HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1995/08/01 (2) MINUTES OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF TIlE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/
CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CrFY OF CtIULA VISTA
Tuesday, Angust 1, 1995 Council Chambers
5:30 p.m. Public Solvices Building
CALl, TO ORDER
1. ROLL CAIA,:
PRESENT: A?2ency/Councll N~clllbcr'; Alevy, M{itlt, Padilia, Rindline, and Chair/Mayor
Hi}rton
ALSO PRESENT: John D. Goss, Dill. trot/City Manager; Bruce M. Boogaard. A~ency/Council
Attm'ncy; anti Beverly A. Authelct, City Clerk
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: None.
BUSINESS
3. Written Cnmmuuicatiuns: Niinc.
4. PUB!,IC IIEARING JOINT REDEVEIX)I'MENT AGENCY/CITY COUNCIL IIEARING
PURSUANT TO TIlE CttULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE AN[) CALIFORNIA HEALTtl AND SAFETY
CODE SECTION 3343 1 AND 33433 REGARI)ING TIt E PROPOSED DISPOSITION BY THE AGENCY OF
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7611 BROAD~,VA Y COMPRISED OF A PPROXII~IATELY 2.53
ACRES TO BROADWAY VILLAGE BUSINESS IIOMES, L.P. AND TIlE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
OF SAID PROPERTY INTO A 36-UNIT MIXED-USE BUSINESS IIOMES PROJECT, SUCH PUBLIC
HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOV¢ING SPECIFIC PROPOSED ACTIONS:--The City Council and
Redevelopment Agency are reqnested to hold the requisite public hearings and take the actions necessary to approve
the Broadway Business Homes Prqiect and authorize exccutilln of a Disposititm and Development Agreement with
Joelea Enterprises (Josef and kenore Citron) fi~r the devehqm~ent of the prqiect. Actions required include a zoning
change for the prqiect from Thoroughthre Comn~ercial ~ll Central ClmnnerciaI-Precise Plan; a Special Use Permit
with Shared Parking Agreement to estahlish the mixed-use prqicct; and approval of a Precise Plan with Conditions
for development of the Prqiect and approval of the DDA, and sale of the property withont public bidding. Staff
recosends the Cormoil and Agency approve the resoh~tions and place the Ordinance on first reading. (Community
Development Director)
I. Review and adoptinn uf MillS;tied Negative Declaratiun and Addendum IS-95-03
2. Appruvul ul'an amendment tu the zoniug map or maps established by Secfiou 19.18.010 of
the Chnhl Vista Muuicipal Code ID reztminR Ibe 2.532 acre parcel lucated at 760 Bruadway
within the Suuthwest Redevch~pment Prnject Area frmn C-T (Cummercial Thuroughthre) to
C-C-P (Cenlral Connuercial x~ith ['recise Plan)
3. Issuance n[ a Special Use Permit to cmlxh'uct a 36-unil cmnmercial/residential mixed-use
prqject with Shared Pan'kinR Agreerecur
4. Appruval uf a Precise Plan tu alhm' consh'ucfion ol' a 36-nnit mixed-use prqject including
associated site inlprnvemen/s
5. Apprnval nr a Disposition ;rod l)evelopment ARrecmeut between the ARehey and Joelea
Enterprises
A. RESOLUTION 17964 AND RESOLUTION 1460 ADORING MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND ADDENDUM IS-95-(}3 FOR A 36-UNIT BUSINESS HOMES PROJECT AT 760
BROADWAY
B, ORDINANCE 2636 AMENDING TIlE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISIIED BY SECTION
19.18.010 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE BY REZONING TIlE 2.53 ACRE PARCEL
LOCATED AT 760 BROADWAY WITHIN TIlE SOUTIIXVEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
~OM C-T (CO~IMERCIAL TItOROUGIIFARE) TO C-C-P, CENTRAL COMMERCIAL WITH PRECISE
PLAN (Fiat Reading)
Minutes
August 1, 1995
Page 2
C. RESOLUTION 1461 MAK1NG CERTAIN FINDINGS AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE
PER~IIT FOR THE DEVELOPI~IENT OF A MIXED-USE PROJECT KN()%VN AS THE BROADWAY
BUSINESS HONIES PROJECT, LOCATED AT 760 BR()AD~VAY WITIIIN THE SOUTHWEST
REDEVELOP~!ENT PROJECT AREA TO BROAD~,VAY VILLA(;E BUSINESS IIOMES, L.P.
D. RESOLUTION 1462 AND RESOLUTION 17965 APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE
BROADWAY BUSINESS HOLMES PROJECT AND A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREElV ENT
WITH BROADWAY BUSINESS HOMES. L.P., AND AUTIIOP, IZING TIlE CItAIR TO EXECUTE SAME
E. RESOLUTION 1463 WAIVINGTIIECONSULTANTSEI.ECTIONPROCESS, AUTIIORIZING
EXECUTION OF A TWO-PARTY AGREEMENT BET~.VEEN TIlE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS FOR SOIL TESTING AND REMEDIATION CONSULTING
SERVICES AT 760 BROADWAY, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS TIIEREFOR--Den~i~Iitiiin of buildings
at the Fuller Ford site will necessitate rem~val of contaminated soils. It will he necessary to have a qnali~ed
hazardous materials consultant present during demolitil~n. Staff recllnnneuds this item be withdrawn frum
consideration. The item will be brougfit fnrwurd ut u future dale clmtiugcnl upnn approval id' a Dispnsitiun
and Development Agreement. (Not a part of the Puhlic Hearing, hut a rdated item. ) (Coalinanity Development
Director)
Chair/Mayor Horton notexl that the pnblic hearing was open.
Dave Gustarson, Deputy Director of Community Develolm~ent. st~ttcd the issue xvas brtulght hack to tile
Agency/Council from the public hearing of 7/25/95. At that mectin~ thcle was clear directtim gr,'en to staff' on the
key issue associated with the prqject, i.e. the ternis of the disposition ill the Agency owned property to the
developer. The developer's response came close to the Agency's posm{uL hut differed m the at'ca tff tile timing
of the demolition. A memo had been placed on the dais ,.vhich id~.ntificd tile dc',eltlpwr's I~roposal on the demolition
issue. The developer was present and prepared tl~ address the Ag~:ncy/Connuil on the issne. Staff had done an
analysis of the developers position, together with the Agency/City Altl,-ney's ilfl'ice, and he helieved the Att,3rney
would recommend that if the Agency/Council wanted to contenlplale the tlevehlpcr's proposal any fistthee that it he
dune in Closed Session.
Mr. Boogaard stated that was correct.
Member Rindone questioned if there was collctlrrullc~ by tile apl~licant to ~hc exact conditions authorized by the
Agency/Conncil fbr negotiation.
Mr. Gustalton responded that they did except Iilr the sssue l~l when demtllitilm ~tntld occur and what would he
secured. There was also some fine tuning iff elements hc I~_.[t ,.v~le consistent ~vith the direclion f'rlnn the
Agency/Council. Direction had been given that the devcllq'~er take dtlv,'n tile prtlpcrty m two pha~;cs, roughly equal,
and to pay $275,000 each up front for those acquisitions. The mimlr mlldification that made it more rational was
that because the property might not be taken down in exactly twll I~hascs of equal stluare tilelilly, c, the amount of
payment for of the parcels would be calculated on a prol~ortilln:ll stirrare tilot hasis. It ,.,.;is dtecfvely the same
thing, but could result in a minor modification in the purchase pric~ ot each I~arcel.
Member Rindone questioned if staff was ready to indicate to the A~ency/Council that th~ full intention and
modifications met the direction of the Agency/Council in tile agreement.
Mr. Gustafson replied staff was not. The tlevehq~er had approached the position the Agcncy/Cottncil articulated
at the last meeting, but he did not f~'el they ,.vc~e cntilcly there. lie h_'lt the Agcncy/('nuncil wonld he well served
to consider the diffi~rences in Closed Sessilln.
Member Rindone stated if the ~dl conditions tit the A~ency/Coun~il ilitd roll hccll timculled ttpttn he wanted to
review those difl~,rences.
Mr. Boogaard stated he was prepared to articttlate those cliHk~renccs in Cltlscd Session.
* * * Council met in Clused Sessiun nt 5:35 p.m. und recl,ovencd at 6:10 p.m. * * *
Minutes
AUgust I, 1995
Page 3
· Josef Citron. 761 Golden Palk. S:m Dic~l ,. ('A, rcllrc,cntin~ J<lclcn EntcTprises, stated they were prepared
to go tbrward and accept tile C(/tlllctJ's Illitlldalc'. the ('it~ Att~tncy's ~t;rdmg. and the Council's wishes so the
prqiect could go ~r~ard.
There being no IBrther public testira{my, the imblic hearing ~as declar~-d closed.
Mr. Boogaard stated Resolutions 1462 and 17965, [tom D~ needed to be amended to authorize the City Attorney
~d City Managa to prepare the lllodilications tt~ the DDA m the. nlanner the Agency/Council previonsly directed
on 7/25/95; ~d, consistent with that, authorize th~ Mayor to execute a DDA and adopt all resolutions and
ordinances on the agenda.
Member Rindone r~lnested that the Agency/City Artre'hey review the terms agreed upon.
Mr. Boog~rd stated the terms in contention would bc that escrow was to be opened, the Agency/Council would
tolerate the six unit financing contingency as a conditi~n Io ch~siug that ~scrow, nnless the applicant wished to waive
it, the escrow would be closed and the City would ~eceix'¢ $275.000 Ji~ the first half of the pn~ject, demolition
would proced and the remedialion would take ph~ce, alld then fl~ey would lake ch~wn the olher half of the property
tBr $275,000.
RESOLUTIONS 17964, 1460, 1461, 17965. AS AMENI)EI), AND 1462, AS AMENDED, OFFERED AND
ORDINANCE 2636 PLACED ON FIRST READING BY MEMBER RINDONE, reading of the text was
waived.
Mr. Boogaard questioned il Item E, Rrs{~luti~m 1463. rcq~ldcd actjim.
Mr. Gustarson responded that the ~sstlc Was Ilot ordinal tfi lhw aclioll hcm~ taken hy tile Agency/Council and staff
r~luested the item be del~rrcd because it was ilot [inlc srnsilivc.
VOTE ON MOTION: apprm'ed 4-1 wilh Ale~) .pposed.
ORAL ('OtMNIIJNI(?ATIONS
· Bill Ayers, 44 East Mallkalo Street, Chula Vihta. CA, infin'mcd Council that the U.S. House of
Representatives had approved tile federal ~unding <if the Chula Vista veterans home.
O'FIIER BUSINESS
5. DIRECTOR'S/CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S) - NIm~'
6. CHAIR'S/MAYOR'S REPORT(S) - N~uv,'
7. AGENCY/COUNCIL MEMBER COMIMENTS - None
ADJOI/RNMENT
ADJOURNMENT AT 6:19 P.M. to the Regular Rcdevchlpm,:nt Agency M~,eting on August 15, 1995 at 6:00 p.m.,
i~ediately [Bllowing the City Cormoil meeting, m the City Council Chanfl~crs.
Respect full> subnfitl~d,
~EVERLY A. AUTHELET, CMC/AAE, City Clerk
Vicki C Sodri-ql~. C~]C, De~it~ Clerk