Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1993/03/30 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETINGFWORKSESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITLILA VISTA Tuesday, March 30, 1993 Council Conference Room 6:07 p.m. Administration Bu~d/ng CAIL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Councilmembers Fox, Horton, Moore, Rindone, and Mayor Nader ALSO PRESENT: John D. Goss, City Manager; Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney; and Vicki C. Soderquist, Deputy City Clerk CONSENT C,~J Otem pulled: 5) BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALF. NDAR OFP'ERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE. reading of the text was waived, passed and approved unanimously, 2. ~!1'11-/~I COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter of resignation from the Charter Review Comrnltree - Vickie E. Turner. It is recommended that the resignation be accepted and the City Clerk be directed to post immediately according to the Maddy Act in the Clerk's Office and the Public Library. 3. RESOLUTION 17052 ALrrHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF POLICE DEPARTIVENT ta'I'IZEN COMPLAINT RECORDS - The destruction of outdated citizen complaint records is being requested. The destruction is in compliance with 832.5 of the California Penal Code and conforms with the records retention policy. The purpose is to comply with Penal Code 832.5 and to conserve storage space. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Chief of Police) 4. RESOLUTION 17053 APPROVING THE FILING OF THREE APPLICATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM FUNDS UNDER THE I~ODAL SUP. FACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT (ISTEA) OF 1991 AND DESIGNATING THE ta'l t ENGINEER AS THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PROGRAM ~ California is scheduled to receive more than $200 million over a six-year period (six cycles) under this program. Projects must be directly connected to the transportation system and should also provide maximum enhancement to the environments and communities. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 5. RESOLLrFION 17047 REAPPROPRIATING FUNDS, RESCINDING AWARD OF CONTRACT TO NELSON ROOFING, INC. FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING REROOFING AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO THE SECOND LOW BIDDER, LA QUINTA ROOFING, INC. - On 2/9/93, Councfi awarded contracting for the Police Department building reroo~ng to Nelson Roofing, Inc. The conttacwr, however, was unable to provide the required liability insurance before the contract could be executed. Nelson Roofing, Inc. was notified of the proceedings and was unresponsive. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. 4/5's vote required. Continued from the 3/23/93 meeting. Pulled from the consent calendar. Minutes March 30, 1993 Page 2 Councilman Rindone stated he favored Option I - to accept the policy and leave the award with Nelson Roofing, as it would save the City $2,600. The contractor had been duly noted and the City did not have to waste money to prove their point. MS (Rindone/Nader) to accept the policy and leave the award with Nelson Roofing. Clifford Swanson, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer, informed Council that Nelson Roofing did supply the insurance certificate on Friday morning after the Council meeting. Staff felt that due to the problems encountered in obtaining the certificate there could be problems in administrating the contract. Sid Morris, Assistant City Manager, stated that staff felt it was possibly an indication of what the City could run into in the future with the contractor. By awarding it to the second low bid the City could potentially be saving substantially more than $2,600. Mayor Nader questioned whether the City had any experience with Nelson Roofing. Mr. Swanson stated he was unaware if there were any other contracts with Nelson Roof'rag. He had been informed by the Building Maintenance Superintendent that they were a competent contractor. Mayor Nader questioned whether the contract contained provisions requiring compensation to the City for any delays, errors or omissions. Mr. Swanson stated that if it was a performance issue the Mayor was correct. However, if the contractor gave the City trouble with the rest of the contract, as he did with the insurance, it could cost the City a lot of staff time. Councilman Rindone stated if there was trouble during the contract the City would never be interested in awarding another contract to Nelson Roofing in the future. Staff was correct in proceeding in another direction but he did not concur with the final recommendation. City Attorney Boogaard stated options available to the Council would be: 1) accept the low bidder, 2) reject all bids and rebid the job, and 3) declare the first bidder in default and award the contract to the second lowest bidder. Mayor Nader felt the contract should provide for cancellation or liquidated damages if the contractor caused an unreasonable use of staff time. He questioned whether the failure to meet the deadline set for the insurance certificate caused undue staff time. Mr. Swanson stated that it had. SIJB511 [LrIE MOTION: (Nader) the contract be offered to the low bidder provided they compensate the City for the staff time caused by their failure to come back in a timdy manner with information required; the alternative be to go with the second lowest bidder. Motion died for lack of second. Councilwoman Horton felt the contractor had already shown how they would work with the City. The $2,600 was significant but she felt it would be extremely stressful in working with them. Counc~man Fox stated the insurance certificate was a fundamental item required of contractors and for staff to have to follow-up as they did was beyond what was expected. He supported the staff recommendation. Minutes March 30, 1993 Page 3 Mayor Nader stated that if the motion passed he expected legal staff to look at the contract before it went to him for signature and if there were any questions as to the City being fully covered by liquidated damages he wanted it to come back to Council for reconsideration before signing. VOTE ON MOTION: approved 3-2 with Fox and Horton opposed. * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBLIC FIEARINGS AND RI~LATED RESOLLrrlONS AND ORDINANCES None submitted. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS · William E. Claycomb, 457 Delaware Street, Imperial Beach, CA 91932, representing Save Our Bay, Inc., expressed his concern regarding any development which would adversely affect values on lands subject to any State public trust ownership interest. · Tony Ciotti, 1338 Santa Cruz Court, Chula Vista, CA 91910, referred to the recent homicides near the park. The park area did not have lights and he expressed their concern with the drinking, drug use, and loitering in the area after dark. The residents of the area requested that the park be closed at sundown. Richard Emerson, Chief of Police, informed Council that the park bordered residential areas. There had been significant enhanced enforcement in the area with assistance from the beat officers. Mayor Nader questioned whether there was a curfew that could be enforced. Chief Emerson responded there was a curfew but the problem was probably with those above curfew age. Mayor Nader questioned whether the curfew ordinance could be extended for that particular park. He hoped that ff there were violations of the public drinking laws, loitering laws, or curfews they would be enforced. City Attorney Boogaard stated the park could be closed during particular hours which would not be a curfew. MS (Nader/Horton) to refer to staff to continue enforcement of the public diirlking and loitering laws and report back to Council on either an extension of the curfew or a particular closure hour, Councilman Moore stated that no matter what action was taken there would be a problem with enforcement. The posting of the property should be the first priority. Councilman Fox assumed that Council would receive information on how the recommended action would affect the legal use of the park, i.e. traveling through the park at night, summer hours, etc. Councilwoman Harton requested that the report include information on any other parks within the City with similar problems, i.e. no lighting, loitering, etc. Mayor Nader stated he would incorporate that into the motion. He requested that Neighborhood Watch and neighborhood groups assist the Police Department. Minutes March 30, 1993 Page 4 Councilman Rindone stated the City had experienced other times when action had to be taken in order to control particular problems. It was not for every park and he hoped staff would consider that when bringing back their recommendations. VOTE ON MOTION: approved unanimously. ACTION ITEMS 6. REGIONAL SOLID WASTE ISSUES AND THE PROPOSED PARTICIPATION AGREFAMENT - A presentation by Stephanie Snyder, Principal Management Assistant, on the status of regional solid waste issues and discussion of a proposed Solid Waste Participation Agreement. (Administration) Stephanie Snyder, Principal Management Assistant, highlighted the Cit3/s responsibilities and changes in the proposed Solid Waste Participation Agreement. Councilman Moore updated the Council regarding the Solid Waste Summit. A motion had been passed to appoint two elected officials from north county coastal, north county inland, east county, and south county along with the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Board of Supervisors. There would also be one attorney from the city group and one attorney from the county and one key staff member from each of the groups. Larry Sheehan, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer, County of San Diego, stated the Board of Supervisors had stated they did not have a problem with a city manager and city attorney from each of the four subagencies. Councilman Moore felt the key issue was that the City should concentrate on four to eight major concerns in the agreement. He did not want a bunch of legal technicalities, but the major concerns with recommendations and alternatives. Major concerns were the twenty year period; where the funding from the $52 million dollar bond would go; what the difference was between a JPA and commission; and who would make the decision regarding rate increases. Mrs. Snyder handed out follow-up recommendations to the proposed Solid Waste Participation Agreement. The recommendation was to utilize a phased approach in amending the agreement. Because the County owned, operated, and managed the system, the City was on the outside looking in. The question was whether the City wanted to be a partner and if so, the City would be facing questions such as: where to site a landfill, whether to build transfer stations, rail hauling part of the flow, etc. City Manager Goss listed seven issues: 1) term of agreement, 2) flow control, 3) long term obligations, i.e. long term disposal sites, 4) governance, S) solid waste facility fees, 6) rates and tipping fees, and 7) past liability. City Attorney Boogaard suggested there were other major concerns, i.e. City General Fund liability. Other points of concern were: 1) Emergency and Other Exceptions, 2) authority to set tipping fees, 3) NCKA facility capability/costs. Counc~man Moore felt staff needed to give Council a listing of the problems, options, and impacts and he did not want to wait two months for the report. Councilman Rindone stated he was concerned with trying to assess the County position. He questioned how serious the County was in giving up their authority and going into a JPA. The Council's number one responsibility was to assure that the City had a solid waste facility available and their second priority was Minutes March 30, 1993 Page 5 to assure the best rates for the rate payers. He questioned what the City could do in assisting in the $52 million dollar assurance and coming up with a long term plan that provided the best rate for the rate payers. He wanted the staff report to include an assessment of the short term and long term rates the consumer would be facing as the Council examined the various options. Councilman Moore stated another item should be regional fees versus county fees. Ms. Sheehan stated that until there was some way of controlling where the flow went the fees were not equal across the system. The NCRA facility would serve the entire region in terms of credit for recycling for meeting AB939 requirements. It had been their experience that it should be kept as a system with the system fees kept equalized in order to serve the entire region, The Participation Agreement was not intended to solve a short term problem. There was a long term problem and that was how much waste should be planned for in the county. The County Board was open to joint participation. The Board was also open to setting up something as a Special Act District where all the staffing, decision making, etc. was vested in the authority or to a commission as proposed. City Attorney Boogaard stated a JPA would depend upon what liabilities the cities were being asked to absorb and what extent the JPA members would be liable for the liabilities of any one violating member. There was discussion that the cities in the county could form a JPA and then contract with the county for senrice. There were different forms of JPA's. Councilman Rindone stated the proposal hadn't gone far enough and Council had not received enough information from staff to analyze alternatives or specifics. There needed to be a thorough analysis of the participation agreement after it was reworked by the Task Force. Once that had been done and the agreement was acceptable to the representatives of the eighteen c/ties, staff should analyze the impacts upon the City and the rate payers. Staff should also assess a county-wide JPA and the potential impacts including current liabilities; and a south county JPA. Councilman Fox stated the staff recommendation before Council only dealt with the Participation Agreement and not alternatives. He questioned whether staff would be coming back with alternatives. City Manager Goss stated that part of the recommendation was to go along with some of the other cities that had already taken action and say that the City was not willing to allow total flow control at this point. MSUC (Moore/Rindone) to direct staff to formulate the key concerns Coe specific), make recomrnefidations with poss~le alternatives and/or repercussions, and have available for the first meeting of the SANDAG County Task Force. Councilman Moore stated the three recommendations were vague and he felt the City needed to be more specific to the county. City Manager Goss stated the reason for the recommendation was to create the framework then staff would look at the specific issues that Council wanted them to specifically address. When stating that the City did not agree with total flow control but could mean, based on the analysis, a partial flow contzol or no flow control. Staff was saying they were uncomfortable with total flow control and wanted a policy statement that said Council did not support that. Councilman Rindone stated that before Council could give a policy statement they needed an analysis of the pro's and con's and alternatives. That information was not available to Council at this time. Minutes March 30, 1993 Page 6 Councilman Moore stated he would not agree with the two months included in the second recommendation. Staff knew the key concerns and had done advance work and therefore did not need 30 - 45 days. Mrs. Snyder stated it would not take 45 days to bring back the specifics, she was referring to the final analysis once the new Participation Agreement came from the Task Force. Specific concerns could be prepared within a week. Councilman Fox requested that the City Attorney's concerns also be addressed. Councilman Moore stated that more information regarding the City's concerns regarding Recommendation #1 should be included in the response to the County. He felt that Recommendation #3 should be brought back to Council within 3-4 weeks. Mayor Nader expressed concern over the voting power and control. He questioned whether the City would be better off being an advisory body to the county with the county making the decisions. He hoped that staff would address that issue. City Attorney Boogaard stated his major concern with the document was the "Flow Control Covenant". Recent cases dealing with the Commerce Clause had ruled that similar Flow Control Covenants were illegal. Mayor Nader requested that the City Attorney work with staff to propose a remedy to the defect. He questioned whether there was anything that would prevent the City, through the exercising of rate setting, from taking into consideration when passing on rate requests, the appropriateness of Laidlaw's decision as to where they took their trash. City Attorney Boogaard responded that it was an untested area of the law. The Commerce Clause had been ruled to validate Flow Control Covenants and bond counsel for the county had proposed the language which took a step beyond what any case had ruled. MSUC (Mooreftqader) direct staff to prepare a letter for the Mayor's signature to the Chairman of the County Board of Supervisors to address the Council's concerns with a statement such as *the~e will be presented in appropriate verbiage for the Task Force'. Crhose concerns as outlined by the Council, City Manager, and City Attorney.) I~SUC (Moore/Nader) to direct staff to review the major concerns voiced and return within thirty day~ with recommendations and alternatives. Mayor Nader requested that staff also be authorized to discuss the concerns with the County. * * * Counc~ recessed at 8:02 p.m. and reconvened at 8:13 p.m. * * * 7. CI.R/kN WATER PROGRAM - A presentation on the history options to Chula Vista and issues concerning the new San Diego Area Wastewater Management District. Staff and consultants will present options available to Chula Vista for Wastewater Treatment and issues that need to be resolved prior to final decision to join the regional system. (Director of Public Works) John Lippitt, Director of Public Works, reviewed the goals, cost issues, consumers alternative, special act district, and alternative studies. Frank Dudeck, Dudeck & Assoc., reviewed the Alternative Study and the four alternatives. Minutes March 30, 1993 Page 7 Mayor Nader stated that one of the alternatives discussed was to negotiate a contract with IBWC and questioned whether that would be pursued if Council chose Alternatives 2 or 3. Mr. Dudeck agreed with the Mayor. He then rev/ewed the cost issues of each alternative. The recommended alternative from the Committee was 2A - partially join SAD; Chula Vista control Otay Valley WRF; excluding oversizing and reclamation. City Attorney Boogaard stated there was no "Duty to Serve" in SAD and therefore it would be a decision relegated to a regular or weighted voting process. One of the mechanisms being discussed was mending the SAD legislation to include a "Duty to Serve" which would exempt it from the weighted or regular voting process. The concern was that non-growth cities would not vote to expand the capacity system to handle Chula Vista's new growth. It would be delegating the City's land use decisions to other parts of the county. Mayor Nader stated the real issue was the split between existing and future rate payers. The City did not want the existing rate payers to subsidize the new growth in the City or elsewhere in the county. He stated one of the continuing controversies with the Board was the weighted voting issue. Under the present structure the City of San Diego could call For a weighted vote on any item. A proposal that was passed would recommend to the State Legislature that they amend the District Legislation to change the procedure which would allow the City of San Diego to have veto power over anything the District did but could not unilaterally pass anything. A weighted vote could only be used to kill action. The other restriction would be that a weighted vote could never be taken on items dealing with personnel issues. The Board voted to set up a budget of $100,000 and assess the members. He had voted against compensation for Board Members which had been legislated up to $100 per meeting. He felt the key issues that were unresolved in addition to what would happen to the excess capacity that had already been contracted for were: 1) how would costs of capacity expansion be spread between existing rate payers versus new rate payers, and 2) the water reclamation issue. The Board was not acting on those issues and the clock was ticking. In order to pull out safely to avoid a lawsuit, the City needed to use the earliest date which according to the City Attorney was November 1st. The other restriction on the City's right to pull out dealt with the incurfence of debt obligation by the District. MS {Nader/Fox} go with Alternative ZA and direct staff to monitor the proceedings at SAD and prepare whatever was necessary to assure that the City could convey their decision to drop out on a momenB notice if it appeared that SAD was about to consider the incurfence of debt prior to the issues being resolved to the City's satisfaction. Councilman Fox questioned whether it was the intent of the motion to rank the alternatives as recommended or just deal with 2A. Mayor Nader stated that the motion dealt with Alternative 2A. City Attorney Boogaard questioned whether the motion was Alternative 2A including trying to negotiate 1 through 8. Mayor Nader stated there were other issues that needed to be negotiated and those were the issues that he had listed and staff had gone through. AMENDIVIENT TO MOTION: (Nader/Fox) to direct staff to continue looking at negotiations with IBWC if SAD didn't work out. Councilman Moore questioned who would run the plants, Minutes March 30, 1993 Page 8 Roger Fromfelder, Interim General Manager of SAD, stated the wastewater plants, under the district concept, would be run by the district. The water side would go to the purveyor. Mayor Nader stated that before voting on the motion he felt he needed to appraise the Council of where he felt the City needed to be going. The City of San Diego was lobbying in Congress for amendments to the Clean Water Act that would allow the cities to go to advanced primary with chemical enhancement combined with an extended outfall and he felt the City should join in their efforts. The issue of who paid for capacity enhancement and the contract with the City of San Diego for capacity in excess of what was needed should be addressed. The issue of what would happen if the Clean Water amendments did not pass or if the Judge ordered secondary treatment should be the City of San Diego's responsibility. On the reclamation issue the proposal advanced by the City's consultant and others was that it was desirable to build the plant in a modular or incremental manner. The City should also continue to examine the IBWC alternative in the event that the other issues were not satisfactorily dealt with at SAD. AMENDMFANT TO MOTION: 0Nlader/Fox) to incorporate the issues outlined by the Mayor into the motion on the floor. Councilman Moore stated the motion was to go to Alternative 2A and continue to work on the eight items. Another item to be addressed would be fines that San Diego had incurred or would incur because of lack of compliance with State and/or Federal laws. Mayor Nader stated that other points contained in the motion were: 1) support for the Clean Water Act amendment, 2) the modular reclamation consu~uction, 3) continue to pursue options with IBWC, and 4) - directing staff to prepare a contingent withdrawal from SAD if it appeared that incurfence of debt was ) eminent ptior to solution of the City's concerns. Councilman Moore requested that direction to staff regarding the potential withdrawal from SAD be removed from the motion. Mayor Nader stated he would separate it from the motion. VOTE ON MOTION AS AMENDED: approved unanimously. MS (Nader/Fox) to direct staff and the City representatives on SAD to be prepared to withdraw fi'om SAD if it appeared that SAD was about to consider debt obligation prior to resolution of the issues as outlined by Council. Mayor Nader felt it was necessary to send a message to SAD staff and Board that the issues needed to be moved forward on and negotiated seriously and not expect Chula Vista to participate on any terms they dictated unless the issues were satisfactorily resolved. VOTE ON MOTION: approved 3-2 with Horton and Moore opposed. City Attomey Boogaard stated he understood the motion as a legal advisory since the City Council had the power to withdraw. Council had delegated to two members that power to extricate Chula Vista from SAD on the threat of the incurrence of debt that would otherwise preclude it from the next few months. Mayor Nader agreed with the City Artorney's assessment. Minutes March 30, 1993 Page 9 Mr. Lippitt stated that SB1225 had a provision that any time the SAD Board was going to take any action that would impact the rate payers or incur debt they would have to go back to member agencies and get an advisory vote by all the legislative bodies. City Attorney Boogaard stated there was a bonded indebtedness provision that required an advisory vote but non-bonded indebtedness, which could trigger the extrication clause did not require an advisory vote. Mr. Fromfelder stated it was his understanding that any action to raise rates or incur debt required an advisory vote. That had been amended in Sacramento. Mayor Nader stated the motion dictated that staff research the issue and ff it was the case that no debt could be incurred without an advisory vote of each legislative body staff would not have to do anything further other than advising Council. If it was possible to incur debt without an advisory vote staff needed to be prepared to advise the Committee members to execute withdrawal. 8. EXCURSION TRAIN OPERATIONS ON THE CORONADO BRANCH - A letter was received from The Western Group, P.O. Box 1544 Ogden, Utah 84402, making a formal proposal to establish excursion train operations on the Coronado Branch of the SD&AE Railway. (Community Development) Charles Alban, representing the Western Group, stated they had made a proposal to MTDB to establish an excursion railroad service. They felt there was a demand for a tourist train and felt it could be a world wide attraction. They anticipated daily service with an annual ridership of over 200,000. City Manager Goss stated the staff report was incomplete as it did not address the long term efforts of the City of Imperial Beach, Coronado, and Chula Vista to establish a bike route that would circle the Southbay. How the excursion train would fit into that plan would have to be investigated as the railroad right-of-way was part of the bike route. Councilman Moore didn't feel that staff time should be set aside until the following questions were answered: 1) the Western Group's financial ability to accomplish their proposal was established, 2) a modified traffic study regarding additional railroad crossings, 3) boarding sites in Chula Vista - pro's and con's of land use, and 4) how to solve the problem if the railroad didn't go anywhere, Councilman Kindone stated he had placed the item on the agenda because it would be discussed by MTDB and he wanted the entire Council to be aware of the issue. He requested that staff forward all information to the Council. City Manager Goss stated staff had raised the question with MTDB of getting the right-of-way for the Southbay bike route and had been informed that they were not willing to do that because they wanted to see the excursion train go in. Mr. Alban stated he did not feel the two programs were mutually exclusive. ITEMS PUILED FROM THE CONSENT CAT.RNDP~. Item pulled: 5. The minutes will reflect the published agenda order. Minutes March 30, 1993 Page 10 OTHER BUSINESS ~I'IY MANAGER'S REPORT(S) - None. 10. MAYOR'S REPORT(S) · Mayor Nader stated he had received correspondence on the proposed liquor store on Hilltop Drive and "J" Street and questioned whether that was covered by the Alcohol Retail in CN Zone Ordinance. City Manager Goss stated that it was not. It was his understanding that the zoning ordinance covered alcohol sales and all they were doing under the ordinance was modifying what their current sales were. He was uncertain that the City would take any action on the request. Richard Emerson, Chief of Police, informed Council that his department had submitted a response to ABC two weeks ago. ABC would take approximately one month to complete their processing. Mayor Nader requested that the item be docketed under his report for 4/13/93. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Moore · Councilman Moore stated that due to the time sensitivity of having to report back to Judge Pate he would like Council to take action on an amendment to the Graffiti Ordinance. ORDINANCE 2549 PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE GRAFFITI ORDINANCE TO PERM1T THE POLIC~ (I-fIEF TO OI'FP.R ADIVERSION PROGRAM OF COMMUNITY SERVICE WITH PARENTAL SUPERVISION TO MINORS ENGAGING IN CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AND ADULTS COMMA FlING GRAFF1T[ OPFE_I'qSES (first reading) MSUC (Nader/Moore) to find that the item arose after the posting of the agenda and therefore was an urgency item that could not reasonably wait until the next agenda. ORDINANCE 2S49 PLACED ON FIRST READING BY COUNCILWOMAN HORTON, reading of the text was waived, passed and appreved unanimously. Councilman Rindone a. MTDB: Southbay Public Transportation Plan 1993 - Councilman Rindone informed Council that MTDB had passed the Public Transportation Plan at their last meeting. b. Councilman Rindone stated he had copies of the tapes by Ray Smith, Counselor for Triple Crown, regarding an update on gangs and activities in the Southbay. Councilwoman Horton requested that Councilman Rindone continue the item to a later date. Minutes March 30, 1993 Page 11 c. Councilman Rindone distributed surveys for a science project regarding civic leaders. The study was to determine whether there was a relationship to participating in community activities and the sequence of the position in the family. He requested that the Clerk mail the surveys to the Hilltop Junior High School. ADJOUILNMENT The City Council continued the following Closed Session item to the meeting of 4/1/93: Instruction to negotiate/property acquisition for Midbayfront (William Barkett, owner, parcel bounded by Chula Vista Nature Interpretative Center to the north; Bay Boulevard to the east; San Diego Bay to the west; and "F' Street to the south) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. ADJOURNMENT AT 9:52 P.M. to the Regular City Council Meeting on April 13, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Respectfully submitted, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CMC, City Clerk \ by: Vicki C. Soderquist, Depud~'~_~erk