Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1993/08/17 RDA MINI~'F~ OF A JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ REDEVELOPBENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Tuesday, August 17, 1993 Council Chambers 10:54 p.m. Public Services Building CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Council/Agency Members Fox, Horton, Moore, Rindone, and Mayor/Chairman Nader. ALSO PRESENT: John D. Goss, City Manager/Director; Bruce M. Boogaard, City/Agency Attorney; and Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MSUC (FOX/RINDONE) to approve the July 27, 1993 minutes. CONSENT CAI.RNDAR None submitted. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES None submitted. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were none. ACTION ITEMS 3. COUNCIL/AGENCY REPORT FUTURE ROLE OF THE MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMI-YrF. E AND THE POSSIBLE MERGER OF THE MPC WITH THE SOUTHWEST PROJECT AREA COB/~II-I-I'P.;E PURSUANT TO CI-FL1LA VISTA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMF2CF COMMISSION (EDC} PERMIT STREAMLINING RECOMMENDATION NUMBER 17 - The Chula Vista EDC established a subcommittee to develop recommendations to streamline the City's development review process to create a more "user friendly" environment for business development. One of the recommendations (Number 17) concerned the future role and function of the Montgomery Planning Committee and the possible merger of the MPC with the Southwest Project Area Committee. Staff recommends the Council/Agency discuss the alternatives presented in the report and provide additional direction to staff. (Community Development Director/Planning Director) Continued from the meeting of 6/22/93. Council/Agency member Fox stated he campaigned for the annexation of Montgomery into the City of Chula Vista. He had also been elected to serve on the Montgomery Planning Commitlee when it did annex. He felt very strongly that Council should support permit stteamlining in the City. However, he did not feel that Council should be supporting streamlining in every situation. There were cases that called for leaving things Minutes August 17, 1993 Page 2 ) the way they were. He further stated that in the original position papers, no where was it stated that this Committee would sunset. It was implied that the Committee would remain. M (FOX) to approve Option 1 to retain the MPC as it was originally established. Motion died for lack of a second. Mayor/Chair Nader stated that Mr. Fox had addressed the Montgomery side of the issue. There was also the Southwestern Project Area Committee side of the issue. He felt that we had an opportunity to do some streamlining and consolidation without breaking faith with the voters of Montgomery who voted to annex to the City of Chula Vista. He supported the concept of community planning groups. He recommended No. 4 under Exhibit A. This would say that as soon as the three-year period, which State law requires for the existence of the Southwest PAC was over the Committee would be folded into the Montgomery Planning Committee. There would then be one combined Committee that would deal with the combined area of the Southwest PAC and the Montgomery Planning area. Council/Agency member Fox stated that after the PAC was terminated, you would have a Montgomery Planning Committee that could conceivably be composed of people who do not live in the area that was annexed into the City. He took the strict view that there was an implied promise to the people of Montgomery that they would have a community planning committee of their own. He felt that although this was a good alternative, it was not what was promised to the people of Montgomery; he was not prepared to water that down. Council/Agency member Moore recommended Option 2 to dissolve the MPC and ask that the existing SWPAC members vote to add the exiting MPC members to its committee. MS CrIORTON/RINDONE) to support Option 2 to dissolve the MPC and ask that the exiting SWPAC members vote to add the ~ting MPC members to its committee. The comnliRee would perfornl advisory functions to the Redevelopment Agency on Southwest projects only pursuant to Agency Resolution 1309. Mayor/Chair Nader felt that the Southwest Project Area Committee did not encompass the entire Montgomery area, there would be areas of the Montgomery community that would be without representation. Regardless of what the minutes reflect, there were representations made that there would be planning representation following annexation. He suggested that the Attorney look at whether the community was entitled to some say in the dissolution of a committee. SL1Bb'II'I'LITE MOTION: MS (NADER/FOX) to dissolve the Southwest Project Area Committee and merge it into one Southwest Comrmlnity Planning Committee at the end of the year. Substitute motion failed 2-3 (Horton, Moore, Rindone voting no). VOTE Oh/MAIN MOTION: Approved 3-2 (Fox, Islader voting no). Council/Agency member Moore stated he would like to see correspondence sent over the Mayor's signature to both Committees asking the three members to accept appointment or election to the Southwest Project Area Committee and asking Southwest to review with staff the legal process and use those three to fill the vacancies if we can do so within legal restrictions. Mayor/Chair Nader asked for staffs assistance in preparing a letter along those lines to assure that it complied with any legal restrictions. J Minutes August 17, 1993 Page 3 OTHER BUSINESS 4. CITY MANAGER'S/D1RECTOR'S REPORT(S): There were none. 5. MAYOR'S/CHAIRMAN'S REPORT(S): There were none. 6. COUNCIL/AGENCY MEMBER'S COMMENTS: There were none. Agency/City Attomey Boogaard requested that an urgency finding be made to go into closed session for the purpose of giving instructions to negotiators in regard to modifying the terms and conditions for the disposition of a development agreement on the auto park property. MSC 0NIADER/RINDONE) to make the urgency finding requested by the Agency/City Attorney. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Horton absent). ADJOURNMF2qT The meeting adjourned at 11:16 p.m. to the regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency on Tuesday, September 7, 1993 at 4:00 p.m., immediately following the City Council Meeting. Respectfully submitted, ~uthelLt, CMC City Clerk