HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1992/11/12 (6)
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of November 12, 1992
Page 1
1.
PUBLIC HEARING:
GPA-92-01 and PCZ-92-B: Proposal to amend the
Montgomery Suecific Plan/Chula Vista General Plan and
rezone approximately 1/3 acre located in southwesterly
quadrant of West Main Street and Del Monte A venue. from
"Low/Medium Density Residential" and R-I-6-P to
"Research and Limited Industrial" and I-L-P (Margarita
Romero-applicant)
A. BACKGROUND
1. The subject request is an application for the redesignation of a certain 1/3-acre
site located in the southwesterly quadrant of West Main Street and Del Monte
Avenue from "Low/Medium Density Residential" to "Research and Limited
Industrial," and the rezoning of the said site from "R-I-6-P" to "I-L-P".
2. The proposed Montgomery Specific PlanlGeneral Plan Amendment and rezoning
would enable the applicant to submit project plans for the development of the site.
No specific proposal has been submitted by the applicant as of this date.
3. Environmental Review
An Initial Study, IS-92-39, of possible adverse environmental impacts of the
project was conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator on June 1,
1992. The Environmental Review Coordinator concluded that there would be no
significant environmental effects, and recommended that the Negative Declaration
be adopted.
4. In addition, due to the possibility of toxins present in the soil from the site's
previous use as a contractor's roofing yard, a Phase I Hazardous Waste
Assessment must be conducted prior to any future development of the site.
Development of the parcel will also be subject to precise plan review, at which
time the Phase I Hazardous Waste Assessment will be required.
B. RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached resolution which recommends that the City Council approve the
attached draft City Council Resolution approving the General Plan and Montgomery
Specific Plan Amendments and Rezone based on the findings and subject to the
conditions therein.
j- /
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of November 12, 1992
Page 2
OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Montgomery Planning Committee will review the proposed GPA-92-01 on
November 10, 1992.
C. BASIC INFORMATION
I. Subject Property
The subject land is designated "Low/Medium Density Residential" on the plan
diagram of the Montgomery Specific Plan and Chula Vista General Plan. The
subject property's designation was converted from "Limited Impact Industrial"
under the San Diego County General Plan to "Low/Medium Density Residential"
upon the adoption of the Montgomery Specific PlanlChula Vista General Plan in
198811989 respectively.
2. Adjacent General Plan Designations (please see Exhibit A).
North:
South:
East:
West:
Research & Limited Industrial
Low/Medium Density Residential
Low/Medium Density Residential
Research & Limited Industrial
3. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use (please see Exhibit B).
North:
South:
East:
West:
I-L-P
R-I-6-P
R-I-6-P
I-L-P
Industrial
Single-family dwellings
Single-family dwellings
Industrial
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study, IS-92-39, of potential
environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the project. Based on the
attached Initial Study and comments thereof, if any, the Coordinator has concluded that
j.- q
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of November 12, 1992
Page 3
there would be no significant environmental impacts, and recommends adoption of the
Negative Declaration issued on IS-92- 39.
E. ANALYSIS
1. The subject site is presently a legal non-conforming use. The project area is
presently used for storage purposes.
This property is located at the southwesterly quadrant of Main Street and Del
Monte Avenue, and is not an integral part of the single-family fabric to east of
said interface. The adjacent uses consist of an auto salvagelstorage business at
the southwestern terminus of this property and a single-family residential
subdivision to the immediate east. To the north is an auto sales establishment,
while an industrial storage yard lies to the west. The site is not suitable for
single-family residential development.
2. The land to the east of the proposed project site is a single-family subdivision,
better known as Whitington's Subdivision No. 10. The subject area's suburban
character, subject to the impacts of adjacent non-residential uses, and should be
protected through the establishment of a Precise Development Plan as well as the
application of Design Review Procedures. Please see Attachment A for the
proposed design review standards to be applied to this property.
F. CONCLUSION
The proposed Montgomery Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment would not adversely
affect the single-family dwelling fabric, provided the recommendations, as outlined
elsewhere in this report, are part and parcel of the overall amendment and rezoning.
(&pa92-1H .p<)
/-3
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE A
PRECISE PLAN FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 19.56.041 of the Zoning Ordinance, the following circumstance is evident
which allows application of the "P" Precise Plan modifying district to this site.
The property or area to which the P modifying district is applied is an area adjacent and
contiguous to a zone allowing different land uses, and the development of a precise plan will
allow the area so designated to coexist between land usages which might otherwise prove
incompatible.
This circumstance applies to this property, due to the adjacent residentially designated and zoned
areas to the south and east of the project site.
/..- 1-1
ATIACHMENT A
PAGE B
"P" DISTRICT REGULATIONS FOR
PRECISE PLAN MODIFIER
In order to effectuate the implementation of the proposed rezoning (I-L-P) the following
constitute the district regulations and design standards and guidelines shall be adhered to by any
Precise Plan submitted to develop the property.
Design Standards and Guidelines:
. Building heights, placement and color of structures shall compliment existing neighboring
structures.
. Service entries and loading areas shall be shielded from public view and adjacent
residential areas by being placed towards the rear and non-public view sides of the
building.
. Entry into the property from Del Monte Avenue shall be located at the northerly end of
the parcel so as to minimize friction between residential and industrial traffic.
. Glare to surrounding residential areas shall be minimized through use of directional
lighting for illumination of parking and loading areas.
. A solid masonry 6 ft. high wall shall be constructed along the interior and rear property
lines.
. Fencing design shall reflect the building architecture in materials and articulation.
. Signage review shall be integrated into the overall site and architectural design process
in order to coordinate signage design with the building architectural style, colors,
materials and landscaping.
. All roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened or otherwise kept from public view.
Screening and shield elements shall be integrated within the overall building design.
. Service, utility, trash collection and parking lot areas shall be screened from view (public
streets, parking areas, pedestrian walks, etc.) by permanent walls and landscaping.
Screening walls and landscaping shall be integrated with respect to forms and materials
with the surrounding architecture and architecture of the main building.
. The area between the wall and the edge of the sidewalk shall be permanently landscaped.
Such landscaped area shall be provided with an automatic irrigation system and shall be
permanently maintained and kept free of debris.
/ - 5
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE C
. The Zoning Administrator could require construction of a 6-foot high decorative masonry
wall across the entire frontage width of the parcel, if deemed necessary, for visual
screening and noise attenuation purposes. The use of buildings near the parcel frontage
may eliminate some of the need for front fencing.
Said wall should be constructed at a minimum of 20 feet behind the front property line.
. All mitigation measures identified in the Negative Declaration (1S-92-42) must be
complied with.
wpa92.0J .pc)
/-~
~[]]]J]]]TI~ 'I rrmiliTI
<.:.:.:.:.:.:.: STR T . ., '.' '
~ :::t::::: ~ 11111 I I. .111 . rrrITmTTl '\\~.:-.....;
::::.:::::: Ul..l.llJll.J.J . ':--':"OTAY
HIIIIIJ]J.DIIJI[[[]]' .', .,- , '
. . . \,:'..~,~:~<~~)
~~ i~NTGOMf I i~DJII]]]]]]
I ;:::I::::::::::~::::::::::: I~ l' cDilTlTT1'TTi11
II ~ -hZENITH ::l:}:~:~:::~::::::::. STREET' Z Dl.ll.1LW.LW
'i ~ /;{1tJ:; II ~ r~v~ ,;~;; ~I;;v~~ ;I;~AI
~////////;. // :i/////::////// ,,////ij////////~ ';/////
%~/[:0%;~ ~ ;e- ,: ~%%
~~~//~0/~ /~% [. ~~ i ~ %%
"--'.',.,: .,';'':1''., --","":',:..:,' 11, I //V<:/,0.t ///
- ,.,- ~ __~ I ~_......"..., '.I~ .;.__-,~ ..I_~ _)- (//
..,. ..... ~..._~-'.-_..-'~::'=-:_~-',r.l..J;;_;'_-':.....>~_~._~;,:'..::', -' k<',_O'J:_:' ...._::...!_~~::'_.
I ,..,;.. --' -- . . ' , " -','- .- ,'-, - " .'" . . ',' ,'., . J'''' ,
I cP -.) ._~ ": ~.'. -,,_ -, t.: ',) ....._-- '..... ~:~~-~-.J.:-
W I I IT LAN D't 's" ,-:.,_:':C.:",~~
1- -- ~--.......... I I'
"ITY 'OF CHULA VIS~ ,_
-r - - - - -t-----
\ !
~:~ ':':':;:l':':':'::~ I T
rE;:;:;;;;,:;~;~ M ON
~- !
:
m,
-
D
D
IE3
fZ2j
~
~
~
~
LOW/MEDIUM RE S. (3-6 du/ac)
MEOIUM OENSITY RES. (6-11 du/ac)
RETAIL COMMERCIAL
RESEARCH/LIMITED INDUST.
PARKS & OPEN SPACE
PUBLIC & QUASI PUBLIC
GPA-.92-1
EXHIBIT A
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS
'ROPOSAL: CHANGE FROM LOW/MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TO RESEARCH t
& LIMITED INDUSTRIAL
/-7 I I -
o .aOO'
FEET
CITY O~ CHU~A VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT-AOV. DIV. 5-1-92 C.Covarrubi3S
'1\\ J
;U JEJC"' ~)I IC
126 e~n'.
- I I ""A
, ~
I I
-
~\-
I ~
I
ULA ~ \
,r--,.;--,.,O \\---
>
<t
,Jm....i
I , II
j .' :
TREMONT
t
I I' ,
--; I : I , I I I
<f ~,2-4~' ': ,-1' ~
MONTGOMERY
o '1'1. 'i! C
Z I "
J (Jj ,.' IX:
W I I :r ~
i ~ t----"h I.....
~ It
" '
: !! I
I
'II
III
ZENITH
~
Ii
If I! I J ' .
ii M"
~ II ,
'-
,
t-.
I
I
I I;
I ~I,LP D,;- ~ ~
.. '" ~TY -
-
tCZ-92-B
:XISTING ZONING AND
.AND USE DESIGNATIONS
A-70
R- '-S-P
R- , -6-P
R-2-P
MHP
ccp
AGRICUL TURAL ZONE
SINGLE FAMIL Y PRECISE PLAN ('du/SOOO.I)
SINGLE FAMILY PRECISE PL"'N ('du/6000.I)
TWO F...MIL Y PRECISE PL"'N
MOBILE HOME P...RK
CENTRAL COMM. PRECISE PL"'N
11
1i~DIIIIllJJID~IITrilTTIiii @
STREET . "
I I i I I i I OJIIJIIIIJ ,'-~':~'6~~~':
lit ~~ 11- 5~1:'}1 rTITTTl";"lTli1 ","\-i:;
nl-"' I -I "I r.....1 u..J..J.J.lJLl."->-'
IIJ STR~l
!DIIJHIIIlllDJIIJIIIIIID
gOIIIJIIDJJ~8IJillIIIIII]
STREET
II i
-J U I
-STREET
I
,~~
> .
I! III I
II I II
ell
-
f-
AN~URZA
G~~}
I
I
cr
0___
i:': r
Z
o
~V' i Z
~ IR-,.,~:.-I'!J
~" ~
ALVDc;1\ WAY
I I I
I "
---
I
I
,
I
I
,------- I
---~
: ~--7g
I
PROPOSAL: CHANGE R-1-6-P
TO LIMITED INDUSTRIAL(I-L-P
II.
ILP
LIMITED INUSTiI''''L
LIMITED IND. PRECISE PLAN
E-XHIBIT B
t
/- 6'
I
o
FEET
I
.00'
RESOLUTION NO. GPA 92-01/PCZ-92-B
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN, AMEND THE MONTGOMERY
SPECIFIC PLAN, AND REZONE 0.3 ACRES LOCATED IN
THE SOUTHWESTERLY QUADRANT OF MAIN STREET AND
DEL MONTE AVENUE FROM "LOW MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL" AND R-1-6-P TO "RESEARCH AND
LIMITED INDUSTRIAL" AND I-L-P.
WHEREAS, duly verified applications for a General Plan Amendment,
Montgomery Specific Plan Amendment, and rezoning were filed with
the Planning Department of the City of Chula vista on April 9, 1992
by Margarita Romero; and
WHEREAS, said applications requested that approximately 0.3 acres
located on the west side of Del Monte Avenue south of Main Street
("the property") be designated "Research and Limited Industrial" on
the General Plan Land Use Diagram and the Montgomery Specific Plan
Map, and rezoned from R-1-6-P (Single Family Residential) to I-L-P
(Limited Industrial) (collectively, the "project); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a
hearing on said Project and notice of said hearing, together with
its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general
circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within
500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Property at least ten
days prior to the hearing in accordance with Government Code
sections 65358, 65090 and 65091 (a) 1 and 2 and Chula vista
Municipal Code section 19.12.070; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan Land Use Element has not been amended
more than three (3) times in this calendar year; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator recommends the
adoption of a Negative Declaration for the proposed project;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Commission finds that the
project would have no significant environmental impacts and adopts
the Negative Declaration issued on IS 92-39.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT from the facts presented to the
Planning commission, the Commission recommends that the City
Council enact the draft ordinance and resolution as attached hereto
to amend the General Plan, amend the Montgomery Specific Plan, and
rezone 0.3 acres located on the west side of Del Monte Avenue,
south of Main Street, based on the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein and in accordance with Exhibits A and
B.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be
transmitted to the owners of the property and to the City Council.
/- I
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 12th day of November, 1992 by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
Susan Fuller, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
/ - /('
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE MONTGOMERY SPECIFIC
PLAN FOR 0.3 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DEL MONTE
AVENUE NORTH OF MAIN STREET ("DEL MONTE AVENUE")
WHEREAS, duly verified applications for a General Plan Amendment
and Montgomery specific Plan Amendment were filed with the Planning
Department of the City of Chula vista on April 9, 1992 by Margarita
Romero; and
WHEREAS, said applications requested that approximately 0.3 acres
located on the west side of Del Monte Avenue south of Main Street
(the "Property") be designated "Research and Limited Industrial" on
the General Plan Land Use Diagram and Montgomery Specific Plan Map
(with associated rezone, collectively, the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning commission held a public hearing on November
12, 1992, and voted ___ to ___ to recommend that the city Council
approve the Project; and
WHEREAS, the city Council set the time and place for a hearing on
said Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose,
was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation
in the city and its mailing to property owners within 1000 feet of
the exterior boundaries of the Property at least ten days prior to
the hearing in accordance with Government Code sections 65358,
65090 and 65091 (a) 1 and 2 and Chula vista Municipal Code section
19.12.070; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study (Case No. 92-42) was prepared for the
proposed project; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator
adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration
Monitoring Program for the proposed project; and
recommends the
and Mitigation
WHEREAS, the General Plan Amendment has not been amended more than
three (3) times this calendar year and the City Council intends the
General Plan Amendment approved by this action to be heard,
considered, consolidated and treated as one General Plan Amendment
along with the Abode Plaza General Plan Amendment and the Rancho
Del Rey Business Park General Plan Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised,
namely 6:00 P.M., , 1992 in the Council Chambers, 276
Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was
thereafter closed.
/~/(
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT from the facts presented to the
City Council, the Council finds that the project would have no
significant environmental impacts and adopts the Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program issued on IS 92-39.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT from the facts presented to the City
Council, the Council amends the General Plan and amends the
Montgomery Specific Plan to redesignate 0.3 acres located on the
west side of Del Monte Avenue, south of Main Street from "Low
Medium Residential (3-6 dujac) to "Research and Limited
Industrial".
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
/~ J 'J.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE
ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 19.18.010 OF
THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REZONING 0.3 ACRES LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF DEL MONTE AVENUE, SOUTH OF MAIN
STREET, FROM R-1-6-P to I-L-P
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a rezoning was filed with
the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on April 9, 1992
by Margarita Romero; and
WHEREAS, said application requested that 0.3 acres located on the
west side of Del Monte Avenue, south of Main Street, be rezoned
from R-1-6-P (Single Family Residential with Precise Plan) to I-L-P
(Limited Industrial with Precise Plan); and
WHEREAS, the Planning commission held a public hearing on November
12, 1992 and voted to to recommend that the city Council
enact an ordinance to rezone said property to I-L-P; and
WHEREAS, the City Council set the time and place for a hearing on
said rezoning application and notice of said hearing, together with
its purpose, was given by its pUblication in a newspaper of general
circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within
500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten
days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place advertised,
namely 6:00 P.M., , 1992, in the Council Chambers, 276
Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was
thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has concluded that
there would be no significant environmental impacts and recommends
adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on IS 92-39.
NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does
hereby find, determine and ordain as follows:
SECTION I: Environmental
The city Council finds that the project would have no significant
environmental impacts and adopts the Negative Declaration issued on
IS 92-39.
SECTION II: Findings
The City Council finds that the rezoning is consistent with the
city of Chula vista General Plan as amended concurrently with this
action and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare,
and good zoning practice support the rezoning to I-L-P.
/ ~/:3
The City Council finds that, pursuant to section 19.56.041 of the
Zoning Ordinance, following circumstance is evident which allows
application of the "P" Precise Plan modifying district to this
site:
The property or area to which the P modifying district is applied
is an area adjacent and contiguous to a zone allowing different
land uses, and the development of a precise plan will allow the
area so designated to coexist between land usages which might
otherwise prove incompatible.
SECTION III: Rezoning
section 19.18.010 of the Chula vista Municipal Code (being the
zoning map) is hereby amended to rezone the Property to I-L-P
(Limited Industrial with Precise Plan Modifier) as shown on
Exhibit B attached hereto. The District Regulations for the P
modifier district are attached hereto as Attachment A.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
city Attorney
/-11
MAIL TO:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA92010
Attn: Doug Reid
JUN 0 4 1992
IMPACT) BY ~1~V
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Chula Vista is considering a
recommendation that the project herein identified will have no significant
environmental impact in compliance with Section 15070 of State CEQA
guidelines. A copy of the Negative Declaration (finding of no significant
impact) and the Initial Study, which supports the proposed findings,. are on
file in the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista,
CA 92010. These documents Ire available for public review between the .hours
of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
{ ~OTICE
OF PROPO~ED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL
f2D [,. ~ iT\'
Lr' Annefle J Evans. Clerk J1
,..
Anyone wishing to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration should provide
their written conrnents to the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth
Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
This proposed finding does not constitute approval or denial of the project
itself; it ~y determines if the project could have significant environmental
impact. PrOJects which could have significant impact must have an
Environmental Impact Report prepared to evaluate those possible impacts in
compliance with Section 15064 of State CEQA Guidelines.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this Negative Declaration in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised in written correspondence.
,
For further information concerning this project, incl uding public hearing
dates, please contact Marvann Miller at (619) 691-5101.
This noti ce is requi red to be fil ed wi th the County Clerk I s offi ce for a
period of not less than thirty .(30) days.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUt1BER: 629-060-08
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
126 Del Monte Avenue
General Plan Amendment and Rezone to allow for a
contractor's storage
DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY:
IIHTIAL STUDY 110. 15-92-39
DATE: June 2. 1992
Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency
Y',^~
1-15
Ell 7 (Rev, 1/90)
WPC 0006Y
J'ILBD I. TD OJ'PICB 07 TIlE COUNTY CLERK,
e.n DIBGO COUJrTT O. ...J8IN 0 4 1992 .
P03"Jru JUN 0 4 1992 R)::btOV;ED JUL 0 6 1992
ft~RN.DTOAGBKCYON ry/?/~
DEPUTY 9~~:A~ /
.
negative declaration
PROJECT NAME: Del Monte Avenue Rezone and General Plan Amendment
PROJECT LOCAT!ON: The site is located at 126 Del Monte Avenue, 200 feet
south of its intersection with Main Street
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 629-060-08
PROJECT APPLICANT: Margarita Romero
CASE NO: 1$-92-39
DATE: June 1, 1992
A. Proiect SettinQ
The project area is an undeveloped parcel covering 1/3 acre (14,500
square feet). The site is level and is sparsely vegetated with weeds,
grasses, .and two palm trees. There are no sensitive plant. or animal
resources on the site. The only existing structure is a wooden storage
shack located on the parcel's southeast corner. The project area is used
for storage purposes, consistent with adjacent parcels to the north and
west. South of the site is an auto salvage business, and to the east is
a single-family residential subdivision. The site was previously used
for a roofing contractor's yard.
B. Proiect Description
The proposed project is a request for an amendment to the General Plan
designation from the existing Low-Medium Residential to Research and
Limited Manufacturing, an amendment to the Land Use Element of the
Montgomery Specific Plan from Single Family Residential to Industrial,
and a rezoning from Single-Family Residential to limited Industrial with
a Precise Plan modifier.
The amendments and the rezoning are to allow for the possible future.
development of an industrial project consisting of such uses as a storage
building and office. Such a land use could have potentially significant
impacts such as traffic, noise, glare, etc. In addition, due to the
possibility of toxins present in the soil from the site's previous use as
a contractor's roofing yard, a Phase I Hazardous Waste Assessment must be
conducted prior to any future development of the site. Further
environmental review will be required before construction takes place.
Development of the parcel will also be subject to precise pla~ review.
C. Compatibility with ZoninQ and Plans
Thi s project i nvol yes an amendment to the General Plan and the Land Use
Element of the Montgomery Specific Plan to allow for the future
deve 1 opment of an i ndustri a 1 warehouse. The project woul d also requi re
rezoning of the site from Single-Family Residential to Limited Industrial
with a Precise Plan modifier. These changes in land use designation and
zoning would not be inconsistent with the surrounding industrial uses.
Prec i se Pl an reyi ew will ensure project is compat i b 1 e with the
single-family use to the east of the site. ~{f.;
~~
/-/ (p -.....L-='
,~=::~
city 01 chule viste plennlng depertment 0tV OF
environmentel review Hctlon OiUlA VISTA
-2-
D. Comoliance with the Threshold/Standards Policv
1. Fi re/EMS
The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that fire and medical units
must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of
the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases.
The project is in compl iance with this Threshold Pol icy. However,
the Fire Department has indicated that the 4 inch water main on Del
Monte Avenue will not provide the required fire flow for the future
proposed industrial buildings. To avoid the cost of upgrading the
water main, the applicant must incorporate a fully automated
sprinkler system at such time when building plans are submitted.
Implementation of this mitigation measure will also avoid the need
to pave the yard area and provide a turnaround on the property for
fire apparatus.
2. Police
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must
respond to Priority 1 call s within 7 miniatures or less and
maintain an average response time to all Priority call of 4.5
minutes or less. Pol ice units must respond to Priority 2 calls
within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to
all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The Police Department is
currently maintaining an acceptable level of service based on the
thresho 1 d standard, and the proposed project wi 11 not increase the
need for police protection. Therefore, the project is considered to
be compatible with this Threshold Policy.
3. Traffic
The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that all intersections must
operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "CO or better, with the
except i on that Level of Seryi ce (LOS) "D" may occur duri ng the peak
two hours of the day at signalized intersections. The intersection
of Main Street and Del Monte Avenue is currently operating at LOS
"B". The project will generate an estimated 12 Average Daily Trips
(ADT). The project will not affect the LOS, and is considered to be
compatible with this Threshold Policy.
4. Parks/Recreation
The Threshold/Standards Policy for
acres/I,OOO population. The proposed
net populat ion increase, and will
Threshold/Standards Policy.
Parks and Recreation is 3
project will not result in a
therefore comply with the
5. Orainage
The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that storm water flows and
volumes shall not exceed City Engineer Standards. Storm runoff from
(- /7
-3-
the project site will flow southerly along Oel Monte Avenue to an
unimproved drainage channel. The drainage facil ities are adequate
to serve the project, and are therefore in compl iance with the
policy.
6. Sewer
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that sewage flows and
volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. Existing sewer
lines are adequate to serve the project. The project is considered
to be compatible with this Policy. The State Water Resources
Control Board has spec i fi c regul at ions regardi ng the di scharge of
pollutants from commercial and industrial facilities. The applicant
must file a Notice of Intent to comply with the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (N.P.D.E.S.) General Permit regulations.
7. Water
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that adequate storage,
treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently
with planned growth and that water quality standards are not
jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project
will have no effect on water availability or quality, and is
considered to be compatible with this Threshold Policy.
E. Identification of Environmental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista determined that the
proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect, and
the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
A Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070
of the State CEQA Guidelines.
The following impacts have been determined to be less than significant.
A discussion of each of these less than significant impacts from the
proposed project follows.
1. Water
Due to recent drought conditions, as a condition of project
approval, the applicant must agree to no net increase in water
consumpt i on or part i ci pate in whatever water conservation or fee
off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of
building permit issuance.
2. Traffic Circulation
The proposed plan amendments and rezoning actions will not in and of
themselves affect the Level of Service or Average Daily Traffic. At
such time when a specific development project is proposed, the
project would be associated with a temporary increase in
construction vehicle traffic during the construction phase of the
project. However, these impacts wi 11 be short-term and temporary.
liS'
-4-
After project comp 1 et i on, Average Da ily Traffi c wi 11 increase from
22,900 to 22,912, and the level of service on Main Street will
remainatIB".
In accordance with the revi s ions set forth by the City Engi neeri ng
Department, at the time construction is proposed, the applicant must
implement specific site improvements to compensate for the
incremental effect of development on public thoroughfare. These
revisions include:
a. Construction of a curb, gutter, sidewalk and a driveway
approach (using asphaltic concrete pavement).
b. Installation of one street light.
c. Relocation of one utility pole.
d. Dedication for any future street widenings deemed necessary by
the City Engineering Department.
These measures will insure traffic impacts are mitigated to a
level of less than significant.
3. GeoloQy/Soils
The City Engineering Department requires that a complete
geotechnical report be issued. With compliance to specific site
preparation standards identified in the report, and standard
development codes requ i ri ng correct i on of adverse soil s condi t ions
prior to the construction of buildings, no significant adverse
geological impacts will result.
4. Noise
The proposed GPA and rezoning would not in itself have an impact on
ambient noise levels. However, the proposed project would be
associated with potential noise impacts during the construction
phase of the project. Noise impacts would result from the use of
construction equipment which can range up to 70db(A) and above for
earth movi ng equi pment. However, these impacts wi 11 be short-term
and will terminate upon completion of the project.
In the future, operation of the warehouse and any associated sales
must conform to the provisions of the City's Noise Control Ordinance
which establishes maximum allowable noise levels and hours of
operation. With conformance to these regulations, noise impacts
will be less than significant.
5. liQht and Glare
When constructed, the proposed i ndustri a 1 warehouse coul d i nvol ve
the installation of low power sodium vapor lights which will operate
from dusk to dawn. These lights should be of a type which could be
(- / 1
-5-
shielded from surrounding areas. Project lighting must be focused
downward towards the site. With comp 1 i ance to these condi t ions,
light and glare impacts are deemed to be less than significant.
6. Risk of Uoset
The proposed project would not involve the use of explosives, other
than fuel used for construct ion equi pment at the time development
takes pl ace. The grading contractor must abide by all appl icable
health and safety requirements for safe use of such equipment. The
previous use of this site as a roofing contractor's yard may
indicate the presence of hazardous or toxic material in the soil.
The risk of upset will be mitigated to a level of less than
significant through compliance to all conditions set forth in a
Phase I Environmental Assessment. See Human Health #7, below.
7. Human Health
Due to the possible presence of toxic or hazardous materials on the
site, before actual construction takes place in the future, the
appl icant must submit a soils report and a Phase I Environmental
Assessment to determine the existence or degree of soil
contami nat i on. Wi th comp 1 i ance to speci fi c site preparat i on
standards identified in the report, human health impacts will be
mitigated to a level of less than significant.
F. MitiQation necessary to avoid siQnificant effects
The proposed project is not associated with any significant or
potentially significant environmental impacts. Implementation of the
aforementioned conditions will be sufficient to satisfy both the
Thresholds/Standards Pol icy and the approved standards for the City of
Chula Vista. No specific mitigation measures will be required for the
project.
G. FindinQs of InsiQnificant Imoact
Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project
described above will not have a significant environmental impact ~nd no
environmental impact report needs to be prepared.
1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of ~ fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate ~ plant or ~nimal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of ~ r~re or
endangered pl ant or animal, or el iminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory.
The project will not have a significant adverse effect on the
quality of the natural environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, or eliminate a plant or animal convnunity. The
Initial Study indicates that there are no endangered species,
cultural resources, or sensitive biological resources on the project
site.
/- ~ 0
-6-
2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental
goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals.
The proposed General Pl an Amendments and rezoni ng woul d not result
in any environmental effects which would adversely impact short- or
long-term envi ronmenta 1 goal s. Future development on the s He will
be subject to further review to ensure compl iance with long-term
goals.
3. The project has possible effects which are individually limited but
cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, "cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other current projects,. and the
effects of probable future projects.
The development of the proposed site could have an incremental
effect on the surrounding area. However, this effect will be
mitigated by the specified road improvement measures and by the
dedi cat i on for future road expans i on, if necessary. Therefore, the
proposed project will not have any effects which are cumulatively
considerable.
4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
The proposed project will not result in substantial adverse effects
on human beings directly or indirectly. The potential impacts from
hazardous or toxic waste will be mitigated to a level of
non-significance through compliance to the recommendations set forth
in the Phase I Environmental Assessment report which must be
prepared as a condition of project approval at the time when
construction is proposed. No other public health impacts were
identified in the Initial Study.
H. Consultation
1. Individuals and OrQanizations
City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering
Current Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building and Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Martin Schmidt, Parks and Recreation Department
Richard A. Reynolds, Sweetwater Authority
Diana Lilly, Planning
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent: Jerry Stafford
4155 C Street.
San Diego, CA 92102
/. ~ f
-7-
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
3. Initial Study
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial
Study, any comments received on the Initial Study and any convnents
received during the public review period for the Negative
Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review
of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning
Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
)I?} ':; f'~!I~:! (i ) I( ;JL I.,
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR
WPC 0303p
/-;;?-;:;>
DISCUSSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
The following discussion is associated with the Initial Study Checklist form.
1. llr:1h
The future warehouse construct i on woul d i nvol ve the gradi ng of 14,500
square feet, and the placing of 50 cubic yards of gravel fill. The
City Engineering Department requires that a geotechnical study be
performed on the site. Wi th comp 1 i ance to standard si te preparat ion
regulations, earth and soil impacts will be less than significant.
2. Air
Significant air qual ity impacts would not result from future warehouse
operations due to the small size and localized nature of the project.
Emissions would consist mainly of dust due to grading activities, which
would have to be suppressed by implementing standard dust control
methods, including watering the soil and street sweeping.
3. Water
The proposed project would not result in a significant change in water
quality or availability. The City Engineering Department has indicated
that existing surface runoff will adequately be contained through
compl iance with standard engineering standards, such as the criteria
set forth in the Subdivision Manual and the Grading Ordinance. In
addition, the applicant must comply with whatever City water
conservation or fee off-set program the City has in place at time of
building permit issuance to ensure water availability impacts are less
than significant. The site was previously developed and is in an area
where services and facilities currently are available. Water
aya il abil ity wi 11 be veri fi ed through the Cali forni a Ameri can Water
Company prior to building permit issuance.
4,5. Plant and Animal Life
The site is currently disturbed and sparsely vegetated with native
weeds and grasses. No endangered plant or animal resources are present
on the site. Of the two palm trees on the site, the appl icant has
i ndi cated that when the warehouse is constructed, one palm tree wi 11
remain, and the other will be relocated. Thus, biological impacts will
be less than significant.
6. Noise
When a specific development project is approved, grading operations
will involve temporary noise impacts, however standard limits on
grading and construction activities will be imposed (grading allowed
weekdays 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 7:00 a.m. to
8:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday). Noise resulting from day-to-day
operations must conform to City noise ordinance standards regarding
hours of operation and decibel levels to ensure impacts to nearby
residents are less than significant.
/_ ,:;;;3
7. Liqht and Glare
Future construction of a warehouse could involve the installation of
Low Power Sodi urn vapor 1 ight i ng wh i ch wi 11 operate from dusk to dawn
for security purposes. Lighting must be a type which could be shielded
from surrounding areas to ensure impacts to nearby residents are less
than significant. lighting must be directed downward at an angle of
less than 45 degrees.
8. Land Use
The proposed project would change the current zoning on the site from
Single-Family Residential to Industrial and change the General Plan
designation from Low-Medium Residential to Research and Limited
Manufacturi ng. Thi s des i gnat ion is cons i stent with past uses of the
site, and is compatible with surrounding industrial uses. With
compl iance to all requirements set forth by the City Fire and Traffic
Departments regarding improvements and the provision of infrastructure,
land use impacts will be less than significant.
9. Natural Resources
There may be an incremental increase in the use of fossil fuels with
the future operation of the proposed industrial use, however, this
increase will be minor and is not considered a significant impact.
10. Risk of Upset
The proposed project will not involve the use of explosives, other than
fuel used for construction equipment when building takes place. The
grading contractor must abide by all applicable health and safety
requirements for safe use of such equipment. The previous use of this
site as a roofing contractor's yard may indicate the presence of
hazardous or toxic material. A Phase I Environmental Assessment Report
is required to assess the nature of these substances. Compliance with
all requirements of this report will ensure the risk of upset is less
than significant. See #17, Human Health.
11,12. Population/Housinq
Although the area is currently zoned single-family residential, past
uses of the site have been industrial in nature. No residents
currently live on the site, and housing stock will not be effected.
13. Transportation/Circulation
The proposed GPA and rezone would not itself affect transportation or
circulation facilities. When a specific project is approved,
construction vehicles could have a temporary, short term impact on
traffic during the construction phase of the project. However, these
impacts will terminate upon completion of construction. Average Daily
Traffic will increase from 22,900 to 22,912, and Level of Service on
Main Street will remain at "B" after project completion. The
Engineering Department requires that street improvements be constructed
to ensure transportation impacts are less than significant.
-2-
/- ;;; ~
14. Public Services
Routing forms from City staff indicate that no public services would be
significantly impacted by this project.
15. EnerQY
An increased demand on el ectri ci ty woul d result from future industri a 1
operations, however, the increase would be slight and incremental, and
is not deemed to be significant.
16. Thresholds
The proposed project is
Standards. Fire and street
City Thresholds are met.
in conformance with all City Threshold
improvements will be required to ensure all
17. Human Health
Before actual construction takes place in the future, as a condition of
project approval, the applicant must submit a soils report and a Phase
1 Environmental Assessment to determine the existence or degree of soil
contami nat i on due to preYi ous on- s ite hazardous waste storage.
Compliance with all recommendations set forth in this report will
mitigate human health impacts to a level of less than significant.
18. Aesthetics
The rezone and general plan amendment will not have an aesthetic
impact. New building construction will be required to conform with
design review guidelines to ensure aesthetic impacts to surrounding
residents are not significant.
19. Recreations
The project site is an undeveloped lot currently used for storage
purposes. The proposed rezone, GPA, and industrial operations will not
effect any current recreational opportunities.
20. Cultural Resources
The site has been previously disturbed and is not expected to contain
significant cultural or historic artifacts.
WPC 0348p
-3-
/- .;:;.-5
ADDENDUM TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT NAME: Del Monte Avenue Rezone and General Plan Amendment
CASE #: IS 92-39
This addendum to the Negative Declaration reviews the proposed
project's impacts to Elementary and secondary Schools.
The proposed project would redesignate and rezone a 0.3 acre lot
from Single-Family Residential Uses to Limited Industrial Uses.
The project would not generate any additional students, and thus
would have no impacts upon elementary and secondary schools in the
area.
/- C;; <F
Y~-Q7
APPLICATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE PLAN
IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER
FOR OFFICE USE
A. BACKGROUND
INITIAL STUDY
City of Chula Vista
Application Form
Case No.
Depos It
Receipt No.
Oate Rec'd
Accepted by
Project No.
1. PROJECT TITLE
2. PROJECT LOCATION (Street address or description)
126 Del Monte Ave. Chula Vista Ca. 92011
Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. MB 43-53, APN 629-060-08
3. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION ,,) C:pnpr"l Plan Ampndment b) Zone Change
c) See remainder of 1.5. and Site Plan for more information.
4. Harne of Applicant Margarita Romero
Address l44 Ti na Dr.
City Chula Vista State Ca.
5. Name of Preparer/Agent Jerry Stafford
Address 4155 C St.
City c;"n Oipgn State r."
Relation to Applicant None
Phone 585-3523
Zip 92011
Phone 5~ta~~ ~ ~~~~ \
Zip Q7107
6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents
required by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
a. Permits or approvals required:
..lL. General Plan Amendment /t.- Design Review Appl ication ___ Publ ic Project
..lL. Rezone/Prezone ___ Tentative Subd. Map ___ Annexation
___ Precise Plan ___ Grading Permit ___ Redevelopment Agency
___ Specific Plan ___ Tentative Parcel Map ___ O.P.A.
Condo Use Permit ___ Site Plan & Arch.Review ___ Redevelopment Agency
___ Variance ___ Project Area Committee D,D.A.
___ Coastal Development Use Permit ___ Other
Permit
b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review
Coordinator).
___ Grading Plan Arch. Elevations
___ Parcel Hap === Landscape Plans
___ Precise Plan ___ Tentative Subd. Hap
___ Specific Plan ___ Improvement Plans
___ Other Agency Permit ___ Soils Report
or Approvals Required ___ Hazardous Waste
Assessment
___ Hydrological Study
___ Biological Study
___ Archaeological Survey
Noise Assessment
=== Traffic Impact Report
..L. Other (Site Plan)
WPC 9459P
j-;:( 7
-6-
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
1. land Arei: sq. footage 14,500 or acreige 1/3
If land area to be dedicated, state acreage and purpose.
2. Complete this section if project is residential.
a. Type development: Single family Two family
Multi family Townhouse Condominium
b. Total number of structures
c. Maximum height of structures
d. Number of Units: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms
3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms Total units
e. Gross density (DU/total acres)
f. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication)
g. Estimated project population
h. Estimated sale or rental price range
i. Square footage of structure
j. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures
k. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
1. Percent of site in road and paved surface
-
3. Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial or ~
jIll.
a. Type(s) of land use Industrial
b. Floor area 400 SF + 1200SF Height of structure(s) I storey (8')
c. Type of construction used in the structure
Concrete Block
d. Describe major access points to the structures and the
orientation to adjoining properties and streets
See Site Plan
e.
Number of on-site parking spaces provided two
Estimated number of employees per shift
shifts 1 Total 2
Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate ~
There will be no visiting customers on a routine basis. contact by ph.
f.
two
, Number of
g.
h. Estimated number of deliveries per day 4
/.;;; g'
WPC 9459P
-7-
i. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate
r.()11nty lJinp
j. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings
Storage of construction materials and firewood in season.
k. Hours of ope rat ion 7: 00 AM to 4: 00 PM
1. Type of exterior lighting Dusk to Dawn LP Sodium VaDor
4. If project is other than residential, commercial or industrial
complete this section.
a. Type of project
b. Type of facilities provided
c. Square feet of enclosed structures
d. Height of structure(s) - maximum
e. Ultimate occupancy load of project
f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces
h. Additional project characteristics
C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
1. If the project could result in the direct emission of any air
pollutants, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) identify them.
Emissions would occur from an average of two trips a day by
DY two company trucKS ana the occaSIonal VIsItor. The entIre
c:itA 1.1;11 hA ,...la~narl ::Inr1 8r~rlAri uith 'p.c::JI' 8r~17.cl FQr
dust control.
2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated ~
(If yes, complete the following:)
a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how lIany cubic yards of
earth will be excavated? None
b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed? 50 CY of \!ravel
c.
How much area (sQ. ft. or acres) wi 11 be graded? 14.500 SF
What will be the - Maximum depth of cut 2" for leveling
Average depth of cut 1-1/2" "
Maximum depth of fill 1-1/2" "
Average depth of fill 1-1/2" "
d.
/-;;?'l
WPC 9459P
-8-
"._-----.---
.~--~_.. -
--
3. Will there be any noise generated from the proposed project site or
from points of access which may impact the surrounding or adjacent
land uses? No
4. Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed
project and the type of energy used (air conditioning, electrical
appllanc,e, heating equipment, etc.) Electrical-220v lor room air
condItIoner, aIr compressor and welder.
Gas-ReSIdentIal type serVIce tor wall turnace, not water.
S. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project
(sq. ft. or acres) None
6. If the project will result in any employment opportunities describe
the nature and type of these jobs. None
7.
Will highly
substances
site? No
fhlll1table
be used
or potentially
or stored
explosive
within
materials or
the project
8. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by
the project? 5
9. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the
project, and their points of access or connection to the project
site. Improvements include but not limited to the following: new
streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer
lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
None
D. DESCRIPTION Of ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
1. GeoloQY
Has a geology study been conducted on the property? No
(If yes, please attach)
Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? No
(If yes, please attach)
2. HvdroloQV
Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the
site? No (If yes, please explain in detail.)
a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water
table? No
b. Are there any watercourses or dra i ~age improvements on or
adjacent to the site? No
/. "BC>
WPC 9459P
-9-
c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly into or toward
a domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay?
No
d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to
adjacent areas? No
e. Describe all drainaae facilities to be. provided and their
location. None
3. Noise
a. Are there any noise sorces in the project vicinity which may
impact the project site? No
'4. Bioloav
a. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state?
No
b. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the property?
Yes
No
(Please attach a copy).
c. Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate
location, height, diameter, and species of trees~ and which (if
any) will be removed by the project. Two 1-1/,' dia. palm
trees to be left in place. See SIte Plan tor locatIon.
5. Past Use of the land
a.
Are there any known historical or
located on or near the project site?
archeological
No
resources
b.
Are there any known paleontological resources?
No
c.
Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on
or near the project site? No
d.
What was the land previously used for?
Contractors vard-(RoofinR Contractor)
/- :5>(
WPC 9459P
-10-
6. Current land Use
I. Describe III structures Ind land uses currently existing on the
project site. There is a 'lean-to'. a stora2e shed ;nd I
~mall house t~ailer ~n th~ site ~lon2 wit~ ~:n~~d~~:~.e
surDlus materIals. The sIte IS not current 1_ __ ____
b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on
adjacent property.
North Used auto sales offi~e & lot. residential dwelling
and a stora e area for non 0 eratin vehicles.
South Shop structure or auto repair
East Residential area.
West Tire salvage and repair area with large 0 en shed.
7. Social
a. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?) None
b, Are there any current employment opportunities on site? (If so,
how many and what type?) None
B. Please provide any other information which may assist In the
evaluation of the proposed project.
The proposed use will be compatible with ~urrent land use.
The low volume operations of the building contractor will be
effectively concealed by a 6' high block wall to be constr-
ucted along the entire perimeter of the property.
~3~
WPC 94S9P
-]]-
E. CERTIFICATION
--,IIj-~-~
4tll~~; --~
i!or.guY(};- 1/ ,.,d",. lldAM"
Owner/owner in escrow.
or
HEREBY AFFIRM, that'to the best of my belief, the statements and information
herein contained are in all respect~ true and correct and that all known
information concerning the project and its setting has been included in this
application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any
enclosures for attachments thereto.
DATE: 3-23-92
*If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name.
j- .3 "3
WPC 94S9P
-12-
Case No. 9;2.-39
CITY DATA
F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
.
1. Current Zonina on site:
North
South
East
West
-c
- \- -
'-
Does the project conform to the current zoning? YY7:>y~i I?'lu.::,h 0.....
rt..()v,-~!. lr\ 7-O~'Uv'1.0
2. General Plan land use
designation on site: m~ ~ MecL;iJfV1 ~t:r~ . :;~
North " /1rrL-f: L..... ~.:.. fu~\
South Kt"'~lclf',d_--hI'J ~I..) HrdlutvI
East ~1,rl"A+;:f~W K~~II{VI
West .,:-+n c.rYd '< /-..,,,.J..t.l !--1r'"''r''' ,--Iu,~
Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram? \)~~~
'rLL-";l)l'~j~-Z:) C>-- L~'A\.t1M ~~~_ .4."....+ y.~~N'\.."'\
"
Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent
to an area so des ignated? tJ",
Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? jJ~
(If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance
the scenic quality of the route.)
3. Schools
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following:
Students
Generated
From Proiect
School
Permanent Temporary Current
Cacacitv Caoac1tv Enrollment
Elementary
Jr. High
Sr. High
~/A
4. Remarks:
}'7~J} I 1/ .. j 0 '7 :-.-~/~ (~:_ lL<
Director'o Planning or Representative
2- ! ~ ., L
v )
Date
WPC 9459P
-13-
j- 3 'f
- 13 -
Case No. 15-'1;;2- 3'1
H. FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. What is the distance to the nearest fire station and what is the Fire
Department's estimated reaction time? One and three-quarters of a mile.
Approximately four minutes.
2. Will the Fire Department be able to provide an adequate level of fire
protection for the proposed facility without an increase in equipment
or personnel? Yp<
3. Remarks
c~,,~
~ HW<f~11
Flre ars a
4/22/92
Date
/-:3 5
-13(a)-
Case No. IS-Cj~- 3Ct
H-l. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1.
Are existing neighborhood and community parks near the project
adequate to serve the population increase resulting from this
project?
Neighborhood
Community parks
~
~
2. If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed
as part of the project adequate to serve the population increase?
Neighborhood ~
Community parks a.P
3. Does this project exceed the Parks and Recreation Thresholds
established by City Council policies?
t)o
~f.~~~.
Parks and Recreation Director or
Representative
'f. 'Zl ~."....
Date
.
/- 3[,.
G. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Case No. IS -q.;z -~
1. Drainaae
a.
Is the project site within a flood plain? ~().
If so, state which FEMA Floodway Frequency Boundary
UtA.
.
b.
What is the location and description of existing on-site
drainage facilities? ~U1ZFIV; R.olt/"TC> "'DFL M~ AVFJJuE.
c.
Are they adequate to serve th~prOject? )I~.
If not, explain briefly._ IJ .
.
d.
What is the location and description of existing off-site
drainage facilities? ~~US:: fLnkI A(A)lJE- "1:>F-l- UD#..l-r-&:
A~IJLJ~ ~~IZJ,..Y' 7rJ UA.1,MPR/:>W;D CHAAlUJ:l-.
.
e.
Are they adequate to serve the project? YEE~.
If not, explain briefly. 1J./A.
.
2. Transoortation
a. What roads provide primary access to the project? MA"J 9rPc:-..--
b. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be
generated by the project (per day)? 1~A.Dnr
c. What is the ADT and estimated level of service before and after
project completion?
Before After
A.D. T. ;l..:l qoo ~~.., 1:L
, .
liS"
'.S',
L.O.S.
If the A.D.T. or L.O.S. is unknown or not applicable, explain
briefly. '')IA-.
d. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project? If
not, explain briefly. y~~.
WPC 9459P
-14-
/~ .3 ?
YS-~7
g.
Case No. ;rS...q,;z - ~
e. Are there any intersections at or near the point that will
result in an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS)? No.
If so, identify: Location #oJ fA .
Cumulative L.a.S. .
Is there any dedication required? YE-S.
If so, please specify. 1)~/_ MD~n:; "'\I~,jVI!i I~ AN 'Iotn~""L
1ZoJJ)W~. t::;."~I~/':J.11 ~rCA.""/Aa.J I!tt. 'l?e:?J/IJz:r.... 7b j,f~r:r mE
""'r..F-WI~TH ~{f/lI~JE"'T"$ t>F ~(b '1:El:>1CA77o/o.J.
Is there any street widening required? V~C.
If so, please specify. A,~' "W~.TJ:r~ Po/ll.O/oJ.,..""t:I: os.! :DEl..
Mt>>J n:::: A-v~Ai ~
f.
h.
Are there any other street improvements required? Y1=S.
If so, please specify the general nature of the necessary
~+-,";;.~tLg~A~::;:::'~:~D~rz;:~~~J
~€~A~ DIJ E. LlT"Il-I'T"'Y 'J;bL..s:" .
3. Soils
a. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the
project site? 1I/oJ/4.Jow..J
b. If yes, specify these conditions. ~A
c. Is a soil s report necesspry? Y.e:..,;
4. Land Form
a. What is the average natural slope of the site? .:l %
b. What is the maximum natural slope of the site? ~~
5. Noise
Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that
are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required
of the applicant? A}o.
6.~
How much solid and liquid (sewage) waste will be generated by the
proposed project per day?
V"'ICfoID~. Ifl5cJFFICo'j(..rr
Sol id j;~..or'J{'tolF'oJlM&.T1t~.L. Liouid L/:l.-I (.;All ~/""'Y' (,. (, ~v 5)
What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or
downstream from the site? 13" V~P IN '1:>El... MCIllrE. AVF/oJu!iE. AN.t::>
1$1," VCP 'J)oW",-"'Z:AIA ., AT" A/..voG4. <!rf;?~
Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? y~.
/-.38
IIPC 9459P
-15-
YS-S-;J.7
Case No. :J;s-q2-39
7. Remarks
Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impacts,
mitigation measures, or other issues. TEfoIAIo/T (A 'RUft.-bI1Jt!. ~;cr()/Z.)
'i!/:":~~f~:;::~~ ~Io.l'::;~~::-:'~:/"~~
WITU N."P.'D.lF_~_ ~&:...IC"",AL 1A1'b1Xr~A1 pt::"~/r I2FAUt..4-TlnAlt;..
City Engi er or Representative
?ft-I'lJ-
Date
.
j- 37
WPC 9459P
-16-
.
'PROJECT LOCATION:
126 Del Monte Ave.
Chula Vista Ca 9Z10Z
2'
I": 20'
I LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
IMaP Book 43-53
APN 6Z9-060-08
Lot 90 Whittington
Subdivision No. 10
OWNER:
Margarita Romero
144 Tina Dr.
Chula Vista Ca 9Z10Z
I
I PREPARED BY:
;Jerry C. Stafford
4155 C St.
San Diego Ca. 9Z10Z
No. Parking
Spaces required: 3
No. parking
Spaces Provided: 3
Exist.
Exist.
Zone:R-I-6-P
G.P: Low/Medium ,
Density Res
100'
W. PL
CONSTRUCT ZO'x40'
Cone. Block Sto- ~
rage Bldg. (800 s. f. ) '.
I-Storey REMOVE '" ~
Surplus .
~ Lumber " " ~
~,,~J
l' Palm ( '~" ),\
to remain ~
RELOCATE l'Palm
PL
REMOVE Exist Ch. Link Fence
Construct 6' cone.
Block Wall Around
Entire Perimeter
REMOVE
Surplus
Tile
,.....
~
V1
Constr. 3 Parking
Spaces-(10'xZO')
1
I
I )\
ill)
Ii ~
J\J
CONSTRUCT ZO'xZO'
Off. Bldg.(400 s.f.)
I-Storey
REMOVE:
Surplus
Tile
REMOVE:
Lean-to
Storage Shack
Trailer
REPLACE Exist.
W/20' Or nt
Gate '
ZO' Gate
IrO?
-
REMOVE 6' Chain Link Fence
CONSTR. 6'. block wall
E. PL
EXIT/ENTRANCE
Power Pole I
lZ KV
. '\ I'" '\\ '~J ",- '\\
xist. Pavement
." \\\
\\\ ."
8"S
l., ELM 0 N T E
A V E.
4"W
l-l/Z"J{P G
Is I T E P L A Nl (Proposed Project)
Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk
/-4"6
-
-----.
---..---.-------
~~~
:~~~
~~~~
~- ~-
}i<fl~ -:; 2c" '72-
CllY OF
CHULA VISTA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
July 17, 1992
Margarita Romero
144 Tina Drive
Chu1a vista, CA 92011
RE: Initial study 92-39
.
Dear Mrs. Romero:
As a follow up to the meeting held July 13, 1992 regarding the
Initial Study for your proposed general plan amendment/rezone at
126 Del Monte Avenue, Chula Vista, the following is a synopsis of
how the City will proceed with the processing of your project.
As indicated, the Initial Study conducted on your property
identified the potential for soil contamination from the past use
of the site as a roof ing company. As a result, the City is
concerned that soil on the site may be contaminated with roofing
coatings or other toxins.
As a result, the potential for hazardous waste impacts
requires that a Phase I Hazardous Waste Assessment be conducted
prior to any future development of this site. The Phase I
Assessment is required to conduct a thorough historic survey of
past uses on site to identify specific chemical by-products of
those uses.
If the Phase I Assessment identifies the potential for
contamination, a Phase II Hazardous Waste Assessment could be
required to test for particular chemicals identified during Phase
I and to recommend a remediation plan to show how these chemicals
would be remediated prior to future development.
It is the City's understanding that you are only interested in
applying for the general plan amendment and rezone at this time,
therefore, the completion of a Phase I Assessment will not be
required as a condition of your general plan amendment application,
but will be required before actual construction takes place in the
future.
tf
j- -,/1
276 FOURTH A'.'flCHUL^ VISTA CALIFORNIA IJ1910/:G191 G~n-5101
.
Page 2
Margarita Romero
July 17, 1992
Therefore, the mitigation measure requiring the Phase I
Assessment will become effective prior to the issuance of any
grading or building permits on the property, and it shall be the
owner's responsibility to notify anyone planning to develop the
site of these pending requirements.
Please let me know if you have any questions: 'I hope this
answers your concerns regarding your proposed project.
Sincerely,
~ ~ t. . Ylu.W-'t.
Maryann C. Miller
Environmental Review Coordinator
cc: Bob Leiter
Doug Reid
,
j- 1/:,:,(
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
~WEETWATER AUTHORI1 f
~E.nv~~
m
'!:-;""'h
C: ''t''
~,~ ~
'(;~"Ov.\'"
505 GARRETT AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 2328
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91912-2328
(619) 420-1413
FAX (619) 425-7469
RECEIVED
GOVERNING BOAAD
SUE JARRETT. CHAIRMAN
BUD POCKlINGTON. VICE CHAIRMAN
WAYNE W SMITH
EDWIN J STEELE
GEORGE H WATERS
MARGARET A. WELSH
CARY F. WRIGHT
April 29, 1992
PLAtvlV/fJG
WANDA AVERY
TREASUREA
DIAN J REEvES
SECRETARY-ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE
City of Chu1a vista Planning Dept.
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
SUbject: WATER AVAILABILITY
126 DEL MONTE AVENUE
A.P.N. 629-060-08, INITIAL STUDY NO. 15-92-39
Gentlemen
This letter is in response to the subject initial study for the referenced
project within the Sweetwater Authority service area. There is a 4-inch C.I.
water main in Del Monte Avenue adjacent to the proposed developm~nt. Our
records indicate one existing service to the proposed development. Enclosed
is a copy of 1/4 SEC. 23A map which shows this facility.
At this time, we cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing system to
provide domestic service and/or fire protection. As plans develop for
structures, the Owner must submit a letter to the Authority from the
appropriate fire agency stating fire flow requirements. Based on this
requirement, this project may result in a need for new water systems or
substantial alteration to the existing water system.
If the Owner provides the required fire flow information and enters into an
agreement for water facility improvements with the Authority, water service
can be obtained at a pressure range from a maximum of 83 p.s.i. to a minimum
of 58 p.s.i.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Tom Justo at 420-1413.
Very truly yours,
SWEETWATER AUTHORITY
/~
Richard A. eynolds
Chief Engineer
RAR:TJ:ln
k:\lorelei\wp51\delmonte.ltr
enclosure photocopy of 1/4 SEC. 23A map
/- 1/3
A Public Agency,
Serving National City, Chula Vista and Surrounding Areas
ROUT! NG FORM
DATE:
lT€C€/'I/€D
Apri 1 20, 1992
.~.
-ie.
Fro''''t,
Ken Larson, Building & Housing PLANN
John Lippitt, Engineering ~EIR only) /NC
Cliff Swanson, Engineering EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering EIR only}
Roger Daoust, Engineering (15/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chul. Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Other
FROM: Tc. ~
Maryann Mi ller
Environmental Section
SUBJECT:
~ Application for Initial Study (15- 92-39
c::J Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days}(EIR-
r::J Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-
c::J Review of Environmental Review Record
/FA- 577
IFB-
IFB-
FC-
IDP 923
IDP
IDP
IERR-
)
)
)
)
.
The croject consists of: General Plan Amendment and Rezone on 14,500 sq. ft. lot
he existing four inch water main on Del Monte Avenue will not provide~ the ~requireJ
fire flow for the proposed building. A fully automatic fire sprinkler will be
required for the proposed building and to satisfy lack of all weather surface on
the property for fire department apparatus. The automatic fire sprinkler system
will save the applicant the costly alternative of upgrading the water main to
provide the required flow and the cost of paving the yard area in addition to
providing a turnaround on the property fQr fire apparatus. . Horsfall XSOS7
~ocation: 126 Del Monte Avenue
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by Mav 4. 1992 .
Conrnents:
-'
/- t./ i
BOARD OF eDUCATION
JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, Ph.D.
LARRY CUNN INGHAM
SHARON GILES
PATRICK A. JUDD
GREG R. SANDOVAL
SUPERINTENDENT
JOHN F. VUGRIN. Ph.D
CHULA Vl~J.A ELEMENTARY SCHOUL DIS'IRICT
84 EAST "J" STREET. CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 . 619425-9600
EACH CHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH
RECEIVED
April 23, 1992
Ms. Maryann Miller
Environmental Review Dept.
City of Chula vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
PLANNING
RE:
1S-92-39 /
Location:
Applicant:
Project:
Change
FA-577/ DP-923
126 Del Monte Avenue
Margarita Romero
General Plan Amendment/Zone
Dear Ms. Miller:
advise you that the project, located at 126 Del
is within the Chula vista Elementary School
serves children from Kindergarten through
This is to
Monte Avenue,
District which
Grade 6.
District enrollment has been increasing at the rate of 4-5
percent over the past several years, and this is projected
to continue. Permanent capacity has been exceeded at many
schools and temporary relocatable classrooms are being
utilized to accommodate increased enrollments. The District
also buses students outside their attendance areas, both to
accommodate growth and assist in achieving ethnic balance.
state law currently provides for a developer fee of $.26 for
non-residential area to be charged (Chula vista Elementary
School District $.12/square foot; Sweetwater Union High
School District $.14/square foot. Fees increase to $.27
on May 18, 1992) to assist in financing facilities needed to
serve growth.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
~~~~
Kate Shurson
Director of Planning & Facilities
KS:dp
cc: Margarita Romero
Jerry Stafford
j- ~S
'C"".'- .- .. 10 "
'. !I ' . ~ ~
"
II 11...
I,
I : of..
! ~ .
N !
. N
. .
I
.- ..C. 'e4
II
-
2 S ~
.,...
,V ~ ~ !I
,..- ,
..
.u'
~ s a
~
.
:r
J"
5-
.-
-"U
... IOu-
,.; '"'....
" <Co.
~ ..!:!!:!
.. ,,<C
3 .. q
:.. r:ta
T-.
'eo ...'J:~f
,
u.
tin'
.... c.
=ci .
.0.
-. .
-- .
","...
'0
'e.
~ f"
;\
I \
I \
I \
I
U -:
-:5E e
'""'OCl' '"
2i.. '"
4Th
I
<\
,...n! . , ~ -
0J11 '"' - Y tlj
'--:-:...- ~
~HERrl )~~;I
..
'"
LU
1...
4.
U
~
M
0") g
...... ,-
G ~(t
s::. N >
c--;.:_(';G
('-. ,......... X
>- d. ::) Q
r .. ., ..-_~ '-._ 0
l _ c { ).......
:/I 0 S: .L.', .- .2
r:: ,,- c.' ., . 10-
2 c:: - n < c...
....,.- r. =.' ,..:
~ -c. :::: '_ (.-: (f)
'-" :.- 7". -- :J >-.
.2 0 :--: ~--; ~
'- (' =-= '-'
, , r. '"'~
% ~ :~ c c
c c ~~ -t
x c ~ -- .\:..' 0
o .~ r' >-
" '. 'c ;;
::,,-~I...--'~O
~~- r',~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
I ~
.-..,. US24
'U_o.AIOOZ'-
Z '.0.
~
, 01)
~ 0'
., ;=
.J., ~ _
r-Y
<:
~~
r~:
...U
W:\
tGooO.....Q-ri
~
t~ ,,!!.
-u;..eG,i :'
<i
~O\V
':t
,
9~ j
!
~ I ~ ~
V sjl<)t ;I
i
. a ~
~~ I~ ~
I'f' I
'9...... -..~ 1""-1 c.
I'
I-
I
~
.
~
.
.
.
~
,
I ~.",.
.o~ I .
.~
..0. "UJOZ :td. J=: I
. ",,~~ '\It
-.~l ~
,,'
."'1
.,
'" ' .
r:
, I
I
.s 1 ~ , , . f< ~ s
i I ~~ ~ ~ I ~
j - OI'1'HT "",ING
..0"" .... 111 -"t.\I...O.IitJC~t -8" ~. I(C,<9 W.O. ';)17~ 1
"II . .o-;u-
-~
\.
"-- f., <2
,,~ ~
\\'f~
.
.
~\
IOC'. 10. ....C. "co. 'II "'Q.",,~ ~ .......... _~J \
~I~(j
""I; ~
~ PRo j Ec.. T +-..
S\TE~
I i ~ I
i i
8 ~
~ E
~
Ii
U
n
w '
~
~
!
!
-
.!!tt1' IUCIM.1. ."'IN' TN.I
MU'.!!.:~tr..
...__ r-"T' 0000II
"'.M.'U
r-::::-.,
(".iF:'
t::::
....~
&NEETWA"T1O.P. CIS"TR1Ci
/- L.j 40
f:,~
i
,
" .
t If: ~
- .
~ ...
I
ill
! I
"t '"
~ ~ 2
.~ "
,
"_0
....;;., ..
......."
-.....
~
1
S
i
w
~
"41 7A
u
.
,
.
.
"
i
I
"
!
~
HII! ~ ~
. ~ t
,
"o#'K'"'''~'''
"''''"'''~
6'
.....>1.
,
3.....,9_
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
::
..
~
...
,
,
,
,
L.... ~ 19< ~
z..........(tJ.
"f'OI
zz~
"'~r..~19' ~
r=....... I
fft19! Z24
~!!Io' CII.J4.0 ----z.
z:1~ ZZ3 (
~
L_ ~'9 ZZZ t
2b4"''''~,.. 2>,1
z.~t_ ,.
~19 220~
~ ''''021 9
%504&' z,.
i I
s'
~
16,,!,'-
L\ 0<
I ~
,99 200 20'
i 5':~ ()
.\
\
co~c:
?~-C.
J...
U
I~
,,;
,
.11
. aj
J~
I
,~
.,;
II
h
- I~
I Ii
!
..
I
I
'ii~i
.-
-!~.'
l;i1:1
. 8
':I~!
1'-: ·
:;UJ-';...
-" ~
j ~ ~ J.=
. .I,
.- So'
-I.!..,!
j_.. "
..-:~.-
UHf
.:
.
-
'"
'fI
It:
- ..
. .-
,:j1
.1d
-f-h
- i
I _
'J.a
I". .
r;E
-1-
2:-:
..~...
..
il:., ::..
\. '>.1 ..)1
~
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
's ..
Ii I
-.. .
iII- J-
i=
~i i
Ii 8, ,
- .
.. -- .
-... -
I ii 1
- i' Ii
E.Ii I
.:
c,; . .;
..;
-
-
\ .
.~~
Ifi
. -
. l
Ii'~
,.
.. II
1;ti
'}=
. .
i..j
.flu
u r 'I'
M Ii... .1 l
= ,II II '
! ~~, Ii . I
i I~: .1;= t
'J ~I. a J Ii
i Jh JI; h
--. I~ :;;:
j .,;.. .. - ..
.;
-._-....._--
,
'J!
r
-
rl
II
.
it)
Joa,!
1-
:;::
:Ii
c-&
Ii,
I. \1 ~I \1
: I
"
; a
S J':: I
~ I.. _I : . it., :!
}, i i i I ~ ~ it I!... .~
1 -at... 'I Iii. .,~.Ii
'I- ''I. - I . - .!i
I J i - i J i 1 Ii I.,; .. ..
- - .. .;.. j II _
..
/~ L( 7
.
;;
.
!
a
~
e
.
I
5
"I ~I "'I ~I ::'1 1 \1 ~I
I I I I I ~I I ~I I
I I I I I I I I I
r .=r~ t' ~;I , I I .,
- '.-. i =1
.. - 1-- 1 ..
.. I'j! ,:: . .
, ,- e _ -. I
I " ! II Ih ! . - , I
.. I
r .. ~..~ U 1: I i -I
'1 illi~ ,1 I .= i a I'i .:
-t r -...
. iC .
,Ci - - i
... ;1' h a'" I !
.f , ,"1~~ " . I, ! .. ,h
.- ., -'I
II = --;, I~... !i.-: -! : i , c- =!!
. -) ". I;;:' Eo: Ii!
- : jii Ii - .-
n i I f:i '-1 i~ 11 :.1
~ .HE' w-t Ii li-
II -I':': - d
j i !d
.; . .- .- .. .; i .- .-
.. .. " . ..
J;
~
.
I
'I
)1 'I
~I -'1
-'-'I
I i'.~H i Uli I: a; .. . I' i'!
... Ui .
- ,!
~i!J , 11 ~ I'U. u=
f J ' u ,~ i ';':;: I' ,.1
I~i. ~fi~ 'i'
i:1 ,... d ,1-= I ~f!
, ,I 1-. ,
fl'! .E I-I: 'Ii =JI II
I... ,i ili 11'':'' I~ .
II! .r
. j -); ~l ,ao; . " i ~, ,,'-
'Ji f' . .'
.,.... o;,! 'i' ~ If;
tirh . ,=i -
.II J' .. t:: I-I jJif i · f!'1 J ... I'-! .
I! E!"3! I~ li~~E loI! I ~. ja-
.~d1 'It ! .u _i
Ii' ilU Ie: I. -ill
. 1
.. .. ..: .- .- - It .. .- ..
.. ;-'-1'6 I
I
~
-
-:
f
o
~
"
.
o
..
~
MU
I;;:
-...
~-
".
.~
o
~ .
c.
,;
\1
OM
~.
--
OU
.-
~"f
-.
..:
~I
.
o
ij
0-
...
..
ft
:~
OS'"
. 0
-
~ ...
_.tfi
-
~J:
f.~
lie';
~_.
~ 0
~~
- 0-
- M"
;;~~~<..
. =
. 0 ~
=i=.
~&g.i!'
j~ii
u._
..-
101-.... 0
-...........
- 0-
.. 0
:IIC''''~
....0..
~I
\1
I,
-I
.
o
pI
1~~
h..
<
~.l
00
~ ";
- .
f:':~
u ~ r.
.f= II
0.<
M~ 0
.. ..~
- 0
~rll'"
111_" 1/
......-1.,1
......:11...
.c_ 0':1
:II .. II 0
"""......
:.1
\,
U-
-..
... -
...-
--
. U
.....
U
..
-..
::
':./
,>,
1,
-
!
..
o
t
~
.;
!!
=
U
-
...
~
M
.
~
.
.
.
-
.!
..
";
~
]
...
o
I
-
~
~
.
o
..
i
M
...~
O~
~ t
=0
.;
..;
"M
O;!
ro
.1
1a
-~
00
M~
&:
e~
..~
,
..
..
.
~
!
..
~
~
e
..
!
...
~
!
~
U
.
f
..
o
~
o
..
.
.
~
~
o
i
"
M
~
..
J
..
.
"'M
..,
:J
-.
-...
;;
.J
M~
'" ~
- ~
~....~
MUU
t--
'" ic
...-..
:!:
I;
..
3:
~
-
=
i
o
.
g.
...-
o~
..
of
U
. ..
. <
.-
n
<-
_U
. .
z-
to:;
o
;;
--
~-
. U
. .
.....
':;
g
~
U
"
-
-
;;
.
" I ~I 'I "I >1 ':..1 :"1
.:,1 il
I I
- i' . ~ ..... . . I~ ... .I - i!'- E "0
- = r:: ~ "0 ~L ~~ - _i!' o-
M ~ ! g.
& 0 II-~)o"" ... ~- ..
... . -i-II... ';1 .~ . -to
e 0 c t_~.1 :;~ . ... .. O. ;; E
o 0 .."
.. . u...,&::_ ~&= -I 1 .. . .
0 ~ Jc........ i i'~ .....
M ~=-(.1 ;; -0
1 . . .1 0 I I
.. o~ -... I~ -
.. .. - I;... ..- \I .'D.i "~... = ..
0 t .=- pi -0 ...
1~01'O: ~.~ .. :;;.. ~ e. .
0 . ..II -
= 0 ;;1 ..
.. -:: 0;: So ~- . ! .. - .
0 t ta .
;; .~ o,S....:II 0-0 .. -- oJ u..
J ..... .0 JU .... .-
1= -:II -... t i-= .IS"; .. o. t::>
.. &-"'1'10 - -. o.
..~o ...:: f ... - ..
~r II ...~... . 0 U . . la . ...
,; 0 c;'i..~ .. . . ~ ~ii ... . J! -
i .0 ;; . -g ." oa -
..~ .. f- 0'11:) 0 --< :: r~ .; -~ ..]
- - - . i ... I. -- .0
... _ U "'''' ..~ ....~ ~ -~ 0-
0 0....._ .... ouu ;::~ go . - ~. -~"
- -- .; ... 0 .. .. _ < e ;~ ~- -.. e 0 ..-
.I - - 0 -=.:c.::c .... o~ .. ~ -0 ... - .. ~'; t
n - -:: rr ." . .i_ ~. . U u_ .. -
~ ~ ~ ....Z.. ! ~ " . .. .. ~ . . u....
~:; UI .~ - t_ .~ ...u ... ...)
<<'01'5'0 :~- 'ire .u ..- o . c~
- -. ... &: ~... "..
"~ 0 _.0 ir. ~
1;"; ~ -~ -~~ ~&
I" M__
~- M u~ ';;'8 ee
~t .; .. .; ..; 0" .; ..; ..; .,;
.. ." .....
.,; co = '" :: /-<1 cr ~
a
~
.
.
~
~
co
~
t
~
.;
..;
..;
.
..:
..
..
..
\I
0; .J,!.!~"j UI'. to
...:a-iil i :Ii
1~liil! t~j~~
J. U:-' 'i!' .Iii
i li~!!I.I!:U~
; SI:i"j:j!lJ:~
f ""'5"u.J Ii
'.. '..'::iH'thlt=
....-I-t-
i ~"iijii~wil~t~ .
-
..
.
u
I I~
.11
I !1
! J.i
~ 11...
i "Ji
.
. !,!J
i IIi
Jii .
- .
.:
-
.
I
1
I
.!I':~
---
.," ..~
-~i::
I. J
I..&..~
- ..,
-. I.
I,\!=a:
- po;;::
i ,.t
.. n .-:
"I ....
'i';!tU
J._I) '"
.. .'tJ..;
lit....
~.,.-..
li".;1
JI-::
.. t.
-
.
i
1
"
.
..
-
>1
\1
\,
:I.!f~!fii '11~lji;l= _lit
"JI-:-11 ij~'!:-! j ~
'f ~I!" JiiJt~!i illi
J"~-li~i 'I-il..t~;! J.i
II i :!=~ Ii J=iil. Ii..'
u:!iIJj rl:-it!!=,:;" uU
~1-"llwr, ~'Ir II I. .t -
~ I -;;1 ~--..!~ -~ ~.i~
i W.i~" !~:..~ j!. ~.
j,,;i!iili JERk!;I'! = ~
\.1 \1
.I';
....
it:
I~=
,i!
;:11
51!
j..~
I'!
III
= Z
I I
I I
.;
"'-I
\1
!':f i:1 =~E
... .... It..
.H .i1 fs
jI =!i J j
-! 'i Iii:: 1# I
I':: -Ihl _Iii
J. ';..# ,..' .,
:I~j ~R~f Ij;i
1 id~ iit: J"n .
..
a .; ..
.;
a:
.
'Ii
!
a
..~
"II
1&
..
-.
ij
..:.
It
_1'1
!..
,I
-
11=
_it
--
51
.
.
'Ii
1_ 5u
I
~
-
JII. Detenlin.tion
(To be completed by the L..d Agency.)
On the b.sis of this infti.l .v.lu.tfon:
I find th.t the proposed project COULD NOT h.ve a signific.nt .ff.ct on
the environment, and. NEGATIVE DECLARATION wfll be pr.p.red.......[ ]
I find th.t although the propos.d project could h.ve a significlnt
.ffect on the .nvi, ronment there wt11 not.be a significlnt .ffect in
this case bec.use the .it ig.t ion Masures described on an attached
sheet have been .dded to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WILL BE PREPARED...................................................[ ]
1 find the proposed project MAY have a signific.nt .ffect on the
environment, .nd .n ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required........[ ]
6' l'f- '71...-
Date
}1t?tM{GAUt ~ . ~
Signature
For (~){11..~
IV. SUMMARY OF ISSUES
List 111 S igni fi Clnt or potent filly signi ficant implcts identi fied in
the Initill Study checklist form.
YES MAYBE
rh ..' ,/
{',
o
. .. ., /
\ .' ,..' - t
A;,:..{J
vi
/- 51
M. DE MINIMIS FEE prrERMINATION
(Ch~ter 1706, Statutes of IttO - AS 3158)
~ It is hereby found that thts project invD1Yts liD potential fDr.
any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively on
wildlife reSDurces and that a .Certificate of Fee Exelllption"
shall be prepared for this project.
_ It is hereby found that thts project .could potentially illpact
wildlife, individually or cUIIUlatively and therefore fees in
accordance with SectiDn 711.4 (d) of the Fish and CIIDe Code
shall be paid to the County Clerk.
~ .
. ~h (J -}.1A..l-Ut.{
Environmentall ev ew Coordinator
5.Z'1-1~
'Oate
,
.
(- 5::{
-
THE CJ1}' OF CHUU J-7STA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement oC disclosure oC cenain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the pan oC the City Council, Planriing Commission, and all other
official bodies, Tbe Collowing information must be disclosed:
1. List the names oC all persons having a financial interest in the contract, ie.. contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
None
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or pannership, list the names oC all
individuals owning more than 10% oC the shares in the corporation or owning any pannership
interest in the pannership.
None
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organiiation or a trust, list the names
oC any person serving as director oC the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor oC the trust.
None
4. Have you had more than S250 wonh oC business transacted with any member oC the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_
No 2.. If yes, please indicate person(s):
S. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you be Core the City in this matter.
None
6. Have you and/or your oCCicets or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than SI,OOO to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No L If yes, state which
Councilmember( s):
~ is delined as: .Any individual,Jim., co.pnnn=IIip,joinr ventl/re, tuSoeintion.loeial club./ratemnl OtJ:anizlltiOll, cOtporntion.
<"/(11.', trust, recei,'", 'Yndicale, thil and allY Diller COUIlty. cif)' allll COUIlfT)~ cif); nWllicipnlif)', district fIT <<Iter politicallUbdi"iJiulI,
or all)' OIh" J:rOllp or combinntion aCling OJ a unit.. If -/
'tr/--:
(NOTE: Auach addilional pages as neCCSs.1ry) "'" -- --.
.'t .
D;I!~: 3-23-92
/ S3
Signalur,t o' tr.!tTOr7app ICilnt
/fgtj~~ :,~ Of~~r:2;'.1!.~ /?)_
,. \'/". \.D~CLQSI' T""n