HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1996/11/12MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Tuesday, November 12, 1996
6:06 p.m.
1. ROLL CALL:
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
ALSO PRESENT:
CALL TO ORDER
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
Councilmembers Scott D. Alevy, John S. Moot, Stephen C. Padilia, and Jerry R.
Rindone.
Mayor Shirley A. Horton
John Goss, City Manager; Ann Moore, Acting City Attorney; Beverly A. Authelet, City
Clerk; and Patricia Schwenke, Deputy City Clerk.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: None submitted.
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items pulled: None)
THE CONSENT CALENDAR, INCLUDING ITEM 11 BEING CONTINUED TO 11/19/96, WAS OFFERED
BY COUNCILMEMBER RINDONE, reading of the text was waived, titles read, passed and approved 4-0-1
with Hotton absent.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Letter from the Acting City Attorney stating that there were no repurtable actions taken in Closed Session
on 11/5/96. It is recommended that the letter be received and filed.
6. RESOLUTION 18488 AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN
DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT FOR RECEIPT OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IN THE AMOUNT
OF $15,000 FOR CHULA VISTA EXPO '97 AND APPROPRIATING $15,000 FROM THE
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND, AND APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF
SAID CITY FUNDING TO CONDUCT THE 1997 EXPO EVENT PRIOR TO PORT DISTRICT
REIMBURSEMENT - In July 1996, the City submitted a financial assistance request to the San Diego Unified Port
District for partial funding of the 1997 Expo event. The Board of Port Commissions approved the request at their
meeting of 8/20/96, and the Port is now requiring the City to enter into a formal agreement which stipulates
conditions and requirements for receipt of the approved funding. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Parks and Recreation) 4/5th's vote required.
Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page 2
7. RESOLUTION 18489 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
ADA RENOVATIONS PHASE II AT 25 SITES IN THE CITY (GG-144C) - The work to be done consists of
modifying existing restrooms to accommodate individuals with disabilities. The work includes minor demolition
work, construction of interior walls, plumbing lixtures, doors, hardware, signage, and ~terior finishes. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution and awarding contract to Famania Construction. (Director of Public Works
and Director of Building and Housing)
8. RESOLUTION 18490 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR "MEMORIAL PARK
STAGE IMPROVEMENTS (PR-168) AND EUCALYPTUS PARK SITE IMPROVEMENTS (PR-146) IN THE
CITY"; AND RE-APPROPRIATING $8,030 IN PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDS
FROM PR-183 (PLAYGROUND RENOVATION PHASE II) TO MEMORIAL PARK STAGE
IMPROVEMENTS (PR-168) On 10/9/96, sealed bids were received. The work to be done consists of constructing
access to the children's play equipment at Eucalyptus Park and constructing an expansion to the existing stage area
at Memorial Park. Staff' recommends approval of the resolution awarding the contract to Fox Construction - San
Diego in the amount of $114,715. (Director of Public Works)
9. RESOLUTION 18491 APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH DKS
ASSOCIATES FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM UPGRADE TECHNICAL DESIGN STUDY (CIP TF 237),
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT - On 11/14/95, Council apprnved
an agreement with DKS Associates to design an adaptive traffic control signal system. DKS has completed Tasks
1 and 3 of the contract and is currently working on Tasks 2 and 4. Task 2 includes specifications for the system
and Task 4 is preparation of the plans, specifications and estimates for Phase II of the project. DKS has submitted
a proposal to evaluate use of video detection in lieu of the standard loop detection and to prepare plans and
specifications for use by the City in the Phase II work. Staff believes it would be beneficial to include this work
under Task 2 of the contract. Start reco~mnends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
10.A. RESOLUTION 18492 APPROVING FINAL MAP OF TRACT 88-3A, EASTLAKE SOUTH GREENS
UNIT 3 (SOUTH HALF), ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC THE PUBLIC STREETS
DEDICATED ON SAID MAP, REJECTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY THE OPEN SPACE LOTS
GRANTED ON SAID MAP, ACCEPTING THE EASEMENTS GRANTED ON SAID MAP WITHIN SAID
SUBDIVISION, AND APPROVING SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE
COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY SAID SUBDIVISION, AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT - On 7/18/89, Council approved the Tentative Subdivision Map
for Tract 88-3, EastLake Greens. On 8/16/94, Council approved the amended tentative map for EastLake South
Greens, Tentative Map 88-3A, and imposed additional conditions of approval. The amendment to the tentative map
covers the area south of Clubhouse Drive which is designated as EastLake South Greens. Staff recommends
approval of the resolutions. (Director of Public Works)
B. RESOLUTION 18493 APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR EASTLAKE SOUTH GREENS UNIT 3 (SOUTH HALF) REQUIRING DEVELOPER TO COMPLY
WITH CERTAIN UNFULFILLED CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTIONS NUMBER 15200 AND 17618, AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUI'E SAME
11. RESOLUTION 18494 DISSOLVING THE COUNCIL APPOINTED INTERIM BECA BOARD AND
AUTHORIZING STAFF TO APPOINT THE MEMBERS OF THE ADVISORY BOARD TO CONTINUE
IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO STAFF - On 8/22/95, Council approved an Interim BECA Advisory Board
Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page 3
represented by 11 organizations/individuals. These organizations/individuals were recommended by staff to provide
a mix of public and private entities who are stakeholders in the regional BECA alliance. The Board's contributions
include working with staff in the areas of coordinating and levemging regional resources, enhanced program
marketing, and providing technical advice. These functions may be best served by the Board continuing to act in
an advisory capacity to the BECA program and staff. For the purposes of legal clarification, staff is recommending
the existing Interim Board, as appointed by Council, be dissolved and the new Board membership be selected by
staff. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Community Development) Continued to the
meeting of 11/19/96.
* * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * *
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
12.A. RESOLUTION 18416 APPROVING A RESOURCE CONVEYANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE
OTAY RANCH SPA ONE, TRACT 96-04 - (This is a rdated item. but does not reouire a public hearing)
B. RESOLUTION 18417 APPROVING AN INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT WITH VILLAGE
DEVELOPMENT FOR TRACT 96-04 - (This is a related item. but does not reouire a public hearing)
C. PUBLIC HEARING PCS 96-04: CONSIDERATION OF A REVISED TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
FOR THE OTAY RANCH SPA ONE, TRACT 96-04 GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF TELEGRAPH
CANYON ROAD BETWEEN PASEO RANCHERO AND THE FUTURE SR-125 ALIGNMENT AND
EXCLUDING 288 ACRES IN ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER (APN) 642-060-11 AND A PORTION OF APN
642-080-11 - Adopt a Second Addendure to FEIR 95-01 and recertify FEIR 95-01 and the First Addendum for the
Otay Ranch SPA One and Tentative Subdivision Map for Village One and Phase 1-A of Village Five of the Otay
Ranch SPA One, Chula Vista Tract 96-04, in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained
in the draft resolution. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions. (Otay Ranch Manager) Continued from
the meeting of 9/17/96.
D. RESOLUTION 18398 ADOPTING THE SECOND ADDENDUM TO AND CERTIFYING FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FEIR 95-01 (SCH #95021012) AND FIRST ADDENDUM
READOPTING THE STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND THE MITIGATION
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE FEIR AND APPROVING A REVISED
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR PORTIONS OF THE OTAY RANCHO SPA ONE, CHULA VISTA
TRACT 96-04, AND MAKING THE NECESSARY FINDINGS AND CONTINUING ALTERNATIVE
TENTATIVE MAP PROPOSALS
This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was declared open.
There being no speakers, the public hearing was declared closed.
Jerry Jamriska, Otay Ranch Special Planning Projects Manager, indicated that the applicant requested a one-week
continuance.
Councilmember Rindone asked if this item could be continued to 12/10/96 for the new council.
Kim Kilkenny, Vice President of Village Development, answered they were anxious to move forward and preferred
a one-week continuance.
Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page 4
Mayor Pro Tern Moot also preferred a one-week continuance, because the current Council was familiar with the
subject, and it would be most appropriate for them to resolve it.
MSC (Alevy/Rindone) to continue to 11/19/96, approved 4-0-1 with Horton absent.
13. PUBLIC HEARING ADOPTING OTAY RANCH PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT VVITH VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT - An amendment to the development agreement to further
guarantee infrastructure improvements where the developer wants to create parcels for sale prior to fmalizing the
final subdivision map. The amendment also addresses future problems with regard to any debt payment that might
be levied to make public improvements or should development be only partially completed on any paaietdar project
due to any stoppage of work especially due to a bankruptcy action. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance
on first reading. (Deputy City Manager, planning Director, and Otay Ranch Manager)
ORDINANCE 2691 AMENDING OTAY RANCH PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN OTAY RANCH, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, VILLAGE
DEVELOPMENT, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA (first
reading)
This being the time and place as advertised, the public heating was declared open.
There being no speakers, the public hearing was declared closed.
MSC (Padi!la/Alevy) to continue to 11/19/96, approved 4-0-1 with Horton absent.
14. PUBLIC HEARING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (AD 93-01) FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF
SECOND AVENUE AND SOUTH OF "J" STREET - On 10/15/96, Council accepted the filing of the Engineer' s
Report by the City Engineer on the cost of construction and setfrog 11/12/96 at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time for
a public hearing on an assessment district for alley improvements east of Second Avenue. Staff recommends
approval of the resolutions. (Director of Public Works)
A. RESOLUTION 18495 CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT BY THE CITY ENGINEER ON
THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION AND SPREAD OF ASSESSMENTS ON ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NUMBER 93-01 FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF SECOND AVENUE AND SOUTH OF "J"
STREET
B. RESOLUTION 18496 ADOPTING A NOTICE OF LIEN TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 93-01 FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF SECOND
AVENUE AND SOUTH OF "J" STREET
Mayor Pro Tern Moot explained that because of the recently passed Proposition 218, staff would need additional
time to analyze whether this assessment district was consistent with the resolution.
Ann Moore, Acting City Attorney, advised it was not necessary to open the public heating if the item was continued
indefinitely. The exemptions provided under Proposition 218 were vague and additional time was needed to analyze
it with respect to particular assessment districts.
Councilmember Alevy believed his understanding of Proposition 218 included facilities that were built, completed,
and previously voted on.
Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page 5
John Lippitt, Director of Public Works, indicated a petition was signed by 65 percent of the property owners, and
the assessments for these types of districts would not be levied until after the hearing.
MSC (Alevy/Padilla) to continue this item indefinitely until staff has a chance to look at the implications of
Proposition 218 on this issue, approved 4-0-1 with Horton absent.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
· Bill Ayers, 44 East Mankato Street, Chula Vista, CA, representing the San Diego County Veterans Advisory
Committee, requested a report from Council regarding the veterans preference status.
Mayor Pro Tem Moot stated the recently passed Proposition 209 might impact all preference programs, and
although he hoped the proposition did not apply to veterans, staff wmdd research it.
John Goss, City Manager, stated he would provide Mr. Ayers with written material regarding a certain limited
amount of veterans preference that could apply.
BOARD AND COI%!MISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
None submitted.
ACTION ITEMS
15. RESOLUTION 18497 APPROVING COUNCIL POLICY REGARDING REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT
FOR OUTSIDE LEGAL ASSISTANCE OBTAINED BY EMPLOYEES APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL -
On 6/11/96, Council directed staff to prepare a policy for Council's consideration regarding legal representation
in special circumstances. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (City Manager)
Councilmember Rindone indicated concern that the policy applied to only a portion of staff, and he asked if other
employees had similar protection.
Mayor Pro Tem Moot explained the policy was only for those persons serving at the pleasure of the City Council
and who were subject to removal by a majority vote of Council.
Ms. Moore advised Council the policy specifically applied to the City Attomey, City Manager, and City Clerk.
RESOLUTION 18497 OFFERED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALEVY, reading of the text was waived, title
read, passed and approved 3-1-1 with Rindone opposed and Horton absent.
16. RESOLUTION 18455 APPROVING TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SALE OF MARINA VIEW
PARK TO THE UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO PREPARE AND EXECUTE
A PURCHASE AND SALES AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS - The City has requested that
the Unified Port District acquire certain City and Redevelopment Agency properties on the Bayfront, including
Marina View Park on Marina Parkway and three properties on Lagoon Drive (the former Marina Motor Hotel,
Shangri-La and Cappos properties). City staff has been negotiating the sale of these properties which have been
Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page 6
delayed for a variety of reasons including legal incumbrance and contaminated soils which are now close to
resolution. Staff has recently received amended terms of sale for the Marina View Park property which are
acceptable and are being tbrwarded to Council for review and authorization to proceed. Staff recommends approval
of the resolution. (Director of Community Development) Continued from the meeting of 11/5/96.
Chris Salomone, Director of Conm~unity Development, stated the issue began over a year ago when staff was
directed to explore the sale of properties deemed either surplus or capable of being sold without major impacts to
the Redevelopmerit Agency. This parcel was appraised at highest and best use, and staff requested direction from
Council regarding specific protections such as a first right of refusal or option. The Port will notify the City in the
event any potential change of use of this parcel is imminent. The use is not likely to change from a park, because
one of the Port purposes is to provide recreational amenities. If this resolution is approved, Marina View Park
would fall under Port jurisdiction, who would have land use control under State authority. Our protection would
be our positive relationship with the Port, as the City and the Port share the same interests and are currently
undergoing joint master planning efforts in building capital improvements to develop the Bayfront. The park is
currently zoned for recreation and could not be changed without an amendment to the Local Coastal Plan.
Councilmember Padilia indicated concern the agreement did not contain a provision for a meet and confer on future
use proposals. He understood that review and approvals were required tbr a land use change in this particular area,
but he was uncomfortable there were no provisions in the agreement for safeguards. Although the City benefits
from the sale, he wanted assurance the land remains a park in the future.
Councilmember Rindone had similar concerns and referenced a letter received from Jess Vandeventer. He believed
Mr. Vandeventer tried to make a genuine effort in providing assurances with the safeguards currently in place. He
also corresponded with Mr. Vandeventer expressing those concerns and hoped further negotiations would provide
additional safeguards. Through further dialogue and meet and confer efforts, he believes the Port could provide
assurances that Marina View Park will remain a park.
Councilmember Alevy asked if the agreement coold include a clause to provide the City protection.
Mr. Salomone explained the land was appraised at its highest and best use, and if the City insisted on the land being
in perpetuity deemed a park, it would affect the value and the Port would re-appraise the land.
Mr. Goss believed the Port was not supportive to guarantee the land in perpetuity being a park. One-half of the
park was already owned and controlled by the Port, and it would be difficult to change the park to another use.
This is a good deal for the City to have a park approved at a commercial value, and if the resolution is approved,
it would be a major step to reduce the Redevelopment Agency's deficit.
Councilmember Padilia expressed the concern that if the agreement stated under no conditions would Marina View
Park be anything other than a park, the Port would insist on re-appraising the land. If the Port District staff was
sure this would remain a park, they would not be settling for negotiations with the City to purchase the land at the
highest and best assessed value. He believes the Port is committed to making sure the park remains a use we can
enjoy and benefit from, but there remains a risk because the agreement does not reflect that.
Mr. Goss did not believe the Port viewed this land as foture commercial property. Several years ago, the City was
able to get several items listed in their Capital Improvement Program, which was also part of the Port Capital
Improvement Program, and they could be implemented as long as there were no major changes. It is a process the
City and the Port started and were trying to execute.
Mayor Pro Tem Moot stated approximately four to five months ago this issue was discussed, and the continuance
or passage of time have not materially changed regarding this matter. It was clear the Port was trying to do the
Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page 7
City of Chula Vista a favor in giving an enhanced value for this land. Several years ago the Port made a
commitment as part of their Capital Improvement Program, and they have a fiduciary duty to the people they
represent. He would not support this if he believed the Port would take an existing park, half of which they already
own, and convert it to something else; the Port Chair and the City's Port member have assured this will remain a
park. Council has the option to accept the assurances that were given in good faith and put some additional money
in the City's budget for potentially giving raises to employees, raises they haven't received in four years; or
continue down the path we are on and not go through with a deal, in which case we would lose money.
Councilmember Alevy had been advised the Port would meet and confer with the City conceming any future
proposal to change the land use.
Mr. Salomone explained the Port would notify us if they intended to change the land use, which was different than
a meet and confer provision.
Mayor Pro Tem Moot said for the reasons previously stated, he suggested voting on this resolution because
additional continuances would lead to the same place, and he did not want to lose the offer that was on the table.
MSC (Rindone/Padilla) to direct staff to seek further negntiafions with the Port and specifically to obtain a
meet and confer provision directly to the Port Commission, apprnved 3-1-1 with Moot opposed and Hotton
absent.
17. RESOLUTION 18487 CONCEPTUALLY APPROVING THE TENTATIVE AGREEMENT WITH
SHARP HEALTHCARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF SATISFYING SHARP'S CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS TO THE CITY - Staff has recently concluded negotiations with Sharp Health Care representatives
regarding a tentative agreement to satisfy Sharp's contractual obligations with Chula Vista. The general parameters
of the proposed agreement provides the City with a cash payout at the close of escrow between Sharp/Columbia,
an extension of medical benefits with accruing interest through the year 2008, guarantees regarding Chula Vista
representation on the new non-profit Board and guarantees for Chnla Vista regarding potential "upside" gains related
to the future sale of Sharp's remaining interest in the new entity. Staff recommends Council approve the resolution
and direct staff to return with final contract language. (Assistant City Manager) Continued from the meeting of
11/5/96.
MSC (Moot/Rindone) to continue this item indefinitely, approved 4-0-1 with Hnrton absent.
ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
(None)
OTHER BUSINESS
18. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S)
® Mr. Goss stated the recently adopted Proposition 218 has certain impacts to the City, and staff will analyze the
impacts of the proposition.
· Mr. Goss informed Council that the Building Indnstry Association held a press conference which criticized six
City governments in San Diego County, including Chula Vista, regarding development impact fees. He was also
Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page 8
contacted by the media regarding the press conference. One of the comments was that cities collected development
impact fees, put them in a pot of money, and didn't keep good track of them. The City of Chula Vista has staff
whose sole responsibility is ensuring development fees collected are spent for the appropriate purposes. There was
also implication the fees did more than just support the infrastructure improvements required by new growth. For
a number of years, Chula Vista policy has been that new growth should pay for itself. Taxpayers, as a whole in
this City, should not supplement or subsidize new development in the City, as it should be paid by new
development. Them are development fees tbr park acquisition, transportation, and public facilities which
incorporate a number of issues such as new fire stations, libraries, and any expansion of major infrastructure
necessary because of growth. Our City diverted $4 million for phone upgrades, computer software, etc., but over
half of that money was used for the Geographic Information System. Of the total cost projected in our Capital
Improvement Program for the Geographic lntbrmation System, less than half of the amount was paid for by new
growth, and the remainder came from other established fees in the City. He assured Council that over the past
several years, the City has made sure that new growth paid for itself, and the City has separately tracked those funds
to make sure they were spent appropriately. If there was a question about the formula the City used, staff would
be willing to discuss the matter further with the Building Industry Association.
Councilmember Rindone stated the City's encouragement of growth, jobs and opportunities speak well for this
community. Infrastructure and the necessary public services and amenities for the quality of life expected in Chula
Vista are in place and paid for by the developers prior to construction of new homes.
19. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Pro Tern Moot recognized that a lot of hard work goes into a campaign, and
on behalf of himself and Dennis RowIey, he thanked all of the people for their efforts in working on their
campaigns.
20. COUNCIL COMMENTS
· Councilmember Rindone commended Commander Bob Price, Post 2111 and the various Veterans Associations
for organizing the exemplary Veterans Day cere~nonies recognizing the dedication, hard work and sacrifices of our
veterans.
· Councilmember Rindone stated it was standard practice that Council-elect persons were encouraged to attend
closed sessions on issues involving the City, until they were sworn in. His traderstanding of the Brown Act was
once a person became a Council-elect person, the requirements, provisions and restrictions of the Brown Act applied
to him or her.
Arm Moore, Acting City Attorney, advised against it because what occurs in closed session is considered privileged
as a result of governmental immunities or the attorney-client privilege, and both of those would be jeopardized if
third persons were present.
Mayor Pro Tem Moot suggested the City Attorney's office prepare a written report regarding this issue.
(Councilmember. elect Mary Salas was present and agreed to allow staff time to research the issue.)
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:06 p.m. to a closed session.
Minutes
November 12, 1996
Page 9
CLOSED SESSION
21. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING:
1. Existing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9
· SNMB, L.P. vs.the City of Chula Vista and MCA.
· Cln'istopher vs. the City of Chula Vista.
2. Anticipated litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9
· Metro sewer issues.
· Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) Section 54956.9: 1.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RELEASE - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
® Agency negotiator: John Goss or designee for CVEA, WCE, POA, IAFF, Executive Management,
Mid-Management, and Unrepresented.
Employee organization: Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA) and Western Council of Engineers
(WCE), Police Officers Association (POA) and International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF).
UnrepresenteA/employee: Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unxepresented.
22. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: There were no reportable actions taken in closed
session.
Respectfully submitted,
BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CMC/AAE, City Clerk
Patricia Schwenke, Deputy City Clerk