Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/10/07 Item 6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~4. ~f:.. CITY OF =t ~ ~~ CHULA VISTA OCTOBER 7, 2008, Item~ ITEM TITLE: REPORT REGARDING REQUEST THAT THE CITY SEEK REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR LEGAL FEES INCURRED IN RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONS INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY ~t; INTERIM CITY MANAGER SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES D NO 0 SUMMARY This item has been prepared in response to a referral by Councilmembers Ramirez and Castaneda regarding reimbursement by the San Diego District Attorney's Office oflegal fees incurred by the City related to prosecution activities by the District Attorney's Public Integrity Unit. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed aCl1Vlty for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because adoption of the appendix to the Local Conflict of Interest Code does not result in a physical change to the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION That the Council take action as it deems appropriate. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. DISCUSSION At the City Council meeting on September 23, 2008, Councilmembers Castaneda and Ramirez requested that the City Attorney's office agendize an item to discuss a request to the District Attorney for reimbursement of legal fees paid by the City in connection with prosecutorial activities by the District Attorney's Public Integrity Unit. In response, the l:\AlIomeyIJILLMIAGENDA STATEMENTS\Rqstlor DA 10 reimburse Legal fees (~~c,ofBCM redlineJ_IQ-07-08.doc OCTOBER 7, 2008, Item" Page 2 of2 City Attorney's office prepared a memorandum to the Councilmembers. The memorandum has been provided to the Councilmembers under separate cover. The memorandum is not included with this agenda statement because it is protected by the evidentiary privileges attached to attorney-client communications and documents constituting attorney work product; it is also protected from disclosure by California Government Code ~6254(k). DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section I 8704.2(a)(1) is not applicable to this decision. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. A TT ACHMENTS None. Prepared by: Jill D.S. Maland. Deputy City Attorney. Attorney J:lAllome.vV/LLMIAGENDA STATEMENTS\Rqs/jor DA 10 re""hllrse Lagulfees (cleoll ceo/BeH red/illei_'O-07-08.doc J:\AltomeyIJILLMIAGENDA STATEMENTS\Rqst for DA 10 reimburse Legal fees (ta~cZfBCM redlineLlO-07-08.doc