HomeMy WebLinkAboutRCC AGENDA PK 1992/08/10mitigated negative declaration
PROJECT NAME: Fifth Avenue Golf Range/Sports Center
PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast corner Broadway/SR-54, north of "C" Street, in
the northern portion of the City of Chula Vista, California
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0. 562-364-02
PROJECT APPLICANT: National Avenue Associates
CASE N0: IS-91-50 (B) DATE: June. 23, 1992
A. Pro.iect Setting
The project site is vacant, and has received surcharge soils as allowed by
current Coastal Development Permits. The Historic Sweetwater River
Channel cuts across the western portion of the site. The new human-made
channel of the Sweetwater River is adjacent to the .site's northern
boundary.
Pro.iect Description
The project proposes to develop a golf driving range, putting and chipping
practice areas, batting cage, and proposes to provide golf and pitching
instruction. A 100-foot buffer is included per Local Coastal Program
requirements adjacent to the west side of the site to be developed, and
east of the onsite.wetlands associated with the historic Sweetwater River
channel.
Comnatibilitv with Zoning and Plans
The site is designated by the General Plan as Research and Limited
Industrial, with a portion located within the Local Coastal Program area.
The proposed use will require a Local Coastal Program Amendment, and a
City Conditional Use Permit. The industrial and warehouse uses, are uses
allowed within this designation, and automotive and boat sales and
services are allowed with a Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, the
Local Coastal Program Specific Plan states in the Coastal Development
Permit Procedures section that where a public accessway, or open space or
conservation restriction on land is required by the Local Coastal Program
(as is required by the Local Coastal program buffer design standards) each
applicant for a Coastal Development Permit shall record one of the
following legal documents as specified in the conditions of approval:
1. Irrevocable Offer of Dedication
The applicant shall submit a preliminary title report and record an
irrevocable offer to dedicate the access, open space, or conservation
easement or to convey such interest in property in fee the accessway,
~«//
~r
city of ehula vista planning department (may pf
environmental review section . CHULA VISfA
VICINITY MAP
F - ----
-- - -~--~
'!1 ~ l., \
t JJ~~''~.
®.~ ti ~.. !t ~ ~
-~~
S{yF f~'qT
r.
.i ..: .
..~lr. J~
~0 ~~~
I ~--
r~
~¢~~~i~~ ~ fig';( >. ~ ~' "5
~.
~eF~ ~~~ !!~~~t
..
~~3T'e!~ l~afdi ~ l~
~!t r`
Yip ~
` ~~ fj;.~;~ =~
d
S I ~ i
.: f;',~;
RRf11fl~ i~i~f~ ,~
r® t-®~ ~_
t
t~$a t€~}~ p. e~~t; ~~~$~
~°' ~~~~~ If fFd4€ s j~66
i1~~P ~~~`~ 1~ ~i~ ~ ~~
,,~1 ~
a
~~pt . ~3~
F o
+f'f ~~
® m
~ ~ ~ ~ :'}eta
~ ~~,
l;,~ps~~rif~i;~~ ~€~,;;,,
i~~f~j- ~ fps ;!rl.jfll ~
e T SS'ij e#°:~~
+ !1!=~;~ii /
f fi¢=ry~~
~~(¢;~ 3:
jrj~~3~~1
A ~
4
~~...,,
'~~~f~i
1
~ - n
~;-
°~ \ 1""~
`~
1~
C
~ ~.1 ~52~ ~ -P ~MN VIT
° t S r D S fll L
sr c
i. .t -r
~..' ,'
i.
`, ~f' 7
r' , - ,_
~ ~
's
-2-
as described in the permit conditions, free of prior liens or
encumbrances, except for tax liens. This offer can be accepted
within 21 years by a non-profit organization or governmental agency
subject to approval by the executive director of the Coastal
Commission. Until this offer is accepted or until the landowner
allows, the public has no right to use the accessway, provided that
the landowner shall not interfere with established existing public
use.
2. Outright Grant of Fee Interest or Easement
If the project is important in and of itself for public access, open
space, or conservation needs, and the size and scope the proposed
development is such that an out-right conveyance interest is
appropriate, or there is an accepting agency approved by the
Executive Director of the Coastal Commission available to accept the
easement of fee interest, it can be required prior to issuance of the
permit. Until such a grant is accepted or until the landowner
allows, the public has no right to use the accessway, provided that
the landowner shall not interfere with established existing public
use.
The applicant has proposed to grant an easement to the City over the
100-foot buffer area. The purpose of the easement would be for the
protection of the wetland resources as required by the Local Coastal
Program. The easement would also make land available for the City's
Greenbelt, as shown on the General Plan. The Greenbelt area
coincides with the buffer requirements of the Local Coastal Program.
The applicant is also reserving the right to use a portion of the
buffer area for supporting- structures, including approaches, for a
bridge connecting Broadway with the project site. A bridge is not
proposed as part of this project. Additionally, the applicant
reserves the right to use the wetland and/or buffer area for
biological mitigation projects. This use, protection of resources,
is also considered consistent with the wetland and buffer protection.
D
Compliance with the Threshold/Standards Policv
1. Fire/EMS
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and medical units
must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of
the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City
of Chula Yista has indicated that this threshold standard will be
met, since the nearest fire station is 1 mile away and would be
associated with a 3 minute response time. The proposed project will
comply with this Threshold Policy.
-3-
2. Police
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must
respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes or less and
maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5
minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62% of Priority 2
calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time
to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Policy.
3. Traffic
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that all intersections must
operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception
that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours
of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of I-805
are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection
may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour.
Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this
policy. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold
Policy. The applicant will be required to pay standard signal fees
to the City.
4. Parks/Recreation
The Threshold/Standards Policy for Parks and Recreation is 3
acres/1,000 population for projects east of I-805. The Threshold
Standard policy is not applicable to this project site.
5. Drainage
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that storm water flows and
volumes not exceed City Engineer Standards. Individual projects will
provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master
Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project was
preliminarily reviewed by the City's Engineering Department, and no
drainage problems were noted. However, the final grading and
drainage plans will be reviewed by the Engineering Department for
conformance with City standards.
6. Sewer
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that sewage flows and volumes
shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects
will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master
Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The project construction
plans, including infrastructure, will be reviewed by the City
Engineering Department for conformance with these appropriate plans
and standards.
-4-
7. Water
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that adequate storage,
treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently
with planned growth and that water quality standards are not
jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Policy. The applicant has already
begun coordination for water infrastructure plans with Sweetwater
Authority, who supplies water in this area.
E. Identification of Environmental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista determined that the
proposed project could have one or more significant environmental
effects. Specific mitigation measures are required to reduce these
effects to a level of less than significant.
The project now avoids or mitigates the potentially significant
environmental effects previously identified, and the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report will not be required. This Mitigated Negative
Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the
State CEQA Guidelines. Specific mitigation measures have also been set
forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program which is attached as Addendum
..A..
The following impacts have been determined to be potentially significant
and are required to be mitigated to a level of less than significant. A
discussion of each of these potentially significant impacts from the
proposed projects follows.
Earth - Soil erosion and liquefaction could occur at the site during
construction and after development.
Air - The project would incrementally contribute to regionally
significant air quality impacts from project traffic vehicle
emissions.
3. Water
Water consumption at the site would incrementally contribute to the
demand on water resources, a regionally significantly impacted
resource.
4. Plant and Animal Life
Significant sedimentation could occur to the adjacent wetland during
and following development activities.
Lioht and Glare
Lighting of outdoor recreational areas such as this project, could
intrude into nearby residential areas.
-5-
6. Aesthetics
Potential view blockage from residences on the hill to the south of
the site could occur because of the 30-foot high golf ball protective
fence.
Mitioation necessary to avoid significant effects
Specific project mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially
significant environmental impacts identified in the initial study for this
project to a level of less than significant. These mitigation measures
have been made conditions of project approval, as well as requirements of
the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program (Addendum "A").
Earth - Liquefaction and soil erosion impacts can be mitigated to a
level of less than significant by updating the current
soils/geotechnical report (Woodward-Clyde Consultants) and by
implementation of the measures contained in this updated report.
Air - Incremental air quality impacts can be mitigated to a level of
less than significant by adherence to future relevant transportation
management programs required by the City of Chula Vista or APCD.
Water
Incremental impacts to water supply can be mitigated to a level of
less than significant by adherence to any water offset program Chula
Vista has in place at time of building permit issuance, and water
conservation requirements imposed by the water district. The
applicant must obtain a service availability letter from Sweetwater
Authority prior to issuance of the grading permits.
Plant and Animal Life
Sedimentation impacts can be mitigated to a level of less than
significant by inclusion of a drainage swale/detention basin within
the buffer area; or by construction of a silt fence located between
construction and the drainage ditch and/or the Sweetwater River.
5. Lioht and Glare
Lighting on the south side of the site facing the residences, must be
reviewed by the City's design review process to ensure that nuisance
lighting is not permitted. Lighting may be required to be shielded
and redirected downward (at least to a 45 degree angle) to eliminate
direct lighting toward any residences.
Aesthetics
The golf ball protective fence on the north side of the site must be
transparent such as chain link fencing or other "see-through"
material.
-6-
G. Findings of Insignificant Impact
Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project
described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no
environmental impact report needs to be prepared.
1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory.
With mitigation measures implemented, potential biological resources
would be protected, and any impacts avoided. Additionally, the
project would not affect any examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory.
2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental
goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals.
No long-term environmental goals, such as agricultural production,
natural resource habitat preservation or mineral extraction would be
disadvantaged by the project. Additionally, with standard
City-required building measures, and mitigation measures, the project
would be consistent with the City's Threshold Policy.
3. The project has possible effects which are individually limited but
cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, "cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.
Cumulative impacts associated with the project are contribution to
degradation of air quality, consumption of energy and water
resources, and contribution to future traffic congestion and signal
warrants in the project vicinity. With implementation of standard
building requirements and mitigation measures, the project
contribution to these impacts would be reduced to a level of less
than significant.
4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
With implementation of standard building requirements, no indirect
adverse effects would occur to human beings.
-7-
H. Consultation
Individuals and Organizations
City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering
John Lippitt, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Bob Sennett, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building and Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Shauna Stokes, Parks and Recreation Department
Lyle Haynes, Community Development Department
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent: Jerald A. Alford
National Avenue Associates
2445 fifth Avenue, Ste. 400
San Diego, CA 92101-1692
Documents
City of Chula Vista General Plan - 2010
City of Chula Vista Local Coastal Program
City of Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning
Office of Planning and Research Hazardous Materials List
"Geotechnical Investigation, National Avenue Associates Site",
Woodward Clyde Consultants, Dec. 6, 1985
Noise Impact Study, "Town Centre Industrial Complex", Giroux and
Associates, August 19, 1991
Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached-Initial
Study, any comments received on the Initial Study and any comments
received during the public review period for the Negative
Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review
of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning
Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
-8-
Preoarer
The preparer of the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
is Diana Richardson, Community Development Department, City of Chula
Vista, with input from City staff and subconsultants.
Nk
E VIRONM AL REVIEW COORDINATOR
EN 6 (Rev. 12/90)
WPC 4968H
ADDENDUM "A"
Mitigation Monitoring Program
IS-91-50 (B)
This Mitigation Monitoring Program is prepared for the National Avenue
Associates' Fifth Avenue Golf Range/Sports Center project. The legislation
requires public agencies to ensure that adequate mitigation measures are
implemented and monitored on Mitigated Negative Declarations, such as
IS-91-50(8).
AB 3180 requires monitoring of potentially significant and/or significant
environmental impacts. The mitigation monitoring program for this project
ensures adequate implementation of mitigation for the following potentially
significant impacts: soil erosion, liquefaction, air quality, water, plant
and animal life, light and glare, and aesthetics.
Due to the nature of the environmental issues identified, the Mitigation
Compliance Coordinator (MCC), shall be the Environmental Review Coordinator
(ERC) for the City of Chula Vista. It shall be the responsibility of the
applicant to ensure that the conditions of the Mitigation Monitoring Program
are met to the satisfaction of the ERC. Compliance with the mitigation
measures specified in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. IS-91-50(B) shall be
provided to the ERC prior to the issuance of any permits by the City of Chula
Vista. The ERC will thus provide the ultimate verification that the
mitigation measures have been accomplished.
WPC 4969H
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING CHECKLIST
PROJECT NAME: fifth Avenue Golf Range/Sports Center
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue Area
Earth
Mitioation Measure
Update current soils/geotechnical report (WCC), and implement updated
requirements of report which will be consistent with City Grading Ordinance.
Proiect Phase (Proiect Desion• Construction• Post Construction)
Design and Construction
Responsible Partv or Aoencv
Engineering Department
Verification of Completion
Person:
Date:
Comments:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue Area
Air
Mitigation Measure
Adherence to future relevant TDM programs required by City.
Proiect Phase (Pro.iect Design; Construction• Post Construction]
Post Construction
Responsible Partv or Agencv
Planning Department
Verification of Completion
Person:
Date:
Comments:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-1-
Issue Area
Water
Mitigation Measure
Adherence to any water offset program City has in place at time of building
permit issuance, and to any conservation requirements of water district.
Also, service availability letter from water district submitted to City prior
to issuance of grading permits.
Project Phase (Pro.iect Design; Construction: Post Construction
Issuance of building permits; issuance of grading permits
Responsible Partv or A eg ncv
Planning/Building and Housing Department; Engineering Department
Verification of Completion
Person:
Date
Comments:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue Area
Plant/Animal Life
Mitigation Measure
Inclusion of a drainage Swale/detention basin or silt fence in 100-foot buffer
area.
Pro.iect Phase (Pro.iect Desion: Construction: Post Constructionl
Design and Construction
Responsible Partv or Agency
Engineering Department
Verification of Completion
Person:
Date:
Comments:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2-
Issue Area
Light and Glare
Mitigation Measure
Review of lighting design by Design Review; performance standard - lighting to
be shielded and directed downward (at least 45 degree angle).
Pro.iect Phase (Pro.iect Design: Construction: Post Construction)
Design and Construction
Responsible Party or Agency
Planning/Building and Housing Department
Verification of Completion
Person:
Date:
Comments:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue Area
Aesthetics
Mitigation Measure
Golf ball protective fence must be transparent, such as chain link.
Pro.iect Phase (Pro.iect Design; Construction: Post Construction)
Design and Construction
Responsible Party or Agency
Planning/Building and Housing Department
Verification of Completion
Person:
Date:
Comments:
WPC 4971H
-3-