Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRCC AGENDA PK 2005/06/06Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT NAME: PROJECT LOCATION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: PROJECT APPLICANT: CASE NO.: DATE OF DRAFT DOCUMENT: Optima Car Wash 1450 Third Avenue 623-030-0800 Tanguyen Corporation (Mr. Ha Ta) IS-04-019 May 31, 2005 DATE OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEETING: June 6 2005 DATE OF FINAL DOCUMENT: A. Proiect Settine The 0.96-acre, project site is located at 1450 'T'hird Avenue, the southwest comer of Third Avenue and Orange Avenue (refer to Exhibit A). The irregular-shaped, relatively flat site has been previously graded for the existing full serve gas station and convenience store. The project site contains a 5-% fr. high masonry wall along the west property line between the project site and adjacent apartment complex and parking lots, plus a 6-foot chain link fence along the south property line. A concrete lined storm drain channel lies [o the south of the project site. The majority of the property consists of paved parking lot, fuel pumps and landscaping. Surrounding land uses consist of the following: North - Commercial Retail and small portion of Single-Family Residential East- Commercial Retail South - Commercial Retail West - RV Storage/Sales and Mobile Home Park B. Proiect Description The proposed project consists of remodeling the existing gas station convenience store with partial demolition of the convenience store, to accommodate the proposed drive-thru car wash (Exhibit B). The mechanical carwash and vacuum equipment will be enclosed inside an equipment room, located on the southside of the convenience store. The vacuum hoses will be located on the eastside of the convenience store. Al] air and water pressure hoses as designed along [he north side of [he project site, parallel to Orange Avenue. Proposed improvements include a 14-space paved parking lo[, perimeter and interior landscape treatments, exterior wall lighting and lighting standards, improved perimeter fencing, and drainage improvements. The proposed business hours of operation are proposed from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekends. The proposed project requires a Conditional Use Permit to be considered by the Planning Commission and Design Review of a Precise Plan by the Design Review Committee. 05/31/05 C. Compliance with Zoning and Plans The property is zoned CCP (Central Commercial/Precise Plan) and designated CMO (Retail Commcrcial/Montgomery Specific Plan) under the City's General Plan. Carwashes are permitted uses with a conditional use permit. The proposed use of the site is consistent with the Zoning classification, General Plan designation, Montgomery Specific Plan and the City's adopted environmental plans and policies. D. Identitication of Environmental Effects An Initial Study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including an attached Environmental Checklist form) determined that the proposed project may have potential significant environmental impacts however; mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to reduce these impacts to less than significant level. This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Air Quality Short Term The proposed project will result in a marginal increase in air pollutants during the partial demolition phase (of the convenience store), construction phase of the remodeled convenience store, carwash addition and site improvements. Fugitive dust would be created during these demolition construction activities. Air quality impacts resulting from construction-related operations are considered short-term in duration since construction-related activities are a relatively short-term activity. Dust control measures required during construction operations would be implemented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the County of San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and the California Air Resources Board. The mitigation measures contained in Section F below would mitigate short- lerm construction-related air quality impacts to below a level of significance. Long-Term The project site is located within the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB). The proposed commercial project is consistent with the commercial designation of the project site under the adopted Chula Vista General Plan and Zoning regulations. According to the Traffic Study prepared by Federhart and Associates, the proposed project will generate a minimal amount of traffic trips and result in fewer daily lips from the existing use due to the reduction of the convenience store size. Therefore, project generated traffic would not generate negative air quality impacts. The proposed commercial land use has been included in existing regional air quality projects and plans and will not conflict with or violate any applicable air quality plans or standards. For these reasons, the proposed project would not result in any significant long-term local or regional air quality impacts. Water Quality According to the F,ngineering Department, the entire project site ~s located outside the 500-year floodplain. According to the Sweetwater Authority, the project site is within the service area of their authority. The operation of the proposed carwash is not anticipated to result in a significant increase in the consumption of water otherwise available for public consumption. No changes in the quantity of groundwater, or other impacts, are expected to result from the proposed development of the car wash due to proposed design improvements. Implementation of the project could result in potential silt discharge into the storm drain system. In order to reduce potential water quality impacts, the applicant will be required to prepare and 2 05/31 /OS implement a Construction Storm Water Management Plan (CSWMP). This stormwater plan will be prepared pursuant to the provisions of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region Order No. 2001-01. The proposed car wash area will contain a water reclamation system to conserve water and to avoid the discharge of pollutants generated by the car wash operations into the storm drain system. The reclaimed water would be recirculated and filtered by use of a barrel screen and a separator; pollutants would be removed and properly disposed of by a licensed hauler as described in the Hazards Section below. La accordance with County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health standards and regulations for water reclamation systems, filtered wastewater from this system would be discharged into the City's sanitary sewer system. In accordance with the Municipal code, the SWPPP and NPDES permit requirements, the project will be also be required to implement water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs). Such measures shall be designed to minimize discharge of pollutants into the storm drainage system. Preliminary proposed BMPs include storm drain inlet protection system, source control, protection of stockpiles, protection of slopes, protection of all disturbed areas, protection of access, and perimeter containment measures including landscaped treatments throughout the project site. Construction and post- construction water quality BMPs will also be required as a part of the project grading and improvement plans. 'The City Engineer will ensure that the approved BMPs will be implemented and will be sufficient to treat site runoff prior to exiting the site and entering the public storm drainage system in accordance with the applicable established water quality standards. No impacts to water quality are anticipated. Implementation of a stormwater plan and BMPs will reduce water quality impacts below a level of significance. No significant impacts to the City's storm drainage system are anticipated to result from the proposed development. Teneporary~ Construction Barriers The proposed project may result in a potential for release of construction materials or debris into the adjacent concrete lined channel, during the demolition and construction phase of the project. However, control measures will be required during constmction operations to avoid any dumping of materials and would be implemented to comply with the rules and regulations of the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health and the NPDES permit regulations. This mitigation measure will be included as construction notes on the grading and improvement plans. The mitigation measure contained in Section F below would mitigate short-term construction-related impacts to below a level of significance. Hvdrolos-.v Based upon the review of the project, the Engineering Department has determined that there are no significant issues regarding the drainage of the project site. The existing drainage pattern runs easterly and northeasterly out towards Orange Avenue and Third Avenue. As required, the project drainage improvements include a 1% minimum slope for drainage away from the buildings and the site natural drainage will not be allowed to divert onto adjacent properties or easements. Proposed drainage improvements include trench drains, PVC drains pipes under the sidewalks and fossil filter inlets along the east and north property lines. These minor drainage impruvements will improve the overall on site drainage system and accommodate the proposed project. As a standard condition, a final drainage study will be required in conjunction with the preparation of the project grading plans. In accordance with City standards, post-developed flows shall not exceed pre-developed flows. Properly designed drainage facilities will be installed at the time of site development to the 3 05/31/05 satisfaction of the Ciry Engineer. No significant hydrology impacts are anticipated to result from the proposed project. Hazards/Hazardous Materials lI'ash water/solvents, waste The car wash operations could involve storage and transport of hazardous solvents and materials normally associated with such facilities. The proposed car wash is designed [o include a Reclamation Recovery system; underground containment system for wash water and asand/grease interceptor. The proposed system is athree-compartment system that would not allow contaminants, solvents or wastewater to seep into the ground and discharged into the storm drain system. The proponent will be required to regularly have all sludge, oil and grease that is accumulated in the sand and grease interceptor pumped and hauled away to an approved County of San Diego dump site by a ]icensed oil removal firm, in accordance with the County of San Diego Environmental Health Department standards and regulations. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP) by the City Fire Department and County of San Diego Environmental Health Department. This plan shall identify the type, location, storage and use of any hazardous materials to be used on site. Compliance with local, state and federal environmental regulations and the proposed design of the project would reduce any significant hazardous impacts to a less than significant level through implementation of the mttigation measures contained in Section F below. Lead and Asbestos Removal The potential exists for impacts to result from the partial demolition of convenience store that may contain lead and asbestos. Therefore, during any demolition activities, a licensed and registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor shall perform asbestos and lead-based paint abatement in accordance to all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations, including San Diego County Air Pullution Control District Rule 361.145 -Standard for Demolition and Renovation. The mitigation measure contained in Section P below would mitigate potential impacts associated with the release of asbestos and lead to below a level of significance. Emergency Response Plan/Emergency Evacuation P/an According to the City Police Department and Fire Department, the development of the carwash addition would not interfere with existing emergency response or evacuation plans. The results of the traffic study indicated no significant queuing or truck turning hazards would result from the proposed project. E. Public Comments On April 14, 2005, a Notice of Initial Study was mrculated to property owners within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project site. The notice period ended April 25, 2005. No comments were received during this period. F. Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Impacts Air Ouality 1. The following air quality mitigation requirements shall be shown on all applicable grading, and building plans as details, notes, or as otherwise appropriate, and shall not be deviated 05/31/05 from unless approved in advance in writing by the City's Environmental Review Coordinator • Minimize simultaneous operation of multiple construction equipment units. • Use low pollutant-emitting construction equipment. • Use electrical construction equipment as practical. • Use catalytic reduction for gasoline-powered equipment. • Use injection-timing retard for diesel-powered equipment. • Water the construction area twice daily to minimize fugitive dust. • Stabilize graded areas as quickly as possible to minimize fugitive dust. • Pave permanent roads as quickly as possible to minimize dust. • Use electricity from power poles instead of temporary generators during building, if available. • Apply stabilizer or pave the last 100 feet of internal travel path within a construction site prior to public road entry. • Install wheel washers adjacent to a paved apron prior to vehicle entry on public roads. • Remove any visible track-out into traveled public streets within 30 minutes of occurrence. • Wet wash the construction access point at the end of each workday if any vehicle travel on unpaved surfaces has occurred. • Provide sufficient perimeter erosion control to prevent washout of silty material onto public roads. • Cover haul trucks or maintain at least 12 inches of freeboard to reduce blow-off during hauling. • Suspend all soil disturbance and travel on unpaved surfaces if winds exceed 25 miles per hour. Water Quality/Hydrology 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer shall verify that the final grading plans comply with the provisions of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region Order No. 2001-01 with respect to construction-related water quality best management practices. 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer shall verify that the grading or construction plans comply with the provisions of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region Order No. 2001-O1 with respect to permanent, post-construction water quality best management practices (BMPs). If one or more of the approved post-construction BMPs isnon-structural, then apost-constructton BMP plan shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer pnor to the commencement of construction; compliance with said plan shall become a permanent requirement of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 4. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, temporary desdting and erosion control devices shall be installed. Protective devices will be provided at every storm drain inlet to prevent sediment from entering the storm drain system. These measures shall be reflected in the grading and improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. Orange biology fencing shall be installed along the southern property line [o avoid demolition or construction debris from entering the concreted lined channel. The fencing shall be installed prior to commencement of demolition of the convenience store and development activities and verified by the City Mitigation Monitor. This measure shall be reflected in the grading and 5 05/31/05 improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Environmental Review Coordinator. Hazards/Hazardous Materials 1n accordance with the County of San Diego Environmental Health standards, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program the applicant shall retain a licensed oil removal firm to regularly haul all sludge, oil and grease that is accumulated in the sand and grease interceptor pumped and hauled away to an approved County of San Diego dump site. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP) by the City Fire Department and County of San Diego Environmental Health Department. This plan shall identify the type, location, storage and use of any hazardous materials to be used on site. 8. During any demolition activities, a licensed and registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor shall perform asbestos and lead-based paint abatement in accordance [o all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations, including San Dicgo County Air Pollution Control District Rule 361.145 -Standard for Demolition and Renovation. G. Consultation 1. Individuals and Organizations City of Chula Vista Maria C. Muett, Planning and Building Marisa Lundstedt, Planning and Building Lynnette Tessitore-Lopez, Planning and Building Sohaib Al-Agha, Engineering Frank Rivera, Engineering Sylvester Evetovich, Engineering David Kaplan, Engineering Beth Chopp, Engineering Richard Preuss, Police Department Applicant: Mr. Ha Ta Other Agencies: Sweetwater Authority 2. Documents Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989) Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code Acuusticul Armlysis Report/Optima Cur Nash, prepared by Eilar Associates, and dated April 19. 2005 05/31 /OS 7ra~c Study for Optima Cur [Push, prepared by Federhart & Associates and dated March 21, 2005 Soil Im~estigation/Optima Car Wash, prepared by Allied Earth Technology and dated November 11, 2003 3. Initial Studv This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study and comments received in response to Notice of Initial Study. The report reflects the independentjudgement of [he City of Chula Vista. Further information regarding the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning and Building Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910. Marilyn R. F. Ponseggi Environmental Review Coordinator J `,Planning\MARIAVnilial Study\11-04 019MND.doc Date: OS/31/OS S~ ~ PARK ~ COQ- PALOMAR RETAIL APARTMENTS <G CENTER G~ QUINTAR US ~' N QV\Nj PRO 5~ CASA A ARTMENT OFiENO KRAGEN MADRID MO AUTO ~ APARTMENTS VISTA CASTLE LANE RETAIL ARMS APARTMENTS APARTMENTS ORANG ,...._„_,_ ORANGE AV PLAZA TH ORANGE CHULAVISTA GLEN _ _ RY APARTMENTS FABULOUS CALIENTE ~ C"~ MOBILE HOME ^ _~ _ PARK ~ ~~ ^ pR01ECT - ~ _ < o o ~ LOCAT_ ION _ ~LY WN OOD ~ ~ °B~ y MOBILE HOME ~ ~ PARK _ ~~ C It'~~ i ^~ ~ i - ~ - _ __ _ e_o o, ANITA ST ~ ~ j CATHOLIC '__L~ CHURCH ' MONTGOMERY - TREMONT_ST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I MONTGOMER 1 ~-1-I-1~ I ITT ~ f CHULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR PROJECT OPTIMA CAR WASH PROJECT DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: INITIAL STUDY PROJECT 1450 THIRD AVENUE ADDRESS. Request: Proposing to demolish and remodel portion of existing gas/retail convenient store and build a new 1,006sgft car wash. SCALE. FILE NUMBER: NORTH No Scale IS-04-19 Related Case(s): DRC-04-38,PCC-04-035 j:\cherylc\locators\Iocalors04\is04019.cdr 01.29.04 Exhibit A cW.1=d 0 A ~ A ~ ~ A IIYIY 'a'J 'alsln a'lM7 on vo o~wi rlw uv~ ~.mi. e.. S ~< ~ 1 20W il fi iflNina GMIHl OSbI ~c g ~J °amol~ € 1®d~d I HStlM atl~ tlWlldO I d. .,...,.o....,,w...._. ~, ~.I ~g' I~k I ~ t S1d30N00 ONIOllf18 03~NnIlOtl { , , ~ s5 f 9g ak 4 ~ i k ~ i °' RR ~ ~ ~. £ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a k ~ ~~ a 4 ~s s ~ ~< ~ ~ ~If zOOO©OOO t ~ x ~_~ a ~ z E~ ~zs ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 3 ~ 3~ f f33 31 3k 1 ~ 1 Eg _ E :€: :~ 5 ~ ,y 3 ~ If 3 161 ~ S. ~~ 7~t~ 3f1N3nH Q2{IHl 4 ,. I'N ~ . ~ z .~ .-,. ~ ~ o,,, :~ t s ~ ~ ~s ~~ ~ 11II'' I ~~31 ~3 ?' ~~ ~ 1i ~ 4 ~ UI ~Y ~ ~Y ~YC'~~J ~ 3 ~d~ o ~ 1 ® ~ B6D~ B _ - ,-,nn Q ®. 3 ,... A UI ' .e 8- ;a ~~ §~~ ~ ~~~ ~ Q 01 ~ ~~ I BBB B (~ .o-pl , NIA a iLLYYL 0 O ? o- t 0 I~ 3~3 ~ ...o~ 0. ~ N o nu- ~ i e, 1~ i r w d R N C E E 0 U a ~' a ~ o ~ a N E ~ Q ' U 'c d a cc C N T T ~ om U°'~ as ~' m ~ r O O i~ c n D! 6 a ¢ W D z o0 H aU X ~ O C a ,: C N a ~° so LLJ W U OV X ~ . w E N ~ ~ N `o Z j n V X a c~ Z F _ O w ^ N Z O ~ N O U U O L ;~ C N O L N ~ m U ~ ~ ~ Q m w F a_c Q ~ n 2' o`_ o c - N ~ ~ ~Oj . ~ 0 [0 U n U c > N ~ t ~ d ~ E g 0 . E a c -° i a ~ w m ~ n m ° ~ ~E a a m c o ° n 5 ° v n m ~ v " m j O m d N y N 3 O N O O N n O` ~ "O 3 (0 N O N N D 0 0 N L y d . . m E C o c O n 6 ~ T ~ 6 n N d d d n t0 N~ G O o O O o~ N N ~ ~ E Qan `o ~ °~ ~ m ~ ~ w w m o ~ ° n m c m c no o c N t > d m~ ~ N d a o c b n - ao ~ m >. >, rv 'O oN o ... o g m m o a ~ m ~ m m 1O ° ~ ~ °w ° = u m~ .Jo y ~ ~ ` oNn ~ oa ~ A ~ n ° m m ~ N o ~ m g ~ ~ ~ o .~ ~ ~ ~, °m ~ o ~ ~ m o ~ !0 C y N= U 0) c0 O' O' d ~- ry U ~ O O ~ c ~ O U~ ~ o U ~ o ~ ` m Uc « - O C N ~ c ~ m~ ~ V ~ m m Q N pU O ~m d 4L U a~ 3 mn N 0 N E Q! N C N ~ J C O ~ C O N N N ~ O 6' ~ C O D N {` « C N O N E 1° ~ N 0~ E L O U •• T N L - O f E v v m .v N ° j a t0 n Q m m ~- T ~ o o y x ~ ono o cn m . c O c ' ~-o o E m o L c DE cc o nm U v ~ c~vi Q_ (0 mo U c VO o U -o N E _ N -Om U C ~~ c 'L mo N " N O o'`o U .- U ~E y i y x o U O~ D n~ ' ~y ? c V ~ d ~~ m•= 3 Z > o d oc y E~o Ec ~ v a o.: m o~ ~~ ~ D ~3 ~c >.c £mw ~'m .3 ..O H o~ _ w y o °a ~ = c c w~ or w E o ` ~ n« v o m 5 s t o 0 9 m .. J ~ N 3 N ~ d O « N Q N~ 6 3 U j 3 N O N ~ L p D v 3 0 ` ~ . O N N C N L 3 0 ( C ° ~ i ~ c m a~ m a m a °~ '' D E m E an d ~' d~ m a i E m L N S t m n o. ~ d v o 3 ~ c ~ ° w w NO ° y~ m ~.m ~ yoc me Nc a>~ ° o ;~> c vm vUC 0 o~ >oo ~t i ~ a~o ~ u > > > i ~ ~ tnE o. E 7rn ¢~ o ~w iy ~ a a 3 U~tn v i Q F ya . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c o oz ~. m m ~ ~ N i.. O d 0. d IC {'~ Chi'; o, at m c rn c m c c E c C C C _O D C O C N N a m m _T D_ U ~' C~ C _T d U~ C C C _T U~ C C C D.O U D C _T .O U D C .~ ~- UJ ~ N ~ E ~ E 7 ~` m -~ m E ~~ E ? .` m 'O m ~ E ~~ E A m ~ ~' E - ~ N °' E ~ ~ - C~ m ry ~ ~ - C~ m ~`p ~ - C~ m ry Y C~ ~ - C~ ¢'om nD n n'm n-o n ° c o.'rn nD n ° ` n c n nao n c n °ao awo mo wo mo a a w o 00 ¢ ¢ a~ x x a~ x w.; 'm« c ~ :c 30 x x x x - 30 OV 6V d o X X X X 6 0 U U ~ ~ F- f N N m in (~ Ul Y U C N p C L O U C L p U ~ U ~ U ~ c n N N c n N N c¢ N N a ~ a s a ~ £ T V n= 3 ° m ~ O C C O O C m N« N O O cm~ C ~ 'O C N c ~n _0 L O F' C L - 9 N Ego ` C om~ Na oS 0 ~, m.o~m~ ° U C 2F•-d ~ rn o crmmo y°p= V=. rnO ter: ~n3t a L m dU m~°E W Vy_°E c oN~NT U cd°d N n CJ 2K co°a ` '01 'o N C ~~ ~ a` °oc5 voo = rn~c c E N .- o,~°pr53 . N IO ~n 6~ > p~ « C N N ycEm'^mm mSm~E m O N ._..- « En NDO m C O o m~~~cU .: U O N o'-' >~._ '-Z~ -m ~ v ' .°U O~o-w onmO"E ~ . ` ~ ~4i£7mio . oc~c'aorn5 ° ~ o ° E °~a~~`-p °ao °-'m £ m L 'm E o co v m V o m~ ~ E W. $~ d U i U E w m m~ ( C ` - m m o~ o o ° ° o= E v}a!. o m m ._ norm0 ~' ._ m ~ 2 m ~- a~o0 m'~mcU~dc O d w v N o. ~+Dmd« = m m L ~Ev~d~moS a.. N c`oEg ~°c~ } O) m a p 3 ~ (0 N N € n p Cp O L ~«~ m> N C D c0 C D 'p «~ O~ T N U~ W. O N~ Up~~ U ~ C C p ._ a OlD C C N N C U U« U C p 7 COI p N- N > N a N p« N«~ A O 1]"O O }~.. D O D O) E T ~m O J w~` " O_ nm `w m „ N y D S ~ ` NU w C ~ C O C U _ ~ " °' O L O S jp O)..w ~~ E O N C N l0 K L O)«>t0 N6COC n O N O Olh «NO N (0 N LmOpyLpN3 O ~ . (n D d m E Oc >~]O 0" N jp N Oi ~ O l0 ~~ O U~ D O'- O€ O n m Y ry m C n~ d ~ p'C T 0 O N N O ~ U 10 O) O t n C N m } _ O V N C N o ~ p L O d N d C d o o ~ E O - N m C 3 > L N.L. N ~ N .L. ~ d O N L N N p ° ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~' C N C . c~ •2`.L m a ~ m c b N d d O N S 6 O v o a ao n p N N E C y° c- m w~ d T.i C I'-_' m C R0 ~ n- ~ o t m .. m~ O N ` ~ ~ ~-' ~ N .~_. ~ ~> o N ~ ° _ L N l0 m >> U -' m m m E E 3 N o Y .. m m >, m~ t ao n m° ~ > 5. « m~ 3 = D ~ ° - ~ "- "~o c " N L> 0 C N= >,3a ma~~ u°o ~ ~ C N N L T- ~- T ym~ c NE D " > N an~ ~, =°E O ~ C C O = mm cN°c C t0 C N O ~ t U m N~ 0 O t mgm , ` N N 6 m 0 ~- O N 1] ~ ~ m Emo ~ o ' O L N N N~ H O ~ C L N O n E L C N N N O E. a oNO to 'O C N N Qi U- yOj U aEc_om'o W ~~ S d t o o w o ~ ~ d p ° N° o Q ~ o w m o,~¢ n ~ m o E E~ ° E Ny m- m~ i ~ m m ~ o Q o m~ d d h c mN o~ c CNdN~OUmU °~°~ E n . N"N-C ° ~ N CS' O._NOW ~ ~ U~.-CO1 O1O ° ~ ~ Q 3 °'Say m a`w 3U E L m-- cm -mom a`w n~Z3omn«n~ m °c>.D c d-Nd. wmw 1°od ~dN~ED OND.~omE._m S ° ccO ami w~ wmm N [~l O 1!> c0 rl 0. r m F- m m m ~~ m ~a () ~ ~ U ~ c m c rn~ c wE V C ~ ~' ~ ~ C a n C C p o n!a m ~ a_ m aao aao d U ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ v c N y E m c`q (° ani5a o ~a~° om _ ° m ^ n~4 °' am mL c Na O m c m ~9LLNNN NOU1-~,9 ~ i C= N N U~ N C N ovc `'3-I~E'r vEr ~pca a~iU 34 E ~ .. o N ~ c 3 o m~ o o, o T'> 9 ~ ai ° c °c y ~ a ~_ '~ -~ m~ ~ a a m a W m~ ~> E a m es U O~ O N L U ry m~ (n eD Qt N N ~ N S ~ a N O m a V C N O d C C N O " o a 0'0 ~ > N N O N N- 7~ O N (9 L N d 41 d V ~- ~ ~~ 2 o F- ~ d D .o n c U O y ~ UI ~`C 9 T10 N_ N N Vi C E C N (J ~' N N n ~^ ~ _y0 m~ 0 E m N ~ N VvOi 10 N _~ K p 9 ~ O N ~ v-~- t0 m~9 C 2 ~- N O p d m~ m ~ N o ~ m m~~ U m n ~~ n P C T 'J Q 5 6 L G c n a M v a ATTACHMENT "A" MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) Optima Canvash - IS-04-019 This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared by the City of Chula Vista in conjunction with the proposed Optima Carwash. The proposed project has been evaluated in an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City/State CEQA Guidelines (IS-04-019). The ]egislation requires public agencies to ensure that adequate mitigation measures are implemented and monitored for Mitigated Negative Declarations. AB 3180 requires monitoring of potentially significant and/or significant environmental impacts. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for this project ensures adequate implementation of mitigation for the following potential impacts(s): 1. Air Quality 2. Water Quality/Hydrology 3. Hazards/Hazardous Materials MONITORING PROGRAM Due to the nature of the environmental issues identified, the Mitigation Compliance Coordinators shall be the Environmental Review Coordinator and City Engineer of the City of Chula Vista. The applicant shall be responsible to ensure that the conditions of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are met to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator and City Engineer. The applicant shall provide evidence in written form confirming compliance with the mitigation measures specified in Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-04-019 to the Environmental Review Coordinator and City Engineer. The Environmental Review Coordinator and City Engineer will thus provide the ultimate verification that the mitigation measures have been accomplished. Table 1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist, lists the mitigation measures contained in Section F, Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Effects, of Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-04-019, which will be implemented as part of the project. In order to determine if the applicant has implemented the measure, the method and timing of verification are identified, along with the City department or agency responsible for monitoring/verifying that the applicant has completed each mitigation measure. Space for the signature of the verifying person and the date of inspection is provided in the last column. J-Nlanning\MARIAUnitial Stndy\IS-04-019MMRPtest doc ~~lr, _.w.. cm a ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CHUTA v15TA 1. Name of Proponent: 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: 3. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 4. Name of Proposal: 5. Date of Checklist: 6. Case No. Mr. Ha Ta Tan Guyen Corporation City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 1450 Third Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91911 (619)585-0011 Optima Car Wash May 31, 2005 IS-04-019 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS QUESTIONS: ISSUES: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporates Impact I. AF,STHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, tress, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ~ 1 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than IssUe$: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact in the area? Comments• a-b) No scenic resources vistas exist on or near the project site. c) The developed site is located within an established, developed commercial and limited residential area. The proposed project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the project site since the proposed carwash will blend in with the existing architectural design and building height of the gas station/convenience store and not alter any existing viewsheds to the surrounding land uses. The proposed structure will be located within the existing building area along the southern and western portions of the project site. The project site is slated for development according to the General Plan Land Use and MSCP Subarea Plan. d) The project will be required to comply with the light and glare regulations (Section 19.66.100) of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC). Compliance with these regulations will ensure that no substantia] glare, or light shall affect daytime or nighttime views in the surrounding area. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ^ ^ ^ ^ Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Familand Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, tonon-agricultural use'? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or ^ ^ ^ ^ a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ^ ^ ^ ^ which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Issues: Comments: less Than Significant I'oten[ially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact a-c) The project site is neither in current agricultural production, nor adjacent to a parcel in agricu]tural production. The site does not contain any agricultural resources or designated fatittland. No impacts to agricultural resources are anticipated. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required. III. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ^ ^ ^ applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ^ ^ ^ substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net ^ ^ ^ increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursor,)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ^ ~ ^ conu;ntrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ^ ^ number of people`? ^ ^ C ^ 3 Issues Comments: (a-e) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E. Miti2a6on• Less Than Signincant Potentially with Less Than Signincant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact The mitigation measures contained in Section F of the Mitigated Negative Declaration would mitigate potentially significant short-term construction-related air quality impacts to level of less than significance. N. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ^ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ^ habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ^ protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? 4 Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially Wi[h Significant Mitigation Impact Incorpora[eJ d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any ^ native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Comments• Less Than Significant No Impact Impact i~ a) No endangered or sensitive species, species of concern or species that are candidates for listing are present within or immediately adjacent to the developed project area_ b) No locally riparian habitat or other natural sensitive communities are present within or immediately adjacent to the developed project area. c) No wetland habitatispresent within orimmediately adjacent to the developed project area. d) No wildlife dispersal or migration corridors exist within or immediately adjacent to the developed project area. e) No impacts to local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources are anticipated with the project development. f) No impacts to regional habitat preservation planning efforts will be created, as the development site is a designated development area in the adopted Chula Vista Multiple Species Conservation Program Subarea Plan. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than tSSUCS: Significant Mifigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ^ ^ ^ ~ of a historical resource as defined in State CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ^ ^ ^ ~ of an archaeological resource pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ^ ^ ^ ~ resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ^ ^ ^ ~ outside of formal cemeteries? Comments• a) No historic resources are known or are expected to be present within the project impact area. Therefore, no substantial adverse change in the significance of a histonca] resource as defined in Section 15064.5 is antictpated. b) No historic buildings or structures are present within the previously disturbed project site and no prehistoric or historic objects are known. Therefore, the potential for adverse changes to archaeological resource as defined in Section 15064.5 is not anticipated. c) Based nn the level of previous disturbance to the site and the relatively limited disturbance for the proposed project, the potential to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature is not anticipated. d) No human remains are anticipated to be present within the impact area of the project. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Wou]d the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or G Issues: Less Than Signincan[ Potentially with Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated tmpact death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated ^ on the most recent Alquist-F'riolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? ^ iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ^ iv. Landslides? ^ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ^ topsoil'? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ^ or [hat would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Bc located on expansive soil, creating substantial ^ risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the ^ use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ 7 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than ISSneS: Significant Mitigation Signincant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Cnmment$' a-e) The project site has been previously disturbed with the construction of the existing gas station and convenience store, storm water drain pipes and site improvements. The preparation and submittal of a final soils report will be required prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the proposed project as a standard engineering requirement. According to the Engineering Department, there are no known or suspected seismic hazards associated with the project site. The site is not within a mapped Earthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, project compliance with applicable Uniform Building Code standards would adequately address any building safety/seismic concerns. Erosion control measures would be identified in conjunction with the preparation of final grading plans and would be implemented during construction. The implementation of appropriate water quality best management practices (BMPs) during construction would be required in accordance with the Chula Vista Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP). All portions of the development area disturbed during construction would either be developed or would be appropriately landscaped in compliance with the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Sections 19.36.090 and 19.36.110. Compliance with SUSMP requirements would be ensured by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits for the proposed project. Compliance with the City and regional standards would lessen any potenhal impact to less than significant. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ^ ~ ^ ^ environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ^ ^ ^ ~ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ^ ^ ^ ~ acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ^ ^ ^ ~ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5 and, as a result, S Issues: would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Less Than Signincan[ Potentially With Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ^ or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? {) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ^ would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere ^ with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ^ loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a-h) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E. Less Than Significant Impact ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Miti>?ation: The mitigation measures contained in Section F of the Mitigated Negative Declaration would mitigate potentially significant hazards/hazardous materials impacts to level of less than significance. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Result in an increase in pollutant discharges to ^ receiving waters (including impaired water bodies pursuant to the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list), result in significant alteration of receiving water quality during or following construction, or violate any ~ ^ No Impact c~