Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995/03/06 Board of Ethics Minutes I I CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF A BOARD OF ETHICS MEETING March 6, 1995 City Attorney's Conference Room 3:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Harriet Acton, Jerry McNutt, Billy Kelley, Joanne Carson, and Richard Schulman MEMBERS ABSENT: Susan Herney (unexcused) (excused) , Martha Villegas STAFF PRESENT: Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney The meeting was called to order by Chairman Acton at 3:45 p.m. Roll was called and all members were present except Members Herney and Villegas. MSUC (Carson/McNutt) to excuse Susan Herney due to a scheduling conflict. MSUC (Schulman/McNutt) to approve the minutes of the February 27, 1995. Aqenda Item 3 - Ethics Ordinance Amendment. S2.28.010 - Purpose of Code of Ethics The Board discussed the provisions of !;2. 28.010 and determined there were three purposes: (1) establish jurisdiction (2) establish ethical standards and (3) create a Board of Ethics. Member McNutt questioned adding "government employees" to the last sentence of the section, however, Member Schulman suggested using "all city" employees in the first sentence of the second paragraph. The second paragraph will now read: The purpose of this Code is to create the Board of Ethics, judge ethical behavior of specific covered officials and to render advice to all city employees and officials. S2.28.020 - Jurisdiction of Board of Ethics. Richard Schulman asked if the Board could address a double jeopardy type issue. Attorney Boogaard pointed out the proposed provisions of Subsection B included unethical conduct (1) not subject to prosecution by state or federal authorities (2) or which is subject to such prosecution but such authorities have declined to investigate or prosecute, or delayed such investigation or prosecution for an unreasonable time. Member Schulman discussed adding a Subsection C "where the conduct does not meet the legal standard for guilt in the judicial system but reasonable grounds exist to determine that unethical conduct I I Board of Ethics 3-6-95 Minutes Page Two has taken place and recommend to the Council that some other sanction take place". Attorney Boogaard informed him this was covered under the proposed language but suggested adding "either by the completion of the criminal process, or lapse of the statute of limitations to prosecute criminally" to the section. Chairman Acton asked if it is determined that an act was a premeditated move to defraud, what happens before an elected official must leave office. The Charter states if a councilmember is convicted of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude, the City Council makes the call ~o remove a member. Richard Schulman inquired if acts of omission are covered, e.g., if the City Manager closes his eyes to unethical behavior, is he acting unethically? Attorney Boogaard responded to be an ethical violation, you have to have a state of mind component known legally as a "mens rea" meaning a criminal intent. Jerry McNutt asked if ex-city officials are defined somewhere and it was agreed to add the phrase "for a period of one year after leaving office" at the end of Paragraph A. Mr. McNutt further suggested adding "advisory opinion" as delineated in Footnote 4 and it was the consensus to add the language contained in 52.28.060 as Subsection C to 52.28.020. Billy Kelley questioned "reasonable" vs. "factual" basis in 52.28.150 and it was agreed to use both phrases therein. Attorney Boogaard proposed homework for the members in trying to think of a violation which is not a criminal act, but is unethical. Aqenda Item 4 - Ethics Traininq Update. It was reported that Toni McKean was in Washington, D.C. for the Train-the-Trainer session and the Board requested she attend their next meeting to present a brief oral report on the training. The presentation by the Josephson Institute on ethics has now been scheduled for Saturday, June 17, 1995 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. MSUC (Carson/McNutt) to excuse Billy Kelley from the Board's next meeting due to military reserve training. MSUC (McNutt/Carson) to adjourn at 5:20 p.m. to the next meeting scheduled for March 20, 1995 at 3:30 p.m. &~~ Lorraine Kraker C:\ethics\.inutes\3-6-95