Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports /2007/07/25 REVISED AGENDA MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA 6:00 p.m. Wednesday, July 25, 2007 City Hall Council Chambers 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL I MOTIONS TO EXCUSE: Planning Commission: Felber Vinson Moctezuma_Bensoussan Tripp_Clay ton_ Speth man_ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE and MOMENT OF SILENCE: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 13, 2007 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Opportunity for members of the public to speak to the Planning Commission on any subject matter within the Commissions' jurisdiction, but not an item on today's agenda. Each speaker's presentation may not exceed three minutes. 1. Special Order of Business: Appointment of a Planning Commission Representative to serve on the selection panel for the consultant to facilitate Southwest Community Outreach effort Presenter: Nancy Lytle Planning Commission Agenda -2- July 25, 2007 2. PUBLIC HEARING: PCZ 06-06; Consideration of a zoning modification to change the existing zone classification from R-3 P-9, Apartment Residential/Precise Plan, nine dwelling units per acre to ILP, Limited Industrial/Precise Plan, for a 1.0-acre parcel located at 696 Naples Street. Health Advances, USA. Project Manager: Richard Zumwalt, Associate Planner 3. Information Item: Code Enforcement Overview. Presenter: Doug Leeper, Code Enforcement Manager DIRECTOR'S REPORT: COMMISSION COMMENTS: ADJOURNMENT: To a Regular Planning Commission on August 8, 2007. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA 6:00 p.m. June 13, 2007 Council Chambers 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL I MOTIONS TO EXCUSE: Members Present: Felber, Vinson, Moctezuma, Bensoussan, Tripp, Clayton, Spethman Absent: None ORAL COMMUNICATION: No public input. 6:14:46 PM1. PUBLIC HEARING: PCC 06-42 I PCZ 07-02; Consideration of the following applications filed by St. Rose of Lima Parish for 3.9 acres located at the northeast corner of Third Avenue and H Street: a. PCC 06-42; Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for the renovation and expansion of an existing church campus. b. PCZ 07-02; Consideration of a Rezone Application to establish Precise Plan Modifying District (P) for the underlying Apartment Residential Zone (R-3), and adopt Precise Plan Guidelines for the subject property. Staff recommends that public hearing be opened and continued to June 27, 2007. MSC (SpethmanNinson) (7-0) to continue public hearing to June 27, 2007. Motion carried. 6:16:01 PM 2. PUBLIC HEARING: PCC 07-60; Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to allow live entertainment and the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the full-service restaurant at 2230 Proctor Valley Road, Suite B-102 and B-103. Background: Caroline Young reported that the Zoning Administrator approved a Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of the proposed restaurant and the sale of beer and wine, that is scheduled to be open in July. The SPA plan allows the Planning Commission Minutes - 2 - June 13, 2007 administrative approval of a Conditional Use Permit for restaurants serving beer and wine, but without a bar or live entertainment. The approved hours of operation with the sale of beer and wine is Sunday through Thursday, from 8 a.m. to 11 p.m. and Friday through Saturday, 8 a.m. to 1 :30 a.m. The applicant is requesting to add live entertainment and a full service bar and modify the hours of operation to have the restaurant stay open later on Wednesday and Thursday. Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution approving PCC 07-60 to allow live entertainment and the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the full service restaurant at 2230 Proctor Valley Road, Ste B-102 and B-103, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. 6:56:46 PM Public Hearing Opened. 6:57:09 PM Marco Polo Cortes, applicant's representative disclosed that he had spoken by phone individually with each Planning Commissioner. Mr. Cortes assured the Commission that Time Out Sports Bar and Grill will be a neighborhood restaurant with a full menu and will not be turned into a bar/night club. Mr. Cortes is available to answer any questions or concerns from the Commission 6:58:28 PM Cmr. Speth man inquired if they planned to have security on the premises. 6:58:40 PM Mr. Cortes responded that they will have three off-duty officers as security during the hours of 9:00 p.m. to closing time. 6:58:51 PM Cmr. Bensoussan stated that in light of the fact that the applicant is requesting that live music and dancing be allowed, Condition of Approval #8 of the Planning Commission Resolution, in her opinion is ambiguous because it reads, "... There shall be no live entertainment such as dancing". Staff clarified that there shall be no dance performancers allowed. 7:04: 15 PM Cmr. Clayton asked for clarification on whether the total restaurant seating capacity is 95 or 79 when taking into account the removal of 4 tables to accommodate room to make a 152 sf dance floor. Ms. Young responded that once the 4 tables are removed, it would reduce the capacity to 79 seats, however, the maximum occupancy is determined by the Fire Marshal at the time the building permits are issued. 7:05:14 PM Cmr. Spethman stated he sees no need to further elaborate on the language of Condition #8, and is satisfied with its clarity that there will be no live dancing entertainment, i.e. a dance review. Cmr. Spethman stated he supports the proposal as presented subject to a review in six months and language addressing the requirement to have on-site security, which the applicant has already stated there will be. Planning Commission Minutes - 3 - June 13, 2007 7:06:33 PM Cmr. Moctezuma has no problem with tightening up the language regarding the live dancing entertainment, and she would also like to clarify that the security with remain until all patrons have left the premises. 7:08:34 PM Cmr. Felber questioned if the applicant would be willing to work with the Police Department in establishing a cap on the number of calls for service. Mr. Cortes responded that he could not support this for the reason that there will be a total of four restaurants in that shopping center that have a beer and wine license. They way the ABC operates, is that they look at the census tract and they determine the crime based on the total calls for service in that census tract, therefore, they could be bunched in for something over which they have no control. 7:10:25 PM Public Hearing Closed. 7:10:52 PM Cmr. Bensoussan stated that this type of venue is needed in this area, not only so that patrons don't have to drive a distance elsewhere, i.e. downtown San Diego, but also for safety considerations in reducing potential drunk drivers from driving long distances. Cmr. Bensoussan also supports the hours of operation, with last call and end of entertainment being at 1 :00 a.m. and closing of the establishment at 1:30 a.m. 7:13:52 PM Cmr. Vinson stated he could support the proposal with clarification on the Conditions of Approval that they state in writing the following: . That no live dancing performers shall be allowed . That there will be security provided 30 minutes after end of closing . That the last call and end of live music end at 1 :00 a.m. and closing at 1 :30 a.m. . That there shall be no speakers in the patio area 7:14:53 PM Cmr. Tripp concurs with the previous statements that this type of entertainment venue is needed in this area and can support the project as conditioned with the caveat that it come back to the Planning Commission after a six- month period. 7:18:12 PM Cmr. Bensoussan noted that Condition #10 states that the CUP is subject to review six months after the date of approval by the Zoning Administrator., and asked for clarification on the Commissions' wishes to have it come back to the Planning Commission and not just the Zoning Administrator. Furthermore, Cmr. Bensoussan recommended that the six-month period be extended to nine months because it would give a more accurate picture of the restaurant's operation since it takes a few months for new businesses to get established and for people to find out about them. 7:19:31 PM MSC (BensoussanlTripp) (7-0) that the Planning Commission adopt the resolution approving PCC 07-60 to allow live entertainment and the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the full-service restaurant, with the following additional conditions of approval: . That Condition #1 be modified to read that the hours of operation are Sunday through Tuesday, 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Wednesday through Planning Commission Minutes -4- June 13, 2007 Saturday 8:00 a.m. to 1 :00 a.m. last call and end of live music entertainment with closing time at 1 :30 a.m. . That security be provided 30 minutes after closing . No speakers allowed outside in the patio area . Clarify the language on Condition #8 stating that there will be no live dance performers allowed . That Condition #10 be amended to read that there will be a 9-month review by the Planning Commission instead of a 6-month review by the Zoning Administrator. Motion carried. 7:27:26 PM 3. PUBLIC HEARING: PCS 06-13; Consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map known as Napa Place, Chula Vista Tract 06-13 to subdivide 1.7 acres at 445 First Avenue into nine (9) Single Family Residential lots and one (1) common lot containing the private access road and guest parking. Background: Caroline Young, Project Manager gave an overview of the proposal as presented in the staff report. Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCS 06- 13, recommending that the City Council, 1) adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration IS 06-20; 2) approve the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map known as Napa Place, Chula Vista Tract 06-13 allowing to subdivide 1.7 acres at 445 First Avenue into nine Single Family Residential lots and one common lot containing the private access road and guest parking. Commission Comments: 7:32:20 PM Cmr. Spethman inquired if the Fire Department is satisfied and signed-off on approval for this proposal based on emergency vehicles being abie to maneuver and have access to that area. Ms. Young responded that there is a requirement for "hammer-head" lots be a minimum of 90 feet long; this particular lot exceeds that length, therefore, the Fire Department has no problem with it. Additionally, the applicant shall provide a private fire hydrant at the hammerhead in accordance with the Fire Department requirement. Cmr. Felber asked for further clarification on the rationale for having the phone intercom system for the entry access gate be located on the passenger side of the driveway and not the drivers side. Ms. Young responded that the entry road is only 26 feet wide, and having the intercom system located in the center of the road would restrict access for emergency vehicles, therefore, the intercom would be located on the right side of the curb on the passenger's side. Planning Commission Minutes - 5 - June 13, 2007 7:37:34 PM Cmr. Tripp noted that in several instances, the staff report talks about private streets, roads and improvements, and also noted that Condition #22. under CC&R's stated that, ".... No private facilities shall be requested to become public...". Cmr. Tripp asked if private improvement are required to be constructed to public standards. 7:39:28 PM Silvester Evetovich, City of Chula Vista Engineer, stated that the City has different standards for private and public streets, but mostly in terms of width and volume capacity. Private streets will be constructed structurally sound, but not necessarily to public street standards because of lesser traffic. That is why the HOA is required to maintain the private infrastructure because its not up to City standards, therefore, the City is not required to maintain it. 751 :01 PM Fernando Orvananos, developer and Tony Ambros, Planner with Burkett and Wong Engineers stated they've been working on this project for approximately two years. Mr. Orvananos also indicated that although the market conditions at this time are not optimal, they plan to move forward on developing the project in the coming year; they indicated they were available to answer any questions. Cmr. Spethman asked the applicant if once he subdivides the lot does he intended to build individual homes on each of the nine lots or does he intend to sell the lots individually so that the new owner can build their own custom home. City Attorney David Miller reminded the Commission that what they are considering tonight is the Tentative Subdivision Map and not what may, or may not potentially be built there in the future. 8:01 :28 PM Cmr. Tripp stated that in light of the City Attorney's previous comment, he noted that the staff report and presentation included the approval of a gated entry, therefore, he asked what relation does the gated entry have to do with the Tentative Subdivision Map approval. Mr. Miller responded that within the Tentative Subdivision Map there are several conditions related to the infrastructure, but nothing related to buildings that would commit the developer to build on those pads. Once the property is subdivided, the developer could decide to sell the lots and not build on them, however, the infrastructure is what is being required, and the Commission tonight would be making a determination on the Map and entry gate. 8:04:28 PM MSC (Spethman/Clayton) (7-0) That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCS 06-13, recommending that the City Council, 1) adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration IS 06-20; 2) approve the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map known as Napa Place, Chula Vista Tract 06-13 allowing to subdivide 1.7 acres at 445 First Avenue into nine Single Family Residential lots and one common lot containing the private access road and guest parking. Planning Commission Minutes - 6 - June 13, 2007 4. PUBLIC HEARING: PCS 06-04; Consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide 1.628 acres into twenty-four (24) condominium units for individual ownership at 1419 Tobias Drive. (Quasi-Judicial) 8:05:50 PM Background: Ann Pease, project manager reported that the proposal is to consider a Tentative Subdivision to convert an existing 36 year old apartment complex into 24 condominium units for individual ownership. When the DRC first reviewed the projects, it was much dated and in need of improvements both exterior and interior. When final DRC approval was granted, it was a much improved, attractive and up to date complex. There is a proposed new landscape plan providing 796 sf of open space per unit. Additionally, two parking spaces are provided per unit and storage space above what is required by Code is provided on the balcony and inside each unit. Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCS 06-04 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, recommending that the City Council approve the Condominium Tentative Map. Public Hearing Opened. 8: 13:30 PM Bruce Taylor applicant on behalf of the owners stated he was available to answer questions. Cmr. Felber asked how old is the roof on the units, and what types of incentives are they offering to existing tenants. Mr. Taylor stated the roof is three to four years old. They are offering existing tenants the first right of refusal to purchase those units. As far as financial incentives, they've not discussed that, however, most likely they would be open to discussing assisting tenants with their relocation expenses. 815:44 PM Cmr. Bensoussan noted that the renovation of the units is extensive and it would appear that the tenants who plan to buy their unit would need to vacate the premises in order for the renovation to take place; she asked how the developer intended to address this situation. Mr. Taylor stated that in effect, the premises would need to be vacated for the renovation project, therefore, they would hope to be able to phase the remodel and relocate those tenants who wish to purchase into another unit that has been vacated. Public Hearing Closed. Cmr. Bensoussan stated that she is please with the extensive renovation that will take place to make it an overall very attractive complex, and commended the applicant for going above and beyond in meeting all of the parking, storage space, and open space requirements. In her opinion, this is a prototype for condo conversion projects because it is upgrading the housing stock and improving the surrounding community, instead of just slapping a coat of new paint and barely meeting the minimum requirements. Planning Commission Minutes -7 - June 13, 2007 8:19:14 PM MSC (Clayton/Spethman) (7-0) that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCS 06-04 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, recommending that the City Council approve the Condominium Tentative Map. 8:20:22 PM director's report. . Jim Hare reported that a memorandum regarding The Taste of Italy has been distributed to the Commission, simply reporting that there have been no incidences, no causes, no calls, no code enforcement actions. . Mr. Hare further stated that a survey is yet to be completed of the surrounding neighborhood who came to testify against the restaurant because of the myriad of quality of life impacts the restaurant was having on their community. If after the survey is conducted it is determined that they are overall satisfied that the concerns have been mitigated and properly addressed, staff will make a determination at that time whether to proceed with scheduling a public hearing for them to come before the Planning Commission once again for review. . The Joint GMOC/Planning Commission/City Council meeting for June 21, 2007 has been cancelled. In lieu of that meeting, staff is proposing to use that meeting date on June 21 st to hold the Procedures Workshop for the Planning Commission; confirmation on that workshop will be forthcoming. Meeting adjourned to a regular Planning Commission meeting on June 27, 2007. Diana Vargas Secretary to the Planning Commission CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT Item: Meeting Date: .L 7/25/07 ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: PCZ 06-06; Consideration of a zoning modification to change the existing zone classification from R-3 P- 9, Apartment Residential/ Precise Plan, nine dwelling units per acre to ILP, Limited Industrial/ Precise Plan, for a 1.0-acre parcel located At 696 Naples Street - Health Advances, USA SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning and Building INTRODUCTION This is a zoning modification request to change from an existing R-3 P-9 (Apartment Residential/ Precise Plan with nine dwelling units per acre) to ILP (Limited Industrial/ Precise Plan), for a 1.0-acre site located at 696 Naples Street. BACKGROUND This parcel was part of the Montgomery Annexation, a 3.5 square mile territory annexed to the City of Chula Vista on December 31, 1985, and included in the Montgomery Specific Plan. The site was used for many years as a packaging facility, and then by the Wilbur-Ellis Company as a fertilizer/landscaping business. On March 28, 1989, the one-acre parcel was rezoned to R-3 P-9 (Apartment Residential, Precise Plan, 9 units per acre). The intent was to permit "a residential density, which is in keeping with the density anticipated by the Montgomery Specific Plan". The multi-family residential land use designation for this property was reconsidered during the latest General Plan update, and was changed back to Limited Industrial. This rezoning request is in accordance with the recently adopted General Plan. Because of circumstances likely to be involved in redevelopment of this parcel, a specific Land Use and Transportation (LUT) General Plan Policy was attached to the property. LUT 42.14 states the following: PCZ-06-06 Page NO.2 "Concurrent with the approval of zoning for industrial uses at the northwest corner of Colorado Avenue and Naples Street in the South Broadway District, ensure that light industrial uses on Colorado Street are designed and constructed to: front on Colorado Street; provide parking and entry door access on the west side of buildings; and be appropriately buffered from residential uses". The rezoning will be structured to comply with these and other relevant General Plan requirements, using the Precise Plan Modifying District, which will be addressed later in this report. The site is occupied by a vitamin manufacturing company, Health Advances, which is a non-conforming use under the current zoning district, but a permitted use in the Limited Industrial zone. Thus, changing the zone designation will make the current land use into conformance with the Limited Industrial General Plan land use designation and zoning. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the proposed rezone was adequately covered in previously adopted General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report, EIR 05-01. Thus, no further environmental review or documentation is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached Planning Commission Resolution PCZ-06-06, recommending that the City Council approve an amendment to the Zoning Maps established by Section 19.18.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, rezoning one acre at 696 Naples Street from Apartment Residential (R-3 P-9) to Limited Industrial (ILP), based on the findings contained in the attached Draft City Council Ordinance. DISCUSSION Project Site Characteristics: The project site is a 43,702 sq. ft. (approx. one-acre) parcel located at the northwest corner of Naples Street and Colorado Avenue (see Attachment 1, Locator Map). It is essentially rectangular-shaped, approximately 130 feet wide by 330 feet deep. The site contains an existing 12,160 sq. ft. steel building, which has occupied the site for the last 25 years. The existing building is setback 55 feet from Naples Street, 22 feet PCZ-06-06 Page NO.3 from Colorado Street, 30 feet from the railroad tracks, and 13 feet from the northerly property line. Since it is adjacent to the railroad and there is a private rail spur that enters the parcel, the western property line has a jagged configuration to accommodate the rail spur (see Attachment 2, Site Plan). On its north property line, the site is immediately adjacent to an industrial complex, which continues north to Moss Street. To the south of the site across Naples Street is Harborside Elementary School, and to the east across Colorado Avenue is a single-family residential neighborhood, which continues almost to Broadway. On its west property line is the existing railroad line used primarily as a trolley line, with Industrial Avenue and a trailer park to the west of the railroad line. Site and Surrounding Area - Land Use Designations and Existing Land Uses: General Plan CV Municipal Code Existing Land Use Zoninn Site Limited Industrial Apartment Residential Industrial - drug manufacturing (R-3 P9) (vitamins) North Limited Industrial Limited Industrial (IL) Existing Light Industrial Complex South Public/Quasi Public (PQ) Single-Family Residential Existing School - Harborside (R-1) Elementarv School East Single-Family Single-Family Residential Existing Single-Family Residential Residential IR-1 ) (R-1) Neiohborhood West Open Space (aSP) Limited Industrial (ILP) Existing Trolley Tracks Project Description: The project consists of rezoning the one-acre Project Site from R-3 P-9 Apartment Residential, Precise Plan, nine dwelling units per acre, to ILP, Limited Industrial Precise Plan per CVMC Section 19.44.010. The rezone is consistent with and will implement the recently adopted General Plan Update. In recommending approval of the requested Rezone to the City Council, staff relies upon the following points: PCZ-06-06 Page NO.4 Chula Vista Municipal Code Compliance The current industrial use, which as stated above, involves the manufacturing (re- packaging) of vitamin products with limited types of raw materials. The use is permitted by right pursuant to CVMC 19.44.020(M), provided certain chemicals are not used on site, as specified in CVMC 19.44.050, "Prohibited Uses and Processes" (see Attachment 3). Any prohibited use or primary production using these prohibited substances could be abated via application of the Performance Standards, CVMC Chapter 19.66. General Plan Goals and Obiectives Chapter 5, the Land Use and Transportation Element of the General Plan, includes the site in the South Broadway District, which is located between Industrial Blvd. on the west, Fifth Avenue on the east, L Street on the north, and Anita Street on the south (see Attachment 4. South Broadway District, Fig. 5-22). Chapter 5 also contains policy LUT 42.5, which states: "Designate uses on the west side of Colorado Street as Light Industrial." Approval of this rezone will make the site consistent with the Limited Industrial land use designation of the northerly adjacent parcels. Chapter 5 also specifies, in Section 7.0 - "Planning Factors, Objectives and Policies", that compatible land use and edge transitions are essential, and in Section 7.5 it further states: "Uses should be appropriately buffered or incompatibilities should be addressed through.. .mitigation of impacts to adjacent uses in the area." To address this important General Plan policy, staff recommends a number of specific Precise Plan standards, which are intended to buffer the project site from the residential neighborhood to the east across Colorado Street. Thus, Limited Industrial zoning with appropriate development standards will address the General Plan vision for this area and will encourage projects that are sensitive to the surrounding area. Precise Plan The Precise Plan Modifying District was established by the previous rezoning action to R-3-P-9, but specific Precise Plan Standards were not adopted at that time. This zone modification includes specific Precise Plan Development standards to address two alternative development scenarios, involving the remodeling of the existing building, and the demolition of the building and redevelopment of the site. The following types of PCZ-06-06 Page NO.5 Precise Plan development standards are proposed: . Site planning standards including the re-Iocation of openings such as loading docks and building entries to the west side of the building; . Architectural design; . Walls, fencing and landscaping to help buffer the perimeter of the site; . Signage; . Site lighting. These Precise Plan Development standards have been crafted to implement the requirements of Land Use and Transportation (LUT) Policy 42.14 applicable to this parcel. The proposed Precise Plan guidelines will be included in the Draft City Council Ordinance, and are described in more detail in Exhibit B of the Ordinance (Attachment 6). Health Advances has applied for Design Review approval of a proposed building addition. The Design Review plans will be redesigned based upon the Precise Plan development standards and Design Manual guidelines. Prior to approval of building permits, the applicant must obtain approval of plans showing compliance with applicable zoning requirements, including the Precise Plan guidelines. CONCLUSION: For the reasons mentioned above, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Planning Commission resolution recommending that the City Council approve Zone Change PCZ-06-06, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the attached Draft City Council Ordinance (Attachment 6). DECISION-MAKER CONFLICTS: Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the Planning Commissioners and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property, which is subject to this action. FISCAL IMPACT There are no fiscal impacts from the preparation of this report and the processing of the Zone Change. All costs are covered by the deposit accounts. PCZ-06-06 Page NO.6 ATTACHMENTS 1 Locator Map 2 Conceptual Site Plan 3 CVMC Section 19.44.050 4 South Broadway District, General Plan Fig. 5-22 5 Planning Commission Resolution 6 Draft City Council Ordinance 7 Ownership Disclosure Form Prepared by: Rich Zumwalt, AICP, Associate Planner, Planning and Building Department J; planninglcasefilesl07\PCZIIPCZ 06-06\PCZ0606.Agenda Stmt I I , , , , , , , , , , , \ \ \ \ , , , , , " ,~ 'CD ,~ ,~ , I I I I I I I I Zone Modification from R3P9 to ILP Harborside Elementarv School Office C HULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DE PARTM E NT LOCATOR PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C) APPLlCAN1' Health Advances USA ZONE MODIFICATION PROJECT Request: Change zone from 1.0 acres lot from R3P9 (Apartment ADORESS, 696 Naples SI. Residential Precise Plan 9 d.u./ac.) to IL (Limited Industrial). SCALE: FILE NUMBER: NORTH No Scale PCZ-06-06 Related cases: IS-06-019, DRC-06-22 L:\Gabe Fifes\Locators\pcz0606Jand_uses.cdr 07.12.07 .~ v..-,~_.",._,._,_._..,,_. . ~_._-~---" ,~ ---'.'.-',-."'"---. "....--'-"~"-".--"- . I- I . . . . . . . . . . ~ CbuIa Vista Municipal Code F. Public and private building material saJes yards. service yards. storage yards. and equipment rental; G. Minor anto repair; H. Laundries,laundry services, and dyeing and cleaning plants, except large-scale operations; 1. Car washing establishments. subject to the provisions ofCVMC 19.58.060; J. Plumbing and heating shops; K. Exterminating services; L. Animal hospitals and veterinarians. subject to the provisions of CYMC 19.58.050; M. The manufactnre of food products, drugs, pharmaceuticals and the like, excluding those in CVMC 19.44.050; N. Electrical substations and gas regulator sta- tions, subject to the provisions of CYMC 19.58.140; O. Temporary tract signs, subject to the provi- sionsofCVMC 19.58.320 and 19.60.470;. _. P. Any other limited manufactmed use which is detertnined by the commission to be of the same general character as the above uses; Q. Agricultural uses as provided inCVMC 19.16.030. (Oni. 1356 ~ 1,1971; Qrd. 1281 !} I. 1970; Ord.1212 ~ 1, 1969; prior code !} 33.513(B)). . Code reviser's nOle: This section amended to confonn with provisions ofOtd. 1575. 1974. 19.44.030 Accessory uses and buildings. Accessory uses permitted in an 1- L zone include: A. Administrative. executive and fmancial offices and incidentaJ services. such as restaurants to serve employees, when conducted on the pre- mises; B. Other accessory uses and buildings custom- arily appurtenant to a permitted use; C. Retail sales of products produced and manu- facwred on the site; D. Caretaker houses; E. Satellite dish antennas are permitted in *" accordance with the provisions of CVMC 19.22.030(F)(I) through (9) and (II) through (13). (Ord. 2160 ~ 1. 1986; Ord. 2108 ~ 1. 1985; Ord. 1281 ~ 1. 1970; Ord. 1212 fi 1,1969; prior code fi 33.513(C)). . .. .. III ~ r 19.44.040 Conditional uses. Conditional uses pennitted in an I-L zone include: A. Machine shops and sheet metal shops; lilT/} Qjf M f:..AJ, ---3 19.44.050 B. Service stations, subject to the conditions in CYMC 19.58.280: C. Steel fabrication; D. Restaurants, delicatessens and similar uses; E. Dri ve-in theaterS, subject to the conditions of CVMC 19.58.120; F. Major auto repair, engine rebuilding and paint shops; G. Commercial parldng lots and garages; H. Plastics and other synthetics manufacturing; 1. Building heights exceeding three and one- half stories or 45 feet; J. Unclassified uses, as set forth in Chapter 19.54CVMC; K. Trucking yards. terminals and distributing operations; L. The retail sale of such bulky items as furni- ture. carpets and other similar items; M. Retail distribution centers and manufactur- ers' outlets which require cxtcnsi ve floor areas for the storage and display of men:handise. and the high-volume. warehouse-type sale of goods and retail uses which arc related to and supportive of existing, on-site retail distribution centers of man- ufacturers' outlets. ConditionaJ use pennit applica- tions for the establishment of retail commerciaJ uses. covered by the provisions of this subsection. shall be considered by the city council subsequent to its receipt of recommendations thereon from the planning commission; N. Roof-mounted satellite dishes. subject to the standards set fonh in CYMC 1930.040; O. Recycling collection centers. subject to the provisions of CYMC 19.58.345: P. Hazardous waste facilities. subject to the pro- visionsofCYMC 19.58.178. (Onl2542fi 4,1993; Ord. 2252 ~ 10, 1988; Ord. 2233 fi 10. 1987; Ord. 216O~ I. 1986; Ord.2108 fi I, 1985;Ord.2031 ~ 1. 1983; Ord. 1927 fi I, 1980; Ord. 1698 fi 1. 1976; Ord. 1356 ~ I, 1971; Ord. 1281 ~ I. 1970; On!. 1212 ~ I. 1969; prior code ~ 33.513(D)). 19.44.050 Prohibited uses and processes. '*' Prohibited uses in an I-L z.one include: A. Manufacturing uses and processes involving the primary production of products from laW mate- rials, including the following materials and uses: I. Asphalt, cement, charcoaJ and fuel bri- quettes, 2. Rubber, chemical and allied products, and soap and detergents, 3. Coal. coke and tar products and the manu- facturing of explosives, fertilizers, gelatin. animal glue and size, 19-99 (Revised 1104) Setbacks in Feet Front E,denor Side Yanl Side Rear Buildings 20' IS' 0" 0" Signs 0 0 19.44.060 4. Turpentine, matches, paint and other com- bustible materials. 5. Stockyards. slaughtemouses and render- ing plants, 6. The storage of fireworks or explosives. 7. Industrial metaJ, waste rag. glass or paper salvage operations and slag piles, 8. Fish, sauerkraut, vinegar and similar uses. 9. Brewing or distilling of liquors or perfume manufactUring: B. The following processes: nitrating of cotton Dr other materials; foundries; reduction. refining. smelting. alloying. rolling, drawing and extruding of metal or mew ores; refining of petroleum pr0d- ucts; distillation of wood or bones; storage. curing or tanning of raw. green or salted hides or skins; and grain milling; C. Any other use which is detennined by the commission to be of the general character as the above uses. (Ord. 1281 !i I, 1970; Ord. 1212 !i I, 1%9; prior code !i 33.513(E)). Lot Area (sq. ft.) Lot Conrage (max. %) 10.000 50 19.44.060 Sign regulations. RepeaLed by Ord. 2924 63. 2003. (Ord. 2309A 9 12. 1989: Orc!. 1575 9 1. 1974; On!. 1356 9 I. 1971; Ord. 1281 91. 1970; On!. 12129 I, 1969; prior code ~ 33.513(F)). 19.44.070 Height regulations. No building Dr structure shall exceed three and one-half stories Dr 45 feet; except, that any building or structure erected to such a height or less that would be detrimenw. in the opinion of the commis- sion. to the light, air or privacy of any other struc- ture or use. existing or reasonably to be anticipated. may be reduced. Exceptiolis are provided in CVMC 19.16.040. (Ord. 1356 !i 1. 1971; Ord. 1281 !i 1. 1970;Ord.12]2!i 1,1969;priorcode!i33.513(G)). 19.44.080 Area. lot coverage and yBrd requirements. The following minimum requirements shall be observed. except as provided in CYMC 19.16.020 and 19.16.060 through 19.16.080 and where increased for conditional uses: *Or not less than that specified on the building line map which takes precedence shall be provided and mainJained. (See CVMC 19.44.090 through 19.44.180 for other required sc;tbacks.) "Except when adjoining an R or A zone. or areas designall:d for future residential or agricultural development on the Chula Vista general plan, then not less than 50 feet. (Ord. 1356 ~ 1. ]97]; Ord. 1281 !i 1. 1970; Ore!. 1212 ~ 1. 1%9; prior code!i 33.513(H)). 19.44.090 Performance standards. All uses permined by this title shall be subject to initial and continued compliance with the perfor- mance standards in Chapter 19.66 CVMC. (On!. 1281 ~ I, 1970; Ore!. 1212 ~ 1, 1969; prior code ~ 33.513(IXI)). 19.44.100 Fuel restrictions. ManufactUring and industrial processes in an I-L "one shall use only gas or electricity as a fuel; pro- vided. however, that oil burning equipment may be installed for standby purposes only. (On!. 1281 ~ I, 1970; Ord. 1212 ~ 1. 1969; prior code 933.513 (IX2)). (RevlS8d 1104) , 19-100 19.44.110 Setbacks from residential or agricultural zone - Loading faolities. In any l-L "one directly across the street from any R or A zone, or areas designated for furore res.cidential or agricultural development on the general plan, the loading facilities and structures shall be a distance of at least 30 feet from said street. (Ord. 1281 !i I. 1970; Ord. 1212 ~ I, 1969; prior code 9 33.513(1)(3)). 19.44.120 Landscaping. The site shall be Jandscaped in conformance with the landscaping manuaJ of the city. and approved by the planning depanment. (Ord. J281 .rI.~ Chula f~~' Vista ~[5l Vision 2020 Southwest Planning Area South Broadway District :0; , "''0 -6~ oSlO :.. ~ ~ (Q A1T1UfMf:fJT L.( '::. ~G> '- ). Il.<t L St. LlMI7~D If,DUS1R:,'L RlS.li.GJi , Q ,. UllH..:D L...)uS~Rj',L RES. LC'N-~lED_ ""..; ~j w ~ " " ~ "' -"",(11)",,, => co. "' '" '" Moss St L:WITED I ~ iJj W " Naples St. Project Site RE1AI_ ~ :;; ~ ~ I ~ I (',] w " Oxford St REI h.L RES. 11.(:11-: r:::I;',ll Palomar St. a,PEN...- vP':"c.,;: LI"'.1EC INJUS1"Rli\L LEGEND RES. M:::C:. @) EXISTING TRANSIT STATION ,.. _ _ . u _ FUTURE TRANSIT ROUTE ~ AREAS OF CHANGE ~ clMITD ~NDJS iRIAL 4,,- -""SI. -_.~~" -"-_-.- EXJSTlNG LAND USE ----- NOT TO SCALE Figure 5-22 Page LUT-148 City of Chula Vista General Plan L:\Gabe FileslProjects by Requeslor\Rich ZumwaltIPCZ-06-06\figure 5-22,al 07.06,07 -4 !T4cH1A elUT S- RESOLUTION NO. PCZ-06-006 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAPS ESTABLISHED BY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.18.010 BY REZONING A ONE-ACRE P ARCEL LOCATED AT 696 NAPLES STREET FROM R-3-P-9, APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL, PRECISE PLAN, 9 D.U./AC. TO ILP, LIMITED INDUSTRIAL, PRECISE PLAN, AND ADOPTING PRECISE PLAN STANDARDS. - HEALTH ADVANCES USA. WHEREAS, the area of land, which is the subject of this ordinance is diagrammaticaIly represented in Exhibit "A" which is incorporated into the ordinance by this reference, and for the purpose of general description consists of one acre at 696 Naples Street ("Project Site or Site"); and WHEREAS, on February 28,2006, a Rezone application was filed by Health Advances, USA ("Applicant") with the Planning and Building Department of the City of Chula Vista requesting an amendment to the adopted zoning map or maps established by Section 19.18.010 ofthe Chula Vista Municipal Code in order to rezone the Project Site from the R-3-P-9 (Multi-Family Residential, Precise Plan) Zone to the ILP (Limited Industrial, Precise Plan) zone and Precise Plan Standards to guide the development/redevelopment of the Project Site ("Project"); and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the proposed project was adequately covered in previously adopted General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report, EIR 05-01. Thus, no further environmental review or docUlllentation is necessary; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Building Director set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet ofthe exterior boundaries of the property, at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and, WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m., July 25,2007, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends that the City Council adopt the attached draft ordinance approving the Zone District Modification, including Precise Plan Standards, based on the findings contained in the attached Draft City Council Ordinance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this Resolution be transmitted to the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 25th day of July, 2007, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Bill Tripp, Chairperson ATTEST: Diana Vargas, Secretary J:\Planning.,Case File~-07 (FY O{)"07)\PCZ\PCZ-06-06\PCZ0606.PC Reso1.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \ \ \ I I I I I \,-- 101 --n ICD I~ IQ I I I I I I I I I IP CC C HULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPT!ON: C) APPLICANT; Health Advances USA ZONE MODIFICATION PROJECT Request: Change zone from 1.0 acres lot from R3P9 (Apartment AODRESS; 696 Naples SI. Residential Precise Plan 9 d.u./ac.) to IL (Limited Industrial). SCALE: FILE NUMBER: NORTH No Scale PCZ-06-06 Related cases: 15-06-019, DRC-06-22 . ... L:\Gabe Files\Locators\pcz0606_zoning-modification.cdr 07.12.07 47/-4C-1-t.-1..( tIlT G, DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE ZONING MAPS ESTABLISHED BY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.18.010 BY REZONING A ONE ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT 696 NAPLES STREET FROM R-3-P-9, APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL, PRECISE PLAN, NINE DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, TO lLP, LIMITED INDUSTRIAL, PRECISE PLAN, AND ADOPTING PRECISE PLAN STANDARDS. 1. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land, which is the subject of this ordinance is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit "A" and incorporated into the ordinance by this reference, and for the purpose of general description consists of one parcel totaling one acre, located at 696 Naples Street ("Project Site or Site"); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on February 28, 2006, a Zone Modification application was filed by Health Advances, USA, ("Applicant") with the Planning and Building Department of the City of Chula Vista, requesting an amendment to the adopted zoning map or maps established by Section 19.18.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code in order to change the Project Site zone designation ftom the R-3-P-9 (Apartment Residential, Precise Plan, nine dwellings units/acre) to the ILP, Limited Industrial, Precise Plan and adopting Precise Plan Standards to guide the redevelopment of the Project Site ("Project"); and C. Prior Approvals WHEREAS, on December 13, 2005, the Chula Vista City Council adopted a resolution amending the Chula Vista General Plan, which included the re-designation of the project site from Residential Medium (6-11 d.u./ac.) to Limited Industrial; and D. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, the Planning Department set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 ft. of the exterior boundary of the Project Site, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on July 25, 2007, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 276 Fourth Avenue and, after hearing staff presentation and public testimony, voted ~ to recommend that the City Council approve the zone district re-designation, including the Precise Plan Standards in accordance with the findings listed below; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the Project held on July 25, 2007, and the minutes and resolution resulting there from, are incorporated into the record of these proceedings; and Ordinance Page 2 E. City Council Record on Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application and notice of the hearing, together with its purposes given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council held an advertised public hearing on the Project on , 2007, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 276 Fourth Avenue; and -- WHEREAS, after hearing staffs presentation and public testimony, and receiving the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council voted _-_-_ to approve the zone redesignation and Precise Plan standards and adopt a Precise Plan, in accordance with the findings listed below; and n. The City Council of the City Chula Vista ordains as follows: A. Certification of Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the proposed project was adequately covered in previously adopted General P1an Update final Environmental Impact Report, EIR 05-01. Thus, no further environmental review or documentation is necessary. B. Independent Judgment of the City Council WHEREAS, the City Council has exercised its independent review and judgment and concurs with the Planning Commission, and Environmental Review Coordinator's determination that no further environmental review is necessary. C. The rezoning of the Project Site is consistent with the City ofChula Vista General Plan, as approved on 12/13/05, and public necessity, convenience, the general welfare and good zoning practice support the amendment to the Municipal Code. D. The City Of Chula Vista Zoning Map established by Section 19.18.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is amended to rezone the Project Site as depicted in Exhibit "A" from the R-3-P-9 (Apartment Residential, Precise Plan, nine dwellings units/acre) zone, to the ILP (Limited Industrial, Precise Plan) zone, as represented in Exhibit "B". E. Precise Plan Findings 1. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. The City Council finds that the proposed precise plan standards contained in attached Exhibit "8" will have a positive impact on the surrounding neighborhood because the proposed standards allow the applicant to modify the project to be more compatible with adjacent residential development Ordinance Page 3 presently existing in the area. The surrounding area includes single-family dwellings to the east, a school to the south, industrial buildings to the north and a railroad with adjacent mobile homes on the west. This development will establish new standards, which are appropriate for the area, providing more of a transition between existing single-family and light industrial development. 2. That such plan satisfies the following principles for amendment of the "P" modifying district as set forth in CVMC 19.56.041: (a) The City Council finds that the property is an area adjacent and contiguous to a zone allowing different land uses, and the development of a precise plan will allow the adjacent area to coexist with. this land usage, which might otherwise prove incompatible. A rezone to the ILP zone is the most effective way of establishing industrial development standards in a manner that complies with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. (b) Council also finds that the adoption of the Precise Plan standards will allow the project to be designed with a more appropriate transition between it and adjacent single family development, helping buffer the adjacent homes from this use by incorporating walls and landscaped setbacks, as well as moving roll-up doors and truck access to the rear of the building. 3. That any exceptions granted which may deviate from the underlying zoning requirements shall be warranted only when necessary to meet the purpose and application of the Precise Plan. Development of the lot using the standards nonnally required in the IL zone would limit the ability of the Applicant to propose a design which: (a) Meets the goal of buffering the single family residential uses to the east by providing a more significant landscaped buffer along that property line. (b) Provides for truck access to the rear of the building by moving the truck maneuvering space to the south side of the property. These requested deviations under the Precise Plan are warranted in order to achieve the purpose of the Precise Plan Modifying District. 4. The approval of this plan will conform to the General Plan and the adopted policies of the City OfChula Vista. The project has been designed and evaluated in accordance with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. The Precise Plan, as described above, will allow the project to be consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, and the Chula Vista Municipal Code. F. The Precise Plan and Precise Standards as depicted in Exhibit "8" are hereby adopted and are supported by the required findings (CVMC Section 19.56.041, as outlined in Section II (E) above. Ordinance Page 4 III. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by James D. Sandoval Planning and Building Director Ann Moore City Attorney Exhibits: Exhibit A: Rezone Map Exhibit B: Precise Plan Standards I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \ \ I I I I I I, 1(J1 " ICD I~ IQ I I I I I I I I I IP CC CHULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DE PARTM E NT LOCATOR PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C) APPLICANT; Health Advances USA ZONE MODIFICATION PROJECT Request: Change zone from 1.0 acres lot from R3P9 (Apartment ADORESS: 696 Naples St. Residential Precise Plan 9 d.u.lac.) to IL (Limited Industrial). SCALE: FILE NUMBER: NORTH No Scale PCZ-06-06 Related cases: 18.06-019. DRC-06-22 . .. L:\Gabe Files\Locators\pcz0606_zoning-modification.cdr 07.12.07 cXh,IJtT .6 DRAFT EXHIBIT B Precise Plan Standards I. SCENARIO 1- FOR REMODEL OF EXISTING FACILITY: Under this scenario, which could involve the remodel, expansion or alteration of the existing facility, the following Precise Plan Standards shall apply: 1. Site Plan: a. Loading and unloading facilities and activities, including roll up doors, loading docks, forklift and delivery truck maneuvering areas, etc, shall be relocated to the west side of the building. b. All new structures shall observe the required building setbacks prescribed in Section 19.44 of the CYMC. c. Design and location of trash enclosures shall comply with Section 19.58.340 of the CYMC. d. Outdoor storage shall be properly screened from view with decorative type fencing material to match the building, pursuant to CYMC Section 19.44.150. No outdoor storage shall be located on the south or east sides of the building. e. Fire and Explosive hazard: Prohibited uses pursuant to CYMC Section 19.44.050 shall not be pennitted on the premises. All uses involving inflammable and explosive materials shall be subject to initial and continued compliance with all applicable local and state unifonn building codes. 2. Landscaping: a. A twenty-foot landscape buffer shall be provided from the property line along Naples Street and a ten-foot landscape buffer (5 ft. on-site and 5 ft. in the public street right-of-way) shall be provided ITom the property line along Colorado Street, as prescribed by CYMC 19.44.120. b. A five-foot wide planter including a row of trees/ shrubs shall be installed along the west property line to screen the loading/unloading facilities from trolley passengers' view. 3 . Walls/Fencing: a. A six foot wall or fence may be located at any part of the lot, except that in the front yard and exterior side yards, they must comply with setback requirements, which are twenty feet ITom the south property line for the ITont yard and fifteen feet from the east property line for the exterior side yard. Height of walls or fencing within these setback areas is limited to 3-1/2 feet in height. The wall or fencing shall be a solid wall or combination wrought iron and stucco decorative type wall, or similar design. The wall/fence design shall be coordinated with the landscaping program. 4. Building Design: a. The exterior ofthe building shall be treated with stucco or other finish material more compatible with the northerly adjacent industrial buildings and residential area across Colorado Street. b. Under this scenario, the existing roll-up doors along the east side of the building shall be relocated to the west side ofthe building. c. An architectural element, such as an entry tower or similar structure, shall be installed over the main entrance of the bui lding. d. The roof of the building shall be painted to complement the exterior finish colors. 5. Signage: a. One wall mounted, non-illuminated business identification sign is permitted on the Naples Street side ofthe building. The size shall be limited to 1 square foot per lineal foot of building frontage, and sign type should be individual letters or similar. b. One maximum eight foot high, 50 square foot maximum size, non- illuminated freestanding sign is permitted. The sign shall feature opaque background with individual letters. Colors and materials shall match the building design and finish treatment. The sib'll must comply with the sight visibility requirements of the CYMC. 6. Lighting: a. All light sources along the east and south property line shall be shielded in such manner that the lights are directly away from streets and adjoining properties. Lighting fixtures shall be integrated with the building architecturc. The intensity of the lights along the south and east property line shall not exceed 0.5 foot-candles per sq. ft. 11. SCENARIO 11- FOR COMPLETE REDEYELOPMENT OF THE SITE Under this scenario, the existing building is removed in its entirety and new industrial development is built. For this scenario, the following Precise Plan Standards apply: 1. Site Plan: a. Loading and unloading facilities and activities, including roll up doors, loading docks, forklift and delivery truck maneuverings shall be located on the west side of the building. 2 b. All new structures shall observe the required building setbacks prescribed in Section 19.44.080 of the CYMC c. Design and location of trash enclosures shall comply with Section 19.58.340 of the CYMe. d. Outdoor storage shall be properly screened from view with decorative type fencing material to match the building, pursuant to CYMC Section 19.44.150. No outdoor storage shall be located on the south or east side of the property abutting the residential neighborhood across Colorado street. e. Parking lot screening consisting of a combination of decorative walls, and landscaping, shall be provided along public streets. f. Fire and Explosive hazard: Prohibited uses pursuant to CYMC Section 19.44.050 shall not be pennitted on the premises. All uses involving inflammable and explosive materials shall be subject to initial and continued compliance with all applicable local and state unifonn building codes. 2. Landscaping a. A twenty-foot landscape buffer shall be provided from the property line along Naples Street and a fifteen-foot buffer shall be provided from the property line along Colorado Street, as prescribed by CYMC 19.44.120. b. A five-foot wide landscape buffer with a row of trees/ shrubs shall be installed along the west property line to screen the loading unloading activities from trolley passengers' view. 3. Walls/Fencing: a. A six foot wall or fence may be located at any part ofthe lot, except that in the front yard and exterior side yards, they must comply with setback requirements, which are twenty feet from the south property line in for the front yard and fifteen feet /Tom the east property line for the exterior side yard. Height of walls or fencing within these setback areas is limited to 3-1/2 feet in height. The wall or fencing shall be a solid wall or combination wrought iron and stucco decorative type wall, or similar design. The wall/fence design shall be coordinated with the landscaping program. 4. Building Placement and Design: a. Building(s) shall be located along the east setback line to the extent feasible, allowing for loading and unloading facilities and activities on the west side of the building, and driveways, walls and landscaping on the east side of the building. b. Building design shall resemble an office building as viewed /Tom Colorado Street. 3 c. Building design and finish treatment shal1 be compatible with the northerly adjacent industrial buildings and residential area across Colorado Street. d. Building entrance shal1 be identified architectural1y with a tower like structure projecting above the roofline. e. East side ofthe building shal1 be designed to include an office building facade along the east side of the property, facing the residential neighborhood across Colorado Street. 5. Signage a. One wal1 mounted, non-il1uminated business identification sign is permitted on each side of the building. The size shall be limited to 1 square foot per lineal foot of building frontage, and sign type should be individual letters or similar. b. One maximum eight foot high, 50 square foot maximum size, non- il1uminated freestanding sign is permitted. The sign shall feature opaque background with individual letters. Colors and materials shall match the building design and finish treatment. The sign must comply with the sight visibility requirements of the CYMe. 6. Lighting: a. Al1light sources along the east and south property line shal1 be shielded in such manner that the lights are directly away from streets and adjoining properties. Lighting fixtures shal1 be integrated with the building architecture. The intensity ofthe lights along the south and east property line shal1 not exceed 0.5 foot-candles per sq. ft. 4 '~\f?- -t- , .: :.4T1~ c{-f.M c_ AJT 7 -- P I ann n g & Building Planning Division ! Department Development Processing efTY OF CHUIA VISTA APPLICATION APPENDIX B Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters that will require discretionary action by the Council, Planning Commission and all other officiai bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chuia Vista eiection must be filed. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, materiai suppiier. LOUIs -s- PI\cl/Lse/t) V;,n.""/ It!. VOklsbAC.h Y(.,Q 5Pr\K}tr"Y<d ' <:;A,..).. :z. 2, If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals with a $2000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) entity. /--au.., :s-: ((",u(se;J . ~n.,,- IJ. DO,v,ShAcJ." 3. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. 4. Please identify every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. (JAvl Kve,sTefL 5. Has any person* associated with this contract had any financial dealings with an official** of the City of Chuia Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months. Yes_ No ------ 'i-. If Yes, briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official** may have in this contract. . - 6. Have you made a contribution aHffore~ $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council? No.c: Yes..d'ff yes, which Council member? 276 Fourth Avenue:: Cn\..l;3. \/ista Cali,"or"ia l11 ~ "18 (oiS; 6S1-3lG~ ~Irc. --r- . p I ann n g & Building Planning Division Department Development Processing CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPLICATION APPENDIX B Disclosure Statement - Page 2 7. Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official*' of the City of Chula Vista in the past twelve (12) months? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc.) Yes_ No ~ If Yes, which official*' and what was the nature of item provided? Date: f'.--~?~o,y w~~/~ gnature f ontractor pica ;/eM,\" 4JtJ'!)'NfI'~ U1ft Print or type name of Contractor/Applicant * Person is defined as: any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fratemal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, district, or other political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit. Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, Council member, Planning Commissioner, Member of a board, commission, or committee of the City, employee, Of staff members. ** ,- - - .:::.. c :-:J:J -:,-, ";":En:.;:: rc.. " \ .,," C,,-' ;:~:-. i~ - '- '" ,0 , ~ ..., --,.,. c':: . -.;) , ~ .