HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1993/07/20 MINLrI'ES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CHUIA VISTA
Tuesday, July 20, 1993 Council Chambers
6:13 p.m. Public Services Building
CALL TO ORDER
1. ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Councilmembers Fox, Horton (left the meeting at 9:20 p.m.), Moore,
Rindone, and Mayor Nader
ALSO PRESENT: John D. Goss, City Manager; Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney; and Beverly
A. Authelet, City Clerk
2. PLEDGE OF AIJ.RGIANCE TO THE FLAG, SILENT PRAYER
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: None submitted.
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: None submitted.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items pulled: 15, 16, 17, and 18)
BALANCE OF CONSENT CAI.ENDAR OH'ERED BY COUNCILMEMBER RINDONE, reading if the text was
waived, passed and approved unanimously. Item 14 was removed from the agenda at the request of staff.
5. ~VI{I'I'I'EINI COIVIMUNICATIONS: None submitted.
6. ORDINANCE 2562 GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO LAIDLAW WASI~, SYSTEMS. INC. FOR
MULTI-FAMILYRECYCLING COIJ.RCTION SERVICES (second reading and adoption) - 0n6/22/93, Council
approved a resolution giving notice of intent to grant a franchise for the multi-family recycling program
collection services to be provided by Laidlaw Waste Systems. As directed, staff has noticed the public
hearing in conformance with the Charter required process for granting a franchise. Staff recommends
Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. (Administration)
7. ORDINANCE 2,561 REQUIRING RECOVERY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION FR~_q
IMPOSED BY SAN DIEGO COUNTY (first reading) - Commencing 7/1/92, under the auspices of a new State
law, the County has imposed a booking fee of $176 per criminal defendant arrested by our police
department. While we are protesting the amount of the fee and the authority to impose same in pending
litigation, adoption of the ordinance would create a means of collecting it from criminal defendants booked
through the system during the pendency of the litigation if it eventually proves unsuccessful, and would
therefore protect our general fund from a possible large unaccrued liability. Staff recommends Counc~ place
the ordinance on first reading and approve the resolution. (City Attorney) Continued from the meeting of
7/13/93.
RESOLLrHON 17167 APPROPRIATING AN ADDITIONAL $3,855 FOR THE CONTINUATION OF
THE BOOKING FEES LITIGATION - 4/5th's vote required.
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 2
8. ORDINANCE 2563 AMENDING SCHEDULE X, SECTION10.48.0SO OF THE MUNICIpAL CODE,
DECREASING STATE LAW MAXIMUM SPEED LIMITS IN CERTAIN AREAS, EAb~ ~F STREET EAST OF
EASTLAKE DRIVE, MODNT MIGDEL ROAD AND PROCTOR VAI.I.EY ROAD (first reading) - East "H" Street,
east of EastLake, is a four lane major arterial. Mount Miguel Road and Proctor Valley Road are each Class
II collector streets. Since the streets do not have any ffonting business or residences, the unposted prima
facia speed limit is 55 mph. Based on recent traffic surveys, including speed surveys and a study of roadway
geometrics, and in the interest of public safety, it is recommended that East "H" Street, east of EastLake Drive
be posted at 45 mph, Mount Miguel Road be posted at 35 mph, and Proctor Valley Road be posted at 30
mph. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on first reading. (Director of Public Works)
9. RESOLUTION 17156 APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF THE AGREEMENT WITH REMY AND
THOMAS FOR LEGAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE OTAY RANCH PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT - The agreement extension will provide continuing assistance in
reviewing the Otay Ranch EIR including the CEQA Findings, Statement of Overriding Consideration,
Mitigation Monitoring Program, and the staff report. Also, will provide continuation of meetings with staff
and coordination with Board of Supervisors/City Council on legal issues. Staff recommends approval of the
resolution. (Deputy City Manager Krempl) Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93.
10. RESOLUTION 17168 SUPPORTING ORGANIC RECYCLING WEST'S GREEN MATERIALS
COMPOSTING FACILITY AS REQUIRED FOR THE 'GAP' PROCEDURES FOR INCLUSION IN THE COUNTY
OF SAN DIEGO SOLID WAS-rE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1986
REVISED SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN TO INCLUDE THE
PROPOSED COMPOSTING FACILITY - Organic Recycling West, Inc. (ORI) is a company specializing in the
design and operations of municipal cornposting facilities. ORI is in the process of establishing a green
materials (yard waste) composting facility in the Otay Mesa area of the City of San Diego. Pursuant to
Section 50000 of the Public Resources Code, and as required by State law (the "Gap ProcedureD all new
solid waste facilities (materials recovery, cornposting and landfill) must be included in the County Solid
Waste Management Plan (CoSWMP). The report describes the proposed composting facility. Support of the
proposed project does not require that Chula Vista commit its green materials to the facility. However,
should the facility open, it will provide the City with a viable alternative for processing of its yard waste
materials. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Administration)
11. RESOLUTION 17169 AUTHORIZING CONDITIONAL TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF RANCHO DEL
REY PARKWAY ON SEErEMBER 18 AND 19, 1993, FOR THE ORANGE CRATE DERBY - The Bonita Orange
Crate Derby Committee is requesting the City to authorize a temporary street closure and to grant permission
to conduct an Orange Crate Derby on Rancho del Rey Parkway on Saturday and Sunday, 9/18/93 and
9/19/93. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Parks and Recreation)
12. RESOLUTION 17170 INTENTION TO VACATE UNNAMED ROADS LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PALOMAR STRF~T AND INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD (PALOMAR TROLLEY
CENTER} - Sunbelt Management Company, c/o Latigo West Development Company, owner of the proposed
development of properties in the southeast comer of Palomar Street and Industrial Boulevard, has requested
fight-of-way vacations of unnamed roads by the City in order to utilize the vacated land for the Palomar
Trolley Center development. ITEM HAS BEEN pUI.I.I~D AT STAFFS REOUEST. (Director of Public Works
and Director of Community Development)
13.A. RESOLUTION 17171 APPROVINGREPLACEMENTSUBDMSIONIMPROVEMENTAGI~EEMENTS
FOR FOURTEEN SUBDIVISIONS IN RANCHO DEL REY SPAS I AND II AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE gAME * Rancho del Rey Parmership has notified the City that the fee interest in fourteen
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 3
subdivisions located at Rancho del Rey SPAs I and II is to be conveyed to Rancho del Rey Investors, L.P.
They have also requested replacement of the original subdivision improvement agreements with new
agreements signed by the new owner. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions. (Director of Public
Works)
B. RESOLUTION 17172 APPROVING THE FIRST AIVIENDIVIENT/NOVATION OF ~
SUPPLEMFAWfAL SUBDM SION IMPRO~ AG]~F-F-MENTS FOR SPA I, PHASE 5, UNIT 1, LOT 77 AND
FOR RANClIO DEL REY SPA II AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAME
C. RESOLUTION 17173 APPROVINGLEI'IP~C_OFESCROWINSTRUCTIONSFORTHEI~RI-RASEOF
SUBDM SION IMPROVEMFAVF AGREEMENTS, SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT
AGI~F-F-MFA'qTS AND BONDS FOR SUBDIVISIONS IN RANClIO DEL REY SPAS I AND II IN CONNECTION
WITH THE TRANSFER OF FEE TITLE FROM RANClIO DEL REY PARTNERSHIP TO RANClIO DEL REY
INVESTORS, L.P. {E. SCROW NUMBER 1073167J FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY) AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO SIGN SAID LEI lhq.
14. RESOLLrHON 17174 APPROVINGTHIRDAMENDMENTTOAGBRRMENTWITHDARI~-IJ-AND
ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PREPARE TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLANS FOR 1-805 AND OTAY VAIJ.RY ROAD
INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - Staff recently received notification from Caltrans that their Office of
Project Planning and Development in Sacramento is requiring further changes in the City's traffic signal
design plans for the signalization of the 1-805 ramps at Otay Valley Road. Specifically, Caltrans has
determined that the width of the shoulder sections on Otay Valley Road under 1-805 is substandard as
proposed at five feet and must be eight feet. The civil design work needed to modify the traffic signal plans
to meet Caltrans requirements will add an additional $16,600 to the City's design cost to complete the
project. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
Removed from the agenda at staff request.
15. REPORT PROPOSED DEBT SE'IqliMENT BETWEEN OGDEN ENVIROlXRvIENTAL AND
ENERGY SERVICES AND BALDWIN VISTA ASSOCIATES REGARDING THE OTAY RANCH - Over the past
few months, Baldwin has fallen short in meeting its contractual obligation to Ogden Environmental as to
payments due. Negotiations have been ongoing over the last thirty days to arrive at an acceptable payment
schedule to eliminate the debt. A tentative agreement has been reached. The purpose of the report is to
request Council authorization, since the City is a party to the three party agreement, to have City staff
implement the agreement. It is recommended that Council authorize staff to execute a payment agreement
with Baldwin Vista and Ogden Environmental to address the Otay Ranch debt. (Deputy City Manager
Krempl) Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93. Pulled from the Consent Calendar.
· Nancy Bizzarri, 416 Third Avenue #10, Chula Vista, CA, was not present when called.
MS (Moore/Rindone) to accept the staff report and staff recommendation.
Mayor Nader questioned whether there was liability involved for the City.
City Attorney Boogaard responded there was a small amount of liability that the City would be responsible
for making sure there was good title and that the City would properly foreclose on the note to the benefit
of Ogden. Those costs would all be paid out of the security of the property. There was a risk of property
devaluation which he felt there was ample value to loan ratio that the City would be secured. The normal
process would be that the City would receive the note, title insurance, and soils reports before the deal was
closed.
VOTE ON MOTION: approved 4-0-1 with Hotton absent
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 4
16. REPORT WORK PROGRAM AND AU'I~ORIZATION FOR A SCHOOL IMPACT
MITIGATION STUDY [N CONJUNCTION WITH THE CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
SWEETWATER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT AND SOURCE POINT- In mid-1992, Council directed staff
to ~nalize a work program for the mentioned study with both School Districts and retum with a final work
program for Council action. Staff has since worked with the Districts and Source Point to reach consensus
on the final program, which is being presented for Council consideration. Staff recommends Council: (1)
accept the work program and authorize commencement of the Source Point study; and (2) authorize staff
to undertake final coordination activities, and the City Manager to execute a contract as necessary to initiate
the Source Point work. (Director of Planning) Pulled from the Consent Calendar.
17. REPORT OTAY CORPORATE CENTER NORTH PRO3ECT - On 3/23/93, Council
authorized staff to transmit a letter stating the City's concerns regarding a proposed development project in
Otay Mesa known as "Otay Corporate Center North." Subsequently, staff received a copy of the City
Manager's Report, which recommended a six-month continuance of the project, due to transborder airport
issues. The report is intended to provide Council with an update. It is recommended that Council accept
the report and provide staff with additional comments and/or direction, if deemed necessary, prior to the
scheduled San Diego City Council hearing for the project on 7/27/93. (Director of Planning) Pulled from
the Consent Calendar.
18. REPORT CONSULTANT SRI.ECTION PROCESS FOR GREG ROGERS PARK
IMPROVEMENT PLAN - On 3/2/93, Council directed staff to return with a report which would address
Counc~'s concern on the Request For Proposal (RFP) process used to select a design consultant for the Greg
Rogers Park Improvement Project. Staff recommends Council accept the report. (Director of Parks and
Recreation) Pulled from the Consent Calendar.
Continued to the meeting of 7/27/93.
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
19. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF AN INCRFASE IN SEWER SERVICE CHARGES - As
a member of the San Diego Area Wastewater Management District (SDAWMD), the City is required to
participate in its operations, maintenance, and upgrade program. Due to the increased cost of upgrading
regional wastewater transportation, treatment, and disposal, it is necessary to raise the sewer service charges
for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 4/Sth's
vote required. Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93.
RESOLUTION 17164 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE MA:slP~ FEE SCHEDULE ON
SEWER SERVICE CHARGES AND TRANSFER OF $1,856,000 FROM FUND lll TO FUND 225
Councilmember Horton questioned whether the Federal Government was going to reimburse the Metro
System for treatment of Tijuana sewage.
John Lippitt, Director of Public Works, responded they were going to pay approximately $236,000 that was
in the budget but he was not certain whether it had been approved. It was staffs position that if it was
money the City did not have to pay this year, it was money that would not have to be raised in the future.
Mayor Nader stated he had to correct the answer on one point, i.e. the district that Chula Vista was in had
not been billed for, or was paying, the Tijuana sewage cost. That had been paid by the City of San Diego.
The City of San Diego requested that the Waste Water Management District Board approve an assessment
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page S
for "fair share" costs. The Board declined to do that and therefore it was not being spread among the
member agencies.
Councilmember Rindone requested that staff present baseline data in the reports to Council, i.e. current
rates, etc. He questioned the amount of monies in the reserve accounts.
Mr. Lippitt responded that the estimate for Fund 225 would be $7.2 million by the end of next year. In
Fund 222 it was estimated there was $8 million. Of the $8 million, approximately 60-70% could go toward
the Point Loma expansion and reclamation projects.
Councilmember Rindone questioned whether there were specific restrictions or regulations that allowed
investments, bonding, etc.
Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance, responded that all idle funds within the City were put in a pool and
invested. Interest earnings were then allocated each month back into the individual accounts. Most
investments were short term; shorter than one year, some were 3-5 years. Staff reviewed the investments
constantly to see what the interest rates were in accordance with the terms of the investment. The City was
pretty much limited to a five year term as a maximum. Investments were also based on the City's cash flow
needs.
Mayor Nader referred to the comment made that in the event it was necessary, the rate increases would help
the City finance the construction of the Otay Valley water reclamation plant and questioned whether that
was a correct statement. He questioned whether staff was justifying the proposed increase due to the
potential need to construct the reclamation facility.
Mr. Lippitt responded that the comment was in connection with Fund 222, the developer's collection fees.
That was not the justification for the proposed increase.
Councilmember Rindone referred to Table 3, regarding rate comparisons, and felt staff should also include
an evaluation of the reserves for the eleven jurisdictions. He questioned whether the City was in the top
two or three jurisdictions regarding amount of reserves.
Mr. Lippitt responded that he felt Councilmember Rindone was correct.
City Manager Goss stated that had been done by design. Staff had done an analysis several years ago which
showed that by following a conservative increase in rates and having reserves the City would hopefully be
able to avoid any major "hit" which would make the rates skyrocket.
Councilmember Rindone stated that action by staff and previous Councils was the reason the City was where
it was. He supported the City's effort to be sure the ratepayers did not take a big Mhif but felt due to the
amount of reserves, Council needed to be sensitive to the ratepayers during hard economic times.
Mr. Lippitt responded that the City would be charged the "fair share' amount for the extension of the ouffall
and the paralleling of the existing portion. There would probably be over $500 million in improvements
to Point Loma to move the sludge and extend the outfall. Each $200 million was approximately
$1.00/month to every rate payeL
Councilmember Fox felt the following information was missing from the reports: current rates, utilizing
months, etc.
This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was declared open.
· Joseph Garcia, 484 Fifth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA, stated if the anticipated revenues exceeded what
was needed for the sewer maintenance, it should be classified as a tax and not a fee. It should be up to the
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 6
people as to whether they wanted to accept the tax. He also felt the rates for low-income households should
be lower.
· Carolyn Butler, 97 Bishop Street, Chula Vista, CA, questioned whether the sewer fund paid for the
repairs between Qunitard/Third Avenue and Orange.
Mr. Lippitt responded that the sewer service funds were not used for funding those repairs.
There being no further public testimony, the public hearing was declared closed.
Mayor Nader felt it was premature to build reserves on assumptions he did not share, i.e. that the City would
pay a 'fair share' of their costs for the Clean Water Program. He felt the cost projections were highly
speculative and it was not known what the final shape of the mandated sewage upgrade program would be.
Until that was known, no one knew what should be charged to the public to build up reserves necessary to
pay for. There were several issues outstanding on the Wastewater Management Board, apportionment of
costs, apportionment of liability, and method of paying for expansion capacity. Another reason the City's
participation was in question was because recen~y the City of San Diego had voted to reject the Board's
request to support revisions in the weighted voting formula. The City's consultants had indicated that
depending on how the Wastewater Management District resolved the issues, there could be less expensive
alternatives for the City to pursue which could include construction of the Otay Reclamation Plant with other
entities. Unless it was known that the City needed the money to provide sewage service, he had difficulty
in supporting an increase. He had been contacted by many homeowners and business people that were
concerned regarding increases that had already been passed as well as the proposed increase. Until he was
really convinced those were costs the City would have to incur, he felt it would be better to hold rates down
rather than "beef up~ the reserves now. He questioned how much the rates had gone up over the past years.
Mr. Lippitt responded they went up approximately $3/month last year.
City Manager Goss stated the rates went up approximately $1/month the year before. If the rate was not
increased the rates may have to be increased even more in the future. He noted that the rates in many of
the other jurisdictions were advancing faster than Chula Vista.
Councilmember Rindone suggested that when the rates were brought back to Council in one year for review
staff include the sewer service rate for single family dwellings, additional information on the reserves, and
the ranking of each public agency as well. Council needed to be judicious and provide restraint.
MS (Fox/Nader) to not approve the proposed sewer rate increase.
Councilmember Moore stated regardless of what the Council did, it would not be cheap and there would
be a risk involved. It was easier to build up a reserve and pay small money up front and drawing interest
than to pay a bond and extensive interest. He felt staff was on the right path. Water, sewage, trash, and
health were not cheap and there would be very little subsidy in the future.
VOTE ON MOTION: approved 4-1 with Moore opposed.
MS (Rindone/Moore) direct staff to provide for next year's review of the sewer rates the information as
provided in the current report. analysis of the reserves of all the agencies, and analysis of the impacts of
future rates.
Mayor Nader suggested the information include an analysis of potential alternative scenarios, i.e. the San
Diego Clean Water Program, different technologies, proposed amendments to the Clean Water Act, use of
conicact with San Diego to look at the Civfs liability and hold them to theirs, etc.
Minutes
July 20,1993
Page 7
Councilmember Moore felt the analysis for the reserves needed to have counter balance because smaller
cities had smaller reserves due to lower flow.
Councilmember Rindone stated Councilmember Moore was correct and the charge was to provide a rationale
so it was comparable, not just the size of the reserves but the relationship.
VOTE ON MOTION: approved unanimously.
20. PUBLIC HEARING CITY OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR
1993/94 - Based upon the advice of the City Attorney, the public hearing for Open Space Maintenance
District 10 has been separated due to conflict of interest. In accordance with the City Municipal Code
Section 17.07, the City Engineer prepared reports on the spread of assessments for the Open Space Districts.
The reports were accepted, and the required public hearings were set by Council at their meetings of
5/25/93 and 6/1/93. The first public hearing was held on 7/13/93. Staff recommends approval of the
resolution. (Director of Public Works)
RESOLUTION 17175 ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAI~ANCE FACILITIES TO
BE MAINTAINED AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 FOR OPEN SPACE DIb'I'K[CT
hFLIMBER 10
Councilmember Fox stated he had a conflict of interest due to the ownership of property in the area and left
the dias.
This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was declared open.
· Porfirio Campos, 1778 Hampton Court, Bonita, CA, questioned how much money the City intended
to raise and what the allocation of the funds would be. He stated a study had not been conducted to
determine how much would be required to maintain the open spaces.
John Lippitt, Director of Public Works, informed Council that Mr. Campos was speaking before the wrong
hearing, his home was located in District 14.
Mayor Nader stated he would incorporate Mr. Campos' comments into the public testimony for Item 21.
· Nancy Bizzarri, 416 Third Avenue #10, Chula Vista, CA, was not present when called.
· Roberto Terrado, 1075 South View Circle #10, Chula Vista, CA, protested the 100% increase in his
assessment.
There being no further public testimony, the public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION 17175 OFFERED BY MAYOR NADEK, reading of the text was waived, passed and approved
4-0-0-1 with Fox abstaining.
21. PUBLIC HEARING CITY OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBERS 1-9, 11, 14, 15,
17, 18, 20, 24, 26, AND BAY BOULEVARD, EASTLAKE AND TOWN CF3q'FFA~ MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 - Based upon the advice of the City Attorney, the public hearing for Open Space
Maintenance District 10 has been separated due to conflict of interest. In accordance with the City
Municipal Code Section 17.07, the City Engineer prepared reports on the spread of assessments for the Open
Space Districts. The reports were accepted, and the required public hearings were set by Council at their
meetings of 5/25/93 and 6/1/93. The first public hearing was held on 7/13/93. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 8
RESOLUTION 17176 ORDER/BIG CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO
BE MAINTAINED, APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND LEVYING THE
ASSESSIVIEgl'S FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NUMBERS 1-9, 11, 14, 1S, 17, 18,
20, 24, 26 AND BAY BOULEVARD, EASTlAKE AND TOWN CENTER MAINTENANCE DIslKICTS
John Lippitt, Director of Public Works, informed Council that the current assessment in District 14 was
$323/year and the notice had been for $319.94/year. Their new assessment had gone down 32% to
$254.74.
This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was declared open.
Mayor Nader stated Mr. Campos' comments would be incorporated into the public hearing.
· Lloyd Heiydt, 660 East "d" Street, Chula Vista, CA, Open Space District 5, felt the 1% cut was
tokenism. He was concemed regarding the progressive and continuous increase in the factors making up
the total budget, i,e. employee services. Relative to the services being provided he felt it was excessive. The
sentices that were done, relative to the amount of administrative coordinating, was way out of line. He
requested Council look at the items in the budget regarding administrative costs. Nothing positive was being
done in their district and no negative situations were being corrected.
Councilmember Moore questioned whether Mr. Heiydt had artended the open space district meetings held
in the spring. The meetings were established so owners could express their concerns and desires. He felt
there may need to be better follow-up of those meetings.
Mr. Heiydt responded that he had in the past but not the last one held as he felt it was an exercise in
futility.
Mayor Nader requested that staff invest/gate Mr. Heiydt concerns regarding debris, etc. in the district.
· Nancy Bizzarri, 416 Third Avenue #10, Chula Vista, CA, was not present when called.
There being no further public testimony, the public hearing was declared closed.
Councilmember Rindone requested that staff make a chart of the boundaries of the open space districts and
include it with the staff report for next years review by Council.
Mayor Nader felt the staff report should be more complete and include district by district reasons for
proposed actions and public input on each. He also suggested that the past years budget be included in the
report in the future. He felt it appropriate to refer the proposed assessment to the Town Centre Project Area
Committee and ffso recommended have the issue brought back to Council for reconsideration. If there were
planning area committees in other areas it would be appropriate to submit the budgets on the open space
districts for their input. He was concerned over what was being provided over what was being charged but
did not have the type of specific information in front of him that would enable him to offer specific changes.
If approval was needed to go forward with the maintenance contracts then maybe Council should approve
them with the understanding that they could be subject to reconsideration based on further consideration
being developed. He questioned whether the City would be entering into any binding contracts for a
specified term based on the Council's action that would preclude a reevaluation.
Mr. Lippitt stated the assessments were on the tax rolls and filed would be there for one year. It could be
revisited next year. Most of the contracts had been awarded for next year.
Jerry Foncerada, Parks Superintendent, stated the contracts had been approved by Council on 6/30/93.
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 9
Mayor Nader questioned whether Council had been informed that the contracts were anticipating assessment
increases Council had not voted on.
Mr. Lippitt stated the Engineer's Report went to Council in early June which had the preliminary
assessments.
Councilmember Moore felt scheduling was the key. The first step should be the public meetings for the
property owners in the various districts, with a report to the Council regarding the comments and concerns
addressed at the meeting. Council should address the proposed assessment increases prior to approval of
the contracts.
Mr. Foncerada stated the assessment hearings were held prior to the awarding of the contracts in the past
but the problem was that the City did not know what the carry-over would be from the existing years
operating budget until the budget was closed. If the report was prepared in April there would be a three
month period there would not be an accurate picture of what the reserves would be and therefore there
would be a higher assessment.
Mayor Nader suggested that the contracts and rate hearing be held concurrently because information in the
contracts had a real bearing on what the assessments were.
RESOLUTION 17176 O~'I~'ERED BY COUNCILMEMBER FOX, reading of the text was waived, passed and
approved unanimously.
MS (Moore4tNader) suggested schedule: 1) meeting with the property owners of the districts, late winter or
early spring; 2) written report to Council (not A113) of concerns regarding specific open space distrim and
what could or could not be done; 3) proposed assessments presented to Counc~; 4) conwacts presented to
Counc~; and 5) assessments forwarded to the assessor.
Mr. Lippitt felt the assessments needed to be done before or at the same meeting as the contracts.
Therefore, the assessment hearings would probably have to be held in June because the contracts started
in July.
VOTE ON MOTION: approved unanimously.
MSUC (Nader/Fox) to refer the Town Centre assessment to the Town Cenh-e Project Area Committee for
comment.
22. PUBLIC HEARING AMENDING THE CI1YS 1992/93 HOME PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - South
Bay Community Services is requesting $617,646 of HOME Federal Housing Funds from the City for
Acquisition and Rehabilitation of a 14 unit apartment building at 31 Fourth Avenue which they plan to
develop into a short-term housing facility to serve homeless families in the South Bay. Staff recommends
the puMic hearing be continued to 8/10/93. (Director of Community Development)
Councilmember Rindone stated he would abstain from participation due to a potential conflict of interest
and left the dias.
MS t'Nader/Moore) to continue the public hearing to the meeting of 8/10/93.
Councilmember Fox requested clarification on the requirement for 4/5th's vote.
Chris Salomone, Director of Community Development, stated it was staffs determination that it did require
a 4/Sth's vote under the City Charter.
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 10
Mayor Nader requested that the City Attorney look at that requirement prior to the 8/10/93 meeting as he
had been informed it did not require 4/5th's vote.
VOTE ON MOTION: approved 4-O-0-1 with Rindone abstaining.
23. PUBLIC HF..ARING REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE GROWTH MANAGEIVlENT
OVERSIGHT COMMISSION'S (GMOC) 1992 ANNUAL REPORT - Pursuant to requirements of the City's
growth management program, the annual report reflects the outcome of analysis of information presented
by various City departments and external agencies regarding the impacts of growth on each of the eleven
facility and service topics covered by the Threshold Standards. The report serves to identify whether or not
the City is in compliance with each of the standards and to make related recommendations to Council on
any actions believed necessary to remedy identified deficiencies and/or ensure continuing compliance. It
is recommended that Council accept the 1992 Annual Report and direct staff to undertake actions necessary
to implement the Report's recommendations; and (2) direct staff to prepare the necessary Statements of
Concern for issuance by the Mayor regarding the Water, Schools, and Air Quality Thresholds. (Director of
Planning)
· Will Hyde, Chair of the Growth Management Oversight Commission, informed Council that Elizabeth
Allen was also present from the Commission. He gave a brief review the history of the GMOC and felt it was
now well established and well run.
Councilmember Fox stated Council had been told that eastern development was not responsible for the
development problems in the City and the report implied the opposite. He questioned whether the GMOC
discussed what responsibilities, if any, development east had regarding the problem.
Mr. Hyde responded the drainage problem had been discussed thoroughly and staff was asked if some of
the problems in the areas west of 1-805 were attributable, in part or in whole, to the development east of
1-805. Staff informed the GMOC that the answer was "no". Therefore, the Committee indicated that they
had been advised that the drainage problem was not in and of itself caused by development east of 1-805
but they were sufficiently concerned and would revisit the issue next year.
Councilmember Fox requested that if the Commission felt the same next year, he would like an analysis of
why they came to that conclusion and make recommendations to Council. The GMOC had recommended
monitoring of several items and he questioned whether the Commission was recommending that the reports
be submitted to Council.
Mr. Hyde stated the interim reports for performance standards for Priority 1 calls should be given to
Council. The Commission felt they were on the edge and that it would be appropriate to monitor.
Councilmember Fox questioned if Council adopted the GMOC recommendations if staff would be going forth
with the Green Belt Master Plan or Council was approving it in concept.
Mr. Hyde stated they felt the Park and Recreation Threshold should be revised so there would not be two
standards of requirements for park space. One of the reasons Council had not acted on that in the past was
because a Park Implementation Plan had not been completed. The GMOC felt the Park Implementation Plan
should be completed as soon as possible. They also recommended that as part of the Park Implementation
Plan there be reference to the fact that there should be a Green Belt Master Plan. The General Plan stated
there "shall be developed a Green Belt Master Plan" and it had never been done.
Mayor Nader stated the City had failed to meet the Police Threshold, marginally, for the second year in a
row and questioned whether it was Mr. Hyde's opinion that given trends and additions to the police force
in the current fiscal year budget that the issue would be adequately addressed.
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 11
Mr. Hyde responded that in speaking for himself, he felt they were moving in the right direction. He was
not qualified to say whether what was being proposed was adequate. The GMOC suggested the Police
Department make an effort to evaluate the Threshold Standard. They were not convinced that response
performance alone was the only and best way of evaluating the growth impacts upon police service.
Mayor Nader stated the report indicated that the threshold issues regarding police were not necessarily
related to growth but felt it clear that an additional increment of growth would add to the need for police
services.
Mr. Hyde agreed, they felt the standard was decent but were not sure it was the best standard for evaluation.
Mayor Nader stated his concern was that they were stressing an analysis of what impacts growth up to the
present had already caused. What he was interested in as a growth manager, was what impacts would be
caused by the next increment of growth. If the City found itself in a situation where the Police Threshold
was not being met, even if the cause was not growth, but more growth would aggravate it, the City needed
to enforce the growth management ordinance which called for a moratorium under those conditions.
Mr. Hyde responded that it would be a very tough call to prove that growth, in and of itself, was causing
the police performance standard to diminish to the point Council would stop, slow, or reduce growth.
Mayor Nader felt the issue was not whether growth had already caused that decline in the standard but
whether additional growth would aggravate that decline. He had been informed that an increasing number
of Priority 2 calls were "killed by communications". He questioned whether that was an issue reviewed by
the Commission.
Mr. Hyde responded no.
Mayor Nader suggested the GMOC invite the POA to send a representative when Police Thresholds were
considered. He questioned whether the report was approved by the Commission unanimously.
Mr. Hyde responded that was correct. The Montgomery Planning Committee had not been able to take
action on the report due to a lack of quorum. The Planning Commission approved the report 6-1 with a
two-part motion: 1) approved the report; and 2) the Council be requested to expedite the processing of the
Park Improvement Plan and development of a Green Belt Master Plan.
Mayor Nader stated he had concern with the tone of the Letters of Concern in the past and felt they should
be drafted in a friendly manner. The letters should include the recommendations of the GMOC indicating
the City's willingness to "step to the plate" in support of the agencies fulfilling their missions. Regarding
the Park Implementation Plan, he felt the City needed a series of actions rather than a plan. A higher
priority should be given to the development of Otay Valley Regional Park and to monitor development
proposals that potentially impacted the Green Belt.
Mr. Hyde felt it needed to move from concept to something that had some degree of definition. Then the
property owners would have an idea of what lands the City felt should be protected.
Mayor Nader hoped that in presenting and developing reports to Council on discretionary land use decisions
the comments Mr. Hyde made would be automatically incorporated into staff recommendations. It was part
of the General Plan to have a Green Belt and the City should be following that in good faith.
Councilmember Rindone referred to the recommendation of "assisting the school district..." and requested
further clarification.
Mr. Hyde responded that the nature of what could be done was cooperation to make it easier for schools
to work within the flamework they had in land use planning.
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 12
Councilmember Rindone referred to the recommendation regarding a new standard for alternative fuels and
encouraged staff m focus on that recommendation. He was pleased to hear that growth may not be the best
measure in ascertaining the impacts on the police department. It might be the best measure, however, it
might not be the only measure.
Councilmember Horton stated she would have to leave the meeting but requested that Item 18 be continued
to the 7/27/93 meeting and that Councilmember Rindone give Council and the public the presentation he
made a the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce regarding the Waste Participation Agreement.
MSUC (Nade~/Rindone) to continue Item 18 to the meeting of 7/27/93.
Councilmember Hotton left the meeting at 9:20 p.m.
This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was declared open. There being no public
testimony, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Moore stated there were fifo/items recommended for action in the report. He questioned
whether there were other developments to the east, other than Telegraph Canyon, that adversely impacted
the City.
John Lippitt, Director of Community Development, responded that Telegraph Canyon was the major one that
would impact the west. The areas south were not developed yet.
Councilmember Moore stated that most of the flooding, if subtracting Telegraph Creek, was caused by the
fact that Chula Vista drainage was usually a dip in the road. In reviewing the minutes from the GMOC
report last year, the following recommendations were approved: 1) bring back to Council a formula for a
weighted factor as to acreage for gymnasiums, pools, community centers, etc. If Council was waiting for
a master plan, he felt that should come before a master plan and the data then be used in the master plan.
2) Evaluate park expansion potential south of Main Street, during budget review, as a means of addressing
park needs. He did not remember that being a supplemental during the budget process. 3) Bring back
report on potential and logistics for a joint use agreement with the school district for use of these facilities.
He felt that should be done well before, and utilized in, the master plan. The City could become a full
parmer with the schools by sharing facilities and helping to pay the operation and maintenance (O & M).
4) Review zoning, etc. and report where park acreage could be sited west of 1-805, list present usage and
purchase cost. 5) City Manager bring back a report during budget review regarding short range measures
to address East "H" Street, west of Hilltop, other than widening the street to mitigate traffic. Those items
were now one year old and he had not seen any results.
Mayor Nader requested the City Manager, next week, advise Council when those items outlined by
Councilmember Moore would be presented to staff.
MSC (FoX/Nader) to approve staff recommendation: 1)accept the 19092 GMOC Annual Report and
recommendations contained therein, and direct staff to undertake actions necessary to implement those
recommendations; and 2) direct staff to prepare the necessary Statements of Concern for issuance by the
Mayor regarding the Water, Schools, and Air Quality Thresholds. It should also be understood that Council
would get the quarterly Monitoring Reports for the police Priority 1 service calls. Approved 4-0-1 with
Horton absent.
MS (Rindone/Moore) direct staff to look into the development of an additional quality of standard for
alternat/ve fuels for future consideration by Council.
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 13
Councilmember Moore felt that maybe it should not be a new item but could be incorporated ham the Air
Quality Threshold.
Mayor Nader felt that would be more appropriate, agreed to by the Seconder of the motion.
VOTE ON MOTION AS AMENDED: approved 4-0-1 with Horton absent
* * * * Council recessed at 9:35 p.m. and reconvened at 9:45 p.m. * * * *
24. PUBLIC HEARING TENTATIVE SUBDMSION MAP PCS-90-07; APPEAL OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR THE SUNBOW II SUBDM SION,
TRACT 90-07 - On 7/14/93, the Planning Commission unanimously approved a one-time extension request
for the Sunbow II Subdivision. Due to time constraints and legal requirements of the application, the
applicant filed in advance an appeal of the Planning Commission decision to ensure that any potential
appeal, including the applicanfs own, could be considered by Council before the map expires (7/21/93)
Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Planning)
RESOLIJTION 17177 DENYING THE APPEAL AND AFFIRMING THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLIJTION TO APPROVE A ONE-YEAR TENTATIVE MAP EXTENSION FOR THE SUNBOW II
SUBDM SION, TRACT 90-07
Ken Lee, Assistant Director of Planning, stated staff had talked to Mr. Hall and explained to him that the
action requested by Council was an extension of the Tentative Map and did not deal with the land use issue
per se. The land use issue was settled through the General Development Plan and SPA Plan in 1989-90.
The industrial land was not adjacent to the property but approximately one-quarter mile to the east and was
a limited industrial zoning category and separated topographically by two ridges from the residential area.
Mayor Nader stated the prevailing party was appealing against itself in order to make sure there was a
timely hearing in order to expedite the process. If they waited, there was concern there could be regulatory
or economic consequences for the holder of the map. It was due to a series of regulatory circumstances.
This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was declared open.
· Jim Dawe, 750 "B" Street, Dan Diego, CA, representing Sunbow II, stated the Mayor's explanation
was accurate and that due to City ordinances it appeared it was necessary for them to come forward with
an appeal so the map would not expire. Other than a one or two sentence letter from Robinhood Home
Subdivision, they did not receive any comments in opposition to the extension.
City Attorney Boogaard requested that Mr. Dawe express his clients agreeability to the new conditions
imposed on the extension.
Mr. Dawe responded that his clients had already signed a letter agreeing to that except there was one
modification in Condition #95, last sentence, which was clarified "may require reconsideration~ rather than
"will require reconsiderafion". It was his understanding that would be acceptable to the staff.
City Attorney Boogaard questioned if all other conditions were acceptable.
Mr. Dawe responded yes.
· A.W. Hall, 1675 Pt. Reyes Court, Chula Vista, CA, member of the Resource Conservation Commission,
was not present. Mayor Nader read the following comment into the record: "I object to this extension
because of the land use permitted on the south side of Orange Avenue towards Robinhood~.
Minutes
duly 20, 1993
Page 14
· Nancy Bizzarri, 416 Third Avenue, #10, Chula Vista, CA, was not present when called.
There being no further public testimony, the public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION 17177 OFFERED BY MAYOR NADER, reading of the text was waived, passed and approved
4-0-1 with Horton absent.
Mayor Nader requested that staff look at amending the ordinance and regulations so an applicant would not
have to appeal themselves.
ORAL COMMIYNICATIONS
None
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
25. Request by the Housing Advisory Committee that Council negotiate for at least 200 existing rental
assistance certificates being administered by the San Diego County Housing Authority - Joe Casillas,
Chairman, Housing Advisory Committee. Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93.
MS eqader/Fox) to adopt the Housing Advisory Committee recommendation.
Councilmember Moore expressed concern that if the City went to fast on the Housing Commission there
would not be proper staffing and, if the City had the proper staffing, there would not be sufficient space.
VOTE ON MOTION: apprnved 4-0-1 with Horton absent.
ACTION ITEMS
26. REPORT UPDATE ON SOLID WASTE PARTICIPATION AGRggMENT AND
ALTERNATIVE DISPOSAL OPTIONS - Various options will be presented to Council for their consideration.
(City Manager) Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93.
City Manager Goss handed out a staff report submitted by Supervisor Slater which was adopted by the Board
at their meeting. The position stated the Board would support granting full governance of the County Solid
Waste System to the permanent solid waste commission. It was his understanding that the interim
commission had modified the Interim Solid Waste Agreement to change the date to 7/23/93. The second
action was to redetermine that there would be surcharge for non-signatory cities as of 8/1/93. There was
further discussion that some type of long term participation agreement and flow commitment was needed
for a strong partnership, long term planning, etc. Those actions did not change the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Rindone gave the presentation he had given to the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce
regarding the solid waste issue. The presentation focused on three aspects: 1) to explain in layroans terms
what the issue was; 2) to illustrate exactly what the current Council position was; and 3) proposed solutions.
The Chamber debated the issue extensively and developed a compromise. The resolution the north county
cities supported was the E1 Cajon resolution which was for one year - the Chamber felt ninety days would
be an encouragement and a "cooling off' period, allow for intensive negotiations, and a change in
governance.
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 15
Councilmember Fox stated the staff recommendation was to adopt recommendations 1 - 4. He questioned
whether Councilmember Rindone recommended adopting the E1 Cajon resolution in lieu of the staff
recommendation,
Councilmember Rindone stated his opinion was different than the staff recommendation. He disagreed on
Item 1 which he would not adopt as time would make it a moot point. He preferred making Item 3 the
Council's first position with the back-up position Item 2 (El Cajon resolution) and then Item 4 (legal
protection).
Mayor Nader felt two things were being confused, i.e. the Chamber position and the E1 Cajon resolution.
They both addressed two different issues and were compatible with each other. The Chamber
recommendation addressed an extension period that would be a moratorium on the surcharge the County
had proposed. The E1 Cajon resolution stated once a contract was signed a city would have a year to pull
out of the contract. He supported both actions.
Councilmember Rindone informed Council that he had sent to the other sixteen cities a copy of the Chamber
of Commerce compromise, as an individual Councilmember, indicating that he was planning to introduce
that as a compromise for consideration by Council. He also included the current position of the Council.
He felt it was important that the other cities saw the attempt to deal with the issue regionally.
MS (Fox/Nader) to adopt staff recommendations: 1) a communication be sent to Pain Slater, indicating that
ff she is interested in the Interim Commigsion addressing the issues as reflected in her July 14 !ether, that
she asselnble aH of the cities collectively to work through these issues before surcharges, arbitrary deadlines,
etc., are imposed, so that all the 'concerns' can be resolved, without having to deal with the artificial
distinction between a 'condition' and an 'understanding'; 2) the City Council support the El Cajon resolution
in submitting this joint effort to the Interim Commission; 3) adopt the resolution included as Attachment
C, which would advance the proposal of a tipping fee based on the free market rate, as well as the creation
of a Waste Act {WAD); and 4) that appropriate legal action be taken to protect the City and its ratepayen
from unreasonable tipping fee rate increases such as the proposed surcharge.
Mayor Nader felt the letter should not only go to Pare Slater but the entire Board of Supervisors. Agreeable
to the Maker of the motion.
Mayor Nader felt appropriate legal action needed to be filed immediately in terms of seeking declaratory
relief as to the County's authority to impose the surcharge. If the Court ruling went against the City the City
may want to reconsider their course of action but, it might be to late to do so if it was not filed immediately
to make the Court aware of the need for immediate ruling or an immediate injunction against the County
imposing the surcharge.
City Attomey Boogaard stated that in the proposed resolution, page 1, he proposed two relief forms: 1) relief
from the Statute of Limitations; and 2) a suspension of the surcharge for 120 days.
Mayor Nader stated he also wanted a suspension of the deadline for joining the commission.
City Attorney Boogaard recommended that Council go into closed session.
Councilmember Moore stated he could not argue the direction the majority vote was going in. There was
a lot more involved with what the County did and what they did with the tipping fee. He was concerned
that the City was becoming a "sue" city. The issue was not just trash but a solid waste system.
MSC (Nader/Rindone) to continue the meeting past 10:30 p.m. to deal with items 15, 28a, dosed session
and the Redevelopment Agency agenda. Approved 4-0-1 with Horton absent.
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 16
Council met in closed session and 11:10 p.m. and reconvened the Council meeting at 11:38 p,m.
l~.eiteration of Motion: (Fox) to adoptstaffrecommendations 1-4: 1) a communication be senttoPamSlater
and the County Board of Supervisom, indicating that if she is interested in the Interim Commission
addressing the issues as reflected in her July 14 letter, that she assemble all of the cities collectively to work
through these issues before surcharges, arbitrary deadlines, etc., are imposed, so that all the =concerns' can
be resolved, without having to deal with the artificial distinction between a 'condition' and an
'understanding'; 2) the City Council support the El Cajon resolution in submitlug this joint effort to the
Interim Commission; 3} adopt the resolution included as Attachment C, which would advance the proposal
of a tipping fee based on the flee market rate, as well as the creation of a Waste Act (WAD); and 4) that
appropriate legal action be taken to protect the City and its ratepayers from unreasonable tipping fee rate
increases such as the proposed surcharge.
Councilmember Moore questioned whether Item 4 should read "prepare legal action ... ".
Mayor Nader stated the motion would authorize legal action to be taken if Items 1-3 did not come to fruition
in a timely manner.
VOTE ON MOTION: approved 4-0-1 with Hotton absent and Moore abstaining on Item 4.
City Attorney Boogaard recommended that the Council meeting next Tuesday be continued to the 7/28/93
meeting at 8:00 a.m. at the County Administration Building.
Mayor Nader felt it would be useful if the cities that were non-signatory, but had participated in formulating
the E1 Cajon resolution, were represented and had a mutual understanding of a presentation to be made
impressing upon the County and the cities that had already signed that the cities were standing together
on the issues involved.
· Nancy Bizzarri, 416 Third Avenue #10, Chula Vista, CA, was not present when called.
ITEaMS pUI .l.El~ FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
Items pulled: 15, 16, 17, and 18. The minutes will reflect the published agenda order.
OTHF. R BUSINESS
27. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S) - None
28. MAYOR'S RF. PORT(S)
a. Ratification of appointments:
Appeals and Advisors - Thomas F. Leonard (reappoint);
Cultural Arcs Commission - Larry V. Dumlao (reappoint);
Cultural Ar~s Commission - Carlos Gilbert Pelayo;
Design Review Commission - Dan Way;
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 17
Library Board of Trustees - Ronald E. Willjams (reappoint);
Economic Development Commission Ex-Officio Sheila Washington (Continued from the meeting of
7/13/93);
International Friendship Commission - Louis Alvarez (Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93};
Planning Commission - William C. Tuchscher (reappoint);
Resource Conservation Commission - Barbara Ann Hall (reappoint);
Resource Conservation Commission - Michael Johnson (reappoint);
Safety Commission - Stephen C. Padilia (reappoint).
MSC (Nader/Rindone) to ratify the appoinmlents to the boards/commissions. Approved 4-0-1 with Hotton
absent.
b. Reconsideration of 1993/94 budget. Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93. Continued to the
7/27/93 meeting.
c. Cox Cable adult channel. Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93. Continued to the 7/27/93
meeting.
29. COUNCIL COMMENrlx3
Councilman Fox
· Review of Police Department policy regarding minor narcotic law violations on school campuses.
Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93. Continued to the 7/27/93 meeting.
Councilman Moore
· Reconsideration of Solid Waste Management Agreement and eligibility to serve on Interim
Commission by listing areas of concem as understandings versus conditions and that the various City's items
of understanding to be among the first order of business of the Commission. Continued from the meeting
of 7/13/93. Continued to the 7/27/93 meeting.
· Letters to Mayors of Imperial Beach, National City, and City of San Diego regarding Eighth District
area and County Board of Supervisors regarding First District south of SR-54 urging them to join Chula Vista
in a unified effort regarding a basic divergence program and a follow-up meeting with Presiding Juvenile
Judge Pate, Probation Department, and District Attorneys Office. Goal is to agree upon a minimum
offer/court fine of thirty days of community service with parent presence for fifty per cent of the service
when youths are apprehended in acts of graffiti application. Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93.
Continued to the 7/27/93 meeting.
Councilman Rindone
· Evaluation criteria for City Manager and format. Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93.
Continued to the 7/27/93 meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council recessed at 11:51 p.m. and reconvened at 11:58 p.m. in a closed session immediately
following the Council meeting to discuss:
Minutes
July 20, 1993
Page 18
)
City Attorney Boogaard requested Council declare an urgency and discuss appointment of a Deputy City
Attorney in closed session.
MSC (Nader/Fox) to fledare an urgency and meet in dosed session to discuss: personnel matters per
Government Code Section 549567. Approved 4-O-1 with Hotton absent.
Instructions to negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 - Chula Vista Employees
Association (CVEA), Western Council of Engineers (WCE), Police Officers Association (POA),
International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), Executive Management, Mid-Management, and
Unrepresented. Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93.
Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. County
of San Diego regarding booking fees. Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93.
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Jones Intercable. Continued
from the meeting of 7/13/93.
Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. County
of San Diego regarding tipping fee surcharge. Continued from the meeting of 7/13/93.
Evaluation of City Manager pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.
ADJOURNMENT AT 12:59 A.M. to a Joint Meeting of the City Council/County Board of Supervisors on
Wednesday, July 21, 1993 at 3:00 p.m. at the County Administration Center, thence to a Joint Meeting of
the City Council/County Board of Supervisors on Thursday, July 22, 1993 at 3:00 p.m. at the County
Administration Center, thence to a Joint Meeting of the City Council/County Board of Supervisors on
Monday, July 26, 1993 at 3:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, and thence to the Regular City Council
Meeting on July 27, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
A Special Joint Meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency convened at 11:52 p.m. and adjourned
at 11:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CMC, City Clerk
by: Vicki C. Sodkerquist, Deputy City ~fk