HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 2001/04/10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
April 10, 2001 6:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista
CItY OF
CHULA VISI'A
City Council City Manager
Patty Davis David D. Rowlands, Jr.
Stephen C. Padilla City Attorney
Jerry R. Rindone John M. Kaheny
Mary Salas City Clerk
Shirley A. Horton, Mayor Susan Bigelow
The City Council meets regularly on the first calendar Tuesday at 4:00 p.m.
and on the second, third and fourth calendar Tuesdays at 6:00 p.m.
Regular meetings may be viewed at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesdays on
Cox Cable Channel 24 or Chula Vista Cable Channel 47
AGENDA
April 10, 2001 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Davis, Padilla, Rindone, Salas, and Mayor Horton.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, MOMENT OF SILENCE
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
· PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF
APRIL 8 THROUGH APRIL 14 AS TELECOMMUNICATIONS WEEK
· PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF
APRIL 8 THROUGH APRIL 14 AS INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SAFETY WEEK
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 1 through 11)
The Council will enact the staff recommendations regarding the following items
listed under the Consent Calendar by one motion, without discussion, unless a
Councilmember, a member of the public, or City staff requests that an item be
removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out
a "Request to Speak"form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk
prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed
afier Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of March 20 and March 27, 2001.
Staff recommendation: Council approve the minutes.
2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A. Letter from the City Attomey stating that to the best of his knowledge from
observance of actions taken in Closed Session on April 3, 2001, there were no
actions taken which are required under the Brown Act to be reported, except for
the City Attorney authorization to sign the amicus curiae brief in the case of City
of Pomona and Qui Tam Plaintiff Nora Armenta v. Superior Court of California
for County of Los Angeles No. B148045.
Staff recommendation: The letter be received and filed.
3. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AMENDING ORDINANCE 1670, RELATING TO SIGN PERMIT AND PLAN
REVIEW FEES; AMENDING ORDINANCES 2507 AND 2509 RELATING TO PLAN
REVIEW FEES FOR BUILDING AND MECHANICAL WORK RESPECTIVELY;
AND AMENDING CHAPTERS X (BUILDING AND HOUSING), XIV (PLANNING),
AND XV (FIRE) OF THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE (SECOND READING
AND ADOPTION)
A comprehensive review of all fees related to building permitting, inspection, and plan
check services was undertaken due to recent, significant changes in the pace of
development in eastern Chula Vista, staffing, staff compensation, and changes in
operations and automation. This review has resulted in proposed fee changes for building
permits and related activities. The proposed fee schedule has been developed based on
current operations, development volume and service provision costs, and spreads these
costs equitably to those receiving these City services. Although some of the proposed
fees are higher than those currently charged (based on the costs of providing these
services), adoption of this ordinance will cumulatively lower fees by 1 - 1.4 million
dollars on an annual basis, compared to the current fee schedule. This ordinance had its
first reading on April 3, 2001. (Director of Planning and Building~irector of Budget and
Analysis)
Staff recommendation: Council place the ordinance on second reading for adoption.
4. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL TO SANDAG OF TWO APPLICATIONS WITH1N
THE MONTGOMERY ANNEXATION AREA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002
TWO-PERCENT NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
(TDA) AND TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX (TRANSNET) BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN PROJECT FUNDS
The City submits an updated list of projects for inclusion in the implementation program
of the nun-motorized element of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
annually. SANDAG regulations require that official applications be submitted in order
for projects to be considered by SANDAG's Board of Directors for funding. In order for
the applications to be considered, Council must adopt a resolution authorizing submittal
of the Fiscal Year 2001/2002 non-motorized transportation applications for available
TDA and TransNet funds. Both funding sources form a single fund with annual
allocations totaling approximately $3.2 million for the San Diego region. Projects are
chosen and then approved for funding after SANDAG's Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory
Committee has evaluated the applications. (Director of Public Works)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution.
5 A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING FiNAL "B" MAPS FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 96-04, OTAY
RANCH SPA ONE, VILLAGE 5, NEIGHBORHOODS R-28, R-32A AND R-33;
ACCEPTiNG ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE ASSIGNABLE
AND IRREVOCABLE GENERAL UTILITY AND ACCESS EASEMENTS, THE
SEWER EASEMENT AND WALL EASEMENTS GRANTED ON SAID MAPS;
APPROViNG THREE "B" MAP SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS;
AND AUTHORIZiNG THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENTS
04/10/01
Page 2 - Council Agenda
B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING THE SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT FOR VILLAGE 5, NEIGHBORHOODS R-28, R-32A AND R-33 OF
THE OTAY RANCH PROJECT, REQUIRiNG THE DEVELOPER TO COMPLY
WITH CERTAIN UNFULFILLED CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 18398, AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
Adoption of the resolutions will approve the Final "B" Maps for Neighborhood R-28, R-
32A and R-33 of Otay Ranch Village 5 (CVT 96-04) and associated agreements. Otay
Project, L.P. is the current owner of the properties. On April 20, 1999, Council approved
the "Agreement for Financing and Construction of Olympic Parkway and Related
Roadway Improvements". The approval of the subject Final Maps comply with the
development thresholds established by the Olympic Parkway Agreement. (Director of
Public Works)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolutions.
6 A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROViNG FiNAL "B" MAP FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 96-04, OTAY
RANCH SPA ONE, VILLAGE 5, NEIGHBORHOOD R-29; ACCEPTiNG ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE ASSIGNABLE AND
IRREVOCABLE GENERAL UTILITY AND ACCESS EASEMENT, THE SEWER
EASEMENT AND WALL EASEMENT GRANTED ON SAID MAP; APPROVING A
"B" MAP SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT; AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROViNG THE SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT FOR VILLAGE 5, NEIGHBORHOOD R-29 OF THE OTAY RANCH
PROJECT, REQUIRING DEVELOPER TO COMPLY WITH CERTA1N
UNFULFILLED CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 18398, AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
Adoption of the resolutions will approve the Final "B" Map for Neighborhood R-29 of
Otay Ranch Village 5 (CVT 96-04) and associated agreements. Otay R-29, LLC is the
current owner and developer of this property. On April 20, 1999, Council approved the
agreement for financing and construction of Olympic Parkway and related roadway
improvements. The approval of the subject Final Map complies with the development
thresholds established by the Olympic Parkway agreement. (Director of Public Works)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolutions.
7. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING THE FORM OF A TWO-PARTY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AND VARIOUS CONSULTANTS FOR ENGINEERING AND
LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK SERVICES; AMENDiNG THE DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS AND DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUDGETS
BY APPROPRIATiNG $75,000 AND $25,000 RESPECTWELY, BASED ON
UNANTICIPATED REVENUES FROM DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS; AND
AUTHORIZiNG THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT(S)
(4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED)
Page 3 - Council Agenda 04/10/01
The subject agreement(s) will provide the City with the ability to respond to the ongoing
plan check work while maintaining a delicate balance between the quality of review,
overall project processing time, and permanent staffing level. (Director of Public Works)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution.
8. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AUTHORIZING THE EASTLAKE COMPANY TO CONSTRUCT AND RECEIVE
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CREDIT OR
REIMBURSEMENT FOR OLYMPIC PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN
HUNTE PARKWAY AND THE OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER, AND HUNTE
PARKWAY BETWEEN OLYMPIC PARKWAY AND SOUTH GREENSVIEW
DRIVE/OAK SPRINGS DRIVE, AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS
DIRECTOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT WITH THE EASTLAKE COMPANY,
MODIFYING THE REQUIREMENT OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
The City Engineer received a letter dated November 16, 2000, requesting reimbursement
for the construction of a portion of Olympic Parkway and Hunte Parkway, which are
included in the City's Transportation Development Impact Fee program. Council
previously authorized grading and construction of wet utilities for these roadway
segments on December 8, 1998. (Director of Public Works)
Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the resolution.
9. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING A NEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT, TRAFFIC
SIGNAL iNSTALLATION AT MAIN STREET AND MAXWELL ROAD (TF-292)
AND TRANSFERRING EXISTING APPROPRIATIONS OF $125,000 FROM THE
CHULA VISTA CORPORATION YARD PROJECT (GG-131) TO THE NEW
PROJECT THEREFOR (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED)
On September 15, 1998, Council approved an agreement with SDG&E to purchase their
property located at 1800 Maxwell Road for the purpose of constructing the City's new
corporation yard. City staff determined that it would be necessary to install a traffic
signal at the intersection of Main Street and Maxwell Road, in conjunction with the
corporation yard project, in order to assign the proper right-of-way and maintain safety.
Adoption of this resolution will allow for the timely installation of the traffic signal.
(Director of Public Works)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution.
10 A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "E" TO "G" STREETS FOR
THE C1NCO DE MAYO CELEBRATION ON MAY 6, 2001, WAIVING
PROHIBITION OF SIDEWALK SALES, AND WAIVING BUSINESS LICENSE
TAXES FOR DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION AND VENDORS
PARTICIPATING IN THE EVENT
Page 4 - Council Agenda 04/10/01
B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "E" TO "G" STREETS FOR
THE CHULA VISTA THIRD AVENUE LEMON FESTIVAL ON AUGUST 19, 2001,
WAIVING PROHIBITION OF SIDEWALK SALES, AND WAIVING BUSINESS
LICENSE TAXES FOR DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION AND VENDORS
PARTICIPATING IN THE EVENT
C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "D" TO "I" STREETS, "H"
STREET BETWEEN SECOND AND FOURTH AVENUES, AND PORTIONS OF
INTERSECTING STREETS ON DECEMBER 1, 2001, FOR THE 39TH ANNUAL
STARLIGHT YULE PARADE
D. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "E" TO "H" STREETS, PARK
WAY BETWEEN THIRD AND FOURTH AVENUES ON DECEMBER 8, 2001, FOR
THE JINGLE BELL RUN AND WALK
The Chula Vista Downtown Business Association (DBA) is requesting the closure of
Third Avenue and portions of other streets for four 2001 promotional events. For
administrative efficiency purposes, as last year, all street closure events are presented for
Council consideration at one time. (Director of Community Development)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolutions.
11. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
WAIVING THE CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS AS IMPRACTICAL,
APPOINTING THE FIRM OF BEST, BEST, & KR1EGER, LLP AS BOND COUNSEL,
THE FIRM OF STONE & YOUNGBERG, LLC AS UNDERWRITER, AND THE
FIRM OF FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES AS FINANCIAL ADVISOR FOR
ALL LAND-SECURED INFRASTRUCTURE FiNANCING TRANSACTIONS BY
AMENDING THEIR RESPECTIVE AGREEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING AGREEMENTS WITH
THESE FIRMS
The City currently has nine assessment districts and three community facility districts, all
formed for the purpose of financing infrastructure improvements. Stone & Youngberg,
Best, Best, & Kfieger, and Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates are under contract with the
City to serve as underwriter, bond counsel, and financial advisor respectively on all land-
secured infrastructure financing transactions in the Otay Ranch tenitory and Sunbow II.
It is recommended that the existing agreements be amended to include all future
community facility district transactions. (Deputy City Manager Powell)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution.
Page 5 - Council Agenda 04/10/01
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Persons speaking during Oral Communications may address the Council on any
subject matter within the Council's jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the
agenda. State law generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any issue
not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Council may schedule the
topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff Comments are limited to
three minutes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as
required by law. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to
Speak"form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the
meeting.
12. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE SALT CREEK RANCH GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO CHANGE THE LAND
USE DESIGNATION OF A SEVEN-ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD, BETWEEN HUNTE PARKWAY AND
DUNCAN RANCH ROAD FROM LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO
COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY AND PARK; AND THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION OF A THREE-ACRE PARCEL ADJACENT TO THE NORTH,
FROM COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY TO PARK
The applicant, Pacific Bay Homes, has submitted an application to amend the Salt Creek
Ranch (Rolling Hills Ranch) General Development Plan, Sectional Planning Area plan,
and Planned Community District Regulations in order to change the land use designation
of a seven-acre parcel, located on the south side of Proctor Valley Road, between Hunte
Parkway and Duncan Ranch Road at the southerly boundary of Rolling Hills Ranch,
Neighborhood 8, from Low-Density Residential to Community Purpose Facility (CPF)
and Park; and the land-use designation of a three-acre parcel adjacent to the north, from
CPF to Park. (Director of Planning and Building)
Staff recommendation: Council conduct the public heating, adopt the following
resolution and place the ordinance on first reading:
A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE SALT CREEK RANCH GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN
IN ORDER TO CHANGE THE LAND-USE DESIGNATION OF A SEVEN-
ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PROCTOR VALLEY
ROAD, BETWEEN HUNTE PARKWAY AND DUNCAN RANCH ROAD,
FROM LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY PURPOSE
FACILITY AND PARK; AND THE LAND-USE DESIGNATION OF A
THREE-ACRE PARCEL ADJACENT TO THE NORTH FROM COMMUNITY
PURPOSE FACILITY TO PARK
04/10/01
Page 6 - Council Agenda
B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE SALT CREEK RANCH PLANNED
COMMUNITY DISTRICTS REGULATIONS TO CHANGE THE LAND-USE
DESIGNATION OF A SEVEN-ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD, BETWEEN HUNTE PARKWAY AND
DUNCAN RANCH ROAD, FROM LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO
COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY AND PARK; AND THE LAND-USE
DESIGNATION OF A THREE-ACRE PARCEL ADJACENT TO THE NORTH
FROM COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY TO PARK
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial
discussion and deliberation by the Council, staff, or members of the public. The
items will be considered individually by the Council, and staff recommendations
may, in certain cases, be presented in the alternative. If you wish to speak on any
item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and
submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting.
13. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS APPROVING FINAL
MAPS, THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND THE
SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT OF CHULA
VISTA TRACT NO. 92-02, SALT CREEK RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 8, UNITS 1
AND 2, ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA A PORTION
OF DUNCAN RANCH ROAD AND THE VARIOUS PUBLIC EASEMENTS, ALL AS
GRANTED ON SAID MAPS WITHIN SAID SUBDIVISIONS
On October 6, 1992, Council approved the Tentative Subdivision Map for Chula Vista
Tract No. 92-02, Salt Creek Ranch ("Project"). Said Tentative Map was approved based
on certain conditions in which Pacific Bay Properties, A California Corporation
("Developer") agreed to comply with. The neighborhood boundaries were delineated on
said Tentative Map. The Final Maps for Neighborhood 8, Units 1 and 2, and the
Subdivision Improvement Agreements and Supplemental Subdivision Improvement
Agreement for said neighborhood are now before Council for consideration and approval.
It shall be noted that approval of the subject final maps and agreements is contingent
upon the approval of the Salt Creek Ranch SPA plan amendment (Item No. 12).
(Director of Public Works)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the following resolutions:
A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING FINAL MAPS OF CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 92-02, SALT
CREEK RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 8, UNITS 1 AND 2, ACCEPTING ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY A PORTION OF DUNCAN RANCH ROAD AND
THE VARIOUS PUBLIC EASEMENTS, ALL AS GRANTED ON SAID MAPS
WITHIN SAID SUBDIVISIONS, AND APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS FOR THE COMPLETION OF
IMPROVEMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENTS
Page 7 - Council Agenda 04/10/01
B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 92-02, SALT CREEK
RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 8, UNITS 1 AND 2 REQUIRING PACIFIC BAY
HOMES TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNFULFILLED CONDITIONS OF
RESOLUTIONS 16834 AND 2000-190, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
ITEMS PULLED FROM TItE CONSENT CALENDAR
OTHER BUSINESS
14. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
A. Scheduling of meetings.
15. MAYOR'S REPORTS
16. COUNCIL COMMENTS
CLOSED SESSION
17. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
Property: The Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course on Bonita Road and seven
adjacent acres.
Negotiating Parties: City of Chula Vista (Sid Morris, Chris Salomone), American Golf,
County of San Diego, C.W. Clark, Inc. (C.W. Clark), The Phair
Co. (Jeff Phair), Scott Robinson and Chris Bitterlin
Under Negotiation: Purchase price/lease rate and other terms and conditions for
possible disposition of City-owned property and/or lease buy-ont
restructure.
ADJOURNMENT to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on April 17, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. in the
Council Conference Room, and thence to the Regular Meeting of
April 24, 2001, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Page 8 - Council Agenda 04/10/01
CI1Y Of:
CHULA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY A3-rORNEY
Date: April 4, 2001
To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: John M. Kaheny, City Attorney ~JJ
Re: Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session
for the Meeting of 4/3/01
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista met in Closed Session
on 4/3/01 to discuss:
· CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE
TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B):
One case
· CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING INITIATION OF
LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(C):
The city Attorney is authorized to sign an amicus curiae brief in
the case of City of Pomona and Qui Tam Plaintiff Nora Armenta v.
Superior Court of California for County of Los Angeles No. B148045
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista met in Closed
Session on 4/3/01 to discuss:
· CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8:
Property: Assessor Parcel Nos. 568-270-03; 568-270-11
(approximately 2.85 acres located at the southeast
corner of Fourth Avenue and F Street)
Negotiating city Council/Redevelopment Agency (Sid Morris/Chris
Parties: Salomone) and Chula Vista Center (Robert Caplan}
Under:
Negotiations: Price and terms for acquisition.
The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of his knowledge from
observance of actions taken in the Closed Session in which the City
Attorney participated, that there were no reportable actions which
are required under the Brown Act to be reported except for the City
Attorney authorization to sign the above-mentioned amicus brief.
276FOURTHAVENUE. CHU~VISTA- CALIFORNIA 91910.(619)691-~37- FAX(619)~ 4~.582~
ORDINANCE NO. . _~'~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHUL~TA
AMENDING ORDINANCE 1670 RELATIN,(~,~.~ SIGN
PERMIT AND PLAN REVIEW FEES; _/~,I~ENDING
ORDINANCES 2507 AND 2509 RE~I.~G TO PLAN
REVIEW FEES FOR BUILDING ~CHANICAL WORK
RESPECTIVELY; AND ~G CHAPTERS X
(BUILDING AND HOUSING), X~V (PLANNING), AND XV
(FIRE) OF THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, as a result Of a comprehensive review of all fees relating to building,
permitting, inspection and plan check services, staff has recommended proposed fee changes;;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed fee schedule has been developed based on current operations,
development volume and service provision costs and spreads these costs equitably to those
receiving these City services; and
WHEREAS, the proposed changes are supported by the Building Industry Association
and the Board of Appeals and Advisors; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the action will
not have a physical effect on the environment and is an ongoing project of the City and is
therefore exempt from CEQA under Section 15261 (Ongoing Projects); and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1. Findings.
The City Council finds, after consideration of the evidence presented to it, including the
methodology and results of the building fee study, that certain amendments to Ordinance 1670
relating to sign permit and plan review fees and ordinances 2507 and 2509 relating to plan
review fees for building and mechanical work and Chapters X and, XIV and XV of the City's
Master Fee Schedule are necessary in order to assure that fees related to building permitting,
inspections and plan check services provided by the City are actually based on current
operations, development volume and service provision costs and that such costs are applied
equitably to those receiving City services; and,
SECTION 2. Ordinance 1670 is hereby amended by repealing Section 15.52.020 of the
Chula Vista Municipal Code.
SECTION 3: Ordinance 2507 is hereby amended by amending Section 15.08.050 of the
Chula Vista Municipal Code as follows:
Section 15.08.050.
Section 304(c) Plan Review Fees. When a plan or other data are required to be submitted
by Section 302(b), a plan review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting plans and
specificS_or ewew. Smd pl evte shall b w v ..................... e, v .......... as
shown speci~ii~i~the Master Fee Schedule.
SECTION 4:'~nce No. 2509 is hereby amended by amending Section 15.16.050 of
the Chula Vista MuniU~pif~s follows:
Section 15.16.050.
Section 304(c) Plan Review Fee~Y-~en a plan or other data ~e reqmred to e submitted
by Section 302(b), a plm~ review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting plans ~d
specifications for review. The pl~ review fees for mechanical work shall be oqxa! to 25 percent
.......... ~ .......... as ......... specified in the Master Fee Schedule of the City of Chula
Vista. T~ ~, ...... ; .... r~ specified ;-
SECTION 5: Chapters X (Building and Housing), XIV (Planning) and XV (Fire) of the
City's Master Fee Schedule are hereby amended as set fo~h in Attachment A, attached hereto
and inco¢orated herein by reference as if set forth in full,
SECTION 6. All remaining provisions of the Ordinances mended herein shall remain in
hll force and effect until and unless specifically repealed or amended.
SECTION 7: Time limit for protest and.judicial action
~y judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside void or ~ul this ordin~ce
shall be brought within the time period as established by law.
In accord~ce with Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), the ninety day approval period
in which pa~ies may protest begins upon the effective date of this ordin~ce.
SECTION 8: This ordinance shalI become effective sixty (60) days after its adoption.
Presented by Approved as to fotun by
Robert A. Leiter John IgE. T(~d'ieny
Director of Planning and Building City Attorney
H:\home\attomey\rs\sign permit fees.
-?-2
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~/~
Meeting Date 4/i0/01
ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving submittal to SANDAG of two
applications within the Montgomery Annexation area for the Fiscal Year
2001-02 2 % Non- Motorized Transportation Development Act (TDA) and
Transportation Sales Tax (TransNe0 Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Funds
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works~/~//~
tF--
REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~c ,, r' (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
The City of Chula Vista annually submits an updated list of projects for inclusion in the
implementation program of the non-motorized element of the Regional Transportation Improvement
Program. SANDAG regulations require that official applications be submitted to SANDAG in order
for projects to be considered by its Board of Directors for funding. In order for the applications to be
considered, Council must approve a resolution authorizing submittal of the Fiscal Year 2001-02
Non-Motorized Transportation applications for available Transportation Development Act (TDA)
and Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) Funds. Both funding sources form a single fund with
annual allocations totaling approximately $3.2 million for the San Diego region. Projects are chosen
and then approved for funding after the applications have been evaluated by SANDAG's Bicycle-
Pedesrtian Advisory Committee (BPAC).
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve a resolution approving the submittal to SANDAG
of two applications within the Momgomery Annexation area for the Fiscal Year 2001-02 2% Non-
Motorized Transportation Development Act (TDA) and Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) Bicycle
and Pedestrian Project Funds.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
DISCUSSION:
Annually the 2% Non- Motorized Transportation Development Act (TDA) Funds are made available
for the regional planning and construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. TDA funds will
contribute about $2.2 million in FY 2001-02 to the implementation of non-motorized projects in the
San Diego region. Also, with the passage of Proposition A in 1987, an additional $1 million of
TransNet revenues per year is available for the implementation of said projects that are submitted
annually by the Cities and the County. The following is a description of the project applications that
we propose to submit to SANDAG for FY2001-2002 funding:
1. Sidewalk Safety Program, Sidewalk Installation On "L" Street Between Cedar
Avenue And Fifth Avenue, South Side: Installation of sidewalk improvements will
Page 2,Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
increase pedestrian safety and accessibility to the Chula Vista High School, Chula Vista
Elementary School, Chula Vista Boys and Girls Club, and Chula Vista Church of Christ
School. The combination of the schools and other facilities in the area is generating
substantial pedestrian traffic. This project is entirely within the Montgomery Annexation
area and will complete the much needed sidewalk improvements along this section of "L"
Street. Completion of this project will provide a safe walking route for students and other
pedestrians between the various schools, recreational and commercial facilities, and it's
surrounding neighborhood. Total application request is $25,700.
2. Sidewalk Safety Program, Sidewalk Installation On Moss Street West Of Fourth
Avenue, North Side: The project involves the installation of sidewalk improvements to
increase pedestrian safety and accessibility to the Sweetwater School District offices and
Night School. The School District site on Moss Street is generating substantial
pedestrian traffic. This project is entirely within the Montgomery Annexation area and
will install sidewalk only from the existing improvement east of Widgeon Lane to 100
feet west of Kittiwake Lane. In combination with the recently completed sidewalk
improvements on the northwest comer of Moss Street and Fourth Avenue and the
existing curb and gutter improvements in this area, this project will provide a safe
walking route for students and other pedestrians between the schools and surrounding
neighborhood. Total application request is $38,000.00.
The following table shows the total costs for each project.
Project TDA Fund Gas Tax Fund Total
1. Project #1 $25,700 $3,100 $28,800
2. Project #2 $38,000 $2,200 $40,200
Total $63,700 $5,300 $6%000
Project components that are eligible for TDA funding include the removal of existing improvements,
grading work, installation of sidewalk, and pedestrian ramps. Eligible items also include traffic
control, protection and restoration of existing improvements, required drainage improvements, and
contingencies covering design and inspection. Gas Tax contributions will cover the cost of TDA
ineligible TDA items. Gas Tax Funds can be used in the building or rebuilding of streets, roads,
bridges, and acquisitions of right-of-ways or their component parts to a degree that improve traffic
service is provided and geometric or structural improvements are affected including allocated
administration and engineering. This description is based on Section I of Chapter 2 of the guidelines
relating to Gas Tax expenditures, Division of Local Government Fiscal Affairs. The Gas Tax
request will be submitted as part of the CIP review and approval process.
Page 3,Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01~
Projects submitted to SANDAG must meet at least the following criteria:
1. Projects must be consistent with SANDAG's adopted non-motorized plans, and be included
in an adopted regional, county, city or community plan.
2. Ifthe project abuts other jurisdictions, it must be shown on the adopted plans ofthe adjacent
jurisdictions, or a letter must be submitted from the abutting jurisdiction showing that
cooperative efforts are underway
3. Bicycle projects must follow CalTrans Standards as shown in the CalTrans Highway Design
Manual, Section 7-1000 - Bikeway Planning and Design Standards.
4. Pedestrian projects must meet the design requirements ofthe American with Disabilities Act
(ADA).
$. Other sources of funding must be identified.
6. The City Council must approve the projects being submitted for funding.
Projects are also subject to prioritization criteria such as elimination of' safety problem areas on
routes which would provide relatively safe travel use, service to high activity centers (economic,
educational, cultural and recreational) including access to transportation system such as transit
centers, local effort in developing the pedestrian or bicycle project, and connection to and continuity
of longer routes provided by other means (e.g., regional park trails) to improve regional community.
The FY 2001-02 applications will be reviewed by the Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory Committee,
which is composed of representatives from each SANDAG member agency, CalTrans, the region's
transit development boards, and four members from the community at large. Based on the
committee's recommendations, the SANDAG Board of Directors will authorize allocation of the
available TDA and TransNet funds.
A copy of the application package is available in the City Clerk's Office for Council's review.
Third Avenue sidewalk improvements between Orange Avenue and Main Street, TDA Project
Issues:
On May 28, 1993, the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) approved the allocation
ors 120,000 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds to finance the installation of sidewalk
improvements along Third Avenue between Orange Avenue and Main Street. Staff's intention at the
time was to establish additional funding to finance construction of the ultimate improvements and
other items ineligible under the TDA pro~ram. However, after reviewing the project in more detail,
it was determined that this project would require more City funds than were available. The City
Council, during its 1994 budget review process, approved staff's recommendation of constructing
Page 4,Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
asphalt sidewalks since right-of-way issues and cooperation from other property owners were
unattainable. TDA funding was not used since these funds are only for permanent improvements.
On July 1995 a report was forwarded to the City Council on the completion of the interim asphalt
sidewalk project. To date, the east side of Third Avenue now has either concrete or asphalt
sidewalks but the west side is still unimproved since property owners are not willing to dedicate the
right-of-ways.
In 1994, it was estimated that a project that would install concrete sidewalk on both sides of Third
Avenue at ultimate location would cost $1.8 million including the $120,000 TDA fund available.
Based on requests from Council, staff is developing a detailed cost estimate to consider the project in
the upcoming CIP budget. Since this project will most likely cost more than $2 million, staffdoes
not recommend submitting it as a SANDAG project due to the limited amount of that County-wide.
We still have the $120,000 SANDAG funds that could go toward the new project.
FISCAL IMPACT: Potential revenue to the City of approximately $63,700.00 for the two
applications. The actual amount is dependent upon which of the projects is approved for funding by
the SANDAG Board of Directors and the amount they approve. This resolution approves the
submittal of the applications, and does not formally approve the implementation of the projects.
These projects will be submitted for approval in the FY 2001-02 CIP.
Attachments: Two TDA Applications
File: 0690-20-KY036
H:\HOME\ENGINEER~AGENDA\01 A-TDA.DOC
TDA APPLICATION FORM
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Claimant: CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Amount of Claim: $25,650
Length and Type of Project:
Bike Path
Bike Lane
Shared Route
Related Facilities
Sidewalk 380'
Other
Project description:
Sidewalk Safety Program, Sidewalk Installation On "L" Street Between Cedar Avenue And
Fifth Avenue, South Side: Installation of sidewalk improvements will increase pedestrian
safety and accessibility to the Chula Vista Itigh School, Chula Vista Elementary School,
Chula Vista Boys and Girls Club, and Chula Vista Church of Christ School. The
combination of the schools and other facilities in the area is generating substantial pedestrian
traffic. This project will complete the much needed sidewalk improvements along this
section of "L" Street. Completion of this project will provide a safe walking route for
students and other pedestrians between the various schools, recreational and commercial
facilities, and it's surrounding neighborhood.
Note: Please attach location map, project limits, and appropriate cross sections.
I. Project Eligibility (Check and fully explain in comments) Yes No
A. For bicycle projects, is the project included in an adopted N/A
regional, county, city or community plan?
B. If the project abuts other jurisdictions, is it shown on N/A
adopted plans of adjacent jurisdictions?
C. For bicycle projects, does the project follow CalTrans N/A
Bike Route Standards from the Caltrans Highway
Design Manual, Section 7-1000; Bikeway Planning
and Design Standards? If the project exceeds the
design standard, provide a separate justification for ~2 '
any added costs associated with the higher standard.
D. Identify other sources of funding for the cooperative X
projects, and/or specify how the TransNet/TDA-
related costs for this application were determined.
Only the cost necessary for the construction (TDA eligible items) of the sidewalk
is included. Other funding will be obtained from local sources.
II. Status of Project (check and fully explain in comments) Yes No
A. Resolution passed by governing agency N/A
Scheduled for the March 20, 2000 City Council meeting.
B. On adopted Capital Improvement Program X
This project will be included in Chula Vista's CIP Program.
C. Maintenance and liability (Comment on how X
proposed facility will be maintained)
This improvement will be maintained by the City of Chula Vista's Operations
Staff.
III. Proposed Project Schedule (provide dates)
A. Preliminary engineering completed 1ST QTR 01/02
B. Environmental Document approved N/A
C. Final design complete 2ND QTR 01/02
D. Construction begins 3RD QTR 01/02
E. Construction complete 3RD QTR 01/02
IV. Evaluation Criteria (Check and fully explain in coraments) Yes No
A. Does the project eliminate problem areas on routes
that otherwise would provide relatively safe travel?
1. Intersections, driveways X
2. Bridges N/A
3. Narrow road segments X
4. Removal of parking X
5. High traffic volume and speed X
6. Wide crossing distance X
7. Other N/A
This segment currently has a P.C.C. curb and gutter and dirt walkway with some
vegetation. The pedestrians are forced to walk on the street during rainy days, as
this area gets too muddy. This project will provide a safer path away from the
street.
B. Does the project provide service to high activity centers? Yes No
8. Employment X
9. Commercial X
10. Educational X
11. Public transportation interface X
12. Government or social service centers X
13. Cultural or recreational X
14. Other X
This project is primarily intended to provide a safer route for students and other
pedestrians between the various schools, recreational and commercial facilities,
and the neighborhood in the vicinity.
C. Does the project provide connection to and continuity Yes No
of longer routes?
15. Inter-regional X
16. Regional X
17. Inter-jurisdictional X
18. Local X
19. Community X
D. Describe the current and future contributions of local resources toward the project:
This project, Sidewalk Safety Program, an annual City safety program, is
currently in the CIP program with proposed TDA and GAS Tax funding. The
preliminary engineering and design phase is proposed for second quarter of FY
01/02. The final phase, consisting of the final design and construction will start
as soon as additional funding (TDA) can be met.
E. Special Circumstances:
The City is investing Gas Tax funding into this project and is fully committed to
completing this project. This project, which has been in the Sidewalk Safety
Program, will increase pedestrian safety and will provide a safer walking route
for students and other pedestrians between the school district facilities and the
surrounding neighborhoods.
H :\HOME\ENGINEER\ADVPLAN\TDA\TDA2001 App#2.doc
Date: February 28, 2000
ESTIMATE OF BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN PROJECT COSTS
Project Name: "L" Street Sidewalk Improvement Length: 380 ft Miles
Construction Costs
1. Earthwork a. Roadway Excavation C.Y. X $ = $ 0.00
b. Embankment C.Y. X $ = $ 0.00
~ 0.00
2. Drainage - Major Work
Describe:
$ 0.00
3. Signing, Striping, Pavement Markings
Signs (8/mile) = $1,000/MJle!
Stripe · ~3,000 /Mile X Miles= $ 0.00
Markings 320 S.F./Mile $500/Mile
4. Paving a. Agg. Base 0,00 C.Y, X ~ /C.Y.- $ 0.00
calc: length x width x depth + 27 = C.Y.
0,00
b. Paving 0,00 Tons X $ /Ton = (~ 0.00
calc: length x width x depth + 27 X 2 = Tons
0.00
PAVING TOTAL ~ 0.00
5. Bridge Work a. Modify Bridge S.F. X $ /S.F, = $ 0.00
b, New Bridge S.F. X ~ /S.F. = ~ 0.00
BRIDGE TOTAL $ 0,00
8. Fencing L.F. X $ /L.F. = $ 0.00
7. Storage a. Racks ea. X $ = O.OO
b, Lockers ea. X $ = O.OO
8 Sidewalk
Cost per square foot $ 4~50 X 1,6OO SF = 8 7,200.00
9. Ped Ramps No. of Ramps 1 X ~ 1,500.O0 /ramp = $ 1,500.OO
10. Other (Specify and identify unit costs if appropriate + B25)
a. Removal and Disposal $ 3,000.00
b. Excavation and Grading $ 2,500.00
c. Sidewalk Portion of Driveway Approach (4ea, 15'x5@ ~6.00 per sq.ft.) $ 1,800.O0
d. Protection and Restoration $ 2,000.00
e. Traffic Control $ 1,000.00
11. Construction Subtotal $ 19,000.00
03/02/2001
Construction Subtotal (~ 19,000.00
Construction Contingencies (10% of construction subtotal)
919,000.00 X 10% = ~ 1,900.00
Construction Inspection (10% of construction subtotal)
$19,000.00 X 10% = ~ 1,900.00
12. CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 22,800.00
Non-Construction Costs
13. Design Engineering (15% of Construction Subtotal, line 11 ) $ 2,850.00
14. Environmental Document/Permits $ 0.00
15. PROJECT TOTAL $ 25,650.00
16. Less Other Revenue Sources (Specify)
Previous TDA $ ( )
Previous TransNet $ ( )
~( )
9( )
9( )
17. CLAIM AMOUNT 8 25,650.00
18.Cost detail not shown above. Use to explain special circumstances such as deviations from suggested
percentage or unit costs. Do not a~tach additional sheets.
03/02/2001
¥-to
TDA APPLICATION FORM
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Claimant: CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Amount of Claim: $37,935
Length and Type of Project:
Bike Path
Bike Lane
Shared Route
Related Facilities
Sidewalk 450'
Other
Project description:
Sidewalk Safety Program, Sidewalk Installation On Moss Street West Of Fourth Avenue,
North Side: Installation of sidewalk improvements will increase pedestrian safety and
accessibility to the Sweetwater School District offices and Night School. The School District
site on Moss Street is generating substantial pedestrian traffic. In combination with the
recently completed sidewalk improvements on the northwest corner of Moss Street and
Fourth Avenue and the existing curb and gutter improvements in this area, this project will
provide a safe walking route for students and other pedestrians between the schools and
surrounding neighborhood.
Note: Please attach location map, project limits, and appropriate cross sections.
I. Project Eligibility (Check and fully explain in comments) Yes No
A. For bicycle projects, is the project included in an adopted N/A
regional, county, city or community plan?
B. If the project abuts other jurisdictions, is it shown on N/A
adopted plans of adjacent jurisdictions?
C. For bicycle projects, does the project follow CalTrans N/A
Bike Route Standards from the Caltrans Highway
Design Manual, Section 7-1000; Bikeway Planning
and Design Standards? If the project exceeds the
design standard, provide a separate justification for
any added costs associated with the higher standard.
D. Identify other sources of funding for the cooperative X
projects, and/or specify how the TransNet/TDA-
related costs for this application were determined.
Only the cost necessary for the construction (TDA eligible items) of the sidewalk
is included. Other funding will be obtained from local sources.
II. Status of Project (check and fully explain in comments) Yes No
A. Resolution passed by governing agency N/A
Scheduled for the March 20, 2000 City Council meeting.
B. On adopted Capital Improvement Program X
This project will be included in Chula Vista's CIP Program.
C. Maintenance and liability (Comment on how X
proposed facility will be maintained)
This improvement will be maintained by the City of Chula Vista's Operations
Staff.
III. Proposed Project Schedule (provide dates)
A. Preliminary engineering completed 1ST QTR 01/02
B. Environmental Document approved N/A
C. Final design complete 2ND QTR 01/02
D. Construction begins 3RD QTR 01/02
E. Construction complete 3RD QTR 01/02
IV. Evaluation Criteria (Check and fully explain in comments) Yes No
A. Does the project eliminate problem areas on routes
that otherwise would provide relatively safe travel?
1. Intersections, driveways X
2. Bridges N/A
3. Narrow road segments X
4. Removal of parking X
5. High traffic volume and speed X
6. Wide crossing distance X
7. Other N/A
This segment currently has a P.C.C. curb and gutter and dirt walkway with some
vegetation. The pedestrians are forced to walk on the street during rainy days, as
this area gets too muddy. This project will provide a safer path away from the
street.
B. Does the project provide service to high activity centers? Yes No
8. Employment X
9. Commercial X
10. Educational X
11. Public transportation interface X
12. Government or social service centers X
13. Cultural or recreational X
14. Other X
This project is primarily intended to provide a safer route for students and other
pedestrians between the school district facilities and the neighborhood in the
vicinity.
C. Does the project provide connection to and continuity Yes No
of longer routes?
15. Inter-regional X
16. Regional X
17. Inter-jurisdictional X
18. Local X
19. Community X
D. Describe the current and future contributions of local resources toward the project:
This project, Sidewalk Safety Program, an annual City safety program, is
currently in the CIP program with proposed TDA and GAS Tax funding. The
preliminary engineering and design phase is proposed for second quarter of FY
01/02. The final phase, consisting of the final design and construction will start
as soon as additional funding (TDA) can be met.
E. Special Circumstances:
The City is investing Gas Tax funding into this project and is fully committed to
completing this project. This project, which has been in the Sidewalk Safety
Program, will increase pedestrian safety and will provide a safer walking route
for students and other pedestrians between the school district facilities and the
surrounding neighborhoods.
H:\HOME\ENGINEER~ADVPLAN\TDA\TDA2001 App# l.doc
Date: February 28, 2000
ESTIMATE OF BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN PROJECT COSTS
Project Name: Moss Street Sidewalk Improvement Length: 450 ft Miles
Construction Costs
1. Earthwork a. Roadway Excavation C.Y. X $ = $ 0.00
b. Embankment C.Y. X $ -- $ 0.00
$ 0.00
2. Drainage - Major Work
Describe:
$ 0.00
3. Signing, Striping, Pavement Markings
Signs (8/mile) = $1,000/Mile!
Stripe $1,500/Milei/ ~ $3,000 /Mile X Miles= $ 0.00
Markings 320 S.F./Mire $500/Mile I
4. Paving a. Agg. Base O.00 C.Y. X $ /C.Y. = $ 0.00
calc: length x width x depth + 27 = C~)Y.~)O
b. Paving 0.00 Tons X $ /Ton = $ 0.OO
calc: length x width x depth + 27 X 2 Tons
O.00
PAVING TOTAL $ 0.00
5. Bridge Work a. Modify Bridge S.F. X $ /S.F. = $ 0.OO
b. New Bridge S.F. X $ /S.F. = $ 0.00
BRIDGE TOTAL $ 0.00
6. Fencing L.F. X $ /LF. = 8 0.00
7. Storage a. Racks ea. X $ = O.00
b. Lockers ea. X $ = O.O0
8 Sidewalk
Cost per square foot $ 4.50 X 2,100 SF = $ 9,450.00
9. Ped Ramps No. of Ramps 4 X 8 1,500.00 /ramp = $ 6,000.00
10. Other (Specify and identify unit costs if appropriate)
a. Removal and Disposal ~ 3,000.00
b. Excavation and Grading $ 2,500.00
c. Sidewalk Portion of Driveway Approach (2ea, 15'x5@ 96.00 per sq.ft.) $ 900.00
d. Fire Hydrant Relocation $ 3,500.00
e. Protection and Restoration $ 1,750.00
f. Traffic Control $ 1,000.00
11. Construction Subtotal $ 28,100.00
03/02/2001
Construction Subtotal $ 28,100.00
Construction Contingencies (10% of construction subtotal)
$28,100.00 X10% = $ 2,810.00
Construction Inspection (10% of construction subtotal)
$28,100.00 X 10% = $ 2,810.00
12. CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 33,720.00
Non-Construction
13. Design Engineering (15% of Construction Subtotal, line 11 ) ~ 4,215.00
14. Environmental Document/Permits $ 0.00
15. PROJECT TOTAL $ 37,935.00
16. Less Other Revenue Sources (Specify)
Previous TDA $ ( )
Previous TransNet $ ( )
$( )
)
17~ CLAIM AMOUNT $ 37,935.00
18. Cost detail not shown above. Use to explain special circumstances such as deviations from suggested
percentage or unit costs. Do not attach additional sheets.
03/02/2001
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL TO SANDAG OF TWO
~PPLICATIONS WITHIN THE MONTGOMERY ANNEXATION AREA
FOR THE FY 2001-02 2% NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) AND TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX
(TRANSNET) BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECT FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista annually submits an
updated list of projects for inclusion in the implementation
program of the non-motorized element of the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, SANDAG regulations require that official
applications be submitted to SANDAG in order for projects to be
considered by its Board of Directors for funding; and
WHEREAS, in order for the application to be official,
Council must approve a resolution authorizing submittal of the FY
2001-02 2% Non-Motorized Project applications for available
Transportation Development Act and Transportation Sales Tax
(TransNet) Funds; and
WHEREAS, the following is a description o~ the project
applications to be submitted:
Sidewalk Safety Program, Sidewalk Installation
on "L" Street between Cedar Avenue and Fifth Avenue,
South Side: Installation of sidewalk improvements will
increase pedestrian safety and accessibility to the Chula
Vista High School. Total application request is
$25,700.
Sidewalk Safety Program, Sidewalk Installation on Moss
Street west of Fourth Avenue: The project involves the
installation of sidewalk improvements to increase
pedestrian safety and accessibility to the Sweetwater
School District offices and Night School. Total
application request is $38,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the submittal to SANDAG
of two applications for Fiscal Year 2001-02 2% Non-Motorized
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Fund and Transportation Sales
Tax (TransNet) Bicycle and Pedestrian Project funds.
Presented by Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt ~'M. Kaheny ~/ J
Director of Public Works /C~y Attorney~-~
H:\home~attorney~reso\2% NO~OTORIZED TDA
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving Final "B" Maps for Chula Vista Tract No.
96-04, Otay Ranch SPA One, Village 5, Neighborhoods R-28, R-32A and R-
33; accepting on behalf of the City of Chula Vista the assignable and
irrevocable general utility and access easements, the sewer easement, the wall
easement and the sight visibility easement granted on said maps; approving
three "B" Map Subdivision Improvement Agreements; and authorizing the
Mayor to execute said agreements.
Resolution Approving the Supplemental Subdivision Improvement
Agreement for Village 5 Neighborhoods R-28, R-32A and R-33 of the Otay
Ranch Project and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Work~{~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~'1~ ~¢' (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
Tonight, Council will consider the approval of Final "B" Maps for Neighborhood R-28, R-32A and R-
33 of Otay Ranch Village 5 (CVT 96-04) and associated agreements. Otay Project, L.P is the current
owner of the properties. On April 20, 1999, Council approved the "Agreement for Financing and
Construction of Olympic Parkway and Related Roadway Improvements". The approval of the subject
Final Maps comply with the development thresholds established by the Olympic Parkway Agreement.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the following:
1) Resolution approving Final "B" Maps for Village5NeighborhoodR-28, R-32AandR-33ofthe
Otay Ranch Project and associated Subdivision Improvement Agreements, and
2) Resolution approving the Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Village 5
Neighborhoods R-28, R-32A and R-33 of the Otay Ranch Project.
DISCUSSION:
On November 19, 1996, by Resolution No. 18398, Council approved the tentative map for Otay Ranch,
Village 1 and a portion of Village 5 (CVT 96-04). On January 23, 2001, by Resolution Nos. 2001-018,
Council approved the Otay Ranch Village Five "A" Map No. 3. The "A" Map created the
"superblock" lots corresponding to Neighborhoods R-28, R-32A and R-33. Tonight, Council will
consider approving the three Final "B" Maps and associated agreements for these maps.
Final Maps and Subdivision Improvement Agreements
The land to be subdivided by the subject Final "B" Maps is generally located south of Otay Lakes Road
across from the Telegraph Canyon Estates subdivision and west of Phase 1 of Village 5. The Final "B"
Map for each neighborhood consists of the following:
Page 2, Item __
Meeting Date: 4/10/01
Number of Single Number of Private Total Final Map
Final Map Family Units Streets & Open Space Acreage
Neighborhood R-28 73 14 9.983
Neighborhood R-32A 61 9 10.951
Neighborhood R-33 42 6 9.810
TOTALS 176 29 30.744
The private open space lots and the private streets will all be maintained by a Homeowner's Association.
A plat and location map of the subdivisions is attached herewith as Attachment 1.
Staff has determined that the proposed maps and associated agreements comply with all conditions of
approval of the Tentative Map and recommends approval by Council. Approval of the subject maps
constitutes acceptance by the City of all assignable and irrevocable general access and utility easements,
the sewer easement, the wall easements and the sight visibility easement granted on the maps. The fees
and/or cash deposits which are specific to each Final "B" Map have been collected in satisfaction of the
various Tentative Map conditions of approval and Code requirements.
The Owner has also executed a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for each map and has
provided bonds to guarantee construction of the required onsite public improvements and to guarantee
the subdivision monumentation. The SIA's are on file in the office of the City Clerk. The construction
and bonding of all oft-site street improvements serving the subject map has been addressed in the
Olympic Parkway Agreement.
Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement
The Owner has also executed a Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SSIA),
encompassing the proposed map, to satisfy Conditions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 27, 31, 36,
50, 52, 65, 83, 84(e), 90, 103, 104, 108, 120, 128, 130, 131, 132, 133, 136, 137, 138, 140 and 152 of
Resolution No. 18398. All the conditions are addressed using typical language used in previous
agreements. Staff has reviewed the SSIA and determined that it satisfies all the applicable tentative map
conditions for Final Map approval and recommends Council approval.
Environmental Review
The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the Final Maps and has determined that they
are in substantial conformance with the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) Program EIR 90-
01, SPA One EIR 95-01, subsequent amended SPA One Plan EIR 97-03 and other related environmental
documents and that the Final Maps will not result in any new environmental effects that were not
previously identified, nor would the Final Maps result in a substantial increase in severity in any impacts
previously identified.
Page 3, Item __
Meeting Date: 4/10/01
The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed agreements and has approved them as to form. The
Developer's disclosure statement is attached as Attachment 2.
FISCAL IMPACT: None. The Developer has paid all costs associated with the Final "B" Maps and
agreements.
Attachments:
Attachmem 1: Plat - Chula Vista Tract 96-04, Otay Ranch SPA One, Village 5, Neighborhoods R-
28, R-32A and R-33
Attachment 2: Developer's Disclosure Statement
H:\HOME\ENGINEER\LANDDEV\OTAYRNCH\A113V5 R28, R32A and R33-tme.doc
File No. 0600-80 ORI77F, OR176F and ORI78F
"['tt.E CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEIVI:ENT
Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to an)' action upon matters which will require discretionary action by the Council,
Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the City, a statement of dhclosur¢ of certain ownership or financial
interests, payments, or ¢~,rapaign contr~utions for a City of Chub ¥ista election must be filed. The following information
must be disclosed:
1. List ihe naraes of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subject of the application or the
contract, e.g., owner, appllcant, conwactor, subcontractor, material supplier,
Otav Pro~ ~et
2. If any person* identified pursuant ~o (1) above is a corporation or parmership, list the names of all ind/viduals with
a $1000 investment in the business (corP0raflon/parmership) entity.
J/~ B aldw~n
3. If any person* identified pursuam to (1) above is a non-profit orE*nlz=tion or trust, list the names of any p~rson
serving as direewr of thc non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
4. Please identify every person, including any agents, employees, consulm, nts, or independent contractors :you have
assigned to represent you before the City in this matter? .....
Jim Baldwin w~n~ ~a~n
A1 Baldwin Ranle Hunter
Kim Kilkenny Chuck Cater
5, Has any person* associated with this contrac~ had any financial dealings with an official*~ of the City of Chula
Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months. Yes' No .v..
If Yes, briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official'~' my have in this contract7
6. Have you made a contribution of more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the.
Chub Vista City Council? No X Yes ~ If yes. which Council member?
7. Have you or a~y member of your governing board (i.e. Corporat~ Board of Directors/Y-xccu6ves, non-profit Board
of Dixectors made con~ributiom totaling more than $1,000 over the past four (4) years to a currcm member of thc
Chula Vista City Council? Yes No X
If Yes, which Council member?
8. Have you provided more than $300 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official**'qf the City of Chub Vista ia
thc past twelve (12) months9 (This includes b~ing a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, otc.)
Yes No ~
If Yes, which official** and what was the hatur¢ of item provided?
Signature of Contractor/Applicant
Print or type name of ,Contractor/Applicant_ ....
Person is cl~flncd as: any individual, fu-m, co-parmership, joi~t v~ntur¢, association, social dub, fraternal org~,,i?~tion,
corporation, estate. Wast, zeceiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, dlsu'ict, or other political su~divialon, -or
any other group or combination acting as a unit.
Official includes, but is not'limited to: Mayer. Council member, Pl.--i-g Co,~,~issioner, Member of e board, commission,
or ce'~iuee of the City, ~mployee, or staff members.
H:~OMI~..NOINEFa'~,.DM~hCONTRAeT~s'rL~200.Z3 ('Boiler MY ~--- ~t~
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING FINAL "B" MAP FOR CHULA
VISTA TRACT NO. 96-04. OTAY RANCH SPA ONE,
VILLAGE 5, NEIGHBORHOOD R-28; R-32A AND R-33,
ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
THE ASSIGNABLE AlCD IRREVOCD~BLE GENERAL UTILITY
AND ACCESS EASEMENTS, THE SEWER EASEMENT, AND
WALL EASEMENTS GRANTED ON SAID MAPS; APPROVING
THREE "B" MAP SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista hereby finds that certain map survey
entitled Chula Vista TRACT No. 96-04 OTAY RANCH SPA ONE, VILLAGE 5,
NEIGHBORHOOD R-28, and more particularly described as follows:
Being a subdivision of Lot 8 of Chula Vista
Tract 96-04 of Otay Ranch Village 5 '' A" Map
No. 3, as shown on Map No. 14147, in the City
of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of
California, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County on February 20,
2001.
Area: 9.983 Acres No. of Lots: 87
Numbered Lots: 73 Lettered Lots: 14
is made in the manner and form prescribed by law and conforms to
the surrounding surveys; and that said map and subdivision of land
shown thereon is hereby approved and accepted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Council hereby accepts
on behalf of the public the Assignable and Irrevocable General
Utility and Access Easements, and the wall easement, all as shown
on said map within this subdivision.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of
Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to endorse upon said
map the action of said Council; that said Council has approved said
subdivision map; and that the wall easements and Assignable and
Irrevocable General Utility and Access Easement, as granted thereon
1
and shown on said map within said subdivision, are accepted on
behalf of the City of Chula Vista as herein above stated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby
directed to transmit said map to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of San DieHo.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that that certain Subdivision
Improvement AHreement dated the __ day of ___, 2001, for the
completion of improvements in said subdivision, a copy of which is
on file in the office of the City Clerk, is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Chula Vista hereby finds that certain map survey entitled Chula
Vista TP~ACT No. 96-04 OTAY RANCH SPA ONE, VILLAGE 5, NEIGHBORHOOD
R-32A, and more particularly described as follows:
Being a subdivision of Lot 6 of Chula Vista
Tract 96-04 of Otay Ranch Village 5 "A" Map
No. 3, as shown on Map No. 14147, in the City
of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of
California, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San DieHo County on February 20,
2001.
Area: 10.951 Acres No. of Lots: 70
Numbered Lots: 61 Lettered Lots: 9
is made in the manner and form prescribed by law and conforms to
the surrounding surveys; and that said map and subdivision of land
shown thereon is hereby approved and accepted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Council hereby accepts
on behalf of the public the Assignable and Irrevocable General
Utility and Access Easements, and the sewer easement, all as shown
on said map within this subdivision.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of
Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to endorse upon said
map the action of said Council; that said Council has approved said
subdivision map and Assignable and Irrevocable General Utility and
Access Easement and sewer easement, as granted thereon and shown on
said map within said subdivision, are accepted on behalf of the
City of Chula vista as herein above stated.
2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby
directed to transmit said map to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of San Diego.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that that certain Subdivision
Improvement Agreement dated the __ day of __, 2001, for the
completion of improvements in said subdivision, a copy of which is
on file in the office of the City Clerk, is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Chula Vista hereby finds that certain map survey entitled Chula
Vista TRACT No. 96-04 OTAY RANCH SPA ONE, VILLAGE 5, NEIGHBORHOOD
R-33, and more particularly described as follows:
Being a subdivision of Lot 1 of Chula Vista
Tract 96-04 of Otay Ranch Village 5 '~ A" Map
No. 3, as shown on Map No. 14147, in the City
of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of
California, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County on February 20,
2001.
Area: 9.810 Acres No. of Lots: 48
Numbered Lots: 42 Lettered Lots: 6
is made in the manner and form prescribed by law and conforms to
the surrounding surveys; and that said map and subdivision of land
shown thereon is hereby approved and accepted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Council hereby accepts
on behalf of the public the Assignable and Irrevocable General
Utility and Access Easements, and wall easement, all as shown on
said map within this subdivision.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of
Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to endorse upon said
map the action of said Council; that said Council has approved said
subdivision map and the Assignable and Irrevocable General Utility
and Access Easement and wall easement, as granted thereon and shown
on said map within said subdivision, are accepted on behalf of the
City of Chula Vista as herein above stated.
3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby
directed to transmit said map to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of San Diego.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that that certain Subdivision
Improvement Agreement dated the day of , 2001, for the
completion of improvements in said subdivision, a copy of which is
on file in the office of the City Clerk, is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula Vista be and is hereby authorized to execute said agreements
for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
Presented by Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt JohnV~.~ ~aheny
Director of Public Works City Attorney
H: \Home~Attorney~RESO~OtayRanchVlg5 .R-28, 32, 33
4
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUPPLEMENTAL
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR VILLAGE
5, NEIGHBORHOODS R-28, R-32A AND R-33 OF THE
OTAY RANCH PROJECT, REQUIRING DEVELOPER TO
COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNFULFILLED CONDITIONS OF
RESOLUTION NO. 18398 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the developer has executed a Supplemental
Subdivision Improvement Agreement to satisfy remaining conditions
of City Council Resolution No. 18398.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the Supplemental
Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Village 5, Neighborhood R-28,
R-32A and R-33 of the Otay Ranch Project, a copy of which shall be
kept on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula Vista is hereby authorized to execute said Agreement on
behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
Presented by Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt ~ohnY~/K~e~y
Director of Public Works City Attorney
IH/HOME',ATTORN EY/RES O/ssia OR R-28, 32 & 33 (March 30, 2001 (3:26PM)]
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving a Final "B" Map for Chula Vista Tract No.
96-04, Otay Ranch SPA One, Village 5, Neighborhood R-29; vacating on
behalf of the City certain existing general utility and access easements,
accepting on behalf of the City of Chula Vista the assignable and irrevocable
general utility and access easement, the sewer easement and the wall easement
granted on said map; approving a "B" Map Subdivision Improvement
Agreement; and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement.
Resolution Approving the Supplemental Subdivision Improvement
Agreement for Village 5 Neighborhood R-29 of the Otay Ranch Project and
authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works~~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager 0~' (4/5tbs Vote: Yes No X )
Tonight, Council will consider the approval of the Final "B" Map for Neighborhood R-29 of Otay
Ranch Village 5 (CVT 96-04) and associated agreements. Otay R-29, LLC is the current owner and
developer of this property. On April 20, 1999, Council approved the "Agreement for Financing and
Construction of Olympic Parkway and Related Roadway Improvements". The approval of the subject
Final Map complies with the development thresholds established by the Olympic Parkway Agreement.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the following:
1) Resolution approving a Final "B" Map for Village 5 Neighborhood R-29 of the Otay Ranch
Project and associated Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and
2) Resolution approving the Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement Village 5
Neighborhood R-29 of the Otay Ranch Project.
DISCUSSION:
On November 19, 1996, by Resolution No. 18398, Council approved the tentative map for Otay Ranch,
Village 1 and a portion of Village 5 (CVT 96-04). On January 23, 2001, by Resolution Nos. 2001-018,
Council approved the Otay Ranch Village Five "A" Map No. 3 (Map No. 14147). The Final "A" Map
created the "superblock" lot corresponding to Neighborhood R-29. Tonight, Council will consider
approving the Final "B" Map and associated agreements for this map.
Final Maps and Subdivision Improvement Agreements
The land to be subdivided by the subject Final "B" Map is generally located south of Otay Lakes Road
across from the Telegraph Canyon Estates subdivision and west of Phase 1 of Village 5. The Final "B"
Map consists of the following:
Page 2, Item __
Meeting Date: 4/10/01
Number of Single Number of Private Streets & Total Final Map
Family Units Open Space Acreage
83 20 9.452
The private open space lots and the private streets will all be maintained by a Homeowner's Association.
A plat and location map of the subdivision is attached herewith as Attachment 1.
Staff has determined that the proposed map and associated agreements comply with all conditions of
approval of the Tentative Map and recommends approval by Council. Approval of the subject map
constitutes acceptance by the City of all assignable and irrevocable general access and utility easements,
the sewer easement and the wall easement granted on the map. The fees and/or cash deposits which are
specific to the Final "B" map have been collected in satisfaction of the various Tentative Map conditions
of approval and Code requirements.
Approval of the proposed map will also constitute the vacation of a general utility and access easement
granted on Map No. 14147. This easement will be replaced by a revised general utility and access
easements proposed by the subject Final "B" Map.
The Developer has also executed a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for the map and has
provided bonds to guarantee construction of the required onsite public improvements and to guarantee
the subdivision monumentation. The SIA is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The construction and
bonding of all off-site street improvements serving the subject map has been addressed in the Olympic
Parkway Agreement.
Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement
The Developer has also executed a Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SSIA),
encompassing the proposed map, to satisfy Conditions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 27, 31, 36,
50, 52, 65, 83, 84(e), 90, 103, 104, 108, 120, 128, 130, 131, 132, 136, 137, 138, 140 and 152 of Resolution
No. 18398. All the conditions are addressed using typical language used in previous agreements. Staff has
reviewed the SSIA and determined that it satisfies all the applicable tentative map conditions for final map
approval and recommends Council approval.
Environmental Review
The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the Final Map and has determined that they
are in substantial conformance with the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) Program EIR 90-
01, SPA One EIR 95-01, subsequent amended SPA One Plan EIR 97-03 and other related environmental
documents and that the Final Map will not result in any new environmental effects that were not previously
identified, nor would the Final Map result in a substantial increase in severity in any impacts previously
identified.
The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed agreements and has approved them as to form. The
Developer's disclosure statement is attached as Attachment 2.
Page 3, Item __
Meeting Date: 4/10/01
FISCAL IMPACT: None. The Developer has paid all costs associated with the Final "B" Map and
agreements.
Attachments:
Attachment 1: Plat - Chula Vista Tract 96-04, Otay Ranch SPA One, Village 5, Neighborhood R-29
Attachment 2: Developer's Disclosure Statement
H:\HOME\ENGINEER\LANDDEV\OTAYRNCH\AI 13V5 R29-nne.doc
File No. 0600-80-OR183F
Page 2, Item __
Meeting Date: 4/10/01
Number of Single Number of Private Streets & Total Final Map
Family Units Open Space Acreage
83 20 9.452
The private open space lots and the private streets will all be maintained by a Homeowner's Association.
A plat and location map of the subdivision is attached herewith as Attachment 1.
Staff has determined that the proposed map and associated agreements comply with all conditions of
approval of the Tentative Map and recommends approval by Council. Approval of the subject map
constitutes acceptance by the City of all assignable and irrevocable general access and utility easements,
the sewer easement and the wall easement granted on the map. The fees and/or cash deposits which are
specific to the Final "B" map have been collected in satisfaction of the various Tentative Map conditions
of approval and Code requirements.
Approval of the proposed map will also constitute the vacation ora general utility and access easement
granted on Map No. 14147. This easement will be replaced by a revised general utility and access
easements proposed by the subject Final "B" Map.
The Developer has also executed a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for the map and has
provided bonds to guarantee construction of the required onsite public improvements and to guarantee
the subdivision monumentation. The SIA is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The construction and
bonding of all off-site street improvements serving the subject map has been addressed in the Olympic
Parkway Agreement.
Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement
The Developer has also executed a Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SSIA),
encompassing the proposed map, to satisfy Conditions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 27, 31, 36,
50, 52, 65, 83, 84(e), 90, 103, 104, 108, 120, 128, 130, 131, 132, 133, 136, 137, 138, 140 and 152 of
Resolution No. 18398. All the conditions are addressed using typical language used in previous
agreements. Staffhas reviewed the SSIA and determined that it satisfies all the applicable tentative map
conditions for final map approval and recommends Council approval.
Environmental Review
The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the Final Map and has determined that they
are in substantial conformance with the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) Program EIR 90-
01, SPA One EIR 95-01, subsequent amended SPA One Plan EIR 97-03 and other related environmental
documents and that the Final Map will not result in any new environmental effects that were not previously
identified, nor would the Final Map result in a substantial increase in severity in any impacts previously
identified.
The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed agreements and has approved them as to form. The
Developer's disclosure statement is attached as Attachment 2.
Page 3, Item __
Meeting Date: 4/10/01
FISCAL IMPACT: None. The Developer has paid all costs associated with the Final "B" Map and
agreements.
Attachments:
Attachmem 1: Plat - Chula Vista Tract 96-04, Otay Ranch SPA One, Village 5, Neighborhood R-29
Attachment 2: Developer's Disclosure Statement
H:\HOME\ENGINEER\LANDDEV\OTAYRNCH\A113V5 R29 tme.doc
File No. 0600-80-OR183F
CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 96-04
OTAY RANCH
VII.I.&GE 5 NEIGHBORHOOD R-29
LOT "A "
LOT "B"
2
4
6 ~ LOT
?
12 1 1 REMAINDER
HUNSAKER ~ "~
& ASSOCIATES
__02/27/01 TUE 15:12 FAX 619 691 5171 CHULA VISTA ENGINEERING ~002
CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters which will requ/re discretionary action
by the Council, Planning Commission and all otl'mr official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of
certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista
election must be filed. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subject of thc
application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier.
William Lyon Homes, Inc.
2. If any person* identified pursuant to (l) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals with a $1000 investmgnt in the business (corporation/partnership) entity.
N/A
3. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the 'names of
any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of
the trust.
4. Please id~ti~ eve~ person, includ~g any ~en~, employees, consultants, or independ~t
con~actorsyouhaveassignedtorepresentyoubeforetheCityinthisma~.
Mel Mercado - William Lyon
A~lisa Vialpando - Hunsaker
Rick Lien - Barbara Harris Permitting
02/27/01 TUE 15:12 FAX 619 6~1 $171 CHULA VISTA ENGINEERING 9003
$. Has any person* a~sociatod with this contract had any financial dealings with aa official** of the
City of Chula Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months? Yes. No X
If Ye% briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official** may have in this contract.
6. Have you made a contribution of more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current
member of the Chula Vista Cit~ Council'? Yes NO X If Yes, which Cotmeil member?
7. Have you or any member of your governing board (i.e, Corporate Board of Directors/Executives,
non-profit Board of Directors made contributions totaling mom than $1,000 over the past fOUr (4)
years to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council? Yes _No x If Yes, which
Council member?
8. Have you provided more than $300 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official** of the City of
Chula Vista in thc past twelve (12) months? (This includes being a source of income, money to
retire a legal deb~, giil, loan, etc.) Yes __ No x If Yes, which official*~' and what was the
nature of item provided?
Co ctor/ plicant
Melvin J. Mercado
Print or type nem¢ of Contractor/Applicant
* Person is defined as: any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club,
fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality,
district, or other political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit.
** Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, Council member, Plaaaning Commissioner, Member
o£ a board, commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staff raembers,
H:LI-IOME~NGINEERkADMI~CONTRACTkD ISCLO S E.DOC
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING FINAL "B" MAP FOR CHULA
VISTA TP~ACT NO. 96-04. OTAY PJ~NCH SPA ONE,
VILLAGE 5, NEIGHBORHOOD R-29; ACCEPTING ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE
ASSIGNABLE AND IRREVOCABLE GENERAL UTILITY AND
ACCESS EASEMENT, THE SEWER EASEMENT, AND WALL
EASEMENT GRANTED ON SAID MAPS; APPROVING A
"B" MAP SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista hereby finds that certain map survey
entitled Chula Vista TRACT No. 96-04 OTAY RANCH SPA ONE, VILLAGE 5,
NEIGHBORHOOD R-29, and more particularly described as follows:
Being a subdivision of Lot 9 of Chula Vista
Tract 96-04 of Otay Ranch Village 5 ~ A" Map
No. 3, as shown on Map No. 14147, in the City
of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of
California, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County on February 20,
2001.
Area: 9.452 Acres No. of Lots: 103
Numbered Lots: 83 Lettered Lots: 20
is made in the manner and form prescribed by law and conforms to
the surrounding surveys; and that said map and subdivision of land
shown thereon is hereby approved and accepted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Council hereby accepts
on behalf of the public the Assignable and Irrevocable General
Utility and Access Easement, the sewer easement and wall easement,
all as shown on said map within this subdivision.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of
Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to endorse upon said
map the action of said Council; that said Council has approved said
subdivision map; and the sewer easement, wall easement and
Assignable and Irrevocable General Utility and Access Easement, as
1
granted thereon and shown on said map within said subdivision, are
accepted on behalf of the City of Chula Vista as herein above
stated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby
directed to transmit said map to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of San Diego.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that that certain Subdivision
Improvement Agreement dated the __ day of __, 2001, for the
completion of improvements in said subdivision, a copy of which is
on file in the office of the City Clerk, is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula Vista be and is hereby authorized to execute said agreements
for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
Presented by Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt Jc~M. Kaheny
Director of Public Works City Attorney
H: \Home~Attorney~RESO\OtayRanchVlg5 .R 29
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUPPLEMENTAL
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR VILLAGE
5, NEIGHBORHOOD R-29 OF THE OTAY R3kNCH
PROJECT, REQUIRING DEVELOPER TO COMPLY WITH
CERTAIN UNFULFILLED CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION
NO. 18398 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE
SAID AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the developer has executed a Supplemental
Subdivision Improvement Agreement to satisfy remaining conditions
of City Council Resolution No. 18398.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Supplemental
Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Village 5, Neighborhood R-29
of the Otay Ranch Project, a copy of which shall be kept on file in
the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula Vista is hereby authorized to execute said Agreement on
behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Director of Public Works City Attorney
[H:/HOME~ATTORNEY/RESO\ssia OR R-29 (Ma¢ch 30, 2001 (3:19PM)]
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date: 4/10/01
· ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving the form of a two party agreement between
the City of Chula Vista and various consultants for engineering and
landscape plan check services, amending the Department of Public Works
and Department of Parks and Recreation budgets by appropriating $75,000
and $25,000 respectively based on unanticipated revenues from developer
reimbursements, and authorizing the City Manager to execute said
agreement(s)
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Worksff/J
Director of Parks and ReEreation
REVIEWED BY: City Managert~' ryq,/~ (4/5 Vote: Yes X No )
The subject agreement will provide the City with the ability to respond to the ongoing plan check
work while maintaining a delicate balance between the quality of review, overall project
processing time and permanent staffing level.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving the form of a two party
agreement between the City of Chula Vista and various consultants for engineering and
landscape plan check services, amending the Department of Public Works (Engineering
Division) and Department of Parks and Recreation (Landscape-Architecture Division) budgets
by appropriating $75,000 and $25,000 respectively based on unanticipated revenues from
developer reimbursements, and authorizing the City Manager to execute said agreement(s).
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION:
Background
Staff is recommending the approval of agreements with consultants for plan check services
related to land development work to assist staff should construction activities remain strong in
the near future. Staff advertised for proposals in January and received proposals in February
from seven firms.
Contract Goals
Staff recommends approval of a consultant contract to provide engineering and landscape
architecture services to assist staff in responding to peak work load levels in plan checking. As
you are aware, the on-going growth in the planned communities in eastern Chula Vista and infill
development in the western part of the City is significant. Staff's recommendation to seek
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
consultant assistance during peak workload periods is based on the following principles and
goals:
1. Maintain "reasonable" review and processing times for development plans. Based on
workload projections, staff recommends using consultant services to assist staff in
complying with reasonable processing times. In balancing speed with quality, staff does
not recommend speeding up the process. To the contrary, the goal of the contract(s) is to
assign specific and limited tectmical tasks to private professionals to allow staff to focus
on entitlement, processing and policy issues.
2. Avoid permanent overstaffing in response to current peak workload levels. With
overstaffing, layoffs would be likely should construction activities slow at some point in
the future. Staff recommends that a consultant, providing a team of engineers and
landscape architects, be retained to address the peak workload, eliminating the need for
overstaffing and still meet reasonable plan check review time frames.
3. Reduce staff dependence on overtime to complete their projects and reduce overtime
expenditures to a manageable level. Present staff is working extensive overtime in an
attempt to accommodate the peak workload and meet the "standard" turnaround times.
4. Improve overall work efficiency during the entitlement process by focusing stafl?s time
on "big picture" items, processing, coordinating between departments and addressing
management and policy issues. The more routine plan check items can be successfully
delegated to a consultant with oversight by City staff. In most cases it is not practical for
engineering or landscape architect consultants to provide assistance at the "front end" of
projects (i.e. the review of SPA Plans, Tentative Maps, etc.) due to the major policy level
decisions that need to be made. There is, however, benefit to having consultants provide
services on the technical oriented "back end" of projects (i.e. review of grading plans,
improvement plans, landscape improvement plans, and final maps). However, project
management will remain the responsibility of the City.
5. Provide assurance that the City can respond should the construction market continue to
grow. The contract provides the City with the option, but not the obligation, to delegate
some of the technical review to a consultant. No revie~v work will be allocated to these
consultants should development activities decline due to economic forces or other issues.
Staff anticipates that the workload will continue to increase based on the development
community's approved projects.
6. Provide an additional resource to comply with the Subdivision Map Act requirement of
acting on Improvement plans within certain time limits.
Additionally, the tight job market has compounded the workload as not all budgeted positions
have been filled. There are five engineering positions and one landscape architecture position
currently open. (Human Resource staff is diligently pursuing the filling of the vacant positions.)
Staff recommends that the consultant(s) be brought under contract and then used if the need
arises to relieve staff of overtime and to meet "standard" work deadlines. Use of the consultant
would be determined on a case by case basis by management of the two departments. The
Page 3, Item__
Meeting Date 4/10/01
consultant services would not be utilized to expedite plan reviews nor be used as a substitute for
staff, unless so directed by Council.
Request for Proposal for Consultant Services
Staff advertised for Request for Proposals for Engineering and Landscape Architecture Plan
Check Services. Seven firms submitted proposals and a staff selection committee interviewed
the four most qualified firms. Based on the submittal materials and interviews a contract is being
negotiated with the highest ranked firm of Powell/PBS&J, the form of which is attached to this
report.
The selection committee ranked the top four firms as follows:
1. PoweWPBS&J (with Environs for landscape architect services)
2. Berryman & Henigar (with Nowell and Associates for landscape architect services)
3. P&D Consultants (P&D has in-house staff for landscape architect services)
4. Dudek & Associates, Inc. (with Environs for landscape architect services)
Staff recommends that the City Manager be authorized to enter into contracts with any one of
these four qualified firms on an as-needed basis. Doing so will enable the City Manager to enter
into a contract with next best-ranked firms providing a seamless transition from one consultant to
the next should there be staffing or performance issues with the first-ranked firm. It would also
allow the City Manager to utilize more than one firm if peak workloads warrant it. The contract
term is for one year subject to renewal at the City Manager's discretion, upon written request by
the City Engineer for two (2) one-year extensions (3 years total).
Action
The resolution approves the contract in substantially the form attached with Powell/PBS&J and
authorizes the City Manager to execute the agreement and extensions in a final form as approved
by the City Attorney. It also authorizes the City Manager to execute agreements with any one of
the other three firms in a form as approved by the City Attorney and substantially the same as the
PoweI1/PBS&J agreement. The total compensation shall not exceed $500,000 in any one year
for all firms combined (a maximum of $1,500,000 for 3 years combined). The contract is based
on an hourly rate. The development community supports staff's recommendation.
The resolution further approves mid-year appropriations totalling $100,000 to the Department of
Public Works and the Department of Parks and Recreation current year's operating budgets.
FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of the contract will ultimately be borne by the development
community via developer deposits and development staffing agreements. These accounts will
reimburse the General Fund for all expenses incurred.
Attachment: Two party agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Powell/PBSJ for Engineering and Landscape
Architect Plan Check Services
DDS-4/5/01 2:14:41 PM
lt:\l IOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA\RFPpowclIr doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FORM OF A TWO PARTY
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND
VARIOUS CONSULTANTS FOR ENGINEERING AND
LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK SERVICES, AMENDING THE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND DEPARTMENT OF
PARKS AND RECREATION BUDGETS BY APPROPRIATING
$75,000 AND $25,000 RESPECTIVELY BASED ON
UNANTICIPATED REVENUES FROM DEVELOPER
REIMBURSEMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT(S)
WHEREAS, the subject agreement will provide the City with the ability to respond to the
on-going plan check work while maintaining a delicate balance between the quality of review,
overall project processing time and permanent staffing level; and
WHEREAS, no agreement with any of the four firms listed below shall extend beyond
April 30, 2004; and
WHEREAS, staff advertised for Request for Proposals for Engineering and Landscape
Architecture Plan Check Services with seven firms submitting proposals; and
WHEREAS, the selection committee ranked the top four firms as follows:
1. PoweI1/PBS&J
2. Berryman & Henigar
3. P&D Consultants
4. Dudek & Associates, Inc.
WHEREAS, based on the submitted materials and interviews, a contract is being
negotiated with the highest ranked firm of Powell/PBS&J.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Manager is authorized to: (1)
execute one-year agreements with any one of the firms in the form substantially the same as the
agreement being negotiated with PoweI1/PBS&J subject to approval by the City Attorney (2)
renew the agreements for two (2) one-year extensions, through April 30, 2004 and (3) negotiate
the agreements for a total compensation, from Developers' deposits and staffing agreements, not
to exceed $500,000 in any one year for all firms combined (a maximum of $1,500,000 for
services through April 30, 2004); and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does
hereby approve a two party agreement in substantially the form as attached between the City of
Chula Vista and various consultants for engineer/rig and landscape plan check services, and
authorize the City Manager to execute said agreements in a final form as approved by the City
Attorney.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Department of Public Works (Engineering
Division) and Department of Parks and Recreation (Landscape Architecture Division) budgets
are hereby amended by appropriating $75,000 and $25,000 respectively based on unanticipated
revenues from developer reimbursements.
Presented by Approved as to form by
z---"~// 2'/ 74' .//,r ~ ~_/,-~-
John P. Lippitt John M( ~'6~r~ - ~'
Director of Public Works City Attorney
H:\Home\Attomey\Rs\Powell Co~]sultant lbrm
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
ITEM TITLE: Resolntion Authorizing the EastLak¢ Company to construct and
receive Transportation Development Impact Fee credit or reimbursement for
Olympic Parkway improvements between Hunte Parkway and the Olympic
Training Center and Hunte Parkway between Olympic Parkway and South
Greensview Drive/Oak Springs Drive and authorizing the Public Works
Director to sign the agreement with the EastLake Company modifying the
requirement of the Municipal Code
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works ~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~{~ ¢' (4/Sths Vote: Yes No X )
The City Engineer received a letter dated November 16, 2000 requesting reimbursement for the
construction of a portion of Olympic Parkway and Hunte Parkway, which are included in the City's
Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) program. Council previously authorized grading
and construction of wet utilities for these roadway segments through Resolution 19292 adopted on
December 8, 1998.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the resolution authorizing the EastLake
Company's construction of Olympic Parkway and Hunte Parkway, initiating credit or reimbursement
proceedings in accordance with the TDIF ordinance and authorizing the Public Works Director to
sign the agreement modifying the requirement of the Municipal Code for three bids.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
On November 16, 2000, Bill McKibbin, Assistant Project Manager for the EastLake Company, sent
a letter (Attaclunent "A") requesting reimbursement for the construction of Olympic Parkway
(between Hunte Parkway and the Olympic Training Center) and for Hunte Parkway (between
Olympic Parkway and South Greensview Drive/ Oak Springs Drive). These street segments are
respectively identified as Project No. 29 and No. 2la on the City's Transportation Development
Impact Fee Capital Improvement Program (TD1F CIP) list included in the Eastem Area TDIF report
revision dated October 25, 1999 (Attachment "B").
The EastLake Company previously requested authorization for grading and construction of wet
utilities in April 1998. Based on the contracts entered into by EastLake, the TDIF reimbursable
amount was estimated to be $1,107,532.35 for this portion of the work. On December 8, 1998
Resolution 19292 was adopted, which authorized construction of these improvements and initiated
TDIF credit proceedings.
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
The EastLake Company acted as the General Contractor for this project and contracted out the
construction work to nine different firms. In order to simplify the approval process, City staff
suggested to EastLake that this project be authorized in two parts; the first part including grading and
wet utilities and the second part including all other construction contracts. Therefore, all contracts
needed to be awarded prior to the second submittal for authorization. Most of the landscaping
contracts were awarded after the completion of other construction work. Eastlake, therefore,
decided to submit a request for reimbursement, along with invoices and receipts, after the completion
of all work on Olympic Parkway and Hunte Parkway.
Under TDIF Ordinance #2802, a developer may request reimbursement or credit for the construction
of facilities identified in the TDIF project list. The total cost estimate for constructing Project No.
29, Olympic Parkway fi.om Hunte Parkway to the Olympic Training Center, is $3,514,400. The total
cost estimate for constructing Project No. 21 a, Hunte Parkway fi.om South Greensview Drive, is
$591,024. The combined total for both these projects is $4,105,424.
EastLake ~twarded contracts for Olympic Parkway and Hunte Parkway together. The contract
amounts for TDIF reimbursable categories are as follows:
CATEGORY CONTRACTOR TOTAL AMOUNT
Paving SRM Contracting $ 786,178.29
Dry Utilities Schilling Corporation 66,080.00
Landscaping: Medians and TruGreen Landcare 798,103.00
Parkways
Slope Landscaping TruGreen Landcare 43,215.00
Landscape Drainage Valley Crest 69,990.00
Landscape Fencing Golden State Fence Co. 30,875.00
Concrete H & D Construction 343,198.50
TOTAL $ 2,137,639.79
Combined with the previous estimated TDIF reimbursable amount of $1,107,532.35 for grading and
wet utilities, this totals $3,243,172.14. This amount is covered by the budget for Projects 2la and
29 in the TDIF program.
It is anticipated that most of thc major projects listed in the TDi~ ordinances and reports will be
constructed by developers and that developers will earn credits against future fees at the building
permit stage. Should the credits from future projects not be enough to offset the developers' fi.ont
end expense for a particular project, the City will reimburse additional monies to the developers at
the time that the City feels there are adequate funds to do so and if reimbursement will not delay
needed future projects.
The TDIF Ordinance provides a procedure for issuance of credits or tender of reimbursement to
developers. According to Section 3.54.040 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the developer, upon
approval of the estimated cost of a project by the Director.of Public Works and receipt of valid bids
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
which have been approved by the Director of Public Works, shall be entitled to credit for 75 percent
of construction attributable to the Transportation Facility Project. These credits will be applied to
the developer's obligation to pay fees for building permits issued. The EastLake Company has
complied with the procedural requirements of the TDIF ordinance for credit at the 75 percent level.
Per the ordinance a description and cost estimate of the improvements along with other information
and statements are required to be submitted to the City.
The following information is provided in accordance with the TDIF ordinances and Directives and
Procedures for TDIF Reimbursement/Credit Process:
1. The letter dated November 16, 2000 requesting reimbursement for construction of roadway
facilities identified in the City's TDIF CI]? list (included as Attachments "A" and "B").
2. The C1P project descriptions are included as Attachment "B". Construction bid summaries,
along with copies of the actual bid proposals, were provided for each category of work.
3. The EastLake Company has prepared and submitted grading and improvement plans to the
City for both Olympic Parkway and Hunte Parkway. Grading, improvement, and landscape/
irrigation plans have been approved by the City for both projects. Most of the construction
work has been completed.
4. Easements and rights-of way for the project have all been obtained as required by the
Director of Public Works. All necessary permits and environmental clearances necessary for
construction of the project have been obtained as required by the Director of Public Works.
All necessary permits and environmental clearances have been obtained by the EastLake
Company. The EastLake Company has also paid all required permit and plan check fees and
posted any security which is necessary for the project.
5. The TDIF Ordinances require a developer to secure at least three qualified bids for the work
to be done and to award the contract to the lowest bidder. EastLake has complied with this
requirement for the contracts for Paving, Landscaping, Landscape Drainage, Fencing and
Concrete. Copies of all bids and contracts have been submitted to the City. On the Concrete
contract, the actual contractual amount was higher than the bid due to an additional concrete
sidewalk that was included in the project after the bids were obtained. H & D Construction
would probably have been the lowest bidder with inclusion of the additional work.
For the Dry Utilities contract, EastLake solicited bids from the three firms recommended by
their utility design consultant. However, only one of these firms, Schilling Corporation,
submitted a bid (Attachment "C"). The TDIF reimbursable portion of the bid, which
included $66,080 for street lights and interconnect, is lower than the $85,400 estimated by
BUCG, EastLake's dry utility consultant (Attachment "D"). Section 3.54.040(D) of the
Municipal Code states that the requirements of Section 3.54.040(C) (which include the three
bid stipulation) can be modified through an agreement entered into with the developer. This
agreement is inchided as Attachment "E". City staff recommends that the Director of Public
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
Works be authorized to sign this agreement, which modifies the three bid requirement for
this project only, due to the relatively small amount of the contract. Additionally, this
contract was signed in April 1999, at which time EastLake felt that soliciting three bids
would satisfy the City's contracting requirements. EastLake has been advised that it is not
sufficient to merely solicit three bids to qualify for TDIF reimbursement, and that TDIF
reimbursement requests with fewer than three bids may not be accepted in the future.
When all work has been completed to the satisfaction of the City, the EastLake Company shall
submit verification of payments made for construction of the project to the City. Reimbursement
for design costs will also be considered at this time. The Director of Public Works will make the
final determination on expenditures which are eligible for credit or reimbursement. The EastLake
Company will receive credit against required Transportation Development Impact Fees at the time
of issuance of building permits.
FISCAL IMPACT: None to the City. The EastLake Company has advanced all necessary funds
to construct the project and will receive credit in accordance with Ordinance #2802. The EastLake
Company will be eligible to receive up to an additional $1,603,229.84 in credit at this time. The
actual amount of total credit will be determined by the Director of Public Works and be based on
actual final costs. Under the TDIF Ordinance, reimbursement will only be disbursed when the City
determines that sufficient funds are available. The developer will pay City staff costs for
administration of the TDIF program.
Attachments:
A. Letter dated November 16, 2000 from Bill McKibbin, Assistant Project Manager for the
EastLake Company
B. Diagram showing TDIIe Project Nos. 2la and 20
C. Responses from Schilling Corporation, Southern Contracting Co. and Pacifica Contracting
regarding Dry Utilities bid solicitation
D. Dry Utilities Cost estimate by BUCG
E. Agreement between the City and the EastLake Company
H:~HOMEXENGIN EERXAGENDA\OLYMPKWY DIF.EMC.DOC
File #0725-30-HX064
Now~*'~ 16, 2000
Mr. C~f Swanson/City
Subject: Oldie P~kway Rc~s~t
De~ C~,
Please ~ow flxis leper to se~e ~ o~ fom~ req~ for ~b~nt ~ ~ c~fion of Ot~ic
P~k~ay ~d ~e sou~ ~st po~on ofH~ P~y.
no~ complete&
It is my understanding ~at the po~on ofHunm P~y ~om station 73+60 to Ol~plc Par~ay is m be
iuctuded ~ ~e Oldie Par~ay D~ Fac~.
Enclosefl please ~d ~e foQo~g do~en~ far ~ ~c~cw ~ ~blis~g re~b~sement.
Book 1:
Cost
~g
Landscape: P~kways
Book 2:
· Lan~cap~g: SI~e L~g
Lan~eap~g: D~gc
L~&~c~mg: Mifi~fion F~c~g
· S~cc~: Concrcle
Book 3:
- ~ O~des
Book 4:
We~ U~i~es: S~orm Dta~
~e ~s ~ ad~ ~o~o~ ~ ~ nee~e~ for Te~u~se~I please eo~et ~e at (~19) 42~ 127.
~iB M~bb~
CHULA VISTA D.I.F. EXHIBIT
FACILITY NO. 2la
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
,HUNTS PAP, KWA Y FRO~ SOUR" SREENSVIEW DP`WE TO OL ~PIC PARKWA
SB'j I
.
TYPE "G' CURB · GUTTER / p~ ~j ~ 6' ~E "G" CURB
4- LANE MAJOR
NO SCALE
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST:
SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $591,024
CONTINGENCY (15%) $88,654
DESIGN (6%) $35,461
INSPECTION / ADMIN (6%) $35,461
D,t F. ADMINISTRATION (2%) $11,820
TOTAL $762,421
I437x~lA,d~9 31799 115608
CHULA VISTA D.I.F. EXHIBIT
FACILITY NO. 29
P~R0 JECT DESCRIPTION:
OLYMPIC PARKWAY FROM HUNTE PARKWAY TO OLYMPIC TR.AININ~ CENTER.
CONSTRUCT 4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL ROAD
OLY~~
100'
50' ~.~ 50' ~
32' 8' i 8' 32'
4' P. C C S/D£YIALK 12 12 4' P.C.C~ SIDEWALK
$' T~PE "G' CURB ~ ~R / LP~KINo ~ PARKING ~ ~ ~ ~E "g' ~RB ~_~
BIKE LANE BIKE
4- LANE MAJOR
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST:
SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $3,514,400
CONTINGENCY (15%) $527,160
DESIGN (6%) $210,864
INSPECTION / ADMIN. (6%) $210,864
PROJECT MANAGEMENT (2%) $70,288
TOTAL $4,533,576
BIDDER INFORMATION
The bidder shall furnish the following information. Failure to comply with this requirement will render
the proposal informal mad may cause its rejection. Additional sheets may be attached if necessary.
(1) SCHILLING CORPORATION
Bidders Full Name
(2) P.O. BOX 719002, SUITE 518, SANTEE, CA 92072-9002
Address
(619) 448-5392
Telephone Number
(3) Type of Firm: Individual Parmership__ Corporation x
(4) Contractors License: Primary Class A License No. 4 s s 1 5 3
Supplemental Classifications Held if may:
(5) Names and Title of All Signatory Members of the Firm:
TOM SCHILLING PRESIDENT
WILMA SCHILLING SECRETARY/TREASURER
(6) Number of Years as a Contractor in this type of Construction: 15
(7) List Three (3) Projects of This Type mad Complexity Recently Constructed by Bidder:
Contract Amount: 164,939.00 Date Completed: March 1999
TypeofProject: UnderGround Utility Insta]~t~ - Dry
OwnersNgJne~ OTAY PROJECTi LLC
Address: 350 w. Ash Street, Ste 730, 'San Diego CA 92101
ContractAmourlt~ 143,724.00 Date Completed: Still in progress
TypeofProject: Underground Utility Installation - Dry
OwnersName: MIRAMAR RANCH NORTH
Address: 2727 Hoover Avenue, National city, CA 91950
Contlzot~IBount: 418,020.00 DateCompl~ed: February 1999
TypeofProject: Underqround Utility Installation - Dry
Owners Name: FIELDSTONE COMMUNI TI ESr INC:
Address: 5465 Morehouse Dr., Ste 250, San Diego, CA 92121
(8) Person who Inspected Site of the Proposed Work for Your Firm:
Name: TOM SCHILLING
Date of ~qsp~on[ April 08, 1999
(9) Person Who W'dl be h~ Charge of the Proposed Work for Your Fkm:
Name: TOM SCHILLING
Title: PRESIDENT
(10) Person(s) Who W'fll be Authorized to Sign Change Orders for Your Fh-m:
TOM SCHILLING
WILMA SCHILLING
Signature S~gnamre
TOM SCHILLING WILMA SCHILLING
Print or Type Name Print or Type Name
PRESIDENT SECRETARY/TREASURER
Title Title
Dated: April 14, 1999 Dated: April 14, 1999 -
SCItEDULE OF PRICES
1 JointTrench:,Gas, Electric, 1 L.S.
Telco, and Cox Cable 163,433.00
2 Street Light Interconnect I L.S.
2" conduit with 3" at
crossin[I 12,500.00
3 Street Light Installation 1 L.S.
53 , 580. 00
4 Concrete Products 1 L.S.
27,737.00
5 Import Fill Sand 1 L.S.
12,750.00
GRAND TOTAL
270,000.00
NOTE: Light Breakdwon for Item 93 is as follows:
1) Hunte Parkway (1) Single 250 Watt HPS Street Light
(t) Double 250 Watt HPS Street Light $47,465.
2) Olympic Parkway - (3) Single 250 Watt HPS Street Lights
~ (12) Double 250 Watt HPS Street Lights $ 6, 1t5.
Excludes all Traffic Signal Poles - TOTAL $53,580.
5
~ P.O. Box 445 · S~n Marc~CA92079-0~5 · Tet. 760-744-0760 · FAX 7S0-7~4-6475
WEB SITE: ~w. SouthernconLr~c[ing.cc~
MAY ~0, 19~9 Email:SccS~aol.cc~rn
MS. SHELLY DIXON
THE EASTLAKE COMPANY, LLC
900 LANE AVENT/E, SUITE 100
CHULA VISTA CA 91914
REFERENCE: OLYMPIC PARKWAY, DRY UTILITIES, STREET LIGHTS.
DUE TO THE CURRENT NON-AVAILABILITY OF THE PROPER PERSOI~NEL
~ EQUIPMENT FOR WORK OF THIS SPECIFIC NATURE DURING T~.IS
TIME SPAN SOUTHERN CONTRACTING COMPANY WILL NOT BE SI~MIT-
TiNG A BID FOR TEE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT.
WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BiD THIS WORK AND LOOK FOR-
WARD TO SUBMITTING PROPOSALS ON FUTI/R_E PROJECTS.
SKOULD YOU I~iAVE AI~ QUESTIONS OR DESIRE FURTHER INFORMATION,
PLEASE CONTACT THE UlX~DERSIGNED.
I~ERE~Y,
%NTRACTING COMPANY.
STEVE FISHER, PROJECT MANAGER
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
EAST ORANGE AVENUE ; ........
SEPTEMBER 23, 1998
POTENTIAL
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST REFUND
I- UTILITY ADVANCES*
I. SDG&E Electric 4740 LF 65.00 $308,100 $
2. Less 50% Discount Option <154,050>
3. SDG&E Gas 5100 LF 15.00 76,500 70,500
4. SDG&E ITCC 5100 LF 5.00 25,500
5. SDG&E Pole Relocation 2 EA 5500 11,000
SUBTOTAL UTILITY ADVANCES $267,050 $ 70,500
Il. CONTRACTOR COSTS
1. Trench 5100 LF 5.50 $ 28,050 $
2. Encasement 4740 LF 5.50 26,070
3. Conduit
a. 4-5" E 4740 LF 9.20 43,608
b. 2-5" E 1740 LF 4.60 8,004
c. 1-4" E 2550 LF 2.20 5,610
d. 4-4" T 4740 LF 8.00 41,712 15,200
e. 2-4" T 1740 LF 4.40 7,656 2,800
4. Substructures
a. 3316 E 4 EA 6,500 26,000
b. 342l E 3 EA 500 1,500
c. 3312 E 4 EA 600 2,400
d. 5' x 10'6" T 4 EA 5,500 22,000 2,000
SUBTOTAL CONI'RACTOR COSTS $ 212,610 $ 20,000
III. STREET LIGHTS
t. Single Ann 13 EA 2,800 $ 36,400
2. Double Arm 14 EA 3,500 49,000
SUBTOTAL STREET LIGHTS $ 85,400 $ -
TOTAL $ 565,060 $ 90,500
NET TOTAL $ 474,560
Cost includes 37% Income Tax Component Charges
"
AGREEMENT
Between
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE EASTLAKE COMPANY, LLC
For
OLYMP1C PARKWAY REEMBURSEMENT
For
MODIFICATION TO TDIF ORDiNANCE THREE BD REQUIREMENT
This agreement is entered into as of this day of ,2001, by and between the City
of Chula Vista (hereinafter referred to as "the City"), and The EastLake Company, LLC (hereinafter
referred to as "the Developer"), in view of the following facts and for the following purposes:
Whereas. the Developer was unable to receive the required three bids for the Dry Utilities
installation in Olympic Parkway ("Project") per the City's Transportation Development Impact Fee
Ordinance ("TDIF"), due to an unprecedented number of development projects under construction at that
time. Dry Utility Bid Packages were sent out to Schilling Corporation, Pacifica Contracting, and Southern
Contracting. Where as the Developer received a bid back from the Schilling Corporation both Pacifica and
Southern Contracting sent back letters of decline. Where as the Developer was informed by Devenco
Incorporated. their utility consultant, that Schilling Corporation, Pacifica Contracting, and Southern
Contracting would be the only three contractors available to perform this size and type of work; and
Whereas. the Developer is well aware that this was a unique situation and would appreciate it if
the City allow an exception to the Transportation Development Impact Fee Ordinance under these
circumstances. In addition, the bid received was in substantial conformance with other bids received for
similar work on other projects contracted at the same time;
Therefore. the parties a~ee as follows:
1. As to the project and for no other purposes, for the reasons set forth above, the City's
Mumcipal Code Section 3.54.040 requirement for three bids is hereby modified and Schilling
Corporation's estimate plus Devenco's Engineering cost estimate, are deemed sufficient for
TDIF credit.
2. The Developer ac ~knowledges and agrees that it is not entitled to submit only one bid on future
TDIF projects on the basis of this agreement.
In Witness thereof, this Agreement is executed by the City and by the Developer as of the date
frrst above written.
By
John Lippitt, Director of Public Works
City of Chula Vista
By Guy Asaro, Vice President
The EastLake Company, LLC
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE EASTLAKE COMPANY
TO CONSTRUCT AND RECEIVE TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CREDIT OR
REIMBURSEMENT FOR OLYMPIC PARKWAY
IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN HUNTE PARKWAY AIqD THE
OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER AND HUNTE PARKWAY
BETWEEN OLYMPIC PARKWAY AND SOUTH GREENSVIEW
DRIVE/OAK SPRINGS DRIVE AND AUTHORIZING THE
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT
WITH THE EASTLAKE COMPANY MODIFYING THE
REQUIREMENT OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, the City Engineer received a letter dated
November 16, 2000 from the Eastlake Company requesting
reimbursement for the construction of a portion of Olympic Parkway
and Hunte Parkway, which are included in the City's Transportation
Development Impact Fee (TDIF) program and
WHEREAS, Council previously authorized grading and
construction of wet utilities for these roadway segments through
Resolution 19292 adopted on December 8, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the TDIF Ordinance provides a procedure for
issuance of credits or tender of reimbursement to developers; and
WHEREAS, according to Section 3.54.040 of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code, the developer, upon approval of the
estimated cost of a project by the Director of Public Works and
receipt of valid bids, shall be entitled to credit for 75 percent
of construction attributable to the TDIF Project and these credits
will be applied to the developer's obligation to pay fees for
building permits issued
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista does hereby authorize the EastLake Company to
construct and receive Transportation Development Impact Fee
creditor reimbursement for Olympic Parkway improvements between
Hunte Parkway and the Olympic Training Center and Hunte Parkway
between Olympic Parkway and South Greensview Drive/Oak Springs
Drive.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works Director
is hereby authorized to sign the agreement with the EastLake
Company modifying the requirement of the Municipal Code.
Presented by Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of John-~. K~i~eny, ney
Public Works
H:\home\attorney\reso~EL TDIF Credit
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 04/10/01
ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving a new CIP project, Traffic Signal
Installation at Main Street and Maxwell Road (TF-292), and Transferring
existing appropriations in the amount of $125,000 fi:om the Chula Vista
Corporation yard Project (G_G:i 7 to the new project therefore.
SUBMITTED BY: DirectorofPublic Works~q~
REVIEW BY: City Manager 6~9~/ (4/Sths Vote: Yes X No )
On September 15, 1998, the City Council, By Resolution 19169, approved an agreement with
SDG&E to purchase their property located at 1800 Maxwell Road for the purpose of constructing
the City's new corporation yard. City staff determined that it would be necessary to install a
traffic signal at the intersection of Main street and Maxwell Road in conjunction with the
corporation yard project in order to assign the proper right-of way and maintain safety. Approval
of this resolution will allow for the timely installation of the traffic signal.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council Approve a new CIP project, Traffic Signal Installation
at the Intersection of Main Street and Maxwell Road (TF-292), and Transferring existing
appropriations in the amount of $125,000 fi:om the Chula Vista Corporation Yard Project (GG-
131) to the new CIP project in order to install the traffic signal.
BOARDS/COMMISSION: Not Applicable
DISCUSSION:
The intersection of Main Street and Maxwell Road is a T-intersection. Maxwell Road, which
~unctions as an industrial roadway, has an existing average daily traffic (ADT) of 1677 (year
2000 counts) and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. It is the only access to both the Otay Land Fill,
which is located within the most northerly parcel offof Maxwell Road, and the new corporation
yard, which will generate additional 1176 daily trips. Main Street, the major roadway, is
classified as a six-lane major street. It has approximately 16,000 ADT, an 85%tile speed of 53
mph and a posted speed of 45 mph. It serves as the main access to several significant attractions
including the Coors Amphitheater, the water park, the Otay land fill, several auto recycling
businesses and the new corporation yard. The latest SANDAG transportation forecast modeling
shows that Main Street will accommodate 59,000 ADT at build-out conditions.
Page 2, Item __
Meeting Date 04/10/01
The new corporation yard will increase the existing traffic volume of 1677 vehicle trips per day
to 2853 trips per day, a 70% total increase. The Caltrans-based warrant study, which was
performed on November 22, 2000, revealed that the intersection met six (6) of eleven (11)
warrants, where a minimum of three (3) warrants are needed to justify a traffic signal installation.
As a result, the intersection collected a total of 50 points, and ranked number three (3) on the
2001 Traffic Signal Evaluation List, which consisted of fifteen (15) studied intersections.
As mentioned above, the new corporation yard will cause the subject intersection to experience
an increase in the percentages of heavy, slow moving vehicles. Those vehicles are less
maneuverable and provide for less acceleration and deceleration responses than the typical
passenger vehicles. This, coupled with the fact that the 85% tile speed on Main Street is 53 mph,
makes it evident that a traffic signal is needed to maintain traffic safety and to assign right-of-
way for approaching vehicles and pedestrians.
Private developers proposing similar projects would have paid a significant amount of Traffic
Signal and DIF fees, or otherwise would be required to install a project-related traffic signal at
their own expense. The use of the Corporation Yard Project fund for the purpose of installing the
traffic signal is appropriate, since the City did not pay any Traffic Signal or D1F fees.
The new traffic signal will be equipped with L.E.D. traffic signal indications as well as L.E.D.
pedestrian module indications for lower power consumption. It will be interconnected and
coordinated with the traffic signal at the intersection of Main Street and Nirvana Avenue as well
as future traffic signals to the West. A back-up power supply will be included with this package
to keep the traffic signal in full operation during medium (6 hours or less) power outages. Video
detection will also be included in the design of the traffic signal to eliminate future loop
replacement as a result of pavement failure.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of the traffic signal is estimated at $125,000, taking into account that standards and
underground conduit are already in-place. There are enough fund appropriations to the
Corporation Yard Project contingency fund in order to cover related unanticipated items of work,
including the traffic signal installation. Operation and maintenance costs are estimated to be
$3,500 per year.
Attachments: Area plat for the intersection of Main Street and Maxwell Road
Cost estimate to install the traffic signal
Prepared By: Majed A1-Ghafry
H :\HOM E~ENGIN E ER~AG E N DAWiainMaxwelI.DOC
San Diego County Land Fill
New Corporarte Yard
Created By:
Dennis M, Wolfe
AREA PLAT
Date Created:
March 27, 2001
PROJECT: TIL&FFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT MAIN STREET
.&ND MAXWELL ROAD (TF NEV~:) FOR FY 01/02
Sheet of FIGURES CHECKED BY
Check that all signatures are affixed
__ Check D'pe and amount of bond
Addendams to be anknowleged
ENGINEER'S
ESTIMATE
NO. I ITEM QTY UNIT UNITCOST TOTAL
I Furnish and Install Traffic Signal 170E Controller
1 EA $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000,00
and 332 Cabinet. Install New Foundation, Pad, etc...
2 I Fumish and Install SDG&E Approved Meter Pedestal 1 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 2~500,00
3'lFumish and Install Type lA Traffic Signal Standard 1 EA $ 750.00 $ 750.00
Furnish & Install (50') Signal Mast Arm on * EA $ '1,200.00 $ 2,400.00
4 Ex sting 29-5-70 Traffic Signa Standard -
q Furnished & Install (35') Signal Mast Arm on
- [Existing 24-4-70 Traffic Signal Standard I EA $ '1,000.00 5; 1,000.00
6 I Farnish and Install Video Detection Cameras I 3 EA $ 6,000.00 $ 18,000.00
7 I Fumish and Install 3-Lens Vehicular Indication I 12 EA $ 600.00 $ 7,200.00
8 IFurnish and Install Pedestrian Indication i 4 EA S 450.00 $ 1,800.00
9 tFumish and Install ADA Pedestrian Pushbutton w/sign 4 EA $ 200.00 $ 800.00
t0 IWireintersection 1 LS $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00
11 Furnish and Install I.I.S.N,S. ! 3 EA ! $ 750.00 $ 2.250.00
12 Install City-Furnished E.V.P.E System I 1 LS $ 500.00 $ 500.00
Furnish and Install Signs (Per Plan)
13 and Pedestrian Barricades~ 1 LS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
14 [Traffic Control [ I LS $ 1.000.00 $ 1.000.00
15 Removal, Disposal. and Protection
of Exist ng Improvements 1 LS $1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
TOTAL [ $ 64.200.00
5% PPdCE DIFFERENTIAL $ 3.210.00
SUB-TOTAL [ $ 67,410.00
15% CONTINGENCY $ I0.114.50
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ! $ 77,500.00
CITY FURNISHED E.V.P.E. SYSTEM I $ 7,200.00
DESIGN $ 15,000.00
INSPECTION $ 1~,000.00
GENEIL~L ADMINISTRATION I $ 5,000.00
TOT.aL PROJECT COST
H:FFiOME/ENGINEER/TRA_FFIC/ENGINEERING COST ESTIMaTE/COST EST MAIN AND MAX'C, rELL.xls
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING A NEW CIP PROJECT,
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT MAIN STREET AND
MAXWELL ROAD (TF-292), AND TRANSFERRING
EXISTING APPROPRIATIONS OF $125,000 FROM THE
CHULA VISTA CORPORATION YARD (GG-131) TO THE
NEW PROJECT THEREFOR
WHEREAS, on September 15, 1998, the City Council, by Resolution 19169, approved an
agreement with SDG&E to purchase their property located at 1800 Maxwell Road for the
purpose of constructing the City's new corporation yard; and
WHEREAS, City staff determined that it would be necessary to install a traffic signal at
the intersection of Main street and Maxwell Road in conjunction with the corporation yard
project in order to assign the proper right-of way and maintain safety; and
WHEREAS, approval of this resolution will allow for the timely installation of the traffic
signal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby approve a new CIP Project, Traffic Signal Installation at Main Street m~d
Maxwell Road (TF-292), and transferring existing appropriations in the amount of $125,000
from the Chula Vista Corporation Yard (GG-13 I) to the new project therefore.
Presented by Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt ~At oKrnaeh;ny
Director of Public Works
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM NO.:
MEETING DATE: 04/10/01
ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "E"
STREET TO "G" STREET FOR THE CINCO DE MAYO CELEBRATION
ON MAY 6, 2001, WAIVING PROHIBITION ON SIDEWALK SALES,
AND WAIVING BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES FOR DOWNTOWN
BUSINESS ASSOCIATION AND VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN THE
EVENT
RESOLUTION APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "E"
STREET TO "G" STREET FOR THE CHULA VISTA THIRD AVENUE
LEMON FESTIVAL ON AUGUST 19, 2001, WAIVING PROHIBITION
ON SIDEWALK SALES, AND WAIVING BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES
FOR DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION AND VENDORS
PARTICIPATING IN THE EVENT
RESOLUTION APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "D"
STREET TO "1" STREET AND "H" STREET BETWEEN SECOND AND
FOURTH AVENUES, AND PORTIONS OF INTERSECTING STREETS
ON DECEMBER 1, 2001 FOR THE 39TM ANNUAL STARLIGHT YULE
PARADE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
RESOLUTION APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "E"
STREET TO "H" STREET AND PARK WAY FROM THIRD AVENUE TO
FOURTH AVENUE ON DECEMBER 8, 2001 FOR THE JINGLE BELL
RUN AND WALK EVENT, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
SUBMITTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGER
4/5THS VOTE: YES
BACKGROUND
The Chula Vista Downtown Business Association (DBA) is requesting the closure of Third Avenue and
portions of other streets for four 2001 promotional events. For administrative efficiency purposes, as
last year, all street closure events are presented for Council consideration at one time.
· Cinco De Mayo celebration on May 6
· Lemon Festival on August 19
· Starlight Yule Parade on December 1
· Jingle Bell Run and Walk on December 8
PAGE 2, ITEM NO.:
MEETING DATE: 04/10/01
The Cinco De Mayo and Lemon Festival are annual events. To operate them, the DBA requests that
Third Avenue be closed between 'E' and 'G" streets from 6 a.m. - 8 p.m. on the respective date of
each event. Adivities will include live entertainment along with approximately 200 arts, crafts and
food booths.
The Annual Starlight Yule Parade will be held for the 39rh year. For the parade, DBA requests
closing Third Avenue between "D" and '1" streets, "H' Street between Second and Fourth avenues
and portions of interseding streets from 3 p.m. - 9 p.m. on Saturday, December 1.
The Jingle Bell Run and Walk is a new promotional event that will benefit both the DBA and Chula
Vista Cares. The proposed route of the event will be from Fourth Avenue on Park Way to Third
Avenue, south on Third Avenue to "H' Street, returning northbound on Third Avenue to "E" Street,
and returning to a termination point in the "bowl" at Memorial Park. For this event, DBA requests
the above-mentioned streets be closed from 4:30 p.m. - 8 p.m. on Saturday, December 8.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt the resolutions:
a) Approving closure of Third Avenue from "E" to 'G" streets and adjacent side
streets to the alleyways on May 6, 2001 subject to conditions listed in Attachment
A of resolution, waiving prohibition on sidewalk sales, and waiving business
license tax for the DBA and vendors taking part in the event;
b) Approving the closure of Third Avenue from "E" to "G" streets and adjacent side
streets to the alleyway on August 19, 2001 subject to condition listed in
A~achment B of the resolution, waiving prohibition on sidewalk sales, and waiving
business license taxes for the DBA and vendors taking part in the event;
c} Approving the closure of Third Avenue between 'D" and '1" streets, "H" Street
between Second and Fourth avenues, and other east-west streets that intersect
Third Avenue between 'D' and '1" streets on Saturday, December 1, 2001 for the
39~h Annual Starlight Yule Parade subject to conditions listed in Attachment C;
d) Approving the closure of Park Way between Third and Fourth avenues and Third
Avenue between 'E" and 'H' streets on Saturday, December 8, 2001 for the
Jingle Bell Run and Walk subject to conditions in AHachment D.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION
The Town Centre I Project Area Committee unanimously endorsed the street closures at its
meeting of March 14, 2001.
PAGE 3, ITEM NO.:
MEETING DATE: 04/10/01
DISCUSSION
May 6, 2001 - Cinco de Mayo Celebration
August 19, 2001 -'Lemon Festival
The DBA is requesting the following for the 2001 Cinco De Mayo and 2001 Lemon Festival
1. The closure of Third Avenue behveen "E' and "G' streets on Sunday, May 6 and Sunday,
August 19, 2001 from 6 a.m.- 8 p.m.; and
2. Allowing sidewalk sales for each event; and
3. A waiver of business license taxes for the DBA and vendors taking part in each event.
The closure of Third Avenue will affect the flow of traffic in the downtown area. The DBA will be
required to coordinate with the City's Traffic Engineer and prepare a traffic control plan to the Traffic
Engineer's specifications. The City's transit system will also be affected. The Transit Coordinator's
staff has agreed to the closure as long as 'E" and "G" streets remain passable for traffic. The DBA
is aware of this stipulation and will abide by it.
The DBA has requested that the business license tax for promotional events be waived for festivals.
The taxes involved include a $5 assessment to the sponsoring organization (DBA) and a requirement
that each vendor have a Chula Vista business license (costing $12.50 to each business without a
current business license).
In the past, the City has waived the business license tax for the DBA and vendors taking part in the
one day event in order to encourage participation. The rationale for waiving the fee is that the
festivals a~tract thousands of visitors and residents to the Chula Vista downtown and promote the
downtown businesses. The resulting effect will be the generation of additional commercial adivity
and increased sales tax revenue to the City. Waiving the business license taxes will encourage
vendor participation. Since having a large number of vendors will help ensure the success of the
events, staff recommends the waiver.
Both events include food booths and an alcohol tent. These areas will be operated in accordance
with the regulations of the San Diego County Health Department, ABC and City Fire Department
and Police Department.
Additional conditions are listed in Attachment A and B of the resolution.
December 1, 2001 - Starlight Yule Parade
The DBA is requesting the closure of Third Avenue between "D" and '1' streets and 'H" Street
between Second and Fourth avenues. The parade route will be along Third Avenue between 'E"
and 'H' streets. Other areas of the closure will be used for pre-parade staging, bus parking and
parade debarkation. Second and Fourth avenues will remain open to traffic at all times during the
event. Chula Vista and San Diego Transit busses will continue to run during the street closure, but
they will run on advertised detour routes.
PAGE 4, ITEM NO.:
MEETING DATE: 04/10/01
The parade is scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m. and wil~ end no later than 9 p.m. S~reet closures will
be staggered and will begin around 3 p.m. when staging for the parade begins.
The DBA will be required to send notices to all businesses and residences located along the parade
route. Other conditions of approval include provisions for insurance, a Hold Harmless Agreement,
sanitary systems and posting of no parking signs.
December 8, 2001 -Jingle Bell Run and Walk
The DBA is requesting the closure of Park Way between Third and Fourth avenues and of Third
Avenue between "E" and "H" streets between 4:30 - 8 p.m. to conduct the Jingle Bell Run and Walk.
This event is designed to attract people to the downtown area to see the Holiday Lights and,
additionally, to serve as a fund-raising event for Chula Vista Cares. A portion of entry fees will be
donated to Chula Vista Cares, or entrants may receive a reduction in the entry fee for donating food
items or hard goods to the charity drive.
This event is in its first year and details are still being discussed. It is expected that the activities will
begin at approximately 5:30 p.m. and conclude at the Memorial Park Bowl at approximately 7:30
p.m. Included events are, tentatively, a 2-mile run, a 2-mile walk, and a holiday pet walk, as well as
prizes.
The DBA will be required to send notices to all businesses and residences located along the event
route. Other conditions of approval include provisions for insurance, a Hold Harmless Agreement,
sanitary systems, proper permission from the Parks and I~ecreation Department and posting of no
parking signs.
FISCAL IMPACT
The City will incur the administrative costs of processing this request. The DBA has requested that
the business license taxes be waived for the Cinco De Mayo Celebration and the Lemon festival.
The tax involved is a fee of $5 to the sponsoring organization (BDA) and a $12.50 tax for each
participating vendor not currently having a Chula Vista business license. By waiving this tax, the
City will forego approximately $900 in fee for each event. Costs for each event are paid by the
DBA or, in some instances, shared by City Departments. Costs incurred for individual
departments are itemized in their respective budgets.
ATTACHMENTS
Hold Harmless Agreement
a} Cinco De Mayo conditions of approval
b) Lemon Festival conditions of approval
c) Starlight Yule Parade conditions of approval
d) Jingle Bell Run and Walk conditions of approval
J:\COMMDEV~STAFF.REP\04-10-01 \dbastreet closures 01 .doc
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CI'FY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "E" ¥O
"G" STREETS FOR THE CINCO DE MAYO CELEBRATION ON
MAY 6, 2001, WAIVING PROHIBITION ON SIDEWALK SALES, AND
WAIVING BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES FOR DOWNTOWN
BUSINESS ASSOCIATION AND VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN
EVENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista established a Business Improvement
Area on November 16, 1971, which created the Chula Vista Downtown Business Association
("DBA"); and
WHEREAS, the DBA has requested to close Third Avenue from "E" to ~G" Streets including
adjacent side streets to bhe alleyway in order to conduct the Cinco De Mayo Celebration on May 6,
2001; and
WHEREAS, the DBA has requested a waiver,.of the City's prohibition on sidewalk sales so
that the DBA can conduct the 2001 Cinco De Mayo Celebration; and
WHEREAS, the DBA has also requested a waiver of the Business License Tax for
promotional events for the DBA and vendors participating in the 2001 Cinco De Mayo Celebration;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does
hereby approve the closure of Third Avenue from "E" to "G" Streets on May 6, 2001, for the purpose
of the DBA conducting ~e 2001 Cinco De Mayo Celebration subject to conditions listed in
Attachment A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approves the
requested waiver of the City's prohibition on sidewalk sales so that the DBA can conduct the 2001
Cinco De Mayo Celebration.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approves the
requested waiver of the City's Business License Tax for the DBA and all vendors participating in the
2001 Cinco De Mayo Celebration on May 6, 2001.
Presented by Approved es to form by
Chris Salomone J o..~. Kah'~enf~'~
Director of Community Development ~/Attomey
/0/4-/
ATTACHMENT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR
CHULA VISTA THIRD AVENUE ClNCO DE MAYO CELEBRATION
1. The DBA shall provide for adequate traffic and crowd control, as determined by the
City's Traffic Engineer and Police Department;
2. The DBA shall provide adequate litter control during and after the event, including
professional street sweeping;
3. The DBA shall notify all property owners and tenants (including businesses and
residents) that will be affected by the street closure. The notification must be sent by
first class mail at least seven days pdor to the event date;
4. The DBA will be responsible for measures to insure that the noise generated by the
event=s activities does not reach an excessive level; the DBA will undertake the
following measures in order to implement this condition:
1) DBA shall continually monitor noise levels of performing bands, stereos, and
other sound-emitting devices and will make adjustments as needed;
2) A plan showing the location of the performing stages will be submitted for
Community Development staff review and approval prior to the event;
3) All band performances shall be limited to the hours of 10 a.m. and 6 p.m.;
5. In order to meet the requirement of the Fire Marshall, the alleyways between "E" Street
and "G" Street, east and west of Third Avenue, shall remain open and unobstructed for
the purpose of fire apparatus access in the event of an emergency. The Fire Marshall
has required that all food-cooking vendors have a 2A10BC-type fire extinguisher readily
available in their booths;
6. In order to meet the requirements of the Fire MarShall and the Transit Division, "E" and
"G" Streets must remain open to traffic;
7. The Downtown Business Association must provide, 10 days prior to the Festival,
evidence of general liability insurance in the amount of $1 million, in the form of a
certificate of insurance and policy endorsement satisfactory to the City, naming the City
of Chula Vista and the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency as additional insured; and
8. The Downtown Business Association must execute an agreement to hold the City
harmless from any liability stemming from Festival activities in the street.
9. The Downtown Business Association shall obtain a temporary license from the ABC for
the sale of beer and shall comply with all requirements set forth in the license and by the
Chula Vista Police Department.
10. The location of the food and beverage tents shall be approved by the Police and Fire
Department at least 30 days prior to the event.
-2.
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "E" TO
"G" STREETS FOR THE CHULA VIST THIRD AVENUE LEMON
FESTIVAL ON AUGUST 19, 2001, WAIVING PROHIBITION ON
SIDEWALK SALES, AND WAIVING BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES
FOR DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION AND VENDORS
PARTICIPATING IN EVENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista established a Business Improvement
Area on November 16, 1971, which created the Chula Vista Downtown Business Association
("DBA"); and
WHEREAS, the DBA has requested to close Third Avenue from "E" to "G" Streets including
adjacent side streets to th.e alleyway in order to conduct the 2001 Chula Vista Third Avenue Lemon
Festival on August 19, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the DBA has requested a waiver.of the City's prohibition on sidewalk sales so
that the DBA can conduct the 2001 Chula Vista Third Avenue Lemon Festival; and
WHEREAS, the DBA has also requested a waiver of the Business License Tax for
promotional events for the DBA and vendors participating in the 2001 Chula Vista Third Avenue
Lemon Festival; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does
hereby approve the closure of Third Avenue from "E" to "G" Streets on August 19, 2001, for the
purpose of the DBA conducting the 2001 Chula Vista Third Avenue Lemon Festival subject to
conditions listed in Attachment B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approves the
requested waiver of the City's prohibition on sidewalk sales so that the DBA can conduct the 2001
Chula Vista Third Avenue Lemon Festival.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approves the
requested waiver of the City's Business License Tax for the DBA and all vendors participating in the
2001 Chula Vista Third Avenue Lemon Festival on August 19, 2001.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Chds Salomone Johfi M. Kahenv
Director of Community Development ~l;~A~orney ' C~
A]-FACHMENT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR
CHULA VISTA THIRD AVENUE LEMON FESTIVAL
1. The DBA shall provide for adequate traffic and crowd control, as determined by the City's Traffic
Engineer and Police Department;
2. The DBA shall provide adequate litter control during and after the event, including professional street
sweeping;
3. The DBA shall notify all property owners and tenants (including businesses and residents) that will be
affected by the street closure. The notification must be sent by first class mail at least seven days
prior to the event date;
4. The DBA will be responsible for measures to insure that the noise generated by the event's activities
does not reach an excessive level; the DBA will,.undertake the following measures in order to
implement this condition:
1) DBA shall continually monitor noise levels of performing bands, stereos, and other sound-
emitting devices and will make adjustments as needed;
2) A plan showing the location of the performing stages will be submitted for Community
Development staff review and approval prior to the event;
3) All band performances shall be limited to the hours of 10 a.m. and 6 p.m.;
5. In order to meet the requirement of the Fire Marshall, the alleyways between "E" Street and "G" Street,
east and west of Third Avenue, shall remain open and unobstructed for the purpose of fire apparatus
access in the event of an emergency. The Fire Marshall has required that all food-cooldng vendors
have a 2A10BC-type fire extinguisher readily available in their booths;
6. In order to meet the requirements of the Fire Marshall and the Transit Division, "E" and "G" Streets
must remain open to traffic;
7~ The Downtown Business Association must provide, 10 days pdor to the Festival, evidence of general
liability insurance in the amount of $1 million, in the form of a certificate of insurance and policy
endorsement satisfactory to the City, naming the City of Chula Vista and the Chula Vista
Redevelopment Agency as additional insured; and
8. The Downtown Business Association must execute an agreement to hold the City harmless from any
liability stemming from Festival activities in the street.
9. The Downtown Business Association must execute an agreement to hold the City harmless from
any liability stemming from Festival activities in the street.
10. The location of the food and beverage tent shall be approved by the Police and Fire Department at
least 30 days prior to the event.
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "D" TO
"1" STREETS, "H" STREET BETWEEN SECOND AND FOURTH
AVENUES AND PORTIONS OF INTERSECTING STREETS ON
DECEMBER '1, 200'1 FOR THE 39TM ANNUAL STARLIGHT YULE
PARADE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista established a Business Improvement
Area on November 16, '197'1, which created the Chula Vista Downtown Business Association
("DBA"); and
WHEREAS, the DBA has requested the temporary closure of Third Avenue from "D" to "1"
Streets, "H" Street from Second to Fourth Avenues, and all other east-west streets that intersect
Third Avenue between "D" and "~" Streets to the nearest point of detour to Third Avenue to conduct
the annual Starlight Yule Parade on December '1,200'1; and
WHEREAS, the Starlight Yule Parade has been a Downtown and City tradition for 38 years
and the City Council finds that the parade is a benefit to the Community; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does
hereby approve the temporary closure of Third Avenue from "D" to "1" Streets, "H" Street from
Second to Fourth Avenues, and all other east-west streets that intersect Third Avenue between "l"
and "D" Streets to the nearest point of detour to Third Avenue to conduct the Annual Starlight Yule
Parade on December '1, 200'1 subject to conditions listed in Attachment C, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Chds Salomone
~:::~h ~/M. Kaheny ~..
Director of Community Development /Cj,t:y'Attorney
ATTACHMENT C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR
STARLIGHT YULE PARADE STREET CLOSURE
1. At least 10 days before the street closure, the Downtown Business Association
(DBA) shall submit to the City evidence of general liability insurance in the
amount of $1 million, in the form of a certificate of insurance and policy
endorsement which names the City as additional insured.
2. At least 10 days before the street closure, the DBA shall submit to the City a hold
harmless agreement in a form acceptable to the City.
3. The DBA shall distribute written notification to all residences and businesses
along the parade route and along other streets that will be closed to traffic, of the
date(s) and duration of the event at least 10 days before street closure.
4. The DBA shall provide portable toilets along the parade route.
5. The DBA shall provide and post "No Parking" signs in a form acceptable to the
City Traffic Engineer, along the parade route. Posting must take place a
minimum of forty-eight (48) hours in advance of the effective time.
H:~-tOME~COMMDEV~Estes~DBA\YULEPAR conditions of approvaLdoc
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM 'E' TO
"H" STREETS, PARK WAY BETWEEN THIRD AND FOURTH
AVENUES ON DECEMBER 8, 2001 FOR THE JINGLE BELL RUN
AND WALK
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista established a Business Improvement
Area on November 16, 1971, which created the Chula Vista Downtown Business Association
("DBA"); and
WHEREAS, the DBA has requested the temporary closure of Third Avenue from "E" to "H"
Streets and Park Way from Third to conduct the Jingle Bell Run and Walk on December 8, 2001;
and
WHEREAS, the The Jingle Bell Run and Walk will benefit the Community by providing a
social and recreational event and by benefiting Chula Vista Cares; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the'~ity Council of the City of Chula Vista does
hereby approve the temporary closure of Third Avenue from "E" to "H" Streets and Park Way from
Third to Fourth Avenues to conduct the Jingle Bell Run and Walk on December 8, 2001 subject to
conditions listed in Attachment D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Chris Salomone Jo--h~ IV~'. Kaheny ~
Director of Community Development Ci~ttorney
ATTACHMENT D
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR JINGLE BELL RUN AND WALK
1. At least 10 days before the street closure, the Chula Vista Downtown Business
Association (DBA) shall submit to the City evidence of general liability insurance
in the mount of $1 million, in the form ora certificate of insurance and policy
endorsement which names the City as an additional insured.
2. At least 10 days before the street closure, the DBA shall submit to the City a Hold
Harmelss Agreement in a form acceptable to the City:
3. The DBA shall distribute written notification to all residences and businesses
along the event route of the closure of the street, hours and date of the event at
least 10 days prior to the event.
4..The DBA shall provide portable toilets at the starting and finishing point of the
event.
5. The DBA shall provide and post "No Parking" signs in a form acceptable to the
City Traffic Engineer along the event route. Posting must take place a minimum
of 48-hours in advance of the effective date.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No
Meeting Date 4/10/01
ITEM TITLE: Resolution Waiving the consultant selection process
as impractical, appointing the firm of Best, Best, & Krieger,
LLP as bond counsel, the firm of Stone & Youngberg, LLC
as underwriter, and the firm of Fieldman, Rolapp &
Associates as financial advisor for all land-secured
infrastructure financing transactions by amending their
respective agreements and authorizing the Mayor to execute
amendments to existing agreements with these firms.
SUBMITTED
BY:
Deputy City Manager Powell ~(~
REVIEWED BY: City Managed~.~o~, ( 4/5ths Vote: Yes __ No X )
SUMMARY;
The City currently has nine assessment districts and three community facility
districts, all formed for the purpose of financing infrastructure improvements.
Stone & Youngberg, Best, Best, & Krieger, and Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates
are under contract with the City to serve as underwriter, bond counsel, and
financial advisor respectively on all land-secured infrastructure financing
transactions in the Otay Ranch territory and Sunbow I1. It is recommended that
the existing agreements be amended to include all future CFD transactions.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council approve the Resolution waiving the consultant selection process as
impractical, appointing the firm of Best, Best, & Krieger, LLP as bond counsel,
the firm of Stone & Youngberg, LLC as underwriter, and the firm of Fieldman,
Rolapp & Associates as financial advisor for all land-secured infrastructure
financing transactions, and authorizing the Mayor to execute amendments to
existing agreements with these firms.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: None
DISCUSSION:
The City began utilizing infrastructure assessment districts in 1985 in order to
provide long-term financing for necessary infrastructure in newly developing
areas of the City. There are currently nine assessment districts and three
community facility districts with outstanding debt. Trimark Pacific Homes, L.P.,
the developer of the San Miguel Ranch project, recently submitted a request for
//- /
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
the City to consider forming a community facilities district for the purpose of
financing certain infrastructure in that project.
Due to the inherent complexities in this type of financing, the City has historically
utilized the same or primarily the same team of consultants. In fact, in March
1999, the Council approved contracts with these firms to participate in all future
transactions of this type within the Otay Ranch territory. Had staff anticipated the
need for infrastructure financing in areas outside of the Otay Ranch territory, they
would have not have recommended restricting the existing contract to only that
area. All three contracts are subject to termination upon thirty-day notice. Over
the previous twelve month period, the following amounts have been paid to these
three firms for similar work in the City: Best, Best & Krieger (previously Brown,
Diven,& Hessell), $70,963, Stone & Youngberg, $437,138, Fieldman, Rolapp &
Associates, $59,284.
Mr. Warren Diven, with the law firm of Best, Best, & Krieger, has served as bond
counsel on virtually every assessment district, including maintenance districts,
and community facilities district in the City. He has unparalleled knowledge in
the field of land-secured financing and obviously has extensive experience and
knowledge of the City of Chula Vista.
The municipal banking firm of Stone & Youngberg served as the underwriter on
the 1995 assessment district refinancing. They are also under contract with the
City to serve as the underwriter on all land-secured financings undertaken in the
Otay Ranch territory. Their knowledge and experience in California in this arena
are unsurpassed, and due to their involvement not only in the 1995 refinancing,
but also on four City infrastructure borrowings since then, they have an in-depth
understanding of the nuances of development in eastern Chula Vista. In
addition, both of these firms were recently appointed to execute a refunding of
the outstanding debt for seven existing financing districts.
Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates has served commendably as the City's financial
advisor on the three most recent land-secured infrastructure financings, thereby
gaining valuable knowledge of the City and its development culture. They are
one of the top financial advisory firms in the Western United States.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All costs for these contracts are either contingent upon actually selling bonds and
are payable solely from the bond proceeds, or are payable from developer
deposits. On an average borrowing of $10 million, the following fees would be
expected under the amended contracts:
Underwriting ................... $175,000
Bond Counsel ................. $ 37,500
Financial Advisor .............. $ 38,000
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
Staff has verified that these fees are in line with levels that the City has
previously paid and also with what other jurisdictions are currently paying.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, WAIVING THE
CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS AS IMPRACTICAL,
APPOINTING THE FIRM OF BEST, BEST, & KRIEGER,
LLP AS BOND COUNSEL, THE FIRM OF STONE &
YOUNGBERG, LLC AS UNDERWRITER, AND THE FIRM
OF FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES AS FINANCIAL
ADVISOR FOR ALL LAND-SECURED INFRASTRUCTURE
FINANCING TRANSACTIONS BY AMENDING THEIR
RESPECTIVE AGREEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING
AGREEMENTS WITH THESE FIRMS
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista (the "City") has previously formed nine assessment
districts and three cormnunity facilities districts for the purpose of providing long term financing
of infrastructure improvements to serve the properties within such districts; and
WHEREAS, due to the inherent complexity of such land secured financings, the City has
historically utilized the same team of consultants to assist the City in structuring such financings
and undertaking the due diligence required for such financings; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously entered into contracts with these consultants, Stone &
Youngberg as underwriter, Best Best & Krieger LLP as bond counsel, Fieldman Rolapp &
Associates as financial advisor, for all land secured infrastructure financing transactions for the
Otay Ranch territory and Sunbow II; and
WHEREAS, Trimark Pacific Homes, L.P., has requested that the City consider the formation
of a community facilities district to finance infrastructure in the San Miquel Ranch which is located
outside of the Otay Ranch territory and Sunbow II; and
WHEREAS, again due to the complexity of such land secured financings, staff now
recommends that the City contract with such firms to provide necessary consultant services for all
future land secured financing transactions including the San Miquel Ranch project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. This City Council hereby finds that the appointment of an underwriter, bond
counsel, financial advisor, market absorptiOn consultant, appraiser and special tax consultant for
future proceedings for land secured financings pursuant to the consultant selection process would be
impractical for the reasons set forth above and in the accompanying staff report. Therefore, Stone &
Youngberg LLC is hereby appointed as underwriter, Best Best & Krieger LLC is hereby appointed
as bond counsel and Fieldman Rolapp & Associates is hereby appointed as financial advisor for all
future land secured, financing transactions within the City and the Mayor is hereby authorized to
execute an amendments to the existing agreements with such firms to reflect such appointments.
SECTION 3. This resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.
PREPARED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Robert Powell John ~,,~aheny
Deputy City Manager City/u34~orney
/1-.5
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No.: ] c~
Meeting Date: 04/10/01
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: PCM 01-19: Consideration o£amendments to the
Salt Creek Ranch General Development Plan, Sectional Planning Area (SPA)
Plan and Planned Community District Regulations to change the land use
designation of a 7-acre parcel, located on the south side of Proctor Valley
Road, between Hunte Parkway and Duncan Ranch Road from Low Density
Residential to Community Purpose Facility and Park; and the land use
designation o£a 3-acre parcel adjacent to the north from Community Purpose
Facility to Park.
RESOLUTION: Approving amendments to the Salt Creek
Ranch General Development Plan and Sectional PIauning Area (SPA) plan to
change the land use designation ora 7-acre parcel, located on the south side
of Proctor Valley Road, between Hnnte Parkway and Duncan Ranch Road,
from Low Density Residential to Community Purpose Facility; and the land
use designation of a 3-acre parcel adjacent to the north from Community
Purpose Facility to Park.
ORDINANCE: Approving amendments to the Salt Creek
Ranch Planned Community District Regulations to change the land use
designation of a 7-acre parcel, located on the south side of Proctor Valley
Road, between Hunte Parkway and Duncan Ranch Road from Low Density
Residential to Community Purpose Facility and Park; and the land use
designation of a 3-acre parcel adjacent to the north from Community Purpose
Facility to Park.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning and Building~./~//.
REVIEWED BY: City Manager&t¢".o../ (4/5ths Vote: Yes__ No X )
The applicant, Pacific Bay Homes, has submitted an application to amend the Salt Creek Ranch
(referred to hereafter as "Rolling Hills Ranch") General Development Plan (GDP), Sectional
Planning Area (SPA) plan and Planned Community District Regulations in order to change the land
use designation of a 7-acre parcel, located on the south side of Proctor Valley Road, between Hunte
Parkway and Duncan Ranch at the southerly boundary of Rolling Hills Ranch Neighborhood 8, from
Low Density Residential to Community Purpose Facility (CPF) and Park; and the land use
designation of a 3-acre parcel adjacent to the north from CPF to Park (see Locator).
Page 2, Item No.:
Meeting Date: 04/10/01
In accordance with Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines,
the Environmental Review Coordinator prepared an addendum (IS-01-29) to FSEIR-91-03. The
addendum was approved by the City Council on December 19, 2000 in conjunction with the Park
Agreement, which required these amendments. Therefore, no further environmental review is
required, and no further action is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the proposed GDP, SPA and PC District Regulations amendments in accordance with
the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the attached City Council Resolution and
Ordinance.
BOARDS AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
On March 28, 2001, the Planning Commission considered the proposed project and, after hearing
staffs' and applicant's presentations, approved the project by a 6-0 vote, subject to conditions.
DISCUSSION:
The Rolling Hills Ranch, which is a master planned community consisting of approximately 1,200
acres, was approved for 2,662 dwelling units in 1992. Rolling Hills Ranch is located in the northeast
portion of Chula Vista on either side of East 'H' Street/Proctor Valley Road, and the intersection of
Hunte Parkway (see Locator).
As you may know, City staff is presently processing the replannlng of the eastern 940 acres of
EastLake known as EastLake IlL As part of the Replanning Program, The EastLake Company
suggested several alternatives in order to satisfy the parkland requirement for the northerly-260 acres
known as the Woods Neighborhood. One of the alternatives included the payment of park acquisition
and development (PAD) in-lian fees for the Woods neighborhood, and allows the City to use the in-
lieu fees to purchase a 7-acre residential parcel located immediately adjacent to the north (within the
Rolling Hills Ranch Planned Community). Under this alternative, an adjacent Community Purpose
Facility site located immediately north and the residential parcel are rearranged to annex the
additional acreage to the Salt Creek Community Park to the north.
Based on current Parks and Recreation Department policy to develop larger park facilities, instead of
several small ones, and the proximity of the Woods Neighborhood to the Salt Creek Ranch
Community Park, city staf£ and EastLake representatives decided to pursue the above-mentioned
alternative involving the Rolling Hills Ranch 7-acre residential site.
On December 19, 2000, the City of Chula Vista, The EastLake Company and Pacific Bay Homes
entered into an agreement to acquire the above-mentioned 7-acre residential site. Under this
agreement, EastLake agreed to provide the funds for the acquisition of said property and the City
agreed to grant park acreage credit equal to the amount of'net usable park acreage on the additional
parkland. I fas a result o£calculating net usable park acreage the EastLake III project does not satisfy
the project park acreage requirement, EastLake will be able to pay in-lieu fees for the deficiency on
Page 3, Item No.:
Meeting Date: 04/10/01
park acreage. Additionally, to complement the public park requirements, a private recreational
facility is included within the Woods neighborhood.
EastLake and Pacific Bay Homes agreed to file an application to amend the GDP, SPA and
associated regulatory documents to reflect the above-mentioned land use changes and parcel
reconfiguration. The proposed GDP and SPA amendments, as described in this report, reflect the
Park Agreement deal points and the Salt Creek Ranch park expansion conceptual design.
1. Existing Site Characteristics
The project site involves Low Density Residential (0~3 du/ac) and a Community Purpose
Facility (CPF) site within Neighborhood 8 of the Rolling Hills Ranch master planned
community, which is located south of Proctor Valley Road, east of Hunte Parkway and west
of Duncan Ranch Road (see Locator). The residential parcel located at the southerly
boundary of Neighborhood 8 is a 7-acre irregular shaped lot with tentative map approval for
21 single-family lots. The CPF parcel, located adjacent to the north of the 7-acre parcel, is a
3-acre rectangular shaped lot with frontage along Hunte Parkway and Duncan Ranch Road
(see Attachment 3A). Adjacent land uses include single residential detached homes to the
east, north and west, and a future junior high school within the EastLake planned community
to the south.
2. SPA Land Use Designations and Land Use
CV Municipal Code Salt Creek SPA Existing
Zoning Land Use Designation Land Use
Site PC, Planned SF 1, Residential
Community Single Family Detached Vacant
CPF, Community Purpose
Facility Vacant
North PC, Planned OS 2 Open Space (Park) Vacant
Community
South PC, Planned PQ-2, Public/Quasi
Community Future Jr. High School Vacant
(EastLake Woods)
West PC, Planned OS I Open 8pace
Community (Salt Creek OS Corridor) Vacant
East PC, Planned SF 1, Residential
Community Single Family Detached Vacant
Page 4, Item No.:
Meeting Date: 04/10/01
3. Proposed Amendments
The amendments involve the realignment and land use change between an existing 3-acre
Community Purpose Facility (CPF) site and a 7-acre Low Density Residential site. The
requested GDP & SPA amendments are as follows:
Salt Creek Ranch General Development Plan:
· Change an approximate 7-acre parcel, located at the southerly boundary of Neighborhood
8, from Low Density Residential (0-3 du/ac) to Community Purpose Facility (CPF) and
Park.
· Change a 3-acre CPF parcel adjacent to the north from CPF to Park.
· Change the GDP total number of permitted dwelling units from 2,824 to 2,810 and
reduce overall density accordingly.
· Amend all other text, tables and exhibits in the GDP to reflect the change in land use to
the GDP map and text described above.
Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan:
· Change an approximate 7-acre parcel from Single-Family Detached (SF 1) to
Community Purpose Facilities (CPF) and Park (OS 2).
·Change a 3-acre parcel adjacent to the north from CPF to Park (OS 2).
· Amend all other text, tables and exhibits in the SPA Plan to reflect the land use changes.
Planned Community Land Use District Regulations (map):
· Change the westerly 3 acres of the 7-acre parcel from Single-Family Detached (SF 1) to
Community Purpose Facilities (CPF).
· Change the easterly 4 acres of the 7-acre parcel from Single-Family Detached (SF 1) to
Park (OS 2).
· Change a 3-acre parcel adjacent to the north from CPF to Park (OS 2).
· Change the land use boundaries to reflect the above GDP and SPA amendments (all total
number of dwelling units, density and statistics).
Page 5, Item No.:
Meeting Date: 04/10/01
4. Analysis:
Thc Park Agreement, approved by City Council last December, provides for the expansion of the
existing 22-acre community park site within Neighborhood to satisfy park requirements for the
EastLakc Woods neighborhood. However, to implement the Park Agreement, the applicant agreed
to process a GDP and SPA amendment.
This amendment involves changing the land use designation of approximately 10 acres, involving a
7-acre Residential parcel and a 3-acre CPF site, both located south of Proctor Valley Road, east of
Huntc Parkway and west of Duncan Ranch Road at the southerly boundary of Neighborhood 8. The
westerly 4 acres of thc 7-acre parcel is proposed to be changed from Low Density Residential (0-3
du/ac) to Community Public Facilities (CPF). The easterly 3 acres of thc same parcel is proposed to
be changed from Single-Family detached to Park. The northerly adjacent 3-acre parcel is proposed
to be changed from CPF to Park (see Attachment 3A and 3B).
The 7-acre residential parcel, which has been approved for 21 single-family lots, is located between
two non-residential land uses: a future middle school to thc south and a future community purpose
facility to the north. The northerly and southerly residential edges of this parcel would require a
special treatment, such as sound walls, building orientation, landscape treatment, crc., to physically
and visually buffer the non-residential and more intense activities of the northerly and southerly
adjacent land uses (see Locator).
Thc proposed conversion of this residential parcel to park improves the land use relationship of the
area west of Duncan Ranch Drive. The residential component to thc east would be buffered by
Duncan Ranch Drive, a Class III Collector Street, providing a more appropriate transition between
thc residential and non-residential land uses in this neighborhood (see Attachment 3B).
As mentioned above, the Parks and Recreation Department has advocated thc use of larger park
facilities to provide a central location for ball fields and other recreational facilities. Thc larger parks
also provide larger visual and physical open space, which serve as community identification and
focal points. For this reason, city staffhas worked closely with both master developers to expand the
community park size and bc able to provide additional recreational facilities and amenities.
Parks and recreational facilities for thc Woods neighborhood would bc provided by the eXpanded
Salt Creek Ranch Community Park to thc north, The EastLake Trails neighborhood park (25 acres)
to the southwest and a 1.7-acre private recreational facility for the exclusive use of Woods residents.
Both community public parks (within Rolling Hills Ranch and EastLake Trails) are located within 1-
2 mile distance from the Woods neighborhood.
The Parkland Acquisition Fees have been paid and Development Fees will be paid for the additional
park acreage to ensure that the expansion of the park can be developed to satisfy local park and
recreational needs. The City's Traffic Engineer has determined that the park increase will not result
in additional traffic volumes that could impact traffic thresholds, because the street and
thoroughfares within the Salt Creek Ranch SPA plan are suitable and adequate to carry the
anticipated traffic flow.
Page 6, Item No.:
Meeting Date: 04/10/01
The General Plan designation for both, Residential and Community Purpose Facility sites is Low
Density Residential (0-3 du/ac). However, since conununity parks and community facilities are
permitted in any zone subject to a conditional use permit, the GDP and SPA, as proposed to be
amended, are consistent with the City's General Plan.
The proposed land use change will eliminate approximately 7 acres designated as Low Density
Residential (0-3 du/ac), and decrease the number of permitted dwelling units in the GDP and SPA by
21. The CPF acreage will remain unchanged. Park acreage will increase by 7 gross acres.
In order to ensure that the proposed amendments to the GDP, SPA plan and PC District Regulations
are complied with, the applicant has been conditioned to provide and obtain approval by the Director
of Planning and Building Director for all necessary changes to the adopted Salt Creek Ranch GDP,
SPA documents, maps, text and exhibits in a supplemental document prior to the issuance of the first
building permit. Also, all remaining conditions of Salt Creek Ranch SPA plan Resolution 16555
not modified by this amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
5. Conclusion:
For the reasons mentioned above, staff recommends approval of the project subject to the conditions
listed in the attached City Council Resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT
The applicant has paid for all cost associated with the processing of the SPA amendment and will be
responsible for paying corresponding Development Impact fees and other applicable development
and processing fees, as they may be amended from time-to-time.
Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Resolution
2~ Locator
3. Figures
4. Ownership Disclosure Statement
H:\IIOME\PLANN1NG\StanD\RoIling Hills Ranch\PCM 01-19 Park-CPF SPA Amendment\PCM 01-19 RHR CPF-PARK CC Agenda 10 April.
01.doc
ATTACHMENT i
RESOLUTION NO. PCM-01-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AMENDMENTS
TO THE SALT CREEK RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN,
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF
A 7-ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PROCTOR VALLEY
ROAD, BETWEEN HUNTE PARKWAY AND DUNCAN RANCH ROAD, FROM
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY AND
PARK; AND THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A 3-ACRE PARCEL
ADJACENT TO THE NORTH FROM COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY TO
PARK-PACIFIC BAY HOMES.
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a GDP and SPA amendment was filed with the
Planning and Building Department on Febmary 14, 2001, by Pacific Bay Homes ("Developer"); and,
WHEREAS, said application requests approval of amendments to the Salt Creek Ranch
General Development Plan (GDP), Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area and (SPA) plan and
Planned Community District Regulations in order to change the Land Use Designation of a 7-acre
parcel from Low Density Residential (0-3 du/ac) to Community Purpose Facility (CPF) and Park;
and the land use designation of a 3-acre parcel adjacent to the north from CPF to Park. ("Project);
and,
WHEREAS, the 1 O-acre project site is located south of Proctor Valley Road, east of Hunte
Parkway and west of Duncan Ranch Road within Neighborhood 8 of Salt Creek Ranch Planned
Community ("Project Site"); and,
WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Coordinator prepared an addendum in
conjunction with FSEIR-91-03. The addendum was approved by the City Council on December 19,
2000 with the Park Agreement. Therefore, no further environmental review is required, and no
further action is necessary; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and
notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of
general circulation in the City and it mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property, at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the heating was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m.,
March 28,2001, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and
said hearing was thereafter closed.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has previously considered FSEIR-91-03 and
addendum, and therefore, no further environmental action is necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANN1NG COMMISSION hereby
recommends that the City Council adopt the attached draft City Council Resolution and Ordinance
approving the GDP, SPA and PC District Regulations amendments in accordance with the fmdings
and subject to the conditions contained therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution and ordinance be transmitted
to the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 28~' day of March, 2001, by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Thomas, Castaneda, Willett, McCann, Cortez, O'Neill
NOES:
ABSENT: Hall
ATTEST:
Diana Vargas, Secretary Bob Thomas, Chairperson
H:\HOM E\PLANNIG\Stan D\Rolling Hills Ranch\PCM 01-19 Park-CPF SPA Amendment\PCM 01-19 PCReso 28 March 01.doc
ATTACHMENT 2
ROLLINGRANCH HILLS /
FUTURE
EASTLAKE JR HIGH EASTLAKE
SCHOOL
BUSINESS WOODS
CENTER
EASTLAKE
GREENS
EASTLAKE EASTLAKE
VISTAS
r CHULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR PROJECT Pacific Bay Homes PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT:
SO. Of Proctor Valley Rd. MISCELLANEOUS
PROJECT Between Hunte PIo, vy &
ADDRESS: Request: Amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch GDP, SPA, and PC
Duncan Ranch Road District Regulations to change a 7 acre parcel from Low Density
SCALE: FILE NUMI~ER: Residential to Community Purpose Facility (CPF) and Park; and an
· NORTH No Scale PCM-01-19 adjacent 3 acre parcel from CPF to Park.
h:\home\planning\carlos\locators\pcm0119.cdr 03.14,01
^TTACHRENT 3A
ROLLING HILLS RANCH
FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
(21 DU'S)
EASTLAKE
BUSINESS
CENTER II
SCHOOL
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT
~pR~LLi~CATNT: Pacific Bay Homes PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
~ PROJECT So. Of Proctor Valley Rd Between Adopted Land Use
LOCATION:
Hunte Pkwy & Duncan Rd.
SCALE: I FILE NUMBER:
None] PCM- 01 - 19
ATTACHMEN~,,3B
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT '
APPLICANT: Pacific Bay Homes PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
( PROJECT So, Of Proctor Valley Rd Between Proposed Land Use
LOCATION: Hunte Pkwy & Duncan Rd.
SCALE: I FILE NUMBER:
NoneI PCM - 01 - 19
Appendix B ATTACHMEH .
THE CITY CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATL .ENT
~u are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments,
;r campaign contributions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the part of the City
Gouncil, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
t. List the names of all persons having financial interest in the property which is the subject of the
application or the contract, e.g., owner applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier.
2. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or padnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest
in the partnership.
3. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of
any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of
the trust.
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees, and Council within the past twelve months? Yes __ No ~
If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or
independent contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes __ No __ If yes, state which
Councilmember(s):
(NOTE: ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGE~Y)
Date: ~,~/:N,~q. LI jN,IL~ ~.~j ~ ~001 ~ ~ ~~
~ig ~contractor/applicant
~rint or Wpe name of contractor/applicant
* ~erson is defined as: "Any individual firm, co-partnership, joint venture, associalion, social club, ~eaternal organ&ation, co¢oratio~
estate, tmst, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, ci~ and count~, ci~ municipaJt~, distrtct, or other polttical subdivision, or any
other group or combination acting as a untt."
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE SALT CREEK RANCH GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN 1N
ORDER TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A 7-ACRE PARCEL,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD, BETWEEN
HUNTE PARKWAY AND DUNCAN RANCH ROAD, FROM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY AND PARK; AND THE
LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A 3-ACRE PARCEL ADJACENT TO THE NORTH
FROM COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY TO PARK.
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land, which is subject matter of this Resolution is diagrammatically
represented in Exhibit "A", and for the purpose of general description herein consists of a 7-acre
and a 3-acre parcel, located south of Proctor Valley Road, east of Hunte Parkway and west of
Duncan Ranch Road ("Project Site"); and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2001, a duly verified application was filed with the City of
Chula Vista Planning & Building Department by The EastLake Company ("Developer"),
requesting approval of amendments to the Salt Creek Ranch General Development Plan (GDP),
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Planned Community District Regulations in order to
change the land use designation of a 7-acre parcel from Low Density Residential to Community
Purpose Facility (CPF) and Park; and the land use designation a 3-acre CPF parcel adjacent to
the north from CPF to Park ("Project); and,
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various
entitlements, including: 1) a General Development Plan, Salt Creek Ranch General Development
Plan, previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15875 ("GDP") on October 2, 1990; 2)
a Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area Plan ("SPA")
previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 16555 on March 24, 1992; 3) Planned
Community District Regulations, Salt Creek Ranch Planned Community District Regulations; 4)
Design Guidelines, Salt Creek Ranch Design Guidelines; and 5) Public Facilitites Finance Plan,
Salt Creek Ranch Public Facilities Financing Plan all previously approved by City Council
Resolution 16555 and Ordinance 2499 on March 24, 1992; Salt Creek Ranch Air Quality
Improvement Plan (AQIP approved by Resolution No. 16555; 6) Tentative Subdivision Map for
Salt Creek Ranch, Chula Vista Tract 92-02 previously approved by City Council Resolution
16834 on October 6, 1992 and amended on June 13, 2000 by City Council Resolution 2000-190;
and,
D. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on March
28, 200I and, after hearing staffpresentation and public testimony, voted 6-0 to recommend that
the City Council approve the Project, in accordance with the findings and subject to the
conditions listed below.
E. City Council Record of Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista on April 10, 2001 on the Project, and to receive the
recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same;
and,
WHEREAS, the city clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said SPA amendment
application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a
newspap~er of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 ft. of
the exterior boundary of the project at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m. April 10,
2001 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was
thereafter closed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, determine and
resolve as follows:
II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public
hearing on the Project held on April 10, 2,001, and the minutes and resolutions resulting
therefrom are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding.
III. PREVIOUS EIR-91-03 AND ADDENDUM TO EIR~91-03 (Salt Creek Ranch SPA Final
Supplemental EIR-91-03) REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED; FINDINGS; APPROVALS
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has previously reviewed, analyzed, considered, and
certified FSEIR 91-03 for Salt Creek Ranch
IV. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
In accordance with Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines, the City Environmental Review Coordinator prepared an addendum (IS-01-29) to the
Final Salt Creek SEIR-91-03, which was approved by the City Council on December 19, 2000
with the approval of the Park Agreement. Therefore, no further environmental review is required,
and no further action is necessary.
V. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council finds that in accordance with Section 15164 of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City Environmental Review Coordinator prepared an
addendum (1S-01-29) to the Final Salt Creek SEIR-91-03, which was considered by the City
Council on December 19, 2000 with thc approval of the Park Agreement.
VI. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The City Council hereby finds and determines that the proposed amendments to the Salt Creek
Ranch General Development Plan, Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan and associated regulatOry
documents are consistent with the Chula Vista General Plan and other adopted City policies.
VII. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FINDINGS
A. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS DESCILIBED BY THE GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS IN CONFOPdVIITY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN
The proposed amendments to the Salt Creek Ranch General Development Plan reflects
the CPF re-alignment and additional Park acreage within a location containing land uses
nat are consistent with ali elements of the Chula Vista General Plan. Community parks
and community purpose facilities are permitted in any zone subject to a conditional use
permit (CUP). Since thc General Development Plan does not address CUPs or other
administration permits, the GDP, SPA and associated regulatory documents are in
substantial conformance with the General Plan.
B. PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CAN BE INSTALLED BY
ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIFIC USES OR SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA
PLANS WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLANNED
COMMUNITY ZONE.
The PC, Planned Community Zone, in conjunction with the Sectional Planning Area
(SPA) Plan was established for the subject site in 1992, in accordance with the adoption
of the existing Salt Creek Ranch General Development Plan in 1990.
C. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED PARK DEVELOPMENT, THAT SUCH
DEVELOPMENT WILL CONSTITUTE A PAR~ ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED
DESIRABILITY AND STABILITY; AND THAT IT WILL BE IN HARMONY WITH
OR PROVIDE COMPATIBLE VARIETY TO THE CHARACTER OF THE
SURROUNDING AREA AND THAT THE SITES PROPOSED FOR PUBLIC
FACILITIES SUCH AS SCHOOLS, PLAYGROUNDS AND PARKS, ARE
ADEQUATE TO SERVE THE ANTICIPATED POPULATION AND APPEAR
ACCEPTABLE TO THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION
THEREOF.
The expanded community park provides increased flexibility in park design and
desirability. The park is located adjacent to the Salt Creek Open Space corridor and a
future Jr. High School site, which are compatible with the existing adjacent park land use.
The expanded community park will increase the ability to service the surrounding
community. A Park Agreement was approved for the expansion by the City Council on
December 19, 2000. The public facilities planned for this project are addressed in the
Public Facilities Financing Plan and will be installed prior to or in conjunction with
development of the project.
VIH. APPROVAL OF GDP AMENDMENT
In light of the findings described herein, the amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch General
Development Area, in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", is hereby
approved.
IX. SPA AMENDMENT FINDINGS
A. THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN FOR SALT CREEK RANCH (AS
AMENDED) IS 1N CONFORMITY WITH THE SALT CREEK GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN.
At the same time, since the General Development Plan is being amended, the amended
Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, is consistent with the Salt Creek
Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) and the Chula Vista General Plan.
B. THE SALT CREEK KANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN, AS AMENDED
WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE
INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREAS.
The Salt Creek Ranch SPA plan amendment is consistent with the Salt Creek Ranch
Public Facilities Financing Plan, Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water Conservation
Plan and will, therefore, promote the orderly sequentialized development of the involved
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan areas.
C. THE SALT CREEK RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA, AS AMENDED WILL
NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL
ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
The amended Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan will not adversely affect surrounding
residential land uses to the east and north due to the proposed grade separation and open
space buffers, and separated by streets that are classified at a minimum Class III
Collector Street; and the additional park acreage is proposed adjacent to an existing area
planned for a community park. The residential parcel would have required a special
treatment, such as sound walls, building orientation, landscape treatment, etc., to
physically and visually buffer the non-residential uses and more intense activities
adjacent to the north and south. However, environmental quality is improved by the
increase of green open space, and the potential conflict with residential use has been
diminished with the change of residential use to park use for the proposed area.
D. 1N THE CASE OF PROPOSED PARK AND COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITIES
(CPF) USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROP1ATE IN AREA,
LOCATION, AND OVERALL DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE
SUCH AS TO CREATE A PARK AND CPF ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED
DESIRABILITY AND STABILITY; AND THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL
MEET PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THIS TITLE.
The amended Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan provides additional park acreage and
community purpose facilities adjacent to an area that was previously planned for such
uses. The additional park acreage will provide more flexibility in the overall design of the
community park. The CPF and Park use are located adjacent to each other, which will be
designed to serve the residents of Salt Creek Ranch and nearby neighborhoods in
accordance to development standards reflective of sustained desirability and stability.
Development regulations for the CPF and Park will be designed to meet the City of Chula
Vista Performance Standards prescribed in chapters 19.66 and 19.68 of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code.
E. IN THE CASE OF PARK AND CPF USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE
APPROPRIATE IN THE AREA, LOCATION AND OVER-ALL PLANNING TO THE
PURPOSE PROPOSED, AND THAT SURROUNDING AREAS ARE PROTECTED
FROM ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS FROM SUCH DEVELOPMENT.
The CPF and Park site are located adjacent to an area planned for Park usage, open space,
and a future Jr. High School, therefore, the Park expansion and CPF re-alignment will not
adversely affect surrounding areas.
F. 33vIE STREET AND THOROUGHFARES PROPOSED ARE SUITABLE AND
ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC THEREON.
The street and thoroughfares proposed within the Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan have been
planned and, according to the City's Traffic Engineer are suitable and adequate to carry
the anticipated traffic flow from the CPF and Park land uses.
G. ANY PROPOSED PARK AND CPF DEVELOPMENT CAN BE JUSTIFIED
ECONOMICALLY AT THE LOCATION (S) PROPOSED AND WILL PROVIDE
ADEQUATE PARK AND CPF USES NEEDED AT SUCH PROPOSED LOCATION
(s).
Parkland Acquisition Fees have been paid and Development Fees will be paid for the
additional park acreage. Therefore, the park expansion can be developed to satisfy local
park and recreation needs that are justified economically and needed at the proposed
location. The CPF site is consistent with the Public Facilities Financing Plan.
H. THE AREA SURROUNDING SAID DEVELOPMENT COULD BE PLANNED AND
ZONED IN COORDINATION AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPATIBILITY WITH SAID
DEVELOPMENT.
The proposed CPF and Park site are highly compatible with surrounding zoned Open
Space, Park, and Jr. High School; and nearby residential neighborhoods.
X. APPROVAL OF SPA AMENDMENT
In light of the findings described herein, the amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch Sectional
Planning Area (SPA) Plan, in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", is
hereby approved.
XI. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO SPA TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS
In light of thc findings described herein, the City Council does hereby approve amendments and
impose conditions to the Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan.
XII. SPA AMENDMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
t. Implement all remaining conditions of Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan Resolution 16555 not
modified by the Resolution, which shall remain in full force and effect.
2. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, prepare, submit and obtain approval by the
Director of Planning and Building of all necessary changes to the adopted Salt Creek
Ranch SPA documents, maps, text and exhibits in a supplemental document to reflect
Councils approval of this SPA amendment.
XIII. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented
and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained
accordin~g to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein
granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further
condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted,
institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages
for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the
City's approval of this Resolution.
XIV. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the
enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event
that any one or more terms, provision, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent
jurisdiction top be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be
automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ah initio.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter John M.Kaheny
Director of Planning & Building City Attorney
H:\HOM E\PLANNING\StanD\Rolling Hills Ranch\PCM 01-19 Park-CPF SPA Amendment~ CC Reso..doc
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT p~,. t~,- Bay Homes PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT: ....
PROJECT So. Of Proctor Valle)' Rd Beiween
LO~^T,ON: .u.,ePk~D.nca..~. Adopted Land Use
SCALE: I FILE NUMBER:
None I PCM-O~-~9 EXHIBIT - A
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT Pacific Bay Homes PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT So. Of Proctor Valley Rd BetweenProposed Land Use
LOCATION: Hunte Pkwy & Duncan Rd.
SCALE: I FILE NUMBER;
.one I PCM-O~-~9 EXHIBIT- B
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDiNANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROViNG AMENDMENTS TO THE SALT CREEK RANCH
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICTS REGULATIONS TO CHANGE THE
LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A 7-ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD, BETWEEN HUNTE
PARKWAY AND DUNCAN RANCH ROAD FROM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY AND PARK; AND
THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A 3-ACRE PARCEL ADJACENT TO
THE NORTH FROM COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY TO PARK.
L RECITA_LS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land which is subject matter of this Ordinance is
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit "A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference, and commonly known as portion of Salt Creek Ranch Neighborhood 8,
and for the purpose of general description herein, consists of a 7-acre parcel and an
adjacent 3-acre pamel, located south of Proctor Valley Road, east of Hunte Parkway and
west of Duncan Ranch Road ("Project Site"); and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2001, a duly verified application was filed with
the City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department by The EastLake Company
("Developer"), requesting approval of amendments to the Salt Creek Ranch General
Development Plan, Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan and Planned
Community District Regulations in order to change the land use designation of a 7-acre
parcel from Low Density Residential (0-3 du/ac) to Community Purpose Facility (CPF)
and Park; and the land use designation of a 3-acre parcel adjacent to the north from CPF
to Park ("Project); and,
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of
various entitlements, including: 1) a General Development Plan, Salt Creek Ranch
General Development Plan, previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15875
("GDP") on October 2, 1990; 2) a Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, Salt Creek Ranch
Sectional Planning Area Plan ("SPA") previously approved by City Council Resolution
No. 16555 on March 24, 1992; 3) Plarmed Community District Regulations, Salt Creek
Ranch Planned Community District Regulations; 4) Design Guidelines, Salt Creek Ranch
Design Guidelines; and 5) Public Facilities Finance Plan, Salt Creek Ranch Public
Facilities Financing Plan all previously approved by City Council Resolution 16555 and
Ordinance 2499 on March 24, 1992; Salt Creek Ranch Air Quality Improvement Plan
(AQIP approved by Resolution No. 16555; 6) Tentative Subdivision Map fo[ Salt Creek
Ranch, Chula Vista Tract 92-02 previously approved by City Council Resolution 16834
on October 6, 1992, and amended on June 13, 2000 by Resolution 2000-190; and,
D. Planning Commission Record on Applications
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public heating on the
Project on March 28, 2001 and after heating staff presentation and public testimony,
voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council approve the Project, in accordance with the
findings listed below; and,
E. City Council Record on Applications
;ArHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held
before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on April 10, 2001, on the Project and
to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public
testimony with regard to same; and,
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said Planned
Community Districts Regulations amendment application and notice of said heating,
together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general
circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 ft. of the exterior
boundary of the project at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
6:00 p.m., April 10, 2001, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City
Council and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
F. Discretionary Approvals Resolution and Ordinance
WHEREAS, at the same City Council meeting at which this Ordinance was
introduced for first reading (April 10, 2001), the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
approved Resolution No. by which it imposed amendments on the Salt Creek
Ranch General Development Plan, Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA)
plan; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 15164 of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City Environmental Review Coordinator prepared
an addendum (IS-01-29) to the Final Salt Creek SEIR-91-03, which was approved by the
City Council on December 19, 2000 with the approval of the Park Agreement.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required, and no further action is
necessary.
II NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find,
determine and ordain as follows:
A. Findings for Planned Community District Regulations Amendment
The City Council hereby finds that the proposed amendments to the Salt Creek Ranch
Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use Districts Map are consistent with
the City of Chula Vista General Plan, and public necessity, convenience, the general
welfare and good zoning practice support the amendment.
B. Approval of Zone Amendment
The City Council does hereby approve the amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch Planned
Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map as represented in Exhibit B.
III. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that adoption of this Ordinance is dependent upon
the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that
in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a
Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this Ordinance
shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio.
IV. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its
adoption.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter John Kaheny
Director of Planning City Attorney
H:\HOME~PLANNINGXStanD\Rolling Hills Ranch~PCM 0l-19 Park-CPF SPA Amendment\PCM 01-19.CC Ord.doc
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT Pacific Bay Homes PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
APPL)CANT:
PROJECT So. Of ProclorValleyRdBelween Adopted Land Use
LOCATION: Hunte Pkwy & Duncan Rd.
SCALE: I FILE NUMBER:
.o.e I PcM-o~-~9 EXHIBIT - A
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT Pacific Bay Homes PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT So. Of Proctor Valley Rd Between
LOCAT,ON: .uetePkwy&DuncanRd. Proposed Land Use
SCALE: ~ FILE NUMBER:
.o.e I PCM-O~-~9 EXHIBIT- B
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE SALT CREEK RANCH GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN IN
ORDER TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A 7-ACRE PARCEL,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD, BETWEEN
HUNTE PARKWAY AND DUNCAN RANCH ROAD, FROM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY AND PARK; AND THE
LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A 3-ACRE PARCEL ADJACENT TO THE NORTH
FROM COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY TO PARK.
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land, which is subject matter of this Resolution is diagrammatically
represented in Exhibit "A", and for the purpose of general description herein consists of a 7-acre
and a 3-acre parcel, located south of Proctor Valley Road, east of Hunte Parkway and west of
Duncan Ranch Road ("Project Site"); and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2001, a duly verified application was flied with the City of
Chula Vista Planning & Building Department by The EastLake Company ("Developer"),
requesting approval of amendments to the Salt Creek Ranch General Development Plan (GDP),
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Planned Community District Regulations in order to
change the land use designation of a 7-acre parcel from Low Density Residential to Community
Purpose Facility (CPF) and Park; and the land use designation a 3-acre CPF parcel adjacent to
the north from CPF to Park ("Project); and,
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various
entitlements, including: 1) a General Development Plan, Salt Creek Ranch General Development
Plan, previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15875 ("GDP") on October 2, 1990; 2)
a Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area Plan ("SPA")
previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 16555 on March 24, 1992; 3) Planned
Community District Regulations, Salt Creek Ranch Planned Community District Regulations; 4)
Design Guidelines, Salt Creek Ranch Design Guidelines; and 5) Public Facilitites Finance Plan,
Salt Creek Ranch Public Facilities Financing Plan all previously approved by City Council
Resolution 16555 and Ordinance 2499 on March 24, 1992; Salt Creek Ranch Air Quality
Improvement Plan (AQIP approved by Resolution No. 16555; 6) Tentative Subdivision Map for
Salt Creek Ranch, Chula Vista Tract 92-02 previously approved by City Council Resolution
16834 on October 6, 1992 and amended on June 13, 2000 by City Council Resolution 2000-190;
and,
D. Planning Commission Regord on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on March
28, 2001 and, after hearing staff presentation and public testimony, voted 6-0 to recommend that
the City Council approve the Project, in accordance with the findings and subject to the
conditions listed below.
E. City Council Record of Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista on April 10, 2001 on the Project, and to receive the
recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same;
and,
WHEREAS, the city clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said SPA amendment
application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 ft. of
the exterior boundary of the project at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m. April 10,
2001 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was
thereafter closed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, determine and
resolve as follows:
11. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public
hearing on the Project held on March 28, 2,001, and the minutes and resolutions resulting
therefrom are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding.
III. PREVIOUS EIR-91-03 AND ADDENDUM TO EIR-91-03 (Salt Creek Ranch SPA Final
Supplemental EIR-91-03) REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED; FINDINGS; APPROVALS
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has previously reviewed, analyzed, considered, and
certified FSEIR 91-03 for Salt Creek Ranch
1V. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
In accordance with Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines, the City Environmental Review Coordinator prepared an addendum (IS-01-29) to the
Final Salt Creek SEIR-91-03, which was approved by the City Council on December 19, 2000
with the approval of the Park Agreement. Therefore, no further environmental review is required,
and no further action is necessary.
V. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council finds that in accordance with Section 15164 of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City Environmental Review Coordinator prepared an
addendum (IS-01-29) to the Final Salt Creek SEIR-91-03, which was considered by the City
Council on December 19, 2000 with the approval of the Park Agreement.
VI. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The City Council hereby finds and determines that the proposed amendments to the Salt Creek
Ranch General Development Plan, Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan and associated regulatOry
documents are consistent with the Chula Vista General Plan and other adopted City policies.
VII. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FINDINGS
A. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS DESCRIBED BY THE GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN
The proposed amendments to the Salt Creek Ranch General Development Plan reflects
the CPF re-alignment and additional Park acreage within a location containing land uses
· at are consistent with all elements of the Chula Vista General Plan. Community parks
and community purpose facilities are permitted in any zone subject to a conditional use
permit (CUP). Since the General Development Plan does not address CLIps or other
administration permits, the GDP, SPA and associated regulatory documents are in
substantial conformance with the General Plan.
B. PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CAN BE iNSTALLED BY
ESTABLISI-IMENT OF SPECIFIC USES OR SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA
PLANS WITHiN TWO YEARS OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLANNED
COMMUNITY ZONE.
The PC, Planned Community Zone, in conjunction with the Sectional Planning Area
(SPA) Plan was established for the subject site in 1992, in accordance with the adoption
of the existing Salt Creek Ranch General Development Plan in 1990.
C. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED PARK DEVELOPMENT, THAT SUCH
DEVELOPMENT WILL CONSTITUTE A PARK ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED
DESIRABILITY AND STABILITY; AND THAT IT WILL BE iN HARMONY WITH
OR PROVIDE COMPATIBLE VARIETY TO THE CHARACTER OF THE
SURROUNDiNG AREA AND THAT THE SITES PROPOSED FOR PUBLIC
FACILITIES SUCH AS SCHOOLS, PLAYGROUNDS AND PARKS, ARE
ADEQUATE TO SERVE THE ANTICIPATED POPULATION AND APPEAR
ACCEPTABLE TO THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION
THEREOF.
The expanded community park provides increased flexibility in park design and
desirability. The park is located adjacent to the Salt Creek Open Space corridor and a
future Jr. High School site, which are compatible with the existing adjacent park land use.
The expanded community park will increase the ability to service the surrounding
community. A Park Agreement was approved for the expansion by the City Council on
December 19, 2000. The public facilities planned for this project are addressed in the
Public Facilities Financing Plan and will be installed prior to or in conjunction with
development of the project.
VIH. APPROVAL OF GDP AMENDMENT
In light of the findings described herein, the amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch General
Development Area, in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", is hereby
approved.
IX. SPA AMENDMENT FINDINGS
A. THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN FOR SALT CREEK RANCH (AS
AMENDED) IS 1N CONFORMITY WITH THE SALT CREEK GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN.
At the same time, since the General Development Plan is being amended, the amended
Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, is consistent with the Salt Creek
Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) and the Chula Vista General Plan.
B. THE SALT CREEK RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN, AS AMENDED
WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE
INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREAS.
q2qe Salt Creek Ranch SPA plan amendment is consistent with the Salt Creek Ranch
Public Facilities Financing Plan, Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water Conservation
Plan and will, therefore, promote the orderly sequentialized development of the involved
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan areas.
C. THE SALT CREEK RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA, AS AMENDED WILL
NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL
ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
The amended Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan will not adversely affect surrounding
residential land uses to the east and north due to the proposed grade separation and open
space buffers, and separated by streets that are classified at a minimum Class III
Collector Street; and the additional park acreage is proposed adjacent to an existing area
planned for a community park. The residential parcel would have required a special
treatment, such as sound walls, building orientation, landscape treatment, etc., to
physically and visually buffer the non-residential uses and more intense activities
adjacent to the north and south. However, environmental quality is improved by the
increase of green open space, and the potential conflict with residential use has been
diminished with the change of residential use to park use for the proposed area.
D. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED PARK AND COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITIES
(CPF) USES, q~IAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPIATE 1N AREA,
LOCATION, AND OVERALL DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE
SUCH AS TO CREATE A PARK AND CPF ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED
DESIRABILITY AND STABILIFX; AND THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL
MEET PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THIS TITLE.
The amended Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan provides additional park acreage and
community purpose facilities adjacent to an area that was previously planned for such
uses. The additional park acreage will provide more flexibility in the overall design of the
community park. The CPF and Park use are located adjacent to each other, which will be
designed to serve the residents of Salt Creek Ranch and nearby neighborhoods in
accordance to development standards reflective of sustained desirability and stability.
Development regulations for the CPF and Park will be designed to meet the City of Chula
Vista Performance Standards prescribed in chapters 19.66 and 19.68 of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code.
E. IN THE CASE OF PARK AND CPF USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE
APPROPRIATE IN THE AREA, LOCATION AND OVER-ALL PLANNING TO THE
PURPOSE PROPOSED, AND THAT SURROUNDING AREAS ARE PROTECTED
FROM ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS FROM SUCH DEVELOPMENT.
The CPF and Park site are located adjacent to an area planned for Park usage, open space,
and a future Jr. High School, therefore, the Park expansion and CPF re-alignment will not
adversely affect surrounding areas.
F. ~rlE STREET AND THOROUGHFARES PROPOSED ARE SUITABLE AND
ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC THEREON.
The street and thoroughfares proposed within the Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan have been
planned and, according to the City's Traffic Engineer are suitable and adequate to carry
the anticipated traffic flow from the CPF and Park land uses.
G. ANY PROPOSED PARK AND CPF DEVELOPMENT CAN BE JUSTIFIED
ECONOMICALLY AT THE LOCATION (S) PROPOSED AND WILL PROVIDE
ADEQUATE PARK AND CPF USES NEEDED AT SUCH PROPOSED LOCATION
(S).
Parkland Acquisition Fees have been paid and Development Fees will be paid for the
additional park acreage. Therefore, the park expansion can be developed to satisfy local
park and recreation needs that are justified economically and needed at the proposed
location. The CPF site is consistent with the Public Facilities Financing Plan.
H. THE AREA SURROUNDING SAID DEVELOPMENT COULD BE PLANNED AND
ZONED IN COORDINATION AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPATIBILITY WITH SAID
DEVELOPMENT.
The proposed CPF and Park site are highly compatible with surrounding zoned Open
Space, Park, and Jr. High School; and nearby residential neighborhoods.
X. APPROVAL OF SPA AMENDMENT
In light of the findings described herein, the amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch Sectional
Planning Area (SPA) Plan, in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", is
hereby approved.
XI. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO SPA TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS
In light of the findings described herein, the City Council does hereby approve amendments and
impose conditions to the Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan.
XII. SPA AMENDMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Implement all remaining conditions of Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan Resolution 16555 not
modified by the Resolution, which shall remain in full force and effect.
2. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, prepare, submit and obtain approval by the
Director of Planning and Building of all necessary changes to the adopted Salt Creek
Ranch SPA documents, maps, text and exhibits in a supplemental document to reflect
Councils approval of this SPA amendment.
XIII. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented
and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained
accordin~g to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein
granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further
condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted,
institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages
for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the
City's approval of this Resolution.
XIV. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the
enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event
that any one or more terms, provision, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent
jurisdiction top be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be
automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter John ~ql:I~atie'"ny
Director of Planning & Building City Attorney
H:\HOME\PLANNING\StanD\Rolling Hills Ranch\PCM 0 I-I 9 Park-CPF SPA Amendment\ CC Reso..doc
ORDiNANCE NO.
AN ORDiNANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROViNG AMENDMENTS TO THE SALT CREEK RANCH
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICTS REGULATIONS TO CHANGE THE
LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A 7-ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD, BETWEEN HUNTE
PARKWAY AND DUNCAN RANCH ROAD FROM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY AND PARK; AND
THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A 3-ACRE PARCEL ADJACENT TO
THE NORTH FROM COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY TO PARK.
I. RECITA~LS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land which is subject matter of this Ordinance is
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference, and commonly known as portion of Salt Creek Ranch Neighborhood 8,
and for the purpose of general description herein, consists of a 7-acre parcel and an
adjacent 3-acre parcel, located south of Proctor Valley Road, east of Hunte Parkway and
west of Duncan Ranch Road ("Project Site"); and,
'~ B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2001, a duly verified application was filed with
the City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department by The EastLake Company
("Developer"), requesting approval of amendments to the Salt Creek Ranch General
Development Plan, Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan and Planned
Community District Regulations in order to change the land use designation of a 7-acre
parcel from Low Density Residential (0-3 du/ac) to Community Purpose Facility (CPF)
and Park; and the land use designation ora 3-acre parcel adjacent to the north from CPF
to Park ("Project); and,
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of
various entitlements, including: 1) a General Development Plan, Salt Creek Ranch
General Development Plan, previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15875
("GDP") on October 2, 1990; 2) a Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, Salt Creek Ranch
Sectional Plarming Area Plan ("SPA") previously approved by City Council Resolution
No. 16555 on Marcl-~ 24, 1992; 3) Planned Con'nnunity District Regulations, Salt Creek
Ranch Planned Community District Regulations; 4) Design Guidelines, Salt Creek Ranch
Design Guidelines; and 5) Public Facilities Finance Plan, Salt Creek Ranch Public
Facilities Financing Plan all previously approved by City Council Resolution 16555 and
Ordinance 2499 on March 24, 1992; Salt Creek Ranch Air Quality Improvement Plan
(AQIP approved by Resolution No. 16555; 6) Tentative Subdivision Map for Salt Creek
Ranch, Chula Vista Tract 92-02 previously approved by City Council Resolution 16834
on October 6, 1992, and amended on June 13, 2000 by Resolution 2000-190; and,
D. Planning Commission Record on Applications
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the
Project on March 28, 2001 and after hearing staff presentation and public testimony,
voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council approve the Project, in accordance with the
findings listed below; and,
E. City Council Record on Applications
~gHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held
before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on April 10, 2001, on the Project and
to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public
testimony with regard to same; and,
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said Planned
Community Districts Regulations amendment application and notice of said heating,
together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general
cimulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 ft. of the exterior
boundary of the project at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the heating was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
6:00 p.m., April 10, 2001, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City
Council and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
F. Discretionary Approvals Resolution and Ordinance
WHEREAS, at the same City Council meeting at which this Ordinance was
introduced for first reading (April 10, 2001), the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
approved Resolution No. by which it imposed amendments on the Salt Creek
Ranch General Development Plan, Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA)
plan; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 15164 of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City Environmental Review Coordinator prepared
an addendum (IS-01-29) to the Final Salt Creek SEIR-91-03, which was approved by the
City Council on December 19, 2000 with the approval of the Park Agreement.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required, and no further action is
necessary.
II NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find,
determine and ordain as follows:
A. Findings for Planned Community District Regulations Amendment
The City Council hereby finds that the proposed amendments to the Salt Creek Ranch
Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use Districts Map are consistent with
the City of Chula Vista General Plan, and public necessity, convenience, the general
welfare and good zoning practice support the amendment.
B. Approval of Zone Amendment
The City Council does hereby approve the amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch Planned
Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map as represented in Exhibit B.
III. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that adoption of this Ordinance is dependent upon
the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that
in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a
Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this Ordinance
shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio.
IV. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its
adoption.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter Joh~I~heny
Director of Planning City Attorney
H:\HOME\PLANNING\StanD\Rolling Hills RanchkPCM 01-19 Park-CPF SPA Amendment\PCM 01-19.CC Ord.doc
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT Pacific Bay Homes PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT So. Of ProclorVal,eyRdBetween Adopted Land Use
LOCATION: Hunte Pk',vy & Duncan Rd.
SCALE: I FILE NUMBER:
No.eI PCM-01-~9 EXHIBIT ' A
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT Pacific Bay Homes PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT So. Of PrcctorVal,eyRdBetweenProposed Land Use
LOCATION: Hunte Pkwy & Duncan Rd.
~O^~E~ I ~,~E.~ER: EXH I B IT B
None PCM - 01 - 19 '"
I
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ] ~
Meeting Date 4/10/01
ITEM TITLE: A) Resolution Approving Final Maps of Chula Vista
Tract No. 92-02, Salt Creek Ranch, Neighborhood 8, Units 1 and 2,
accepting on behalf of the City of Chula Vista a portion of Duncan
Ranch Road and the various public easements, all as granted on said
maps within said subdivisions, and approving the Subdivision
Improvement Agreements for the completion of improvements
required by said Subdivisions and authorizing the Mayor to execute
said Agreements.
B) Resolution Approving Supplemental Subdivision
improvement Agreement for Chula Vista Tract No.92-02, Salt Creek
Ranch, Neighborhood 8, Units 1 and 2 requiring Pacific Bay
Properties to comply with certain unfulfilled conditions of
Resolutions 16834 and 2000-190 and authorizing the Mayor to
execute said Agreement.
SUBMITTED BY: D~rector ofPubhc Wor
REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~ (4/5tbs Vote: Yes NoX)
On October 6, 1992, by Resolution 16834, City Council approved the Tentative Subdivision Map for
Chula Vista Tract No. 92-02, Salt Creek Ranch ("Project"). Said Tentative Map was approved ba~sed
on certain conditions in which Pacific Bay Properties, A California Corporation ("Developer")
agreed to comply with and which were established by said Resolution. The neighborhood
boundaries were delineated on said Tentative Map. The Final Maps for Neighborhood 8, Units 1 and
2, and the Subdivision Improvement Agreements and Supplemental Subdivision Improvement
Agreement for said neighborhood are now before Council for consideration and approval. It shall be
noted that approval of the subject final maps and agreements is contingent upon the approval of the
Salt Creek Ranch SPA plan amendment being considered before Council tonight.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolutions approving: (A) the Final Maps and
Subdivision Improvement Agreements; (B) the Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
and authorizing the Mayor to execute said Agreements for Salt Creek Ranch, Neighborhood 8, Units
1 and2.
BOARD/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: Not Applicable
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
DISCUSSION:
Final Maps
Neighborhood 8, Units 1 and 2 are the second set of final maps for Phase 2 of the Salt Creek Ranch
Development (also -known as the Rolling Hills Ranch Development). Neighborhood 8 is generally
located south of Proctor Valley Road and east of Hunte Parkway (see Attachment 1). The final maps
for each unit consist of the following:
Number of Number of Number of Lots Number of
Final Map Residential Lots for Open for Public Park Lots for a Total Acreage
Lots Space, Public Purposes Community
Uses Purpose
Facility Site
Neighborhood 8, 0 1 1 (27.553 AC) 1 (3.000 AC) 45.494
Unit 1
Neighborhood 8, 139 22 0 0 72.195
Unit 2
TOTALS 139 23 1 (27.553 AC) 1 (3.000 AC) I 117.689
Plats for Neighborhood 8, Units 1 and 2 are attached as Attachment 2A and 2B, respectively.
The fmal maps for the two subdivisions have been reviewed by the Department of Public Works m~d
Department of Plarming & Building and found to be in substantial conformance with the approved
Tentative Map. Approval of the maps constitutes acceptance by the City of all drainage, sewer, tree
planting & maintenance, landscape buffer & sidewalk, general utility, and general access easements
within each of the corresponding subdivisions. Approval of the final maps also constitutes
acceptance, on behalf of the public, of the following streets:
FINAL MAP DEDICATED STREETS
Neighborhood 8, Unit 1 No streets dedicated with this map.
Neighborhood 8, Unit 2 Portion of Duncan Ranch Road.
Irrevocable Offer(s) of Dedication
At this time, the City is acknowledging the Irrevocable Offer(s) of Dedication (IOD's) for Lot "A"
(Neighborhood 8, Unit 1) and Lot "A" (Neighborhood 8, Unit 2) for open space and other public
purposes. The remaining open space lots shown on the final maps before Council today for approval
were not offered IOD's to the City because they will be private open space. However, all open space
lots will be maintained by the Rolling Hills Ranch Home Owner's Association (HOA). An IOD for
the proposed City park site (Lot "B', Neighborhood 8, Unit 1) was previously offered by the
Developer in order to satisfy the park land acquisition fee component of the Park Acquisition and
Development (PAD) fee associated with the Project and to satisfy a portion of Condition No. 69 of
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 4/10/01
Resolution 16834. Construction of the City park site is addressed in the Supplemental Subdivision
Improvement Agreement (SSIA) before Council today. It should be noted, however, that under
Section 7050 of the Government Code of the State of California, the aforementioned offers of
dedication remain open and subject to future acceptance by the City.
Final Map Agreements
The developer has executed Subdivision Improvement Agreements for each of the two maps and has
provided bonds to guarantee construction of the required improvements and to guarantee the
subdivision monumentation. The developer has paid all applicable fees. The Subdivision
Improvement Agreements are attached and bonds are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
The improvement securities to guarantee labor, material, faithful performance, and monumentation
are as follows:
Public Improvements Labor & Materials Faithful
Performance Monumentation
Neighborhood 8, Unit 1 $352,650.00 $352,650.00 $10,000.00
Neighborhood 8, Unit 2 $1,713,280.00 $1,713,280.00 $10,000.00
The developer has also executed one Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the two
maps in order to satisfy Tentative Map Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 27, 55, 60, 61, 69, 70, 71,
73, 83, 87, 93, 94, 102, 108, 121,123, 124, 125 and 126 of Resolutions 16834 and 2000~190 for
Chula Vista Tract No 92-02, Salt Creek Ranch. Resolution 2000-190 limits the number of units
which may be mapped before certain street improvements have been constructed. These maps are in
compliance with the threshold set forth.
The Developer has agreed, unless otherwise conditioned, to comply with all unfulfilled conditions of
approval of the Salt Creek Ranch Tentative Map, Tract 92-02 established by Resolutions 16834
approved by Council on October 6, 1992 and 2000-190 approved by Council on June 13, 2000.
The Developer's Disclosure Statement is attached as Attachment 4.
FISCAL IMPACT: None to the General Fund. All staff costs associated with processing of
Improvement plans and final maps will be reimbursed from the Developer's deposits.
Attachments: Attachment 1: Salt Creek Ranch Location Map
Attachment 2A: Plat- Salt Creek Ranch Neighborhood 8, Unit 1
Attachment 2B: Plat- Salt Creek Ranch Neighborhood 8, Unit 2
Attachment 3: Developer's Disclosure Statement
[FILE NOS. 0600-80-RH210F AND 0600-80-RH2 i IF]
H:\HOME\ENGINEER\LANDDEV\Rolling Hills Ranch\CASFMRHRN8UI&2.get.doc
A ,mT-ACHMEN~- ~ /
SALT CREEK RANCH
NEIGHBORHOOD 8 UNIT 2
40o 0 4oo 80o 1200
HUNSAKER SCALE l" = 400'
& ASSOCIATES
SALT CREEK RANCH
NEIGHBORHOOD 8 UNIT 1
400 0 400 800 1200
= 400'
HUNSAKER SCALE 1"
ASSOCIATES
R:\OII9\OI19YO19 - I~0. 141J-47 '~
If shy pecan* ~ ;?.~ F.w~nt to (1) above Js a ~Zml~O~t o~..; ,=Hon or a ~ust. 1/st the ~ of
serving as ~ of the non-pratt org~i,~Hon or as mmme or bcmefi~iary or txustor of tl~ Izuzt.
4. Have y~a 1~i m~re than $'250 wroth of bm/ness tmmac~i with any member of ~ Ci~ s~, ~,
~,-,~, Co~, ~ ~ ~h~ ~ ~ ~e~e ~? Ym~ No~ ~ y~, p~ ~
~s):_
5. p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~g ~, ~, co~dt.~s, or ~ Co~o~ who
6. ~vo~~ o~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ t~n $1,~ ~ a C~ ~
H:~IOML~ENGINEER~LANDDHV~FORMS~DISCLOSE.FRM
RESOLUTION NO..
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING FINAL MAPS OF CHULA VISTA
TRACT NO. 92-02 SALT CREEK P~ANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 8,
UNITS 1 AND 2, ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY A
PORTION OF DUNCAN RANCH ROAD AND THE VARIOUS
PUBLIC EASEMENTS, ALL AS GRANTED ON SAID MAPS
WITHIN SAID suBDIvISIONS, AND APPROVING
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS FOR THE
COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS, AIqD AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista does hereby finds that certain map survey
entitled Chula Vista Tract 92-02 Salt Creek Ranch, Neighborhood
8, Unit 1, and more particularly described as follows:
Being a subdivision of a portion of section
26, Township 17 South, Range One West, San
Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Chula
Vista, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to the United States
Government Survey thereof.
Area: 45.494 acres No. of Lots: 3
Numbered Lots:l Lettered Lots:2
is made in the manner and form prescribed by law and conform to
the surrounding surveys; and that said map and subdivision of
land shown thereon is hereby approved and accepted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Council hereby accepts on
behalf of the City of Chula Vista the sewer easement with the
rights of ingress and egress for the installation and
maintenance of public sewerage facilities, the drainage and
access easements easements with the rights of ingress and egress
for the installation and maintenance of public drainage
facilities, and the recreational trail easements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED said Council hereby
acknowledges on behalf of the City of Chula Vista, the
Irrevocable Offer of Grant of Fee Interest in Lot "A" for open
space and other public purposes as shown on this map within this
subdivision, noting that Section 7050 of the Government Code of
the State of California provides that such offers of dedication
may be accepted at any future time by the City Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of
Chula Vista be, and is hereby authorized and directed to endorse
upon said map the action of said Council; that said Council has
approved said subdivision map, and that those certain easements
with the right of ingress and egress for the installation and
maintenance of sewerage facilities and drainage facilities as
well as the recreational trail easements, as granted thereon and
shown on said map within said subdivision are accepted on behalf
of the City of Chula Vista as hereinbefore stated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be, and is
hereby directed to transmit said map to the Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that that certain Subdivision
Improvement Agreement, a copy of which shall be kept on file in
the office of the City Clerk for the completion of improvements
in said subdivision, is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista does hereby finds that certain map survey entitled
Chula Vista Tract 92-02 Salt Creek Ranch, Neighborhood 8, Unit
2, and more particularly described as follows:
Being a subdivision of a portion of section
26, Township 17 South, Range One West, San
Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Chula
Vista, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to the United States
Government Survey thereof.
Area: 72.195 acres No. of Lots: 165
Numbered Lots: 139 Lettered Lots: 26
is made in the manner and form prescribed by law and conform to
the surrounding surveys; and that said map and subdivision of
land shown thereon is hereby approved and accepted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Council hereby accepts on
behalf of the City of Chula Vista a portion of Duncan Ranch
2
Road; a 5.5 foot easement with the right of ingress and egress
for the construction and maintenance of tree planting along
Duncan Ranch Road, the sight visibility easements with the
rights of ingress and egress within Lots
"Q", "R" and '~S", and the assignable and irrevocable general
utility and access easements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED said Council hereby acknowledges on
behalf of the City of Chula Vista, the Irrevocable Offer of
Grant of Fee Interest in Lots "A", "B", "C", nE", ~F", "Q", "R",
and "S" for open space and other public purposes as shown on
this map within this subdivision, noting that Section 7050 of
the Government Code of the State of California provides that
such offers of dedication may be accepted at any future time by
the City Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the Cit~ of
Chula Vista be, and is hereby authorized and directed to endorse
upon said map the action of said Council; that said Council has
approved said subdivision map, and that said public street is
dedicated for public use, and that those certain easements with
the right of ingress and egress for the construction and
maintenance of street tree planting, sight visibility and
general utility and access, as granted thereon and shown on said
map within said subdivision are accepted on behalf of the City
of Chula Vista as hereinbefore stated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be, and is
hereby directed to transmit said map to the Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that that certain Subdivision
Improvement Agreement, a copy of which shall be kept on file in
the office of the City Clerk for the completion of improvements
in said subdivision, is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula
vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Subdivision Improvement Agreements on behalf of the City of
Chula Vista.
3
Presented by Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt John M. Kaheny
Director of Public Works City Attorney
4
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT
NO. 92-02, SALT CREEK RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 8,
UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUIRING PACIFIC BAY HOMES TO
COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNFULFILLED CONDITIONS OF
RESOLUTIONS 16834 AND 2000-190 AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, Pacific Bay Homes has executed a Supplemental
Subdivision Improvement Agreement to satisfy remaining conditions
of City Council Resolution Nos. 16834 and 2000-190.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the Supplemental
Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Chula Vista Tract No. 92-02,
Salt Creek Ranch, Neighborhood 8, Units 1 and 2, a copy of which
shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula Vista is hereby authorized to execute said Agreement on
behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
Presented by Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt J~y
Director of Public Works City Attorney
[H:/HOMELATTORNEY/RESO\ssia SCR Neighborhood 8 Units I and 2 (April 5, 2001 (12:15PM)]