HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Rpts. 2005/02/09
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Chula Vista, California
6:00 p.m.
Wednesday, February 9, 2005
Public Services Building
Council Chambers
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA
CALL TO ORDER: Cortes_ Felber_ O'Neill_ Hom
Madrid_ Hall
ROLL CALL/MOTIONS TO EXCUSE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE and MOMENT OF SILENCE
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
November 10, 2004
January 10, 2005
January 12, 2005
January 26, 2005
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Opportunity for members of the public to speak to the Planning Commission
on any subject matter within the Commission's jurisdiction but not an item on
today's agenda, Each speaker's presentation may not exceed three minutes,
1. PUBLIC HEARING:
PCM 04-16; Consideration of an amendment to the
Eastlake Business Center 1\ Sectional Planning
Area (SPA) plan, Planned Community District
Regulations, Design Guidelines and associated
regulatory documents. - The Eastlake Company
LLC.
Staff recommends that public hearing be continued to an unspecified date,
Planning Commission
- 2 -
February 9, 2005
2. PUBLIC HEARING:
PCS 05-03; Consideration of a Tentative
Subdivision Map to convert 202 apartment units at
750 E. Naples Court into individual ownership
condominiums. - Schoepflin Investment Company I
Sunbow Corporation
Staff recommends that public hearing be opened and continued to February 23,2005,
3. PUBLIC HEARING:
ZAV 05-13; Consideration of a Zone Variance
application requesting to waive the two-car garage
requirement for an addition greater than 50% of the
existing dwelling unit floor area. - Marisa Rascon.
Project Manager: Lynette Tessitore-Lopez, Associate
Planner
BUSINESS:
DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), requests
individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a
City meeting, activity, or service, request such accommodations at least forty-eight hours in
advance for meetings, and five days for scheduled services and activities, Please contact
Diana Vargas for specific information at (619) 691-5101 or Telecommunications Devices for
the Deaf (TDD) at 585-5647, California Relay Service is also available for the hearing
impaired,
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT
Item: ~
Meeting Date: 02109/2005
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: Variance Request ZA V -05-13, to waive the two-car
garage requirement of the R-l, Single-Family Residential Zone,
Applicant: Marisa Rascon,
The applicant has proposed a 644 square foot addition to an existing 917 square foot single-
family residence. The proposed addition exceeds fifty percent of the building's original square
foot, which per CVMC 19,24,190 and 19.22,170 initiates the requirement for a two-car garage,
There is currently no garage on-site,
Per Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 19.14,050 (a) the Zoning Administrator may, at his/her
option, refer any of the matters on which shelhe is authorized to rule and/or issue a pennit to the
Planning Commission for review,
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act and has detennined that the project qualifies for a
Class 1 (existing facilities) categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA
Guidelines, Thus, no further environmental review is necessary,
RECOMMENDATION:
That based upon the findings of fact, that the Planning Commission deny the request for a
variance !Tom the two-car garage requirement of the R-I, Single-Family Residential Zone,
DISCUSSION:
1, Site Characteristics
The subject property currently consists of a 917 square foot, 2 bedroom 1 bath, single-fan1ily
residence, The property is a relatively flat parcel with no extraordinary topographical conditions
and a IS foot means of access to the rear of the parcel along the westerly side ,of the parcel. The
property is located west of First Avenue and east of Second Avenue between Madrona and "H"
Street in a single-family residential zone where the houses predominately have two-car garages,
2, General Plan, Zoning and Land Use
The project is located in the R-l - Single-Family Residential Zone, and has a General Plan Land
Use Designation of Residential Low Medium (3-6 dwelling units per gross acre). The R-l Zone
stipulates all dwelling units shall have a two-car garage constructed on the same lot, as a
necessary and essential accessory building to the residential use of said lot The request for a
variance is for relief from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
General Plan
Site:
North.
South.
East:
Zoning
Residential, Low-Medium
Residential, Low-Medium
Residential, Low-Medium
Residential, Low-Medium
Current Land Use
R-l Single-family residential
R-l Single-family residential
R-l Single-family residential
R-l Single-family residential
ZA Notice of Decision - ZA V -05,13
Page 2
West:
Residential, Low-Medium R-I
Single-family residential
3, Proposal
The need for the construction of a two-car garage is the result of the owner's intent to add on
more than fifty percent of the existing square footage, A legal non-conforming situation already
exists on the site in that the previous garage was converted to a bedroom in 1952, It is the
applicant's position that the addition of a garage is not necessary as she has sufficient space to
park on-site and that it is her preference not to have a garage, However, the applicant discussed
with staff the possibility of constructing the addition with the understanding that she would build
a garage in the future, Unfortunately, the City does not have a mechanism in place in which to
defer such requirements,
ANALYSIS:
Though the Zoning Administrator understands the applicant's position, this particular situation
does not warrant a deviation from the development standards of the R-I Zone. Staff has found
that there is a general concern with parking within the City especially in single family residential
zones, As development increases on the west side of Chula Vista it has become more crucial that
development meet the objectives of the General Plan "to ensure that development meets or
exceeds a standard of high quality planning and design,"
DEVELOPMENT STANDi ALLOWABLE
PROPOSED
20,8%'
Lot Coverage
Setbacks:
Front 20 ft
Rear 20 ft2
Sides 10/3 ft
Parking Two-car garage
1. 26 % with a 400 square foot garage
2, Per CVMC 19,58,020 (4) a covered patio or detached accessory building (i,e, garage) located in the
rear 30 percent of the lot, or back of the front 70 percent of the lot. can be located either on a property
line or not less than three feet from such line.
40%
24 ft
40 ft
1517.6
NONE
The Zoning Administrator is unable to support the request because it does not meet the four
findings necessary to grant a variance,
Finding 1: That a hardship particular to the property and not created by any act of the
owner exists.
In this case, there is no hardship or special circumstance associated with the
applicant's property, The parcel meets the minimum lot size and dimension
requirements of the underlying zone, and is similar in configuration to surrounding
parcels, The need for a variance has been created by the applicant's proposal to add
more than fifty percent of the original buildings square footage,
Finding 2: That such a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same zoning
ZA Notice of Decision - ZA V -05-13
Page 3
districts and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted would not
constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors.
In this case, surrounding parcels are very similar to the applicant's in tenns of lot
size, dimension, and topography, and generally have two car garages, Granting a
variance from the two-car garage requirement would result in the granting of a
special privilege to the applicant that is not enjoyed by surrounding property
owners, since the variance would allow a single family residence without a garage
in the R-I, Single-Family Residential Zone,
Finding 3: That the authorizing of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to
the adjacent property and will not materially impair the purposes of this
chapter or public interest.
This variance would have a detrimental impact upon surrounding parcels, Allowing
non-confonning uses within the City is detrimental to the orderly development of
the city and adverse to the general welfare of persons and property, The two-car
garage requirement is to provide adequate off-street parking so as to alleviate the
congestion on residential streets and space for the necessary storage of materials in
an enclosure,
Finding 4: That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of
the City or the adopted plan of any government agency.
The granting of this variance would adversely affect the General Plan of the City of
Chula Vista, A variance from the two-car garage requirement would be
incompatible ",ith Goal 3 Objective 11 of the General Plan which calls for
development that "",meets or exceeds a standard of high quality planning and
design," A two-car garage is necessary and essential to the residential character of
a neighborhood by ensuring that open areas remain accessible and visual impacts
are minimized,
Staff infonned the applicant that, in this situation, there was no evidence of a hardship that would
qualify it for a variance, The required two-car garage may be detached and placed in the rear of
the property which would still allow for the proposed addition to be constructed and could be
accomplished without any alteration to the existing residence, In spite of staffs detennination
that this particular situation does not meet the requirements that would qualify for a variance, the
applicant has chosen to apply for a variance, Therefore, per Chula Vista Municipal Code Section
19.14,050, the Zoning Administrator has referred said matter to the Planning Commission for a
decision.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the request for a variance from the two-
car requirement of the R-l Zone based upon the finding of facts of the attached Resolution ZA V-
05-13,
Attachments
1. Application
2. Correspondence
3, Resolution ZAV.05-13
4. Site Photos
J:\Planmng\l'asc Files\.05 (FY 04-05)IZA V\Public Hearing\ZA V-05-] 3 163 G Street'IPlanning Commission Report.doc
ZA Notice of Decision - ZA V -05-13
Page 4
P I ann
n g
&
B u
I d
n g
Department
Planning Division
ClN OF
CHUIA VISTA
APPLICATION · DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING . TYPE A
Part 1
o Conditional Use Permit
D Design Review
~ Variance
o Special Use Permit (redevelopment area only)
o Mise,
Contact Name
Applicant's Interest in Property {If ap~ant is not the owner, the owner's authorization signature at the end of this form is required
to process this request) _ Own 0 Rent 0 Other:
Architect/Agent:
Contact Name:
Primary contact is: ~pplicant
o Architect/ Agent
Address:
Phone:
Email of primary C~!ltact:-WJ'\.e.x-~'1'\~v'\e. f~.. ('~)(... l'l.€..:t--
General Project Description (all types)
Project Name: '~_OO /VI Ai) D i'llO,J Prooosed Use:
General Description of Proposed Project: ttDn p,.c~i2c(lv1S- :f 6.M1-I
~ '1""0 rfLCvlDf; l.\t-tf,- uJ\~G S{M.:E' FctZ
Has this project received pre-application review comments? 0 Yes (Date:)
~Lc.nMS- f.7 8A11-i
:f kUc.4-1'12" 8X1s:nJe-i?
Vii,,: 4- 1--'1. ~ C?,j-( L:r:ae;<J ,
~o
Subject Property Information (oil types)
location/Street Address: \ lp ~ (1 C~
Assessor's Parcel #: I')(otl-! SQ"\ 0- bOTotal Acreage: ,\ '1 dd Redevelopment Area OJ.;;pplicable):
G I PI D' t' r;;' I /'" Z D' , I~ I
enera an eSlgna IOn: ''-.!- '- one eSlgnatlon:
I,' c,'
Planned Community (if applicable): I"
...____7
.5 rl~
,11)'.-,
" ~
/
rg1J' 0
Current Land Use:
Within Montgomery Specific Plan? DYes
Proposed Project (all types)
Type of use proposed: !2(Residential
Landscape Coverage (% of lot):
o Commercial
o Industrial
o Other'
Building Coverage (% of lot):
276 Fou rth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
91910
(6191691.5101
Form 320
RevS.03
Pg1/2
~\~
-1J~
.
P I ann
n g
& Building
Planning Division
Department
Development Processing
ellY OF
CHULA VISTA
APPLICATION APPENDIX B
Disclosure Statement
Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters that will require discretionary action by the Council,
Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial
interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista election must be filed, The foliowing information
must be disclosed.
1, List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subject of the application or the
contract, e,g" owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier.
yY\M2-l~ aA4r 10
2, If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals with
a $2000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) entity,
3, If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person
serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust
4, Please identify every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have
assigned to represent you before the City in this matter,
tA \ C1+AQ. ::::i1J ~
\.<..u So \ 1"'" w :s:
5, Has any person' associated with this contract had any financial dealings with an official" of the City of Chula
Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months, Yes_ No.L
If Yes, briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official*. may have in this contract.
6, Have you made a contribution ~re than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the
Chula Vista City Council? NOZ Y~~~lf yes, which Council member?
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
Y 1 Y 10
(blY)bYl,5101
~I/?-
-'t-
. - -
P I ann
n g
& Building
Planning Division
Department
Development Processing
CITY OF
CHULA VISTA
APPLICATION APPENDIX B
Disclosure Statement - Page 2
7,
Have you prov~'ded ore than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official" of the City of Chula Vista in the
past twelve (1.2 onths? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc,)
Yes_ No":""'-
If Yes, which officia'" and what was the nature of item provided?
Date. 17/0'(0+
~
Signature of C tr ctorlAPplicanti\
rY1~A- t'itsr lr-.J
type name of Contractor/Appiicant
Print or
,
Person is defined as: any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternai
organization, corporation, estafe, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, district, or other
political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit
,.
Official includes, but is not limited to. Mayor, Council member, Pianning Commissioner, Member of a board,
commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staff members,
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
Y1Y10
IblY) bYl.S10l
Good morning.
As you probably have been informed, I would like to see about having the 2 car garage
requirement waived at least for now. I am a mother of two and we need the space we are
applying for the permit for much more than we need a two car qarage. As I stated in my
previous email, there is plenty of parking in the driveway and along the side of my home.
I can definitely do without the garage as I have plenty of space to park on my property
without it. PLEASE review this situation and let me know if there is anything we can do
to have the permit for the room addition issued in the very near future. I would like to
add a garage in the future, but if I could have the addition built first, my property
would appraise higher and I'd be able to borrow additional funds to build the 2 car garage
if Chula Vista insists I must do so. I greatly appreciate your time and attention to this
matter.
Thank you,
Marisa Rascon
2
r'r ,',' 1/,-:,,' /- ,;) /,' /
November 19,2004
Ms, Marisa Rascon
163 G Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RE: Request to Waive Two Car Garage Requirement for Room Addition; B04-356l Denial
Dear Ms, Rascon:
Your request to waive the requirement for a two-car garage for an addition exceeding 50% of the
original building size has been reviewed by the Planning Division, The relevant, applicable
provision of the Zoning Ordinance that apply to your case can be found in Section 19,22.170
Building additions and remodeling, which states:
A Additions, Greater than 50 Percent If an addition to a legal existing dwelling
unit constitutes an increase of 50 percent or more of the floor area of the original
building's square footage, the existing building, including the addition, shall
comply with current zoning code standards, except for the current building
setback standards which would only apply to the addition,
Since your request under building permit number BOl-356l was for an addition to your house
that exceeds 50 percent of the original structures square footage, the requirement for a two-car
garage becomes applicable, The requirement for a two-car garage is found in Section 19,62,170
- Residential Parking - Two-car garage requirement - Intent and purpose, which states:
It is the intent of this section and CVMC 19,62,189 and 19,62.190 to require that
all dwelling units in the A, R-E, R-l and R-2 zones as well as single-family and
two-family developments in the P-C zone shall have constructed on the same lot,
as a necessary and essential accessory building to the residential use of said lot, a
two-car enclosed garage containing a minimum of 400 square feet and minimum
dimension of 20 feet The purpose of said requirement is to provide adequate off-
street parking so as to alleviate the congestion on residential streets and space for
the necessary storage of materials in an enclosure, The enclosed garage is
necessary to protect the general welfare of residential areas by preventing the
establishment of parking spaces in an open parking lot situation inappropriate to
residential development and the open and disorderly display of gardening
equipment, tools, boxes and other materials which would be stored in enclosures
to avoid an unsightly appearance,
Please note that there are no provisions in the above citations for waiver of the parking
requirement This could only be achieved through the approval of a variance that showed a
;.<~r...." /j,/i:--i.'_.',.-L .;) -,1.:.:/;
Rascon Letter
November 19,2004
Page No, 2
hard~hip related to the lay of the land, the property lines, slope, or such matters, Financial
hardship is not one of the criteria for approving a variance,
I apologize for taking so long to respond to you request, but I was hoping to find some kind of
loophole that under which your application could be legal1y approved, but could find none, If
you have any questions, please contact me at (619) 476-5335 or e-mail me at mmil1erla1ci,chula-
vista,ca,us at your earliest convenience,
Sincerely,
Martin Miller
Senior Planner
Cc: Luis Hernandez, Development Planning Manager
Caroline Young, Senior Planning Technician
Carolyn Dakan, Plans Examiner
,') II / ,,-1.-) _?, ,~--;:.
/-:?j:l)fi0/1' : ~,
Nov 18 04 10:55a
x
619-'100-0000
p, 1
Marisa Rascon
, 163 "G" Street
Chula VistaCA 91910
URGENT
November 18, 2004
To: Me. Martin Miller
Fax: (619) 409-5861
Re: Permit for addition & waiver for 2 car garage requirement
I received your message tbis morning, Please let me know who the appropriate person
for media contact is in your office, I must pursue this waiver and permit as my children
and I need the living space far more than we need a garage, My cars are able to be
parked on my property as is, We do not have a parking issue and I am not using anybody
else's space to park my car,
As you know I have been waiting patiently for quite some time now, Please let me know
the contact person at your earliest convenience so I can move forward with the media,
Thank you again for your time,
Ma-v~'R~
(619)571-9496
wherzmine@cox,net
!' ~,.
1 f I 11
," I ' j, " ~
. --. " ,.........,,-; ,:
,t---='i", :"!/i~ I) ,
RESOLUTION NO, ZAV-05-13
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION TO DENY A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE, ZAV-05-13,
TO WAIVE THE TWO-CAR GARAGE REQUIREMENT OF THE R-l,
SINGLE-F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL ZONE,
WHEREAS, on January 12,2005 a duly verified application for a variance was
filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning Division by Marisa Rascon; and
WHEREAS, the lot currently consists of single-family residence without a
garage; and
WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 19.24.190 and 19,22.170
states that additions to legal existing dwelling units that constitute an increase of fifty
percent or more of the floor area of the original building's square foot, the existing
building, including the addition, shall comply with the current zoning code standards; and
WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 19,62.180 requires that all
dwelling units in the R-I Zone shall have constructed on the same lot, a two-car enclosed
garage containing a minimum of 400 square feet and minimum dimension of20 feet; and
WHEREAS, a non-confonning situation already exists due to the absence of
any garage on the site; and
WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 19,64,050 a nonconforming
use shall not be enlarged, extended or reconstructed, substituted or structurally altered,
except in conformity with the order of a duly constituted authority, unless the use is
changed to a use permitted in the zone in which such building or premises is located; and
WHEREAS, per Chula Vista Code Section 19,14,050 the Zoning Administrator
referred said matter to the Planning Commission for a decision; and
WHEREAS, The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the
proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has
determined that the project qualifies for a Class I (existing facilities) categorical
exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines, Thus, no further
environmental review is necessary; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said
request for a variance and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by
its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property
owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10
days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
February 9, 2005 at 6:00 p,m, in Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, after considering all reports, evidence, and testimony present at
said public hearing with respect to the variance application, the Planning Commission
voted to deny the variance application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does
hereby deny ZA V-OS-13 in accordance with the findings of this Resolution,
1 , That a hardship particular to the property and not created by any act of the owner
exists. Said hardship may include practical difficulties in developing for the needs
of the owner consistent with the regulations of the zone; but in this context,
personal, family, or financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits, and neighboring
violations are not hardships justifying a variance. Further, a previous variance can
never have set a precedent, for each case must be considered only on its individual
merits.
There is no hardship or special circumstance associated with the applicant's property,
The parcel meets the minimum lot size and dimension requirements of the underlying
zone, and is similar in configuration to surrounding parcels, The need for a variance has
been created by the applicant's proposal to add more than fifty percent of the original
buildings square footage, The proposed lot does have ample access and room in an
appropriate location for the required garage to be provided, The applicant's preference
not to provide the two-car garage does not alleviate the owner from conforming to the
regulations of the zone as the two-car garage can be detached and can be oriented to
allow for the proposed addition with little if any impact to the existing single family
residence,
2, That such a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights possessed by other properties in the same zoning districts and in the
same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted would not constitute a special privilege
of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors.
The variance request is not necessary for the enjoyment of substantial property rights
enjoyed by surrounding properties, Surrounding parcels are very similar to the applicant's
in terms of lot size, dimension, and topography, and generally have two car garages,
Granting a variance from the two-car garage requirement would result in the granting of a
special privilege to the applicant that is not enjoyed by surrounding property owners,
since the variance would allow an expansion of a single family residence without a
garage in the R-l, Single-Family Residential Zone,
3, That the authorizing of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to the
adjacent property and will not materially impair the purposes of this chapter or
public interest.
The variance would have a detrimental impact upon surrounding parcels, Allowing non-
conforming uses within the City is detrimental to the orderly development of the city and
adverse to the general welfare of persons and property, The two-car garage requirement
is to provide adequate off-street parking so as to alleviate the congestion on residential
streets and space for the necessary storage of materials in an enclosure, An enclosed two-
car garage is necessary to protect the general welfare of surrounding parcels by
preventing the establishment of parking spaces in an open parking lot situation, which is
inappropriate for residential development, and would prevent the open and disorderly
display of materials and items that would be stored in enclosures to avoid an unsightly
appearance,
4, That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the
City or the adopted plan of any government agency.
The granting of this variance would adversely affect the General Plan of the City of
Chula Vista, A variance from the two-car garage requirement would be incompatible
with Goal 3 Objective II of the General Plan which calls for development that "" ,meets
or exceeds a standard of high quality planning and design," A two-car garage is
necessary and essential to the residential character of a neighborhood by ensuring that
open areas remain accessible and visual impacts are minimized,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Planning Commission of the City of Chula
Vista hereby denies ZA V-05-13,
DENIED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 9th day of February 2005, by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES.
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN.
Marco Polo Cortes, Chair
ATTEST:
Diana Vargas, Secretary
J'\Planning\Case Files\-05 (FY 04-05)\ZA V\Public Hearing\ZA V-05-13 163 G Street\RESOLUTION.doc
~\f?-
-,-
APPLICATION . DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING . TYPE A
Pa rt 2
CITY OF
CHUlA VISTA
Residential Project Summary
Type of dwelling unit(s):
Dwelling units:
Number of lots:
1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
PROPOSED
g
ff
i
-.l.-
EXISTING
.>>-
~
--er
\
3 + Bedroom
TOTAL
Density (DU/acre):
Maximum building height:
Minimum lot size:
Average lot size:
Parking Spaces: -4-
1 1:" I? (, "/~!' -j
Required by code:~--'-" 1...L~ !/r:;;>'Provided:
Type of parking (i,e. size; w~ther covered, etc.):
Open space description (acres each of private, common, and landscaping):
Non-Residential Project Summary
Gross floor area: Proposed:
Hours of operation (days & hours):
Anticipated number of employees:
Number and ages of students/children (if applicable):
Porking Spoces:
Required by code: Provided:
Type of parking (i.e. size; whether covered, etc,):
Existing:
Building Height:
Maximum number of employees at anyone time:
Seating capacity:
Authorization
MA-f-l <;11;- UI- S'r<l',j
~ /
J..3>?kk. --:J
Dote: I:)-/~ / c 1
Print applicant name:
Applicant Signoture: JC\I'\
,
Print owner name': H{.\-/:l &=It !2{\ r- c fr0
Owner Signature,:-.-i}1\ ' 'J=<r-i~ ~<:: .J
Date: I?-f ~<J,I (;\/
*Note: Proof of ownership may be required. Letter of consent may be provided in lieu of signature.
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista
California
91910
(619) 691-5101