HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/06/05 Additional Information
~~~
~
~
~
((:01& CIDlF
CCrHJlUllA W~~~
June 5, 2008
Growth Management
Oversight Commission
City Council/Planning Commission
and GMOC Joint Workshop
A
~ I)()O)) D
Ei '~h~' w
~~ ~~I a,
[0 'WUG
=J '
~
I\)
o
o
00
:t>
~
~
c:
OJ
;0
(I)
TJ
o
.,
.....
-11~~~~~~i
~ ~
<OJ1Rf <liF C. .
.i1 CClHJUILJ~W~~ . ommlSSlon
lj
~
. ~
!J
;,'1;j
J
!
.1
m
'I
.~, .~
.. iq
j
%
~
. ~
'1
I
)J
~I
~J...
~~lt3
:'J
ij
jl
A
.:. October Retreat
.:. 15 Bi-Weekly Meetings
.:. January Field Trip
,:~:" ,;k, "' "'1
, b::':~:}." ;\, jIg
-', "~.," '.. ,,,.'~
, .-""-~ ; ,
G)
s:
o
n
J:
-"
en
......
o
~
Q)
~
c.
-c
..,
o
n
CD
c..
c:
..,
CD
(IJ
.:" ~
A 1',1:,
~.'11[':!
~i~n~'!'
~~ i~~~~:':,
~ .,
1",'"
,;1(';'
"i"
i'i l~ ;;.i
G)'"
..,
0'"
~'
,-+:',."
,,'I
::r"
" ~',nl:tj'
'I Q) ",:,",:
o ::J"i!i;"", .,',
3 Q),',I,
3 (,QIII,i,l:i:,i:i
....... CD.,..ij
,^ 31:.:;,JiI"
VI .,:,,-:;i;:;:",;
(J) CD';''''
-."",,1
O -"I!,.,iiFII',f
..." ,:~i,p,<:'!'i
~ r+.1,',1
rBIiIIIII j'\':;'"
O"~I"Cj':I
",'J',
m<II"::'''I,.fl
-,.,./'",,,,> !
..:;; ,
.. ':", ,I
.., ",,::
,ftl I,;j'"i I)'
VI"I"I'i'i"'('
_'~">';::;~C
(C"
~<:,j~;>'J
--':.'''',:;:':::;;
. ~;:;I",',:~,i,'
"
i:I
Ei ~~~d;'
i~ ~~~U~
?> :
-.
""J;; :
Uli'iiJ,,:y,
....,' ,I,
0', "::
<!,Ii> )',
< ,~"
r+\;:
~';.!ijJ';I:r'
,<;+p,;)H
j, ~:",1:T:'
3:'"
,...., "", :
'I NIl',';
o ~.;",
" ,:i~ij:n:,j;j:n
3 ~"i",
3 cg:::i::';;'
en" 3:",; i
1ft ",' 'i
VI ,." ,/,"
-" ::;"', .
o ....;"
-..r"""II.'h
-' 0':""
<'i:i(;;,!:;ii;~';
CD';':'
.., "','.
(J)';)i\~;ii;!!;,::f !
-~, "
(Q ,.
"01.,0,:::,,,
::r:'i.
., ;~,.. 'i'';
, ,\T I
:e
:T
o
en
r+
:r-
eo
G)
S
o
o
-.v
I
!'I.'<:'::,.I
,,', ,;
)
i
J
i
l
i
(QJ1J'\f(~IJ
(Ci}{]lLl~~ wn:Wf\
: 'c1~t'\:"G^M:5~'M~~riib~~~.. ~ l,:~{;:
Representing Member
Education Stan Canaris
Development Tim P. Jones
Environment Duane Bazzel
Business Kevin O'Neill, Chair
Planning Commission Joanne Clayton
Vice-Chair
Southeast Eric Sutton
Center City Russ Hall
Southwest Steve Palma
Sweetwater/Bon ita David Krogh
-,,",
...
~, , ", ,.c. " fi.
" , .,,~. '~","":I':.'V"~"" . ':".:...':.M:.~.::1
- ';j"~:>,~
~~";;:V'%::,'
~
::T
tu
.....
c
o
(t)
fA
r+
::r-
(I)
G)
S
o
o
c
o
"-v
A ".
se ~ ,I"','~i
Egl if~',
~~ ~,"
~01 ~ ',!,!
~.I j~~\~i
I
I
I
i
~
I
G),,'"
""",y
0'"
~"
r+
::r
"
S:'
('") Q):"'i,,::
o ::;'i,~.:,i(
3 0):":'.,,:
(0:',',:,
3 "")",
,,,,:;"!:"'i)F
..... 3':':1
~ CD;:i;:i,~
-. ::;,. ",;:,t-
o r+'i
1<I";,:ii'!:"i!
::1 Q!
,"" I
<"::"'l:'d:L>i
"iP,"'!i'Y-,_ '
CD":,':~i?l:*
..., > _: f:;!
#,,[,:,'
VI"!,,;.,,:,,.,,~
--!-'~:;;'m-;!~:
ce',,'1
r-'i,i
~;,:'i.::'>i
. ,1
.T 1
'. ,,"" ~
',;;,;
i..",;;?i:'!!:;:: :
,
'i ,;
'1l
,.-1.:,>>
"""<';;:V;;:
-, '"~
1 ' ",,:, ", ,,, , , ,,,:,,,,,,,,,,"," . '=""'" == .., '. ,~. ,.... """,,",, ~. ."..,.,. .'. ." ."U ..
, "~ ,tc".;~i:i 'oJit~: M~ rf'a:Ji:!rff~ {ft~b~~~gi~~h iA .
(mm~I1%\V~~A\ Commission
~"'~"-'"4",,_=~
The GMOC implements a
program to preserve and
enhance public services and
quality of life as growth
occurs.
~ ~~~i' '" ~\I~'~';~:;:~'''' ~,~";,:,:;',,,,;(:_'~ ,: ~ '~~";:~,:;~:" :;':' ;:'(~'>,'",;;":",' --;~- ;:' " ,
~~;~' GiowttfMan:a'genienl Oversighf2 . "
~
CC[H]~~O~~ Commission
~~i?
.:. Goa I
.:. Objectives
.:. Threshold Standards
.:. Implementation Measures
. . lID '. :~ci:~ :-';;':' ~,,=- . :~~:::;-:.~~: ';~"'.: ..:?:'.. ':::~'.:.-'-:';:::'~':':':;;: ':: :.~" ',': .-::~.:.. ;. ::: ::
, '. ,.. . ,. . " " ., ." " 'Cffi' "1" '''V' .'t'.".. ..
.] ;..' ,-....' ,.... '.' .'. ..,.....' ,"'c', '. ""u'" 'a" "sa' .." ;""'.
..., '. ."..' '-,.. "1 S .,' ,. "
, :: ~if.ei .,.c.>> ,~;.;.", ~::::/ . ,',", ". ~ .... .'.: ". ';': J':;:.:':,:
4 ~
i ~ 11 Quality of life Indicators
City Control
,__~,",,",.,,0'''t...,4_j:,;:)
External
Fiscal
Library
Parks &
Recreation
Sewer
Drainage
Police
Fire / EMS
Traffic
Water
Air Quality
Schools
GMOC Process
City staff prepares Residential Growth Forecast July - October
-+ City distributes forecast and questionnaires to
departments and agencies
l+ GMOC reviews responses
4 GMOC discusses with City staff and agencies
1>1 .
~q~
~
Oimf (fl;
[JLsiJlJ!e~ ~
^ ~ _ ,- ~ " ..." ........._" . ~^~ '.' ~ -
_', .. _ .'u' . __m_"',
rdwfh:Mifni~~frrJlPPf6~f~rii; .
Review
j
<I
1 The GMOC..
:1
l
.1 .:. Reviewed questionnaires
,
i
1 .:. Discussed threshold standards
11
at retreat and during
Top-to-Bottom review
,"-'.~",,,,
J
ill <~':~" , i.~t;;~~~~it<~~~'M~>,:~:i:?( ~~:cc -.:-~<, - ~:.: 'i~-~;~;;-t;:~':P:~'::'~:~~~'~ :.~::X,:-: .::-: -::' '.E-f
: ~q~' -. raw.'.' anagemen.-- rogram~'
1 ~~ Review
41 . ,:.._.. .., . ",=00ii;itr;:',;,;
.:. Top-to-Bottom:
A Comprehensive Review of the
Chula Vista Growth Management
Program
~b-'-.'.~ .:;,-~, ~~ .:..', ,',', ...>.,:,:; ':;~~," q. ...~.. ....;:....:.:. ..,..-- 'c." .
'; c~!!;/ ~:.G~rowth' 'Ma'rtragenleilt Prtigiam
~
~a R ·
CC~(]J[lAI WU~ e v I e w
,',"h""_"._,~",,,,_
,'--,' ,
. 'U'
e
~ .{ ,,,~z-.,"..d
.:. Includes Review and Amendments
of Four Documents / Components:
· The General Plan Growth Management
Element (Completed in 2005)
· The Growth Management Program
Document;
· The Growth Management Ordinance; and
· Portions of the Threshold Standards
'. .... ,iii
..:kl ',2:.,,""'.._....; 4i1",;;",:,;;,..........;....., ...:,.,.....,.;';.w,;...,.."'~'
-'~~. '.""c"c.;";'.,,,
^ ~. ~ri'~"
~~ ~ !~d..'
~ !t~ U..;"
?' ':;;jij:i;il(
G) ^
~ CD
0 <
--
0 ::J
0 0
:T
Q) ....
-. Z
1
3 CD
Q) --
::J
::J :r.
'''0''.. ."
:""1:".
.::u....+,
"T!'!!
....... "'. .
~.,'
.., .i".
-;>>1
0.,;,.,.'.....
'/';''; "
"""'..,..
;:, .,;.,
, .
~
:.::;:j!:,';,:;'
",..,',,,\-.
. ,',';;;;;i!:
,..,1
, j
I
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
c:;:,',",~'."'.
,2007 THRESHOLD STANDARD -A.NNUAL REVIEVVSUMMARY.
REVIEW PERIOD7/1/06THROUGH6/30/07 '.,
"...........-. ..
1. Fiscal
2. Air Quality
3. Sewer
4. Water
5. Libraries
6. Drainage
7. Parks &
Recreation
x
X
X
'. Adopt/Fund
Tactics to
Achieve
Com liance'
X
Thr~shold
Potential of
Future Non-
compliance
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Land
Facilities
8. Police
Priority I
Pri ority II
9. Fire/EMS
10. Traffic
11. Schools
CV Elementary X
School District
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Sweetwater Union X
High School District
Isca'
Threshold Standards:
1) The GMOC shall be provided with an annual fiscal impact report which
provides an evaluation of the impacts of growth on the City, both in
terms of operations and capital improvements. This report should
evaluate actual growth over the previous 12-month period, as well as
projected growth over the next 12- to l8-month period, and 5-year
period.
2) The GMOC shall be provided with an annual Development Impact Fee
CDIF) Report, which provides an analysis of development impact fees
collected and expended over the previous l2-month period.
Threshold Finding.: In Compliance
~.." ...
===-~
~~
<~
CJIj)f@F
!D}[IUIlA VI~"",
Isca
3.1.1 Maintenance of Development Impact Fees COIF)
Issue:
Reallocating collected monies within the Public Facilities DIF Fund to
self-finance different projects for which the monies were not
intended has left the City with an inability to meet certain threshold
standards.
~
: ~fii,c":;;;':~,'M~t;;';,y
jj ~"
fJ ~
;# OiU'\'fCItF
I ~WWh
. :;1
;;~
j
: . ~l
~
'l !k
;J
d
J
ifu
~
I
,,4
~
Isca
3.1.1 Maintenance of Development Impact Fees COIF)
Discussion:
There has been no apparent accountability in repaying borrowed
funds for their intended use.
Monies earmarked for Libraries were used for other projects within
the Public Facilities DIF. With no repayment scheduled at this time,
the City is unable to meet the threshold standard and construct the
Rancho del Rey library.
iIffi]1f OOF
I[[}-'JLJ[1A W{l;ill~
Isca
3.1.1 Maintenance of Development Impact Fees DIF)
Recommendation:
A comprehensive plan for repayment of funds needs to be established
for inter-fund reallocating that occurs within the Public Facilities DIF
fund.
Staff Response:
Although the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee includes
numerous projects, it is managed as a pooled fund. A comprehensive
cash flow analysis of the fund has been developed and all remaining
PFDIF projects have been incorporated into fee structure. Revenue
projections through build-out indicate the current fee structure is
sufficient to fund all remaining projects in the PFDIF.
lCIJiJ'1f (t1~
lClHIlUILA WNA
~
"~~__~______'~~="~_~'_M_"'~^'M''''''_''''''''
Threshold Standards:
The GMOC shall be provided with an Annual Report which:
1. Provides an overview and evaluation of local development projects
approved during the prior year to determine to what extent they
implemented measures designed to foster air quality improvement
pursuant to relevant regional and local air quality improvement
strategies.
2. Identifies whether the City's development regulations, policies, and
procedures are consistent with current applicable federal, state,
and regional air quality regulations and programs.
3. Identifies non-development related activities being undertaken by
the City toward compliance with relevant federal, state, and local
regulations regarding air quality, and whether the City has achieved
compliance.
'I" '~~~~2::~~C:';;~iihJtltR'CfiJ~BTv;;;&~?;';:jt"~.....,:.
;1
<;Ll
'M
!
]1
I
%
'f
, il
:;
1
;/
'Q
I Threshold Finding: In Compliance
,1/
,j
, ',~
ij!
,~il
'j
I~'~
IHI,,1
,... '~
j
1
,. .......
- . .. -..,
""" ,
The City shall provide a copy of said report to the Air Pollution Control
District (APCD) for review and comment. In addition, the APCD shall
report on overall regional and local air quality conditions, the status of
regional air quality improvement implementation efforts under the
Regional Air Quality Strategy and related federal and state programs,
and the affect of those efforts/programs on the City of Chula Vista and
local planning and development activities.
During the period under review, the City exceeded state smog
standards only two days and federal standards one day, while the San
Diego Region exceeded state standards 21 days and federal standards
8 days. As in previous years, Chula Vista continues to be a leader in
implementing local measures and programs that contribute to
pollution reduction and air quality improvement.
t-~~~~~'~
:'
3.2.1 Chula Vista Development Procedures
Regarding Federal, State and Regional
Air Quality Regulations and Programs
Issue:
The City should enforce Section 20.04 (1982) of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code, which states that: All new residential units shall
include plumbing specifically designed to allow the later installation
of a system which utilizes solar energy as the primary means of
heating domestic potable water.
",,' . .. .. -- . .. .-' ,- . . '. .. - - ~
- ^~^~"""'""C^~'-~^'^^'^^'"_7':'^^"C'--"'A^' "^'I'R'^""Q^'lJ+ :A-" - "[C~'"^I-T'y-:- "....H:^^:~^._ ^
~ ---- .--. --. ^
~
carmt OOF
iOJiJUllA \\IIlSIJ;'),
,
4-
il
3.2.1 Chula Vista Development Procedures
Regarding Federal, State and Regional
Air Quality Regulations and Programs
Discussion:
Residential solar hot water systems reduce the burning of fossil
fuels for home water heating, thus reducing emissions of
greenhouse gases and criteria air pollutants. The California Energy
Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission aims to
make all new residential homes carbon neutral (i.e., no emissions
from electricity or gas use) by 2020. It is expected that energy
codes will become much stricter over the next decade in order to
meet the carbon neutral goal.
o . ~~i'..~~~,;")lijiu;'~"AI\R '\Q;"~"-(JJt[rTf \.'~t~{:,'5!l;'b;:'i ..~....... .~
I[)}{JU];'\ W~
3.2.1 Chula Vista Development Procedures
Regarding Federal, State and Regional
Air Quality Regulations and Programs
Recommendation:
In order to comply with CVMC 20.04, the City needs to inform
applicants of this requirement in the early stages of the development
process, and make sure building inspectors verify installation of these
systems during final inspections.
Staff Response:
This is currently being enforced. Building inspectors and plans
Examiners have received training and applicants are being informed at
Plan check. It is now a plan check correction item.
~ "..." l
.;;.~~~>;;}":; :;;~>'>:;,,:;..:;~::;.'~:':~ :;,;.;, .;:;;;;::: :":>7:,':. ;}.:;t;;(;~;.;;;;;,:;., ;;~,;); ,,;,;,;;:;;:';~~';";;"..:. ;;,: "11
~.. ~'''--''---''-'-AI'R 'Q'O" ALITY ,~_......,..._~. .. .... .";
<DHJUIIA WIlW'I.
.-
"~-'~~--"
3.2.2 City Programs for Air Quality Improvement
Issue:
Chula Vista needs to maintain satisfactory air quality and reduce air
pollutants in the Chula Vista area.
~ . "-"--. -q
, ru '-"'~I~~:~';T~lIJti;,~~~\'L,: ~~~r:,,::~:;~t":;:'".'~:;CC.""E.;1;:t......,;~~{. , '~~~L~ .... '..~t~.i;, >.';;J~.:. '::;;~~~c,'::.':,;t~}y;~:c,:{~' ~l
~_c___ .----c.-----AI R--a-O].\LITY--- n ~---_.- . h"
<DHILm.,^ ~
3.2.2 City Programs for Air Quality Improvement
Discussion:
To improve local and regional air quality, the City of Chula Vista
continues to implement several of the Action Measures in the Carbon
Dioxide (C02) Reduction Plan, adopted by Council in November 2000,
and conservation efforts related to the City's "Energy Strategy,"
adopted in 2001, to lower energy consumption and emissions.
Following are some non-development related air quality programs
that the City is currently implementing or participating in:
<GW<Il'
ClHfU[\i" V~A
- .p .".--.. -..-
3"Ji..lcR'::ao~EfTy~~\"2~", L ~2'
3.2.2 City Programs for Air Quality Improvement
South Bay Power Plant Removal
To reduce 2.3 million pounds of pollutants, the City is researching
options to remove the plant. Even if it were replaced, a new plant
would produce at least 200/0 less pollution than the current plant
and greatly improve Chula Vista's air quality levels.
Energy Conservation Program
The City is in its second year of a 3-year program with SDG&E to
promote energy efficiency throughout the community, resulting in
better air quality. The program includes exchanging FREE
Compact Fluorescent Lights and Pre-Rinse Spray Valves (food
service facilities only) for older, inefficient models to businesses
and residences.
jj "~~~"~~c-'"- ;-~~<_~~;:,::~~>~i:;",,~~~:~' :c:~:~~:;~i;;",;;:,~~,~:t." ,~;;':.:,~;:,., :~~'-:,~_.~:'~,,~;~; ":;,,
~~'- __'n~~ - .. A'I R"-~Q'IJALITY---"--._--'
. ~
><{,.> .',': ,. ';
.-... . ,.
c....,. "
..-.::---.,-,. ""
3.2.2 City Programs for Air Quality Improvement
The program is also working to promote energy-efficiency remodels
and new construction by modeling the energy impacts of several
design alternatives for two new urban infill projects.
Urban Shade Tree Program
Shade trees help mitigate the Urban Heat Island Effect and improve
air quality by removing C02, dust and other particulates. Through a
grant from the California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection,
over 1,200 shade trees will be planted along residential streets,
canyon parkways, and within community parks and will increase the
air quality benefits associated with urban forests. To date, 180 trees
have been planted with the help of 100 volunteers. The estimated
carbon reduction from the program is 2,340 pounds C02 per year.
lIE!
~ ~~ ~.,:;~ ~ ;. :i.~~." .
~
<<:u11'if0ClF
iDHlU\If), W~
t~~}'? ~iX2:;; '-i;"~;'<~ '.~' :~.;;"~~':~ ~ ,,~~'h~':':'~~; .<t.~i~"::'::;,;. .;':"i:";;~;;:" : ".'l':, . :>.~ .,!~
..=~- -~-"AIR' QUA[ITY --..~~. -~--._~- -. .,
3.2.2 City Programs for Air Quality Improvement
Alternative Fuel Vehicles
Vehicles using Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), hydrogen, and
electricity have been incorporated into the municipal
fleet. Recently, the City has been pursuing funds to reduce NOx
emissions by 50010 in the transit fleet by using a blend of hydrogen
and CNG. In addition, the City is launching a new Nature Center
shuttle bus which showcases hydrogen internal combustion engine
(H2ICE) technology.
The City continues to seek funding to upgrade a CNG fuel
dispenser at the Public Works Yard to accommodate the growing
public demand for a convenient CNG fueling station. Presently, the
nearest public CNG dispenser is 15 miles from the South Bay area.
... - . --.- --- --.
~!["'i";;l'i~i~'i"~1f5'iAIR "au " [TTy",''':JIr,A ,~~":
3.2.2 City Programs for Air Quality Improvement
Climate Change Actions
On April 1, 2008, City Council adopted seven climate change actions
presented by the City's Climate Change Working Group. These
actions will help the City meet, or make the most progress towards
meeting its ICLEljKyoto commitment of reducing citywide
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 200/0 below 1990 levels.
" ~ ,.~, . """""'"'''I~''~''''Y'"''''''d''~'''I'A''' "I' 'R' """'Q '(J'" '''JS.''''''['=I''TV'' 1.....'"''-"'"''''''' " ..........., ..,,',. II' .~, '.1'
~.~ .. -.. __ ^ _....... . _._,,___ _ . _.. ., . u. _,
. ~ .
.~ 00 OOF
, <OKII..lIY\\Wo:w""
+
tl
3.2.2 City Programs for Air Quality Improvement
Recommendation:
1) The City shall continue to vigorously implement its Carbon
Dioxide (C02) Reduction Plan, Energy Strategy and Climate
Change Actions.
Staff Response:
1) On April 1, 2008 City Council adopted all seven recommendations
presented by the City's Climate Change Working Group in order
to further reduce the community's greenhouse gas emissions or
"carbon footprint. "
=""
~n~
~~- 'q-^~,'. ~---
AlFrauAtlTY;c".
3.2.2 City Programs for Air Quality Improvement
Recommendation:
2) The City Council, as it follows up with the City's Climate Change
Working Group, shall develop options for devising an air quality
threshold standard that would serve as an appropriate measuring
device.
Staff Response
2) Staff is now working to develop detailed implementation plans for the
seven measures which will promote alternative fuel/hybrid vehicle use;
establish a green building standard for new construction and major
remodels; expand renewable energy and energy efficiency opportunities
for residents and businesses; require business energy assessments;
Promote "smart growth" around trolley stations; and encourage the
use of water-wise landscaping and irrigation throughout the community.
:. ~<~i&.':1;'l~r {~{ ji'<,)'i']l)1't'i'~"':?~wP:fi"R:'j'l)"ic~'~'~3'l),::';;;'" 1J;,
<D.HJiJ\1t!\~
~
"m,,_ ....,._.
\';Y': ..:r,;;~;,,, L
--"'." - ---~.,
. ,...... "'-C.",,',,-,
- ~_.. , "
.-, ~ -".~-
Threshold Standards:
1. Developer will request and deliver to the City a service availability
letter from the Water District for each project.
2. The City shall annually provide the San Diego County Water
Authority, the Sweetwater Authority, and the Otay Municipal
Water District with a 12-18 month development forecast and
request evaluation of their ability to accommodate the forecast
and continuing growth. The districts' replies should address the
following:
a. Water availability to the City and Planning Area, considering both
short and long term perspectives.
b. Amount of current capacity, including storage capacity, now used or
committed.
c. Ability of affected facilities to absorb forecast growth.
d. Evaluation of funding and site availability for projected new facilities.
e. Other relevant information the Districts desire to communicate to the
City and GMOC.
.",'i Fl
J . ~~:,'g">li:I,~.E,~::"~f,:,~SiWATER:j50;fc"f'::J,"~ .;;..k1:~
. ,
Threshold Finding: In Compliance
Both the Otay Water District (OWD) and Sweetwater Authority
(SWA) have indicated that they will be able to meet Chula Vista's
water demand for the 12 - 18 month period, and for the next five
years.
)
<<:%l:f((lJ
iCIHIIJ);" ~"
..~~~ -- ~
B"WjTE;R{f:':::"l];~~:::':;S'A. -,
3.2.2 Emergency Water SUQJJly
Issue:
Provision of water supply during a catastrophic emergency.
~~:::t, :~:e:: ~:;f~i~~?":: ~i:':,,"~-~;w,:~;~,: ':A-l: ::{Ti:' ;'E~";~~R-::l~'Cc'~f~;, :":_L:"':~::~);,~ _3::~_', :';' "l
~ .
(QJ1I'1f(j)}'
((J}{)lJJA wu:m~
3.2.2 Emergency Water SUQply
Discussion:
Both of the major water districts serving the City of Chula Vista, the
Otay Water District and the Sweetwater Authority, report that they
will be able to meet the water demands in case of a catastrophic
emergency. State law requires that an emergency supply of up to
two years be available for water company customers.
, I
' r "" ,
:: iI " ,:;;'~ql?k '~.,' ~'::;':~,~:J.:,"Y:';7C,C,"}:, .;~;~::::~,::",,:~;;,t.6,;};::' ,,::,:::,;:;,: ;;:"',;':": ":::-'::::1 ,:';:~:: :c::;';,:C:>",:"i',.' . "'):', ,::' ",; ':; :;:: i
~ Y" ,,--' .'..,..'". '"'' ,'" ""..' 'W" A' ~-TE'R"-'--" """ --", " ,~
' , ~ h ..... '__",' ."" '..,
~
~ t0111\foor
1 ~Wl~
. I
, 'l
,,;;;.,
iL
;~.
3.4.2 Emergency Water Su~ly
Recommendation:
That GMOC continue to support the Otay Water District and
Sweetwater Authority and their water emergency policies.
Staff Response:
Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District continue to
pursue and maintain emergency water supply needs
consistent with the recommendations of the San Diego
County Water Authority.
- -
i~::~:":!r~jf;'~DRA1N)((iEr"'~'':!'';'''''''5\;'J'':2i';~~"i,~' I
Threshold Standards:
1. Storm water flows and volumes shall not exceed City
Engineering standards.
2. The GMOC shall annually review the performance of the City's
storm drain system to determine its ability to meet that goal.
Threshold Finding: In Compliance
Storm water flows and volumes during the reporting period were
within City engineering standards.
lQiW'@J'
iQ}{J]J1lf\ ~h
.'0'
. Ci~"~ ''Zc:'ORAi iQlGE..;t'~; c,~"?t
3.6.1 Maintenance of Existing Drainage System
Issue:
.
For channels that require permits from environmental resource
agencies before maintenance can be conducted, it is necessary to
develop acceptable channel maintenance procedures and obtain
appropriate environmental permits.
l U U U u'
: ~~~' <,"~,'~~:~~ ~",~ ~~D"RJ.\I-r\J1\G~E~~=u~~~~=":u~~u~:=-,
,
3.6.1 Maintenance of Existing Drainage System
Discussion:
The City currently participates in a regional work group that has
been established to develop channel maintenance procedures that
are acceptable to resource agencies and facilitate obtaining
environmental permits for channel maintenance from resource
agencies. This is important because obtaining permits for channel
maintenance is a time-consuming and costly process; and in some
cases, there may be conflicting requirements from different
resource agencies.
. r.:~;;it~";!!ifJ;;;ft;i(...jfsi"[t;RJ(f'~")(GE:J~};;\1I1i;;1.;r,$i;'2;~; ,,;,;11 .. !~
~
The City should continue to participate in the Regional Channel
Maintenance Workgroup subcommittee, as the group's consultant
continues to work with environmental resource agencies in
streamlining a process for obtaining environmental permits.
Staff Response:
The Regional Channel Maintenance Workgroup subcommittee has
received statements of support from RWQCB, ACOE, Fish and
Wildlife, and Coastal Commission. Fish and Game's counsel has
reviewed the Permitting Guide and is submitting minor comments
to EDA W for inclusion in the Guide. EDA W will then provide a
final white paper, and the final Permitting Guide to the Workgroup.
. ;
It" ~\!~ili;,,;;:;; ; i'" :;;1~;' '~}D'" '.~~~R~ '~'A""; >:~i.~I;~'N~':3.;':~A'~~~ "G' . <~-, 'E:tC; -,:" ;?~:~,~j.~ ,~jt~ : ~::.} · . -~<..' .>~
l ~ .
, lO!1fi:1(j{f
~~ WItm~
.' ,
3.6.2 Funding for Future Facilities Required to
Accommodate 5-Year Growth Forecast
Issue:
General impacts on developed areas in western Chula Vista may
need to be funded by the City.
J(1 , , ~'. u
: -"e:'~q~"~">".::~:~:> :"''-':':'ic,,:,:~:~5,.:r::'" .... ;";::< ',::Z>"J;; . '';'.: ):,.-:::,:,. .:.~" -::,';'::;'~ :;:.F.;':,..":~:.( ,:.f':.:.' ,'..~;::. ,
j Qit------ _d_ D-RAINAGE-----.-------~
;,
j
3.6.2 Funding for Future Facilities Required to
Accommodate 5-Year Growth Forecast
Discussion:
There may not be sufficient funds in the DIF to finance all the
improvements needed in the Telegraph Canyon Basin. General
impacts on developed areas may need to be funded by the City.
Insufficient facilities and/or funds could result in an increased
potential for flooding, for collapse of corroded CMP, and for erosion.
For the City's NPDES program, it could result in impairment of water
quality within receiving waters and create a condition of non-
compliance with the Municipal Permit, exposing the City to penalties.
~Ilj. "~~'~M~c..
~i;f;,
. . ~-
~
(('[fffif(jJF
~~
cO'll?bRAIN1tG E:'~':""c'
3.6.2 Funding for Future Facilities Required to
Accommodate 5-Year Growth Forecast
Recommendation:
Through local, state and/or federal monies, the City should be
prepared to fund any shortfalls associated with construction of new
and/or improvements to existing drainage facilities.
Staff Response:
The City continues to seek funding from state and/or federal
agencies to augment local funds.
""~"-"_:2c-P:6J~KS';O&RECRE:(Tl0'N "',, '. -. ~~
<CIHlIJ\;" ~"
Threshold Standards:
Three acres of neighborhood and community parkland with
appropriate facilities shall be provided per 1,000 residents east
of I-80S.
Threshold Finding: In Compliance
land: Actual: 3.59 acres per 1,000 residents east of I-80S
Facilities:
The threshold standard requires that the requisite parkland (3 acres per
1,000 residents east of I-80S) be outfitted "with appropriate facilities".
During the period under review, the facilities sited within the requisite
park acreage are consistent with the types of facilities identified in the
City's Park and Recreation Master Plan.
'~~';'?~2L:p' RKS"g ':REcREAltOr'f .
<CIHlU1Y~ WgA
a
R
. -.'iJ
3.7.2 Threshold Standard Chang~
Issue:
The Parks & Recreation threshold standard should be changed to
address new growth, citywide.
Discussion:
· Existing Threshold Standard
3 acres per 1,000 residents east of 1-805; which is being met by new
development east of 1-805
· Need for Change
The General Plan indicates that new development west of 1-805 will
result in over 28,000 new residents by build-out; this will require over
84 acres of new parks for "new" residents west of 1-805; thus, an
expanded threshold is needed to monitor that.
,. ~fj , '. "-'~q~"'.4l$;(~c:'y'!!~':" " .0SJt..f .;. :'cyJ~t,; :,>".;;~:,'.i?'[~' ..:..;)~(:..'~j~;'i;;:;;;.'{!;'iif?;:!;::';~;.;':'.;0;1'; " . .:j4;2.....
I ~"C"~-'PARKS"g~RECR'E~Tror\r
~ <D'rt/Ul;" ~
{I
J
:il
.. -"- .-
,c';<:,"'. '
". ~
,""C'- ..:;,
,.--.-.:.- 'I
"-- ~---.,--,.: "'. ,
3.7.2
Threshold Standard Chang~
· Proposed Threshold Standard Change
3 acres per 1,000 "new" residents, citywide, recognizing new
growth west of 1-805
· Proposed New Policy
Adopt a policy that requires that park funding for new development
west of 1-805 be used only within that area
· Recognition of Existing Conditions West of I-80S
- Existing park ratio west of 1-805 is currently 1.15 acres per 1,000 residents.
- It would take funding necessary to construct 97 additional acres west of
1-805 to achieve a citywide ratio of 3 acres per 1,000 residents that wouldn't
come from new development.
- It is not fiscally feasible to call for a citywide parks & recreation threshold
that would be non-compliant for many years to come, if not indefinitely.
";; ~~~~,:~: ~tc;~~";';? c;,:,;_ '\:';:~: ~cc::::"r~':~~ ";/"~;-c: }~';'iiC":2ii;; T"; ;;~;.:!ii':;;_;:;~7;';; ;~;,_~;,;;;; . ,L; ",;;:,i:.; jiJ
~"~=i'-PARKS~"'&REC-REA TION"---'"' 4
COHl!JJ~ Wl~
3.7.2 Threshold Standard Chang~
Solution
- If parks for new growth is to be accommodated appropriately west
of I-80S;
- If new parks are to be provided in sync with this growth;
- If the city will ever make strides towards increasing its overall per
capita ratio of parks west of I-80S;
THEN, adopt a revised Parks and Recreation Master Plan that contains or
calls for subsequent adoption of a strategic financing/implementation plan
for new parks and recreation facilities in the west.
. .'~,:,j~~~P1(R'f{S~~&~REeR~'~Tfoft;~'51iS .. i~
. (Q}-:J!.MI WThSIJi\\
:1
1
3.7.2 Threshold Standard Chang~
Recom mendation:
1) As part of the Top-to-Bottom review, the Parks & Recreation
threshold standard should be amended to read: "Three acres of
park land, with appropriate facilities, shall be provided per 1,000
residents for new development Citywide."
Staff Response:
1) Staff concurs with proposed amended language.
~~ ~~q ~~
~ <~~~~~ ~~~~ y~~ ~ ,~,
~=~ ~~~~~~~"~
~E:+E+;':::O-';;"::..o
~
<DJIl'\f!j1F
~ mr,~
._ ..... .......,...., .......d.. ... .....,
plR~~g~~;REcllE"J(TY~t~r"~;cc.
3.7.2 Threshold Standard Changg
Recommendation:
2) A City policy should be adopted that requires that all new
parks developed with funding from new residential growth west
of Interstate 805 be developed within this area.
Staff Response:
2) Staff will look into the feasibility and practicality of being able to
do this.
lj ~ ~ ,., ,c "".;;" 'C"". "~"'Y ,"."~~r:; 'i '"": :'''~' .,,;;;;;. ;,:,...." ,;,w.." ,." ~,", y': ,,',cc,,: '~t' :;", "{.' . ~.iO""i~' ~" .":' . '1
: ~"'~~~'-""~~PJ(RKS~&'j--R7Et-RE-AtrO-f\.f'~:-- :'L_~
, ~ W\rnij~
. "
3.7.3 Providing Park and Recreation Facilities
in Western Chula Vista
Issue:
There is a need for additional recreational facilities in western Chula
Vista, and for acquiring land and funding for Construction to meet
the needs for new residential population.
; lw" :!f~t.t~;;PP:RKS;i~RECRE~T'it)~t"ttt.L .,)~
!I
- ~
J
'Jill
.. ~
n
1."
~
it
Jl
m
J
'~
:+\
i
'~
'....1
"
!.:l
3.7.3 Providing Park and Recreation Facilities
in Western Chula Vista
Discussion:
The internal draft Parks and Recreation Master Plan document includes a
focused discussion on park delivery in western (hula Vista. Strategies for
future western (hula Vista parkland development include developing
parks on public agency controlled lands, developing parks on
underutilized and vacant lands suitable for parks, and developing parks of
varying sizes and character (community, neighborhood, and urban parks)
that demonstrably meet defined recreational needs. Future recreational
needs in western (hula Vista can be addressed by individually and or
collectively applying these strategies.
" !U." ~q~';}f':
. ~
<<::rrmtcJ1F
iCI}{Jl.I\1,~W~
- . -
PA'RKS~&'{REC~RE~Tior\r
, 1
..""
,
3.7.3 Providing Park and Recreation Facilities
in Western Chula Vista
Recom mendation:
The City shall develop new models and approaches for meeting
recreational land and facility needs in developed western Chula Vista,
and a plan for acquisition and funding of land and facilities.
Staff Response:
The draft update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan includes a
new chapter on park delivery in western Chula Vista that addresses
new models and approaches.
"~7~', ~~t?t:"7"-;"'>:- '7::'~/'~~:>>-, 'L,. :iY','" ':, --:::, .::",:~:',.,;, <:,:,<,_:,--,:,_ >-~~_~;:_7'S,:,,-~,,_-:,-~:,--:::';,:-:i?",:.',~-:i.h:;:, _:::":-" .';' -:" ',:,;7-" - ,i '.;, '; .,
~-~*7~'P:A::RkS~:_i&-R;EC-REA tlO'r\J'- 'L',_ ,'-.,~
(Q}{](UUfi, WD~'!,
3.7.4 Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Issue:
Updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan is still incomplete.
([1flTIf el)}
iDYillJl~ W1151fh
3.7.4 Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Discussion:
An internal draft of the update to the Parks and Recreation Master
Plan has been completed and has been reviewed by legal staff.
Parks and Recreation staff is currently addressing legal comments.
The document maintains consistency with the established General
Plan policy pertaining to providing 3 acres of parkland per 1,000
persons for new residential development, citywide.
The GMOC requests the opportunity to review updated studies and
plans that address how future park land and facility needs will be
addressed in western Chula Vista, including the updated Parks and
Recreation Master Plan.
l~-~:~.t~~~~~~ --~~ .,~
~ (ClHtUi1RI 'WWA
"
I
1i
:1
1
Lj
3.7.4 Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Recommendation:
A draft of the updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan shall be
made available for review by the GMOC as part of its next (2009)
annual review cycle.
Staff Response:
The draft Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update will be made
available to the GMOC as soon as a public draft becomes available.
:'~:"i"~~;-r~~:~~.2>;5~;~" ...f5.~.~::;- . .~~:'~~~_\;-~;L;.iC~;;~i:~)~;i...~,;~~.s~{: .f;~':_~..~5~.~' ..:j'{{; ':: ;1.;; '" H.'~_:. '-.:1~
~ FIRE I EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
<OHlUllA WIlmA
Threshold Standard:
Emergency response: Properly equipped and staffed fire and
medical units shall respond to calls throughout the city within
seven (7) minutes in 800/0 (current service to be verified) of the
cases (measured annually).
Threshold Finding: In Compliance
mV<l1F
~ WlliWt\\
FIRE I EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
3.9.2 Fire Facilities Master Plan and Advance Life
SUlWort Study
Issue:
The Fire Facilities Master Plan and Advance Life Support Study
(ALS) are complete but have not been brought to City Council for
review and approval.
=<f1F
<[J}{JUl!A ~A
FIRE I EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
3.9.2 Fire Facilities Master Plan and Advance Life
SUQ.Port Study
Discussion:
Existing facilities, staffing and equipment may not be sufficient to
accommodate forecasted growth for the next five years if major
projects such as the Bayfront Master Plan, Urban Core Specific Plan
and the University move forward. The impact of this development
is addressed in the Fire Facilities Master Plan.
([Ji1Rf@}
iOHIlJJllA W05lfA
FIRE I EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
3.9.2 Fire Facilities Master Plan and Advance Life
SUI2Port Study
Recommendation:
The Fire Facilities Master Plan and Advance Life Support Study
should be brought to City Council for review and action during the
upcoming GMOC review cycle so that fire and emergency response
issues related to future growth can be addressed.
Staff Response:
The Fire Facility Master Plan has been completed. The Fire
Department will be working with the city Manager to develop an
implementation strategy. The Fire Department and City Manager
will report back to the GMOC any significant developments.
'l
ITf
!it
I
~
~I
m
~
m
~
:7
l
!
,j
!i!
.. ~.~
~~ q
. ~;
,
. t
d
"f
~\
I
. ^ _. ..~..,.
~- FIRE I EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
~~'"
3.9.2 Outsourcing Dispatch System to San DiegQ
Issue:
The GMOC is concerned that meeting the threshold standard will
be negatively affected by outsourcing Chula Vista's emergency
dispatch system.
m,,~
<<:iHill~ WIl~f~
FIRE I EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
3.9.2 Outsourcing Dispatch System to San DiegQ
Discussion:
Since March 2008, fire and medical dispatch calls for Chula Vista have
been handled by dispatchers in San Diego, an arrangement that is
supposed to save money and improve response times to emergency
calls. However, the GMOC believes that meeting the threshold
standard has been directly affected by the City having its own
dispatch center.
<<lJ11lf<l1F
CCJ}{JUJ]A WiY5lfA
FIRE I EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
3.9.2 Outsourcing Dispatch System to San DiegQ
Recommendation:
The Fire Chief shall furnish the GMOC with data on response and
calls for service after the transition to San Diego dispatch.
Staff Response:
This data will be furnished to the GMOC when the transition to
San Diego Dispatch has been completed and enough call for service
volume can be analyzed for comparison purposes.
l~ < ~;~ii;t:i'~'~<:,i;f"'<<:,<;\'R'Ci: ,~~it1'<<">'\:~^ ,,~~, < ,,;:,:;c,'< ~,ill:;':,,' "f\C;;,::~4;;' ;;;k< <dfu~" ; J',:, < <;,
1,1 ,~ ~ .'-- ... ." ~"~~'-"'S~C'ROO~[S"-- L,=~,... ='=='-'" .
. ~ WI!W~
:1
~
Threshold Standards:
The City of Chula Vista shall annually provide the two local school districts
Chula Vista Elementary School District (CVESD) and Sweetwater Union School
District (SUHSD), with a 12-18 month forecast and request an evaluation of
their ability to accommodate the forecasted and continuing growth. The
Districts' replies should address the following:
1. Amount of current capacity now used or committed.
2. Ability to absorb forecasted growth in affected facilities.
3. Evaluation of funding and site availability for projected new facilities.
4. Other relevant information the Districts desire to communicate
to the City and GMOC.
0i1I1f<i~
frWIlA WIlm"
~. .~~ ._~- -- ._. -
c:ri!:;~1.;iSC<Ha:'i'6rS"'2"~~:~';!(' c~i"Ji);:'c',i;':";:c,,::cl
Threshold Finding~
CVESD - In Compliance
SUHSD - In Compliance
Comment:
Both school districts indicate that additional facilities will be
required to accommodate growth in the next five years, and that
they will be constructed when funding is available.
,
. . Ei .- --.
~~~_ii,i'1';: ';;~'''""iii:';', 'c'J"~C:RtlO tg'~:";;",,,;"~",, ,'C;;,c:,~,',
~. ~,. ~
. ... .
- ... ~ ..
Sweetwater Union High School District
· A grade 7-12 campus is planned for Otay Ranch
Village 11 within the next five years.
· Proposition 0 passage will allow the District to continue
modernization and limited new construction efforts on the
west side. Capacity exists currently on the east side with the
2006 opening at Olympian High School (High School 13).
A campus for grades 7-12 has completed design and will
complete DSA approval by mid-2008. It is positioned to start
construction, but is not needed until 2010 (projected). The site
has been acquired. Construction on Proposition 0 projects in
2009 will include Hilltop High School, Chula Vista High School
and Chula Vista Middle School.
-
-
~~-"""'-'~'"-'=-"==~'~"S'C-R~O-O-[S----==-=-_u_-__~~n' - -.,
IC!J-{lUlillWiI5IJi"
- Sweetwater Union High School District
· The District has a three-story campus design with grades 7-8 on a
portion of the campus and a 9-12 campus adjacent with shared
service facilities. For Middle School 12jHigh School 14, construction
will commence in 2009, if needed. Site selection, architectural
review, funding identification for land and construction,
commencement of site preparation, and service by utilities and
road have all been completed.
1~ ~"~i~~L::~~(: ",;;"~~;~<
. ~
<<JilFif@j
CiJHJl..I\Y"'I'fm-"
~~ -.;":c?~;~,,:":;'i" 'l~:~~";;:/;:' '~";';<'~~L~t2 .""<c~ : ",';;"-c '" '~:Jt;:;,. '";::1
-_H'-'~"'-S-CFlOO-['S'--'-"P_'_P~---" ""-... ."
Chula Vista School Elementary District
· Additional schools will be constructed in Otay Ranch Villages 2 and
11, as needed to serve students moving into Otay Ranch, and as
state funding becomes available.
· The District has a two-story design planned for the Village 11 school
site. Eventually, it will be used In Village 2 and the Eastern Urban
Center, as well.
e Wolf Canyon Elementary School was constructed and opened in
Otay Ranch Village 7 in July 2007.
- w.., ~q~--:z-;<':"-;~:-:::"~'-.".~7:.';~="":~- :;;;.<._ ~.'=' - --.~=;::~'--,;l"-.- - =~:'"-".~:-';.~.'C":-
~.. '----'.- -------.-.--.SEWE"R= ---.
-:~ 'ij
"'c. "
",/::ct,.:.~
. -- -'-.- -"
-=-';',,-:i, M__ - '-;0,:0""";;"- ~
. ~.~__+__ , ",........;;_..;.;_.2':'fu...~.- _:.._.:i'__~
Threshold Standards:
1. Sewage flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering
Standards (75% of design capacity).
2. The City shall annually provide the San Diego Metropolitan
Wastewater Authority with a 12 to 18-month development forecast and
request confirmation that the projection is within the City's purchased
capacity rights and an evaluation of their ability to accommodate the
forecasted and continuing growth, or the City Public Works Department staff
shall gather the necessary data. The information provided to the GMOC shall
include:
a. Amount of current capacity now used or committed.
b. Ability of affected facilities to absorb forecasted growth.
c. Evaluation of funding and site availability for projected new facilities.
d. Other relevant information.
The growth forecast and Authority response letters shall be provided to the
GMOC for inclusion in its review.
Iii _h - ..
~' '~"~:; :-i1Lz-;:;~ ':~~;,::t~~{i:j~\~'::;F;~:~t sr~n -W~;,*':" ::''"J- "'R:- ':'~:-_i:~',r~;,::7';:;;~~ --. :c,--':::?i,':;,' .J: i!'~"2{": '
", ~
([[[ffif@r
iDHlIJIlAI W~
Threshold Finding: Non-Compliance (#1)
In one instance, City sewage flows and volumes exceeded City
Engineering Standards (750/0 of design capacity).
I" .:I:;;':c"~L'i'~;j~,\g;;t$iSEWER'L.\~?;';!\t~;;~\};JE ; .'. ,,"';~
"
.13.3.1 Non-ComQliant Industrial Boulevard Sewer Line
Issue:
During the period under review, sewage flows and volumes exceeded
City Engineering Standards in a section of the Industrial Boulevard
sewer line, which did not comply with the threshold standard.
'l'l Q. "'".'~~ ~ ';-I:"~'c:~.L<::~;&.!i ~'.~::~~'}':~;"'r':: I';~: i:" 'ft. .,~..,.:;:>: '.:.' ;.:.~'.:::;'~ '~'. '~;~:'i'1;L:!'::' :>f:'::'..':';'" :..:".} .' ~
. ~ ~ .--- -...." ..--.'" '" ., 'S'EW' 'E'R -....., .'- _. ----.--.. _h__'_,,- '.. '''. . .
~-?' .._-. ----....... . . -.
, ~
:; Ofli\f@F
: I(I~ WO~h
,j
,
3.3.1 Non-Compliant Industrial Boulevard Sewer Line
Discussion:
Wastewater Engineering staff determined that flows in a section of
the Industrial Boulevard sewer line near the intersection of Industrial
Boulevard and Main Street exceeds the established threshold; that is
a pipe is more than 750/0 full. The City will be improving the Main
Street Trunk sewer line, which may alleviate the constraints on the
Industrial Boulevard sewer line. After improvements to the Main
Street Trunk sewer line are complete, City staff will re-evaluate the
Industrial Boulevard sewer line constraints to determine if the line
needs to be upsized. Staff will tentatively schedule the Industrial
Boulevard sewer improvements for inclusion in the CIP program for
the next fiscal year, pending the outcome of the analysis.
I __ . _.. . '" .
(~ ". .~qi&.;;.. .: ':,'" ~.~, :~::'~ J:L. .:~";" '.:.: '-. ',":' ....~:.,::;'oo:;.,,'.; .;F~:" '.,.',:: k ".''':. ......;. ~. -:::: 1,::'; ~:
- YO...- . -. -- .. .~. ""S"E'W' ER~' .~. ._.... -----. .. .-.-... .-. '''-'
~ . _.. . . .u .
~
([]li\f<J1J
iCG-ilLM W~
3.3.1 Non-Compliant Industrial Boulevard Sewer Line
Recommendation:
That in 2008/09, the City should complete the required improvements
on the Main Street Trunk sewer line; upon completion, the Industrial
Boulevard sewer line constraints should be re-evaluated. Staff should
tentatively schedule the Industrial Boulevard Sewer improvements for
inclusion in the CIP program for next fiscal year, pending the outcome
of the analysis.
Staff Response:
Plans for the required improvements on Main Street are 90%
complete as of June 2008. Upon completion of these improvements
later this year, the Industrial Boulevard sewer constraints will be re-
evaluated. Staff is tentatively scheduling the Industrial Boulevard
sewer improvements for inclusion in the CIP program for next fiscal
year, pending the outcome of the analysis.
fie, ",~1l1b-7;-,_:,:: "~~::''-::;:"':i ;~,:,::;_-~,:,'7_' -:;:;:.,..c. .;:-;;~: ,:,;".:,:,,_,," '.,-;, "t,,',:::"';' .~
",-,,"'HI'''''' ._, .. -'.., .'. ~ , . "S"EW' E R'-' " '.-'- ....... -" -- . - -. "
~ -- ~.. ---::;-,~.. ...;.:...........,._~'"'._.~_ ...__..A.:=.:.._-...._."_,..3";:.,._<._~... ."'.-.:;.z:......-__= .___ . ,:... ',._.. ~ ___ ,..__w__~~.=.. 'C ,", .-,-"-~...".,,._ __.~.__""_ _ ______ .. .'_~.__.. ,
~
([IJN@? .-
~~
3.3.2 Long-Term Treatment Capacity
Issue:
The City of Chula Vista's entitlement for treatment capacity will
need to increase by 5 Million Gallons per Day (MGD) before
build-out.
, ~ ="'~,,"'"',','" "'''''' ,,- ,,"'" -"~""""'-""~S"E'WE"R""" ", ,,,''',,,---,,,,,,--'''''-''''''-,'''' '" "''''',
OOUIlA W1~1i'I,
I
3.3.2 Long-Term Treatment Capacity
Discussion:
The 2005 Wastewater Master Plan indicated that Chula Vista's
treatment capacity would need to be able to accommodate an
additional five Million Gallons per Day (MGDs) to facilitate the City's
5-year build-out. Additional capacity could be provided in either of
two ways:
1. Construction of an independent treatment facility; or
2. Purchase of additional treatment capacity rights from other
agencies in the Metro system.
~~;~~~:' .
~
([[ITI'\f('1f
iOHlUfu\\ W~
"" "'. ....... . , . .....H...... . ',''''... ... ',.,'.. . _,_,.'-" .. ._.,.,...- .... ........
...7:::;;.:,s,,: s":~:;E' ..i'::'-:W:"f ~. "''-E':''"'R..,<:!.:.~...,:t :~1;~:' ":; "C ::~~<~~,,:
. _,__ _'u,----:- _ ,'___ .
3.3.2 Long-Term Treatment Capacity
Treatment Facility - The City's Joint Feasibility Study with Otay
Water District and Sweetwater Authority determined it would be
feasible for the City to build a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR)
Wastewater Reclamation Plant if Otay Water District agreed to take
the recycled water generated. This would negate the need for
Chula Vista to acquire additional treatment capacity from Metro.
Staff is currently re-verifying their long-term market demand
projections with Otay Water District, and is discussing funding/grant
options with the County Water Authority, State Water Resources
Control Board, etc.
,":S ,:v" " ....." ....... .'.~' ..' - -.. . '=-' ...... -'~'~S' E" 'W" 'E. . R' -"'~ ..... "... ,,~..,. -..=..-' -.-- "".' ... '.
~ - -_....~ --,., -. -. .. - "
~ ."
~"~
<Dill1f@i'
I\.JHJIJIIA 'W3)iJfi:\
3.3.2 Long-Term Treatment Capacity
Purchase of Additional Treatment Capacity Ri~ - Currently,
City staff is negotiating acquisition of additional capacity rights with
the City of San Diego. Within the next few months, staff anticipates
a final acquisition price. At that point the City would be in a position
to decide on whether to pay that price or begin the process of
building its own treatment plant.
:~ tIi -, "'~~U[t,ie;7';. ~;;.:;.' __:~ _, -~?-i~cc:~2~ '-,,;r,<-;...._~~.-::~;:: ..'i::F~ 0!;[i,::;,~::-'i';;-~:b.;~~~"'..;.~..::J~~. ')~.E.c1f~:<'(A-; it
.:~.. --~_. - --.~---._-~~._-_. .. 5 EW E-R -.--.--. ..h -- ... -. d - '. ,
GIlUI1A wg"
3.3.2 Long-Term Treatment Capacity
Recom mendation:
By fall 2009, Council should adopt a plan to substantially begin the
process of increasing additional capacity that will needed by 2017.
Staff Response:
Staff has been coordinating the effort to evaluate all available options
that would enable the City Council to make an informed decision on
the best course of action. Staff will bring an action plan for Council
consideration prior to the fall of 2009.
. i () , .",'-. ~iff;d"""~.'" .'i;~;.C .i'7~"',.,,\1;,..., }7~..,.,:'."'i;::;:j.~:t'..rfi'y",';::~};',J;':&/':'~' .!. '.z:~.:, ,.~
, ~.. ..",..~_.,..,.,., .,.,' "pa'['ICE"'-~'
1 <<JJ-ilLJ[LA W05iJ""
~ - """""-
~ .' ..- -- -.' '.
. '_~n .." __
'''',,,_.,';' __"_.,:,,,.c_',
"".:",_ .-'0'
Threshold Standards:
Priority I
Emergency Response: Properly equipped and staffed police units
shall respond to 81 % of the Priority I emergency calls throughout
the City within seven (7) minutes and shall maintain an average
response time to all Priority I calls of five minutes and thirty
seconds (5.5 minutes) or less (measured annually).
Priority II
Urgent Response: Properly equipped and staffed police units shall
respond to 570/0 of the Priority II urgent calls throughout the City
within seven (7) minutes and shall maintain an average response
time to all Priority II calls of seven minutes and thirty seconds (7.5
minutes) or less (measured annually).
.' 'i
~,
~~l8fr
~'h:,_,,;<I'. -_~~~~~
"0 "0
-r
-. -r
0 -.
0
..,
-. .,
I"t' -.
I"t'
t-f 1-1
t-I
. .
..
z
o
::l
I
n
o
:3
""0
QJ'
::l
n
CD
1--1
::l
n
o
:3
""0
QJ'
::l
n
CD
-I
:::r
.,
ro
(f)
:::r
o
-
0..
."
-.
:J
0..
-.
:J
. .
t::'i
1.1 iJ~
;,; ,.,
Ijii~!
iJ;:;i:t;;f'
,;::~
j!\;:}',:,
!lij,:'!:IH,
,.,,:;';::
l~:i:j'i;; ,
If:::::;:~-'
1J;~"!-
!,giW!j-jt
'0:;:,1'1
,..:."
t,T-
l::,> ,
~d;''1''-1
mL,':,i:.:';
f ,,,
~,-;'" .
-c....:,'...,'
,',:<,',1
:.- -",
0,'
,.' ~'-" .
- 'wn;.'
.,'
Ii"~,
l:iYH4,
I ."
;-,-.'
."i. '.
^:::'::Ii
'- ,.:;:;WL,
m,:j.!,
t;;'!'
"",.1
~(' -"
U;i;i;;Jl
i:"
r ."1
t:;j~,;,::
1;<I'i:ij;'
I
I
II
I5.i .' ."
: ,. "'~;'~~"'~"':i~'!"!'~~f":'XcpU rlc'E';J'w':\!"; .,?~:,. ,.~,,,~,;.:~, 0,11;:;.:;;' ~
i1J}{)IJ1y."W~
3.8.2 Non-Compliance of Priority II Threshold
Issue:
Priority II calls continue to be in non-compliance with the threshold
standard.
J11I~yt';'i~~':p6[lei~tr'~~~
. CD:KlLJI1i"WO",
~~ ~
-j
.j 3.8.2 Non-Comgliance of Priority II Threshold
J Discussion:
~] For ten consecutive years, the threshold has not been met,
:I but there was a slight improvement from last year. There
has been a correlation between staffing levels and the
average response time for Priority II calls.
A final report from SANDAG on the 2007 CVPD Resident
Opinion Survey indicates an approval rating of over 900/0.
· ~ - ~ . ::::~:~lrD~~ ;;?~~:.t~~:::~ ~i:~;~,r,;;~~~:':;:~~p<:'::i~O..,:h';[:~;il:: :C-~: ~ ='E::: ::.'.;:: 'I,; ::~ J~L;i:ii;-;J2 ::/it~
~
i!:II1l1f (})F
iCIHlL.II!A wo~
3.8.2 Non-Compliance of Priority II Threshold
Recommendation:
The City Council shall direct the City Manager to have the Police
Department complete and implement an action plan which
addresses the decline in performance relative to meeting the GMOC
threshold for Priority II calls, by fall 2008.
Staff Response:
Given the current budget situation, the Police Department does not
anticipate the necessary resources being available to meet the
threshold standard for Priority II CFS. The Department recently cut
10 officer positions to address City budget shortfalls. A substantial
number of additional sworn officers would be necessary to meet the
threshold standard for Priority II urgent response calls.
... CC... C C.. C~ . . . .. .. . J
. Lj... '~ir&6i~<r" jJ.{.;~;:.~;2/',~;';;~. ;;~fi"';':,~;~. <;;~/, "~;'.~';..<;,;<~ . .:~..(~;.&>.;~~;: (;f;~.:'1.i. :~4"."': :;'f.H..;';;...;;:.:~;~. "';~~..' ii.: ::j
" ~~--~... ... "'<"""~'--"c"P'O[ I'C E"'-'" "'''' =--.--. '... c........'..
3.8.3 Priority I Calls Taking Longer Than 10 Minutes
Issue:
City Council has asked that Priority 1 response times that are 10
minutes or longer be sent to the GMOC for Council review.
((]ffif(jlF
<CIl-iJ.\J\!A~
,~",\j~'~~:~pot:rC"E'"~~';>
3.8.3 Priority I Calls Taking Longer Than 10 Minutes
Discussion:
For the second consecutive year, response times have improved.
There were no negative results due to the longer response times in
31 of the calls. In six of the calls, it is impossible to determine
whether there were negative results. However, there is no evidence
that responding any faster to these calls would have changed the
outcome of the calls.
. ';~~~..;? ~;~.? ;~;:;.::-:':'; Y';ji~' }.~';:j::.'.ii..';:';;'~::'/; :;:;';';.;.. .:~. . .:~ :.~1';;.;.r:::. :f...J;;-."l
=~ - .. '..' ...- '.. -. PO'['IC'E'--' ......-- --_. ._;. - ~ -_. -. .
~ .. . ... -- .
(QIl]'\f(:l1:f ._
iDHJUlA Wlt5,lG,\
3.8.3 Priority I Calls Taking Longer Than 10 Minutes
Recommendation:
The Police Department shall closely monitor performance with regards
to Priority I calls with response times over 10 minutes.
Staff Response:
The Police Department will continue to closely monitor Priority I calls
with response times over 10 minutes, and will annually report this
information to the GMOC.
. '- ~
. . '~q~'; ;-";'::: ....~. ;", ~~,';?'~":,:;;; :....c;...;;;; . ..... '.' '~o/;''';~'~'?:{''''.; ,.:;.~.,' :::;r;;;;;; ...~.:.' .c;.. ". '~.' .,;....
~., "- ---- 'TRAFF'IC~ d___ _u' --. ", " -'"
iOHlU1!i" Wl!'~
Threshold Standards:
Citywide: Maintain Level of Service (LOS) "(" or better as
measured by observed average travel speed on all signalized
arterial segments, except that during peak hours a LOS "D" can
occur for no more than two hours of the day.
West of 1-805: Those signalized arterial segments that do not
meet the standard above, may continue to operate at their current
(year 1991) LOS, but shall not worsen.
-<~q~K~
~:::~L
~
lQjU'\fl'\F
((J}{J]Jfu"~,,
~tR;&F Fjt~~;
Threshold Finding:
Non-Compliance
SEGMENT
DIR. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)
Heritage Rd. (Telegraph Canyon Rd. - Olympic
Pkwy)
NB 0 (3 Hrs), E (3 Hrs)
La Media Rd. (Telegraph Canyon Rd. - Olympic
Pkwy)
NB 0 (3 Hrs)
Otay Lakes Rd. (E. H St. - Telegraph Canyon
Rd.)
NB 0 (4 Hrs)
SB 0 (3 Hrs), E (1 Hr)
There were five signalized arterial segments that failed to maintain
Level of Service (LOS) "e" and three of the five operated at LOS
"D", or less, for more than two hours a day.
=@F
<Dh11J1A V~
~ ",..~.-
J:'~TRAFl~;i' C
3.10.1 Non-Compliance of Threshold Standard
Issue:
There were three non-compliant arterial segments during the period
under review.
". !; tJ C'" '. ~q~'i~i,,:0.i;~~.i~'~);~/~i';..t.~~ii:~\;:'j:..':vii.~.'~''~". .O'wt.;J :\~ii'\ !. ::;'(;(. i. J~~::';' :~~lli";:.:."~~:...,;ti~::',: .:~.",*,. Ycc~:'; '~:, ..:.:.:4....; ~
. ~. ~.~..."'.,......._...... ....~......= ,..,.~~~..,... TR"'J1..' . ....F.F.I 'C" ...~. . ,....-.......... ........ .. .... .. ..... ... .......t
~ .... ,... . '. '.
- ~~
<<:&WCijJ .
ca:~IU[!A WIJ5ITA
,
3.10.1 Non-Compliance of Threshold Standard
Discussion:
Three arterial segments located in eastern Chula Vista in proximity to
SR-125 were non-compliant. The impacts of SR-125, which opened
in November 2007, are being monitored, and City staff will report
its findings to Council in June. If the segments continue to be
non-compliant, the report will include recommendations that will
mitigate the impacts.
.,<,
1St:;
"~'"
rn ~ -- --
- ~~~ :;\: ,:'\;:~";,,;-;;,,-,,,-~':':::,, _,,,,::,:':::,:,<r:,:' +;:: ie- " '_'~';:' c -",' ~,;;-:_>;,:_;~,_:.;::,-_-:? ',:-, ,~;:~ ;:+. ,';: .";:- :~
~.. -... .-.'------,..-. '-TRA-F F-rC' .... ......- .-~.,.. -.. ......-- ..'
~ W115!fA
3.10.1 Non-Compliance of Threshold Standard
Recommendation:
City Engineering staff shall provide recommendations that will
mitigate non-compliance if post-SR-125 traffic studies indicate that
the three segments continue to be non-compliant with the Traffic
threshold standard.
Staff Response:
As of May 2008, City engineering staff is compiling post-SR-125 traffic
counts in various locations throughout the City and will be presenting
a report with findings at the June 17, 2008 City Council meeting.
Staff is also implementing revised traffic signal timing plans at those
non-compliant locations.
<<Jj]J'\f(j:ii'
<CJL~ ~
~"""'~ .""'" ,,__ ____ ~'T"''''_", _.,_,_.<._..._._._,.,~ _* ~'~..... _ ".._
... .~" ,;::~: ;ic ~c t~RJ(F~Fie' >i'f';;;;"''t'<;~:'''' ~;""
c '~
,., ".'!:""'...-' ...,
;'--~._c ~-=-~:;:i;. ~
--'----.. . ...'. '
3.10.2 Maintenance and Rehabilitation of City Streets
Issue:
Street pavement and maintenance.
ff. :~"'l""i\i~~']~~!i'i;-"T'RAF'AtjA~i;C~,~,.fii:; '.;':;,~'1" ,,,';::1:' ~
3.10.2 Maintenance and Rehabilitation of City Streets
Discussion:
Council passed a resolution in April 2007, reaffirming its commitment
to implement a Pavement Management System. Although the City's
overall pavement condition is classified as good, annual rehabilitation
is required to prevent continued pavement deterioration. The City
has begun awarding pavement rehabilitation contracts, based on
staff recommendations. The goal is to perform the most cost-
effective treatments to maintain the best overall pavement condition,
not just to rehabilitate the "worst first".
..,....."O~'.
.~'\j~~.;.
~-
<<::Iimf <JV
~w~
_.
,,;,s':,f'" ,,:;,::>;;:,, ,i"",, TRA'F'F 'ie i.~~;C:;r},'~', ~~"" ,,"~, ,~' {: ' Yc;
". ~f.
"'~>d:"" '
"""'7"'i.'"
3.10.2 Maintenance and Rehabilitation of City Streets
Recom mendation:
Contracts should continue to be awarded based on recommendations
in response to the Pavement Management System.
Staff Response:
The City has awarded three contracts based on the recommendations
of the Pavement Management System and is preparing to award
other contracts.
, , (~ -..~~~.J; :: i:,c.::":;:'::''';i ,;;,'.',;>,,:';; "L'; ',:;'::,:'::,;':>:J.;;,,/,t.;",:;;';:i: :;\~i::':'" ;;:;,. ~~;,":~,', ',; ";"";'" .;':; "'';''''1
. ~--"..,- -' ',. '" ['1 B RA'RIE'S-.... ,,,.... ---..' ._. ,".. -_. . , -
iDHl!JI);'), ~
Threshold Standards:
The City shall construct 60,000 gross square feet (GSF) of additional
library space, over the June 30, 2000 GSF total, in the area east of
Interstate 805 by build-out. The construction of said facilities shall be
phased such that the City will not fall below the citywide ratio of 500
GSF per 1,000 population. Library facilities are to be adequately
equipped and staffed.
Threshold Finding.: Non-Compliance
The City's library system has not kept pace with growth; the facilities
ratio of 500 GSF per 1,000 population has not been met for the past
four years, beginning in FY 03-04, as shown in the table below.
Future forecasts indicate that the threshold will not come back into
compliance until the Rancho del Rey Library is constructed.
. ~ - . ... -.-
" ~qf?,' ,/: '::~"'.'.:,;; ;>,;:''::':;,::i\~::/5''::>:;; :;;i::!' <:,':;::';"'I ::::,/,j"::' : ";,',:: ;':':1" ; ': ,;,",.:. ~I
~,., '~:' ::~- "'[I B~RtX'RIE'S~~' ,'~; d'_'~ "i,. "- ~
3 . 5 . 1 Li bra ry B u i I din 9 P I an
Issue:
For the fourth consecutive year, the City has not complied with the
threshold standard of providing 500 gross square feet of library facilities
per 1000 people. There is an urgency to begin construction of the
Rancho del Rey library branch.
~ . "" " ...... ....... .. .... 1
....~... .'~~1ti. ':'i$',cJ!;,:;:Y;),'f!>ili!'f..rBRiRfE"S''i:;;;i''<;~''"~':';;;k.,~. ;if",!
(aHJU~ W05lfA
3.5.1 Library Building Plan
Discussion:
The Library Threshold Standard Implementation Measure requires that
the City Council formally adopt and fund tactics to bring the library
system into conformance, and that construction, or another actual
solution, shall be scheduled to commence within three years of the
threshold not being satisfied (June 2007). The 1998 Library Master Plan
calls for the construction of a 30,000- square-foot, full-service, regional
library in Rancho del Rey. Construction, can begin once Council approves
funding.
Without the Rancho del Rey library, there is a lack of conveniently
located library facilities to serve the east side of Chula Vista. The
most significant influencing factor on library use is proximity of the
facility to the user.
'1~~'~k';!':-:;;~'i~'ltlBRXft;fE~siii~"~' ,'2~, l5.Zc' "1'~
,;;
3. 5. 1 Li bra ry B u i I din 9 P I an
Recommendation:
That the City Council direct the City Manager to prepare a specific
plan and timeline for the replenishment of the Libraries component of
the PFDIF, and construction of the Rancho del Rey library, at the
earliest possible time.
Staff Response:
Library staff will continue to look for opportunities to advance the
Rancho del Rey project, as well as seeking other opportunities to
provide services to the eastern side of our City. Construction timing
will be dependent upon Council prioritization of PFDIF expenditures
(see also response 3.1.1).
'ffi"~2Jjs~d~~~~~[~;JI'0B~'.~R~~~~0~R2~~I~E~~S~~~~~~~:~G~~~;,'
,~ ' .
:J ='t1F
; (DHJl.m,~ Wlm"A
;{ =-
3.5.2 lipdating the Library Master Plan
Issue:
The 1998 Library Master Plan is due to be updated and needs to reflect
the December 2005 General Plan Update.
~[ . ...... - . - . .. ....... ......
l~~r~!~r~~.~~:~f-~
j
- i 3.5.2 !J.pdating the Library Master Plan
Discussion:
. ..l
'~">'.:d.:'
. _......c.--
In addition to identifying needs generated by projected build-out
population from the 2005 General Plan Update, the Library Master
Plan update needs to consider changing trends to define the adequacy
of library facilities and equipment, and what constitutes adequate
staffing and hours of operation.
~'C~;'f,j;;;~ti:;~{j!f.;;;ll'i[;IB~RrE;S'}f,'-,.;j-t:_--' . Ji'-x. u.~]Lc'.."'.. .1....
~VN""
-1
, ....,:. ."
3.5.2 !lPdating the Library Master Plan
Recommendation:
1) Assess ultimate future library needs based upon the increased
capacity from the City's updated General Plan, and accordingly
update the Library Facilities Master Plan, and the threshold
standards reference.
Staff Response:
1) Upon adoption of the FYOB-09 City budget, Library staff will
secure the services of a consultant for the update of the Library
Facilities Master Plan. The Master Plan update will consider the
latest trends for establishing baseline facility and service
thresholds and recommend how to effectively achieve the
thresholds.
j ~., - ~ ~.,
'" ",'l%o':'" 'c,:,[ ''i'J';'J.';f: ~lJBRA"R f ES ':li:-(,~~c 1.' ,"i,v," 'i.ii' .1, .~
3.5.2 1J..pdating the Library Master Plan
Recom mendation:
2) Actively pursue planning for a new Eastern Urban Center branch
library.
Staff Response:
2) The City and EVC developer are actively planning the development
of the EVC, which will include an appropriately-sized library branch at
the heart of the urban core. It is estimated that the library could be
completed in the 2011-2012 timeframe.
~~~.
~
~~
~
CCOW (j)[F
CC[H][lJm W~~~
June 5, 2008
Growth Management
Oversight Commission
City Council/Planning Commission
and GMOC Joint Workshop