Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1992/07/08 (13) city Planning commission Agenda Item for Meeting of July 8, 1992 6. PUBLIC HEARING: variance ZAV-92-12; Request to reduce rearvard setback from 20 feet to 6 feet at 671 Crescent Drive - Corazon C. Van Heeke. A. BACKGROUND 1. The request is to reduce the required rearyard setback in order to legalize an already-constructed sunroom behind the single family residence at 671 Crescent Drive in the R-I-P4 zone. The property is governed by the precise plan guidelines adopted for the Sunbow development. The request is based on the applicant's claim that the contractor who completed the work lead the applicant to believe that all required building permits had been obtained and that the sunroom was built in accordance with the applicable regulations, when in fact a permit was not obtained and the sunroom was constructed within the required rearyard setback. 2. The project is exempt from CEQA as a Class 3 exemption (Section 15303). B. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a motion to deny ZAV-92-12. C. DISCUSSION Adiacent zoninq and land use. North South East West R-I-10 R-I-P4 R-I-P4 R-I-P4 single Family Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Existinq site characteristics The subject parcel is 5,623 sq. ft. and has properties zoned for single family residential use on both sides. The rear lot line adjoins East Naples Street, with an intervening landscape buffer of approximately 10 to 15 feet. The properties across the street are also zoned for single family residential use. All of the parcels in the immediate vicinity are typically smaller than 6,000 sq. ft. The precise plan guidelines allow for a F.A.R. of 55% or a dwelling of 3,600 sq. ft., whichever is greater. 4,- ! Page 2, Item 5 Meeting Date: July 8, 1992 Like most of the neighboring parcels, the subject property had a floor area ratio on the original permit that was in excess of the maximum permitted under standard R-l zoning of 45%, as allowed for under the Sunbow precise plan guidelines. The residence without the sunroom totals 2,963 sq. ft. and has a F.A.R. of 53%. with the 336 sq. ft. sunroom the F.A.R. would be 59%, al though the total enclosed floor area would be slightly less than the 3,600 sq. ft. maximum allowed on these lots, as noted above. Request The request is to legalize an already-constructed sunroom in the rear of a single family residence. The sunroom has been constructed within 6 ft. of the rear property line, whereas the required setback is 20 ft. The applicant has advanced the argument that removal of the sunroom would cause a financial loss, and that this "hardship" is not because of anything that the applicant did. The assertion is that the contract for the sunroom specified that all required plans and permits were included. The applicant believes that, since the contractor is now out of business, she should not be held responsible for his negligence, and should not be required to remove the sunroom. D. ANALYSIS The development standards allow room additions, which adhere to the required setbacks, up to a total of 3,600 sq. ft. or 55% of the lot. An encroachment to within 5 ft. of the rear property line is allowed for open patio structures. An open patio in this instance is defined as a structure with lattice type roofing and is open on a minimum of two sides. While many neighboring property owners have added open patios, no encroaching room additions have been approved. In this instance, we can find no hardship related to the property or the dwelling which would distinguish it from other properties in the area, and thus justify a variance. If granted, it is staff's judgement that it would constitute a special privilege not enjoyed by other properties in the same zone and vicinity. The applicant would appear to have suffered a breach of contract at the hands of the building contractor. Although the applicant may well have been blameless, the Code is very clear that personal or financial difficulties, or loss of prospective profits, are not hardships justifying a variance. While we sympathize with the situation, the applicant should seek other avenues of redress. 0-~ Page 3, Item 5 Meeting Date: July 8, 1992 E. FINDINGS 1. That a hardship peculiar to the property and not created by any act of the owner exists. said hardship may include practical difficulties in developing the property for the needs of the owner consistent with the regulations of the zone; but in this context, personal, family or financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits, and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance. Further, a previous variance can never have set a precedent, for each case must be considered only on its individual merits. The property is essentially rectangular and level, and there is nothing unique about its relationship to surrounding properties. The approved dwelling contains 2,963 sq. ft. and an open patio cover may be added. It is not a hardship that the property is less than 6,000 sq. ft, since neighboring parcels have comparable areas. Any financial burden suffered by an "innocent" party in complying with the City's zoning ordinance does not meet the definition of a hardship justifying a variance. 2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same zoning district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors. There is nothing inherent in the property which deprives this parcel of the property rights enjoyed by others in the same zone and vicinity. The encroachment would constitute a special privilege of the recipient, not enjoyed by her neighbors. 3. That the authorizing of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, and will not materially impair the purposes of this chapter or the public interest. Setbacks serve to provide visual relief, as well as meeting health and safety requirements. A structure which extends so close to property lines reduces on-site open space and presents a crowded appearance, to the detriment of adjacent properties and in conflict with the purposes of this chapter and the public interest. 4. That the authorizing of such variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City or the adopted plan of any governmental agency. t.,- 3 (a.:vanhecke) Page 4, Item 5 Meeting Date: July 8, 1992 The authorizing or denial of this variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City or the adopted plan of any governmental agency. (,,-y '~~ - .-"''''~~_' \ . ~RJ \; \. /.,. ~ \ " :'\' K. I '/ . \~ r11== . . ~"""--- r~14 ~ . ::s ~ u ')-4.,..L : L =~ l T T):::: . ~~ ~~.f .J .... _I- /1 I I l'\. -.-t:^ 8~'J.._ - -' . ~' w- IA<aI~-r. 4- ~ . .f~" _I- ~;::: :IaATlc+-t"""'r--,. .=r'- - ~" I '-~f- t I '" 1-1 J11 ~" . ~ N^"':" "" _ I "- t::Jf' JIJ;-.;:: ~' ~ OCJj r7J~ ; ....... ROGERS -.., r T I..-~~~' 1 JE , ..\ ~ '@)'i!':. 1 :~' .t ~ ....~" \. ~ tJ. ~I~ j _ <t ~ [1~ t/)JJ\~Q~ :~ ~ ~ ~'L,., !iH . \ ~~# < - 0 CI 'J( 7'<..)~~ ~ =: ~ . ~ .~./t.?~::.~~~,~;j';::~ ~ =M . o~ ~. = I 0 :;};i~~~~;i~g~Xg~? ~ ~ ~. ~~ ST. ",~-:.":.,,.oJ.-:':;'/.J.:""':"~ ~"..,JIII' - l Hffij "~,J/""~-;,,'J''',~'.J~''/:''~'':'-:': d'l; ~. ~ ", .... :".,'''' > ""J',N. ..~ ~~ ~ r : ",~;.;:~'..:~-;,~::',;,~;,::,:,'f ~ ~'/I -; 0' 1 ;:.... \ ," ..:';~l~~:~~j,_F:.\'~:;~~;;'~~;" .~ N 1,1 I ' :}- '.1r"""'- ST. ~,?;),<:;:~,,:,:~\;,~?-j~~.<~~~~:.~:~' T1 r,...... 1U~ r. ~ ".. I ':",'")_o,"''''f',-'''' ., .\)"'I..:'\~~~....: ~ -, ... ~ I-- .".... '), )..... \,........".... ~ \ _"',...,,,....;. ...,:)-i\..~~...;..'\.~ : r 11/ ~ ~j,~;~,1;\\'2P - - to '/f -'./ \\ Y 1--.-;-1.,: GREG 'm-~' I __ V~ I ~- '- -'- 1- .j ~v ~~,.;'ft ROGERS ~~r 't'"""./ '- I' , ~ . - ~ < - 'r.!f~:~~_ PARK {,I" :;V / ~ \. ~ - j ~ ~ . .%*,;i'~;if';'i:'l' / / /, /II I \ \ \. ::. ~~I " . , 4 ( t:PfiAz..t'fJ v. VAN #~~ (; 11 a~twr..JPR. NOR~ ( 'lAY. '12-12 1 LOCATOR ~~Ut~ ~~~YARD ~Er~~ . ) ~ol1 I~' fO ,. FOR fA _ SU~ If-OOM . 0----.5 '. ---" -'- I L_ ~i I\. ~ ~ ~ . , I I "I ~' \\.1 ~. ~I ~I' R ~, ~! j 1 /0 \ "- tl~ ~II\) ;;, ~ ~I ~I ~i '0: ( I - I 4J! , ' V' ~I , \'C) C!) ~ ,<() ~ --L , ~ , <Sr/CcC:T & 4j)/)~S:; F4;?,,</."'- ~~~.E,<'.~ y ,i. /,/.!. - -- - ----------- ..i-- - . ,\3\ SoU/' " ~ I,' \I)' ... ~-_r_~ '-- ~ \ i I \ i - c 1- f- .,- ,,/t:.C;,A.ei/1..s~.? < ,,;. r;' r'? '72/ ....... ......~,. .. t.,;)'-=' 1/"'::> fi,z.-7 roC"'';',e 6-"'/ -T/ '..- ~ ---> A'l7 /f'9/ ..(.'.'T rA!c-,/,b&U_ .3.3~.s(-; '. .' 70TAL o:J~ r . \).. I.LL:>T/~JI~/2A"'Jt ?o .2 7SC;>rr. "- , - C7 r TAt:./.5'.r~~.e _,.;).:2.:< i. oLOTAA"EA "".s-~':;J7: 39.&:',% &:>1 , , ~ c..3 C4,e cj.40GE" " &t?a- A"t.AOf 35"'- hi /JM: y .e,4f /;f~LY )"'~ij('J #X,( ~~~ D L/G/-/T ..:-r;/'I'TSi-J " '~"- ---------..... " / 'S- 6.{,j'7...______.__1__ J!?;>/IP' -P->"'''.-u?%'.t:?7V //Jlr ,. \ \ ! r-- ql-r:- Ii\':'- , , >< 'I \ ,~ ,~' \ ~ ~ \~ \ -" "" '. ;,z \ .~~ , "- \~ \~ , r ~ , -9 /.:11 \ \ ~UL .f!)1/"I/,</G \ I I I I 18 - J I E'LC'/' .c..tA" Lc'T;i/-35 \ J illi;&)pJ;5f/LD 1 ;'1.5'/ c.41 v;A/T)7E~ Ct?k"AztY'l{!. t 671 CR-Sc'E/'/,"--,;:;,e ~J.I:I~ jll,.5'7-" c~ 1'/Ch' \ ;t'T-lif7-J' . \ />:"!#-C')I..~v.3d ~ .-Go, \ ;?rK!!U# tp;l-:1 ~7/ / 7?-O i T elF> A ~ or -!... _-;; ~ '" "\ \-1 I"....:i . ..;.C ~ ('\ \ \ \ \ " "'...... "- >< ~Z ~ ~ :\k I.-. -..' 'J ..... ;;;; \:' -.J...... - ""Z ~ "-. ~ CJ ';, ~ '-()~.j ~1~~N)' ""~"S~) ~ C;S , . "\1::'" '= "" '" Vj ~ " 't, ~ e:. ~ ,,~ ~",;, ,,"" ,\C'" ." ~ ~. .... -< ,. } j'- / .' / , .- / 1\ / / K / / '\ / / / Ij b" /J , ~ -_._-~---_._-,.,-_.. - ---_._~ _._--_._..'""-~...._--_._~.._,_._------_._-,-,-~_._--'-_......~"--~--~._-~"._------_.........._-~._~._---"-,~.~--~~-~_.~-_.._- ~--~.._'~-~-.. -"----~-.-------------......-..-------.-'--.------.-"--.-.,--.-----_.' ""~n~"_~"__'m_----"""_'__~._""",",_~'__'~_'~4_._..___._~.._ ..-( 111i~ ~-~D~-----~~-~-~"----~-'-'''.-~--''--. ----il"!2~--:!&-~X--n~ p ,..", iZ~ ..________________________________ lR M) &u ~ U-Jf.X fd;... . , -----VCL--()J-..-. ".,-- C----Cfii~T--.-..' .'..---.~..._.__~_L_.__ -.----,--- ----'. --------, -----_._-,_._.)----------~-~---_._- -. ,..------- .'- ._---_..._~-----'-_..,._-._+._,-- -,-~~~--~~-=~-=~==~--,.,~----------=~-~~=~:~.=~-~ , () .2 C "'.Q. 6 Cv/'l:t ]) r i v-'!. ---~_===_~_C;U ~-if-.'~1_~~.~_~-.-1'/-~_L/=______=~~___~~___________:_~__ - '-- r ===- --~i ,~-------=-__-_=_=-----~-~~____===_~~==== ~ 7 1 .s:..1f,{SC.!/Y1 J!f --------.-.------.--...---.---~-..-_____~_~~.n__ i----- , t) C.f~{.1-~ v/57f'l, C"I- q/'i'/I -. -~.- ----_.~._-----------~---_._-~------~ -_.~-~~~~ --~-----"-------~,_.._, My/l!..1V A--6.N(3'P01o'-<~ 0 -~-------------_____._,.___._,__ tPbB____~S;_~T :M._'--~~_____~_______ _________..._____.. elM. '--A _lIlf.7.:A____L51.~ C)f3...t.L ---------~-----_._---- --~----~._.-._- -'-- --_.._-~--_. --------._-~~--'-~_._----_.--- _EffBf'( <::$It:L_c;...:.. O~bf-oA 0?C> d6>CeN / _J7}_-:_______________._______________.___________ cifU A-.,A- 1/1:> (f+ C)f - CZ 19 l I ~~o~~~-~ -----------------------~------""~_~-- -_.._._-.~-" II< - -l ---.---.--- --._----.._---------~~- -------._--------- ----------------------. .. ...--.-.- --.. - ~ -------,----------," --..--r--',.-----..' ~-:3 -.---"",.---._---_.. THE CITY vF CHULA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSUJ(E STATEMENT Statement of discJosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, PJanning Commission, and all other officiaJ bodies, The foIlowing information must be discJosed: - 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, ),e., contractor, subcontractor, materiaJ supplier. /70 ~ ~ , If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership, ~~/ 3, If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, Jist the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. 7~/ 4, Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No -iL If yes, please indicate person(s): 5. Please identifY each and every person, incJuding any agents, employees, consultants or independent contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. 2:v-' 6, Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $],000 to a CounciJmember in the current or preceding election period'! Yes _ No V"'" If yes, state which CounciJmember(s ): rL'r~()n is defined as: ':4ny indiridual,jirm, co-partnership,jolm ~'enrlire, associmion, social club, fraternal organization, corpora/ion. l ('Sf(/fe. 111/5t, receil'Cr, syndicate, this and any OIher county, city and colln")~ city, IfIlI/tiCl/Jality, district or other pulitical sllbdh'isiun, or (lny ollter group or combination aCfing ns a unil." (,",OTE: Attach additional p~gcs as ncccss~l)') D:lte: .... r;)C) ~ 'j'.;L !\, " \DISCLOSETXIl {J~ -ZtJ/1/ (!, V,4(V /f€~ Prin! or type name of contractor/applicant 6 - 9 !I{L,\N'd: I! '_'01)01