HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1994/12/07 (5)
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of December 7, 1994
Page 1
2,
PUBLIC HEARING:
PCS-95-03: Tentative Subdivision MaD for Parcel R-20.
known as Ventana. Chula Vista Tract 95-03. within the
EastLake Greens Planned Communitv. and submitted bv
Brehm Communities
A, BACKGROUND
Brehm Communities has submitted a Tentative Subdivision Map known as Ventana, Chula Vista
Tract 95-03. in order to subdivide 13,7 acres into 109 single family lots and three open space
lots, The property is designated as Parcel R-20 within the EastLake Greens Planned
Community, and is located on the west side of South Greensview Drive, south of Clubhouse
Drive,
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the project implements and falls
under the purview of previous Negative Declaration IS-94-19, and that no further environmental
review is necessary.
B, RECOMMENDATION
Adopt attached Planning Commission Resolution PCS-95-03 recommending that the City Council
approve the Tentative Subdivision Map in accordance within the findings and subject to the
conditions contained in the attached draft City Council Resolution.
C, DISCUSSION
The tentative map shows 109 single family lots with a minimum lot size of 3,000 sq,ft. The
dwellings will range from 1,690 - 2,100 sq. ft, The lot and unit sizes are similar to those
approved for the Cypress project (Parcel R-14) which is also being developed by Brehm, The
Cypress project, nearing completion, is located at the northwest corner of North Greensview and
Clubhouse Drives,
The lots are arranged around a primary loop street and three cul-de-sacs, with a single access
point from South Greensview Drive. The property adjoins a school site to the north, a park site
and future development area to the west, and property slated for residential development to the
south and across Greensview Drive to the east.
The site is designated on the EastLake Greens SPA Plan for either attached or detached
development at a density range of 5-15 dulac, with a target density of 9.3 dulac and target yield
of 146 units, The project density of just under 8 dulac and project yield of 109 units are
consistent with these SPA limits. The project development is subject to site plan and
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of December 7, 1994
Page 2
architectural review by the Zoning Administrator. The project has been reviewed and given
conditional approval contingent upon approval of the tentative map.
An issue which does not affect this project, but which arose at the last Commission hearing on
an EastLake map, is the status of the affordable housing program for EastLake, As a member
of the Task Force, Commissioner Moot explained at that hearing that the Task Force has been
meeting for several months and has developed a program and identified nine candidate sites for
affordable housing (please see attached exhibit), The program is expected to be forwarded to
Council for adoption soon after the first of the year,
Attachments
Planning Commission Resolution
Draft City Council Resolution
Locator
Tentative Map
EastLake Greens SPA Plan
Potential EastLake Affordable Housing Sites
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Disclosure Statement
(m:\home\planning\pcs9503 .rpt)
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO, PCS-95-03
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR PARCEL R-20, KNOWN AS
VENT ANA, CHULA VISTA TRACT 95-03, WITHIN THE EASTLAKE
GREENS PLANNED COMMUNITY
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative subdivision map was filed with
the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on August 25, 1994, by Brehm
Conununities, and;
WHEREAS, said application requests approval to subdivide Parcel R-20, known as
Ventana, Chula Vista Tract 95-03, within the EastLake Greens Planned Conununity, and;
WHEREAS, the property consists of 13,7 acres located on the west side of South
Greensview Drive, south of Clubhouse Drive, and the proposal is to subdivide the property into
109 single-family lots and three open space lots, and;
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the project
implements and falls under the purview of IS-94-19, and that no further environmental review
is necessary, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on the tentative
map and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners and tenants within
1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and;
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p,m.,
December 7, 1994, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Conunission and said hearing was thereafter closed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
hereby readopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program for
IS-94-l9.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION reconunends
that the City Council adopt the attached draft City Council Resolution approving the Tentative
Subdivision Map for Chula Vista Tract 95-03 in accordance with the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein, and that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City
Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 7th day of December, 1994, by the following Yote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
William C, Tuchscher II, Chairman
ATTEST:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
(m:\home\planning\pcs9503.pcr)
DRAFT
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS
ON THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR PARCEL R-
20, KNOWN AS VENT ANA , CHULA VISTA TRACT 95-03,
MAKING THE NECESSARY FINDINGS AND READOPTING
THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND THE
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR IS-94-19
I. RECITALS
A, Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject matter of this resolution is
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference, and commonly known as Unit 20 of EastLake Greens Tentative
Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 88-3; and for the purpose of general
description herein consists of 13,7 acres located on the west side of South
Greensview Drive, south of Clubhouse Drive within the EastLake Greens
Sectional Planning Area of the EastLake Planned Community ("Project Site");
and,
B, Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on August 25, 1994, Brehm Communities ("Developer") and
EastLake Development Company ("Owner") filed a tentative subdivision map
application with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista and
requested approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for Ventana, Chula Vista
Tract 95-03 (known as Document No, on file with the office of the City
Clerk) in order to subdivide the Project Site into 109 residential lots and three
open space lots ("Project"); and
C, Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of
1) a General Development Plan, EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General
Development Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No, 15198
("GDP"); 2) the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan, previously
adopted by City Council Resolution No, 15199 ("SPA"); and 3) a Tentative
Subdivision Map, previously approved by City Council Resolution No, 15200
("TSM"), Chula Vista Tract 88-3, all approved on July 18, 1989; 4) an Air
Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan
(AQIP); and 5) a Water Conservation Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation
Plan (WCP); both previously approved by City Council Resolution No, 16898 on
November 24, 1992; and 6) a GDP, SPA, TSM, AQIP and WCP amendment
previously approved by City Council Resolution No, 17618 on August 16, 1994;
and
D, Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said
project on December 7, 1994, and voted to recommend that the City
Council approve the Project based upon the findings and subject to the conditions
listed below; and
E, City Council Record of Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista on December 20, 1994, on the Project and to
receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public
testimony with regard to same; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find,
detennine and resolve as follows:
II, PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their
public hearing on this project held on December 7, 1994, and the minutes and resolutions
resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding,
III, MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED;
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; FINDINGS;
APPROVALS
A, Mitigated Negative Declaration
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has reviewed, analyzed and
considered the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19
(known as Document No, C094-180 on file in the Office of the City Clerk) and
comments thereon, the environmental impacts therein identified for this project
and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("Program") (known as
Document No, C094-181 on file in the Office of the City Clerk) thereon prior
to approving the Project. Based on the Initial Study and comments thereon, the
-2-
Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a
significant effect on the environment and thereby readopts the Mitigated Negative
Declaration,
B. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds that the significant
environmental effect(s) identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration will be
reduced to below a level of significance if the mitigation measures in the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are implemented, The Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby readopted to ensure that its
provisions are complied with,
IV, CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepared in accordance
with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines,
and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista,
V, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council finds that Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 reflects the
independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista City Council.
VI. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473,5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map for the Project is in
confonnance with the elements of the City's General Plan, based on the
following:
1. Land Use
The proposed density of 7,95 du/ac is in compliance with the approved
EastLake Greens SPA density range of 5-15 du/ac for the Project site,
2, Circulation
All of the on-site and off-site public streets required to serve the Project
will be constructed or DIF fees paid by the developer in accordance with
the EastLake Greens Public Financing Plan and Development Agreement.
-3-
The public streets within the Project will be designed in accordance with
the City design standards and/or requirements. The adjoining street
system was designed to handle the anticipated flow of traffic from this and
other area projects.
3. Housing
The EastLake Greens SPA Plan area has been conditioned to provide a
minimum of 10% affordable housing including a mix of housing types and
lot sizes for single-family, townhouses, condominium and, eventually,
apartment densities that will provide a wide spectrum of housing prices for
persons of various incomes. The single-family detached residential
housing type proposed within the Project is consistent with the EastLake
Greens SPA Plan.
4. Conservation
The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program for IS-94-19 addressed the goals and policies of the
Conservation Element of the General Plan and found the development of
the Project Site to be consistent with these goals and policies.
5. Parks and Recreation, Open Space
The Project Site is located within the EastLake Greens SPA Plan area.
The EastLake Greens SPA Plan provides public parks, trails and open
space consistent with City policies.
6. Seismic Safety
The Project is in conformance with the goals and policies of the Seismic
Element of the General Plan for this site.
7. Safety
The Fire Department and other emergency service agencies have reviewed
the Project for conformance with City safety policies and have determined
that it meets the City Threshold Standards for emergency services.
-4-
8. Noise
Noise mitigation measures included in the Environmental Impact Report
SEIR-86-04 and Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 adequately
address the noise policy of the General Plan. All dwelling units within the
project will be required to be designed so as to not exceed the interior
noise level of 45 dBA. Additionally, all exterior private open space will
be shielded by a combination of earth, berm, wall, and/or buildings to
achieve a 65 dBA noise level for outside private areas.
9. Scenic Highway
The Project Site is not located along a designated scenic highway, but will
provide a 10 ft. wide landscape buffer and decorative wall along
Greensview Drive in order to enhance the appearance of the Project from
the street.
The project, as conditioned, will be required to provide a landscape buffer
in conformance with landform grading and scenic highway principles of
the General Plan.
10. Bicycle Routes
Bicycle lanes have been incorporated within the EastLake Greens Planned
Community area design and are presently in use. The public streets
within the project are of adequate width to accommodate bicycle travel
within the interior of the subdivision.
11. Public Buildings
No public buildings are proposed on the project site. The project IS
subject to RCT fees prior to issuance of building permits.
B. Pursuant to Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Council certifies
that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the
region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the
residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources.
C. The configuration, orientation and topography of the site partially allows for the
optimum siting of lots for passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities as
required by Government Code Section 66473.1.
-5-
D. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal
conforms to all standards established by the City for such projects.
E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein
contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact
created by the Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Project
subject to the general and special conditions set forth below.
VIII. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The approval of the Project which is stated to be conditioned on "General Conditions"
is hereby conditioned as follows:
A. Project Site is Improved with Project
Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site with the
Project as described in Tentative Subdivision Map Chula Vista Tract 95-03 and
the Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 except as modified by this
Resolution.
B. Implement Mitigation Measures
Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all
mitigation measures pertaining to the Project identified in the Final Supplemental
Impact Report for Eastlake Greens FEIR-86-04 and Mitigated Negative
Declaration IS-94-19.
C. Implement the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of all portions of
IS-94-19 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pertaining to the Project.
D. Implement previously adopted conditions of approval pertinent to project.
Unless otherwise conditioned, developer shall comply with all unfulfilled
conditions of approval of !he EasILake Greens Tentative Map, Chula Vista TracI
88-3 established by Resolution No. 15200 approved by Council on July 18, 1989,
and shall remain in compliance with and implement the terms, conditions and
provisions of Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area, Eastlake Greens Planned
Community District Regulations, !he Eastlake Greens Development Agreement,
-6-
the Water Conservation Plan and the Air Quality Plan, Design Guidelines and the
Public Facilities Financing Plan.
E. Implement Public Facilities Financing Plan
Developer shall install public facilities in accordance with the Eastlake Greens
Public Facilities Financing Plan as amended or as required by the City Engineer
to meet threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista. The City
Engineer and Planning Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of
improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision.
F. Project Phasing
If phasing is proposed within an individual map or through multiple final maps,
submit and obtain approval for a development phasing plan by the City Engineer
and Director of Planning prior to approval of any final map. Improvements,
facilities and dedications to be provided with each phase or unit of development
shall be as determined by the City Engineer and Director of Planing. The City
reserves the right to condition approval of each final map with the requirement
to provide said improvements, facilities and/or dedications as necessary to provide
adequate circulation and to meet the requirements of police and fire departments.
The City Engineer and Planning Director may, at their discretion, modify the
sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such
a revision.
G. Annexation
Annex all property within the proposed subdivision boundary of each final map
to the City of Chula Vista from the County of San Diego prior to approval of
each map.
H. Design Review Approval
The final map shall comply with all applicable plans and conditions approved with
DRC-95-l6.
IX. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Prior to approval of the final map unless otherwise indicated, the developer shall:
-7-
STREETS. RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND IMPROVEMENTS
1. Design, construct and dedicate right of way for all streets to meet the City
standards for residential streets, or as approved by the City Engineer. Submit
improvement plans for approval by the City Engineer detailing !he horizontal and
vertical alignment of said streets.
2. Guarantee the construction of all improvements (streets, sewers, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc) deemed necessary to provide service to the subject
subdivision in accordance with City standards.
3. Design streets to meet 250' minimum distance between centerline intersections or
as approved by the City Engineer.
4. The waivers requested on the tentative map for the following are hereby granted:
a) cui de sacs
b) tangent length between Station 28 and Station 30
c) knuckles
d) driveway separation from PCR to be 4 feet minimum
5. Present written verification to the City Engineer from Otay Water District that the
subdivision will be provided adequate water service and long term water storage
facilities.
6. Design all residential streets with 200 ft. minimum curve radii.
7. Obtain and grant to the City easements for the maintenance of the proposed sewer
and storm drain between !he northerly subdivision boundary and the point of
connection to !he existing facilities. Said easements shall be 10' wide minimum.
GRADING
8. Submit and obtain approval by the City Engineer for final grading plans.
9. Provide an updated soils report or an addendum to !he original document prepared
by a registered engineer, as required by the City Engineer.
10. Submit and obtain approval by the City Engineer for an erosion and sedimentation
control plan toge!her with grading plans.
11. Submit a list of proposed lots indicating whether the structure will be located on
fill, cut, or a transition between the two situations.
-8-
AGREEMENTS
12. Enter into an agreement with the City whereby:
a. The developer agrees !he City may withhold building permits for any units
in the subject subdivision if anyone of the following occur:
(I) Regional development threshold limits set by the East Chula Vista
Transportation Phasing Plan have been reached.
(2) Traffic volumes, levels of service, public utilities and/or services
exceed !he adopted City Ihreshold standards.
b. The developer agrees that the City may withhold building permits for any
of the proposed development if the required public facilities, as identified
in the PFFP or as amended or otherwise conditioned have not been
completed or constructed to satisfaction of the City. The developer may
propose changes in the timing and sequencing of development and the
construction of improvements affected. In such case, the PFFP may be
amended as approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer.
13. Agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers
and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its
agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by
!he City, including approval by its Planning Commission, City Council or any
approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to !his subdivision
pursuant to Section 66499.37 of !he Map Act provided !he City promptly notifies
the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that
the City fully cooperates in the defense.
14. Agree to hold the City harmless from any liability for erosion, siltation or
increase flow of drainage resulting from this project.
15. Agree to insure that all franchised cable television companies ("Cable Company")
are permitted equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television
service to each lot within the subdivision. Restrict access to the conduit to only
those franchised cable television companies who are, and remain in compliance
with, all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are in further
compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating
and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been,
or may from time to time be issued by the City of Chula Vista.
-9-
OPEN SPACE/ASSESSMENTS
16. Pay additional fees on a fair-share basis into Assessment District Numbers 90-3,
91-1 and other applicable assessment districts due to a change in units approved
subsequent to District formation as determined by the City Engineer.
17. Pay all costs associated with apportionment of assessments for all City assessment
districts as a result of subdivision of lands within the boundary. Request
apportionment and provide a deposit to the City estimated at $40/unit/district to
cover costs.
18. Prepare a disclosure form to be signed by the home buyer acknowledging that
additional fees have been paid into the Assessment District or the Transportation
DIF Fund, and that these additional fees are reflected in the purchase price of the
home for those units which have a density change from that indicated in the
assessment district's Engineer's Report. Submit disclosure form for the approval
of the City Engineer.
19. Request annexation into EastLake Maintenance District #1 of all areas within the
tentative map boundary not currently included in the district prior to approval of
the first final map which includes said areas. Deposit $3,000 to initiate
annexation proceedings. Pay all costs of proceedings.
MISCELLANEOUS
20. Tie the boundary of the subdivision to the California System -Zone VI (1983).
21. Submit copies of Final Maps in a digital format such as (DXF) graphic file prior
to approval of each Final Map. Provide computer aided Design (CAD) copy of
the Final Map based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and submit the
information in accordance with the City Guidelines for Digital Submittal in
duplicate on 5-1/2 HD floppy disk prior to the approval of each Final Map.
X. CODE REQUIREMENT REMINDERS
1. Comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code.
Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the
provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision
Ordinance and Subdivision Manual.
2. Underground all utilities within the subdivision in accordance with Municipal
Code requirements.
-10-
3. Satisfy the requirement to pay the Transportation Development Impact Fees
(TDIF) prior to final map approval if the fee is financed through an assessment
district or pay the TDIF prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Pay the following fees in accordance with the City Code and Council Policy:
a. The Transportation and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees.
b. Signal Participation Fees.
c. All applicable sewer fees, including but not limited to sewer connection
fees.
d. Interim Pre-SR-125 impact fee (effective January 1, 1995).
e. Telegraph Canyon Sewer Pumped Flows Development Impact Fees
f. Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Fee
5. Pay the amount of applicable fees in effect at the time of issuance of building
permits. The developer is advised that fees periodically change, and that it is the
developer's responsibility to contact the appropriate City department or
government agency to ascertain the amount of a given fee due to the time of
collection.
6. Required fire hydrants must be installed and operable prior to delivery of any
combustible construction materials.
7. If any part of the development will be adjacent to an open space area, particularly
canyon rims, a plan for brush management and fire resistive landscaping must be
submitted.
XI. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation
to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
-11-
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval
of this Resolution.
XII. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of
Determination and file the same with the County Clerk.
XIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent
upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated;
and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined
by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this
resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect
ab initio.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
(f: \home\planning\ ventana. ccr)
-12-
I
"'{ R.'.
I
s.,
:.~
I
I
~ '.2
$:
po.,
-----
PROJECT
LOCATION
EXHIBIT A
C HULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR APPLICANT: VENTANA @ EASTLAKE PROJECT OESCRIPTlON:
GREENS SUBDMSION VENTANA
C) ADDRESS: SOUTH GREENVIEW DRIVE Request: The development proposal consists
of the construction of 109 single family
SCALE: FILE NUMBER: dwellings on 13.7 acres
NORTH NONE PCS - 95 - 03
LOCATOR
:'.~
I
I
PROJECT
LOCATION
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR APPLICANT: VENTANA @ EASTLAKE PROJECT OESCRIPTlON:
GREENS SUBDMSION VENTANA
C) ADDRESS: SOUTH GREENVIEW DRIVE Request: The development proposal consists
of the construction of 109 single family
SCALE: FILE NUMBER: dwellings on 13.7 acres
NORTH NONE PCS - 95 - 03
TENTATIVE MAP
I
,
,
I
!
.
I
I
,
,
! I
I ,
'I'
': h
~il ,!':
~.. ~Ii~
~ 0-
~ 5 ~
;h.
; aim.
~ r H ~ ;;
;11
1'1
'(
,h~
:!,I
iJi
iii~
III' !!
11'~i! ii'
III "t
";r ~ :; ~ ~ i
I. I ~~ II II I! II I
"I!! ~11,lliiililllll!i I 'Ibl nllii lid
", ~ \I'" 1IIIIIIh i.illlllilli
I ,~" 'r'l I ~. I 'Ii,'
I, - ~IJIJ, !! Ga ,I (, i,' I!': ,
I ~ III,.' I I IJ 'T ~ I II i
1'111' I ;~ I 1,'1'
o..~
~!A:i
'"=~
~ <:J CI)
i:: 1&1 ~
~~ ::;:
.,.;~ !IiO
;it~ i
~ CI)~~
.... i:i 8
~.... ;Ii
~~ ifi
u~
~
...~
~;it
ct:~
;!
-
~
~-,~:'-
~:~~
~\"'io. ......~~
\. ~~:\
.,
\ r---~~--
\--\ ~;I~ :~'-
I, \ 'I' ';
II, \ 'J!~ ~~;
i;::t ..,,"
i! I
" I
! Ii i
I! lI:d
'I ,II.. rp I
III. ' nl!. I I !:! II
n!! I iI ~W i II q i : II! ,
Uj'i i illll;!I! I'! i ;!III
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~i! ! ! : ! ! d !! !!I! !
I
,
.
I
I
,
,
I.:
"II I
~I d
'II'"
i, Iii""
'Ii h.~
! Iii ~
e ..I.
i ~~.; '-:
! '
~'
, ,
>,
{
,
\ij!';::'
~~':'
":t;';
~ ~ ~~
,
!
.
.
I
,
I,
hi
ill
Iii
"
Ii!
'"
,Ii
ill
\ ,,\/
r ",'
j '----1 ;.t~l
IllT'r-:-i~.
II '. . ~"!
I 00-"",
., I 1ii
,I _ii,
. '",,1,
",
~i""f: I
'I _/i
!lJ=Y
_/ ~ 1\
~i \':,.
/1
"' ., ~
,-
/ ---t~.
.
( 1
I 1
I · -
~
,
!,-
t~~=6
1\
~
.
EASTLAKE GREENS SPA PLAN
Iii:
I)ooooooooooooooo~~~~~~~~~~oo~
~ Iii .
C'5 . O-NC').ll1cg....CD~O_NC")...ltHCp...CI J
~ ~l :ti~;~~~~~:t:t:t:t:t:t:t:t:t:tiiiiiiiii J
_ a:
CJ)~~" ~
,~ :~
~; ...~
, I '
l%~ . ~
r ci;
, I
- t (
. 1
\
z
<(
....J
a..
z
o
-
t:(
N
-
....J
i=
::>
It i
.O~.~~O~~~~~N~~~.~~~O~.~~O.O ~
~.OOO.~~...~.CDCD._.~.N._.~..CD ....
--- N - N ----N ~
E-' i C':
..
.~ I :E
i '~I~I~ 'c
'i:!-'
~ \]jl ~
.... ~. ~
II) 31
'"
.1/
..;~
1/ 1/ I, !
J OMCDNO-QOIl100_OCDMom..._ '"
mN.mO~M~.MN~~~~.~ci~ ~ M
-- ...-- - !CD . II> 'jI
II)
,! J UU 1'1
.. !lllr"Td
'd ~~J .~ uu ! . la 1
~~tjj. . ! !!!!!!!~. JI
~~ iii JP ~
'0 ;g
'0 ~I __N -N~.~~~ I ti j=' ~
~ I . ~~";''':'";''':''?~~,;,~,;,~,;,~~
I ~0~~~~~O 0 0 .~
c:
0 0:
z
1/
........OMcg-CDmC').0Il1Mll1cgm~CDCDMO_MNIl11l10CD ~
NN~..~~~~~~..~~~"".O~NMM~d...
... _..._ ... CI
..
1/
........CDOO......Il1.CDMcg.OIl1p...mm....OCDCDO...C')O_ _
~~~~~~g!~~:~~::g~m~~gg~~~~mG ~
.
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111
111111111111111_____________________111_
ooooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~
:! ~ LU:::2 .~
N
ci; N
ci; ,;,
~ f~
~ SW5
,;,
~wl~
~'-:"""'-'-"{~~ ~<
lf1(!)
~ ! t .-J
~
. \ ~
POTENTIAL EASTLAKE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING SITES
POTENTIAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING SITES
f'
r;.~
"'-~
PHASEIAREA
c.
PHASE II AREA
LEGEND
o Potential Affordable Housing Sites
PHASE I AREA
. . .. PHASE II AREA
-15-
~
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 18-94-19
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigated Negal~ve Declaratio
r>"tp-/
PROJECT NAME: Modification to the EastLake Greens GDP/SPA and the fonnation
of an Assessment District for various public improvcmcnts
PROJECT LOCATION: South of Otay Lakes Road between EastLakc Parkway and Hunte
Parkway
PROJECT APPLICANT: Eastiake Developmcnt Company
CASE NO: IS-94-19
DATE: February 28, 1994
A. Proiect Setting
The project site located south of Otay Lakes Road between EastLake Parkway and Hunte
Parkway and this general vicinity (Eastlake and Otay Ranch) do not involve any substantial
soil or any geotechnical hazards that would impact the proposed project.
The project is located within the San Diego air basin which is an air quality lion-attainment
basin. The project includes a 97 dwelling unit increase because of the expansion in land
area of the Greens SPA. This will not result in a substantial increase in emission into the
air basin or any substantial degradation in air quality.
However, because the increase in the projected units is more than SO, compliance with the
City requirement for an Air Quality Improvement Plan must be met. Thus, this less-than-
significant impact will be further reduced.
The project site involves the Telegraph Canyon Creek, Poggi Canyon Creek and Salt Creek
drainage basins. Future regional facilities in these basins may nee4 additional cumulative
capacities to serve the 22.7 additional acres being added to the SPA boundary but the
impacts of this project would not be significant. These drainage courses do not enter any
potable water sources nor are they a significant source of any ground water.
This property has been used for agricultural pwposes for many decadcs and is void of any
significant vcgetation or animal life. The project could affect raptor habitats but given the
limited acreage this is not significant.
There are various streets in thc project area which havc traffic volumes that may result n
adverse noise levels. Once precise pad clevations n:lativc to street clcvations are known,
specific mitigation will be identified and implemented. This residential project will not
result in any significant sources of light or glare.
The project as proposed is consistent with thc othet low-medium densitics adjacent to and
in the vicinity of the project site and the population lcvels are consistent with the project
area.
Public facilities and services including transportation are availablc and adequate to ,~~ft..
the project site and vicinity. ==--'_-=
-
city of chula vi.ta planning department 01Y OF
environmental review ..ction. OiUIA VISTA
\
The underlying geological strata on the project site possess a high potential for significant
paleontological resources. Those areas which have been graded have been monitored and
any significant resources recovered. This monitoring will continue in the currently non-
graded areas.
Mitigation of any potential cultural resources on the project site was previously
implemented.
.
B. Proiect DescriDtion
General DescriDtion
The project is an amendment to the adopted Eastlake I General Development Plan (GDP),
which includes EastLake Greens; an amendment to the adopted Eastlake Greens SPA Plan
(SPA) and Tentative Tract Map; and the annexation of approximately 23 acres to the City
of Chula Vista. The amendments to the GDP and Tentative Tract Map are intended to
reflect those changes proposed in the SPA Plan. The changes in the SPA Plan are of the
following two categories:
1. Amending the GDP/SPA to include those parcels of the recent Land Swap General
Plan Amendment east of the SDG&E transmission easement (expansion of Parcels
R-lO, R-20, and R-23 for 97 additional units).
2. Transfers of units within the existing SPA boundary to reflect refmements with no
net increase of density.
3. The formation of an Assessment District to (94-1 Eastlake II) for the installation
of public facilities to serve the project.
Included is Table 1, the Adopted Site Utilization Plan and Table 2 which summarizes the
proposed residential changes.
DescriDtion of Land SwaD Area Amendment
Only those areas east of the transmission easement area included in this amendment. The
balance of the Land Swap Area (between the Otay Ranch and Eastlake), which was
recently the subject of a General Plan Amendment, will be covered by a separate
amendment. The purpose of including the areas in this proposed amendment separately is
because they are logical expansions of existing parcels within the Eastlake Greens SPA
plan. The parcels that are expanded by the recent GPA include Parcels R-I0, R-20 and R-
23. Upon favorable action, these areas are proposed to be annexed to the City of Chula
Vista. Following is a description of each of these parcels:
R-IO: The realignment of Orange Avenue to the south expanded
this parcel's boundary. These expanded areas were designated Low-
Medium Density on the General Plan. The mid-point of tile density
range (4.5 dulac) is being proposed. The total increase for this
parcel is 79 du (67 du in the Land Swap Area and 12 du in areas
.previously indicated as Orange AvenueIFuture Urban).
WPC F:\H0ME\PLANNINa.1736~
Page 2
~ABLE 1
EastLake Greens site utilization Plan
Existinq Residential Land Us. statistics
Parcel Density Acres Tarqet Tarqet
Number Ranae Densitv Units
R-l 0-5 19.7 2.7 54
R-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40
R-3 0-5 21.8 3.8 83
R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104
R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105
R-6 0-5 17.4 5.0 88
R-7 5-15 10.7 6.0 65
R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 96
R-9 5-15 8.5 5.3 45
R-10 '5-15 27.9 6.0 167
R-l1 5-15 14.6 6.3 92
R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 93
R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142
R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 84
R-15 5-15 11.6 7.6 88
R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83
R-17 5-15 29.7 7.2 214
R-18 5-15 9.9 8.8 87
R-19 5-15 14.9 10.6 158
R-20 5-15 13.6 12.0 164
R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120
R-22 5-15 10.8 13.5 146
R-23 5-15 13.7 15.0 205
R-24 15-25 5.0 10.0 50
R-25 15-25 7.4 10.0 74
R-26* 15-25 13.3 4.5 60
R-27* 25+ 8.9 4.5 40
R-28* 25+ 1).1 eI.!5 27
'1'O'lAL 412.4 ac 2774 du
*Xnterim Designation
,.
..
\
~ABLE 2
EastLake Greens site utilization Plan
Proposed Residential Land U.e statistice
Parcel Density Acres ~arqet ~arqet I:ncrease(+)
Humber Ranae Densitv units Decre&se(-\
R-l 0-5 19.7 2.7 54 0
R-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40 0
R-3 0-5 21.8 4.7 102 +19
R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104 0
R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105 0
R-6 5-15 17.4 5.1 88 0
R-7 5-15 10.7 5.6 60 -5
R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 96 0
R-9* 5-15 8.5 5.3 45 0
R-10 5-15 45.4 5.4 246 +79
R-11 5-15 14.6 6.0 87 -5
R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 93 0
R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142 0
R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 86 +2
R-15 5-15 11.6 6.5 65 -23
R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83 0
R-17 5-15 "29.7 7.2 214 0
R-18 5-15 9.9 8.8 87 0
R-19 5-15 14.9 10.6 158 0
R-20 5-15 15.7 9.2 153 +11
R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120 0
R-22 5-15 10.8 13.1 141 -5
R-23 5-15 15.8 13.5 214 +9
R-24 5-15 5.0 10.0 46 -4
R-25 5-15 7.4 10.0 78 +4
R-26* 5-15 13.3 4.5 60. 0
R-27 0-5 8.9 4.9 44 +4
R-2B 5-15 6.1 9.8- 1)0 +33
wrAL 434.1 ac 6.6 2871 du +97
*InteriJII Designation: parcel subject ~ ~utur. SPA Amendment
to be consistent with the General Plan.
1-11-94
(
R-20: This parcel is expanded by a 2.1 acre triangle adjacent to the
SDG&E casement The new area is computed at the mid-point of
the Low-Medium density range (4.5 dulac). A reduction is proposed
for the parcel as a whole to reflect current planning/marketing.
R-23: This parcel is identical to the changes for R-20, except that
no decrease in the density is proposed. A net increase of 9 units are
proposed for this 2.1 acre addition to the SPA.
A total increase of 22.7 acres and 97 du are included in these three parcels.
DescriDtion of Density Transfers
This amendment includes density transfers within the existing SPA boundary to reflect
current planning/marketing. These changes do not increase the number of units (2774 du)
previously adopted. Following is a summary of the density transfers. Refer also to Table
2 for a composite of both density transfers and additions resulting from the additional Land
Swap Areas.
R-3
R-7
R-ll
R-14
R-15
R-20
R-22
R-24
R-25
R-27
R-28
DU Increase DU Decrease
+19
-5
-5
+2
-23
-20
-5
-4
+4
+4
+33
+62 -62
Parcel Number
TOTAL
DescriDtion of Assessment District Work
The general description of work to be funded by Assessment District 94-1 consists of the
following:
1. Street improvements consisting of grading, base, paving, gutter, sidewa1k, street
lighting and landscaping within the following rights-of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400
L.F., Phase 1).
b. South Greensview Drive from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400
L.F., Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920
L.F., Phase 3).
WPC F,\HOME\PLANNING\I736.94
Page 3
2.
Utilities and underground improvements consisting of potable water facilities, stann
drain facilities, sewer facilities, reclaimed water facilities, electric facilities,
telephone facilities, gas facilities, television facilities as appropriate by applicable
state and federal statutes within the following rights-of-way:
(
a. South Greensview Drive from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400
L.F., Phase 1).
b. South Greensview Drive from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400
L.F., Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920
L.F., Phase 3).
3. D IF funded street improvements consisting of grading, stann drain, base, paving,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, street lighting, landscaping and street
monumentation within the following rights-of-way:
a. Hunte Parkway from Clubhouse Drive to South Greensview Drive (2,300
L.F., Phase 2).
4. DIF funded street and underground improvements consisting of grading, and stann
drain improvements within the following rights-of-way:
a. Hunte Parkway from South Greensview to Orange Avenue (1,270 L.F.,
Phase 2).
b. Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to the SDG&E easement (3,500 L.F.,
Phase 2).
Discretionarv Actions Associated (but not limited to) the Proiect Area
1. General Development Plan Amendment
2. Sectional Area Plan (SPA) Amendment
3. Modification to the Eastlake Greens Site Utilization Plan
4. Establishment of District 94-1
5. Annexation
6. Tentative Subdivision Map
7. Design Review
C. ComDatibilitv with ZoniDlz and Plans
The project is consistent with the overall General Plan. The project involves an
amendment to the more specific land use regulations of the Eastlake Greens General
Development Plan (GDP) and Sectional Planning Area Plan (SPA).
D. Identification of Environmental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including the attached
Environmental Checklist Fonn) determined that the proposed project could have one or
WPC F:\IIOME\PLANNINOII736.94
Page 4
more significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in the project design and/or
specific mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce these effects to a level below
significant. With project revisions and/or mitigation, no significant environmental effects
will occur, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070
of the State CEQA Guidelines. Specific mitigation measures are set forth in the Mitigation
Monitoring Program which is attached as Attachment "A".
The following impacts are those that were detennined to be potentially significant and are
required to be mitigated to a level below significant A discussion of each of these
potentially significant but mitigatable impacts ftom the proposed project follows.
Acoustics
The Initial Study has noted that traffic volume on roadways in and adjacent to the project
site could increase ambient noise to an unacceptable level.
E. Mitil:ation necessary to avoid silmificant effects
Specific project mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially significant
environmental impacts identified in the initial study for this project to a level below
significant.Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and have
been made conditions of project approval, as well as requirements of the attached
Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment "A").
At the time of consideration 'of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review
Supplemental Acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista
General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation of
roadways and residential development pads will be available. With this infonnation, it will
be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation
measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65 exterior dBA (CNEL).
These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast and must
validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
F. Consultation
1. Individuals and Oreanizations
City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Bob Sennett, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building &. Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Crime Prevention, MaryJane Diosdada
Marty Schmidt, Parks &. Recreation Dept
Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney
WPC F:IIIOME\PLANNlNCN 736.9<1 Page S
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent: Gary Cinti
Cinti Land Planning
3625 Midway Dr., #292
San Diego, CA 9211 0
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989)
Chula Vista Municipal Code
Letter dated February 9, 1994 from Bruce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager,
EastLakeDevelopment Co. regarding sewage generation in sewage basins,
improvements and fmancing
Letter dated February 7, 1994, Dennis C. Bowling, Director Water Resources
Division, Rick Engineering Co., regarding the adequacy of drainage systems
Letter dated February 18, 1994, Andy Schlaefli, Vice President Urban Systems
Associates, Inc. regarding the adequacy of the Transportation Circulation System
3. Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study as well as
any comments on the Initial Study and this Mitigated Negative Declaration, and
reflects the independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information
regarding the environmental review of the project is available from the Chula Vista
Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
AL REVIEW COORDINATOR
ENVIRO
EN 6 (Rev. 5/93)
WPC F,\HOME\I'LANNINGl1736.94
Poge 6
Attachment A
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
MITIGATION MEASURE
At the time of Consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or
Design Review Supplemental Acoustical Reports will be prepared
for projects adjacent to Chula vista General Plan Circulation
Element Roadways. At that time, the precise elevation of
roadways and residential development pads will be available.
With this information, it will be feasible to make an accurate
forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation
measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65
exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
MONITORING REOUIREMENT
Prior to granting a tentative subdivision map or design review
approval. a noise study forecasting noise levels and the
appropriate measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an
acceptable exterior 65 dBA CNEL is required.
11>
~
~
5-1
.....
......
.....
....c.\A...
.....
......
......
.....
......
.....
0$,2
....
.....
:+\"2!i..
.....
......
.....
0$.,
5-2
I
,
i
,
PQ.I
~
AAfA OF DENSI1Y TRANSFER
.
ADDED TO SPA BOUNDARY
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
iC) APPLICANT: Eastlake Development CO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
. EASTLAKE GREENS
ADDRESS: 900 Lane Avenue General Development Plan Amendment
SCALE: FilE NUMBER: and SPA Amendment
l ~RTH NO SCALE 18-94-19
Case No. 15-94-19
APPENDIX 1
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
Background
1. Name of Proponent: Eastlake DevelO1!ment Co.
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 900 Lane Ave.. Suite 100.
Chula Vista. CA 91913
3. Date of Checklist: Februarv 24. 1994
4. Name of Proposal: Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment
s. Initial Study Number: 1S-94-l9
Environmental Impacts
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE ~
a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructures? J:I J:I .
b. Disruptions. displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? [] . []
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief featureS? J:I . J:I
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any wrlque geologic or physical featureS? [] [] .
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
,oils, either on or off the site? J:I . J:I
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands. or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or Jake? [] [] .
g. Exposure of people or propertY to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides. ground failure. or similar hazards? [] [] .
Plie 7
WPCF:~!N7)6.!>4
g.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
o
o
.
Comments:
The project is proposed for an urbanizing area of eastern Chula Vista. There have no fmding
of significant problems in the areas of geology soils or erosion. Generalized and more
specific substantiation of the geotechnical and soil suitability of the project site is in the City
of Chula Vista General Plan FEIR (1989), EastLake FEIR (1982), EastLake SPA I FEIR
(1985), Eastlake Greens SPA & EastLake Trails Prezone & Annexation FSEIR (1989), and
Otay Ranch FPEIR (1993), and other more specific geological and soils reports on file with
the City of Chula Vista Public Works Department, Engineering Division.
There will be some modification of existing topography, however, this is considered very
minor and not significant given the lack of any significant topographic features.
2.
Air. Will the proposal result in:
~ MAYBE 1:ill
a.
Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
o
o
.
b.
The creation of objectionable odors?
o
o
.
c.
Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
o
o
.
Comments:
The San Diego air basin is a non-attainment air basin. The proposed project would
result in an increase of 97 units within the Eastlake Greens SPA. The emissions
from the traffic and energy generation associated with this project is not significant
when considering the overall generation of emissions. On a cumulative basis, the
emissions from this project are so minimal they are not cumulatively significant.
3. Water. Will the Proposal result in: ~ MAYBE 1:ill
a. Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters? 0 0 .
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoff] 0 . 0
c. Alterations to the course or flow or
flood waters? 0 0 .
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1736.94
Page 8
e. Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to temperarure,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity? [] [] .
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of
flow of ground waters? C C .
g. O1ange in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception of
an aquifer by cuts or excavations? C C .
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies? C [] .
i. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or
tidal waves'? C [] .
Comments:
The project site' and vicinity do not involve any affected marine or fresh water areas, flood
waters, water bodies, or known ground water. Thcre will be a minor change in absorption
rate which will result in minor-less-than-significant change in JU/loff (see letter from Dennis
C. Bowling dated 2(7/94).
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: m ~YBE Jill
a. O1ange in the diversity of species, or
number of any species of plants (including
tteeS, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic
plants)'? C C .
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants? D C .
c. Introduction of new species of plants into
into an area, or in a baIrier to the nonna!
replenishment of existing species? C C .
d. Reduction in IIC!'C8gC of any agricu1tura1
crop? C D .
Comments:
The project site has been used for agricu1tura1 purposes for decades and portions are now
graded ilnd some areas havc been developed (transfer area). This gencral area is used as
Raptor territory, however, with only a 22.7 acre increase in SPA~, this is not significant.
Page 9
wpcF:~O\I736.94
S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
L Qlange in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of lOirnals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)'? [] [] .
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of lOirnals'? [] [] .
c. Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals'? .[] [] .
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat'? [] [] .
Comments:
The project site has been used for agricultural purposes for decades and portions are now
graded and some areas have been developed (transfer area). This general area is used as
Raptor territory, however, with only a 22.7 acre increase in SPA size, this is not significant.
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: m. MAYBE ~
L Increases in existing noise levels'? [] [] .
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels'? [] . []
Comments:
Traffic volumes on roadways in and adjacent to the project site could inaease ambient
noise to an unacceptable level. At the time of consideration of a Tentative
Subdivision Map or Design Review, supplementalacoustica1 reports will be prepared
for projects adjacent to O1ula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At
that time the precise elevation of roadways and residential development pads. With
this information it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise Jevds and
the Ikyyropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels and the
appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 6S
exterior dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout
traffic forecast and must validate the achievement of the 6S exterior dBA (CNEL)
. It8Ddani
,"
... 10
WI'C~O\I736.P4
7.
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
new light or glare?
m. MAYBE NO
[J [J .
Comments:
This is primarily a residential project that will not produce any significant new light or glare.
If there are any unique ,ources proposed or established. they will be regulated through the
pc:Ifonnance standards in the Municipal Code.
8.
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
m MAYBE 1m
[J
[J
.
Comments:
The proposed project is in a planned community which is internally cmsistent that
assures land use compatibility. The project expansion areas are within logical
boundaries (the SDG&E transmission lines and East Orange Avenue). The overall
external compatibility has been assured through coordination with the adjacent Otay
Ranch. Otay Water District facilities and SR 125 alignmenL
9.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
m. MAYBE NO
a.
Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
[J
[J
.
Comments:
There are no other natural resources such as sand and gravel on site which would be
impacted by the proposed project.
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
YES MAYBE 1m
a.
A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to oil. pesticides. chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions'?
[J
[J
.
b.
Possible inteIference with 811 emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
[J
[J
.
Comments:
Given the residential character of the project there will be no involvement of hazardous
materials above that typical of a residential land use. The project will provide adequate.
circulation in the case of the need for an evacuation or response plan.
,.
1'1&011
Wl'CF:~CN736.!04
(
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human
population or an area?
m. MAYBE !ill
[J
[J
.
Conunents:
The distribution, density and growth of housing and population in this project are consistent
with planning for this area.
12. Housine. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or create a demand for additional
housing?
m. MAYBE !ill
[J
[J
.
Conunents:
The distribution, density and growth of housing and population in this project are consistent
with planning for this area. The project will satisfy rather than create housing demands in
this area.
13. TransportationlCirculation. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE !ill
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement? [J [J .
b. Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking? [J [J .
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? [J [J .
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? [J [J .
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air
traffic? [J [J .
f. In~ase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? [J [J .
g. A "large project" under the Congestion
Management Program? (An equivalent of
2400 or more average daily vehicle trips
or 200 or more peak.hour vehicle trips). [J [J .
Comments:
The project will not result in any significant impact to transportation/cUt:u1ation/lraffic (see
memo from Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer, dated 2121194. and Jetter from Andy
Schlaefli. Vice President, Urban Systems Associates, dated 2118194).
WI'C~CN736S4 Page 12
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
{ governmental services in any of the following areas:
m. MAYBE :ill
a. Fire protection'? See page 6 of Appendix m of the [] [] .
Initial Study (City Data Sheet-Fire Dept.) and
16 Thresholds a. Fire/EMS below.
b. Police protection'? See comments in Chula Vista Police
Dept. Crime Prevention Unit, Plan Review recommendation
dated 2/4194 and 16 Thresholds b. [] [] .
c. Schools'? EastLake Development Co. has made the Eastlake
projects participate in Community Facilities Districts
in the Sweetwater Union High School District, and the
Chula Vista Elementary School District to provide adequate
school services in the area. [] [] .
d. Parks or other recreational facilities'?
The project will be required to provide adequate
community and neighborhood parks to serve the
population of the project. See Initial Study.
Appendix m. Parks & Recreation Dept.. page 7.
Also see 19 Recreation below. [] [] .
e. Libraries'? The City of Chula Vista currently operates
a library at the campus of the East1alce High School
during the hours the school library is not in operation.
On a longer tenn basis. there is a requirement for a library
site at Eastlake Village and a development impact fee to
finance the facility. [] [] .
f. Maintenance of public facilities. including
roads'? There will be no substantial or unique impact on
the maintenance of anv public facility as a result of the
minimal increase in usage due to this project. [] [] .
g. Other governmental services'? Other governmental Bgencies
were notified and contacted during the Initial Study;
DO other potential impacts were identified. [] [] .
IS. EDer'IY. Will the proposal result in: m. MAYBE :ill
a. Use of substantial 1II1I0000t of fuel or
energy'? [] [] .
WPC 1':'BJME'a,ANNI0\1736.9oI
Paae 13
b.
Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources or energy, or require
the development of new ,ources of
energy?
[J
[J
.
Conunents:
The project would result in a minor increase in energy requirements typical of a
primarily residential project. This will not resuh in a substantial use of fuel or energy
nor Dew sources of energy.
16. Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely impact
the City's Threshold Standards?
YES MAYBE 1m
[J [J .
Conunents:
As described below, the proposed project does not adveISely impact any of the seven
Threshold Standards.
A. FirelEMS
The Threshold Standards requiIes that fire and medical units must be able to respond
to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85 % of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in
75% of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard
will be met, since the neaIelt fire station is one mile away and would be associated
with a 3 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold
Standard.
See Appendix m to the Initial Study, page #6.
B. Police
The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1
calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority
1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls
within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 cal1s
of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
See comments in Chula Vista Police Department Crime PJevention Unit, Plan Review
Recommendation dated 2/4/94.
C. Traffic
The Threshold Standards require that all interseCtions must operate at a Level of
Service (LOS) "COO or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may
occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized interSections. interseCtions
west of I-80S me not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection
may reach LOS "E" or "F' during the average weekday peak hour. interSections of
arterials with freeway ramps me exempted from this Standard. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Pile 14
wpc~CN736S0
I
,
The project will not result in any significant impact to tranSpOIUtion/ciIcu1ation/ttaffic
(see memo from Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer, dated ']J21194, and Jetter from
Andy Schlaefli, Vice President, Urban Systems Associates, dated 2/18/94).
D.
parks/Recreation
The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 311Cre5/1,ooo population. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
The project will be required to provide adequate commwrlty
and neighborhood parks to serve the population of the project.
E. Drainage
The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
See letter from Dennis C. Bowling, Director Water Resources Division,m Rick
Engineering, dated 2/7/94.; memo from Roger Daoust, Sr. Civil Engineer, dated
']J23/94.
F. Sewer
The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with Sewer Master Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed
project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
See letter from Bruce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager, Eastlake Development Co., dated
2/9/94; memo from Roger Daoust, Sr. Civil Engineer, dated ']J23/94.
G. Water
The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment. and tranSmission
facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality
standards are not jeopardized during growth and construCtion. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water coriservlltion or fee
off-set program the City of Quia Vista has in effect at the time of bui)ding permit
issuance.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
m 1M YBE l:iQ
a.
Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health?
D
D
.
wpc~CN736.~
Pili. 1S
b.
(
.
Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
[J
[J
.
Comments:
The project site nor the operation of the project would result in any significant health hazard
or an exposure to such a hazard. Please refer to references in f 1 above.
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
m. MAYBE NO
L
b.
The obstiuction of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or will the proposal
result in the creation of an aesthetically
offensive site open to public view?
.
[J
[J
[J
[J
.
The destlUction, or modification of a scenic route?
Comments:
The project will not obstJUct any public view or vistas. create any demoosttable negative
aesthetic effect or, at this level of review. impact a scenic route.
m MAYBE !:ill
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
[J
[J
.
Comments:
The project will be required to meet the recreational needs of its residents in accordance with
City park standards which include recreational facility standards.
20. Cultural Resources.
YES MAYBE !:ill
L
Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destlUction or a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
[J
[J
.
b.
Will the proposal result in advme
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building. strueture.
or object?
Does the proposal have the potmtial to
cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
[J
[J
.
[J
'[J
.
c.
[J
[J
.
d.
p.e 16
wpc~CN736S4
e. Is the area identified on the City's
. General Plan EIR as an area of high
potential for archeological resources?
(
[]
[]
.
Comments:
See Section 5.2.3 (pg. 5-3) of EIR"86-4 (Sch: 86052803).
.m. MAYBE ~
21. Paleontological Resources. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction of paleontological
resources? .
[]
.
[]
Comments:
See Section 4.7 (pg. 4-75) of EIR-86-4 (Sch: 860522803).
22. Mandatory Findin&S of Significance.
YES MA YBE ~
a.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. cause
a fish or wildlife population to drop below self
sustaining levels. threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community. reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
animal or e1irninate important examples or the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
[]
[]
.
Comments:
As has been noted above in this checklist, the site is void of any biological resources and
therefore. would have no significant impact on any of these resourceS. Cultural resources
(prehistoric and historic) have been previously mitigated and no further action is necesSllI)'.
b.
Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term goals to the disadvantage of 10ng-
term. environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs in
a relatively trief, definitive period of time.
while long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
[]
[J
.
Comments:
The proposed project conform to the Qula Vista General Plan and therefore, the project
complies with the long term goals of the City of Chula Vista for the site.
Page 17
WPC F:\llCNEll'lANNlNCN736.M
c.
Docs the project have impacts which are
individually limited. but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact two or
more separate resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those impacts on the
environment is significant.)
D
D
.
Comments:
The project impacts are so limited to preclude IIIIY significant cumulative impact. In the case
of air quality impacts, the increase of 97 units, or I maximum of 970 ADT, compared to the
existing,lIIId approved units IIIId ADT, the impact is minimallllld less than significant. Also,
the site is void of IIIIY significant biological or cultural resources IIIId paleontological resources
will be fully mitigated.
d.
Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial advent effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
D
D
.
Comments:
At the time of consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review, supplemental
acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan
Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation of roadways IIIId residential
development pads. With this infonnation it will be feasible to make l1li accurate forecast of
noise levels IIIId the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels IIIId the
appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to l1li acceptable 65 exterior
dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast
and must validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
Poae 18
WI'C~(N736.94
Mitiaation Measures
(To be completed by the Applicant)
I, as owner/owner in escrow.
&ur.! N. $<.0;.',/\/
SR. "'P!<n';f' IIt::R EI?s-rt,(K.l 7)Et/ c"
Print name
or
.
I, consultant or agent
~oo """"'" ""'"' """""............... '"_.
Z /t.~ jql'
Signature Date
Determination
(To be completed by the Lead Agency. Check one box only.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[J I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be FPared.
. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[J I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
~~./'1</
'-f1I! ~n..:..t (-I~"":'I J
Environmental Review . ator' ,
-
Date
"If ICting for a corporation, include capacity and company 1W1Ie.
WPC F:'HOIdE\I'1AIOONGII736.,.
Pile 19
Case No. -:r,~ - q'-l - \'1
APPENDIX n
DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION
(Chapter 1706. StatUtes of 1990 - AD 3158)
. It is hereby found that this project involves no potential for any adverse effect, either
individually or cumulatively on wildlife JeSOUICCS and that a "Certificate of Fee
Exemption". shall be prepared for this project.
It is hereby found that this project could potentially impact wildlife. individually or
cumulatively and therefore fee in accordance with Section 711.4 (d) of the FISh and
Game Code shall be paid to the County Clerk. ~""'05. ~e ~d
~e""c..:>s.",-, ...;:;~~~.. ~ \ R .litc/\ ~I.<>."" c;..~
G~'-' ~e:::>~<o~~"" 9\0.".
~ rt.;.J--Ic,~~)
Environmental Revi w Coordinator
0I~'i'/'i <{
Date
Paae 20
WI'C _0MIN'\ANIIIN0Il'/3U4
-
.
" .
CeseNo. 1~-q<-l~I'\
APPENDIX III
CITY DATA SHEET
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
L
n.
m.
~rrent Zonin!! on site:--2c..
Nonh .
South ,.
East JI
West ~
(~ f.m--..~.~
.,
I.
II
"
Does the project confonn to the current zoning?-f ~. ~ .
~ - ~""""1 L....~4c.)
~eral Plan land use ~::atiL ~it~ ;:::- j~~'::...~':~'f\.~: ~-:J:?-<.~
South
East ~_ ~.(~ '''''A.~~ A.......A.....7AJ a-I- DV~~~
West ~ ';"'!r. II 'I It
;!J.~' t. I ~~
Is Ihe project compatible with Ihe Genera! Plan Land Use Diagram? --S u.."
Is the project II'U designated for conservation or open space or adiacent to an area 10 designated?
~--
If the proposed project is residential. please complete Ihe foUowing:
0IDentiDI
Jll:1cn
.!O
. :J9
. .10
StlldeDlS
Qeoerated
from Proiect
IV.
Units
S~hoo1 ~.!)atitv EnrOl1m~t PmDose4
E'--"", ~.J.J. ...,,~' - - 47
JtmiorHip ~......,,;~ 4f'
SeaIor Hip ~t;;t L- "t 7
-:;J:~ ~: ~!~.:; ~~ ~~~ !11~~.11
2."
"-V
.0
fJ~ l4~~'
Director ofti.nrung or ~sen~ve
:I:z.'J../~i
D I
-~
~=-IU.laUn)(llf.I02U3)
..... 1
~
APPUCATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE
PLAN IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN 8-1(2. X 11 FOLDER
...-,....,..,., -.
;~:~rMJ
(t>pst:~t:'7<1~
;~iK~r_.'.
A.~Ptc:d~Y "t)m'
Pi9ject}olo.FAc . 'r
~~p~~~~1a~~ta ~~~,~~.~;
BACKGROUND .~~ ~o;: ....,
.......,.. ..
1. Project Title Eastlake Greens GDP /SPA Amendment ....J/...;,
2. . Project Location (Street address or description)East of SR- 1 2S, North of.
orange Ave, South of otay Lakes Rd./ Telegraph Canyon Rd.,
. and West of Hunte Parkway.
A.
INITIAL STUDY
Assessors Book. Page &. Parcel No. NA
3. Brief Project Description The project is a transfer of D.U. within the
existing Eastlake Greens SPA (no net increase) and an expans~on of
the SPA boundary (22.7 ac and 97 dU).Refer to attached Project Descril
4. Name of Applicant Eastlake Development Company
Address 900 Lane Ave., Ste. 100 Fax#421.,1S30 Phone 421-0127
City Chula Vista. State CA Zip 91913
S. Name of Preparer/Agent Gary Cinti - Cinti Land Planning
Address 3625 Midway Dr., *292 Fax# 223-5108 Phone 223-7408 .
City San Diego State CA Zip 92110
Relation to Applicant Land Planning Consultant
6. IndiC8le all pcnnits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by the Environmental
Review Coordinator.
(
a. Permits or approvals required.
_ General Plan Amendment
~ RezontJPrezone .
_ Onding hnnit
_Tclllath:e Parcel Map
_ Site Plan at Arch. Review
. ____ Special Use Permit
)( Design Review Application
X Tcnwive Subd. Map .
_ Rcdevelopmeot A,.ency OPA
_ RcdcvelDpmcnt A,.ency DDA
___ Public Project
+- AmleUlioo
____ SpecifIC Plan
~ Conditional Use Permit
_ VuiaDce
_ Coastal DcvcJopmc:nI
J(. 0Ihcr I'I:nnit &'liP
SR'
If project is a General Plan Amendment and/or rezone, please indiClte the c:bange in designation from
to
b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Cooniinator).
(
_ Grading Plan
_ Partel Map ,
. Precise Plan
= Specific Plan
_ TraffIC Impact Report
_ Hazardous Waste Assessment
Arch. Elevations
. - Landscape Plans
= Tcnwive SubcL.Map
_ Improvement Plans
_ Soils Report
_ Geotechnical Report
_ Hydrological Study
_ Biological Study
_ Archaeological Study
_ Noise Assessment
_ Other A,.cncy PcrmJt
..x..-.Other Project Descripti.
.
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
1.
a.
161.4 (amend. area)
Land Area: square footage or 8creage B <; J _ 2 f SPA area)
If land area to be dedicated. state acreage ~d pwpose. .
b. Does the project involve the constrUCtion of new buildings, or will existing structure be
~? Yes, see Project Description.
2. Complete this section. if project is residentisl or mixed use.
L Type of developmen~ Single Family _ Two Family ~ Multi Family
Townhouse Condominium'
- - .
b. Total number of structures 2871 residential du permi ttted
c. Maximum height of structures varies per P.C. District Regulations
d. Number of Units: 1 bedroom ...12-
2 bedroom ..liA-
3 bedroom ....12-
4 bedroom ..liA-
Total Units ~
e. Gross density (DU/total acres) :3.4
f. Net density (DU/total acres minils lilY dedication) 6.6
g. Esamated project population to be determined
h. Estimated ssle or Ielltal price range to be determined
i. Square footage of structure to be determined
j. Percent oflat covClagC by buildings or sttuctures per P .C.' Regulations
Ie. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided per P.C. Requlations
1 Percent of site in road IIId paved surface to be determined
X Complete this section if project is commercisl or industrial or mixed usc.
L Type(s) of land usc
b. Floor ~ Height of lCr\JCtURS(s)
Co Type' of construction used in the ItI:UCtIue
d.Desaibe auVor access points to die structures IIId the orientation to adjoining properties
IIId streets
Co Number of on-site parking spaces provided
f. Estimated number of employees per shift
Number of shifts Total
g. ~ed number of ~OIllClS (per day) ad basis of estimate
WPCIF:\i~02I.uJ(W. mD.b)(W 10Z2.f.I1
Paoe: 1.
Hours of operation
Type of exterior lighting
}c.. . . If project is other than residential, commerci.al or industrial complete this sedion.
. a. Type of project
.
h.
i
j~
.k.
L
Eslimated num~r of deliveries per day
Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate
Type/extent.of operations not in enclosed buildings
b. Type of facilities provided
Co Square feet of enclosed structures
d. Height of structure(s) - Jiwdmum
c. Ultimate occupancy load of project
f. Number of on-site paIting spaces to be provided
g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces
h. Additional p~ject characteristics
C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
1. Will the project be required to obtain a pennit through the Air Pollution Control District (APCD)?
No.
."
2. Is any type of grading or. excavmon of tbci property anticipated? Yes, based on future
. Bubm1ttaJ.s.
If yes, complete 1;he following:
a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many.cubic yards of earth will be excavated?
NA
b. How many cubi~ yards of fill will'be placed? NA
Co. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded? NA
d. What will be Ihe: ~m depth of cut NA
'Avezage depth.of cut NA
Maximum,depth of fill NA
Average depth offill NA
.~02I.....tJca.r.l_tJ)ca.r.'lI22.tJ)
Pace 3
(
3. Descri~ all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of
energy used (air conditioning, electrical appliance, heating equipmeiu, etc.)
Nnrm~l TP~idential enerav use.
4. Indicate die amount of natural open space that is pan of.dIe project (sq. ft. or 1CreS)
None.
5.. If the project will JeSUIt in any employment opportunities dcsaibe die IUIIUrc and type of these
jo~. Construction related' jobs.
".
6. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or substances -be used or stored within
. .
the project site? NA
7. How many estimated automobile trips. per day. will be generated by the project? None in
excess of those addressed in previousEIR.
II. Describe [If any) off-siteimprovcments M~SSIl)' to imp\cmcnt the project. and dleir points of
. access or COMCCtion to the project site. Improvements include but not Jimitcd to the fonowing:
. new streets; street ~idening; extension of gas. eleCtric, and sewer lines; cut and fill slopes; and
pcdcst:rian and bicycle facilities. None in excess of those previously'
identified for EastLake Greens. (refer ~n Ra~tL~k~ Gr~enRPFFP).
D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SE1TING
1. . Geolol!V
Has . geology study been conducted On the propcny? Yes, see Eastlake Greens ErR.
(If )'CS. please attach)
Has a soils repon on the project site been made? Yes. see Eastlake Greens EIR.
(If )'CS. please attach)
i
2. ,Hvdrolol!V
. Arc any of the fonowing features present on or adjacent to the sue?
(If )'CS. explain in detail.)
L . Is chcrc any surface evidence of a shallow growtd water table? No.'
..'
~02I..u:scw:._tJlCW: 10Z1.tJ1
.....
b.
c.
d.
e.
3. Noise
L
b.
Axe there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site?
In previously approved facilities.
Does runoff from the project site drain direct1y in to or toward a domestic Water supply.
lake. reservoir or bay? No.
Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas? Potential
exists but would be mitigated by conditions to future T.T. map
, .
besaibe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location. To be determined
bv future submittals and previously approved tract map.
Axe there any noise 1Ourc:es in the project vicinity which may impact the project site?
No. Future arterials may impact some areas.
Will noise from the project impact any sensitive rcceptOlS (hospitals. schools. single-
family residences)? No.
4. Biolol!V
L Does the site involve any Coastal Sage Scrub vegetation? No.
b. Is the project site in a natural or partially naturaJ ~e? No.
c. If yes. has a biological survey been conducted on ihe property?
Yes x. No (Please attach a COPY.)Refer to previous EIR.
d. Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate location. height, diameter. and
species of trees. and which (if any) will be removed by the project. 8i te is semi-
developed with remnants of previous dry farming/cattle
grazing on. the remainder,
S. Past Use of the Land
L Axe there any known historical or archeological resources located on or near the project
site? No.
b. . Arc there any known paleontological reSources? No.
Co Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site?
No.
d~ What was the land previously used loti Dry farming/Cattle grazing
WI'C-.F.IIIOMI-:I/'IANHIN0IS'I'UREI70I021.A.'.' (lid. ,02UJI (lid. 1022.0JI
p_s
6. Current Land Use
a. Describe: all structures and land uses CUITently existing on the project site.
**See answer below**
b. Describe: all struCtures and land uses currently existing on adjacent propcny.
North Eastlake Business Center'
Souili Vacant Otay Ranch - Future development
Ean Vacant - Future Eastlake Neighborhoods
V(~ Eastlake High School/Community Park and Future developmer
7. Social .
. . ~ofte on parcels proposeq fQr an increase
L Axe ilierc any residents on IUC1. If 10, bow manY-I in units.
b. Axe there any CUrTent employment opportunities on lite? No.
If 50, how many and what type?
8. PJcase provide any other infonnation which may assist in the evaluation of the ProposCdproject.
Sites have been fully evaluated in Eastlake Greens SPA EIR and
recent General Plan Amendment EIR for Land Swap areas.
See also attached Project Description for additional aa~a.
**Answer to 6(a): Construction/structures exists on approx. one-half
of EastLake Greens. Parcels proposed for amend-
ment with existing structures are only being
amended to reflect existing conditions with no
increase in units.
,
WPC:F.1~011-A." IRcf.I02D.9J) /W.ICI22.9J)
Pqe6
E. CERTIFICATION
(
I. IS ownerIowner in escrow.
F.~stl~keDevelopment Company
~ruce Sloan. Proiect Manager
Print name
or
1, consultant or agent.
Print name
HEREBY AFFIRM. that to the best of my belief, the statements and infonnanon herein contained are in all
respects 1nIC and correct and that all known infonnanon concerning the project and its letting has been
included in this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for
attachments thereto.
.
~
Owner/Owncr in Escrow Signature
or
~ or Agent Signature
/ / ,d~tf
I '
Date
-If ICting for a corPoration. include capacity and company name.
.... 7
~ ..tr.lWl'WD.ft'nDcn..t~ ILL lmrLeJ\JIIt!llZ1.D)
INITIAL STUDY PROCESSING AGREEMENT
Name of Applicant: Eastlake Development Company
~ 900'Lane Ave., Ste. 100
Cil)': Chula Vista SIaIc CA
Name of AUIhorized ReprcsenIaIive ("If IiplDlory): 1'1 TU ce S loa n
~ Qon T.Anp J..v~.. Sf:.@ 100
City . "h" 1 2 \1'4 ~ ~::II State CA
Apement Date:
Deposit Amount $ 7 5 0 . 00
'Ibis Apeanent ("Agreement, between the City of 0IuIa VisIa, a dw1erod municipal corponIIion ("City")
8Dd the forenamed applicant for an Initial Study (" Applicantj, drective as of die ~ Date ICI forth aiIove,
Ii made with merence to the following faas:
Phone 421-0127
Zip 91913
Phone 4"_0127
Zip 91913
Whereas. the Applicant bas applied to the City for an Initial Study of the type afOla'CCerenced ("Initial
Study' which the City bas required to be obtained as a condition to permitting the Applicant to develop a parcel
of poopeny: and,
Wbereas.the City wiJl incur expenses in order to process said Initial Study Ibrough the various departments
and Were the various boards and commissions of the City ("Processing Services"); and.
Whereas. the purpose of Ibis agreement is to reimburse the City for all expenses it wiJllncur in connection
with providing the Processing Services;
Now, therefon:, the parties do hereby aa=. in caehange for the mutual promises hcnin conlaincd, as
follows:
L Applicant's Duty to Pay.
The Applicant sha11 pay all of the City's expenses Incumd in providing Processing Service Idatcd to
applicant's Initial Study, including all of the City's direct and overlIead c:osIs rdaIed 1hcreIo. 'Ibis duty of
the Applicant sha11 be memd to berein as the "Applicant's Duty to Pay."
A. Applicant's Deposit Duty
As parti:ll performance of the Applicant's Duty to Pay,the ApplicantsbaU cIepasiIthe IIIIOUIIt
afOla'CCerencec1 ("Deposit'.
1. The City sha11 char&e its lawful cpenses Incumd in providing f'.DCCISing Scr.ices
. against the App1icant's DeposiL If, aflCr the conclusion of ",~g the Applicant's
Initial Study, any portion of the Deposit RII\Ii1IS. the City sha11 RtunI said balance to the
Applicant without interest 1hcreon. If, during die poc:essing of the Applicant'slnitial
Study, the amount of ~ Deposit 'becomes exhausted. or is imminelltly likely 10 become
exhausted in the opinion of the City, upon notice of same by die City ,the Applicant sha1l
forlhwith provide lOCh additional deposit as the City sha11 caltvll'lt as _lIIIly
lie{ '''1 10 continue to provide P;ocessing SeMa:s. The duty of die Applicant to
initiaJly deposit and to supplement said deposit as herein required sha11 be known as the
"Applicant', Deposit Duty",
D. City's Duty
The City shaI1, upon the condition that the Applicant is not in breach of the Applicant's Duty 10 Pay or the
Applicant's Deposit Duty, use good faith to provide plocesslng IClVices in relation to the ~cant's Initial
Study application. .
~021""'91(W 102O.91)(W 1022.91)
PAIC a
(
Tht City shall haVt no liability huwnda 10 Iht Applicant for Iht fail= 10 process Iht Applicant's
Initial Study application. or for failure 10 process tht Applicanl's Initial Study within tht limt
framt Rq~ by \he Applicant or tsIimaltd by tht City.
B. By Qecution of \hiS apeement. tht Applicant shall have DO righllO cIi=t or ~ influence
tht conducl of lilt Initial Sludy for which \he I\Pplicanl bas I\Pplitd The City shall 1* its
discretion ill evaluating 1M Appliclnt'. Initial Study Ipp!icllion wiIhouI regard ID 1M AppIicanl's
pomise ID pay for 1M P\ocess;ng Services. or thC eucalion of tht ~
A.
m. IlemeditS
A. Suspension of Processing
In addition 10 all odIcr riahls IIId rcmodiea which tht City shall ~ haft at law er equity,
tht City bas tht righllD suspmd lDdIor withho1c11M ....ceasi.\g cllM Initial-Study which i: tht
IUbjtct maI\C'r or \hiS Agreement, .. weU .. tht Initial Study which may be 1M IUb~ mailer of
any other Permit which Applicant bas before tht City.
B. Civil Col1ec\ion
In addition to all oIha righls IIId ranedies which tht City shall ocMrwise have all law er equity,
lilt City bas \he right to c:oUcct all sums which arc or may becomt due hcrcundcr by civil .won,
and upon instiluting litigation ID c:ol1cd _, tht p-evailing party shall be entitled ID nasonablt
atIOn\ty's f= had c:osIS.
IV. MisceIJaneous
A. NoIiccs
All notices. tbnands er RqueslS provickd for er pamiaed 10 be given puramnllO \hiS Agreemenl .
must be in writing. All noIices. demands and Rque51s to be JaIl to any party shall be clccmed 10
have been propc:rIy given er served if penona1ly served er dqIosited in tht United Slates mail,
adchssed ID such party, poSUlgt prepaid, regislcmt or cenifitd. with relum n:c:eipt Rques\ed, at
tht addressc:s ickntir~ adjacenllD 1M aignatures cl tht panitS ~
B. Governing Law/Venut
This Agn:cment shall be governed by and c:onsIIIIed in 8CCOI'CIance with tht Laws of tht Slatt cl
California. Any action arising under er reIatin& ID \hiS Agreement shall be brought only in 1M
fedual er Slate couns located in San Diego County. Stale or California, and If Ipplicablt. tht City
of Chub vistA. er .. clost thereIo .. possibk. Venut for Ibis. qrcieIMII\, and performance
hmunder, shall be tht City of Quia Vista. .
C. Nultipk SignatoritS
If Ih= arc multiple signatories ID Ibis asreemcnt on bchalf of Applicant, each cl auch signatories
Jha1l be jointly and ItveraUy liable fer tht petfonnance of Applicant'. duties Iten:in let forth.
D. SignllOly Authority
The signatory 10 Ibis agRement hereby WIIJIIIIS IIId ......:5/ nls tlmt it is tht duly designated IpIt
for Iht Applicant IIId has been duly authorized by tht Applicant ID QecuIe \hiS Agreement on
beha1f of tht ApplicanL Signatory shall be penona1ly liable for Applicanl" Duty 10 Pay and
Applicant", Duty 10 Deposil in tht evenl it has noI been authorized 10 eucute Ibis A,..--I by
the ApplicanL
~02I''''''3(1101.ID3D.93)(IId'.Icm.931
Paae 9
E.
Hold Harmless
I
\
Applicant sha1l defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its elected md appointed o(facas
and employees, from and against all daims ror clama&es. liability, cost md Cltpense (including
wilhout limitalion anomeys' rees) arising out or processing Applicant's Initial Study, Cltcept only
ror diose cbims arising CJOm the sole ncgliScnte or sole wiIlCul conduct or the City, incumd by
the City, its oCrlCClS, qcnts, or employees in defending against such claims. whether the same
proceed 10 judgement or not. Funber, the Applicant, at its own Cltpense, 1halI, upon written
RqUCSt by the City, defend any such suit or action brought against the City, its officas. agents,
or employees. Applicant's indemnika1ion cl the City IhalI be limbed by any prior or subsequent
declaration by the ApplicanL
Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures.
No suit or arbi\l':ltiOll sh:l1l be brought arising out cl Ibis 8!1' eement, against die City .inless a claim
lias fust been presented in writing and flied with the City or Chula Vista and acted upon by the
City of Chula Vista in accordance with the poc:ecIiRs &I rorth in Chapter \.304 cl the 0wIa Vista
Municip:li Code, as same may from lime 10 lime be amended. die provisions or which are
Incorporated by the reference as if rully set rorth herein, and such poUcics md procedures used by
the City in die implemenlation or same. Upon request by the City, the Applicant sha1l meet and
confer in good faith widl the aty ror the purpose or resolving any dispute over die tamS or this
AgreemenL
Now, therefore. the parties hereto,l!aving r=d and undersIood the terms and conditions of this agreement,
do hereby Cltpres5 their consent 10 the tamS hereor by setting their hand hereto 011 the date set rorth adjacent thereto.
F.
City
City or Chula Vista
216 Fourth Avenue
;~~
Dated: ~/ '/1'1 .
Applicant (or authorized representative)
Bruce Sloan, Project Mgr.
Eastlake Development Company
By;
By;
Dated:
"
fI&e 10
~.21""'''CW.I02D.''I(W.ID22.J31
'1
~.
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
SI.'''"'''''t of disclosure of c:enain owuership interests. payments, or campaign contributions. on all matters which
wi11 require discretiOllll)' action on the pan of the City Council, PIaIIning Commission, IIId all other official bodies.
The following information must be disclosed:
I.
2.
3.
Ust the _ of all persons have . finaDciaJ inIerest in the conlnCl. i.e.. CODIrICIOr. subcontractor
aweriallllpplier. . .
R~~~18ke DeveloDment Company
If l1li)' penon ideulified pursuanllO (I) above is . corporltion or pu1Denhip. list the IIIDICS of all
iDdividuail ownin& more than 10" oftbe IIwa fa the oorporadon or ownin& l1li)' pIItDeJShip III1erest in
Ihe partnerShip.
.,. t: 'Rn~wP 11
If any person identified pumllllllO (I) above is DOn-profit OI'Ianizllion or . uust. list the IIIDICS of any
penon serving as director of the non-profit ora...;ulion or as uustee or beneficialy or uustee of the UUSt.
tJl1
4.
Have you had more than $2SO wonh of business _ed with any -'- of the City lUff. Boards.
Commissions, CommitteeS and Council within the past twelve months?
No .
,
s.
Please identify each and eveI)' person, including any Igents. employees, consuItIIIIS or iDd~t\ent
contrlClOrs who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
Rnh Santos. Kent Aden. Bruce Sloan, Katy Wright
6.
Have you mdlor your officers or 19erl!S, fa the 1UfC11Ie. contributed more than $1.000 10 . Council
~ in the c:uncm or precedin& dection period? Ya ( ] No "J If yes. IWe which Council
1II"V''''''is): .
'- II dcfiaIId u: -. iIIdiYiduI1. firm. co-pu"IIIa'Ihi,Joim..... _ .. ..... ~ club. fIa-..J orr..l j .........- d~D.ISIIte. .
-. _.1) .........-0Dd aIIJ' __.dIy ODd _.dIy. . ....;,y.diIIricI.._poIiIioaI---...." - paap
. ~L'--tMe III:IiD& u . aait. .
(NO'm: -...... '...... -ty)
~k
Bruce Sloan, proJect Manager
Date:
.
Eastlake Development Cdmpany
Print or type _ of contractor/applicant
YS-S"ll
Case No. -,:.~ -q""-f"f
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENT SHEETS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
I. Drainal!e
A. J!; the project site within a flood plain'? ,Jo.
Jf so, state which FEMA Floodway Frequency Boundary. ~'" .
B. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities'?.sv~~.z: I="I.d4/
Il> ~WIA~.AJ.J" CITY 9r1::JJ!/ut~~..,.~ ~-IIM.'vI!!V~~ CY<S7"'II!AJI
C. Axe they adequate to serve the project'? LID.
Jf not, please explain briefly. 'Pl!L:IT"~/-- ~IR~ .,.,DL.,a.1A/:.';:' IMP~':':~ W,u..
~ ~---(fU'P~O WII&#.J T>e~1 AAA~~ ""'/1 JJX: -
D. What is the location and description of existing off-site drainage facilities'? ~I ~/''''... PII
~AAJ"'~ r.De'1!:"JI' ~~1:. .l'A"'VrJJ "'~K AND ~t."- ~.r.eU'
I '
E. Axe they adequate to serve the project'? NO.
Jfnot. please explain briefly. 1l~/.IJ?I.,AL. /M~o/.,.~e..-n::. ~y - ~/.~~Ai
-
f'" -n+E.. ~-r: {'~tY-.J A/JD .....A.T ~'~11!. ~^'~ AS ~"E.l~~
/'}/ .L-I J&L. .
n.
~1~1~4-
./ \
1ranroonation AiJ NA~ -rD -nt~ -rPAFfI'lC. srtC>Y Fip.. T-lt!' J1iI.~1:I! &~'''5r.
SPA E.fR.w'Iu..~. 1Zk;P/~(Y"(. f",c/Jg'l$E. IN T'1JIA.FFu;.;:;W;; ~"'rne.1oJ ~
A. What roads provide primary access to the project'? 6Xt9r#J6.
~
B. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be generated by the project (per day)'? $),
C. What are the Average Daily Traffic (A.D.T.) volumes on the.primary 8CCCSS I'OIIds before and
after project completion1
Street Name Before Afrrz
Do any of these volumes exceed the City's Level-o!-ServiI:e (LO.s.) .C" design ADT
volume'? Jf yes, please specify.
..
~a-.noREIN=p) (J.oI. 1021.93) (14. ID2U3)
'''' 2
.
Y$ -9f I
Case No. rt;-'?4-fq
If the A.D.T. or L.O.S. "C" design volume is unknown or not applicable. explain briefly.
. D. Are the primal)' access roads adequate to serve the project?
If not, please explain briefly.
E. Would the project create unacceptable Levels of Service (LOS) at interseetions adjacent to
or in the vicinity of the project site?
If so, identify: Locinion
Cumulative L.O.S.
F. Is the proposed project a "large project" under the Congestion Management Program? (An
equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle
trips). If yes, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TlA) will be required. In this case the TlA will
have to demonstrate that the project will not create an unmitigatable adverse impact, or that
all related traffic impacts are not mitigated to a level of non-significance.
Yes No
The following questions apply if a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required.
G. Is traffic mitigation required to reduce traffic impacts that will result from implementation of
the proposed project? Yes No
If yes, please describe.
H. Is the project co!l~istent with the aiteria established in the City's Transportation Phasing Plan.
General Plan Traffic Element, and all other peninent traffIC studies? Please seference any
other traffic impact stUdies for roadway segments that may be impacted by the poposed
project.
L
J.
Is a traffIC study required?
Is there any dedication required?
If '0, please specify.
Yes
No
Pile 3
WI'C~022.93 (aof.IIIUn)(aof. IADn)
.
YS-9f1
Case No. I$ .J1L(--{'t
K. Is there any street widening required?
If so. please ~cify.
L. Arc there any other street improvements required?
If so. please specify the senera1 nature of the aecessary improvements.
M. Will the project and rdate4 public improvements provide satisfactory traffic lervice for
existing conditions and future buildout General Plan conditions? (please provide a ".rief
explanation).
m.
~oils
IV.
A. Arc there any anticipated adverse geotechnica1 conditions on the project site? IJIoJ KJ.JDw.J .
B. If yes, spec~y these conditions. ~A- .
c. Is a Soils Report necessary? YG~ FE:)('fS-rIlJr.. SDI / ~ IZ~TS MlJS~~ 1JtD\-n:D
/rlJt>/tJIZ. AM~~ 7?> fi>J4JJr::>e 'n(-E AqjAS
Land Form N./A . 'P1?c~~ 'Tl) ~ M'fY"r:> Tt> T'HE EXISTl~,
~(!'P ~PA . .
A. What is the average natural slope of the site?
B. What is the maximum natural slope of the site?
V.
~
Arc there any ttaffic-related noise levels impacting the site that Ire significant tIIough to justify that
a noise analysis be required of the applicant? 1J#J"'...Lo>lA.t.' . AJJ Au ~LI~1A~'r "Tr.) TuF ~A
t;;/~ ./JOfSe ~V5IS tVl4,. Be. ~/~r:> .
VL Waste Generation
How much solid and liquid (sewer) waste wiD be pnerated by the proposed project per day?
Solid ~ 'PIWJ,JDC. _~ DAY I'JIlIE./l... ~tr 1!W14iin~, At:\U~~ c:;'PA
Liquid . ~';;;':~~6 ~.Q. D4yh!:'.:15" ~LJ~)l)v~ "r'U6 &)(fqn~ A~lOb~.
~ '
What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or downstrelm from the lite?
,~.. Pv~ S~ urJ~ I-.J ~,.~;1'>AA"'L. "'-'-aIVn",J 11'!f'a.'I J~"'~ ~ AAl~ .It 12,t ~ ~
~A.I~ ~JJ e:~ve PAiJ"'_-I (,.,-,.;; ~:"'e? ~~ fUIT'Ul.u.."'JAu.. AI-1W~ wh,' ~
Vi
.J W equate to s~ fpr ~ pr9ject? (If no. please explain) 1.10. SoME. SEI:.M~~
\~ K~~'
& ]\\";\ ~ ~";";'J"7OItrl'.61Alr:>,.,-.;~. AMI!!.I.J~=1"rC. Tl:.> "1'JIE 1"" r::~1UtPII t!A.t./."'JOIol ~,.L
~ 'P(..,4fJ HJD ~ ~(Jp~~v SE~ &4SfN Pu.#J WILL- Sf!: ~VIDeh.
WI'C~D22.:!3 ~.IIIZI.9S>(Iot 1020.93> Pip"
~..gr (
CaseNo.~
VD. ~ationaJ Pol1utant Discharl!c Elimination Svstem CNPDES) Stormwater Reauirements
Will the applicant be required to file a Notice of Intent with the Stale Water Resources Control Board
for coverage under an NPDES Stormwater Pennit? YE~.
. If yes. specify which NPDES permit(s) ~d explain why an NPDES permit is required. "'/oJ N.~
.WploAl"- -F'?' ~Ll.W~' ":J)(~.u.nt:.~~ ~r~.A~ wrn4 &&..l&.lr'flJV:~t>-.J
!:~""'';'''':''IE.~. J" ~~,.,- ,< p,:::".:<(, ,tJ')~ 8e"'~u~e ,.,v"q;l '::/11'1;: AJI'~
:'U _ T.J19-v12....."t7 A+(b 7lJ::'/'..M~~ ft!>~ ~/r>PAAE...,.,- /~
~ ~F: ~ ~P~-() /'m.ANf~ cr.A IJ ot= l::>E.//e'J1AAaJ'r CR. S\I &" .
Will a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be required for the proposed project?
'.)( Yes No
Additional comments lololJ.t!: .
VD. Remarks
Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impacts. mitigation measures. or other
issues. j74-e. ~/_fL:..A..,.,- ~ A!bA'o&EC1 JrSs.r~."--"",- "1}~I~"- ':1&'A"""'I~
F'oA. V,.JAI , C lAAe>I!JJI/~M'..n-z,.
cih f q-f
. . ,
Date
~~O%U3(RG.11I!1")(RG.102D.93)
PIF'
.
Case No. Js.Q4.IGJ
nRE DEPARTMENT
A. What is the distance to the nearest fire station? ~ what is the Fire Depanment'. estimated
reaction time? ~+o sL t, ~,,","n. f'l"GNion +iVV\t:J
:
B. Will the Fue Dep~ment be able to provide an .scquate level of fire pvcection for the
proposed facility without an increase in equipment or peDOMel'1 'I e.s.
C. Remarks A.)OA.)e
~' V(1f[)f)i/J,,/U
F' Marshal
ot/{;}o/q'f
Date
.
. -
..
t
~m" fJfI.ICUJICJoI,IO>>.fJ)
--- -.--,-...-- --
",Ii
-
-
Case No.-15-9+ I'j
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
A. Is project subject to Parks and Reaeation Threshold requirements? '(ji:S.
If not, please explain.
How many IaeS of parkland are ~~sPry to serve the proposed project?
~ ~ . ~~~ ".) c::;~ kp('"-'" c...-z.I\iJ\"I~'
Jue existing neiJbborbood and c:ommunity parks Dell'the project .sequate to lelVe the
population iDcrease suuhing from this project?
Neighborhood ~
Community Parks tJ O.
If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed as pan of the project adequate
to serve the population increase'?
Neighborhood ,,\'!~
Community Parks \' ~ .
To meet City requirements, will applicant be required to:
Provide land'? 'rit-S
Pay a fee'? '1",.,1'.
Remarks:
.B.
c.
D.
E.
F.
. .
. -
tV". ~,~
~."'f."'I't-
Dare
Parks and Reaeazion DirecIor or hpresr.hye
,.
.... 7
.
Case No. 15.q4-/q
LANDSCAPE PLANNING
A.
Does the project affect native plant conununities?
If 10, pJease identify which communities.
~
Wi11the project RquUe native plantini? (pJease describe) ~ ~ ~ .
B. PJease identify InY imponlDt or bi&hly vWbJe hiDsides 011 or adjlCelU to the project.
~
Who """""~' <0""_ (;f ~y).... '" ........,..............., ~
~~~~:;~';;; ;;~_I J~
C. Of the totalue. to be developed, how much, Ind which IJ'eIS ue eXJ1CClCd to be Rplanted
and Rquire supplemental watering? (pJease describe).
E. Aze there InY other landscape requirements or mitiption for the project? t\.O
,.
,
~
~s;~rve
.,....~ ~~.......Cft.1D22." u. 1021n)..,. 1~~)
...
(
ROUTING FORM
DATE: January 18. 1994
I
,
/
i
I
!
,
~
I '-.
rl-~'~
~~'
..
~.n urson, .JIu.UcUn9'~ lIoudn9'J
~ohn Lippitt, En9'ineerin9' (EIR only)
Cliff swanson, En9'ineerin9' (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineerin9' (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, En9'ineerin9' (15/3, EIR/2)
Richard RUdolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec ~ EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department. .
Harty schmidt, Parks , Recreation
Crime Prevention, police Department (H.J. Diosdado)
current Plannin9'
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob sennett, city Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Plannin9' Director
Chula vista Elementary School District, Xate Shurson
SWeetwater union H.S. District, Tom silva (IS' EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
other
Doug Reid
Environmental section
SUBJECT: Application for Initial study (1S- 94-19/FA-~/DO 060 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (E1R-_/FB-_/DO )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP J
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC- ERR- J
Review of Draft Reg Dee (1S- /FA- /DO- ,
!l'he Project consists of: An amendment to the EastLake Greens General
Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in:
1. The transfer of units within the existing boundaries of East
Lake GreenS to refine densities with no net increase in the
existing proposal density and
2. The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake Greens development with
an additional 97 dwelling units.
Pleas. review the document and
by 02-01-94 .
;I ~~~fc2-~~~-
4.~)<- ).zP.
(
comments:
d to .e any comments you have
ROUTING FORM
DATE: January 18, 1994
ro: Xen Larson, Building , Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
elitt Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolt, Asst City Attorney (Dratt Neg Dec , EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department .
Harty Schmidt, Parks , Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (H.J. Diosdado)
fl:"rrent planning' -
-Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula vista Elementary School District, Xate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS' EIR)
Haureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
other
FROH:
Doug Reid
Environmental section
SUBJECT: Application tor Initial study (IS- 94-1WFA-~/DQ 060 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-____/FB-____/DQ )
Review ot a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB-____/DP)
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-____ERR-_)
Review ot Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ- )
!l'he project consists ot: An amendment to the EastLake Greens General
Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in:
1. The transfer of units within the existing boundaries of East
Lake Greens to refine densities with no net increase in the
existing proposal density and
2. The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake Greens development with
an additional 97 dwelling units.
Please review the document and torward to me any comments you have
by 02-01-94
Comments: ,'-ff-t"P \.A~c. ~ ~ ~u...~&~'
, o.d) ~ t ~~"'-~ ~ ~c..c..(fp.,f'k ....0 (Q..o~
~ "1 ctv C><~ $) ~ ~ Ov-.
.
ROUTING FORM
(
DATE: January 18. 1994
~: Xen Larson, Building , Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Clitt Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (15/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolt, Asst city Attorney (Dratt Heg Dec , EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty schmidt, Parks , Recreation
crime Prevention, police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
current Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
9Ot' ;::'ItffHrit"t, t'l~y.,.....l..__k~'hH.rct'
~ob Lei ter, Pl anning Dir.c:tor --""-.-.. .
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Xate Shurson
~ sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom silva (IS , EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
other
FROM:
Doug Reid
Environmental Section
SUBJECT: Application tor Initial Study (15- 94-1WFA-~/DO 060 )
Checkprint Dratt EIR (20 days} (EIR-_/FS-_/DO )
Review ot a Dratt EIR (EIR-_/FS-_/DP)
Review ot Environmental Review Record (FC- ERR-_)
Review ot Dratt Neg Dec (15- /FA- /DO- )
!l'he Project consists ot: An amendment to the EastLake Greens General
Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in:
1. The transfer of units within the existin9 boundaries of East
Lake Greens to refine densities with no net increase in the
existing proposal density and
2. The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake Greens development with
an additional 97 dwelling units.
Please review the document and torward to me any comments you have
by 02-01-94
COlIIINnts:
~ /. .y~y:
CHULA VISTA POUCE DEPARTMENT
CRIME PREVENTION UNIT
(
PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS
" - . ~ -.
-;.., ~
~: ~- .
..... .: ~.
DATE: t-....~ ~ /qq;.f
TO: ~ R..e)..J I LlaMe.... Pw. n n er........
VIA: ~~,?~~.4hv, i),v.
FROM: "Y11.~r ~ ( 5 Q...f..5 .
PROJECT: ::J.,:>. q4 -/ q Q.I/'YI-U1d. 'f..o.-JM..L- 6J~ ~~
?bM.
_ The Critne Prevention Unit does not have any comments regarding this project at this time.
_ Infonnation on the project, or within the plans. does not provide enough detail to pennit
crime prevention analysis.
.2SL.- Please forward the following infonnation to the Crime Prevention Unit when available.
~ Elevations
Floor Plans
L Landscape and Lighting Plans
~ Site Development Plans
Comments: f?-1 Yf.....L (f'~..AM1-;t 7f~.L V AP/Jr'; /U) Ch7uni:viIp
rtiJi:tLd Y-/J Y-I...L G~ .p~-.J' f2,,, cJUHI1..,J'/71Ht:f >4)
~ ' ~ p..1...f..t)./ . 'l:n1.J :1- ~-tJ-r~ u<.J;t4..d Y4".4./ t1~tI7/
~_ -:&r"A.A/ .
,.
cc:: Brookover. SCA
C7IED ...... Farm
1!DII:ou.,.116123
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
February I, 1994
FROM:
Doug Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
Duane E. Bazze~
Principal Planner
TO:
SUBJECT:
Initial Study for EastLake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment (IS-94-19)
The Advance Planning Division appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed
project identified above. From an environmental analysis standpoint it appears that the
EastLake Greens EIR and Addendum sufficiently addressed the proposed density transfers
within EastLake Greens. The proposed transfer of units are occurring under the umbrella
of the original1y-approved EastLake Greens SPA and Tentative Map (2,774 units), therefore,
unless there are significant shifts in unit locations it would appear that the original EIR
adequately addresses the transfers.
It should not be forgotten, however, that as a condition of approval of a recent GP
amendment to Parcel 26 of the Greens (GPA-93-04), the City Council re-enacted the
affordable housing requirement for the Greens (deferred with the Tentative Map approval)
and directed staff to work with a task force to develop recommendations by July of this year
on how to handle the low and moderate income housing within this project. This direction
from Council included the consideration of any density transfers necessmy to achieve the
housing requirement. It does not appear that the proposed density transfers are significant
enough to impact the task force efforts, but nevertheless, these efforts should be considered
prior to approving any SPA amendment.
The 97 units to be annexed and added to the Greens have only been analyzed at a General
Plan level (within the Otay Ranch Program EIR) and not at the detail necessary with a GDP
and/or SPA. This needs to be taken into consideration when analyzing potential
environmental impacts. Additionally, project-level analysis needs to be coordiDated with the
Community plAnning Division of the plAnning Department (Otay Ranch SPA Team) on the
issue of land use and design interface with East Orange Avenue and efforts on the adjacent
Otay Ranch.
cc: Ken Lee
Steve Griffin
Amy Wolfe
1-.......)
MEMORANDUM
,
February 1, 1994
File # YS-591
FROM:
SUBJECT :
Doug Reid, Environmental Coordinator
Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director~~
Ci ty Engineer "
Harold Rosenberg, City Traffic Enginee~
Eastlake Greens General Development and Sectional Area
Plans Amendment
TO:
VIA:
In response to your concern regarding our transportation comment in
the subject initial study application, the following paragraph
should be added to Section VII of the application.
Previous traffic studies have shown that the circulation
system plan prior to the construction of SR125 does not
have sufficient capacity to absorb additional trips
beyond those trips accounted for in the approved maps
including the approved Eastlake Greens. Thus the
Eastlake Greens proposed expanded development project
will have to be limited to the number of trips identified
in the approved project EIR traffic study. However, the
applicant may wish to perform a supplemental traffic
study to examine possibilities of expanding the City's
circulation system (e.i. extension of E. Orange Avenue
between I-B05 and Eastlake Greens) to provide the needed
capacity. A reference to the City's interim SR-125
financial study (HNTB study) and improvement scheduling
are a critical element of the study.
ZAO: rb
cc: Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer
(P. -.-.,............,........XC,PUUIIUIII>.&AO>
MEMORANDUM
February 21, 1994
File # YS-551
SUBJECT:
Doug Reid, Environmental Coordinator .
Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy Public Works Directort. Y
City Engineer y.
Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engine<:!X / .
"~ '''~.:J.
Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment Traffic Study (IS-93~ ~
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
I have reviewed the attached traffic impact report by Urban Systems dated February 18, 1994
and fmd it to be acceptable. The new trips from the added 97 units to the Eastlake Greens
approved units of 2774 have no significant impact on the City's circulation system.
ZAO:dv
Attachment
CI':'BOME\ENGINEER\1I<AFFIC\11U'S1tJDY :LAO
URBAN SYSTEMS J'WSOCIATES, INC.
"'--. 7IwPIC e.a_. _ . I'ROJ!r:r -- ~. ,::::::. ,:::.:
CoH$Ll.TANTS TO INDUSTRY MID GovE/fMIENT '.; i y :::'.. G~ '_;L:'" ,,,'~~ ~ :-
:-~~'-;'.~:::;:" ".:-:-: ::[:.:1'
1534 fES 22 AM 9: 4S
February 18. 1994
Mr. Hal Rosenberg
City TraffIC Engineer
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vasta. CA 92010
Dear Hal:
Urban Systems Associates, Inc. (Urban Systems) was retained by Eastlake Development to
evaluate possible Impacts from the development of additional dwelling units In the Eastlake
Greens GDP/SPA Amendment. The Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment proposes an
Increase of 97 dwelling units from 2,774 DU to 2,871 DU.
frQject Trip Generation
The development of 97 additional dwelling units will result In the following peak hour and dally
trip generation.
~ PEAK PM PEAK
USE INTENSITY GENERATION N:ff
.....TE ~ ~ IN:OUT IN:OUT PIft PM IN:OUT IN:OUT
&PUT &PUT
SFDU 1700 1Ct/DU 170 ft 78 2:8 18:82 1~ 17 7:3 18:211
n can be observed. the 97 additional units will result In 97 PM peak hour trips. Of the 97 PM
peak hour trips, 68 are Inbound and 29 outbound to the project. The AM peak would have 78
additional peak hour trips with 16 Inbound and 62 outbound during the peak.
previous Traffic Study AssumDtions
A traffic study for KaIser Hospital (EasUake I SPA Amendment by JHK Associates) Yi.U
comDleted on ADrll 20, 1992. The KaIser Hospital traffic study represents the most recent
analysis of interim conditions for eastern Chula VIsta (east of 1-805). The analysis for interim
conditions assumed the 'approved projects' level of development for It's interim analysis. The
'approved project. level of development was based on the Final Eastern Chula Vista .
Transportation Phasing Plan Update prepared by Wildan AssocIates (1191).
101_ ~7
_. _"._a~ ~C'!D _ <<.1ftLCUI MUJ.. .&rJl:.tl.J/ll.~
Mr. Hal Rosenberg
February 18, 1994
Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
(
In the final report for KaIser Hospital dated April 20, 1992, (page 41), the approved project
development scenario will result in approximately 193,230 additional dally trips in Eastem Chula
Vista. The analysis included trips generated by 2,774 units in the EastJake Greens project.
Using the "approved projects" condition as the bpe, impacts from the KaIser Hospital were
evaluated. Attachment 1 shows the NIIIPM peak hour intersection level of service from the
KaIser Hospital traffic analysis.
k. shown In Attachment 1, all intersections are forecasted to operate at a level of service "D"
or better. KaIser Hospital Impacts to the intersection of Otay Lakes at EastJake Parkway (the
critical Intersection for the KaIser Project) for the NIIIPM peak results In a level of service "C"
to "D". Intersection delay was 5.2 seconds for the NIl peak and 5.4 seconds In the PM peak
at this location. The Increased delay at this location was due to more than 14,000 daily trips
from the Kaiser project being added to the base conditions.
The KaIser analysis concludes that the intersection delay at Otay Lakes Road and Eastlake
Parkway Is 25.8 seconds In the NIl peak and 29.8 In the PM peak which translates to a level
of service D. It should be noted that the Intersection delay at Otay Lakes Road and Eastlake
Parkway could be Increased as much as 10 seconds and still remain at a level of service "D".
SPA Amendment ImDacts
In oreler to determine possible impacts from the proposed SPA amendment, project traffic was
added to the Intersection analysis discussed above. All other assumDtI2n! for the computer
intersection analysis remained the same. k. shown on Attachment 2, the resulting level of
service Including project traffic remained "D" for both the NIl and PM peak. A comparison of
Attachment 1 and 2 shows that with project traffic the Intersection delay Increased only 1.5
seconds In the NIl peak and 2.1 seconds In the PM peak. this clearly indicates that the Spa
Amendment for Interim (worst case) conditions Is not likely to create Impacts which would require
mitigation or change the level of service at EastJake Parkway and Otay Lakes Road.
In addition, possible Impacts from the proposed SPA amendment were analyzed for the
intersection of Eastlake Parkway and Fenton Street. Base conditions for the intersection
analysis were obtained from the Scripps Clinic TraffIC analysis dated March SO, 1993. For the
base conditions, signal timing was optimized which resulting In a level of service "D" for the P.M.
peak or an Intersection delay of 36.7 seconds (see Attachment 3).
Project traffic was then added to the base conditions. All other assumptions for the computer
intersection analysis remained the same. H shown on Attachment 3, the resulting level of
service Including project traffic remained "D". Intersection delay changed only 0,4 seconds to
37.1. this clearly shows that the SPA amendment for interim conditions Is not Hkely to create
Impacts which would require mitigation. At build out or with an interim 125 or with an Orange
Avenue connection, Spa Amendment Impacts would be even smaller because there would be
multiple access routes.
~7
.,-
Mr. Hal Rosenberg
February 1 B, 1994
Urban Systems AssocIates, Inc.
BaSed on the Information discussed above, Impacts from the development of 97 additional units
appear to have minimal impacts on the circulation system. We therefor suggest that no further
1raffic analysis Is neceS9ary.
Please call us If you have any questions regarding the analysis discussed above.
,
APSrms:vks
Attachments
cc: Bruce Sloan
Cliff Swanson
Doug Reid
,.
vuaam.'l7
.,-
r
I
C/)
Ci5
~
..J
<C
Z
<C
a:
=>
o
:I:
~..J
<C<c
w....
a.._
zfu
-Qo
1-....:1:
\ ~oc:c:
~WW
G(f)CJ)
<c:c:_
I-W<C
I-....~
<z"
-c:c:
--0
~LL.
-
t
a:
C/)
w
a:
a..
-
.~;
z~
I~
~~
c:O
f~
A ~:E
~ 2~
! ctJ
" o<Z
.. ....
ag
!i
~~
!b
U
i
II
~~
~!
co<
f"
.. ei
~ ..~a
if i fg
~ B~
~ d
~~
!~
E!
"\
~- .
! i~ QQUDUUCQOUU UUUO.OQU.. .Q Q OC_QOO
I a..
:1!/'-i
F ~~-. ~~"~~~~~~~a ~~~~~~~~~~ illa ;~~~q~
. ~..~_~o.~c _o~_..-c.. ~-~-~
'e;; ~~"~_N~~"R -~""-"~"-- -~~"
... -
i
1_\
I i~ QDuDUUDDDUU UUUDaDUuaa .u . ...aDDU
a :
~ =1 ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~..~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~.
il ~~~R.RA~.Re ~~R~~nR~~= -a . .~=~~~
.. .
1 : J JIJ I II J
; !!jl)!IJill!!I!1 i!)!! III!III!!!
!~I!!!iJ!!g]!j!iJ8JI!!i!IJJjljl!~i
I . unn!
t 11111 I!!!!!!!! II I I!III
.~~~~!!!!!I! 111ii)ll~~ ~i I ~~...
IJJJJ~~~~~=~ =~!~~~~~g! !I I !!ffl
_"~.~.~_.Q=~ ::~~=.:~~R ~~ ~ .~~.~
.
.
~-
Is _uuuU...U.O uuuoauu-u. -0 c ac_vuv
! ...
.Ii
~ ! "'=1"'~"~~~""I~"t~o:l( 1C!"t""":-:"~"'~'iC!~ ill. "t ~~"",:"1C!"
~.. .~~_~~_..~ ~~~~~...._ ~ ~ ~~_D..
'i~1 ___N______ _N_N ----- N N N _N__
1_\
! I! auuuuaaauaD UUUDauu-u-.u ..._uuu
~IJ~:I ~:~~~=~:~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ .~ . .~~~~:
~. s_~"______~ ="_R e__=_ R _MS_
.
...
i .
I J I JIJ J II I
I Jlb)u,'jll IUJ ,!IP IU1I"Jlj
!~iJ~~ij i ~~II~~I iJ~li I ~ <!~~I
a!I~!ailll!!< a! !11!Iil Jlil!)a!
. J JUIUI
t IIIII1111111 I!!!!!!!II II J II!I!
JJIII!!iiii! illlll)}!! !I I !!fff
_ft~.~.~..a== =~=~~=~2=R ~~ ~ .~~~i
.
~
~
~
\::)
~.. tH
~II -':I-
t; ~~:i
..~ !OS
~i .!!I.
i If ri
d .iii
t it !d!1.
.II h I"';
t Ii jlil ~
Fi ! f[.i~
~ U I~ cj
! -a~ J Il.i
! U4~!t
. IU ~UI t
~ {..'S Jh.1 ~
I IB] ~ Id ~
...: PI .
i
I] tit
~J -]-
il hi
I d
It 1!.!!~
J I...U
lit JSY
JI II '!Jj ~
i II Fit I i ~
I M t,U 1 i ~
t II Utt I' ~
Hil ~lH II h
I t'l'l Ih ~ .. ,
, 16] hd ~ ! ~
.:... ~!I
J J~st !
J
I
G
~
"'I:
I::!
~
~
c:
o
u..
en
en
~
~
<
z~
<0
zw
Q3
....a:
(\I~e..
~eno
za:w
~wCl)
:I:~O
~~e..
~_o
<LOa:
C\le..
~
'w
a:J:
en....
w
c:
e..
-
~
a:
w
....
z
-
: 1 ~~~~~~I ~ 1~1 ~~I t2 :
: I =:::::::::::::: I I: I ~iE 00 I ::s I
: 1 i !5 .......!; iDe 0 cia
: I .:........ '\ :c : ~~ IoCIC IoCM ~c:: S I, ~
: I I z: ~.I ..
. 1 "-'In"'''' t I ., S
: t ~c:c:c:c:c: &:1:':.';';: ...
: i 1:::====: 1I~"''''f''I'''l :!~.uuc ~~! aN .. .. ~ 'I
. .... . UAo I Q. .
: I M.:I"~ !~~.........lt I . ~ ~ ~ ~.
: I .. I;'.. .. ~~ I ~N
: u ~c:c:c:c:c: II) DooDlE ~"II i:
: I:::::::::::: tni "'rI"'WI . U
: ~.. I !3r;t2!3r;t2 ~: I:jS"u"""u.."u,,:"
:,"E :: .......... ct: 0000!!!I ~a:~ I-
ta "'E -:0::-:0.::* = I 1...113 I:.
000000'1 OOOOIH I....~~~~~~~~~~~I!
:l1li U ......1 I~ I..~.."'.......,.......,..I~
.:~ .." ...ft"""" I Iii I OIi:iN~t"t'""''''''''''f'II"'''' I
""...............1"1 I ., .... 00 I C I
!:J;;": la!looooi ~ ool~ I::
ti ::i Ci t ..:I~"".. 'oell! I i I ~ i..;
._ tn' ."" I g..r-............._..,t"t
.. ......_.............. g.oooOI..... 001 U .....'"...."0".,1"1....
I : i: III =: I E & I I lie Ie Ie tc .. I .......,................ fit..,........
& ===i!O I E :- 000000000000'
::! In .. 1 ... In::: a ~a a a a ; =-
H . ~ ..... ~ I oC'" I H
. "CI'I~O'II ... ~~ ................i.............
i. I i3oC' 111'1.:0 . .l:MMM .... ~:~:~;::;::;;:;:s c
" :...~~=.m D :~... 00001 .. .... ... ........
.... . oCi:Iri' "" IE >_0000 I 0000000000'"
~ :t5~gE~ ~ =:~~~NI
~t:::::::il:~=O j4M M 00
t::2:!::::: ....... E =.
~..... . . . . .
..0::. ti fIoI . . . .
fi...: we:..: : :t
'"I. ...... 0 013
., :l5o(~";';~
= : kloJ~!C~
...CII.....~CQ...
10.
, 0'
ISE
.....1"'"
,
, .
:I~ ....
N
2i:MMM
t
C..",.o
".0..
.,NO>
K 0000
c_oooo
:5. . 000
a-DODO
!>~u
CIIUDC
"."11)
~
I:
. 000000.
. . . . . . . I
. ."'''''''""" I
. ...................,
. '
. ,
. '
. '
: ~........ I
. '
. '
. 000000.
. . . . . . . .
: I:::::::::::::::::::
. .
. .. ,
. I'! '
: ~ .......~ I
: 5 fi I
: I " 000000 I
i I~~~~~~!~D ::::\
i~ = ~........ I~; ::::1,
:. Q ~~~~~~II ooool~
i.~ :\ =======1 =10000 Et
!ti"' I &I I ..~........! i &
. ~ "'I H
ii I il-;::::-- Eloooo'.i
; :~ .1 :a=:: !:t.
r ... :c-....
'"': =:;WJ 1 ...
II. 'c. .~...o
. ",'SH .'I....Oft
~ :~~i1..1 ~..."'" .;~~~~
:c :t6~~~~: "_NNNN
111: : : : : : :, el;::;:o
;: :!.:..: 1 ......... . 0 go
. '"' . , . . . Ie _0 : 0
g::~E.t:':::5:' I:~~o I~oo.o
..t.!!J" ::: _ft.
. R ~.. t 9'4
: :~:!~=III
:.: ,",~2a;::B I !i~1i:1
~
......
~. c";";oo
.......I"t..
.
Ii.
..-............
..
au:
!3r;tf!3UfB~
a I Ih
&
!............r:.....
!
H
~
I
H
I
.
"'
=
I
1
,
I
,
I
'"
.
, .
,
.. i~
i~ .. "' N I
. .n . ~ ...
s" .. I"t... I:
;:1 1:
I~
!3r;t2!>~tfB!lc!"UUu"u.""".,..
I I I... 1....9'4~....~"...9'4. i
..;....00.....:..;. !
:: i"NNHNftN..Nftft :
00 u:::=~:=:t:~"
tete .. _,,9'4...~o.....""OIn
e.1 000000000000 i
~~. u:~:=~~~~~~; !
..... ~~~~~~~~~~~~I
I 00000000000
~~, ei I"
="'1 & ,!
.. 'H
I !~....~....~..~.... "I' ~
!>nf!3~ne! i !
a I 11..1 a I I 1:1 i::
00
00
..
Su
S
Q
"
U
....
~~
...
00
..
H
H
,..
I:
..
....
"
IMMN
E
H
1 ..
I:
..
~
~
~
IS
I
G
~
~
~
~
~
~
Ct)
~
m
::s
~
t
r
(
~
o
W
"'?
o
0:
0..
o
W
W
o
0..1-
OW
O:W
0..0:
wI-
:I:W
~z
0:0
01-
I.LZ
W
WI.L
CO) en ~
1->-<
Z..J
~< >-
:I:z<
~<~
I-z ~
<00:
-<
~n.
o
wW
W~
0:<
W-J
~I-
ZW
-<
iC)W
N
-
,
W
a:
Q..
-
(
~
a:
w
I-
Z
-
'~:'~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~ E E
I : II) i
~ ~ ~ i
I : i5" a
~ : '": ~: .
~ : I; .... III
. .~a.
Ii .1 l..c ..."".
. ..~ . !....
.. . ~.c"',," "~..
tot . ~ III I .. I
~ :...5ISEe:
~I: : : : : :: el:::o
= :!::::: ....
. ... . . . . .
-.. ~III . . . .
Ri.:.h : :5
., : ~c~;"j";~
: : ~1oI:!C~
...jIOI~CQ'"
~ I ~1 ~~ !2 I
I: I ~E ::s
. ..........:.. .0 .. . 0 1
15 ' . .... " ,.
:c il'i' .ue MIe.... 2 "
, E ~ 'I!!
....... ::s
.; .~~..:..: i .. I
I.~~"'''':M~ teN" ~~ ~
. t tiE ..... !~ ~ ..
Ela : t . : : ~ l:n
.;::..........: ... D. I " t ~
i i" .. ~~ I' ~" I.
Z 0.001 ·
~ 1Ift1lft1lft1lft. U
; I ~~tE~~tE !.c~uu.~u.o.uo ~
fi I E. '''''''
c.. 0000 I. Ii3 I ~ -
...t: ........Ii I I I 'D .&
& 00001... ..11...0"............... r
0.0000 I I E a . . . . . . . . ., ....
. . . . . . It'" .......................... I ILl
II"""'".""' ~I 10 .....................1"11.
......_......... I :! ,... DO I Q I.
1 w'loooo ~tb oold .-
: i CAo It 1-:
~..a... IC 5 t.a I~
I .. I .................'"....
..__....__..1 e_OOOO lit... 00 I u.,....................." I
I E& I MMM' . I ...."'PI.............."'''' I
::::0 1 B: ::;.. t 00000000000 I'
.. I 2~a&.. I I=-
I 2.. I ....
I ~ lit. lit. ~~: u::=::~::::I&
: 0000 E ...: ~~~~~~~~~~~:
I ~;~~~~I I 00000000001
I _"""", I I
It... 00 I . t
I t l.tUC ..1 e, t..
I III 00001 f. =.11 G I!
I ~_OOOOI . .I~
t e~oooo! l.a....a....a...a..! I:'
i I ~l:tf~r:1K2e~!:S i I
i 11=:i D I C$! I I I = 1~
0000001
..... .1
...."'...."'...
...................1
.
,
,
I ........~ I
I, ~~~~~~:
. ..."'......'"
I ...................
...
II ......~~
oClO ..000.
Ii: ..........;..
...................
..
oi
.
...a...
11....00
~..
~.
~lStl!
. 0000001 III o. 001 1
: .............1 ~ ~:b 001. .
: M.................: too "'PI.. ;Olio i ~CI . . CI i
i .........~ t B I~ .uc lit. ~~ I 5 i ~
:: ...... . ... II I!
~~~~~~ k.r":":..i..i too I
: I:::::: I_Pl~~PI III~ MM. ~~I a ~ ~.
i ..IE ........~ !~..... g:" .. ::\I;~ : : ~ 5
. ...00. 1;.. .
. . . . . ., I ...0 .. LI
I . '~~~~::II; ;;;; I :"':"'llli!~~~~~~~~~~ ;
il I Id~~~~~lla ~. ..I;~;;;;;;;;:; I.
I :1 !el i iC.... :Ii; .... I! ':
: ....... ! !i .........~........I =:
..:. I 5'1-.-:::.--- .......~ .. u.PI.....~...PI..."1
........... Ea I I lellt.... -.....................
i~ i:1 -:. i~....1 E ~:. ...........!
I !1.~XIIIIII:;:. i lellt IeM .. ~1=:iiSiii!I'1
= : i!ai'.s I .."... &_1111. ...........1
i~: ": .~~~.I .......... I ...tcJ.. ...
=5:1i:::::j :;.: ;::::: E =~18 Ii
..: ti" :.: : :. c- . . . ., t:............~..~ 1 ~
~.I.~E~~JJII .~:5. _....1 ~~tE~~tEP.!i ~ !i
: :SIII~BI ~~~I 1111: I I 1.1 I I I I IS
~
~
~
IS
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
Ct;)
~
~
::s
1
JI
MEMORANDUM
February 23, 1994
File Number YS 591
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Doug Reid, Environmental Review coor~i~fftor
Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer ~'
TO:
Initial Study 94-019, EastLake Greens GDP & SPA Amendment
This is to clarify our comments (on sewers and drainage) dated
February 1, 1994 concerning the information provided in the
application for the subject Initial Study.
Our comments on drainage (Section I, A through E) noted that
project specific improvements would be required as development
occurs and further, that regional improvements in Salt Creek and
Poggi Canyon may be required as development occurs. This comment
was meant to convey that development of the overall General
Development Plan area would probably require construction of
regional level drainage improvements. Any additional development
which may occur as a result of this amendment may require greater
capacity in those facilities, but we believe that the added
capacity would be insignificant.
Our comments on Section VI, Waste Generation, noted that some
segments of the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer will be over capacity
at, or prior to, General Plan buildout conditions.
This comment addressed the fact that the EXISTING Telegraph Canyon
Trunk Sewer lacks capacity to serve the buildout development. A
Development Impact Fee (DIF) is presently in place for gravity
basin development, and a Telegraph Canyon Pumped Basin DIF will be
in place very shortly, as will a Salt Creek Basin DIF.
The parallel and upgraded facilities provided for through the
collection of these fees will be adequate for the provision of
sewer service to all of the affected development areas for as long
as necessary.
The additional development which may result from th,e proposed
amendment may have a non-significant impact on one segment of the
sewer line. That impact would be that an upgrade required by the
overall development would increase by a minor degree with the added
development. No increase in the DIF would occur.
aI.D: YSaUl
.:\HOKI\KNGIN8IR\ISt6.01'
EXHIBIT A
l
DescriPtion of Work
Assessment District 94-1
The general description of work to be funded by Assessment District 94-1 consists of the following:
1. Street improvements consisting of grading, base, paving, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and
'''''''V'lPing within the following rights-of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive - from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entranee (2,400 L.P., Phase 1).
b. South Greensview Drive - from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L.P., Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive - from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920 L.P., Phase 3).
2. Utilities and underground improvements consisting of potable water facilities, storm drain facilities,
sewer facilities, reclaimed water facilities, electric facilities, telephone facilities, gas facilities,
television facilities as appropriate by applicable state and federal statutes within the following rights-
of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive - from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400 L.P., Phase 1).
b. South Greensview Drive - from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L.P., Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive - from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920 L.P., Phase 3).
3. DIP funded street improvements consisting of grading, storm drain, base, paving, curb, gutter,
sidewalk, medians, streetlighting, landscaping and street monumentation within the following rights-
of-way:
a. Hunte Parkway _ from Clubhouse Drive to South Greensview Drive (2,300 L.P., Phase 2).
4. DIP funded street and underground improvements consisting of grading, aDd ltorm drain
improvements within the following rights-of-way: ·
a. Hunte Parkway - from South Greensview to Orange Avenue (1,270 L.P., Phase 2).
b. Orange Avenue _ from Hunte Parkway to the SDG&E easement (3,500 L.P., Phase 2).
~
WPC' p:'. \1615.114
~
. . -. ,-
_...
~(":'o r II;. r~ RU;IfJ
ruCK ENGli'tEERlNG COMPANY
S;111 Dil'PO
C:dlrurni:1 92110.2~9f1
\rl;I~" Jh'(j:~u\,' V;~',"\"1
{fll~1 291.(liOi
F.""X. u'l91 :!91~ltI~
..J
r;:-!'";. ..
. -- _.
133~!
February 7. 1994
Mr. Clifford Swanson
City of Chu1a Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista. California 91912
RE: EASTLAKE GREENS - GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND
SPA AMENDMENT (J-12347)
Dear Mr. Swanson:
This is to confirm that the storm drainage system designed for EastLake Greens has adequate
capacity to accommodate the run-off generated b)' additional areas being incorporated into
EastLake Greens SPA boundary, as shown on the attached exhibit. In addition, areas being
added do not adversely impact the drainage S)'Slem previously planned and approved as pan of
Tentative Map for Chula Vista Tract No. 88.03.
Should you have any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
, ~CK ENGIN~';'~RMPANY
P-L~
Dennis C. Bowlin~.?. R.C.E.
Director. Water Resources Division
DCB:kt.OOl
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Doug Reed, City of Chu)a Vista .
Mr. Bruce Sloan. EastLake Development Company
Mr. Houshmand Aftahi, Rick Engineering Company
."
.
F.-,
, ,
~ ""~ .
, '
Febroary 9,1994
Mr. Cliff Swanson
City Engineer
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Re: EastLake Greens Development Plan and
Spa Amendment IS.94.19
Dear Cliff:
As a part of the review of the referenced initial study the engineering
department noted possible adverse impacts to the sewer system serving the
East Lake Greens Project. As a response to this concern, I have quantified
the impact of the Plan Amendment in each of the sewer basins within the
EastLake Greens Project. This review (anached) has concluded that the
impacts of the additional development within each of the basins is minimal
when compared to previous land use and system analysis performed by the
city.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please do not
hesitate to call me.
,
Sincerely,
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Broce Sloan
Senior Project Manager
cc: Doug,Reid . Environmental Review Coordinator
J1j
...
..
EASTLAKE
DEVELOPMENt
COMPANY
900 Lone A_
Suite 100
Chuto IAsto. CA 91914
(619) 42'.0127
fA)/. (619) 421.1830
.
~
'-
SALT CREEK BASIN GRAVI1Y SEWER ANALYSIS
Sewer service to the Salt Creek Basin within the EastLake Greens
Project in cUITently provided by the Dtay Lakes Road Uft Station
(located at Dtay Lakes Road and Salt Creek) and the Telegraph Canyon
Trunk Sewer. The proposed EastLake Greens General Development
Plan and Spa Amendment affects the following parcels within the Salt
Creek Basin:
Parcel Existing Units Proposed Units Increase+/
Decrease-
R-3(south) 42 51 9
R-I0 167 246 79
R-ll 92 87 <5>
R-22 146 141 <5>
R-23 205 214 9
R-27 40 44 4
Net Change In Units 91
The flow generated by the additional 91 dwelling units (based on 250
GPD per DU) is 15.8 GPM. This amount represents an increase of
I.4D~ over the 1100 GPM flow rate assumed to be generated by the
EastLake Project within the Salt Creek Basin (see Telegraph Canyon
Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan Amendment
Incorporating Pumped Flows, Figure 8, Page II). The operation of the
Ctay Lakes Road Uft Station and Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer
should not be significantly impacted by the relatively minor increase in
the flow rate.
,.
.
.
TELEGRAPH CANYON SEWER BASIN IMPROVEMENT AND FINACIAL PLAN
The proposed General Development Plan and Spa Plan Amendment
will affect 4 par<:els (R-7, R-ll, R-14, and R-24) that are located
within the boundary of the Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer Basin. At
the time the Basin Improvement and Financing Plan was developed
EastLake Development Company and the City assumed the unit counts
proposed in the Amendment. Therefore, no modification to the
Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan is
required.
POGGI CANYON SEWER BASIN
Sewer service to the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin within the EastLake
Greens Project is currently provided by the EastLake Parkway Pump
Station and the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer. The proposed
EastLake Greens General Development Plan and Spa Amendment
affects the following parcels within the Poggi Canyon Basin:
Parcel Existing Units Proposed Units Increase+/
Decrease-
R-3(north) 42 51 9
R-14 84 86 2
R-IS 88 6S <13>
R-20 164 143 <21>
R-2S 74 78 4
R.28 27 60 33
Net Change In Units 14
The Average flow to the EastLake Parkway Pump Station (as outlined
in the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan
Amendment Incorporating Pumped Flows) is 254 GPM. At a rate of
250 gallons per day per unit the net increase in units generates an
additional 2.4 GPM. The operation of the EastLake Parkway Lift
Station and the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer should not be
significantly impacted by the relatively minor increase in flow rate.
. .:
1"'1AR- ~-94 .....ED
1':': 1 Z; CHULA ..... I STA SC:...tOCIL.
I ~:.; .r _
P.et2
IOARD Of EDUCATION
ICSEPH D. ~INGS. Ph.D.
LARRY CUNNINGHAM
SHARON G"ES
PATRIC~ A. JUDD
GREG R. SANDOVAl
SUPERINTENDENT
1I1lIAS.GIl.PII.D.
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
84 EAST "J" STREET. CHt:L<\ \'ISTA, CALJFOR!'\IA \11910 . 619425.96UO
-----.-- .- --.-.----. ---
EACH CHlI.D IS A." ISD1\'IVt:.".L OF GREAT WOHTII
March 9, 1994
Mr. Doug Reid
Environmental Review Dept.
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RE: EastLake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment
Dear Mr Reid.
The proposed GDP/SPA Arne--:dmen\ will Increase the total dwelling unit count
within EastLake Greens by 9~' units from 'L774 to 2871 At the Dlstnct-wide
average student genera\!on rate of 0.3 students/unit. tlois equates to 861 students.
It is anticipated that all ctlildrer-. fiOm EastLake Greens Including those from the
additional 97 units wili aHe1(! SchoQI No S5 which will be constructed In the
EastLake Greens Community and has a proposed opening date of July, 1995
This school is planned to cpen on a single-track year.round schedule and
eventually convert to a multi-track year.round schedule when required to
accommodate enrollment.
All elementary school facilities within the EastLake Community will be financed by
participation in Community F a::lllties Dlstnct No 1, which fully mitigates all project
impacts on schools.
If you have any questions, ple"se contact me
Sincerely,
~~ S\\.0-''-~C''''-
Kate Shurson
Director. Planning & Facilities
.'
KSdp
cc: Katy Wright
'..'8k.,"mOlld
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned (0 represent you before the City in this matter.
SB&O, Inc. : Peter "Randy" Sarino, President
SB&O, Inc. Susan K. La Plannin ~1ana er
J re ~ 1,' [20 - -r. ~ r..,.:'), C:::1;',roYl: (I, f' ( '-C f"uor! !:,
'1 r;iCi '~1 (WO I 'f('prr:~,(J ~\ .!t,.~ 1 ',"f' ') ) r~ :~, r ~r r'~ll (0' ')'( r :'~i L'(" '2.,(r:',~ 1(' l' rr'[. :,~" (';';\1 t.1. (. i
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Council \, I Y rile:,
member in the current or preceding election period? Yes [ ] No [Xl If yes, state which Council mG y, ~
member(s): 01dJ .
0, 0-
IO<k~
do-k )
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on aJ] matters which
will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies.
The following information must be disclosed:
I. List the names of all persons have a financtal interest in the contract. i.e., contractor. subcontractor,
!1)aterial sUQPlier
tastla'Ke Development Company (Owner)
Brehm Communlties (Purchaser)
2.
If any person identified pursuant to (l) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in tbe corporation or owning any partnership interest in
. the partnership.
):c()rr"€5t LD. ~r€J'I >\0\
3.
If any person identified pursuant to (I) above is non,profit organization or a trust, list the names of any
person serving as director of the non.profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustee of the trust.
4.
Have you had more than $250 wonh of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards,
Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months"
nO
5.
6.
Person is defmed as: ~ Any individual. firm, co-parmership, joint venture, associauon, social club. fraternal organization, corporalion, estate.
trust, receiver, syndicale, this and any other county, city and county, ciry. municipality, distncl or other political subdivision, or any other group
or combination acting as a unit. ~
(NOTE: Attach additionaJ pages as necessary)
Date:
~!J-7-/ 4 f
Scot Sandstrom/Brehm Communities
Print or type name of contractor/applIcant
WPC:F:\HOMEIPLANNINGISTORED\I02! -A.9J:Rc(. 1020.93) (Rd. 1022.93)
Page II