The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Comm Rpts./1995/09/27 (5) PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT Item 1 Meeting Date: 9/27/95 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Eastlake Greens Financing Plan SPA Amendment, PCM-95-11 Amendment to the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Public Facilities The Eastlake Greens SPA project consists of approximately 830 Acres, located south of Telegraph Canyon Road, westerly of Hunte Parkway. The future alignment of SR-125 provides the westerly boundary, as the Future Orange Avenue provides the southerly boundary (see locator). The initial SPA plan was approved in 1989, for 2774 dwelling units and assorted other uses, including commercial, schools and parks. A subsequent SPA amendment in 1994 changed the configuration of the southerly portion of the property and increased the unit count to 2861 dwelling units. When the 1994 amendment to the SPA was approved, the Public facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) was not modified to reflect the changes. However, a condition was placed on the Tentative Map requiring that the PFFP be updated prior to approval of any Final Subdivision maps for areas affected by the modification. The Environmental Review Coordinator has conducted an Initial Study, IS-94-19 of possible environmental impacts associated with the project. Based on the attached Initial Study and comments thereon, The Environmental Review Coordinator has concluded that there would be no significant environmental effects and, therefore recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on IS-94-19. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution PCM-95-11 recommending that the City Council approve the project in accordance with the attached draft City Council Resolution. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable DISCUSSION: The Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) is a teclmical document that is supplementary to the SPA documents for a Planned Community, such as Eastlake Greens. As such, approval of the document does not confer any additional entitlements or involve any new concepts. The PFFP provides a comprehensive listing of public facilities to be provided, in part or in entirety, by the project. Major components of the PFFP consist of: Page 2, Item 1 Meeting Date 9/27/95 I. phasing proposed for the project. 2. a listing of facilities proposed with each phase 3. Estimated cost of the facility, or the project's share 4. Alternative methods of financing available. The identified facilities may be offsite, as well as onsite. Examples of offsite facilities might be schools or road improvements. Additionally, the project may only be required to participate on a fair share basis as opposed to the requirement to construct the listed facility. Examples of this might be Mello-Roos districts or payment of Development Impact fees. In 1989, the City Council approved the SPA plan for the Eastlake Greens, including the PFFP. Since that time, the Chula Vista General Plan has been amended to include other major projects, such as Sunbow, Salt Creek Ranch, Kaiser Hospital, Rancho del Rey and the Otay Ranch. Also, many changes have occurred in the City's approach to the planning and provision of facilities. The City has adopted Development Impact Fees for transportation and sewage facilities, including an interim SR-125 fee. The City has established a Growth Management process, and developed legal threshold requirements. In some cases, this has affected the proposed approach to financing these facilities. In 1994, the Eastlake Greens SPA plan was modified to include additional land resulting from a land swap between Eastlake and the Otay Ranch. Among other things, this land swap resulted in realignment of the proposed location of Orange A venue between EastIake and the Otay Ranch. This update to the PFFP reflects reconfiguration of land uses and associated facilities as approved in the 1994 SPA amendment. The current proposed update to the Eastlake Greens PFFP contains many facilities that have already been constructed, primarily in conjunction with the northerly portion of the Greens project. Attachment "4" contains a list summarizing the facilities remaining to be constructed to accommodate the EastIake Greens Project. Facilities on the list generally fall within one of two basic categories of improvements: 1. Improvements necessary to provide access or services to the homes being constructed within the Greens. 2. Improvements of a regional nature which require some measure of participation by the Greens. Attachment "A" contains a column which identifies the category for the remaining facilities (category 1 is labeled "G" for "Greens" and category 2 is "R" for regional requirement. Construction of regional facilities are generally not required for the Greens, unless they are Page 3, Item 1 Meeting Date 9/27/95 necessary to overcome certain threshold deficiencies. Exceptions to this are facilities (generally streets) necessary for access, which also provide regional benefit, such as Hunte Parkway and Eastlake Parkway. Generally, category 2 requirements are met through payment of Development Impact Fees. Portions of Eastlake Parkway, Hunte Parkway and East Orange A venue are in a special category in that they are not required to provide access to the project, but are (at this point) required to be constructed by the project. In the case of Orange Avenue (from Hunte Parkway to the easterly subdivision boundary) and in the case of Hunte Parkway (from South Greensview Drive to East Orange Avenue), these projects were originally required of the Tentative Map in 1989. At that time, major projects were required to construct all major roads within or abutting the project boundaries. With the advent of development impact fees, this would no longer be a requirement, since the cost of the facility will now be paid by collection of fees. Eastlake has chosen to keep the requirements on this project at this time because they anticipate processing another SPA amendment for the Eastlake Greens in the near future, and may require those roads to meet threshold standards. If that turns out not to be necessary, they may request a modification to the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map to remove the requirement to construct those roads. Eastlake Parkway, from the southerly SPA boundary to East Orange Avenue is proposed for inclusion in the PFFP for the same reason. The PFFP also provides updated figures on existing and proposed parks and recreational facilities planned within the Eastlake Greens SPA. It clarifies that the figures are for net useable rather than gross acres and also that the maximum credit for private parks is 50 %, but may be less, subject to review and approval of the Director of Parks and Recreation. There is also a notation that the developer is required to provide 7 additional acres arising from separate development agreements which are not reflected in the figures. A portion of these additional 7 acres will be provided in The Greens and other phases of development (EastLake Ill). Attachments: 1. Locator 2. Planning Commission Recommending Resolution 3. Draft City Council Resolution 4. Exhibits 5. Eastlake Greens Public Facilities Financing Plan 6. Initial Study and Negative Declaration 7. Disclosure Statement (m: \home\planning\pffp. cst) PROJECT LOCATION Lower Otay ReselVoir ATTACHMENT 1 CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR PROJEcr EASTLAKE DESCRIPTION, C) APPLICANT: DEVELOPMENT CO, Miscellaneous: PROJECT Eastlake Greens Request: To amend the EasUaka Greens SPA (Sectional Planning ADDRfSS, Area) and the PFFP (Public Facilities Financing Plan). SCALE, FILE NUMBERo NORTH No Scale PCM - 95 - 11 ATTACHMENT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. PCM-95-11 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-94-19 WHEREAS, The Environmental Review Coordinator has considered Initial Study IS-94-19 and has concluded that there are no significant impacts anticipated from amendment of the Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area Public Facilities Financing Plan; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission has held a Public Hearing and taken testimony; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration IS-94-19 and amend the Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area Public Facilities Financing Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this day of by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: William C. Tuchscher II, Chainnan Nancy Ripley, Secretary (m: \homc\planning\pcm9511.pcr) ATTACHMENT 3 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AND ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-94-l9 WHEREAS, The Environmental Review Coordinator has considered Initial Study IS-94- 19 and has concluded that there are no significant impacts anticipated from amendment of the Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area Public Facilities Financing Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a Public Hearing on September 27, 1995 and voted to recommend that the City Council approve the amendment of the Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area Public Facilities Financing Plan; and WHEREAS, The City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said amendment and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose was given by it publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 1000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m., October 10, 1995, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was closed; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby adopts the Negative Declaration IS-94-19 and approves the amendment of the Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area Public Facilities Financing Plan. Presented by Approved as to form by Robert A. Leiter Director of Planning Bruce M. Boogaard City Attorney (m:\home\planning\pcm9511.ccr) ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBITS c C III E GI 0:: J!I u GI o ... 11. c:: 'u c:: .. c:: ii: .... o .., o ~ - '" .., I:: o aJ I:: o ~ .~ :c au.. roO Qj m I:: 3: ., ., <.?en :;; I:: .2 ro ii5 a. E ::J D.. J~ 'C " UI CI> o ~ ., 3: .,.., en I:: ., 0 "" >- "'E ~-c ~ ffi . >- ~~ '0 ro ~> '" >- oJ)J 1::0 ,Q 0 15::: - ., en 3: a.., Een ::J ~ D.. '" w:g 3: '" "en en_ ., 0 '" ::J ",b ~ ~ o 0 Eo I <.?D:: ;UI o c:: Z CI> .CI> . ~ 2<.? D.. . Z "'", &JeD ... CI> '" Uloo ~eD D.. uu ';:: "I:: t)t) is is '" ., ., u.. "" ~ '" D.. cc ., ., E E '" '" '" '" ., ., '" '" '" '" ~ ~ c u.. u.. 0 aa~ I:: I:: X OoW ~ ~ c: m ~ t.Q Q) 0 0 .~ LL a.a.> ~~~:c m~~.g D..f-f-en COO o ";:: ";:: ~t)t) ~iSiS 'u +J c t ffi Q) '" E E a. '" '" ~ '" '" ., ., ., a. '" '" 0",,,, CD~~5 ~i5i5~ U) c c ~ ~ 0 0 W a.:.;:::; :.;:: c rJ)~~.Q :R 0 0 .!:a LL g- g-.~ ~c::c:"C m~~.g D..f-f-en I:: I:: o 0 :.;:::; :.;:::; o 0 '" '" x x WW I:: I:: o 0 '00 '00 :~ :~ .., .., .c .c ::J ::J en en ~ ~ o 'm I- :2 0 '2'0) ~ 1:) .~ c: co ~ ~; -g "8 Q) - 5 ~ ffi <V .Q ~ _'" -> <(co :!-<( a.."O ~ ...:~'2' enS ;: Oco ~B Q) ~ '0 I... 'S; 3:0~ m<e (l)ro Q) (I) c.. c: --000 men Q)~ ~mO ?::>, ~ c: W Q) O"'i:: C!).9 Q) 0 c: +-" Q) Q) w.......J2 ~1i5 0015 (5"':N ~Q) c: c-:-~a.;:c:.92 ~ ~ ~ ro ~ .9 .Q c5 :tU. +-,.s:~a..C:fen!9 - Q) rJ) a.. Q) ~ ~ ...: fJJ c: Q) ro I =,0 ::]0>_> _a.c.o~ o Q) C:.- Q) (l) E..c > ..c ,'n. :J a. > ... :J ..c Q) '7 ..c u :::r: - <( c: a.. ~ ':;: a..~cri.9,,?Q):fI...O~ ~"-' .....: a.. ~ - Q) E CD ~EEo ."," 3: o!'! >U 0 0 ~.... > Q) I- 0..':::':::;:000<((1)-(9 "8 ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (5 ~ .,g~~~!::wffi<(oo I... a.. a.. Q) Q) _ I..... Q) -c ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ S 5 ~> t:'~ OJ:J:J ..c"'~~-o 'IDI:r::u:i "5-CwOU5 a. z...............Ow..............+-' Q) g g g en B g g g g > l:;J::;", b", Q) mz.b.bJ::;", o rJ) -c "C 00 rJ) rJ) I.... c: c: c: c: c: c: c: a. 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 .sooo<.?<.?oooo '" , D.. 0,{ ~ '" D.. .., o o ~ o .c .<:: Q) .0; Z ., .., ~ <.? <.? <.?<.?D::<.?<.?D::D::<.?<.?<.? N :g..c m..c.,......cm.a",," m..c ca~RRt--~~~r--:e:e ~ D.. I:: o ~ a. .0 t '" a. "E ., E '" ~ '" ., ., a. '" o '" <Dc::!; > 0 u.. ~~(5 en ~ I:: ..2wo c..1::~ '" 0 '" :E :~ "5 lJ.. .~ g- -c:81:: m :J ~ D..enf- o '2"(ij' o~ """, ., ., = I:: 8.!!! .,..,. 1::- .!!!~ ~~ ., I:: > ::J ~.L:: B ~o '" 0 <( D....,D.. .,,,,en mQj~ .f: ~ Q> a. en .<:: ;;;.sg a.. Q) f/} ~.~ 0 "" ~- m 0 >- D.. 3: '" '" .~ ~ I:: > ~ ., '" '" ., I:: D.. ~ ., ., "~~ .<::<.?'" :; ~ O(f)~ en" Q):JO > ~ :J o en .b ~ I:: '" 0.00 .soo <.?<.?<.? '" ~m.c(() ta~~1'- ~ D.. " 'C t) is oCt t: r;g :J: )( w uu .c :s t) '" is is "E 1: I:: ., ., 0 :t::EE'fl m en en m U5 en en X ., ., ., ~ ~ ~ I:: Q::!;::!; "~ "C"CLLlJ..- 55(5(5~ lJ..LL I:: I::.g rn rn .Q .Q en 1::1::--- .2> "2> ~ ~ L1.. enenooo ooc..c..L... ij:ij:~~Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f-f-f-f-en Q) I:: '5. a. o .<:: en '" N '" a:: I:: o >- I:: '" o >- .c '" I:: 0 o "i' >- '" ffi "C~ 0-0 ~e ..c: m c::: I:: c..O ajl:: 0 m c::: 0 >- t>> I:: ~ ~ I:: ~ g, ., '" rJ ~ I:: tnO ..c: r-ml::..c:Q. 1::0~a.~ O..c:O~tn .11 c.. _ tn Q) m~~lI12 E ~w ~ I:: ~Q).9Q).m o ~ >-= E L... C m I:: .,~ E~ ~.;;; 3: =~m"EQ) m tn Q.. (I.J en I:: .- E ]1 _.2>(f) ~ Q) c: f/} 0 m > ~ OOI.i::+=,om +:;ij:ti;ena.a. ca m L... m E - c.. L... ~ W 0 'u ~ Q)"C - 2 .- = E I:: -'" 1:: S "- Q) rn c !E&~~8 ., Q) I:: '" .<:: e OJ 5 D::D::D::D::D:: UI II> CI> ]i~ ;z:: .u o .. IL. I'-COmON I'- I'- I'- co co en 0) ;F- CD 100 C C 00:> a:~ U1N "r " .- oct. ;Rd: ::> r-, ~ Q) en a: ~ c: LL ID ~ o .. l..~ Q) a3 -6 ..00 ~ CD ~ (')N ~L{)~ N t: ~ '- , ' , , Q)~ ~ .s::. a:d: a:oa: a: ID '-I~'( (J)a: ..... <::.. ~ VJ - c: "i:: S (L lrflrf ~- -NCD M a:s .- x \)~:~ N~ <';J(T)..,.....,...- N .c~ >< .s::. .,..... , C\I a:ci:ci:ci: , W ...... a:d: C') a: 0.... a: ~j ~ ...... () Q) W Q)w 00 Q)oo ::J <D CJ) -a; CJ)~ Q) -a; 0 a:s 0 (J) 0 --Q) '--' ~ a:sio a:sio :::Je 0 .c ra 1"0- (j) Q.. ..c:Q.. ..c:Q.. .......&, '- 0.... 0.... 0.... :::J (L u.. a. . . . . . . . . . II 0 a3 ......- ........ ~ .-...... ........ ....... ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... .... ..... ..... . .;, o LIJ'" ~~ ~Z-~ q:W j~ --'LIJ ~B Ui~ ~l ~(!) W ""I <i> iJ _ se,./;s ~-- . " ~ ~ ATTACHMENT 5 EASTLAKE GREENS PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN EASTLAKE GREENS PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN Strikeout/Redline Draft Text Reffio'(ed/'I!ii~tlgu,oo 1~~~I.i;l~!YI!.$m~.n~I!;~fl~~II;~~II~ill!nt ................................-. -----------.- June 7, 19891!~~~RW~~~~g Prepared by: JAY KNIEP LAND PLANNING (916)-541-1817 g.~lli~Qg;'i;~~;;IR!t!l?;i;;;;lllllil'111t'1I111Irll f(iffl4~t~~~~Q~!fifij!1~$;...................'.'....'...... ..................... . (i{~!3M~!!) CITY OF CHULA VISTA PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN -EASTLAKE GREENS- TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER Page 1. Introduction A. Background and Regulatory Context. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I B. Purpose .................................2 C. Key Assumptions ........................... 3 D. Consistency............................... 7 E. Regulation of Development .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 ll. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Requirements for Future Development A. IIIYootory of Needed Facilities .................. 10 B. Summary of Projects of I3astLake Creells ........... 30 C. EastLake Greens Phasing ..................... 44 D. Summary of Costs to Buildout .................. 47 ill. Public Facilities Phasing and Requirements for Development A. EastLake Greens Project Phasing ................ 48 B. Phasing Program for Regional Tftlftspeftfttiell Facilities ..................... 49 ~;IRljimgRiilmf~tIJ!il$l!m~:fiI~j~ljIi;j!jIII.fji~II"!iijiIljlij49 IV. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Financing A. Overview............................... 53 B. Review of Financing Programs Available and in Place in Plan Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 57 V. Implementation Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 61 (9~?3~?j!~) II TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) APPENDIX A. Bast CiUlla Vista TffiIISj!eFtaaeR PhasiRg PlaJI B. TkresholalStftI1dafEls Peliey Datoo Ne'/emeer 17, 1987 FIGURES Pa!!e L Vicinity Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ~;tm~~~~i.!t~;m~~i~iti!~t~ill~\!~!!~.~jt~~!~i~!~ii!.!!~~ TABLES L Improvement Phasing Status ................... 48 2. RegioRaI TraJIsportatioR Faeilities m!Ptl1l,.!i!!~~~150 EXHIBITS A. Circulation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. II B. Domestic Water Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14 C. Reclaimed Water Plan ........................ 16 D. Wastewater Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 18 E. Stormwater Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 21 F. Parks Plan .............................. 25 MAPS L 2. 3. 4. 5. ~M 6V;. 7. ~91!! Greens Oft Site Improvements Phl!:Je 1 ......... Ni)Ht! Greens OR Site Improvements Phase I (cont) ..... ~u1!1 Greens OR Site Improvements-Phase ~ i . . . . . . . . ~utb Greens OR Site Improvements-Phase ~ ~ . . . . . . . . I'~~ii.'~_~~~i_'i~iii~!iiiijjiijj Eastlake Greens Phasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RegioRa! TraJISj!ortatiEIR Facilities ................ 32 33 35 38 40 .111 46 52 (9~WM'I1~) iii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A, BACKGROUND and REGULATORY CONTEXT This Public Facilities Financing Plan ("PFFP") is a required element of the Planned Community District Regulations adopted for the EastLake Planned Community. More specifically, the District Regulations require that a Public Facilities Financing Plan be approved by the City of Chula Vista prior to or concurrent with the adoption of a Sectional Planning Area ("SPA") Plan for an area within the EastLake Planned Community. PrayisioRs of the emft Eastem Temteries TffiflSportatiOR PhasiRg Plan ("TPP") have BeeR iReOFf'emte6 iRte tllis P!lBlie Faeilities FiR81Ieiag Plan se thllt the p\iBlie facilities lIfte iRfrastruet-life reflliirelRCflts far f!lmre ee'/eloplRCflt OORtlliRe6 iR Chapter II lIereiR, life lak-eR iRte eORsieertllioR. Figures I and 2 are a Vicinity Map and a Project Component Map, respectively, illustrating the location of the project in the City of Chula Vista and as part of the Eastern Territories of the City of Chula Vista (that area generally easterly of Interstate 805). On February 19, 1985, a Public Facilities Financing Plan for the initial development phase of the EastLake Planned Community, known as EastLake I, was adopted by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista as an element of the related SPA document. SPA #1 is EastLake 1 <r~i!!~~!i:~ Hills and !t~~tI~ Shores) and SPA #2 is EastLake Greens. This document is intended to address publiCfiidlity needs associated with the EastLake Greens SPA Plan. 1\1111111Irllll_rdlilli1IrAlfl1111111111111 (9~!~HiI~) B. PURPOSE The Public Pacilities FiHllficiHg PlaH is iHteHded to idcntify the vMious pllBlic facilities reqllired to slIpport the planned de'ielopmeAt of EastLakc Greens (SP f. tt2) and to eAsure that these Pllblie facilities are provided at the time they are Aeeded. IA so doiAg, tAe PUB lie Faeilities FiHaAciHg Plan dcsigAates Hot OHly OH site public facility HeedS but also eHdeavors to address regioAaI or area. '.vide impr-ovemeAts by its adoptioH of the faeilities aAd phasiAg provisioAs Ilfid FeqlliremeHts of the East Chllla Vista TraHsportatioA PhasiHg PlaA, Heeded to serve cumlllativc plwmed growth .....ithiH adjaceAt MetiS. Regarding required public facilities, the Public Facility Financing Plan identifies a preliminary cost estimate for each improvement as well as funding sources appropriate for the type of public facility involved. The Public Facilities Financing Plan is intended to be a dynamic and flexible document. The goal of the Financing Plan is to assure adequate levels of service are achieved for all public (Q8f3lP.l~) 2 facilities impacted by the project. It is understood that assumed growth projections and related public facility needs are subject to a number of external factors such as the state of the economy, the City's future land use approval decisions, etc. It is also understood that the funding sources specified herein may change due to financing programs available in the future or requirements of either state or federal law. It is intended that revisions to cost estimates and funding pro- grams be handled as administrative revisions, whereas revisions to the facilities-driven growth phases are to be accomplished through a Public Facilities Financing Plan update process, as set forth n!sm iH the deyel0jJmeHt agreemellt. C, KEY ASSUMPTIONS There are a number of key assumptions implicit to this Public Facilities Financing Plan. The assumptions playa major part in determining public facility needs, the timing of those needs and the staging of growth corresponding to the various facilities. Key land use and phasing assumptions can be summarized as follows: 1. SPY^. #lllHd SPf. #2 are iHitial deyelej'lmellt phases of the 32001. aere EtlstLake PlIumed CommuRi~y to be deyeloped withill the City of Chula Vista. Subjeet to General. PlB.!! Update efferts (engeillg at the time of this writiRg) IIHd future growth mllHttgemeHt eHtitIemellt deeisiens by tlle ..I!riaus jurisdictieHal agellcies illyelyed, the EtlstLake PIRIIlled CommuRity is IIHticipated to be impleffieHtee if! pha3Cs geRerel.ly oollsisteRt with iRfermatioR provided hereiR as AppeHdix f.. This iRformatioR represents fermal iRpHt given to the yarious jurisdictiollal ageneies by Etl3tLake DevelopmeRt Company to faeilitate f-aeility ml!ster plRIIllillg efforts ill terms of !!fell '{{ide aRd/or IOllg term public faeili~y needs. 2. Land IIse alloeatioR and intensity is regulated by beth PlanRed CemllillRity Diatriet Regulatiolls RIId SPA Plan deellmeHts. The CeHereI. De.tel0jJmellt PIRII llfid related SP/. Plan, aeepted by the City ef ChillI! Vista ell_, _lIfid _' respeetiYely, reglllate the deyelepmellt ef the SPf. Plan 1IfeII. (9~{~l!!l~) 3 Del Mar t ~ NO SCALE ~ Rancho Sante Fe + " , Powey\ \ ., I I :+ f '. ~.. \, ~ '" <). EASTLAKE I EASTLAKE GREENS + 1 I +' --{ X, , c o M E VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 WILLDAN/SIMPSON \ I" 11 g) @ ] ~ ._ u ...... ' .c:: g 0"" ~ z EJ "'", 0 ~O> "'~ (/) ",0 ,M Z "'~ .. '" ~ I- >> .. () .... .. X a: a: ~~ W 0.. - W ..., .c_ .. .. .. - 0 (J)e: e:.. W ." W W.. " w a: :.:; ..0 ~ :~ :':;_0 ::.::: Il. <( = .. <( ~~ <(~O <( ...J "'.. ...J ell- ...J>;:'" -I Z a: I- .. I- "It" 1-""",(1) ~ (I) -e: (I) .... (I) .. .. () I- .... <( 0 <( c." <(c.c. <Co.Q.~ W(J)m W(J)(J) W(J)(J)O W Z t5~ Q)e: .~ Q) ee: a.. 0 Q. E o () o z 1.....1 w '..... (!) .....i w .....i ..J 1.....1 I- . . . .1 I' . , . ., . . . .~ .. . . . ~!.... I:::::::! ........' ,........ ~: : : : : : : 1.......1 ~:::::::::::::j ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...........n.. ............... ............... ,.........= --~-- ',' ~'" u/,\\," -: ')!I ~" ,.,.1,>>_- ".....,~ >i'.r.;;., ' , '. ...... '.,;;.."--..... ' -....., ~'<1l...... .:.............: _.._.z.....;.' ,...;V........ ............. ~ ~'........ ...... /.............. .................. .-r......... ,.-" . . " ( ~ ~~~~~~~~~~. ~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~;.;;.- ..~. ~"'f'fK J.. .. ........... ... 0................ .0. ..\1:. .... ........... '0' ............. .,.(~.. ........ /.... .!!? ........... ......... ........ /..... . (I) .0. ... ........... ........,.--' .......... ..... t... > ........... .....~.-"'" ........"C ....... t.... ........... ........ . : : : : : : : : :: 0 :::::::\ r>.:.: : : : : : : .. .. .. .... ........... 0.........).. / ..........: 'j , " " o u i i i L.._.._.. I- Z w UJ! ~~ ~I lni ~~ ~._- ~ l' '0. '" i" ~ o ~ z <( .....J a.. z o - t;: KI - .....J - I- ::> ill I- - C/) -. ~ ~ .O(J)..,.\t)CClO(D\t)<O""MNQ)II'I~""""aoCl)O_""fDC:CO"'O t!:5 1t)""~22caco(J)""~ID(J)~CDfD ~CD~:!.~.:!N"'''''fD''''CO :;; '" EJ . "' ~'" ~- Q.g A;;; ~ '-I~'~ > " 1Ji & ... ~. CD ~t '" .- -'I u ...m C'i"; " - i u u )J Ct) m m '" .,; C':i l~ Q) . '" ,of ..... CD J! I :J B~ 0) Ij ~ LL "liE :!! .P~ iii ,q!! . .~ dn 1& () ~ B II II> i "I i '0' .. d: : ;;t u m .i,...,...oMco-comC")..,.o\t)C")\t)(DmNcccoC")o_MNlI'IlI'Imc:c ~ ~CNN~..~~~~~~~~~~~~~OmNMMmci..m t!.! ... --- .... : . e u c u m ,...,...ccOO..,.,.......II'I....COMco..,.COIt),...mm,...OccccO....Mm_ m.~.M~ci~m~..N~~cimm.~cici~~~Mm~ . --NNN___ ""--(\1---(\1 ----- .... M . . COMCClNO_CCIt)Om_mOOMmm..,._ f mN.mci~M~.MN~~~m.~ci~ ~ __ ..,.-- .... ~oo .. i- 1t)1I'I1I'I1I'I1t)1t)1t)1t)1t)1t)1I'I1I'I1I'I1t)1t)1I'I1I'I1t)1I'I1t)1I'I 11'1 Ccll'lll'lll'l\l)\I)---------....-----------II'I- ~~o6666~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~6~ ,g,g '0 ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ c ~~~ U~~~~~ ~ ~~~_0~oooo~emmmmm ~ c::o~~oooouuuouou:~ m~~c~=~~~~cccmccc~u oO"''''~-o _0 '-0 Q.a.o.a.Q.Q.Q.;).!:: _ Oc ~o ~0W0W0000 &gUWce ~~~iccccccco~ (O-=.&:;; '"&OI'tiiOl=c=====:=O _.......2'.!! 0.;;.;;';;.;; c.c.c.c.c.c.C.Om >~~~wozzzzooooooo~~ :e: JJcccccccccccccccQQQQQQQQQQccQ Ji i 01(01(<01(01(<<<<< < (ij ~~ :;:; .. . C -j . O....C\lt")..,.lt1te.....CDO)O....C\lt")..,.IlH,O.....CCI 'ii CD e ....C\lC')....lt1te.....CClm....................-_........_C\IC\IC\IC\IC\IC\IC\IC\IC\I S ~t. a:a:ri::a:a:ri::a:a:ri::ri::ri::ri::a:ri::a:ti:ri::ci:ri::ri::d:d:d:ti:ci:d:a:a: i c:: . - . "'=> :0::11 C. OJ... '0 .0.1........C\I ....C\lC')..,.:nter-- ~ e . OO'7~'7f':1c?~,,?,j,rh,j,rhchrhch ~ t. a..o..mcna..a..a..a..a..OOOOOOO C o Z , /- wU'1 ~i ~zf~ Swu; L-Wb r-= C=:: < "'(!) ~ ~ D, CONSISTENCY The provisions of the Public Facilities Financing Plan are, to the extent practical, consistent with and reinforce certain other public documents. More specifically, consistency with the following documents has been addressed in the context of this Public Facilities Financing Plan: I. The Public Pllcility Pilumeiflg PIEIfI ada~ted far the initiRi ~hll3e of the EastLake PlElflfled COlRlRlinity, i.e. the EastLllkc I Pliblie Facilities Financing Plan. 2. The EastLRire Greens Ln'iifOnffielHRi IffifJllet Revert, liS eertified by the City of CIUIIII Vista on The Ymolis ffiitigatieH lReaSlireS ~ertftining te ~lIblie faeilities life integrated herein. 3. The City ef Chulll Vista IHlenm De"ele~lRetlt Impaet fee ~fflgfllffi far streets. The Devele~meHt Iffi~lIet Pee (DIF) program is II funaing pragffllR far arteriRi high'uays ana includes the SPA ttl EIfIa SPf. #2 areas, as well as ether develepmeflt areas, wit-!lin t-!le aefined "beHefit" area. 1. The Raneho ael Rey SP f. I Pliblic Faeilities PIIIR ana PiflElfleiflg f.nRiysis liS aaapted b)' the City of Chula Vista in October, 1987. Ifllema! coasisteHcy regar-aiRg ar-ea wiae ~liblic facility treatlReHts EIfIa abliglltiaHs is lIaaressed. 5. The East Chlilll Vista TfflIIsportatioH PhllSiHg PllIR (TPP) , II aaellmeflt retjllinHg the plHtsing ef j3l1blic iHfrastruetllre 'uith grewth in the Eaatem Territeries, is iaceqJeratee herda liS f.~~eaaix A. This Public Faeilities PiflElflciag ~IIIR iHeaqJlifflles tI1e ~hllsiHg ana faeility fC('[lIifelRents aHa lilRitatiaHs af the TPP lIRa inelllaes iflterpret-iYe pravisians te explain the IREIfIHer in '.vhieh the ~f6jeets speeific lIRa area speeifie retjllireffieflts ana limitations u~on the phasiHg of de'ieloplRetlt are aecamplished. 6. ResolutioH No. 13346 af the City CouHcil of the City ef Chlllll Vista adaptiflg thr-esholdlstanaaros IIfltilll gro....'th mElflllgemeflt campoflcflt af the Cefleffil PIIIR is adapted. Applicatiofl of the "moils "tI1reaholcls" cUHefltly establishee is aelffiewledgee by the retjllir-emeflts her-ein that s~eeified pllblie faeilities mllst be "assllree" prior to the commeHccmeHt of t-l1e Hcxt iHcrcmeflt ef tlevelopfficHt. The adapted threshaltls are eOHtaifled hereiH iH f.ppendix D. 7. The "IHtcBm Faeilities PinElfleiflg Agreemeftt" betweeH the City of Chlllll Vista ElfltI the EastLakc De'ielOjJffieflt CompElflY appre'iee Deeelftber 17, 19E5 by Re3ellltiofl No. 12307 ana Exhibit "A" te the IHteBm AgreemeHt lIjJfJf6vee by Resollltiefl Ne. on Mareh 11, 1986. These tleelllReflts pre'iitlee fer interim DevelopmeHt IIR~aet Pees fer EaatLak-e's share of OH anti eff site ~lIblie faeilities iHelllaing streets, SR 125 inteBIR faeility, fire stfttiefl, library, EIfIa parks. 8. The SupplelReHtaJ. Deyelopment Ilftpaet Pee progffilRS. The City is prepanRg II sehedule of fees for 'iariouS ~lIblie faeilities ether than sti'eets. WheH adopted by the City, the fees 'uill be reqlliree frem tlevele~meHt withiH EastLak-e Gr-eeHs. (9~t~Jt~~) 7 2; . fi~tt;tff~1~~t;~C~~S~::t~~F;::~;~r~~:~fit in . the p,oje6ts herein:, 3,. . . ~=~~=t~~i~p~ht;:~~~ft::;~~~~t~:;pi:~ a~:t~6;?~ati~~sistency..with..these 4. Tbe~l\.Ula ViSti\.;GrQ'o'{ih Management Program iricluding the threshold:; staridarqs; as descnbedabovem .SectionA, 5. . Theeity . of Chula Vista Development Impact Fee (DIF) programs. E. REGULATION of DEVELOPMENT As referenced above, this Public Facilities Financing Plan is intended to serve as the basis for reviewing public facility requirements associated with localized development phasing and, thereby, provide a means to insure that public facilities are installed in a timely manner. With this in mind, a series of development "phases", or sequential BHilding permit thresholds, have been keyed to specific public facility improvement projects such that public facility improvement sequence and related funding assurances can be paced with growth within EastLake Greens and the Eastem Territories 9!9~ri'ifil\1YP!Pj!i9t$. For each public facility identified, a certain status of implementation is specified for threshold monitoring purposes. Generally speaking, public facilities located on-site and off-site must be "committed" in the manner specified herein in a particular phase or increment of development prior to building permits being issued iff subsequent phas~. When "Commitment" of required improvements necessitates condemnation of land off-site of EastLake Greens, the obligation to start construction may be waived if improvement plans are finalized for approval, a condemnation proceeding has been initiated and estimated funds for right-of-way acquisition and construction have been deposited with the City in the form of cash, bonds, a letter of credit or other acceptable form of financial guarantee. Obligations to governmental entities other than the City (e.g., school district) will be considered "committed" when the obligation has been satisfied as evidenced in writing from the entity. In some instances, substitution of improvements may be appropriate. Where substitution is ~?~t~~p!~t~,t~~"9t18:lity of Life" thresholds ~~~~ eontaifled in .^.ppcfldix B 9i!9~Nrg.w!9 ~!1~~mP~9~.gf9~~m will be used as the basis for determining the acceptabiiity of such substitution. Substitutions will be initiated only upon written request to the Director of Public Works. (08/31195) 8 Before exceeding cumulative levels of development ef eaeh tffil1i!fJel'tfttieH f~"Jmy threshold ,iimm~, iHehiEliHg the pha:;e threshelds fer iHer-ements ene t-ilre\lgh eleyen ef iiie'fmnsportatien Phasing PIIIH iHe1\1sing ilie phase ilireshe18s shewn in Table 2, the required improvements of the threshold must be committed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The Director of Public Works shall have the ability to select from any of the following options prior to building pennits being issued for a subsequent phase. 1. Improvements must be completed or open to public use, whichever first occurs or, 2. Improvement must be subject to an awarded construction contract by a governmental agency or, 3. Improvement must be committed by an agreement with the City which shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following requirements to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works: a. All discretionary permits must be obtained for construction of the improvement; b. Plans for the construction of the improvement must have all necessary governmental approvals; c. Adequate funds (i.e., letter of credit, cash deposit, or performance bond) must be available such that the City can construct the improvement if either construction has not commenced within 30 days of issuance of a notice to proceed by the Director of Public Works, or construction is not progressing towards completion in a manner considered reasonable to the Director of Public Works. (9~{~g~~) 9 CHAPTER II PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE REOillREMENTS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT This chapter describes the public facilities required to support the development of the EastLake Greens (SPA #2) as well as identifying the public facilities required to support the cumulative development of EastLake an~()therp~()pe~f:sint~f:.E\astem Territories, pursuant to the TFallsportauon Phasing PlaR fi!~~~m!!!j.~~fRIIJI!. A. NEEDED FACILITIES Transoortation Il~llhwg~\lll!ilill~llIliirI1l11'111,~~!~~!~!!~r! projects requIred to supportufiimatedeveiopmenio(sPi\lt2,as weH as adjacent areas, are identified in the Traffic Analysis for EastLake Expansion, dated September 26, 1988, as preparedfor the City of Chula Vista by Willdan Associatesi~j:!I1j~I!!I'~~~Im!i~iil(i !;\~~y.ptRj!:\9~. The Traffic Analysis was performed in the context of Environmental Impact Report preparation and, as a result, identifies measures necessary to mitigate transportation system impacts associated with EastLake Greens and EastLake Trails. The transportation projects necessary to accommodate phased build-out of SPA #2, are of two basic types: 1. Those facilities that provide for circulation within SPA #2 and which primarily benefit the EastLake development. Circulation system components of this type yet to be constructed include collector roads and local residential streets. These improvements will be constructed to the ultimate City standards in accordance with Subdivision Map Act exactions keyed, via tentative tract map conditions, to the recordation of specific subdivision maps. (See Circulation Plan Exhibit A). 2. Those facilities that are necessary for SPA #2 development but which provide area- wide circulation benefits to other easte~ar.e<!~f:velopmentsas\Vell~a~i~el1tifit:<lin the TFaIIsport!!tion Phasing Pll!H If_mm1ii!!g.~p.;~!ftIJ:!fqi~. Circulation system components of this type which are yet to be constructed consist of major and prime arterials as ffieFe speeifieedly cleseribed in thc Circl:llation Eleffient Class in i\ppCftclix ... setting forth thc clcsign slaRt!ftfds aRt! eftj3aeities ef s!lck facilities r~j~iIi.;.;H;!!nl~R*!~f!~~~$~j:!iI?!!~1r1~$~;.'~Y~RM~1. Regarding streets and highways of area-wide benefit, the City Council has recognized the necessity for a Development Impact Fee (DIF) to provide a funding source for road projects of ;~i~~li~;;ilil~iii~~i~~iii;~~~.!~liIIlBII_1~fl (9fflf~li'!1~) 10 '5 ~ :J ~ 0< . , r ~ r ~ ci !! ~ u"" ~ .... -+ ~ o :-t c: ii ;, 10'10 III ~ '... ~ o ~ -, ii ~ :,,110 .. .. , < - c ., if .. :1 ~ jjh d !-o: ~ . ~ : w ~ d I " h" ~; r _ ..!I: .. o ~. =- IE ~I i ~ i ~ ,[ >4; ";, .:! ~ I . j , . :ii ei-I.L a:~ ~ ~~ ~" -. 'I' i I": i; '[,>- !~ . I'! ~j 1/,,_,__ !~ --~.. "b i ,i ii:1 ;. '!Io!- 1: :~:o\ '~\*I'\! ::; ~ ~ ;! " 'Yo ! I ~{ ~ - - ; a ~ o ~ )~ i - ! . E . , - ! . , i ! j , ;: ~~ ~~ .2: !~ " iij i: w [I) ! II 1 I{ r , Ar ~~ <C ~ ( ;. 0 . .,.....~.~ " ,..;? IJ.. ", ~ \' \. \. -__.1. ,.,r-------_ / (' I -----~--i - /' , //' /. /y / /y // /~? --~ ./ --- ~. / , , ,,/, / / >--- // // E-, ~! ~ ;~ '-I1!'!~a \j'S ]t ~. -gj .. .:II <( - ;C .c: x W i I LLI\I1 j;~ ~zf~ S~Ji ~Q:: <( U1(D ~ ~ !:!!g~9!:1~m~~~ii)Mi!!m~m!9m~~i EastLake'sSPA #1 and SPA #2 have been included wlifilniiieareao{benefidoriiieexls!ing miiJID~~!:!Rij DIP. As such, development within the SPA's will be responsible for \V.~pQ!lt!Pfi DIPs (ellffefttly $2,101 per sitlg1e family eeffiefle6 ewelliRg IIRit) to be 113e6 te',:iiffiltheoo3t of eORstruetiRg a tolftl of some $71. 8 mi!lioR iR regioRaI tnmsportatioR faeilities mYml~. The obligation toward DIP program participation can be met in two ways, either by payment of the fees !ij~!f(~ to the City of Chula Vista at the time building permits are pttHed !~~j.!11 or through tile construction of qualified DIP related projects. The former allows construction of required facilities by the City of Chula Vista when sufficient monies have been collected or on a pay-as-you go basis, while the latter allows the developer to construct the facility when needed in exchange for a credit toward DIP obligations. Should a developer's cost to construct a DIP project exceed the developer's fee obligation, reimbursement will be made as future fees are collected by the City. The exact basis for reimbursement may be set by tke a future separate agreement, to be entered into between the City and developer specifying how the developer will be reimbursed by those projects benefitting from the construction of DIP projects but who do not contribute to their completion. Such an agreement will, among other things, specify the maximum amount of DIP credit to be granted, consistent with the method of determining DIP fees and reimbursements due under such calculation, if any. Tile DIP pregram iIas beeR adopted by tile eity OR IIfI iRtenm basis. Tile program is ellrreRtly beif!g IIpllated tEl adllr-ess ehaRges if! the eirelllatioR system as Vlellas eflaRges if! the timif!g !ifill lIegree of fllt-ar-e lIevelopmeftt. It is iRtcRIle6 tilat t-he proIJose6 IIpllate8 program will be adOIJte8 by the eity iR the ReftI' f-atllfe. Speeial atteRtioR is beitlg giveR to those streets (pr-ojeets 50, 51 111111 52) that life iR !he Ce\:lf!t). of San Diego for .....hieh RO DIP fees ar-e beiRg eelleeted-frem lIeveloIJers '.vithif! t-he CO\:lf!ty. 18!:1luPfimm~;,~~~oonir;mm.~pQ!lt!Pfi~Jfi;m~~I~~~mRUII1~~JfiiElt9 n9il1l~~I~'I.i~ii!iq~~~it~g~ii-!it;gi~!m~l.mI~I~~;~mi \V.).ij~..~...}........'..~9~.t!1gr.~n. ~P. r.gjj;$t......................m!:!!g~g!:1~.......... j.nt!!.!~. P......~.............. 1.}~gii!!Ii~. jj.!.mil.Yim~ t~~~~liI~~m~~m~RjijM~~PI!.~~ls~~~mi;.. .... .. ............. ...... .. . .... .... ...... .. .... .. SPA #2, will be required to participate in two levels of traffic signal improvements. The traffic signals planned within the boundaries of SPA #2, are considered the sole benefit of SPA #2. The new traffic generated by the development will also have an impact on the need for citywide signals and signal upgrades. All development within the SPA #2 areas would also be liable for payment of the current Traffic Signal Pee in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Water Both SPA #1 and SPA #2 are located within the boundaries of the Otay Water District (OWD), which is responsible for providing local water service. OWD receives its water for the San Diego Water Authority via the second San Diego Aqueduct. Although described here for information, the manner in which EastLake will ensure the adequacy of potable water from OWD shall be the subject of separate agreements between (9~fM!!!~) 12 ;i_i~,pt~;i;lil.~~.1111~1_.lil1li~!i!i!i:I$!~:lIY:fi This provision of the Public Facilities Financing Plan sets forth the anticipated means by which water service will be ensured for the EastLake I and Greens projects. The area is currently served by II ~~~~!j~!I~ 5 million gallon reservoir~ and pump station, (EastLake Pump Station) eaRSH1tetea ift aeeereftflee y,'it-h the ElwtLak-e I Ptlblie Paeilities Fiftftfleing Plftfl. The backbone waterlines constructed within the service area were oversized to meet future water requirements and have the capacity to serve the SPA #2 development. Based on an analysis of existing and proposedco?di~??~:~~~f?ll?~~?~~~pplemental water system improvements have been recommended jml'!Aj.!tfff~j;l!}ij!#1~~!nR~!;~~: L Increase the pumping capacityof the Central Area Pump Station ~if~~!~~l from ~,OOO GPM to 9~,OOO GPM.~ ................ ......... 2. Add 2 million gallons of storage capacity at the ID 22-1 Reservoir site located within SPA #2 boundaries.f 3. Add a 4,000 GPM pump to the existing 980-zone pump station. 4. Install various transmission and distribution mains in accordance with IlH !tj3l'ffiYOO ~i;i!1iff;mt~~~ Master Plan. OWD Improvement District 22 (ID 22) has installed a number of improvements to provide water for SPA #1 and #2 development. These include ajj'.tQI!~I~!lM 3 million gallon reservoir to serve the 71~fI' pressure zone and II mlI!9 5 million gallon reservoir~ to serve the 980' pressure zone. OWD ffl also !!baHt te complet~ an 8 million gallon reservoir to serve the areas to the west (Bonita Long Canyon and Rancho del Rey). OWD has reqHe~ted that MUg~~ EastUlke ~!t~$ _ to ID 22.N In addition to the existing ID 22 improvements, improvements required in conjunction with the recently formed Improvement District 27 (ID 27) will also need to be funded. ID 27 will iftitially includ~ the developments of Rancho del Rey, EastLake and Rancho del Sur (~w!Q9W). Aft ID 27 Master Plan !!I.n is bciftg prepared by OWD to determine required faciIities,cosi, and financing mechanisms. The most significant facility that will need to be provided is a terminal storage reservoir which will provide w:riIDi'iill fiye lIays storage to meet ~ demand$ reEjtlired rese>ves far tit the participating developments within the ID 27 boundaries. A eeRtrOOt _&hi;ii;iLii~~i~7eifta ;:H!:~Hr~.~:~~ '!!~!!"~:mlIllli OViD will Feqtlire ElwtLake ta enter ift!6 IlH RgFeemeftt ",vhieh aelifteates the ID 27 faeilities to be eaftstrtletoo, eaeh ee...elsl'er's east re3poHsibilities, ftfle fiHlHleing methees ts be tltilizool'flsr to reeeraaticjft ef a first flAal m!tj3 'uithift the SPA #2 lIfea. This RgFeemeftt may alse plaee limits eft the fttlmber sf IHiilcliRg permits that ean be isslled prier to eertaiH facilities withiH the ID 27 (!.1~i:!\!i:~~) 13 . LEGEND EXIST, SOUTH GREENS PHASE 1 -.-.- SOUTH GREENS PHASE 2 _ _ _ _ SOUTH GREENS PHASE 3 ......... DOMESTIC WATER PLAN EXHIBIT B RlCK~CCMPANY district BciAg iR place Imd opcratiOll!u. +.i~. c........ :0.... oo..............~.W. MY......... i..........!rn.........~.............tW.Jd..........~. i.ju.......P. '!J.P. Y. ~m..........~. .mI~ig... i;.py.mp...........$.Ja.... )1. :.9P,. P....~..~. ep;~it~!c........;.).........~. 9.........$erv....................~...... gjj.X~. }.................. ......................................................................'................tt......................................................................................................... ...... i~ittl;l~ilili~TlfI.llitlilif,lri,I~L~lilii)"illl j?~t!11t1~ey~ml~~!~iS~{~!~gic~I~g$~~~A~prByf~~~~A~i~~~~J:l.ii1!.~i~~!jWs~ .H!)i~r~~M9P~~S~P~~!1~!~ete!!jl!11m~iil~f\).P!Pgt9~~rM!I~~!~rt~~~!~;i. ~S9!!~!f!!9~g~~p!W!'9rl~~~t!mprey~m!mffi~~~H~QR!!j~~!!~~~yi%~p~~~~Fgenf%1 Wii-~f~~~~); . . .. .... . ..... . . ... .. . . ...... . . .. . . ... ... ... . . .. . ... . Reclaimed Water Reclaimed water is available for irrigation purposes from the Otay Water District's Ra1nlj::\M; %)-!~p~ij~~t~B~Y9t!pgiffl~BHi~ym~B~~f'J Jamacila Wastewater Reelamatiofl PlaRt.Th.ese facilities are currently capable of producing IlfJproximatcly onel;? million gallons of reclaimed water per day at a secoRdary level. lR order to meet Title 22 requiremeRts, tile treatmeRt plaflt will fleet! to be upgraded. f.R e','aluatioR of tile trcatmeRt plaRt has beeR performed aAd, sllBjeet to OWD Board approval, tile plant may be upgraded to 1.3 MOD to meetjf!g tile Title 22 requirements. At present, Otay Water District is providing apP~Q~im~~~'Y small amouRt %5Q al.1t~tflt of reclaimed water pcfy~ to SDG&E's Migud SlIBS!!J.tioR fer irrigation purposes. The proposed reclaimed water distribution system within the SPA #2 area is shown on Exhibit C,.. ..*9.~....%i!itiml.>>!~t~%9!~~ipIIBr...B!Rf!!~I~f;~ii...P9ffipi:ng;...~~e~g~i.l1tpiijgi...~t9;)....wi'!...~~ q2!)~~9t~~tQjfgnfqrm~P!A~Lsjftt~P~~~~~~~lR'!iTIi The system backbone has been planned to providereciainied waterforlalldscape irrigation to the EastLake Greens golf course, high school; aOO community park!ffi~~~~9~~' These facilities will utilize the existing production capacity of the ~~I]~ Jamacha Wa3tewater Reelamation PlaRt's 1.3 million gallons per day P!im~S#~8!Y les3 the amouRt alloeatcd for SDG&E use. Additional capacity has been designed into the system to allow expanded reclaimed water irrigation usage should the Otay Water District facilities be expanded to provide additional quantities of reclaimed water. A 20-inch reclaimed water supply line was constructed in phases within SPA #1 (i.e., Lane Avenue) and extends from the terminus located at Telegraph Canyon Road to the Otay Water District Use Area. This pipeline was constructed to provide water fer grading operations and landscape irrigation demands fer the SPA #2 area and other portions of the region. ~atyJ~~~~~~:~~~:f~~;:!~~e~~~~:l~~it:;ei~~:: constructed. These will be included in the local street construction projects. (08/31/95) 15 LEGEND EXIST. SOUTH GREENS PHASE 1 -. - .- SOUTH GREENS PHASE 2 _ _ _ _ SOUTH GREENS PHASE 3......... i RECLAIMED WATER PLAN EXHIBIT C. RIcK D.GINEERIN:; G::MPANY Sewer/Waste Water The City of Chula Vista provides sewage coIlection through City-owned facilities. The sewage is discharged into the City of San Diego Metropolitan Sewage System (METRO) for treatment at the Point Lorna regional plant and disposal through the METRO Ocean Outfall. EastLake SPA #1 and #2 is divided into five separate basins. These basins are (I) Telegraph Canyon; (2) Proctor Valley; (3) Long Canyon; (4) Salt Creek and (S) Poggi Canyon. The majority of EastLake SPA#U#2 will sewer to the Telegraph Canyon basin through the existing City of Chula Vista IS-inch trunk sewer in Telegraph Canyon Road. Additional sub- regional sewage system facilities will be necessary to adequately serve SPA #1 and SPA #2 at buildout. In the context of SPA #1 development to date, off-tract trunk sewer connections have been completed tocoIlection facilities within East "R" Street and Corral Canyon RoadjI~~ I~H~I~~R~!!!l~wII.. These existing facilities are to be utilized to serve the needs of SPA areas within other basins pending phased implementation of additional sub-regional sewer facilities. Existing trunk sewer capacity needs to be closely monitored. Monitoring of the existing IS-inch sewer trunk line in Telegraph Canyon Road will ~~ b~ provided by EastLake through I~~~~ eJleetltic)ft of It sewage monitoring agreement with the City. Prior to the time that existing capacity limitations are reached, the foIlowing public facilities must be implemented: 1. IflsffiJ.l III off site sewer liRe to be 10eftte6 generally lIloflg Preetef V IIl:ley Road to SeNe a POrtiOR of the SPA Itl 8:feIi as well as ot-iler de'/elepmeflt to the flortllwest. ~Install one or more of the following as necessary to serve a portion of the SPA #2 area as well as other future development: a. Install a new trunk sewer parallel to portions of the existing Telegraph Canyon trunk sewer, to provide additional capacity for mmm~ pumping from the Salt Creek and Poggi Canyon basins. ......................... b. Extend a new trunk sewer southerly along Salt Creek to the Otay River Valley and then westerly to the City of Chula Vista's existing collection system. This would gravity sewer to the Salt Creek basin portion of the property but stiIl require pumping of the Poggi Canyon Basin flow. e. CORstruet a water reelamatioR pllillt at lift agreed tlpOfl leeatiofl. This plliftt eOtllE! lumdle 1111 gI'aYity fie',1\" as well as iRterim ptlmj:)iag from floY/S Ie tke Poggi CIiIIYOR basiR. Tke plliftt ',ve\i16 be pkased to klilldle expliftsioR to accommodate atljaeeHt lij')stream develepmeRts wkick life also tribtlwy to the 00sitr. Tke specifie 10eatioR of tke reelamatiofl pllllt IiIId/Of off site truak sewers will be the res tilt of ftlrtker sttldies. (9~f;t~f~~) 17 -- t:,"'S'f LEGEND EXIST. . SOUTH GREENS PHASE 1 -. - .- SOUTH GREENS PHASE 2 - _ __ SOUTH GREENS PHASE 3 ......... PUMP HOUSE G> WASTEiWATER COLLECTION PLAN EXHIBIT D RIcK EN;INE:ERll'K; CCMPANY III tfie ease of sewer facilities serving sub regiollalllee6s, tHe cost of tHe improvements would be sHared .....itH futHre de'/elopmellts t.!Jat 'Nould utilize t.!Je same basill. The planned wastewater collection system for SPA #2 is shown on Exhibit D. Interim pumping to the Telegraph Canyon Basin is proposed for the portions of the project which ultimately drain to the Salt Creek and Poggi Canyon basins. These pump stations will be abandoned or relocated when one or more of the above referenced permanent alternatives is implemented. Prior to tHe reeordation of the final map, all agreemellt betweell tHe City and Ea3tLake Developmeflt CempaR) shall Be eJ(eeHted te farmall)" implemeRt ORe or mare ar the alteratieRs described ifl tHis seetion. Drainal!e SPA #2 will be served by a series of on-site drainage facilities that will serve to collect and convey the storm water runoff. Facilities will be designed to handle peak discharges in accordance with City standards. These facilities consist of a series of surface conveyances, desaj1ting basins, transmission pipelines, and detention basins (temporary and permanent). Storm water runoff will be detained in on-site detention basins and discharged to off-site areas in the Telegraph Canyon, Salt Creek and Poggi Canyon basins. $h~BaldwhiCompany,6Wher (Q8/31/95) 19 !!I[ft~li_II,lllli~!~~!t!~!~!!!!'!~!f!t,~!~~!!~ (9. <~. 1$(t9........~.j ............... . 20 o ~ i ~~ LEGEND EXIST. SOUTH GREENS PHASE 1 _. _._ SOUTH GREENS PHASE 2 _ _ __ SOUTH GREENS PHASE 3 .......... DETENTION' BASIN @ PROPOSED OUTLET -( UNIT 26 CONST. _-.-.-.... __.E.~S1' . 7> f / fi STORM WATER DRAINAGE PLAN .]-/'240/ . .. EXHIBIT E. RICK EN:;INEERW:; cavwANY As an alternative to the construction and maintenance of large basins, improvement of the Telegraph Canyon Channel may !!~ be!\p undertaken through the creation of a drainage district funded by fees collected from all undeveloped properties within the boundaries of the district. Wfleft $~9~ adopted, such fees v.'ilI ee ~~ required from EastLake Greens within the district boundaries. .~..~.~.~. ~. ~t....~..'..'.....I~~r~~~li~IIJ~I~.....PU.'..........ii...........~.{........................ s..... RIJIt.p.....~. P......~........ i.;......'.i9? Q......~.r. ~j~e......... P.....~.....~.;.~.~I..p.. ".' .... .jj" .={t"'."...~.. .""........"'0<......_ ....,."0<,,. . n .n . Salt. "'h"""~' .... "k",;;. ..... .... ."... "'n'" 'tV!S~~1'?t..NYHt9!!%r?flt!i~m':'!Ff*9~t8$fyHyPB'7tNW$P1/,~!!M~!!1!?o~~f\91'Y..tH1 @!iip~lj~~~; . ... ......... .. ... . ... .... . .. ..... . . ... .... .... .... ..... . School Facilities SPA #1 and SPA #2 are both located within the Sweetwater Union High School District and Chula Vista Gity ~~m~~ School District. In December 1986, EastLake Development Company entered into Agreements with the Sweetwater Union High School District and Chula Vista Gity wt~*j'j~ School District authorizing the formation of Community Facilities Districts for the purpose of financing high school, middle school and elementary school capacity to serve the EastLake Community, including SPA #1 and SPA #2. A Community Facilities District under the Mello-Roos legislation is currently in place for financing all school facilities to meet the needs of SPA #1 and SPA #2. In compliance with the December 1986 Agreement between Sweetwater Union High School District and EastLake Development Company, EastLake Development Company has provided to the Sweetwater Union High School District a site for a senior high school of forty-nine gross acres. SPA #2 shall not be subject to the payment of school impact fees for secondary school facilities. (Reference is made to the Agreement between Sweetwater Union High School District and EastLake Development Company dated December 11, 1986 and "Special Tax Consultant Report" dated June 1986 for specifics.) In accordance with the December 1986 Agreement between Chula VistaGity pt~~ School District and EastLake Development Company, EastLake Development Company has agreed to sell to the Chula Vista Gity wt~iP~~ School District four school sites of approximately ten (10) net usable acres each within the entire EastLake development. The purchase price for such property shall be the lesser of twenty percent (20%) of the appraised value of the site or $23,000 per acre, adjusted annually. In September 1988, in partial satisfaction of this Agreement, the Chula Vista Gity!w~~~ School District acquired an elementary school site within the SPA #1 area. A second elementary school site has been pTepOSe6 i!~y!q~ within SPA #2. In additionto the authorization of a special tax and issuance of bonds, the Chula Vista E#yE.l~.g School District has authorized a maximum impact fee of $600 per residential dwelling unit, subject to annual escalation adjustment (f\qtl!1~!y~i~Q), payable at time of building permit. (Reference is made to the Agreement between Chula Vista Gity PJ~iP~!!~ School District and EastLake Development Company dated December 9, 1986 and "Special Consultant Report" dated June 1986 for specifics.) (08/31/95) 22 Parkland Dedication Planned park and recreation uses within SPA #2 include the dedication of a 15.1 acre public community park which includes approximately 1.1 acres of slopes. The other recreational elements, which include three neighborhood parks totaling 1O.:5)? acres, are envisioned to be privately owned and maintained. Also, an II-acre public neighborhood park is proposed adjacent to the elementary school and will be maintained by the City of Chula Vista (oflly 50% eredit will ee givefl f1'Jr aereage I:lfIeer SDG&E etl:3emeflt). In addition to the public community parks and private neighborhood parks, a Community Trail System (1 aeres) will provide a connection between all major focal points within SPA #2 and extend north into SPA #1 and east ~~~~~~1~i!~;~,'iJlII~II~1j~!~(III~RI~rlil~Irt1J11I1 SP'1\t*1i:m; ..... ..... . ... ............. ~ilr1fi~~~j~9p:J);AcijiH~ :erQl~i:i9}}(+}}............................. . t1j.t~ltIl1l~Ifi} P"J.}} lt42I B",3".I R#IL P",5.."'.' Pi1blicCrifuirium'i,j\Piirk*? II!.~.llg~.~.~~~~I - ................... J;~$ 12;9ti}~!l\1!~ 3] 2",;$a~} ~!7i!I.l00iI t~;q;...:I~Q~I ..".."......................................."0....1;;'.... ii!G.} # ..,.m} ?~~i~ ..........................f..() II~j7 I!!.!;~ ttllo/ ttt......'~~.~. ........'.....','.............,.................tt# ~!NR!9^~qQMJW;!I:'I;1i\Pri'\ql#1.T~ fl........ ... If.tciI..r.........~..... ir~if' . ..... ...... ..... .............:beed ~__I~~tili_~I*,I~~?!!~y~!M~!Il!~g~~!!!!B!fgIg.~~!~PRt9Er The Parkland Dedication Ordinance m~) requires approximately ~ tRip acres of improved parkland for !I'i~iYUi EastLake' Greens Ptwl!!j.~~4..!!im!l'i~mrq}il~Hi~~1i. EastLake Greens is proPosing a total of 4G;6~g;~~acresof !i~!~plJbHc and private improved parkland, however, ~U:!;2 acres is intended to consist of three private neighbor- :~ie%~~: t~:~~~~~;~~~i~~~a~ ~~~::c~1111Ir~lg~3f~~:~~:~~~ - (j)~I~H!I.5) 23 Hcigliberheecllififk:iliiidiistlHileiii-i'e SDC&E easemeat, whieh will fllrther re6l1ee EastLake's pllfk total. Parkland InlDrovement The City's Pllfldftlu! Iffiprevemellt Progrtlm sets fufth a st!l1u!lIfd for deterlllillillg t-he fillftlleial obligatioll of EastLake for pllfklftlld impr-evemell!s. Tile total fillftlleial ebligatiell ba~ed lIj'!ell the Ci~'s Pllfk f.eqlli~itioll !I1Id Develeplllent Fees ftIId based UpOIl the mix of hOllsillg types pfOpOSe6 ill the SPA II doeumellt is $5,322,595. The pllfk developmellt poRion is $1,092,450. EastLake is proposing to provide the City with fully improved parks as follows: Community park (~1~j~A~ acres less slope ae~e), neighborhood park (H $j$;A~ acres), 3 private neighborhoOd parks (-1M :~qi*:'fi~ acres at a maximum of 50% credii)iR~ij~.~; for a total of ~ pi;~ acres of !!1~l~improved parkland that may qualify forcrediiiinder the City Ordinance: ................ It shall be required that EastLake provide improvements at or beyond the above specified level as turn key park facilities or pay park fees in lieu thereof. The determination of park improvements, obligations and/or credit by the developer shall be based upon approval of acceptable design and improvement plans for parks by the Director of Parks and Recreation prior to recordation of the final map. The Community Park !~~ ....'ill be started and completed during the initial phase of SPA #2 ~~_~Q'rm;I~~l' It II will ee the responsibility of the developer to prepare a master plan that IS acceptable to the City Council, to grade the site according to that plan, and to install improvements. These improvements weIIld includ~ street improvements, turf and an automatic irrigation system, landscaping, play areas and other amenities required by the PD~. The community park hils beell i~ located adjacent to the high school site to provide the opportunity for joint maintenance byihe City and the Sweetwater Union High School District due to ii;i.ii~tit park and school facilities. ~~m,~t~liPnlX~!!ni[f~IIi!m~I. ~~/~~I~lird~~:ti:~:~~i~i~;~ c~~:ab~i~:,v.;i~iii~iiiiiipiiii, =Fhese easements'i!lj!~~are intended to guarantee the City of Chula Vista that private parks will remain as ~~q1Jl~iP~~p~ 6Pell spaees. Maintenance of the public community park and public neighborhoOd pai'kSwiIibe provided by the City. Maintenance of the golf course and clubhouse facilities will be the responsibility of the operator and will be independent of the Homeowner's Association. Maintenance of private parks and open space areas will be provided by property owners through Homeowner Associations, open space maintenance districts or similar mechanisms. (9~!':~~!':?~) 24 en-(!) ~~ '-a. 8:.C/) ~ a. o ~ < . ~ < d ~ g 1~ ~ ~ ~ i . ~ 1= ; ~ ~ j j 0 LI 0 LI 0 LI ~ ~ ~ 1 . ~ j J I g ~ ! ~-I[1J , \ , \ :. \ j \ I'; --.----..1,1 /^, / , / / , i 1< / /' d'/ , 1f'Y -~?f / , , /'./' /// /./ ,," /~ ~-~=-- , ----- 'I:I'~-;--- -./,~ "~ r....,~.... - ":E ~~ !.. ';:;;I~!~ -e ~ .ct! r, \J.- B~ ~ ~. -g} .:;, LIJ\I1 ~~ ~ZU SLU !~ __LUZ!:_ r=~< U1(!) ;:is ~., LIJ~ ~iJ ~Zn q:LIJLIJ ~~ ..... 0 E tii~ ~- ::5~ ..." .. ~ /4": //;~ppP'O,:\ /,/ ',,", -:'1~ C'" \ \ // ."~ "/'~$;'~ ,\ ~~ ' ~"- ~;~~ :4...~~!'if \, '\ /,~':.~?~:~. o~~ y'-?~~~;/~':' ""~~~...'\ ~'\ Il17" 0 ~;;~~;\ ~<:~~ /..:Jf~~~:' ~7'~Q,. '\~~~~ ~ j' ~ Iljl: ~~" ~~"'__ ~~).'"' 1> '..,.~V'~.~ ' (I!!? ! ),~ d~~") ,:1 ~~~':'~=:~---/~p.~"" ,: ;.'1<.~,_~)~)~ " ~r - \, I~ I', I )~~" ,~~"..f2,tiI" ,,...,,,,.." ',< I )/','v' . \ ~\ l,i!;1'-J I li'ii ~~'" ',I;' )' ,'" ) /':J) ~"f~~'/L_-"~~~.J) \t--' .~~~:. \ \I~Q \\:',\ IL"I ,r~'o':" < -:~_:'f'i~~\,.' n' V:4Ak ~ L~.J '--f;r,~Jff.i] \ I~ ,III '7'~" .~' . , /' "'I :' /~~ ''v\~'' -~ <C. IO;"'~ \"1~) ,11,'", :i,",',)<~I.",.' )~/~' \" 1// )'>~' hr. 1~lta~ ' 1.1 ~ ,'" '11~ ',,) ;;;:; '.,':3-"y '.' ~\,""/" ;~)' /~o,~ ~--/ ~ "~"a~ " '\ . Iii. l" -. _ _' '~~ e. -J I "\ - I rJ '~;?'~1 .,. 'I \'1' ;. J"- 1/".==_~-.J '--, ,\~ · J~' r I /- c_ "".."...,~. \ ~' ,".U .j "J"IIQ~-' '" "" \~, It, / --'--.-~,.'S,~,. _, \\\\ ~ \ "1 c:lt?, . - ) "",~ ,/ F \ ,/- I II I '\'\L,~~~./ ,- , '\1 8);::'::, ''t;~B1t' \ \ "(1 ' ' ", '0 C . ""< ~,-:l@ ; . '\."-:-, ,.. . ,\ \ ) _ : l '1 II I ':;. el'M1 , , '\ \....,\(~' ^' >\ _ I _--..J --:.= ~.,' ~ II I r .-/ ~ -----A(: \~ ~.. \-"'v \\ \\.-) II~/.I ~ I, ,\ \ ..~ _~. \ So\ ;,~~.". S'~\ ,'~~ ", ~~&' " oil' > ' \, \. " \\ 't .,;:,'f21 ' , \1 ::::~'" ",- 'Jia~.. J\, \\ \ \'",\ ,---=--"- 0: ~ 0:./ r...! \~ \ 0 \ ',..&.~ ' P: ) -',-,>, %~\ 'v c \ ~ .~,-:--:'// ' r-., lit. ' , \1\. \ A/ .,,~ ' \Q~' ~'~"'.-.--~~'~, ,\ (;"'/:;;.)--' C iff-'hO~i!/(ftT"~-~~) q\.~ ..,-;.,,~ \ . /', ~__ .\_ ( ,_ ~.. (? (. _! ___ .~".,...v o Q/ ,,~ .\ =- q, \.-.-.. f~' "f '"'\') _~_~/ ' /.t.!~ v r-""'='-~..'\ _ ~ _" --"L-'I .. (- / ( , \ .._7_ ",------- 'y~O ___~l ,) '"'~"'."~ '^, ,C..J ~~" " ! ',..,.....,~~ " n_n_.__ \-; p.:;~?=-~~~ ~"i:1!...."..u."..!fi~:ol!1.~.."."."..~~~~ / __fr .~~.~:;.:: 1~.~~I!JElS~~ ~:' ~SS&I.s~~"'" (" ...., ~" "1"" j:,O / ~" &~\i ~- - ,~.:-.; ~:\O / ~o ~~~ ,. ijO:OOI.......,..!!!!.!..!.!..!."80\5n.:;:;.... !~ ..Q i . \ '.. 0 000 0 ....Qi:JI:J~.:::;"., ~ j \ . ' ~' i""(/(i..... ' \ . ~ ' 'lJoc;;;.......J- _ _ ~' ~ '~ t::IDrriJ-1 _I?~'::::::' e~ -~ r ~~~ ~ '-::::::~~~, ~---. M'li ft ~< .~ - -L.. ""'" ~_ . _._. __ ~__. fl., _____';.;;;:~=.~c,=~~ II .~ "==_.__n_'" .:"~""':."-==.=n~~ c: Cd 0:: Jll. .~ J== .. --~ ;----~- '" ~ o in '" ~ ~ . ~ m 8 '5 " . . ! . Ii . ,.. " . ;< If ~j- : m~ >- ~ ~m - ~ ~i jJ : j ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 tl-@ ~ ~ " c j ~ ~ c . ~ c -! ;; . 11 a. ~ .. '" ~ c :;: i:1 i:1 i:1 C) . ~ ... :is :c >< w . . > . . . < i . . 2 . . < ~ i ~ . . I ! . J , J ! i OJ EJ Street Lil!htinl! and Landscane Maintenance Funding for the maintenance of landscaped street medians, landscaped parkways and supplemental street lighting within public right-of-ways or dedicated maintenance easements will ee i!m borne by the benefitted property owners through the fufmati(lH of a Maintenance District estabilshed under the provisions of the Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 (Division 15, Part 2, Streets and Highway Code). Currently, all of SPA #1 and a portion of SPA #2 are within the boundaries of EastLake Maintenance District No.1, approved and adopted by the City of Chula Vista December 17, 1985~ilijlRt\.~!@!~~1,~~~;lg!l!iM9i..it~. The balance of SPA #2 will be ser\'oo eithefi-iiftJligh the6Jipl!ll3ioH of !mfi!m~'19 EastLak6Maintenance District No. 1 (If tllftJligh the forffilltioR of a sej'!l!fIIte MIli.HteHiliieeDi3inet. A Homeowners Association will ~ b~ formed in EastLake Greens to maintain landscaping located on ~ny~1 common areasl~i~.~Rji!lB9I~BI!RY~imnYiq~_~. Mass Transit The EastLake Planned Community Transportation Plan (1982), based on analysis of proposed land uses, expected travel demands and other characteristics of the area, concluded that public transit demands could best be served through extension of the existing public bus system. Extension of this system should occur as EastLake population growth generates sufficient demands to justify additions to the Chula Vista transit system line haul. ..-:.,-:.:'----'--'-...::'::'...''.'..'.'.:'..:"":..-:-.-.:.c.:::..-',..':..:..:.--..:.-'-.......-...:._:_.:_''..:..:.:.:...--::,.-.:...'.',.'..',........:....:.:--.-:.:::.....:_...,_....:..::.::::.'.:_.:'.,.._:_.'.'.:'..........:.._:..:.._,_.',..'............,__.._.:...'.:',........... Librarv IR August of 19&7, the City apPffl'(OO a Pualie Lief!l!')" Master Plan i6efltifyiRg the Reed f6r sua regioHlIllierary faeilities to ser;'e the HeedS of future resieeflts. AeeoffiiHg to the Master PIIlft, SPA #1 is laeate6 iH the Sweet.oVate!' sHaflfes Ilfte SPA #2 is iHelu600 iH the sliaflfes labeloo Bastem Temtaries "~6IitR". The City's minimlim SIaH€lflf.e for liarary eonskuetioR is 500 S!l.lIflfe feet of lierary Sf'lIee I'ef 1,000 j'!ol'ulo.tioH. Bllsed 1i1"6n populatiofl j'!f6jeetioHs iH these j'!!IHiHiflg sublll'efls, a libra:ry faeiIity iH the ElwtLake II:feIl mil)' reqliire ul" to 35,000 square feet. C6st reSf'oHsieility, lit this j'!aint, hils flat eeeH aeterffiiHed. The City is iHvestigatiHg t-lte imj'!lemefltfttioH of II Develoj'!ffie!lt Iffij'!lIet Pee for fegiofllll sefvieiHg j'!uelie euileiHgs slieh as liefftries. SP t. HI Me fR. will ee subjeet ta sueh a fllture DIP should it ee 1!J'!j'!lioo by the City. (9~f~~\'II~) 27 - As an obligation of SPA #1, a one-acre library site shall be dedicated to the City of Chula Vista if the City determines that a branch library site is appropriate within the EastLake Planned Community area. If needed, the library site would be incorporated within the EastLake Village Center area with the actual site to be determined by the City in the context of subsequent site plan approval processes associated with the project area. Alternative locations within future EastLake SPA's will also be considered. As a further obligation, the Developer wiH.~!!!If!W provide the City of Chula Vista with up to 4,000 square feet within the EastLake Village Center for interim storefront library ~!iI~E~pr9JI~il;The~ee;;~;;:;~idbei3~e~:;d!~tHee~tPtetheCit);7!"~;;eried;:;f . . . . . Fire Protection Fire protection services for SPA #1 and #2 will be provided by the City of Chula Vista. The development of SPA #1 and #2 will require the construction of a 3,500 square foot permanent fire station to serve the local area. The previous Public Facilities Financing Plan for SPA #1 established provisions for the payment of fees for the construction of a fire station to serve EastLake SPA #1 and a portion of SPA #2. eAtife \:IAeevelej'loo area east ef 1 805 16 fifllUlee the eaAstrueaaA lUIe eqllippiAg af 1111 f~lIired faeilities. SPA III lUIa 112 wallla eeAtflellte t-heir share if the Impaet Fee is aaapted. The schedule for constructing and equipping the fire station to service the EastLake SPA #1 areas shall be in accordance with the City's Fire Station Master Plan. ----- - (9~!~1j'g$j 28 Police Protection The City of Chula Vista will increase police service levels as the service area continues to grow. Expansion in the eastern territories has created, however, a need to improve communication facilities. Two specific identified needs include a communications tower or antenna and an improved computer-aided dispatching ~~. ee.j'!aBili~)'. Costs for these are estimated at $24,000 and $530,000, respectively. The Police facilitates will be of overall City benefit and will require City-wide financing. ~~~q~; (9~i'$lj'jl$) 29 B. SUMMARY OF PROJECTS Proiect # 53* 54!!! 55~ EastLake ~~!m Greens Oft Site PhftSe 1 Construct EastLake Parkway as a 4-lane Major between Teleg1'!lfJh CaByeR .yl;~~~ Road and SDG&E transmission easement Construct Reaa "E" I,lj1,1I1!!1:~. as a 4-lane Major between EastLake ~~ii~id R~aa "A" Iql!! i~i~c~ ~~e"2~li!;~!~! Read "E" &tH~1I9,~~Y{\ and Hunte Parkway 56!!! Construct Neighborhood Park #1 (~H~I!!!.19Igjjf) 57!!! Construct EastLake Community Park It I, Phase 1 I!t~~ 58! Construct Reaa "D" !!!~g~~it! as a 4-lane Major between EastLake Parkwa and Read "A" Nfidll YNN ~t~Mi:iiW 59!! ..................-................................,..........."............. Construct ReaEI "E" !41i!l~I~Ji!~! as a 2-lane Collector between ROOd .!'.A-"- !!I~I~~q~~'i and Hunte Parkway 60~ Realign/construct Teleg1'!lfJh CaB)'eR ~jy~ Road to a full ftalf-sec- tion Major between Lane Avenue and Hunte Parkway f~!m~~gj1!M1lIiiI$'t~tI*qml1l1m (9~t?!t~~) 30 Amount Method of Financinl! $ 3,020,000 350,000 2,600,000 Subdivision Exaction/ Future Assessment District Subdivision Exaction/ Future Assessment District Subdivision Exaction 590,000 Development Impact Fee for Parks 2,440,000 Development Impact Fee for Parks 540,000 1,566,000 3,175,000 4"..''''$.17. .5"".1)00". . . '"' .... ';';'.,;"'..:':":': : :::.:::~:.:.;:;::.,::.:.::;:~::.:.:;:::.:::':.;: Subdivision Exaction/ Future Assessment District Subdivision Exaction/ Future Assessment District Subdivision Exaction/ wum~_9Pmmr ..............................--.................... Future Assessment District Proiect No. 61: Construct Neighborhood Park {~rnmf m!;M~Hl1~ii~l~ .................. 62~ Construct EastLake High School, Phase 1 63mm Construct OWD terminal storage reservoir (leefttieR 16 be aeterffiiRed) 63a Increase pumping capacity of EastLake Pump Station from ~~,ooo to 89,000 GPM. 63b~ Add 2 MG capacity at ID 22-1 reservoir site 64$ Construct water reclamation plant, pump station and transmission main connection to OWD reclaimed water system (leefttieR te ee aetermiRed), or 65* Extend new trunk sewer southerly along Salt Creek to Otay River Valley then westerly to existing Chula Vista System 66!!\ Construct Hunte Parkway to a full half seeaeR mam Major between :1~: ,~~i1i~lrlIIBtoad Creem Phft:je 1 au Site 8Hbtetftl EttstLake CreeDS Off Site Phase 1 ~~Im GREENS PII.\SE 1 TOTAL Amount Method of FinanciDl! 1,130,000 Development Impact Fee for Parks 12,209,000 Community Facilities District # I 21,600,000 GeReFal OIJligatieR =flRt~~mmt N! A V General Obligation Bonds N! A V Subdivision Exaction! Assessment District 3,000,000 Subdivision Exaction! Future Assessment District 7,650,720 Subdivision Exaction! FI!t11r-e Assessmeet Distriet $!!iY!!r)?U;1 1,000,000 SooaivisieR EilaeaeR II"'"~II $69,879,729 $ o $60,870,720 59'. '.'.2.7.'..0....'.'.172....0.. . .. .. ". .,.,.",.J{,."...".+",...,.",.,., #',...........,.,.".............,....... , 111~1illiil!.riilll'mti!'g~@~~~~,!1gi;~!.IWJjWf?!~'}1. (9~{~~1~) 31 ~- "~", r--..-.-., ~-::::::--=::......... l. " -,"-. . I /;;__ .....,.......... "', 'J L ----;:=--.:~_.~ - -- ---::-- ,!......'':'-, "',~ .,..r;;--' , "\...- . ~~ _">>,,,- /;--===--::-::"~__""</:'-- I \' t ~':::::-... 'i;':::::::---r--_ --~'_./',--1J [---- ':: '\ I: '~"'~#~ \' ... ..., ' , , \ '-"~ "\ \ r---........} ',r..... " \\ ~' . /'\,\ J. I y//....~, ,':' \ L_ ) ',\ / //=-~ /i /I ~ \ \~- ----------l~---T---.-\--.--- /----~ ):.. ,\ } // ,-----")--/\) r; r_-"", ...1, \ ___....J -' '1- - \ /( " . ,.. \ I r t // ""'v I , , __- ___ -, _ _- ) ,t \ \I\"~.)./ I' '\ 'c?/\'::d ,;, /\ \ ~ " --~- II J ~ '-_1/""\ \\ II /- \ '/C- j-' \ \ "", 1 '\ ~- \\, 'f ", ",_v........../ /-......:..:: J .....' ,:;::-____...._;;,..-, ; \' \ ~ ' \\ ,----- , , 'v \ "- '> ".,.- 1 'jL' '.. I ~ I '/ >V"t..,.. ,'-- --=-"~"'~"'\'" ~_.-1--::: (~~:-.... \ \\ ~\\ II ~ \-i (,'-yf',~(,-" \.~r-"'~-~~- -',::\,\_:yi"~t\ ',; "-/-~:,\ ':\ ~--J/ ' \ ...... ,/-;..1 , 1/" \~. \) \ \ \ ;' II - , ; i(, "''''T ..=::'- \ " ',I. ~ ,~-- -~</ // .r~ \ ;' '---,-, I )). , II ___ -... ,~:--' / \.-li--------~~~=.....1..--~.-T i ___y---("" __>~\'v~ .".// 11 ,~:--- I ( / , ,/ /^''-.. .::< I:J ( . ~/ ~--L 1 1 U , ~/ /r-_~ /-. . )~---- _ /'1' 1 ( i/ ~-_ /7 ,II I , I _ _->;.... -- -;::/ -57~ - ,,/7 ; J ~/(-.:::.==---~~ ,/;:/ 1"1/ !,-.J If II ~.::::;/ Ii :, ---J r-J,\ III " li~....... --"-d.\ / '/ ~, '\.'r=--l/<, \\ !( \il' I l"~:-- ii 53 I ~~~~ , ~ '--~~0 '\ "~~I( ~= -.-.-1...-1 ('~, I II '/ /\ \\ ~ /- 1,1, \', i "~" \'1-' ~</ / '\- ...d.~ \ I I' "'>-,- __->./'/ ..d ~ I il ~'~/ ,--...~~7 >>~\; \ I, \ \ \ 'I """ /Z'.:::r- ~~./ '\ \ !\\ \\ ~-;:-~C:::"- \\ \ 1\\ \\ ~-v""'- \\ \ -'-'~-;i..;:/ \\ " , ~____ h ~,,; ".> ~~-- l:.-4."j "- _') _;:::::..- ---...I '? "-"" i I ! i \ , (!JCi1ti & AsoociaIes a.nC/iIID.o,.......ei5 1/13/88~ EAST LAKE NORTH GREENS ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS MAP 1 WI LLDAN I SIMPSON 1-':: . ~ r--------I -=---- l__ ~; ~- ~~ _~>'\"Q~--=---;;-[~~-=-~;Y="-1,r=--=c-~:\~\, ~ :\:, .~"-,~_-.;, ,-_.. . t---,........-\..': \\ i"" y/ \\----- r-.......... ...., _ I! \ \ '" \' '--,~"\ \ -___. }/'/""-_ -- 'i II II ". ..\ /'....\_\ \ Y/l/'\ ~-,\ i/ _-'-.\,_.__~~ ) \ \ " /y~~, ~/ l.. \.','c-, - ---------,t-~----1- \\ /,- ~ 1:- \. I i ,--")-/',', I., ,..-:"-~..-1' \ ___....JL_L _ _.. ). (( '\ \\~~,j (( \ i:"JV ,{/~i Y \ \ ::"t, --1[-63j.;.'-'~''''=''/-\<\ \\ i,1 ~.. \\ -",':.._1-:/",/ //'--'~'} l " , " _.':.......~-1r a.. \\ \\ y. I \ i, /../ /;{~l I<l>';.::=='-:-'i~'~~;\""'=,j.<r-~ _ \ \\y~" 11 \c,.-, .r,_, //'-_',/ "')"\.J~\o..--:' "~\\\ C''\Y.t\\ '\ . "~\ VI ~0.._/!/ ,-r' \ I /,I. .' \ \....)\./. ", " \ 'I' ......._~ .. ..... /-:;../ '\ /: I \;.- v \\ . I; II ,C, ""'T~1" \ \\ ~ ~ II" / .. ::.' '....-l-... I I L' \~ ~ __ -..... J \.---;~..-,---~~--' -1 )-;;:-/" 63' K II ../~' . ~\\1 /~ '-.. L -':2;_ I;} 1j-,/'~ I /~v ~~-=--::--. ,I--- ---, }.~ //'1:b ~ __it ---.:::::-.= /2--:::::::/-::::;:/621~\f:~\\\ v 91 t! -----)) .~ "f""C',i" i'h~ '\ \\ (! * ':" ;1 II I \ Y; II / 63 \ L..~~~~ L .::~~\ <"~~~,--~65 ___ ----~, .!.Ir--~.i< \ \ II --' /J{l'\.\ )~.o:--- r ! i! ~ "~" \'}~// f, jv \ ! \,,':, \\,! ~'X">;~t:df"~"'yY,\ \ ! " \.\ ' ~'-<!:'~ ~y '\0 \ I 1\ \\ I - -;~ \\. ''L 1'\ \\ ~~ 1\ \ ~' .'J/ . . -.-..-..--" -::: ../ 'I \ \ , -----_____ ..., '0J;- ..--~__ . _~ v / _____...-- 0.............:-...) ,.., ---- 1;;.'/ ,,~ (!JCinti !\~ s.n~CA'U8)23i.1h r=r--1 4/4/811 1.0=. I EAST LAKE NORTH GREENS ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS (CON'T) MAP 2 WILLDAN/ SIMPSON EastLake ~9!'i~~ Greens OR Site ~i~~ Phase 2 Proiect No. 67 Csftstreet R-eae "A" as a 2 lane Celleeter bet\veeft Reaa "E" we Neighberfieee Park 114 68 Ceftstruet Neighberfieecl Park 113 67mIllfl11Iflllltll~lri~~~ r'lril'IIII'i~~II~OOt QsaII'1Blg~m9il~~*{fB!!}i Q9:fB9~~~i~~m~~~gg~~* CFeeHS Phase 2 OR Site Subtotal EastLake CFeeHS Off Site Phase 2 $~~ GREENS - PHASE ;! ~. TOTAL jij,..,.,.tNt\ID,"..ATES.COMPLIttED..iloA, C, ,..tLti'Y,',.", ..........-.....,..............--,'.,'..,...........,..-..,........".....--".,......"...... ........ .... . ...-- . .. ......-.-- .... ...........-.... .. ......--.-y...... m~t!\~tII~) 34 Amount Method of Financing $3,030,000 SI!bclivi3ieft Exaetieft 623,700 De',e!sj'!lHeftt Impaet Pee fer Parks ~f;g~;~~ 1IIIII1\1m ~!&i~ f!i!t~~~ ~;~igi~ fB9mm\t9,r~YR~~q~~ ~~~~9t~~ .. IS 3,653,700 s o $ 3,653,700 619;tliO(J .;<.:.~.,.:.;.":-,.:-,-,-:~.:.:,,._.,,' fn c:U) CI)"t) CI).~ ~o C>,t ~~ ....... CI) ::JU) oC'CS en'&. - .'\ 9l~-~ UJ~ ;~ ~zu :Sift ~6 ~~~: In<.!) ;:;s ~.I C"? Q.. ctS ~ /I r ..., ~ - " ~....J~ '-1 ",' ~ .L.J :::- tl~,' \J- EastLake ~~~ Greens Oft Site ~.....~~~...~ Phll!ie 3 Proiect # ~~p.IR~~m~i~gl~I.I~!fi~ RM!9l\'m?) 69 Coftstruet Telegftlph CI!fI)'Oft Reaa to a filII 4 Il!fIe Major slllttls eetweeft Lafle f. veftlle l!fIa Il1iftte ParkY>,e.y 70 Coftstruet IIlIftte Parkvie.y liS a fHIl half seetioft Major set...>,eeft Roaa "13" lII1a Of!H1ge ;'.veftlle filllfl_tl;I~~j~~~ ilq"11ITdllrillllli~\i~ .... LQa 71 Construct ROlla "A " ~!1Y!fJii\~~t 1a~;lmy.g as a 2-lane Collector be- tween Hunte Parkway and Neigheor hood Park 1t1 ~U~rnf!qlln~~iWJ~ ~li!!$~~~H~li!t~\!I~!E.#j' rolmJ:$ 72 Coftstruet Ea.stLalre Parkway as a 1 lime Majer eetWeeH the SDC&E ease!Rent lIfla the SPA In eeHftae.ry 73 Coftstruet Neighborhooa Park 1t1 (9~f~gg~j 36 Amount Method of Financim! ~Jj~~~f. mrll\~ $ 1,400,000 Development Impaet Fee for Streets! Assess !Reftt Dislriet 2,265,000 Soodivisioft Exaetioft ~~i~i~ *~tm!),!m.iimf ~~~m\m,t1:?!~fi1~~ ~j~i~ *ii!~~~lm~ ~~~m~t~~fi1~~' 3,030,000 ..................-... , .... '_" _n,' _. ... .... ......-.. ,. ~iQl~i~ .................-.--........... ~~=~~>>~~~~~nl 869,000 Subaivisioft EJmetioft 627,000 Developmeftt Impaet Fee for Parks EastLake ~9. Greens On Site !f:~.~;~~g~\!If~ Proiect # g,i:'II"rtJIBiil,lm&11 7 4 Con~truet ElemeHtftl)' Selma! 112 rl;}J;( ~ Ii~,I.I.. ~ !f4",.".'811~rtlltEmg~l\'}i.~Igf "$"""""""".".."i'l"""""""""""",,,,,',',' $$8 1l$a rlll.,.ili11IlaiW .1.II1\1.II:flf.NN............... [.~ ~ ~ CFeens Ph~e 3 On Site Subtotal S.'O....:mH;'::'."":.O....';RE......:ENJ..S:""',:,:,:,:PB!A....,...".,'".S',.E..:i,Z,..""m;......;r...AL::..:"...," . .".. .. ... . .. ....... .. .... ........" ... .:'.....::.'::..':.f'..,:::..,::...::~::::..::'..:.......::...':.:.:'..:.....,::::....::...::::!::::~:...:;::...::....:...:...:..::.,.:'..:...:::::..:):~::~:.:.:::::.:::.::i:;.:/:::;.:.:::.:.:::. ~~Mim~\m!!9m~&~~~t9m1 (9~t~Mf\~) 37 Amount Method of Financinl! ~f,;. III.MI~mt 4,975,000 Community Pacilities District It I ~?!it;Am .llllIr ~i~~;. m~ml.t1!!~tm ~g9;. ~!!I!/;Y!~U~~g ~.;. ~n.lg!I;It~II~ ~~:~!~ 111~1111~ $13,157,000 ~1~I!!U!1 en LIJ '" .~ ~ ~ c:fn ~Zn (1)1:) Q. (I).~ ccs ....0 ~LIJ Uo ~ C>Q: ~LIJ ~B ~~} .eN .... (1) U1{!) ~fn oca ~ en'&. ..~., ~ ,~ I'- .c ~ '" ~ C'O 'b M I'- IoeM)\Jed rr- '" ~'" "..--,~~~ - !i;,.. ~~ :t~ ~~a: "';::1 gJ' \ii c;G~-8S ~JI.mlm~:..,1 1I~~~r !I~j;'.I~mr.~;;~!llj.~ ~~ 1I,~,I,:,t,~,r,I,i,~,~ . .-.....---. ------..... ~- S...O..1J1FH'."" """..'(j.RE'..'.""JjJ'...NJ....S....'....!PHA."...S..'JjJ."3..m....m..'.!AE..."... . __ ..... d..... , ,. .. .. . ". .. ,.,. ....... -.... .. ,-.. , ,. . .. __' _'" ","," - C'" ,n,_,_," ',' _' ,.-,....., ,', ..... '- :::::.,:,,:..:.:'..:', ,'. ,.'..... '.::::....::;:.,-:...,.-.,, ,"',::':'::::":",-:".;':::',:,:'" .. ... . ....... . C" . ....-.............-,_.."_....._'.-,.....,,........,...........,....-.-............-,.....................,...,....".................",.,.,. .....-----_......"..........-.-_..................---_.....,~.........--,-_.......,........, ......................-............. (9~I~M~~1 39 .!lm 1I.~~I~ilr._ ~~~I. ~~i.~. 111r~:~ ~~~mM,\II!mll~~..... ~lIil .1111111' $2,416,000 ~i~~~i~!m tn efn (1)0 (I).~ "'-0 OC: .s;::M ... (1) ~fn OCU en'&. -- -~~~-;...-~ ...~ 9(;~-8S w\ft ;i ~Z'~~ q:W UQ ~W~6 ~o:: ~~ In(!) ~ "~'I L{) Q. ~ ~ II "' ~'" ..... ..... ~ ~o r , 11 - '" _ t::!~;D L~1~~ '-I:.JJ' "IXCI:: .... =- t'i~_ \J., EastLake Greens Off-Sit~ Phase 3 Proiect # 77 CeRstruetie!ltefla Medieal CeRter Dri.te liS II 4 IlIRe Celleeter ffflffi Telegreph CIIR)"aR RaIlE! t6 Ofllflge Ave-, 78 CORstruetiexteRa EIIst Ofllflge A'te Rlie liS II 2 lllRe tffivehvlI)' froffi I 805 to Medielll CeRter Drive 79 WieeR RortheeliREI eR reffil's ef I 805/Telegreph CanyoR RollE! iRter ehlll1ge Wit Install traffic signal improvements on .,..,. ~t;[~;Pii~[~tI !~~~'~805 toPaseoddRey ....,..... 8+i~ Re-time traffic signal improvements along Telegraph Canyon Road 83:Z~, Construct/extend EastLake Parkway .'.,.. as a 4-lane Major between the SPA #2 boundary and f.j!~~ Orange A ve- nue ~$Q Install eastbound dual left turn lanes at I-80S/Telegraph Canyon Road ... m~13, (lJ/$) ..................... 41 Amount Method of Financinj! 4,861,000 SttlJdiyisioH ExaeuoH BY etIteffl 1,655,000 De'te!el'ffieRt Iffipaet Pee far Streets 150,000 De.telapffieRt IffifJaet Pee for Streets 110,000 De'te!epffieRt IffifJllet Pee far Streets !I{.~j P9mq!l~gj!Traffic SlgiiaiFund 25,000 B!~Y;~!l'ftTraffic Signal Fund N/ A V SlilJElivisieR EXlletiaR _PP.!I!~gj!t~!~t ~~~_t~.~ $ 100,000 De.te!epffieflt Iffipllet Fee for Streets !I{~8 PP.q!l~1' ~~_IIIB.,~.llf~ +6!Ilt Construct reclaimed water distribu- tion main from Jtlmaefttl Ba~ift ReI:Ise IM.:ll! Area to existing main in I...aTIe Avenue 82 Construct parallel trunk sewer in Telegraph Canyon Road from Hunte Parkway to a yet to be defined point downstream Greens - Phase 3 Off-Sit~ Subtotal GREENS - PHASE 3 TOTAL m,_tCAm~C!)MPtEm}!DFAt)llijjty ......-...,....-..'..,.,...........................,..........__.....,............-.-..................................-...........:.....:.,.;.,.;.;.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.;.:.:.;.:.:.,.: (9~t~lrg~j 42 750,000 Dedication by Develop- er 3,221,000 Subdivision Exactionl i\ssessmtJftt Distriet $~W~~m $19,875,009 ~I!I;~ $24,932,009 7' ,,'.~,.,~4;Q99, .... "'-',-,-,-,-,-,-,'-',-,"-"," > o CO 00 ~ UJI ^ .{;;~ 5 ~Z ~~ (j q"UJ ~~ ~ ~UJ ~5 ~ I:ii~ ~~ ~~<.!) o ~~_I c:: o ,- .... <<I () o ....J ~ f ~~; 0.., .... () Q) .- o 0.... e :;s ~ EJ; C. EASTLAKE GREENS ON SITE PROJECT PHASING Although this phasiflg is lIot manclated ey the TranSJ'lortatiell PhasiRg Plan asstlmptiells (Table ;i~~~~~lii11i~,iiillliiiiii~i.I'i~rililiji ;nq1!!~_p!'i~~~~1!9~~pgl~pw! A brief description of each phase is presented below: Phase One Nhrlti(j.~ns Phase ORe fB~.~~[~~N'g[~ includes agolf course, ,~!;!ilR dwelling units, 19.6 acres of commercial development, a high school ~!!fj!!qmiP\I!i~typ!\1tg, and 27 ocres ef commullity ana ~wqpn}@t~ Reighborhood parks. Phase Two Phase Tv..e iRelucles 1,034 cl.....ellillg tlRits, an clcmcRtary scheel, aRS a 3.6 aere lIeighberhees park. Phase ThFee Phase Three ill eludes 930 swellillg ullits, alld 27.8 ocres ef eommer-eial developmellt. $()vtIJQ~JI$ ~Iiii~i~ ~A~~ii%!~fj~~~pfg*fl!'@!y.4w~"ipi9!!!~i'~~!t~~i~~99#tqtm.~~!~~!!\:I$9A9q! im,"",""",~"I,~,"~, g"~, ~,"",""","'.,t, P,",9,",!J,J,!9, A~,~gh"pO"."","",",!1I!".",P,'qa,"'.,..,...,P,"'.,"\\.tk,","'.,.,".,.,......,1',""'.,"",9,'.,.,.., ~,'.,.".,'.,",'.,"'.,s,"",~,.',.,'.,".".,9ti,.,,:p, P, 9,f, i,.',~"., e,"'.",...!!I,'., "e,)l1,""..'~, ...,.""'."',..","...,.~,"'.,h",","90,""'.,)"f ................. . ...... ... ... ............ ..... ..... ... .... ................ . ...... ........ ........ 1;\~~~9...~ ~.~:g~Q!!!M9~~~pprq~im~I!*h4~ij/w~19g'!M!;~!!miqy~~r9P~IDi~!i99~tg~l!i90q ~~;~!~P!1~P1\lq9P(gr~pnl~pl~i'g~g9~!9!!Plm.~lw~PHmp~!I!ooi 'P!1.JiSe):1 .b.... .3.1' ... .3'8' . .1.'... .... ..and'" ... .1 ., .f' . P .... . d'" ..........re.l . .4'0"1 . ts ". etith.. ... ..re ...park.... . J\selncu esappro~imay welngunl ..corop ..011'0" .c"'p'nva' ... . . ...... _._ .n .. n. . ....... ........ . .. . .,. ... ,. ,." ."" ,.., ... , .. ,. , ,.., . ,. . . , ,. .. .... .. , " ',' .. . . .. :)\:::,.:.::::. :/\: /\: :." :":'" ::,:,,::-' :,'\.,:.. ,,:':';,.'-,:::, ,..',,'::.,: ,,::.:.::' :t:"".:::,:.:::: :}.:: .:",",,'.., ::::::: ,.... .;?:. .::.:: ,': :.:::H:.: '::". :,:\::::",::,):,: ::,;.:,:;.:,:'-::':,;:,:i.:\.::::::.'::\:,::.:" :':\\':':'):''':':- :':::'::}'__":::"':/";/ Futl,lf!.\~ - (08/;11195) 44 --- (9~t~ffg~j 45 en 0) Ii CD 100 C C o a:> a:~ "': ~ <oN EJ '" , ~d: ~ ~ (1) en Oa: a: LL " c: o ._ w (1) -0 ..00 ~ CD ~ ctS C'JN ~l()~ N Q)~ "- . . ' , , '-I~'~ .s::. a:Oa: a: .&-,I <:: ~ .. CD a: a: <n en a: \J'~~ a... U5U5 t-:-N<D cry ~ .. -' C\lC")---- N ~, N~ .!:~ ~, .s::. ,..... . , C\J d.: d: d: d: , c, ...... a: a: C') a: a.. a: .:n ...... U Q) en Q)cn Q)~ Q)en ~ (1) en Qj en~ en '-' .....11> 0 ~ '-' :J~ '--' ~ ~(;j ~(;j I"- 0 .!: co _co Cf) D.. .!:D.. .!:D.. :JD.. "- a.. a.. a.. a. a... u. ctS .......... I 0 ........... ~ ::::::::....... ......... ....-... .......... .... .......... ......... ... ..... .... LIJ \11 ~~ ~Zi~ SIfj ~5 ~~~~ ~(!) ~ ""1 D. SUMMARY OF COSTS TO BUILOOUT Ef.8TU.KE CREEN8 l~mlf~~;;;;j;;l!!!;!;;!;j.!.!;;j;!ii;!mj;:.!!jMM;;!;!!;!!H:;!i!~g~~~\lj. $1itl! Greens - Phase 2 $60,870,720 gj~~g;g 3,653, 7OO~9j~9~j. ~!illi Greens - Phase 1 $9'Ptb Greens - Phase 3 24,032,000 @;!Ji$qjB ..........-............... ~PMm~t~!;~t~~~jIt u .....w..,. -.,.,.,.,.:.,.,.:.:.:.:-, .-.-..............-.-.,. .................. ,::,':':;:':'::,::,::,:,:;:":":': ':::':::::':':':::'::::':::::":':': .................. ... ........ .;.,.,.:.".:.:.,.;. " ',',",,"""".."....'2iii("htiti ~tttrrt;;~~~ TOTAL $88,556,420 ........,..............,.,.... ....--.... .,--_...,., ., . ... -...... I~I~~!III (9~t~!tjl~) 47 CHAPTER III PUBLIC FACILITY PHASING REOUlREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT A. IMPROVEMENT PHASlNC STATUS EASTLAKEGREENS ~t.t~;Bi!~;!!~.J:I~- ON SITE The EastLake Greens on-site improvements by phase are summarized in Table 1 below: Table No.1 IMPROVEMENT PHASING STATUS Phase Proposed Development SPA #1 ~~I~g~~~i~~i~mt il'!IIII~t Proiect No. Page Number N9mi~r~iI RP 1& B9 ~Q~qq $!iID,~r~~ 1 1,656 DUs 19.6 t.e. COftlftl. IIS, 27 Ae. Park ~\!II!i~iIi~~;~_!; g,",',roo,"."""',".,'~., ?, t~,}~,'.",'.'.".~ .. ............... ... 53 to 66 9ti~j9~ ~ i!4i!3$ 2 1,034 DUs, Eleftl. Seheol, 3.6 f.e. Neigh. i";I,II:~~ Ii~fi1, p.,""...~, t!im ' . .......................-...... 67,68 .....-----......--......."'."." ~qi1qf9*? 3-l 36;;38 3 930 DUs, 27.8.\0. COftlftl. fI1a$1J.nJ~; gqmp!$m~~~ItE'" l~PJ1 69 to 74 _.............--..-.............. Ig!;J.i%qpit~ 33 $!:M4Q F,'." unite, am,., ase,',' .,'.',---..-,.-....-.-.. ...,.....". .......... ............ N9"~ (9~!M!~~) 48 R. RECIONAL TRANSPORT.'. nON R\CIUTY PH.\SINC The Majar slibjeet eayered ey Table 2 is the aff site street faeilities impaeted ey EastLak-e Creefls Ma the elimlilatiye lIffialiRt af residefttial, eommereial Me iRalistrial, eevelapmeftt Rat te be exeeeeed befare the impaeted street ar freeway faeility is imfJre'ted. It shelild ee Reted that the aevel6fJmeRt limits whieh have beeR set for the regitmal faeilities eover a de.tel6fJmeftt areR which iflelliaes all of the Ikte!6fJmeftts eRst of I 805 with the exeeptioR af the amy RftReh. ,'.lsa, the aevel6fJmeRt threshelas set for regiaaal imfJre'te meets alitv/eigh MY iRdiYidHft! fJrojeet limit. ThIiS, for l*amfJle, if elimlilati:/e regiaaal acvelefJmeftt aiemtes that SR 125 eetweefI Telegffij'Jh Canyea Read RRa SR 54 fleetls te ee eeRstrueted as a fi'Jlir IRRe freeway, theft SR 125 mlist be impr-aYed prior to further aevel6fJ mcnt ecctlrriRg withiR EastLak-e CreeRS. It is iRteaded fer the East Chlila Vista TmnspertatioR PhasiRg Plan (TrP), (see ....pjJeRdiJ( .\) to be revised lIRa 1:IfJtlated eR 11ft lIRaual basis. Th1:ls, eaeh ehllftge iR the TPP will ffiltomati cally beeame IIfJfJlicable to EastLake GreeRS beea1:lse the TPP is beiag RElOfJted as RR IIfJfJeadix to the EastLake Creeas Ptiblie Faeilities FiRaneiHg PIRR. ...S aeeitioflal land aevel6fJmeat eata ana facility eost iafarmatiaR eeeomes lme'lo'R, the TPP eelifl6aries ane fee ame1:lRts will ee REljlistee 16 refleet eutrellt eaRaitieRs. Limits, faeility eests, and adjusted fees ia the mest reeently ameR6ed TPP ana DeyelojJmeat Impaet Fee Pmgram will tftke preeeaefloo ever the iRforRlatiofl eOHtaiaed iR Table 2. N'.'.'..'.,..,....'...' ',' ""'.',' ""."....'.N"lititt..'....'.'....()NA.'.J..', Ff"..'...'...'..'....... , ........... . . '.. " . , .... . .. --..... -, -, - , . . . ... ... , . ..,."'.""":l!H'ASING,.,.PROG .., . "f"F"REGI.', " ,.., ,.,.,.,., ,A"CIIII~',' :.1>.;;;,:,:;:,:,:,:,:,:,:: .c.- . ."", ." :.-.", ::::. '.:. _ . .:. _ . _' . "':, . , , .::,: :u "':" : .',., - .:.: -. :., . ;::;:::. ./ - ",:.". -. :,. :' .:. .: .... . ,::::::':':::';,;:::,:,,;'::;.......,....-.......-.-...-...-.-...-...-.......-....,.......-...-.-.-.-.-'-'-...-'_............-...............................-...-.....-,-...-,-......-,.,-...-.........'.-..........'............-'-.-.-'-.-.........,.-...............-......'.............-...-...-.-.....-,-.-.-.-.-.-.-. ~~9n!\JJ9.rm'!1!\fm!i_Ugjt49i!~f!~i~~g!i&!ty1U9tfi!!e!:i"!i~!'i~wlip9~j~mP.mm~ -- G.i~,g~~'IB~gBl~~I!~~ (9~f~lrg$1 49 rriiJi~Nd;~ g.~!...i~.i1I~ Im~;ili!!;!!!!II!;~I!!!;!l!!~~~.~Ii!~!j!;!!!!H!;;!ji:;j!;ili;!;!!!~.;.mi~.!;!!!!;;!!;;!;;:!!~illirt~ ~9n1'i!!j!1!!1mB;!m;,nIIi~f,@;j!!;;;;"""""""""""......".P.l..{l2' 2 ct&ttt ac.)............'.......!iB5\;!(.ac.. !;;;i;:;;;;ijin;!;II~III!ri~jjj~;;;;',i:;;;; 4;';;~~~',;~~~ .. -.-,......-.'.......'.'.....'.-...'...-...'. ............'.......................-....... ::::::;:::::::;:;:::;:;:::::::::::::::;~:~ ,:::,:,::;;:;:;:::::,:;:,::::::;:;:.:.:;:.;. ;~r5z1!tAi.ia;\ii8aMf :::::::::::~r~::::::.::(::\':.:.::~::::.::::::);t~Rt:f:::::~::.:::~b::::::::::::: G'filf€-6'iifset ......................----_....... ,................................ i!.~~~i~;Er~l~~~i~ ;jt!j~j~ ...................... ...................... :::::.:::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::.:.:.:; ...,. w.... (9~t;Htll~) 50 Table 2 PHASING PROGRAM FOR REGIONJ'.L TRr\~lSPORTATION FACILITIES (i{Mn!l!~) 51 MAP 7 RECIONAL TRf.NSPORTATION Pf.CllJTIES (9~t~Mg~~ 52 CHAPTER IV PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING A. OVERVIEW Utilization of Publie Faeilities F-inanein2: l\kehanisms EiistLa:ke De'/elepmeHt Cempllfl)' iHteflds te utilize the awrepriate poalie fRei.lities fiHlIHeing meelumisms to {i_ee the ReEluisitieH, eOHstruetieH IIHd maiHteflllflee ef peblie faeilities FeEjllked to sower{ tfl.e plllllHed de,+'elepmeHt af EiistLalre CreeHs. --- m~~,g~g~~~I~~~rm~jjr~i~*9qrr@gm.e~m~l;~_g~~M~; l;$~IWJ.Y!$i!'iI~qi!II~.i.I!~~~IimI!I99IUq~ !!~t9j~~PRfi?Y,~U *;:::.~!iim~~lmi~9!i~mm)I IIi1Xm1i1._g~I,.~n.9i1qEi!i,i!EiIf~i IT.i~llllI.trll'lllI B,f!!1f1$f ~!II.~Ii!!_ugIII'llllllllir.~ilil~ 9~H _llr,III~IIIII,.Im,~flr,i~I_~!!'ligtl!~g~~liI~~i1rlI~i;i ............--._------.------------.----..-.--.....--,.-..-.. -- ........--............. B. Review of EKistinl!: Finanein2: Meehanisms Finftnein2: Methods CUFrently f. vaHable CeneFRI Faud. THe City of CHula 'istft's geHeml fUHd senes to fUHd IIIIIIlY pualie services tHffJl:lgHaut the City. THese facilities lIHe serviees identified as aeiHg fUHeee by general fllHd sellrees represent those tfl.at will eenefit lIat aHly tHe residents af the prepesed project, eot 8:lsa CHula Vistft residents eHftside tHe eoulldaries ef EiistLake Creetls. III Illest eases, ather liHlIHeiHg meeHtlflisllls are IIvailaBle te illiti8:lly eOHstrect er preyide the fileility af sefViee, IIIld gefleral fl:lHd lIIaHies wel:lld OHI)' ee eJ(pected to fllHd the lllaiAteHanee eosts aHee tHe fooilit)' is aeeeplee by tHe City. (9~rgHg~j 53 Mello Roos Community Faeilities f.ct of 1982 The Mello Roos Commtlftity Faeilities Aet of 19E2 IItIthorius formatieft ef eemmtlftity faeilities distnets ',,,aielt life ali!herized te impese speeial !ffi{es to previde the fiftllfteiftg of eertai.ft ptlelie faeilities aT sefviees. FaeiH~es v/kiek ea.n Be previtle6 tlfltlef' th.e ~lelle R-eas l.et iaelude the j'ltlr-ehase, eOHstruetiOft, eJ(j'llIftsioft, Elr rcl1abilitlltieft of !he fello'lliftg: 1. weal park, reereaaefl, aT parkway fReMitics; 2. Eemefttftry IIftd seeoftdary sehoel sites IIftd strnettlfe3; 3. Libmries; 4. /',fty o!her ge"ffilmefttal faeilities that legislatY/e eodies are alithorired to e6ftstreet, OWft or operate. SP /'. #1 and SPA #2 are 10eateEI wi!hift Comm\lftity Faeilities Distriet Ne. 1, whieh j'lfi'Jvides fer seheol eapaeit). for the Sweetwater Uftioft Higlt Seltool Distnet IIftd Clttlla VistR City Seltool Distriet. ,,'\ssesSIHf.nt Distriets Sveeial assessment distriets may ee PfflJ'losed fer !he Ptll'flose of aeljtliring or eoftstruetiftg eertaift pli13lie improvemeftt3 tlftder tile Mliftieipal Imj3fflvemeftt Aet of 1913, the Improyemeftt Bond /'.et Elf 1915, aHd the Liglttiftg aHd Landseape ;'.et Elf 1972. The gefteral admiftistFlltioft of the special assessmeftt distriet is hllftdled by tlte respoftsiele poolie llgeAey. Special assessmeftt fiftllfteiftg mil)' be appfflJ'l!'iate '/llteA the valtle or aeftefit ef tile pllelie faeility em be assigRoo t6 a Sf'eeiHe pr6f'efty. AssessmeRts ar-e 1e'/ietl iR SfJeeifie Rf86tlRtS agafRst eaeh iflai.~.idtlad f}f6perty 6ft the ea3i3 af fela~ve benefit. Sf'eeiB:l Bsse33ffieats 1ft&)' Be 1:1300 fer both plieliely dedieate6 Oft site IIftd off site impre'/emeftts. 8P A #1 faJls o;;ithia twe sfJeeia:l aSSeSSfHeftts aistriets (}',.ssessmeRt Distriet ~Jo. 85 2 and Assessmeftt Distriet No. 86 I) formed to provide fer the lleqliisitioft or e6ftstmetioft of eeftftift pli13lie improyemeftts, iftellidiftg reservoir, pump stRtiOft, tran3missioft IIftd eft site 'Ilatel' faeilities, reelaimed waler improvemeftts and street improvemeflts all to serve and eeftefit pfflJ'lerties 'Iit.fiift t.li0 eB\::IRflaries af the SfJooial assessffi0Rt aistriets. /'. j3ortiOft ef SPA #2 falls 'Iitkift the boundllfies sf ,A.ssessmeftt Distriet Ns. 852. The eflgifteefs eeftfirmedassessmeftt, prior to Elmortimtiofl ofbofld priHeiJ'lll!, tetals appreximately $1,466,000. Tlte ceftfirmed asacssmeftt v:i1l be Feaflpertiofted to ifteltlde the efltiFe 8PA tf2. 8tate and F-edeml Futidin2 /'.ltkoliga rarely II-yailable te [liftS 11ft efttir-e j'lr-ejeet, sever.aJ. Federal IIftd State HAaneial and teel1.ftiead aS3istllftee programs life 1I'.'ailable to ptlblie lIgefteies, ift j'IIIrtietllar the jJIIl3Iie sehoel distriets. (9,~t?~~~) 54 The S'ueet'uater UHioH High School Distriet anll Chula Vislft City Sehool Distriet ha'te filed applieatioHs ',vith the State Office of Loeal :\ssistaHce far prdimiHary determiHatioH of eligibility uHder the Lef6Y P. CrecHe Seheol BuillliHg Lease PUfeha3e Uw.' of 1976. If I!flll wl1eH Slftte fUHIIs are malle available t6 the Sweetwater UHioH High Sehoel Distriet aHd/er the Chula Vista City Seheal Distriet, said fUHds may, ta tHe eJ(toot permitted ey law, be applied te re6UciHg leeal 3ehoel sistriet fiHllftciHg of seheol faeility HeedS iHelusiHg eut Hot limite8 to speeial tftxes and/or 6eHds i3sUed iH aeeofflanee ',vith implemeFllfttioH sf CemmuHity Faeilitie3 District No. I. Dedicatioft DedieatioH af sites ey aevel6J'!ers for publie eapiW facilities is a commeH fifllUlciHg teol used by many eities. IH the ease of SPf. #1, the follawiHg pub lie sites were, er are preposed ta be, dedicatee: (1) Reads (2) Park site (3) OJ'IeH spaee (4) ElemeHlftry scheel site (partial) (5) Lierery site (6) Fire statiaH site (7) TrttHsit site Regardiflg SPl. #2, there vtill ee the additioH of tHe follewiHg: (1) High seheol site (2) ElemeHIftry seheel site (partial) (3) CemmuHity pl!i'k site ( 4) OJ'IcH SJ'Iaee Subdivisioft Exaetiot1S Neighborhood level pHblie improvemcHts will be devclopee simuHaneously with relatee resiElentialllft6 eommereial.!iHstitHtional StlbElivisiaHs. TRratlgH tHe tlse af tHe StlbEli',isioH Map Act, it is tHe respeHsibility sf tile EIcye!ej3er to pfe'iide fer allleeal street, I:Itility ans reereatieH iffij3r-svemeHtS. The twe ef s1:IbclivisieH ceHditieHs IIftd eJliaetioHs, where appropriate, will iHsure that the eaHstruetieH of Heighberflees faeilities is timed vlith !letual de','elopmeHt. The imposition of subdivisieH eeHditieHs and &!letieHs sees Hot preelude the use of ether pHblie f!leilities fiHllfteiHg sistriets to fiHanee the pHelie imprevemeHts, wlleH appfepri!lte. (08!3l/!J5) 55 DeveloomeBt Imoaet Fees De','elepmeAt Impaet Fee~ are imposed ey "ariell~ ge'iemmeatal ageaeies te eOAtribllte te the fiAaneiAg ef etlJ'!ital faeiliHes imprevemeAts withiH the City of Chllla Vista. The aisHHgllishiHg footer eehveetl a fee ftfta a stlbdi'/isieH e!i'aeHOH is that e!i'aetioHs fll'e FeEl.lleste6 of a speeifie de'ieloper fer a speeifie pr-ejeet 'I{hereas fees are levied efl all aevelepmeat prejeets thr~lIghollt the City er regional area pllrsllftftt te an estaBli~hed farmatieH. SPA #2, thro\lgh peliey aeeisieHs ef the City ef Chllla Vista ftfta other gevemiflg agefleies, are sllbjeet te fees established te help aefffiY eosts ef facilities whieh will beaefit areas berafld SP..\. #2. These fees iflelllde: (1) Iflteflm Eastem Ares. De'/elapmeflt Impaet Pees for Street~, Decemeer 1987 established ta provide fiflftfteiag far read pmjeew of regioflal sigHifieaRee iH the fll'ea eB.st of Iflterstate 805. (2) Telegffi!Jh CanyaH Dflliflage Plan (j'Irepesed), ta previde finftfteing far eeflstruetiflg dFaiRage ehaIlHel imprevemeflts. (3) Sehael Impaet Pees payaele te the Chllla Vista City Sehael Distriet pllrs\lant te the f.grecmeflt eetweetl Chllla Vista City Sehael Distriet ftfta EastLal.ce Develepmeat Company dated December 9, 1986. CeflaiH fee distriets, iflellldiag the Iflterim Easteffl Ares. Devel6fJmeflt Impaet Fees fer Streets Ilfla the Telegffi!Jh CanyeH Dflliflage Plan (j'Ir~pasee) ftbaye pravide fer the eeflstrueHafl ef the pllblie fooilities ey the ay,'aef/ae'/elaper iH retl:lm fer a er.eait agaiRSt r~lIired fees. If the tetal City ft!JPWYed e6f1strueti68 ea~ts amollAt~ ta mare thftft the tetftl fees whieh will ee FeEl.tlired for the eWfler,' tle'/el6fJer' s pf6perty, the aeess will ee reimBtlrSee ",,'hea fllflas are available as determifled ey the Cit}. Mftftager (see De'/eleper Reimellrsemeflt AgrecmeRts belew). SPt. #2 may ee s\lbjeet to flew fees established ta help aefray casts of faeilities whieh wi.ll beaefit fll'eB.S beyaRd EastLak-e Gfeells. Street LiE:ht aRd Landseaoe Maintenance Distriet EastLa:ke MaiRte8ftftee Di~triet Ne. I was apl'fflved ftftd ad6J'!te6 ey the City ef Chlda Vi~ta Deeember 17, 1985 ptlrsllant te the previsie8~ af Divisiefl 15, PIII't 2 ef the Street~ Ilfla IIigh','I'ltys Cede, eei8g the "Laftaseapi8g ftftd LightiRg f.ct ef 1972" te fll8d ey direct eeaefit assessments the mainteaanee €If landaeaj'!ed street medians, Iwulseaped parkways aREI sllppleffieatal street lightiag ',vithia 1mblie rights of way ar aedieated maiRteflllflee eB.SemeRts iR the EastLitk-e Develepffleflt. CllrreRtly, a POrtiOfl ef the SP.'\. #2 lies 'uithifl the eOllflaariCS af EastLake MaiRteRanee Distriet Na. 1, ft!JPffi'/ed ftftd adapted ey the City ef Chtlla Vista December 17, 1985, whieh alsa serves EastLak-e SP.\ I. It is Ilfltieipated that SPA #2 will ee served either thretlgh the apllflsioR of EastLitk-e MaiHteHllflee Distriet Nt}. I er thffitlgh the fermatioH ef a sepfll'!tte MaiAteflanee District. ('O$/:!MI5! ,o.,.:.:.:.:.;.;::.:,:.,.:_;.,,:_:_:_:_:i 56 Homeowncps Assoeiation/Business CcnteF Ownel'S .\ssoeiation &l3tLake 1 Celllllllllli~ l,s3oeialiefl IlIul EastLake BIIsifle9s Cellter OVlllers l.ssaeilHiefl lut'te beeR forllled to IIIMage, ~ and lllailltftill pm.ate recFeftliafllH f!!eililies ftfId Opel! SJ'!!ee _ withill SP/. #1. SPA #2 ....ill be slleject te a COllllllulli~ Asseeifttioll formed far tile pUfj30se of IIIftflagillg, operatillg ftfId lllailltftilliflg private reereatioflal faeililies Md open SpRee III'eIIS viithill tile SPA ;n. DevelopeI' R-eimbupsement .+.~I'eements Certaifl fooililies tIIat a@e off site of SP/. #ll1ftd SP/. 112 and/or pf6'.ide regiollal eenefits lIIay be eOflstrueted ill ealljlllletioll wit-h the de'ieleplllent of SP/. HI Md SPA ft2. III Sllek illsttmees, Developer Reimellf3emellt Agreemeflts v:ill be executed te pf6'iide far a flltllre payaack to EastLalre Deyeloplllel!t COIIII'MY fer the addilioflal east ef these facilities. Flltllre de'ieloplllellts are required te pay eook t-heir alloealJle share of the eosts far tile shared f!!eility .....hen de;w/clepffieat eeetlfS. 8Deeial .+.l!:l'eemellts/DeveloDment Al!:l'ecment This ootegory illellltles special tleve!oplllent pregrallls fer fillaneiflg eOllstruetiell ef Telegreph CaIIYOII Road amI State ROllte 125. It also illehltles lIfty other special amIIIgelllel!ts bet'Neell the City and the developer slleh as eredits agaillSt fees, waiver of fees, or cftllfges for City eOllstructioll ef speeific facilities. A sevelopmellt agreemellt can play 11ft essellaal [-Ole ill the implelllelltatioll of the PliSlie Fooilities Fiflaneillg Plftn. The Pllelie Facilities FillMeillg PIM elearl y setftils all pli13!ic faeili~ rerlp611siBilities ftfIS aSSllfeS tIIat t-he eallstruetioll of ttll lleeessary puelic impre'iemellls will ee appropriately phased ',vitll aetllal de'ieloplllellt, '"hile the de'ieloplllellt agreement idelltifies t-he obligatiofls wuo( req,uiremeflts of both parties. B;~R~R.~~~.~~~!I~I'.!!II!I~II.II,I~..WI ~~~i:1i!i~~iii~~~ --- .~m~mqOOg;~~~~~Mm~9~;!ifiqtypn~!!p!!,~~gg9n~~~!1jMni1i19~~miP;~9fi.!I;m!PBR N9f!,._9.!9~:m~!1~~mi!lmii!~jj~~I~'P'!!RPAJmRE9M~m~jj~~jl~I!!~PRE9RI!~j (q~liHiY~1 57 otas&\iiKlficaevetowtrt(jra6W$lnc;;;rolectwii~r~iilrewvl&jijiijiltdeWiii'\hm!ffl.tWt(jiects 'l~tli1\~~~~.;'.~~~ij.lf~~.1.'f~~m;ijl~~""""" ...,...........,.,..,.,....,.......,...,........'.,.,...,.,.,.............,.,~"",........,.,.,...'.,.......,~.,.,...,.~,.....,.....,.,.,..., 2;; !> M'.:" it 7; (0~/$1I95) 58 ~bl'.a,nt~".1ID .:~~ ~~~~~f.!!~~qf$. - Itg~$Y; ~(jtmJiUi~nc~!Wi!it'~ (j~Ei.iiIiI .. .. ._- .. . ....." t()8t$l19$) "............. . 59 - _iCitn(iJi$ . . "'j .... ..n"'...,....................... ....... .................. :DiWe 0 . t"",.ID.;ursemetitA teemeuw ....,.,........ .m!.......,.,........... .......,...........,.,....8................. ~~Pm~t~gr~m~t (0~!~y9~~ 60 CHAPTER V IMPLEMENTATION As stated earlier, this document is intended to further address public facility needs associated with Eastlake Greens. The Public Facilities Financing Plan is intended to both identify the various public facilities required to support planned development of the SPA #2 Plan and to insure that these public facilities are provided at the time they are needed. In so doing, the Public Facilities Financing Plan designates not only on-site public facility needs but also endeavors to address regional or area-wide improvements needed to serve the adopted SPA Plans plus cumulative planned growth within adjacent areas. It is understood that assumed growth projections and related public facility needs are subject to a number of external factors such as the state of the economy, the City's future land use approval decisions, etc. It is also understood that the funding sources specified herein may change due to financing programs available in the future or requirements of either state or federal law. It is intended that revisions to cost estimates and funding programs be handled administratively whereas revisions to the related facilities-driven growth "phases" are to be accomplished through a Public Facilities Financing Plan update process. (q~{~~;t!I~) 61 ATTACHMNET 6 INITIAL STUDY AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigated Negal.\fe Declaration h /1r'- (' PROJECT NAME: Modification to the EastLake Greens GDPISPA and the formation of an Assessment District for various public improvements PROJECT LOCATION: South of Otay Lakes Road between EastLake Parkway and Hunte Parkway PROJECT APPLICANT: Eastlake Development Company CASE NO: IS-94-19 DATE: February 28, 1994 A. Proiect Setting The project site located south of Otay Lakes Road between EastLake Parkway and Hunte Parkway and this general vicinity (Eastlake and Otay Ranch) do not involve any substantial soil or any geotechnical hazards that would impact the proposed project. The project is located within the San Diego air basin which is an air quality non-attainment basin. The project includes a 97 dwelling unit increase because of the expansion in land area of the Greens SPA. This will not result in a substantial increase in emission into the air basin or any substantial degradation in air quality. However, because the increase in the projected units is more than 50, compliance with the City requirement for an Air Quality Improvement Plan must be met. Thus, this less-than- significant impact will be further reduced. The project site involves the Telegraph Canyon Creek, Poggi Canyon Creek and Salt Creek drainage basins. Future regional facilities in these basins may neec! additional cumulative capacities to serve the 22.7 additional acres being added to the SPA boundary but the impacts of this project would not be significant. These drainage courses do not enter any potable water sources nor are they a significant source of any ground water. This property has been used for agricultural purposes for many decades and is void of any significant vegetation or animal life. The project could affect raptor habitats but given the limited acreage this is not significant. There are various streets in the project area which have traffic volumes that may result n adverse noise levels. Once precise pad elevations r~lative to street elevations are known, specific mitigation will be identified and implemented. This residential project will not result in any significant sources of light or glare. The project as proposed is consistent with the other low-medium densities adjacent to and in the vicinity of the project site and the population levels are consistent with the project area. Public facilities and services including transportation are available and adequate to sCl~M f? the project site and vicinity. :::-J__:; - - city of chula vista planning department -eflY OF environmental review section CHUlA VISTA The underlying geological strata on the project site possess a high potential for significant paleontological resources. Those areas which have been graded have been monitored and any significant resources recovered. This monitoring will continue in the currently non- graded areas. Mitigation of any potential cultural resources on the project site was previously implemented. B. Proiect Descriotion General Descriotion The project is an amendment to the adopted Eastlake I General Development Plan (GDP), which includes EastLake Greens; an amendment to the adopted Eastlake Greens SPA Plan (SPA) and Tentative Tract Map; and the annexation of approximately 23 acres to the City of Chula Vista. The amendments to the GDP and Tentative Tract Map are intended to reflect those changes proposed in the SPA Plan. The changes in the SPA Plan are of the following two categories: I. Amending the GDP/SP A to include those parcels of the recent Land Swap General Plan Amendment east of the SDG&E transmission easement (expansion of Parcels R-IO, R-20, and R-23 for 97 additional units). 2. Transfers of units within the existing SPA boundary to reflect refinements with no net increase of density. 3. The formation of an Assessment District to (94-1 Eastlake II) for the installation of public facilities to serve the project. Included is Table I, the Adopted Site Utilization Plan and Table 2 which summarizes the proposed residential changes. Descriotion of Land Swao Area Amendment Only those areas east of the transmission easement area included in this amendment. The balance of the Land Swap Area (between the Otay Ranch and Eastlake), which was recently the. subject of a General Plan Amendment, will be covered by a separate amendment. The purpose of including the areas in this proposed amendment separately is because they are logical expansions of existing parcels within the Eastlake Greens SPA plan. The parcels that are expanded by the recent GP A include Parcels R-IO, R-20 and R- 23. Upon favorable action, these areas are proposed to be annexed to the City of Chula Vista. Following is a description of each of these parcels: R-IO: The realignment of Orange Avenue to the south expanded this parcel's boundary. These expanded areas were designated Low- Medium Density on the General Plan. The mid-point of the density range (4.5 dulac) is being proposed. The total increase for this parcel is 79 du (67 du in the Land Swap Area and 12 du in areas previously indicated as Orange A venue/Future Urban). Page 2 WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1736.94 TABLE 1 EastLake Greens site utilization Plan Existing Residential Land Use statistics Parcel Density Acres Target Target Number Ranae Densitv Units R-l 0-5 19.7 2.7 54 R-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40 R-3 0-5 21.8 3.8 83 R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104 R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105 R-6 0-5 17.4 5.0 88 R-7 5-15 10.7 6.0 65 R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 96 R-9 5-15 8.5 5.3 45 R-10 5-15 27.9 6.0 167 R-ll 5-15 14.6 6.3 92 R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 93 R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142 R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 84 R-15 5-15 11.6 7.6 88 R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83 R-17 5-15 29.7 7.2 214 R-18 5-15 9.9 8.8 87 R-19 5-15 14.9 10.6 158 R-20 5-15 13.6 12.0 164 R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120 R-22 5-15 10.8 13.5 146 R-23 5-15 13.7 15.0 205 R-24 15-25 5.0 10.0 50 R-25 15-25 7.4 10.0 74 R-26* 15-25 13.3 4.5 60 R-27* 25+ 8.9 4.5 40 R-28* 25+ 6.1 4.5 27 TOTAL 412.4 ac 2774 du *Interim Designation TABLE 2 EastLake Greens site utilization Plan Proposed Residential Land Use StatisticE Parcel Density Acres Target Target Increase(+) Number Ranae Densitv units Decrease(-\ R-I 0-5 19.7 2.7 54 0 R-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40 0 R-3 0-5 21.8 4.7 102 +19 R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104 0 R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105 0 R-6 5-15 17.4 5.1 88 0 R-7 5-15 10.7 5.6 60 -5 R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 96 0 R-9* 5-15 8.5 5.3 45 0 R-10 5-15 45.4 5.4 246 +79 R-11 5-15 14.6 6.0 87 -5 R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 93 0 R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142 0 R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 86 +2 R-15 5-15 11.6 6.5 65 -23 R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83 0 R-17 5-15 29.7 7.2 214 0 R-18 5-15 9.9 8.8 87 0 R-19 5-15 14.9 10.6 158 0 R-20 5-15 15.7 9.2 153 +11 R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120 0 R-22 5-15 10.8 13.1 141 -5 R-23 5-15 15.8 13.5 214 +9 R-24 5-15 5.0 10.0 46 -4 R-25 5-15 7.4 10.0 78 +4 R-26* 5-15 13.3 4.5 60 0 R-27 0-5 8.9 4.9 44 +4 R-28 5-15 6.1 9.8 60 +33 TOTAL 434.1 ac 6.6 2871 du +97 *Interim Designation: Parcel subject to future SPA Amendment to be consistent with the General Plan. 1-11-94 R-20: This parcel is expanded by a 2.1 acre triangle adjacent to the SDG&E easement. The new area is computed at the mid-point of the Low-Medium density range (4.5 dulac). A reduction is proposed for the parcel as a whole to reflect current planning/marketing. R-23: This parcel is identical to the changes for R-20, except that no decrease in the density is proposed. A net increase of 9 units are proposed for this 2.1 acre addition to the SPA. A total increase of 22.7 acres and 97 du are included in these three parcels. Description of Density Transfers This amendment includes density transfers within the existing SPA boundary to reflect current planning/marketing. These changes do not increase the number of units (2774 du) previously adopted. Following is a summary of the density transfers. Refer also to Table 2 for a composite of both density transfers and additions resulting from the additional Land Swap Areas. Parcel Number R-3 R-7 R-II R-14 R-15 R-20 R-22 R-24 R-25 R-27 R-28 DU Increase DU Decrease +19 -5 -5 +2 -23 -20 -5 -4 +4 +4 +33 +62 -62 TOTAL Description of Assessment District Work The general description of work to be funded by Assessment District 94-1 consists of the following: I. Street improvements consisting of grading, base, paving, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and landscaping within the following rights-of-way: a. South Greensview Drive from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400 L.F., Phase I). b. South Greensview Drive from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L.F., Phase 2). c. South Greensview Drive from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920 L.F., Phase 3). WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1736.94 Page 3 2. Utilities and underground improvements consisting of potable water facilities, storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, reclaimed water facilities, electric facilities, telephone facilities, gas facilities, television facilities as appropriate by applicable state and federal statutes within the following rights-of-way: a, South Greensview Drive from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400 L.F., Phase I). b. South Greensview Drive from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L.F., Phase 2). c. South Greensview Drive from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920 L.F., Phase 3). 3. DIF funded street improvements consisting of grading, curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, street lighting, monumentation within the following rights-of-way: storm drain, base, paving, landscaping and street a. Hunte Parkway from Clubhouse Drive to South Greensview Drive (2,300 L.F., Phase 2). 4. DIF funded street and underground improvements consisting of grading, and storm drain improvements within the following rights-of-way: a. Hunte Parkway from South Greensview to Orange Avenue (1,270 L.F., Phase 2). b. Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to the SDG&E easement (3,500 L.F., Phase 2). Discretionary Actions Associated (but not limited to) the Proiect Area I. General Development Plan Amendment 2. Sectional Area Plan (SPA) Amendment 3. Modification to the Eastlake Greens Site Utilization Plan 4. Establishment of District 94-1 5. Annexation 6. Tentative Subdivision Map 7. Design Review C. Compatibility with Zoning and Plans The project is consistent with the overall General Plan. The project involves an amendment to the more specific land use regulations of the Eastlake Greens General Development Plan (GDP) and Sectional Planning Area Plan (SPA). D. Identification of Environmental Effects An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including the attached Environmental Checklist Form) determined that the proposed project could have one or WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1736.94 Page 4 more significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in the project design and/or specific mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce these effects to a level below significant. With project revisions and/or mitigation, no significant environmental effects will occur, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Specific mitigation measures are set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program which is attached as Attachment "A". The following impacts are those that were determined to be potentially significant and are required to be mitigated to a level below significant. A discussion of each of these potentially significant but mitigatable impacts from the proposed project follows. Acoustics The Initial Study has noted that traffic volume on roadways in and adjacent to the project site could increase ambient noise to an unacceptable level. E. Mitigation necessary to avoid significant effects Specific project mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the initial study for this project to a level below significant.Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and have been made conditions of project approval, as well as requirements of the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment "A"). At the time of consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review Supplemental Acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation of roadways and residential development pads will be available. With this information, it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65 exterior dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast and must validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard. F. Consultation I. Individuals and Organizations City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering Cliff Swanson, Engineering Hal Rosenberg, Engineering Bob Sennett, Planning Ken Larsen, Director of Building & Housing Carol Gove, Fire Marshal Crime Prevention, MaryJane Diosdada Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Dept. Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1736.94 Page 5 Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva Applicant's Agent: Gary Cinti Cinti Land Planning 3625 Midway Dr., #292 San Diego, CA 92110 2. Documents Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989) Chula Vista Municipal Code Letter dated February 9, 1994 from Bruce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager, EastLakeDevelopment Co. regarding sewage generation in sewage basins, improvements and financing Letter dated February 7, 1994, Dennis C. Bowling, Director Water Resources Division, Rick Engineering Co., regarding the adequacy of drainage systems Letter dated February 18, 1994, Andy Schlae11i, Vice President Urban Systems Associates, Inc. regarding the adequacy of the Transportation Circulation System 3. Initial Studv This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study as well as any comments on the Initial Study and this Mitigated Negative Declaration, and reflects the independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information regarding the environmental review of the project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910. ~f EN 6 (Rev. 5/93) Page 6 WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1736.94 Attachment A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE At the time of Consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review Supplemental Acoustical Reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time, the precise elevation of roadways and residential development pads will be available. With this information, it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard. MONITORING REOUIREMENT Prior to granting a tentative subdivision map or design review approval, a nOl.se study forecasting noise levels and the appropriate measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable exterior 65 dBA CNEL is required. I I os.1 I , '" '" ~ ffi ..... ...... ...;.......... . "...... ..... ...... ...... .t, ..... ....... 0-..... III j,l 05-2 5-1 I OS031 , I ..... ...... :ft.a~.. ..... ...... ..... PO-1 AREA OF DENSITY TRANSFER . ADDED TO SPA BOUNDARY CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT C) APPLICANT: Eastlake Development CO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EASTLAKE GREENS ADDRESS: 900 Lane Avenue General Development Plan Amendment SCALE: FILE NUMBER: and SPA Amendment NORTH NO SCALE 18-94-19 . APPLICATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE PLAN IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER BACKGROUND I. Project Title Eas:tlake Greens GDP /SPA Amendment 2. Project Location (Street address or description)East of SR-1 25, North of Orange Ave, South of Otay Lakes Rd./ Telegraph Canyon Rd., and West of Hunte Parkway. A. INITIAL STUDY For Offic~}l~~x. 'CaseNo.~. DpSl AmnL 7"''''-D. RcceiplNo. ~ Date Rec'd. ~ Accepted by "1 ;J~ Project No. FA- ~~~~.DO-~O '. Related Case No. . :;"<,,..::'-,-,.,:::_-~ City of Chula Vista Application Form Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. NA 3. Brief Project Description The project is a transfer of D.U. within the existing Eastlake Greens SPA (no net increase) and an expans~on of the SPA boundary (22.7 ac and 97 du).Refer to attached Project Descri] 4. Name of Applicant Eastlake Development Company Address 900 Lane Ave., Ste. 100 Fax# 421.,.1830 Phone 421-0127 City Chula Vista State CA Zip 91913 S. Name of Preparer/Agent Gary Cinti - Cinti Land Planning Address 3625 Midway Dr., #292 Fax# 223-5108 Phone 223-7408 City San Diego State CA Zip 92110 Relation to Applicant Land Planning Consultant 6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by the Environmental Review Coordinator. a. Permits or approvals required. General Plan Amendmcnt -X- Rezone/Prezone _ Grading Pennit _ Tentative Parcel Map _ Site Plan & Arch. Review _ Special Use Permit )( Design Review Application :K Tcntative Subd. Map _ Redevelopment Agency OPA _ Redcvelopment Agcncy DDA _ Public Project +- Annexation ~ Specific Plan Conditional Use Pennit Variance _ Coastal Developmcnt ~ Other Pennit 4&1:1P S$ If project is a General Plan Amendment and/or rezone, please indicate the change in designation from to b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator). _ Grading Plan _ Parcel Map Precise Plan = Specific Plan _ Traffic Impact Report _ Haiardous Waste Assessmcnt Arch. Elevations = Landscape Plans _ Tentative Subd. Map _ Improvement Plans _ Soils Rcport _ Geotcchnical Rcport _ Hydrological Study _ Biological Study _ Archaeological Study Noise Assessment = Other Agency Pennit -X- Other Proj ect Descripti WK:F:~_AN","""i":\oc:TnDr:',.,..n", ... 01 ,D_" .n.....nh ... , ._~_ _,. . B. PROPOSED PROJECT I. a. 161.4 (amend. area) Land Area: square footage or acreage B53. 2 (SPA areal If land area to be dedicated. state acreage and purpose. b. Does the project involve the construction of new buildings, or will existing stlUcture be utilized? Yes, see proj ect Description. 2. Complete this section, if project is residential or mixed use. a. Type of development=- Single Family _ Two Family ___ Multi Family Townhouse Condominium b. Total number of structures 2871 residential du permittted c. Maximum height of structures varies per P.C. District Regulations d. Number of Units: I bedroom ~ 2 bedroom ...liL 3 bedroom ~ 4 bedroom ..liA.... Total Units ~ e. Gross density (DUttotal aaes) 3.4 f. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication) 6.6 g. Estimated project popu1ation to be determined h. Estimated sale or rental price range to be determined i. Square footage of structure to be determined j. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures per P. C.. Regulations k. Number of on-site parldng spaces to be provided per P .C. Regulations 1. Percent of site in road and paved surface to be determined ~ Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial or mixed use. a. Type(s) of land use b. Floor area Height of structures(s) c. Type' of construction used in the structure d. Describe major access points to the structures and the orientation to adjoining properties and streets e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided f. Estimated number of employees per shift Number of shifts Total g. ~imated number of customers (pee day) and basis of estimate ~02I..uJ (lid: 1020.93) (Rd: 1022.93) Page 2 h. Estimated number of deliveries per day 1. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate J. Type/extent.of operations not in enclosed buildings . k. Hours of operation I. Type of exterior lighting x , H project is other than residential. commercial or industrial complete this section. , a. Type of project b. Type of facilities provided c. Square feet of enclosed structures d. Height of structure(s) - maximum e. Ultimate occupancy load of project f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces h. Additional pr~ject characteristics C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS 1. Will the project be required to obtain a pennit through the Air Pollution Control District (APCD)? No. 2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the propeny anticipated? H yes, complete the following: a. Yes, based on future subm1tta~s. b. Excluding trenches to be backfilled. how many cubic yards of earth will be excavated? NA How many cubic yards of fill will be placed? NA How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded? What will be the: Maximum depth of cut NA Average depth of cut NA Maximum depth of fill NA , Average depth of fill NA NA c.. d. , WI'C-~02I.A." (Ref. 1020.93) (Ref. 1022.93) Page 3 3. Describe all ene.gy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of energy used (air conditioning, electrical appliance, heating equipment, etc.) NnrmAl rp~idential eneray use. 4. Indicate the amount of natural open sp~ that is part of .the project (sq. ft. or acres) None. S. If the project will result in any employment opportunities describe the nature and type of these jobs. Construction related jobs. 6. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or subs~ccs.be used or stored within the project site? NA 7. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by the project? None in excess of those addressed in previousEIR. 8. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary 10 implement the project, and their points of access or colU1cction to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the following: new streets; street widening; extension of gas, eleCtric, and sewer lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. None in excess of those previously identified for EastLake Greens. (refer to EastLake c'reensPFFP). D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SEITlNG 1. . Geolol!V Has a geology study been conducted on the propcny? Yes, see Eastlake Greens EIR. (If yes, please attach) Has a soils report on the project site been made? Yes. see Eastlake Greens EIR. (If yes, please attach) 2. Hvdrolol!V Axe any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site? (If yes, explain in detail.) a. . Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground Water table? No. ~011-A93(Rd:IOJO.931(Rd.1012.93) Page 4 b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site? In previously approved facilities. Does runoff from the project site drain directly in to or toward a domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay? No. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to ~ja.cent areas? Potential exists, but would be mitigated by cond~t~ons to future T.T. map e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location. To be determined by future submittals and previously approved tract map. c. d. 3. ~ a. Are there any noise so= in the project vicinity which may impact the project site? No. Future arterials may impact some areas. b. Will noise from the project impact any sensitive receptors (hospitals, schools, single- family residences)? No. 4. Biolo!!V a. Does the site involve any Coastal Sage Scrub vegetation? No. b. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural ~tate? No. c. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the propeny? Yes x No (Please attach a COPY.)Refer to previous EIR. d. Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate location, height, diameter, and species of trees, and which (if any) will be removed by the project Site is semi- developed with remnants of previous dry farming/cattle grazing on the remainder: 5. Past Use of the Land a. Are there any lcnown historical or archeological resources located on or near the project site? No. b. Are there any known paleontological reSources? No. c. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site? No. d. What was the land previously used for? Dry farming/Cattle grazing WPC:F:\HOMlN"LANNING\STORED\J021_A_9.\ (Rd. I02(t"']) (Rd. i022.9j) Page 5 6. Current Land Use a. Describe all Structures and land uses currently existing on the project site. **See answer below** b. Describe all structures and land uses CWTently existing on adjacent propeny. North Eastlake Business Center Souili Vacant Otay Ranch - Future development Bart Vacant - Future Eastlake Neighborhoods VV~ Eastlake High School/Community Park and Future developmer 7. Social a. b. . ~one on parcels proposed Axe iliere any residents on Site? H so, now many? Axe iliere any current employment opponunities on site? No. H so, how many and what type? for an i::;crease in units. 8. Please provide any oilier infonnation which may assist in the evaluation of the proposed project. Sites have been fully evaluated in Eastlake Greens SPA EIR and recent General Plan Amendment EIR for Land Swap areas. See also attached Project Description for add1t1onal da~a. **Answer to 6(a): Construction/structures exists on approx. one-half of EastLake Greensr. Parcels proposed for amend- ment with existing structures are only being amended to reflect existing conditions with no increase in units. WI'C-~NINOISToREDII021_A"3 (Rd. 1020.03) (Ad 1022.931 Page 6 E. CERTIFICATION 1, as owner/owner in escrow" RRstlake Development Company Bruce Sloan. Proiect Manager Print name or I. consultant or agent" Print name HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and infonnation herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known infonnation concerning the project and its setting has been included in this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for attachments thereto. ~ Owner/Owner in Escrow Signature or Consultant or Agent Signature I / ,d11 I ' Date "If acting for a colporation. include capacity and company name. WI'C'~021.A.93 (Ref. 1020.93) (Ref. 1022.93) Plge 7 ", 4. s. 6. TIlE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Slatement of disclosure of certain ownership interests. payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the pan of the City Council. Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. Ust the names of all persons have a fmancial interest in the contract, Le., contractor, SUbcontractor ' , material supplier. EastJake Development Company 2. If any person identified pursuant 10 (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all iD<Iividuais owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. :T c: 'Rn~wp] 1 3. If any person identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustee of the trust. ron Have you had more than $250 wonh of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions, Commiuees and Council within the pasl twelve months? No Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent conU'aCtors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this ~uer. Bob Santos. Kent Aden, Bruce Sloan, Katy Wr~ght Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contribuled more than $1,000 10 a Council member in the currenl or preceding election period? Yes [ ] No PC] If yes, slate which Council membe~~: . ........ is defUlOd u: '1Itty iDcIividUll. linn, ~rship. joint ......... lIIOCiIIion. social club. fnlllmaI 01l1Dizllion. c;orponlioa. ....Ie. InIsI. ....iver. lyIIdicale. dIis and any 0Ibe, COUIIIy. ci1y and COUIIIy. ci1y. llllllic:ipaJity. district 0' ollie, poIi1ica1lUbdivision, or 10)' OIber sroup or combinadoa ICCing as I unit. (NO'IE: Aaach addilioaaJ ...,.. u .......'1) Date: ~ Bruce Soan, Jec Manager Eastlake Development Company Print or type name of contractor/applicant WPC:F:\HOME\PLANNINC\STORE.[)\J02IoA.9JRd. I020.93)(Rd. 1022.93) Page II Y5-5"f1 Case No. :r:c:; -q"'-f"t INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENT SHEETS ENGINEERING DIVISION I. Drainage n. ~~!G\4- A. 1. the project site within a flood plain? tJo. If so, state which FEMA Floodway Frequency Boundary. ~u.... B. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities? Sv~ ;:"r..oW Tl> ~WMffi..rt""b..4J.JD CtTY ~w~p t:.1J#JV~Y.JMV:.1!!. ~YSr1!OM C. Are they adequate to serve the project? lJo. If not, please explain briefly. "Pf!D.T,:-/..- ~tAc. ~/~~ tMPIlDll!E:M~~ Wtu.. 71L l2e'(UI/C!':~ WIIE#..1 7)~L~r:-...,.,- /'YfJ IDe;. D. What is the location and description of existing off-site drainage facilities? "T,rl t:/"..... 'PI-I /'A-A1'/~ ('~e~ ~&z. J"'A"'Vr>A/ ,;'4~K 4N:b ~,:,- ~~~L." I ' E. AIe they adequate to serve the project? NO. If not, please explain briefly. 72F/.fnt..JAt.. IMP/Q.ol/....~e".,.,-.::, ~y SEe' 1JE';:&:"""!:.4./Il.'( - IN -n+E. ~~ CANyOIoJ AIJD 0./ r ~~It:. &siNS AS t::E"l!!.t~~ /)/ /:.~, . Transportation AIJ ,4M~N'PME.N-r "TO 'fltr!. 7f2,I.FF/G srl/Dy Fi1J.. Ioff! 5I.~~ &~ <;PA If-IR..,Wf/..L BIi TZt:a;Pf~('f% f^,d~,,~ IN ~fc. (;Ji!j 'YMT1e>t./. F14:tvI What roads provide primary access to the project? A. B. ~#oII; ~ What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be generated by the project (per day)? S@C.;) . C. What are the Average Daily Traffic (A.D.T.) volumes on the primary access roads before and after project completion? Stt~tN~e Befure After Do any of these volumes exceed the City.s Level-of-Service (L.O.S.) .C" design ADT volume? If yes, please specify. WPC~,~CMTOREIN022.93 (R,{. 1021.93) (IIof. 1020.93) Page 2 Ys -5'1/ Case No. Tt;-Q'l-(q IT the A.D.T. or L.O.S. "C" design volume is unknown or not applicable, explain briefly. . D. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project? IT not, please explain briefly. E. Would the project create unacceptable Levels of Service (LOS) at intersections adjacent to or in the vicinity of the project site? IT so, identify: Loca.tion Cumulative L.O.S. F. Is the proposed project a "large project" under the Congestion Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips). IT yes, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be required. In this case the TIA will have to demonstrate that the project will not create an unmitigatable adverse impact, or that all related traffic impacts are not mitigated to a level of non-significance. Yes No The following questions apply if a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required. G. Is traffic mitigation required to reduce traffic impacts that will result from implementation of the proposed project? Yes No If yes, please describe. H. Is the project consistent with the criteria established in the City's Transpol1a1ion Phasing Plan, General Plan Traffil: Element, and all other pertinent traffic studies? Please reference any other traffic impact studies for roadway segments that may be impacted by the proposed project. I. J. Is a traffic study required? Is there any dedicatiion required? If so, please specify. Yes No Page 3 WPC"','HOMElPl..ANNtNGISTORED\IO~93 (Rd. 1021.93) (Ref. 1020.93) Ys -91 I Case No. r$ ~""-l~ K. Is there any street widening required? H so, please specify. L. Are there any other street improvements required? H so, please specify the genera) nature of the necessary improvements. M. Will the project and related public improvements provide satisfactory traffic service for existing conditions and future buildout General Pian conditions? (Please provide a brief explanation). m. ~ IV. A. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the project site? LJfo.ll<J.Jow..J . B. H yes, specify these conditions. N,A. C. Is a Soils Report necessary? y~s E:.)((S-rIN.a. 5D/I.E. fi:.~T3 MuS-r'RF': 1JtD6..~ ~t>/u:. AME:"NI:>i:I:> 7?> (/'IC.Woe: TIrE ~ Land Form N../A . 'FJ2ofl)sep 1'!> ~ A1:Pep ro THe: EX/ST/~ 1 Af'pRWep ~PA A. What is the average natural slope of the site? B. What is the maximum natural slope of the site? V. ~ AIe there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required of the applicant? UlJK.Nnw...1 . Af..J. Au r:::Ll hAAl=1lr -r7::> ,HF ~p~ ~/~ No/se A(JAJ...YSrS WILL Be... ~f~r:> . VI. Waste Generation How much solid and liquid (sewer) waste will be generated by the proposed project per day? Solid 2.~ Po/me>". R::'~ D4Y ~vea.. -rJ.f.e €.Jt(9r7Al~ APPileIIEr:> C:;PA Liquid.;zS--~D ~r '-IN.!:> t:I:=.12.. ~y &is.:L5 eou~) 6vEi.<. -ruE rfJ(/oIfK7~, A'PRZa/~ 5FA. What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or downstream from the site? 15" f=\Ic.. ?~U>l~ II-!.......' ,..,,,."AN <!NJYnN /I'fTAY LAVr;:~ ~ At<J~ A /2.l/ PI/c,.. ~ f 1 L-IAJ.#f. fA} ~lLe' ""IJ...J!..WAY 1.,- 1<6 ~~e-:, 7J14:r; II.J. ('t"lALL") At-L. ~~ Wll.[ SEE- ~~ ~T't: ~reo.l AN't:J !;Ac.:r cL>~e-K. ~NS '77:) -ru-E -r=.&"/'-o/'t'H I( ~ equate to s~ f~l~;gr no, please explain) Jolo. ~e ~GtM~ \ \\~ OF mE ~ &~""U f!A#..NDM. ""II../.... <CZ.~ O~ t!AP.l4-c.rrv .A.7f"o ReJr1tL -m (J,ENt:1{A.L. ~ 1\ ' c.1.J J \ 'J R..w 8vrLrYol rr c.Jr:>rrt_ts. AM/!!W nL>fr=i..-rc TZ> -rJIE: {l"1.& ~JtAP# eA,iJvRAl. ~N. r:JY p~ ~D ~ f:tA/..:rOp~tfK SE.~ 1M>rN PLAN WrU,.. F.Il!: r!€tfvrpt::r:>. WPC"',~022.93 (Rei. 1021.93) (Rd. 10211.93) Page 4 Ys-9f ( I Case No.;;r~..q4::fT VD. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Reauirements Will the applicant be required to me a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board for coverage under an NPDES Stormwater Pennit? YES. . H yes, specify which NPDES pennit(s) and explain why an NPDES permit is required. AIJ "'-P.bEa:; 'A:="pM/T'" po./! ~LlIIt/~ 'J)(~"::I;<'~ J660C.IAT"F-'D WI-rn. ('.I.>Io.le..nTlJ>c.T1D~ Ac..7iIl""lIf~. A ~.Irr IS r?1<.<:(1J(f=-> 'B1:=r-LfJ~~ N/,,::::p FIr/liE. 4/1'=-- WiLl ~ D/9ru2./IC:='n A+.('b 7Z.F"/'JI..<)CI::: 7YE- n:>AD>cr.-. I>ifaA:Eu..,p"-'EA.tr" IS. a.b-l>F=.A l~,P.€.~" t!L;AAMJ:JAl "p A IJ ~ t>E.VF".J.N:1Lfe.n- ~ S\... &: . Will a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be required for the proposed project? ')( Yes No Additional comments N.l>N~ . VII. Remarks Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impacts, mitigation measures, or other issues. "f14-e. A-PP1...1G.A",r J..f;A< Rit.e>PM'eD ASS6'<5rJAF.,... 1:>~tG"- FI.'A.,r"'.l~ ro/2. 1"UAl / C IM"~I/~M~Af1"Z,. c:Zjl/9;F Date WPC:F,'HQMlN'LANNlNG'STOIlED'\1022.93 (R.... 1021.93) (lid. 1020.93) PageS Case No. IS -CJ<j. 1'1 FIRE DEPARTMENT A. What is the distance to the nearest fire station? An!! what is the Fire Department's estimated reaction time? ~o st. fn 21't\\n. \'t"Or4.iOh +iVV\p B. Will the F1I'e Depm:tment be able to provide 111 lldequate level of fire protection for the proposed facility without 111 increase in equipment or pelSOMel? \( -e S I C. Remarks /..J OA-'" Q' V(LryJf)ilJ.'f/V F' Marshal 01 /QO /qy Date - . WI'I:~G'IS'I'OIIEDIIonJ.! (Rtf. 1021.93) (101. I02U3) ,.,. 6 - . Case No. _15-'1~- /'1 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 'B. E. F. A. Is project subject to Parks and Recreation Threshold requirements? 'nt:.$'. If not, please explain. C. How many acres of parkland lIe Decessary to serve the proposed project? '\C ~ \'P~~ oj .::::~ ~p\'4(Jt:. c....-z,\i12:i..~,Do.. Are existing neighborhood and community parks near the project .tequate to serve the population increase resulting from this project? Neighborhood ~ Community Parks tJ O. If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed as part of the project adequate to serve the population increase? Neighborhood 't\"!S' Community Parks \ ~":> . To meet City requirements, will applicant be required to: Provide land? \i~S Pay a fee? '1'':'>'. Remarks: D. W.~I~ :2 "f . '1 't-' DItc: Parks and Recreation Director or Representative Paae' WfC:F:~on93 (Ra. IC2UJ)(W.ID2I.93) . Case No. IS,cN-lq LANDSCAPE PLANNING A. Does the project affect native plant communities? If so, please identify which communities. {\V" Will the project require native planting? (please describe) ifu'jt ~~ ~ . B. Please identify any important or highly visible hillsides on or Idjacent to the project. ~ -. """"pm, rondiU~ (D MY) wUl '" ",,_ (~....IillWda' ~ ~~~~~~~/~ ;;;tJ~: ~~~n- C. Of the total area to be developed, how much, and which areas are ex~ed to be replanted and require supplemental watering? (Please deScribe)fpAt"'f.kWd^ 1'5 ruSt- ~ E. Are there any other landscape requirements or mitigation for the project? ~ . ~ ~s ~~~entative P..e I WI'C:f:'IIOIoIEIPIANNtGI5TCIIIEINOn93 Old. 1021.51)) (W. 1021>.93) ROUTING FORM DATE: January 18, 1994 I / / "'" '. , \,- \ (\: -) ~ ~!!) ~ SUBJECT: ~ ~en Larson, Building , Housing' John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only) Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only) Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only) Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2) Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec , EIR) Carol Gove, Fire Department . Harty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Crime Prevention, Police Department (M.J. Diosdado) CUrrent Planning Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning Bob Sennett, city Landscape Architect Bob Leiter, Planning Director Chula vista Elementary school District, Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR) Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved) Other Doug Reid Environmental section Application for Initial Study (IS- 94-1WFA-~/DO 060 ) Checkprint Draft E1R (20 days) (E1R-_/FB-_/DO ) Review of a Draft EIR (E1R- _/FB- _/DP ) Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR-_) Review of Draft Neg Dec (1S- /FA- /DO- ) The Project consists of: An amendment to the EastLake Greens General Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in: 1. The transfer of units within the existing boundaries of East Lake Greens to refine densities with no net increase in the existing proposal density and 2. The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake Greens development with an additional 97 dwelling units. Please review the document and ~d to me any comments you have by 02-01-94 . /----- ------., ?':' ' J ~~~/;- C2 -r)~--h~- ~,~}<- J.zP. Comments: Case No. IS-94-19 APPENDIX I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To Be Completed By Lead Agency) Background 1. Name of Proponent: Eastlake Develo'Dment Co. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 900 Lane Ave.. Suite 100. Chula Vista. CA 91913 3. Date of Checklist: Februarv 24. 1994 4. Name of Proposal: Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment 5. Initial Study Number: IS-94-19 Environmental Impacts 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? D D . b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? D . D c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? D . D d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? D D . e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? D . D f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 0 D . g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? D D . WPC F:~OME\PLANNlNG\1136.94 Page? Comments: The project is proposed for an urbanizing area of eastern Chula Vista. There have no finding of significant problems in the areas of geology soils or erosion. Generalized and more specific substantiation of the geotechnical and soil suitability of the project site is in the City of Chula Vista General Plan FEIR (1989), EastLake FEIR (1982), EastLake SPA I FEIR (1985), Eastlake Greens SPA & EastLake Trails Prezone & Annexation FSEIR (1989), and Otay Ranch FPEIR (1993), and other more specific geological and soils reports on file with the City of Chula Vista Public Works Department, Engineering Division. There will be some modification of existing topography, however, this is considered very minor and not significant given the lack of any significant topographic features. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO 0 0 . 0 0 . b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? o o . Comments: The San Diego air basin is a non-attainment air basin. The proposed project would result in an increase of 79 units within the Eastlake Greens SPA. The emissions from the traffic and energy generation associated with this project is not significant when considering the overall generation of emissions. On a cumulative basis, the emissions from this project are so minimal they are not cumulatively significant. 3. Water. Will the Proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? 0 0 . b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns. or the rate and amount of surface runoff? 0 . 0 c. Alterations to the course or flow or flood waters? 0 0 . d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? 0 0 . WPC F,IHOMEll'tANNlNGIJ 736.94 PageS e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? . o o f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? o o . g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? . o o h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? . o o i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? . o o Comments: The project site and vicinity do not involve any affected marine or fresh water areas, flood waters, water bodies, or known ground water. ' There will be a minor change in absorption rate which will result in minor-Iess-than-significant change in runoff (see letter from Dennis C. Bowling dated 2nt94). 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants )? 0 0 . b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? D D . c. Introduction of new species of plants into into an area. or in a banier to the nonnal replenishment of existing species? 0 0 . d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 0 0 . Comments: The project site has been used for agricultural pwposes for decades and portions are now graded and some areas have been developed (transfer area). This general area is used as Raptor territory, however, with only a 22.7 acre increase in SPA size, this is not significant. Page 9 WPC F:\HOME\PU.NNING\1736.94 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? 0 0 . b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? 0 0 . c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? 0 0 . d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 0 0 . Comments: The project site has been used for agricultural purposes for decades and portions are now graded and some areas have been developed (transfer area). This general area is used as Raptor territory, however, with only a 22.7 acre increase in SPA size, this is not significant. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Increases in existing noise levels? o o . b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? o . o Comments: Traffic volumes on roadways in and adjacent to the project site could increase ambient noise to an unacceptable level. At the time of consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review, supplemental acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation of roadways and residential development pads. With this information it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65 exterior dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast and must validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard. Page 10 WPC F,'HDMEII'lANNINGIJ 736.94 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE NO o 0 . Comments: This is primarily a residential project that will not produce any significant new light or glare. IT there are any unique sources proposed or established, they will be regulated through the perfonnance standards in the Municipal Code. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO o o . Comments: The proposed project is in a planned community which is internally consistent that assures land use compatibility. The project expansion areas are within logical boundaries (the SDG&E transmission lines and East Orange Avenue). The overall external compatibility has been assured through coordination with the adjacent Otay Ranch, Otay Water District facilities and SR 125 alignment. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? o o . Comments: There are no other natural resources such as sand and gravel on site which would be impacted by the proposed project. 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: YES MAYBE NO a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? o o . b. Possible intenerence with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 1:1 1:1 . Conunents: Given the residential character of the project there will be no involvement of hazardous materials above that typical of a residential land use. The project will provide adequate circulation in the case of the need for an evacuation or response plan. WPC F,'HOMElPLANNlNG\1736.94 Page 11 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population or an area? YES MAYBE NO D D . Comments: The distribution, density and growth of housing and population in this project are consistent with planning for this area. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO D D . Comments: The distribution, density and growth of housing and population in this project are consistent with planning for this area. The project will satisfy rather than create housing demands in this area. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? D D . b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? D D . c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? D D . d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? D D . e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? D D . f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? D D . g. A "large project" under the Congestion Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips). D D . Comments: The project will not result in any significant impact to transportation/circulation/traffic (see memo from Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer, dated 2121/94, and letter from Andy Schlaefli, Vice President, Urban Systems Associates, dated 2/18/94). Plgo 12 WPC F,IHOMEllUNNlNGIl736.94 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: YES MAYBE NO a. Fire protection? See page 6 of Appendix ill of the D D . Initial Study (City Data Sheet-Fire Dept.) and 16 Thresholds a. FirelEMS below. b. Police protection? See comments in Chula Vista Police Dept. Crime Prevention Unit, Plan Review recommendation dated 2/4/94 and 16 Thresholds b. D D . c. Schools? EastLake Development Co. has made the Eastlake projects participate in Community Facilities Districts in the Sweetwater Union High School District, and the Chula Vista Elementary School District to provide adequate school services in the area. D D . d. Parks or other recreational facilities? The project will be required to provide adequate community and neighborhood parks to serve the population of the project. See Initial Study, Appendix ill, Parks & Recreation Dept., page 7. Also see 19 Recreation below. D D . e. Libraries? The City of Chula Vista currently operates a library at the campus of the Eastlake High School during the hours the school library is not in operation. On a longer term basis, there is a requirement for a library site at Eastlake Village and a development impact fee to finance the facility. 0 0 . f. Maintenance of public facilities. including roads? There will be no substantial or unique impact on the maintenance of anv public facility as a result of the minimal increase in usage due to this project. 0 0 . g. Other governmental services? Other governmental agencies were notified and contacted during the Initial Study; no other potential impacts were identified. 0 0 . 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Use of substantial amount of fuel or energy? 0 0 . WPC F:'IJ:IOME\P'LANNG\l736.94 Pig. 13 b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? o o . Comments: The project would result in a minor increase in energy requirements typical of a primarily residential project. This will not result in a substantial use of fuel or energy nor new sources of energy. 16. Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely impact the City's Threshold Standards? ~ MAYBE NO o 0 . Comments: As described below, the proposed project does not adversely impact any of the seven Threshold Standards. A. Fire/EMS The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met, since the nearest fire station is one mile away and would be associated with a 3 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. See Appendix ill to the Initial Study, page #6. B. Police The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority I calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority I calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. See comments in Chula Vista Police Department Crime Prevention Unit, Plan Review Recommendation dated 2/4/94. C. Traffic The Threshold Standards require that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of 1-805 are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. WPC F:'HOME\PlANNlNCN736.94 Page 14 The project will not result in any significant impact to transportation/circulation/traffic (see memo from Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer, dated 2/21194, and letter from Andy Schlaefli, Vice President, Urban Systems Associates, dated 2/18/94). D. ParkslRecreation The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/I,OOO population. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. The project will be required to provide adequate community and neighborhood parks to serve the population of the project. E. Drainage The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. See letter from Dennis C. Bowling, Director Water Resources Division,m Rick Engineering, dated 2nt94.; memo from Roger Daoust, Sr. Civil Engineer, dated 2/23/94. F. Sewer The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. See letter from Bruce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager, Eastlake Development Co., dated 2/9/94; memo from Roger Daoust, Sr. Civil Engineer, dated 2/23/94. G. Water The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concum:ntly with planned growth and that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health? D D . WPC F,\IIOME\l'U.NNING\J 736.94 Page IS b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? . o o Comments : The project site nor the operation of the project would result in any significant health hazard or an exposure to such a hazard. Please refer to references in #1 above. 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 0 0 . b. The destruction, or modification of a scenic route? 0 0 . Comments: The project will not obstruct any public view or vistas. create any demonstrable negative aesthetic effect or, at this level of review, impact a scenic route. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO o o . Comments: The project will be required to meet the recreational needs of its residents in accordance with City park standards which include recreational facility standards. 20. Cultural Resources. YES MAYBE NO a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction or a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? . o o b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? . o o c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique etlmic cultural values? . o o d. Will the proposal resnict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? . o o Page t6 WPC F:'HOME\PLANNING\J. 736.94 e. Is the area identified on the City's General Plan EIR as an area of high potential for archeological resources? . D D Comments: See Section 5.2.3 (pg. 5-3) of EIR"86-4 (Sch: 86052803). 21. Paleontological Resources. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of paleontological resources? m. MAYBE NO D D . Comments: See Section 4.7 (pg. 4-75) of EIR-86-4 (Sch: 860522803). 22. Mandatory Findings of Significance. YES MAYBE NO a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant animal or eliminate important examples or the major periods of California history or prehistory? . D D Comments: As has been noted above in this checklist, the site is void of any biological resources and therefore, would have no significant impact on any of these resources. Cultural resources (prehistoric and historic) have been previously mitigated and no further action is necessary. b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time, while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) . D D Comments: The proposed project conform to the Chula Vista General Plan and therefore, the project complies with the long term goals of the City of Chula Vista for the site. Pig. 17 WPC P,IIIOMElPU.NNlNG\1736.94 c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) D D . Comments: The project impacts are so limited to preclude any significant cumulative impact. In the case of air quality impacts, the increase of 97 units, or a maximum of 970 ADT, compared to the existing, and approved units and ADT, the impact is minimal and less than significant. Also, the site is void of any significant biological or cultural resources and paleontological resources will be fully mitigated. d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? D D . Comments: At the time of consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review, supplemental acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation ofroadways and residential development pads. With this information it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65 exterior dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast and must validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard. Page 18 WPC "'IHOMEll'lANNlNG\1736.94 Mitigation Measures (To be completed by the Applicant) I, as owner/owner in escrow' Blwc €.. /If. S 1...01'1 N SR. 1"R()~ /l'k;R EI15'rI,(1<L 7JEr/ c,. Print name or . I, consultant or agent itigation measures herein specified to avoid significant impacts. z Jt;$) jet'f Date Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency. Check one box only.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: o I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. . I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. o I fmd the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ;;"'/,;)0/9</ '-dt1 ~a.A(-Il'A J)~o~/ ) Environmental Review Coord' ator' , - Date 'If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name. Plge 19 WPC F,'lIOMElPlANNlNGI1736.94 Case No. -:I',~. 9 Y - \'1 APPENDIX IT DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION (Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990 - AB 3158) III It is hereby found that this project involves no potential for any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively on wildlife resources and that a "Certificate of Fee Exemption" 8hall be prepared for this project. It is hereby found that this project could potentiaIIy impact wildlife, individually or cwnulatively and therefore fee in accordance with Section 711.4 (d) of the Fish and Game Code shall be paid to the County Clerk. ~"'es~" ~,d 'Y"""",-,c.':'So',--\ ..;0<"'" ....."-,, ~ \ ~ ~C" ~L.o."'e G--~ G"",.c",'.\ -!5<: :;)<&c \> ~.,,,'\ ~ \CA" . '-Ie ~ ...~/ ( 'i <" f) ~1) Environmental Revi w Coordinator 0i).;rd9 V Date WPC P:'HOME\PLANNING\l736.94 Page 20 . Case No. IS -q'i -I'l APPENDIX III PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY DATA SHEET L D. CuJTent Zoninl! on site: -Yc.. NOM . South ,. East }, West ~ (~ I!n.._u....~) ~I If II ./ Does the project conform to the current zoning'? ~~^-...~ ~ general Plan land use ~~:atiL~ ~it~::!,~ -1::~::~.~::~~~~ ~~~;)~ ~~ South East ~- --',b.,-~i.. ^.....A...:T-A ~3-" Dv/Ac=.) West ~ '!-t: " ., " ,fd-" " I ~~ Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram'? --s u.., Is the project area designated for conservation or open space ~r adiacent to an area so designated'? .- m. e.a-.a---- . Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes'? ... "'-r- Ot ".~ """ " p " m ......" .. _k ..,"" of '" -;. ~~~~_-r.~,~,::-.I~ Schools If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: School Elementary ~J-l *' 'l ~ r lunior High ~aI";~ Senior Hi&b ~u. L.. CaDacitv EnrOllment Units PmDosed Oeoeraling Factors Students Generated From Proiect IV. 1/7 "I' 't7 ~~~ ;,:!: :!:.:J 1:~J t; :::~~ J,.,~~ - .30 .29 .10 2.~ ~tl .0 ib(6,.~;L"","" :f:J.'L/qi D I WJIC:J':~onll3 ~.1021.93) (W.I01O.113J P..e1 ATTACHMENT 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT THE C. I OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE S'\. .. EMENT You are required to file a Slatement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters which will require discrctionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property which is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. EastLake Development Companv 2. If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in thc corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. Boswell Properties Incorporated Tulago Company 3. If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is non. profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. N/A 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of thc City staff, Boards, Commissions, Commiltees, and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ No~ If yes, please indicate person(s): 5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants. or independent contractors who you have assigned to represent you before thc City in this malter. Gary Cinti - Cinti Land Planning Bill Ostrem- EastLake Development Roger Bhatia - Rick Engineering Co. Gail Crocenzi - EastLake Dev. Co. 6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes_ No...!... If yes, state which Councilmember(s): · . · (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary) · · · / , ~L (;/_ .:. ,C(//I L(l,../ :o1gnature of contractor/a~licant Gail Crocenzi, Assist. Proiect Mqr. Print or type name of contractor/applicant Date: , .-, i..-- '._ . /" " s, . Pmoll is defincd as: ~"Y individual, /inn, co-partJIership, jaW YOUU/'C, association, sociIJ/ club, fralmw/ orgmUzaliot~ corporaliOlI, uta'c, trWI, receiYC1, I)fUIicme, Ihi.s mid allY other cowU)', ciJy alUJ COUIIll'y, ciry mUllicipallty, district, or other po/ideal subdi\uiol&, or WIY other group or combination DewIg tIS Q WUL" MEMORANDUM DATE: September 27, 1995 TO: The Chair Person and Members of the Plann' g Commission FROM: Ken Lee, Assistant Director of Plannin SUBJECT: PCM-95-11, Agenda Item No.1 Please find attached revised Planning Commission and Draft City Council Resolutions for the Eastlake Greens SPA amendment. The revised resolutions replace the ones included in the staff report. RESOLUTION NO. PCM-95-11 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan amendment was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on January 16, 1995 by The Eastlake Development Company; and, WHEREAS, said application requested approval of an amendment to the Public Facilities Financing Plan of the Eastlake Greens planned community located on the south side of Otay Lakes Road between Hunte Parkway and the future alignment of SR-125; and WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said SPA amendment application, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 1000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing; and, WHEREAS, The Environmental Review Coordinator has considered Initial Study IS-94-19 and has concluded that there are no significant impacts anticipated from the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m. September 27, 1995 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and, WHEREAS the Planning Commission has held a public hearing and taken testimony; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION hereby recommends that the City Council amend the Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, Public Facilities Financing plan in accordance with the attached draft City Council Resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 27th day of September, 1995 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: William C. Tuchscher II, Chairman Nancy Ripley, Secretary (m:\home\planning\pcm9511.pcr) RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AND ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-94-19 I RECITALS A. Project Site Whereas, the property which is the subject matter of this resolution is diagrammatically represented on Attachment A-I attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, identified as the Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, and located on the south side of Telegraph Canyon Road between Hunte Parkway and the future SR-125. B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the Eastlake Development Company (Developer) filed an application requesting consideration of an amendment to the Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, Public Facilities Financing plan C Prior Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of a General Development plan and Sectional Planning Ares (SPA) Plan and a Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), previously approved by the City Council D. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 27, 1995, and voted to adopt the Negative Declaration issued 0 IS-94- 19 and to recommend that the City Council approve PCM-95-1l; and E. City Council Record on Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 1000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the project area at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: n COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA From the facts presented to the City Council, the Council finds that this project would have no significant environmental impacts and adopts Negative Declaration issued on IS-94-19. III FINDINGS FOR SPA AMENDMENT The city Council hereby finds that the proposed Public Facilities Financing Plan amendment as represented in attachment _ is consistent with the Eastlake Greens General Development Plan and the Chula Vista General Plan and that public necessity convenience, general welfare support the amendment. IV NOTICE OF DETERMINATION The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of determination and file the same with the County Clerk Robert A Leiter Director of Planning Bruce M. Boogaard City Attorney M:lbome\plalUting\luis\spaamend.res