HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/10/21 Item 2
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
~\ff:. CITY OF
~- (HULA VISTA
OCTOBER 21,2008, ItemL
ITEM TITLE:
Ai'J ORDINAi'JCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AMENDING CHAPTERS 20.04 AND 5.02 OF THE CHULA
VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTIONS
20.04.025 AND 20.04.050 AND A CROSS REFERENCE IN
SECTION 5.02
DIRECTOR O~NSERVATION & ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES. .
-----
INTERIM CITY i'vLA.NAGER 7-)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
SUMMARY
On July 10,2008 City Council approved the Climate Change Program's implementation
plans for seven new measures to reduce Chula Vista's cit)'\vide greenhouse gas or
"carbon" emissions by lowering energy and water consumption, installing renewable
energy systems, promoting alternative fuel vehicles and designing pedestrian and transit-
friendly commlmities. Climate Change Program Measure #3's implementation plan
directs staff to create a new municipal ordinance that encourages businesses to participate
in a free energy and water assessment of their facilities. The proposed ordinance will
assist businesses with identifying opportunities to reduce their monthly utility costs
through a no-cost, voluntary assessment program, which will be integrated into the
business licensing process.
4/5THS VOTE: YES D NO I X I
ENVIRO~MENT AL REVIEW
The .Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project
for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has
determined that the project qualifies for a Class 8 categorical exemption pursuant to
Section 15308 [Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment] of
the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council adopt the resolution.
2-1
OCTOBER 21, 2008, Item?
Page 2 of3
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMlVIENDA nON
Although no formal approvals were solicited, staff made presentations and received
feedback on Measure #3's initial implementation plan at the following municipal
commissions:
Board of Appeals & Advisors
Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation
Design Review Committee
Redevelopment Advisory Committee
Planning Commission
Resource Conservation Commission
DISCUSSION
In 2007, the City Council directed staff to convene a Climate Change Working Group
(CCWG) to develop recommendations to reduce the community's greenhouse gas or
"carbon" emissions. The CCWG - comprised of residential, business and community-
group representatives - evaluated over 90 possible carbon-reducing actions, conducted
more than 30 publicly-noticed meetings, workshops and presentations, and ultimately
recommended seven measures to the City Council. On July 10, 2008 the Council
approved the implementation plans for the seven measures which focused on lowering
energy and water consumption, installing renewable energy systems, promoting
alternative fuel vehicles and designing pedestrian and :transit-friendly communities.
Measure #3 directs staff to develop an ordinance and implement a voluntary program that
encourages businesses to participate in an energy assessment of their facilities that will
assist them in lowering their monthly utility costs and consequently their contribution to
greenhouse gas emissions and climate change impacts. Energy assessments are on-site
evaluations to determine a business's energy use amount and timing. The assessments,
which typically require 30 - 60 minutes to perform, may include a review of a building's
systems (i.e. lighting, cooling and heating), envelope (i.e. exterior windows, doors and
insulation), office equipment, appliances, operational procedures and energy bills. With
the assessment's results, detailed strategies can be recommended to the business to help
reduce their energy consumption through voluntary energy efficiency upgrades and/or
energy-conserving operational changes. Assessments are also a key step in identifying
available incentives, rebates and low cost financing options that will reduce any potential
upfront costs for the business to implement the established energy and cost-saving
improvements. Preliminary water assessments are also conducted at the same time. The
California Energy Commission determined in 2005 that 19% of all energy consumed in
California is used to treat or transfer water and 35% of natural gas consumed is used to
treat, transfer or heat water. Water conservation cannot only contribute to reducing the
impact of our cyclical drought issues in the region; it can be a significant factor in
greenhouse gas reduction and reducing a business's monthly utility costs.
2-2
/
OCTOBER 21, 2008, Item 2-
-
Page 3 of3
The proposed ordinance would codify voluntary business energy assessments by adding a
new section to Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 20.04 (Energy Conservation) and a
cross-reference to Chapter 5.02 (Business Licenses). The proposed ordinance
recommends that new businesses participate in the free energy assessment program when
their initial business license is issued, while existing businesses are encouraged to
participate once every three years when their license is renewed. The ordinance does not
prevent a business from requesting a free assessment from the City more frequently. The
voluntary assessments are recommended for businesses occupying a physical storefront
or office on a commercial energy meter.
While the proposed ordinance does not make energy assessments mandatory for
businesses, staff believes that the inclusion of the voluntary business assessment program
into the municipal code could increase program participation and expand the potential for
immediate carbon emissions reductions. Providing businesses with the opportunity and a
reminder to reassess every three years will ensure that they are provided the most current
information about new energy efficiency technologies (and related incentives) and have
the greatest opportunity to reduce their monthly energy and water costs. Furthermore,
integrating the assessment with the business licensing process provides an
administratively streamlined and cost effective approach to implementation and offers a
more reliable and customer-friendly service for participants.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has determined that the recommendations requmng Council action are not site
specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found ill California Code of Regulations
section 18704.2(a)(l) is not applicable to this decision.
FISCAL IMP ACT
The City, through the Department of Conservation & Environmental Services, currently
offers voluntary business energy assessments supported through a California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC)/San Diego Gas &Electric (SDG&E) grant. Although the
current funding expires on December 31, 2008, staff has been notified by SDG&E that
funding for the assessment program, estimated at $321,400 annually, will continue
through December 31, 2011 (pending CPUC final approval). Therefore, there is no fiscal
impact to the General Fund or the participating businesses. While the CPUC/SDG&E
funds will fully offset the program's costs over the next three year period, staff is also
working to secure a long-term funding source for the business energy assessments and
the other six climate change measures as previously directed by City Council.
A TT ACHMENTS
Attachment A - CCWG Measures' Implementation Plans - July 2008 (Revised)
Prepared by: Brendan Reed, Environmental Resource ;\t{anager, ConseJilation & Environmental Services
2-3
~\f?
~
-~ ---
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF
(HUlA VISTA
CLIMATE CHANGE WORKING GROUP MEAS1JRES
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
July 2008 (Revised)
SUl\1lVL;ffi Y
In May 2007 staff reported to City Council that Chula Vista's citywide greenhouse gas emissions
had increased by 35% (mainly due to residential growth) from 1990 to 2005, while emissions on
a per capita basis and from municipal operations decreased by 17% and 18%, respectively. As a
result, the City Council directed staff to convene a Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) to
develop recommendations to reduce the community's greenhouse gas emissions or "carbon
footprint" in order to meet the City's 2010 greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. The
CCWG - comprised of residential, business and community-group representatives - selected
seven measures which City Council adopted on April 1, 2008. This report outlines City staff's
strategy (summarized in Table 1) to implement the measures and includes an analysis of each
measure's funding needs, tlnancing options, timeline and performance criteria:
Table 1: Summary of proposed cJimate-related programs and their estimated implementation costs
Track progress in reducing carbon emissions through
Administration Emissions Tracking & Reporting IClEI and California Climate Action Registry program $93,300
participation
100% Clean Vehicle Replacement Replace vehicles ttlrough the purchase or lease of $350,000 $160,000
Policy for City Fleet alternative fuel and hybrid vehicles
10Q% Clean Vehicle Replacement Work with current and future vendors to include a "Clean
2 Policy for City-Contracted Fleet Vehicle" replacement policy into the bid and contracting $43,000 $144,000
Services process
Through an ordinance addition, encourage businesses to
3 Business Energy Assessments participate in a no cost assessment as part of the $321,401
business licensing precess
Through a building code revision, require new and
4 Green Building Standard renovated buildings to increase their energy efficiency $235,000 $647,500
and meet statewide green building standards
Provide a cost-effectve, streamlined mechanism far
S Solar & Energy Efficiency property OWners to implement selar and energy efficiency $75,000 $347,801
ConversiQn~ upgrades and create a municipal code requiring pre-
wiring for solar electric systems
6 Smart Growth Around Trolley Implement the 'smart growth' design principles outlined in $620,000
StationsU municipal planning documents
Provide a cost effective, streamlined mechanism for
7 .Outdoor Water Conservation installing water saving plants at private/public sites and $156,380 $705,150
create new municipal landscape regulations
TOTAL 51,479,380 $2,419,152
~ In addition to annual costs presented, implementation of measure #5 woufd require issuance of a pUblic bond to cover upfront capital costs for
solar and energy efficiency upgrades
~." The CIty has already secured approximately $20.3 million for related regional smart growth efforts such as the 1~5 Corridor Study and the
Trolley Grade Separations (E St. & H St.)
CCWO Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council) 1 of 58
July 1,2008
2-4
OVERVIEW
Since the early 1990s, Chula Vista has been engaged in multiple climate change forums
including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the ICLEI Cities for
Climate Protection campaign and the U.S. Conference of Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement
and has pledged to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or "carbon footprint" 20% below
1990 levels by 2010. To accomplish this carbon reduction goal, the City adopted a Carbon
Dioxide (C02) Reduction Plan in 2000 which outlined steps for Chula Vista to reduce energy
consumption, promote alternative transportation and design transit-friendly, walkable
communities.
Recently, staff conducted a GHG emissions inventory for 2005 to evaluate the City's progress in
reaching its emissions goals. The 2005 inventory indicated that Chula Vista's annual citywide
GHG levels had increased by 35% since 1990 due primarily to residential growth. During the
same period, the City did make significant progress in reducing annual per capita emissions by
17% and avoiding nearly 200,000 tons of GHG emissions annually. In addition, GHG emissions
from municipal sources decreased by 18% mainly due to traffic signal energy-efficiency
improvements. As a result of the 2005 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report, the City
Council directed staff to convene a Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) to develop
recommendations to reduce the community's greenhouse gas emissions or "carbon footprint" in
order to meet the City's 2010 greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets.
The CCWG - comprised of residential, business and community-group representatives -
reviewed over 90 possible carbon-reducing measures from July 2007 through March 2008. The
group evaluated these measures based on five primary criteria: I) the measure had been
previously implemented successfully by an ICLEI local government or California Climate
Action Registry business, 2) the measure would be financially feasible (i.e. require little or no
additional General Fund support), 3) the measure could be quickly implemented to have
immediate impact on the City's efforts to reduce emissions by 2010, 4) the measure's impacts
could be quantified using the City's emissions inventory protocol and 5) the measure would not
cause a significant adverse community impact. From this analysis, the CCWG selected seven
measures (see Table I) to recommend to City Council. Council adopted all the measures on
April 1, 2008.
This document outlines the City's general strategy for implementing the seven measures, for
financing their further design and implementation and for tracking the resulting emissions
reductions at municipal operations and citywide scales. In addition, each measure's specitic
implementation plan provides further clarification and includes the following sections:
Overview - A review of the original CCWG recommendation and how it relates to the
proposed program/policy
Program Strategy - An in-depth description of the programmatic approach for
implementing the proposed program/policy including outreach activities and required
municipal code or regulatory steps
Performance ilJetrics - The metrics which will be tracked and reported to quantify the
performance of the program/policy and its impact on GHG emissions
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1, 2008
20[58
2-5
Timeline - A general time line of important milestones as the program/policy is
implemented
Budget & Financing - The required funding to implement the program/policy as
proposed by City staff
STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH
Since City Council approved the Climate Change Working Group's recommendations on April
1, 2008, staff has met with a variety of additional community and stakeholder groups. These
meetings were designed to allow interested parties an opportunity to provide feedback on the
development and implementation of the seven Council-approved measures. Stakeholder groups
included: .
Building Owners & Managers Association
Board of Appeals & Advisors
Brehm Communities
Building Industry Association (Green
Building Task Force)
Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce
(Policy Committee & Board of Directors)
Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation
Community Housing Works
Corky McMillan Companies
Crossroads II
Design Review Committee
Interagency Water Task Force
Jackson Pendo Development Co.
National Association of Industrial &
Office- Properties (Legislative Affairs
Committee)
Northwest Civic Association
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
Otay Ranch Company
Otay Water District
Pacific Southwest Association of Realtors
Pacifica
Planning Commission
ProTec Building Services
Redevelopment Advisory Committee
Resource Conservation Commission
San Diego County Apartment Association
South County Economic Development
Cou'ncil (Transportation Committee)
Sunrise Rotary Club
Suntrek Industries
Sweetwater Authority
Third A venue Village Association (Design
Committee)
3 of 58
2-6
MEASURE #1: HIGH EFFICIENCY OR ALTERNATIVE FUEL
REPLACEMENT VEHICLES FOR THE CITY FLEET
OVERVIEW
Recommendation #1 of the Climate Change Working Group states that the City Council should
"require that 100% of the replacement vehicles purchased for the municipal fleet be high
efficiency (hybrid) or alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs)." Factors such as the appropriateness for
the vehicle task, fueling infrastructure, petroleum displacement, and the overall cost and
environmental benefit must be considered in implementing this recommendation. Although the
initial costs for each replacement vehicle could be higher than a conventional replacement, fuel
savings may offset this initial price difference (ranging between $5,000 for small sedans to
$70,000 for heavy-duty trucks) over the vehicle's lifetime. Some alternative fuels may also be
less expensive than conventional fuels on a price per gallon and price per gasoline-gallon
equivalent.
There are many fuel alternatives available,' and each fuel or technology has pos!tlves and
negatives associated with it. For example, ethanol is more readily available commercially than
some other fuels, but ethanol requires more energy to produce it than it delivers when burned.
Also, the ethanol production process generates greenhouse gases and ethanol production may be
partially responsible for food shortages that are currently driving up the cost and availability of
food. Finally, ethanol fuel has special storage and handling requirements that the City is not
currently capable of meeting.
Hybrid vehicles use less fuel than regular gasoline vehicles, which results in lower exhaust
emissions per mile driven. One negative factor is that hybrid vehicles rely on batteries for part of
their motive power, and those batteries pose an additioqal maintenance expense and disposal
issue. Hybrid vehicles are also more expensive to purchase than regular gasoline powered
vehicles. Therefore, the City is investigating the possibility of leasing hybrid vehicles to avoid
the upfront capital costs and hedge against the resale value of these vehicles as it is unclear what
the resale market for hybrid vehicles will be in five or ten years.
Vehicles that operate on compressed natural gas (CNG) are less readily available for purchase
than hybrids or ethanol fuel vehicles, and there is very little fueling infrastructure in place.
While no American auto manufacturer builds a light-duty vehicle powered by CNG, Honda has
released a commercially-available Civic which uses CNG. The City operates its own CNG fuel
facility at the Public Works Corp Yard (PWC), but the dispensing capacity is not sufficient for
large-scale fueling operations. The cost to up-grade the facility would be several hundred
thousand dollars. Another factor mitigating against purchasing or using CNG powered vehicles
is that the resale value of such vehicles could be low.
Biodiesel is a good alternative to regular diesel fuel. The fuel is created by mixing vegetable fats
from a variety of sources with low sulphur diesel fuel in ratios of up to 1:5 to form B20 biodiesel
fuel. The fuel can be used, in most cases, without modification to existing engines, as long as
certain operating precautions are followed. At present, it will be necessary to increase fuel
storage tank capacity at the Public Works Corp Yard to accommodate biodiesel. The ideal
capacity would be 10,000 gallons for each fuel type.
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July I, 2008
4 of 58
2-7
IMPLElVIENTATION
Implementation of this policy will require a multi-faceted approach. Each alternative fuel or
high efficiency technology has issues that must be considered, such as the carbon footprint of
one type of fuel versus another, or extraneous environmental issues or unintended consequences
that will arise, as a result of actions taken in support of this implementation plan. The three
implementation approaches are:
(1) The Fleet Management Division will replace cars and light-duty trucks with high
efficiency, alternative fuel or ultra-low emissions vehicles as the existing City vehicles
become due for replacement, with careful consideration for the total cost to the Vehicle
Replacement Fund, and ensuring that replacement vehicles are appropriate for their
intended use. This iterative process will take approximately ten (10) years to fully
replace existing light-duty vehicles with alternative fuel or hybrid substitutes. Leasing
vehicles (instead of purchasing) may require a smaller initial capital outlay, shorten the
implementation time and provide greater flexibility to transition to future alternative fuel
or hybrid options.
(2) The existing diesel-fueled vehicles in the City fleet will be converted to operate on
B20 biodiesel. This step can be implemented as soon as fuel storage tank capacity is
addressed, since there is insufficient fuel storage capacity currently available at the Public
Works Corp Yard.
(3) For heavy-duty trucks for which no adequate alternative fuel or high efficiency
technology currently exists, the City will wait to include these vehicle types in the fleet
clean vehicle replacement process. It is unknown at this time what or when technology
will become available in the coming years to convert these vehicles to alternate fuels. In
addition, hybrid heavy-duty trucks are not financiiilly viable at this time. Economies of
scale should cause the incremental price difference to drop dramatically in the near future
as more truck manufacturers offer hybrid or alternative fuel options.
An important consideration in the implementation of this policy is to avoid a large commitment
to any particular alternative fuel or technology, until it becomes clearer what fuel or technology
will be the "fuel of the future" for reasons of environmental benefit, availability and reasonable
cost. It may very well be that hydrogen fuel is financially feasible and readily available within
ten years, though it is not feasible now. Whatever the ideal or best fuel or technology may be, a
large investment by the City in a different fuel or technology would delay migrating to the most
preferred fuel or technology in the future. Although beyond the scope of this implementation
plan, the City may need to consider other policy options (such as video teleconferencing by City
employees) to also help reduce vehicle lIsage and the resulting greenhouse gas emissions.
PERFORi"IANCE METRICS
The new policy's performance will be measured compared to a baseline by the following
metrics: number of hybrid vehicles in the City fleet, number of other alternative fuel vehicles in
the City fleet, number of ultra low emissions vehicles (as defined by the federal and state EPA)
in the City fleet, number of gallons of fuel used (by type), average fuel economy for the City
fleet (by class of vehicle) and the reduction in greenhouse gases emitted by City vehicles.
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July I, 2008
5 of 53
2-8
TIMELINE
The timeline (summarized below) is based upon the basic fleet replacement schedule, and uses
the replacement guidelines contained therein, modified to reflect current economic conditions. It
will take approximately ten (l0) years to completely replace the fleet's car and light-duty truck
vehicles with hybrid or alternative fuel substitutes. Diesel-powered, heavy-duty vehicles will
begin converting to biodiesel once the pertinent infrastructure is installed. More detailed
information regarding the municipal fleet replacement schedule (Appendix A) is also included as
a reference in this document. The schedule assumes the availability of hybrid or alternative fuel
vehicles when vehicle replacement is planned although currently there are not options for all
vehicle types. It is anticipated that availability will improve rapidly in the next few years. In
addition, the schedule does not include police patrol sedans nor special assignment undercover
investigation vehicles. Although police sedans having Flex Fuel capabilities (i.e. able to use
gasoline or ethanol) will be available in 2009, ethanol will not be used as an alternative fuel for
reasons previously mentioned'.
CCWG MEASURE #1: HIGH EFFICIENCY & ALTERNATIVE
FUEL REPLACEMENT VEHICLES FOR CITY FLEET
Implementation Tlmellne
PROGRAM MILESTONES
July '05
._$350k needed to inst;J.11
fueJtanksat<hePWCto
3cccmmodatebiodie'Se!
--Remaining City
sedans &Iicht.cl..ty'
trucks replaced or
leased with hytlntis
orP.FVs
~l
July'12
July'18
. Vehicle Replacement
F'.Jnd needs to be::ldjusted
annuallyto.-erlecthigher
!Jurchasel1';!3se':Jricescf
hytJricsorAFVs
For some off-road construction and maintenance equipment, it will be many years before these
vehicle and equipment classes are replaced in the fleet with newer, less polluting substitutes.
However, for some high usage equipment classes (such as riding lawn mowers and sewer
cleaning trucks), they could be replaced within a relatively short period of time (possibly within'
six years). In both cases, it is highly unlikely that hybrids or alternative fuel replacement options
will be available for those equipment types in the near future. In the interim, diesel-powered
equipment will be operated on B20 biodiesel, as soon as the fuel storage capacity issue is
addressed.
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
6 of 58
2-9
BUDGET & FINANCING
Over the ten years during which vehicles and equipment will be replaced with hybrid and/or
alternative fuel substitutes, the cost difference between purchasing "clean" vehicles and regular
gasoline/diesel vehicles is estimated to be $1.6 million (averaging $160,000 annually). In
addition, approximately $350,000 will be required to install tanks to provide biodiesel fueling
opportunities. Appendix B (attached) outlines the incremental cost difference each year. It is
expected that incremental pricing will, decline over time as the technology becomes more
widespread and more hybrid 'models become available for purchase. The program's budget is
outlined below: .
CCWG #1 . Clean Vehicle Replacements tor City Fleet. Budget
AFV/Hybrid Replacement Premium
$160,000
Biodiesel Fuel Tanks
$350,000
TOTAL $350,000
$160,000
The Vehicle Replacement Fund will need to be adjusted beginning this year, to ensure that
sufficient funds are available to implement measure # 1. At present, the Vehicle Replacement
Fund is under. funded and currently only has a fund balance of approximately $950,000. Charges
to vehicle user departments must be adjusted to reflect the higher purchase prices that will be
experienced as hybrid or alternative fhel vehicles are assimilated into the fleet. This will have a
negative impact on the General Fund, since the majority of fleet vehicles are operated by General
Fund departments. Projections for the next two or three fiscal years show that there will not be a
large number of hybrid vehicles brought into the fleet, based upon recently revised vehicle
replacement schedules. Therefore, the immediate impact on the Vehicle Replacement Fund will
not be significant. Furthermore, municipal fuel cost savings (estimated at $306,277 over 10
years based on current fuel prices) from incorporating alternative fuel and higher efficiency
vehicles into the fleet will offset a portion of the increased replacement costs.
CCWO Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
7 of 58
2-10
MEASURE #2: ENCOURAGE CITY-CONTRACTED FLEET
OPERA TORS TO ADOPT THE USE OF HIGH EFFICIENCY (HYBRID)
OR AL TERNA TIVE FUEL VEHICLES
OVERVIEW
Climate Change Working Group's recommendation #2 states that "the City ofChula Vista work
with fleets under City authority to influence their expanded use of alternative fuels and high-
efficiency/alternative fuel vehicles including electric, biodiesel, ethanol, hybrid, hydrogen and
natural gas based on appropriateness for vehicle task, fueling infrastructure, petroleum
displacement, overall cost and environmental benefit." Generally, the implementation of this
policy will requir~ amendments to the City's contracting and bid specifications, requiring
contractors to incorporate high efficiency (hybrid) and alternative fuel vehicles into their fleet
when new contracts are negotiated. The effectiveness of this implementation is dependant upon
the alternative fuels infrastructure and vehicle classes in which there are operationally-practical,
technically-feasible hybrid or alternative thel options.
Staff had already begun discussions concerning alternative fuels and hybrid/alternative fuel
vehicles with some of the City contractors prior to the Climate Change Working Group's
recommendation. City staff reviewed current contracts and permit processes in relationship to
this climate protection measure. Each of these permitted or contracted fleets' implementation
status is detailed below.
IlYlPLEMENTATION
Transit
In FYI998/99, City COlincil authorized staff to convert the Chula Vista Transit (CVT) fleet from
diesel to Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). The first defivery of 15 full-size CNG buses took
place in 2001 and I o more arrived in 2002. In 2005, seven mid-size CNG buses were delivered.
Six of these buses were incorporated into the Transit fleet and one was turned over to the Nature
Center to be utilized as their shuttle. The current Transit fleet, as summarized in Table 2 below,
now consists of 37 buses of which 31 buses are CNG.
Table 2: Current Transit Fleet Inventory
Year Fuel Type No. of Buses
Bus Type
30' Low Floor 2005 CNG 6
40' Low Floor 2001 CNG 10
40' Low Floor 2000 CNG IS
40' Low Floor I 2000 Diesel(l) 2
35' High Floor 1995 Diesel") 2
40' High Floor 1991 Diesel") I
35' Hicrh Floor 1991 Diesel") I
TOTAL 37
() Will remain in fleet. Needed to meet 20% spare ratio.
(2) Scheduled for replacement. .
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July!,2008
8 of 58
2-11
Street Sweeping
Cannon-Pacific, the City's contracted street sweeper, currently operates three street sweepers
within City limits. The contractor is looking into alternative fuel trucks and related fueling
options available for street sweepers and has expressed interest in using alternative fuel vehicles
within the current contract term, which may require "significant" contract amendments. Cannon-
Pacific fully understands the need for alternative fuel vehicles and is willing to work with the
City of Chula Vista to comply with climate protection measure #2.
Trash Hauler
The City's contract with Allied Waste Services is in its first eight-year contract extension, which
expires June 30, 2015. There is a "Clean Fuel Source" clause in the current contract with Allied
Waste Services:
6.2.24 Clean Fuel Source. Pacific shall develop a pilot project/or Collection vehicle replacement or
conversion to a clean fuel service in cooperation with City within 180 days which identifies
Collection vehicles for conversion and provides that conversion will occur if City and Pacific can.
identify outside funding to pay for (a) the vehicle conversion, (b) incremental cost of new vehicles
and (c) costs for a centrally located fueling station. Pacific or its Affiliate will promptly implement a
program regarding the purchase of new clean fuel source (u., E-rated electricity, propane, natural
gas, liquid natural gas, hydrogen fuel cell, eNG, or equivalent clean power and fuel source) for non-
Collection support vehicles and on-site equipment using gasoline or diesel (such as fork lifts or
generators) upon the replacement of such support vehicles and on-site equipment. Pacific will
immediately establish service with a California Green E Utility provider for its on-site electrical power
source needs at Chula Vista facilities. City shall permit Pacific and its AJfiliates to purchase cIeanfl.lel
sources from City at a price that does not include any profit for City.
Allied Waste Services began using biodiesel (B20 Blend) seven years ago and more recently
began adding a fuel reformulator, Ethos RF, to improve fuel efficiency and reduce emissions
(non-greenhouse gas). This fuel combination, in tandem' with all the California Air Resources
Board-required equipment (such as particulate traps and catalytic converters), has reduced their
opacity readings fleet-wide by 74.5% since 2001 and already placed them in full compliance
with 2010 air emission standards. Allied Waste Services operates 52 collection vehicles in the
City of Chula Vista.
Taxis
The City does not currently contract with any taxi service, but does license taxis to operate
within the City's boundaries. In order to obtain a license to perform taxi service within Chula
Vista, the cab company must submit their cab(s) to a thorough vehicle inspection and fill out the
required licensing paperwork with the City of Chula Vista Police Department's Traffic
Enforcement Unit. Of the 179 taxi cabs that are currently licensed to operate within the City of
Chula Vista, approximately 51 % of the taxis are independently owned and operated. The
remaining taxis belong to one of three different taxi cab companies: Red Cab (45 taxis), Eritrean
Cab (23 taxis) and Yellow Cab (20 taxis).
In discussions with the three major cab companies, City staff learned that the companies do not
directly purchase vehicles, rather they independently contract with individuals to provide
insurance, dispatching and name recognition. It is up to each individual cab owner to replace
his/her vehicle. All three companies indicated that currently moving to alternative fuels is
problematic because there is not an established network of fueling infrastructure to support
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July t, 2008
9 of 58
2-12
vehicle fleets throughout San Diego County. In the past, Yellow Cab tried switching their fleets
to CNG but frequently had their vehicles running out of fuel due to the limited infrastructure. As
a result, their towing expenses increased dramatically and they reverted back to conventional fuel
vehicles.
Another obstacle to incorporating "clean" vehicles into the taxi fleet is the cost increase to
individual cab operators. Taxi vehicles are .typically purchased as used vehicles. By requiring
new AFV!Hybrid vehicles to be purchased instead, operators would not be able to make enough
revenue to offset the cost premium of purchasing the new vehicle. This could result in low-er
service levels within City limits which may directly affect Chula Vista residents and businesses.
Tow Trucks
The City currently contracts with four tow companies to provide police-initiated tows such as
vehicle accident removal, abandoned vehicle removal, negligent vehicle impounds and towing
inoperable department vehicles. Staff met with the tow companies to discuss alternative fuel or
hybrid options for their fleets. Because the majority of tow vehicles use diesel-based engines,
the only practical alternative fuel option for the tow fleet at this time is biodiesel. The closest
biodiesel fueling station toChula Vista is off Interstate 15 at EI Cajon Boulevard. Because of the
distance (approximately 10 miles) and the limited operating hours (7 am - 10 pm), this is not an
economically or environmentally feasible option. Until the appropriate fueling infrastructure is
built in Chula Vista, biodiesel use is impractical for the tow truck fleet. For the few non-diesel
based tow vehicles, there currently are no alternativelhybrid options for these sized vehicles.
However, manufacturers of larger trucks are now developing hybrid vehicles which ultimately
could be placed into fleet use sometime in the future.
The current contract with the tow companies expires June 30, 2011. As a new contract is
eventually pursued, staff will reassess local biodiesel availability and other relevant AFV!Hybrid
replacement options. If there are feasible options, language will be added to the Request tor
Proposals outlining the City's Policy for AFV!Hybrid vehicles.
PERFORMANCE M;ETRlCS
As a performance measure, the City will require an annual vehicle list from contractors which
may contain, but is not limited to, the vehicle fleet number, make, model, age and fuel type of
each vehicle. Through this annual inventory, the City will be able to track each contractor's
progress in incorporating hybrid and alternative vehicles into their fleets.
TIMELINE
Transit
The Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) has approved the funds to purchase six additional CNG
buses for the Chula Vista Transit fleet during CY 2009 which will result in 95% of the fleet
being powered by an alternative fuel. Additionally, Chula Vista and MTS are under the
California Air Resource Board's (CARB) Alternative Fuel Path, which commits both agencies to
purchase only alternative fuel buses. Chula Vista Transit's contractor, Veolia Transportation.
Inc., has also committed to purchasing five (5) hybrid vehicles for their road supervisor staff.
The implementation time line for transit vehicle replacement is summarized below:
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
10 of 58
2-13
CCWG MEASURE if2: ENCOURAGE CITY-CONTRACTED FLEET OPERATORS
TO ADOPT THE USE OF HIGH EFFICIENCY OR ALTERNATIVE FUEL
VEHICLES
Implementation Timeline
TRANSIT. PROGRAM MILESTONES
'InitioljJurchase
aflSftJU.size
CNGbuses'n
2001
. \0 full.si:z:~
CNGbuses
purchased in
2002
o7mir.f..sizeCNG
buses purchased in
2005
'MTStDf;:urchaseli
moreCNGbusesin
2009
July '01
July '0.5
/
/July'o.9
,
'MTS trilnsitpravider. VaoHa
Transportation, inc., has
corrmltteoto iJurchasinghybrid
veniclesforsr.;~rviscrs(5)
. HydrogenlCNG blend - 2 buses to
lle recalibrated for 201BO fuel blend
via grant from Congressman Filner's
office
Street Sweeping
Cannon-Pacific is willing to start converting to alternative fuel vehicles prior to the end of their
current contract term which expires June 30, 2011. The implementation timeline for street
sweeper vehicle replacement is summarized below:
CCWG MEASURE if2: ENCOURAGE CITY-CONTRACTED FLEET OPERATORS
TO ADOPT THE USE OF HIGH EFFICIENCY OR ALTERNATIVE FUEL
VEHICLES
Implementation Timeline
STREET SWEEPERS. PROGRAM MILESTONES
I \
July'O~
\
\
,
\
I
July '0.9
I
July '10.
I
July'12
. Initial discussionWlL'1
cantrnc:orabou[CCWG
me3sure&future
equipment conversion
.NewcontraCt$Wlttl
altemativeruelorhigh
efficiencyvehicie
requirement begins
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
IlofSS
2-14
Trash Hauler
Over the last two years, Allied Waste has continued to evaluate biodiesel suppliers who could
provide a consistent, high quality fuel source. One potential source is a company called New
Leaf which is building a biodiesel manufacturing facility in Otay Mesa. The facility will use
cooking oil as its fuel base. Allied Waste Services has already begun to meet with New Leaf to
work on establishing standards and a possible purchasing agreement. The implementation
time line for trash hauler vehicle replacement is summarized below:
CCVVG MEASURE #2: ENCOURAGE CITY-CONTRACTED FLEET OPERATORS
TO ADOPT THE USE OF HIGH EFFICIENCY OR ALTERNATIVE FUEL
VEHICLES
Implementation Timeline
TRASH HAULERS. PROGRAM MilESTONES
. CQntrac:or began use of
biodiesel In collecrionvehicles
i'nr City comrac!
'l~ContractextenSlonflJrayears
July '01
July '04
July '07
July '10
Ju '15
. Resrnrtingbiodieselirom
mOD;consi::tentsupplier ~
November200a
. Ne:<<conlractrenewal
dateJulyl,21J15
. Contn.ctor received bad load
,"fbiodiese!whichcaused
majortleetprotlems-
clogged fuel systems.
Taxis
The timeline for transitioning taxi vehicles to AFV Ihybrids is unknown due to the reasons stated
above (cost effectiveness & fueling infrastructure).
Tow Trucks
When the current tow services contract expires in June 2011, there should be greater biodiesel
availability in Chula Vista as well as greater availability of other MV /Hybrid truck options
capable of performing tow operations.
BUDGET & FINANCING
While there is some grant funding available for specific equipment/models and conversions, it is
expected that there will be some cost increases or longer contract terms required for contractors
to be able to amortize the capital investments from complying with the City's "clean" vehicle
replacement policy. The program's budget is outlined below:
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
12 of 58
2-15
;;,.
CCWG #2 - Clean Vehicle Replacements for City-Contracted
Fleets - Budget
HCNG Blend Project - Buses
$144,000
H21CE - Van
$43,000
TOTAL
$43,000
$144,000
Transit
The Metropolitan Transit System has approved the funds to purchase six CNG buses for Chula
Vista Transit which are anticipated to arrive in 2009. The City has received a $738,000 earmark
from Congressman Bob Filner's office for a Hydrogen/Compressed Natural Gas (HCNG) blend
project. Two CNG buses will be recalibrated to operate on a 20!80 HCNG fuel blend. Using the
HCNG blend reduces all emissions. An immediate and significant benefit comes from a 50%
reduction in nitrogen oxides (NOx) compared to CNG. Approximately $5,000 - 6,000 per bus!
month will be required to produce the hydrogen required to operate the buses. Transit.funds will
continue to be able to fund the CNG fuel use, but additional funds will be needed to cover the
incremental cost of the hydrogen production.
Ford Motor Company has provided the City one (I) experimental Ford Hydrogen Internal
Combustion Engine (H2ICE) 12-passenger shuttle van, which will be based on the Ford E450
platform for the purpose of aiding both Ford and the City to demonstrate and evaluate the
performance characteristics of such a vehicle. The City of Chula Vista proposes to use the
H2ICE as the transportation means for visitors to the Chula Vista Nature Center. The cost of
electricity to generate the hydrogen by the City's hydrogen electrolyzer is estimated at $2,400
per month. The extended cost over the term ofthe project is estimated to be $43,000.
Street Sweeping
Cannon-Pacific has expressed an interest in starting the alternative fuel vehicle implementation
within the current contract term, which may require "significant" contract amendments such as
additional fees or costs.
Trash Hauler
Allied Waste Services has recently submitted a grant application to the Air Pollution Control
District's Carl Moyer Fund to purchase 25 CNG trucks and a fueling station for its Chula Vista
fleet. They are also researching the feasibility of using landfill methane gas for fueling purposes.
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008 .
13 of 53
2-16
MEASURE #3: BUSINESS ENERGY ASSESSMENTS
OVERVIEW
The measure, as adopted by City Council, would encourage through a new municipal ordinance
commercial and industrial businesses to participate in an energy assessment of their premises
The measure is intended to help businesses identify energy efficiency opportunities at their
facilities and, if desired, take advantage of applicable rebate and incentive programs for energy
efficiency improvements. The assessments, which would be offered at no cost, would only apply
to businesses with a physical storefront and/or office and would be encouraged when a new
license is issued or every three years for a renewed business license. The business energy
assessment process is graphically summarized below:
CCWG MEASURE #3: BUSINESS ENERGY ASSESSMENTS
Implementation Plan Summary
,
PROGRAM ,
, PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
DEVELOPMENT ,
,
, FOR EXISTlN3 UCENSES:
,
, Business ASRlument NotJco
,
, (November)
, BlJ$/ness As.:scssment
, . Sent in conjunctionwrt:h NrnicI:J
lWunicip<lJCode Revisions , Finance Dep3rtment's :lf1nual
, Scheduling P~ried (WIthin Calendar Y~ar)
, business license r~ne',val notice
'Arr.endrr,entroCh:'lj:ter]O , (30 days) . City staff performs energy
Energy Conservation of the , assessment &. revie\l'l
Municipa!code , . BTJsinesssels <lssessment ~ resultsVllith business
, appointment
. Possible cross references , representative
added to sectcn5 ,)11.5.0.:.1 , . Assessment c::m ecrur . City s::aff assists CLlSLrless
cf8usines'i: Ucense code , ~me durfng their reguiar
, \I'.fIthenergyefficiel'1c,/
. Public Reading$3nd review , FOR (lj8N UCEI\,fSES: hcursofopention incentive and reoate
periods , application atthediscretion
, Business Assessment Notkc
, of the bu'Siness
, (Deoendent af i"l.pplication
,
, Submittal Dare)
, .P.pplicantnotifiedofassessment
,
, when new business license is
, i'5:$ued
,
,
,
,
,
IMPLEMENTATION
The Department of Conservation & Environmental Services will administer the program with
anticipated support provided by the Finance (Business License Division) and Information
Technology Services (IT Programming Division) Departments. Staff is recommending that the
business energy assessment be codified through Title 20 - "Energy Conservation" of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code (see Appendix C for example of conservation-focused municipal code
applying to all Chula Vista businesses). Specifically, the municipal code would be augmented to
include the following concepts:
All commercial and industrial businesses in the City of Chula Vista are encouraged to
cooperate with City staff or their delegate to conduct a free energy assessment of their
facilities when a new business license is issued or once every three years for an existing
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July I, 2008
14 of 58
2-17
license by providing; I) a date and time for the assessment convenient for the business, 2)
access to their facilities for the assessment during their regular business hours, 3)
authorization (voluntary) to access their Energy Waves account (a San Diego Gas &
Electric energy analysis tool), and 4) a signature and title of a facility manager on a
completed assessment form acknowledging that the business has received a completed
assessment and relevant information about potential energy efficiency improvements to
implement at the business's discretion. For multi-tenant commercial buildings, the
property manager may authorize a whole building assessment replacing the need for
individual tenant assessments.
Assessment Notification Process: The City will send a written notice to each business at
least once every three years in conjunction with the City's annual business license
renewal mailer informing the business of the opportunity for a free energy assessment
and providing information that allows a business to schedule an appointment at their
convenience. A business shall also receive a business assessment notice whenever a new
business license is required such as the establishment of a new business or transfer of
ownership for an existing business.
Assessment Deliverables: The assessment findings shall be provided to the business on a
form established by the City Manager in conjunction with the local utility and business
representatives, including a chart of their energy consumption over the past 18 months
(extracted from their Energy Waves account) and an estimate of their potential energy
and financial savings as well as the corresponding greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions
based on state-approved GHG accounting protocols. The assessment may also review
alternative transportation options which the business could implement and/or promote to
its employees and customers and the resulting GHG reductions. The City shall provide
any available forms and an offer of assistance to complete the forms and process for
accessing available state and/or local rebates that reduce the cost of implementing the
voluntary energy efficiency improvements.
Businesses are not required to implement improvements, however, businesses may at
their discretion request additional assistance from the City or its designee to be trained on
how to use Energy Waves and implement any or all of the measures selected by the
business as the most cost effective choices for reducing energy consumption. The City
shall also provide contact information for the local Utility's Account Executive or other
staff designated by the Utility for a specific program that may assist the business in
reducing its energy costs.
Exemotions: An energy assessment may not be necessary for new businesses occupying
a commercial space which has completed one of the following: I) been permitted by the
City Building Division within three years for a remodel or new-construction to meet the
most current City Title 24 and above standards, 2) has been certified through a California
Energy Commission-certified (or other applicable state agency) green building program,
or 3) has already received an assessment within the last three years. In addition,
Assessments are not necessary for home offices, mobile businesses and other business
entities that do not have a utility gas or electric meter on a commercial rate schedule.
CCWO Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
150f58
2-18
PERFORMANCE METRICS
The business energy assessment program's perfor'mance will be measured by a suite of metrics
including the number of assessments performed, number of energy efficiency improvements
identified and the corresponding potential kWhfTherm savings. In addition, the number of
businesses implementing new alternative transportation policies or programs will be tracked.
Staff will investigate the possibility of receiving aggregated customer information from SDG&E
to quantifY the number and amount of incentive funds solicited as a result of the business
assessment process.
In the City's current greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory protocol, the business sector's carbon
emissions are directly quantified by extrapolating business energy use from aggregated
community data provided by SDG&E. While the proposed program does not require businesses
to adopt energy efficiency improvements, it does help them to understand and apply for SDG&E
rebate and incentive programs that could lead to increased energy conservation. Over the last
two years, City staff has visited over 2,000 businesses and identified over 800,000 kWh in
potential annual energy savings (equivalent to over 700,000 lbs of carbon emissions) as part of
the current program. Encouraging an energy assessment as part of. the business license renewal
process will greatly expand the potential for immediate emissions reductions and provide
opportunities for businesses to lower their monthly energy costs.
TIMELINE
Implementation would require an amendment to Chapter 20 "Energy Conservation" of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code and potentially a cross reference amending the Business License code
sections (5.02 & 5.04). Ordinance notice, first reading and second reading would take
approximately 40 days. Some items may require review by other agencies which may also take
an estimated 45 to 60 days. The program's time line is summarized below:
CCWG MEASURE #3: BUSINESS ENERGY ASSESSMENTS
Implementation Plan Tlmellne
PROGRAM MILESTONES'
Jan'09
dug '08
'Oraft&pr~sent!O .N~SQG&E
P3rtnershipfunding
Councilmunicioal '::legins&continues
codernvis:cns throUl;hOec'll
. ,
I I I
uly'Oa Jar '09 July'
00,'08 Ncy'OS Jao'09
. Hire &tr3in statf -Notices sent to . Business
.Oevelop:;:rogr-3m businesses &. assessments:Jegin&
materials ass~s"T1ent continuethrnugr,out
scnediJlingbegins year
09
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1, 2008
16 of 58
2-19
BUDGET & FINANCING
The proposed program's implementation cost is estimated to be $321,400 per year in staffing,
supplies and services (summarized in table below). This program cost assumes full funding of
all seven CCWG measures and will leverage each measure's "budget to provide partial cost
sharing of staff time and program materials. For example, staff visiting businesses to perform
energy assessments will also be able to promote other climate-related programs such as the Solar
Conversion (CCWG Measure #5) and Turf Lawn Conversion (CCWG Measure #7) programs
leading to lower implementation costs for each program and increased program participation. A
portion of each measure's budget will also partially cover overall administrative and
performance tracking costs associated with the City's climate protection efforts. The program's
budget is outlined below:
CCWG #3 . Business Energy Assessment. Budget
City Staff
$111,600
$146,800
Interns
Marketing
$16,000
Other Commodities
$47,000
TOTAL
$321,400
"'Assumes cost sharing between CCWG Measures #3, 5 & 7
Probable funding by SDG&E/CPUC through Dec 2011
The City, through the Department of Conservation & Environmental Services, currently offers a
voluntary business energy assessment program which is funded through a California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC)/San Diego Gas &Electric (SDG&E) grant through December 31,
2008. The grant only provides funds for the assessments and not incentives for businesses to
implement the identified energy efficiency improvements. Staff has submitted a new grant
proposal to the CPUC/SDG&E to continue funding the business assessment program through
December 31, 2011. To ensure the program continues beyond future grant funding cycles, staff
"would recommend that the program should be funded through a more broadly applied Fee
Authority structure. A Fee Authority would provide staff with greater flexibility to address
future business growth and increased personnel and supply costs as the program and economy
evolve.
CCWO Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
17 of 58
2-20
MEASURE #4: GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
OVERVIEW
The City of Chula Vista Climate Change Working Group's (CCWG) recommendation #4 urges
the City to adopt community-wide green building standards that are comprehensive in coverage
and mandatory. The CCWG recommended that new and substantially renovated structures be
required to be built to LEED Silver or to an equivalent third-party certification green building
program, with the effect of having an energy efficiency impact of at least 20% over current Title
24 requirements. However, there is not a straight-line relationship between green program
certification or Title 24 performance and carbon reductions. For this reason, City staff
recommends an approach that focuses directly on carbon emission reductions. Reductions in
energy use by buildings are among the easiest carbon-reducing actions to quantify and lessen the
community's "carbon footprint."
As approved by City Council, Chula Vista will implement a citywide, mandatory green building
standard for new construction and major renovations. The new standard will have 3 main
components: (1) a minimum energy efficiency (carbon equivalent) requirement of 15% above
Title 24 - 2005, (2) the early adoption of the new California Green Building Codes for all
residential and commercial projects and (3) a Carbon Offset Fee available for projects not
meeting the 15% above Title 24 threshold. The City will re-evaluate its Green Building Standard
in summer 2009 when the revised Title 24 becomes effective. The Chula Vista Green Building
Standard will complement green building measures at the state and national level, and place a
high priority on reducing the carbon emissions of buildings in Chula Vista. The innovative
program provides an equitable solution for new and retrofit, as well as residential, industrial and
commercial buildings. Furthermore, the proposed program meets, and in the case of commercial
projects exceeds, the initial reduction targets outlined, by Architecture 2030, a nationally-
recognized movement in the building/architectural community to make new buildings "carbon
neutral" by 2030 (Appendix D).
IMl'LEMENTATION
The City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department, Building Division, is responsible for
confirming that all commercial, industrial and residential construction projects meet the
minimum requirements of the State and locally mandated construction codes. They also provide
plan check and associated inspections. The Planning Division is responsible for promulgating
policy and regulations and administering them for land use, site design and zoning. Building
Codes, land use policies, zoning ordinances and design guidelines all can contribute to the goal
of meeting this objective. The Chula Vista Green Building Standards program will focus on
reducing carbon emissions and contains the following four components: (1) Develop and
implement a Chula Vista Building Carbon Reduction Benchmark Program, (2) Early adoption of
the California Green Building Code, (3) Preparation and Implementation of a Green Awareness
program for homeowners and building operators, and (4) Adoption of new zoning ordinances
and design guidelines. The implementation process is graphically depicted below:
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
18 of 58
2-21
CCWG MEASURE #4: GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
Implementation Plan Summa'Y
Building Corbon
Reduction Benchmark
program
. Develop and ~..abl[Sh the
goals,objectivessnd
lhresho!ds for caroon reduction
oIJevelop an energy seving3
COI'TlI"onert that ernr;:haSize3
c:ommunrtyfsde design
guidelines and energy
effiCiency
-Prepme guidefines lor budding
permit review and ret!ne the
Dnit Carboo Reduction
Checklist
. Evslu.!lte and develop It
mitigsllon fee component
Green Building Standards Program
. ProlT'des the quart!t'.ahla reduc!ion of carbon emi!;sions fer
residential, ltidustrial $f'ld commerCial bUildings
. compllmerrt.'! the rnea$l.Jl'es at a ~ate and netloMllevel end reduceS
the r;ommun~y'3 'csrbon tootprint.~
Early Green Building
COde Adoption
. Adopt the Califorrm Oreen
8l.lilding Code prior to
implementation of January
201'
. Adopt a Fl1lclings 01 Fad: in
ac~'l'\olthlMHe:l.~h
and Safety Code 17SSa.5
and.6
Gre'ln Awa.~n.$s
Program
. Prepare and implement an
education and outr~
program for homll':OVVOel's and
buildingopera!:oM:
. CcorcHl'lale and coI!a1:1oral:e
wrth soo..e.e lor prnmotionel
"n,,"
POlley GUideline. and
Regulatory
Amendments
. Upd~e AQIP guidelines to
ilTlplement ~re~ buildi'lg
st&nd8rd.s lor !Mge-xs!e
~ment
. Prepsre !In." addilioMl policy
program guidelk"leslo addr~
smaller dCVelopmert or A832
reqti'ement~
o Amet'ld!lppMcable
development regulelioM (i.e.
toning code design guideHne~,
GMOC ordlnancelguklelines or
municipal code to implement
Carbon Reduction Program
Development of a Building Carbon Reduction Benchmark Program
Staff will work to develop and implement a Building Carbon Reduction Benchmark Program,
which would recommend that all new construction ~nd remodels reduce and document
reductions in carbon emissions compared to the minimum'results that would be achieved through
compliance with the applicable version of California Title 24 energy standards. The proposed
program will allow developers the flexibility to determine how best to meet these requirements,
which will offset the burden associated with meeting an additional procedural requirement. This
program would provide a level playing field for new and retrofit, as well as residential, industrial
and commercial buildings, and would help accomplish the goals of the Chula Vista CO,
Reduction Plan.
In coordination with stakeholders, staff would begin with developing the framework of the
Building Carbon Reduction Benchmark Program to attain 15% greater carbon reduction than
current Title 24 requirements and establish the goals, objectives and proposed thresholds to
accordingly reduce overall carbon emissions for all new development. Staff will then prepare an
energy savings component that includes both c.ommunity/site design guidelines and energy
efficiency measures. As a part of this effort, staff will prepare guidelines for building permit
review and further refine and/or supplement the Chula Vista Carbon Checklist (Appendix E).
This checklist shows emission reductions for various Development Credits as well as Energy
Efficiency Credits for both Prescriptive and Performance Paths. As a part of this program, staff
will evaluate a range of proposed carbon emission thresholds. As an example, proposed
.thresholds may require a reduction in carbon emissions of 15 pounds per 100 square foot in
Climate Zone 7 and a reduction of35 pounds per 100 square foot in Climate Zone 10 based on
the applicable version of Title 24. Chula Vista straddles two different climate zones. The bulk
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1, 2008
2-22
190f58
of the City rests within Climate Zone 7 while the far east of the City is in the more rigorous
Climate Zone 10 (Appendix F). These values represent the approximate carbon savings achieved
when exceeding Title 24 by 15%. The Chula Vista Carbon Reduction Checklist will need to be
completed by the builder for each permit.
The savings can be accomplished in two different areas: (I) community/site design and (2)
energy efficiency. The first typically applies to larger scale projects, and the Planning and
Building Department will ensure that future long range plans such as Specific Plans and
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plans include community/site design and energy efficiency
components through policy and regulatory changes as presented in the "Policy Guidelines and
Regulatory Amendments" section. Community/site design features generally manifest carbon
savings through reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and associated tail pipe emissions, by
increasing emphasis on other travel modes such as walking and transit use through means
including: expanded pedestrian/bike connections, expanded transit plans, mixed-use
development, and increased density. Additional efficiency can also be gained through site
design features that optimize the potential for renewable and advanced energy-efficient
technology uses (i.e. solar orientation, cogeneration and district energy systems).
While all of these features can lead to carbon savings, the establishment of baselines and the
quantification of savings for community design measures are less direct than with energy
efficiency measures, and at present there are not well established metrics. This is one of ~he
primary focuses of the active Chula Vista Research Project (CVRP) with the National Energy
Center for Sustainable Communities (NECSe). The CVRP/NECSC team is currently
conducting studies to produce a set of clear modeling assumptions, a detailed description of their
methodology and specific emission reduction values for alternative community/site design
features. Their work will not be completed for several months. Staff will also need to carefully
work with the CVRP outputs and the NECSC team to define and establish these baselines and
features, and balance their use along with desired energy efficiency savings. To accomplish
development of the community/site design component of the Green Building Standards Program,
staff envisions a multi-step process which will include the following: (I) establishment of a
community/site design Working Group, (2) scoping and evaluation workshops, (3) compose a
draft standard and conduct a rating simulation, (4) revise the draft standard and solicit
stakeholder input and (5) complete and issue the final community/site design standard for
Council consideration as part of the overall Green Building Standards Program. Individual
project savings will need to be quantified by the developer or builder with PLACE'S,
Community Viz, URBEI\IUS or other appropriate software used to calculate energy generation
and efficiency options as a function of land use and development choices as determined through
the CVRP. The Planning and Building Department will evaluate the~e products to determine
which is preferable for use in the Program.
Builders will also be able to accumulate carbon savings through energy efficiency. There will be
three avenues for them to accomplish this: (I) a prescriptive path where the builder selects
features that will deliver the necessary savings, (2) a performance path where the builder uses
California Energy Commission-approved software to quantifY the energy savings (and thus
carbon savings) of specific efficiency measures and (3) renewable energy production. The
prescriptive path is available to residential construction and remodels; however, commercial
buildings must follow the performance path. The third method for builders to reduce carbon
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
20 of 58
2-23
emissions is to include on-site renewable energy. Technologies that shall qualifY include: solar
photovoltaic systems, solar hot water systems, geothermal systems (geoexchange) and small
scale wind turbines. The building will be credited with carbon savings based on the size of the
system installed. This compliance method will be available to all building types. The City will
re-evaluate the Green Building Standard's 15% threshold in summer 2009 when the revised Title
24 becomes effective.
The program will include a mitigation fee component should a builder choose or otherwise not
be able to effectively meet the additional CO2 savings requirement on-site. The fee will equate to
the cost of exceeding Title 24 by 15%. The fee will establish a dollar value per pound of
necessary carbon offset by building type. Preliminary estimates from our consultant, ConSol,
indicate that the fee may be approximately $2.50 per pound of carbon plus administrative costs.
By focusing on pounds of carbon per square foot, the City can utilize the same set of ground
, rules for residential and commercial construction, new construction and remodels, custom homes
and large developments. Builders shall also have the option of opting out of the checklist if they
demonstrate through CEC certified software that they exceed Title 24 by 15% or more.
Earlv Adoption of California Green Building Code
The Building Standards Commission (BSC) and Department of Housing and Community
Devdopment (BCD) have developed a California Green Building Code (CGBC), which will
apply to non-residential and residential construction, respectively. The BSC regulations for non-
residential buildings is currently intended to be a voluntary code, while the HCD version for
housing three stories or less will become mandatory by State Law on January 1,20 II. Since the
mix of Chula Vista permits weighs heavily on residential (80/20), it is recommended that the
California Green Building Code requirements be used for both residential and commercial
buildings.
Please note that the plumbing provisions of CGBC do not become effective until July I, 2011.
The plumbing measures have a delayed adoption to ensure that enough of the required product
(fixtures, showerheads and toilets) will be available to meet market demand when the code is
adopted. The CGBC includes many best practices among the existing green programs. The
water savings, construction waste reductions, and the Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) limits
for paints, adhesives, and carpets can be mainstreamed into construction practice with minimal
cost impact. The provision of the CGBe that has the largest cost impact is the requirement for
1.28 gallon per flush toilets. Currently, a 1.28 gallon per flush toilet is -$250 more expensive
than a current 1.6 gallon per flush toilet. '
It is recommended that Chula Vista adopt the HCD California Green Building Code as itwill be
approved this summer. If Chula Vista adopts this code before the implementation date of
January 1,2011 and/or expands its scope to include commercial buildings, the City will need to
adopt a Findings of Fact per Health and Safety Code 17958.5 and 17958.7. This is a finding that
states that the new municipal code is reasonably necessary' for climatic, geologic or topographic
conditions. The new code would not be effective until the Findings of Fact were filed along with
the ordinance to the Building Standards Commission.
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1, 2008
21 of 58
2-24
The requirements of the HCD California Green Building Code are:
Plan for storm water drainage and retention during construction;
406.2 Site Development: retention basins; storm water filtered by a barrier system to public
drainage; comoliance with storm water manacrement ordinances
503 Enerl!V Efficiencv Performance requirements meet current T -24
506.1 Air Sealing Package Joints and openings must be sealed to the CEC energy standards
currently in effect
20% reduction in potable water use; each plumbing fixture 20%
reduced flow rate: showerheads - 2.5 to 2.0 gpm, bathroom and
603 Indoor Water Use kitchen faucets - 2.2 to 1.8 gpm, toilets - 1.6 to 1.28 gal/flush.( 1.28
gpf toilets are required by code as of 711111) or calculation
demonstratine: 20% reduction in water use baseline
705.3 Covering of Ducts & From rough until final all ducts shall be covered to reduce dust and
Mechanical Equipment debris which may collect in the svstem
50% reduction of non-hazardous construction and demolition
709.2 Construction Waste Reduced waste or local ordinance, whichever is more stringent (exception:
excavated soil and land-clearing debris)
711.2 Building & Maintenance Provided to building owner
Manual
Adhesives and sealants used on the project shall meet the
requirements of the following standards: 1. Adhesives, adhesive
804.1.1 Adhesives and Sealants bonding primers, adhesive primers, sealants and sealant primers
shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) Rule #1168; and 2. Aerosol adhesives shall meet the
reouirements of California Code of Reaulations, Title 17
804.1.2 Paints & coatings Architectural paints .and coatings shall comply with South Coast
Air Ouality Manaaement District (SCAO~!D) Rule #11l3.
804.1.3 Carpet & carpet systems Shall be low VOC
804.1.4.1 Particleboard and medium Shall be certified to ANSI A208.1 and A208.2 (low formaldehyde
density fiberboard (MDF) used in emission standards)
interior finish systems
804.1.4.2 Hardboard plywood nsed in Shall be certified and comply with ANSlJPHV A HP-1-2204 and
U.S. HUD Title 24, Part 3280 (low formaldehyde emission
interior finish systems standards)
805.2.1 Vapor retarder and capillary Min. 4" of 12" clean aggregate base between vapor retarder and
break installed for slah on grade slab
foundations
Building materials with visible signs of water damage, mold or
805.3 Moisture content of building other biological growth shall not be installed; interior walls and
floors shall not be enclosed if framing members exceed 18%
materials moisture content or if insulation is wet or have a high moisture
content
Exhaust fans shall be provided from each room containing a
bathtub, shower, or tub/shower combination; exhaust fans shall
806.3 Bathroom exhanst fans comply with ASHRAE 62.2, Section 5; exhaust fans shall be
ENERGY compliant; exhaust fans shall terminate outside the
building
HV AC filters shall be rated at MER V 6 or higher. Filter grills and
806.4 Filters duct systems shall be sized to prevent pressure drop across the
filter.
-
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1; 2008
22 of J8
2-25
Unlike other green programs, however, there is no requirement in the HCD portion of the
California Green Building Code to exceed Title 24. It is the energy efficiency portion of any
green program that is responsible for the carbon dioxide savings. Thus, the HCD program on its
own will do little to combat global warming, but when paired with a City requirement to reduce
carbon, the HCD program is on par with the other green programs found nationally and
throughout the state. The HCD language is closely modeled on the soon to be published ANSI
700 National Green Building Standard. The City ofChula Vista Growth Management Ordinance
currently requires a Water Conservation Plan (WCP) to be submitted with all Sectional Planning
Area plans, tentative subdivision maps, or with major development projects. In May 2003, the
City adopted WCP guidelines in order to implement this requirement. As a companion
component to this program in the Turf Lawn Conversion program (measure #7), the City would
review the state Model Landscape Ordinance and update the Landscape Manual and WCP
guidelines to encourage additional water savings.
City staff and builders will need to be trained on the requirements of the California Green
Building Code. Since this training will ultimately be necessary, focusing on the California Code
eliminates the need to train for a local green building code now, and the California code later.
Green Awareness Program
An education and outreach effort will help to highlight energy saving steps homeowners and
building operators can take to help reduce their carbon footprint. The science and findings
behind the CCWG's measures should be made available to the public. Education and outreach
efforts should include what the CCWG recommendations say and why they should be
implemented. Distinctions should be presented between basic Energy Code compliance, the
Chula Vista Green Building Standard and the upcoming California Green Building Code.
Between these standards, a new or substantially remodeled structure will combine an energy
efficient building envelope, building systems, water conservation, increased comfort and cost
savings as well as a much healthier indoor environment and provide measure implementation
time lines and guidelines for all aspects of the outreach and education program. Information
dissemination should be through the City's Building and Planning Departments many outreach
resources such as their "Sustainability Website," newsletters, seminar series, news releases,
brochures and fact sheet stations as well as other marketing approaches and media. A carbon
calculator is another way to encourage those not building or retrofitting to start thinking about
reducing their footprint. Green Awareness will be spread through training City staff and builders
on the requirements of the California Green Building Code. All new buildings in Chula Vista
shall include a Green Awareness section in the Homeowner or Maintenance and Operations
Manual. This would contain an overview of the energy and cost saving features as well as
facto ids such as that a Plasma screen television uses as much electricity'as a refrigerator.
Policv Guidelines and Regulatorv Amendments
In order to implement the Building Carbon Reduction Benchmark Program, several policy
documents and development regulations will need to be modit1ed to reflect new green building
standards. This program will likely require amendments to the City's adopted Air Quality
Improvement Plan (AQIP) guidelines, Growth Management Ordinance, Design Manual and
Guidelines, and the City's Municipal Code. The Green Building Standards Program will also
require amendments to the Zoning Ordinance in order to implement any proposed community
and/or site and building design standards. LEED-NC (New Construction) and LEED-ND
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
Juiy 1, 2008
23 of 58
2-26
(Neighborhood Development) will continue to be considered and encouraged as the City amends
the Zoning Ordinance and Design Manuals. Although Chula Vista is creating its own Green
Building Standards program consistent with the direction of State legislation for building codes,
Chula Vista will continue to use and consider (according to General Plan policy) LEED-NC and
LEED-NO, as long as they are national standards embraced by the broader architectural and
development community. These LEED standards are now included and available through the
Urban Core Specific Plan as options and are coupled with development incentives.
All proposed regulatory amendments will be vetted through a public process that will encourage
community and stakeholder input. Following adoption of these proposed changes to the City's
policy guidelines and development regulations, staff will evaluate and implement a process to
align the Green Building Standards program and the Zoning Ordinance and Design Manual
modifications with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review
process.
PERFORMANCE METRICS
The implementation of this measure requires an addition to the City's municipal code outlining
the new green building standard. Performance would be gauged by the sum of carbon savings of
each permit granted and building built in comparison to the anticipated savings achieved through
compliance with the minimum requirements of the applicable version of Title 24.
TIMELINE
The program's implementation timeline is graphically summarized below. The CGBC is
currently in a IS-day comment period, but once it is approved, the Chula Vista City Council
could also approve the code. The implementation of the thula Vista Green Building Standards
could occur as soon as municipal codes are amended and adequate notice is given to the public.
The fact that the implementation and enforcement process for building new structures is already
in place shortens the recommendation's implementation. Findings of Fact would need to be filed
with the BSC. Authoring and creation of fliers (builder, homeowner, building operator and
carbon reduction checklist) could be done by staff or outsourced, depending on capabilities and
time. In addition, Planning and Building Department staff will need to be trained on CGBC, the
Chula Vista Carbon Reduction Checklist, 2008 Title 24 code changes and ASHRAE 62.2.
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July I, 2008 .
24 of 58
2-27
CCWG MEASURE #4: GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
Implementation Plan Timellne
PROGRAM MilESTONES
FebG9
';'.dopt Community
Sustainability llrovisions
OC!C8
. Adopt Carbon Reduction
BllnchmlOrkfE:lIl)' Green
81dg Code
MayG9
. Pre-fide ~lalf&indu5tl')'
Irainingor'lT24
July 09
.Implemenl New nUe 24
June '08
Jan '09
April 09'
. .-1.dopt ~nhanced
T24 fori,1J9 effective
date'
July '09
Sept 08
. Diitribule Green Building
Awareness.\Aaterials
Dee 08
. FHa requllst 10 adopt
Green 81ag Standard
JUnElll9
. Potential AS 32
compliance
'Undala fae schedule
to ;9118CI 3dditiona!.oC
& Insp workload
BUDGET & FINAt"lCING
Cost for carrying out the four main implementation components vary by component and are
outlined below. Final costs and budget implications will need to be determined and presented as
the various program components are finalized and returned for Council action.
Building Carbon Reduction Benchmark Program-
The Building Carbon Reduction Benchmark Program does not require additional field
inspections by Chula Vista inspectors so additional staff should not be necessary. Inspection
criteria and documentation, however, will expand requiring more time per project. Information
dissemination can occur in printed form at the permit counter, vendor and material outlets, and
professional meetings. Information can also be distributed on the City website.
Early Green Building Code Adoption-
Staff will be working with our consultant, ConSol, to identifY associated costs and will return
those to Council when available.
Green Awareness Program-
Staffing at 15% of a Building Inspector III: $22,500 annually
Outreach and awareness publications: $15,000 annually
CCWO Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
25 of 58
2-28
The City currently has a grant application in under the 2009-11 SDG&E Partnership Program
funding cycle to cover these costs, and should hear back by July 2008 if we are successful.
Policy Guidelines and Regulatory Amendments-
The Planning Division staffing cost estimate for implementation of the "Policy Guidelines and
Regulatory Amendments" is approximately $75,000. An additional $2,500 will be needed for
publications of revised documents, bringing the total one time budget cost to $77,500.
CCWG #4 - Green Building Standards - Budget
City Staff $15,000 $280,000
Consuiting Services $25,000 $20,000
Carbon Reduction Marketing $20,000 $5,000
Benchmark Program
Other Commodities $15,000 $4,000
TOTAL $75,000 $309,000
City Staff $15,000 $280,000
Early Green Buiiding Other Commodities $15,000 $5,000
Code Adoption
TOTAL $30,000 $285,000
City Staff $22,500 $22,500
Green Awareness Marketing $20,000 $15,000
Program Other Commodities $10,000 $5,000
TOTAL $52,500 I $42,500
City Staff $75,000 $10,000
Policy Guidelines &
Regulatory Other Commodities $2,500 $1,000
Amendments
TOTAL $77,500 $11,000
TOTAL $235,000
$647,500
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
26 of 58
2-29
MEASURE #5: SOLAR & ENERGY EFFICIENCY CONVERSION
OVERVIEW
The City ofChula Vista Climate Change Working Group's (CCWG) recommendation #5 urges
the City to facilitate widespread installation of solar photo voltaic (PV) systems, thermal solar
(hot water) and other non fossil fuel-based renewable energy options on commercial, residential
and municipal facilities by developing and implementing a renewable energy conversion
program. As proposed, the "Solar & Energy Efficiency Conversion" (SEEC) program is
intended to help the average residential and commercial consumer overcome institutional
barriers, upfront capital costs and time constraints to installing renewable energy, water
conservation and energy efficiency upgrades. The program provides participants a cost-
effective, less time-consuming installation and financing option for upgrading their homes and
facilities, while creating a sustainable economic stimulus and job creation program for Chula
Vista. The program's primary components include (1) IdentifYing the energy and water
upgrades that help reduce ratepayers monthly costs, (2) Executing a competitive bid process that
identifies participating contractors and establishes maximum prices and minimum warranty and
service standards, (3) aggregating participants geographically to harness their collective
purchasing authority and maximize the potential for installation efficiency and savings, (4)
Establishing voluntarv special assessment districts to provide participants with a financing option
to fund their improvements, (5) Linking local vocational job training in energy and water
conservation with focused business recruitment and (6) Updating municipal codes to encourage
renewable energy and conservation product installations and to remove institutional barriers.
The proposed program is graphically summarized below:
CCWG MEASURE #5: SOLAR & ENERGY EFFICIENCY CONVERSION
Implementation Plan Summary
Solar & Energy Efficiency Conversions (SEEC)
. Provide cost.effecti've in'St3l1ation '3nd financing opolJltUnities for resident::
and businesses imsrasted in energy efficiency 3nd solar energy retrorits while
creating an economic stimulus lor the community
. Promote the future installation at solar energy systems through revisicns to
t11e municipBI code
I
J.- J.- -c- ~ ~
Aggregation BIccJ<.s Assessment VccauonaJ Training Munlo/pal Energy &
IdentitY Energy Upgrades Districts & Job Creation Water Cedes
o Identify energy Jnd water .Particip3n~areableta . 'Nith Southv..estem College .Upd3te'SolarHotW3ter
uj:grades and porentia! energy finance SEEC retrofits Jnd loc-al high school district, Pre-PIl.lmbing" code to 'led
cost savings thrcu!1havaluntaryfee link vocational !mining with specmCitfabOlJtorfent3tlOn
assessmentv.t'iich is added !:)rogram implementation & siting
C-ompetltive Bid Process to propeltytaxrolls - Use program as leverage -Create "Solar Electric
-Initiate a bid process to qualify - Assessment lee is tax to recruit contractors, Pre-Wiring" code to
contractors deductible lor participants equipment vendors & promotefutLlreinstallation
- Ensure proper warr.mt)' & and retrolits do QQ!;tru]Qer a manufaCUJringfaciJitiesto - Update Municioal &
Coumypropertytax ChulaVista Zaning cedes to reflect
liability coverage reappraisal
- Streamline permitting and solar requirements
incer.tive application process
Aggregate Parlicipants
-Gecgraphically aggregate to
further lower c~st;
-Ensure eqllitabie apportlmities
for all iilterested consumers
.
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
27 of 58
2-30
IMPLEMENT AnON
The Department of Conservation & Environmental Services (CES) will administer the SEEC
Aggregation Blocks, Assessment Districts and Vocational Training/Job Creation components
with support from the Finance Department, Office of Budget & Analysis and Office of
Economic Development. CES will also work with Planning & Building Department to update
Title 20 Energy Conservation and Title 9.7 Water Conservation as well as related sections of the
City's Municipal Code. The implementation process for each component is outlined below:
Aggregation Blocks
The proposed program will geographically aggregate home and business owners who voluntarily
choose to retrofit their homes and businesses ,with ,energy and water efficiency upgrades and/or
install solar photovoltaic (electric) and solar hot water systems. By combining energy and water
efficiency upgrade options with solar panel installation, the consumer will be presented with
options that minimize their total project cost, maximize their monthly savings and emphasize a
balance of greenhouse gas (OHO) reductions and lifestyle choices (Appendix 0). Aggregating
block areas will also allow staff to naturally phase the program into the community on a block-
by-block basis and to adaptively manage its implementation.
CES will implement an open and competitive bid process to identifY contractors, who understand
the required local installation standards and are committed to assisting staff market the
energy/water efficiency upgrades and renewable energy systems to interested property owners.
Although the contract for installation work will be between the property owner and the City-
qualified contractor, the City will be able to add additional value to consumers by negotiating a
lower cost for equipment and installation, establishing minimum installation warranty, service
and liability standards, streamlining the contract, rebate application and permit process and
saving consumers the time associated with researching, analyzing and executing these phases of
their projects. Staff will work closely with the City Attorney's Office in establishing the
specialized contractor bid process or similar approach and staff anticipates that participating
contractors will be qualified through a 3rd party program such as the California Center for
Sustainable Energy, California Energy Commission, US Department of Energy and US
Environmental Protection Agency.
Initially, participating contractors would be assigned to a limited geographic area. Contractors,
who demonstrate high levels of service quality, customer outreach and' warranty support and
successfully meet the performance standards outlined in the competitive bid process, will be
permitted to expand into other geographic areas. Staff hopes to ensure that all geographic and
socio-economic sectors of the City receive equitable access to the program. The City will also
use aggregation to provide an incentive to ensure that equipment, materials and supplies are
purchased from a Chula Vista business that provides comprehensive warranty and service for
their supplies and equipment. Additionally, the City will use the competitive bid process to help
connect employers with the local vocational education program to foster growth in a new sector
of "clean technology" jobs and further reduce the program's carbon footprint by facilitating the
use of local labor.
Assessment Districts
The City will offer participating property owners the option of financing the energy and water
efficiency and renewable energy upgrades through a voluntary fee assessment. Participating
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1. 2008
28 of 58
2-31
property owners would add the costs of investing in energy and water improvements to their
property's tax roll (see Budget & Financing section for discussion of general bond issuance).
These costs will be paid back over time through semi-annual tax payments and can be structured
to be offset by the energy 'and water savings generated by the improvements chosen by the
participant. This process is designed to overcome the barrier of upfront costs for installing
renewable energy technologies which many industry experts and regulators have identified as a
significant barrier to broad renewable energy adoption. Participants would also have the option
of participating in the aggtegation process and funding the improvements on their own.
According to the County Tax Assessor, the energy and water efficiency upgrades and renewable
energy installations proposed by the progtam will not trigger a property tax re-appraisal.
Vocational Training & Job Creation
In coordination with Southwestern College and the local high school district, staff will link
vocational training opportunities with the program's implementation. Specifically, contractors
qualified by the City to perform energy efficient upgrades and solar energy installations (as part
of the SEEC Aggregation Blocks) will be encouraged to hire new employees from the vocational
education program as the program matures and produces qualified graduates. Staff will work
with the vocational education progtam, local contractors and local suppliers to establish
incentives in the bid and marketing assignment process to establish incentives for local hiring.
Staff will use the SEEC program as an economic stimulus and business recruitment tool for
Chula Vista. As previously mentioned, contractors qualified by the City to perform installations
will be required to purchase related program materials and equipment through a Chula Vista-
licensed business. Staff will use the SEEC progtam as leverage to recruit solar and energy
efficient equipment installers, distributors and manufacturers to establish a "clean technology"
business division within Chula Vista. In addition to generating employment opportunities and
sales tax revenues, the new business's proximity could lo\ver overall equipment, installation and
transportation costs and GHG impacts for SEEC program participants. Once the size of the
Chula Vista and regional market potential is established, staff will re-contact renewable energy
and water energy product manufacturers and suppliers about establishing manufacturing and
assembly plants within the Chula Vista and south San Diego County area.
Municioal Energv and Water Conservation Codes
Chula Vista's Municipal Code (20.04.030) requires that "all new residential units shall include
plumbing specifically designed to allow the later installation of a system which utilizes solar
energy as the primary means of heating domestic potable water" (Appendix H). To maximize
the effectiveness of the "Solar Hot Water Pre-plumbing Standard," staff will update the code to
include additional language about site orientation and solar access. Staff may also need to make
revisions to the City's Zoning Ordinance, accordingly. To expand opportunities for the cost-
effective installation of solar energy systems in the future, City staff will also develop an
amendment to the Municipal Code's Title 20 "Energy Conservation" section in order to require
pre-wiring for solar photovoltaic systems in new and remodeled residential units. The code
amendment will include specific guidance about site orientation and solar access. In addition,
the code will complement sections of the Municipal Building and Zoning Code being updated as
part of CCWG Measure #4 (Green Building Standard) which will likely address passive solar
building design, new solar photovoltaic installation, energy efficiency and gteen building
standards being promulgated by state and local agencies.
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
29 of 58
2-32
PERFORc'\1ANCE METRICS
The results of this program will be tracked on a project-by-project basis and summarized to
identitY its "net" impact on the City's GHG emissions reduction goal. Specifically, the Solar &
Energy Efficiency Conversion program's performance will be measured by a suite of metrics
including the number of energy efficiency improvements, participating homeslbusinesses, solar
systems installed, renewable generation kilowatts installed and the corresponding kWhlTherm
savings. Staff will also work with San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) and the California
Center for Sustainable Energy t.o quantitY the number and amount of incentive funds solicited as
a result of the program.
In the current greenhouse gas inventory protocol, the community's carbon emissions are directly
extrapolated from citywide energy use, which is provided in an aggregated format by SDG&E.
Because the SEEC program will improve energy efficiency and/or replace grid-source energy
with on-site renewable energy, it wiII lead to overall energy use reductions in existing individual
homes and businesses that participate in the program. Because the program is voluntary and
incentive driven, its final impact on citywide "net" GHG emission reductions will depend on the
level of community participation and the effectiveness of other CCWG Measures (such as the
Green Building Standard) to ensure that future growth is carbon neutral.
TIMELINE
Prior to enrolling interested property owners into the program, components #1 (Aggregation
Blocks) and #2 (Assessment Districts) would first require establishment of financing
mechanisms and a contractor bid process which is estimated to occur in summer 2009.
Component #3 (Vocational Training) would be integrated as the program is launched and
implemented. Local educators have estimated that it would take 2-3 years to establish a
curriculum and matriculate the first class of qualified energy efficiency/solar apprentices.
Finally, refining the current solar hot water standard and c'reating a solar electric pre-wiring code
(component #4) would take approximately 3-6 months and would require the necessary public
notice periods and public readings before Council action. The program's time line is below:
CCWG MEASURE #i;: SOLAR & ENERGY EFFICIENCY CONVERSION
Implementation Plan Timellne
PROGRAM MILESTONES
.lm
Wm
'"
. Develop gUides ror
Solar PV ,ore-wiring
Sept 'DB July'09 Oct '09
'Oraft,~presentto . Secure bend andior . Establi$h special
C.JUI',ciISOlarcwde local lee Jut/'lOrityfar
reY1stcns nnanClng asseszmentdistricts
. . I I .
1.08 I I T I
June '09 June
June '08 Aug'09 Sept '09
olement Solar Hot .Irutiatecontrdctor 'Hlre8.tralnsctf
arprs-plumbing bid process: . Develop ~rogram
1.:Jrement materials
'10
JUT
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July I, 2008
300f58
2-33
BUDGET & FlNAc'\[CING
The SEEC program's implementation cost (exclusive of energy efficiency and solar energy
equipment and installation) is estimated to be $347,800 per year in staffing, supplies and
services. An additional $75,000 may also be needed initially to provide resources to update and
create the aforementioned energy-related municipal codes. This program cost assumes full
funding of all seven CCWG measures and will leverage each measure's budget to provide partial
cost sharing of staff time and program materials. For example, staff enrolling homes and
businesses in the Solar & Energy Efficiency Conversion program will also promote the Turf
Lawn Conversion (CCWG Measure #7) program to property owners leading to lower
implementation costs for each program and increased program participation. A portion of each
measure's budget will also partially cover overall administrative and performance tracking costs
associated with the City's climate protection efforts. The program's budget is outlined below:
CCWG #5 - Solar & Energy Efficiency Conversion Program - Budget
City Staff
$219,000
SEEC Aggregation
Blocks, Assessment
Districts & Vocational
Training'
Interns
$49,000
Marketing
$50,000
Other Commodities"
$29,800
TOTAL
$347,800
City Staff $70,000 ----.
Municipal Energy Codes Other Commodities $5,000 ----
TOTAL $75,000 ----
TOTAL
$75,000
$347,800
*Assumes cost sharing between CCWG Measures #3, 5 & 7 for staff time & program materials
**Budget does not include capital costs for solar & energy efficiency improvements (dependent on
participation levels)
To fund the program, staff is recommending that a combination of bond and local "fee authority"
funding be pursued. The bond would be used to cover the initial capital costs associated with
energy efficiency and solar retrofits for public/private facilities and will allow this measure to
establish an economy of scale that can maximize the benefits of aggregated and competitive
purchasing to reduce consumer and City costs. A fee authority would provide long-term,
sustainable funding for the program to supplement the initial bond authority and provide a
complementary revenue source to fund a portion of the costs for transitioning to on-site
renewable energy at City facilities. Both funding mechanisms will also be complemented by
local, state and federal rebates, tax incentives and credits. In addition, carbon emissions
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
31 of 58
2-34
mitigation or offset fees being developed through CCWG Measure #4 (Green Building Standard)
could be applied to the SEEC program to subsidize energy efficiency and renewable energy
upgrades at municipal facilities or within existing building stock preferably targeting lower
income families and service institutions (such as low income housing, shelters etc.)
CCWO Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1, 2008
32 of 58
2-35
MEASURE #6: SMART GROWTH AROUND TROLLEY ST A nONS
OVERVIEW
The City of Chula Vista Climate Change Working Group's (CCWG) recommendation #6 states
that the City should "facilitate 'smart growth' around the H St., E St. and Palomar St. troney
stations." This recommendation embodies the fact that smart growth lS typified by a compact,
efficient and environmentany sensitive pattern of development that provides housing,
employment; service uses and public facilities in a mixed-use format close to transit and other
modes of alternate transportation. This improves and promotes the ability to conveniently access
uses by walking and/or transit, thereby reducing automobile use and the associated burning of
fossil fuels that contribute to greenhouse gas production. Transportation emissions represent
approximately 48% of the Chula Vista community's carbon footprint, whereby reduction in
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) through promoting pedestrian and transit friendly smart growth
environments, can have a meaningful effect on carbon emissions. .
The staff agenda report which accompanied the Climate Change Working Group's
recommendations also noted that Recommendation #6 would not require much further
implementation action because mixed-use, transit-oriented land use designations, policy and
zoning has already been incorporated into City planning documents for the subject areas; namely
the updated General Plan (GP) and the Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP). While those plans
have been adopted, there are several work efforts necessary in order to move from those plans to
facilitate the envisioned smart growth development with the E, H and Palomar St. Transit Focus
Areas (TFAs). The four areas of work presented in this implementation plan include (1)
implementation of the UCSP through preparation of a framework plan for redevelopment of the
area around the E St. station, (2) completion of the H St. Corridor Study caned for in the General
Plan to address more detailed land use and transportation, planning provisions along H St. from
the trolley station east to Third Ave., (3) preparation ofSp'ecific Plans within the Southwest area,
and (4) other related regional efforts to prepare design studies for needed improvements along
the 1-5 corridor to serve the sites.
As described further in this document, some aspects of these four efforts are included in the
current Work Programs cif the involved Departments, while others will require further work
program and budget authorizations by Council.
IMPLEMENTATION
The Planning and Building Department win primarily administer the City's Smart Growth
planning and zoning efforts outlined below but will need to work, and is already working, in
partnership with the City's Redevelopment Agency and Housing Authority, Engineering
Department and others to develop and implement related plans, programs and projects. The
implementation process for each component is outlined below: -
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July I, 2008
33 of 58
2-36
CC1I'JG MEASURE #6: SMART GROWTH AT TROLLEY STATIONS
Implementation Plan Summary
Urban Core Specific
Plan Implementation
-Prepare lrameW01k
developmerrt: plan tor SlJper.
block ar~s around E st. trolley
:tation.
""06Iaxy~ project proposal
under review for portton ot Clty
corporation Yl!lrd site :roJth ot
the ESt.station.
-Example 2.0 viw51lzation
3cerwio under SANDAO
gr~nt.
Updated City General Plan (Dec. 2005)
. Promotes Smart GrO'Mh snd Transit Ot1l'!nted Development around
existing and future TroUey1SRTstatloos, ~nd establlshes high dem:ity
:OM mixed-w:e Isnd use de$ignalkms and.suppl:lrtlve poticie:s.
H Straet Conidor
Study
'Fl.lnd and cood\.;ct Urban
Land lnstitute(ULI)
colltlborative design ctmret!:e.
-Prepare !Jmendmerts to the
General Plan <Hid/or UCSP
lorconsideratioo ba~ed on
the charrl?tte outcomes.
-Complete e;(a~ie 3-D
\lisu:!Il::3l:ion scenario under
$.A.NDAOgrant.
Soutl'lwest Specific
Plan(S)
. CDmplete firS'! phase of
Southwest United in Action
programcurrertlyundeflNtry.
-Prepare W(lI'k program and
bUdget for Council
consideration to uneertGl< e a
Sp~iflc Plsn tor the Palomar
Oalewa>f TFAtc implement
the GPU.
Otl'ler Related
Reg/ona/E.fforts
. Identity and aJIocate CIt'1'
match funding to comll'le1'lce l-
S Cornde:' study wllh SA~(l,4,G
andCaftrans.
"WOrk with SANOAGIMTS to
refine, design. fully fl.lr.d and
~edule trolley grade
separntlon projects fer both E
St. end HSL
I. Urban Core Soecific Plan Implementation
E Street Transit Focus Area / Galaxy ENA - The adopted General Plan identifies the area
surrounding the E St. trolley station as the E St. Transit Focus Area and calls for high
intensity mixed use development within the superblo"k between 1-5, F St., Woodlawn Ave.
and E St. The area was subsequently zoned as part of the UCSP's UC-15 District. While
much of the land area is owned by the City and NITS as part of the City's old corporation
yard and trolley station site respectively, there are several other privately held parcels.
Successful redevelopment as a high intensity TF A will require joint coordination and
planning for matters such as infrastructure, circulation, site design, building massing, and
parking.
The Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation is currently under a 120-day Exclusive
Negotiating Agreement with Galaxy Commercial Holding, LLC to explore a transit-oriented
development project on the City's former corporation yard ("Corp Yard") located
immediately adjacent to the E Street Trolley Station. A premise of the ENA and
development of the Corp Yard site is that they will create momentum and market confidence
for private investment in the rest of the E Street Visitor Transit Focus Area ("TF A"). The
ENA requires a Comprehensive Site Design Study to consider such factors as the City's
adopted land use plans and policies, adjacent land ownerships and property interests in the
subdistrict, parcel configurations, circulation and traffic patterns, environmental factors,
plans for regional transportation facilities, Bayfront planning and redevelopment activities,
and public input. The Study will also include proposed Floor Area Ratio ("FAR")
distributions, phasing strategies and pedestrian and vehicular circulation patterns on the
Property and surrounding properties within the UC-15 Subdistrict, along with site plans
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
34 of 58
2-37
depicting Developer's proposed development scenarios. Staff is currently working with
Galaxy on the Study and their project development proposals which are due between now
and mid-July 2008 when the current ENA period expires. Based on progress of the work, the
Agency will then need to consider whether to extend the ENA:
2-D Visual Simulations of E Street TFA - As part .of SANDAG's Smart Growth
Implementation program, the City has recently received grants for the preparation of
computer visual simulation models for both the E Street TF A and the H Street Corridor.
Under the grants, SANDAG's consultant Urban Advantage will prepare a computer
generated visual simulation of urban redevelopment of the E St. TF A. From a chosen
vantage point at E St and Woodlawn Ave., the computer simulation will depict photo-
realistic phased development intensification of the area consistent with the GP and UCSP
visions. The simulation will assist staff in working with the public and decision makers to
better envision and understand how urban redevelopment of the site may look, particularly
from the standpoint of building massing and building heights.
Initial work by the consultant Urban Advantage has been completed, and staff is currently
reviewing a draft of the modeling work. A final product will be available by July 2008.
2. H Street Corridor Studv
Urban Land Institute Program - The December 2005 General Plan designates the H St.
corridor between the H St. trolley station and Third Ave. as a Study Area. H St. serves asthe
major commercial and office corridor connecting the Bayfront and the H Street TF A with the
downtown Third A venue area. Considering the large property ownerships and potential for
expansions and redevelopment involving the South County Court House, Scripps Hospital,
Chula Vista Center, and a new hoteVconvention center on the Bay Front, H Street provides
great opportunity for revitalization. While the General Plan and UCSP provided a
framework, they did not provide a cohesive road map to physically and economically
proceed with actual redevelopment including land assembly, parcel configuration,
environmental factors, floor area ratio (FAR) distributions, circulation and traffic patterns,
and plans for regional transportation facilities.
In order to move development efforts forward, the Redevelopment Agency is currently
pursuing sponsorship of an Urban Land Institute's (ULI) panel that will bring planning and
real estate experts to Chula Vista to conduct a five-day Advisory Services Program. The
Program will use a public charrette-type process to identifY and address relevant
issues/challenges, and provide an implementation strategy for the revitalization of the
Corridor. From staffs perspective, the process will playa key role in working to bring the
community together on a workable vision for pursuing projects within the Corridor. Staff
will be coming forward to the Agency on July 22, 2008 to appropriate $120,000 to fund the
ULI program. If approved, the ULI program is currently anticipated to take place the week
of October 12 - 17, 2008.
Potential General Plan and/or UCSP amendments - Dependent upon the outcomes of the
ULI program, it may be necessary to undertake revisions to the General Plan and/or UCSP to
effect land use and regulatory changes to support desired redevelopment. Following the
October session, staff would need approximately 45 days to develop a work program for any
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July I. 2008
350f58
2-38
potential GP and/or UCSP amendments, and could return to Council in January 2009 to
present that. Dependent upon the nature and extent of the potential amendments, it could
take 6 to 9 months or more to complete them, with staff returning for Planning Commission
and Council public hearing consideration of amendments beginning no sooner than Fall
2009.
3-D Visual Simulations of H Street Corridor - As noted above, the City also received a
SANDAG grant for consultant Urban Advantage to prepare a photo-realistic visual
simulation of a redeveloped H Street corridor. Staff currently intends to tie the visualization
work to completion of the ULI effort, whereby the SANDAG modeling efforts would
incorporate land use and building form outputs from the ULI charretle, and provide 3-D
visual imaging of the potential redevelopment of the Corridor to enhance public
understanding and build support for subsequent planning and project work. Staff has already
begun work with SANDAG's consultant with regard to their scanning and input of base
information of existing conditions. Completion of the modeling would take place during
November and December 2008.
3. Preparation of Southwest Specific Planes)
With regard to the Palomar Gateway TF A, the General Plan calls for the preparation of a
Specific Plan or other comprehensive zoning and design tool to carry out urban revitalization
and redevelopment within the TF A which includes the Palomar' trolley station and
surrounding areas. The General Plan also identified the need for Specific Plans in several
additional locations within the Southwest Planning Area. While current Planning and
Building Department work programs generally identify the need for these Plans, there is not
available staffing, consulting and budget resources available to prepare them. The shaping of
those work programs and budgets will also depenc;l on whether one overall Southwest
Specific Plan is undertaken, or as staff currently envisions, the preparation of individual,
smaller Specific Plans focused on particular areas such as the Palomar TF A.
Southwest United in Action program priority setting - Prior to proceeding with further
detail work program and budget planning for Specific Plans, staff is currently engaged in
completing the first phases of the Southwest United in Action (SUA) program to gauge the
range of community issues, and related community priorities. Initial community inputs on
issues were solicited at a Community Convention on March 15, 2008, and staff will be
holding a second Community Convention on June 21,2008, to solicit input on action items
that are most important to the community, including preparation of Specific Plans. Stiff will
subsequently return to Council by fall 2008 to present community priority inputs.
Palomar Gateway TF A Specific Plan - Should the community identify a priority for
preparation of this Specific Plan through the above SUA work, and upon subsequent
direction from the City Council, staff will prepare a work program and budget for a Palomar
Gateway TF A Specific Plan for review and consideration by Council. Some work towards a
Specific Plan for this area (entitled the Palomar Gateway Conceptual Design Study) was
prepared during the General Plan Update, and could be used to jump start the effort. If Plan
preparation is identified as a community priority, and supported by Council, it would take
approximately 60 days for staff to return with a work program and budget proposal.
Assuming Council considers and provides direction on community priorities by the end of
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
36 of 58
2-39
2008, staff could return the work program for consideration by March 2009 as part of the
FY09-10 budget proposals. If approved, preparation of a Specific Plan would take
approximately 12-18 months and could commence after July 2009.
4. Other Related Regional Efforts
There are also two major regional efforts that must be undertaken and completed in order to
ultimately develop and build out the smart growth land use plans and intensities for the
trolley station areas, particularly those at E St. and H St. These include undertaking the 1-5
Corridor Study with SAt'lDA0, and securing a funding program for the grade separation of
the trolley crossings at E and H Streets.
1-5 Corridor Study - This Corridor Study is a needed prerequisite in the planning and design
of future transportation improvements along the 1-5 corridor necessary to ultimately serve
development in western Chula Vista and the Bayfront. The improvements would encompass
highway travel lanes, HOV and transit, as well as reconfiguration of ramping, the bridge
decks, and grade separation of the trolley crossing at E and H Streets. Considerations for one
component affect the rest, and the Corridor Study serves as a mechanism to review and
address the interrelationships prior to proceeding with the next phases of design.
Staff began meeting almost two years ago with SANDAG regarding the scoping, cost and
timing for the work, and has since developed a work program and budget with SANDAG and
Caltrans. The Study has a matching component for Chula Vista. Staff has been working
with Congressman Filner's office over the last year to see through legislation that was
approved on June 6, 2008, that redesignated approximately $2 million in federal SAI'ETEA-
LU funds to cover our matching component. SANDAG, Caltrans and City staff will now be
refining the scope of work. The Corridor Study project was defined as a project in the
Western CV TOlI' program approved by Council in March 2008. The 24-month Study will
commence in FY08-09, with completion anticipated by I'Y 2010-11.
Trolley Grade Separation funding - Grade separation of the trolley crossings at both E St.
and H St. will be needed to accommodate urban development intensification in western
Chula Vista by allowing traffic to access and cross 1-5 absent the current impediment of the
trolley gates. This also affects the design for redevelopment at both of these IF As. Costs for
the separations are estimated at $36 million for H St. and $40 million for E St. SANDAG
has identified funding for approximately 50% of the costs, while 28% of the costs are
identified as ultimately being funded through the WCV TDIF approved by Council in March
2008. Staff is currently working with SANDAG to make grant applications to the State for
additional funding, and requires a letter of approval from the Mayor to make the application
that is due by June 19, 2008. Notification of any grant awards is anticipated in Sept./Oct.
2008, and staff will report back to Council at that time. In the event that sufficient grant
monies are not received, staff will need to work with the Council to identify and pursue other
sources.
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
37 of 58
2-40
PERFORi\1At"CE METRICS
Given that the items under this Implementation Measure involve proposed planning and project
efforts, the performance metrics would be completion of each of the above identified planning
and study components.
TIMELlNE
Following is an overview of milestones associated with each implementation component
pursuant to the prior discussions and reflected in the accompanying time line graphic:
CCWG MEASURE # 6: SMART GROWTH AROUND TROLLEY STATIONS
Implementation Plan Tlmeline
July 06
. Complete E St. TFA PROGRAM MILESTONES
Comprehensive Design
Study Nov/Oec 06
. Ccmplere initial Galaxy I Oet08 I
site plan for old Corp. . Conduct UL! H St. Study -3-iJ visualization forH
Yard site StreetCorTidar
. Consider whether to OetOS
.Mend Galaxy EN.~
. Grade separation
grantnotific-;:;tion
. . I j. I I
r I , i T T I I I
July 'O~ Sept OS Jan '09 u!y'
. Start'24-month 1.5
CorridarStlJdy FY09.10
Ju>;oe Dee 08 . Prepare PalomarTFA
Specific Plan
. ,~eque$t to .dgency to . Council action on SVVUA
fund H St. ULI StlJdy priorities
09
.JuIy08
. E St 2-0 visual simulation
from SMJOAG
MarOG
. Warn Drogram & budget
f,)r PaJom3r Gateway SP
Implementation comoonent #1 - the E St. TFA Framework Plan is due to the City from
Galaxy by mid-July 2008 per the current ENA. This includes their development of an initial
site plan for development of the City's prior corporation yard site. Ifmore time is needed or
desired, the Agency would need to extend the ENA. The 2-D visual simulation work with
SANDAG will be completed by July 2008.
Implementation component #2 - The request for Agency funding of the ULI Study will be
brought forward on July 22, 2008. If approved, the ULI activities would be conducted during
the week of October 12- I 7, 2008. Based on outcomes of the ULI efforts, any desired
General Plan and/or UCSP amendments would take a minimum of approximately 6 to 9
months to complete, with the earliest hearings starting in fall 2009. Per agreements with
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
38 of 58
2-41
SAt'\!DAG, the 3-D visual simulations would follow the ULI work, and be completed by
December 2008.
Implementation component #3 - If identified as a community priority through the SUA work
by August 2008, the earliest a work program and budget for a Palomar Gateway Specific
Plan could be returned for Council consideration would be November 2008. If authorized,
preparation of the Specific Plan would take 12 to 18 months. Assuming a January 2009 start,
the earliest time for completion would be spring 2010.
Implementation component #4 - Work program and funding clarifications with SANDAG for
the 1-5 Corridor Study are anticipated over the next 2 months, with the Study getting
underway in FY2008-09. The 24-month Study would be anticipated for completion some
time in FY20 I 0-11. State grant applications for trolley grade separation funding are due
June 19. Notification on grant awards is currently scheduled for Sept./Oct. 2008.
BUDGET
Costs associated with carrying out implementation are comprised of several components, some
of which are funded and budgeted, and others which will require future budget and funding
considerations as follows:
Implementation component #1
Galaxy Framework Plan and Corp Yard Site Plan; privately funded.
2-D Visual Simulation; SANDAG consultant services (grant)
Implementation component #2
ULI Program; $120,000 funding to be requested from Redevelopment Agency.
Potential General Plan or USCP amendments; costs unknown pending outcome of ULI
program. Partial Redevelopment Funding possible, otherwise will be General Fund
request.
3-D Visual Simulation; SANDAG consultant services (grant)
Implementation component #3
Southwest United in Action program; approved Redevelopment Agency funding.
Palomar Gateway Specific Plan; estimated $250,000 for planning, $250,000 for EIR to be
sought at a future date when work program and budget presented. Partial Redevelopment
Agency funding possible, otherwise will be General Fund request. State law allows for
reimbursement district to be formed encompassing parcels within the Specific Plan.
Some grant funds may be possible, but have not yet been identified.
Implementation component #4
1-5 Corridor Study; $1.987 million in federal funding approved June 6, 2008. Balance of
costs by SANDAG.
Trolley grade separations; City WCV TDIF to pay 28% of costs currently estimated at
$18.344 million for both E and H St. Should cost estimates rise, adjustments to the
WCV TDIF would be necessary. SANDAG to pay 50% of project costs. Balance of
funds currently being sought via State grants.
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
39 of 58
2-42
CCWG #6 - Smart Growth Around Trolley Stations. Budget'
UCSP
Implementation
E Street
TOTAL
ULI Program $120,000 -----
H Street Corridor GP/UCSP Amendments ---- ----
Study Simuiation
-- ---
TOTAL $120,000 ----.
Palomar Gateway SP $250,000 ----.
Southwest Specific EIR $250,000
Plans ---
TOTAL $500,000 -
1-5 Corridor Study ---. ----
Other Related Trolley Grade Separations
Regional Efforts" ----- .----
TOTAL ------ -----
TOTAL
$620,000
. These projects' costs are necessary to implement the Council-approved General
Plan & Urban Core Specific Plan and would be incurred whether or not the CCWG
Implementation Plans are approved
.. The City has already secured approximately $20.3 million for related regional
smart growth efforts such as the 1-5 Corridor Study and the Trolley Grade
Separations (E St. & H St.)
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
2-43
40 of 58
MEASURE #7: TURF LAWN CONVERSION
OVERVIEW
The City ofChula Vista Climate Change Working Group's (CCWG) recommendation #7 states
that the City should "coordinate with Otay Water District, San Diego County Water Authority
and the Sweetwater Authority on turf lawn conversions for commercial and residential
properties." The measure was intended to help residents and businesses replace turf lawn areas
with drought-tolerant plants (commonly referred to as "xeriscape" or "California-Friendly"
landscaping). Pumping and treating water throughout California requires' large amounts of
energy and subsequently is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. The proposed
outdoor water conservation program complements the local water districts' efforts and builds
upon the City's existing NatureScape program. Specifically, the program's components include
(I) continuation and expansion of the NatureScape program to promote water conserving and
nature-friendly landscaping, (2) coupling of residential and business turf lawn replacement with
the solar conversion aggregation block process (Measure #5), (3) converting select municipal
facilities to low water use plantings and irrigation, and (4) updating various municipal landscape
regulations and guidelines to comply with new state requirements and further promote outdoor
water use efficiency. Components #1 and #2 would be voluntary and would be available to all
Chula Vista residents and businesses, while Component #3 would apply only to City properties
and rights-of-way. Component #4 would apply to new developments through updated municipal
regulations. The proposed outdoor water conservation program is graphically summarized
below:
NatureScape
. On-site assessment by City
Sbff ;Jt no cost to evaluate
whether landSCJping meet'S
"Backyard \Nildliie Habiut" and
water CDn:::elY.3tcn cr:tena
'~dIJcationabourad.ditianal
water."'avlng opportUnities and
applicable incenti....es
-Certified sites are provided a
National Wildlife Federation
yard sign and ce!'!Jfir.::ne
-Demonstration sites created
throughout community
CCWG MEASURE #7: TURF LAWN CONVERSION
Implementation Plan SUf)lmary
Outdoor Water Conservation Program
. Promotes the .=placement of turf lawn areas ""ith water.saving plants
and irrigation sy'sIems
Residential & Business
Turf conversion
Municipal Facilities
Turf Conversion
. AggregJte llameSJnd
businesses Interested in
replacing water-thirsty turf lawn
areas (in conjunction wiltl Salar
Conversion Fro~r3m - CONG
M.:!asure #5)
,Cil'/initiatesa contractor bid
process to ins~1I water~wise
plants '3nd irrigation systems far
.:!ggregatedprcperties
'PJrtlClpantscosts redl..Ced
through aggregation and City
em:uresproperwarrontyand
purchase of plants and
equipment locally
. PJrticipants also. h<lVe option
afretra1ittingirrteriorfaucets and
toilets at reduced prices
'Conv~rttllrfla\l';'!1 areas at
."electmunicipalsitestn
water-wise plants and
irrigation systems
. Pctemial sites incluce
municipal parks, medians and
puclicnghts-of-way
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July I, 2008
2-44
Landscape
Regulations Update &
Outreach
.ReviewandevaluaDan.:lf
new OWR Madej La ndsc~pe
Ordinance
. Update Municipal Landscape
Manual & Water Conservation
Plan Guidelines accordingly for
Coundn=view-
. Educ:;te residents,
businesses, contra::tors,
developers and HOAs about
new landscape regul<Jtions and
AB188't
. Promotion of N3tureScape
and Turf ConversJcn
Aggregation31ocksprognms
to HOA'S and their residents
41 of 58
IMPLEMENT A TION
The Department of Conservation & Environmental Services will administer the NatureScape and
Residential & Business Turf Conversion components, while the Planning & Building
Department and Engineering Department will coordinate the update of the City's landscape
regulations. In addition, the Engineering Department will coordinate the Municipal Facilities
Turf Conversion. All departments will work closely together to implement outreach and
marketing efforts to maximize the program's cost effectiveness. The implementation process for
each component is outlined below:
N atureScape Certified Properties
The current NatureScape program works to promote nature-friendly gardening and
landscaping throughout the community by educating property owners and "certifying"
their properties. Specifically, residents and businesses that voluntarily elect to participate
in the program receive, at no cost, an on-site assessment by a City staff member who
reviews their landscaping for the presence of food, water and cover for wildlife and the
incorporation of water-conserving features such as low water-use plants, mulching and
water efficient irrigation. Staff also educates participants about possible water-saving
improvements and available incentives and rebates, if applicable. Residential or business
properties who successfully meet the program's criteria are certified through the National
Wildlife Federation's "Backyard Wildlife Habitat" program and receive an aluminum
yard sign and certificate. The current program was developed and is being implemented
with the support ofOtay Water District, Sweerwater Authority, Chula Vista Garden Club,
Bonita Valley Garden Club, UC Master Gardeners and the South Bay Y1v!CA Earth
Service Corps.
As part of CCWG Recommendation #7's implementation, the current NatureScape
program would be continued and expanded through additional staff and program funding
for supplies and services. The new program would reach a broader audience through
comprehensive marketing efforts and produce greater water savings (and related energy
savings) through increased staff technical support and program participation. The
program will also engage the community through creation of water-saving garden and
landscape demonstration sites at various community locations. The program would
continue to collaborate closely with the local water districts to leverage resources and to
increase the program's cost effectiveness adding value for participants. The program's
goal is to be the community with the highest number of certified properties in the United
States.
Residential & Business Turf Conversions
Similar to the Solar & Energy Efficiency Conversion program (Measure #5), the
proposed program will aggregate existing homes and businesses who are interested in
replacing portions of their turf lawn areas with water-saving plant palettes and irrigation
systems. Through a competitive bid or negotiation process, a single or multiple
contractors will assist City staff in enrolling interested property owners and installing
more water-efficient landscaping. By aggregating the participants, the City will be able.
to negotiate a lower cost (on a per square footage basis) for program participants. Staff
will also be able to help reduce participants' costs by streamlining the application process
for applicable incentives offered through Otay Water District, Sweerwater Authority, San
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
42 of 58
2-45
Diego County Water Authority and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California.
The aggregated bid process will allow the City to ensure that the contractor is using
appropriate plant material and irrigation equipment purchased from a business located
within Chula Vista, providing a comprehensive warranty for their supplies and services
and following proper municipal landscape plan approval procedures. To further
maximize water use efficiency, participating businesses and homeowners may also elect
to have the contractor replace old interior water fixtures and toilets with new water-
saving models (see Measure #5). This approach satisfies real estate and developer
representatives' request to not use change of property ownership to trigger mandatory
retrofits of indoor plumbing fixtures.
Municipal Facilities Turf Conversions
The proposed program aims to replace turf lawn areas at select municipal sites with
water-saving plants and irrigation systems. In addition to reducing the City's water costs,
the re-Iandscaped areas will further provide a public demonstration of water-conserving
landscape design principles and may reduce landscape maintenance costs. Selected
municipal sites would be limited to turf lawn areas which are not actively used by the
public for recreation and would potentially include certain municipal buildings, park
areas, medians and public rights-of-way.
Landscape Regulations Update & Outreach
By January 1, 2009 the Department of Water Resources (DWR) will be releasing an
updated Model Landscape Ordinance, which outlines statewide water-conserving
landscape design criteria. Local governments will be required to adopt the model
ordinance or develop a new ordinance that is at least as effective as the statewide model
ordinance by January 1,2010. The ordinance would generally apply to landscaping for
all new developments over 2,500 ft2 in area and to re-Iandscaping of some existing
properties (certain property types are exempt), and would base design thresholds on a
maximum water allowance.
Outdoor water use throughout Chula Vista is mainly regulated through the City's
Landscape Manual which outlines landscaping and irrigation requirements for all public
projects and certain private projects and the Water Conservation Plan Guidelines which
outlines water-conserving measures that need to be integrated into Sectional Planning
Area (SPA) Plans, Tentative Subdivision Maps and major development projects with at
least 50 dwelling units or equivalent water demand. The proposed program would
provide funding for City staff to update these existing municipal regulations to meet and
potentially exceed the new statewide Model Landscape Ordinance. The updated
regulations would strongly emphasize additional outdoor water savings by further
minimizing turf lawn areas, using water-wise plant types and installing weather-based
and low-water irrigation systems.
The program component ;vill also involve actively educating Chula Vista residents,
businesses and developers of the new landscape regulations. Outreach efforts will also
help disseminate information about California Assembly Bill (AB) 1881 which made it
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July t, 2008
43 of 58
2-46
unlawful for homeowner associations that run common interest developments to restrict
the use of low water-using plants through covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs)
if the plants meet maintenance standards. Although the new law has been enacted,
residents continue to face challenges in obtaining approval from HOAs for the
installation of low water-use plant palettes and many HOAs remain unaware of the new
legislation. Associations will be informed about AB 1881 and will also be encouraged to
participate in and promote the City's water-saving programs to their residents.
PERFORMANCE METRICS
The program performance for all four components - NatureScape, Residential & Business Turf
Conversion, Municipal Facilities Turf Conversion and Landscape Regulations Update - will be
measured by a suite of metrics. The NatureScape and Residential & Business Turf Conversion
components will be assessed based on the number of participants, square footage of landscaping
certified/converted and the resulting estimated water savings. The Municipal Turf Conversion
component will also be evaluated based on the square footage of landscaping converted and the
estimated water savings. Actual water savings from program implementation may also be
quantifiable through the assistance of the local water districts. The Landscape Regulations
Update will be evaluated based on its incorporation of new water-conserving landscape design
elements that comply with new state regulations, if approved and implemented by City Council.
In relation to the City's current greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory protocol, emissions from water
use (i.e. energy used to import, treat and dispose of water) are not directly quantified, rather the
protocol only includes emissions from energy associated with locally pumping and treating water
within municipal boundaries. However, City staff will be able to estimate the program's carbon
reductions based on the California Energy Commission's kWh per gallon conversion factor
currently in development. Likewise, staff is now worki.ng with the California Air Resources
Board, ICLEI and the California Climate Action Registry to develop new local government GHG
emissions protocols which would integrate water use into emissions estimates.
TIMELINE
Component #1 (NatureScape), #2 (Residential & Business Turf Conversion) and #3's (Municipal
Facilities Turf Conversion) implementation could be commenced within a few months after
receiving Council approval and the necessary ftmding. Finally, the Landscape Regulations
Update (#4) could commence immediately, but would require evaluation of DWR's model
ordinance (released on January I, 2009) before development of a City-specific standard and
revisions to the Landscape Manual and the Water Conservation Plan Guidelines (estimated to
take 6 months) could occur. In addition, Council action on a new landscape ordinance, if
deemed necessary, would require public notice and public readings before formal adoption. The
program's timeline is summarized below:
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
44 of 58
2-47
CCWG MEASURE #7: TURF LAWN CONVERSION
Implementation Plan Tlmellne
PROGRAM MilESTONES
Ju
July '09
Jan '09 . Present Council ne'NWater
. Secure financing ior Conser'latian Plan, Landscape
progr.>ms Manual & possible ordinance
I I I
I I I
ly'08 J. '09 July '09
I
)an'09 FeD '09 Mar '09
. Begin evaluation of .Initiateccntractorbid o Hire & [rain staff
DlVR Madel Landscape process for corrmuni~ lor NatureScape &
Ordinance lawn conversions community lawn
. Commence design -:Of1VefSlon
workonmunicipaltt.Jrt program
COr:lverslonprojects
BUDGET
The annual program costs associated with the NatureScape and Residential & Business Turf
Conversion components combined are $202,800. It is estimated that the Municipal Facilities
Turf Conversion would cost $300,000 annually, while the Landscape Regulations Update
component is estimated to cost $156,380. These cost ,estimates would cover all personnel,
supplies and services. These program costs assume full funding of all seven CCWG measures
and will leverage each measure's budget to partially cover administrative and performance
tracking costs. While components # 1 and #2 would need funding indefinitely to maintain them, ,
the Landscape Regulations Update component would only continue until the ordinance was
developed and possibly adopted (approximately through CY 201O)~ However, the State's
proposed Model Water Conservation Ordinance includes a requirement for ongoing community
water auditing generating a need for an extra Open Space Division staff person estimated at
$202,350 annually. The Municipal Facilities Turf Conversion would continue only until all
selected sites had been re-Iandscaped with water-saving plants and efficient irrigation systems.
Implementation costs would be partially offset by available water district incentives. In addition,
municipal water cost savings would average approximately $7,900 annually for every acre of turf
lawn area converted to water-wise landscaping. There are potentially a variety of possible
funding sources for Measure #7 including a carbon offset fee, franchise fee, local fee authority
and a general obligation bond. The program's budget is outlined below:
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1, 2008
45 of 58
2-48
CCWG #7 - Outdoor Water Conservation Program - Budget
City Staff
$88,000
Intems
$49,000
NatureScape,
Residential & Business Marketing
Turf Conversions.
$20,000
Other Commodities
$45,800
TOTAL
$202,800
City Staff ------ $50,000
Municipal Facilities Turf Other Commodities ------ $250,000
Conversion
TOTAL -~---- $300,000
Landscape Regulations City Staff $156,380 $202,350
Update TOTAL $156,380 $202,350
TOTAL $156,380
$705,150
*Assumes cost sharing between CCWG Measur~s #3, 5 & 7 for staff time & program materials
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July t, 1008
46 of 58
2-49
OVERALL PROGR~ ADMINISTRA nON
FINANCING OPTIONS
To fund the program, staff has identified and analyzed a variety of financing options
(summarized in Table 3) to support the seven measures and their budgets estimated at
$1,479,380 in one-time costs and $2,419,150 in annual costs. These budgets include costs
associated with staff time, materials and contractor services to implement the programs as well
as capital improvement projects. . Additional costs associated with providing upfront capital for
residents and businesses to install renewable and energy-efficiency improvements (Measure #5)
is not included and would be dependent on the level of community program participation, but
could easily reach $50,000,000 over 5-10 years (assumes 5,000 homeslbusinesses participating at
$10,000 per property). If additional funds are not secured, there would be significant
implications on the level ofimplementation possible for the seven measures (Table 4).
As a result, staff is recommending that the City pursue a variety of funding sources to meet both
the long-term, ongoing program management costs as well as the short-term, large upfront
capital improvement costs required to implement the seven measures. Sustainable, long-term
funding could be secured through establishment of a "local fee authority" and/or increasing the
City's energy franchise fee. A local fee authority has been granted in the past by the state
legislature to enable local governments to fund environmental programs and services. For
example, Chula Vista received fee authority under Assembly Bill 939 to fund municipal solid
waste, recycling and household hazardous waste programs. To secure funding for the seven
proposed climate-related programs, the City could engage state representatives to pursue
legislation allowing fee authority for local greenhouse gas emissions reduction efforts. The
City's current energy franchise fee - paid by SDG&E (and passed through to the customer) for
the nonexclusive right to install and maintain equipment qn highways, streets or public rights of
way - is 1.25% and 2% of citywide annual gross electricity and natural gas revenues,
respectively. In 2002, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved a SDG&E
franchise fee increase for the City of San Diego of 3.53% (electricity revenues) in order to
underground power lines in residential areas. Chula Vista could pursue CPUC approval to
increase the City's energy franchise fees to support its greenhouse gas reduction efforts.
Because a local fee authority and franchise fees are based on each individual ratepayer's
consumption level, both funding mechanisms also help promote energy conservation in the
community by rewarding ratepayers who consume less energy with lower fee amounts. Both
potential revenue sources would be used to reimburse the City for staff time and materials costs
associated with ongoing program implementation and reporting.
Unlike a local fee authority or franchise fee, a public bond issued by the City and secured
through increased sales tax, transient occupancy ta.'( and/or property taxes could quickly provide
large, upfront capital improvement funds required to implement some of the seven measures.
The bonds could have two specific applications: (I) provide capital funds for energy efficiency
and solar retrofits for residential and business facilities (Measure #5) and (2) provide funds for
public purpose climate-related programs such as municipal renewable energy installation,
alternative fuel fleet improvements and turf conversion. Under application #1, participating
property owners would elect to be part of a special assessment district and their increased
property fees would be applied to the bond's debt service. Under application #2, all Chula Vista
property owners would vote in a general election whether to authorize a municipal bond issuance
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1, 2008
47 of 58
2-50
Table 3: Summary of financing options and their applicability to the CCWG measures
Building Permit
Fees
The City's building permit fees could be increased
to cover the additional costs associated with
implementing a citywide, mandatory green building
standard.
Carbon Offset
Fee
A fee for developers and builders to "offset" their
carbon emissions if they are unable to meet
citywide, green building standards.
Franchise Fee
The City's franchise fee with SOG&E for gross
electricity and natural gas delivery could be
increased (currently at 1.25% and 2% of citywide
annual gross electricity and natural gas receipts,
respectively).
Grants
Grant funding could be solicited from local, state
and federal agencies.
Local Fee
Authority
A fee authority would enable the City to place a
local surcharge on utility bills and would require
state legislature approval.
Because there is a nexus between permit fee revenues
and city development levels, permit fees may not
provide a consistent funding source. Therefore, it may
be more useful as a supplement to another long-term
funding source.
4,5
These funds would be used to pay for on-the-ground
energy efficiency, renewable energy and alternative fuel
vehicle improvement projects. The fund could also be
incorporated into the CEOA project review and
mitigation process.
1,2,4, S, 7
Currently, the City of San Diego has a higher SOG&E
franchise fee than Chula Vista (5.78% of electricity and
1.03% of natural gas revenues).
All - Staff & Resources
1, 5, 7 - Public Improvements
Grant funding is typically short-lived and project~specific
(Le. not for ongoing programs). Therefore, it may be
more useful as a suppiement to another long-term
funding source.
All
Similar to how AB 939 created a fee authority for local
governments to fund solid waste/recycling programs,
the City could pursue local fee authority for greennouse
gas emissions reduction programs. The City would
need to engage local state legislators to pursue tile fee
authority.
AII- Staff & Resources
1, 5, 7 . Public Improvements
A bond could have two possible applications:
(A) Pay for financing energy efficiency & renewable
energy improvements on private properties and the
A ublic bond could be issued and secured through parti~jpating property ?W~ers would elect to be, part of a Asses:ment Oi~tricts:
. P d I . t dl speCial assessment district to payback tile bond. S - ~taff & Private Improvements
Increase sa es tax, transient occupancy ax an or (8) Through a general election, ail Chula Vista property Genera! Obligation:
property tax. owners could elect to issue a bond to fund public 1,5,7. Staff & Public Improvements
purpose climate change-related programs (such as
municipal renewable energy and alternative fuel fleet
improvements).
Public Bond
.Additional research IS needed to ensure that City is in compliance with Proposition 218 and applicable tax laws
and assess themselves an additional fee to repay the debt service. The amortization schedule for
either bond application is estimated to be between 10-15 years (solar energy systems are required
by State legislation to have at least 25-year warranties). Staff is recommending that the fee
assessment be structured to include solar energy system replacement costs adding extra value for
program participants and ensuring an economically and environmentally sustainable future.
Other potential furiding sources for the seven climate-related measures include establishing a
City-controlled carbon offset fund, increasing building permit fees and applying for public
grants. As part of the City's CEQA environmental review process and new Green Building
Standard (Measure #4), the City could create a fee system for developers and builders to "offset"
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July t, 2008
48 of 58
2-51
their carbon emissions if they are unable to meet CEQA significance thresholds for a project's
greenhouse gas emissions impacts or comply with the new citywide building standards. These
funds would be used to subsidize on-the-ground energy efficiency, renewable energy and
alternative fuel vehicle improvements at municipal facilities or within existing building stock
preferably targeting lower income families and service institutions. Increasing building permit
fees would have a more limited application and be mainly used to cover the additional costs
associated with administering a citywide, mandatory green building standard. It should be noted
that both CEQA reviews and permit fees are directly linked to development levels and may not
provide consistent, long-term funding. Finally, grant funds could be solicited from local, state
and national sources, but the funds are typically short-lived and project-specific (i.e. not for
ongoing programs). Therefore, staff recommends that a carbon offset fund, increased building
permit fees and public grant funds be pursued as part of the measures' financing strategy, but
should be used primarily to supplement other long-term funding sources such as a local fee
authority or a franchise fee increase.
Table 4: Implications on program implementation if no new funds are secured
Partial - Only ICLEI participation
Admin. Emissions Tracking & Reporting (Generai Fund) - No 3rd party verification
- No future AB32 compliance
100% Clean Vehicle Partial - Delayed implementation
(Vehicie Replacement
Replacement Policy for City Fleet Fund) - No biodiesel use
100% Clean Vehicle Partial - No H21CE van project
2 Replacement Policy for City,
Contracted Fleet Services (General Fund) - No H2CNG bus project
3 Business Energy Assessments Full Expected - Funding only thru 12/11
(SDG&E)
4 Green Building Standard Full Expected - Funding only thru 12/11
(Permit Feesl SDG&E)
5 Solar & Energy Efficiency None - Only solar PV code creation
Conversion - No community solar program
6 Smart Growth Around Trolley Partial - Delayed implementation
Stations (Various)
- Limited Nat~reScape program
7 Outdoor Water Conservation Partial - Delayed regulations update
(General Fund) - No community turf replacement
- No municipal turf replacement
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1, 2008
49 of 58
2-52
IMPLEMENTATION COORDINATION, EMISSIONS TRACKING & REPORTING
While various departments will be responsible for implementing the specific measures (see
individual implementation plans for details on departmental roles and responsibilities), the
Department of Conservation & Environmental Services will coordinate overall measurement,
evaluation and reporting of the seven climate protection measures and the resulting greenhouse'
gas emissions reductions. The primary tool for tracking the emissions reductions will continue
to be an annual, citywide greenhouse gas emissions inventory with technical assistance provided
by rCLEr and the California Climate Action Registry. Staff is currently working with rCLEr, the
California Air Resources Board and the California Climate Action Registry to develop a more
robust emissions protocol specifically for local governments. With the new protocol, staff will
be able to more accurately track and report the impacts of the seven climate protection measures.
The City will also begin to participate in the verification process under the California Climate
Action Registry program. Verification is performed by an approved third-party contractor to
insure that the emissions data is accurate, transparent and consistent with all reporting guidelines.
Participation in the California Climate Action Registry will help the City measure and manage
emissions from municipal operations and facilities, while preparing Chula Vista for potential
new regulations under the California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB32). Registry
participation will also enable Chula Vista to document carbon reductions for consideration under
any future emissions trading system.
The annual cost for implementation coordination, emissions tracking and reporting is estimated
to be $93,300. This cost assumes full funding for CCWG measures #3, 5 and 7 in order to
partially cover these administrative and performance tracking costs. The program's annual
budget is outlined below:
CCWG Admin - Coordination, Tracking & Reporting -
Budget
City Staff
$64,000
Registry Memberships
$4,900
Emissions Inventory Verification
$10,000
Other Commodities
$14,400
TOTAL
$93,300
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
50 of 58
2-53
APPENDIX A - Quantity of vehicles to be replaced each year with hybrid,
alternative fuel or ultra low emissions substitutes (by vehicle class)
Intermediate Sedan 3 7 6 3 2 0 7 0 5 5
Full Size Sedan 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0
Compact SUV 1 0 , , 0 1 4 3 2
0 0
Large SUV 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
Intermediate Pickup 4 12 5 6 7 0 14 2 0
Truck
Full Size Pickup Truck 0 5 II 14 8 9 5 3 2
Full Size Crew Cab 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 3
Picku Truck
Intermediate Van 0 2 0 0 0 2 I 2
Cargo Van , 3 7 0 1 3 0 0
0
Full Size Passenger Van 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Walk-in Van 0 0 1 0 0 0
Survey Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Full Size Utility Truck 2 2 3 0 0 0
Large Utility Truck 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0
Flatbed Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
TOTAL 13 28 31 37 35 14 38 17 18 12
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council) .
July 1,2008
51 of 58
2-54
APPENDIX B - Incremental cost difference (in dollars) each year for
replacing existing fleet vehicles with hybrid, alternative fuel or ultra low
emissions substitutes (by vehicle class)
;it'~Bifli\lt:W~~J~_l~t\lIf~~;;~.,..,; >> .. ~~T'~;~~~~liII:
I
,-i!iJ!!;<JI!>"i >",>,t~>>"> > '~
..,.,. ," -'-."".,~ ,,~,.,.,..,-,,'. ,. .' .-'" ""',.
Intermediate Sedan 15,000 35,000 I 30,000 15,000 lO,OOO 0 35,000 0 25,000 25,000
Full Size Sedan 0 0 10,000 15,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 0
Compact SUV 7,000 21,000 21,000 0 7,000 7,000 28,000 21,000 14,000
Large S UV 0 7,000 0 0 0 14,000 7,000 0 0 0
Intermediate Pickup 28,000 84,000 35,000 42,000 49,000 0 98,000 7,000 14,000 0
Truck
Full Size Pickup 0 7,000 35,000 77,000 98,000 56,000 63,000 35,000 21,000 14,000
Truck
Full Size Crew Cab 0 7,000 0 0 14,000 0 7,000 14,000 21,000 7,000
Pickun Truck
Intermediate Van 0 14,000 7,000 7,000 0 0 0 14,000 7,000 14,000
Cargo Van 21,000 7,000 21,000 49,000 0 7,000 21,000 7,000 0 0
Full Size Passenger 0 0 7,000 0 14,000 0 0 0 0 0
Van
Walk-in Van 0 7,000 0 7,000 7,000 7,000 0 7,000 0 0
Survey Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,000 0 0 0
Full Size Utility 14,000 7,000 7,000 14,000 21,000 7,000 7,000 0 0 0
Truck
Large Utility Truck 0 0 21,000 0 21,000 0 0 7,000 0 0
Flatbed Truck 0 7,000 7,000 0 0 0 0 0 7,000 0
TOTAL 85,000 182,000 201,000 247,000 222,000 98,000 252,000 119,000 116,000 74,000
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
52 of 58
2-55
APPENDIX C - Conservation-focused municipal code related to businesses
Municipal Code 8.23 - 8.25: Solid Waste
All commercial and industrial establishments shall submit recycling tonnage documentation on
an annual basis to the city's conservation coordinator, due on or before January 31st, for the
previous year. Annual reporting shall be on the form promulgated by the city manager, and
commence on the first. anniversary of the date set forth in the mandatory recycling
implementation schedule as established in this chapter as July 1, 1993. Voluntary reporting prior
to the required mandatory recycling is encouraged. (Ord. 2992 9 1,2005; Ord. 2740 9 3, 1998;
Ord. 249ig 1,1992).
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1, 2008
53 of 58
2-56
APPENDIX D - Table A from "Architecture 2030: Meeting the 2030
Challenge through Building Codes"
Table A: 2030 Challenge Interim C<>de Equivalents
CODE I STANDARD
COMMERCIAL
RESIDENTIAL
I~SHRAE 90,1-2004
30% b&low
ASHRAE 189 (in progress)
o
Calj-fQrnia Title 24 2005
15% - 20'36 b~low~~
O~gon Energy Code's
25% be-low
30% below
RES NET HERS Index
65 or Jess
lED 2009 (in progress)
New. EA Credit ill: 7 ;lts
Renovation. EA CrlJait #1: 9pts
EECC Optionl;j (prascriptivO! path)
EC -154
NOT~: iable A.3,OO\fe represents '! set cf guicsiines. Each entity should i:SS8.$S its particular code 3M building ~ner~
consumption pat'ems ar.d adjust the code equivalents provided in the table ,;IS 3pprcpriato. rQrinample, these entitie~
with Bggr'es3iva GHG and ene~ reduction inltisti'le$ ma~ want to increase tha recommended percentage reductions.
Entit~s with detailed information on code performance compared to :heir building stock are ~ncowrag~ '.c ~djust the
perccnta~e reductions ro meat the 2030 Challen,gs targ;ets.
L" Th~ City of San~ ear!:a~ established meeting the 2030 Challenge tar~t ior single-family :esid~ntial \.lnlts at 20% below iitJe 24and
for hi.eh-nse residential. at 15% below ntle 24.
j.. Sased on preliminary code analysis for th.. Califcmla energy ~mmission by Charles EJey of ,Architec'1Jr:31 Energy Corporation.
:\."; Oregon u2partrnent ~i ;;:nergy, .Comparison oi Or"!!gon ;;:Mr,~ '"Ada 2005 & .JlSHRAE Standard 90.l-2.004",
1~ For resldentJal buildings 1J3stof the cascade Mountains, U::lS 25% below, For residential building\) we::lt of tl1e Cascades. l!se 30% bele
H Green Building Initiative, ?roposoo Amarican National St.anclard 01-:2008P.
to! .Alliance. 'D Sa'le E.1erg" Eneir~ Effte:entC.::des Coalition IE:::CC), Tne 30% Sclutior.'/EC.154. This option provides a methcc :"or
modifying me pr~riptiv., path of the. code to meet ,jr ~~c~ed the 2030 Ch'i!lllerrge 50% reduc<Jon target.
18 New Buildings Inl:ltitute, A..1vanced Buildings Core Perfcrmance Guide with Ilnhanced measur~s. ihis option prcvic:!es d method for
l1'lodlf"fing the prescriptive path of the code to meet or ~ceed the :2030 ChBJleng'3 50% ~dlJction target.
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
54 of 58
2-57
APPENDIX E - Draft Carbon Reduction Checklist
CARBON REDUCTION CHECKLIST
~v?--
~:8
=
'JT(O
ouJL-\ ;ON!.
S1J1r~~"""'!l~n~7{illg~]~j'~.?ffl&;;~~~t\);<!~:i1':i':$!!~i!tih'J;1~oiJ
COffi'ANT .'IAME:
COt-WAN'" ACO~ess:
err(:
CONTACT:
STATE;
~"
PHONe !!MAIL.:
~p:Rolif(;:r;IN'~9RMAfi:oWi'5~j~~t7rt1!~;~+';!~f5~1$fj)~il$l:~jfr:tJn:~~~n1~j$iTw:t?t~~~~~tt~i?:~~~:l?itF,,~
j>P:CJe;::T ADDRESS:
P!l.OjEC':'rtP: U <Aol",...,rd;1/ SQUA~EFOOr,'Ci::
f'Aitr OF- OEVaO?NENT)
[J ~m!O'IUm
I~ ;t.<:U'7l/lt
'-'
SOFTWARE U URB:<;H1S
0 Pl.Ace?s
0 C:her.
.,
c....:
CLIMATe: ZONE:
c
7(.ISn:.~t...fL)
o JOI.J5lb111~lt.l
EMML'ilONS RffiUC110NTAR'C:!IT {pounds ~f CO,):
L!SCFCO,:
LS$CFCO}
TOTAL OEVEl.OPMENT CREDITS (!Ot,r" ''l-It" LBSOFCO)
f,E.NE'RaY,E",Fi:ciENCV::C~Di:rilli' ,- ~mTh:B~,itii;";;:.iii>;~ut\."<<#'"'m!"',";E!!I-ii~:tt;1IYi:ii~:i;'12.-"':'bt,11'flf';;-;-{4?~"1€{€';t#h'~.,",,,q,f;tttif~~$~~~n~'
'. ';";W~~l\'~'..;j.:t:_~-""i;%3i~SH;>}0'--'-iq6#.1~eUM,;:r:,,"'ZONE, ,:, ", ~'f\2?yt , -,:Jf;4s;.s:;;t;itoiJ.1dtCf'lMATEZQ;NIit. '''.."t1PW~1V..q~llft't.~'J$l~''9i:W4'W'
~'~""r1P~'''',~'1q.,t!'6;l?''~'VF:-Fi~,. .;;,:,'>;:;'":~'M!';H)',,,,;t\'1;'';;l"~*'K:n;" ,t..._%>t<R(~j5t!W'~S'~'-1'.A,,;y,,~t\'R~i4L~$&}1~;,:N::l ',;;;r1k~i"h"'''9'i'ia'1"
r'r'''<:$SW~t....H""u!r(EF''=,as) I:] ,-+!b"~q.ft.af::~ ; , ....lbu<<t<::-"'fCO,
COO'111.QQI I , .r!1xf1~.It.QfCO: C .2Ib$/~q.fl.QfCO,
I.Co.'It$tLler.Q i.J .llbwlQ.l1..ofC,?: CJ .2 IbvVl.ft cfCO,
i\.J8in Atn<:: [1' .J ib~~l1..ofCO, Cl .2Jb:ll~ft.<)fCO,
fl.....'1ir.At~~ [J .!lbfll<:.n..,fCO n ,1 IbJilq. f-:. of CO:
.JO/.2SVlllndow U-l"ltto<'i$HGC f'i .11tJ.1i1..~fl..ofCO: LJ .J tb~/~q. :'t. 9f CO;'
.9AFUE.=um:.<::c C! .ISIi).tfIq.ft.,,(CO, rl .2Ib1hq.ft.c,fCO;
,91AfUEFurn~o: ' . .lalb1ilq.flQiCO.. C .2Slla/.q.:t~fCO,
I~ ~EE..~"'C CJ ,llb'If'4tt<>fCO, CJ .1 n../-.q. it. of CO,
ISS~'\AC (], JS1!><"...it.ofCO~ - .2SIbd~J;fI."ICC,
I&SEitAC iJ .2 Ib<l:q. iI. of CO, [J ,)lbu..q.f\.."fCO:
TOTAL PI"e<<t'".ptllloO CREOITS [ToT.:ll 'K lq. It .. laS OF CO,) [Too/x 14 It .. LBS,OF CO;)
il.p.;ff<.~~;:a)'@i~~~~~~~':i(e'l;::@$7ANoAAD'.1Lik:~~ii}~~~-]~~p~~.!>tt.(~~&~r~~'i:~.i1~~d~
SF"'<;llH""lint(~kajUM.rllbu'k!ITIJ)
Sp"l\:CCO<lr,~t.Sollr-a:k.aTt.Jl1t.j7Ihsll<llTUl
W~Ulr H~tingiS~1l kSTUld.1 t IbJ,r'l<eTU)
TOTAl.. P.rio....,:mc. CIt.l:OITS {Tot;Jj x ~q. fl =,LBS OF CO,) l;To~ ~ l".il: = Ul~01" CO,)
ic):~!to1(;.~~d:Qn:piili1iN'?'Jfim~*~tRCtjH.f.TE:Zq~:lii:?liHPr~~~g~~fi44Jt~i;i"MA'T;e;z6~EII0~~'efJ2€~~lM~1!~
$<)I=-- ;>.lr'Id '(NV ;tl.u:ile,J CJ; 1.~l)O IbdKW 0 1.700IbtJl(W
Xli... Hct'M.c.. H= 501,... f........
CJ .1:llrs/'q.rt.?o-,1 :;<Il~rF>aor
CJ 1.+OtlIlxIKW
l.7r~Ilq.11..
~q.Ft (tb.<I(CO;)" UlS OF CO.;
TOTAL leS OF CO,:
U .12Ib<l<q~'t.fId".l$cL>lrF:.C:ll:r
" 1.4QO!bIilKW
o 2.)lbd_Uj,ft.
Sq.n(lb1QICO.l ~L3S0fCO;
'N~dTurbill(l KW imu.11<:d
"i1.SOIlb",
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
55 of 58
2-58
APPENDIX F - Chula Vista Climate Zone Map
err.""
.'':''':::''''l!I:Z
...~r~
""""'"
'<"'-=
",rr,;<
C'UAV=
Climate Zones Map
Girl cf Chula VIS<a
C,::::rn.G::!!l~r:-e ~X3,"'{
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1,2008
2-59
.:.:
56 of 58
APPENDIX G - Draft Existing Building Efficiency Retrofit Options
Tier 1: Minimum Renuirements Cost Notes
Insulation, Envelope Sealing/Duct
Seaiing/Duct Design, Ventilation (Attic
Weatherization' , $7,000 Fan, House Fan, Ceiiina Fans), Doors
Attic Insulationl?1l $99/so ft $80 $0.99 oer souare foot '
ENERGY STAR Refrioerator(<550 kWh) $1,500
Low Flow Faucets/Showers $30 $10 faucet, $20 showerhead
Dual/Low Flow Toilets $250 $250 oer unit
Proorammable Thermostat $50
Waterless Urinal $350
Variable Freouencv or Dual Saeed Pool Motor $250
Indoor CFL or LED Eauivalent $40
Outdoor CFL or LED Eouivalent $40
Total $9,590
!!Hl~"""fli!iil""-i'!iJ!~~'iiIF ~"C"'"'lt1!ijf,;'~. """"~"'I\\"l1l\\"~Jli1ji[""'JI"~""-i!ffl~li1rdi't""""~a
~'.;-__ f.:,*,"'~,_ ji'?i~~,"ij )wi.,,;fr,~ <~fiW:';j)f,,: 'I;.,W ~_~... 'I mi'- ,,,-,,,"""-'~L~ ' ,-:.s\'i.~fi:t~>M:.--,.,.- ,. -~"!T':t#.l?'iC:
'" l L OM .,. .', "-'\1"0,,,,,~,,. ..1':;, f;~ .m..,,,,.] 'I ,-_'~__,._ ,ill"""'.. "..,,/' ,;.; "'_"_'-~"'_! . -., "" kM'__~', .~_, "" ..n."L ','
,li!T:...Cost ~~"'" ..""".il!ii"",,,.,i:tJi,,,,,,Notes.. ......"JI!j":;,,,,.%..
::wler.,2.;GonchtronahO t!OnS;~0iLF""';',"1 ....'U,_,d,_ mM~.
Dual Paned Windows 1I0wer) $5,000
Dishwasher $700
Front Load Clothes Washer $900
SEER 19 or above HVAC $5,000
Recirculatina Water Pump $300
Evaoo-Transniration (F=T) Water Controller $300'
Tankless Water Heater $900
Turf Removal/NatureScaoe $5,000
Total $13,100
'''~~,"",1\il!1i~~~~i'~ ":~"" . "
'IAiiieri3!Benewarile~0piions~4:~~J[~~, :':fci. -,= J}os
PV $42,000
Solar Thermal ater $65,000
Domestic Solar Water Heater $6,500
Total
$8,000
$121,500
Rebates & bulk discounis included
2kW system $5000 + Inverter and
Labor
Wind (Electricl
'Federal Weatherization Assistance Program
Based on 2500 sq foot residence, 2.5
bathrooms
$2750 avg
ccwa Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July I, 2008
57 of 58
2-60
APPENDIX H - Existing municipal code requiring solar hot water pre-
plumbing on all new residential buildings
Municipal Code 20.04.030: Solar Water Heater Preplumbing
All new residential units shall include plumbing specifically designed to allow the later
installation of a system which utilizes solar energy as the primary means of heating domestic
potable water. No building permit shall be issued unless the plumbing required pursuant to this
section is indicated on the building plans. Pre plumbing shall extend through the roof when the
slope .of the roof is less than four inches and 12 inches and when the roof covering is of clay or
concrete tile. Preplumbing pipes for domestic solar hot water heating shall be insulated. This
section shall apply only to those residential dwelling units for which a building permit was
applied for after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter.
Exception: The provisions of this chapter can be modified or waived when it can be
satisfactorily demonstrated to the building official that the solar preplumbing is impractical due
to shading, building orientation, construction constraints or configuration of the parcel. (Ord.
1973 S 1, 1982).
CCWG Implementation Plans (As Adopted by City Council)
July 1, 2008
58 of 58
2-61
ORDINA1'fCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA A1\fENDING
CHAPTERS 20.04 AND 5.02 OF THE CHULA VISTA
MlJNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTIONS 20.04.025 Ai'iD
20.04.050 AND A CROSS REFERENCE IN SECTION 5.02
The City Council of the City ofChula Vista does ordain as follows:
SECTION I. That Chapter 20.04 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Chapter 20.04
ENERGY CONSERVATION REGULATIONS
Sections:
20.04.010 Intent and purpose of provisions.
20.04.020 Conflict with other provisions.
20.04.025 Definitions.
20.04.030 Solar water heater preplumbing.
20.04.050 Business energv assessments.
20.04.010 Intent and purpose of provisions.
The conservation of energy and natural resources has been determined to be a
legitimate and worthy function of the city. The' provisions of this chapter are
intended to decrease dependence upon nonrenewable energy sources by
encouraging and, in some instances, requiring the installation of devices,
structures or materials for the conservation of energy on certain structures within
the city.
20.04.020 Conflict with other provisions.
Portions of this chapter which are in conflict with other sections of the
municipal code are intended to be exceptions to those sections and shall take
precedence over such section"s.
20.04.025 Definitions.
The following words and phrases. when used in this chapter. shall be
construed as defined in this section:
A. "Assessment" means a written evaluation of a facilitv's energy use from
buildinS! systems. appliances and office equipment.
B. "EnerS!v Conservation" means reduction of enerS!v use achieved bv relying on
chanS!es to behavior.
C. "EnerS!v Efficiencv" means activities or proS!rams that reduce enerS!v use bv
upgrading to more efficient equipment or controls.
D. "Greenhouse Gas Emission" means the direct or indirect emission of one or
more of the six gases identified in the Kvoto Protocol.
J:\AttorneylQrdinance'>.Busirlcss::nergyOrdinance(redlinel_IO.Zl..Q8.doc
2-62
Ordinance No.
Page 2
E. "Nonrenewable" means an energy resource that is not replaced or is replaced
onlv verv slowlv bv natural processes.
F. "Solar Water Heater" means a device that heats domestic water bv allowim!
solar enerzv collectors to transfer solar heat ener!:!v to water.
20.04.030 Solar water heater preplumbing.
All new residential units shall include plumbing specifically designed to allow
the later installation of a system which utilizes solar energy as the primary means
of heating domestic potable water. No building permit shall be issued unless the
plumbing required pursuant to this section is indicated on the building plans.
Preplumbing shall extend through the roof when the slope of the roof is less than
four inches and 12 inches and when the roof covering is of clay or concrete tile.
Preplumbing pipes for domestic solar hot water heating shall be insulated. This
section shall apply only to those residential dwelling units for which a building
permit was applied for after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this
chapter.
Exception: The provisions of this chapter can be modified or waived when it
can be satisfactorily demonstrated to the building ofticial that the solar
preplumbing is impractical due to shading, building orientation, construction
constraints or configuration of the parcel.
20.04.050 Business energv assessments.
All commercial and industrial businesses in the Citv of Chula Vista are
encoura!:!ed to participate in a free ener!:!V Assessment of their facilities to help
themidentifv Enemv Efticiencv and Conservation opportunities that potentiallv
reduce participants. reoccurrinz enerzv costs and correspondinz Greenhouse Gas
Emissions. Assessments are recommended when a new business license is issued
or once even three vears for an existin!:! license. Participatinz businesses are
encoura!:!ed to cooperate with Citv staff or their delegate( s) bv IJroviding: I) a date
and time for the Assessment convenient for the business. 2) access to their
facilities for the Assessment durinz their rezular business hours. 3) authorization
to review their historical ener!:!v usaze and 4) a signature and title of a facilitv
mana!:!er on a completed Assessment form acknowledgin!:! that the business has
received a completed Assessment and relevant information about voluntarv
Ener!:!v Efficiencv improvement opportunities. The owner of a multi-tenant
commercial buildinz or their desiznee (propertv ma..llager) mav. at their discretion.
authorize a whole. building Assessment replacinz the need for individual tenant
Assessments.
Assessment Notification Process: The Citv mav send a notice to each
business at least once everv three vears in coni unction with the Citv's a..nnual
business license renewal mailer providin!:! information that facilitates the
schedulin!:! of an Assessment at the business's convenience. A business mav also
receive a business Assessment notice whenever a new license is required such as
the establishment of a new business or transfer of ovmership for an existin!:!
business.
J:\AttQmey\Oniina.nce\Busin~ss Energy Ordinance (redline)_IO-Zl-OS.doc
2-63
Ordinance No.
Page 3
Assessment Deliverables: The Assessment findings. provided to the
parTicipating business on a form established bv the Citv Manager in conjunction
with the local utilitv and business representatives. mav include a chart of their
historical energv consumption. an estimate of potential energy and cost savings
from identified Energv Conservation and Etliciencv opportunities and an estimate
of the corresponding Greenhouse Gas Emission reductions. The Assessment may
also review water conservation. alternative transPorTation and other practices
which the business could implement and/or promote to its employees and
customers and an estimate of the resulting Greenhouse Gas Emission reductions.
The Citv mav offer participants assistance with completing the applicable rebate.
incentive aIld/or on-bill financing forms to facilitate the adOPtion of the identified
Energv Etliciencv improvements and help reduce the business's time and cost of
implementing the voluntary measures. The City may also provide contact
information for the local utilitv's program statl that may further assist the
business in reducing its energv costs.
Exclusions: Because Energv Efficiencv is commonlv related to a facilitv's
age and design. a voluntarv Energv Assessment is not recommended for new
businesses occupving a commercial space which have completed one of the
following: 1) been pelmined bv the Citv Building Division within the last three
years for a remodel or new construction to meet the most current Citv Title 24 and
above standards. 2) has been certified through a California Energv Commission-
approved (or other applicable state agency) green building program or 3) has
already receiyed an Assessment within the last three vears. In addition.
Assessments are not necessarv for home olllces. mobile businesses and other
business emities that do not have a utility gas or electric meter on' a commercial
rate schedule.
SECTION II. That the Cross Reference section of Chapter 5.02 of the Chula Vista Municipal
Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 5.02
BUSINESS LICENSES GENERALLY
CROSS REFERENCE: Business Energv Assessments. see Ch. 20.04 CYMC.
Charitable Solicitations, see Ch. 9.21 CVMe. Obstructing Streets, see Ch. 12.12
CYMC. Building and Construction Permits, see CYMC Title 15.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty days from its adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Michael Meacham
Director of Conservation & Environmental
Services
Bart C. Miesfeld
Interim City Anorney
l:lAnorney\Ordinance\Business Energy Ordinance (redline)_lO.~ I.08,doc
2-64
ORDINAt~CE NO.
ORDINA..NCE OF THE CITY OF CHlJLA VISTA A..l\1ENDING
CRAJ'TERS 20.04 At'ID 5.02 OF THE CHlJLA VISTA
MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTIONS 20.04.025 AND
20.04.050 AND A CROSS REFERENCE IN SECTION 5.02
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
SECTION I. That Chapter 20.04 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Chapter 20.04
ENERGY CONSERVATION REGULATIONS
Sections:
20.04.010 Intent and purpose of provisions.
20.04.020 Contlict with other provisions.
20.04.025 Definitions.
20.04.030 Solar water heater preplumbing.
20.04.050 Business energy assessments.
20.04.010 Intent and purpose of provisions.
The conservation of energy and natural resources has been determined to be a
legitimate and worthy function of the city. The 'provisions of this chapter are
intended to decrease dependence upon nonrenewable energy sources by
encouraging and, in some instances, requiring the installation of devices,
structures or materials for the conservation of energy on certain structures within
the city.
20.04.020 Conflict with other provisions.
Portions of this chapter which are in conflict with other sections of the
municipal code are intended to be exceptions to those sections and shall take
precedence over such sections.
20.04.025 Definitions..
The following words and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall be
construed as defined in this section:
A. "Assessment" means a written evaluation of a facility's energy use from
building systems, appliances and office equipment.
B. "Energy Conservation" means reduction of energy use achieved by relying on
changes to behavior.
C. "Energy Efficiency" means activities or programs that reduce energy use by
upgrading to more efficient equipment or controls.
D. "Greenhouse Gas Emission" means the direct or indirect emission of one or
more of the six gases identified in the Kyoto Protocol.
J:\AUQmeyIOrdin:mccIBusjness Energy Onii,,~nce (cle'Jn ccJ_1 O-~ I-OS.doc
2-65
Ordinance No.
Page 2
E. "Nonrenewable" means an energy resource that is not replaced or is replaced
only very slowly by natura! processes.
F. "Solar Water Heater" means a device that heats domestic water by allowing
solar energy collectors to transfer solar heai energy to water.
20.04.030 Solar water heater preplumbing.
All new residential units shall include plumbing specifically designed to allow
the later installation of a system which utilizes solar energy as the primary means
of heating domestic potable water. No building permit shall be issued unless the
plumbing required pursuant to this section is indicated on the building plans.
Preplumbing shall extend through the roof when the slope of the roof is less than
four inches and 12 inches and when the roof covering is of clay or concrete tile.
Preplumbing pipes for domestic solar hot water heating shall be insulated. This
section shall apply only to those residential dwelling units for which a building
permit was applied for after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this
chapter.
Exception: The provisions of this chapter can be modified or waived when it
can be satisfactorily demonstrated to the building official that the solar
preplumbing is impractical due to shading, building orientation, construction
constraims or configuration of the parcel.
20.04.050 Business energy assessments.
All commercial and industrial businesses in the City of Chula Vista are
encouraged to participate in a free energy Assessment of their facilities to help
them identify Energy Efficiency and Conservation opportunities that potentially
reduce participants' reoccurring energy costs and corresponding Greenhouse Gas
Emissions. Assessments are recommended when a new business license is issued
or once every three years for an existing license. Participating businesses are
encouraged to cooperate with City staff or their delegate(s) by providing; 1) a date
and time for the Assessment convenient for the business, 2) access to their
facilities for the Assessment during their regular business hours, 3) authorization
to review their historical energy usage and 4) a signature and title of a facility
manager on a completed Assessment form acknowledging that the business has
received a completed Assessment and relevant information about voluntary
Energy Efficiency improvement opportunities. The owner of a multi-tenant
commercial building or their designee (property manager) may, at their discretion,
authorize a whole building Assessment replacing the need for individual tenant
Assessments.
Assessment Notification Process: The City may send a notice to each
business at least once every three years in conjunction with the City's annual
business license renewal mailer providing information that facilitates the
scheduling of an Assessment at the business's convenience. A business may also
receive a business Assessment notice whenever a new license is required such as
the establishment of a new business or transfer of ownership for an existing
business.
1:\Altomey\OrdinanceIBusincS5 En~rgyOrdillanc:(cleancc)_IO-2t-08.doc
2-66
Ordinance No.
Page 3
Assessment Deliverables: The Assessment findings, provided to the
participating business on a form established by the City Manager in conjunction
with the local utility and business representatives, may include a chart of their
historical energy consumption, an estimate of potential energy and cost savings
from identified Energy Conservation and Efficiency opportunities and an estimate
of the corresponding Greenhouse Gas Emission reductions. The Assessment may
also review water conservation, alternative transportation and other practices
which the business could implement and/or promote to its employees and.
customers and an estimate of the resulting Greenhouse Gas Emission reductions.
The City may offer participants assistance with completing the applicable rebate,
incentive and/or on-bill financing forms to facilitate the adoption of the identified
Energy Efficiency improvements and help reduce the business's time and cost of
implementing the voluntary measures. The City may also provide contact
information for the local utility's program staff that may further assist the
business in reducing its energy costs.
Exclusions: Because Energy Efficiency is commonly related to a facility's
age and design, a voluntary Energy Assessment is not recommended for new
businesses occupying a commercial space which have completed one of the
following: I) been permitted by the City Building Division within the last three
years for a remodel or new construction to meet the most current City Title 24 and.
above standards, 2) has been certified through a California Energy Commission-
approved (or other applicable state agency) green building program or 3) has
already received an Assessment within the last three years. In addition,
Assessments are not necessary for home offices,. mobile businesses and other
business entities that do not have a utility gas or electric meter on a commercial
rate schedule.
SECTION II. That the Cross Reference section of Chapter 5.02 of the Chula Vista Municipal
Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 5.02
BUSINESS LICENSES GENERALLY
CROSS REFERENCE: Business Energy Assessments, see Ch. 20.04 CVMe.
Charitable Solicitations, see Ch. 9.21 CVMC. Obstructing Streets, see Ch. 12.12
CVivIe. Building and Construction Permits, see CYMC Title 15.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty days from its adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by'
Michael Meacham
Director of Conservation & Environmental
Services
._~\ /-"'/, ( ( /1 "J
.. rJ.'. JOV!-U
/-:];~ ,'. t .
~"-:'''~ ,......,- ': ! '-.-,-
r-~art 9. Mies e
.J.(!' l\J.~lm City Attorney
J:\A(lomey\Ordin3nc~\Bu.sineS5 Energy Ordinance (clean ccl_IO-}1-08.Joc
2-67