The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2008/06/05 Agenda Packet ~e~lare under penaitY~~\8~~11 ~I&/ Z/O'0 ~mployed by the City of Chula Vista in the. , , Office of the City Clerk and that I posted thiS ~ 11 ~ . ent on the bulletin board accurd"'y l(~ ,ctrequlrements. J . ~3E~~ Signed ty CHUrA VISTA rYetl Cheryl Cox, Mayor Rudy Ramirez, Councilmember David R. Garcia, City Manager John McCann, Councilmember Ann Moore, City Attorney Jerry R. Rindone, Councilrnember Donna Norris, Interim City Clerk Steve Castaneda, Counci!member JOINT WORKSHOP OF THE CITY COUNCIL, GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION, AND PLANNING COMMISSION June 5, 2008 6:00 P.M. Chula Vista Police Headqumiers Community Meeting Room 315 Fourth Avenue CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, Rindone, and Mayor Cox Growth Management Oversight Commissioners: Bazze!, Canaris, Clayton, Hall, Jones, Krogh, Palma, Sutton, Chair O'Neill Planning Commissioners: Bensoussan, Clayton, Felber, Moctezuma, Spethman, Vinson, and Chair Tripp PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE PUBLIC HEARING - City Council, GMOC, Planning Commission The following item has been advertised as a public hearing as required by law. If you wish to speak on the item, please fill out a "Request fa Speak" form and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. I. REVIEW i\ND CONSIDERA nON OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION'S 2008 ANNUAL REPORT Each year, the Growth Management Oversight Commission submits its Annual Report to the Planning Commission and City Council regarding compliance with threshold standards for eleven Quality-of-Life indicators. The 2008 Annual Report covers the period from July 1,2006 through June 30, 2007; identifies current issues in the second half of 2007 and early 2008; and assesses any threshold compliance concerns looking forward over the next five years. The report discusses each threshold in terms of current compliance, issues, and corresponding recommendations. (Planning and Building Director) Page 1 - CClGMOCfPC Agenda http://wwVI' . chul avistaca,gov lune 5, 2008 .. . ". Staff recommendation: The Planning Commission adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION OF THE PLAt'\JNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2008 GMOC ANNUAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDING ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2008 GMOC ANNUAL REPORT, AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO UNDERTAKE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AS PRESENTED IN THE STAFF RESPONSES AND PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SUMMARY PUBLIC COMMENTS - Council, GMOC, Planning Commission Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Council/GMOC/Planning Commission on any subject matter within the Council/GMOC/Planning Commission's jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda, State law generally prohibits the Council/GMOC/Planning CommissionFom discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Council/GMOC/Planning Commission may schedule the topic for fillure discussion or refer the mailer to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes. CLOSED SESSION - City Conncil The Council will reconvene immediately following Closed Session to announce any actions taken in Closed Session, in accordance with the Ralph M, Brown Act (Government Code 54957, 7). 2. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT PURSUANT TO GOVERi\TMENT CODE SECTION 54957 City Attorney 3. CONFERENCE WITH NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 City Negotiators: City Council and City Attorney ADJOURNMENT The Growth Management Oversight Commission and the Planning Commission adjourn to their respective Regular Meetings and the City Council to a Regular Meeting on June 10, 2008 at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. Page 2 - CC/GMOC/PC Agenda htto ://w,vVl'. ch u lavistaca. gOY June 5. 2008 In compliance with the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service request such accommodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and .fzve days for scheduled services and activities. Please contact the City Clerk for specific information at (619) 691-5041 or Telecommunications Devicesfor the Deaf (TDD) at (619) 585-5655. California Relay Service is also available for the hearing impaired Page 3 - Council Agenda htto :/i I,\'ww. C hul a 'v'lstaca. gov June 5, 2008 I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Chula Vista in the Office of the City Clerk and that I posted this document on the bulletin board according tli \ , I Brown Act requirements.. ~ \, i ~ 21~O/o~ SigneQY~ ~~~; - - -- CI1Y OF CHULA VISTA Cheryl Cox, Mayor Rudy Ramirez, Councilmember David R. Garcia, City Manager John McCann, Councilmember Ann Moore, City Attorney Jerry R. Rindone, Councilmember Donna Norris, Interim City Clerk Steve Castaneda, Councilmember JOINT WORKSHOP OF THE CITY COUNCIL, GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION, AND PLANNING COMMISSION June 5, 2008 6:00 P.M. Chula Vista Police Headquarters Community Meeting Room 315 Fourth Avenue CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, Rindone, and Mayor Cox Growth Management Oversight Commissioners: Bazzel, Canaris, Clayton, Hall, Jones, Krogh, Palma, Sutton, Chair O'Neill Planning Commissioners: Bensoussan, Clayton, Felber, Moctezuma, Spethman, Vinson, and Chair Tripp PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE PUBLIC HEARING - City Council, GMOC, Planning Commission The following item has been advertised as a public hearing as required by law. If you wish to speak on the item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. 1. REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION'S 2008 ANNUAL REPORT Each year, the Growth Management Oversight Commission submits its Annual Report to the Planning Commission and City Council regarding compliance with threshold standards for eleven Quality-of-Life indicators. The 2008 Annual Report covers the period from July I, 2006 through June 30, 2007; identifies current issues in the second half of 2007 and early 2008; and assesses any threshold compliance concerns looking forward over the next five years. The report discusses each threshold in terms of current compliance, issues, and corresponding recommendations. (Planning and Building Director) Page 1 - CC/GMOCIPC Agenda httD ://v.,'Ww .chulavistaca. gOY June 5, 2008 Staff recommendation: The Planning Commission adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2008 GMOC ANNUAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDING ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2008 GMOC ANNUAL REPORT, AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO UNDERTAKE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AS PRESENTED IN THE STAFF RESPONSES AND PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SUMMARY PUBLIC COMMENTS - Council, GMOC, Planning Commission Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Council/GMOC/Planning Commission on any subject matter within the Council/GMOC/Planning Commission's jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits the Council/GMOC/Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Council/GMOC/Planning Commission may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT The Growth Management Oversight Commission and the Planning Commission adjourn to their respective Regular Meetings and the City Council to a Regular Meeting on June 10, 2008 at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. In compliance with the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service request such accommodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and jive days for scheduled services and activities. Please contact the City Clerk for specific information at (619) 691-5041 or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDD) at (619) 585-5655. California Relay Service is also available for the hearing impaired. Page 2 - CCIGMOCIPC Agenda htto:,i/WWw.chulavistaca.20V June 5, 2008 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ;:$Vjf:.. el1Y OF CHULA VISTA June 5, 2008, Itern---L- SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOPIMEETING OF THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCn. PLANNING COMMISSION AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: Report: Review and Consideration of the Growth Management Oversight Commission's (GMOC) 2008 Annual Report. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2008 GMOC ANNUAL REPORT, AND RECOMMENDING ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2008 GMOC ANNUAL REPORT, AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO UNDERTAKE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AS PRESENTED IN THE STAFF RESPONSES AND PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SUMMARY SUBMITTED BY: Acting Director of Planning City Manager REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES D NO 0 BACKGROUND Each year, the GMOC submits its Annual Report to the Planning Commission and City Council regarding compliance with threshold standards for eleven Quality-of-Life indicators. The 2008 Annual Report covers the period from July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007; identifies current issues in the second half of 2007 and early 2008; and assesses any threshold compliance concerns looking forward over the next five years. The report discusses each threshold in terms of current 1-1 J1llle 5, 2008, Item---1-- Page 2 of6 compliance, issues, and corresponding recommendations. A summary table of lbe GMOC's recommendations and staff's proposed implementing actions is included as Attachment 1. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The GMOC Annual Report is exempt per Section 15061(b)3 of the State CEQA Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION I) That the Planning Commission: Adopt the Resolution accepting lbe 2008 GMOC Annual Report, and recommending acceptance by the City Council; and 2) That lbe City Council: Adopt lbe Resolution accepting lbe 2008 GMOC Annual Report and directing the City Manager to undertake actions necessary to implement report recommendations as presented in lbe Staff Responses and Proposed Implementing Actions Summary (Attachment I). BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission will provide comments and recommendations at the workshop. DISCUSSION The 2008 GMOC Annual Report addresses compliance with threshold standards for eleven quality of life indicators covered in lbe City's Growth Management Program. Presented below is a summary of findings regarding threshold compliance and a summary of key issues with respect to threshold compliance. The Annual Report (Attachment 2) provides additional background information and a more detailed explanation of findings and discussion/recommendations. 1. Summary of Findings The following table summarizes lbe GMOC's threshold compliance findings for lbe 2008 GMOC Annual Review, including the current July 1, 2006 - June 30, 2007 review period, and looking forward at lbe potential for future non-compliance during lbe period of 2008 through the year 2012. Current and Anticipated Threshold Compliance Not In Com Hance Libraries Police (PII - Urgent) Traffic Sewer In Com Hance Potential Non-Com Hance Libraries Police (PII - Urgent) Traffic Fiscal Schools Parks & Recreation (Facilities) Air Quality Drainage Water Fire/EMS 1-2 June 5, 2008, Itern~ Page 3 of 6 2. Summary of Key Issues Thresholds Not in Comnliance or With the Potential for Future Non-Comnliance Libraries The Libraries threshold standard states that library facilities shall not fall below the citywide ratio of 500 gross square feet (GSF) per 1,000 population. If it does, the implementation measure for Libraries requires City Council to "formally adopt and fund tactics to bring the library system into conformance. Construction or other actual solution shall be scheduled to commence within three years." For four consecutive years, the threshold standard has not been met. The City's current ratio is 448 GSF of library facilities per 1,000 population, a deficit of 52 GSF per 1,000 population. The City had been moving forward with plans to construct a 31,200 square-foot library in Rancho del Rey, per the 1998 Library Master Plan, which calls for a 30,000 square-foot full service regional library in Rancho del Rey. Property was purchased in March 1989, and a designlbuild agreement was entered into on December 13, 2005. However, due to inter-fund reallocating in the Public Facilities DIF, the Libraries component was left with insufficient funds to construct the Rancho del Rey facility. Until City Council identifies and approves funding to complete the Rancho del Rey library project, the City's population will continue to grow, and the GSF deficit will continue to increase. Completion of the Rancho del Library would bring the GSFIl,OOO population to at least 500, bringing the Libraries threshold standard back into compliance. Without the Rancho del Rey library, there is a lack of conveniently located library facilities to serve the east side of Chula V ista, and the most significant influencing factor on library use is proximity of the facility to the user. The GMOC recommends that the City Council direct the City Manager to prepare a specific action plan and timeline for the replenishment of the Libraries component of the PFDIF and construction of the Rancho del Rey library at the earliest possible time. Staff Response: Library staff will continue to look for opportunities to advance the Rancho del Rey project, as well as seeking other opportunities to provide services to the eastern side of our city. Construction timing will be dependent upon Council prioritization of PFDIF expenditures. Police Priority II - Urgent Response Calls for Service - The Police threshold standard for Priority II - Urgent Response Calls for Service states that police units shall respond to 57% of the Priority II urgent calls within 7 minutes, and shall maintain an average response time of 7 minutes and 30 seconds or less (measured annually). This year's average response time of II minutes and 18 seconds for 43.4% of the Priority II calls did not comply with the threshold standard. Although it was faster than last year, it is the tenth consecutive year that the Priority II threshold standard has not been met. 1-3 June5,2008,~ern~ Page 4 of 6 The 2007 GMOC Annual Report recommended that the Police Department be directed to implement an action plan addressing the general decline in performance since 1995 relative to meeting the GMOC threshold for Priority II calls. Such an action plan has not been completed, and non-compliance with the threshold standard still needs to be addressed. The GMOC recommends that the City Council direct the City Manager to have the Police Department complete and implement an action plan by fall 2008 that addresses the general decline in performance relative to meeting the GMOC threshold standard for Priority II calls. Staff Response: Given the current budget situation, the Police Department does not anticipate the necessary resources being available to meet the threshold standard for Priority I1 CFS. The Department recently cut 10 officer positions to address city budget shortfalls. A substantial number of additional sworn officers would be necessary to meet the threshold standard for Priority I1 urgent response calls. Traffic The threshold standard for Traffic specifies that Level of Service (LOS) "c" or better, as measured by observed average travel speed on all signalized arterial segments, should be maintained, except that during peak hours a LOS "D" can occur for no more than two hours of the day. During the period under review, three segments did not comply with the threshold standard. The three segments are defined as; Heritage Road (Telegraph Canyon Road - Olympic Parkway); La Media Road (Telegraph Canyon Road - Olympic Parkway); and Otay Lakes Road (East H Street - Telegraph Canyon Road.) During the period under review, the SR-125 toll road was not yet open. The toll road opened in November 2007, and City engineering staff is in the process of collecting data to see how the addition of SR-125 has affected the three segments that do not comply with the threshold standard. Engineering staff believes the addition of SR-125 will unburden the non-compliant segments enough to bring them back into compliance with the threshold standard. They will report their findings to Council in June 2008. The GMOC recommends that City engineering staff provide recommendations that will mitigate non-compliance if post SR-125 traffic studies indicate that the segments continue to be non- compliant with the Traffic threshold standard. Staff Response: As of May 2008, City engineering staff is compiling post-SR-125 traffic counts in various locations throughout the City and will be presenting a report with findings at the June 17, 2008 City Council meeting. Staff is also implementing revised traffic signal timing plans at those non-compliant locations. Sewer The Sewer threshold standard states that sewage flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards (75% of design capacity for pipes larger than 12 inches in diameter). During the period under review, a section of the Industrial Boulevard sewer line exceeded the 75% capacity; therefore, the threshold finding is non-compliance. The City's comprehensive Infrastructure Flow Monitoring Program, based on data obtained from the 2005 Wastewater Master Plan, indicated that the Industrial Boulevard sewer line near the June 5, 2008, Item-L Page 5 of6 intersection of Industrial Boulevard and Main Street exceeded the established threshold, and Wastewater Engineering staff determined that the line may need to be upsized. The City is in the process of completing design plans for the construction of improvements on the Main Street Trunk sewer line, which will improve the downstream flow condition near the intersection of Main Street and Industrial Boulevard. City staff has performed hydraulic studies on both the Industrial Boulevard sewer line and the Main Street Trunk sewer line. Through that analysis, staff has determined that, before upsizing the Industrial Boulevard sewer line, it would be more prudent to first complete the required improvements on Main Street (scheduled to be finished by the end of the calendar year), then re-evaluate the Industrial Boulevard sewer constraints. In the interim, staff will tentatively schedule the Industrial Boulevard sewer improvements for inclusion in the CIP program for next fiscal year, pending the outcome of the analysis. and a Capital Improvement Project (CIP) has been approved to rectify the constraint next fiscal year. The GMOC supports Engineering Wastewater staffs plan to complete improvements to the Main Street Trunk sewer line and re-evaluate the Industrial Boulevard sewer line capacity after those improvements are complete. And, to schedule the Industrial Boulevard sewer improvements for inclusion in the CIP program for next fiscal year, pending the outcome of the analysis. Staff Response: Plans for the required improvements on Main Street are 90% complete as of June 2008. Upon completion of these improvements later this year, the Industrial Boulevard Sewer constraints will be re-evaluated. Staff is tentatively scheduling the Industrial Boulevard Sewer improvements for inclusion in the eIP program for next fiscal year, pending the outcome of the analysis. Thresholds Currently in Compliance GMOC recommendations, along with staff responses and proposed implementation actions for the threshold standards currently in compliance (Fiscal, Air Quality, Water, Drainage, Parks & Recreation, Fire, Schools), are outlined in Attachment I. 3. GMOC Workshop Retreat On October 20, 2007, the GMOC held its second workshop retreat, where the commissioners conducted an informal discussion on the evaluation of existing and potential future thresholds, as well as general issues pertaining to the GMOC. Section 4.1 of the GMOC report contains a summary of the GMOC'S workshop retreat. 4. 2007 Council Referrals On August 2, 2007 at the joint City Council/Planning CommissionlGMOC meeting, Council proposed one referral to GMOC to review and respond to in its 2008 GMOC Annual Report. The Fiscal referral requested that a report describing the implications of expenditures be provided to Council whenever funding is shifted from one project to another. The referral was reviewed by the GMOC and is included in the 2008 Annual Report. 1-5 June 5, 2008, Item-L Page6of6 5. Conclusions To assist Council in evaluating and acting upon the GMOC's recommendations, a concise summary of the GMOC'S recommendations and corresponding staff responses and proposed implementing actions is presented in Attachment 1. Staff recommends that Council direct staff to undertake implementing actions, as outlined in the right-hand column of Attachment 1. The GMOC 2008 Annual Report is included as Attachment 2. Attachment 3 consists of Appendices to the GMOC Report, including: Public Comments (Appendix A); the Growth Forecast (Appendix B); and Threshold Compliance Questionnaires (Appendix C). DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has determined that since the GMOC Annual Report is not site specific, the 500-foot notification rule found in California Code Regulations Section I 8704.2(a)(l) is not applicable to this decision. FISCAL IMPACT None at this time. As specified follow-up actions are brought forward to the City Council, fiscal analysis of these actions will be provided as applicable. ATTACHMENTS I - 2008 GMOC Staff Responses and Implementing Actions Summary 2 - 2008 GMOC Annual Report, including Chairperson's Cover Memo 3 - 2008 GMOC Annual Report Appendices A-C 1-6 2008 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION (GMOC) RECOMMENDATIONS / IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SUMMARY GMOC RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Fiscal 3.1.1 A comprehensive plan for repayment of funds needs to be established for inter-fund reallocating that occurs within the Public Facilities DIF Fund. 2. Air Qualitv ~ 3.2.1 In order to comply with CVMC 20.04, the City needs to inform applicants of this requirement in the early stages of the development process, and make sure building inspectors verify installation of these systems during final inspections. I -l 3.2.2 1) The City shall continue to vigorously implement its Carbon Dioxide (C02) Reduction Plan, Energy Strategy and Climate Change Actions. ~ ~ ~ ~ "") = ~ ~ ~ -3 .... 1. STAFF RESPONSES & PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS Fiscal 3.1.1 Although the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee includes numerous projects, it is managed as a pooled fund. A comprehensive cash flow analysis of the fund has been developed and all remaining PFDIF projects have been incorporated into fee structure. Revenue projections through buildout indicate the current fee structure is sufficient to fund all remaining projects in the PFDIF program. 2. Air Qualitv 3.2.1 This is currently being enforced. Building inspectors and plans examiners have received training and applicants are being informed at plan check. It is now a plan check correction item. 3.2.2 1) On April 1, 2008 City Council adopted all seven recommendations presented by the City's Climate Change Working Group in order to further reduce the community's greenhouse gas emissions or "carbon footprint." Staff is now working to develop detailed implementation plans for the seven measures which will promote alternative fuel/hybrid vehicle use; establish a green building standard for new construction and major remodels; expand renewable energy and energy efficiency opportunities for residents and businesses; require business energy assessments; promote "smart growth" around trolley stations; and encourage the use of water-wise landscaping and irrigation throughout the community. Page 1 of 6 2008 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION (GMOC) RECOMMENDATIONS J IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SUMMARY ~ GMOC RECOMMENDATIONS STAFF RESPONSES & PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS 2) The City Council, as it follows up with the City's Climate 2) Staff has historically used the IClEI Cities for Change Working Group, shall develop options for devising Climate Protection protocol and software to an air quality Threshold Standard that would serve as an quantify Chula Vista's annual greenhouse gas appropriate measuring device. emissions. Staff is currently working with IClEI, the California Air Resources Board and the California Climate Action Registry to develop a more robust local government emissions protocol. With the new protocol, staff will be able to more accurately track and report the City's carbon emissions, and define a basis for developing a new air quality standard. 3. Sewer 3. Sewer 3.3.1 That in 2008/09, the City should complete the required 3.3.1 Plans for the required improvements on Main improvements on the Main Street Trunk sewer line; upon Street are 90% complete as of June 2008. Upon completion, the Industrial Boulevard sewer line constraints completion of these improvements later this year, should be re-evaluated. Staff should tentatively schedule the the Industrial Boulevard Sewer constraints will be Industrial Boulevard Sewer improvements for inclusion in the re-evaluated. Staff is tentatively scheduling the CIP program for next fiscal year, pending the outcome of the Industrial Boulevard Sewer improvements for analysis. inclusion in the CIP program for next fiscal year, pending the outcome of the analysis. 3.3.2 By fall 2009, City Council should adopt a plan to substantially 3.3.2 Staff has been coordinating the effort to evaluate all begin the process of increasing additional treatment capacity available options that would enable the City Council that will be needed by 2017. This will allow the time necessary to make an informed decision on the best course of to plan and deliver the needed capacity or facility. action. Staff will bring an action plan for Council consideration prior to the fall of 2009. 4. Water 4. Water 3.4.1 That the City continue to work with Otay Water District and 3.4.1 Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District will Sweetwater Authority to maintain and track future track future development in coordination with the development in order to continue to meet the water availability City and work with the City to achieve this goal. threshold. I 00 Page 2 of 6 2008 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION (GMOC) RECOMMENDATIONS / IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SUMMARY ~ GMOC RECOMMENDATIONS STAFF RESPONSES & PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS 3.4.2 That the City continue to support Otay Water District and 3.4.2 Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District Sweetwater Authority and their water emergency policies. continue to pursue and maintain emergency water supply needs consistent with the recommendations of the San Diego County Water Authority. 5. Libraries 5. Libraries 3.5.1 That the City Council direct the City Manager to prepare a 3.5.1 Library staff will continue to look for opportunities specific plan and timeline for the replenishment of the to advance the Rancho del Rey project, as well as Libraries component of the PFDIF, and construction of the seeking other opportunities to provide services to Rancho del Rey library at the earliest possible time. the eastern side of our City. Construction timing will be dependent upon Council prioritization of 3.5.2 1) Assess ultimate future library needs based upon the PFDIF expenditures (see also response 3.1.1). increased capacity from the City's updated General Plan, and accordingly update the Library Facilities Master Plan, and the 3.5.2 1 )Upon adoption of the FYOB-09 City budget, Library threshold standards reference. staff will secure the services of a consultant for the update of the Library Facilities Master Plan. The Master Plan update will consider the latest trends for establishing baseline facility and service thresholds and recommend how to effectively achieve the thresholds. 2) Actively pursue planning for a new Eastern Urban Center 2) The City and EUC developer are actively planning branch library in an amount sufficient to address the new the development of the EUC, which will include an General Plan build-out population needs. appropriately-sized library branch at the heart of the urban core. It is estimated that the library could be com Dieted in the 2011-2012 timeframe. 6. Drainage 6. DrainaQe 3.6.1 The City should continue to participate in the Regional Channel 3.6.1 The Regional Channel Maintenance Workgroup Maintenance Workgroup subcommittee, as the group's subcommittee has received statements of support consultant continues to work with environmental resource from RWQCB, ACOE, Fish and Wildlife, and agencies in streamlining a process for obtaining environmental Coastal Commission. Fish and Games counsel I CD Page 3 of 6 2008 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION (GMOC) RECOMMENDATIONS / IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SUMMARY ~ GMOC RECOMMENDATIONS STAFF RESPONSES & PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS permits. has reviewed the Permitting Guide and is submitting minor comments to EDAW for inclusion in the Guide. EDAW will then provide a final white paper, and the final Permitting Guide to the Workgroup. 3.6.2 Through local, state and or federal monies, the City should be 3.6.2 The City continues to seek funding from state prepared to fund any shortfalls associated with construction of and/or federal agencies to augment local funds. new improvements and/or improvements to existing drainage facilities. 7. Parks and Recreation 7. Parks and Recreation 3.7.2. 1) As part of the Top-to-Bottom review, the Parks & Recreation 3.7.2.1) Staff concurs with proposed amended language. threshold standard should be amended to read: "Three acres of park land, with appropriate facilities, shall be provided per 1,000 residents for new development Citywide." 2) A City policy should be adopted that requires that all new 2) Staff will look into the feasibility and practicality parks developed with funding from new residential growth of being able to do this. west of Interstate 805 be developed within this area. 3.7.3 The City shall develop new models and approaches for 3.7.3 The draft update to the Parks and Recreation meeting recreational land and facility needs in developed Master Plan includes a new chapter on park delivery western Chula Vista, and a plan for acquisition and funding of in western Chula Vista that addresses new models land and facilities. and approaches. 3.7.4 A draft of the updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan shall 3.7.4 The draft Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update be made available for review by the GMOC as part of its next will be made available to the GMOC as soon as a (2009\ annual review cycle. _ public draft becomes available. 8. Police 8. Police 3.8.2 The City Council shall direct the City Manager to have the Police 3.8.2 Given the current budget situation, the Police Department does not anticipate the necessary Department complete and implement an action plan which ....., . .. .. fh.. I ~ o Page 4 of 6 2008 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION (GMOC) RECOMMENDATIONS / IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SUMMARY GMOC RECOMMENDATIONS addresses the decline in performance relative to meeting the GMOC threshold for Priority II calls, by fall 2008. 3.8.3 The Police Department shall closely monitor performance with regards to Priority 1 calls with response times over 10 minutes. 9. Fire I EmerQencv Medical Services ~ 3.9.1 The Fire Facilities Master Plan and Advance Life Support Study should be brought to City Council for review and action during the upcoming GMOC review cycle so that any fire and emergency response issues related to future growth can be addressed. I ~ ~ 3.9.2 The Fire Chief shall furnish the GMOC with data on response and calls for service after the transition to San Diego dispatch. 10. Traffic 3.10.1 City Engineering staff shall provide recommendations that will mitigate non-compliance if post-SR-125 traffic studies indicate that the three segments continue to be non-compliant with the traffic Threshold Standard. STAFF RESPONSES & PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS resources being available to meet the threshold standard for Priority II CFS. The Department recently cut 10 officer positions to address city budget shortfalls. A substantial number of additional sworn officers would be necessary to meet the threshold standard for Priority II urgent response calls. 3.8.3 The Police Department will continue to closely monitor Priority 1 calls with response times over 10 minutes, and will annually report this information to the GMOC. 9. Fire I EmerQencv Medical Services 3.9.1 The Fire Facility Master Plan has been completed. The Fire Department will be working with the City Manager to develop an implementation strategy. The Fire Department and City Manager will report back to the GMOC any significant developments. 3.9.2 This data will be furnished to the GMOC when the transition to San Diego Dispatch has been completed and enough call for service volume can be analvzed for comparison purposes. 10. Traffic 3.10.1 As of May 2008, City engineering staff is compiling post SR-125 traffic counts in various locations throughout the City and will be presenting a report with findings at the June 17, 2008 City Council meeting. Staff is also implementing revised traffic signal timing plans at those non- compliant locations. Page 5 of 6 2008 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION (GMOC) RECOMMENDATIONS I IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SUMMARY GMOC RECOMMENDATIONS STAFF RESPONSES & PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS 3.10.2 Contracts should continue to be awarded based on 3.10.2 The City has awarded three contracts based on the recommendations in response to the Pavement Management recommendations of the Pavement Management System. System and is preparing to award other contracts. ~ I ~ '" Page 6 of 6 CITY OF CHULA VISTA GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 GMOC ANNUAL REPORT Threshold Review Period 7/1/06 to 6/30/07 Commission Members Kevin O'Neill, Chairman (Development) Joanne Clayton, Vice Chair (Planning Commission Representative) David W. Krogh (Sweetwater/Bonita) Stanley Canaris (Education) Steve Palma (Southwest) Russ Hall (Center City) Duane Bazzel (Environmental) Tim P. Jones (Business) Eric Sutton (Southeast) Staff Kim Vander Bie, Growth Management Coordinator Rabbia Phillip, Management Assistant City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 (619) 691-5101 http://www.chulavistaca.gov/ June 5, 2008 Approved by the Planning Commission (Resolution No. PCM 08-04) and City Council (Resolution No. 2008-_) on June 5, 2008 ATTACHMENT 2 2008 GMOC Annual Report June 2008 1-13 GMOC Chair Cover Memo DATE: June 5, 2008 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Councii Members of the Planning Commission City of Chula Vista FROM: Kevin O'Neil, Chairman Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) SUBJECT: 2008 GMOC Annual Report (July 1,2006 to June 30, 2007, to the Current Time and Five-Year Forecast) The GMOC is appreciative of the time and professional expertise given by the staff of various City departments, as well as the school districts, water districts, and Air Pollution Control District in helping us complete this year's annual report. The comprehensive written and verbal reports presented to the GMOC illustrate the commitment of these dedicated professionals to serving the Chula Vista community. Special thanks to Rabbia Phillip, Kim Vander Bie, Stan Donn and Ed Batchelder who provided direct staff support to the Commission. I would like to recognize the commissioners of the GMOC: Vice-Chair Joanne Clayton-Eason, Stanley Canaris, Steve Palma, David Krogh, Duane Bazzel, Tim P. Jones, Russ Hall, and Eric Sutton. This dedicated and diverse team of citizens read numerous reports, listened to detailed presentations, and participated in hours of thoughtful and lively discussion about the impact of development on the "quality of life" in Chula Vista. Over the last few years the GMOC has been in the lead identifying ways we can become more responsive to the community and effective in our message to Council. The most important aspects of those changes have been: . Holding an annual retreat; . Holding (regular) public workshops; . Focusing greater attention on western Chula Vista; and, . Having greater future vision, by dealing with current issues and looking critically at the next five-year time period. In December, 2005 the new Growth Management Element of the General Plan was adopted and drafts of the updated Growth Management Ordinance and Program Guidelines Document are being completed and moving forward for City Council adoption sometime in 2009, and will be available for review by the GMOC in its next cycle. Chula Vista had been one of the fastest growing cities in the region and the state, and the City has done a remarkable job in providing the facilities and services necessary to accommodate this development. This is a testament to the current growth management program, and all the individual actions that have taken place. The current economic downturn has brought growth to a standstill. Just as the blistering pace of growth earlier in the decade brought challenges to managing the impacts of that growth, the sudden cessation of building brings a whole new set of challenges. The latter is more difficult because growth provides the fees that allow us to maintain our quality of life. The absence of growth also means the absence of fees so there is 2008 Annual Report 1 1-14 June 2008 GMOC Chair Cover Memo June 5, 2008 little or no money to complete or start needed infrastructure. One of the thresholds we will highlight this evening is a perfect example and presents a conundrum in how to handle it. The GMOC ordinance has, at its core, the ability to cause a halt to the issuance of building permits when one or more of the thresholds are not met. This moratorium would presumably remain in effect until the threshold was brought back into compliance. The Libraries threshold is chronically deficient and the solution is the fees that growth will bring in, but cannot be realized under a moratorium. Police, Priority II-Urgent Response Calls, also continues to be out of compliance. As part of the "Top-to-Bottom" Comprehensive Growth Management Program Review that the GMOC is currently in the midst of, the GMOC will be proposing a modification to the "moratorium" provision, which currently applies to Police, Fire, Traffic and Parks & Recreation. Please see page 37 for an explanation of the change that will be proposed at a later date. Seven of the eleven quality of life indicator threshold standards were determined by the GMOC to be in compliance, including: . Fiscal . Air Quality . Water . Drainage . Parks and Recreation . Fire/EMS . Schools The four found to be out of compliance include: . Libraries . Police . Traffic . Sewer The following report includes a more detailed presentation of the eleven threshold standards, identified issues, findings, and recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. The GMOC held its second annual workshop retreat in October to informally discuss existing GMOC threshold standards and potential modifications to some of those standards. During the review cycle, the GMOC worked on the top-to-bottom review and adjustments to threshoids, as time allowed. In response to growth on the west side, the GMOC will be recommending an attainable threshold for park land on the west side of Chula Vista. There was one City Council referral from the 2007 review cycle, which was considered and evaluated as part of this year's review. 2008 Annual Report 2 1-15 June 2008 City of Chula Vista GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 Annual Report Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS GMOC CHAIR COVER MEMO REPORT PREFACE - QUALITY OF LIFE: A BROAD OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION 1.1 Threshold Standards 1.2 The Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) 1.3 GMOC 2008 Annual Review Process 1.4 Growth Forecast 1.5 Report Organization 1.0 2.0 THRESHOLD COMPLIANCE SUMMARY THRESHOLD COMPLIANCE DISCUSSIONS 3.1 Fiscal 3.1.1 Maintenance of Development Impact Fees (DIF) Air Quality 3.2.1 Chula Vista Development Procedures Regarding Federal, State and Regional Air Quality Regulations and Programs City Programs for Air Quality Improvement 3.2.2 Sewer 3.3.1 3.3.2 Water 3.4.1 Meeting Water Demands 3.4.2 Emergency Water Supply Libraries 3.5.1 Library Building Plan 3.5.2 Updating the Library Master Plan Drainage 3.6.1 Maintenance of Existing Drainage 3.6.2 Funding for Future Facilities Required to Accommodate 5-Year Growth Forecast Parks and Recreation 3.7.1 Threshold Compliance 3.7.2 Threshold Standard Change 3.7.3 Providing Park and Recreation Facilities in Western Chula Vista 3.7.4 Parks and Recreation Master Plan Police 3.8.1 3.8.2 3.8.3 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 2008 Annual Report Non-Compliant Industrial Boulevard Sewer Line Long-Term Treatment Capacity Priority I Threshold Findings Non-Compliance of Priority II Threshold Priority I Calls Taking Longer Than 10 Minutes 3 1-16 1-2 3-4 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 8 g 9 9 10 10-11 11-13 13 13-14 14-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19 19-20 20-21 21 21-22 22 22 23 24 24-25 25 26 27 28-29 30 June 2008 4.0 5.0 3.9 Fire and Emergency Medical Services 3.9.1 Reporting Period Consistency 3.9.2 Fire Facilities Master Plan and Advance Life Support Study 3.9.3 Outsourcing Dispatch System to San Diego 3.10 Traffic 3.10.1 Non-Compliance of Threshold Standard 3.10.2 Maintenance and Rehabilitation of City Streets 3.11 Schools 3.11.1 School District Accomplishments 3.12 Other Topics 3.12.1 Comprehensive Growth Management Program ("Top-to-Bottom") Review 3.12.2 Public Comments 3.12.3 Parks and Recreation 30 31 31-32 32 32-33 33 33-34 34 34-35 35 35-39 39 39 POTENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CHANGES 4.1 GMOC Retreat and Informal Discussion Session 4.1.1 Fiscal 4.1.2 Air Quality 4.1.3 Sewer 4.1.4 Water 4.1.5 Libraries 4.1.6 Drainage 4.1.7 Parks and Recreation 4.1.8 Police 4.1.9 Fire 4.1.10 Traffic 4.1.11 Schools 4.2 2007 Planning Commission/City Council Referrals 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 41 41 41 41 41-42 42 42 APPENDICES 5.1 Appendix A - Pubic Comments 5.2 Appendix B - Growth Forecast 5.3 Appendix C - Threshold Compliance Questionnaires 43 43 43 43 2008 Annua/ Report 4 1-17 June 2008 Report Preface - Quality of Life: A Broad Overview The Growth Management Oversight Commission's (GMOC) principal task is to assess the impacts of growth on the community's quality of life, and to recommend corrective actions in areas where the City has the ability to act and/or can make a difference. This is an important and vital service. No other city in the region has an independent citizen body such as the GMOC to provide this kind of report card to an elected body. The GMOC takes seriously its role of monitoring the impacts of growth and reporting to the City Council. The GMOC membership also believes that it has a responsibility to express concerns over issues that may not be part of the formal GMOC purview. For instance, maintenance and upkeep of necessary infrastructure for the City potentially impacts the quality of life for both current and future residents; increased costs of deferred maintenance could consume a significant amount of budget resources, thereby requiring cuts that may impact services, such as parks and libraries. The GMOC finds it important for this issue to be raised so that the City Council and the community have a full perspective regarding the City's quality of life. At the same time, the GMOC has tried to avoid duplication of effort, being mindful of the roles of other boards and commissions in taking the lead in addressing various types of issues, and to focus on its main priorities. Despite the City's recent budget challenges, the GMOC believes the overall quality of life in Chuia Vista remains good. However, it will be a test to maintain and improve the quality of life in the coming years as the City's limited resources will be needed to prevent degradation of City roads and facilities, and to construct new facilities, such as libraries and fire stations. The master-planned communities of eastern Chula Vista continue to be desirable and relatively affordable places to live, as home values have decreased significantly and foreclosed properties have escalated in recent months. The Otay Ranch Town Center is bringing in tax revenue and providing both residents and visitors from neighboring communities a pleasant venue for shopping, dining and entertainment. Initiatives for the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) and University Park and Research Center also continue to progress. In western Chula Vista and the Bayfront, the prospects for redevelopment give rise to opportunities for physical improvements to be realized, as they have in the east. The 2005 General Plan includes an updated Growth Management Element that provides a framework for continuing the evolution of the City's Growth Management Program. A Growth Management Ordinance and Growth Management Program Guidelines are being revised and will move forward for City Council adoption in late 2008 or early 2009. 2008 Annual Report 5 1-18 June 2008 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Threshold Standards In November 1987, the City Council adopted the original Threshold Standards Policy for Chula Vista, establishing "quality-of-life" indicators for eleven public facility and service topics. These include: Fiscal, Air Quality, Sewer, Water, Libraries, Drainage, Parks & Recreation, Police, Fire/ Emergency Services, Traffic, and Schools. The Policy addresses each topic in terms of a goal, objective(s), a "threshold" or standard, and implementation measures. Adherence to these citywide standards is intended to preserve and enhance both the environment and residents' quality of life as growth occurs. 1.2 The Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) To provide an independent, annual, citywide Threshold Standards compliance review, the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) was created. It is composed of nine members representing each of the City's four major geographic areas; a member of the Planning Commission; and a cross-section of interests, including education, environment, business, and development. The GMOC's review is structured around three timeframes: 1. A fiscal year cycle - to accommodate City Council review of GMOC recommendations that may have budget implications. This 2008 Annual Report focuses on fiscal year July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007; 2. The second half of 2007 and 2008 - to identify and address pertinent issues identified during this timeframe. This is to assure that the GMOC can and does respond to current events; and 3. A five-year forecast - The period from January 2008 through December 2012 is assessed for potential threshold compliance concerns. This assures that the GMOC has a future orientation. During this process, the GMOC distributes questionnaires to each City Department and outside agency that has responsibility for reporting on the threshold standards associated with the eleven quality of life indicators, and each completes a questionnaire to provide the GMOC with a status of development impacts to the City. The GMOC reviews the completed questionnaires and deliberates issues of compliance, the appropriateness of the threshold standards and whether they should be amended, and whether any new thresholds or standards should be considered. 1.3 GMOC 2008 Annual Review Process The GMOC held 16 meetings from October 2007 through May 2008, which were open to the public. GMOC members also participated in a City field trip on January 19, 2008. City Departments and external agencies completed threshold compliance questionnaires. The completed questionnaires were provided to the GMOC. The GMOC Commissioners reviewed the questionnaires and, where necessary, asked department 2008 Annual Reporl 6 1-19 June 2008 or agency representatives to appear in person to make clarifications and answer questions regarding the submitted questionnaires. City staff and the GMOC identified issues and conditions, as represented in the report. The GMOC also held a community workshop on April 17, 2008. See appendix B for this year's threshold questionnaires and responses. The final GMOC annual report is required to be transmitted through the Planning Commission to the City Council, scheduled for June 5, 2008. 1.4 Growth Forecast The Planning and Building Department annually prepares a Five-Year Growth Forecast, which was issued in December 2007. The Forecast provides departments and outside agencies with an estimate of the maximum amount of residential growth anticipated over the next five years. Each department and outside agency was then asked whether their respective public facility/service would be able to accommodate that growth or not. The forecast from November 2007 through December 2012 indicated an additional 8,146 residential units could be permitted for construction in the City, (6,845 in the east and 1,301 units in the west) for an annual average of 1,369 in the east and 260 units in the west, or just over 1,629 housing units permitted per year on average, citywide. The projected units permitted per year on average, citywide, is down by 333 units from last year's forecast. 1.5 Report Organization The 2008 GMOC Annual Report is organized into five sections: Section 1 - Introduction; description of GMOC's role and review process; an explanation of the Residential Growth Forecast; and an outline of the 2008 report Section 2 -- A threshold compliance summary in table format Section 3 - A threshold by threshold discussion of issues, acknowledgments, statements of concern (if any), and recommendations Section 4 -- A summary of potential growth management changes, including evaluation of existing threshold standards and potential changess considerations; and a review of the Planning Commission and City Council referrals from the 2007 Annual Report Section 5 -- Appendices 2008 Annual Report 7 1-20 June 2008 2.0 THRESHOLD COMPLIANCE SUMMARY The following table indicates a summary of the GMOC's conclusions regarding threshold standards for the 2008 annual review cycle. Seven thresholds were met and four were not. 1. Fiscal X X X 2. Air Quality X 3. Sewer X X 4. Water X 5. Libraries X X X 6. Drainage X 7. Parks & Recreation Land Facilities 8. Police Priority I X Priority II X X 9. Fire/EMS X 10. Traffic X X 11. Schools CV Elementary X School District Sweetwater Union X HighSchool District 2008 Annual Report 8 1-21 June 2008 3.0 THRESHOLD COMPLIANCE DISCUSSIONS 3.1 FISCAL Threshold Standards: 1. The GMOC shall be provided with an annual fiscal impact report which provides an evaluation of the impacts of growth on the City, both in terms of operations and capital improvements. This report should evaluate actual growth over the previous 12-month period, as well as projected growth over the next 12- to 18-month period, and 5-year period. 2. The GMOC shall be provided with an annual Development Impact Fee (DIF) Report, which provides an analysis of development impact fees collected and expended over the previous 12-month period. Threshold Finding: In Compliance 3.1.1 Maintenance of Development Impact Fees (DIF) Issue: Reallocating collected monies within the Public Facilities DIF Fund to self- finance different projects for which the monies were not intended has left the City with an inability to meet certain threshold standards. Discussion: The GMOC recognizes that all funds spent and / or transferred out of the DIF funds are authorized by the City Council, as identified in the budget and consistent with legal requirements. However, there has been no apparent accountability in repaying the funds for their intended use. In 2005, the libraries fund, under the Public Facilities DIF Fund, had $14.5 million, plus $4 million in interest. At this time, the fund is down to $7 million, not enough to finance a new library, which the City is obligated to do, per the threshold standard for libraries. Some of the $11.5 million spent was used for libraries, specifically to automate the South Chula Vista Library; to design a new library branch in Rancho del Rey; and to acquire land and books for the Rancho del Rey branch. The remainder of the $11.5 million was spent on other projects in the Public Facilities DIF fund. Recommendation: A comprehensive plan for repayment of funds needs to be established for inter-fund reallocating that occurs within the Public Facilities DIF Fund. 2008 Annual Report 9 1-22 June 2008 3.2 AIR QUALITY Threshold Standards: The GMOC shall be provided with an Annual Report which: 1. Provides an overview and evaiuation of local development projects approved during the prior year to determine to what extent they implemented measures designed to foster air quality improvement pursuant to relevant regional and local air quality improvement strategies. 2. Identifies whether the City's development regulations, policies, and procedures are consistent with current applicable federal, state, and regional air quality regulations and programs. 3. Identifies non-development related activities being undertaken by the City toward compliance with relevant federal, state, and local regulations regarding air quality, and whether the City has achieved compliance. The City shall provide a copy of said report to the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) for review and comment. In addition, the APCD shall report on overall regional and local air quality conditions, the status of regional air quality improvement implementation efforts under the Regional Air Quality Strategy and related federal and state programs, and the affect of those efforts/programs on the City of Chula Vista and local planning and development activities. Threshold Finding: In Compliance During the period under review, the City exceeded state smog standards only two days and federal standards one day, while the San Diego Region exceeded state standards 21 days and federal standards 8 days. As in previous years, Chula Vista continues to be a leader in implementing local measures and programs that contribute to pollution reduction and air quality improvement. 3.2.1 Chula Vista Development Procedures Regarding Federal, State and Regional Air Quality Regulations and Programs Issue: The City should enforce Section 20.04 (1982) of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC), which states that: All new residential units shall include plumbing specifically designed to allow the later installation of a system which utilizes solar energy as the primary means of heating domestic potable water. 2008 Annual Report 10 1-23 June 2008 Discussion: The CVMC authorizes the City building official to waive the requirement for Section 20.04 to be enforced. Enforcing this requirement will help make all new residential homes carbon neutral (balancing the amount of carbon released with the amount sequestered) by 2020, which is a goal of the California Energy Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission. Residential solar hot water systems reduce the burning of fossil fuels for home water heating, thus reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and criteria air pollutants. It is expected that energy codes will become much stricter over the next decade in order to meet the carbon neutral goal. Recommendation: In order to comply with CVMC 20.04, the City needs to inform applicants of this requirement in the early stages of the development process, and make sure building inspectors verify installation of these systems during final inspections. 3.2.2 Issue: Discussion: 2008 Annual Report City Programs for Air Quality Improvement Chula Vista needs to maintain satisfactory air quality and reduce air pollutants in the Chula Vista area. To improve local and regional air quality, the City of Chula Vista continues to implement several of the Action Measures in the Carbon Dioxide (C02) Reduction Plan, adopted by Council in November 2000, and conservation efforts related to the City's "Energy Strategy," adopted in 2001, to lower energy consumption and emissions. Following are some non-development related air quality programs that the City is currently implementing or participating in: South Bav Power Plant Removal According to the Air Pollution Control District, the South Bay Power Plant (SBPP) is the third largest source of air pollutants in San Diego County and the largest in Chula Vista. Annual emissions of criteria air pollutants from the SBPP are approximately 2.3 million pounds. Over the last few years, City elected officials and staff have been researching options to close the SBPP. Even if it were replaced, a new plant would produce at least 20% less pollution than the current plant and greatly improve Chula Vista's air quality levels. Enerqv Conservation Proqram In partnership with San Diego Gas & Electric, the City has just completed the second year of a three-year program to promote energy efficiency throughout the community. By saving energy, the program helps improve local air quaiity by reducing the energy demand on power plants. Specifically, the program is working to increase energy-efficiency within residential and business sectors by exchanging FREE Compact Fluorescent Lights and Pre-Rinse Spray Valves (food service facilities 11 1-24 June 2008 2008 Annual Report only) for older, inefficient models. Thus far, approximately 1,200 Compact Fluorescent Lights and 500 Spray Valves have been exchanged for a total savings of 1.1 million kilowatt hours and 400 therms, respectively. The estimated carbon (i.e. GHG) reduction from the program is 444 tons C02 per year. For reference, 100 tons C02 is equivalent to the annual emissions of 16 passenger vehicles. The program is also working to promote energy-efficiency remodels and new construction by modeling the energy impacts of several design alternatives for two new urban infill projects. The City hopes to be able to apply the results of these models to other new projects to promote energy efficient design elsewhere. Energy-efficient construction will be further promoted in 2008 through a program designed to educate planning counter staff and building inspectors in the latest energy-efficient technology so that they can promote energy-efficient alternatives as part of the standard application process. Urban Shade Tree Prooram In mid-2007 the City received a new grant from the California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection to expand its shade tree planting program over the next few years. This grant continued the work of an earlier project in which 460 new trees were planted along older residential streets. Shade trees help mitigate the Urban Heat Island Effect and improve air quality by removing CO2, dust and other particulates. The new project will plant over 1,200 shade trees along residential streets, canyon parkways, and within community parks and will increase the air quality benefits associated with urban forests. To date, 180 trees have been planted with the help of 100 volunteers. The estimated carbon reduction from the program is 2,340 pounds C02 per year. Aiternative Fuel Vehicles Vehicles using Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), hydrogen, and electricity have been incorporated into the municipal fleet. Recently, the City has been pursuing funds to reduce NOx emissions by 50% in the transit fleet by using a blend of hydrogen and CNG. In addition, the City is launching a new Nature Center shuttle bus which showcases hydrogen internal combustion engine (H2ICE) technology. Although transportation planning typically occurs at a more regionallevel, local infrastructure improvements will help Chula Vista be prepared for growing community demand for Alternative Fuel Vehicles and fueling stations. The City continues to seek funding to upgrade a CNG fuel dispenser at the Public Works Yard to accommodate the growing public demand for a convenient CNG fueling station. Presently, the nearest public CNG dispenser is 15 miles from the South Bay area. 12 1-25 June 2008 Climate Chance Actions On April 1, 2008, City Council adopted seven climate change actions presented by the City's Climate Change Working Group. These actions will help the City meet, or make the most progress towards meeting, its ICLEl/Kyoto commitment of reducing citywide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 20% below 1990 levels. Recommendation:1) That the City continue to vigorously implement its Carbon Dioxide (C02) Reduction Plan, Energy Strategy and Climate Change Actions. 2) That the City Council, as it follows up with the City's Climate Change Working Group, develop options for devising an air quaiity Threshold Standard that would serve as an appropriate measuring device. 3.3 SEWER Threshold Standards: 1. Sewage flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards (75% of design capacity). 2. The City shall annually provide the San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Authority with a 12 to 18-month development forecast and request confirmation that the projection is within the City's purchased capacity rights and an evaluation of their ability to accommodate the forecasted and continuing growth, or the City Public Works Department staff shall gather the necessary data. The information provided to the GMOC shall include: a. Amount of current capacity now used or committed. b. Ability of affected facilities to absorb forecasted growth. c. Evaluation of funding and site availability for projected new facilities. d. Other relevant information. The growth forecast and Authority response letters shall be provided to the GMOC for inclusion in its review. Threshold Finding: Non-Compliance (#1) In one instance, City sewage flows and volumes exceeded City Engineering Standards (75% of design capacity). 3.3.1. Non-Compliant Industrial Boulevard Sewer Line Issue: During the period under review, sewage flows and volumes exceeded City Engineering Standards in a section of the Industrial Boulevard sewer line, which did not comply with the threshold standard. 2008 Annual Report 13 1-26 June 2008 Discussion: The City has a comprehensive Infrastructure Flow Monitoring Program that is driven by data obtained from the 2005 Wastewater Master Plan. Through that effort, Wastewater Engineering staff determined that flows in a section of the Industrial Boulevard sewer line near the intersection of industrial Bouievard and Main Street exceeds the established threshold; that is, a pipe is more than 75% full. Therefore, that section of the sewer line may need to be upsized. The City is in the process of completing design plans for the construction of improvements on the Main Street Trunk sewer line, which will improve the downstream flow condition near the intersection of Main Street and Industrial Boulevard. City staff has performed hydraulic studies on both the Industrial Boulevard sewer line and the Main Street Trunk sewer line. Through that analysis, staff has determined that, before upsizing the Industrial Boulevard sewer line, it would be more prudent to first complete the required improvements on Main Street (scheduled to be finished by the end of the calendar year), then re-evaluate the Industrial Boulevard sewer constraints. In the interim, staff will tentatively schedule the Industrial Boulevard Sewer improvements for inclusion in the CIP program for next fiscal year, pending the outcome of the analysis. Recommendation:That in 2008/09, the City should complete the required improvements on the Main Street Trunk sewer line; upon completion, the Industrial Boulevard sewer line constraints should be re-evaluated. Staff should tentatively schedule the Industrial Boulevard sewer line improvements for inclusion in the CIP program for next fiscal year, pending the outcome of the analysis. 3.3.2 Long-Term Treatment Capacity Average 16.979 17.062 17 .894 19.399 25.87 Flow Capacity 20.875 20.864 20.864 20.864 20.864 "Buildout Projection based on the SANDAG (2040) Issue: The City of Chula Vista's entitlement for treatment capacity will need to increase by 5 Million Gallons per Day (MGD) before build-out. Discussion: While the 5-year forecast for Chula Vista's average daily sewage flow in Million Gallons per Day (MGD) does not exceed the City's treatment capacity allotted through City contracts with the City of San Diego's Metro System, the 2005 Wastewater Master Plan indicated that Chula Vista would need to acquire an additional 5 MGDs of treatment capacity to 2008 Annua/ Report 14 1-27 June 2008 facilitate the City's build-out. Additional capacity could be provided in either of two ways: 1. Construction of an independent treatment facility; or 2. Purchase of additional treatment capacity rights from other agencies in the Metro system. Treatment Facilitv - The City recently completed a Joint Feasibility Study with Otay Water District and Sweetwater Authority, which explored the feasibility of constructing a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Wastewater Reclamation Plant. The intent was to evaluate the feasibility of a plant that would take a portion of the raw sewage from the sewer system, treat it and generate recycled water that would then be utilized by Otay and Sweetwater in meeting their customers' irrigation needs. The remaining sewage in the system will continue to be treated by the Metro system. By reducing the amount of flow conveyed to the Metro system, the City would not need to acquire additional treatment capacity at that plant. The study determined that it was feasible for the City to build the MBR plant if the City could enter into an agreement with Otay Water District to take the recycled water generated. The study further determined that it was not economically feasible for Sweetwater Authority to participate in the project since they did not have a separate recycled water distribution system like Otay Water District. Staff is now in the process of working with Otay Water District to re-verify their long-term market demand projections. Concurrent with that, staff is also engaged in discussions with funding agencies (like the County Water Authority, State Water Resources Control Board etc.) to determine the availability of grants and no-cost/low interest loans that may lower the cost of the facility to make it more economical. Purchase of Additional Treatment Capacitv Riqhts - Concurrent with the MBR feasibility study, the City has also been exploring the feasibility of acquiring additional capacity through the purchase of treatment capacity rights from other agencies in the Metro system that may have excess capacity in the system. However, most agencies do not have excess capacity that they would be willing to sell at this time. Some have indicated a willingness to do renewable short-term leases as part of a pooled capacity plan that is being discussed among member agencies. Currently, staff is actively engaged in discussions with the City of San Diego for the acquisition of the additional capacity rights. The negotiation has been impacted by the organizational changes in the City of San Diego, specifically, changes at the management/decision-making level of the Metropolitan Wastewater Department. Staff anticipates that in the next six months a decision would be reached on the final acquisition price. At that point the City would be in a position to decide on whether to pay that price or begin the process of building its own treatment plant. Recommendation: By fall 2009, Council should adopt a plan to substantially begin the process of increasing additional capacity that will be needed by 2017. 2008 Annual Report 15 1-28 June 2008 This will allow the time necessary to plan and deliver the needed capacity or facility. 3.4 WATER Threshold Standards: 1. Developer will request and deliver to the City a service availability letter from the Water District for each project. 2. The City shall annually provide the San Diego County Water Authority, the Sweetwater Authority, and the Otay Municipal Water District with a 12-18 month development forecast and request evaluation of their ability to accommodate the forecast and continuing growth. The districts' replies should address the following: a. Water availability to the City and Planning Area, considering both short and long term perspectives. b. Amount of current capacity, including storage capacity, now used or committed. c. Ability of affected facilities to absorb forecast growth. d. Evaluation of funding and site availability for projected new facilities. e. Other relevant information the Districts desire to communicate to the City and GMOC. Threshold Finding: In Compliance Both the Otay Water District (OWD) and Sweetwater Authority (SWA) have indicated that they will be able to meet Chula Vista's water demand for the 12 - 18 month period, and for the next five years, as shown in the tables below. Total Flow Supply 130.6 138.7 144.7 144.7 184.7 Capacity Potable Stora e Capacity 190.7 196.1 196.1 218.3 235.8 Non-Potable Storage 31.7 31.7 43.7 43.7 47.7 Capacity Potable Supply Flow 129.5 137.5 137.5 137.5 175.5 Capacity Non-Potable Supply Flow 1.1 1.2 7.2 7.2 9.2 Capacity 2008 Annual Report 16 1-29 June 2008 Sweetwater Authority WATER DEMAND and CAPACITY (Million Gallons Per day (MGD)) FY 12-18 Month 5 -Year 2006 Projection Proiection Yearly Demand -- (Purchased by 7,934 8,100 8,350 consumers, MG) Yearly Supply Capacity, 4,281 4,281 4,281 MG (1,2) -. LOCAL Yearly Supply Capacity, 4,757 4,757 4,757 MG (1,2) -- IMPORTED Yearly Supply Capacity, 9,058 9,058 9,058 MG (1,2) -- TOTAL Storage Capacity, MG --Treated 42 42 45 Water Storage Capacity, MG -- Raw 5,676 5,676 5,676 Water Notes: 1) Maximum supply capacity includes 62 cfs (40 mgd) treated water connectIon, Robert Perdue Treatment Plant (30 mgd), Reynolds DesaI. plant (4mgd) and National City Wells (2 mgd). 2) Normal maximum supply capacity is from Robert Perdue Treatment Plant (30 mgdl, Reynolds DesaI. plant (4mgd) and National City Wells (2 mgd). 3) There are 11 emergency interconnedions with a current 16.92 MGD capacity or 6,176 MG per year. This supply is not always readily available and can't be used for extended periods and will be counted as imported water. 4) Local supply components are Desai (4 MGD), NC Wells (2MGD), and Perdue Treatment Plant (30 MGD). Imported Supply components are Treated Water Connection (40MDG). There is an imported raw water connection that is not counted since it is limited by the local Perdue Treatment plant. 3.4.1 Meeting Water Demands Issue: None Discussion: Otay Water District and Sweetwater Authority serve the City of Chula Vista, and both report that they will be able to meet the water demands of anticipated grow1h over the next five years. Otav Water District Otay Water District indicates that capital improvement program (CIP) facilities are built as needed, and are currently in various stages of development to meet water demands. Their six-year CIP documentation can be found, viewed, and downloaded from the Otay Water District web site at http://www.otavwater.qov/owd/index.aspx. Sweetwater Authoritv Sweetwater Authority indicates that some facility improvements are necessary within the service area, and more are anticipated with proposed development. Timing to complete these improvements is 2008 Annual Report 17 1-30 June 2008 subject to available funding on a year-to-year basis. However, new development, such as Bayfront development, may be required to proceed with these improvements, or complete additional improvements beyond those identified in the Master Plan. The District has necessary land to accommodate new water facilities, such as water tanks; pipelines would be installed under Chula Vista public streets. Rate payers, developer capacity fees and potential government grants would finance the improvement. Recommendation: That the City continue to work with Otay Water District and Sweetwater Authority to maintain and track future development in order to continue to meet the water availability threshold. 3.4.2 Emergency Water Supply Issue: Provision of water supply during a catastrophic emergency. Discussion: Both of the major water districts serving the City of Chula Vista, the Otay Water District and the Sweetwater Authority, report that they will be able to meet the water demands in case of a catastrophic emergency. State law requires that an emergency supply of up to two years be available for water company customers. Otav Water District The potential for interruptions to the water supply continue to be addressed by Otay Water District (OWD), San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA), and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) through the development of long-term emergency water supply such as the MWD Diamond Valley Reservoir (six months), the SDCWA Emergency Storage Project (90 days), and the OWD ten-day storage, conservation and alternative supply strategy. The MWD, SDCWA, and OWD continue to pursue the availability of alternative water supply and supply diversification to be used under normal and in emergency conditions. OWD's need for a ten-day water supply during a SDCWA shutdown is actively being implemented and has been fully addressed in the Water Resources Master Plan (WRMP) dated August 2002 and the recently completed Integrated Water Resources Plan (IRP). OWD has the ability to meet and exceed this requirement within the City of Chula Vista service area through storage capacity, conservation efforts, and existing interconnections with other agencies. MWD, SDCWA, and OWD all have programs to continue to meet or exceed the emergency water suppiy needs of the region into the foreseeable future. 2008 Annual Report 18 1-31 June 2008 Sweetwater Authority Sweetwater Authority currently operates eleven emergency interconnections with a current capacity of 16.92 MGD and is scheduled to install two additional connections for a total capacity of 19.80 MGD. Recommendation:That the City continue to support Otay Water District and Sweetwater Authority and their water emergency policies. 3.5 LIBRARIES Threshold Standard: The City shall construct 60,000 gross square feet (GSF) of additional library space, over the June 30, 2000 GSF total, in the area east of Interstate 805 by build-out. The construction of said facilities shall be phased such that the City will not fall below the citywide ratio of 500 GSF per 1,000 population. Library facilities are to be adequately equipped and staffed. Threshold Finding: Non-Compliance The City's library system has not kept pace with growth; the facilities ratio of 500 GSF per 1,000 population has not been met for the past four years, beginning in FY 03-04, as shown in the table below. Future forecasts indicate that the Libraries Threshold Standard will remain out of compliance until the Rancho del Rey Library is constructed. FY 1998-99 169,265 102,000 603 FY 1999-00 178,645 102,000 571 FY 2000-01 187,444 102,000 544 FY 2001-02 195,000 102,000 523 FY 2002-03 203,000 102,000 502 FY 2003-04 211,800 102,000 482 FY 2004-05 220,000 102,000 464 FY 2005-06 223,423 102,000 457 FY 2006-07' 227,723 102,000 448 229,613 102,000 444 253,600 132,000 520'" "'Planning Division Estimate ....S-year projections are based on GMOC Forecast ......Assumes the opening of the Eastern Urban Center facility. 2008 Annual Report 19 1-32 June 2008 Issue: Discussion: Four the fourth consecutive year, the City has not compiied with the threshold standard of providing 500 gross square feet of library facilities per 1000 people. There is an urgency to begin construction of the Rancho Del Rey library branch. The Library Threshold Standard Implementation Measure requires that the City Council formally adopt and fund tactics to bring the library system into conformance, and that construction, or another actual solution, shall be scheduled to commence within three years of the threshold not being satisfied (June 2007). The Growth Management Ordinance calls for Council to hold a public hearing within 60 days to consider a moratorium. As discussed in last year's GMOC Report, the Rancho del Rey library branch should have been built before the ratio of gross square feet of library space first fell below the threshold standard at the end of June 2004. Without the Rancho del Rey library, there is a lack of conveniently located library facilities to serve the east side of Chula Vista. The most significant influencing factor on library use is proximity of the facility to the user. The 1998 Library Master Plan calls for the construction of a 30,000- square-foot, fuli-service, regional library in Rancho del Rey. The GMOC understands that the City has purchased the land for the library, and that it has a design/build agreement to complete a 31,200-square-foot library at the site; the plans are complete, and the City has a contractual commitment. Construction, which will take approximately one year to complete, can begin once Council approves funding. Staff needs to come up with a specific plan and timeline for construction; the City will be back in compliance with the Libraries threshold standard once Rancho del Rey library is completed. Recommendation:That the City Council direct the City Manager to prepare a specific plan and timeline for the replenishment of the Libraries component of the PFDIF, and construction of the Rancho del Rey library at the earliest possible time. 3.5.2 Issue: Discussion: 2008 Annual Report Updating the Library Master Plan The 1998 Library Master Plan is due to be updated and needs to reflect the December 2005 General Plan Update. Last year, the GMOC noted the need to update the 1998 Library Master Plan to reflect increased library needs generated by projected build-out population from the 2005 General Plan Update. The update also needs to consider changing trends to define the adequacy of library facilities and equipment, and what constitutes adequate staffing and hours of operation. Once an updated baseline is established, the plan would recommend how to most effectively and efficiently achieve the thresholds, both in relation to new facilities and in regards to updating existing facilities, given projected infill development. 20 1-33 June 2008 Recommendation: 1) Assess ultimate future library needs based upon the increased capacity from the City's updated General Plan, and accordingly update the Library Facilities Master Plan, and the threshold standards reference. 2) Actively pursue planning for a new Eastern Urban Center branch library in an amount sufficient to address the new General Plan build-out population needs. 3.6 DRAINAGE Threshold Standards: 1. Storm water flows and volumes shali not exceed City Engineering standards. 2. The GMOC shali annually review the performance of the City's storm drain system to determine its ability to meet that goal. Threshold Finding: In Compliance Storm water flows and volumes during the reporting period were within City engineering standards. 3.6.1 Maintenance of Existing Drainage Issue: For channels that require permits from environmental resource agencies before maintenance can be conducted, it is necessary to develop acceptable channel maintenance procedures and obtain appropriate environmental permits. Discussion: The City currently participates in a regional work group that has been established to develop channel maintenance procedures that are acceptable to resource agencies and facilitate obtaining environmental permits for channel maintenance from resource agencies. The workgroup, consisting of 18 agencies ("co-permittees") in the San Diego region, has hired a consultant to iron out the difficulties and obtain consensus from resource agencies on a streamlined process understandable by, and acceptable to, ali parties. This is important because obtaining permits for channel maintenance is a time-consuming and costiy process; and in some cases, there may be conflicting requirements from different resource agencies. Although the City went through the steps of hiring its own consultant to help obtain the required permits, a consultant has not been hired, due to funding constraints. Recommendation: The City should continue to participate in the Regional Channel Maintenance Workgroup subcommittee, as the group's consultant 2008 Annual Report 21 1-34 June 2008 3.6.2 Issue: Discussion: continues to work with environmental resource agencies in streamlining a process for obtaining environmental permits. Funding for Future Facilities Required Accommodate 5-Year Growth Forecast to General impacts on deveioped areas in western Chula Vista may need to be funded by the City. Development and redevelopment is projected in the 5-year forecast for the Telegraph Canyon Basin west of Interstate 805. Priority 1 drainage projects in this basin include the unimproved portion of the channel downstream (southwest) of Sierra Way, associated drainage facilities near the intersection of Third Avenue and L Street, and culverts at Country Club Drive and First Avenue. Such improvements, both capacity and erosion, can be partially funded through the Telegraph Canyon Drainage DIF. However, there may not be sufficient funds in the DIF to finance all the improvements needed in this basin. Since the areas adjacent to most new development are generally privately owned, the property owner will fund their proportionate share of these improvements as a condition of development. However, general impacts on developed areas may need to be funded by the City. Insufficient facilities and/or funds could resuit in an increased potential for flooding, for collapse of corroded CMP, and for erosion. For the City's NPDES program, it could result in impairment of water quality within receiving waters and create a condition of non-compliance with the Municipal Permit, exposing the City to penalties. Engineering staff has had two workshops with City Council to identify infrastructure needs. The first was held in April 2007; the second in February 2008. A third workshop will be held to discuss funding. Recommendation: Through local, state and federal monies, the City should be prepared to fund any shortfalls associated with construction of new improvements and/or improvements to existing drainage facilities. 3.7 PARKS & RECREATION Threshold Standard: Three acres of neighborhood and community parkland with appropriate facilities shall be provided per 1,000 residents east of 1-805. Threshold Finding: In Compliance 2008 Annual Report 22 1-35 June 2008 3.7.1 Land Issue: Discussion: Threshold Compliance None The land threshold is in compliance for the period under review. Current (6/30107) eastern Chula Vista parkland inventory will provide adequate acreage to accommodate up to 129,814 persons. With a current population of 108,524 persons in the east, there is a current developed parkland overage of 63.87 acres. The 18-month forecast projects an eastern Chula Vista population of 113,152 (an increase of 4,628). The increase would necessitate an additional 13.88 acres of developed parkland. With a current overage of 63.87 acres, east inventories are adequate to accommodate the anticipated 18-month population forecast. It is anticipated that the 5-year population forecast of 129.442 for eastern Chula Vista (an increase of 20,918) will also be accommodated by required parkland acreage. With Mount San Miguel Community Park and All Seasons Park slated for construction in the latter half of 2008, and two neighborhood parks in Otay Ranch Village 2 planned for late 2011, there will be 41.3 acres of additional parkland, bringing the eastern Chula Vista parkland inventory to 430.73 acres, which can accommodate a population 143,577. This would result in a projected overage of 42.4 acres. Recommendation: None Facilities Issue: Discussion: None During the period under review, the facilities sited within the requisite park acreage are consistent with the types of facilities identified in the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan and are, therefore considered "appropriate' in the context of the threshold standard, which does not identify a quantity of facilities necessary to be in compliance. The City's Park and Recreation Master Plan and the parkland dedication ordinance has a formula, however, to determine the quantity of facilities necessary to meet the recreational demand of the residents. Based on the formula, certain types of facilities (e.g., practice softball fields, baseball fields, practice soccer fields, tennis courts, basketball courts, and swimming pools) are currently experiencing shortages in terms of meeting current demands, although some of the demand for these fields and courts is being met at non-public park sites, such as school sites. Recommendation: None 2008 Annual Report 23 1-36 June 2008 3.7.2 Issue: Discussion: Threshold Standard Change The Parks & Recreation threshold standard should be changed to address new growth, citywide. The existing threshold standard for Parks & Recreation specifies that three acres of neighborhood and community park land with appropriate facilities shall be provided per 1,000 residents east of Interstate 805. The ratio is currently being satisfied, and the threshold standard monitors that. However, in western Chula Vista, it is anticipated that there will be new population growth with requisite park and recreation needs, thereby necessitating a citywide threshold standard. Therefore, it is recommended that a citywide standard be used that can ensure that parks and recreation facilities keep pace with new growth. Additionally, it should be ensured that all parks developed with funding from new residential growth west of 1-805 be developed in within this area. The current ratio of parks west of Interstate 805 is approximately 1.15 acres per 1,000 residents (.91 acres per 1,000 between Interstates 5 and 805). It will take an additional 157 acres of park land to achieve a citywide ratio of 3 acres per 1,000 residents; however, new development cannot be made legally responsible for increasing park land above 3 acres per 1,000 new residents resulting from new development. Beyond the responsibilities of new development, creative new strategies for increasing developed park land west of Interstate 805 are needed to build upon pre-existing park acreage levels. Recommendation: 1) As part of the Top-to-Bottom review, the Parks & Recreation threshold standard should be amended to read: "Three acres of park land, with appropriate facilities, shall be provided per 1,000 residents for new development, citywide." 2) A City policy should be adopted that requires that all new parks developed with funding from new residential growth west of Interstate 805 be developed within this area. 3.7.3 Issue: Discussion: 2008 Annual Report Providing Park and Recreation Facilities in Western Chula Vista There is a need for additional parks and recreational facilities in western Chula Vista, and for acquiring land and funding for construction, to meet the needs for new residential population. A challenge exists in western Chula Vista in terms of the delivery of and development of parkland and recreational facilities to meet the demands created by future residential development. Concern exists regarding the challenge of acquiring new parkland in developed areas of the City, particularly western Chula Vista. 24 1-37 June 2008 While future growth will result in the need and requirement for additional parkland and recreational facilities, there will be increased challenges in securing appropriate park and recreation sites in western Chula Vista, where land is prirnarily built out. Lack of vacant and under-utilized parcels of land and/or competing demands and uses for land in the west represent obstacles to expanding park and recreation facility inventory. Developing creative strategies for delivering park and recreation facilities is essential to providing for new residential population. The internal draft Parks and Recreation Master Plan document includes a focused discussion on park delivery in western Chula Vista. Strategies for future western Chula Vista parkland development include developing parks on public agency controlled lands, developing parks on underutilized and vacant lands suitable for parks, and developing parks of varying sizes and character (community, neighborhood, and urban parks) that demonstrably meet defined recreational needs. Future recreational needs in western Chula Vista can be addressed by individually and or collectively applying these strategies. Recommendation:The City shall develop: 1) new models and approaches for meeting recreational land and facility needs in developed western Chula Vista; and 2) a plan for acquiring and funding land and facilities. 3.7.4 Parks and Recreation Master Plan Issue: Updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan is still incomplete. Discussion: An internal draft of the update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan has been completed and reviewed by legal staff. Parks and Recreation staff is currently responding to legal's comments and incorporating suggested changes into a final draft. The document maintains consistency with the established General Plan policy pertaining to providing 3 acres of park land per 1,000 residents for new residential development, citywide. The GMOC requests the opportunity to review updated studies and plans that address how future parkland and facility needs will be addressed in western Chula Vista, including the updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Recommendation: A draft of the updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan shall be made available for review by the GMOC as part of its next (2009) annual review cycle. 2008 Annual Report 25 1-38 June 2008 3.8 POLICE Threshold Standard: Priority I Emergency Response: Properly equipped and staffed police units shall respond to 81% of the Priority I emergency calls throughout the City within seven (7) minutes and shall maintain an average response time to all Priority I calls of five minutes and thirty seconds (5.5 minutes) or less (measured annually). Priority II Urgent Response: Properly equipped and staffed police units shall respond to 57% of the Priority II urgent calls throughout the City within seven (7) minutes and shall maintain an average response time to all Priority II calls of seven minutes and thirty seconds (7.5 minutes) or less (measured annually). Threshold Finding: Priority I: Priority II: Compliance Non-Compliance 43.3% 7 minutes 11: 18 min./sec. 2008 Annual Report 26 1-39 June 2008 3.8.1 Priority I Threshold Findings FY 2006-07 FY 2005-06 FY 2004-05 FY 2003-04 FY 2002-03 FY 2001-02 FY 2000-01 FY 1999-00 CY 19992 FY 1997-98 FY 1996-97 FY 1995-96 Issue: Discussion: 976 of 74,277 84.5% 4:59 1,068 of 73,075 82.3% 4:51 1,289 of 74,106 80.0% 5:11 1,322 of 71,000 82.1% 4:52 1,424 of 71,268 80.8% 4:55 1,539 of 71,859 80.0% 5:07 1,734 of 73,977 79.7% 5:13 1,750 of 76,738 75.9% 5:21 1,890 of 74,405 70.9% 5:50 1,512 of 69,196 74.8% 5:47 1,968 of 69,904 83.8% 4:52 1,9150f71,197 83.0% 4:46 None During the period under review, the Police Department responded to 84.5% of Priority I Emergency Response calls within 7 minutes. This is 3.5% better than the threshold standard requires. With an average response time of 4 minutes and 59 seconds, the response time increased by 8 seconds from last year, but still complies with the threshold standard of 5 minutes 30 seconds, or less. Recommendation: None \ All figures after FY 2000-2001 (as well as Priority II figures on the next page) reflect a change in citizen-initiated call reporting criteria. Prior to FY 01.02, citizen-initiated calls were determined according to call type; they are now determined according to received source. Using the old method of reporting calls for service to better compare change over time, total citizen-initiated calls actually increased 1.5% from FYQQ-Q1 to FY01-0Z. 2 The FY98-99 GMOC report used calendar 1999 data due to the implementation of the new CAD system in mid.1998. 2008 Annual Report 27 1-40 June 2008 3.8.2 Non-Compliance of Priority II Threshold FY 2006-07 24,407 of 74,277 43.3% 11:18 FY 2005-06 24,876 of 73,075 40.0% 12:33 FY 2004-05 24,923 of7 4,106 40.5% 11:40 FY 2003-04 24,741 of 71,000 48.4% 9:50 FY 2002-03 22,871 of 71,268 50.2% 9:24 FY 2001-02 22,199of71,859 45.6% 10:04 FY 2000-01 25,234 of 73,977 47.9% 9:38 FY 1999-00 23,898 of 76,738 46.4% 9:37 CY 1999 20,405 of 74,405 45.8% 9:35 FY 1997-98 22,342 of 69,196 52.9% 8:13 FY 1996-97 22,140 of 69,904 62.2% 6:50 FY 1995-96 21,743of71,197 64.5% 6:38 * These figures do not include responses to false alanns beginning in FY 2002-03. Issue: Priority II calls continue to be in non-compliance with the threshold standard. Discussion: For ten consecutive years, the threshold standard for Priority II - Urgent Response has not been met. During the period under review, there was improvement from the previous year, however. For percentage of call responses within 7 minutes, the number increased 3.3%; but at 43.3%, it was still 13.7% below the threshold standard. The average response time during the period under review also improved from the previous year. With an average of 11 minutes 18 seconds, the response time improved 1 minute 15 seconds from last year's 12 minutes 33 seconds. However, this year's improved response time was stili 3 minutes 48 seconds over the threshold standard of 7 minutes 30 seconds. There has been a correlation between staffing levels and the average response time for Priority II calls. Based on a review of patrol staffing levels and response times during 35 swing shifts in February and March of 2007, when staffing was heaviest (18 to 20 officers), response times averaged 11.3 minutes; when staffing was lightest (12 to 13 officers), response times averaged 15.4 minutes. While the Police Department does not have a position on whether the threshold standard should be modified regarding Priority II calls, they 2008 Annual Report 28 1-41 June 2008 advise that response times should be viewed with some caution. National research' on response times has shown the following: Victims of robbery, rape, assault and other "victim-involvement" crimes waited an average of 41 minutes before calling police; o If victims wait 9 minutes or more before calling police, the likelihood of arrest is not related to police travel time; o Reducing response times is unlikely to reduce crime levels; o Community satisfaction with police response times is very dependent on incident-specific expectations. That is, if a dispatcher indicates a patrol car will arrive quickly and it doesn't arrive as fast as the caller expected, it's more likely the caller will be dissatisfied. If a dispatcher's response time prediction is accurate - even if they indicate the response will be delayed - it's more likely the caller will be satisfied. A final report from SANDAG on the 2007 Chula Vista Police Department Resident Opinion Survey indicates that: o 94% of residents are satisfied with the services of the Chula Vista Police Department; o 93% or residents feel police officers show fair treatment, display professional conduct, and have a respectful attitude; and o The top three public safety concerns for residents are speeding vehicles, aggressive driving, and vehicles running red lights. Last year's GMOC report recommended that the Police Department be directed to implement an action plan addressing the decline in performance relative to meeting the GMOC threshold for Priority II calls. The Police Chief is in the process of preparing a memo. Recommendation: The City Council shall direct the City Manager to have the Police Department complete and implement an action plan which addresses the decline in performance relative to meeting the GMOC threshold for Priority II calls, by fall 2008. 1 Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesnl, What's Promising: A Report to the United States Congress, prepared for the National Institute of Justice by Lawrence W. Sherman, Denise Gottfredson, Doris MacKenzie, John Eck, Peter Reuter, and Shawn Bushway in collaboration with members of the Graduate Program, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Maryland. 1997. 2008 Annual Report 29 1-42 . June 2008 3.8.3 Priority I Calls Taking Longer Than 10 Minutes 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 814 850 1,023 1,106 1,216 37 50 65 63 62 4.5 5.9 6.4 5.7 5.1 Issue: City Council has asked that Priority I response times that are 10 minutes or longer be sent to the GMOC for Council review. Discussion: During the period under review, 4.5% of Priority I calls (37 of the 814 calls available for analysis) had response times greater than 10 minutes. This is the second consecutive year that the numbers have improved. Last year 5.9% (50 of 850) Priority I response times exceed 10 minutes. Based on a review of the 37 Priority I call for service narratives/ accompanying case reports, there were no negative results due to the longer response times in 31 of the calls. In six of the calls it is impossible to determine whether there were negative results. However, there is no evidence that responding any faster to these calls would have changed the outcome of the calls. Recommendation: The Police Department shall closely monitor performance with regards to Priority I calls with response times over 10 minutes. 3.9 FIRE I EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES Threshold Standard: Emergency response: Properly equipped and staffed fire and medical units shall respond to calls throughout the city within seven (7) minutes in 80% (current service to be verified) of the cases (measured annually). Threshold Finding: In Compliance 88.1 6 minutes 24 seconds 1 This column includes only those calls that had arrive times or were not canceled prior to officer arrival (in these cases, no response time can be calculated), and those cans with original priorities of I. 2008 Annual Report 30 1-43 June 2008 3.9.1 Reporting Period Consistency FY 2007 10,020 88.1% 6:24 3:30 CY 2006 10,390 85.2% 6:43 3:36 CY 2005 9907 81.6% 7:05 3:31 FY 2003-04 8420 72.9% 7:38 3:32 FY 2002-03 8088 75.5% 7:35 3:43 FY 2001-02 7626 69.7% 7:53 3:39 FY 2000-01 7128 80.8% 7:02 3:18 FY 1999-00 6654 79.7% 3:29 Note: Reporting period for FY 2001-02 and 2002~03 is for October 1, 2002 to September 30,2003. The difference in 2004 performance when compared to 2003 is within the 2.5% range of expected yearly variation and not statistically significant. Issue: None Discussion: The Fire response time threshold standard was met during fiscal year 2007. This is the first time in two years that the threshoid standard was measured by fiscal year, rather than calendar year. Last year, the GMOC recommended that the threshold standard resume being measured by fiscal year, as it had been up until 2005. From calendar year 2006 to fiscal year 2007, the percentage of calls responded to within 7 minutes improved by nearly 3%; the response time went down by 19 seconds; and the average travel time improved by 6 seconds. Recommendation: None 3.9.2 Fire Facilities Master Plan and Advance Life Support Study (ALS) Issue: The Fire Facilities Master Plan and Advance Life Support Study (ALS) are complete but have not been brought to City Council for review and action. Discussion: The Fire Department has completed its Fire Facilities Master Plan Advance Life Support (ALS) Study, and has already presented a preliminary summary of the ALS Program to the pubiic safety committee. However, neither have been brought to City Council. Existing facilities, staffing and equipment may not be sufficient to accommodate forecasted growth for the next five years if major projects such as the Bayfront Master Plan, Urban Core Specific Plan and the 2008 Annual Report 31 1-44 June 2008 University move forward. The impact of this development is addressed in the Fire Facilities Master Plan. Recommendation: The Fire Facilities Master Plan and Advance Life Support Study should be brought to City Council for review and action during the upcoming GMOC review cycle so that any fire and emergency response issues related to future growth can be addressed. 3.9.3 Outsourcing Dispatch System to San Diego Issue: The GMOC is concerned that meeting the threshold standard will be negatively affected by outsourcing Chula Vista's emergency dispatch system. Discussion: In December 2007, Chula Vista decided to outsource its fire dispatch calls. Since March 2008, fire and medical dispatch calls for Chula Vista have been handled by dispatchers in San Diego, an arrangement that is supposed to save money and improve response times to emergency calls. However, the GMOC believes that meeting the threshold has been directly affected by the City having its own dispatch center. The system allows San Diego and Chula Vista to communicate instantly, rather than having to pass information through multiple dispatch centers. Both cities are supposed to benefit by sharing resources, including fire engines, ladder trucks, brush engines and personnel. Recommendation: The Fire Chief shall furnish the GMOC with data on response and calls for service after the transition to San Diego dispatch. 3.10 TRAFFIC Threshold Standard: Citywide: Maintain Level of Service (LOS) .C" or better as measured by observed average travel speed on all signalized arterial segments, except that during peak hours a LOS "D" can occur for no more than two hours of the day. West of 1-805: Those signalized arterial segments that do not meet the standard above, may continue to operate at their current (year 1991) LOS, but shall not worsen. Threshold Finding: Non-Compliance SEGMENT DIR. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) NB 2008 Annual Report 32 1-45 June 2008 There were five signalized arterial segments that failed to maintain Level of Service (LOS) "C" and three of the five operated at LOS "D", or less, for more than two hours a day. 3.10.1 Non-Compliance of Threshold Standard Issue: There were three non-compliant arterial segments during the period under review. Discussion: The three arterial segments, noted in the table above, that do not comply with the threshold standard, are located in eastern Chuia Vista in proximity to the SR-125 toll road. Heritage Road (Olympic Parkway/Telegraph Canyon Road) is non-compliant for the second year in a row. In last year's review cycle, traffic signal timing was an Issue for that segment, and the GMOC recommended that no modifications be made, and that the situation be re-evaluated after the opening of SR-125. SR-125 opened in November 2007, after the period under review ended. The impacts of the toll road on major east/west roadways in eastern Chula Vista are currently being monitored, and City engineering staff will prepare a report on its findings in June. If the three segments continue to be non-compliant, the report will include recommendations that will mitigate the impacts. Recommendation: City engineering staff shall provide recommendations that will mitigate non-compliance if post-SR-125 traffic studies indicate that the three segments continue to be non-compliant with the Traffic threshold standard. 3.10.2 Maintenance and Rehabilitation of City Streets Issue: Street pavement and maintenance. Discussion: The City's Pavement Management consultant completed most of the work on the City's new Pavement Management System during Fiscal Year 2006-07. At a City Council workshop on April 5, 2007, the overall results of the Pavement Management System were presented. Although the City's overall pavement condition is classified as good, annual rehabilitation is required to prevent continued pavement deterioration. The goal Is to perform the most cost-effective treatments to maintain the best overall pavement condition, not just to rehabilitate the "worst first". Council passed a resolution at the April 2007 workshop, reaffirming its commitment to the implementation of a true Pavement Management System. Staff then generated various rehabilitation scenarios, based on available funding. The City has begun to award pavement rehabilitation contracts based on these recommendations. 2008 Annual Report 33 1-46 June 2008 Recommendation: Contracts should continue to be awarded based on recommendations in response to the Pavement Management System. 3.11 SCHOOLS Threshold Standard: The City of Chula Vista shall annually provide the two local school districts Chula Vista Elementary School District (CVESD) and Sweetwater Union School District (SUHSD), with a 12- 18 month forecast and request an evaiuation of their ability to accommodate the forecasted and continuing growth. The Districts' replies should address the following: 1. Amount of current capacity now used or committed. 2. Ability to absorb forecasted growth in affected facilities. 3. Evaluation of funding and site availability for projected new facilities. 4. Other relevant information the Districts desire to communicate to the City and GMOC. Threshold Finding: CVESD - In Compliance SUHSD - In Compliance 3.11.1 School District Accomplishments Comment: Both school districts indicate that additional facilities will be required to accommodate growth in the next five years, and that they will be constructed when funding is available. Sweetwater Union HiClh School District o A grade 7-12 campus is planned for Otay Ranch Village 11 within the next five years. o Proposition 0 passage will allow the District to continue modernization and limited new construction efforts on the west side. Capacity exists currently on the east side with the 2006 opening at Olympian High School (High School 13). A campus for grades 7-12 has completed design and will complete DSA approval by mid-2008. It is positioned to start construction, but is not needed untii 2010 (projected). The site has been acquired. Construction on Proposition 0 projects in 2009 will include Hilltop High School, Chula Vista High Schooi and Chula Vista Middle School. o The District has a three-story campus design with grades 7-8 on a portion of the campus and a 9-12 campus adjacent with shared service facilities. For Middle School 12/High School 14, construction will commence in 2009, if needed. Site selection, architectural review, funding identification for land and construction, commencement of site preparation, and service by utilities and road have all been completed. 2008 Annual Report 34 1-47 June 2008 Chula Vista School Elementary District o Additional schools will be constructed in Otay Ranch Villages 2 and 11, as needed to serve students moving into Otay Ranch, and as state funding becomes available. o The District has a two-story design planned for the Village 11 school site. Eventually, it will be used In Village 2 and the Eastern Urban Center, as well. 3.12 OTHER TOPICS 3.12.1 Comprehensive Growth Management Program ("Top-to-Bottom") Review In 2003, at the request of City Council, a comprehensive review of the Chula Vista Growth Management Program (commonly known as the "Top-to-Bottom" review) was Initiated with the support of the GMOC. This was the first comprehensive review and updating of the Program since its inception, over 15 years ago. Interaction with the GMOC and others in carrying out a comprehensive review of the City's Growth Management Program documents/components was spearheaded in 2004 by the GMOC Coordinator, Dan Forster, and the City's consultant, Walter Kieser of Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS). The review was designed to keep Chula Vista on the cutting edge of growth management efforts, and included review and amendment of four documents/components: o The General Plan Growth Management Element; o The Growth Management Program Document; o The Growth Management Ordinance; and o Portions of the Threshold Standards. City Council provided input at a workshop on May 27, 2004, after a "White Paper" summarizing review of the above documents/components was presented, which described issues, ideas, and options for changes. Based on Council's input, an interactive process involving operating departments, various stakeholders, and the GMOC was undertaken to prepare proposed draft revisions to the General Plan Growth Management Element and Threshold Standards, and to prepare a new Growth Management Guidelines Document to replace the Growth Management Program Document. The 2005 GMOC Annual Report included a synopsis and recommendations for changes to the General Plan Growth Management Program and Threshold Standards. City Council's adoption of the 2005 GMOC Annual Report in August 2005 approved those recommended changes in concept, and provided direction to staff to finalize the documents for formal consideration. Since that time, the revised General Plan Growth Management Element was adopted as part of City Council's approval of the General Plan Update (GPU) in 2008 Annua/ Report 35 1-48 June 2008 December 2005, and pre-final drafts of the revised Growth Management Guidelines Document and Threshold Standards were routed for departmental and administration reviews in November-December 2005. Staff and EPS also began work on corresponding revisions to the Growth Management Ordinance. In January 2006, Mr. Forster, the GMOC Coordinator, left the City for employment elsewhere, and the Top-to-Bottom process paused while remaining staff focused on completing the GMOC's annual reviews. However, we are now at a point where we intend to focus resources on completing the remaining Top- to-Bottom documents/components, including: 1) Growth ManaGement Guidelines Document - A new Growth Management Guidelines Document contains the implementing policies and procedures for the Growth Management Program, and replaces the existing Growth Management Program Document and the "Policy, Thresholds/Standards and Growth Management Oversight Commission" Document. The combined Guidelines document format will provide clearer, more up-to- date documentation by eliminating duplication and outdated information. It will also clarify that the City's Growth Management "Program" is the collection of all provisions and regulations, not just the name of one of the related documents. Under the pending revisions, for instance, the Ordinance contains the requirement to prepare Public Facilities Finance Plans (PFFP's), while the Guidelines Report sets forth the details for their contents and administration. 2) Growth Manaqement Ordinance - The updated Growth Management Ordinance is pending, providing the legal underpinning. 3) Portions of the Threshold Standards - Some of the main changes for particular thresholds are summarized below: Libraries - In addition to square footage standards for library facilities, the currently adopted Threshold Standard already includes language referencing "adequately equipped and staffed." The revised Threshold Standard language also specifies "with appropriate hours of operation." Parks and Recreation - The existing threshold standard calls for three acres of neighborhood and community park land with appropriate facilities per 1,000 residents east of Interstate-805. The revised threshold standard references a citywide standard of three acres of public parkland per 1,000 residents for new development. In addition to the existing "appropriate facilities" language, text is added to include "adequately staffed with appropriate hours of operation." Police - Recognizing the higher priority associated with Emergency Response (Priority 1) calls for service in comparison to Urgent Response (Priority 2) calls, the implementation measure for Priority 2 calls if the threshold is not satisfied because of growth-related impacts would be a "Statement of Concern", rather than consideration of a moratorium. It is also recognized that response time is not the only factor that defines whether Police services are being maintained. 2008 Annual Report 36 1-49 June 2008 Fire/Emergency Medical Services - The Threshold Standard is more clearly defined for growth management purposes to include dispatch, turnout, and travel time to the building address. Traffic - An "urban street level of service" standard is added to the Traffic Threshold Standard. The Guidelines Report also references the importance of maintaining a safe and efficient system for additional travel modes, such as walking, bicycling, and transit. Another change is that if a Traffic threshold failure is predicted within three years, a "Statement of Concern" could be issued to offer additional tools for addressing the anticipated problem. Schools - The Schools Threshold Standard is revised to specifically indicate that "accommodation" refers to physical facilities and not programs. It also allows for the analysis of sub-areas to consider differing situations in developed and undeveloped parts of the City. Less significant changes are proposed for the following Threshold Standards: Fiscal - Threshold language is added to clarify the intent that the City is developing land uses that are providing an adequate tax base for provision of services currently and over the next five years. Air Quality - Revised threshold language references compliance with all applicable federal, state and regional air quality regulations. Sewer - Threshold language is modified to consider budgeted system improvements as well as the current system; to provide five-year forecasts in addition to shorter-term forecasts; and to reference capacity in the Metro sewer system and the status of Chula Vista's share. Water - Threshold language is added clarifying the intent of water service availability letters to confirm that adequate water supplies are available to serve new development. Also, five-year forecasts are to be provided in addition to shorter-term forecasts. Drainage - Current local, state and federal regulations, as they may be amended from time to time, are referenced. Other changes to implementation measures include the following. References to moratoriums - The current Growth Management Program contains a provision that if there is a threshold failure for Police, Fire, Traffic, or Parks (if not remedied within three years), "the City Council shall schedule and hold a publiC hearing for the purpose of adoptinq a moratorium on the acceptance of new tentative map applications." Recommended changes are to: 1) make use of a moratorium a consideration (the new language is: "the City Council shall schedule and hold a public hearing for the purpose of considerinq the adoption of a moratorium"), and 2) tie a moratorium to issuance of building 2008 Annua/ Report 37 1-50 June 2008 permits, rather than approval of new tentative subdivision map applications, recognizing that thousands of dwelling units could be in process with approved tentative maps, but with building permits not yet issued. Use of statements of concern - An additional change regarding implementation measures is that if the GMOC identifies a problem regarding compliance with a threshold, the Commission would have broader latitude to issue a "Statement of Concern" (i.e., for any of the thresholds), and may make specific recommendations to the City Council regarding what actions the City may take to assist in resolving the probiem. Growth rate monitoring and limitation . One of the most important changes resulting from the Top-to-Bottom review is establishing the use of additional controis of the rate of development activity. Under provisions added, the City Council may, on the basis of recommendations provided by the GMOC and making specified findings, impose an annual limit or other rate control on building permits. Process chanqe - Currently, it is stipulated that the GMOC Annual Report be forwarded to the City Council "via the Planning Commission". In practice, the Annual Report is presented to the Planning Commission and City Council in a joint session with the GMOC. Since a Planning Commission representative is one of the designated GMOC members, and the GMOC is an advisory body to the City Council, this change provides for the Planning Commission to receive the report at the same time it is sent to the Council. Thus, the Planning Commission retains an important role in the process, but a separate Planning Commission action is not required as a prerequisite for final Council action. Further refinements - Some further revisions have been crafted as the draft documents were re-circulated for internal review given the time that elapsed since their prior consideration. The additional refinements include: · Adding language to the Introduction (page 1) in the Guidelines Report to provide further recognition of the relationship and interplay between growth and overall "quality of life" considerations that may transcend the impacts attributable to growth. · Providing clarification in the Ordinance regarding the role and contents of the Growth Management Guidelines Report. · Adding brief descriptions of Water Conservation Plans (WCP's) and Air Quality Improvement Plans (AQIP's). · Clarifying the role and standing of Facility Master Plans and related plans, such as strategic plans, in the Components Chapter (Chapter IV) of the Guidelines Report. · Creating a consolidated "Financing Program" section in the Guidelines Report in lieu of the "Related Financing Program" subsections under several threshold topics in prior drafts. 2008 Annual Report 38 1-51 June 2008 3.12.2 3.12.3 . Further refining the Traffic Threshold urban street level of service standard. . Further refining the Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard and implementation measure language. . Clarifying the focus on the impacts of new development with respect to the Drainage Threshold. . Emphasizing the City's overall financial health in the Fiscal Threshold. . Other editorial changes to ensure internal consistency between the Ordinance and the Guidelines Report. In moving to complete the process, staff briefed and re-oriented the current GMOC membership to the remaining three draft documents/components; walked the GMOC through the purpose, intent and content of the draft documents/components; and sought their final input as part of this year's GMOC process. Drafts, which embody the content and changes endorsed by the GMOC prior to October 2006, have been prepared, but have not undergone final review; therefore, they are not ready to be forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council for action. Public Comments Throughout the course of the annual review process, public comments were received. Any formal comments received and associated responses are included in the Appendices. They include: 1. "Parks" Threshold Standard in GMOC Ordinance, by Peter Watry 2. Suggested Changes to the GMOC Ordinance, by Peter Watry (February 2008) 3. Top-to-Bottom Review of Threshold Standards, by Peter Watry (April 3, 2008) Parks and Recreation The existing threshold standard calls for three acres of neighborhood and community park land with appropriate facilities per 1,000 residents east of Interstate 805. The revised threshold standard references a citywide standard of three acres of public park land per 1,000 residents for new development. In addition to the existing "appropriate facilities" language, text is added to include "adequately staffed with appropriate hours of operation." Additionally, the Guidelines call for assurance that parks developed with funding from new residential growth west of Interstate 805 be developed within that area. 2008 Annual Report 39 1-52 June 2008 4.0 POTENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CHANGES 4.1 GMOC Retreat and Informal Discussion Session The GMOC convened on Saturday, October 20, 2007 in the Ken Lee Building Conference Room for a retreat and informal discussion regarding existing and future thresholds that may be entertained during the next GMOC cycle. The discussion included the following topics: o The role of the commission, as overseeing the management of growth or quality of life issues o The need to ask the right questions of staff o The necessity of re-crafting the questionnaires o The necessity of revising the process (concentration on product rather than on process) o Thresholds review with the consultant, Walter Kieser of EPS, was submitted to staff in November 2006 and needs to be finalized as part of the Top-to-Bottom review directive from Council. The commissioners discussed the 11 quality of life indicators. Following summarizes their discussions: 4.1.1 Fiscal o The Fiscal threshold standard could possibly have two fundamental changes: DIF system should be growth paying its way, not putting a strain on the City, per the existing 20 years' review; and overall fiscal health. o The commissioners discussed DIF and cross-use by departments 4.1.2 Air Quality o Air quality is a regional issue, difficult to monitor o Steps should be taken with new development to reduce emissions o APCD reports and other reports for iatest data should be given to GMOC; RAZ Strategy is on a 5-year cycle; conservation is a long-term rather than knee-jerk reaction 4.1.3 Sewer o o Sewer relies on engineering standards; plumbing is sufficient Flow collection and treatment is monitored by the City with metering 4.1.4 Water o Water-flow proposed decrease ruling 2008 Annual Report 40 1-53 June 2008 4.1.5 4.1.6 4.1.7 4.1.8 Libraries o There is no moratorium on Libraries. The City still has options to achieve compliance. If there are inadequate funds for a new facility, then the existing facilities should be improved, although given a lesser degree of priority. According to the Library Master Plan, the sq/k included Rancho del Rey, the EUC in Otay Ranch and the overlap of 10k square feet in Eastlake High School. o Drainage o There are drainage problems at Telegraph Canyon Road/Olympic Parkway due to inadequate maintenance. Parks & Recreation The disparity of park acreage on the west side of Chula Vista versus the east side. The 3 acre/1 k baseline was established in the 1980s for the east side; the GMOC should focus on Parks & Recreation ancillary facilities and/or joint usage where land is not readily available. This should be factored into a revised threshold for the City. It was noted that the San Diego Golf Course should be counted towards the park acreage of western Chula Vista; all recreation/parks opportunities should be accounted for. But it was clarified that that golf courses and OVRP are not part of Chula Vista's threshold standard, which only evaluates City-owned parks. Some pocket areas exist in western Chula Vista that can be converted to parks, so attaining the standard or getting close to it is possible. It was also noted that recreation areas for adults was an important consideration. Police The numbers in the threshold standard are from the 1980's. The threshold standard should be revised with a new base of standards that are more current. The volume of calls for service has increased as the City has grown. 4.1.9 Fire 4.1.10 The threshold standard includes dispatch, turnout and travel in its statistics. The volume of calls for service has increased as the City has grown. Traffic Traffic expectations were different for different streets, using the same measure, With Top-to-Bottom, the threshold standard should be modified regarding the west side of the City. Gridlock at the trolley and at various intersections needs to be addressed. Mitigate with SANDAG. Flow of cars and pedestrians should be considered. The City is synchronized to CalTrans intersections around freeways. 2008 Annual Report 41 1-54 June 2008 o Traffic issues compounded at times of schools drop-off and pick-up, should have school districts educate students and parents on the negative impact. 4.1.11 Schools o Ad Hoc Schools Task Force should be involved to address safety patrols and traffic/safety etiq uette o The threshold standard addresses their ability to serve/accommodate After discussions, it was agreed that: · the GMOC will not impose on policy decisions at department or agency level; . the GMOC should get educated and understand the dynamics of departments and agencies; . the GMOC's typical process should be to hone in on specific problem issues, not revisiting issues that have already been resolved in previous cycles; · the GMOC's report should get to the Council on time to affect decisions on funding, budget time; · the GMOC should recommend to the Council that they share/forward the GMOC's determination to the specific oversight groups . the structure of the meetings should be more streamlined, with the last 10 minutes dedicated to new business . the previous year's cycle started late, this year the commission should aim at having the draft of the report out by the end of April in order to get public feedback. . should the Annual Report should be serial . the commission would decide which issues of the questionnaires should be raised for discussion . the format for the meetings should have the first half of the meeting addressing and discussing the items from the questionnaire, and the last half of the meeting should include drafting related input for the annual report . the November meeting should be focused on the group tailoring the questionnaires to be sent out, with possibly two meetings in December (to discuss the Forecast), and January to March. The draft calendar would be distributed at the first meeting. 4.2 2007 Plannina Commission/City Council Referrals The following is a comment or "referral" from the joint City Council/GMOCfPlanning Commission meeting held on August 2, 2007. The referral was reviewed by the GMOC and included in the 2008 Annual Report. Fiscal: In the future, a report should be provided to City Council when a priority project was established that would required funding to be shifted from another project so the Council would better understand the implications of the expenditures they approve and the ability to provide the facilities that the neighborhoods expect and deserve. Review with the Department of Finance and Office of Budget Analysis to ensure that 8% of reserve capacity during future reviews is set aside for the fiscal health of the City. 2008 Annual Report 42 1-55 June 2008 5.0 AQpendices 5.1 Appendix A - Public Comments 5.2 Appendix B - Growth Forecast 5.2 Appendix C - Threshold Compliance Questionnaires 2008 Annual Report 43 1-56 June 2008 1-57 ATTACHMENT 3 Appendices A-C 1-58 APPENDIX A Public Comments re: "Parks" threshold standard in GMOC Ordinance by Peter Watry INTRODUCTION The suggested new threshold for Parks (p. 9) in the GMOC Ordinance Draft distributed for the last meeting was "Population ratio: Three (3) acres per 1,000 population of public parkland with appropriate facilities shall be provided for new development citywide." Eastern Chula Vista has long met and acceded that goal, but that goal seems impossible ever for the west side of Chula Vista. And "for new development," I cannot imagine what that means in practical terms for the west side. HISTORY In I 987, when we originally did the thresholds, 3 acres per 1,000 seemed to be the standard. There was a moratorium on development in place at the time, and one can imagine how the developers hated that moratorium. But as you know, the possibility of a moratorium is the "enforcer" for this Ordinance, and so that is a very serious matter. So at the time we did not even imagine including western Chula Vista in the Parks threshold because that would have meant that the developers were instantly in violation of the Ordinance. Therefore the threshold was simply 3 acres per 1,000 on the east side of Chula Vista, with nothing said about the west side. I compliment the GMOC for now including the west side. The question is, what threshold is appropriate for the older west side? Certainly it can never be 3 acres per 1,000. DEFlNING "WESTERN CHULA VISTA" There is a vast amount of <'parkland" acreage associated with the Chula Vista Nature Center, and there is going to be a lot of parkland in the ultimate redevelopment of the Bayfront. But no one lives there. We who live on the west side of Chula Vista live between 1-5 and I-80S. The redevelopment of the Bayfront is being done by the Port District, and all the new parkland will be on Port property. The Port is adamant about the fact that they are responsible to all the people of California, and not just Chula Vista. The redeveloped Bayfront will be a regional (or even national) asset when it is developed, and Gaylord is there, etc. And the Nature Center, of course, is already a regional asset. We westem Chula Vistans live between 1-5 and I-80S, and that is where "our" parkland is and will be. That is where we will take our families for picnics and our kids to play. {::URRENT STATUS OF PARKLAND IN "WESTERN' CHULA VISTA So what is the current status of parkland acreage per 1,000 population between 1-5 and I-80S? 1t is currently.91 acre per 1,000 -- about one-fourth of what it is on the e'astem side ofChula Vista (3.5). Now I am not complaining - it is just an accident of history, and 1 am happy that our threshold for the east side ofChula Vista, developed 20 years ago, is doing so well. 1-59 KOA There is one large area in west Chula Vista that is a possibility. There are about 37 vacant acres adjacent to the east of the KOA Kampground. That whole area, including the KOA Kampground, is designated as "open space/active recreation" with an overlay of a Community Park on the new Chula Vista General Plan adopted in December 2005. Unfortunately, a developer is now processing a plan to build 500-600 condos on that entire property. We in the neighborhoods are fighting as hard as we can to preserve this last possibility for a Community Park on the west side. If a 35-acre Community Park was developed there, that would raise the ratio on the west side to 1.2 acres per 1,000. Not much, but at least in the right direction. In addition, as you all know, the Urban Core Specific Plan has been adopted for the urban redevelopment of western Chula Vista. When implemented, that is scheduled to increase the population in western Chula Vista by 31 %. Where will parks be built? RECOMMENDED THRESHOLD FOR "PARKS" FOR WESTERN CHULA VISTA 1. That for purposes of the "Parks" threshold, western Chula Vista be defined as that part ofChula Vista between 1-5 and 1-805. 2. That an Interim Goal for "Parks" in western Chula Vista be 1.5 acres per 1,000 population. That would at least give everyone a benchmark by which to gauge whether progress in parkland is being made in western Chula Vista or not. Even an Interim Goal of 1.0 would at least be a realistic goal, and probably not easy to maintain when the urban core starts developing. ~.. 1-60 SUGGESTED CHANGES TO THE GMOC ORDINANCE From Peter Watry February 2008 Underlined: My adds Striko out::; -- deleted from October 2006 Draft Parks and Recreation: 1. Population ratio: Three (3) acres per 1,000 population of public parkland with appropriate factilities shall be provided for new development citywide. 2. For that portion of older western Chula Vista that lies between 1-5 and I-80S. an Interim Goal or Threshold of 1.0 acres per 1.000 population shall be the standard by which progress will be monitored. 3. These Park and Recreation facilities are to be determined per the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and. . . . . . . etc. Traffic: 1. Arterial Street Level of Service Standard: Maintain LOS "C" or better as measured by observed average travel speed on signalized arerial segments except that during peak hours a LOS "D" can occur for no more than any two hours of the day. 2. Urban Street Level of Service Standard: Roadway segments designated as Urban Streets shall maintain LOS "D" or better as measured by observed or predicted average travel speed except that during peak hours a LOS of "E" can occur for no more than two hours per day. Thc City Council, by rcsolution, can cxempt partieBJ.ar urban signa-liz:cd arterial scgmcnts if achicving this sta-ndard is dctcI'fllinca to bc physically Of finffileiaHy infeafliblc. If a particular urban signalized intersection consistentlv fails the standard. the GMOC may recommend to the City Council that they. bv resolution. exemJlt that particular intersection. 1-61 April 3,2008 TO: The Members of the GMOC SUBJECT: Top to Bottom Review of Threshold Standards Dear Chainnan O'Neill and Members of the GMOC Crossroads II has reviewed the Draft Individual Threshold Standards (red- lined version, undated). We support most of the recommended changes. We are particularly happy to see the new section on Fiscal. However we do have some concerns about the language in two of the sections: Traffic and Parks & Recreation. We respectfully submit the following comments for your consideration: Traffic: We strongly object to the following sentence under draft Threshold Standard 2. "The City Council, by resolution, can exempt particular urban signalized arterial segments if achieving the standard is determined to be physically or financially infeasible." We believe the GMOC should be part of this process. We suggest instead, "If a particular urban signalized arterial segment consistently fails the standard, the GMOC may recommend to the City Council that they, by resolution, exempt that particular intersection." Parks and Recreation: Our understanding is that the ratio of parks to 1,000 population in western Chula Vista (between 1-5 and I-80S) is .91, far below the recommended citywide threshold for new development. To help remedy the imbalance between parks on the east side and parks on the west side, we recommend adding a new Goal, no. 2: 'To improve the current ratio of parks to population that exists in the area between 1-5 and I-80S." In addition we recommend inclusion of a new "Threshold C. For that portion of Chula Vista that lies between 1-5 and I-80S, an interim threshold of 1 acre per 1,000 population shall be the standard by which progress will be monitored." We hope you will seriously consider these recommendations. Best Wishes, Peter Watry, Vice- President 1-62 APPENDIX B Growth Forecast 1-63 Wednesday, December 12, 2007 City of Chula Vista 2007 Annual Growth Management Review Cycle RESIDENTIAL GROWTH FORECAST Years 2008 Through 2012 Preliminary Five- Year Growth Forecast, December 2007 1-64 INTRODUCTION As a component of the City of Chula Vista's Growth Management Program, the City's Planning Division provides annual growth forecasts for two time frames: 12 to 18 months and five years. Given timing for this year's forecast release, the short-term forecast covers the 14 months from November 2007 through December 2008; and the five-year forecast extends through calendar year 2012. The forecast information in this document, including figures and tables, are delineated under the following headings: . Forecast Summary . Forecast Information o Background o East Chula Vista o West Chula Vista . Forecasted Population This information is provided to enable City departments and other service agencies to assess the potential impacts that growth may have on maintaining compliance with the City's eleven growth management quality-of-life Threshold Standards (Fire and Emergency Medical Service; Police; Traffic; Parks and Recreation; Drainage; Libraries; Air Quality; Fiscal; Schools; Sewer; and Water). With this data, these bodies will be able to report possible threshold impacts to the Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) as part of their annual compliance questionnaire. Through the City's growth management review process, the GMOC will provide a set of recommendations to the City Council regarding maintenance and/or revisions to each of the City's Threshold Standards. Those recommendations can include such actions as the addition or acceleration of capital projects, hiring personnel, changing management practices, slowing the pace of growth, or considering a moratorium. The City Council will ultimately decide what course of action to take. Commonly referred to as the Growth Management or GMOC forecast, it is important to note that this forecast: . Does not represent a goal or desired growth rate; . Is what may occur given a set of assumptions (presented on page 2); . Is produced by the City and not necessarily endorsed by home builders; and . Represents a "worst-case" or more liberal estimate to assess maximum possible effects to the City's threshold standards. Preparing a five-year forecast always incorporates a fair degree of uncertainty as to market conditions. The forecast is a disclosure of residential projects that have been or are undergoing the entitlement process, and could potentially be approved and permitted for construction within the next five years. These projects are under the City's control with respect to the standard entitlement process time frames. As such, these numbers do not refiect market conditions outside the City's control. 2 Preliminary Five- Year Growth Forecast, December 2007 1-65 The current forecast period could present a potential challenge given the downward trends in the housing market that are influenced by a variety of factors outside the City's control. Based on the cyclical nature of upswing and downturns in the housing market, this cycle is in a downturn, and a return to equilibrium would be anticipated in the future. Given this current downward trend in residential construction, inventories would be expected to be absorbed, but at a lower pace. This forecast report highlights projected growth in both the eastern and western portions of the City. While the majority of the forecast remains in the east, increased infill and redevelopment in western Chula Vista is starting to take place and will continue in the future. FORECAST SUMMARY Over the next fourteen months (November 2007 - December 2008) as many as 1,313 housing units could potentially be permitted for construction in eastern Chula Vista, and about 127 housing units could be permitted in western Chula Vista, for a citywide total of approximately 1,440 units (see Figure 1 - Forecasted Residential Units Permitted By Area 2008 Through 2012). In the five-year forecast period (calendar years from 2008 through 2012), eastern Chula Vista may have as many as 6,845 housing units permitted, and 1,301 in western Chula Vista. This totals 8,146 units citywide, with an annual average of 1,369 units in the east and 260 in the west, or approximately 1,629 housing units permitted per year, on average citywide (see Figure 1, Table 1 - Eastern Chula Vista Residential Development Forecast, and Table 2 - Western Chula Vista Residential Development Forecast). In order for the City of Chula Vista to accommodate this growth and maintain the quality of life there must be the concurrent development of necessary public facilities and services. It is the role of the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) to assess if the established quality of life standards are being met and to make recommendations to the City Council to ensure future compliance. The following discussions and figures describe the context, conditions and assumptions behind the forecast, and are provided to further qualify that this forecast is a fluid planning tool and not a prediction or guaranteed expectation. FORECAST INFORMATION Backqround As depicted on Table 3, (Historic Housing and Population Growth - City of Chula Vista 1980- 2007), the number of houses constructed in Chula Vista has fluctuated from a few hundred units a year to over 3,000 (as in 2001), with an average of approximately 1,400 units per year over the last 26 years. Several market cycles have occurred, with decline in the number of units permitted in the early 1980's (average 330 units) and 90's (average 693 units), and since 2005. The record 3,525 unit permits issued in 2001 represents a peak of residential permits rather than an average or a norm. 3 Preliminary Five- Year Growth Forecast, December 2007 1-66 Whiie this forecast reflects the current deceleration of construction activity in Chula Vista, it is representative of the region, and rebound in construction can be anticipated. This stems from a few factors, including the following: . The limited General Plan housing capacity among some of the region's other cities; . The comparatively lower average price of housing in areas south of Interstate 8; and . The amount of vacant land and housing capacity within approved master planned projects in eastern Chula Vista. Between the years 1996 and 2001 the number of units steadily increased from about 1,000 units to a peak of over 3,500 housing units receiving building permits. A significant part of this is attributable to the onset of construction in the Otay Ranch project and other eastern Chula Vista rnaster planned communities. Since 2001 the average annual number of units receiving permits for construction has been approximately 2,200. The past year has also seen increasing interest rates, a correspondent slowing of housing development within the region, and a decrease in the number of new dwelling units permitted for construction in Chula Vista. The extent to which these trends continue, it may influence this forecast in a downward direction. Figure 2 (Summary: Residential Units Receiving Building Permits 1996 to 2007 and 2008 through 2012 Forecast) reflects the dramatic changes that have occurred between 2006 and 2007 (a reduction of nearly 730 units). These changes are based on a number of factors: . Rising interest rates; . Rising housing and construction costs; and . The ability of the public to qualify for mortgage loans. The following forecast assumptions for eastern and western Chula Vista are predicated upon the following: 1. That there are no additional building "caps" imposed on development that would restrict the number of units below what is forecasted. 2. That public policy regarding development remains otherwise unchanged. 3. That Growth Management thresholds are not exceeded. 4. That the housing market makes corrections within two to three years. 5. That the General Plan Update deferral area in Otay Ranch is resolved in year 2008, and SPA processing commences. 6. That projects follow a normal project regulatory processing schedule. Eastern Chula Vista Growth for the next fourteen months in eastern Chula Vista is based upon the overall assumptions. The various planned communities have a number of projects in the processing "pipeline" with 1,313 units potentially ready for permitting over the next fourteen months. Otay Ranch Villages 2, 6, 7 and 11 have all their entitlements and are actively under construction. It is anticipated that the next five years could produce as many as 6,845 additional housing units permitted for construction in eastern Chula Vista, for an average annual rate of approximately 1,369 units. This number is derived primarily from approved development plans, and estimated 4 Preliminary Five- Year Growth Forecast, December 2007 1-67 project-processing schedules for project plan reviews, subdivision maps, and building plans. (Table 1 Attachment). In addition, it assumes that the Eastern Urban Center, Villages 4, 8 and 9 in Otay Ranch have obtained entitlements. As of November 2007, the remaining capacity for residential units that could be permitted in eastern Chula Vista is approximately 15,200, based on the General Plan Update, adopted in December, 2005. If 6,845 units could be permitted over the next five-years forecasted period, there would be 8,355 units remaining. Given the current rate of growth, this capacity could potentially be built out around 2020. However, additional General Plan Amendments could occur, resulting in additional units added to the potential inventory of housing units, thereby extending the ultimate build-out date. Western Chula Vista Western Chula Vista has not shown significant increases in housing since the growth management program was instituted in the late 1980's. This situation is changing, due to an increased interest in infill, redevelopment, and density increases through the General Plan Update adopted in December 2005, and the adopted Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP) and possibly the future Bayfront Master Plan. Several projects have been completed in recent years, particularly along Broadway, reflective of development interest in western Chula Vista. As shown on Table 2, several other projects have been applied for by developers and are under City review for entitlements. These are shown with double asterisks. The Third Avenue Village ENA and E Street Transit Village Exclusive Negative Agreement are both within the UCSP area. There are other projects that are not included in this year's forecast because of their uncertainty in the entitlement process. In the short-term, there are several projects in the approval process that constitute up to an additional 127 units that could be permitted within calendar year 2008. In addition, there are also several projects with development potential in the Northwest and additional infill and accessory units that may potentially be permitted (see Figure 1). Over the next five years western Chula Vista could potentially experience an increase of 1,215 multi-family residential units, primarily due to 1) Pending approvals from the City, which would include the initial phases of Bayfront development, commencing by the end of 2010, and 2) Several other small to mid-size projects currently being processed are also reflected, including those of the current ENA projects (Third Ave. and E Street). A small addition of accessory units tracking at an average of five per year for 25 units, and some infill single family homes totaling about 86 units are also included in the five-year period. This provides a total of 1,301 residential units for an annual average of 260 units (see Table 2 and Figure 3). FORECASTED POPULATION This report focuses on the forecasted residential units as the primary indicator to measure future population increases. Western Chula Vista (as evidenced by U.S. Census data) has been undergoing growth in the form of demographic changes as the average household size increases; 5 Preliminary Five- Year Growth Forecast, December 2007 1-68 however, such growth is difficult to track on a year-to-year basis and is not reflected in this report's future population forecast. The California State Department of Finance estimates that Chula Vista has on average of 3.036 persons per household. Assuming that this estimate remains valid over the next five years, and assuming a 3% vacancy rate, Chula Vista can expect a total population of approximately 253,600 persons by the end of 2012. This is based on the following: . The California State Department of Finance (DOF) estimated a Chula Vista's population on January 1,2007 as 227,723; . An additional 642 units were occupied from January 1, 2007 to November 2007; and . An additional 8,146 units may be permitted between November 2007 and 2012. This is only a rough estimate for planning purposes, as the vacancy rate, persons per unit factors, and the number of actual units completed may vary. H :\PLANNING\GMOC\07 -08_ReviewCyclelPrelim_ Forecast3.doc 6 Preliminary Five- Year Growth Forecast, December 2007 1-69 Figure 1 Forecasted Residential Units Permitted By Area 2008 Through 2012 4000 II!iI East fiil West I 3500 3000 Zl '2 2500 ::l '0 .. 2000 Q) ,Q E :s 1500 Z 1000 500 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year 427 7 Preliminary Five- Year Growth Forecast, December 2007 1-70 Figure 2 Summary: Residential Units Receiving Building Permits 1996 to 2007 and 2008 through 2012 Forecast o 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year 8 Preliminary Five- Year Growth Forecast, December 2007 1-71 Figure 3 NORTH W, \"-"-"~\-"~"~~'\"-i_..j ! FIGURE 3 12 '\ '- j--" '.'-, --L..1 ~~#======"" j! / i /' ,~---- r~, .JJ L.._._J ! ,- ,/ r'-'-) ~''''''' i j 1-----\~ \ 1 '-'l...r-..-.._..J I -- -'- '. .- \ ..:t-, 11 13 ';:j--.J '~1,<,~<__~,-~_\~<:~~~:~-j ;-~,-- .' ,',-_, j ,.. t' -~, -.. \ ',...... ;,(~'i r.\ '\ j---, . \- / (-,.... " -1""--'- .-....) .-~ '.; )/ ~...........--...." ,___ ",,/ Co.~ ", /w/; __, J /' '" I _____' II \ " "- '. "~ II ,,' "---i " _/ ...._", -, ~'r/ ~, EHSl ~--: , i . ,,----- " -:-- '___.0---' I '\ ~ ~i:.I '] " 7- \ f~~-1; --r--- .----,',~--_if:" 1\ --- _~ -' ,iF!- " 31 ...........__L_.~'-"':-,. ....__'. ,..",.- ../ >-' ~'j'),"';; ~.._._,. I#~_/ \ ,}1J' . ~ ~ ~~. dt"';/~ 1 :. 14 - - d'Y'.. "'''. /-;:--/ ~ -..-'\': "''!i; 4 \. . 6 , I J 2"5 \ i 15 '-__oj' . ! - H ........ -;(\6~1i U .....""\J\SIZWl' [ _<fCt-.\jI'3 __-------------- (__ ,," 0 1 9 Residential Development forecast Map 1112007 - 1212012 >' <t+ ,. ,-x-;:''Co .~ ....,. \. \ --- ----- i r-"-"- ,-..i '-"-"""1 ; i. LIST OF CITYWIDE PROJECTS """\ \. -.- , Eastlake land Swap ~!f? A Villas Del Mar H Vetinos (Affordable Hsg) 1 Otay Ranch Village 2 , Eastlake Vistas . 248 Church Av ENA I TamatindoVillas 2 Otay Ranch Village . I. EastlakeWoods ~n C Mid Sayfront J Syacmore Estates 3 otay Ranch Village . 11 San Miguel Ranch 0 Creekside Vistas K Villa Hermosa . Otay Ranch Village 7 12 Bella Lago =Of E Trolley Villas L River Park Estates 5 Otay Ranch Village , 13 Rolling Hills Ranch CHUlA VJ5t.\ F Marsella Villas M N_.. . Otay Ranch Village . " Eastern Urban Center PLANNING DEPARTMENT G BayVista Walk N Oxford St {Concon:lia) 7 Otay Ranch Village 11 IS EI Dorado RidSje 9 Prefiminary Five. Year Growth Forecast, December 2007 1-72 ~ I ...... w Table 1 GMOC 2008 - EASTERN CHULA VISTA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FORECAST November 2007 - December 2012 .. ....,....;"'"". . Nov._;i.ooi.~~ P'f;I1MBt:!lioiie ;"';'"N;-..DE(;j:SER-2Q.Q9':_ -;,JA~~~ECE~B"R':illiD ' ,'"J""".(it:c:f.!'iJ.ll;R)!!f,l ,')A.H,'~D~:M.~ ),iln;~" . ;,q"".,', PROJECT i~ul!!:":~"~' ""j>))~$1JE"">i'-,-,:~:~~\: '1:~,,<::V' IS5UE"!~"- n,<:C ;.'~~':_J"1,iE'~- ""_.,)".,,,_,.... .' '_""""""""" ,n ~~~-~:';:":,::-,:' ',:"i ','- ,-"",y'-'J$SUIi,..-,,'/h,,' ..;.. ',.,-............. ....-.-,..,,,....-,,, . "F ':~ SF"';' ""If' ,'jl ,."sp'.,~ '. "NJ' '.5F';' 'Mf" . Sit: "'-::::,'MP'Y{'t,";'sii'>'.-' ::-':< HI -,-,-",.'5"'('; OTAV RANCH VlIIilge2 no " 2S<l '''' <00 175 <00 200 '00 2S<l ,,, " 1726 '00 VUlClge4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 . 0 0 100 ~_6 66 0 " 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 '" 0 Village 7 0 65 19 '" S<l '" S<l 100 67 57 0 65 '" Sl2 VillageS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1S<l 100 0 0 1S<l 100 Village 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '00 0 0 0 200 0 VllIage 11 " 5) '" 5' 200 J7 ,,, 0 0 0 " 5) 710 '" Eastern Urban center 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 ,<0 0 0 0 71' 0 OtavRanchSub-Total .., 133 533 361 692 36. 970 300 1,257 507 ." 133 3,874 1,661 EASTLAKE Greens (+land Swap) <2 0 54 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 <2 0 ll1 0 Vistil5(+Wlndstar) '" 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 10 '" 10 Woods 0 15 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 26 Sub-total 536 25 5. 11 15 0 . 0 0 0 53' 25 605 36 ROLLING HILLS RANCH 0 " 0 59 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 '" SAN MIGUEL RANCH (+5I'rlng Hill S"nlo,.,,) 0 57 " 70 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 57 " "7 El DORADO RIDGE 57 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 10< 0 ~ BELLA LAGO 0 J2 0 50 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 110 SUB-TOTAL 1,010 303 '" 5S1 707 512 970 300 1,257 507 1,010 3.3 4,672 2,173 TOTAL UNITS 1,313 1,279 1,219 1,270 1,764 1,313 6,845 Monthly Average: ,. Annual Average: 1,369 .ISSUEgBulldlngP",mlt -As5"mesAdopllonoflOO6GQPA ~ I ....., .po Table 2 GMOC 2008 - WESTERN CHULA VISTA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FORECAST November 2007 - December 2012 ':""'..," .. ., " .... "';/. ,- .: ."....... .. '....'.'..., ....':. "'C".;,e' '~~~;i;'!!.~G,i.i."'~~~~;);'I!!,~;.~t:,: j~~;:;\!~Cliiii~ o",~';()"rh:-"pE._~~:3~~, :--JAN;::...i-I)E;C.;~Oll:~ "....:..... "';-'f'" ,'-- .-.,.-.,~. li..~.; :~ '~-,,~;~ ~. J,~"",.,. .,,';,-" ,.,.".,. .. ",' ';!&iss'4~~;i~\?!!::{; ;':]''\";:'J~SUE*:,:!,(' -" ;;',i-"',"'i'. >,',n".,._ ......'.:. -,":.~,,;;._,,,, . -'- -', ':'<l."':'':' ';;;f':"'~QM.!\1\}.) '" ',;j,j:"-;"f,I5:SUI!~ \tjf_"':JIS$_U.E~R'r;:~' ~._,,__.. .. I ',_'.'.- ,_..co .. '. .." .... -, .. ',' . '. , '. ......... MF SF "'MP( 'F; '~_'::W~"F:;~)i; ,,"r,,,, (~:~M-f/;' "-;~!i'F:>F "'",,,i,: r~,;J:'$'f.,r~7 " "MP}1J1 1" , Bayfront Master Plan"'''' 0 0 0 0 260 0 260 0 260 0 0 0 780 0 248 Church Ave ENA Project'" '" 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 Creekside Vistas - 912-944 Third Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 0 0 0 162 0 Los Vecinos {Affordable Housing}- 1501 Broadway 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 42 0 .av Vista (Palomar Gateway) 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 Villas Del Mar - 160 N. Oel Ma< Ave 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 River Park Estates - 348 Palm Ave 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 Trolley Villas - 1350 Industrial Blvd. 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 Tamarindo - 3S Tamarindo Wv 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 Villa Hermosa - Main St. @ Maple Dr. 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 Marsella Villas - 778, 780, 790, 812, 808 Ada St. 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 41 0 Napa - 44S First Ave 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 Sycamore Estates Sycamore Dr. @ Walnut Dr. 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 Oxford St. . 267 E. Oxford St. 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 24 Second Accessory Units 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 25 SU8-TOTAL 83 44 170 27 280 S 260 S 422 S 83 44 1,215 86 TOTAL UNITS 127 197 28S 26S 427 127 1,301 Montnly 9 Averaqe: Annual Average: 260 * ISSUE = Building Permit n These projects are In conceptual discussion, and do not have specific project building plans under review at thIs time. Table 3 HISTORIC HOUSING AND POPULATION GROWTH CITY OF CHULA VISTA 1980 - 2007 - . <. . 'C .. ,,~.;..,:,~,," - ."--'," No. No. No. % Change 1980 407 374 84,384 1981 195 496 86,597 2.6% 1982 232 129 88,023 1.6% 1983 479 279 89,370 1.5% 1984 1,200 521 91,166 2.0% 1985 1,048 1,552 116,325 27.6% 2) 1986 2,076 1,120 120,285 3.4% 1987 1,168 2,490 124,253 3.3% 1988 1 ,413 829 128,028 3.0% 1989 1,680 1,321 134,337 4.9% 1990 664 1,552 138,262 2.9% 1991 747 701 141,015 2.0% 1992 560 725 144,466 2.4% 1993 435 462 146,525 1.4% 1994 700 936 149,791 2.2% 1995 833 718 153,164 2.3% 1996 914 820 156,148 1.9% 1997 1,028 955 162,106 3.8% 1998 1,339 1,093 167,103 3.1% 1999 2,505 1,715 174,319 4.3% 2000 2,618 2,652 183,300 5.2% 2001 3,525 3,222 190,300 3.8% 2002 2,250 2,923 199,700 4.9% 2003 3,143 2,697 209,133 4.7% 2004 3,300 3,043 217,543 4.0% 2005 1,654 2,525 223,423 2.7% 2006 1,180 1 ,448 227,723 1.9% 2007 454 642 229,613 0.8% 3) Annual Averaqe 1,348 1,355 5,187 2.9% (4) (1) Reflects Department of Finance (OOF) comprehensively revised population figures for the end of the referenced year. (2) Montgomery Annexation (3) Population estimates assume 3% vacancy rate and assuming that there are 3.036 persons per unit. This population figure is an estimate prior 10 California Department of Finance (OOF) preliminary figures due by February 2008 and final estimates in May 2008. (4) The annual average percentage is adjusted for the anomaly of the Montgomery Annexation. 12 Preliminary Five- Year Growth Forecast, December 2007 1-75 APPENDIX C Threshold Questionnaires 1-76 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 QUESTIONNAIRE Reporting Period: 7/1/06 - 6/30/07 to Current Time and Five- Year Forecast FISCAL l: THRFSHOI D STANDARDS' 1. The GMOC shall be provided with an annual fiscal impact report which provides an evaluation of the impacts of growth on the city, both in terms of Qperations and c"lPita/ improvements. This report should evaluate actual growth over the previous 12- month period, as well as projected growth over the next 12-18-month period, and 5-7- year period. 2. The GMOC shall be provided with an annual deve/ooment imoact fee report, which provides an analysis of development impact fees collected and eyoended over the previous 12-month period. Please provide b.rfuf responses to the following: 1. Please provide an updated Fiscal Impact Report showing an evaluation of the impacts of growth on the City's Operations and Capital. The evaluation should include the following three timeframes: a. the last fiscal year(07 -01-06 to 06-30-07); b. the current fiscal year, 2007/2008; and c. what is anticipated in five year's time. Please refer to the attached General Fund 5 Year Forecast report (Attachment 1). 2. According to the updated Fiscal Impact Report, how is the City's current fiscal health, and what are the primary growth-related fiscal issues facing the City? As stated in the forecast, the long-term financial outlook continues to identify structural challenges to the City's General Fund. Significant budgetary reductions were approved in the first half of fiscal year 2007-08. Additional budgetary reductions are being proposed to mitigate the continued decline in development and the slowdown in the economy. At this time, due to the significant slowdown in housing development, we do not anticipate any growth related fiscal issues. The fiscal challenges the City faces are due to the significant issues around the housing market and the slowdown in the economy. 3. Given the City's budget constraints, will you be able to continue to maintain current and projected level of service consistent with the threshold standards? At this time, due to the significant slow down in the housing market, we do not anticipate any growth related issues. On the contrary, due to the lack of growth and the slow down in the economy overall, it will be a challenge, as reflected in the forecast report, to continue City services at current levels. 4. What are the potential implications of a sustained building decline to the City's fiscal health and the ability to maintain threshold standards? 1 r>a1e71 The building decline has had a negative impact on the City's General Fund over the past two years. As development has slowed down, the City has made significant reductions in the general fund operating budget. With the combination of the housing crisis and the slowdown in the economy, it will be challenging to continue City services at current levels. 5. Please update the Development Impact Fee (DIF) table below for the period under review. TRANSPORTATION INTERIM PRE-SR 125 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 1 129452 TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE 4 576/acre 260513 14375 5539017 A ril1998 N/A Unscheduled TElE. CANYON GRAVITY SEWER 216.50/EDU 82 521 13291 970 881 Se t1998 N/A Dec 2008 PUMPED SEWER O/EDU 0 0 2880 Re ealed N/A N/A SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN 1 330/EDU 549 580 169411 1 909154 Au 2004 N/A Unscheduled POGGI CANYON SEWER BASIN 400/EDU 336 058 41334 2 284469 Dec 1997 N/A Jul 2008 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES Otay Ranch Villages 1, 5&6 1 114/SFDU 78 208 638 764 1185691 Feb 2007 N/A Oct 2007 Ota Ranch Villa e 11 1 865/SFDU 341 649 326 1 748698 Au 2005 Oct 2006 Oct 2007 PUBLIC FACiliTIES Administration 526/SFDU 201 099 573 603 2 278 389 Au 2006 Oct 2005 Oct 2007 Civic Center Ex ansion 2 188/SFDU 1514438 2 201 635 17284756 " " Police Facili 1 464/SFDU 512764 108150 1 653 478 Cor . Yard Relocation 393/SFDU 476 374 178 523 4683101 " " " Libraries 1 258/SFDU 605 735 1 543 042 7 209 688 " Fire Suppression S stems 1 106/SFDU 526 269 5 356 301 16905643 " " " Recreation Facilities 955/SFDU 108 777 878 389 6 356 068 " " PUBLIC FACiliTIES TOTAL 7 890/SFDU 3 945 456 10 839 643 5.290.923. "Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) shown. Fee varies by type of residential unit, and for commercial and industrial development _ see various fee schedules included in Attachment A. **Provide list of projects to be funded and/or completed over the next twelve months. 1p"i1>a For each of the funds: a. Are the available funds adequate to complete projects needed to meet the 12- to 18- month forecasted growth? If the funds are inadequate, is the City able to borrow necessary funds to complete the projects? b. Are the available funds adequate to complete projects needed to meet the 5- year forecasted growth? If the funds are inadequate, is the City able to borrow necessary funds to complete the projects? By their nature, additional revenues are received by DIF funds in times of development. These funds are then available to mitigate the impacts of the development paying the fees. This timeline is impacted by the need to construct large facilities, such as the civic center complex, police facility, and fire stations in advance of development. DIF projects are constructed via three financing scenarios: . cash-on-hand; . external debt financing; and . developer construction. If a facility is constructed or acquired using cash-on-hand, the fund provides direct financing using developer fees. This means of project financing has the greatest short term impact upon fund balance, and avoids financing costs. If the project is constructed via external debt financing the fund does not directly finance the project, but instead makes debt service payments over a given period of time. As development occurs, their DIF fees go to paying these debt obligations. This means of project financing has the smallest impact upon fund balance. The financing costs incurred in securing external financing increase overall project costs, and thereby increase the fees charged to developers. As DIF funds are unable to guarantee debt, all DIF debt obligations are secured by the City's General fund. In the instance of developer construction, the required facilities are constructed by the developer in exchange for a credit against their fee obligation. In this scenario, no fees are received by the City. The majority of Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) projects are constructed in this manner. For these projects, the TDIF's fund balance has a negligible impact on the timing of project construction. For each of the funds, the available fund balance as of June 30, 2007 is listed in the Development Impact Fee Overview table on the previous page. The adequacy of these funds to complete projects necessitated by either the 12- to 18- month or the 5 year forecasted growth will be determined by a number of factors including the actual rate of development (likely to fall significantly below the rate of development projected in the GMOC Forecast Report); and other fund obligations. These other obligations include existing debt service obligations, capital acquisitions, and program administration costs. In addition to these obligations, the City will also be working to create a debt service reserve in the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF) fund, which has a significant future debt service obligation. This reserve will mitigate the impacts of future swings in the development market on the fund's ability to meet its debt service obligations. The creation of this debt service reserve will further reduce the funds available for project expenditures in the near future. 11"'al.93 Based upon the PFDIF cash flow analysis (Attachment 2), it Is unlikely that the City will seek financing for the Rancho del Rey Library in the near future. The PFDIF currently has annual debt service payments of approximately$6.0 million which will utilize most of the cash flow coming into the fund. Once cash flows improve and reserves are replenished, financing options, including issuing debt or proposing a pay-as-you-go plan, will be reviewed for financial feasibility. Should the City issue debt to construct this facility, the PFDIF fee charged to developers would increase significantly. To seek financing today would require the General Fund to assume the debt service payments which would add to the existing financial challenges. c. Is the fee adequate or does it need to be revised? TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE TELE. CANYON GRAVITY SEWER SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN POGGI CANYON SEWER BASIN PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES Ota Ranch Villa es 1 5 & 6 Ota Ranch Villa e 11 PUBLIC FACILITIES Administration Civic Center Ex ansion Pollee Faclli Cor. Yard Relocation Libraries Fire Su ression S stems Recreation Facilities REVISE ADE UATE ADEQUATE REVISE ADE UATE REVISE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE d. In the "Expended" column, provide a list of the projects or facilities for which funds were expended. On a separate sheet of paper, provide a table that lists the amounts. Please see Attachment 3. 6. Please provide a list of the projects currently planned under each of the DIF Funds within the next 12 to 18 months. The applicable sections of the FY 2007-08 Capital Improvement Program Budget are attached to this report as Attachment 4 This report shows all current year CIP appropriations. 7. Please provide a list of the projects currently planned under each of the DIF Funds within the next five years. As a result of the recent volatility In DIF revenues, there are no additional CIP projects 1 Po&O planned in the next five years. Future CIP projects will be funded as development occurs and funds are available, after first accounting for outstanding debt and other fund obligations. FOI lOW-UP ON lAST YFAR'S RFPORT 8. Please provide a final copy of the Independent Financial Review prepared by EPS. Included as Attachment 5. MISCEII ANFOIIS 9. Do the current threshold standards need to be modified? Yes No _X_ If yes, please explain: 10. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council? SIIPPLEMFNTAI 11. Who, when and how of any transfers of DIF funds to other purposes, I.e., by council resolution, consent calendar, or direction of City Manager or other dept. head. All funds spent and / or transferred out of the DIF funds are authorized by the City Council as identified in the budget and consistent with legal requirements. 12. Is there a policy that requires identification of a source of repayment of diverted funds in a time appropriate manner? There is no diversion of City funds. If at any time the City Council authorizes inter-fund loans, the fiscal impact section of the staff report identifies the repayment terms. PREPARFn RY' Maria Kachadoorian Finance Director Karim Galeana Senior Accountant Tiffany Allen Fiscal and Management Analyst Date: 1 F'<l8e1s GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 QUESTIONNAIRE (Review Period: 7/1/06 - 6/30/07 to Current Time and Five Year Forecast) AIR QUALITY - City of Chula Vista THRESHOLD STANDARD The GMOC shall be provided with an annual report which: 1. Provides an overview and evaluation of local development projects approved during the prior year to determine to what extent they implemented measures designed to foster air quality improvement pursuant to relevant regional and local air quality improvement strategies. 2. Identifies whether the City's development regulations, policies and procedures relate to, and/or are consistent with current applicable Federal, State and regional air quality regulations and programs. 3. Identifies non-development related activities being undertaken by the City toward compliance with relevant Federal, State and local regulations regarding air quality, and whether the City has achieved compliance. The City shall provide a copy of said report to the Air Quality Pollution Control District (APCD) for review and comment. In addition, the APCD shall report on overall regional and local air quality conditions, the status of regional air quality improvement implementation efforts under the Regional Air Quality Strategy and related Federal and State programs, and the affect of those efforts/programs on the City of Chula Vista and local planning and development activities. Please provide brief responses to the following: 1. During the period under review, were there criteria to implement measures designed to foster air quality improvement pursuant to relevant federal, state, regional and/or local policies and regulations? If so, were they met? Since 2000 the City's Carbon Dioxide (C02) Reduction Plan has been the primary document guiding local air quality efforts. The Plan outlined transportation, land use and energy efficiency measures which would help reduce the community's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 20% below 1990 levels by 2010. Although the Plan focused on greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (C02), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N20), the measures also help reduce criteria air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (Sax), carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter (PM) which are detrimental to public health and are regulated under the federal Clean Air Act. In 2006, the City Council further lent support to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by passing resolutions in favor of the US Conference of Mayors' Climate Protection Campaign and the California Global Warming Solutions Act (AS 32). According to the 2005 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, Chula Vista community n').... ^;r (1, ,,,,Iih, n7 1-82 n~_.., i emissions have increased by 35% between 1990 and 2005. However, per capita emissions decreased by 17% overthe same period. While community-focused measures in the C02 Reduction Plan were voluntary, mandatory measures for City buildings and fleets created an 18% emissions reduction between 1990 and 2005. The City is currently in the process of updating its C02 Reduction Plan and has convened a "Climate Change Working Group" tasked with devising strategies to reduce GHG in the very short term. The Climate Change Working Group's recommendations are expected to be presented to Council in April 2008. 2. Are Chula Vista's development regulations, policies and procedures consistent with current applicable federal, state and regional air quality regulations and programs? Yes No 1- If not, please explain any inconsistencies, and indicate actions needed to bring development regulations, policies and/or procedures into compliance. Chula Vista's development practices have not yet been brought into compliance with elements of the City's municipal code. Specifically, the City is not in compliance with CVMC 20.04 (1982), which states that: All new residential units shall include plumbing specifically designed to allow the later installation of a systam which utilizes solar energy as the primary means of heating domestic potable water. In order to comply with this code, the City needs to inform applicants of this requirement in the early stages of the development process, and would need to make sure building inspectors verified installation of these systems during final inspections. Residential solar hot water systems reduce the burning of fossil fuels for home water heating, thus reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and criteria air pollutants. Recently, the California Energy Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission has stated that its goal is to make all new residential homes carbon neutral (I.e. no emissions from electricity or gas use) by 2020. It is expected that energy codes will become much stricter over the next decade in order to meet the carbon neutral goal. 3. Please list any non-development-related air quality programs/actions (eg. energy conservation, fuel-efficient vehicles, etc.) that the City is currently implementing or participating in. SOUTH BA Y POWER PLANT REMOVAL According to the Air Pollution Control District, the South Bay Power Plant (SBPP) is the third largest source of air pollutants in San Diego County and the largest in Chula Vista. Annual emissions of criteria air pollutants from the SBPP are approximately 2.3 million pounds. Over the last few years, City elected officials and staff have been researching options to close the SBPP. Even if it were replaced, a new plant would produce at least 20% less pollution than the current plant and greatly improve Chula Vista's air quality levels. ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM In partnership with San Diego Gas & Electric, the City has just completed the second year of a three-year program to promote energy efficiency throughout the community. By saving energy, the program helps improve local air quality by reducing the energy demand on power plants. Specifically, the program is working to increase energy-efficiency within residential and business sectors by exchanging FREE Compact Fluorescent Lights and Pre- Rinse Spray Valves (food service facilities only) for older, inefficient models. Thus far, approximately 1,200 Compact Fluorescent Lights and 500 Spray Valves have been exchanged for a total savings of 1.1 million kilowatt hours and 400 therms, respectively. The estimated carbon (i.e. GHG) reduction from the program is 444 tons C02 per year. For n"~ ^;~ n, ,,.,1;.,, 1i7 1-83 D..,....o" reference, 100 tons C02 is equivalent to the annual emissions of 16 passenger vehicles. The program is also working to promote energy-efficiency remodels and new construction by modeling the energy impacts of several design alternatives for two new urban infill projects. The City hopes to be able to apply the results of these models to other new projects to promote energy efficient design elsewhere. Energy-efficient construction will be further promoted in 2008 through a program designed to educate planning counter staff and building inspectors in the latest energy-efficient technology so that they can promote energy- efficient alternatives as part of the standard application process. The program is also working to promote energy effiCiency within the municipality itself by providing money for General Services Department staff to retrofit its facilities with newer energy-efficient technologies. Retrofit projects include upgrading lights, improving HVAC systems, and installing variable speed drives for chilled water, hot water, and air handling systems. Cumulatively, the retrofit projects will save the City 1.4 million kWh in annual energy consumption. The estimated carbon reduction from the program is 563 tons C02 per year. URBAN SHADE TREE PROGRAM In mid-2007 the City received a new grant from the California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection to expand its shade tree planting program over the next few years. This grant continued the work of an earlier project in which 460 new trees were planted along older residential streets. Shade trees help mitigate the Urban Heat Island Effect and improve air quality by removing CO2, dust and other particulates. The new project will plant over 1,200 shade trees along residential streets, canyon parkways, and within community parks and will increase the air quality benefits associated with urban forests. To date, 180 trees have been planted with the help of 100 volunteers. The estimated carbon reduction from the program is 2,340 pounds C02 per year. ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES Vehicles using Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), hydrogen, and electricity have been incorporated into the municipal fleet. Recently, the City has been pursuing funds to reduce NOx emissions by 50% in the transit fleet by using a blend of hydrogen and CNG. In addition, the City is launching a new Nature Center shuttle bus which showcases hydrogen internal combustion engine (H2ICE) technology. Although transportation planning typically occurs at a more regional level, local infrastructure improvements will help Chula Vista be prepared for growing community demand for Alternative Fuel Vehicles and fueling stations. The City continues to seek funding to upgrade a CNG fuel dispenser at the Public Works Yard to accommodate the growing public demand for a convenient CNG fueling station. Presently, the nearest public CNG dispenser is 15 miles from the South Bay area. 4 Are there additional non-development-related program efforts that the City needs to undertake pursuant to federal, state or regional air quality regulations? Yes X No If yes, please list and provide a brief explanation of each. Based upon the enforcement thus far of AB32, it is becoming increasingly clear that cities will need to take GHG emissions into account when determining the impacts of growth. Any 1-84 actions that can be taken now to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or facilitate their easy reduction in the future will help mitigate the impacts of AB 32's very tough GHG reduction goals. As such, the City should begin by implementing existing codes and standards with the potential to reduce energy use, such as CVMC 20.04. Additionally, in areas where new infrastructure is being created, it is important that the City encourage infrastructure that allows for the easy transition to alternative energy. One opportunity is to require builders to locate electrical outlets that can be easily used for electric lawn mowers/blowers and plug-in electric vehicles. Another opportunity would be the placement of gas hook-ups in new homes' garages to facilitate a transition to natural gas vehicles. The City's Climate Change Working Group is currently considering which actions will have the most immediate impact on reducing the City's GHG emissions. The actions range from increasing the number of Alternative Fuel Vehicles in the City Fleet, to requiring routine energy assessments for businesses, to requiring LEED/Architecture 2030 certification for all new buildings. These recommendations will be presented to City Council in April 2008. FOLLOW-UP ON LAST YEAR'S REPORT 5. What is the status of the City's Carbon Dioxide (C02) Reduction Plan? From the Chula Vista 2005 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory: "In 2005, Chula Vista's total community GHG emissions were 960,639 tons eCO, representing a 35% increase compared to 1990 levels. Transportation emissions remained Ihe single largest source (approximately 48%) of citywide GHG emissions based on annualized Vehicle Miles Traveled. Emissions from residential electricity and natural gas use represented almost one-third of community emissions. Conversely, community GHG emission levels declined on a per capita, household and acre basis between the two inventory years. At the community level, carbon-reducing measures implemented over the last 15 years have lowered emission rates on a per capita, household and acre basis. However, these accomplishments could not offset the increased cumulative emissions caused by the City's tremendous growth during this time period. Since the baseline inventory, the City has grown by over 82,000 residents and 23,000 homes. To reach its reduction target by 2010, the City is now tasked with decreasing annual community emissions by at least 389,963 tons or 60%." The 2005 Greenhouse Gas Inventory showed a 35% increase in GHG emissions between 1990 and 2005. Though many of the actions recommended by the 2000 CityofChula Vista C02 Reduction Plan were attempted, the effects of these actions were overwhelmed by the pace of growth. MISCELLANEOUS 6. Does the current threshold standard need to be modified? Yes X No If yes, please explain: 1-85 The City's threshold standard provides guidelines for reporting, but fails to set any specific Air Quality threshold standards beyond those set by the State. The City would likely benefit from additional Air Quality thresholds to help evaluate and manage growth. For example, the City could adopt a threshold standard requiring the City to limit increased greenhouse gas emissions. Citywide GHG emissions dramatically increased by 35% between 1990 and 2005, mainly due to residential growth. A more stringent threshold standard would require the City to stop this rate of emissions growth by requiring all new development to be "Zero Energy" or carbon neutral. 7. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. PREPARED BY: Name: Carla Blackmar Name: Brendan Reed Title: Sr. Office Specialist Title: Environmental Resource Manager Date: 03/07/08 Date: 03/07/08 n?::I_Air nll:::ilit\/ n7 1-86 D..........o I; GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 QUESTIONNAIRE (Review Period: 7/1/06 - 6/30/07, to Current Time and Five- Year Forecast) AIR QUALITY - AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT THRESHOLD STANDARD The GMOC shall be provided with an annual report which: 1. Provides an overview and evaluation of local development projects approved during the prior year to determine to what extent they implemented measures designed to foster air quality improvement pursuant to relevant regional and local air quality improvement strategies. 2. Identifies whether the City's development regulations, policies and procedures relate to, and/or are consistent with current applicable Federal, State and regional air quality regulations and programs. 3. Identifies non-development specific activities being undertaken by the City toward compliance with relevant Federal, State and local regulations regarding air quality, and whether the City has achieved compliance. The City shall provide a copy of said report to the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) for review and comment. In addition, the APCD shall report on overall regional and local air quality conditions, the status of regional air quality improvement implementation efforts under the Regional Air Quality Strategy and related Federal and State programs, and the affect of those efforts/programs on the City of Chula Vista and local planning and development activities. 1. Please update the table below: SMOG TRENDS - Number of Days Over Standards fSTAIE $T^NDARDS San Die 0 Region Chula Vista F:EPER)l.I..STDS San Diego Re Chula Vista 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Please provide brief responses to the following: 2. Please note any additional information relevant to regional and local air quality conditions during the period under review. H:\PLANN1NG\GMOC\07 ~08_ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnaires\02b-APC D .07 .doc Page 1 1-87 3. Were there any changes in federal or state programs during the period under review that could affect the City? Yes No x If yes, please explain: FOllOW-UP ON lAST YEAR'S REPORT 4. When was the Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS) last revised? What changes were made/adopted? Please provide a copy of the latest report. The 2004 RAQS is available at http://www.sdapcd.orq/planninq/plan.html. The RAQS is being revised again in 2008. 5. Are there existing or future RAQS programs that Chula Vista needs to be aware of? Yes No X If yes, please explain: MISCELLANEOUS 6. Does the current threshold standard need to be modified? Yes No X If yes, please explain: 7. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. PREPARED BY: Name: Carl Selnick Title: Air Quality Specialist Date: January 29, 2008 H:\PLANNING\GMOC\07 -08 _ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnaires\02b-APCD. 07 .doc Page 2 1-88 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 QUESTIONNAIRE (Review Period: 7/1/06 - 6/30107, to the Current Time and Five Year Forecast) SEWER THRESHOLD STANDARDS 1. Sewage flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards (75% of design capacity). 2. The City shall annually provide the San Diego Metropolitan Sewer Authority with a 12 to 18 month development forecast and request confirmation that the projection is within the City's purchased capacity rights and an evaluation of their ability to accommodate the forecast and continuing growth, or the City Public WorksServices Department staff shall gather the necessary data. The information provided to the GMOC shall include the following: a. Amount of current capacity now used or committed. b. Ability of affected facilities to absorb forecasted growth. c. Evaluation of funding and site availability for projected new facilities. d. Other relevant information. The growth forecast and Authority response letters shall be provided to the GMOC for inclusion in its review. Please update the table below: ~~~!~~~;~ir~~ Average Flow Capacity 16.979 17.062 17.894 19.399 25.87 20.875 20.864 20.864 20.864 20.864 "Build out Projection based on the SANDAG (2040) Please provide brief responses to the following: 1. Have sewage flows or volumes exceeded City Engineering Standards (75% of design capacity) at any time during the period under review? Yes x No If yes, please indicate where, when and why this occurred, and what has been, or will be done, to correct the situation. H:\PLAN N I N G\GMOC\07 -08_ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnaires\03-$eweL07 .rev ..doc Page 1 1-89 Industrial Blvd Sewer Line - The City has a comprehensive Infrastructure Flow Monitoring Program that is driven by data obtained from the 2005 Wastewater Master Plan. Through that effort, Wastewater Engineering staff determined that flows in a section of the Industrial Blvd Sewer line close to the intersection of Industrial Blvd and Main Street was exceeding the established threshold [i.e. pipe was more than 75% full). Therefore, that section of the sewer line may need to be upsized. Staff is in the process of conducting additional monitoring to re-confirm the meter results, and performing hydraulic studies to quantify the potential impact of new development that would be tributary to that line. If the meter results are validated, Staff will propose a capital improvement project to rectify the constraint next fiscal year. GROWTH IMPACTS 2. Are current facilities adequate to accommodate the 12- to 18-month forecasted growth? Yes No _X_ Current sewerage facilities should be able to handle anticipated growth during the 12 to 18 month period, with the exception of the area tributary to the Industrial Blvd Sewer line mentioned above. If no, a) what facilities need to be added? and b) Is there adequate funding for future facilities, including site availability? Response to a.) Industrial Blvd Sewer Line - Upsizing of a section of the pipeline. Response to b.) There are adequate funds in the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund to fund the required improvements. 3. Are current facilities adequate to accommodate the 5-year forecasted growth? Yes No _X_ If no, a) What facilities need to be added? and b) Is there adequate funding for future facilities, including site availability? Response to a.) Industrial Blvd Sewer Line - Upsizing of a section of the pipeline. Response to b.) There are adequate funds in the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund to fund the required improvements. MAINTENANCE 4. Is adequate funding secured and/or identified for maintenance of existing facilities? H:\PLANNI NG\GMOC\07 -08 _ReviewCycle\Rtnd Question naires\03-Sewer. 07. rev..doc Page 2 1-90 Yes x No If no, please explain: 5. Are there any major maintenance/upgrade projects to be undertaken pursuant to the current 1-year and 5-year Capital Improvement Project (CIP) plans? Yes x No If yes, please explain: a. Sewer Rehabilitation Program The City of Chula Vista has a comprehensive Sewer Rehabilitation Program. This is a $1.4 million/year program, which involves the relining or replacement of aging pipelines within the City's wastewater collection system. It also funds the reconstruction of existing pump stations. This program has so far been driven by the information gathered through a comprehensive video monitoring program. City crews using specialized vehicles equipped with video cameras televise and evaluate the conditions of various lines within the collection system. Using data gathered through this process, a priority list of locations that need to be rehabilitated or replaced is developed. Subsequently, these lines are improved as part of the annual Capital Improvement Program (CIP). b. "G" Street Sewer Improvements from Third Avenue to Fourth Avenue- This primarily involves the replacement of portions of "G" Street sewer line between Third Avenue and Fourth Avenue (approximately 2,600 feet of 8, 10 and 12 inch VCP). Project is in the design phase. Construction is scheduled for FY08/09. c. Garrett Avenue Sewer Improvements between Davidson and ESt - This primarily involves the replacement of portions of the sewer line on Garrett Avenue between Third Avenue and Fourth Avenue (approximately 600 feet of 8-inch VCP). Project is in the design phase. Construction is scheduled for FY08/09. d. "e" Street Sewer Improvements From Fourth Avenue to Fifth Avenue - This primarily involves the replacement of portions of the sewer line on "C" Street, From Fourth Avenue to Fifth Avenue (approximately 900 feet - mostly 10 inch VCP). FOllOW-UP ON lAST YEAR'S REPORT 6. Has the capacity valuation study been completed, and are there any implications to the threshold standards? The Draft Capacity Valuation Study has been reviewed by the Metro Participating Agencies. The final draft of the document will be completed within the first quarter of 2008. There are no implications to the threshold standards from the completion of this document. However, it will help provide the pricing framework for the sale/transfer of treatment capacity rights among Metro participating agencies. H:\PLANN1NG\GMOC\07 -08_ ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnaires\03-Sewer. 07 .rev ..doc Page 3 1-91 7. Please provide an update on efforts to increase the City's allocated amount of sewage treatment capacity, in order to meet build-out sewage flow estimates. The City is currently evaluating the following options as possible ways of increasing the City's sewage treatment capacity: a. The construction of an independent treatment facility - The City recently completed a Joint Feasibility Study with Otay Water District and Sweetwater Authority, which explored the feasibility of constructing a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Wastewater Reclamation Plant. The intent was to evaluate the feasibility of a plant that would take a portion of the raw sewage from the sewer system, treat it and generate recycled water that would then be utilized by Otay and Sweetwater in meeting their customers' irrigation needs. The remaining sewage in the system will continue to be treated by the Metro system. By reducing the amount of flow conveyed to the Metro system, the City would not need to acquire additional treatment capacity at that plant. The study determined that it was feasible for the City to build the MBR plant if the City could enter into an agreement with Otay Water District to take the recycled water generated. The study further determined that it was not economically feasible for Sweetwater Authority to participate in the project since they did not have a separate recycled water distribution system like Otay Water District. Staff is now in the process of working with Otay Water District to re-verify their long- term market demand projections. Concurrent with thaI. staff is also engaged in discussions with funding agencies (like the County Water Authority, State Water Resources Control Board etc.) to determine the availability of grants and no-cost/low interest loans that may lower the cost of the facility to make it more economical. b. Purchase of additional treatment capacity rights - Concurrent with the MBR feasibility study, the City has also been exploring the feasibility of acquiring additional capacity through the purchase of treatment capacity rights from other agencies in the Metro system that may have excess capacity in the system. However, most agencies do not have excess capacity that they would be willing to sell at this time. Some have indicated a willingness to do renewable short-term leases as part of a pooled capacity plan that is being discussed among member agencies. Currently, staff is actively engaged in discussions with the City of San Diego for the acquisition of the additional capacity rights. The negotiation has been impacted by the organizational changes in the City of San Diego, specifically, changes at the management/decision-making level of the Metropolitan Wastewater Department. Staff anticipates that in the next six months a decision would be reached on the final acquisition price. At that point the City would be in a position to decide on whether to pay that price or begin the process of building its own treatment plant. MISCELLANEOUS 8. Do the current threshold standards need to be modified? Yes No _X_ H:\PLANNING\GMOC\07 ~08 _ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnaires\03.Sewer.07. rev ,.doc Page 4 1-92 If yes, please explain: 9. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. N/A PREPARED BY: Name: Anthony Chukwudolue Title: Senior Civil Engineer Date: January 31, 2008 H:\PLANNING\GMOC\07 ~08 _ ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionna ires\03-Sewer.07 .rev ..doc Page 5 1-93 THRESHOLD STANDARDS 1. Developer will request and deliver to the City a service availability letter from the Water District for each project 2. The City shall annually provide the San Diego County Water Authority, the Sweetwater Authority, and the Otay Municipal Water District with a 12- to 18-month development forecast and request an evaluation of their ability to accommodate the forecast and continuing growth. The district's replies should address the following: a. Water availability to the City and Planning Area, considering both short and long term perspectives. b. Amount of current capacity, including storage capacity, now used or committed. c. Ability of affected facilities to absorb forecast growth. d. Evaluation of funding and sited district's desire to communicate to the City and GMOC. 1. Please complete the tables below. CURRi:tlT ".' ',' " . .,',. 'f"C". ..., ';""'" Y!;:ARDEMAND (C()n$i.m!P!i.p!:llfY96I07....:. MiIIi9n'9i;\119riS.,.(I\IIG) "CLitfutlt Ye~r ';'...... . Source Current Year - MG - 1t'111(),,~tt . ."OJ.,tifTdtal . '. Proiecfion -- MG '. Local 3876 49 5588 I moorted 3986 51 2395 Total 7862 1 00 7983 Notes: 1) Use of local vs. imported water sources is highly dependent on weather conditions and is, therefore, unpredictable. 2) Table values are for portions of Chula Vista served by Sweetwater Authority only. 1-94 DEMAND and CAPACITY FY 12-18 Month 5 -Year 2006 Projection Proiection Yearly Demand -- (Purchased by 7,934 8,100 8,350 consumers, MG) Yearly Supply Capacity, MG (1,2) -- LOCAL 4,281 4,281 4,281 Yearly Supply Capacity, MG (1,2) -IMPORTED 4,757 4,757 4,757 Yearly Supply Capacity, MG (1,2) - TOTAL 9,058 9,058 9,058 Storage Capacity, MG --Treated 42 42 45 Water Storage Capacity, MG -- Raw 5,676 5,676 5,676 Water Notes: 1) Maximum supply capacity includes 62 cfs (40 mgd) treated water connection, Robert Perdue Treatment Plant (30 mgd), Reynolds DesaI. plant (4mgd) and National City Wells (2 mgd). 2) Normal maximum supply capacity is from Robert Perdue Treatment Plant (30 mgd), Reynolds DesaI. plant (4mgd) and National City Wells (2 mgd). 3) There are 11 emergency interconnections with a current 16.92 MGD capacity or 6,176 MG per year. This supply is not always readily available and can't be used for extended periods and will be counted as imported water. 4) Local supply components are Desai (4 MGD), NC Wells (2MGD), and Perdue Treatment Plant (30 MGD). Imported Supply components are Treated Water Connection (40MDG). There is an imported raw water connection that is not counted since it is limited by the local Perdue Treatment plant. Please provide brief responses to the following questions: GROWTH IMPACTS 2. Has growth during the period under review negatively affected the ability to maintain service levels? Yes No _X_ If yes, please explain. 3. Do current facilities have the ability to accommodate forecasted growth for the 12- to 18-month timeframe? Yes_X_ No If no, please list any additional facilities needed to serve the projected forecast, and 1-95 when and where they would be constructed 4. Do current facilities have the ability to accommodate forecasted growth for the 5-year timeframe? Yes No _X_ If no, please list any additional facilities needed to serve the projected forecast, and when and where they would be constructed. The District has identified necessary facility improvements based on known development within the service area. Timing to complete these improvements is subject to available funding on a year-to-year basis. New development may be required to proceed with these improvements, or completing additional improvements beyond those identified in the Master Plan (e.g., Bayfront Development). 5. Does the District have land to accommodate the proposed facilities, or need assistance from the City? Majority of new water facilities are pipelines that will be located on City of Chula Vista public streets. The District has necessary land to accommodate other new water facilities (e.g., storage tanks). 6. How would future facilities be funded? Rate payers, developer capacity fees and potential government grants 7. Is an appropriate/adequate mechanism(s) in place to provide funding? Yes_X_ No If yes, please explain: Capacity fees are collected from developers, and water rates have a component for maintenance and improvements. 8. Are there any other growth-related issues affecting maintenance of the current level of service as Chula Vista's population increases? Yes No _X_ If yes, please explain: MAINTENANCE 9. Is adequate funding secured and/or identified for maintenance of existing facilities? Yes_X_ No Please explain: Maintenance is directly funded by our rate payers and the District is not dependent on state or federal funding. 10. Are there any new major maintenance/upgrade projects to be undertaken pursuant to the current 1-year and 5-year Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs)? Yes X_ No If yes, please explain: Sweetwater Authority's 2007 Water Facilities Master Plan Update lists all proposed projects and estimated costs. 1-96 FOLLOW-UP ON LAST YEAR'S REPORT 11. Please provide an update on the district's water emergency policy. The Authority currently operates 11 emergency interconnections with a current capacity of 16.92 MGD and is scheduled to install two additional connections for a total capacity of 19.80 MGD. See attached table and figure for details. 12. Please provide status on the feasibility and cost of utilizing recycled water for the City of Chula Vista. At its November 14, 2007 meeting, the Sweetwater Authority Governing Board voted to discontinue any further planning regarding generating and/or delivering recycled water within its service area, as it is not economically justifiable when compared to other sources of supply and water treatment. This decision was based on two studies. The first study was a Recycled Water Master Plan completed inJune 2005. This analyzed customer base, infrastructure, and the costs to deliver recycled water from the City of San Diego's South Bay Water Reclamation plant. The second study completed in October 2007 was ajoint effort between the City of Chula Vista and Otay Water District that looked at costs to generate and deliver recycled water via a membrane bioreactor (MBR) facility. This latter study concluded that the cost to purchase and deliver recycled water from a MBR facility would be approximately five to six times the cost of utilizing existing Authority facilities. The conclusion from both of these studies found that, to avoid the prohibitively high cost of constructing recycled water infrastructure, the Authority should continue to augment local supplies through brackish groundwater reclamation and seawater desalination. Therefore, Sweetwater Authority will not require new development to install independent recycled water facilities (i.e., purple pipes) as part of its water infrastructure needs. MISCELLANEOUS 13. Do the current threshold standards need to be modified? Yes No _X_ If yes, please explain: 14. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. The District is working with the City of Chula Vista on water supply requirements for the Bayfront proposed projects. PREPARED BY: Name: Hector Martinez Title: Engineering Manager Date: 2/4/08 1-97 THRESHOLD STANDARDS: 1. Developer will request and deliver to the City a service availability letter from the Otay Water District or Sweetwater Authority for each project. 2. The City shall annually provide the San Diego County Water Authority, the Sweetwater Authority, and the Otay Water District with a 12- to 18-month development forecast and request an evaluation of their ability to accommodate the forecastand continuing growth. The replies should address the following: a. Water availability to the City and Planning Area, considering both short and long term perspectives. b. Amount of current capacity, including storage capacity, now used or committed. c. Ability of affected facilities to absorb forecast growth. d. Evaluation of funding and site availability for projected new facilities. e. Other relevant information the agencies desire to communicate to the City and GMOC. 1. Please complete the following tables. .... .,..,.', ..' . '.. WATER [)EMAND (Million Gallons (MG)) ,REPORTING YEAR: ci.....i './'..... .":" ..... .' .'. . Hi~t<ir!cal Pii.~, .'. '.. FiscaIYear.200lir~O(l7 .'.c .. , . ",' ,-. . ,'-.'. _.,-,-.,--,,__e,..,,_.. I CuJrent 'c' ",""} FY'O:2J03 FY 03/04 ...,;,..,'....,._'-~.:> F~()5/!!6 Source Current :' 12-Month '." '",',"", FY.!!t/05 I Year' . Year Projection %.of 'Y.. of ~N: ...'}I.p' . % of Total .' '.,.,-, ,", (MG) (MG) Total Total Total . Totar SDCWA 1 1 ,892 83,2% 1 1 ,300 92% 93% 93% 92.8% Helix WD 612 4.3% 600 5% 4% 4% 3.6% City of S.D. 1 ,157 8,1% 1 ,200 0% 0% 0% 0.7% RWCWRF 41 1 2.9% 400 3% 3% 3% 2.9% SBWRP 213 1 .5% 1 ,200 0% 0% 0% 0% Total (MG) 14,285 100% 14,700 100% 100% 100% 100% Page 1 1-98 WATERSUP.~f:.y~MA~!;, iiiiliio:rfG~ltb'tis'E>etPaY(MGDn . . ti~~r-~:-"" -'.,:Z\,->__:;'fc, ~:-:-:~i;m,"t\~,_ __ sy~:-~: . ~Y2aa4la5,FY 20.a5Ja6- i'.,:,:, ',"'" ,-.:;~.:,,'_""'''''-.i; t:M8M~hth .' i?idjeciioh~. >5Ye'a~ P toje.cti~n Total Flow Supply Capacity Potable Storage Capacity Non-Potable Storage Capacity Potable Supply Flow Capacity Non-Potable Supply Flow Capacity 130.6 138.7 144.7 144.7 184.7 190.7 196.1 196.1 218,3 235,8 31,7 31,7 43,7 43.7 47,7 129.5 137,5 137,5 137,5 175.5 1,1 1.2 7.2 7.2 9,2 Please provide brief responses to the fof/owing: GROWTH IMPACTS 2. Has growth during the period under review negatively affected the district's current ability to maintain service levels? Yes No _X_ If yes, please explain: 3. Do current facilities have the ability to serve forecasted growth for the 12- to 18- month timeframe? Yes No _X_ If no, please list any additional facilities needed to serve the projected forecast, and when and where they would be constructed. The following is a list of the Otay WD capital improvement program (CIP) facilities anticipated to be needed to serve projected growth within the City of Chula Vista over the next 12 to 18 month time frame, These GIP projects are in various stages of development from planning through construction completion including some with pending developer reimbursement expenditure release, The GIP project details such as total project budget, project description, justification, funding source, projected expenditures by year, project mapping, etc, are provided within the current Otay WD Fiscal Year 2008 through 2013 GIP documents, The Otay WD six-year GIP documentation can be found, viewed, and downloaded from the Otay WD web site at http://www,otaywaterQov/owd/index,aspx, Page 2 1-99 CIP CIP Proiect Title P roiect No. P2070 PL -16-lnch, 980 Zone, Pacific Bay Homes Road- ProctorValley/Rollina Hills Hydro PS P2121 PL - 16-lnch, 711 Zone, Hunte Parkway - Olympic/EastLake P2133 PL - 16-lnch, 711 Zone, EastLake Parkway - Olympic/Birch P2164 PL - 20-lnch, 980 Zone, EastLake Parkway - Olympic/Birch P2169 PL - 20-lnch, 980 Zone, EastLake Parkway - Birch/Rock Mountain P2295 624-1 Reservoir Disinfection Facility, Inlet/Outlet/Bypass and 613-1 Reservoir Demolition P2325 PL - 10" to 12" Oyersize, 1296 Zone, PB Road - Rollino Hills Hydro PS/PB Boundarv P2397 PL - 12-lnch, 711 Zone, EastLake Parkway - Birch/Rock Mountain P2435 PL - 16-lnch, 711 Zone, Birch Road - La Media/SR-125 R2001 RecRes - 450-1 Reservoir 12 MG R2004 RecPS - 680-1 Pump Station 111,500 GPMj R2031 RecPL - 12-lnch, 944 Zone, EastLake Parkway - Olympic/Birch R2033 RecPL - 12-lnch, 944 Zone, Birch Road - La Media/EastLake R2040 RecPL - 12-lnch, 680 Zone, Hunte Parkway - Olympic/EastLake R2041 RecPL - 8-lnch 944 Zone, EastLake Parkway - Birch/Rock Mountain R2043 RecPL - 8-lnch, 944 Zone, Rock Mountain Road - La Media/SR-125 R2081 RecPL - 20-lnch 944 Zone, Lane Avenue - Proctor Vallev/Pond NO.1 R2083 RecPL - 20-lnch, 680 Zone, Heritaoe Road - Village 2/0lvmDic R2091 RecPS - 944-1 Pump Station UDarade R2092 Dis - 450-1 Reservoir Disinfection Facilitv 4. Do current facilities have the ability to serve forecasted growth for the 5-year time- frame? Yes No _X_ If no, please list any additional facilities needed to serve the projected forecast, and when and where they would be constructed. The following is a list of the Otay WD capital improvement program (CIP) facilities anticipated to be needed to serve projected growth within the City of Chula Vista over the next five year time frame that are not already listed in the above table. These CIP projects are in various stages of development. The CIP project details such as total project budget, project description, justification, funding source, projected expenditures by year, project mapping, etc. are provided within the current Otay WD Fiscal Year 2008 through 2013 CIP documents. The Otay WD six-year CIP documentation can be found, viewed, and downloaded from the Olay WD web site at http://www.otavwater.qov/owd/index.aspx. Page 3 1-100 CIP CIP Proiect Title Project No. P2037 Res - 980-3 Reservoir 15 MG P2107 PL - 12-lnch, 711 Zone, Rock Mountain Road - La Media/SR 125 P2134 PL - 16-lnch, 711 Zone, Birch Road - SR 125/EastLake P2367 PL - 16-lnch, 980 Zone, Olvmoic Parkway.. East Palomar/EastLake P2402 PL - 12-lnch, 624 Zone, La Media Road - Villaae 7/0tav Vallev R2028 RecPL - 8-lnch, 680 Zone, Heritaae Road - Santa Victoria/Otav Vallev R2042 RecPL - 8-1 nch, 944 Zone, Rock Mountain Road - SR-125/EastLake R2047 RecPL - 12-lnch, 680 Zone, La Media Road - Birch/Rock Mountain R2082 RecPL - 24-lnch, 680 Zone, OlvrnnTc Parkwav- Villaae 2/Heritaae R2085 RecPL - 20-lnch, 680 Zone, La Media - State/Olvmoic 5. Are there any other growth-related issues that would affect the district's ability to maintain the current level of service as Chula Vista's population increases? Yes No _X_ If yes, please explain: 6. Is adequate funding secured and/or identified for maintenance of existing facilities? Yes_X_ No If no, please explain: 7. Are there any new major maintenance/upgrade projects to be undertaken pursuant to the current year and 6 year capital improvement program projects that are needed to serve the City of Chula Vista? Yes_X_ No If yes, please explain: The following is a list of the maintenance, replacement, and/or upgrade projects within the FY 2008 Otay WD capital improvement program (CIP) that are planned and anticipated to be needed to serve the City of Chula Vista. The CIP project details such as total project budget, project description, justification, funding source, projected expenditures by year, project mapping, etc. are provided within the current Otay WD Fiscal Year 2008 through 2013 CIP documents. The Otay WD six-year CIP documentation can be found, viewed, and downloaded from the Otay WD web site at http://www.otavwater.qov/owd/index.asDx. Page 4 1-101 CIP CIP Proiect Title Proiect No. P2366 APCD Enqine Replacements and Retrofits P2382 Safety and Security Improvements P2416 SR-125 Utility Relocations P2441 NG/RAMAR Meter Replacements P2456 Air and Vacuum Valve Upgrades P2458 AMR Manual Meter Replacement R2053 RWCWRF - R.O. Building Remodel and Office Furniture R2086 RWCWRF Force Main Air and Vacuum Replacements and Road Improvements RECYCLED WATER 8. Please update/complete the table below. RECYCLED WATER DEMAND PER YEAR (Million Gallons (MG)) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TOTAL 738 905 1,147 1,136 1,419 1,482 USES Irrigation 738 905 1,147 1,136 1,419 1,482 Industrv Recharge 9. Is Otay Water District meeting demands per the table above? Yes, sufficient supplies to meet the entire demand for each of the years within the table have been achieved. 10. How many gallons of recycled water can Otay Water District currently deliver to the City of Chula Vista? The Otay WD has a current supply of recycled water to serve the City of Chula Vista totaling at least 7.2 million gallons per day. The Otay WD has an agreement with the City of San Diego for recycled water supplies from their South Bay Water Reclamation Plant (SBWRP). This October 20, 2003 agreement provides for at least 6 MGD of supply from the SBWRP with the ability to take more if the City of San Diego has capacity to provide additional supply to Otay WD. The supply of recycled water from the SBWRP began on May 18, 2007 with construction completion and operation of the transmission, storage, and pump station systems necessary to receive the SBWRP recycled water. During the majority of fiscal year 2007 potable water was used to supplement the recycled water supply needs. The Otay WD Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling Facility (RWCWRF) can produce 1.2 MGD of recycled water. The recycled water system was planned and constructed to have the capability to deliver and meet of the current and future recycled water demands placed upon the recycled water system. Page 5 1-102 11. What impacts do the items below have on the district's current efforts to market recycled water? a Water quality b. Price of water c. Willing customers d. Distribution lines e. Other In terms of water quality, the total dissolved salt (TDS) content of the recycled water supply, typically ranging between 800 and 950 TDS, is the primary factor potentially impacting the cost of recycled water production to meet regulatory requirements on limitations of salt loading within market areas. Currently, TDS levels are below the regulatory limit of 1,000 TDS and do not impact water quality requirements, nor increase the cost for the production. The landscape planting materials need to be selected such that those that are highly sensitivity to salt levels are not integrated into the landscape- planting scheme. The Otay WD currently markets recycled water at 85% of the potable water rate. This pricing level has increased user willingness and acceptance of the Otay WD mandatory recycled water use ordinance. A significant increase in the wholesale price of recycled water purchased from the City of San Diego as supplied by the SBWRP could impact the total cost of the recycled water program. Customer acceptance of recycled water use overall has been very positive. When resistance is encountered it is typically due to concerns of increased capital cost to install the necessary distribution pipelines to the irrigation areas. The Otay WD through collection of water meter capacity fees funds the recycled water transmission main, storage reservoir, and pump station capital improvement program facilities. 12. What are the exposure thresholds and health standards for recycled water? The California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the California Department of Public Health regulate the use of recycled water. The two principal regulatory documents are the "Comprehensive Water Quality Control Plan Report, San Diego Region (9)" (Basin Plan), and the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Environmental Health, Chapter 3, Water Recycling Criteria (Title 22). The Basin Plan requirements vary by hydrographic subunits. Title 22 requirements are uniformly applied wastewater treatment requirements based on the intended use of the produced recycled water. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (Regional Board) adopted on May 9, 2007 a Master Reclamation Permit for Otay WD under Order No. R9-2007 -0038. This order established compliance requirements for the discharge and purveyance of disinfected tertiary effluent for recycled water use. Recycled water from the SBWRP is regulated by Regional Board Order No. 2000-203 and addenda. The specific thresholds and health standard requirements are stipulated in Regional Board Order No. R9-2007-0038 and Order No. 2000-203. The RWCWRF and SBWRP facilities that supply the Otay WD with tertiary treated recycled water meet Title 22 oxidized, coagulated, filtered, and disinfected effluent requirements as per Regional Board Order No. R9-2007-0038 and Order No. 2000-203. Page 6 1-103 FOLLOW-UP ON LAST YEAR'S REPORT 13. Please provide an update on the district's water emergency policy. The potential for interruptions to the water supply continue to be addressed by Otay WD, San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA), and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) through the development of long-term emergency water supply such as the MWD Diamond Valley Reservoir (six months), the SDCWA Emergency Storage Project (90 days), and the Otay WD ten-day storage, conservation and alternative supply strategy. The MWD, SDCWA, and Otay WD continue to pursue the availability of alternative water supply and supply diversification to be used under normal and in emergency conditions. The Otay WD need for a ten-day water supply during a SDCWA shutdown is actively being implemented and has been fully addressed in the Water Resources Master Plan (WRMP) dated August 2002 and the recently completed Integrated Water Resources Plan (IRP). The Otay WD has the ability to meet and exceed this requirement within the City of Chula Vista service area through storage capacity, conservation efforts, and existing interconnections with other agencies. MWD, SDCWA, and Otay WD all have programs to continue to meet or exceed the emergency water supply needs of the region into the foreseeable future. The Otay WD is actively pursuing development local water supply through the sharing of treatment plant capacity with agencies such as Helix Water District and the City of San Diego. An agreement with the City of San Diego for 10 MGD from their Otay Water Treatment Plant (WTP) was achieved in 1999. This is a 50-year renewable agreement to provide 10 MGD of immediate capacity and an additional required capacity in the future from the Otay WTP. In addition, 8 MGD from the Helix Water District's Levy Water Treatment Plant is currently available to Otay WD. A connection with Helix WD known as Flow Control Facility No. 14 was placed into operation during Fiscal Year 2004. This connection made the increased capacity a reality. At the City of San Diego's Otay WTP site a trailer amounted engine driven temporary pump system project has been installed and is in operation. This capital investment has the ability to pump the treated water produced at the Otay WTP into the Central Area- Otay Mesa Interconnection Pipeline system connected to the Central Area and Otay Mesa Systems. This facility nearly triples the flow capacity capabilities to a maximum of about 20 MGD. The Otay WD and SDCWA entered into an agreement, known as the East County Regional Treated Water Improvement Program (ECRTWIP). When the ECRTWIP facilities are in operation, scheduled for March 2010, the total available alternative supply from the Helix WD Levy WTP will be 12 MGD on-peak and 16 MGD of off-peak capacity. The Otay WD, City of San Diego, and the SDCWA are actively negotiating an agreement with the concept of increasing treating raw water at the Alvarado WTP and pumping the treated water into the existing SDCWA aqueduct system to benefit Otay WD and the region. This would decrease the reliance on the MWD Skinner WTP located in Riverside County and increase local under treatment supplied from any source of untreated water. An historic and very positive water supply event was transacted known as the Quantification Settlement Agreement (QSA) and other related agreements between all interested parties and agencies including SDCWA. With execution of the QSA and Page 7 1-104 related agreements, delivery of 10,000 acre-feet into San Diego County from the transfer continues since 2003. The quantities will increase annually to 200,000 acre-feet by the year 2021 and remain fixed for the duration of the transfer agreement. The initial term of the agreement is for 45 years, with a provision to extend the agreement for an additional 30- year term under certain circumstances. This agreement assures the San Diego County region a reliable water supply. Also, the SDCWA Regional Water Facilities Master Plan addresses water supply needs through 2030 and the required systems for its delivery to Otay WD and their other member agencies. On September 25, 2003, the SDCWA Board voted to accept assignment of the MWD's water rights to 77,700 acre feet per year through lining of the All American Canal and Coachella Canal. These lining projects will stop the loss of water that currently occurs through seepage and that conserved water will go to the SDCWA This will provide the San Diego region with an additional 8.5 million acre-feet of water over the 11 a-year life of the agreement. The SDCWA Board of Directors approved the construction of a water treatment plant within the North County. The capacity of the planned facility is 100 MGD. The SDCWA awarded a design-build-operate contract to implement the project and it is currently under construction and is planned to begin operation in 2008. On April 29, 1998, the SDCWA signed a historic agreement with Imperial Irrigation District (liD) for the long-term transfer of conserved Colorado River water to San Diego County. Under the Water Authority-liD Agreement, Colorado River water is conserved by Imperial Valley farmers, who voluntarily participate in the program, and then transferred to the SDCWA for use in San Diego County. The water to be conserved is part of liD's Colorado River rights, which are among the most senior in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Imperial Valley farmers conserve the water by employing extra-ordinary conservation measures. The Otay WD continues to have a Water Conservation Program to reduce the quantity of water used by customers for the purpose of conserving water supplies. The program encourages irrigation efficiency of all customer accounts. A study suggested that if users could be encouraged to manage their landscape with a maximum annual amount of 48- inches of water, approximately 1,000 acre-feet of water would be saved annually. Conservation is promoted by the education of the public, encouragement of water conservation through a school education, and with water conservation incentive programs. MISCELLANEOUS 14. Do the current threshold standards need to be modified? Yes No_X_ If yes, please explain: 15. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. The Otay Water District (Otay WD) has anticipated growth, effectively managed the addition of new facilities and water supply needs, and does not foresee any negative Page 8 1-105 impacts to current or future service levels. In fact service levels have been enhanced with the addition of new major facilities that provide access to existing storage reservoirs and increase supply capacity from the Helix Water District Levy Water Treatment Plant, the City of San Diego South Bay Water Treatment Plant, and the City of San Diego Otay Water Treatment Plant. This is due to the extensive and excellent planning Otay WD has done over the years including the development of a Water Resources Master Plan and the annual process to have the capital improvement program projects funded and constructed in a timely manner corresponding with development construction activities and water demand growth that require new or upgraded facilities. The process of planning followed by the Otay WD is to use WRMP as a guide and to reevaluate each year the best alternatives for providing a reliable water supply and system facilities. Growth projection data provided from SANDAG, the City of Chula Vista, and the development community was used to develop the WRMP. The WRMP and IRP incorporate the concepts of water storage and supply from neighboring water agencies to meet emergency and alternative water supply needs. The Otay WD works closely with City of Chula Vista staff to insure that the necessary planning information remains current considering changes in development activities and land use planning revisions within Chula Vista such as the Otay Ranch. The Otay WD WRMP defines and describes the new water facilities that are required to accommodate the forecasted growth within the entire Otay WD. These facilities are incorporated into the annual Otay WD CIP for implementation when required to support development activities. As major development plans are formulated and proceeds through the City of Chula Vista approval processes, the Otay WD typically requires the developer to prepare a Sub-Area Master Plan (SAMP) for the specific development project consistent with the WRMP. This SAMP document defines and describes all the water and recycled water system facilities to be constructed to provide an acceptable and adequate level of service to the proposed land uses. The SAMP also defines the financial responsibility of the facilities required for service. The Otay WD through collection of water meter capacity fees funds those facilities identified as CIP projects. These fees were established to fund the CIP project facilities. The developer funds all other required water system facilities to provide water service to their project. The SAMP identifies the major water transmission main and distribution pipeline facilities which are typically located within the roadway alignments. The Otay WD plans, designs, and constructs water system facilities to meet projected ultimate demands to be placed upon the potable and recycled water systems. Also, the Otay WD forecasts needs and plans for water supply requirements to meet projected demands at ultimate build out. The water facilities are constructed when development activities require them for adequate cost effective water service. The Otay WD assures that facilities are in place to receive and deliver the water supply for all existing and future customers. The Otay WD, in concert with the City of Chula Vista, continues to expand the use of recycled water. The Otay WD continues to actively require the development of recycled water facilities and related demand generation within new development projects within the City of Chula Vista. The City of Chula Vista, Sweetwater Authority, and Otay WD recently completed a study of the feasibility to provide the City with projected needed sewer disposal capacity and production of recycled water. In summary, the water supply outlook remains good and the City of Chula Vista's long- term growth should be assured of a reliable water supply. However, water supply Page 9 1-106 agencies throughout California continue to face climatological, environmental, legal, and other challenges that impact water source supply conditions, such as the recent court ruling regarding the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta issues. Challenges such as these essentially always will be present. The regional water supply agencies, the SDCWA and MWD, along with Otay WD nevertheless fully intend to have sufficient, reliable supplies to serve demands. The continued close coordination efforts with the City of Chula Vista and other agencies have brought forth significant enhancements for the effective utilization of the region's water supply to the benefit of all citizens. PREPARED BY: Name: James F. Peasley, P.E. Title: Water Resources Engineering Manager Date: 1/29/2008 Page 10 1-107 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 QUESTIONNAIRE (Review Period: 7/1/06 - 6/30/07 to the Current Time and Five Year Forecast to 2011) LIBRARIES THRESHOLD STANDARD In the area east of 1-805, the City shall construct, by buildout (approximately year 2030) 60,000 GSF of library space beyond the city-wide June 30,2000 GSF total. The construction of said facilities shall be phased such that the City will not fall below the city-wide ratio of 500 GSF per 1,000 population. Library facilities are to be adequately equipped and staffed. 1. Please update the table below: LIBRARIES Total Gross Square Gross Square Feet of Population Footage 9f Library Library Facilities Per 1000 Facilities Population Threshold X X 500 Sq. Ft. FY 1998-99 169,265 102,000 603 FY 1999-00 178,645 102,000 571 FY 2000-01 187,444 102,000 544 FY 2001-02 195,000 102,000 523 FY 2002-03 203,000 102,000 502 FY 2003-04 211,800 102,000 482 FY 2004-05 220,000 102,000 464 FY 2005-06 223,423 102,000 457 FY 2006-07* 227,723 102,000 448 12-Month Projection 229,613 102,000 444 1(12/31/07)' 5-Year Projection 253,600 132,000 520*** I (2012)" "'Planning Division Estimate **5-year projections are based on GMOC Forecast '''Assumes the opening of the Eastern Urban Center facility. Please provide brief responses to the following: 2 The GMOC realizes that construction of the Rancho del Rey library is necessary to bring the City back into compliance with the 500 GSF/1000 population threshold standard. Please provide an update on the City's plan for funding and constructing 1-108 the library. It is not known at this time when sufficient funds will become available for the construction of the Rancho del Rey Branch Library. Preconstruction planning and design have been completed. Eventual construction of the Rancho del Rey Branch library will depend on an upturn in new housing construction in areas subject to the Development Impact Fee program. 3. Are current facilities able to serve forecasted growth for the 12- to 18-month timeframe? Yes X No If no, please explain: Although the city-wide ratio for library space, will not be met, Library staff will strive to ensure that existing facilities are adequately staffed and equipped. More uncertain than facilities will be the impact of future budget reductions, if any. 4. Are current facilities able to serve forecasted growth for the 5-year timeframe? Yes X No If no, please explain: 5. Will new facilities be required to accommodate the forecasted growth? Yes X No In order to accommodate forecasted growth, the 1998 Library Master Plan calls for the construction of a full service regional library of approximately 30,000 square feet in the Rancho del Rey area and the construction of a second full service regional library of approximately equal size in the Eastern Urban Center in Otay Ranch. Public Facilities Development Impact Fees have been and are being collected to pay 100% of the costs of these facilities. If no, please explain: 6. What is the potential for insufficient facilities to negatively affect services addressed by the threshold standard? The Library's goal is to provide "adequately staffed and equipped" branches that respond to current demands and usage of our facilities by the residents. Maintaining that goal is dynamic as we continually survey and measure our community's use of and satisfaction with library services. We reallocate staff and adjust hours to provide effective public service more efficiently. This effort has been assisted by advances in technology overthe past few years. The possibility of offering interim library service is currently being explored in locations east of the 1-805. Funding options will be examined with the Finance Department and the City's CIP coordinator. H :IP LAN N IN GIGMOCI07 -08 _ReviewCyclelRtnd QuestionnairesI05-Libraries. 07. doc Page 2 1-109 7. Please complete the table below: LIBRARY USAGE TRENDS Annual Attendance Annual Circulation Guest Satisfaction FY 06/07 1148024 1344115 88% FY 05/06 1170168 1467799 85% FY04/05 1121119 1414295 91% FY03/04 1076967 1308918 88% FOllOW-UP ON LAST YEAR'S REPORT 8. last year, the GMOC noted the need to update the 1998 library Master Plan to reflect increased library needs generated by projected build-out population from the 2005 General Plan Update. In the library Master Plan, how will increased library needs be addressed, and what is the schedule for updating the Library Master Plan? The 1998 Library Master Plan recommended an updated plan be written in 8-10 years. In addition to that recommendation, the current Library Master Plan should be re-done in light of the 2005 General Plan Update and the changes that have taken place in library funding throughout the state and nation. Library staff hopes to secure a consultant for the update within the next calendar year, depending on budget constraints. The Master Plan update will consider the latest trends for establishing facility and service thresholds. Once an updated baseline is established, the plan would recommend how to most effectively and efficiently achieve the thresholds both in relation to new facilities and in regard to updating existing facilities given projected infill development. MISCEllANEOUS 9. Does the current threshold standard need to be modified? Yes No X (not at this time) If yes, please explain: Given circulation trends, the need to update the Library's Master Plan, and the City's current financial situation, Library administrative staff plans, over the next year, to study other municipalities and regions regarding their library threshold standards for comparative purposes. 10. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. Each year Library division managers chart the course for the year with a set of specific performance goals, as well as measurements and targets directly related to those goals. A sample goal is to: "attain an excellent and responsive materials collection." That goal is measured by identifying a target that needs to be achieved, such as "performing in the upper quartile of a comparison of CVPL's materials budget with libraries nationwide. Having each library division utilizing an identical planning template allows the library H:IPLAN N I NGIGMOCI07 -08 _ReviewCyclelRtnd QuestionnairesI05-Libraries.07.doc Page 3 1-110 department as a whole to stay in sync with its long-term strategic plan and also allows it to make necessary adjustments to its budget and staffing levels under difficult budget circumstances. Progress toward each goal is reported annually in the City's budget process and document. During FY07/08 the Library Department has weathered the loss of 15 full time equivalent staff members and an overall budget reduction of nearly 20%. By following though on its careful planning processes, the library has mitigated the impact of these reductions on the public to the greatest extent possible. The library materials budget was not reduced, but public service hours had to be reduced from 62 hours per week at Civic Center to 54 hours, and from 54 hours per week at South to 48 hours. Eastlake Branch hours remain unchanged at 24 hours of public service per week. PREPARED BY: Name: Roderick Reinhart Title: Assistant Library Director Date: January 4, 2008 H :IPLAN N I NGIGMOCI07 -08 _ReviewCyclelRtnd Q uestionnairesI05-Libraries. 07. doc Page 4 1-111 eTh,c::'''''''''''''r'imW,:.:Ula,;starrbca,y.com . < , ..._'-- . PUBLIC LIBRARY (HULA VISTA MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CC: Growth Management Oversight Commission Leah Browder, Interim Library Director May 21,2008 Clarification of Library's 2008 GMOC Questionnaire Responses Thank you for the frank and direct dialogue during our visit with you on January 24, 2007. I appreciate the opportunity to clarify our responses to Questions 3 ("Are current facilities able to serve forecasted growth for the 12- to 18-month timeframe?") and 4 ("Will new facilities be required to accommodate the forecasted growth?") through this memorandum. As we indicated during the meeting with you, the current timeframe for building the new Rancho del Rey and EUC branch libraries does not allow us to achieve compliance with the 500 GSF/1000 population threshold until, potentially, 2012. This means that we will have been out of compliance with this threshold since approximately Fiscal Year 2002/03. However, the square footage we currently have available (approximately 448 GSF/1000) appears to adequately serve our current population in the sense that we do not have to turn customers away. Our questionnaire responses were intended to communicate that we are struggling with the following constraints: . lack of conveniently located facilities to serve the east side (as we shared during the meeting, the most significant influencing factor on library use is proximity of the facility to the user); . meeting the public's demands for restoration of our hours which were lost during the last round of budget cuts; . adequate computer facilities, both equipment and infrastructure quality at our Civic Branch, and number of stations, as well as speed of connection at all our facilities. In summary, while we are not experiencing any significant issues due to a lack of square footage available (i.e., a failure to meet the threshold), we are experiencing 1-112 significant customer service issues directly related to location of branches, hours and equipment availability and quality. Thank you for your careful consideration of the Library's situation and shared concern regarding the delay in construction of our future facilities. Please feel free to contact me directly at 619-691-5170 if further information is required. 1-113 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 QUESTIONNAIRE (Review Period: 7/1/06 - 6/30/07 to current time and Five Year Forecast) DRAINAGE THRESHOLD STANDARDS: 1. Storm water flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. 2. The GMOC shall annually review the performance of the City's storm drain system to determine its ability to meet the goals and objectives above. Please provide brief responses to the following: 1. Have storm water flows or volumes exceeded City Engineering Standards at any time during the periOd under review? Yes No X If yes: a. b. c. Where did this occur? Why did this occur? What has been, or is being, done to correct the situation? 2. What is being done to implement the NPDES program, and are storm drain fees adequate for the City to implement the program? During the reporting period, the City met all its responsibilities for compliance with the NPDES Municipal Permit requirements. A description of the City's compliance activities during the Fiscal- Year 2006-2007 is included in the City's Jurisdictional Urban Runoff management Program Annual Report No. 27, which was delivered to the County of San Diego (Principal Copermittee) for submittal to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board). Significant activities included: a. Staff reviewed development project submittals for compliance with NPDES regulations, including Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plans (SUSMP) requirements for Site Design, Source Control, and Treatment Control Best Management Practices (BMPs). b. All inspections of construction sites and municipal, commercial, industrial, and residential facilities and activities were conducted in accordance with the frequencies required by the NPDES Municipal Permit. Quarterly night inspections were conducted to evaluate compliance with NPDES requirements by mobile power washing businesses, which normally conduct power-washing activities during night hours. Violators were cited. c. Reported violations of the Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 14.20 (Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance) were responded to in the shortest possible time and follow-up inspections were conducted to ensure satisfactory resolution H/PLAN N ING/GMOC\07 -08_rEVIEWcYCLElquestionnaires\8-DRAINAGE Page 1 1-114 of each case. The City has not received a Notice of Violation under the NPDES Municipal Permit since July 2005, when all Copermittees received Notices of Violation for inadequate watershed management activities; the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board subsequently rescinded these Notices of Violation. d. During Fiscal-Year 2006-2007, the City continued its public education efforts to increase public awareness on the importance of pollution prevention and water quality protection. The City utilized the services of "I Love A Clean San Diego" to develop and implement several community events, such as the Creek to Bay Cleanup Event and the Salt Creek Critters Program. Other educational programs achieved during the Fiscal-Year 2006-2007 include: . Education of developers, contractors, and trades through staff participation in Construction Site Management for Water Quality workshops organized by the Building Industry Association and individual developers working in Chula Vista. . Education of mobile business owners through cooperation with the Planning and Building Department, Business License Section. . Education of residents through development and distribution of brochures, bus signs, door hangers, and participation in community events. The City has established an environmental stakeholder workgroup with the cooperation of several City departments and participation of public agencies, business owners, community groups, and other interested parties. The goal of the workgroup is to develop and implement environmental public education programs. A "CLEAN" web page has been established and can be accessed at: http://www.chulavistaca.qov/CLEAN/.This web page serves as a portal to disseminate information on the City's environmental programs and activities. This web page currently includes some basic information but staff is in the process of expanding the web page and adding information in accordance with an established design. e. During the summer of 2007, the City's consultants conducted dry weather field screening and analytical monitoring at 57 outfalls throughout the City. The most persistent pollutants observed during this year's dry weather monitoring program were bacterial indicators. Sources of bacterial indicators may include animal and bird waste, decomposing organics, sewage spills, human encampments, pet waste, illegal dumping into storm drains, aerial deposition, etc. Through increased public education and storm drain maintenance, the City is addressing the problem. It must be noted that the presence of bacterial indicators does not necessarily correspond to impairment of beneficial uses of receiving waters. f. During the winter of 2006-2007, the City participated in the Regional Wet Weather Monitoring Program. Under this program, samples from storm events are taken in 10 watersheds throughout San Diego County. Analytical test results from samples taken during storm events at a Mass Loading Station located on the Sweetwater River near the Willow Street Bridge is used to evaluate the health of the Sweetwater Watershed. Results of this monitoring confirmed that bacterial indicators were the most persistent pollutants within the Sweetwater sub-watershed. The presence ofthese bacterial indicators does not necessarily correspond to impairment of beneficial uses of receiving waters. g. The NPDES Municipal Permit is due for re-issuance every five years. On January 24, 2007, the Regional Board adopted the new NPDES Municipal Permit, Order No. R9-2007- 0001 (Municipal Permit). The Municipal Permit allows for a 365-day period during which H/PLANNING/GMOC\07 -OB_rEVIEWcYCLElquestionnaires\B-DRAI NAGE Page 2 1-115 Co permittees update their Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Programs, Ordinances, and permit approval procedures to incorporate the new requirements and establish legal authority for the enforcement of such requirements. Subsequent to the wildfires of Southern California, the Co permittees who were affected by the disaster requested the Regional Board for a 50-day extension to this time period. The Regional Board agreed with the Copermittees' request and extended the deadline from January 24, 2008 to March 24, 2008. The Copermittees are expected to update their programs and ordinances, and be in full compliance by the new deadline. h. The Copermittees are required to cooperate at regional and watershed levels for the development and implementation of joint programs and pay their fair share of the costs. On January 24,2002, subsequent to the issuance of the old Municipal Permit, Order No. 2001-01, the Copermittees entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), which outlined rules and regulations for regional and watershed workgroup structures, meetings, voting, and cost sharing, as well as each Copenmittee's responsibilities. The MOU was set to expire on July 24, 2004. On July 17, 2007, the City Council approved an extension of the MOU to December 31, 2007. As a result of the new Municipal Permit, it became necessary for the Copermittees to sign a new Memorandum of Understanding to incorporate the new requirements established by the new Municipal Permit. Therefore, the new MOU was adopted by the City Council on December 11,2007, and will be effective until 12 months after the expiration of the Municipal Permit. This time lapse allows the Co permittees to develop a new MOU consistent with the next Municipal Permit. i. The new Municipal Permit imposes significant additional requirements on the Copermittees, developers, and many commercial/industrial businesses throughout San Diego County. City staff estimates that compliance with the new requirements will require additional funding for new staff, equipment, and programs in the amount of about $6.1 million in General Fund revenues over the permit's five-year life. This is above and beyond the amount of General Funds now being used to cover some of the NPDES program costs. Existing Storm Drain Fee revenues, currently at about $500,000 per year, are not sufficient to cover existing program costs and will, therefore, only be used to fund continuing program requirements currently funded by Storm Drain Revenue Funds. GROWTH IMPACTS 3. How is the City protecting natural drainage channels relative to the forecasted growth? During the permit review process, applicants of high priority development projects are required to submit a Water Quality Technical Report (WQTR). The WQTR includes a study of the development project's impact on the quality and quantity of urban runoff, i.e., Pollutants of Concern and Hydrologic Conditions of Concern. The WQTR is required to demonstrate that adequate Best Management Practices, including on-site and/or off-site, will be implemented to protect downstream receiving waters, including natural drainage channels from impairment, erosion, and habitat impact. 4. Will any new facilities be required to accommodate the 12- to 18-month growth forecast? Yes No X HIP LAN NING/GMOCI07 -08_rEVIEWcYCLElquestionnaires\8-DRAINAGE Page 3 1-116 a. Are there sites available for the needed facilities? b. How will these facilities be funded? c. Is an appropriate/adequate mechanism(s) in place to provide funding? Developers of a proposed subdivision are required by Section 3-201 of the Subdivision Manual to provide on-site detention facilities such that the post- development flow rate for a given design storm does not exceed the pre- development flow rate at the outlet of the subdivision. Although new drainage facilities may be required to serve the development, they will be provided and financed by the developer. There should not be any significant impact on existing downstream facilities. Most of the development in the short-term forecast is in eastern Chula Vista. There is sufficient room to accommodate the drainage improvements needed for these areas, as well as the smaller developments in western Chula Vista. 5. Will any new facilities be required to accommodate the 5-year growth forecast? Yes X No Significant development is projected in the 5-year forecast for the Telegraph Canyon Basin west of 1-805. Priority 1 drainage projects in this basin include the unimproved portion of the channel downstream (southwest) of Sierra Way, associated drainage facilities near the intersection of Third Ave. and L Street, and culverts at Country Club Drive and First Avenue. Development in eastern Chula Vista constructed prior to the detention requirement within the Poggi Canyon Basin (generally including Otay Ranch south of East Palomar Street) may be contributing toward storm drainage in the Woodlawn Park area of western Chula Vista. The downstream facility includes a natural channel that flows into the Otay River. Since the area around this channel is largely undeveloped and the impact of storm drainage is minimal, the constructions of additional drainage improvements in this area are not Priority 1 or Priority 2 projects. Drainage improvements would likely be a condition of in-fill development in this area. a. Are there sites available for the needed facilities? Developers in eastern Chula Vista will be required to provide all necessary facilities and their respective share of maintenance costs to accommodate their impact. Additional facilities or the reconstruction of existing facilities may be needed in order to accommodate new development in western Chula Vista where the parcels are redeveloped at a higher density or where development encroaches onto natural drainage areas. b. How will these facilities be funded? Improvements to the Telegraph Canyon Channel can be partially funded through the Telegraph Canyon Drainage DIF. However, there may not be sufficient funds in the DIF to finance all the improvements needed in this basin. Since the areas adjacent to most new development are generally privately owned, the property owner will fund their proportionate share of these improvements as a condition of development. However, general impacts on developed areas may need to be funded by the City. H/PLP.NNING/GMOC\07 -08_rEV1EWcYCLE\questionnaires\8-DRAINAGE Page 4 1-117 c. Is an appropriate/adequate mechanism(s) in place to provide funding? As previously mentioned, the Telegraph Canyon DIF can be used to finance improvements in the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin. Council adopted the Western Chula Vista Infrastructure Financing Program during Fiscal Year 2003-04, which included $3.0 million for Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) replacementJ rehabilitation, $0.74 million for drainage improvements on Emerson Street and $0.62 for other drainage improvements. The financing will be repaid through the Residential Construction Tax (RCT). However, this will mean that this funding source will not be available for other projects, particularly because the RCT is collected on the building permits, and the rate of issuance of building permits has decreased significantly over the past year. 6. What is the potential for insufficient facilities and/or funds to negatively affect services stipulated by the threshold standards? Insufficient facilities and/or funds may result in an increased potential for flooding, particularly in western Chula Vista, for COllapse of corroded CMP and for erosion, particularly in natural channels and canyons. For the City's NPDES program, it could result in impairment of water quality within receiving waters and create a condition of non-compliance with the Municipal Permit, exposing the City to penalties. MAINTENANCE 7. Is the City cleaning out drainage areas that do not require permits from resource agencies, and is there a plan in place to maintain those areas on a regular basis? The City currently cleans underground drainage systems on an as-needed basis, as determined by field inspection. This includes cleaning of curb inlets and catch basins. The City also cleans locations within natural drainage systems that have been identified to require frequent cleaning. These areas are small-unlined channels from which staff removes invasive plant materials and trash to comply with the newly adopted NPDES permit. Cleaning within natural conveyance systems is conducted by hand tools, as permitted by resource agencies. The City participates in a regional workgroup that has been established to develop channel maintenance procedures that are acceptable to resource agencies and facilitate obtaining environmental permits for channel maintenance from resource agencies. The work product has not been completed at this time. Maintenance in channels that do not require permits are on a routine schedule maintenance plan which can vary depending on the amount of growth of invasive plant materials, trash and debris build up and constituent complaints. 8. Where the City is not able to perform necessary maintenance without being required to obtain permits from various resource agencies, what is the status of hiring a firm to obtain permits? Obtaining permits for channel maintenance is a time consuming and costly process; and in some cases, there may be conflicting requirements from different resource agencies. The City has gone through the sleps of hiring a consultant to help obtain the required permits but due to funding constraints the consultant has not yet been hired. Currently, there is no schedule to get a consultant started. The regional workgroup referenced above has hired a consultant to iron out the difficulties and obtain consensus from resource agencies on a streamlined process understandable by, and acceptable to all parties. H/PLANNINGIGMOCI07 -08_rEVIEWcYCLElqueslionnairesI8-0RAINAGE Page 5 1-118 FOLLOW-UP ON LAST YEAR'S REPORT 9. Please provide an update on the drainage priority list that was approved and adopted on April 4, 2007, Resolution # 2007-081; on the implementation of the adopted Drainage Master Facilities Plan; and other possible funding sources. During the review period, City staff completed a Report on Drainage Deficiencies that established a five-tier rating system for drainage projects. The Infrastructure Workshop on April 5, 2007 focused on Pavement and Drainage needs. The staff report was submitted to Council, with an emphasis on the Priority 1 projects (attached). Council adopted Resolution 2007-081, which approved the Drainage Project Priority List and the Corrugated Metal Pipe Priority Needs List and authorized staff to seek out and apply for any special funding the could help the current estimated unfounded need. Since that date, construction has been completed on Priority 1 C, DR-120: Drainage facilities east of Second Ave. and north of H Street. Construction has also been completed on Priority 1 H, DR-133: Emerson Street drainage facilities. Priority 1 G, including the Telegraph Canyon Channel from Fourth Ave. to Third Ave. and the L Street culvert, is currently in design (DR-167). A CMP rehabilitation contract has recently been awarded. A contract for a study of the Bonita and Long Canyons (Priorities 1 Band 1 E,DR-172) is in process. We anticipate that this study will provide recommendations on the best way to alleviate the potential for erosion in these canyons. The 2004 Drainage Master Plan is basically an informational document that does not provide specific recommendations. It delineates the major drainage basins and subbasins for the entire City and provides ultimate theoretical flows for the 50 and 100-year storms for drainage nodes and storm drains. This document has been used by staff to evaluate the effect of development proposals on our drainage system. 10. Please provide an update on the funding sources, such as grants identified per the drainage facilities priority list (approved by Council in April, 2007, Resolution #2007- 081), for maintenance of existing facilities. City staff has submitted several drainage projects for inclusion in the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan. The Bonita Canyon and Long Canyon Stabilization project has been ranked in Tier 1. Although this increases the chance of receiving State funding, it does not guarantee that this project will be funded. Staff has been tracking funding authorized by 2006 State Propositions 84 and 1 E, but it appears that guidelines have not yet been released. Funding for drainage projects has become more difficult; partially due to the shortage of available funds from the storm drain fee and the residential Construction Tax, two traditional sources of funding for drainage projects. Staff will conduct a second Council Infrastructure Workshop on February 5,2008, which will include a discussion on infrastructure funding. It is anticipated that staff will receive further direction from Council at the workshop. MISCELLANEOUS 11. Do the current threshold standards need to be modified? H/PLANNING/GMOC\07 -OB-,EVIEWcYCLE\questionnaires\B-DRAINAGE Page 6 1-119 Yes If yes, please explain: No x 12. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. PREPARED BY: Name: Elizabeth Chopp Title: Senior Civil Engineer Date: January 29, 2008 H/PLANNING/GMOC\07 -08 rEVIEWcYCLElqueslionnaires\8-DRAINAGE - Page 7 1-120 J:\Engineer\GMOC\DRAINAGE 07 GMOC 021108.fxr.doc HIPLANNING/GMOCI07 -OS_rEVIEVVcYCLElqueslionnairesIS-DRAINAGE Page 8 1-121 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 QUESTIONNAIRE (Review Period: 7/1/06 - 6/30/07 to Current Period and Five Year Forecast) PARKS AND RECREATION THRESHOLD STANDARD Population Ratio: three (3) acres of neighborhood and community parkland with appropriate facilities shall be provided per 1,000 residents east of 1-805. The following table compares City of Chula Vista population estimates from previous years with current and forecasted population estimates. Park acreage provided or anticipated to be provided is also identified. Additionally, the table identifies the park acres to population ratio, (acres of parkland provided per 1,000 persons) for the respective review periods. CITY OWNED PARK ACREAGE Threshold, Forecast, and Comparisons 18-Mth Prior Year Comparisons Threshold Area of City Current Flcast S-Year Standard (6130107) 12.31.08 Flcast June June June 2004 2005 2006 3 Acres per I East 1-805 3.59 3.44 3.21 3.01 2.94 3.58 1,000 AC/1,000 persons Population East West 1-805 of 1-805 AC/1,000 persons 1.15 1.15 1.12 1.03 1.10 1.15 Citywide 2.31 2.26 2.19 1.89 1.94 2.28 AC/1 ,000 persons Acres of East 1-805 389.44 I 389.44 416.04' 278.85 299.38 377.01 Parkland West 1-805 138.76 138.76 138.76 122.33 131.12 137.56 Citywide 528.20 528.20 554.80 401.18 430.50 514.57 Population East 1-805 108,524 113,152 129,442 92,500 101,800 105,373 West 1-805 120,195 120,701 124,158 119,300 119,587 119,999 Citywide 228,719 233,853 253,600 211,800 221,387 225,372 Acre Shortfall East 1-805 63.87 49.98 27.71 1.35 -6.02 60.89 or Excess West 1-805 -221.83 -223.34 -233.71 -235.57 -227.64 -222.44 Citywide -157.96 -173.36 -206.00 -234.22 -233.66 I -161.55 ., Assumes completion of Mount San Miguel Community Park and All Seasons Neighborhood Park. H:\PLANNING\GMOC\07-08_ReYiewCycle\Rtnd Questionnqi~02-2arks and Recreation.07.doc P::108 ~ GENERAL PLANNING ESTIMATES Chula Vista Population -- East versus West ArealY ear 2000 2007 2012 East of 1-805 64,827 109,286 129,442 West of 1-805 118,473 120,327 124,158 Total 183,300 229,613 253,600 Please provide brief responses to the following: 1. Pursuant to the Parks Development Ordinance (PDO) and Parks and Recreation threshold, did the eastern Chula Vista parks system have the required parkland acreage (3 acresl1,OOO persons) during the period under review? Yes --2L- No If no, what actions are being taken, or need to be taken, to correct any parkland shortages? 2. Please provide a list of parks being planned in western Chula Vista within the next five years. The General Plan designated future community park within the vicinity of the KOA campground property has been the subject of preliminary discussions in the context of a Planning and Building Department development application pertaining to the KOA property. Preliminary conceptual deSigns related to future programming of facilities at the park site, have been prepared. The preliminary concepts represent the earliest possible planning efforts for this future park. Depending on the progression of the development proposal being processed through the Planning and Building Department the park site may be subject to the development of a park site master plan within the next five years. GROWTH IMPACTS 3. Are there adequate parks and facilities to accommodate citywide growth forecasted for the next 12- to 18- months? Yes No X If not: a. How many acres of parks and facilities are needed? 15.4 acres are needed to meet the forecast net increase citywide population of 5, 134 persons. b. Are there sites available for the needed parks and facilities? H:\PLANN1NG\GMOC\07-08_ReviewCycle\Rtnd Question~~~~9"~~kS and Recrealion.07.doc Two sites are available (Mt. San Miguel community park and All Seasons neighborhood park). c. Is funding available for the needed parks and facilities? Funding is available for park construction. 4. Are there adequate parks and facilities to accommodate citywide growth forecasted for the next five years? Yes No X If not: a. How many acres of parks and facilities are needed? 74.6 acres are needed to meet the forecast net increase citywide population of 24,881 persons (between 6/30/07 to 12/31/12). b. Are there sites available for the needed parks and facilities? In addition to the two sites identified above, two neighborhood park sites are available in Village 2 and a portion of the Otay Ranch community park site is available. As identified in response to question number 2, an additional site in western Chula Vista may also be available. c. Is funding available for the needed parks and facilities? A portion of the construction funding is currently available. Additional funds will become available as additional parkland and development fees are collected. 5. Are there other growth-related issues you see affecting the ability to maintain the threshold standard as Chula Vista's population increases? Yes No X If yes, please explain: MAINTENANCE 6. Is adequate funding secured andlor identified for maintenance of existing parklands and facilities? Yes No X If no, please explain: General fund budget constrains have resulted in maintenance staff reductions and a corresponding reduction in level of service. 7. Is there adequate staff for park maintenance? Yes No x If no, please explain: General fund budget constrains have resulted in maintenance staff reductions and a corresponding reduction in level of service. 8. Were any major parkland or facilities maintenancelupgrade projects completed during the period under review? H:\PLANN1NG\GMOC\07 -08_ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnairef5~"f2~s and Recreation.Q7.doc Page 3 Yes X No If yes, please list: Otay Park (complete renovation of park) Veterans Park (complete renovation of soccer field) FOLLOW-UP ON LAST YEAR'S REPORT 9. What is the status of the Parks & Recreation Master Plan? A screen draft of the update to The Parks and Recreation Master Plan has been completed and is currently being reviewed by City departments prior to release of a public draft document. MISCELLANEOUS 10. Does the current threshold standard need to be modified? Yes No X If yes, please explain: 11. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC andlor the City Council. No further comments at this time. PREPARED BY: Name: Joe Gamble Title: Landscape Planner II Date: January 15, 2008 Contributing Editor: Robert Beamon, Public Works Administrative Services Manager H:\PLANN1NG\GMOC\07-08_ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnai.fte~OY2'5kS and Recreation.07.doc Pa~e 4 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 QUESTIONNAIRE (Review Period: 7/1/06 - 6/30/07 through the Current time and Five Year Forecast) POLICE THRESHOLD STANDARD: Emergency Response: Properly equipped and staffed police units shall respond to 81 % of the Priority I emergency calls throughout the City within seven (7) minutes and shall maintain an average response time to all Priority I calls of five minutes and thirty seconds (5.5 minutes) or less (measured annually). Urgent Response: Properly equipped and staffed police units shall respond to 57% of the Priority II urgent calls throughout the City within seven (7) minutes and shall maintain an average response time to all Priority II calls of seven minutes and thirty seconds (7.5 minutes) or less (measured annually). 1. Please update the Priority I table below: PRIORITY I CFS - Emer lenev ResDonse, Calls For Service , Call Volume ' ,;'"'' " .Average %ofCaIlResp~nsewJin ',,' , ,', \1Minl.lt~s ..', " ~esP()nse Time Threshold , , St.ll'Yo' " ' 5:30 FY 2006-07 976 of 74,277 84.5% 4:59 FY 2005-06 1,068 of 73,075 82.3% 4:51 FY 2004-05 1,289of74,106 80.0% 5:11 FY 2003-04 1,322 of 71,000 82.1% 4:52 FY 2002-03 1,424 of71 ,268 80.8% 4:55 FY 2001-02' 1,539 of 71,859 80.0% 5:07 FY 2000-01 1,734 of 73,977 79.7% 5:13 FY 1999-00 1,750 of 76,738 75.9% 5:21 CY 19992 1,890 of 74,405 70.9% 5:50 FY 1997-98 1,512of69,196 74.8% 5:47 FY 1996-97 1,968 of 69,904 83.8% 4:52 FY 1995-96 1,915 of 71,197 83.0% 4:46 1 All figures after F'( 2000-2001 (as well as Priority 11 figures on the next page) reflect a change in citizen-initiated call reporting criteria. Prior to FY 01-02, citizen-initiated calls were determined according to call type; they are now determined according to received source. Using the old method of reporting calls for service to better compare change over time, total citizen-initialed calls actually increased 1.5% from FYOQ-01 to FY01-02. 2 The FY98~99 GMOC report used calendar 1999 data due to the implementation of the new CAD system in mid-1998. Page 1 1-126 Please provide brief responses to the following: 2. During the period under review, were 81% of Priority I emergency calls citywide responded to within the threshold standard of seven minutes (maintaining an average of 5.5 minutes)? Yes X No If no, please explain and describe what is necessary to meet the threshold standard for Priority I emergency calls citywide. 3. Please update the Priority II table below: I , " " Threshold FY 2006-07 FY 2005-06 FY 2004-05 FY 2003-04 FY 2002-03 FY 2001-02 FY 2000-01 FY 1999-00 CY 1999 FY 1997-98 FY 1996-97 FY 1995-96 . , ", ,PRIOIUTY II CFS ~ UtgElntRlliSponlOe, CaUsf6r Service <'.' ' " ,-,,' '>", "", , ,,' " " "":" ' "" Call Volume . '% of Call ResponsewlinAvEmige-Response , ""', ,-'7Minutes '", ',Time* 57.0% 7:30 43.3% 11:18 40.0% 12:33 40.5% 11 :40 48.4% 9:50 50.2% 9:24 45.6% 10:04 47.9% 9:38 46.4% 9:37 45.8% 9:35 52.9% 8:13 62.2% 6:50 64.5% 6:38 24,407 of 74,277 24,876 of 73,075 24,923 of 74,106 24,741 of 71,000 22,871 of 71,268 22,199 of 71,859 25,234 of 73,977 23,898 of 76,738 20,405 of 74,405 22,342 of 69,196 22,140 of 69,904 21,743 of 71,197 . These figures do not include responses to false alarms beginning in FY 2002-03, Please provide brief responses to the following: 4. During the period under review, were 57% of the Priority II urgent response calls citywide responded to within seven minutes (maintaining an average of7.5 minutes)? Yes No X If no, please explain and describe what is necessary to meet the threshold standard for Priority II urgent response calls citywide. Additional sworn officers would be necessary to meet the threshold standard for Priority II urgent response calls citywide, Based on a review of patrol staffing levels and response times during 35 swing shifts in February and March of 2007, when staffing was heaviest (18 to 20 officers), response times averaged 11,3 minutes; when staffing was lightest (12 to 13 officers), response times averaged 15.4 minutes, Page 2 1-127 5. During the period under review, please indicate on the table below the number and percentage of Priority I calls that had a 10-minute or greater response time: Priority I Calls Exceeding a 10-Minute Response Time Bv Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Priority I Calls' Calls Over 10 Minutes Percentane 06-07 814 37 4.5 05-06 850 50 5.9 04-05 1,023 65 6.4 03-04 1,106 63 5.7 02-03 1,216 62 5.1 During the period under review, were there any negative results due to the longer response times indicated on the table above? Based on a review of the 37 Priority I call for service narratives/accompanying case reports, there were no negative results due to the longer response times in 31 of the calls. In 6 of the calls it is impossible to determine whether there were negative results. However, we have no evidence that responding any faster to these calls would have changed the outcome of the calls. 6. Was the Police Department properly eauipped to deliver services at the level necessary to maintain Priority I and II threshold standard compliance during the period under review? Yes x No If no, please explain: 7. Was the Police Department properly staffed to deliver services at the level necessary to maintain Priority I and II threshold standard compliance during the period under review? Yes No x If no, please explain: The Police Department is currently not staffed at levels recommended by the staffing model last run in 2005. This staffing model recommended a total of 10 new officers (three to meet current CFS requirements and seven to staff a new beat in the eastern territory). To meet the Priority II response time threshold, staffing would need to be significantly increased. The Chula Vista Police Department is the lowest staffed agency in San Diego County (see chart on next page), with just 1.07 officers authorized per 1,000 residents. 3 This column includes only those calls that had arrive times or were not canceled prior to officer arrival (in these cases, no response time can be calculated), and those calls with original priorities of I. pa9f2128 Chula Vista Police Department: Sworn Officers Per 1,000 Population 2 1.92 1 . Chula Vista . Carlsbad ill Oceanside CJ Escondido . La Mesa CJ EI Cajon . National City . San Diego . Coronado 1,5 0,5 o February 2008 Source: Municipal Agencies; SANDAG 8, If the answers to questions 6 andlor 7, above, were yes, and the threshold standard was not met, please explain the reason(s) for not meeting it. Although the Police Department was properly equipped to meet the response time thresholds, it was not properly staffed to meet the response time thresholds. 9, How would you expect staffing reductions to affect response times in the future? The loss of four Community Service Officer (CSO) positions has the potential to adversely impact response times in future reporting periods. In 2007, CSOs handled approximately 9,000 calls for service and wrote 4,800 crime reports. These reports will now be dispatched to patrol officers, which will undoubtedly have an adverse impact on response times. The 10 sworn positions that were eliminated in response to recent budget cuts may not significantly affect FY 07-08 response times, since the reductions did not take place until the second half of that reporting period, and the first half of FY 07-08 showed an improvement over FY 06-07. Additionally, we have made every effort to keep the number of sworn officers in the Patrol Division as high as possible. We eliminated primarily swom officer positions that were not assigned to the Patrol Division. As a result, long-term and follow-up investigations will be most impacted by the personnel cuts. Although the City's population has increased 65% since 1991, the number of investigators has remained at 1991 levels. GROWTH IMPACTS 10, Has growth during the last year negatively affected the Department's ability to maintain service levels consistent with the threshold standard? Yes x No If yes, please explain and describe what factors contributed to not meeting the pa,e~1 29 threshold standard, and provide your observations and recommendations regarding the current standard to help prevent future shortfalls. Any growth associated with chronic understaffing will inhibit the Department's ability to meet thresholds. As noted earlier, our current staffing levels are below those recommended in a 3- year-old staffing study. 11. Are current facilities, equipment and staff able to accommodate citywide growth forecasted, and meet the threshold standard, for the next 12 to 18 months? Yes No x If no, please explain: Current facilities and equipment are able to accommodate growth over the next 18 months, but staffing is not. (Altogether, the Department recently cut 27 staff positions (10 sworn and 17 civilian). 12. Are current facilities, equipment and staff able to accommodate citywide growth forecasted, and meet the threshold standard, for the next five years? Yes No x If no, please explain: Current facilities and equipment are able to accommodate growth over the next five years, but staffing is not. Recent cuts to the Vehicle Replacement fund may have a negative impact on the readiness of patrol vehicles for service. As patrol vehicles reach higher mileage, there may be increased down time due to service needs. Additionally, staffing cuts in Public Works to the mechanics will mean longer out-of-service times for vehicles awaiting repairs. 13. Are there any other growth-related issues affecting the provision of police services? Yes x No If yes, please explain: Additional variables that could affect the Police Department's ability to accommodate growth during the next five years include the two major bay front projects that may be built (football stadium and convention center). Both projects will require specialized police service due to the nature of their business. 14. Please assess the City's advance hire program relative to keeping pace with growth as presented in the 5-Year Forecast. The advance hire program is designed to reduce the lag time between hiring officers and deploying them on the street; as such it does not directly address growth-related issues. FALSE ALARMS 15. Please provide the status of addressing false alarms and their effect on response times. pa,...: 1 3 0 In July of 2007, the City Council approved false alarm fee and penalty increases to help offset the rising costs of responding to false alarms and to provide additional incentives to residents to reduce false alarm levels. In addition, special efforts made by School Resource Officers to reduce false alarms in elementary, middle and high schools paid off in FY 06-07. False alarms to these districts were reduced 23% to 25% due to the implementation of a "verified" response policy in the Chula Vista Elementary School District, and an education campaign that focused on Sweetwater Union High School District schools. However, because false alanms continue to constitute about one-third of the Priority II CFS workload, these calls negatively impact the Department's ability to meet Priority II response time thresholds. 16. Please update the tables below: . . .... '. NUMBER OF"FAILSE. ALARMS FY 2000-01 FY 2001-0T FY 2002'03 I. FY2003-04 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 . 7,027 8,013 8,262 8,312 8,077 8,257 CALENDAR YEAR TOTALS FOR FALSE ALARMS Per System Per Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 (annualized) (annualized) (annualized) Commercial 1.37 1.09 1.36 1.61 1.02 Residential 0.37 0.28 0.50 0.30 0.23 Total (Com & Res) 0.64 0.49 0.79 0.59 0.43 MAINTENANCE 17. Is adequate funding secured and/or identified for maintenance of existing facilities and equipment? Yes No X If no, please explain: There is no funding for preventative maintenance or building repairs in our current budget. 18. Are there any major maintenance/upgrade projects to be undertaken pursuant to the current 1-year and 5-year Capital Improvement Projects (CIP)? 4 These figures reflect a change in reporting of alarm calls to include those that are dispatched, but canceled en route. Using the old method of reporting alarm calls to better compare change over time, the total number of false alarms actually responded to decreased 5% from FYOO-01 to FY01-02. Page 6 1-131 Yes No X If yes, please explain: FOLLOW-UP ON LAST YEAR'S REPORT 19. What is the status of preparing and implementing an action plan that would address the decline in performance relative to meeting the City's threshold standard? Given the current budget situation, we do not anticipate the necessary resources being available to meet the threshold standard for Priority II CFS. However, in the past year, the Police Department sought suggestions on reducing Priority II response times from sergeants involved in a promotional process. All suggestions were reviewed and discussed by lieutenants and the patrol captain. Officers were also surveyed to determine their awareness of response time thresholds, and training on the thresholds is pending. Finally, for several weeks in the spring of 2007, alarm calls were handled as Priority III CFS to see if that prioritization level would reduce Priority II response times. Reducing the priority level of alarm calls did not significantly change response times because the overall patrol workload level was unchanged. MISCELLANEOUS 20. Does the current threshold standard need to be modified? Yes No If yes, please explain: The Department does not have a position on whether the threshold standard should be modified. However, we think response times should be viewed with some caution. National research' on response times has shown the following: o Victims of robbery, rape, assault and other "victim-involvement" crimes waited an average of 41 minutes before calling police o If victims wait 9 minutes or more before calling police, the likelihood of arrest is not related to police travel time o Reducing response times is unlikely to reduce crime levels o Community satisfaction with police response times is very dependent on incident- specific expectations. That is, if a dispatcher indicates a patrol car will arrive quickly and it doesn't arrive as fast as the caller expected, it's more likely the caller will be dissatisfied. If a dispatcher's response time prediction is accurate - even if they indicate the response will be delayed - it's more likely the caller will be satisfied. 21. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. 5 Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising: A Report to the United States Congress, prepared for the National Institute of Justice by Lawrence W. Sherman, Denise Gottfredson, Doris MacKenzie, John Eck, Peter Reuter, and Shawn Bushway in collaboration with members of the Graduate Program, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Maryland,1997. Page 7 1-132 In FY 07-08, the Police Department budget was cut by $2.9 million. This reduction will have an impact on police services. The Department is currently seeking ways of mitigating the impact of the budget cuts. PREPARED BY: Name: Title: Date: Karin Schmerler Senior Public Safety Analyst 2/20/08 Page 8 1-133 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 QUESTIONNAIRE (Review Period: 7/1/06. 6/30/07 to the Current Time and Five- Year Forecast) FIRE J EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES THRESHOLD STANDARD: Emergency response: Properly equipped and staffed fire and medical units shall respond to calls throughout the City within seven (7) minutes in 80% (current service to be verified) of the cases (measured annually). Please complete the following tables: FIRElEMS - Emergency Response Times % of All Call Review Period Call Volume Response w/in 7:00 Minutes THRESHOLD 80% FY 2007 10,020 88.1% CY 2006 10,390 85.2% CY 2005 9907 81.6% FY 2003-04 8420 72.9% FY 2002-03 8088 75.5% FY 2001-02 7626 69.7% FY 2000-01 7128 80.8% FY 1999-00 6654 79.7% COMPARISON Actual Response Time Average Travel Time for 80% of Calls, 6:24 3:30 6:43 3:36 7:05 3:31 7:38 3:32 7:35 3:43 7:53 3:39 7:02 3:18 3:29 Note: Reporting period for FY 2001-02 and 2002-03 is for October 1, 2002 to September 30, 2003. The difference in 2004 performance when compared to 2003 is within the 2.5% range of expected yearly variation and not statistically significant. Please provide brief responses to the following: 1. During the period under review, were 80% of calls responded to within the threshold standard of seven minutes? Yes X No If not, what is required to meet the threshold standard? 2. During the period under review, did the Fire Department have sufficient properly equipped fire and medical units to maintain threshold standard service levels? Yes X If not, please explain: No 3. During the period under review, did the Fire Department have adequate staffing citywide for fire and medical units to maintain threshold standard service levels? H :\PLANN I NG\GMOC\07 -08_ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnaires\09-Fire. 07 .doc Page 1 1-134 Yes x No If not, please explain: 4. What are the service area sizes (in approximate square miles) of Chula Vista's fire stations, and what is the City's average size? The average size in square miles of the City's Fire Stations' service areas is summarized in the table below: Service Area Station Sq. Miles Station 1 5.91 Station 2 3.33 Station 3 5.73 Station 4 5.97 Station 5 5.02 Station 6 5.20 Station 7 9.33 Station 8 6.54 Station 9 2.93 IAverage 15.55 sq. miles I MAINTENANCE 5. Is adequate funding secured and/or identified citywide for maintenance of existing facilities and equipment? Yes x No If not, please explain: Facilities and equipment needs are adequate for the near term. However, the Fire Department will be recommending adoption of the replacement schedules for major equipment and facilities as outlined in the department's Fire Facility Master Plan. The Department will be bringing forward this plan for adoption within the current fiscal year. Adoption ofthese recommendations will help ensure future service delivery and response times. 6. Are there any major maintenance/upgrade projects to be undertaken pursuant to the current 1-year and 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)? Yes No _X_ If yes, please describe: There are no major maintenance/upgrade projects being undertaken pursuant to the current 1-year and 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). However, the department will be presenting its completed Fire Facility Master plan that will address departmental facility needs as the City moves towards build- out. GROWTH IMPACTS 7. Are current facilities, equipment and staff able to accommodate forecasted growth H:\PLANNtNG\GMOC\07-08_ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnaires\09-Fire.07.doc Page 2 1-135 for the next 12 to 18 months? Yes x No If not, please explain: The Fire Department will be presenting its completed Advanced Life Support (ALS) Study. The implementation of an ALS program will require the addition of new equipment and other resources in order to provide emergency medical services to the community. The Fire Department has already presented a preliminary summary of this program to the public safety committee and will be presenting a full workshop to the Council on ALS services in March 2008. The department will move forward with the implementation of the ALS program with Council approval. Other future facility and equipment needs are addressed in the department's Fire Facility Master Plan that will be presented during this fiscal year. 8. Are current facilities, equipment and staff able to accommodate forecasted growth for the next five years? Yes No _X_ If not, please explain: Current facilities staffing and equipment may not be sufficient to accommodate forecasted growth for the next five years if major projects such as the Bayfront Master Plan, Urban Core Specific Plan and the University move forward. Providing services to the community may require more Fire resources if these projects progress as planned. The impact of this development is addressed in the Fire Facility Master Plan. The plan will be presented to the City Council during current fiscal year for formal adoption. 9. What facilities are being planned within the next five years? The Fire Department will be using the Fire Facility Master Plan to lead planning efforts with respect to adding facilities that are necessary to meet the impacts of growth and planned development. The Fire Facility Master Plan is complete and will be presented to the City Council in a workshop during this fiscal year. FOLLOW.UP ON LAST YEAR'S REPORT 10. Please provide the status of completion of the Fire Facilities Master Plan and Advance Life Support (ALS) Program. Both of these studies have been completed. The Fire Department will be presenting the ALS Study in a council workshop setting in March or April of 2008 and will be requesting Council authority to implement an ALS program. The Public Safety Committee has already been briefed on the ALS program and has been made aware that a recommendation is forthcoming. The Fire Facility Master Plan will presented either in conjunction with the ALS study or shortly thereafter. MISCELLANEOUS H:\PLAN N I NG\GMOC\Q7 -08_ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnaires\09-Fire. 07 .doc Page 3 1-136 11. Does the current threshold standard need to be modified? Yes No _X_ If yes, please explain: The current threshold does not need to be modified as it provides a key measure of response time. However, the fire department believes that additional measures that provide greater insight into the effectiveness of service delivery should be added for a more comprehensive view of fire services and assessment of future resource needs. One such measure that should perhaps also be included as part of the GMOC review, is the response time for assembling an Effective Firefighting Force (EFF) on scene of first alarm fire incidents. Assembly of an EFF for first alarm fire incidents is necessary before fire crews can begin attacking fires. The necessity for such a requirement is for firefighter safety reasons. However, longer response times for assembly of an EFF will likely affect the outcomes of fire incidents in terms of increased losses. The Fire Department is interested in discuSSing the inclusion of this measure at the request of the GMOC. 12. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. The Fire Department is working towards bringing forward the Fire Facility Master Plan Study and the Advanced Life Support (ALS) Study for Council approval. The Fire Department would appreciate the GMOC's support of the recommendations that will be presented to Council with respect to these two studies. Council adoption of these recommendations will have far-reaching impact to future fire service and emergency medical response service delivery to the City. PREPARED BY: Name: Pablo Quilantan Title: Administrative Services Manager Date: 2/1/08 H:\PLANNING\GMOC\07 -08_ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnaires\09-Fire. 07 .doc Page 4 1-137 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 2008 QUESTIONNAIRE (Review.Period: 7/1/06-6130/07 to the Current Time and Five- Year For~ast) TRAFFIC THRESHOLD STANDARDS 1. Citywide: Maintain LOS "c" or better as measured by observed average travel speed on all signalized arterial segments, except that during peak hours LOS "0" can occur for no more than two hours of the day. 2. West of Interstate 805: Those signalized arterial segments that do not meet the standard above may continue to operate at their current 1991 LOS, but shall not worsen. With appropriate maps and tabies, please provide brief responses to the following: 1. For the review period, has the City maintained LOS "c" or better on all signalized arterial segments? Yes No _X_ If no, please list and describe. The following five arterial segments are operating at less than LOS C: SEGMENT DIR. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Heritage Rd. (Telegraph Canyon Rd. - Olympic Pkwy) NB o (3 Hrs), E (3 Hrs) SB 0(1 Hr)' La Media Rd. (Telegraph Canyon Rd. - Olympic Pkwy) NB 0(3 Hrs) SB Oi1 Hr)' Olympic Pkwy (Oleander Ave. - Heritage Rd.) WB 0(1 Hr) Otay Lakes Rd. (E. H 51. . Tel. Canyon Rd.) NB 0(4 Hrs) SB o (3 Hrs), E 11 Hr) Palomar 51. (Industrial Blvd. - Broadway) EB 0(2 Hrs) WB 011 Hr) 2. Were there arterial segments operating at LOS "0" for more than two hours during peak hours? Yes _X_ No If yes, please list and describe. Three of the five segments noted in question 1 are operating at LOS D for more than two hours a day or are operating at less than LOS D. These segments are as follows: H:\PLANNING\GMOC\07 -08_ReviewCycle\Rtnd Questionnair~si1 3.13::11fic.07 .doc SEGMENT DIR. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Heritage Rd. (Telegraph Canyon Rd. - Olympic Pkwy) NB D (3 Hrs). E (3 Hrs) La Media Rd. (Telegraph Canyon Rd. - Olympic Pkwy) NB i D (3 Hrs) Otay Lakes Rd. (E. H 51 - Telegraph Canyon Rd.) NB D (4 Hrs) SB D (3 Hrs), E (1 Hr) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 3. Were any major streets or other traffic improvements constructed during the review period? Yes X No If yes, please list and describe. According to records kept by the Public Works Inspection Section, numerous roadways were opened for public use during the subject reporting period with several previously opened roadways being officially accepted by the City of Chula Vista. The majority of the streets opened or accepted were residential and small collector streets. Only three "major" streets were constructed and opened to the public during the reporting period. A summary of these findings is seen in the following table: Number of Residential! Minor Collector Streets 4 These 4 streets total approx. 9,730 Opened for Public Use: linear feet (1.8 miles) of roadway Number of Residential! Minor Collector Streets 22 These 22 streets total approx. 24,300 Acceoted bv the City of Chula Vista: linear feet (4.6 miles) of roadway Major Streets Opened for Public Use: - Rock Mountain Road 1,350 linear feet (0.25 miles) Birch Road from La Media Rd to Magdelena Ave - 1.200 linear feet (0.23 miles) - - Bob Pletcher Way 650 linear feet (0.12 miles) Major Streets Accepted by the City of Chula Vista 0 - GROWTH IMPACTS 4. Are current facilities able to accommodate forecasted growth (without exceeding the LOS threshold) for the 12- to 18-month timeframe? Yes No X If not, please list new roadways andlor improvements necessary to accommodate forecasted growth for the 12- to 18-month timeframe, and explain: The roadways that will not meet the 12 to 18 month forecast without exceeding the LOS threshold will be: . Heritage Road (northbound) from Olympic Pkwy to Telegraph Canyon Road. . La Media Road from Olympic Parkway to Telegraph Canyon Road. . Otay Lakes Road from East H Street to Telegraph Canyon Rd./La Media Rd. . Palomar Street (eastbound) from Industrial Boulevard to Broadway. a, How these facilities will be funded; and 1-139 P<:lt'1'" ? b. If there is an appropriate/adequate mechanism(s) in place to provide this funding. The funding will be through a combination of the following local funds: TDIF, Traffic Signal DIF and TransNet funds. State and Federal funds will also be used, as they are made available through grant programs. The City is also establishing a new transportation development impact fee for the areas west of Interstate-80S. The Western Transportation Development Impact Fee (WTDIF) should be established by the end of the first quarter of 2008 and if approved, funds would start to be co[lected by the second quarter of 2008. In addition, to the services provided by City staff, the City does have an existing Capital Improvement Program that has funding for consultant services to help improve traffic signal coordination since theses roadways listed above do not meet the threshold standards, primarily due to one signalized intersection. It is anticipated that revised traffic signal plans and/or signal coordination project(s) will be provided at the intersection of: Broadway/Palomar Street Although outside of this reporting period, for the traffic impacts due to the opening of State Route 125 (SR-125), staff is currently preparing a report on the impacts of the SR- 125 Toll Road on those major eastlwest roadways in eastern Chula Vista. The toll road opened to the public, as a freeway (no tolls being collected initially) on Monday November 19, 2007, during Thanksgiving week. The post opening "to[1 road" data collection began in January for almost all users and will be completed in early 2008. The findings will be presented in next year's GMOC report. Initial indications from South Bay Expressway, the operator of the toll road facility, indicates that as of early January 2008, the average weekday two-way traffic count is approximately 35,000 vehicles per weekday and approximately 30,000 vehicles per day on the weekends. Three out of the four corridors that do not meet the threshold standards are located in eastern Chula Vista in proximity to SR-125. Last year, the GMOC recommended no action at the intersection of Heritage Road/Paseo Ranchero/Telegraph Canyon Road until after SR-125 was opened to the public. The same situation occurs with the intersections of East H Street/Otay Lakes Road and at La Media Road/Otay Lakes Road/Telegraph Canyon Road. Once the "post SR-125" traffic study is completed, staff will come back with recommendations for all three corridors in eastern Chula Vista. The traffic analysis is scheduled to be complete by Summer 2008. 5. Are current facilities able to accommodate forecasted growth (without exceeding the LOS threshold) for the 5-year timeframe? Yes No X (See response to #4 above.) If not, please list new roadways and/or improvements necessary to accommodate forecasted growth for the 5-year timeframe, and explain: a. How these facilities be funded; and b. If there is an appropriate/adequate mechanism(s) in place to provide this funding. 6. What is the status of the City's in~~sti~ntion of and remediation of traffic impacts generated by the Bayfront? For several years, the City of Chula Vista has been working with the San Diego Unified Port District and various stakeholders on the Bayfront project. The environmental document, which will address all project impacts, is still being prepared and is expected to be finalized and out for public review towards the end of calendar year 2008. FOllOW-UP ON lAST YEAR'S REPORTS 7. Is adequate funding secured and/or identified for maintenance of existing facilities? Yes _X_ No If no, please explain: The City has received apprOXimately $4 million in Gasoline Excise Tax and approximately $1 million from the Gasoline Sales Tax (Proposition 42) for Fiscal Year 2006-07. Approximately $5.5 million was available from TransNet, the %-cent regional sales tax. These are the traditional funding sources for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation. As a result of City staffs presentation to Council on pavement management at the April 5, 2007 workshop, Council subsequently adopted a resolution on May 1, 2007. This resolution transferred approximately $11.5 million from various projects and accounts into the pavement rehabilitation program. 8. Please provide a status of implementing a comprehensive pavement management system, inclusive of maintenance schedule. The City's Pavement Management consultant completed most of the work on the City's new Pavement Management System during Fiscal Year 2006-07. At the Council workshop on April 5, 2007 the overall results of the Pavement Management System were presented to Council. Although the City's overall pavement condition is classified as good, annual rehabilitation is required to prevent continued pavement deterioration. The goal is to perform the most cost-effective treatments to maintain the best overall pavement condition, not just to rehabilitate the "worst first". Council passed a resolution at that workshop reaffirming its' commitment to the implementation of a true Pavement Management System. Staff then generated various rehabilitation scenarios based on available funding. The City has begun to award pavement rehabilitation contracts based on these recommendations, and has awarded approximately $5.5 million in such contracts up to this date (January 2008) in Fiscal Year 2007-08. 9. Please provide a status of 1) freeway entrance/exit studies and/or synchronization of signals at intersections with Cal-Trans, and 2) improvement projects. Freewav entrance/exit studies with Caltrans Caltrans currently has a project that will widen the northbound ramps along Interstate- 805 at three locations: Bonita Road, the eastbound-to-northbound East H Street loop ramp, and Telegraph Canyon Road. This work is expected to start construction in the spring of 2008 and construction should be completed by Year 2010. This project will provide for a carpool only on-ramp lane and ramp metering. Once this project is completed, it is expected that all of thf.I,flI.~ metering that been installed along ~...~- " northbound 1-805, will be activated during the peak periods of the day. Svnchronization of sienals at intersections with Caltrans The synchronization of the City of Chula Vista traffic signals with the Caltrans interchange signals along 1-805 is still in progress. SANDAG is the lead agency on this project and they are working with the consultant and the local agencies of Caltrans, Chula Vista and the City of San Diego on this project. This project will be completed in calendar year 2008. The project is in the final stages of development testing and field- testing is scheduled to commence by spring 2008. Improvement Proiects Status The City of Chula Vista is currently working on the scope and budget with Caltrans and SANDAG on the Interstate-5 corridor study that will evaluate the entire corridor within Chula Vista. This study will determine the ultimate freeway interchange improvements that are needed along this corridor located between SR-54 and Main Street. The City of Chula Vista is currently working with Caltrans on two other projects for Interstate-80S: . The HOV/Managed Lanes project that will add High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes along the center shoulder area of 1-805. Project study limits for this project are from SR-905 in San Ysidro to the Sorrento Mesa 1-5/1-805 merge. The project is being studied in three independent phases. This project is in preliminary engineering and should be under construction by Year 2012. . Southbound 1-805 auxiliary lane project at Bonita Road. This project currently in design, will provide for two southbound lanes south of the 1-805/SR-54 interchange, one additional auxiliary lane to the southbound off-ramp at Bonita Road and one through lane towards the East H Street interchange. The general purpose of this project would be to reduce congestion by improving existing traffic operations on the 1-805 corridor, especially in the evening period. Construction will require the widening of the 1-805 over-crossing bridge at Bonita Road. Work to the auxiliary lanes will also be done in order to accommodate this additional auxiliary lane. When completed, there will be five southbound through lanes in this area and two auxiliary lanes. Construction is scheduled to begin in calendar year 201 O. 10. Has the LOS at the Heritage Road, between Olympic Parkway and Telegraph Canyon Road arterial segment improved since the opening of State Route 125? The answer to this question is unknown at this time. Unfortunately, SR-125 was not opened during this reporting period that ended on June 30, 2007. Having opened in November of 2007, City staff is just beginning to monitor the effect of SR-125 on local roadways such as Heritage Road. Traffic data was collected before the opening of SR- 125 and traffic data is currently being collected for the "post SR-125" analysis. MISCELLANEOUS 11. Do the current threshold standards need to be modified? Yes X No If yes, please explain: 1-142 During the General Plan Update and the Urban Core Specific Plan, the area north of L Street and west of Hilltop Drive has been approved for higher densities. The objective in this area is to encourage other modes of transportation besides the automobile. Therefore, levels of service are not the over riding consideration for this area. Staff would like to have discussions with the GMOC on potential levels of service criteria or goals for the Urban Core Specific Area. If the GMOC concurs, staff would prepare a threshold standard for the Urban Core Specific Area. 12. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. The threshold standard #2 for those areas west of 1-805 should be removed from the questionnaire, it is no longer applicable due to traffic monitoring program citywide based on the Highway Capacity Manual. PREPARED BY: Name: Francisco X. Rivera, P.E., T.E. Title: Principal Civil Engineer Date.: February 1, 2008 1-143 ~ ":"\'~''''~';,~, :.--_;~, ' .',c.-.]' ,","'.' ::;:~jr;:;n.;z::: ,c ' . ". . .' ,__'c._:.;'- -.c-',,- 'f '. GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT C6M~lssrQN. 2008 QUESTION~NAIRE '.. . . .. -_'_ - ,"-.'" ,i'-- ~.' _,':_ ;",;t,:_,'_ .',' c:'-,~ :__C'."_ ~:';'}:;":;~,~_'~, :'-jc":'~-~i;fl_Cf'-,:':-:-\-;'~'h;'~_;;;o;'1;{'-";{f"';--'"::; _',. n.'_ ":'-"J.:~:',.:,,~,---:- '_;_:.:.:,~ ::'- -::~~';';, \_ (Review Period: 7/1/06 ." 6/30(07 to the,: Curr:l!lI.t}:;m.~Tand Five Year Forecast) ;.. . . _.' . 'y ":""'''~1r\-~::~5,;,i-'.~')-:-:):~:; -":' _ '-~"P _ i.~,.t -;X;;~~f,-i:--~!::;:~1!f~~~i-7;.:,::,i~:'KF.:~~C'::4;:;~-' ;:.:_ .'; :",_~.~..j~-,:\~-:?\::" _-;~ir;-\""~'~ SCHOOLS'::: CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRicr::",.':t<, ;':',-","- ',,: ."', ~ ,- ,.,-,,,.-,-. THRESHOLD STANDARD: The City shall annually provide the two local school districts with a 12-to 18-month forecast and request an evaluation of their abilities to accommodate the forecast and continuing growth. The districts' replies should address the following: 1. Amount of current capacity now used or committed; 2. Ability to absorb forecasted growth in affected facilities; 3. Evaluation of funding and site availability for projected new facilities; and 4. Other relevant information the districts desire to communicate to the City and GMOC. 1. Please complete the table below, indicating the current enrollment and capacity conditions. EXISTING CONDITIONS DECEMBER 2007 Current Building Capacity Amount Type of Schools Enrollment UnderlOver Overflowed School Comments 10-04-07 Penn anent Portables Capacity' Out Calendar NORTHWEST Cook 543 506 93 53 3 Trad. Feaster-Edison 1088 400 715 27 Ext. Trad. Charter, TIIG Hilltop Drive 526 506 77 57 2 Trad. 1 NSH class, NCLB Mueller 1000 480 516 -4 63 Ext. Trad, Charter. TIIG, Two 7 &8 grade classes Rosebank 681 488 310 117 Trad. Vista Square 639 495 311 167 14 YRS 2 NSH, 1 SH, 4 DHH classes, TIIG SOUTHWEST Learning Comm, 585 600 Ext. Trad. Charter, NCLB Castle Park 480 430 159 109 5 Trad. Harborside 647 493 340 186 16 Trad. 2 NSH classes, TIGG-NCLB Kello9g 484 374 237 127 Trad. 2 NSH classes Lauderbach 741 488 425 172 YRS 2 NSH classes, TIIG-NCLB Loma Verde 462 479 219 236 1 YRS 1 SH class Montgomery 391 350 153 112 Trad. 1 NSH class Otay 598 477 173 52 26 Trad. TIIG Palomar 404 467 63 2 Trad. 1 NSH, 1 SH classes Rice 690 620 264 194 22 Trad. 3 NSH, 3 SH classes Rohr 410 456 31 77 3 YRS 2 NSH classes SOUTHEAST Arroyo Vista 828 710 142 24 9 YRS Charter Olympic View 819 484 368 33 43 YRS Parkview 437 498 70 131 1 Trad. 2 NSH, 2 SH classes, NCLB 1-144 Rogers 491 471 108 88 2 YRS Valle Lindo 585 402 247 64 Trad. 2 NSH classes Hedenkamp 990 1009 19 73 YRS 1 SH class Heritage 862 803 120 61 33 YRS Veterans 633 784 151 34 YRS 1 NSH, 2 SH classes McMillin 846 787 80 21 32 YRS Wolf Canyon .. 254 YRS 3 NSH classes m!n1r~~;I\\i ~~l~~~~~:~*t\ ii~__~ '~~!...""". -- lm~E~'~l.lt~' .~. >/_.,.., j'-:.1!'~~.-'.'.-;"" ". -, I!I;: ." ,. - ,-,~ Ji'i:.. '-".-- '. ~'" . ~ ~~~. ~~. ~; :.~~~! ~:~:_'.'x~"",.~_~ ,_,; ;'M'_": m~ > .,;:,;;..,~~lh,,~.":~i,' Allen/Ann Daly 421 446 25 Trad. 3 NSH classes Casillas 661 578 142 59 1 YRS Chula Vista Hills 563 534 80 51 Trad. 1 NSH class Clear View 541 494 120 73 Ex!. Trad. Charter, 1 SH class Discovery 800 592 357 149 YRS Charter, 2 SH classes Eastlake 687 528 259 100 YRS 1 NSH class Halecrest 493 494 80 81 Trad. 1 NSH class Liberty 655 759 104 YRS 4 NSH classes Marshall 733 643 133 43 48 YRS 1 NSH class Salt Creek 939 786 186 33 27 YRS Tiffany 612 494 217 99 Trad. '"TUG - Targeted Improvement Grant "NCLB - No child left behind "PI- Program improvement school 2. Please complete the tables below (insert new schools into the tables, as appropriate) to indicate the projected conditions for (a) December 2008 and (b) December 2012, based on the City's forecast. 2 a. 12- MONTH FORECASTED CONDITIONS -- DECEMBER 2008 Schools Projected Projected Capacity Amount Overflow Type of Comments Enrollment Permanent Portables OverlU nder Out School 12/31108 Capacity" Calendar NORTHWEST Cook 538 Feaster- Edison 1045 Hilltop Drive 493 Mueller 884 Rosebank 651 Vista Square 601 SOUTHWEST Learning 564 Comm, Castle Park 466 Harborside 632 Kellogg 462 Lauderbach 739 Lorna Verde 452 Montgomery 389 1-145 ~'\PI ANNING;\(.:;Mnl.\n7_0R RAVipwrvdp\Rtnri ()11,odif'lnn;::airi=>d11 ::lJ~\IF~n n7 nlir P::lnp? Otay 598 Palomar 384 Rice 613 Rohr 380 SOUTHEAST Arroyo Vista 836 Olympic View 795 Parkview 407 Rogers 404 Valle Lindo 564 Hedenkamp 968 Heritage 849 Veterans 618 McMillin 810 Wolf Canyon 500 NORTHEASJ .-_.' .'--._--'.'.' Allen/Ann Daly 406 Casillas 836 CV Hills 554 Clear View 526 Discovery 798 Eastlake 637 Halecrest 494 Liberty 627 Marshall 723 Salt Creek 950 Tiffany 572 *(-) denotes amount over capacity 2.b FIVE-YEAR FORECASTED CONDITIONS - DECEMBER 2012 Schools Projected Projected Capacity Amount Overflow Type of Comments Enrollment Permanent Portables Over/Under Out School 12/31/12 Capacily* Calendar NORTHWEST Cook 555 Feaster-Edison 1045 Hilltop Drive 427 Mueller 1052 Rosebank 566 Vista Square 676 SOUTHWEST Learning Comm. 560 Castle Park 417 Harborside 681 Kellogg 404 1-146 II.Inl ^"T"'I"lr\r~ll"r'1l7 (10 D~,,:~,..f'"'.._I_\n4_....j ". __4:____;~_~\...._ (""\/r-r-" 1"\, "'-__ n_~_ ') Lauderbach 806 Loma Verde 408 Montgomery 403 Otay 573 Palomar 413 Rice 562 Rohr 418 SOUTHEAST Arroyo Vista 824 Olympic View 695 Parkview 407 Rogers 410 Valle Lindo 566 Hedenkamp 858 Heritage 844 Veterans 577 McMillin 823 Wolf Canyon 690 NORTHEAST Allen/Ann Daly 412 Casillas(move 567 SE) Chula Vista Hills 535 Clear View 544 Discovery 831 Eastlake 637 Halecrest 534 Liberty 688 Marshall 700 Salt Creek 956 Tiffany 550 '(-) denotes amount over capacity PI I t h bl b I . d" II 3. ease com Die e t eta e e ow to In Icate enro ment history. ENROLLMENT HISTORY 2006-2007 2005-06 2004-05 2003-04 2002-03 NORTHWEST SCHOOLS Total Enrollment 4,447 4,445 4,409 4,567 4,587 % of Change Over 1% 1% 0% 0% the Previous Year 0% % of Enrollment 90% 99% 97% 97% from Chula Vista SOUTHWEST SCHOOLS Total Enrollment 5,892 ' 5,979 6,089 6,333 6,481 % of Change Over -1% -2% 4% -3% the Previous Year -2% % of Enrollment 90% 99% 97% 1-147 L-.l.\DI l'>.1\11\111\1r::\r.:~l1nr\{\7_nJ=! D,:>\,;clA,r",..lc\Pt,..,rI (l,"=I"',.t;n....,.,-:>i~"""'\11"'_('\Ir=C'n 1i7 '""""'"' 0",,.,,,,, A 1 from Chula Vista I I SOUTHEAST SCHOOLS T ctal Enrollment 6,923 6,525 6,369 5,854 4,825 % of Change Over 6% 2% 8% 17% 2% the Previous Year % of Enrollment 90% 99% from Chula Vista 97% 97% NORTHEAST SCHOOLS Total Enrollment 7,105 7,021 6,601 6,266 5,562 % of Change Over 1% 6% 5% the Previous Year 11% 3% % of Enrollment 90% 99% from Chula Vista 97% 97% DISTRICT WIDE Total Enrollment 24,397 23,970 23,020 21,455 21,348 % of Change Over 2% 4% 7% the Previous Year 1% 4% % of Enrollment 90% 98% 97% from Chula Vista 97% 97% Please provide brief responses to the following: 4. Has growth during the period under review negatively affected the school district's ability to accommodate student enrollment? Yes No x If yes, please explain: While the District has not had difficulty housing students, school construction costs may become prohibitive. The eastem portion of Chula Vista continues to grow in population while the western side declines. Due to the current methodology used by the State in determining unhoused student eligibility, our District currently does not qualify for State funding for school construction. 5. Are existing facilities able to accommodate forecasted growth through December 2008? Yes x No If no, please explain: 6. Are existing facilities able to accommodate forecasted growth for the 5-year (December 2012) time- frame? Yes No x If no, please explain: Additional schools will be constructed in the Otay Ranch Villages 11 and 2 as needed to serve students moving into the Otay Ranch area and as State funding becomes available. 1-148 Please complete t e ta e eow. School Site Architectural Commencement Service Commencement Time Selection Review/Funding of Site by of Construction Needed ID for Land and Preparation Utilities By Construction and Road Village X Plans approved by the X Awaiting CDE 11 Division of the State approval Architect. Awaiting final approval of California Department of Education Village X Phase I in Staff beginning X 2 process 2/08 prep for CDE approval h bl b I 7. Will new facilities/schools be required to accommodate forecasted growth over the next five years? Yes X No If yes, please explain: Schools are planned in each of the new Otay Ranch ViI/ages. Current plans have identified sites in Villages 11 and 2. 8. Have any of the schools planned in Otay Ranch Villages 2, 7, and 11 been built? Yes X No Wolf Canyon E/ementary School in Otay Ranch ViI/age 7 was completed and opened in July 2007. MAINTENANCE 9. Are there any growth-related issues affecting the maintenance of the schools as Chula Vista's population increases? Yes No X If yes, please explain: 10. Is adequate funding secured and/or identified for maintenance of existing facilities? Yes X No If no, please explain: 11. Within the school district's 1-year and 5-year Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs), are there any major upgrades proposed that will add capacity to existing facilities? Yes No X If yes, please explain: 12. Please comment on the school district's deferred maintenance plan in regards to maintaining schedules, ongoing or upcoming major projects, and funding availability, based on State Propositions 262 & 287. 1-149 U.\DI ^J\11\1'J\I~\r.:ro.iln("\Ji7 rHl p"'"j",,,r,,....I"'\D+........ r.,'~~+;........_...:~........\'l"... (",\/r:"('n n-r .J__ n___ C, The current five-year deferred maintenance plan was approved by the Board of Education on Apri/17, 2007, for fiscal years 2006-07 through 2010-11. Where appropriate, the District accesses State emergency repair funds made available through the Williams Settlement. 13. The GMOC understands the district is considering alternative site and facility design and configuration standards in response to the scarcity and cost of land in Chula Vista. Please update the GMOC on the status of this, including any current school site plans. The District has shifted to a two-story facility for the Otay Ranch Village 11 proposed school site. This design will be used on the Otay Ranch Village 2 site as well as the future Eastern Urban Center site. MISCELLANEOUS 14. Does the current threshold standard need to be modified? Yes No X If yes, please explain: 15. Please provide any other relevant infonnation, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. Continue frequent communication between the City and CVESD. Identify affordable school locations in western Chula Vista that will accommodate the increased student enrollment resulting from westem Chula Vista redevelopment and Bayfront development plans. The District continues to work with the Office of Public School Construction to increase its unhoused student eligibility. If eligibility is not increased, the District may not qualify for state school construction funding. Without continued state funding, school construction will not keep pace with growth. PREPARED BY: Name: Susan Fahle Title: Assistant Superintendent for Business Services and Support Date: February 4, 2008 1-150 ,,--- ...., APPROVED BY SUHSD BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 10, 2008 - : _ " :(~;~_ ;"-" : ':;',~!':,;f,::,' - _ ~"'l~;r:.< :"." '-::%~;~~:f.i'€~~;:~:; -.5/>~~/;;izMi;~c" ," - 'f{-'~:y~i::'_~~~:::~:~ _it~1:~~--~.~i.,<t'r~,:~_ ,'-" _ _ "_~ __~;_."'_' _~' ,-,c.' c." GROWTH M.A:NAGEMENT OVERSiGI:lt{fOIlllJIJIIS,SIO.N 2008QUElSTIO~NAIRE>. (~ey,ie~,r:~riod::71,1!06 -, ~*~'O?~g&~g,I!f':~~!Hl7le. an"d.f!v~::r,~~(t;g?~i;a~tt:~>;}'.. <:c..... . ., "~~HOOLS SWEE"fV\!~TER:H!,!!()N f:lIGIi SCHoqI:.DISTRICl:'!"i>~ ",,' .. THRESHOLD STANDARD: The City shall annually provide the two local school districts with a 12- to 18-month forecast and request evaluations of their abilities to accommodate the forecast and continuing growth. The districts' replies should address the following: 1. Amount of current capacity now used or committed; 2. Ability to absorb forecasted growth in affected facilities; 3. Evaluation of funding and site availability for projected new facilities; and 4. Other relevant information the districts desire to communicate to the City and GMOC. 1. Please complete the table below, indicating the current enrollment and capacity conditions. Current Building Capacity Adjusted Physical Within Overflowed Schools Enrollment Permanent/Portables Building Education Capacity Out Comments 11/07 (Note 1) Capacity' Capacity CURRENT CONDITIONS (2006/07 SCHOOL YEAR)) NORTHWEST Chula Vista Middle 1,127 1,140 270 1.410 220 X Hilltop Middle 1,306 1,200 210 1.410 220 X Chula Vista High 2,698 1,860 990 2,850 220 X Hilltop High 2.303 2,040 510 2,550 220 X SOUTHWEST Castle Park Middle 1,161 1,380 150 1,530 220 X Castle Park High 1,814 1.350 570 1,920 220 X Palomar High 448 360 240 600 100 X Chula Vista Adult 4.003 N/A N/A N/A N/A X ISOUTHEAST Eastlake High 2,400 2,460 480 2,940 220 X Eastlake Middle 1,514 1.665 0 1,665 220 X Otay Ranch High 2,742 2.600 300 2,900 220 X Oiympian High (HS#13) 856 2,460 0 2,900 220 X NORTHEAST Bonita Vista High 2,254 1,770 780 2.550 220 X Bonita Vista Middle 1,181 1.110 420 1.530 220 X Rancho Del Rey Middle 1,568 1,380 60 1,440 220 X Note 1: Capacity figures taken from Long Range Facility Master Plan (loaded at 30 students per classroom) _ September 2003, "Capacity is the adjusted building capacity plus physical education capacity. It excludes students and capacity assigned to special education and learning centers. 1-151 2. Please complete the tables below (insert new schools into the tables, as appropriate) to indicate the projected conditions for (a) December 2008 and (b) December 2012, based on the City's forecast. 2a 12-MONTH FORECASTED CONDITIONS -- DECEMBER 2008 Schools Projected Building Capacity Adjusted Physical Within Overflowed Comments Enrollment PermanentlPorlables Building Education Capacity Out 12131108 (Note 1) Capacity" Capacity NORTHWEST Chula Vista Middle 1,020 1,140 270 1,410 220 X Hilltop Middle 1,027 1,200 210 1,410 220 X Chula Vista High 2,653 1,860 990 2,850 220 X Hilltop High 1,969 2,040 510 2,550 220 X SOUTHWEST Castle Park Middle 1,459 1,380 150 1,530 220 X Castle Park High 2,225 1,350 570 1,920 220 X Palomar High 448 360 240 600 100 X Chula Vista Adult 4,003 NiA NiA NiA NiA X SOUTHEAST Eastlake High 2,781 2,460 480 2,940 220 X Eastlake Middle 1,504 1,665 0 1,665 220 X Otay Ranch High 2,755 2,600 300 2,900 220 X Olympian High 1,500 2,460 0 2,460 220 X NORTHEAST Bonita Vista High 2,236 1,770 780 2,550 220 X Bonita Vista Middle 971 1,110 420 1,530 220 X Rancho del Rey 1,459 1,380 60 1,440 220 X Middle Note 1: Capacity figures taken from Long Range Facility Master Plan (loaded at 30 students per classroom) - September 2003. 'Capacity is the adjusted building capacity plus physical education capacity. It excludes students and capacity assigned to special abilities clusters and learning centers. Page 2 1-152 2.b FIVE-YEAR FORECASTED CONDITIONS -. DECEMBER 2012 Projected Adjusted Physical Schools Enrollment Building Capacity Building Education Within Overflowed Comments. 12131/12 Permanent/Portables Capacity. Capacity Capacity Out (Note 1) (Note 3) NORTHWEST Chula Vista Middle 1,033 1,140 270 1,410 220 X Hilltop Middle 934 1,200 210 1,410 220 X Chula Vista High 2,432 1,860 990 2,850 220 X Hilltop High 1,880 2,040 510 2,550 220 X SOUTHWEST Castle Park Middle 1,419 1,380 150 1,530 220 X Castle Park High 2,082 1,350 570 1,920 220 X Palomar Hiqh 448 360 240 600 100 X Chula Vista Adult 4,003 N/A N/A N/A N/A X SOUTHEAST Eastlake High 3,118 2,460 480 2,940 220 Note 2 Eastlake Middle 1,834 1,665 0 1,665 220 Note 2 Otay Ranch High 2,740 2,600 300 2,900 220 Note 2 Olympian (HS#13) 2,723 2,460 0 2,460 220 Note 2 MS#12 Note 2 1,000 0 1,000 200 Note 2 HS#14 Note 2 2,000 0 2,000 200 Note 2 NORTHEAST Bonita Vista High 1,936 1,770 780 2,550 220 X Bonita Vista Middle 849 1,110 420 1,530 220 X Rancho del Rey 1,940 1,380 60 1,440 220 Note 2 Middle Note 1: Please note that these projections, prepared by Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) on April 20, 2007, on beha~ of the Sweetwater Union High School District, reflect projected enrollments based upon the students dwelling within the actual attendance boundary of the respective school. It should be further noted that the school district supports specialized programs at various schools, which allow students throughout the district to chose to attend schools other then their assigned school. The impact of this transfer policy is impossible to project beyond a one-year timeline. Therefore, the 2012 projections provided herein, are merely a projection by DDP of students residing in the respective school boundary. This projection is in the process of being updated in February 2008, and was not available in time for this report. Note 2: The district staff currently projects the need for Middle School 12/High School 14 in 2010. The school will relieve Eastlake and Rancho del Rey Middle Schools and Eastlake and Olympian High Schools. Since no boundary exists, no enrollment projections can be made nor can we project exactly how the affected schools' enrollment will be reduced. Note 3: Capacity figures taken from Long Range Facility Master Plan (loaded at 30 students per classroom) - September 2003. .Capacity is the adjusted building capacity plus physical education capacity. It excludes students and capacity assigned to special abilities clusters and learning centers. 1-153 Page 3 3. Please complete the table below to indicate enrollment history. ENROLLMENT HISTORY 2006-07 2005-06 2004-05 2003-04 2002-03 NORTHWEST SCHOOLS Total Enrollment 7,434 7,366 7,325 7,429 7,215 % of Change Over the Previous 0.9% 0.6% -1.4% 2.9% .8% Year % of Enrollment from Chula 88% 87% 88% 86% 87% Vista SOUTHWEST SCHOOLS Total Enrollment 3,423 3,582 3,926 4,041 4,129 % of Change Over the Previous -4.6% -9.6% -2.8% -2.1% 3.3% Year % of Enrollment from Chula 95% 91% 84% 81% 90% Vista SOUTHEAST SCHOOLS Total Enrollment 7,512 7,108 6,408 5,498 3,990 % of Change Over the Previous 5.4% 8.7% 14.2% 27.4% 33.3% Year % of Enrollment from Chula 87% 86% 87% 88% 85% Vista (Note 1) NORTHEAST SCHOOLS Total Enrollment 5,003 4,997 4,873 4,845 5,271 % of Change Over the Previous 0.1% 2.5% 0.6% -8.8% -1.2% Year % of Enrollment from Chula 95% 96% 97% 97% 96% Vista DISTRICT WIDE Total Enrollment 42,408 41,680 41,853 40,967 39,290 % of Change Over the Previous 1.7% -0.4% 2.2% 4.2% 3.6% Year % of Enrollment from Chula 48% 48% Vista 55% 52% 49% 4. Has growth during the period under review negatively affected the district's ability to accommodate student enrollment? Yes If yes, please explain: No x N/A 5. Are existing facilities/schools able to accommodate forecasted growth through December 2008? Yes -X- No N/A If no, please explain: Page 4 1-154 6. Are existing facilities/schools able to accommodate forecasted growth for the 5-year (December 2012) time frame? Yes x No If no, please explain: Please complete the table below. School Site Architectural Commence- Service Time Selection Review/Funding ment of Site by Commencement Needed ID for Land and Preparation Utilities of Construction By Construction and Road 7-12 Complete Complete Complete Complete Est. 2009 Est. 2010 7. Will new facilities/schools be required to accommodate forecasted growth over the next five years? Yes X No The 7-12 campus is located in Village 11 of Otay Ranch. 8. Please provide status of high schools 13 and 14. Construction at Olympian High School (High School 13) is completed and the school is occupied. Status Middle School 12/Hiqh School 14: A. Site Selection - Completed B. Architectural Review - Completed C. Funding identification for land and construction - Completed D. Commencement of site preparation - Completed E. Service by utilities and road - Completed F. Commencement of construction - In 2009 (if needed) 1-155 Page 5 9. Please list current and potential joint use activities/facilities between the City of Chula Vista and the Sweetwater Union High School District SCHOOL Bonita Vista High Bonita Vista Middle Castle Park High Castle Park Middle Chula Vista Adult ORGANIZATION American Red Cross Registrar of Voters New Hope Community Church AYSO SDSU City of Chula Vista SO Adult Baseball Gloria World Mission Black Belt AREA OF USE Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Gym/Auditoriums for Voting Gym/Cafeteria/Class room Athletic Fields Classrooms Gym/Classroom Athletic Fields Athletic Fields American Red Cross Registrar of Voters City of Chula Vista 123 College.com AYS0116 Bonita Country Day School Bonita Valley ASA Girl Scouts of America Marian High School Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Gym/Auditoriums for Voting Gym/Classroom Cafeteria Athletic Fields Athletic Fields Athletic Fields Auditorium Athletic Fields American Red Cross Registrar of Voters YMCA CV Youth Football CV Youth Soccer CV Sundevils Softball Cas tie Park Elementary Parkview Elementary UCSD Starlings Volleyball Make-A-Wish Foundation S.D. Adult Baseball League Bowl Games of America Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Gym/Auditoriums for Voting Roller Hockey, Gym Stadium, Press Box Athletic Fields Athletic Fields Auditorium Auditorium Cafeteria Gym Athletic Fields Athletic Fields F-ball Stadium, Auditorium, Classes CV Youth Soccer Registrar of Voters South Bay Little League CV Rangers Soccer Athletic Fields Gym/Auditoriums for Voting Athletic Fields Athletic Fields American Red Cross Registrar of Voters c.v. Community Church Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Gym/Auditoriums for Voting Adult Classes Page 6 1-156 Norman Park Center Adult/Senior Classes Fredericka Convalescent Hospital Classroom Salvation Army Classroom Chula Vista High American Red Cross Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Registrar of Voters Gym/Auditoriums for Voting CV Childrens Choir Classroom CV Pony North Athletic Fields CV Youth Football Stadium CV Youth Soccer League Athletic Fields SO Sun Harbor Chorus Classroom Hot Spurs, USA Athletic Fields A YSO Region 290 Athletic Fields CV Badgers Wrestling Weight Rooms SO Flyers Youth Track Athletic Fields Huff 'n Puff Soccer Athletic Fields Starlings Volleyball Gym YMCA Athletic Fields City of CV, Recreation Dept F-ball Stadium, Athletic Fields City of CV, Youth Center Community Center Chula Vista Middle American Red Cross Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Registrar of Voters Gym/Auditoriums for Voting Eastlake High American Red Cross Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Eastlake Youth Football-Cheer Athletic Fields Registrar of Voters Gym/Auditoriums for Voting City of Chula Vista Library City of Chula Vista Chapman Perf. Arts Ctr City of Chula Vista Park and Recreation Areas Eastlake Community Church Gymnasium Minato Gakuen Japanese Classrooms, Perf. Arts, School Athletic Fields Cornerstone Church Gymnasium Communidad Cristiana Church Gymnasium Eastlake Middle CV Elementary School District Classrooms Registrar of Voters Gym/Auditoriums for Voting CV Youth Soccer Athletic Fields Eastlake lillie League Athletic Fields Aram Studios Music Lessons Cafeteria Hilltop High American Red Cross Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Registrar of Voters Gym/Auditoriums for Voting Page 7 1-157 Hilltop Middle Olympian High Otay Ranch High Palomar High Rancho Del Rey Middle Cornerstone Church CV Flyers CV Badgers CV Youth Football AAU Baseball City of CV Recreation Dept. City of CV-Police Dept. SD County Office of Education SD Church of Christ American Red Cross Registrar of Voters City of CV National University CV Elementary School District CV Badgers Wrestling CV East National Basketball CORR Offroad Racing YMCA American Red Cross Registrar of Voters U.S. Olympic Training Center City of CV, Police Dept Eastlake Little League Rancho Vista Covenant Church Mater Dei Church Rebel Soccer County of San Diego Southwestern College, Track Team California State Soccer Games Bonita Valley ASA Softball Mercury SD Track & Field Twin Hills Girls Softball Starlings Volleyball American Red Cross Registrar of Voters Choice Parenting American Red Cross Registrar of Voters City of Chula Vista 1-158 Gymnasium Athletic Fields Gymnasium Athletic Fields Athletic Fields Stadium Stadium Gym/Classrooms Cafeteria Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Gym/Auditoriums for Voting Auditorium Auditorium Auditorium Gymnasium Gymnasium Cafeteria Athletic Fields Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Gym/Auditoriums for Voting Various Athletic Venues: Track & Field, Athletic Fields Athletic Fields Auditorium Auditorium Athletic Fields Auditorium Track & Field Athletic Fields Athletic Fields Athletic Fields Athletic Fields Gymnasium Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Gym/Auditoriums for Voting Classrooms Gym/Auditoriums for Emg's Gym/Auditoriums for Voting Park and Recreation Areas Page 8 Bonita Valley ASA Ranger Soccer Pima Medical Institute AYSO Soccer SO County Office of Education South Bay YMCA Girl Scouts SO Church of Christ Filipino American Educators Assoc MAINTENANCE Athletic Fields Athletic Fields Classrooms Athletic Fields Auditorium Athletic Fields Auditorium Auditorium Auditorium 10. Are there any growth-related issues affecting maintenance of the facilities/schools as Chula Vista's population increases? Yes No X If yes, please explain: 11. Is adequate funding secured and/or identified for maintenance of existing facilities/schools? Yes No X If no, please explain: The State may not fully fund deferred maintenance accounts. 12. Within the school district's 1-year and 5-year Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs), are there any major upgrades proposed that will add capacity to existing facilities/schools? Yes X No If yes, please explain: Proposition 0 passage will allow the District to continue modernization and limited new construction efforts on the west side. Capacity exists currently on the east side with the 2006 opening at Olympian High School (High School 13). A campus for grades 7-12 has completed design and will complete DSA approval by mid-2008. It is positioned to start construction, but is not needed until 201 0 (projected). The site has been acquired. Construction on Proposition 0 projects in 2009 will include Hilltop High School, Chula Vista High School and Chula Vista Middle School. MISCELLANEOUS 13. The GMOC understands the district is considering alternative site and facility design and configuration standards in response to the scarcity and cost of land in Chula Vista. Please update the GMOC on the status of this, including any current school site plans. We have a three-story campus design with grades 7-8 on a portion of the campus and a 9-12 campus adjacent with shared service facilities. Please see the response to question number 8 for the status. 1-159 Page 9 14. What will be the impact (such as student recruitment) of High Tech High School on the district? At this time, we have not received sufficient information in order to predict what impact High Tech High School will have on our district. 15. Does the current threshold standard need to be modified? Yes No x If yes, please explain: 16. Please provide any other relevant information, recommendations or suggestions that you would like to relay to the GMOC and/or the City Council. None. PREPARED BY: Name: Date: Planning Department January 30, 2008 Page 10 1-160 RESOLUTION NO. PCM-08-04 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2008 GMOC ANNUAL REPORT, AND RECOMMENDING ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the City's Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) is responsible for monitoring the City's threshold standards for the City's eleven growth management quality of life indicators, and submitting their annual report to the Planning Commission and City Council; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15061 (b )(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA; and WHEREAS, on May 15,2008, the GMOC finalized its 2008 Annual Report; and WHEREAS, the report covers the period from July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007, identifies current issues in the second half of2007 and early 2008, and assesses threshold compliance concerns looking forward over the next five years; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 2008, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed joint public hearing with the City Council to consider the 2008 GMOC Annual Report, and to make recommendations to the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept and forward the 2008 GMOC Annual Report and recommendations contained therein; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council accept the 2008 GMOC Annual Report. Presented by: Approved as to form by: L L City A~ 'jCf1 Nancy Lytle Acting Director of Planning J:\Altomey\RESQ\PLANNING\PLANNING COMMISSJON\Accepl 2008 GMOC Annual Report_06.05-08,do~ 1-161 RESOLUTION NO. 2008- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2008 GMOC ANNUAL REPORT, AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO UNDERTAKE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AS PRESENTED IN THE STAFF RESPONSES AND PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SUMMARY WHEREAS, the City's Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) is responsible for monitoring the threshold standards for the City's eleven growth management quality of life indicators, and reporting their findings and recommendations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA; and WHEREAS, on May 15,2008, the GMOC finalized its 2008 Annual Report; and WHEREAS, the report covers the period from July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007, identifies current issues in the second half of 2007 and early 2008, and assesses threshold compliance concerns over the next five years; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 2008, the City Council held a duly noticed joint public hearing with the Planning Commission to consider the 2008 GMOC Annual Report; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon considering the Report, recommended that the City Council accept the Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista accepts the 2008 GMOC Annual Report; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council directs the City Manager to undertake actions necessary to carry out the implementing actions as presented in the Staff Responses and Proposed Implementing Actions Summary on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Presented by: Approved as to form by: 7 Nancy Lytle Acting Director of Planning J:\Altomey\RESO\PLANNING\Accepl2008 GMOC Annual Rcport_06-05-0S.dOl: 1-162 -- ,:: ::s /'t) f.11 ... N o o 00 /-, '/~':\ , Ii X ,- (:=J '<~f1 r--:== ':::J c~~ r:::.---------~ --::::J~ ~=v;] ,= I/~ \::'j i' ~I ~ ~ . I~ (J OGJ ~. ~ ~ '-< < ~ = (J ~ 0 P- o GJ = ~- ~ = ~ n OQ~ ~. =-=- 0 ~ -- (J 1-0 ~~ ~ -..c ~ 0 = n~ ~. = o = = ~. f""P' = = ~ ~ ClQ =~ (J 0 ""t 0 tn- 9 ~ s r;n ::r S ~_ rD 0 ~. o = ~ r;n r;n = ~ ~. 0 = , I, \" I' " (/~ ~ - o z ;;0 ~, ~ cS' ::: ~ v' ,l{! ''.- <j, t ~ m ~ L'> --:.~; .., ;?- ;" \~ ~,J. 52 Ei ~~~i~~ ~~ ~~~ .~~ !a U I\) o o CO )> ~ ~ c: Q) - :;tJ CD -C o .., .... es ~&. ~~ ~~ I ... ... ... . . . ~ ~ 0 G'), OJ """' lJ1 n 0 :J rt ~ c: OJ 0 I ::; , OJ -. cr I ..., ~ ro 3:, "< ..., 0 Q) 11 ro ;0 0 ~ ro 3 Q) -. ro ro ^ (Q rt 3 - - (I) a. "< ..., ro -. 3 tn --I 3: OJ tn (I) ..., rt -. ~ ro 0 -. ... 1:J ro ~ 0 rt -. < :J (I) lO .., tn CJ) -. cc :T ... i G) 3: o o :I: -- tn r+ o ~ A) ~ c. -c .., o n (I) c. c: .., (I) tn A ~i ~n~ i~ ~~~~~ ~ Q .., o ~ill ::r s:: (0) o ::J 3 0) 3cg ur 3 ~. (D o ::J ::J ...... o < (D Ci1 -. c.c :r ...... A Eli :\I~~ ~~ ~~~u~ ~ == ::r o -- tn ~ ::r CD G) s: o o -.v G) .., o ! ::T o~ o ::::s 3 Q) 3cg Cir 3 tn CD -. ::::s o r+ ::::s 0 < CD ..., tn -. cc :T r+ "tJ - en Q) :::a :E ;j CD ;j m c CD CD en C') en -. ;j CD m "'C ;j m l 0 CD 0 cc < < a. ~ s::: ;j s::: s::: -. CD s::: CD rot' C') fA ~ - D) rot' CD rot' -. 0 0 0 en rot' ::r ::r 0 ;j ;j Q) CD :E ~ "C CD :::t CD 3 CD 3 3 rot' C') Q) -. ::J CD fA 0 m -. tn 3 CD CD fA ~ tn ;j .... 0 rot' rot' -. ;j ;j -. ;j fA rot' rot' ::J -. fA CC rot' -. Q) 0 ;j ^ C- CD (f) 0 < 0 -I (f) 0 m < 0) ::J c: ~ s: 0) ~ ::u 3 0) CD ..., ::J 0) < < c: (') (') ::J 0 ::J ::J CD 0.. CD en CD CD - CD "'U 3 en (f) I Z . () ^ "'U I c: () () CD OJ C- O) C'" ::r -. 0 ::J ..., 0) ~ - - 0) 0 - Q) ~ Q) Q) - N :::::I Q) (I) 0 - c.a 3 - -. '< N CD ., - ::J ..., ~ () .., :::r Q) 0 CD (f) (f) :::::I ::r - Q) -. ., E~ ~~~ ~~ !t~~~ ~ . G) s: o o s: CD 3 e- CD .., en ~.~ ~~[~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ::T Q) .... G) .., o ~. :::r :s: o~ o ::::s 3 ~ 3cg -. 3 ~ CD -. ::::s o .... ::::s 0 < CD Ci1 -. (Q :::r .... c o (D tn .... ::T (D G) s: o o c o .~ 52 ~~~~ ~~ ~~ I 0 .c CD "'C --I n c: ::J ..., ::r G) n OJ ::r 0 CD c: lC .., - OJ 0 -. G) ..., t""t' ::J ..., !. (J) -< OJ n 3: . 3 ::F 0 CD 0 -n 3: "'C t""t' n (") D) - 0 -. c: 0 ::1 -n -. CD cr "'C 3 3 D) - cc -. ..., 3 OJ n CD "'C (I) (J) (J) - -- 3 (J) CD en lC ro ro 3 en (I) ..., -- ::1 ..., ..., 0 0 < < ro ::1 r+ ro 0 ~ -. ::J n OJ t""t' < t""t' CD (J) (I) :::J'" (J) ::::J .., 0.. OJ en OJ -- cc ::J f- 0.. r+ A t~ ~J~ ... .+. .+. .+. ~~ ~~ + + + + ~ U ~ ......-t --I 0 G) G') 3 ::r- c- o ... ..., 0 ~. OJ "'C CD CD ~ - - CJ) n CD ::r- rt ::r 3 0 -. < 3: CD - 0 c.. CD Q) ~ CJ) 0 :::J rt (f) 3 Q) OJ rt 3 cc rt OJ CD -. -. 3 0 ~ U) ~ c.. U) CD -. :::J OJ 0 3: ..., :::J r+ CD c.. 0 OJ CJ) < CD (f) .., c U) -. ..., (Q CD ::r (f) r+ ;u""'Or"T1 CD Q) cr en" (') .., .., (') .., ~ Q) n'\ CD en .., WJ Q) '<- .-+Qo -" o ::J ~i ~f~~ i~ !~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~:!1""'OO(J) Q) .., 0 .., CD """"hCD=:Q):E ......, ,.... - " -" -- \,~ ::J (')mCDQ)~ s: (Q (J) CD o ..... . ~ o o ::3 ;r o -.. D c: I>> =0 ~::T o =- .....1>> C< ..... -.. CD tn r+ -I>> ~ '-W c.tn -. n I>> r+ o U1 W?~ ~ ::J"""'Q) 00'-+ ...... o c: ~ (I) :3 (jfQ?. -- Q) .-+ -.. '< + D)G) 5.3: "'Co -0 D) ::::s~ ::::s .., 5' m (Q CD o~ o CJI 3 !! 3 ::::s _. D) CJI - !!!. ::a o CD ::::s~ I 0 3::: D) 0 ~o c.... -. c:~ ::::So CD 0 s:::: ::::s o -. - .. G) 3: o o Q, .., D) ii (jJ ~ o ;::1. D) ::::s Q, .., CD o o 3 3 CD ::::s a. D) .... -. o ::::s CJI t G) 3: o o Q, Cir o s:::: CJI CJI CD CJI ~ -. .... ::r o -. ~ CJI or == D) ::::s Q, C) (Q CD ~ o -. CD CJI .. G) 3: o o (jJ < CD' ~ CJI (jJ CJI ~ o ::::s CJI CD CJI .. Q,O CD -. ~~ D)Q, ;::1. -. 3 CJI CD q- ::::s -. ....C" CJI s:::: .... C) CD ::::s CJI Q,O' D) .., (Q CD CD 0 ::::s D) o CJI -. .... CD D) CJI ::::s Q, .c s:::: CD CJI .... -. o ::::s ::::s D) -. .., CD CJI .... o o -. ~ CJI .... C) == ~ .., CD ~ D) .., CD CJI ::a CD CJI -. Q, CD ~ .... Dr - G) .., o ~ ::r "T1 o .., CD o D) CJI .... c.... s:::: ~ . o o .... o C" CD .., Q 3: o n -c .., o n (D tn tn ... ... --I ~ ~J*' . . i~ !~ ::J'" --I QJ 0 ;;C ro 0 r-t' -. ro G) -a (f) Q ..., < I ro n -. :s: .., r-t' r-t' c: ro 0 0 0 ..., (f) ~ ~ I ro (f) n OJ QJ ro ro r+ . . ::r 0 r-t' c.. c.. r-t' QJ ..c 3: r-t' r-t' 0 :J ::J'" c: Q) 3 c.. ..., ro :::c :s ro (f) Q) ..., c.. (f) r-t' CD cc c: ::J'" -. < ro 0 CD -. < ..., 0 CD 3 -. :J - ~ -. :J ro c.. :J CD lC ~ QJ :s (f) -. r+ r-t' ..., QJ ro ""C :J en .., 0.. 0 QJ cc ..., .., c.. Q) 3 (f) ... . Ei ~r~~ ~~ !~~~ ~ ~g):>--i t8 c () 0 ..., Qj" 0 I 3 < 3 rt _""'C 0 (J) ..., I rt ro OJ OJ ::J'" 0 r'\ ro n- Ul ~ n- ..., (J) 0 o <" 3 ~ ro .. ::J'" ;0 3: ro OJ ::5 " ~ ro OJ ~ lC ro 0 3 -h ro g: ~ ro rt G) .., o ~. ::r s: Q). :;a::J to cu. <(Q _. to ~ ~ ::J ... -0 ..., o co .., cu 3 . . . ... A . e~ IJ~ . "'U -i 0 -i m -i :::r 0 ii~ )~~ 0 0 :::r - :::r ........ CD CD CD CD --t'\ :J ~ ;4. (') 3 n -. G) c: G) G) 'i1 0 - G) 3 CD 0 ::} .., .., CD C en 0 CD 0 ::} c c.. ., ~ ~ ,...... ::} 0 ::} CD ..., ro 0 ,...... ,...... ,...... ~ ~ ---t\ :::r - . :::r () .., 0 (J) Q) ,...... 0 " :::r s: s: - 0 ;:0 ::T 3 CD Q) Q) -u n ro 3: "'C - c -i ::} ::} Q) < - :::r Q) Q) CD ::} 3 -. D) .., (Q (Q ,...... ro ::2 CD CD CD CD G) ro ~ ::;a D) a. en 3 3 .., :J (I) 0 CC :::J'" -. r-t' OJ < 0 CD CD ::} ~ (I) (J) :J -. - ::} ::} I\V ,...... (I) 3 a. ,...... ,...... 0 :::J'" c.. :e en 0 "'U 0 s: () ):> (I) ,...... .., .., (J"I ::::s Q) a. 0 --- Q) 0 3 ...... ::} -. (Q ::} 3 Cl. ::} .., Q) ro -a Q) Q) Q) (Q ., .., :J 3 CD :J 0 a. (') 0 c.. 3 cc en CD ::J 3 - . CD ro ., Q) ::} :J ro A) ::} ,...... 3 r-t' :J a. (J) r-t' . . (J) ~ ti~~ . ~~ !!~~~ ~ G) ^ ~ s: CD ...... .., 0 < 0 -- () :J C. () 0 c:: ::r n Q) "" z ...... -- ., -- 3 CD 0 Q) -- ~ :J ;!;(/) co:;; :::T(I) (/)(1) (")~ :::Tw 0_ 0(1) -.., Oc (j)' :J :r. O' (") :J - (/)O-"-"~ OJ (") < -" 0 :::T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Om(/) -I "T1 :::I" .., 0 ~ w o CD 3- m ::;" 0 C;- - 2: :::J g3o~~3:3:&r::;:Q. '" (I) 0 0" m '< '< CD" ~a(ij" s::=- CIJ -" W (/) ~-< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< 9> ~ ="" ~ N -" ;U-...J (I)" q~oc:~(/)}>:!! (I) w e1" C" w 9! ::;" '" 2!.~ W CD < 0 @ o' ~ ~ (I)~. ~ ~ c :J!/OCO '" w CD ;:::;: '< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< ~ Ii! III '::1' o 0. >< >< -I ::r ~ CD III ::r o is: s: CD - -I '::1' ~ CD s:~ CD 0 -- 0. 2 o - >< <""T1"t1 30s,0 I: - "'O~CD ::CD=- III -. ::I 2111 <,,00' CD=?.... () )> 0)>-10. 3 <" ~ 0 .;:; '::1' - "C >< ::. -, ;:::. ~ iii' ~ in "T1 ::lCD_I: <" 0::1 CD 0. N o o ..... -t J: :;tI m en :::cJ: mO <r mO :;Ecn "tI-t m)> :::CZ 00 0)> -...J:;tI ::'0 -- 01 Q) -I)> IZ :::CZ Oc: c)> (j)r I Q):;tI --m ~< -- - Om -...J:2E en c: 3!: 3!: )> ~ -i ::J'" .., (D (f) ::J'" o - c.. " -" ::J c.. -" ::J . . ~ :J n o 3 "'0 Q)" :J n CD N ........ (')'-"-1 OO::::r i'D!:jiro ~""""G) ro;;U3: a..roO ~ -g (") a...?-II) ::::r ro <:: OJ X < - "'0 ::::r - ro -. 0'" ::J 9- ro ~"'O "'0 ,..,. ..... ..... ......00 o < <. < -. a.. ro a.. ro ..... rn a.. stOJ~ ro ::J ;:;: "'0 OJ ::::r ..... ::J OJ ro OJ ..... < _...J 0' ~ OJ c: -. ::J II) II) ::J ~ 0 c: ~"'""t>OJ ~a..- 3 ro 0 o < ro ::J ro < r-I" 0 ro ::::r"'O 0 "03"0 ro ro 3 ..... ::J ro o'r-I":J a.. -. r-I" . 3 ~ "0 3 OJ "0 (') OJ r-I"(') (D'r-I" ro "T1 II) ro ro ........ ........ "'O"Oro ro ..... < 8""0 -I :J..9 OJ ..... ..... ::::r o ro' c: 3 ~ ro a.. (') n, II) -. . r-I"..... a.. G) ro r-I" 0 ([) a..ro "'""t>1I) 3: I.COJoOJO .....(')"0.....(") o r-I" ro ...J ~ ffi ..... ro II) r-I"_OJ<ffi" ::::r I.C !:!: OJ - 0-- ~ ~ ~ ~ g ..... r-I" OJ 0 "0 r-I"::::r::J::J..... ::::roa..o~ ro < (') "'""t> -. ::J ro OJ r-I" a.. '" ..... "'0 ::::r ro ~st;:;:roa.. ro OJ -. ~ ........ _. 3 ;:;: N"O 3"'O::::r I..... OJ r-I"!;g~(')OJ o -. 0 !if ::J ........ g ~ 0 OJ (X) II) 3 "'""t>::J I ::J 3........rol.Cc: o~::JaOJ g5!Jf~~ ::J -I ::::r (') 16 st :!. 0 OJ ..... II)::J-. 0" "O([) ..... r-I" 3 a.. ([)::::r "0 ... :J."'O ro OJ OJOO()(') ::J ...a.. ;::+ -. rt a..OJII)::<ro l{1 II) 5" 0'" "0 -< ~ c: 0 Q roro-r-I"r-I" OJ=a..::::r<:: -, _0 < OJ ::J::::r II) (') . ::::r -i ::J'" .., (D (f) ::J'" o - c.. U1 I"""t' OJ ::J c.. OJ .., c.. (f) e~ ,,~ i~ !~~~ '" . . " -- tn n Q) (f) -. (f) LV ~ /""t" :::J ro ;;:0 1--1 . ~8 i~~ OJ@"_CD (f) :::J -h OJ ....... ii~ !~ Cl.:::J I - (f) . -h - $1 OJ c.. -. 0 c: ....... ~ ro :::J n c..c..OJOJ CD 3: (f) :::J /""t" . -::r n -. . . OJ ro :::J OJ (f) lC -. c.. :J _ _. n ro :::+: 0 t""'t' ;::pro = ro /""t" ~ ro :J -::rron ro :::J /""t" OJ /""t"CD n""O c.. :J -. ~ 3 n ~S. ro 0 :E ro :::J 0 n ;::::t: /""t" CD' ~ -::rVl(f) OJ cr:E 0 " :::J ~ ;::::t: ro -. :E -::r < -- :::J -. fA OJ -::r:::J ro -. - o-n /""t" 0 n -. -::r -::r - .:i /""t" ro Q) -::r ""'0 3 /""t" ro c 0 3 0- ro 3 0 n' :J ro :::J t""'t' ro ""T1 /""t" CD OJ ....... n (f) n 3 CD :E -. ;::+ /""t" ro -. CD OJ OJ ~ VI -. CD n :::J 0 :::J t""'t' /""t" 0 1--1 -::r "TI "TI ~ /""t" ro ""T1 ro (f) c ro -::r :::J fJ) 0 c.. c.. /""t" 0 0 ....... "TI ;:;or"t"r"t""7 OJ:::r:::r~ roroO ::J ::J q. n ""0 -. -' -. c: ro O~o-(f) 0.. -. = ro (t) (J") n OJ -c..,,"""I ;:;O::JOJ3 roOJnOJ --< .......=:"""1 ~;::::t:7' = ro -. (t) o-r"t"~o.. """10'" OJ 00' ~ 3......."""1 . "'.." \1.1. r (t) -. r"t"<o- r"t"<CJ :::r;::::t:"""I ro ::T (t) . r"t"::J(J") ~O::E ro """I ro (f) (t) """I :::r"'O ro o OJ C 0.. --< (f) (J") 3 ro r"t"roo.. OJ::J-1'I ::Jr"t"O o..(f)"""I OJ n 0 """I:::rr"t" o..ro:::r QJ 0.. ro ::J C ...., o..ro"'O n 0.. a o OJ 1,.,.;.,. ::Jr"t"ro (f) n r"t"r"t"r"t" ...., :::r (f) c: -. n (f) ::E r"t" r"t" -. _. r"t" r"t"3::T :::r -. ro ro ::J ... -1'1-1 C:::r ::J (t) 0......, (f) (t) O':::r ...., OJ r"t"(f) :::ro- (t). ro ...., ro -. ::J ~::J ro 0 ::J OJ 0.."'0 (t)"'O 0.. OJ c: """I (J") ro ro ::J . r"t" OJ n n o C ::J r"t" OJ 0- -. .!i ::J ...., ro "'0 QJ --< -. ::J lO 0- o ...., ...., o ::E (t) 0.. o -. (f) n c: (f) (f) -. o :J . . ,,+<<'^ w Ei f!~ ~~ !~U!~ I'" . I--L . I--L 3: QJ -. :::J r1" CD :::J OJ :::J n CD o """'h o CD < CD - o 11 -- tn n ~ 3 CD :::J r1" J--f 3 QJ n r1" -n CD CD en o J--f -n V) 1:J ~ @ ::J :b- e:: C3 -' I V) c:: r:;:- ~75' ~ ~ :3 5 ~. (j .." :::t! ~ c:: ::J g:1:J 0 O~ ""'::JC3::E5i:::r 8" V) 75' III 1:J g:. ::::hg:.(')~C3(!) S; 0'""" Gr ~ "', \J ~ :::r(JjCbc:: Q.. I~ OJ (;::, R CJ- OJ ......., v. (Jj :::::: ::::::: :::r 05 0'" (') ;:;:!CJ-CJ-~r:;.:~ \U c:: (!) ~ -, .... :3~(!)(!)V)~ OJ ...... ::J :3-' :S' 6 -, 2' III !::!: :So c:: ::J ::J ::J ffi ~ ~ 8 Q..~ Q 1:J ::J -a :::r (!) (!) C3~o~Q..05 75' Qj ~ CJ- ~ 0- ~@"~ffilll-g (Jj g:. ...... ::J 1:J ~ :::;. (!) :S' Cl. 0 (!) ~ <:'1-(!)O~ g:.eo05ro~ (!)=i03'-Q..:3 \J ftj (!) .g ::::h 1:J ;:Q~V)(!)S~ '-J !:fQ..Q.."'" :=n ~ e:: Ill' :n . ~2-5.~ffi S" fti OJ 8 s' .....::::::: f) (j :3 -.. c:AJrti"'Oe:: '"""(!):3rti~ (1) -=::: III :::r V) (i)' ~ :s' (!) ~ :S' ~ \U ~ _. 05 (J) fir ~ ;0 (I) (J) o ::J (J) (I) 2'0')> :J -r n 0-~3 ([)-c -r -r I ([) 2'~ :J ro O-:J VI (rl <. OJ ([) - -C o _ n OJ QJ ::J r-f" -. ....,., :J 0 lQ -r r-f" -r ~ro QJ-C r-f"QJ 0"< n 3 n ([) c: :J ~ r-f" ::E ~ r-f" ....,., ~c: -. ::J :J 0- r-f" VI ~::J ro ro "'O([) c: 0- cr VI n g -no- OJ ro n CD r-f" (J) ([) r-f" VI QJ cr OVl ~~ -nro 0- . . ;c CD n o 3 3 CD :J Q.. OJ r-t' -. o :J . . LV ....... . ....... E! IS~% i~ !~~~ ~ :s: OJ -, ::J no CD ::J OJ ::J n CD o """h o CD < CD o ." -- en n D) 3 CD ::J no 1--1 3 OJ n r-t' 11 CD CD (f) o 1--1 11 n ""'t orog.......Q)"'C 3 \C ro ~ :J ""'t Q. ~ "'C 3" QJ -ocn:Ja.OCD~C -o~ QJ. ~ ~. 1""1': ~ @ ~ ~ (A "'C "'C 0 _. ~ '1.1 c.. _. ro r" "" ""'t < .... 0 ",,' \C -T\ ..... ,1.1 0 r; :J ~ l!> -. C CD. 10. ~ 3 < c: !" '" ~ :J g ro '" ffi ~ gJ ~ ffi ~~g~~~' 8" fir c..QJ \C c.. I....""'t "" ""'t c..c:J QJ c.. ;. ro '1.1 ro ""'t 0 a.. 8 ro ~ n g ro 3 S' < _. 3 ~ c Q ~ < ro \C ro :J QJ ~ QJ QJ rT < \C "'C 0 _ (f) rT :J (f) ::::r -. QJ =: "'C ri (f)' ~ rT C ro ~ =i' ~ 3 "<:; fir n ~ ~ "'C <: ..0 n ro ~ :J -. \C (f) ::::!. Q) C ro ~ \C rT 1"'1" -. c.. 0 :J QJ .. <"<:; 0 ",,""'t c.. _ :E ""'t C ::: (f)~ :J VI ~ri ;:;: ro QJ rt c.. QJ -. -< ro "<:; ...... n. d: ::::r "" - \C ro < ~ .... 0 ,1.1 QJ:J QJ Q) QJ~fir:JP~ :Jro""'t- '1.1 ..... ,1.1 c.. c.. rT C :J_c..(f)""'t- oQ) c.. ro n. QJ ~ 0 - rT rT :;: < n :J :!J -0 g 0 ~ o. ::::r~d:c..rT3 Q)a'rT:J ro rT <. "'C Q) ~ - (f) ro 0 ~ rT -r<~ Q)rT""'t-T\ ::r CD' ro' a -0 rT =i' ro 3 ~ ~ '" <Q n" ro .c;;; :J. g rT ""'t CT QJ Q) \C C -. ro Q) ::::r QL ro, 3 CT c Q)""'t rT ro'" :J (f) ro Q) =:..0 0 c.. n ~ 10 - ~ c: .:;:t ffi :;: !1! _. rn C ro 0 -. =: ::::r ro ~(j):J Q.~ 3~QJO ::::r'" c.. ro... "'C r1'" \J QJ Q) ~ ~ "'C a 3' ro 3 (f) :J rT ...- 0 < "'C ~ ro .. ~ a. ~ '" n" CD ~ CD :J ::r 0 CD @" CD" ~ S? ~.; ",,' n:J ~ (f) .... ro rT ""'t '1.1 QJ '1.1 ... ~ 3 ...... ni-~ - QJ ~ n;.9 c.. :J ~-< ~ c.. rT!If w N ...... -I ::::r ro G) ::s: o n (f) ::::r Q) CT ro "'C ""'t o < c.: ro c.. :E ;:;: ::::r Q) :J :t> :J :J C Q) ~ "'C o ;:+ :E ::::r -. n ::::r --i ::r } CD (J) ::r o - c.. (f) rt OJ :J c.. OJ } c.. (J) . . Ei ~~~ i~ !t~~~ ~ )> :::c D c )> r- -t -< "0 -. (XI 0 U') 0 o 3 -. @" c -"0 a. ([) ...... E - QJ 1O ::J -. rT ro -< 0 a. ::J -. 3 U') QJ 1O o - "T'I...... ::Jro roa.g. ...... ::J )> 1O U') ro ([) !:!:U') 0"0....... a. ::J -. ::J 'J C 1O ::J ::J - ro n -"0 ([) -< ::::!. !:!:o......x~Q o n ([) n <: ...... ::J QJ <. ~ 0 c QJ30a.a.::J ::J ro c ([) QJ a. a. QJ U') a. -< ro QJ (J) -< (J)...... c ([) U') QJ ...... ............QJ@"::Jro ..cro......rT,...< c (J) .YI ([) ...... roO QJQJnU')(?:E -'::J rT a." ~a.::rQJrorT C ::J ...... ::r 3' ~ QJ ~ QJ ro ~2<;a..~n oQJ~U')QJ~ cB3QJN5.([) n I--'- QJ X 3 U') 0 a....... n ([)rT::JQJa.([) ::J ::r !:!: -< U') ([) rT QJ ::J (J) 0 a. ~ C QJ ::J ([) o ([) ::J ([) a. ..... U') a. U') ..JrT a.rT q-onrQJQJ cr cr a.::'< @" C ro ([) :E U') (j)Q)Q;::r3 r-t" = 0 o ([) U') ([) 1O QJrT~ a.QJ:::t- ~ 5. ro QJ (f) ::J ...... QJ ~::J --i ::::r ..., ro CJ) ::::r o - 0.. "'TI -- ::J 0.. -- ::J . . 1--1 ::J n o 3 '"'C -. OJ ::J n CD o~~(3raq;f @ a. 1O 1O. -g ~ ([) rT 0" 0 ...... ::::!. n "0 ::r ::J ::J rT n -. QJ([)QJQJo;:::~ ::J QJ QJ::J)> U') ::J -n )> -. 0 ..,.., ....... -t'i _. ...... .., ..J ::J([)........c<nQJ 1O~,Qc~8....... QJ 0 C QJ QJ ...... ::J-nQJ==cra a. g. r-i ~ ra ...... <. a. 0 "'< -. 1O ...... a. ([) (J) (f) 3 0" ~ ([) < ([) rT"O ..... _. QJ ([) ..............J ([) oro~OQJ:En =R([)< 0 "OOlOro~QJ"O 3 ;:+ -< 3 a. ::J -< ~~QJro a.o rT"O ::J ::J 0 n -n QJ......a.rTnoU') n 2 ...... 3 QJ 3 QJ. !:!:......([)"OQJ3a. <. QJ QJ - ([)...... !:!: 3@"ro3 ..c...... ::J ([) ro U') rT "0 (J) a. ([) C 0 - O-n::JQJ ...... ::J([)rT=l--trT g.~~~~g ro......ona.rT QJ ::J 0 a. ::r nQJ([)5.!:!:([) ~5.~n:g~ o ;::+ 0 .. -t'i ~ (J) ::J rT O""\::::J ,.... QJ U')::r :f r-t" c" ([) s:: ([) ::J rT )> ~ - "C a. ::r ""\::::J ~a~~ng -. 1O rT rT 0 ,.... (J) ...... ::r QJ lJ rT QJ ro rTc U') 0 QJ3 ::r::J QJ U') U') QJ q- ::J.. 0 0 a. -t'i ;~ ~~~ ;~ !~~~ )> ::u o c )> r- -I -< ::::r 0 S' 3: -., ffi~Qc~ !::!' ,...::J ::J' (f) C5. -. ~ ~ t"b .g. Cl !;lor\::] w~ O:::!c:-VI 3~:::!n::r t"b ~ 0 0 (f)~g~~ !::!: _. ::J... a. (") 9- ~ ~ (t) \::] (f)::r ::J o c: \j -. 0-1'1 ::;r!::!'t"bn iooU -..:. ....., Q- i\:j' Q. ::r n (t)(t):::!')(J)(t) (f)@@"(f) ~(f)-,..,.(t) QjO~ron ~....... (J)"'" ("[j OJ!;l -. :"'I """tt"bgg (t) (f) W ::J I;:::::' ,..,. N (t) -., .. 0 ~::J . {Qt"b::t:,.O '" a... :::: ~ OJa::J--- (f) (t)....... OJ 0::::: \.0 St::::",OO (t)O~N \::]~m'-" '""t ~ _.0 -. ::::r r:::t. ....,., :3 t"b ('[) ,..,. OJ ::J::r ~ Qj~(t) OJ-() 3"""tc:::r t"b ::::;. ::J c OJ ....., -. OJ ::J (f) (it (f) @' ,^ <; _ VI VI oQj::::r,..,. ...,..,~OJw --. :::::: o ::J """""' CJ) CJ) c CD . . ~;;o0 , ro -' c OJ- c,OJ ~~< -" :J (f)" rT rT OJ ;;o~o ro c.. ro c ro < _,ro OJOJ- rT - 0 -. g ~ 3 (f) OJ ro OJrT:J :JrorT c..OJ'"U :J ' '"Uc..O , n o ;;0 ro roc.. , c OJ -" , 3 0 ro (f) :J (f) OJ w . N . ....... ....j"'+" ~ ~ ~i ~ f~ ii~ I!~ !~ "" )> ::u D c )> r- -I -< 38 =r3 nlO 2';0 roa.oQJo(rlroro ~ I'D 3 @ 3 ro Vi'" (J). rT(f)ro 3::J a. ::r ~ - QJ -. ::r cr ro ro _. ro = (f)(f) 0 """'I ::J _ n CrT n ~ q ::J 0" (J) ::r OJ' QJ '-J -. ro ::J ro 0 - """'Iron< 3 C"' n -. < OJ lO (J) OO~"""'I::JOJroo ::J30rna.(J)~~ ::JI'D"""'IcirTrnQJ::r ~3lOro~OJ@"O rTC~~ ::J"""'IrT Q] n -. n a. ::r ~ _::rcOJOJnroOJ (J) -. """'I QJ rT lO (J) ro ::r 0-1'\ -. rT I'D o rT '-"" 0 ~ -. """'I OJ """'I """'I 'LI ::J _ n' C"' 3 ::J ::! lO (J) . @" '< ro QJ' QJ'.. ~ """'IN(J)iJQJrTrT o n -. ::r ro ONQJC"""'IC3 < 0 """'I C"'"'O (J) I'D. C"' -. 0 """'I (J) """'I on=ro"""'l rT..........::Jcca.I'D ::rrT rTrTca. ro -. ::J = OJ n C (J) ro rt ::J -. n ::J ro C -. rT ::J I'D ~Bqrn~lOrT rTroOJn ro::r a.n;:::0-i3ro ro rT -. 3 ::r -. C"' nI'Dro ro~c OJ a.. 3 n -. """'I a. rT" _. ^, 0 ::J ro ::r ::J (J) ~ ::J -, _. OJ 0 ~, 0"""'" (J) ~ ::J rT 0 0 OI'D3ro::J3""""'h~ ~ ~ _. QJ OJ' """"'h ..... 'LI (J) -. 0 ro"""'l(J)3m """'I lO _. (J) rT '< 0 (J)::J (J). o ::JrTro (J)old '< o -. CJ') n c CJ') CJ') -. o ~ . . w . N . ....... :t>;:on ,. ro ::::r e QJ- e ., QJ ~e:< -- ::J -. r-t" CJ) r-t" "'T1QJ ;:Oroo roa. ro ro ., < QJ~ -0 o (f) 3 :J r-t" CJ) QJ ro QJr-t":J ror-t" :J a.QJ-o :J ., -oa.O a ;:0 @ roa. ., e OJ -. ., 3 0 ro CJ) :J CJ) QJ -. 11hii<;;);H,C;SW/:!C'- ~! lin~ ~~!!M~ ~ )> :::0 D c )> r- -I -< (f) or ~ :::tJ m (J) ~~;! ::J Qj (I)' (") :3 -. ::r- 5' V) ('[) ('[) r') (') ~ c:: ?i' VI ~ ::r-m "--. OJ ::J ~$:!::t (I)' Cb " ::J (ti c:r- Q ~ @ ~. ::J '" -'{Q (J) OJ ~ m 1:J 0.. ~ Qjr-t-:::t'I ::J Q1 ~ -. () (') ::J ('[) ::r- -. 0.. ('[) ::J . ('){Q ~OJOJ ,.... ::J c:: <::>0..::::': ~OJ~ ~:g{Q Y-: :::- ........ o ('). ::J ::JQ.lig _. ::J '" @"(ij;..) 3cuc (tl lri tr'OJ ('[) ::J 5' 0.. {Q1:J -~ ::J' ..... O'~ ~ ('[) 0.. OJ r-t- . . (J) "'0 OJ jooooi ,,<,"'O::J (J) 0 "'0 0 t"'Tf) (D (D f) , 3 (J) OJ Cl. (J) ..(J) ::J ~ Cl.DJurt"'T C::J 0 ::::!. Cl. 0 n ::J ~o 1.O 3 :::T 3 :::!'JDJ(J}"'O A ::J(D,,,< OJ (J) 2 :E ::J~Crt (J) (D , :::T "'0 cr (D () ~ C 3 < dCl.~3: ::J ::J' t"'T () (J) 1.O ::J N t"'To ~~~ "'0 .. ~ ffi t"'T t"'T,:::T o - (D ,"< (J) (J) Cl n3@"~ , 1.O ..... -. (D -' -<'(J)(D o ro ::J""'I'I~ (J) t"'T t"'T @" ~ 0 ~Cl.::J '" 0""'1'1 o \LI ::J ~ ' 003 ""'1'1 "'0 r-t"3 :::Tro rn ::J ro r-t" :;;c CD n o 3 3 CD :J a. OJ rt -. o :J . . w . N . I--L )>~n -'(D ::::J C QJ- c.,QJ QJ~< :::s -. r-t CJ) r-t ."QJ ~(DO (D 0.. (D C (D < ..., (D QJQJ- r-t 0 -. o (J) 3 :::Sr-t CJ) QJ (D QJr-t:::s (Dr-t :::s o..QJ-o :::s ..., -00..0 ..., n o ;::0 (D roo.. ., c QJ -. ..., 3 0 (D CJ) ~ CJ) eg I$'~ d!$~~ ; )> :;c D c )> r- -t -< "'On o ::J'" -I:: I:: - arOJ ::J < t"'T -. (J') (J) t"'T -. OJ ::J t"'T::J ::J"'rD ([) ro n~ ::J'" t"'T c: 0 QJ 3 <QJ (J') . ::J . arar QJ ::J . ., ([) (J') OJ QJ . t"'T (J)' or (") t"'T o ~ QJ -. ., ..c I:: OJ :i QJ ::J a. ., ([) a. I:: n ([) OJ -. ., ~ 1--1 LV ~i i~~ (f) . i~ ~f:. (f) N ~ c: . N CD . . n -. t"""t "'U ., o ., OJ 3 (/) cr ., )> -. ., c OJ -. t"""t ., o < CD 3 CD ::} t"""t )> ::0 o C )> r -I -< r-t"11 ::::To QJ - r-t" - o r-t":E ~ :J' ()1O -i~ _. ro (J') n (J') c 0 . 3 ([1 ro :J :J !:to -<:J _. I 30.. "Oro -< ro ro 3 0 ro"O :J 3 !:!:ro :J :J 1O r-t" o . . ro "OQJ QJr-t" . ro !:!:o.. n "0' QJ. QJ . !:!:..o :J c lOQJ ?'-i "0 . o 1O . QJ 3 (J') QJQJon-l g-~o'go "T"'t >< r-t" -. '>oJ n -. -. 3 nr 0 0.. :J "0 o..:Jroc. S' ~ n ffi ~ :;;::Or-t"ro NQJNO- o r-t"......... -. 0 0-' 3 n ~g ~"O QJ r-t"roo..roQJ o-nc3:J -cr~roo.. o . -. :J . :EGror-t"ro ro :J 1O .. ~-. roro"'U<o :J QJ QJ ro :J ror-t":J.QJ .ro'" QJ- 1O 0.. QJ - QJ. -< r-t" 0.. 0 · o 0 """'..0 8 r-t" "0 r-t" C :J::::Tr-t"::::TQJ rororo- ~()o..:t>-i 3 -. 0- n ... "0 ~ -< !:!: r-t" r-t" ...()O::::T -. (J') :J ro o ~ 0 :Jm5ro3:0 QJ :J n r-T :J ro -. QJ "< . -(J') 0..1O -. C 0 ro-<:J.....,., 3 (J)zffi 9 (j)' q 0 -. C (J}QJ<:J- -. r-t" ro QJ gro3St< (J) 1O 0- ro -. . -< ro (J') ... () r-t" ::::'QJQJ N. 00- 00 O:J ... o -. en n c: en en -. o ::J . . w . N . N n -. rt ""'0 ..., o ..., QJ 3 en -n o ..., :t> ..., C QJ rt 1--1 3 ..., o < ro 3 ro :J rt ~i ~rf~ ~~ !tU~ ~ )> :;c D c )> r- -t -< QJ (f) () cr"'O ----' ~rooro'--' a.~3::+offi (6 n""'O ro 3 () ~ ro cu ' 0 --. ci or ~ ~. nr ~ ro n "'T1 ' ro -. ~ :.:_..c ~ ~ n -. C C --. ro!:!:ocuro~ (f)ro,-' . (f) ro --. lC rt o~~-<(f) ~ @. ~ ~ -< ~ -., --. n ,,-","""::rno O-h r ro roO ~ -. ~ a. ,lC"'Cn o ~a-<~ a. (f) lC ,...,. QJ rocuCJ~' ""5.30~ __. C ~ "'U ~. lC cu ro , n ::r f.' -hro-O"^' :::!!ICC-< n. ;;;0 a. ,...,. ro ro ~. ro ,...,. CU ~ (f) (f) ::r , """rororo"'O 3(J)xn' 0"'09-302 a.'cu ro~~3QJ (f) < lC. C 3 g ~~ ~. ~ < 1"'1"-. cr ro "'T1::'< ,..,. C(f);;;o ::r (f)........... m ro (J) ~O'm~O (f)0 _G) (f)a. !:!:~ ro ~ m (f) lC ,...,. ~. 0 n o :J CJ) CD ., < Q) I"""t' -. o :J ""'0 ., o ., Q) 3 QJ~O-., ~o"'OO Q.c!:!:, lC-Oro ,a.~a. ro"'O(f)c cu,,...,.n !:!:.ooro -< c.., __. C ro N 3n3w "'Oro , cu 0 3 o ,...,. < --. < ro- roro,...,.o' ()QJ::r~ ::r~ro"'O C N"'O 0 -ocuc QJ 0 ~ ~ <d'fTa. (f)' - (f) ,...,.romo QJ~<-h (f)'" (f) ro cu"'O~-g _.0 - , - --. - --hC ..c C --. ,...,. c!:!:,...,.cu QJO~~ =~roGr ~,...,. ,'" ::rro,...,. rocu,::r - < ~ ro ro ro ,...,."'0 () VI ::r QJ --. ron~ n ~--. c... VI , (6 QJ (ri ~ ~ (f) """roro "'O~~ - n CU"'O ::r ~ --. ,...,.QJ~ ~lC ,...,. (J) o C I"""t' :J'" OJ Q) ""'0 o ~ CD ., ""'0 - Q) :J I"""t' ~ 3 o < Q) w . N . N n -. 1"'1" ., QJ 3 (f) -n o ., ):> -. ., C QJ 1"'1" ., o < CD 3 CD :J 1"'1" ~ II~~ i~ !tU~ )> AI o c: )> r- -4 -< n:::rQJno QJ QJ ,. QJ < lQ QJ. (J) a-<..c::JroQJ"~ o ro ,,<.,::J..c ::Jcrffio"""""r-I"C:Q.. ro ::J... ....,.,QJro ~~~~~~~g c "'0 cr ., 0 ro n ro:2(/)g.~(/) ~ QJ ::J QJ< :::r :::r o::Jro.........QJro~ro ::J nr :::!) U5 Q.. n \ ... =r Q.. vr... ~ QJ 3 "'0 30 ~ ~ ~ (6 0' ~ 3. rt (/) Q.. ro ., S' ~ r-I" :::r 0 ~ (/) ~. lC ~ ~ g. n. _. ~ QJ n r-I" ",oro~g.=oOro ., """T" ro -. ro N r-I" o ro Q.. ::J cr "'0'" :::r lQ",o~8~~g-~ QJort3QJ3~a- 3....,.,:::r3::JroQJQJ """""c r-I"::J::J::J (/)aa-5~r-I"Q.. N a QJ -. 0 I w<::J~QJ"""'oro ...j::o.O o"g.~ a - O-h "'0 ::J 0 C:., QJlC" ro ~ "'0 ::J ro" ro" (/) gnr~(ri(6~~~ ::J ~ ~ QJ (/). ~ ri: Q.. 5rVl-i~~$20nm n-iO~~"~~ O:::rQ..=QJ.,r-I"n NroQJ- roror-l" "'0 ro nr s' (/) ""'0 (/) QJ ro (/)... n q- ., ::J ., r-I" ., ro 0 -i Q.. """""roror-l":::r ,,<30:>QJr-I"ro"3 ro QJ a(/) (/) n 0 QJr-I" ro'" r-I" "'0 ., ro 0 c: ., . Q.. ::J lC 0 ... :::r < QJ ro r-I" ., r-I" ro :::r ro ro (/) c .., cr QJ ~ (f) ::r QJ 0- m --I .., m m ""'C .., o .., QJ 3 Q..QJ-i ro::J:::r ~. Q.. ro lC::J"'O ::J ro ., QJ <: 0 -<lC r-I"n" ~ 0 QJ ::J ::J 3 QJ (/) r-I"r-I" _. ., VI <C:QJ ron- (/)r-I"(/) ....,.,0"0 Q ::J ~ ~~~ o 3 ::J' ::JOlC roQ..r-I" ~ ro 0 c:::J"'O ., lC ., crr-l"o Q) :::r 3 ::J ro 0 _. r-I" ::J ro ro :::!)::Jro =~::J "'OlCro ., "< ., o lC .......... -. "< ro 3 I ~ "'0 ro (/)QJ=+: . n n' rt -. VI ro o ::J """'Q VI ro ., < ro ro 3 ~ 0 - Q.. ro (/) w . N . N n t"'T ""'0 .., o .., OJ 3 (J) 0' .., )> -. .., c OJ -. t"'T .., o < ro 3 ro :J t"'T ei Ift~ ~~ !~~~ ~ )> ::;0. D c: )> r- -I -< :J "'0 0... -I ro C -. OJCT'(f):J'" '""'I _ "'0 ro ro -. ro (f)n n r-t" 0... :J -. "'Oro~~ C 3 '""'I n CT'OJ OJ 0 ==:Jr-t":J n""r-t"r-t" n ........ :J'" :J' zO'roc G')'""'I""Oro OJ C (J) 0... CT'r-t" (J)" n == 0 "'Oon{J) ro:J:2:ro :J~oro (f):J A ro _. ~"""1'1 '""'I ro (f) C -. :J :J {J)r-t"-<o... ....... n OJ -. U1Z'""'l:J o...lO 3G')r-t"r-t" _. 0 0 _"""1'1 roCOJC (f)ron"'O """1'1 -. n lO a :J 0 '""'I 3lO3OJ {J)30... r-t"@" ro :J"'r-t"OOJ ro -. 0... OOJn (f):Jr-t" O. ro z C r-t"G') r-t"""O:J"'"""1'I :J"'(riroc OJ (J) lO ro OJ ro '""'I -<:JO OJ a. :E ,-< -. ro'" :J OJ r-t" lO . :J'" ro ......... (J) OJ I :J"':J 3ro ::::!:! ro < NC ro- ....... ::+ 0... _. ro ro ro n-n~!""1"~~ m ro Z -. ,n ........... 0 _.- r-t" CT' G') :J ;;0 Q. rn ~~. (J)~~C :J"'<.......CT'ro:J"'{J) :J < :J -< :J OJ :J' O::r:OJU1~~lO on 0...0... '''' lO :J'" ~ :::.!2 r-t" CT' n -< (J) r-t" 0 :J'" ro 0 . :J'" 0" -. ro ro 3 o:J:Jn:J"'O :E'" g -. -. (ri Qgro~~{J) (f)ror-t":J"'o~ rn n ci ~ -a 0... -. :J .." 0 :J'" ~ (J) CT" Z -< _. '" OJ OJ 0... -. r-t" ' '" r-t" r-t" ,(J)"""1'Iroroc oOJro:Jo...Q] lO C ro "'0 -. - ro:Jr-t"c~G') :Jng~oOJ _. :J"'...... C (f) :J _. r-t" r-t" :J C -. :J"'......... ~ lO (J). ~ ro n ~~~2'c3~ _-' :J ........... n ro OJ 0... :J ... o :E CT' (J') n' :J'" 3 z ro Or-t" "'0' d O"QJ:J OJ, cr-t"Q.'""'I 0 (J)coro lO d: ro' """1'1 0... CD o c:J :J n:J"'n ... roro~ro QJ :J:J'Z :J lOr-t"OO 0... _. ro lO :J ' ro >< ro :J )> - r-t' CD ..., :J OJ r-t' -. < CD "'T1 c: CD - < CD ::r -. n - CD (f) "'"''''''''''''''''''''''''';''''' ~ ~i ~r~~ I~ !~!0~~ LV . N . N () -. rt ""'0 "\ o "\ OJ 3 (J) 0' "\ ):> -. "\ c OJ -. rt "\ o < ro 3 ro :J rt )> :;0, o c )> r- -f -< ..,...."....... ,...,,,,,".,.,, " .. ,.,.... "''''''''..'',;",.,.",., lQ 3 OJ ~~~~~ ~ d:~{~):> 5~ (J') ~ ~ c _. ~ CD =.: (J') (J')r-t" =.: CL I-" CD - .. ~ nffi~~ (J') ~"tJ g.o ......... ~ r-t" CD ..00 G)"""-:::r I~(D0n G)o(')~-i ......... r-t" -. (/).. CDo~ (') 3. 8 3 0 g (/) 3 (D 3 ~ O(/). 3 (D Q) O. r-t"r-t"- ~rt" (DQ) (/)30nCL r-t" """I 0 0~3~"tJ Nr-t"OJ~@" 00 ",lO CL ~"""'hCDCD o """I r-t" :?: ~ o-~ffio< CD c """I (D on3"'~ ~ ~. 0 ~. n lO (J') lO -. I-" r-t" 3 \D n. '"0 G) Q) ~~"""Iar-t" < 0 c: (D _ <: 1.0 n (D -. """I '"0 < CL CD. :::r (D (D (J') Q) _ (J') --I ~ !'1 r-t":::r lO o CD CD ~ ~ ~ """I r-t" CL -. (J') g (J') n - -. 3 OJ rt ro n ::J'" OJ ::J ro )> n rt -. o ::J (J) w . N . N n -. r-t .., QJ 3 CJ') """'h o .., ):> -. .., c: QJ -. r-t .., o < ro 3 ro ::J r-t ....."'''..i..'' e! fI~ ~~ !tU~ ~ )> " o c )> r- ~ I--'- .......... 0t/) 6r ==R :::0 m (J) [)~ 8" "t:J a Q.j Cti::J a.2'V):b g a~~ -.j ~ -. (t) 'U - Q''''''cQ.......... Q ':"'I c:r.... B C'[)" N :'1Q... a :::::;. c:: g:. a Q -.j(")",Q) f'1" C'[) . u ::J :::: !:to (") Q CD ~~ ~ (") c.n" () .. Q Q :3 Q c:: :3 3' ~ c::tlJ::::': ::J~1lJ -. 'U t:l ~[')o c.n" ::::J" "0 lQ~@" Cti lQ Q... (t) (t) tlJ ::J :::::: 5~~ c:: ~ 'S: ('[)c.n _. (1) ::J ::J lQlQ':"'I tlJ G) (1) (J) """I (") ('[) 0 0 :3 {5 :3 ~. -. ~ _. ::J ::J Q Q t""\ ::J':"'IQJ- (J) ('[)Cl. Q' Q Q' ""'c ""'c ::J c.n no-i ::J'" -. ::J'" Q) 0 CD ::J X. -. lO c.. lJ CD CD -. )>..........~ nnVl r-t'o::J'" -. Q) ON- ::J..........- VI ;;0 n CD 0 c..~ c -. n ::J r-t'c o'CD ::J r-t' o "U< Q) -. ::JlO ... 0 ma ::J c CD VI ., - lO"< "< 3 ~"'O OJ CD r-t'3 ~ CD "< ::J r-t' Q) -. ::J r-t' c..(J) nn _OJ -. ., 3 cr Q) 0 r-t'::J CD ;0 ro n o 3 3 ro ::J 0.. QJ rt -. o ::J . . LV . N . N n -. r1" -0 .., o .., QJ 3 (f) '"""'h o ., )> .., C QJ -. r1" ......-t 3 ., o < CD 3 ro ::::J r1" I e~ fI~ ~~ ~t~~~ ; )> AI D c )> r- -I -< C:'\J~~ro(l)N (I) '::"I 'oJ 'u (i) ('[) .......... ('[)o-'3@''$:(J) ~~~8.g~@' "CbQ:~!Q3~ ~ (l) (I) -J ('[) ~. ~ II? ::J "'. III III (I) (t) ~ r.!" ro r ,... (I) ::J 7 .;:::j v, ~ ......, c: Q ~1lI1lI\jrara~ Vi' ~ ::J ~ ('[) (I) -.::: ('[) I.Q a.. a.. ::J ~ (5 0 -- d tr- ':'t tr- ::J- -, ..... III -.::: S '" c: ~. 2$" -...j ::J '" v, 'u ~. () .,^ ~ s: s' ffi 9; ::r- ~ \J I () :::rn~::J~t:"'I- (t) Q.j III Vi Qj I.Q ::::::.: 0 '1:J O':'t (l) tr- Vi .;::- ,.... ~, Vi -- ~ v ...... ::J c: "'. (l) Qj ':'t (l) 1.Q::J':'t(l)::Jo~ ~ a..~ ?5 @- 3 c- a.. 9" c: I~ ~ g '1:J o ~......., ....... (t) ~. -- ~ """::::t\ Q ~ CD 'u 0 III (l) ~'""" tr- ~ -, ;::;:- @' 1lI(I)~a..::J~:::::: Q: @'~. ('[)::i (l) Q~::J~~IlIa.. ::J o' rn (l) (") Q: ~. S:~Vi~g~~ d "'. ~""" Vi :::h fD C:1lI('[)('[)q~3 ~5.~~~~~ o ('[) """ ~. -. '<::: ~ C:::JIII (,[)Qa-Qj r-t-(')V')::J::J-,!:!; !:t. Q ~ ~ III C5.: Q -J c: ' U ::J ::J ('[)Q]~QQ..~\J 8 I.Q 3:g :3 ::r- 5J ~ ('[) ('[) Q ~. ::J ~ ~ ::J -, ~. Q Vi 3::J-fir2"Q('[)::::t\ r:.: ('[)"'.::J -, r:.: 0 ::J ~. (1)-' ~, C!" ('[) ~ ~ ('[). "'.::J- . (I) (l) (J) or ~ ;0 (t) (J) ~g:~~ <. (ri Q ~ ()(/),,::r ro ::r -. ro o t5 n a. -. (/) ~~ @"on ::J c: 0 a.~ c: Q) (/) ::J a. ::r n, r1" OJ ",- ::r Q) Q) (/) r1" a. ro r1" ~cB3' c: 0 - -a 0 a. (/) 0 ::E ro -a (/) ~ d: c: rog-a OJ (/) ::E (/)3';:;: OJ ., ::r ::Ja.g: OJ ro CD -a < n -a (/) _. a ::J' ~ -a lQ (/) .. :::!. Q) ~::Jn CD Q) 3 3 ., Q) CD ..c r-t" OJ C CD (/) OJ n c:-::r ::::!. ~ Q) ::J ::J lQ lQ ro ;0 ro n o 3 3 ro ::J a. QJ r-t' -. o ::J . . LV . N . N n r-t '1J .., o .., OJ 3 (J) ""'1'\ o .., )> .., c OJ .., o < CD 3 m :J r-t ~ I!~~ i~ !tM~ ~ )> :;u D c )> r- -t -< .."H^."^. .MM.' p...',,"',";;"'.'".''' ....'."'''''''';;''';;;;;'''';';';'';';'''''.''- ~ a.. n .. 0'" QI N no O-TIQJ,. -'<' ~ ~ ~ 8 )> '" - :J '" :2: )> -i ::J'" QI _. 3 3 ::J'" :E 0 o....c QJ c ::J'" ro QlCDE= oo~:Enroc@"gro ro::+ i1. ::: II> :;; 3 C ;+ '" :J' 0 '" ' 0 n CD d: 0 n: ::J QI .... .,... ::J r1'" 0 :::::!. -. ' ,.... '" 0 ...." r-I" r-I" ..... QI ~ r1'" ,.,."" -TI ~ < ::J II> !:!! 0 ii < .. -. '" -. '< '< , ~ II> 0 =I! _ _ II> ~;;)!!+- '" 0 o ::J _ '" n 0 ^: -. - :J. ,..,. ::r 3 nr-l"...."n c:::J.... ::Jcn::J"'QJ . _. C ~ ' on C" <0 '" ,..,. '" ,..,."" ::J ::J '" '" = ,..,. "" ::r :S. ...." a.. c.. '101 r-I" r-i lC -. < (f) QJ ro o _. ::J CD ~ ,0 -. < ::J .... ::J""" r-I".... 0 ::J r1'" < <:: ro' 3on~ n3a- ::r",:J <: ~ II> =: .g: -0 ~ ~ Q, '" ~ ffi '" ..0 O' ::J" II> ",::T ?" ,..,. .....::;: = fir ffi ::J Q. '" n. U! '" ::T N '" '< ' '" '" '" ,"",-0 n -i""""'''' 0"'" st i=i= 8" :<: CD r-i ::J'" ::;. ....... ro , (J)' QJ '" '" _. r:!- '" '" 00 ' 0 ,..,. :J O QI ~ n::J <' QI OJ):> < ' 0.. < '""' 0... cr 3 C -. n' _. VI - CD ::J 0.. iQ. 11>. 0 C '" Q. !!t =: 0 ,..,. '" ,..,. a. ,_' Q.' ........-:J::r '" _. QI rT' _. ""'0 -. "'< ~ 0 r1'" O-TI nO'"'""' ::J - n ., ....... < Iri _. _ on II> ,..,. ,..,. ::r :J. ~ , -. = 0 ::J (J)... 0 0.. ,.,. ro ro ro Q.'""" ",::J ,<' CD ~ nCD 8" ::J' ,QJ ro'" (f) QJ r1'" ",_' ",n<"'''' n 0 _. 0 QI QI lC l:J On ro ::J ::J ::J'" ;jJ , iQ. on )> ,..,. _ "'2 .,.... CD .... roO 3 0 0.. 0 l:J ::J'" " . "-' CD (J) l:J ~ -. ' ro 00.... n QI 33"roo n ~. 0 II> _ '" ::r <0 ~. n 30 ~ ~ -g 8 ::J"'8..~ Oro 0 ~.!:t nr::J'" n co ^, r1'" ~ n !"""" 3Q.' -'<' ~ _iif_biO '" C::J - Ii a. o,<C '" ;::. ~ 5 t!1. '" 9' ro :s: ;:j. !!J II> <; ,,::J 8:"'@c'< <; r-I"@'lC' O-TI (J) ::J <:: CD n c: ro r1'" -. < a- =: ~ g '" ro '" .g. ~ r-I"d: c.. st (J)n::J ro iif Vi 0 9' '" a. '" , .... ro ~ ....... --i :J'" ..., CD (f) :J'" o - Q.. (f) r-t' OJ :J Q.. OJ ..., Q.. (f) o ro < ro o l:J ro , n' ro Q) < QJ -. QJ cr -. .!:t . . i~ t$,~ i~ !~~~~ ~. -I m " "<:E..........CJ (I) CJ (j') 0 OJI""T~I""T ~~)>::J'" 0.. .......... g. (I) ::J'" (I) 3~O CJrol""T ::J _. CJ o..::J"< O'~~ """"I Q OJ I""TI""TOj ::J'"(I)""""I (I) 0.. !-"-g.q NCJ~ I I""T::::!. I""Tn !-"-::J'"I""T co (I)""""" 3 ~ ~ 0<:< ::J=,:r-1 I""T-~ ::J'"CTCJ "'0 (I) ::J (I) OJ 0.. ::::!. CT (j') 8..ro:E ... I""T ro CJ 0 (I) 5.~~ --t'\roOJ OI""TOj """"I """"I I""T())> ::J'"::J'" (I) C C -I""T ::JOJ::J'" ~ ~ Q VI -. ;or~ < vi" (I) -i ::::r ..., CD (f) ::::r o - a. " -. ::J a. -. ::J Ei ~r~.I~. m~!!U~ ~ . . ~ -I m :;0 ~ ~ () o 3 '"0 - -. OJ ~ n ro ""'0 """"I o < (/) -. o :J o -1'\ ~ Q.J t"'T C'D """"I (/) C "'0 "'0 "< a. c """"I -. :J lQ Q.J n Q.I t"'T Q.I (J) t"'T """"I o "'0 ::::r n C'D 3 CD """"I lQ ro :J Q 1--1 (J) (J) c: ro . . LV . N . N :E OJ r1" ro ., (j) c e! fI~ ;<;~I!U~ ~ ~ -4 m ::;c ~ 3 ~. ~ OOJ (D-QJrT ~ ~ c:r -< ::r QJroro~o ., ::J IlJ QJ ....,., (J) (') c:r rT rT c:r -< '" (D ::r (D . 'L.I., (D QJ~S03 < QJ (j)' IlJ QJ ~ 3 rT \--0. _. 'L.I ro ::::!. 0 QJ ro (') ., c:rQJrTrT~ ro ~ rTQJ OJ ., ::r ::J rT C3' ro (D a. (D ., ..c ~ rT ., ~ c: QJ ::r a. QJ =to rT ro (i)" rT (D ro (f) q- ro (J) ., <: n' ., rT 0.< rT n ::r ro ~ (J) 0~3~(J) 3 IlJ <: (D -0 ~ ::J QJ :2 QJ a. @'" -. ::J (D (J) ., ::J -< 3 -. \C (') (D ::J )> rT c: ., (') c: ::r (J) \C QJ g:. (D S~(J)on ...J ro ., -. 3Qo.!:t~ ~(J)"""'''' 0 (J) c: IlJ ., ....,., ."'tJnron -0 Q) -0 ::r -<6TQc: o ~ rT QJ ....,., ., rT c: 0 ~ < -o-g.rT~ rT -. rT IlJ o (') ::r'" (D rT -< ::r (D o -. fJ) n c fJ) fJ) -. o ::J . . LV . N . N m 3 CD ..., ~ QJ r-t CD ..., (f) c ~ Ei ~~~ ;~ !tU~ ~ -I m :;0. n CI \:J (J) {I) (J) -I ;U w ~! IJ~ aac:~ :E ::r c: ~ (A (t) 6r CD . ~~ !~ ro OJ ~ ~ (j)' c: (1) r"'t CD n . ~ ",....,.(1)""'" ~ r"'t G) 0 N (t) tlJ ~ :E ~ 3 ~ ::J tlJ ::0 OJ tlJ,....,.::J,....,. r"'t 0 ,....,.~Q..(t) ('[) CD n 3 (1) .., (J) .., ..,;:;.::3:t:. )> () CD 0 :t:.:::t'tlJc: a c: :J ::J c: s: 5' s: r"'t ::r r"'t 0.. S:Cb@"a ::J 0 :J OJ a -. .., (J) .., c: ..,::J;:::;: ('[) r"'t ro r1" ~('[) " -< -. . (t) . . r"'t 0 -'<():3tlJ OJ 0 . a ::J ~ :3 (t) ::J :J (J) :3':1Q.. Q..c: . . QJ ~ (t) ~ 0 r"'t-a rt ::r -a CD ::J::J@" ro 0 .., Q..CI" .., ;+ (f) ClJ" !::!:~~ :E r"'t c: -t ::r a ClJ tlJ CJ ro r"'t m ::J,....,.""'" ro (f) Cb (1) .., 0 a .., .., ro r"'t ::;0 """,,(J)CJ OJ ,....,. c: -. 3 -< :::t' \:J (J) ro ~ Cb l::J S" .., - ('). lO QJ (J)" ,....,. CD r"'t ClJ ::J C") :J ro ::J (t) 0 (') .., I CJ(t)::J -< 0 -. Q.. ,....,. -a (f) I Cb (J) -. 0 r"'t ~ ::J .., , a c: -. I Cb () () i -. r"'t ; S- ro i (J) OJ :J Q.. :E (f) ;::r:8" ::::r, :J' 3 n:E ~~ ro ~ :J lC =n -.0 :J :E CD (f) CD , Q) :J :J lC Q.. VI < aT 0 :J c: Q..3 ~ ro Q..VI (f) Q.. c: :::!. :J lC r"'t" ::::r ro , ro "'0 o ~ :J lC "0 ro , -. o Q.. :E ro , ro " ",' HH"" .,., ""'" ,.' ~,.n" ,M'''",,'''''''''''''''''''''''''''':-'+<<,GiT.!Yi1C1Y1\' -i :J'" ..., CD CJ) :J'" o - 0- "'T1 -. :J a. -. :J . . 1--1 ::J n o 3 "'0 - -. QJ ::J n ro VI r"'t" o , 3 Q.. , Q) -. :J ~ VI (if 3 ~ r"'t" :J o c: Q..Q) ro'< r"'t" ro ' , ro 3 <. -. ro ~ :E r"'t" vt::::r ro Q)"'O 0: CD , .:ia' , 8" 3 3 ~ CD n ro CD r"'t" 0 r"'t" -t\ ::::rr"'t" ~::::r ro lC n o _. ?'~ VI'" N I--'- -Im(f) ::::r:Jr"'t" ro lC. Q G) :J 3 :s: ~ O:::!. ~ n:Jr"'t" VI lC ro ::::rVl' OJ aT =n :J 0 Q..:E OJ VI , Q) Q..:J VI Q.. < o c: 3 ro VI VI ::::r Q) :J o r"'t" CD X n ro CD Q.. n .!i -i :J'" ..., CD CJ) :J'" o - a. (f) r-t' QJ :J 0- QJ ..., 0- CJ) . . e! @I~ d!tM~ ; c AJ. )> Z )> G) m """"""""H"""'""" '""'~"""~ idiiLid,'FL001+0ii0SELi''' OJ Cl. OJ " """""' w ~~J~ "'0 ([) lC 0 CJ) . "'0 < (D ..., CJ) 0"1 ~~!~ ..., ([) ::J n 0 n c: . ~ "'0 0 -. :::r I--L ..., "'0 (D OJ ro OJ VI ::J 3: OJ ::J . . r-T n 0- ([) n ([) ([) OJ ([) (D C3' VI -. ::J "'0 ..., r-T :J <. r-T ([) :::r rt OJ ..., 0- OJ ro 3 r-T 0 ([) :J ::J OJ ..., (D OJ 3 n ::J ..c (D :::r r-T c: :J ::J OJ (D n ::J ::J ..., C r-T ([) ro OJ ::J OJ (D ::J "'0 0 "'0 n ([) ::u ([) 3 (D ..., -h ..., 3 3 OJ n m )> ::J OJ r-T X r-T ::J VI VI r-T -. ([) 0- ....,., (j') . ..., ::J ([) 0 rt Z OJ 3 -. ::J n :J n 0 (D )> ([) ::J Cl. ::J "'0 c: < 0 ..., n G) 0 ..., """'I r-T 0 n (D ::J OJ ([) Cl. 3 -. m Cl. ... :J c: ([) OJ ..., r-T ::J ([) VI r-T VI OJ OJ ::J ::J (1) ..., Cl. n ([) (D VI 0 VI 0 0- VI C (j') OJ ..., rt r-T n OJ ~ ([) ro ::J 3 r-T 0 ro ::J < -. ...... o ::J 3 ro ::J r-t" OJ (J)" (J) - OJ -."'0 (J) ro r-t" -. ...... -. 3 3 3 "'0 -. "PoGr 8@"cr ::J ::J ...... (J) r-t" c: 0- 3 ro -. n ...... ::J OJ ro \.C c: ...c OJ (J) c: ::J ro (11 Q. 0 3 n 0- roO@" ::J (J) -. r-t"!:!:.::J (J) "< ::J -tI "'0 \.C ...... ...... 00"'0 3 @ ~ Q.(J)3 _. (J) -tI .... ;:;: (D'OJ(J) (11 ::J cr ::J Q. ...... r-t" ::J n :::J'" (J) OJ o ::J 3 ::J ro ro OJ 0--1 (rl ro :::J'" OJ ~ ro n ro (") @~~ "'0 OJ n @"o-c: 0- Vi' ~ ro :::J'" ro ro ::J gQ.!:!:. r-t""< (110"'0 (J) Q. OJ o ro ;::+ c: < -. ...... '" n n ~ "'0' ro 0 OJ n OJ "'0 r-t" :::J"'\.C n ro OJro:::J"'(J) ::J ::J OJ ::J n ::J ro _. ::J ro ::J OJ 3 (J) ro ...... OJ OJ ro ::J' ::J 3 \.C. Q.OJo r-t" -'::J ~QJ'~OJ OJ n ro ::J ::J ~ n r-t" OJ 0 ro OJ ::J ...... -tI@"n7\ ...... ro\.C 00"'0...... 3 0- ...... 0 r-t" 0 c: ~ OJ. n "'0 '101 ::J ro (J) _. Q. r-t" o::Jc::J'" c:1O......OJ ...... ro r-t" @ (J):::J'" r-t"OJ :::J"'(J) OJ r-t" ...... n ro OJ (J) (J) o ro c: (J) ...... ... n ro OJ \.C ro ::J n ro (J) . r-t" :::J'" ro ...... ro 3 OJ "< 0- ro n o ::J ::!) -. n r-t" ::J \.C 3 OJ OJ\.C ro ::J ::J @" O. ::J ro OJ ~ ::J n -I ro :::J'" o -. (f) (') C (f) (f) -. o :J . . w . '" . ......... 3: OJ -. :J r-t CD :J OJ :J () CD o -n m X -. (f) r-t' -. :J o .., OJ -. :J OJ (f) r-t CD 3 es fI% i~ !!~~~ "" c. ::;c )> Z )> G) m S>8"fti~fti:-i (J) U1 n 3: ~ ;0 w ~i 114; QJtT1-=:::::::.:(")::t r-t 0 or , QJ ::J'" ~~ !~ _ CD' Cl (1) (1) CD ~ ro . ~ t:) ~ :::::- -. AJ -. CD (J) QJ !:!: ~ ~ :t:. :;::t\ -s:: ~ 3 ~ r-tn n . ::r- ~ ([) ....(1) (1) (l) c CD -. 0 ...... ~ Cl Cl\O -. CD ~~ (1) ::::t-o ~ QJ (f) O' :AJ ~ 3 -. U1 QJ :s: \:)o::r-a.@'::J ~ ~ U1 cu ""'t (1) CU (t) lC r-t n ::J'" OJ 0 3 \:) -. or - (J') CD 0 -. ~5.~g:39 QJ :E :E~ :J .... c:::-, (1) "'0 0 ro r1" QJ (f) :3 (f) ::J QJ 0 , , 0 :::J ro 0 "",n ::J 0' -. @' n- ::J :::J n :E "" 0 a. :J t:+_Vi::J CD lC ~ OJ Cl::J S. C) 0 !:t (J') U1 _. , r-t QJ r-t 0 -. :J g: S' \0 0 """':3:: (t) U1 ::J'" C ~ rt (l)~G):3~cu 0' CD "'0 C -. n C . . ~ CD 0 ro :::!) ::r- c:: :3 \j S. , < (J') r-t :::J ::J (l) -. -. \:) ~ o _. c 0 0 ~. cuG)~~O(1) ~ a g-"'O . . -t, - c:: 0' ~ ::J QJ ~ 0 QJ )> 1:1 -. QJ QJ m (1) c::t. ::J ~ ~ ::J -. 3 ' ~~Cl o@ ~. CD 3 !:!: X ~ ~ 3 o. -. _. !11 (i1' ~ :3 ~ -. "'0 (f) Z CD @" ::+ QJ r1" !:!t:)~::r-AJo _CDr-t -. ~ :t:. CT" cu ~ * ~ , CD CD :J )> <. CD ... G)~~a.g~ , U1 QJ ~ 0 0 U1 r-t 0 G) c:: ~. 0 ~ _. _ a: ~....OJ c:: C r-t ::J'" 3 , ::J'" CD "\ ~ :::::: ::J' QJ )::. \j n OJ CD CD CD m M- \0 :3 (') V) ~ ~ -. 8" ~ :3 (1).... a c:: r-t QJ lC :J QJlC , lC OJ N- ::J S. (f) !11 CT" -CD 0 0' ::r- .... (") c (1)~Q8:T1~ "'0 ~ "'0 ~ CD n U1" QJ o c::-. , CD ~ $. 8 51 ~ :3 3 U1 n n *~:3!:t~~ rt 0 ::J'" U1 ~ ~ QJ ~cu~~Clrn . (J') (f) ~ c ~ r1" o ::J(f) ::r- rt CD ro c:: (if QJ QJ 3 ~ (f) ~ r-t ::J G) (D ro ro ::J a.(D r-t" """"I o QJ Cf' -. ro 3 2'-g ::J () a.r-t" ro (J) 0.0 Cf'::J "< c.. r-t" ro ::::r< ro ro nO _. ""0 ~ro c.. QJ """"I ro Q) (J) -. ::J ~ ro (J) r-t" ro """"I ::J n ::::r c: Q) < (J)" fiT 3 Q) "< 1--1 fJ) fJ) c ro . . ~ it'D ~!iJ j~ i~ ~~ '" LV " ):>0) n" nN O"'T1 3 c: 3~ o -. Q..:J QJ r-t' roO' Ul) I "'T1 -<c: ror-t' QJ c: ..., ..., G)ro ..., "'T1 o QJ :E n. r-t' - ::rrt -. "'T1ro o (J) "";::0 ~ ro QJ (f) c: r-t' -. ..., ro Q.. c ~ Z )> G) m r-t' o ("') ...c -n"'C o cOO ~ 3' -. --I 3 Q) ., r-t" (J) 3::J'" "'C =: r-t" ro c "'C "'C ro =:~::J"'::J~Q)"" Q) ro r-t" _. ("') 0 CD ::J <: n,' ("') r-t" < ("') ::::. n ~ -. U'I ro 3 ro g.rio-TI~ 03 Q) <: _. "'<; r-t" ::J '" "< <: ::J (J)'" ., 'II _. --t'I at a. ::J ::J g.~zo("')~vro r-t" () -c 0 =: ro ::J r-t" ::J"'CDOa.r-t"-"'cr ro <' m ::J' ro' 0 CD ro S' (f) lC U'I -g a. U'I 3:lC"'C'" Q) a. ro c S ., --t'I ::J a. ~ _. ~ 0 0 a. Q) -. n' ("') Q) lC ., - ~ ::J -. "'C. r-t" ~ ("') 0 n, r-t" ro ro....o.,.....::J"'::J Q).,3 =--t'lU'lror-t" -c (J)... Q) c 3 --t'I '" Q) _."'C ::J n, --I c , II ::J r-t" U'I a. ..... ro ::J "a.("')roU'l"<roa. 3. () g 0 ("') ::J lC (J) ...r-t"., --t'I 0 ro ., ::J . '" ro 0.("') c ro Q) X Q) -; 0 a. a."'C r-t" "'C @" ro -; r-t"::J'" ::J'" o U'la~onCD U'lQ)ca.(J)crQ)o _. ("') r-t" ro c ro ::J ~ ~ 0 _. a. rt ....,., "< -n ::J ::J n -. c 0 r-t" g. 0; 3' 3: ::J ::J ::J 0 ro!:!. -cQ)a.OJ:::!) nO~'" ::J ~Q)::J _. ::J _. Q) -. ~. ~ ~~3::J~~?n r-t" '" a. -; CD O ::J ' II ro r-t" r"'\ o ::J 0' Q) ::J'" UJ Q) "'C::Jr-t"-;U'lCDro= CD loro~n~r-t" ::J ....,., -; -. -; ::J'" Q) ~o ~Q)ro r-t" (J) ro' ~ 0" (J) ro::J -; . o -. (J) n c: (J) (J) -. o ::J . . ~ ~i ~r~~ ~~ !~U~~ ~ w . )>0"1 RN 011 3 C 3~ o -. c..::::J OJ rt """'h m 0 111) -<~ m rt QJ c: ) ) G)m ) 11 o QJ :E n. rt== :::::rrt -. 11m o fJ) (ri~ n ~ C rt -. ) m c.. c :;0. )> Z )> G) m rt o ~;! (t) (t) ::J aO (t)' . (f)~ 8"8 QJ ::J ,... !::!" ..... ::J' \Cc:: :3 (t) (t) (f) ~8" Q"t/) @ ffi -~ 2'~ ::J S @-~ . ::J \C ~ o :3 (f) fir @" tlJ ::J ~ Q ..., CD' ~ QJ - (J) or ~ ::0 ('[) (J) Q ::J (J) ('[) . . III "'0 --I :J ., ::r Cl. CD ., __"'0 0 o QJ C ., ., I.C 3~::r ~ 8' 0 o -t'\ n < c III CD :J .. 3 Cl. (f) CD III r-T :J :J QJ Eii '< rtr 8'~QJ CD 0 :J X. q ..e: (J') 1'\. 0 r-T ..... ., -. - :J (f) -t'I I.C III CD Cl.(f)Cl. ., (f) CD III 0 ., -. n QJ :J -. QJ III I.C r-T 3 CD CD 0 """",Cl.:J QJ ~ -. n -. (f)CD =.: r-T ~ ::r" CD n r-T (f) 0 ::r . :J CD (J) r-T() ., -. R~ r-T o"~ :J 0 o C -t'\ - :J Cl. ~ g ;:c ro (') o 3 3 ro ::J Q.. OJ rt -. o ::J . . ):>W n" nO'\ O. 3N 3~ o :J a. a. OJ -. r-t':J CD U10' I .., -< CD "'T1 OJ C .., r-t' G)~ .., CD O"'T1 :E OJ r-t'n ::::r -. ~ II~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ -. "'T1 r-t' o -. .., CD CD (J) n;::;tJ OJ ro (J) r-t' c :;0 )> Z )> G) m c .., CD a. r-t' o n-o 0.......-1 -. OJ "'::r ~"""'Ico([) ~ ^,:::::!. 0 If) OJ ::J 0 r"'t -onlC"""'I~ OJ """'I r"'t ([) ([) """'I ([) ::r If) If) ^' OJ ([) -. OJlC-o ~5 ::J ([) ([) ::J 0.. CI..OJ"""'Ir"'t ;;0 ~ o' ~ ~ ([) n 0.. OJ OJ n 0 c If) 5- ~ ::J ::J r"'t OJ OJ If) 0..0 """'I crlf)([)-t\CI.. Or"'t"""'l~ ::J ([) """'I cb ~ "7'~~o.Q ...;:" -. U1 C QJ :E ([) '--" :;. If) ;:::;: :E ([) @"::r",CJ"'([)1f) """'I r"'t r"'t r"'t::rO::r -o::r([)CQJ OJ([)-tlq,r"'t ::J~~::tg -g =.: ([) ([) If)..-t;CI.."""'I O ([) ([) ,^ ::::..c -t\ OJ' <: If) <: C D1' r"'t ;:::;: U). n([)::r;:::;: -. 0.. OJ ([) ..-t;:E-o-o ([) _. -0 OJ If) r"'t """'I """'I ::rO^, 0.. ::J' ~ OJ CD r"'t -. ::J ~::r~CI.. '"""'I'j([)([)--' ([) """'I -t\ W CI..([) OJ OJ ...... ~ n. n -' .... = """'I r"'t([) r"'t If). ([). If) ::r r"'t ([) ([) If) -0 .::: ([) """'I ." Do) o -. - -. .... -. CD tJ) . . r Do) ~ Q. . . :x=- n r"'t c: QJ w U'1 1.0 QJ n """'I CD f./) "'0 ([) """'I ....... "' o o o """'I ([) If) -. 0.. ro ::J r"'t (J) CD QJ (J) r"'t o """'tI ........ I 00 o U'1 --i ::r ..., ro CJ) ::r o - a. "'T1 -. :J a. -. :J . . 1--1 :::J n o 3 ""'0 - -. OJ :::J n CD -I :::J'" """'I ro ro QJ n ., ro f./) o """'tI ::J 1"'1" ro roO \.0' f./) :::J'" f./) 0- :::J"'O QJ 3- 0-0 ro 8- "'0 QJ ., ::J ~ 0.. CI..n ro 0 0..3 "'0 3 ro c: """'I ::J ~ o QJ """'tI "'0 ........ "'0 I """'I 000 0"'0 U'1 ., . QJ' 1"'1" ro @' n ....... "' o o "'0 OQJ """'I """'I 2S: rn QJ a.::J ro a. ~ :E f./) ;::;.: CD :::J'" QJ f./) 1"'1" --i ::r ..., ro CJ) ::r o - a. (f) rt OJ :J a. OJ ..., a. CJ) . . Ei ~~~ ~~ !~~~ ~ -c )> ;;tJ " en Qo ;;tJ m o ;;tJ m )> -I - o z . Z ro ro a. cr ...,. rooo.....--i ~ ~ rn ::J'" Q) Q) c: ro ::::JnrtG) a.. ro -. ro ro (I) ::::J ::::J a..ooro .-r-t\<..... ~::::JroQ) roro..... () (I):ENij ::J'" 00 Q) ::::r 0"0'" ::::J OJ a.. Q) 00 -. ..... ::::J:J _. ^ 0 a.. lC (I) (I) - ::::J . 1"1'\ ::::J -t\ ro @ \.... roo<.-r ro.....<ro a. ~\ (f) ro ::::J ro .-r a..ro(l)::J'" .-r :E c.: Q) o :::ro.-r 3 ..... ::::J ::::J ro .-r ro o !:!!. (I) :E ::::Ja..0" ;::;: ro -< a.. o ::::J 0" ro ......-r,....< .-r(l).....ro ::J'":E~0 Q)ro ,"0 :,"(1)03 .-r~ro 0.... ::::J -t\.-r.-r ~:!.:E oo(l)ro 0<(1) U1<.-r .... =0 .-r.....-t\ ::J'"ro~ c:..o ' (l)C:00 ... _.0 Q).....U1 ::::J ro o :E < = ro - ..... a.. w ro Q) < n ~..... o ro "0(1) 3"0 ro ro ::::J ..... .-r ~ ro ... Q)o (1)0 .-r0 o ..... -t\ro ~!:!!. I a.. OOro O::::J U1 .-r (I) ro Q) (I) .-r o -t\ ~ , 00 o U1 ... . iJ)' a- ro ::::J \C ~ ::::J ro :E . m >< c.r/ r-t" -. :J lC ~ ::::r ...,. ro (J') ::::r o a. (j') r-t" OJ :J a. OJ ...,. a. :E ::J'" n" ::J'" 3 ro .-r '.......,.,'",,,,,.........."",,.....;.,.,,....'<,,.. . />'><<i'i>">!'/i:++>h 0 tlI-j I--t Ei I!~ -. Cl.::J'" (f) LV (f) Cl.ro (f) . i~ ~~ n ...... "'-J ro ""'0 c: ~ c: (J) tlI . (f) (J) ...... CD N :J ~ (f) ro . 0 -. :E S20 -i 0 -C ~ lC ~ ::::J ...... " )> o 0 0 n ro :E ...... r-t"ro CJ) AJ ::J"'tlI ::::J ... r-t" -. 0 " n 0 - -. :J a. ~g en (f) -. ...... Cl.ro r-t" ro (J) OJ Qo ::J'" 0 :::J Cl. a. AJ (J) OJ @" " :J a. m Cl. n (1 QJ ...... ::::J Cl. OJ AJ (J) ::J'" :::J 0 m c: CD Cl. )> 0- m -I n ::J'" - tlI 0 :::::J lC CD Z Cl. r-t" 0 I r-t"~n :::rr-t"O~~m ~ (j)' 3 00 r-t" X ro;;;tJ o ~ -. ~::JroLnO~ n g g. ~ 8" c: .i 0 _~o 0...... lC 0. (/) . 3 QJ r-t""O ::J 0- n q.. QJ QJ -. "" QJ ::J ...J "'., r-t' '" = ro ro' ro '" -. ::J-<~<~" 0 g CD' 0. ro c: ~ ::J I QJ ro QJ ::J -. n(/)< 0.00 o r:::f ro n. ::J' ~ -n 3 roo~\C ro m "0 "O~::J~ >< QJ' 8" 3 c.: ~ 0 (i)' ::J n ro ro ro ~ r-t' r-t" QJ ::J ., (/) ~ -. -t'I _ !""'" ,... (/) I .... 0- ~QJoo- ., ~ _. ., 0 lC 3Q O'"<Ln QJ QJ ~ 8" (/). ti .;!n wnn.... --... _. 0 c: - -< ~ QJ::J" a. ro ~ Q (/) (6 ;:;: QJ _. ro r-t"::J -. ...... 0. (/) 2 r-t" 0 (/) ro n - ::J r-t" "0 "0 r-t"-< OQJ ~~: c.n 8 ~ ......."-1....... ~ 3 (/) "OQJ Ln ro ,ro~ 8~q ~ --ti ro ., d: ro n roO(/) ::J" (/):J g ill c.: QJ 16 _. r-t" ro QJ ., ::J o' ::J n ....... 0. ::J !if ., , ro roO ~r-t" r-t"(/)O ::J' ~ :::r < 0 -. "" QJ < r-t" '" r-t" ro ., ro (/) < (/) ro -:::r < (/) -< 0 0 r-t" -. . _ ,.... 0 0. 0. =-~ro 0. ::J ::J !if rt . o -n """"" I ex> o U1 . . ""'0 -, o "'0 o c.n ro a. Z ro ::E ~ }> roo. (/) 0 r-t""O or-t" ~QJ ~ I "0 000 0= Lnn 0--< rog c: QJ (/) r-t" ~(6 ""'0 o.g 0 ~ (6' 9' ~ ~ --..... rt:::r :::rQJ -. r-t" ::J r-t""O :::rQJ QJ ., r-t"'" QJ~ ., c: ro ::J QJo. ::J' \C 0' ., ::J ro ~ Q. ro < ro o "0 3 ro ::J r-t" . \C W ., o QJ ~ n r-t"" :::rro (/) ~"O ro ro (/) ., r-t" 0": ~O ~o 10 00 o ::: Ln::J ro ~ ""'0 -, o "'0 o c.n ro a. -I :::r -, ro c.n :::r ::: 0 (6 a. (/) c.:(f) ro r-t' ::J QJ !if ::J , a. .i ~ ~ a. 0.:(") ,ro :::r ., QJ ro ::J 8 lC \C ro ::J N' ::J' lC ::J ro ~ w . -......J . N -I :::r ..., CD (J) :::r o - a. (f) r-t' QJ :J a. QJ ..., a. n :::r QJ :J CD ~! Ift% I~ !~~~ ." )> :;0 ~ en Qo :;0 m o :;0 m )> -I - o z O'n-; .,QJI ::J(J')m (t)"""1'IZ :E 0 ~ ., QJ "'O(J')c... QJ c: 0 + 0-"'0 n(J')r-I" (J') (t) QJ .D QJ ::J c: ., c...(t)(D ., ::J <. (t)r-I"(J') n QJ (t) .,c...c... (t)0"U ~"'O QJ _. r-I" ., o -. ;::;- ::J g (J') croQJ n """1'1 ::J =QJc... ~(J');;O (t)r-I"(t) (J') ., n QJ ., -. r-I" (t) ::J (D QJ r-I" I.C r-I" :::J -. -. (DnO """1'I::J :E -. (t)ffi3: (J') ::J QJ r-I"n(J') . r-I" -. (t) ::J ., ~"U 3 QJ "'O::J - r-I" (t)::J'" 3 QJ (t)r-I" ~8 QJ ::J ~r-I" o QJ. ::J ::J "'O(J') -0 QJ ., ::J n ~ QJ"""1'I "'0 r-I" -. :::J af(t) ., n QJ -. ~~ o :E 0= """1'1- "'O(t) QJ < ., (t) ;::;-., (J') 3 :E QJ (D;::;- ~(D o (J') """1'Iq" ~c.: '(t) ~(J') lJ1 r-I" ~. 0 :E QJ ., c... (J') ::J n ., (D QJ (J') ::J I.C ;:;: (J') o < (t) ., QJ - "'0 (t) ., ~ """1'1 ::J (t) :E "'0 QJ ., ;::;- (J') QJ ., (t) r-I" o 0- (D "'0 ., o < c... (D c... ::J (J') -< ::J n :E ;:;: :::J r-I" :::J (J') I.C ., o :E r-I" :::J ~ . o ~ """1'1 """1'1 ~ "'0 I QJ 00., 0;::;- lJ1(J') ~ . 0' ., ::J (t) :E I.C ., o :E r-I" :::J (J') r-I" o 0- (t) QJ n n o 3 3 o c... QJ r-I" (D c... QJ "'0 "'0 ., o "'0 :::::!. QJ r-I" (D -< :E (t) (J') r-I" (f) o c: r-t' -. o ::J w . "-J . N --i :J"" ..., ro (J) :J"" o - 0- (f) r-t' OJ ::J 0- OJ ..., 0- n :J"" OJ ::J ro ~i ~r~.~. i~ ~!M~ ~ -c )> :::c ". en go :::c m o :::c m )> ..... - o z ~ I (J) f-Io ;::c ~i i~~ ....... ......... w ~~ !~ "-- @" ro . ~ , "0 r-t- )> -.....J (J) ([) QJ ::J'" (f) n (f) , . or ~ -. * ([) "0 0 N ~ c.. (f)QJ 3 AJ ~QJ5;:+ 8 m r-t-::Jc..o 3 -i -0 (f)c.. ....,., :J t/) ....,., ... (J) :::r )> e O:Er-t-r-t- ro .., , QJ::J'" ro ~ Q ::Jrt::J([) :::) (f) ;;0 ([)::J"'c..-I Q. ~. ::J :E QJ QJ 0 :::r '''0 OJ 0 " St t/) c.. "0 c.. I rt - m ([) ~ (f) r-t- c.. en \J < 0 ::J'" 9 -. . . 0 d ([) "0 0 \JJ :::) (f) \J o :::::!. C 0 t""t' Qo ~ "OQJc..:::J: . . OJ r-t- 3 (1) CT' 0 ::J Q. ([) ....,., ([) 3 c.. ;;0 ::J QJ tlJ r-t-nQJ' OJ :3 -. 3 ([) .., m n= < (t) -. !:!: ([) ([) . c.. :J ~(1)::J:E n 0 ~ :E ...(f) c..... o.:(f)([)r-t- :::r Q. ([)::J"'c..::J'" OJ ;;0 OJ . QJ r-t- ([) ::J ~ - 0 m :J ~- '"U \Q CT"QJ ~ ([) ([) , ro )> QJ 7' \Q "0 c..(f) , . . $20 -I !b 0 < ::::;;0 - -. -I 0 C-::J"'CD ([) , n c..([)(rl Z "OCDQJ ([)QJ!:!: , n 0 f-Io,::J ... CD O(f) 00 0....,., ~ ac::t. (f) @" S:~ - ~. ~ -. ::::: 0- Q "'" -. ::J a- s: (t) ~ tlJ (J) -. a- -. ~ tlJ ::J Q 1::J Q1 (') Q" ("). Q.j - ~ o ~ a- (t) -. ~ tlJ a- rc a- (J) @" ==R ::tJ ('[) (f) Q ::J (f) ('[) . . N '-'" o "'C )> """"'QJ I--I""""I() ::J A -. fir(J)~ """"I Cl. "'C (I) ro 0 r"t"< Q)ro== r"t" _ ("') roO-< 00 "'C (I) oro::; U'1Cl.O cr:EC:: ro;:;:Cl. Cl.::;cr ro """'" ro < c:: QJ ro::JCl. - Cl. o -. 0 "'C::J"'C ro 1O fir Cl.=rCl. :Eor"t" ;:;:3::; ::; QJ -. ::J r"t" ::J ro """"I r"t"<ro ::;<..c (I)' """"I c:: ro -. Q) (I) """"I """"I -. ro ro Cl. (I) Q)ror"t" . ::J::; C!:Q) CJr"t" 1OQ) """"I - o ::J :E ro r"t":E ::; :E ro (/) r"t" ;c CD n o 3 3 CD :J 0.. OJ rt -. o :J . . LV . -......J . tv --I :::::r ..., ro en :::::r o - a. (J) or ::J a. OJ ..., a. () :::::r OJ ::J ro ~ bi ~~~ ij~ !t~~~ ~ -0 )> ::tJ. ". en Qo ::tJ m o ::tJ m )> -t - o z r-t" <; -I .......-t LV ~! iJ~ :::r . CD U'I :::r (f) '-J i~ ~~ r-t" CD (f) ::J OJ """"I . ~ CD ... CD C LV CD OJ U'I ro 0- ::J -. "'1J U'I 0- OJ . . :J , C3' C3' ::J ~~ -0 """"I """"I m m ro -. )> ::J !lJ 0- 0. m n C3' (f) -. ~ ..c rt :J :;a C """"I ro """"I """"I , CD !lJ :J " U'I ::J 0- "'1J o.:lCI 0- nOJ CD OJ d: en ::J 0 :::J"" r-t" ::J ::J c:^ OJ 0- OJ -OJ Qo - OJ "'0 ::J """"I OJ :J 0 0- m <0. "'0 n :;a c """'1'1 """"I -. C CD (f) ;;0 !lJ ::J !lJ rt ro m d: 0- d: OJ 0 ::J 0 n 0 ::J lCI ::J , . OJ ro C3' or OJ :;a """"I rt n -. n - 0 m 0 -. :J ::J d: )> U'I CD r-t" U'I " """"I OJ -4 c ::J n n d: ~ - 0 m -. 0 ::J CJ} rt r-t" -. r-t" CD ro Z 0 """"I (f) 3 ::J CD n CD :::r r-t" c !lJ 8 ~ g:~ 5-g 2'0'-; CD ~ ""1 0... ., r-I" n :::r CD 0... "'<; '" or- c: c: CD n (J) 0... -. ",I '" ., ~ CD ~ 2 ~ CD ~ ::J CD ::J 3 (J) cr. ::J ::E 0... fir '< ::E 0 -. N ..... (J)CD 0... ., '" ::J ~ '" '-' ::J ~. \~ (J) \~ \~ ~ ~ (J) ~. -5 ~ r-I" (J) 0... 0- \~ n ..... "'0 CD ~ III ~ n' 3 (J)~ 0... '< 3 CJ'" ::J ...... ~ _. - 0... 0... III n o' -n ~ n '< n < lC :::r ::J ,..,. r-I"~~ ~~ ~; 0 cl' ~1lI ~~ IlIQ <::J * ~~0...@-~8~~~ (J)~~.,IlI::J.....",::J q III -........... ::J q 1? 0... 0... ~Q ~8 5}o ~ CD;;o ~::J 3(J)CD"'<~ CD' CJ'" ro 3 ~ 0... o...~ ~ ro (J) CD n c: III III "'<; III ., ::J CJ'" ::J r-I" III CD -. 0... 0... ::J 0" 0...0... ~ ~ CD (J) CD ::J .. -1'1" < ro g ::J Q 0... ro ~ 9!.. CD. "'0 ~ .g CD lCIlICD3 0...::J:::r.,- CD CJ'" '" 0 CD ~ ~ 0 ..(J) "Q. ~ (J) 3- III ::J ::J . 0 ::J lC 0... "'TI 0 0..."'0 <' c: 0... 0... III r-I" .. ., 0... c: III CD '" c::" < (J) IlICD~CDo ., O::J '< CD c: "'0 n ., III ., CJ'" ::J ::J CD III lC 0"'~::J",o o 0 "'0 III ., ::J III ., III ., '" _",(J) (J) 0 .......... -n ::J n c: 0... CD c.. ro (f) < r-I" CD ., o ~ "'0 CD -. lC ::J _. lC CD (J) 0' ., ::E CD 3: (J) III r-I" (J) CD r-I" ., CD ::J ., n :::r c: III < Vi' r-I" OJ ""0 III ::J 0... o n c: 3 ro ::J r-I" ::J n c: 0... CD (J) III o -. (J) n c CJ) CJ) -. o :J . . LV . '-J . LV -. ""'C :J , ~~ ro -. Q. (J) _. (ti:J , :J""'C nOJ :::J"" c^ -OJ OJ :J <Q. -. (J);;;tJ rtro OJ n , ro OJ rt -. o :J "'Tl Q) n -. -. rt -. ro (J) ~ i~P ~~ .~~. ~~ If? ~ 1J )> :;0 " en Qo :;c m o :;c m )> -f - o z ::J::J-.J ft)ft)'=i ~ ~ ft) 3g.~ OQJQj ?t \:) ~ --rtre:: (J)..,1j ~o~ Q..::J~ \:)(1:) ~QJ8" \S* dQ::J: QJ ft) ft) C')::::::-:::t1 :::r-(i5Qj ~ ~ a- - ::J' QJ ::J ~Q.. (J)AJ rtrft) :-, 9 ::) (1:) QJ Qo- ...... c" e:: ::J OJ $:~ (i)' (J) @"rtr .., ::J::1J QJQj """'::J QJ Q.. 5' g:C') rtic: ~Q ffi ffi QJ ._~-~.__.__.._- -.-. (J) fir ~ :::tJ ('[) C/) Q ::J C/) ('[) . . OJ ::J Cl. CJ "0 OJ ::J cr """"I CJ OJ ::J Cl. n Cl. (D .Q OJ < c (D (f)' 5. 0 n: -TI "0 o OJ ::J ::J n, (D OJ = :E ::J~3 Cl.::J ....,.., (D 0 C (D Cl. ::J Cl. (D Cl. (f) (f) ::J ..... CJ lD -' ::J oCl.Cl. ....,.., CD CJ -<"0 OJ (D "0 ::J 0 """"I Cl."O 0 OJ CD OJ ::JCl.g. Cl. :E (D -TI (D (f) OJ (J} -h n no 0 =: (D """"I no """"I -. ::J 3 ~ CD n(D ::rcr C ::J OJlO < (f) no OJ ... """"I -f (D ::r Q (D ffi n no -. o"~ ::J (f) CJ ::r CJ ;:0 ro n o 3 3 ro :::J a. OJ rt -. o :::J . . w . '-J . W ~."U } ~~ ro -. 0- r.n _. (if::} } ::}"U nQJ ::::r} c^ -QJ QJ ::} <0- -. r.n ;tJ r-tro QJ n } ro QJ r-t -. o ::} "'T1 QJ n -. rt -. ro r.n ~! II!~ I~ ~n0~~ -c )> :;a " C/) QO :;a m o :;a m )> -4 - o z C .....-t LV ~~~~ "'0 (J) . I~ ~~ c.. '-J OJ (J) . nr c: ~ c.. CD "'U . . ""C 0) OJ \J ., Gf .., ^ )> 0) en ~ c.. OJ ;;a ~ :J a. " n ., ;;::c en CD 0) ro ,....,. -. n 0 Qo. ~ .., ro 3: OJ 0) r-1" ;;a (J') -. nr 0 m ., :J "'U 3: 0 OJ ~ OJ ;;a -. en (J') r-1" (J) ro m ,....,. -. .., - )> ~ ""C - n OJ -I 0 3 :J - "'0 0 CD ,....,. CD Z . ;;;0 QJ "'0 --I roCl.-::r nCl.QJro , , ::J ro ro (J) G) Q) (J) r-t" "7 !:!:{J)::r..:::.. o ro Q) 0 ::JCl.r-t"n 3: QJ (J) r-t" CD , ::J Q) , Cl.ro ~ Cl...c CD ' C (J) rn ro r-t" (J) (J) CD r-t" "U,::r{J) Q) ::J 0 r-t" ::Jn~~ ~2'o QJ r-t" "'0 C"'O <' 0 _. ro , (J) "'0 r-t" fiT Q) C ... ,::J. ::J ~~ n QJ r-t" C ::J 0 Cl.Cl., ~ ~ ~. r-t"Cl.CD ::rat~ ro n C C = "'0 -. Cl. R~Q) Q) ::J nr nrroCl. Cl.~{J) "U{J)r-t" QJ 5- """"I ~ _. ^_ro (J) (J) QJ 0- Q) ::J CD ::J Cl. Cl. -_.^.,._--~ ,.--- "'0 "U --I CD Q) ::r ~ ::J ro o "'0 Cl. ::J 0 0 (J) n cr (=1" C , "'< 3 ::J "'0 ro ro ro ::J ~ @- 3" (rl ::J. Q) (J) ::J ::J a: (Q fiT CD r-t" ::J ~ 0 (J) -. "'0 Q) , n Cl.~g{J) ro -. sa. n < Cl; (J) C ro ::J nr ~ o(Q::Jro "'0 W n ::J 3QJ"'<!:!. ron~"'< ::J , _. Q) r-t"ror-t"Cl.' ... (J)::r Cl. ro Q. 0 r-t" , < ~--too::rCDro ~"'OCD~~ -. QJ ro ::J ro ~*~(Q Cl. "', Q) - 0- ..... 0- ro "'< ~ (J)' ~ ro ::r - (Q "'0 ro n Q) ~ Cl. 0 1-LC)3 ... CD 3 o ::J CD oro::J o'r-t" Q) (J) -.---...------....-. ,..__...._~,,-"_.._-~._---~-~--_._-._-.._- "U"U)> Q) QJ ::J , ^::J::J (J)::rr-t" QJ Q) ro ::J (J) , ::J Cl.o-Q) ;;;o~Cl. ro ::J ' n QJ , n --too ill 0 r-t"- !:!:3~ o "'0 r-t" ::J ro ::r ~nrCD Q) Cl. C =RQ)"'O ::J Cl. Cl.~ ::rro Q) r-t" (J) 0 o-r-t" ro ::r ro CD ::J "U QJ , ^ (J) Q) ::J Cl. ;;;0 ro n , ro QJ r-t: o (J) :J fiT:s: =RQ) . (J) r-t" ro , o -. (f) n c: (f) (f) -. o ::::s . . w . " . ~ ""C QJ .., ^ (f) QJ :=J a. ;;0 CD n .., CD QJ r1" o :=J 3: QJ (f) r1" CD .., ""C QJ :=J e!i$1~ i~ ~tb~ ~ ." )> ;:c ". en Qo ;:c m o ;:c m )> -4 - o z ~;! (f) QJ 3 :r> ;U w ~i iJ~ ::J ~, Cb or ::J QJ a. . ~~ i!~ OJ c a. ...... ro '-J ~ CJ-~ ~ Q) ro QJ n . (j)tl.i Q) ;::f:I 0 ~ ;::J:I ...... < 0 ;tJ ro 3 C::tJ <, Q) ....,., -. \J tl.i m ro Q) t"'1" -C s:~ :::r 3 OJ CJ') :E o-ro CbG3 , )> n CD c ro ^ ~~ Q '< (3'"0 (f) n ...... a. ::J ::;0 a 0.. ::J ro QJ Q.. OJ ...... @" ("):::0 CJ') ro OJ ::J ". OJ Cb m < a. 0.. ro' rt V) 9 . . "'U -. en V) re :E QJ 0 ;;0 ...... m 8~ 0- 7\ ::J 0' '< CJ) n Qo . . ::J ::J t"'1" QJ , ~~ :::r ::J m ro a. OJ ::;0 OJ OJ G1;A:1 r-t 1.1) -. \:Jrtr 3: ro 0 m 5-'" oQ ::J (")ro 0 :::::-~ QJ 3: (') . cu QJ d: Q..::J (J) 0 OJ ;;C QJ<:::: "0 ::J (f) ;::J:I\:3 Q) 3: r-t m CJ-@- ;:+ QJ m 0 CJ) , )> Cbrtr ....,., t"'1" 8 ;::;.: ro \J ...... - -I :3~ CJ) "'U OJ Cb- ::J QJ ::J - V)CJ- ro ::J 0 !lJ (1) X I""'t (f) ~ :3 "....., :::r Z N QJ ~OJ 0 CJ-~ 00- ~ ~ro -I ::r ..., ro (f) ::r o - Q.. ." -. ::::J Q.. -. ::::J . . I-f :::J n o 3 "'0 OJ' :::J n ([) -I ::r ..., ro (f) ::r o - Q.. (f) rt OJ ::::J Q.. OJ ..., Q.. n (J') aJro3m ~ < ro 3 U'J~Cl;ro ,.........3""""" @ ~ -.....I-ro ro...........c:::J aJ 3 ::J n (J'J rt "< c :::J' (J') , (rl c (J') ro Cl.rT:J"'(J') aJrn~"8 :::J _. - ::J ::J ::J (rl ~ C 00 (J') .. aJ 0 "'0 i::::J "<~o, ........... 0 :::J a . ,......... Cl. "'0 nrTro ~ 0 :::!. ,n"< roQJro .. ::J =...c rT (J') C (J') rT -. ro :J'" "'0 ~,"'O _. a ro ncCl. ro lO QJ rT:J"'::J agCl. Q"'rT(J') rorT@" <:J"'-n ~ ro CD' _. n ,.... -n -. ........ roO ~ :::::!) Cl.<' .........c:::;ro a rt OJ -too:J"':::J rT :::J' Cl. :J'" ro ~ j);i ~r~~ . ~~ ~tM~ '" " - ::a m """- m 3: m ::a G) m z o -< 3: m c - o :t> r- en m ~ - o m '''''''''''-1 ro)>::::r <. r ro ro r.n :E"-"'"'TJ QJ ~ (ri ~ ro "T1 a.nQJ QJ 0 n 3 -. "'C = "'C "'C d: , - (D o ro (f) ~@"3: =--erOJ C (f) rTrT ro ::::r, OJ ""0 (ii OJ ~ ~ o OJ rT~ era. (D )> ro a. ~ < erOJ , ~ o n C ro lJ:::Ir ::::r -. rTiir rT o r.n nC _. "'C ~"'C o n' o rT C r.n ~ rT n C _. a. - "< C3' , to----! CJ) CJ) C ro . . w . \D . N (f):!J c: ..., CD orii ..., n rt (f)rt rt -. c: CD Q.(J) 3: OJ (J) rt CD ..., "1J OJ :J OJ :J Q. )> Q. < OJ :J n CD r -. nr ee U!1~ ~~ 1~0!~ '" 'TI - :::c m """- m 3: m :::c G) m z (") -< 3: m c - (") :t> .... en m :::c < - (") m (f) QJ "'0 QJ m 0 ::J , n X OJ a. s. n (f) -. a. rT ro 0 d: (f) a.=rn 3::J n (rl ro [if 3 lC c: ~ c (f) 0 Q;' (f) ro ::J C a. n (f) a. n OJ -. < :::T I""'"t' == -- ::J~ CDd: 0 . QJ -t! ro rT (f). (f) 0 (f) ::J =rr"TrT'" .. ro "'< =r ro (f) "TI3ro@@" =to 0 OJ (f) ~ CD < OJ rT -. '" ~ CD ::J "TI "I ~ a. lC QJ3'C3lCQJ n, , :E~o~ ~~::S:~ro (f) a. OJ =r..c "7 (f) C ~ rT 3' -. QJ-Iro,"'O ~CD=r~rT3 ro \J =r ro """"I OJ ro ::J \J3::J rT -"'0" ~ 3 ~OJcxQJ . n,rT-< rTCT~ o OJ -. ::J ~::J<o rT ro rT =r n-< CT (f) 0 CD ro """"I OJ a.CD'(f) ro (f) (f) C < "'0 ~ =B CD ro n o n. 3 CD' "'O:::!'!OJ..... 3 n o' ;=;. CD\J'rT ::J OJ 0 rT::J w . \D . N (f)'TJ c: ., CD "T1 o OJ ., n r-t (f)r-t r-t -. c: CD a.(f) 3: OJ (f) r-t CD ., "'t1 OJ :J OJ :J a. ):> a. < OJ :J () CD r -. -;, CD Ei I!~'ik ~~ I~~~ ~ ." - ;:a m ....... m s: m ;:a G) m z o -< s: m c - o )> .... en m ;:a < - o m ~ -. CJ ::::::..:3('[):;! --1:J\j ('[) ~ CD III ~33rl.~ ""'t ('[) ct) ........::J('[) CJ-6r::J2;1 1lI!::!"........tj (j O' ~ ~ ~::J::::~ 8'~CJ-:S: N-~('[)1lI ::j-~-.::::(J) (1)ct)C5@' c:;)~ ~ ""'t 3:' -.:\) a ::J QJ (") :;! ~ ::J 1lI('[)~::r- ::J)1Q:QJ "" :::t.-..J.(J) (J)ct)g:.CJ- \C. r-. (1) ::J '-' Cb ('[) _. {g (') ::J ~QJ~8 ~ 3rl. :s: 3 ....,. III 1:J Q..('[)::J~ '"" ::J III \U \U ....,.~ @' ~QJ('[)Q .....::J ""'t . .g Q. 8' :-i 30Q..::r: Cb~CbCb ~~~JJ ~ at ...... (ti ::J.g III ~1lI ('[) ::J ""'t t/) or ==R ::0 ('1) C/) Q =:3 C/) ('1) . . (j}'C (J)-I (J) "'C :::r:::r cnOCD CD 0 C CJ)3-"'T1 0.. -. ,-' , CD :J cr ro QJ lC CD "'T1 r-t"G)crQJ CD ,n 0..3:0= o C -. g nlC ~ """'t\_:::r(J) C . r-t" r-t"CDr-t"3: C <. 0 QJ (riCDn~ :;E -. CD ~n~' 0"< n""O :;EnoCT r-t"CDc:J :::r(J):J nonQJ QJ -. :J :Jg.:::;;o.. crQJo)> CDr-t"'o.. QJ :::!) (rl < , < QJ 0.. CD _. :J o..QJCDn (ri :J :;E CD ~o..QJc roCD:J(D' 0..30.. . CDQJV> , n c lC r-t" "'C CD -''''C ::Joo n :J , "< 0.. r-t" ,eV> CD,r-t" -. C (J):Jo.. "'ClC,,< Or-t" :J:::r (J) CD CD ;0 CD n o 3 3 CD :J c.. OJ rt -. o :J . . w . \.D . N V>" -. c: .., ro o ~ ;:+n -. v>;:;: r-t' -. c: ro Q.(f) 3: OJ (f) r-t' ro .., ""'0 - OJ ::J OJ ::J Q. )> Q. < OJ ::J n ro r -. nr ~ Ifl~ ~~ !~M~ ~ -n - :;c m ..... m s: m :;c G') m z o -< s: m c - o )> r- en m ~ - o m a.o---I V'J' CD :T "'0 ::J CD QJ CD 1""'\ t"T 1O U J nQ)3: :Tt"TO V'J -. "< < (j (J') CD or "< V'J 3 Q) n . =R g CD n n CD t"T. CD ::J a. CD 0- a. "< t"T o :T c: Q) t"Tt"T ~ 3 c: CD . CD n d: ::J ::J 1O 1O (jt"T :T:T c: CD Q) g. <;~ (J') V'J t"T :T Q) 0 V'J" a. CD V'J 3 t"T CD Q) . ::J lOa. CD Q) ::J · n a. "< :E -~.._-_.._.,._~-....,._..- ~--- ~-- --- -- --- --- -------"-- -- --" 1--1 CJ) CJ) c: CD . . w . \.D . N o c: r"t" (J) o c: """"'i n :J OJ r"t" n ::r (f) (J) r"t" ro 3 r"t" o (f) OJ :J o -. ro o ~ii ~r~~ i5~ 1~~0!~ ~ ." - ::tI m ....... m s: m ::tI G) m z (") -< s: m c - (") )> r en m ::tI < - (") m c.. (J) -u OJ rT n ::::J n CD ~ rT ro ...... (J) n (J) rT OJ c: OJ =-u ~~-u c.. 0 ~ I (J) c..O~ ::::J:ErT QJ ro 0 (J) < (J) crroQJ ro ......... < ro rT ro ~ ::::J 3 c..ro =to G) 0 CD 3: ~ ~ 0-< -< n OJ OJ cr ~ ~roc.. ~ roO 3' rT<-U ro CD ...... c..(J)O crrT< -< ::::J ro rT OJ ...... ::::JrTro ro 3 .{g Clmg ~ !:!: (J) ~ CD ::::J lQ OJ < ~ lQ cr (f) ro -. ro ~ ~ @ ::::J3: QJ OJ ~ ...... c..n ro ::::J c..N ~8 c.. ...00 (J) ~ -u ...... OJ ro R"QJ ::::J~ ro c.. CA 3 ro c.. n OJ ~ (f) QJ ~ c.. q(J) CD-U lQ QJ o rT ... n ::::J n QJ OJ ~ OJ !:!:~(J) rT 3 OJ O-t\ ::::Jro~ ~ (J) ~ ...... ::::JrT39 !if ...... 0 CD C o ffi ro ~ QJ :Eg-3::;< ~_CD::::J c........OJ(J) ~rT@" ~ (J) ::::J n QJ -< < ro o -. en n c en en -. o :J . . w . \.D . N o c: r-t' (J) o c: ., n -. ::J o -. (J) OJ r-t' n ::J" (f) (J) r-t' ro 3 r-t' o en OJ ::J o -. ro o ~! 1111~ i~ !tU~ ." - ::a m ........ m 3: m ::a G) m z (") -< 3: m c - (") )> r- en m ~ - (") m aV1:-i _1lI:::r: c: ::J 0)' ~~~ () ~ @" Qj 0 ::J CJ ~ Q- 0)' ::::: ("J) \j Q- III III ("J) ::Jr:-t- IlIQ2' ..;::-.-J:"'t r\:j ::r:::i ('[) III (j) . Q..CI)::r <3'g-~ """t("J)r:-t- (") ::J 0 o 3(')St \:Jc("J) ~~ ~ (j)' CD ~ oora ::JQ..C) \:Jill'" C:::J~ -a Q.. (j) ~ ("J) ::J ("J)::JSt U) 0 "" . c: 'u ~~ Qj @ ::J --~ -~ - :::t'Io' ~ ::J ~8" ~ ('). ("J) --.-.---- (J) @" ~ :::0 ([) C/) Q ::J C/) ([) . . n --I QJ ::r (j)CD cr"T! """"I """"I CD ~ n :2 ~ -. CD n """'tI CD (J) QJ ::r ;::pQJ CD = """"I """'tI r-I"C ::r""""l CD ~. r-I"(J) """"I ::r QJ r-I" :J ::r (J) -. CD r-I" o"G) :J 3: r-I"O o n ~:E :J r-I" o::r -. Q.. CD QJ lC r-I" o QJ Q..O (J)' :J 'U """"I Q.J ro r-I" (J) n-o ?"o :J (J) CD QJ :J Q.. ;0 CD n o 3 3 CD :::J Q. 0) rt -. o :::J . . w . \D . N o c: t""t CJ) o c: ., n -. ::J o -. CJ) QJ t""t n ~ (f) CJ) t""t ro 3 t""t o (f) QJ ::J o -. ro o ~i fl% ;~ !~~~~ -n - :tJ m ...... m 3: m :tJ C) m z o -< 3: m c - o )> r- en m :tJ < - o m ~ [ 0 r-t' 0 n --I -i Ei i ~~ ::J'" ..J::>. (j)' ([) (j)' ::J'" ::J'" i~ I !'f" w N ....... r-t' r-t' s::::: ([) ::J'" . . . :::!. """I """I ~ r-t' 0 m )> )> n OJ n' OJ n ..., 0 r-t' < 0- 3 r-t' 0- r-t' <; :i ro (J) r-t' ::J'" OJ ~ ,..-., ::J'" ([) 0 """I :i (f) (J) 0 (f) s::::: ~ r-t' ([) """I OJ s::::: ([) c: OJ ....... ::J'" n """I d: r-t' :J "0 g I n ([) r-t' m 0 :i 0 0 (5' (f) ::J'" ([) 0 ([) < :J OJ ....... (J) OJ 0 3 s::::: - 0- n '-" C. OJ OJ 0 n (J) n ... ([) OJ :J :J ....... (J) s::::: ::J'" c.. r-t' ....... 0 """I 0 0 :E :J < s::::: """I """I 3 ;::;: r-t' (j)' (f) 0- ([) s::::: OJ G) :J :J 3 ::J'" r-t' 3: 0- c.. 0- :J c.. ~ OJ r"'1" r-t' 0 OJ QJ -, OJ (J) 0 """I :J """I n c.. (f) en n 3 lO ([) OJ c.. OJ ....... n ::J'" ::J OJ n "0 c.. r-t' N ::J'" OJ OJ OJ """I ([) I C. d: OJ ([) ....... 0 (1 :J (J) 0 0 c.. r-t' n (J) r-t' 00 OJ QJ :J ([) ~ (J) ::J'" :J (J) c.. r-t' ([) 3 0 :J ..., J: r-t' ;::;: ::J'" s::::: ::J'" lO :J 0- 0 (J) c. ([) ([) """I 0 ([) :J r-t' OJ """I """I OJ 0 :E 0- ([) r-t' n' -< (f) 0 0 < :E n ::J'" r-t' . . (J) OJ r-t' s::::: 0 OJ 0- ,..-., "0 r-t' ::J'" (J) (J) n """I """I OJ ([) :E fir """I 0 0 n' 0- :J c.. ([) < <, !if :J c.. n m c.. OJ 0 lO OJ (f) 0... ~ ~ """I OJ (J) 0 ([) r- ([) n :J r-t' r-t' 0- c.. OJ '-" ::J'" (J) n 0 r-t' 3 n :J OJ ([) en """I """I ([) c.. :J ([) 0 ~ "0 c.. 3 :J c.. r-t' """I """I 0 .9, @' ~ d: ([) (f) 0 :J ..0 :E n ([) Q, ([) s::::: s::::: 0 0 n n: 0... ([) ([) n 3 r-t' :J ([) ([) (J) OJ :3 Q.. ([) lO r-t' ~ (J) lO OJ VI s::::: :J OJ n """I :J r-t' :J ([) 0 ([) ::J'" n" :E :E ([) """I 0 OJ r-t' < c: 0 r-t' @' ::J'" OJ ([) n . s::::: :J c.. --I OJ 0 (J) d: ::J'" d: :J r-t' ([) 0 """I ([) (f) n (J) :J n !if 0 ::J'" ....... 0 0 t""I" .. ::::rro ro...c -< c ~ :::;" _. ro Cl.. OJ o t""I" ::::r (J) n ::::r CTt""I"O ro 0 0 n OJ Cl.. o n ::J n U;. (J) 0 t""I" c::r 3 .. . n. c 3 t""I" P. 0 (J) ro Cl.. ::J Cl..OJCl.. ~ (if n" ::::r lQ OJ ro .. (if ::J 0 t""I" --t"I ~ ::::r c t""I" OJ ::J::::rt""l" Cl.. -" OJ :5. ::J Cl.. lQg.Cl.; _. ro t""I" (J) -. o OJ ::J ::J < ro OJ OJ >< _. t""I" OJ:j)Clr CT < n. ro ro r:;: -< -. ro ro OJ (J) ~ ~ ... -. QJ CT ::J ro Cl.. t""I" ::::r OJ t""I" n o 3 3 CD :::J r-t' . . ~ ::::T .., CD (f) ::::T o - a. "'T1 -. :::J a. -. :::J . . (f)n C< Im (f)(f) 00 1--1 1--1 :J :J nn o 0 3 3 "'0"'0 -- -- -- QJ QJ :J :J n n CD CD ~8 ~~~ ~~ !~~~ ; en o ~ o o r- en ~~~nn o..O(f)00::t>N<3 1..0 ::J 3 n 0 < "'U n cr(l) Q)oroo' C:::::J ~ ro q-"O 3 0"\ ~ o...g _. ro C ro 0 ro Q) = ::J n r-t"O (f). · 0 _. r-t ro C "0 0.. ::J (f) < ::J Q) o' (f) ro ro N' ;::;.: _. n n ::J 0 ...,., ::J. Q) 0" ~ c..c... If) 0 ::J' r-t::J OJ 0.. ~. cr ::t> · lQ n o' 3:roiiJC:QJ'QQJ~::JO ,.... I 0.. r-t"O Q) r-t Q) Q) "0 ........ =" (ii'"O 0.. On ::J Q) 0.. _ · ro -. 0.. (f) rogn~~(f)-<~-~ If)"O g r-t Q) '-J 3 ro 3' lQ n "'T'" (f) - I "0 X -. ro :::::J ....... ::J cr ....... -. -. r-t o lQ' 2" ~ -< N ~ ~ ~ ~. 0:::::Jno..3:::::J (f) = :--If)r-tro Q)In::J o' 0.. a: (f) -. C ro Q) n I lQ.<- :::::J::JCNn:::::J'<o 80::JoOlf)~n~ ..._ ::J d: 0 3 n r-t 0 r-t -00"0 :::::J-::J:::::J n"'UN" -0-< (f) ro .0 ro Or-t :::::JO ........r-to · C"O .......r-tro _::J C q Q) 0 0 _. 0..""-'" r-t n (I) (f),...-..,(f)o..I:::::Jd:r-t < ;::;.:"0 "0 ro lQ' ro 0 ~. (I)'o'd 0 (f):::::Jro::J r-t OJ ::J (D' (I). lQ' If) Q) ro r-t Ond:::Jn~=J::O I I""I"OQJ:::::J on lQ'"O ro ::J ::J 0 ~. ri- 0 ..........o..ro,...oQ.(I)::J oJ 0 '-'" Q. ........ - ro r-t If) (D'. r-t ~ ....... < g 3' n n --i 0 = w ::=:. C :::::Jr-t:::::J(I)-,-",r-tr-tro o (f) ro r-t ":::::J ::r o ...... Q) - ro _ oJ (f) · . . _. r-t ::r r-t ro ro . . <;::t> -lQ Q) . lQQ) roo.. .......ro ....... '-J ~~ ;::;.:N :::::J _. n ::J Q) r-t3 :::::J"O ro C ::J (f) ro -. X (I) r-t "0 ...,.,- -. Q) rB 5 -<ro roo.. Q) .0' ~ . o OJ -< 61 ::J n ::r (f) ~ CD CD r-t ~ Q) r-t CD ..., C :J -" o :J I -" ::J"" (f) n ::J"" o o o -. en r-t ..., -" n r-t Es II~~ i~ !~U~ ~ en o ~ o o r- en . ("') ., o ~ 3 -. ~ ..~ ::J n ro 3 o-ro ro ~ ro 0 ::J """'tI ("') (fJ ~ ~ "'C "'C ro fa r-t''''C ~OJ . ., OJ r-t' -. o ::J .. ., o Q) a. :::r Q) < ro OJ :E (J) "'C ----I -. ro 0 ----, ("') ~ ~ ~ o n" 0 0 3 ro ::J Vi' 2'3@'o!:t ::J ro n """'tI n' Cl.;::Jr-i::fr-t' ::J ("') '" . ro :::r lQ ro ",I Q) _. (J) ("') (J) a: ::J Q) roNcr3OJ ~o.,-g ::f ::ri~3:(fJ(rl ("').. -. Q) ro OJ -. a.::J I cr"""'tla.a.(J) 0" ::J ro g ::J~(J)Q)~ 0-1'\ a. n \D :::rl ("') .,roo,.....OJ OJ!=Lo N3 Q)::J(J)"""@"'C ...... a. -. N 3 C ....IOJr-t'........... (J) a. ::J ro I "'C a. ~ a. ~ lQ' ~ rn ~ 8 ro :::r Q) lQ' ("')::J~(J)a.::J '" (fJ -. ("') ....... \U r-t' 0 :::r Q) :E 0- ., ::J 0 ("') -. "<~.. o~::f cd:Q) r-t'lQ r-t' 0 ri ,..... < ., ::J :::r..~ < OJ ;::;:.. _. ;::r: a. roO CD n :::r ro (fJ ("') 0 (fJ (fJ r-t' ::J :::r ~ OJ C~Q) I ::J CJ""OO a. c ro 0 ~a.::J 0" OJ ::J (f) ~ ro ro r"'t' ~ OJ r"'t' ro .., C ::J -. o ::J I -. ::r (f) n ::r o o - o -. (f) I"""t' .., -. n I"""t' ~ Kir~ I~ ~~~U~~ en o J: o o r- en . O:E oro "< ....,., ;;:on OJ QJ ::J ::J n"< ::ro <::J -. m QJ ro lC 3 ro ro -.....J::J -. or ~~ c: (f) "< n N::r 00 00 :--J:E QJ (J) n o ::J (J) 1""1" """'I c: n or 0... QJ :J 0... o "'0 ro ::J ro 0... -. ::J . Q SQ. -I ::Jor::r 1""1"" ro ro 0 .."""'I m -. OJ < (J) rol""1" (J) ::J :::::!. <l""1"n < c: 1""1" roOJ::r - - QJ =-"< .. (J) -. QJ 1""1" :E ~ =.:0 - I CT(J) roS c:~ V'J roo... o...ro (J) I-t -. ::JlC <::J =.: "'0 OJ OJ lC::J ro ::J Nro 0... OJ ::JO' 0..."""'1 1""1"1""1" ::r::r CD ro m< QJ -. (J)- I""1"QJ rolc """'I ro ::JI--L CI--L """'I (J) CTn QJ::r ::J 0 o . ~I--L)> QJI--Lc.. 1""1"" roOJI:::l; 1""1" ....,., (J) -. c: ::J 0 ::J CD ::J I:::l;roQJ ::J c.. (J) lCCDn CTc..::r ro 1""1" 0 n 0 0 o (J) (J) 3 CD :E CD<=': V'Jro- QJ(J)CT <l""1"ro QJ c: _. c.. n aJroo CT::J::J _1""1"V'J ro(J)q- 3 ~ 01""1" < ro _. c.. ::J -. lC::J ::J' 0 1""1" or 0,,< o @"~ "< ::J :;on OJ:r ::J< n -. ::r- .. QJ lc OJ ro ::J (J) c..N OJ QJ V'J ::J c.. n ::J'" C - OJ < -. (J) r-t OJ (f) n ::J'" o o ~!III& i~ !tt~~ - en (1 :I: Q Q. r- en m - CD 3 CD ::J r-t OJ ..., o -. (J) r-t ..., -. n r-t (;)--1 3:::r oro nlC ..... 0'0 ..... :::E ::J' st- n -1'\ -0 c: ..... ~. ro o n ::J Q) VI _. r-t' ::J Q) ;::;:::J VI 0.. ..... )> ~ c: _. r-t' ro::r :::E 0 . ..... :i ..... ro VI -0 o ::J VI ro ro @= ..... VI VI ::r Q) 0- ro -0 ..... o < c: ro 0.. g r-t' ::r ro ?-00-Q) ~~):.):. ::rQ)O::3 ~ c: = 0 .....Q)~c: rod:o::J _0'""1'lr-t' ~::JQ)0 Q) 0 '""1'1'""1'1 ::J '""1'I;:D' n r-t''"''1'InC: _. c: r-t' ~ ::J ::J ro ro 0'0..0..::J ..... S' '""1'1 r-t' :3lCQ)n Q) n. Q) r-t' Q) =-0 _. ::J r-t' Q) o 0.. ro' n ::J '^-. . VI"" rj" -. r-t' "< @"0::J Q) Q) 0 < 0- :::E Q) VI _. 0 c: Q) ..... VI o-o-ro =:'""1'10.. -. 0 0 ~(ti..... 0'""1'1 n n Q) 0 .....~:3 -oro:3 a 0..-. .......lC ~ ro ..... ro ~oo.. ro :::E . 0.. r-t' ::J::r ro :::E N ::J' VI '""1'1 n . n::rQQ)(ti~--I c:Q)ro-o..cQ)::r _ n, VI 0.. ,,.... n "'" c: r-t' ro ro.....Q)nroro ..Q)Vlr-iVl<:n r-t' r-t' "< r-t' <: -. ~~.....n~~ ..... n, lC' Q ro VI r-t''''''::r-'.....::r ::r::Jr-t'~)>Q) roo..Vl3C:= ::J n Q) n, r-t' Q) roo::J~::r::J n ::J 0.. -. 0 ::J r-t' 0..... ro _. Q) .... r-i c: VI::J -' "< Q) Vlc:::Jr-t' = Q) ::J' ro ::r :::E -< -<lC<Q);::;:-o Q) r-t' ...... ..... 0.. lC - r-t' -' 0 Q).....~::rQ)< r-t' 0 "'" ro -. Q) <: d:............0" . <O,-,Nro r-t' ..... --I::r::J 0 r-t'r-t' ::r'" 0 (D' 0 ::r roo'""1'ln.......ro .....r-t'r-t'''^(J) _. r-t' ...... -. VJ ::J::rroOIQ) 0' ro -. ::J :3 ::J ..... ..... _. 0 0 :J n Q) VI ::J -. ;:) _. 0- r-t' ro Q)~=::::E ::rlC r-t' -. o'-u:ist-o..o ::J c: -. ro 3: o-g::J<ro -0 = r-t' ro r-t' anQ)::ro..... <<nro-oo _. < n n :J -0 0.. 0 0 _. ;:) 0 ro.....:Jrj"ro= 0.. ^ ;:) "< ::J r-t' VI :3 VI~ r-t' Q) r-t' ::J 000-00' r-t' ro ~ c: ro..... ::r -0 "'" ..... ro Q) ror-t' n n ., ::r Q) (;)gr-t'Q) VI ;:)::rVlr-t' 03: ro ro ro Q) ::J 0.. ::J nr-t' 0.. VI VI ::r@" Q)=R OJ' n ;::;: ro' VI ....... (J) (J) r-t'ro ~ :::E 0..Q) Q)lC ..... ro 0.. VI::::!:! r--,O -.....J:::E lJ1V1 ~Q) o ::J 00.. '""1'1 0..< roQ. VI c: lC' :3 ::J ro n VI Q) VI -o::r Q) Q) n :i::J ........0 r-t' ro x n ro ro 0.. n :i m ::J lC ::J' ro ro ..... -. ::J lC -., I- .., CD CJ) I- o - a. (f) rt OJ :::J a. OJ .., a. CJ) . . ~ ~!i~~~ I~ !t~~~ en m ~. m :::a m I-t :J :J 1.0 -. 0 :J :J ffi m ...... :J' -. 1.0 ~ (J)ar ar :J :J n 0- ...m OJ ...... () 0- -. (J)~ ......... "'-J (J) U1m ;:R:E o OJ 01.0 """'tIm 0- m """'tI (J) - _.0 1.0 :E :J (J) Q OJ "'0 :J OJ 0- n -. < ~o .......... - c 3 m (J) m x n m m 0- m 0- n ;;f --f :J'" ., (t) (f) :J'" o - Q.. "'T1 -. :J Q.. -. :J . . z o :J I () o 3 "'0 OJ' :J n ro ............ ::ij: ....... '--"" ~ E~ ~rf~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ en m ~ m :;c (J) n 0 "'""'"' w ~! ~I~ (D (f) . :E .fi c W """"I (f) (D -. . i~ ~~ m :::J c: ......,. """"I I.C :::J CD 1'" :::J I.C ,...,. Z -. :::J . . (D :::J 0 ... (D (D :E (D "'0 :J """"I (D I :::J -. -. :::J ::::!. n n I.C 0 0 :::J a. Q.~ 3 c QJ a. :::J :::J :::J a. a. (D 0 QJ """"I OJ ,...,. """"I a. """"I :J n (J) (D 0 < r-1" 3 :::J -. (D 1----4 "'0 QJ :E :J en -< ... a. (J) :E (D (J) c: m n (D ;::t: d: :E (J) :::J 0 Q.J r-1" ~ ,...,. :::J I.C ..., -. :::J 0 (D OJ ro ....,., ::::!:! m ,...,. ,...,. 0 OJ :::J :::J :E """"I (D 0 AI (D (J) (J) 1--1 QJ c: :::J :::J - 0 a. :::J ro c a. < a. (J) < (J) ,...,. 0 OJ """"I ,...,. ..., QJ QJ C a. :::J 3 Q. OJ (D (f) Q.J 0 (J) """"I C ro a. . (D (D ~ < >< n ro QJ (D """"I (D ..., a. a. (D r a. -. :J ro r-t" OJ :J ....... (f) ....... (f) QJ OJ r-t" :E 0 w ~ :::r :J :J :::r . ~~ iu~ 0 CD r-t" r-t" 0 W CD c: CD a. ., a. ., "'0 CD QJ -. CD CD c: d !~ a. c: c: "'0 (J) (f) . :J CD CD CD ....... r-t" CD (J) (J) r-t" (J) r-t" CD CD :J CD n .....,. ~ < r-t" r-t" < X QJ r-t" ., ~ ., ~ QJ a. :E C Z r-t" 0 (J) c: ., QJ ., QJ ., ., QJ :::!) a. 0- c: c: 3 a. (J) r-t" (f) 0 r-t" (J) (J) CD OJ :J OJ :J QJ ., ro (f) ::J n CD 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 QJ ., QJ ., :J -. :E c: c (J) c: ro a. m I (J) 0 n -< CD "'0 ro CD CD CD OJ :J (J) r-t" ::s:: CD ., < :E < :E :::r o \.c. ::J 0 N QJ CD QJ CD QJ CD QJ QJ c: :J 3 3 ., ., -. . . ., a. a. ., a. ., :J :J ro CD ... ro "'0 - < -. " "'0 ., (J) :J (J) :J U1 (f) QJ ~. CD 0 (f) ro CD CD CD r-t" ., :J ':::f? ., :J < r-t" :E :E ... ro o.\.C OJ a. CD QJ QJ 0 3 :::f: ro ., CD :E -t\ CD (J) (J) ::J :J ., CD ., r-t" CD r-t" \.C CD :::r c: CD :E QJ r-t' :E n - :::f: :J :J :J n . x CD ....... en r-t" 0 :::r :::r r-t" ro CD -I n ., ::J (J) 3 CD a. CD r-t" n 3 :::r CD -. ro a. 0 0' CD 0 "'0 )> QJ CD a. :J r-t" C m :J ro ro CD c: ., r-t" :J ;::::t:.' -< (") (J) ., (f) r-t" QJ (J) r-t" 3 ~ n :J r-t" CD CD QJ ~ r-t" :J r-t' 0 n !:!: ., ... ., :::r ro -. ., 3 < QJ (") CD CD QJ :J -. c: CD :J 3 <. :E ro ., ro OJ (J) ~ a. m CD -< r-t" "'0 QJ (J) r-t" 0 (J) :::r 0 (J) ., r-t" r-t" r-t" OJ :J r-t" (J) 0 ro 0- QJ CD :::r -t\ n 0 r-t" CD 0- :;c r-t" :::r QJ < r-t" Q.J 0 :::r :J CD a. :::f: CD :::r :J r-t" C 3 3 (J) r-t" CD r-t" a. ro CD :::r ro ~ - QJ :::r s:::: r-t" :E CD n "'0 ro ., 0 CD CD ro :J ., a. (J) :E :J CD ., 0 0 ro < QJ (") 3 r-t" :J n (J) r-t" ., (J) <. r-t" OJ -< ....... :::r CD (J) :::r !:!: ""'0 CD :J I r-t" r-t" :J ., 0 :J ., (J). ro ro 0 ., \.C CD a. QJ :J QJ (J) "'0 ....... < r-t" (J) -. rt' . .., ::J :::r ::J :::r 0 0 -t\ QJ :::r (J) (f) a. rt' CD r-t" CD 0 -t\ CD \.C s:::: :::r c: (J) n CD ., QJ ::s:: a. ....... QJ (J) ro 0 ::s:: ... . :J !:!: ~ r-t" r-t" QJ a. 0 3 ., CD :J QJ r-t" QJ :J :J :::r s:::: :J CD r-t" r-t" :J (J) 0' ro :::r :::r QJ 0 ., r-t" r-t" ., CD CD ., -t\ r (J) QJ -. ::J CD -_...,_..,-~ ~'--'-"---'-''''~-''''-''~--'------'-~-'--''~-'--~---- ~~("[)QJ8~ 1lI~~or:31l1 ,"'"t("[)~"'"t\J~ \J"'"tIllg:.Ci):::tI ('[) :::;. or ;;::. t:::'1- 0 ::J .:::s Q... ". ("[) "'"t 9:~ . ~ ~ g:. ::J'-Jt/)tlJ ("[) \Q 05 @' ,"'"t ~ ~ g:. :3 ~ g:. \...i 2 ("[) ~ (j)' ("[) S s. o '" ~ r:: lii t:::'1- ~ 'u ("[) t:::'1- ("[)::JI\JQ... ("'i 0' ::J Q... <:::> _, O"'"t@'~<:::>:3 :3 :::;, Q: ::t ~ \J ("[) "oj 'S....... ~ OQCbtlJr-O r:: -- -- :--. 'S -... (J) """ OJ \j ("[) g:. Q' ~ 0 0 :3 (,[)::J;:j-~::J~ tlJ -. ("[) ("[) 8 M- ::J::Jct~::,tIi tlJn-s:..~.::Jo -> ;:j- -. Q.. \:J ::J tJ:i("[)::J Ci) tn' n \Q ~ Q: :s: . ~g:.~09:! v C6::J::J ' \J("[)"'"t C3~r)~~ \Q Q... g g:. (ti OJG5(1)("[)("[) ::,n-::fV)'" .::J ~, Qj ("[) III C3' 9L S' 3' Cd "'"t OJ lii \J ~ ::Jg-.:::(3<:::> ("[) __:s ,0 :><: ("[) ......: '" 0...... ". -- ("[) ~ ~ c:r ::, V)' ~ ("[) ?5 @ Q.. ~ ::J -- rp lii ~----~---~. _._~ '-'-'---"'--_._~.." ~.~.,"'-~.~--_._-- --..-.-. (J) or ==R ;0 CD (J) Q ::J (J) CD . . o """'tI rT :::J" ro QJ :::J Q) "< {J') (J) . :::J @" n :::J C rT QJ {J') d: o < :::J ro -. "< :::J rT (J) :::J"n ro :::J" ro nCl. ....... C ""Oro "'0 rT ., :::J" o ro lQ ., ....... Q) :::J 3 Cl. C cr~ ., :::::!. :::J QJ ro OJ ~ 0 ::!,!C {J') ro n < Q) QJ ., "< Cl. ro (f) ~ ro .. :E "'0 ro ro ., :::J D.:3 :::J"'O lQ a rT < :::J"ro ro 3 o ro C :::J rTrT n {J') o 3 cr ro ., OJO-l o :::J :::J" C rT QJ ro:::J"rT < ro :::J QJ ., 3: N Cl.Q)O {J') :::J 0 ro ex> :E~C3 ro ., \.0 ., ro .. -rorT S' rT :::J" ro -I ro n2n o :::J -. :::J ,,~ ~ {J') (J) ., ro :::J" Q) :E 0 :::J ro C vr ., Cl. (J) :::J n :::J" ro 0 o ... 3 s.c"'O Cl."'O ro CiOrT ro :::J ro ., n g:. ro 0 ro 3 ~ < "'0 ro QJ ro .c C d: C QJ 0 ., rT :::J ro ro.. Cl. Q. rT _. . :::J" 3 (f)ro"'O rT ....... ., QJ :::J 0 =RCl.< C ro ~~3 o ., ro C Q) :::J Cl. vr ;;:0 ro n o 3 3 ro ~ Cl. OJ r-t' -. o ~ . . w . w . I-L Z o ~ I n o 3 -. OJ ~ r"t" """'"4 ~ 0- c: (f) r"t" ..., -. OJ OJ o c: - ro < OJ ..., 0.. (J) ro :E ro ..., r -. ~ ro ;i ~rJ~ ~~ ~~0!~ ~ en m ~. m :;0 o-:J-I ~. CD ::r 0.. (D CD ,0.. o /"""'t" () o -. ~ _.~ . :J 0 n ....,., ., (D () 0) ::r (J) C CD - 0-0) "< < lJ1 Vi' @" ~ crt o"~ :J /"""'t" G)""": 0) CD =3 o (D :J :J (J) /"""'t" l:J er CD ., ., oq" 0) CD "< 0) /"""'t" ~~ G):J o/"""'t" .......... n crO) ro~ ern ~!i ~ -. ....... (f) (f) c: ro . . w . W . N r o ~ I --4 CD , 3 --I , CD OJ t""1" 3 CD ~ t""1" n OJ ~ EiJ ~r.!~ ~~ !tt0!~ en m ~.. m ::tJ N Q)"U lCIC ro ., ::J n n::::r -. Q) ro (J) ~. ro ::J 0 t""t'"""'h ::::rQ) roc.. c.. ::s: -. t""t' ~o" ., ::J o Q) (J) -<t""t' ~~ ro QJ 3t""t' . 3 ro ::J t""t' n QJ 'U QJ n .::t ., lCI' ::::r t""t' (J) """'h ., o 3 o t""t' ::::r CD ., I--L . () o ::J (J) t""t' ., C n t""t' 0" ::J o """'h QJ ::J ::J c.. ro 'U ro ::J c.. ro ::J t""t' t""t' ., ro QJ t""t' 3 ro ::J t""t' or n .::t ... . o ., ~ ~ ;1 <:roQ)t""t'ro <: Q) c.. ., Q).,c..roN -< crrt~O (J) c -. 3 0 .. _.0 U1 9-~~~ o - t""t' QJ c::::!)n{J) t""t'<QJCDt""t' . CD 'U :x>::s:~~ c.. = -. t""t' c..=:~ro rtO ., o"::J=E::s: ::JG)oQJ QJ QJ C (J) -=c..@" @o::J" 'U::Jro"U (J}ro- QJ 'U QJ O. CD c.. ::J ~ ., g ::J' nO c.. o QJ cr -. c-<ron - QJQJ c.."-"" t""t' "7crCD cr..:::.-c.. G)ro CDOt""t't""t' 'U{J)o~ .,...........Q)t""t' Ot""t'n <.0 n () c.."""'ho::::r rDQJ3c c.. n Q) ::J' r-i 3 < QJ 0 -. ro t""t' c.. (J) rtro~@" ::::r t""t' ro (J) .. CD ::::r 1'\ . ., CD .... ~()::J .::t (J) .. o -. en n c: en en -. o ~ . . w . W . N r o ~ I --i ro .., 3 --i .., ro QJ r-t 3 ro ~ r-t n QJ ~ IE i' !lilY j;i, \~~ ii~ A~ ~ en m ~, m ::a n ~ 0 "'0 (f) n Ei i~~ 0 "'0 rT ~ ...... @' ::J" nr ~ -f w :J rT ~. ::J" ~~. I!~ -. ro QJ QJ rT 0 ~ c: QJ .., . ...... CD (J) (J) CD W ~ 0 :J n QJ ...... rT -. ro rD -. CD OJ (J) rT CJ) CJ" . -. < n :E ...... r-t" N CJ :E 0 n -. "< ro 0 3 0 :J c: (J) n QJ QJ rt CJ) ...... rT - rT C3' (J) CD ...... ::J" ...... QJ ro ro rT r :E ro c.. ...... ::J c.. rT g ...... ...... 0 .. -. :J rT n' r-t" ::J" rT :E ~ ::J" ::J ro ro ::J" rT rT "< QJ QJ ro " rT n n QJ n n 0 rD OJ . ...... ...c QJ n :J n I 0 rT ro c: ...... -. c.. --I c: QJ I 3 ~ -. - :J "< < =to lQ (f) -. CD ~ ro ro ro QJ rT :E ~ ~. :J rT 0 .., -. 3 QJ 0 ro ~ QJ-<' c.. ro :J CJ" ro I ...... rT -. c.. QJ c: ~ --I QJ ro :J ;::;: rT ""'tI -. --I rT ...... lQ ::J" ro 0" ro QJ c.. QJ CD '\ en ...... 0 rT c.. :J QJ rT ([) -. ::J" :J . CD n ):> CJ) rT QJ rT CD QJ 3: ...... .!i m c: ...... --I -t\ ):> r-t" rT n ...... rT ro 3 ::J" ...... ::J" 0 3 c: (J)'" :e. 0 ..rT 0 ro -. rT rT :J QJ (J) QJ CJ" ::J" 1.....1 CD ...... QJ .!i lQ rT :E "< ...... 0 0 ::J :J 3 QJ ...... -. I :J .. c.. rT ro 0 ~ :J ~ rT r-t" m ro c: CD (f) -. ...... :J QJ ." n CJ) rT 3 rT c.. rT CJ c.. ro ::;c QJ c.. n :J ro ro QJ QJ rT (J)' 3 QJ ...... 0 rT (J) ro "'0 ro 0 ...... ro -. :E n QJ lQ ro ...... CJ" s:: ...... QJ QJ U'J QJ 3 -. QJ U'J @ n rT rT n ~ (J) :i ro ...... rT :J rT -. -. 0 ro :J rT rT n CD ...... lQ ::J" rT ...... Q. fJ) c.. -t\ ro ...... ro QJ ......... rT ~ -t\ 0 3: rt c: c: 3 3 lQ c.. U'J :J :J ...... CJ :E "< 0 c.. QJ ro ro ;::0 c: :J 3: ro ro '-" 0 :E ...... :J c.. ro c.. c.. c: ;::;: n lQ rT C3' rT c.. ro -- ...... 0 ::J" U'J lQ 0 ...... CJ" 0 ...... rT ro QJ QJ rT :J @ QJ rT "< ggQJ r-I"n _. -1'\:::J"'-. c.. c.. ~. ([) ~ ~. ~ OJ n lC ciQJ~@- vt([) n 0 =R o ..Q -1'\ o ~ c. (f) ~ ~ (I). OJ ~ :::J'" d: ~ r-I" ([) 0 0 """"I r-I" ~ ([) :::J'" "'0 ([) . ~ ~ ~. lC 3 r-I"@ 0 ([) 0 ~ "'0 ........ r-I" QJ ;:!:; "'0 "< r-I" OJ r-I" :::J'" ~ :::J'" OJ ~OJr-I"r-I" r-I" "'0 :::J'" "'0 0 ([) """"I -. n' ~ ~ r-I" ([) ([) r-I" X o :::J'" r-I" """"I ([) (t gn~ lC.~ 3 ~ ~ 0 r-I" 0 ~ :::J'" C r-I" ([) _ :::J'" Q.. ...(1) "Q 0- o ([) n ([) ~ (I) (I) OJ 0"'0 -1'\0 (I) ;:;: 0" ~ (ji' ~ ([) lC o r-I" QJ' r-I" -. ~ lC =E QJ ;:;: n :::J"'..Q ~. c. (I) n: o ~ o -1'\ QJ n c..OJ Q.. ;:;: 0" ~ QJ n OJ "'0 OJ ~ n OJ -. =R~ OJ ~ r-I" n" -. -g ~ @" ;:;: (I) :::J'" """"I lC' :::J'" r-I" (I) ""'0 c: ., n ::J"' OJ (.f) (D o -t'I ~ c.. ;:::t: o' ::J OJ --i ., (D OJ ,...,. 3 (D ::J ,...,. ::J"' rt (J) I n C """"I """"I ([) ~ r-I" "< ... LV . LV . N r o :J I -I CD ..., 3 -I ..., CD QJ rt 3 CD :J rt n QJ o ~i ~r~~ ~~ I!~~~ ~ en m ~. m :;a 8S:S:~ :J('[)QJQj !!!. Q- ...,. ==R ~rn~::s- QJ""'C:~ g:8C5:Q- :J c: ('[) ('[) :--c :J ('[) \J~QJ:J ::::!. " Q- (") o '-' ;;::- Q """'I -..... 'u 0 8"~s:a ~ ('[)-. ~ -. :J ::j-O[)QJ ('[) ;:J _ ;::;: !::!' "" :J' OJ'(J) lQ :::::::@"~~ O:'"'hc:::j- -.....~:J('[) I\.J-<:::!I!b a~:::::::-t\ a--~C' ~Q-O~ ::::! ~ :J' ;::J ~ lQClJO ClJ ~ !b :J ClJ Q1 ClJ:J- (') c: ~ -. QJ o' ~ or :J~QJ \J3::::::: Qj"!bClJ :J Q.. 01 ::::tIQ-' O!btlJ """'I(")Q- [) (j)' -- o -. !b 5g.g QO!:!: ........::JO ~ (J) or ~ ;::tJ Cb (J) Q ::J (J) Cb . . ~~ o @ @' U1 U1 o N --nO o :J 1.0 n ... """"I n et> 0 B:: C :J :J n I.C -. OJ U1 c.. ::::r 0;0 c:r.C o c.. :J OJ OJ - c.. n 0 OJ 1:1 1:1 rT ~ OJ ~1:1 rT OJ ::::r:J OJ rT rT 0 :E U1 -. C ::J g- et> rT et> OJ c..:J et> c:r. c..OJ cr"< "< cr Net> OI.C I---L -. '-J :J rT ::::r et> ::u CD n o 3 3 CD :::::J Q.. QJ rt -. o :::::J . . w . W . N r o :J I -1 C'D ., 3 -1 ., C'D OJ t""1" 3 C'D :J t""1" n OJ Ei ~r~~ I~ ~~~~~ en m ~. m.. ::0 3c::!:=Z:""""IC:: ::J' 3 rt rn ~ C CD ::r "'0 m (if g ::J' g ::J (f) (f)c.."" .......... QJ CD ;;c, o=<gm """"I ""'0 CD VI _""""I::JUl CD -. "-J Q (f) Q~ o::J (f) -........... a:. VI 3~30~ ........ -. ~ CD........::Jr-t""",o (f)QJ n C ::r""""l cQJ(ifCD.g ~ (j) (J) ~ ro c.. 0 QJ -. ::!. ~::Jo-< ~(J)c..~CD ::Jro(J)"<;.Q c<::r........c ro QJ ........ -. QJ ::J - "'0 = -C"'O $ 3 3 ld c..CD -. QJ ro ::J -. ::J QJ c::Jr-t"..... r-t"r-t" -' CDQJnc.. (f) -. QJ ::J _ (f) QJQJ(f)r-t" ::J QJ c..::Jr-t":::R r-t"QJ~CD ::r<oc.. ,. CD C ~QJlC-g lC ::r =: (f)roon ro c ro n""""lr-t"c oror-t"::J ::J.{g ::r -, ~OCDur ,,-..::In(f) "-J(f),-i::r . CD "<; QJ Ul "'a , -. o , -. ,... t-I t-I ~(rlg.~!11 n (f) CD -' :::-t o "'0 QJ ~ ::J 0 n - 'u c.. ::J -. """"I ~ (f)(f)~ro ,,-.. CD =z: .{g Y1 c::!: -. 0 Ul3g.::J 3 ro -. c.. ;;c, ::J r-t" m ::J' g (J) 0 (.i) c roCX)Q (ifQJ(ii.......::J (f)""'O::J:::R(f) .......... """"I ,,-.. 0 (1) o -. "-J 0 .. """"IQ..........~""'O ro-i3g.a (J) -. ro "'0 (J)........::J"",oCD ,,-..nc""""l::!. 3~(ifo"-< CD (f) (f) :::::!. CD ~~~~-@ C c.. ........ -. CD""""I::::!) "" "'0 < (f) , .... "'0 c..ro::r3CD ~3QJ~c.. ::J ::J' 3 lC ~ CCQJroc.. QJ r-t" _. ::J ro::JQ(f) $(J)@" @" QJ -. n :::R ::J ::J QJ CD c..QJ(J)c.. r-t" ::J r-t" "'0 ::::r:QJ ::ro """"I < """"I -. ~~g@ QJ lC C lC ::r ..... CD 0 -' C rt r-t"(f) "'a , -. o , -. ,... t-I ~ ~ ..., ro CJ) ~ o - Q.. (f) r-t OJ ::J Q.. OJ ..., Q.. CJ) . . Eii~~.~ i~I!M~ :B' -c o r- o m "a "a --i ~n" .., .., -. :::r i~ !~ 0 -. 0 .., ., -. .., CD ,... -. ,... (J) .... .... :::r .... 0 .. .. - Q.. Z 1--1 "'T1 0 :::s -. :::s :J I n Q.. g 0 -. 3 :J 3 "C ." "C - -. . . - Q) 0 -. :::s Q) :::s n n ro r- ro 0 m (/)i::::J r-t", OJ -. ::J 0 Q.. ::::!. ~~ Q.. t--I . t--I n OJ - (/) n o ::J r-t" -. ::J C ([) r-t" o cr ([) -. ::J ::J o ::J I n o 3 "'0 OJ' ::J n ([) ::E rt :J" r-t" :J" ([) r-t" :J" , (t) (/) :J" o Q.. 1--1 CJ) CJ) c ro . . w . ex:> . N Z o :J I n o 3 -. OJ :J (') ro o """'h -0 .., -. o .., -. rt .......-t .......-t --I ::::::r .., ro (f) ::::::r o - Q. ~ bii ~r~~ I~ ~!M~ -c o r- o m 0)> "'0"""1'\ _. _0 :J :J -. OJ 0- :J . (f)ro c"'O . 0 < . ro rT -<=i' o ~3 (). (J) OJ )> @"Z {J) 0 OJ )> :J G) OJ 0 "'0 :J "'0 . o < OJ rT ::J'" ro N o · 0 ~"-J :J () lC< o \J """1'\0 o ;:0 < ro ro {J) . \Dc.. oro :J ~rT o OJ::J"'cr"'T1 < OJ c 0 ro{J)rT. . ClJcrrtrt lCro::J"'ro ro ro ro :J . :J (rl () ffi OJ :E g "'0 () OJ {J) o 0 {J) ro ...... () ...... . ClJ C ~ ro (J) rT rTClJ =:< ~lC ro 3 0 ::J"'-< ro:Jrtro """1'\ cr 3' OJ o ro · . rT "'0 {J) ... \J :E O. rT . ro -. ro < ::J'" o :J ro ro :1 3 rt ~~ro~ .......ClJ:Jro .......=RrT(J) -'"""1'\ ::J'" () :J . 0 OJ lC 0 - = 3c.. {J) - . ro ::J'" <OJClJ ro {J) {J) {J)rT:J OJ -< 0 :J ro rT c..~cr rT. ro ::J'" ro ro --I :J ::J'" ro 3 · ro ro rt ... o -. en () c en en -. o ::J . . LV . co . N Z o :::s I n o 3 -. QJ :::s n CD o """'h "'U .., -. o .., -. rt ....... ....... --i :::J" .., CD CJ) :::J" o - a. ~i I.lr~ ~~ ~~ ~ lu~ '" ." o r- (1 m St:J........~tlJ,-... .., c: <:::> ::r :J ~ J rn :3 Q ~ g: ~. 5" g- ~ ::r"6' :J _-,QQtlJ~ t""\ 'u -- ::r .......Q-,O"'@"(t) I./') ~ \:) I./') @"tUQ@"Ste :J & ~. :J (t) ~ ~;::;:Q:Q:J(t) .., o' 0 tU (J) :J Q..:J:J~C"')""'" ~tUl./').......(t)c:r- o-s-C3'~C: -'V) -,tlJ!;:l. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o :3 ~ o' (ti ::!. (t)"" I./') ~. ~o~~o2' 10-. 2' c: tU ~r=r[)!-t"'No (J) -. 1-.1 @ O' ~lri~{")I./'):J ~ c:r- ::li c:r- .... (t)~c:Yi(t)St :J 0 Cl. :::;. '" ,....,. c: ~ -.:. 'u (ti C5: (t) :;i ~ 1:) V) """'(J)tlJO \j c:r- V) r-. ~ ~ o (J) ::r '-J Qj '. I :J:JO{g~(t) ~(t)~tUc:r-CJ (') @ ~ rl- (1) {g Q.j~V)3~tU ~ tU' (J) 0 rl- . ~:b~:3~ s-1./')(tiffi:J 5-(")"""'''''''' :3V)(J)!:t!;:l. (J)@":J-.:.o (t)....!::t.(t)(t) ,....,. -.:. "'::: I./') No St ill' (") :J '" _c: 0 'u ,....,. ,....,. (J) or ~ :::0 m C/) o ::J C/) m . . g.QJO~ .c..([)::::r ro c.. "'0 ([) {J} · OJ ::::r ([) () o (J) ;:::+ -. -~3~ c..(J)([) 0-1'1 r-t" ::J n ::::rr-t"o . c: ""'Cron::J .c..on o'([)3::.: ::::!. 0.. "'0 (J) rT -. ([) ::::r ,,<::Jr-t"OJ I-t([)([)= I-t ::J' OJ c.. n ::J-' OJ -g c.. (3 (j) _. n .. ~ 3 r-t" CJ Q "'0 g. -< 3 ([) ([) @'OJ3() = ::J ([) -. '" n ::J ~ ,.... ([) r-t" o.QJ3: o([).....OJ ex>-..J::J . ~ OJ QJ -. n lC <r-t"ro ro -. o · g::Jr-t" "'0 0 g OJ ffi ([) ::J < d::;E([) ::J::::rrt lC -. ::::r r-t"9-ro ::::r ""'C ([) 0 G) n' 3: ([) o n ;0 ro n o 3 3 ro :::J Q.. QJ r"t' -. o :::J . . w . ex> . N Z o :J I n o 3 -. QJ :J n (D o ....,.. ""'0 ..., -. o ..., -. rt' 1-1 1-1 --I ::r ..., ro CJ) ::r o - 0.. ~~1~ ~~ !!~~~ ~ -c o r- o m 3 (") 1--1 W 2 I, ~. .!i (f) . E~ i ~~ ~(") (f) CX) i~ I!'f' c . (t) 0 W 2'" (f) C ro 0 ~ . . ...... ("') ""'0 0 .., ~ -. ~ 0 lC !lJ (f) .., ro -. ...... QJ rt eT (f) (t) " (t) ....... (f) a. (t) rT n ~ ~ OJ rT QJ rT rT 0 "'U (J) -C rT ...... --i ~ 0 ro OJ 0 ...... G).!i ^ 3: -. 0 ...... :J r- (") ...... ro o. Q'(f) r ......"'0 0 0 (") ~ :J m 0 (f) c (t) CD ~ rT ("') 3 .., --i ...... CD ro (f) :::T <. rT OJ CD ~ :J ~ OJ rT . ~ !lJ ...... 0 (t) ...... 3: 0 -. :J C rt CD (J) OrT:;EW-f"TI C~:::::r"""':::::rO R"rT(DOCD' O,rT"""'tI'rT 3CD:::::rrTCD:::::r enCD:::::r<(D (D"'O'(D< OOrT ~~ """'tI::J:::::rnCDn rTCl.CDQ) 0 :::::r -. , ::J::J CD~(DCJ)OCl. n Q) :;E 1--1 ::J n QJ ::J ~ ::J CD 0 en "< CD en ~ ~ -. rT '" ~ ::J X -. "', ~ CD 0 < n rtlC"""'tICDC (D QJ rT , c:r. g. ~ <' rT < en CD o CD CD ~"< rT,nrT(D :::::r CD Q) en Q) CD en en Cl...' CJ)C.. C, CD [jf rT CD CD n. rTen QJIeno"'O eno3g.g :;E :;E "'0 CD ~ O~RorT C CD VI ::J -. Cl...' d lC 3 :::::rrT-CD(D Q):::::r(D,CJ) <CDrT,:::::r CD ' 0 CD QJ nCDCl.en< :::::ren CD "'0 CD rTO QJ ::J CD ::J 3 ::J 0 ' en ~(D3CD~ Cl. <. ::J c:r. ~ rTCl.CD3CD :::::r CD (D Cl. CD::J en. @ ::J o -. (f) n c (f) (f) -. o ::J . . w . 00 . W "'U ..., -. o ..., -. t""'t ...... n QJ (f) --i QJ ^ -. :J r o :J CD ..., --i ::r QJ :J ....... o 3: -. :J C t""'t CD (f) ~ il'D ~~, "~~ "'~ f!~ i -c o r- o m s. ~ :-i ~ -. :::r' a g:. (t) :-... 3~~ cu r~ __ ~~ -. -. '-' r) CO(t) ::J~Q c(t)(t) ~\j g:. -. tlJ (t)::3ri- ~rn3 3:o~ a$:....... (t) n..,~ -. ....... :::::::: a("') ::3 g -. ~ ::J -. c: ::J nr~ ...(J) r::'1- tlJ 0 ::JQ Q..c (J) ~ (t) .......;- -'-.::: cu ::3 ::J 0 ~ ::J cu2i: ::::::Q ""<:: .., (ti~ \:J 0" o ::J ~~ g:.'-1 -. (') (J)Qj ~ (J) (J) 6T ~ ::0 (1) (J') o ::J (J') (1) . . rT~ o ::::r "1Jro ...... "1J o 0 ...... ~@ ........ ("') 0 Q) ro - "'tJ -QJ VI ...... ::E rT -. 3 rTro ::::r::::J ...... rT ro VI (J) ::::r -g Q) ::::J (J) ro -. ("') o !:!:VI 3 ro ro'< VI 3 o 0 < ::::J ro rT ...... 0 ~ ...... O"'tJ 3 ~ -. -h ::::J 0 c: ...... nr~ ~ ::::J n ro ::E rT ::::r ...... ro lCI QJ ...... a.. VI "____. ,__.__. __,~.,_ ~_"____',_"_,.___'.~__m.._.__.___,__<.__._________._.,____,.____ ;;:0 CD n o 3 3 CD ::J Q.. OJ r-t -. o ::J . . LV . 00 . LV ""'0 ., o ., -. r-t ....... n OJ (f) ~ OJ ^ -. ::J r o ::J CD ., ~ ::J"" OJ ::J ....... o 3: -. ::J C r-t CD (f) 58 %trl~ ~~ !~~~ I -c o r- o m ............ 3 0 e!~~ -< ~ QJ 3 0 -I (D (D n ...... QJ (D (J) n fir (D ~ ::r <;~ )!'f" ...... r-t' ,..,.. C ...... QJ ~ r-t' ...... -. (f) ~ .., ....... C QJ C \D :::r cr ~ CD (D -,.., ...... \D ~ ...... (J) (D ('[) (f) ....... (f) (D c.. . . '-'" r-t' Q;) ::J lQ ::r r QJ ~ 0 3 0- 3: 0 ::J -< 0 c.. 3 (D QJ - 0 -. (f') QJ 0 ::J ::J a. ... ...... --i ...... !If 0- r-t' 0- c.. :::r (D (f) QJ ... (D -. (f) C QJ 0 r-t' (D ~ ::J r-t' 0- (J) :::r x r-t' (J) 0 (D QJ n (D r OJ :::r < (f) ::J (D c.. (D < QJ (D lQ' ~ '"0 QJ (D :J =... ::J r-t' < a. -t ::J 3 QJ 0 r-t' (D 0 0 :::r ...... -too OJ AI QJ -. :::r QJ QJ r-t' -< N (f') (D 0 r-t' lQ ..., ~ n c.. c c.. (D (D a. )> 0 0 ...... C r-t' ~ (f) ...... ::J QJ (f) :]. ...... (f) r-t' ...... 0 QJ n . . (D r-t' ::J < (D ." ::J ::J (D -too lQ (D C ...... r-t' ............ . -. r (D QJ :::r '"0 ." (D (D (J) 0 8" (J) QJ '"0 (f') (D c.. ^ (D '-'" 0 lQ QJ (D ; (1 -< :::r c.. ; '"0 3 . 0 n (D (D c 0 :::: ...... ::J QJ ::J ...... 0 r-t' !If (f) QJ ...... (D QJ - - 0- QJ r-t' (f) (D :::r r r-t' QJ 0 lQ' ~ r-t' r-t' (f') ::J (D :::r ...... (D c.. ::: QJ 0 QJ ...... 0 N (f) :J .. (D n .. c 0 n c.. ...... r-t' QJ ...... ::J (D ::J r-t' ~ o :::::r o c: ~ Q) a.. Q) -< :::: r o ro .....:::: < o ro ., 0 ro ~ (I) CJ) ...(1) ro ~ 0-,., n" ., ro 3..........(1) o r - ., Ole ro CJ) ::J r-T..........QJ :::::r ::::N QJ n ro ::J :::: a.. Q) QJ ::J ;:+ a..ro r-T :::!. :::::rQJ ., ro (I) ro ro ole ~3 r-T ro :::::r::J ro r-T (I) r-T :::::r QJ r-T or ~ <" ro o "'0 ro -. ., ro ~a.. ro r-T a.. 0 ~ 3 QJ 5 ::J' CJ)r-T QJ -. ::J --j ~o "a~ :::::r 0.'" "a::C . III ",III tn ro .....< ::: 3: "'~ ., ::: :!. m CD ~ <~ <... ~ III .....0. .....111 3: ~ '" -. IC ~ III ~ m ro VI ~ ~ z ., ~ 0. -I ro . ~ ~ -I ~ <' ~ ~ -I !'1 iD ~ ro IC iD ::c ii: IC (I) ., '1:1 III !"" ::T '1:1 I n ::T ~ III n . :J III < :J ~ 0 < IC :J 0 ., :J III ~ '1:1 ~ ::T 0. n I I III 0 I :J -< 0 . < -< 0 3 :J '1:1 3 -. '1:1 n -. n (l)Z Z C I c:ac:a Z c:a c:a 1-1 ~ 0 cc c 3 ~~ c r- "'tJ W.j::Io ~ W ..... m - ::c ::c W < -. ., ., ::c ::c m QJ VI VI ., :::J ..... '-" VI ., r- ~ ..... VI ("') ..... 0 m ~ (t) ~ m ." .... ~ tn ::c W m ., ::c ;:a ..... ., < VI '-" 1-1 n m ..... r- 0 tn ...... ..., ::T .., CD en ::T o - Q.. "T1 -. :J Q.. -. :J . z o :::J n ~ Ei ~r~~ ~~ !tM~ -t ~. -n ." (1 ......H'....."..'....N'..............,.. .............."..,>,.,''',..,...,,,..,.,,'',,.;....~1'' c: --I :::::J :::::J'" Q.(D (D .., .., (D (3 ~ < (D -. .., (D (D ~ r-t . :::::J'" .., (D (D :::::J o :::::J I n o 3 -a -- OJ :::::J r-t Q) ;::+ (D .., OJ (J) (D lC 3 (D :::::J r-t (J) Q. c: ::::::!. :::::J lC r-t :::::J'" (D -a (D .., o Q. ~ CJ) CJ) C CD . . LV . ........ o . ........ z o :::J I n o 3 -. OJ :::J n ro o """'h -I ::J"" '"'"'i ro CJ) ::J"" o c.. (f) It" OJ :::J Q.. OJ '"'"'i Q.. ~ ~~ ~r~~ <g~ !n~~ ~ -I :::0 )> ." ." o 3 ::J ;::;: -. ;::;:OU'l::Jtn--l of"': ::J ""'"'h Z ~ :::T U-I I -. ' QJ("')::Jol-'-ro rorTO 0..< Nro 3 -.ro U1 ::J OJ g."'C lC 3 ~ ;:+ ro -. U'I c::T' ro ro QJrTro,' _. ::J 0 ' ro -. 3rT OJ ... N ::J - -grT9ooU'l ("') :::T s::: 0 ::J ro rTro.....-.....J,lC (J) ...J'" ("') 3 . (6 ("'). OJ 0 ro "'C _. (6 3 ::J o::J "'C rT ;:+,-,c::T'=U'I roQJ- ~ s::: -' ::J 0 _. ::J ::J rT ("') =rolC. OJ . rT ::J' ~ 3 --I ~ ("') ""'"'h 0 :::T s::: rT ::J ro S' a. :::T ;::;: -. roroo3ro ,U'I(6"'C~ roroo..OJrT ("') lC'" ("') ro o3OJVf' 3 ro::J ::J 3::J0..~n roVfntni! ::J("')r-i;;:O- 0..0'< IOJ ~::J(J}I-'-< _. rT rT N -. o -. n. U1 (J) :J ...,... rt ::J s:::::t:: OJ U'I ro <. ~ -. rT <:::r::J :::r rt -. -. QJ 0 = ("') "'C rTc::T',:::T' ~ro~o~ = 0 -g 3' ;:+ ::J -. ro~ 0..8" 0 w -. . CJ) ....... (") 0 c: . CJ) ....... CJ) Z -. 0 0 ::J ::J . . I n 0 3 -. OJ ::J n ro o ....,.. --I ::r ., ro (f) ::r o - Cl. (f) rt OJ ::J a. OJ ., Cl. ~ ~i ~~~. d!tM~ ; -I ~ ." ." o ::J lI) OJ Or) ):::. (J) O@'''''t,...lf) '="'" ~ ~{g :s 0 Qj 8 -. 0 N-"""'" :::h :3 ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ (j) ~ ::J '" ::tJ OJ' 0 N: ~ N m ::J :s' ::t -, a ,^ ,..,.. ;:::J :::!'I o' a VJ 0- 1:J 5' c: ....Q:) C') (t) Q (f) 0 ~ :3 S' 0- a ::J o' ~ ~ @ ~ (J) ::J N- ... . r"'I- ('[) "'" If) -. ..... O-'::J \ U .::J""" \Q.. \Q St ~ S' (tilbr"'l-Ib '" I....... ::t Ib VI' c: a ~, Ib ::J c: ::J QIb\Q\Q r"'I-,-::::J-lf) Q1 ....'J g @' ::BN"""~ r) a St (j)' ~. ~ Ib 8 ~.~ ~ ~ N- ""'" -.: -. (') III S' :30::J\Q S' 5 ~1:J \Qr)""0 1:J ::::.: :=:::: ~ QJ tJ-1 ::J:3IbV) If) Ib...... :::0 Ib ~ I 1lI!::!,"~'- ,..,.. ::J' 'u N St~ ~ lr1 o ::J::t If) !::!'" ..., Ib ::J' ..... \Q::B r) r-t"r-t"3(") ::::r ::::r _, "T'1 , ro rt 1"'1" I"'J ro -. "< ro ~ g:~ m n o (ri!if~ 0 Q. ro -. 3 (J) VI ::J ::J r-t"rooro QJ ,,... ::J ro 3 ............ I , 0.. 3 On S' QJ ro 1.0 ro ,::J3V1 ~ Q. r-t""'O r-t" . VI =QJ a. 8 ~ ~ QJ ::J n VI rt !:!: ro ::::r 0- . ::J -. QJ C ....,., = ~ ro"'O"'O S ~ a .. r-t"< cr I -. ro(J')Q. ;;oro ::J ~ ' o N ro ::Jl)1n I 0 n r-t" 3 o OJ 3 3~ "'0 _.ro =(")::J QJ(J)Q. ::Jr-t"QJ r-t"C!:!: ~ ~g rtffi(J) :::J'" _, r-t" r-t"::J:::J'" ::rQ,QJ CD n.r-t" -iQJ~ , r-t" -. QJro= ~r-t" -. ::::r n QJ r-t" w . ........ o . ........ z o ::J I n o 3 OJ ::J n CD o """'h -I :J"'" .., CD (f) :J"'" o c.. (f) rt OJ :J c.. OJ .., c.. es t\I~~ ;1i~ 1~~0!~ ~ -4 ::a )> ." ." o CJ) 1--1 W ~~~ r-t" (J) . """"I ........ CD (J) ~~ !~ ro c: 0 r-t" . ~ ~ CD I\J Q) < . . ro 3: 3 ro OJ ::J -. r-t" :J OJ r-t ::J (t) a. :J 3 OJ OJ :J ::J n ~ r-t" (t) ro ::J OJ ::u Q) :J ::J ("') c.. )> CD . ;0 (t) II :::::r II OJ CJ'" r-t 0 OJ r-t -. 0 :J 0 """'t\ n -. r1" (f) r-t ..., (t) (t) r-t (J) :J o r-t" ....... C (J'J r-t" r-t" o ...... (1) ::r QJ 0- ro(J'J::r(J'Jor-t"(") -n r-t" QJ < 0 0 ;;:t' QJ (J'J ...... "'- 'LI =R ro ~ 3 C ~ o-..c QJ "T'"'t :J ...... (1) C ...., Q. (5 ~l@ (6~ ~"'O O:J 0..< ro Q) 3 QJ r-t" CD :J ~ 3 ::E 0 3 r-t" ro CD QJ "'0 (1) QJ 0.. :J ...... ......:J QJ o..o..ror-t"""O QJ :J < n ~ ...... d:lC ~ 0 ro ffi o "'0 r-t" :J 3 0 :J Q) n 0.. C (J') < 0 d: CD r-t" (1):Jo~o 3 d::J ,?:J ro:J ...:::. :J C (J'J QJ :J r-t" ro n :J :t> ...... o..QJ QJ"T'"'t ro "'0 (J'J lC ~ ::r Q) (J'J ro QJ < ::::!) ~ N (J'JO:roro:Jo r-t"r-t"30..r-t"o o Q) (1) Q) (J) '-I O "'0 d: :J (J'J "< ... < ro 0 r-t" lC (J') (6 ro =+. :J 0.. 0 CDr-t" Q) ...... 0 n CD 0 3 =+: Q) 3...... 0 fir 0.. -. :J .......... "'0 r-t" q- ~. Q) :t> 3 Q)::rQJ......:J -:J < CD n Q):J g,lC ro 3 ...{If d ffi 0 r-t" 30 :J-C(j') CD (J') ...... lC n :J rt CD ::r 0 r-t" () ::r rt 3 o Q) ::r (J'J 0-(1) 3 r-t" I r-t"(")r-t" Q)~3 O...-t: ... ro (j') :J :J r-t" r-t" ...... CD QJ r-t" 3 (1) :J r-t" r-t" QJ (j') r-t"r-t" ro 0 g,3 ro Q) :: :J -I ~ @" ~ ......:JlC (j') r-t"r-t"O ::::!}::rQJ ...... ro ~o- ::: ro (J'J r-t" n o :J 0.. d: o :J ... 0- QJ (j') -I (1) ::r 0..(1) g (1 ~ o -. (f) n c: (f) (f) -. o :::J . . w . ....... o . N 3: QJ -. :J r1" CD :J QJ :J n CD QJ :J a. ;;0 CD ::r QJ cr r1" QJ r1" o :J o --"h () r1" (J) r1" ""' CD CD r1" (J) Ei ~~~ ~~ !!~~~ ~ -t :;0 )> ." ." o 00:-1 (f) ::J (") :;0 LV ~! IJ% g:.~:::r 0 . (1) g:. (1) @" .. ::J ro ....... 1!~ '/!~ CD """I(1){} (J) r1'" n 0 ~ .. ~ 8 ::o~ "'0 CJ 0 . 0 n N ::J Qj :::tJ ::J !If 3 St&~ (J) ('[) (!) (J) 3: Ilj :3 (f) 8' :::::r 3 Gr(1)QJ V) 0 OJ . ::J ~ c: ro -. r1'" a. :J """Ilj 0 :::::r :J ::s:a. CD n 1""1' ClJ (1) :::J ""'0 0 c.. CD ::JQ.. V) CJ ::J OJ :J QJ < d: OJ ~g:. ('[) CD ::J r"'t' -. :J . . 3 c: 0 :3 ~ (!) (!) n -t (1) (1) ::J r1'" :J CD ::J (") r1'" 0 . . ::0. """0 3: c:r OJ ~~ (!) :J QJ )> (/j Q1 ::J QJ Q. CJ ::E ore') I.C ;U :3Gt (!) CJ " .. CD QJt1" 3 a. ::r " ::J ClJ CD CD Q..~ ::J a. OJ r1'" c:r cr (i)' Q.. (f) QJ 0 "tJ0 -< (J) -. (J) CD 1""1' ":'I ::J r1'" a. OJ ~~ CD 3 0 1""1' QJ?t ::J 0 ~ ":'I .. :J ::J' (!) ~(1) n 8 0 0 8"3 3 --n QJ :3 3 n ~ ~ (!) -. ::J 1""1' a.~ a. CJ (f) c:!" d: o' 0 1""1' ::J ::J .., (f) (J) CD CD 1""1' Cf) n "Tl 0....,., """"I -I o C OJ::J'" 3 I""1'"C d:ro ....... C """"I 0 '-' """"I "< n OJ' ro ro 0 -. :::s",""""OJ"""'~ no """"I lJ1 .. """"I(/)O(/) ro ro .. n 0= cQJO'"""O'" :::s (J) ro UJ """"I d: 1""1'" lC (f) QJ (J) :::sO "Tl ~ ~ ~ ;. -g ~ ;;c n' lC """"I ~ OJ QJ -..t"" ro 1""1'":::S03 :::sro 0 g.g.~o~ o QJ 0 -0 (/) o..l""1'"wO rol""1'"l-o:::S -::J"'OCO ;;cro~_1""1'" rol""1'"" ~A"" "< ::J'" OJ -. ro """"1(/)0-0 rro (/):::s 1""1'" d3-::J"'::J"'-o QJooQJQJ -:E(/)n ~o..:::s:::sro :E 0:E (/) :::s 1""1'" -. n 1""1'"0'"g. O:::S::J"'rolC (J)::::J~ro~""""I 1""1'" 1""1'"-'0 28QJ3:E n30'"rog. nrro ro 1""1'"... 0..0'"0'"(3'1""1'" QJ ro """"I ::J'" nOl""1'"ro A"":E::J"'Q1' _. ro n :::s -0-' g QJd: (/) ro 1""1'"(/) -i :J'" ..., ro (f) :J'" o - 0.. "'T1 -. :J 0.. -. :J . . z o :J I () o 3 '"'0 -. OJ :J n (D jg G) -0 ~ = -I c(f)~I""1'"Q'"::J'" _. "Tl (/) ro QJ ro -o-oro~'n -0 ro a. 1""1'" "<;, -. ~""""I OJ(J)~ ........(/)rtj-o OJ" C OJ (/) :::sog.con::J'" 0..0 oroOJ 01""1'"lJ1" (/) ::J'" 0 n @"-g~~cBo ~-gg.0'"""""I~ o..-""CI""1'"q- . OJ "':.,:::J"'c d:no..ron o -. I 1....1 1""1'" :::s~$2CC1' . >-:::so r:E !;"Tro" d=-Iwg QJ:::s~..oo ~ ~ n N~ Q1'Q1'ogo n=~O~ -. 1""1'" =0'"""""1 G)(/) d: ro C (f).c roon"TlC (J) < d: QJ QJ<OI""1'"""""I """"I 1""1'" :::s 0 ro ro::J"'o@"nr 1""1'" ro ....,.,..- ro On(/) -. 1""1'" O'"riOJ:::S'-" ro~ cil""1'"G) < ::J"'(f) OJ -. ....,., ro ...... a. a. OJ II roronQJ"-" -. """"I .c""""l=roo CQJd:QJ""'" QJd:ro QJ 1""1'"0(/)roo.. ro OJ a. "< 0 (/) (/) ....,.,::J"'I""1'"d: lJ1OJoo o ....,.,:::s og OJ -i :J'" ..., ro (f) :J'" o - 0.. (f) r-t' OJ :J 0.. OJ ..., 0.. (f) . . ei '"~ ~~I!b~ ~ r- m ~ ::;c m en ;;0 "'C ,.,.. "TI OJ ro ::::r 0 :J ' (ri , n.......(I),.,.. ::::ro::::r::::r Oooro 0..00..(3' ro"'C(I)1:: ;;orD@";:+ ro .g :J ::::r -< -o..n -!'DQJo -. , g--10..~ OJ::::roro -< ro ~ n , "'C I:: o-ro,!:!: , -. 0 < QJ (J) < rD :J OJ a:-< 9- :J 5' rD . I::lD ~ , ... lD U1 ,.,.. roO::::r :J 0 ro Q lD (") , -. 8"~~ o-(I)::::r ro (I) OJ lD...c(J) -. I:: :J :JOJo n',.,.. o ro n :J or 0 ~rD3 , ,.,.. "'C 1::0- n -. ,.,.. ~ ro o' =: 0.. :J g- :E oQJ;::j.: ~'::::r ,.,..-< ::::r~"'" ro~~ !:!: ro (I) Jo-oo4 CJ) CJ) c:: ro . . w . (Jl . ........ r -. cr ..., OJ ..., OJ c -. Q. -. ::J ""C OJ ::J ~ i~ eii ~~ I~i Ij~ r- OJ :::c )> :::c m en @,30~ non =':(J')QJr-r -. r-r r-r ::r r-t roO "< !:Q. Cl. C r-r lQ r-r 0::J=r-r r-r:;;g-;l ::r -. QJ ,.... ro@~;;o C::J QJ (J')r-r@'::J ro -. n . ::J n. ::r . ~=o C !:!: roroCl. ::J (J) ro ~.g ;;0 lQ(J)ro -t\ro"< QJ:2= n",O'" r-r ,.... . o r-r QJ · ::r~ o ro ... ::Jror-r =QJ~ O"'~. · " ro QJ (J') ~ a: (i)' croQJ (J')O- ro -t\ QJ (J)gR- "OcO . --t\ o OJ n X. < 0 3 -. ::J -. ~ < r-tQJro ,,<. ::J o -. -t\-"~ r-r::rr-r ::rro- ro "< n r-r (J') (J') r-r -., QJ ::r 0 "< ::r ::r ~c~roro (J') (J') !:!: ro (") r: Q' g ...g 3, ~ g- ::Jr-rCl. ::J(")QJ ~~5~gg~ ::J n r-r n::J-., no On::r ::r::JO"'O"'::J=':. o (J) ro ro 0' -t\ ro Cl.q"::J(J').03- roclQn3.0 n(J')::rQJ3,... d~~::JQJ~ ::J(J')c@"<r-r o ::!) ro'" QJ QJ -t\ ~ Cl. QJ Cl.o ~ QJ r-r::J QJ W 'G 0 Cl. -g. a.. OC n g,QJ ... ::J 0 QJ ::J 3....... oro3r-rCl. 8N3 n -t\"O I Oroocro (J') 0 ::J ::J ::J 3 ..o.::::!n~Cl.ro ffi ro 2 fiT ~ ~;!~~~~ I '" ::r 0 n o' 0' ,.... ::J (J') ::J o ....... ::J... r-r ...r-1'" \.Or-1'" 0 03: \.O~.O"'ro 2'ooroQJ.QJ -r.m:J:J (J') I 0 .,... C (J') 0"'''< r-r...... . ro. ro::rr-r ro :2 QJ OJ ro ::r . n' ~ (A · ro ro QJ -..0 ...ro 3:~n O"'C . QJ ~.. QJro~g,Qj~rn "0 lQ ro ro - "< "00. g, . ::J ""'0 QJ o QJ QJ r-r ~ ::J (J') -t\ - C 0'" ~QJ ::J' ~ lQ ;;0 ro "< (") o ::J (J') r-r . c n !:!: o ::J ... n QJ ::J 0'" ro lQ ::J o :J n ro (") o c ::J n o -. CJ) (') c: CJ) CJ)f-. o :J . . w . U1 . .......,. r -. 0- ., OJ ., OJ c -. c. -. :J ""0 - OJ :J e~ IIl~ ~~!!!~~ [i2] ~ r- I:D :::0 )> :::0 m en ~:::E1:J ~r- ('t)::::::..:~tlJ;:::;': ('t)--O:::J~ tlJg-~g.Qj l;) ('t)O~ O~V)QV) Cti~~~6T {g :::J -. ~ ~ oQQ('t):::E -. ('t) :~ '0:::: -. li) :::J v. 1:J ::::::: ('t)"""8"~C") ~ -6 g:~' ~ !- a ('t) (") :)' ........ :::J ....,...,. c:: '>-'DffitlJ(t) OV)(J)~ c:: or 0 83~o -.: :::::::: a 1:J !!2, tlJ ~ g. ~ ~ 0' :::::!. a ('t) ...., ~~('t).g Qj a ~--. ~C:::::J'o,.J 0....., ~ ~ :::JQo2" a ~ g::::J ~ 0 ('t) N: '\J ...., ft. c:gQoV) ~:::J ~ 8" Ii~acu ~2~a.. l:j~:::JQ1 ('t) o' N: :::J :::J :::J ft. (") 9- r_ (t) '~ v. ~ 3' 8" g: ('[) _. (t) V) :::J ~ (J) Cti ::+: ;0 (t) (J) o ::J (J) (t) ro r-t" "'0 --I Q.J=r-~ """'I ro Q.J -' ro ""0 :J ~ CJ'I"TlQ.Jr-t" r-t"o:J=r "'0 t---ooI Cl. ro @ .."Tl !:!: n CJ'I Q.J 3 ".: d:Jro"'< (DCl.=n :J 0 r-t" n (D ,.... -. 0 ..... 3:JO'~ ro~"""'I:; """'I c:r-t"Cl. n =r -. !:!:ro(rl o """'I n :J ro r-t" "'0 o-r-t" -h~~ r-t" -. =rCJ'ln ro =r -. ;;o3~ Q.J ro 3: :J :J Q.J n r-t" =ro:J o -h~ Cl.r-t"ro ro =r """'I _(Dr-t" ;;0 CO ro Cf' "'0 -< """'I """'I _QJro -. """'I ....... Cf' -. "-J ..., CD Q) Q.J (J) """'I ~ n ro .. 0 QJ Q.J 3 CJ'I r-t" "'0 -a r-t" 0 ro =r :J O. ro ro :::!) :J n r-t" o -h . . ;0 CD n o 3 3 CD ::J a. OJ rt _0 o ::J . . w . U1 E~ ~r~% ~~!!M~ ;,; . ........ r -. 0- ., QJ ., OJ c r- aJ ~ )> ~ m en _0 - 0- -, :J "'U QJ :J """'""'''''''';''''''''''''''',"""'';:''/h",,L','';',',y',';;;;';;,";;;;L,',;'i"','/'i rT-j ::r::r CD CD 0....... CD \..0 n \..0 CD ex> 3 r c:r -. CD c:r ...... ...... NQJ 0-< ~3: G)~ CD rT ::J CD CD ...... OJ -u _ OJ -u::J OJ U)' ::J Cl. CC '1:J CD Cl. rT QJ 0 rT CD c:r . CD C '1:J Cl. QJ rT CD Cl. QJ ::J Cl. ::J CD CD Cl. {J} g ...... CD ::::!:! CD n rT ""'"'"' CJ) CJ) c ro . . w . V1 . N C a. OJ r-t -. :::J ~ ~~ ~r~~ i~ ~!M~ dP r-t :J"" CD r -. 0- , OJ , r- OJ ~ :;tJ m en :s: OJ en r-t CD , ""'0 - OJ :::J (J) 0 ""'0"'0 1-1 t""'t"""""-o:J QJ QJ-r-. ~ :J '-' QJ -. cr c a. :J......cQJa. lO~"'Ocr.~ QJ "" g. 0 0 :J@'t""'t":J:J a.nro=r ::r -. :J 0 ocr.ro3 c: ro ro ...... (J) a. (J) (J) o QJ t""'t" ....,...:Jo a. -8ron ro .Q g ...... C (J) QJ -. cr."'O a. o 3 ro :J ro ...... :J n t""'t"::r ... QJ QJ :J :JlO a. :J' t""'t" o a. t""'t"ro ::r:J ro cr. N-<' 0-' o:J (J1lO G):J ro ~ :J a. ro (J) QJlO ro ""'O:J QJ ~ :J QJ :ElOC(jj ::r q-"'O a. QJroa.cr t""'t":JQJ-< na.t""'t" o (J) ...ro "'0 :Jt""'t"t""'t"d ~ 0 ::r........ t""'t"a.ro~ crort""'t" (jj:::!)ciro (J) :J ...... a. DJ ro QJ cr a. g. -< c. 2ro3:a. c QJ QJ I QJ a. (J) 0 t""'t"rot""'t"c ro.Qrot""'t" c ...... QJ n -< o -. (f) n c: (f) (f) -. o ::J . . w . Ul . N C c.. Q) rt -. :J rt :::r ro r -. 0" ..., Q) ..., :s: Q) en rt ro ..., "'U Q) :J Ei f'*, i~ ~!~~~ ~ r- OJ ::0 )> ::0 m (J) (J) or ~ :::0 m (f) Q ::J (f) m '- N-N- '-' :::r-:::r-QJ'::T1lf) ftifti@'OJIb~ ~lf)lf)~eQ -' :::r- ,..,.. -. ..., ..... 00 Q:(t)-' ___9"(t) OJ ~P..(t)lf)g:.c::t . ~ 5.:S:Ib.g ::J IJ') ~ If) N- Q C3' @' ~ g' (ti ""'t ""'t - 8 ffi :52 @' ~ :::"1@'OJ(f)g:. ;;::so-;::JQIb :3 - ~ . ~~;!QJ;R . Q S' Ib 8 Cj :::r- \C ::s: ~ ~ ~@'~s.~ (f)C1:)@'r.. 8" re.. ""'t ::J ~~ Ib S. :52 ,..,..-< ~lbQJC3'o- C1:)Qr::J""'t~ (')"'t:N-....... Q: :....!. 1:) :::r- \C !i~@-~,~ " OJ @' 1:) r- ~5.~~~ :::r- ::::::.:~Qj (;). (f) -.; \U .~ (t)r)O""" rB;<Q~lf) ;::::. ::J No ::;r No ,_ J If) :::r-..... :::r-(t)C5.:Ib~ Ib Ib ""'t t:: ~ Noc:r'::::::: :::r-QJ (t)~ I-" '-'" ;:c CD n o 3 c 3 Q. CD OJ ::J r1" a. -. OJ :J rt -. o ::J ~cn)> QJ "'0 OJ :::J c.."'O tR c..QJ OJ CD ~ nr o. tR c..r-t"~C (/)::::T--t'I- """"I ro """"I r-t" o -. ~~3~ """"I """"I r-t" r-t" CDOJ::::TCD :::J ., CD --t'I n "'<; C rt'"TInr-t" OJ!i~ n. cri" CD rt = _. C 0- CD "'0 """"I (/) c.. OJ 3:~-< OJ CD :::J ~c..CD CD G) CD """"I CD c.. "'U:::J(/) QJ CD 0- :::J """"I QJ ... OJ (/) -CD OJ"'Uc.. :::J - c..OJC _:::J"'O ..... 0 ::::TQJ:::J CD :::J g.c..S: """"I QJ CD ro n (J) n :::J ::::TOn o """"I """"I -c..CD c.. -. OJ ~ ~ "< c.. . . LV . U1 . N r1" :::J" ro r -. 0- ., OJ ., 3: OJ en r1" ro ., -0 OJ :J ~i ~~~ i~ !~~~ ~ r- m ~ :;0. m en ~ 8g:.0::-i 3Cb~:::r: \:J :::r g. Cb (i)CbCb{) r::'1-tlJrr,~ ~~~tlJ S' ~... :J N-~Q. g:.::r-::r-rT1 Cb Cb -. c:: 1\,Jc:g.r) Ca. .......OJ~~ ....... :J :::::: "5:: r\., (") S,!l '. 8 ~ Q.g 1\,J!1>8.~ !::!' CbOJ 3' ~ tlJ (ti Cb -, :J :i'lntlJtlJ ~~:g~ ~ 5' d (t) ~\:J~ OJ -, @" OJ' ~ Q.@"~ g:.~:J OJ I -, ~ ~.~ ::)-Cbg:. Cb Q Cb --::::-- &ciQ :"'! Q1 Cb ~~ ~ (") c:r-.g g OJ 3 __:J('[) Q.g.:J c:r- ...,.. Cb tlJ ...,.. (J) or ~ :::0 ('t) (J) Q ::J (J) ('t) N ........... =):> ern .. r"t" Q) -, ~ (5 . -< "'0 c: .. (f) c: CD "'0 Q) :J :J -. :J lC a' .. CJ :J CD :E m CJ (f) r"t" CD .. :J C .. er Q) :J () CD :J (If .. er .. CJ :J n ::r ;0 CD n o 3 3 CD :J c.. OJ r-t -. o :J . . w . Ul . I\J C Q. OJ ~ -. :J ~ :r CD r -. cr .., OJ .., 3: OJ fJ) ~ CD .., ""C - OJ :J ",," """"""",r" e~ ~r,l~ ii~ ~t~~~ ;,; r- -. OJ ~ ". m en ~ = P- C) ~ o n ~ o ~. = ...... ~ o t-t ~ r.n =r o ~ ~ ~ = rc U1 .... N o o 00 n ~. ...... ~ n o ,: = n ~. 1--1 """'- ~ 1--1 ~ = = ~. = CIQ n o e e ~. r.n r.n ~. o = A. 1,( " , J :::J~ '0'" \" _ ~/'i " I" "-, c-' !'(I!' '(!II' I (Ii! ' , 6g ~\I\\ \,1;;;:/ r, 51 !iI;!)) )',VYjlr:-:J J~ c:;; {(II :,y-' ~. /,I"~\ ~ ~~ '{(Jill ~ ,~~ vh))\ j)\ t '0 ~)~LJ U '0 ~~ C<~ 00 -< I-t ~ 0 ~. ~ QQ~ ~~ ~~ (J~ o = 9 ~ 9~ ;;. 9 ~. rD o = = ~