HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso 1969-605
. .,. "" "". .~~ "~. -.""""""..- '"~-""'-
--
RESOLUTION NO, 605
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO
THE CITY COUNCIL THE PREZONING OF PROPERTY EAST OF HILLTOP
HIGH SCHOOL BETWEEN WINDSOR PARK SUBDIVISION AND H STREET
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a prezoning was filed with the
City Clerk on the 25th day of November, 1969, application No, 69-CC, and
WHEREAS, said application requested that the property located east of
Hilltop High School between Windsor Park Subdivision and H Street, more particularly
described in said document, be reclassified from County E-l-A zone to R-3 zone, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on
said application, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given
by the publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least
10 days prior to the date of said hearing, and
WHEREAS, a hearing was held at said time and place, namely 7 P.M., Monday,
December 15, 1969, Council Chamber, Civic Center, 276 Guava Avenue, before the
Planning Commission, and said hearing was thereafter closed.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. From facts presented to the Commission, the Commission finds that public
necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require the
prezoning of property (18.35 acres) east of Hilltop High School between Windsor
Park Subdivision and H Street from E-l-A to R-l.
2. The findings of fact in support of said determination are as follows:
a. The existing General Plan designates the property as low density
residential, while the proposed revision to the Plan classifies the
area as medium density residential, neither of which conform to R-3
zoning.
b. The only access to the property from a dedicated street is through
a single family subdivision.
c. The tentative design of the H Street interchange denies H Street
access to the property. Without suitable access to the property,
R-3 zoning would impose unreasonable traffic volumes on Sheffield
Court.
d. Until the configuration of the interchange is finally formulated,
rezoning to R-3 is premature and even with better access the need
or desirability of R-3 zoning was not demonstrated by the applicant,
p~es ~e4~ l~JunoJ ^~~J a4~ o~ spuawwoJaJ uo~ss~wwoJ 6u~uueld a41 '[
'pa~ueJ6 aq uo~~eJ~]~sselJaJ
'~ueJ~ldde a4~ o~ pa~~~wsueJ~ aq lle4s uo~~nlosaJ s~4~ ]0 ^doJ e pue 'l~JunoJ ^~~J
a4~ o~ uO~~eJ~ldde a4~ 4~~M 6uole 'pa~~~wsueJ~ aq uo~~nlosaJ s~4~ ~e41 'v
s~4~ 'VIN~O~I1VJ 'V1SI^ VlnHJ ]0 NOISSIWWOJ 8NINNVld AIIJ a4~ ^q 03^O~ddV pue 03SSVd
:~~M-O~ 'a~O^ 6U~MOllO] a4~ ^q '696l 'JaqwaJao ]0 ^ep 4~Sl
~JeMa~s pue weu~nd 'swepv 'aJ~~ 'JalPue4J sJaqwaw :S3AV
auoN : S30N
au ON :lN3S8V
ZJ~^aJew Jaqwaw :NIV1S8V
uewJ~e4J
~~~
:lS311V
/'p'1t~t
v
~~/;!L' tt~
-
~~~,,'--__ Tl;1C~~
m"<""''''..~'''''~_''""""",.,",~,-,'' ._.,-.c"'''''.>".'.".",......,',,"-=''',.~~,;'-'''''"''"'''''_....,-,.____,___