Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1993/10/12 MINIJTES OF A REGDLAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUIA VISTA Tuesday, October 12, 1993 Council Chambers 6:06 p.m. Public Services Building CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CAIL: PRESENT: Councilmembers Fox, Horton, and Mayor Pro Tem Rindone ABSENT: Councilmember Moore and Mayor Nader ALSO PRESENT: John D. Goss, City Manager; Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney; and Vicki C. Soderquist, Deputy City Clerk 2. PLEDGE OF ~AIJ.EGIANCE TO THE FLAG, SILENT PRAYER 3. APPROVAL OF MINL1TES: The following minutes from the Joint Meetings of the City Council and the San Diego County Board of Supervisors: September 27, 1993, July 30, 1992, September 24, 1992, September 30, 1992, November 4, 1992, and November 24, 1992. MSC (Fox/Horton) to approve the minutes of September 27, 1993 as presented. The minutes of July 30, 1992, September 24, 1992, September 30, 1992, November 4, 1992, and November 24, 1992 continued to the meeting of October 19, 1993. Approved 3-0-2 with Moore and Nader absent. 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: a. Tom Murphy, representing Elite Racing, updated Council on the activities for the Sth Annual krturo Barrios InvitationaL b. Ralph Tortes, representing the Cultural Arts Commission, stated October had been designated as Arts and Humanities Month. To celebrate, the Commission had invited a representative from Kellogg School of Performing and Visual Arts to speak to Council. Bonnie Johnston, representing Kellogg School, stated they studied one particular culture for the entire year. For the current year they had chosen the Aztecs and Mayans. She updated Council on the activities they would be working on for the year. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items pulled: 7 and 11) BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR O~ BY COUNCILMEMBER FOX, reading of the text was waived, passed and appruved 3-0-2 with Moore and Nader absent. 5. WRi I 1 ~ COMMUNICATIONS: a. Claims against the City. Claimant - R.K. Pierce Construction Company, Inc., Rodger K. Pierce, President, 4228 #A Acacia Avenue, Bonita, CA 91910. It is recommended that the Application for Leave to Present Late Claim be denied. Minutes October 12, 1993 Page 2 ) 6. ORDINANCE 2570 AMENDING SECTION 5.08.020 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE R RI ATING TO ADVERTISING MATERIALS ON TRANSIENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES (second readin~ and adol~tion) - Without regard to the constitutionality of advance prohibition of handbill distribution on hotel/motel property, the amendment creates a procedure by which a hotel/motel operator could call and terminate unwanted handbill distributions. It is recommended that until the impact of the procedure is known, no further or additional proscription be created. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. (City Attorney) 7. ORDINANCE 2571 AMENDING SECTION 8.23.230, SUBSECTION D (FUNDING AND RATES FOR COLLECT[ON), SUBPARAGRAPH 2, 'PATES FOR COI.LI~CrlON' OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE (second readin~ and adoption) - At the meeting of 9/21/93, Council requested that the City Attorney prepare an amendment to the Waste Management Franchise Ordinance that specifically reserves the authority of the Council to adopt on an expeditious basis a universal flat fee which could be imposed quickly and which would impose the same rate for all persons using the residential waste collection system regardless of whether or not they are actually using the yard waste recycling program. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. (City Attorney) Pulled from the Consent Calendar. · Joseph W. Garcia, 484 Fifth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA, stated he wanted to see a copy of the proposed ordinance. It was his understanding that the last time there was a fee increase for Laidlaw, it included yard waste. Under the tipping fee charges to Laidlaw, by the County, they paid less for yard waste that was already separated. It would be a good program for Laidlaw as the resident would be separating the yard waste. Therefore, it should be costing them less to process. Mayor Pro Tem Rindone stated it was a second reading of an ordinance to provide an option, should Council decide that a universal rate structure was preferable to the previous ordinance adopted for yard waste. It was not an additional fee or increase from what was previously adopted. If it was in the best interest of the community, and Council concurred they would then utilize the legal option that was granted to the franchisee. ORDINANCE 2571 OFFERED BY COUNCI~ER HORTON, reading of the text was waived, passed and approved 3-0-2 with Moore and Nader absent. 8. RESOLUTION 17270 ACCEPTING DONATION OF TRAVEL EXPENSES TO A'I'I'F_.N'D SOUTHWEST REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL DIALOGUE PROJECT OCTOBER 21 AND 22, 1993 - On 5/18/93, Council approved the donation of travel expense from SDG&E for a designee to attend the Southwest Regional Environmental Dialogue Project in Sedona, Arizona on June 14 and 15, 1993. We have now been requested to appoint a designee to attend the Southwest Regional Environmental Dialogue II, scheduled for October 21 and 22, 1993, also in Arizona. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Assistant City Manager Morris) 9. RESOLUTION 17271 AMENDING RESOLUTION 17245 AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A CERTIFICATION APPLICATION TO THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION - On 9/7/93, Council adopted Resolution 17245 authorizing submission of a certification application to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for regulation of cable television basic service rates. Section 3 of the resolution stated the City had no knowledge of any cable system in the City that was subject to effective competition. Since that time, staff has determined that Chula Vista Cable is subject to effective competition and, therefore, not subject to the rate regulation. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director -\ of Finance) Minutes October 12, 1993 Page 3 10.A. REPORT REGARDING CHOICE OF ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTY TAX LEVIS CKNOWN AS THE 'TEETER" PLAN) BY THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - For FY 1993/94, the County of San Diego is offering to each city in the County an option to join the "Teeter" plan which is an alternative method of distribution of property taxes and assessments whereby a city will be guaranteed to receive 100% of its share of the secured property tax levy. In exchange for this guarantee, all the penalty and interest revenue (which normally is allocated to the city) received from the payment of delinquent taxes will be retained by the County. Staff recommends Council accept the report and not approve the resolution. (Director of Finance) B. RESOLUTION 17272 AGR RRING TO ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND ASSE TO CHULA VISTA BY THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 11.A. REPORT REVIEW OF CLOSURE HOURS AND CURFEW AT RANCHO DEL REY AND INDEPENDENCE PARKS AND CIJRFEW AT CITY PARKS - The report examines the feasibility of modifying park hours in select parks that present public safety problems and increased enforcement at certain City parks. The recommendations come as a result of citizen concerns about public safety at Rancho del Rey and Independence Parks. Staff recommends Council accept the report and place the ordinance on first reading. (Director of Parks and Recreation) Pulled from the Consent Calendar. B. ORDINANCE 2572 AMENDING SECTION 2.66.270 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION ALrlHORITY TO ALTER PARK CLOSING HOL1RS (first reading) Pulled from the Consent Calendar. · Jon Buddingh, 1363 Santa Cruz Court, Chula Vista, CA, stated he had children that utilized the park. He supported the staff recommendation and felt the only legitimate use of the park at night was to transit from one area to another. They saw evidence of abuse in the park which they felt happened at night. The ordinance would only improve the use of the park and reduce maintenance. The posting of hours would enable the police to enforce the rules and escort people out of the park at night. · David R. Hand, 13333 Los Coches Court, Chula Vista, CA, stated he lived next to El Rancho Del Rey Park and recommended that Council not accept the staff recommendations. The objectives were good but the proposal would not solve the problems. He felt the problems were in spite of the park being there, not because the park was there. He felt the previous crimes occurred because it was a cul-de-sac, not a park. The only notification of the proposed regulations was the flyer for the Council meeting, he had been unaware that it had been heard by the Parks & Recreation Commission. The park had always been closed from 10:30 p.m. on and it had not stopped the problems. It had been years since he or his family had called the police regarding a problem because the police were so in demand they did not respond. There were no statistics in the study to indicate that a comparison had been made with other cul-de-sacs to see if it was a cul-de-sac or park problem. The only solution to the problem would be adequate funding for the police department. Councilmember Horton questioned whether Mr. Hand felt it was safe to jog through the unlit park at night. Mr. Hand responded there was a paved path and felt there should be more lighting. Councilmember Fox questioned staff as to the notice given regarding the meetings. Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreation, responded that notices were sent out to the residences around the park prior to the Council meeting. The notices asked for comments regarding the proposed ordinance and also let them know the date and time of the Council meeting. Notices were not sent out for the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. Staff did notify the concerned parties for that meeting. Minutes October 12, 1993 Page 4 Mayor Pro Tem Rindone questioned if the poficy had changed, when he was on the Parks and Recreation Commission public hearings were noticed. Mr. Valenzuela stated that to his knowledge the policy had not changed. If Council desired notice on changes for park rules that could be done. · Anthony Ciotti, 1338 Santa Cruz Court, Chula Vista, CA, stated he supported the staff recommendation. His was one of two homes that faced the park, playground equipment, and tennis courts. He felt drug dealing, drug use, and drinking were common occurrences at the park. Councilmember Fox stated he was concerned that the item was agendized on the Consent Calendar rather than Action Items. The ordinance would not solve all the problems but he expected it to give ammunition to the police to help the neighborhood. He had previously expressed concerns that citizens would be restricted from using the park but, after listening to the residents, it was apparent the park was not being used by the citizens after dark. He questioned whether early park closures had been used at other parks and the effect it had on enforcement. Mr. Valenzuela stated it had been done at Hilltop Park which seemed to be effective as it gave the police officers the "teeth" to go into the park and get people out at a certain time venus waiting until 10:30 p.m. Councilmember Fox stated he did not want the problem to get worse. Staff was working on an action plan that would deal with the hours of the parks. One alternative would be the use of a gate. Mr. Valenzuela responded that a gate would not be appropriate at the park because there were so many openings into the park. Mayor Pro Tern Rindone stated there was a difference with the E1 Rancho Del Rey Park. The other parks that had problems had limited or single access to the parks which made the use of a gate practical. It was the first time he recalled where there had been such activity in a park that had multiple access. He felt the most viable option was #3 regarding increased police patrols to enforce the park hours. Council needed to take action to provide security and also balance the right of the residents to use the park. He questioned the frequency of current police patrols and how it would change. Mr. Valenzuela responded that the park ranger went through the parks daily, if there were problems she would radio the police department for deployment of additional patrols to the area. The intent of #3 was that there would be close communication between the park ranger and the police department. A monthly meeting would also be held with the police department to discuss all parks throughout the system and any difficulties. The Police Chief had informed him that there were also increased patrols. Lt. Gaul, Chula Vista Police Department, stated there was a beat unit that operated in that area and all the parks. They checked the parks as often as possible. If there was a particular problem they would put on a special patrol in the area which would cause the beat officer to log how many times during each shift they were there, the activity they observed, and action taken. Councilmember Fox stated he did not see anything in the ordinance that would require increased police patrol and questioned if staff was assuring Council that it would occur. Mr. Valenzuela responded that was correct. Councilmember Rindone referred to the signage costs and felt that just because no new money was applied it should not be included. The fiscal impact statement should state what the costs were going to be which would give Council a better basis to make a decision. Minutes October 12, 199:3 Page S MSC (Rindone/Fox) to place Ordinance 2572 on first reading and approve the staff report and Option #3 - to dose Rancho Del Rey and Independence parks from 9:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. from the months of AprR through October and from 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. during the months of November through March. Staff is to give Council an annual report for the next two years on the increased activities and incidents within the parks. Approved 3-0-2 with Moore and Nader absent. Councilmember Rindone questioned when the signage would be in place. Mr. Valenzuela responded that it would be approximately six weeks. Councilmember Horton questioned when the increased ranger and police patrols would begin. Mr. Valenzuela responded that it would be immediately. * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 12. PUBLIC HEARING GPA-94-Ol/OCZ-94-A CITY-INITIATED PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN AND REZONE CERTAIN TERRITORY, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY PARK WAY, 'G' SI'RE~T, FIFTH AVENUE, AND BROADWAY, TO RESOLVE GF2qERAL PLAN/ZONING INCOIqSISTENCIEB WITHIN THE ~ CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY - The purpose of the ongoing consistency study is to resolve general plan/zoning inconsistencies within central Chula Vista. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on first reading and approve the resolution. (Director of Planning) A. ORDINANCE 2573 AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 19.18.010 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE iREZONING 9.7 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN PARK WAY, "G* Sl KEET, FIFTH AVENUE, AND BROADWAY (first reading) B. RESOLUTION 17273 APPROVING GPA-94-Ol: A CITY-INITIATED PROPOSAL AIVIENDING THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY PARK WAY, "G" STREET, FIFI'H AVENUE, AND BROADWAY, TO RESOLVE GENERAL PLAN/ZONING INCONSI~CIES WITHIN THE CENTRAL CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY Ken Lee, Assistant Planning Director, gave a brief history and overview of the project. The Resource Conservation Commission voted 5-0-2 to oppose the issuance of the Negative Declaration on the project based upon school concerns. Staff analysis indicated the school analysis would not be significant end rezoning would result in a maximum of twelve additional elementary school children and eleven junior high or high school students if the entire area was redeveloped. The Source Point Study was ready to proceed and staff would meet with school representatives. Staff felt the amount of construction that could be developed before the study was final would be very limited. The RCC also expressed concem over the amount of park acreage in western Chula Vista which had also been a concern of the Council. Staff was moving ahead with the Parks Implementation Program which would address some of those concerns. Staff felt there were three options available: 1) leave the General Plan as it was designated, at mid-density and fezone the properties at R-3-P-14 which would be consistent with the General Plan; 2) amend the General Plan to high-density and retain the R-3 zoning on the properties; and 3) the staff recommendation - to amend the General Plan to high-density for the B-4F area and medium-high for the B-4G area, and fezone the B-4G area to R-3-P-22. Councilmember Fox referred to the letter received from the Chula Vista Elementary School District requesting deferral of action until the Source Point Study was concluded. He questioned whether the School District had changed their position. Minutes October 12, 1993 Page 6 Robert Leiter, Director of Planning, responded that he had talked with Kate Shearson, Director of Planning for the School District, and she indicated that they would not be at the meeting to oppose the projects. Their preference would be to defer action. They felt with the Council moving forward on the Source Point Study they would have their concerns addressed. Councilmember Fox questioned how many other areas would be affected by the Source Point Study. He stated it was his understanding that the action on those areas would be deferred until the completion of the Study. Mr. Leiter responded that staff had recommended not moving forward on any further area in the zoning consistency area until the Study was completed. The property owner, in the present case, had requested that Council initiate the area due to specific concerns. After review, Council directed staff to process the area because it was small and would have minimal impacts. Councilmember Fox referred to Subarea B-4G and questioned whether it would result in fewer dwelling units on the lots. Mr. Lee stated Subarea B-4G was the area of change. The smaller lots, SO X 130, would not be affected whether the property remained R-3 or R-3-P-22. Councilmember Fox questioned whether the Elementary School District had changed their position regarding a deferral. Mr. Leiter responded they had not withdrawn their letter and their preference would be to defer action. They felt, given the fact Council was moving forward on the Source Point Study, they were comfortable that the issues would be resolved. Staff had also recommended conditions that would indicate that the properties not be treated any differently than any others as a result of the Source Point Study. Councilmember Horron questioned if one of the structures in Subarea B-4F was destroyed by fire if they would be able to replace it with the exact number of units with the zoning change. Mr. Lee stated Frank Herrera, Associate Planner, had indicated there was a clause which would allow them to replace at the previous density. It was his understanding that a law had been signed which addressed that question on a State-wide basis that would protect people. Councilmember Horton requested a copy of the legislation. She stated the actual net increase for Subarea B-4G would be thirty-nine units if the existing General Plan was taken into consideration. Mr. Lee stated he believed that was correct but he would have to go back through the numbers. Part of the confusion was that there were lots that indicated they were single family dwellings but had duplexes or other dwellings on them. Mr. Herrera stated Councilmember Horton was correct. Councilmember Fox questioned what property owners would be told if calling in for zoning in the two Subareas. Mr. Lee stated they would be told R-3. If there was an inconsistency between the General Plan and zoning, staff would make that clear. The limitations on the property would be the most restrictive. This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was declared open. Minutes October 12, 1993 Page 7 · Dan Roy Zendejas, 448 Smoky Circle, Chula Visa, CA, stated his parents owned a 13,000 sq. ft. lot at 536 Park Way and his uncle owned a 13,000 sq. ft. parcel on 580 Park Way and the adjoining property behind that. They had been waiting for five years and he requested that Council reevaluate his parents property as they were currently surrounded by high density projects. He questioned if the six units as recommended by staff were one bedroom, two bedrooms, etc. Before the plan was revised in 1988, they would have been able to build eight units/two bedrooms and now they were being told they could build six units. Mr. Lee stated the property in question was one of the parcels staff indicated was approximately 100 ft. X 130 ff. The development across the street was at a higher density and was built approximately twenty-five years ago, the project on the comer was a senior project and under a density bonus program, the project to the west was a condominium project of sixteen units, and immediately to the east the two parcels had three units each for a total of six. Under the proposed zoning they would be allowed a maximum of six units on the property. There was nothing to distinguish between the allowance of one, two, or three bedrooms under the R-3-P-22 zoning. Under the R-3 zoning, the City had a sliding scale. Mr. Zendejas questioned whether it would be different if they were adjoining lots due to parking configurations, landscaping, etc. and if there would be a bonus. Mr. Lee responded that under the current zoning they would be allowed a maximum of eight units. He was trying to give the Council a comparison to the east and west of what currently existed. Mr. Zendejas stated if they were allowed to build eight units, he would like some provision from the Council stating that he could build the eight units prior to action by Council regarding the zoning. Mr. Lee clarified that under the present General Plan designation of medium 6-11, that was the most restrictive so it would be limited to four units as the property was presently covered by the General Plan. The zoning, technically, allowed eight units. Staff was recommending, along with the Planning Commission, that the General Plan be amended to the medium-high density and rezone the property to R-3-P-22 which would allow six units maximum. There being no further public testimony, the public hearing was declared closed. Councilmember Fox stated that due to the Resource Conservation Commission vote and the letter from the Chula Vista Elementary School District he was not prepared to vote on the item. He questioned why the area was singled out when there were similar areas. He preferred to wait until the Source Point Study was completed. Mr. Lee stated it was his understanding that one of the property owners had requested that Council proceed with the area. Council then directed staff to proceed. Mayor Pro Tem Rindone stated staff indicated the School District was comfortable due to the commitment the City had made to the Source Point Study. It was at Council's request, in response to a constituent, to address the issue because of the minimal or insignificant impact. ORDINANCE 2.573 pLACRB ON FIRST READING AND RESOLUTION 17273 O~'~'M/ED BY MAYOR PRO TEM RINDONE, reading of the text was waived. Councilmember Hotton agreed that the short term effect would not be significant. Due to the economic climate she did not feel there would be a large number of permits approve& Mayor Pro Tem Rindone felt the area had been held hostage for a long time. There needed to be a balance of community needs. Minutes October 12, 1993 Page 8 ) City Manager Goss stated he was aware of the problems the schools were having with overcrowding in the I-5 corridor and that the next bank of schools were under capacity. He questioned whether the planning staff at the Elementary School District were doing any studies regarding the redrawing of school boundaries to create a better balance. Mr. Leiter stated that one of the outcomes of the Source Point Study, once long term growth projections for the western area were done, would be that the District would be doing some evaluation of attendance area boundaries and looking at ways to adjust their capacities west of 1-805. Any action on that property in the future, when Council took action as a result of the Source Point Study, would apply to the property even if a rezone occurred. The only effect would be on projects built between now and when the Source Point Study was completed and implemented. Staff did not feel that would be significant. Councilmember Fox stated after reviewing the information, the two subareas had been held hostage due to the inconsistencies between the General Plan and zoning. It was a tough issue for him to deal with and his initial concern was that it was the western part of the City. The zone did allow, in both areas, an R-3 type of zoning situation and action by Council that would make it consistent with both the General Plan and zoning. The property owners had an extra burden that others had not had and he felt that had to be weighed. The City was on track with the Study and he requested that as a condition for his support, he receive monthly update reports as to the progress of the Source Point Study. In light of the inconsistencies and extra burdens on the property owners, he would support the staff recommendation reluctantly. VOTE ON ORDINANCE 2573 AND RESOLUTION 17273: apprnved 3-0-2 with Moore and Nader absent_ 13. PUBLIC HEARING COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY SIRATEGY (CHAS) - The National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 requires all jurisdictions applying for funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to submit a CHAS. The CHAS is a planning document which identifies the city's housing needs and outlines a strategy to meet these needs. Staff recommends Council continue the public heating to the meeting of October 19, 1993. (Director of Community Development) This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was declared open. MSC (Rindone/Fox) to continue the public hearing to the meeting of 10/19/93. Approved 3-0-2 with Moore and Nader absent. ORAL COMIVIUNICATIONS · Joseph W. Garcia, 484 Fifth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA, stated he felt the Solid Waste Agreement was a very big issue with far reaching ramifications and should be agendized for public comments or be the topic of a town hall meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Rindone stated Council shared Mr, Garcia's comments regarding the seriousness and impacts upon the citizens of the community. The Council had been adamant about trying to obtain lower rates and a reduction of the tipping fee. Council would support whatever system proved to be the most cost effective. He felt the issue should be agendized at least monthly until there was a resolution to the problem. Councilmember Fox thanked Mr. Garcia for his input and felt the public energies should also be put where the decisions were made, i.e. the Interim Commission and County Board of Supervisors meetings. · Joelie Mohr, 580 "D" Street #E, Chula Vista, CA, expressed concern regarding the Chula Vista Police .,) Department not enforcing California Penal Code 273.6. She had been informed by the Police DeparUnent that they could not enforce her Court Ordered Divorce Decree restrictions regarding visitation rights of her Minutes October 12, 1993 Page 9 ex-husband. The Police Department informed her they only enforced restraining orders. If the Police Department had any other alternatives or suggestions she was willing to sit down with them to review those. Councilmember Fox stated that because the item was under Oral Communications Council could not take formal action. Mayor Pro Tem Kindone stated Council would have a member of staff advise Ms. Mohr what legal services could and could not be provided. If there was no satisfaction after that it could be brought back to Council. BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS None submitted. ACTION ITEMS None submitted. ITEMS ptH.l.Rl~ FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR Items pulled: 7 and 11. The minutes will reflect the published agenda order. OTHER BUSINESS 14. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S) - None 15. MAYOR'S REPORT(S) a. Ratification of Appointment: Brene Patrick - Economic Development Commission MSC (Fox/Rindone) to approve the ratification of appointment of Brene Patrick to the Economic Development Commission. Approved 3-0-2 with Moore and Nader absent. 16. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Fox: · Councilmember Fox stated he had been informed that the City had obtained $205,000 for three energy related environmental projects which was in addition to the $600,000 that was reported last week. He commended staff on their efforts. · Councilmember Fox questioned if it was staffs intent to bring the Gotham Street extension to Council on 10/19/93. City Manager Goss stated the item had been placed on the tentative agenda for the meeting of 10/19/93 as a report that would recommend that a hearing be set. Minutes October 12, 1993 Page 10 Mayor Pro Tem R. indone stated he hoped that it would be agendized for a date other than the 26th as it was his understanding it was a large agenda. Mayor Pro Tem Rindone: · Mayor Pro Tem Rindone stated he had artended a forum on drugs and gangs and the allegation had been made that the curfew law enforcement was not being utilized to its full extent and the police units were ignoring it and not implementing it. MSC {Rindone/Horton) to refer to staff for an update, in two to three weeks, as to how the curfew law was enforced, the implementation, and the numbers of people that were being picked up. Approved 3-02 with Moore and Nader absent. ADJOURNMENT The City Council met in a closed session at 8:00 p.m. to discuss: Instructions to negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 - Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA), Western Council of Engineers (WCE), Police Officers Association (POA), International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. Schaefer. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Igou vs. the City of Chula Vista. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. County of San Diego regarding tipping fee surcharge. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. Admiral Insurance ADJOURNMENT AT 8:58 P.M. to the Regular City Council Meeting on October 19, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. Respectfully submitted, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CMC, City Clerk by: Vic~ki C. Soderquist, DepUty Clerk