Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1990/01/09Tuesday, January 9, 1990 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Public Services Building MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Councilmembers McCandliss, Moore, Nader, and Mayor Cox ABSENT: Coanncilman Malcolm ALSO PRESENT: City Manager, John D. Goss; City Attomey, Thomas J. Harron; and City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet 2. pI.RFIGE OF AI J.I~.GIANCE TO THE FLAG, SILENT PRAYER 3. APPROVAL OF MI~: November 21, 2989, November 30, 1989, December S, 2989 and December 11, 1989 MSC (IVloore/Nader) to approve minutes of November 21, November 30, December 5, and December 11, 1990 as presented, approved 4-0-1. (Councilman Malcolm absent) Mayor Cox introduced the new Director of Community Development, Mr. Chris Salomone. He also acknowledged City Attorney, Tom Harron, who will be leaving the City to enter private practice at the end of March. Mr. Harron has been with the City for twelve years and the Mayor wished him well. 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: 4a. Presentation of 25 year Service Award pin to Jerry Foncerrada, Parks Superintendent. Councilwom- an McCandliss presented Mr. Foncerrada with a 25 year Service Award pin. Mayor Cox reviewed many of Mr. Foncerrada's accomplishments through out the last twenty-five years and stated he looked forward to many more years. Mr. Foncerrada thanked the Council and stated he was proud of his contributions to the City and improvements of programs and facilities. 4b. Presentation on Little America's Cup activities - Supervisor Brian Bilbray gave a FUndown of the effort to bring the Little America's Cup to Chula Vista and the Southbay. The committee has started media exposure. Top designers from all over the world will be involved and a local boat manufacturer, Corsair Marine, will also participate. He felt the City and Port District had demonstrated their ability to host this event. Sandy Gilson, Chula Vista Yacht Club, stated she was excited over the Little America's Cup and informed the Council that as of March 1st Chula Vista will have its own yacht club. Dave McGuigan of Lufldn Group, has been retained by the Southbay Syndicate to raise funds for the Little America's Cup. They anticipate raising $800,000 to $1 million. The marketing plan has three missions which include: 1. emphasis on community involvement, i.e., the contest to name the catamaran (3,000 MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 2 entries were submitted) and genesis of a learning center in the Chula Vista area; 2. raise the $1 million from corporate and individual contributions - the catamaran will be on a nationwide tour to promote Chula Vista and the Southbay; and 3. to get successful competition to Australia and obtain worldwide television rights. Gino Morelli stated the committee was gaining momentum. He had just returned from a nip to Australia and was surprised at the awareness and attention being given to the Litde America's Cup. He stated the compound site location and design was on schedule with construction anticipated in late January. Another formal challenge has been received from France which could result in competition before the finals. He noted that another challenge may be received from England or Italy in 1990 prior to the race in 1991. A boat has been donated to the committee and will be utilized in promotional activities. Councilwoman McCandliss questioned how critical obtaining television coverage would be and when the deadline would be for the U.S. package. Mr. McGuigan stated things were as well as could be at this time. They have received a tentative commitment for national broadcasting in Australia. He noted they would prefer ESPN and that they could syndicate the program for showing on independent stations. They curren~y have thirty sponsor packages submitted and they would wait to get maximum exposure. The first of April should see all the pieces together, they are far enough now not to cancel. Mayor Cox noted the Little America's Cup successful challenge could be intertwined with the opening in 1991 of the Nautical Port Center. He complimented the Port Commission regarding their speed in moving this project along. CONSENT CAI.I~.I',,IDAR (Items pulled: 10, 15, 18, 19, 20A, 20B, 21, 22, 23) MSC (Cox/Nader) to continue to a later date and refer to the Mobile Home Issues Committee - approved 4-0- 1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. MSC (Cox/Nader) to continue Item #1S and Item #19 to the meeting of 1/16/90 - approved 4-0-1 with Counc~man Malcolm absent, Councilwoman McCandliss questioned when the documents would be coming forth as refereed to in the Statement of Intent on Item #17. Mr. Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance, stated negotiations would take several months and it was staffs intent to keep Council informed. Councilwoman McCandliss wanted to make everyone aware of the discussion regarding the naming of the facility. Mayor Cox noted Item# 6A was an urgency ordinance and would require a 4/S's vote. COUNCILMAN MOORE OI, FP. RED THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CAI .RNDAR, the reading of the text was waived, passed and approved 44)-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. MINUTES January9,1990 Page 3 5. wl~rtmq COMMUNICATIONS: 5a. Consideration of replacement for Joseph P. Dordahl to the Board of Directors, San Diego Transit Corporation whose term expires June 30, 1990 - Bonita Tax Service, 5012 Central Avenue, Suite J, Bonita, California 92002. City Council is not directly involved in the appoinmient, suggestions should of possible individuals to be considered should be given to City MTDB Board Member. appointment. Mayor Cox thanked Mr. Dordahl for his eight years of servke and requested that anyone interested in the appointment to the Board contact Councilwoman McCandliss to submit their name. 5b. TheCalifomiaContractCitiesAssodationisinfonningofalawsuitfiledonbehalfofagroup of cities challenging the Constitutionality of the State's method of allocating property tax revenues among California cities - 3380 Flair Drive, Suite 217, E1 Monte, California 91731-2825. Recommended City not participate in this lawsuit. 5c. RequestfromPromPlarmerfora$250.OOdonationtoassistinthedefraymentofdeveloping and printing costs - 1418 Meadow Drive, National City, California 92050. Recommended that the City contribute $250.00 toward the Prom Planner Program from the City Council's contingency fund, as was provided last year. t~ 5d. C]alm~againsttheCitybyPaulV. YeagerandDennisN. Sheridan. Staffrecommendsdenial of claim. Recommended that the claims filed by Paul V. Yeaget and Dennis N. Sheridan be denied. 5e. The San Diego Apartment Association requests policies regarding the drug abatement ordinance - 1011 Camino del Rio South, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92108. Recommended that the City Attorney respond to the association's letter and indicate from a legal perspective the procedure that will be followed in this City in implementing the ordinance. 6.A. ORDINANCE 2348A AN URGENCY MEASURE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING A DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE TO PAY FOR TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN THE CITY'S EASTERN TERRITORIES (URGENCY MEASURE) - An interim measure effective for thirty (30) days. (Director of Public Works) I~ B. ORDINANCE 2349 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2251 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA I~I.&TING TO DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE TO PAY FOR TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN THE CITY'S EASTERN TERRITORIES - (second readinN) - (Director of Public Works) 7. ORDINANCE 2350 AMENDINGSECTION19.14.582OFTHECHULAVISTAMUNICIPALCODE TO REQUIRE DESIGN REVIEW FOR ALL COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES - PCA-90-2 - (second reading) - (Director of Planning) I ~ 78 ? 8.A. ORDINANCE 2351 REZONING22ACRESAT730-7S1MEDICALCENTERCOURTFROMR-1-H TO C-O-P - COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF CHULA VISTA/VISTA HILL FOUNDATION - PCZ-90-E - (second reading) - (Director of Planning) ~ 3 '~ B. ORDINANCE 2352 PREZONING l0 ACRES AT 751 MEDICAL CENTER COURT TO C-O-P - COMMUNI'IY HOSPITAL OF CHULA VISTA- PCZ-90-F - fsecond readinN) -ODirector of Planning) MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 4 d 9. RESOLUTION 15443 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO COMPI~ THE HERITAGE DIb-rRICT/ROW STUDY - For properties bounded by "I" Street, Second Avenue, "J" Street, and mid-block between Third and Del Mar Avenues. Staff recommends approval of agreement with Patrick J. Crowley - (Director of Planning) 10. RESOLUTION 1S~.'M APPROVING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SANDAG JOINT POWERS AGRRRMENT AND BY-LAWS IMPLEMENTING PROPOSITION C (REGIONAL PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT BOARD) -Amendments would establish SANDAG as the Regional Planning and Growth Management Review Board and allow for creation of a Technical Committee. Staff recommends approval - (Director of Planning) Pulled from Consent Calendar lY'Yq! 11. RESOLUTION 15445 ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, RANClIO DEL REY BUSINESS CENTER - All public improvements have been completed. Staff recommends approval - (Director of Public Works) 12. RESOLLFFION 15446 APPROVING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF THE SUBDB/ISION IMPROVE- MENT AGI~RMENT FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT 84-9, EASTlAKE I, UNIT 20 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMF2~ FOR SAID EXTENSION - Subdivider has requested a one-year extension in order to correct right-of-way problems. Staff recommends approval ofthe extension -(Director of Public Works) I~q.,' 13. RESOLUTION 15447 AC(IFFING CONTRACT WORK FOR LANDSCAPE MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS IN BONITA ROAD FROM BONITA GLEN DRIVE TO 1-805 FREEWAY IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA - All work has been completed. Staff recommends acceptance of the work - (Director of Public Works) typq¥ 14. RESOLUTION 15448 AUTHORIZING RANClIO DEL REY PARTNERSFlIP TO CONSTRUCT A PORTION OF A TRANSPORTATION FACILITY AT 1-805 AND EAST q-l' stREET IIqTERCHANGE ,AND RE~ CREDIT OR CASH REIMBURSF2vIENT AG/dNST D~PlViENT IMPACT FEE - Per Ordinance Nos. 2251 and 2289, Rancho Del Rey is requesting authorization to construct one or more of the transportation facilities. Staff recommends approval - (Director of Public Works) r~:'~'5 15. RESOLUTION 15449 APPROVINGTHET~I-RGRAPHCANYONROADSEWERMONITORINGAND GRAVITY BASIN USAGE AGR REMENT WITH EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - Agreement will provide opportunity to make connections m the sewer while assuring that properties within the gravity basin will have the ability to use the sewer capacity. Staff recommends approval of the agreement - (Director of Public Works) Continued to 1/16/90 at request of developer. /:Y?F(, 16. RESOLUTION 1,5450 APPROVING AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE PUMP STATION SERVICE TO EASTLAKE GRI~ENS CHULA VISTA TRACT 88-3 - In conjunction with the EastLake Greens development, sewer pump stations will be required on an interim basis. Agreement will provide for maintenance and operation of the temporary pump stations and payment for removal of pump stations and connection to a gravity system. Staff recommends approval of agreement - (Director of Public Works) t MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page S 17. RESOLUTION 15451 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FINANCING FOR OLYMPIC TRAINING FACILITIES TO BE DLrv'ELOPED BY 'Tile SAN DIEC0 NATIONAL SPORTS TRAINING FOUNDATION - An initial step in the financing of the Olympic Training Center. Staff recommends approval - (Director of Finance) 13 18. RESOLUTION 15452 GOLF COURSE GREEN FEE INCREASE - (Director of Parks & Recreation) Purled from Consent Calendar IY'7~ 19. RESOLUTION 15453 APPROVING LFASE AGRF. RMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE AMERICAN LEGION POST NO. 434, INC., FOR THE FACILITY LOCATED AT EUCALYPTUS pARIt,, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGRRRMENT -Agreement terminates all former agreements with the American Legion and enters into a new lease for a two-year petiod. Staff recommends approval of the agreement-(Assistant City Manager) Continued to 1/16/90. t 38,,o 20.A. REPORT CriY~ SIGN ABATEMENT PROGRAM - A fallow-up to original report submitted to Council on 1/31/89. Item continued from meeting of 12/12/89. Staff recommends that Council approve the "Citys Sign Abatement Program - Status Report and Recommendation." - (Director of Planning) Pulled from Consent Calendar }-~8~ t B. RESOLLrYION 15440 EXTENDING CONTRACT FOR PLANNING SERVICES OF MIL I/~q{JJ~t[~ F, HEITER FOR THE tiI-IY'S SIGN ABATEMENT PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATING NECESSARY FUNDS THFAL~OR - Original contract authorized by Council on 4/11/89. Item continued from meeting of 12/12/89 -(Director of Planning) Pulled from Consent Calendar l~6'o.9 21. REPORT ON AN ORDINANCE REZON1NG ALL EXISTING MOBILEHOMF/rRA[LER PARKS TO THE MHP ZONE -Rezoning of all parks which are not currently zoned as such. Staff recommends if Council desires to proceed with ordinance, it should be referred back to the Planning Commission for public hearings - (Director of Planning) Continued to a later date. 13 ~9~3 22. REPORT APPEAL TO THE COUNCIL ON PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS TO WIDEN HILLTOP DR1VE AND NAPLES STREET - Owner of shopping center at the northwest comer of Hilltop and Naples is remodeling the existing building exteriors and is required to widen the street. Request is to waive that requirement. Staff recommends denial of the request - (Director of Public Works) Pulled from Consent Calendar t~o~/ 23. P, EPORT PROPOSED ORDINANCE AIVIENq)MF2CF FOR DEVELOPNF_NT PROJECTS AFFEt.-rED BY THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE IN TIIE CENTRAL CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY - Report regarding the number of projects which are affected by the ordinance which restricts processing of projects that are inconsistent with the General Plan along with the location as well as the number of units proposed versus the number allowed. Item continued from meeting of 12/5/89. Staff recommends acceptance of report and to proceed with a Municipal Code amendment to allow for processing of these development - (Director of Planning) Pulled from Consent Calendar 1~o5 MINUTES ' January 9, 1990 Page 6 24. REPORT REQUEST BY AMKRICAN YOUTH HOS1F.&S TO CONDUCT A GRAND BICYCI.R TOUR OF FIVE ta'llES -The group is requesting permission to conduct their bicycle tour of five cities. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions of naming City as additional insured on insurance certificate, a hold harmless agreement is signed, adequate crowd and traffic control are provided at sponsor's expense, and clean-up of litter created by event -(Director of Parks & Recreation) 1~'8~{~ 25. REPORT ROHR MANOR MA:sI~.R PLAN - (Director of Parks &Recreation) 26. REPORT REGARDING ESTIMATED TIME SCHEDULE FOR PROPOSED CABLE TIll-RVISION ENABLING ORDINANCE AND FRANCHISE AGB RRMENT WITH JONES IN'I~RCABLE - (Director of Finance) ISeo~ * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBLIC HEARINGS AND }~A.TED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 27. PUBLIC HEARING PCA-90-i: CONSIDERATIONOFAMENDMENTTOCHAPTER19.58OFTHE MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT FLASHING LIGHTS - CITY INITIATED - (Director of Planning) ORDINANCE 2353 AN ORDINANCE OF THE taxY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING SECTION 19.58.410 TO THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT FLASHING LIGFrrS - (Director of Planning) 13&:~' This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox declared the public hearing open. Mr. Bob Leiter, Director of Planning, informed the Council that the Municipal Code prohibited flashing signs and the use of flashing lights as part of a sign but does not specifically prohibit flashing lights as a separate element. The adoption of the ordinance would clarify the code and would be similar to the county regulations. Planning Commission has reviewed and approve& Councilman Moore questioned the notification procedure that would be implemented and also questioned if this would become normal practice. Mr. Leiter stated the information would be distributed with business licenses. The Chamber of Commerce would also be notified. Notification would be normal procedure. There being no further public testimony, the public hearing was declared closed. ORDINANCE 2353 WAS OFFFRED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE FOR SECOND READING, the reading of the text was waived, passed and approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. 28. PUBLIC HEARING PCM-90-IM: A CITY INITIATED PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE WESTERLY SEGMENT OF RIDGEBACK ROAD TO TERRA NOVA DRIVE -Ridgeback Road currently consists of two widely separated segments. The proposal is to change the name of the westerly segment. Staff recommends approving Planning Commission recommendation to change the name of the westerly segment to Tenca Nova Drive - (Director of Planning) MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 7 RESOLUTION 15454 APPROVING PC1VI-90-04 CHANGING THE NAME OF THE WESTERLY SEGMENT OF RIDGEBACK ROAD TO TERRA NOVA DRIVE - (Director of Planning) This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox declared the public hearing open. Mr. Bob Leiter, Director of Planning, informed the Council that the proposal was to change the name of the westerly segment of Ridgeback Road. There are currently two segments with the same name which is confusing. The name Tenca Nova Drive identifies with the area and does not conflict with any existing street names. Planning Commission has recommended approval and a letter from Mr. Craig Eukuyama, Rancho Del Ray, has been received in support. There being no further public testimony, the public hearing was declared closed. Councilwoman McCandliss noted there were no residences affected by the change and questioned staff as to the development of policies so this would not happen again. Mr. Lalter stated policies had been set and these issues would be addressed at the front end of future projects. RESOLUTION 15454 WAS OH.-M1ED BY COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDLISS, reading of the text was waived, passed and approved 40-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent 29. PUBLIC HEARING PCZ-90-A-M: A eCI'IY INITIATED PROPOSAL TO REZONE CERTAIN TERRITORY GENERAILY BOUNDED BY ADA/PALOMAR STREETS, MAIN STREET, I-5/FRONTAGE ROAD AND INDUSTRIAL BOLn2'VARD TO THE EAST, FROM ITS CITY-ADOPTED COUNTY ZONE CLASSIFICA- TIONS TO ta-lY CLASSIFICATIONS UTILIT:~F~ THROUGHOUT CHULA VISTA -Staff recommends approval of the Negative Declaration and change of zones - (Director of Planning) I ~8) / ORDINANCE 2354 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA KEZONING CERTAIN TERRITORY, GENFALM.LY BOUNDED BY ADA/PALOMAR STREETS, MAIN b'tiT, INTERSTATE 5/YRONTAGE ROAD AND INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD TO THE EAST, FROM ITS CITY-ADOPTED COUNTY ZONE CLASSIFICATIONS TO CITY CI2~SSIFICATIONS UTILIZI:.D THROUGHOUT CHULA VISTA - (first reading) - (Director of Planning) This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox declared the public hearing open. Mr. Bob Leiter, Director of Planning, noted this proposal was part of the on going zoning process. Mr. Tony Lettieri, Consultant for the City, stated the request would convert the existing City adopted County zoning to City zoning classifications. These are: 1. R-V-15 to R-2-P (C-36 no change; area being further studied); and 2. M-52 to I-L-P. Recommendations are to re-adopt the Negative Declaration and adopt the ordinance to change the zones as described on Exhibit Mayor Cox asked how many of the areas were completed out of the eleven. Mr. Lettieri stated 1,2,3, and 4 (north of Palomar) were completed and 10 and 11 would slip in after 5. More research would have to be done for the industrial area. All public meetings were held a Lauderbach Center. Every property owner and those within 300 feet were notified. Community forums received a good turn out with attendance ranging from 40 to 100 people. MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 8 Mayor Cox commended staff on the approach taken and felt the final phase had been very positive in the change from County to City zoning. Mr. Rex Hoover, 2252 Main Street, #1, Chula Vista, representing the Lincoln Property Company, spoke in favor of the staff recommendation. He stated he artended the meetings and had been assured the uses would be allowed to continue. Mr. Pass had stated he was not trying to change the uses but only continue the existing. Ms. Sherri Todus, 6001 Bonita Meadows Lane, Bonita, spoke in opposition of the staff recommendation. She recommended no change at this time. Mr. Dan Pass, Principal Planner, stated there were five parcels in the special study area and that staff was concerned regarding potential commercial property. He noted staff needed further time to study this area. Staff is continuing to survey the area and are working with the property owners. This is not a high priority item. Mayor Cox questioned whether an owner who wanted to pursue redevelopment as commercial zoning had anything that would preclude them from doing so. Mr. Pass stated no, they could file for an amendment for special plan. Mr. Pat O'Connell, 746 Ada Street, Chula Vista, stated he is located directly across from the Palomar Trolley Station and had not been informed of the community meetings. He wanted to know the impact on his property. Mr. Pass stated it would change from R-V-15 m R-2-P which would be almost a direct translation. The R-2-P zoning would have a greater advantage for development by allowing more various dwellings. There being no further public testimony, the public heating was declared closed. ORDINANCE 2354 WAS OP'P-P. RF.D BY MAYOR COX FOR FIRST RFADING, reading of the text was waived, passed and approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. OTHER BUSINESS 30. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 30a. Diane Taylor, 639 Waterview, Spring Valley, representing Girls and Boys Club of Chula Vista, informed the Council she was the new Child Care Director. The Board of Directors had committed to provide service to the City and was licensing and opening a pre-school on February 5, 1990. Ages of children will be from 2 1/2 to 5 years and the center will be open from 7 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The cost will be the lowest in Chula Vista at $55 per week. They will be having an open house and Ms. Taylor extended an invitation to the Council. 30b. Carol Freno, 3703 Alta Loma Drive, Bonita, representing Crossroads, expressed her concern regarding an article that appeared in the 12/19/89 issue of the San Diego Tribune regarding the Bayfront Developer. She supported placement on the agenda of this item due to the serious concerns expressed in the article over the selection of the developer. She questioned when the Council would issue a statement of selection and address the points ou~ined in the article. /~IP, MINUTES January9, 1990 Page 9 Councilwoman McCandliss stated this could be discussed at an Agency meeting and noted the Council did not select the developer, the developer bought the land. Discussion could take place on the background investigation that occurred. Ms. Freno stated her concerns were over the background investigation. 30c. Victor A. Nolan, 12 Via Barberini, Chula Vista, representing Chula Vista Mobile Home Park, stated he had received a sewer/water bill for $2.07 and thanked the Council for their expedient attention to this matter. He felt it was also important to recognize City staff for their work. 31. I'rEMS pUIJ.I~D FROM THE CONSENT CAI.I~IqDAR Iteln #18. RESO LUT[ON 15452 GOLF COURSE GIII~RN FEE INCREASE Mr. Manuel Mollinedo, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated the Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously approved the request on 12/21/89, A representative of the Chula Vista Men's Golf Club was also at the meeting and supported the fee adjustment. Mayor Cox questioned whether all agreements for improvements by the American Golf Corporation had been met. Mr. Mollinedo stated all improvements had been completed except the channel. It was in progress and expected to be completed with the next two months. Johnny B, Gonzales, 6334 Streamview, San Diego, representing American Golf Corporation, spoke in favor of staff recommendation. He noted that all improvement projects would be completed later this month. He stated they had the support of the Chula Vista Men's Golf Club. He also thanked the staff for their assistance and support. He felt the request for increased fees made them comparable to other courses in the area. Mayor Cox questioned whether other courses offer senior cards. Mr. Gonzahs stated very few have senior cards or senior rates. He stated they try to take of the seniors in Chula Vista. Councilman Moore stated the requested increases could be compared by dollar mount or percentage. If utilizing percentage, they would receive a pretty good increase. He felt staff should utilize percentage as part of the process when considering increases. Mr. Gonzales stated they were asking fair and comparable rates and noted the comparisons of other municipal courses in the area. Steve Harker, 5116 Avenida Playa Cancun, San Diego, representing American Golf Corporation, spoke in favor of staff recommendation. He noted they had originally requested Martin Luther King Day to be designated as a holiday and informed the Council that they wished to drop the request. Councilwoman McCandliss noted the recommended increases were comparable and questioned whether play was also comparable. Mr. Harker stated it was and noted that more revenue was put back in the facility than required. He further noted their contract stated they could request comparable rates. MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 10 Don O'Brien, 4201 Bonita Road, #134, Bonita, spoke in favor of the staff recommendation. He stated seniors are not treated as well at other courses and felt it was a modest increase for the types of services given. George Rauzon, 426 Hilltop Drive, Chula Vista, spoke in favor of the staff recommendation. He noted the major improvements American Golf Corporation had done, along with upgrading, made the course competitive with any in the county and it would still be one of the least expensive. Cliff Roland, 1100 T-6 Industrial Boulevard, Chula Vista, Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission spoke in favor of the staff recommendation. He stated the original $1.00 fee was a surcharge added to designate ticket holders on the cash register receipts. He supported the increase on the ticket but requested the surcharge be left a $1.00, Mayor Cox noted the City had experienced a loss of approximately $96,000 over a ten year period when golf course operation was under the City. Now, with the lease between the City and American Golf Corporation, the City is guaranteed a minimum and a percentage of green fees, which now covers the bonds and results in additional revenues of approximately $70,000. The agreement was to allow them to be competitive and with the increase they are requesting, they will still be below average. He complimented American Golf Corporation on the work they have done. Councilwoman McCandliss felt the fee request was reasonable and noted the course is in better shape. She also felt American Golf Corporation had met their obligations. She was glad to hear of the treatment the seniors were receiving. She commended the Parks and Recreation Commission for the detailed information and felt they had gone over and above what was required of them. Councilman Moore expressed his concern over the 100% increase of the $1.00 surcharge. He felt the other fee increases were appropriate. MSC OVIoore/McCandliss) m amend Resolution 15452 m keep the $1.00 surcharge as is and increase all other fees as recommended by the Parks and Recreations Commission and staff. Approved 3-1-1 with Mayor Cox voting no and Councilman Malcolm absent. Mayor Cox stated that American Golf had performed as asked and he felt the package should be approved as recommended. He did not feel $2.00 was out of line and he would vote against the motion. RESOLUTION 15452 WAS OfftiERED BY COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDLISS, reading of the text was waived, passed and approved 3-1-1 (Cox voting no and Malcolm absent). Item 20A. REPORT CITY'S SIGN ABATEMENT PROGRAM Mr. Ken Lee, Principal Planner, noted this item had been continued from 12/12/89. The Broadway Association, Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Business Association had all been furnished a list of nonconforming signs. Thomas Davies, 4501 Otay Valley Road, Chula Vista, representing Boradway Businessman's Association, spoke in opposition of staff recommendation. He stated the businessmen have worked hard in the past to improve the area. He noted they had a poor response on this issue and that they had requested a listing from the City months prior to receiving one on 12/21/89. The Association had the following recommenda- tions/requests: 1. Notification of all non-compliance businesses of the Sign Abatement Program. 2. Notification of all potential buyers of the non-compliance businesses. MINLrrES January 9, 1990 Page 11 3. A five year extension for businesses in non-compliance. He felt ff given these changes to the staff recommendation, compliance could be accomplished within the next five years with the least financial impact to the City or businessman. Mayor Cox questioned whether the appeal would be to the City Council. Mr. Lee stated it would. Mayor Cox stated he could not support a five year extension of the abatement period and questioned if anything precluded a businessman from appealing. Mr. Lee stated they would be appealing actual conforraance or non conformance of the ordinance and staff anticipated few appeals. Mayor Cox questioned whether a potential buyer would be apprised of non-conforrnance. Mr. Lee stated the sign program is discussed at the counter when a business license is obtained. If the license is obtained through the mail it would not be discussed. Mayor Cox stated the City needed to be more aware, licenses should be flagged. He was not opposed to a process in which staff would evaluate and make a determination for a one year hardship extension. Councilman Moore voiced the same concerns and felt the landlord had an obligation to notify the buyer. He supported the one year hardship extension if the business provided the City with proposed signage and it was approved and on file when the one year extension was granted. He noted this would provide flexibility between the Broadway Association request and the lack of a system at the City level. Councilwoman McCandliss felt it was reasonable to implement but questioned whether the City would be inundated with one year requests. Mayor Cox noted it would have to be a hardship request. Mr. Lee stated staff could draft an ordinance and have Planning Commission hold a public hearing, review and bring back to Council. MSC (Cox/Nader) refer back to staff to develop process for a one year hardship extension for circumstances developed by staff. Process is to include the submittal of proposed signage and approval on file before a one year hardship extension is granted. Approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. Item 20B. RESOLUTION 15440 ~ING CONlqLt~CT FOR PLANNING SERVICES OF MtL WILLIAM F. HEITER FOR THE CI1YS SIGN ABATEMENT PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATING NECESSARY FUNDS THEREFOR RESOLUTION 1S~, ~,00FIqdRF. D BY MAYOR COX, reading of the text was waived, passed and approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. Councilwoman McCandliss stated this had been a difficult issue and she felt giving a one year hardship extension gave flexibility to the program and gave the businessman his day in court. MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 12 '; Item 22. REPORT APPEAL TO THE COUNCIL ON PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS TO WIDEN HILLTOP DRIVE AND NAPLES STREET Mr. Cliff Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director, stated the Planning Commission has reviewed and denied the waiver. Mayor Cox questioned the ownership of the shopping center. Mr. Swanson stated to the best of staffs knowledge, the L shape was all under one ownership. He noted it was a very busy intersection with a large number of turning movements. Councilwoman McCandliss questioned whether the widening was only m facilitate turning movements. Mr. Swanson stated it was. Mr. Nader stated he was under the impression that the widening was to accommodate growth and expressed his concern over the owner being charged the cost of a development that was listed down the road in the General Plan. He wanted to again be assured it was strictly to accommodate turning movements. Mr. Swanson stated it was for turning movements and that there were no plans in the immediate or foreseeable future to do anything at Hilltop. Councilman Moore noted that shopping centers attract more traffic and it was routine for staff to come back for widening when improvements were made. Mr. Swanson stated the project was in the preliminary stages and the restriping would be ~nalized with the construction plans. He felt it would be similar to Southlake but felt it could be improved. The center turn land could be carried back, a smaller than standard right turn lane could be installed, and bus stops could be on the widened sections. Tim Jones, 978 Myra Avenue, Chula Vista, designer retained by Jay Pugh, property owner spoke in opposition of staff recommendation. He stated the City was placing an undue burden on the owner and felt the ordinance should be revised to reflect 1990 dollars. He felt the intent was vague and staff was misrepresenting the code. He noted the costs of improvements versus the burden of street widening was unfair. If the Council granted a deferral, his client would post a cash bond in the amount of the improvements. Mayor Cox questioned whether the improvements would be required on the Naples side if redeveloped. Mr. Swanson stated that was correct. MSC (Cox/McCandliss) AMENDMENT to allow a three year defetral or until adjoining shopping canter is built on Naples property - which ever comes ftrsL Stuff is to report back any additional land needed to to widen the streeL Approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. Mayor Cox noted that Mr. Jones had a valid request regarding the $10,000 figure in the ordinance. He stated there was a time when aesthetic improvements could trigger a much more expensive improvement. MSC (Moore/Nader) to direct staff to review Section 12.24.040 of the Municipal Code and the base figure that triggers public improvements and bring back to Council any adjusunent recommended. This should be reviewed annually. Approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 13 Item 23. REPORT PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AP'p'hCTED BY THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE IN THE CEN'I1AL CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY Mr. Bob Leiter, Director of Planning, stated the report was in response to the Council request of the November 7th meeting regarding those projects which were submitted to the Planning Department for preliminary design review consideration after the adoption of the General Plan and were not informed that the General Plan affected their development proposal. To the best of staffs knowledge, only six projects fit into this category. If the Council concurred on the proposed ordinance it would then go to the Planning Commission for public hearing and then back to Council. Councilwoman McCandliss questioned where the project would go if released. Mr. Leiter stated it would go to the Design Review Committee and stafffor review. Discretion would be with the Design Review Committee. Councilwoman McCandliss stated she had a problem with the projects due to review and evaluation. She noted that in many areas they were shifting zoning to protect the integrity of the neighborhoods. The projects deserved evaluation and from what she was hearing, this wasn't going to happen. Mr. Leiter stated Councilwoman McCandliss was correct and that the Design Review Committee did not have the authority to change density. Councilwoman McCandliss stated she was uncomfortable with granting a blanket release without granting discretion to the Planning Director. Councilman Moore stated he had the same concerns but also felt the developer with a project in the pipeline should be able to know what he can or can not do with his property. He felt this was only the tip of the iceberg but stated he could support the staff recommendation. Councilman Nader requested clarification as to whether these projects would get a decision before the Planning Commission or the Council down the road. Mr. Leiter stated they would only appear before the Design Review Committee and staff for review. Councilman Nader stated he was not comfortable with this due to several reasons. He was not sure all qualify as true pipeline projects and noted there were reasons for downgrading projects and felt Council or Commission should retain some level of discretion. Hector Zuniga, 82nd Fourth Avenue, Chnla Vista, spoke in favor of the staff recommendation. He stated his project was different. He purchased his property 4-5 months ago and the information received was that the property was R-3 zoning. He found out about the change in the General Plan Update only when he submitted his plans. He stated he wanted to upgrade the property and he would not build something different than was existing. Sidney Morris, 862 Cedar Avenue, Chnla Vista, spoke in opposition to the staff recommendation. He stated he owned property on 228 & 224 G Street, 221 Del Mar and had an option to purchase the property at 236 G Street. He stated he started acquiring these properties in 1975 with the intent to build multifamily dwelling units. This project was not in the pipeline because plans had not been submitted but he stated he had a very definite financial interest. He felt property owners should be considered as being in the pipeline. His property will be approximately one acre and his property estimated at approximately $440,000. With the change in zoning he felt his property value wonld drop to $200,000 or less. He felt what the Council did was not right and possibly illegal and that owners should have pipeline rights. MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 14 Mayor Cox questioned staff whether they had seen an overview of the property. Mr. Leiter stated they had not, there was no specific development proposal submitted. Jacques J. ShadIcy, 4239 Mt. Castle Avenue, San Diego, spoke in opposition to staff recommendation. He stated the property at 236 G Street had been bequeathed to him by his father. If Mr. Morris' request to be treated as a pipeline project was denied, he would suffer a large financial blow on the sale of this property. He felt the property owner should be included in the pipeline process and should have been notified of the intent of the Council so they could have responded accordingly. Councilwoman McCandliss felt with the Mort-is situation that when Council was doing the General Plan, they relied on the staff to create neighborhoods and did not do the noticing and probably would fee the same way, that government was trying to pull something. She agreed with the overall intention of what they were trying to create. It would seem that there may be some projects, like this one, that should be reviewed for a rezone consideration due to the financial impact but noted it was going to take time. She questioned whether, due to the costs involved, it would be possible to give it a repass. She felt there should be some type of rezone review. City Attorney Harron stated the City was going to have to do a rezone themselves even if they are not ready for a review of their of plan. Councilwoman McCandliss questioned if it could be taken one step further and waive the fees. Mr. Morris stated he purchased the property on a per unit cost. He was not able to tell how much he could pay for it until he knew what he could do on the property. He stated he only had an agreement on the property for one year and it was based on per unit cost. He stated an owner should be able to depend on the zoning. Mayor Cox stated he could tell Mr. Morris that with the action the Council had taken, he was allowed two units per acre. Mr. Morris stated he had planned to leave the existing five unit building and construct a new project on the 80 X 200 ft. parcel. The rest of the property would be left as open space. Mr. Leiter stated the Planning Department would be back before Council in March regarding the inconsistencies. Councilman Moore stated he felt these projects should be placed in the pipeline rather than being left in limbo. Property owners should be able to depend on zoning. Mr. Leiter stated the March report is to list the inconsistencies, what they are, and means to resolve them. James Osbum, 506 Caselman, Chula Vista, spoke in opposition to staff recommendation. He stated his project was one of the six listed in the pipeline. He stated he has gone through everything and has been approved and now he was being required to go through the Design Review process. He stated it has already taken seven months and the delay was costing him money. He was given approval at the counter and told no when he submitted his plans. He requested his project be granted the opportunity to continue on without further review. He noted his project was not different than the existing projects on the other three corners. He was not sure how much longer he could continue. Councilman McCandliss requested clarification of the third paragraph on page one of the ordinance amendment. MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 15 Mr. Leiter stated it required review at the staff level and required staff to see if the project would prejudice the overall intention of the General Plan and densities in the neighborhoods. Councilwoman McCandliss stated that the project would not only go before the Design Review Board but would also be reviewed by staff regarding the General Plan. Mr. Leiter stated he was not aware of this section in the current ordinance but it did stipulate the Director of Planning. MSC (Nader/McCandliss) to approve the staff report as submivted. Approved 3-1-1 with Councilwoman McCandliss voting no and Councilman Malcolm absent. Counc~man Nader stated the Design Review dealt with architectural design and not land use impacts on the neighborhood and he felt these should be reviewed by the Planning Commission. He also felt the property owners should be notified. AMENDMENT TO MOTION: Projects in the pipeline would be subject to review by the Planning Commission with no fees charged to the owner. AMENDMENT DIED: 2-2-1 Councilmembers McCandliss and Nader voting yes, Mayor Cox and Councilman Moore voting no, and Councilman Malcolm absent_ Mr. Leiter stated they would have to amend the language in the ordinance and would be required to notice land owners if the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The Commission would be required to make the same type of decisions as the ordinance currently requires of th zoning administrator. Councilwoman McCandliss stated it should be the same process and noted the conditional use permits as an example. The Council is notified of the decision and the Council then has the ability to appeal the decision if desired. She expressed her desire to have the Council views carded through during staff review, with the Council being contacted regarding the decision and then giving the Council the opportunity to appeal. MSC (Cox/McCandliss) to refer to staff with report back to Council in February to include the two specific projects (Monis and Osburn). Approved 4-0-1 with CouDeilman Malcolm absent. Mr. Leiter stated there would be no problem in returning to Council in February with the report. Counc~man Nader stated that if projects were being singled out, he would like the project he refereed to Nancy Woods included and felt the motion should be expanded to include any properly owner who has come forward with their concerns. Owners should not be penalized just because they have not come forward at this time. Councilwoman McCandliss stated staff should move forward with these two and address the other accordingly. Councilman Nader stated he had been approached by this property owner three months ago and was told he should turn the referral over to staff. Councilman Moore stated he had a problem with the motion and preferred that staff would expedite the report back to Council and include all projects. Mayor Cox questioned whether the motion would slow down the process for the Planning Deparunent. MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 16 Mr. heiter stated it would and felt the Council may want to wait for the General Plan amendment versus other actions. He felt they could be setting a precedent. It was important to look at the whole picture rather than taking action on individual parcels. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION: MSC (Cox/Moore) to withdraw previous motion to include the two properties in the report and to expedite the report before March if possible. Approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. MSC (McCandliss/Cox) that Council be notified of Zoning Adrnirfislrator's decision on any projecB within the pipdine. Appreved 4-0-1 with Cmmeflman Malcolm absent. Item 10. RESOLUTION 1S~,~.~, APPROVING PROPOSED AMF2~MENTS TO SANDAG JOINT POWERS AGI~F.F, MFAN'T AND BY-LAWS IMPLF_aMF2qTING PROPOSITION C (REGIONAL PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT BOARD) Councilwoman McCandliss stated she did not have a problem with the Resolution before Council but hoped that the Board would not fall into old habits and loyalties often seen on the SANDAG boards. She was concerned it would be a board controlled by the county and the City of San Diego. Every member should bring openness and sensitivity to the Board in order to avoid polarization of the projects that will be before them. All should have a spirit of cooperation in order to work toward and promote regional planning. Mayor Cox stated he had served on the SANDAG Board for the last eight years and felt it was a suitable environment for meaningful dialogue. He had not seen the concerns raised by Councilwoman McCandliss or any intimidation by the County or City of San Diego. He noted that several cities had returned to the SANDAG Board within the last two to three years and that original jitters had gone by the wayside. Councilman Nader raised the airport issue as an example and felt Councilwoman McCandliss had raised some real concerns. Councilman Moore stated he could not see a regional planning effort under anyone other than SANDAG. He felt they were one of the best agencies in the county as they dealt basically with statistics. He did not feel the City of San Diego held an edge and from everything he had observed, all other communities held their own very well. RESOLUTION 1EA. Ad. WAS OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDHSS, reading of the text was waived, passed and approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. Mayor Cox informed the Council that Councilman Nader's request to extend an invitation to Tijuana to serve as an ex-officio member had been done. The Port District had also been extended an invitation to participate as an ex-of~cio member. 32. CITY MANAGERS REPORT(S) 32a. City Manager Goss stated the Council had been informed of all scheduled meetings. 33. MAYOR'S REPORT(S) J MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 17 33a. Mayor Cox refereed to correspondence received from the City of San Diego requesting the City's membership in the Global Cities/Earth Day 1990 project. 13813 MSC (CoX,,'Nader) to refer to staff to designate a staff member to participate in Global Cities/Earth Day 1990 projecL Approved 44)-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. Councilmen Nader expressed his desire for the City to have a program of its own regarding Earth Day. He did not feel that the best possible service for the City would be obtained through the City of San Diego. He requested that staff contact Stanford University and report back to the City Council on projects for the City. 34. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilwoman McCandliss: 34a. Stated she had talked with a realtor regarding the resale of a home and in talking about the price she inquired about the Mello Roos. The realtor did not know what it was. She stated there had been many public hearings and meetings which dealt with public concerns and Counc~ had modified the ordinance regarding new sales. She questioned staff if there was anything the books impacting resales so people would be aware of what they were getting into. /~8/~ MSC (McCandliss/Cox) to refer to staff to look at and brin~ back any necessary amendments that would ensure that new home owners are given the same rights as resale owners. Approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. 34b. Expressed her concern over the tree removal plan at Rohr Park. She felt the striping of the trees was an affront to the area and felt it was possible to save some of the trees and still create the goal of the baseball fields, soccer fields, and picnic areas. This would also preserve the rural characteristic of the park. MS (McCandliss/Nader) to refer this item back to staff with report back to Council within thirty days. Costs involved regarding dirt brought in for the project should be included. Mayor Cox stated he was against the motion and noted the Rohr master plan had been evolving the last 5-6 years. He could appreciate the desire to maintain mature trees but those at the park were brittle and he felt there was a possible safety hazard. He also noted a problem with security due to the seclusion of the area, He would rather put more money into the project for larger trees which would result in quicker recovery. Due to input received and extensive public participation he felt the project should move forward. Councilwoman McCandliss stated the public input dealt with uses and services and felt the public did not realize what the approval of the master plan would bring until the graphic was presented. She felt any delay would be insignificant. Councilman Moore stated mature eucalyptus trees were dangerous and questioned whether review would take thirty days. Mr. Manuel Mollinedo, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that if the decision to keep two rows of trees was made, it would necessitate redoing the grading plan and delay the project by approximately four months. The grading would soften the slope in order to make it usable, as it is very steep. Councilwoman McCandliss felt the trees could be thinned out for picnic areas without tremendous land formation changes. MINUTES January 9, 1990 Page 18 VOTE ON MOTION: Approved 3-1-1 with Mayor Cox voting no and Councilman Malcolm absanL Councilman Nader: 34c. Stated he had attended the Chula Vista 2000 workshop and it was apparent there was a shortage of child care in Chula Vista. He felt a recommendation should come before the Council, ptior to the issuance of the report, for the creation of a Child Care Commission. t3&2~ MS (Nader/Moore) to direct staff to prepare an ordinance to create a Child Care Comrni~sion with seven members to be appointed by the Mayor and ratified by the Counc~. Staff is to work with the Chairman of the Chula Vista 2000 subcommittee. Mayor Cox stated this should be refereed back to the Chula Vista 2000 subcommittee to draft a report for the Council including proposed structure and area of responsibility. Councilman Nader felt it should be refereed back to the subcommittee and staff to work with the City Attorney in order to draft an ordinance for Council consideration. Councilman Moore stated the commissions work for the Council and staff advises Council. If forming an ad hoc committee, don't go to staff. He felt the committee could accomplish the same thing without going to staff and noted that every commission was created by an ordinance. Councilwoman McCandliss felt the Day Care Task Force had done an excellent job and noted the Cultural Arts Committee had also recommended the formation of a commission. City Manager Goss informed the Council that the Steering Committee was meeting on Thursday to review the report and hoped to meet with the Council at the January or February workshop. He noted that the Chula Vista 2000 subcommittees had recommended the formation of a Charter Committee but he felt the ordinance process made more sense. Mr. Jim Thomson, Deputy City Manager, stated the consultant felt the final report would be ready for printing at the end of February with distribution in early to mid March. Councilman Nader stated he felt there was no reason to wait for the report before a commission was formed on child care and noted there was a critical need in the City. Councilwoman McCandliss stated she understood there was a need but felt there would be other groups that would be recommending the formation of a commission. Councilman Nader felt that this particular commission should not have to wait the three to four months until the report was issued. Councilman Moore felt it should be left in the hands of the Chula Vista 2000 subcommittees and directed staff to prepare a package of a similar ordinance, purpose, etc. with information being forwarded to the City Attorney to draft an ordinance for Council review. Staff should use existing data that would cover any committee request to form a commission. Councilman Nader stated he was willing to include other requests but wanted to make clear that if ready, the child care ordinance could come back early and not have to wait until the report was released. MINUTES January9,1990 Page 19 Mayor Cox stated they were in the last phases of the final report and he would rather see all of the subcommittee reports. Included in the fmal report should be recommendations and how a commission is to be structured, selected and with a draft ordinance if appropriate. Councilman Nader stated that sounded longer than the end of March. SUBSTITUTE MOTION: MSC (Cox/Moore) to ask the Chula Vista 2000 subcommittees to include within their recommendations specific composition, responsl"oilities, how persons should be selected and purpose of their proposed commission. Approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent. Councilwoman McCandliss stated that if the information was prepared before the final report the subcommittee could come to the Council. Mayor Cox stated that was always their option. Councilman Nader requested that the staff provide assistance to the subcommittees if needed. IT WAS THE CONSENSUS OF THE COUNCIL THAT THIS BE INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION. Councilman Moore again requested that staff provide the Chula Vista 2000 subcommittees sample ordinances, etc. in order to assit the subcommittees and help them expedite the process. ADJOURNMENT The City Council/Redevelopment Agency adjourned to closed session at 10:20 p.m. to discuss: a. Potential acquisition of properties: 4S55 Otay Valley Road (Shell Oil Co., owner); 4501 Otay Valley Road (Roderick & Patricia Davies, owners); Parcel 624-060-27 on Otay Valley Road (Vincent & Margaret Davies, owners; 4705 Otay Valley Road (Jimmie & Judi Shinohara, owners); Parcel 644-040-40 (Walker Scott Properties/South Bay, owner); Parcel 624-040-45 (Atomic Investments, Inc., Leonard Teyssier, owner); East H Street - Paseo Del Rey and Tierra Del Rey b. Pending litigation: Kipnis vs. City of Chula Vista and County vs. Rabin c. Potential litigation: Transfer of property - application for franchise agreement with Jones Intercable d. Personnel matters ADJOURNMENT AT 11:15 p.m. to the regular City Council Meeting to be held on January 16, 1990 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. Respectfully submitted, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CMC, City Clerk by: ~ ~ e t ~ ' Vicki Soderquist, Deputy CilW Clerk