The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRCC AGENDA PK 2006/01/09Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT NAME: PROJECT LOCATION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO PROJECT APPLICANT: St. Pius X Catholic Church 1120 Cuyamaca Avenue Chula Vista, CA 575-450-2600 & 575-450-2700 Catholic Diocese of San Diego DATE OF DRAFT DOCUMENT: December 15, 2005 DATE OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEETING: January 9, 2006 DATE OF FINAL DOCUMENT: PREPARED BY: Mary Venables, Associate Planner A. Project Setting The project site consists of an approximately 5.18 acre area located on the west side of Cuyamaca Avenue between E. Naples Street and E. Emerson Street. The site is situated in an urbanized area in the western portion of the City of Chula Vista (See Exhibi[ A -Location Map). The project site is developed with the existing St. Pius X Catholic Church, rectory, school, parish offices, meeting hall and workshop/storage buildings. Land uses surrounding the project site consist of the following: North: Single-family residences and neighborhood retail center South: Single-family residences East: Single-family residences West: Single-family residences and elementary school B. Proiect Description The project proposes a master plan to develop and expand the existing church/school site in phases to meet the projected needs of the parish community. (See Exhibit B -Site Plan). The proposal includes the following major improvements: • Church A 10,648 square foot addition to accommodate 852 people and renovation of the existing structure including a re-orientation of the church toward the parking area and new entry on the south elevation. • Parish Hall The existing 5,620 square foot Hall and workshop/storage buildings to be demolished. A new 12,150 square foot Parish Hall to be constructed south of the existing rectory to be used for parish and school activities. • Parish Offices The existing administrative offices to be renovated and a 12,364 square foot two-story addition to be attached to the existing structure. The first floor of the new structure is proposed to contain meeting rooms, offices and a library with additional meeting rooms on the second floor. • School Improvements to the school facilities include renovation of the sports office and equipment storage, addition of meeting and specialized learning rooms, and a 6,536 square foot multi-purpose building with kitchenette, teacher's lounge and an after-school day care office. No increase in student population is proposed. • Miscellaneous Improvements The Church, Parish Mall and Parish Offices to surround a new central plaza area with a covered arcade. In addition, a new roof parapet to screen the existing roof mounted mechanical equipment and a new driveway access to the existing Pastor's residence (Rectory) are proposed. The proposal also includes site improvements for parking facilities, new lighting and landscaping. • Hours of Operation Elementary School (K-8) The current hours of operation for the existing school activities are 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. No changes to the existing hours of operation or changes to the current enrollment are proposed. Church/Pm~ish Activities The hours of operation for existing church services and related parish activities is 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday and 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Sunday. No changes to the current hours of operation are proposed. The multi-phase development is outlined below: Phase la: January 2006. Demolish the existing parish hall, accessory buildings and a portion of the existing paving and fencing. Phase ]b: February 2006. Construct new boundary walls and fencing, parking lot, site utilities and drainage improvements. Phase lc: April 2006. Construct new Parish Hall, meeting room building, social plaza with covered arcade and associated landscaping. Phase 2a June 2009. Demolish a portion of the church, preparation for new construction. Phase 2b July 2009. Construct church addition. Phase 2c March 2010. Conduct site work, including retaining walls and landscape associated with remodeled church building. Phase 3 February 2014. Construct new multi-purpose building. Renovate and construct additions to the school facilities. C. Compliance with Zoning and Plans The site is located in the RI (Single-Family Residential) Zone and RLM (Low-Medium Density Residential) General Plan land use designation. The project is consistent with the applicable zoning regulations and the Chula Vista General Plan. The project requires the approval of Design Review by the Design Review Committee and a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. D. Public Comments On August 16, 2005, a Notice of Initial Study was circulated to property owners and residents within 500-foot radius of the proposed project site. The public comment period ended August 26, 2005. Staff received one verbal communication regarding whether or not the proposed project would extend beyond the current property boundaries and requesting a clarification of the design of the project. These issues have been addressed in the attached Initial Study Checklist and the technical studies noted below. E. Identii3cation of Environmental Effects An Initial Study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including the attached Environmental Checklist form) determined that the proposed project may have potential significant environmental impacts however; revisions to the project have been made or mitigation measures have been agreed to by the project proponent to reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Air ualit Short-Term hnpaets The proposed project will result in a minor increase in air pollutants during the demolition and construction phases of the project. Fugitive dust would be created during demolition, grading and construction activities. Air quality impacts resulting from construction-related operations are considered short-term in duration since construction-related activities are temporary. Dust control measures required during construction operations would be implemented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the County of San Diego Air 3 Pollution Control District (APCD) and the California Air Resources Board. The mitigation measures contained in Section F below would mitigate short-term construction-related air quality impacts to below a level of significance. Long-Term Impacts The project site is located within the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB). According to the Traffic Study prepared by Darnell & Associates, Inc., weekday traffic generated by the proposed expansion would be minimal, resulting in 57 new daily traffic trips. Two (2) of the new trips occur during the morning peak hour and four (4) during the evening peak hour. The project does not propose additional school activities or increases in the student population that would increase peak hour traffic. Therefore, project generated traffic would not be significant or result in adverse air quality impacts. The church/school land use has been included in existing regional air quality projects and plans and does not conflict with or violate any applicable air quality plans or standards. For these reasons, the proposed project would not result in any significant long-term local or regional air quality impacts. Cultural Resources The proposed project involves partial remodeling of the existing St. Pius X Catholic Church complex. final Historic Architectural Survey Report (HASR) and Findings of Effect Report (FOE), Calvin & Associates, August 2005 evaluated the project for historical significance using criteria outlined in Public Resource Code 5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4852, California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). "The proposed changes to the St. Pius X Catholic Church complex include alterations or demolition of the main church and rectory, the parish hall, offices and school. The main church and rectory were constructed in 1955 and aze representative of a Modern interpretation of the Mission Revival style. The HASR and FOE identified these two buildings as a historic architectural resource that meets Criterion 3 of the CRHR for cmbodying the distinctive chazacteristics of a type and period of construction. CF.QA defines a historic resource as a resource that is listed or could potentially be listed in a local historic resources register whether it has been listed or not. The main church and rectory are eligible for historic designation on the Chula Vista List of Historic Sites under Criterion 3 of the CR11R for embodying the distinctive characteristics of a type and period of construction. The HASR and FOE assessed the impacts of the proposal and determined that the renovation and expansion of the St. Pius X Catholic Church complex are considered significant and would cause a substantial adverse change on a historic architectural resource. Mitigation measures to reduce the impacts to cultural resources to a level below significance as recommended in the HASR and FOE are proposed in Section F of this Mitigated Negative Declaration. Because the project involves a remodel of the church as opposed to demolition, mitigation measures documenting the existing church building and its relationship to the complex before, during and after construction through a photographic representation has been determined to be adequate mitigation. 4 Geology and Soils To assess the potential geological and soils impacts of the project, Preliminary Geotechnical Ir:vestigation Proposed Improvements to Saint Pius Church, 1120 Cuyamaca Avenue, Chula Vista, California, January 17, 2003, was prepared by Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. The results of this analysis are summarized below. The project site is not located within a mapped Earthquake Fault Zone. In addition, no known significant or suspected seismic hazards associated with the project site are identified. According to the geologic study, the main issues that affect the proposed project deal with the existence of unsuitable surface materials and moderately expansive soil. The submittal of a final soils report is required prior to issuance of grading and construction permits to determine final soil conditions and compliance with foundation and pavement recommendations. In addition, erosion control measures would be identified in conjunction with the preparation of final grading plans and would be implemented during construction. The impacts to geology and soils would be reduced to a level below significance provided compliance with the recommendations and measwes identified in the preliminary geotechnical report are incorporated into the project design and final grading plan. Please refer to Section F of this Mitigated Negative Declaration. I Iazards/Hazardous Materials /.ead and Asfiestos Removal The existing structures proposed to be demolished/renovated potentially contain asbestos and lead-based paint. Therefore, prior to any demolition activities the presence of asbestos and lead-based paint will be determined and if present, abatement shall be performed by licensed, registered asbestos and lead abatement contractors in accordance with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations, including San Diego County Air Pollution Control District Rule 361.145, Standard for Demolition and Renovation. The mitigation measure contained in Section F below would mitigate potential hazards/hazardous material impacts associated with the release of asbestos and lead to below a level of significance. Hydrology and Water Quality Based upon review of the project, the Engineering Department has determined that there are no significant issues or impacts regarding the proposed drainage improvements for the project site. The project proposes the installation of a storm drain filter system, culvert, backflow preventer, 3-inch PVC drainpipe, 6-inch PVC catch basin and inlets and placement of appropriate gravel bags or dikes. As required, the proposed drainage must be directed away from buildings and adjacent properties. As a standard condition, a final drainage study will be required in conjunction with the preparation of the project grading plans and must demonstrate that the post- development peak flow rate does not exceed the pre-development flows. The drainage improvements as proposed would improve the overall on-site drainage system and accommodate the proposed project The drainage facilities shall be installed at the time of the site development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. No significant impacts to the City s storm drainage system are anticipated to result from the proposed project. 5 In addition, compliance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations including the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Monitoring Program Plan would be required. The implementation of water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) would be required in accordance the NPDES General Permit. Based upon the implementation of standard engineering requirements and compliance with requirements of the SWPPP and BMPs, water quality impacts would be reduced to below a level of significance. See Section F of this Mitigated Negative Declazation. Noise To assess the potential noise impacts of the proposed project, a noise study was prepared by DUDEK & Associates, Inc., entitled Saint Pius X Church Expansion Project - Environmental Noise Assessment, dated September 1, 2005. The noise assessment analyzed the project with respect to the regulations contained in Chapter 19.68, Performance Standazds and Noise Control, of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (noise control ordinance). Noise associated with the project proposal would include short-term construction noise, student noise at outdoor playground area, noise from vehicles in the pazking lot, outdoor mechanical equipment and traffic noise on adjacent streets. Construction Noire Pursuant to Section 17.24.050(J) of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, construction work in residential zones that generates noise disturbing to persons residing or working in the vicinity is not permitted between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday and between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Saturday and Sunday, except when necessary for emergency repairs required for the health and safety of any member of the community. Due to the presence of residential development in the surrounding area, this provision of the Municipal Code applies to the project and would ensure that residents would not be disturbed by construction noise during the most noise sensitive periods of the day. Outdoor Plcryground Activity Noise The project does not propose to increase student enrollment and improvements to the school facilities would not alter outdoor activities associated with the school. Noise from the playground area is anticipated to remain unchanged thus having a less than significant impact. Parking I,ot Noise The proposed project contains parking facilities for 243 vehicles including the construction of new parking spaces along the western perimeter of the site adjacent to existing single- family residences. "The analysis concluded that the noise level would exceed the City's noise regulations during the nighttime hours (weekdays - 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., weekends 10:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.). The noise impacts associated with the parking lot are considered significant and mitigation measures are proposed in Section F below. 6 Outdoor Mechanical Equipment Noise Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVACj equipment is proposed to be located on the roofs of the structures. The noise generated by the machinery would vary depending on the type and size of the mechanical equipment. Based on the preliminary plans and mechanical equipment list, the noise assessment concluded that noise generated from the HVAC would exceed the City's noise standards. Noise impacts related to the outdoor mechanical equipment are considered significant. The mitigation proposed in Section F of this Mitigated Negative Declaration must be implemented in order for impacts to be reduced to below a level of significance. Traff:e Noise The projected traffic noise impacts associated with increased traffic volumes along East Naples Street, Cuyamaca Avenue and Emerson Street and at the project site were assessed in the noise analysis. The report concluded that the minimal increase in traffic volume would have a less than significant impact on noise. Tran sportati on/Traffi c To identity potential traffic impacts associated with the development of the project, Traffic Impact Analvsis~or Proposed St. Pius X Church Expansion, January 14, 2004, was prepared by Darnell & Associates Inc. The project does not propose additional school activities or an increase in student population therefore no increase in weekday pear hour traffic is anticipated. The proposed church expansion is projected to generate approximately 57 new average daily trips (ADTs). The new ADTs include one (1) inbound outbound trip projected to occur during the morning peak hour and 2 inbound/outbound trips to occur during the evening peak hour. The nearby intersections of Naples/Hilltop, Naples/Cuyamaca, Emerson/Hilltop and Emerson/Cuyamaca currently operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) B or better. The existing roadway segments that were studied included Naples between Hilltop and Cuyamaca, Emerson between hilltop and Cuyamaca and Cuyamaca between Naples and Emerson, all operating at LOS A. The traffic impact analysis demonstrated that the intersections and street segments operate at acceptable levels with or without the proposed project. In addition the proposal would have no significant peak hour impacts to intersections or on nearby roadway segments. The project currently has adequate access from Cuyamaca Avenue and Naples Street. Internal circulation would be improved as a result of the proposed building configuration and the parking lot layout. The access does not generate significant new traffic onto local streets due to the church expansion. No significant traffic impacts will result from the proposed church expansion project. Parking The project proposes the addition of 67 new parking spaces resulting in a total of 243 parking spaces to accommodate the church and school facilities. The project applicant has submitted a seating chart and parking analysis for the proposed sanctuary/auditorium that establishes a 7 seating capacity of 852 within the expanded facility. Based on the proposed seating capacity a minimum of 243 parking spaces must be provided in accordance with the Chula Vista Municipal Code. The analysis concluded that the 243 parking spaces as shown on the proposed site plan would meet the on-site parking ratio and no additional parking would be necessary. No significant parking impacts will result from the proposed project. F. Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Impacts Air Ouality The following air quality mitigation measures implemented during grading and construction: a) Minimize simultaneous operation of multiple construction equipment units b) Use low pollutant-emitting construction equipment c) Use electrical construction equipment as practical d) Use catalytic reduction for gasoline-powered equipment e) Use injection timing retard for diesel-powered equipment f) Water the construction area twice daily to minimize fugitive dust g) Stabilize graded areas as quickly as possible to minimize fugitive dust h) Pave permanent roads a quickly as possible to minimize dust i) Use electricity from power poles instead of temporary generators during building, if available j) Apply chemical stabilizer or pave the last 100 feet of internal travel path within a construction site prior to public road entry k) Install wheel washers adjacent to a paved apron prior to vehicle entry on public roads 1) Remove any visible track-out into traveled public streets within 30 minutes of occur-epee m) Wet wash the construction access point at the end of each workday if any vehicle travel on unpaved surfaces has occurred n) Provide sufficient perimeter erosion control to prevent washout of silty material onto public roads o) Cover haul trucks or maintain at least 12 inches of freeboard to reduce blow-off during hauling p) Suspend all soil disturbance and travel on unpaved surfaces if winds exceed 25 miles per hour The air quality mitigation measures shall be shown on all applicable grading, and building plans and details, notes, or as otherwise appropriate, and shall not be deviated from unless approved in advance in writing by the City's Environmental Review Coordinator. Cultural Resources 2. A qualified historical consultant shall provide documentation that records the historical significance of the church building and its relationship to the rest of the complex. The documentation shall record the existing condition before alterations occur, during demolition as the physical changes occur, and after completion of the construction and renovations. Photographs shall be taken from the same views and the locations for the 8 photographs shall be subject to the approval of the Environmental Review Coordinator. Specific documentation requirements are as follows: a) Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit or any construction permits, documentation of the existing condition shall be prepared and shall include: • One aerial photograph (to be found by electronic media), showing the existing layout of buildings in relation to each other. • One each overall contextual view of the church building in relation to its existing surroundings looking from each elevation of the church, • One view of each elevation of the church building documenting its existing configuration • One view of each entry • Representative views of all windows • Views of all architectural details, including but not limited to roofline, Mission Revival elements, lighting fixtures, finishes, hardware, decorative motifs, etc., • Interior views including overall interior, elevation views from each direction, alter area, and all azeas to be physically changed. b) Documentation during construction shall be prepared from the same views and in accordance with the requirements identified above for mitigation measure 2(a). c) Prior to final building permit inspection documentation after construction shall be prepared from the same views and in accordance with the requirements identified above for mitigation measure 2(a). All photographic documentation shall include three (3) copies at a minimum size of 5" x 7" using 35 mm film (in either black and white print or color), mounted two photos per page onto archival sleeves or cazdstock. The three sets of photographs shall be bound and indexed with description of photograph, date, accession number, and photographer's name. The front of the photographs shall have a Title Page and description of the proposed project and description of reason for documentation. Of the three required copies of the documentation, one bound copy shall remain in the possession of the church and made available to the public, one copy shall be sent to the South Coastal Information Center at San Diego State University, and one copy shall be given to a local historical library or repository (local library or historical society) as approved by the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) and to be made available to the public. 3. An interpretive brochure, display, and report that documents the relevant history of the church shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator. This requirement shall be met prior to occupancy. a) The interpretive brochure shall include: • The history of the church, its architecture and physical history; • A history of all physical alterations made to the buildings since their original construction; • Sufficient text and photos to adequately document these items; The brochure shall be made available to the parishioners and public. 9 b) The display shall include • Historic and recent photographs of the church; • Written text on the history of the church; • A model of the old and new church; • Sufficient text, photos, and interpretive props to adequately document and interpret these concepts. The display shall be provided within a permanent public space of the church complex (not necessarily limited to the church building itself). c) The report shall include written documentation on: • The history of the church (to include inception of the church at this location, growth of parish, its relationship with the community, its architecture and physical history): • The existing physical setting of the church complex and surrounding area; • Any physical alterations previously undertaken or proposed to the church complex; • The proposed expansion and renovation project • All of the information gathered during the preparation of the brochure and display (mitigation measures 3a and 3b). One copy of the report shall be provided to the City of Chula Vista, one copy shall be given to a Chula Vista library or repository (local library or historical society) as approved by the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC), and one copy shall be available to the public at the church. Geology and Soils 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading petrnit, the City Engineer shall verify that the final grading plans comply with the recommendations of the Final Geotechnica] Investigation Study including an Erosion Control Plan. All recommendations/measures shall be incorporated into the project design and construction documents. Compliance with said study shall become a permanent requirement of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Hazards/Hazardous Materials 5. During any demolition activities, a licensed and registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor shall perform asbestos and lead-based paint abatement in accordance with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations, including San Diego County Air Pollution Control District Rule 361.145 -Standard for Demolition and Renovation. Hydroloay/Water Quality 6. A hydrology study shall be submitted with grading plans and shall demonstrate that the post-development flow rate does not exceed the pre-development flow rate. 7. A Water Quality Technical Report shall be prepared and shall identify potential pollutants generated at the site during the post-development phase of the pruject and shall identify/propose appropriate structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimized discharge of such pollutants to the maximum extent practicable. 8. In accordance with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Permit, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be developed and implemented concurrent with the commencement of grading activities. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer shall verify that the grading or construction plans comply with the provisions of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region Order No. 2001-O1 with respect to construction related and permanent, post-construction water quality best management practices (BMPs). 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, temporary desilting and erosion control devices shall be installed. Protective devices will be provided at every storm drain inlet to prevent sediment from entering the storm drain system. These measures shall be reflected in the grading and improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Noise 11. A minimum five-foot high masonry wall shall be constructed along the western property boundary or alternatively, the hours of operation at St. Pius X shall be modified so that activities at the site occur only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on weekdays, and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on weekends. 12. Pursuant to Section 17.24.050(J) of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, project-related construction activities shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday and between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Saturdays and Sundays. 13. Prior to approval of building permits for the development the applicant shall submit a subsequent noise study to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator demonstrating that the final roof=mounted HVAC and other roof mounted equipment complies with the City's noise control ordinance at the property boundaries of 45 dBA Leq (one hour) during nighttime hours and 55 dBA Leq (one hour) during daytime hours or ambient noise levels, whichever is greater. 14. All rooftop pumps, fans, and air conditioners on the school and/or church complex buildings shall include appropriate noise abatement and be screened by a minimum three- foot high rooftop parapet that blocks the line-of=site view from the backyards of the neazby residential properties to the exposed roof and mechanical ventilation systems. The noise mitigation requirements shall be shown on all applicable demolition, grading, and building plans as details, notes, or as otherwise appropriate, and/or shall be made conditions of project approval where appropriate. G. Consultation 1. Individuals and Or¢anizations City of Chula Vista: Marilyn R.F. Ponseggi, Planning and Building Steve Power, Planning and Building John Schmitz, Planning and Building Carolyn Dakan, Planning and Building Gerald Moorer, RBF Consulting Frank Rivera, Engineering Samir Nuhaily, Engineering Silvester Evetovich, Engineering Dave Kaplan, Engineering Sandra Hernandez, Engineering Beth Chopp, Engineering Mark Caro, Parks and Recreation Justin Gipson, Fire Department Jessica Madson, Fire Department Richard Preuss, Police Department Dave Byers, Public Works/Ops. Applicant/Property Owner: Hal Gardner/CFO -Catholic Diocese of San Diego Reverend Joseph G. Masar, St. Pius Church Applicant Agent: Daniel D. White, Architect Others: Sweetwater Authority Chula Vista Elementary School District Cheryl Johnson, RECON 2. Documents City of Chula Vista General Plan, 1989 (as amended) Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code Final Historic Architectural Survey Report (HASR) and Findings of Effect Report (FOE), Galvin & Associates, August 2005 12 Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Improvements to Saint Pius Church, 1120 Cuyamaca Avenue, Chula Vista, California, Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc., January 17, 2003 Saint Pius X Church Expansion Project -Environmental Noise Assessment, DUDEK & Associates, Inc., September 1, 2005 Traffic Impact Analysis for Proposed St. Pius X Church Expansion, Darnell & Associates Inc., January 14, 2004 3. Initial Study This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, and any comments received to the Notice of Initial Study. The report reflects the independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information regazding the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning and Building Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910. Marilyn R. F. Ponseggi Environmental Review Coordinator J \Plnnning\MurvV\SL Pius\IS-O4-02R mnd2 Itldoc Date: 13 .---'~ ~- ~~ .~. ..-. ,-- ~ .~ - ,,~ ~- .~ - ,- .~- ,\ ~ ~~ CHURCH ~\ RENOVATION EXISTING \ RECTORY 7~ - ~ ~\ b ~ ~ • PLAZA \ ~\~ PARISH HALL MEETING \ \ KING ~~ ADDI t ~ " OFFICE \ X \ RENOVATION ~ t ` O PROPOSE i MULTI-PUF '~~ BUILDING '\ \ s r \ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ . `~\ ~ ~ PARKING \ 3 ~ '\ TRASH ENCLOSURE _ 3..~'°" \ PLAVGROI/N 1 \ EXISTING Jii EARTHQUAKE ~ \ SCHOOL SUPPLY / MCS \ 6TORAGE %%% v \ ~- ~ i~ ~ EXISTING \ ANNEX ~ - ~. CLASSROOM-~ ! -"'' PARKING ADDRKNi i .-~ STANDARD 214 ~- COMPACT 22 ~-- HANDICAP 7 - TOTAL 243 ~j/J REQUIRED 203 ~"°~ F.X~ilblt $ ATTACHMENT A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) St Pius X Catholic Church. IS-04-028. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared by the City of Chula Vista in conjunction with the proposed St. Pius X Catholic Church project. The proposed project has been evaluated in an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-04-028) prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City/State CEQA Guidelines. The legislation requires public agencies to ensure that adequate mitigation measures are implemented and monitored for Mitigated Negative Declarations. AB 3180 requires monitoring of potentially significant and/or significant environmental impacts. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for this project ensures adequate implementation of mitigation for the following potential impacts(s): 1. Air Quality 2. Cultural Resources 3. Geology and Soils 4. Ilazards/Ilazardous Materials 5. Hydrology and Water Quality 6. Noise 7. Traffic MONITORING PROGRAM Due to the nature of the environmental issues identified, the Mitigation Compliance Coordinators shall be the Environmental Review Coordinator, and City Engineer of the City of Chula Vista. The applicant shall be responsible to ensure that the conditions of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are met to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator and City Engineer. Evidence in written form confirming compliance with the mitigation measures specified in Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-04-028 shall be provided by the applicant to the Environmental Review Coordinator and City Engineer. The Environmental Review Coordinator and City Engineer will thus provide the ultimate verification that the mitigation measures have been accomplished. fable I, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist, lists the mitigation measures contained in Section F, Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Effects, of Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-04-028, which will be implemented as part of the project. In order to determine if the applicant has implemented the measure, the method and timing of verification are identified, along with the City department or agency responsible for monitoring/verifying that the applicant has completed each mitigation measure. Space for the signature of the verifying person and the date of inspection is provided in the last column. 1'VPlanning~Nl;iryVAS~. PiusUS-Ud-02%mmnextdoc _d f0 F E E 0 U m a ~ m ~ m a E-" o ~° U c v D n m ~ c T ~ D Q om U~ 0' w a ~ m ~ V O U 6 C O Q' a 'a o d aao ' Z o " x a~ F 0' w 0 C c ~ ~ o O X W O ~ OU C U E ~ N a x Z ` j u Q U' Z ~ _ K ~ O H Z C O O O a ;, N V O L_ Y U Z ~ 0 ~ N C N O '° L N O > s a F o a Dm o ~~ v oo D N D m '° °' Y E a ' ° " d °m voi m F o Q a o D rC n m o ~ ~ m ~ E ~ a 'io ~ m m ¢ ~ ° j~ ~ q ~ ¢ E °- Q °- O ~' N .N o~ 'm D o ~rv O od c m ` co C N O _ o N C N N ~ >s O ~ T N O N d N N- N N O N N N yy O ' c J L J O d N- O O y L O ~ U ° p N O m ~ ~ L O O N N C N D N ~ ~` N C~ S~ ~ m a O O ~~ O j O N C O O N UI d C ~ " N C C O 6_. _N D V T N p C N O O O O N m m N N y m .~ « C o J o d N ~ o ? G U ~~ U ~c - N D o~ N ~ n o C U ~_ U - o ° U U~ m m m O c ' ~ (6 E m N = O o rn O m N o n C O O U n N Q w O m N m O N N c v 1 m , j G7 O O <`o N ~ N m N ~ c a Y N p V E a~ ~ 3 C m'o O ~~ N C ~ U C ~ ~ C N N 3 D N L (O C O d 00 U O E= ~ O E ~ ry dry O. c D J N a°~ E m ` y O u rn O ~~ N N m e ` D o 6~ o ~ a 3 N `m Z' . , ~• J m~ ~~ N N ~` ~ N 6~ D O N ~ U N x oc co c J c m o Em ~$ L c ~E ~ c° _ o U N v `_. .~ N .~. O E ~ 'O C `O N N ~ N U N Cf ~ J 0~ U C] p D N ~ me Q Jry (0 U d _ y c ] d~ d c Q m-c 3N >"~ ao mo ~~ ~pa . O ~ C - U V O H N ~ ~ O J U OI ~ )1 N ~ (~ C L L-' O f0 tt N "' O N 3 O d _ ~ L N3 } ~} C N N U .N_.d dN tD NN N N ~N ~ U~ L O U > 3 03 NpN N N~ L DN C 3 O U E c E d 6 O N 0 N O 3 U 3 "O C O N U J Q o° 'c ~ N ~~ > ~ ~= n c > c U a U a ~ c` =° o .. . f 01 v~ >> > m a't0 ~ m w m N m N a> N A~m m._ m~ d NE - a s a.. N. i a o~ 01 °pj O C J O oa, o ~U > > p >m Q ~o ~~ inE aE ~~ J G~n ~n Kw > mo >NN an m U.: J VJN N K y c c ~ L J _ Q H -o a m D o a m o, r s E c o n 0 z c y o «~ ~ N DI N ::. d an a n J m _T Q U ~ c m d V ~' d N N qa~ -- „ x 0 d U D~« c G X pU ~ m c X y o n`. ~ Q R r 0 6 v N N G -O)dd ~° Ed`o 5 c L o a m 8'g c 9f y C -~ 11L c y N~pp y 9% CO U~~ 9 0 L ~ Cpp L~, ~~p .Ot y ~ ~ d d J O- U C y> N O $ L ~ ~ N 4>, ~p~~ m a ~'~O-k ~~nd o~C q N C `- N N U d d~ 0~ n ~ E c~$- C L O p N c~c pNOO Nrv "'~ ~ 94 9 6 L O W N ~(~OryrnEANyc $,o c8`op+o5$ ~z O.N°3~a~ ~ dE NL- a 0~~ y Q U d 'O 9 N $ OO 9 4 E~ C N O Dc ~~ y d 0 N U N ~ ~ 3 ~ O $'~- d i °ip~OO=~~mygN 1 Q Y R o A~-~ C N d «_ 9 F ~'.-. O d . d A N N ~ O ~3 ~ d ~J N ~ N N 0 C "Y [0 ~ d E ~ '" v ~: N ~ U C rb C C C a d 0 c ~ S ~ ° ~ 6 Ou~ a~E O N y :- 6 d y yd Q E£~ rv EyFL-dER ' i ~ cN rn rc n c .. u c n d o m ° x ' ~o ` o'c u n~a a d E~ yc c o m m ~ oE mV c o ~ n y e .. w j~ ONQ n fjC ~ pryOd d 3 ~ 'O O ~~ E d N -(p (0 L O W p r i 9,k yN t~~c0~~6 C t d C C O p ~ N O O 00 ~ ~ N d ~ "d C . 4p E c E y t p R i6 O E ry b S U 9~ w O O. ~ _ ] J 3 ~ O l/1 - ty (O _y N O 0 d G N r C U O t0 ~ ~i . v. N ~'~ d y ~ ~ ~ d O C O K U O O 0 i N O m mm .S 8 , ~ ~ ~ l 9 O C d O C C y C O ~ i o, « L S ~p 3 a0i ro 0 N> ~ d V E ~ O t0 N ~~ tp t0 N Q O ry~~ m ~ 9~ l6 r,) N~. O - 0 N d N U N N d O Vf O 6F- ~ 8 0 o N.~ ~ N~ ~L ~ 9 C WO O a m d C~ C s U N y 1 N D1 d a C oo ~ N Ui L N_" L i m d'~ L O A N U =ag' ~ L° o~ ~mL'>~c ui~ m~ o d c~~ O y 0 E~ t L S E n ~G p ~ E3 ~mzc ~ c $ ~ h n9 a~ru o ~d pp~~~ Rg ~ 3~ cLi ~N aci AO a~E ' ~ c °o Od d 0 N t6 y p V C L ~ C 7i N O s~ ~ N ip ~ ~ N D 0 U ~ o~ ~~ 6 O F 1 ~ d O y i E~ ~ l > 6~~ ~ O O Q O nU ~ N~ 'O t ~ ~ y 9 d ~~ L C~~ C ~J O C O C~ 7 .E ~ C '^' U O C C ~ d ~ .r- ~. d d !v 6.O ~ N W N L d p 8 0 E °' O 1] r O 0 a U V Q U d 6 N~ U n ~ ` ro =_ _ a N v m ~. d a m f- 9 ~ 0 .4+f U V N~ I C C" ~p A F C (n ~ O y O ~ U N 6 N N~~ ~ 7 N d L N '. O U n 6 O O~ N C 1 41 N i 0 ss m N~ m G m ~~m o T ~ an o ~ _ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ E _ w E J p O p U N C d iO = ry d v uOiOVL La ~ N O V O N O y O ~. _' r- c 5°~ m a N n ~o~QOO~9a ~a 0 N ~ L _ d ` > ~ .. O D~U "p OCO m °n~ cam ;~o 2'~pw 0 0~ a g rv~ ~~ '°U ° m o V ~ 10 j~~+ ~~q C N~ N~ O `N- U^ 'D U ~ N T'p ~ ~ ~ U p ~ p N O. N N G ._ O O O mt-, VV EL' ~ t= m a _m Ta Uc a d c m ~ c °_ C ~ Y ~i o 0 x -r r o°o y x a 21 - N r d U d d ° N y c R m v d r E ~ u 3 `o ° d c mrto Sdo C aV u n m 3 m mad a c m m ro ~K L ~ O Q ~ ~ O u ~ n d o m mc, E > > c o2wn 0 d l0 d ~ / y ~ L Q r c d a > ~ E mom' ~~ C ~ N ~ N ¢£t6 pj C7 dn~ ~ o ~~ ~ n s L p N ._. ~ 6 ~~ U O N d S E ~ o.a 3~ .. ° ~° c°' y Fi my S~o~ a ~ ~ ~ L a~ 'o.~ o ama ~ v o aa10i Un ~ w~ c a d E m N J `° E m m r cm cT m~tm ~ ~ ~°~a $~`°~u ~ C i0 .L-. ° ~ N d'c c d m~ d >• c d o> ~w d e" L € tO m 9 m U ~ J ~ ~ .~ ~ N drj ~~ 023 ~ ~ ~`c ~m o. m" c'~ co.~ 0 5uo``~.°~ °U~~~ .° 2~ o-c5 f5. ,erg °. o~ dm d 'g_ L° n ,~ '3 ~ d m O` ~ ri5`m d` ° m d .s cc5 °c ~ c` C Q$ d C o. ~ a d m 6 p `~ a °-- m~ ud m ~ m o d `° v ; c ~ ~ j~~ N o c~ o ~9 ~~ y g m pup _ (~_p L >_ L e~V 'N alt a9 X0..0 'O Ob dd dU0T' UN~jC09 LSO N.4 m g so° `°~ ~° o-'r mr°@ S°' a ac m~ ds nmm Na >m m e d~ ~ c m v °~E °~ ~~~ E L rn~ d m m n m E K m °t ~~ro ~ ~£o .~ ~ ~ c~4E n9-5'~3J ~Nn ~"m °" °3Yt m ro~~ a;v a5~ s z'~c4 c3~O o~~ y a~~m y O O C yl N N N C X ~ T (0 L~ N O~ d N ~ L m 6 Y II p E d '~ N E ^.+ N d C~ L U C C N y ..X = 6 O D• w m (7 O U. J O 1] o Z N c m m d u c ~~dpp d d >, d o o. ~ Z d N d a d Z` ~ 6N N O~ d." J y ~~p d 0 Q N~~] d d J.L..s d~ ~ Ot ru ° 60 0->L `ry L r ._ ~- U d Y+ ~ m O.'~ 21 Vi L C ~ C N c m°.co~y o v v,cE Jv NdL m~L.-v3sh mQ n1-¢od :ow >. m L N J f'n 5 ~ t=~ Q N d 'n ~ E h c 9~ m n L H .r G a ~ d d 7 p> 5 c4 1- L ~ ,~ ~ U r a m N Q N ~ _- - -- - ~, c ~ c ~ N c c m a ~ ~' o•~- o' c m ~rn« Umcm c m p~ m= ~U c 9 m m m~ E ~ c m m c ~ ern,. 'Vaco E m a°',>E ~cm a ~~9a ~ U c~ N N d ~ •J U c m i0 -~1 O~ a U 1 W N p , ad ~ ~ n ti u c m ro awn m a ul m^ __ C O U~'-o °' ~cinm an a'c~ Qw Np _~__- ~ E 'a' ~ g W ro X ~clIl io Qw Np X -c a>n y ___~-- ~ X y ~ N N q W N p R V X 0 o X N L N ~ U rn w ~ o X X c c X OU X 0 ~m OV ~ X E a X v t X o S ° OU m ~ X V 6 U ^' c X a~ ~ ~ r x- d c ~ ° C N ° Y y1 C N~ Y U __- ~ c N 4 ~ m c m a (n O jy U C 0) 6 N L ~ ~ G U U d ro L N d V N V C N y N L N °' U C ` C N N C d d C .y O W L C 6. U- C a "O O C a W ~ N~ Nt° dU ama c-°~ EOm.. V~6~Oa v n 0- V~ N 3 N'ui m~~ E o- a d i .n K N m mL~ aEul'COy `OO adUadA U60. 6N O ro~O1dj dU- O• d .. VVC c6 ._ _ O.. N~ r N_C~ E N O U U `d Q ~` r ro Q~~ N C d '~ b N o E C N c6 6 •~ O ro N.- y ~ N y d ~ O~ O U aC CC ONO X60 Ti 6.d :p n,_ O(64~ f =O~pE nO.~~~~0 o r°, roaEEa°~ m... .°i `-° ~P m ° o a~L ~'"° ~~ E p1U °-'2m Y° dd m° and as. `0 m4 ~ >~ nR~ 3r~ ~ Ge c m° c~ .c ~o o'O° ~a N`"~ `m Z'a 39 m ~c° N mN `m o: «. m o~~N , ~E o.c7c° d16 domm~n non L'mA.°%aoo mNL °1m° DON m °imU `~co Eo ~' ~ m ~.QV ~ i °N C v~L ro..6 3 mN5 N~.> m,• ~d`G ~m`i wn ~nc 4 As Nro dN Y ~~o d ~noEu 5 .0.~ os. o.m m~t0 -o m v o c° ~ d J N^ d K ~_ m 6 d N N ~G d o ar N- d V mA«ulmo m~ W Ncc^O~n 4 rom roof ro°~ rot m °~~~ ~. OTC CLUN ~ ~y.~.~c~ L~ UO-6 mp LN~i C.NL O.~ ~4 iF `O N N O ~ E 6 ~ n_ ^ ~C ~ a N R d N U j L NQ U C N OiN d4,°p N~o "N~ ~ Nrr U~ d OrL m « O N Ny 3U 3 `~C N« C C Ny lb y Oi N N 6 N U lT~ W N N m Y iQ 4 0 ... L 9 YJ U t¢ U d N T~ O .j d O N~ 9 N N O O ro ~ O ~ 7 Q? T O U r 6 N 6 N N_ U V Ct d a .> ,O~ N 4~ a^ C F j m"ac ~O~RO 4 ,O ~~N 7~~L NEO ~~,6«(9 'OVAN OCN ON~daC O m d E -° c 4 5 r ^~ y a v Y G 5 ~io V` rn4 c CS N« 4 `° m ro o n v m~ o, c m 6 m O N'~'° 30 = ~°mNflNN o0 °rom mvrn 'Ec romm°E~c`-6 z° ~,: N~n r acpc oLO m_c=°._ar ° E dW aZi ~ z m cro u c if> c NNOO°_ om~ oNa ro mc~ x cp'1 ~. ? 7 5 N~~ cm o' N E E D rn N N m~ c a p L g m 4 N a N N E d n ~ ° Gl do~~E ~~~ 3A $' °dU ~~ qro a. pm s W ~-"'3=`~U rod ~ ~ ` ~ r L U ,ri X N ~} n a• d .Q m C m C m C m C m C ~ a a a a C N J m J m J m J m >`.a ~a ~a vU Da . j~~ j O j O N j O N j~ N N c~~~ N cmE co~E ca~E caiE c om ~.. c m% m c`. ° c m` mc_ ~ c~ mc., " c am ~ _ m ° c~ o. a~-a °- c ~¢ c n ao n c n nao a c n aao o. c n nao aw ~o 2 ¢ a ao x x x x V ~« c x _ x G ~ O X X X X pU x a o x x x x U Y- N O ~ O N O ~ O N O U y U ~ U Y U U N n U d N. U N U N L U d Ipt N aU5 (OL aU5 (OL N aU5 N N ao5 NL N dU5 T-Q C C O) r I d O d 0 0 Li ~ a1 ac 0 N . ~~ N G J N L ' p N "p N N (0 (0 0~ O N O S S ` D U N N N O N'O a N c 0 ~ « ~ a ~ ~_ t0 0 ~> _ _ N C O 0 0~ c L> C O~ C N L ~ n N E O O C 3 EcEE °i5 T `">~°a 1OmEc y E>.oLNVCm Q J ~ vo. ~.t c_mo ' ~ N ._O O N -, o... L.~ o N N C ~mia~ S o n N c om n'O U"T ~ o cC~a--q ~ ~n ON 3 N On rvEo~ N L mm> c V~ c v E 5 v U p o n d y ~ U m o a o m>> o E N c o = Z. d- c E N S a~ n d o 0 0 N o - o v n N n y d 3 y U v.n a E g a d d D d ~' c' = n ~ ° N °'L a>>rn°'O m r y~o £~ ovm a y ry v'o Sq=oq> V c N a N y vc~.__n>, o.cm o n N v G~ y N o~c o- _ c` c °c O N = c K= `o o ry~1 a- m 4 c t O) v 10 ~ C `~ w v> r O N 3 E m ~' C J t~ O G C L N .1 3 d~ p ~ q l6 T C~ O N~ ¢ U y a ~~m N m ~o v c `~ 9° v a m a Z j~ L ~ a N d a1 C C c 3 p C N N E N a C" ~ oO ~ U N a) L~ C N O) a) O' ~ °om5 o$xYg " orn5 u' uvi tDE v~md g .~a'~N~i Ec _~ vo p,.LO m N ~ adcn noN~ poo Dv_v~ ~ ~'m~'o p U n N N L~ a~ a r d~ 0 j L m ~ N c~ u N~ a N N N O O ~ = E 5 m v .°-~o N o m 'o v 5 m L a v o .~._ w N N c ~ d a v v~ c S c co3o"n Lo._>, G oan tn v nE coE ~' o N cN o waa o N NEc ~Eccdm ~eE ~ oN£iaE nt~ moot N S a i w y d p ~. m d o a " S ~n a c m a U m ~ n N m - m a n$ ~ c rn E o o E >~mE v-o v>~v ~ dm °~ y`$v o oo oU oho > orn55cm °r c~ mE dm,~m ..vN a~E°o~- ~Eav ~ ma dLO n~-- E 3 n 3 o of n ' nN C' ocy~, n o~ v~G ovn g ov:: ~vcam nL mr ~ n m m cv v a ' c ` m Ea ao ° m A ~. '~dco° o m `a .a _°m ° ' ~, o "o°EEv w E£ c m o o v n c ~'Un`°m v °~w c m oim o o g%y c v '° E o d «l E 4~wmmNa.m f4 S Or O Y .E c~£ m `~~moE l. O C C ~ C on~Eo:o o~c~ , O O N O a!?=YCSn d~n ~° a o a`oa`~vTi ~cn we zU gwcm a~ dawn- a mn m~E otorn ¢ m°c c .cOO aXi tL-°a -oaa mn O N ('~ V 0 O d \ll// riiA-. CnV OF ENVRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CHUTA VISTA 1. Name of Proponent: Catholic Diocese of San Diego 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 3. Addresses and Phone Number of Proponent: 1120 Cuyamaca Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91911 (619)420-9193 4. Name of Proposal: St. Pius X Catholic Church 5. Date of Checklist: December 15, 2005 6. Case No. IS-04-028 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS QUESTIONS: Less Than Significant Potentially µ+ith Less Than ISSaCS: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) I Iave a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ^ ^ ^ ^ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ^ ^ ^ ^ not limited to, tress, rock outcroppings, and historic bltildings within a state sceluc highway? c) Substantially degrade dte evsting visual character or ^ ^ ^ ^ 9ualits of the site and its sLUrountlings? Less Than Signifcaot ISSUCS: Potentially with Less Than Signscant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ^ ^ ^ ^ which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a-b) The project site contains no scenic resources, vistas or views open to the public, and is not in proximity to a state scenic highway, therefore, there would be no impact to the aesthetics of the area. c) The project site is located within a developed single-family residential area that contains limited commercial uses. The proposed church and school expansion is compatible with the existing architectural design and would not degrade the visual character of the project site or its surroundings therefore no impact would occur. d) The project proposal includes new lighting facilities in the parking lot including lighting standards a distance of 70 feet from the west property line adjacent to the residences. The project shall be required to comply with the light and glare regulations (Section 19.66.100) of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC). Compliance with the regulations will ensure that no substantial glare or light would affect daytime or nighttime views in the surrounding area or onto the adjacent or nearby residential properties therefore no impact would occur as a result of the proposed project. Mitieation: No mitigation measures are required. II. AGRICULTURAL. RESOURCES. In detennitung whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant em~ironmental effects, lead agendes may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evah~atiun and Site Assessment 1\todel (1997) prepared by the Califorta Dept. of Consemadon as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agric~dmre and Eamiland. ~~'oiild the project. Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially with Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Convert Prime Fatrnland, Unique Familand, or ^ familand of Statewide hnpurtance (farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resotuces Agency, to non-agricultural use? Less Than Significant No Impact Impact ^ ^ b) ConIlict with earisting zoning for agricultural use, or a ^ ^ ^ ^ Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ^ ^ ^ ^ which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion oEFarnaland, to non-agricultural us'e? Commeuts• a-c) The project site and surrounding land uses are fully developed, consistent with the Chula Vista General Plan and zoning designation, and contain no agricultural resources or designated farmland. The proposal would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use and no impacts to agricultural resources would be created as a result of the proposed project. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required. IILAIR QUALITY. \Tlicre available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the Eullowu~g determinations. \C'ould the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ^ ^ ^ ^ applicable air quality plan? Issues; Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact b) Violate any air quality standard ar contribute ^ ^ ^ ^ substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase ^ ^ ^ ^ of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attairunent under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ^ ^ ^ ^ concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affectuig a substantial ^ ^ ^ ^ number of people? Comments• a-e) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E. Mitigation: See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section F. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. C44nild the project: a) !-lave a substanti~il adverse effect, either directly or ^ ^ ^ ^ dirot~~h habllat moditications, un anp specirs identified as a candidate, sensitive, or speci.il stan~s IS$IIQ3: species un local or regional plans, policies, or regrations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Then Sigoificanl Potentially With Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ^ habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ^ protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological intexmption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any ^ uadve resident ur migratory fish or wildlife species or widz established nattve resident or migratory wildlife comdors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? c) Contlict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree presen-anon policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the pxo~isions of an adopted I Iabitat ^ ^ Coasexvation Plan, Nahtral Conununvty Consen-ation Plan, or other approved local, mgional, or sere habitat consen-adon plan? Less Than Significant Impact No Impact ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Less Thaa Sigaificaat Potentially kith Less Thaa ISSUe3: Significant Mitigation Signscant No Impact Impact Ineorporated Impact Comments• a-c) The project site is located within a designated development area pursuant to the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and is fully developed. There are no candidate, sensitive or special status species, sensitive natural communities or wetlands present within or immediately adjacent to the project site. d) No native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or native wildlife nursery sites exist within or immediately adjacent to the project site. e) No biological resources are present on the project site and no impacts or conflicts with local policies and ordinances protecting biological resources would result. ~ No impacts or conflicts with local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans would result from the project since the project site is located in a designated development area pursuant to the adopted Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and no biological resources area present. Miti¢ation: No mitigation measures are required. V. CULTURAL. RESOURCES. VG'ould the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in [he ^ ^ ^ ^ significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change ui the ^ ^ ^ ^ significance of an archaeological resource pursc~.lnt to ~ 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ^ ^ ^ ^ paleon[uluyical resource or site or unique gerilo};ic feature ISSneS: d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Thao Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact ^ ^ ^ Comments• a-d) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E. Mitigation: See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section F. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the nsk of loss, injury or death involving: i. Ruphrre of a known earthquake faLilt, as ^ delineated on the most recent rllquist Priolo Earthquake FaLdt Inning Map issued by the State Gcv dogist Eor the area or based on other suhstantal evidence of a ]mown EaLilt? Refer to Di«sion of Mines and Geology Special Publication 4?. ii. Strong seismic ground shakitg? ^ m. Seismic-related ground failiue, ixluding ^ liyucEaction? i~~. Landslides? ^ h) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ^ ropsoil~ c) Be I. seated un a geologic untt ur soil that is ^ unstable, nr that wn~ild become unstable as a ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ Less Than Signi~caot Potentially With Less Than ISSUeS: SigniTicant Mitigation SigniScant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact restdt of the project, and potentially result in on- or off site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ^ 18 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the ^ use of septic tanks or altemadve wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available fox the disposal of wastewater? Comments• a-e) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E. Miti¢ation: See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section F. VII. HA7.ARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and acadent conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the em-ixontnent? c) F.mit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-cluartcr Hole of an existing or proposed school? ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Issues: Potentially Sggnitcant Impact d) Iic located nn a site which is uicluded on a list of ^ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Goverrunent Code section 65962.5 and, as a resLilt, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) Por a project located within an airport land use plan ur, where such a plan has not been adopted, within hvo miles of a public airport or public use airport, woiild the project result in a safety hazazd for people residing ur working in the project area? f} For a project within the viani[y of a private airstrip, would the project result u~ a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Imp:tir implementation of or phVSically interfere «~ith an adopted emcrgcncy~ response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Thaa Sigoificaot With Less Thao Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ h) F_spose people or structures to a sigtificant risk ^ of loss, injury ur death involving wildland sires, ntchidutg where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are in[em~ixed with ~~ikilands? Comments• a-c) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section b. ^ ^ ^ Miti>;atiou: See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section F. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than I$sUe$: SignScant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. ~~'otild the project: a) Result in an increase in pollutant discharges to ^ receiving waters (including impaired water bodies pursuant to the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list), result in significant alteration of receiving water quality during or following construction, or violate any water quality standards or waste discharge mquirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ^ interE~rc substantially with groundwater recharge such that there woiild be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a Icvel which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Result in a potentially significant adverse impact on groundwater quality? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ^ site or area, includvag dtxough the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, u~ducling [hxough tine alteration of the course of a stream or river, substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result ut flooding ou- or off-site, or place structures within a ]00-year flood hazard area which wotild impede or redirect flood flows? ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Potentially I33Ue5: Significant Impact c) Espose people ox stmctares to a sigrilficant risk of ^ loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? E) Create ox contribute runoff water, which would ^ exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted mnofF~ Comments• a-~ See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E. Mitisation: See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section F. IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. \y'ould the project: Less'I'hao Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Thao Significant No Impact Impact ^ ^ a) Ph}-sically di~~ide an established corrununiry? ^ ^ ^ b) Conflict with any applicable Lend use plan, policy, ^ ^ ^ or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (htcluding, but not united to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, ur zoning orditancc) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mirifnting an cnviroruncntal effect? c) Conflict with any applicable hahitat conservation ^ ^ ^ plan ur natural annmunity conservadou plan? ^ ^ ^ ^ Issues: Comments: Less Thaa Signscaot Potentially With Less Thaa Significant Mitigation Sigaificaot Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact a) The project site and the surrounding uses are fully developed. The proposed remodeling of the church and school facilities would not dismpt or divide the established community therefore no impact would occur as a result of the proposal. b) The project site is located in the Rl (Single-Family Residential) Zone and RLM (Low-Medium Density) General Plan land use designation. The project is consistent with the applicable zoning regulations and land use designations, therefore; no impacts are anticipated. c) The project would have no impact or conflict with any applicable adopted environmental plans or policies and would not conflict with the adopted Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan, which designated the proposed project site as a Developed Area. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required. X. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Resiilt u~ Che loss of availability of a known mineral ^ ^ ^ ^ resource that would be of value m the region and the residents of the state? b) Restilt in the loss of availability of a k>cally-important ^ ^ ^ ^ mineral resource recovery site do ineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments• a-b) The proposed project has been previously disturbed and would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource of value to the region or the residents of the state and has not been designated for mineral resource protection by the State of California Department of Conservation. "Therefore, no impacts to mineral resources would occur as a result of the proposed project. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required. Issues: XI. NOISE. Would the project result in: Less Than Significant Potentially Rrith Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels ^ ^ ^ ^ in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) ExposLUe of persons to or generation of excessive ^ ^ ^ ^ groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? c) A substantial perrrtanent utcxease in ambient noise ^ ^ ^ ^ levels un the project vicinity above levels existing ~y7thout the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ^ ^ ^ ^ ambient noise levels in the pxojcct vicitity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ^ ^ ^ ^ or, where such a plan bas not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, woiild the pxojcct expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project widin the ~dciniry of a private airstrip, ^ ^ ^ ^ wotild the project expose people residiug or working in the project area to cscessive noise levels? IS3lleS: Comments: a-d) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E. Less Thaa Significant Potentially with Less Than Sign cant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact e-f) The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, nor is it located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Brown Field Airport is the nearest airstrip located approximately 7 miles southeast. The proposed project would not result in exposure to excessive noise levels therefore no impacts will result from the project. Mitigation: See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section F. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. ~~'ould the project: a) Induce substantial popcdation grua~th va an area, ^ ^ ^ ^ either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirecdy (for example, through extension of road or other u~frastmcture)? b) Displace substantial ntunbers of existing housing, ^ ^ ^ ^ necessitating the consmuction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, ^ ^ ^ ^ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Less'rhao Significant Potentially With Less Thao ISSUfS: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated impact Comments• a-c) The project involves remodeling and expansion of the church and school facilities and does not propose new residential development that would induce population growth or divide the established community. Furthermore, no displacement of housing or persons necessitating the constrtiction of replacement housing or adverse impacts to population or housing would occur as a result of the proposal. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES. ~x'ould the project: Rcsidt ui suhstantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered gr>vexnmental facilities, nerd for new or physicaly altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintaut acceptahle sen~ce ratios, response tunes or other performance objectives for any public services: a) fire protection? h) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Parks? ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ el Other public facilities? ^ ^ ^ ^ Less Than Signitcaot Potentially With Less Than L4$ueS: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Comments• a) According to the Fire Department, adequate fire protection services can continue to be provided to the site. The applicant is required to comply with the Fire Department policies for new building construction and fire prevention. The City's Fire performance objective and thresholds will continue to be met. b) According to the Police Department, adequate police protection services can continue to be provided upon completion of the proposed project. The proposed project would not have a significant effect upon or result in a need for substantial new or altered police protection services. The City performance objectives and thresholds will continue to be met. c) The proposed project would not induce substantial population growth; therefore, no significant adverse impacts to public schools would result. According to the Chula Vista Elementary School District letter dated August 18, 2005, any facility used exclusively for religious purposes is exempt from school fees. d) Because the proposed project will not induce a substantial population growth, it would not create a demand for neighborhood or regional parks or facilities or impact existing park facilities. e) The proposed project would not have a significant effect upon or result in a need for new or expanded governmental services and would be served by existing or planned public infrastructure. Mitieation: No mitigation measures are required. XIV. RECREATION. Would the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? ^ ^ ^ ^ b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ^ ^ ^ ^ Issues: Comments: Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact a) The proposed project would not induce population growth; therefore an increase in the use of neighborhood or regional parks or facilities would not occur or have an impact on existing recreational facilities. b) The project does not include or require construction or expansion of recreational facilities and the site is not planned for any future parks and recreation facilities or programs that would have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Mitieation: No mitigation measures are required. XV. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC. `X'oiild the project a) Caine an increase in traffic which is substantial in ^ ^ ^ ^ relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result ui a substantial h~crease v~ eithex the number of vehicle taps, the volume to capacity ratio nn roads, or congestion at intersections)? h) Exceed, eithex individually or cumiilatively, a level of ^ ^ ^ ^ service sumdaxd established by the county congestion management agency for designated toads ur lzighwavs? c) Rescilt in a change ui air traffic patterns, including ^ ^ ^ ^ either an tncrease in traffic levels or a change vi location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially utcreasc hazards due to a design framre ^ ^ ^ ^ (rg., sharp cutt~es ox dangerous intersections) or incr ~mpatihle uses (e.g., Eann eyuipmcnt)2 e) Result m uiadeyuate emergency access? ^ ^ ^ ^ Less Than Significant Potentially With Ness Than ISSUeS: Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact ~ Result in inadequate parking capacity? ^ ^ ^ g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ^ ^ ^ supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a-g) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E Mitieation: See Mitigated Negative Declaration Section F. XVI. UTII.ITIES AMID SERVICE SYSTEMS. Wottld the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment xegturemestts of the ^ ^ ^ applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or restilt in the construction of new water or ^ ^ ^ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which cotild cause sigt>i6cant environmental effects? c) Require or restilt in the construction of new storm ^ ^ ^ water drainage EaciGties nr expansion of cxisting facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) TIave suFfident water supplies available to serve the ^ ^ ^ project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new r ~r expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a detettninatlon by the wastewater treatment ^ ^ ^ provider wlilch scree, or may sen-e the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's extsrurg comn.itments? ~ Be served b~ a landfill with s'uEficient penmtted ^ ^ ^ capadry to accommodate the project's solid waste tlisposal needs? No Impact ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than IsSUCS: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact g~ Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and ^ ^ ^ ^ regiilations related to solid waste? Comments• a) The project is located within an urban area that is served by all necessary utilities and service systems and would not exceed the wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur as a result of the proposed project. b) See XVI.a. No construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities would be necessary to serve the project. Development of the project will not impact existing water or wastewater treatment facilities. c) No construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities would be necessary as a result of the proposed project. 'fhe project is required to implement Best Management Practices to prevent pollution of stone drainage systems and comply with the City's Storm Water Management Requirements therefore environmental impacts would be less than significant. d) The project site is within the Sweetwater Water District service territory. There is an 8-inch water main located along the north side of Naples Street, a 6-inch main along the east side of Cuyamaca Avenue, a 6-inch main along the north side of Emerson Street, and six existing water services for the property. According to the Sweetwater Authority, based upon the fire flow availability, the capacity of the existing facilities is adequate to serve the project site. No new or expanded entitlements are anticipated for the proposed project. e) See XVt.a. and b. t~ The City of Chula Vista is served by regional landfills with adequate capacity to meet the solid waste needs of the region in accordance with state law. The proposal is not anticipated to generate a significant amount of solid waste which would exceed the capacity of the Otay Landfill therefore impacts to the facility are less than significant g) In accordance with the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the applicant will be required to implement a Recycling and Solid Waste Management Plan and will comply with all tedcril, slate and local regulations related to solid waste. Therefore, impacts are considered to be less than significant. Miti¢ation: No mitigation measures are required. Less Thao SigoiTicaot Potentially With Less Than Issues: Sign cant Mitigation Signscant Impact Incorporated Impact XVII. THRESHOLDS bVill the proposal adversely impact the City's Threshold Standards? A. f.ib~arv ^ ^ ^ The City shall construct 60,000 gross square feet (GSF) of additional library space, over the June 30, 2000 GSF total, in the azea east of Interstate 805 by buildout. The constmction of said facilities shall be phased such that the City will not fall below the dty- wide ratio of 500 GSF per 1,000 population. Library facilities are to be adequately equipped and staffed. Bj Police ^ ^ ~ a) Emergency Response: Properly equipped and staffed police units shall respond [0 81 percent of "Priority Une" emergency calls within seven ('7) minutes and maintain an average response time t~ all "Priority One" emergency- calls of 5.5 minutes or less. b) Respond to 57 percent of "Priority "1'wo" urgent calls within seven (7) minutes and maintain an average response time to all "Priority Two" calls of 7.5 minutes or less. C) Fire and Emergency Medical ^ ^ ^ Emergency response: Properly equipped and staffed fire and medical uttits shall respond to calls throughout the Ciry widen 7 mtxtutes ut 80Y'~ of the cases (mcastucd annually). D) Traffic ^ ^ ~ lhe'ihreshold Standards regture that all uttenections must operate at a l.evd of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (T,OS) "D" may omtr during the peak hvo hoots of dte dap a[ signalized No Impact ^ Less Than Significaot Potentially H,ith Less Than ISSU¢S: Significaot Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact intersections. Signalized intersections west of 1-805 are not to operate at a LOS below their 1991 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "F," or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. E) Parks and Recreation tlreas ^ ^ ^ "1'he Threshold Standard For Parks and Reae~tion is 3 acres of neighborhood and community parklarnd with appropriate facilities / 1,01>n population east of I 805. I) Drainage ^ ^ ^ The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and vohunes not exceed Ciry Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary inprovements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City F.ngineeriag Standards. G) Sewer ^ ^ ^ Tlne Threshold Standards regtre that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City F.ngineexing Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. T I) \X~ater ^ ^ ^ "The 'T'hreshold Standards reyrirc That adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities arc constructed concurrrntly with plamned gro~~nlt and that water quality standards axe not jeopardized during growth and construction. No Impact ^ llpplicants may also be xegrtited to participate in whatever water conservation or fee uff--set program the City of Chrila Vista has it effect at dre tune of building permit issuance. Issues: Comments• Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated impact No Impact a) The project is not a housing development and would not induce population growth; therefore, no impacts to library facilities would result. No adverse impact to the City's Library Threshold Standards. b) According to the Police Department, adequate police protection services can continue to be provided upon completion of the proposed project. The proposed church expansion project would not have a significant effect upon or result in a need for substantial new or altered police protection services. No adverse impact to the City's Police Threshold Standards would occur as a result of the proposed project. c) According to the Fire Department, adequate fire protection and emergency medical services can continue to be provided upon completion of the proposed project. Although the Fire Deparhnent has indicated they will provide service to the project, the project will contribute to the incremental increase in fire service demand throughout the City. This increased demand on fire services will not result in a significant cumulative impact. No adverse impact to the City's Fire threshold standards would occur as a result of the proposed project. d) The surrounding street segments and intersections will continue to operate in compliance with the City's traffic threshold Standard LOS "C" or better with the projected project traffic. No adverse impact to the City's tmflic threshold standards would occur as a result of [he proposed project. e) This Threshold Standard is not applicable, as the church expansion project is located west of Interstate 805. f) The proposed project includes drainage improvements designed in accordance with City standards. Based upon the review of the project, the Engineering Department has determined that there aze no significant issues regarding the proposed drainage improvements of the project site. In accordance with City standards, post- developed flows shall not exceed pre-developed flows and a final dminage study will be required in conjunction with the grading plans. No adverse impacts to the city's storm drainage system or City's drainage threshold standards will occur as a result of the proposed project. g) "fhe sewer facilities serving the project site consist of an 8-inch sewer line running east-west along Emerson Street to which a new 4-inch sewer lateral connection is proposed. The Engineering Department has determined that these facilities are adequate to serve the proposed project. No adverse impacts to the City's sewer system or the Sewer Threshold Standards will occur as a result of the proposed project. h) Pursuant to correspondence received from the Sweetwater Authority Water District, there are water mains located along the frontages of the project site that are currently serving and may continue to serve the project site. No adverse impacts to the City's Water Threshold standards will occur as a result of the proposed project. Mitieation: No mitigation measures are rcyuired. Less Than Significant Poteo[ially with Less Than IssUe$: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ^ ^ ^ ^ quality of the em~irrnunent, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history ox prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ^ ^ ^ ^ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when dewed va connecton with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects ofpxobable fimre projects.) c) Does the project have envirotunental effects which ^ ^ ^ ^ will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The project site is currently developed and located in an established urbanized area within the designated development area of the adopted Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan. However, as discussed in Section E of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, a historic architectural resource could be impacted by the proposed development. Appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce impacts to below a level of significance. b) As described in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, sig~»licant direct project impacts would be mitigated to below a level of significance through the required mitigation measures. When the proposed project is considered in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects, no cumulative considerable impacts have been identified and none are contemplated. c) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E. Potential impacts to humans associated with the short- term air quality impacts, hydrology/water quality, hazard hazardous materials, and noise would he mitigate to below a level of significance. XIX. PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES: Project mitigation measures are contained in Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-04-028, Section F, Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Impacts, and Table 1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. XX. AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT MITIGATION MEASURES By signing the line(s) provided below, the Applicant(s) and/or Operator(s) stipulate that they have each read, understood and have their respective company's authority to and do agree to the mitigation measures contained herein, and will implement same to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator. Failure to sign the line(s) provided below shall indicate the Applicants' and/or Operator's desire that the Project be held in abeyance without approval. L~~~i . ~~~~1 -I~,'r,~ r- Printed Name and Title of Authorized Representative of Diocese of San Diego l.~''--~. , ~1..!~~C.~~', !y'am' Signature of uthorized Representative Diocese of S n Diego Printed Name and Title of [Operator if different from Property Owner] Signature of Authorized Representative of [Operator if different from Property Owner] '~ n ~~ Date Date Date XXI. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the previous pages. ^ Land Use and Planning ^ Population and Housing ^ Geophysical ^ Transportation/Traffic ^ Biological Resources ^ Energy and Mineral Resources ^ Public Services ^ Utilities and Service Systems ^ Aesthetics ^ Agricultural Resources ^ Hydrology/Water ^ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ^ Cultural Resources ^ Air Quality ^ Noise ^ Recreation ^ 't'hreshold Standards ^ Mandatory Findings of Significance XXII. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the ^ environment, and a Negative Declaration will be prepared. 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the ^ environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made or agreed to by the project proponent. A Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared. 1 find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, ^ and an Environmental Impact Report is required. I find that the proposed project may have a "potentially significant impact" or ^ "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An Environmental Impact Report is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. t find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the ^ environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EII2 or Negative Declaraton pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Marilyn R.F. Ponseggi Environmental Review Coordinator City of Chula Vista Date P~Vlamm~gAMaryV~Si Nlus'~IS-O4-U2R cktri SL Piuc ~3oc