan: 1. Is the quality of programming , animal care, exhibits, conservation and educational efforts consistent with the zoological community and appropriate for an organization of the CVNC's size and budget? 2. Are staffing levels appropriate for the sizelbudget of the organization and the diversity of its programming? 3. Is staff compensation appropriate? 4. Are there areas of programming that can be expanded to increase revenue? 5. Are there areas in which cost cutting can occur? 6. Are the organizational structure and individual work responsibilities appropriate? 7. Do employees' job descriptions accurately reflect their duties? 8. Is the present distribution of positions appropriate for the organization? 9. How does the CVNC compare to other zoological institutions in the region on a cost per visitor basis? Achievements The Team commended the CVNC for several achievements: 1. A highly dedicated, hard working staff works with passion for the institution and for its mission; tj Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 11 q A-II Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 e 2. Staff stepped up efforts to maintain the operation of the CVNC in the presence of decreased resources and executive leadership; 3. Staff operate at a level of effort that cannot be maintained and should not be expected on a long term basis; 4. The facility is in generally good repair and is attractive; 5. Excellent examples of cooperation with City personnel, most notably with the City pump maintenance crew and the City electrical crew allows the institution to operate at a high level of quality; 6. Exhibits are of high quality and more regionally relevant than most animal exhibits within southern California; and 7. Interpretation in English and Spanish is unique among zoological facilities in southern California and well serves the constituent population. Concerns ~. ~ 1. An onsite, autonomous, executive director with sole responsibility for the management of day-to-day and long range activities is necessary to adequately advocate the mission, organization and employees in a focused manner, rather than performing these activities remotely as a small part of a large, diverse, and demanding position. Technical, professional managerial, fundraising, consistent communication, problem solving experience and working cooperatively in a political environment are needed. This position is mandated for American Museum Association and Association of Zoos and Aquariums accreditation; 2. Revenue generation can be addressed by developing a business plan that increases educational programming and revenue generation. The majority of educational programs within zoological institutions are required to generate sufficient revenue to be self-sustaining or nearly self-sustaining. This is fiscally responsible and also allows increased facility use and increased educational contributions to the supporting community. An unused classroom provides the opportunity to expand on-site educational and wildlife outreach programming. While the finite space occupied by I the CVNC within a federal refuge precludes substantial capital investment in new facilities that might result in increased visitor numbers and revenue, there is tremendous opportunity to expand into the community through wildlife outreach programmmg; 3. Isolation from the educational interpretive community can be remedied with input from local educational partners. Development of better connections can lead to expanded program diversity, use of shared resources and increased resources; ~ ~ 4. Facility and equipment repairs should be defined and costs and funding should be identified. These include a PVC discharge line through which the muck from salt water reservoirs can be discharged and an appropriate waste water pump powerful enough to pump the muck out of saltwater reservoirs. An air compressor should be replaced. The shorebird exhibit requires rebuilding, including an impervious liner as the unprotected bank continually crumbles into the pool. Its pump and lines require Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 12 q {\-IJ.. Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 significant maintenance. The entry gate mechanism needs repair or replacement. The 0 road to the CVNC requires resurfacing. Shark and ray touch pool handrails require ' ) maintenance. Many graphics that are just over 2 years old require replacement. The sump pump on the lower, outside visitor level requires replacement as the area floods during periods of rain. Entry floor screens in front of the two automatic doors to the CVNC require replacement. The exterior stucco needs repair. 5. Facility improvements are needed in the areas of stabilized quality of incoming water, parking, security, and a planned gateway that results in a sense of arrival; 6. A marketing program that includes hiring a marketing consultant, pro bono marketing, and marketing dollars consistent with the norms of a zoological community can help capture market share and membership in a manner consistent with norms of zoological community and integrate costs into the business plan. The present operating structure, as a part of a civic entity, precludes dedicating adequate marketing to attract guests. The 2009 CVNC marketing budget is $2,000. This represents less than 1% of the total operating budget. Typical zoological institution marketing budgets range from 8 % ($76,800 in this case) to 28 % ($268,800 in this case) since it is recognized that there is a direct relationship between marketing and attendance. It is desirable to capture market share commensurate with the population located within 50 miles of the CVNC. Membership, although growing slowly, is lower than what is commonly 1""\, _ accepted. As a comparison, one out of every four households in San Diego County is , ) a member of the Zoological Society of San Diego. 7. If the City Council decides that a shift in operations from the City to a non-profit is desired, then - B Organizational structure of non-profit operations will require redefinition. More typical of zoological institutions is a structure characterized by an executive director, an administrative assistant and two supervisors who report to the executive director. A guest experience supervisor would supervise two positions: a volunteer/educational specialist and a retail/guest experience specialist. An animal collection/operations supervisor would supervise an aquarist, a keeper responsible for non-fish segment of the collection, a maintenance worker, a custodial worker and a life support worker in the event that the City does not provide pump crew services; B Communication between CVNC and other City employees will need to be redefined; · Protocols and programmatic manuals will require review and development, with attention to risk liability. These can be helpful in training staff and volunteers and to prevent "drift" from acceptable practices; · Staffing plans will need to be reviewed. Staffing levels must provide for redundancy in the event of employee illness, vacation or unexpected absence in order to provide consistent care of the animal collection and physical plant. n, . Workloads must be balanced. Staffing levels must be sufficiently adequate to , ) Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 13 q A-/3 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 - maintain grounds and facilities. Staffing plans will need to be negotiated as a part of the operating and funding agreements with a non-profit 501(c)3 organization; and . Employee status/compensation will need to be reviewed. Current wages and benefits for personnel appear higher than similar positions in zoological institutions today. One resolution that accompanies conversion of operation from civic to non-profit is for existing employees to remain employees ofthe City throughout their service, retaining wages and benefits while new employees are hired by the non-profit at a different rate of compensation. The City could . continue to fund the City employees at their current level of compensation or, fund the differential between what City employees are paid and what employees of the non-profit are paid. Or, City employees could transfer to vacant City positions or become non-profit employees at different rates of compensation. Employee compensation and employee status would need to be negotiated with non-profit operator as a part of operating agreement and funding agreement. Opportunities and Recommendations e 1. This is a timely opportunity to develop a sustainability plan that maintains the City's asset and transitions to operation by a non-profit entity through a negotiated operating agreement with the City. A new operating model, most likely operation by a non- . profit, can reduce funding ri.sk associated with civic operation. The facility size is too small to operate on a for-profit basis and will require a level of continued City funding. 2. Pursue additional federal operating funding through the existing relationship with Fish and Wildlife Service. The CVNC provides some of the best wetland interpretation the Team is aware of and is located within a federal Wildlife Refuge. Only 5% of California's original wetlands when the Spanish explorers came to California exist today, making the CVNC an even greater asset to the population of the United States at large. The Nature Center is one of the few venues located on federal land that provides interpretation concerning the conservation of California wetlands. It provides one of very few opportunities to impress young visitors regarding the need to conserve wetlands. e 3. Operation as a non-profit business must include the development and implementation of a non-profit business plan bas~d upon increased revenue generation, e.g., adjustments in admissions and membership fees and expansion of educational . programming that will increase revenue streams. Successful zoological institutions operate as businesses and focus on revenue generation and high quality programming. There is substantial opportunity to increase revenue streams from attendance, member"ship; programming, development and after hours, corporate and other group' events (e.g., Scouting). Entry into the CVNC requires modification to capture revenue from visitors that ride on the bus, so that visitors actually pay admission fees Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center .14 qA.-It1 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 upon entering the main entrance rather than first visiting outdoor exhibits and neglecting to pay admission. fj 4. Attempt to reduce utility costs through completing sewer lines and installing increased photovoltaic cells. . Increased Revenue Opportunities · Admission Fees Typically, non-profit operations generate one third of their annual operating budgets through revenue generation other than fundraising. The CVNC's existing sources of current revenue generation other than fundraising are admission fees ($140,000), rentals/leases ($5,150), membership fees (included under donations) and seminars/classes ($5,150). The Team believes that each has room for increased revenue, but recognizes existing limitations that make revenue increases challenging. · Potential for Increased Admission Dollars Table 1 lists admission prices for various categories of discretionary activities within San Diego County. A comparison of Chula Vista Nature Center admission prices for each category suggests that present admission prices are significantly lower than should be borne by the local market. Table 1 Comparison of Admission Prices for Discretionary Activities in San Diego County f) Organization Senior Adult Student Juniors Children Children Chula Vista Nature Center $5.00 (55+) $6.00 $5.00 S4.00 $3.00 (4-11) Free (18 w/id) (12-17) (>4) San Diego New Children's S10.00 S10.00 S10.00 SIO.OO $10.00 Museum Fleet Space Theater $8.75 $10.00 $8.75 (3-12) Fleet Space Theater + Imax SI1.75 S14.50 SI1.75 (3-12) Ultrastar CV 10 Theater $7.50 $10.50 S10.50 $7.50 Regal Cinema $7.50 $10.50 $10.50 $7.50 Birch Aquarium $9.00 S11.00 S8.00 S7.50 S7.50 (3-11) Free> 3 (60 +) (12-17) Del Mar Fair $7.00 $13.00 $7.00 (6--12) (62 +) Natural History Museum SI1.00 $13.00 S8.00 w/id S8.00 S7.00 USS Midway Museum S13.00 (62) S17.00 S9.00 S9.00 (6-11) (12.17) Sea Life Center $15.95 S18.95 , SI1.95 $11.95 (60 +) Knott's Soak City S19.99 S30.00 S19.99 (<48") San Diego Zoo $35.00 S35.00 $35.00 $26.00 (12+) (3-1 I) Legoland S53.00 . S63.00 $53.00 (60 +) (13-59) (3-12) San Diego Wild Animal $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 S26.00 Park (plus $19.00 parking) (12 +) (3-11 ) Sea World S65.00 S65.00 S65.00 $65.00 S55.00 (3-9) ~ Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 15 q A-IS" Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 Nature Center admissions prices are low. Increases in admissions prices suggested in Table 2 can generate significant revenue to assist in supporting operating costs (Table 3) without considering increases in admission numbers. Table 3 suggests that if attendance by category remains the same in 2009 and the suggested increases in admission costs are implemented, $176,413 additional dollars in revenue would result. If one assumes that paid admission numbers in 2009 will increase by 15% as a result of additional marketing, an additional $45,563 would result in a total of $221,975 additional operating dollars or $387,113 total operating dollars results wi11likely be one third of the Nature Center's operating budget without considering other increases in revenue. Admission Cate ory Current Sug ested $5.00 $7.50 $6.00 $10.50 Table 3 Comparison of Admission Revenue Excluding Members using 2008 Admissions: Total from implementing suggested admission rates plus 15 % increase in paid admissions: $387,113 - Increase Revenue 2008 Paid Current Suggested from 15% from 15 % Category Age Total Total Increased Increased Increase in Admissions Rate Rate Admission Admissions Paid Price Admissions Adults 18- 15,164 $6.00 $90,984 $10.50 $159,222 568,238 2275 $23,888 54 (44%) Seniors 55 5013 $5.00 $25,065 $7.50 $37,598 $12,532 752 $5640 + (15 %) Student 18 2254 $5.00 $11,270 $7.50 $16,905 $5,635 338 $2,535 w/id (7 %) Juniors 12- 1816 $4.00 $ 7 ,264 $7.50 $13,620 $13,620 272 $2,040 17 (5 %) Child 6- 10,185 $3.00 $30,555 $7.50 $76,388 $76,388 1528 $11,460 11 (30%) Total 34,432 $165,138 $341,550 $176,413 5165 $45,563 Numbers of paid admissions are lower than should be expected for reasons that include a lack of marketing and a lack of a sense of arrival. . Most zoological institutions invest from 7 to 28 % of total operating dollars in marketing. The CVNC spent less than 1 % of the total operating budget in 2008 on marketing. Increasing marketing dollars to 10 % of the total operating budget and investing in a marketing consultant wi11like1y result in increased admissions revenue. The increased numbers of paid admissions since the public was made aware of the difficult financial status of the CVNC support the argument that public awareness of the CVNC is too low. 8 Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center , 16 q A-ICe Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 . Unless potential visitors know where they are going, the CVNC is difficult to find. In effect, you don't know that you have arrived unless you know where the CVNC is located. () · Rentals/Leases Exploring the potential for additional revenue from facility rentals and leases will require time and effort, and additional staffing costs. Today's total budgeted revenue from facility rentals and leases is $5150. It is unlikely that additional dollars from rentals/leases can match additional dollars gained by increases in paid attendance and admission fees. m Education Program Potential The majority of zoological institutions generate substantial revenue from the operation of educational programs. Under the CVNC's arrangement with the Chula Vista Elementary School District, the District supplies a teacher and the Nature Center provides a classroom. Approximately 6,000 students are admitted without charge. In addition, approximately 15,000 students from outside the ChuJa Vista Elementary School District attend the Nature Center each year. Some students are charged admission or admission costs are sponsored by the San Diego Unified Port District. Additional programming during and subsequent to the Assessment are needed. Efforts to expand programming can be rapidly advanced through the participation of local informal educators such as Beth Thomsen from the San Diego Wild Animal Park. Most schools are accustomed to paying reduced admissions fees, such as two to four r='\. _ dollars per student, to participate in self-guided visits. Materials can be quickly generated . ) and the admissions fees offset printing and material development. Each child, at a now break even point, is likely to spend two to five dollars in the Nature Center gift store. Chaperones at a ratio of up to one chaperone per ten students are generally admitted at no charge. A quick look at the math shows the following: Two buses per day x five days per week x 30 students per bus x 32 weeks per year x $3 per student = $9,600 per year. This effort requires no effort other than directing students into the CVNC. Programming can be augmented as a guided, scheduled program by charging an additional $2 per student. This generates an additional $6,336 in revenue. Guided tours can be conducted by docents. Expansion of scouting also holds revenue promise. A badge program is in place for Boy Scouts. Girl Scouts should be afforded the same opportunity. Scouting programs can be expanded for Scouts to earn conservation badges. Scout sleepovers resulting in earning a badge can be offered on weekends. Cost to participants would be on a per participant fee, booking up to 30 scouts per session, charging an additional fee over the price of admission for Scouts and admitting Scout leaders at no charge. Participants can sleep in the gallery around the aquaria and exhibits and in classrooms. Purchase of sleeping pads will be necessary due to hard gallery floors. Participant costs could include a dinner catered by a ~ Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 17 q A-Il Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 ~ local restaurant that might discount on food costs, a night time snack and continental breakfast. Ifprograms reached 75 % capacity, $1900 would be grossed for each event. The CVNC operates within a limited perimeter that will ultimately limit admissions expansion. However, wildlife outreach programming throughout San Diego County holds great promise for expansion, although it requires additional staffing and volunteer support that the current CVNC staff does not have to manage this program. Although transportation funding is often limited to bring students to facilities, other funds can bring programming into the schools. A single, one hour, animal ambassador program can bring in $150. With additional staffing and volunteers, programs could be scheduled into schools, hospitals, nursing care centers and other venues. Existing craft programs are of high quality, but are limited in capacity and do not cover costs. Family programming can be expanded, with volunteers continuing to operate these classes. Charges should include time, effort and associated indirect costs. A minimum of $15 should be charged for each adult/child pair. Class size should be limited to 20 people (10 groups of two family members) and class offerings can be offered on an alternating basis each month. People who look for high quality family activities close to home would be likely to book two-hour programs solidly. ~ ~ Increases in education programming revenue will require hiring part time educators at a rate of at least $12.50 per hour for weekend work. The addition of'three part time educators will cover previously mentioned programming. Hiring these educators will be tied to a return on investment that covers all costs and generates additional operating revenue. Local businesses can sponsor a school group or a classroom, donate bus money or sponsor outreach programs. Soliciting these donations will help cultivate donors and expand program access. " Development Assuming the typical non-profit operated model in which one third of operating funds are generated through development activities, significant investment of development resources are necessary. Existing personnel do not have the time to participate in development activities of the scope necessary to support the CVNC. Hiring an executive director to serve full time for the institution is needed to accomplish development goals of this magnitude. A part time development consultant engaged to develop a fundraising plan can identify prospects and participate in development activities. Development is an extended process in which potential donors must first be "sold" on the mission and on sustainable and responsible operation of the institution. The second step is to obtain their limited financial participation and to demonstrate responsible investment of those resources. The third step is "the ask". This is a process that takes years, not weeks. The success of cold calls is minimal. The budget target for 2008 CVNC donations was $56,100, which included $21,552 in membership fees. This is inadequate to provide the budget necessary to operate the Nature Center. In addition to the economy, factors that held down donations in 2008 were the lack Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 18 q A.-l~ Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 of a development plan, a full time executive director and a development consultant. All three n are required ifthe Nature Center is to be sustainable. '. ) The emergency donor solicitation since December 2008 has been effective. These include grants that can help in transitional funding until a sustainability plan can be developed, funded and implemented. The membership program can be expanded through increases in member numbers and through increased membership fees. Table 4 suggests that Nature Center membership is significantly underpriced. This can result in perceived decreased value. This is also tied to the underpriced admission costs. Typically, guests make a decision to purchase membership based on thinking that they will visit the organization at least twice a year. At the very least, membership fees should be increased to a level even with those ofthe Birch Aquarium, ifnot higher. On!anization Adult single Adult dual Family Student (12-17) Child (3-11) Chula Vista Nature Center $25.00 $35.00 $65.00 $25.00 $25.00 Reuben Fleet Space Theater $52.00 $79.00 San Diego Natural History Museum $55.00 $70.00 USS Midway S50.00 $50.00 $75.00 Birch Aquarium $55.00 $68.00 $75.00 San Diego Zoo $71.00 $89.00 $28.00 $25.00 San Diego Wild Animal Park $71.00 $89.00 $28.00 $25.00 Knott's Soak City $79.99 $79.99 (> 48") $50.00 (<48") Sea World $99.00 $99.00 $99.00 Legoland $] 19.00 $99.00 $99.00 Table 4 Membership Fees n · Operating Cost ver Visitor of Regional Zoological Institutions Table 5 suggests that the operating cost per visitor for the CVNC lies in the mid-range of regional zoological facilities. Given its budget, it operates in a significantly efficient manner. Table 5 does not assess visitor stay time, visitor per capita expenditures or funding sources. Jpera mg os s 0 a 1 omla 00 oglca aCl 1 les Operating Annual Operating Organization Location Budget Visits Cost _~er Visitor , Santa Ana Zoo Santa Ana $2,039,191 268,878 $7.58 Cabrillo Aquarium San Pedro $2,613,400 301,633 $8.66 Sacramento Zoo Sacramento $4,691,000 538,000 $8.72 Birch Aquarium San Diego $4,400,000 406,344 $10.83 Aquarium of the Bay San Francisco $6,700,000 600,000 $11.17 Santa Barbara Zoo Santa Barbara $5,822,000 478,917 $12.16 Los Angeles Zoo Los Angeles $19,319,276 1,577,839 $12.24 Oakland Zoo Oakland $7,460,000 550,000 $13.56 ~'if'il~~li&:.~Jl;tIDf~~W1!ffi ~!!i!l~\~lSt'ii; ~2a?i;r6}7!~ 6St"O'OU ~-T- l _.,. -._...__. lr~.gQ o Table 5 l' C t fC J'fI . Z 1 IF '1'1' () Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 19 q A-I q Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 ~ ~ Operating Annual Operating Organization Location Cost Budget Visits per Visitor Fresno's Chaffee Zoo Fresno $6,813,519 398,820 $17.08 Living Desert Palm Desert $8,044,831 354,425 $22.70 Aquarium of the Pacific Long Beach $29,300,000 1,398,000 $20.96 San Diego Wild Animal Park Escondido $50,000,000 1,503,993 $33.24 San Diego Zoo San Diego $200,000,000 3,307,000 $60.48 * American Zoo and Aquariums Association Directory, 2009. .. Staffing Models Staffing models were produced by the Team, considering governance and development of an operating agreement, and were reviewed by Jacque Holden, Director of Human Resources for the Turtle Bay Exploration Park, Redding, CA in an effort to look at the organization from a human resources expert familiar with museum structures and compensation within California museums. Staffing models ramp up staffing to a level consistent with American Association of Museums (AAM) and Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) minimum standards for accreditation. These models include: II Hiring an executive director; II Restructuring the existing administrative secretary position to an administrative assistantlbookkeeper/account clerk position; II Restructuring one program manager position to an animal care/operations supervisor; .. Restructuring one program manager position to a guest experience/education supervIsor; .. Restructuring one program manager position to a guest experience/retail specialist; II Restructuring the senior office specialist to a volunteer/education specialist; II Converting the 0.75 FTE aquarist to a 1.0 FTE aquarist; .. Converting the 0.75 FTE veterinary technician position to a 1.0 FTE keeper position; II Hiring a life support worker ifthe City elects to not continue to provide pump service; and .. Continue maintenance work and groundskeeper/custodial worker positions as currently structured. II . Comparison of Three Basic Organization Staffing Costs (part-time positions not included in staffing costs) .. Employees employed by a non-profit versus employees employed by the City of Chula Vista: potential difference in costs -- $212,400 to $394, 400. Estimated staffing costs for operations by a non-profit entity were $598,800 - $780,800. ~.. VI{jfI D Existing employees remain City employees and new employees are hired as non- profit employees: potential fulltime staffing ranges from $852,777 to $911,777. This model assumes the City ofChula Vista no longer provides pump crew services requiring the non-profit to hire a life support worker. Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 20 q A-C10 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 · Existing employees remain City employees and new employees are hired as non- profit employees: potential fulltime staffing ranges from $804,277 - $853,277. This model assumes the City of Chula Vista provides pump crew services. This assumption does not require the non-profit to hire a life support worker. · Part time employees Part time assistance can provide adequate animal husbandry and animal facility operation. Additional resources are necessary to meet AAM and AZA staffing requirements. The addition of part time employees, including unpaid interns, can maximize revenue generation potential. For example, an additional part time clerk can increase revenue generation from the bookstore. The hiring of these positions is based upon arguments that the hiring will generate more revenue than the positions cost. It is estimated that a part-time aquarist, keeper and clerk, and two part-time teachers will add costs of at least $10 - $15 per hour per employee. Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 21 qA-d( Preliminary Task Force Report April 7 f 2009 () C) tj Legal and Human Resources Considerations Buck Martin, with assistance from the City Attorney's and Human Resources offices. - At the request ofthe Recreation and Nature Center Director, the City Attorney's office reviewed the terms and conditions of grants/contracts awarded to the Chula Vista Nature Center, and gathered information on the City's obligation related to early termination (e.g. ceasing to perform the contract obligations prior to the termination date identified in the contract documents) if such termination were necessary due to the City of Chula Vista's financial circumstances. The City Attorney's office reviewed six grants, two issued by the State Coastal Conservancy (SCe) and four by State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR). All contracts executed with the DPR provide that the only remedy for such early termination is "specific performance," meaning that the City could be forced by a court to continue to perform contract obligation. . Provisions in the remaining contracts require immediate repayment of grant funds. However, an exception to this requirement permits the grant recipient to request a waiver of this requirement from the "Executive Director." The City Attorney opined, "Such waiver would most likely require a statement of extenuating circumstances, which extreme financial hardship due to the current market conditions could meet." 4>> A table showing contracts and dollar amounts awarded to the Nature Center is included below: p Name of ContractlDonor Year Contract Term of Grant Contract was awarded Termination Date State Coastal Conservancy 1995 $400,000 2018 State Coastal Conservancy 2006 $350,000 2027 State of California 1999 $216,700 2019 Dept. of Parks & Recreation State of California 2001 $45,330 2011 Dept. of Parks & Recreation State of California 2001 $147,750 2021 Dept. of Parks & Recreation State of California 2002 $298,000 2022 Dept. of Parks & Recreation - Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 22 qA-~ Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 Fundraising and Business Development Renee Herrell, RCH Consulting f) Fundraising Plan Process Renee Herrell, Fundraising Consultant to the Friends of the Chula Vista Nature Center, implemented a 45-day effort to build a fundraising plan for the Chula Vista Nature Center, directed towards these organizational objectives: · Identify methods to increase fundraising . Identify prospective funders, donors and partners . Cultivate, solicit and steward donors . Develop and execute year round fundraising plan The first step's discovery stage includes interviews and surveys, and the results and recommendations from the surveys. The second step assesses current fundraising resources and creates a plan that outlines initiatives step-by-step including implementation tools. First step: Conduct Surveys, Analyze results, Make Recommendations A 3D-day interview process of Board of Trustees members, staff, Friends of the Nature Center, volunteers, docents, donors, community members and City officials was completed. The Nature Center provided 76 names of people to be interviewed. Fifty-three surveys were completed, including 21 face-to-face interviews, five phone interviews and 27 email surveys. i~ These are the survey recommendations: 1. Hire a Fundraising staff member; 2. Hire a Director staff member who is solely dedicated to the Nature Center; 3. Hire Marketing Firm and/or Marketing staff member to create and implement a marketing plan to help increase visibility of Nature Center, resulting in more admissions and potentially more donations; . 4. Create a fundraising plan to be implemented by fundraising staff; 5. Provide training for Friends of the Nature Center on fundraising; 6. Form a volunteer fundraising committee to specifically work with Fundraising staff member; and 7. The Chula Vista Nature Center will benefit better in fundraising ifthe organization comes under the management of a 501(c)3 Second step: Assemble Fundraising Plan and Tools An analysis of the Nature Center's current fundraising operations identified opportunities to increase fundraising in current initiatives and additional sources of fundraising. A Fundraising Plan outlines efforts to raise funds to support annual operations. The Fundraising Plan identifies these fundraising efforts: · Non-profit 501(c)3 organization such as the Friends of the Nature Center, ~ Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 23 q A -~..3 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 ~ .. Individual Donors, .. Private Foundations, .. Corporations, .. Events, .. Membership, .. Technology, and .. Fundraiser Staff Member. These categories are described in the narrative portion below. Current Fundraisillg Efforts II Current Income Each year, the Nature Centerreceives funds from the following sources: $750,000 from the City, $140,000 from admissions, $81,700 from the gift shop, $6,000 from seminars and classes, $9,000 from rentals, $45,000 from the Port District, $34,548 in donations and $21,552 in memberships. In FY 2008/09, the Nature Center also received $56,100 in grants through the Friends of the Nature Center, revenue from facility rental ($5,150), and seminar and class fees ($5,150). Additionally, the Friends of the Nature Center raised donations from annual events, end ofthe year appeals, annual donations, grants and in miscellaneous donation. @ II Events In recent years, the Nature Center hosted annual fundraising events. In 2007, a special event was held to establish an endowment fund with the San Diego Foundation to .commemorate the Nature Center's 20th anniversary. Several donors committed in advance for the "Raise the Paddle", helping raise $200,000. In 2008, this event raised $15,000. This event was structured differently. Each person was encouraged to bring a friend to the event who would pmiicipate in the auction and "Raise the Paddie". It has not been determined what type of event will be hosted this year in addition to the Sunset Safari which was held on March 28,2009. " Past Grants The Nature Center has received grants to help support special programs, equipment or other needs from the Walton Family Foundation, the Hattie Ettinger, Orca, Rokenbok, and Price Family Funds at the San Diego Foundation, the San Diego Women's Foundation, The Heller Foundation of San Diego, Sea World Busch Gardens Foundation, Duke Energy Foundation, Ayres Advisors, formerly ACI Sunbow, Environmental License Plate Fund, Nassco, Adhor Farms, the California Coastal Commission, the State ofCalifomia Clean Water, Clean Air Act, and County of San Diego through Supervisor Greg Cox. B ~ II Membership There are 680 active members total. In 2007, 347 new and renewal membership transactions generated $ 18,158 in revenue. In 2008, 421 memberships transacted generated $21,552 in revenue. The annual membership fee is $65 for Member Plus (2 adults, 5 Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 24 q A-d~ Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 children), $25 for single Senior/Student/Volunteer, $35 for dual Senior/Student/Volunteer, $35 for single member. The gift shop staff solicits memberships when people are at the Nature Center. The admission receipt is valid towards the purchase of a membership if redeemed within 30 days (as printed at the bottom of each receipt). Memberships are also solicited during outreach programs. () Membership brochures or coupons for a dollar amount off a membership are provided at event booths. Renewal notices are mailed to members during the month before their membership expires. For those who do not respond and renew, reminder letters are sent out the following month. To encourage memberships, a recent partnership with other museums and zoological societies offers free tickets to these institutions when a Chula Vista Nature Center membership is purchased. This is an opportunity to cross promote both organizations and offer an incentive to buy a Nature Center membership. · Annual Fundraising Higher levels of membership are available through the annual giving program including: Friend ($250), Associate ($500), Partner ($1,000), Director's Circle ($2,500), Sponsor ($5,000), and Patron ($10,000). This could be supplemented by end-of-year solicitations. · Recent Fundraising Efforts To-date, over $582,000 has been committed to the Nature Center since December 4, 2008. Of these funds, $116,057 has been received to date. A donation of $1 00,000 was received from the Stephen and Mary Birch Foundation. Two gifts of$125,000 each restrict access until a sustainability plan is written. In December, the Friends of the Chula Vista Nature Center hosted the Sea of Support at Bayside Park. This community fair with an auction, booths, and food raised approximately $25,000 towards the total amount above. Although this is an overwhelming amount of funds raised in a short period of time, it is not sustainable. The Sunset Safari held on March 28,2009, raised $3300 for the Nature Center. () Need With the deficit in City funding and the additional need for staff and resources, a greater contribution from grants and donations will be required. Since the Nature Center has not been responsible to fundraise because 75% of funding in the past has come from the City, a major transformation is needed in order to raise these funds each year. Fundraising Efforts An analysis of the Nature Center's current fundraising operations identified opportunities to increase and add fundraising sources. A Fundraising Plan Overview outlines efforts to raise funds to support annual operations. Fundraising initiatives have been identified in the following categories: Friends of the Nature Center, Individual Donors, Private Foundations, Corporations, Events, Membership, Technology, and Fundraiser Staff Member. These categories are described in the following sections. Additionally, over 50 pages of tools support each category and corresponding fundraising efforts. (j Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 25 qA-dS Preliminary Task Force Report April 7 I 2009 @, _;OJ'," .."', · Friends of the Nature Center #1. Engage Friends members to help withfundraising It is the responsibility of the governing body of a non-profit organization to provide adequate resources for the activities of the organization through direct financial contributions and a commitment to fundraise. The Friends ofthe Nature Center are a passionate group who want to help with fundraising. They welcome learning the savvy tools to be effective. By providing fundraising training, the Friends will learn key strategies to implement and help raise funds. #2. Recruit additional Friends members with a.fJluence and influence A Fundraising Committee should be formed to work in partnership with a Fundraising staff member to execute the fundraising efforts outlined in the Fundraising Plan. It should include Board members and community members who wish to assist with fundraising. #3. Gain 100% giving by all Friends Board members There must be 100% Board participation in donations in order to assist with grants and community image. An organization cannot expect the community to donate to an organization where the organization's top leadership has not financially committed first. At an upcoming Board meeting, the Friends should discuss setting a minimum contribution and total group donations goal. t{;!) ~ m Membership #1. Develop and implement membership drive To increase memberships, the Nature Center could host a membership drive during the summer months when there is high attendance at the Nature Center. During this month long drive, a multi-faceted approach for increased memberships can include the following: gift shop emphasis on membership that includes volunteer training; dedicated staff time to membership; a phoneathon to call upon current and lapsed members to renew; incentives to buy a membership; an evening open house at the Nature Center one night with a ticket price for attendee admission to the event and a one-year membership; an environmental film or lecturer; blog and Twitter to further online memberships. A brainstorming meeting of staff and volunteers should be held one month prior to prepare for the membership drive to discuss membership goals that include financial revenue, better connecting members to the Nature Center, membership benefits, recruiting volunteers to be part of the membership drive, define who the members are, and who to target as new members. A few months after the membership drive, a membership survey can identify how members are served and how to serve them better. #2. Develop partnerships with similar institutions to cross promote membership Continue efforts to cross-promote the Nature Center with other local museums and , zoological societies, reaching out to develop ticket exchange partnerships. ~ ~ #3. Promote admissions through student study trips The Nature Center has opportunities to reach out to parents of over 1,000 students who come through the Nature Center each month. Sending home information to inform parents Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 26 q A -cl t;:, Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 about their children's activities during the day with a coupon for a free child's admission with a full price adult admission can increase parent attendance later. () #4. Reach out to local community service groups In community outreach, individual memberships can be promoted when speaking at local service organizations. Active service group support has come from the Chula Vista Rotary Foundation ($2,000), Chula Vista Women's Club ($400), Inner Wheel Club ofChula Vista ($250), Kiwanis Club of Bonita ($300), and San Diego Fly Fishers ($500). #5. Increase membership renewal rates A simple way to track membership renewal rate must be developed to find out the success rate of current efforts. To increase the renewal rate, additional efforts can be implemented through mail and email. Success in membership retention rates from year to year should be measured. .. Individual Annual Donors #1. Host quarterly events to engage annual donors A membership program serves as a pipeline tool for identifying new annual donors and building stronger relationships with them. With levels ranging from $65 to $10,000, it offers donors a level that is right for them. To keep annual donors engaged and active at the Nature Center, quarterly events for members only ($250 and higher) can focus on different areas of the Nature Center including sneak peeks at new exhibits or special guest lecturers, either during the lunch hour or after work hours. Cj " Individual Major Donors #1. Identify potential major donors Individual major donors are key to any large fundraising project. A major gift is defined by the organization and can range between $1,000 and $1,000,000. A moves management worksheet can list potential donors and track the cultivation, solicitation and stewardship of each major donor. The moves management worksheet lists the potential donor, the donor's relationship manager and his/her history of giving or relationship with organization. The worksheet lists "moves" or clearly defined actions designed to "move" a potential donor towards making a donation. #2. Cultivate potential major donors An effective way to identify and cultivate potential major donors is by exposing them to the Nature Center in a comfortable setting. Board member and current donor connections can be used to host receptions in their homes, with time to socialize before a simple and effective presentation is given. The reception offers an opportunity for the attendees to network. #3 Engage Friends members to help solicitpotential major donors Training for the Friends should be provided on how to cultivate potential donors. .. Private Foundations #1. Assemble list of private foundations () Creating A SustainableChula Vista Nature Center 27 qA-cl.l Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 ~ A list of private foundations and corporations who support organizations like the Nature Center were identified through the suggestions given during the interviews, foundations in the Nature Conservancy annual report and through the San Diego Foundation grant database. Sufficient grant research has been conducted to determine that grants are available for funding programs at the Nature Center. #2. Create grant proposal boiler plate A grant proposal boilerplate has been created to submit to the private foundations researched. The boilerplate includes specific program descriptions and program budgets as well as personal stories about how the Nature Center has positively impacted the animals, the students that visit and volunteer docents. " Corporations #1. Identify unique partnership with local corporations The economy has had a substantial effect on corporate giving to non-profits. In order to gain the support of corporations, identifying unique partnerships with local corporations can raise the visibility of the Nature Center. A good example of this type of partnership is the one with Allied Waste who sent out information about the Nature Center in their March billing cycle. e #2. Gain lo((al support Local companies can financially support the Nature Center. Research has narrowed an extensive list of companies who might realistically fund the Nature Center. #3. Gain matching contributions from individual donors' employers Many employers encourage their employees to financially support nonprofits by offering dollar for dollar match on donations made by their employees. " Events #1. Host annual event This year, we hope to raise more money by using a sponsorship packet, an effective "Raise the Paddle" and live/silent auction. #2. Participate in Beneficiary Events The Nature Center has received funds as a designated beneficiary organization of fundraising events hosted by a third party. This year's beneficiary events are tentatively the 5K Run at the Olympic Training Center, a Bike Path Celebration near the Saltworks and a Kayak Event hosted by the Chula Vista Yacht Club that can raise several thousand dollars. The most effective way to become a beneficiary is through personal connections and media exposure. .. Technology #1. Develop contentfor fundraising page for CVNC's own website The Nature Center can benefit from a website that includes detailed information about the organization. A fundraising page explaining the different ways that a potential donor can Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 28 qA-C).'J Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 financially support the Nature Center should be included. Lists should be updated quarterly to encourage online giving. () #2. Identify online giving tool The current online giving tool must be user friendly--simple and straight forward. Online giving can be incorporated into strategies for increasing annual donations. #3. Identify new donor database The donor database must have the necessary information and tools to effectively manage donor information, and help staff develop strategy for cultivation, solicitation, and stewardship of donors. II Hire a Fundraiser #1. Identify funding to underwrite position The Nature Center should invest in the first year salary for a Fundraiser or find a generous donor to underwrite the first year's salary. This position will be responsible to raise his/her salary as well as the needed funds each year after. #2. Define job description and responsibilities With the need to raise significant additional funds, it is critical that a fundraising staff member be hired to be responsible for raising the annual budget of the Nature Center, including annual fund, membership, major gifts, events and working with the Fundraising Committee and Friends of the Nature Center. f) Support Tools Over 50 pages oftools support each category and its corresponding fundraising initiatives: 1. Fundraising Plan and Narrative 2. Financials a. Current Revenue Breakdown b. Friends Current Fundraising Breakdown c. Fundraising Amount Breakdown Models 1, 2 & 3 3. Friends ofthe Nature Center a. Friends Responsibilities b. Friends Role in Fundraising Training c. Staff and Friends Roles d. Fundraising Committee Description and Responsibilities e. Fundraising Committee List of Potential Members 4. Membership a. Phone-athon Overview b. Membership Discussion c. Membership Survey 5. Individual Donors a. Moves Management Worksheet Cj Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 29 q A -~ q Preliminary Task Force Report April 7 f 2009 e b. Step-by-Step to Confirming a Major Donor c. Reception Timeline d. Friends Major Donor Training 6. Grants a. Private Foundation Grant Research List b. Grant Proposal Boilerplate 7. Corporations a. Corporate Research List b. Corporate Partnerships List c. Corporations Matching Contributions List 8. Events a. Pros and Cons of Fund raising Events b. Fundraising Event Outline c. Corporate Sponsorships d. 14-step Auction Bid Forms e. Raise the Paddle f. Beneficiary Event Policies g. Beneficiary Event List 9. Technology a. Fundraising Content for Website b. Online Giving Tools c. Donor Databases 10. Fundraiser Job Description 11. Fundraising Plan Implementation Timeline and Solicitation Calendar 12. Survey Results and Recommendations ~ ~ Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 30 q A--30 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 Marketing: Denny Stone r; / As the Chula Vista Nature Center (CVNC) moves away from dependence on City funding, it will be necessary to create a market-based set of strategies and tactics for reaching new or expanded audiences and increasing revenues. The following recommendations, while not comprehensive, identify several of the steps. Create an updated, clear and compelling definition of the CVNC's mission and objectives. As a City-funded department, the CVNC was not required to compete completely in the marketplace for customers. This special status created an organization whose role and desired outcomes might need to be clarified based on a more traditional, market-sensitive VisionlMissionlObjectives exercise. The CVNC should and must continue to be driven by its overarching education and preservation roles and build on over 20 years of success, while also integrating the need for objectives related to financial independence from the City. IdentifY the potential volumes and revenues in specific target markets, potentialZv at least in three separate areas: Philanthropic/Grant, Education Market, Mass Market. Finite revenue opportunities exist in different target markets. Limitations may be either externally or internally driven. Examples include capacity limitations in the CVNC facilities, typical driving distances, local or regional philanthropic capacity, and eligibility () requirements for grants. Evaluate and refine products and services offered based on market opportunity. Re-define the scale and scope of services offered to compete more effectively for customers. An understanding of the volumes, price points, competitive set, cost of services, etc. is critical in assessing what the CVNC offers to the market place. IdentifY and allocate an adequate annual budget for marketing and promotion. Based on overall operating budget and the increases in revenues desired, the CVNC should establish a budget for a focused set of marketing activities. With this budget identified, the CVNC should solicit proposals and/or recruit resources for the development and implementation of specific marketing and outreach campaigns. Recognizing that the tools to reach and develop the different market areas referenced above may be significantly different, the best solution may involve three separate sets of focused activities and resources: m Outside agencies may be best suited for creating and placing targeted advertising for the mass market. · Dedicated internal resources or contract consultants may be most effective when (\ dealing with educational organizations or the broader educational market. I ) Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 31 q A-..31 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 · A visible, dedicated professional CVNC executive may be the best investment in creating and implementing a successful development program and implementing a new, independent image and brand for the CVNC. As part of this overall process, consideration should be given to an evaluation of the CVNC name, logo, tagline, etc. to determine if they accurateZv and clearZv communicate the desired messages to the targeted markets. ~ ~ ~ Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 32 q A -..3d, Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 Financial Structuring: Ken Baumgartner and Dan Biggs Cj Funding is critical to addressing the basic needs of the CVNC. The historical City contribution represents approximately 75% of the total funding received by the CVNC. Its operation is the responsibility ofthe City's Park and Recreation Department and is staffed by City employees with strong volunteer support. A drop in City revenues became severe in late 2008, leading the City Manager to recommend that City funds could not be allocated to cover its operating costs. A reduced level of funding by the City is simply not enough to address adequately the basic needs of the CVNC. Because of an outcry from the community to save the Nature Center, alternatives are being considered so that either the City of Chula Vista or a responsible non-profit 501(c)3 can operate the Nature Center on behalf ofthe City. Purpose for Financial Restructuring Realizing that the City has many demands for its limited resources, and given the necessary priorities of the City that result from demands concerning the health and safety of its residents, it is unlikely that the City will be able to finance the necessary operations of the CVNC. Accordingly, the CVNC requires greater reliance on the private sector for future operational funding. In determining the best course of action to put the Nature Center on firm financial footing with expectations for growth in operations through expanded attendance and increases in programs at the Nature Center, the Financial Restructuring Committee recommends that the Chula Vista Nature Center operatIons be transitioned from a r~ City-operated facility so that its operations are managed by a non-profit entity in a manner integrated with the City's likely desire to maintain the Nature Center as an asset. This transition will take at a minimum six months to occur and should begin immediately upon the start ofthe new fiscal year (July I, 2009) in anticipation of fully operational status being reached by the non-profit corporation by December 31, 2009. At this time, the non-profit would assume full responsibility for operations of the Nature Center. The most significant reasons for recommending that operations be assumed by a non- profit organization are these: · Reduced operating costs as changes in staffing compensation occur. · Increased opportunities for fundraising due to the non-profit status of the operator. · Renewed outreach and marketing from a non-profit operator. · Increased flexibility in adapting to market and changing economic conditions as a non-profit operator. A streamlined and non-profit management structure will enable the CVNC to improve its flexibility and responsiveness to critical operational needs of its operations, pursue effectively a long-term vision, and implement long-lasting solutions. () Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 33 q A-..3.3 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 e Transition to a Non-Profit Operated Facility Numerous issues should be addressed by a transition to a non-profit operator of the facility. · Non-profit management The City and a SOI(c)3 non-profit organization such as the Friends of the Chula Vista Nature Center should consider an operations and financing agreement which clearly stipulates the actions required by the City to satisfy its need for protection of assets and to ensure that the facility operation meets its expectation of the community benefit of the Nature Center. The City's investment can be protected by allowing an amount of City-appointed directors to the Board of the non-profit organization operating the Nature Center. · Protection of the City's physical plant investment The City of Chula Vista has invested approximately $8 million in buildings, roads and other physical plant items. The City needs to be certain that this investment will be maintained, whether by the City or by the non-profit. e · Protection of existing commitments Existing agreements between the City of Chula Vista and those who provided funding or grants based upon expectations of certain activities or programs at the Nature Center, such as private corporations, individuals and governmental organizations such as U.S. Fish and Wildlife, must be protected. An operations and funding agreement should clearly state expectations and conditions so that programs and other activities are maintained or expanded to satisfy the letter and intent of those commitments. Future CVNC operations should remain committed to ensuring broad access to the CVNC for all Chula Vistans through the independent administration of need- based accessibility programs (including selective free admission), as well as education programs and other offerings. · S taffin g The City and the non-profit operator should consider negotiating to convert employees to employment by the non-profit organization. The Financial Restructuring Committee's studies of similar organizations show that in today's financial environment, an operator of a facility of this type cannot be financial sustainable with the requirement of public employee compensation and benefits. Virtually all the financial models analyzed for sustainable facilities like the Nature Center are staffed by employees of a non-profit organization. This will take some months to conclude, but is essential to the financial sustainability of the Nature Center since employee costs constitute a 'majority of operational costs. Employee compensation should be based upon standards and norms of the non-profit environment. This can reduce annual operating costs and increase the attractiveness to major funding sources who often insist on financial efficiency. -- Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 34 q 1\ -3'-f Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 · Reduce the City's Financial Support By reducing operating costs, financial support from the City of Chula Vista can be reduced. It is expected that the City would continue to support the Nature Center because of its on-going benefit to Chula Vista residents and its economic benefit to the City. Of the approximate $1 million in annual operating costs, the economic benefit of the Nature Center is estimated to be from $4.5 million to $6 million. This appears as revenue from Nature Center visitors to businesses within the City as they experience the region. f) The annual financial support from the City of Chula Vista can be reduced during the remainder of the current year and remain below current funding horizons: Cash-flow projections will show this in greater detail. I & Expanded Marketing and Fundraising If approved by the City Council, the non-profit organization must develop detailed plans for increasing marketing within the region and throughout the country and have them approved per a negotiated operations and funding agreement by the organization's Board of Directors, which should contain City-appointed members. These activities should be undertaken as soon as possible for the non-profit to be in a position to assume operations by January 1,2010. To provide the necessary programs and to attract the visitors needed to increase revenue, attendance must be increase significantly. Current revenue (paid attendance and gift shop) at the Nature Center generates an annual income of $ 221,700. To become financially sustainable in January 2010, this must be increased through corporate grants, donations, and added revenues from paid attendance and the Nature Center gift store. tj Interim Operations It is unrealistic to maintain current hours of operation for the Chula Vista Nature Center during the transition from City to non-profit organization if the City's contribution on July 1, 2009 is significantly reduced. If the hours of operation are modified to about half ofthe currently offered hours (e.g., closed to the public from Monday through Thursday, opening on Friday through the weekend) a modified operational schedule will capture of revenue attendance during higher visitor periods. Savings in operating costs during this time will allow for fundraising and restructuring of operations to be accomplished in an orderly manner. The Nature Center should then return to the normal hours of operation, operated by the non-profit organization. Funding In January 2010, with the City Council's approval, the Nature Center can begin operations in a new organizational configuration, led by a full-time Executive Director responsible to the non-profit organization's Board of Directors. The Executive Director will assure that the operations are kept within the financial parameters of the operating budget and that the plans for fundraising and marketing are properly executed. During FY 2009-2010, it f) Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 35 QA-3S Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 e is anticipated that the City of Chula Vista and the non-profit corporation provide funding at levels to be determined. The maintenance of pertinent programs and activities and the determination of new ones so that the facility continually improves its visitor experience and attracts greater audiences will depend upon funding. Educational programs will continue to be at the heart of all activities. At year five of operations by the non-profit organization, significant programming changes should assure that the Nature Center is a stable and viable asset for the City of Chula Vista. An endowment plan with significant funding should be in place. Programs for expanded educational programming and visitors' wetlands experience should be well- established and heavily promoted to tourists. Funding from the City of Chula Vista should be stabilized. Essential Elements for the Sustainability of the Nature Center e The Financial Restructuring Committee believes that it is imperative that the operational structure of the Nature Center be changed from City-operated to non-profit organization operated. Doing so will bring the facility in-line with the traditional structure of most successful aquariums and zoos today. It is becoming more perilous for these kinds of organizations / facilities to survive without the donation attractiveness of a non-profit . organization. It is also clear that in order to be sustainable, the organization must reduce operating costs, including employee costs and benefits; wherever possible. This Committee recommends that the hours of operation of the Nature Center be temporarily reduced so that the costs of operation during the transition to a non-profit organization as operator can be minimized. Costs reduced immediately will allow for a safer transition for the facility, assuring that this great cultural and economic asset is viable and ready for a fresh and vibrant restart in 2010. e Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 36 qA-3~ Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 IV. - ~ A public-private partnership should be formed to operate the CVNC, as follows: (i) the City would continue to lease the land upon which the Nature Center buildings stand, hold the license for the easement that allows access to the Nature Center through the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge, and maintain the facilities that compose the CVNC; and (ii) the City and the non-profit would enter into an operating agreement for the management of future operations of the CVNC. A long-term contractual arrangement will instill public confidence in the non-profit and in its ability to operate the CVNC. The operating agreement should specify that future CVNC management should remain committed to ensuring broad access to the CVNC for the general public through the independent administration of need-based accessibility programs (including selective free admission), as well as education programs and other offerings. Encouraging and supporting diverse visitorship strengthens the community's commitment to the CVNC. The operating agreement should give the non-profit flexibility to implement and administer programs best suited over time to providing broad access. The public and private sectors should jointly fund future operations of the CVNC. Although the City will not eliminate all financial responsibility for the CVNC, the City will benefit from the value to the City of having a Nature Center, and from decreased risk and exposure with respect to the CVNC. The City's contribution to CVNC operations must be 1"""\ meaningful rather than nominal, with a minimum contribution that maintains the asset and ) accepts responsibilities for utilities. Growth in the CVNC's operating budget will be funded by the private sector. The City should consider providing supplementary funding for capital improvement projects undertaken withprivate support. As a result, the City's contribution to the CVNC will decrease over time. The result of this funding model will be a Nature Center that depends less on public funding. The need, however, for continued govemmental funding to succeed with future operations should not be underestimated. The City historically has provided utilities for the CVNC (electricity, gas and water/sewer) without a separate charge. Services historically provided without any direct charge vary from legal and accounting services to mechanics and electricians. This aspect of historical funding remains significant to CVNC operations. The City should assist in establishing a transition fund to ensure a successful transfer of operations to non-profit operations. The new entity should not be asked to assume CVNC operations with a pre-established budget deficit. The establishment of a transition fund by the City and the non-profit can offset major expenditures required in the initial years. The City should use reasonable efforts to assist the CVNC with future capital funding. The issue of who is employed at the Nature Center and by whom deserves careful attention. Employees can be fully City employees, fully non-profit employees, or a blend of ) Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 37 q A -.31 Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 e current City employees with new employees hired by the non-profit. Compensation, benefits, and retirement are complicated matters that deserve further study. The Board of Directors (Board) of the 50l(c)3 operating the Nature Center should be an independent, self-perpetuating board that would direct the management of CVNC operations and control the budget, admissions prices, access programs, physical plant and other aspects of the CVNC's operational and financial models. The new organization should be empowered to function autonomously, under the direction of a qualified Board of Directors. The Board should be a multi-member organization with a percentage (10% or so) of the Board members appointed by the public entity. The Board should have authority over matters relating to the physical plant with the exception of not interfering with the City's right to maintain its asset. The City should retain a role by receiving an annual report of operations, audited financial statements and the status of fundraising efforts. The City should retain authority to terminate the arrangement for any major breach of the agreement, including failure to meet specified performance standards. The City should ensure adequate parking and access. Both are critical elements in . maintaining operations. The non-profit should have operational management of CVNC parking lots. -- Should the City Council determine that an operations agreement with a non-profit organization is worthy, a transition period must be determined to ensure a smooth transfer of management and operations. This transition period would be used to merge into the non- profit, develop a CVNC business plan, establish new contracts for services and hire additional staff. The non-profit organization should use this period to seek initial funding for the transition. The transition team/new Board should perform interim actions and draft a series of agreements to remain contingent upon the City Council's approval of the management agreement and structure: " Incorporate the non-profit organization, ifnot already incorporated " Develop a business plan " Draft agreements for contracts " Assess existing contracts, inventory and equipment " Access and design benefits and compensation plans " Assess existing personnel " Establish and develop the transition fund " Create and implement public communications " Address deferred maintenance needs " Establish a time line for implementing the new organizational structure. e Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 38 QA-.3<B Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 v.~ A strong commitment from the public and private sectors working in collaboration and dedicated to a common goal is required to keep the Chula Vista Nature Center open. By creating a public-private partnership, the CVNC can achieve excellence and reach its full potential. The benefits of a public-private partnership will provide increased predictability and decreased risk and exposure. More importantly, however, future generations will benefit from an improved and exciting CVNC experience. Creating A Sustainable Chula Vista Nature Center 39 q A--3Cf Preliminary Task Force Report April 7, 2009 .,. tj ~ ~ ~{f?- ~ - - -- Mayor and City Council City Of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, Ca 91910 619.691.5044 - 619.476.5379 Fax MEMO ~ CllY OF CHULA VISTA April 2, 2009 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Donna Norris, City Clerk Lorraine Bennett, Deputy City Clerk Mayor Cheryl Cox!;! U @ v .. Jennifer Quijano, Constituent Services Mana :r!J!s Bio's and applications for the Cultural Arts Commission and the GMOC (Southwest Representative and Business Representative) CC: VIA: RE: The following have been recommended for appointment to a Commission. The ratification is scheduled for the April 7, 2009 Council meeting. Attached are the applications and below is additional background information. 1. Mary McDermott - Cultural Arts Commission 2. James Doud - GMOC (Southwest Representative) 3. Armida Torres - GMOC (Business Representative) Mary McDermott has been a resident of Chula Vista for the past 18 years. Mary has been an Art Instructor for the past eight years at The Art Institute of CA San Diego in Mission Valley. Mary has a Masters in Humanities with a concentration in Arts and a Doctorate in Fine Art. Jim Doud has been a resident of Chula Vista for the past 50 years. Jim retired in 1991 as a Senior Engineer at Rohr. Jim has served as President/Director of the South Bay Irrigation District / Sweetwater Authority for the past 14 years. Jim is also actively involved in the Southwest Civic Association, Chula Vista Taxpayers Association, the Fraternal Order of Eagles 3142, VFW 2111, the American Legion 434 and serves on the oversight committee for Proposition X, managing a $58M budget to rebuild schools in Imperial Beach, for the South Bay Union School District. Jim's extensive experience and background on water related issues will be of value and benefit to the GMOC. Armida Torres has been a resident of Chula Vista for the past 49 years. Armida was born and raised in Chula Vista, graduated from Chula Vista High School and has raised two grown children in Chula Vista. Armida is the founder and President of Torres Consultants, a real estate development consulting firm. Armida assists private and public clients in market research for real estate and policy analysis on urban development issues. Armida's business expertise in real estate and development will be beneficial to the GMOC. 9 e,c..~1) Mayor and City Council City Of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, Ca 91910 01Y OF 619.691.5044 - 619.476.5379 Fax CHUIA VISTA ,v L MEMO Aprill, 2009 TO: RE: Donna Norris, City Clerk Lori Peoples, Senior Deputy City Clerk Lorraine Bennett, Deputy City Clerk Mayor Cheryl cox~ Jennifer Quijano, Constituent Services Managttf GMOC (Business Representative) VIA: FROM: Mayor Cox would like to recommend Armida Torres for appointment to the GMOC as the Business Representative. Armida will replace Tim Jones. Please place these items on the April 7, 2009 Council agenda for ratification and schedule the oath of office for tile April 21, 2009 Council agenda. Thank you. 4P/o~ _ /lis. eJ"j ~ /orl't:J' dv/c'f' cJr;er 11 of cu,.,.er.f Iy ~'sfq ~ ~ Sf? ~ 01 U:>MI-J.iJJio"'-J, ::::3- " ~(~ ~ ~--=-~ Mayor and City Council City Of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, Ca 91910 619.691.5044 - 619.476.5379 Fax MEMO CllY OF CHUlA VISTA March 27, 2009 TO: FROM: Donna Norris, City Clerk Lori Peoples, Senior Deputy City Clerk Lorraine Bennett, Deputy City Clerk Mayor Cheryl Cox W Jennifer Quijano, Constituent Services Manage~ Cultural Arts Commission and GMOC (Southwest Representative) VIA: RE: Mayor Cox would like to recommend Mary McDermott for appointment to the Cultural Arts Commission and Jim Doud to the GMOC as the Southwest Representative. Mary will replace Susan O'Shaughnessy. Jim will replace Steve Palma. Please place these items on the April 7, 2009 Council agenda for ratification and schedule the oath of office for the April 21,2009 Council agenda, Thank you, .A ~ t:1IV1o-f :;;J.1~.s. ~cJJ""" 4-",/r ~9' - ,ttJC"'7 m c ~ flv .se~ on ~"'1- do /),nf cu--~It /J ~ COMoO,'.$..s;or,\J. dwe, 0~ ~,-.,./r =y