HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Rpts./1995/05/10 (6)
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 1
Meeting Date 5/10/95
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: PCA-95-04 - Consideration of amendments to the
Municipal Code to include "automobile maintenance" as a conditional use
in the C-C Central Commercial zone - Econo Lube 'n' Tune, Inc.
On September 28, 1994, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to authorize staff to study and
return with a report and recommendation on a proposal to amend the Municipal Code to allow
automobile maintenance facilities by conditional use permit in the C-C Central Commercial zone.
The proposal has been submitted by Econo Lube 'n' Tune, Inc. in conjunction with a conditional
use permit request to establish an automobile maintenance facility at the southwest corner of 30th
Street and Edgemere Avenue (see PCC-95-22, the following item on the agenda).
The Environmental Review Coordinator has conducted an Initial Study, IS-95-I7, of potential
environmental impacts associated with the proposal. Based on the attached Initial Study and
comments thereon, the Coordinator has concluded that potential significant environmental
impacts from the project can be mitigated to less than significant, and recommends adoption of
the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCA-95-04
recommending that the City Council amend the Municipal Code to redefine and allow automobile
maintenance facilities as a conditional use in the C-C Central Commercial zone in accordance
with the attached Draft City Council Ordinance and the findings contained therein.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On February 16, 1995, the Resource
Conservation Commission voted 4-0 to recommend adoption of the Mitigated Negative
Declaration issued on IS-95-17.
DISCUSSION:
The Central Commercial zone presently allows automobile service stations by conditional use
permit, and minor automobile repair as an accessory use (to a department store, for instance)
but the C-C zone does not currently allow auto repair as an independent use. The proposal is
to expand the definition of minor auto repair to include the maintenance activities associated with
modern lube and tune facilities, and allow such facilities as an independent use by conditional
use permit in the C-C zone.
In years past, when service stations truly provided all services needed by the driving public,
automotive maintenance facilities were not necessary. Now, however, with the advent of self-
serve gas service stations that provide mini-markets and car washes but little, if any, automotive
Page 2, Item ---.L
Meeting Date 5/10/95
service, separate automotive maintenance facilities have come into being to fill that need. These
types of operations are not as intensive or onerous as general automotive repair uses, and
typically provide limited services such as oil changes, replacement automotive fluids, etc. in a
professional, efficient and timely manner.
Lube and tune-up and quick oil change shops are meeting the needs of the driving public in the
most convenient way possible. They are usually located on major thoroughfares, and often close
to shopping areas which permit the customer to leave their car for a short time to do grocery
shopping or other errands. This concept is what makes it viable for several of the major
department stores to include auto centers as accessory uses to their stores.
In staff's opinion, the automotive maintenance concept is basically the same as the "automotive
repair (minor)" category that already exists in the Code. In further reviewing the Code, staff
also determined that this type of use as a stand alone adjacent to other commercial uses would
be essentially the same as the minor automotive service and repair historically performed at
service stations and probably less impactive than many of the repair activities that are performed
at the automotive centers associated with major department stores, which are typically located
in the C-C zone.
The requirement for a conditional use permit for such uses will assure that individual sites will
be reviewed and conditioned appropriately. Site specific review would address issues such as
compatibility with surrounding uses and the neighborhood and would evaluate potential impacts
from noise, traffic, and so on. In those cases where it is determined that the use is problematic,
the CUP can be appropriately conditioned or denied.
Attached is a survey by the applicant previously presented to the Commission showing the
manner in which lube and tunes are treated in other jurisdictions. As indicated in the chart,
most communities allow such facilities by conditional use permit in their basic or general retail
commercial zones. These zones are comparable to our C-C Central Commercial zone.
For the reasons noted above, we are recommending approval of the request in accordance with
the attached resolution and ordinance.
Attachments
1. Planning Commission Resolution PCA-95-04
2. Draft City Council Ordinance
3. Planning Commission Minutes, 9/28/94
4. Letter and Chart from Econo Lube 'n' Tune, 8/31/94
5. Resource Conservation Commission Minutes, 2/16/94
6. Mitigated Negative Declaration 15-95-17
7. Disclosure Statement
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. PCA-95-04
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
THE ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER
19.04.022 AND 19.36.30 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO MINOR AUTOMOTIVE MAINTENANCE AND
REPAIR FACILITIES
WHEREAS, the Municipal Code does not presently differentiate between automotive
repair and automotive maintenance; and
WHEREAS, automotive maintenance is necessary by today's standards; and
WHEREAS, the Municipal Code does not permit automotive repair shops (minor) in the
CC zone as a primary use; and
WHEREAS, Econo Lube 'n' Tune, Inc. has submitted a request to amend the Municipal
Code to allow for automobile maintenance in the C-C zone upon the issuance of a conditional
use permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received and considered the request to initiate an
amendment at its meeting of September 28, 1994, and referred the matter to staff for a report
and recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that all potential
significant impacts of the amendments to the Municipal Code can be mitigated and recommends
adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17.
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said
amendment and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose was given by its publication in
a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least ten days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised namely 7:00 p.m.,
May 10, 1995, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission
and said hearing was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the Commission found that all potential significant impacts of the project
could be mitigated and adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT FROM THE FACTS PRESENTED
AT THE HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends that the City Council
adopt the Draft City Council Ordinance based on the findings contained therein.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 10th day of May, 1995 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
William C. Tuchscher II, Chair
Attest:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
(a:\pca9504.rpt)
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AMENDING SECTION 19.04.022 AND 19.36.030 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW MINOR AUTOMOBILE
MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FACILITIES IN THE C-C
CENTRAL COMMERCIAL ZONE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the Municipal Code does not presently differentiate between automotive
repair and automotive maintenance; and
WHEREAS, automotive maintenance is necessary by today's standards; and
WHEREAS, the Municipal Code does not permit automotive repair shops (minor) in the
C-C zone as a primary use; and
WHEREAS, Econo Lube 'n' Tune, Inc. has submitted a request to amend the Municipal
Code to allow for automotive maintenance facilities in the C-C zone upon issuance of a
conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received and considered the request to initiate an
amendment at its meeting of September 28, 1994, and referred the matter to staff for a report
and recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that all potential
significant impacts of the amendments to the Municipal Code can be mitigated and recommends
adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on IS-95- 17; and
WHEREAS, on February 16, 1995, the Resource Conservation Commission voted 4-0
to recommend approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 1995, the City Planning Commission voted to
recommend that the City Council adopt the amendments to the Municipal Code in accordance
with Resolution PCA-95-04; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said amendments to
the Municipal Code, and notice of said hearing together with its purpose was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 10 days prior to the hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth A venue, before the City Council and
said hearing was thereafter closed.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find,
detennine and ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That all potential significant environmental impacts of the amendments can
be mitigated and hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17.
SECTION II: That the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning
practice justify the amendments, and that the amendments are consistent with the City of Chula
Vista General Plan.
SECTION Ill: That Section 19.04.022 of the Chu1a Vista Municipal Code is amended
to read as follows:
19.04.022 Automobile iiiiMDmU;ID#!i~t@. repair, minor
"""""""""""""""-'-","-'-"-'-','-'-'-'
..................,-,,-,.,--,
"J\.:(i~?~a~~omobile P;jiq~~IRqB~1' repair" means ~BifiM~HPf!l~!R~lliqB~!
~vgm!i!Mit~pii!c1' replacement of parts and motor service to passenger cars and trucks
not exceeding one and one-half tons capacity, but not including other operations named
under "automobile repair, major" or similar thereto as detennined by the commission.
SECTION IV: That Section 19.36.030 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is amended
to read as follows:
19.36.030 Conditional uses.
Conditional uses in the C-C zone include:
A. Car washes, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.060;
B. Skating rinks, subject to the conditions of Section 19.58,040;
C. Signs in excess of maximum as established in Section 19.36.040 of this chapter;
D. Automobile rental and towing service;
E. Billiard parlors;
F. Bowling alleys, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.040;
G. Social and fraternal organizations (nonprofit), subject to the provisions of Section
19.58.100;
H. Trailer rentals;
1. Veterinarian clinic, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.050;
J. Unclassified uses. See Chapter 19.54;
K. g,;!!#im9P~J~mM'i!f#P!W'S~~n9n!P~ir(minpr)i#mI~utomobile service stations
subject tofueprovisions of Section i9:58.280:............
L. Cardrooms;
M. Roof-mounted satellite dishes subject to the standard set forth III Section
19.30.040.
N. Recycling collection centers, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.340.
O. Mixed commercial-residential projects, subject to the provisions of Section
19.58.205.
SECTION V: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect on the
thirtieth day from and after its second reading and adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to fonn by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
(a:\lub&tun.Ord)
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
9/28/94
Excerpt from Planning Commission Minutes of 9/28/94
ITEM 1:
REQUEST OF PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER AN
AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW "AUTOMOTIVE
MAINTENANCE" FACILITIES BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN
CERTAIN COMMERCIAL ZONES - Beono Lube 'n' Tune, Inc.
Principal Planner Griffin commented briefly on the purpose for amending the Municipal Code,
and recommended that the Planning Commission authorize staff to proceed with the study and
scheduling of public hearings to consider the amendment.
Chair Tuchscher stated that he believed this type of business had changed significantly in recent
years and although he felt the current Code allowed for this use in more industrially oriented
zoning, there had been changes in market demand for these facilities, access, and high visibility
locations and the way that they conduct business. It seemed appropriate at this time to have staff
look at it and determine if it was appropriate to make the change in the Municipal Code within
the City of Chula Vista.
MSC (Salas/Fuller) 6-0 (Tarantino excused) that the Planning Commission authorize
consideration of an amendment to the Municipal Code to allow automotive maintenance facilities
by conditional use permit in certain commercial zones.
LETTER and CHART
from ECONO LUBE N' TUNE
8/31/94
011. 'J. 'YonH-99i & c4Hociah~
2117 Jarama Coun EI Cajon. California 92019
(619) 444-8247 FAX 444-8568
August 3], ]994
Members of the Planning Commission
City of Chula Vista
Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 9] 910
RE: Request to Consider a Code Amendment for "Automotive Maintenance"
Dear Members of the Planning Commission:
On behalf of Econo Lube 'n' Tune, Inc. I hereby request that the Planning Commission
cunsider <In amendment to the Zoning Code of the City of Chula Vjsta to clarify
"Automobile Maintenance" as a separate use from "Automotive Repair"; and that this use
be permitted in the CoB, C.C, C.V and CoT zone with a Conditional Use Permit and in the
I-L zone as a matter of right.
After extensive research into the City of Chula Vista's Zoning Ordinance, we have concluded
that this amendment would be consistent with the City's Codes, particularly the recent
amendment to allow "automobile car washes" in the same zones that we propose for
"automoti\e maintcnancc uses".
No doubt the changes in automotive services over the last several years contributed to the
need to re-ex<lmine where automotive washes should be permitted in the City. We believe
it is these same changes that now necessitate a new look at automotive repair and
automotive maintenance in general.
Currently the City's code does not differentiate between "Automotiye Repair" and
"Automotive Maintenance". The City's "Land Use Chart" does have a separate category for
"Automotive Service Stations" which are permitted in the C-B,C-N,C-C, C-V, CoT, I-R, I-L
and I zones with a Conditional Use Permit. "Automotive Repair" is broken down into
"major" and "minor" repair. "Major" automotive repair is permitted in the CoT and I-L zones
with a Conditional Use Permit. "Minor" automotive repair is permitted in the CoT zone with
a Conditional Use Permit, in the I-L zone as a matter of right and in the C-C zone as an
aceessory use. Minor Automotive Repair as an accessrJry use would permit these types of
uses as <J part of a major department store, without the requirement for a Conditiunal Use
Permit.
,
",.
Page 2
Econo Lube 'n' Tune
August 17, 1994
"Automotive Maintenance" as a primary use is a fairly new enterprise. In years past when
"Automotive Service Stations" (gas stations) truly provided all services needed by the driving
public this type of use would not have been necessary. Now however, with the advent of
"Automotive Service Stations" that provide a variety of convenience uses but relatively little
automotive service it has become necessary for separate "Automotive Maintenance Uses".
"Automotive Maintenance" Services, such as lube and tune-up shops, quick oil change shops,
etc., are meeting the needs of the driving public in the most convenient way possible.
Typically they are locakd close to the retail uses which permit the customer to leave their
car for a short time for the necessary maintenance, and while waiting for their car, do
grocery shopping or other errands in the immediate vicinity of the maintenance shop. This
concept of course is what makes it viable for several of the major department stores to
include automotive shops as accessory uses to their stores.
We recognize that these types of uses, while a convenience to shoppers may not be
compatible in every commercial center or area. For this reason we have proposed that the
use be subject to a conditional use permit. This would allow the City to review each use
independently to ensure that it is compatible with the surrounding area and place
appropnate conditions to protect this compatibility on the use.
For your information we have attached a recent survey conducted of the other juri~dictions
in the County regarding their classification of automotive maintenance uses. It is interesting
to note that almost every jurisdiction allows these uses in their retail commercial zones with
a Conditional Use Permit.
We appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to making a fuJl
presentation to you regarding Econo Lube 'n' Tune at a future public hearing to consider
the Code Amendment.
Sincerely,
0~~.
Maril)1! R. F. Ponseggi
Principal
MRFP:ss
ce: Sherwin Lester, Econo-I..uhe 'n' Tune
encl: Survey
(E(~O;<t;OJ) !RAME.~DME"Trn.)
~~
I'~I
lif.
f/) 8'2
'!I6~
f~~
~ Ii
1 !
1
I I ~ i
! _I t
1 IN t
J I f
s) .. ~ _
I i I I
'I I t
! i }-
'I i ~ ~
_ ji j 1 I
. t
I I it I I
I
_ ~ I" i :!! i
.II I Ii I . .- .
I I ~ I l I
~ - i j! ~ I ~
0 "
Q. - II
a ~ J i i
~ -
0 Q.
_ I . oJ U 0;
i I :; ~. 11 I ! I 1
I It ~Iio g~
i N 0
, . 1 j ~
Q. i I <.itli!.~ i3 Ii i " ,,{
~ ! ! ~1~1 5 ~
~ II u " Ii
~ ~ ~~ <i " <.i
::! " 22 ;:; :! :! "
Ii :!) I
2
_ i. Ii !
I :i .
~ III I I
'1' i3
! 3 Iii 2
; g
Ii ~ I ! ~
:t~ g ~ -i
II I -e c I. I ~ I ~ I I I ; i ~
i - -
h "I ':' i
i ~ i
l I I i I I I I ~ ! I t
~ ! I ~
8 I ~ 1 I I I ! I i ] I j I t
2
t ! i 1 J 5'
'e I 1 I I
II ~ ! ! I I I I i f
! Iii .5
6:30 p.m.
Thursdav. February 16 1994
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
Resource Consenation Commission
Ch u la Y is ta, Cali forn ia
Council Conference Room
City Hall Buildini
CALL MEETING TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order at 6:44 p.m. by
Chair Burrascano.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chair Burrascano, Commissioners Hall, Fisher, and Marquez
STAFF PRESENT: Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid, Special Planning Projects
Manager Jerry Jamriska, Senior Planner Rick Rosaler
Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid advised that commissioner Ghougassian had submitted
his letter of resignation and that there was a question as to whether Vice Chair Guerrero's seat was now
vacant.
PRESENTATION OF PROJECTS
1. Review of Negatiye Declaration IS-95-16, Econo Lube'n Tune, Inc,
2. Review of Negative Declaration for IS-95-I7, Econo Lube'n Tune, Inc. Code Amendment
Staff Presentation
Mr. Reid advised that the code amendment was to be considered first since this would actually
permit the proposed use. He reviewed the development proposed by Econo Lube'n Tune as well
as the code amendment which would allow automotive maintenance in certain commercial and
industrial zones. Mr. Reid noted that the appl]cations will be considered by the Planning
Commission ]n late March. He introduced Marilyn Ponseggi who represented the applicants.
Commission Discuss]on
Commissioner Hall noted that letters to the editor have appeared in the paper from neighbors
in the project area. complallling that they do not receive notices on projects. Mr. Reid stated
that they had been noticed regarding environmental review on the Food 4 Less project, and that
this project had also been noticed.
Commissioner Fisher questioned the drainage, asking about the potential for fuels to wash into
the drainage channel; Commissioner Marquez voiced similar concerns, noting the proximity of
the proposed building to the Oood channel. Ms. Ponseggi responded that this was not a problem
per se with the proposed code amendment. With respect to the proposed development project.
Ms. Ponseggi reviewed Econo Lube'n Tune's safety and storage procedures and pointed out that
this facility conducts auto maintenance acttvities but no automotive repair.
MSUC (Hall/Fisher) (4-0) to accept Negative Declaration 15-95-16, with the condition that allY
Army Corp of Engineers recommendations or requirements for this site be adhered to; and to
accept Negative Declaration 15-95-17.
MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
18-95-17
Mitigated Negal.,ie Declaratio
PROJECT NAME:
Code Amendment to Allow Automotive Maintenance in the
CoB, C-C, C-V and CoT zones upon issuance of a Conditional
Use Permit and I-L zone as a matter of right.
LOCATION:
City Wide
PROJECT APPLICANT: Econo Lube 'n' Tune, Inc.
CASE NO.:
IS-95-17
A. Proiect Setting:
The proposed project consists of an amendment to the zoning code to permit
automptive maintenance in various commercial zones in the City.
B. Project Description
The proposed amendment would permit automotive maintenance facilities in the
Central Business (C-B), Central Commercial (C-C), Visitor Commercial (C-V) and
Thoroughfare Commercial (C-T) zones upon issuance of a Conditional Use Permit
and Limited Industrial (I-L) zone as a matter of right. The intent of the proposed
code amendment is to provide automotive maintenance services in a convenient
setting for consumers. The proposed code amendment is necessary to accommodate
changes in the operation of automotive service stations which for the most part no
longer provide general automotive maintenance services. This has necessitated
consumers finding new outlets for automotive services that are convenient to other
commercial consumer uses in high visibility commercial zones.
C. Compatibility with Zoning: and Plans
The subject of this environmental initial study is a Municipal Code Amendment
which would permit automotive maintenance facilities in a variety of commercial
zones with a Conditional Use Permit. The various commercial zones are intended
foster different types of commercial development which are intended to meet a full
array of consumer oriented businesses.
The Chula Vista Municipal Code states that permitted uses in the CoB zone are
"stores, shops and offices supplying commodities.or performing services for residents
of the city as a whole or the surrounding community..." The Municipal Code further
states that the purpose of the C- N zone is to provide 'for convenience shopping. The
C-C zone permits "personal service enterprises". The C- V is intended to provide for
the needs of tourists and travelers and includes specific provisions for the driving
tourist.
The proposed code amendment would be compatible with the each one of the ~,
described above. According to the definition of automotive maintenance fa if:.
.._-~~
--
city of chula vista planning department -CIlY OF-
environmental review section CHUlA VISTA
contained in the proposed code amendment, the proposed use is an establishment
engaged in providing automotive services generally required in the operation and
maintenance of automotive vehicles, for the convenience of the driving public. As
previously stated, the subject commercial zones all have provisions for providing
goods and services for the convenience of consumers.
The requirement for a conditional use permit ensures that each review would include
analysis of the individual application to verify that it compatible with the specific area
that it is proposed to locate in.
D. Compliance
1. Fire/EMS
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and emergency medical
units must be able to respond throughout the City to calls within five minutes
in 75% of the cases and seven minutes in 95% of the cases. The ability of the
fire department to provide adequate service would be reviewed for the
specific location at the time a Conditional Use Permit would be considered.
Access and other fire safety issues would be analyzed on a case by case basis.
This will be analyzed as part of the specific request. The Department would
most likely be able to provide an adequate level of fire protection City wide.
2. Police
The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that police units be able to respond
to 84% of Priority 1 calls within seven minutes or less and maintain an
average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police
units must respond to 62% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and
maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less.
Citywide, individual applications for automotive maintenance facilities would
be evaluated on a cases by case basis to ensure adequate response time for
the project. The Department would most likely be able to provide an
adequate level of police protection City wide.
3. Traffic
The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that a Level of Service (LOS) "C" be
maintained at all intersections, with the exception that LOS "D" may occur at
signalized intersection for a period not to exceed a total of two hours per day.
City wide, projects would be evaluated on a case by case basis and would be
reviewed to ensure adequate response time for the project. The Code
Amendment itself will not result in increased traffic. Specific requests would
be analyzed according to their location, access and projected number of trips
to be generated from the use.
4. Park/Recreation
The Threshold/Standards Policy for Parks and Recreation is 3 acre/l,OOO
population. The proposed city wide project will most likely not impact
neighborhood parks. In most cases, payment of park fees would not be
required, however, in some areas of the City these fees would be required for
all development. Fees would be determined based on the individual project.
5. Drainage
The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that water flows and volumes must
not exceed City engineering standards. Off site drainage facilities must be
adequate to serve the project. The City will review each future project on a
case by case basis, at the time the Conditional Use Penn it is considered, to
determine the extent of impact. The Code Amendment itself will not result
in increased drainage.
6. Sewer
The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that sewage flows and volumes must
not exceed City engineering standards. Liquid waste generation from each
individual proposed project would be analyzed at the time the Conditional
Use Permit is considered to ensure adequate service. The Code Amendment
itself will not result in increased waste generation.
7. Water
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that adequate water service be
available for proposed projects. The issue of adequate water service would
be considered as part of the Conditional Use Pennit process. Provided
adequate water service is available to a specific proposed project site, and the
proposal complies with the current City policy of no net increase in water
consumption, it is unlikely there would be a significant impact to water
demand associated with these types of uses. The issue of adequate water
service would be considered as part of the Conditional Use Pennit process.
E. Identification of Environmental Effects
The code amendment itself will not result in significant environmental impacts.
Ensuing projects, however, may result in one or more significant environmental
impacts requiring specific mitigating measures to be detennined on a project by
project basis.
3. Initial Study
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any
comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the
public review period for this Negative Declaration. The report reflects the
independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information
regarding the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula
Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
y1 ~?,l; r~ta)
ENVIRON ENTA! REV EW ORDINATOR
(b,\lnt.nd)
The following potential impacts could be associated with each application for an
automotive maintenance facility in the various commercial zones, however, not
necessarily significant impacts: land use and planning, hazardous waste, and noise.
These issues will be reviewed on a case by case basis for each Conditional Use
Permit application.
Land Use and Planning
Currently Automotive Maintenance facilities are not permitted in many of the
commercial zones. Therefore, the proposed use is not currently compatible with the
plans and zoning of the City. Compliance with City plans would be achieved upon
adoption of the proposed ordinance. Therefore, the subject proposal does not have
a significant impact to land use and planning.
Water Quality/Hazardous Waste
There is the potential for hazardous materials used in conjunction with the
automotive maintenance facility to contaminate the ground water supply if not stored
and disposed of properly. Standard conditions of approval to address this situation
have been included in the proposed ordinance. Adoption of the proposed ordinance
including these standards will mitigate any potential impact to less than significant.
Through the CUP process individual sites that may be more sensitive will be
analyzed and additional conditions could be applied as part of the CUP approval.
Noise
Some activities associated with automotive maintenance may involve the use of
power tools which in certain locations might have the potential to result in a
significant impact from noise. A standard condition has been included in the
ordinance which requires that all work be conducted within the building. In most
cases this will reduce the noise level to less than significant. In those cases where
sensitive receptors are located near a specific sight, the CUP will address this issue
and additional noise reduction measures may be required.
F. Consultation
1. Individuals and Organizations
City of Chula Vista:
Applicant's Agent: Marilyn R.F. Ponseggi, M.F. Ponseggi & Associates
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989)
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
APPLICATION CANNOT BL CEPTED UNLESS SITE
PLA.:"I IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN 8-1/2 X II FOLDER
INITIAL STUDY
For Office Use Only
Case No. IS- q5 - /7
'Dpst. Amntll r,n!J. ~c
Receipt No.
Date Rec'd. /;(-1'39'1
Accepted by
Project No. FA-U,&>
Dpst. No. DQ- /16
CIPNo.
Related Case No.
City of Chula Vista
Application Form
A. BACKGROUND
I. Project Title Auto"lOtive '1aintenance Faciltv Code Amendm
2. Project Location (Street address or description) Ci tywide
3.
Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. N / A
Brief Project DescriptionThe prooos8C1 amendr'lent would permit automotive main-
tenance facilities in various co~ercial zones with a CUP ~nd in the
I-L zone as a matter of right in order to provide these services in a
conven~ent Rettlng for cons~ers.
Name ot ApplIcant F,r.OT1() T,llh1=> In I '11mp.. Tn~ (c::npT"'I:rJ;n T;~kpr)
Address 4911 Birch Street Fax#351-2891 (714 )Phona714) 852-6696
City Newport Reach State CA Zip 92660
Name of Preparer/Agent Marilyn R.F. ponsegqi, M.F. Ponseqqi & Associates
Address 2117 Jaramn Ct Fax# 444-8568 Phone 444-8247
City El C~jon State CA Zip 92019
Relation to Applicant Agent
Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by the Environmental
Review Coordinator.
4.
5.
6.
a. Pennits or approvals required.
Gencral Plan Amcndment
Rezone/Prezone
_ Grading Permit
_ Tentative Parcel Map
Site Plan & Arch. Review
_ Special Use Permit
_ Design Review Application
_ Tentative Subd. Map
_ Redevelopment Agency OPA
_ Redevelopment Agency DDA
_ Public Project
Annexation
_ Specific Plan
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
_ Coastal Development
XX Other Permit
Code Amendment
If project is a General Plan Amendment and/or rezone, please indicate the change in designation from
Nl'\. to
b.
Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator).
Arch. Elevations _ Hydrological Study
= Landscape Plans _ Biological Study
_ Tentative Sub<!. Map _ Archaeological Study
_ Improvement Plans Noise ASSessment
_ Soils Report = Other Agency Permit
_ Geotechnical Report ~ Other
_ Grading Plan
_ Parcel Map
Precise Plan
= Specific Plan
_ Traffic Impact Report
Hazardous Waste Assessment
Page 1
v.'PC:F:\HOMDPLA....'NING'STOR.El'N021.A.93 (Ref. 1020.93) (Ref. 1022.93)
7. Indicate other applical10ns for permits or approvals that are being submitted at this time.
a. Permits or approvals required.
General Plan Amendment
Rezone/Prezone
_ Grading Permit
_ Tentative Parcel Map
Site Plan & Arch. Review
_ Special Use Permit
_ Design Review Application
_ Tentative SuM Map
_ Redevelopment Agency OPA
_ Redevelopment Agency DDA
_ Public Project
Armexation
_ Specific Plan
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
_ Coastal Development
Other Permit
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
I.
Land Area: square footage NfA or acreage
If land area to be dedicated, state acreage and purpose.
a.
b. Does the project involve the construction of new buildings, or will existing structure be
utilized? NfA
2.
Complete this section if project is residential or mixed use. BfA
a. Type of development:_ Single Family _ Two Family _ Multi Family
Townhouse Condominium
b. Total number of structures
c. Maximum height of structures
d. Number of Units: I bedroom
2 bedroom
3 bedroom
4 bedroom
Total Units
e. Gross density (DU/total acres)
f. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication)
g. Estimated project population
h. Estimated sale or rental price range
I. Square footage of structure
j. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures
k. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
1. Percent of site in road and paved surface
3. Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial or mixed use.
a. Type(s) of land use r,fA
b. Floor area Height of structures(s)
c. Type of construction used in the structure
Page 2
\\'PC:F:\HOME\PLA."'lNING\STOR.E.IN021-A.93 (Ref. 1020.93) (Ref. 1012.93)
d. Describe maJur access points to the structures and the orientation to adjoining properties
and streets
e. Number of on-site parlOng spaces provided
f. Estimated number of employees per shift
Number of shifts Total
g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate
h. Estimated number of deliveries per day
I. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate
J. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings
k. Hours of operation
!. Type of exterior lighting
4. If project is other than residential, commercial or industrial complete this section.
a. Typ~ of proje~t Code Amendment to Permit Automotive MnintenF!nrp
FaCllltles lTI varlOUS commercial zones with a conditional use pemit.
b. Type of facilities provided
c. Square feet of enclosed structures
d. Height of structure(s) - maximum
e. Ultimate occupancy load of project
f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces
h. Additional project characteristics
C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
I. Will the project be required to obtain a permit through the Air Pollution Control District (APCD)'
N/A
\\1'C:F:\J-IOME\PLA.1\o1-.1NG\STORIDJ021.A.93 (Ref. 1020.93) (Ref. 1022.93)
Page 3
2. Is any type of grau ,!, or excavation of the property anticip..__J?
If yes, comp]ete the following:
a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards of earth will be excavated?
b. How many cubic yards of fIll will be placed?
c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded?
d. What will be the: Maximum depth of cut
A verage depth of cut
Maximum depth of flU
A verage depth of fill
3. Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of
energy used (air conditioning, electric a] appliance, heating equipment, etc.)
Automotive power tools and diagnostic tools
4. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project (sq. ft. or acres)
N/A
5. If the project will resuJt in any -employment opportunities describe the nature and type of these
jobs. Code Amendment could result in developuent of automotive maintenance
which could result in additional jobs within the City.
6. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or substances be used or stored within
the project site? Yes, automotive lubricants, used motor oil, etc.
7. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by the project? Accordinq to
the SANDAG Traffic Generator Manual, 20 ADT per 1000 square feet.
8_ Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project, and their points of
access or connection to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the folJowing:
new streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer lines; cut and fIll slopes; and
pedestrian and bicycle facilities. N fA
Page 4
\\1"C:F:\HOMN'LANNING\ST0RED\1021-A.93 (Rtf. 1020.93) (Ref. 1022.93)
D. DESCRIPTION OF EN'VJ...JNMENTAL SETTING
I. Geoloi!v
Has a geology study been conducted on the property? N/A
(If yes, please attach)
Has a soils report on the project site been made?
(If yes, please attach)
2.
Hvdrologv
Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site?
(If yes, explain in detai1.)
a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water table?
N/A
b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site?
c. Does runoff from the project site drain directIy in to or toward a domestic water supply,
lake, reservoir or bay?
d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas?
e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location.
3. Noise
a. Are there any noise sources in the project vicinity which may impact the project site?
b. Will noise from the project impact any sensitive receptors (hospitals, schools, single-
family residences)? Possibly
4. Bio]ogy
a. Does the site involve any Coastal Sage Scrub vegetation? N/A
b. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state? N III
c. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the property?
Yes No (Please attach a copy.)
d. Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate location, height, diameter, and
species of trees, and which (if any) will be removed by the project. N III
Page 5
\\'PC;F:\HOME\Pl.A1'Io"'1N~T0REIJ\1021.A.93 (Ref. 1020.93) (Ref. 1022.93)
5. Past Use of the Lanu
a. Are there any known historical or archeological resources located on or near the project
site? N/A
b.
Are there any known paleontological resources?
N/A
c. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site?
Possible hazardous materials related to the proposed use.
d.
What was the land previously used for?
N/A
6. Current Land Use
a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the project site. NIl>.
b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent property.
North
South
East
West
7. Social
a. Are there any residents on site? NIl', If so, how many?
b. Are there any current employment opportunities on site?
If so, how many and what type?
8. Please provide any other information which may assist in the evaluation of the proposed project.
NIl>.
'W'PC:F:\HOME\PLM'1'm..G\5TOR.ETh.1021-A.93 (Ref. I02D.93) (Ref. 1022.93)
Page 6
E. CERTIFICATION
I, as owner/owner in escrow*
Print name
or
I, consultant or ag7 a
/rp~H'/ ~ ~
~ri l)m Q 1<' Pf"'\Y'!c011;
Print nameM.F. ponseggi & Associates
HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and information herein contained are in all
respects true and correct and that all known information concerning the project and its setting has been
included in this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for
attachments thereto.
Oymer/Owner in Escrow Signature
or
7J,7c+4--:Jl?c~ ~-
Consultant or Agent Signature
November lB. 1994
Date
*If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name.
,,"'PC,E'HOM!N'!.ASNING'STORED\J021.A.93 (R.!. 10:W.93) (R.r. 1022.93)
Page 7
Proposed Amendment to Chula Vista Municipal Code
to Accommodate Automotive Maintenance Uses
Add Section 19.58-023 - Automotive Maintenance Facility
"Automotive Maintenance Facility" means an establishment engaged in providing
automotive services generally required in the operation and maintenance of automotive
vehicles, for the convenience of the driving public. Such maintenance services are limited
to engine tune-up, replacement of plugs, brake replacement and drum turning, air
conditioning system servicing, smog testing, replacement of belts and hoses, fuel injection
system servicing, radiator flushes and all general lubricating services.
Add Section 19.32.030(N) (Central Business Zone)
19.32.030(N) - Automotive Maintenance as defined in Section 19.58.023 subject to the
provisions of Section 19.58.061.
Add Section 19.36.030(P) (Central Commercial)
19.32.030(P) - Automotive Maintenance as defined in Section 19.58.023 subject to the
provisions of Section 19.58.061.
Add Section 19.38.030(M) (Visitor Commercial)
19.38.030(M) - Automotive Maintenance as defined in Section 19.58.023 subject to
the provisions of Section 19.58.061.
Add Section 19.40.030(Y) (Thoroughfare Commercial)
19.40.030(Y) - Automotive Maintenance as defined in Section 19.58.023 subject to the
provisions of Section 19.58.061.
Add Section 19.44.020(R) (Limited Industrial)
19.44.020(R) - Automotive Maintenance as defined in Section 19.58.023 subject to the
provisions of Section 19.58.061.
,
Aut.olDOUYe Maintenance Code Amendment
PISC'l
Add Section 19.58.061 Automotive Maintenance Facilities
Automotive Maintenance facilities shall be subject to the following standards in addition to
those which the Zoning Administrator shall determine for each individual request:
1. Automotive maintenance facilities shall be restricted to automotive maintenance only
such as would typically be found in an automotive service station (reference Section
19.02.024).
2. Major auto repair including carburetor overhauling, rebuilding and reconditioning of
engines and collision repair including body frame, fender repair or automotive
painting shall be prohibited.
3. AIl work shall be conducted within a building.
4. Vehicles shall not be left outside of the building overnight.
5. AIl automotive wastes generated from this use (i.e. used automotive oil, etc.) shall be
disposed of in accordance with applicable State of Claifornia and Federal laws.
5th Draft. NCNeD1ber 30, 1994
(ECONOLU\CODEAMEN\DFT)
,
Automotive Maintenance Code Amendment
Poge2
Case No~~ -95 - I 7
APPENDIX III
CITY DATA SHEET
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I.
Current Zoning on site: NIl'. - ~ci~C'\ "\S C\~~'dE>
North ____
South ~
East /'
West /'
n.
Does the project confonn to the current zoning? t\.\ \"~ - I('ArC"\ '-s ~ ,..;'t..\to-~~tlilc:.
General Plan land use designation on site: ~ II'." ~~ \:0; ,...,..... o._ev:J .-n\~'r-e.;zr"\1'O. c<d
North ...J
South .---/
East ~
West /"
~
Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram? Z3O^
Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an ar!a so designated?
"H~ . ~fI'~ \s C\c1'\....<\"\tD .~~r\~("
, ,
Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? N \ ~
(If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance the scenic quality of the
route).
m. Schools
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: N I '"
School
CaDacitv
Enrollment
Units
Prooosed
Generating
Factors
.30
.29
.10
Students
Generated
From Proiect
Elementaty
1unior High
Senior High
IV. Remarks:
.s.A ~.I":/
Director of lanning or Representative
I/..:U / <1.'5'"
Date . I
WPC,p,'IIOId!N'LANNJNG\nORED\I022.93 (Ref. I02U3) (Ref. 1021>.93)
Pile 1
Case No. /5q5-/7
LANDSCAPE PLANNING
A. Does the project affect native plant communities?
If so, please identify which communities.
Will the project require native planting? (Please describe)
B. Please identify any irnponant or highly visible hillsides on or adjacent to the project.
What landscaping conditions (if any) will be required for these hillsides?
C. Of the total area to be developed. how much. and which areas are expected to be replanted
and require supplemental watering? (Please describe).
E. Are there any other landscape requirements or mitigation for the project?
/'//
......',/ . /
._,___:/~ .; L-- )-1. ,;,..
~3//:5-
City Landscape Architect or Representative
Date
Page 8
WPC:F:\IIOMEII'I.o\NNG\nORED\I022.93 (Rcl. 1021.93) (Ref. 1020.931
Case No, 18-95-17
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Name of Proponent: Econo Lube 'n' Tune, Inc.
2.
Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth A venue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
3.
Address and Phone Number of Proponent:
Econo Lube n' Tune, Inc. (Sherwin Lisker)
49 I I Birch Street
Newport Beach, California 92660
(714) 852-6696
4.
Name of Proposal:
Amendment to the Municipal Code of the City of Chula Vista to permit
Automotive Maintenance Facilities in a variety of commercial zones with
a conditional use permit.
5. Date of Checklist: January 31, 1995
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less than
Significant Unleu Significant No
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or D D D 181
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or D 181 D D
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
cJ Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., D D D 181
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of
an established community (including a low-
income or minority community)?
D
D
D
181
Comments: The proposed project is an amendment to the Municipal Code. Currently Automotive
Maintenance Facilities are not permitted in several of the commercial zones. Adoption of this Code
Amendment will permit these types of uses in certain commercial zones with a CUP. Adoption of the
Amendment will make the proposed use in compliance with the Municipal Code and therefore
mitigate any potential environmental impact to land use plan compatibility.
(b:\econol&tckl)
Page 1
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING, Would the
proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in
an undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigated
No
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impacl
D
D
D
181
D
D
D
181
D
D
D
181
Comments: The proposed project is a code amendment to permit automotive maintenance facilities
in several commercial zones with a CUP. The proposed amendment will not affect housing or
population.
g) Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on geophysical conditions.
III, GEOPHYSICAL, Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructures?
b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
d) The destruction, covering or modification of
any unique geologic or physical features?
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
f) Changes in deposition or erosioD of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any
bay inlet or lake?
D D D 181
D D D 181
D D D 181
D D D 181
D D D 181
D D D 181
D
D
D
181
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, D D D 181
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related D D D 181
hazards such as flooding or tidal waves?
(b:\econol&tckl)
Page 2
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less than
Significant Unlen Significant No
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
C) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration D D D 181
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any D D D 181
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction D D D 181
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either D D D 181
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of D D D 181
groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? D 181 D D
i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood D D D 181
waters?
j) Substantial reduction in the amount of water D D D 181
otherwise available for public water supplies?
Comments: A utomotive maintenance facilities provide a variety of automotive services including oil
changes, lubrication services, etc. There is the potential for the hazardous materials associated with
these services (used motor oil, etc.) to contaminate ground water if it is not stored and disposed of
properly. Conditions to address this situation have been included in the draft Code Amendment. If
adopted as proposed, these conditions would be imposed as standard conditions on every CUP for
Automotive Maintenance which would mitigate the potential impact to less than significant.
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
D
D
D
181
D
D
D
181
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature,
or cause any change in climate, either locally or
regionally?
d) Create objectionable odors?
D
D
D
181
D
D
D
181
e) Create a substantial increase in stationary or
non-stationary sources of air emissions or the
deterioration of ambient air quality?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on air quality.
D
D
D
181
Page 3
(b:\econoJ&tckl)
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would
the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
1) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigated
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Leu than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
N"
Impact
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
h) A "large project" under the Congestion
Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400
or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or
more peak-hour vehicle trips.)
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed use is estimated to generate approximately 20 ADT per
1,000 square foot of building. Each proposal will be evaluated on an individual basis during their
Conditional Use Pennit process. At that time the ability of surrounding streets, to a specific proposed
site, to accommodate the proposed project would be evaluated. The proposed amendment will have
no affect on transportation/circulation.
VII, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of
concern or species that are candidates for
listing?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g,
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal
pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
1) Affect regional habitat preservation planning
efforts?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
(b:\ecoool&tckl)
Page 4
Potentially
Significant
Impact
POlentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigated
N.
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on biological resources.
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES,
Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 181
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 181
inefficient manner?
c) I f the site is designated for mineral resource 0 0 0 181
protection, will this project impact this
protection?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on energy and mineral
resources.
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: petroleum products, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard?
o
o
o
181
0 0 0 181
0 0 0 181
0 0 0 181
0 0 0 181
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees?
Comments: As discussed under Air Quality, there is a potential for hazardous material to enter
ground water if not stored and disposed of correctly. The use proposed in the code amendment would
not have potential hazardous materials impacts beyond those already discussed. Per Section ]4.20.]20
of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, automotive maintenance facilities must incorporate storm water
pollution prevention measures into their hazardous materials response plan, which is required by
Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code.
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 181 0 0
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 181 0 0
(b:\l'conoJ&!.ckl)
Page 5
Potentially
Significant
Impacl
Potentially
Significant
Unleu
Mitigated
Less than
Significant
Impacl
No
Impact
Comments: There is a potential for these types of facilities to create noise impacts for sensitive
receptors. Impacts would be assessed for each individual site at the time of the Conditional Use
Permit consideration. Conditions to address this potential impact have been included in the draft Code
AmendmeDt. I f adopted as proposed, these conditions would be imposed as standard conditions on
every CUP for Automotive Maintenance. These conditions would mitigate the potential impact to less
than significant.
XI, PUBLIC SERVICES, Would the proposal have
an eftixt upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government services in any of the following
areas:
a) Fire protection? D D D 181
b) Police protection? D D D 181
c) Schools? D D D 181
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including D D D 181
roads?
e) Other governmental services? D D D 181
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on energy and mineral
resources.
XII.
Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely impact the
City's Threshold Standards?
D
D
D
181
As described below, the proposed project does not adversely impact any of the seen Threshold
Standards.
a) Fire/EMS
D
D
D
181
The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to
calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of
the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met,
since the nearest fire station is nla miles away and would be associated with a ~
minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
b) Police
D
D
D
181
The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority I calls
within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of
4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7
minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes
or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
(b:\econol&l,ckl)
Page 6
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less than
Significant Unless Significant N.
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
C) Traffic 0 0 0 181
The Threshold Standards require that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service
(LOS) "c" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "0" may occur
during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of
1-805 are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS
liEn or ItFII during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway
ramps are exempted from this Standard. The proposed project will comply with this
Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
d) Parks/Recreation
o
o
o
181
The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/I,OOO population. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
e) Drainage
o
o
o
181
The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed
City Engineering Standards. Individual projects wi!! provide necessary
improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Planes) and City Engineering
Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
f) Sewer
o
o
o
181
The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with Sewer Master Plane s) and City Engineering Standards. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
g) Water
o
o
o
181
The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission
facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality
standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project wi!!
comply with this Threshold Standard.
Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-
set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building pemit issuance.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
(b:\econoJ&t.ckl)
Page 7
Potentially
Poteatially Significant Less than
Sigaificant Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
XIII, UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS, Would
the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 181
b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 181
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 181
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 181
e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 181
f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 181
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on utilities and service
systems in the City.
XIV, AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the 0 0 0 181
public or will the proposal result in the creation
of an aesthetically offensive site open to public
view?
b) Cause the destruction or modification of a 0 0 0 181
scenic route?
c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 181
d) Create added light or glare sources that could 0 0 0 181
increase the level of sky glow in an area or
cause this project to fail to comply with Section
19.66.100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code,
Title 19?
e) Reduce an additional amount of spill light? 0 0 0 181
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect On views or other
aesthetic considerations in the City.
XV. CULTURAL RESOURCES, Would the proposal:
a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or
the destruction or a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical or
aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure or object?
o
o
o
181
o
o
o
181
(b:\econol&tckl)
Page 8
d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or
sacred uses within the potential impact area?
e) Is the area identified on the City's General Plan
ElR as an area of high potential for
archeological resources?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on cultural resources.
XVI. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Will the
proposal result in the alteration of or the
destruction of paleontological resources?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on paleontological
resources.
c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a
physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
Potentially
Potentially Significant Leu than
Significant Uolen Significant N.
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
0 0 0 181
o
o
o
181
o
o
o
181
o
o
o
181
XVII. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 181
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 181
c) Interfere with recreation parks & recreation 0 0 0 181
plans or programs?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on recreation.
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE: See Negative Declaration for
mandatory findings of significance. If an EIR is
needed, this section should be completed.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods or
California history or prehistory?
o
o
o
181
(b\econol&tckl)
Page 9
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Comments: The proposed project, an amendment to the Amendment Code, does not have the
potential to degrade the quality of the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species or
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels.
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
D
D
D
181
Comments: The project is in compliance with the intent of the commercial zones to provide
consumer services in a convenient manner. The proposed code amendment does call for these uses to
be subject to a Conditional Use Permit in order to review them on a cases by case basis. The
conditional use permit process does call for certain findings to be made which will ensure that specific
use requests are compatible with surrounding uses.
c) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
D
D
D
181
Comments: The environmental analysis determined that all potential impacts may be mitigated to
below a level of significance and there are no impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively
considerable.
d) Does the project have environmental effect
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Comments: The project does not have the potential to cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings.
D
D
D
181
(b:leconol&tckl) Page 10
ENVIRONMENTAL FACrORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
~ Land Use and Planning 0 Transportation/Circulation 0 Public Services
0 Population and Housing 0 Biological Resources 0 Utilities and Service Systems
0 Geophysical 0 Energy and Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics
~ Water 0 Hazards 0 Cultural Resources
0 Air Quality ~ Noise 0 Recreation
0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and 0
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, 181
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an 0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least 0
one effect: I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as
described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impacts" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it
must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
'd?
Signature
'fo~ (cfrAVJ ~O,~j )
i /,~d CJ<)
Date' I
Environmental Review Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
(b:\econol&t.ckl)
Page II
ROUTING FORM
DATE: December 29, 1994
~ ~.,J'i
.' (1J
FRpM;~ .
__ .<'1)
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Bal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec & EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (Capt. Zoll)
Community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
Current Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union B.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) .
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Martin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only)
other
Doua Reid
Environmental Section
SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (IS- 95-17 /FA-~/DQ 145 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DQ )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP)
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR--l
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ- J
The Project consists of: A zone text amendment to permit automotive
maintenance facilities as a conditional use
use is the C-B, C-S, C-V and C-T zones and
as a permitted use in the I-L zone,
Location: City Wide
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by 1/17/95 ,
. )
I ' ",.\
Comments:
A', \'"
I.. J"
,s~ '...( ,
() C (
I. 'L l' > tl S
YS-'I"
ROUTING FORM
J^tJ.<.JM..Y (J... J 1~5"
DATE:" I f1 . : I
.--""
- ~')
ffl.olA: 'J'(:f:
Ken Larson, Building , Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cli:t:t SWanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudol:t, Asst City Attorney (Dra:tt Neg Dec , EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks , Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (Capt. Zoll)
Community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
CUrrent Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
SWeetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS' EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Dra:tt EIR - I:t annexation is involved)
Martin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route :torm only)
Other
-rz,:
J:ReM":
Douo Reid
Environmental Section
SUBJECT: Application :tor Initial Study (IS- 95-17 /FA-..222..../DQ 145 )
Checkprint Dra:tt EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DQ )
Review o:t a Dra:tt EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP)
Review o:t Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR--l
Review o:t Dra:tt Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ_ )
The Project consists o:t: A zone text amendment to permit automotive
maintenance facilities as a conditional use
use is the C-B, C-S, C-V and C-T zones and
as a permitted use in the I-L zone,
Location: City Wide
Please review the document and :forward to me any comments you have
by 1/17/95
Comments: 0 PE'/2. SeCTION 14.2D. ('2D OF mE C}(-uCA VI~7A. /v(V/JIC-,PAc... 4>l>E:,
Af..IT'l>Mp,/. YE /oJtA;r^lT13!JA+J.C.E F',6C;(r...lTI~S MvSr ''''Go(2.Pc~TE ~ ~ ~l-LU'77e,J
puv~COJ MEW;u/2.:E.'S ifoJT?> (FfEte.. HA~r.JG ~A'-"; RE6P~SE. PVIfJ" WIHGFf ($
'f!.E6(Uf~D $'1 Cf.tA~ t;,!'5 ~F T1-tE ~I~IA ~-nf Nib s:..Fe:TY ~' (j)TIfE
~I) (~ t:be;; Nor (/oIc.c...ut>E. A ~C- S 'I Zo>JE ' Z<:>N'MG
~
11/'2-1 "t5
C H U L A V 1ST A POL ICE D E PAR T MEN T
C RIM E PRE V E N T ION U NIT
PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS
DATE: n \it l' ('1\. j I
TO:
VIA:
! 0 c( .s,
FROM:
.) .
1-:)1(\ (:'('-.~J'- I\~: .,d,
e:, i f;?o IJ ,t t[:C~
<, C' .l'
c_ \i \ V I r t, v-\. vf".Lfl.._ t'L_ __
(Y\()
. /1
'J
r ," (; <::-~
-"- r~)
PROJECT:
Initial Study 95~- !?
e(r Cll O~l<j'L reliC/IC
-L
The Police Department and the Crime Prevention Unit will
able to provide an adequate level of service for this
proposed site,
There is no expected increase in personnel or equipment in
order to maintain Police Department services.
be
'f
Please forward additional information regarding this project
to the Crime Prevention Unit,
Estimated response times for Priority 1 calls to this project:
L/ '. 32 'I + d ( ,<,. q ::, ")
{ .-/
Estimated
response times
(;
,) l)
)
.j/I/J'f'r
l;-~ I <:-'
for Priority 2 calls to
( 1 cl l \) . ({ sj
this project:
(';;L,: Comments:
lC('.Af
^
(> V C ~1'" ../\ J
I ~.. Cr \ I ci
c ,
(.\_t ".i-i,. ~17
nr-f ~,({\ \.I-~-\ {'{ud (I
\. .
r\:>'L (lil...CL/) ..J
l
-h:" r',
~
(,\'.1/1
,
\) f\-..'
. \
'1((;;'\
( c t:= ''-- )
~ -
cc:
Brookover, SCA
CPTED Routing form
PD(cpu 06(93
;HULA VISTA POLICE DEPAR...1ENT
CRIME PREVENTION UNIT
PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS
l
DATE: 1wz../;(~ 'HI iff"'.J
TO: Ut?UfJ I~d; t.nV;~~JI}I
VIA: ~t ~ I Wn/DI V'5/~A..Ja-r'1>
FROM: YY\(j~..J,,J d I ;:,C!Y S
PROJECT: ::r:: s "IS -17 f' ~O kb e.. ? 'lklu...-
{
~ The Crime Prevention Unit does not have any comments regarding this project at this time.
Infonnation on the project, or within the plans, does not provide enough detail to pennit
crime prevention analysis.
Please forward the following infonnation to the Crime Prevention Unit when available.
Elevations
Floor Plans
Landscape and Lighting Plans
Site Development Plans
Comments: .d Lt:,,~ ~ CH5( 0- J"~' ~ \Y--' L--LQ.. '^'-~
::"t:1l ,~r:: '~^~~~""J '~~~~":,~~;;:~ ""~
(/VI ~ A dv. J 4.i-v'I?d -l/tiJrLirJ .
~ ~--w "E~, 1 (1)L f ~ I'--U
TV\..0: ; "'"'.:to A^. '" N-. (' -'-
-fA,
4J~ J 'hi ~A~ f
~ Q",,-J: 0- C':+- fR..v
cc: Brookover, SCA
CPTED Routing FOffi1
PD/cpu 06/93
ROUTING FORM
DATE: December 29, 1994
TO: Ken Larson, Building , Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec , EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks , Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (Capt. Zoll)
Community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
Current Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, city Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS' EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Martin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only)
Other
FROM:
Douq Reid
Environmental Section
SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (IS- 95-17/FA-~/DQ 145 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DQ )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP)
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR-----J
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ_ )
The Project consists of: A zone text amendment to permit automotive
maintenance facilities as a conditional use
~se is the C-6, C-$; C-V and C-T zones and
as a permitted use in the I-L zone.
Location: City Wide
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by 1/11/95 ~
Comments:
~~~~~ ~
ROUTING FORM
. . .; -;;.93037""
.,>\'1--) .........7.~
.';, ~ \
/,,;,) OJ
If" ~~~..~ ~ ~\
!:J ~.<.,. 4>,,^ 00
N Gb. v(2 v,. co
'" ~ ..
~ ~
O~ Au'::-
6'[ ~"
&llL9LS~'I1\
DATE: December 29, 1994
~
~
1)1
jP6M:
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
cliff SWanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec & EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (Capt. Zoll)
Community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
Current Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
SWeetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Martin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only)
Other
7\"
, c
/
. '\ ~,'"
i;))')
Doua Reid
Environmental Section
SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (IS- 95~17 /FA- ~/DQ 145 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DQ )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR- _/FB- _/DP )
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR-----J
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ_ )
The Project consists of: A zone text amendment to permi t automoti ve
maintenance facilities as a conditional use
use is the C-8, C-$, C-V and C-T zones and
as a permitted use in the I-L zone.
Location: City Wide
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by 1/17/95
,
Comments: ~
tJI~
ROUTING FORM
DATE: December 29, 1994
TO: Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec & EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (Capt. Zoll)
Community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
CUrrent Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union B.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Martin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only)
other
FROM:
Douq Reid
Environmental Section
SUBJECT: Application for Ini tial Study (IS- 95,17 /FA- ~/DQ 145 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DQ )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP)
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR-----J
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ_ )
The Project consists of: A zone text amendment to permi t automat i ve
maintenance facilities as a conditional use
use is the C-B, C-S, C-V and C-T zones and
as a permitted use in the I-L zone.
Location: City Wi de
Please review the document I111d forward to me I111Y comments you have
by 1/1'1/95 ,
Comments:
-)~ /.- /" / '-~~
:/Y7'::;J /
~'~/"')
//
)/,,/;r-
" :.....-.-
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
You arc required 10 file a SICllcmcnt or Disclosure or certain ownership or financial interests, p<Jymcnts, or campaign
""ntriMutions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commis.sion, and
all other om cia I bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
I. Ust the names of all persons having a financial intcrest in the property which is the subject of the application or the
wntract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier.
Bob Cahan
Econo Lube 'N' Tune
2. If any person' identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or partnership. list the names of all individuals owning
more than 10% of thc sharcs in thc corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
Robert Overdevest
Tim O'Brien
Fred \'iaechter
3. If any pcrson' identified pursuant 10 (1) above i, non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person
serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
N/A
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business tran,acted with any memher of thc City staff, Boards, Commissions,
Committees. and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ No..1L If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Plea,e idcntify each and cvery person, including any agents. employees. consultants, or independent wntractors who
you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
Marilvn Ponseqai
Rnh r~hrln
Sherwin Lisker
Ron Grnndnw
Mark Haines
Walt Waaner
6. Have you and/or your omcers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than S I ,000 to a Councilmember in the
current or preceding elcction period? Yes_ No.2L. If yes, state which Councilmember(s):
. . · (NOTE:
Attach additional pa~ as Decc5Sal)') · · ·
. f) //1 n
A.I}) / (/W /'j'
ignature of contractor/a plicant
J
FOR ECONO LUBE "N" TUNE
M~CTTV~ D ~ 90Ni~CCI
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
Date:
Sf'Dtembf'r 19.
1994
. P~rm is tkfitlcd tJ.J: "AllY ;1I,di\,jduo/, finn, Co-pOrf1laShip, jow VC&lUrc, QSSociotiot&, soci4l cwh, frOlmUlI orgonUaliOl&, corporation, estate, D1UI, recci..-er, tyndiccu~
IJW muJ .:vI)' other cowl.t)', dry mid CQUIIlT)', dr)' mUl1idpallry, dirtricl, or oth~ political Albd.i~isiolt. ;" OilY oUt~ group or combinDriOlI ocwlg as 4 WUl. ~