HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1996/02/20 CC MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Tuesday, February 20, 1996 Council Chambers
7:33 p.m. Public Services Building
CALL TO ORDER
1. ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Agency/Council Members Alevy, Moot, Padilia, Rindone, and
Chair/Mayor Hotton
ALSO PRESENT: John D. Goss, Director/City Manager; Bruce M. Boogaard,
Agency/City Attorney; and Vicki C. Soderquist, Deputy City Clerk
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 6, 1996 (joint Redevelopmerit Agency/City Council) and
Febmary 6, 1996 (Special Joint Worksession/Meeting)
MSUC (Horton/Alevy) to approve the minutes nf February 6, 1996 (Joint Redevelopment Agency/City
Council) and February 6, 1996 (Special Jnint Worksession/Meeting) as presented.
CONSENT CALENDAR
None Submitted.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
3. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE 2662 ADDING SECTION 2.43 TO THE CHULA
VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH SUCCESSOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
COMMITTEES TO OPERATE UNDER AUTHORITY OF, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULES
ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TO SERVE AS LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
ADVISORY BOD1ES-oThc Agency adopted Resolution 1309 on 3/16/93 approving revised roles and functions for
the Town Centre, Otay Valley Road, and Southwest Project Area Committees in response to permit streamlining
recommendations by the Economic Development Commission. The revised roles and functions were contemplated
and approved in order to facilitate a more business friendly environment for business development. At its 08/17/93
meeting, the City Council/Redevelopment Agency advised additional action would need to be taken in order to
formally incorporate all Project Area Committees into the "f~,mily" of Boards and Commissions. Staff determined
the most appropriate way to implement this action is to have the proposed ordinance adopted. Staff recommends
the Public Hearing be continued to a date and time certain, that being March 5, 1996 at 4:00 p.m., immediately
followin~ the City Council meeting. (Community Development Director) (Continued from meeting of 2/6/96)
ORDINANCE 2662 ADDING SECTION 2.43 "PROJECT AREA COMSIITTEES" TO THE CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH SUCCESSOR PROJECT AREA COMMITTEES OPERATING
UNDER THE AUTItORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TO SERVE AS LOCAL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT REVIEW ADVISORY BODIES RELATIVE TO REDEVELOPMENT
MATTERS AFFECTING THEIR RESPECTIVE PROJECT AREAS
MSUC (Httrttm/Alevy) to continue the public hearinl~ tit the meeting of March 5, 1996 as requt_.sted by staff.
4. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
TRASH TRANSFER STATION AT 1855 MAXWELL ROAD WITItlN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD
REDEVELOPIV ENT PROJECT AREA--Sexton/Chula Vista Sanitary Service has re, quested per~nission to
construct and operate a materials recovery hcility/transfer station. The Agency is requested to consider adopting
Negative Declaration IS-95-28 and approving plans and entering into an Owner Participation Agreement with John
Sexton Sand and Gravel Company. Staff recommends the Public Hearing be continued to a date and time certain,
that being Tuesday, March 26, 1996 at 6:00 p.m., t'ollowin~ the City Council meetimp. (Administration,
Community Development Director, and Director of Planning)
Minutes
February 20, 1996
Page 2
A. RESOLUTION 1486 ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-95-28, MAKING CERTAIN ,
FINDINGS AND APPROVING A SPECIAL LAND USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
TRASH TRANSFER STATION AT 1855 ~IAXWELL ROAD
B. RESOLUTION 1487 APPROVING PLANS AND ENTERING INTO AN OWNER PARTICIPATION
AGREEMENT WITH JOHN SEXTON SAND AND GRAVEL COMPANY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
A TRASH TRANSFER STATION AT 1855 MAX~VELL ROAD WITH THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
MS {ttorton/Alevy) to continue the public hearing to the meeting uf March 26, 1996 a~q requested by staff.
Me, tuber Moot questioned why the public hearing was being continued to 3/26/96.
Chris Salomone, Director of Community Development, respondexl that the Design Review Committee reviewed the
project one week ago and had a number of concerns. Thereti~re, it was referred back to staff for further review
and would have to return to Design Review for approval. The Prqiect Area Committee would also have to review
the item.
George Krempl, Deputy City Manager, stated that the public hearing process with the DRC and PAC had backed
up the Council/Agency date.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION: (Rindone/Horton) tu cnntinue the public hearing tu March 19, 1996.
Chair/Mayor Horton stated the election was on March 261h and normally the agenda was kept light. She tl.qt there
could be lengthy discussion on the item and supported the continuance to March 19th.
VOTE ON SUBSTITUTE MOTION: apprnved unanimuusly.
ORAL COMMUNI, CATIONS
OTHER BUSINESS
5. DIRECTOR'S/CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S) - None
6. CHAIR'S/MAYOR'S REPORT(S) - None
7. AGENCY/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS - None
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURNMENT AT 7:218 P.M. to a Special Worksession/Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency/City Council
on February 20, 1996 in the City Council Coniferonce Room, City Hall Building, and then to the R~gular
Redevelopment meeting on March 5, 1996 at 4:00 p.m., immediately fi~llowing the City Council meeting, in the
City Council Cham~rs.
RespectfUlly submitted,
by: Vicki C. Soderquist, Dcput~tcrk