HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Rpts. /2005/09/14
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Chula Vista, California
6:00 p.m.
Wednesday, September 14, 2005
Public Services Building
Council Chambers
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA
CALL TO ORDER: Madrid_ Felber_ Nordstrom_ Cortes_ Hom_
Bensoussan_ Tripp_
ROLL CALL/MOTIONS TO EXCUSE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE and MOMENT OF SILENCE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
August 24, 2005
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Opportunity for members of the public to speak to the Planning Commission
on any subject matter within the Commission's jurisdiction but not an item on
today's agenda. Each speaker's presentation may not exceed three minutes.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: GPA 05-01, PCZ 03-01 and PCS 03-01; Consideration of
General Plan Amendment, Rezone and Tentative
Subdivision Map for a project known as EI Dorado Ridge,
Chula Vista Tract 03-01; located on the east side of
Brandywine Avenue, across from Mendocino Drive, north
of Main Street.
Staff recommends that public hearing be continued to a date uncertain.
Planning Commission
- 2 -
September 14,2005
2. PUBLIC HEARING:
PCM 04-18; Consideration of Otay Ranch General
Development Plan Amendment; PCM 04-19 Village Six
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Amendment; PCZ
06-02 Zone Change; and PCS 05-16 Revised Tentative
Map for a mixed-use Village Six Core along both sides of
East Palomar Street between View Park Way and
Magdalena Avenue. Otay Project, LP
Project Manager: Harold Phelps, Associate Planner
DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), requests
individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City
meeting, activity, or service, request such accommodations at least forty-eight hours in advance for
meetings. and five days for scheduled services and activities. Please contact Diana Vargas for
specific information at (619) 691-5101 or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TOO) at 585-
5647, California Relay Service is also available for the hearing impaired,
MINUTES OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
of the City of Chula Vista, California
6:00 p.m.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Public Services Building
Council Chambers
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA
6:02:54 PM CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL/MOTIONS TO EXCUSE
Members Present:
Madrid, Felber, Bensoussan, Cortes, Hom, Nordstrom, Tripp
Others Present:
Nancy Lytle, Assistant Planning Director
John Schmitz, Principal Planner
Jeff Steichen, Associate Planner
John Mullen, Deputy City Attorney III
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE and MOMENT OF SILENCE
6:04:15 PM APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 10, 2005
MSC (Hom/Nordstrom) to approve minutes of 8/10/05 with an amendment that they reflect
excused absences for Commissioners Cortes, Felber and Bensoussan. Motion carried.
6:08:31 PM INTRODUCTORY REMARKS Read into the record by Chair Madrid
6:11 :03 PM
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS No public input.
1. PUBLIC HEARING:
GPA 05-01, PCZ 03-01 and PCS 03-01; Consideration of
General Plan Amendment, Rezone and Tentative Subdivision
Map for a project known as EI Dorado Ridge, Chula Vista Tract
03-01; located on the east side of Brandywine Avenue, across
from Mendocino Drive, north of Main Street.
Staff recommends that public hearing be continued to September 14, 2005,
MSC (Madrid/Hom) (7-0) that the Planning Commission continue public hearing to
September 14,2005. Motion carried.
Planning Commission
- 2 -
August 24, 2005
2. PUBLIC HEARING:
PCC 05-70; Consideration of a Master Use Permit to implement
the provisions of the Eastlake II PC District Regulations and
thereby allow specified uses and restrictions within the 36
acre portion of the Eastlake Business Center known as the
Design District Overlay, located at the northeast corner of Otay
Lakes Road and Fenton Avenue/Showroom Place.
6:12:57 PM
Background: Jeff Steichen reported that on April 5, 2005 the City Council adopted Ordinance
2999 amending Section IV of the Eastlake II PC District Regulations clarifying land uses
allowed within the 36-acre Design District Overlay. Section IV.2 requires the approval of a
Master Use Permit in order to implement the provisions of this section.
The new Section IV,3 includes the following land uses: 1) Manufacturing with showroom; 2)
Wholesale/Retail when in conjunction with distribution and showroom; 3) Furniture Stores;
and 4) Eating and drinking establishments, There is a provision thatgrants authority to the
Planning Commission to consider other uses on a case-by-case basis.
Staff analyzed the applicant's request to include an additional category for Professional
Offices for those who offer services related to the home improvement industry, Staff finds that
this category will enhance the mix of services and uses provided in the center, therefore, staff
is recommending inclusion of this category with no square footage restriction.
Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution approving the
Master Use Permit subject to conditions contained therein.
6:17:3\ PM
COMMISSION QUESTIONSIDISCUSSION
Commissioner Felber stated his concern with the no square footage restriction on
Professional Office use; his concern being that potentially there could be an over-proliferation
of office use in the center. Therefore, Cmr. Felber recommends that language be added
restricting office use to no more than 20 or 25% of the center's floor area,
6:19:02 PM
Commissioner Bensoussan stated she concurred with Cmr. Felber's statement and asked
for clarification on:
. Why the language "in conjunction with" contained in #2 of the land use categories was
omitted in #1 (Manufacturing with showroom), and
. Asked for clarification on the parking ratio
6:25: 14 PM
Commissioner Tripp inquired if the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration have been implemented.
John Schmitz responded that he couldn't say for certain whether they have been implemented
because some of them were coming on line as the center is developed.
6:26:36 PM
6:28:28 PM
6:35:43 PM
6:36:06 PM
Planning Commission
- 3 -
August 24, 2005
Cmr. Tripp further asked if the proposed Master Use Permit allows an intensification of uses
on the site beyond what was originally contemplated and would it allow an increase in traffic
trips beyond what was contemplated in the MND,
John Schmitz responded that this issue was discussed at length during the review of the GDP
regulations, and the findings were that it would not generate any more traffic than was
anticipated in a business center,
Commissioner Nordstrom expressed his enthusiastic support for the project as it will be a
destination-oriented center and will promote Chula Vista as having a regionally-recognized
state-of-the-art design district, in addition to generating significant tax revenue for the
community.
Public hearing opened.
Mike Vogt, developer, 368 Surrey Drive, Bonita thanked the Commission for consideration
of their proposal and stated he was available to answer any of the Commission's questions,
Mr. Vogt expounded on the complementary use of having a Professional Office Space
component to provide for interior designers, architects, engineers, and other people involved
in the home improvement industry.
Commissioner Hom stated that when the sign program was brought before the Commission,
one of their recommendations was to incorporate the name of the City of Chula Vista into the
sign program; he inquired what, if any, progress had been made on that.
Mr. Vogt responded that their comprehensive sign program has been updated and it does
include several logos and the name City of Chula Vista on the monument signs.
Public hearing closed.
MSC (Felber/Bensoussan) (7-0) that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution
approving the Master Use Permit subject to conditions contained therein, including a
condition that no more than 25% of the design district's floor area be dedicated to
professional office space. Motion carried unanimously.
6:38:45 PM 3. Action:
Nomination of Planning Commission GMOC Representative
for FY 05-06.
MSC (Nordstrom/Hom) (6-0-0-1) nominating Bill Tripp to serve as the Planning
Commission representative on GMOC for FY 0&06. Motion carried.
6:41 :34 PM DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Nancy Lytle stated that the Commission is in receipt of a copy of the report that is going to City
Planning Commission
- 4 -
August 24, 2005
Council in September regarding the Accessory Unit Ordinance.
The Commission is also in receipt of two publications put out by the League of California Cities, The
PlanninQ Commissioner's Handbook and Open and Public III, which is a condensed handbook on
the Brown Act; both are very useful resources,
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
6:44:47 PM Commission Cortes inquired on the status of the Zoning Code Update.
Nancy Lytle responded that the Zoning Code Update is the next big project the department will be
working on as soon as the General Plan Update is completed,
6:46:36 PM Meeting adjourned to September 14, 2005.
Diana Vargas, Secretary to the Planning Commission
*
The time stamp on this document is a link to locate when a specific discussion and/or statement
was made, To request a copy of the audio media contact to Diana Vargas at 585-5738,
~ I rc..
:-~-;
~~
CllY OF
CHUIA VISTA
Departfi1ent: of' Planning and Building
DATE:
September 14, 2005
TO:
City of Chula Vista Planning Commission
Marilyn R.F. Ponseggi, Environmental Review Coordinator ~
FROM:
SUBJECT: Continuance of the EI Dorado Ridge Project (IS-02-045)
During the public review period for the EI Dorado Ridge draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-
02-045), Staff received comment letters from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). Information provided by the project
traffic engineer is sufficient to address the comments from Caltrans. In order to address the
comments provided by CDFG, Environmental Staff has requested additional biological information
from the applicant and will continue to work with the applicant to resolve the issues identified in the
CDFG comment letter.
The applicant is requesting a two-week continuance. Staff is recommending that the Planning
Commission continue this item to a date uncertain. Although the applicant has submitted some
additional biological information, it is not sufficient to address all of the comments from CDFG.
Staff is of the opinion that two weeks is likely not enough time for the applicant's biologist to
prepare the additional information, staff to review it and make the necessary revisions to the final
environmental document for Planning Commission consideration. It is important to note that the
final decision on the proposed General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Tentative Map will be made
by the City Council. This item cannot go forward to the City Council until the Planning Commission
makes a recommendation on the project and the final environmental document.
At the time of the hearing, the Planning Commission will be provided with the revised
environmental document along with copies of both comment letters and responses for each issue
raised.
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT
Item: ~
Meeting Date: 09/14/05
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: Consideration of Otay Ranch General Development Plan
(GDP) Amendment (PCM-04-l8), Village Six Sectional Planning Area
(SPA) Plan Amendment (PCM-04-l9), Zone Change (PCZ-06-02), and
Revised Tentative Map (PCS-05-l6) for a mixed-use Village Six Core - Otay
Proj ect, LP.
Otay Project, LP (Otay Ranch Company) proposes a mixed-use project in the Village Six Core along
both sides of East Palomar Street, providing approximately 20,000-sq. ft. of ground floor commercial
retail space on the south side and 20 live/work shopkeeper units on the north side. The project
includes 158 for-sale condominium units on both sides of East Palomar Street between View Park
Way and Magdalena Avenue including units reserved for low-income households.
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and has conducted an Initial Study, IS-04-035 in accordance
with the California Environmental Quality Act. Based upon the results of the Initial Study, the
Environmental Review Coordinator has detennined that the project could result in significant effects
on the environment. However, revisions to the project made by or agreed to by the applicant would
avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur;
therefore, the Environmental Review Coordinator has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration, IS-
04-035.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution PCM-04-l8
recommending that the City Council approve the resolutions amending the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan (GDP), Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, Revised Tentative Map,
and Zone Change Ordinance to allow for a mixed-use project in the Village Six Core.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
INTRODUCTION:
The mixed-use project requires an Otay Ranch General Development Plan Amendment (GDP A), a
Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Amendment to the Site Utilization Plan Map, a
Zone Change to the Planned Community (PC) District Regulations, and a revised Tentative Map for
the creation ofa l58-unit condominium map that would allow forresidential units on the 3.7-acre
site current zoned Community Purpose Facility (CPF) along with the existing 3.0-acre Mixed-Use
(MU) site. If the three amendments and the tentative map were approved, the project would then
require a Design Review and a Final Map to be subsequently reviewed for approval.
Page 2, Item_
Meeting Date 09/14/05
DISCUSSION:
1. Background
The Otay Ranch General Development Plan was approved by the City Council in October 1993, and
the Otay Ranch Village Six SPA Plan was approved in January 2002. The Otay Ranch Company
applied for the GDP and SPA Amendments in June 2004. The original proposal was to provide
mixed-use retail and residential condominiums as planned for on the existing 3.0-acre mixed-use
site, but then allow for condominium units exclusively as part of the same project on the 3.7-acre
Community Purpose Facility (CPF) site across the street. The fundamental rationale was to provide
the City with more market rate along with a prescribed percentage of income qualified affordable
multi-family housing units.
Staff responded to the application in August 2004 with the request that the proposed project include
a mixed-use component that included the CPF site proposal. As this location is the tenninus of East
Palomar Street, and the viability of the limited size and fTontage (approximately half the width of
Heritage Town Center) of the 3.0-acre mixed-use site was cause for concern, it was suggested by
staffthat retail and/or live-work shop keeper units be incorporated into the town homes or stack flats
being proposed across the street fTom the mixed-use site on the CPF site.
The Planning Department held a community meeting on July 21, 2005 that was noticed to every
resident and property owner in the adjacent developments to the project site, over a 1 ,OOO-ft. radius,
including approximately 50 percent of Village Six. The purpose of the meeting was to present the
conceptual design and answer question about the projects mixed-use, the transit station proposed in
the median of East Palomar Street between the two project sites, and the residential market rate and
affordable housing components.
2. Site Characteristics
The project site consists of a 3-acre parcel on the south side of East Palomar Street and a 3.7-acre
parcel on the north side of East Palomar Street in Otay Ranch Village Six. The project site is
relatively flat and has been rough graded. The subject parcels are undeveloped and located on the
on East Palomar Street between View Park Way and Magdalena Avenue. The fTontage roadway
improvements are completed along East Palomar Street, View Park Way and Magdalena Avenue.
Surrounding land uses consist of the following:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Otay Ranch Company Private Swim Club and Recreation Building
Santa Venetia Neighborhood Park and Veterans Elementary School
Neighborhoods R-10 and R-9B (Treviana and Monet Condominiums)
Neighborhoods R-8 and R-7 (Mer Soliel and Bellame Chateaux Condominiums)
Page 3, Item_
Meeting Date 09/14/05
3. General Plan. Zoning and Land Use
General Plan/General Development Plan:
The City's General Plan and Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) designated the land
within the Otay Valley Parcel for urban villages that are transit-oriented and pedestrian friendly.
Otay Ranch villages are intended to contain higher residential densities and a variety of mixed-uses
in the village cores, surrounded by single- family homes in the secondary residential areas outside of
the village cores. The two parcels under consideration are located in the village core and propose
higher residential densities and a variety of mixed-uses in conformance with the City's General Plan
and Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP).
Zoning:
The subject property is currently zoned Planned Community (PC), and within the Village Six SPA
Plan Planned Community (PC) District Regulations the two parcels under consideration are
designated on the Land Use Districts Plan Map as Community Purpose Facility (CPF) and Mixed
Use (MU) and are described as Neighborhood Planning Areas CPF-l and MU-l on the Site
Utilization Plan Map.
Land Use:
The two parcels under consideration are vacant, and all ofthe neighborhood planning areas within
both the Otay Ranch Company's and the McMillin Company's tentative map portions of Village Six
have either been completed or are currently in the process of being developed under their respective
single-family or multi-family final map approvals.
4. Proposal
The project proposes a mixed-use project in the Village Six Core along both sides of East Palomar
Street, providing approximately 20,000-sq. ft. of ground floor commercial retail space on the south
side and 20 live/work shopkeeper units on the north side.
The project includes 158 for-sale condominium units on both sides of East Palomar Street between
View Park Way and Magdalena Avenue including units reserved for low-income households.
As part of the proposal, the existing frontage improvements located along the north side of East
Palomar Street will need to be removed and the existing above ground utilities serving the
neighborhoods to the north will have to be relocated in order to widen East Palomar Street and allow
for diagonal parking to occur on both sides ofthe street to serve the 20,000-sq. ft. of mixed-use retail
on the south side of East Palomar and the 20 live-work units on the north side of East Palomar Street.
Further refinement of the street improvement concept will be provided in the Design Review.
Page 4, Item_
Meeting Date 09/14/05
Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment:
The Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment (PCM -04-18) proposes revisions to
GDP text and land use table for Village Six. Since Village Six is projected to be completed with 61
less units than the 2,232-units depicted in the land use table, the proposed amendment is to add 97-
units to the total units shown in the Village Six Land Use Table in order to accommodate the
proposed 158-unit for-sale condominium project.
Otay Ranch Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Amendment:
The Otay Ranch Village Six SPA Plan Amendment (PCM-04-19) proposes to amend the Site
Utilization Plan Map by re-designating the 3.7-acre parcel on the north side of East Palomar Street
from Community Purpose Facility (CPF-l) to Mixed-Use (MU-2), and re-designating a 0.7-acre
portion of the existing 3.0-acre Mixed-Use (MU-l) parcel on the south side of East Palomar Street
from Mixed-Use (MU-l) to Community Purpose Facility (CPF-3). The existing 1.5-acre Private
Swim Club and Park (CPF-lx) will be re-named CPF-l.
Otay Ranch Village Six SPA Plan Planned Community (PC) District Zone Change:
The Otay Ranch Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Planned Community (PC) District
Regulations Zone Change (PCZ-06-02) proposes to rezone the Land Use Districts Map byre-zoning
the 3.7 -acre parcel on the north side of East Palomar Street from Community Purpose Facility (CPF)
to a Mixed-Use (MU) site, and incorporating a 0.7-acre Community Purpose Facility (CPF) site
within the existing 3.0-acre Mixed-Use (MU) site on the south side of East Palomar Street.
Otay Ranch Village Six Otay Ranch Company Portion Revised Tentative Map:
The Revised Tentative Map (PCS-05-16) is proposed to allow the sale of 158 condominium units on
the existing MU-l site and the proposed MU-2 site.
5. Analysis
Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment:
The application proposes to amend the General Development Plan (GDP) text and land use table for
Village Six in order to allow for an additional 97 multi-family residential units over the previously
approved 2,232 units for Village Six.
The proposal would amend the Otay Ranch General Development Plan descriptions for Village Six
with regards to the maximum multi-family and total residential units, as well as increase the total
acreage of mixed-use and decrease the total acreage of community purpose facility acreage and
increase the total approximate population.
Page 5, Item_
Meeting Date 09/14/05
Although 158-units are proposed, the total number of units above the maximum 2,232 total units
shown in the Village Six land use table would only increase by 97-units. The Final Maps for all
residential neighborhood-planning areas built or nearly completed in Village Six show that there
would be 61 less units built. As shown in the table below, revisions to individual neighborhood
planning areas have changed from what the GDP and SPA Plan projected to be the actual number of
units built:
Village Six Residential GDP& Final Map Difference
Neighborhood Areas: SPA Units: Units: A:
Neighborhood R-1 McMillin 105-sf 10 I-sf -4
Neighborhood R-2A ORC 87-sf 92-sf +5
Neighborhood R-2B ORC 115-sf 106-sf -9
Neighborhood R-3 McMillin 159-sf 163-sf +4
Neighborhood R-4 McMillin 92-sf 92-sf 0
Neighborhood R-5 ORC ll1-sf 106-sf -5
Neighborhood R-6 McMillin 126-sf 126-sf 0
Neighborhood R-7A ORC 88-sf 90-mf +2
Neighborhood R-7B ORC 165-mf 201-mf +36
Neighborhood R-8 ORC 337-mf 293-mf -44
Neighborhood R-9A ORC 163-mf 188-mf +25
Neighborhood R-9B ORC 326-mf 255-mf -71
Neighborhood R-10 McMillin 212-mf 212-mf 0
S-2/ R-ll McMillin 146-sf O-sf -146
Sub-Total: McMillin 840 694 -146
Sub-Total: ORC 1,392 1,331 -61
Total Residential: V-6 2,232 2,025 -207
As seen in the above table, none of the McMillin Neighborhood units are affected by the proposal.
This table does not include the 146 provisional units ofthe secondary land use Neighborhood R-11
that were not used by the Catholic Diocese for the primary land use Neighborhood S-2 for the 32.5-
acre Mater Dei Catholic High School. Therefore, there are 61 less units built than were authorized
for the Otay Ranch Company, and so the Village Six land use table would only increase by 97 -units
in order to build the 158 condominium units proposed.
Otay Ranch Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Amendment:
The Village Six SPA Plan amendment proposes to amend the Site Utilization Plan map and table to
allow for an overall reduction in Community Purpose Facility (CPF) acreage provided in Village Six
while allowing an increase in overall residential units and population in Village Six. This reduction
is acceptable because there is a surplus of CPF land in Village Six.
Community Purpose Facility (CPF) acreage is based on the projected population for each village.
Page 6, Item_
Meeting Date 09/14/05
1.39-acres of CPF acreage per 1,000 persons projected population is required for each village.
Population projections are based on 3.2 persons for each single-family unit and 2.55 persons for each
multi-family unit. The Village Six land use table in the Otay Ranch GDP showed a total of 990
single-family and 1,242 multi-family units, for a total population of 6,336 persons, which would
require 8.8-acres ofCPF. The CPF obligation is met as shown in the following table:
CPF-1
CPF-1x
CPF-2bx
CPF-3x
CPF-2
Total
Current Villa2e Six SPA Plan CPF Site Areas and Acrea2e:
Village Six Community Purpose Facility (CPF) Areas:
Village Core Parcel
Private Swim Club and Recreation Center (ORC)
Private Pedestrian Park (ORC)
Private Pedestrian Park (McMillin)
Mater Dei Parish Church
CPF Acrea2e
Acreage:
3.7-Acres
1.5-Acres
0.7-Acres
0.7-Acres
11.5-Acres
1S.1-acres
As shown in the above table, there is currently a surplus of CPF acreage in Village Six. The Otay
Ranch GDP and the Village Six SPA Plan would have required 8.8-acres, and the total acreage
provided is 18.1-acres. The CPF-2 site by itself provides more than the minimum required acreage
by providing 11.5-acres for the Mater Dei Catholic Parish Church, adjacent to the 32.5-acre site
approved for the development of the Mater Dei Catholic High School.
The proposal to add 158 multi-family units would add 403 persons to the approximate total
population of Village Six, and the additional population would increase the total CPF requirement
for Village Six to 9.41-acres. Therefore, the proposal to convert the 3.7 -acre community purpose
facility (CPF-1) site to mixed-use (MU-2) would reduce the total CPF acreage in Village Six from
I8.1-acres to I4.4-acres, so there will still be a surplus of CPF acreage in Village Six.
Otay Ranch Village Six SPA Plan Planned Community (PC) District Zone Change:
The proposed rezone only affects the Planned Community (PC) District Regulations Land Use
Districts Map. There are no proposed changes to the zoning regulations. The zone change to the
3.7 -acre parcel on the north side of East Palomar Street from Community Purpose Facility (CPF) to a
Mixed-Use (MU) site, and the incorporation of a 0.7-acre Community Purpose Facility (CPF) site
within the existing 3.0-acre Mixed-Use (MU) site on the south side of East Palomar Street constitute
the entirety of the land use or zoning map changes.
Otay Ranch Village Six Otay Ranch Company Portion Revised Tentative Map:
The Revised Tentative Map allows the proposed MU-2 mixed-use site and the existing MU-I mixed-
use site to be considered as a two-lot I 58-unit condominium map, subject to the approval of a Final
Page 7, Item_
Meeting Date 09/14/05
Condominium Map. Based on the environmental assessment, it does not appear that the addition of
158-units into the village core will have an adverse impact or cause impacts that cannot be mitigated.
There are a total of nine mitigation measures that are incorporated in the tentative map resolution's
environmental condition, which will be addressed at appropriate stages in the development of
project, such as when grading and building pennits are to be issued.
The Environmental Section detennined that the project would require a Mitigated Negative
Declaration (MND) and the applicant was required to prepare a Supplementary Air Quality Report,
Noise Report, Drainage/Water Quality Report, Sewer Service Report, and Traffic Impact Study.
The Housing Division supports the inclusion of affordable for-sale condominiums at this location.
The number of units that would be income qualified is to be detennined as part of the affordable
housing plans that the developer is preparing in fulfillment of such obligations for Villages Six,
Seven and future Village Two. It is anticipated that between 25 and 50 percent ofthe units may be
provided as affordable for sale condominiums and would be mixed into all of the residential
buildings on both project sites.
Other conditions of approval require that parkland dedication and development fees be made or paid
as necessary when buildingpennits are issued to address the introduction of new multi-family units.
Engineering conditions address requirements ofthe tentative map as well as the sewer, stonn water
management requirements that will be made of the project when the condominium map is fully
established in the final map and with improvement plans.
The addition ofthe158-units will be hannonious with the surrounding residential densities of the
multi-family neighborhoods in the village core areas. As the center ofthe village core, the density
will be comparable to adjacent project densities.
The following table compares the density ofthe proposed mixed-use 158-condominium project with
the other multi-family neighborhood developments located adjacent to the two sites in the village
core area:
Multi-Family Neighborhood:
Neighborhood R-7 A:
Neighborhood R-7B:
Neighborhood R -8:
Neighborhood R-9A:
Neighborhood R-9B:
Neighborhood R-I0:
Proposed on MU-l and MU-2:
Totals / Avera2e:
Total Units:
90-units
201-units
293-units
188-units
255-units
212-units
158-units
1,397-units
Acreage:
7.0-acres
10.8-acres
11.7-acres
21.8-acres
12.7-acres
12. I-acres
6.7-acres
82.8-acres
Density:
7.0-du/ac
18.6-du/ac
25.0-du/ac
8.6-du/ac
20.1-du/ac
17.5-du/ac
23.6-du/ac
16.9-du/ac
It is expected that the design will be high quality and will provide landmark architectural elements as
Page 8, Item_
Meeting Date 09/14/05
required by the Village Six Design Plan and Master Precise Plan for the Village Core. The
development must also comply with the applicable multi-family zoning standards of the Planned
Community District Regulations.
The building height requirement for medium high-density multi-family development is 4-story
maximum or 60- ft. The architectural theme of the village is European or French Countryside and the
conceptual site plan and design elevations show a three-story profile incorporating gable windows
within a high pitch mansard roof element, perhaps as part of an occasional 4th level loft element.
These conceptual design elevations were presented at a Community meeting held July 21 st and will
also be provided as part of the presentation of this project.
If the amendments, zone change and tentative map are approved, the Planning and Building
Department may commence the design review process for the actual development project. The
project will require site plan and architectural approval by the Design Review Committee.
Commercial retail and live-work unit business uses must comply with the Planned Community
District Regulations and may require Conditional Use Pennits.
CONCLUSION:
Staffbelieves that the proposed amendments to the Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Village
Six SPA Plan Site Utilization Map, Zone Change to the Village Six Planned Community (PC)
District Regulations Land Use Districts Map, and Revised Tentative Map are consistent with the
Otay Ranch GDP policies and the Chula Vista General Plan, and recommends approval of the
applications.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Village Six Locator Map
2. Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-04-035)
3. Application and Disclosure Statement
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. PCM-04-18
5. Draft City Council Resolution No. (GDP Amendment)
6. Draft City Council Resolution No. (Village Six SPA Amendment)
7. Draft City Council Ordinance No. (Village Six SPA PC Zone Change)
8. Draft City Council Resolution No. (Revised Tentative Map)
J :\PLANNING\HAROLD\ V -6MIXED-USEPCREPORT.DOC
CHULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR PROJECT Otay Project L.P.
C) APPLICANT:
~~g~~~1: ORV6
SCALE: FILE NUMBER:
NORTH No Scale PCS-05-16
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
DESIGN REVIEW
Request Proposing rezone from CPF to MU to allow 158 multy-family units
Related cases: None
J:\planning\carlos\locators\pcs0516.cdr 06.23,05
Mitigated Negative Declaration
PROJECT NAME: Otay Ranch Village Six Mixed-Use Project
PROJECT LOCATION: East Palomar Street between View Park Way and
Magdalena Avenue.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 643-051-23 and 643-051-24
PROJECT APPLICANT: OtayProject L.P.
CASE NO.: IS-04-035
DATE OF DRAFT DOCUMENT: July 29,2005
DATE OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEETING: August 29, 2005
DATE OF FINAL DOCUMENT:
,2005
Prepared by:
Mary Venables
A. Proiect Setting
The project site consists of two vacant undeveloped properties, a 3-acre parcel and a 3.7-acre
parcel in Village Six of the Otay Ranch Planned Community. The subject parcels are located
on the north and south sides of East Palomar Street between View Park Way and Magdalena
Avenue. (Refer to Exhibit A - Location Map). The project site is relatively flat and has been
rough graded. Frontage roadway improvements are completed along East Palomar Street,
View Park Way and Magdalena Avenue.
Land uses surrounding the project site consist of the following:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Neighborhood pool & recreation facility
Park and school
Multi-family residential with NE portion under construction.
Multi-family residential
B. Proiect Description
The proposal consists of an amendment to the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP)
to increase the total number of authorized units in Village Six by approximately 97 units.
Also included is a request to amend the Otay Ranch Village Six Sectional Planning Area
(SPA) Plan to rezone the existing 3.7-acre Community Purpose Facility (CPF-1) site to
Mixed-Use (MU-2) and to add a 1.5-acre CPF site (CPF-3) within the existing MU-1 parcel
to pennit the development of 158 for-sale condominiums, including live/work units and
approximately 20,000 square feet of ground floor commercial retail space. In addition, a
Tentative Map (TM) revision to allocate the residential units for condominium sales
I
including a portion to be reserved as affordable for purchase by low-income households is a
part of the proposal.
Prior Approvals and Environmental Documentation
The Otay Ranch General Development Plan/SRP Program Final EIR (EIR 90-01) and the
Sphere of Influence Update EIR have previously addressed the development of Village Six.
The Otay Ranch Program EIR was certified by the City Council and San Diego County
Board of Supervisors on October 28,1993. The City of Chula Vista certified the Sphere of
Influence Update EIR and Mitigation Monitoring Program on March 21, 1995.
A Second Tier Environmental Impact Report (FEIR 98-01) addressed the adoption of a
Sectional Planning Area Plan for Village Six of the Otay Ranch. The impact area considered
in this EIR totaled approximately 443 acres; this included 386 acres within the Village Six
project area and 56.3 acres in two borrow/storage areas. The City of Chula Vista certified the
Final Second Tier EIR and Mitigation Monitoring Program in December 2001.
Environmental review for the proposed project has been required to address any potential
environmental impacts beyond those originally anticipated in the Village Six EIR. This
document is a tiered environmental document to the Village Six FEIR 98-01.
The project proposal involves an increase in the total number of authorized units in Village
Six from 2,086 units to 2,183 units. This represents an increase of 97 dwelling units that
were not analyzed in the certified EIR for the Otay Ranch Village Six and SPA. In the
previous environmental document, FEIR 98-01, the 3.7-acre parcel was designated a
Community Purpose Facility (CPF) site and the 3-acre site a Mixed-Use site. In order to
implement the project proposal, a rezone ofthe 3.7-acre CPF site to Mixed-Use is necessary.
C. Compliance with Zoning and Plans
The site is located within the Otay Ranch General Development Plan with a Land Use
Designation of LMV (Low-Medium Village Density Residential) and CPF-l & MU-l
(Community Purpose Facility & Mixed Use) in the Planned Community (PC) Zone. The
project is consistent with the regulations of the PC Zone and with the LMV General Plan
designation. The project requires the approval of amendments to the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan (GDP) and Otay Ranch Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan,
and a Tentative Map revision by the Planning Commission and City Council.
D. Public Comments
On May 12, 2005, a Notice of Initial Study was circulated to property owners within a 500-
foot radius of the project site. The public comment period ended on May 23, 2005. Staff
received 7 verbal communications and 2 written communications from residents of the
surrounding area. The majority of the public comments focused on the potential impact of
affordable housing on property values, as well as traffic congestion, parking and increased
density. The traffic issues are addressed in the technical study noted below.
2
E. Identification of Environmental Effects
An Initial Study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including an attached Environmental
Checklist form) determined that the proposed project may have potential significant
environmental impacts however; mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project
to reduce these impacts to less than significant level. This Mitigated Negative Declaration
has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State of California Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines.
Air Quality
The proposed project site is located in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB). To assess the
potential air quality impacts of the proposed amendment to the Otay Ranch GDP and Village
Six SPA, Otay Ranch Village Six SPA Amendment; Supplementary Air Quality Report was
prepared by EDAW Inc., dated June 15,2005. The results of this analysis are summarized
below:
Short-term Impacts
The proposed project will result in an increase in air pollutants during the construction phase
of the project. Fugitive dust would be created during grading and construction activities.
Although air quality impacts resulting from construction-related operations are potentially
significant, they are considered short-term in duration since construction-related activities are
a relatively short-term activity. Dust control measures implemented during grading
operations would be regulated in accordance with the rules and regulations of the County of
San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and the California Air Resources Board.
FEIR 98-01 identified significant temporary equipment exhaust emissions resulting from the
construction of the Village Six SPA and mitigation measures 5.11-1 were required to
mitigate short-term construction related air quality impacts to below a level of less than
significant. These mitigation measures will be implemented during construction and placed
as notes on all grading plans for development within Village Six to lessen short term impacts
to a level of less than significant.
Long-term Impacts
Regional Air Quality
The Supplementary Air Quality report determined mobile source emissions calculated for the
proposed project would result in a minimal increase in pollutants above what was evaluated
in FEIR 98-01. The project air quality study projected a less than 10 percent increase in
pollutants with the proposed condominium and mixed-use land uses. As indicated in the air
quality report, regional air quality conditions are likely to improve due to improvements in
vehicle manufacturing standards. Regional impacts to air quality would be less than
significant.
3
Local Emissions
According to the Supplementary Air Quality report carbon monoxide (CO) "hot spots" would
not occur as a result of the proposal since there are no severely congested intersections in the
project site that would at operate at LOS E or F needed to result in hot spots. No significant
local emission impacts were identified in FEIR 98-0 I
Hydrology and Water Quality
To assess the potential hydrology, drainage and water quality impacts of the proposal, Otay
Ranch Village 6 GDP/SP A Plan Amendment Drainage/Water Quality Memorandum, dated
March 23, 2005 was prepared by Hunsaker & Associates. The results of this analysis are
summarized below.
Onsite Hydrology
The onsite hydrologic analysis indicates that the prop<?sed project will generate a minimal
change in runoff from the anticipated flows reported in FEIR 98-01. The Drainage/Water
Quality memorandum indicates that the change in flow would not result in significant
impacts to the storm drain system. The on site storm drain facilities would adequately
accommodate the projected flow.
Offsite Hydrology
In the Addendum to Master Drainage Study for Poggi Canyon Channel, prepared by
Hunsaker & Associates and dated March 24, 2004, the project site was considered
commercial land use with a higher projected runoff than the proposed project. The current
offsite analysis for the proposed project indicates a decrease in flows to the Poggi Canyon
Channel due to the change in land use thus resulting in a reduction in the impact previously
anticipated.
Water Quality
Runoff from the project site is proposed to be routed to a storm water treatment unit located
north of the site within Village 6. This downstream treatment unit would adequately
accommodate the flow generated by the proposed project.
The City's Storm Water Management Standards and the adopted Standard Urban Storm
Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) require the project applicant to prepare a Water Quality
Technical Report (WQTR) prior to submittal of grading plans. In compliance with the
SUSMP the WQTR identifies pollutants of concern, incorporating on-site Best Management
Practices (BMP's) and long-term maintenance provisions.
These mitigation measures include the approval of a detailed drainage study prior to issuance
of a grading permit, submittal of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), erosion
control measures on all disturbed areas, plus erosion control measures in place during winter
and spring months for the undisturbed areas, and treatment of urban pollutants. As a result of
compliance with these measures the impacts are mitigated to a level less than significant.
4
Noise
To assess the potential noise impacts of the project, a supplementary noise report was
prepared by EDA W Inc., Otay Ranch Village Six SPA Amendment: Supplementary Noise
Report, dated June 15,2005. The results of this analysis are summarized below.
Construction Noise
Construction activities have the potential to cause short-term noise impacts to noise-sensitive
uses adjacent to the project site (i.e., single family residences). Noise produced by
construction equipment varies substantially depending upon the type of equipment being
used and its operation and maintenance. Due to the presence of residential development in
adjacent and surrounding areas of the project site, the provisions of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code, Section 17.24.050(J), regarding construction noise applies to the project.
This requirement would ensure that residents are not disturbed by construction noise during
the most noise sensitive periods of the day.
Noise-Land Use Compatibility
The land use compatibility noise standard of 65 Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)
was used in the noise analysis presented in FEIR 98-01 and the Supplementary Noise Report.
The Supplementary Noise Report determined that the traffic noise level to the residences
north and south of East Palomar Street on View Park Way would be 59 dBA CNEL and the
traffic noise to those residences on Magdalena Avenue south of East Palomar would be 62
dBA CNEL. Traffic noise levels at the edge of the right of way of the project site on East
Palomar Street are projected at 65 dBA CNEL. The noise level threshold of significance will
not be exceeded and no significant noise impacts will occur and no additional mitigation
measures would be required beyond those measures contained in FEIR 98-01. In
conformance with the Village Six FEIR 98-01, the applicant will be required to submit an
acoustical study demonstrating that exterior areas are below the 65 CNEL threshold.
The proposal includes approximately 17,000 square feet of ground floor commercial retail
space that may contain HV AC equipment. Mitigation measures in FEIR 98-01 require that
noise levels from HV AC equipment shall not exceed the City's Noise Ordinance Standards.
The mitigation measure also requires preparation of a report demonstrating that the HV AC
equipment is designed to insure compliance with the noise standards prior to approval of
building permits. Mitigation Measure 5.12.3 in FEIR 98-01 will mitigate the impact to a
level less than significant.
Interior Noise
The State Uniform Building Code specifies that an interior noise study must be prepared
whenever an exterior noise level at a multi-family residential unit is anticipated to exceed 60
CNEL. The noise study must demonstrate the structures are designed to limit interior noise
levels to no more than 45 CNEL. Mitigation Measure 5.12-1c ofFEIR 98-01 requires such a
noise study and thus would also apply to residences proposed on East Palomar Street
between View Park Way and Magdalena Avenues and on Magdalena Avenue south of East
5
Palomar Street. Implementation of this mitigation measure would mitigate interior noise
impacts to a less than significant level.
Traffic/Circulation
To assess the potential traffic/circulation impacts of the project, a traffic impact analysis was
prepared by Wilson & Company, Otay Ranch - Village Six Mixed Use Affordable/Market
Housing Project Traffic Impact Study, dated June 9, 2005. As indicated in the project traffic
study, trip generation for the project was determined by adjusting the previously planned
community facilities land uses and incorporating the proposed 158 units. The project
proposal is estimated to generate an additional 1,108 daily trips; including 93 AM peak hour
trips and 115 PM peak hour trips.
Roadway Segment Analysis
Level of Service (LOS) analyses for nineteen key study area roadway segments determined
that all would operate at LOS C or better with the exception of Magdalena Avenue, between
Cobblecreek Street and Wellbrook Street and Magdalena Avenue between Wellbrook Street
and East Palomar Street. These segments would operate at a LOS D, which is consistent
with the City's traffic threshold and the Otay Ranch GDP Village Street System Policies and
Mobility Objective. Therefore, the segment impact is considered not significant.
Intersection Analysis
The traffic impact study analyzed twelve key study area intersections. The intersection at
East Palomar Street and View Park Way is the only study area intersection projected to
operate at an unacceptable LOS. All other study area intersections would operate at LOS C
or better. The additional traffic created by the proposed project would cause a cumulative
impact at East Palomar Street and View Park Way; therefore, a mitigation measure would be
required at this location. In order to ensure an acceptable LOS, signalization at East Palomar
Street and View Park Way is required as a mitigation measure.
Site Access
Access to the project site is proposed by means of five stop-controlled driveways, three along
View Park Way and two along Magdalena Avenue. All project driveways would operate at
acceptable levels of service and will be designed in accordance with City standards.
Utilities and Service Systems
Otay Ranch Village 6 Sewer Service Memorandum prepared by Dexter Wilson Engineering,
Inc., dated April 19, 2005 provided an assessment of the on site and offsite sewer facilities for
the proposed project. The project proposal will result in an increase in the average daily
sewage flow of 18,440 gallons per day, approximately 70 additional EDUs beyond that
which was originally estimated for the project site and considered in FEIR 98-01. According
to the City's Engineering Department, the onsite 8-inch gravity sewer line can fully
accommodate the proposed increase in sewage flow. No impacts are anticipated.
6
The offsite sewer analysis determined that upon completion of Reach 205 of the Poggi
Canyon Interceptor, the system will have adequate capacity to serve the total committed
EDU's plus the additional 70 EDU's from the Village 6 Mixed Use project. The Engineering
Department has indicated that project specific construction and building permits are
contingent upon completion of Reach 205 of the Poggi Canyon Interceptor project, which is
currently underway at this time. A mitigation measure stipulating completion would mitigate
offsite sewer impacts to less than significant.
F. Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Impacts
The following mitigation measures shall be made conditions of project approval where
appropriate and/or shall be shown on all applicable demolition, grading, and building plans
as details, notes, or as otherwise appropriate.
Air Quality
1. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented during construction and placed
as notes on all grading plans:
a) Minimize simultaneous operation of multiple construction equipment units
b) Use low pollutant-emitting construction equipment
c) Use electrical construction equipment as practical
d) Use catalytic reduction for gasoline-powered equipment
e) Use injection timing retard for diesel-powered equipment
f) Water the construction area twice daily to minimize fugitive dust
g) Stabilize graded areas as quickly as possible to minimize fugitive dust
h) Pave permanent roads a quickly as possible to minimize dust
i) Use electricity from power poles instead of temporary generators during building, if
available
j) Apply chemical stabilizer or pave the last 100 feet of internal travel path within a
construction site prior to public road entry
k) Install wheel washers adjacent to a paved apron prior to vehicle entry on public roads
1) Remove any visible track-out into traveled public streets within 30minutes of
occurrence
m) Wet wash the construction access point at the end of each workday if any vehicle
travel on unpaved surfaces has occurred
n) Provide sufficient perimeter erosion control to prevent washout of silty material onto
public roads
0) Cover haul trucks or maintain at least 12 inches of freeboard to reduce blow-off
during hauling
p) Suspend all soil disturbance and travel on unpaved surfaces if winds exceed 25 miles
per hour
Hydrology and Water Quality
2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer shall verify that the grading
or construction plans comply with the provisions of California Regional Water Quality
7
Control Board, San Diego Region Order No. 2001-01 with respect to construction related
and pennanent, post-construction water quality best management practices (BMPs).
3. Prior to the issuance of a grading pennit, temporary desilting and erosion control devices
shall be installed. Protective devices will be provided at every stonn drain inlet to
prevent sediment from entering the stonn drain system. These measures shall be reflected
in the grading and improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Noise
4. Pursuant to Section 17.24.050(1) of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, project-related
construction activities shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 .a.m.
Monday through Friday and between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Saturdays and Sundays.
5. Prior to project grading the applicant shall submit an acoustical study for approval by the
Director of Planning and Building, which demonstrates that barriers or setbacks have
been incorporated into the project design, such that noise exposure to residential receivers
placed in useable exterior areas ar below 65dB CNEL.
6. Prior to issuance of building pennits the applicant shall submit an interior acoustical
study for approval by the Director of Planning and Building for those residential units
anticipated to exceed 60 CNEL, as identified in the Otay Ranch Village Six SPA
Amendment; Supplementary Noise Report dated June 15,2005. In confonnance with the
State Unifonn Building Code, the required noise study shall demonstrate that the
structures are designed such that interior noise levels, due to exterior sources, will be at
or below 45 CNEL.
7. Prior to approval of building pennits for commercial development, a report shall be
prepared demonstrating that HV AC equipment is designed to insure that noise levels
from the equipment will not exceed the City ofChula Vista's Noise Ordinance Standards.
Traffic
8. The applicant shall install a fully activated traffic signal at the intersection of East
Palomar Street and View Park Way. The signal shall be installed at the direction of the
City Engineer in conjunction with the construction pennit for the proposed East Palomar
Street modifications.
Utilities and Service Systems
9. Prior to final map approval, the City Engineer shall be satisfied that the Poggi Canyon
Interceptor has adequate capacity to handle interim projected sewage flows or necessary
upgrades to Reach 205 of the Poggi Canyon Interceptor are completed.
G. Consultation
1. Individuals and Organizations
8
City of Chula Vista:
Marisa Lundstedt, Planning and Building
Rick Rosaler, Planning and Building
Harold Phelps, Planning and Building
Mary Venables, Planning and Bulding
Frank Rivera, Engineering
Samir Nuhaily, Engineering
Dave Kaplan, Engineering
Dino Serafini, Engineering
Khosro Aminpour
Beth Chopp, Engineering
Mark Caro, Parks and Recreation
Applicant/Property Owner:
Otay Project L.P.
Others:
Otay Water District
Chula Vista Elementary School District
Charly Bull and David Gottfredson, RECON
2. Documents
The following documents are available for review at the City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth
Avenue:
City ofChula Vista General Plan, 1989 (as amended)
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
Otay Ranch Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Final Second Tier
Environmental Impact Report 98-01, December 2001
Otay Ranch Village Six SPA Amendment; Supplementary Air Quality Report, EDA W,
June 15,2005
Otay Ranch Village Six SPA Amendment; Supplementary Noise Report, EDA W, June
15,2005
Otay Ranch Village 6 GDP/SPA Plan Amendment Drainage/Water Quality
Memorandum, Hunsaker & Associates, March 23, 2005
Otay Ranch Village 6 Mixed Use Project Sewer Service Memorandum, Dexter Wilson
Engineering, April 19, 2005
9
Otay Ranch - Village Six Mixed Use Affordable/Market Housing Project Traffic Impact
Study, Wilson & Company, June 9, 2005
Initial Study
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, and any
comments received in response to the Notice of Initial Study. The report reflects the
independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista. Further information regarding the
environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning and
Building Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
Date:
Marilyn R. F. Ponseggi
Environmental Review Coordinator
J :\Planning\MaryV\ V -6\IS-04-035MND .doc
10
JUN. 14,2005 12:01PM
NO. 834
P. 2
~(/?o
-~-
~~
CI'IY OF
CHUlA VISTA
Planning & BUilding Department
Plannfng Division I Development Proces5ing
APPLICATION · DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING . TYPE B
Part 1
T e of Review Re uested
o General Plan Amendrmml
o General Developm~nt Plan DNew (or) DAmendmem
o SPA/Sper:ific Plan DNew (or) OAml!n~""ent
.N' Zone Change Pc. z.- 0 (0 - D 2-
~ Tentative $ubdlvisiol'l Map Revised
o Annexation r>C?..-D'7- \(i,
o Othflr: "
A lication Information
AppHcantN~me: Otay prOject L.P.
Applicanl Address: 610 West Ash Street, Suite 1500, San Diego, CA 92101
C Ranie Hunter hhone', (619) 234-4050 ext 107
ontact: ' , r
Applicant's Interest in Property (If applicant is not the owner, the owner's authorization signature at the end or this form is requirt'!d
to process this request.) !!JOwn 0 Lease 0 In escrow DOpUon to purchase
Engineer/Agent: Hunsaker & Associates Addre~s:10179 Huennekens St., Ban Diego, C.P., 92121
Contact: Erin Bishop Phone: (858) 558-4500
Primary contact is: [39 Applicant 0 Agent 0 Ema;1 address of primary Contact: rhunter@otayranch.oom
General Project Description lull typos)
Project Name: otay Ranch Village 6 Proposed Use;-.Mi..x.ejl-Use
General Description of Proposed Project: ThE'! proposed project would rezone the CPF-l parcel from Cp!"
to MU and would allocate 158 multi-family units to the MU~1/MU-2 parcels. This would
increase the overall units on the revis~d Tentative Map to 1,494. In addition, the E.
Palomar street section would be revised to increase the overall right-of-way to 154',
providing diagonal pa~king on the ~orth side of E. Palomar St. along the frontage of the
MU-2 parcel. . . .
Subject Property Information (all types)
Location/Street Address: None Yet
Assessor's Parcel #: sec1! attached
General Plan Desigl1ation: CPF / MU
Planhed Community (Ir :Jpplicable): Otay
Currl'!nt Land Us/;!: Vaoant / Graded
Total Acreage: 7 . 3g~s Redevelopment Area (if ~pp'i(:abre): N/A
ZOne Designation; PC (SPA)
Ranch
Within Montgomery Specific Plan? 0 Yes
KJ No
General Plan Amendment
Proposed land Use Designation: N/A
Justification for General Plan change: 'N/A
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
91910
(619) 691.5101
RN 5.03
p~ T/z
JUN. 14.2005 12:02PM
~V~
-
cnvOI'
CHUlA VISfA
NO. 834
P. 3
APPLICATION · DEVELOPMENT PROCESS I NG · TYPE B
Part 2
General Development Plan
General Development Plan Name: NIA
Proposed land Uses! Total Acres:
Commercial /
Parks /
Communlly Purpo~e /
Public/Quasi I
Acres Industrial/ Acres
Acres Schools / Acres
Acres Circulation I Acres
Acres Open Space I Acres
Rosidential! Range:
Single Famiry Detached I
Single Family Altached /
Duplexes /
Apartments I
Condominiums I
TOTALS I
to Units Acres
to Units Acres
to Units Acres
to Units Acres
to Units Acres
to Units Acres
Annexation
Prezoning~ N/A
IAFCO Raference #: N.(A
Tentative Subdivision Map
Subdivision Name: Qtay Ranch Village 6
Minimum lot size: N/A
Number of units:
CV Tract 'IF: TBD
Average 101 size: ~ Sh2@t 4 of TM for breakdown
Zone Change N/A
o Rezoning
Proposed zoning:
o Prezoning
o Setback
Authorization
Prlnlapplicantname:~ ~
Applicant Signature: ..uf::::f~~ ~ ~ Date: June 14, 2005
.';"'Qwn" """"',, ~ . ~
OwnerSignature.:~ ~ ~ Date: June
'Proof of OWner.lhip may be mquired. Letter Dr COn~enl may De provided In lieu of signature,
14, 2005
276 Fourth AvenlJe
Chula Vista I Cafifornia
91910
(619} 691-5101
I Rov S.os J
Pg Z/z
~~~
-.-
~....,;:- -...; -;:....:
""'-........~.......
-.......
P I ann
n g
& Building
Planning Division
Department
Development Processi ng
CIlY OF
CHULA VISTA
APPLICATION . DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING · TYPE B
Part 1
Type of Review Requested
D
D Tentative Subdivision Map
D Annexation
D Other:
':E>fA <0
f&~-04-ie
fc. M - 01- \4
Case #:
Filing Date:
Assigned Planner:
Receipt #:
Project Account:
-64~1
STAFF USE ONLY
Application Information
Applicant Name: Dtay Pro;ect L.P.
Applicant Address: 610 West Ash Street, Ste. 1500, San Diego, CA 92101
Contact: Ranie Hunter Phone: 619-234-4050
Applicant's Interest in Property (If applicant is not the owner, the owner's authorization signature at the end of this form is required
to process this request.) [JOwn D lease D In escrow D Option to purchase
Engineer/Agent: Hunsaker & Associates Address: 10179 Huennekens, San Dieqo
Contact: Lex Wi 11 j man
Primary contact is: [;J Applicant D Agent
Phone:
D Email address of primary contact:
General Project Description (all types)
Project Nameyillage 6 Mixed Use Affordable/Market HOmptO\5bsed Use: Mul ti-Family Residen,t~al/Com '1
a&7;~l. if,' jr1F fUvlt"5
General Description of Proposed Project: Proposal to rezone CPF-l site to RM2.1 and assign 47
multi-family units to MU-l site to permit development of a mixed-use villaqe core.
Location/Street Address:
Assessor's Parcel #: 643-051-23, -24
Subject Property Information (all types)
E. Palomar Street, otay Ranch Village Six
General Plan Designation: PC
Planned Community (if applicable): Otay Ranch
Current land Use: Graded Vacant Sites
Total Acreage: 6.7 Redevelopment Area (if applicable):
Zone Designation: MU/CPF
Village Six
N/A
Within Montgomery Specific Plan? DYes
[K] No
General Plan Amendment
Proposed land Use Designation: PC
Justification for General Plan change: Allocate 158 additional MF units to village 6 to
facilitate development of mixed use, commercial, affordable and market rate
multi-family project.
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
91910
(619) 691-5101
~, ft...
-:-:~--:
-
CIlY OF
CHUIA VISTA
APPLICATION · DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING · TYPE B
Part 2
General Development plan
General Development Plan Name: otay Ranch
Proposed Land Uses / Total Acres:
Commercial/ 3.0 Acres(Mixed-Use)
Parks / Acres
Community Purpose / Acres
Public/Quasi / Acres
Industrial/
Schools /
Circulation /
Open Space /
Acres
Acres
'Acres
Acres
Residential/Range:
Single Family Detached /
Single Family Attached /
Duplexes /
Apartments /
Condominiums /
to Units Acres
to Units Acres
to Units Acres
to Units Acres
to 158 Units 6.7 Acres
to Units Acres
TOTALS /
Annexation
Prezoning:
N/A
lAFCO Reference #:
Tentative Subdivision Map
Subdivision Name: otay Ranch Village 6
CV Tract #:
02-05
Minimum lot size:
Number of units:
Average lot size:
Zone Change
EJ Rezoning
Proposed zoning:
D Prezoning D Setback
Rezone CPF-l Site from CPF to RM2
Authorization
Print applicant name:
Applicant Signature:
Date:
Pd", own,e, name', . ~ota y Project L. p, '1i ... _ . ___.__
Owner s'9noture':(~Xr;. ~ Dole:
'Proof of ownership maybe required, Letter of consent may be provided in lieu of signature,
&//&/01-
, I
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
91910
(619) 691-5101
Rev 5.03
Pg 2/2
~ ~ f?.
-.-
~...,;;-""'-...,;;-...;;:
~~~~
p I ann
n g
& Building
Planning Division
Department
Development Processing
cnv OF
CHUlA VI Sf A
APPLICATION APPENDIX A
Project Description & Justification
Project Name:
Village Six Mixed-Use Affordable/Market Multi-Family Project
Otay Project L.P.
Applicant Name:
Please fully describe the proposed project, any and all construction that may be accomplished as a result of approval of
this project, and the project's benefits to yourself, the property, the neighborhood, and the City of Chula vista. Include any
details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may include any
background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use
an addendum sheet if necessary.
For all Conditional Use Permits or Variances, please address the required "findings" as listed in the Application Procedural
Guide.
This proposal is to authorize 158 additional multi-family units to Otay Ranch
Village 6 to facilitate the development of a vibrant mixed-use project within the
Village 6 core. The project will include 158 multi-family for-sale affordable
and market rate homes, and approximately 17,000 sf. of commercial/retail uses
(including a for profit daycare facility). This project will provide for sale
low income affordable units in close proximity to the future transit stop,
elementary school and public park, all within the Village Six core.
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
91910
(619) 691-5101
~~f?-
-.--
':"~""'-~~
1IiII,....................~
....... -.....
p I ann
n g
& Building
Planning Division
Department
Development Processing
CITY OF
CHUlA VISTA
APPLICATION APPENDIX B
Disclosure Statement
Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters that will require discretionary action by the Council,
Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial
interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista election must be filed, The following information
must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subject of the application or the
contract, e,g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier,
Jim Baldwin
Ai Baldwin
otay Project L.P.
2. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals with
a $2000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) entity.
Ai Baldwin
Jim Baldwin
3. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person
serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
N/A
4. Please identify every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have
assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
Jim Baldwin Rohprr r~mpron
Ai Baldwln Kent Aden
Kim John Kilkenny Ranie Hunter
5. Has any person* associated with this contract had any financial dealings with an official** of the City of Chula
Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months. Yes No~
If Yes, briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official** may have in this contract.
6. Have you made a contribution of more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the
Chula Vista City Council? No ~ Yes _ If yes, which Council member?
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
91910
(619) 691-5101
~~~
-.-
~~""...o;:...;;:
~~-~
p I ann
n g
& Building
Planni ng Division
Department
Development Processing
CIlY OF
CHULA VISTA
APPLICATION APPENDIX B
Disclosure Statement - Page 2
7. Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official** of the City of Chula Vista in the
past twelve (12) months? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc.)
Yes No~
If Yes, which official** and what was the nature of item provided?
Date:
w ((0 lot--
~L~
Signature of Contractor/Applicant
Print or
type name of Contractor/Applicant
*
Person is defined as: any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, district, or other
political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit.
**
Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, Council member, Planning Commissioner, Member of a board,
commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staff members.
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
91910
(619) 691-5101
~~~
-.-
':"..,;;'" "" '""=-,;
.......- ...............
.,.,......... ---..
p I ann
n g
& Building
Planning Division
Department
Development Processing
CllY OF
CHUlA VISTA
APPLICATION APPENDIX C
Development Permit Processing Agreement
Permit Applicant:
Applicant's Address:
Type of Permit:
Agreement Date:
Deposit Amount:
otay Project L.P.
610 West Ash Street, Ste. 1500, San Diego, CA 92101
GDP/SPA Amendment
This Agreement ("Agreement") between the City of Chula Vista, a chartered municipal corporation ("City") and the
forenamed applicant for a development permit ("Applicant"), effective as of the Agreement Date set forth above, is made
with reference to the following facts:
Whereas, Applicant has applied to the City for a permit of the type aforereferenced ("Permit") which the City has
required to be obtained as a condition to permitting Applicant to develop a parcel of property; and,
Whereas, the City will incur expenses in order to process said permit through the various departments and before
the various boards and commissions of the City ("Processing Services"); and,
Whereas the purpose of this agreement is to reimburse the City for all expenses it will incur in connection with
providing the Processing Services;
Now, therefore, the parties do hereby agree, in exchange for the mutual promises herein contained, as follows:
1. Applicant's Duty to Pay,
Applicant shall pay all of City's expenses incurred in providing Processing Services related to Applicant's Permit, including
all of City's direct and overhead costs related thereto. This duty of Applicant shall be referred to herein as "Applicant's
Duty to Pay."
1.1. Applicant's Deposit Duty,
As partial performance of Applicant's Duty to Pay, Applicant shall deposit the amount aforereferenced ("Deposit").
1.1.1. City shall charge its lawful expenses incurred in providing Processing Services against
Applicant's Deposit. If, after the conclusion of processing Applicant's Permit, any portion of the
Deposit remains, City shall return said balance to Applicant without interest thereon. If, during the
processing of Applicant's Permit, the amount of the Deposit becomes exhausted, or is imminently
likely to become exhausted in the opinion of the e City, upon notice of same by City, Applicant
shall forthwith provide such additional deposit as City shall calculate as reasonably necessary to
continue Processing Services. The duty of Applicant to initially deposit and to supplement said
deposit as herein required shall be known as "Applicant's Deposit Duty",
2, City's Duty.
City shall, upon the condition that Applicant is no in breach of Applicant's Duty to Payor Applicant's Deposit Duty,
use good faith to provide processing services in relation to Applicant's Permit application.
2.1, City shall have no liability hereunder to Applicant for the failure to process Applicant's Permit application, or
for failure to process Applicant's Permit within the time frame requested by Applicant or estimated by City,
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
91910
(619) 691-5101
~~~
-.-
':'...:;;:"'---~~
~--...-~
p I ann
n g
&
Building
Planning Division I
Department
Development Processing
CllY OF
CHUlA VISfA
Development Permit Processing Agreement - Page 2
2.2. By execution of this agreement Applicant shall have no right to the Permit for which Applicant has applied.
City shall use its discretion in valuating Applicant's Permit Application without regard to Applicant's. promise to pay for the
Processing Services, or the execution of the Agreement.
3. Remedies,
3.1. Suspension of Processing
In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City shall otherwise have at law or equity, the City has
the right to suspend and/or withhold the processing of the Permit which is the subject matter of this Agreement, as well as
the Permit which may be the subject matter of any other Permit which Applicant has before the City.
3.2. Civil Collection
In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City shall otherwise have at law or equity, the City has
the right to collect all sums which are or may become due hereunder by civil action, and upon instituting litigation to collect
same, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs.
4. Miscellaneous.
4.1 Notices.
All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in
writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served
if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or
certified, with return receipt requested at the addresses identified adjacent to the signatures of the parties represented.
4.2 Governing LawNenue.
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San
Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible, Venue for this
Agreement, and performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista.
4.3. Multiple Signatories.
If there are multiple signatories to this agreement on behalf of Applicant, each of such signatories shall be
jointly and severally liable for the performance of Applicant's duties herein set forth.
4.4, Signatory Authority.
This signatory to this agreement hereby warrants and represents that he is the duly designated agent for the
Applicant and has been duly authorized by the Applicant to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Applicant. Signatory
shall be personally liable for Applicant's Duty to Pay and Applicant's Duty to Deposit in the event he has not been
authorized to execute this Agreement by Applicant.
4,5 Hold Harmless.
Applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and
employees, from and against any claims, suits, actions or proceedings, judicial or administrative, for writs, orders,
injunction or other relief, damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of
City's actions in processing or issuing Applicant's Permit, or in exercising any discretion related thereto including but not
limited to the giving of proper environmental review, the holding of public hearings, the extension of due process rights,
except only for those claims, suits, actions or proceedings arising from the sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the
City, its officers, or employees known to, but not objected to, by the Applicant. Applicant's indemnification shall include
any and all costs, expenses, attorney's fees and liability incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees in
defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to judgement or not. Further, Applicant, at its own expense,
shall, upon written request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents, or
employees. Applicant's indemnification of City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
91910
(619) 691-5101
~~~
-.-
~~~....a:1ii:
.......""-"-~
....... ~
p I ann
n g
& Building
Planning Division
Department
Development Processing
CIlY OF
CHULA VISTA
Development Permit Processing Agreement - Page 3
Applicant. At its sole discretion, the City may participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such
participation shall not relieve the applicant of any obligation imposed by this condition.
4.6 Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures.
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement against the City unless a claim has first been
presented in writing and filed with the City of Chula Vista and acted upon by the City of Chula Vista in accordance with the
procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the
provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and procedures used
by the City in the implementation of same. Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City
for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement.
Now therefore, the parties hereto, having read and understood the terms and conditions of this agreement, do
hereby express their consent to the terms hereof by setting their hand hereto on the date set forth adjacent thereto.
Dated:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA
By:
Dated:
@/lb!o4
.~
/
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
91910
(619) 691-5101
RESOLUTION NO. PCM-04-18
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
RESOLUTIONS AMENDING THE OT A Y RANCH GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN (GDP), THE VILLAGE SIX SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, A REVISED TENTATIVE MAP,
AND A ZONE CHANGE ORDINANCE FOR A MIXED-USE
PROJECT IN OT A Y RANCH VILLAGE SIX.
..
WHEREAS, the two amendments, tentative map and zone change which are the subject
matter of this resolution and are identified in exhibits attached to the three draft City Council
Resolutions and draft City Council Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, applications (pCM -04-18, PCM -04-19, PCS-05-16 and PCZ-06-02) to amend
the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP), Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan,
Tentative Map and Zone Change were filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building
Department on June 24,2004 and June 14,2005 by Otay Project, LP, The Otay Ranch Company
("Applicant"); and,
WHEREAS, the application (PCM -04-18) request an amendment to the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan (GDP) text for the Village Setting, Description (acreage and unit counts), Land
Use Table and Parks and Open Space Policies ("Project"); and,
WHEREAS, the application (PCM -04-19) request an amendment to the Otay Ranch Village
Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Site Utilization Plan Map by re-designating the 3.7 -acre
parcel on the north side of East Palomar Street from Community Purpose Facility (CPF-l) to Mixed-
Use (MU - 2), and re-designating a 0.7 -acre portion ofthe existing 3 .O-acre Mixed-Use (MU -1) parcel
on the south side of East Palomar Street from Mixed-Use (MU-l) to Community Purpose Facility
(CPF-3). The existing 1.5-acre Private Swim Club and Park (CPF-lx) will be re-named CPF-l
("Project"); and,
WHEREAS, the application (PCS-05-16) requests the approval for the subdivision of a 3.0-
acre and a 3.7-acre parcel of land on each side of the terminus of East Palomar Street located
between View Park Way and Magdalena Avenue within Otay Ranch Village Six SPA into 158
condominium lots; and
WHEREAS, the application (PCZ-06-02) is a request to rezone a portion ofthe Otay Ranch
Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Planned Community (PC) District Regulations Land Use
District Map, rezoning the 3.7-acre site on the north side of East Palomar Street from CPF to MU'
and rezoning a 0.7-acre portion ofthe 3.0-acre site on the south side of East Palomar Street from MU
to CPF ("Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has conducted an Initial Study, IS-04-
035 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Based upon the results of the
Initial Study, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the project could result in
significant effects on the environment. However, revisions to the project made by or agreed to by the
applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects
would occur; therefore, the Environmental Review Coordinator has prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration,IS-04-035.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (IS-04-035) has been prepared in accordance with the
requirements ofthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Environmental Review
Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and,
WHEREAS, the Resource Conservation Commission determined that the initial study was
adequate and recommended adoption ofthe Mitigated Negative Declaration as to the effects ofthe
proposal on the environment on August 29, 2005 in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said Project
and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of
general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the Project site at least ten days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
6:00 p.m., September 14,2005, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed.
WHEREAS, said hearing was conducted at 6:00 p.m., September 14,2005, in the Council
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter
closed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, from the facts presented to the
Planning Commission, the Commission has determined that the approval ofthe Project is consistent
with the Chula Vista Municipal Code, City of Chula Vista General Plan, the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan, Otay Ranch Village Six SPA Plan, and all other applicable Plans, and that the
public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good planning practice support the approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the City Council adopt the attached draft Resolutions approving the amendment to the Otay
Ranch General Development Plan (GDP), Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, and
approving the revised tentative map with the findings and conditions in said resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the City Council adopt the attached draft Ordinance amending the Otay Ranch Village Six
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Planned Community District Regulations Land Use Districts Plan
Map.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of the property and the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA
VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 14th day of September, 2005 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
Vicki Madrid, Chair
ATTEST:
Diana Vargas, Secretary
J :\PLANNING\HAROLD\REsOLUTIONS\PCM -04-18PCREso.DOC
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OTAY
RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (GDP) TO ALLOW
ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN OT A Y
RANCH VILLAGE SIX.
WHEREAS, the attached Exhibit "A" is commonly known as the amended text for the
Village Six Setting, Description (acreage and unit counts), Land Use Table and Parks and Open
Space Policies exhibit; and,
WHEREAS, an amendment application (PCM-04-18) to the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan (GDP) was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building
Department on June 24, 2004 by Otay Project, LP, The Otay Ranch Company ("Applicant"); and,
WHEREAS, the application request an amendment to the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan (GDP) text for the Village Six Setting, Description (acreage and unit counts),
Land Use Table and Parks and Open Space Policies ("Project"); and,
WHEREAS, The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the Project
and determined that the Project would require a Mitigated Negative Declaration to the Final
Environmental Impact Report for the Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and
Tentative Maps (Final EIR 98-01); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said
Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of
the exterior boundaries of the Project site at least ten days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m.,
September 14, 2005, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
WHEREAS, by a vote of X-X-X-X the Planning Commission recommended approval
the project; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was scheduled before the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista on said Project; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows:
Resolution No.
Page 2
I. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their
public hearing held on September 14, 2005, and the minutes and resolutions resulting
therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. These documents,
along with any documents submitted to the decision makers, shall comprise the entire
record of the proceedings for any California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) claims.
II. ACTION
The City Council hereby approves the amendment to the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan (GDP) text for the Village Six Setting, Description (acreage and unit
counts), Land Use Table and Parks and Open Space Policies to allow for additional
residential development in Otay Ranch Village Six. The approval of the amendment is
based upon findings contained herein and is consistent with the City of Chula Vista
General Plan, the Otay Ranch General Development Plan, and all other applicable Plans,
and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good planning and zoning
practice support their approval and implementation.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has conducted an Initial
Study, 1S-04-035 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Based
upon the results of the Initial Study, the Environmental Review Coordinator has
detennined that the project could result in significant effects on the environment.
However, revisions to the project made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur;
therefore, the Environmental Review Coordinator has prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration, 1S-04-035.
IV. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (IS-04-035) has been prepared in
accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
State CEQA Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula
Vista, and hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program (1S-04-035).
V. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council does hereby find that in the exercise of their independent review and
judgment, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program (18-04-035) in the fonn presented has been prepared in accordance with
Resolution No.
Page 3
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the
Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and hereby adopts the same.
VI. CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN
The proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan for the following reasons:
A. THE PROPOSED OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
(GDP) AMENDMENT IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CHULA VISTA
GENERAL PLAN.
The Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) amendment to text for the
Village Six Setting, Description (acreage and unit counts), Land Use Table and
Parks and Open Space Policies is consistent with the existing land uses,
circulation system, open space and recreational uses, and public facility uses
within Village Six as depicted currently in the Otay Ranch General Development
Plan and Chula Vista General Plan.
B. THE PROPOSED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (GDP)
AMENDMENT WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED
DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA.
The Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) amendment to text for the
Village Six Setting, Description (acreage and unit counts), Land Use Table and
Parks and Open Space Policies does not affect the remaining development of
Village Six SPA Plan area, which is nearly built-out.
C. THE PROPOSED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (GDP)
AMENDMENT WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND
USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION OR
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
The land uses within Otay Ranch Village Six SPA Plan area are designed for
residential enjoyment and convenience. The proposed amendment will allow for
the development of convenient neighborhood amenities as promoted by the goals
and objectives of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan. A comprehensive
street network serves the Project and provides for access to off-site adjacent
properties.
Resolution No.
Page 4
VII. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon its adoption
Presented by
Approved as to fonn by
Jim Sandoval
Planning and Building Director
Ann Moore
City Attorney
Resolution No.
Page 5
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 4th day of October 2005, by the following vote:
AYES: Council members:
NAYS: Council members:
ABSENT: Council members:
ABSTAIN: Council members:
Stephen C. Padilla, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA)
I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a
regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 4th day of October 2005.
Executed this 4th day of October 2005.
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
J :\PLANNING\HAROLD\REsOLUTIONS\PCM -04-18CCRESO.DOC
Otay Ranch GDP/ SRP L . J.rt II
6. Village Six
a. Village Six Setting
Village Six is comprised of approximately .,JlliLa,cre.s .located i_nuth.",..- . { Deleted: 365
central portion of the Otay Valley Parcel, south of Poggi Canyon
and east of the extension of La Media Road,
Open Space and Habitat: Village Six does not contain significant
natural resources, as it has historically been used for agricultural
purposes, The undulating slopes of eastern Poggi Canyon define
the northern edge of the village,
Land Use: Village Six is located in the interior of the Otay Valley
Parcel, surrounded by land used for agricultural purposes, The
village is surrounded by Villages Five, Seven, and Two to the north,
south, and west, and the Freeway Commercial site to the east,
across SR-125, Village Six is located immediately west of the
proposed SR-125.
Visual: Village Six contains distant views to the mountains to the
east, southeast, and northeast. Scenic values exist along Poggi
Canyon, an open space scenic corridor.
Relationship to Other Otay Ranch Villages: Village Six is
intended to have a close relationship with Village Five, to the
north, connected with light rail transit connection,
b. Village Six Description
Village Six is an urban village with a transit/rail line. Urban
Villages are adjacent to existing urban development and are
planned for transit oriented development with higher densities and
mixed uses in the village cores, Village Six contains:
{ Deleted: 990
_' { Deleted: 1,242
.' { Deleted: 6,335
o
A maximum of .941singlefaJ11ily resideI1tial units
A maximum of.1,449 multHaJ11ily resicleI1tialllnits.
Build-out population of approximately f5.736
----.--
o
------------
o
o A village core area containing:
Commercial uses in a mixed use setting
Public and community purpose facilities
A bus/rail line stop
An elementary school
Multi-family residential
A Town Square/Village Green/Main Street
Affordable Housing
Neighborhood Park
Adopted October 28, 1993
Amended June 4, 1996
Proposed Revision June 15, 2004
Page 144
Otay Ranch GDPj SRP L, art II
Villaae 6
Total
Use SF MF Tot I Res Den Park CPF Sch C'ml OS Art Ac PoP'
LMV 941 - 94 192,0 4,9 192,0 3011
MU - 47 4 3,0 15,7 7.6 13,7 . 24,3 150
MH - 1402 140 79,8 17,6 10,0 89,8 3575
Other - - - - 22,0 58,3 80.3
Total 941 1449 239 274,8 7,6 13,7 10.0 - 22.0 58,3 386.4 6736
I
'Commercial Acreaqe included in MU cateqory,
Exhibit 48 Village Six land Use Table
Adopted October 28, 1993
Amended June 4, 1996
Proposed Revision June 15, 2004
c. Village Six Policies
Village Character Policies:
o The village character should be guided by the following
qualities:
Location adjacent to Poggi Canyon, an open space scenic
corridor.
Location along the proposed light rail transit route.
Views to the mountains on the east, southeast, and
northeast.
Compatibility and linkage with Villages Two and Seven,
o Village Six shall promote uses and activities which encourage
ridership, and services for transit users,
Village Core Policies:
o
A trolley stop and/or station shall be approximately located at
the SPA level and will be conditioned for dedication at the
Tentative Map level in the village core.
The number of homes identified for the village core is a
minimum and may not be reduced,
o
o
Some services for users outside the village may be provided in
the village core,
The village core shall be sited to ensure its separation from the
regional uses in the Eastern Urban Center.
o
Page 145
.. { Formatted Table
Otay Ranch GDP/ SRP u , ..lrt II
Parks and Open Space Policies:
Application of the 3 acres per 1,000 residents standard would
result in the development of.;;?0.6acresofloCc1lParksinVi!lage:::;ix,
To satisfy this requirement, 12.9 acres of neighborhood
parks/town square are planned. The remaining obligation is
satisfied through the provision of community parks in Villages ..1.__.-..-
,arId tl1eEUC,
The following policies shall guide the design of parks and open
spaces in Village Six:
o Open space areas adjacent to Poggi Canyon identified on the
GDP / SRP Land Use Map shall be preserved outside of
individual private lots, Open space character along the canyon
shall conform to landscape concepts developed at the SPA level
and the guidelines established in the Overall Ranch Design
Plan, Setbacks and landscaping shall be provided along East
Orange Avenue in keeping with open space scenic corridor
guidelines in the Overall Ranch Design Plan (requirements set
forth in Section E, Implementation).
o Potential SR-125 shall be considered in the placement of uses
and buffers,
o A modest landscaped buffer shall be provided along the village
edge, due to the absence of significant environmental
constraints,
o Pedestrian links to other villages and the overall greenbelt,
open space, and recreational systems shall be provided in
Village Six,
o Lot lines and grading shall not extend into the open space
scenic corridor along Poggi Canyon,
Other Village Six Policies
o
Site planning shall minimize noise impacts and conflicts with
SR-125,
o
Light rail transit line rights-of-way shall be approximately
located at the SPA level and will be conditioned for dedication
at the Tentative Map level in the village core,
Landform grading guidelines for the edge of Poggi Canyon shall
be developed as part of the Village Design Plan at the SPA level.
These specific guidelines shall be consistent with the definition
and standards established in the Overall Ranch Design Plan.
o
Adopted October 28, 1993
Amended June 4, 1996
Proposed Revision June 15, 2004
Page 146
. { Deleted: 19.0
{ Deleted: 2
. { Deleted: ,
. { Deleted: 10
Generdl Development r-'Ian
Village Six Land Use Plan
Buffet and Land Use Design
10 Minimize Freeway Impacts
Open Space
Scenic Corridor
Some Complementary
Relationship with
village 2
Trans"RJght~~vvay
ReservatJon with Stop
at vmageCore
76-foot Average
Buffer Arong
Arterials
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OT A Y
RANCH VILLAGE SIX SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA)
SITE UTILIZATION PLAN MAP
WHEREAS, the attached Exhibit "A" is commonly known as the Site Utilization Plan
Map exhibit; and,
WHEREAS, an amendment application (PCM-04-19) to the Otay Ranch Village Six
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning and
Building Department on June 24, 2004 by Otay Project, LP, The Otay Ranch Company
("Applicant"); and,
WHEREAS, the application request an amendment to the Otay Ranch Village Six
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Site Utilization Plan Map by re-designating the 3.7 -acre
parcel on the north side of East Palomar Street from Community Purpose Facility (CPF-l) to
Mixed-Use (MU-2), and re-designating a 0.7-acre portion of the existing 3.0-acre Mixed-Use
(MU-l) parcel on the south side of East Palomar Street from Mixed-Use (MU-l) to Community
Purpose Facility (CPF-3). The existing 1.5-acre Private Swim Club and Park (CPF-lx) will be
re-named CPF-l ("Project"); and,
WHEREAS, The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the Project
and detennined that the Project would require a Mitigated Negative Declaration to the Final
Environmental Impact Report for the Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and
Tentative Maps (Final EIR 98-01); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said
Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of
the exterior boundaries ofthe Project site at least ten days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m.,
September 14, 2005, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
WHEREAS, by a vote of X-X-X-X the Planning Commission recommended approval
the project; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was scheduled before the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista on said Project; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby find, detennine, resolve and order as follows:
Resolution No.
Page 2
I. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their
public hearing held on September 14, 2005, and the minutes and resolutions resulting
therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. These documents,
along with any documents submitted to the decision makers, shall comprise the entire
record of the proceedings for any California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) claims.
II. ACTION
The City Council hereby approves the amendment to the Otay Ranch Village Six SPA
Plan, amending the Otay Ranch Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Site
Utilization Plan Map by re-designating the 3.7-acre parcel on the north side of East
Palomar Street from Community Purpose Facility (CPF-l) to Mixed-Use (MU-2), and re-
designating a 0.7-acre portion of the existing 3.0-acre Mixed-Use (MU-l) parcel on the
south side of East Palomar Street from Mixed-Use (MU-l) to Community Purpose
Facility (CPF-3). The existing 1.5-acre Private Swim Club and Park (CPF-lx) will be re-
named CPF-l. The approval of the amendment is based upon findings contained herein
and is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan, and all other applicable Plans, and that the public necessity,
convenience, general welfare and good planning and zoning practice support their
approval and implementation.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has conducted an Initial
Study, 1S-04-035 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Based
upon the results of the Initial Study, the Environmental Review Coordinator has
determined that the project could result in significant effects on the environment.
However, revisions to the project made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur;
therefore, the Environmental Review Coordinator has prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration, 1S-04-035.
IV. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (1S-04-035) has been prepared in
accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
State CEQA Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula
Vista, and hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program (1S-04-035).
Resolution No.
Page 3
V. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council does hereby find that in the exercise of their independent review and
judgment, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program (IS-04-035) in the form presented has been prepared in accordance with
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the
Environmental Review Procedures of the City ofChula Vista and hereby adopts the same.
VI. SPA PLAN FINDINGS
A. THE OTAY RANCH VILLAGE SIX-SPA PLAN AMENDMENT IS IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AND CITY OF CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN.
The Otay Ranch Village Six SPA Plan amendment to the Site Utilization Plan
Map re-designating the 3.7-acre parcel on the north side of East Palomar Street
from Community Purpose Facility (CPF-I) to Mixed-Use (MU-2), re-designating
a 0.7-acre portion of the existing 3.0-acre Mixed-Use (MU-I) parcel on the south
side of East Palomar Street from Mixed-Use (MU-I) to Community Purpose
Facility (CPF-3), and re-naming the existing 1.5-acre Private Swim Club and Park
from CPF-lx to CPF-I is consistent with the Otay Ranch General Development
Plan and Chula Vista General Plan.
B. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE OTAY RANCH VILLAGE
SIX-SPA PLAN WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED
DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA.
The Otay Ranch Village Seven SPA Plan amendment involves a site utilization
plan map modification, and will not affect the orderly sequentialized development
of the said SPA, which is already nearly completed.
C. THE PROPOSED OT A Y RANCH VILLAGE SIX-SPA PLAN
AMENDMENT WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND
USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION OR
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
The proposed amendment will not adversely affect adjacent land uses or
residential enjoyment, circulation or environmental quality. The proposed
amendment should actually improve residential enjoyment, circulation and
environmental quality with the development of a viable village core, which will
provide for a two-sided mixed-use retail commercial and live-work shopkeeper
unit within the project site in addition to the I 58-for sale condominiums.
The provision of improved open space amenities on each of the privately owned
properties will improve aesthetics, circulation, and pedestrian orientation
Resolution No.
Page 4
amenities within the neighborhood, promoting by the goals and objectives of the
Otay Ranch General Development Plan. A comprehensive street network serves
the Project and provides for access to adjacent properties.
D. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL AND RESEARCH USES,
THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA,
LOCATION, AND OVERALL DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS ARE SUCH AS TO CREATE A RESEARCH OR
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED DESIRABILITY AND
STABILITY; AND, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THIS TITLE.
The Project does not involve areas planned for industrial or research uses.
E. IN THE CASE OF INSTITUTIONAL, RECREATIONAL, AND OTHER
SIMILAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT
WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA, LOCATION AND OVER-ALL
PLANNING TO THE PURPOSE PROPOSED, AND THAT
SURROUNDING AREAS ARE PROTECTED FROM ANY ADVERSE
EFFECTS FROM SUCH DEVELOPMENT.
The Project does not involve these Institutional, Recreational or similar uses.
F. THE STREET AND THOROUGHFARES PROPOSED ARE SUITABLE
AND ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC
THEREON.
The circulation system depicted in the Village Six SPA Plan is consistent with the
Circulation system identified on the City's General Plan and Otay Ranch General
Development Plan and contains adequate internal circulation consistent with the
policies of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan and the City's General
Plan. The traffic study provided for the Mitigated Negative Declaration 1S-04-035
showed that there would not be the need for any additional signalization due to the
increased number of units proposed for the project.
G. ANY PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE JUSTIFIED
ECONOMICALLY AT THE LOCATION (S) PROPOSED AND WILL
PROVIDE ADEQUATE COMMERCIAL FACILITIES OF THE TYPES
NEEDED AT SUCH PROPOSED LOCATION (S).
The proposed amendment will allow for a two-sided mixed-use commercial
village core, with 20,000-sq. ft. of retail commercial suites on the south side of
East Palomar Street and 20 live-work shopkeeper unit on the north side of East
Palomar Street within the project site enhanced by the addition to the 158-for sale
condominiums built-in customer base.
Resolution No.
Page 5
H. THE AREA SURROUNDING SAID DEVELOPMENT CAN BE PLANNED
AND ZONED IN COORDINATION AND SUBSTANTIAL
COMPATIBILITY WITH SAID DEVELOPMENT.
The Village Six SPA Plan is consistent with the approved plans and regulations
applicable to surrounding areas and therefore, said development can be planned
and zoned in coordination and substantial compatibility with said development.
The proposed amendment to the Village Six SPA Plan is consistent with the Otay
Ranch General Development Plan and Chula Vista General Plan.
VII. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon its adoption
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Jim Sandoval
Planning and Building Director
Ann Moore
City Attorney
Resolution No.
Page 6
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 4th day of October 2005, by the following vote:
AYES: Council members:
NAYS: Council members:
ABSENT: Council members:
ABSTAIN: Council members:
Stephen C. Padilla, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA)
I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a
regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 4th day of October 2005.
Executed this 4th day of October 2005.
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
J :\PLANNING\HAROLD\RESOLUTIONS\PCM-04-19CCRESO.DOC
c
C'O
-
a..
c
o
.-
......
C'O
N
.-
-
.-
.....
::)
(1)
......
.-
(f)
O(O~1jjI,/')r-NO
~~...tu)"';"';0<d.n
>~
c
l>
~~~;:~@::~E
>c
:>
mtD,.....fOCOU) ~ CC
~~~~gt:::2 ~
gc; ~m:2~ :!J fg
N ""'..-N<"J ~.....
M
..
N
'"
ri
~ ,
:f(,.JOM~""'u;J'<t." O(oI'-(Or-........ I'- M anco
.<ricQ......:o.ridrriciQj: ,...,:ci.....;......:Nt'~r.Drti ~ ('.i";'
~N.....NMN.....N~ ....._N_.....~ ~ ~~
~
~
;:)~LLu...LL.LLLl...lL.
~ ~tI)V)(J)CI)V)(J)lI)
~ ...J
~
..
E
~ -J g
~ :5 ~"7~~'?1'u;>~
~ ~ to::oca:D::o:::a::a::
-g ~ ~
~ ~
LL I..L.. LL u.. LL I.L ::>
~:E::E:=::i:E ::::i:
~~~~~~ ~
a::a:n:::~tt:r:t: :E
Lt>."":~~tX:~C!("') <o:t
......O;:;:~t-~~ ~
~
d;
o
~
g
-~ ~
LL. LL.. LL. g.c.31: Co
a..a..a...c.~:;tf)
uuu~:;a..8.
j 0
0:
u..
C/)
d:
)(~N
~~t~~;L8
UUU
~.... an
i:"...t =:
1[. :e
~i 'I' ~
.fL> I W
'-'I _.
...J
<(
I-
o
I-
litlf 1~llh !
iUh IjUi 'Us1j ;
~f~1 ~rfil j! ~ "'
I ~~I I ~ !~!r .i~i ~
:J ~"!J ~Uft 4") 0
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE TO THE OTAY
RANCH VILLAGE SIX SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA)
PLANNED COMMUNITY (PC) DISTRICT REGULATIONS LAND
USE DISTRICTS MAP.
WHEREAS, the Otay Ranch Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Planned
Community (PC) District Regulations Land Use Districts Plan Map is the subject matter of this
ordinance and identified as Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and,
WHEREAS, a zone change application to the Otay Ranch Village Six Sectional Planning
Area (SPA) Planned Community (PC) Land Use Districts Plan Map was filed with the City ofChula
Vista Planning and Building Department on June 14,2005 by Otay Project, LP, The Otay Ranch
Company ("Applicant"); and,
WHEREAS, the application is a request to rezone a portion ofthe Otay Ranch Village Six
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Planned Community (PC) District Regulations Land Use District
Map, rezoning the 3.7-acre site on the north side of East Palomar Street from CPF to MU, and
rezoning a 0.7-acre portion ofthe 3.0-acre site on the south side of East Palomar Street from MU to
CPF ("Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Otay Ranch Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Planned
Community (PC) District Regulations Land Use Districts Map, establishes zoning pursuant to Title
19 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, specifically Chapter 19.48 (PC) Planned Community Zone,
and are applicable to the Otay Ranch Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Otay Ranch Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Planned
Community (PC) District Regulations Land Use Districts Map and will be modified to reflect the re-
zoning of the 3.7-acre site on the north side of East Palomar Street from CPF to MU, and the
rezoning of a 0.7-acre portion ofthe 3.0-acre site on the south side of East Palomar Street from MU
to CPF; and,
WHEREAS, the development has been the subject matter of Village Six Sectional Planning
Area (SPA) Plan previously approved by the City Council, wherein the City Council, in the
environmental evaluation of said SPA Plan, relied in part on the Otay Ranch Village Six Final EIR
98-01; and,
WHEREAS, the Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan refines and implements the
land plans, goals, objectives and policies ofthe Otay Ranch GDP as adopted by the City Council of
the City ofChula Vista on October, 28, 1993, and as amended on May 14, 1996, and November 10,
1998; and,
WHEREAS, The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the Project and
Ordinance No.
Page 2
determined that the Project would require a Mitigated Negative Declaration to the Final
Environmental Impact Report for the Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Tentative
Maps (Final EIR 98-01); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said Zone
Change (PCZ-06-02) and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within
500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project site at least ten days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m.
September 14, 2005, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission
and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
WHEREAS, by a vote of X- X- X-X, the Planning Commission recommended approval he
project; and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was scheduled before the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista adopting the ordinance to modify the Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Planned
Community (PC) District Regulations Land Use District Plan Map; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council ofthe City ofChula Vista does hereby ordain as
follows:
I. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public
hearing on said ordinance was held on September 14,2005 and the minutes and resolution
there from, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. These documents,
along with any documents submitted to the decision makers, shall comprise the entire record
ofthe proceedings for any California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) claims.
II. ACTION
The City Council hereby rezone a portion ofthe Otay Ranch Village Six Sectional Planning
Area (SPA) Planned Community (PC) District Regulations Land Use District Map, rezoning
the 3.7-acre site on the north side of East Palomar Street from CPF to MU, and rezoning a
0.7-acre portion ofthe 3.0-acre site on the south side of East Palomar Street from MU to CPF
as identified on the revised Land Use District Plan Map Exhibit "A," finding that it is
consistent with the City ofChula Vista General Plan, the Otay Ranch General Development
Plan, Otay Ranch Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, and all other
applicable Plans, and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good
planning and zoning practice support their approval and implementation.
Ordinance No.
Page 3
III. ENVIRONMENT AL DETERMINATION
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance
with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and has conducted an Initial Study, IS-04-035
in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Based upon the results ofthe
Initial Study, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the project could
result in significant effects on the environment. However, revisions to the project made by or
agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where
clearly no significant effects would occur; therefore, the Environmental Review Coordinator
has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration, IS-04-035.
IV. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program (IS-04-035) has been prepared in accordance with
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA
Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures ofthe City ofChula Vista, and hereby
adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program (IS-04-035).
V. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council does hereby find that in the exercise of their independent review and
judgment, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program (IS-04-035) in the form presented has been prepared in accordance with
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Environmental
Review Procedures of the City ofChula Vista and hereby adopts the same.
VI. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its
adoption
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Jim Sandoval
Planning and Building Director
Ann Moore
City Attorney
Ordinance No.
Page 4
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 4th day of October 2005, by the following vote:
AYES: Council members:
NAYS: Council members:
ABSENT: Council members:
ABSTAIN: Council members:
Stephen C. Padilla, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular
meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 4th day of October 2005.
Executed this 4th day of October 2005.
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
J :\PLANNING\HAROLD\REsOLUTIONS\PCZ-06-02CCORD.DOC
tn
...
o
.-
~
...
tn
.-
C
Cb
tn
:J
"
c:
CO
..J
c
o
$
u
..
~
~
~
C)
i
of g
... r
f j
1 t
H I
11 ~ ~
" .
c.g i
!!\1)
it ~l
n f~
iI If
I=i rz if
.,.J:Jo r/) U)
~
).'1:
d
H
af
L
:...
j'J.r
i~
AI
~J
~.~
Ii '~
~j I
:l1!-"
,,~~
.j;"'-
Hi
o c;-g - i
f ~~~ 0-
)"0 .a..! e-. i
-j =~H ;
j h HH i
-d. f.~~3 ~
-i .j; ~z!= ~~
i. !.~ j:,":~ ~
11 ~I UHf;
i i 5'5&~:'~
- -"c' f)ii.!2.__Eo-"1:
It j! l!]>" ii
; ,,{ UHh
f- h ~~H !i
f ~ ':; i. HH H
~ ~ i.~. II E ~ ~ 8 ,,~
~ ~ !.I.!! H h Cj; j
H ]'" ]'" Hfi t_~
~~ 1. ijE~ <3'3.
2
a:
~
::;)
::IE
u..
...
o
~
o
~5
~.IIIIIIII 2:
a:r" <.
-f,\,J/T..J.p:(
ffi . ~
(1.)0
~
=
,....
,....
.-
>
~~HII5~
~ill~ ~~
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING
CONDITIONS OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A
3.0-ACRE AND A 3.7-ACRE PARCEL ON EACH SIDE OF
THE TERMINUS OF EAST PALOMAR STREET
BETWEEN VIEW PARK WAY AND MAGDALENA
AVENUE INTO A TWO-LOT CONDOMINIUM
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR 158 RESIDENTIAL
UNITS - OTA Y RANCH, LP
WHEREAS, the property which is the subject matter of this resolution is identified as
Exhibit "A" attached to City Council Resolution No. and described on Chula Vista Tract
05-16, and is commonly known as Otay Ranch Village Six Mixed-Use Tentative Map,
("Property"); and,
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for the subdivision of the Property in the form of
a tentative subdivision map known as "Otay Ranch Village Six Mixed-Use Tentative Map, Chula
Vista Tract 05-16", ("Project"), was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building
Department on June 14,2005 by Otay Project L.P., ("Applicant"); and,
WHEREAS, the application requests the approval for the subdivision of a 3.0-acre and a
3.7-acre parcel ofland on each side ofthe terminus of East Palomar Street located between View
Park Way and Magdalena Avenue within Otay Ranch Village Six SPA into 158 condominium
lots; and
WHEREAS, The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the Project
and determined that the Project would require a Mitigated Negative Declaration to the Final
Environmental Impact Report for the Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and
Tentative Maps (Final EIR 98-01); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said "Otay
Ranch Village Six Mixed-Use Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05-16", (PCS-05-16) and notice
of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general
circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the Project site at least ten days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m.
on September 14, 2005, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Project and said
hearing was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was scheduled before the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista on proposed "Otay Ranch Village Six Mixed-Use Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract
05-16", (PCS-05-16) and,
Resolution No.
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows:
I. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their
public hearing held on September 14, 2005, and the minutes and resolutions resulting
therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. These documents,
along with any documents submitted to the decision makers, shall comprise the entire
record of the proceedings for any California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) claims.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has conducted an Initial
Study, IS-04-035 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Based
upon the results of the Initial Study, the Environmental Review Coordinator has
determined that the project could result in significant effects on the environment.
However, revisions to the project made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur;
therefore, the Environmental Review Coordinator has prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration, IS-04-035.
III. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (IS-04-035) has been prepared in
accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
State CEQA Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula
Vista, and hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program (IS-04-035).
IV. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council does hereby find that in the exercise of their independent review and
judgment, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program (IS-04-035) in the form presented has been prepared in accordance with
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the
Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and hereby adopts the
same.
V. ACTION
The City Council hereby approves the resolution approving the Otay Ranch Village Six
Mixed-Use Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05-16, (PCS-05-16) involving 6.7-acres of
land known as Otay Ranch Village Six Mixed-Use Tentative Map in this resolution,
Resolution No.
Page 3
finding it is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan, Village Six SPA Plan, and all other applicable Plans, and that the
public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good planning and zoning practice
support their approval and implementation.
VI. TENT A TIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City
Council finds that the Otay Ranch Village Six Mixed-Use Tentative Map, Chula Vista
Tract 05-16, (PCS-05-16) as conditioned herein for Applicant, is in conformance with all
the various elements of the City's General Plan, the Otay Ranch General Development
Plan and Village Six Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, based on the following:
1. Land Use
It is the City's goal to accommodate diversified housing types. The site is
designated for Medium-High density residential land use consistent with the
General Plan. Thus, the Project, as conditioned, is in substantial compliance with
the adopted General Plan.
2. Circulation
All on-site improvements exist or will be relocated and upgraded to serve the
subdivision. All off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision currently
exist. Street improvements will be provided to accommodate the mixed-use retail
and residential components as required.
3. Housing
The Project is consistent with the density prescribed within the General Plan and
will provide 158 attached condominium units for individual ownership. A
percentage of the 158-units will include affordable units that will create additional
opportunities for residential ownership.
4. Parks. Recreation and Open Space
In fulfillment of its obligation to provide parkland, the developer will provide
land via an irrevocable offer of dedication, payment of in-lieu fees, or a
combination thereof towards a Community Park within the service area of Village
Six. The developer will also provide development fees in accordance with CVMC
17.10. In addition, the Project includes on-site open space areas for passive and
active recreation, such as a tot-lot, and the project is adjacent to the private
pedestrian park and swimming pool that will be provided for condominium
resident use.
5. Conservation
The Village Six EIR (Final EIR 98-01) addressed the goals and policies of the
Conservation Element of the General Plan and found development of this site to
be consistent with these goals and policies.
6. Seismic Safety
Resolution No.
Page 4
The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the goals and policies of the
Seismic Element of the General Plan for this site. No seismic faults have been
identified in the vicinity of the Project according to the Village Six SPA Geo-
technical Reconnaissance Report.
7. Public Safety
The Fire Department and other emergency service agencies have reviewed the
proposed subdivision for conformance with City safety policies and have
determined that the proposal with some minor alterations to roadway access
surface treatments meets the City Threshold Standards for emergency services.
8. Public Facilities
The Applicant will provide all on-site and off-site streets, sewers and water
facilities necessary to serve this Project. The developer will also contribute to the
Otay Water District's improvement requirements to provide terminal water
storage for this Project as well as other major projects in the eastern territories.
9. Noise
The Project will include noise attenuation walls. In addition, all buildings are
required to meet the standards of the Uniform Building Code with regard to
acceptable interior noise levels.
10. Scenic Highway
The roadway design provides wide landscaped buffers along the surrounding
parkways of La Media Road, Birch Road, and Olympic Parkway. There is no
scenic highway adjacent to the Project.
11. Bicycle Routes
Bicyclists will share internal streets with motor vehicles due to the anticipated low
traffic volumes and limited speeds allowed on residential streets. Birch Road
includes a bike lane (class II) adjacent to the curb. La Media Road includes a
bike lane (class I) within the right-of-way on the road westerly side.
12. Public Buildings
Public buildings are not proposed on the Project site as part of the Community
Purpose Facility. A day care center is proposed at this location.
B. The configuration, orientation and topography of the site allow for a feasible setting for
passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities as required by Government Code
Section 66473.1.
c. The site is physically suited for residential development and the proposal conforms to all
standards established by the City for such project.
D. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein
contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extend to the impact created
by the proposed development.
Resolution No.
Page 5
VII. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A. Project Site Improvement
The Applicant, or their successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site described as
Otay Ranch Village Six Mixed-Use Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05-16, (PCS-05-
16) in conformance with all conditions of approval.
B. Design Consistency
Any improvements by the Applicant shall be in accordance with the Otay Ranch and City
of Chula Vista Design Guidelines and in accordance with a Design Review approval by
the Design Review Committee subsequent to the City Council approval.
VIII. CONDITIONS OF APPROV AL
The conditions herein imposed on the tentative map approval or other entitlement herein
contained is approximately proportional both to nature and extent of impact created by
the proposed development. Unless otherwise specified, all conditions and code
requirements listed below shall be fully completed to the City's satisfaction prior to
approval of the Final Map.
1. The Applicant shall obtain the appropriate permits for development of the project site,
and a Design Review permit shall be required for review and approval by the Design
Review Committee prior to the submittal of building permits to the Planning and
Building Department.
2. The Applicant shall implement, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and
Building and the Environmental Review Coordinator, all mitigation measures
identified in the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-04-035) and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program in accordance with the requirements, provisions
and schedules contained therein. Modification of the sequence of mitigation shall be
at the discretion of the Director of Planning and Building and Environmental Review
Coordinator should changes in circumstances warrant such a revision.
3. With regard to the Park Acquisition and Development (PAD) fees, the proposed 158-
units as attached multi-family units would generate $442,874 (158 x $2,803/mf unit)
in Park Development Fees and 1.24-ac (158 x 341.1/mfunit) in Parkland Dedication
Obligation, respectively. Outstanding land dedication will be due prior to first
building permit as an IOD towards Community Park acreage adjacent to areas
previously dedicated in future Otay Ranch Village Two. Fees/rates are subject to
change based on the fees in effect at the time of the first building permit issuance and
actual dwelling unit types as defined in the Parkland Dedication Ordinance.
4. The Tentative Map proposes widening East Palomar to 154-ft. and will require the
redesign of street tree and parkway landscaping. Provide a site plan illustrating the
proposed modifications to the Master Landscape Plan for review and approval by the
Department of General Services Landscape Architecture Section.
Resolution No.
Page 6
5. All existing developments adjacent to the project site shall be shown on the Tentative
Map, including the public park to the southwest, the CPF site improvements to the
northeast and all other surrounding multi-family projects. Show all driveways from
these projects that access View Park Way and Magdalena Ave along the sections of
these streets that are adjacent to the subject project. Show proposed access to the
subject project from these streets; show these to line up with opposing access to the
R-8 and R-9B projects. A drivable police access between MU-I and Santa Venetia
Park (Park P-l) was provided in the Park's design. Continuity with that drivable
access to either View Park Way or Magdalena Ave. needs to be shown on the
Tentative Map and constructed to the satisfaction of the Police Department.
6. The Tentative Map shows no additional lots on the MU-l and MU-2 parcels, and if
the applicant wishes to subdivide the existing lots and create lot lines for the proposed
0.7-acre Community Purpose Facility site, it must be shown on the Tentative Map.
7. Indicate on the Tentative Map the proposed locations of sewer connections for all
proposed internal lots including line and grade of proposed on-site public and private
sewer lines. Show how the site will be connected to public storm drains.
8. Show existing striping at the intersections of East Palomar Street with View Park
Way and Magdalena Ave.
9. Label the grading contour lines shown as existing per the approved Village 6 Rough
Grading Plan (CCV Drawing No. 02011) and subsequent construction changes (show
the existing de-silting basins, risers and connections to public storm drains). Show all
adjacent sewer, water, reclaimed water, storm drain facilities surrounding the project.
10. Show an enlargement of the section of East Palomar Street between View Park Way
and Magdalena Avenue. Show all details both within and outside the ROW including
proposed walkways, bicycle facilities and streetscape. To the extent these are known:
indicate building interface with adjacent pedestrian access.
11. The condominium note on the cover should refer only to the subject project on MU-I
and MU-2 and not all of the multi-family projects in Otay Ranch's Village Six.
12. Show the density of the subject project in the table on the last sheet of the Tentative
Map document.
Improvement Plans and Final Maps:
13. The Tentative Map indicates that East Palomar Street will be widened to provide
angled parking along the project frontage on the north side of East Palomar. The
cross-section of the proposed angled parking shall also be depicted on the Tentative
Map. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, street improvement
plans for this section of East Palomar Street shall be submitted for approval by the
City Engineer.
Resolution No.
Page 7
14. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project the Applicant shall secure
the installation and install a fully operating traffic signal at East Palomar Street and
View Park Way (the plans for this signal were submitted and approved as part of the
street improvement plans for East Palomar St.: CCV Drawing No. 02039).
15. Applicant shall submit a conceptual site-grading plan in conjunction with a Design
Review process. Grading plans and permits for MU-I and MU-2 will be required to
be in conformance with the Design Review Committee approved site plans.
16. No visible obstructions (slopes, trees, shrubs, walls, etc.) greater than 3.5 feet
measured from street grade, or lower than 6 feet above street grade, shall be placed
within sight distance lines at all corners. Sight distance lines, per City of Chula Vista
Municipal Code, will be required on all plan submittals (grading, improvement, and
final maps).
17. All proposed sidewalks and walkways, including those within or outside the public
Right-of-way, pedestrian ramps, and disabled parking shall be designed to meet ADA
standards.
18. The project will require the filing of final maps in accordance with Sections 66426
and 66427 of the Subdivision Map Act. The applicant shall enter into an agreement
prior to approval of the final map(s) to secure all public improvements required for
the development of the project.
Sewer Service:
19. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, the Applicant shall
satisfy the City Engineer that the Poggi Canyon Sewer Trunk has adequate capacity
to serve the project. This condition may be satisfied by the completion of the project,
now underway, to upgrade Reach 205 of Poggi Trunk Sewer.
20. Separate sewer improvement plans for MU-l and MU-2 will be required. The plans
shall show sewer mains designed to City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual
standards that shall be installed to serve as backbone systems within easements
granted to the City that are provided with a structural section designed to
accommodate minimum H-20 wheel loads using a traffic index equal to 5.
Storm Water Management:
21. Development of the project shall comply with all applicable regulations established
by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEP A) as set forth in the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements for
urban runoff and storm water discharge and any regulations adopted by the City of
Chula Vista pursuant to the NPDES regulations or requirements. Further, the
applicant shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control
Board to obtain coverage under the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water
Discharges Associated with Construction Activity and shall implement a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) concurrent with the commencement of grading
Resolution No.
Page 8
actIvItIes. The SWPPP shall include both construction and post-construction
pollution prevention and control measures and shall identify funding mechanisms for
post-construction and permanent control measures.
22. Development of the Mixed-Use project is subject to the requirements of Section
F.1.b. (2) of the NPDES Municipal Permit concerning Standard Urban Storm Water
Mitigation Plans (SUSMP), and Numeric Sizing Criteria. The applicant shall comply
with those requirements in accordance with the City of Chula Vista SUSMP.
23. A water quality study is required to identify potential storm water pollutants
generated at the project site during and after construction, and propose Best
Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce those pollutants to the maximum extent
practicable. The Applicant shall be required to complete the applicable Storm Water
Compliance Forms (5500 series forms) and comply with the City of Chula Vista's
Storm Water Management Standards Requirements Manual (Standards Manual) as
directed therein.
24. The Applicant will be required to implement BMPs to prevent pollution of storm
water conveyance systems located in the public right of way, both during and after
construction. Permanent storm water BMPs, including required site design, source
control and structural treatment measures shall be incorporated into the project
design, and shall be shown on an approved site improvement plan. Required
construction and non-structural BMP requirements that cannot be shown graphically,
and on-going maintenance and implementation of BMPs and source control
measures, shall be described in the project's SWPPP.
25. The Applicant, or an approved private entity, shall operate and maintain the project
site including the approved construction, post-construction and permanent BMPs in a
manner that minimizes the introduction of pollutants to the public streets and storm
drain systems to the maximum extent practicable. The applicant shall demonstrate to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer that the project site will be maintained in
accordance with the SWPPP.
26. The approved tentative map, street improvements, grading plans, final maps and site
improvement plans shall all be submitted in digital form in California State Plane
Coordinate System (NAD 83, Zone 6).
27. The Applicant is to be further advised that there may be additional requirements and
conditions applied during the ensuing entitlement process, depending upon
subsequent plans submitted for approval.
28. The approval of this Tentative Map shall not be effective unless the Otay Ranch GDP
Land Use Table Amendment, Village Six SPA Plan Site Utilization Plan Map
Amendment, and the Planned Community (PC) District Regulations Land Use
District Plan Map Zone Change are approved by the Chula Vista City Council.
Resolution No.
Page 9
IX. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, revoke or further condition issuance
of all future building permits issued under the authority of approvals herein granted,
institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek
damages for their violation.
X. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent
upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and
that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions, or conditions are determined by a
Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution
shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Jim Sandoval
Planning and Building Director
Ann Moore
City Attorney
Resolution No.
Page 10
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 4th day of October, 2005, by the following vote:
AYES: Council members:
NAYS: Council members:
ABSENT: Council members:
ABSTAIN: Council members:
Stephen C. Padilla, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a
regular meeting ofthe Chula Vista City Council held on the 4th day of October 2005.
Executed this 4th day of October 2005.
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
J :\PLANNING\HAROLD\REsOLUTIONS\PCS-05-16CCREso.DOC
~ ~
~ S2
~ ~
- "
~ '"
~ ~
i I
H~
I I
"
~
c
~
~
"
!(I
~
~
~2~~~~G~~~"'"
~8~~~-J~~~~
r"'" <- ~'~ Y.I ~ ~ ..."
~~,;:~~~ ~
~v) 6 ~~gi5:
"""1:.~~ o~'-'
~~ 8~~
~ ~ g
g ~ ~ ~
8
~
>:
g
Q 0...... ~......
"E
~~(f)8~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
S3 ~~ ,C:~
;;: -
~ 6 ~
~ 2: ~
~
~
~-,.'
(!!
() ....'
; :Q
~
? ~
:tJ
~
~ ~
t:J
? ~
o
~
~
:::!
:::!
~
fq ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ "
P2 ~
~ ~
~ ~
<: "
'"
-r> ~ ~
~ I
II ~-I
AI
~
i'1
"
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
1 ~ 1
;;:
"
111n
I
~~~~~~~
C:~C/)~~nt~
~f"rJ~~!::::tI:tJ
~:-to~o
~:<(~f'>1~
" '" <:
'" <)
'iI
i'i
."
~
,....
o
C::
:::!
,....
-
:::!
~
to~:-'"
~~~
,"'......~
~~~
~~~
I\:;~-I
,."'~
~f~
~~~
~8~
'ti'1
,."
~~
~'i'
8J~
~.-<
c
.,'"
",c
~~
_'"
~;g
~"
:!;~
"0<
~~
'Ii'"
,,~
CIa
0<
C)"
~~g~;~;
aQR-;;'"'<-.:::-':::
~~~r:;~~~
~: ~~6~
),.r-- r--\jr--
::-I )>.),.b
s.u ~
~~ ~~~
&5 ~~~
"
"
c;
'iI
~
~~~
,,~
"'''
<)"
'fj~
~~
g"
2'i'
"'"
~~
,.~
~i
'i''''
S3~
~~
~~
,,~
"0
.,,.
<:.,
""
~"
"'~
"''''
"0'"
~"
"",
~i'1
~~
~~
~;a
"'\!'
~&>
8~~
?2~
~~~
~~~
o~~
~-u2:
. ~~
"
",.
"'"0
,,'"
R~
'"
,."
~~
:~
"''''
",'"
,,~
8~
Ci:!;
~~
~z
9~
'"
g
R~~
,.",,.
~~t1
~~a_
"'~C;
g~~
,.,."
VI::<!::~
'oM'"
r:'~:b
'" '"
<::ZD
!=):--t~
~~~
?~~ ~
~~~
~~~
!=)';~
" ,.
s~
"'c
;!f:!
~~
,,<:
""
,.,
. ~
~ :xl
~i~ m
~
~h )>
)> :xl
H~ m
0 <0 s: :0:I: c
~ m if I 7 ;:..C III
Z f" ~(f)Z ~
0 ~~ _ (f) (f)
-~ C nO;:"
- ii-I PO?;
0 r-< m t -:;tI1
J C ~...;:;o
c:
iii >:IJ -i . tI1
(f)
< m
iii" e>)> Z z
pi ~ 9
0 mZ i :II
m
~ mC') < <
. ~ en
, 0' m
. 0
j 3 ::r: s: z
.. OJ" )> (J)
'1J
,
t ~
a C to '
f ~ ,. C)
(J) a ~ OJ "!
~ 0 ~ :I: 2, m
ij "TI m '"
~ ~ '" III
. . ~ -<
~
~
~~
OJ u,
~
CI)
~
~
....
~
~
CI)
c:
~
::::j
~~d~~ ~
~G)~(,"":)::U b
~~~~S ~
t~:tJ~L., 0)
8r;j~M~ ~
?o::r.:'at::l :;
s:~~~: ~
O)~~t:~ b"
~~6d5 ~
I <:<:~:2: 1)
8-~o~() <:
0_"" ." P
;~~~~ -
" ~~~~
~~p:!~p
tt:jo)CJ..f>,.
~~~~~
I_~f;fi!
:::."a:tJ~:::tJ
~~S~S
,."
Y'o~_'-J:!::
~~~~~
y~~~~
o6Q;~~
~~~~
~~Q~
a ,.
~~~8
YJ ~c::
"0<:
00"
c""
~~~
~ ~
~
<:
~ ~~ ~
?:: 8~ ::to.
\:Y) ~~ ~
~ d~ 01
~ ~~ ~
~ ~O\
~ ~~ ~.
t:--J~ ~
9 ~~ ~
?:2...... 9
.:; ~~
t ~~
, QIO
" ,.-
? ~~
}? 8~
i!j<)
'" ",0
,. . c
" <:
6 ~
'"
"
~
~
~
~
~
9
-
'-
'"
"
'"
1
is
a
6
,.
'"
"
c.
1
~
"
I
is
t:J
IT!
~
I'""'
o
~
~
Q
~
~
t~~~~~
"''''
~~~~~~
~~Ui r-~
~~~~8?ti
t::I~;dgi
~l/}rr,~~r:;
A=i~~;~~
~~~~~~
~~~~E~
d""'<CJOfTilFj
~~~~~8
<:~;;I~~t;
g:::tJ~gc:~
~:t<:3::d~
:r~~~~~
~3?3::b-U
~Qlf1JC::b:::tJ
UJQ~~~2
C~6~='1~
~[jg~~01
~;;;lt")F:t:Jc;
6~~;~0
:~~~~~
~~~~;8
~~S(j~
gciJC:J~1:q
~~~~g
-I.!.~t:?~
~P~~l.::
~~Y!~~
::::!(:: 60
MC:: =<::""'1
1
~
~~~~~
';:~.~~~
~G)}>.C)~
l.-C)~~ii;
~Q~~~
\Or;:~'1:J
~_--IM
" "
-v,
c"O
~~
~~
"",
:!;
"0
~.,.c
\-
\
\
\
\
l
'I
\
\
CI)
~
I'Tj
-!
Co)
......
IT!
~
,....
t:J
~
~
::!
o
~
'"
"
,....
,:)
:1
~
~
o
~
CI)
='" ~
~~~3~~S~~g8
Q<:='1r;:r:~~~;;::~B;
B~~-':::~~~n"J.:tJ~::i
[j~r--~;:~6Q~3::;;
~1""1~~)';-I<:~~~~
dO-u~~~~~::::-t<:
~~o:-t~~~~~~~
~~8:i~~~~'~:~
~:(~:~~~. ~~~
~2-.:::C)o~6 ~C)~
r--~~2~Via 00
~~~~Ri8~ ~~~
~~fSo~~g ~g~
o~~~<-:t?5 ~;ij~
~~~~(;)~~ ~ti6
~~~~}.F'l~ !'1~~~8
~~g~~~Vi ~~(j)~~~
?j~~~~r-~ '-~lS~2~
~~c:rTL-..~_ ~?5-">.::j~
:t~~~~3:~ ~~~~~~
-utt)3I~~' ~ ~f"']~f"']-<~
~6~@~ 8 ~~~~~05'
~~),. ~~Cj~"""a
'" ~~o (j ~~-I :to
~1I~~ ~ ~~~ ~~
~~~5: ~ ~t;;'2 ~~
~~"1Cj ~ ):.~),: bVJ
r;t"'(;jz q -Ih{o:t ~$
~ ~g 2 ~Y1~ ~~
~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~Q
~ tr~ ~ ~~~ ~p ~
~ ~~ ~- ~~ ~
~ ~ Cj~ ~
'" OJ
'"
'i'
'"
6 OVl ~~
~ ~~ ~~
~ ~ I ~~
~ ~~ ~i7)
~ g~ ~~
z ,,,..... VIr.,
~ 18 Iii
~~~vt~~~
~o~~-~~~
o!~:t~~~
v( ~~~~~
~iJ~'Ii'i'
VJ::r:fq::r:n,
2~td~o
~8~~~
r-- r-~(;)
~~~~~
~ro ~~
8~ :t~
~8 ~~
~t :-,"V)
:t~ ~;
~5 Vj~
2~ ~~
R~ r>"1<:
~~
<:
i;I
o
'0
~
<:
to
[']
50
'"
"
i'1
'ii
~
"i
o
"
<:
J'
l'
Vi
<:
,.
"
C)
o
~
o
~
~
~
~
o
~
'" I\:) '" 1\:)1\:)
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~
~~~\j~~~~~:tU)u)C)~DaCj-uCj:tJ ~ )>. C) .
~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~5:~~~~~8~~~~~5~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~g~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~
>~ ~c~~~~~~~c/)."1-1~~~r-~~~~-':::r--<:~a . ~~~ '~-I"1~-<~~ ()~tt)
8~~~~~~:t~~o~65~8~-<~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~:tJ~~~-.:::~~~~~g~r-~
~Q~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~a~~~),.d~~Cj~~~~~~ ~~~
1'~~~~ ~~8~~~~~~~~~:~;ti!j6~~~~~~~~~~~'ii~~;~~~~~~~6
~~:tJ2: c::._c::"l:I2:rr, _r--_ ::z:SJ!tft<: <:IJ;) CJ() }..o:t}..<:sc::-t!,(l:tl of"11}..<: CJ
~~~d~ ~s~~~~~~~~~~~g2~9~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~
~f"11 C::tI ~_~-'r-- ~CJ ~o ~~<:~ ()c:f"11~a ~ ~ c:o~ ~o ::r:~-
~~~~~ ~~8~:tIoi7) ~~~~~~~~. ~~~~~2:~~~~~~8~~~~~~'~~~~
b~~t~ ac~c::- ~~~()~ ~ ......~~ ~ ~~~9~-':::~~~~~~~~~O~&~~:~
~~a~~ ~~~~~d~-<~~g~ ~~~ 8 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ oc~~~~~<:~
() MCJ ~ ~-"S:tl~~~~:tIffi ~r--~ _ )>.6~~CJ<:g~-ICJ()~ ~~~~o~C)CJCJ
f2~Cj~ -u~r>"1~<:~! ~~~e 2:~~ <: ~:tI~~~2o~~' ~lI ::r:~~::r:oi~~~
~~2~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ g 'i'~~"~~~~:~~~ i:~~~~~~~
~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ;~~~~~~;~~~~ ~~~~:~~~~
~~~~~ ~ f"1188~VJ~oi~~ ~2~ <: ~~~Q~o;~~~. 8 ~~~~~~~~~
~~~g~ ~ 22~%~6~~~~ ~~6 ~ =~~~~~'i'g~6 ~ ~~~~~~~~~
~~:tJ~~ Q ~~~~o~~~~~ Q~~ ~ ~o~~~<:f"11f"11~~ <: ~ Q~<::ba~
~~0~~ ~ ~~slJ;)~;~~~~~8 ~~~ 8~~~;~8~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~
.,<: ......tt) ~ u, ~~ f"11 ~~ ~ <:~or--:tJ~-.:::~r--o ~ - -:tJ -~, ~
g; ~~ ~ 'ii~~Q~~~2~~ ~~~ <) ~~~~~~'ii~~5 l' ~~~~8]~~'"
~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~C) :tIR~ ~ ~6~~~~Od~8 ~ ~~~~~o~~~
a~ ~Q ~~ ~~ ~a ~a2 a ~~)>.~~~~~~b c ~. oa~~~~<:
~~ 8~ d p~~ ~8 ~c8 ~~~ ~ ~~g ~6~~~~ ~ ~ ~to~~dc~
~tt) ~s 6 :~2 ~~ ~~~ g~~ 2 ~~~ 9~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~
~~ tt)~ ~ ~~ ~~ to ~ :-'"~$ ~ ~~~ -2~0Cj~ ~ C ~~ ~~~VI
~ ~h 5 ~~ ~o -.::: () . ~ _ ~~Z ~c~ VI~ z ~ tt)~~Qr:'~a
IJ;) ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ U). ~h S ~~g ~~r--~~~ ~ ~ ~Q~~~c~
"1 x~ ~ ~~d ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~9~ ~~b~~~ w ~ tt)~~~ c~
~G ~ g ~ ~ ~~ ~ Vlm~ ~~~~~. ~ ~ ~-':::"1~tVi~
~:tJ 0 ~ ~ h ~~ OO~ c~o~ ~ ~~~~~~o
~ ~ ~ 6~ ~b ~~~e ~ . ~~~~~0~
~r-- ~ ~~~~ . ~~~~~-<
F'l ~ ~ ~VI ~~~~
o ~ .20
~ ~
"1J-U J'-..jn, ~"'"1
~~~~ ~~
~~ ~ ~ ~......
g; ~ ~ ~~
:;;:1;?:s~ ~~tt)to
:z:0 ~~ t~oI~~
CJc: <: (I) Go:tlo
~~0~~~~~
\)~~V)~69~~
~!!2()~~----~0
~<:b :tJ O'>OIQ) .
~~~ 1:- t~~--
~;;~ ~~~ *
-o~~ <: 1 I
~~~ g.~.:; ~
QR{S5 !,,10')~ 2:
~~ti ~t~ ~
Q~ ~~~ ~
~~ ~.~.~ I
~; ~~~ ~
<: I ~ ~~ ~
~~ ~~~ ~
R~ 5~~ ~
~~ ~ ~ ~
~~ 8 ~ If
~~ c 0 ~
at:'- ~?
28 ~ ~
0<:
0"
~'"
"
<)
~
o
-I
Q~~
:;!-nm
O",A.IZ
~)>C
J:Zm
c: C
>~-I
=::;\./m
cn---r-Z
~""'-I
~<~
r -
:;; <
orm
~rs:
>J>)>
G)"tJ
m
m
C/)~
-:tJ
~o
~
....
~O')\JI
Ci)
,. I'T1
~
~
,....
~
~
CI)
"c.
"
z..~
~~~
~~8~~iLg6~~~!Q
;~~~6~~~~~~:
~&i~ p.~f>1~~~~~
c~~ )>.lI'!~b"'r"rJ..
~."l:I ~~~~GP-
(=) ~ a~s:':0a~
~ ~ YlC;~0 r;::
~ ~ G~~ ~~
~ ~ ~~ --q~
C. D ~b-),..
~ ~ ~r- ~'2
,,-
"c..
~ -------
"''''~---~ I ~~g:~~
~(.-l~~
~~
"
"
o
.<;
()
'"
,.
<.
I
~
'"
1
c;
'"
c.
~
'"
o
'"
'"
"0
o
~
<5
~
~ ~1"
-----+
13 I ;ii: "1J g{
~ :b0 8
c: C):n"
en ~~ s;
~ mo ~
'" ....~~
~O~
:b"~
:to~~
~~~
<:~:;j
c:)=,;~
",~
:to<:
-I",
:to
:n;:!
~:b
~CI)
s:;::;ti
....m
~-I
iT1~
~~
",
C)
:::!
o
~
~.I\b ,'. '
i ~j~
! (-/71 i
Ili~~
~ III ~~~ ~
~~~
l J :~\:
-1~~ ,
t.1\ ".
" ~~
"'~
""
en",
",,,
~ ~~
';'YE" ;:' :;
x~::tJ6
/I~ : ["
~~ r\'1--'~~ ~ i I
~~ '\ ~~-';
~.~. Ii "'i')" ~
\~ C!~~~ ~-
\ .. ~"'i')"
13 9:! ~
~ :n 1ii
'" Q;:
';; .... t
~:C~ ~
~ E
I
I
I
'I!,:J---t
';:3;!
1i ~~ i;31
I P .
1,,:- ';:'iJ
II.~ :<:::t.;:;
~C! l"l~ .
II ~~ ,~ 't 1
II ~ ~~G I I
I 'J-1 ~;I~
I, / ~'"
I' _
\ ~":-
'-~"~
~
/:"~
~" +, $',.
~::tJ '+
~.~
"
ij
~
d~
~ ~ ~
d~
I."
a ~ ~
~ " :r
f~1
~"f
~~f
~
~
~
II;
o
[D
~
~'" ~
~?, 0
~ c: t:J
j;
~
C)
~
6
tr1
~
C)
: !2' ::r:
.)>c
~~~
- >
~R~
;:;~
c;;:j
(f)
)>
0 :s::
() m
~ <-I z '" ~Co
g, 0 8 ~ '0
r=~ m ~i ~6 ~
() 0 en C)" ~
"3 ~ ):;~ F
c: >JJ -i
Dr m "'.... ~
< Z ~
iii' G))> ~ ~
- }.>. en
~ j=::: '"
mZ -i '"
() 8 '"
< "
!!!. 0)("") ?;
~
. s: m ~ '"
, :J: :s:: ~ ~
. .... "
., :::::I )> ~
.. iii' C)
'1J I:::! ~
I ~ i;;
j
~ (F)
i
t I
~ 0 I\) m
! " m
I -I
.
.
'"
"
~
"
~
'0
I"
i~
o.
'"
~~ "
." "'. .
~ "
"
8 ~m
o ~~
Q ~~
r;; 5: ~
~~
",~
;:!E;
:b~
CI):;j
~R1
::x:;....
m
-I
~
~
1i ~ ~
1 \ II \~ : ~.
~ \ I' -::;8 ~ G.
M .1 ~aJ
~ "
~'" lil~;I" --~ L.
::, I ~ / ):: N,
d / ~
Ir......~J! ..~
I "'.1
\ 1:-1,0111 '"
.. , "
;: ~~ -tl. ~
~ ~t
~ % ~~
,., a'" " ~ ~
~- ~~ ~~
~~ ~~
~,
~
~
';'\c'~t
7X( .
'e.",
I . ~~
/If~. ;!>!
I I ~
~~ I~JI ~~ "'.
~~ I r:,"-
: \ ~~IIG
,.,'" O~ ~ 1 \ '"i')
S8~ r- <: r- \ 0,
~~ ~H" I" 2 ~L ~
~~~~ I~ail"l~~
~'" C)s; (I I ~<;;'iJ
~ ~~ ~ \1 ! ~~G
;: ~~ ~ \Jl/
! ;1 ! wl~;
I~ /11" ';:'iJ
I" ~~;;.
! rI ~: 0,
III ~ ~~_
I III ~ ~"
I I ~'"
/1/ ~~tD
is ,"
\~
~~~
..~ 1;; "\\\
-- ~.Of I~
~~ - \
'50 UAXcJ:~ ~
~~ v'>'f.<
~ 0
'lOR -j:)
_I ~ 25 ;/
-~~
~en
c;j~
"",
~"
"'0
0~ ~
~9 ~&i
(T)~ rl-l
" -"
Q~
~~
~
~ 3:: C/L
:0
a ~ PIL
Q5;
~ii1
tJ
~
ITJ
I\)
~
c:
~
....
",
~
~i:
~2
I"l~
"'''' ;ii: '"
~~ ~ m
~Cj C')~
?i t)::i
~)).~
'" .... '"
!:!;! ~ ~
<. ~ l:J
~ ~ ~
:to tJ ~
5: ~ ~
rri~~
'" a
.... ~
i\i
'^
<3
'"
f
"
I~
~
1;
'^
Q
:Ii
'"
'^
".
~
~
".
'"
'"
0;
g~ :S~
g; -oj I'T1 92
~~ ~ ~
Q "90. i!
:;; ~..
:n:Jj i;
,,~ ;?
;E ~ ~
~ ~ ~
-<: Co ~
~ ~
~ ~
"
"
~"
~c
~ii!
I~to ~i 0;
II ^'
I /) ~.
il:-. !"
;!~l,
l:.,"-> \.~;.. ~
Q
:Ii
'"
en
"
~.
'" r- '1>
': 1:- <;;
c: ~1ii
en .....:Jj
~ ~ ~
'" ..... '"
S:;:s;
:c~
0,;;
:be:
~~
Ii
x
~
'"
Co
:;j
~
c.
~:~ l",.II"''''''
~;= '~en~~
rl~ .!~:!)~
/Ui~.. "" r ~~
'" I~" G I
! :{ IE"
\\111"
\11..
~~lll ~ ~L
~ ) r'1~N
~
~ ~ ICb_ I _
~ "'- ~
J ~ ",:
: ! ~ - \;,
II! -- <;; ~
ti ~;:"
i~ ~Cb.
j !~co ~ G L
i' 1\;,-; i'i!i'!
~ ,,~
~"
t~1 '~~
': ~
D ~
~~
'" ....
t:J
~
;:
:b
C)
",
CI)
~
....
",
t:J
",
~
j=:::
pIL
~""[>~c
.....<")r--:.o
~ww~ ~
~.~~~i2
"'~
;;:
:0
'>
0;
II ~"
I -co
III' Ii
/1/
:~
\~
k3~
~ - ~
" ~
-. . ~'1
l~,,"~;.. ~
Q
:Ii
:;:
"
~.
'"
\113 ~!!1~
VI-i .jia~<::
j;!c::cCl)sr,
"'", ,,-I....
\! _s
:;; ~~!;;
:to r- ii1
-<:o~
~;ii::;j
C:b -<
;ii::n ~
:b CI) ~
C):;ti
~1'11
....",
trr-l
~~
:toO
5:~
~s
C:",
",~
;;
"
'"
Ii
~
~~
:.:.~
~~
"",
'-..-~
'0
"'
"
co
5
"
"
81~
::; -
Q~
:;; ....
~
~
~
~
C)
~
....
....
CI)
~
:::!
o
i~
c.
~
~
E:.
81 ~ s~
o! ....0 ~~
IJ)I ....:;;;:: Jj
~I ~ ~I
:n :n tJ
':to"'"
e5~
-<:
~~
C)~
~~
....:t
"'0
~"
~
:toCl)
~-I
<:
ffl
;?
i
,.
1;
~
"
T~
, '"
" o ~
c;; en '"
" -<
~ ~ ~
I 0;. 0
I~ ~
F:
~- ~ Co
" :;j
~~ ~
"
I.~ ~ i;; il
-~'_ I,I[
'. ~ I
,~~~t
~~ \ ~ I~
z~ i,,&
l<~ t(:- C~
g~ ~-
~~ ~~
~" '^~
~~
~,,~
""'5I'+Y"
1'~"
\~ 0,
;;, ....~. Y' !O). .
~ ~
'" I
~ I ~~
~ 'I~ ~~!::::
::!.:' I ~ ~f"1. .
)>. I C)Q
~ ,
---'00-
8
"
'"
~"
~g
,,~
~~
~
~SQ~ 0f
~~IQJ.
~
I "1)1>.1
~ ~ N ~pi::::
'; I ~ 2:tJ: .
"'\ "
-::;ji I :
h '1~" t
.c:F1I~
'"
"':to-l
':~::<:
DtJ~
~~~
"'~....
1'Ti....
~o
I.... -I
. t:J
i.... ;::0
O}.>.
~;:
:::!~
0",
~
~
~
! ;:=
~'=.
~::.
"
en
~so-
~-1'V1.
';:'i1
"',.-
r,,~~
-/1 SI"'i==.,
- '"
I ",_- /
"'-. /
Itl
,;;;
~iii
~~
"
~
13 0!!1~
~ .... -"
o ::<: CI) ~
eo ~ -I;
~ 3!~~
C).... ii1
:b o~
~~~
~:n Co
~CI)~
-<::;ti
dm
-I
$J1
"'::x:;
~O
~~
~
~
-<:
~
~
"
~
"iC
"eo
~~
STREET
'"
"
~i\\~ ~ ~
i; I \ -::;2
~ ! i ~:
'" III "
;I~'
J-j
./ ~"~~" I
~ ~~ \ I"
~ l~
~ <::>'" ""'~ ....+\'" ~'-"
''101<1 ",_
Ci ~~ ~~
'C. 16...... ""-:
-i ~~
"
<j:to-l S
8 -t ~ V;
~O"'ti
~"1J~
:;,~....
Cl)d
~"1J
C)O
"'''
, OJ CI)
0....
c:0
~"1J
~~
:n~
-<:C)
:r:
--------1
,.""
2:0::0
tJ<:;;:
Vln-]
1-- ] g~~
J \--7' ~ c. ~ .;;;c;;,j,
r C< ~ I ~ - ::Q ::: C)Vi
I~ --l/ ~ ~~ ~~
/ 1 _[I ~ ~8
/ I:j-. "'. ~1'. I . ~~
~ ~(J_, "'~
,,~
-.- <'/)J::
'-----~
/ '%MiN I" ) "0<
~ I~~
Ii TO[ 0' SLOPE ~'.~
1 ;\, '0':_0, SLOP[ _\... .
.. PROPERTY LINE
" ~
~
~
<, ~
I~
~:s
~z
\"
s?~~
~'Y'IQ
1iV\ IS'
~~
~;;.~
?
~ ~
,. ~
;./J
I
~
z
o. II
-Hi
> , I
:>
s:
() 0 m 1J I.
~ Z ,
=S~ ~ )> "
I"
9- :n ,
I
() r -< c -t I I
~ , /
c: s;: JJ ~
iii" " .*
<
~ G))> ~ ~
JU mz -I
() 0) (") ril
~ /
a: ......
i :J: s: I\)
j ... -
:J :>
.. ii" "'C ; '\/
I
!
i rJJ
r I .1
~ 0 UJ m I,
m
" -I
i
.
>
t;/q>/
,> ,..,.
, '
,.
<
. I
I
i
,
"
I
I
~h.
h~
H ~ : ~2
iff :G;z
~Qf ~C')~
~~. po~
Iii J ;)>;;t
~ r;~
~ en
<J
J:]
m
<J
}0-
J:]
m
o
OJ
:<:
._~
\
\
\
\ .
"\
(
I
T
1 I II ! I I . II I 1 I I 5
'IT ""'1'"':'1'1'''''1''' 1""lr,,'mlm,,, "" " 'T" "'lr "'. '1"'''r'''.I"'', 'T; I, ..-- .1.1 i I
eg E~dlj.~.~ ,,:.~.~ ~ ~:.~;;; ~~11~1.~1~;: aT; ~~I!~I';:.~ i ~~I~!I": .~,.~ ~ .~~II~ ~~;;: ~~ i>);); j;); );@~I;;;.~.~.~ ~~,E E;:;;;; ~ ~;; ~..;:~; ~;; .~I);. ;;~I'~I~~I.....:;; .~..~1;;1.~~1~11~ ~;; @I.:;!I~:;::; ~ 8~
~!S! 1d ~.". B i$ - ~.... (zj 15 0;.... ~I;t,;..... RJ ~ <:>> 0.... -..I1e:J:..... (I! v.> (j.::;j $ ~iS....:::j ~..............1:S..... ~ <:;; <:h 0; <:h <:h ~ __;:j 0..... m ~ cs: ~ ~i~ ~ <3 <t>:g C! OJ Q,1li __... _ ~./>o!!! ~ <IS U; IS ~iUi!;,~ (i, &;I;:j i!i 1:ii ~ <1! _If) .....!cJ> _ X 10 .
, · ' . , II. ' I ! ~ e
'T ! I iii' il : I il!.I! ' '. ~I ." ~
!J'... ~ 01 ~IJIJ'_<.ro <J'I 0> <.ro '-" <II........ <..n .".~I\.!I!I,.:_.j>.,'" ...... .".!,""',. ....!... "'_......".1.... \J1 uo 511 <.1'_'" (11."".1./1..... "'.<,1' \II (/1_(11 <11 "'......,<J1 <.ro U1~UI '" yo ",_". ......:.....:.,....... U1_C1>_/;!>''''' _. <J' "'_ID a>,,, P':,U'I!IJ' <Jt <.11.'" ,,,,.trI'IIJ'_'" _<J1.... ...,....:...!-jli:~ <J> _..... '-" "':<JI!'JI ,<J' i!; ~
' '" '" , "" '" W"'~.'..~~'w.~.~..";".~"'..R"I:;j,,,,~.~,~,,..~,,~.I~;,.~_,,,_.~.~~~.._..,.~i;;.;".~I'~.""i?~)::OO~!OO"':'w~'."~.'~'"I.!...$~.~I:~~'2~~~OO'-.~~.'121~- ..
~ w a! "-I i:i 8S... ~ ~". - 1;:S 't ~ ~ ~ 15;S;.."g:... ~ 1:!'; -...j '" ~,~ ~...... a;,-...I!j3 '" l <.I'!i". ~ w '::: --J '" 'f _,-..I.............!fj 8 <111 X "::5: 0; ",... ~ "",&5: w ~ ti: ~ ~ X ~ ...:t t:i <:K:i!:i <:5 _,i!5i!i (J) ,,":J;.::5 ~,.....,~~R! 15... b'>!:II ~ ~...... 1$ P
- , I I I I I 'I i ' !! ~
!II O<<ch "0"+'-
J8 p ~~~ ~ ~ ~:I~~ ;j ~~ ~ ~;; &
~i!i ~~~~~. ~-~.~ ~"~~
~ ;1; z ~ n ~ - I Q ~ m 0 + > ~i~ ~ iii'ij!~ 8 S' 8 ~i~ ~ u ~ ~ ~18 ~ l~il ~r'~ ~ ~ 81~~1~ ~ ~ 1,'",'! n ~ $I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ RJl!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~.t.l~ ~,~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I:'~ ~ ~. ,1;;;1'. J 1'1,1. _I '0 ~. w ~ fIfi
~ ~I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I " P i5
> 00 I ,It; ):0 (/), I' :r
(').." 1"1'1("')" I i OJ
, I I i I I II I coO
g ~ ~ ~ US g ~ii ~ ~ ~ ~~ il'~ ~ ~,~; ~ ~I~ ~~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~8 ~ ~ ~ i~I~lfi'~!~I~.~.~.~ ~I~I~~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~It:: i i~l~ i i i i i ~Ii.~ ~ ~ i ~ 91~ i.~ Ii ~ ~~~I~ i ~.~ ~ ~~!~ ~ ~.~ S ~1;1~li ~ ~ ~8 ~'~I~ ~ ~ililiriii i H,i @Ii:.'~ ~ .~il~I~I~~ ~ ~
I i I I! I I" I I I II" e
I .1'" ~". il"'" (,11 U'I'" <II .....'.....;". a> OJ.'JI.... '" W W to> wi"'I,....I~I:.~~jj'''''i.l>"..... ....,,,.Iwj.....,," U'I '" "':.l> ".I...'j>.". Co> ~I-", w w w w w ".I;f>. Po".......". <.11!",..... CD 0> 0>". ....,...:<.1'". U'I::O...... ",1"'1"""'''' _eJo '" -.....I.....:r.."....". ...:,.. U'I U'I 1>01....,_....,1....1".". ."..'....:1_.... .....-"........ '" .fJO..fJO ....i,.J.... ~ I:;!
, '" "'" ""', " ~ ~ .~'..~ ';;.~ i><.~;" ~I.~., i::' ~ ~,,",oo ..i.~I~" "'~.~.- ','i>> ;.,...;.~ "'i><)::'";,..~I~" ".oooo.oo ..oo..~ t is .~" i>< ~ ;,i... i><~ ~ ~ \;:'i;.' .~~o.- \111"''' I::'~ ~ "'.;;: ~ is t ~;" i: )!,." i? & .~",I~'.~!'.N.' ~II.;'~'N ",.. I:: ~ ~ R 1:::"..'18: ~
. ~ 8 .~ ~ "~, ~ . ~ ~ w " '1$ $ $,$, . ~;~ . ~ ":~' $1 ~I~ , ~ ~I. ~ "I. ~ , $,$ $ $ ~ $ $ . ~ ~ " . ~ , ." · ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I"~ ~ & ~ ~ " $ . , $ . ~ ~.w,. ~ , ~ g 'I~ " ~ wiw~ . ~i~ ~ ~~: '18,~ ~ w ~ " · ~ ~,~! ~
~ ~I~ J ~ ~ ~ I I i I I i J I ! Ii 'II I I I
!I ~1~nc-I'IQ"monw> Ui"H~€iii~~8S.8~+I~I~~~~~~ I~I~~~~I~~~~~~I"I: ".",_~m~~~~~~I~~~$~~$~,~~IRJe ~,~&I~,t~ 1,~~~i~!~~~~~~~I'~~~~~I~i: ~~~~w,ool~.I~I~::6< -~~ !:~~ m
I G T1 ~ t; ~ I i I: :I:
,,1'1$ ~';;; ~; ~!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~I~!~ j: ~ ~; ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ;'; ~ ~ ~ ~; ;'; ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j: j: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;; ~ ~ w. ~ w: ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~'I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1;lrn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Wil;; ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~I~I$I~ ~ ~ ~ ~;; ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ;
'I ~ "~W ~ " . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g: ~ , ~ 0 . ~ ~ ~ ~1.~lw ~ ~ ~ ~ - , ilk . ~ . , ~ , . ~ . . ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 p ~ ffi ~ , ~ . ~ p , $ ~I ~ ~ 8 w . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ . 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , ~ g g " " ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ , " H~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " . ~ ~ ~ C 0
I i I I i I i I ~ g
,. .1......" wllw w w wwI w W" ww'w "IW" w .w'."....... w w" "w.w W w."" ww" w". 1 . .'. "UWII.w ~I;~I~' . w w W"'I"" w...".. W w J.!I'" '" w JJL" ww! "." ~ ~
,; '" ,I ' , " ~ ~~~~~a@~tJ~H~1;~~~I~~g~g!liI~~~~HI~~~!!.~~.~..~~.~~~,,!!:~t.~~~~~..~1!~@@~i!~1~8.~I"~~.lg~i{f'J@~~.~~:I~~~.~.~~~~~.~~~~ii~i~,.ii~~~~.~~:I~~~'~I,~'iil@~~~I~;~I~
. I . I I . i I .!: I: I. . I I::
I - _,_1- _ _ _ _11_i_~ ~ _ _ I : al~1 II' TI 1,m I ~i" I I '" II I. ~I~ I 5 Z
I""'""" 'I'(m' ",'I"'"'' '" "'''I'''''' I ""'1'1"'" ":'1"'1''''''' r "'. T" "'..... ",,,,,I, ""1',', .,,"'! ,"" "I' , ........ i I
I~. 1'1""' ,wl~lll"."'."""."'."" "'I" w W" ""~I~ '"' "I"IJ'I""" '." ,I".".w W" w ,w1w.w w. W'"""." "'I"'.w" w WII.I'I)", .' ","IJJ1"I" ",I, w }.Iw,.,"" ~I"".'." ,.~. ~ ~
i~ .~ ~~ J: J: J: J: J: i'J:J: ~ ~i~l~ ~~ g ~ g ~ ~.~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ U ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ilg ~!~~glg~~IH ii~ ~lH ~!~ ~~ ~ ~ a & ~~ g ~ ~ ~ g ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~'~I~ ~,~:g ~~~i~~,~,~ U ~ ~ ~.~ ~!i ~ ~ ~~Igi~ ihiiii~U~~U~ g
rJ .'.' , " '.'1"" " WI"I'I"."' M " , 'I" "." " ",I".w w ".'.'.' '.'''." "' "",,I".I"~" JI'[" Ni"" " , ".w, ."iw W.".' w N "."'.'." ,,"I" , w . .www.:.U.I"...J"IIJ~~.....M"~I.w...M.11 'N' " ""' '" ~ ~
to <0 '" W <%I --.J...,,""........... --.J.... 0> :;;:1:..... -.......'....................... '" '" IP '" <D '" ;;:1.-" '" --.I -...:................. -..J.....,.... ....,;;:1-:.., VI (J" <J1 '" U> "',t.n '-"... '" "'!XI' .... '"'.... '" "'......... -.J __.... ....,........ _.... '" '-" ._ 00:_1..... -.......... -.. '-" ",' to.' "'" '........ ....''''....".....'''' a> c> CD - 0' en
~I~ ~ ~ 8 t t t,tlttit t <J ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <:i ~ <:i <:i ~$ ~ ~ Ii! ~ RJ RJ,~ ~ ~ ~ RJ RJ RJ,~" 0, 0,,; 0, 0, 0,"1;1;1~ ~ ~"~ 8 @,~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 0, ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I'~ ~ 8" ~ ~ ~,~ ~I~'I~~ ~ ~~)~ ~ ~ ~ H:" ~ ~ ~!i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M .'I~ ~ ~ ~ p
1'1 I I' i i ! 1 ' i i i iT i i I I 'i! ~
~.1~
~ I ~
:JJ
, ~ > I?':r: me
~ ' ;p.C
~ ocr;Z CJ
~ ;o~ ~
~ 0 n?':
- ;:;~
~ ...,
~ rn
CJJ
~i5
Z~b
I en 01\.:100.................-10--'
N ...... rv.t>.01~::e:p:
ozr-
, -<m
I cn~
z
m
15
::I:
!!:
;:u
::I:
o
o
'2
D
Q ~
~ <0 m
a -~ ~
~r-<~
~ S;::D rri
~ ~)> ~
~ mz ~
!ii C) (') rii
o
:D I 3:
~ ~
r-
o
;:u -I
m
~ ~ ~~ r-ab en
OCIl\.)cnr-.J(..oJ......o~gm-l c:
.... '" ~a> UJ::!i~ i:
;;: i:
r- >
~
-I
>
m
r-
m
'"
Co
Q
i'1
U)
".
~
U)
"
>:
-<
-<
0-<
-<0
~ ~.
c:......
!f1;
;;:
I---
en
55,;JO
~~~
I" x
en en en
53::u:::c;c::c ~ooooooo a5C1')
~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ s.:.
>>>> >>
,... co ,...
enil:
C:c:
ID.
-1-
oil!
-Ie:
~N
z
m
Gi
~ ~ .....:r::
CD"U CC;:c;:J:J;D ~ m
S.:. su.~~z~
;b)> O:r::
,...,... 0
o
!2
ill r-
r- Z 0
:--I--J ~g:g:~r- ~
U'I U'I ~ >< ><)()Io 0 CJJ
f;?; )> ~ f}:: ~;:u ~ N
~ ~ ~
r-
z 0
9 -f
o >
~~~~g~ ~ ~
z >
:::; -f
en >
IIJ
r-
m
...
'" ~ ~
I: ~ ~ ~
o
"'~~c;"'-I ~C;r>JWf'VOO.f>. -J"'-I:""~
-Jr>J)(-.)0) "'~Oi:DNONU. -J-.) ww
f;/';i]/';/'; f;/';/';/';/';/';/,;/,; f;/'; ~~
;;
A
QJ
~
'"
"'
s
i'i
Co
-::z
::');
ClJC/)(f.ICIJ
~~~ e~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~i
...... ~ ~ ~ ~ :t>
z
0....
. 0
r-....
0)-
-<r-
en
00
n
"" ~~~~
c:c: 0 00 !Oil: r-
"'''' ~~~~ 0
" " ~ ~ " ." en", ~H~ >
00 mm Z
~~ un z z z z On "."
"' ~ "'"' ~~ cc i';:>i; c
~~ r-r-r-r- ~ ~~ c:c: "" c:
-<-<-<-< IIJIII en
55 ;r;r;;:o;:u;;:o m m m
mfTImm
CIJ(f)Cf)Cf)
I.
(J)
~O~ffi
-n m
-f