Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 2000/12/19
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA December 19, 2000 6:00 p.m. · Council Chambers Public Services Building 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista CI'IY OF CHULA VISTA City Council City Manager Patty Davis David D. Rowlands, Jr. Stephen C. Padilla City Attorney Jerry R. Rindone John M. Kaheny Mary Salas City Clerk Shirley A. Horton, Mayor Susan Bigelow The City Council meets regularly on the first calendar Tuesday at 4:00 p.m. and on the second, third and fourth calendar Tuesdays at 6:00 p.m. Regular meetings may be viewed at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesdays on Cox Cable Channel 24 or Chula Vista Cable Channel 47 December 19, 2000 I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Chula Vista In the AGENDPffice of the City Clerk and that I posted this . 't1ocument on the bulletin board according to Brown Act requirements. 61.P,M. Dated /~/S Gil Signed -If'. '., r '_/ I I CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Davis, Padilla, Rindone, Salas, and Mayor Horton. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY · PRESENTATION BY BOB MCALISTER AND DAN HOM FROM CITIZENS FOR 125 CONSENT CALENDAR (Items I through 13) The Council will enact the staff recommendations regarding the folloWing items listed under the Consent Calendar by one motion, without discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or City staff requests that an item be removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of October 17 and December 5, 2000. Staffrecommendation: Council approve the minutes. 2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter from the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in Closed Session on December 12, 2000, there were no actions taken which are required under the Brown Act to be reported Staff recommendation: The letter be received and filed. 3. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $107,209.34 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND AND AWARDING A PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO DION INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $107,209.34 FOR A STREET PATCH TRUCK, THROUGH A COOPERATIVE PURCHASE WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) During Fiscal Year 1999/2000, purchase of a patch truck was approved for its normal replacement cycle for the Street Maintenance Section of Public Works Department. However, this patch truck was not purchased in Fiscal Year 1999/2000. Municipal Code Section 2.56.140 and Resolution No. 6132 authorize the Purchasing Agent to participate in cooperative bids with other government agencies for the purchase of materials of common usage. The City, therefore, is participating in a current City of San Diego bid from Dion International Trucks, Inc. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 4. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $71,872.91 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE SEWER FUND AND AWARDING A PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO DION INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS, INC., 1N THE AMOUNT OF $419,472.91 FOR TWO VACTOR COMBINATION SEWER FLUSHER TRUCKS THROUGH A COOPERATWE PURCHASE WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO (4/STHS VOTE REQUIRED) The City is participating in a current City of San Diego bid from Dion International Trucks, Inc., for the purchase of two vactor sewer combination trucks. Municipal Code Section 2.56.140 and Resolution No. 6132 authorize the Purchasing Agent to participate in cooperative bids with other government agencies for the purchase of materials of common usage. There are no vendors in Chula Vista that normally fumish this type of heavy equipment. (Director of Public Works) Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 5. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS (PROJECT JY-065-G), AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO INCREASE VALUE OF CONTRACT TO EXPEND ALL AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR THIS PROJECT On October 25, 2000, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the sidewalk replacement project (JY-065-G) at various locations in the City. The work consists of the removal and replacement of displaced curbs, gutters, sidewalks and driveways. It includes excavation and grading, PCC sidewalks, driveways, curbs and gutters, asphalt concrete pavement, removal and disposal of existing improvements, traffic control, protection and restoration of existing improvements, other miscellaneous work, and all labor, material, equipment and transportation necessary for the project. (Director of Public Works) Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the resolution and award the contract to Jimenez, Inc. dba MJC Construction of Chula Vista for $79,706.45. 6. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SIDEWALK REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY (STL-266) AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO INCREASE VALUE OF CONTRACT TO EXPEND ALL AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR THIS PROJECT On November 1, 2000, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the project, which consists of the removal and replacement of displaced curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveways. The work includes excavation and grading, PCC sidewalks, driveways, curbs and gutters, asphalt concrete pavement, removal and disposal of existing improvements, traffic control, protection and restoration of existing improvements, other miscellaneous work, and all labor, material, equipment and transportation necessary for the project. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution and award the contract to Portillo Concrete, Incorporated of Chula Vista for $175,627.50. 7. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF ORANGE AVENUE, BETWEEN FOURTH AVENUE AND FIFTH AVENUE (STL-228) On November 15, 2000, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements along the north side of Orange Avenue, between Fourth and Fifth Avenues (Project STL-228). The work to be done involves the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements, bus pads, pedestrian ramps, driveways, cross- gutters, and new mailboxes. The work also includes all labor, material, equipment, transportation, protection of existing improvements, and traffic control. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution and award the contract to Pullman Engineering, Inc. of S an Diego in the amount o f $151,117.46. 8. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AWARDING A THREE-YEAR AGREEMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DELINQUENCY MONITORING TO MUNIFINANCIAL, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT The proposed agreement will retain the services of MuniFinancial, Inc. to perform delinquency monitoring services on existing City assessment districts and coordinate the collection of all delinquent installment payments on the districts, as requested by the City, for the period of January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003, plus services for delinquencies occmTing in prior years. Approval of the agreement will ensure that the City's fiduciary responsibility to the bondholders is fulfilled by providing these required services. All costs associated with the collection of delinquent assessments are recovered from the delinquent property owners at no expense to the City. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 9. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A DETENTION BASIN MAINTENANCE, GRADING MITIGATION AND EROSION, SEDIMENTATION AND STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL LLC, AND AUTHORIZiNG THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT The resolution approves an agreement with NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, the developer of San Miguel Ranch, setting forth the obligations of the developer for implementing grading mitigation measures, constructing and maintaining de-silting basins and other erosion and storm water pollution control measures required by the project's tentative map conditions of approval. (Director of Public Works) Page 3 - Council Agenda 12/19/00 Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 10. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING WAIVER OF THE LIEN PLUS INDEBTEDNESS TO VALUATION RATIO PORTION OF COUNCIL POLICY 505-03, APPROVING THE DEFERRAL AND LIEN AGREEMENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE THE LIEN AND DEFERRAL AGREEMENT FOR 48 WALNUT DRIVE Property owners Mario and Socorro Zugasti have requested a deferral for the installation of public improvements along their property at 48 Walnut Drive, Chula Vista, in the form ora lien deferral agreement. Council Policy 505-03 requires property owners to meet a certain limit of indebtedness to property value ratio in order to obtain deferrals in the form of lien deferral agreements. Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti do not meet these limits and have requested Council to approve a deviation to said policy to enable them to obtain a lien deferral agreement. (Director of Public Works) Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 11 A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING FINAL MAP OF CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 99-03, EASTLAKE TRAILS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOODS TN-1 AND TN-2, ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE VARIOUS PUBLIC STREETS AND EASEMENTS, ALL AS GRANTED ON SAID MAP WITHIN SAID SUBDIVISION, APPROViNG THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY SAID SUBDIVISION, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 99-03, EASTLAKE TRAILS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOODS TN-1 AND TN-2, REQUIRING THE EASTLAKE COMPANY TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNFULFILLED CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 19447, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT On May 4, 1999, by Resolution No. 19447, Council conditionally approved the Tentative Subdivision Map for Chula Vista Tract No. 99-03, EastLake Trails. The Final Map, Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement for EastLake Trails North Neighborhoods TN-1 and TN-2 (total of 73 single- family residences) are before Council for consideration and approval. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolutions. 12. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM FOR THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1, 2000 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2001, FOR CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROJECTS, UTILIZING FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FUNDING Page 4 - Council Agenda 12/19/00 All local agencies receiving federal-aid highway funds for the Federal Highway Administration are required to submit Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Programs. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 13. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE PARK AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, THE EASTLAKE COMPANY, AND PACIFIC BAY HOMES, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT This park agreement will allow The EastLake Company to purchase land from Pacific Bay Properties to satisfy EastLake Woods park acquisition obligation. (Director of Parks and Recreation) Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the resolution. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak to any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak"form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. 14. CONSIDERATION OF THE DECLARATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ITS INTENTION TO: (A) MAKE CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZE THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CERTAIN TERRITOPd~ES PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT IOTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 1 WEST & 2]), AND (B) MAKE CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZE THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CERTAIN TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-2 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 6 & 7]) On November 7, 2000, Council approved resolutions adopting two annexation maps showing the boundaries of the territories proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 98-1 and CFD No. 98-2, as applicable, and declaring its intent to authorize the annexation of certain parcels to such CFDs. Council also set a public hearing £or December 19, 2000 to hear any protest to the proposed annexations. Staff recommcndation: Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the following resolutions: A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 1 WEST & 2]), MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY Page 5 - CouncilAgenda 12/19/00 OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFiED ELECTORS OF CERTAIN TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITiES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 1 WEST & 2]) B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACTING AS THE LEGISLATiVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-2 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 6 & 7]), MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CERTAIN TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-2 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 6 & 7]) 15. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE 1999-2004 PLANNiNG PERIOD The State of California requires that all cities and counties prepare a Housing Element of their General Plan every five years. Furthermore, Government Code Section 65585.1 allows local governments within the San Diego Region to self-certify their Housing Element of their General Plan through a pilot program rather than submit the Element for review by the State Department of Housing and Community Development for determination of substantial compliance with the requirements of State Housing Element law. In accordance with State law, the City of Chula Vista has prepared the Housing Element update for the 1999-2004 planning period and intends to self-certify its 1999-2004 Housing Element of the General Plan under the provisions of Government Code Section 65585.1. (Director of Community Development) Staff recommendation: Council conduct the public heating and adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, iN COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65585.1, FOR THE 1999-2004 HOUSING ELEMENT CYCLE, AND ADOPTING A REVISED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS-00-08) ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussion and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the public. The Council will consider the items individually, and staJf recommendations may, in certain cases, be presented in the alternative. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. 16. CONSIDERATION OF A REPORT REGARDING ANNEXATION OF THE Page 6 - Council Agenda 12/19/00 APPROXIMATELY 743-ACRE SAN MIGUEL RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND TENTATiVE SUBDiVISION MAP PROJECT AREA TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, AND SATISFACTION OF THE SAN DIEGO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION'S RELATED CONDITIONS OF ANNEXATION APPROVAL The San Miguel Ranch project area is currently within the unincorporated County of San Diego and requires annexation to the City prior to the approval of any Final Subdivision Maps or the issuance of any grading or other permits for the project. Council previously approved the project's Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Public Facilities Financing Plan/Fiscal Impact Analysis (PFFP/FIA), and the Tentative Subdivision Map, on October 19, 1999 and February 29, 2000, respectively. The project is also located within the boundaries of the adopted County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan, South County Segment. Council's prior project approvals contained conditions to be satisfied prior to completion of the annexation of the project area. Those conditions concern MSCP requirements for an annexation agreement to be completed between the City, County, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department.of Fish and Game (CDFG) and the project applicant, NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC; and the need for the applicant to establish a mechanism satisfactory to the City to ensure mitigation of the project's forecasted annual fiscal deficit as identified in the PFFP/FIA. On April 3, 2000, the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) considered Trimark's annexation application and approved the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization (Ref. No. RO99-42) subject to two conditions; one regarding completion of the above-noted MSCP Annexation Agreement, the other regarding the property owner establishing and funding a mitigating mechanism to the City's satisfaction regarding the above-noted forecasted annual fiscal deficit. Staff has since been working with the County, USFWS, CDFG and the applicant to prepare the required MSCP Annexation Agreement, and under consideration are all items related to completing the project's annexation. (Director of Planning & Building) Staff recommendation: Council place the following ordinance on first reading, and adopt the resolutions: A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROViNG A MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM (MSCP) ANNEXATION AGREEMENT FOR THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH PROJECT AMONG THE CITY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, AND NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC, CONCERNING THE CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGICAL MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT, AND ADOPTiNG ADDENDUM IS-01- 032 TO THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENViRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND TENTATIVE MAPS (FSEIR 97-02) B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH FISCAL DEFICIT ACCOUNT, REQUIRiNG NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC, TO DEPOSIT AN iNITIAL Page 7 - CouncilAgenda 12/19/00 $10,000 iNTO SAID ACCOUNT PRIOR TO ANNEXATION, AND REQUIRING NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC, PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF ANY FiNAL SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE PROJECT, TO ESTABLISH AND FUND A PERMANENT MECHANISM TO PAY THE CITY FOR FiNANCING THE PREPARATION OF 15 ANNUAL FISCAL REVIEWS AND DEFICIT ANALYSES FOR THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH PROJECT, AND FOR ANY FISCAL DEFICITS IDENTiFIED BY THE ANNUAL REVIEWS AND ANALYSES C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH REORGANIZATION (REF. NO. RO99-42) INVOLVING THE ANNEXATION OF 742.94 ACRES TO THE CITY, THE DETATCHMENT OF 742.94 ACRES FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 135 (SAN DIEGO REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS), AND THE DETATCHMENT OF 1.03 ACRES FROM THE BONITA-SUNNYSIDE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO EXECUTION OF THE PROJECT'S REQUIRED MSCP ANNEXATION AGREEMENT D. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN iNDEMNiFICATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC, REGARDiNG THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGICAL MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR OTHER BUSINESS 17. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS A. Scheduling of meetings. 18. MAYOR'S REPORTS 19. COUNCIL COMMENTS CLOSED SESSION 20. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDiNG ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(b)(1) · California Native Plant Society, et al v. Bruce Babbitt, et al ADJOURNMENT to the Regular Meeting of January 9, 2001, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Page 8 - Council Agenda 12/19/00 ANN T. FATHY, AICP ATTORNEY AT LAw 701 KETTNER BLVD. #198 SAN DIEGO, CA92101-5933 http://www.landuse-ca.com 619-238-0504 FAX: 619-238-1918 afathy@landuse-ca.com December 18, 2000 Mayor Shirley Horton and Council Members City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Subject: Housing Element 1999-2004 I have reviewed the December 2000 draft Housing Element of the General Plan 1999- 2004 and find that it does not comply with California housing element law. The fact that the City of Chula Vista qualifies to self-certify its Housing Element does not relieve the City of the legal requirement to comply with state housing element law (Government Code section 65580 et seq.). HOMELESS My particular concern has to do with the Housing Element's failure to comply with the requirement to "to identify adequate sites which will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards and with public services and facilities needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including ... emergency shelters and transitional housing..." [Government Code section 65583( c)( 1) language applicable to the 1999-2004 housing element cycle.] In 1997, the Fourth District Court of Appeal in ruling on the adequacy of the City of San Diego's Housing Element, provided additional guidance as to what a local government must do to comply with this requirement. [See Hoffmaster v. Citv of San Diego (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 1098.] The Court's opinion in Hoffmaster applies to all cities and counties in the state. I recommend that your City Attorney review the Hoffmaster opinion and advise your staff on what actions need to be taken to bring the City's Housing Element into compliance with state law. Briefly, this is what is required: . An analysis of any special housing needs... [Government Code Section 65583(a)(6)] 1 Comment: Page 17 of the Housing Element states: "Within Chula Vista the homeless population is estimated at 500 urban homeless and 100 homeless day laborers. " . A statement of the community's goals, quantified objectives, and policies relative to the maintenance, preservation, improvement, and development of housing. [Government Code Section 65583(b)(1)] Housing element law recognizes that the total housing needs identified may exceed available resources and a community's ability to satisfy this need. [Government Code Section 65583(b)(2)] The Court said "the housing element must contain quantitative analyses supporting the conclusion the local government and the community cannot meet the acknowledged need..." Comment: Pages 84-86 of the Housing Element address Goal 5: "Enable Homeless Individuals and Families to Find Permanent Housing." Under this Goal are two five-year objectives: "5.1 Participate in Regional Efforts to Address Homeless Needs" and "5.2 Facilitate Local Facilities that Respond to Homeless Needs." Despite estimating a Chula Vista homeless population of 600 persons, the only quantified objective is "Construction of 10 transitional housing units." [See 5. 1] There is no analysis supporting the implied conclusion that the City cannot meet more of the acknowledged need. . A program which sets forth a five-year schedule of actions... [Government Code Section 65583(c)] Comment: The City's five-year schedule of actions does not commit the City to identify adequate sites for transitional housing and emergency shelters within the City of Chula Vista. "5.1.1 Support Existing Regional Services for the Homeless" focuses on unspecified financial support, and mentions winter shelter programs (vouchers and the Interfaith Shelter Network) which do not meet the objectives of housing element law because they are not year-round. "5.1.2 Participate in a Regional Approach to Address Homelessness" is nothing more than a statement of approach. "5.2.1 Evaluate and Identify Facilities and Services" is another general statement. This work should have been done as part of the Housing Element preparation. "5.2.2 Identify Non-profit Providers to Operate Emergency Shelter Programs" means nothing without an identification of sites for emergency shelter and transitional housing. 2 "5.2.3 Facilitate Shelters and Transitional Housing Programs" contains no commitment to actually initiate any actions to facilitate the siting of emergency shelters and transitional housing. "5.2.4 Group Homes for Six or Fewer Persons:" See discussion below under Fair Housing Law. . Identify adequate sites... [Government Code Section 65583(c)(1)] The Court provided guidance on this requirement with the following statements: "To substantially comply with the identification of adequate sites requirement of subdivision (c)(1) here, City must provide an inventory of sites which will be made available through features of its program to meet its quantified housing objectives as to the homeless. An adequate site is one available for immediate development, which is located within reasonable access to public agencies and transportation services; will not require unusually high site development costs; has available public services and facilities; is consistent with the General Plan designation and site zoning so as to permit the development of, conversion to or use of, a shelter or transitional housing without undue regulatory requirements, fire regulations and design standards." "Under section 65583, subdivision(c)(1), City must identify adequate sites which will be made 'available' though its action plan; it does not require City to designate geographic zones where shelter for the homeless may be built as a matter of right without a CUP, or for that matter, without complying with the underlying zoning of the area. That is, the waiver of a CUP requirement is not the sine qua non of an adequate action program." "For identification to be meaningful, it must necessarily be specific. It must set forth sites which will be available to be developed, without restrictive zoning burdens which combined with the NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) factor ... become insurmountable or produce protracted delays and deterrent cost increases. Available sites should be officially designated and publicized, preferably in the housing element, for this use. Finally, through its action program, City bears the responsibility to ensure the regulatory process actually encourages the development of emergency shelters and transitional housing." 3 Conclusion: The City's Housing Element 1999-2004 does not meet the requirements of state housing element law as it pertains to the needs of homeless individuals and families. FAIR HOUSING LAW The statement under "5.2.4 Group Homes for Six or Fewer Persons" reflects a provision of state law that was adopted prior to subsequent amendments to federal and state fair housing law providing protections to children ("familial status") and persons with disabilities. The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (FHAA) responded to testimony that persons with disabilities who may need or prefer to live in a "group home" (congregate living arrangement) were prevented from living in the housing of their choice in the community because of zoning restrictions on group homes. The FHAA prohibits such discrimination. Subsequently, state fair housing law was amended to be consistent with federal fair housing law. Government Code section 12955(1) states: [It shall be unlawful] To discriminate through public or private land use practices, decisions, and authorizations because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, marital status, disability, national origin, or ancestry. Discrimination includes, but is not limited to, restrictive covenants, zoning laws, denials of use permits, and other actions authorized under the Planning and Zoning Law (Title 7 (commencing with Section 65000)), that make housing opportunities unavailable. Under federal and state fair housing law, it is unlawful to use zoning practices to discriminate against group homes serving persons with disabilities, even when the home serves more than six persons. I would be happy to provide training to your staff on this issue. Sincerely, {L~ --;j. :;~7 Ann T. Fathy, AICP cc: Cathy Creswell, HCD 4 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA OCTOBER 17, 2000 6:00 P.M. A Regular Meeting of the City Council and an Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista were called to order at 6:04 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Davis, Moot, Padilla, Salas, and Mayor Horton (Deputy Mayor Moot arrived at 6:10 p.m.) Planning Commissioners Castaneda, Cortes, Hall, O'Neill, McCann, Willett, and Chair Thomas ((Commissioner Hall arrived at 6:44 p.m.) ABSENT: Councilmembers/Commissioners: None ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Rowlands, City Attorney Kaheny, City Clerk Bigelow PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY . OATH OF OFFICE: FRANCISCO GONZALEZ - BOARD OF ETHICS Mr. Gonzalez was not present. His Oath of Office was administered on October 13, 2000 in the Office of the City Clerk. . PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2000 AS "UNITED W A YICHAD CAMPAIGN MONTH" Mayor Horton read the proclamation, and Councilmember Padilla presented it to Planning & Building Director Bob Leiter, who thanked Council for its support of the program. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 through 11) I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 3, 2000 Staffrecommendation: Council approve the minutes. ( CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) 2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter from Henry's Marketplace requesting that the restricted two-hour parking on the north side of J Street be reconsidered. Staff recommendation: The item be referred to staff with direction to prepare a written response to Mr. Ron Cohn and the management team of Henry's Chula Vista stating that the item was heard by Council with several concerned citizens speaking to the issue, and Council will not reconsider the item. 3. ORDINANCE NO. 2826, ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2579 RELATING TO AN INTERIM PRE-SR-125 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE TO PAY FOR TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN THE CITY'S EASTERN AREA AND TO PAY FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ADVANCING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SR-125 (2ND READING AND ADOPTION) Chula Vista created an Interim Pre-SR-125 Development Impact Fee in November 1993 to provide a funding source to construct an interim roadway facility should SR -125 be delayed significantly. This was necessary in order to provide traffic capacity for future growth. (Director of Public Works) Staffrecommendation: Council place the ordinance on second reading for adoption. 4. ORDINANCE NO. 2825, ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING A 45 MPH SPEED LIMIT ON PROCTOR V ALLEY ROAD BETWEEN MOUNT MIGUEL ROAD AND HUNTE PARKWAY, ESTABLISHING A 45 MPH SPEED LIMIT ON HUNTE PARKWAY BETWEEN PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD AND OTAY LAKES ROAD, ESTABLISHING A 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT ON MACKENZIE CREEK ROAD BETWEEN MOUNT MIGUEL ROAD AND LANE A VENUE, AND ADDING THESE ROADWAY SEGMENTS TO SCHEDULE X OF A REGISTER MAINTAINED BY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER (2ND READING AND ADOPTION) Based on the provisions of Chapter 7, Article I of the California Vehicle Code, and pursuant to authority under Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 10.48.020, the City Engineer has determined that, in the interest of minimizing traffic hazards and traffic congestion and for the promotion of public safety, the speed limit on Proctor Valley Road between Mount Miguel Road and Hunte Parkway should be established at 45 MPH, the speed limit on Hunte Parkway between Proctor Valley Road and Otay Lakes Road should be established at 45 MPH, and the speed limit on Mackenzie Creek Road between Mount Miguel Road and Lane Avenue should be established at 25 MPH. The speed limits will be added to Schedule X of the register maintained in the office of the City Engineer. (Director of Public Works) Staffrecommendation: Council place the ordinance on second reading for adoption. Page 2 - Council/P1anning Commission Minutes 10/17/2000 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) 5 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-355, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION FOR TWO PARK PROJECTS B. RESOLUTION 2000-356, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING A GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $766,650 FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR TWO PARK PROJECTS (GREG ROGERS PARK AND LOMA VERDE PARK POOL); AND AMENDING THE CIP BUDGET TO INCREASE THE APPROPRIATIONS FOR THESE PROJECTS; AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO SIGN THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT THE GRANT FUNDS (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) The City has received notice of the award of grant funds from the State of California in the amount of $766,650, divided between two projects - the Lorna Verde Pool Renovation (PR226) for $482,650 and Greg Rogers Park (PRI69) for $284,000. The City must now submit an application for these grant funds to the State Department of Parks and Recreation in order to receive the funds. The State allows the City to apply for and accept the grant simultaneously. (Director of Parks and Recreation) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolutions. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-357, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS 17470 AND 17471, PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 3, 1994, WHICH ASSIGNED A PORTION OF THE WEST CURB LINE ALONG FOURTH AVENUE IN FRONT OF THE POLICE STATION AND A PORTION OF THE SOUTH CURBLINE ON DAVIDSON STREET BETWEEN FOURTH AVENUE AND FIG A VENUE TO PUBLIC PARKING, AND ESTABLISHING THAT PORTION OF PUBLIC PARKING AS ASSIGNED TO SPACE FOR "OFFICIAL VEHICLES ONLY" The Police Department has determined that as a result of increases in staffing, increases in police vehicles, and other expanded programs such as the successful Senior Volunteer Program, there is a critical need for additional parking spaces for official vehicles. Staff has recommended that the public parking area described in the resolution be reassigned for "Official Vehicles Use Only" to ease the parking shortage for the Police Department. This temporary change in parking would remain in effect until a new Police facility is completed, which is expected to occur in December 2002. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 7. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-358, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A PARCEL MAP FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 00-15, ACKNOWLEDGING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION (lOD) OF FEE INTEREST FOR OPEN SPACE AND OTHER PUBLIC PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP WITHIN SAID SUBDIVISION, AND VACATING AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF FEE INTEREST TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA OVER LOT "A" OF MAP NO. 13920 Page 3 - Council/Planning Conunission Minutes 10/17/2000 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) The proposed parcel map adjusts the property line between three existing parcels in the McMillin Otay Ranch project, with no new lots being created. Final planning and design efforts for the proposed subdivision require minor adjustments to residential Lot 48, Lot 54 and open space Lot A of Map No. 13920. By approving the proposed map, Council will vacate the IOD for the open space lot within the proposed map and replace it with an IOD consistent with the new lot configuration. In accordance with Section 7050 of the California Government Code and Chapter 4, Section 8335 of the California Streets and Highways Code, this type of vacation may be performed summarily through adoption of a resolution. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 8. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-359, RESOLUTION ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF A SLOPE EASEMENT WITHIN ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 640- 370-11 AT 1101 PASEO LADERA A request was received to vacate a slope easement belonging to the City within the property located at 11 0 I Paseo Ladera, owned by Paseo Ladera Partners. In accordance with Chapter 4, Section 8335 of the California Streets and Highways Code, this type of vacation may be performed summarily through adoption of a resolution ordering said summary vacation. (Director of Public Works) Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 9 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-360, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE APPROPRIATION OF $33,783.93 FROM THE PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND AND $30,659.18 FROM THE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND AND AWARDING PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR FIVE UTILITY TRUCKS B. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-361, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $32,167.69 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE SEWER FUND AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A UTILITY TRUCK FOR THE WASTEWATER SECTION (OPERATIONS) OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT C. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-362, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $32,167.68 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A UTILITY TRUCK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR SECTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Page 4 - Council/Planning Commission Minutes 10/17/2000 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) D. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-363, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $28,046.24 FROM THE PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A TRUCK FOR THE PARK MAINTENANCE SECTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT In Fiscal Year 1999/2000, a new utility truck was approved for the new utility mark-out crew for the Wastewater section (Operations) of the Public Works Department. However, the utility truck was not purchased in Fiscal Year 1999/2000. In Fiscal Year 1999/2000, a new utility truck was approved for its normal replacement cycle for the Construction & Repair section of the Public Works Department. However, this utility truck was not purchased in Fiscal Year 1999/2000. For Fiscal Year 2000/2001, one additional utility truck was approved for the Construction & Repair section. In addition, the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 equipment replacement budget provides for the replacement of one utility truck for the Construction & Repair section. One additional truck is being requested for the Park Maintenance section, due to growth. The bid was advertised in the Chula Vista Star News on August 25, 2000. Twenty-six bid packages were sent out and eight bidders responded. Two Chula Vista vendors were contacted, but only one submitted a bid. On September 19, 2000 the bids for the purchase ofthese vehicles were opened. (City Manager/Director of Public Works) Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the resolutions. 10 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-364, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REJECTING AND AUTHORIZING THE RE-BID OF ALL THE BIDS LISTED ON EXHIBIT "B" FOR THE RENOVATION AND EXPANSION WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS FACILITY AND CORPORATION YARD B. RESOLUTION no. 2000-365, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACTS AS DESIGNATED FOR AWARD ON EXHIBIT "A" FOR THE RENOVATION AND EXPANSION WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUTURE PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS FACILITY AND CORPORATION YARD, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACTS On September 26, 2000 Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2000-333 and 2000-334 approving the rejection, re-bid and award associated with the first set of bids for the corporation yard project. On October 10, 2000, Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2000-353 and 2000-354 approving the rejection, re-bid and award associated with the second set of bids for the Corporation Yard project. Approval of the first resolution rejects and authorizes the re-bid of certain trades necessary to complete the project. Approval ofthe second resolution accepts the lowest responsive bids and awards all the Page 5 - CouncillPlanning Commission Minutes 10/1712000 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) contracts as designated for award on Exhibit "A" covering some of the trade work associated with the construction of the Corporation Yard project. Staff intends to come back before Council on October 24th with a resolution accepting and awarding additional bids. The total contract value approved to date is $15,973,666. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolutions. 11 A. ORDINANCE NO. 2827, ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING TITLE 2 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 2.57, DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS, TO ESTABLISH THE PROCEDURE FOR THE SELECTION AND AWARD OF DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS B. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-366, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CERTIFYING THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/CONSTRUCTOR PRIORITY LIST AS THE QUALIFIED LIST OF DESIGN-BUILD ENTITIES In March 2000, the voters approved Proposition B, amending City Charter section 1009, Public Works Contracts, to allow the City to award contracts pursuant to the design/build project delivery system. Proposition B required the City to approve an implementing ordinance establishing the bidding and award procedures for this new process. (City Manager/Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council place the ordinance on first reading and adopt the resolution. ACTION: Mayor Horton moved to approve staff recommendations and offered the Consent Calendar, headings read, texts waived. The motion carried 5-0, except on Item No.1, which carried 4-0 with Deputy Mayor Moot not yet present. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Bruce Hunter, 758 Stone Canyon Road, representing homeowners of Rolling Hills Ranch, complained of the noise and lighting associated with the all-night operation of Con Way Western Express. He stated that the trucking company was in violation of its Conditional Use Permit, and he presented a petition signed by the property owners in the area. David Fithicen, 2638 El Granada Road, also complained about Con Way Express and its excessive operating hours. He asked Council to reconsider the Planning Commission's approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Susan Watry, 196 Guava Avenue, opposed the construction of the police facility in Friendship Park, stating that the park should be kept as a historical site. Page 6 - Council/Planning Commission Minutes 10/17/2000 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Continued) Hector Espinoza, Principal of Hilltop Middle School, commended the school teachers and students for their achievements with SAT scores. He stated that the passage of Proposition BB on the November ballot is critical in order to improve school facilities. Mike Diaz, 89 East Paisley, asked Council to look at alleged Charter violations with respect to the upcoming election. Mayor Horton stated that the City Attorney would be forwarding a report to Council on the matter within the next week. PUBLIC HEARINGS 12. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF THE CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN The MSCP Subregional Plan is a comprehensive, long-term habitat conservation planning program that addresses the habitat needs of 85 sensitive plant and animal species through preservation of native vegetation communities within southwestern San Diego County. The MSCP allows local jurisdictions to maintain land use control and development flexibility while creating a plan to mitigate for the potential loss of Covered Species and their habitat due to the direct impacts of future development. The City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan will allow the City to issue permits for development projects that may impact Covered Species. Implementation of the MSCP Subarea Plan will also establish a "Preserve" for the permanent conservation of habitat lands. The Preserve is defined by mapped boundaries and/or quantitative targets for habitat conservation and will total approximately 4,700 acres within the City. The terms of implementation of the MSCP Subarea Plan will be addressed through an Implementing Agreement between the City and the Wildlife Agencies. (Director of Planning & Building) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and at the time specified in the notice. Planning & Building Director Leiter introduced the MSCP and Subarea Plan, a culmination of several years' work on the part of the City, and recognized the following staff and consultants who assisted with the project: Planning staff Duane Bazzel, Christina Clark, and Marilyn Ponseggi; Senior Assistant City Attorney Ann Moore; Laurie McKinley, lead consultant with MNA; Joe Monaco, representing environmental consultants Dudek and Associates; Tina Thomas and Renee Hawkins with Remy, Thomas and Moose; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service representative Nancy Gilbert; and Bill Tippets with the California Department ofFish and Game. Ms. McKinley explained the MSCP Subarea Plan and the program's goal to conserve an integrated network of habitat and open space for protection of significant biological resources throughout 900 square miles in the southwestern portion of the County. Based on the preserve collectively planned by twelve jurisdictions, the wildlife agencies have found that the habitat that will be conserved will ensure the long-term survival of 85 separate species. Ms. McKinley stated that the City would be authorized to issue "take" permits for the 85 species upon approval of the Subarea Plan by the wildlife agencies and accompanying ordinances. Page 7 - Council/Planning Commission Minutes 10/17/2000 PUBUC HEARINGS (Continued) Ms. McKinley explained that each Subarea plan is considered to be a separate Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, when considered separately, the City's Subarea Plan sufficiently protects 18 of the 85 MSCP covered species. She added that if permits associated with other MSCP Subarea Plans were to be revoked, the Chula Vista Subarea Plan would remain as a stand-alone HCP, and the City would retain coverage for the 18 specIes. Ms. McKinley described the three-part preserve assembly as being the covered projects area; Habitat Loss and Incidental Take (HUT) area outside the coastal zone; and HUT area inside the coastal zone. She added that in order for the City to receive "take" authority, three other implementing tools would need to be in place: an . amendment to the grading ordinance; a grazing abatement ordinance; and an implementing agreement. Ms. McKinley explained the preserve management funding and resources, stating that the estimated costs for accomplishing preserve management would be $50 per acre and would be assured through established financing programs in the three preserve management areas. Ms. McKinley added that biological management and maintenance in the central City preserve area will cost between $10 and $16 per acre, and possible funding resources may include grants, regional funding programs, the City's General Fund, and any other available funding resources. Commissioner Castaneda expressed concern with the language in the plan, the ability to provide equity, and the possible interruption of the plan by the Coastal Commission and state and federal agencIes. Mayor Horton opened the public hearing. Allison Rolfe, Executive Director of the Audubon Society, recommended against approval of the plan as it presently exists. She stated that the plan does not meet standards of the Endangered Species Act and lacks specificity with reference to the implementing agreements and special studies ordinances. She expressed concern with the conservation goals being defined as percentages and added that the program should be consistent with the Coastal Commission Act. She also recommended that a yearly report be prepared with reference to the implementing agreement, Sections 9.4 and 9.5. Councilmember Padilla requested confirmation from staff that the concerns raised by Ms. Rolfe were not in the existing public record. He expressed frustration that the Audubon Society was raising issues long after the close of the public review period and said he believed that both the City and wildlife agency staff had been working in good faith. Ms. McKinley reported that a Public Draft Report was issued in February 2000 for a 45-day public review. The Audubon Society was sent a letter in February, providing them with the opportunity to comment. Ms. McKinley stated that no letter was received from the Audubon Society at that time and added that the existing plan has more specificity than any other plan in the region. Page 8 - Council/Planning Commission Minutes 10/17/2000 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) Abel Parra, 845 East 8th Street, Suite C, National City, represented two property owners who reside adjacent to the plan area. He stated their concerns regarding the future development of their properties and their request that there be a buffer zone of 500 feet between the preserve and their property lines. Ms. McKinley responded that the property owners should be able to move forward with development under the new ordinances. Craig Benedetto, representing the Alliance for Habitat Conservation, presented a letter to the Council regarding the MSCP Subarea Plan approval; stated that the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly, a listed species, was not covered under the plan, which could have broad impacts to land owners in the jurisdiction; and recommended that the species be covered. He encouraged the City to insist that the critical habitat designation be removed from the plan area concurrently with approval and receipt of the "take" permit. Kim Kilkenny, representing Otay Ranch Company, encouraged the City to move forward with the adoption of the MSCP Plan. He stated that the plan is the best and most specific and detailed plan in the region and if the program were adopted, he would like to see the City receive permit authority by January 15, 2001. He recommended that Council ask the wildlife agency representatives what will be done to remove the critical habitat designation in conjunction with the adoption of the MSCP program and also emphasized the necessity to include in the City's legislative program constant communication with state and federal representatives to ensure that local jurisdictions continue to have control over their land use decisions. Michael Beck, representing the Endangered Habitats League, spoke regarding the HLIT Ordinance implementation plan and the need to review details of the various documents. He stated that the university site has always been a major issue, and when the proposal came forward to try to find a compromise to locate a university in Salt Creek, several issues arose: (1) that the sewer line not be located in Salt Creek unless it is proven that there is no feasible alternative; (2) that land use bubbles east of proposed SR-125 and within Otay Valley be eliminated; (3) that Otay Valley Road west of La Media is put out of Otay River Valley and up on the mesa; and (4) that the linkages to cornerstone lands in Salt Creek have some success criteria associated with them. He further spoke to a fundamental policy issue of what a large- scale conservation plan is and is not; and the necessity to ensure that the plan is consistent with various state and federal regulations and processes. He also mentioned the need for more information and clarification regarding enhancements. Deputy Mayor Moot agreed with some of Mr. Beck's comments and shared his concern about the relationship between the MSCP and agreements with Fish and Wildlife with respect to other agencies with authority, particularly the Environmental Protection Agency and Clean Water Act. He stated that the City has found that other acts and agencies have the potential to deprive the City of the benefits of the bargain and cited the extension of Olympic Parkway and the construction of SR-125 as examples. He believed that the City has acted in good faith and, despite the City's best efforts, he felt it was possible that other agencies were withdrawing some of the critical decision-making processes that would allow the City to achieve its vision. Page 9 - Council/Planning Commission Minutes 10/1712000 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) Mr. Beck responded that a conscious decision was made in 1993 not to include other regulatory agencies in the development of the Subarea Plan, and it was also understood and agreed that the processes required by other agencies would be above and beyond those contained in the plan, once adopted. Robert Pletcher, 2727 Hoover Avenue, National City, representing McMillin Companies, supported the plan and expressed the need for the City to stand behind the plan with reference to the removal of the critical habitat designation. He then introduced Mr. Hartzell of Hewitt and McGuire. Andrew Hartzell, of Hewitt & McGuire, 19900 McArthur Boulevard, Suite 1050, Irvine, explained a mechanism that would allow the designation to be removed, stating that the Fish and Wildlife Service could publish its notice in the Federal Register of receipt of the application and invite public comment and concurrently publish notice of its intent to exclude the area within the Chula Vista Subarea Plan on the basis that the Subarea Plan does provide for the conservation needs of the California Gnatcatcher. Assistant City Attorney Moore stated that the draft implementing agreement provides language regarding the automatic removal of the critical habitat designation upon the City's take authorization. The draft agreement will be negotiated with the wildlife agencies over the next few months. Councilmember Davis asked when the agency would publish the City's notice of application. Nancy Gilbert, representing the Fish and Wildlife Service, responded that the notice would not be published until the negotiations on the implementing agreement, as well as compliance with court ordered dates and timelines, were accomplished. Matthew Adams, representing the Building Industry Association, supported the adoption of the proposed resolutions and also the proposal of concurrent publications by the Fish and Wildlife Service. He cautioned that several issues still require resolution. Jim Whalen, representing Sempra Energy and Bella Lago, spoke in support of the plan and also supported withholding final approval until the permit matches the plan. He stated that the Department of Fish and Game and the Fish and Wildlife Service, rather than the Coastal Commission, are best equipped to handle habitat planning issues and also clarified the "no surprises policy" as a financial assurance only, whereby the city and property owners would not be responsible for fixing things that go wrong. Rikki Albertson, representing Otay Land Company and Home Federal, supported the MSCP but expressed extreme concern regarding the critical habitat designation and its possible impact on implementation of the Subarea Plan. She asked that Council approve the MSCP, make it clear that the critical habitat designation must be removed, and request that upper level Fish and Wildlife representatives make an immediate commitment to try to get the designation removed by January 15, 2001. Page 10 - CounciVPlanning Commission Minutes 10/17/2000 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) With no further members of the public wishing to speak, Mayor Horton closed the public hearing. In response to a question by Councilmember Davis, Ms. McKinley stated that Chula Vista's plan will protect 18 of the 85 species to be protected on a regional basis as long as other agencies continue to implement their plans. Mayor Horton asked the status of the MHCP plan in North County. Bill Tippets, California Department ofFish and Game, explained the status of the implementation of plans by the seven North County cities but stated that those plans will not affect Chula Vista. He further remarked that there is a great amount of specificity of detail for biology with regard to the City's projects, but Chula Vista will not get take authority until the HUT Ordinance is approved. He also commented that the Department is working to resolve the issues surrounding the Coastal Commission's position. Deputy Mayor Moot asked if the department had had recent consultations with EP A regarding EPA's position on the construction of SR-125 and its potential impact on the City's ability to assemble and ensure the financial viability of the creation of the preserve. Mr. Tippets responded that his department had had no direct contact in recent months. He explained that Fish and Wildlife has issued a biological opinion regarding SR-125 and because of that, his department can adopt the findings in that opinion and issue its take authorization based on the federal opinion as long as the department can find that there has been adequate conservation for the species. Deputy Mayor Moot expressed concern with EPA's position on SR-125, stating that SR-125 is critical to the land owners doing the development that will allow them to acquire the land that goes into the preserve. He expressed the need for a high level of cooperation between all the agencies in working quickly through the SR-125 issue. Commissioner Castaneda expressed concern that the HUT Ordinance might not receive approvals in time to meet the January 15, 2001 completion timeline. Director of Planning & Building Leiter explained that all of the policy issues have been addressed in the plan, and the ordinances will be more procedural in nature, setting forth the permitting process. The ordinances will be reviewed only to make sure they are consistent with the plan, rather than requiring a biological review. This process should expedite the review and approval of the ordinances. Commission Chair Thomas asked the impact on the plan, and how it would be managed, if a developer buys some land outside the preserve for mitigation. Planning & Building Director Leiter stated that staff is looking at the possibility of the sale of land within the Otay Ranch preserve for mitigation of projects outside Otay Ranch and is setting up a mechanism that would allow for that to occur. He stated that Fish & Wildlife would want to ensure that the City maintains a certain amount of control over the locations where the mitigation occurs so there is like-for-like mitigation. Ms. McKinley further explained that the habitat mitigation ratios were designed to discourage people from purchasing their mitigation land outside the preserve and to encourage it within the preserve. Page 11 - Council/Planning Conunission Minutes 10/17/2000 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) Commissioner Hall asked whether any funding sources had been identified to assist with the mandated program. Ms. McKinley responded that a state NCCP local assistance program does exist, and there is also the possibility of federal funding assistance. Mr. Tippets added that the State has instituted a $1.6 million per year NCCP local assistance grant program available to all NCCP participants who have approved plans or soon-to-be-approved plans; these funds can be used for a variety of functions within the approved plan area. Ms. Gilbert stated that the federal government has contributed to the MSCP preserve system, and various monies from the Endangered Species Act are passed on through the State for a variety of things such as acquisition or studies. Commissioner O'Neill asked if the City could predicate its approval contingent upon acceptance of the plan by the regulatory agencies by January 15th. Assistant City Attorney Moore responded that the City could condition an approval on anything in the best interests of the City but it might not achieve anything in the long run-. ACTION: Commission Chair Thomas moved to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. PCM-95-017, heading read, text waived. Commissioner McCann seconded the motion. Commissioner Castaneda asked that the motion be amended to include recommendations requesting that (I) staff obtain clarification on critical habitat designation issues; (2) Council consider asking legislative advocates to request that additional federal and state funding be made available for ongoing acquisition and maintenance of preserve areas; and (3) Council review and approve of the final fiscal impact analysis of the proposed Subarea Plan in light of current and forecasted economic and fiscal factors; issues to be considered in this analysis include, but are not limited to, the estimated completion schedules for key infrastructure proj ects that are planned for the study area, such as State Route 125 and the Salt Creek sewer interceptor project. The amendment to the motion was acceptable to its makers, and the City Clerk then read the resolution title: RESOLUTION NO. PCM-95-017, RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE MSCP SUBREGIONAL PLAN AS THE FRAMEWORK PLAN; ADOPT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN CONDITIONED ON THE FOLLOWING: I) THE FUTURE EXECUTION BY ALL PARTIES OF AN IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT, 2) THE ISSUANCE OF A BIOLOGICAL OPINION CONSISTENT WITH THE CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN AND THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT, AND 3) THE ISSUANCE OF TAKE PERMITS WITH CONDITIONS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN AND THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT; AND FIND THAT THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN AND AFFIRM ITS SUBMITTAL The motion carried 7-0. Page 12 - Council/P1anning Conunission Minutes 10/17/2000 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) Mayor Horton stated that the City is taking a giant step towards protecting a large portion of sensitive habitat for future generations and expressed the importance of learning to co-exist with the environment while protecting the needs of people. She commended staff, the consultants, the development community and the wildlife agencies for their cooperative efforts. Councilmember Davis expressed concern that other regulatory agencies have tried to usurp land use control from local jurisdictions. She stated that the City must maintain control over local land use decisions and also thanked staff and the consultants for their efforts. Deputy Mayor Moot stated that the recommended fiscal analysis is critical to the process, since unless SR 125 moves forward, the plan is at risk because the City would not be able to deliver land into the preserve. He expressed encouragement at the positive steps taken in working with U.S. Fish and Wildlife and stated that it was time to move forward. Councilmember Padilla congratulated everyone who has worked so diligently to this point but cautioned that there are still significant issues to be addressed. He stated that aside from the conservation and protection issues, the real value in proceeding in a process such as the MSCP comes from an understanding between federal, state and local regulatory agencies whose task it is to see to the preservation of particular species, habitats, areas and resources. Everyone needs a clear and upfront understanding of the processes involved to achieve the means to accomplish the conservation so that future, well-planned development can take place in a sensitive and sensible fashion. He stated that all hinges on the credibility and good faith of the parties involved. Councilmember Salas stated that Chula Vista would be viewed as a model community for implementing such a plan, and Chula Vista has done more than its fair share in preserving its natural resources. She also commented that the City needs predictability for future planning purposes and needs to balance the protection of the environment with creating quality living space for the community. In protecting precious natural resources but impeding the construction of necessary infrastructure, other quality of life areas are affected, and the environment is severely damaged when commutes become longer, when people have to sit in traffic for long periods, and when other resources are being diminished. Mayor Horton thanked Councilmember Salas for highlighting the consequences of not building SR-125, such as reduced air quality resulting from the congestion being experienced in all areas of South County. ACTION: Mayor Horton moved to direct staff to prepare a final fiscal impact analysis of the proposed Subarea Plan in light of current and forecasted economic and fiscal factors, with issues to be considered in the analysis to include, but not be limited to, the estimated completion schedules for key infrastructure projects that are planned for the study area, such as State Route 125 and the Salt Creek sewer interceptor project; and she offered Resolution No. 2000-367, heading read, text waived: Page 13 - Council/Planning Commission Minutes 10/17/2000 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) RESOLUTION NO. 2000-367, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE MSCP SUBREGIONAL PLAN AS THE FRAMEWORK PLAN; ADOPTING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN CONDITIONED ON THE FOLLOWING: I) THE FUTURE EXECUTION BY ALL PARTIES OF AN IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT, 2) THE ISSUANCE OF A BIOLOGICAL OPINION CONSISTENT WITH THE CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN AND THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT, AND 3) THE ISSUANCE OF TAKE PERMITS WITH CONDITIONS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN AND THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT; AND FINDING THAT THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN AND AFFIRMING ITS SUBMITTAL The motion carried 5-0. At 9:10 p.m., Mayor Horton declared a briefrecess. The meeting reconvened at 9:26 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. 13. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN UNIT 26 OF EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I, ZONE B EastLake Greens Unit 26 ("Unit 26") is located within EastLake Maintenance District No. I, Zone B. However, this property has not been previously assessed to finance the costs associated with the district because a final map had not yet been approved for Unit 26. On October 10, 2000, Council adopted three resolutions declaring the intent to levy annual assessments within Unit 26, setting the public hearing and initiating assessment ballot proceedings. (Director of Public Works) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and at the time specified in the notice. City Clerk Bigelow reported that there were two qualified electors and one ballot was received indicating an affirmative vote. Mayor Horton opened the public hearing. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Horton closed the hearing. ACTION: Councilmember Padilla offered Resolution No. 2000-368, heading read, text waived: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-368, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION WITHIN UNIT 26 OF EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I, ORDERING MAINTENANCE WORK THEREIN AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT THEREIN The motion carried 5-0. Page 14 - CouncillPlanning Connnission Minutes 10/17/2000 OTHER BUSINESS 14. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS There were none. 15. MAYOR'S REPORTS Mayor Horton thanked South Bay Community Services and City staff who organized and participated in the recent charity fashion show held in support of Casa Segura. Mayor Horton congratulated Councilmember Davis on the successful Christmas in October program. 16. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Davis invited the public to attend a live broadcast by Roger Hedgecock regarding the current energy crisis on Friday, October 20,2000, from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., at the Chula Vista Memorial Bowl. ADJOURNMENT At 9:30 p.m., Mayor Horton adjourned the meeting to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on October 23, 2000 at 4:00 p.m., and thence to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on October 23, 2000 at 6:30 p.m., and thence to the Regular Meeting of October 24, 2000, at 6:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, "'-- ---'lu. tLL- ~ .'{'~ Susan Bigelow, AAE, CMC, City Clerk Page 15 - Council/Planning Commission Minutes 10/1712000 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA December 5, 2000 4:00 P.M. A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 4: 14 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, ChuIa Vista, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Council members Davis, Moot, Padilla, Salas, and Mayor Horton ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Rowlands, City Attorney Kaheny, City Clerk Bigelow PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY . PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2000 AS "JOHN S. MOOT DAY" IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Mayor Horton read the proclamation, and Councilmember Padilla presented it to Deputy Mayor Moot. Mayor Horton also presented a plaque on behalf of Senator Steve Peace and the State of California, as well as parting gifts from the Council. . PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE TO COUNCILMEMBER MOOT BY STEVE MILLER ON BEHALF OF CHULA VISTA FIREFIGHTERS Steve Miller presented the plaque to Deputy Mayor Moot and thanked him for his support of the Chula Vista firefighters. . PRESENTATION TO COUNCILMEMBER MOOT BY BUDDY MAGOR ON BEHALF OF THE CHULA VISTA POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Lt. Magor presented parting gifts to Deputy Mayor Moot from the Chula Vista Police Officers Association and noted that a plaque was also being prepared. . COMMENTS BY OUT -GOING COUNCILMEMBER JOHN MOOT Deputy Mayor Moot thanked the Mayor, current and past Councilmembers, City staff, and the community; discussed some of the projects accomplished during his tenure on the Council; and expressed his vision that the Bayfront property be purchased and developed into a recreational park for the entire community. , SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (Continued) . RESOLUTION NO. 2000-431, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECITING THE FACTS OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY ON NOVEMBER 7, 2000 AND DECLARING THE RESULTS THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW The Registrar of Voters has transmitted the certified results of the Special Municipal Election held on November 7, 2000. Elections Code Section 15372 requires the City Clerk, as the elections official, to transmit the certified results to the Council. Elections Code Section 15400 requires the Council to declare the results of the election. The proposed resolution contains the official results as reported by the Registrar of Voters. (City Clerk) ACTION: Mayor Horton offered Resolution No. 2000-431, heading read, text waived. The motion carried 5-0. . OATH OF OFFICE FOR NEWLY ELECTED COUNCILMEMBERS MARY SALAS AND JERRY RINDONE TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE HONORABLE FEDERICO CASTRO The Honorable Judge Castro administered the oaths of office to Councilmembers Salas and Rindone, who then took their seats at the dais.. . COMMENTS BY COUNCILMEMBERS MARY SALAS AND JERRY RINDONE Councilmember Salas thanked all her supporters and stated that she was honored to serve the people of Chula Vista. She spoke of the City's rapid growth, emphasizing the importance of ensuring the construction of State Route 125. She expressed pride for advocating the establishment of a wildlife refuge and a Cultural Arts Center, and she pledged to work hard for the betterment of the community. Councilmember Rindone thanked his family, friends, and the voters for his successful return to the Council and dedicated his victory to the memories of his father and brother. He promised to represent the best interests of the citizens, ensure public safety, promote good ethics, work hard with the Council and make a difference in Chula Vista. . RECESS FOR RECEPTION FOR NEWLY ELECTED COUNCILMEMBERS At 5:20 p.m., Mayor Horton declared a recess for the reception. The meeting reconvened at 6:02 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Council members Davis, Padilla, Rindone, Salas, and Mayor Horton ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Rowlands, City Attorney Kaheny, City Clerk Bigelow p~(JP: ? ~ f'ollnc:il Minlltp:~ 17/0"/ ?OOO SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (Continued) . PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION TO THE EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH, LEILANI HINES, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST II, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Community Development Director Salomone introduced Leilani Hines. Mayor Horton read the proclamation, and Deputy Mayor Moot presented it to Ms. Hines. . PRESENTATION BY VIVACE, A CHULA VISTA VOCAL TRIO - INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMEMBER SALAS Councilmember Salas introduced the local vocalists, Trio Vivace, and the group performed two selections for the Council and audience. Ruth Arnett, a member of the trio, endorsed the creation ofthe City's proposed cultural arts center. . PRESENTATION OF HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2000 SEASON AT CHULA VISTA'S ATTRACTIONS: ARCO OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER, COORS AMPHITHEATRE, KNOTT'S SOAK CITY U.S.A., CHULA VISTA NATURE CENTER Representatives of each attraction, as well as the Chula Vista Convention & Visitors Bureau, presented their program highlights and accomplishments for 2000. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 through 16) I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meeting and Adjourned Regular Meeting of November 14, 2000. Staff recommendation: Council approve the minutes. 2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter from the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in Closed Session on November 14,2000, there were no actions taken which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. Staff recommendation: The letter be received and filed. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-432, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING A GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,902 FROM THE AGING AND INDEPENDENT SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY (ArS) FOR TELECONFERENCING EQUIPMENT TO ENABLE SENIOR SERVICES TO START A TELECONFERENCING PROGRAM FOR HOMEBOUND SENIORS AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES AND AUTHORIZING THE PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE SUCH AGREEMENT AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING UNANTICIPATED GRANT REVENUE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,902 (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) P::l(JP 1 ~ C'nllnr:il Minlltp,,- pm,/ ?OOO CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) The Parks and Recreation Department wishes to partner with Aging and Independent Services of San Diego County (AIS) to initiate a teleconferencing program for homebound seniors and persons with disabilities by accepting a grant from AIS in the amount of $1 0,902 for equipment and phone lines. Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-433, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CAFETERIA BENEFITS PLAN FOR 2001 The Internal Revenue Code requires that employers offering cafeteria plans under Section 125 have a written Plan Document and that the employer adopt the plan document annually. This resolution will fulfill this requirement. (Director of Human Resources) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-434, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DECLARING SPECIFIED VOLUNTEERS TO BE EMPLOYEES FOR THE PURPOSE OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE In order to limit a public agency's liability as it relates to persons who provide voluntary service without pay, it is necessary to distinguish between an employee and an independent contractor. The California Labor Code, Section 3363.5 permits public agencies to declare by resolution, for purposes of Workers' Compensation, that all or certain designated volunteers are employees of that agency while performing such services for the agency. This resolution will declare such for volunteers assigned to specific City programs whose names are included in the City-wide volunteer database and to members of all City boards and commissions. (Director of Human Resources) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-435, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS AS IMPRACTICAL, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH HARRELL & COMPANY ADVISORS, LLC FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES RELATED TO FINANCING THE POLICE HEADQUARTERS FACILITY AND CIVIC CENTER REMODELING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT The Police headquarters facility and Civic Center remodeling capital improvement projects are multi-million-dollar projects that will require long-term financing. The City has historically utilized the services of a financial advisory firm to provide added P~ap 4 _ ('ollndl Minlltp,< D/0,/7000 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) insurance that the costs of borrowing are minimized. On two other borrowings that were successfully concluded within the last ninety days, the Corporation Yard project and the Redevelopment Agency financial plan, two different financial advisory firms were chosen through the normal consultant selection process. Although both firms performed well on those assignments, due to the complex nature of the Agency transaction, Harrell & Co. was required to obtain a much more in-depth understanding of the City and is, therefore, recommended for appointment to this assignment without going through another formal selection process. (Deputy City Manager Powell) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 7.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-436, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH HIGHLAND PARTNERSHIP, INe. FOR THE PROGRAMMING AND PREPARATION OF A MASTER PLAN FOR THE NEW POLICE FACILITY AND CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX, APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) B. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-437, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REGARDING ITS INTENTION TO ISSUE TAX EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS TO FINANCE THE CITY'S NEW POLICE FACILITY AND CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION AND DIRECTING STAFF TO RETURN WITH A FINANCING PLAN At its October 23, 2000 workshop, Council directed staff to eliminate Friendship Park from further analysis for the siting of a new police facility. Council also directed staff to look at the other sites that had been previously considered and which will accommodate the police facility and program as descrihed by the consultants. It is staff's intent to reevaluate the sites using the relevant criteria, including proximity to the Civic Center and Third Avenue/Downtown corridor, consolidation of goverrunent services, facilitation of redevelopment efforts, ease of ingress and egress, and cost. The new direction to the consultant necessitates a change in the scope of work approved in the original agreement with Highland Partnership, Inc. (Assistant City Manager Morris) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolutions. 8. REPORT REGARDING EXTENDING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF CENTER STREET AND A PORTION OF CHURCH A VENUE FOR THE DOWNTOWN FARMERS' MARKET ON THURSDAY AFTERNOONS FOR A TWO-YEAR PERIOD, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND REQUESTING PERMISSION TO PROVIDE A RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE SITE IN FEBRUARY 2001 P~O-P .c; _ ('ollnc:il Mtnlltl"O;: PIO';i 7000 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) On November 14, 2000, Council approved an extension of the Downtown Farmers' Market to include the southernmost lane of Center Street from Church Avenue to Del Mar Street. Council amended the resolution to include the recommendation that staff look at alternative sites for the location of the Farmers' Market. To facilitate a more open layout, staff has identified three alternative sites for review. These include Park Way at Memorial Park, the parking lot south of Davidson on Landis A venue, and the parking lot north of Davidson on Landis Avenue. The alternative sites will be analyzed for environmental, traffic, safety, and financial impacts, along with citizen reviews. The Downtown Business Association and Town Centre I Project Area Committee must endorse the site. In addition, staff will analyze management techniques that might allow the operation to continue in its current location. (Director of Community Development) Staff recommendation: Council accept the report and permit staff to return with a recommended alternative site in February, allowing time for appropriate departmental and citizen reviews. 9. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-438, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE EXPANSION OF THE SAN YSIDRO/OTAY MESA ENTERPRISE ZONE AND TARGETED EMPLOYMENT AREA TO INCLUDE CERTAIN AREAS IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA; APPROVING AGREEMENTS WITH THE CALIFORNIA TRADE AND COMMERCE AGENCY, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO AND THE PORT OF SAN DIEGO REGARDING ZONE EXPANSION AND IMPLEMENTATION; AND APPROPRIATING $29,500 FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO SUPPORT THE EXPANDED ENTERPRISE ZONE PROGRAM (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) The City of San Diego has requested that the California Trade and Commerce Agency expand the existing San Ysidro / Otay Mesa Enterprise Zone and Targeted Employment Area to include certain areas in Chula Vista, including property owned by the Unified Port District of San Diego, and other property and business owners such as BF Goodrich and Raytheon. The proposed expansion would involve a regional partnership between the City of Chula Vista, the City of San Diego and the Port of San Diego, with each providing funding andlor programmatic support for the expanded Enterprise Zone. (Director of Community Development) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 10. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-439, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE BIDDING PROCESS AS IMPRACTICAL, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH ESTRADA LAND PLANNING, INC., FOR PLANNING AND DESIGN CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PHASE I OF THE CHULA VISTA ENTRYWAY BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT, AND APPROPRIATING $58,000 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND TO IMPLEMENT THE PROJECT (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) P~H1P (, ~ ('01ln('.,1 Mlnlltp~ 1 ?IO"I ?OOO CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) The "En and "H" Street segments between 1-5 and Broadway, and the Palomar segment between 1-5 and Industrial Blvd. have long been considered primary entryways into the City that are in need of revitalization. The purpose of this project is to create a thematic approach to these entryways and corridors, emphasizing the City's unique character and providing an enticing door to the City's downtown and waterfront areas. In September 2000, a Request for Response (RFR) was issued to prospective planning and design consultants to draft the scope of work. Estrada Land Planning, Inc. was selected as the consultant due to their response to the scope of work, extensive planning and design experience, and satisfactory work on other projects of similar nature in other jurisdictions. (Director of Community Development) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. II A RESOLUTION NO. 2000-440, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING FINAL MAPS OF CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 96-04A, OTA Y RANCH, VILLAGE ONE, PHASE SEVEN, NEIGHBORHOODS R-17 & R-16, ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE GENERAL UTILITY AND ACCESS EASEMENTS, AND THE WALL EASEMENTS GRANTED ON SAID MAPS WITHIN SAID SUBDIVISIONS, ACKNOWLEDGING ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC THE IRREVOCABLE OFFERS OF DEDICATION OF FEE INTEREST FOR OPEN SPACE LOTS J, K, AND L, APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS FOR THE COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY SAID SUBDIVISIONS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENTS B. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-441, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE "B" MAP SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR OTAY RANCH VILLAGE ONE, PHASE 7, NEIGHBORHOODS R-16 AND R-17, CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 96-04A, REQUIRING DEVELOPER TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNFULFILLED CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 19448, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT On May 4, 1999, by Resolution No. 19448, Council approved a Tentative Subdivision Map for Chula Vista Tract 96-04A, Otay Ranch, SPA One, Village One, Phase Seven. On May 9,2000 by Resolution 2000-208, Council approved Village One "A" Map No.2. On October 24, 2000 by Resolution 2000-371, Council approved the first "B" Map within Village One, Phase Seven. Adoption of the resolutions will approve two additional "B" maps within Phase Seven. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolutions. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-442, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF TWELVE (12) APPLICATIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) FOR THE FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 HAZARD ELIMINATION SAFETY PROGRAM P~UP 7 _ rOllnr,ll Minlltp.... 17/0~/ ?OOO CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) The Federal Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 created the Hazard Elimination Safety (HES) program by combining several existing safety programs. The HES Program provides funds for safety improvements to all public roads and highways, except for the interstate system. These funds serve to eliminate or reduce the number and severity of traffic accidents at hazardous public roads and highway locations, sections, and elements. CaITrans regulations require that official applications be submitted in order for projects to be considered for funding. In order for an application to be official, Council must approve a resolution authorizing submittal of the Federal Fiscal Year 2002/2003 HES program. Projects are chosen and then approved for funding after the applications have been evaluated by CaITrans. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. I3. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-443, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRlA TING $88,000.00 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE GAS TAX FUND AND $337,031.50 IN UNANTICIPATED REVENUE FROM THE SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (SDG&E) INCENTIVE PROGRAM TO A NEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - TRAFFIC SIGNAL LAMP REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (TF-291); APPROVING A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF INCANDESCENT LAMPS TO LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (L.E.D.) LAMPS; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASING AGENT TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH SYNCHRONEX FOR THE PURCHASE OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL L.ED. LAMPS (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) The City is in a position to save approximately $74,000.00 per year in energy costs by switching the green traffic signal indication lamps from incandescent lamps to light emitting diode (L.ED.) lamps. San Diego Gas & Electric Company has an incentive program that offers up to $175.00 rebate per light. The proposed project must be completed by June 30, 200 I in order to receive the incentive. This project is part of the City's overall carbon dioxide reduction and energy conservation plan. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 14. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-444, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA A WARDING A PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO KEN GRODY FORD IN THE AMOUNT OF $129,282.16 FOR EIGHT INTERMEDIATE SEDANS THROUGH A COOPERATIVE PURCHASE WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO p~(1P R _ Connr.il Minlltf>~ 17/O'i1 ?OOO CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) The City of Chula Vista is participating in a current City of San Diego bid from Ken Grody Ford to purchase eight intermediate sedans. Municipal Code Section 2.56.140 and Resolution No. 6132 authorize the Purchasing Agent to participate in cooperative bids with other government agencies for the purchase of materials of common usage. The City of San Diego publicly advertised the bid as required by state law. In addition, one local dealer, Fuller Ford, was sent a bid package. At City staff's request, People's Chevrolet will now be added to the mailing list for future bids. None of the dealerships from Chula Vista were awarded the bid. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 15. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-445, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNICL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND LAW CRANDALL, A DIVISION OF LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., FOR MATERIALS TESTING AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES AND INCREASING THE MAXIMUM COMPENSATION FOR THE AGREEMENT TO $750,000 On December 15, 1998, Council adopted Resolution No. 19296, approving a two-year agreement with Law Crandall to provide materials testing and geotechnical engineering consulting services from January I, 1999 to December 31, 2000. On March 21, 2000, Council adopted Resolution No. 2000-090, approving an increase in the maximum compensation for said services from $200,000 to $400,000 through December 31, 2000. Said agreement includes a provision giving the City the option to extend the original two- year agreement for one additional year from January 1,2001 to December 31, 2001 upon mutual agreement between the City and the Consultant. Staff recommends that the City exercise said option based upon Law Crandall's satisfactory performance. (Director of Public Works) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 16. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-446, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS, WAIVING INCONSEQUENTIAL BID DEVIATION, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE "PARKWAY POOL RE- SURFACING/RE-LAMPING IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CA. (PR-223)" PROJECT TO MISSION POOLS OF ESCONDIDO IN THE AMOUNT OF $407,599, AWARDING ALTERNATE (SECTION 01030) TO MISSION POOLS OF ESCONDIDO IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,775, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT On November 28, 2000, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the Parkway Pool resurfacinglre-Iamping project, which provides for renovation work within and adjacent to the existing swimming pool located at the Parkway Gymnasium site. Parkway Gymnasium is located at the northeast quadrant of the Fourth Avenue and Park p~o-p. Q _ rOllnr:l1 Mlnlltp... PIO,! 7000 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) Way intersection. The renovation work to be done generally consists of demolition, installation of new construction, concrete work required for decks and walkways, finish work (plaster and tile) as required for the interior of the pool, installation of luminaries, some circulation piping and a surge pit. The work also includes all labor, material, equipment, transportation, protection and restoration of existing improvements, and all appurtenances and other work necessary for completion of the project. Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. With regard to Item #12, Mayor Horton asked if improvements to the south side of Third Avenue, where the road narrows, would qualifY for the program. Public Works Director Lippitt responded that the proposed projects had to meet certain criteria, and the project in question may require right-of-way acquisition and possibly relocating a building. Mayor Horton asked staff to include the south side of Third A venue, Anita Street to Main Street, in the list for the Hazard Elimination Safety program. ACTION: Mayor Horton offered the Consent Calendar, headings read, texts waived. The motion carried 5-0. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Dan Beintema, Director, Chula Vista Nature Center, announced the South Bay Holiday Food and Toy Drive on Saturday, December 9, 2000, and invited the community to participate. PUBLIC HEARINGS 17. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING UTILITY UNDERGROUND DISTRICT NO. 132 ALONG BONITA ROAD FROM THE EASTERN CITY LIMITS TO OTAY LAKES ROAD AND ON OTAY LAKES ROAD FROM BONITA ROAD TO CAMINO DEL CERRO GRANDE/SURREY DRIVE On October 24,2000, by Resolution No. 2000-378, Council ordered a Public Hearing to be held on December 5, 2000 to determine whether the public health, safety or general welfare requires the formation of a utility underground district along Bonita Road from the eastern City limits to Otay Lakes Road and on Otay Lakes Road from Bonita Road to Camino del Cerro Grande/Surrey Drive. The purpose of forming the district is to require the utility companies to underground all overhead lines and to remove all existing wooden utility poles within the proposed district. The proposed utility undergrounding district is about 4,350 feet long along Otay Lakes Road and 800 feet along Bonita Road and will be mostly high voltage (65KV) transmission line conversion. This project will cost approximately $2,730,000 for both streets ($2,250,000 for Otay Lakes Road and $480,000 for Bonita Road). SDG&E's allocation funds (Rule 20-A) will be used to cover the cost of the project, including reimbursements to affected property owner(s) for their respective underground conversion cost. (Director of Public Works) PSl(1f" 1 0 _ ('nl1n~il Minntt":'I. 1 ?IO<;/ ?OOO PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and at the time specified in the notice. Mayor Horton opened the public hearing. There being no members of the public wishing to speak, the hearing was closed. ACTION: Councilmember Rindone moved to adopt Resolution No. 2000-447, heading read, text waived: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-447, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 132 ALONG BONITA ROAD FROM THE EASTERN CITY LIMITS TO OT A Y LAKES ROAD AND ON OT A Y LAKES ROAD FROM BONITA ROAD TO CAMINO DEL CERRO GRANDE/SURREY DRIVE AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF UTILITY ALLOCATION FUNDS TO SUBSIDIZE PRIVATE SERVICE LATERAL CONVERSION The motion carried 5-0. ACTION ITEMS 18. CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF BIDS AND AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE GREG ROGERS PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (PR-169) On November 17, 2000, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the Greg Rogers Park improvements project (PR-169). This project provides for improvement work within the existing ball field portion of the Greg Rogers Park site. Greg Rogers Park is located on the east side of Oleander Avenue between East Naples Street and East Palomar Street. The improvement work to be done includes grading, excavation and compaction, demolition of existing improvements, associated park and ball field lighting, associated irrigation and landscaping, fencing, hardscape areas, site building work, retaining walls, construction of a concession stand/restroom building, and construction of an accessible parking area and accessible walkways from the parking lot to the ball fields in compliance with American's Disability Act. The work also includes all labor, material, equipment, transportation, protection and restoration of existing improvements, traffic control, and all appurtenances and other work necessary for completion of the project. (Director of Public Works) ACTION: Councilmember Rindone offered Resolution No. 2000-448, heading read, text waived: Pl'lOP 11 _ Connl".i1 Mjnlltf~s 17 /0<;1 7000 ACTION ITEMS (Continued) RESOLUTION NO. 2000-448, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS, REJECTING LOWEST BID DUE TO DEVIATIONS IN BID PROPOSAL, AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE GREG ROGERS PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (PR-169) TO FAMANIA CONSTRUCTION, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $410,212, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT The motion carried 5-0. 19. CONSIDERATION OF ELECTION CHALLENGE REQUEST BY CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE MIKE DIAl On November 29, 2000, Council candidate Mike Diaz filed a request to challenge the results of the November 7, 2000 election for City Council Seat #3. He is alleging that Council candidate Jerry Rindone was not eligible to run for the Council seat under City ofChula Vista Charter Section 300D. Council member Rindone recused himself from discussion on the item and left the dais. Mike Diaz provided documentation to substantiate his claim that Jerry Rindone was not eligible to run for office under provisions set forth in the City Charter. Donald Worley, from the law firm of Stephenson Worley Garratt Schwartz Garfield & Prairie and representing Jerry Rindone, provided Council with a letter dated December 5, 2000, stating that he did not believe any investigation or fact finding would be necessary since Jerry Rindone had not violated the Charter. ACTION: Mayor Horton moved to direct the City Attorney to prepare a legal analysis and recommendation for Council consideration at the December 12, 2000 meeting. Tbe motion carried 4-0-1, with Councilmember Rindone abstaining. OTHER BUSINESS 20. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS A. Scheduling of meetings. City Manager Rowlands noted that a workshop regarding stop signs has been scheduled for January 18,2001. 21. MAYOR'S REPORTS A. ACTION: Appointment of Deputy Mayor. Mayor Horton moved to appoint Patty Davis as Deputy Mayor. Councilmember Salas seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. P::to-P, 17 _ (':rmnc:il Minlltp'l. 17/0<;/7000 OTHER BUSINESS (Continued) B. Proposed City Council committee assignments. Mayor Horton noted that she had previously discussed the assignments with Councilmembers. No action was taken. 22. COUNCIL COMMENTS A. Councilmember Salas - Direction to staff to rezone Friendship Park from professional offices to park-related purposes only. ACTION: Councilmember Salas moved to direct staff to proceed with the process to rezone Friendship Park for park-related purposes only. Councilmember Padilla seconded the motion, and it carried 5-0. Councilmember Rindone stated that these are exciting times for the City and that he was glad to be back on the Council and was ready to proceed. CLOSED SESSION 23. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B) . Claim no. 00-14-027 ACTION: Instructions were given to Counsel. 24. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) . City ofChula Vista v. Barnhart Construction, et al (SDSC No. OIS3859) ACTION: No action was taken. 25. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(C) . One case (Project no. 970101) ACTION: Instructions were given to Counsel. 26. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 City Negotiator: City Manager Employee organizations: Chula Vista Police Officers Association ACTION: Instructions were given to Counsel. P~O-P: 1 i . ("ollnc:il Minlltt":'; 171n';i 7000 ADJOURNMENT: At 8:] 5 p.m., Mayor Horton adjourned the meeting to the Regular Meeting of December 12, 2000, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Respectfully submitted ~~~.gJ<o Susan Bigelow, CMC, AAE, City Clerk P$I;(Jf'o 14 ~ Ccmnr:il MinlltpIi: 17/0,/7000 CI'IY OF CHUI VISIA OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Date: December 13, 2000 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council M. Kaheny, City Attorney~ ~-~ From: John Re: Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session for the Meeting of 12/12/00 The City Council of the City of Chula Vista met in Closed Session on 12/12/00 to discuss: · CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8: Property: The Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course on Bonita Road and seven adjacent acres Negotiating City of Chula Vista (Chris Salomone/Sid Parties: Morris) and American Golf Under Purchase price/lease rate and other terms and Negotiation: conditions for possible disposition of City-owned property and/or lease buy-out or restructure The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista met in Closed Session on 12/12/00 to discuss: · CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO OOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8: Property: Assessor Parcel Nos. 568-270-03; 568-270-11 (approximately 2.85 acres located at the southeast corner of Fourth Avenue and F Street Negotiating City Council/RedevelopmentAgency(Sid Morris/Chris Parties: Salomone) and Chula Vista Center (Robert Caplan) Under Negotiation: Price and terms for acquisition Property: Assessor Parcel No. 568-270-30; 344 F Street (approximately .25 acres located at the southeast corner of Fourth Avenue and Garrett) 276 FOURTH AVENUE · CHULA VISTA · CALIFORNIA 91910 · (619) 691-5037 · FAX (619) 409-5823 The Honorable Mayor and City Council December 13, 2000 Page 2 Negotiating City Council/RedevelopmentAgency(Sid Morris/Chris Parties: Salomone) and Park Centre Richard Zogob) Under Negotiation: Price and terms for acquisition The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in the closed Session in which the City Attorney participated, that there were no reportable actions which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. JMK:lgk CITY OF CHULA VISTA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Meeting Date: 12/19/2000 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Amending the FY00/01 budget by appropriating $107,209.34 from the unappropriated balance of the Equipment Replacement Fund and awarding purchase agreement to Dion International Trucks, Inc. in the amount of $107,209.34 for a street patch truck through a cooperative purchase with the City of San/Diego. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Work~s~ Deputy City Manager ]~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager ,~, ~Iv (4/5ths Vote: Yes X No ) In FY 99/00, a patch truck was approved for its normal replacement cycle for the Street Maintenance Section of Public Works Department. However, this patch truck was not purchased in FY 99/00. The City of Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.140 and Council Resolution No. 6132 authorize the Purchasing Agent to participate in cooperative bids with other government agencies for the purchase of materials of common usage. The City, therefore, is participating in a current City of San Diego bid from Dion International Trucks, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council amend the FY00/01 budget by appropriating $107,209.34 from the unappropriated balance of the Equipment Replacement Fund and award a purchase agreement to Dion International Trucks, Inc. in the amount of $107,209.34 for a street patch truck through a cooperative purchase with the City of San Diego. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable DISCUSSION: The patch truck (for the Street Maintenance Section) approved for replacement in FY 99/00 in the amount of $80,000 was not purchased last fiscal year and these monies reverted back to the Equipment Replacement Fund. Purchase of the patch truck was delayed pending the finalization of plans for the new Corporation Yard. Now that the construction date has been established, it has been decided that larger trucks should be purchased for the Operations Division to better utilize personnel. As a result of the relocation of the corporation yard, travel distance will be increased for some units of the fleet. Therefore, larger trucks are being purchased to reduce return trips to and from the Corporation Yard. Consequently, an additional $27,209.34 (in addition to the $80,000 already approved in FY99/00) is being requested to purchase a larger patch truck ($107,209.34) for the Street Maintenance Section. FISCAL IMPACT: The net total cost including taxes is $t07,209.34. Total required funds will be provided by the Equipment Replacement Fund (39200-7406). RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FY 00/01 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $107,209.34 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND AND AWARDING A PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO DION INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $107,209.34 FOR A STREET PATCH TRUCK THROUGH A COOPERATIVE PURCHASE WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO WHEREAS, in FY 99/00, a patch truck was approved for its normal replacement cycle for the Street Maintenance section of the Public Works Department, but the patch truck was not purchased in FY 99/00; and WHEREAS, Chula vista Municipal Code section 2.56.140 and Council Resolution No. 6132 authorize the purchasing Agent to participate in cooperative bids with other governmental agencies for the purchase of materials of common usage; and WHEREAS, the City, therefore, is participating in a current city of San Diego bid from Dion International Trucks, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby amend the FY 00/01 budget by appropriating $107,209.34 from the unappropriated balance of the Equipment Replacement Fund and award a purchase agreement to Dion International Trucks, Inc. in the amount of $107,209.34 for a street patch truck through a cooperative purchase with the city of San Diego for a net total cost, including taxes, of $107,209.34. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works /1:.,:2 ;!~ City Attorney [H:\HOME\ATTORNEY\RESO\ Street Patch Truck (December 14, 2000 (10: Sam)] :3-;2. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item ~ Meeting Date 12/19/2000 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Amending the FY00/01 budget by appropriating $71,872.91 from the un-appropriated balance of the Sewer Fund and awarding a Purchase Agreement to Dion International Trucks, Inc. in the mount of $419,472.91 for two Vactor combination sewer rusher trucks through a cooperative purchase with the City of San Diego. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Worksf Deputy City Manager~/ REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ .~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes X No ) ~Sd 9~ -" The City of Chula Vista is participating in a current City of San Diego bid from Dion International Trucks, Inc. for the purchase of two Vactor sewer combination trucks, The City of Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.140 and Council Resolution No. 6132 authorize the Purchasing Agent to participate in cooperative bids with other government agencies for the purchase of materials of common usage. There are no vendors in the City of Chula Vista that normally furnishes this type of heavy equipment. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council amend the FY00/01 budget by appropriating $71,872.91 from the an-appropriated balance of the Sewer Fund and awarding a Purchase Agreement in the amount of $419,472.91 for two Vactor combination sewer rusher trucks through a cooperative purchase with the City of San Diego. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable DISCUSSION: The FY2000/01 Equipment Replacement budget provides for the replacement of one combination sewer rusher truck in its normal retirement cycle. However, an additional $58,136.46 (in addition to the $151,600 already approved in the FY00/01 Equipment Replacement Budget) is being requested to cover the actual purchasing price for a new sewer rusher truck for the Wastewater Section (Operations) of the Public Works Department. Therefore, it is requested that the additional $58,136.46 be appropriated from the Sewer Fund. Page 2, Item ~ Meeting Date: 12/19/00 For FY2000/01, an additional combination sewer rusher track was approved for the Wastewater Section (Operations). The new sewer rusher track will help 1) minimize the number of stoppages and overflows that result in overtime, damage claims, and possible fines against the City; 2) control odor in the system; and 3) minimize the number of lift station failures. However, only $196,000 was approved for the purchase of a new sewer rusher truck for the Waste~vater Section (Operations). Therefore, it is requested that an additional $13,736.45 be appropriated from the Sewer Fund to cover the actual purchasing price of the new sewer rusher truck. FISCAL IMPACT: The net total cost including taxes is $419,472.91. The total required funds will be provided by the Equipmem Replacement Fund (39200-7406, $151,600) and the Sewer Fund (29200-7406, $196,000). The additional appropriation required for the purchase of two Vactor combination sewer rusher trucks will be provided by the Sewer Fund (29200-7406, $71,872.9 I). H:\SHARED\Public Works Operations\Al 13 Two Combo Cleaner FYO1 REV doc File No: 1320-DF RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FY 00/01 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $71,872.91 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE SEWER FUND AND AWARDING A PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO DION INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $419,472.91 FOR TWO VACTOR COMBINATION SEWER FLUSHER TRUCKS THROUGH A COOPERATIVE PURCHASE WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO WHEREAS, the city of Chula vista is participating in a current city of San Diego bid from Dion International Trucks, Inc. for the purchase of two Vactor sewer combination trucks; and WHEREAS, Chula vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.140 and Council Resolution No. 6132 authorize the purchasing Agent to participate in cooperative bids with other governmental agencies for the purchase of materials of common usage; and WHEREAS, there are no vendors in the city of Chu1a vista that normally furnishes this type of heavy equipment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby amend the FY 00/01 budget by appropriating $71,872.91 from the unappropriated balance of the Sewer Fund and award a purchase agreement to Dion International Trucks, Inc. for two Vactor combination sewer flusher trucks through a cooperative purchase with the City of San Diego for a net total cost, including taxes, of $419,472.91. Presented by Approved as to form by ~/C~ ~ John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works M. Kaheny Attorney [H\HOME\.,A,TTORNEY\RESO\ Sewer flusher trucks (December 13, 2000 (2:54pm)] Lj-3 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item ~ Meeting Date: 12/19/00 ITEM TITLE: Resolution 'Accepting bids and awarding contract for "Sidewalk Replacement at Various Locations in the City of Chula Vista, California (JY-065-G)" Project, and authorizing staff to increase value of contract to expend all available funds for this project SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public REVIEWED BY: City Manager On October 25, 2000, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the "Sidewalk Replacement at Various Locations in the City of Chula Vista, California (JY-065-G)" Project. The work consists of the removal and replacement of displaced curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveways. The work includes excavation and grading, PCC sidewalks, driveways, curbs & gutters, asphalt concrete pavement, removal and disposal of existing improvements, traffic control, protection and restoration of existing improvements, other miscellaneous work, and all labor, material, equipment, and transportation necessary for the project. RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept bids and award the contract for the "Sidewalk Replacement at Various Locations in the City of Chula Vista, California (JY-065-G)" Project to Jimenez, Inc. dba MJC Construction of Chula Vista, California, for $79,706.45, and authorize staff to increase value of contract to expend all available funds for this project. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The Public Works Operations Street Maintenance budget includes funds for this project. The project was included in the budget to remove and replace curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveways displaced on various City streets. This contract covers the FY2000-2001 maintenance budget. Engineering staff prepared plats, specifications, and advertised the project. Staff received and opened bids on October 25, 2000. The City received bids from four contractors as follows: Page2 Item ~ Meeting Date: 12/19/00 CONTRACTOR ][lid AMOUNT 1. Jimenez Inc., dba MJC Construction - Chula Vista, California. $79,706.45 2. Portillo Concrete, Inc. - Chula Vista, California $80,378.20 3. Star Paving, Inc. - San Diego, California $103,098.50 4. Scheidel Contracting - La Mesa, California $147,273.00 The low bid of Jimenez, Inc. is below the Engineer's estimate of $104,730.00 by $25,023.55 or approximately 24%. The Engineer's estimate was prepared conservatively using unit prices from previous similar projects. It is Staff's experience that these types of projects draw a good number of bid proposals, with the Iow bid usually being well below the Engineer's estimate. Engineering staff has verified the references provided by the contractor and their previous work has been satisfactory. Jimenez, Inc. has also done various CIP projects for the City and their work has also been satisfactory. Staff has reviewed the low bid and recommends awarding the contract to Jimenez, Inc. dba MJC Construction of Chula Vista, California, for $79,706.45. Attachment "A" shows the specific work to be done at each location, approximate quantities of sidewalk, curb, gutter, and driveway to be installed. Because of the low bid received, the Public Works Operations Street Maintenance group will be preparing a list with additional locations to be repaired to use all available funds. The contract specifications allow staff to increase or decrease the quantities based on available funds. Disclosure Statement Attachment "B" is a copy of the contractor's Disclosure Statement. Environmental Status The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project and has determined that the project is exempt under Section 15302, Class 2 (c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (Replacement of Existing Improvements). Wage Statement The source of funding for this project is Gas Tax Funds. Contractors bidding this project were not required to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them for the work under this project. No special minority or women owned business requirements were necessary as part of the bid documents. Disadvantaged businesses were encouraged to bid through the sending of the Notice to Contractors to various trade publications. Page3 Item -~ Meeting Date: 12/19/00 Financial Statement FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Contract Amount (Jimenez, Inc.). $79,706.45 B. Contingencies and additional locations $20,293.55 C. *StaffCosts (Design and Inspection) $12,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $112,000.00 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Gas Tax (16731-6401) $100,000.00 B. *Gas Tax Funds $12,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $112,000.00 Staff costs are included as part of the Gas Tax reimbursement to the General Fund, which includes personnel services in the operating budget and are not charged directly to this project. Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require only routine City street maintenance. Attachments: A - Location of work (Table) B - Contractor's Disclosure Statement H:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA\JY06$G All3.doc ATTACHMENT "A" Location and description of work - JY-065G No Street ~ Street 4;i' S/W Mono $/W, 6'Y D/WC/GPrlrotyl Number Name SF C/6 SF LF LF 2 885 Buena Vista Way ; §§ 5251 1 Buena Vista Way Buena Vista Way 50 12 1': 9 767 ~ue~'~ ~is~a Way 4? 1 lO 993 Buena Vista Way 11 1044Buena Wsta Way 100 12 1046 Buena Vista Way i2 16 1372 Cerritos Court 870 Dover Court 25 55 1 20 25 East I Street 105 1 220 1 22 70 East Prospect Street on He x 1 68,F fth Avenue 24 ' 130 F~rst Avenue 155 1 25 919 Guatay Avenue 261 20 1 30 0 1 Street (block), church 750 31 389 Inkopah Street 124 16 1 32 5701Mcintosh Street 150 1 34 1173Me rose Avenue ~JZ;~i I ATTACHMENT "A" Location and description of work - JY-065G Number Name SY 37 3 l~{~la~r Street 8ff ~ 1 38 383 Montclmr Street 120 30 1 39 455 Montclair Street, (& ~61) 4~ ~2~ ~{~e'y ~'~ 244~ 41 631 Oaklawn Avenue 128 30 1 42 362 Palomar Drive 184 . 1 43 643 Penelope 224 44 88 Second Avenue 300 60 1 ~ ~2~ Second Avenue 21~ 46 808 Stanford Avenue 10 lourmalmo Cou~ i 53 48 ~28~ Waxwmo kane 50 1295 Waxwing Lane 270 1 52 1038 Woodlawn Avenue 225 1 53 604 Date 280~: ~- 55 81 East Palomar Street on Hehx 120 59 683 Fifth Avenue 175: 60 689 Fifth Avenue 80 2 61 571 First Avenue 215 I ~ 62 108 G Street 63 1001 Guatay Avenue 198 2 36 2 67 744 Monserate Avenue 152 2 68 380 Nova Place 124, 2 2000 List. xls ATTACHMENT "A" Location and description of work - JY-065G No Street Street 4" 5/W Mono S/W, 6 D/Wi C/G Prlroty i 5F C/~ 5F ' LF :~ Number Nome ~ ~ 441 Corte Maria 115 3 74 3J5 Sandstone Court 75 3201Sandstone Court ~ 12 501 3 ATTACHMENT "B" THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters which will require discretionary action by the Council, Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista election must be filed. Thc following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. 2. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals with a $1000 investment in the business. (corporation/partnership) entity. 3. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. 4. Please identify every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to represent you before, the City in this matter? 5. Has any person* associated with this contract had any financial dealings with an official** of the City of Chula Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months. Yes No.X ATTACHMENT "B" If Yes, briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official** may have in this contract? 6. Have you made a contribution of more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council? No. Yes __ If yes, which Council member? 7. Have you or any member of your governing board (i.e. Corporate Board of Directors/Executives, non-profit Board of Directors made contributions totaling mol? ~ $1,000 over the past four (4) years to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council? Yes. No ~ If Yes, which Council member? 8, Have you provided more than $300 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official** of the City of Chula Vista in the past twelv~.(l~) months? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc.) Yes No_.~ If Yes, which official** and what was the nature of item provided? Signature o~Contractor/Applicant ~ Prim o~type name of Contnctor/Applicant * PersOn is defined ~: ~y Mdivid~. firm, co-p~ership, joMt venture, ass~iation, s~i~ club, fraternal org~ation, co.ration, estate, ~t, receiver, syn~cate, ~y o~er ~W, ciw, mmcip~i~, district, or o~er ~litic~ su~ivision, -or ~y o~er group or combhation actMg ~ a ~t. ** Offici~ ~ludes, but is not li~ted to: Mayor, Co.cji mem~r, Pl~g Co~issioner, Mem~r of a ~d, co~ssion, or coerce of ~e CiW, employee, or staff mem~rs. H:\HOME\ENGINEER\ADM IN\CONTRACT~$YO65G 25) 15 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR "SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CA. (JY- 065G)" PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO INCREASE VALUE OF CONTRACT TO EXPEND ALL AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR THIS PROJECT WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on October 25, 2000, the Director of Public Works received the following four sealed bids for "Sidewalk Replacement at Various Locations in the City of Chula vista, Ca. (JY-065-G)": CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT 1. Jimenez Inc. , dba MJC Construction - Chula $79,706.45 vista, California. 2. Portillo Concrete, Inc. - Chula vista, $80,378.20 California 3. Star Paving, Inc. - San Diego, California $103,098.50 4. Scheidel Contracting - La Mesa, California $147,273.00 WHEREAS, the low bid by Jimenez, Inc. is below the Engineer's estimate of $104,730.00 by $25,023.55 or approximately 24% and staff's bid estimate was prepared conservatively using prices from similar projects; and WHEREAS, Engineering staff checked the references provided by the contractor and all references were verified and their work has been satisfactory; and WHEREAS, staff has reviewed recommending awarding the contract to Construction of Chula vista, California; the low bid Jimenez Inc., and and is dba MJC WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project and has determined that the project is exempt under section 15301, Class 1 (c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (Minor Alterations of Existing Public Improvements or Public structures); and 1 S~(/ WHEREAS, the source of funding for this project is Gas Tax Funds and contractors bidding this project were not required to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them for the work under this project; and WHEREAS, no special minority or women owned business requirements were necessary as part of the bid documents, however, disadvantaged businesses were encouraged to bid through the sending of the Notice to Contractors to various trade publications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby accept bids and award contract for the "sidewalk Replacement at Various Locations in the city of Chula vista, California (JY-065G)" project to Jimenez, Inc. dba MJC Construction of Chula Vista, California in the amount of $79,706.45. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff is hereby authorized to increase value of contract to expend all available funds for this project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract on behalf of the city of Chula vista. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works " [H:\HOMEIATTORNEY\RESO\ sidewalk replacement (December 14, 2000 (10:26AM)] 2 .5-/0 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item (~ Meeting Date: 12/19/2000 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Accepting bids and awarding contract for the "Sidewalk Rehabilitation at Various Locations in the City of Chula Vista, California (STL-266)" project, and authorizing staff to increase value of contract to expend all available funds for this project SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works /~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager PtOy (4/Sths Vote: Yes No X ) On November 1, 2000, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the "Sidewalk Rehabilitation at Various Locations in the City of Chula Vista, California (STL-266)" project. The work consists on the removal and replacement of displaced curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveways. The work includes excavation and grading, PCC sidewalks, driveways, curbs & gutters, asphalt concrete pavement, removal and disposal of existing improvements, traffic control, protection and restoration of existing improvements, other miscellaneous work, and all labor, material, equipment, and transportation necessary for the project. RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept bids and award the contract for the "Sidewalk Rehabilitation at Various Locations in the City of Chula Vista, California (STL-266)" project, to Portillo Concrete, Incorporated of Chula Vista, California, for $175,627.50, and authorize staff to increase value of contract to expend all available funds for this project BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Included in the FY2000-01 CIP Budget is a project for the maintenance removal and replacement of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and driveway approaches. Some existing sidewalks, curbs, gutters and driveways show cracking. This project will remove and replace improvements on various locations in the City of Chula Vista. Engineering staff prepared plats, specifications, and advertised the project. Staff received and opened bids on November 1, 2000. The City received bids from five contractors as follows: Page 2, Item __ Meeting Date: 12/19/200~ CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT 1. Portillo Concrete, Inc. - Chula Vista, California. $175,627.50 2. Jimenez, Inc. - Chula Vista, California. $206,917.60 3. Scheidel Contracting La Mesa, California. $236,296.00 4. Heffier Company - National City, California $246,355.00 5. Weir Construction - Escondido, California $307,335.60 The low bid by Portillo Concrete, Inc. is below the Engineer's estimate of $264,979.00 by $89,351.50 or approximately 34%. The Engineer's estimate was prepared conservatively using unit prices from previous similar projects. It is Stafffs experience that these types of projects draw a good number of bid proposals, with the low bid usually being well below the Engineer's estimate. Engineering staff has verified the references provided by the contractor and their previous work has been satisfactory. Portillo Concrete, Inc. has also done CIP projects for the City and their work has also been satisfactory. Staff has reviewed the low bid and is recommending awarding the contract to Portillo Concrete, Inc. of Chula Vista, California. Attachment "A" shows the specific work to be done at each location, approximate quantities of sidewalk, curb, gutter, and driveway to be installed. Because of the low bid received, the Public Works Operations Street Maintenance group will be preparing a list with additional locations to be repaired to use all available funds. The contract specifications allow staff to increase or decrease the quantities based on available funds. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Goal The bid documents set forth participation requirements per Federal Regulation for meeting the disadvantaged and women-owned business goals. The Community Development Specialist has reviewed the bid documents submitted by the three lowest bidders. Her conclusion is that the lowest bidder, Portillo Concrete, Inc. does not need to be reviewed further for DBE. (See Attachment "B".) Staff also reviewed Portillo Concrete, Inc. eligibility status about federal procurement programs and the status of the State contractor's licenses. Portillo Concrete, Inc., is not listed as excluded from Federal Procurement Programs (list of parties excluded from Federal procurement or non- procurement programs as of November 6, 2000). The low bidder has satisfactorily met all the requirements. Staff, therefore, recommends awarding the contract to Portillo Concrete, Incorporated of Chula Vista. Disclosure Statement Attachment "C" is a copy of the contractor's Disclosure Statement. Page 3, Item __ Meeting Date: 12/19/2000 Environmental Status The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project and has determined that the project is exempt under Section 15302, Class 2 (c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (Replacement of Existing Public Improvements). Wage Statement The source of funding for this project is Community Development Block Grant Funds. This project is covered by the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts. The Davis-Bacon Act requires the payment of prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed for the work under this project. Prevailing wage rates are those determined by the U.S. Department of Labor or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Financial Statement FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Contract Amount $175,627.50 B. Contingencies and additional locations $57,517.50 C. Staff Costs (Design & Inspection) $18,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $251,145.00 A. FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION Community Development Block Grant $251,145.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $251,145.00 Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require only routine City street maintenance. Attachments: A - Work to be done. B - Memorandum from the Community Development Department. C - Contractor's Disclosure Statement H:\HOM E\ENG~N E E R'~AG ENDA\STL266 A113.doc CDBG (SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT) ATTACHMENT"A" LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOC. PLAT ST. STREET 4" S/~V RETURNS & C/G MONO S/W, CIG PCC D/W PCC CIG ~10 ~ NO. NO. NAME SF SF SF SF LF 1 ' I I 95 ~/OODLAWN AVENUE 450 60 2 1 81 WOODLAWN AVENUE 150 3 2 33 WOODLAWN AVENUE 60 4 2 54 WOODLAWN AVENUE 42 5 1 70 OAKLAWN AVENUE "-60 [_ 6 1 76 OAKLAWN AVENUE 25 50 7 I 78 OAKLAWN AVENUE 70 8 1 86 OAKLAWN AVENI~I-~ 24 --3-5 9 1 96 OAKLAWN AV / ON "D" ST 75 10 1 655 'D" ST / ON OAKLAWN AV 400 11 1 87 OAKLAWN AVENUE 75 30 12 1 85 3AKLAWN AVENUE 75 ~3 1 83 :)AKLAWN AVENUE --- 27 3HULA VISTA ST / ON 14 3 655 DAKLAWN AV 95 15 ~- 43 DAKLAWN AY 14 SEA VALE ST / ON OAKLAWN 16 3 660 AV 40 17 2 40 OAKLAWN AVENUE 25 18 2 44 OAKLAWNAVENUE 50 19 2 46 OAKLAWN AVENUE 125 20 2 54 O-AK LAWN AVENUE 15 21 3 639 CHULA VISTA ST. 175 37 639 CHULA VISTA ST. 25 44 RETURN OF MADISON AV & 22 4 i SWC CHULA VISTA ST 72 23 4 50 MADISON AVENUE 25 24 4 78 MADISON AVENUE 25 78 MADISON AVENUE 25 78 MADISON AVENUE 75 25 4 86 MADISON AVENUE 160 13 26 4 94 MADISON AVENUE 175 43 MADISON AV & "D" ST / 27 4 NWC CROSS GUTTER 48 28 4 83 MADISON AVENUE 55 29 4 77 MADISON AVENUE 265 CHULAVISTA S~ / ON '" -- 30 4 624 MADISON AM 20 RETURN OF MADISON AV & 31 3 NEC CHULA VISTA ST 90 32 3 41 MADISON AVENUE 175 33 33 3 37 MADISON AVENUE 30 34 3 640 SEA VALE 60 1 CDBG (SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT) ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOC. PLAT ST. STREET 4" S/¥V RETURNS & CIG MONO S/VV, CIG PCC DNV PCC CIG NO. NO. NO. NAME SF SF SF SF LF 35 3 640 SEA VALE / ON MADISON 55 36 3 40 MADISON AVENUE 200 38 37 3 44 MADISON AVENUE 110 VACANT LOT, S. SrDE O~ 44 38 3 MADISON AV 55 VACANT LOT, S. SIDE OF 44 39 3 MADISON AV 65 24 40 3 65~ SEA VALE ST 150 41 3 657 SEA VALE ST 150 12 42 2 695 SEA VALE ST 12 30 43 -'-2 695 ~ VALE ST 42 44 2 698 SEAVALE ST 260 53 45 2 688 SEAVALE ST 75 46 2 678 ~'A VALE ST .... ~5 47 2 30 OAKLAWN / ON SEA VALE ST 100 59 48 3 640 SEAVALE ST 105 49 3 618 SEA VALE ST 55 618 SEA-VALE ST 90 50 1 650 3HULA VISTA-~ 60 - ! VIADISON AV / ON CHULA 51 4 50 ¢ISTAST 255 =MADISON AV / ~N CHULA 50 VISTA ST 175 ~2 4 618 CHULA VISTA ST 25 BROADWAY / ON CHULA 53 4 60 VISTAST 150 BROADWAY / ON CHULA 60 VISTA ST 160 BROADWAY / ON CHULA 60 VISTAST 165 43 54 3 617 CHULA VISTA ST 50 55 3 ~23 CHULA VISTA ST 25 56 3 649 CHULA VISTA ST 255 57 3 651 CHULA VISTA ST 130 26 58 3 655 CHU~A VISTA ST 100 59 2 679 CHUL~VISTA ST 18 60 2 685 CHULA VISTA ST 75 .... 38 61 1 694 CHULA VISTA ST 90 62 1 690 CHULA VISTA ST 225 '~3 1 660 CHULAVISTAST--- 25 64 I 655 "D'* STREET 225 65 1 669 "D" STREET 30 66 1 675 "D" STREET 20 2 CDBG (SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT) ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK L~'OC. PLAT ST. STREET 4" S/W RETURNS & CIG MONO S/~V, CIG PCC 'D/VV PCC CIG -"NO. NO. NO. NAME SF SF SF S,F LF 67 1 675 "D" STREET 30~ r__ ~68 1 677 "D" STREET 90 69 1 95 WOODLAWN AV / ON "D" ST 130 70 1 101 NOODLAWN AV / ON '*D" ST 80 71 1 101 / NOODLAWN AV / ON "D" ST 125 ~2 1 i 668~/,,D,, STREET 80 73 1 ! 658 360,662"D" STREET 660 74 4 102B VIADISON AV / ON "D" ST 70 '75 4 102 VlADISON AV / ON "D" ST 180 76 5 146 OAKLAWN / ON FLOWER ST 50 ~VOODLAWN AV / ON 77 5 147 FLOWER ST 200 65 -78 6 - 447 "F" ST / FIRE STATION #1 325 25 79 7 176 E~ETHUNE WAY 20 ~0 7 189 E~ETHUNE WAY -- 8 81 7 161 BETHUNE WAY 95 8 82 7 155 BETHUNE WAY 4 ALBANY AV / ON BETHUNE 83 7 1480 WAY 84 84 7 171 CARVERSTREET 5 ~5 7 170 CARVERSTREET 45 86 7 172 CARVER STREET 30 1~7 8 168 ANITA STREET 35 6 ~8 8 186 ANITA STREET 40 88~ 8 187 ANITA STREET 185 8 171 ANITA STREET 70 91 8 1518 ALBANY AV / ON ANITA ST 30 92 8 160 TREMONT STREET 35 93 8 164 TREMONT STREET 20 94 8 174 TREMONTSTREET 28 95 8 195 TREMONT STREET 60 96 9 208 TREMONT STREET 240 97 9 210 TREMONT STREET 280 98 9 240 TREMONT STREET 35 99 10 ! 257 TREMONTSTREET 70 100 10 268 TREMONTSTREET 150 101 12 345 ANITA ST / ON TREMONT ST 90 102, 12 t1580 THIRDAV/ONANITAST i 25 ~ -- 103 12 1580 THIRD AV / ON ANITA ST 85 104 12 r 1500 THIRDAVIONANITAST 25 105 12 1500 THIRDAV/ONANITAST J 1190 3 CDBG (SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT) ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOC. PLAT ST. STREET 4" S/W RETURNS & CIG MONO SNV, CIG PCC D/VV PCC CIG NO. NO. NO. NAME SF SF SF SF LF 107 11 368 ANITASTREET 240 108 11 368 ANITASTREET 80 109 11 368 ANITASTREET 404 110 11 368 ANITASTREET 52 111I 11 368 ANITASTREET 84 9 112 11 368 ANITA STREET 20 113 11 368 ANITA STREET 100 11-4 11 368 ANITA S~REET 320 ---- 22 115 11 368 ANITA STREET 372 116 12 345 ANITA STREET 50 117 12 345 ANITASTREET 50 li~ 12 325 ANIT-ASTREET 35 119 12 321 ANITA STREET ___~3_~__ _ 13__ 153 MONTGOMERYST 40 _13~ 157 MONTGOMERY ST 75 123 14 501 ANITA STREET 45 124 14 501 ANITA STREET 280 125 14 501 ANITA STREET 150 49 ANNA LINDA DR / ON ANITA 126 14 469 ST 300 47 ANNA LINDA DR / ON ANITA 127 15 456 ST 150 ANNA LINDA DR / ON ANITA 128 15 456 ST 205 28 ANNA LINDA DR / ON ANITA 129 15 _~5~6 ST _~_6 130 15 444 ANITA STREET 140 28 i-31 15 44~-- ANITA STREET 1240 1 ~2 15 444 ~ITA STREET 40 133 15 444 ANITA STREET 230 134 15 444 ANITASTREET 3180 15 135 14 502 ANITASTREET 170 136 14 502 ANITA STREET 460 137 14 502 ANITASTREET 225 138 14 502 ANITA STREET 80 139 14 502 ANITA STREET 25 140 14 502 ANITA STREET 40 141 16 521 ORANGE AV / ON ANITA ST 25 1'~2 16 521 OR,~NGE AV / ON ANITA ST 75 143 16 521 ORANGE AV / ON ANITA ST 90 144 16 521 ORANGEAV/ONANITAST 85 145 16 532 ANITA STREET 45 4 CDBG (SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT) ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOC. PLAT ST. STREET 4" S~N RETURNS & CIG MONO S/W, CIG PCC D/W PCC CIG NO. NO. NO. NAME SF SF SF SF LF 146 16 532 ANITA STREET 72 105 147 14 501 ANITA STREET 126 148 14 501 ANITA STREET 70 149 14 501 &NITA STREET 140 150 14 501 &NITASTREET 630 15 151 14 501 ~NITA STREET 25 152 9 228 VlONTGOMERYSTREET 25 153 9 226 VlONTGOMERY STREET 80 16 154 9 230 VlONTGOMERY STREET 30 15 VIONTGOMERY & DEL 155 9 SEC MONTE 32 156 9'- 203 MONTGOMERYSTREET 157 9 203 MONTGOMER-~ STREET 50 158 9 204 MONTGOMERYS~R~ET 3(~ 159 9 212 MONTGOMERY STR~T 130 10 12 160 9 222 MONTGOMERY STREET 50 161 9 222 MONTGOMERYSTREET 30 162 9 222 MONTGOMERY STREET 30 i-63 10 280 MONTGOMERY S~TREET 55 164 10 282 MONTGOMERY STREET 80 I ENTRAN(~ TO LOS PANCHO'S TACO SHOP / ON 165 10 MONTGOMERY 30 49 166 17 279 MONTGOMERY STREET 5 167 17 ~ 255 MONTGOMERYSTREET 15 168 17 255 MONTGO-MERY STREET 25 169 10 260 MONTGOMERY ~TREET 16 170 10 260 MONTGOMERY STREET 16 171 12 326 MONTGOMERY STREE~ 80 14 ' FRESN~-~,V / ON 172 12 1617 MONTGOMERY ST 21 ACROSS FROM 375 173 11 MONTGOMERY ST 45 ACROSS FROM 393 174 11 ~ MONTGOMERY ST 60 - -T i MONTGOMERY ST & 175 11 I NEC FOURTHAV 65 ~ ACROSS FROM 363 __ 176 11 MONTGOMERYST 130 5 ACROSS FROM 365 177 11 MONTGOMERY ST 6 i~8' 15 430 MONTGOMERY STREET 65 179 15 430 MONTGOMERYSTREET 100 180 18 449 MONTGOMERY STRI~ET ~25 5 CDBG (SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT) ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOC. PLAT ST. STREET 4" S/W RETURNS & CIG MONO S/VV, CIG PCC D/W PCC CIG NO. NO. NO. NAME SF SF SF SF LF JUST EAST OF 318 TREMON1 181 12 ST 105 21 182 13 186 ZENITH STREET 130 90 44 183 13 187 ZENITH STREET 25 OTAY PARK / E. SIDE OF 184 13 ALBANY AV 24 185 19 226 ZENITHSTREET 45 186 19 239 ZENITH STREET 24 187 19 231 ZENITH STREET 84 ..... 20 .... 188 19 205 ZENITH STREET 20 ~I'189 _1_~ 270 ZENITH 36 i190 17 BAPTIST CHURCH/ZENITH 36 i__19__1_17 1(~-5- i-RD ON ZENITH SIDE 92 192 20 326 ZENITH 20 193 21 382 ZENITH 256 194 21 394 ZENITH 50 195 21 394 ZENITH 20 196 18 414 ZENITH 20 197 18 426 ZENITH 44 198 18 448 ZENITH 112 199 18 I 449 ZEN~T~ 88 -- 200 i 18 443 ZENITH 20 201 18 411 ZENITH 202~ 18 409 ZENITH 16 203 13 1671 ALBANY 60 20 204 13 1671 ALBANY 25 377 205 8 1600 ALBANY BY PARK 20 206 8 1600 ALBANY BY PARK 25 207 8 1525 ALBANY 25 206 i 7 1503 ALBANY 25 209 7 1503 ALBANY 84 210 7 1492 ALBANY 117 211 8 1492BK ALBANY W/SIDE 108 212 13 1666 ALBANY 124 213 9 1600 BANNER W/SIDE 24 17 214 9 203 BANNER W/SIDE 124 215 ! 9 203 BANNERW/SIDE 20 216 i ~' 203 BANNERW/SIDE 24 217 9 1600 BANNER W/SIDE 50 218 9 1600 BANNER W/SIDE 25 219 13 1663 BANNER E/SIDE 140 220 8 1600 BANNER E/SIDE 104 21 12 6 CDBG (SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT) ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOC. PLAT ST. STREET 4" S~V RETURNS & C/G MONO S/W, CIG PCC D/W PCC CIG ~JO. NO. NO. NAME -- SF SF SF SF LF 221 7 1481 BANNER ~ SIDE 7 22~2 10 SWC DEL MONTE & TREMONT ST 4~ ~23 9 1606 DEL MONTE AV 16 224 17 1665 DELMONTEAV '~4 AT ALLEY NEXT TO 1665 DEL 225 17 MONTEAV 22 226' 19 3288 MAINST/ONDELMONTEAV 44 ~27 1[~ 3308- MAIN ST / DEL MONTE AV 55 _ __ ZENITH / ON DEL MONTE AT 228 19 246 ALLEY 20 229 11 SWC FRESNO AV & ANITA ST 102 -- -- -- ~CROSS FROM 16t7 230 11 FRESNOAV 15 -- FRESNO AV & 231 11 NWC MONTGOMERY ST 3 FRESNO AV JUST N. OF 232 21 NWC MAIN ST 6 ~33 -2~ '399 ZENITH/ON E. SIUE4THAV 234z~21 399 ZENITH/ONE. SIDE4THAV-- 25 i 235 '~-394 ZENITH/ONE. SIDE4THAV - 230 236 21 ~_ 394 ZENITH/ONE. SIDE4THAV 75 MONTGOMERY ELEM. 4TH MONTGOMERY ELEM. 4TH 238 11 1601 AVE 55 S/E CORNER 4TH ~ ANITA I_TM 11~ _1600 0NHEEL CHAIR RAMP) 90 1240 15 1600 NWC OF 4TH & TREMONT _2~0 ~2_41 15 1616 4TH AVENUE 7~5 I~42 22 147 MADISON AVENUE 6~5 22 143 MADISON AVENUE 50 22_ 1~ MADISON AVENUE 5(~ .... __ ~245 22 ~1.33 MADISON AVENUE 15~0 160 _ ~46 22 121 MADISON AVENUE 355 34 J247 22 115 VlADISON AVENUE 72 ~48 22 105 MADISON AVENUE 25 72 1249 22 V1ADISON AVENUE 120 I 250 22 VlADISONAVENUE 20 [ 1 2-51 22 116 VlADISONAVENUE 65 72 1~52. 22 128 MADISON AVENUE 250 I 253 22 138 VIADISONAVENUE 11~ --- ' I]2~4 _22~ _146 VlADISONAVENUE 30 ~25_5 5 146 OAKLAWN AVENUE 16~0 7 CDBG (SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT) ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOC. PLAT ST. STREET 4" S/VV RETURNS & CIG MONO S/W, CIG PCC D/W PCC CIG NO. NO. NO. NAME SF SF SF SF LF 257 5 124 ~)AKLAWN AVENUE 120 30 258 5 118 DAKLAWN AVENUE 60 259 5 114 DAKLAWN AVENUE ..... 60 260 1 682 !"D" STREET 28 261 1 668 "D" STREET 20 262 5 117 OAKLAWN AVENUE 40 263 5 143 WOODLAWN AVENUE 80 264 5 139 NOODLAWNAVENUE 64 265 5 131 WOODLAWN AVENUE 176 15 266 5 125 WOODLAWN AVENUE 116 267 5 121 WOODLAWN AVENUE 20 26~- 5 117 WOODLAWNAVENUE 269 5 115 WOODLAWN AVENUE 16 270 5 115 WOODLAWN AVENUE 16 271 5 115 WOODLAWN AVENUE 12 bRAND TOTAL 28256 252 1480 140t 120~ 8 ATTACHMENT "B" Memo To: Roberto Sol~)rzano, Assistant Engineer II From: Judith Atwood, Senior Community Development Specialist_;' Date: 11/21/00 Re: DBE Review of STL 266 I have reviewed the lowest bid estimate from Podillo Concrete and noticed that Portillo Concrete is not utilizing subcontractors and therefore does not need to be reviewed further for DBE. The intent of the DBE program is to have pdme contractors use local DBE subcontractors. If you should have any questions regarding this memorandum, please call me at extension 5036. Page 1 ATTACHMENT "C" THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT You are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign conlributions, on ali matters which will require discretiona~ action on the pan of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. Thc following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interes~ in the property which is the subject of the application or the Cona'act, owner, applicant, ConU'actor, subcontractor, material supplier. 2. If any person* identified pursuant to ( 1 ) above is a corporation or parmership, list the names of all individuals owning more that 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any pmrtnership interest in the parmership. NII 3. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a hmst, list the names of any person serving as directol of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve month? Yes __No ~_ If yes, please indicate person(s):. 5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent Contractors who you hav, assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. N IK£ ?ORTILLD ?OKBLLO POC,T\LLO T bJ h gDg,- LLC) 6. Have you and/or your officers or agents,!tin the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Council member in the current o preceding election period.9 Yes _ No ~:s, If yes, state which Council members(s): Date: ~[- ~-00 * * * (NOTE: Attached ad~~s n~ Signature o f Contractor/Applicant Mt f lb PbRT ILLO Print or type name of Contractor/Applicant · ?¢r8on is defined as: "Any individual, firm, co-parmership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporatio~ estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other count),, city or country, city municipality, district, or other political subdivision, c any other group or combination acting as a unit. 45 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR "SIDEWALK REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CA. (STL-266)" PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO INCREASE VALUE OF CONTRACT TO EXPEND ALL AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR THIS PROJECT WHEREAS, on November 1, 2000 in, the Director of Public Works received the following five sealed bids for "Sidewalk Rehabilitation at Various Locations in the city of Chula vista, Ca. (STL-266)" : CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT 1. Portillo Concrete, Inc. - Chula Vista, $175,627.50 California. 2. Jimenez I Inc. - Chula Vista, $206,917.60 California. 3. Scheidel Contracting - La Mesa, $236,296.00 California. 4. Heffler Company - National city, $246,355.00 California 5. Weir Construction - Escondido, $307,335.60 California WHEREAS, the low bid by Portillo Concrete, Inc. is below the Engineer's estimate of $264,979.00 by $89,351.50 or approximately 24% and staff's bid estimate was prepared conservatively using prices from similar projects; and WHEREAS, Engineering staff checked the references provided by the contractor and all references were verified and their work has been satisfactory; and WHEREAS, staff has reviewed recommending awarding the contract to Vista, California; and the low bid Portillo Inc. and is of Chula 1 / o - /4 WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project and has determined that the project is exempt under Section 15302, Class 2 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Replacement of Existing Public Improvements); and WHEREAS, the source of funding for this proj ect is Community Development Block Grant Funds and contractors bidding this proj ect were required to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them for work under this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby accept bids and award contract for the "Sidewalk Rehabilitations at various Locations in the City of Chula Vista, California (STL-266)" project to Portillo Concrete, Incorporated of Chula Vista, California in the amount of $175,627.50. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff is hereby authorized to increase value of contract to expend all available funds for this project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract on behalf of the City of Chula vista. Presented by Approved as to form by ~A~~ ~n M. Kaheny City Attorney John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works [H:\HOME\ATTORNEYIRESO\ sidewalk rehabilitatioan (December 14, 2000 (11:1AM)] 2 --- -"'- ' COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Meeting Date: 12/19/00 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Accepting bids and awarding contract for the "Installation of Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements Along the Northside of Orange Avenue Between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue in the City of Chula Vista, California (STL-228)" Project. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Work~,y //)~ REVIEWED BY: C'ty ~vtanager ff,4 (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No X ) On November 15, 2000, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the "Installation of Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements Along the Northside of Orange Avenue Between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue in the City of Chula Vista, California (STL-228)" Project. The work to be done involves the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements, bus pads, pedestrian ramps, driveways, cross-gutters, and new mailboxes. The work also includes all labor, material, equipment, transportation, protection of existing improvements and traffic control necessary for the project. RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept bids and award the contract for the "Installation of Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements Along the Northside of Orange Avenue Between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue in the City of Chula Vista, California (STL-228)" to Pullman Engineering, Inc. of San Diego, California, in the amount of$151,117.46. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: This project provides for the construction of new curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements along the north side of Orange Avenue between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue. This is also a part of the Sidewalk Safety Program that provides for the construction of sidewalk facilities in the Montgomery Area. This project will improve pedestrian access and circulation in the vicinity of the South Chula Vista Library. The general scope of the project involves the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements which includes bus pads, pedestrian ramps, driveways, cross-gutters, sidewalk under drain pipes, and new mail boxes on the north side of Orange Avenue, between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue in the City of Chula Vista, California. The work also includes all labor, materials, equipment, transportation, protection of existing improvements and traffic control necessary for the project and other work necessary to perform the new' improvements complete and workable. Engineering Staff prepared plans and specifications and advertised the project. Staff received 7-/ Page 2, Item Meeting Date: 12/19/00 and opened bids for the project on November 15, 2000. The City received bids from eight contractors as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT I. Pullman Engineering, Inc., San Diego, Cali£omia $151,117.46 2. Jimencz Inc. DBA MJC Construction, Chula Vista, California $161,115.00 3. K.C. Equipment, Inc., E1 Cajon, Cali£omia $184,588.00 4. Portillo Concrete, Inc., Chula Vista, California $187,155.10 5. Star Paving, San Diego, California $194,713.00 6. Heftier Company, Inc., National City, California $204,972.63 7. CDM Construction, Inc., El Cajon, California $205,853.10 8. Scheidel Contracting & Engineering, Inc., La Mesa, California $219,170.00 The low bid by Pullman Engineering, Inc. is below the Engineer's estimate of $187,710.00 by $36,592.54 or approximately 19%. StafFs bid estimate was based on average prices for similar type of work completed during the last three years. Engineering staff has verified the references provided by the contractor and their work has been satisfactory. The Contractor's License No. 770533 is current and active. Pullman Engineering, Inc. has also done several CIP projects for the City and their work has been satisfactory. Staff has reviewed the low bid and recommends awarding the contract for $151,117.46 to Pullman Engineering, Inc. of San Diego, California. Disclosure Statement Attached is a copy of the contractor's Disclosure Statement. Environmental Status The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project and has determined that the project is exempt under Section 15301, Class 1 (c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (Minor Alterations of Existing Public Improvements or Public Structures). Wage Statement Contractors bidding this project were not required to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them for the work under this project. No special minority or women owned business requirements were necessary as part of the bid documents. Disadvantaged businesses were encouraged to bid through the sending of the Notice to Contractors to various trade publications. Page 3, Item Meeting Date: 12/19/00 Fiscal Impact FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Contract Amount (Pullman Engineering, Inc.) $151,117.46 B. Contingencies (approximately 15%) $22,668.00 C. Staff Costs (Design & Inspection) $30,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $203,785.46 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION A. CDBG $197,129.00 B. Gas Tax $6,656.46 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $203,785.46 Upon completion of the project, only routine maintenance will be required. Attachments: Contractor's Disclosure Statement Cm H:\HOME\ENGINEERING~AGENDAXSTL228-AI I3.doc THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters which will require discretionary action by the Council, Planning Commission and all other official bodies ofthoCity,~astatement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista election must be filed. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. 2. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals with a $1000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) entity. 3. If any person * identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. 4. Please identify every person, including any agents, employees; consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. 47 H :\ItOM E\ENGIN EER\ADM|N~CONTRACT~STL228R.DOC 5. Has any person* associated with this contract had any financial dealings with an official** of the City of Chula Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months? Yes No ~ If Yes, briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official** may have in this contract. 6. Have you made a contribution of more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council? Yes No v~ If Yes, which Council member? 7. Have you or any member of your governing board (i.e.'Corporate Board of Directors/Executives, non-profit Board of Directors made contributions totaling more than $1,000 over the past four (4) years to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council? Yes No [/~' If Yes, which Council member? 8. Have you provided more than $300 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official** of the City of Chula Vista in the past twelve (12) months? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc.) Yes __ No ~/' If Yes, which official** and what was the nature of item provided? Sign~cant Print or type name o~ Contractor/Apph~cant * Person is defined as: any individual, finn, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, district, or other political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit. ** Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, Council member, Planning Commissioner, Member of a board, commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staffmembers. 48 H :\H OM E\EN GIN EERXADM INSCONI'RACTXSTL228R.DOC Memo To: Ben Herrera, Assistant Engineer II, Design Section From-' Judith Atwood, Senior Community Development Specialist Date: 12/8/00 Re: DBE Review of STL 228 I have reviewed the lowest bid estimate from Pullman Engineering, Inc and have determined that, as the prime contractor, Pullman Engineering, Inc. has provided the required DBE documentation to the Housing Division for Frank and Sons Paving and Monica Construction. If you should have any questions regarding this memorandum, please call me at extension 5036. Page I RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE "INSTALLATION OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE NORTHSIDE OF ORANGE AVENUE BETWEEN FOURTH AVENUE AND FIFTH AVENUE IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA (STL-228)" PROJECT WHEREAS, on November 15, 2000, the Director of Public Works received the following eight sealed bids for the "Installation of Curb, Gutter and sidewalk Improvements along the Northside of Orange Avenue between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue in the city of Chula Vista, Ca. (STL-228)": CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT 1. Pullman Engineering, Ine. , San Diego, Ca. $151,117.46 2. Jimenez Ine" dba MJC Construction, Chula $161,115.00 vista, California 3. K.C. Equipment I Ine" El Cajon, California $184,588.00 4. Portillo Concrete, Ine" Chula Vista I $187,155.10 California 5. Star paving, San Diego, California $194,713.00 6. Heffler Company, Ine" National city, $204,972.63 California 7. CDM Construction, Ine" El Cajon, California $205,853.10 8. Scheidel Contracting & Engineering, Ine" La $219,170.00 Mesa WHEREAS, the low bid of $151,117.46 by Pullman Engineering is below the Engineer's estimate of $187,710.00 by $36,592.54 or approximately 19% and staff's bid estimate was based on average prices for similar type work completed during the last three years; and WHEREAS, Engineering staff checked the references provided by the contractor and all references were verified and their work has been satisfactory; and 1 -7. "7 WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the low bid recommending awarding the contract to Pullman Engineering, San Diego, California; and and is Inc. of WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator reviewed the work involved in this project and has determined the project is exempt under Section 15301, Class 1 (c) of California Environmental Quality Act (Minor Alterations Existing Public Improvements or Public Structures); and has that the of WHEREAS, contractors bidding this project were not required to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them for the work under this project and no special minority or women owned business requirements were necessary as part of the bid documents, however, disadvantaged businesses were encouraged to bid through the sending of the Notice to Contractors to various trade publications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept bids and award contract for the "Installation of Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements along the Northside of Orange Avenue between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue in the City of Chula Vista" to Pullman Engineering, Inc. of San Diego, California in the amount of $151,117.46. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works /qJ 1~4AI John M. 'K e (./ City Attorney [H:\HOME\ATTORNEY\RESO\ Orange Avenue Cub bid {November 21, 2000 (10:40AM)] 2 "'''1 j / -/1 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item ~ Meeting Date 12/19/00 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Awarding a three-year agreement for Assessment District delinquency monitoring to MuniFinancial, Inc. and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement / ./ SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works {~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager 0~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No X.~) The proposed agreement will retain the services of MuniFinancial, Inc. to perform delinquency monitoring services on existing City Assessment Districts and coordinate the collection of all delinquent installment payments on these Districts, as requested by the City, for the time period January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003. This action will ensure that the City's fiduciary responsibility to the bondholders is fulfilled by providing these required services. All costs associated with collection of delinquent assessments are recovered from the delinquent property owners at no expense to the City. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution, awarding a three-year agreement for Assessment District delinquency monitoring services to ManiFinancial, Inc., and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement. DISCUSSION: Background The City has formed eleven Assessment Districts to provide financing of infrastructure, mostly for new developments. The bonds that were used to finance the improvements were issued pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. These bonds are typically paid offby each District over a twenty to thirty year period. The yearly installment is collected on the tax bill of those who benefit from the improvements. In addition to the principal and interest, a maximum sixteen-dollar ($16.00) fee is collected yearly from every parcel within each District to cover administration costs. One of the provisions of issuing 1915 Act limited obligation bonds is that the City must monitor the collection process. The 1915 Bond act states that the cost of collecting a delinquent installment is recoverable from the delinquent parcel. The delinquent installment, penalties, interest and collection costs are collected from the delinquent parcels. The City has used the services of MuniFinancial, Inc. for the past three years and is satisfied with their services. Consultant Selection Process The City has previously used qualified outside personnel to accomplish this work, in lieu of performing the activities in-house. The purposes for hiring outside personnel to perform these services are speed, expertise and cost. MuniFinancial, Inc. has special expertise in this area and has handled a sizable portion of the delinquency monitoring services in Southern California. Having such a specialist mon/tor the collection of delinquent assessments will allow the City to meet its covenants in a t'umely manner and at a lower expense to the delinquent parcel. Page 2, Item ~ Meeting Date 12/19/00 Public Works/Engineering Division staff followed Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.230 in the consultant selection process. As required, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was prepared by staff in accordance with the above mentioned Municipal Code section and sent to ten firms. An advertisement inviting proposals was also published in The Star-News on Friday, October 20, 2000. The RFP included a description of the scope of work and the time frames for completion. Each firm was asked to indicate in its RFP: 1) proof of general familiarity with assessment districts, especially the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, 2) proof of capacity, resources and specialized equipment or expertise to perform the work, 3) names and qualifications of all key personnel to be used in the project, including any subconsultants, 4) past record of performance and references, 5) the location of the office where the work is to be performed, and 6) a cost estimate. The RFP also indicated that the City would rank the proposals based on the following criteria: 1. Fee proposal and pay schedule, 2. Past record of performance (Reference Evaluation), 3. Evaluation of personnel qualifications, including subconsultants if so indicated, 4. Capacity and resources to perform the work, and 5. Proximity of office to San Diego County. The following two firms responded to the RFP mailing and invitation and submitted proposals: MuniFinancial/A Willdan Company, located in Temecula, California NBS Government Finance Group, located in Temecula, California RFP Evaluation Process The selection committee was appointed by the City Manager in accordance with Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.230 and consisted of the following members: Elizabeth Chopp, Civil Engineer Thomas L. Magness, Engineering Technician II Veronica Roble, Accountant. The committee members were provided with individual copies of the proposals. Both firms were invited to participate in the interview process and both firms accepted. On November 15, 2000, the committee interviewed the firms. These firms were ranked in accordance with the following criteria: 1. Qualifications of personnel (20 points) 2. Resources available to perform tasks on time and within budget (20 points) 3. Firm experience directly related to contract (20 points) 4. Quality of presentation (15 points) 5. Response to interview questions (25 points) 6. Total cost and justification (30 points) Page 3, Item ~ Meeting Date 12/19/00 Each member of the interviewing panel awarded points to the two firms, with 130 points per member being the maximum and 390 points the total maximum awarded by the entire committee. The two firms were ranked as follows: MtmiFinancial was ranked first with 359 points, and NBS was ranked second with 336 points. The selection committee felt that MuniFinancial was the better choice for the new contract because they were stronger in the following criteria: project team and area knowledge, current experiencehandling the present contract and quality of work performed under the existing contract. The cost estimates for both firms were compared for both fixed and variable costs. The baseline fixed fees quoted by MuniFinancial are $2,500 per year. For NBS, the fixed fees would be $12,500 for the first year ($9000 for subsequent years) plus undisclosed annual maintenance fees for computer access. However, MuniFinancial's fees per parcel for performance of the task outlined in the contract were higher than NBS's per parcel fees. Based on past history, it appears that the total annual fees for both firms would be about the same. Therefore, cost was not a deciding factor. Contract Terms Generally, the provisions of the contract provide that MuniFinancial, Inc. will be responsible for coordinating the collection of all delinquent installment payments, as requested by the City, for the time period January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003. The City shall pay an annual base fee of $2,500.00 in January of each year of the contract. Funds for this service will be advanced from the $16.00 yearly administrative fee that the City collects from every parcel within the Assessment Districts. The compensation schedule for MuniFinancial, Inc. provides for payment for each item of work per parcel and, if a parcel is delinquent in more than one district, compensation shall be as if that parcel were delinquent in only one district. These fees are as follows: Delinquency 21-Day Reminder Letter $ 20 per parcel per district Delinquency 30-Day Demand Letter $ 30 per parcel per district Final Delinquency 21-Day Foreclosure Letter $ 42 per parcel per district Effect Removal from Tax Roll $102 per parcel per district Subsequent Foreclosure Service Fee $150 per parcel per district Prepare and Monitor Payment Plan $150 per parcel per district MuniFinancial, Inc. will be responsible for collection of the delinquent installment by sending a Delinquency 21-Day Reminder Letter and, if necessary, a Delinquency 30-Day Demand Letter explaining the gravity of the situation and the need for immediate payment. If MuniFinancial is not successful they will pass the case to our Foreclosure Consultant, which will be selected under a separate RFP, for judicial foreclosure services. If the property owner is willing to initiate a payment plan, MuniFinancial will set up such a plan to ensure payment. MuniFinancial, Inc. is currently developing a new sof'cware program which will provide a centralized database of parcel related information regarding these Districts. Once completed and tested, access to Page 4, Item ~ Meeting Date 12/19/00 the program will be licensed to the City and made available to City staff through Interact remote access. MuniFinancial has incurred the development costs of this program without cost to the City. The cost of maintaining the data contained in the program will be absorbed in the regular consulting fees paid under this Agreement. This program, which should be operational by the third quarter of 2001, will aid City staff in accessing pertinent parcel related information in response to public and other outside inquiries and also for internal uses. Upon execution of the license agreement, which would be signed after the program is operational, the City's license to access the program shall be at no additional cost. FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that the yearly cost for the services will be less than $25,000. However, this cost may vary since it is dependent on the number of parcels that become delinquent. Fixed costs will be paid by the $16.00 per parcel administrative charge collected on the tax bill for all assessment districts. For other charges related to specific delinquencies, funds are advanced from the administrative charge in anticipation of ultimate recovery from the delinquent property owners. Since all costs are paid by the property owners, there is no fiscal impact to the City. Ely going through this process and collecting the delinquent assessments, the City will avoid future liabilities. Attachments: A Proposed Agreement with MuniFinancial, Inc. for Assessment District Delinquency Monitoring Services. H:\HO ME~EN GIN EER~,AGEN DA~,ADDELIN 1 .EMC.DOC FILE 0340-10 AD 006 '2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AWARDING A THREE-YEAR AGREEMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DELINQUENCY MONITORING TO MUNIFINANCIAL, INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, in accordance with Chula vista Municipal Code 2.56.230, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was prepared by staff and sent to 10 firms; and WHEREAS, two firms responded to the RFP, MuniFinancial and NBS Government Finance Group; and WHEREAS, the selection committee felt MuniFinancail was the better choice for the new contract based on the interview criteria and because they were stronger in the following areas: project team and area knowledge, current experience handling the present contract and quality of work performed under the existing contract; and WHEREAS, the proposed agreement will retain the services of MuniFinancial, Inc. to perform delinquency monitoring services on existing city Assessment Districts and coordinate the collection of all delinquent installment payments on these Districts, as requested by the city, for the time period January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003; and fiduciary providing WHEREAS, this action will ensure responsibility to the bondholders these required services; and that the City's is fulfilled by WHEREAS, all costs associated with collection of delinquent assessments are recovered from the delinquent property owners at no expense. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby award a three-year agreement for Assessment District delinquency monitoring to MuniFinancial, Inc., a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the city Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of Chula vista is hereby authorized to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by tft~~~ C Y Attorney John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works [H:\HOME\ATTORNEY\RESO\ MuniFinancial Agreement (December 13, 2000 (8:15am)] Parties and Recital Page(s) Agreement between City of Chu1a Vista and MuniFinancial, Inc./A Willdan Company for Assessment District Delinquency Monitoring and Co11ection Services This agreement ("Agreement"), dated for the purposes of reference only, and effective as of the date last executed unless another date is otherwise specified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 1 is between the City-related entity as is indicated on Exhibit A, paragraph 2, as such ("City"), whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 3, and the entity indicated on the attached Exhibit A, paragraph 4, as Consultant, whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 5, and whose place of business and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 6 ("Consultant"), and is made with reference to the following facts: Recitals Whereas, the City has formed Assessment Districts pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 to impose assessments on benefitting properties to finance the construction of various improvements; and, Whereas, limited obligation bonds were issued to fund the unpaid assessments pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915; and, Whereas, the City must begin judicial foreclosure proceedings when parcels become delinquent on their assessment installment; and, Whereas, Consultant warrants and represents that they are experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can prepare and deliver the services required of Consultant to City within the time frames herein provided all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; (End of Recitals. Next Page starts Obligatory Provisions.) 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 1 ( .J Obligatory provisions Pages NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant do hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Duties A. General Duties Consultant shall perform all of the services described on the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, entitled "General Duties"; and, B. Scope of Work and Schedule In the process of performing and delivering said "General Duties", Consultant shall also perform all of the services described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, entitled "Scope of Work and Schedule", not inconsistent with the General Duties, according to, and within the time frames set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, and deliver to City such Deliverables as are identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, within the time frames set forth therein, time being of the essence of this agreement. The General Duties and the work and deliverables required in the Scope of Work and Schedule shall be herein referred to as the "Defined Services". Failure to complete the Defined Services by the times indicated does not, except at the option of the City, operate to terminate this Agreement. C. Reductions in Scope of Work City may independently, or upon request from Consultant, from time to time reduce the Defined Services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Consult&nt agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation associated with said reduction. D. Additional Services In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set forth, City may require Consultant to perform additional consulting services related to the Defined Services ("Additional Services"), and upon doing so in writing, if they are within the scope of services offered by Consultant, Consultant shall perform same on a time and materials basis at the rates set forth in the "Rate Schedule" in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11 (C), unless a separate fixed fee is otherwise agreed upon. All compensation for Additional Services shall be paid monthly as billed. 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 2 f-/ E. Standard of Care Consultant, in performing any Services under this agreement, whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. F. Insurance Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and subconsultants employed by it in connection with the Services required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss by the following insurance coverages, in the following categories, and to the limits specified, policies of which are issued by Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V" or better, or shall meet with the approval of the City: Statutory Worker's Compensation Liability Insurance coverage in the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 9. Insurance and Employer's amount set forth in the Commercial General Liability Insurance including Business Automobile Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, combined single limit applied separately to each project away from premises owned or rented by Consultant, which names City as an Additional Insured, and which is primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("Primary Coverage"), and which treats the employees of the City in the same manner as members of the general public ("Cross-liability Coverage") . Errors and Omissions insurance, in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, unless Errors and Omissions coverage is included in the General Liability policy. G. Proof of Insurance Coverage. (1) Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein required, prior to the commencement of services required under this Agreement, by delivery of Certificates of Insurance demonstrating same, and further indicating that the policies may not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the Additional Insured. (2) Policy Endorsements Required. In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured Coverage, Primary Coverage and Cross-liability Coverage required under 2ptyl3.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 3 f Consultant's Commercial General Liability Insurance Policy, Consultant shall deliver a policy endorsement to the City demonstrating same, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Risk Manager. H. Securitv for Performance. (1) Performance Bond. In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide a Performance Bond (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled "Performance Bond"), then Consultant shall provide to the City a performance bond by a surety and in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney which amount is indicated in the space adjacent to the term, "Performance Bond", in said Paragraph 19, Exhibit A. (2) Letter of Credit. In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide a Letter of Credit (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled "Letter of Credit"), then Consultant shall provide to the City an irrevocable letter of credit callable by the City at their unfettered discretion by submitting to the bank a letter, signed by the City Manager, stating that the Consultant is in breach of the terms of this Agreement. The letter of credit shall be issued by a bank, and be in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney which amount is indicated in the space adjacent to the term, "Letter of Credit", in said Paragraph 19, Exhibit A. (3) Other Security In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide security other than a Performance Bond or a Letter of Credit (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled "Other Security"), then Consultant shall provide to the City such other security therein listed in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney. I. Business License Consultant agrees to obtain a business license from the City and to otherwise comply with Title 5 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 4 I" I 0" 2. Duties of the City A. Consultation and Cooperation City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose of reviewing the progress of the Defined Services and Schedule therein contained, and to provide direction and guidance to achieve the objectives of this agreement. The City shall permit access to its office facilities, files and records by Consultant throughout the term of the agreement. In addition thereto, City agrees to provide the information, data, items and materials set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 10, and with the further understanding that delay in the provision of these materials beyond 30 days after authorization to proceed, shall constitute a basis for the justifiable delay in the Consultant's performance of this agreement. B. Compensation Upon receipt of a properly prepared billing from Consultant submitted to the City periodically as indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, but in no event more frequently than monthly, on the day of the period indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, City shall compensate Consultant for all services rendered by Consultant according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11, adjacent to the governing compensation relationship indicated by a "checkmark" next to the appropriate arrangement, subject to the requirements for retention set forth in paragraph 19 of Exhibit A, and shall compensate Consultant for out of pocket expenses as provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 12. All billings submitted by Consultant shall contain sufficient information as to the propriety of the billing to permit the City to evaluate that the amount due and payable thereunder is proper, and shall specifically contain the City's account number indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 18 (C) to be charged upon making such payment. 3. Administration of Contract Each party designates the individuals (" Contract Administrators") indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 13, as said party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to represent them in the routine administration of this agreement. 4 . Term This Agreement shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all executory provisions hereof. 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 5 ( , , ) 5. Liquidated Damages The provisions of this section apply if a Liquidated Damages Rate is provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14. It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the essence in the completion of this Agreement. It is difficult to estimate the amount of damages resulting from delay in performance. The parties have used their judgment to arrive at a reasonable amount to compensate for delay. Failure to complete the Defined Services within the allotted time period specified in this Agreement shall result in the following penalty: For each consecutive calendar day in excess of the time specified for the completion of the respective work assignment or Deliverable, the consultant shall pay to the City, or have withheld from monies due, the sum of Liquidated Damages Rate provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14 ("Liquidated Damages Rate") . Time extensions for delays beyond the consultant's control, other than delays caused by the City, shall be requested in writing to the City's Contract Administrator, or designee, prior to the expiration of the specified time. Extensions of time, when granted, will be based upon the effect of delays to the work and will not be granted for delays to minor portions of work unless it can be shown that such delays did or will delay the progress of the work. 6. Financial Interests of Consultant A. Consultant is Designated as an FPPC Filer. If Consultant is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 15, as an "FPPC filer", Consultant is deemed to be a "Consultant" for the purposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and disclosure provisions, and shall report economic interests to the City Clerk on the required Statement of Economic Interests in such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph 15 of Exhibit A, or if none are specified, then as determined by the City Attorney. B. Decline to Participate. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant shall not make, or participate in making or in any way attempt to use Consultant's position to influence a governmental decision in which Consultant knows or has reason to know Consultant has a financial interest other than the compensation promised by this Agreement. 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 6 t. C. Search to Determine Economic Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant warrants and represents that Consultant has diligently conducted a search and inventory of Consultant's economic interests, as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and has determined that Consultant does not, to the best of Consultant's knowledge, have an economic interest which would conflict with Consultant's duties under this agreement. D. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will not acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during the term of this Agreement which would constitute a conflict of interest as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act. E. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Consultant learns of an economic interest of Consultant's which may result in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair Political Practices Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder. F. Specific warranties Against Economic Interests. Consultant warrants and represents that neither Consultant, nor Consultant's immediate family members, nor Consultant's employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, or in any property within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, ("Prohibited Interest"), other than as listed in Exhibit A, Paragraph 15. Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment, remuneration, consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant Associates in connection with Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Consultant promises to advise City of any such promise that may be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter. Consultant agrees that Consultant Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or 2ptyl3.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 7 " .) . ) ~ for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement, except with the written permission of City. Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement, or for any third party which may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement, except with the written permission of City. 7. Hold Harmless Consultant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the negligent conduct of the Consultant, or any agent or employee, subcontractors, or others in connection with the execution of the work covered by this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, or employees. Consultant's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and liability incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to judgment or not. Further, Consultant at its own expense shall, upon written request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents or employees. Consultant's indemnification of City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant. 8. Termination of Agreement for Cause If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner Consultant's obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by Consultant's breach. 9. Errors and Omissions In the event that the City Administrator determines that the Consultants' negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance of 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 8 / I ,/, ,J _/ work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater than would have resulted if there were no such negligence, errors, omissions, Consultant shall reimburse City for any additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended to limit City's rights under other provisions of this agreement. 10. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason, by giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials described herein above shall, at the option of the City, become City'S sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except as set forth herein. 11. Assignability The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of City. City hereby consents to the assignment of the portions of the Defined Services identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 17 to the subconsultants identified thereat as "Permitted Subconsultants". 12. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement. Any reuse of such material by City on any project other than the project which is the subject of this agreement shall be at the sole risk of the City. 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 9 13. Independent Contractor City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this Agreement. City maintains the right only to rej ect or accept Consultant's work products. Consultant and any of the Consultant's agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. Therefore, City will not withhold state or federal income tax, social security tax or any other payroll tax, and Consultant shall be solely responsible for the payment of same and shall hold the City harmless with regard thereto. 14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City and acted upon by the City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same. Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. 15. Attorney's Fees Should a dispute arising out of this Agreement result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to a judgment against the other for an amount equal to reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred. The "prevailing party" shall be deemed to be the party who is awarded substantially the relief sought. 16. Statement of Costs In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or participates in the preparation of a report or document in performing the Defined Services, Consultant shall include, or cause the inclusion of, in said report or document, a statement of the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or document. 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 10 { - 17. Miscellaneous A. Consultant not authorized to Represent City Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Consultant shall have no authority to act as City's agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever. B. Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman If the box on Exhibit A, Paragraph 16 is marked, the Consultant and/or their principals is/are licensed with the State of California or some other state as a licensed real estate broker or salesperson. Otherwise, Consultant represents that neither Consultant, nor their principals are licensed real estate brokers or salespersons. C. Notices All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified herein as the places of business for each of the designated parties. D. Entire Agreement This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought. E. Capacity of Parties Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement, and that all resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement. 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 11 f .cJ F. Governing Law/Venue This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista. [end of page. next page is signature page.] 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 12 IV Signature Page to Agreement between City of Chula Vista and MuniFinancial, Inc./A Willdan Company for Assessment District Delinquency Monitoring and Collection Services IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement thereby indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms: Dated: , 20 City of Chula Vista by: Shirley Horton, Mayor Attest: Susan Bigelow, City Clerk Approved as to form: Dated: Exhibit List to Agreement (X) Exhibit A. 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 13 f ;( Exhibit A to Agreement between City of Chula Vista and MuniFinancial, Inc./A Willdan Company 1. Effective Date of Agreement: Upon Approval by City Council 2. City-Related Entity: (X) City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of the State of California Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula' Vista, a political subdivision of the State of California () Industrial Development Authority of the City of Chula Vista, a () Other: [insert business form] a 3. Place of Business for City: City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 Voice Phone: (619) 691-5258 Fax Phone: (619) 691-5171 4. Consultant: MuniFinancial, Inc.fA Willdan Company 5. Business Form of Consultant: ( ) Sole Proprietorship ( ) Partnership (X) Corporation 6. Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Consultant: 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, California 92590 Voice Phone: (909) 699-3990 Fax Phone: (909) 699-3460 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 14 / 7. General Duties: The Consultant shall be responsible for coordinating the collection of all delinquent installment payments as requested by the City for any Assessment District within the City of Chula Vista assigned during the time period January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003 in accordance with the City's covenants in the Bond Indenture for each Assessment District. 8. Scope of Work and Schedule: A. Detailed Scope of Work: 1) Based upon data obtained from the County tax Collector reflecting payments received and posted by the County, the Consultant shall provide timely bi-annual reports of delinquent parcels to the City and coordinate inquiries from delinquent property owners. 2) Upon authorization by the City after receipt and approval of the reports, the Consultant shall contact the delinquent property owner by way of delinquency reminder, demand and foreclosure letters, sent on the Consultant's letterhead, in an attempt to rectify the delinquency. The delinquency reminder and demand letters shall be sent by United States First Class Mail; the foreclosure letters shall be sent via Certified Mail. Copies of detail reports showing which property owners were sent reminder, demand and foreclosure letters shall be forwarded to the City. 3) The Consultant shall be responsible for requesting direct payments to the City by the delinquent property owners and removal of the delinquent assessments from the County tax roll. All delinquent payments, which shall also include penalties and Consultant's fees, shall be made out to the City. 4) While still acting pursuant to covenants the City has in the Bond Indenture, the Consultant shall be responsible for negotiating repayment schedules as the City may approve with the delinquent property owners to avoid foreclosure, if this is acceptable to the property owners. 5) The Consultant shall, at the City's request or the Consultant's inability to collect the adequate installments, turn over any uncollected delinquencies to Foreclosure Counsel with the consent of the City via letter in a timely manner so that judicial foreclosure proceedings can be initiated pursuant to the City's Covenants in the Bond Indenture and the City's contract with Foreclosure Counsel. 2pty13.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 15 f~o 6) The Consultant is currently developing a new software program which shall provide a centralized database of information regarding special districts administered by the Consultant for the City and general parcel related information regarding Assessment Districts. Once completed and tested, access to the program shall be licensed to the City and made available to City staff through Internet remote access. The Consultant has incurred the costs of development of the program without cost to the City. Upon execution of the Consultant's license agreement, the City's license to access the System shall be at no additional cost. The Consultant shall absorb the cost of maintaining data contained in the program as part of the regular consulting fees paid under this Agreement. B. Date for Commencement of Consultant Services: (X) Same as Effective Date of Agreement ( ) Other: C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables: Deliverable No.1: shall be as specified in each Assessment District's Bond Indenture for items included under Scope of Work, otherwise, the time limits therefore are as soon as is reasonably possible by Consultant. D. Date for completion of all Consultant services: That date when all delinquent parcels assigned to Consultant have been resolved or upon notification from of contract termination. the City 9. Insurance Requirements: (X) Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance () Employer's Liability Insurance coverage: (X) Commercial General Liability Insurance: $1,000,000. (X) Errors and Omissions insurance: $250,000 (not included in Commercial General Liability coverage) . 10. Materials Required to be Supplied by City to Consultant: The City shall furnish the Consultant with the following documents and information: A. Dates the Bonds in each existing District were issued (the closing dates) . 2pty13.wpStandard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 16 t.././ B. Dates of the bonds in each existing district. C. Beginning years of debt service and initial interest rate on the bonds. D. Last years of debt service and final interest rate on the bonds. E. Copies of the following resolutions for each of the districts: 1. Confirming the assessments and ordering construction of the improvements. 2. Authorizing issuance of the bonds and approving the terms thereof'. 3. Authorizing the foreclosure action. 4. Authorizing the execution of this agreement. F. Bond Indenture Documents. 11. Compensation: A. () Sin~le Fixed Fee Arrangement. For performance of all of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay a single fixed fee in the amounts and at the times or milestones or for the Deliverables set forth below: Single Fixed Fee Amount: payable as follows: Milestone or Event or Deliverable Amount or Percent of Fixed Fee () 1. Interim Monthly Advances. The City shall make interim monthly advances against the compensation due for each phase on a percentage of completion basis for each given phase such that, at the end of each phase only the compensation for that phase has been paid. Any payments made hereunder shall be considered as interest free loans which must be returned to the City if the Phase is not satisfactorily completed. If the Phase is satisfactorily completed, the City shall receive credit against the compensation due for that phase. The retention amount or' percentage set forth in Paragraph 19 is to be applied to each interim payment such that, at the end of the phase, the full retention has been held back from the compensation due for that phase. Percentage of completion of a phase shall be assessed in the sole and unfettered discretion by the Contracts Administrator designated herein by the City, or such other person as the City Manager shall designate, but only upon such proof demanded by the City that has been provided, but in 2pty13.wpStandard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 17 r JcJJ- no event shall such interim advance payment be made unless the Contractor shall have represented in writing that said percentage of completion of the phase has been performed by the Contractor. The practice of making interim monthly advances shall not convert this agreement to a time and materials basis of payment. B. ( ) Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement. For the performance of each phase or portion of the Defined Services by Consultant as are separately identified below, City shall pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services, in the amounts and at the times or milestones or Deliverables set forth . Consultant shall not commence Services under any Phase, and shall not be entitled to the compensation for a Phase, unless City shall have issued a notice to proceed to Consultant as to said Phase. Phase Fee for Said Phase 1. $ 2. $ 3. $ () 1. Interim Monthly Advances. The City shall make interim monthly advances against the compensation due for each phase on a percentage of completion basis for each given phase such that, at the end of each phase only the compensation for that phase has been paid. Any payments made hereunder shall be considered as interest free loans which must be returned to the City if the Phase is not satisfactorily completed. If the Phase is satisfactorily completed, the City shall receive credit against the compensation due for that phase. The retention amount or percentage set forth in Paragraph 19 is to be applied to each interim payment such that, at the end of the phase, the full retention has been held back from the compensation due for that phase. Percentage of completion of a phase shall be assessed in the sole and unfettered discretion by the Contracts Administrator designated herein by the City, or such other person as the City Manager shall designate, but only upon such proof demanded by the City that has been provided, but in 2pty13.wpStandard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 18 F023 no event shall such interim advance payment be made unless the Contractor shall have represented in writing that said percentage of completion of the phase has been performed by the Contractor. The practice of making interim monthly advances shall not convert this agreement to a time and materials basis of payment. C. () Hourly Rate Arrangement For performance of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay Consultant for the productive hours of time spent by Consultant. in the performance of said Services, at the rates or amounts set forth in the Rate Schedule herein below according to the following terms and conditions: (1) () Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and Materials Arrangement Notwithstanding the expenditure by Consultant of time and materials in excess of said Maximum Compensation amount, Consultant agrees that Consultant shall perform all of the Defined Services herein required of Consultant for $ including all Materials, and other "reimbursables" ("Maximum Compensation") . (2) () Limitation without Further Authorization on Time and Materials Arrangement At such time as Consultant shall have incurred time and materials equal to ("Authorization Limit"), Consultant shall not be entitled to any addi- tional compensation without further authorization issued in writing and approved by the City. Nothing herein shall preclude Consultant from providing additional Services at Consultant's own cost and expense. (3) (X) Additional Services Upon Request At any time during the term of this agreement the City Engineer may request the Consultant to perform additional services. The Consultant shall perform the same on a time and material basis at the rates listed below, in an amount not to exceed $5,000 per year. 2pty13.wpStandard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 19 ) of .-- Rate Schedule Category of Employee of Consultant Name of Employee Hourly Rate Division Manager Paul Whitelaw, Lyn Gruber $180.00 $125.00 $105.00 $85.00 $75.00 $65.00 Senior Project Manager Project Manager Senior Analyst Analyst Analyst Assistant Property Owner Services Representative Support Staff Pam Hargesheimer Gladys Medina $50.00 $45.00 ( ) Hourly rates may increase by 6% for services rendered after [month], 19 ,if delay in providing services is caused by City. D. (X) Other The City shall pay to the Consultant an annual base fee of $2,500.00 in January of each year of the contract after receipt of an invoice from the Consultant. For performance of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay Consultant a fee for each Item of Work per parcel. A parcel that is delinquent in more than one district shall be billed for reminder and demand letters as if delinquent in only one district. The fees listed below are invoiced to the City as the services are performed; the fees shall be payable upon receipt of invoice and verification of its completeness and correctness. Payment plan fees shall be payable to the Consultant upon receipt of the first installment from the delinquent property owners. The Items of Work and their corresponding fees are set forth below: 2pty13.wpStandard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 20 f ) ,- , .> '-' Delinquency Reminder Letter $20 per parcel' Delinquency Demand Letter $30 per parcel Delinquency Foreclosure Letter $42 per parcel Effect Removal from tax roll $102 per parcel per district Subsequent Foreclosure Services2 $150 per parcel per district Payment Plan $200 per parcel per district 12. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement For the cost of out of pocket expenses incurred by Consultant in the performance of services herein required, City shall pay Consultant at the rates or amounts set forth below: ( ) None, the compensation includes all costs. Cost or Rate ( ) Reports, not to exceed $ (Xl Copies, not to exceed $0.06: (xl Travel, not to exceed $0.325 per mile: ( ) Printing, not to exceed $ (X) Postage, not to exceed actual costs: ( ) Delivery, not to exceed $ (X) Long Distance Telephone Charges, not to exceed actual costs: 13. Contract Administrators: City: Elizabeth Chopp, civil Engineer or Veronica Roble, Accountant, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 'If an owner owns more than twenty-five (25) delinquent parcels in any district, these per parcel fees shall be reduced by one-half (1/2). Reminder letters for each parcel shall be ten dollars ($10.00); demand letters shall be fifteen dollars ($15.00); foreclosure letters shall be twenty-one dollars ($21.00); and payment plans shall be one hundred dollars ($100.00) . 2Subsequent foreclosure fees shall only be paid to the Consultant if and when the delinquent installment is collected by the Consultant in accordance with the City'S Covenants in the Bond Indenture. Delinquent installments that are not collected by the Consultant shall not be charged Subsequent Foreclosure Service Fees. 2pty13.wpStandard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 21 f ,)(" Consultant: Paul Whitelaw, MuniFinancial, Inc., 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200, Temecula, CA 92590 14. Liquidated Damages Rate: None $ per day. Other: 15. Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code: (X) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer. Reporting ( ) FPPC Filer Category NO.1. Investments and sources of income. Category No.2. Interests in real property. Category No.3. Investments, interest in real property and sources of income subject to the regulatory, permit or licensing authority of the department. () Category No.4. Investments in business entities and sources of income which engage in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property. () Category No.5. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the City of Chula Vista (Redevelopment Agency) to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. () Category No.6. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the designated employee's department to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. () Category No.7. Business positions. ( ) List "Consultant Associates" interests in real property within 2 radial miles of Project Property, if any: 2pty13.wpStandard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 22 f oJ 7 16. () Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman 17. Permitted Subconsu1tants: NIA 18. Bill Processing: (1) Consultant's Billing to be submitted for the following period of time: ( ) Monthly ( ) Quarterly (x) Annually, for annual base fee. (X) Other: As services are rendered per paragraph lID of Exhibit A. (2) Day of the Period for submission of Consultant's Billing: ( ) First of the Month ( ) 15th Day of each Month ( ) End of the Month (3) City's Account Number: nla (Payment from delinquent parcels.) 19. Security for Performance Performance Bond, $ Letter of Credit, $ Other Security: Type: Amount: $ () Retention. If this space is checked, then notwithstanding other provisions to the contrary requiring the payment of compensation to the Consultant sooner, the City shall be entitled to retain, at their option, either the following "Retention Percentage" or "Retention Amount" until the City determines that the Retention Release Event, listed below, has occurred: Retention Percentage: % Retention Amount: $ Retention Release Event: ( ) Completion of All Consultant Services ( ) Other: 2pty13.wpStandard Form Two Party Agreement (Thirteenth Revision) May 25, 1999 Page 23 r u ",) COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Meeting Date 12/19/00 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving a Detention Basin Maintenance, Grading Mitigation and Erosion, Sedimentation and Storm Water Pollution Control Agreement between the City and NNP-Trimark San Miguel LLC, and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement. Director of Public Works ~ SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~0(~1D. (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X ) Council is requested to consider the approval of an agreement with NNP-Trimark San Miguel LLC, the Developer of San Miguel, setting forth the obligations of the Developer for implementing grading mitigation measures, constructing and maintaining desilting basins and other erosion and storm water pollution control measures required by the project's tentative map Conditions of Approval. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the Resolution approving a Detention Basin Maintenance, Grading Mitigation and Erosion, Sedimentation and Storm Water Pollution Control Agreement between the City and NNP-Trimark San Miguel LLC and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The Tentative Map conditions for the proposed development of San Miguel Ranch (Chula Vista Tract No. 99-04, Resolution No. 2000-068, approved on February 18, 2000) require that the Developer enter into an agreement prior to the approval of any grading permit and/or final maps for the project to assure the following: 1. Implementation of all applicable mitigation measures identified in the CEQA Findings of Fact and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (FSEIR 97-02 Resolution No. 19630, certified on October 19,1999); 2. Construction and maintenance of detention facilities; 3. Compliance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System storm water discharge requirements applicable to grading, construction of street improvements and landscaping; 4. Indemnifying the City from liability due to erosion, siltation, or increase in flow resulting from the project. Also on tonight's agenda are three other Resolutions and an Ordinance related to the San Miguel Ranch Project: 1) approving the four-party Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Annexation Agreement between the City, the County, the Resource Agencies and the Developer; 2) The San Miguel Ranch Reorganization involving the annexation of 742.94 acres to the City, the detachment of 742.94 acres from County Service Area No. 135 and the detachment of 1.03 acres ,7 / Page 2, Item Meeting Date 12/19/00 from the Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District, subject to execution of the project's required MSCP Annexation Agreement; and 3) An Indemnification Agreement between the City and the Developer. The Ordinance is to establish and fund a permanent mechanism to pay the City for financing the preparation of annual fiscal reviews and deficit analyses for the San Miguel Ranch Project. These Resolutions and the Ordinance must be approved before the City will issue a grading permit. Currently, Trimark-Pacific Homes is processing through the City departments, rough grading plans for three of the project's four phases, in the area north of Proctor Valley Road and east of the SR 125 alignment. Due to the need to complete grading activities in project areas that are within 200 feet of gnatcatcher breeding areas before March 1, the grading permit is scheduled to be issued before the approval of the project's master final map and its associated agreements. This Agreement, therefore, serves as partial satisfaction of certain tentative map conditions, specifically related to grading, prior to execution of the Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement. A cash deposit to guarantee installation of erosion, sedimentation and water pollution control measures and a performance bond to assure that proper maintenance of the measures secures this Agreement. The proposed Agreement stipulates that the City may issue stop work notices and ultimately withhold building permits if the City determines the Developer not to be in compliance with the terms of the Agreement. The form of the Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney FISCAL IMPACT: None. The Developer will be responsible for all mitigation measures, for maintaining all erosion control measures and drainage improvements until acceptance of public facilities by the City. On-going maintenance of one permanent detention basin onsite will be assumed by a private entity or a maintenance district. Attachments: Exhibit A: Location Plat H:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA\SMR Delention Basin Agt doc 12/14/00 12:55:25 PM RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A DETENTION BASIN MAINTENANCE, GRADING MITIGATION AND EROSION, SEDIMENTATION AND STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND NNP- TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Council is requested to consider the approval of an agreement with Trimark-Pacific Homes, the developer of San Miguel Ranch, setting forth the obligations of the developer for implementing grading mitigation measures, constructing and maintaining desilting basins and other erosion and storm water pollution control measures required by the project's tentative map Conditions of Approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve a Detention Basin Maintenance, Grading Mitigation and Erosion, Sedimentation and Strom Water Pollution Control Agreement between the City and NNP- Trimark San Miguel LLC, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE Chula vista Agreement on IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of is hereby authorized and directed to execute said behalf of the city of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works ..f? <J}1\ '~ ;~Kaheny City Attorney [H:\HOME\ATTORNEY\RESO\ Detention Basin Agreement SMR (December 14, 2000 (11: 8am)] 9. 4 Recording Requested by: CITY CLERK When Recorded, Mail to: CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 No Transfer tax is due as this is a Conveyance to a public agency of less Than a fee interest for which no cash Consideration has been paid or received. SAN MIGUEL RANCH DETENTION BASIN MAINTENANCE, GRADING MITIGATION, AND EROSION, SEDIMENTATION AND STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AGREEMENT This Agreement is made by and between NNP-Trimark San Miguel Ranch LLC, ("Developer"), and the City of Chula Vista, a California municipal corporation ("City"), with reference to the following facts: RECITALS A. NNP-Trimark San Miguel Ranch LLC, ("Developer"), is the Master Developer of approximately 434-acre portion ("Project") of that certain real property commonly known as San Miguel Ranch (Chula Vista Tract 99-04) ("Property"), as described on Exhibit "A", and shown on Exhibit "A-1. B. On October 19, 1999, the Chula Vista City Council, pursuant to Resolution No.19630, and in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 97-02 (FSEIR 97-02), made certain Findings of Fact, adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations. C. On February 18, 2000, the Chu1a Vista City Council, pursuant to Resolution No.2000-068 approved Chu1a Vista Tract No 99-04 (Herein referred to as the "Project's Tentative Map"), D. Condition number 8 of the Project's Tentative Map, as more particularly set forth on Exhibit "B", provides that the 1 :7.- __ Developer may apply for a permit to do work on the property prior to the approval of a final map. If said permit application is approved, and the Developer proceeds with the work, all work performed by the developer prior to approval of the applicable final Map shall be at Developer's own risk. Said permits do not constitute a guarantee that subsequent submi ttals (i. e., final Map and improvement plans) will be approved. E. Condition number 15 of the Project's Tentative Map, as more particularly set forth on Exhibit "Bn, requires the Developer to enter into a supplemental subdivision agreement to implement all applicable mitigation measures identified in FSEIR 97-02, the CEQA Findings of Fact and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. F. Condition number 63 of the Project's Tentative Map, as more particularly set forth on Exhibit "Bn, requires the Developer to construct detention facilities upon the request of the City Engineer, to assure that the maximum allowable discharges after development do not exceed pre-development discharges, and to provide for the future maintenance of the detention basin facilities through the establishment of a landscaping maintenance district or other mechanism, as approved by the City Engineer. G. Condition number 67 of the Project's Tentative Map, as more particularly set forth on Exhibit "Bn, requires the Developer to comply with all the provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and the Clean Water Program during and after all phases of the development process, including but not limited to: mass grading, rough grading, construction of street and landscaping improvements, and construction of dwelling units. H. Condition numbers 73 and 90 e. of the Project's Tentative Map, as more particularly set forth on Exhibit "Bn, requires the Developer to enter into an agreement with the City wherein the City is held harmless from any liability from erosion, sedimentation or increase in the flow of drainage resulting from the Project. I. Condition number 179 of the Project's Tentative Map, as more particularly set forth in Exhibit "Bn, requires the Developer to comply with applicable regulations established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as set forth in the N.P.D.E.S. permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge and any regulations adopted by the City 2 9-iQ of Chula Vista pursuant to the N. P. D. E. S. regulations or requirements. Further, the developer is required to file a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board to obtain coverage under the N. P. D. E. S. General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity and shall implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) concurrent with commencement of grading acti vi ties. The SWPPP shall include both construction and post construction pollution prevention and pollution control measures and shall identify funding mechanisms for post construction control measures. J. The Developer has applied for and seeks approval of a Land Development Permit (Grading Permit) prior to the approval of a final map and a Supplemental Subdivision Agreement for the Project. K. Developer has proposed on plans submitted to the City that certain permanent and temporary desilting basins, slope protection and other erosion control measures, as shown on Chula Vista Drawings Nos. 00040-1 through 00040-62 ("Grading Plans") are adequate to meet the drainage control and sedimentation control requirements of the Conditions for the grading proposed for the Project on said Grading Plans. NOW THEREFORE IT BE RESOLVED that the Parties agree as follows: 1. Defined Terms. shall mean. As used herein, the following terms 1.1 "Complete Construction" construction of the improvements have been been inspected and accepted by the City. shall mean that completed and have 1.2 "Interim Measures" shall mean any sedimentation control measures, erosion control measures, storm water runoff pollution control measures, velocity control measures and noise attenuation measures, which are not specifically shown in-place on the approved Grading Plans for the Project but which are required by the Project's Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures or determined by the City Engineer to be necessary, to protect downstream properties, adjacent areas and sensitive habitats until the Land Development is completed or Permanent Measures are installed. The Interim Measures may utilize the same details, or general descriptions as those shown the Project's Grading Plans and/or Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), but would be located as necessary to 3 9--; Prevention Plan (SWPPP), but would be located as necessary to accomplish the intended erosion control, sedimentation control, pollution control, velocity control, and noise control purposes. 1.3 "Permanent Measures" shall mean any erosion, sedimentation or storm water pollution control measure that is determined by the City Engineer to be adequate to provide protection for at least one (1) year, with normal and routine maintenance, of downstream properties, including sensi ti ve habitat and open space, from erosion, sedimentation or polluted runoff. Permanent Measures shall include permanent slope planting or hydroseeding as shown on the approved Slope Erosion Control Landscape and Irrigation Plans approved by the City for the Project, the temporary and permanent desilting basins, and the measures as described in Mitigation Measures 9 (section 6.1 below) Street paving or hardscape shall be considered a Permanent Measure only if it is combined with ei ther permanent or temporary desil ting basins or runoff pollution control measures listed in Mitigation Measure 9, that are continuously maintained to the satisfaction of the City Engineer until the complete construction of all improvements. 1.4 "Maintain" or "Maintenance" shall mean to furnish, or the furnishing of, services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance required for the operational integrity of any Interim or Permanent Measure as may be required to be installed during the course of the Land Development. 1.5 "Land Development", "Grade", "Grading", "Rough Grading", "Erosion", shall all have the same definitions as found for these terms in the Chula Vista Grading Ordinance, Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 15.04. 1.6 "Project" shall mean Phases 1, 2 and 4 of San Miguel Ranch Tract 99-04 as depicted in Exhibits A and A-I. 2. Construction. Developer agrees to construct private, temporary erosion control and desilting basins ("Temporary Basins") and the permanent detention basin within Tentative Open Space M-B (Lot N) ("Permanent Basin"), to control the quantity and quality of runoff from the Project during and after the Land Development as shown on the approved Grading Plans upon the request and at the direction of the City Engineer. Developer further agrees to complete construction of such basins no later than thirty (30) days after completion of 4 r 9-J' the temporary or permanent basins. 3. Basin Operation and Maintenance. 3.1 Temporary Basins. Developer shall operate and maintain each temporary basin shown on the Grading Plans until such time as all of the land area that drains into each basin is developed, landscaped or otherwise permanently protected from erosion, as determined by the City Engineer. 3.2 Permanent Basin. The permanent detention basin within Open Space M-B (Lot N) on the Project's Tentative Map shall be maintained by the Developer until such time as the maintenance of the permanent basin is assumed by a maintenance district or other mechanism to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, as required by Condition 63 of Project's Tentative Map. 3.3 Basin Maintenance. Maintenance of each Temporary Basin and the Permanent Basin shall include the removal of silt, sediment and debris, the repair of embankments, outlet structures, velocity control devices and any other work as directed by the City Engineer in order to assure the proper functioning of these facilities. The operation of Temporary and Permanent Basins shall comply with all the provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (N.P.D.E.S.) permit requirements, including the requirements of the N.P.D.E.S. General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity. The Developer understands and agrees that Developer shall be solely responsible for the maintenance and operation of all storm drain facilities and appurtenances shown on the Grading Plans until released from this responsibility by the City. 4. Interim Measures. The Developer understands and agrees that if, during the grading of the Project, and based solely on the determination of the City Engineer that a condition exists which threatens downstream properties, adjacent areas or sensi ti ve habitats with erosive storm water velocities, contaminated runoff, excessive sedimentation or noise impacts, the City Engineer may order, in accordance with City Department of Public Works standard practices, that all grading operations immediately cease and desist or that certain Interim Measures as approved by the City Engineer be installed immediately. The Developer further understands and agrees that all grading operations may be halted until Developer installs the Interim Measures to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5 9- 1 5. Maintenance of Erosion, Sedimentation and Pollution Control Measures. The Developer agrees to maintain all temporary and permanent, erosion control, sedimentation control, storm water runoff pollution control measures, including those Interim Measures installed at the Direction of the City Engineer, during and after completion of Land Development, until released from the responsibility to maintain in accordance with Section 3.2 and 3.3 above. The developer agrees to conduct all Land Development in conformance with the IN. P. D. E. S. ) permi t requirements, including the requirements of the N.P.D.E.S. General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity and to implement and maintain all Best Management Practices described in the Project's approved (SWPPP). Developer understands and agrees that Developer is responsible for obtaining all necessary permits, approvals and certifications, if any, from the applicable federal or state agencies, including but not limited to California Department of Fish and Game and/or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 6. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Measures (FSEIR 97-02). Developer hereby agrees to comply with the following with reference to grading on the Property: 6.1 Measure No.9 - To design and construct all new and proposed parking lots and developed areas in and adjacent to the natural open space so that runoff does not drain directly into the open space. All developed and paved areas must prevent the release of toxins, chemicals, petroleum products, exotic plant materials, and other elements that might degrade or harm the natural environment or ecosystem. The developer agrees to use a variety of methods to accomplish this including natural detention basins, grass swales, or mechanical trapping devices. These systems should be maintained approximately once a year, or as often as needed, to ensure proper functioning. Maintenance should include dredging out sediments if needed, removing exotic plant materials, and adding chemical-neutralizing compounds (e. g. clay compounds) when necessary and appropriate. 6.2 Measure No. 16 - To utilize only heavy-duty construction equipment with modified combustion/fuel injection systems for emissions control during grading and construction. 6.3 Measure No. 17 - To hydroseed, landscape, or develop disturbed areas as directed by the City to reduce dust generation. 6 7- {) 6.4 Measure Nos.18 and 19 - To cover trucks hauling fill material and enforce a 20 mile-per-hour speed limit on unpaved surfaces. 6.5 Measure No. 20 - To water graded areas twice a day to control dust. Other mitigation measures shall be considered and implemented upon City approval. Such measures may include, but are not limited to, phasing grading so relatively smaller areas are exposed and revegetating graded areas as rapidly as possible. 6.6 Measure No. 21 - To implement the following noise mitigation measures: 6.6.1 Construction shall be hours of 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on limi ted to the to 6:00 p.m., and between 8:00 Saturday. 6.6.2 The Project contractor shall use power construction equipment with state-of- the-art noise shielding and muffling devices. 6.6.3 Temporary noise barriers, such as wooden barrier walls, mufflers, and noise attenuating devices shall be employed to reduce noise generated during construction. 6.7 Measure No. 39 To retain, pursuant to a "Treatment Plan and Research Design for the Mitigation of Impacts to Significant Sites at Rancho San Miguel" (by Brain F. Smith Associates dated April 23, 1998), a qualified archaeologist on-site who shall monitor the grading of the Proj ect and any related off -si te utility improvements to ensure that any significant deposits or artifacts not identified during the evaluation phase may be analyzed prior to the destruction of the archaeological sites. 6.8 Measure No. 41 - To divert, at the direction of the monitoring archaeologist, grading from any new or previously undetected portions of an archaeological site encountered during the grading of the Project or related improvements, to allow the site to be evaluated for importance. If the site is found to be unique, grading impacts would be considered significant and must be mitigated to below a level of significance as described in: "A Treatment Plan and 7 I-II Research Design for the Mitigation of Impacts to Significant Sites at Rancho San Miguel", or by preservation of the site. 6.9 Measure No. 43 To retain a qualified paleontologist who shall monitor all initial cuts in areas identified as potentially containing fossilliferous forming strata. The paleontologist shall be authorized to divert grading to allow for collection of appropriate materials. Developer further acknowledges and agrees that in the event that the City's Environmental Review Coordinator determines that the applicable Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) measures are not being implemented at the appropriate times and locations within the Project area, a notice to cease and desist all Land Development work will be issued in accordance with City Department of Public Works standard practices_and shall remain in effect until such time as the Environmental Review Coordinator of the City of Chula Vista has determined that said applicable measures have been and will continue to be implemented per the requirements of the MMRP. 7. Securities. Developer shall provide maintenance securities, as set forth below, Developer's Maintenance obligations hereunder. the to City with guarantee 7.1 Cash Deposit. Prior to issuance of the first Grading Permit for the Project, City Council consideration of this Agreement Developer shall provide the City with a cash deposit to guarantee Developer's Maintenance obligations and installation of Interim Measures in a timely manner under Sections 3, 4,and 5 of this Agreement in the sums set forth in Exhibit ~C". City shall hold the Security Deposit for the duration of Developer's Maintenance obligations hereunder, and expend such deposit solely for purposes in the performance of such obligations including installation and/or maintenance of Interim Measures in accordance with Sections 3, 4 and 5. In the event of Developer's default in the performance of its Maintenance obligations or installation of Interim Measures, the Developer shall be given 24 hours notice to begin correction and shall diligently pursue completion of measures to correct the default or the City has the option in its discretion to perform the required Maintenance or installation of Interim Measures should Developer default under its obligations or fail to diligently pursue completion of measures, as determined by the City Engineer. Developer agrees to pay to the City any difference between the total costs incurred by the City to perform such Maintenance and 8 '1' i~ the City to perform such Maintenance and installation work, and any proceeds from the Cash Deposit. Should the City expend the Cash Deposit due to Developer's default of its performance obligations, Developer agrees to redeposit the equivalent sum of money needed to equal the amount required by this Agreement, as set forth in Exhibit "C", within 30 days of the City's request for such deposit. All interest earnings on the Cash Deposit shall be retained by the City during this period. Any unexpended amount of the deposit, including any interest earned, shall be released and remitted to Developer within sixty (60) days upon the termination of its Maintenance obligations as set forth in this Agreement. 7.2 Bonds. Prior to issuance of the first Grading Permit for the Project, Developer shall provide the City with bonds for a series of one year terms starting from the date of issuance of the grading permit in connection with Chula Vista Drawing Nos. 00040-1 through 00040-62, in order to guarantee performanace of its basin Maintenance obligations under Section 3 of this agreement in the amounts more fully set forth in Exhibit "C". The Performance Bond(s) shall be issued by a surety with a Bests A, V rating or better and shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. The City Engineer will review the security provided herein every year prior to expiration thereof. The City acknowledges that bonds are issued for a one year period, however, it shall be the responsibility of Developer to ensure that at all times while Developer has outstanding obligations under this Agreement, security as required herein will be valid and in full force and effect. Developer understands and agrees that the City shall not issue building permits for the Project if the bonds or Cash Deposit are determined by the City to be insufficient or said bonds have not been renewed. At the bond renewal time, the City Engineer may reduce the bond requirement by an incremental amount determined by the City Engineer to reflect a reduction in Developer's Maintenance obligations. In addition, Developer may request that another form of equivalent security, such as a letter of credit or cash, acceptable to the City in its sole discretion, be substituted for the bonds described herein. Developer acknowledges and agrees that such reduction and substitution is in the sole discretion of the City. 7.3 Refund. In the event that the annual Maintenance costs are reduced or that Permanent Measures are 9 9-,3 City Engineer, the City Engineer may review at Developer's request to reduce, proportionately, the amount of the Cash Deposi t and/or Performance Bond required by this Section. City shall not unreasonably withhold approval of such request provided however that Developer's Obligations are adequately secured as determined by the City Engineer in his sole discretion. 8. Developer's Acknowledgment. With the execution of this Agreement the Developer acknowledges and agrees, in partial satisfaction of Condition No. 8 of the Resolution, that all work performed by the Developer prior to approval of the applicable final map shall be at Developer's own risk and that subsequent submittals (i.e., final maps and improvement plans) may require extensive changes, at Developers cost, to work done under any permit issued prior to the approval of a final map. 9. Building Permits. Developer acknowledges and agrees that the performance of Developer's obligations hereunder is required for the health and safety of the residents of the City of Chula Vista. Therefore, the Developer agrees that the City shall have the absolute and unfettered right to withhold the issuance of any building permit for any residential units within the Project if the Developer is determined by the City not to be in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Except for Sections 6 and 7.1, which have an optional 24-hour notice to begin correction period, if Developer is determined by the City not to be in compliance with any term of this Agreement, the City shall notify Developer of Developer's noncompliance and provide the Developer with 30 days to cure said noncompliance. 10. Indemnification. Developer further understands and agrees that City, as indemnitee, or any office or employee thereof, shall not be liable for any inj ury to person or property occasioned by reason of the acts or omissions of Developer, its agents or employees, or indemnitee, related to the construction of the permanent or temporary basins, the installation of Interim Measures and the Developer's Maintenance activities therefor. Developer further agrees to protect and hold the City, its officers and employees, harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, liability or loss of any sort, because of or arising out of acts or omissions of Developer, its agents or employees, or indemnitee, related to the construction of the permanent or temporary basins, the installation of Interim Measures and the Developer's Maintenance acti vi ties therefor. The approved 10 9. LI- improvement securities referred to above shall not cover the provisions of this paragraph. Such indemnification and agreement to hold harmless shall extend to damages to adjacent or downstream properties or the taking of property from owners of such adj acent or downstream properties as a resul t of Developer's construction and Maintenance activities as provided herein. It shall also extend to damages resulting from diversion of waters, change in the volume of flow, modification of the velocity of the water, erosion or sedimentation, or modification of the point of discharge or increase in flowrate as the result of the construction of the permanent or temporary basins, the installation of Interim Measures and the Developer's Maintenance activities therefor. The approval of Grading Plans and any related improvements shall not constitute the assumption by City of any responsibility for such damage or taking, nor shall City, by said approval, be an insurer or surety for the construction of the permanent or temporary basins, the installation of Interim Measures and the Developer's Maintenance activities therefor. The provisions of this Agreement shall become effective upon the execution of this Agreement and shall remain in full force and effect regardless of the City's acceptance or approval of the construction of the permanent and temporary basins, or the installation of Interim Measures. 11. Miscellaneous Provisions. 11.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and any and all other prior or contemporaneous oral or written agreements are hereby superseded. This Agreement may be amended, but only pursuant to a written amendment properly authorized and executed by both parties hereto. 11.2 Compliance with Laws. In the performance of its obligations under this agreement Developer shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, policies, permits and approvals. attached herein by 11.3 Recitals and Exhibits. All Recitals and Exhibits referred to herein are hereby incorporated this reference. 11. 4 for so long hereunder. Term. This agreement shall remain in effect as either party has executory obligations 11 c'"i-- .::: 11.5 Recording. The parties hereto shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the Official Records of the County of San Diego. 11.6 Assignment. The obligations of the Developer under this Agreement shall not be assigned in whole or in part, without the express written consent of the City. 11.7 Authority of Signatories. Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement, and that all resolutions and/or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this agreement. 11.8 Termination. Upon the termination of this Agreement pursuant to applicable provisions hereof, at the request of Developer or any successor in interest who owns any portion of the Project encumbered by this Agreement, the City shall execute an instrument prepared by Developer and approved by the City Attorney in recordable form which evidences the termination of this Agreement and confirms the release of the Project from the encumbrance of this Agreement. 11.9 Release of Individual Lots. Each lot or parcel encumbered by this Agreement may, in the City Manager's (or Manager's designee) discretion, be released from the encumbrance hereof upon the issuance of a building permit in conformance with the Tentative Map and/or Final Map with respect to such lot or parcel or upon the conveyance of any such lot or parcel to a homeowner or homeowners association. The City Manager (or Manager's designee) shall not withhold consent to such release so long as the City Manager (or Manager's designee) in good faith finds that the Developer is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement and that such partial release will not jeopardize the City's assurance that the obligations set forth in this Agreement will be performed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the close of an individual homeowner's escrow on any lot or parcel encumbered by this Agreement, or the conveyance of such lot or parcel to a homeowner's association, such lot or parcel shall be automatically released from the encumbrance hereof. In the event the City Manager (or Manager's designee) agrees to the Release, or escrow closes on any individual homeowner's lot or parcel or any homeowner's association lot or parcel, at the request of Developer or any successor in interest who owns any such lot or parcel, the City Manager (or Manager's designee) 12 9-/b shall execute an instrument drafted by Developer in a recordable form acceptable to the City Attorney which confirms the release of such lot or parcel from the encumbrance of this Agreement. 11.10. Unfulfilled Conditions. Developer hereby agrees, unless otherwise conditioned, that Developer shall comply with all unfulfilled tentative map conditions of approval and MMRP measures, established by Resolution No. 2000-068 and FSEIR 97-02 and shall remain in compliance with and implement the terms, conditions and provisions therein, including those conditions of approval and mitigation measures not listed in this Agreement but which are required to be fulfilled prior to issuance of a grading permit. [NEXT PAGE IS PAGE ONE OF TWO SIGNATURE PAGES] 13 .~ // C;I- / [SIGNATURE PAGE ONE OF TWO PAGES] SAN MIGUEL RANCH DETENTION BASIN MAINTENANCE, GRADING MITIGATION AND EROSION CONTROL AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. CITY OF CHULA VISTA Mayor Attest: City Clerk Approved as to Form: John M. Kaheny City Attorney 14 - ~ ~ ',!,'/ 7-/;r DEe 14 '00 04:23PM TRIMRRK P.2/3 \ \ \ [SIGNATURE PAGE TWO OF TWO PAGES] SAN MIGUEL RANCH DETENTION BASIN MAINTENANCE, GRADING ~1ITIGATION AND EROSION CONTROL AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be eXe~uted the day and year first hereinabove set forth. NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC, A DELEWARE L MITED I ILITY COMPANY, AS OWNER: BY: NAME: Stephen E. Hester TITLE:Vice President (ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED) 15 9-/1 DEe 14 '00 04:23PM TRIMRRK P.3/3 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT " '=-__=~-<c___a=__"",__'-"_~~_"" I ~~ I I ~~ ~ ~ ~. I~ lfi '~ I~I I. I. , . ~ State of California () y' Ov \^-?V On \~l 1'1.\li1J Dats ss. County of y' L ~ \JlLvtl I'lo-\-a r'l Tilli! of OfflC'&r (0;.8-, "JilnC Dep, Noeo>ry Public") V , before me, ...tV\..V"\" ~-hf.UI'-, ~" NOlmc(::) ofSign'l;r(l') ~rsonallY known to me n proved to me on the basis evidence Pl.!k1I.' personally appeared ., ~ (: ~ ~ I, I , I , ~~ I, fj:! <> 'e ~ I~j ~ !l1 ~ ~ 'I~ '~,', II I' ll~ ~~ ~ I~ (" ij ~ ~g l~ I~ ,~'I I~~ IQ g ~, ~,' y, I ~ ~ @ ~l:' Signer 15 Representing: ,,' ~ IQ ~.~~~k~~~~"€'4~t..~~.i;.~~... of satisfactory '''''.a... ,W"',~ -,:.01: :-" ~rt:l .. ... .- ~ ,..." " JEN"IFau. WARD' "',' f <' ~~: Ccmm~!on It 12177SS';c "" :li f1r;;>,<';'r NctoryPubITc-Corr~:. j; ~ ,'-'1'~' ,,' MYO;=J:~~'t;~;m i - - -~-"""""- - - -- ~ -,~.--:'.. . .1 to be the perso~ whose nameWof is/.....,- subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helM/II '''y executed the same in his/h..~I<Reir authorized capacit~, and that by hiS~ signature(~ the instrument the pef3on~, ,0: the entity upon behalf of which the person(~' acted, executed the instrument. I I I .1 I I I F'1.;l<::r.: Ndt;lryS"...IAb<:N<: '1 I .1 ESS my<hand an official seal. LU<v~ '/ 'ik,CA---J SiQ"slur8 or Notary Public OPTIONAL " Though the information be/ow is not raql.lired by law, it may prove valuabls to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and teaU8chmsnt of this form to another documsnt. I :'1 Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: .) Document Date: ~_".,.,. _.~_ Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Niilme: U Individual :J Corporate Officer - Title(s): :J Partner - 0 Limited 0 General U Attorney in Fact ~ Trustee [J Guardian or Conservator C Other: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Top of thumb here ~ I I I .1 ~ '. I;:l HI~~ fIlIIIIQflIl] fIlOl..ry As~CC1"lIon' 9JM Dc Sol" Av",., P.O. 80.0: 2~D2. CI'J9lSI'/(lrlh, CA Q131:1-~,.41;l2' www.llllllorllllnaloary.org Prcd.No.~07 Fkordor: CllIlToll-FI'll" '-8(Jl}.ij76-6027 ,r; ") 0 'f-.,t.. . List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit A-I Exhibit B Exhibit C '/-02/ Legal Description Project Plat Partial Conditions Approving Tentative Map Security Requirements EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Of Chula Vista Tract 99-04 San Miguel Ranch Parcel 1: That parcel of land in the County of San Diego, State of California, being portions of Sections 21,22,27 and 28, Township 17 South, Range 1 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to Official Plat thereof, included within the following described boundaries: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 22, as shown and delineated on Record of Survey Map NO.1 0018, filed April 18, 1985 as File/Page No 85-133648 in the Office of the County Recorder of said County of San Diego; thence along the Northerly line thereof, North 8916'02" East, 674.79 feet to the Northeast corner thereof; thence along the Easterly line thereof South 0049'46" West, 626.00 feet; thence South 4303'17" East, 115.32 feet; thence South 8656'21" East 2629.20 feet to a point on the Easterly line of said Section 22; thence along said Easterly line South 0224'36" West, 704.07 feet to a point on the Southerly line of that certain 200 foot wide easement granted to San Diego Gas and Electric Company in Exhibit B of Final Order of Condemnation recorded February 6, 1987 as File/Page No. 87-068825 of Official Records of said County of San Diego and the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along said Easterly line of said Section 22 South 0224'51" West to the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 27; thence along the Easterly line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter South 0026'26" West 1318.62 feet (record South 0026'19" West 1318.19 feet) to the Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 27; thence along the Southerly line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, North 8858'34" West 1328.80 feet (record North 8907'00" West 1328.60 feet) to the Westerly line of the East one-quarter of said Section 27; thence along said Westerly line, South 0015'24" West 2638.82 feet (record South 0007'00" West 2646.00 feet) to the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 27; thence along the Southerly line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, North 8853'17" West 607.09 feet (record North 8954'30" West 607 09 feet) to the Easterly corner of the land described under Parcel 3 in deed to Western Salt Company, recorded December 18, 1950 as File/Page No. 147375, in Book 3902, Page 47 of Official Records; thence along the Northeasterly line of said Western Salt Company's land, North 4758'36" West 444.50 feet (record North 4744'00" West 459.80 feet) and North 6746'17" West 416.80 feet (record North 6744'00" West 416.80 feet) to a point in the North and South center line of said Section 27, distant thereon South 0003'17" East 874.62 feet (record South 0001'00" East 874.80 feet) from the center of said Section 27; thence along said North and South center line, North 0003'17" West 874.62 feet (record North 0001'00" West 874.80 feet) to the center of said Section 27, thence along the East and West center lines of said Section 27, North 8857'43" West 2730.05 feet (record North 8857'50" West 2729.65 feet) to the Easterly line of said Section 28; thence along said Easterly line, North 0125'42" East 1230.75 feet (record North 0125'27" East 1227.60 feet) to the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, September 22, 1910; thence along the Northerly line of said Haley's Addition, North 8959'14" East 1332.78 feet (record 1330.30 feet) to the Northwesterly corner thereof; thence along the Westerly line of said Haley's Addition, South 0110'17" West 710 11 feet to an intersection with the center line of that certain road known as Proctor Valley Road, described in deed to the County of San Diego, recorded March 7,1903 in Book 310, Page 100 of Deeds and shown on Map of New Survey No. 172-B, on file in the Office of the County Surveyor; thence in a Southwesterly direction along the center line of said county road, South 7623'02" West, 5.96 feet to the beginning of a tangent 300.00 foot radius curve concave Southeasterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said 300.00 foot radius curve through a central angle of 2206'33" a distance of 115.76 feet; thence tangent to said curve, South 5416'29" East 145.39 feet to the beginning of a tangent 400 foot radius curve, concave 9JJ-.- of 120'12", a distance of 9.33 feet; thence North 0016'01" East 370.39 feet; thence North 4925'40" West 280.73 feet; thence South 4030'49" West (record South 4031'39" West) 1078.58 feet; thence South 7458'41" West 405.20 feet; thence North 6832'27" West 746.74 feet; thence North 5629'36" West 829.00 feet; thence North 0729'36" West 188.00 feet, thence North 4041 '36" West 698.00 feet; thence North 1751 '36" West (record North 1752'12" West) 1719.17 feet; thence North 0015'28" East 713.28 feet to the Northwest corner of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 21; thence along the Northerly line of said South Half, South 8949'26" East 2649.98 feet (record South 8948'49" East 2650.04 feet) to the Northeast corner of said South Half of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 21; thence North 0007'04" East 1319.19 (record North 0008'11" East 1319.39 feet) to the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 21; thence South 5037'15" East 2090.56 feet (record South 5036'56" East 2090A 1 feet); thence South 7203'52" East 575.50 feet (record South 7203'21" East 575.29 feet); thence South 4500'28" East 692.02 feet to the Westerly line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 22; thence alon9 said Westerly line South 011'08" East 330.98 feet; thence North 8908'36" East 667.61 feet; thence South 003'03" East 331.01 feet to the Southerly line of said Southwest Quarter of Section 22; thence along said Southerly line, North 8905'34" East 666.01 feet (record North 8907'31" East) 666.05 feet; thence North 019'48" East 660.97 feet (record North 0019'46" East 661.00 feet) to a point on the Southerly line of the above-referenced 200 foot wide easement to San Diego Gas and Electric which bears North 8656'30" West (record North 8656'21" West) from the True Point of Beginning, thence South 8656'30" East to the True Point of Beginning. Excepting therefrom all crude oil, petroleum, gas, brea, asphaltum, minerals and other hydrocarbon substances lying below a depth of 500 feet from the surface of said land, but without the right of surface entry. 9-)..) - . <C I- - m - :z:: >< w o < 15fi g~ [, " " '" W rh o -, 1----, ~,rj")\ 8'~7/L~!;I';~ ~<~~~Ill}h\ ~>" 'x",ri)?!\'<1~'7; ~'-_ -'-J'f' .. <,>, ILt!-:~v,Y(rtll7rj!:;>, 0-~;:~~-s,'V" -I c :7'(:-)~,_,\,""",'Y~'>'",_ _ _ ~!k!':!y( ':'~'<i:~-;j"W&J(~-:'- .- ];'}-11- 7;:; 0V /\\ \C:::j(Nf1'~10r/ 'I" Cl \ '- <:'2::YQ/ I ')1 <.) 11 ~ !/--'-:'-a:\,~Z!;~~[~iR'fi: . S--- ...;"J Z '!I~J<-Y t. iF/~f::.' ;:'~"':'''~-;~~>~'''/0' '.0. Y i -"'I/--/. , ! , I fl'!; !5:l6~"",,) /),,1.:;' Ul !i Jc.--'.Vl--.,~...~", ~"). ., 1_~ 1- I 1 ", L(iJf'1 {7 iI, . co ' v" /:/ hili ,'Jf:i'^fv ':(;>::8:/-.;' :.-....:!!":j.IjJ...I......:I(..~_t "'.~"'\}>:<.r'S\0t;.nr\y -" ;I.:; "''''''7 / ._ ". .;,. Jl'-/~'\("/J , ,I , ~(/F;]r-C:: \\:m. _.1 1, rg <~ ~ ! 1\ xtllL\ 0 'i.11. \ III C\\(\. '7 \"1 . ..... \-\"7 rg \;J h.1 ~,,__L : . "" ,> <( [ :1lJ /\ en I \<c z I :2\~ '" rh 0, i. )' 1:0 < o ,oc , ~ ~ ~ ..... " S .125 -"'~ \ --, . " t~~ \. \ ..I~ '.,' III'. \ / ~<"~;-:Tdl';""J{~\~-m. <.!.."://I /;z '" ~~ ..-~, , I-J 1- ,V" " 0 , , . ~)' "... !'(""'l-1"-''' ,> / '/ " \', ):,\ \->-)'-':'}:I..!fi-i~%.' !<~$I/(I /' _ ~ /);(;:.; :Yl:f:~;));'lf:i. I~:~'~ )<,>, . ,. / ,\ 'If/I - i'..,....,~ '''p,..""Z:/~.., ; 1 ... .'. -. -~~\ \"'4 /~_.~_ -=-. / A(\ ':/::~c'.f$-/.,>:.<y / / '" .(r..---....:(,-<\.'j;::)0\("->!-v 1 "'_"I I .":- 1 /. t~tn::QiLU~~m..~(W:c-:J~(~U-l [:J~ ,Ll/ -_Jc.I "--<1:...J!.____ - .-," :<?~{ \'['~{-'-JO',! "~"I ....1;, ~~i f'Cm!]] 11 -'v , , ,\1.. y /; _,' _ :J \ \ \~&-t~\:~:_..\~ '/L.j~m\\>~~/ I ij\ \ "'-58--\ \_.." , y/ .....( l 1\ \ '-'1 i-W I )r,.,.J; \;, -::\\\\\"-';="~:J"".uJ.! i L\ ~_ -d\' Ji '\ ~-T''k.!rt'-6:'-:...;\ -ILl ~':~--l' ".11'~jJL.-'1' \ .'- :"'~"L:::,\\ I\' <1 fl. Q?' '\\}"">LO/ --.- r--::\, \ ')r-J . \' \;.--' '--_~_____~ .- ,..- 'I, lj... '''''>.._",,'0 ---:':j \-=",'~ \ \ \._~-:;::_'-~~C€f ~:"-'/-4_.' "\ )' \ \ ___." .-....~6~ ':...'''. ;;_'~OIJ' ~ ~ ~ zV~ io ..... a) o 00 ..... "'~:! ~"5 ~~1! ~!:: ~~: ro ro II!(/)~ ~ -;;::. .---:;::.-- -/ '--- ') - ~ Li-- \_ 1,- EXHIBIT "B" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NOS.: 8, 15, 63, 67, 73, 90e AND 179 OF CHULA VISTA TRACT 99-04 8. If developer desires to do certain work on the property after approval of the tentative map but prior to recordation of the applicable final map, they may do so by obtaining the required approvals and permits from the City. The permits can be approved or denied by the City in accordance with the City's Municipal Code, regulations and policies. Said permits do not constitute a guarantee that subsequent submittals (i.e., final maps and improvement plans) will be approved. All work performed by the developer prior to approval of the applicable final Map shall be at Developer's own risk. Prior to permit issuance, the Developer shall acknowledge in writing that subsequent submittals (i.e., final Map and improvement plans) may require extensive changes, at Developers cost, to work done under such early permit. Prior to the issuance of a permit, the Developer shall post a bond or other security acceptable to the City in an amount determined by the City to guarantee the rehabilitation of the land if the applicable final Map does not record. 15. Prior to approval of each final Map, the Applicant shall enter into a supplemental subdivision agreement to implement, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building, all applicable mitigation measures identified in FSEIR 97-02, the CEQA Findings of Fact and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the San Miguel Ranch Project in accordance with the requirements, provisions and schedules contained therein, and as further specified in these Tentative Map conditions. Modification of the sequence of mitigation shall be at the discretion of the Director of Planning and Building should changes in circumstances warrant such a revision. 63. Prior to approval of each final Map, demonstrate the adequacy of existing detention facilities or construct runoff detention facilities upon the request of the City Engineer, to assure that the maximum allowable discharges after development do not exceed pre-development discharges, all to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer shall provide for the future maintenance of the detention basin facilities through the establishment of a landscaping maintenance district, or other mechanism as approved by the City. ~, ) ,- -;1- -<~. 67. The developer shall comply with all the provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and the Clean Water Program during and after all phases of the development process, including but not limited to: mass grading, rough grading, construction of street and landscaping improvements, and construction of dwelling units. 73. Enter into an agreement with the City wherein the City is held harmless from any liability from erosion, siltation or increase in flow of drainage resulting from this project. 90e. Enter into a supplemental agreement with the City, prior to approval of each Final Map, where the developer agrees to the following: Hold the City harmless from any liability for erosion, siltation or increase flow of drainage resulting from this project 179. Comply with all applicable regulations established by the Uni ted States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) as set forth in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (N.P.D.E.S.) permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge and any regulations adopted by the City of Chula Vista pursuant to the N.P.D.E.S. regulations or requirements. Further, the applicant shall file notice of intent with the State Water Resources Control Board to obtain coverage under the N.P.D.E.S. General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity and shall implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) concurrent with the commencement of grading activities. The SWPPP shall include both construction and post construction pollution prevention and pollution control measures and shall identify funding mechanisms for post construction control measures. 9-",2(;, EXHIBIT "e" SECURITY REQUIREMENTS 1. (Paragraph 7.1 of the agreement) *Cash deposit in the prior to issuance a Project. amount of the first $50,000 Grading to be submitted Permit for the 2. (Paragraph 7.2 of the agreement) *Performance Bond (series of one year terms) in the amount of $100,000 to be submitted prior to issuance the first Grading Permit for the Project. C:\Agreements\San Miguel Basin Maintenance-final.doc 9-)7 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /~ Meeting Date 12/19/00 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving waiver of the lien plus indebtedness to valuation ratio portion of Council Policy 505-03, approving the Deferral and Lien Agreement, and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Lien and Deferral Agreement for 48 Walnut Drive SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works (~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~f~ ~>~ (4/$ths Vote: Yes __ No~ Property owners Marlo and Socorro Zugasti have requested a deferral for the installation of public improvements along their property at 48 Walnut Drive in Chula Vista in the form of a lien deferral agreement. Council Policy 505-03 requires property owners to meet a certain limit of indebtedness to property value ratio in order to obtain deferrals in the form of lien deferral agreements. Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti do not meet these limits and have requested Council to approve a deviation to said policy to enable them to obtain a lien deferral agreement. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the subject resolution approving waiver of the lien plus indebtedness to valuation ratio portion of Council Policy 505-03, approving the Deferral and Lien Agreement, and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Lien and Deferral Agreement for 48 Walnut Drive. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: No Board or Commission actions are required in this case. DISCUSSION: On June 18, 1999, Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti submitted a request for a building permit to construct a remodel consisting of a two-story addition to their current residence at 48 Walnut Drive in Chula Vista. This remodel includes adding four bedrooms, a living room and two bathrooms. In accordance with Section 12.24.070 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, property owners wishing to construct on their property must provide for the installation of missing street improvements along their property if the valuation of the proposed work is in excess of $20,000. Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti's building permit valuation is $148,105 and there are missing street improvements along their 225 foot property frontage on Walnut Drive. Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti were informed that the City could not approve their building permit until they either guaranteed the installation of the missing street improvements or applied for and received approval of a deferral of said improvements. On February 25, 2000, Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti submitted an application for a deferral of the missing street improvements which include street widening and installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk along 48 Walnut Drive (PD-206). On March 31, 2000, the City Engineer approved the deferral Page 2, Item Meeting Date 12/19/00 request. The deferral was approved because it would not be practical to install the mid-block missing improvements at this time. It was determined that it would be more desirable to install the missing improvements as an overall project encompassing the entire block rather than a piecemeal fashion beginning at 48 Walnut Drive. Staff estimated the amount of the improvements to be deferred to be $23,700. Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti then requested that the deferral be in the form of a lien deferral agreement. Council Policy 505-03 allows staffto approve lien deferral agreements up to an amount of $30,000 as long as the property owner has demonstrated financial hardship and provided evidence that the total of the lien, plus all indebtedness against the property does not exceed 80% of the value of the single family residence. Staff determined that it was not reasonable to require Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti to submit a cash bond in the amount of $23,700 and therefore agreed to consider a lien in this amount instead. After submittal of an appraisal and title report, staff discovered that the lien plus indebtedness to valuation ratio for the Zugasti's property was 99%. This exceeds the maximum ratio allowed by Policy 505-03 of 80% by 19%. In this case, the indebtedness to valuation ratio without including the lien amount would still exceed the maximum allowed per Policy 505-03. The Zugasti's property lies within the Woodlawn Park Community located in the Montgomery area north of Main Street. Infrastructure problems within Woodlawn Park are pervasive throughout the area. Most, if not all of the streets in the area are substandard and consist of mostly narrow strips of pavement. The pavement widths vary from 18 to 32 feet and only a few areas have curb, gutter and sidewalk. Over the years, prior to annexation to Chula Vista, many homes and other private improvements have been built across property lines and in some cases into the existing street easements. Despite the unresolved infrastructure problems, property owners such as the Zugasti's are still moving forward to uplift the condition of the neighborhood through improvements to individual residences. Within the vicinity of the subject property, the following deferrals have been approved (also refer to Exhibit "A"): FILE ADDRESS A.P.N. NO. DATE AMOUNT& TYPE FRONTAGE PD026 72 Walnut Dr 624-020-89 1/8/88 $8,120, Cash 147 FT PD065 26 Walnut Dr 624-020-44 1/8/90 $4,362, Lien 120 FT PD121 54 Walnut Dr 624-020-39 3/8/93 $13,728, Lien 152 FT PD198 24 Walnut Dr 624-020-42 7/18/96 $14,200, Lien 81 FT The Zugasti's property frontage along Walnut Drive is unusually long at 225 feet. As a result, the deferral amount of $23,700 is also unusually high. Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti will not be able to make these improvements to their residence if the City adhered strictly to its valuation ratio policy. Staff believes that this is an area of the City where the citizens should be encouraged to upgrade their properties. Page 3, Item /~ Meeting Date 12/19/00 Street improvements would probably be installed in the future through an Assessment District project involving an entire block. If Council approves the subject Lien Deferral Agreement, staff will require an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti for future right-of-way along their property frontage. This will insure that there is adequate right-of-way for any future street widening work along the subject property. Therefore, staffrecommends waiving the lien plus indebtedness to valuation ratio portion of Policy 505-03 and allow Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti to obtain a Lien Deferral Agreement and construct their home improvements since their property has extensive frontage and because the City will receive an irrevocable Offer of Dedication for future street improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no direct costs to the City associated with this project, except for the processing of the deferral agreement. A fee in the amount of $250 was collected from the applicant to cover the agreement processing. Attachments: Exhibit "A"; Vicinity map Exhibit "B' Copy of Lien and Deferral agreement File No, 0710-40-PE-448 H:\HOME\ENGINEER~AGENDA\PD206_SLY doc 12/14/00 9:33:53 AM Recording requested by and please return to: City Clerk City of Chula Vista P.O. Box 1087 Chula Vista, CA 91912 · This spaceforRecorder's use, only · Assessors Parcel No: 624-020-40 0740-20-PD-206 AGREEMENT FOR THE DEFERRAL OF THE INSTALLATION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND LIEN SECURING THE FUTURE INSTALLATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY MANO ZUGASTI, SOCORRO ZUGASTI AND MARIO E. ZUGASTI AND LOCATED AT 48 WALNUT DRIVE IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 20 , by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), and MARLO ZUGASTI WHO ACQUIRED TITLE AS MANO ZUGASTI AND SOCORRO ZUGASTI, as husband and wife, AND MARLO E. ZUGASTI, as a single man, all as joint tenant, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Property Owner"); WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the property which is the subject matter of this agreement is commonly known as 48 WALNUT DRIVE CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, is identified in the County Assessor records as Parcel No. 624-020-40 in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California and is further described as: BEING LOT 13 OF WOODLAWN PARK, IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO 1271, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 30, 1910. (hereinafter "Property"); and, WHEREAS, Property is owned by Property Owner; and, WHEREAS, Property Owner is desirous of making improvements upon Property, hereinafter referred to as "Building", and, WHEREAS, Section 12.24.040 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code provides, generally, for the installation of certain public improvements upon any dedicated alley, street or streets adjacent to a lot or parcel upon which a structure or building is to be installed, erected, or moved upon; and, WHEREAS, Property Owner is obligated ("Improvement Duty"), by the above described authority to install certain public street improvements Chnprovements"), on the street right of way abutting the Property to the specifications set by, and designed, surveyed, staked and installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, described as follows: 209LF concrete curb and gutter, 941SF sidewalk, 10LF a.c. berm, 220LF remove existing berm, 225LF sawcut existing a.c., one residential driveway, and asphaltic concrete paving and base for street widening of approximately 8 feet. WHEREAS, Property Owner has applied to the City Engineer of the City for a deferral of the Improvement Duty; and, WHEREAS, Section 12.24.070 provides that if the City Engineer, in his discretion, feels that said installation of Improvements would cause a defective condition to the property or it would be extremely impractical to install or construct the same, then the City Engineer, upon finding that grounds for said deferral of the requirements of Section 12.24.040, may grant said deferral, which may be limited to a specified period of time; and, WHEREAS, the City Engineer does hereby find that the grounds for said request for a deferral of the Improvement Duty exist on the conditions set forth in this Agreement, and the granting of said deferral is in conformance with the requirements of Section 12.24.070; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows: A. Grant of Deferral: City Engineer hereby grants a deferral of the Improvement Duty until 30 days after such time in the future that the City Engineer may submit a written demand upon the Property Owner or successors in interest to perform the Improvement Duty, but in no event for a period of time later than three (3) years from the date of execution of this agreement. B. Agreement to Perform Improvement Du _ty: Property Owner, or successors in interest, in lieu of installing the Improvements specified herein prior to final inspection or the giving of a Certificate of Occupancy by the City, agrees, covenants and promises that Property Owner will perform the Improvement Duty within thirty (30) days of written notice from the City Engineer to install said improvements, or within three (3) years from the date of execution of this agreement, whichever occurs first, unless an extension is granted by the City Engineer. Pa~e (2) / C. Agreement Runs with the Land: The burden of this covenant is for the benefit of the land owned by the City adjacent to the Property. The burden of this covenant touches and concerns the Property. It is the intent of the parties, and the parties agree, that this covenant shall be binding upon both the current Property Owner, and upon the successors, heir, transferees and assigns of the Property Owner, and run with, the ownership of the land which it burdens. D. Grant of Lien: For the purpose of securing the faithful performance of the promises and covenants herein contained, Property Owner hereby grants to the City of Chula Vista a lien ("Lien") upon the Property in an amount equal toTwenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($23,700.00) based upon the current Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index Value of 6265.63 (Week of November 20, 2000) as published weekly by the McGraw-Hill weekly periodical, Engineering News Record ("Index") and which amount shall be increased or decreased monthly in direct proportion to the increase or decrease in the Index between the month in which the City forecloses upon said lien, and the month in which this agreement was entered ("Lien Amount"). 1. At any time during the period herein provided, Property Owner, may make a cash deposit and enter into a Lien Removal and Deferral Agreement with the City in the then current Lien Amount to cover the total cost of the improvements in order to remove the Lien from the Property. The Lien Removal and Deferral Agreement shall not constitute a rescission of other covenants and property interests herein granted, and shall not constitute a basis for not recording this Agreement. 2. In the event that said Index is no longer published, the City shall have the right, upon notice to Property Owner, to calculate the Lien Amount on the basis of any index which it reasonably determines reflects the cost of living increases or decreases in the San Diego County area between the date of this agreement and the date of foreclosure on the lien. 3. The Lien Amount shall operate as a maximum amount of the principal of this Lien, exclusive of Attorney's Fees and Costs, and interest from the date of filing of the foreclosure action on the Lien, which interest Property Owner agrees to pay at the rate of ten (10%) percent per annum, compounded annually. E. Grant of Conditional Easement: Property Owner hereby grants to City a conditional easement over fire Property to permit entry upon, design, survey, staking and'constmction upon, and maintenance of, the Improvements which easement shall be conditional upon the refusal or failure of the Property Owner, including Property Owner's successors, to perform the Improvement DutY as herein required. F. Remedies: Nothing in this agreement shall constitute a limitation on the remedies provided at law or equity. It is understood, agreed and acknowledged by Property Owner that, upon failure of the Property Owner to perform the hnprovement Duty at the time and in the manner specified by this Agreement, the City may, but is not required to, do any of the following: Page ( 3 ) 1. Install or construct said improvements by contract or otherwise, and permission is hereby granted to the City or its contractors and contractor's employees to enter upon any portion or portions of said property reasonably necessary for said construction, and the entire cost and expense of said improvements shall be charged against said property and said cost and expense shall be payable by Property Owner, his/her successors, heirs, assigns or transferees, immediately upon completion of said improvements, and in the event the same is not paid within thirty (30) days, the City may foreclose on said lien, as provided by law for the foreclosure of mortgages, and Property Owner agrees that the amount of said lien includes attorneys' fees which shall be taxed as a cost in any suit or foreclosure. G. Direct the City Engineer to estimate the cost of the work required to complete said improvements, and foreclose said lien in said amount. 1. Foreclose said lien as a mortgage. 2. Pursue any other remedy, legal or equitable by law, for the foreclosure of a lien, and Property Owner, his/her successors, heirs and assigns, shall pay reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to be taxed as a cost in said proceedings. H. Covenant to Cooperate in Improvement Petition: It is further understood and agreed that Property Owner and/or his/her heirs, assignees or successors in interest shall not protest any proceeding authorized under that chapter of Streets and Highways Code, commencing at § 5000, et al. C 1911 Act Proceeding"), or that chapter of said Code, commencing at § 7000, et al. (" 1913 Act Proceeding") to provide improvements that include any of the works of improvements for which Property Owner is obligated as an Improvement Duty under this Agreement. I. Miscellaneous Provisions: 1. Authority of City: Property Owner further agrees that, and agrees not to protest the fact, that the City is vested with the authority to require the Property Owner to perform the Improvement Duty forthwith. 2. Notices: Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement or by law, any and all notices required or permitted by this Agreement or by law to be served on or delivered to either party shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly served, delivered, and received when personally delivered to the party to whom it is directed, or in lieu thereof, when three (3) business days have elapsed following deposit in the U.S. mail, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, first-class postage prepaid, addressed to the address indicated in this Agreement. A party may change such address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party. Facsimile transmission shall constitute personal delivery. Page (4) Ci _ty: City of Chula Vista 276 4th Ave. Chula Vista, CA 92010 Attn: Public Works, Engineering Division Property Owner: Mano Zugasti, Socorro Zugasti & Mario Zugasti 48 Walnut Drive Chula Vista, CA 91911 (A party may change such address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this paragraph. Facsimile transmission shall constitute personal delivery.) 3. Captions: Captions in this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference and do not define, describe or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any of its terms. 4. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof. Any prior oral or written representations, agreements, understandings, and/or statements shall be of no force and effect. 5. Preparation of Agreement: No inference, assumption or presumption shall be drawn from the fact that a party or his attorney prepared and/or drafted this Agreement. It shall be conclusively presumed that both parties participated equally in the preparation and/or drafting this Agreement. 6. Recitals: Exhibits: Any recitals set forth above are incorporated by reference into this Agreement. End of Page. Next Page is a Signature Page for PD-206 P age ( 5 ) SIGNATURE PAGE FOR DEFERRAL AND LIEN AGREEMENT PD-206 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. CITY OF CHULA VISTA BY: DATED: CLIFFORD L. SWANSON, DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER (City Clerk to attach acknowledgment.) OWNERS DATED: MARIO ZUGASTI DATED: SOCORRO ZUGASTI DATED: MARIO E. ZUGASTI (Property Owner(s) to attach notary acknowledgment.) NOTES: a. Each owner as reflected on the preliminary title report must sign. Approved as to form: JOHN M. KAHENY CITY ATTORNEY [H:\HOME\ENGINEER\PERMITS\PD206C.BFS] Pa~e ( 6 ) / ,,' RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING WAIVER OF THE LIEN PLUS INDEBTEDNESS TO VALUATION RATIO PORTION OF COUNCIL POLICY 505-03, APPROVING THE DEFERRAL AND LIEN AGREEMENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE THE LIEN AND DEFERRAL AGREEMENT FOR 48 WALNUT DRIVE WHEREAS, Property owners, Mario and Socorro Zugasti, have requested a deferral for the installation of public improvements along their property at 48 Walnut Drive in Chula vista in the form of a lien deferral agreement; and WHEREAS, Council Policy 505-03 requires property owners to meet a certain limit of indebtedness to property value ratio in order to obtain deferrals in the form of lien deferral agreements; and WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Zugasti do not meet these limits and have requested Council to approve a waiver of the application of said policy to enable them to obtain a lien deferral agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby waive the lien plus indebtedness to valuation ratio portion of Council Policy 505-03. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve an Agreement for the Deferral of the Installation of certain Public Improvements in the city of Chula vista and Lien Securing the Future Installation of said Improvements on the Property Owned by Mano zugasti, Socorro Zugasti and Mario E. Zugasti and Located at 48 Walnut Drive in the City of Chula Vista, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Lien and Deferral Agreement for 48 Walnut Drive. Presented by Approved as to form by ~ G-!l7~~~ Job: .L.Kaheny City Attorney John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works [H:\HOME\ATTORNEYIRESOI Deferral 48 Walnut (December12,2000{1:50pm)] COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Meeting Date 12/19/00 ITEM TITLE: A) Resolution Approving Final Map of Chula Vista Tract No. 99-03, Eastlake Trails North Neighborhoods TN- 1 and TN- 2, accepting on behalf of the City of Chula Vista the various public streets and easements, all as granted on said map within said subdi¥ision, and approving the Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the completion of improvements required by said subdivision and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement. B) Resolution Approving Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Chula Vista Tract No.99-03, Eastlake Trails North Neighborhoods TN-1 and TN-2 requiring The Eastlake Company to comply with certain unfulfilled conditions of Resolution ! 9447 and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager ..~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X ) On May 4, 1999, by Resolution 19447, Council conditionally approved the Tentative Subdivision Map for Chula Vista Tract No. 99-03, Eastlake Trails (see Exhibit 1). The Final Map, Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Eastlake Trails North Neighborhoods TN-1 and TN-2 (total of 73 single family residences ~ are now before Council for consideration and approval. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolutions: (A) approvtng the Final Map, and Subdivision Improvement Agreement; and (B) approving the Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Eastlake Trails North Neighborhoods TN-1 and TN-2. BOARD/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: Not Applicable DISCUSSION: The project site is irregular in shape and represents a portion of the northwestern area of the EastLake Trails subdivision (see Exhibit 2). The subdivision consists of 73 single family residential lots on 26.083 acres, as follows: Number of Total Number of Number of Lots for Residential Lots Streets Total Acreage Lots Open Space 77 73(14.3997) 4(4.3741) (7.3093) 26.083 Page 2, Item Meeting Date 12/19/00 The final map has been reviewed by the Department of Public Works and found to be in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Map. Approval of the map constitutes acceptance by the City of all easements within the subdivision. Satisfied Conditions and Agreements The Developer has already satisfied the applicable conditions of approval of Resolution 19447 through the design, grading and improvement plans, the bonding of work, the payment of all applicable fees, granting of easements, and by entering into the proposed Supplemental Subdivision improvement Agreement (SSIA) and Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA). The Developer has already executed the SSIA in order to satisfy the following conditions of approval for Resolution 19447 Tentative Map Conditions Nos. 9, 16, l 7, 18, 31, 36, 39, 46, 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 69, 73, 74, 78, 79, 80, 83, 86, 87c, 89, 100,103,106, 108, 111, 114, 115, 116, 118, 121,123, 124, and 126. The Developer has also executed a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) and has provided bonds to guarantee the installation of surveying monuments. The Engineering Division, at the request of the developer, has previously issued a construction permit for all the onsite facilities (i.e. street, sewer, drainage, etc) serving the proposed subdivision. FISCAL IMPACT: None to the General Fund. Developer deposits wilt cover all staff costs associated with processing subject final map and agreements. Exhibits: 1) Resolution 19447 (Tentative Map Conditions) 2) TN-1 and TN-2, Vicinity Map 3) Developer's Disclosure Statement H:\HOME\ENGINEER\LANDDEV\Trails North\CASFMTn12 B1 my.doc File TN-012F/R. Yano EXHIBIT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 19447 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SECOND ADDENDUM TO FSEIR 97-04 (EASTLAKE TRAILS/GREENS RE-PLANNING PROGRAM), INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT AND ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS OF THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR EASTLAKE TRAILS, CHULA VISTA TRACT 99-03. 1. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject matter of this resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A-I through A-5, copies of which are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, incorporated herein by this reference, and commonly known as EastlakeTrails Tentative Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 99-03; and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 322.8 gross acres located on the east side of Hunte Parkway between Otay Lakes Road and the future alignment of Olympic Parkway, within the Eastlake Planned Community ("Project Site"); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on October 8, 1998, The Eastlake Company ("Developer") filed a tentative subdivision map application with the Planning and Building Department of the City of Chula Vista requesting approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for Eastlake Trails, Chula Vista Tract 99-03 in order to subdivide the Project Site into seven hundred forty nine (749) residential tots; four super lots with capacity for 394 dwelling units; three (3) open space lots (OS-1 through OS-3), three (3) park lots (P-1 through P-3), school site (S-1); community purpose facility site (CPF); and various special lots (i.e. slope lots) throughout the subdivision ("Project"); and C. Prior Discretionary Approva!s WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various entitlements and agreements, including: 1 ) a General Development Plan, Eastlake II (Eastlake I Expansion) General Development Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15198 CGDP") and amended by City Council Resolution No. 19275 on November 24, 1998; 2) the Eastlake Trails Sectional Planning Area Plan ("SPA"); 3) Eastlake Trails Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP); 4) Eastlake Trails Water Conservation Plan (WCP); 5) Eastlake Trails Planned Community District Regulations; 6) Eastlake Trails Design Guidelines; 7) Eastlake Trails Public Facilities Financing Plan; and 8) Eastlake Comprehensive Affordable Housing Program, all previously approved by City Council Resolution No.19275, and Ordinance 2765 on November 24, 1998; 8) Eastlake III Development Agreement, approved on February 27, 1999; and 9) Eastlake Park Agreement, approved on August 8, 1998; 10) Escrow Agreement, approved on March 26, 1996; and D. Planning Commission Record on Application Resolution 19447 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on April 28, 1999 and, after hearing staff presentation and public testimony, voted ( ~ ) recommend that the City Council approve the Project, in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions listed below. E. City Council Record of Applications WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on M~y 4, 1999, on the Project and to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same; and WHEREAS, the city clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said tentative subdivision map application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 ft. of the exterior boundary of the project at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m. May 4, 1999, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on the Project held on April 28, 1999, and the minutes and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. III. PREVIOUS EIR~97-04 REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED; FINDINGS; APPROVALS The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has previously reviewed, analyzed, considered, and certified FSEIR-97-04 (Eastlake Trails / Greens Replanning Program). IV. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that any impacts associated with the proposed tentative subdivision map have been previously addressed by F~EIR 97-04 (Eastlake Trails/Greens Re-planning Program) and has, therefore, prepared an addendum to said EIR. Refined info~mation available since completion of the EIR regarding the potential environmental impacts of the project does not show that the project will have one or more significant impacts which were not previously addressed in the Final EIR.The Addendum has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, State EIR Guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista. V. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL Resolution 19447 Page 3 The City Council finds that Addendum to FSEIR-97-04 reflects the independent judgment of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista and hereby adopts the Addendum to FSEIR 97-04 (Eastlake Trails/Greens Replanning Program). VI. TENTATIVE SUBDIVlSI©N MAP FINDINGS A. Pursuant to Govern~nent Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map as conditioned herein for Eastlake Trails, Chula Vista Tract No. 99-03 ia in conformance with the elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following: a. Land Use The Eastlake Trails Sectional Flanning Area (SPA) plan provides for Low (0-3 du/ac), Low Medium (3-6 alu/ac), and Medium (6-11 du/ac) residential densities, as well as Parks (P), Open Space (OS), Public Quasi-public support (PQ) land uses for 1143 dwelling units (5.1 du/ac.). The proposed subdivision incorporates a variety of lot sizes within the density range allowed by the SPA and other lots to satisfy the park dedication and Community Purpose Facilities (CPF) requirements. Thus, the Project as conditioned, is in substantial compliance with the Eastlake II GDP and Eastlaka Trails SPA. b. Circulation All on-site and off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision will be constructed or DIF fees paid by the developer Jn accordance with the Eastlake Trails Public Facilities Financing Plan. The public streets within the Project will be designed per City design standards and/or requirements. The westerly adioining street system was designed to handle the anticipated flow of traffic from this and other area projects. The required and anticipated off-site improvements would be designed to handle this Project and future projects in the area. c. Housinq The Eastlake Comprehensive Affordable Housin9 Program has been adopted and incorporated into the Eastlake Trails SPA Plan to ensure that a minimum of ten percent affordable housing is provided. In addition, a mix of housing types and lot sizes for single-family, townhouses, condominium and various apartment densities will also be provided for persons of various incomes. d. Conservation The Environmental Impact Report FSEIR-97-04 and Addendum addressed the goals and policies of the ConservaTion Element of The General Plan and found the development of this site to be consistent with these goals and policies. Resolution 19447 Page 4 e. Parks and Recreation, Open Space The Easdake Trails Tentative Subdivision Map provides a community park, community center, private swim complex and regional as well as community trails consistent with the General Plan, Eastlake II General Development plan and Eastlake Trails goals and objectives, f. Seismic Safety The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the goaJs and policies of the Seismic Element of the General Plan for this site. g. Safety The Fire Department and other emergency service agencies have reviewed the proposed subdivision for conformance with City safety policies and have determined that the proposal meets the City Threshold Standards for emergency services. h. Noise Noise mitigation measures included in the Environmental Impact Report FSEIR- 97-04 and Addendum adequately address the noise policy of the General Plan. The project has been conditioned to require that all dwelling units be designed to preclude interior noise levels over 45 dBA and exterior noise exposure over 65 dBA for all outside private patio areas. i. Scenic Highway The project site is located adjacent to designated scenic highways (Olympic Parkway and Otay Lakes Road). An average 75-foot wide landscaped open space buffer and a decorative wall will be provided along these two edges and extended along Hunte Parkway. j. ~Bicycle Routes Bicycle lanes have been incorporated within the Eastlake Trails design and will be connected to the existing Eastlake Greens SPA bicycle lane system. In addition, the public streets within the project are of adequate width to accommodate bicycle travel within the interior of the subdivision. k. Public Buildinqs No public buildings are proposed on the project site. The project is subject to RCT fees prior to issuance of building permits. B. Pursuant to Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Council certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources. Resolution 19447 Page 5 C. The configuration, orientation and topography of the site partially allows for the optimum setting of lots for passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities as required by Government Code Section 66473.1. D. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal conforms to all standards established by the City for such projects. E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained is approximately pro'portional both in nature and extent to the impact created by the proposed development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEE~ that the City Council does hereby approve the Project subject to the general and specii~l conditions set forth below. VII. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. Proiect Site is Improved with Proiect Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site with the Project as described in Tentative Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 99-03 and FSEIR-97-04 and Addendum, except as modified by this Resolution. B. Implement Mitigation Measures Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of all mitigation measures pertaining to the Project identified in the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Eastlake Trails, FSEIR-97-04 and Addendum. Any such measures not satisfied by a specific condition of this Resolution or by the project design shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. Mitigation Measures shall be monitored via the Mitigation Monitoring Program approved in conjunction with the FSEIR and Addendum. Modification of the sequence of mitigation shall be at the discretion of the Director of Planning and Building should changes in the circumstances warrant such revision. C. Implement previously adopted conditions of approval pertinent to project Unless otherwise conditioned, comply, remain in compliance and implement, the terms, conditions and provisions, as are applicable to the property which is the subject matter of this Tentative Map, of: 1) The Eastlake I1 General Development Plan (GDP); 2) Eastlake Trails Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan; 3) Eastlake Trails Planned Community District Regulations; 4) Eastlake Trails Design Guidelines; 5) Eastlake Trails Public Facilities Financing Plan; 6) Eastlake Trails Water Conservation Plan; 7) Eastlake Trails Air Quality Improvement Plan; 8) Eastlake Trails Sub-area Water Master Plan; and 9) Eastlake Trails Waste Water Master Plan, all approved by the Council on November 24, 1999, Resolution No. 19275 ("Plans"), prior to approval of the corresponding Final Map. As an alternative, the Developer shall entered into an agreement with the City, providing the City with such security (including recordation of covenants running with the land) and implementation procedures as the City may require. Aisc assuring that, after approval of the Final Map, the developer will continue to comply, remain in compliance, and implement such Plans. The Developer shall also agree to waive any claim that the adoption Resolution 19447 Page 6 of a final Water Conservation Plan or Air Quality Plan constitutes an improper subsequent imposition of the condition. D. Implement Public Facilities Financing Plan Developer shall install public facilities in accordance with the Eastlake Trails Public Facilities Financing Plan as amended or aS required by the City Engineer to meet threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista. The City Engineer and Planning and Building Director may, at their discretion, modif,~ the ¢equence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision. E. Design Approval The Developer shall develop the lots in accordance with the Eastlake Trails Planned Community District Regulations and Design Guidelines and all single family lots less than 5,000 sq, ft shall be submitted for review and approval under the City's Design Review process prior to submittal for building permits. VIII. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The following conditions of approval are based on two Final Maps or development phases, which are hereinafter referred to as "Initial Phase" and the "Remaining Phase." Unless otherwise specified, all conditions and code requirements listed below shall be fully completed to the City's satisfaction prior to approval of the Initial Phase First Final Map. STREETS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 1. Provide security in accordance with Chapter 18.16 of the Municipal Code and dedicate, and construct full street improvements for all public streets shown on the Tentative Map within the subdivision boundary or off-site, as required for each phase in accordance with Chula Vista Design Standards, Chula Vista Street Standards, and the Chula Vista Subdivision Manual, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Said improvements shall include, but not be limited to, asphalt concrete pavement, base, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk, sewer, reclaimed water and water utilities, drainage facilities, street lights, traffic signals, signs, fire hydrants and transitions to existing improvements in the manner required by the City Engineer. All streets shall conform to the City's Street Design Standards Policy adopted by City Council Resolution No. 15349 unless otherwise conditioned or approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 2. Construct or enter into an agreement to construct and secure the full street improvements or remaining street improvements outlined in Table "A" below. The City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building may, at their discretion, modify the sequence, schedule, alignment and design of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision. Resolution 19447 Page 7 TABLE A STREET IMPROVEMENTS FACIUTY FAClUTYI UMIT$ AGRE~ TO CONSTRUCT AND GUARANTEE I Clubhouse Hunte Parkway to Street "A" First Final Map Drive Initial Phase 2 Clubhouse Street "A" to easterly ~erminus with First Final Map Drive Street "B" Initial Phase 3 Hunte Otay Lakes Road to Clubhouse First Final Map Parkway Drive Remaining Phase 4 Hunte Clubhouse Drive to Oak Spbngs First Final Map Parkway Drive Initial Phase 5 Hunte Oak Springs Drive to Olympic First Final Map Parkway Parkway Initial Phase 6 Olympic SR-~ 25 to Hunte Parkway First Final Map Parkway Initial Phase 7 Olympic Hunte Parkway to Wueste Road Uoder construction. Completion Parkway date February 2001 8 Otay Lakes Hunte Parkway to easterly First Final Map Road subdivision boundary Remaining Phase 9 Street"A" Clubhouse Drive to Street "L" First Final Map Initial Phase 10 Street "A" Hunte Parkway to Street '*A" First Final Map Initial Phase a. FACILITY NO. 1 Construct Clubhouse Drive to the designed full-width street improvements, as approved by the City Engineer, and include an 8-foot meandering decomposed granite walkway on the north side of the street and an 8-foot meandering concrete walkway on the south side of the street, The timing for completion of improvement construction shall be prior to the opening of the proposed Eastlake Trails elementary school site which is scheduled to open the first quarter of the Year 2000. (Engineering) b. FACILITY NO. 2 Construct Clubhouse Drive to the designed full-width street improvements, as approved by the City Engineer, and include an 8-foot meandering decomposed granite walkway on the north side of the street and an 8-foot meandering concrete walkway on south side of the street. (Engineering) Resolution 19447 Page 8 c. FACILITY NO. 3 Construct the missing street improvements along Hunte Parkway from Otay Lakes Road to Clubhouse Drive. The missing street improvements shall include the necessary grading and construction required to provide for an 8-foot wide meandering concrete walkway on the eastern side of Hunte Parkway and any other street improvements l:letermined to be necessary by the City Engineer. Any additional street right-of-way required to complete said improvements shall be granted to the City prior td approval of the Initial Phase first Final Map. (Engineering) d. FACILITY NO. 4 Construct the missing street improvements along Hunte Parkway from Clubhouse Drive to Oak Springs Drive. The missing street improvements shall include the necessary grading and construction required to provide for an 8' wide meandering concrete walkway on the eastern side of Hunte Parkway and any other street improvements determined to be necessary by the City Engineer. Any additional street right-of-way required to complete said improvements shall be granted to the City prior to approval of the Initial Phase first final map. The timing for completion of improvement construction shall be prior to the opening of the Eastlake Trails elementary school site which is scheduled to open the first quarter of the Year 2000. (Engineering) e. FACILITY NO. 5 Construct the full-width street improvements for Hunte Parkway from Oak Springs Drive to Olympic Parkway. Improvement plans for the subject portion of Hunte Parkway have been submitted and approved by the City. The City of Chula Vista drawing numbers corresponding to the street improvements are 90- 1030 through 90-1037 and 91-44 through 91-57. The bonds for material and labor and faithful performance for the two sets of drawings were posted by American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, and the bond numbers corresponding to the two sets of drawings are 158541802 (July 23, 1998) and 158541783 (July 23, 1998), respectively. (Engineering) f. FACILITY NO. 6 Construction of Olympic Parkway from SR~125 to Plunte Parkway shall commence within twelve months of the completion of construction phase I, and III of Olympic Parkway, or by March 1, 2002, whichever occurs later. The City may, upon written request by the Developer, use its power of eminent domain to acquire the right of way for Olympic Parkway outside the EastLake property ownership. The developer has entered into an agreement with the City, dated May 26, 1998, whereby the Developer agreed to construct the ultimate full-width street improvements for Olympic Parkway (East Orange Avenue) from Hunte Parkway to the westerly subdivision boundary of the EastLake Greens subdivision. Construction security for material and labor and faithful performance for said Resolution 19447 Page 9 street improvements was posted by American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania on May 21, 1998, and the bond number issued to the securities is 158541752. An approved set of improvement plans for the subject ultimate street improvements does not currently exist, however, approval of such plans is anticipated in the near future. Due to the absence of approved plans, a contingency factor of 50% was added to the estimated cost of the subject street improvements and this contingency was accounted for in the posted bond amount. (E, ngineering) g. FACILITY NQ. 7 Olympic Parkway was initially designed, as an interim condition, to be a four- lane roadway from Hunte Parkway to Wueste Road. Construction security for material and labor and faithful performance for the four-lane improvements was posted by American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania on Ju~y 23, 1998, and a Construction Permit for the improvement work of the interim condition was issued on November 6, 1998. The City of Chula Vista drawing numbers corresponding to said securities and Construction Permit are 91-44 through 91-57 and the bond number issued to the securities is 158541783. Subsequent to the interim four-lane roadway design approval, but prior to commencement of any four-lane improvemen~ work, a Construction Change was performed on the aforementioned drawings That resulted in the ultimate design of Olympic Parkway as a six-lane prime arterial. The additional costs associated with constructing the six-lane roadway was secured separately by the same surety company on February 4, 1999. The bond number corresponding to the material and labor and faithful performance of the additional improvement work is 158541878. It is anticipated that a Construction Permit for the six-lane improvement work will be issued in the near future. Any right-of-way needed to construct this portion of Olympic Parkway shall be granted to the City on the first Final Map of the initial Phase. The meandering decomposed granite walkway proposed along the frontage of the Eastlake Trails southern boundary (northern side of the Qlympic Parkway centerline) shall be lO-feet wide. (Engineering) h. FACILITY NO. 8 Construct Otay Lakes Road as a full-width six lane prime arterial along the entire frontage of the Eastlake Trails northern subdivision boundary with transitions to the existing roadway easterly of the eastern subdivision boundary. Ail off-site and on-site right-of-way needed to construct the eastbound transition and the ultimate street improvements, respectively, shall be granted prior to approval of the Remaining Phase first Final Map. The schedule for construction of the above improvements shall be determined or approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the aforementioned final map. Resolution 19447 Page 10 The proposed meandering sidewalk along the Eastlake Trails northern boundary (south side of Otay Lakes Road) shall be concrete and 8-foot wide. The construction of the proposed sidewalk on the north side of Otay Lakes Road (along the limits of the subdivision boundary) shall be deferred until development occurs along the north frontage of Otay Lakes Road. (Engineer/ng) i. FACILITY NO. 9 Construct Street "A" to the 'designed full-width street improvements as approved by the City Engineer. The timing for completion of improvement construction shall be prior to the opening of the proposed Eastlake Trails elementary school site, which is scheduled to open the first quarter of the Year 2000. (Eng/neer/ng) j. FACILITY NO. 10 Construct Street "L" to the designed full-width street improvements as approved by the City Engineer. The timing for completion of improvement construction shall be prior to the opening of the proposed Easdake Trails elementary school site, which is scheduled to open the first quarter of the Year 2000. (Engineen)~g) 3. Provide traffic control devices, as required by the City Engineer, for the roundabout Street "MM." (Engmeer/hg) 4. Design all cul-de-sacs proposed to be a maximum of 150-feet in length to have a minimum curbline radius of 36-feet and a minimum right-of-way radius of 46-feet. The 5.50-foot Street Tree Planting and Maintenance Easement shall be granted throughout the cul-de-sac. (Engineering) 5. Design, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, Street "GG," Court "D" and Court "E" to preclude on-street parking on one side. (Engineering) 6. Submit and obtain approval from the Director of Planning and Building and the City Engineer for all street names. No two interseotions shall have the same street name and street name suffixes shall comply with City standards. (Engineering, Planning) 7. Provide, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Fire Chief, adequate pedestrian/vehicular street improvements for access to the school site prior to the opening of the Eastlake Trails elementary school, which is scheduled to open the first quarter of the Year 2000. The improvements shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. All signs and markings related to the proposed elementary school. b. Pedestrian crossings across Hunte Parkway at King Creek Way, Oak Springs Drive and Clubhouse Drive. c. Concrete sidewalks along entire per,meter of the elementary school site. Resolution 19447 Page 11 d. Paved roadways along the entire perimeter of the proposed elementary school site to allow for two-way traffic and comply with the Fire and Police Department requirements. (Engineering) 8. Obtain approval from the City Engineer for street light locations. (Engineering) 9. Construct sidewa~k'widths and pedestrian ramps on all walkways to meet or exceed the "Americans with Disabilities Act" (ADA) and City standards. (Engineering 10. Qbtain approval from the City Engineer for the design and construction of raised medians on Otay Lakes Road., Clubhouse Drive, King Creek Way and Oak Springs Drive in conjunction with improvement plans for each of these streets. (Engineering) 11. Provide a letter from the Otay Water District indicating that the subdivision will be provided with adequate water service and long term water storage facilities. (Engineering, Planning) 12. Design and construct all street intersections that are at or near horizontal and vertical curves to meet the sight distance requirements prescribed in the City standards. ' fEngineering) 13. Provide minimum 5-foot wide bicycle lanes on the following streets: a. Qak Springs Drive - from Hunte Parkway to Street "A." b. King Creek Way - from Hunte Parkway to Street "BB" / Street "CC." c. Clubhouse Drive - from Hume Parkway to easterly terminus at Street (Engineering) 14. Acquire and then grant to the City all off-site rights-of-way necessary for the installation of required street improvements for the affected phase prior to approval of the corresponding Final Map. (Engineering) 15. Notify the City at least sixty days prior to City Council consideration of the affected Final Map, if off-site right-of-way cannot be obtained as required above (Only off-site right-of-way or easements affected by Section 66462.5 of the Subdivision Map Act are covered by this condition). After said notification and prior to the approval of the affected Final Map, the developer shall: a. Pay the full cost of acquiring off-site right-of-way or easements required by the Tentative Map conditions of approval. b. Deposit with the City the estimated cost of acquiring said right-of-way or easements. The amount of the deposit is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. c. Prepare and submit all easement and/or right-of*way documents, plats and appraisals necessary to commence condemnation proceedings. Resolution 19447 Page 12 If the developer so requests, the City may use its power of eminent domain to acquire right-of-way, easements or licenses needed for off-site improvements or work related to the tentative map. The developer shall pay all costs, both direct and indirect incurred in said acquisition. If the City does not acquire or commence proceedings for immediate possession of the property within the 120-day time li~'nitation specified in Section 66462.5 of the State Subdivision Map Act, the condition to construct the related off-site improvements, which fall under the purview of the abbve mentioned Section of the Subdivision Map Act, is waived, fEngineer¢hg) 16. Construct a temporary turnaround or street'improvements, as determined necessary by the City Engineer and Fire Marshal, at the end of temporarily stubbed streets greater than 150-feet. in length (as measured from the nearest centerline intersection). (Engineering) 17. Provide an interim eastbound deceleration lane along Otay Lakes Road for the entrance to park site (P-3) concurrent with the completion of P-3 if the ultimate south half street improvements for Otay Lakes Road are not completed at that time. (Engineering, P/anning) 15. Provide interim traffic control devices, as required by the City Engineer, to detour pedestrian traffic to the nearest street crossing if a signalized pedestrian crossing is not available when the greenbelt trail is completed and connected to Otay Lakes Road and Olympic Parkway. (Engineering, Planning) 19. Design and construct, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the existing street center lines, travel lanes, striping and curb lines of North Greensview Drive, South Greensview Drive and Clubhouse Drive within Eastlake Greens to align with King Creek Way, Oak Springs Drive and the extension of Clubhouse Drive within the Eastlake Trails subdivision, respectively, fEngineen~g] 20, Design and construct the lane reduction transitions along Clubhouse Drive, King Creek Way and Oak Springs Drive within Eastlake Trails to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (Engineering) 21. Install, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. street lights on traffic signal poles at the intersections of Hunte Parkway with Clubhouse Drive, King Creek Way and Oak Springs Drive. If traffic signals are not required at these intersections, install standard street lighting fixtures. (Engineering) 22. Design and construct underground traffic signal equipment and traffic signal standards at the locations determined by the City Engineer. (Engineering) GRADING AND DRAINAGE 23. Submit hydrologic and hydraulic studies and calculations, including dry lane calculations for all public streets. Calculations shall also be provided to demonstrate the adequacy of downstream drainage structures, pipes and inlets, fEngineering) Resolution 19447 Page 13 24. Accomplish storm drain design on the basis of the requirements of the Subdivision Manual and the Grading Ordinance ( #1797 as amended). (Engineering) 25. Provide graded access to all storm drain clean outs or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 26. Design the storm clrains and other drainage facilities to include Best Management Practices to minimize non-point source pollution, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (Engineering) ' 27. Designate on the plans as private, to the point of connection with the public system, all storm drain systems that collect water from private property. (Engineering) 28. Design and construct storm drain cleanouts to not be located on slopes or in inaccessible areas for maintenance equipment. (Engineering) 29. Designate as private and maintain by a Home Owner's Association the storm drain between lots 117 and 118 in neighborhood TN-3. Include in the CC&R's conditions and restrictions to assure proper maintenance. (Engineering) 30. Design and construct all public storm drains as close to perpendicular to the slope contours as possible but in no case greater than 15 degrees from perpendicular to the contours. (Engineering) 31. Designate as private and maintain by a Home Owner's Association all storm drain clean outs carrying private property water and determined by the City to be in areas inaccessible for maintenance equipment. Include in the CC&R's conditions and restrictions to assure proper maintenance. (Engineering) ;32. Design and construct brow ditches to not flow over a slope greater than ten-feet in height and steeper thana3:l. Drainage shall be collected in an inlet and carried to the bottom of the slope in an underground storm drain. (Engineering) 33. Provide runoff detention facilities or demonstrate the adequacy of existing detention facilities, to be approved by the City Engineer, to assure that the maximum allowable discharges after development do not exceed pre-development discharges. The developer also needs to provide for the future maintenance of the facilities via the landscaping maintenance district. (Engineering) 34. Design and construct local storm drain system to prevent discharge into the proposed private park lake (lot P-2). (Engineering) 35. Provide energy dissipators at all storm drain outlets as required by the City Engineer to maintain non-erosive flow velocities. (Engineering) 36. Request, if necessary, that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) revise the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report for the area influenced by the Eastlake Trails project. A revision may be warranted for the project area due to improvements to Salt Creek and the possibility of proposed residential units for the project currently being shown within a flood zone. (Engineering) Resolution 19447 Page 14 37. Design and construct the improved access extending easterly from tot P-2 to the easterly subdivision boundary so that access is not impeded for pedestrians and vehicles due to upstream runoff. Potential solutions may include a bridge over the creek or an adequately sized drainage pipe under the improved access or any other solution satisfactory to the City Engineer. (Engineering) 38. Submit to and obtain approval froth the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building for an erosion and sedimentation control plan as part of grading plans. (Engineering, Planning) 39. Submit a detailed mitigation plan, prior to issuance of grading permits, for the creation and enhancement of riparian vegetation within the Salt Creek Corridor. The plan will be subject to approval by the Director of Planning and Building. The mitigation plan shall include components addressing performance standards, maintenance requirements (e.g. pest control, weeding, and plant replacement), monitoring and report preparation. The wetland mitigation area shall be maintained in accordance with the Wetland Mitigation Plan. (P/anning/Environrnenta/) 40. Provide a minimum of three-feet of flat ground access area from the face of any wall to the beginning of the slope rounding for wall maintenance, unless as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 41. Locate lot lines at the top of slopes except as approved by the City Engineer. Lots shall be so graded as to drain to the street or an approved drainage system. Drainage shall not be permitted to flow over slopes or onto adjacent property. (Engineering, Planning) 42. Design and construct all grading and pad elevations to be within 2 feet of the grades and elevations shown on the approved tentative map or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building. (Engineering, Planning) 43. Obtain notarized letters of permission for all off-site grading work prior to issuance of grading permit for work requiring said off-site grading. (Engineering) 44. Submit a list of proposed lots, prior to appr.oval of the corresponding Final Map, indicating whether the structure will be located on fill, cut, or a transition between the two situations prior to approval of the first Final Map. (Engineering) 45. Design and construct the inclination of each cut or fill surface resulting in a slope to not be steeper than 2:1 ( two horizontal to one vertical) except for minor slopes as herein defined. All constructed minor slopes shall be designed for proper stability considering both geological and soil properties, A minor slope may be constructed no steeper than one and one-half horizontal to one vertical (1.5: 1) contingent upon: a. Submission of reports by both a soils engineer and a certified engineering geologist containing the results of surface and subsurface exploration and analysis. These results should be sufficient for the soils engineer and engineering geologist to certify that in their professional opinion, the underlying bedrock and soil supporting the slope have strength characteristics sufficient to provide a stable slope and will not pose a danger to persons or property; and Resolution 19447 Page 15 b. The installation of an approved special slope planting program and irrigation system; and c. A "Minor Slope" is defined as a slope four (4) feet or less in vertical dimension in either cut or fill, between single family lots and not parallel to any roadway. (Engineering) 46. Enter into an agreement with the City wherein the City is held harmless from any liability from erosion, §iltation or increase in flow of drainage resulting from this project.(Engineering, Planning) SEWER 47. Design all sewer access points (manholes) to be located at street centerline or at the center of a travel lane or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 48. Provide a sewer profile study for all deep "Local" and "Trunk" sewer lines (15-feet in depth or greater) which indicates that no other feasible alternative exists except for deep sewer lines. If the profile study is approved by the City Engineer, the deep sewer lines will be permitted for construction. (Engineering) 49. Install parallel sewer lines for sewer lines greater than 15-feet in depth if lateral lines are to be connected to these lines unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. For sewer lines greater than 20-feet in depth, C900 P.V.C. shall be used from manhole to manhole. (Engineering) 50. Submit a letter of credit, prior to recordation of the subdivision Final Map for said lot, for all sanitary sewer facilities required for development of any lot subject to Telegraph Canyon Sewer Pumped Flows DIF. (Engineering) 5t. Pay in full, prior to recordation of the subdivision Final Map for said lot, all sanitary sewer facilities required for development of any lot subject to Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF. (Engineering) 52. Provide improved access to all sewer manholes to withstand H-20 wheel Icad or other loading as approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 53. Design and construct sewer access points to not be located on slopes or in inaccessible areas for maintenance equipment. (Engineering) 54. Provide sewer manholes at all changes of alignment of grade. Sewers serving ten or less equivalent dwelling units shall have a minimum grade of 1 percent. (Engineering) 55. Design and construct all sewers ending in a cul-de-sac with a manhole placed at the center of the cul-de-sac, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 56. Provide for the costs associated with the maintenance and the potential upgrading of the sewer pump station located at 2660 Otay Lakes Road in accordance with the agreement between the City, Pacific Bay Homes and The Eastlake Company, dated January 20, 1998. (Engineering) Resolution 19447 Page 16 AGREEMENTS 57. Agree that the City may withhold building permits for the subject subdivision if any one of the following occur: a. Regional development threshold limits set by the East Chula Vista Transportation Phasing Plan,'as amended from time to time, have been reached. b. Traffic volumes, levels of servibe, public utilities and/or services exceed the adopted City threshold standards in the then effective Growth Management Ordinance and Growth Management. Program c. The required public facilities, as identified in the PFFP or as amended or otherwise conditioned have not been completed or constructed to satisfaction of the City. The developer may propose changes in the timing and sequencing of development and the construction of improvements affected. In such case, the PFFP may be amended as approved by the Director of Planning and Building and Director of Public Works. (Engineering, Planning) 58. Agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its agents, officers, or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by the City, including approval by its Planning Commission, City Council or any approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision pursuant to Section 66499.37 of the State Map Act provided the City promptly notifies the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that the City fully cooperates in the defense. (Engineerthg, P/annlhg) 59. Agree to ensure that all franchised cable television companies ("Cable Company") are permitted equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television service to each lot within the subdivision. Restrict access to the conduit to only those franchised cable television companies who are, and remain in compliance with, all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are in further compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been, .or may from time to time be issued by the City of Chula Vista. (Engineering, Planning) 60. Developer agrees to not protest formation of a district for the maintenance of the drainage channel in Salt Creek or for the maintenance of landscaped medians, open space, and parkways along streets within and adjacent to the subdivision. (Engineering, Planning) 61. Agree to reserve lot S-1 (school site) for school purposes to be offered for dedication in fee to the Chula Vista Elementary School District, in accordance with a schedule as indicated in a Mello Roos community purpose facility district, as approved by the school district, which shall be established to the satisfaction of the District. (Planning) 62. Agree to provide noise study prior to issuance of the Initial Phase first building permit to identify noise impacts generated by surrounding streets and determine the necessary mitigation measures to insure that all dwelling units will be design and constructed to //-/? Resolution 19447 Page 17 preclude interior noise levels over 45 dBA and exterior noise exposure over 65 dBA. The developer shall implement all mitigation measures recommended in the noise study to reduce noise impacts. {Planning) 63. Agree to participate in a regional or sub-regional multi-species coastal sage scrub conservation plan prior to approval of the Initial Phase first Final Map. (Planning) 64. Enter into an agreement with the City to provide affordable housing units as specified in the adopted Eastlake'Comprehensive Affordable Housing Program prior to approval of the first Final Map. (Community Development] OPEN SPACE/ASSESSMENTS 65. Grant Irrevocable Offers of Dedication (IOD) on the Final Map for Open Space lots within the subdivision. (Engineering) 66. Either a Home Owner's Association (HOA) or a Community Facilities District shall maintain street medians and environmental open space lots. If the formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD) is selected for the maintenance of street medians and/or environmental open space lots (OS-1), Developer shall request that the City form a Community Facilities District, prior to approval of the first Final Map of the Initial phase, and submit an application packet for the formation of said The Packet shall include, but is not limited to, associated diagrams, cost estimate, description of work and a deposit in the amount determined by the City Engineer at the time of submittal for processing the formation of the Community Facilities District. If the HOA is formed to provide maintenance to the environmental lot OS-1 and other lots, structure the HOA maintenance program, including maintenance crew qualifications and other contractual arrangements to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. (Engineering, Planning) 67. Pay for all costs associated with the preparation of an Engineer's Report and establishment of a Community Facilities District / Open Space Maintenance District for the maintenance of all open spaces which will not be maintained by private property owners or a Home Owner's Association. (Engineering, Planning) 68. Provide a plan for the City's approval that includes the acreage, landscaping code for each open space area, the proposed means of maintaining the area and the cost per year for the perpetual maintenance of maintaining improvements within CFD maintained open space lets, (Engineering, Planning) 69. Conform to the design elements of the City's Landscape Manual for all landscaping which falls within the maintenance responsibility of the Community Facilities District. (Engineering, Planning) 70. Establish a Home Owner's Association (HOA) to provide for the perpetual maintenance of, but not limited to, private open space lots, slope areas, landscape and irrigation , including perimeter wall within open space lots, public street improvements and medians and parkways on Clubhouse Drive, King Creek Way and Oak Springs Drive prior to the approval of the associated Final Map. (Engineering, Planning) Resolution 19447 Page 18 71. Maintain all decomposed granite (D.G.) walkways by a Home Owner's Association or CFD. All proposed decomposed granite (D.G.) walkways including, but not limited to, the walkways proposed along the north side of Clubhouse Drive and north of Olympic Parkway, shall not have vertical obstacles and obstructions such as public utility vaults, boxes, etc. constructed within them. (Engineering, Planning) 72. Provide proof to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building that alt improvements located on open space lots will be incorporated into and maintained by a Home Owner'~ AssoCiation or a CFD. The final determination of which open space areas/improvements to be included in the Community Facilities District and those to be maintained by a Home Owner's Association shall be made during the CFD formation proceedings. (Engineering, Planning) 73. Enter into a maintenance agreement and grant easements as necessary for landscaping maintained by a Home Owner's Association within City right-of-way or such other areas required by the City. (Engineering, Planning) 74. Avoid installation of privately owned water, reclaimed water, or other utilities crossing any public street. This shall include the prohibition of the installation of sleeves for future construction of privately owned facilities. The City Engineer may waive this requirement if the following is accomplished: a. The developer enters into an agreement with the City where the developer agrees to the following: 1. Apply for an encroachment permit for installation of the private facilities within the public right-of-way. 2. Maintain membership in an advance notice such as the USA Dig Alert Service. 3. Mark out any private facilities owned by the developer whenever work is performed in the area. 4. The terms of this agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the developer. b. Shutoff devices as determined by the City Engineer are provided at those locations where private facilities traverse public streets. (Engineering, Planning) 75. Pay all costs associated with apportionment of assessments for all City assessment districts as a result of subdivision of lands within the boundary prior to approval of the each Final Map. Submit an apportionment form and provide a deposit as determined by and to the City to cover costs. (Engineering) 76. Prepare a disclosure form to be signed by the home buyer acknowledging that additional fees have been paid into the Assessment District or the Transportation DIF. Fund, and that these additional fees are reflected in the purchase price of the home for those units, should the development have a density change from that indicated in the Assessment District Engineer's Report. (Engineering) Resolution 19447 Page 19 77. Submit all Special Tax and Assessment disclosure forms for each model size or EDU for the approval of the City Engineer. (Engineering) 78. Comply with the terms and conditions of the Acquisition/Financing Agreement for Assessment District 94-1, CO 94-064, approved by Council Resolution 17483 as said terms and conditions may be applicable to this development. (Engineering) 79. Design and construct all of the utilities that service open space within the limits of the open space or dedicatea City right-of-way. (Engineering). 80. Agree that walls which are lo. cared within open space shall have owners of adjoining lots sign a statement when purchasing their homes that they are aware that the wall is on Open Space property and that they may not modify or supplement the wall or encroach onto Open Space property. These restrictions shall be reflected in the project CC&R's, and a copy of said restrictions shall be provided to the City for its approval. (Engineering, Planning) 81. Prior to the issuance of the 50th building permit for the Project, enter into the City's standard three party Agreement with the City of Chula Vista and a landscape architecture consulting firm for the preparation and processing of the Project's Community Park Master Plan (P-1 & P-3.). (Planning) 82. Prior to the issuance of the 350th building permit for the Project, prepare, submit and obtain the approval from the Director of Planning and Building for the Project's Community Park Master Plan(P-1 and P-3.) The Community Park Master Plan shall include facilities and amenities prescribed in the forthcoming City-wide Parks Master Plan as adopted by City Council. Inthe event that the forthcoming City-wide Parks Master Plan is not adopted before the community park design begins, the Director of Planning and Building shall determine the appropriate park facilities for the community park. (Planning) 83. Design, construct and dedicate park facilities as prescribed in the following park development phasing program: Qbtain the necessary City approvals and complete park master plan construction documents prior to approval of the 600th building permit b. Select contractors, as approved by the Director of Planning and Building, and begin grading and construction of the community park, including all facilities and amenities, prior to the issuance of the 650th building permit. c. All improvements to the community park, as defined by the Approved construction documents, shall be completed to the satisfaction and approval of the Director of Planning and Building prior to the issuance of the 780th building permit. d. Provide maintenance of the completed community park for a period of one-year from the completion of the park to acceptance of the facility by the City. Resolution 19447 Page 20 e. Final alignment, design (including signs), width and construction specifications for the greenbelt trail along the east edge of the Salt Creek open space corridor shall be approved by the Planning and Building Director in conjunction with and subject to the development phasing of the overall community park design. f. The Director of Planning and Building may, at his discretion, delay the park development phasing and construction sequence should conditions change to warrant such delay. If, in the opinion of the City, delay is caused by the City, the Developer may be allowed t'o delay construction of the park. (Planning) 84. Prior to approval of the first Final Map of the Initial phase, prepare, submit and obtain approval from the Design Review Committ"ee for the private park (P-2) design and complete construction prior to issuance of the 150th building permit. (Planning/Parks) 85. Prepare, submit and obtain the approval of the Director of Planning and Building for a comprehensive Landscape Master Plan for the Project. (Planning/Parks) 86. Prepare, submit and obtain approval by the Director of Planning and Building for detailed landscape and irrigation plans, including water management guidelines in accordance with the Chula Vista Landscape Manual and Section 11.4, Design Guidelines, of the Eastlake Trails SPA for the associated landscaped areas in each Final Map prior to the approval of each Final Map. If Poplus species trees are incorporated in the Eastlake Trails Landscape theme, appropriate installation methods acceptable to the Director of Planning and Building shall be prescribed in the landscape improvement plans, (Planning/Parks) 87. Construct pedestrian walkway connections between streets to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building at the following locations: a. From the cul-de-sac ends on Streets "GG" and "HH" through open space lot C to Clubhouse drive. b. From the cul-de-sac ends on Streets "K" and "J" through open space lot F to Clubhouse drive. c. From street "MM" through open space lot E to Street "LL." Approval shall be documented prior to the approval of the corresponding Final Maps. (Planning) 88. Include in the Grading plans for the Project's Community Park an inventory of all existing trees to be retained and those to be removed prior to issuance of grading permits involving the community park site. Final decision as to which trees are to be retained and which are to be removed shall be made by the Director of Planning and Building, and in conjunction with the Community Park Master Plan. (Planning) 89. Relocate at Developer's own expense, the necessary above and underground utilities serving individual homes to accommodate the required street trees within the street tree planting easement if determined necessary by the City. (Planning) //- Resolution 19447 Page 21 90. Pay the land acquisition, portioh of the PAD fee for the Initial Phase of the Eastlake Trails subdivision, which consists of 626 dwelling units, prior to the recordation of the first final map for the Initial Phase (approximately $1,315,530). Developer also shall pay the Eastlake III Development Agreement advance PAD fee of (;1, 522,000 (Adjusted by ENR index from the effective day of the Agreement to the time of payment) prior to the recordation of the first final map for the Initial Phase. The land acquisition portion ~f the PAD fee ($1,315,530) shall be decreased so that the sum of the park land acquisition portion of the PAD fee and the advance PAD fee stipulated in the above mentioned £astlake III Development Agreement, does not exceed the total PAl:) fees required for the number of units in the Initial Phase. However, the applicant may elect to make an irrevocable offer to dedicate the community park parcels P-1 and P-3 as depicted in the tentative map, Chula Vista Tract 99-03, in lieu of the above park land acquisition fee stipulated above. (Planning). EASEMENTS 91. Grant on the corresponding Final Map minimum 15-foot wide easements to the City of Chula Vista, as required by the City Engineer, for construction and maintenance of sewer facilities. (Engineering) 92. Grant on the corresponding Final Map minimum 15-foot wide easements to the City of Chula Vista, as required by the City Engineer, for construction and maintenance of storm drain facilities. (Engineering) 93. Grant on the corresponding Final Map lO-foot wide general utility easements, as required by the City Engineer, along street right-of-way adjacent to open space lots. (Engineering) 94. Grant easements for all off-site public storm drains and sewer facilities prior to approval of any Final Map requiring those facilities. The easements shall be the size as required by City standards unless otherwise approved. (Engineering) 95. Grant 20-foot landscape buffer easements adjacent to Otay Lakes Road and Olympic Parkway. (Engineering) 96. Grant to the City on the corresponding Final Map easements along all public streets within the subdivision as shown on the tentative map and in accordance with City standards unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Planning and Building. (Engineering, P/anning) 97. Dedicate for public use all the streets shown on the subject tentative map within the subdivision boundary, except private streets. (Engineering) 98. Grant to the City a drainage and access easement, as determined by the City Engineer, across the proposed private access that connects lot P-2 (Private Park) to the easterly subdivision boundary. (Engineering) Resolution 19447 Page 22 MISCELLANEOUS 99. A summary of City responses to each of applicants waiver requests from City standards is contained within the following Table I, which includes the "Approved" or "Not Approved" status of each waiver. The summary descriptions for each waiver within Table I are brief and the approved Tentative Map should be consulted for more complete descriptions of the waiver requests. TABLE h TENTATIVE MAP ~VAIVERS WAIVER BRIEF DESCRIPTION STATUS COMMENTS NO. 1 Decrease minimum centerlme radius or/ Street "MM" from *Approved None 200' to 126'. 2 Construct a 2% superelevation on StreeJ "MM" with a 45' *Approved None width R.O.W., a 28' curb to curb width and design as one- way. 3 Decrease the mmrI~um ROW. width on Street "GG" and On-street parking will Courts "D" and "E" from 56' to 52'. only be allowed on one * Approved side of the street to be determined by the City Engineer. 4 Decrease the minu'num curbline radius from 40' to 35' for *Approved None cul-de-sacs 150' in length or less. 5a Increase the required 5.5' wide "Landscape Easemem" ac Approved None Clubhouse Drive 1o 22' m width. 5b Delete 5.5' "Landscape Easement" for Street "5" from Approved None approximately Stree~, "CC" to Street "G" on the s~de adjacent to P-1 and for Struet "BB" Jr~)m ~]pprcJxJrnately Street "CC" to Street "G" on the side adiacent to P-1. 5C increase "Landscape Easement" inciinatior~ from 5:1 to 2:1 Approved None for the tallowing corner lots which have adjacent streets lower than the pads: TS2 - Lots 6, 45; TS3 - Lots 7, 9, 41, 44, 53, 75, 76, 97, 107, 121, 130, ;46, 153, 154; TS4-Lots 35,49; TSS-Lots 1, 7, 8, 14, 22, 23, 30, 37, 38,69,70,89,90, 96; TS6-Lots6,47,71 TN3 - Lots 21, 29, 55,56,58,80,93, 101, 113 6 Less than Standard 35' Lot Frontage for: TS-5: Lots 1, 7, Approved None 8, 14, 15, 23, 37, 38, 52, 62, 64, 55, 70, 77, 80, 81, 82, 89, 90, 96, 97 and 103; TS-6: Lots 6, 10 and 11. 7a "Local" sewer exceeds 12' in depth. Not May be approved by Approved City Engineer ~t the time that improvement plans are submitted for approval 7b "Trunk" sewer exceeds 20' in depth. Approved C90o P.V.C. will be used from manhole to manhole. Resolution 19447 Page 23 8b 8' meandering D.G. walkways on N. side of Clubhouse Dr. Approved None end E. side of "B" / "BB' Streets and 10' meandering D.G. Walkway on N. Side of Olympic Parkway. 9 Medians on Clubhouse Dr., King Creek Way and Oak Approved None Springs Dr. 10 Street intersections within horizontal curves or within 100' *Approved None tangents of horizontal curves. 11 Sewer Laterals Deeper T~nan 15' in Depth. Not May be approved by Approved City Engineer at the time that improvement plans are submitted for approval 12 Slope Rounding and Bench Per Detail on Tentative Map and Approved None 3' Bench with No Slope Rounding at Slopes North of Oak Springs Dr. and North of Olympic Parkway. 13 Maximum height from top of wood fence to top of wall Approved None footing is 8.5' if on proper~y line. If greater than 8.5', a 4' separation between wood fence and wail is required· The ~ following lots are exceptions: TS2-10, TS3-121, TS6-5 and 46. * The City's approval of the waiver request is contingent upon submittal of a letter from applicants Engineer-of-Work explaining that, in their professional opinion, no public safety issues will be compromised. (Engineering, Planning/ 100. Submit "as-built" improvement and grading plans as required by the City Subdivision Manual. Additionally, provide the City said plans in a digital D.X.F. file format. (Engineering) 101. Submit a copy of each subdivision in a digitaI D.X.F. file format prior to approval of its associated Final Map or as requested by the City Engineer. The digital file shall be based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and the NAD 83 State Plane Coordinate System. The digital file shall specifically include each of the following items in a separate drawing layer: a. Lot Boundaries, b. Lot Numbers, c. Subdivision Boundary, d. Right-of-Way, e. Street Centerlines, and f. Approved Street Names· Submit the digital file in accordance with City Guidelines for Digital Submittal on 3Y~" disks or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In addition, submit as-built grading and improvement plans in a digital D.X.F. file format. Provide security to guarantee the ultimate submittal of grading and improvement digital files. Update electronic files after any construction pen and ink changes to the grading or improvement plans and resubmit to the City· (Engineering/ Resolution 19447 Page 26 117. Submit to the Planning and Building, and Engineering Departments service availability letter from the Otay Water District prior to approval of each Final Map. (Planning, Engineering) 118. Install potable and recycled water infrastructure improvements as prescribed in the Eastlake Trails Sub- area Water Master Plan prepared by John Powell and Associates, September, 1998, including but not limited to the [ollowing improvements: a. Provide a letter from OWD confirming that upon completion of the potable and recycled water infrastructure facilities, the Developer shall dedicate the improvements to the Otay Water DiStrict. b. Extend the existing potable and recycled water mains in Hunte Parkway south to Olympic Parkway, and construct mains in Olympic Parkway from Hunte parkway to the Olympic Training Center. c. Remove the temporary 12" pipeline that crosses the Eastlake Trails project after the water lines prescribed in the Sub-area Water Master Plan are installed. fEngineering) 119. Prepare and obtain approval by the Director of Planning and Building for a detailed mitigation plan for the creation and enhancement of riparian vegetation within the Salt Creek Corridor. The mitigation plan shall include components addressing performance standards, maintenance requirements (e.g. pest control, weeding and plant replacement) , monitoring and report preparation, perimeter fencing, signage and a sales disclosure document advising home buyers that OS-1 is a protected environmental preserve lot. (Planning) 120. Obtain State Department of Fish & Game (1603 Stream bed AIteration Agreement) and Federal (Section 404 Clean Water Act) permits prior to approval of grading permit for the Initial Phase. (Planning/Environmental) CODE REQUIREMENTS 121. Comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual. (Engineering, Planning) 122. Underground all utilities within the subdivision in accordance with Municipal Code requirements. (Engineering) 123. Pay all applicable fees in accordance with the City Code and Council Policy, including, but not limited to, the following: Resolution 19447 Page 27 Prior to issuance of the first building permit: The Transportation and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees. a. Signal Participation Fees. c. All applicable' sewer fees, including but not limited to sewer connection fees. d. SR-125 impact f,ee. e. Telegraph Canyon Pump Sewer Fee, f. Salt Creek Sewer Basin Fee. (Planning, Parks & Engineering) 124. Comply with all relevant Federal, State, and Local regulations, including the Clean Water Act. The developer shall be responsible for providing all required testing and documentation to demonstration said compliance as required by the City Engineer. (Engineering, Planning) 125. Design all dwelling units to preclude interior noise levels over 45 dBA and shield all exterior private open space to limit noise exposure to 65 dBA. (Planning) 126. Comply with all applicable regulations established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) as set forth in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (N.P.D.E.S.) permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge and any regulations adopted by the City of Chula Vista pursuant to the N.P.D.E.S. regulations or requirements. Further, the applicant shall file notice of intent with the State Water Resources Control Board to obtain coverage under the N.P.D.E.S. General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity and shall implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) concurrent with the commencement of grading activities. The SWPPP shall include both construction and post construction pollution prevention and pollution control measures and shall identify funding mechanisms for post construction control measures. (Engineering) IX. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Resolution. Resolution 19447 Page 28 X. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provision, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction top be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. It is in the public's interest for City to require Eastlake to indemnify the city against the adverse risks and costs of a challenge to City's actions in preparing and approving an addendum to EIR 97-04 and approving the Tentative Subdivision Map for Eastlake Trails, Chula Vista Tract 99-03 and related discretionary approvals, if any; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve an Agreement for Indemnification and Covenants for Actions Taken by City related to Eastlake Trails, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City. Presented by Approved as to form by Planning and Building Director ,C,~,y'Attorney Resolution 19447 Page 29 · i'I PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 4'h day of May, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Davis, Moot, Padilla, Salas and Horton NAYS: Councitmemi~ers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None Shirley Hor~)n, Mayor ATTEST: Susan Bigelow, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) l, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 19447 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 4'h day of May, 1999. Executed this 4'h day of May, 1999. Susan Bigelow, City Clerk /1/29/00 21:02 FAX C.V. PLANNING & BlJLLDING 1~002 EastLake Trails North (TN1 & TN2) TIIE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters which wit[ require discretionary action by the Council, Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or f'mancial . interests, payments, or campaign contributions for aCity of Chula Vista election must be fried. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the propen'y that is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. The EastLake Company, LLC 2. If any person* identified pursuant'to (1) above is a corporation or parmership, list the names of all individuals with a $1000 invesm~ent in the business (corporation/parmership) entity. Boswell Properties, Inc. The Tulago Company 3. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficia~ or trustor of the trust. N/A 4. Please identify every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter? ....... Curt Smith-The EastLake Company, LLC Bill Ostrem-The EastLake Company, LLC Marwan Younis~May Group, Inc. 5. Has any person* associated with this con/xact had any financial dealings with an official** of thc City of Chula Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months. Yes' No X tl/2U/00 21:02 FAX C.V. PLANNING & BUILDING ~003 If Yes. briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official'/* may have in this'contract? 6. Have you made a contribution of more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council*. No X Yes __ If yes, which Council member? 7. Have you or any member of your governing board (i.e. Corporate Board of Directors/Executives, non-profit Board of Directors made contributions totaling more than $1,000 over the past four (4) years to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council7 Yes No X If Yes, which Council member? 8. Have you provided more than $300 (or an item of equivalent value) to aa official** of the City of Chula Vista in the past twelve (12) montb~*. (This includes being a sEurce of income, money to retire a legal debt, girl, loan, etc.) Yes ~ No X. If Yes, which official** and what was the hature of item provided? Date: December 1, 2000 ~gnatur eC6tiCuntract °r / Applicant Curt Smith Print or type name of.Contractor/Applicant_ _ _ * Person is defined a~: any individual, firm, co-partner~bip, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organq?~qon, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, cli~ict, or other political ~abdlvi~ion, -or any other group or combination actiug as a uait. ** Official includas, but i~ not'llmlted to: Mayor, Couacil member, Planning Commissioner, Member of a board, commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staff members. It:~ItOIvlEXENGINEER~DMIi~CONTKACT~S'TL25200.230toiler Miu) 14 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING FINAL MAP OF CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 99-03, EASTLAKE TRAILS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOODS TN-1 AND TN-2, ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE VARIOUS PUBLIC STREETS AND EASEMENTS, ALL AS GRANTED ON SAID MAP WITHIN SAID SUBDIVISION, AND APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY SAID SUBDIVISION AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the city of Chula Vista hereby finds that that certain map survey entitled Chu1a vista Tract NO. 99-03, EASTLAKE TRAILS NORTH NEIGHBORHOODS TN-1 AND TN-2, and more particularly described as follows: Being a subdivision of Parcel 3 and a portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 18211, in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, February 26, 1999 as File No. 1999-0121253 of Official Records together with Lot 538 of Chula vista Tract No. 99-03 Eastlake Trails South, in the city of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map No. 13812, filed in the office of the County of San Diego, June 18, 1999. Area: 26.083 acres Numbered Lots: 73 No. of Lots: 77 Lettered Lots: 4 is made in the manner and form prescribed by law and conforms to the surrounding surveys; and that said map and subdivision of land shown thereon is hereby approved and accepted upon receipt by the City of Chula Vista of all improvement securities described in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Council hereby accepts on behalf of the public the public streets, to-wit: King Creek Way, Coyote Ridge Lane, Silver Springs Drive, North Creekside Drive, Coyote Ridge Terrace, and King Creek Circle and said streets are hereby declared to be public streets and dedicated to the public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Council hereby accepts on behalf of the City of Chu1a vista the 5.50 foot street tree planting and sidewalk, 10-foot general utility, storm drain and general utility, 32-foot storm drain and general utility, 20-foot storm drain, sight visibility, and the 20-foot sidewalk easements. 1 I/Ii-/ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to endorse upon said map the action of said council; that said Council has approved said subdivision map, and that said public streets are accepted on behalf of the public as therefore stated and that those certain street tree planting and sidewalk easements, lo-foot general utility easements, storm drain and general utility easement, 32- foot storm drain and general utility easement, 20-foot storm drain easement, sight visibility easements, and the 20 - foot sidewalk easements, as granted thereon and shown on said map within said subdivision are accepted on behalf of the City of Chula vista as hereinabefore stated. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit said map to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego only upon the acceptance by the City of Chula Vista and its city Attorney of the improvement securities described in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that that certain Subdivision Improvement Agreement dated the day of December, 2000 for the completion of improvements in said subdivision, a copy of which is on file in the office of the city Clerk is hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works ~.. (TYrJ .~/~ Joh Kaheny, City Att ney H:\home\attorney\reso\ELTRAILS north TN1&2.FM 2 I if' 2- it 1 Recording Requested by: CITY CLERK When Recorded, Mail to: CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, Ca. 91910 No transfer tax is due as this is a conveyance to a public agency of less than a fee interest for which no cash consideration has been paid or received. Declarant SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of ____ , 2000__, by and between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City", and THE EASTLAKE COMPANY, 900 Lane Avenue, Suite 100, Chula vista, California 91914, hereinafter called "Subdivider" with reference to the facts set forth below, which Recitals constitute a part of this Agreement; RECITALS: WHEREAS, Subdivider is about to present to the City Council of the City of Chula vista for approval and recordation, a final subdivision map of a proposed subdivision, to be known as EASTLAKE TRAILS NEIGHBORHOODS TN-l AND TN-2 pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the provisions of Title 18 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code relating to the filing, approval and recordation of subdivision map; and, WHEREAS, the Code provides that before said map is finally approved by the Council of the City of ChulaVista, Subdivider must have either installed and completed all of the public improvements and/or land development work required by the Code to be installed in subdivisions before final maps of subdivisions are approved by the Council for purpose of recording in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, or, as an alternative thereto, Subdivider shall enter into an agreement with City, secured by an approved improvement security to insure the performance of said work pursuant to the requirements of Title 18 of the Chula vista Municipal Code, agreeing to install and complete, free of liens at Subdivider's own expense, all of the public improvements and/or land development work required in said subdivision within a definite period of time prescribed by said Council, and WHEREAS, Subdivider is willing in consideration of the approval and recordation of said map by the Council, to enter into 1- I/A-3 this agreement wherein it is provided that Subdivider will install and complete, at Subdivider's own expense, all the public improvement work required by City in connection with the proposed subdivision and will deliver to City improvement securities as approved by the City Attorney, and WHEREAS, a tentative map of said subdivision has heretofore been approved, subject to certain requirements and conditions, as contained in Resolution No. 19447, approved on the 4th day of May, 1999 ("Tentative Map Res.olution"); and WHEREAS, complete plans and specifications for the construction, installation and completion of said public improve- ment work have been prepared and submitted to the City Engineer, as shown on Drawings Nos.0114-01 through 00114-12, on file in the office of the City Engineer, and WHEREAS, an estimate of the cost of constructing said public improvements according to said plans and specifications has been submitted and approved by the City in the amount of One Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($1,800,000.00). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Subdivider, for itself and his successors in interest, an obligation the burden of which encumbers and runs with the land, agrees to comply with all of the terms, conditions and requirements of the Tentative Map Resolution; to do and perform or cause to be done and performed, at its own expense, without cost to city, in a good and workmanlike manner, under the direction and to the satisfaction and approval of the City Engineer, all of the public improvement and/or land development work required to be done in and adjoining said subdivision, including the improvements described in the above Recitals ("Improvement Work"); and will furnish the necessary materials therefor, all in strict conformity and in accordance with the plans and specifications, which documents have heretofore been filed in the Office of the City Engineer and as described in the above Recitals this reference are incorporated herein and made a part hereof. 2. It is expressly understood and agreed that all monuments have been or will be installed within thirty (30) days after the completion and acceptance of the Improvement Work, and that Subdivider has installed or will install temporary street name signs if permanent street name signs have not been installed. 3. It is expressly understood and agreed that Subdivider will cause all necessary materials to be furnished and all Improvement Work required under the provisions of this contract to be done on or before the second anniversary date of Council approval of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. 4. It is understood and agreed that Subdivider will perform 2- 'l said Improvement Work as set forth hereinabove, or that portion of said Improvement Work serving any buildings or structures ready for occupancy in said subdivision, prior to the issuance of any certificate of clearance for utility connections for said buildings or structures in said subdivision, and such certificate shall not be issued until the city Engineer has certified in writing the completion of said public improvements or the portion thereof serving said building or structures approved by the City; provided, however, that the improvement security shall not be required to cover the provisions of this paragraph. 5. It is expressly understood and agreed to by Subdivider that, in the performance of said Improvement Work, Subdivider will conform to and abide by all of the provisions of the ordinances of the city of Chula Vista, and the laws of the State of California applicable to said work. 6. Subdivider further agrees to furnish and deliver to the City of Chula vista, simultaneously with the execution of this agreement, an approved improvement security from a sufficient surety, whose sufficiency has been approved by the City in the sum of Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($900,000.00) which security shall guarantee the faithful performance of this contract by Subdivider and is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. 7. Subdivider further agrees to furnish and deliver to the City of Chula vista simultaneously with the execution of this agreement, an approved improvement security from a sufficient surety, whose sufficiency has been approved by the City in the sum of Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($900,000.00) to secure the payment of material and labor in connection with the installation of said public improvements, which security is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof and the bond amounts as contained in Exhibit "B", and made a part hereof. 8. Subdivider further agrees to furnish and deliver to the city of Chula vista, simultaneously with the execution of this agreement, an approved improvement security from a sufficient surety, whose sufficiency has been approved by the City in the sum of Five Thousand, Three Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($5,300.00) (per private civil engineer's or land surveyor's estimate) to secure the installation of monuments, which security is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof. 9. It is further agreed that if the Improvement Work is not completed within the time agreed herein, the sums provided by said improvement securities may be used by City for the completion of the Improvement Work within said subdivision in accordance with such specifications herein contained or referred, or at the option of the City, as are approved by the City Council at the time of engaging the work to be performed. Upon certification of completion by the city Engineer and acceptance of said work by City, and after certification by the Director of Finance that all 3- 1//15 costs hereof are fully paid, the whole amount, or any part thereof not required for payment thereof, may be released to Subdivider or its successors in interest, pursuant to the terms of the improvement security. Subdivider agrees to pay to the City any difference between the total costs incurred to perform the work, including design and administration of construction (including a reasonable allocation of overhead), and any proceeds from the improvement security. 10. It is also expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto that in no case will the City of Chula vista, or any department, board or officer thereof, be liable for any portion of the costs and expenses of the work aforesaid, nor shall any officer, his sureties or bondsmen, be liable for the payment of any sum or sums for said work or any materials furnished therefor, except to the limits established by the approved improvement security in accordance with the requirements of the state Subdivision Map Act and the provisions of Title 18 of the Chula vista Municipal Code. 11. It is further understood and agreed by Subdivider that any engineering costs (including plan checking, inspection, materials furnished and other incidental expenses) incurred by City in connection with the approval of the Improvement Work plans and installation of Improvement Work hereinabove provided for, and the cost of street signs and street trees as required by City and approved by the city Engineer shall be paid by Subdivider, and that Subdivider shall deposit, prior to recordation of the Final Map, with city a sum of money sufficient to cover said cost. 12. It is understood and agreed that until such time as all Improvement Work is fully completed and accepted by City, Subdivider will be responsible for the care, maintenance of, and any damage to, the streets, alleys, easements, water and sewer lines within the proposed subdivision. It is further understood and agreed that Subdivider shall guarantee all public improvements for a period of one year from date of final acceptance and correct any and all defects or deficiencies arising during said period as a result of the acts or omission of Subdivider, its agents or employees in the performance of this agreement, and that upon acceptance of the work by City, Subdivider shall grant to City, by appropriate conveyance, the public improvements constructed pursuant to this agreement; provided, however, that said acceptance shall not constitute a waiver of defects by City as set forth hereinabove. 13. It is understood and agreed that City, as indemnitee, or any officer or employee thereof, shall not be liable for any injury to person or property occasioned by reason of the acts or omissions of Subdivider, its agents or employees, or indemnitee, related to this agreement. Subdivider further agrees to protect and hold the City, its officers and employees, harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, liability or loss of any sort, because of or arising out of acts or omissions of Subdivider, its agents or 4- !1jJ~{7 employees, or indemnitee, related to this agreement; provided, however, that the approved improvement security shall not be required to cover the provisions of this paragraph. Such indemnification and agreement to hold harmless shall extend to damages to adj acent or downstream properties or the taking of property from owners of such adjacent or downstream properties as a result of the construction of said subdivision and the public improvements as provided herein. It shall also extend to damages resulting from diversion of waters, change in the volume of flow, modification of the velocity of the water, erosion or siltation, or the modification of the point of discharge as the result of the construction and maintenance of drainage systems. The approval of plans providing for any or all of these conditions shall not constitute the assumption by City of any responsibility for such damage or taking, nor shall City, by said approval, be an insurer or surety for the construction of the subdivision pursuant to said approved improvement plans. The provisions of this paragraph shall become effective upon the execution of this agreement and shall remain in full force and effect for ten (10) years following the acceptance by the City of the improvements. 14. Subdivider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City, advisory agency, appeal board, or legislative body concerning a subdivision, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Section 66499.37 of the Government Code of the State of California. 15. Assignability. Upon request of the Subdivider, any or all on-site duties and obligations set forth herein may be assigned to Subdivider's successor in interest if the City Manager in his/her sole discretion determines that such an assignment will not adversely affect the City's interest. The City Manager in his/her sole discretion may, if such assignment is requested, permit a substitution of securities by the successor in interest in place and stead of the original securities described herein so long as such substituted securities meet the criteria for security as set forth elsewhere in this Agreement. Such assignment will be in a form approved by the City Attorney. IN WITNESS agreement to be forth. WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this executed the day and year first hereinabove set THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBDIVIDER: THE EASTLAKE COMPANY Mayor of the City of Chula vista 5- / ! j. -} employees, or indemnitee, related to this agreement; provided, however, that the approved improvement security shall not be required to cover the provisions of this paragraph. Such indemnification and agreement to hold harmless shall extend to damages to adj acent or downstream properties or the taking of property from owners of such adjacent or downstream properties as a result of the construction of said subdivision and the public improvements as provided herein. It shall also extend to damages resulting from diversion of waters, change in the volume of flow, modification of the velocity of the water, erosion or siltation, or the modification of the point of discharge as the result of the construction and maintenance of drainage systems. The approval of plans providing for any or all of these conditions shall not constitute the assumption by City of any responsibility for such damage or taking, nor shall City, by said approval, be an insurer or surety for the construction of the subdivision pursuant to said approved improvement plans. The provisions of this paragraph shall become effective upon the execution of this agreement and shall remain in full force and effect for ten (10) years following the acceptance by the city of the improvements. 14. Subdivider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, cfficers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the city, advisory agency, appeal board, or legislative body concerning a sUbdivision, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Section 66499.37 of the Government Code of the State of California. 15. Assignability. Upon request of the Subdivider, any or all on-site duties and obligations set forth herein may be assigned to Subdivider's successor in interest if the city Manager in his/her sole discretion determines that such an assignment will not adversely affect the City's interest. The City Manager in his/her sole discretion may, if such assignment is requested, permit a substitution of securities by the successor in interest in place and stead of the original securities described herein so long as such substituted securities meet the criteria for security as set forth elsewhere in this Agreement. Such assignment will be in a form approved by the city Attorney. IN WITNESS agreement to be forth. WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this executed the day and year first hereinabove set 5- IIA - /3 THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Mayor of the City of Chula vista ATTEST City Clerk Approved as to form by city Attorney ~ V' (Attach Notary Acknowledgment) 6- JIA q LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit "A" Improvement Security - Faithful Performance Form: Bond Amount: $900,000.00 Exhibit "B" Improvement Security - Material and Labor: Form: Bond Amount: $900,000.00 Exhibit "C" Improvement Security - Monuments: Form: Bond Amount: $5,300.00 Securities approved as to form and amount by City Attorney Improvement Completion Date: Two (2) years from date of city Council approval of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. H:\home\attorney\sia\Eastlake Trails North TNl & 2 7- I ,'J1 r...... / /r - /:; STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) 88. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) On this Jilfl, day of DE e.E/YI BL5R- , 20M, before me, ])6AJ 1:5tf! /11 :5;# J rJl , a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared !VJ L/./ /7'??1. r.: Z;:5~ personally known to me.~.1 roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person~ whose name~e subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that ~he/they executed the same i~er/their authorized capacity(j.llst and that b~er/their signature{s)on the instrument the person(stor the entity upon behalf of which the person(sJ acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ~ /J1- ~ NOTARY PUBLIC (SEAL) ..] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) On this IJ/-1/) day of D~C~86I:.., 20'()(), before me, PEJ1/J 6E ,Ai. 5/PfJ17f , a notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared (! lI,e r S/11 / r# , personally known to me C;!rproved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the ~son~whose name~are su~ribed to the within instrument and acknowled~to me that (~he/they executed the same in ~js.iher/their authorized capacity~ and that bfl:!W.her/their signature{s)on the instrument the person(sJ, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(sY' acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. , Signature ~ 7f/.~ (SEAL) '@ OENISEM. SMtlH 'I I ~""~r/8 I ~~~I I/A ,. I, . - (! RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 99-03, EASTLAKE TRAILS NORTH NEIGHBORHOODS TN-1 AND TN-2 REQUIRING THE EASTLAKE COMPANY TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNFULFILLED CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 19447 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the developer has executed a Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement to satisfy remaining conditions of City Council Resolution No. 19447. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Chula Vista Tract No. 99-03, Eastlake Trails North Neighborhoods TN-1 and TN-2, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by <~'~m Joh . ~eny City Attorney (~. John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works [H\HOMEIATTORNEY\RESQ\ssia EL Trails TN-1 & TN-2 (December 8, 2000 (3: 8pm)] I i (') i (!~. j RECORDING REQUEST BY: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) City Clerk WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 No transfer tax is due as this is a conveyance to a public agency of less than a fee interest for which no cash consideration has been paid or received. Developer Above Space for Recorder's Use SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 99-03 EASTLAKE TRAILS NEIGHBORHOODS TN-1 & TN-2 (Conditions 9, 16, 17, 18, 31, 36, 39,46, 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, 69, 73, 74,78,79, 80, 83, 86, 87c, 89,100,103,106,108,111,114,115,116,118,121,123,124 and 126 of Resolution 19447 for Chula Vista Tract No. 99-03, Eastlake Trails) This Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("Agreement") is made this _day of ,2000, by and between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, California ("City" or "Grantee" for recording purposes only) and THE EASTLAKE COMPANY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ("Developer" or "Grantor"), with reference to the facts set forth below, which recitals constitute a part of this Agreement: RECITALS A. This Agreement concerns and affects certain real property located in Chula Vista, California, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" and as shown on Exhibit "A -1" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property"). The Property is referred to as EastLake Trails Neighborhoods TN-1 & TN-2, Chula Vista Tract No. 99-03. For purposes of this Agreement the term "Project" shall mean "Property". For the purposes of this agreement, "Eastlake Trails Development" shall refer to the Tentative Map for Eastlake Trails C.V.T. 99-03, approved by City Council on May 4, 1999 by Resolution 19447. ,~ Fi //8-2 B. Developer is the owner of the Property. C. Developer has applied for and the City has approved a Tentative Subdivision Map commonly referred to as Chula Vista Tract No. 99-03, Eastlake Trails, ("Tentative Subdivision Map") for the subdivision of the Property. D. The City has adopted Resolution 19447 ("Resolution") pursuant to which it has approved the Tentative Subdivision Map subject to certain conditions as more particularly described in the Resolution. E. City is willing, on the premises, security, terms and conditions herein contained to approve the final map for which Developer has applied ("Final Map") as being in substantial conformance with the Tentative Subdivision Map described in this Agreement. Developer understands that subsequent final maps may be subject to the same conditions. F. The following defined terms shall have the meaning set forth herein, unless otherwise specifically indicated: a. "Complete Construction" means when construction of required improvements has been completed and accepted by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, in exchange for the mutual covenants, terms and conditions herein contained, the parties agree as set forth below. 1. Agreement Applicable to Subsequent Owners. 1.1 Agreement Binding Upon Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors, assigns and interests of the parties as to any or all of the Property until released by the mutual consent of the parties. 1.2 Agreement Runs with the Land. The burden of the covenants contained in this Agreement ("Burden") is for the benefit of the Property and the City, its successors and assigns and any successor in interest thereto. City is deemed the beneficiary of such covenants for and in its own right and for the purposes of protecting the interest of the community and other parties public or private, in whose favor and for whose benefit of such covenants running with the land have been provided without regard to whether City has been, remained or are owners of any particular land or interest therein. If such covenants are breached, the City shall have the right to exercise all rights and remedies and to maintain any actions or suits at law or in equity or other proper proceedings to enforce the curing of such breach to which it or any other beneficiaries of this agreement and the covenants may be entitled. 2 ~ /18-3 a. Developer Release on Guest Builder Assignments. If Developer assigns any portion of the Project, Developer may have the right to obtain a release of any of Developer's obligations under this Agreement, provided Developer obtains the prior written consent of the City to such release. Such assignment shall, however, be subject to this Agreement and the Burden of this Agreement shall remain a covenant running with the land. The City shall not withhold its consent to any such request for a release so long as the assignee acknowledges that the Burden of the Agreement runs with the land, assumes the obligations of the Developer under this Agreement, and demonstrates, to the reasonable satisfaction of the City, its ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement as it relates to the portion of the Project which is being acquired by the Assignee. b. Partial Release of Developer's Assignees. If Developer assigns any portion of the Project subject to the Burden of this Agreement, upon request by the Developer or its assignee, the City shall release the assignee of the Burden of this Agreement as to such assigned portion if such portion has complied with the requirements of this Agreement and such partial release will not, in the opinion of the City, jeopardize the likelihood that the remainder of the Burden will not be completed. c. Implement Mitigation Measures. Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of all mitigation measures pertaining to the Project identified in the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the EastLake Trails/Greens Replanning Program, EIR #97-04. Any such measures not satisfied by a specific condition or by the project design shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. Mitigation Measures shall be monitored via the Mitigation Monitoring Program approved in conjunction with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum. Modification of the sequence of mitigation shall be at the discretion of the Director of Planning and Building should changes in the circumstances warrant such revision. d. Implement Previously Adopted Conditions of Approval Pertinent to Project. Unless otherwise conditioned, comply, remain in compliance and implement, the terms, conditions and provisions, as are applicable to the property which is the subject matter of this Agreement, of 1) a prior Genera~ Development Plan resulting in the current land use designations as shown on the EastLake II General Development Plan, previously approved by City Council Resglution No. 15198; 2) The EastLake Trails Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan:previously approved by Resolution 19275 on November 24, 1998, 3) EastLake II (EastLake I expansion) Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map, previously approved by Ordinance No. 2765 on December 8, 1998 and 4) EastLake Trails Master Tentative Subdivision Map (TSM 99-03) which was approved by Resolution No. 19447 on May 4, 1999. e. Implement the Public Facilities Financing Plan. Developer shall install 3 .f, iJ II B -'-I public facilities in accordance with the EastLake Trails SPA Public Facilities Financing Plan, approved by Resolution No. 19666 as amended or as required by the City Engineer to meet threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista. The City Engineer and Planning and Building Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision. 2. Condition No.9 of Resolution 19447 (ADA Standards). In satisfaction of Condition No.9 of Resolution 19447, the Developer Agrees to construct sidewalk widths and pedestrian ramps on all walkways to meet or exceed the "Americans with Disabilities Act"(ADA) and City Standards. 3. Condition No. 16 of Resolution 19447 (Temporary Turnaround). In satisfaction of Condition No. 16 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to construct a temporary turnaround or street improvements, as determined necessary by the City Engineer and Fire Marshal, at the end of temporarily stubbed streets greater than 150 feet in length (as measured from the nearest centerline intersection). 4. Condition No. 17 of Resolution 19447 (Deceleration Lane). In satisfaction of Condition No. 17 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to provide an interim eastbound deceleration lane along Otay Lakes Road for the entrance to park site (P-3) concurrent with the completion of P-3 if the ultimate south half street improvements for Otay Lakes Road are not completed at that time. 5. Condition No. 18 of Resolution 19447 (Greenbelt Trail Traffic Device). In satisfaction of Condition No. 18 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to provide interim traffic control devices, as required by the City Engineer, to detour pedestrian traffic to the nearest street crossing if signalized pedestrian crossing is not available when the greenbelt trail is completed and connected to Otay Lakes Road and Olympic Parkway. 6. Condition No. 31 of Resolution 19447 (Private Storm Drain Clean Outs). In satisfaction of Condition No. 31 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to designate as private and maintain by a Home Owner's Association all storm drain clean outs carrying private property water and determined by the City to be in areas inaccessible for maintenance equipment. Developerfurther agrees to include in the CC&R's conditions and restrictions to assure proper maintenance. E 7. Condition No. 36 of Resolution 19447 (FEMA). In satisfaction of Condition No. 36 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to request that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) revise the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report for the Salt Creek area influenced by the Eastlake Trails Development, all at its own expense, without any cost to the City, in a good and workmanlike manner, under the direction and to the satisfaction and approval of the City Engineer. Developer further agrees to submit the application on 4 ~ <' 118-5 or before sixty (60) days from the date of City Council approval of this Agreement and to complete said revision within one year from the date of City Council approval of this Agreement. The City Engineer, in his/her sole discretion, may extend the date for completion of the revision up to one (1) year provided that Developer, in the opinion of the City Engineer, has diligently pursued completion of this revision. Developer shall conform to and abide by all of the provisions of the ordinances, standards and policies of the City of Chula Vista, the laws of the State of California and federal law as applicable to said work. 8. Condition No. 39 and 119 of Resolution 19447 (Mitigation Plan). In satisfaction of Condition No. 39 and 119 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to submit a detailed mitigation plan, prior to April 26, 2001, for the creation and enhancement of riparian vegetation within the Salt Creek Corridor, in accordance with the California Department of Fish and Game 1603 Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 5-181-98, as Amended June 7, 2000. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the plan will be subject to approval by the Director of Planning and Building. Developer further agrees that the mitigation plan shall include components addressing performance standards, maintenance requirements (e.g. pest control, weeding, and plant replacement), monitoring, report preparation, perimeter fencing, and signage; and that the wetland mitigation area shall be maintained in accordance with the Wetland Mitigation Plan. Developer shall provide a sales disclosure document advising homebuyers that OS-1 is a protected environmental preserve lot. 9. Condition No. 46 of Resolution 19447 (Erosion). In satisfaction of Condition No. 46 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its agents, officers or employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its agents, officers or employees, related to erosion, siltation or increased flow of drainage resulting from the Eastlake Trails Development. City agrees to reasonably cooperate with the Developer in the defense of any such action, claim or proceeding. 10. Condition No. 57 of Resolution 19447 (Withhold Permits). In partial satisfaction of Condition No. 57 of Resolution 19447, the Developer understands and agrees that the performance of Developer's obligations hereunder is required for the health and safety of the residents of its Project. Therefore Developer agrees: a. That the City may withhold building permits for any and all build[ngs within the Project if anyone of the following occur: i. Regional development threshold limits set by the East, Chula Vista Transportation Phasing Plan, as amended from time to time, have been reached or in order to have the Project comply with the Growth Management Program as may be amended from time to time. 5 i_ ~ //8-;:" II. Traffic volumes, levels of service. public utilities and/or services either exceed the adopted City threshold standards or fail to comply with the then effective Growth Management Ordinance and Growth Management Program and any amendments thereto: Public utilities shall include. but not be limited to, air quality, drainage, sewer and water. iii. The Developer does not comply with the terms of the Reserve Fund Program. b. That the City may withhold building permits for any of the phases of development identified in the PFFP, if the required public facilities, as identified in the PFFP or as amended by the Annual Monitoring Program or otherwise conditioned have not been completed or constructed to satisfaction of the City. c. That, on the condition that City shall promptly notify the Developer of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that the City fully cooperates in the defense, the Developer shall defend, indemnify. and hold harmless the City, and its agents, officers and employees, from any claim. action or proceeding against the City, or its agents. officers or employees. to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by the City, including approvals by its Planning Commission, City Council, or any approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this Project. d. That the City may withhold the issuance of building permits for the Project, should the Developer be determined by the City to be in breach of any of the terms of the Tentative Map Conditions or this Agreement. The City shall provide the Developer of notice of such determination and allow the Developer reasonable time to cure said breach. 11. Condition No. 58 of Resolution 19447 (Indemnification). In satisfaction of Condition No. 58 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its agents, officers, or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by the City, including approval by its Planning Commission, City Councilor any approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision pursuant to Section 66499.37 of the State Map Act provided the City promptly notifies the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that the City fully cooperates in the defense. 12. Condition No. 59 of Resolution 19447 (Cable Television). In satisfaction of Condition No. 59 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to permit all cable television companies franchised by the City of Chula Vista equal opportunity to place conduit to and provide cable television service for each lot or unit within the Tentative Map area. Developer further agrees to grant, by license or easement, and 6 ~ //8-7 for the benefit of, and to be enforceable by, the City of Chula Vista, conditional access to cable television conduit within the properties situated within the final map only to those cable television companies franchised by the City of Chula Vista the condition of such grant being that (a) such access is coordinated with Developer's construction schedule so that it does not delay or impede Developer's construction schedule and does not require the trenches to be reopened to accommodate that placement of such conduits; and (b) any such cable company is and remains in compliance with, and promises to remain in compliance with the terms and conditions of the franchise and with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been, or may from time to time be, issued by the City of Chula Vista. Developer hereby conveys to the City of Chula Vista the authority to enforce said covenant by such remedies as the City determines appropriate, including revocation of said grant upon determination by the City of Chula Vista that they have violated the conditions of grant. 13. Condition No. 60 of Resolution 19447 (No Protest). In satisfaction of Condition No. 60 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to not protest formation of a district for the maintenance of the drainage channel in Salt Creek or for the maintenance of landscaped medians, open space, and parkways along streets within and adjacent to the subdivision. This agreement to not protest shall not be deemed a waiver of the right to challenge the amount of any assessment, which may be imposed due to the addition of these improvements and shall not interfere with the right of any person to vote in a secret ballot election. 14. Condition No. 63 of Resolution 19447 (MSCP). In satisfaction of Condition No. 63 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to participate in a regional or sub- regional multi-species coastal sage scrub conservation plan. The Developerfurther agrees to implement all the remedial measures recommended in the report and plan. 15. Condition No. 64 of Resolution 19447 (Affordable Housing). In satisfaction of Condition No. 64 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to, within 60 days of approval of this Agreement, enter into an agreement or, if applicable, amend it's Agreement with the City to provide affordable housing units as specified in the adopted Eastlake Comprehensive Affordable Housing Program. .:,. 16. Condition No. 69 of Resolution 19447 (Open Space Landscaping). In satisfaction of Condition No. 69 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to Conform to the design elements of the City's Landscape Manual for all landscaping which falls within the maintenance responsibility of the Open Space District. 7 ~~ " !/8r3 16. Condition No. 73 of Resolution 19447 (Public Maintenance Agreement). In satisfaction of Condition No. 73 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to, within 60 days of approval of this Agreement, enter into a maintenance agreement and grant easements as necessary for landscaping maintained by a HOA within City right-of-way or such other areas as required by the City. 17. Condition No. 74 of Resolution 19447 (Private Utilities). In satisfaction of Condition NO.7 4 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to not install privately owned water, reclaimed water, or other utilities crossing any public street and that this shall include the prohibition of the installation of sleeves for future construction of privately owned facilities. The City Engineer may waive this requirement if the following is accomplished: a. The developer enters into an agreement with the City where the developer agrees to the following: 1. Apply for an encroachment permit for installation of the private facilities within the public right-of-way. 2. Maintain membership in an advance notice such as the USA Dig Alert Service. 3. Mark out any private facilities owned by the developer whenever work is performed in the area. 4. The terms of this agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the developer. b. Shutoff devices as determined by the City Engineer are provided at those locations where private facilities traverse public streets 18. Condition No. 78 of Resolution 19447 (Assessment District). In satisfaction of Condition No. 78 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of the Acquisition/Financing Agreement for Assessment District 94-1, CO 94-064, approved by Council Resolution 17483 as said terms and conditions may be applicable to this development. 19. Condition No. 79 of Resolution 19447 (Open Space/R.O.W.). In satisfaction of Condition No. 79 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to design and construct all of the utilities that service open space within the limits of the open space or dedicated City right-of-way. 8 .?, . , JDj;J 1,0 I 20. Condition No. 80 of Resolution 19447 (Open Space Walls). In satisfaction of Condition No. 30 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees that walls which are located within open space shall have owners of adjoining lots sign a statement when purchasing their homes that they are aware that the wall is on Open Space property and that they may not modify or supplement the wall or encroach onto Open Space property. 21. Condition No. 83 of Resolution 19447 (Park Phasing). In satisfaction of Condition No. 83 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to design, construct and dedicate park facilities as prescribed in the following park development phasing program: a. Obtain the necessary City approvals and complete park master plan construction documents prior to approval of the 600th building permit of the Eastlake Trails Development. b. Select contractors, as approved by the Director of Planning and Building, and begin grading and construction of the community park, including all facilities and amenities, prior to the issuance of the 650th building permit of the Eastlake Trails Development. c. All improvements to the community park, as defined by the Approved construction documents, shall be completed to the satisfaction and approval of the Director of Planning and Building prior to the issuance of the 730th building permit of the Eastlake Trails Development. d. Provide maintenance of the completed community park for a period of one-year from the completion of the park to acceptance of the facility by the City. e. Final alignment, design (including signs), width and construction specifications for the greenbelt trail along the east edge of the Salt Creek open space corridor shall be approved by the Planning and Building Director in conjunction with and subject to the development phasing of the overall community park design. f. The Director of Planning and Building may, at his discretion, delay the park development phasing and construction sequence should conditions change to warrant such delay. If, in the opinion of the City, delay is caused by the City, the Developer may be allowed to delay construction of the park. 9 ~ 118 -10 22. Condition No. 86 of Resolution 19447 (Landscape and Irrigation Plan). In satisfaction of Condition No. 86 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to, within 30 days of City Council approval of this agreement, to prepare, submit and obtain approval by the Director of Planning and BUilding for detailed landscape and irrigation plans, including water management guidelines in accordance with the Chula Vista Landscape Manual and Section 11.4, Design Guidelines, of the Eastlake Trails SPA for the associated landscaped areas. Developer further agrees if Poplus species trees are incorporated in the Eastlake Trails Landscape theme, appropriate installation methods acceptable to the Director of Planning and Building shall be prescribed in the landscape improvement plans. 23. Condition No. 87c of Resolution 19447 (Pedestrian Walkway). In satisfaction of Condition No. 87c of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to Complete Construction within one year from the date: of the City Council approval of this agreement, the pedestrian walkway connection from street MM through open space Lot E to Street LL to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. 24. Condition No. 89 of Resolution 19447 (Relocate Utilities). In satisfaction of Condition No. 89 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to relocate at Developer's own expense, the necessary above and underground utilities serving individual homes to accommodate the required street trees with the street tree planting easement if determined necessary by the City Engineer. 25. Condition NO.1 00 of Resolution 19447 ("As-Built"). In satisfaction of Condition No. 100 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to submit "as-built" improvement and grading plans as required by the city Subdivision Manual and to provide the City said plans in digital D.X.F. file format. 26. Condition No.1 03 of Resolution 19447 (NAD 83). In satisfaction of Condition No. 103 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to Tie the boundary of the subdivision to the California System - Zone VI (1983). 27. Condition No. 106 of Resolution 19447 (Notice to Owners). In satisfaction of Condition No. 106 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees that future property owners shall be notified during escrow by a document to be initialized by the owners, and approved by the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building of the maintenance responsibility of the HOA and their estimated annual cost. 28. Condition No. 108 of Resolution 19447 (Water Conservation). In satisfaction of Condition No. 108 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to modify the Eastlake Trails Water Conservation Plan to incorporate all new water conservation policies adopted by the City Council and Further agrees to comply and remain in compliance with said policies once they are adopted. 10 ~ li8 -/i 29. Condition No. 111 of Resolution 19447 (Withhold Permits). In satisfaction of Condition No. 111 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees that the City may withhold building permits for any of the phases of development identified in the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) if the required public facilities, as identified in the PFFP or as amended or otherwise conditioned, have not been completed or constructed to satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building and City Engineer. The property owner may propose changes in the timing and sequencing of the development and the construction of improvements affected. In such cases, the PFFP may be amended as approved by the Director of Planning and Building. 30. Condition No. 114 of Resolution 19447 (Street Sweeping). In satisfaction of Condition No. 114 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to contract with the City's current street sweeping franchisee, or other server approved by the Director of Public Works to provide street sweeping for each phase of development on a frequency and level of service comparable to that provided for similar areas of the City. The developer shall cause street sweeping to commence immediately after the final residence, in each phase, is occupied and shall continue sweeping until such time that the City has accepted the street or sixty days after completion of all punch list items, whichever is shorter. The developer further agrees to provide the City Conservation Coordinator with a copy of the memo requesting street sweeping service, which memo shall include a map of areas to be swept and the date the sweeping will begin. 31. Condition No. 115 of Resolution 19447 (Brush Clearance). In satisfaction of Condition No. 115 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to provide the Initial Cycle of Fire management/brush clearance within lots adjacent to natural open space areas subject to approval by the Fire Marshal and director of Planning and Building. 32. Condition No. 116 of Resolution 19447 (Fire Hydrants). In satisfaction of Condition No. 116 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to install and make operable the hydrants and 20-foot wide fire access roads prior to delivery of combustible building materials. 33. Condition No. 118 of Resolution 19447 (Water). In satisfaction of.Condition No. 118 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to install potable and recycled water infrastructure improvements as prescribed in the Eastlake Trails Sub- area Water Master Plan prepared by John Powell and Associates, September, 1998, including but not limited to the following improvements: a. Provide a letter from OWD confirming that upon completion of the potable and recycled water infrastructure facilities, the Developer shall dedicate the improvements to the Otay Water District. 11 " iI Ii 8.12 b. Extend the existing potable and recycled water mains in Hunte Parkway south to Olympic Parkway, and construct mains in Olympic Parkway from Hunte parkway to the Olympic Training Center. c. Remove the temporary 12" pipeline that crosses the Eastlake Trails project after the water lines prescribed in the Sub-area Water Master Plan are installed. 36. Condition No. 121 of Resolution 19447 (Code Compliance). In satisfaction of Condition No. 121 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Developer further agrees that preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual. 37. Condition No. 123 of Resolution 19447 (Code Compliance). In satisfaction of Condition No. 123 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to pay all applicable fees in accordance with the City Code and Council Policy, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. The Transportation and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees. 2. Signal Participation Fees. 3. All applicable sewer fees, including but not limited to sewer connection fees. 4. SR-125 impact fee. 5. Salt Creek Sewer Basin Fee. 38. Condition No. 124 of Resolution 19447 (Clean Water). In satisfaction of Condition No. 124 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to comply with all relevant Federal, State, and Local regulations; including the Clean Water Act and shall provide all required testing and documentation to demonstrate said compliance as required by the City Engineer. 39. Condition No. 126 of Resolution 19447 (Urban Runoff). In satisfaction of Condition No. 126 of Resolution 19447, the Developer agrees to comply with all applicable regulations established by the United States Environmental'Protection Agency (USEPA) as set forth in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (N.P.D.E.S.) permit requirements for urban runoff and; storm water discharge and any regulations adopted by the City of Chula Vista pursuant to the N.P.D.E.S. regulations or requirements. 12 ~ " 118-13 40. Satisfaction of Conditions. City agrees that the execution of this Agreement constitutes satisfaction or partial satisfaction of Developer's obligation for this Project of Conditions 9,16,17,18,31,36,39,46,57,58,59,60,63,64,69,73,74, 78, 79, 80, 83, 86, 87c, 89, 100, 103, 106, 108, 111, 114, 115, 116, 118, 121, 123, 124 and 126 of Resolution 19447 for the EastLake Trails Project. 41. Unfulfilled Conditions. Developer hereby agrees, unless otherwise conditioned, that Developer shall comply with all unfulfilled conditions of approval of the EastLake Trails, Chula Vista Tract No. 99-03 Tentative Map (adopted by Resolution 19447) and shall remain in compliance with and implement the terms, conditions and provisions of the Resolution. 42. Recording. This Agreement, or an abstract hereof prepared by either or both parties, may be recorded by either party. 43. Assignability. Upon request of the Developer, any or all on-site duties and obligations set forth herein may be assigned to subdivider's successor in interest if the City Manager in his/her sole discretion determines that such an assignment will not adversely affect the City's interest. The City Manager in his/her sole discretion may, if such assignment is requested, permit a substitution of securities by the successor in interest in place and stead of the original securities described herein, so long as such substituted securities meet the criteria for security as set forth elsewhere in this Agreement. Such assignment will be in a form approved by the City Attorney. 44. Building Permits. Developer understands and agrees that the City may withhold the issuance of building permits for the Project, should the Developer be determined by the City to be in breach of any of the terms of this Agreement. The City shall provide the Developer of notice of such determination and allow the Developer with reasonable time to cure said breach. 45. Miscellaneous. a. Notices. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement or by law, any and all notices required or permitted by this Agreement or by law to be served on or delivered to either party shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly served, delivered, and received when personally delivered to the party to, whom it is directed, or in lieu thereof, when three (3) business days have elapsed following deposit in the U.S. mail, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, first-class postage prepaid, addressed to the address indicated in this Agreement. A party may change such address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party. CITY OF CHULA VISTA 13 .-i ~ II 8 - .lLl 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Attn: Director of Public Works Developer: The Eastlake Company 900 Lane Avenue, Suite 100 Chula Vista, California 91914 Attn: Curt Smith A party may change such address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this paragraph. b. Captions. Captions in this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference and do not define, describe or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any of its terms. c. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof. Any prior oral or written representations, agreements, understandings, and/or statements shall be of no force and effect. This Agreement is not intended to supersede or amend any other agreement between the parties unless expressly noted. d. Preparation of Agreement. No inference, assumption or presumption shall be drawn from the fact that a party or his attorney prepared and/or drafted this Agreement. It shall be conclusively presumed that both parties participated equally in the preparation and/or drafting this Agreement. e. Recitals; Exhibits. Any recitals set forth above and exhibits referenced herein are incorporated by reference into this Agreement. f. Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences litigation for the judicial interpretation, reformation, enforcement or rescission hereof,' the prevailing party will be entitled to a judgment against the other for an amount equal to reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred. The "prevailing party" shall be deemed to be the party who is awarded substahtially the relief sought. (NEXT PAGE IS SIGNATURE PAGE) 14 ,f. ~ I/B-15 SIGNATURE PAGE TO SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EASTLAKE TRAILS NEIGHBORHOODS TN-1 & TN-2 CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 99-03 IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE EASTLAKE COMPANY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COM PAN Williarn T. Os rem Its: President By: Mayor of the City of Chula Vista By: ATTEST City Clerk By:j~~ Curt Smith Its: Vice President Approved as to form by City Attorney (Attach Notary Acknowledgment) H:\HOMEIENGINEERILANODEVlTRAILS NORTHITN012FSSIAREVISION6.DOC 15 .$. 11 /'~-Ib STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) Onthis ;t.{C1; day of :DECZ-/YJ~ ,2000, before me, De)III.:5€ # ~/T1-f , a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared j,{) 1LL//T711 -r t!> s~E:/Yl personally known to me (~.] roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the ~sonW' whose name~e subscribed to the within instrument and acknowle~to me that ~heJthey executed the same in ~er/their authorized capacity(j.eS), and that b~er/their signature.wQn the instrument the person{sf, or the entity upon behalf of which the person..{sY . acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ~ ');1. ~ NOTARY PUBLIC (SEAL) .1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) On this / if!; day of DECMU-te.-- , 20..&2, before me, DEAk-se: /fl. :5?1 / rJ/ , a notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared (! I{,e T ~<>/?1 / 77-1 , personally known to me ~.. roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the Mon~ whose name~are s~ribed to the within instrument and acknowledgp;yo me that ~he/they executed the same in ~er/their authorized capacityQes), and that by~er/their signatureWon the instrument the person~ or the entity upon behalf of which the person~ acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ~ '711. S~ (SEAL) I ~ _U.","" I B ~rt,,= g J ~~~1 1/13-17 Exhibit "A" Legal Description Exhibit "A-1" Plat of Property List of Exhibits 16 ,i fi Ii,!':; I'"" "!?-,.':"J ,-" EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STAGE OF CALIFORNLA., COUNTY OF SA~ DIEGO, ."-'\1) IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; LOTS I THROUGH 73; TOGETHER WITH LOTS "A" THROUGH "D" OF MAP No. FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; ON f;" /II ~ /I ~~!9 ~:':::=3IT ". -- ;;:===:::.----------=- -=-:- \ t --- . -----::. '" !'" '" ro, m " " ." :< " ~ " " " ~I-:: ,.: I - I' / .:,/ I ~ .~ i 0 Ii j fi 'I I J':---.... ~ '~/f - /Jr') ") ! J: i::> ..:-0 . 0 :1 ~ 0 ~ . ......./ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; 0 : COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item / ~' Meeting Date: 12/19/00 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Accepting Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program for the period of October 1, 2000 through September 30, 2001 for City of Chula Vista projects utilizing Federal Highway Administration funding SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works~.~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager 5/6 (4/Sths Vote: Yes No X ) All local agencies receiving Federally-assisted funds from the Federal Highway Administration are required to submit a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program. The Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program is designed to allow contractors/consultants owned and controlled by minorities, women and other socially and economically disadvantaged persons to have the opportunity to bid and work on projects funded by the Federal Highway Administration. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution accepting the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program for the period of October I, 2000 through September 30, 200l for City of Chula Vista projects utilizing Federal Highway Administration funding. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: General The Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program is a federal program operating under the guidance of the United States Department of Transportation (DOT). A new Federal regulation, Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 26 (49 CFR 26), which governs the DBE Program became effective March 4, 1999. 49 CFR 26 replaces Part 23 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations as the final rule binding all local agencies DOT assisted contracts. Caltrans has been entrusted with local agency oversight responsibility for DBE implementation and shall administer the Federal-aid highway funds from Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) programs. City staff has worked closely with Caltrans in preparing this program. The overall goal of the DBE Program is to ensure that contractors/consultants owned and controlled by minorities, women and other socially and economically disadvantaged persons have the opportunity to bid and work on projects funded by FHWA. Page 2, Item Meeting Date 12/19/00 It will be the policy of the City of Chula Vista to ensure that DBE's have an equal opportunity to receive and participate on DOT funded projects. It will be the DBE Programs goal to accomplish the following: 1. To ensure non-discrimination in the award and administration of DOT assisted contracts; 2. To create a level playing field on which DBE's can compete fairly for DOT assisted contracts; 3. To ensure that the DBE Program is narrowly tailored in accordance with applicable law; 4. To ensure that only firms that fully meet 49 CFR 26 eligibility standards are permitted to participate as DBE's; 5. To help remove barriers for the participation of DBE's in DOT assisted contracts; and 6. To assist the development of firms to compete successfully in the market place outside the DBE Program. City of Chula Vista DBE Program Overall Goal As part of the DBE Program, the City of Chula Vista is required to calculate an overall percentage of DBE participation in DOT assisted contracts. The overall goal is defined as a percentage of DBE participation on all Federal-aid highway funds expended on FHWA assisted contracts in the forthcoming fiscal year. The City of Chula Vista's base figure was calculated to be 8.4 %. The overall goal methodology is a two-step process as described in 49 CFR 26. Step l is to determine a base figure percentage. The base figure was determined by researching the availability of DBE's that are ready, willing and able to participate in the Federal-aid contracting programs divided by the number of firms available in San Diego. Certified DBE's figures were determined using Caltrans databases. The number of all ready, willing and able firms located in the San Diego area wag determined using the Census Bureau's County Business Pattern Database. Once a base percentage figure was determined, Step 2 consisted of adjusting the overall goal either up or down based on the availability of DBE's in the local market. Based on relevant upcoming City of Chula Vista DOT assisted projects and the availability of DBE's to participate on those projects, the overall goal was adjusted up to 13.4%. Therefore, it is the City's annual goal to attain a 13.4% participation of DBE's on the City ofChula Vista's DOT assisted contracts. In accordance with 49 CFR 26, the City of Chula Vista will include language in the contract specifications, encouraging DBE's to bid on DOT federally assisted projects in order to meet our goal of 13.4% DBE participation. Page 3, Item ! ~' Meeting Date 12/19/00 Each local agency must appoint a DBE liaison officer who shall have direct independent access to the Director of Public Works concerning DBE program matters. Ben Hen-era, Project Design and Management Section of the Engineering Division has been designated the DBE liaison officer and is responsible for implementing all aspects of the DBE program as stated in Section VI of the DBE Program. The DBE Programs overall annual goal was advertised for thirty (30) days through a Public Notice, to women/minority focused media, local trade papers and the Star News announcing the City's proposed overall annual goals. A forty-five (45) day period was allowed to provide comment from the date of the Public Notice. During the Public Notice period, no comments were made regarding the DBE Program. Title 49 CFR 26 requires the local agencies governing body to approve the DBE Program before Federal assisted projects can be utilized. FISCAL IMPACT: The costs ofmanaging and maintaining theDBE program will become part of the costs of Federal Highway projects and included in reimbursements from FHWA programs. Thus, there is no overall impact to the City for this program other than the initial staff costs to prepare this policy. File No. 0735-10-LY-072 BVH:bvh H:\HOME\ENGINEER~AGENDA\DBEAI I3BVIt.doc 12/13/2000 4:32:20 PM RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM FOR THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1, 2000 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 FOR CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROJECTS UTILIZING FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FUNDING WHEREAS, all local agencies receiving Federally-assisted funds from the Federal Highway Administration are required to submit a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program; and WHEREAS, the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program is designed to allow contractors/consultants owned and controlled by minorities, women and other socially and economically disadvantaged persons to have the opportunity to bid and work on projects funded by the Federal Highway Administration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby accept Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program for the period of October 1, 2000 through September 30, 2001 for City of Chula vista projects utilizing Federal Highway Administration funding as set forth in Attachment A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. Presented by Approved as to form by ~ John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works [H:\HOME\ATTORNEY\RESO\ DBE Program (December 14, 2000 (10:32am)] /~ _ il ATTACHMENT A City of Chula Vista ~ (f?. ~ / ~ _- 'Ib.... -_ - -"""- ~~ ~- ~- CllY OF CHULA VISfA DISADV ANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM This Program is in accordance with Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 26, " .. Page t /.z / 5 December 12, 2000 City of Chula Vista DRAFT DISADV ANT AGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I. Definitions of Terms The terms used in this program have the meanings defined in 49 CFR !l26.5. II. Objectives /Policy Statement (!l!l26.1,26.23) The City of Chula Vista has established a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DB E) program in accordance with regulations of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), 49 CFR Part 26. The City of Chula Vista has received Federal financial assistance from the DOT, and as a condition of receiving this assistance, the City of Chula Vista will sign an assurance that it will comply with 49 CFR Part 26. It is the policy of the City ofChula Vista to ensure that DBEs, as defined in part 26, have an equal opportunity to receive and participate in DOT-assisted contracts. It is also our policy: To ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts; To create a level playing field on which DBEs can compete fairly for DOT- assisted contracts; To ensure that the DBE Program is narrowly tailored in accordance with applicable law; To ensure that only firms that fully meet 49 CFR Part 26 eligibility standards are permitted to participate as DBEs; To help remove barriers to the participation of DBEs in DOT-assisted contracts; and To assist the development of firms that can compete successfully in the market place outside the DBE Program. Ben Herrera, Assistant Engineer II has been delegated as the DBE Liaison Officer. In that capacity, Ben Herrera is responsible for implementing all aspects of the DBE program. Implementation of the DBE program is accorded the same priority as compliance with all other legal obligations incurred by the City of Chula Vista in its fmancial assistance agreements with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The City of ChuIa Vista has disseminated this policy statement to the Chula Vista City Council and all the components of our organization. We have distributed this statement to DBE and non-DBE business communities that perform work for us on DOT-assisted iJ Page 2 /), - (p December 12, 2000 City of Chula Vista contracts by publishing this statement in general circulation, minority-focused and trade association publications. III. Nondiscrimination (S26.7) The City of Chula Vista will never exclude any person from participation in, deny any person the benefits of, or otherwise discriminate against anyone in connection with the award and performance of any contract covered by 49 CFR Part 26 on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin. In administering its DBE program, the City of Chula Vista will not, directly or through contractual or other arrangements, use criteria or methods of administration that have the effect of defeating or substantially impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the DBE program with respect to individuals of a particular race, color, sex, or national ongm. IV. DBE Program Updates (S26.21) The City of Chula Vista will continue to carry out this program until the City of ChuIa Vista has established a new goal setting methodology or until significant changes to this DBE Progranl are adopted. The City of ChuIa Vista will provide to Caltrans a proposed overall goal and goal setting methodology and other program updates by June 1 of every year. V. Quotas (S26.43) The City of Chula Vista will not use quotas or set aside in any way in the administration of this DBE program. VI. DBE Liaison Officer (DBELO) (S26.45) The City of Chula Vista has designated tl1e following individual as the DBE Liaison Officer: Ben Herrera, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, (619) 585-5602, bherrera(QJci.chula-vista.ca.us. In tl1at capacity, Ben Herrera is responsible for implementing all aspects of the DBE program and ensuring tl1at tl1e City of Chula Vista complies with all provisions of 49 CFR Part 26. This is available on the'Internet at osdbuweb.dot.gov/main.cfm. Ben Herrera has direct, independent access to tl1e Director of Public of Works, John P. Lippitt, concerning DBE program matters. Ben Herrera will have available from the City such administrative and legal assistance as required. The organization chart displaying tl1e DBELO's position in tl1e organization is found in Attachment 1 to this program. The DBELO is responsible for developing, inlplementing and monitoring the DBE program, in coordination otl1er appropriate officials. Duties and responsibilities include tl1e following: I"f i Page 3 December 12, 2000 /.), - 7 City of Chula Vista I. Gathers and reports statistical data and other information as required. 2. Reviews third party contracts and purchase requisitions for compliance with this program. 3. Works with all departments to set overall annual goals. 4. Ensures that bid notices and requests for proposals are available to DBEs in a timely manner. 5. Identifies contracts and procurements so that DBE goals are included in solicitations (both race-neutral methods and contract specific goals) and monitors results. 6. Analyzes City of Chula Vista's progress toward goal attainment and identifies ways to improve progress. 7. Participates in pre-bid meetings. 8. Advises the City Manager and City Council on DBE matters and achievement. 9. Chairs the DBE Advisory Committee. 10. Participates with the legal counsel and project director to determine contractor compliance with good faith efforts. II. Provides DBEs with information and assistance in preparing bids, obtaining bonding and insurance. 12. Plans and participates in DBE training seminars. 13. Provides outreach to DBEs and community organizations to advise them of opportunities. VII. Federal Financial Assistance Agreement Assurance (!l26.13) The City of Chula Vista will sign the following assurance, applicable to all FHW A- assisted contracts and their administration as part of the program supplement agreement for each project: The recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any DOT -assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE Program or the requirements of 49 CFR part 26. The recipient shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. The recipient's DBE Program, as required by 49 CFR part 26 and as approved by DOT, is incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the recipient of its failure to carry out its approved program, the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.). VIII. DBE Financial Institutions It is the policy of the City of Chula Vista to investigate the full extent of services offered by fmancial institutions owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals in the community, to make reasonable efforts to use these f7 .. Page 4 December 12, 2000 /, /7 ~. "C. City of Chula Vista institutions, and to encourage prime contractors on DOT -assisted contracts to make use of these institutions. Information on the availability of such institutions can be obtained from the DBE Liaison Officer. The Caltrans Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program may offer assistance to the DBE Liaison Officer. IX. Directory (926.31) The City of Chula Vista will refer interested persons to the DBE directory available from the Caltrans Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program website at www.dot.ca.govlhqlbep. X. Overconcentration (926.33) The City of Chula Vista has not identified any types of work in DOT-assisted contracts that have a overconcentration of DBE participation. If in the future the City of Chula Vista identifies the need to address overconcentration, measures for addressing overconcentration will be submitted to the DLAE for approval. XI. Business Development Programs (926.35) The City of Chula Vista does not have a business development or mentor-protege program. If the City of Chula Vista identifies the need for such a program in the future, the rationale for adopting such a program and a comprehensive description of it will be submitted to the DLAE for approval. XII. Required Contract Clauses (9926.13,26.29) Contract Assurance The City of Chula Vista ensures that the following clause is placed in every DOT -assisted contract and subcontract: The contractor or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the award and administration of DOT- assisted contracts. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as recipient deems appropriate. Prompt Payment The City of Chula Vista ensures that the following clauses or equivalent will be included in each DOT-assisted prime contract: Ii iI Page 5 December 12,2000 ,--/..<.9 City of Chula Vista Satisfactory Performance The prime contractor agrees to pay each subcontractor under this prime contract for satisfactory performance of its contract no later than 10 days from the receipt of each payment the prime contractor receives from the City of Chula Vista. Any delay or postponement of payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good cause following written approval of the City of Chula Vista. This clause applies to both DBE and non-DBE subcontractors Release of Retainage The prime contractor agrees further to release retainage payments to each subcontractor within 30 days after the subcontractor's work is satisfactorily completed. Any delay or postponement of payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good cause following written approval of the City of Chula Vista. This clause applies to both DBE and non-DBE subcontractors. XIII. Monitoring and Enforcement Mechanisms (S26.37) The City of Chula Vista will assign a Resident Engineer (RE) or Contract Manager to monitor and track actual DBE participation through contractor and subcontractor reports of payments in accordance with the following: After Contract Award After the contract award the City of Chula Vista will review the award documents for the portion of items each DBE and first tier subcontractor will be performing and the dollar value of that work. With these documents the RE/Contract Manager will be able to determine the work to be performed by the DBEs or subcontractors listed. Pre-construction Conference A pre-construction conference will be scheduled between the RE and the contractor or their representative to discuss the work DBE subcontractors will perform. Before work can begin on a subcontract, the local agency will require the contractor to submit a completed "Subcontracting Request," Exhibit I6-B of the LAPM or equivalent. When the RE receives the completed form it will be checked for agreement of the first tier subcontractors and DBEs. The RE will not approve the request when it identifies someone other than the DBE or first tier subcontractor listed in the previously completed "Local Agency Bidder DBE Information," Exhibit I5-G. The "Subcontracting Request" will not be approved until any discrepancies are resolved. If an issue cannot be resolved at that time, or there is some other concern, the RE will require the contractor to eliminate the subcontractor in question before signing the subcontracting request. A change in the DBE or first tier subcontractor may be addressed during a substitution process at a later date. 1; " Page 6 December 12, 2000 . )~ - /0 City of Chula Vista Suppliers, vendors, or manufacturers listed on the "Local Agency Bidder DBE Information" \\~ll be compared to those listed in the completed Exhibit 16-1 of the LAPM or equivalent. Either making corrections or requesting a substitution must resolve differences. Substitutions will be subject to the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act (FP A). Local agencies will require contractors to adhere to the provisions within Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act (State Law) Sections 4100-4144. FPA requires the contractor to list all subcontractors in excess of one half of one percent (0.5%) of the contractor's total bid or $10,000, whichever is greater. The statute is designed to prevent bid shopping by contractors. The FP A explains that a contractor may not substitute a subcontractor listed in the original bid except ~th the approval of the awarding authority. The RE ~ll give the contractor a blank Exhibit 17-F, "Final Report Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises, First Tier Subcontractors" and will explain to them that the document will be required at the end of the project, for which payment can be withheld, in conformance with the contract. Construction Contract Monitoring The RE will ensure that the RE's staff (inspectors) knows what items of work each DBE is responsible for performing. Inspectors will notify the RE immediately of apparent violations. When a firm other than the listed DBE subcontractor is found performing the work, the RE will notify the contractor of the apparent discrepancy and potential loss of payment. Based on the contractor's response, the RE will take appropriate action: The DBE Liaison Officer will perform a preliminary investigation to identify any potential issues related to the DBE subcontractor performing a commercially useful function. Any substantive issues ~ll be forwarded to the Caltrans Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program. If the contractor fails to adequately explain why there is a discrepancy, payment for the work ~ll be ~thheld and a letter ~ll be sent to the contractor referencing the applicable specification violation and the required ~thholding of payment. If the contract requires the submittal of a monthly truck document, the contractor will be required to submit documentation to the RE showing the owner's name; California Highway Patrol CA number; and the DBE certification number of the owner of the truck for each truck used during that month,for which DBE participation ~ll be claimed. The trucks will be listed by California Highway Patrol CA number in the daily diary or on a separate piece of paper for documentation. The numbers are checked by inspectors regularly to confirm compliance. j Page 7 December 12, 2000 - /~ -./1 City of Chula Vista Providing evidence ofDBE payment is the responsibility of the contractor. Substitution When a DBE substitution is requested, the RE/Contract Manager will request a letter from the contractor explaining why substitution is needed. The RE/Contract Manager must review the letter to be sure names and addresses are shown, dollar values are included, and reason for the request is explained. If the RE/Contract Manager agrees to the substitution, the RE/Contract Manager will notifY, in writing, the DBE subcontractor regarding the proposed substitution and procedure for written objection from the DBE subcontractor in accordance with the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act. If the contractor is not meeting the contract goal with this substitution, the contractor must provide the required good faith effort to the RE/Contract Manager for local agency consideration. If there is any doubt in the RE/Contract Manager's mind regarding the requested substitution, the RE/Contract Manager may contact the DLAE for assistance and direction. Record Keeping and Final Report Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises The contractor shall maintain records showing the name and address of each first-tier subcontractor. The records shall also show: I. The name and business address, regardless of tier, of every DBE subcontractor, DBE vendor of materials and DBE trucking company. 2. The date of payment and the total dollar figure paid to each of the firms. 3. The DBE prime contractor shall also show the date of work performed by their own forces along with the corresponding dollar value of the work claimed toward DBE goals. When a contract has been completed the contractor will provide a summary of the records stated above. The DBE utilization information will be documented on Exhibit 17-F and will be submitted to the DLAE attached to the Report of Expenditures. The RE will compare the completed Exhibit 17~F to the contractor's completed Exhibit 15-G and, if applicable, to the completed Exhibit 16-B. The DBEs shown on the completed Exhibit 17-F should be the same as those originally listed unless an authorized substitution was allowed, or the contractor used more DBEs and they were added. The dollar amount should reflect any changes made in planned work done by the DBE. The contractor will be required to explain in writing why the names of the subcontractors, the work items or dollar figures are different from what was originally shown on the completed Exhibit 15- G when: . There have been no changes made by the RE. · The contractor has not provided a sufficient explanation in the comments section of the completed E~bit 17-F. " Page 8 December 12, 2000 /.J..'/~ City of Chula Vista The explanation will be attached to the completed Exhibit 17-F for submittal. The RE will file this in the project records. The local agency's Liaison Officer will keep track of the DBE certification status on the Internet at www.dot.ca.govlhqlbep and keep the RE informed of changes that affect the contract. The RE will require the contractor to act in accordance with existing contractual commitments regardless of decertification. The DLAE will use the PS&E checklist to monitor the City ofChula Vista's commitment to require bidders list information to be submitted to the City of Chula Vista from the awarded prime and subcontractors as a means to develop a bidders list. This monitoring will only take place if the bidders list information is required to be submitted as stipulated in the special provisions. The City of Chula Vista will bring to the attention of the DOT through the DLAE any false, fraudulent, or dishonest conduct in connection with the program, so that DOT can take the steps (e.g., referral to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution, referral to the DOT Inspector General, action under suspension and debarment or Program Fraud and Civil Penalties rules) provided in 926.109. The City of Chula Vista also will consider similar action under our own legal authorities, including responsibility determinations in future contracts. XIV. Overall Goals (926.45) Amount of Goal The City of Chula Vista's overall goal for the Federal fiscal year FY 2000/2001 is the following: 8.4% of the Federal financial assistance in FHW A-assisted contracts. This overall goal is broken down into 6% race-conscious and 2.4% race-neutral components. Methodology The methodology followed in setting the overall goal is enclosed as Attachment 2. Process Starting with the Federal fiscal year 2002, the amount of overall goal, the method to calculate the goal, and the breakout of estimated race-neutral and race-conscious participation will be required annually by June I in advance of the Federal fiscal year beginning October I for FHW A-assisted contracts. Submittals will be to the Caltrans' DLAE. An exception to this will be if FT A or FAA recipients are required by FT A or FAA to submit the annual information to them or a designee by another date. FHW A recipients will follow this process: Once the DLAE has responded with preliminary comments and the comments have been incorporated into the draft overall goal information, the City of Chula Vista will publish a " Page 9 December 12, 2000 - /-2 - / S City of Chula Vista notice of the proposed overall goal, informing the public that the proposed goal and its rationale are available for inspection during normal business hours at the City of Chula Vista's principal office for 30 days following the date of the notice, and informing the public that the City of Chula Vista comments will be accepted on the goals for 45 days following the date of the notice. Advertisements in newspapers, minority focus media, trade publications, and websites will be the normal media to accomplish this effort. Thc notice will include addresses to which comments may be sent and addresses (including offices and websites) where the proposal may be reviewed. The overall goal resubmission to the Caltrans DLAE, will include a summary of information and comments received during this public participation process and the City of Chula Vista's responses. This will be due by September I to the Caltrans DLAE. The DLAE will have a month to make a final review so the City of Chula Vista may begin using the overall goal on October I of each year. XV. Contract Goals (926.51) The City of Chula Vista will use contract goals to meet any portion of the overall goal. The City of Chula Vista does not project being able to meet by the use of race-neutral means. Contract goals are established so that, over the period to which the overall goal applies, they will cumulatively result in meeting any portion of the overall goal that is not projected to be met through the use of race-neutral means. Contract goals will be established only on those DOT -assisted contracts that have subcontracting possibilities. Contract goals need not be established on every such contract, and the size of contract goals will be adapted to the circumstances of each such contract (e.g., type and location of work, availability of DBEs to perform the particular type of work). The contract work items will be compared with eligible DBE contractors willing to work on the project. A determination will also be made to decide which items are likely to be performed by the prime contractor and which ones are likely to be performed by the subcontractor(s). The goal will then be incorporated into the contract documents. Contract goals will be expressed as a percentage of the total amount of a DOT-assisted contract. XVI. Transit Vehicle Manufacturers (926.49) If DOT-assisted contracts will include transit vehicle procurements, the City of Chula Vista will require each transit vehicle manufacturer, as a condition of being authorized to bid or propose on transit vehicle procurements, to certify that it has complied with the requirements of 49 CFR Part 26, Section 49. The City of Chula Vista will direct the transit vehicle manufacturer to the subject requirements located on the Internet at http://osdbuweb.dot.gov/programs/dbe/dbe.htm. XVII. Good Faith Efforts (926.53) Information to be Submitted ~ Page 10 n /.z It December 12,2000 City of Chula Vista The City of Chula Vista treats bidders'/offerors' compliance with good faith effort requirements as a matter of responsiveness. A responsive proposal is meeting all the requirements of the advertisement and solicitation. Each solicitation for which a contract goal has been established will require the bidders/offerors to submit the following information to the City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 no later than 4:00 p.m. on or before the fourth day, not including Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, following bid opening: I. The names and addresses of known DBE firms that will participate in the contract: 2. A description of the work that each DBE will perform: 3. The dollar amount of the participation of each DBE firm participation 4. Written and signed documentation of commitment to use a DBE subcontractor whose participation it submits to meet a contract goal; 5. Written and signed confirmation from the DBE that it is participating in the contract as provided in the prime contractor's commitment; and 6. If the contract goal is not met, evidence of good faith efforts. Demonstration of Good Faith Efforts The obligation of the bidder/offeror is to make good faith efforts. The bidder/offeror can demonstrate that it has done so either by meeting the contract goal or documenting good faith efforts. The following personnel are responsible for determining whether a bidder/offeror who has not met the contract goal has documented sufficient good faith efforts to be regarded as responsive: Ben Herrera, Project Design and Management. The City of Chula Vista will ensure that all information is complete and accurate and adequately documents the bidder/offeror's good faith efforts before a commitment to the performance of the contract by the bidder/offeror is made. Administrative Reconsideration Within 10 days of being informed by the City of Chula Vista that it is not responsive because it has not documented sufficient good faith efforts, a bidder/offeror may request administrative reconsideration. Bidder/offerors should make this request in writing to the following reconsideration official: John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works. The reconsideration official will not have played any role in the original determination that the bidder/offeror did not make document sufficient good faith efforts. As part of this reconsideration, the bidder/offeror will have the opportunity to provide written documentation or argument concerning the issue of whether it met the goal or made adequate good faith efforts to do so. The bidder/offeror will have the opportunity to meet in person with the reconsideration official to discuss the issue of whether it met . rf ~ Page 11 December 12, 2000 j,< /5 City of Chula Vista the goal or made adequate good faith efforts to do. The City of Chula Vista will send the bidder/offeror a written decision on reconsideration, explaining the basis for finding that the bidder did or did not meet the goal or make adequate good faith efforts to do so. The result of the reconsideration process is not administratively appealable to Caltrans. FHW A or the DOT. Good Faith Efforts when a DBE is Replaced on a Contract The City of Chula Vista will require a contractor to make good faith efforts to replace a DBE that is terminated or has otherwise failed to complete its work on a contract with another certified DBE, to the extent needed to meet the contract goal. The prime contractor is required to notify the RE immediately of the DBE's inability or unwillingness to perform and provide reasonable documentation. In this situation, the prime contractor will be required to obtain the City of Chula Vista prior approval of the substitute DBE and to provide copies of new or amended subcontracts, or documentation of good faith efforts. If the contractor fails or refuses to comply in the time specified, the City of Chula Vista contracting office will issue an order stopping all or part of payment/work until satisfactory action has been taken. If the contractor still fails to comply, the contracting officer may issue a termination for default proceeding. XVIII. Counting DBE Participation (S26.55) The City of Chula Vista will count DBE participation toward overall and contract goals as provided in the contract specifications for the prime contractor, subcontractor, joint venture partner with prime or subcontractor, or vendor of material or supplies. XIX. Certification (S26.83(a)) The City of Chula Vista ensures that only DBE firms currently certified on the Caltrans' directory will participate as DBEs in our program. XX. Information Collection and Reporting Bidders List The City of Chula Vista will create and maintain a bidders list, consisting of information about all DBE and non-DBE firms that bid or quote on its DOT-assisted contracts. The bidders list will include the name, address, DBE/non-DBE status, age, and annual gross receipts of firms. Monitoring Payments to DBEs Prime contractors are required to maintain records and documents of payments to DBEs for three years following the performance of the contract. Any authorized representative & ji Page 12 December 12, 2000 _ d /.),-/f; City of Chula Vista of the City of Chula Vista, Caltrans or FHWA will make these records available for inspection upon request. This reporting requirement also extends to any certified DBE subcontractor. Payments to DBE subcontractors will be reviewed by the City of Chula Vista to ensure that the actual amount paid to DBE subcontractors equals or exceeds the dollar amounts stated in the schedule of DBE participation. Reporting to Caltrans The City of Chula Vista - Final utilization of DBE participation will be reported to the DLAE using Exhibit l7-F of the Caltrans' LAPM. Confidentialitv The City of Chula Vista will safeguard from disclosure to third parties information that may reasonably be regarded as confidential business information, consistent with Federal, state, and local laws. .Iohn P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works Date: This Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Program is accepted by: Gary L. Vettese, P .E., District Local Assistance Engineer Date: Bvh C:\ben\dbe\dbeprogram.doc ''1. " Page 13 December 12, 2000 u /<><. / '1 ~Vt- -..- ~--- ---- '~~~~ CllY OF CHULA VISTA ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF CHULA VISTA ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Jolm P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works---+ Clifford 1. Swanson, City Engineer/Deputy Director of Public Works---+ Samir Nuhaily, Senior Civil Engineer---+ James Holmes, Civil Engineer ---+ Greg Tscherch, EEO Officer Roberto Solorzano, Labor Compliance Officer Merce LeClair, Admin Office Specialist Ben Herrera, DBE Liaison Officer ~ i . .. /c)- / (, ATTACHMENT 2 DRAFT DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS PROGRAM (DBE) FOR THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA METHODOLOGY I. The number of available and willing DBE's in the San Diego area and the total number of available and willing firms located in the San Diego area was prepared by SANDAG FROM Caltrans database and the 1997 Census Bureau's County Business Pattern Database. The list included all SIC/WCC codes for which DBE firms are certified. (list attached) 2. Step I: Overall Goal Calculation This list was then reduced to only those classifications, which were likely to be used on City of Chula Vista DOT assisted projects. These SIC/WWC codes utilized in the calculation of the overall goal are attached. Per the attached table, 1,293 available DBE's were divided by the 15,193 available firms in San Diego to yield an Overall Goal of 8.4%. 1.293 Available DBE Firms = 8.4% 15,193 Available Firms in San Diego 3. The DBE participation rate for DOT funded projects within the past three Fiscal years was set at 15%. This figure was adopted in previous FY based on CAL TRANS recommendation. This figure was not based on any calculation or participation of DBE Firms in previous federally assisted funded projects. 4. Step 2: Overall Goal Adjustment Based on cost estimates of upcoming City of Chula Vista Projects, the overall goal was adjusted up to 12%. For the period of October I, 2000 to September 30, 2001, the City of Chula Vista will have six (6) DOT assisted projects. Based on the availability of DBE's for each project, a percentage of DBE participation was calculated for each project. Each projects percentage was then multiplied by the weighted average of each project based on the overall amount of federally assisted funds. Proiects Palomar Street Improvements Pavement Rehab Program Protective!Permissive Signals Minor Signal Modification ProtectivelPennissive Signals Central Controlffraffic Comm. Total Total Dollars $1,700,000 $6,000,000 $ 187,000 $ 112,000 $ 126,816 $ 400.000 $8,595,816 DBE Participation. % 12.9 14.3 7.7 7.7 7.7 8.9 Weighted Cost % 19.8 69.8 2.1 1.5 1.3 5.5 Adjusted Base Figure ~ 0.i29(.198) + 0.143(.698) + 0.077(.021) + 0.077(.015) + 0.077(.013) + 0.089(.055) = 13.4 % Ii: r /b< ' /9 5. Of the overall annual goal of 13.4% for DBE participation, the City of Chula Vista projects 10% of the goal utilizing race-neutral methods, including making efforts to assure that bidding and contract requirements facilitate participation by DBEs and other small businesses; unbundling-large contracts to make them more accessible to small businesses; encouraging prime contractors to subcontract portions of the work that they might otherwise perform themselves; and providing technical assistance and other services to facilitate consideration of DBEs and others small businesses. The remaining 3.4% of the goal is anticipated to be accomplished through race-conscious measures, which includes establishing contract specific goals on contracts with contracting possibilities, when needed, to meet the City of Chula Vista's overall annual DBE goal. 6. In conformance with Public Participation Regulatory requirements of 49 CFR Part 26.45 and Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM), Chapter 9, this goal analysis has been reviewed with minority, women, local business chambers, community organizations, and other U.S. DOT recipients. These entities are knowledgeable about the availability of disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged businesses and the effects of discrimination on contracting opportunities for DBEs within the Authority's marketplace. Additionally, the City of Chula Vista has published a Public Note in general circulation media, announcing the City of Chula Vista proposed overall annual goals for the FY 2000/2001 contracts assisted by FHWA. Such Notice informed the public that the proposed goals and their rational were available for inspection at the City of Chula Vista during normal business hours for 30 days following the date of the Public Notice and, that the City of Chula Vista and FHW A will accept comments on the goals for 45 days from the date of the Public Notice. The required public participation provisions will be fully satisfied prior to submitting the City of Chula Vista's DBE Program and Overall Annual DBE Goal for Final Review and Approval. Bvh C:\dbe/draftdbemethodology .doc iT fi -..4 JO ~~f? ~ ~~~~ -- ~~ ellY OF CHUlA VISfA- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, the City of Chula Vista has established an Overall Annual Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Goal, applicable to contracting opportunities scheduled to be awarded during the period of October 1, 2000 through September 30, 2001. The City of Chula Vista proposed Overall Annual Goal and its rationale were developed in response to U.S. Department of Transportation's New Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Final rule (49 CFD Part 26) and are available for inspection for thirty (30) days following the date of this Notice, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Pacific Standard Time, Monday through Friday at our principal place of business located at: City of Chula Vista Project Design and Management 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 \vww.ci.chula-vista.ca. us Comments will be accepted on the Goal for forty-five (45) days from the date of this Notice. Comments can be forwarded to the City of Chula Vista; at the above stated address or to the U.S. Department of Transportation, CALTRANS, District 11 Local Assistance, P.O. Box 85406, MS 30, San Diego, California 92186-5406 Attn: District Local Assistance Engineer. Dated at City ofChula Vista, California, this 2nd day of November, 2000, By: ~ -- 276 FOURTH AVENUE / CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910-2631/ (619) 691.5021 A J.I COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving the Park Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and The EastLake Company and Pacific Bay Homes and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Parks and Recreation_ ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager ,~-~Qp./ (4/5ths Vote: Yes__ No X A portion of EastLake III, the Woods Neighborhood, abuts the southem portion of Rolling Hills Ranch. The Woods Neighborhood has an up to seven-acre neighborhood park obligation and Rolling Hills Ranch contains a 22-acre community park site adjacent to Salt Creek. The City would prefer to have the community park enlarged in size, to create an even more useable and functional community park, rather than have the two separate parks fairly close to one another. Both the EastLake Company and Pacific Bay Homes agree. This agreement spells out the terms and conditions to accomplish such a transfer and the creation of the larger community park as well as the guarantees for the necessary parkland improvements. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the Park Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and The EastLake Company and Pacific Bay Homes. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable DISCUSSION: Background The agreement contains obligations for the EastLake Company to insure that their fair share park obligations are still met and the obligation for Pacific Bay Homes to insure that their prior obligations for the community park remain in place. In summary, the plan is that the entire park will be planned and developed as one entity maximizing the recreational potential of the area. EastLake Development Company (ELDC) Obligation In response to a requirement of the City Parkland Dedication Ordinance and the Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the City and EastLake for EastLake III dated XXX, 1999 which, establishes a parkland dedication obligation for seventeen (17) acres for EastLake III, not to exceed seven (7) acres in the EastLake Woods Neighborhood Park. This proposal is for the EastLake Development Company to provide funds to purchase land within the Rolling Hills Ranch Project in lieu of dedicating parkland within the EastLake Woods project. The City Parkland Dedication Ordinance establishes the parkland obligation based upon dwelling units and allows for - / Page 2, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 the provision of payment of in lieu fees for parkland when the City deems it would better serve the public and park and recreation needs of the future residents of a particular subdivision (Chapter 17.10.070). This land is adjacent to the future Rolling Hills Ranch Community Park and directly north of the EastLake Woods project (see Exhibit A). The total net usable acreage of this land purchase is to be deducted fi.om the total parkland acquisition obligation for EastLake m. The balance of the EastLake m parkland dedication obligation is to be satisfied with the dedication of parkland within the EastLake Vista's project. Pacific Bay Homes Obligation In response to the requirements of the City Parkland Dedication Ordinance and The Conditions of Approval for the Tentative Map for the Rolling Hills Ranch project Pacific Bay Homes is providing parkland dedication and improvement monies for a community park. The proposed park site is south of Proctor Valley Road, east of the salt creek corridor open space, west of Duncan Ranch Road and north of three (3) acres of Community Purpose Facility (CPF) site. At the time of approval of Rolling Hills Ranch General Development Plan in 1990, the project was known as Salt Creek Ranch. The Salt Creek Ranch General Development Plan was approved as PCM-90~2. Subsequently, the Salt Creek Ranch SPA plan was approved in 1992 as PCM~91-4. The tentative map for the project was approved by the City Council as PCS-92-02. The Salt Creek Ranch Specific Planning Area (SPA) provides for satisfaction of a portion of the project's CPF requirement with a designated joint use area for parking within the 22-acre community park. The SPA also allows for the conversion of CPF acreage to single-family residential zoning after 1997. Also, in October 1997, Pacific Bay Homes entered into an agreement with the City of Chula Vista, which resulted in the prepayment of all of the park obligations for the Rolling Hills Ranch Project. This "Security Deposit" amounted to $5.6 million. The Rolling Hills Ranch Community Park Modification With the unique relationship of the land parcels involved, Staff has identified an increase in the quality of the proposed Rolling Hills Ranch Community Park. With the originally identified 22 acres the additional seven (+/-) acres of parkland would create a 29-acre Community Park. This proposal also includes relocating the CPF acreage to allow for the Community Park acreage and the land purchased with EastLake In Lieu fees to be contiguous. The CPF site is to be relocated into the southwest comer of the site in a flag lot configuration to facilitate the relationship with the adjacent EastLake Woods land use (School site) and maximize the potential of the Rolling Hill Ranch Community park. Environmental Status An Initial Study conducted by the City of Chula Vista determined that the proposed project would not result in any additional significant environmental effects other than those previously covered under Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report 91-03. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Page 3, Item: /._.'~ Meeting Date: 12/19/00 City Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the project requires an addendum to the Final SEIR-91-03 and Addendum IS-01-29 (Attachment C) was prepared. Land Use Approval Process The planned community district regulations allow a park to be located in any zoning classification with the appropriate City approval. In the case of a private park this approval would er/tai} the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit (after the item had been publicly noticed). The Cityby policy does not issue itself Conditional Use Permits. Since the proposal is for a public community park a Conditional Use Permit is not required. City planning staff (the zoning administrator) utilized a special procedure for the subject land use determination. This procedure, which mirrors the Conditional Use Permit process, provides the public with the oppommity for input, through a written notice to all property owners with 500 feet. The notice provided an explanation of the purposed determination and provided ten days for public comments to be received. As of this date we have received no public comments. The zoning administrator analyzed the proposed park determination on the formerly residentially zoned property based upon the same standards as required for a conditional Use Permit. The zoning administrator was able to make the necessary findings and therefore the determination that the change from a residential to a park designation at the purposed location is allowed. Funding of Agreement The purchase price for the Pacific Bay Homes land exceeds the in lieu fee established by the PDO but the difference has been included in consideration received fi.om the EastLake Company. Additionally Pacific Bay Homes has committed to improving parkland in excess of the Rolling Hills Ranch project's PDO requirements. The improvement monies for the EastLake in lieu acreage are to be drawn by EastLake fi.om money currently deposited with the City for the EastLake Trails Project. The City would be allowing the use of these funds until such time as they are needed for the EastLake Trails Community Park construction at which time they will be replaced by the EastLake Company. In connection therewith EastLake will post a bond or other appropriate security to guarantee reimbursement of the Acquisition Price. In addition, EastLake will pay its park advance fee of$2,135,000 referenced in its development agreement, upon the earlier of commencement of the construction of the Rolling Hills 'Park or City approval of the EastLake III tentative map. Analysis In order to receive a recommendation for approval the proposal should have identifiable improvement to the park and recreational resources for the surrounding conm~unity with minimal or no negative impacts. Staff has considered the following in making a recommendation on the proposed agreement: Page 4, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 1. Effect of proposed agreement on timing of completion of the park. Pacific Bay Homes has recently received a grading permit to grade the site as originally proposed for residential use. If this agreement is approved prior to thc end of thc year Pacific Bay Homes would have adequate time to process a construction change to the grading plans and prior to the actual commencement of grading. This would eliminate any delay or down time for the grading operation and the proposed park site could be graded in a timely and cost effective manner. Staff has been coordinating with the civil engineers for Pacific Bay Homes in creating a preliminary park-grading plan that will maintain as much flexibility as possible until such time as the Rolling Hills Ranch Community Park Master Plan is completed. To date no work has been started on the Park Master Plan. With the approval of this agreement the new park configuration and size would be included in the master planning effort. Therefore this agreement does not delay completion of the park and works with the existing development schedule for the project and thc park. £. Visual impacts to the neighborhood. The proposed park acreage is surrounded by Hunte Parkway and Salt Creek open space on the west, Proctor Valley Road on the north, and Duncan Ranch Road along the cast. The relative elevation with the surrounding land is below grade and allows for easy views onto the parkland. The additional acreage, in being placed contiguous with the proposed park adds to thc visual impact of the parkland. The additional parkland will be lighted however, the potential conflict with residential use has now been diminished with the change of residential use to park use for the proposed area. 3. Potential for negative consequences created by this proposal. The result of loss of parkland within the EastLake Woods neighborhood is minimal given that the product type for the neighborhood are larger single-family residential lots with some outdoor recreation provided within the lots themselves. Additionally, the new parkland with its location along the north project boundary has no significant increase in distance fi.om the Woods' residents. 4. Park maintenance program. The parks maintenance department has long indicated the economies of scale with larger park sites compared to small and irregular shaped lots. This agreement provides an increase to the net usable acreage of the community park with additional improvement to the park's configuration. Staff anticipates that overall park maintenance cost will be reduced in the future as a result of this agreement. 5. Identified benefits to the City for this proposed agreement. As previously stated, the primary accomplishment of this proposal is the increased potential for the Roiling Hills Ranch Community Park. At the same time several other minor issues are addressed constructively. Page 5, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 · The residents of EastLake Woods will have the full parkland acreage available for use in compliance with the City's Park Development Ordinance. · The Rolling Hills Ranch Community Park will remain 22 acres in size. · Funds will continue to be provided for the Community Park improvements. · The increase to 29 contiguous park acres allows increased flexibility and opportunity with the Community Park programming and design. ~ · The agreement allows for a reasonable resolution to the CPF obligations of the Rolling ~Iills Ranch project. · The increase in Community Park size allows for realization of economies of scale and a resultant in future park maintenance costs. Conclusions Staff believes, based upon a full understanding of the issues involved, that the City will realize an increased benefit in the recreational resources available to the residents of Chula Vista. Staff recomme0ds, that the City Council approve the proposed agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff time for review and processing the park plans will be paid by the developer through deposit accounts per existing Processing Agreements. The EastLake Company is providing the full cost of the land purchase amount. To cover that $1.6 million cost EastLake paid to the City $1,391,260 in June 1999 and an additional $319,375 in December 2000. With interest accrued, the total available is $1,812,470 more than enough to cover the land purchase amount. It is anticipated that the City will realize a reduction in future park maintenance costs as a result of this agreement. Attachments: A. Rolling Hills Ranch 22 acre Community Park site with adjacent acreage B. Park Agreement between the City of Chula Vista, EastLake Company, and Pacific Bay Homes C. EIR Addendum H :~HOM E\CHARLiN E\Council ltemshRHR&ELCAgendaStatement.doc ADDITIONAL PARK LAND I ATTACHMENT PARK AGREEMENT This Park Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into to be effective as of December __, 2000 by and between The City of Chula Vista, a municipal corpoi'ation having charter powers ("City"), The EastLake Company, LLC, a California limited liability company ("EastLake") and Pacific Bay Properties, a California corporation ("Pacific Bay"), with reference to the following facts: RECITALS A. EastLake owns certain real property located in the City, which is part of the third phase of the master planned community, commonly known as EastLake ("EastLake III"). EastLake III includes proposed neighborhoods commonly known as EastLake Woods and EastLake Vistas. B. Pursuant to Section 6.1. t.5 of that certain Amended and Restated Development Agreement between City and EastLake for EastLake III dated February 1, 2000, ("Development Agreement") EastLake is required to dedicate seventeen (17) acres of park land for EastLake III, not to exceed seven (7) acres in EastLake Woods, for neighborhood parks. This obligation may be increased if the number of dwelling units increases from that allowed in the current EastLake III General Development Plan. C. Pacific Bay owns certain real property located in the City and adjacent to EastLake III, which is part of the Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area Plan ("Salt Creek Ranch SPA"). D. Pursuant to the Salt Creek Ranch SPA, Pacific Bay is required to dedicate land and construct the Rolling Hills Ranch Community Park ("Rolling Hills Park"). E. Pacific Bay owns certain real property in the Salt Creek Ranch SPA adjacent to the Rolling Hills Park site ("Additional Park Land"), more particularly described and depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto. F. The City desires to acquire the Additional Park Land and use it for expansion of the Rolling Hills Park. Such expansion of Rolling Hills Park would be in lieu of the park in the EastLake Woods neighborhood; provided, however, that EastLake provides the funds to the City for acquisition of the Additional Park Land. G. The City, EastLake and Pacific Bay desire to complete acquisition of the Additional Park Land and expansion of the Rolling Hills Park subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, which the parties hereto acknowledge and agree are true, and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, City, EastLake and Pacific Bay hereby agree as follows: Gray Cary\SD\139412 ATTACHMENT B ARTICLE I OFFER OF DEDICATION 1.1 Purchase/Price. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, EastLake agrees to purchase for the benefit of the City the Additional Park Land for an acquisition price of One Million Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,600,000.00) ("Acquisition Price"). 1.2 Closing Date. The Closing Date shall be within five (5) days of the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in Article V of this Agreement, provided in no event shall the Closing Date be later than December 20, 2000. 1.3 Offer of Dedication. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, Pacific Bay agrees to sell the Additional Park Land for the benefit of the City. The evidence of such sale shall be the delivery of the irrevocable offer to dedicate the Additional Park Land to the City ("Offer of Dedication") in the form set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto. ARTICLE II OPENING OF ESCROW 2.1 Opening of Escrow. Within three (3) days of the parties' of the execution of this Agreement, the parties shall open an escrow with First American Title Company ("Escrow Agent") by delivering copies of this Agreement signed by the parties, and funds and instruments, required by this Agreement. The first date on which all of the preceding events have been completed will be the "Escrow Opening Date." 2.2 Fees. EastLake and Pacific Bay shall share equally all Escrow costs and fees, including termination fees, if any. 2.3 Automatic Termination. If the Escrow is automatically terminated pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the following will apply: 2.3.1 Escrow Agent will return all funds and documents held by it to the party depositing 'the same, except the Escrow Agent may return such funds and documents usually obtained by Escrow Agent's in accordance with standard escrow termination procedures. 2.3.2 Escrow Agent may deduct any funds held by Escrow Agent in a sufficient amount to pay its termination fees in full. 2.3.3 Escrow Agent will be entitled to take no further actioh until directed to do so, either by the parties mutual written instructions or by a final order or judgment of report of competent jurisdiction. 2.3.4 Each party will promptly sign and deliver to Escrow Agent any Escrow termination instructions requested by Escrow Agent together with EastLak¢'s and Pacific Bay's share of Escrow Agent's termination fees. 2.3.5 Notwithstanding the automatic termination of the Escrow, the covenants of the parties set forth in this Agreement are not thereby rescinded or terminated, and each party will be left with all its legal or equitable remedies. Gray Cary~,S D\[ 394121.4 2,0,908_, ARTICLE III EASTLAKE'S DELIVERIES TO ESCROW AGENT 3.1 Deliveries Before Closing Date. EastLake will, no later than noon of the last business day before the Closing Date, deliver to Escrow Agent each of the following: 3.1.1 The Acquisition Price in cash of $1,600,000.00. ARTICLE IV PACIFIC BAY'S DELIVERIES TO ESCROW AGENT 4.1 Deliveries Before Closing Date. Pacific Bay will, no later than noon of the last business day before the Closing Date, deliver to Escrow Agent each of the following: 4.1.1 The Offer of Dedication for the Additional Park Land executed and acknowledged by Pacific Bay. ARTICLE V CONDITIONS PRECEDENT 5.1 City Conditions Precedent. The closing of Escrow shall be subject to the satisfaction or waiver by the City of each of the following conditions precedent' 5.1.1 Approval of Title. Delivery to Escrow Agent prior to December 12, 2000, of City's written approval of the title described in a preliminary title report and a title policy pro forma of the Additional Park Land issued by First American Title Company ("Preliminary Title Report"). Escrow Agent is instructed to obtain the Preliminary Title Report (and a copy of each of the documents reported therein) at EastLake and Pacific Bay's equally shared expense and to deliver the same to City within five (5) days following the Escrow Opening Date. If after City's review of the Preliminary Title Report, the City determines the title of the Additional Park Land is not acceptable to the City, City agrees to give Pacific Bay a written title objection and Pacific Bay may cur~ such condition(s) prior to the Closing Date. If Pacific Bay decides in its sole discretion not to cure the title condition of the Additional Park Land, Pacific Bay agrees to give City written notice of its decision to not cure within three (3) days of Pacific Bay's receipt of the City's written title objection and this Agreement shall be terminated. Pacific Bay's failure to give City written notice within such three (3) day period shall be deemed its decision to not cure the title objection(s) and this Agreement shall automatically terminate. 5.1.2 Grading Plan. Delivery to Escrow Agent, prior to ihe Closing Date, of City's written approval of the conceptual site grading plan for the Rolling Hills Park and the Additional Park Land, subject to final engineering. 5.1.3 EastLake Funds. EastLake has posted the bond or other security acceptable to City pursuant to Section 8.1 of this Agreement. 5.1.4 Dedication. Pacific Bay has delivered the Offer of Dedication to the Escrow Agent in a form approved by City. Gray Cary\SDX1394121 4 2~01908-1 5.1.5 Taxes. Pacific Bay has paid all real property taxes or other fees, if any, on the Additional Park Land pro-rata to the Closing Date. 5.2 EastLake Condition Precedent. The closing of Escrow shall be subject to the satisfaction or waiver by EastLake of the following condition precedent: 5.2.1 Receipt of Funds. EastLake's receipt .of previously paid park fees in the amount of $1,600,000.00 from City as provided in Section 8.1. ARTICLE VI PACIFIC BAY COVENANTS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 6.1 Park Construction. Pacific Bay shall complete construction of the Rolling Hills Park, including the Additional Park Land, in accordance with all City requirements. 6.2 Grading. Pacific Bay shall grade the entire Rolling Hills Community Park site, including the Additional Park Land, commencing no later than January 1, 2001. Completion shall be no later than four (4) months after the start date. Such grading shall be in accordance with the grading plan approved by City. 6.3 Fair Market Value. Pacific Bay acknowledges and agrees that the Acquisition Price of $1,600,000.00 is the fair market value of the Additional Park Land, based on a residential use of the Additional Park Land, as of the date of this Agreement. 6.4 Taxes. Pacific Bay shall pay all real property taxes or other fees, if any, on the Additional Park Land, pro-rata to the Closing Date. 6.5 Obligations. Pacific Bay shall fully cooperate with the City to process releases from the follo~ving agreements affecting the Additional Park Land which shall release the Additional Park Land from the obligations set forth in the agreements: Affordable Housing Agreement San Diego County Recorder No. 97-0359972; Supplement Subdivision Improvement Agreement San Diego County Recorder No. 97-0400742; Mitigation Agreement San Diego County Recorder No. 97-0561204; and Easement and Maintenance Agreement San Diego County Recorder No. 98-0445083. Pacific Bay acknowledges and agrees that it is the City's intent that the Additional Park Land shall have no responsibility for the provisions set forth in those agreements. 6.6 Park Obligation. Pacific Bay acknowledges and agrees 'that it is providing between 21.5 and 22 acres of park at its Roiling Hills Park site to be based on final maps. In consideration of the terms of this Agreement, Pacific Bay agrees to provide the full cost of the improvements portion of the PAD fee for the 22 acres of park site which is in excess of the Rolling Hills Ranch PAD ordinance obligation. Pacific Bay and City entered into a Letter Agreement for Prepayment of Park Fees dated October 1, 1997, which set forth the security deposit for the development portion of the park acquisition and development fees ("PAD Fees") for all 2,616 units approved in accordance with Salt Creek Ranch Tentative Map No. 92-02 adopted per Resolution No. 16834. In the event that development of Neigh~aorhoods 9-I 3 results in fewer than the 438 units approved for these neighborhoods as a result of third party 2101908-1Gray Cary\SD\1394121 4 governmental action by an agency such as United States Fish and Wildlife Service which are beyond Pacific Bay's control, Pacific Bay shall be entitled to a refund of the difference between the actual number of units mapped in Neighborhoods 9-13 and 438 multiplied by $2,260, the development portion of the PAD fee in effect at the time the security deposit was made. Should the Security Deposit have been previously expended for the construction of the park, the refund shall come from such other fund as the City may deem appropriate. City and Pacific Bay acknowledge that, due to a reduction in the number of units previously mapped in Neighborhoods 1-8, this arrangement results in a land dedication and development fee provision in excess of its obligations pursuant to the PAD ordinance obligation for the project. ARTICLE VII REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 7.1 Hazardous Materials. To the best of Pacific Bay's actual knowledge and without inquiry or investigation and specifically without imputing constructive knowledge, no Hazardous Materials have been discovered, released, discarded, discharged, disposed, or stored in, from or on the Additional Park Land. "Hazardous Materials" means any substance, material or waste which is or becomes (i) regulated by any local or regional governmental authority, the State of California or the United States Government as hazardous waste, (ii) is defined as a "solid waste", "sludge", "hazardous waste", "extremely hazardous waste", "restricted hazardous waste", "Non-RCRA hazardous waste", "RCRA hazardous waste", or "recyclable material", under any federal, state or local statute, regulation or ordinance, including ~vithout limitation Sections 25115, 25117, 25117.9, 25120.2, 25120.5, 251227, 25140, 25141 of the California Health and Safety Code; (iii) defined as "Hazardous Substance" under Section 25316 of the California Health and Safety Code; (iv)defined as a "Hazardous Material", "Hazardous Substance", or "Hazardous Waste" under Section 25501 of the California Health and Safety Code; (v) defined as a "Hazardous Substance" under Section 25281 of the California Health and Safety Code; (vi)asbestos; (vii)petroleum products, including without limitation, petroleum, gasoline, used oil, crude oil, waste oil and any fraction hereof, natural gas, natural gas liquefied, natural gas or synthetic fuels, (viii)materials defined as hazardous or extremely hazardous pursuant to the California Code of Regulations; (ix) polychlorinated biphenyls; (x) defined as a "Hazardous Substance" pursuant to Section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et seq.); (xi) defined as a "Hazardous Waste" pursuant to Section 1004 of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et seq., (xii) defined as a "Hazardous Substance" or "Mixed Waste" pursuant to Section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601 et seq. and regulations promulgated thereunder; (xiii)defined as a "Hazardous Substance" pursuant to Section 401.15 of the Clean Water Act, 40 C.F.R. 116; or (xiv)defined as an "Extremely Hazardous Substance" pursuant to Section 302 of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorizations Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. Section 11002 et seq. 7.2 Bio-Grow. Pacific Bay hereby discloses that it is informed that Biosolid materials used as fertilizer were applied by RPI-Biogrow, predecessor to Synagro '(presently located at P.O. Box 7027, Corona, California 92878) in and around the Additional Park Land from on or about November 18, 1999 to November 30, 1999. Pacific Bay makes no representations and/or warranties with respect to such Bio-Grow or the compliance or lack of compliance with applicable law. City acknowledges that the Additional Park Land may not be occupied, Gray Cary\SD\1394121.4 // inhabited or used for human habitation for one year from November 30, 1999, the last date Pacific Bay is aware of the use of Bio-Grow fertilizer. ARTICLE VIII COVENANTS 8.1 Acquisition Reimbursement. Prior to Closing, the City shall provide park fees previously paid by EastLake in the amount of $1,600,000.00 for EastLake's payment of the Acquisition Price for the Additional Park Land. After the Closing Date, when required herein, EastLake shall pay the City $1,600,000.00 cash as r~imbursement for providing EastLake the Acquisition Price. In connection therewith, EastLake shall, prior to the Close of Escrow, post a bond or other security acceptable to City, to guarantee reimbursement of the $1,600,000.00 Acquisition Price. EastLake agrees to pay the $1,600,000.00 reimbursement to the City within ten (10) days of the commencement of construction of the Salt Creek Community Park as notified by the City. Upon EastLake's payment to City of the $1,600,000.00 reimbursement, the City shall release the bond or other security posted to guarantee such reimbursement. EastLake further covenants that it shall pay the park advance fee of $2,135,000.00 described in Section 6.1.2.1 of the Development Agreement, upon the earlier to occur of (i) commencement of construction of the Rolling Hills Park, or (ii) City approval of the EastLake Ili tentative map. EastLake shall be responsible for any additional costs in the acquisition of the Additional Park Land, such as escrow fees. 8.2 ~parate Account. EastLake shall be responsible for the entire cost of the Additional Park Land development of 5.6 net usable acres (plus or minus one-tenth of an acre), in accordance with the City's PAD Fee ordinance, as amended from time to time. Such fees shall be deposited in the Pacific Bay existing park deposit account, subject to the same requirements and provisions. 8.3 Park Acreage. City shall grant EastLake 5.6 acres (plus or minus one-tenth of an acre depending on final engineering) park acreage credit equal to the amount of net usable park acreage available on the Additional Park Land. In the event that the amount of net usable park acreage on the Additional Park Land, plus the net usable park acreage in EastLake Vistas, does not satisfy the EastLake III park acreage obligations, EastLake shall pay an amount equal to the difference between (i)the net usable park acreage on the Additional Park Land plus the net usable park acreage in EastLake Vistas, and (ii) the park acreage obligations of the EastLake III project based on the residential units within EastLake III and the City's PAD Fee ordinance. As part of the 5.6 park acreage credit, EastLake shall convey to City, within 30-days of the date of this Agreement, certain real property, owned by EastLake, 14 feet wide adjacent to the southern boundary of the Additional Park Land for use as a public park trail to serve the Rolling Hills Park, provided that such conveyance shall be required only if the Offer of Dedication is delivered to City as provided in this Agreement. 8.4 Utility Easements. City shall permit water, sewer, storm drain and other drainage easements across the Additional Park Land necessary for development of adjacent properties in the Salt Creek Ranch SPA, provided the locations of such easements are in the least obtrusive locations possible and do not interfere with use of the Additional Park Land for a public park. The locations of such utility easements have been approved by the City, as shown on Exhibit C attached hereto. Gray Cary\SD\t 394121.4 ,,0t908-, 1.7__- 8.5 Site Configuration. The parties acknowledge that this Agreement will result in a reconfiguration and redesignation of the land uses as described in the Salt Creek Ranch SPA as follows: redesignate the 3 acre CPF site, south of and contiguous to the Rolling Hills Park to park land, and redesignate a 3 acre site at the southwest comer of Neighborhood 8 from Residential Low to CPF, all as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto. Pacific Bay agrees to fully cooperate with the City to effectuate the reconfiguration and redesignation through the exchange of necessary documentation. ARTICLE 1X CLOSING ' 9.1 Conditions to Closing. Escrow Agent will close the Escrow on the Closing Date by (i) filing for record the Offer of Dedication and (ii) delivering funds and documents to the parties' as set forth below, when each of the following conditions has been satisfied: 9.1.1 All funds and documents described in Article III and Article IV have been delivered to Escrow Agent. 9.1.2 All conditions set forth in Article V have been satisfied or waived by City or EastLake, as applicable. 9.2 Distribution. Escrow Agent will, at the close of Escrow, pay to Pacific Bay the Acquisition Price and cause the County Recorder to mail to the City the Offer of Dedication. ARTICLE X MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 10.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire understanding and agreement of the parties with respect to the herein subject matter, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or expressly referred to as an Exhibit herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement. 10.2 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected, unless the parties otherwise agree in writing. 10.3 Interpretation and Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the parties hereto, and the role of construction to the effect the ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement, all parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof. Gray Cary\SD\1394}21 4 t0.4 Section Headings. All section heading and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement. 10.5 Singular and Plural. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural. 10.6 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement as to which time is an element. 10.7 Waiver. Failure of a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other party ~vith the terms of this Agreement thereafter. 10.8 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit for the parties and their successors and assigns. No other person shall have any right of action based upon any provisions of this Agreement. 10.9 Force Majeure. Neither party shall be deemed to be in default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by earthquakes, other Acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, strikes and other labor difficulties beyond the party's control (including the party's employment force), government regulations, court actions (such as restraining orders or injunctions), or other causes beyond the party's control. 10.10 Covenants. The covenants contained herein are mutual covenants and also constitute conditions to the concurrent or subsequent performance by the party benefitted thereby of the covenants to be performed hereunder by such benefitted party. The covenants set forth in this Agreement shall survive the Closing and recording of the Offer of Dedication. 10.11 Successors In Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors, assigns and interests of the parties until released by the mutual consent of the parties. 10.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the parties in counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all the parties had executed the same instrument. 10.13 Jurisdiction and Venue. Any action or law or in equity arising under this Agreement or brought by an party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed and tried in the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, and the parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing, removal or change of venue to any other court. 10.14 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement. Upon the request of either party at any time, the other party shall promptly execute, with ackno~vledgment of affidavit if reasonably required, and file or ~ecord such required Gray Cary\S D\1394121 4 instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary under the terms of this Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the provisions of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 10.15 Amendments in Writing/Cooperation. This Agreement may be amended only by written consent of all parties specifically approving the amendment. The parties shall cooperate in good faith with respect to any amendment proposed in order to clarify the intent and application of this Agreement, and shall treat any such proposal on its own merits, and not as a basis for the introduction or unrelated matters. [REMAINDER OF THE PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Gray Cary\SD\1394121.4 / 21019081 /3~- [2 10.16 Notices. Any notice called for in this Agreement shall be sent by hand delivery, overnight courier service, or by registered or certified mail as follows: To City at: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 Attn: George Krempl To EastLake at: The EastLake Company, LLC 900 Lane Avenue, Suite 100 Chula Vista, California 91914 Attn: William Ostrem To Pacific Bay at: Pacific Bay Properties 2300 Boswell Road, Suite 209 Chula Vista, CA 91914 Attn: Liz Jackson or such other address as a party may inform the others of from time to time. Any such notices sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, shall be deemed to have been duly given and received seventy-two (72) hours after the same is so addressed and mailed with postage prepaid. Notices delivered by overnight service shall be deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after delivery the same, charges prepaid to the U.S. Postal Service or private courier. Any notice or other document sent by any other matter shall be effective only upon actual receipt thereof. 10.17 Authority to Execute. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of EastLake and Pacific Bay warrants and represents that he/they have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his/their corporation, partnership or business entity and warrants and represents that he/they has/have the authority to bind EastLake and Pacific Bay to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 10.18 Exhibits and Attachments. All Exhibits referred to within the Agreement are incorporated by reference to this Agreement. All Attactxments referenced herein are purely for informational purposes and are not incorporated nor made a part of the Agreement. Gray Ca~y\S D\1394121.4 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first set forth above. CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE EASTLAKE COMPANY, LLC, a California limited liability company Shirley Horton, Mayor ~/~//~~ By: W~ ATTEST: Susan Bigelow President City Clerk By: /~ Approved as to form by Gu y'Xsar6 Vice President John M. Kaheny City Attorney PACIFIC BAY PROPERTIES, a California corporation By: Its: By: Its: Gray Cary\S D\I 394121.4 / ~ 2101908-1 /'~ ~ / DEC 15 '00 10:08 FR PACIFIC BAY HOMES ?14 ?24 8934 TO 16194095825 P.15/22 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties herdo have eXecuted this Ag:reem~t on the day and year first set forth above. CITY OF CHUI~x VISTA . T~I~ EASTLAKE COM]PANY, LLC, . a California limited liability comp;my . Sltirley Ho~ton, Mayor ATTEST: ! William T. Ostrcm Su~ Big~low i President Cit7 Clerk Approved as to form by By,: Guy Asazo Vice President John M, City Attorney PACIFIC BAY PROPEKTIES, a California c~rporation ! Its: EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE I WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MONUMENT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 26, AS FOUND PER RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 14064 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER FEBRUARY 5, 1993 AND DESCRIBED AS "A 2' IRON PIPE WITH DISK MARKED "L.S. 4324" "; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 26, SOUTH 88°27'32" EAST, 3503.83 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 20°37'36" WEST, 537_ 13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 08°52'51" WEST, 80.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73°13'29" EAST, 542.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02°32'00'' WEST, 7.18 FEETTO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE. CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 480.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°17'00'' A DISTANCE OF 287.21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31°45'00" EAST, 318.37 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°53'23" A DISTANCE OF 72.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21 °51'37" EAST, 120.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 480.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°39'33" A DISTANCE OF 30.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 26: THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 88°27'32" WEST, 121.63 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 31045'00'' WEST, 453.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58°15'00'' WEST, 391.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20°37'36" EAST, 177.08 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID PAGE I OF 2 ;Dt3~ M:\1413~47~.egal Descriptions~A03 ADDITIONAL PARK LAND.doc SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 26; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH · 88°27'32" WEST, 15.12 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. · PARCEL CONTAINS 6.056 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. DANA MICHAEL SEGOIN L.S. 6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC, PAGE 2 OF 2 :DI~S M:\1413~:)4~l.egal Description$~A03 ADDITIONAL PARK LAND. doc DEC 15 'DO [~D: 16 F R PF~CIF [C BIqY HOMES,S.D619 656 4306 TI] 4095E]2:3 P.D6/ED EXHIBIT "A" ADDITIONAL PARK LAND ORIGINAL P~K LAND ~'~ 2'i. ~,98 ~¢REX OPeN SPAC£ tl 6.056 ACRES EXHIBIT B OFFER OF DEDICATION Recording Requested by and Please Return to: City Clerk City of Chula Vista P.O. Box 1087 Chula Vista, California 91912 This Instrument Benefits City Only. No Fee Required. · This Space for Recorder's Use Only APN(s) C.V. File No. IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF FEE INTEREST FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, PACIFIC BAY PROPERTIES , a , represents that, as the owner of the herein-described real property (referred to as "Grantor"), Grantor hereby makes an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of fee interest to THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, the hereinafter described real property. The real property referred to above is situated in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California and is more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. This Offer of Dedication is made pursuant to Section 7050 of the Govermment Code of the State of California and may be accepted at any time by the City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista. This Offer of Dedication of fee interest shall be irrevocable and shall be binding on the Grantor, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Gray Cary\SD\1394121 4 /~-~-~ ~c ~ 2101908-1 B-1 SIGNATURE PAGE Signed this day of ,2000. PACIFIC BAY PROPERTIES , a By: Its: By: Its: This is to certify that the interest in real property offered herein to the City of Chula Vista, a governmental agency, is hereby acknowledged by the undersigned, City Clerk, on behalf of the Chula Vista City Council pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution No. 15645 of the Chula Vista City Council adopted on June 5, 1990, and the Grantee's consent to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. SUSAN BIGELOW CITY CLERK By: Date: 2101908-I B-2 STATE OF CALiFORNIA }ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO On ,2000, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared IZI personally known to me, or UI proved to me or~ the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (S E A L) Signature of Notary Public STATE OF CALIFORNIA } ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO On ,2000, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared UJ personally known to me, or ~ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (S E A L) Signature of Notary Public Gray Cary\SD\1394121 4 2101908-1 B-3 u~u id '~w 09:21FR PRCIFIC BAY HOM~S,S.D619 6~ 4305 TO ~959~5 P.04/10 EXHIBIT "A" To TOD LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE sOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE I WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTy OF: SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MONUMENT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 26, AS FOUND PER RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 14064 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER FEBRUARY 5, 1993 AND DESCRIBED AS "A 2" IRON PIPE WITH DISK MARKED 'ES_ 4324" '; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 26, SOUTH 88~27'32'' EAST, 3503.83 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 20~37'36'' WEST, 537.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 08"5251" WEST, 80,00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73°13'29" EAST, 542.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02~32'00" WEST, 7.18 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 480.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°17'00° A DISTANCE OF 287.21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31°45'00" EAST, 318.37 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A C, URVE, GONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°53'23` A DISTANCE OF 72,50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21°51'37" EAST, 120.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 480_00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'3g'33" A DISTANCE OF 30.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 26; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 88°Z7'32'' WEST, 1;21.63 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 31°45'00" WEST, 453,55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58°15'00" WEST, 391.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20~37'35'' EAST, 177.08 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID PAGE 1 OF 2 ;D~S M:~.1413~0~7~.,egal Descrip[i~ns~,~3 ADDITIONAL PAJ~.~ DEC 1~ '00 09:21 FR P;~CIFIC B~Y HOMES,S-D[lg 65~ ~;BOfi TO 4895925 P.05/10 SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 26; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 88"27'32" WEST. 15.12 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 6.056 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, DANA MICHAEL SEGO]N LS. 6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. PAGE 2 OF 2 ~ANDSCMPE BUFFER AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT TO THE CI~ O~ C, ~ PRO?OSEO 5.5' WIDE TREE PLANTING AND EASEMENT PARK SITE TO THE CITY OF C.V. 10' WIDE ~EN£RAL UTILfTY AND PROPOSEO 20' WIDE AccESS EAS£MENI' TO SEWER, DRAINAGE AND THE cITY OF C.V. ACCESS E~SEMENT FOR TO THE CffY OF pROPOSED $2' WIDE PRIVATE ACCESS DISEMENT FOR THE BENEFff OF THE CPF SITE. 20' WIDE GENERAL UTILITY AND ACCESS E~SEMENT TO THE CITY OF C.V. CPF 5/~E ADDENDUM TO EIR-91-03 (Salt Creek Ranch SPA Final Supplemental EIR-91-03) PROJECT NAME: Rolling Hills Ranch Park Agreement (AKA Salt Creek Ranch) PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast Quadrant of Hunte Parkway and Proctor Valley Road in the Salt Creek Ranch Residential Master Planned Community ~ PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista CASE NO.: IS-01-29 DATE: December 5, 2000 I. INTRODUCTION The enviromnental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista allow the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) to prepare an addendum to a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report (EIR) if one of the following conditions is present: 1. The minor changes in the project design which have occurred since completion of the Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (Final SEIR-91-03) have not created any new significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final SEIR. 2. Additional or refined information available since completion of the Environmental Impact Report regarding the potential environmental impact of the project, or regarding the measures or alternatives available to mitigate potential environmental effects of the project, does not show that the project will have one or more significant impacts which were not previously addressed in the Negative Declaration. This addendum has been prepared in order to specifically provide additional information and analysis concerning land use impacts as a result of the proposed Park Agreement between the City of Chula Vista; the EastLake Company, LLC and Pacific Bay Properties for the acquisition of 7-acres of residential property (As shown in Figure A) within the Salt Creek Ranch Master Plarmed Community for development as an expansion of the Rolling Hills Ranch Community Park (Rolling Hills Park). Final SEIR-91-03 analyzed the impacts of the affected ATTACHMENT C 2-8 property based on low density (0-3 du/ac) residential land uses. As a result of this analysis, the basic conclusions of the Final SEIR have not changed. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared the following addendum to Final SE1R-91-03. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a Park Agreement between the City of Chula Vista, the EastLake Company and Pacific Bay Properties. The City proposes to acquire a 7 acre site, designated for single family residential, in Salt Creek Ranch Neighborhood 8 for development as an expansion of Rolling Hills Park. Development of the site as a public park would fulfill the EastLake Company's obligation for development of a park in the EastLake Woods neighborhood. The funds to acquire the 7 acre site would be collected from the EastLake Company and the additional park land would be developed by Pacific Bay Properties. The proposed Park Agreement includes an amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan to redesignate the three (3) acre CPF site, south of and contiguous to the Rolling Hills Park, for park land and redesiguate a three (3) acre site at the southwest comer of Neighborhood 8 from Residential Low to CPF (Figure B). The Park Agreement also includes the transfer of ten (10) single family residential units from Neighborhood 8 to the CPF site in Neighborhood 9. The CPF site would be redesiganted l~om CPF to Residential Low. The subject 7 acre site is designated Residential Low and zoned SF 1 (Single Family Detached) in the approved SPA Plan. The approved Tentative Map for Salt Creek Ranch, Neighborhood 8 shows 21 single family residential lots on the subject 7 acre site. III. PROJECT SETTING The subject 7-acre site is located at the southwest comer of Neighborhood 8 in the Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan. The site is currently vacant and is included in an approved tentative tract map for development with 21 single family residential homes. The site is bounded by Community Park designated land to the north, open space and Hunte Parkway to the west, Single Family Residential to the east, and the EastLake III Master Planned Commtmity to the south. IV. COMPATIBILITY WITH ZONING AND PLANS The subject 7 acre site is designated Residential Low and zoned SF I in the Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan. The SPA District Regulations allow parks within the SF 1 land use district subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The requirement for a conditional use permit is waived since the proposed project . is City initiated. V. IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS An Initial Study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including the attached Environmental Checklist form) determined that thc proposed project would not result in any additional significant environmental effects than those previously covered under Final SEIR-91-03. Land Use Analysis The proposal consists of the acquisition by the City of Chula Vista of a 7-acre site located at the southwest comer of Neighborhood 8 in the approved Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan. The acquired land will be used for the expansion of Rolling Hills Park located north of the subject site. The expansion of Rolling Hills Park would be in lieu of the required park in thc EastLake Woods neighborhood, provided that the EastLake Company provides the funds to thc City for acquisition of the additional park land. The vacant 7 acre site is designated Residential Low (0-3 du/ac) and Conununity Purpose Facility (CPF) in the approved SPA Plan and was analyzed as such in Salt Creek Ranch Final SEIR-91- 03. As par~ of the Park Agreement Pacific Bay Properties is required to submit and process an application for an amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan to redesignate the additional Park Land for park use and reconfignrc the Rolling Hills Park site and the adjacent properties as set forth in Figure B. Thc SPA Plan amendment will also include the transfer of ten (10) residential units from Neighborhood 8 (from the additional park land) to Neighborhood 9. Thc CPF site in Neighborhood 9 will be redesignated to Residential Low to accommodate the ten (10) additional units. Adjustments will be made to the approved SPA Plan to reflect these changes. The proposed amendments do not involve additional land not previously analyzed in Final SEIR-91-03. The proposed amendments do not introduce land uses not previously analyzed by SEIR-91-03. Development of the subject site as a park in lieu of single family residential homes will result in a net decrease of eleven (11) single family residential units in the Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan and the reduction of four (4) acres of CPF designated land in Neighborhood 9. The proposed Park Agreement does not result in any significant change or intensity of land use than previously analyzed in Final SEIR-91-03. Final SEIR- 91-03 analyzed the subject 7-acre site as Residential Low with a trip generation of 100 trips per acre (10 trips/du). The trip generation rate for park land was analyzed at 50,trips per acre. Redesignation of the project site for park land and the transfer of ten (10) residential units to the CPF site in Neighborhood 9 results in less vehicle trips per acre. The required SPA amendments would not affect the previously approved circulation system. Local streets aimed at serving the interior neighborhoods would not change. The proposed changes are found to be in substantial conformance with the adopted SPA Plan. CONCLUSION Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and based upon the above discussion, I hereby find that the project revisions to the proposed project will result in only minor technical changes or additions which are necessary to make Final SE1R-91-03 adequate under CEQA. Marilyn~R.F. Ponseggi, ~ 0 Date Environmental Review Coordinator REFERENCES Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan FSEIR 91-03, February 1992 Salt Creek Ranch General Development Plan/Pre-Zone FE1R 89-3, August 1990 Salt Creek Ranch General Development Plan & SPA Plan, August 1990 , Park Agreement, 11/20/00 (Revised) Case No. IS-01-29 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Name of Proponent: City of Chula Vista 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 3. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Same as Above 4. Name of Proposal: Rolling Hills Ranch Park Agreement 5. Date of Checklist: December 5, 2000 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated lmpact Impact L LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or [] [3 [] [] zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental [] [] [] [~ plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Affect agricultural resources or operations [] [] [] ~ (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement [] [] [] [g of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? Comments: The subject park site is currently vacant and located at the southwest comer of Neighborhood 8 in the approved Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan (AKA Rolling Hills Ranch). The proposed project is a Park Agreement between the City of Chula Vista, the EastLake Company and Pacific Bay Properties. The City proposes to acquire a 7-acre site, approved for development with 21 single-family residential units for development as an expansion of Rolling Hills Ranch Community Park (Rolling Hills Park). The proposed Park Agreement includes an amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan to redesignate a three (3) acre CPF site, sottth of and contiguous to the Rolling Hills Park, for park land and redesignate a three (3) acre site at the southwest comer of Neighborhood 8 from Residential Low to CPF (Figure B). The Park Page Agreement also includes the transfer often (10) single family residential units firom Neighborhood 8 to the CPF site in Neighborhood 9. The CPF site would be redesiganted fi.om CPF to Residential Low. The proposed Park Agreement requires the EastLake Company to file and process an amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan. The proposed Park Agreement will require an amendment to the Salt Creek Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan. The amendment will result in changes in a land use in Neighborhoods 8 and 9. In Neighborhood 8, the subject 7 acre site is designated Residential Low and zoned SF 1 in the SPA Plan. The SPA District Regulations allow parks within the SF 1 land use district subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The requirement for a conditional use permit is waived since the proposed project is City initiated. The proposed park would allow for the expansion of an approved community park in Neighborhood 8. The proposed park use is compatible with the proposed CPF site to the south and Residential Low land uses to the east. In Neighborhood 9, the proposed change in land use fi.om CPF to Residential Low does not result in an incompatible land use. The subject four (4) acre CPF site is bounded by single family residential land uses to the north, east, and west, and Proctor Valley Road to the south. Potentially II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the PotentiallySignificantLess than SignificantUnless Significant No proposal: Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or [] [] [] ~1 local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either [] [] [] ~ directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infi.astructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially [] [] [] ~g affordable housing? Comments: The proposed Park Agreement would result in the conversion of residential land, approved for 21 single family units, to park land with 10 of the approved single family residential units being transferred to Neighborhood 9 of Salt Creek Ranch. The proposal will result in a net decrease of 11 dwelling units in the approved SPA Plan. The subject 21 single family units were not part of an affordable housing program. Issues related to housing and growth were adequately addressed in Final SEIR-91-03. Based on the above noted comments, the proposal will not result in a significant impact to population and housing. Potentially III. GEOPHYSICAL. ~Vould the proposal result Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No in or expose people to potential impacts Impact Mitigated Impact Impact involving: a)Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or [] [3 [2 ~ overcovering of the soil? Page - 2 c) Change in topography or ground surface [] [] [] [~ relief features? d) The destruction, covering or modification of [] [] [] $ any unique geologic or physical features? e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of [] [] [] [] soils, either on or off the site? f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach [] [] [3 ~ sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay inlet or lake? g) Exposure of people or property to geologic [] [] [] ~ hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Comments: The proposed Park Agreement does not result in any additional geophysical changes in that geology and soils issues were adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface [] [3 [] ~ runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water [] [] [] ~ related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? c) Discharge into surface waters or other D [3 [] ~ alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in [] [] [3 0[ any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course of [] [] E ~ direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, [] [] [] ~ either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of [] [3 [] 0t groundwater? Page - 3 h) Impacts to grotmdwater quality? [] [] [] i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood [] [] [] waters? j) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: The proposed Park Agreement does not result in any additional impacts to water. Water quality and hydrology were adequately addressed in FEIR 89-3 and FSEIR 91~3. Potentially V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Violate any air quality standard or [] [] [] contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? [] [] [] c) Alter air movement, moisture, or [] [] [] temperature, or cause any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d) Create objectionable odors? [] [] [] e) Create a substantial increase in stationary or [] [] [] non-stationary soumes of air emissions or the deterioration of ambient air quality? Comments: The proposal does not result in additional impacts to air quality. Impacts to air quality impacts were adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3. Potentially VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Would the proposal result in: Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? [] [] [] b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., [] [] [] iX sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e'.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to [] [] [] nearby uses? d)Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off- site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or [] [] [] bicyclists? Page - 4 f') Conflicts with adopted policies support'mg [] [] [2 ~, alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? [] [] [] ~ h) A "large project" under the Congestion [] [] [] [g Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips.) Comments: Traffic Impacts were adequately addressed in Final EIR289-3 and Final SEIR-91-03. AdditiOnally, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, IS-00-05 was subsequently prepared in March 2000 to address additional traffic impacts associated with an accelerated development phasing schedule. Mitigation measures were included to reduce additional potential impacts to below a level of significance. The proposed Park Agreement does not result in an increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion than previously analyzed in the previous environmental documents. The proposal does not change the conclusions of the previous traffic impact analysis discussed in the previous environmental documents. The Park Agreement includes a density transfer of 11 single family dwelling units from Neighborhood 8 to Neighborhood 9 which results in an overall reduction in density of 10 single family dwelling units. The subject 7 acre site was analyzed as Residential Low with a trip generation of 100 trips per acre (10 trips/du) in Final SE1R-91-03. The trip generation rate for park land was analyzed at 50 trips per acre. Redesignation of the project site for park land and the transfer often (10) residential units to the CPF site in Neighborhood 9 results in fewer vehicles trips per acre. Local streets aimed at serving the interior neighborhoods would not change. Potentially VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the PotentiallySignificantLess than SignificantUnless Significant No proposal result in impacts to: Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of ~ [] © ~g concern or species that are candidates for listing? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage [] [] [] [~ trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities [] [] [] ~tl (e.g., oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and [] [3 [3 [1 vemal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? [] [] [] [g f) Affect regional habitat preservation [] [] ~ 01 planning efforts? Page - 5 Comments: Impacts to biological resources were adequately addressed in Final EIR-89-3 and Final SEIR-91- 03. Additionally, biological resources were addressed further in a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration, IS-00-05, prepared in March 2000. Mitigation measures were included in IS-00-0fi to reduce potential biological impacts to below a level of significance. The proposed Park Agreement and resulting changes in land use do not result in any new biological impacts. The subject property was anticipated for development in thc previous environmental documents. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Significant Unless Significant No Would the proposal: Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation [] [] [] ~ plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful [] [] [] ~ and inefficient manner? c) If the site is designated for mineral resource [] [] [] 0~ protection, will this project impact this protection? Comment: The proposal does not result in additional impacts to energy and mineral resources. Impacts to gas, electricity, and energy were adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3. Potentially IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: PotentiallySignificantLess than SignificantUnless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of [] [] [] '~ hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: petroleum products, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency [] [] [] ~ response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or [] [] [] ~ potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ~3 [] [] [~ potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with [] [] [] [~ flammable brush, grass, or trees? Comments: The proposed project does not involve the use of hazardous substances or will not result in the exposure of the public to potential health or safety hazards. Page - 6 Potentially X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: Potentially Significant Le~$ than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Increases in existing noise levels? [] [] [] ~ b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? [] [] ~3 ~ Comments: The proPosed project would not result in any additional noise impacts. Noise impacts were adequately addressed FEIR-89-3 and FSEIR-9 !-3. Potentially XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal PotentiallySignificantLess than ~ No have an effect upon, or result in a need for new SignificantUnless Significant Impact Mitigated Impact Impact or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? [] E [] ~[ b) Police protection? [] [] [] ~1 c) Schools? [] ~ [] [~ d) Maintenance of public facilities, including [] [] [] ~l roads? e) Other governmental services? [] [] [] ~1 Comments: The proposal would not result in any additional impacts to public services other than those previously identified and addressed in FEIR-89-3 and FSEIR-91-3. Potentially Potentially Signfficant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact XII. Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely [5 [] [3 lg impact the City's Threshold Standards? As described below, the proposed project does not adversely impact any of the seen Threshold Standards. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Fire/EMS [] [] [] ~ The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has determined that this threshold standard will be met because fire services would be provided in accord with the Otay Ranch Fire Master Plan and EMS Master Plan. Page- 7 Comments: The Fire Threshold Standard was adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3. The proposed Park Agreement does not result in a change in potential impacts to fire and emergency medical trait response time. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact b) Police [] [] [] I~ The Threshold Standards require that poliee units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes'or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. Comments: The Police Threshold Standard was adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3. The proposed Park Agreement does not result in a change in potential impacts to police response time. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact c) Traffic [] [] [] r~ 1. City-wide: Maintain LOS "C" or better as measured by observed average travel speed on all signalized arterial segments except that during peak hours a LOS "D" can occur for no more than any two hours of the day. 2. West ofi-805: Those signalized intersections which do not meet the standard above may continue to operate at their current 1991 LOS, but shall not worsen. Comments: The Traffic Threshold Standard was adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3, FSEIR-9103, and in Negative Declaration, IS-00-05 that addressed additional traffic impacts associated with an accelerated development phasing schedule. Additional mitigation measures were incorporated in IS-00-05 to reduce traffic impacts to below a level of significan?e. The proposed Park Agreement does not result in a change in potential traffic impacts than those analyzed in the previous environmental documents. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact d) Parks/Recreation [] [] [g [] The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres of neighborhood and community parkland with appropriate facilities per 1,000 residents east of Interstate 805. Page Comments: Parks, Recreation, and Open Space were previously addressed in FEIR 89-3. The proposed Park Agreement results in the addition of 7 acres of park land in the Salt Creek Ranch SPA Plan. The additional park land will allow for the expansion of the approved Rolling Hills Ranch Community Park fi.om 22 acres to 29 acres. The additional park acreage will be used to satisfy park requirements of the EastLake ]III project. The park expansion would result in a larger area to accommodate athletic fields to meet the growing demand in the community. The proposed project would also result in the reduction of 11 dwelling units which results in a decrease in anticipated population. The proposal does not result in a significant impact to the Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact e) Drainage [] [] [] ~ The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Comments: The Drainage Threshold Standard was adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3 and FSEIR-91-3. The subject park site was previously analyzed for development with single family residential land uses, which resulted in the reduction of impervious land surface. Development of the site with additional park land in lieu of single family residences will result in less runoff than previously anticipated in the previous enviromnental documents. Grading and improvement plans are subject to review and approval by the Engineering Department. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact f) Sewer [] [] [] ~ The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Comments: The Sewer Threshold Standard was adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3 and FSEIR-91-3. The proposed project results in an overall reduction in density of 11 dwelling units and a CPF site. The reduction in dwelling units would result in a reduction of sewage volumes than analyzed in the previous environmental document with no change in potential impacts to the Sewer Threshold Standard. Page - 9 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact g) Water [] [] [] ~ The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Comments: FEIR-89-3 adequately addressed the Water Threshold Standard. The proposed project does not change the conclusions of the Water Threshold Standard analysis in the previous environmental document. Potentially XIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. PotentiallySignificantLess than Would the proposal result in a need fOE new SignificantUnless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? [3 [] [] ~ b) Communications systems? [] [2 [] ~ c) Local or regional water treatment or [3 [2 [] ~, distribution facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? [] [] [] ~ e) Storm water drainage? [] [] [] ~ f) Solid waste disposal? [] [] [] ~ Comments: Increase in demand and impacts on utilities were adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3 and FSEIR-91-3. The proposed project does not change the conclusions of the Public Services and Utilities analysis in the previous environmental document. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No XIV. AESTHETICS. Would the proposa[: Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to [] [3 ~[ E the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Page - 10 b) Cause the destruction or modification of a [] [] [] [] scenic route? c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic [] [] [] [] effect? d) Create added light or glare sources that [] [] [] could increase the level of sky glow in an [] area or cause this project to fail to comply with Section 19.66.100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 197 e) Produce an additional amount of spill light? [] [] [] [] Comments: Landform and aesthetic impacts were adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3 and FSEIR-91-3. The proposed park expansion would result in the creation of additional active open space. Development of the subject site with a park would result in an additional amount of spill light due to the proposed athletic fields. However, approved residential land uses to the east are buffered by Duncan Ranch Road, which will result in a less than significant impact. Potentially XV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. IVould the Potentially Significant Less than proposal: Significant Unless Significant No lmpact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of [3 [] [] ~ or the destruction or a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical [] [] [] [~ or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c) Does the proposal have the potential to [] [] [] 0t cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious [] [] [] [X or sacred uses within the potential impact area? e) Is the area identified on the City's General [] [] [] ~ Plan EIR as an area of high potential for archeologlcal resources? Comments: The proposal would not result in any additional impacts to Cultural Resources than those that were adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3 and SFEIR-91-3. The proposed Park Agreement does not result in any additional impacts to cultural resources. Page - 11 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact XVI. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of paleontological resources? Comments: Impacts to prehistoric resources wcrc adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3 and FSEIR-91-3. The proposal does not result in any additional impacts to paleontological resources. Potentially XVII. RECREATION. Would the proposah Potentially Significant Lessthan Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or [] [] [] ~ regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? [] [] ~[ [] c) Interfere with recreation parks & recreation [] [] [] '4 plans or programs? Comments: Impacts to recreation were adequately addressed in FEIR-89-3. The proposal does not result in an increased demand for parks or recreational facilities. Potentially XVIII.MANDATORY FINDINGS OF PotentiallySignificantLess than SignificantUnless Significant No SIGNIFICANCE: See Negative Declaration Impact Mitigated Impact Impact for mandatory findings of significance. If an EIR is needed, this section shouM be completed. a) Does the project have the potential to [] [] [] ~1 degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major per/ods or California history or prehistory? Comments: Sensitive and endangered plants and animals have been adequately addressed in Final EIR 89-3 and Final SEIR 91-03. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact b) Does the project have the potential to [] [] (3 achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Comments: The scope and nature of the project would not result in the curtailment of any long-term environmental goals. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerablen means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Comments: Cumulative impacts were previously addressed in Both FEIR-89-03 and FSEIR-91-03. The proposed project does not result in any additional cumulative project impacts. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact d) Does the project have environmental [] [] [] ~ effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: The proposed project is a Park Agreement will not result in any direct or indirect adverse effects on human beings. Page - 13 - ~. XIX. PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES: No new mitigation will be required for the proposed project other than previously required in IS-00- 05, Final EIR-89-3 and Final SEIR-91-03. XX. AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT MITIGATION MEASURES By signing the line(s) provided below, the Applicant(s) and/or Operator(s) stipulate that they have each read, understood and have their respective company's authority to and do agree~ t~ the mitigation measures contained herein, and will implement same to thc satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator. Failure to sign thc line(s) provided below prior to adoption of the Addendum shall indicate thc Applicants' and/or Operator's desire that the Project be held in abeyance without approval. N/A XXI. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially alTccted by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [] Land Use and Planning [] Transportation/Circulation [] Public Services [] Population and [] Biological Resources [] Utilities and Service Housing Systems [] Geophysical [] Energy and Mineral [81 Aesthetics Resources [] Water [] Hazards [] Cultural Resources [5 Air Quality [] Noise ~ Recreation [] Paleontological [] Mandatory Findings Resources of Significance Page- 14 XXII. DETERMINATION: On thc basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect: 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impacts" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. An addendum has been prepared to provide a record of this determination. Signature Date Marilyn R. F. Ponseggi Environmental Review Coordinator City of Chula Vista RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE PARK AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE EASTLAKE COMPANY AND PACIFIC BAY HOMES, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, a requirement of the city Parkland Dedication Ordinance and the Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the City and EastLake for EastLake III establishes a parkland dedication obligation for 17 acres for EastLake III, not to exceed 7 acres in the EastLake Woods Neighborhood Park; and WHEREAS, EastLake Development Company proposes to provide funds to purchase land within the Rolling Hills Ranch Project in lieu of dedicating parkland within the EastLake Woods project; and WHEREAS, the city Parkland Dedication Ordinance establishes the parkland obligation based upon dwelling units and allows for the provision of payment of in lieu fees for parkland when the City deems it would better serve the public and park and recreation needs of the future residents of a particular subdivision; and WHEREAS, staff believes that the city will realize an increased benefit in the recreational resources available to the residents of Chula Vista and recommends the approval of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, parks are permitted by conditional use in the Single Family Detached (SF-1) land use district; and WHEREAS, the City does not issue itself Conditional Use Permits (CUP), the City, as applicant, will process an application to construct a park facility on the 8-acre subject site by zoning Administrator "Special Process", and WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator Special Process is the same as the Administrative CUP process since it, through the public notice process, provides the opportunity for interested individuals to express any concerns before a determination is made; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator will make an administrative determination based upon any public comments and the criteria and required findings for conditional use permit 1 '/7 ~/... 0 /,:;)~// prescribed in the Salt Creek Ranch Planned Community District Regulations, and Chula vista Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council through approval of this resolution reconfirms the action of the Zoning Administrator; and WHEREAS, as a follow up, a SPA amendment application will be submitted to change the 8-acre subject site from SF-I, single Family Detached, to Parks and Recreation, and to relocate the CPF land use boundaries within Neighborhood 8 to merge the 8-acre subject site to the future community park to the north. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the city of Chula Vista hereby deems that it would better serve the public and park and recreation needs of the future residents of both the EastLake and Rolling Hills Ranch subdivisions to allow The EastLake Company to pay in lieu fees for parkland. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Park Agreement between the City of Chula vista and The EastLake Company and Pacific Bay Homes, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the city Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista. Presented by Approved as to form by and Recreation (~om ~U~ John M. Kaheny city Attorney [H:\HOME\ATTORNEYIRESO\ Park Agreement (December 13, 2000 (1:40pm)] 2 /3 ~ .~~ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item ]9 Meeting Date 12/19/00 ITEM TITLE: Public hearings regarding the declaration by thc City Council of its intention to: (A) making ~ertain determinations and authorizing the submittal of thc levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of certain territories proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 98-1 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 1 ~est & 2]), and (B) making certain determinations and authorizing the submittal o£ the levy o£ special taxes to the qualified electors of certain territory proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 98-2 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 6 & 7]) A. Resolution of thc City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 98-1 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP- SPA One, Villages 1 West & 2]), making certain determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of certain territory proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 98-1 (Interim open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 1 West & 2]) B. Resolution of thc City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 98-2 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP- SPA One, Villages 6 & 7]), making certain determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to thc qualified electors of certain territory proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 98-2 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Prnj¢ct, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 6 & 7J). SUBMITTED BY: Director o£Public Worksl~,/c~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~t 9~" (4/Sths Vote: Yes__ No X ) On November 7, 2000, Council approved resolutions adopting two annexation maps showing the boundaries of the territories proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 98-1 and CFD No. 98-2, as applicable, and declaring its intent to authorize the annexation of certain parcels to such CFDs. Thc City Council also set a public hearing for December 19, 2000 to hear any protest to thc proposed annexations. This public hearing has been published in an adjudicated newspaper o£ general circulation at least seven days prior to tonight's Council meeting. Tonight Council would conduct the public hearing and authorize the submittal of the Levy of Special Taxes to the qualified electors of the respective CFD. RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1. Open the hearing, take public testimony, close the public hearing; /¥-/ Page 2, Item ! ~/ Meeting Date: 12/19/00 2. Approve the resolution acting as the legislative body of Comanunity Facilities District No. 98-1 (Interim open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 1 West & 2]), making certain determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy to special taxes to certain territory proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 98-1; 3. Approve the resolution acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 98-2 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 6 & 7]), making certain determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy to special taxes to certain territory proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 98- 2. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: CFDs 98-1 and 98-2 were formed by Council on September 15, 1998. CFD 98-1 encompasses all parcels within Villages 1 West, 2, 2 West, 6 and 7 owned, at that time, by the Otay Ranch Company. CFD 98-2 encompasses all the parcels within Otay Ranch Villages 6 and 7 owned, at that time, by McMillin. Both CFDs are considered "interim" districts and would levy special taxes on vacant land in order to guarantee the funding of the maintenance of certain landscaping improvements. Those improvements are currently being constructed as a requisite for developing Villages 1 and 5; but the responsibility for their maintenance falls on future Otay Ranch Villages. "Permanent" maintenance districts are prepared to be created with the subsequent development of these Villages to establish the means to finance the maintenance of the improvements on an on-going basis. McMillin is in the process of developing a portion of Village 6 located with CFD 98-2. In order to clearly define their ownership within Villages 6 and 2, McMillin and The Otay Ranch Company are currently conducting a land swap. With the impending land swap, ownership boundaries will change; thus, an adjustment to the boundaries of CFDs 98-1 and 98-2 is needed. This will be accomplished by annexation of the land swap areas into the appropriate CFD and filing the corresponding Notices of Special Tax Lien Cancellation. The proposed land swap would result in a net increase of 3.462 acres to CFD 98-1 and a corresponding net decrease of 3.462 acres to CFD 98-2. The recorded Annexation Maps are shown in Exhibits A and B. The annexed areas will be subject to the provisions of the adopted Rate and Method of Apportionments of the respective CFD (see Exhibits C and D). Staff has determined that the proposed changes would not affect the districts' ability to provide sufficient funding for the operation and maintenance of the improvements related to each respective District. Tonight, Council would conduct the public heating on the proposed annexations and authorize the submittal of the Levy of Special Taxes to the qualified electors within each CFD. In accordance with the law, the public hearing has been published in the Star News at least seven days prior to tonight's Council meeting. Both developers have requested the City to shorten the standard 90-day period to conduct a special election and have executed the required Consent and Waiver Forms. Therefore, the City Clerk has set an election date of January 9, 2001 for casting Page3, Item /~ Meeting Date: 12/19/00 votes on the proposed annexations and the levying of the special tax per the adopted Rate and Method of Apportionment. Resolutions There are two resolutions on today's agenda, which, if adopted, will accomplish the following: The RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF CHULA VISTA acting as the legislative body of CFD 98-1 would make certain determinations regarding the proposed annexation to CFD 98-1, and authorize the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of the proposed annexation parcels to CFD 98-1. The RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF CHULA VISTA acting as the legislative body of CFD 98-2 would make certain determinations regarding the proposed annexation to CFD 98-2, and authorize thc submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of the proposed annexation parcels to CFD 98-2. Staff and legal counsel have reviewed the proposed resolutions and consider them ready for Council approval. Future Actions The City Clerk has set January 9, 2001 at 1:00 pm to hold the election and verify the signatures to authorize the annexations and the levy of special taxes. On or prior to January 9, 2001, the City Clerk shall provide a ballot package to each qualified voter(s) within each of the proposed annexation areas to CFDs 98-1 and 98-2. The election results and completion of the annexations for both CFDs are scheduled for the Council meeting of January 16, 2001. Fiscal Impact All costs of the annexations of the districts are being borne by the developers. The City will receive the benefit of full cost recovery for staff cost involve in district administration. Exhibits: Exhibit A - CFD No. 98-1 Recorded Am~exatinn Map Exhibit B - CFD No. 98-2 Recorded Annexation Map Exhibit C - Rate and Method of Apportionment CFD No. 98-1 Exhibit D - Rate and Method of Apportionment - CFD No. 98-2 H:\HOME\ENGiNEER\LANDDEV~Otay Ranch-McMillin\OR403 F Al 13 VILLAGE 6 PUBLIC HEAKING FOR CFDS.doc 12/7/00 11:23:29 AM EXHIBIT C Community Facility District No. 98-1 Special Tax Report July 1, 1998 Page 6 Part IV - Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes ANNUAL TAX A Special Tax shall be levied annually on land within Community Facilities District No. 98-1 (interim Open Space Maintenance District) of the City of Chula Vista (the "District"), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability determined by the City of Chula Vista (the "City") through'the application of the following procedures. All of the property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by law or the express provisions of the rate and method of apportionment expressed below, shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner provided below. Afl Special Taxes applicable to Parcels shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, and that Special Taxes so levied will be subject to the same penalties and procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes. DEFINITIONS Acre or Acreage means the area of a Parcel as shown on the latest maps of the Assessor of the County of San Diego, or, if the area of such Parcel is not shown on such Assessor's maps, the area as shown on a current recorded subdivision map, parcel map, record of survey or other recorded document creating or describing the Parcel. If the preceding maps are not available, the area shall be determined by the City Engineer. Administrative Expenses means the direct and indirect expenses incurred by the City in carrying out its duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the Special Taxes) including the fees and expenses of its counsel. Any fees of the County related to the District or the collection of Special Taxes, an allocable share of the salaries of City staff directly related thereto, any amounts paid by the City from its general fund with respect to the District, and expenses incurred by the City in undertaking actions to foreclose on properties for which the payment of Special Taxes is delinquent, and all other costs and expenses of the City related to the District. City means the City of Chula Vista District means the Interim Open Space Maintenance District - SPA One (Villages One West, Two West, and portions of Villages Two, Six, Seven and Planning Area 12) of the Community Facilities District No. 98-1 of the City of Chula Vista. Facilities means those improvements defined in Part II of the Special Tax Report dated July 1, 1998 for Community Facilities District No. 98-1 of the City of Chula Vista. Fiscal Year means the pedod starling on July 1 and ending the following June 30. M:/$projecUchulavista/C F D98-1.2 doc /¢¢~ Community Facility District No. 98-1 Special Tax Report July 1, 1998 Page 7 Maximum Special Tax means the maximum special tax that can be levied within CFD No. 98-1 by the City Council in any Fiscal Year for each Parcel of Taxable Property. Operating Fund means a fund that shall be maintained within the District for any Fiscal Year to pay for the-actual costs of maintenance, repair, and replacement of the Facilities, and the Administrative Expenses. Operating Fund Balance means the amount of funds in the Operating Fund at the end of the preceding Fiscal Year. Operating Fund Requirement means for any Fiscal Year an amount equal to the budgeted costs of the maintenance, repair and replacement of the Facilities which have been accepted and maintained by the District or are reasonably expected to be accepted and maintained by the District during the current Fiscal Year plus the budgeted Administrative Expenses of the District for the current Fiscal Year in which Special Taxes are levied. Parcel means any San Diego County Assessor's Parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of the District designated on a map of the San Diego County Assessor and which has been assigned a discrete identifying number on the equalized tax rolls of the County. Reserve Fund means a fund that shall be maintained to provide necessary cash flow for operations and maintenance for the first six months of each Fiscal Year, working capital to cover maintenance and repair cost overruns and delinquencies that may arise in connection with the collection of Special Taxes and a reasonable buffer against large variations in annual special tax amounts. Reserve Fund Balance means the amount of funds in the Reserve Fund at the end of the preceding Fiscal Year. Reserve Fund Requirement means the required balance in the Reserve Fund equal to up to 100% of the Operating Fund Requirement. Special Tax means the special tax or special taxes actually levied within CFD No. 98-1. Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount determined sufficient to pay the costs of the District, including: (i) the amount required to be deposited into the Operating Fund to meet the Operating Fund Requirement, less the Operating Fund Balance, and (ii) the total' amount required to be deposited into the Reserve Fund if any, to meet the Reserve Fund Requirement, less the Reserve Fund Balance. Community. Facility District No. 98-1 Special Tax Report July 1, 1998 Page 8 Taxable Property is all real property or Parcels within the boundaries of the District which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law, or which are not classified or assigned to the Exempt Category as defined herein. Cate,qories of Special Taxes Taxable Category The taxable land category includes each Parcel of Taxable Property assigned to the District (Taxable Ca!egory). The M~dmum Special Tax whichmay be levied on each Parcel within the Taxable Category for Fiscal Year 1998/99 shall be $103 per Acre (said amount to be levied pro rata for any portion of an Acre). Said Maximum SpeCial Tax shall be increased or decreased each Fiscal Year thereafter by a factor which shall be the lesser of the annual percentage change in the January to January San Diego Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (All Items) or the annual percentage change in the estimated California Fourth Quarter Per Capita Personal Income as contained in the Governor's budget published every January. Exempt Category The exempt category includes each property owned by, conveyed or irrevocably offered for dedication to a public agency, land which is in the public right-of-way, unmanned utility easements which make utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement impractical, common areas, private streets and parks, and open space lots (Exempt Category). Assi,qnment to Cateqories of Special Taxes On or about July 1 of each year (but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the Special Taxes on the County's secured tax roll) the City shall assign each Parcel within the District to the Taxable Category, or Exempt Category. Parcels subject to levy shall be determined based upon the records of the San Diego County Assessor. Levy and Apportionment of Special Taxes The City shall determine the Special Tax Liability for the District in each Fiscal Year on or about every July 1 (but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the Special Taxes on the County's secured tax roll). Special Taxes shall then be levied on each Parcel within the District as follows: Step 1: The Special Tax per Acre for Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category shall be calculated as the lessor of: (i) The Special Tax Liability for the District as determined by the City, divided by the total Acres for all Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category, M:/$projectJchulavista/C F D98-1.2.doc /~/- ? Community Facility District No. 98-1 Special Tax Report July 1, 1998 "~, Page 9 OR, (ii) the Maximum Special Tax rate for Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category Step 2: The City shall advise the owner of Parcels within the District of the Special Tax Liability for the next Fiscal Year. · I Step 3: The o,wner(s) of Parcels within the District, may at its election, deposit funds with the City prior to July 15 each Fiscal Year, in an amount equal to the Parcel's Special Tax ~hlch shall be deposited into the Operating Fund and Reserve Fund of the District. Step 4: If the funds deposited with the City is less than the Parcel's Special Tax for the Fiscal "i Year, then a Special Tax shall be levied equal to the Parcel's Special Tax as .~ determined in Step 1 minus any funds deposited for the current Fiscal Year pursuant to Step 3. EXHIBIT D Community Facility District No. 98-2 Special Tax Report July 1, 1998 Page 5 Part IV - Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes ANNUAL TAX A Special Tax shall be levied annually on land within Community Facilities District No. 98-2 (Interim Open Space Maintenance District) of the City of Chula Vista (the "District"), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability determined by the City of Chula Vista (the "City") thr_ough the application of the following procedures. All of the property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by law or the express provisions of the rate and method of apport]dnment expressed below, shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner provided below. All Special Taxes applicable to Parcels shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, and that Special Taxes so levied will be subject to the same penalties and procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes. DEFINITIONS Acre or Acreage means the area of a Parcel as shown on the latest maps of the Assessor of the County of San Diego, or, if the area of such Parcel is not shown on such Assessor's maps, the area as shown on a current recorded subdivision map, parcel map, record of survey or other recorded document creating or describing the Parcel. If the preceding maps are not available, the area shall be determined by the City Engineer. Administrative Expenses means the direct and indirect expenses incurred by the City in , carrying out its duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the Special Taxes) including the fees and expenses of its counsel. Any fees of the County related to the District or the collection of Special Taxes, an allocable share of the salaries of City staff directly related thereto, any amounts paid by the City from its general fund - with respect to the District, and expenses incurred by the City in undertaking actions to foreclose on properties for which the payment of Special Taxes is delinquent, and all other costs and expenses of the City related to the District. City means the City of Chula Vista District means the Interim Open Space Maintenance District - SPA Two (Villages 6 & 7.) of the · Community Facilities District No. 98-2 of the City of Chula Vista. · Facilities means those improvements defined in Part II of the Special Tax Report dated July 1, 1998 for Community Facilities District No. 98-2 of the City of Chula Vista. Fiscal Year means the period starting on July 1 and ending the following June 30. M:/$projectJchulavista/CFD98-2.1.d cc / ¢ - / ~ Community' Facility District No. 98-2 Special Tax Report July 1, 1998 Page 6 Maximum Special Tax means the maximum special tax that can be levied within CFD No. 98-2 by the City Council in any Fiscal Year for each Parcel of Taxable Property. Operating Fund means a fund that shall be maintained within the District for any Fiscal Year to pay for the.actual costs of maintenance, repair, and replacement of the Facilities, and the Administrative Expenses. Operating Eund Balance means the amount of funds in the Operating Fund at the end of the preceding Fiscal Year. Operating Fund Requirement means for any Fiscal Year an amount equal to the budgeted costs of the maintenance, repair and replacement of the Facilities which have been accepted and maintained by the District or are reasonably expected to be accepted and maintained by the District during the current Fiscal Year plus the budgeted Administrative Expenses of the District for the current Fiscal Year in which Special Taxes are levied. Parcel means any San Diego County Assessor's Parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of the District designated on a map of the San Diego County Assessor and which has been assigned a discrete identifying number on the equalized tax rolls of the County. Reserve Fund means a fund that shall be maintained to provide necessary cash flow for operations and maintenance for the first six months of each Fiscal Year, working capital to cover maintenance and repair cost overruns and delinquencies that may arise in connection with the collection of Special Taxes and a reasonable buffer against large variations in annual special tax amounts. Reserve Fund Balance means the amount of funds in the Reserve Fund at the end of the preceding Fiscal Year. Reserve Fund Requirement means the required balance in the Reserve Fund equal to up to 100% of the Operating Fund Requirement. Special Tax means the special tax or special taxes actually levied within CFD No. 98-2. Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount determined sufficient to pay the costs of the District, including: (i) the amount required to be deposited into the Operating Fund to meet the Operating Fund Requirement, less the Operating Fund Balance, and (ii) the total amount required to be deposited into the Reserve Fund if any, to meet the Reserve Fund Requirement, tess the Reserve Fund Balance. Taxable Property is all real property or Parcels within the boundaries of the District which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law, or which are not classified or assigned to the Exempt Category as defined herein. M:/$project/chulavista/CFD98-2.1.doc / ¢¢'// Community Facility District No. 98-2 Special Tax Report July 1, 1998 Page 7 Cateqories of Special Taxes Taxable Category The taxable land category includes each Parcel of Taxable Property assigned to the District (Taxable Category). The Maximum 'Special Tax which may be levied on each Parcel within the Taxable Category for Fiscal Ye~ ~1998/99 shall be $47.52 per Acre (said amount to be levied pro rata for any portion of an Acre). Said Maximum Special Tax shall be increased or decreased each Fiscal Year thereafter by a factor which shall be the lesser of the annual percentage change in the January to January San Diego Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (All Items) or the annual percentage change in the estimated California Fourth Quarter Per Capita Personal Income as contained in the Governor's budget published every January. Exempt Category The exempt category includes each property owned by. conveyed or irrevocably offered for dedication to a public agency, land which is in the public right-of-way, unmanned utility easements which make utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement impractical, common areas, private streets and parks, and open space lots ("Exempt Category"). to Cateqories of Special Taxes Assiqnment On or about July 1 of each year (but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the Special Taxes on the County's secured tax roll) the City shall assign each Parcel within the District to the Taxable Category, or Exempt Category. Parcels subject to levy shall be determined based upon the records of the San Diego County Assessor. Levy and Apportionment of Special Taxes The City shall determine the Special Tax Liability for the District in each Fiscal Year on or about every July 1 (but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the Special Taxes on the County's secured tax roll). Special Taxes shall then be levied on each Parcel within the District as follows: Step 1: The Special Tax for Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category shall be calculated as the lessor of: (i) The Special Tax Liability for the District as determined by the City, divided by the total Acres for all Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category, OR, M:/,project/chulavista/CFD98-2.1.,oc / ~ -- 1 ~ Community Facility District No. 98-2 Special Tax Report July 111998 Page 8 (ii) the Maximum Special Tax rate for Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category Step 2: The City shall advise the owner of Parcels within the District of the Special Tax Liability for the next Fiscal Year. Step 3: The o,wner(s) of Parcels within the District, may at its election, deposit funds with the City prior to July 15 of each Fiscal Year, in an amount equal to the Parcel's Special Ta~(' which shall be deposited into the Operating Fund and Reserve Fund of the Step 4: If the funds deposited with the City are less than the Parcel's Special Tax obligation for the Fiscal Year, then a Special Tax shall be levied equal to the Parcel's Special Tax as determined in Step 1 minus any funds deposited for the current Fiscal Year pursuant to Step 3. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 1 WEST & 2]), MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CERTAIN TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 1 WEST & 2]) WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA (the "City Council"), has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof(the "Act") and the City of Chula Vista Community Facilities District Ordinance enacted pursuant to the powers reserved by the City of Chula Vista under Sections 3, 5 and 7 of Article XI of the Constitution of the State of California (the "Ordinance") (the Act and the Ordinance may be referred to collectively as the "Community Facilities District Law"). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP- SPA ONE, VILLAGES 1 WEST & 2]) (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District, the extent of the territory to be annexed (the "Annexation Area"), the furnishing of certain public services and all other related matters has been given; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half (1/2) or more of the area ofland within the Annexed Area or within District; and, WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve (12) persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners ofthe Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct. /1/-/1-/ SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this City Council that: A. all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements oflaw, and specifically the provisions of the Community Facilities District Law, and this finding is made pursuant to the provisions and authorization of Section 53325.1 of the Government Code of the State of California; B. the annexation to the District as proposed conforms with the City ofChula Vista Statement of Goals and Policies Regarding the Establishment of Community Facilities Districts; C. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close ofthe public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area; D. the time limit specified by the Community Facilities District Law for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area; E. the City Clerk, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of any resolution annexing the Annexation Area to the District; and F. the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation Area. SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA The boundaries and parcels ofland in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses for the public services described in Section 5 below are generally described as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled "Annexation Map No.1 To Community Facilities District No. 98-1 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 1 West & 2]), City OfChula Vista, County Of San Diego, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is on file in the Engineering Division, ofthe City ofChula Vista, and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 5. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services that are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are certain services which are in addition to those 2 /'ffJ-()- services required for the territory within District and will not be replacing services already available. A general description of the services authorized to be financed by the levy of special taxes within the District is as follows: The maintenance and servlcmg of public facilities including irrigation, cultivation, installation and replacement of plant material, tree trimming and necessary supplies, personnel, utility and equipment costs; contract services where applicable; maintenance and servicing of parks, parkway landscaping and medians, drainage facilities, pedestrian bridges and open space slopes, trails and walls. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide such monitoring, maintenance, operation and management of such property. The same types of services which are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are the types of services proposed to be financed from the special taxes proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible such services shall be provided in common with District and the Annexation Area. SECTION 6. SPECIAL TAX Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for such services required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "A" which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the special tax that such person will have to pay. The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this City Council may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the City of Chula Vista, acting for and on behalf of the District. SECTION 7. ELECTION The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (I) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed territory. The special election shall be held on the 9th DAY OF JANUARY, 2001, and said election shall be a special election to be conducted by the City Clerk (hereinafter "Election Official"). If the proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax may be levied as provided for in this Resolution and the City Council may determine that the Annexation Area is added to and part of the District. 3 /~fI'3 SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 1 WEST & 2]) AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY Shall Community Facilities District No. 98-1 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 1 West & 2]) ofthe City ofChula Vista be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on "Annexation Map No. I To Community Facilities District No. 98-1 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 1 West & 2]), City Of Chula Vista, County Of San Diego, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map") pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the "Special Tax Formula") set forth in Resolution No. to finance authorized services and administrative expenses and to fund and replenish a reserve fund, all as provided for in the Special Tax Formula? SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "YES" shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct ofthe election. B. Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots, tally sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law. E. Receive the returns of the election. 4 ;.JfI-1 F. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. 1. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct ofthe election in the manner and form as required by law. PREPARED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: ~A;!~ J4rtKaheny - 0 city Attorney John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works 5 " ,) /' jii!:-.J . . . ! j , I ~ 'I J I -J , ., J 1,-, ~ , I; ;'7 ! ---1 j" -1 ~'l '1 ,~ j ] ] . 1 '} J ] ] EXHIBIT "A" Community Facility District i~U. 90,'1 July 1,1998 Page 6 Special Tax Report Part IV - Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes ANNUAL TAX A Special Tax shall be levied annually on land within Community Facilities District No 98-1 (Interim Open Space Maintenance District) of the City of Chula Vista (the "District"), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability determined by the City of Chula Vista (the 'City") through'the application of the following procedures. All of the property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by law or the express provisions of the rate and method of apportionment expressed below, shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner provided below. All Special Taxes applicable to Parcels shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, and that Special Taxes so levied will be subject to the same penalties and procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes. DEFINITIONS Acre or Acreage means the area of a Parcel as shown on the latest maps of the Assessor of the County of San Diego, or, if the area of such Parcel is not shown on such Assessor's maps, the area as shown on a current recorded subdivision map, parcel map, record of surveyor other recorded document creating or describing the Parcel. If the preceding maps are not available, the area shall be determined by the City Engineer. Administrative Expenses means the direct and indirect expenses incurred by the City in carrying out its duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the Special Taxes) including the fees and expenses of its counsel Any fees of the County related to the District or the collection of Special Taxes, an allocable share of the salaries of City staff directly related thereto, any amounts paid by the City from its general fund with respect to the District, and expenses incurred by the City in undertaking actions to foreclose on properties for which the payment of Special Taxes is delinquent, and all other costs and expenses of the City related to the District. City means the City of Chula Vista District means the Interim Open Space Maintenance District, SPA One (Villages One West, Two West, and portions of Villages Two, Six, Seven and Planning Area 12) of the Community Facilities District No. 98-1 of the City of Chula Vista. Facilities means those improvements defined in Part II of the Special Tax Report dated July 1, 1998 for Community Facilities District No. 98-1 of the City of Chula Vista. Fiscal Year means the period starting on July 1 and ending the following June 3D. M:/Sprojectlchulavista/CFD9B-l.2.doc /lfA-& J - ] j L J ~ Community Facility District No. 98-1 July 1,1998 Page 7 Special Tax Report Maximum Special Tax means the maximum special tax that can be levied within CFD No. 98-1 by the City Council in any Fiscal Year for each Parcel of Taxable Property. Operating Fund means a fund that shall be maintained within the District for any Fiscal Year to pay for the-actual costs of maintenance, repair, and replacement of the Facilities, and the Administrative Expenses. , i ~ ] L J L J Operating Fund Balance means the amount of funds in the Operating Fund at the end of the preceding Fiscal Year. Operating Fund Requirement means for any Fiscal Year an amount equal to the budgeted costs of the maintenance, repair and replacement of the Facilities which have been accepted and maintained by the District or are reasonably expected to be accepted and maintained by the District during the current Fiscal Year plus the budgeted Administrative Expenses of the District for the current Fiscal Year in which Special Taxes are levied. L J I J I 1 ,. I I 1 .. I i , Parcel means any San Diego County Assessor's Parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of the District designated on a map of the San Diego County Assessor and which has been assigned a discrete identifying number on the equalized tax rolls of the County. Reserve Fund means a fund that shall be maintained to provide necessary cash flow for operations and maintenance for the first six months of each Fiscal Year, working capital to cover maintenance and repair cost overruns and delinquencies that may arise in connection with the collection of Special Taxes and a reasonable buffer against large variations in annual special tax amounts. ] Reserve Fund Balance means the amount of funds in the Reserve Fund at the end of the preceding Fiscal Year. Reserve Fund Requirement means the required balance in the Reserve Fund equal to up to 100% of the Operating Fund Requirement. ] ] Special Tax means the special tax or special taxes actually levied within CFD No. 98-1. I Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount determined sufficient to pay the costs of the District, including: (i) the amount required to be deposited into the Operating Fund to meet the Operating Fund Requirement, less the Operating Fund Balance, and (ii) the total amount required to be deposited into the Reserve Fund if any, to meet the Reserve Fund Requirement, less the Reserve Fund Balance. I MJSprojecllchulavistafCFD98-1.2.doc /Lffl-f' J Community Facility District No. 98-1 July 1,1998 Page 8 Special Tax Report ] J Taxable Property is all real property or Parcels within the boundaries of the District which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law, or which are not classified or assigned to the Exempt Category as defined herein. Cateqories of Special Taxes -- J -- J Taxable Category The taxable land category includes each Parcel of Taxable Property assigned to the District (Taxable Ca\egory). ] The Maximum Special Tax which.may be levied on each Parcel within the Taxable Category for Fiscal Year 1998/99 shall be $~1 03 per Acre (said amount to be levied pro rata for any portion of an Acre). Said Maximum Special Tax shall be increased or decreased each Fiscal Year thereafter by a factor which shall be the lesser of the annual percentage change in the January to January San Diego Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (All Items) or the annual percentage change in the estimated California Fourth Quarter Per Capita Personal Income as contained in the Governor's budget published every January. -. J 1 ..1 J Exempt Category ] The exempt category includes each property owned by, conveyed or irrevocably offered for dedication to a public agency, land which is in the public right-of-way, unmanned utility easements which make utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement impractical, common areas, private streets and parks, and open space lots (Exempt Category). ] Assiqnment to Cateaories of Special Taxes ] On or about July 1 of each year (but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the Special Taxes on the County's secured tax roll) the City shall assign each Parcel within the District to the Taxable Category, or Exempt Category. Parcels subject to levy shall be determined based upon the records of the San Diego County Assessor. I Levv and Apportionment of Special Taxes The City shall determine the Special Tax Liability for the District in each Fiscal Year on or about every July 1 (but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the Special Taxes on the County's secured tax roll). Special Taxes shall then be levied on each Parcel within the District as follows: Step 1: The Special Tax per Acre for Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category shall be calculated as the lessor of: (i) The Special Tax Liability for the District as determined by the City, divided by the total Acres for all Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category, M:I$projectlchulavistafCF09B-1.2.doc /'-111-(: " ,- Community Facility District No. 98-1 July 1, 1998 Page 9 Special Tax Report .' :1 OR, (ii) the Maximum Special Tax rate for Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category '1 .' Step 2: The City shall advise the owner of Parcels within the District of the Special Tax Liability for the next Fiscal Year. " .! Step 3: The owner(s) of Parcels within the District, may at its election, deposit funds with the City prior to July 15 each Fiscal Year, in an amount equal to the Parcel's Special Tax v.;hich shall be deposited into the Operating Fund and Reserve Fund of the District. " ! .' .' Step 4: If the funds deposited with the City is less than the Parcel's Special Tax for the Fiscal Year, then a Special Tax shall be levied equal to the Parcel's Special Tax 2S determined in Step 1 minus any funds deposited for the current Fiscal Year pursuant to Step 3. .. .' .. " ., .; ~ . I MJ$projectlchulavista/CFD98-1.2.doc / if/!- '1 ORDER OF PROCEDURE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT lOT A Y PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SP A ONE, VILLAGES 1 WEST & 2]) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 19, 2000 PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION: PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT lOT A Y PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SP A ONE, VILLAGES 1 WEST & 2]) AND THE AUTHORIZATION TO LEVY A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY MAYOR: 'This is the time and place for the public hearing relating to COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1. This public hearing relates to the proposed annexation of territory to such District and the authorization to levy a special tax within the territory proposed to be annexed to the District." CITY CLERK: "Notice of the public hearing has been given in the form and manner as required by law." STAFF: General presentation of the following: A. Boundaries of the District; B. Extent of territory proposed to be annexed to the District; C. Explanation of services proposed to be financed; and D. Explanation of rate and apportionment formula for special tax. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHOULD BE COPIED AND DELIVERED TO EACH MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. END OF STAFF REPORT -- OPEN FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION /'-111- /0 MAYOR: STAFF: CITY COUNCIL: MAYOR: CITY COUNCIL: "I would request that each person who speaks give his name and address, and state whether he is the owner of property located in Community Facilities District No. 98-1 or the territory proposed to be annexed to such District, or a registered voter residing within Community Facilities District No. 98-1 or the territory proposed to be annexed to such District. I would now ask staff to provide the final protest count of registered voters and owners, if any." Final presentation of protest count of registered voters and owners (% of area). Discussion on proceedings, any changes and modifications as appropriate, and explanation of alternates available. Declare the public hearing CLOSED. IF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY WISHES TO PROCEED: Adopt RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CERTAIN TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SP A ONE, VILLAGES I WEST & 2]) 2 ILl/ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-2 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 6 &7]), MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CERTAIN TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-2 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 6 &7]) WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA (the "City Council"), has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part I, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code ofthe State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof (the "Act") and the City of Chula Vista Community Facilities District Ordinance enacted pursuant to the powers reserved by the City of Chula Vista under Sections 3, 5 and 7 of Article XI of the Constitution of the State of California (the "Ordinance") (the Act and the Ordinance may be referred to collectively as the "Community Facilities District Law"). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-2 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP- SPA ONE, VILLAGES 6 &7]) (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District, the extent of the territory to be annexed (the "Annexation Area"), the furnishing of certain public services and all other related matters has been given; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half (112) or more of the area ofland within the Annexed Area or within District; and, WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve (12) persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I . RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct. ;1-8-1 SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this City Council that: A. all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Community Facilities District Law, and this finding is made pursuant to the provisions and authorization of Section 53325.1 of the Government Code of the State of California; B. the annexation to the District as proposed conforms with the City ofChula Vista Statement of Goals and Policies Regarding the Establishment of Community Facilities Districts; C. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area; D. the time limit specified by the Community Facilities District Law for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area; E. the City Clerk, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of any resolution annexing the Annexation Area to the District; and F. the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation Area. SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA The boundaries and parcels ofland in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses for the public services described in Section 5 below are generally described as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled "Annexation Map No. I To Community Facilities District No. 98-2 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 6 &7]), City OfChula Vista, County Of San Diego, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is on file in the Engineering Division of the City ofChula Vista and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 5. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services that are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are certain services which are in addition to those services required for the territory within District and will not be replacing services already available. A 2 I i../ {),.. I ,L , .- ,. general description of the services authorized to be financed by the levy of special taxes within the District is as follows: The maintenance and servlcmg of public facilities including irrigation, cultivation, installation and replacement of plant material, tree trimming and necessary supplies, personnel, utility and equipment costs; contract services where applicable; maintenance and servicing of parks, parkway landscaping and medians, drainage facilities, pedestrian bridges and open space slopes, trails and walls. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide such monitoring, maintenance, operation and management of such property. The same types of services which are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are the types of services proposed to be financed from the special taxes proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible such services shall be provided in common with District and the Annexation Area. SECTION 6. SPECIAL TAX Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for such services required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "A" which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the special tax that such person will have to pay. The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this City Council may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the City of Chula Vista, acting for and on behalf of the District. SECTION 7. ELECTION The proposition related to the levy ofthe special tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (I) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed territory. The special election shall be held on the 9th DAY OF JANUARY, 2001, and said election shall be a special election to be conducted by the City Clerk (hereinafter "Election Official"). Ifthe proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax may be levied as provided for in this Resolution and the City Council may determine that the Annexation Area is added to and part of the District. SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election 3 I L/ /3- 3 shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-2 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 6 &7]) AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY Shall Community Facilities District No. 98-2 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 6 &7]) of the City of Chula Vista be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on "Annexation Map No. I To Community Facilities District No. 98-2 (Interim Open Space District [Otay Project, LLC-OVP-SPA One, Villages 6 &7]), City OfChula Vista, County Of San Diego, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map") pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the "Special Tax Formula") set forth in Resolution No. _ to finance authorized services and administrative expenses and to fund and replenish a reserve fund, all as provided for in the Special Tax Formula? SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "YES" shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct ofthe election. B. Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots, tally sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law. E. Receive the returns of the election. F. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the 4 /'-113-1 returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. 1. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required by law. PREPARED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works 5 / t.f I>' ~ EXHIBIT "A" Community Facility District No 98-2 July 1, 1998 Page 5 Special Tax Report Part IV _ Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes ANNUAL TAX A Special Tax shall be levied annually on land within Community Facilities District No. 98-2 (Interim Open Space Maintenance District) of the City of Chula Vista (the "District"), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability determined by the City of Chula Vista (the "City") through the application of the following procedures. All of the property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by law or the express provisions of the rate and method of apportionment expressed below, shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner provided below. All Special Taxes applicable to Parcels shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, and that Special Taxes so levied will be subject to the same penalties and procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes. DEFINITIONS Acre or Acreage means the area of a Parcel as shown on the latest maps of the Assessor of the County of San Diego, or, if the area of such Parcel is not shown on such Assessor's maps, the area as shown on a current recorded subdivision map, parcel map, record of surveyor other recorded document creating or describing the Parcel. If the preceding maps are not available, the area shall be determined by the City Engineer . t Administrative Expenses means the direct and indirect expenses incurred by the City in carrying out its duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the Special Taxes) including the fees and expenses of its counsel. Any fees of the County related to the District or the collection of Special Taxes, an allocable share of the salaries of City staff directly related thereto, any amounts paid by the City from its general fund with respect to the District, and expenses incurred by the City in undertaking actions to foreclose on properties for which the payment of Special Taxes is delinquent, and all other costs and expenses of the City related to the District. J 9 J , City means the City of Chula Vista '1 -' District means the Interim Open Space Maintenance District - SPA Two (Villages 6 & 7.) of the Community Facilities District No. 98-2 of the City of Chula Vista. .1 ! ..; Facilities means those improvements defined in Part II of the Special Tax Report dated July 1. 1998 for Community Facilities District No. 98-2 of the City of Chula Vista. 'j " -' Fiscal Year means the period starting on July 1 and ending the following June 30. .. , ..J , M:/sprojectlChulavista/CFD98-2.1.doc .~ . '" r Community Facility District No 98-2 July 1,1998 Page 6 Special Tax Report . Maximum Special Tax means the maximum special tax that can be levied within CFD No. 98-2 by the City Council in any Fiscal Year for each Parcel of Taxable Property. j ... I .4 J I. 1 I: I l~ ~ II ~ II I".~ , , II If ~ II " ,) 1 U 11 ~ I' I~ t~ Operating Fund means a fund that shall be maintained within the District for any Fiscal Year to pay for the. actual costs of maintenance, repair, and replacement of the Facilities, and the Administrative Expenses. Operating F:und Balance means the amount of funds in the Operating Fund at the end of the preceding Fiscal Year. Operating Fund Requirement means for any Fiscal Year an amount equal to the budgeted costs of the maintenance, repair and replacement of the Facilities which have been accepted and maintained by the District or are reasonably expected to be accepted and maintained by the District during the current Fiscal Year plus the budgeted Administrative Expenses of the District for the current Fiscal Year in which Special Taxes are levied. Parcel means any San Diego County Assessor's Parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of the District designated on a map of the San Diego County Assessor and which has been assigned a discrete identifying number on the equalized tax rolls of the County. Reserve Fund means a fund that shall be maintained to provide necessary cash flow for operations and maintenance for the first six months of each Fiscal Year, working capital to cover maintenance and repair cost overruns and delinquencies that may arise in connection with the collection of Special Taxes and a reasonable buffer against large variations in annual special tax amounts. Reserve Fund Balance means the amount of funds in the Reserve Fund at the end of the preceding Fiscal Year. Reserve Fund Requirement means the required balance in the Reserve Fund equal to up to 100% of the Operating Fund Requirement. Special Tax means the special tax or special taxes actually levied within CFD No. 98-2. Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount determined sufficient to pay the costs of the District, including: (i) the amount required to be deposited into the Operating Fund to meet the Operating Fund Requirement, less the Operating Fund Balance, and (ii) the total amount required to be deposited into the Reserve Fund if any, to meet the Reserve Fund Requirement, less the Reserve Fund Balance. Taxable Property is all real property or Parcels within the boundaries of the District which are not exempt from the SpeCial Tax pursuant to law, or which are not classified or assigned to the Exempt Category as defined herein. M:/SprojectJchulavista/CFD98-2.1.doc 1 -, , I ~ J ~ 111 ! .' j "/ J II! I j 11 ., -.J ~ J .J j ~ III , -3 I , J ..1 ,[ 4' ~ Jl ! ., llr, . ~ 1111 , 'I ., Community Facility District No 98-2 July 1, 1998 Page 7 Special Tax Report Cateoories of Special Taxes Taxable Category The taxable land category includes each Parcel of Taxable Property assigned to the District (Taxable Category). The Maximum Special Tax which may be levied on each Parcel within the Taxable Category for Fiscal YeEi 1998/99 shall be $47.52 per Acre (said amount to be levied pro rata for any portion of an Acre). Said Maximum Special Tax shall be increased or decreased each Fiscal Year thereafter by a factor which shall be the lesser of the annual percentage change in the January to January San Diego Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (All Items) or the annual percentage change in the estimated California Fourth Quarter Per Capita Personal Income as contained in the Governor's budget published every January. Exempt Category The exempt category includes each property owned by, conveyed or irrevocably offered for dedication to a public agency, land which is In the public right-of-way. unmanned utility easements which make utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement impractical, common areas, private streets and parks, and open space lots ("Exempt Category"). Assionment to Cateoories of Special Taxes On or about July 1 of each year (but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the Special Taxes on the County's secured tax roll) the City shall assign each Parcel within the District to the Taxable Category, or Exempt Category. Parcels subject to levy shall be determined based upon the records of the San Diego County Assessor Levy and Apportionment of Special Taxes The City shall determine the Special Tax Liability for the District in each Fiscal Year on or about every July 1 (but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the Special Taxes on the County's secured tax roll). Special Taxes shall then be levied on each Parcel within the District as follows: Step 1: The Special Tax for Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category shall be calculated as the lessor of: (i) The Special Tax Liability for the District as determined by the City, divided by the total Acres for all Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category, OR, M:lSprojectlchulavista/CFD98-2.1.doc -: ,~ Community Facility District No. 93-2 July 1, 1998 Page 8 Special Tax Report r (, (ii) the Maximum Special Tax rate for Parcels assigned to the Taxable Category f'1 I 'I Step 2: The City shall advise the owner of Parcels within the District of the Special Tax Liability for the next Fiscal Year. (1 .' Step 3: The owner(s) of Parcels within the District, may at its election, deposit funds with the City prior to July 15 of each Fiscal Year, in an amount equal to the Parcel's Special Tax which shall be deposited into the Operating Fund and Reserve Fund of the "District. r, i _I '1 Step 4: If the funds deposited with the City are less than the Parcel's Special Tax obligation for .1 the Fiscal Year, then a Special Tax shall be levied equal to the Parcel's Special Tax as determined in Step 1 minus any funds deposited for the current Fiscal Year pursuant to J Step 3. Ii I j J ., J "l J I] I -' ., J , ~ oJ " I ., ~ " L M:/SprojecUchulavista/CFD98-2.1.doc . ORDER OF PROCEDURE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-2 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTA Y PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 6 &7]) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 19,2000 PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION: PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-2 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT [OTAY PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 6 &7]) AND THE AUTHORIZATION TO LEVY A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY MAYOR: "This is the time and place for the public hearing relating to COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-2. This public hearing relates to the proposed annexation of territory to such District and the authorization to levy a special tax within the territory proposed to be annexed to the District." CITY CLERK: "Notice of the public hearing has been given in the form and manner as required by law." STAFF: General presentation of the following: A. Boundaries of the District; B. Extent of territory proposed to be annexed to the District; C. Explanation of services proposed to be financed; and D. Explanation of rate and apportionment formula for special tax. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHOULD BE COPIED AND DELIVERED TO EACH MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. END OF STAFF REPORT -- OPEN FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION /4 , :'\ 1,,-)- / j MAYOR: STAFF: CITY COUNCIL: MAYOR: CITY COUNCIL: "I would request that each person who speaks give his name and address, and state whether he is the owner of property located in Community Facilities District No. 98-2 or the territory proposed to be annexed to such District, or a registered voter residing within Community Facilities District No. 98-2 or the territory proposed to be annexed to such District. I would now ask staff to provide the final protest count of registered voters and owners, if any." Final presentation of protest count of registered voters and owners (% of area). Discussion on proceedings, any changes and modifications as appropriate, and explanation of alternates available. Declare the public hearing CLOSED. IF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY WISHES TO PROCEED: Adopt RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CERTAIN TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-2 (INTERIM OPEN SPACE DISTRICT lOT A Y PROJECT, LLC-OVP-SPA ONE, VILLAGES 6 &7]) 2 F-/ I~' / / CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM NO.: /5 MEETING DATE: 12/19/00 ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE 1999-2004 PLANNING PERIOD RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65585.1 FOR THE 1999-2004 HOUSING ELEMENT CYCLE AND ADOPT A REVISED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS-00-08) SUBMITTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGER ~_l~ 4/STHS VOTE: YES BACKGROUND The California State Legislature has identified the attainment of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian as the State's major housing goal. I~ecognizing the important role of local planning and housing programs in the pursuit of this goal, the Legislature has mandated that all cities and counties prepare a Housing Element as part of the comprehensive General Plan. The City of Chula Vista has prepared the Housing Element update for the 1999- 2004 planning period (Exhibit 4). The Environmental Review Coordinator has concluded that there would be no significant environmental effects resulting from the adoption on the Housing Element update of the City's General Plan for the 1999-2004 planning period and a Revised Negative Declaration (IS-00-08) has been prepared (Exhibit 5). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the resoJution adopting the City of Chula Vista Housing Element of the General Plan in compliance with Government Code Section 65585.1 for the 1999-2004 Housing Element cycle and adopt a revised Negative Declaration (IS-00-08). BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION On July 7, 1999, the Housing Advisory Commission held a meeting to review and consider a PAGE 2, ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: 12/19/00 recommendation on the proposed preliminary goals and policy revisions of the Element, the Citizen Participation Process, and the self-cedification of the City's Housing Element. Additionally, on July 13, 1999, the City Council adopted the Regional Housing Needs Statement produced by SANDAG and provided comments on the proposed preliminary goals and policy revisions for the 1999-2004 Housing Element update. On November 15, 2000, the Housing Advisory Commission and the Planning Commission held public hearings to consider the City of Chula Vista Housing Element of the General Plan. Both Commissions approved a recommendation to the City Council to adopt the Element and the Revised Negative Declaration (IS-00-08). The Negative Declaration was placed on the May 15, 2000 Resource Conservation Commission (RCC) agenda, however the meeting was cancelled due to lack of a quorum. DISCUSSION Pursuant to State Law, Chula Vista is required to prepare a Housing Element that covers the period of July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2004. Recent legislation has allowed the San Diego region to extend the deadline to adopt the Housing Element due to the delays in the adoption of the 1999 Regional Housing Needs Statement by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). These delays have subsequently led to further delays for the adoption of the City's Housing Element. The Housing Element includes the following components: · An analysis of the City's population, household, and employment base, and the characteristic of the housing stock. · A summary of the present and projected housing needs of the City. · A review of potential constraints to meeting the City's identified housing needs. · An evaluation of opportunities that will further the development of new housing. · A statement of the Housing Plan to address the identified needs. NEEDS ASSESSMENT The City's housing goals, policies, and programs are based upon the characteristics of the City's population, housing and employment according to 1998 and 1999 data and information available from SANDAG, the State Department of Finance, 1990 U.S. Census and the City of Chula Vista. POPULATION/HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS · The median household income for Chula Vista residents is $42,516, slightly higher than the San Diego County region's median income of $42,350. · The City's population is diverse in race/ethnicity with 44 percent of the population white (non-hispanic) and 42 percent is Hispanic (all races). PAGE 3, ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: 12/19/00 · Household size is at 3 persons per household and the region is at 2.83 persons per household. EMPLOYMENT · Employment Base will grow by more than 47 percent between 1995 and 2005, with the majority of growth in the retail, service, and government sector. HOUSING STOCK · High rate of new construction anticipated due to the many approved master planned communities in the City. · Reinvestment in the well-established neighborhoods in Western Chula Vista continues to be needed. · Approximately 24 percent of the City's housing will be 50 years or older by 2004. · A homeownership rate of 53 percent is nearly the same as the San Diego County region's rate of 54 percent. · The Iow vacancy rate of 1.1 percent indicates likely increases in housing costs and the potential for overcrowding. · The median housing cost (resale) of $177,000 is 9 percent less than the San Diego County region's median cost of $195,500. · Average rents are 10 to 30 percent lower than the region wide average rents. EVALUATION During the 1991-1999 planning period, Chula Vista consistently provided a variety of new housing oppodunities in seeking to achieve a "balanced community". Two sets of goals, as established by SANDAG, were set forth in the current Housing Element cycle (1991-1999). The first goal is the Regional Share of new home construction needs of all income groups. Regional Share of Housing 1991-1999 Description Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate TOTAL Regional Share 1,232 628 131 335 2,326 Actual Units Built 133 261 1,013 4,803 6,210 Difference -1,099 - 367 882 4,468 3,884 The City made progress towards providing its share of new construction, but fell short in the very Iow and Iowdncome categories. The second goal, which is considered a more reasonable and attainable goal, is the City's "Fair Share" of the affordable housing needed. The Fair Share goal represents the affordable housing opportunities to be created through new construction, rehabilitation, preservation, homebuyer assistance or rental assistance. During the 1991-1999 planning period, the City was able to PAGE 4, ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: 12/19/00 meet its Affordable Housing Fair Share goal by creating 1,796 affordable housing opportunities, 738 more than its goal. Affordable Housing Fair Share Goals 1991-1999 Description Total Fair Share 1,058 Housing Opportunities Provided 1,796 New Construction 215 Rental Assistance 937 Rehab & Preservation 513 First Time Homebuyer 99 Transitional Housing 32 Difference 738 The majority of housing opportunities provided were through rental assistance programs (52%) and the rehabilitation or preservation of existing affordable housing (29%). Only 53 of the 1,796 (3%) affordable housing opportunities were provided through the new construction of units under the City's Balanced Communities Affordable Housing Program. GOALS AND POLICIES The centerpiece of the Element is the comprehensive Housing Plan with goals, policies, and implementing programs to address the identified needs. Many of the goals, policies and programs remain the same as the current Housing Element. In substantial compliance with the requirements of State, the City will be striving to provide programs to meet the current and future housing needs of all income levels of the community through the following goals: 1) Conserve existing affordable housing opportunities; 2) Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Chula Vista; 3) Ensure that an adequate and diverse housing supply is available to meet the City's existing and future needs; 4) Increase home ownership opportunities for Iow and moderate-income households; 5) Enable homeless individuals and families to find permanent housing 6) Encourage energy and waste conservation as an integral part of homes; 7) Promote equal opportunity for all residents to reside in housing of their choice; and 8) Reduction and/or removal to the greatest extent possible of identified constraints to the development, maintenance, and improvement of housing. Each of these goals has a set of policies and programs, which include objectives for the 1999- 2004 Housing Element cycle. Through the eighteen policies and programs set forth in the Element, the City will be striving to produce a total of 2,171 affordable housing opportunities/housing units to lower income households, based upon the affordable housing PAGE 5, ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: 12/19/00 upcoming planning period. HOUSEHOLDS ASSISTED DESCRIPTION NO. % Rehab & Preservation of Existing Housing & Neighborhoods Preserve At-Risk 41 2% SF/MH Rehabilitation 250 12% Caring Neighbors 500 23% Rental Rehabilitation ] 20 6% Christmas in Odober 25 1% New Construction Affordable Housing Program - Low Income 460 21% State Density Bonus 10 .5% Mixed Use Developments 100 5% Rental Assistance Shored Housing I 350 I 16% First Time Homebuyer First Time Home Buyer- Affordable Housing Program 130 6% Mortgage Credit Certificate 25 1% Homeless Assistance Transitional Housing J 10 J .5% Miscellaneous Fair Housing Assistance 150 7% Total 2,171 100% The malaria/ of the anticipated housing activities to be undertaken during the 1999-2004 planning period are the rehabilitation or preservation of existing affordable housing (43%) and new construction of units (26%). Citizen Participation Process The Community Development Department and Planning and Building Department solicited community input in preparing and reviewing the City's Five-Year Housing Element. On July 7, 1999, the Housing Advisory Commission held a meeting to review and consider a recommendation on the proposed preliminary goals and policy revisions of the Element, the Citizen Participation Process, and the self-certification of the City's Housing Element. Additionally, on July 13, 1999, the City Council adopted the Regional Housing Needs Statement produced by SANDAG and provided comments on the proposed preliminary goals and policy revisions for the 1999-2004 Housing Element update. The City held four (4) workshops to obtain the views of citizens, developers, social service agencies, and other interested persons on the City's housing needs and policies and programs to PAGE 6, ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: 12/19/00 be implemented to address these needs. The P~anning Commission and Housing Commission hosted one workshop each. These forums were held on October 20, October 27, November 1, and November 3, 1999. Consistent with the requirements of State law, the City made the Draft 1999-2004 Housing Element available to the public for review and comment for the required 30-day period, commencing November 6 to December 6, 1999. A notice was published in the Star News to inform the public of the availability of the Draft 1999-2004 Housing Element for review and comment and the time and location of the workshops. Copies of the document were made available at various City facilities located throughout the community. Various organizations and persons interested in the document were mailed individual notices of the public review and comment period and the availability of the document at the various City facilities. In addition, the document was distributed for review to persons and/or organizations requesting a copy. Following completion of the public review and comment period in December 1999, the City received comments and suggestions from residential developers and an advocacy group for affordable housing. Comments from residentiaJ developers centered on the City's Affordable Housing Program, greater discussion of governmental and non-governmental constraints to residential development, the quantified objectives for the five year period, and greater specificity and accountability of the proposed goals. Comments received from the advocacy group included greater details on the City's housing needs assessment, constraints to residential development, greater clarity of the number of housing opportunities provided over the last Housing Element cycle, the proper use of Redevelopment Low and Moderate Income Housing Set-aside funds for certain proposed goals, and the need to require more affordable units under the City's Affordable Housing Program and to provide greater details of the specifics of implementing such program. In an effort to work cooperatively with the residential development community, staff has been working continually since December 1999 with the Building Industry Association (BIA), developers/builders of the eastern master planned communities, and affordable housing providers to gain a better understanding of the opportunities and constraints to the development, financing and processing of residential projects and where appropriate addressing such issues within the Draft Element. Staff has made reasonable efforts to address the concerns of the BIA and developers of our master planned communities. However, there remain outstanding issues mainly focused on addressing the impact of fees, assessments and exactions on the provision of housing and the specifics for implementation of the City's Affordable Housing Program such as alternatives methods for compliance. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a summary of the verbal comments made by the Otey Ranch Company during the public hearing before the Planning Commission on November 15, 2000, a letter from the BIA received into the public record for such hearing, and a Summary of the Comments and the City's Response. Staff's desire to address these comments and to work cooperatively with developers, advocates and other interested persons has served to further delay the schedule for adoption of the Element. At this point in time, staff believes that such specific issues are better dealt with as the City begins PAGE 7, ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: 12/19/00 to implement the work programs outlined within the Element rather than addressing these concerns within a general planning document such as the Housing Element. A public notice was published on November 3 and December 8, 2000 in the Star News to inform the public of the availability of the Draft 1999-2004 Housing Element for review and the time and location of public hearings before the Planning Commission, Housing Advisory Commission and the City Counci~ to consider the Draft Element. Copies of the document were made available at the Planning Department and Community Development Department. Individual notices were also mailed to interested persons. Self-Certification State Housing Element law requires that all cities and counties submit the Housing Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development for a determination of substantial compliance with State law. However, State legislation (AB 1715) sponsored by SANDAG created the opportunity for jurisdictions within the San Diego region to self-certify their Housing Element's consistency with State law. Jurisdictions seeking self-certification must prepare an updated Housing Element with the same content and analysis as is required of those who must seek certification through the State Department of Housing and Community Development. In order to self-certify, a jurisdiction must meet the following criteria: 1) Meets its fair share of housing needs contained in the SANDAG Regional Housing Needs Statement during the current Housing Element cycle (1991-1999); 2) The Housing Element substantially complies with the provisions of Article 10.6 of Division 1, Title 7 of the Government Code (Housing Element Law); 3) The Housing Element addresses the dispersion of lower-income housing within its jurisdiction, documenting that additional housing opportunities will be developed in areas where concentrations of lower income households do not exist, taking into account the availability of necessary public facilities and infrastructure; and, 4) No local government actions or policies prevent the development of identified sites pursuant to Section 65583 of the Government Code, or accommodation of the City of Chula Vista's share of total regional housing need, pursuant to Section 65584. In accordance with the SANDAG Regional Housing Needs Statement for the current housing element cycle, the City of Chula Vista's fair share of the San Diego County region's housing needs was 1,058 housing units/opportunities. Through a variety of rental assistance, homebuyer assistance, new construction, and residential rehabilitation programs, Chub Vista far exceeded its regional share by providing affordable housing opportunities for 1,796 households between 1991 and 1999. As prepared, the updated Housing Element substantially complies with the requirements of State Law as summarized in Table 1 of the Element. Proposed Policy 3.1.1 (Balanced Communities) addresses the dispersion of Iow income housing within the jurisdiction and the City does not have policies that would prevent the development of available residential PAGE 8, ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: 12/19/00 land or the accommodation of the City's share of the regional housing need. Therefore, the City of Chub Vista is eligible to self-certi~ its' Housing Element for the 1999-2004 planning period. FISCAL IMPACT Staff time involved in the preparation of the Draft Housing Element agreement is budgeted in the staff services component of the Housing Division and Planning and Building Department budget. Implementation of the eighteen policies and programs outlined within the Element may require additional staff resources within the Community Development Department and Planning and Building Department. As each of the policies and programs are developed and implemented, staff will complete a more thorough analysis of staffing and resource needs and the fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution 2. Summary of Comments from The Otay Ranch Company, letter from the BIA, and Summary of Comments with the City Response 3. 1999-2004 Housing Element (on file in the Community Development Department) 4. Revised Negative Declaration IS-00-08 H:\HOME\COMMDEV~STAFF.REP\I 2-19-00\Rpt CC~Hsg Element.doc RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65585.1 FOR THE 1999-2004 HOUSING ELEMENT CYCLE AND ADOPTING A REVISED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS-00-08) WHEREAS, the State of California requires that all cities and counties prepare a housing element of their General Plan every five years (or as prescribed by State law) and submit it to the State Department of Housing and Community Development for determination of substantial compliance with the requirements of State Housing Element law; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the Project requires the preparation of a Negative Declaration and a Revised Negative Declaration (IS-00-08) was prepared; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said Housing Element and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely Decernber 19, 2000 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue before the City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the 1999-2004 Housing Element of the General Plan contains all relevant and necessary inforrnation as set forth in Article 10.6 of Division 1. Title 7 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) sponsored State Legislation (AS 1715) that was enacted as Government Code Section 65585.1 in 1995, which creates the opportunity for local governments within the San Diego Region to self-certify their Housing Element of their General Plan through a pilot program; and, WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista desires to self-certify its 1999-2004 Housing Element of the General Plan under the provisions of Government Code Section 65585.1; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing held on December 19, 2000, the City of Chula Vista finds based on substantial evidence that the attached document has met the criteria set forth in Section 65585.1 (c) for self-certification: (c)(1) The City of Chula Vista's adopted Housing Element or Amendment substantially complies with the provisions of Article 10.6 of Division 1, Title 7 of the Government Code, including addressing the /5-9 Resolution No. Page 2 of 2 needs of all income levels as summarized in Table 1 of the 1999-2004 Housing Element. (c)(2) For the third (1999-20004) Housing Element revision, the City of Chula Vista met its fair share of regional housing needs for the second housing element revision cycle, as determined by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) as attached as Exhibit A. (c)(3) The City of Chula Vista provides a statement, Policy 3.1.1 of the 1999-2004 Housing Element, regarding how its adopted Housing Element or Amendment addresses the dispersion of lower income housing within its jurisdiction, documenting that additional affordable housing opportunities will not be developed only in areas where concentrations of lower income households already exist, taking into account the availability of necessary public facilities and infrastructure. (c)(4) No local government actions or policies prevent the development of the identified sites pursuant to Section 65583, or accommodation of the City of Chula Vista's share of the total regional housing need, pursuant to Section 65584. NOW, THEEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that the attached document, entitled "City of Chula Vista Housing Element 1999-2004" is hereby approved as an element of the General Plan to act as a guide to the City in addressing the housing needs of all economic segments of the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Chula Vista hereby self- certifies its 1999-2004 Housing Element and submits this self-certification of compliance and the Housing Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Chula Vista hereby adopts Revised Negative Declaration IS-00-08. Presented by: Approved as to form by: ~~1h/ /IzJ/ City Attorney Chris Salomone Community Development Director /s-/o EXHIBIT 1 RESOLUTION NO. CDH 00-001 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65585.1 FOR THE 1999-2004 HOUSING ELEMENT CYCLE AND ADOPT REVISED NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-00-08 WHEREAS, the State of California requires that all cities and counties prepare a housing elernent of their General Plan every five years (or as prescribed by State law) and submit it to the State Department of Housing and Community Development for determination of substantial compliance with the requirements of State Housing Element law; and WHEREAS, the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) sponsored State Legislation (AB 1715) that was enacted as Government Code Section 65585.1 in 1995, which creates the opportunity for local governments within the San Diego Region to self-certify their Housing Element of their General Plan through a pilot program; and, WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista desires to self-certify its 1999-2004 Housing Element of the General Plan under the provisions of Government Code Section 65585.1 ; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the Project requires the preparation of a Negative Declaration and a Revised Negative Declaration (IS-00-08) was prepared; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Building Director set the time and place for a hearing on said Housing Element and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely November 15, 2000 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing held on November 15, 2000, the Planning Commission considered all reports, evidence, and testimony presented finds based on substantial evidence that the attached document has met the criteria set forth in Section 65585.1 (c) for self-certification: /1- I OR\G\NAL -ji-- f s:- Resolution No. CDH 00-001 Page 2 of 3 (c)(1) The City of Chula Vista's adopted Housing Element or Amendment substantially complies with the provisions of Article 10.6 of Division 1, Title 7 of the Government Code, including addressing the needs of all income levels as summarized in Table 1 of the 1999-2004 Housing Element. (c)(2) For the third (1999-20004) Housing Element revision, the City of Chula Vista met its fair share of regional housing needs for the second housing element revision cycle, as determined by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) as attached as Exhibit A. (c)(4) The City of Chula Vista provides a statement, Policy 3.1.1 of the 1999-2004 Housing Element, regarding how its adopted Housing Element or Amendment addresses the dispersion of lower income housing within its jurisdiction, documenting that additional affordable housing opportunities will not be developed only in areas where concentrations of lower income households already exist, taking into account the availability of necessary public facilities and infrastructure. (c)(5) No local government actions or policies prevent the development of the identified sites pursuant to Section 65583, or accommodation of the City of Chula Vista's share of the total regional housing need, pursuant to Section 65584. NOW, THEEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the attached document, entitled "City of Chula Vista Housing Element 1999-2004" as an element of the General Plan to act as a guide to the City in addressing the housing needs of all economic segments of the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that from the facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission recommends that the City Council self-certify its 1999-2004 Housing Element and submit this self-certification of compliance and the Housing Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt Revised Negative Declaration IS-00-08. A-~ Resolution No. CDH 00-001 Page 3 of 3 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 15'h day of November, 2000 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Chair Thomas, Commissioners Castaneda, Cortes, Willett, McCann, O'Neill NOES: ABSENT: Hall ABSTAIN: Robert Thomas, Chair ATTEST: Diana Vargas, Secretary [(LHl H:\SHARED\PLANNING\Hsg Element\Reso PC-Self Cert (December 13. 2000 (4:52PM)] /1-.3 EXHIBIT A Chula Vista Fair Share (1991-1999) Oeseri tion Fair Share Housin 0 ortunilies Provided Difference II-cf Total 1,058 1,796 738 EXHIBIT 2 THE OTAY RANCH COMPANY Draft Chula Vista Housing Element Comments 11/15/00 Comments Regarding Governmental Constraints Section Recommendations: Fees, Assessments and Exactions 1. More accurately depict fees, assessments and exactions. (See attached listing.) 2. Include in the Housing Element a policy that states the following fees shall not be assessed against low and very low income housing projects: Park Fee PDIF Residential Tax Reserve Fund Total $2,990 2,150 500 124 $5,764 Regional Land Supply 3. Include in the Housing Element text that recognizes that one of the foremost governmental constraints to the provision of affordable housing is the fact that, according to SANDAG, the region has an inadequate supply of residentially zoned land over the next 20 years, amounting to approximately 100,000 units. Additionally, much of the region's land that is zoned for residential development is generally remote and at densities that preclude the effective provision of affordable housing. Inclusionary Housing 4. Include in the Housing Element a statement that the Housing Element's Affordable Housing Program is a constraint to the provision of affordable housing (consistent with prior SANDAG acknowledgement). State and Federal ESA; Clean Water Act 5. Include in the Housing Element a more definitive statement that the state and federal Endangered Species Acts and the federal Clean Water Act are serious governmental constraints to the provision of affordable housing. . State Funded Infrastructure 6. Include in the Housing Element a more definitive statement that the withdrawal of the State of California from its historic role of funding, or providing local ,A-E Otay Ranch Company Comments Housing Element - Planning Commission Hearing 11/15/00 mechanisms to fund, highways and K-12 education facilities is a constraint to the provision of affordable housing. Tort Liability Reform 7. Include in the Housing Element a statement that California's strict liability law, as it applies to new home construction, is an impediment to the provision of affordable housing because it has removed from the market place a significant market segment, condominium homes. Specific Comments Recommendations: Page 75, Paragraph 1), 8th line: Change "meet state housing requirement" to "comply with the California Government Code as it relates to the planning for and provision of affordable housing". Page 76, 1st paragraph, 4th line: Change "provides a value of not less than the net cost of providing the affordable units on site" to "provides equivalent housing units". If- fa Typical Fees, Assessments and Exactions for a Single Family Detached Home in Otay Ranch SPA One Fee Amonnt Water WateT Connection Domestic Ins Water Meter %" W atef Capacity Fee SD County Water Authority Fee Otay Water District Annexation Fee $ 60 $ 58 $2,905 $1,876 $1.045 Sub Total Water $5,944 Sewer Sewer Capacity Fee Sewer Admin Fee Telegraph Canyon Basin $2,200 $ 30 $ 217 Sub Total Sewer $2,447 Other Facility Fees Transportation DIF SR-125 DlF Pedestrian Bridge Reserve Fund Public Facilities DlF Residential Construction Tax Traffic Signal Park Fee Drainage Fee Sub Other Facility Fees $5,785 $ 820 $ 545 $ 124 $2,150 $ 508 $ 130 $4,375 $4.579 $19,016 Miscellaneous Fees Bond Premiums Inspection Fees Preserve Conveyance (est.) Sub Total Misc. Fees $ 125 $ 500 $1.000 $1,625 BuUdinl!: Permit Fee Building Permit Plumbing Permit Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit Plan Check Fees Utility Fees (SDG&E) Sub Total Building Permit Fees $1,186 $ 143 $ 41 $ 106 $ 668 $1.500 $3,644 Soccial Financin~ Districts (Present Value) Sub Total Special Financing Districts $6,920 $ 445 $5,686 $4,618 $3,101 $8.400 $29,170 Open Space Maintenance District-CFD 97-1 Preserve Maintenance District 97-2 Sweetwater Union H.S. District-CFD 6 Chula Vista School District-CFD 8 City ofChula Vista AD 97-1 Homeowner Association Dues GRAND TOTAL $61,846 C:\My Documents\KimlFees.doc /1-7 . ,-_- '. J~' y'. j';", 6336 G~eenwich Drive, 5uMe A San Diego. CA Q2122-S922 (S58) 450-1221 FAX No. (858) 552-14<5 PRESIDENT Colin Said ColRich Communities, Inc:. VICE PRESIDENT Slave Doyle Brookfield Homes TREASURER/SECRETARY MIKE NEAL H.G. Fenton Company IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT Mlck Pattinson Barratt American EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDEN, Paul A. Tryon Call1omja Building Ind~slry Association Nali.::~al Associatio:-, oj Horn!'! Buiiders =UJ__ij;~;..: ih_:~:::j;:_~' ;-.::..;:__ !t~~':: : BUILDING INDUSTR Y ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY - November ]5,2000 Chairman Robert Thomas City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 9] 9] 0 Re: Chula Vista Housing Element Dear Chairman Thomas. The Building Industry Association (BrA) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the city of Chula Vista's proposed Housing Element (Element). As outlined in your staff report we were first offered the opportunity to review and comment on a draft of the Element late last year. The BrA and its members offered extensive verbal and v,Titten comments from an industry perspective. The BrA would like to thank your staff for responding positively to most of these comments. There continues to be some concerns hov-,rever. Affordable Housing Program This program adds significant cost to market rate units. In a studv commissioned by the BIA in Carls bad it was found that the methodology used to exact land and financing for affordable housing added approximately $10,000 to a market rate unit. The City should acknowledge that their program transfers what should be a community wide responsibility to a small number of future residents. (P,35) Fees and Exactions The City should state specific and affirmative steps it intends to take to waive certain building, planning, and engineering fees, as well as development impact fees such as traffic, public facility, and park fees. The current practice of the City in pledging money to offset costs from "restricted" fund sources (HOME, redevelopment set asides) and then used by the developer to pay for building permit, plan check, and fees that then are transferred into the "unrestricted" General Fund, does not provide any meaningful reductions in costs. (P. 34) Processing Rnd Permit Procedures Chula Vista should acknowledge that time delays created by its regulatory process adds significantly to the cost of each home. The discussion of the A-i :;L_',:'.1:':' :>: ! :',:.'; ::;,U j :...!...i; ]\!b i hDUST~. .:....;:.~:~!(. .:...-;) :t: ~'2:' -- ~ ,. . . . _/ City's "fast-track" processing fails to analyze any actual reduction in costs but mm:ly makes a conclusion that fast tracking can reduce cost. The same can be said for the "parallel processing" of projects. Does either of these programs actually reduce cost and time? Has the department tracked and verified the result of this program with its development community? The'reqUirement for up front phasing has been found in other jurisdictions to create a time delay that would nonnally not exist in the development process thus adding to the overall cost of a development that is then passed on to all market rate units within that development. (P. 35) MSCP While we appreciate the addition of language discussing environmental concerns we would caution the City that assumptions about cost and times savings are speculative at this time. Failure of the City to add coverage for the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly could result in duplicative processing of plans. Further, Critical Habitat designations may seriously diminish certainty or timesavings. (P.36) Land and Construction Costs The cost of infrastructure financed through Mello-Roos district seems to be missing III the constraints discussion of Land and Construction Costs (p.37) Goal 3.1 AfIordable Housing Program The BIll. believes that the lack of certainty and the great discretion given to Housing Department staff to determine the method of meeting the Affordable Hosing Goals in essence creates and "ad hoc" program that would require a higher level scrutiny (Erlich). When a City chooses to exact land and require fees on an essentially ad hoc basis it makes the review of its program subject to higher constitutional standards of review. Failure on the part of the City to adequately layout goals that are uniformly applicable and that limit individualized determinations of compliance on the part of the staff are significant indicators of the ad hoc nature of this program. 3.1.1 Balanced COITlll1unities - this goal, while admirable in its intent, assures that any opportunity that would result from a much more cost-effective program of acquisition and rehabilitation of existing at risk units will not be considered. This goal should be balanced against the need to provide as many low-income properties as possible with the available financing. 3.1.2 Affordable Housing Requirement - Please provide any documentation you have including a nexus study linking the need for low income housing as the result of building market rate housing. 3.1.2 D) 1,2 &3 Alternatives to Construction of Affordable Housing Units - This section is too vague. Staff should be directed to develop guidelines that identify the specific standards to implement and determine "...a value no less than the cost of providing the affordable units on site" Without clear standards, projects could be needlessly delayed, given the City's requirement for up front phasing of a developer's affordable housing obligation. A set of standards identifying economic infeasibility should be prepared and reviewed by the Council as a part of tills program to ensure a fair outcome in these circumstances. A nexus study would be required for the in-lieu fee. We again request any study the City has to establish the legality of its affordable housing program. 11- , ,1_- ~ ,- -." ':): ; C';-;',', SU l:"D i !I;G : )C'US:~':! ,:.22=':':' r ' r-.~"", ::.:.::.: : 3.3.1 Density Bonus - The City should set clearer timelines fDr the enactment Df a Density Bonus Ordinance. Vague fiscal year dates offer tDO much opportunity tD Jet this impDrtant program fall through the cracks. It does nDt appear it will meet the December 2000 goal. 3.3.2 Development Standards - This language is too vague. When will City staff begin reviewing the City's development standards? When can we expect the results of this review? The review of develDpment standards should be broadened to include all standards that make the provision of attainable market rate and affordable housing less likely. 3.4.3 Second Dwelling Units - The City should set clearer timelines for the enactment of a Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance. It does not appear it will meet the December 2000 gDal. (P.73-78) Summary' of Meeting with Affordable HOUsing Developers I am cDncerned with the last minute changes to this report that did not accompany the September 2000 draft. Language supporting the bias of staff fDr new construction as a priority was not included in the September draft although aU meetings with affordable housing developers appear tD have been completed in a time frame that wDuld have allowed complete and timely meeting notes. Further discussions with some of the developers present indicate that while they are aware that the new construction program would benefit some they did not express a desire to see this as a priority. This does reflect, contrary to staffs statement in the meeting notes, a bias on the part of staff for this program. Further, while acquisition and rehabilitation of older units may not add to the existing housing stDck it can and \vill provide a more diverse supply of affordable housing units. Acquisition and RehabilitatiDn permanently replaces a market-rate substandard, poorly managed unit with a brand new renovated and well-managed low-income unit. (P.95-100) We look forward to working with your staff as we all seek to provide the most affordable housing product pDssible 'within the city of Chula Vista. Sincerely, r Jerry Livingston Staff Counsel Building Industry Association ;1- 10 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA 1999"2004 Summary of Comments Received During Public Hearing and City Response atay Ranch Company 350 W Ash Street Suite 730 San Diego CA 92101 Contact Person: Kim Kilkenny (619) 234-4050 1. Comment: Fees, Assessments and Exaction More accurately depict fees, assessments and exactions associated with typical residential developments in Chula Vista. Use as an example those fees, assessments and exactions paid for Otay Ranch Company. Recommend that the following fees should not be assessed against low-income affordable housing project: Park Fee PDIF Residential Tax Reserve Fund TOTAL 2,990 2,150 500 124 $5,764 Response: Fees, assessments, and exactions provided by the Otay Ranch Company are specific to this particular development and may not be reflective of other residential developments. Staff has some concern that some of fees that are included are not true fees, assessments, and exactions paid by the developer, such as the Homeowner Association fees. The City used the Building Industry Association's 1999 Development Impact Fee Survey as a basis for prototypical fees paid by residential developments. The City does not have the ability to waive fees and charges. Such fees and charges represent actual costs to provide services and facilities. Any policy to waive or reduce development fees must be approved by the City Council. Policy 8.1.1 of the Draft Housing Element does specify that the City will continue to review such fees to assure they are as cost effective as possible and will continue to consider subsidizing or deferring fees for affordable units on a case-by-case basis. 2. Comment: Reaional Land Supplv In accordance with SANDAG, the region has an inadequate supply of residentially zoned land to accommodate the anticipated growth. Land that is zoned for residential use is generally remote and at low densities that do not allow for the provision of affordable housing. ;'1- /1 Housing Element Comments Page 2 Response: The Draft Element will be revised to state the need for residential zoned land at the appropriate densities to accommodate the anticipated growth. However, the City of Chula Vista is one of the jurisdictions within the County of San Diego that has residential land available at the appropriate densities. 3. Comment: Affordable Housinq Proqram (lnclusionarv Housinq) Include a statement that the Housing Element's Affordable Housing Program is a constraint to the provision of affordable housing. Response: The Draft Element currently lists the City's Affordable Housing Program as a governmental constraint to housing (see Page 35). Additional language will be added to clarify how such policies are a constraint to housing. 4. Comment: State and Federal ESA: Clean Water Act Include a more definitive statement that State and Federal Endangered Species Acts and the federal Clean Water Act are serious governmental constraints to the provision of housing. Response: While the Draft Element currently includes a discussion of the constraints of State and Federal environmental protection regulations on the provision of housing, the City will include more definitive language that such regulations are serious constraints. 5. Comment: State Funded Infrastructure Include a more definitive statement that the withdrawal of State funding and providing local mechanisms to fund highways and schools is a constraint. Response: The Draft Element will be revised to include more definitive language that the loss of income generated from increasing property taxes as a result of Proposition 13 and limited mechanisms for the funding of infrastructure has resulted in the passing through of such costs to the associated residential developments and subsequently passed on to homeowners. 6. Comment: Tort Liability Reform Include a discussion of the State's product liability laws that have affected the construction of condominium developments which are a significant housing product type providing more affordable housing opportunities than single family detached homes. A-/~ Housing Element Comments Page 3 Response: The Draft Element will be revised to include a discussion of the State's product liability laws that has resulted in a decrease in the number of newly constructed condominium developments due to construction defect litigation. However, some developers have found methods to limit their exposure to such product liability laws and continue to construct condominium developments. 7. Comment: Page 75, Paragraph 1, lih line: Change "meet State housing requirement" to "comply with the California Government Code as it relates to the planning for and provision of affordable housing" Response: The Draft Element will be revised. 8. Comment: Page 76, Paragraph 1, 4th line: Change "provides a value of not less than the net cost of providing the affordable units on site" to "provide equivalent housing units. Response: The requirement to provide ten percent (10%) of the total residential development as affordable housing for low and moderate income households under the City's Balanced Communities Affordable Housing Program is a minimum and does not preclude a developer from providing more than the 10%. As is the case of other alternative methods of compliance, such as contribution of land or monies, the value of such is based upon the need to provide comparable and like value not necessarily equivalency of units. ,/I" /:3 Housing Element Comments Page 4 Building Industry Association 6336 Greenwich Drive Suite A San Diego CA 92122 Contact Person: Jerry Livingston (858) 450-1221 1. Comment: Affordable Housinq Proqram (Inclusionary Housinq) Acknowledge that the City's Affordable Housing Program adds to the cost of housing and such costs are ultimately transferred to the homeowner/buyer. The City's Affordable Housing Program transfers what is a community wide responsibility for affordable housing to a small number of future residents. Response: The Draft Element currently lists the City's Affordable Housing Program as a governmental constraint to housing (see Page 35). Additional language will be added to clarify how such policies are a constraint to housing. The City acknowledges that the provision of affordable housing is a community wide responsibility. The City of Chula Vista is committed to using all of the resources available to create varied housing opportunities throughout the City. Of the 1,796 affordable housing opportunities created this past planning period, only 53 were created through the Affordable Housing "inclusionary" program. Of the remaining 1 ,743 affordable housing opportunities were created through the use of other resources and programs, such as preservation of at- risk housing, rental assistance, rehabilitation, and such opportunities were primarily provided in western Chula Vista. The City has worked with for-profit and non-profit developers of affordable housing to construct and acquire and rehabilitate housing throughout the City. The Affordable Housing Program is not the sole source for the provision of such housing within the City. Additionally, the City has financially contributed as well as provided other incentives, to developers of affordable housing. 2. Comment: Fees, Assessments and Exaction The City should state specific and affirmative steps it intends to take to waiver certain fees. The City's current practice of subsidizing fees does not provide meaningful reductions in costs. Response: Development fees and charges represent actual costs to provide services and facilities. While the City may waive or reduce fees, the costs of providing such services and facilities would need to be paid by some funding source. Any policy to waive or reduce development fees must be approved by the City Council. Policy 8.1.1 of the Draft Housing Element does specify that the City will continue to review such fees to assure they are as cost effective as possible and will continue to consider subsidizing or deferring fees for affordable units on a case-by-case basis. II./tf Housing Element Comments Page 5 3. Comment: Processinq and Permittinq Procedures The City of Chula Vista should acknowledge that time delays created by its regulatory process adds significantly to the cost of each home. The Draft Element makes a conclusion fast tracking can reduce cost without providing any analysis or verifiable results that fast tracking or parallel processing does result in actual reductions in costs. Response: The Draft Element does state that substantial delays in processing can equate to higher costs and therefore, affects the true cost of housing. While the City has not completed a thorough analysis with verifiable results of the savings of time and monies associated with "fast tracking" or "parallel processing", it is generally acknowledged that the "fast tracking" or "parallel processing" of projects versus a more typical review process does equate to a savings in time and therefore reduction in costs. The Draft Element will be revised to more specifically state that time delays in the review process adds to the costs of housing. Additionally, the Draft Element will be revised to reflect the comments of affordable housing developers regarding the need for fast tracking of affordable housing developments and the effects of time delays for the financing of such projects. 4. Comment: MSCP The BIA appreciates the addition of language to address environmental constraints to housing production but cautions the City that assumptions about cost and times savings are speculative at this time. Additional critical habitat designations and failure to add coverage for the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly could seriously diminish certainty and cost or times savings. Response: No response required. 5. Comment: Land and Construction Costs - Infrastructure The cost of infrastructure financed through Mello-Roos districts seems to be missing in the constraints discussion of Land and Construction Costs. Response: The Draft Element will be revised to include more definitive language that the withdrawal of State funding and limited mechanisms for the funding of infrastructure has resulted in the passing through of such costs to the associated residential developments and subsequently passed on to homeowners. 11- IS' Housing Element Comments Page 6 6. Comment: Policv 3. 1.2 Affordable Housina Proaram The BIA believes the policy gives great discretion to the Housing Department staff to determine a method of meeting the Affordable Housing Program requirements and therefore, creates an ad hoc program that would require a higher level of scrutiny. The ad hoc nature of the program makes the review of the program subject to higher constitutional standards of review. Response: As stated, compliance with the Affordable Housing Program must be met through the new construction of units within the project and only under unique conditions would the City entertain alternative methods of compliance. Through the adoption of Implementation Guidelines for the Program, staff will be addressing any alternative methods of compliance. 7. Comment: Policv 3. 1. 1 Balanced Communities This goal, while admirable in its intent, assures that any opportunity that would result from a much more cost-effective program of acquisition and rehabilitation of existing at-risk units will not be considered. This goal should be balanced against the need to provide as many low-income housing developments as possible with the available financing. Response: The City's policy is that affordable housing opportunities should be integrated through out the community rather than concentrating such housing within one area of the City. This policy is reinforced by State law (Section 65585.1 of the Government Code) which specifies that cities that self-certify their Housing Element must "address the dispersion of lower- income housing within its jurisdiction, documenting that additional affordable housing opportunities will be developed in areas where concentrations of lower-income households do not exist, taking into account the availability of necessary pubic facilities and infrastructure" . While acquisition and rehabilitation of residential units is needed for revitalization and would lead to an increase in restricted affordable housing, it does not create new housing and will not meet the increasing demand for housing as the population grows. In effect a market unit which mayor may not be already at an affordable rent level is taken away from the market and then restricted as affordable to lower income households. Rehabilitation activities do not meet the City's goals under the State requirement to provide its share of the projected need for new housing in the region (Regional Need). The City of Chula Vista is expected to provide a total of 10,401 new housing units, of which 3,424 units are to be affordable to very low and low income households, for the 1999-2004 planning period. The City has other programs, outside of the AHP, to address the community's need for preservation and maintenance of the existing housing stock. Goals 1 and 2 and the associated 15 policies and programs specifically address the City's commitment to also providing policies and programs that will conserve existing affordable housing opportunities and maintain and enhancing the quality of residential neighborhoods throughout the City. A-I' Housing Element Comments Page 7 8. Comment: Policv 3. 1.2 Affordable Housina Reauirement Please provide any documentation you have, including a nexus study, linking the need for low income housing as a result of building market rate housing. Response: The City's Balanced Communities Affordable Housing Program is part of a general legislative document and is within the powers of a City to protect and facilitate the health, safety, and welfare of its community and residents. 9. Comment: Goal 3. 1.2 D) Alternatives to Construction of Affordable Housina Reauirement The discussion of alternative methods of compliance with the Affordable Housing Requirement is too vague. Staff should be directed to develop guidelines which identify the specific standards to implement and determine "... a value of no less than the cost of providing affordable units on site". Without such clear standards, projects could be needlessly delayed. Standards to identify economic infeasibility should be prepared and reviewed by the Council as part of this program. A nexus study would be required for the in- lieu fee. Response: The Draft Housing Element is a general planning and strategy document. It is inappropriate to detail specifics for implementation of programs that may need to be continually revised and updated within such a document. As indicated in the current Housing Element and has been carried forward to the updated 1999-2004 Element, staff will complete Implementation Guidelines for the Balanced Communities. Staff has in fact completed its first draft of these Guidelines, which have been provided to residential developers for their review and comment. While staff, understands the importance of finalizing this document, staff also desires to provide guidelines that work for the City and the residential development community. Therefore, staff would like to continue to work cooperatively with the development community to address any concerns and issues raised regarding the specifics of implementation of the Program within the Guidelines itself and not the Element. Developers would be able to utilize alternative methods of compliance with the AHP only when Council has determined that the unique conditions or circumstances of a development would not allow the new construction of units within the development. The draft Element outlines several determinations or findings that would need to be made. "Economic infeasibility" is not a standard outlined but rather an "unreasonable hardship" is the determination to be made. The draft Implementation Guidelines will further address what factors could constitute an unreasonable hardship. At such time the City determines that an in-lieu fee is an appropriate and justified alternative method of compliance for a specific residential development, staff will then determine a method and a dollar value for the in-lieu fee. Such dollar value and the corresponding formula will be reviewed and adopted by City Council prior to its implementation and shall be used when similar circumstances arise. /1..11 Housing Element Comments Page 8 10. Comment: Goal 3.3.1 Densitv Bonus The City should set more specific timelines for the revision of the City's Ordinance to ensure follow through in a timely manner. Response: The Draft Housing Element states that the City's Density Bonus Ordinance would be completed by December 2000. This date will be revised to reflect March 2000. 11. Comment: Goal 3.3.2 Development Standards The language is too vague. No timeline is given. The City should review all standards that make the provision of housing less likely. Response: Policy 3.3.2 states that the City shall evaluate the possibility of waiving or modifying certain development standards on a case-by-case basis as requested by developers but does not anticipate a comprehensive review of all developments standards. 12. Comment: Goal 3.4.3 Second Dwellina Units The City should set clearer timelines for the revision of the City's Ordinance to ensure follow through in a timely manner. Response: The Draft Housing Element states that the revisions to the City's Density Bonus Ordinance would be completed by December 2000. This date will be revised to reflect March 2000. 13. Comment: Summary of Meetinas with Affordable Housina Developers There were last minute changes to the Summary that did not accompany the September 2000 draft. Language supporting staff's bias for new construction as a priority was not included in the September draft although all meetings with affordable housing developers appear to have been included in a time frame that would have allowed complete and timely meeting notes. Further discussions with some of the developers present indicate that while they are aware that the new construction programs would benefit some, they did not express a desire to see this as a priority. This does reflect, contrary to staffs statement in the meeting notes, a bias on the part of staff for this program. Response: On June 23, 2000 and July 14, 2000, City staff meet with affordable housing developers, as listed in the Summary of Meetings with Affordable Housing Developers. The Summary represents generalized comments received by developers at both meetings and such comments may not reflect the comments or opinions of each developer or the City. /I -Ii Housing Element Comments Page 9 As indicated in the discussion of the Affordable Housing Program, developers did discuss the need to provide newly constructed units as first priority. While the acquisition and rehabilitation of residential units is needed for revitalization, it does not create new housing. These comments were made at the June 23'" meeting and were not merely included as a bias on staffs part. However, developers at the July 14th meeting did not address the issue of new construction versus rehab. Developers at both meetings did discuss the need to provide a balanced program of new construction and rehabilitation. Upon more careful review of the September draft of the Housing Element, you will find that this discussion of the first priority for the new construction was not just added in the November draft provided to the Housing Commission and Planning Commission but was indeed included within the September draft. Prior to finalizing the Summary, it was circulated in early August in draft format for review by all those in attendance at these meetings. This original draft did contain language regarding the priority for new construction as was discussed at the June 23'" meeting of affordable housing developers. One developer did provide comments that he did not recall this issue being discussed. However, this developer was not present at the June 23'" meeting where several developers did state the need for new construction versus rehabilitation. 14. Comment: Acquisition and Rehabilitation of Older Units While acquisition and rehabilitation of older units may not add to the existing housing stock, it provides a more diverse supply of affordable housing units. Acquisition and rehabilitation permanently replaces a market rate substandard, poorly managed unit with a brand new renovated and well managed low income unit. Response: Please see Response given to BIA Comment No. 7 above. /1- " EXHIBIT 3 ~v?- :~-=~ ""'-~~~ (flY OF CHULA VISTA DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN 1999-2004 December 2000 RedlinelStrikeout Version A-2..0 CITY OF CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT 1999-2004 City Council Members Shirley Horton, Mayor Patty Davis Jerry Rindon~' Steve Padillii!jl Mary Salas" John McCaan John McCaan Adopted on December _' 2000 City Council Resolution No. .s:~-,' HOUSING ELEMENT STAFF Administration Robert A. Leiter, Director of Plapning and Building Chris Salomone, Director of Co~unity Development Gail Mil-~Leod, MacLeod Consulting Services, LLC ./1.. :l" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Housing Element for the City of Chula Vista is an element of the City's General Plan. It covers the period beginning July I, 1999 to June 30, 2004. Background Information Chula Vista is the second largest municipality in San Diego County with a population of 166,945 residents. The City covers approximately 50 square miles along the San Diego Bay and surrounded by National City, the City of San Diego, and the unincorporated area. Two major north-south freeways, 1-5 and 1-805 traverse Chula Vista. The area west of the 1-805, "western Chula Vista" is built-up and characterized by well-established neighborhoods with primarily infill and redevelopment residential construction activity. The developing "eastern area" is comprised of large vacant tracts constituent to several master planned communities in various stages of approval and implementation. Needs Assessment According to SANDAG's Preliminary 2020 Cities/County Forecast, Chula Vista is expected to gain 46,000 new residents and 13,801 new households. The characteristics of the City's population, housing, and employment that affect its housing goals, policies, and programs include: Population/Household Characteristics . Chula Vista residents have household income and age characteristics that nearly match the regional median. . The population has more diversity in race/ethnicity than the region, in that 44 percent of the population is white (non-Hispanic) and 42 percent is Hispanic (all races), this compares to 61 percent and 23 percent respectively. . Household size is slightly larger than the region, at 3.0 persons per household for Chula Vista, compared to 2.83 persons per household for the region. Land Use Characteristics . A large supply of vacant developable land is planned for communities with a wide variety of densities and land use types. . The well-established neighborhoods and master planned neighborhoods create different opportunities and require a different set of policies and programs to address housing needs. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A.;L! Page 1 of 103 Septemller 2QQQ Employment Characteristics · The City's diverse employment base will grow by more than 47 percent between 1995 and 2005, with the majority of growth in the retail, service, and government sectors. Housing Stock Characteristics · A high rate of new home construction is anticipated due to the many approved master planned communities in the City. · Reinvestment in the well-established neighborhoods of Western Chula Vista continues to be needed. · Approximately 13,000 units will be 50 years or older by 2004. · A home ownership rate of 53 percent is nearly the same as the region's rate of 54 percent. · The very low rental vacancy rate of 1.1 percent indicates likely increased housing costs and greater likelihood of over-crowding. · The median housing cost (resale) of $177,000 is $18,500 less than the region's median cost of $195,500. · Average rents are 10 percent to 30 percent lower than the region wide average rents. Assisted Housing Units at Risk of Converting to Market Rate Units · Two projects have at-risk units that were created through the density bonus program. These 41 units could be converted to market rate units in 2000 and 2008. Goals and Policies The primary goal of the City is to ensure that decent, safe housing is available at an affordable cost. The priority is the provision of housing for families, particularly large families, of all income levels. Goal 1. Conserve Existing Affordable Housing Opportunities Goal 2. Maintain and Enhance the Quality of Residential Neighborhoods in Chula Vista Goal 3. Ensure That an Adequate and Diverse Housing Supply Is Available to Meet the City's Existing and Future Needs. Goal 4. Increase Home Ownership Opportunities for Low- and Moderate-income Households Page 2 of 103 September 2ggg ;/l. ,z.t/ HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 GoalS. Enable Homeless Individuals and Families to Find Permanent Housing Goal 6. Encourage Energy and Waste Conservation as an Integral Part of Homes Goal 7. Promote Equal Opportunity for All Residents to Reside in Housing of Their Choice Goal 8. Reduction And/or Removal to the Greatest Extent Possible of Identified Constraints to the Development, Maintenance, and Improvement of Housing Each of these goals has a set of policies and programs, which include objectives for the 1999- 2004 Housing Element cycle, as summarized in the table below and as more specifically set forth in Section V. 1999-2004 QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES Description Households. Assisted Preserve At-Risk 41 SF/MH Rehabilitation 250 Caring Neighbors 500 Rental Rehabilitation 120 Christmas in October 25 Affordable Housing Program - Low Income 460 Affordable Housing Program - Moderate Income 470 State Density Bonus 10 Mixed Use Developments 100 Shared Housing 350 First Time Home Buyer - Aff Hsg Program 130 Mortgage Credit Certificate 25 Transitional Housing 10 Fair Housing Assistance ISO Total 2,641 The City has two sets of numerical housing goals established by SANDAG, which are also addressed in the Housing Element; the City's share of the region's future housing needs (regional share goals) and the affordable housing goal for self-certification. The total regional share goal is 10,40 I new housing units and the estimated total affordable housing opportunities for self- certification in 2004 is 1,029. Both of these totals are divided into income categories which are explained in this Housing Element. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A.z.r Page 3 of 103 September 2000 The City ofChula Vista is eligible to self-certify this Housing Element update in 1999 because it created 1,796 affordable housing opportunities between 1991-1999. This means that when the City Council adopts the final Housing Element, including a resolution that makes the "self- certification findings," the Housing Element update process is completed. The Housing Element is not sent to the State Housing and Community Development Department for certification (approval). Page 4 of 103 September 2Qllll 'A..z.' HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 Introduction The Housing Element is an important planning tool for the City of Chula Vista. It identifies the housing needs of the City and recommends ways to meet these needs while balancing other community objectives and resources. City Profile Chula Vista is the second largest municipality in San Diego County with a population of 166,945 residents. The City covers approximately 50 square miles along the San Diego Bay and surrounded by National City, the City of San Diego, and the unincorporated area. Two major north-south freeways, 1-5 and 1-805 traverse Chula Vista. The area west of the 1-805, "western Chula Vista" is built-up and characterized by well-established neighborhoods with primarily infill and redevelopment residential construction activity. The developing "eastern area" is comprised of large vacant tracts constituent to several master planned communities in various stages of approval and implementation. Housing Element The Housing Element is an important planning tool for the City of Chula Vista. It identifies the housing needs of the City and recommends ways to meet these needs while balancing other community objectives and resources. As the needs and programs are discussed in this Housing Element, a distinction may be made between Western and Eastern Chula Vista. Exhibit 1 shows the areas covered by that reference. State Policy and Authorization The California State Legislature has identified the attainment of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian as the State's main housing goal. Recognizing the important part that local planning programs play in pursuit of this goal, the Legislature has mandated that all cities and counties prepare a housing element as part of their comprehensive general plans. State law requires housing elements to be updated at least every five years to reflect a community's changing housing needs. Chula Vista's Housing Element was last updated in 1991. No update of the Element was required until 1999 due to legislative extensions. This document is the 1999-2004 update required for jurisdictions within the San Diego region. Organization of the Housing Element Section 65302(c) of the Government Code sets forth the specific components to be contained in a community's housing element. Table 1 summarizes these State requirements and identifies the sections in the Chula Vista Housing Element where these requirements are addressed. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /'I-;z. 7 Page 5 of 103 Septemeer Zggg Relationship. to Other General Plan Elements The City ofChula Vista's General Plan consists often elements: I) Land Use; 2) Circulation; 3) Open Space and Conservation; 4) Noise; 5) Safety; 6) Public Facilities; 7) Housing; 8) Growth Management; 9) Parks and Recreation; and 10) Childcare, and contains goals and policies for urban development, community design, housing, natural hazards, economic development, and public services and facilities. The content of this Housing Element is consistent with the goals and policies of all elements of the General Plan. Public Participation Early in the Housing Element update process, one Housing Element information session was held with the City Council. At that time, they discussed the draft Regional Housing Needs and provided comments on the proposed preliminary goals and policy revisions for the 1999-2004 Housing Element update. Also, as part of housing program funding discussions, the Housing Advisory Commission discussed and gave input on housing programs and needs. The draft Housing Element was subject to four public-noticed workshops prior to final Planning Commission and City Council consideration of Housing Element adoption. The Planning Commission and Housing Advisory Commission hosted one workshop each, and there were two additional workshops scheduled for public convenience. Sources of Information The Regional Housing Needs Statement produced by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) in 1999 provided the majority of the background material for the preparation of the Housing Element. This document includes data from the 1990 Census and SANDAG's 1998 Population and Housing Estimates, among other sources. Page 6 of 103 Septemaer 200g HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A- .2. V EXHIBIT 1 ~ <( c Z :::::l o CO ~ en > <( ..J :::::l :::c (.J 11. o ~ (.J ~ - I- ~ Z .. ~~ ~ ~I~i! j u~ ~ ~ ii c.. :5 '" HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 Page 7 of 103 September 2990 /1-2..9 TABLE 1 STATE HOUSING ELEMENT REQUIREMENTS CALIFORNIA,1999 , c, Page " " 1. Housing Needs Assessment a. Analysis of population trends 9 b. Analysis of employment trends 21 c. Projection and quantification ofChula Vista's existing and projected 60 housing needs for all income groups d. Analysis and documentation ofChula Vista's housing characteristics 24 e. An inventory of land suitable for residential development including vacant sites and those having redevelopment potential and an analysis of the 58 relationship of zoning, public facilities, and services to these sites f. Analysis of existing and potential governmental constraints upon the 31 maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels g. Analysis of existing and potential non-governmental constraints upon the 37 maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels h. Analysis of special housing needs including those of handicapped, elderly, 14 large families, single-parent households, and farm workers i. Analysis of the needs of homeless individuals and families in Chula Vista 17 J. Analysis of opportunities for energy conservation with respect to residential 61 development 2. Goals and Policies a. Identification ofChula Vista's goals and policies relative to the 67 maintenance, improvement, and development of housing 3. Implementation Program a. Identify adequate sites which will be made available through appropriate action with required public services and facilities for a variety of housing 58 types for all income levels b. Programs to assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of low- and moderate-income households and other special needs 69 groups c. Identify, and, when appropriate and possible, remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing 31 in Chula Vista d. Conserve and improve the condition of the existing and affordable housing 69 stock in Chula Vista Page 8 of 103 September 2090 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A -.3..0 I. Needs Assessment This section of the Housing Element discusses housing needs in Chula Vista. The major components of this need are the City's population, household, special needs groups, land use, employment, and housing stock characteristics. This needs assessment serves as the basis for identifying the appropriate goals, policies and programs for the City to implement during the 1999-2004 housing element cycle. Population Characteristics Population Growth Since 1990 In 1990, the population of the San Diego region was 2,498,016. It is estimated that by 1998 the region's population had grown to 2,795,780, an increase of 11.9 percent. During this same time Chula Vista's population increased by approximately 19.9 percent. Refer to Table I-I, Population Growth Chula Vista and San Diego Region 1990-1998. TABLE 1-1 POPULATION GROWTH CHULA VISTA AND SAN DIEGO REGION 1990-1998 Year (Jan!) Chu!;tVista Slln Dieg() Regi()1l ChlllllNistaas %of the Region 1990 135,163 2,498,016 5.4% 1991 13 8,262 2,539,583 5.4% 1992 141,015 2,583,470 5.5% 1993 144,466 2,614,222 5.5% 1994 146,525 2,638,511 5.6% 1995 149,791 2,690,255 5.6% 1996 153,164 2,690,255 5.7% 1997 156,401 2,729,054 5.7% 1998 162,106 2,795,780 5.9% Total Increase 26,943 297,764 0/0 Increase 19.9% 11.9% Source: State Department of Fmance ReVIsed Annual January 1, 1997 estimates. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-.3' Page 9 of 103 September 20(;)0 Projected Population As indicated in Table 1-2, Chula Vista's population is expected to increase by 82.28 percent between 1995 and 2020, an increase of approximately 124,362 people. Compared with the 44 percent growth for the region. For the period approximating the housing element period (1998 to 2005), Chula Vista's population will increase by 28 percent, an increase of 46,000. This compares to a regional increase of 15 percent. TABLE 1-2 PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH Source: SANDAG Prehmmary 2020 CIties/County Forecast, February 1999, State OOF March 1998 I' Yeat ChlllaViSta Sanmego:Region 1995 151,093 2,669,200 1998 162,106 2,795,780 2005 208,107 3,223,4 74 2010 233,313 3,437,697 2020 275,455 3,853,297 Total Increase 124,362 1,184,097 % Increase 82.3% 44.4% Age Characteristics Housing demand within the market is often determined by the preferences of certain age groups. Traditionally, both the young adult population (20-34 years of age) and the elderly population tend to favor apartments, low- to moderate-cost condominiums, and smaller single-family units. Persons between 35 and 65 years often provide the major market for moderate- to high-cost apartments and condominiums and larger single-family units because they tend to have higher incomes and larger sized households. Chula Vista's largest population group consists of persons between the ages of 20 and 34 (22 percent of the population), compared to approximately 24 percent for the region. The median age in Chula Vista is 32.7 years; County median is 28.8. Refer to Table 1-3, Population by Age Group. Page 10 of 103 September 2ggg A - .9 :J.. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 TABLE 1-3 POPULATION BY AGE GROUP Chula Vista Region Age Population Percellt p()plll#ion Percent Under 5 14,789 9% 234,317 8.4% 5-19 34,085 22% 588,971 21% 20-34 34,843 22% 658,568 23.6% 35-44 24,228 16% 460,224 16.5% 45-54 17,591 11% 328,180 12% 55-64 12,097 8% 204,891 7% 65 and older 18,515 12% 319,634 11.5% Total 156,148 100% 2,794,785 100% Source: SANDAG Demographic Charactenstlcs Estimates, March 1998 RacelEthnicity Characteristics Ethnicity tends to correlate with other characteristics such as family size. Table 1-4 shows that in Chula Vista, the population is diverse, with no single race/ethnic group predominating. TABLE 1-4 CHANGE IN POPULATION BY RACE 1990 - 1997 Population 1990 1997 PercentChange White (non-Hispanic) 49.8% 44.0% -5.8% Black (non-Hispanic) 4.2% 4.6% 0.4% Hispanic (all races) 37.3% 42.0% 4.7% Asian/Other (non-Hispanic) 8.5% 9.5% 1.0% Total Population 135,163 162,047 20% HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 11- 33 Page 11 of 103 September 2000 Household Characteristics In 1998, an estimated 951,818 households (also known as occupied housing units) were in the region, an increase of seven percent since 1990. In Chula Vista, there were an estimated 53,968 households, 5.7 percent of the region's total. Projected Households Between 1998 and 2005, the number of households in the San Diego region is forecasted to grow by 136,884 households, a gain of approximately 14 percent. By 2005, the number of households in Chula Vista is expected to be 67,769 households, an increase of 13,801 new households or 25.6 percent. The City will account for approximately ten percent of the region's increase in the number of households between 1998 and 2005. Household Size Household size is a significant factor in housing demand. Often household size can be used to predict the unit size that a household will select. For example, small households (one to two persons per household) traditionally can find suitable housing in units with zero to two bedrooms while larger households (three or more persons per household) can usually find suitable housing in units with three to four bedrooms. However, people's choices also reflect preference and economics. Thus, many small households prefer and obtain large units. Household size is also related to choice of locations. For example, the small household (single person/elderly) is usually not as concerned with the quality of the school system in an area. In 1998, the average number of persons per household in the San Diego region was 2.83 persons per household. Chula Vista has an average of 3.0 persons per household, representing a slight increase from the 2.8 household size in 1990. The preponderance of new single-family homes built in Chula Vista in recent years has contributed to the increase in the average number of persons per household. Single-family homes are typically larger, have more bedrooms, and therefore are able to house a larger number of people than a smaller unit. Household Income Income levels influence the range of housing prices within a community and the ability of the population to afford housing. As household income increases, the number of homeowners increases. As household income decreases, the number of households paying a disproportionate amount of their income for housing and the number of persons occupying unsound and overcrowded housing increased. The 1998 median household income of $42,516 in Chula Vista is very close to the region's median of $42,350. Table 1-5 shows the distribution of the household income. The income distribution in Chula Vista is very similar to that of the region as a whole. Page 12 of 103 September 2GGO A-# HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 TABLE 1-5 HOUSEHOLD INCOME DISTRIBUTION Chula Vista SanUiegoRegion Income No. Percent Percent Less than $10,000 3,869 7.2% 7.2% $10,000 to $14,999 3,334 6.2% 5.8% $15,000 to $24,999 7,285 13.5% 13.6% $25,000 to $34,999 7,770 14.4% 14.3% $35,000 to $49,999 9,433 17.5% 18.8% $50,000 to $74,999 11,876 22.0% 20.6% $75,000 to $99,999 5,433 10.0% 9.6% $100,000 or more 4,968 9.2% 10.1% Total 53,968 100% 100% Source: SANDAG Population and HOUSing Estimates, January I, 1998. Overcrowding According to SANDAG's review of overcrowding region wide, the combination of low income and high housing costs has forced many households to live in overcrowded conditions. The term "overcrowded" is applied to units with 1.01 or more persons per room exclusive of the kitchen and bathroom(s)l. IdentifYing the extent of overcrowded problems can serve as a warning sign that the community does not have an adequate supply of affordable housing and/or housing units for large families. According to the 1990 Census, there are 5,193 overcrowded housing units in Chula Vista, representing about 10.4 percent of the 49,849 total housing units. Region wide 17.5 percent of all housing units are overcrowded indicating that there is comparatively less overcrowding in Chula Vista than region wide. Of those overcrowded units in Chula Vista 1,794 (35 percent) are owner-occupied and 3,399 (65 percent) are renter occupied. Region wide overcrowded households are 27.3 percent owner- occupied and 72.6 percent renter-occupied. I Under state law a housing unit is not considered overcrowded if there is at least 120 square feet of liveable space for the first two people and an additional 50 square feet for each additional person. Liveable space includes all rooms except the bath, kitchen, and hallways. Note however that data are not available by this definition. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A"'~~ Page 13 of 103 September 2gg9 Overpayment Measuring the portion of a household's gross income that is used for housing can indicate the affordability of housing within a community. State and federal programs typically define housing cost burden as those lower-income households paying over 30 percent of household income for housing costs. Based upon the 1990 Census Data, 18,102 households or 38 percent of all households in Chula Vista pay more than 30 percent of their household income for housing as compared to 41 percent in the region. 6,991 of these households experience a severe housing cost burden, paying more than 50 percent of their income towards housing costs. Of the 18,102 households experiencing a housing cost burden, 58 percent are renter households and 42 percent are homeowners. Those extremely low-, very low- and low-income renter households are more greatly affected. Approximately 83 percent of extremely low-income, 87 percent of very low-income, and 56 percent of low-income renters are paying more than 30 percent of their income towards housing costs. Approximately 64 percent of extremely low- income, 49 percent of very low-income, and 39 percent of low-income homeowners are paying more than 30 percent of their income towards housing. Special Needs Groups There are some population groups that have been identified as having a need for special or alternative types of housing. These special need populations have difficulty finding appropriate housing to meet their needs due to economic, social, mental, or physical conditions. These groups are the elderly, persons with disabilities, large families, single-parent households, the homeless, farm workers, day laborers, and students. Many of these groups overlap. For example, many farm workers are homeless and many elderly people have a disability. The Elderly The limited incomes of many elderly persons often make it difficult for them to find affordable housing. In the San Diego region, the elderly spend a higher percentage of their income for food, housing, medical care, and personal care than non-elderly families. Many elderly persons need some form of housing assistance. In 1990,6.3 percent of the San Diego region's residents aged 65 and over were living in poverty. The elderly population comprises about 12 percent of the estimated population in ChuIa Vista or 18,515 persons according to SANDAG's March 31, 1998 Demographic Characteristics estimates. Elderly is defined as 65 years or older. The housing needs of the elderly include supportive housing, such as intermediate care facilities, group homes, and other housing that may include a planned service component. Needed services related to the elderly households include personal care, health care, housekeeping, meals, personal emergency response, and transportation. Page 14 of 103 September 2999 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /I-~ According to the 1990 Census data for the City, approximately 6,199 elderly households are low- income and a majority, (58 percent) are homeowners. Of those elderly households renting their home, 40 percent are estimated to pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing. Elderly households constitute nearly 31 percent of all Chula Vista low-income households (20,290 households). Of the total low-income renter households 20 percent are elderly, and of the total low-income homeowners, nearly half (49 percent) are elderly. Persons with Disabilities According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census, a person is considered to have a disability if he or she has difficulty performing certain functions (seeing, hearing, talking, walking, climbing stairs, and lifting and carrying), or has difficulty with certain social roles (doing school work for children or working at a job for adults). A person who is unable to perform one or more activities, uses an assistive device to get around, or who needs assistance from another person to perform basic activities is considered to have a severe disability. The U.S. Bureau of the Census estimates that ten percent of the total population in the United States has a severe disability and that 20 percent has some kind of disability.2 Applying these rates to Chula Vista would result in a 1998 estimate of 16,000 persons with severe disabilities and 32,000 with some kind of disability. The 1990 U.S. Census lists 7,191 persons living in Chula Vista, between the ages of 16 and 64, as having a work, mobility, or self-care limitation. Four factors - affordability, design, location, and discrimination - significantly limit the supply of housing available to households of persons with disabilities. Most homes are inaccessible to people with mobility and sensory limitations. Housing is needed that is adaptable to widened doorways and hallways, access ramps, larger bathrooms, lowered counter tops, and other features necessary for accessibility. Location of housing is also an important factor for many persons with disabilities as they often rely on public transportation to travel. Group housing, shared housing, and other supportive housing options can help meet the needs of persons with disabilities. These housing options often have the advantage of social service support on-site or readily accessible. 2SANDAG Regional Housing Needs Statement, p. 42. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /1-.37 Page 15 of 103 September 20g0 TABLE 1-6 MOBILITY AND SELF-CARE LIMITATION BY AGE Ujito64Y~lJ,rs 65 to 74 Y~lJ,rs '75+y~lJ,rs Total Mobility limitation only 1,120 509 803 2,432 Self-care limitation only 2,093 427 237 2,757 Mobility and self-care 955 349 698 2,002 limitation only Total 4,248 1,424 1,738 7,191 Source: 1990 U.S. Census (STF3), Table P69 Disabilities can hinder the ability of a person to earn adequate income. "The U.S. Bureau of the Census estimates that 70 percent of all people with severe disabilities are unemployed and rely upon fixed monthly disability incomes which are rarely adequate for the payment of market rate rent.,,3 The California Right to Housing Campaign estimates that 15 percent of persons with disabilities in the State of California were living below the poverty level in 1988. Housing advocacy groups report that people with disabilities are often the victIms of discrimination in the home buying market. People with disabilities, whether they work or receive disability income, are often perceived to be a greater financial risk than persons without disabilities with identical income amounts. The nonprofit National Home of Your Own Alliance estimates that only two percent of this population own their home compared to the overall homeownership rate of 66 percent.4 Large Families Large families, defined as five or more persons, usually require units with three or more bedrooms and pay a larger part of their monthly income for housing. They often have lower incomes and frequently live in overcrowded smaller units, which can result in accelerated unit deterioration. According to 1990 census data, 6,592 (14 percent) ofChula Vista's 47,824 total households are large families of five or more persons as compared to 13 percent region wide. Of those 6,592 large-family households in Chula Vista, 4,088 (62 percent) are owners and 2,504 (38 percent) are renters. Single Parents Single parents comprise a significant portion of lower-income households "in need." Single- parent households often require special consideration and assistance because they tend to have lower incomes and a greater need for day care, health care, and related facilities. (SANDAG:RHNS:page 137) 3National Partners in Homeownership, KeyNotes, "Reaching People with Disabilities," 1998, Page 3. 41bid Page 16 of 103 September ZQllll HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 ,4-J8' 1990 census data indicate that 10.31 percent of the City's total households are headed by single parents as compared to 9.3 percent region wide. Of these 4,902 households in Chula Vista, 994 (20 percent) are headed by males and 3,908 (80 percent) by females. Of the female single-parent households, 1,411 live below the poverty level, that is three percent of the total households. Homeless Throughout the country and the San Diego region, homelessness has become an increasing problem. Factors contributing to the rise in homelessness include a lack of housing affordable to low and moderate income persons, increases in the number of persons whose incomes fall below the poverty level, reductions in subsidies to the poor, drug/alcohol abuse, and the de- institutionalization of the mentally ilL The most recent legislation governing housing elements (Section 655831[1][6]) mandates that municipalities address the special needs of homeless persons within their jurisdictional boundaries. As defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development an individual or family who is homeless: I. Lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence; or 2. Has a primary nighttime residence that is: · A supervised publicly or privately operated shelter designed to provide temporary living accommodations (including welfare hotels, congregate shelters, and transitional housing for the mentally ill); . An institution that provides a temporary residence for individuals intended to be institutionalized; or . A public or private place not designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings. This definition does not include persons living in substandard housing (unless it has been officially condemned); persons living in overcrowded housing, or persons being discharged from mental health facilities (unless the person was homeless when entering and is considered to be homeless at discharge). A report prepared by the Regional Task Force on the Homeless in May 1998 states that the total homeless population in San Diego County is estimated at 15,000, with approximately 47 percent or 7,000 persons being resident farm workers and day laborers. Within Chula Vista the homeless population is estimated at 500 urban homeless and 100 homeless day laborers. Approximately 158 of the total homeless population are enrolled in local transitional shelter programs each day. According to South Bay Community Services (SBCS), the homeless in Chula Vista are primarily families and many of those are the result of domestic violence. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 ,A - ,3" Page 17 of 103 Septem"ger 2111111 The Regional Task Force on Homeless estimates that families account for approximately 25 percent of the urban homeless population in the region and probably represent the fastest growing segment of this population. Studies conclude that half are victims of domestic violence. Single adults account for approximately 70 percent of the urban homeless. The majority of single adults are young males. Approximately 40 percent of urban single-homeless men are veterans. The remaining homeless population is comprised of chronically homeless youth and elderly persons. Social service and homeless providers address the supportive service needs of the homeless, as well as housing needs. The many and various needs of the homeless include emergency shelter, transitional housing, social services (i.e., job counseling/training), mental health services, and general health services. Existing service agencies indicate that a growing need exists for limited- term shelter or transitional facilities for homeless individuals and families. Emergency Shelters and Transitional Housing Facilities Many organizations located in other cities offer shelter for the homeless population currently residing in Chula Vista. Table 1-7 lists the shelter locations both in and near Chula Vista that are known to serve Chula Vista's homeless population. South Bay Community Services (SBCS) is the primary social service agency that provides homeless shelter and services within Chula Vista. SBCS operates four transitional living programs in Chula Vista and participates in the FEMA and County of San Diego HotellMotel Voucher Program. TABLE 1-7 SHELTERS FOR THE HOMELESS SERVING SAN DIEGO - SOUTH BAY Agericies Program Name Target SpecialNeeds Bed City Population Spaces Seasonal Emergency Shelter Ecumenical ISN Rot'l Shelter - South General General Council of SO Bay (mid Oct- Population Homeless 12 Regional County March) Transitional Shelter MAAC Project Nosotros Adult Men Only Substance 13 Chula Abuse Vista South Bay Casa Nuestra General Chula Comm. Services Shelter Homeless Youth Homeless 8 Vista (SBCS) SBCS Casa Nueva Families General 45 Chula Vida Shelter w/Children Homeless Vista Families Victims of Chula SBCS Casa Segura w/Children Domestic 40 Vista Violence Page 18 of 103 8eptem13el' 20g0 /1- 40 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 Agencies Program Name Target Special Needs Bed City Population Spaces Transitional Families General Chula SBCS Housing w/Children Homeless 40 Vista Program Winter Hotel/Motel Vouchers (November through April) MAAC Project Hotel/Motel Families At-Risk Vouchers w/Children w/disability SBCS Hotel/Motel Families At-Risk Vouchers w/Children w/disability Total Beds 158 Definitions: Seasonal Emergency Shelter A program which provides shelter and support services during a limited portion of late Fall and Winter months. Transitional Housing Temporary housing and support services to return people to independent living as soon as possible, and not longer than 24 months. Source: Regional Task Force on the Homeless Homeless Prevention Programs and Services For the last few years, the City has allocated Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) funds to SBCS for youth and family support services, housing services, and economic development opportunities. Located in Chula Vista, SBCS offers assistance to persons who are "near homeless" through coordination of available services and financial resources and counseling in such matters as financial management and family support. For those persons or households who may be threatened with homelessness due to financial difficulties, Consumer Credit Counselors of San Diego and Imperial County is a non-profit organization that helps persons or households in financial difficulties. Their offices are located in Chula Vista. They provide educational classes teaching the wise use of credit and money management, and using community resources, counseling, and debt management programs for those who want to avoid bankruptcy. Farm Workers and Day Laborers Farm workers and day laborers are described as those individuals who live in the area and work regularly in the fields or in causal labor situations. Due to the rapid suburbanization of Chula Vista, very little of the County's agricultural employment base is left in the area. According to SANDAG's 1995 Employment Inventory, there are only 63 agricultural workers in Chula Vista, which is only 0.2 percent of the employment base, and 0.6 percent of the workers in agriculture, forestry, fishing, and mining region wide. Chula Vista's day laborers may work on small construction jobs and odd jobs. Similar to the farm workers, day laborers are often here temporarily and may choose to be homeless in order to send their earnings home to their families rather than using their resources for housing. This was HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 I/-tll Page 19 of 103 September 2g9g seen in 1995 when the City of San Diego met some resistance from farm workers and day laborers who were offered to be relocated from encampments into apartments. It is difficult to provide an accurate estimate of this population due to this population's geographical, linguistic, and cultural isolation. The Regional Task Force on the Homeless has roughly estimated a rural homeless population of 100 day laborers in Chula Vista. Almost all are single men. Students Students can impact housing demands in areas that surround universities and colleges. Typically students are low-income and are therefore affected by a lack of affordable housing, especially within easy commuting distance from campus. They often seek shared housing situations or live with their parents to decrease expenses and can be assisted through roommate referral services offered on- and off-campus. Chula Vista is the location of Southwestern Community College with an enrollment of 17,716 for Fall 1999. Most (70 percent) are part time students and only 27 percent are new enrollees. The average age is 26.8 and 83 percent are ethnic minorities. Sixty-six percent of the students intend to continue their education at a four-year University. The majority of students are employed and 37 percent live in Chula Vista. When surveyed about their needs, none indicated a need for housing. There is no housing office on campus and the college administrators have not heard about housing problems from the students. The Olympic Training Center represents a unique student need in Chula Vista. Approximately 120 of the athletes require short-term stays of one to two months and use the four dormitories at the Center. Approximately 75 athletes require year-round housing, 25 of whom reside at the Center and 50 reside in the nearby community. The average age is 25 years and the average income is under 50 percent of the area median income. Approximately 75 percent are female and 25 percent are male. Page 20 of 103 September 2QQQ A- ,,~ HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 Land Use Characteristics In 1995,74 percent of the land in Chula Vista was developed, leaving 3,578 developable acres. Since 1995, Chula Vista has annexed additional lands that significantly increase the development capacity in the City. Western and Eastern Chula Vista have distinctive land use character. Western Chula Vista is completely developed with opportunities for minor in-fill projects, housing rehabilitation, and redevelopment. Eastern Chula Vista is a newly developing area characterized by master planned communities. In 1997, Chula Vista annexed approximately 9,089 acres of vacant land in Eastern Chula Vista, most of which was subject to a joint planning effort with the County of San Diego. Two additional master planned areas, San Miguel Ranch and Bonita Meadows, are expected to annex into the City prior to 2004. In Western Chula Vista an estimated 83.89 acres are vacant, for a potential of 519 units. In Eastern Chula Vista there is capacity for approximately 29,565 units (this includes the capacity of the two areas that are expected to annex by 2004). Employment Characteristics In the San Diego region, employment growth out paced population growth between 1980 and 1990. The decade recorded a gain of more than 313,400 jobs, an increase of 47.4 percent, while population increased by 629,772 people, a growth rate of 34 percent. During the recession, between 1990 and 1996, employment grew only four percent (39,800) while population grew 8.1 percent (202,021 people).5 Between 1990 and 1994 more low paying than high paying jobs were created in the San Diego region. High paying jobs increased by 31.4 percent while low paying jobs increased by over 43 percent. In addition, the real wages of high paying jobs have decreased seven percent, while wages in low}laying jobs have decreased 15 percent over the same time period (wages adjusted for inflation). Chula Vista is forecasted to be one of the fastest growing employment centers in the region because of land available for employment center development, access to major transportation corridors such as Interstate 8 and 805, and its proximity to the U.S.-Mexico International Border. 5 Source: SANDAG Evaluating Economic Prosperity in the San Diego Region: 1998 Update page 56 6 Source: SANDAG Evaluating Economic Prosperity in the San Diego Region: 1998 Update page 6 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-43 Page 21 of 103 Septemeer 29g9 Table 1-8 indicates major employers in the City of Chula Vista and approximate number of employees. TABLE 1-8 CHULA VISTA MAJOR EMPLOYERS BitsilleS$ Type JJ)Jlllj!6yees Non-Retail B.F.Goodrich Aerospace (formerly Rohr, Inc.) Manufacturing 2,344 Sharp ChuIa Vista Medical Center Hospital 883 Scripps Memorial Hospital Hospital 660 American Fashion, Inc. Manufacturing 388 United Parcel Service Parcel Delivery 311 Retail Wal-Mart General Merchandise 349 Costco Wholesale (2 stores) General Merchandise 336 Warehouse Sears Department Store 300 Target (2 stores) General Merchandise 244 Warehouse Albertsons ( 2 stores) Grocery Store 226 Macy's Department Store 211 K - Mart (2 stores) General Merchandise 207 Warehouse Home Depot Building Supplies 206 Source: City ofChula Vista Fmance Department Page 22 of 103 September Z(}(}(} HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /i~ t./ 'I Table 1-9 provides a 25-year projection of employment growth by sector for Chula Vista. TABLE 1-9 PROJECTED EMPLOYMENT BY SECTOR CHULA VISTA 1995 - 2020 EmploYJ1leritSector 1995 2005 2010 2020 1995 -2020 Change Number Perceut Civilian Employment 45,996 67,643 73,200 87,533 41,537 90.3% Manufacturing 5,534 6,861 6,528 6,301 767 13.9% Transp., Comm., & Utilities 1,698 2,463 2,534 2,816 1,118 65.8% Wholesale Trade 2,208 4,096 4,779 6,172 3,964 179.5% Retail Trade 10,485 13,944 14,638 16,587 6,102 58.2% Finance, Ins. & Real Estate 2,318 3,418 4,050 5,541 3,223 139.0% Services 11,108 18,653 20,436 25,905 14,797 133.2% Government 7,632 10,897 12,331 14,516 6,884 90.2% Other- 5,013 7,311 7,904 9,695 4,682 93.4% Military Employment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Employment 45,996 67,643 73,200 87,533 41,537 90.3% Employment Housing Ratio 0.85 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.05 6% -Employment in agriculture, mining, and construction industries, and self-employed and domestic workers. Source: SANDAG Preliminary 2020 Forecast, February 1999 Employment is projected to increase by 21,647 jobs or 47 percent between 1995 and 2005, with the greatest numeric increases occurring in the services, government, and retail sectors (7,545, 3,265, and 3,459 jobs respectively). Given that retail trade and service jobs are traditionally lower paying, the need for affordability in the local housing market for these employees may be magnified, assuming that those retail trade and service employees also reside within the community. Housing should be created to match the growth of jobs and the corresponding average wages. Should housing be unaffordable to those in these growing job sectors, these employees must seek housing in surrounding communities where housing costs are lower. Commuting Patterns Commuting patterns demonstrate the relation of housing to employment opportunities and are a component in the allocation of growth to localities. As a result of the increase in the economic base, employment levels and physical separation of housing and employment sites, the number of people commuting to work has increased. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-"~ Page 23 of 103 8eptemher 2(l(ll.) The majority (73.6 percent) of Chula Vista residents drove alone to work as compared to 71 percent region wide, according to the 1990 census. Approximately 20 percent car-pooled or took public transportation. The remainder rode bikes, walked, or worked at home. The mean-travel time to work was 22 minutes. Housinl! Stock Characteristics In 1998, Chula Vista had a housing stock of 56,250 units. This is a growth of 12.8 percent from the 1990 total units of 49,849, which compares to a 7.3 percent increase region wide. Projected Housing Units Table 1-10 presents the housing unit projections for the City ofChula Vista and the San Diego County Region. The City's rate of increase between 1998 and 2005 in housing is more than double that of the region (31 percent vs. 13 percent). The approximately 17,000 new units will generally keep pace with the forecasted population increase of 46,000. TABLE 1-10 PROJECTED HOUSING UNITS I) , 'Year ChlllaViSta Region 1995 53,961 996,684 1998 53,968 1,014,859 2005 70,928 1,153,736 2010 80,775 1,245,057 2020 96,518 1,404,231 Total Increase 42,557 407,547 % Increase 79% 41% Source: SANDAG Preliminary 2020 Cities/County Forecast, February 1999; State DOF March 1998 Housing Type In 1998, the largest percentage (48.5 percent) of housing units in Chula Vista was single-family detached units, as compared to 50 percent region wide. Table 1-11 below presents the type of housing units in Chula Vista in 1998. Page 24 of 103 Se~tember 2111111 A- c1t,. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 TABLE 1-11 TYPE OF HOUSING UNITS, 1998 Total Single Single Multi- Multi- Mobile Jurisdiction Hou$ing F1llrnily F1afuily Family Family Homes UnIts Attached Detached 2-4 Units 5+ Units Chula Vista 56,250 4,353 27,320 4,113 16,732 3,732 Region 1,014,859 88,128 508,020 74,430 297,373 46,908 Source: California State Department of Finance, January, 1999 Table 1-12 shows that all types of housing units in Chula Vista will significantly increase between 1998 and 2020, with the exception of mobile homes, which is anticipated to decrease. TABLE 1-12 PROJECTED HOUSING UNIT TYPE CHULA VISTA, 1998-2020 Housing %of %of %of % of 1998 Total 2005 Total. 2010 Total 2020 Total Type Housing Housing Housing Housing Single- 31,673 56.3% 40,990 57.8% 46,091 57% 54,180 56.1% Family Multi-Family 20,845 37.1% 26,285 37% 31,068 38.5% 38,607 40% Mobilehomes 3,732 6.6% 3,653 5.2% 3,616 4.5% 3,731 3.9% Total Housing 56,250 100% 70,928 100% 80,775 100% 96,518 100% Source: SANDAG Preliminary 2020 Cities/County Forecast, February 1999 Housing Age Age of housing is often an indicator of housing conditions. Many federal and state programs use age of housing as one factor to determine housing needs and the availability of funds for housing and/or community development. Based on the 1990 census, approximately 13,000 units in Chula Vista are now or will be 50 years of age or older by 2004, meaning that older housing comprises approximately 23 percent of the total 1998 housing stock. The older homes are primarily located in western Chula Vista. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 t1-c./7 Page 25 of 103 September 2000 TABLE 1-13 AGE OF HOUSING STOCK ..~. ...... Units No. Percellt Pre-1940 1,003 2% 1940-1949 3,474 6% 1950-1959 9,272 17% 1960-1969 11,518 21% 1970-1979 12,902 23% 1980-1989 11 ,680 21% 1990-1997 5,409 10% Total 55,258 100% These older units are a source of affordable housing stock for low- and moderate-income residents as rents and sales prices are usually lower the older the home. It is important for Chula Vista to preserve these units as affordable housing stock through careful monitoring, code enforcement, and rehabilitation. Housing Condition Housing condition is often defined in terms of substandard housing. Substandard housing units include those in need of repair and those in need of replacement. Indicators of the number of substandard housing units within a jurisdiction can include units built before 1940 or those lacking plumbing facilities. Age of housing or the lack of plumbing facilities is not always indicators of substandard conditions. Units may be considered substandard by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) if they were built before 1940 and have a value ofless than $35,000. Only two percent ofChula Vista's housing stock was built prior to 1940 (Table 1-13). These pre-1940 homes are primarily located in western Chula Vista. Of the 19,838 owner occupied housing units reported in the 1990 Census, only 106 units or 0.5 percent were valued less than $35,000. According to the 1990 Census, 168 units lacked complete plumbing facilities. Of those units with plumbing deficiencies, 161 of the units were owner occupied and seven were rental units. Housing Tenure The total estimated number of occupied dwelling units for April 1990 was 47,824 according to the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Of these units, 24,487 (53 percent) were owner occupied and 22,337 (47 percent) were renter occupied. Region wide, 54 percent of the residents owned their own homes. Page 26 of 103 SeptemBer 2000 11- 41 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 Vacancy Rates Vacancy rates are an indication of housing supply and demand. High vacancy rates may indicate an over supply of housing and/or low demand for such housing. ,A prolonged high vacancy rate tends to discourage new construction, especially multi-family residential development. A low vacancy rate indicates a high demand relative to supply. A prolonged low vacancy rate tends to elevate rents in the rental stock. Vacancy rates between two to three percent are usually considered healthy for single-family housing; and five to six percent for multi-family housing. However, vacancy rates are not the sole indicator of market conditions, they must be viewed in the context of all the characteristics of the local and regional market. The region experienced low vacancy rates from 1974 to 1984. The increase in vacancy rates after 1984 was attributed to 1981 tax incentives that resulted in the construction of more rental properties. This increase in new units caused the vacancy rate for multi-family units to rise to a height of 8.9 percent in 1987. By 1990 vacancy rates had fallen to 6.2 percent. The San Diego County Apartment Association is the primary source of vacancy rate information in the San Diego region. The Apartment Association sends out surveys to its member rental property owners and managers throughout San Diego County twice a year. As this represents only a sampling of rental properties, the numbers do not represent the entire housing stock, but they assist in analyzing vacancy trends throughout the region. TABLE 1-14 VACANCY RATES CHULA VISTA 1996 TO 1999 Time Period Covered Units Surveyed Number Vacant PercenfVacant Fall 1996 1,953 84 4.3% Fall 1997 3,844 110 2.9% Fall 1998 5,090 69 1.4% Spring 1999 3,951 65 1.1% Fall 1999 6,040 44 0.5% Source: San Diego County Apartment ASSOCIatIOn, 1996-1998. With the recession over and continued growth in the region, vacancy rates have substantially declined. This coincides with an increase in rental rates. This trend will affect housing shortages, over-crowding and over-payment, particularly among low-income households. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 ,1/-49 Page 27 of 103 September 2090 Housing Costs Housing costs are indicative of housing accessibility for all economic segments of the community. Typically, if housing supply exceeds housing demand, housing costs will fall. If housing demand exceeds housing supply, housing costs will rise. In Chula Vista, housing costs are less than the median for the entire region as shown on Table 1-15. TABLE 1-15 HOUSING COSTS - 1998 Median Costaf , Averllgellellts " Resale HousWg Studio 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms 3 bedrooms Chula Vista $177,000 $390 $542 $638 $692 Carlsbad $285,000 $480 $618 $781 $2,500 La Mesa $185,000 $487 $578 $707 $930 EI Cajon $184,000 $405 $485 $581 $807 Imperial Beach $144,000 $440 $489 $598 $790 Oceanside $168,000 $466 $556 $697 $889 San Diego Region $195,500 $448 $543 $685 $916 Source: SANDAG Regional Housing Needs Statement, 1999 At-Risk Units Housing element law requires jurisdictions to provide an analysis and program for preserving affordability of assisted housing developments that are eligible to change from low-income housing uses during the next 10 years. Currently, there are two housing developments (the Meadows of Chula Vista and Eucalyptus Parkview Apartments) which have units at risk of conversion to market rate housing within the next ten years. There are no HUD 236 contracts scheduled to expire during this period. The Meadows of Chula Vista is an 80 unit elderly-person complex, 32 units of which are low- income units. The earliest date of conversion is 2000. Eucalyptus Parkview apartments is a 53- unit complex, nine of which are low-income units. The earliest date of conversion is 2008. The units in both these complexes were created through a density bonus program at a time when the units were located in the unincorporated area of the County of San Diego. The estimated market value per unit is $45,000. Costs of New Unit or Preservation of Existing The estimated cost for producing new units to replace these 35 one bedroom and 6 two bedroom low-income units is $4,474,532. This estimate reflects an estimated average direct production cost as follows: Page 28 of 103 Se~tember 2ggg A - ~'"l) HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 TABLE 1-16 A VERAGE PRODUCTION COSTS OF HOUSING Description Costs 1 Bedroom 2 Bedrooms (650sqft) (800 sq ft) Land Costs $25,000 per unit 25,000 25,000 Parking/Landscaping/Common $20,000 per unit 20,000 20,000 Areas Construction Costs $63/sq ft 40,950 50,400 Chula Vista Developer Fees $21,802 per unit 21,802 21,802 TOTAL $107,752 $117,202 This cost could increase depending on land costs and infrastructure needs to support the construction of new low-income units. The estimated cost of preserving the units by purchasing an affordability covenant is shown on Table 1-17 below. TABLE 1-17 ESTIMATED COST OF RENT SUBSIDIES CHULA VISTA, 1999 No. Annual Development Assisted Market Assisted Affordability Total Subsidy Units Rent Rent Gap Gap/month Required Meadows 32 $497 to $446 to $51 to $46 $1,600 (@ $19,200 1055 Granjas $507 $461 $50/month) Eucalyptus $700 to $575 to $1,125 Parkview 9 $875 $725 $125 to $150 (@$125/month) $13,500 56 Fourth Ave Given the cost of new construction as compared to preservation, the City of Chula Vista will explore the option of purchasing affordability covenants for the 41 low-income units at these two apartment complexes. Subsidy payment would be made annually, and would most likely be funded with redevelopment set-aside funds or Community Development Block Grant funds. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 II-S'I Page 29 of 103 September 2ggg This page is intentionally blank. Page 30 of 103 Sertember 2Qllll A- $"<< HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 II. Constraints to Housing Provision Actual or potential constraints on the provision of housing and the cost of housing affect the development of new housing and the maintenance of existing units for all income levels. Governmental and non-governmental constraints are discussed below. Governmental Constraints Governmental constraints can limit the operations of the public, private and nonprofit sectors making it difficult to meet the demand for affordable housing and limiting supply in the region. Governmental constraints include growth management measures, land use controls, building codes, processing fees, and site improvement costs. Rell:ional Land Supply The San Diego region is growing with a population growth of nearly one million persons over the next twenty years and a need for approximately 360,000 new homes to accommodate this growth. In accordance with SANDAG's 2020 Regionwide Forecast, based on current general plans, the region's single family home densities are too low, cities have designated an excessive amount of residential acreage for rural residential use and there is insufficient land planned for multifamily homes. In response to the anticipated growth of the region and the assessment of existing land use plans, SANDAG developed a strategy for regional growth management called Region 2020. The City of Chula Vista has adopted the "smart growth" reconnnendations in the Land Use Distribution of the Regional Growth Management strategy and has sufficient land planned for single family and multifamily homes. Land Use Controls Land use controls take a number of forms that affect the development of residential units. These controls implement the General Plan, which establishes the overall character and development of the community. Chula Vista's General Plan designates substantial areas of vacant land for residential development at a variety of densities. Most of the vacant land will be developed under the "Planned Community (PC) Zone" which permits varied densities and the use of flexible development standards. The section on Housing Opportunities presents more detailed information on the availability of residentially zoned land. In summary, there is sufficient vacant land in Eastern Chula Vista to accommodate 29,565 additional units. Of these units, 41 percent will be high density multi- family and another 11 percent will be in the 6 to 11 units/acre range which typically generates patio homes/townhomes. The remaining 48 percent are at densities for single-family homes. The Zoning Ordinance includes a Mobilehome Park (MHP) zone, density bonus provisions, mixed-use development zones, and the construction of residential projects in certain commercial zones. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 11- ~~ Page 31 of 103W6 September 2099 Chula Vista allows dwelling groups, two or more detached dwellings on one parcel with a common yard or court, by right in the R-2 zone and with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the RE & RI zones. All zones require site plan and architectural approval. Housing developments for seniors may be allowed in any zone except the R-l, R-2, C-V, C-T, and industrial zones. Because the residents of such developments have dwelling characteristics which differ from those of families and younger persons, it is not appropriate to apply all of the normal zoning standards. Senior housing is allowed with a CUP and the Planning Commission and City Council may make exceptions to the density, off-street parking, minimum unit size, open space, and such other requirements as may be appropriate. The Planning Commission and City Council may also adjust required setbacks, building height, and yard areas as appropriate to provide an adequate living environment both within the development and on nearby properties. Any exceptions and adjustments shall be subject to the condition that the development will be available for occupancy by seniors only. The City does not have a provision for accessory dwelling units. Accessory structures are a permitted use in any R zone, however they are not allowed to have a kitchen and are not intended as living quarters. Guest houses are permitted as accessory uses in the Agriculture and Residential Estate (RE) zones subject to provisions in the Municipal Code and not rented or otherwise conducted as a business. Growth Management The following growth management provisions exist in Chula Vista: a. Threshold Standards: Adopted in November 1987, the "thresholds" established performance criteria and standards for eleven public facilities and services to ensure residents' "quality- of-life" in conjunction with growth. They addressed such matters as minimum "Level of Service (LOS)" to be maintained on roadways, police and fire response times, minimum park acreage and library square footage per 1,000 persons, and guarantees for school, water, and sewer service as examples. b. The Standards included two types of implementation measures, those for application by staff on a project-by-project basis, and those to be applied Citywide on a periodic basis. For the latter, a Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) was formed and tasked with an annual review and report on Citywide compliance. c. Growth Management Element: Incorporated with the General Plan Update in April 1989, it sets forth the City's goals, objectives, and policies related to protection of residents' quality- of-life. This element established a City commitment consistent with the concept of the Threshold Standards and Controlled Residential Development Ordinance. d. Growth Management Program: Adopted in April 1991, it serves as the implementing mechanism for the Growth Management Element of the General Plan. It sets a foundation for carrying out City development policies by directing and coordinating future growth to ensure timely provision of public facilities and services. As such, its primary focus is Eastern Chula Vista where large tracts of vacant land are to be developed. The program Page 32 of 103 Septemher 2999 /I ~~-r/ HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 document sets forth guidelines for relating development phasing to facilities master plans at the project level, and establishes requirements for facilities guarantees at various stages of project planning and review. e. Growth Management Ordinance (Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 19.09): Enacted in May 1991, codifies Growth Management intents, standards, requirements, and procedures related to the review and approval of development projects. The principal foundation of the City's various measures is recognition that large scale future growth creates tremendous demands for public facilities and services, which if not adequately addressed, will result in shortages detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare. Development of the Growth Management Program involved preparation of several facilities master plans sufficient to support the land use base of the updated City General Plan consistent with adopted Threshold Standards. Preparation of those master plans included a comprehensive survey and analysis of existing conditions and levels of service. Although the Growth Management Program is targeted toward Eastern Chula Vista where large vacant tracts of land are being developed, Threshold Standards are applicable Citywide. Through the Implementing Ordinance (Chula Vista Municipal Code, Chapter 19.90) discretion is reserved to exempt those projects which through their size and/or location do not possess potential to significantly impact facilities and services. This level of significance is defmed through the environmental review process on each project, which specifically measures related facility and service needs, in comparison to Threshold Standards performance, and identifies if mitigating actions are necessary. In such instance that a project, due to its location and/or timing, is required to provide a facility(ies) exceeding its needs, a benefit assessment is made to determine the amount and/or location of additional developments being served, and appropriate financing mechanisms and reimbursement agreements are then established. The City's ability to accommodate its Regional Share allocation is not impacted, as the measures do not establish any form of building cap. Rather than attempting to artificially limit growth, the measures are aimed at ensuring adequate and timely services and facilities for growth produced by market forces. Building Codes and Code Enforcement The City's Planning and Building department administers and enforces the California Building Code, which ensures construction in accordance with widely adopted health and safety standards. The City does not vary from these standards. The City of Chula Vista administers code enforcement programs designed to protect the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. The City's Planning and Building department, in conjunction with the City Attorney's office, undertakes abatement proceedings for deteriorating and substandard housing or illegal housing units. The City's Code Enforcement Section of the A-~~ Page 33 of 103 September 2000 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 Planning and Building Department currently detects and abates violations of the State and City Housing and Health Codes as they relate to substandard housing. The Code Enforcement Section administers the Community Appearance Program in an attempt to educate and encourage corrections of Code violations from reaching a point of costly remedy. On- and Off-Site Improvements The City has a variety of requirements established by both the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, such as development standards and off-site improvements. These requirements are those necessary to ensure adequate livability and lasting value in housing such as sewers, streets, curb-gutter-sidewalk, lighting, drainage, recreational open space, parking, etc. The City allows for the reduction of standards to help offset costs for senior housing projects. The City also considers the reduction of standards to help offset costs and financial participation in the construction of infrastructure for those eligible housing projects as a method of "additional incentive" under the State's revised Density Bonus Provisions. Fees and Exactions According to the BrA's 1999 Development Impact Fee Survey, the City ofChula Vista ranked sixth out of the 18 jurisdictions and the County of San Diego in average total residential development impact fees as shown in Table II-I below. Since fee values vary between and sometimes within jurisdictions, a method was needed to compare fees across jurisdictions. To accomplish this task, a prototypical structure was created for residential development. For the prototypical structure, existing fee levels by individual jurisdictions were applied. The prototypical structure encompasses characteristics representative of development averages. The BrA created a prototypical structure for residential development based on a three-bedroom, two-bath, single-family home with a 2,000-square foot living area, 400-square foot garage, and a 240-square foot patio. The construction was Type V, wood frame construction. TABLE II-I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. AS LEVIED BY JURISDICTION, PER PROTOTYPE SAN DIEGO REGION, 1999 Solana Beach $32,458 Poway $29,974 Carlsbad $27,136 City of San Diego $26,586 San Marcos $24,267 ChillaVista $23,927 Santee $23,532 Escondido $20,999 Oceanside $20,695 Page 34 of 103 September 2000 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /1- ~~ Encinitas $18,850 Vista $17,041 County of San Diego $16,564 EI Cajon $12,460 'Impact fees include fees collected by non-city agencies (water, sewer, and school district fees) Source: BIA's 1999 Development Impact Fee Survey The ranking of these jurisdictions in respect to fees shows that cities with newly developing areas (where no facilities/services are now available) tend to have higher fees than those which are experiencing mostly in-fill development. Most new growth in the region will be in newly developing areas where high fees are needed to assure that new growth pays its way.' The effect of these high fees can be partially mitigated by inclusionary programs where the affordability of the units is assured and development costs (including fees) can be spread over a large and varied mixture of housing types. In general, the City requires affordable housing projects to pay the same fees as market rate residential developments. When faced with high or increased development costs, these projects do not have the ability to pass these costs on to the project due to their budget limitations and rent restrictions. According to affordable housing developers, permit processing fees and local development impact fees are one of the major governmental roadblocks to the production of affordable housing for low-income households. Based upon information obtained from tax credit applications of several affordable housing developments, local permit processing fees represent ten to fifteen percent (10 to 15%) of the development budget of these developments. Affordable housing developers strongly advocate the City to waive, reduce, or at a minimum, defer fees for affordable housing. Affordable Housing Program Inclusionary housing programs are seen as "the best, perhaps even the only, currently available means by which residential integration can be actively fostered" and housing affordable to a less affluent population provided.8 Without the availability of offsets and flexibility to such programs, inclusionary zoning can become a constraint or an exaction on new development b~ shifting the burden of subsidizing low income affordability from government to private builders. Chula Vista has an inclusionary policy which requires all projects of 50 or more dwelling units to provide ten percent of the housing for low- and moderate-income households, with five percent affordable to low-income households. The requirements primarily affect those master planned 'Proposition 13 significantly hampers a jurisdiction's ability to raise general fund revenues for facilities/services for new growth. 8 Mallach 1984. lnclusionarv Housing Programs: PoUcies and Practices. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research. Rut~ers Uniyersity. 9 Covle, Timothy. 1994. Barriers to Affordable Housin~. Memo for Housin~ Task Force Memebers, Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). Sacramento. CA. November 2. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /1-5"7 Page 35 of 103lW September 2000 projects in the developing eastern portion of Chula Vista. This program also provides for alternate methods of compliance including the dedication of land, off-site development, and in- lieu fee. The cost of compliance may be mitigated by regulatory concessions, waivers, bonuses, or financial assistance. The City typically participates financially in the development of affordable housing through a residual receipts loan to assist with development costs such as property acquisition and development fees. The City has also provided other regulatory concessions, such as reductions in parking and density bonuses as offsets. Processing and Permit Procedures The extent and duration of project processing varies widely by type of application. Residential projects requiring subdivision of land and additional regulatory approvals such as re-zonings will require longer periods of review than those for which only ministerial approvals are needed. Substantial delays in processing can exceed development estimates and leads to increased costs. The costs resulting from the additional review time helps determine the true cost of housing~ such costs are added to the price of housing and ultimately passed on to the consumer. The processing required, however, is necessary to comply with the law and ensure proper and thorough review without compromising environmental quality or public safety. Priority processing is utilized to reduce the processing time for the development of affordable housing. Through coordination with the Community Development Department, the Planning Division will continue to prioritize projects that provide affordable housing. The Planning and Building Department is structured to specialize staff in the various facets of planning a project (Community Planning Section, Environmental Section, Development Processing Section, etc). This enables staff with the greatest expertise on a particular aspect (such as environmental a review, design review, or site plan review) to "fast track" their review. Sections also coordinate internally to concurrently process all applications related to a single project, and in the case of large, master planned developments, staff teams are specifically assigned to process each development. Specialized staff teams and inter-division coordination results in substantial savings of time in achieving complete project approval and the start of construction. Affordable housing projects are extremely sensitive to processing and permit procedures that result in time delays. Such time delays in the processing of affordable housing projects lead to higher costs for the project and jeopardize available funding sources. When faced with high or increased development costs, these projects do not have the ability to pass costs on to the project due to their budget limitations and rent restrictions. Additionally, they are time sensitive due to the established deadlines for funding sources. Affordable housing developers strongly advocate the City to continue to utilize a fast track process for affordable housing. Federal and State Environmental Protection Regulations The CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) requires environmental review for most proposed discretionary actions and for certain projects, review under NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) is also required. The State and Federal Endangered Species Acts and Page 36 of 103lQ6 September 2gg9 A - .:re HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 the Clean Water Act can further affect project requirements, and in southern California, have largely brought about the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) which prescribes the assembly and management of large-scale habitat preserves to protect sensitive biological resources from the potential adverse affects of development. Chula Vista has a substantial amount of environmental constraints due to its natural resources, sensitive habitats and coastal location. Environmental reviews under the above noted regulations can directly affect the processing of projects and result in higher development costs. These costs are associated with the extent of required environmental evaluations and analysis, resulting mitigations, mandated public review periods, and the fees, timelines and requirements imposed by State and Federal agencies for the processing and granting of necessary permits. Costs resulting from the environmental review process are added to the cost of housing and are subsequently passed on to the consumer. However, the presence of these regulations helps to preserve the environment and ensure environmental safety and a better quality of life for residents. In order to minimize any delays, the City, whenever possible utilizes provisions within CEQA that allow for "tiering" of environmental reviews. This approach has been used for many of the residential master planned communities in the City's developing eastern area. The first tier review includes analysis of general issues and impacts associated with the overall development in a broader Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Subsequent tiers include analysis of narrower plans and projects within later EIRs and/or Negative Declarations, focusing only on the impacts of individual projects that implement the overall development plan. Therefore, projects within subsequent phases of the development may proceed without the need for substantial additional environmental review, which can lead to relatively faster processing ofthese individual projects. With further regard to the MSCP, while the set-aside of land for habitat preserves can affect the location and amount of land available for housing, Chula Vista's proposed preserve configuration is largely in keeping with open space areas already established in the City's current General Plan. As a result, the City's proposed MSCP Subarea Plan does not have a substantive affect on the availability and capacity of land planned for new housing. Although the costs associated with mitigating habitat loss and assembling the preserve lead to higher costs associated with development, the MSCP's comprehensive approach to establishing permissible development areas in relation to required preserve areas will effectively reduce the uncertainty as to mitigation requirements and costs for future development, than would have otherwise existed without the MSCP. Infrastructure Costs Proposition 13, a voter initiative which limits increases in property taxes except when there is a transfer of ownership, may have increased the cost of housing. The stream of nmds received from increasing property taxes had been used as source for the financing of public infi'astructure. Residential development cannot occur in the absence of supporting capital infrastructure such as streets, sidewalks, schools. parks. sewer. water, and electrical service. In tl1C aftermath of Proposition 13, municipalities have looked to other financing mechanisms to raise funds to pay for the necessary infrastructure. Public financing of infrastructure has turned HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /I-~' Page 37 of 1031Q3 September 2QQO toward revenue, lease-obligation, and other bond sources. Additionally, under California law, cities and counties have the authority to require developers to pay for infrastructure improvement through fees, the dedication of land to public use, or the construction of public improvements. The use of development fees in place of public debt accelerated rapidly in the aftermath of Proposition 13. To the extent that cities continue to raise development fees to recover the infrastructure costs associated with growth, there is a risk that such costs will result in higher housing prices that reduce housing affordability. In effect, the initiative forced local governments to pass on more of the costs of housing development to new home owners. The law also increased the initial cost of purchasing a home as future tax savings are imputed into the purchase price. Construction Defect Litigation With the cost of housing rising, there is a growing need to build more affordable, for-sale, single- family attached housing as a means to increase homeownership opportunities and affordable housing options. Construction defect litigation has served as a barrier to the production of this necessary rung in the housing ladder. California Civil Code provides that any construction defect action "may be brought against any person who develops real property or who is involved in the design and/or planning of the property". This provision, combined with the ten year statute of limitations, makes developers responsible for any defect that occurs, including ones that were not apparent at the time of construction. In the past decade, the expense of construction defect litigation and threat of litigation has resulted in a decrease in the number of new attached residential units being built (i.e., condominium, townhouse). From 1995 to 2000, numerous bills have been introduced to the State Legislature to address this issue. Construction defect litigation remains a barrier to the production of single-family attached housing. Page 38 of 103W3 September 2ggg //-'0 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 Non-Governmental Constraints A munber of private sector factors contribute to the cost of housing. In 1998, for the construction of a single-family home costing $215,400, construction materials and labor accounted for approximately 33 percent of the total development costs. Land and site improvement costs accounted for 37 percent of costs; developer overhead marketing and profit accounted for 14 percent; fees accounted for ten percent; and financing costs accounted for six percent. The following is a discussion of these factors and their impact on affordable housing development. Land Costs Residential land prices contribute significantly to the cost of new housing. Location factors such as proximity to freeway access, public facilities, coastal views, and such intangible factors as image and quality of life contributes to demand and price of land. The cost of improving the land, grading and added infrastructure are also major contributors. Land zoned for higher densities command higher market prices. In 1998, land costs in the San Diego region ranged from $65,000 to $230,000 per lot. 10 Residential land costs in Chula Vista, on average, are currently $200,000/acre, with the specific dollar/unit ratio obviously dependent upon zoning location and infrastructure. In surveying recent land purchases for several proposed single-family developments in the City, the average per lot cost for the raw land was approximately $40,000. Improved land costs can vary widely depending upon the amount of improvements necessary including the amount of site grading to create buildable lots. As an example, a recently approved master planned project with 1,900+ units, has an estimated per unit site work cost of $22,500. Construction Costs Construction costs are the second highest component of new housing. Construction costs are the total costs to developers exclusive of profit, but including fees, materials, labor, and financing. In 1998, multi-family housing construction costs in Chula Vista average about $50 per square foot, excluding fees, land costs, and parking. Single-family home construction range from $50 to $70 per square foot. The current housing recovery has left the region with a labor shortage that is leading to higher labor costs. I I IOSource: Building Industry Association, 1998 "Source: Building Industry Association, 1998 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 11-(..( Page 39 of 103 Septem"ger 2QOO Estimates used for the sample development pro-forma followed these cost assumptions: TABLE 11-2 COMPONENT COSTS IN MUL TI-F AMIL Y HOUSING New Construction Unit Price $105,000 Land $ 25,000 (24%) Hard Costs (improvements, const.) $ 60,000 (57%) Soft Costs (arch., eng., marketing, etc.) $ 20,000 (19%) Chula Vista also participates in three programs that use volunteer labor (sweat-equity): Habitat for Humanity, Caring Neighbors, and Christmas in October. These programs have assisted in creating new or conserving existing affordable housing. Availability of Financing In 1998, interest rates in the San Diego region had fallen to their lowest levels in 30 years. Finance costs comprised approximately six percent of the total construction cost for a single- family house, a decrease of one percent since 1990.12 Interest rates also affect homeownership opportunities. In September of 1998, the posted interest rate on resale single-family homes was 6.34 percent on a 30-year, fixed-rate loan with a 20 percent down payment. On the median-priced home in San Diego County costing $199,000, the monthly interest and principal payment would be $990. In April 1989 when interest rates peaked at 11.3 percent, the comparable monthly payment on a median-priced home costing $174,000 was $1,359. According to 1998 HMDA data analysis, multi-family lending was made available in every census tract in the City for the purposes of new construction and/or purchasing of existing housing complexes and home ownership. Citywide multi-family (5+ units) lending exceeded $18,088,000 on 37 loans, and $37,339,000 on 370 non-occupant loans. Homeownership mortgage lending exceeded $293,185,000 on 1,742 loans. Capital available for development of affordable housing includes: Redevelopment Set-Aside, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME funds, Federal and State Low-Income Housing Tax Credits, lending institutions' commitment under CRA, and Multi-family Revenue Bonds. "Source: Building Industry Association, 1998 Page 40 of 103 September 2090 /I-'~ HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 III. EVALUATION This section analyzes the City's accomplishments during the 1991-1999 housing element cycle. This is done by evaluating the previous housing element, the City's success in meeting its goals, City progress towards meeting its Coastal Zone requirements, and fulfillment of the fair share housing goals. The evaluation is used to formulate goals and programs to be included in the 1999-2004 housing element. Evaluation of Previous Housin2 Element The 1991-1996 Chula Vista Housing Element contained a series of goals related to new construction, rehabilitation, preservation, and housing assistance. The following section reviews progress in implementing each of these action items. Effectiveness and Progress During the 1991-1999 planning period, Chula Vista has consistently provided a variety of new housing opportunities, both single and multiple family, in seeking to achieve a "balanced community." The City has approved several large master planned residential communities, each offering a wide range of residential densities, commercial services/employment, industrial employment, and recreational opportunities in a coordinated living environment. In order to ensure economic integration of neighborhoods, the City's Affordable Housing Policy requires these and other residential developments over 50 units to provide a minimum of ten percent of the units to low- and moderate-income households. Two sets of goals were set forth in the 1991-1996 ChuJa Vista Housing Element, both of which were generated by SANDAG. The first as shown in Table III-I below is the SANDAG allocation of "Fair Share" of affordable housing needed. These were the goals used to determine if a jurisdiction is eligible to self-certify its 1999 Housing Element Update. Chula Vista had a Fair Share goal of 1,058 additional affordable housing opportunities and actually created 1,796. A listing of those 1,796 affordable housing opportunities created is provided in Appendix A to this document. Therefore, Chula Vista is eligible to self-certify its 1999 - 2004 Housing Element. TABLE III-I CHULA VISTA 1991-1999 FAIR SHARE AFFORDABLE HOUSING GOALS AND PERFORMANCE 1999 Housing Element 1991-1999 Affordable Affordable Housing Fair Housing Performance Totals Share Goals I ,058 1 ,796 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 11-'3 Page 41 of 103 September 2(l(l(l The second set of goals related to Regional Share of new home construction needs for all income groups. These goals are set forth in Table III-2 below. TABLE III-2 REGIONAL SHARE COMPARED TO ACTUAL UNIT CONSTRUCTION 1991-1999 Very Low- Moderate- Above Total Description Income Low-Income Income Moderate Units Regional Share I ,232 628 I 3 I 335 2,326 Units Built 133 261 1 ,013 4,803 6,210 This table shows that the City made progress towards providing its overall fair share of new construction, but fell short in the very low- and low-income categories. However, this is partially mitigated by the significant number of low- and very low-housing opportunities created through rental assistance. This indicates that in the 1999-2004 housing element cycle, the City should seek additional ways to work cooperatively with for-profit and non-profit corporations to meet the new housing needs oflower-income households. Specific Progress Related to Housing Objectives The following evaluates housing performance by the specific objectives set forth in the 1991- 1996 Housing Element. OBJECTIVE 1 Achievement of a balanced residential community through integration of low- and moderate- income housing throughout the City, and the adequate dispersal of such housing to preclude establishment of specific low-income enclaves. Implementine; Actions A. The Affordable Housing Program (AHP) requires a minimum of ten percent of each housing development of 50 or more units to be affordable to low- and moderate-income households, with at least one half of those units (five percent of project total units) being designated for low-income households. Responsible Agencies: Planning, Community Development Department, and Housing Advisory Committee. Quantified Objective: 437 newly constructed low-income units. Cumulative Results: 53 low-income units and 111 moderate-income units were constructed under the Affordable Housing Program. No in-lieu fees were collected. Page 42 of 103 SeptemBer 2Qllll /I-'cI HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 TABLE 111-3 AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY > Lo"" ~oderatelncoIDe Projects Goal Achieved GOlll Achieved Goal 437 0 0 0 Cordova 0 40 0 0 Sanibelle 0 0 0 72 Cabo 0 13 0 39 Total 437 53 0 111 Production of housing under this objective is directly the result of new home (market rate) construction. The objective set in 1991 of 437 assumed a level of market rate housing construction that did not materialize. OBJECTIVE 2 The provision of adequate rental housing opportunities and assistance to households with low and very low incomes, including those with special needs such as the elderly, handicapped, single-parent households, and large families. Implementine Actions A. Facilitate the Use of Federal Funding as Available. B. Facilitate the Use of State Funding as Available. C. Assist Non-profit Community Development Corporations. D. Encourage and Support Federally Assisted Housing Projects E. Support a Shared Housing Program F. Assist the County Housing Authority to Produce a Minimum of 80 Public Housing Units G. Encourage Use ofthe Density Bonus Program. H. Investigate Need for Single-Room Occupancy Hotels. Responsible Agencies: Planning Department, Community Development Department, and City Attorney. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 11-'-;- Page 43 of 103 September 2ggg Quantified Objectives and Cumulative Results: TABLE III-4 NEW RENTAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES De$c6ption Objectives Units Achieved Difference New Construction - Objective 2 Public Housing 80 38 (42) Senior Housing 75 75 0 Non-Profit Housing 69 18 (51) Density Bonus 63 3 (60) Senior Density Bonus 50 0 (50) Relocation Housing 100 28 (72) Subtotal 437 162 (275) Rental Assistance - Objective 2 New Section 8 (Certificates & Vouchers) 200 693 493 Shared Housing Program 300 243 (57) Subtotal 500 936 436 Total 937 1,098 161 From 1991-1999, the City continued to work cooperatively with non-profit corporations and other governmental agencies to leverage resources to create rental housing opportunities, and in many cases housing for large families. The funding sources for new construction included tax credits and HOME. Working with the County Housing Authority and the Article 34 referendum authority (granted by voters in 1978),38 family-sized public housing units were built. Section 8 rental assistance created the most affordable housing opportunities during this period. The City also assisted non-profit corporations such as South Bay Community Services (SBCS) with grants for capacity building as well as gap financing. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds were also used for shared housing services provided by the Lutheran Social Services. Three additional rental housing projects are underway and will be completed during the 1999- 2004 housing element cycle. Page 44 of 103 8eptemeer 2ggg /I.." HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 OBJECTIVE 3 The broadening of available housing types and the increase of home ownership opportunities for low- and moderate-income households. Implementing Actions A Expand Home Ownership Opportunities through the Affordable Housing Program B. Distribute General Marketing and Home-Loan Information to the Public C. Institute First-Time Home Buyer Loan Programs D. Implement Community Reinvestment Home Loan Programs E. Explore Equity Share or Deferred Loan Programs F. Explore Participation in Sweat-Equity Projects G. Inform Seniors of the Reverse Annuity Mortgage Program H. Investigate Feasibility of Applying for Mortgage Credit Certificates I. Pursue Additional Tax-Exempt Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds J. Encourage Educational Programs for Homeowners Responsible Agencies: Community Development Quantified Objective: There were no quantified objectives. Cumulative Results: The City was successful in its application for an allocation of Mortgage Credit Certificates (MCC) and initiated the MCC program in September 1991 and issued the first certificate in December 1991. During the planning period, the City has issued 206 MCCs, with approximately 45 percent for low-income households. A sweat-equity approach was achieved through the City's financial participation in a Habitat for Humanity project in Chula Vista. The City provided funds for rehabilitation costs. Working with a private developer, the City explored the need for Single Room Occupancy hotels and discovered a limited market and no continuing interest by the for-profit or non-profit community to build. This experience also reconfirmed the priority needed for family housing, especially large families. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /1-' ? Page 45 of 103 Se~tem8er 299g The City did not implement any specific homeowner education program or information distribution on the Reverse Annuity Mortgage. These programs, although generally good ideas, never rose high enough on the priority list and if implemented would not have resulted in new housing opportunities. OBJECTIVE 4 Preservation of mobilehome park living as a source of affordable housing. Implementing Actions A. Continue to provide grants to low-income families to rehabilitate their mobile homes through the Mobile Home Rehabilitation Grant Program (TrailerlMobilehome CHIP Program). B. Explore upgrading trailer parks to allow conversion to exclusive mobilehome park zones. C. Monitor and enforce the City's Rent Arbitration Ordinance to protect the rights of mobilehome residents in preserving this affordable housing alternative. To provide financial assistance to low-income residents requesting arbitration through the Rent Arbitration Assistance Fund. D. Monitor and enforce the City's Mobilehomeffrailer Park Conversion Ordinance to protect the rights of mobilehome residents. E. Assist mobilehome park residents to purchase their parks and convert to resident ownership by operating the City's Mobilehome Assistance Program and assisting with the application for other funding sources such as the State Mobilehome Assistance Program. F. Promote participation by referring eligible residents to the San Diego County Mobilehome Rent Assistance Program. G. Identify new programs in cooperation with the Western Mobilehome Park Owners Association to preserve the affordability of mobile home park residency. Responsible Agencies: Community Development Department, City Attorney, Planning Department, Building and Housing Department, and Mobilehome Issues Committee Quantified Objective: There were no quantified objectives. Cumulative Results: The City provided rehabilitation assistance to 287 low-income single-family and mobilehome owners. Page 46 of 103 September 2999 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A- ,g The City revised the rent arbitration ordinance to simplify the process, eliminate the fee and generally make it more user friendly. Implementing the ordinance is on-going and two to three cases of contested rent increases are heard each year. The Mobilehome/Trailer Park Conversion Ordinance has been triggered only once since 1991. The Twin Palms Mobile Home Park requested conversion. After hearings and analysis, closure of the Park was approved by the City Council. OBJECTIVE 5 The systematic renewal, rehabilitation, conservation, and improvement of the residential neighborhoods of the Chula Vista Planning Area. Implementing Actions A. Preserve At-Risk Affordable Housing Units B. Implement a Pro-active Neighborhood Improvement Program. C. Implement the Multi-Family Housing Inspection Program D. Removal of Dilapidated Structures E.. Implement Rehabilitation Programs F. Implement the Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP) G. Continue to Regulate Condominium and Stock Cooperative Conversions To Protect Existing Residents H. Encourage Educational Programs for Homeowners Responsible'Agencies: Community Development Department and Planning and Building Department. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /J- 6 ~ Page 47 of 103 Septemeer 2(l(l(l Quantified Objectives and Cumulative Results: TABLE III-5 HOUSING REHABILITATION Objectives Units Achieved Difference Rehabilitation & Conservation Objective 5 . At-Risk Units 528 300 (228) Single Family & Mobilehome Rehabilitation 200 213 13 Rental Rehabilitation 65 -0- (65) Total 793 513 (280) From 1990 to 1993 the City's Neighborhood Revitalization Program was implemented in the Otay neighborhood of Castle Park. CDSG funds were used to improve and enhance the area through various community design elements, upgrading infrastructure, and rehabilitation of homes. There were no proposals to convert apartments to condominiums or cooperatives. The City's Multi-family Housing Inspection program continues to be implemented. All multi- family housing in the City is inspected approximately every three years for conformance to minimum housing standards as established by State Law. The program accounts for 554 properties that include over 15,400 dwelling units. An additional 26 hotel/motel properties with over 1,600 units are inspected as well. OBJECTIVE 6 To provide housing assistance to individuals and families who are homeless and enable them to move back into permanent housing. Implementine Actions A. Participate in a Regional Approach to Address Homelessness B. Facilitate Transitional Housing Programs C. Identify Non-profit Providers to Operate Emergency Shelter Programs D. Support Existing Services for the Homeless Responsible Agencies: Community Development Department and Non-Profit Social Service Providers Page 48 of 103 September Zggg 19- 70 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 Quantified Objectives: New construction or rehabilitation of 20 units of transitional housing for very low-income homeless persons. Cumulative Results: The City's Redevelopment Agency provided Redevelopment Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Set-aside Funds to assist South Bay Community Services (SBCS) to acquire various properties for transitional housing programs. Casa Nueva Vida is a short-term housing development program for 25 homeless families. Additionally, Redevelopment funds and HOME funds were also provided to SBCS for two units of transitional housing for persons fleeing from domestic violence. The City has participated in regional approaches to addressing the needs of the homeless population. The City is represented on the San Diego County Regional Emergency and Shelter Program (FEMA) and the San Diego County Regional Continuum of Care Advisory Council. The City has provided financial assistance to the County of San Diego's Cold Weather Hotel/Motel Voucher Program since the implementation of the program in 1997. OBJECTIVE 7 Ensure the successful implementation of housing policies and programs through effective coordination, monitoring, and evaluation. Implementing Actions A. Review and Revise Affordable Housing Standards B. Implement an On-going Monitoring and Evaluation Program C. Establish an Affordable Housing Quality of Life Threshold Standard Responsible Agencies: Community Development, Planning and Building Department, and Housing Advisory Committee Quantified Objectives: N/A Cumulative Results: The City's Housing Advisory Committee continues to be involved with the implementation of housing policy through housing project review. The City Council becomes involved with the annual review of the Consolidated plan and periodic review of housing element implementation progress. Staff works with developers to implement the Affordable Housing Program, which is integral to the approval process of new developments with 50 or more units (ten percent of the units must be affordable). HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A -7/ Page 49 of 103 September 2000 OBJECTIVE 8 The elimination of racial, age, religious, sexual, and economic bias and discrimination in the housing provision, and to ensure fair lending practices. Implementine Actions A. Continue Fair Housing Counseling Services and Referral Activities B. Conduct the Annual Fair Housing Assessment C. Require Developers of Housing Projects (20 units or more) to Submit Affirmative Fair Marketing Plans Responsible Agencies: Community Development Department Quantified Objectives: N/A Cumulative Results: The City helps fund the Fair Housing Council of San Diego. This organization responds to questions about landlord/tenant issues. In July 1995, Community Development Department staff and the Fair Housing Council of San Diego compiled data for the Assessment of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice in the City of Chula Vista report. Additionally, the City contracts with the Fair Housing Council of San Diego to provide a fair housing education and counseling program through the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The annual report for the 5-year Consolidated Plan includes information on fair housing and developers are required to submit affIrmative marketing plans for their projects with more than 20 units. OBJECTIVE 9 Reduction and/or removal to the greatest extent possible of identifIed constraints to the development, maintenance, and improvement of housing within the planning area. Implementine Actions A. Expedite the Processing of Affordable Housing Projects B. Designate an Affordable Housing Ombudsman C. Establish specifIc procedures for evaluating requests for subsidies involving fees, land write downs, and other forms of City assistance. Page 50 of 103 September 2000 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /1-1 :L D. Encourage demonstration or experimental housing projects which reduce building costs and increase affordability E. Consider the impacts to affordable housing which may result from rezonings involved with the General Plan/Zoning Consistency Study. F. Continue to encourage the use of flexible development standards through the Planned Community (PC) Zone and Precise Plan (P) Modifying District, where such are clearly identified with increased availability of affordable housing. G. Designate staff and develop resources to assist developers in availing themselves of alternative and supplemental financial assistance. Responsible Agencies: Community Development Department and Planning and Building Department Quantified Objectives: N/A Cumulative Results: Chula Vista departments work cooperatively to expedite project review and approval. The City does not typically experience complaints about project processing delays. The City's Housing Division staff work cooperatively with those developers providing affordable housing within the community. They review all affordable housing project proposals and provide technical assistance when required. Should financial assistance be requested, the Coordinator reviews such requests and presents recommendations to the City Council and/or Agency. Housing Division staff serves as City liaison for affordable housing projects and coordinates with other City departments to resolve any issues that may arise. OBJECTIVE 10 To encourage the development of new housing, and the retrofitting of existing housing, with features to address environmental issues such as energy and water conservation and recycling. Implementing Actions A. Encourage energy and water conservation features and recycling storage areas in new housing in conjunction with the City's existing policy for the "Conservation of Energy and Water" within the City ofChula Vista. B. Continue to encourage the weatherization programs for low-income households currently sponsored by the MAAC project. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-7~ Page 51 of 103 September 2QQQ C. Continue to require the installation of dual-piping systems in new projects to accommodate the use of reclaimed water for landscaping and other applications as feasible. D. Continue to require the submission of a "water management plan" and "air quality improvement plan" for large development projects at the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan stage or similar level of review. E. Title 24 Compliance Review - The Planning and Building Department will continue to perform residential Title 24 energy analysis as part of building plan check procedures. Responsible Agency: Planning and Building Department, and Community Development Department Quantified Objectives: N/A Cumulative Results: A consultant is currently employed by the City to develop a Water Conservation Plan. The City has also received an EPA Grant for $80,000 to create a program to assist and promote energy conservation as well as CO2 reduction. Another consultant is exploring the feasibility of greywater recycling within homes for use in yards. OBJECTIVE 11 To fully address specific housing issues as they affect our community and to enforce applicable laws and ordinances. Implementin2 Actions A. The City will Encourage a Balance of Housing to Jobs B. Investigate the Need or Appropriateness of a Housing Linkage Fee C. Protect Coastal Zone Housing - Implement the Housing Demolition Rules and the Ten Percent Affordable Housing Requirement D. Provide Relocation Assistance as Required by Law Responsible Agencies: Community Development Department and Planning and Building Department Quantified Objectives: N/A Page 52 of 103 September 2ggg /9- 7c/ HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 Cumulative Results: As demonstrated in the section on needs, the City has substantial land zoned for employment growth and works with private developers to integrate employment opportunities within Master Planned Communities. The City's Affordable Housing Program has effectively integrated low and moderate income homes into newly developing areas. From 1991-1999, no homes within the coastal zone were demolished and therefore, there were no replacement requirements. OBJECTIVE 12 To provide and maintain adequate public improvements, facilities, and services to support residential growth in a manner consistent with the Growth Management Element and Program. Implementine: Actions A. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - The City will continue to implement the on-going CIP program. B. Implement the 20-year Neighborhood Revitalization Program C. Continue to Require Public Facilities Financing Plans for All Master Planned Communities and Other Facility Financing Methods D. Continue Maintenance of Public Improvements and Facilities Responsible Agencies: Engineering and Public Works Department, Planning and Building Department, and Community Development Department Quantified Objectives: N/A Cumulative Results: The City continued to update and implement its Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The vast majority of the funds must be used on specific kinds of improvements. For example, Transnet or Gas Tax Funds must go to specified types of transportation improvements. The City's CIP also includes the expenditure of development impact fees generated in conjunction with the public facilities financing plans. To date, the CIP expenditures have effectively enabled the City to invest in the infrastructure needed to support housing growth. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-7~ Page 53 of 103 September ZOllO Evaluation ofProj!ress Towards Meetinj! Coastal Zone Requirement Section 65588 of the California Government Code requires that, in housing element updates, coastal jurisdictions document the number of low- and moderate-income units converted or demolished, and the number of replacement units provided. Section 65588 also requires that revisions of the housing element must include, for the coastal zone: A. Number of new units approved for construction after January 1, 1982. B. Number of units for low- and moderate-income households required to be provided either within the coastal zone or within three miles of it. C. Number of units occupied by low- and moderate-income households and authorized to be demolished or converted since January 1, 1982. D. Number of units for low- and moderate-income households required either within the coastal zone or within three miles in order to replace those being demolished or converted. The coastal zone includes a portion of the Montgomery area that was annexed into the City in 1985. Information is not available for units either demolished or constructed in this area prior to 1985. The following information was obtained from City records: 1982-1999 A. New construction: 0 new units B. New low- and moderate-income housing: 0 approved C. Demolished/converted low- and moderate-income housing: 5 D. Replacement low/moderate-income housing: 40 Exhibit 2 shows the Coastal Zone in Chula Vista. Page 54 of 103 September 2000 ,;11- 7'- HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 EXHIBIT 2 [-"-'lL.~0 . .f"\ 'l..-"L . i '""-) ...... ~\0' _____~~\FUTURE SR,125 \ ~ j '/'" ~./" '\ /'''"\, \-\.) , r~ ,.l~, ~ /' ... <, ~'lt. ,,' "-1/ ;-<~. I ! I' il \'>.. ~ .' .... _..- \ '( /\ :iL,~. I '\(\'1-\,\,-.,/, ~.'~.~5\< :.,1 ....i::1~-- '. ;' '\ \ . ~"'\€'\" . "' \. f{'\ !,j \ \ \~..\ -1 i'l (J ~::I ,: " . __i;f-\--....~~\-" \,- ~/ ~>-f/ .v:& ( / ". i.... /\ ..# ......., i;-q . ; ~ ", ...__~ ~_ ~.".-~ _ _ 0; - , : .d1i ,,-\--,/,.\ --r#~\"""~--" :-1 /~ /I /' -- -'. - '\.' 1.-. I.,! ./ o o 5~ f ~ a ..... ~ Z '"' ~ ill ~~ ~ ~I~~~! I u~ g :s ~ c.. S " w z o N ...J ~ t/) <( o u HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 11-77 Page 55 of 103 September 2Q()() This page is intentionally blank. Page 56 of 103 September 299g A- 71' HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 Evaluation ofPro2ress Towards Self-Certification Requirements State Legislation (AB 1715) creates the opportunity for jurisdictions within the San Diego region to self-certify their updated Housing Element. The specific criteria listed below must be met in order to self-certify the Housing Element in 1999. Information documenting how the City of Chula Vista complied with each criterion is also included. The Housing Element self-certification criteria as set forth in AB 1715 (Section 65585.1 of the Government Code) are: Criterion I: The jurisdiction's adopted Housing Element or amendment substantially complies with the provisions of this article, including addressing the needs of all income levels. Chula Vista contracted with MacLeod Consulting Services who worked closely with City staff to update the City's Housing Element. This process will be complete when the Chula Vista City Council adopts the 1999-2004 Housing Element and passes a resolution self-certifying this updated Housing Element. The draft Housing Element addresses the needs of all income levels. Criterion 2: For the third Housing Element revision pursuant to Section 65588, the jurisdiction met its fair share of the regional housing needs for the second Housing Element revision cycle, as determined by SANDAG. Chula Vista complied with this criterion by creating 1,796 qualifying housing opportunities, which far exceeds the assigned fair share goal of 1,058. Criterion 3: For subsequent housing element revisions, the jurisdiction has provided the maximum number of housing units/opportunities as determined pursuant to Section 65585.1(a) within the previous planning period. Chula Vista will attempt to self-certify its housing element due in 2004. To do this, the City will need to provide an additional 1,029 affordable housing opportunities as follows: 278 extremely low-income, 329 very low-income, and 422 low-income housing opportunities. Criterion 4: The City or County provides a statement regarding how its adopted Housing Element or amendment addresses the dispersion of lower-income housing within its jurisdiction, documenting that additional affordable housing opportunities will be developed in areas where concentrations of lower-income households do not exist, taking into account the availability of necessary public facilities and infrastructure. It is a policy of the City of Chula Vista to ensure that lower-income housing opportunities are dispersed throughout the City. This commitment is also accomplished through the Affordable Housing Program which requires five percent of the units in projects with more than 50 units to be affordable to low-income households and five percent to moderate-income households. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 1/-7'1 Page 57 of 103 September 21199 Criterion 5: No local government actions or policies prevent the development of the identified sites or accommodation of the jurisdiction's share of the total regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The 1999-2004 Housing Element specifically provides adequate sites, removes governmental constraints, and promotes equal housing opportunities. Page 58 of 103 Septemger Zggg A- io HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 IV. Housing Opportunities This section evaluates the potential residential development that could occur based on Chula Vista's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Availability of Suitable Sites Housing element law mandates that a city must show that it has adequate sites with required public services and facilities for a variety of housing types for all income levels. In this section, adequate sites will be discussed in terms of the City's Regional Share Goals for 1999-2004 as established by SANDAG. Regional Share Goals According to state law, a local jurisdiction's housing needs must include their share of the projected needs for housing in the region (regional share). The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) has identified Chula Vista's share ofregional housing needs for 1999- 2004. The figures are contained in the Regional Housing Needs Statement adopted in 1999. Each jurisdiction must identify the sites (capacity) to meet their share of the region's housing needs. The regional share identifies the need for new housing units for each jurisdiction and distributes the projected housing need to all income groups: very low, low, moderate, and above moderate. Table IV-I shows Chula Vista's regional share goal and the income distribution of the goal. Chula Vista accounts for nearly II percent of the region's projected housing needs or 10,401 units. TABLE IV-l REGIONAL SHARE -1999 - 2004 CHULA VISTA Ineom,e(]lltegory Housing GOllI Very Low Income (<50% Area Median Income) 1,889 Low Income (50-80% Area Median Income) 1,535 Moderate Income (80-120% Area Median Income) 2,388 Above Moderate Income 4,589 Total 10,401 Source: SANDAG Residential Land The master planned projects in Eastern Chula Vista (Exhibit 3) include capacity for 28,569 homes in a wide range of housing densities. This capacity is more than twice the regional share allocation to the City. Refer to Table IV-2. /l-e f Page 59 of 103 Septemaer 211110 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 TABLE IV-2 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION CAPACITY EASTERN CHULA VISTA MASTER PLANNED PROJECTS Low LowMed Med MtildHigh Higb. r 0-3 3-6 6--11 1148 18-27+ Totals ...... ...... dulac dulac dwac dWllc dwac Rancho Del Rey SPA I 17 17 SPA II 116 116 SPA III 246 154 400 EastLake Greens 41 66 129 1,031 1,267 Trails 88 487 274 294 1,143 Woods & Vistas 746 255 260 506 1,767 Otay Ranch (Otay Valley Parcel) SPA 1 (Villages 1, 1 West, & 5) The Otay Ranch Company 1,597 704 1,402 3,703 McMillan 539 940 1,479 The Otay Ranch Co. (1 West) 772 214 772 Village 2 1,133 586 1,719 Village 4 329 203 532 Village 6 990 1,242 2,232 Village 7 1,303 448 1,751 Village 8 1,021 436 1,457 Village 11 745 1,001 1,746 Village 12 (EVC) 2,500 2,500 Otay Ranch (proctor Valley Parcel) Birch Patrick Estates 123 123 San Miguel Ranch 157 673 435 129 1,394 Vista Mother Miguel 43 43 Sun bow II 720 241 444 214 1,619 Rolling Hills Ranch (Salt Creek) 675 1,045 529 2,249 Bonita Meadows 250 250 Bella Lago 290 290 Totals 2,832 11,105 3,031 6,251 5,350 28,569 Sources: General Development Plans and approved SPAs Major Projects Development Status Report, August 16, 1999 Page 60 ofl03 September 2999 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /I-8'~ ~ ~ ::r: o c: C/l ..... Z c;') tT1 I:'" tT1 ~ Z ..,) I .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0'1 .... o ..... .... o ~ ~ MASTER PLANNED PROJECTS Remaining Construction Capacltv ~\~ -.- . - - -.:... - --- 1 2 3 . 5 6 I 6 9 RaBeho Oel Reyl RaDch,aelRlvl! RanchlUelRevlll SURbowll Eastlaklll EastlakeBrllRs EasUlklTralls ElSlJaklVJstas ElsUakeWoods 10 IDA lOB n 12 13 14 15 CllY OF CHUlA VISfA PLANNING DEPARTMENT it.. ~~ DtayRancb [OtavVall8!lParcelJ OtayRancb lProctorVallevPucelJ ltavRanc. (Sin Ysldrl PareelJ ROlllngllllslaneh San MIII.I RaDch TelegrlDbCaavonEslllll Bonltl....d.ws ..IIIL1,1 t"l ~ .... = .... ..,) "" In Western Chula Vista there are only about 84 acres of vacant land with a capacity of519 units. Underutilized land has a capacity of another 1,097 units for a total of 1,616 units. Most of this capacity (1,109 potential units) is on land designated for high density development (18 to 27 du/acre). TABLE IV-3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION CAPACITY WESTERN CHULA VISTA VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND Low (0-3 du/ac) 15.19 37 8 45 Low Med (3-6 du/ac) 60.41 331 111 442 Medium (6-11 du/ac) 3.15 13 0 13 Medium High (11-18 du/ac) 0 0 7 7 High (18-27 du/ac) 5.14 138 971 1,109 Total 83.89 519 1,097 1,616 Density designations often have a relationship to the cost of housing or the feasibility of using gap financing to make units affordable. Table IV-4 correlates the City's capacity (Unit Potential), Density and Regional Share by income level. TABLE IV-4 REGIONAL SHARE AND UNIT POTENTIAL IN CHULA VISTA Units Neede Regi9/lal Sh 3,424 2,388 4,589 10,401 ropriate ity >=18 du/ac 11-18/du/ac Any Unit Potential 6,755 6,405 18,144 31,304 Very Low- and Low- Income Moderate-Income Above Moderate-Income Total Availability of Public Services and Facilities Chula Vista has adequate public services/facilities or has plans and financing mechanisms to assure their installation in time to accommodate the growth. Page 62 of 103 September 2999 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A - rei Opportunities for Energy Conservation The primary uses of energy in urban areas are for transportation lighting, water heating, and space heating/cooling. The high energy costs are an impetus to reduce or minimize the overall level of urban energy consumption. Title 24, Building Energy Standards for Residential Development, establishes energy budgets or maximum energy use levels. The standards of Title 24 supercede local regulations, and State requirements mandate Title 24 requirements though implementation by local jurisdictions. The City will continue strict enforcement of local and state energy regulations for new residential construction, and continue providing residents with information on energy efficiency. As previously described the City is also using consultant assistance to create a program to reduce energy consumption and achieve other conservation goals. Redevelopment Housin2 Obli2ations Legislative Framework State Redevelopment Law provides the mechanism whereby cities and counties within the State can, through adoption of an ordinance, establish a redevelopment agency. The agency's primary purpose is to provide the legal and financial mechanism necessary to address blighting conditions in the community through the formation of redevelopment project areas. State Redevelopment Law also requires the redevelopment agency to address housing issues for low- and moderate-income residents in the following ways: . Expend 20 percent of the tax increment revenue to increase and improve the supply of low- and moderate- income housing; . Replace low- and moderate-income housing which is destroyed as a result of a redevelopment project (replacement housing obligation); and . Ensure that a portion of all housing constructed or substantially rehabilitated in a redevelopment project area be affordable to low- and moderate-income housings (inciusionary housing obligation). Redevelopment in Chula Vista The Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency was activated in 1974 with the adoption of the Bayfront Redevelopment Area. Since its formation, the Agency has adopted five redevelopment plans in the City (as shown on Exhibit 4): . Bayfront (1974) . Town Centre I (1976) . Town Centre II (1978) HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-fir- Page 63 ofl03 September 2000 . Otay Valley Road (1983) . Southwest (1990) Redevelopment Housing Set-Aside Pursuant to State Law, the Redevelopment Agency has established a Redevelopment Housing Set-Aside Fund using 20 percent of the tax increment revenue. As part of the Agency's efforts to meet its unmet housing needs, these funds have been and will continue to be used to create affordable housing units. According to the Five-Year Redevelopment Implementation Plan for 2000-2005, the Agency estimates the following yearly tax increment to be deposited by the Agency by project area. TABLE IV-5 LOW/MODERATE-HOUSING FUNDS AVAILABLE SEPTEMBER 1999 Low.,j}nd 1999- 2001- 2002- 2003- M9t1~lCil'ttBmClJlIle 2000 2000..2001 2002 2003 2004 TOTAL :""":i:Q"9'9~I~g,'ilI1iiD.ll Starting Balance of $4,942,300 Total Annual Deposits (20% TI deposits by project area) BFrrCI 589,058 612,246 636,393 661,018 686,151 3,184,866 OTVR 232,339 239,309 246,488 253,883 261,499 1,233,518 TCI 211,453 217,797 224,331 231,061 237,992 1,122,634 SW 173,623 178,832 184,197 189,723 195,415 921,790 Interest & Other 326,000 328,760 331,548 334,365 337,209 1,657,882 Income Total Revenue 1,532,473 1,576,943 1,622,957 1,670,050 1,718,266 8,120,690 The total revenues to be deposited over the five-year period are estimated at $8,120,700. The beginning balance in the low- and moderate-income housing fund as of July 1, 1999 was approximately $4,942,300. Therefore, the estimated amount of tax increment housing set-aside projected to be available over the five-year period for the development and assistance of affordable housing projects is $13,063,000. Based on existing programs and pro-forma cost projections for new and rehabilitated units, up to 725 additional units, could be created through the leveraging of Redevelopment Housing Set- Aside Funds over the five-year period. Funds are allocated among newly constructed and rehabilitated units as follows: 700 new-housing units; and 25 substantially rehabilitated housing units. The Agency anticipates assisting 60 low-income homeowners each year with the minor rehabilitation of their homes through the Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP). Page 64 of 103 SepteJ.B-ller 2ggg HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-~b TABLE IV-6 ANNUAL HOUSING UNIT PRODUCTION REDEVELOPMENT SET-ASIDE FUNDS Housing Units to be developed Housing Units to be substantially rehabilitated Total housing units to be price restricted (acquisition of price restriction covenants for existing housing) Housing Units to be otherwise assisted by the Agency (non-restricted) '2004 Five Year Total 140 140 140 140 140 700 5 5 5 5 5 25 145 145 145 145 145 725 60 60 60 60 60 300 Replacement Requirements Section 33413(a) of the California Health and Safety Code requires that whenever units housing persons of low- and moderate-incomes are destroyed or removed from the low- and moderate- income housing market as part of a redevelopment project, the Agency shall within four years of the destruction or removal of such housing, rehabilitate, develop or construct for rental or sale, to persons of low- and moderate-income, an equal number of replacement units. At least 75 percent of these replacement units must be made available at an affordable housing cost for the same income level as the household that was displaced. Since the inception of redevelopment in Chula Vista, the Agency has incurred an obligation to replace 157 units that were demolished as a result of redevelopment activities in the various project areas. To fulfill this obligation, the Agency provided financial assistance to several residential developments throughout the City, resulting in the construction of 258 very low- and low-income housing units. Of the 258 units, 192 are for very low-income households and 66 are for low-income households. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-f7 Page 65 of 103 September 2000 ;;? aq III 0\ 0\ o .... .... o to> ~ I ~ ~ :I: o e CIl .... Z C) trl I:"" trl ~ ~ I .... \CI \CI \CI ~ o ~ t"l ~ .... = .... .., "" r~... ~l r~j j ,,,-.~ SAN DIEGO BAY \ ''''>:. /^' .--- "- , " , I / " ,,/' ..<// )/'. ~ # c: /' ill > , '- en ;u iii ~ ~V?- -11-: -:::. - --- LEGEND Em BAYFRONT [=:J TOWN CENTER I _ TOWN CENTER 11 _ SOUTHWEST "-,":,,;--1 OTAY VALLEY ROAD mY OF CHUlA VISfA PLANNING DEPARTMENT REDEVELOPMENT SITES h:\JII..mg\bectDr\lruhlts\AlOlH.cDR Affordable Housing Production (Inclusionary) Requirements Section 33413(b) (1) and (2) of the California Health and Safety Code imposes inclusionary requirements for affordable housing for all residential development in Redevelopment Project Areas, whether developed by the Agency or by private entities. For the project areas adopted on or after January 1, 1976, the following restrictions apply: . At least 30 percent of all new or substantially rehabilitated housing units developed by a redevelopment agency must be affordable to persons of low- and moderate-income. Not less than 50 percent of those units (15 percent of the total) must be available to very low- mcome persons. . For units developed by other public or private entities, at least 15 percent of the units must be affordable to low- and moderate-income persons; not less than 40 percent of these units must be made affordable to very low-income persons. . Affordable units created outside of the project areas may be counted toward this requirement on a two for one basis. Agency Assisted/Price Restricted Housing for the Next Five Years Based on low/moderate-housing funds available, it is anticipated that 700 units will be developed or substantially rehabilitated over the next five years. The following projects are anticipated to be developed within the next five years. The Agency will consider providing financial assistance to these projects. Of these units, it is estimated that 117 units will be developed/rehabilitated within the redevelopment project areas. Trolley Trestle - The Agency approved financial assistance in FY 1998-99 to a local non-profit organization for the construction of this project. Trolley Trestle, located within the Southwest Redevelopment area, is an II-unit housing development for those extremely low-income youths completing the San Diego County Foster Care Program. It is anticipated that construction will be completed by December 2000. Villa Serena - The Agency provided assistance in FY 1998-99 to this 132-unit low-income senior housing development. It is anticipated that construction will be completed in Summer 2000. Rolling Hills Ranch - The developer has proposed construction of 32 low-income family units and 116 low-income senior units. EastLake Greens - The developer has proposed construction of 130 for sale townhomes for low- income homebuyers. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-Yf Page 67 of 103 September 2999 Gtay Ranch -The developer has an obligation to develop 10 percent of the units within this master planned community for both low-income and moderate-income households. At this point in time, the required number of affordable units is estimated to be 232 units. Pear Tree Apts - The Agency approved financial assistance in FY 1999-2000 to acquire and substantially rehabilitate this 119-unit apartment project. All units are proposed to be affordable to very low and low-income households. It is anticipated that construction will be completed by Spring 2001. Main Plaza - The Agency has approved a mixed-use development of 106 low-income affordable units with 15,000 square feet of commercial use. This project is located within the Southwest Redevelopment area. It is anticipated that the development of these projects within the next five years will create an additional surplus of low- and moderate-income units for the Agency. Page 68 of 103 September 2Qllll HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 ,A- 90 v. GOALS AND POLICIES This section of the Housing Element contains goals and policies the City will implement to address a number of important housing-related issues. The primary goal of the City is to ensure that decent, safe housing is available at an affordable cost. The priority remains the provision of housing for families, particularly large families, of all income levels. Table V-I is a summary listing of the objectives by Goals, Policies, and Programs: piJliCiesill.lldProg.'ams I Five YelltObjective Goall - Conserve Existing Affordable Housing Opportunities 1.1 Preservation of Assisted Housing At-Risk 41 low-income units of Converting to Market Rate 1.2 Condominium Conversions Monitor 1.3 Single Family and Mobilehome . 250 CHIP loans/grants to very low- and low- Rehabilitation income homeowners and mobilehome owners. . Minor repair and clean up of 500 homes and mobile homes. 1.4 Rehabilitate Deteriorating and Substandard 120 very low- and low-income rental units Rental Housing 1.5 Preservation of Mobilehome Park Living Case by Case Goal 2 - Maintain and Enhance the Quality of Residential Neighborhoods in Chula Vista 2.1 Reinvest III the City's Well-established . Target two residential neighborhoods for a Neighborhoods. clean up/fix up campaign as well as a program to promote community pride. . Repair/rehabilitate 25 homes through Christmas in October. Goal 3 - Ensure That an Adequate and Diverse Housing Supply Is Available to Meet the City's Existing and Future Needs. 3.1 Affordable Housing Program New construction of 590 units for low-income households, of which 130 will be for sale units as also referenced under Program 4.1, and 470 units for moderate-income 3.2 Protection of Coastal Housing Case by Case 3.3 Provide Incentives for Low Income . Adoption of a density bonus ordinance. Housing Construction . Evaluate on a case by case basis acquisition of property and land write downs. . Pursue affordable housing funding sources. . 10 low income density bonus units Table V-I Housing Objectives by Goals, Policies, and Programs Summary HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /1- 91 Page 69 of 103 Sel'temeer 2000 Policies.alldPfogrlll11s FiveYearObjec:tive 3.4 Pursue Housing Opportunities for Lower- . Assist 350 low-income persons through a Income Households shared housing program. . Work with the County Housing Authority to compete for rental assistance programs. Work with social . , providers to . servIces identifY lower-income elderly residents and provide housing assistance. . Adopt a second dwelling unit ordinance. Goal 4 - Increase Home Ownership Opportunities for Low- and Moderate-Income Households 4.1 Encourage the Construction of a Variety of Case by Case Housing Types 4.2 Help Low Income Households Purchase A . Assist 130 first-time homebuyers. Home . Provide 25 Mortgage Credit Certificates to low- and moderate-income households. Goal 5 - Enable Homeless Individuals and Families to Find Permanent Housing 5.1 Participate in Regional Efforts to Address Continue to participate in regional efforts to Homeless Needs address needs of the homeless, including the Regional Task Force for the Homeless, local FEMA Board, Regional Continuum of Care Council, and County of San Diego HotellMotel Voucher Program. 5.2 Facilitate Local Facilities that Respond to . Provide technical assistance and consider Homeless Needs financial assistance to organizations seeking to provide or expand facilities and services within Chula Vista. . 10 transitional housing units Goal 6 - Encourage Energy and Waste Conservation as an Integral Part of Homes 6.1 Institute Conservation as Part of New On-going Construction 6.2 Promote Conservation in Existing Homes Change CHIP Guidelines Goal 7 - Promote Equal Opportunity for All Residents to Reside in Housing of Their Choice 7.1 Fair Housing Practices Fair housing assistance to 150 persons Goal 8 - Reduction and/or Removal to the Greatest Extent Possible of Identified Constraints to the Development, Maintenance, and Improvement of Housing. 8.1 Streamline Development Processing Monitor development processing for streamlining opportunities. Page 70 of 103 September 29gg HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-1L. Housing Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Programs Goall - Conserve Existing Affordable Housing Opportunities 1.1 Preservation of Assisted Housing at Risk of Converting to Market Rate Five Year Objective: 41 units of at-risk low-income housing Funding Source: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME, Redevelopment Low/Moderate-Housing Funds, and private sector programs Target Years: 2000 1.1.1 Preservation of Conversion Of Density Bonus Units The Community Development department shall work with the property owner of the Meadows and Eucalyptus Parkview projects to ensure the continued affordability of the 32 and nine low-income units respectively. As identified previously in the Needs Assessment-At Risk Units, the affordability restrictions for the Meadows are scheduled to expire in the year 2000. This is the only project in Chula Vista at risk of converting to market-rate housing during 1999-2004. 1.1.2 Tenant Education of Rights and Conversion Procedures The California Legislature passed AB 1701 in 1998, requiring property owners give a nine-month notice of their intent to opt out of low-income housing use restrictions. The Community Development department shall work with tenants of at-risk units regarding tenant rights, conversion procedures, and Section 8 availability/priority. 1.2 Condominium Conversions Five Year Objective: On-going MonitoringlRegulation Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, Redevelopment Low/Moderate-Housing Funds, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 1.2.1 Regulation of Condominium or Stock Cooperative Conversions The Planning and Building department shall continue to regulate residential condominium and stock cooperative conversions as specified in the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 15, Chapter 15.56 in order to protect existing tenants and promote the orderly growth and amenity ofChula Vista. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A- 93 Page 71 of 103 Sq'Jtemeer 2(J(Jg 1.3 Single-family and Mobilehome Rehabilitation, with Priority for Those Homeowners of Very Low- Income, Special Needs and/or Senior Households. Five Year Objective: 250 CHIP loans/grants to low-income homeowners and mobilehome owners. Minor repair and clean-up of 500 homes and mobilehomes. Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, Redevelopment LowlModerate-Housing Funds, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 1.3.1 Rehabilitation Assistance The Community Development department shall provide rehabilitation assistance, through loans and grants, to lower-income owner occupants to preserve and rehabilitate deteriorating homes. Assistance will be targeted to homeowners residing in blighted areas of the City and priority will be given to those single- family and mobilehome owners of very low-income, special needs and/or senior households. The Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP) provides favorable loans to low-income owners and also provides grants of Ufl to $2,llOO for minor repairs. 1.3.2 Caring Neighbors Program This voluntary program, is utilized occasionally by Code Enforcement to perform minor rehabilitation work for elderly and disabled homeowners. This program will depend primarily on the availability of funding from CDBG funds, which is a competitive grant provided on an annual basis. 1.3.3 Home Modification and Repair - For Senior Citizens The Community Development department shall encourage elderly persons to seek home modification and repair programs that will allow elderly persons to remain in their home and help to prevent injuries. Weatherization Programs are available through the local Welfare or Energy Department (Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and the Weatherization Assistance Program). 1.3.4 Reverse Mortgage Program A Reverse Annuity Mortgage Program, available through private lending institutions, can help elderly homeowners gain access to their home equity. Under this program, the Federal government guarantees the loans to senior citizen homeowners which allows them to draw down a monthly stipend. Page 72 of 103 September 2ggg 1/.. 9'1 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 1.4 Rehabilitate Deteriorating and Substandard Rental Housing Five Year Objective: 25 very low-income and 95 low-income rental units Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, Redevelopment Low/Moderate-Housing Funds, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 1.4.1 Rental Housing Acquisition and Rehabilitation The Community Development department shall make local funds available for both non-profit and for-profit developers to acquire rental housing that is substandard, deteriorating, or in danger of being demolished. A minimum of twenty percent of the units, once rehabilitated, will be set-aside for very low- and low-income households at affordable rentsl3 for a minimum of 55 years, unless otherwise dictated by a State or Federal Law. 1.4.2 Housing Inspection The Planning and Building department shall continue to employ Code Enforcement staff to systematically inspect a1l-rental housing complexes of three or more units and report violations of current Health and Safety Codes. Where necessary work is fairly extensive, referrals to the City's Community Development Housing Division are made. 1.5 Preservation ofMobilehome Park Living Five Year Objective: Case by case Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, Redevelopment Low/Moderate-Housing Funds, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 "In such instances that affordahle rents are not defmed hy the applicahle laws or regulations, affordable rents (including a utility allowance) for low income households shall not exceed the lesser of 1) 30 percent of60 percent of the Area Median Income as published from time to time hy the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), adjusted for household size; or 2) 10 percent below market rents for comparable units within the project or surrounding properties. For very low income households, affordable rents (including a utility allowance) shall not exceed 30 percent of 50 percent of the Area Median Income as published from time to time by the U.S. Department ofHUD, adjusted for household size; or 2) 10 percent below market rents for comparable units within the project or surrounding properties HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 ,A-c;~ Page 73 of 103 September 2000 1.5.1 Community Housing Improvement Program The Community Development department shall continue to provide grants and/or loans to low-income mobilehome owners for the rehabilitation of their mobilehome through the Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP). 1.5.2 Mobilehome Space Rent Review Ordinance The Community Development department shall monitor and enforce the City's Mobilehome Space Rent Review Ordinance to protect the rights of mobilehome residents in preserving this affordable housing alternative. 1.5.3 Mobilehome Park Conversion Ordinance The Community Development department shall monitor and enforce the City's Mobilehomerrrailer Park Conversion Ordinance to protect the rights of mobilehome residents. 1.5.4 Resident Ownership of Mobilehome Parks The Community Development department shall assist mobilehome park residents to purchase their parks and convert to resident ownership by assisting with the application for other funding sources such as the State Mobilehome Assistance Program. Financial assistance provided by the City, Agency, State, or other funding sources may be limited to income eligible residents and require affordable housing costs. Goal 2 - Maintain and Enhance the Quality of Residential Neighborhoods in Chula Vista 2.1 Reinvest in the City's Well-established Neighborhoods Five Year Objective: Identify and target two residential neighborhoods for a clean- up/fix-up campaign and initiate a program to promote community pride. Repair/rehabilitate 25 homes through Christmas in October. Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, Redevelopment Low/Moderate-Housing Funds, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 2.1.1 Neighborhood Revitalization ana Neighborhood Improvemflnt Programs The Community Development department shall continue to implement a pro-active program of neighborhood inspections to improve conditions and appearance primarily through the "Neighborhood Revitalization Program" (NRP) ana "Neighborll.00a Imjlr0YflffiflHt Program" (NIP). Tll.flsfl This on-going programs target~ specific low- and moderate-income neighborhoods exhibiting high volumes of citizen complaints. Page 740fl03 September 2000 A.9' HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 The programs also prioritize needs for housing and infrastructure such as paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and drainage facilities, and to develop a schedule to coordinate provision of improvements with available resources and the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) schedule, and the Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP). The Community Development Housing Division will cooperate and assist locally based citizen groups to develop a program to improve conditions and appearance primarily through clean-up/fix-up campaigns and initiate a program to promote community pride for targeted neighborhoods. 2.1.2 Monitoring of Neighborhood Conditions The Planning and Building department shall continue to monitor neighborhood conditions for adherence to minimum standards of habitability, and appearance that lead to neighborhood deterioration by responding to service requests from concerned citizens. Goal 3 - Ensure that an Adequate and Diverse Housing Supply is Available to Meet the City's Existing and Future Needs. 3.1 Affordable Housing Program - A continuing program established in 1981. Five Year Objective: New construction of 590 units for lower-income households, of which 130 will be for sale units as also referenced under Program 4.1, and 470 units for moderate-income households. Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, Redevelopment Low/Moderate-Housing Funds, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 3.1.1 Balanced Communities The Community Development department shall continue to achieve a balanced residential community through integration of low-income housing throughout the City, and the adequate dispersal of such housing to preclude establishment of specific low-income enclaves. Assure that programs create housing for large families and accommodate the needs of seniors and disabled persons. 3.1.2 Affordable Housing Requirement - Administered by Community Development A minimum of ten percent of each residential development of 50 or more units must be restricted for occupancy by and affordable to low- and moderate-income households, with at least one half ofthose units (five percent of project total units) for low-income households. . HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-i:J7 Page 75 of 103 September Zggg In order to guarantee provision of these units, the City requires the developer to formulate, review with staff, and have adopted a specific program and agreement for the project delineating how and when the required affordable units will be provided, including but not limited to location of the affordable units, intended subsidies, incomelrent restrictions, tenure of affordability, schedule for production of the affordable units, and methods to verify compliance. Formulation of project-level programs and agreements is handled in a tiered fashion, starting at the General Development Plan (GDP) stage, or similar level of review, and progressing in specificity and detail through the planning process. . A final agreement is required prior to recordation of the final map or final project approval where land subdivision is not applicable. This requirement shall further be administered in accordance with the following: A) A "residential development" shall be considered as the entire residential development proposal as set forth in the development application, whether or not the subdivision of land is involved, or the units are part of a mixed-use project. In the case of master planned communities, the "residential development" shall be that development encompassed by the Specific Plan, Precise Plan, or General Development Plan/Sectional Planning Area Plan(s). B) The location of affordable housing developments for lower-income households shall take into consideration proximity to existing or proposed mass transportation routes, and the availability of community services and facilities such as shopping, medical, child care, recreation areas, and schools. C) Developers shall ensure the timely development of affordable housing for lower-income households. Affordable housing opportunities should be provided in the earliest development phase possible taking into consideration the availability of facilities, growth management standards, the general development plan, financing, and merchant builder involvement. D) A master planned community should satisfy its lower-income affordable housing obligation through the construction of affordable housing units within the master planned community itself. Should the City determine that Is orG@r tl3 r@&p13sG tl3 the unique conditions of ~ development provides an unreaonsable hardship for the new construction of units within the project, the City, at the sole discretion of the City Council, may consider methods other than actual developer-built in-project unit production as a means to achieving affordable housing opportunity. These alternative methods will be considered only when the City, at its Page 76 of 103 September 211119 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A- 91 discretion, has determined that such alternatives support specific Housing Element policies and goals, assists the City in meeting its slate housing r@(jyirements complying with the California Government Code as it relates to the planning for and provision of affordable housing and will not be significantly detrimental to achieving balanced residential communities, and will provide at a minimum the equivalent number of required affordable units and comparable rent and occupancy restrictions. Such determination shall be based on findings that the, new construction of units within the project would present an unreasonable hardship in light of such factors as, but not limited to, project size, site constraints, market competition, difficulty in integrating due to significant price and product disparity, developer capability, and financial subsidies available. Also to be considered are whether the alternative options offer preferred product type, affordability in excess of the requirements of the City's Affordable Housing Program, does not result in an undue concentration of housing for lower income households, location advantages such as proximity to jobs, schools, transportation and services, diminished impact on other existing developments, and capacity of development entity to deliver the project. Consideration of alternative methods shall be made according to the following order of priority: I) Land Set-Asides: Where unit construction by the developer presents an unreasonable hardship, the City may consider the donation of a building site and if necessary a financial contribution adequate to provide, at a minimum, the required units as satisfYing the developer's affordable housing obligation if it is determined that such contribution will be effectual in furthering the goals and policies of the Housing Element, is advantageous to the City in creating and preserving affordable housing to comply with the California Government Code as it relates to the planning for and provision of affordable housing~ its stal@ housing r@(jyfr@mellts, will not result in an undue concentration of affordable units for lower income households, and will not be significantly detrimental to the achieving a balance of housing opportunities for all economic groups provided within the residential development (required [mdings). The land and financial contribution, if necessary, must have a value no less than the net cost of providing the affordable units on-site and both sufficient in acreage and allowable density so as to make production of the required units feasible. Where the required affordable units are located within a master plan area, the first priority for the location of the site is within the same Sectional Planning Area, followed by other Sectional Planning Areas of the same General Development Plan. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /1- '11 Page 77 of 103 September 2()()9 If the developer can feasibly provide a land set-aside, the City will not approve any other alternative method of compliance with the Affordable Housing Program. 2) Off-site Location: Where provision of land within the project has been duly proven to present all unreasonable hardship, the City may consider developer construction, either individually or in partnership, of an affordable housing project at an off-site location if it is determined that such off-site project will meet those same findings listed above under land set-asides. The off-site project shall satisfy, at a minimum, the original requirements placed on the developer and provides a value no less than the net cost of providing the affordable units on-site. Alternatives to providing affordable housing within the project may include, but are not limited to, acquisition and rehabilitation of affordable units, conversion of existing market units to affordable units, construction of second dwelling units, construction of special needs housing projects or programs (shelters, transitional housing, etc.). Where the required affordable units are located within a master plan area, the first priority for the location of alternative affordable housing opportunities is within the same Sectional Planning Area, followed by other Sectional Planning Areas of the same General Development Plan. If the developer can feasibly build or provide the affordable units at an off-site location, the City will not approve any other alternative method of compliance with the Affordable Housing Program. 3) In-Lieu Contributions: Where construction, the provision of land, and off-site projects have been duly proven to present an unreasonable hardship, then the City, at the sole discretion of the City Council, may consider the acceptance of in-lieu contributions to be placed in a trust fund and used to provide assistance to other identified affordable housing production or contributions to a special needs housing project or program. The level of contribution shall be evaluated to ensure its adequacy in relation to achieving assistance opportunities commensurate to the level of the original project requirement. The City shall formulate and adopt, by Dtlctlmb€r March 2000, Implementation Guidelines for the Affordable Housing Program to maximize the production of affordable housing, ensure an adequately balanced community, and facilitate the evaluation of financial assistance. These guidelines will outline overall Program requirements including, but not limited to, location of the affordable units, intended subsidies, income/rent restrictions, tenure of affordability, schedule for production of the affordable units, and methods to verify compliance. The guidelines will also establish allowable development incentives and criteria for their Page 78 of 103 September 2000 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /i./tJo application, and define conditions under which alternative methods of compliance with the Program may be considered. E) Unit mix by bedroom count shall reflect the appropriate community need and shall be comparable to the unit mix by bedroom count of the market rate units in the residential development, but should provide a minimum of 20 percent of the units with three or more bedrooms to meet the needs of large families. 3.2 Protection of Coastal Housing Five Year Objective: Case by case Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, Redevelopment Low/Moderate- Housing Funds, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 3.2.1 Coastal Development Monitoring The Community Development department shall comply with State Law and local ordinances regarding the monitoring and reporting of affordable housing units and the new construction of replacement affordable housing within the Coastal Zone. 3.2.2 Replacement Housing Where conversion or demolition of housing units in the Coastal Zone occupied by low- or moderate-income households is proposed, such activity will be undertaken by the Community Development department in accordance with State Law and the City's adopted Coastal Plan. 3.3 Provide Incentives for Low Income Housing Construction Five Year Objective: Adoption of a density bonus ordinance. Construction of 10 low- income density bonus units. Evaluate waiving or modifying certain development standards. Evaluate on a case by case basis acquisition of property and land write downs. Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, Redevelopment LowlModerate-Housing Funds, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 ,4-10 l Page 79 of 103 September ZOOO 3.3.1 Density Bonus By D@Q@mo@r March 2000, the City, with direction from the Planning and Building department, shall adopt a density bonus ordinance consistent with State Law requirements. The density bonus ordinance is an appropriate incentive to produce lower-income affordable units and the City will encourage its use where appropriate. 3.3.2 Development Standards The Community Development department, with direction from the Planning and Building department, will evaluate on a case by case basis as requested by developers the possibility of waiving or modifYing of certain development standards, such as, but not limited to, parking standards, or the revision of certain Municipal Code provisions to encourage the development of low- and moderate- income housing. The City may provide a reduction in site development standards or a modification of zoning code or architectural design requirements, for those eligible affordable housing projects requesting such reductions or modifications consistent with Government Code Section 65925 (h). These recommendations will be reviewed based upon a goal to reduce costs associated with overly strict or outdated standards. Although standards may be modified, the City will ensure that the projects will retain aesthetic and design criteria acceptable to the City. 3.3.3 Land Assemblage and Write Downs The City can utilize beth--CDBG, HOME, and Redevelopment monies to write down the cost of land for the development of low- and moderate-income housing by private developers. As part of the land write down program, the Community Development department may also assist in acquiring and assembling property and subsidizing on-site and off-site improvements. 3.3.4 Pursue Affordable Housing Funding Sources The Community Development department shall examine ways to directly secure and/or leverage Federal or State fimding, or encourage other agencies to do the same. The intent is to actively monitor the fimds available through different and evolving housing programs to facilitate participation of eligible for-profit or non- profit corporations. 3.4 Pursue Housing Opportunities for Lower Income Households, with Attention to Those Who Have Special Needs Five Year Objective: Assist 350 very low- and low-income persons through the Shared Housing Program. Work with the County Housing Authority to compete for rental assistance programs. Work with social service providers to identifY lower- income elderly or disabled residents Page 80 of 103 Septemeer Zggg HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A - 10 2- and provide housing assistance. Adopt a second dwelling unit ordinance. Construction of 100 housing units within a mixed-use development. Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, Redevelopment Low/Moderate-Housing Funds, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 3.4.1 Section 8 Rental Assistance The Section 8 Rental Assistance Program extends rental subsidies to very low- income (50 percent of AMI) households who spend more than 30 percent of their income on rent, including mobilehome park space rents. Chula Vista contracts with the San Diego County Housing Authority to administer the Section 8 Rental Assistance CertificateNoucher Program. The Community Development department shall continue to participate in the San Diego County Housing Authority Section 8 Rental Assistance CertificateNoucher Program. At a minimum, the City will strive to maintain the current level of assistance to very low-income households. 3.4.2 Shared Housing The Community Development department will consider continuing to fund a Shared Housing program operated by th@ SmIth Col!Ilty COllllcil 011 .^.gillgsocial service agencies based in the South Bay which facilitates matches between households with extra room and individuals seeking low-cost housing. Most matches involve senior citizens or disabled citizens. 3.4.3 Second Dwelling Units Second dwelling units provide additional low-cost housing opportunities to residents, particularly for seniors and students. By D€c@mb@r March 2000, the City, with direction from the Planning and Building department, shall adopt an ordinance which permits second dwelling units under certain conditions. 3.4.4 Special Needs of the Elderly, Disabled, and Single-Parent Households The Community Development department shall encourage the development of housing suitable for the elderly and disabled persons as well as single-parent households to be in close proximity to public transportation and community - services. This includes easy accessibility to special services such as day care, elder care, medical services, or recreation. 11- (03 Page 81 of 103 September 2900 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 3.4.5 Mixed Use Developments The Planning and Building Department shall review existing zoning and land use policies to remove impediments, if appropriate, and encourage mixed-use developments. Goal 4 - Increase of Home Ownership Opportunities for Low- and Moderate-income Households 4.1 Encourage the Construction of a Variety of Housing Types Five Year Objective: Assist 130 low-income first-time buyers in fulfillment of the City's Affordable Housing Program. Provide 25 Mortgage Credit Certificates to low- and moderate-income households. Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, Redevelopment Low/Moderate-Housing Funds, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 4.1.1 Affordable Housing Program The Community Development department shall continue to work closely with developers to encourage that a portion of the low/moderate-income housing required under the City's Affordable Housing Program is built for home- ownership. 4.2 Assist Low-Income Households Purchase A Home 4.2.1 First-Time Homebuyer Programs Financial participation by the City, Redevelopment Agency, or Housing Authority in a first-time homebuyer program will target those families and individuals currently living and/or working in Chula Vista. The Community Development department shall explore setting aside a portion of its Redevelopment Low/Moderate Housing Funds or HOME Fund to assist low- and moderate-income families to purchase a home. Funds may be used for closing costs, down payment, and/or below-market interest rate. .^Jl payments would be dd€rr~d until transf~r of titl~ in th~ prop~rt)'. The City would expect repayment of the loans through its equity share participation to allow the City not only to recoup the loan but to build the fund for future program activity. If using Redevelopment Low/Moderate-Income Housing funds, assistance could be provided to potential homebuyers of Agency-assisted projects or for the purchase of homes within the Redevelopment area. A HOME-funded program would be Page 82 of 103 Septem"ber 2999 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 11-10 t./ available to provide assistance to low income homebuyers for the purchase of a home within Chula Vista. 4.2.2 Homebuyer Information The Community Development department shall continue to make information available to the public on the home buying process and home mortgage lending including Federal, State and local programs. 4.2.3 Homeowner Education and Counseling The Community Development department shall encourage developers, lenders, and social service organizations to provide educational programs and materials for homeowners and potential homeowners on home maintenance, improvement, and financial management. The purpose of the educational programs will be to help, especially first-time homeowners, prepare for the purchase of a home and to understand the importance of maintenance, equity and appreciation, and to budget properly to accomplish such and avoid losing their homes. 4.2.4 Mortgage Credit Certificate The City is a participant in a coalition consisting of the County of San Diego and many other cities in providing Mortgage Credit Certificates (MCC) to qualified first-time homebuyers. The coalition has hired a consultant to administer and implement the program on its behalf and the City contributes to the administration costs of the program. First-time homebuyers are referred by the Community Development department to the consultant. 4.2.5 HUD Homes The Community Development department shall assist non-profit organizations to acquire and rehabilitate homes offered for sale through the u.s. Department of HUD with the expectation that these homes will then be sold to low-income first- time homebuyers. 4.2.6 Single-Family Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds Single-Family Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds can be issued by the City (through the Community Development department), County, or non-profit organizations to provide mortgage loans to encourage developers to provide for- sale housing which is affordable to first-time lower-income homebuyers whose incomes do not exceed maximum Federal limits. Buyers must also intend to live in their homes as their principal residence. Mortgage loans offered under the bond program generally have lower interest rates than conventional loans. Loans are available for attached and detached single-family residences. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 ,A-IO~ Page 83 of 103 September 2999 4.2.7 Sweat-Equity Sweat-equity projects reduce the production or rehabilitation costs of housing as the homeowners provide some or all of the labor required to construct/rehabilitate the homes. The Community Development department shall explore financial assistance for a low-income sweat-equity project. GoalS - Enable Homeless Individuals and Families to Find Permanent Housing 5.1 Participate in Regional Efforts to Address Homeless Needs Five Year Objective: Continue to participate in regional efforts to address needs of the homeless, including the Regional Task Force for the Homeless, local FEMA Board, Regional Continuum of Care Council, and County of San Diego Hotel/Motel Voucher Program. Construction of 10 transitional housing units. Funding Source: CDBG, Redevelopment Low/Moderate-Housing Funds, FEMA, other federal programs, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 5.1.1 Support Existing Regional Services for the Homeless Chula Vista encourages the coordinated efforts to address homeless issues in the area through a continuum of care model. Two non-profit agencies in the South Bay Region (South Bay Community Services [SBCS] and MAAC Project) provide assistance to the homeless or near homeless population. Both SBCS and MAAC Project distribute shelter vouchers to needy families, which allows them to stay at designated local motels. Assistance is provided through the County of San Diego and FEMA. During the winter months, the Interfaith Shelter Network provides shelter for up to 12 people at local participating churches. SBCS also operates several transitional housing programs as described in Section 2 of this Housing Element. The Community Development department shall continue to encourage these efforts to provide case management services, emergency shelters, transitional housing, and will utilize CDBG funding, as appropriate, to aid in these efforts. 5.1.2 Participate in a Regional Approach to Address Homelessness The Community Development department shall continue to participate in the Regional Continuum of Care Council for San Diego County and the County of San Diego's application for funding through the Federal Supportive Housing Program for the development of new housing facilities for the homeless and the Page 84 of 103 Septemeer 2(j(jO HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 .A-/tJ' continuing funding of existing facilities. The City will continue its representation on the FEMA Board and the Regional Task Force on Homelessness. 5.2 Facilitate Local Facilities that Respond to Homeless Needs Five Year Objective: Provide technical assistance and consider financial assistance to organizations seeking to provide or expand facilities and services within Chula Vista. Funding Source: CDBG, Redevelopment Low/Moderate-Housing Funds, FEMA, other Federal programs, and private sector programs. Target Years: 1999-2004 5.2.1 Evaluate and Identify Facilities and Services The Community Development department shall evaluate support facilities and service needs of the homeless and the near homeless and identify appropriate agencies and resources. 5.2.2 Identify Non-profit Providers to Operate Emergency Shelter Programs Non-profit providers are hesitant to undertake emergency shelter and transitional housing programs because of the difficulty in securing adequate operational funds. In addition to room and board, most shelter programs provide some type of case management and other social services. Providers rely heavily on private donations and volunteers to fill funding gaps. The Community Development department can directly assist shelter providers with CDBG or Redevelopment Housing funds, and encourage them to apply for available Federal and State Funding (McKinney, E.S.P. etc). 5.2.3 Facilitate Shelters and Transitional Housing Programs The City will continue to make an effort to meet the needs of the homeless through the following: The Community Development department shall continue to consider providing financial and technical assistance to any organization or consortium of organizations seeking to establish transitional housing or shelter programs to serve the homeless population. The City will take other steps, as necessary, to facilitate these programs (such as amending zoning regulations to allow temporary church-sponsored shelters). The City's Zoning Ordinance currently allows for the development of homeless shelters or transitional housing subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Should the City receive an application or other request for siting HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 11-107 Page 85 of 103 September 2()99 of such a facility, the City's Planning and Building Department will work to expeditiously process the request through the identification of suitable sites, along with a set of performance criteria under which the CUP will be granted. Because site control is of paramount importance for securing State and Federal funding, the City will also consider providing assistance in the site selection and acquisition process. This may include loans, land dedications, or land cost write downs. 5.2.4 Group Homes for Six or Fewer Persons Pursuant to State Law, a residential facility for six or fewer persons may not be treated differently than family dwellings of the same type in the same zone. A residential facility is defined as any family home, group care facility, or similar facility for 24-hour non-medical care. A residential facility also includes a foster family home, small family home, social rehabilitation facility, community treatment facility, and transitional shelter care facility. Therefore, small group homes for six or fewer persons can be located in any of the City's residential districts by right. Goal 6 - Encourage Energy and Waste Conservation as an Integral Part of Homes 6.1 Institute Conservation as Part of New Construction Five Year Objective: On-going Funding Source: There will be no direct cost to the City for encouraging and promoting water and energy conservation and recycling. Target Years: 1999-2004 6.1.1 Implement Federal and State Conservation Laws The Planning and Building department shall require new developments to comply with applicable Federal, State, regional, and local policies and regulations regarding energy and water conservation and air quality improvement. 6.1.2 Resource Conservation - New Housing The Planning and Building department shall encourage energy and water conservation in materials, construction techniques, and features including recycling storage areas, in new housing in conjunction with programs such as "Greenstar" and SDG&E's Comfort Wise Program. Page 86 of 103 September 2(l(lg HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A- /oi 6.1.3 Dual Piping The Engineering department shall continue to require the installation of dual-piping systems in new subdivisions to accommodate the use of reclaimed water for landscaping and other applications as feasible. 6.1.4 Water and Air Quality The Planning and Building department shall continue to require the submission of a "water conservation plan" and "air quality improvement plan" or other substantive equivalent document for large development projects at the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan stage or similar level of review. 6.1.5 Title 24 Compliance Review The Planning and Building department shall continue to perform residential Title 24 energy analysis as part of building plan check procedures. 6.2 Promote Conservation in Existing Homes Five Year Objective: Change CHIP Guidelines Funding Source: There will be no direct cost to the City for encouraging and promoting water and energy conservation and recycling. Target Years: 1999-2004 6.2.1 Weatherization Programs The Community Development department shall continue to encourage weatherization programs for low-income households. 6.2.2 Rehabilitation Funds for Conservation Consider and promote energy conservation as an eligible activity for the City's residential rehabilitation programs administered by the Community Development department. Goal 7 - Promote Equal Opportunity for All Residents to Reside in Housing of Their Choice 7.1 Fair Housing Practices Five Year Objective: Respond and provide fair housing assistance to 150 persons Funding Source: CDBG HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 ,A- 10 , Page 87 of 103 September 2999 Target Years: 1999-2004 7.1.1 Affirmative Fair Marketing Plans All developers of housing projects which contain more than 20 dwelling units are required to prepare an "Affirmative Fair Marketing Plan," which should be designed to attract prospective homebuyers and/or tenants within the proposed market area, regardless of gender, age, race, national origin, or religion. 7.1.2 Fair Housing Services The Community Development department shall continue to provide fair housing services to Chula Vista residents and housing providers through the Fair Housing Council of San Diego. 7.1.3 Fair Housing Counseling and Education The Community Development department shall continue to provide fair housing counseling services and other referral activities which are designed to further the fair housing requirements of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968. The City currently contracts with a fair housing consultant to respond to any requests or complaints regarding fair housing practices within the City and to provide an educational program for both residents and housing providers. 7.1.4 Fair Housing Assessment The Community Development department shall conduct an assessment of impediments to fair housing choice every five years in conjunction with the preparation of the Five-year Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development. This assessment will include an analysis of the actual level of discrimination in rental housing, for sale housing, and lending and a review of the Community Reinvestment activity of local lenders. Additionally, the City is required to prepare an annual performance report of all housing and community development activities, including fair housing activities for the year. Goal 8 - Reduction and/or Removal to the Greatest Extent Possible of Identified Constraints to the Development, Maintenance, and Improvement of Housing. 8.1 Streamline Development Processing Five Year Objective: To monitor development process for streamlining opportunities and adhere to the priorities for financial assistance. Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, Redevelopment LowlModerate-Housing Funds, and private sector programs. Page 88 of 103 Septeml>er 2099 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A - /1 0 Target Years: 1999-2004 8.1.1 Development Fees The Planning and Building department shall continue to review development fees and facility financing to assure that they are as cost-effective as possible. The City will continue to consider subsidizing or deferring fees for affordable units on a case-by-case basis. 8.1.2 Expeditious Project Processing The Planning and Building department will continue to implement its project manager system that specifically assigns a planner to shepherd projects through the review process. 8.1.3 Evaluating Requests for Assistance The City shall consider assisting developers when necessary to enable residential projects to provide preferable product type or affordability in excess of the requirements of the City's Affordable Housing Program. Assistance will be offered to the extent that resources and programs are available and to the extent that the residential development assists the City in achieving its housing goals. The Community Development department shall establish specific procedures for evaluating requests for subsidies involving fees, land write downs, and other forms of City assistance. Evaluation of requests for assistance shall be based on, but not limited to, the effectiveness of the assistance in achieving a preferable product type and/or the affordability objectives of the Housing Element, the capability of the development team, the reasonableness of development costs and justification of subsidy needs, and the extent to which other resources are used to leverage the requested assistance. Priority for financial assistance would be for those projects that have both of the following characteristics: I) a substantial number of the project's units have three bedrooms or more; and 2) a substantial number of the units are affordable to very low-income households (50 percent of area median income or less). 8.1.4 Flexible Development Standards The Planning and Building department shall continue to encourage the use of flexible development standards through the Planned Community (PC) Zone and Precise Plan (P) Modifying District, where such are clearly identified with increased availability of affordable housing. ,A -III Page 89 of 103 September 2000 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 This paee left intentionally blank. Page 90 of 103 Septemller 2999 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /1-112. APPENDIX A HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /1-11.3 Page 91 of 103 September 2000 ~ r " " '<.. '"tl III ~ ~ o ..... .... o tIO HOUSING NEEDS PERFORMANCE REPORT July 1, 1991 to June 30,1999 TARGETED POPULATION TARGETED INCOME Jurisdiction Project Title Asst Elderly Small Large Special Extre. Low Very Low Low Low Inc. Moderate Form of Owners hip Funding Family Family Needs (<30%) (31-50%) (51-80%) Total (81-120'/0) Rent/Own Source(s) Chula Vista Silvercrest A 75 75 75 Rent 1,17 Dorothy 8t Manor A 22 22 22 Rent 14,15 Park Village Apts A 28 10 18 28 Rent 11,13,15, 28 Sanibelle A 36 36 0 72 Own 9 Madison Street A 2 I 3 3 Rent 3 Casa Nueva Vida 1 G 13 13 13 Rent 1,7,13, 15,31,34 Casa Nueva Vida 2 G 12 12 12 Rent 1,7,13, 15 Cabo A 13 13 39 Own 13 Mortgage Credit B I 98 99 89 Own 27 Certificate Section 8/Rental B 277 177 239 624 69 693 Rent 18 Certificates LStApts A 16 16 16 Rent 14,15,17 C.H.I.P E 213 213 Own 15 Shared Housing B 46 197 243 Rent I Mobilehome Rent Asst B 6 I I 5 Own 18 Prog Oxford Terrace D 121 II 82 32 18 132 Rent 37 ::z: o c::: {fJ ..... Z C'l rr1 I:'" rr1 ~ rr1 ~ , .... '" - '" '" I t-) o ~ :I: 0 c::: [Jl TARGETED POPULATION TARGETED INCOME .... Z G') Jurisdiction Project Title Asst Elderly Small Large Special Extre. Low Very Low Low Low Inc. Moderate Form of Ownership Funding 1'1 Family Family Needs (<30%) (31.50%) (51-80%) Total (81-120%) Rent/Own Source(s) t"'" 1'1 Palomar D 155 13 61 77 30 168 Rent 37 ~ 1'1 SBCS Transitional Hsg G 2 2 2 Rent 13 Z .., SBCS Transitional Hsg G 3 3 3 Rent 31,34 .... Cordova Village A 16 24 8 32 40 Rent 7,9,11, '-D '-D 15 '-D ~ Trolley Terrace A 4 14 18 18 Rent 3,7,11,15 0 0 Townhomes ""' SBCS-Dom Viol Hsg H 2 2 2 Rent 7,15 TOTAL 358 511 404 32 197 891 708 1796 205 ~ , "'- ...... ~ '"d III (Jq III '-D W o ...... .... o w This pae;e left intentionally blank. Page 94 of 103 September 2(}(}0 HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /1-11(. APPENDIX B HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A -117 Page 95 of 103 September 2llQ(} This page left intentionally blank. Page 96 of 103 September 2QQQ HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 ,A-/lf ~!~ --- -:-:- 01Y OF CHlJIA VlSfA SUMMARY OF MEETING WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPERS The City of Chula Vista has prepared its Draft Housing Element of the General Plan for the period beginning July I, 1999 to June 30, 2004. One of the more important policies identified within the City's Housing Element is the Affordable Housing Program (AHP), which requires that developments of 50 or more residential units must provide a minimum of 10 percent of these units as affordable to low and moderate income households. Staff has also begun work on the Implementation Guidelines for this Program. In an effort to solicit comments from those most affected by the City's Affordable Housing Program, the City met with developers of affordable housing. It was staff's intent to receive candid input from these developers regarding their perceptions and experiences from the "other side of the counter" in processing affordable housing projects, barriers to developing and processing such projects, including but not limited to City fees and exactions, processing time, etc., and the City's strengths and weaknesses in processing and development of affordable housing. The comments received and summarized below are generalized and do not necessarily reflect the comments of all developers nor do they represent the opinions of the City. The comments received were used to revise the constraints section of the Housing Element, to review the proposed programs and goals of the Element to ensure that the City is taking measures to aid in reducing or mitigating constraints and barriers and to encourage housing opportunities throughout the Citv. and to guide the development of the AHP Implementation Guidelines. It is the intent of the City to provide additional follow up to these meetings by reviewing the comments received. revie\Ving and evaluating City processes, and taking appropriate actions, if necessary . The following is a summary of the meetings held on June 23 and July 14,2000: Affordable Housinj( Proj(ram Strongly support the Affordable Housing Program and the new construction of affordable housing. The intent of the AHP is to provide a balance of housing opportunities for all economic groups throughout the City. Without a mandatory program to provide affordable housing units within the newly developing areas of the community, residential developers would not provide these affordable housing opportunities. New construction should be the first priority for the Affordable Housing Program. While acquisition and rehabilitation of residential units is needed for revitalization, it does not create new housing and will not meet the increasing demand for housing as the population grows. Rehabilitation activities do not meet the City's goals under the State requirement to provide its share of the projected need for new housing in the region (Regional Need). The City has other programs, outside of the AHP, to address the community's need for preservation and maintenance of the existing housing stock. The AHP must be clear and enforced. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 ~ -II 9 Page 97 of 103 Septemaer 2999 In Lieu Alternative Affordable housing developers support the City's position to require the new construction of affordable housing. In lieu fees can be effective in producing affordable housing, if the in-lieu fee is calculated to establish the correct gap of what a low-income household can afford to pay for housing and the actual costs of constructing a unit. Typically, however, the revenue generated from the payment of in-lieu fees is insufficient to build the required units that are needed to meet the growing need for housing and more specifically housing that is affordable. Rehabilitation of Rental Housing Where the City/Agency is providing financial assistance for the rehabilitation of units, the City/Agency should look at projects which provide deeper affordability levels than expected from new construction activities and housing for larger families. These rehabilitation projects are typically at rents below market. Typically, those existing units in need of rehabilitation on the Westside of the community are some of the more affordable but are in substandard condition. The older developments are also typically smaller size units of one or two bedrooms. The City's/Agency's participation should involve the conversion of these small units to larger three+ bedroom units. While rehabilitation of existing housing does not add to the overall increase of available housing, the City's participation in the acquisition and rehabilitation of existing housing will convert these market rate units into affordable housing. Additionally, the rehabilitation of this housing will improve the overall quality of life of the residents by ensuring affordable rents, providing new amenities, and renovating substandard housing. Balance of Affordable Housing Activities Encourage the City to continue to implement activities/programs that provide both new construction and rehabilitation opportunities. Encourage the provision of affordable housing opportunities and activities throughout the City. While the City needs to provide new housing opportunities to meet the population growth, the City should balance this policy with the need to preserve and maintain existing housing to so as to prevent the acceleration of neglected and blighting neighborhoods. Identification of Targeted Areas Developers spend their own predevelopment monies and time analyzing projects without the clear direction from the City that the area or project is one that would be supported by the City/Agency. To better focus time and resources, developers would like the City to identify areas for revitalization and affordable housing opportunities. Design Review Committee (DRC) The DRC makes landscape and architectural recommendations that maR)' some members of in the development community believe they are not qualified to make. These individuals believe that at times, R!:ecommendations and comments that are made are subjective. Developers would like to see, if possible, more objective comments. Page 98 of 103 September 2ggg HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A -12.l) DRC recommendations can add to the cost and processing time of projects. For affordable housing projects, additional design costs and delays in processing are critical. Limitations on budgets do not allow for additional costs to satisfY design considerations of the DRC. Affordable housing projects are time sensitive. The available sources of funding have critical deadlines that must be met and any delays jeopardize the project's ability to make these funding deadlines. Additional time added to the processing of projects also adds costs to project. The more time added to the timeline the more interest developers have to pay on their loans. It was noted that the City was currently reviewing the DRC process in an effort to streamline this process. As directed by the City Council, City staff is to make improvements to the existing process by having the DRC adopt procedural policies. meet with representatives of the development commrmity. Chamber of Commerce and the DRC to identify inconsistencies and concerns. and to amend tile Municipal Code regarding DRC membership and scope of responsibilities. Developers having more recently dealt with DRC have noted the changes taking place and were hopeful ofthe process. Plan Check Process The Planning and Building Department has contracted with an outside consultant for the plan check of large developments. The use of outside consultants adds another layer of bureaucracy. Developers currently have no point of contact with the consultant. Should developers have questions or need to find out the status of a project. they must contact the City first, the City contacts the consultant, the consultant contacts the City and then the City responds back to the developer. There is no relationship/face with the consultant as there is with City staff. Projllcts being sem to thll consultant havll belln referrlld to as "tllll blacklwlll". I t was noted that the use of consultants for industrial or large-scale developments was intended to assist in speeding up the plan check process. To assist affordable housing developers with the processing of their time sensitive projects. the City could provide a specific contact person in the Building Division. Additionally, developers commented that there appears to be a lack of commrmication among the development services divisions of Engineering, Plarming and Building. At times, it is their impression that staff members within the Building Department have little communication amongst themselves. A dll'fllloper recantlld a stor:( of going through the final plan chllck and no one could locate t-hll plans which rllsuJtllG in thll dllVlllopllr ha'fing to resubmit a 'Nholll nil'?' Silt of plans and starting thll process again. Developers would encourage coordination and commrmication between all development services divisions. Affordable housing projects are extremely time sensitive. Such time delays in the processing of affordable housing projects lead to higher costs for the project and jeopardize the available funding sources. The City should establish a fast track process for affordable housing projects. Affordable housing projects are time sensitive due to deadlines established for the funding sources. For example, tax credit projects are required to pull building permits within 90 days of being awarded the tax credits. HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /1-12..( Page 99 of 103 September 2999 Some affordable housing developers have been told that the City does implement a fast track process and an even faster process referred to as the "Red Path". Community Development staff and other developers are not aware of this fast track processing. Coordination Meetine;s With the processing of large affordable housing projects such as Teresina at Lomas Verdes, the developer found the "all hands" coordination meetings to be extremely helpful. These meetings, which involved Planning, Engineering, the City Manager's Office, Community Development and the development team, allowed for issues to be aired and resolved with all parties present. This allowed for a faster processing of the project and demonstrated to the development team the high level of commitment of City staff. . Fees Affordable housing projects are paying the same fees as market rate residential developments. However, affordable housing projects do not have the ability to pass these costs on to the project. These projects cannot generate the same revenue sources as market projects, such as rental income. Affordable housing developers strongly advocate the City to waive, reduce, or at a minimum, defer fees for affordable housing. Fees are one of the major governmental roadblocks to the production of affordable housing for low-income households. The City can provide low interest loans to affordable housing developers to assist with the development costs, in particular the costs of fees and permits. However, this assistance does not truly help to reduce the costs of developing affordable housing. Instead of using the City's financial assistance to make the housing more affordable, developers are having to use the funds to pay fees and permits. In essence, the City provides $1 million in financial assistance and then affordable housing developers turn right around and pay the $1 million back to the City for the payment of City fees. Many of the City's fees, such as sewer fees and assessment districts, are formula driven. As a result, fees are hard to pin down without having the most accurate information. Accurate estimates within the ballpark are needed. With the budget limitations of affordable housing projects, increases in costs due to wrong estimates of costs such as fees, means hard costs decisions. City staff needs to understand that these projects are not financed through conventional financing and therefore, these projects are much more sensitive to time delays and to increased costs. There is talk of the City of Los Angeles having a user-friendly system that allows developers to get a good estimate of fees. Reference their web site. Otay Water District Difficult to deal with for the processing of projects and payment of fees. School Districts Difficult to deal with for the processing of projects and payment of fees. Often times, developers are dealing with consultants and there is a lack of communication. Page 100 of 103 September 2(lgg HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A-I.2..2. Community Facilities Districts (CFDs)/Homeowner's Association (HOA) By the time affordable housing developers get involved with a proposal to build an affordable housing project, the property has already been annexed into a CFD and part of the HOA. Affordable housing developers would recommend that those sites for affordable housing projects not be included within a CFD or HOA. CFDs destroy the value of these projects. For those affordable housing projects financed with tax-exempt bonds, CFDs are problematic because they lower the net operating income to be generated from the project and therefore, lower the bond issuance. With the budget limitations and no ability to raise rents (income) for affordable housing projects, increases in costs due to CFDs and HOAs, means hard costs decisions and less financing available. 9% Tax Credit Financine Under the current regulations, affordable housing projects that are developed in response to inclusionary housing (balanced communities) policies are not able to compete effectively against those proposals addressing smart growth principals, housing for persons with AIDs or other special needs housing. Acquisition and rehabilitation projects within revitalization areas are better suited for tax credit financing. Tax Exempt Financine For those affordable housing projects developed in response to inclusionary housing (balanced communities) policies, tax exempt financing is the better financing option. As discussed earlier, CFDs are problematic. Unfortunately, in Chula Vista most of the new construction of affordable housing takes place in master planned communities, which are part of CFDs. At best, the lowest targeting of incomes that is financially feasible is 50 percent AMI. The City should not try to request any deeper affordability than the 50 percent AMI level. The experiences of developers working with the City for the issuance of tax-exempt bonds have been positive. The City has been reasonable in its issuer fee, reporting requirements and its regulatory agreements. The City has allowed the use of private placement letters. City/Aeency Loans When providing financial assistance to developers of affordable housing, the assistance is typically provided as a below market residual receipts loan. Typical terms: 6 percent simple interest and repayment from a fund equal to ninety (90%) percent of the "Residual Receipts". The 90:10 split does not work. Most cities in the region, the County and the State provide financial assistance at a 3 percent interest rate. Developers would recommend that the split of residual receipts be based upon the industry standard of 50:50 and an interest rate of 3 percent. Article XXXIV of the State Constitution Article XXXIV of the California Constitution (Article 34) requires that voter approval be obtained before any "state public body" develops, constructs or acquires a "low rent housing project". A redevelopment agency is a "state public body" for purposes of Article 34, and as a result, if a redevelopment agency participates in development of a "low rent housing project" and HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 A -/:1....3 Page 101 of 103 September 2000 that participation rises to the level of development, construction, or acquisition of the project by the agency, approval by the electorate pursuant to Article 34 is required for the project. On April 11, 1978 under Proposition C, the voters of Chula Vista authorized the development, construction, or acquisition of 400 units of "low rent housing" by the Agency. Of the 400 allowable credits, Chula Vista has utilized 293 units and has a balance of 107 units remaining. Analysis of the applicability of Article 34 to affordable housing projects has added time delays and costs associated with attorney fees. Developers would like the City to initiate a referendum to obtain more authority to develop affordable housing within the community. With the majority of residents needing affordable housing and the economic health of the City, this may be the most opportune time to gain voter approval of additional affordable housing. Attorneys Due to the complicated financing of affordable housing projects, issues of relocation, and Article XXXIV, many attorneys representing the investors, developers, and the City are involved. Developers have found the City's Attorneys to be very cautious at times in their approach to relocation and Article XXXIV. This has translated in to time delays to ensure all legal bases are covered and the subsequent increasing costs to the project for legal fees. While developers understand the Attorneys' need to protect the City's interest, it IS recommended that issues be identified as early as possible and some flexibility be given. General Comments Chula Vista is one of the most friendly and easiest cities to deal with for the processing of projects. Page 102 of 103 Septemher 2QQg A -I:LV HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 MEETING WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPERS ATTENDANCE June 23, 2000 July 14, 2000 Ana Baiz- Torres MAAC Project Ken Sauder, Executive Director Wakeland Housing and Community Development Chris Moxon, Community Development Director South Bay Community Services John Seymour Southern California Housing Development Corporation Wally Dieckmann, Chief Financial Officer Chelsea Investment Corporation Chip Murphy, Project Manager Chelsea Investment Corporation Ruben Islas Avalon Communities Staff Present: Jim Sandoval, Assistant Planning and Building Director Juan P. Arroyo, Housing Manager Leilani Hines, Community Development Specialist HOUSING ELEMENT -1999-2004 /l-/:JS" Page 103 of 103 September 2()OO EXHIBIT 4 REVISED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT NAME: 1999-2004 Draft Housing Element update PROJECT LOCATION: City ofChula Vista ASSESSORS PARCEL NO: City-wide PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista CASE NO: IS-00-08 DATE: April 18, 2000 A. Project Back!;round State law requires a housing element as a mandatory component of a jurisdiction's general plan, and requires that these elements be revised every 5 years. Periodic updates of the Housing Element ensure that local policies and programs are responsive to changing conditions and future housing needs. Housing Element Law requires the City to analyze resources available and to quantifY projected housing needs by income category. The City must demonstrate that there is available land with the appropriate densities to allow such development to occur and that it has programs in place or it will develop programs that will mitigate any regulatory measures serving as a constraint to such development. B. Proiect Description The City of Chula Vista has prepared an update to the 1991-1999 Housing Element. The draft 1999-2004 Housing Element (September 2000) addresses the needs of all income levels. It contains an analysis and update of housing and population data based on the most current conditions and sources of information. The revisions incorporate current population and housing projections based upon SANDAG's 2020 Preliminary Growth Forecast and the City's 1998 GMOC Growth Forecast. In accordance with State Housing Law, the draft 1999-2004 Housing Element contains the following: 1. An assessment of housing needs in Chula Vista, 2. An assessment of actual and potential constraints to the provision and maintenance of affordable housing, 3. An analysis of the City's accomplishments during the 19991-1999 housing element cycle, ,4 _/2..fo 4. An evaluation of potential residential development based on the current General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and 5. The formulation of goals and policies the City will implement to address a number of important housing related issues. The draft Housing Element contains the continuation of existing policies and programs to enable the City to meet future housing demands and its affordable housing obligation during the 1999-2004 Housing Element cycle. C. Revisions to the Proposed Negative Declaration The 1999-2004 Draft Housing Element was circulated for public review from November 6 to December 6. 1999. A Negative Declaration (IS-OO-OS) was prepared on May II. 2000 following the public review period. The Negative Declaration did not identify any significant environmental impacts associated with the adoption of the Draft Housing Element. After circulating the Negative Declaration for public review the City received additional comments on the Draft Housing Element from residential developers. Subsequently. the City met with residential developers in June and July 2000 to discuss these concerns. The City worked cooperatively with residential developers to address these concerns. which has resulted in several revisions to the 1999-2004 Draft Housing Element (dated February 2000). These revisions discussed below in more detail. provide more updated information. clarification. and/or guidance for meeting the housing goals ofthe City and therefore. do not result in any new significant environmental impacts. Specific low and moderate-income housing development proiects will be evaluated on a case by case basis for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Comments from residential developers centered on greater discussion of governmental and non-governmental constraints to residential development the quantified obiectives for the five year period. the City's Affordable Housing Program and greater specificity and accountability of the proposed goals. Revisions in response to residential developers' comments are summarized below: . New construction cost per square foot were updated from $40 to $63 per square foot to reflect those costs experienced by affordable housing developments currently constructed or in the process of being constructed in the City. . The discussion in the Constraints Fees and Exactions section was expanded to address the effect of fees on affordable housing and the need to provide assistance by either waiving. reducing. or at a minimum deferring fees for affordable housing proiects. . The section on Constraints. Federal and State Environmental Protection Regulation focused primarily on the added processing time and resulting 2 1'1-1-"7 higher costs associated with environmental regulations. This section was expanded to include a discussion of the impacts of the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) which prescribes the assembly and management oflarge-scale habitat preserves to protect sensitive biological resources from the potential adverse affects of development. This section addresses the effects ofthe MSCP on affordable housing prQjects in general in terms of added costs and time. It does not include a discussion of environmental impacts for any individual proiect. . The City's Quantified Obiectives for low income residential units from new construction. under the City's Affordable Housing Program was revised from 980 units to 596 units and 120 units were added for other new construction (density bonus. transitional housing. and mixed-use developments). The total reduction in the number of new low income residential units produced through the Affordable Housing Program do not affect the City's ability to meet the City's numeric housing goals established by SANDAG. The City will strive to produce a total of 2.171 affordable housing opportunities/units to lower income households. based upon the affordable housing goals for self certification as adopted by SANDAG and the resources available to the City for the upcoming planning period. D. Public Review In accordance with CEQA. Section 15105 (b). a public notice of availability for the previous Negative Declaration completed in May 2000 was filed in the Office of the County Clerk for public review from May 12 to June 12. 2000. No comments were received during the 30-day public review period. The Revised Negative Declaration was not recirculated for public review pursuant to CEQA. Section 15073.5 which requires a lead agency to recirculate a negative declaration when the document must be substantially revised after public notice of its availability has previously been given. The revisions to the previous Negative Declaration noted above in underlined text are not considered substantial revisions in accordance with the definition ofCEQA Section 15073.5. Recirculation of the Revised Negative Declaration is not required for the following reasons: 1. Revisions to the 1999-2004 Draft Housing Element did not result in the identification of any new. avoidable significant effects and no mitigation measures or proiect revisions were added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance: and 2. New information was added to the Negative Declaration which merely clarifies. amplifies. or makes insignificant modifications to the Negative Declaration. 3 ,A-/2.fi E. Compatibility with Zoning and Plans The I 999-2004 Housing Element Update is consistent with existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning designations. Adoption ofthe Housing Element Update will not require any General Plan Land Use or Zoning amendments to meet the City's housing obligation, goals and objectives. The revised Housing Element does not contain changes to other elements of the City's General Plan or Zoning Ordinance. The draft 1999-2004 Housing Element does not result in an increase or relocation of density nor does it modify the existing General Plan Land Use or Zoning designations. The revised Housing Element calls for the adoption of a density bonus program as an incentive to produce lower-income affordable units by July 2000. The City currently complies with State Law and may grant a maximum of25% net density bonus. The adoption of the future density bonus program will be subject to appropriate environmental review. F. Identification of Environmental Effects An Initial Study conducted by the City ofChula Vista (including an attached Environmental Checklist form) determined that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. This Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. I. Individuals and Organizations City of Chula Vista: Jim Sandoval, Planning and Building Department Benjamin Guerrero, Community Development Department Leilani Hines, Community Development Department Juan Arroyo, Community Development Department Edalia Olivo-Gomez, Planning and Building Department Elizabeth Hull, City Attorney's Office 2. Documents Draft 1999-2000 Housing Element of the General Plan, February 2000 Draft 1999-2000 Housing Element of the General Plan. May 2000 Draft 1999-2000 Housing Element of the General Plan. September 2000 Chula Vista General Plan (1989) Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code 4 /1-/4 " . . 3. Initial Study This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period for this Negative Declaration. The report reflects the independent judgement of the City ofChula Vista. Further information regarding the environmental review ofthis project is available from the Chula Vista Planning and Building Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910. Date: Marilyn R.F. Ponseggi Environment Review Coordinator Hlhome/planning/edaliaJIschecklist/housingelementnd.doc 5 /1-/.30 DEC 19 '00 17:14 FROU: T-033 P.Og/Og F-I?9 WAKELAND Housing and Development Corporation 707 Broadway, Suite 1230 Box 34, San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone (619) 235-2296 Facsimile (619) 235-5386 December 12, 2000 Honorable Mayor Shirley Horton City Council Members City of Chula Vista RE: Chula Vista Affordable Housing Program Dear Mayor Herren: This is to support the Chula Vista Affordable Housing Program as presented in the Chula Vista Housing Element. The Chula Vista Affordable Housing Program is important because it provides opportunity to all the citizens of Chula Vista to live in the new development areas. It also allows for families to choose where they wantto live regardless of their income. As you are aware, salaries for many professions are not enough for a family to qualify for a home or rental unit in the new development areas of Chula Vista. The Affordable Housing Program would allow for individuals and families to afford to live quality well maintained housing. An example is Cordova Village. Thank you for your support of this most important program. Sincerely, Kenneth L. Sander Executive Director p.2 O0 05: 02~ ~,/'~ NONPROFIT FEDERATION FOR HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 450 B Streel, Ste. 1010 · San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 239-6693 · fAX (619) 239-5523 Email: npfh@accessl net Mayor and Council Members City of Chula Vista Chula Vista, CA Dear Mayor and Council Members, On behalf of the Nonprofit Federation for Housing and Community Development I respectfully submit this letter of support for the proposed 1999-2004 City of Chula Vista Housing Element. The Nonprofit Federation is the only affordable housing industry membership organization in San Diego County. We currently have in excess of 150 members from both the for-profit and nonprofit housing development and management sectors. Our membership includes multiple community development corporations, the San Diego Builders Industry Association, the San Diego Apartment Association, corporate banks, title companies, as well as, many others in the housing industry. Our members are leaders in the construction, ownership and management of tens of thousands of affordable housing units throughout San Diego County. The Nonprofit Federation suppods the proposed 1999-2004 City of Chula Vista Housing Element in its current form. We do not recommend nor support any attempts that would alter the Housing Element and lessen the requirements that lead to the creation of affordable housing units. Chula Vista stands as a model community for affordable housing policy. We urge you to maintain that stature and reputation. Do not yield to those individuals who would have you believe that diluting the affordable housing production requirements in the Housing Element would actually increase their ability to create affordable housing opportunities? It simply is not true. Requirements are necessary to insure production. Execu-'~ctor \'\~~15 = ~ = ~ d ~ HOUSING ELEMENT OF GENERAL PLAN Work program to guide residential development and preservation consistent with the economic and social values of the community ~ = ~ d ~ State Requirements r Required Element of the Generai Plan . Needs Assessment . Constraints & Opportunities . Evaluation of Previous Efforts .. Five Year Housing Plan r Updated at least every five years . Last updated in 1991 . Legislative extensions to 1999 ~ Work Program r June 1999 - SANDAG adopted Regional Housing Needs Statement and Regional Share July 1999 Housing Advisory Commission and City Council . Regional Share Number It Preliminary goals and policies OctjNov 1999 - Community workshops 1 ~ ="" Work Program r Nov/Dec 1999 - Public Review & Comment . Comments resulted in additional revisions and discussions with interested parties r Nov 15, 2000 - Public Hearing . Housing Advisory Commission (HAC) . Planning Commission ~ '" ~ EVALUATION OF PROGRESS 1991-1999 ~ v-c;:== .--= = '" Evaluation of Performance Regional Share ~ ',000 DRtgloMISha,.., Go. OActuaJ p~rrOnDlUlCt - ',000 ',000 3,000 '000 ',000 v.ryl.bw 1.0.. M.d."," Abo", T."I 2 C&= -==::- c ~- TOTAL 'FAIR SHARE GOAL ;s'I,j'rp"i'l.lSioeflcit % 29% 12% 52% 6% 2% 1,796 1000 ~,~,~j,... 738; 69.8% ~ = V'~ ..-=- c Oxford Terrace Apts I1UDCapiwlGralll Palomar Family Apls HUD SUlion 8 Prajecl Ba.ed ~ Park Village !iUDP"b/ic!ia".i"8 3 ~'-'.-::':; More Affordable Housing Cordova Village Trolley Terrace Townhomes N(Jn.Pmfilfkv~I{)f"'r ~ Assessment r Made progress towards Regional Share . Fell short for low income . Seek ways to meet needs of low income r Exceeded Fair Share _10 out of 19'jurisdictions met Fair Share r Doing more than just new construction = ~=~ '" ~ = ~ NEEDS ASSESSMENT 1999-2004 4 ~ ~ ~ c~_~~, _ J:2wr =~ Regional Share 12,000 II Abo"" Mod~nt~ 10,000 OV~ryl.<Jw lJM<Hl~rat~ ',000 DC,. '000 <,000 2,000 ~lSha... %}?' ~ ~=~ ~/>~ ~ Housing Needs r 14% Large Families 12% Elderly Households r 23% of Housing over 50 Years of Age 10.4% Overcrowding . 65% renter occupied = ~..=:::...- c ~ = ~ GOALS AND POLICIES 1999-2004 1 ~ 1999-2004 Goals 1. Conserve Existing Affordable Housing 2. Maintain and Enhance Quality of Neighborhoods 3. Adequate and Diverse Housing . Balanced Communities-AHP 4. Homeownership Opportunities ~== '" ~ 1999-2004 Goals (Conrd) 5. Enable Homeiess Families and Individuals 6. Energy and Water Conservation 7. Equai Housing Choice 8. Reduction/Removal of Constraints ~ Quantified Objectives DESCRIPTION HOUSEHOLDS ASSISTED NO. % 936 43.1% 570 26.3% 350 16.1% 155 7.1% 10 0.5% 150 6.9% 2171 100.0% Rf.h.b&PreselVadonofExktln Hourill2&Nelehborfloods N..wCanstructlon Rental Asslmnce FIrst Time Homeb r HomelossAsslstan,e Fair HoosIn~ Aulsunce TOTAL 2 ~ Next Steps Recommendation * City Council adopt the City of Chula Vista Housing Element of the General Plan in compliance with Government Code Section 65585.1 for the 1999- 2004 Housing Element cycle and adopt a revised Negative Declaration (15-00-08). r Staff to develop work program . Affordable Housing Program Implementation Guidelines . Density Bonus Ordinance . First Time Homebuyer Programs = ~ The End Thank you for your attendance! 3 DEe 19 '00 11:14 FROM: T-099 P.02/02 F-I19 $/5 WAKELAND 707 Broadway, Suite 1230 Box 34, San Diego, CA 9210 I Telephone (619) 235-2296 Facsimile (619) 235-5386 Housing and DevelDpment Corporation December 12,2000 Honorable Mayor Shirley Horton City Council Members City ofChula Vista RE: Chula Vista Affordable Housing Program Dear Mayor Horton: This is to support the Chula Vista Affordable Housing Program as presented in the Chula Vista Housing Element. The Chuls Vista Affordable Housing Program is important because it provides opportunity to all the citizens of Chula Vista to live in the new development areas. It also allows for families to choose where they want to live regardless of their income. As you are aware, salaries for many professions are not enough fOT a family to qualify for a home or rental unit in the new development areas of Chula Vista. The Affordable Housing Program would allow for individuals and families to afford to live quality well maintained housing. An example is Cordova Village. Thank you for your support of this most important program. Sincerely, J~t')/L-. Kenneth L. Sauder Executive Director Dee 19 DO 05:02p Ti-.ervl #-/5 p.2 iii. i NONPROFIT FEDERATION. g . FOR HOUSING & . g COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 450 B Street, Ste. 1010 . San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 239-6693 . FAX (619) 239-5523 Email: npfh@access1.nel Mayor and Council Members City of Chula Vista Chula Vista, CA Dear Mayor and Council Members, On behalf of the Nonprofit Federation for Housing and Community Development I respectfully submit this letter of support for the proposed 1999-2004 City of Chula Vista Housing Element The Nonprofit Federation is the only affordable housing industry membership organization in San Diego County. We currently have in excess of 150 members from both the for-profit and nonprofit housing development and management sectors_ Our membership includes multiple community development corporations, the San Diego Builders Industry Association, the San Diego Apartment Association, corporate banks, title companies, as well as, many others in the housing industry. Our members are leaders in the construction, ownership and management of tens of thousands of affordable housing units throughout San Diego County_ The Nonprofit Federation supports the proposed 1999-2004 City of Chula Vista Housing Element in its current form. We do not recommend nor support any attempts that would alter the Housing Element and lessen the requirements that lead to the creation of affordable housing units_ Chula Vista stands as a model community for affordable housing policy_ We urge you to maintain that stature and reputation. Do not yield to those individuals who would have you believe that diluting the affordable housing production requirements in the Housing Element would actually increase their ability to create affordable housing opportunities? It simply is not true. Requirements are necessary to insure production. Sincer~__ --- ~.. ~ <-.,- ._.J "tw-'p .. _ ar-al- Execuli\re--O ctor .Tim? # (5 ANN T. FATHY, AICP ATTORNEY AT LAw 701 KETTNER BLVD. #198 SAN DIEGO, CA 921 01-5933 http://www.landuse-ca.com 619-238-0504 FAX: 619-238-1918 afathy@landuse-ca.com December 18, 2000 Mayor Shirley Horton and Council Members City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Subject: Housing Element 1999-2004 I have reviewed the December 2000 draft Housing Element of the General Plan 1999- 2004 and find that it does not comply with California housing element law. The fact that the City of Chula Vista qualifies to self-certify its Housing Element does not relieve the City of the legal requirement to comply with state housing element law (Government Code section 65580 et seq.). HOMELESS My particular concern has to do with the Housing Elemenfs failure to comply with the requirement to "to identify adequate sites which will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards and with public services and facilities needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including ... emergency shelters and transitional housing..." [Government Code section 65583(c)(1) language applicable to the 1999-2004 housing element cycle.] In 1997, the Fourth District Court of Appeal in ruling on the adequacy of the City of San Diego's Housing Element, provided additional guidance as to what a local government must do to comply with this requirement. [See Hoffmaster v. City of San Diego (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 1098.] The Court's opinion in Hoffmaster applies to all cities and counties in the state. I recommend that your City Attorney review the Hoffmaster opinion and advise your staff on what actions need to be taken to bring the City's Housing Element into compliance with state law. Briefly, this is what is required: . An analysis of any special housing needs... [Government Code Section 65583(a)(6)] 1 Comment: Page 17 of the Housing Element states: "Within Chula Vista the homeless population is estimated at 500 urban homeless and 100 homeless day laborers. " . A statement of the community's goals, quantified objectives, and policies relative to the maintenance, preservation, improvement, and development of housing. [Government Code Section 65583(b)(1)] Housing element law recognizes that the total housing needs identified may exceed available resources and a community's ability to satisfy this need. [Government Code Section 65583(b)(2)] The Court said "the housing element must contain quantitative analyses supporting the conclusion the local government and the community cannot meet the acknowledged need..." Comment: Pages 84-86 of the Housing Element address Goal 5: "Enable Homeless Individuals and Families to Find Permanent Housing." Under this Goal are two five-year objectives: "5.1 Participate in Regional Efforts to Address Homeless Needs" and "5.2 Facilitate Local Facilities that Respond to Homeless Needs." Despite estimating a Chula Vista homeless population of 600 persons, the only quantified objective is "Construction of 10 transitional housing units." [See 5. 1] There is no analysis supporting the implied conclusion that the City cannot meet more of the acknowledged need. . A program which sets forth a five-year schedule of actions... [Government Code Section 65583(c)] Comment: The City's five-year schedule of actions does not commit the City to identify adequate sites for transitional housing and emergency shelters within the City of Chula Vista. "5.1.1 Support Existing Regional Services for the Homeless" focuses on unspecified financial support, and mentions winter shelter programs (vouchers and the Interfaith Shelter Network) which do not meet the objectives of housing element law because they are not year-round. "5.1.2 Participate in a Regional Approach to Address Home/essness" is nothing more than a statement of approach. "5.2.1 Evaluate and Identify Facilities and Services" is another general statement. This work should have been done as part of the Housing Element preparation. "5.2.2 Identify Non-profit Providers to Operate Emergency Shelter Programs" means nothing without an identification of sites for emergency shelter and transitional housing. 2 "5.2.3 Facilitate Shelters and Transitional Housing Programs" contains no commitment to actually initiate any actions to facilitate the siting of emergency shelters and transitional housing, "5.2.4 Group Homes for Six or Fewer Persons:" See discussion below under Fair Housing Law. . Identify adequate sites... [Government Code Section 65583(c)(1)] The Court provided guidance on this requirement with the following statements: "To substantially comply with the identification of adequate sites requirement of subdivision (c}(1) here, City must provide an inventory of sites which will be made available through features of its program to meet its quantified housing objectives as to the homeless. An adequate site is one available for immediate development, which is located within reasonable access to public agencies and transportation services; will not require unusually high site development costs; has available public services and facilities; is consistent with the General Plan designation and site zoning so as to permit the development of, conversion to or use of, a shelter or transitional housing without undue regulatory requirements, fire regulations and design standards." "Under section 65583, subdivision(c)(1), City must identify adequate sites which will be made 'available' though its action plan; it does not require City to designate geographic zones where shelter for the homeless may be built as a matter of right without a CUP, or for that matter, without complying with the underlying zoning of the area. That is, the waiver of a CUP requirement is not the sine qua non of an adequate action program." "For identification to be meaningful, it must necessarily be specific. It must set forth sites which will be available to be developed, without restrictive zoning burdens which combined with the NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) factor ... become insurmountable or produce protracted delays and deterrent cost increases. Available sites should be officially designated and publicized, preferably in the . housing element, for this use. Finally, through its action program, City bears the responsibility to ensure the regulatory process actually encourages the development of emergency shelters and transitional housing." 3 Conclusion: The City's Housing Element 1999-2004 does not meet the requirements of state housing element law as it pertains to the needs of homeless individuals and families. FAIR HOUSING LAW The statement under "5.2.4 Group Homes for Six or Fewer Persons" reflects a provision of state law that was adopted prior to subsequent amendments to federal and state fair housing law providing protections to children ("familial status") and persons with disabilities. The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (FHAA) responded to testimony that persons with disabilities who may need or prefer to live in a "group home" (congregate living arrangement) were prevented from living in the housing of their choice in the community because of zoning restrictions on group homes. The FHAA prohibits such discrimination. Subsequently, state fair housing law was amended to be consistent with federal fair housing law. Government Code section 12955(1) states: [It shall be unlawful] To discriminate through public or private land use practices, decisions, and authorizations because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, marital status, disability, national origin, or ancestry. Discrimination includes, but is not limited to, restrictive covenants, zoning laws, denials of use permits, and other actions authorized under the Planning and Zoning Law (Title 7 (commencing with Section 65000)), that make housing opportunities unavailable. Under federal and state fair housing law, it is unlawful to use zoning practices to discriminate against group homes serving persons with disabilities, even when the home serves more than six persons. I would be happy to provide training to your staff on this issue. Sincerely, {L<-vrv 0. :f4 Ann T. Fathy, AICP cc: Cathy Creswell, HCD 4 P,4I-t-i bLtJ.-ul k.t J<nr. }<': lkenl1l:J)~.L1..t ~d-.. rJ..~.-Yh Jlo-IG Typical Fees, Assessments and Exactions for a Single Family Detached Home in Otay Ranch SPA One I I Fee Amount Water Water Connection Domestic Ins Water Meter :y." Water Capacity Fee SD County Water Authority Fee Otay Water District Annexation Fee Sub Total Water $ 60 $ 58 $2,905 $1,876 $1.045 $5,944 Sewer Sewer Capacity Fee Sewer Admin Fee Telegraph Canyon Basin Sub Total Sewer $2,200 $ 30 $ 217 $2,447 Other Facility Fees Sub Other Facility Fees $5,785 $ 820 $ 545 $ 124 $2,150 $ 508 $ 130 $4,375 - $ 917 $15,354 Transportation DIF SR-125 DIF Pedestrian Bridge Reserve Fund Public Facilities DIF Residential Construction Tax Traffic Signal Park Fee Drainage Fee Miscellaneous Fees Bond Premiums Inspection Fees Preserve Conveyance (est.) Sub Total Misc. Fees $ 125 $ 500 $1.000 $1,625 Buildin!! Permit Fee Building Permit Plumbing Permit Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit Plan Check Fees $1,186 $ 143 $ 41 $ 106 $ 668 Sub Total Building Permit Fees $2,144 Special Financin!! Districts (Present Value) Open Space Maintenance District-CFD 97-1 Preserve Maintenance District 97-2 Sweetwater Union H.S. District-CFD 6 Chula Vista School District-CFD 8 Sub Total Special Financing Districts $6,920 $ 445 $5,686 $4.618 $17669 GRAND TOTAL $45,183 C:\My DocumentslKimlFees.doc CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. /~> Meeting Date: 12/19/00 ITEM TITLE: REPORT- Regarding annexation of the approximately 743 acre San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Tentative Subdivision Map project area to the City of Chula Vista, and satisfaction' of the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission's (LAFCO) related conditions of annexation approval. Resolution Approving a Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Annexation Agreement for the San Miguel Ranch project among the City, County of San Diego, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Califomia Department of Fish and Game, and NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, concerning the conservation and biological mitigation program for implementation of the project,_and adopting Addendum IS-01-032 to the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area Plan and Tentative Map (FSEIR 97-02). Ordinance Establishing the San Miguel Ranch Fiscal Deficit Account, requiring NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, to deposit an initial $10,000.00 into said account prior to annexation, and requiring NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, prior to approval of any Final Subdivision Map for the project, to establish and fund a permanent mechanism to pay the City for financing the preparation of 15 annual fiscal reviews and deficit analyses for the San Miguel Ranch project, and for any fiscal deficits identified by the annual reviews and analyses. Resolution Approving the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization (Ref. No. RO99-42) involving the annexation of 742.94 acres to the City, the detachment of 742.94 acres from County Service Area No. 135 (San Diego Regional Communications), and the detachment of 1.03 acres from the Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District, subject to execution of the project's required MSCP Annexation Agreement. Resolution Approving an Indemnification Agreement between the City and NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, regarding the Annexation Agreement concerning the Conservation and Biological Mitigation Program for the Implementation of the San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area Plan and Tentative Tract Map. SUMITTED BY: Director of Planning and Building f/~, REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~t~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X ) Page 2, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 On October 19, 1999, the City Council approved the San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and related documents including a Public Facilities Financing Plan and Fiscal Impact Analysis (PFFP/FIA). Council subsequently approved a Tentative Subdivision Map on February 29, 2000, for the approximately 743 acre project area (see Attachment A- Locator). The project area is currently within the unincorporated County of San Diego, and requires annexation to the City prior to the approval of any Final Subdivision Maps or the issuance of any grading or other permits for the project. The project is also located within the boundaries of the adopted County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan, South County Segment. Council's actions on the SPA Plan, PFFP/FIA and the Tentative Subdivision Map contained conditions of approval to be satisfied prior to completion of annexation of the project area. More specifically, those conditions regard MSCP requirements for an annexation agreemem to be completed between the City, County, United States Fish and Wildlife Service CLISFWS), California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and the project applicant NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, and the need for the applicant to establish a mechanism satisfactory to the City to ensure mitigation of the project's forecasted annual fiscal deficit as identified in the PFFP/FIA. On April 3, 2000, the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) considered Trimark's annexation application, and approved the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization (Reft No. RO99-42) subject to two conditions; one regarding completion of the above noted MSCP Annexation Agreement, the other regarding the property owner establishing and funding a mitigating mechanism to the City's satisfaction regarding the above noted forecasted annual fiscal deficit. LAFCO's approval also designated the City as the conducting authority, authorized the City Council to conduct proceedings in compliance with the LAFCO resolution without notice and hearing, and directed that the City Council order the associated actions. Staff has since been working with the County, USFWS, CDFG and NNP-Trimark San Miguel LLC, to prepare the required MSCP Annexation Agreement, and is now ready to bring forward all items related to completing the project's annexation for Council consideration. A Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR-97~02) for the San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area Plan (SPA) and Tentative Map was previously certified by the City Council on October 19, 1999, along with attendant Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. FSEIR-97-02 included analysis of the biological impacts of the proposed San Miguel Ranch SPA and TM and mitigation requirements under the MSCP, and requirements of the PFFP/FIA and annexation. With regard to the proposed Fiscal Deficit Ordniance and the Resolution approving the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined, pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, that these actions are in substantial conformance with the project analyzed in FSEIR- 97-02, and no further action is necessary. The Indemnification Agreement is not considered a project under CEQA. --2 Page 3, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 With regard to the MSCP Annexation Agreement, based on an Initial Study, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the proposed MSCP Annexation Agreement for the San Miguel Ranch project would not result in any additional significant environmental effects other than those previously covered in FSEIR-97-02. Only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to make FSEIR 97-02 adequate under CEQA, therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, thc Environmental Review Coordinator has prepared Addendum IS-01-032 to FSEIR 97-02. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council: (1) Adopt the Resolution approving the MSCP Annexation Agreement pursuant to the terms and provisions set forth in the Resolution and Agreement and Addendum IS- 01-032 to FSEIR 97-02, and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City; (2) Approve and place on first reading the Ordinance establishing the San Miguel Ranch Fiscal Deficit account for financing the preparation of annual fiscal reviews and deficit analysis for the San Miguel Ranch project; (3) Adopt the Resolution approving the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization; and (4) Adopt the Resolution approving the indenmification agreement between the City and NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The Discussion is divided into four major sections which correspond to each of the three Resolutions, and the one Ordinance being recommended for adoption as follows: I. The San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement; II. Offsetting the Project's Forecasted Annual Fiscal Deficit; III. The San Miguel Ranch Reorganization; and IV. The Indemnification Agreement. I. THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH MSCP ANNEXATION AGREEMENT The San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement (Agreement) is an agreement among five Parties: the County of San Diego, the City of Chula Vista, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), and the San Miguel developer, NNP-Tdmark San Miguel, LLC. The Agreement addresses two purposes. First, the Agreement serves as an MSCP Annexation Agreement pursuant to requirements of both the County of San Diego and City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plans, and meets a condition of annexation required by the Local Agency Formation Commission. Second, the Agreement serves as a mechanism that will enable the legal "Take" of MSCP covered species and associated Page 4, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 habitats within San Mignel Ranch, prior to final federal and State approval of the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and issuance of federal and State Endangered Species Act permits to the City. Meeting County and City MSCP Requirements and LAFCO Condition of Annexation As noted earlier, LAFCO approved the annexation of San Miguel Ranch to the City on April 3, 2000, conditioned upon completion of an MSCP Annexation Agreement between the City, County, USFWS, CDFG and the property owner. The condition reads as follows: "Pursuant to requirements of the County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) regarding the annexation of land, the County, the City of Chula Vista, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department offish and Game and the property owner shall execute an agreement in accordance with the requirements of the MSCP, prior to recordation of the certificate of completion for the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization". The San Miguel Ranch property is currently located within the boundaries of the adopted County of San Diego MSCP Subarea Plan, South County Segment. The County of San Diego MSCP Subarea Plan Implementing Agreement (IA) specifies, in Se:tiun 9.19, that: "In the event land within the County's jurisdiction is annexed to another jurisdiction, an agreement shall be reached between County, the annexing jurisdiction, USFWS, and CDFG, as part of the annexation process, to ensure that any development of the annexed lands proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP (and, if the annexing jurisdiction is a Participating Local Jurisdiction, the goals of the Jurisdiction's Subarea Plan) and sets forth the resulting responsibilities pursuant to the MSCP for ongoing maintenance and enforcement of the terms of this agreement and the MSCP as it relates to the annexed land." Likewise, the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan requires that, when new territory is added to the City through annexation; "An MSCP Annexation Agreement shall be reached between the City of Chula Vista, the detaching jurisdiction, USFWS and CDFG, as part of the annexation process, to ensure that any development of the annexed land proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP.' (Section 4.3. I) The San Miguel Annexation Agreement specifically describes all MSCP-related requirements that must be met to meet the biological mitigation, conservation and management goals of the MSCP, and serves as the MSCP Aunexation Agreement required by LAFCO and both the County and City Subarea Plans. San Miguel Ranch is incorporated into the County's MSCP Subarea Plan as a "hard-lined" project. As such, the project is not subject to the County's Biological Mitigation Ordinance, but rather is subject to project-specific biological mitigation, conservation and management requirements. San Miguel Ranch is incorporated into the City of Chula Vista MSCP Page 5, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 Subarea Plan as a "covered project". As such, the project will not be subject to the City's new Habitat Loss and Incidental Take Permit Ordinance (HLIT). Instead, when annexed the project will be subject to project-specific biological mitigation, conservation and management requirements determined by the City and delineated in the San Miguel Ranch FSEIR-97-02 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan. The Annexation Agreement consolidates all MSCP biological requirements for the San Miguel project into one document, and assigns responsibility for each requirement to an appropriate Party to the Agreement. Thus, the Annexation Agreement insures that biological mitigation, conservation and management conditions for the project are consistent with both the County and City MSCP Subarea Plan requirements and that such conditions will meet the overall requirements of the Subregional MSCP Plan. Providing Take Authority for MSCP Covered Species and Habitat In addition to serving the purpose defined by the County and City Subarea Plans, the San Miguel Annexation Agreement provides an instrument for authorizing the "Take" of MSCP covered species and their associated habitat on San Mignel Ranch, prior to final federal and state approval of the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and receipt by the City of it's federal and State Endangered Species Act City-wide permits. Section 13.25(b) of federal regulation 50 CFR provides that the USFWS may transfer the authorization for Take from one penmit holder, in this case the County of San Diego, to another local agency. Likewise, the State of California may transfer a legal Take authorization. In order to do so, however, the local agency to which Take Authority is transferred must commit to meeting the responsibilities and obligations associated with the existing permit. The San Miguel Annexation Agreement is designed to serve as the mechanism for transferring Take Authority fi.om the County's existing MSCP federal and State permits to the City, as they specifically relate to thc San Miguel Ranch project. Thus, the Agreement details those responsibilities and obligations of the County's MSCP permit associated specifically with San Mignel Ranch and assigns those responsibilities and obligations among the parties to the Agreement. Conservation and Mitigation Obligations The following summarizes the responsibilities and obligations for biological mitigation, including conservation and management, as assigned by the San Mignel Ranch Annexation Agreement: Page 6, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 Conservation TRIMARK will place conservation easements over four areas of natural open-space designated in the Chula Vista Subarea Plan as MSCP habitat preserve: OS parcels 1, 3, 6 and 7. These parcels, shown on Attachment B, total approximately 176 acres. In addition, TRIMARK will place a conservation easement over three specified parcels ("Take down" parcels 1, 2 and 3 on Attachment B) which total approximately 11 acres and which are particularly rich with a listed endangered plant species, the Otay Tarplant. After recordation of a final map, and completion of construction activities in the development areas adjacent to the open space areas, Open Space Areas 1, 3, 6 and 7, as well as "Take down" Areas 1 and 2 will be transferred in fee title to the USFWS National Refuge, and the conservation easement will be extinguished. All habitat maintenance, management and monitoring for the transferred areas will be the responsibility of USFWS. A conservation easement will remain over the 5.93 acre "Take Down" Area number 3, and the developer will be entitled to sell mitigation credits (in the amount of 5.93 acres) on an acre-per-acre basis. Alternatively, the final five-acre "Take Down" parcel 3 may be purchased directly by USFWS and/or CDFG. Both Agencies are pursuing accounting for this purpose. Preserve Management An Otay tarplant Management Plan (OTMP) and Area Specific Management Plan (ASMP) have been prepared for San Mignel Rangh, pursuant to requirements of the project's Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). Because all open space land anticipated to be placed into the Chula Vista MSCP Preserve will be transferred in fee title to USFWS, USFWS will assume all maintenance, management and monitoring responsibility for these areas. As a result, Trimark will not be obligated to create and manage a distinct and separate Otay Tarplant Preserve or to implement the Area-specific management directives of the ASMP. The Agreement does provide that Tfimark must complete all other biological mitigation required by the San Miguel Ranch SPA Plan EIRfMMRP and the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan. These requirements include, but are not limited to, implementation of a Barrel Cactus relocation program, wetland creation and enhancement program, and revegetation of slopes adjacent to natural open space areas with native landscaping materials. Best Efforts Regarding MSCP Subarea Plan Review and Take Authority In conjunction with negotiation of this agreement, USFWS acknowledged that the priority given by all parties to resolution of the issues addressed in this agreement resulted in delays in processing the City's MSCP Subarea Plan, Implementing Agreement, and other elements necessary for the City to obtain overall take authority. Therefore, USFWS agreed to include provisions in this agreement which commit the agency to best efforts to provide noticing in the Federal Register of the City's completed application by March 2001, and best efforts to make a final decision on City take authority by July 1, 2001. Page 7, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 Addendum IS-01-032 to FSEIR 97-02 The Annexation Agreement adds minor technical changes that require review under CEQA to make the previously approved FSEIR 97-02 adequate. Generally, the Annexation Agreement provides more detail as to final biological open space preserve acreages, and changes the long- term management assumption for the open space preserves f~om the applicant or other entity, to the USFWS as part of the National Wildlife Refuge. In addition, the Agreement supercedes the obligation for Trimark to prepare, and the City to approve, a management plan for the Otay Tarplant preserve. The Agreement meets the intent of this MMRP mitigation requirement by the transfer of undisturbed open space including Otay Tarplant habitat to the USFWS for maintenance and management, and the requirement for the USFWS to prepare a management plan for the species and habitats within that open space. Pursuant to Sections 15162, these changes and clarifications are not considered new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects previously identified in FSEIR 97-02. Pursuant to Section 15164, Addendum IS-01-032 was prepared. Relationship of the agreement to settlement of the CNPS lawsuit The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) and Southwest Center for Biological Divemity filed a lawsuit against the Department of the Interior and USFWS on July 15, 1999 (California Native Plant Society, et al. v. Babbitt et. al. 98 CV 1454 BTM (LSP)) which is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The City of Chula Vista and County of San Diego are not named in this lawsuit. The plaintiffs alleged that the Biological Opinion for the County's MSCP did not adequately conserve the Otay tar plant, a federal and state endangered plant species that is located on the San Miguel Ranch Project. In addition, the plaintiffs challenge a conservation agreement (dated May 8, 1996) between Emerald Properties Corp. (the predecessors to Trimark) and USFWS which provided for the preservation of approximately 21 acres of Otay tar plant. Both the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego informed the other parties to the Annexation Agreement that the CNPS lawsuit must be settled before the Annexation Agreement (and as a result the annexation) could take effect. Negotiations between the plaintiffs of the CNPS lawsuit, USFWS, Trimark, County of San Diego and the City of Chula Vista resulted in a Memorandum of Understanding. However, the parties have not reached a final settlement agreement. Trimark has requested that both the County of San Diego and the City of Chula Vista consider the Annexation Agreement before the Settlement Agreement is officially approved by the Court, because it believes time is of the essence in its efforts to develop the San Miguel property due to restraints on its ability to grade during certain times of the year. Therefore, the Annexation Agreement before council tonight provides that the agreement will become effective only if the following occurs: the Settlement Agreement is approved by the federal court, the terms and provisions of the settlement agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City of Chula Vista and County of San Diego, and the Annexation Agreement is recorded with the County Recorders Office. Page 8, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 II. OFFSETTING THE PROJECT'S FORECASTED ANNUAL FISCAL DEFICIT The approved San Miguel Ranch Public Facilities Financing Plan and Fiscal Impact Analysis (PFFP/FIA) analyzed the costs and revenues associated with the project over time, and at buildout, and identified that projected revenues generated by the project (e.g., property tax, sales tax, etc.), would, over time, not cover the City's costs to serve the project area (e.g., police and fire service, parks and recreation, street maintenance, etc.). As presented during the SPA and Tentative Map approval process, .the FIA identified that the project would operate at a net, annual fiscal deficit of $125,100 at project buildout, due largely to property tax revenue sharing under the Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement (MPTTA) which applies to areas to be annexed. As a result, both the SPA and' Tentative Map conditions of approval required that the applicant establish a mechanism to the City's satisfaction to fund the preparation of annual fiscal reviews for the project, and prior the approval of the first Final Map within the project, to establish a permanent funding method to pay the City for the ongoing preparation of the annual reviews, and for any fiscal deficits identified by the annual reviews. Since the forecasted deficits are largely the result of the MPTTA which applies to annexations, LAFCO, at the City's request, also conditioned final annexation approval subject to thc property owner establishing a funding mechanism to the City's satisfaction. Although the identified deficit could continue indefinitely, it is difficult to forecast future revenue and expenditures. The City therefore required the deficit to be mitigated for each of the years the project is under construction, plus 10 years beyond project buildout, or 15 years total. The annual reviews would commence in year 2001 and continue through 2015. Consistent with the SPA, Tentative Map and LAFCO conditions, the proposed ordinance contains the following major components: - Establishes an account to be used for preparation of 15 annual fiscal reviews and to pay the City for any fiscal deficits identified by the annual reviews, along with various authorities and requirements for accounting and expenditures. - Requires the applicant, pr/or to completion of annexation, to deposit an initial $10,000.00 into this account to ensure availability of monies to pay for preparation of the annual fiscal reviews. - Sets forth the requirements and standards for conducting the annual fiscal reviews, starting with fiscal year 2001/2002 and continuing through fiscal year 2015/2016. -Requires the applicant or their successors and assigns in-interest to pay the City for any fiscal deficits identified by the annual reviews. Prior to approval of the first Final Map in the project, the applicant must establish a permanent mechanism to satisfy their responsibility to pay the City for the ongoing cost of preparing the annual reviews, and Page 9, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 for the identified deficits, such as a reserve account, payment of a one time, a fee to be paid with each building permit, or other method acceptable to the City. Staff has previously worked with CIC Research, Inc., who prepared the FIA, to quantify the projected costs of the deficit over time, and to develop possible funding alternatives including a one-time fee, or a fee which could be paid with each building permit (see Attachment D). This information has also been made an exhibit to the proposed ordinance. The applicant has been in possession of CIC's information regarding alternatives for the permanent funding mechanism, and is determining which approach they prefer. Staff is currently reviewing a proposed Master Final Map for the project, and will work with the applicant to make a final determination on the permanent funding mechanism, which will be brought forward for City Council action in conjunction with the Master Final Map. IlL THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH REORGANIZATION The San Miguel Ranch Reorganization encompasses 742.94 acres and includes the area within the adopted SPA Plan and Temative Subdivision Map. It is generally bounded by Proctor Valley Road to the west and south, Mother Miguel Mountain and the SDG&E Miguel Substation to the north, and the Rolling Hills Ranch project area and Otay Water District property to the east. The subject area is coterminous with existing City boundaries along the Estancia subdivision, the Rolling Hills Ranch project, and the Otay Water District/golf course property (see Attachment A- Locator). The area is specifically established in the legal metes-and-bounds description and plat map which are included as Exhibit A to the Council Resolution. As noted earlier in the report, the project area is currently within the unincorporated County of San Diego, and requires annexation to the City prior to the approval of any Final Subdivision Maps or the issuance of any grading or other permits for the project. Council's prior approvals of the project's SPA Plan and PFFP/FIA, and Tentative Map on October 19, 1999 and February 29, 2000, respectively, contained conditions of approval to be satisfied prior to completion of annexation. More specifically, those conditions regard MSCP requirements for an annexation agreement to be completed between the City, County, USFWS, CDFG and the project applicant NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, and the need for the applicant to establish a mechanism satisfactory to the City to ensure mitigation of the project's forecasted annual fiscal deficit as identified in the PFFP/FIA. LAFCO's approval the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization (Ref. No. RO99-42) on April 3, 2000, was also subject to two similar conditions; one regarding completion of the above noted MSCP Annexation Agreement, the other regarding the property owner establishing and funding a mitigating mechanism to the City's satisfaction regarding the above noted forecasted annual fiscal deficit. LAFCO's approval also designated the City as the conducting authority, authorized the City Council to conduct proceedings in compliance with the LAFCO resolution without notice and hearing, and directed that the City Council order the associated actions. A copy of LAFCO's resolution is presented in Attachment E. Page 10, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 Staff has since been working with the County, USFWS, CDFG and NNP-Tfimark San Miguel LLC, to prepare the required MSCP Annexation Agreement previously discussed in section I. of this report. The proposed ordinance establishing financing for annual fiscal reviews of the project, discussed in Section II, of this report, will satisfy LAFCO's other condition of annexation approval. It is important to note the relationship between the timing of execution of the MSCP Annexation Agreement, and the timing for completion and recordation of the reorganization. Consistent with established conditions of approval, the proposed Council Resolution approving the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization stipulates that the Certificate of Completion, issued by LAFCO, should not be granted until the MSCP Annexation Agreement has become effective. IV. THE INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT The indemnification agreement is an agreement between the City and the developer, NNP- Trimark San Miguel, LLC. The indemnification agreemem serves to protect the City in the event a claim or legal proceeding is instituted as a result of, or related to the City entering into the Annexation Agreement. The indemnification provides for the developer to defend and indemnify the City from and against all liability, damages, costs and loss relating to, arising from, or in connection with the City's processing and/or approval of the Annexation Agreement (including the granting of "take authorization"). In addition, the developer has agreed to provide security to ensure the implementation of this indemnification agreement in the event that any claim, action or proceeding is filed against the City. Security will be provided in the surn of $500,000.00 cash or a letter of credit, with $350,000.00 of that to be provided up-front and the remaining $150,000.00 if any claim is filed. If the developer fails to comply with the terms of its agreements with the City or the County, the City has retained the right to withhold the issuance of any approvals or permits, and to reconsider the Annexation Agreement approvals and rights granted thereunder. FISCAL IMPACT: MSCP Annexation Agreement- There is no negative fiscal impact to the City from entering into the Agreement. The applicant is paying all costs associated with preparing and executing the Agreement. Under the Agreement the applicant is dedicating land, and paying certain costs associated with initially establishing the preserve areas, to the USFWS. The approximately 176 acres of land in areas OS-l, -3, -6 and -7 will be conveyed into the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge and become the responsibility of the USFWS to manage and maintain. This includes the 37 acres of required Otay tarplant preserves. The 11.02 additional acres in "take down" areas 1, 2 and 3 will also be conveyed to the Refuge and become the responsibility of the USFWS. All other biological mitigation requirements and obligations associated with the project remain the responsibility of the applicant. The applicant is also responsible to fund the City's Mitigation Monitor for the project, and the City has already contracted with Recon to provide this service. Additionally, as noted below, the applicant is required to enter into a separate agreement indemnifying the City against Page 11, Item: Meeting Date: 12/19/00 any legal actions which might arise in connection to the MSCP Annexation Agreement, take authorization, or the issuance of other permits for the project. Fiscal Defter Offset Ordinance- Staff time and associated costs for preparing an implementing the ordinance are being paid by the Applicant. Adoption of the ordinance effectively creates a positive fiscal impact for the City, in that it ensures that annual fiscal analyses will be conducted for the project over the next 15 years, and that the Applicant will. establish a permanent funding mechanism to pay the City for any fiscal deficits identified by the annual reviews. San Miguel Ranch Reorganization- All staff time and associated costs for the Reorganization are being paid by the Applicant. The City and County will share property tax revenue fi.om the project area in accordance with the adopted Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement (MPTTA). As noted above, the project's Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) took into account (among other factors) the affects of the MPTTA on the projected amount of property tax revenue the City will receive from the project area. This played a direct part in the FIA's conclusion that the project will operate at an annual fiscal deficit to the City at buildout, and the resulting requirement for the Applicant to fund annual fiscal reviews of the project for 15 years, and to mitigate any fiscal deficits identified by those reviews. Indemnification Agreement- The agreement's purpose is to ensure that the City is protected in the event a claim or legal proceeding is instituted as a result of, or related to the City entering into the Annexation Agreement. Attachments: A. Locator Map B. Project Open Space and Conservation Areas C. MSCP Annexation Agreement Summary D. CIC Research's Leaer on Fiscal Deficit Calculations E. LAFCO Resolution No. RO99-42 (H:\HOME~PLANNING\ED\SAN-MIG~Amended5 mscp-agreement,a113 Jpt.doc) Project Location L ROAD SDG&E M[GUEL SUBSTATION ROLLING HILLS RANCH CHULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT LOCATER PROJECT TRI MARK PACIFIC-SAN MIGUEL LLC PROJECT DESCRIPTION: APPL,~N~ San iiquel Ranch Reor;lanization PROJECT Unincorporated County area adjacent LOCATION: to the northerly boundary of Chula Vista Request: Reorganization involving annexation of 742,94 acres to the City, detachment of 742.94 acres SCALE: FILE NUMBER: from County service area 135, and detachment of NORTH No Scale ANX - 00-01 1.03 acres from the Bonita-Sunnyside Fire District. C:\MyFiles~locators\PCS9904,cdr *11/29/00 /' ,~ ATTACHMENT "A" ATTACHMENT B SAN MIGUEL RANCH MSCP ANNEXATION AGREEMENT SUMMARY · THREE PURPOSES - FULFILLS MSCP ANNEXATION-RELATED REQUIREMENT FOR AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY, THE ANNEXING JURISDICTION, USFWS AND CDFG TO ENSURE THAT ANY DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANNEXED LANDS PROCEEDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MSCP's CONSERVATION GOALS. o ENSURES THAT APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND PROVISIONS OF THE COUNTY'S MSCP SUBAREA PLAN ARE MET, CONSOLIDATES ALL BIOLOGICAL MITIGATION AND CONSERVATON REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT IN ONE DOCUMENT, AND ASSIGNS RESPONSIBILITIES TO APPROPRIATE PARTIES. o PROVIDES FOR TRANSFER OF "TAKE AUTHORIZATION" FROM THE COUNTY TO THE CITY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF FEDERAL AND STATE "TAKE AUTHORIZATION" TO THE CITY UNDER THE CITY'S MSCP SUBAREA PLAN AND I.A. · MAIN PROVISIONS - o PROVIDES FOR THE CONSERVATION OF 176 ACRES OF MSCP OPEN SPACE ON FOUR PARCELS (OS-1,-3,-6 & -7) WITHIN THE PROJECT. 37 OF THOSE ACRES ARE REQUIRED OTAY TARPLANT MITIGATION (OS-l, 6 acres; OS-6, 31 acres). o PROVIDES FOR ADDITIONAL 11 ACRES OF VOLUNTARY OTAY TARPLANT CONSERVATION WlTIN THREE PARCELS ("take down" areas 1, 2 & 3), 1N PLACE OF 33 RESIDENTIAL LOTS SHOWN ON THE PROJECT'S APPROVED TENTATiVE MAP. o PROVIDES FOR THE EVENTUAL coNVEyANCE OF THE 176 ACRES OF MSCP OPEN SPACE/TARPLANT PRESERVES, AND THE ADDITIONAL 11 ACRE TARPLANT CONSERVATION AREA, TO THE USFWS AS PART OF THE SAN DIEGO NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. o RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINALIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE O.T.M.P. AND THE A.S.M.P., AND LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT OF THOSE LANDS, ALSO TRANSFERRED TO THE USFWS. o PROVIDES FOR SETTLEMENT OF THE CNPS's LAWSUIT AGAINST THE USFWS REGARDING OTAY TAP.PLANT. o THROUGH TRANSFER OF THE COUNTY'S MSCP "TAKE AUTHORIZATION" TO THE CITY, ALLOWS THE CITY TO ISSUE A GRADING PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT BEFORE THE END OF DECEMBER 2000. ATTACHMENT C 01/04/00 T['E i3:S9 FAX 619 637 4040 C I C RESEARCH ~005 i111 CIC RESEARCH, INC. Economic Research. Marketing Research. Environmental Research o Su~ey Research January 4, 2000 Mr. Ed Batchelder City of Chula Vista 3115 Fourth Avenue, Suite R Chula Vista CA 91910 Re: San Miguel Ranch Fiscal Deficit Funding Alternatives Dear Ed: The purpose of this letter is to present potential funding alternatives for the identified San Miguel Ranch fiscal operating deficit. The fiscal analysis presents an estimated annual net fiscal impact over the proposed development period (2001 to 2005) and one year beyond, to account for some public works costs, which do not occur until after 5 years. The fiscal impact was slightly positive in the first year and negative in the 2n~ through the 6tn year. At build-out, the estimated annual fiscal impact was a negative $125,000 (current 1999 dollars). At the request of the City of Chula Vista, ClC developed two 'funding alternatives for the forecasted fiscal impact deficit. The included table presents the net fiscal impact for the presented development period and an additional 25 years beyond build-out. Although very unlikely, for the purpose of this analysis, CIC assumed the City of Chula Vista's public costs and revenues would adjust at the same rate over the subject period. From 2008 to 2030 the fiscal deficit is assumed to remain at an annual $125,000 (FY 99/00 dollars). ClC presented different time pedods for which the developer could be responsible for the fiscal deficit. Aisc presented in the table is the estimated annual number of housing units built and sold. This absorption period was utilized in CIC's fiscal report. The table presents two funding alternatives for 5 different time periods. Although the identified fiscal deficit could continue indefinitely, it is very difficult to forecast future revenues and expenditures. The presented time periods range from a six year (consistent with the fiscal analysis) period to a 30-year period. The two funding alternatives include a one-time payment and a per-housing unit fee. The per-unit fee is to be paid at the same time as the building permit, based on the presented building schedule. Both methodologies utilize a discounted cash flow analysis (Net Present Value) of the annual deficit. In both alternatives a net present value was calculated utilizing a 3 percent 8361 Vicker3 Street · San Diego, ~alifomia 92111-2112 Telephoto. (6¢9) 6374000 o Fax: (619) 8374040 h Ol/04/00 TI'E 14:00 F.&)i 619 637 4040 C I C RESEARCH Mr. Batchelder _ January 4, 2000 Page 2 discount rate, which assumes that the difference between inflation and interest rates is 3%~ per year. The one-time payment-funding alternative ranges from $397,000 (assumes the developer is responsible for a 6-year period) to $2,170,000 (assumes the developer is responsible for a 30-year period). These one-time payments represent the net present values (NPV) of the presented cash flows utilizing the 3% discount rate. The per-unit fee is based on the above net present values divided by the number of units proposed and increased three percent each year to adjust for inflation. This fee ranges from a Iow of $293 (2001 dollars for a 6-year period) to a high of $1,805 (2005 dollars for a 30-year period) per housing unit, based on the presented absorption schedule. Based on discussions with City of Chula Vista's department heads, a period to include 10 years beyond the build out represents an equitable time period for which the developer should be responsible for the fiscal deficit. This represents a 15-year period from 2001 to 2015. Utilizing the two presented funding alternatives results in a ooe time fee of $1.2 million or a per- building permit fee, which ranges from $896 in 2001 to $1,008 by 2005. Sincerely, Mark Crooks Senior Market Analyst MCC:slf The 3% discount rate was calculated using a 3% inflation rate and a 6% return on funds. CIG Research, Inc. 8361 Vickem S~et · San Diego, California 92I 11-2112 Telephone (619) 6374600 ,Fax: (619) 637-4040 ul/u4/uo I'LE 14:00 FAX 619 637 4040 C I C RESEARCH ~004 Proposed San Miguel Development Potential Funding Alternatives for Fiscal Operating Deficit Alternative Alternative Per Building Permit Fee One-ti me 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Time Period Payment . (2001 (2002 (2003 (2004 (2005 for Estimates (FY99/O0 dollars) dollars) dollars) dollars) dollars) dollars) 6 Year 2001 to 2006 $396.,623 $293 $302 $311 $320 $330 10 Year 2001 to 2010 $785,905 $581 $598 $616 $635 $654 15 Year 2001 to 2015 $1,212,042 $896 $922 $950 $979 $1,008 25 Year :' 2001 to 2025 $1,836,993 $1,357 $1,398 $1,440 $1,483 $1,528 ' 30 Year [ [2001 to 2030: $2,170,.2.39 .$1,604 $1,652 $1,701] $1,752 $1,805 !) Assumes 3% inflation and 6% interest (net discount rate of 3%) ~2) Assumes the City of Chula Vista's public costs and revenues djust at the same rata over the subject period 3) The one-time payment fee is in FY 99/00 dollars, the per building permit 'fee is presented in · 2001 to 2005 dollars. Net Fiscal (O00s) Build-Out Number (FY99/00 Schedule of Years Year dollars) (units) I 1 i 2001 $0.41 300 i 2I 2002 ($41.9)1 350 I 3I.. 2003 ($72.0) 266 i 4 2004 ($109.1) 301 t 5 2005 ($104.3) 177 t 6 2006 ($125.1) 0 [ 7 2007 ($1215:1) I 8 2008 ($125.1) I 9 2009 ($125.1) 10 2010 ($125.1) 11 2011 ($125.1) 12 2012 ($125.1) [ 13 2013 ($125.1) ] 14 2014 ($125.1) 15 to 301 2015 to-2030 ($125.1) per year Source: CIO Research. Inc. December 1999 Minute Item: 4 Ref. No.: RO99-42 RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE "SAN MIGUEL RANCH REORGANIZATION" (CITY OF CHULA VISTA) On motion of Commissioner Mathis, seconded by Commissioner Davis, the following resolution is adopted: WHEREAS, a petition was submitted to this Commission for annexation of territory to the City of Chula Vista, and detachment from County Service Area No. 135 (San Diego Regional Communications) which petition was cer[ified sufficient by the Executive Officer on March 20, 2000; and WHEREAS, the reorganization was modified to include detachment of 1.03 acres from Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District (added to Resolution per Government Code Section 56854); and WHEREAS, the territory proposed for reorganization is as described in the application on file with the Local Agency Formation Commission; and WHEREAS, the Executive Officer of the Commission has filed his report on said reorganization, which report was received and considered by the Commission; and WHEREAS, all owners of land have consented in writing to the reorganization; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Commission hereby finds, determines, and orders as follows: 1. The Commission adopts, pursuant to Section 15096(h) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations previously adopted by the City of Chula Vista, as lead agency, as shown in Exhibit B attached hereto. 2. The Commission adopts the findings included in the resolution of approval of the City of Chula Vista for the impacts identified in the Environmental Impact Report, and certifies that the mitigation is within the jurisdiction of the City of Chula Vista and not LAFCO because the affected resources and services will be within the city limits upon annexation. 3. The Commission hereby approves the reorganization with boundaries as described in Exhibit A attached hereto for the reasons set forth in the Executive Officer's repot[, subject to the following conditions: a. Pursuant to conditions regarding a forecasted annual fiscal deficit, contained in the SPA and Tentative Map, the property owner will establish and fund a mitigating mechanism to the City's satisfaction. b. Pursuant to requirements of the County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) regarding the annexation of land, the County, the City of Chula Vista, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game and the property owner shall execute an agreement in accordance with the requirements of the MSCP, prior to the recordation of the certificate of completion for the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization. 4. The boundaries of the territory as described in Exhibit A are definite and certain. 5. The boundaries of the territory do not conform to lines of assessment and ownership. 6. The districts are registered-voter districts. 7. The territory includes 742.94 acres and is uninhabited. 8. The territory proposed for reorganization is hereby designated the "San Miguel Ranch Reorganization" (City of Chula Vista). 9. The Commission hereby designates the City of Chuia Vista as the conducting authority and authorizes the City Council to conduct proceedings in compliance with this resolution without notice and heating. 10. The Commission directs the City of Chula Vista, as conducting authority, to order the following actions: a. Annexation of 742.94 acres to the City of Chula Vista. b. Detachment of 742.94 acres from County Service Area No. 135 (San Diego Regional Communications). c. Detachment of 1.03 acres from Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District (added to Resolution per Government Code Section 56854). 11. The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and directed to mail certified copies of this resolution as provided in Section 56853 of the Government Code. 2 Passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Diego this 3rd day of April, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Davis, Jacob, Mathis, Vandedaan, and Wootton; and Alternate Commissioners Cox, Pocklington, and Sessom NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Horn and Nygaard ABSTAINING: None STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) I, MICHAEL D. OTT, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Diego, State of California, hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the odginal resolution adopted by said Commission at its regular meeting on Apdl 3, 2000, which original resolution is now on file in my office; and that same contains a full, true, and correct transcript therefrom and of the whole thereof. Witness my hand this 12th day of April, 2000. MICHAEL D. OTT, Executive Officer San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission R 1!-\1 i -5.e.Cl l<:l-Iq-oo =Ii /~ ) RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSER V A TION PROGRAM (MSCP) ANNEXATION AGREEMENT FOR THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH PROJECT AMONG THE CITY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, AND NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC, CONCERNING THE CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGICAL MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT, AND ADOPTING ADDENDUM IS- 01-032 TO THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND TENTATIVE MAP (FSEIR 97-02) WHEREAS, on October 19, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution 19631 approving the approximately 743 acre San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and related documents; and WHEREAS, on February 29, 2000, the City Council approved a Master Tentative Subdivision Map for the approximately 743 acre San Miguel Ranch project by Resolution No. 2000-068; and WHEREAS, the project area is currently within the unincorporated County of San Diego, and requires annexation to the City prior to the approval of any Final Subdivision Maps or the issuance of any grading or other permits for the project; and WHEREAS, the project is also located within the boundaries of the adopted County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) (as shown on Exhibit 1) Subarea Plan, South County Segment; and WHEREAS, The County of San Diego MSCP Subarea Plan Implementing Agreement (IA) specifies, in Section 9.19, that: "In the event land within the County's jurisdiction is annexed to another jurisdiction, an agreement shall be reached between County, the annexing jurisdiction, USFWS, and CDFG, as part of the annexation process, to ensure that any development of the annexed lands proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP (and, if the annexing jurisdiction is a Participating Local Jurisdiction, the goals of the Jurisdiction's Subarea Plan) and sets forth the resulting responsibilities pursuant to the MSCP for ongoing maintenance and enforcement of the terms of this agreement and the MSCP as it relates to the annexed land."; and WHEREAS, the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan requires that, when new territory is added to the City through annexation, "An MSCP Annexation Agreement shall be reached between the City ofChula Vista, the detaching jurisdiction, USFWS and 1<0 A-I CDFG, as part of the annexation process, to ensure that any development of the annexed land proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP." (Section 4.3.1); and WHEREAS, on November 22, 1999, Trimark Pacific-San Miguel, LLC, filed an application by landowner petition with the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the approximately 743 acre San Miguel Ranch project area to the City ofChula Vista from the unincorporated area of the County; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2000, the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) adopted a Resolution (Ref. No. R099-42) approving the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization subject to conditions, one of which reads, "Pursuant to requirements of the County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) regarding the annexation of land, the County, City of Chula Vista, the United States United States Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department ofFish and Game and the property owner shall execute an agreement in accordance with the requirements of the MSCP, prior to recordation of the certificate of completion for the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization"; and WHEREAS, the City, County of San Diego, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department ofFish and Game (CDFG) and the project applicant NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, have negotiated and prepared the required MSCP Atmexation Agreement ("Agreement") for the San Miguel Ranch project (attached hereto as Exhibit 2); and WHEREAS, as required by LAFCO, and pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.19 of the County of San Diego MSCP lA, the Agreement contains necessary provisions to ensure that any development of the annexed lands under the City's jurisdiction proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP, and sets forth the resulting responsibilities pursuant to the MSCP for ongoing maintenance and enforcement of the terms of the Agreement and the MSCP as it relates to San Miguel Ranch; and WHEREAS, the Agreement also serves as a mechanism that will enable the legal "Take" ofMSCP covered species and associated habitats within San Miguel Ranch, prior to final federal and State approval of the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and issuance of federal and State Endangered Species Act permits to the City; and WHEREAS, a Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR-97-02) for the San Miguel Ranch project and annexation was certified by the City Council on October 19, 1999, by Resolution No. 19630 along with attendant Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and WHEREAS, the Annexation Agreement will result in only minor technical changes or additions which are necessary to make the FSEIR 97 -02 adequate under 2 !C,A-<9, CEQA, and Addendum IS-O I -032 to FSEIR 97-02 has been prepared in conformance with Section 15164 oflhe CEQA Guidelines (Addendum attached as Exhibit 3). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, detennine, resolve and order as follows: I. The City Council does hereby determine that no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is necessary for the City to approve the Agreement. 2. The City Council does hereby find that the Addendum FSEIR-97-02, the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for this Project have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City ofChula Vista. 3. The City Council approves the MSCP Annexation Agreement presented in Exhibit I attached hereto and made a part hereof, and authorizes the Mayor to sign the Agreement of behalf of the City, provided, however, that certain Side Agreement to the Annexation Agreement identified herein is executed by Trimark and USFWS.. 4. That the City Council approves the Grading Agreement and Side Agreement to the Annexation Agreement presented in Exhibit IA and Exhibit IB, respectively, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and authorizes the Mayor to sign the Agreements on behalf of the City. 5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file certified copies of this resolution with the Executive Officer ofLAFCO. 6. That, pursuant to the condition of approval under Item 3.b of LAFCO Resolution R099-42, the Executive Officer ofLAFCO will not issue a certificate of completion for the purposes of finalization and recordation of the reorganization until the Agreement has become effective. Presented by Approved as to form by Robert A. Leiter Director of Planning & Building CL mA9t9u2 Ir~ John M. Kaheny - City Attorney (H\shared\san-mig\ Council MSCP Agreement Resolution.doc) 3 I G. A -...2 IA AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2000, by and between NNP-Trimark San Miguel Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Trimark) and the city of Chula Vista (city), a municipal corporation. Trimark hereby agrees as follows: NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC agrees to modify the storm drain system, known as line "F" as shown on sheet 00040-34 of the grading plans, to diminish offsite erosion caused by increased runoff to the tributary stream. The modification shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and will be added as a construction change to the plans prior to any installation of permanent improvements. (NEXT PAGE IS SIGNATURE PAGE) 1 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN NNP-TRlMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement on the date specified above. CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPLICANT NNP- TRlMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Shirley Horton, Mayor BY: ATTEST: Stephen E. Hester Its: Vice President Approved as to form: By: Susan Bigelow City Clerk Approved as to form: Andrew Hartzell Attorney for Applicant By: John M. Kaheny city Attorney H:\Home\Attorney\Agree\Trimark.SMR 2 \0 \ , Agreement Concerning Conservation of 166 acres on San Miguel North Side Agreement To The Annexation Agreement Concerning The Conservation and Biological Mitigation Program for the Implementation of San Miguel Ranch By and Among The City ofChula Vista The United States Fish and Wildlife Service And NNP- Trimark San Miguel Ranch, LLC The City ofChula Vista (CITY), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and NNP- Trimark San Miguel Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (TRIMARK) are each a party to that Agreement known as the Annexation Agreement Concerning the Conservation and Biological Mitigation Program for the Implementation of San Miguel Ranch (the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT) (herein collectively referred to as the "Parties"). The ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provides for the conservation of certain property within the project area known as San Miguel Ranch and within the area known as San Miguel North. The ORIGINAL AGREEMENT also provides for the transfer of Take Authorizations, as such pertain to the San Miguel Ranch, for Incidental Take of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take. The ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provides that the existing Take Authority of the County of San Diego (COUNTY) with respect to the San Miguel Ranch will transfer to CITY. CITY, as a condition ofUSFWS and California Department ofFish and Game (CDFG) approving the transfer of the Take Authorization~, acknowledges that TRIM ARK is required to implement a number of provisions, including the conservation of certain property and transfer of such property in fee title to the United States of America for inclusion in the San Diego Wildlife Refuge (the Refuge). The property required to be conserved and transferred in fee title to the Refuge includes 166 acres located in San Miguel North (the "San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel"), as depicted on Exhibit F and legally described on Exhibit G in the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. RECITALS A. WHEREAS, TRIMARK is the owner of approximately 166 acres known as the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel. B. WHEREAS, CITY, USFWS and TRIMARK are parties to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. C. WHEREAS, Exhibit I, Section A(i) of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provides the following: "As soon as practicable after the Effective Date, and subject to Section 6(C)ofthis Agreement, TRIMARK shall cause the transfer, in fee, of 166 acres located in San Miguel North, as depicted on Exhibit F and legally described on Exhibit G (the "San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel") to the United States of America for inclusion in the San Diego Wildlife Refuge. As of the date that CITY has extended the Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK, the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel shall only be utilized in a manner consistent with conservation purposes and shall be fully accessible to the managers and employees/subcontractors of the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge, who shall be entitled to take any actions they deem appropriate for conservation management. The San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel is not being annexed into CITY at this time; accordingly, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Agreement, CITY shall not be responsible for enforcing this Paragraph A(i)." D. WHEREAS, Tentative Map No. CVT 99-04, approved by CITY for the San Miguel Ranch Project, includes a condition that prior to approval of a final map, the applicant (TRIMARK) shall enter into a Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SSIA) with CITY which shall delineate, to the satisfaction of CITY, that applicant (TRIMARK) has satisfied mitigation measures required by the adopted San Miguel Ranch Environmental Impact Report (EIR). E. WHEREAS, the adopted San Miguel Ranch EIR, finds that "the mitigation measures for this project will include implementation of the previously agreed upon requirements established within a Conservation Bank Agreement... signed.... With the USFWS and the CDFG in August 1997." F. WHEREAS, the Conservation Bank Agreement referenced by the San Miguel Ranch EIR provides for the conservation of the 166-acre San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel. 2 G. WHEREAS, the County Subarea Plan Figure 1-1 depicts the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel as land which is to be conserved, subject to agreement with USFWS; and Section 3.3.3.5 of the County Subarea Plan specifies that the subject agreement provides for "166 acres of the Northern Parcel to be preserved." H. WHEREAS, the Implementing Agreement between the County of San Diego and USFWS serves as the contract through which the County implements its MSCP Subarea Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES TO AGREEMENT AGREES AS FOLLOWS: 1.) NOTWITHSTANDlNG the provisions of Exhibit 1, Section A(i) of the ORIGlNAL AGREEMENT, pursuant to this Side Agreement to the ORIGlNAL AGREEMENT, CITY, USFWS and TRIMARK do hereby represent and warrant the following: A. CITY CITY hereby acknowledges that it will enforce provision A(I) of Exhibit I of the original agreement by requiring Trimark to convey San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel to the San Diego Wildlife Refuse in accordance with the terms herein. B. USFWS USFWS hereby acknowledges that, upon delivery by TRIMARK to the United States of a good and sufficient grant deed conveying to the United States a marketable title to the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel of such character as to be satisfactory to the Attorney General of the United States, it will accept the transfer offee title of the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel, and will assume all liability and responsibility for continued conservation, maintenance and management of the land. USFWS further acknowledges that CITY shall not be held responsible for such maintenance or management. C. TRIMARK TRIMARK acknowledges and agrees that Condition 15 of Tentative Tract Map No. CYT 99-04 requires the full conveyance of the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel to the San Diego Wildlife Refuge prior to approval by CITY of the first final map for the San Miguel Ranch Project. TRIMARK further acknowledges and agrees to convey said parcel to the San Diego Wild Life Refuge prior to approval by the City of the first final map for the Project. 3 'I n NOTWITHSTANDING Section 6 (C) of the ORlGINAL AGREEMENT, USFWS agrees that THE City shall not accept Take Authority from the County pursuant to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT ifTRlMARK exercises its right pursuant to this provision to not perform under the ORlGINAL AGREEMENT. In such instance, USFWS agrees that the CITY shall not have any obligations to perform in accordance with the provisions of the ORlGINAL AGREEMENT. 3.) Prior to the CITY's approval of the First Final Map that contains any property within the San Miguel Ranch Project located west ofSR-125, TRlMARK shall provide the CITY with proof of its compliance, to the CITY's satisfaction, with paragraph _ of the side letter dated December ,2000 between TRlMARK and USFWS, which letter is attached hereto as Exhibit _ of the CITY's Take Authority Permit. 4 , . SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT CONCERNING CONSERVATION OF 166 ACRES ON SAN MIGUEL NORTH IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement. CITY OF CHULA VISTA UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of The Department of Interior of the United States of America By: Shirley Horton Mayor By: Michael Spear Title: ATTEST: Susan Bigelow City Clerk NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Stephen E. Hester Its: Vice President John M. Kaheny, City Attorney By: H: \Homc\Attorney\Agree\S M R. S ide.doc 5 Area Subject to Annual Fiscal Reviews I SDG&E MIGUEL SUB-STATION i ~~ ~ BONITA LONG CANYON ~~ C HULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR PROJECT TRI MARK PACIFIC-SAN MIGUEL LLC. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C) APPLICANT San Miquel Rancm PROJECT Unincorporated County area adjacent Fiscal Impact Review Ordinance LOCATION: to the northerly boundary of Chula Vista. SCALE: FILE NUMBER: An ordinance establishing a Fiscal Impact Review Process NORTH No Scale PCM - 96-04 and Fund for the San Miguel Ranch Planned Community. C:\MyFiles\locators\PCM9604.cdr 11/29/00 II! A j~ EXHIBIT 1 R~~ j .!.e-D l.;l-/q-OO Jlem =# /~ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM (MSCP) ANNEXATION AGREEMENT FOR THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH PROJECT AMONG THE CITY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, AND NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC, CONCERNING THE CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGICAL MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT, AND ADOPTING ADDENDUM IS- 01-032 TO THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND TENTATIVE MAP (FSEIR 97-02) WHEREAS, on October 19, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution 19631 approving the approximately 743 acre San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and related documents; and WHEREAS, on February 29, 2000, the City Council approved a Master Tentative Subdivision Map for the approximately 743 acre San Miguel Ranch project by Resolution No. 2000-068; and WHEREAS, the project area is currently within the unincorporated County of San Diego, and requires annexation to the City prior to the approval of any Final Subdivision Maps or the issuance of any grading or other permits for the project; and WHEREAS, the project is also located within the boundaries of the adopted County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) (as shown on Exhibit 1) Subarea Plan, South County Segment; and WHEREAS, The County of San Diego MSCP Subarea Plan Implementing Agreement (IA) specifies, in Section 9.19, that: "In the event land within the County's jurisdiction is annexed to another jurisdiction, an agreement shall be reached between County, the annexing jurisdiction, USFWS, and CDFG, as part of the annexation process, to ensure that any development of the annexed lands proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP (and, if the annexing jurisdiction is a Participating Local Jurisdiction, the goals of the Jurisdiction's Subarea Plan) and sets forth the resulting responsibilities pursuant to the MSCP for ongoing maintenance and enforcement of the terms of this agreement and the MSCP as it relates to the annexed land."; and WHEREAS, the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan requires that, when new territory is added to the City through annexation, "An MSCP Annexation Agreement shall be reached between the City ofChula Vista, the detaching jurisdiction, USFWS and I Cc A-I CDFG, as part of the annexation process, to ensure that any development of the annexed land proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP." (Section 4.3.1); and WHEREAS, on November 22,1999, Trimark Pacific-San Miguel, LLC, filed an application by landowner petition with the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the approximately 743 acre San Miguel Ranch project area to the City ofChula Vista from the unincorporated area of the County; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2000, the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) adopted a Resolution (Ref. No. R099-42) approving the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization subject to conditions, one of which reads, "Pursuant to requirements of the County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) regarding the annexation ofland, the County, City ofChula Vista, the United States United States Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department ofFish and Game and the property owner shall execute an agreement in accordance with the requirements of the MSCP, prior to recordation of the certificate of completion for the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization"; and WHEREAS, the City, County of San Diego, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department ofFish and Game (CDFG) and the project applicant NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, have negotiated and prepared the required MSCP Annexation Agreement ("Agreement") for the San Miguel Ranch project (attached hereto as Exhibit 2); and WHEREAS, as required by LAFCO, and pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.19 of the County of San Diego MSCP lA, the Agreement contains necessary provisions to ensure that any development of the annexed lands under the City's jurisdiction proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP, and sets forth the resulting responsibilities pursuant to the MSCP for ongoing maintenance and enforcement of the terms of the Agreement and the MSCP as it relates to San Miguel Ranch; and WHEREAS, the Agreement also serves as a mechanism that will enable the legal "Take" of MSCP covered species and associated habitats within San Miguel Ranch, prior to final federal and State approval of the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and issuance of federal and State Endangered Species Act permits to the City; and WHEREAS, a Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR-97-02) for the San Miguel Ranch project and annexation was certified by the City Council on October 19, 1999, by Resolution No. 19630 along with attendant Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and WHEREAS, the Annexation Agreement will result in only minor technical changes or additions which are necessary to make the FSEIR 97-02 adequate under 2 I G,A-<9. CEQA, and Addendum IS-OI-032 to FSEIR 97-02 has been prepared in conformance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines (Addendum attached as Exhibit 3). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows: I. The City Council does hereby determine that no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is necessary for the City to approve the Agreement. 2. The City Council does hereby find that the Addendum FSEIR-97-02, the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for this Project have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City ofChula Vista. 3. The City Council approves the MSCP Annexation Agreement presented in Exhibit I attached hereto and made a part hereof, and authorizes the Mayor to sign the Agreement of behalf of the City, provided, however, that certain Side Agreement to the Annexation Agreement identified herein is executed by Trimark and USFWS.. 4. That the City Council approves the Grading Agreement and Side Agreement to the Annexation Agreement presented in Exhibit IA and Exhibit IB, respectively, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and authorizes the Mayor to sign the Agreements on behalf of the City. 5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file certified copies of this resolution with the Executive Officer ofLAFCO. 6. That, pursuant to the condition of approval under Item 3.b ofLAFCO Resolution R099-42, the Executive Officer ofLAFCO will not issue a certificate of completion for the purposes of finalization and recordation of the reorganization until the Agreement has become effective. Presented by Approved as to form by Robert A. Leiter Director of Planning & Building cA-- "nL~9Hu2 irA-<. John M. Kaheny - City Attorney (H\shared\san-mig\ Council MSCP Agreement Resolution.doc) , J J ~A.-...2, JA AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2000, by and between NNP-Trimark San Miguel Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Trimark) and the City of Chula Vista (city), a municipal corporation. Trimark hereby agrees as follows: NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC agrees to modify the storm drain system, known as line "F" as shown on sheet 00040-34 of the grading plans, to diminish offsite erosion caused by increased runoff to the tributary stream. The modification shall be to the satisfaction of the city Engineer and will be added as a construction change to the plans prior to any installation of permanent improvements. (NEXT PAGE IS SIGNATURE PAGE) 1 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement on the date specified above. CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPLICANT NNP- TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Shirley Horton, Mayor BY: ATTEST: Stephen E. Hester Its: Vice President Approved as to form: By: Susan Bigelow City Clerk Approved as to form: Andrew Hartzell Attorney for Applicant By: John M. Kaheny city Attorney H:\Home\Attorney\Agree\Trimark.SMR 2 \b Aereement Concernine Conservation of 166 acres on San Mieuel North Side Agreement To The Annexation Agreement Concerning The Conservation and Biological Mitigation Program for the Implementation of San Miguel Ranch By and Among The City of Chula Vista The United States Fish and Wildlife Service And NNP- Trimark San Miguel Ranch, LLC The City ofChula Vista (CITY), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and NNP-Trimark San Miguel Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (TRIMARK) are each a party to that Agreement known as the Annexation Agreement Concerning the Conservation and Biological Mitigation Program for the Implementation of San Miguel Ranch (the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT) (herein collectively referred to as the "Parties"). The ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provides for the conservation of certain property within the project area known as San Miguel Ranch and within the area known as San Miguel North. The ORIGINAL AGREEMENT also provides for the transfer of Take Authorizations, as such pertain to the San Miguel Ranch, for Incidental Take of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take. The ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provides that the existing Take Authority of the County of San Diego (COUNTY) with respect to the San Miguel Ranch will transfer to CITY. CITY, as a condition ofUSFWS and California Department ofFish and Game (CDFG) approving the transfer of the Take Authorization~, acknowledges that TRIM ARK is required to implement a number of provisions, including the conservation of certain property and transfer of such property in fee title to the United States of America for inclusion in the San Diego Wildlife Refuge (the Refuge). The property required to be conserved and transferred in fee title to the Refuge includes 166 acres located in San Miguel North (the "San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel"), as depicted on Exhibit F and legally described on Exhibit G in the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. RECITALS A. WHEREAS, TRIMARK is the owner of approximately 166 acres known as the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel. B. WHEREAS, CITY, USFWS and TRIMARK are parties to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. C. WHEREAS, Exhibit 1, Section A(i) of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provides the following: "As soon as practicable after the Effective Date, and subject to Section 6(C)ofthis Agreement, TRIMARK shall cause the transfer, in fee, of 166 acres located in San Miguel North, as depicted on Exhibit F and legally described on Exhibit G (the "San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel") to the United States of America for inclusion in the San Diego Wildlife Refuge. As of the date that CITY has extended the Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK, the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel shall only be utilized in a manner consistent with conservation purposes and shall be fully accessible to the managers and employees/subcontractors of the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge, who shall be entitled to take any actions they deem appropriate for conservation management. The San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel is not being annexed into CITY at this time; accordingly, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Agreement, CITY shall not be responsible for enforcing this Paragraph A(i)." D. WHEREAS, Tentative Map No. CVT 99-04, approved by CITY for the San Miguel Ranch Project, includes a condition that prior to approval of a final map, the applicant (TRIMARK) shall enter into a Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SSIA) with CITY which shall delineate, to the satisfaction of CITY, that applicant (TRIMARK) has satisfied mitigation measures required by the adopted San Miguel Ranch Environmental Impact Report (EIR). E. WHEREAS, the adopted San Miguel Ranch EIR, finds that "the mitigation measures for this project will include implementation of the previously agreed upon requirements established within a Conservation Bank Agreement... signed.... With the USFWS and the CDFG in August 1997." F. WHEREAS, the Conservation Bank Agreement referenced by the San Miguel Ranch EIR provides for the conservation of the 1 66-acre San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel. 2 G. WHEREAS, the County Subarea Plan Figure I-I depicts the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel as land which is to be conserved, subject to agreement with USFWS; and Section 3.3.3.5 of the County Subarea Plan specifies that the subject agreement provides for" 166 acres of the Northern Parcel to be preserved." H. WHEREAS, the Implementing Agreement between the County of San Diego and USFWS serves as the contract through which the County implements its MSCP Subarea Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES TO AGREEMENT AGREES AS FOLLOWS: I.) NOTWITHST ANDING the provisions of Exhibit I, Section A(i) of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, pursuant to this Side Agreement to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, CITY, USFWS and TRIMARK do hereby represent and warrant the following: A. CITY CITY hereby acknowledges that it will enforce provision A(I) of Exhibit I of the original agreement by requiring Trimark to convey San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel to the San Diego Wildlife Refuse in accordance with the terms herein. B. USFWS USFWS hereby acknowledges that, upon delivery by TRIMARK to the United States of a good and sufficient grant deed conveying to the United States a marketable title to the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel of such character as to be satisfactory to the Attorney General of the United States, it will accept the transfer offee title of the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel, and will assume all liability and responsibility for continued conservation, maintenance and management of the land. USFWS further acknowledges that CITY shall not be held responsible for such maintenance or management. C. TRIMARK. TRIMARK acknowledges and agrees that Condition 15 of Tentative Tract Map No. CVT 99-04 requires the full conveyance of the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel to the San Diego Wildlife Refuge prior to approval by CIlY of the first final map for the San Miguel Ranch Project. TRIMARK. further acknowledges and agrees to convey said parcel to the San Diego Wild Life Refuge prior to approval by the City of the first final map for the Project. 3 2.) NOTWITHSTANDING Section 6 (C) of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, USFWS agrees that THE City shall not accept Take Authority from the County pursuant to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT ifTRIMARK exercises its right pursuant to this provision to not perform under the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. In such instance, USFWS agrees that the CITY shall not have any obligations to perform in accordance with the provisions of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. 3.) Prior to the CITY's approval of the First Final Map that contains any property within the San Miguel Ranch Project located west of SR-125, TRIMARK shall provide the CITY with proof of its compliance, to the CITY's satisfaction, with paragraph _ of the sideletter dated December ,2000 between TRIMARK and USFWS, which letter is attached hereto as Exhibit _ of the CITY's Take Authority Permit. 4 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT CONCERNING CONSER V A TION OF 166 ACRES ON SAN MIGUEL NORTH IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement. CITY OF CHULA VISTA UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of The Department of Interior of the United States of America By: Shirley Horton Mayor By: Michael Spear Title: ATTEST: Susan Bigelow City Clerk NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Stephen E. Hester Its: Vice President John M. Kaheny, City Attorney By: H: \H omc\A ttorney\Agrcc\SM R. S ide. doc 5 Exh-,bir 2. RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY CLERK WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 4th Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 No transfer tax is due as this is a conveyance to a public agency of less than a fee interest for which no cash consideration has been paid or received. NNP - Trimark San Miguel Ranch. LLC Developer (Space Above For Recorder's Use Only) ANNEXATION AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGICAL MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN MIGUEL RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP BY AND AMONG THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO THE UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME AND NNP-TRlMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC This Annexation Agreement Concerning the Conservation and Biological Mitigation Program for the Implementation of the San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area Plan and Tentative Tract Map ("Biological Annexation Agreement" or "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the _ day of ,2000, by and among the City ofChula Vista ("CITY"), the County of San Diego, a political subdivision of the State of California ("COUNTY"), the United States Fish & Wildlife Service ("USFWS"), an agency of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America, the California Department ofFish & Game ("CDFG"), a subdivision of the California Resources Agency of the State of California, and NNP-Trimark San Miguel Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("TRIMARK") (herein collectively referred to as the "Parties"), and defines the Parties' responsibilities, obligations and Incidental Take and other authorizations and provides a common understanding of actions that will be undertaken for the conservation of the Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take and their habitats during the construction, development and operation of the approximately 743-acre mixed residential and commercial project known as the San Miguel Ranch, presently located within COUNTY and within the sphere of influence of CITY, through implementation of the San Miguel Ranch Sectional 12.12.00 5017.00001 S:\161 \990900 13.A 1 O.wpd /IoW) Planning Area Plan and tentative tract map (including all necessary off-site grading shown in the tentative tract map). RECITALS A. WHEREAS, TRIMARK is the owner of certain real property consisting of approximately 738 acres, located in the COUNTY and within the sphere of influence of the CITY, which together with an adjoining and related five-acre area is known as San Miguel Ranch and depicted in Exhibit A hereto ("San Miguel Ranch"); B. WHEREAS, approximately 1,852 acres ofa former portion of San Miguel Ranch has been preserved as permanent open space as depicted in Exhibit B hereto (these 1,852 acres are herein referred to as "San Miguel North"); C. WHEREAS, this Agreement concerns and affects San Miguel Ranch; D. WHEREAS, San Miguel Ranch is included within the area encompassed by the COUNTY's Subarea Plan ("County Subarea Plan") for the regional San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program ("MSCP") in which the Incidental Take of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take is authorized under the Section lO(a) Permit issued by USFWS and/or the CESAlNCCP Authorization issued by CDFG (hereafter collectively referred to as the "Take Authorizations") to the COUNTY in accordance with the MSCP, County Subarea Plan and County Implementation Agreement ("County IA"), provided that certain biological mitigation is provided; E. WHEREAS, the MSCP describes a cooperative federal, state and local program of conservation for a number of sensitive species of plants and animals, and is a product of lengthy study and negotiation by USFWS, CDFG, COUNTY and other interested persons, jurisdictions and entities, and represents coordination of private development and conservation interests with federal, state and local governments; F. WHEREAS, COUNTY is participating in the development and implementation of the MSCP to meet the requirements of the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended ("ESA"), the California Endangered Species Act ("CESA"), the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEP A"), the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act of 1991 ("NCCP Act") and to minimize potential obstacles to public and private development in the greater San Diego area posed by the current system of project-by-project review under the ESA and CESA; G. WHEREAS, consistent with the NCCP Act, the MSCP is a comprehensive, long-term habitat conservation plan intended to provide for the needs, protection and conservation ofthe region's wildlife and plant heritage while continuing to allow effective enforcement of public health and safety programs and appropriate development and growth; H. WHEREAS, such planning is an effective tool in protecting the region's biodiversity while reducing conflicts between protection of wildlife and plants and the reasonable use of natural resources for economic development; 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\16\ \990900 13.A1 O.wpd 2 '/f' I / lJ ,! (r 1. WHEREAS, the MSCP addresses the potential impacts of urban growth, natural habitat loss and species endangerment and creates a plan to mitigate for the potential loss of Covered Species and their habitats due to the direct and indirect impacts of future development of both private and public lands within the MSCP Area; J. WHEREAS, the MSCP, as implemented through the County Subarea Plan and County lA, establishes the conditions under which COUNTY, for the benefit of itself and of public and private landowners and other land development project proponents within its subarea boundaries, is authorized to allow the incidental taking of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take in connection with land development and other lawful land uses authorized by the County; K. WHEREAS, TRIMARK has identified the appropriate biological mitigation for San Miguel Ranch through extensive negotiations with USFWS and CDFG, which mitigation is identified more specifically below; 1. WHEREAS, this Agreement (i) obligates TRIMARK to implement various specific conservation, biological mitigation and take minimization measures set forth in the County Subarea Plan and COUNTY Take Authorizations with respect to San Miguel Ranch, (ii) includes in Section 4 (with the exception of those take minimization measures specified in the COUNTY Take Authorizations) all of the Take mitigation and Take minimization measures required for San Miguel Ranch under the MSCP, the County Subarea Plan and County IA and all of the biological conservation measures provided under CITY's SPA Plan and tentative tract map for the project (and all of the measures otherwise required by the Parties as a condition of transferring the Take Authorizations to CITY), (iii) provides the basis for COUNTY transferring the Take Authorizations to CITY and for the CITY extending Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK in connection with CITY issuing grading permits or other authority to TRIMARK, and (iv) extends Third Party Beneficiary status to TRlMARK in a manner consistent with Section 17 of the County IA and eventually the City IA; M. WHEREAS, concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, this Agreement is being recorded in the COUNTY recorder's office as required by Section 17.I.A(3) of the County IA and runs with the land and is enforceable against and binding upon TRlMARK and any successor in interest to TRIMARK. N. WHEREAS, CITY is currently a Non-Participating Local Jurisdiction in the MSCP, but intends to become a Participating Local Jurisdiction in the MSCP and has submitted a Subarea Plan for the CITY ("City Subarea Plan") as part of its applications for Take Authorizations from USFWS and CDFG. On issuance of the Take Authorizations to CITY, the City Subarea Plan will become a component of the regional MSCP; O. WHEREAS, the MSCP envisions that the biological mitigation and take minimization requirements for San Miguel Ranch under the MSCP would be the same under both the County Subarea Plan and the City Subarea Plan, if and when such subarea plans are adopted; 12-12'()0 5017-00001 S:\161\99090013.AIO.wpd 3 /(p/1'/ P. WHEREAS, COUNTY, CITY, USFWS and CDFG intend that the Take Authorizations anticipated to be issued to the CITY in connection with a USFWS and CDFG approved City Subarea Plan will authorize Incidental Take of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take on San Miguel Ranch in a manner fully consistent with the COUNTY's Take Authorizations, and intend to require the same biological mitigation for San Miguel Ranch for such Incidental Take as required by the COUNTY in its MSCP Subarea Plan and additional conservation as otherwise agreed to by the Parties in this Agreement; Q. WHEREAS, CITY contemplates annexing portions oflands currently within the COUNTY, including San Miguel Ranch, in the near term; R. WHEREAS, Section 4 of this Agreement meets and exceeds the biological measures, Take minimization measures and conservation goals ofthe MSCP and County Subarea plan; S. WHEREAS, CITY has acknowledged in the July 11, 1996 draft Chula Vista Subarea Plan that the preservation ofthe 1 ,852-acre San Miguel North constitutes a significant and extraordinary benefit to the residents of the CITY and the region; T. WHEREAS, CITY approved a Sectional Planning Area ("SPA") Plan for San Miguel Ranch and certified an Environmental Impact Report for the same in October 1999 and approved a tentative tract map for San Miguel Ranch in February 2000; U. WHEREAS, TRIMARK desires to implement the approved SPA Plan and the approved tentative tract map for the 743-acre project; V. WHEREAS, TRIMARK desires to secure Incidental Take authorization for all portions of San Miguel Ranch prior to USFWS and CDFG approval of the City Subarea Plan and issuance of Take Authorizations to CITY under the City Subarea Plan; W. WHEREAS, it is to the benefit of all Parties that the biological mitigation for the Incidental Take of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take on San Miguel Ranch become binding on TRIMARK at the earliest possible date. X. WHEREAS, Section 9.19 of the County IA provides that "In the event land within the County's jurisdiction is annexed to another jurisdiction, an agreement shall be reached between the County, the annexing jurisdiction, USFWS, and CDFG, as part of the annexation process, to ensure that any development of the annexed lands proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP (and, if the annexing jurisdiction is a Participating Local Jurisdiction, the goals of the Jurisdiction's Subarea Plan) and sets forth the resulting responsibilities pursuant to the MSCP agreement and the MSCP as it relates to the annexed land." Y. WHEREAS, TRIMARK submitted a complete annexation application to LAFCO to annex San Miguel Ranch into the CITY which was approved in April 2000, and as a condition of approval of the annexation, LAFCO has required that an annexation agreement such as this Agreement be executed by the Parties. 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161\990900 13.AI O.wpd 4 J(/"A:i Z. WHEREAS, CDFG granted Incidental Take authority to COUNTY under the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act ("NCCP Act"); AA. WHEREAS, CDFG has the authority, consistent with California Code of Regulations Title XIV, S 783.6 among other authority, to approve a transfer of COUNTY's Incidental Take authority under COUNTY's CESAlNCCP Authorization, as such relates to San Miguel Ranch, to CITY; BB. WHEREAS, pursuant to 50 C.F.R. S 13.25(b), USFWS may approve the partial transfer of COUNTY's ITP to CITY, as such Incidental Take permit authority relates to San Miguel Ranch, provided that USFWS determines that the provisions of S 13.25(b)(1), (2) and (3) are satisfied; CC. WHEREAS, under the NCCP, MSCP, County Subarea Plan and County IA and in accordance with 50 C.F.R. S 13.25, COUNTY may transfer to CITY authorization for the Incidental Take of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take prior to CITY adoption and approval of a MSCP Subarea Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties enter into this Agreement: (1) to assure that the same biological mitigation, conservation and take minimization measures are imposed upon TRIMARK, and any successors and assigns, by both COUNTY and CITY pursuant to their respective MSCP Subarea Plans through Section 4 of this Agreement and the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations, as such apply to San Miguel Ranch, (2) to transfer the Take Authorizations, as they apply to San Miguel Ranch, from COUNTY to CITY, for Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take, (3) to enable TRIMARK and its successors and assigns to incidentally Take Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take on San Miguel Ranch in accordance with both the approved development and the conservation activities thereon by extension of CITY's Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK, and (4) to provide TRIMARK with Third Party Beneficiary status under the County IA and, upon approval of the City Subarea Plan by USFWS and CDFG, and issuance of an ITP by USFWS, and issuance of a Section 2835 Take authorization by CDFG, under the City IA. AGREEMENT SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS A. "CESAlNCCP Authorization" means any authorization issued III accordance with the County IA by CDFG under the NCCP Act, CESA, or both. B. "City IA" means the Implementing Agreement between CITY, USFWS and CDFG executed in connection with the approval of the City Subarea Plan. C. "Covered Species" means those species within the MSCP Area which will be adequately conserved by the MSCP when the MSCP is implemented through the Subarea Plans 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161\9909001J.AIO.wpd 5 1(" ACf or which will be adequately conserved through the permitting process pursuant to Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 9 1344. These species are listed in Exhibit C. D. "Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take" means those species qualifying as Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take under the County IA and COUNTY Take Authorizations and, upon USFWS and CDFG approval of the City Subarea Plan and issuance ofan ITP by USFWS and issuance of an NCCP Take authorization from CDFG to CITY, those species qualifying as Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take under the City IA and ITP. E. "CWA" means the federal Clean Water Act, also known as the federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. SS 1251 et seo., as amended. F. "Effective Date" means that first date upon which: (I) this Agreement is entered into by the Parties, (2) this Agreement is recorded with the San Diego County Recorder's Office, and (3) ajudge has approved a settlement agreement in Case No. 99CV1454-L (LAB), filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of California between the United States of America, acting through the Department of Justice, and the California Native Plant Society ("CNPS") and all other plaintiffs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties understand and agree that this Agreement will not be deemed effective until the CITY and COUNTY have reviewed said settlement agreement and are satisfied with the terms and provisions of said settlement agreement. G. "Incidental Take" means both the Take of a Covered Species incidental to and not the purpose of the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity, as defined in the ESA, and its implementing regulations and the Take of a Covered Species pursuant to a CESAlNCCP Authorization. H. "ITP" means an incidental take permit under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the federal Endangered Species Act. I. "MSCP" means the Multiple Species Conservation Program Plan, a comprehensive habitat conservation planning program which addresses multiple species habitat needs and the preservation of native vegetation for an approximate 900-square mile. area in southwestern San Diego County, California. J. "MSCP Plan Area" consists of approximately 900 square miles in southwestern San Diego County, referred to in the MSCP as the "MSCP Study Area." The MSCP Plan Area is depicted on Exhibit A of the County IA. K. "NCCP Act" means the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act of 1991, enacted by Chapter 765 of the California statutes of 1991 (A.B. 2172) (codified in part at California Fish and Game Code SS 2800, et seo.), as amended, including all regulations promulgated pursuant to that Act. L. "Participating Local Jurisdiction" means any of the local governments identified in Exhibit B ofthe County IA which prepares and receives USFWS and CDFGapproval 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161 \990900 13.A 1 O.wpd 6 IIoR-IO of a Subarea Plan, which receives an ITP from USFWS, an NCCP Take authorization from CDFG, and which enters into an Implementing Agreement with the USFWS and CDFG. M. "County Subarea Plan" means the Multi-Species Conservation Program County of San Diego Subarea Plan Adopted October 22, 1997 prepared by COUNTY to implement the MSCP within its jurisdictional boundaries and reviewed and approved by the USFWS and CDFG. N. and the NCCP Act. "Take" and "Taking" shall have the meanings provided by the ESA, CESA All other defined terms not defined herein shall have the meaning provided by the County IA. SECTION 2. PURPOSES The purposes ofthis Agreement are: A. Consistent with the goals of the MSCP identified in Section 1.3 of the County lA, to assist with the conservation of biodiversity within the MSCP Plan Area and achieve certainty in the land development process for TRIMARK and any of its successors and assigns. B. To comply with Section 9.19 of the County IA. C. To ensure that COUNTY's and CITY's biological mitigationrequirements for the San Miguel Ranch are the same, as anticipated and provided for in the MSCP, the County Subarea Plan, the City Subarea Plan (not yet approved) and this Agreement. D. To ensure that a local jurisdiction exists to enforce, and will enforce, the requirements of the MSCP and the County Subarea Plan for the San Miguel Ranch property, as such are fully reflected in Section 4 of this Agreement and the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations (shown in Exhibit D hereto), as such apply to San Miguel Ranch, with respect to the physical development of the San Miguel Ranch at all times in the future; provided, however, that except for the construction and maintenance of the two trails identified in Paragraph A(ii) and (iv) of Exhibit I hereto and the construction (but not the maintenance) of the associated fencing for such trails, CITY and COUNTY shall not be responsible for ensuring or enforcing the conservation, maintenance, management or monitoring of areas described in Exhibit I hereto, or enforcing or ensuring the COUNTY Take Authorizations with respect to such areas, which are to be managed by the National Wildlife Refuge System or other federal or State agency. E. To transfer the Take Authorizations, as such relate to San Miguel Ranch for all necessary on-site and off-site grading shown in the tentative tract map referenced in Recital T herein, from COUNTY to CITY, thereby enabling CITY to extend such Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK upon issuance of a CITY grading permit to TRIMARK. 12-12-00 5017-00001 s:\ 161 \990900 13.AI O. wpd 7 (IpA-11 F. To ensure a seamless transition in the performance of biological mitigation obligations and conservation measures and use of Incidental Take authorization regardless of whether Incidental Take authorization is being derived from the COUNTY's Take Authorizations, as transferred to CITY under this Agreement, or the CITY's Take Authorizations, should such latter authorizations be issued to CITY by USFWS and CDFG in conjunction with an approval of the City Subarea Plan. G. To ensure that TRlMARK shall be a Third Party Beneficiary: (1) under the County IA upon the execution of this Agreement and the recordation of same with the San Diego County Recorder's office, and (2) under the City IA should the USFWS and CDFG approve the City Subarea Plan and issue Take Authorizations to CITY. H. To ensure that the assurances, protections and rights provided by USFWS and CDFG to COUNTY with respect to San Miguel Ranch pursuant to the County lA, which are incorporated by reference into the COUNTY Take Authorizations, are provided to CITY with respect to San Miguel Ranch through transfer of the COUNTY Take Authorizations, as such apply to San Miguel Ranch, from COUNTY to CITY. I. To ensure that TRlMARK implements all of the mitigation and conservation measures which are its obligation to implement under Section 4 of this Agreement and to ensure that all Parties adhere to their obligations under this Agreement. J. To ensure that development of the San Miguel Ranch proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP, the COUNTY's Subarea Plan, this Agreement and any future City Subarea Plan. SECTION 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES A. COUNTY. (i) COUNTY is a "Participating Local Jurisdiction" as defined in the County IA. (ii) COUNTY has authority to transfer the Take Authorizations, as they apply to San Miguel Ranch, to CITY for Incidental Take of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take so as to enable CITY to extend such Incidental Take authority to TRlMARK and authorize TRlMARK to incidentally take the Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take pursuant to, and in compliance with, the ESA, CESA and NCCP Act for purposes of implementing the SPA Plan and tentative tract map referenced in Recital T hereto, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the COUNTY's Take Authorizations, County Subarea Plan, County IA and this Agreement. (iii) Upon (a) the Effective Date of this Agreement, and (b) the recordation of this Agreement, TRlMARK shall be deemed a Third Party Beneficiary under the County lA, and the benefits of Third Party Beneficiary status under Section 17 of the County IA shall extend to TRlMARK, and remain in effect unless, prior to the extension ofIncidental Take a,uthority from the CITY to TRlMARK concurrent with CITY's issuance of a grading permit to TR,lMARK, TRlMARK alters the project in a manner that increases or substantially alters impacts to biological 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161 \990900 13.AI O. wpd 8 !0A-!:A resources on, or fails to maintain the biological values of, the land committed for biological mitigation pursuant to this Agreement while TRIMARK owns fee title in such land committed for biological mitigation. If the project is altered in this manner, the Third Party Beneficiary status is automatically extinguished, and the subsequent creation of Third Party Beneficiary status will require biological review and imposition of mitigation for the increased or altered impacts. However, Third Party Beneficiary status shall not be extinguished as a result of impacts to biological values resulting from natural or other causes beyond TRIMARK' s control, as determined by the USFWS and CDFG, including fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken by the Third Party Beneficiary to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to the land within San Miguel Ranch resulting from such causes. COUNTY acknowledges that (I) any plant salvage operations approved by CITY and not inconsistent with this Agreement, or (2) any activity within jurisdictional "waters of the United States," as defined by the CW A, which has been approved by CITY and authorized under the CW A, will not result in TRIMARK's loss of Third Party Beneficiary status. (iv) The portions of San Miguel Ranch covered by the COUNTY's Take Authorizations (and under the terms of the County Subarea Plan and County IA) are shown in Exhibit E hereto. (v) The biological mitigation and take minimization measures and the conservation goals of the MSCP imposed on TRIMARK and San Miguel Ranch under the MSCP, the County Subarea Plan, the County lA, and COUNTY Take Authorizations are entirely encompassed in Section 4 of this Agreement (including Exhibit 1 thereto, which is incorporated by reference) and the COUNTY Take Authorizations, as such apply to San Miguel Ranch, and COUNTY will look to CITY to enforce only these obligations under Section 4 of this Agreement and the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations (as such apply to San Miguel Ranch) provided, however, that except for the construction and maintenance ofthe two trails identified in Paragraph A(ii) and (iv) of Exhibit 1 hereto and the construction (but not the maintenance) of the associated fencing for such trails, CITY shall not be responsible for enforcing Section 4 or the COUNTY Take Authorizations in those areas owned or managed by the National Wildlife Refuge System or other federal or State agency. CITY has no obligation to enforce any other provision of the County Subarea Plan not otherwise set forth in this Agreement. (vi) As to those mitigation, minimization and conservation provisions of Section 4 concerning San Miguel Ranch for which TRIMARK has responsibility, COUNTY shall cede and assign its enforcement obligations to CITY as to TRIMARK and its successors and assigns, upon execution of this Agreement. This Subparagraph (vi) shall not apply to those responsibilities or obligations which are that of the National Wildlife Refuge System or other federal or State agency. (vii) COUNTY agrees that except for the construction and maintenance of the two trails identified in Paragraph A(ii) and (iv) of Exhibit 1 hereto and the construction (but not the maintenance) ofthe associated fencing for such trails, neither CITY nor TRIMARK shall be responsible for ensuring that the conservation areas described in Exhibit I of Section 4 (Items A(i)- (v)) are properly managed by the National Wildlife Refuge, its employees, agents or subcontractors. 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\l61\99090013.AIO.wpd 9 )GIf - /3 B. CITY. (i) CITY approved a SPA Plan for San Miguel Ranch in October 1999 (Resolution No. 19631) and approved and certified a Subsequent EIR for the SPA Plan and Tentative Maps in 1999 and 2000, respectively, which imposes biological mitigation measures consistent with, and not exceeding, the mitigation agreed to in Section 4 ofthis Agreement. (ii) CITY accepts the transfer of the COUNTY Take Authorizations, as such pertain to the San Miguel Ranch, for Incidental Take of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take and shall extend such Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK for all 743 acres of San Miguel Ranch concurrent with issuance of grading permits for the San Miguel Ranch provided that no clearing, grading or grubbing activities may be commenced by TRIMARK until and unless TRIMARK is in compliance with Section 6(A) of this Agreement and its mitigation obligations (or has provided the necessary assurances thereof) under Section 4 of this Agreement, as determined by the CITY and USFWS. In this respect CITY and USFWS acknowledge that some elements of the obligations in Section 4 are designed to be implemented subsequent to initial grading. CITY also shall extend Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK through written authorization for activities that may not require a grading permit, such as plant salvage operations, if such activities are necessary to implement the SPA Plan and tentative tract map referenced in Recital T. (iii) CITY will not impose or require or seek to impose or require any additional biological mitigation measures, take minimization measures, land restrictions, biological avoidances measures or monetary compensation on or from TRIMARK as long as: (1) no such measures are required by CDFG or USFWS to be implemented by the CITY with respect to San Miguel Ranch, or (2) the SPA Plan or tentative tract map for San Miguel Ranch referred to in Recital T of this Agreement is not revised so as to create more significant negative impacts to biological resources such that CITY finds that additional biological mitigation for such impacts is required. (iv) CITY, as a condition ofUSFWS and CDFG approving the transfer of the Take Authorizations from COUNTY to CITY, acknowledges that TRIMARK is required to implement a number of the provisions of Section 4 of this Agreement and comply with the transferred Take Authorizations (as such apply to San Miguel Ranch). CITY agrees to exercise its enforcement authority with respect to TRIMARK, and its successors and assigns, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations; provided, however, that except for the construction and maintenance of the two trails identified in Paragraph A(ii) and (iv) of Exhibit 1 hereto and the construction (but not the maintenance) of the associated fencing for such trails, CITY shall not be responsible for enforcing Section 4 or COUNTY Take Authorization in those areas owned or managed by the National Wildlife Refuge System or other federal or State agency. (v) CITY agrees to assure funding for implementation of the take mitigation, minimization and conservation measures imposed on TRIMARK under Section 4 of this Agreement and, as applicable, the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations by enforcing against 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161 \990900 13.A 1 O. wpd 10 /0A ~/(( TRlMARK the funding obligations set forth in Paragraphs A(vi) and B(v) of Exhibit 1 of this Agreement. (vi) CITY shall diligently review and, if necessary, provide TRlMARK comments on any biological maintenance or management plans concerning San Miguel Ranch. C. TRlMARK (i) TRlMARK has the full right, power and authority to convey, or cause to be conveyed, the fee simple title to the lands described in Paragraphs A(i)-(v) of Exhibit 1 of this Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. (ii) TRlMARK, as a condition ofUSFWS and CDFG approving the transfer of the Take Authorizations from COUNTY to CITY, shall fully implement its obligations under the provisions of Section 4 ofthis Agreement; provided that CITY extends the Incidental Take authority to TRlMARK for San Miguel Ranch and that TRlMARK is not prevented from completing its grading of San Miguel Ranch by virtue of litigation initiated by a third party. If TRlMARK is prevented from completing this grading by virtue of such litigation, TRlMARK shall only be required to provide the mitigation, minimization and conservation measures required of it under Section 4 to a level commensurate with the Incidental Take on San Miguel Ranch that has already occurred including Take caused by TRlMARK's activities other than grading, and TRlMARK's remaining mitigation, minimization and conservation obligations shall be suspended until such time as TRlMARK is able to resume its grading activities. (iii) TRlMARK acknowledges that CITY has authority to enforce all of the conservation measures required of TRlMARK in Section 4 of this Agreement and the COUNTY Take Authorizations, as such relate to San Miguel Ranch, upon CITY's extension of its Incidental Take authority to TRlMARK under the Take Authorizations transferred from COUNTY to CITY in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. (iv) TRlMARK agrees to fully fund the biological conservation measures which are its responsibility to fund under Section 4 of this Agreement through the mechanisms set forth in that Section. (v) Notwithstanding any provisions of this Agreement, and despite the assurances provided to TRlMARK by USFWS, CDFG, and COUNTY as a Third Party Beneficiary under the County IA and the assurances provided to CITY pursuant to Section 3(0) (vii) and (E) (vii) ofthis Agreement, if the CITY is required to provide additional conversation, biological mitigation or take minimization measures for the development of San Miguel Ranch as a result of the approval ofthe City Subarea Plan, TRIMARK shall bear the cost of such additional biological measures; provided that this covenant shall not apply if CITY seeks to require such additional biological measures other than through the City Subarea Plan approval. CITY shall consult with TRIMARK prior to imposing any new additional measures on TRIMARK. 12-12-00 5017-00001 8:\161 \990900 13.AI O.wpd 11 ....- /(0 It -I ':J D. CDFG (i) CDFG agrees that this Agreement complies with the requirements of Section 9.19 of the County IA. (ii) CDFG acknowledges that COUNTY has the authority to transfer to CITY, COUNTY's Take Authorizations, as such relate to San Miguel Ranch and the implementation of the approved SPA Plan and approved tentative tract map. (iii) CDFG acknowledges that CITY may extend Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK under the COUNTY's CESAlNCCP Authorization to implement the approved SPA Plan and tentative tract map upon CITY's issuance of a grading permit to TRIMARK. CDFG acknowledges that CITY may extend Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK under the COUNTY's CESAlNCCP Authorization in connection with CITY's approval of activities which do not require a grading permit, such as certain plant salvage operations, if such activities are necessary to implement the SPA Plan and tentative tract map referenced in Recital T. (iv) CDFG acknowledges that TRIMARK shall become a Third Party Beneficiary to the County IA upon satisfaction of the conditions of Section 3(A)(iii) of this Agreement and that TRIMARK shall be deemed a Third Party Beneficiary under the City IA upon execution of the same by CDFG; provided that TRIMARK is in compliance with Section 4 of this Agreement. (v) CDFG shall not alter orrequire City to alter or seek to alter or seek to require City to alter the conservation mitigation or impact minimization obligations imposed on TRIMARK pursuant to Section 4 of this Agreement and the COUNTY's transferred Take Authorizations, consistent with TRIMARK having obtained, and continuing to maintain, Third Party Beneficiary status through this Agreement and the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations. (vi) The biological mitigation and Take minimization measures and the conservation goals of the MSCP imposed on TRIMARK and San Miguel Ranch under the MSCP, the County Subarea Plan, the County IA and the COUNTY Take Authorizations are entirely encompassed in Section 4 of this Agreement and the COUNTY Take Authorizations (as such apply to San Miguel Ranch), and CDFG will look to CITY to enforce only those obligations under this Agreement and the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations; provided, however, that except for the construction and maintenance of the two trails identified in Paragraph A(ii) and (iv) of Exhibit I hereto and the construction (but not the maintenance) of the associated fencing for such trails, CITY shall not be responsible for enforcing Section 4 or the COUNTY Take Authorization in those areas owned or managed by the National Wildlife Refuge System or other federal or State agency. CITY has no obligation to enforce any other provision ofthe County Subarea Plan not otherwise set forth in this Agreement and the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations. (vii) CDFG agrees that the assurances, protections and rights provided by CDFG to COUNTY with respect to San Miguel Ranch pursuant to the County IA and which are incorporated by reference into the COUNTY Take Authorizations will be provided to CITY with 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161\990900 13.A 1 O. wpd 12 /CoA- -/G respect to San Miguel Ranch through trlllsfer of the COUNTY Take Authorizations, as they apply to San Miguel Ranch, from COUNTY to CITY. (viii) CDFG agrees that, except for the construction and maintenance ofthe two trails identified in Paragraph A(ii) and (iv) of Exhibit I hereto and the construction (but not the maintenance) of the associated fencing for such trails, neither CITY, COUNTY nor TRIMARK shall be responsible for ellsuring that the conservation areas described in Exhibit I (Items A(i)-( v)) are properly conserved, maintained, managed or monitored by the National Wildlife Refuge, its employees, agents or subcontractors and CITY shall not be responsible for enforcing Section 4 as against any entity other thlll TRIMARK. (ix) CDFG acknowledges that after approval of the City Subarea Plan by CDFG and USFWS and issuance of Take Authorizations to CITY that cover San Miguel Ranch, CITY shall only be required to enforce its Subarea Plan and Section 4 of this Agreement and the Take Authorizations issued to CITY in conjunction with its Subarea Plan against TRIMARK. (x) CDFG agrees that the provisions of this Agreement ensure that funding will be available to implement the biological conservation and mitigation measures required ofTRIMARK described in Section 4 herein and the COUNTY Take Authorizations transferred to CITY. (xi) CDFG shall review and provide TRIMARK and CITY with comments on any biological maintenance or management plans concerning San Miguel Ranch which require CDFG review, and shall use its reasonable efforts to do so without delay and in an expedited fashion. E. USFWS (i) USFWS agrees that this Agreement complies with the requirements of Section 9.19 of the County IA; (ii) USFWS acknowledges that COUNTY has the authority to transfer to CITY, COUNTY's Take Authorizations, as such relate to San Miguel Ranch and the implementation of the approved SPA Plan and approved tentative tract map. (iii) USFWS acknowledges that CITY may extend Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK under the COUNTY's MSCP ITP to implement the approved SPA Plan and tentative tract map upon CITY's issuance of a grading permit to TRIMARK. USFWS acknowledges that CITY may extend Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK under the COUNTY's MSCP ITP in connection with CITY's approval of activities which do not require a grading permit, such as certain plant salvage operations, if such activities are necessary to implement the SPA Plan and tentative tract map referenced in Recital T. (iv) USFWS acknowledges thatTRIMARK shall become a Third Party Beneficiary to the County IA upon satisfaction of the conditions of Section 3(A)(iii) of this 12-12-00 5017-00001 s:\ 161 \990900 13.A 10.wpd 13 /~A -/7 Agreement and that TRlMARK shall be deemed a Third Party Beneficiary under the City IA upon execution ofthe same by USFWS; provided that TRlMARK is in compliance with Section 4 of this Agreement. (v) USFWS shall not alter or require CITY to alter or seek to alter or seek to require CITY to alter the conservation, mitigation or impact minimization obligations imposed on TRlMARK pursuant to Section 4 of this Agreement and the COUNTY's transferred Take Authorizations, consistent with TRlMARK having obtained, and continuing to maintain, Third Party Beneficiary status through this Agreement and the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations. (vi) The biological mitigation and Take minimization measures and the conservation goals of the MSCP imposed on TRlMARK and San Miguel Ranch under the MSCP, the County Subarea Plan, the County IA and the COUNTY Take Authorizations are entirely encompassed in Section 4 of this Agreement and the COUNTY Take Authorizations (as such apply to San Miguel Ranch), and USFWS will look to CITY only to enforce those obligations under this Agreement and the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations; provided, however, that except for the construction and maintenance of the two trails identified in Paragraph A(ii) and (iv) of Exhibit I hereto and the construction (but not the maintenance) of the associated fencing for such trails, CITY shall not be responsible for enforcing Section 4 or the COUNTY Take Authorization in those areas owned or managed by the National Wildlife Refuge System or other federal or State agency. CITY has no obligation to enforce any other provision of the County Subarea Plan not otherwise set forth in this Agreement and the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations. (vii) USFWS agrees that the assurances, protections and rights provided by USFWS to COUNTY with respect to San Miguel Ranch pursuant to the County IA and which are incorporated by reference into the COUNTY Take Authorizations will be provided to CITY with respect to San Miguel Ranch through transfer ofthe COUNTY Take Authorizations, as they apply to San Miguel Ranch, from COUNTY to CITY. (viii) USFWS agrees that, except for the construction and maintenance of the two trails identified in Paragraph A(ii) and (iv) of Exhibit I hereto and the construction (but not the maintenance) of the associated fencing for such trails, neither CITY, COUNTY nor TRlMARK shall be responsible for ensuring that the conservation areas described in Exhibit I of Section 4 (Items A(i)-(v)) are properly conserved, maintained, managed or monitored by the National Wildlife Refuge, its employees, agents or subcontractors and CITY shall not be responsible for enforcing Section 4 or the COUNTY's Take Authorizations as against any entity other than TRlMARK. (ix) USFWS acknowledges that after approval of the City Subarea Plan by CDFG and USFWS and issuance of Take Authorizations to CITY that cover San Miguel Ranch, CITY shall only be required to enforce its Subarea Plan and Section 4 of this Agreement and the Take Authorizations issued to CITY in conjunction with its Subarea Plan against TRlMARK. (x) USFWS agrees that the provisions of this Agreement ensure that funding will be available to implement the biological conservation and mitigation measures required 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:1I61 \990900 13.A 1 O. wpd 14 1&/t-18 of TRIMARK described in Section 4 herein and the COUNTY Take Authorizations transferred to CITY. (xi) USFWS shall review and provide TRIMARK and CITY with comments on any biological maintenance or management plans concerning San Miguel Ranch which require USFWS review, and shall use its reasonable efforts to do so without delay and in an expedited fashion. (xii) USFWS shall use its reasonable efforts to expedite the review of the City of Chula Vista's ITP application, including the lA, and intends to place the notice of availability of a habitat conservation plan and receipt of an application for an ITP for the City of Chula Vista, San Diego County, California in the Federal Register by March 1,200 I, and anticipates a permit decision by July 1,2001. (xiii) USFWS agrees that Conditions E and Kofthe "Special Terms and Conditions" of the ITP issued to COUNTY (PRT-840414) shall not apply to CITY as part of the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations. USFWS acknowledges that equivalent protections to these two Special Conditions are provided by this Agreement. (xiv) As soon as practicable after the Effective Date, USFWS shall ensure that $165,000 of funds held by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation ("NFWF") in Account No. 2400-6220 are immediately made available for the management and monitoring by USFWS of the Otay tarplant populations located in the open space areas referenced in Paragraphs A(ii)-(v) of Exhibit I to this Agreement. (xv) Subsequent to the Effective Date, except for the construction and maintenance of the two trails identified in Paragraph A(ii) and (iv) of Exhibit I hereto and the construction (but not the maintenance) of the associated fencing for such trails, USFWS shall undertake the maintenance, management and monitoring of the species and habitats within the open space areas referenced in Paragraphs A(i)-(v) of Exhibit 1 in a manner consistent with the conservation goals ofthe MSCP and the County Subarea Plan, as explained more fully in Section 4 of this Agreement. SECTION 4. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, MITIGATION AND IMPACT MINIMIZATION MEASURES A. TRIMARK shall implement the conservation, mitigation and impact minimization measures set forth in Exhibit 1 attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. All Parties recognize that the level of conservation TRIMARK is undertaking pursuant to this Agreement exceeds the requirements ofthe County Subarea Plan and the requirements of the City Subarea Plan. As part of this Agreement and as set forth in more detail in the Donation of Lands Agreement and Option to Purchase Agreement referenced in Paragraphs A(iv) and (v) of Exhibit I ofthis Agreement, TRIMARK is receiving certain rights to sell mitigation "credits," and USFWS and CDFG are making "best efforts" commitments to obtain funding to purchase 5.174 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161 \990900 13 .AI O. wpd 15 /01'-/9 acres of land within San Miguel Ranch to compensate TRlMARK at fair market value for its conservation of those lands and the corresponding loss of otherwise developable residential lots. B. Subsequent to the Effective Date, USFWS shall prepare a management plan for the species and habitats within the open space areas referenced in Paragraphs A(i)-(v) of Exhibit 1 to Section 4, consistent with the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, Refuge Recreation Act of 1962, the ESA, and Executive Order 12996 (Management and General Public Use of the National Wildlife Refuge System). USFWS shall prepare a Comprehensive Management Plan and step down refuge management plan. The USFWS has determined that management in accordance with these statutes and the Executive Order is consistent with the conservation goals of the MSCP and the County Subarea Plan. Accordingly, the USFWS shall manage the areas referenced in Paragraph A(i)-(v) in accordance with the Comprehensive Management Plan and step down refuge management plan and shall include in its annual budget requests sufficient funds to fulfill those obligations consistent with the MSCP and the County Subparea Plan. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, CITY shall not be required to enforce any of the plans referenced in this Section 4(B). C. This Agreement supersedes the provisions of the San Miguel Ranch SPA Plan Environmental Impact Report/Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program, and other related CITY project approvals, with respect to TRlMARK's obligation to prepare and CITY's obligation to approve (1) a management plan for the Otay tarplant preserves, and (2) an area-specific management plan for natural open space areas on San Miguel Ranch. Unless superseded by this Agreement, TRlMARK will comply with all of the provisions of the San Miguel Ranch SPA Plan Environmental Impact Report/Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program and other CITY conditions of approval. SECTION 5. TRANSFER OF TAKE AUTHORIZATION FROM COUNTY TO CITY A. USFWS recognizes that this Agreement qualifies as a "joint submission" of CITY and COUNTY under 50 C.F.R. ~ 13.25. B. On the Effective Date, USFWS shall provide CITY with a new ITP identifying CITY as the permittee of the transferred portion of the COUNTY's ITP relating to San Miguel Ranch. The ITP issued to CITY will be in the form attached hereto at Exhibit E, except that CITY shall be identified as the "permittee", a new permit number will be provided and Conditions E and K of the "Special Terms and Conditions" of the COUNTY ITP shall not be included. C. COUNTY hereby transfers the Take Authorizations issued to COUNTY for the San Miguel Ranch property to CITY. D. CDFG approves the transfer of the Take Authorizations issued to COUNTY under the NCCP Act for the San Miguel Ranch property to CITY. E. CDFG acknowledges and confirms that CITY, having received the Take Authorizations described in this Agreement from COUNTY, may extend the Incidental Take 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161 \990900 13.A 1 O.wpd 16 I (PA-~() authority to TRIMARK subsequent to the execution of this Agreement by all Parties and subject to Section 8 of this Agreement. SECTION 6. TAKE AUTHORIZATION FROM CITY A. Concurrent with any issuance of a grading permit to TRIMARK for the area of San Miguel Ranch east of the proposed location of State Route 125, CITY shall extend Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK for all 743 acres of San Miguel Ranch provided that TRIMARK is in compliance with all of its obligations under Section 4 of this Agreement and the requirements of the transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations. TRIMARK shall not utilize the Incidental Take authority under this Section 6(A) unless TRIMARK has first obtained a grading permit for such activity from CITY, or CITY provides other authorization to TRIMARK for activities on San Miguel Ranch which could result in Incidental Take of Covered Species. CITY shall not unreasonably withhold authorization to TRIMARK: (I) to salvage or relocate sensitive plant species on San Miguel Ranch, or (2) to conduct activities within "waters of the United States," as defined by the CW A, if such latter activities are authorized under the CW A and approved by CITY. B. Upon approval of the City Subarea Plan by CITY, USFWS and CDFG and the related issuance of Take Authorizations to CITY by USFWS and CDFG: (I) CITY shall automatically extend to TRIMARK and TRIMARK shall accept the Incidental Take authority for the Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take from CITY for all 743 acres of San Miguel Ranch, pursuant to the City Subarea Plan, City IA and CITY Take Authorization, and (2) CITY shall be deemed to have extended Third Party Beneficiary status to TRIMARK under the City IA at such time, provided that TRIMARK is in compliance with all of its obligations under Section 4 of this Agreement and the requirements ofthe transferred COUNTY Take Authorizations. At such time, TRIMARK's Incidental Take authority derivative of the COUNTY's Take Authorizations shall not be relied upon further for subsequent Incidental Take activities. C. TRIMARK's obligations, covenants and responsibilities under this Agreement shall not be in effect until CITY issues the grading permit to TRIMARK for those portions of San Miguel Ranch east of the proposed alignment for State Route 125 and extends the Incidental Take authority for all 743 acres of San Miguel Ranch to TRIMARK. Unless waived by TRIMARK in writing, if CITY has not issued such a grading permit(s) and accompanying Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK by December 22, 2000, TRIMARK shall have no obligation or responsibility to perform under this Agreement. SECTION 7. ALLOCATION OF CREDIT FOR CONSERVATION VALUE OF SAN MIGUEL NORTH Given the unique history and relationship of San Miguel North and San Miguel Ranch, CITY and COUNTY agree that either CITY or COUNTY, or both, may reflect credit in their respective subarea plans and habitat accounting systems for the full amount of open space acreage contained in both San Miguel North and San Miguel Ranch; provided that if CITY or COUNTY, or both, reflect( s) such credit, such party or parties also shall reflect the acreage and habitat types lost through the full approved development of San Miguel Ranch, as such is developed. If either CITY 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161 \990900 13.AI O. wpd 17 /~I1.;:Z1 or COUNTY, or both, reflect(s) such credit, such party shall note in its public record-keeping of MSCP lands developed and conserved a notation that San Miguel Ranch may constitute a double- entry in the Habitat accounting system. SECTION 8. CONDITION PRECEDENT. This Agreement shall not be effective until: (1) the Parties execute this Agreement, (2) record the same with the San Diego County Recorder's Office, and (3) a judge has approved a settlement agreement in Case No. 99CV1454-L (LAB), filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of California. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties understand and agree that this Agreement will not be deemed effective until the CITY and COUNTY have reviewed said settlement agreement and are satisfied with the terms and provisions of said settlement agreement. SECTION 9. FORCE MAJEURE In the event that TRlMARK is wholly or partially prevented from performing obligations under this Agreement because of unforeseeable causes beyond the reasonable control of and without the fault or negligence ofTRlMARK ("force majeure"), including but not limited to acts of God, labor disputes, sudden actions ofthe elements, or actions of federal or State agencies or other local jurisdictions, TRlMARK shall be excused from whatever performance is affected by such unforeseeable cause to the extent so affected, and such failure to perform shall not be considered a material violation or breach, provided that nothing in this Section shall be deemed to authorize TRlMARK to violate ESA or CESA, and provided further that: (A) The suspension of performance is of no greater scope and no longer duration than is required by the force majeure; (B) Within two weeks after the occurrence of the force majeure TRlMARK gives CITY written notice describing the particulars of the occurrence; (C) TRlMARK uses its best efforts to remedy its inability to perform (however, this paragraph shall not require the settlement of any strike, walk-out, lock-out or other labor dispute on terms which in the sole judgment ofTRlMARK are contrary to its interest); and (D) When TRlMARK is able to resume performance of its obligations, TRIMARK shall give CITY written notice to that effect. effective during Section 9. (E) The Incidental Take authority extended to TRlMARK shall not be any period during which TRlMARK has suspended performance under this SECTION 10. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS This Agreement and each of its rights, obligations, covenants and conditions shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and assigns. 12-12.00 5017-00001 S:\l61 \990900 13.A 1 O. wpd 18 I&ft-a..~ SECTION 11. RECITALS AND EXHIBITS All Recitals and Exhibits of this Agreement are incorporated herein and are part of this Agreement. SECTION 12. ATTORNEYS' FEES If any action at law or equity, including any action for declaratory relief, is brought by any of the Parties against any other Party to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, each Party to the litigation shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. SECTION 13. DUPLICATE ORIGINALS This Agreement may be executed in any number of duplicate originals. A complete original of this Agreement shall be maintained in the official records of each of the Parties. SECTION 14. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS A. Federal Funds (i) Implementation of this Agreement by USFWS is subject to the Anti-Deficiency Act and the availability of appropriated funds. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed by the Parties to require the obligation, appropriation, or expenditure of any money from the U.S. Treasury. The Parties acknowledge that USFWS will not be required under this Agreement to expend any federal agency's appropriated funds unless and until an authorized official of that agency affirmatively acts to commit to such expenditures as evidenced in writing. B. State Funds (i) Implementation of this Agreement by CDFG is subject to the availability of appropriated funds. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed by the Parties to require the obligation, appropriation, or expenditure of any money by the State of California. The Parties acknowledge that CDFG will not be required under this Agreement to expend any State of California agency's appropriated funds unless and until an authorized official of that agency affirmatively acts to commit to such expenditures as evidenced in writing. SECTION 15. NOTICE Any notice permitted or required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally to the persons set forth below or shall be deemed given five (5) days after deposit in the United States mail, certified and postage prepaid, return receipt requested and addressed as follows or at such other address as any Party may from time to time specify to the other Parties in writing: 12-12-00 5017-00001 s:\ 161 \990900 B.A 10.wpd 19 /(P)f-;{'3 NNP - TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC 85 Argonaut Suite 205 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Attn: Stephen Hester THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Chief Administrative Officer 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 209 San Diego, California 92101 THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 4th Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Attn: City Manager U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE 2730 Loker Avenue West Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attn: Field Supervisor CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME 4949 Viewridge San Diego, CA 92123 Attn: MSCP Program Supervisor with a copy to: California Department of Fish & Game Legal Division 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1335 Sacramento, CA 95814 SECTION 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT Except for: (1) the indemnification agreement approved by Resolution of the City of Chula Vista, (2) the indemnification agreement approved by the County of San Diego, and (3) those Donation of Land agreements and Option to Purchase agreement referred to in Paragraph A of Exhibit I to Section 4 of this Agreement, this Agreement supersedes any and all other Agreements, either oral or in writing, among the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and contains all of the covenants and agreements among them with respect to said matters, and each party acknowledges that no representation, inducement, promise or agreement, oral or otherwise, has been made by the other Party or anyone acting on behalf of the other party that is not embodied herein. 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161 \990900 13.AI o. wpd 20 !0/t-C).'-/ SECTION 17. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shaH be governed by and construed in accordance with the ESA, CESA, the NCCP Act and other applicable federal and California laws. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement. Dated: ,2000 CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a By: Title: ,2000 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a political subdivision of the State of California Dated: By: Title: Dated: ,2000 UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the Department ofInterior of the United States of America By: Michael Spear Title: Dated: ,2000 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, a subdivision of the California ResQurces Agency of the State of California By: Title: 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161 \990900 13.A 1 O.wpd 21 I ~fr -).:;- Dated: ,2000 NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC A Delaware limited liability company By: Stephen E. Hester Its: Vice President By: 12-12-00 5017-00001 8:\161 \990900 13.A I O.wpd 22 I ~~-a {; Pursuant to 50 C.F.R. Section 13.25(b), the United States Fish and Wildlife Service finds that the requirements for approving a partial transfer of ITP No. have been met and hereby approves the transfer from the County of San Diego to the City of Chula Vista that part oflTP No. which covers the San Miguel Ranch. United States Fish and Wildlife Service By: Michael Spear Title: Manager, CalifornialNevada Operations Office 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161\990900 13.AlO.wpd 23 1(0,40 "'~I STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ) ) ) ss. On before me, , a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ss. COUNTY OF On before me, , a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) 12-12-00 5017-00001 S:\161\99090013.AIO.wpd 24 l(r;ft-i:A~ COUNTY OF ) ) ) ss. STATE OF CALIFORNIA On before me, , a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ) ) ) ss. On before me, , a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) 12-12-00 50]7-00001 S:\I61\99090013.AIO.wpd 25 /0/-1 ~1 Exhibit 1 Conservation, Mitigation and Impact Minimization Measures to be Implemented by TRIMARK A. CONSERVATION. TRIMARK shall assure the conservation of approximately 346 acres of biologically important habitat located partly on San Miguel Ranch and partly on San Miguel North, respectively, as follows. (i) San Miguel Mitigation Parcel. As soon as practicable after the Effective Date and subject to Section 6(C) of this Agreement, TRIMARK shall cause the transfer, in fee, of approximately 166 acres located in San Miguel North, as depicted on Exhibit F and legally described on Exhibit G (the "San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel") to the United States of America for inclusion in the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge. As of the date that CITY has extended the Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK, the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel shall only be utilized in a manner consistent with conservation purposes and shall be fully accessible to the managers and employees/subcontractors of the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge, who shall be entitled to take any actions they deem appropriate for conservation management. The San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel is not being annexed into CITY at this time; accordingly, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Agreement, CITY shall not be responsible for enforcing this Paragraph A(i). (ii) Eastern Open Space. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, TRIMARK shall enter into a "Donation of Land" agreement with the United States of America covering approximately 101 acres in the eastern portion of San Miguel Ranch, as depicted on Exhibit H (the "Eastern Open Space"). TRIMARK shall restrict its activities in the Eastern Open Space to those consistent with conservation purposes, except that establishment of ajoint pedestrian/equestrian trail in the approximate location shown on the San Miguel Ranch tentative tract map shall be permitted and limited encroachment along the boundary between the Eastern Open Space and development within San Miguel Ranch shall be allowed to address the fact that minor variations from the approved tentative tract map are likely to occur during project construction. Although TRIMARK shall endeavor to keep such encroachments to the minimum practicable, the Parties agree that any encroachments within the area shown as Parcel B-1 and Parcel B-2 in Exhibit H to this Agreement may occur without any further consultation or concurrence by COUNTY, CITY, USFWS or CDFG. Any encroachments into the Eastern Open Space Area beyond those within Parcel B-1 or Parcel B-2 may only occur with the prior concurrence of USFWS, which shall evaluate whether such encroachment has more than a de minimus impact on biological resources. IfUSFWS concurs with such encroachment, TRIMARK shall provide an offsetting amount of undisturbed vegetation (beyond the minimum required to ensure that a total of 181 is preserved within the total of the Eastern, Central and Western Open Space Areas) be contained within the Eastern Open Space. The Donation of Land agreement will also provide for a right of access in favor of the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge's managers, employees and subcontractors that allows them to undertake any actions they deem appropriate for conservation management ofthe Eastern Open Space and will provide for continued access for TRIMARK and its employees and contractors for purposes of fulfilling obligations of TRIM ARK under Section 4 and this Exhibit I. The actual boundaries of the Eastern Open Space area transferred to the United States shall be adjusted to exclude any areas where encroachment occurred consistent with the terms of the Donation of Land agreement and to include areas containing an offsetting amount of undisturbed vegetation. Such "offset" areas shall be selected by TRIMARK in consultation with USFWS and CDFG. Upon completion of the development of San Miguel Ranch, additional natural open space remaining in or adjacentto Parcel 12-12-00 5017-00001 S,\161 \990900 13 ,AI O.wpd 26 /h IJ ' 3 0 B-1 and Parcel B-2 which was not utilized for the development or used as an "offset" area shall be donated to the National Wildlife Refuge System. (iii) Central Open Space. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, TRIMARK shall enter into a "Donation of Land" agreement with the United States of America over approximately 24 acres of in the central portion of San Miguel Ranch, as depicted on Exhibit I and legally described on Exhibit I (the "Central Open Space"). TRIMARK shall restrict its activities in the Central Open Space to those consistent with conservation purposes, except that all parties recognize and acknowledge that a portion of the Central Open Space is already subject to a San Diego Gas & Electric power line easement, and limited encroachment along the boundary between the Central Open Space and development within San Miguel Ranch (including proposed future SR-125) shall be allowed to address the fact that minor variations from the approved tentative tract map are likely during project construction. Although TRIMARK shall endeavor to keep such encroachments to the minimum practicable, the Parties agree that any encroachments within the area shown as Parcel A-I in Exhibit I to this Agreement may occur without any further consultation or concurrence by COUNTY, CITY, USFWS or CDFG. Any encroachments into the Central Open Space Area beyond those within Parcel A-I may only occur with the prior concurrence ofUSFWS, which shall evaluate whether such encroachment has more than a de minimus impact on biological resources. IfUSFWS concurs with such encroachment, TRIMARK shall provide an offsetting amount of undisturbed vegetation (beyond the minimum required to ensure that a total of 181 is preserved within the total of the Eastern, Central and Western Open Space Areas) be contained within the Central Open Space. The Donation of Land agreement will also provide for a right of access in favor the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge's managers, employees and subcontractors that allows them to undertake any actions they deem appropriate for conservation management ofthe Central Open Space and will provide for continued access for TRIMARK and its employees and contractors for purposes of fulfilling obligations ofTRIMARK under Section 4 and this Exhibit 1. The actual boundaries of the Central Open Space area transferred to the United States shall be adjusted to exclude any areas where encroachment occurred consistent with the term of the conservation easement and to include areas containing an offsetting amount of undisturbed vegetation. Such "offset" areas shall be selected by TRIMARK in consultation with USFWS and CDFG. Upon completion of the development of San Miguel Ranch, additional natural open space remaining in or adjacent to Parcel A-I which was not utilized for the development or used as an "offset" area shall be donated to the National Wildlife Refuge System. (iv) Western Open Space. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, TRIMARK shall enter into a "Donation of Land" agreement with the United States of America over approximately 57 acres in the western portion of San Miguel Ranch, as depicted on Exhibit J (the "Western Open Space"). TRIMARK shall restrict its activities in the Western Open Space to those consistent with conservation purposes, except that establishment of a pedestrian trail in the approximate location shown on the San Miguel Ranch tentative tract map shall be permitted and a limited right of encroachment along the boundary between the Western Open Space and development within San Miguel Ranch shall be allowed to address the fact that minor variations from the approved tentative tract map are likely to occur during project construction. Although TRIMARK shall endeavor to keep such encroachments to the minimum practicable, the Parties agree that any encroachments within the areas shown as Parcel C-l, Parcel D-l, Parcel E-l, Parcel E-2, Parcel F -1, and Parcel G-l, in Exhibit J to this Agreement may occur without any further consultation or concurrence by COUNTY, CITY, USFWS or CDFG. Any encroachments into the Western Open Space Area beyond those within Parcel C-l, Parcel D-l, Parcel E-I, Parcel E-2, Parcel F-l and Parcel G-l may only occur with the prior concurrence ofUSFWS, which shall evaluate whether such encroachment has more than a de minimus impact on biological resources. If USFWS concurs with such 12.12-00 5017.00001 s:\ 161 \990900 13.A 1 o. wpd 27 /&;1. 3/ encroachment, TRIMARK shall provide an offsetting amount of undisturbed vegetation (beyond the minimum required to ensure that a total of 181 is preserved within the total of the Eastern, Central and Western Open Space Areas) be contained within the Western Open Space. The Donation of Land agreement will also provide for a right of access in favor the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge's managers, employees and subcontractors that allows them to undertake any actions they deem appropriate for conservation management of the Western Open Space and will provide for continued access for TRIMARK and its employees and contractors for purposes of fulfilling obligations ofTRIMARK under Section 4 and this Exhibit 1. The actual boundaries of the Western Open Space area transferred to the United States shall be adjusted to exclude any areas where encroachment occurred consistent with the terms of the Donation of Land agreement and to include areas containing an offsetting amount of undisturbed vegetation originally outside the boundaries the Western Open Space. Such "offset" areas shall be selected by TRIMARK in consultation with USFWS and CDFG. Upon completion of the development of San Miguel Ranch, additional natural open space remaining in or adjacent to Parcel C-l, Parcel D-l, Parcel E-l, Parcel E-2, Parcel F-l and Parcel G-l which was not utilized for the development or used as an "offset" area shall be donated to the National Wildlife Refuge System. (v) Additional Tarplant Acreage. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, TRlMARK shall enter into an Option to Purchase agreement with the United States of America covering approximately 5.174 acres adjacent to the Western Open Space Area of San Miguel Ranch, as depicted on Exhibit K and legally described on Exhibit K (the "Additional Tarplant Acreage"). The Option to Purchase agreement shall have an initial term offive (5) years and shall allow for two automatic five (5) year extensions. If, at the end of fifteen (15) years, the USFWS, despite its best efforts to secure funding to exercise its acquisition rights under the Option Purchase agreement and despite CDFG's best efforts to secure funding for the same, has failed to acquire the Additional Tarplant Acreage, TRlMARK shall enter into a Donation of Land agreement with the United States of America, thereby ensuring that the Additional Tarplant Acreage is preserved in perpetuity. The Option to Purchase Agreement will also provide a right of access in favor ofthe San Diego National Wildlife Refuge's managers, employees and subcontractors that allows them to undertake actions they deem appropriate for conservation management ofthe Additional Tarplant Acreage during this interim phase. (vi) Funding for Management Efforts. Concurrent with issuance of a grading permit for all areas of San Miguel Ranch east of proposed SR-125, TRIMARK shall deposit $190,000 into a National Fish and Wildlife Foundation account identified by USFWS. One year from the date a grading permit is issued, TRlMARK shall deposit an additional $190,000 in the same account. Said funds are to be used only for management efforts within the areas described in Paragraphs A(ii) through (v) of this Exhibit I, and primarily for the management of the Otay tarplant. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, TRlMARK shall post a performance bond in the amount of$190,000 in favor of CITY to ensure that funding will be available to meet TRIMARK's obligation to provide the second and final payment of$190,000 to the NFWF account one year after the first grading permit is issued. (vii) The Parties acknowledge that the utilization of approximate acreages in Paragraphs A(ii)-(iv) above is intended to reflect the fact that TRlMARK's true obligation is to ensure that at least a minimum of 169 acres, plus an additional approximately 12 acres, is to be provided collectively within the Eastern, Central and Western Open Space Areas, which distribution ensures that the original 37 -acre tarplant preserve areas are preserved and which additional 12 acres constitute added areas of actual and potential tarplant habitat in the Western Open Space Area consisting of existing approved residential development. Therefore, the Parties acknowledge that 12-12.00 5017-00001 S:\161\99090013.A10.wpd 28 /t 11- 3,).- the final acreages used in the Donation of Lands agreements may vary, as long as these basic principles are followed. (viii) TRIMARK shall construct and maintain the two trails identified in Paragraph A(ii) and (iv) of this Exhibit and shall construct (but not be responsible for maintaining) the associated fencing for such trails. B. MITIGATION. In addition to the conservation measures in Section 4.A. above, TRIMARK has undertaken or will undertake the following mitigation for anticipated biological impacts: (i) Seed Collection. TRIMARK has caused its biological consultants to collect seed from a substantial number of Otay tarplants within the San Miguel Ranch development footprint. Approximately half of the seed is being held by the Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Gardens, and half is being held by TRIMARK's biological consultant. Except for a small amount of seed reserved for the use of the Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Gardens, the collected seed shall be made available to managers, employees and subcontractors ofthe San Diego National Wildlife Refuge for use in their conservation management activities. (ii) Barrel Cactus Relocation. TRIMARK is in the process of implementing a San Diego barrel cactus salvage and transplant program to ensure that all cactus over one (1) inch crown in diameter within the San Miguel Ranch development footprint are salvaged and transplanted. TRIMARK shall complete implementation of the cactus salvage and transplant program in accordance with the San Diego Barrel Cactus Translocation Plan for San Miguel Ranch South substantially in the form as attached as Exhibit L hereto. No San Diego barrel cactus designated for salvage shall be impacted by development grading. (iii) Wetland Creation/Enhancement. TRIMARK shall implement a wetland creation/enhancement program within open space on San Miguel Ranch in accordance with the Mitigation and Monitoring Program (dated October 26, 2000) submitted to CITY, CDFG and United States Army Corps of Engineers. (iv) Revegetation of Roadway Slopes. TRIMARK has incorporated into its Master Landscape Plan the planting of coastal sage scrub in appropriate locations along roadway slopes and will implement such revegetation efforts in accordance with the Master Landscape Plan. (v) Initial Fence Establishment. TRIMARK shall provide construction fencing to separate between grading areas and open space areas referenced in Paragraph A(ii)-(v) herein. TRIMARK shall install the permanent fencing along the borders of the lands described in Paragraph A(ii) - (v) herein in accordance with the San Miguel Ranch South Open Space Preserve Fencing Plan substantially in the form as attached as Exhibit M hereto. TRIMARK shall not be responsible for maintaining, monitoring, repairing or replacing this fencing. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, TRIMARK shall post a performance bond in the amount of$190,000 in favor of CITY to ensure that funding will be available to meet TRIMARK's obligation to install the permanent fencing. C. IMPACT MINIMIZATION. In addition to the conservation measures set forth in Paragraph A above and the mitigation measures set forth in Paragraph B above, TRIMARK shall undertake the following measures to minimize biological impacts: 12-12.00 50 1 7.{)000 1 S:\I61 \990900 13.A 1 O. wpd 29 ;0// 3.3 (i) Use of Non-Invasive Plant Species. TRlMARK shall utilize non-invasive plants in landscaping areas outside of actual lot boundaries for all areas bordering the Eastern, Central and Western Open Space Areas. TRIMARK will not utilize iceplant in lieu of fire-resistant native plant species. TRIMARK shall arrange for the homeowners' association(s) within San Miguel Ranch to provide an informational packet to new homeowners: (I) encouraging them to use non-invasive plant species in their landscaping adjacent to the natural open space areas described in Paragraph A(ii)-(v) hereto, and (2) explaining the detrimental effects of the Argentine ant on species in the natural open space areas and recommending measures for eradicating this ant species from residential properties. (ii) TRIMARK shall ensure that the residential community CC&R's will prohibit the use of invasive ornamental plant species on slopes adjacent to the open space areas referenced in Paragraph (A)(ii)-(v) herein. (iii) TRlMARK shall ensure that the managing entity for the open space areas referenced in Paragraph A(ii)-(v) herein is granted an easement within the adjacent slopes for the purpose of removing those invasive species which are prohibited from being planted under the CC&R's referenced in Paragraph qii) herein. TRIMARK shall provide access to CITY necessary for CITY to enforce the provisions of Section 4 and pursuant to Condition J(I) of the COUNTY MSCP ITP. (iv) TRIMARK shall conduct its initial clearing and grubbing activities with a biological monitor present to ensure grading limits are adhered to, and shall not clear vegetation within 500 feet of any occupied coastal California gnatcatcher nest during the breeding season (March I-August 15) unless agreed to in writing by USFWS. (v) Equipment Staging, Fencing. TRIMARK shall restrict site preparation activities, especially staging area operations and maintenance rows for heavy machinery, to areas within the development footprint. All areas adjacent to conserved lands shall be fenced prior to conducting any adjacent surface disturbing activities. TRIMARK shall install a debris fence prior to excavation in areas where grading is up-slope of conserved lands. 12.12-{)0 5017-00001 8:\161 \990900 13.A I O. wpd 30 /0/1 3 u .,. 91 @l\ ~ " ;'- > 0 9I ~O ~Z:f O<~ '0:0 o !!= z ;i lL..Jo <l:W-i ~ to f-:J> Ofl"i:S <V;' a:_~ ~~~ > ~ f-Zo g< 1lJ(f) f- j ! , ; I i.JI ~ i t-,,!.- . j ,.!tl!! 11.2i:<1:li~:I_, Ct.... .~ I- - " . I 'I' i .hHi:.: l~m,hIoH I l'"h~...ufi_!......h"~ ~ " Iii / i . 2 ,~ . !t;:;; I!:!:! I ,ttril I I I , I j 'i .. I--=:!r-::Z-..Il : 1,1 r.:,- I.... . .' I ~ I! ~. 1. , ( I ! I -- --- $ . ~:' ~ ~ i: ;.,fi .:---:~.: .1 "1J]~. r:= ,': L: I~ i~ riil\ IL ~:. .:11;----=-.. 1~ Jft: I I , I . L~ "" I" I .J -"1 -. ~ :,,'- ii ::' d'l ..r--. r ~~I ~I.::" ~. .j! ;- '~ .. I ~i~ : . ~ I II ~~'~i ~.: 1{~'!;' !I~" I \ +rr'l~ 'i 'I.' tl -, I ~ . ~ ;: - ~'...: ~i :'. i ~ </__,.J :iI 2.~ it ~ ~~~. Ii , ~ !I !~-: +-: 'i" ~l fr I Ii .1 Ill! 'I" I:I! I";" l~l.I:1 ,,!I-i. 1!' ~J:: /6/J ~:! I.. I I !l' i l~ :i.' . il " ":i;ii1i;;;I... . I C' I n I ;: ill III . i; fll', I ~IJlf"JI~ i : - ~ <e ~ : ,JI. 'I 0< I . ,- tl: I ",' ~.~ 11,,,,:1 ~ J ~\ ,,": - , ., s i~. 'to; ;. '1:1 ~; ':....~: , .J.. '2 i1 ' t" }";' ~.. .' . \. :'.' ~ I.. ~!, \: U' ,'. lot It I l'I'II-}~ t" ; t- H" '" .... ',,'1'.\ '" Z I , '-" '1"1 . t ;,!U I ;: '"J" ..... "I i ", '. ,"I: n 'I' I" ~ 'Ii -11 <. ti', I . , Ill:;; il i'l !~j g" I,; I!i ! ;., !:~ J:;: ~;~"'!' i ~;; <( ; I !.. lil!!1 I i'if I :i~ ~:I ! '!I ~~;; illllllltl (.) a ~ I .' 'l'I~1 ~ i: !l iI hit ~C~ : II~: 'W,! 'i ~III_~! ~ ~ S . . Iii !II~' I .! !! I"JI rt! ;; 111::.1 :iiU 1!14_-!"'!-!.,-l I-OW~ ; 1!i!i~~:,~I',~i,!.I~n~!';IH..iiljill~ ~i! .j,.j ~Sa!: j'!II"I"III"'I'lhp: 1',1 'Ii': CD 1'1' ii!I"il tz....<"<(~~' .1 II!. J... ..,ItUI.ii.rni; . ., . ." . ., . , I (fJ " lid ..\. P 'I ,l, , I ; II ';~i i'i,I~! J:' i Iii I :o:!h i ill I , ":;; !! : llill",!r ~i~, ml m Il!1 !, ','; ~!I!! Ii ~~~i~ i I:~ II 11 0 :: ! :l~; ,i'I!t! !i:l'll~ ~l!! fl',':i, 'l.,i !!~,g !!.. i: ~~ ~ Ii. !::!: , "! " ":' c! or. .1 I I-I:, '",I', 5~.1 ~ 'f it.n ~ 1" - ".i'1il,';!!!r"!"!"j.. -:1.,,' ,'~hil'I-.!" 'I- i I" i ;Il~ Ill'l rtt" .r ~l j.a I,.,.. .1' I r 'I ~~ I 1...'":1 il LLJ I !Il Hli 1i'!i 11m;!! lIh !i!i II::! ill! I~~!l !i ::~ ;i liill :, i1i frl I ~ 'l'.n!I'. 1'1; " I,ll r ."',, I"i!' il 'l~ '/lli!: I' "I ~! ! ~~; !,::i J!m!iJ .n. ~II i~1 ~ a !;I:~d fi ~ilri !t ;~I Ii ii Ct: ~ ,"., .. ". ". ". :-j)1 :~ il'l,j;P',iii ~.l i.~fi; ~t .'. ;.o..! .~. I;? t~h~! ,~; 'j'll"!!'l! 11: ;i!~1: 'I' l;i!:I b~ 1!!lilll'j'!! h;l\>:.l'i iliil....'i'. 1,1;!n~lill ~i. ......! l.il , , . ~ ~ z - z z :5 CL. ro o LW w.. I l . I ! , .1 . ~: H++:~.H+:,,: -H--I 'i.i'!'1 I :i! 'Ii' :' I:! Ii U~i .: "fl.. II .:.u~ "~ Itl..~l' h!;!:.;! ~;h!~!i i~: ;! tJ I . , !:'\ : i' .1 II '-- I ~\1-",ili '. ' 't l" II'W.-i i I~r-i " ; -5" ," " , 1 I, Ilh; :i:"1;-.y, . .,..,=Ili i ~il i.. 5-".': ~, 2'-- ;:;-- I' . '~l i; oj . r . I e=llio I _ I " 'J Q l ; : j J ' I ' "I ttl.I.::!I~o!l':"! l!:ir.. iPt== I llil I fi 1 j: 1 1"+: -'-', ! I I Ii J.t r I ~ I' ' I I; I" 11;!551~l!lilill:' ,J! II ,.1 H: I! ! J .1: itlft!! ~. 111. ::.!; 1 Iii! _ ,i'!!dlni!:;~f!~J 1i""I~ll'!:!i , 'Ill )~ii ~i . ~!h li~vl ~I'" i',. 5; , :~~f. !!I. 11 . ~ . il"= . j~ ~ ~~5: jit ('~ J ij. ~ J. r ~ i " . ~ ~ . ~, A. I- I i! I ! / i --' i~ '. ~l ,I:' ~...- . 1",~,i 1;~IU. ....! II ,- ...........'" ~. ( : I : i ~-- , , .. . i. ~: k I I :i~ .... ....--i-,--_..// i! -, !:; ---. . ' ,i'- .......,J.--_._-- .. 7--.....' , d ;". . , "'-"k '? c:::- , ' -\,.-' --:.' " -~. iFI;:' . ';j ,. ~ll-:Iii '; ~ ' '. ~~, ,ucomu.--J :!' !l;: ,.,' . . --~-1--:;- rt~tk~. __~_ ,e<t> ~:;;;;-r..==:....t ! _____--.;;-'~ \! J; I" ...----/ ,; ,; I:, '1 " I : H n .. .; - ,.;' ",.... ..., ' ~.., I <I .. .. ., .;' ',"" ,,'" ~j' ' ! ;1"" ,,; i' ., ,il'~' l;'" .~. ;, . u i; I "i; '! ,J l. ,) .1' :'" 01, :i "~I i t' ,~.~ 1 ;1 ! ~t: !~ "..' .,..'i,:"I:"';' ......,.., ",', ,. ,II" III ~; ,it i :: ;: i~ ,'; ;L, ;1 iI" ;:, j, 1: j , :. ill! I li.':;:d I::!".'" I .... ", ,.,' ',' "" ..,' ,..I!""" 9: ;~ j; ~ j! i! ~ !l ~i }! j" il.j ,I; ;: :i; :. ,. ",:,,"" Ii " ,I :, ,: , ., ,.11 ""., 'i ~ ",. ;.' .,.' ,'" ,,I"" .j ,. ~ h lJ ! ~.I: !'j '1'1;; ji j, ,; II ;;, ,; :;.!:' i: il:1 jl ':;! Ii " 'j /:: ~~ j! ~ .' . 1; J. ;i Jl it.; t~. !I ~,~. ~~.~ .~., J" :l ai I~ ,: I, ~'I ! " :' ;1 ,_ .' ~. l' I! .,.'~ !:l . ..!l i~ 'j ,"i!}.i..;. '" .~ ;~ ~. . .,.."" .': ,."., '.... ,"j' ,. . ..... ~ ~fl: I. ~ :~ fP! .. ,. i: ,I il ill j' !: II :' p. j' ,; .' ., ~: .. !, jl ~ ;1" H !l,: I' i' 1 'i;! i' 1~ tl :,'; ,I 1.;; l~ tn .! ji i~ lil'dij~ .;1 ~ i U inHI !I !i IPH,i ;: ia! r" ;,1 ;. .! :i :jl ii ;1: ,., i' !1 q ,~ 31 ~ . Ii I.; _ ~I !I' .i: t~. J~ I" r '.1 '. % I I 11'~ i.' o a . e ' '" ,il iu ;il ,. " ,i h. Ii " ,.l' ;. 'I ., I': " 0 e eo. " ,. ;1 il. ;j!I 'I'." it Ij li J~I . ... .,.,' .,,; ;.i.;ili; .., ~ l: I:J i3l It * c;. ; -- . ,i I j. " 5- ~ '.0 '-7 '.....~( -..=- ,':! ....J__~......l . . , " - -. . il' : "-. <{I _.~ :. . H7i / I h l~ .lm;"''ll9iI",::!ii :b ~ II I-~ ni' '- I I" -",1 . I , "~ i; '.v : 11 _-I :.I',;,.F "- ' ..... '.._.r~, --T------i A .., "-:"\ II I~ . ~ :~...~ l .. .-.- '.' /.,-:.11 !~ 1 !~! ~ / II ~"i~. ,,- iOC. . i . i I. . ., . I I ',. '~~," ________- ., i '.1 ::- ~! <. 1 i I ~ !i I' ~ ~ ",' o I' 11 h H!j .. '1'" 1 .,!:,',j' i',' . ' 1;1!' i'l!! I!';' : 'i I::' ~ ,:'; 11' ,I ",.. ". I ' I. ' ,~, .. ", ;1:; ;:j!; :i>' ,:; ii i' :::::::~: ,.' I,"l' .,"1;'. .......... I"i';'!"")' 1 1 ""11.'11 :".....';. I~: i: ',jl1ml..... ..' , ::,' :'::'~ :::::::: ::; "I il.......;I...:.."...,...,......... i""!':!' ..::::..;,: ! I ~i i~ j::Hmll;'!~{~~~~~!!!J!!~i!j:!!mili:iii;iii ~::: il" !; 1,: d:: ;~:i: I ,; ~i ;lH"" !!!!!;!!mi!!;;;;,ii;~l~):;';~;.;.;;; ;:., j;.. !I' , ;~!;:::!~i-:~ . . ........!!!!!!!!!'I;il;; Iii' "1111 LIf:,",ii~ii'~:: mh'. f:.) ,~.. Iii !~n..j:~I~fI:fi ~' ~. J.: ~~"''''''dn.;:. :f1,,=.Y! ~ ~ :.:.~ Iii '7-'J ' t, tl' =":; ~~ ., ~l' ...l .. , ' -~ ..: -----; i; ./' j ~ ~-,'., . '!i' h-..l :....~ ~ .~, ~ ! =1.;, l>~' ,- 'I ~ ~ ~i J ~~ ...l-:\ ~ 'l . ~ & -~ ~ ~~ [~' -::: _I ~ .".1 PlII!i W ~ ~ . .'j --.-';'j-'- j r ~ .:. ' ., .1 ~E) :l~ ! ~ ~ ~. it t": ~l ;:, ,. ; t i; ,~. i( ~:. I . . ~~ h! ,.1 ,.. I : I It :., i=~ .! ~ i.. 1 .; 'i! i!t I!" h:! ; J; "lliii I" j J'-! .!U ~: .il' 'e 'It:. ;... Jh "t ~ II' I.i ,iii ~It ~,.. ," . ~n I) !,..- ; i." Ii" hJH :,l Ol)! i 1 ~~ I: 1~ r:ii Ii r" ~ ,. ;1 ..I.! J If ,! . 1 ~to ;! i ~ !! 'fl" r;: " ... !: : ~- '. ~ . ~ I ~!! . w" Jf ~. jl ~ 3 ~~ ~: I · J ! -V il': _~ It' !~ .~J ._ II-' ,I r........: ~~ _to oil....' ~-. ~~, .... ~ / !~. l; "! . /b ll:;,--j.. .!...-..1!.1 -"- Il'.f. _ 0 <" !!1 g lrl '" ~ ~ -;. ',.1>. , ',,~..' Yr- ~... z, < E:('\l!lCOI '" . ~ I ft o..U ! "'z' ~ ;:<tj ~ ~5~ z ~WJ ~ I!;!::l. w ~C!Jo ill !Z::;;~ !2 !"zS w <( g> UJ I '" ~ o l'l i;: j!1 ~.: I' II Iii '1 ~ . ',,"-'\ ;; , ;;; =-..~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I' ; l- ,ll = \\.~I' ! ~" . .- ~ 7T-.:o1~~ ' ".! ,I f ~ i::l h .. jl iii / i'" ~ , I !i Ii! .- ,.r: 1!1i iHi _.~.. .' , E 'I i I: " .. ! .. \ ;i ,. , " .. U ~ I I :~ , il ..~:~;::::. ilIMl!ltO -"- ..Cl "z' "<8 t;a:~ " -,0 fOwl ~a~ !z=<. wzS 1-< en I .; ~ ~ 'it i 1: i; ~ j! ~? 'J . ~ I. w I . I ~i'1 w' ~, ~' ~1. ~i,; s 'ON E3H5 335 I I I I I . I , I : I g i I ! ! ." ..' .. . ' .:~::.'.'~' \?:._:~./'l -::. ...;:&::','.)' ,;.-~:~" ;;~[~!;,~~~~~~n \ ~.J ; .\ . _.~,.'~:~'~..,:,.',r':, --..-'-'5:: .'.1.....,- '.... .-~..~::-.., \". .' ,',- .~~ ~--". -"--'I~~'" , . - -~.;;.:- ..,," ~.__.;:;~..,'i:::: ,:--..;< . ~li!11 .. '.' ilil .,....;;:..-... .-~. - ..._,:.~~'~:;::-'l-:i.~' ~__~:~\,'::~:;'..i&.l-'-1 ::" ..~-:-- ..:,~-:.':'--' '<>-. q- - :'':'~~'.' ,~/ .' \ >.~\.~I~~ ';.~~ Jtii I"-! II ~i: uil 'iii -~~.. I' ji .:..--~ . ~,". ! ~it~I_~~L',. " . 'j\jL', , . - i:!:v ;i -' \,-/-- .. '" IIi ~. , , , , '} ~=-:~ r----~-R:-- i ~ . \ . I - .;e. ~ ".. .~ ~.~ ~. .,1 ',,'oJ:', . " ;l(;~"~;:~:-"': ;:~,., ;., I r,;1;~[ .. ..:"_,/.\ ~..: .;....~..' ,i' r: 1"' Ii" ";-'r~ Ii:. "//'/~?~' 'i ,,,'i~i! i!q~~'~ F, .: ,,?J.~k~.*,'~-' ~ ~i j,~!' ",~"'" R' -fi~ a ,I /)F-' 37 "ON 133HS !""~lDI I , I ..u ""z~. ;:<(~ "c:. "" --,0 Cl:W. ~:;)~ ~C!J~ !z::;:. WZS" 1-<( en tl .~ii!o .:,,11 11'11 ~"i~ .... ','. ~~_~-i:r~t ~ -~~" ,em -=- - ,:. ,.-. ~j"'), =--:=. i~~ S? ~.'ds --' --- -_..-- --- ""p\&'",",tOI' ~.ocot: iJ. ""f al~ '~!Ilj 6~. :_"11-: il\i"- - .l.l~~ . =~>:I /, ,,., ./ _:."'f- , ,~ .... :( .~' ..{ ~<~'>:--,>, :,' '. - ::-.....~. ~~~~ :.::~ ~~. li~~: ;, !," l~ .; ;1-"; t 'I ='--I''iI 1. :l '--.,,," '-.','_._ 'In I /I\"';....--,~ I;: ,. 'I 'j; .t 1& ,......)' ,...-' . 1\'-'--'11/ ri-\\;;!f":.-.;' ,6'l .:~ Ii=.:,! - ~!:"'..4 .~~-""-~: _'" lH~ ~ d~~,;..~i:~" ,..::....Jr~ ~: ';:r rlrr?T}.-i~njlif~~", -~-;:~.~'i(:... '.....-\- ~ "-, ~-"'~.\(_r.;.:'?:_,. ,;l...1,_.,l'~.+I', 10":' ,:.~ of_=- ~_'~ -~~::'- N' .~ -- i~~ '';-:~=T'- , S:J~~ ~ - -- - l -.:: ...'{1~ ~::.=---'~9~ ,C'lI . . '~1:t:i I "j n. II' ., l!1l 11'1 I', III ~ .,,: .,'.' -\- ~. 1\ lId:;:; '~w " :I: ., 1 ;.; t HJ .\' ',: \\ I:, " .:~~i<.<: ---:...... . ::'.... ~:'.' 'I ~ . ~. ......"i ;, ; .::.1,'. ~' - " . ".;: >', .~'- ~ ~ .",. ;".-.';'" , ,t' ~, e < ..:fr-.:: 16~ 39 lilO~a:J . :r: 0.0 <z. "<:~ tJa:;3 <-,. I"wj ~ffig g:::<~ wzS 1-<: en E,! I , ~1!H II!II .... ci z '" -----~--. , _~;w' ! '.""'" I ! :r: u ~z. "c(o >-cr:~ " ~ <--" l"wj w~. ~C9S <:;:- ffiz5 >-c( en ~ ''-2t- -"':: 1- ~:.. :'f : .j !, :I.: 'v '. .r .", ....... , 'i , ~~ ~ ~.11 :f, I ." II, I!I 'I' Ii' II'! 1111 II! .. . ~. I ~iI iil !i;il ~ - '- ~~-_. -~.~---~-. -'---~'- ---'- ~--. .._----,.---~-- ._- --~. :J::;: .._~~ ~<. -- '-, -., .. ".--,,; . ~.. .,.,:' "' ... , , I ~ ~ i ~ I, n "'-'I' ~1 " ;1 , , r ,I "f " , !,. :sf';~, ~;-, ~", =~':n&.::;:' ~ , , "C') "~I :rl,.. --"(1)~!v.:. 0", , "-' '" , o z >- "' "' ~ en ..... "' "' en .' - _. .. :~ ,j .~.. I , ,,:~~,:';-''':"'!. ..'" ;.., "".... ,-,,',.. '.. ~"";" '~ . '~ o . , , r "'. I ........ j "" ". ,. ", ...,.~. ;!~ ~l! :ltj ..,;',...;;;;........ , . .------,.-~ '-.--.--.-------. , I I i I I -+ ,- . -!. t------- , I I ~ "::: ~;tj;;;< .''', .:... :"'"...-....--. . \~~'~: "_~ _ ~_:...' ,", '>-01".. f: -c,dm _ ~c:-"::-'~ .~<L.. ~,..~~ -----------~~~~~~~~~ 1',,::': '.., ,~.~.~, ...-.~.-,?,..'.~;.':~'.... -i;"'< " t " ._~' '-J :'." H :~.' H:, -':1' ~' ~ ~,''', '.- .. '- ~I ':~! . '. ,.:.,..._"".._ _' :0- , _.~~::?~~r~;} '/' ....L..,ft;~1f~t:',.,.,. ,'.'~. :=.=: ============~~~:~~~l ....'...:-e.. ....c/-:. :/: ,. \oc,.;.!r,.:{ ./7 ,'_ ,.-.-, - . /,,""-. - '-. ".", .:/' ".-'::~ ;I!/ "::..f.. '" IIf 1// '" II, '" '" .., ill- :.:t.~,. ". '- ." " " """ "., " o '. -~' ':.~ /}' ," " :,/, .:-/~" ,'. .. -.'-. ..' ';~1::5\>::.ff!.. ~ .. : " '. ,- '. ','," : I . .,......,-..,: '."'" '.I ~,'-'~ ...~:'~~~. ~;::~;_:~"""'-'" :,' ..;;.~'~.,.;:>::-;~' ~ . - r" :__...... , I I 'S , ~ "--~ --{~ ~-- -...<,:.... .i~ ,-r .: 'r ,/l ,,' -/' " ,.'. " , I '! r::~ _ _ i..- " 't, < :;j > . ~ f' ,:,'::,,;: ..-.-.....: , .~:<l,:' .,1 ,':.) .~2c;~~)'. l':"" ._ . -"It- ,'~_., itl .,:'- w:.. ~ ~, ~ /',.0 I ...,.... ~,> :.'~L7~f~i.i;'r{"',:,;~~,t...;:,:! ~~ :'l ~,~ ~,._"':t ,'''.:c.- .=_.__ -=- t': ":. ~'ia~' ':---:--:"-""'l':;:"~-'-' ----.- ~4_. ....:. BQq....lID>tiJ; - ". ~ .~ - - - - - ~.~~= ==, =, ~ .~eF~~~,~"~~~;:.:::'\~~-:-~~f:~T~.:.~~~~: }":':~~;l':---"" -'.i. "ii' --_..:.,~---- -..,.~ /0 17 1:. I if'-.~CC . :r: ..() "'z. "<j ba:~ ~-!. >-wi W:::li i'OCl6 g::;;~ ~z5 < U) .. I eai ", . ;~, Iii !i!il "' ci z >- w w :I: III w W III ii1iillillIJ\( I! 1[lli 1I'III'lil!i!!l'\ \\\111 II J'I"ill' J 111'111'1'" MIl "".1'1" " Id,,,,!'I'I! " 'il'II\'I' i i I ,,!!!!~lil,IIlII!!iliJ~! 1.111 11~1~1lI11!'l! ,III\lim:illllllllll!!!11111111111 : I II ~ I I 'iii II ill II: II ~!l!i..~ .~... ~~ r:, J... ..). .1~1~1'. J. ..I.J1l!..!.) 'I~ ~. '!~I~' I!, 1II111J1I1lI11t1 J J J 1\l111111I11IJ~1 J 1.IiIIIlllI11lIilll1lilt!\Ji!illJ:J!I!I~1I J!I!~I.I J l~ I j ~ I': Ie,j Ii I 1111!1 'lll\111111 l'l 1II1 :;i * ,I:: ::: ',! i. I IIII ! II llll! I:. ! !". 1"1 , lll!p r .j'l' I! hi' . .- t: t;. .. H I I... ./1 .., /, '.' ,"- If'" " ~ co ~ c i J: ! 0..0 i <z- I >- ~<:j I ~ oc:~ ::E ~-l.. i " ....w~ ~ ~:;:). ~ ~ i=CJi I o <_u ....l !z::::ii:c wz5 ......: en ~. . ~~i h' ..".1 111/1 12/12/00 TUE 14:11 FAX 619 560 5465 +H BElVITr MAGUIRE 141 007 e. .. 3.:",- . . . ......~ Ole A San Miguel Ranch Project Vicinity Map Source: usGS 7.5' Jamul Mountains and National City, CA. Quadrangles / 11 4'::- ... 0 600 1IlOO _ - Plants San Diego thom-mint Shaw's agave San Diego ambrosia Aphanisma Del Mar ,":I"'~"ila Clay lIWIZaMa Coastal dunes miIIc vetch Encinitas bacclwis Nevin's barberry Thread-leaved brodiaea Crcw's brodiaea Deose reed gnss Dunn's mariposa lily Slender-pod jewelflower Lakeside ceanothw Wan-Stemmed ceanothus Salt manh bird's-beak Orcw's bird's-beak Del Mar Mesa sand aster T ccate cypress Shon-leaved dudleya Variegated dudleya Sticky dudle~.. Palmer's ericlmeria San Diego butlon-cele:y Coast wallflower San Diego barrel cactw Clay rarplant Hean-leaved pitcher sage Gandet's pitcher sage NuaalJ's lotW Felt-leaved mOlW'della Willowy molW'della San Diego goldenslal' PrOSlrale navam:lia Dehesa bear-grass Snake cbolla California Orcun grass T orny pine San Diego mesa mint Clay Mesa mint Small leaved rose San Miguel savory Gander's bwerweed Narrow-leaved nightshade Parry's tencoccw EXHIBIT MSCP COVERED SPECIES LIST. Animals Salt marsh skipper bUllerfly Thorne's bairstrW bulIcrfIy Rivmide fairy shrimp San Diego fairy shrimp Arroyo soutbwestml road Califomia M-Ieged frog Solttbweslml poIId lIInIe San Diego homed Iiz:Inl . Orange-throated wbiptail California brown pelican Reddish egret White-faced ibis Canada goose Bald eagle Nonhetn harrier Cooper's hawk Swamson's hawk F muginous hawk Golden eagle American petegrine falcon light-footed clapper nil Western snowy plover MOUDlain plovet Long-billed curlew California least ten> Elegant tern Wmern burrowing owl SolttbWeStetn willow flycatcher Coam! caaus wreII Coam! California JIWCIldter Westetn bluebird LeaSt Bell's vireo Ca1ifornia NfoltS-crowDed spaITOW Belding's savmmah sp..,uw Large-billed savazmah spanvw Tricolored blaclcbird American badger MoumaiD lion Solttbern IIltIIe deer I I 000157 OCT 2297 EXHIBIT L /(1/1 ., "i. . 11/30/2000 16: 28 I{"'~ 'f '~::~ ._ I. ~ FAX 7604319624 US FISH AND WILDLIFE SVC ~002 DEPAff'l'MiEHT OF THE INTERIOR U.s, ASH AHa Wlt..DUFE SEfMCE Go - ..... ""'IH) . . 2. -AUTHORITY. AlUTES 16 USC'668-668d 16 USC 703-71~ 16 USC 1533(d 16 USC 1539(a REGULA nONS tA"~ 50 CFR 17.22 50 CFR 17.27 50 CFR 17.32 , ) FEDERAL ASH AND WILDLIFE PERMIT " t. PERMITTEE ~. ;:--.1",,::, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SAN DI~, CA 92101-2472 3. NUMBER . PRT-84 ' 14 4. RENEWABLE . IXJYES DNa .. EFRCflVE 3/17/1998 5. MAY copy I[) YES DNa 17. ~XPIRES i 3/16/2048 .. NAME AND tm.E OF PRINCIPAl.. OFFICER tit, f if . ~J Lawrence B. Prior, III, Chief Administrative Officer .. TYPE Of PERMn' Endangered/Threatened Species 'IG. LOCA'nON WHERE ALlTHORIZED AC'T1Yn1' MAY BE CONDUCTED All land within the County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program Subarea PI delineated on Figure 1.1 of the Count,y Subarea Plan, excluding the MSCP "Cornerstone Lan owned by the City of San, Diego (see MSCP Plan for descriptioR of the Cornerstone Lands). n s" '1. CONDI11ONS MD AUTHORIZATIONS: ... GENERAL CONDmoHS SET OUT IN SU8PaUIT 0 OF sa CFR 13. AND SPE.CIFIC CONomoNS CONTAINED IN FEOE.RAL REGUUOOHS atED IN BLDCK .2 ABOVL ARE MERElY MADE " PART Of nas .ERIII1. AlL ACfIYmes AUTttORaED HEREUiI MUST 8E CARRIED OUT IN ACCORD wmi AND FOR THE PURPOSES DESCRIBED" THE APPUCo1l11ON sueUITTm. CON11ffUEO YAUDfT"(. OR RENEWAL. Of TlilS PERMIT IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETE AND nMELY COMPlJANCE wmt AU.. APPLICABLE ~B. INCLUDINQ THE FlUNG OF AU. ReQUIRED ,!"OAMATfOfl1 AND RtPoRTS. a. THE VAUIX1'Y OF 'netS PERMIT IS ALSO COtIDmONED UPON ImlCl" OBSERVANCE OF ALL APPUCABLE fOREIGN. STATE. LOCAL OR OTHER FEO~AL lAW. .VAI.4J FOR USE IIY PERMITTEE ......ED ABOVE. D. Further conditions of authorization are contained in the attached Special Terms and Conditions. / t~ , -. . $.:' """ '-" <0 " ;" .... M.::-~ o II'ODlllONAL CONomoHS ANa AUntOAIZII11ONS ON REVERSE AlSO APPLY .2. REPORnNG REOUIREMENTS ISSl/EIIBY Regional Director I \JRIGINAL /~1 !~:- . EXHIBIT _D . 11/30/2000 16:28 FAX 7604319624 US FI&H AND WILDLIFE SVC raJ003 ; . \.....J' U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, PORTLAND, OREGON SPECIAL lERMS AND CONDmONS FOR PERMIT PRT-840414 D. AU sections of Title SO Codeo/Federal Regulations, parts 13, 17.22, and 17.32 are conditions of~ permit (copies attached). E. The authorization granted by this permit is subject to compliance with, and implementation of; the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Pian. County of San Diego Subarea Pian. and Implementing Agreement executed by the County of San Diego, California Department ofFish and Game, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, all ofwhicli are hereby incorporated into the permit F. Permit Coverage Dependent Solely on the County or San Diego Subarea Plan: \.....J The permittee and agents designated by the permittee are authorized to take 82 species on the attached ''List of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take," to the extent that take of these species would otherwise be prohibited under Section 9 of the Endangered Species. Act of1973, as lIIpended (Act), and its implementing re~tions, or pursuant to a rule promulgated under section 4( d) of the Act. (See condition G for other covered species.) For each Covered Species Subject to.Incidental Take which is not listed as threatenec;l or endangered under the Act, the Section 10(a) permit will become effective with respect to such species concurrent with the listing of the species as threatened or endangered under the Act, to the extent that their take is prohibited by the Act Take must be incidental to otherwise lawful activities associated with urban growth as . described in the MSCP Plan and County of San Diego Subarea Pian. and as conditioned herein. The amount and nature of the take (e.g. harass, or harm due to habitat loss) is described in the MSCP Plan for each species, and clarified in permit conditions H and I for certain species. G. Permit Coverage Dependent on Another Subarea Plan and Permit: Coverage for the .endangered California least tern (Sterna antillarum brownii), and if they becomdisted, Orcutt's bird's-beak (Cordylanthus orcuttianus) and Del Mar'sand aster (Corethrogynefilaginlfolia var. linlfolia) is dependent upon the City of San Diego Subarea Plan which is currently in effect As long as the City of San Diego permit (PRT- 830421) is in effect, these three species are considered Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take under permit PRT-840414 to the County of San Diego. H. The following conditions apply to birds: 1. Bald Eaele. No harm, harassment, or lethal take is authorized. Take of active nests is not permitted at any time. . ',-_./ 2. Golden Eagle. No lethal take is authorized. Take of active nests is not permitted at any time. Human disturbance of active nests must be avoided, including establishing a /61 .I; (;l . 11/30/2000 16: 28 FAX 7604319624 US FISH AND WILDLIFE SVC ~004 ; PERMIT CONDITIONS FOR PRT-8404I4, cont'd. 2 \oJ 4000-foot disturbance avoidance area around active nests within the preserve. Harm as a result of habitat loss is authorized in the amount and locations specified in Table 3-5 of the MSCP Plan. 3. Migratorv Birds other than Bald Eagle. A. This Section 10(a) permit also constitutes a Special Purpose Permit under SO CFR 2127 for the take of those Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take which are listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, and which also are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, except for the bald eagle. Such Special Purpose Permit shall be valid for a period of 3 years from the effective date, provided the section 10(a) permit remains in effect for such period. Such Special Purpose Permit shall be renewed, provided that the County of San Diego continues to fulfill its obligations under this agreement. Each such renewal shall be valid for the maximum . period of time allowed by SO CFR21.27 or its successor at the time of renewal. B. Incidental take associated with habitat loss for cOvered bird species on the list of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take is subject to the restrictions provided in Table 3-5 of the MSCP Plan. These include, but are not limited to, the following reStrictions related to disturbance of active nest sites and/or occupied habitat during the breeding season: '--..../ i. No take of active nests is anticipated or authorized for birds on the list of "Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take" that are not known to nest within the MSCP plAnning area: California brown pelican, red~sh egret, ferruginous hawk, mountain plover, OmAilA goose, Swainson's hawk, long-billed 'curlew, large-billed savannah sparrow, and bald eagle. . ii. For other. birds on the list of "Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take," restrictions apply regarding take associated with impacts to active nests and/or occupied habitat during the breeding season. These restrictions are provided below. Species Take Restrictions Coastal California gnatcatcher No clearing of occupied habitat within the County of San Diego's Multiple Habitat pIAnnillg Area (MHP A) between March 1 and August 15. Least Bell's vireo No harm or lethal take authorized within the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' jurisdictional ~ands. . No clearing of occupied habitat between March 16 and September 14. '-......./. /61)""77 . 11/30/2000 16:28 FAX 7604319624 US FISH AND WILDLIFE SVC 1tJ005 PERMIT CONDmONS FOR PRT-840414, conCd. 3 '----./ Southwestern willow flycatcher No harm or lethal take authorized within the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' jurisdictional wetlands. No clearing of occupied habitat between May 2 and August 31. . Light-footed clapper rail . . . No harm, harassment, or lethal take authorized. Cooper's hawk Implement a 300-foot impact avoidance area around active nests within the preserve. Tri-colored blackbird Impacts to active nests and breeding colonies must be avoided. Peregrine falcon No harassment or lethal take authorized; take of active nests is not permitted at any time. Brown pelican No harm, harassment, or lethal Ulke authorized. Coastal cactus wren No clearing of occupied habitat between February 15 and August 15. .'-....../ Northern harrier Implement a 900-foot (or maximum possible) impact avoidance area around active nests within the preserve. Burrowing owl No incidental take authorized within the County of San Diego MHP A. . Elegant tern No harm, harassment, or 1etha1 take authorized. Human disturbance of active nests must be avoided. Incidental take during the breeding season associated with maintenance/removal of leveesfdikes is not authorized except as specifically approved on a case-by-case basis by the Service and California Department of Fish and Game. California least tern No harm, harassment, or lethal take authorized. Human disturbance of active nests must be avoided. Incidental take during the breM;ng season associated with maintenance/removal of leveesfdikes and maintenance/ enhancement of beaches is not authorized except as specifically approved !>n a case-by-case basis by the Service and ,----../ /~It . J,..'," ': 11/30/2000 16:29 FAX 7604319624 US FISH AND WILDLIFE SVC ~006 "--./ PERMIT CONDmONS FOR PRT-840414, cont'd. 4 . Western snowy plover California Department ofFish and Game. No hann, harassment, or lethal take authorized. Human disturbance of active nests must be avoided. Incidental take during the breeding season associated with maintenance/removal of levees/dikes is not authori+ed except as specifically approved on a case-by-case basis by the Service and . California Department ofFish and Game. 1. Special restrictions apply to wetland species: Incidental take authorization for covered species within U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' jurisdictional wetlands for projects that affect jurisdictional wetlands shall be authorized through future Endangered Species Act Section 7 consultations between the Service and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Watc;r Act and in accordance with the MSCP Plan, County of San Diego Subarea Plan and Implementing Agreelllent. Incidental take of wetland associated or dependent species outside of jurisdictional wetlands is authorized in accordance with the MSCP Plan, and the County of San Diego Subarea Plan and Implementing Agreement. '---../ Species Associated with or DE:1)endent upon Wetlands Southwestern willow flycatcher American peregrine falcon California brown pelican Light-footed clapper rail California least tern . Least Bell's vireo Western snowy plover Cooper's hawk Tri-colored blackbird Northern harrier Reddish egret Long-billed curlew Belding's savannah sparrow White-faced ibis '--.,/' Elegant tern Palmer's ericameria Southwestern arroyo toad Red-legged frog Southwestern pond turtle San Diego fairy shrimp Riverside fairy shrimp Salt marsh skipper Salt marsh bird's beak California Orcutt grass San Diego mesa mint Otay Mesa mint Thread-leaved brodiaea Spreading navarretia Willowy monardella ,~/~ ".J,4 ~1 .. '11/30/2000 16:29 FAX 7604319624 US FISH AND WILDLIFE SVC @"007 PERMIT CONDITIONS FOR PRT-840414, cont'd. 5 '-.J J. With regard to monitoring and enforcement: 1. The permittee mus,t ensure that Service personnel are given appropriate aq:ess (as defined under 50 CFR 13.21(e)(2)) to monitor the Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take within the County of San Diego Subarea planning area in perpetuity. 2. The permittee must ensure that the Service's Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (2730 Loker Avenue West, Carlsbad, California 92008, telephone 760-431-9440) is contacted immediately regarding any violations or potential violations of the Federal Endangered 'SpeciesAct or Migratory Bird Treaty Act. 3. Within I working day of finding dead, injured, or sick endangered or threatened wildlife species, the permittee or its designated agents must orally notify the Service's Carlsbad Field Office. Written notification to the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office and the Division of Law Enforcement (185 West F Street;Suite 440, San Diego, California 92101-6025) must be made within 5 calendar days and must include the date, time, and location of the specimen and any other pertinent information. . K. An annual report shall be prepared as described in the MSCP Plan and submitted to the Service by February 15 ofeachyeartbat the permit is in effect, beginning in 1999. One copy of the annual report shall be submitted to the 'field Supervisor of the Carlsbad Field Office, and one copy shall be submitted to the Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and :Wildlife Service, 911 Northeast 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232. .-----./ L. A copy of this permit must be in the possession of the permittee and designated agents while conducting taking activities. Please refer to the permit number in all correspondence and reports concerning permit activities. Any questions you may have . about this permit should be directed to the Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish arid Wildlife Office. ''--.-/'. /j, ..;. ,. 7') /v" -~,> '11/30/2000 16:29 FAX 7604319624 US FISH AND W1LDLIFE SVC ~008 ~ .~ '~ PERMIT CONDITIONS FOR PRT-840414, cont'd. 6 List of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take Endangered Species: ~ 1. Southwestern willow.flycatcher 2. American peregrine falcon 3. California brown pelican 4. Light-footed clapper rail 5. Least Bell's vireo (Empidonax trai/Iii extimus) (Falco pefegrinus anatum) (Pelecanus occidentalis californicus) (Rallus longirostris levipes) (Vireo bellii pusillus) Re.ptiles and AIT\J)hibians 6. Arroyo toad (Bufo microscaphus cali/ornicus) . Invertebrates 7. San Diego fairy shrimp' 8. Riverside fii.iry shrimp (Branchinecta sandiegorrensis) (Streptocephalus woottoni) ~ 9. Del Mar manzanita 10: Salt marsh bird's beak 11. San Diego button celery 12, California Orcutt grass 13. San Diego mesa mint 14. Otay Mesa mint (firctostaphylos glandulosa var. crassifolia) (Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus) (Eryngium aristulatum var.parishii) (Orcuttia cali/ornica) (Pogogyne abramsii) (Pogogyne nudiuscula) Threatened Species: ~ 15. Western snowy plover 16. Coastal California gnatcatcher 17. Bald eagle (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus) (poliopti/a cali/ornica cali/ornica) (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) /../J :"..; / / '. . 11/30/2000 16:30 FAX 7604319624 . , US FISH AND WILDLIFE SVC 141009 PERMIT CONDITIONS FORPRT-840414, cont'd. \"-.J' R~tiles and Amphibians '~' ~ 18. Red-legged frog flm!!s. 19. Encinitas baccharis Species Proposed for Listing: fll!Il13 20. San Diego thorn-mint 21. CoaStal dunes milk vetch 22. Nevin's barberry 23. Thread-leaved brodiaea 24. Otay tarplant 25: Willowy monardella 26. 'Spreading navarretia 27. Dehesa bear-grass Other Unlisted Species: Binh 28. Cooper's hawk 29. Tri-colored blackbird 30. California rofous-ciowned sparrow . 31. Golden eagle 32. Canada goose 33. Ferroginoushawk 34. Swainson's hawk 35. Coastal cactus wren 36. Northern harrier 37. Mountain plover 38. Reddish egret 39. Long-billed curlew 40. Belding's savannah sparrow 41. Large-billed savannah sparrow 42. White-faced ibis 43. Western bluebird 44. Burrowing owl 7 (Rana aurora draytani/) (Baccharis lIanessae) (Acanthomintha ilicifolia) , (Astragalus tener var. tih) (Berberis nevinii) (Brodiaea filifolia) (Hemizona canjugens) (Manardella linoides ssp. viminea) (Navarretiafassalis) (Nalina interata) (Accipiter caaperi/) (Agelaius savannaruni) (Aimaphila ruflceps canescens) (Aquila chrysqetas) (Branta canadensis) (Buteo. regalis) (Buteo. swainsani) , (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus cauesi) (Circus cyanelLl') (Charadrius mantanus) (Egretta ruftscens) (Numenius americanus) (Passerculus sandwichensis belding;) (Passerculus sandwichensis ro.stratus) (Plegadis chihi) (Sialia mexicana) (Speotyta cunicularia hypugaea) ,/; A ;:;..L.... , 11/30/2000 16:30 FAX 7604319624 US FISH AND WILDLIFE SVC 19J010 < . . . ;. PERMIT CONDITIONS FOR PRT-840414, -coot'd. 8 . '-...-/ 45. Elegant tern (Sterna elegans) Reptiles and AITIphibians 46. Orange-throated whiptaillizard (Cnemidophorus hyperthrus beldingl) 47. Southwestern pond turtle (Clemmys marmorata pallidal 48. San Diego homed lizard (Phrynosoma .coronatum) Mammals 49. Mountain lion (Felis concolor) 50. Southern mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus fuliginata) 51. American badger (Taxidea taxus) Invertebrates 52. Thome's hairstreak butterfly (Mitoura thornel) 53. Salt marsh skipper (Panoquina errans) ~ ..~ 54. Shaw's agave (Agave showil) 55. San Diego ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila) 56. Apbanisma (Aphanisma blitoides) 57. Otay in~n7jln;ta (Arctostaphylos otayensis) 58. Orcutt's brodiaea (Brodiaea orcuttil) 59. Dense reed grass (Calamagrostis densa) 60. Dunn's mariposa lily . (Calochortus dunnil) . 61. Siender-podjewelflower (Caulan/hus stenocarpus) 62. Lakeside ~anothus (Ceanothus cyaneus) 63. Wart-stemmed ceanothus (Ceanothus vemicosus) 64. Tecate cypress (Cupressus Jorbesil) 65. Short-leaved dudleya (Dudleya blochmaniae ssp. brevi/olia) 66. Variegated dudleya (Dudleya variegata) 67. Sticky dudleya . (Dudleya viscida) 68. P8Imer's erjcameria (Ericameria palmeri ssp. palmeri) 69. Coast wallflower (Erysimum ammophilum) 70. San Diego barrel cactus (Feroca.ctus viridescens) 71. Heart-leaved pitcher plant (Lepechinia cardiophylla) 72. Gander's pitcher sage (Lepechinia ganderi) 73. Nuttall's lotus (Lotus nuttallianus) 74. Felt-leaved monardella {Monardella hypoleuca ssp. lanata) 75. San Diego goldenstar (Muilla clevelandil) '---../ /<~ ,;;~~, ~ 11/30/2000 16:30 FAX 7604319624 US FISH AND WILDLIFE SVC @Oll .. . , '" I. PERMIT CONDmONS FORPRT-8404l4, cont'd. 9 "'" J 76. Snake cholla 77. Torrey pine 78. Small-leaved rose 79. San Miguel savory 80. Gander's butterweed 81. Narrow-leaved nightshade 82. parry's tetraCoccus (Opuntiaparryi var. serpentina) (PinU$ torreyana) (Rosa minutifolia) (Satureja chandler/) " (Senecio gander/) (Solanum tenuilobatum) (Tetracoccus dioicus) " "'-.,,/ '---.J /6/1 5'1 Natural Community Conservation :elan Approval . and.Ia.ke Authorization California Department ofFish and Game Approval and Supporting Findings for the County of San Diego Subarea Plan to implement the Multiple Species Conservation Program Plan 1. Introduction. A The Natural Community and Conservation Plannini Act ("NCCP Act"). The NCCP Act, California Fish &. Game Code ~2800, et seq.,1 provides for the preparation and implementation of large-scale natural resource conservation plans. A natural communities conservation plan, or "NCCP," must identifY and provide for "the regional or area wide protection and perpetuation of natural wildlife diversity, while allowing compatible and appropriate development and growth." (~2805(a).) NCCPs are intended "to provide comprehen~ive management and conservation of multiple wildlife species" including. but not limited to, species listed pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act, ~2050, et seq. (~2810.) ("CESA"). The NCCP Act promotes cooperation and coordination among public agencies, landowners, and other private interests in developing NCCPs. The California Department ofFish and Game ("CDFG") is authorized to prepare and implement NCCPs with a wide variety of private and public interests, including individuals, organizations, companies, and state and local government agencies. (~2810 and ~71L2.) Natural community conservation planning maybe undertaken by local, state, and federal agencies independently or in cooperation with other individuals and entities. (~2820.) An NCCP Plan must be approved by CDFG before it is implemented. (~2820.) To be approved, an NCCP Plan must meet standards established by CDFG. (~2820.) CDFG is authorized to prepare non-regulatol)' guidelines to establish NCCP standards and to guide the development and implementation ofNCCP Plans. (~2825(a).) NCCP Plans are also subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA "), Public Resources Code ~21 000, et seq. I All further references are to the Fish and Game Code, unless otherwise indicat~d. l ~DVd ~L96m916:xv~ I.~ .~ .;) , :;;~ NY Il:OI NOW OO-ll-n~a CDFG may authorize the "taking" of any identified species whose conservation and management is provided for in a CDFG approved NCCP Plan. (~2S3S.) Under the Fish and Game Code, "Take" means "hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or IcilI, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill." (~86.) B. The Multiple Speci~ Conservation Prowam Plan. 'J1le Multiple Species Conservation Program Plan (Volumes I & IT, as revised December, 1996) ("MSCP Plan), approved by CDFG on July 16,1997, sets forth a Multiple Species Conservation Program ("MSCP"). The MSCP, is a comprehensive, long-term habitat conservation planning program that addresses multiple species habitat needs and the preservation of native vegetation communities for a 900-square-mi1e-area in southwestern San Diego County. It is one of three subregional habitat planning efforts in San Diego county which contn"bute to preservation of regional biodiversity through coordination with other habitat conservation . planning efforts throughout southern California. When fully implemented, the MSCP and these other subregional plans will create an interconnected habitat preserve system throughout the 4,200-square-miIe county. The MSCP allows local jurisdictions to maintain land use control and development flexibility by planning a regional preserve system that can meet future public and private project mitigation needs. The MSCP area includes the County of San Diego, eleven city jurisdictions, and several independent special districts. Local jurisdictions and special districts implement their respective portions of the MSCP Plan through subarea plans, which describe specific implementing mechanisms for the MSCP. The MSCP subarea plans contribute collectively to the conservation of vegetation conununities and species in the MSCP study area. The combination ofthe subregional MSCP Plan and subarea planS serve as a multiple species Habitat Conservation Plan pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) ofthe federal Endangered Species Act ("ESA") and as an NCCP. The MSCP is being implemented in phases as participating jurisdictions and special districts submit their subarea plans to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service ("USFWS") and CDFG for approval. Upon approva1, the USFWS and CDFG can authorize the take of listed species and other species of concern, subject to the terms of the subarea plan and the MSCP. Conservation and management r~5pon5ibilities, and implementation guarantees for each subarea plan will be set forth in implementing agreements between the entity responsible for each subarea plan and the wildlife agencies (USFWS and CDFG). C. The County of San Diello Subarea Plan. The County of San Diego Subarea Plan rSubarea Plan") is set forth in the August, 1996 MSCP Plan, as revised December, 1996 and adopted by the San Diego County Board of Supervisors October 22, 1997. The Subarea Plan has been prepared pursuant to a general outline developed by the USFWS and CDFG to meet the requirements of the NCCP N;t. The Subarea Plan is the basis of the Implementing Agreement by and between the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the California.Department ofFish and Game and the County of San Diego, -2- E anVd jL96SVv916: XV~ //.J t''J ~:.) NY Il:OI NOW OO-ll-~aa executed concurrently with this NCCP Approval. The Subarea Plan is consistent with, and implements, in part, the MSCP Plan and, in addition, qualifies as a stand alone document to implement, in pan, the MSCP Preserve. The County of San Diego Presave, also referred to as a "Multiple Habitat Planning Area" or "MBP A, " was developed by the County in cooperation with the Wildlife Agencies, property owners, developers and environmental groups. The Preserve Design Criteria contained in the MSCP Plan and the County's Biological Mitigation Ordinance were used as a guide for the development of the County's Preserve. The Subarea., located mostly in the unincorporated eastern part of the MSCP study area, encompasses 252,132 acres and is composed of three segments. The Lake Hodges segment located in west-central San Diego County, west ofInterstate 15, covers roughly 8,874 acres of mostly vacant land, with approximately 512 acres of agricultural uses and a few scattered homes. Four major projects are located in this area that will be a mix of new urban level uses and low density residential developments with a variety of private and public support facilities. The Lake Hodges preserve consists of open space areas set aside in connection with the approved projects, properties where open space negotiations have been completed, and publicly owned lands. At build-out the preserve area for this segment will ~onsist of 4,743 acres of six different vegetation community types. The South County segment includes about 82,767 acres that covers substantial areas around the urban fringe of southwest San Diego County. The South County segment presently covers several private development projects with natural open space areas in addition to lands owned by non-governmental entities and publicly owned lands. The proposed preserve area for the South County segment will total approximately 48,874 acres and includes much of the river bottom lands within County jurisdiction of the Otay River and Sweetwater River. Eighteen vegetation community types, including 20,969 acres of coastal sage scrub, will comprise the natural open space preserve within the South County segment. The Metro-Lakeside-Jamul ("MLJ") segment is the third component oithe Subarea Plan and has a total area of 172,952 acres and is separated into north and south sections by Interstate 8. With a habitat protection goal of 44,764 acres, the ML1 segment will protect 33,200 additionai acres with approximately 17,000 acres to be located north ofI.8 and approximately 15,500 acres south of.I-8. One-third (11,568 acres) oftbe total anticipated conservation level is already conserved in some form of protected status protected on lands owned and managed by the State, County and private parties. The County's MHPA is approximately 115,701 acres. The County's MHPA comprises 60% of the regional MHPA. The conserved lands within the County's MHPA total 49% oftbe vacant land in the subarea (55% of total habitat land in the subarea). The County's MHPA preserves 77% ofthe core biological resource areas within its subarea and 79% of the habitat linkages. Lands which are outside of the biological core or linkage areas but are currently dedicated or designated as open space and provide some long term conservation value are included in the County's Preserve. . Approximately 88% ofthe MHPA lands (101,268 acres) within the County's subarea will -3- V 3DVd ~L96~vv916:m /',/1::''1 NY ll:OI NOW OO-II-~3G be preserved for biological purposes. This is an overall average and in some cases 98% of an area will be preserved as a result of negotiations conducted during the Subarea planning procesL Almost 63,000 acres (62%) of the total anticipated conservation level are already conserved within the County subarea The majority oflocal public lands (roughly 94%) will be preselVed. Development within the MHP A will be directed to areas oflower quality habitat and/or areas considered less important to the long-term viability ofp1ant and wildlife species. Documented populations of covered species within the County's portion of the MHP A will be protected to the extent feasible. D. Implementing Agreement Each MSCP Plan subarea plan, including the County of San Diego's Subarea Plan, will be implemented according.to an agreement between the entities or agencies responsible for implementing the subarea plan, CDFG and the USFWS. The purpose of these implementing agreements is to ensure the implementation of the MSCP and the subarea plan, to bind each party to the terms of the MSCP Plan and subarea plan, and to provide remedies and recourse for failure to adhere to the terms of the MSCP Plan or subarea plan. This NCCP Approval specifically applies to the Subarea Plan as implemented pursuant to the Implementing Agreement by rmd between the USFWS. CDFG. and the County of San Diego ("Implementing Agreement"), executed concurrently with this NCCP Approval. n. findings. All NCCPs must contain certain substantive elements identified in the NCCP Act. In addition, the MSCP and the Subarea Plan must comply with guidelines adopted by CDFG for natural community conservation planning within the Coastal Sage Scrub Planning Area And the Department must ensure that its approval of the MSCP and the Subarea Plan is consistent with its responsibilities as a State agency under CESA. Because the Subarea Plan was developed as an element of the MSCP Plan, the Subarea Plan and MSCP Plan are analyzed together as an integrated NCCP in this. NCCP Approval. A$ an integrated NCCP, the Subarea Plan is intended to be complete and independently viable. The findings herein specifically address the integrated "MSCP 1'lan/Subarea Plan." E. The NCCP Act. In addressing the scope.and purpose ofNCCPs, the NCCP Act identifies the following essential NCCP elements: 1. An NCCP must be reiPonal or area-wide in scope (62805(1I).) A$ described above the MSCP area comprises 900 square miles of coastal sage and interdigitated scrub habitat. The Subarea Plan encompasses. fully 252,132 acres within the MSCP ..4- S 3DVd SL96Svv916:XV~ /6fi :;..; P NY ll:OI NOW OO-II-~3a area. M deScnoed and analyzed in the MSCP Plan and the Subarea Plan, Chapters 4-6 of the Final Environmental Impact ReportlFinal Environmental Impact Statement (EIRIEIS, Clearinghouse Log No. 93121073, prepared by the City of San Diego as Lead Agency), Addendum to the EIR/EIS dated October 3, 1997, the County of San Diego CEQA Fmdings as a Responsible Agency ("County or San Diego CEQA Findings"), and the Implementing Agreement, Section I and Section 8, the MSCP Plan and the Subarea Plan address the protection and conseJVation of wildlife on a broad scale. CDFG hereby finds that the MSCP Plan!Subarea Plan address wildlife conservatian on a regio11lJ1 or area-wide scale, as required by 92805(a). 2. An NCCP must protect and peqJetuate natural wildlife diversity (62805(11).) The MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan provides comprehensive management and conservation of the subregion's multiple wildlife species including but not liri1ited to thos.e species listed pursuant to the CESA Consistent with the subregional MSCP framework for presClVe management, the Subarea Plan identifies eighteen (18) vegetation communities targeted for preservation and management. Management of these preserve areas, as identified in the Subarea Plan and I;(lnsistent with Table 3-5 of the MSCP Plan, and Section 10.9 of the Implementing Agreement, provide species and site-specific land use and management guidelines to ensure that the biological . values are maintained in perpetuity. The permanent protection and management of these habitats will contribute to the long-term viability of 85 plant and wildlife species within the MSCP subregion. The MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan provides for the assembly of a comprehensive preserve area consistent with the tenets of reserve design ofthe CSS NCCP Guidelines which promote biodiversity, provide for no net loss of habitat value from the present, taking into account management and enhancement. The County of San Diego will revise, adopt and implement biological mitigation and grading ordinances consistent with the subregional plan, subarea plan and Implementing Agreement in order to achieve the conservation goals set forth in the Subarea Plan. The County of San Diego commits to permanently preserve, in accordance with sections 10.3 and 10.4 of the Implementing Agreement,' approximately 101,268 acres (88%) of the MHP A lands within the Subarea. The Subarea Plan provides for the conservation of a minimum ofapproximately 79% ofihe overall habitat within the core biological resources areas and approximately 76% of the habitat within wildlife corridors and linkages, as depicted in Section I of the County's Subarea Plan. Table 1-2 of the Subarea Plan and Table 2-1 of the EIR/EIS specifies the approximate amount and location of acreage that will be permanently conseJVed for each listed vegetation community within the MHP A and MSCP Plan, respectively. The County of San Diego has committed to a comprehensive, funded, adaptive management program that provides a framework plan to ensure the needs of species and associated habitats are met. A short and long-term funding mechanism for local and regional costs for acquiring, managing and monitoring private lands within the MHP A identifies a range cir -5- 9 ~DVd 5L965~~9 W XV~ ,A ,{:-<'!' /'An ~ '... . NY El:OI NON OO-ll-n~a sources to satisfy the obligations. (Implementing Agreement, Section 11.0; Section 7 of the MSCP Plan, and Part A, Section IV ofEIRIEIS.) The County of San Diego will participate in an ongoing monitoring/research program which addresses each of the 6 elements of the CSg NCCP Guidelines "research agenda." (Conservation Guidelines, Section 3(b) (see "CSS NCCP Guidelines," below).) 'The Subarea Plan requires a continuous habitat acreage accounting model to assure that adequate progress toward implementation of the 'plan is being achieved. (Implementing Agreement, Section 14.1) A Biological Monitoring Plan to collect and analyze data on specific species and habitats has been prepared for the preserve area and includes specific research tasks that have been developed in accordance with the CSS NCCP Guidelines. (MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan, Section 1.6, and Implementing Agreement, Section 14.5.) As further described and analyzed in the MSCP Plan' and the Subarea Plan, Chapters 4-6 of the EIRIEIS, the County of San Diego Findings per CEQA, and the Implementing Agreement, Section I and Section 8, the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan provide strong and extensive protections for plant and wildlife conununities. CDFG hereby finds that the MSCP Plan/Subarea Pl~ protect and perpetuate wildlife diversity, as required by 92805(0). 3. An NCCP must allow compatible and appropriate develonment and growth (~280S(a,).) Lands not protected pursuant to the MSCP Plan or the Subarea Plan may be developed according to locaHand use laws and regulations. In addition, the Implementing Agreement provides assurance,s to local jurisdictions and landowners concerning State and federal mitigation requirements covered by the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan. (Implementing Agreement, Section 9 and Section 17.) These assurances will make local permitting processes for development projects and growth activities more ~nain and predictable. As funher descnoed and analyzed in the MSCP Plan and the Subarea Plan, Chapters 4-6 of the EIRIEIS, the County of San Diego Findings per CEQA, and the Implementing Agreement, Section 1 and Section 8, the MSCP Plan/S\lbarea Plan allow for development and growth. CDFG hereby finds that the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan allow compatible and appropriate development and growth, as required by i2805(a). 4. Is consistent with NCCP planning IIgreement (62820.) Pursuant to ~ 2820, the MSCP/Subarca Plan hss been carried out in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between CDFG and USFWS, dated December 4, 1991, and the March, 1993 Ongoing Multi-Species Plans Agreement, to which CDFG and the County of San Diego are a party, and which is incorporated in the NCCP Process Guidelinea (Section 3.6) as .6- L 3DVd ~L 965vv916 : m / ;? ('.J C!) NY El:OI NON OO-II-~3a a means of including appropriate, ongoing species management plans within the MSCP. CDFG mreby finds that the MSCP PlanISubarea Plan is consistent with the NCCP Planning Agreement between CDFG and the USFWS andwith the Ongoing Multi-Spedes Plans Agreement, as required by /2820. s. Provides for the conservation and management of ilPecies subject to talce (~283 5 ) All species subject to the take authorization included as part of this NCCP Approval are addressed in the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan. For the reasons set forth in Section 1)..2, above, IUld as further described and analyzed in the MSCP Plan and the Subarea Plan, Chapters 4-6 of the EIRlEIS, the County of San Diego Findings per CEQA, and the Implementing Agreement, Section 1 and Section 8, the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan conserve and manage all identified species for which CDFG now issues a take authoriution. CDFG has determined that implementation of the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan pursuant to the Implementing Agreement will not result in the death ofindividuals ofthe following species: bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos canadensis), California least tern (Sterna antillarium ssp. brownJ), American peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) and California brown pelican (pelecanus occidentolis ssp. cali/amiCUS). This NCCP Approval therefore is not contrary to California Fish and Game Code ~3S 11. CDFG hereby finds that the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan providesfor the conservation and management of all species subject to tm toke authorization provided as part of this NCCP Approval, as required by /2835. F. Coastal Sage Scrub NCCP Guidelines ("CSS NCCP C'11lidelines "). In 1992 CDFG, in consultation with the USFWS, developed the "Southern California Coastal Sage Scrub Natural Community Conservation Planning Process Guidelines," as amended November, 1993 ("Process Guidelines"). The Process Guidelines provided a framework for natural community cons~ation planning within the Regional Coastal Sage Scrub Planning Area. The Regional Coastal Sage Scrub Planning Area comprises roughly 6,000 square miles of coastal sage scrub and overlays parts offive counties: San Diego, Orange, Riverside, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino. Coastal sage scrub is an ecological community that supports a diverse . assemblage of native California plants and animals, including the California gnatcatcher, the cactus wren, and the orange throated whip-tail lizard. In 1992, CDFG also convened a Scientific Review Panel ("SRP"). The role of the SRP was to collect readily available data and to integrate the information into a region-wide scientific framework for conservation planning activities. The SRP's specific goals were to analyze field data and other research on the coastal sage scrub habitat in order to identify and develop the best scientific information available, and to develop consetvation guidelines to protect and manage -7- 8 ~DVd SL96Svv9l6: m i2 /;I <h WV vl:OI NOW OO-II-~~a coastal sage scrub habitat. In March of 1993, the SRP recommended a conservation strategy to serve as a basis for Coastal Sage Scrub NCCP ConsCTVation GuidelineS. CDFG and USFWS staff' worked with the SRP to prepare draft Conservation Guidelines, which were published in June, 1993: the "Southern California Coastal Sage Scrub Natural Community Conservation Planning Conservation Guidelines," dated Novembe( 1993 ("Conservation Guidelines"). The draft Conservation Guidelines were revised and linaIized in Novembe(, 1993. The final Process Guidelines include the Conservation Guidelines. Together, they comprise the CSS NCCP Guidelines. 1. Process Guidelines. The Process Guldelines guide the preparation and implementation ofNCCPs in the Regional Coastal Sage Scrub Planning Area and provide for the inte(action of an of the partne(s involved. The Process Guidelines explain the roles of the local, state, and federal gove(Omenta during the planning process and the development of regional and subregional plans. The Process Guidelines are intended to describe a process for regional and subregional natural community planning that ensures adequate participation and collaboration by all stakeholde(s in the Regional Coastal Sage SCJUb PI aiming Area. 2. Conservation Guidelines. The Conservation Guidelines were prepared pursuant to ~282S(a) and represent the best available scientific information known to CDFG concerning natural community conservation planning in the Regional Coastal Sage Scrub Planning Area. 3. Specific Findinvs. The Coastal Sage Scrub NCCP Guidelines are intended to provide guidance for natural community conservation planning within the Regional Coastal Sage Scrub Planning Area and do not represent specific criteria for CDFG approval. However, this NCCP adheres to provisions of the Process Guidelines and the Conservation Guidelines insofar as they address certain key natural community conservation plilnning elements identified in fi282S(a). a. Defining the scope ofa conservation planning area (~282S(11)(I).). The CSS NCCP Guidelines outline the five-county regional planning area of the Regional CoaStal Sage Scrub Planning Area. (Conservation Guidelines, Attachment B.) Subregional and subarea planning arellS are defined in the OMSP Agreement, MSCP Plan Vols.1 and n. and the EIRJEIS. The County of San Diego subarea plan is detailed in the MSCP Plan, Vol n. section n as adopted by the Board of Supervisors on October 22, 1997. . CDFG hereby finds that the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan substantially adheres to the scope and configuration of regional and subregional planning areaS prescribed in the .8. 6 3DVd ~L96m916:xv~ iIIA,.J WV vl:OI NOW OO-II-~3a CSS NCCP Guit:klines. b. Determining conservation standards guidelines llnd olljectives for the planning area C6282S(l\)C)n The CSS NCCP Guidelines provide guidance for the evaluation, management and restoration of coastal sage &CtUb habitat. (Conservation Guidelines, Sections 2-6.) The MSCP Plan prescribes methods, policies, guidelines and goals for assembling the MSCP Preserve (MSCP Plan, Vol 1, Section 4), implementing the MSCP Plan and Subarea Plans (MSCP Plan, Vol. I, Section 5) and managing and monitoring the MSCP preserve (MSCP Plan Vol. 1, Section 6). The Subarea Plan presenoes species and habitat-specific goals and objectives for the management of each preserve area consistent with the guidelines established in Vol. 1, Section 6 of the MSCP Plan. Activities for the County of San Diego subarea plan include management recommendations, guidelines, land use considerations and preserve design and compatloility. . . CDFG hereby finds that the MSCP p/anlSubarea Plan substantially adhere to the standards, guit:klines and objectivesfor the Regional Coastal Sage Scrub Planning Area prescribed tn the CSS NCCP Guidelines. c. Appoint;n!! one or more adviso,y committees to review and make recommendations regarding the prenaration and imnlementation of natural community conservation vlans (~2825Ca)C3))' coordinating with local stllte and federal agencies C6282S(l\)(4))' llnd incor:porating public il\Put (~282S(ll)CS)) The CSS NCCP Guidelines provide for State and federal wildlife agency coordination, and for participation by and coordination with public agencies and the members of the public. (process Guidelines, Sections 3-5.) Coordination between State and federal agencies includes the December 4, 1991 MOU between CDFG and the USFWS. 1'\1e MSCP Working Group, formed in March 1991, fulfilled the advisory body role for the development, financing and implementation of the MSCP Plan. The group included representatives from state and federal wildlife agencies, local jurisdictions, public works agencies and representatives of development interests and enviromnental groups from various sectors ofthe community. Other advisory groups included the MSCP Policy Group, Science Subcommittee, Regional Conservation Coordinating Committee and a Technical Committee that focused efforts to assure the coordination of key scientific, public policy, and finance/acquisition strstegy aspects. A Biological Task Force was assigned to . develop the Biological Standards and Guidelines for Multiple Species Preserve Design using the best scientific information available. These standards and guidelines provide the frame work for development and design of the MHP A as well as other preserve design alternatives considered in the EIRIEIS. A regional habitat management technical committee for coordination of preserve management will be responsible for technical issues associated with preserve management. (Implementing Agreement, Section 14.1.) -9. 01 JDVd mmv916:XV..r A .,) >;i' ",_.) NY Sl:OI NOn OO-ll-~J( CDFG hereby finds that the preparation of the MSCP PkmlSubarea Pian substantially adhered to the CSS NCCP Guideline5' provi5ions regarding the appointment of "advisary committee5, .. coordination with local, state andfederol agencies, and public participation. d. Ensuring compatibili~ with the Federal Endangered Species Act (fESA,) (~2825(a)(6\ , The CSS NCCP Guidelines provide for coordination between CDFG and the USFWS and address the requirements ofFESA. (process Guidelines, Sections 1, 3, 4; and S.) Pursuant to the December 4, 1991 Memorandum of Understanding between CDFG and the U.S. Fish and W1ld1ife Service, the two agencies ag(eed to ensure that plans prepared by local governments and landowners pursuant to the NCCP Act will facilitate compliance with FESA. The MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan comprehensively addresses habitat conservation concerns pursuant to the standards established by section 10(a)(1)(B) ofFESA and through the special4(d) rule promulgated by the USFWS, is compatible and consistent with the incidental take requirements of FESA. CDFG hereby finds that the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan substantially adhere5 to the CSS NCCP Guidelines' provi5iom for ensuring compatibility and compliance with ESA. e. Obtaining approval of the MSCP Plan and Subarea Plan bv CDFG (62825(7) ). The CSS NCC.P Guidelines prescribe an approval process. (process Guidelines, Section 5.4). As provided therein, concurrent with CDFG's execution of an Implementing Agreement for the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan, CDFG will adopt this NCCP Approval and issue a take authorization for identified species whose conservation and management are provided for in the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan. The Implementing Agreement will be executed concurrently with this NCCP Approval. CDFG hereby finds that the approval process employed for the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan substantially adhere5 to the CSS NCCP Guidelines. f. Provisions for implementation of the plan (S2825(N(8)). As prescribed in the CSS NCCP Guidelines, the MSCP Plan and iu subarea plans will be implemented according to the terms of implementing agreements executed by all necesSlll}' participants. The implementing agreements will obligate the participants to implement the MSCP Plan and the applicable subarea plan as necessary to assure the long-term viability ofbiologica1 . resources while providing for compatible economic development activities. -10- II ]DVd ~L96~vv916:XV.'! /" A,... NV ~l:OI NOW OO-II-~]G CDFG hereby finds thaI the mechanism for implementing the MSCP plan/Subarea Plan substantially adheres 10 the CSS NCCP Guidelines. g. Provide direction for monitoring and r~portinB on plan implementation. ' . The CSS NCCP Guidelines provide for monitoring and ~aluating implementation of the 'NCCPs. (process Guidelines, Section 6.) In conformance With the MSCP Plan (Section 6.4) and the Subarea Plan (Section 1.S.13), the Implementing Agreement (Section 14) establishes an implementation plan to monitor species and their associated habitats. A habitat conservation . accounting model and a procedure repon to the USFWS and CDFG win provide for continual tracking ofbabitat lost and preserved in the subregion and subarea planning areas. CDFG hereby finds that lhe MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan substantially adhere to lhe CSS NCCP, Guidelines provisions concerning monitoring and reporting on NCCP implementation. h. Amendinll nlan consistent with the initial intent of plll.n (~282S(a)(lO.)'- The CSS NCC)? Guidelines do not specifically address the amendment ofNCCPs once they are finalized, so it is not necessary to find that the MSCP Plan and the Subarea Plan adhere to the Guidelines in this regard. Nonetheless, the Implementing Agreement includes amendment provisions that allow defined minor amendments, and other amendments with appropriate review and approval. i. Interim Stre.tl:l!V Guidelines. In addition to the above required elements, the CSS NCCP Guidelines included provisions addressing the destruction of coastal sage scrub habitat during the interim planning period leading up to the final preparation and implementll.tion ofNCCPs. (Process Guidelines, Section'4; Conservation Guidelines, Section 4) Interim take pennits and conservation planning during this interim period have complied with the "interim strategy" requirements of the CSS NCCP Guidelines (Chapters 4 and 6 of the EIRIEIS, and County of San Diego Quarterly Reports to date) and total coastal sage scrub acreage impacted is significantly less than the 5% allowance in the CSS NCCP Guidelines. CDFG hereby finds thqt the County of San Diego has substantially adhered to the CSS NCCP Guidelines provisions concerning lhe loss of coastal sage scrub habitat prior 10 preparation and implementatian of the MSCP .Plan and the Subarea Plan. G. CESA. CESA states, -11- II a:lVd ~L96~vv916: m /61} b ~) wv ~l:OI NOW OO-ll-~aa The Legisl.ature further finds and declares that it is the policy of the state that state agencies should not approve projects as proposed which would jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat essential to the continued existence ofthose species, if there are re,asonable aild prudent alternatives available consistent with conserving the species or its habitat which would prevent jeopardy. Furthennore, it is the policy of this state and the intent of the Legislature that reasonable and prudent alternatives shall be developed by the department, together with the project proponent and the state lead agency, consistent with conserving the species, while at the same time maintaining the project purpose to the greatest extent possible. (~2053.) CESA also requires that all state agencies, boards, and commissions shall seek to conserve endangered species and threatened species and shall utilize their authority in furtherance of the purposes ofCESA 02055.) CDFG must ensure that its approval of the MSCP Plan and th.e Subarea Plan does not conflict with this responsibility. CDFG hereby finds that the MSCP Plan and the Subarea Plan. ifproperIy implemented, will not jeopardize the continued existence of aTO' endangered species or threatened species or result In the destruction or adverse modification of habitat essential to the continued existence of those species. CDFG further finds that the MSCP Plan and the Subarea Plan will assist in the conservation of endangered species, threatened species and other species of concern m. CDFG Approval. Based on the foregoing analysis and findings, CDFG finds, . that th.e MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan meets all necessary requirements for a natural community conservation plan; . that the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan prescribes a mitigation strategy under which each project covered by the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan will be required only to provide mitigation or conservation that is proportional to the project's expected impacts to the southwestern San Diego County ecosystem; and . that the mitigation strategy described in the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan evidences a clear nexus between mitigation required for projects covered by the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan and the projects' expected impacts to the southwestern San Diego County ecosystem. Based on these findings, pursuant to ~2820, CDFG hereby approves the County of San . .12- El ~DVd ~L96~vv916:m I b l1~u:" NY 9Z:01 NOW OO-ll-~~G Diego Subarea Plan, as an integrated part of the MSCP Plan, for implementatio\). as an NCCP. lV. Take Authorization. Pursuant to ~2835, CDFG may pennit the taking of any identified species whose cOnservation and management is provided for in a CDFG approved natural communities conseIVation plan. CDFG hereby authorizes take of the species identified below incidental to development and growth activities that are subject to, and are carried out in compliance with the MSCP Plan, the Subarea Plan, and the Implementing Agreement. A SCQJle of Take Authorization. Development and growth activities potentially subject to and covered by the MSCP Plan, Subarea Plan and the Implementing Agreement include, 1. Urban facilities, structures, and uses, without limitation, 2. Residential, commercial, facilities and infrastrocture improvements, 3. Road and related transportation facilities, 4. Agricultural activities on specified lands, and 5. Development and management of permanent, multi-habitat preserves within the MHP A . B. Jdentified Soedes. The following 85 species will be affected by public and private projects and activities covered by the Subarea Plan. While the Subarea Plan provides benefits for these species, it may also subject them to direct and indirect adverse impacts associated with public and private projects and activities covered by the Subar~ Plan. Species evaluations and findings are described in the MSCP Plan (Volume 1). Estimated habitat loas, by vegetation community, is detailed in the Subarea Plan as approved by the Board of Supervisors on Octob~r 22, 1997. This list constitutes the list of "Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take," pursuant to the Implementing Agreement. ~pecies listed under CESA are underlined. flan11 1. California orcutt grass rOrcuttia califomicaJ (endangered) 2.. Coa~tal dunes milk vetch (Astraralus tener var titiJ (endRn~ered) 1. Dehesa bear-grass (Nolina InterrataJ (endangered) ~ DUM'S mariposa lily {Calochortus dunniiJ (rare) -13- vi 3DVd ~L96~vv916:XV~ /6,4117 wv 9l:01 NOW OO-II-~3a 1. Encinitas bacch!"s (Baccharis vanessae) (endangered) ~ Gander's butterweed (Senecio yanderO (rare) 1.. Nevin's barberrv (Berberis nevinli'l (endangered) L Otl\Y mesa mint rPOf:O'lJ"le nudiuscula) (endangered) 2. Ot~ tar plant'fHemizonia C01!iUfl!nsJ (endangered) .1Q. Salt marsh bird's beak (Corqylanthus maritimus spo maritimus) ( endangerec{) 1L San Diego button-celery fEryn'{ium aristu/atum SQP oorishil) (endanl!ereQ) ll.. San Diel!o me.~a mint rPoforJme abramsiil (j!fId3J\gerecI) u. San Diego thorn-mint (Acanthomintha i1icifo/ia) (endangered H. Short-leaved dudteya rDud/eva hlochmaniae Ss)) brevifoliq) (endangerecl) lS.. Small-leaved rose (Rosa minuttfo[ia) (endanllerecl) ~ Thread-Ieafbrodiaea fBrodiaeali/{folla) (endangered) 11. Willowy monardella (ftIfonardella /inoides s$p. viminea) ~dangered) 18. Aphanisma (Aphanisma blitoides) 19. Coast wallflower (Erysimum ammophilum) 20. Del Mar manzanita (Arctostaphylos glandulOSlJ var. crassifolia) 21. Del Mar Mesa sand aster {Lessingiafilaginifolia var.linifolia 22. Dense reed grass (Calamogrostis 1coelerioides) 23. Felt-leaved monardeUa (Monardella hypoleuca ssp.lanata) 24. Gander's pitcher sage (Lepechinia ganderi) 25. Heart-leaved pitcher sage (Lepechinia cardiophyila) 26. Lakeside ceanothus (Ceanothus cyaneus) 27. Narrow-leaved nightshade (Solanum tenuilobatum) 28. Nuttall's lotus (Lotus nutta/lianus) 29. Orcutt's bird beak (Cordylanthus orcuttianus 30. Otay manzanita (Arctostaphylos otayenis) 31. Palmer's ericameria (Ericamerica palmeri ssp. palmer")) 32. Parry's tetracoccus (Ietracoccus dioicus) 33. Protstrate navarretia (Navarretia fossalis) 34. San Diego ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila) 35 San Diego barrel cactus (Ferocaetus vlridescens) 36. San Diego Golden star (Muilla cleveland/I) 37. San Miguel savory (Satureja chandleri) 38. Shaw's agave (Agave shawii) 39. Slender-podjewelflower (Caulanlhus stenocarpus) 40. Sticky dudleya (Dudleya vlSeldo) 41. Tecate cypress (Cuprflssusforbesif) 42. Torrey pine (pinus torreyana ssp. torreyana) 43. Variegated dudleya (Dudleya variegata) -14- ~ I ~nv d ~L9mv916:m /1;1+, j WV Ll:OI NOW OO-ll-~~a Amphibians 44. Arroyo southwestern toad (Bufo lTIicroscapJrus ca/ifomicus) 45. California red-legged frog (Rana aurora drayt01'lif) RllPtiles 46. Orange-throated whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperythrus be/dingf) 47. San Diego homed lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillel) 48. Southwestern pond turtle (Clemmys marmorata ssp. pallidal Birds. ~ American peregrine falcon (Falco perewinusJ (endangere<t) ,SQ. Bald eagle rHaliaeetus leucocephalusJ (endangered) , .ll.. Belding's savannah sparrow (passerculus s01'ldwichensis ssp. beldingO (endangered) .sz. California brown pelican fPelecanus occidental/s SSTJ. califomicu~1 (endangered) 2J.. California least tern (Stema antillarum s$JJ. brown;) (endangered) ~ Least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii ssp. pusillus) (endanllered) ~ Light-footed clapper rail fRallus longirostris s$.p. levfpesJ (endaneered) ~ Southwestern willow flycatcher (F.mpidonar trailli e:ctimus) ~ndangere<t) 51... Swaivsoo's Hawk (Buteo swainsoniJ (threatened) 58. California rufous-crowned sparrow (Aimophila ruftceps ssp. canescens) 59. Canada goose (Branta canadensis moffitti) 60. Coastal California gnatcatcher (Pol/optila califomica ssp. califomica) 61. Coastal cactus wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus ssp. coue$!) 62. Cooper's hawk (Accipiter coopeTl) 63. Elegant tern (Sterna elegans) 64. Ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis) 65. Golden eagle (Aquila chrysiJetos canadensis) 66. Large-billed savannah sparrow (passercu/us S01'ldwichensis) 67. Long-billed curlew (Numenius americanus) 68. Mountain plover (Charadrius montanus) 69. Northern harrier (Circus cyaneus) 70. Reddish egret (Egretta rufescens) 71. Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor) 72. Western bluebird (Sialia me:ricana) 73. Western burrowing owl (Speotylo cunicularia ssp. hypugasa) 74. Western snowy plover (Charadrius alexandrinus ssp. nivosus) 75. White-faced ibis (plegadis chthi) -15- 91 anVd SL96S~~916:XV~ ;16/1 NY LZ:OI NOW OO-II-~aa Mammals 76. American Badger (Taxidea tarus) 77. Southern mule deer (Odccoileus hemionus juliginakl) 78. Mountain Lion (Felis concolor) Invertebrates 79. Riverside fairy shrimp (Streptocephaluswoottoni) 80. Salt marsh skipper (panoquina errans) 81. San Diego fairy sluimp (BranchineckI sandiegoensis) 82. Thome's hairstreak butterfly (Mitoura thomei) FIlum 83. Orcutt's brodiaea (Brodiaea orcuttii) 84. Snake cholla (Opuntia parry; var. serpentina) 85. Wart-stemmed ceanothus (Ceanothus verrucosus) C. ~onservation and Management Measures. 'This take authorization is specifically contingent on the following: . All requirements detailed in the MSCP Plan and the Subarea Plan shall be implemented by the County of San Diego as specified in the Implementing Agreement between the Department, the USFWS and the County of San Diego. . . This take authorization shall commence on the date ofthis NCCP Approval and shall remain effective, subject to the Implementing Agreement, for so long as this NCCP Approval is effective. D. Additional Species. In the event that a species not identified in this take authorization is listed as endangered or threatened pursuant Fish and Game Code Section 2070, or is a candidate for such listing pursuant to Fish and Game Cod,e Section 2074.2, the Department shall consider, and if appropriate, expeditiously act to negotiate and execute, a memorandum of understanding with the County of San Diego providing for the conservation and management of the species in order to extend this take authorization to the species. In determining whether any funher mitigation measures are required to amend this take authorization to include an additional species, the Department shall follow the process descn"bed in the MSCP Plan. -16- L\ anVd SL96SVV916:XV.!! /t)/: -:/) NV Ll:O\ NOW OO-\\-OaO E Y'" . .\nutatlons. This take authorization does not constitute or imply compliance with, or entitlement to proceed with any project under laws and regulations beyond the authority and jurisdiction of the Department. The County of San Diego has independent responsibility for complianCl: with any llI1d all applicable laws and regulations. V. Federal 4(<(\ Rule. The special4(d) Rule for the California gnatcatcher, adopted by USFWS on December 10, 1993, provides, in pan: Incidental take of the coastal California gnatcatcher will not be considered a violation of ~ 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), ifit results from activities conducted pursuant to the State of California's Natural Couununity Conservation Planning Act of 1991, and in accordance with a NCCP plan far the protection ofCSS habitat, prepared consistent with the State's NCCP Conservation and Process Guidelines, provided that: (I) The NCCP plan has been prepared, approved, and implemented pursuant to Fish & Game Code ~~ 2800 - 2840; and . (Ii) The Fish and Wildlife Service has issued written concurrence that tbe NCCP plan meets the standards set forth in 50 CFR 17.32(b)(2). CDFG's findings herein are iIitended to demonstrate that the MSCP Plan/Subarea Plan bas beCl\ prepared, approved and implemented in compliance with subsection (I) !lI>ove. VI. Suspension and Termination. This NCCP Approval is subject to suspension or termination by action of the Director of CDFG. VII. puration. This NCCP Approval shall remain effective for 50 years from the effective date below, unless suspended, terminated or extended by earlier action of the Director ofCDFG. Signed' ~t!&:.e~ ~~tX.- Jacqueline a Sj:h~Ff.. DirectCH" California Departnient ofFish and Game Date: ~ /7, I'?,?G- ..- -17- 81 ~DVd SL96St>V9WXVil /~I:I "// . , wv 8Z:01 NOW OO-II-~~a DEC-ll~OO MON 10:28 AM FAX:9164459675 PAGE 19 FAX MESSAGE --------------- --------------- Date: Dec-11-00 10:28 AM To: Fax No: 919497980511 From: Fax No: 9164459675 Total: 19Page (s) (Including this page) / A.. 71 j 0'1 .____ :ounty of San Diego Sllb-Area South County Segment ~ Tab~ Authoriud ArOll :;~jo~~ ~o~ ~~~~~~~:,,~~vorod IiliJ!] MilJor AmllndlT\Gl'lt Arn o Minor Amondmont Aroa R MInor Amllndmllnt AraB with Spoolal Roquiromonto (SoaToxt) ~Stll10JHIIFIlCility EWatorDiutrictLarldl ~ No T.ko Authoritod ~ Take Authorized Con51s1ont V11lthMEltfo/lakIl5ido/Jomul SElgmontCritoria [2J Uninoorporalod Lando Out,ldoofMSCP [SJlhCorpOfalOdCltloD ~lllkoll !ZQlRolldo [ZQ]P''lretlIU",,1I !2YJSllb.Arllll SllgmontBoundll1)/ I2SZlMSCPBoundilry I1liII Activo Uuo Plonnir.gAroa5 [::=J City of Cl1UlllViotll MSCP S'lbnr.." Ph'ln Compon..ntBoundllrioo IZ;z]PropocIld5tl1tzlRoutD125AlignmontG (PlOjllcl Not Affectod By Sogment Plan} '" .... ~ ... .~\! (; r--~ ~ ." .-:-.'......'. '^-C:;. :ff>~, , -, B~~oo ::::c: ED ~ =I I~.' ~ \, I I ",d.:;:ltll.,.. FIG. 1-2 I . -L I I r .-, /j -::IJ;. I I ~\' 0",0 ~0'~ 00~ ",'tI I I ~ I I I I I I I .~. . A San Miguel Ranch Project Vicinity Map Source: USGS 7.5' Jamul Mountains and National City, CA. Quadrangles 500 0 500 1000 Feel ~ I It;w-..(....~~:''''. """'/~1 f' f~_i.- V ~ EXHIBIT L I"l .... " I"l .... ~11 ~A;)t.Mt.AI AAU 1'\ I un I ur nA I run Il'Iunt.;);) AAU t.u"t.;):). KUAU ANU U I I L I I Y PURPOSES, INCLUDING BUT NOT liMITED TO ELECTRIC POWER. ~ELPHONE. GAS. WATER, SEWER AND CABLE TELEVISION LINES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO. OVER. UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF PARCEL I OF "PARCEL MAP NO. 16033. IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DrEGO. STATE OF CAIFORNfA. fiLED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER. OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. MARCH 22. 1990 AS FILE/PAGE NO. 90-152376 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED AS "40,00 WIOE ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT TO SUBSEOUENT OWNERS OF PARCEL 2 FROM PARCEL I. PURSUANT" TO SECTION 18.20.150 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE. ON SAID PARCEL MAP. .~ I::: CD :E CiS . 0.. ~ If) '<t III If) 00 Ifl PARCEL 6. BEING A pORTION OF SECTIONS 22 ANO 23. TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH. RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. ALL IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. STATE OF. CALIFORNiA. SAID PORTIONS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLows. 8EGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23. THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF"SAID SECTION. SOUTH 89'44'48' EAST, 1301.37 FEET TO THE , NORTHWESTERLY.CORNER OF RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 8514. ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY.RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND STATE. THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY Of sflo RECORD OF SURVEY SOUTH 00' 43' 23' WEST 2644.25 FEET. NORTH 89'04'03' WEST, 649.93 fEET. SOUTH 02'00'05' WEST 659.32 fEET. NORTH 89' 00' 58' WEST 653.64 FEET. SOUTH 02' 25' 42' WEST 886. 10 FEET. THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY NORTH 86'56'21' WEST 1813.50 FEET. THENCE NORTH 00' 00' 00' .EAST. 1424. 12 FEET. THENCE NORTH 89' 18' 33' EAST. 1875,74 FEET. THENCE NORTH 00'41'05' EAST 1308.67 FEET. THENCE SOUTH 89'24'22' WEST 484.37 FEET. THENCE NORTH 00'00'00' EAST 1309.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH 00'00'00' EAST 1309.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF . SAID' SECTION 22. THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH. 59'30' I I' EAST 500.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Q If) Ul W t- a: ~ 8 Ul Ul a: .xl ~ ~ ~ .... '<t IS) .... ~ IS) (\J I I"l ...... I U l!:l I"l .... 0.. 7i b t- II \'( , ,~ ...., SHEET 1 OF 2 \ '- EASE/JENr TO SDGttE PER '--DOC. REC. 2-06-87 AS F /p 87-068825 O.R. N 86'56'2J"W 1849.42' "B" POINT '" 8. 15' ,,<-J 5'41"W N 19'3, 109.96 N 08'I1'18"E 62.00' N J?- ;s..?8.<'8:'J~ N ? ".?:.r ...?'-""'S....,{)S.. - 86'...~"S' l" ,y '",,' 0c9'l- "0;5, <; ,y ,,~S "~ ~ S :s{)S~ ~.?.?. "" I~- ''''" "oJ." ,y ";,.?~ .?",. 09.<> ? "s' O,c9? '.?~ '11 1'c9:;> J' 60S! OS' 6".~ ca.... ,y ...". <: (;, ',,>01'0' '?~ '9.,S' 'A. 00. ".? 'r 0,. l" .9 .6'0' 3'0:'09. :9.00' ,y '.?' . C 6', ,y 1'6';". .S.? .?S'" l" 1 ...?:,?~ '.?l.ae. ..y sP~S~. "S,OO' ""oe~ - - ~ " :otlQ ~<'! ~\2 ~..., 22 ~ 23 26 "". "-G' ."i!\. <v~. ;g<v ~ f:>::S~ t:j .~ ~~~~ ...... .".... ~ Ni8 ~ol !8~ 4i ~ ~ ~~~ 28 21 - - - - - - POINT OF BEGINNING NW CORNER, SEC 26, T 17 5, R 1 W. S8M ~~\ ~ , Q.. ~<<f PARCEL (05-3) "8 II j:::! 0; - .., - 1<' " It) .... !'I <::> <::> ~ See SHeer No. <> VI () ~ -" . 1\ g ---^y-N 89'55'19"W lJJO.78' ~ \ . HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES 300 0 ~ 300 600 900 I I SCALE 1" = 1xHIBIT J:L SA" DllCo. 'Me PI>>NNG 10179 IUmekenI St. SYIte 200 ENGINllRING Son o;qo, Co 92121 SURVEYING PHlBSB)ss&.<500. FX(8S8)SS8-"'" R:\OI~""'\D' os-J PH 1 $NT O,.DK W.O/ 201'-4 ,.,. ;'),A . . EXHIBIT "B" SHEET 2 OF 2 ~ 1\1 <?J s>,..'-:'<' "'06' 1y Z c - !..< <.n h5 <0 ~ <.n - ?> ~. SEE SHEET NO. 1 15' N B9'S5'19"W lJJO.7B' PARCEL "8-1" 'oR " '" ~ 'I- "'.s1 .s^ cr ~~ <t-. :, <J~ pOINT "A" 1\1 6';> s6'~. 'I- .6's' ?.9~ 0'.... '>.s. ..:'>/...:'.>. ~y 00. "'.....> .s....o <f' ''>'0 ~. . 0 Ci"~ PARCEL (05-3) ~ co !"l '"" - b c z ''a'' Ul () ~ .' . HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES v~ \\.oc't01!:.. ~- rf>.f{C " "6........2. ~ \~ '\.'1- ~ ;.., ~ '\.~ ,""co ~ '\.~~ '"" "\--.. 0- ?v '\.~. c ... .'-' 1>, , '\.<" z ~'Ii l",59B.46 , ~ ~ /:1' R",20.64.Pf7" b",16 J6 ROAD -- . \I VI o o . pOINT "C" ~ \ c SAN Dileo, INe. 300 0 ~ 300 SCALE 1" = 300' 600 I 900 I PlNftNG 1J179 tbnnekens St. Suite 200 ENGlNlfllNG SIll Dioc~ c. 92121 SURVEI'lNG PH(858)SS8.4SOO. FXllI58)S58-141O R:\OIJS\4mop\D' OS-J PH 1 SHT Q2.DWG w.fJ./ 209'-4 /"';:;-77 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THOSE PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 22 AND 27 IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "B" (OS-3) BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 26 OF SAID TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAID POINT BEING IN THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED TO TRIMARK PACIFIC - SAN MIGUEL LLC, (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "TRIMARK LAND"), FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1997 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1997-0439631 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID "TRIMARK LAND" THE FOLLOWING 4 COURSES: 1. ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 26 SOUTH 00024'57" WEST, 1319.72 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 27; 2. THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER NORTH 89055'19" WEST, 1330.78 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; 3. THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER SOUTH 00012'38" WEST, 1297.55 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 27; 4. THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER SOUTH 00012'26" WEST, 417.83 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "C", SAID POINT BEING IN THE NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES KNOWN AS PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, PER DOCUMENT FILED IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ON NOVEMBER . 13,1997 AS FILE NO. 1997-0571418 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, PAGE 1 OF 5 :TN M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptionslA03 Par B (OS-3).doc WO 2091-2 1217/00 / ." ?) .' , , /1:, /1" SAID POINT BEING IN A NON-TANGENT 2064.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 07'23'59" EAST TO SAID POINT; THENCE LEAVING THE BOUNDARY OF SAID "TRIMARK LAND" WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY SIDELINE AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16'36'47", A DISTANCE OF 598.46 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SIDELINE THE FOllOWING 30 COURSES: 5. NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 9'12'48" WEST, 33.29 FEET; 6. THENCE NORTH 31'48'47" WEST, 863.63 FEET; TO A POINT DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "An; 7. THENCE NORTH 54'07'03" EAST, 137.70 FEET; 8. THENCE NORTH 75'27'00" EAST, 84.71 FEET; 9. THENCE NORTH 56048'19" EAST, 67.65 FEET; 10. THENCE NORTH 17"18'08" EAST, 303.79 FEET; 11. THENCE NORTH 59038'13" EAST, 196.83 FEET; 12. THENCE NORTH 32006'33" EAST, 79.07 FEET; 13. THENCE NORTH 5034'10" EAST, 290.82 FEET; 14. THENCE NORTH 1035'29" WEST, 516.74 FEET; 15. THENCE NORTH 57044'08" WEST, 213.92 FEET; 16. THENCE NORTH 25057'47" WEST, 45.00 FEET; 17. THENCE NORTH 12046'31" EAST, 121.08 FEET; 18. THENCE NORTH 1050'49" EAST, 61.92 FEET; 19. THENCE NORTH 17040'00" EAST, 99.00 FEET; 20. THENCE NORTH 64054'17" EAST, 112.60 FEET; 21. THENCE NORTH 48023'03" EAST, 69.15 FEET; 22.THENCE NORTH 24045'12" EAST, 69.05 FEET; 23. THENCE NORTH 14014'32" EAST, 98.87 FEET; 24. THENCE NORTH 11025'05" WEST, 133.11 FEET; 25. THENCE NORTH 40054'55" EAST, 57.22 FEET; 26. THENCE NORTH 0015'08" EAST, 86.63 FEET; 27. THENCE NORTH 42031'09" EAST, 77.29 FEET; 28. THENCE NORTH 37"28'43" EAST, 75.28 FEET; 29. THENCE NORTH 8'11'18" EAST, 62.00 FEET; 30. THENCE NORTH 19'35'41" WEST, 109.96 FEET; PAGE20F5 :TN M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptionslA03 Par B (OS-3).doc WO 2091-2 1217/00 .~ 11 ,..:>,~) . ( 31. THENCE NORTH 36048'42" WEST, 93.96 FEET; 32. THENCE NORTH 66014'20" WEST, 79.53 FEET; 33. THENCE NORTH 86056'23" WEST, 12.29 FEET; 34. THENCE NORTH 3003'37" EAST, 27.00 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "B", SAID POINT BEING IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 200.00 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY DESCRIBED IN "EXHIBIT B" OF FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED FEBRUARY 6,1987 AS FILE/PAGE NO. 87- 068825 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT ALSO BEING IN THE BOUNDARY OF SAID "TRIMARK LAND"; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING 2 COURSES: 35. ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE SOUTH 86056'23" EAST, 1849.42 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 22; 36. THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 02024'47" WEST, 385.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM A 15 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, THEWESTERL Y SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED ABOVE AS POINT "A" AND POINT "B", COURSES NUMBERED 7 THROUGH 34. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 31048'47" WEST THROUGH POINT "A" AND TERMINATE NORTHEASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 86056'23" WEST THROUGH POINT "B". ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM A 20 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND LYING ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "C", SAID POINT BEING IN THE NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES KNOWN AS PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, PER DOCUMENT FILED IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ON NOVEMBER 13, 1997 AS FILE NO. 1997-0571418 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAlt> POINT PAGE 3 OF 5 :TN M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptiOllslA03 Par B (OS-3).doc W02091-2 1217/00 /",j!) t) ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT 2064.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 07023'59" EAST TO SAID POINT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY SIDELINE AND THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16036'47" A DISTANCE OF 598.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS SOUTH 00012'26" WEST THROUGH POINT "C" AND WESTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 09012'48" WEST THROUGH THE POINT OF TERMINUS. PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 100.916 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "B-1" A 15 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, THE WESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED IN PARCEL "B" ABOVE AS POINT "A" AND POINT "B", COURSES NUMBERED 7 THROUGH 34. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 31048'47" WEST THROUGH POINT "A" AND TERMINATE NORTHEASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 86056'23" WEST THROUGH POINT "B". PARCEL "B-1" CONTAINS 1.170 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "B-2" A 20 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND LYING ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "C", SAID POINT BEING IN THE NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES KNOWN AS PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, PER DOCUMENT FILED IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ON NOVEMBER 13. . 1997 AS FILE NO. 1997-0571418 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. SAID POINT PAGE40F5 :ov M:\2091\004\Legal OescriptionslA03 Par B (OS-3).doc WO 2091-2 12/8100 .;;,4 .H ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON.TANGENT 2064.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 07023'59" EAST TO SAID POINT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY SIDELINE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF W36'47" A DISTANCE OF 598.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS SOUTH 00012'26" WEST THROUGH POINT "C" AND WESTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 09012'48" WEST THROUGH THE POINT OF TERMINUS. PARCEL "B.2" CONTAINS 0.280 ACRES MORE OR LESS. ~~~~ '2 -No DANA MICHAEL SEGU L.S.6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. PAGE 5 OF 5 :TN M:\2091\004llegal DescriptlOllslA03 Par B (OS-3).doc WO 2091.2 1217/00 / "Ii i), IV 7.?i?.l"~ w77j 00, 575.6;]' ~" 96. 9'00'00 " N 4 PARCEL ';1- (05-1) 'U', EASEMENT TO SlXMtE PER 9:>. DOC, REC. 3-07-60 F/N 474O.J O,R, -z.. '/' -z.. -z.. ",<>> z "%- O\~ ~ .... -z..-z..","fb, t,"'. -z, ~ ~ ~~~~..~~ ~ 0 ~_ ~..~~~~-l:. ,1:1 .:. ~ % - _....,l "," ~~ ~ r ~ ~~~_~~ '" co _.. _ t.II.~ (J'I CQI.. ... ... '(..:)~..~.. '" ~"':P" "'-'" ~'(..:).~o... J.lJ(.Q "O'"CJ:Io ~.~'(..:).. !n.... ....,A"".., n ~...... .~ '& 'S"'" b ~... l1 ,. it" ;: ~ ,\~'E ~.," " '<:: 68'~022 L ~":l "" N 241. '94.t~46'E L/7 -S ~ ~ 01 N 1,/00 - / <}.\ &&.'0 J~d'31'E / .oa'oO~-S2\"IITIfUE POINT 6 .\ 11.\ '!J9 of BEGINNING 2-l I' \' PARCEL ':4 l' J MT. MIGUEL ROAD /PROPOSED)/IPOINT OF COMMENCEU::: SE CORNER S[CnON 21 T 17 S, R 1 W. SBM N OI'oo'oo"W 1/6.00' NUMB[R L/ L2 L3 L4 LS L6 L7 L8 L9 L/O L/I L/2 L/3 L/4 L/5 L/6 L/7 ,,~ ":l ~ .~ ,~ ~ 4. ~ dlf..lP 4'1\'T '" '00"11. '!J:5 4~ ~~.00 1'1 N 4J"00'49"W 72.47' N Jj'oo'OO"W 38.00' ( 0' \tl .n'OO"W 70.0 ~ N 3';"" , N lo00'OO"W 100.00 , 8l OO"OO'OO"f 100.0q ~ N . O'OO"f 49.00 ~ N 620 ~ , 8'00"f 143.00' ~ N 043 ~ N 0J"J2'OO"W 171.00' N 19'JO'J2t J6.11: N 25'OO'OOt 6J.00 N O4'OO'OO"f 52.00' N 18'56'00"W 144.00' ,p<!'t<;- . 09, &bu.. ;a'0e2... '.9.>...,,;- ;09.9J ~ a ~,~ i96'J- J . HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN Dileo. IHe 300 0 ~ /61J'/~ 300 I SCALE 1" = 300' PlANNING 'Kl179 Huemekens St. Stite ZOO ENQNEIRlNG Son ""'" Co 92121 SURVEYING PH(858)ss&<SOO. FX(8S8)........ Jt\OrJ5\.tmap\iP 05-1 PH , SHT Qr./JWG W.o.l .,-4 BEARING N 39'07'IS"W N 71'41'00'[ N 84'07'43"W N 10'13'03"[ N 28'4S'IS"[ N 71'16'30"[ N 29'14'14'[ N 21'59'35"[ N 80'S2'OO"W N 2724'19"[ N 32'01 '46"[ N 15'59'55"[ N 06'36'10"W N 80'50'30"[ N 68'13'37"W N 74'56'47'[ N 88'30'00"W SHEET 1 OF 1 DISTANC[ 39.22' 56.55' 5.59' 72.72' 62.9S' 19.01' 95.60' 10.05' 93.S4' 109.05' 101.25' 18,21' 12.97' 165.01' 87.78' 74.35' 38.00' TRUE POINT OF B[GINNING (PARCEL ':4' N OO"ll'/I"W 55.54' 0 0 I"l it-: II . - ~ .- W ....I < U Vl 21 ~ 600 900 I I EXHIBIT T LEGAL DESCRIPTION THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 21 IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "An (OS-1) COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 21 AS DEPICTED ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 10018, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON APRIL 18,1985; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 21 NORTH 00011'11" WEST, 661.87 FEET (RECORD NORTH 00010'09" WEST, 662.02 FEET PER RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 10018) TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22 OF SAID TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING SOUTH 00011'11" EAST, 55.54 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY SIDELINE OF THAT CERTAIN 250.00 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY PER DOCUMENT FILED IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ON MARCH 7, 1960 AS FILE NO. 47403 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 21 ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY SIDELINE SOUTH 40031'14" WEST, 334.92 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY SIDELINE THE FOLLOWING 43 COURSES: 1. THENCE NORTH 6036'10" WEST, 12.97 FEET; 2. THENCE NORTH 15059'55" EAST, 18.21 FEET; 3. THENCE NORTH 32001'46" EAST, 101.25 FEET; 4. THENCE NORTH 27"24'19" EAST, 109.05 FEET; 5. THENCE NORTH 80052'00" WEST, 93.54 FEET; 6. THENCE SOUTH 29014'14" WEST, 95.60 FEET; 7. THENCE SOUTH 21059'35" WEST, 10.05 FEET; 8. THENCE SOUTH 71016'30" WEST, 19.01 FEET; 9. THENCE SOUTH 28045'15" WEST, 62.95 FEET; PAGE 1 OF 5 :ov M:12091\004\Legal DescriptionslA04 Par A (OS1).doc WO 2091-4 1217100 / ~ A (t 10. THENCE SOUTH 10'13'03" WEST, 72.72 FEET; 11. THENCE NORTH 84'07'43" WEST, 5.59 FEET; 12. THENCE SOUTH 71'41'00" WEST, 56.55 FEET; 13. THENCE NORTH 88'15'48" WEST, 42.62 FEET; 14. THENCE SOUTH 68'40'17" WEST, 62.16 FEET; 15. THENCE NORTH 89'42'43" WEST, 16.70 FEET; 16. THENCE NORTH 60'23'17" WEST, 34.52 FEET; 17. THENCE NORTH 72'32'15" WEST, 32.37 FEET; 18. THENCE NORTH 87'03'14" WEST, 24.92 FEET; 19. THENCE SOUTH 79'09'00" WEST, 143.88 FEET; 20. THENCE SOUTH 71'14'51" WEST, 104.24 FEET; 21. THENCE SOUTH 68'30'18" WEST, 247.22 FEET; 22. THENCE SOUTH 52'01'46" WEST, 62.92 FEET; 23. THENCE SOUTH 77'30'05" WEST, 67.24 FEET; 24. THENCE NORTH 18'56'00" WEST, 144.00 FEET; 25. THENCE NORTH 4'00'00" EAST, 52.00 FEET; 26. THENCE NORTH 25'00'00" EAST, 63.00 FEET; 27. THENCE NORTH 19'30'32" EAST, 36.11 FEET; 28. THENCE NORTH 3'32'00" WEST, 171.00 FEET; 29. THENCE NORTH 4'38'00" EAST, 143.00 FEET; 30. THENCE NORTH 62'00'00" EAST, 49.00 FEET; 31. THENCE NORTH, 100.00 FEET; 32. THENCE NORTH 16'00'00" WEST, 100.00 FEET; 33. THENCE NORTH 33'40'00" WEST, 70.00 FEET; 34. THENCE NORTH 49'00'00" WEST, 96.00 FEET; 35. THENCE NORTH 34'00'00" WEST, 38.00 FEET; 36. THENCE NORTH 43'00'49" WEST, 72.47 FEET; 37. THENCE NORTH 33'43'00" WEST, 155.00 FEET; 38. THENCE NORTH 32'20'00" WEST, 153.00 FEET; 39. THENCE NORTH 39'07'15" WEST, 39.22 FEET; 40. THENCE NORTH 30'00'00" EAST, 59.00 FEET; 41. THENCE NORTH 21 'OO'OQ" WEST, 132.00 FEET; 42. THENCE NORTH 39'00'00" WEST, 34.00 FEET; 43. THENCE NORTH 1'00'00" WEST, 116.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED TO PAGE 2 OF 5 :DV M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptionslA04 Par A (OS1).doc WO 2091-4 1217/00 ,>!".,....- ~"l .f: TRIMARK PACIFIC - SAN MIGUEL LLC, (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "TRIMARK LAND"), FILED IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ON SEPTEMBER 10,1997 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1997-0439631 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 50037'13" WEST, 683.23 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT COURSE DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED AS "SOUTH 50037'15" EAST, 2090.41 FEET"; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID "TRIMARK LAND" THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES: 1. SOUTH 50037'13" EAST (RECORD SOUTH 50037'15" EAST), 683.23 FEET; 2. THENCE SOUTH 72003'57" EAST, 575.53 FEET (RECORD SOUTH 72003'52" EAST, 575.50 FEET); 3. THENCE SOUTH 45000'07" EAST, 691.99 FEET (RECORD SOUTH 45000'28" EAST, 692.02 FEET) TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 23.972 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A-1" THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 21 IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING ATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 21 AS DEPICTED ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 10018, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON APRIL 18,1985; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 21 NORTH 00011'11" WEST, 661.87 FEET (RECORD NORTH 00010'09" WEST, 662.02 FEET PER RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 10018) TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22 OF SAID TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST; THENCE RETRACING SOUTH 00011'11" EAST, 55.54 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY SIDELINE OF THAT CERTAIN 250.00 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY PER PAGE 3 OF 5 :DV M:\2091\004\Legal DescrlptionslA04 Par A (OS1).doc WO 2091-4 12f7/00 / [, fJ 16 DOCUMENT FILED IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ON MARCH 7,1960 AS FILE NO. 47403 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 21 ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY SIDELINE SOUTH 40031'14" WEST, 334.92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY SIDELINE THE FOLLOWING 31 COURSES: 1. THENCE NORTH 6036'10" WEST, 12.97 FEET; 2. THENCE NORTH 15059'55" EAST, 18.21 FEET; 3. THENCE NORTH 32001'46" EAST, 101.25 FEET; 4. THENCE NORTH 27"24'19" EAST, 109.05 FEET; 5. THENCE NORTH 80052'00" WEST, 93.54 FEET; 6. THENCE SOUTH 29014'14" WEST, 95.60 FEET; 7. THENCE SOUTH 21059'35" WEST, 10.05 FEET; 8. THENCE SOUTH 71016'30" WEST, 19.01 FEET; 9. THENCE SOUTH 28045'15" WEST, 62.95 FEET; 10. THENCE SOUTH 10013'03" WEST, 72.72 FEET; 11. THENCE NORTH 84"07'43" WEST, 5.59 FEET; 12. THENCE SOUTH 71041'00" WEST, 56.55 FEET; 13. THENCE NORTH 88015'48" WEST, 42.62 FEET; 14. THENCE SOUTH 68040'17" WEST, 62.16 FEET; 15. THENCE NORTH 89042'43" WEST, 16.70 FEET; 16. THENCE NORTH 60023'17" WEST, 34.52 FEET; 17. THENCE NORTH 72032'15" WEST, 32.37 FEET; 18. THENCE NORTH 87003'14" WEST, 24.92 FEET; 19. THENCE SOUTH 79009'00" WEST, 143.88 FEET; 20. THENCE SOUTH 71014'51" WEST, 104.24 FEET; 21. THENCE SOUTH 68"30'18" WEST, 247.22 FEET; 22. THENCE SOUTH 52001'46" WEST, 62.92 FEET; 23. THENCE NORTH 66010'37" EAST, 204.07 FEET; 24. THENCE NORTH 72"00'46" EAST, 194.49 FEET; 25. THENCE NORTH 80050'30" EAST, 165.01 FEET; 26. THENCE SOUTH 68013'37" EAST, 87.78 FEET; 27. THENCE NORTH 74056'47" EAST, 74.35 FEET; 28. THENCE SOUTH 88030'00" EAST, 38.00 FEET; 29. THENCE NORTH 72000'00" EAST, 38.13 FEET; PAGE 4 OF 5 :DV M:12091\004\Legal DescriptionslA04 Par A (OS1).doc WO 2091-4 12f7/00 " 7' ~) 1'- --,' 30. THENCE SOUTH 39033'21" EAST, 68.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID 250.00 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY; 31. THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH 40031'14" EAST, 111.52 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL "A-1" CONTAINS 0.984 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Cl fA V..... t'2..-cc,.oo ZD=;;~;-- L.S.6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. PAGE50F5 :DV M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptionslA04 Par A (OS1).doc WO 2091-4 1217/00 /,--"),<).{f LEGAL DESCRIPTION THOSE PORTIONS OF THE NORTH HALF OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 28, IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "C" (OS-6) COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 28 AS DEPICTED ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON JULY 9, 1981, SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 89039'12" WEST, 2660.95 FEET (NORTH 89039'18" WEST, 2660.53 FEET PER RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752) FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 28; THENCE, SOUTH 02012'55" EAST, 1156.19 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE FOllOWING 9 COURSES: 1. SOUTH 06008'40" WEST, 10.49 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "A"; 2. THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 06008'40" WEST, 245.98 FEET; 3. THENCE SOUTH 19047'29" WEST, 168.57 FEET; 4. THENCE SOUTH 50052'13" WEST, 126.70 FEET; 5. THENCE SOUTH 19017'15" WEST, 259.77 FEET; 6. THENCE SOUTH 43002'00" EAST, 117.42 FEET; 7. THENCE SOUTH 18018'44" WEST, 246.62 FEET; 8. THENCE SOUTH 23020'00" WEST, 183.80 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 11044'34" WEST TO SAID POINT; 9. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26047'46" A DISTANCE OF 187.07 FEET; PAGE 1 OF 4 :TN M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptiooslA07 Par C (OS6).doc WO 2091-2 1217/00 . III.. j'q ~., , I EXHIBIT T THENCE NORTH 74056'48" EAST, 311.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT LAND CONDEMNED TO SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY PER FINAL DECREE OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED JULY 3, 1963 AS FILE/PAGE NO. 96521 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AS SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES; 1. NORTH 40031'08" EAST, 990.83 FEET; 2. THENCE SOUTH 49029'52" EAST, 279.94 FEET; 3. THENCE SOUTH 00018'38" WEST, 301.58 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY ALONG THE FOLLOWING 19 COURSES: 1. NORTH 55010'27" EAST, 103.67 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.00 FEET; 2. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14022'42" A DISTANCE OF 127.98 FEET; 3. THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 07020'00" WEST, 32.44 FEET; 4. THENCE NORTH 19030'00" WEST, 90.00 FEET; 5. THENCE NORTH 00050'00" WEST, 314.00 FEET; 6. THENCE NORTH 26020'00" WEST, 136.16 FEET; 7. THENCE NORTH 13034'25" WEST, 26.00 FEET; 8. THENCE NORTH 41024'00" WEST, 184.17 FEET; 9. THENCE NORTH 18050'00" EAST, 14.05 FEET; 10. THENCE NORTH 02000'00" EAST, 78.00 FEET; 11. THENCE NORTH 14000'00" WEST, 49.00 FEET; 12. THENCE NORTH 48024'00" WEST, 61.08 FEET; 13. THENCE SOUTH 88048'05" WEST, 222.44 FEET; 14. THENCE NORTH 54029'06" WEST, 439.31 FEET; 15. THENCE NORTH 72020'55" WEST, 302.82 FEET; 16. THENCE SOUTH 78008'17" WEST, 104.51 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "B"; PAGE 2 OF 4 :TN M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptionslA07 Par C (OS6).doc WO 2091-2 1217/00 /blJ ?) 17. THENCE SOUTH 03020'59" EAST, 267.35 FEET; 18. THENCE SOUTH 10035'42" EAST, 184.94 FEET; 19. THENCE SOUTH 06008'40" EAST, 15.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM A 30.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND LYING EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "B"; THENCE ALONG THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED ABOVE: 1. SOUTH 03020'59" EAST, 267.35 FEET; 2. THENCE SOUTH 10035'42" EAST, 184.94 FEET; 3. THENCE SOUTH 06008'40" EAST, 15.00 FEET TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "A" AND THE POINT OF TERMINUS. THE EASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID 30.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND IS TO BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE NORTHERLY IN THE CERTAIN COURSE DESCRIBED ABOVE AS SOUTH 78008'17" WEST, 104.51 FEET. PARCEL "C" CONTAINS 31.039 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "C-1" A 30.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND LYING EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT POINT "B" AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL "C" ABOVE; THENCE ALONG THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL "C" ABOVE: 4. SOUTH 03020'59" EAST, 267.35 FEET; 5. THENCE SOUTH 10035'42" EAST, 184.94 FEET; 6. THENCE SOUTH 06008'40" EAST, 15.00 FEET TO POINT "A" AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL "C" ABOVE AND THE POINT OF TERMINUS. PAGE 3 OF 4 :TN M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptionslA07 Par C (OS6).doc . A .. ; WO 2091-2 12fl/00 ." 0 . THE EASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID 30.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND IS TO BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE NORTHERLY IN THE CERTAIN COURSE DESCRIBED IN PARCEL "C" ABOVE AS SOUTH 78008'17" WEST, 104.51 FEET. PARCEL "C-1" CONTAINS 0.332 ACRE MORE OR LESS. U-~ DANA MICHAEL S GUIN L.S.6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO,INC. PAGE40F4 :TN M:12091\004\Legal DescriptionslA07 Par C (OS6).doc WO 2091-2 1211100 / i. fe,: .:7. "'" '.t:llc. ').\ ').J;;- //1,.' "'/l ~ ').e \ .j9'~'j. ~ .\ 89 95 \' 660. 'j. E 1/4 ~w>.tORNERN~ SEC. 2~ . OF FRACTI'~7"E 104.51 jO.jj N 7B'OB SHEET 1 OF 2 N /2'20' J02.82' 551y N S.r29'o6"W 439.31 PARCEL "C-1" 000 j' SEE SHEET NO. 2 ~. !'v~ ." ". ./:t~ $2 ~ T.p.a.B, 0 0 0 10 :I:. cpe:: ):;>' :z.):;> 0 -g,S 0 ...,. '"tl-CP :I:. G ......\. ):;>~):;> 8 CP,......\. N rn 'JJ II ~ 'JJ):;> 0 ~ . ):;>0 ~ :z.......\. ~ Ol :I:.m m l 0 .t:>- o 5.00' -POINT ';4" N 06'0~'40" [ 271.47 PARCEL "c" (05-6) N 50'52'13" [ ,\.70' N 19'17'15"[ 259.77' "'il 0'00 . 'o~ ~ A"SA'}.' , ,1. ~ s::i g} J<J .~ .... h ~ ~ . HUNSAKER ~ !>~~?~~~ YES ~ \ ~ z _N 'Xl"" -!'> ""0> "" N. "" ~/ P\.AHI'ING 'ItI7'9 I-b!mebns 5t. SWte: 200 ENONlERlHG Son 1Jiq~ C. 9l1l1 SURVEYING PH!BS8)sS"'SOO' fl((BS8)SS8-"'... R:\Ol.J5\bIcrp\'" PH 2 SHT DI.owc w.D.I 2091-4 ,/' ~ (/ ~.b .. IJ) fT\ fT\ IJ) ::l:. fT\ ~ z. o -" HUNSAKER & ASSOClA TES SAN Dileo, INe. PlANNING 10119 -... St. .... 200 ENaNllRlNG Son ""'" Co 92121 SU1lVEYING PHl858l553-4S00' fX(BSll)SS8."'" R:\DU5\axr,\m' PH t $Hr DZ.lW1G w.D./ 209'''''' lis \:i g; .tv .~ ... h ~ ~ SHEET 2 OF 2 PARCEL "c" N 19'~O'OO'W 90.00 'W N 0720'00 32.#' - tV.? - - 3~.:.?~:51~" --!!'..r~ 4~ .. .f>"'$ /,,~ (.,.. /O/'J?:"" /<..> ."U~ oc-. /" SS' '.96'- OJ /0- '6'..>_ <..>. ~ ~ 200 0 ~ 200 400 I SCALE 1" = 200' 600 I LEGAL DESCRIPTION THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SOUTH HALF OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 21 AND PORTIONS OF THE NORTH HALF OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 28, IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS: PARCEL "0" (OS-7) COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 28 AS DEPICTED ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752, FilED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON JULY 9,1981, SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 89039'12" WEST, 2660.95 FEET (NORTH 89039'18" WEST, 2660.53 FEET PER RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752) FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 28; THENCE, SOUTH 02012'55" EAST, 1156.19 FEET; THENCE NORTH 06008'40" EAST, 15.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10035'42" WEST, 184.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03020'59" WEST, 267.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT ALSO DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "A"; THENCE ALONG THE FOLLOWING 27 COURSES: 1. CONTINUING NORTH 03020'59" WEST, 12.87 FEET; 2. THENCE NORTH 57034'46" WEST, 144.18 FEET; 3. THENCE NORTH 53038'30" WEST, 131.13 FEET; 4. THENCE NORTH 42010'11" WEST, 133.49 FEET; 5. THENCE NORTH 36039'39" WEST, 195.02 FEET; 6. THENCE NORTH 08059'23" EAST, 302.14 FEET; 7. THENCE NORTH 06054'26" EAST, 450.19 FEET; 8. THENCE SOUTH 75028'22" EAST, 112.89 FEET; 9. THENCE SOUTH 83042'21" EAST, 96.02 FEET; 10. THENCE SOUTH 56044'16" EAST, 313.37 FEET; 11. THENCE SOUTH 25024'51" WEST, 134.11 FEET; 12. THENCE SOUTH 19026'40" EAST, 56.45 FEET; PAGE 1 OF 3 :JR M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptionslA01 Par 0 (OS7).doc W02091-4 1217100 /i~r1 ,~- 13. THENCE SOUTH 31053'38" EAST, 50.57 FEET; 14. THENCE SOUTH 64013'38" EAST, 269.23 FEET; 15. THENCE NORTH 89033'57" EAST, 99.91 FEET; 16. THENCE NORTH 63034'19" EAST, 153.23 FEET; 17. THENCE SOUTH 89040'31" EAST, 165.92 FEET; 18. THENCE SOUTH 59019'29" EAST, 102.77 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "B"; 19. THENCE SOUTH 38015'00" WEST, 352.75 FEET; 20. THENCE SOUTH 13020'00" WEST, 56.37 FEET; 21. THENCE SOUTH 16040'42" EAST, 590.02 FEET; 22. THENCE SOUTH 72016'00" EAST, 174.17 FEET; 23. THENCE SOUTH 48024'00" EAST, 14.92 FEET; 24. THENCE SOUTH 88048'05" WEST, 222.44 FEET; 25. THENCE NORTH 54029'06" WEST, 439.31 FEET; 26. THENCE NORTH 72020'55" WEST, 302.82 FEET; 27. THENCE SOUTH 78008'17" WEST, 104.51 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM A 30.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED ABOVE AS POINT "A" AND POINT "B", COURSES NUMBERED 1 THROUGH 18. THE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 78008'17" EAST THROUGH SAID POINT "A" AND TERMINATE NORTHEASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS SOUTH 38015'00" WEST THROUGH SAID POINT "B". PARCEL "0" CONTAINS 20.304 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PAGE20F3 :TN M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptionslA01 Par 0 (OS7).doc WO 2091-4 12/6100 /6r9 A '.,1 A , ,~/ PARCEL "0-1" A 30.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED IN PARCEL D ABOVE AS POINT "A" AND POINT "B", COURSES NUMBERED 1 THROUGH 18. THE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 78008'17" EAST THROUGH SAID POINT "A" AND TERMINATE NORTHEASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS SOUTH 38015'00" WEST THROUGH SAID POINT"B". PARCEL "D-1" CONTAINS 1.980 ACRES MORE OR LESS. ~~b IH= DANA MICHAEL SE UIN L.S.6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. , PAGE 3 OF 3 :TN M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptionslA01 Par 0 (OS7).doc WO 2091-4 12/6100 /; I~ ,? 7 ,~. ., 9 ~,Cl ,;,;.1< ~ ~ ~, .,;Cl ,'!l 1!';'O ,;,. ?" ~ ~ ."Q,<b ~ ,;l<.l<."'~. ,.. ";)1., '?~ '01 "< r.. ~ S'l-Cl ,'I-' ~ ~Cl ~ \ \ 0, - t:i ~ k<J <0 ..... 'I- !n <0 <:> =<: ,f<J ::-!. ~''I- ""- !'i~ ~~ =<: -1- /: u'.".'f:lo ~:~ ~ ~ :r: o z: ~/;f) -1Ul UlC1.l :::)<1; (!l:r: ~a.. ~ z: <C C1.l II N 75'28'22"W 112.89' N 83'42'21"W 96.02' >Y S....\ ~.,,..,... ~6'#.- PARCEL \ ''[)_ 1 n \ \ \ - -- P,O.C. NW CORNER, NE 1/4 OF FRAcnONAL SEC. 28 \\ ~ ~ PARCEL nDn ;;; \ \ (05-7) ':; \ \__ nE L>JE "^', ~ \ \ ..J>t iO. ' "Iv,?" -fr \ + ,,~. N 7.?:?0~5'W T.P.O.B. .]02.82' \ N 0J'20'59"W 267.35' ~ . . eg o N 10'35'42"W 184.94' ~ \ N 06'08'40"E 15.00' HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES 5" N D It COol N C. PlANNING 101i'9 ~ St. Slite 200 ENaNllllNC Son o;,go, Co !lZ121 SURvtYING PH(8S8)558-4SOO' fX(esa)s58-llIW It'.'''''_''' '" , SHr 0JJJWr; "'(J./ :Jt19,... 200 0 ~ /04:1, T 11 S, R 1 W, 88M ~l> . l.i/ G (PROp' U~l. VSCD/~OA..D L4 ~.. _rifE, II \SZ056:~1 N 72'16'oo.",<a. 17".17' 222.44 N /lB'48 05 NUMBER BEARING OISTANCE Ll N 64"13'J8"W 269.23' L2 N 89'33'57"[ 99.91' L3 N 6J'34'19"E 153.23' L4 N 89"40'31 "W 165.92' L5 N 59'19'29"W 102.77' L6 N 48"24'OO"W 14.92' 200 400 I I SCALE ,. = 200' 600 I DEC-13-2000 10: 37 1-11 H.1..........I~~ ... "'.............-........--.... -- 858 sse 4500 P. 02/13 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THOSE PORTIONS OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 28, IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "E" COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 28 AS DEPICTED ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON JULY 9, 1981, SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 89039'12" WEST, 2660.95 FEET (NORTH 89039'1S" WEST, 2660.53 FEET PER RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752) FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 28; THENCE ALONG THE FOLLOWING 5 COURSES: 1. SOUTH 02012'55" EAST,1156,19 FEET; 2. THENCE SOUTH 06008'40" WEST, 256.47 FEET: 3. THENCE SOUTH 19047'29" WEST, 168.57 FEET: 4. THENCE SOUTH 50052'13" WEST, 126.70 FEET; 5. THENCE SOUTH 19"17'1S" WEST. 189.56 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE FOLLOWING 13 COURSES: 6. NORTH 57054'30" WEST, 138.53 FEET TO'A POINT DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "A"; 7. THENCE SOUTH 18057'44" WEST, 56.83 FEET; 8. THENCE SOUTH 46"35'00" WEST, 114.15 FEET; 9. THENCE SOUTH 83000'00" WEST, 127.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 172.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 70013'24" WEST TO SAID POINT, SAID POINT DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "e"i 10. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39001'52" A DISTANCE OF 117.17 FEET; 11. THENCE SOUTH 27017'01" WEST, 286.30 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "0"; PAGE 1 OF 3 /1. LJ.. ".Q.1"1.' 'JR U"",.,Ill04ILeaaI DesctlDtIonslAO!l Par E ITar Plantl.clac · n f DEC-13-2000 10:37 HUNSAKER 8. ASSOC I AlES SD 858 558 4500 P.03/13 12. THENCE SOUTH 66027'41" EAST, 166.26 FEET; 13. THENCE SOUTH 33013'20" EAST, 7.20 FE.ET; 14. THENCE SOUTH 66027'41" EAST, 167.06 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "0"; 15. THENCE NORTH 23020'00" EAST, 185.60 FEET; 16. THENCE NORTH 18018'44" EAST, 246.62 FEET; 17. THENCE NORTH 43002'00" WEST, 117.42 FEET; 18. THENCE NORTH 19017'15" EAST, 70.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, THE NORTHWESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED ABOVE AS POINT "A" AND POINT "B", COURSES NUMBERED 7 THROUGH 9. THE SOUTHEASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE NORTHEASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 57054'30" WEST THROUGH SAID POINT "A" AND TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN THAT HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED 172.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, COURSE NUMBER 10, THROUGH SAID POINT "B", ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BElWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED ABOVE AS POINT "C" AND POINT "D", COURSE~ NUMBERED 12 THROUGH 14. THE NORTHEASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE NORTHWESTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 27017'01. EAST THROUGH SAID POINT 'C' AND TO TERMINATE SOUTHEASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 23020'00" EAST THROUGH SAID POINT "D'. PARCEL "E" CONTAINS 3.636 ACRES MORE OR LESS, PAGE 2 OF 3 :JR M:12091ID04\L8gal OesaiptionslAD5 Par E (Tar Planl).doc /6 It. -/00 DEC-13-2000 10:38 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P. 04/13 PARCEL "e.1" A 10.00 FOOT-WIDE STRIP OF LAND, THE NORTHWESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED IN PARCEL "E" ABOVE AS POINT "A" AND POINT "B", COURS~S NUMBERED 7 THROUGH 9. THE SOUTHEASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE NORTHEASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 57054'30" WEST THROUGH SAID POINT "A" AND TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN THAT HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED 172.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, COURSE NUMBER 10. THROUGH SAID POINT "B", PARCEL "E-1" CO NT AINS 0.069 ACRE MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "E-2" A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND. THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED IN PARCEL "E" ABOVE AS POINT "C" AND POINT "0", COURSES NUMBERED 12 THROUGH 14, THE NORTHEASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHAlL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE NORTHWESTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 27017'01" EAST THROUGH SAID POINT "C" AND TO TERMINATE SOUTHEASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 23020'00" EAST THROUGH SAID POINT "0", PARCEL "E-2" CONTAINS 0.078 ACRE MORE OR LESS. ~ A JLti:..::....... ,">.-,.,. =, DANA MICHAEL SE UIN L.S.6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. PAGE30F3 :JR M:I20911D04\LegaJ Desc:rlpllons\A05 Par E (Tar Planl).doc .fJ hl/ " /. " DEC-13-2000 10:38 o ~ 100 SC1.\...E 1" = 100' - o o ..- u . ..- \Jj ...I < o VI N \ HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SD 200 [ T 11 s. R 1 W saM .------\ ,--"'-- \ .. \ \ \ \ \. \ \ \ \ \ \ . \ \ \ \ ---~~ \ \ ~..<:) \ }~ \ ~<(-~~ vY> :\~' ~ ~ ~~~0 i>>'t:J~ __vy.\)~~ .?Y: \ \ /-\ \ i \ \ -------\ \ \ ----- --T-- /) / , I / / / i l . i , , , I ......../ PI.NtNtrIJ 101P!I....... 5t. s.a 2DO 1NCl_ Son Dlqo. co mn U\llYlNC PHI..e.......I$-- \ 1\\' \ L-j I I " J l, -, 300 1 t,.w tElfNCJr. ,'/'.o.C, 'rvjCTlo~ .. V4_ SEc, 28 \ , \ \ '. , \ , \ \ 858 558 4500 P.05/13 S1IEET , OF 2 \ N 89'39'72" W 2660.95' ~I__ - ^--~~ --y -28 127 '55' VI N 02"\ t, 1156. ;..., ~ to :Q lu . .~ ! (:l ~ / . L"- ~/;" ~#~ ,1,'" /~ I /~ I ~ : . ~, / :t\~.(" I .tl~~;)O ~ ?''\~- f;' 1) 1----1 I I ----1 1--- / . , i ,I-- / / ~- , . ~' , , I .. 'e.., If...... POINr ~. to/:. / ~ ~.~ /.~ , ~I~ / "..... ~ ,.~ I. i'i"'! .,....:>I.~. I~ ,/.......... ~~ ~ "'......- /~ .,............ <6''<'l=~ . HUNSAKER 10.00' is' 1 & ASSOCIA TIS .....tP~7;g,;1~ ,.... 0 II c: 0. Il'I Co ....,. :......... ,t' '''-.., , SEE SHrEr 2/ :'~, /l DEC-13-2000 10:38 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P.06/13 SHffT 2 OF 2 \ 100 0 ~ 100 200 I I SCALE ,. = 100' 300 I , / , ........ / , I '..-/ '- "', '. -~ (R) --- paINT "S" --\ \ \ , . \ \ ~~ \ \ /~fi'" ,/ ..,,1,' ~~...() \ '\ " ~",'(J , \ ,~ ~ \ <'l ~ ~V'''' tel- \",,- ~~l>' ~ ! :'<,p / 'P "'" i ~\$ ~~ 121 ~ .{0\..~~ ~~y.l>' ___--../S \F el>' ~ ~ ~.- -.... ~ -rr to- ~~ IV e"..c>.>. ....... 00]1 '66-</'-'" ___-=::: ...._~ 0 ~ . ....-:::- ......... ~A t ,. ::- ' r---..I .........., ......... . ~l" ~ I---..J ----- ......... -..... ........~04lJ ~______'~ .-'" I . HUNSAKER ~--2" ---.---------. ~~~9f~~ PA ..........~---_____ __-..--. ~__ ...... ..__.' ;0- ___ -....._,,::::;.~_. -- .------- T.P.o.a . 8 ... n . ... ~ o II) .' ..- __11._- ~ "'1IIFo QlIZIII e__ .....~ .-- --.I!dIII. \III l .j .t,) .r .,> ,,-,-'. LEGAL DESCRIPTION THOSE PORTIONS OF THE NORTH HALF OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 28, IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "F" COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 28 AS DEPICTED ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752, FILED IN THE OFFICE OFTHE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON JULY 9, 1981, SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 89039'12" WEST, 2660.95 FEET (NORTH 89039'18" WEST, 2660.53 FEET PER RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752) FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 28; THENCE, SOUTH 02012'55" EAST, 1156.19 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT ALSO DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "B"; THENCE ALONG THE FOLLOWING 14 COURSES: 1. SOUTH 06008'40" WEST, 256.47 FEET; 2. THENCE SOUTH 19047'29" WEST, 168.57 FEET; 3. THENCE SOUTH 50052'13" WEST, 126.70 FEET; 4. THENCE SOUTH 19017'15" WEST, 189.56 FEET; 5. THENCE NORTH 57054'30" WEST, 138.53 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "A"; 6. THENCE NORTH 49025'00" EAST, 60.39 FEET; 7. THENCE NORTH 18020'00" EAST, 159.90 FEET; 8. THENCE NORTH 03025'00" EAST, 143.90 FEET; 9. THENCE NORTH 10025'00" EAST, 164.50 FEET; 10. THENCE NORTH 61030'00" EAST, 42.50 FEET; 11. THENCE NORTH 89025'00" EAST, 71.35 FEET; 12. THENCE NORTH 62038'00" EAST, 99.85 FEET; 13. THENCE NORTH 25040'00. EAST, 35.90 FEET; 14. THENCE NORTH 78032'00" EAST, 15.70 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PAGE 1 OF 2 :TN M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptionslA02 Par F (Tar Planll.doc I C, A '-'1M WD 2091-2 1217100 v. " . . EXCEPTING THEREFROM A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED ABOVE AS POINT "A" AND POINT "B", COURSES NUMBERED 6 THROUGH 14. THE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 57054'30" WEST THROUGH SAID POINT "A" AND TERMINATE EASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 06008'40" EAST THROUGH SAID POINT "B". PARCEL "F" CONTAINS 2.213 ACRES MORE OR LESS PARCEL "F.1" A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED IN PARCEL "F" ABOVE AS POINT "A" AND POINT "B", COURSES NUMBERED 6 THROUGH 14. THE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 57054'30" WEST THROUGH SAID POINT "A" AND TERMINATE EASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 06008'40" EAST THROUGH SAID POINT "B". PARCEL "F-1" CONTAINS 0.181 ACRE MORE OR LESS Q~tzA~ \<..- 7-<CQ DANA MICHAEL SEGUIN L.S. 6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. PAGE20F2 :TN M:\2091\004\Legal DescriptionslA02 Par F (Tar Planl).doc \ . - WO 2091-2 1217100 ,) ~ I..' I ------~ , Nil' N 89'39'12" W OF F~RNcR, Nf-o.C. I 2660.95'"""", C170"t4L 1/4_ -j'--,21JE: SEc. 28 f 28127 '55" 'II ~ I'l 02'1~, "" ""s. 1156.1 "'0- Jto. nE LINE ONL Y '-90_<" -----------\ ; ~/':^D1 ,/--- \, g-'';J "'r\-,g " -<,<(-.~~~O~ " ~~ <(-.~', ''-1\0 0<;'\... <:>. ~ " -~~~ ~\~y\~0:-----1/ 0" 0~ ~ _oo'lt. \ (!loljo'; i ~ 6 j,~' ! \ \ t..., , i .! l ~..I \ .<:5fi5' i ;G~ ~.... ; , ; ----------, ~ , ' '\/ PARCEL) "(" '- , , , ~ "- ~t/. ; ! t..., i......... --.........--- ./ ...........;" .....--~-----~ ~ /' . <::>. [;j !">~ _____ j ~ i !q....; J-_____! 9:;= i ~ ~ i "if!~ , - ! / / / ! t..., ! ! / 0 0 ~ II . ~ W ...J 0<( U Vl i I I . <::> .<::> !<l /'_ t..., N... . ___, ~~;' ~--- , .<:s.- ~fS i ~~ ."io,' ~'<'J "''-., ~ '" ^- I ~~" N ..~'- III ............. HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES PI.ANNING 'm79 Huemektns Sl SUte 200 ENGN!W'<G Son llieg~ Co 92121 SUlVEYtNC PH(858~SOO' FX(8S8)5S8-'M"M R:\O',J5'.....'Df Tar PIatrt wrJg2.dt9 W.o.l209'-2 (' .< 100 0 ~ 100 I 1" = 200 300 I '~'-'-,- SAN Dileo. INC """ SCALE 100' /.-,/i , ) .... DEC-13-2000 10:39 HLNSpl/r:'O 0 ......................... 858 558 4500 P.07/13 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THOSE PORTIONS OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 28. IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL"G" COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 28 AS DEPICTED ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON JULY 9,1981, SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 89039'12" WEST. 2660.95 FEET (NORTH 89039'18. WEST, 2660.53 FEET PER RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752) FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 28; THENCE ALONG THE FOLLOWING 11 COURSES: 1. SOUTH 02012'55" EAST, 1156.19 FEET; 2. THENCE SOUTH 06008'40. WEST, 256.47 FEET; 3. THENCE SOUTH 19047'29. WEST, 168.57 FEET; 4. THENCE SOUTH S0052'13.WEST, 126.70 FEET; 5. THENCE SOUTH 19017'1S. WEST, 259.77 FEET; 6. THENCE SOUTH 43002'00. EAST, 117.42 FEETi 7. THENCE SOUTH 18018'44. WEST, 246.62 FEET; 8. THENCE SOUTH 23020'00" WEST, 185.60 FEET; 9. THENCE NORTH 66027'41. WEST, 167.06 FEET; 10. TH~NCE NORTH 33013'20" WEST. 7.20 FEETi 11. THENCE NORTH 66027'41. WEST, 166.26 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT ALSO DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "A"; THENCE ALONG THE FOLLOWING 26 COURSES: 12. NORTH 66027'41. WEST, 183.74 FEET; 13. THENCE NORTH 67045'00" WEST, 208.90 FEET; 14. THENCE NORTH 60015'00' WEST, 139.00 FEET; 15. THENCE NORTH 61'00'00' WEST, 279.26 FEET; PAGE 1 OF:3 /b tJ. Ii) 7 EXHIBIT JL DEC-13-2000 10:39 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P. 08/13 16. THENCE NORTH 50'14'19" WEST, 174.03 FEET; 17. THENCE NORTH 44'25'00" WEST, 86.00 FEET; , 8. THENCE NORTH 66'15'00" WEST, 48.62 FEET; 19. THENCE NORTH 45047'49" WEST, 126.26 FEET; 20. THENCE NORTH 7'29'36" WEST, 104.45 FEET; 21. THENCE NORTH 41003'41" WEST. 78.22 FEET; 22. THENCE NORTH 41001'25" EAST, 168.55 FEET; 23. THENCE NORTH 75"33'54" EAST, 22.78 FEET; 24. THENCE SOUTH 29045'00" EAST, 328.39 FEET; 25. THENCE SOUTH 51'50'00" EAST, 131.00 FEET; 26. THENCE SOUTH 29'25'00" EAST, 54.00 FEET; 27. THENCE SOUTH 66'35'00" EAST, 67.75 FEET; 28. THENCE SOUTH 53'25'00" EAST, 351.75 FEET; 29. THENCE NORTH 87038'00" EAST, 86.00 FEET; 30. THENCE NORTH 79035'00. EAST, 50.65 FEET; 31. THENCE NORTH 85'50'00" EAST, 60.08 FEET; 32. THENCE SOUTH 67'34'12" EAST, 58.64 FEET; 33. THENCE NORTH 76019'44" EAST; 85.60 FEET; 34. THENCE NORTH 520S5'OO" EAST, 70.95 FEET: 35. THENCE NORTH 83'00'00" EAST, 20.12 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 172.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 70'13'24" WEST TO SAID POINT, SAID POINT ALSO DESIGNATED HEREON AS POINT "8"; 36. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39'01'52" A DISTANCE OF 117.17 FEET; 37. THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 27'17'01" WEST. 286.30 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND. THE SOUTHERLY, WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED ABOVE AS POINT "A" AND POINT "B", , COURSES NUMBERED 12 THROUGH 35. ~,6.GE 2 OF 3 /611" ,;\ DEC-13-2000 10:40 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SD 8S8 558 4500 P.09/13 THE SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 27'17'01" EAST THROUGH SAID POINT "An AND TO TERMINATE NORTHEASTERLY IN THAT CERTAIN 172.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE DESCRIBED AS COURSE NUMBER 36 THROUGH SAID POINT "B", PARCEL "G" CONTAINS 5.174 ACRES, MORE OR LESS PARCEL "G-'" A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND. THE SOUTHERLY, WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THOSE CERTAIN COURSES DESCRIBED IN PARCEL "G" ABOVE AS POINT "A" AND POINT "S", COURSES NUMBERED 12 THROUGH 35. THE SIDELINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY IN A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 27'17'01" EAST THROUGH SAID POINT "A" AND TERMINATE NORTHEASTERLY IN THAT CERTAIN 172.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE DESCRIBED AS COURSE NUMBER 36 ABOVE THROUGH SAID POINT "B". PARCEL "G-1" CONTAINS 0.682 ACRE, MORE OR LESS u_~ DANA MICHAEL SEGUIN L.S.6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. \Z-\?'OO PAGE 3 OF 3 /61) /)1 DEC-13-2000 10:40 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SD 858 SS8 4S00 P.10/13 5HfrT , OF J \ ", "..... \ ~ ' . /\ ~\ i ~ \ .,/ \ \ ..--/ \ .---",\ 'i--~--- ,--\ ,...-1-- \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . . \t '- N 89'J9'72. W 2660.95' ___ I _ ^--21~ V 28 127 . N 02'12'55. W 7756.79' J 11 s, R 1 W, SSM . 0'1 ~~qr. ,,!,of. .,<.iAe4l sr-''f.- <=C:: 28 J ! i A<(> h..~ j ( ~rr>>P r ........... i / ~\~1 ~i.\"r::- --... "~.tr ~0~f..tO I " / ~Yl ~~~I '\' / y-/ / / '" <.., / ( ~ /r-"" ",j /~ 9k~ '~-J / / ,/ I' / / / . , ,/ .... .. . l~fC ~Ib'~ /~...,:. :!! ~ N 50'52'I.r 126.70' E N\'S"7"S. E 259.77' N 43"02"'0' ", W 117.42' - o ~ \I . .... / I ! N 2J'20'oof E ! 185.60' g -< o en N 66"27'" 7' W 767.06' N I . HUNSAKER ~ !'~~9~~TES JUItrNI<<i 10'111 tNlrntkw Sf. WIlt 2DO IN<MIllNG ........ Co..... allNJWllr: M-IlIr.lgI\wU.'iiIIl.~" 200 0 /JA- I),~ 200 SCAlE 1. .. 200' 400 600 I I 100 0 ~ 100 200 I I SCALE 1" = 100' 858 558 4500 P.11/13 5I/EIT2/lFJ\ 300 -.I DEC-13-2000 10:40 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SD - o o ... B . ... / / cHULA VJ61~~T-l1S./~~4 SAN MIGUEL RANCH ) pHASE a"',. / ,/ N~a~ q}!}~'J1~- .',~ PT. "8 ~~/ ,,~'l-...' l - . ,. ~\, / ~\~/ / ..._ I ... 1/ ~ ~ III ~ fIj \;t t Iv .~ ~ARc: ------A .~ ~------t;C, II '\ (1..1\ .~ #. . _ I ~ t~ '\~~ ~f:F'}O N 52'35'00. J. ~ ~~. ~ 70.9... . '\ B5;~9'""E \ N 76" . . /:~~ ~';'\' ~ ~1f~,1~ '^- 'o~ ,/ ,1 ~ / "'" ~ ",,' / ' \ \ \,; , PARCEL "G" \\ ,/' ~ PARCEL/ "G-1" \.(/ ~-6'<,...s;",.,c /. ~ ......... '-"<. I $2 --- '--...______ ZlQi"'"'<f,(' T.B.O.B. ~ I PT. ':4" . Ph ~'--... ~ ..::::::.......... ~Oc'h'~ .;;~ --........::::-' ~Ob...............4- .---.:::::::: "'-r ~ 6'6'"<> . .::::--'~ ~ :>~'~ '--...~........._ ~ h' ~t.(j"e. ~~ :':04lJ ~~ ~---~ --.... ~ 1'lI ---.......... ~ '~~~ti ~.........~ ~"., ..... "--- '~..... l::j \ . / / , I / I , ; / / / I ,I ---..j / '. / \ I r-J / ~/ I '> I . I . / / I / . . ,/' j" ..J.... / _______...I I , ,Ii / , ; I / / / .' HUNSAKER ~~~~~s ..- ...._s._... DU_ S1nlllop.ClIIIII Sla'VMI: ~. .. mJSIJII..WM ,),c) 11/ " \ \ \ \ \ ., ., \ \ ..............:\ \ %. \ "" \ IC ' . t. \ % \. N 07"~~~-- \;:l, \ !JH.-w - w 9' \ ~ ... , IC ' .. '0\ ...- \ , , ... \ ., \ ~- \..------ \ \ \ --------- \ . \ PA~C~ 858558 4500 P.12/13 SHEETJDFJ\ DEC-13-2000 10:41 HUNSAKER & ASSOC I ArES SD \ . g .-. \ " , \ \ \ .. ~. \ .~ \ <S'~ , 4- -=>- \ ~ "9' \ .....411.' -y ~ \ ~...~q, \. 4~ , -'0. .~ ~~(p,..>.. 4- \ --S:-""'~"9' "'''''o.e,.' "9'(9 ~ ,..>.. ~ 4,. \ ~..<\~ ~ .' ()I r T", ~ .,. , ~ '-). :>.>, , - Y.. " . 0$'.\ (\ c9 \ ~iS> ... o P' h , '\/ 1\ \ I \\. \'... , , \ '; .. \ \ \ " \ " , ," \ \.......... \ '" \ '\ " \ , , , '\ '\', .. , .. .. , ,," , '\ ' \ , , \ .. \ '\ .. '"" \ '\' .-.0 \ ,,\ ~-' ~~ \...o~ \ \ 'b;".... <(: \;'0 ~,~ ,~ ,\~. // \ 0 ',"" ~ ' \ ~ \\.' "/ t> ~', / '~~o'~\%:<~ '\ ~.... '~ ,Cb. 'b '\'0 ,\, '," ~/ " ,"'..... 9 , ",,~ .~ " ", ".",~. ''b PARe).. '\ ", ,,...... . c.l:, '}., \.' ". ,u_,,,", .. .. " " , " ".. , \" .''\.. , " , ., .. .. '~... " ,,', ~ " .. ~ '.. .. \......', '....,. ~ ,.."tTo.:""<' ", ''I '67-45'" .... "".. . II' ..... .... \2oe..ih' '., ... ......", /; A 'II,;';.;", \ ",' . HUNSAKER ~ !'~~9~TES M/M'lCi ....._5<-- INQIIIUIC 100 IlIop, c:.. mn S\Jl'lll'lHC ~SllC!:..~""_.._._ rfJ' E / N 1rtJ~/ 50.~ ... ~ I / I I ! " I i I Ju j / I . DEe-I 2-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:32 FAX 619 560 5465 P.02 R-731 Job-275 141002 SAN DIEGO BARREL CACTUS (Ferocactus viridescens) TRANSLOCATION PLAN FOR SAN MIGUEL RANCH SOUTH Prepared for: NNP - Trimark SaD Miguel RaDch, LLC 85 Argonaut, Suite 205 Aliso Viejo, California 92656 Attention: Stephen Hester Prepared by: Merkel & Associates, Inc. 5434 Ruffm Road San Diego, CA 92123 Contact: Melissa A. BOOMr Phone: (858) 560-5465 Fax: (858) 560-7779 Decemher 11, 2000 Keith W. Merkel, Principal Consultant f/(./\'/J ..., r; ;'!_) EXH!BIT ~ DEC-12-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12112/00 TUB 17: 32 FAX 619 560 5465 P.03 R-731 Job-275 1@003 San Die 0 Barrel Cactus Ferocactus viridescens Translocation Plan or San Mi el Ranch December 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................................................2 LOCATION ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 SAN DIEGO BARRELCAcruS NATURAL HISTORY AND STATUS................................................................................ 2 CONSERVATION .........................................................................................................................................................2 TRANSLOCA nON SITE SELECTION ................................................................................................................. 5 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 RESULTS .................. ....................................................... ........................................................................................... 5 Translocation Sile Pbysical Characterislics......................................................................................................................... S Translocation Site Biological Characteristics... ..... ............................................ .................................................................. 6 Translocation Site Buffering ....................... ....................................... .......................... ...........-........................................... 6 Comparison with Donor Sites ... ...................................................... ............... ..................................................................... 9 TRANSLOCATION METHODS..............................................................................................................................9 RESEEDING OF ABANDONED ACCESS ROADS ............................................................................................12 BARREL CACTUS MONITORING, MANAGEMENT, AND REPORTING .................................................. 13 METHODS ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 SCHEDULE FOR 120-DA Y MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING OF THE TRANSPLANTED CACTI POPULATION ............ 13 CONTINGENCY MEASURES ...................................................................................................................................... 14 LITERATURE CITED ............................................................................................................................................ 15 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map .............................................................................................................4 Figure 2. San Miguel Ranch South Parcel Soils Map .......................................................................... 7 Figure 3. Barrel Cactus Translocation and Donor Site Topography and Vegetation Communities.... 8 TABLE OF TABLES Table I. Seed Mix to Be Used for Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub Restoration................................ 12 . Merkel & Associates, Inc. 96-070-14 ii /61) ~ OEC-12-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:33 FAX 619 560 5465 P.04 R-731 Job-275 ~004 San Die 0 Barrel CacllLJ December 2000 SAN DIEGO BARREL CACTUS (Ferocactus viridescens) TRANSLOCATION PLAN FOR SAN MIGUEL RANCH SOUTH Merkel & Associates, Inc, December 2000 SUMMARY Where populations of San Diego Barrel Cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) exist within the development footprint, barrel cactus will be transplanted from the development area to the San Miguel Ranch Open Space Preserve (SMR-OSP). Translocation is expected to occur for all identified barrel cactus exceeding one inch in crown diameter. This document serves as the San Diego Barrel Cactus Translocation and Monitoring Plan for San Miguel Ranch South. It describes the methods proposed for colleetion and translocation of cacti and outlines the criteria for selection of the translocation site. In addition, transplant success criteria and monitoring and reporting requirements are described. The barrel cactus translocation receiver site is located entirely within the SMR-OSP area known as OS-3. OS-3 is the largest area of open space within San Miguel Ranch and is adjacent to residential development on only one side. The translocation area was chosen based on the site's designation as natural open space, ability to support naturally occurring populations, and its proven performance as a translocation site. In addition, the large area and lack of proposed development on several sides provide added insurance against illegal collection of cacti or impacts from intrusion. The topography, geology, and soils within the translocation area all appear to favor persistence of a translocated population. The translocation site includes the primary ridgeline and portions of the east and west facing slopes ofOS-3. It totals 67.6 acres and is occupied entirely by Coastal Sage Scrub with the exception of an abandoned dirt road that follows the ridgeline. The site currently supports a number of naturally occurring San Diego Barrel Cactus as well as cacti previously transplanted there in conjunction with Salt Creek Ranch development and soils testing within the San Miguel Ranch development area. Barrel cacti are currently found throughout the translocation area, but occur in the highest densities on the eastern slope ofOS-3. The translocation program will rely on techniques for marking, salvage, and transplantation of cacti that have proven successful in other transplantation programs. In addition, the effort relies on the identification of suitable receptor sites within OS-3 based on examination of the slope, aspect, soil types, and associated microhabitat conditions presently occupied by native stands of cacti within the area. Monitoring of the cacti is proposed to identify inceptive adaptive management strategies and remedial measures to increase the initial success of the translocation effort. Long-term monitoring will be the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Refuge System. The methods and frequency for long-term monitoring will be at the discretion of the refuge manager. Merkel & A,sociat.., Inc. 96-070./4 1 .1;1 - DEC-12-00 11:36 619 560 5465 ~12/00 TVE 17:33 FAX 619 560 5465 P.05 R-1J1 Job-U5 ~005 San Die 0 Barrel Cactus Ferocactus viridescens Translocation Plan or San Mi el Ranch December 2000 BACKGROUND LOCATION The 743-acre San Miguel Ranch South Parcel project site is located in Sections 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, and 28 of Township 17 South, Range 1 West of the USGS 7.5' Jamul Mountains Quadrangle, San Bernardino Base & Meridian (Figure I). The project site is located in an unincorporated area of San Diego County, adjacent to the northeastern border of the City of Chula Vista south of Sweetwater Reservoir and southwest of Mother Miguel Mountain. Proctor Valley Road provides access to the southern boundary of the site. Surrounding land uses are predominantly open space and residential or recreational development. The SMR-OSP lies adjacent to existing preserve lands under the management of the Otay Water District and San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E). The San Miguel Ranch Northern Parcel, part of the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge, lies north of the SDG&E preserve lands. These areas together comprise a substantive portion of the largest contiguous preserve area in the southwestern portion of the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) area. SAN DIEGO BARREL CACTUS NATURAL HISTORY AND STATUS San Diego Barrel Cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) is a sensitive species that occurs in the chaparral, sage scrub, vernal pool, and grassland habitats of San Diego County and Baja California, Mexico. The optimal habitat for this cactus appears to be Diegan Sage Scrub hillsides, often at the crest of slopes among cobbles. It is occasionally found on the periphery of vernal pools and in association with mima mound topography at Otay Mesa. This, presumably more mesic habitat (Stockpen gravelly clay loams), is unlike the very xeric situations where it is typically found. This barrel cactus utilizes a number of other soil types such as San Miguel-Exchequer rocky silt loarns and Redding gravelly loams. Common plant associates include Variegated Dudleya (Dudleya variegata), Foothill Needlegrass (Nasella lepida), and California Sagebrush (Artemisia calif arnica). This succulent is classified by the California Native Plant Society as a species which is rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere. It is threatened by urbanization, vehicles, and horticultural collecting (Skinner and Pavlick 1994). According to Reiser (1997), San Diego Barrel Cactus is declining but still grows at many locations. Once very common along the coast, many small and mid-sized populations are routinely being impacted by grading for urban development. Substantial portions ofall sizeable populations should be protected (Reiser 1997). CONSERVATION The City of Chula Vista has developed an MSCP Subarea Plan that addresses the needs of multiple species and provides for the preservation of natural vegetation communities through long-term habitat based conservation. The Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan includes preserve design which conserves 75% of the major San Diego Barrel Cactus populations within the Salt Creek, Wolf Canyon, and the Otay River Valley. Area-specific management directives for San Diego Barrel Cactus include protection of this species from edge effects and unauthorized collection. Directives also include a requirement for appropriate fire management/control practices to protect against a too frequent fire cycle (MNA Consulting 2000). The San Miguel Ranch project has committed to a salvage effort that would collect cacti from development areas and relocate these to the on-site open space. Merkel & Associates, Inc. 96-070-14 2 /.~ IJ . ;' '" DEC-12-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12/00. TUE 17:34 FAX 619 560 5465 P.06 R-731 Job-275 141 006 San Die 0 Barrel Cactus December 2000 After finalization of a Donation of Land Agreement between NNP Trimark San Miguel Ranch. LLC (Trimark) and the federal government, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Refuge System will acquire the SMR-OSP area and will have immediate access to manage and monitor the SMR.OSP area. Therefore, following cactus translocation. and short-term monitoring and management completion, the long-term continued conservation of the on-site barrel cactus population will be the responsibility of the appropriate federal refuge manager(s). 3 Merkel & Associates. Inc. 96-070-14 /1; H . ;' .'? DEC-12-00 11: 36 619 560 5465 TUE 17'34 FAX 619 560 5465 12/12/00 . P.07 R-731 Job-275 ~007 e'." . -, ',:'.-';" .. . ...,.-.&..-.-.. ;":"- !iOO 0 500 1000 Feet P""""'! San Miguel Ranch Project Vic~nity Map . uSGS 7.5' Jamul Mountains and Soun;::~lIonal City, CA. Quadrangles Figure 1 i"'l"i t'" Ut~-IL-UU I (:.1b bl~ ::JbU ::J4b::J 12/12/00 TOE 17:36 FAX 619 560 5465 P.08 R-731 Job-Z75 141008 San DieRo Barrel Cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) Translocation Plan for San Mi;ruel Ranch December 2000 TRANSLOCATION SITE SELECTION METHODS The translocation area was selected based on criteria established by M&A. Additional input was provided by the California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Chula Vista's biological monitor, Recon. A review of existing information and supplementary fieldwork were conducted in an effort to select an appropriate translocation area. A field examination of existing conditions at both naturally occurring cacti stands and potential receptor/translocation sites was completed. Data collected at these sites included information on vegetation communities present, plant associations found at naturally occurring cacti sites, plant associations observed at non-occupied habitats within OS-3, the status of weedy species within each site, topography, slope, aspect, and general site conditions. In addition, soils, geology, and MSCP Planning Area maps of the natural and translocation sites were reviewed and compared. A field review of previous transplant efforts within the proposed translocation site was also conducted to gain site-specific knowledge of the likely performance of transplants based on performance evaluations of the prior transplants completed by Rolling Hills Ranch. From this review, insight into the microhabitat components which would favor cacti survival within the proposed translocl\tion effort was obtained. RESULTS Translocation Site Physical Characteristics Soils OS-3, including the entire translocation area is mapped as San Miguel Exchequer (Figure 2). Although unmapped, a number of clay intrusions are known to exist in this open space as evidenced by small native grasslands on shallow friable soils. There appears to be no documented or discernable differences between the soils present in the translocation area and those within most donor areas. Furthermore, the soils within the translocation area currently support both natural and transplanted cacti, including all ofthe extremely large specimens within San Miguel Ranch South. Geolol!Y Underlying geology within OS-3 is mapped as Upper Pliocene marine (Strand 1962). Several outcroppings exist along the central north-south trending ridgeline on the site with especially prominent features being located at the southern most terminus of this ridge. The shallow soils intermixed with exposed geology along the central ridgeline are the most densely occupied habitats by cacti. TOOOl!fllDhic SloDes and Asoects The single most distinguishing feature of this area is the large ridgeline that occupies much of OS-3 (Figure 3). The western and eastern slopes of this ridge vary on a microhabitat scale in terms of gradient but are generally intermediate in pitch. Investigation of natural cactus populations in OS-3 indicated that they persist on slopes of approximately 10 to 500. The areas proposed for translocation cover much of the ridge line and include flat locations as well as slopes of up to 45-500. Within the 08-3 area cacti currently occur on either side of the large ridge to the east and west. However, the barrel cactus of OS-3 naturally occur in higher densities on the eastern facing side where they extend further down slope. This eastern slope of the OS-3 ridgeline contains more small rock outcrops and scattered small boulders. Merkel & Associates, Inc. 9(j'()70-14 5 /"fJ , , ...., DEC-1Z-00 17:36 61S 560 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:37 FAX 619 560 5465 P.OS R-731 Job-Z75 1iZI009 San Die 0 Barrel Cactus Ferocactus v;ridescens Translocation Plan or San Mi ue/ Ranch December 2000 Translocation Site Biological Characteristics Vel!etation Community All of the OS-3 area proposed for cactus translocation is mapped as Coastal Sage Scrub, excluding the dirt roads which occur along the crest and at the northern end of the ridgeline. The dominant species are California Sagebrush, Flat-top Buckwheat, and San Diego County Viguiera (Viguiera laciniata). Additional species present throughout the translocation area include Coastal Jepsonia (Jepsonia parry/), Blue DicksIWild Hyacinth (Dicheloslemma capitatum), Ashy Spike-moss (Selaginella cinerascens), Prickly Pear (Opunlia sp.), Wavy-leaf Soap Plant (ChlQrogalum pomeridianum), and native grasses. The western slope of the ridge provides suitable cacti habitat near the ridge line but gradually converts to denser sage scrub with a greater non-native grassland component as the slope descends. The eastern slope of the OS-3 ridge appears to provide more areas of open ground that appear to be suited for translocation of cacti. Plant Associations Similar to the donor sites, the barrel cactus which occur naturally in the OS-3 area are typically associated with Ashy Spike-moss, native grasses, and in many cases the exotic Erodium spp. More importantly, examinations of previous transplants within the area indicate the importance of cacti association with small rock outcrops or small boulders. Opportunities exist within the translocation area to utilize these existing biological and physical conditions to increase the density of barrel cactus within open space. Weed Status The proposed translocation site shows variation in terms of weed invasion. Non-native grasses are present throughout OS-3 in varying amounts but are much less dense in the receptor areas. Down slope, to the west of the designated translocation site, the non-native grasses become more predominant. Erodium is present through much of the translocation site and appears to coexist in immediate proximity to San Diego Barrel Cactus under current conditions within previous transplant sites and natural populations. Translocation Site Buffering The translocation area is sited in the center of OS-3, the largest of the open space preserve areas within San Miguel Ranch. To the north of OS-3, lie SDG&E transmission corridor lands and to the east is the Otay Water District Preserve Area. In fact, much of OS-3 will not border residential development. The central location of the barrel cactus translocation site within OS-3 will provide a significant buffer between residential neighborhoods and the receiver sites. The site's location and the proposed fencing of all areas adjacent to preserve lands will provide protection against illegal collection of cacti or impacts from substantial human use degradation. Although a trail is proposed within the vicinity of the translocation area, measures to prevent off-trail impacts by pets and humans should provide adequate protection for the transplanted cacti. Currently, a dirt road bisects much of OS-3, following the ridge line until it intersects with an SDG&E access road to the north. This dirt trail will provide access to the translocation area for transplanting and initial watering, but will be reseeded with native sage scrub following completion of the translocation efforts. Morul & A3sociates, Inc. 96-070-14 6 /.~ /-}~ J "'- Q' .:). i~~ -... Scale: 1" 2000' M&A!t 960-07l Site Legend: o Preserve and Open Space Areas Iii2J Barrel Cactus Translocation Area N Site Boundary Soli Legend: DaC, DaD, DaE, and DaE2 . Diablo Clay Soils LsE and LSF . Linne Clay Soils OhC and OhE - Olivenhain Soils SnG - San Miguel Exchequer Soils . . Addnional unmapped clay intrusions over SnG are expected San Miguel South Soils Map Source: USDA Soil Conservation Service Jamul Mountains Quadrangle (Sheet No. 64) Figure 2 Merkel & Associates. Inc. .... '" "- .... '" ~ "- '" n '" .!.. N I >-3 0 [ii 0 .... ~ ... ~ .. = '" ... ." i:< '" .... '" en ~ '" '" '" en = en 0 .. en '" ,.. = en en :0 o '" I ~ ~ ~ o ~ I N ~ en LEiI '" .... '" DEC-12-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:40 FAX 619 560 5465 P .11 R-731 Job-U5 ~011 \ \ Logond' F ExIst1na Feroc;:eduS vlrldelcens r:zI T.....1oc8tIon MIll of Ferocadus vIrideseens .......- . ",-"Cooal8l_ SeN' ...........w__ _ NonoNaIlv. GnI1lStand /\/""",Spooos N"'_T"" /'V_ /'VT__ -+ 40lI 0 40lI HI e San Diego Barrel Cactus Translocation Area Figure and Donor Sites Within Open Space 3 3 F . /oJ ./ i:I.~~. ).J.~ OEC-12-00 17:36 619 560 5465 ----.!_~1l2/00_ TUE 17: 42 FAX 619 560 5465 P .12 R-731 J ob-2l5 141 012 San Die 0 Barrel Cactus Ferocaclus viridescens Trans/ocation Plan or San Mi el Ranch December 2000 Comparison with Donor Sites Barrel cacti are to be salvaged from three distinct locations within San Miguel Ranch. The first is immediately adjacent to OS-3, southwest of the translocation site. The other two populations slated for translocation occur on small ridges south of H Street and west of the central access gate. All but the population near the access gate occur on San Miguel Exchequer soils. The population near the access gate occurs on an area mapped as OIivenhain (OhE) soil. The geology throughout San Miguel Ranch South, including both the donor and translocation sites is mapped as Upper Pliocene marine (Strand 1962). San Miguel Ranch natural populations are present on north, south, east, and west slopes, and generally all combinations therein. The populations proposed for translocation arc located on a south facing slope (the population south of H Street), south and west facing slopes near OS-3, and south, southeastern, and southwestern facing slopes near the access gate. The gradients of the slopes supporting the donor populations vary from approximately 0-150 at the site near the access gate to 30-500 near H Street. The sites that support barrel cactus populations subject to transplantation are occupied by Coastal Sage Scrub. Comparable to the translocation site, the dominant species are California Sagebrush (Artemisia californica) and Flat-top Buckwheat (Eriogonumfascicula/um var.fasciculatum). Flat- top Buckwheat was particularly prevalent in the Coastal Sage Scrub near the access gate. Although not dominant, a host of other sage scrub species are found within the areas which support barrel cactus, among these were California Adolphia (Adolphia californica), Chalk Live-Forever/Chalk- lettuce (Dudleya pulverulenta), Fish-hook Cactus (Mammillaria dioica), Coast Cholla (Opuntia prolifera), and Wavy-leaf Soap Plant. The cholla and Fish-hook Cactus will also be opportunistically salvaged for transplant into OS-3. A more specific examination of the areas immediately surrounding barrel cacti indicated the relatively consistent presence of a few plant species, Ashy Spike-moss, Erodium spp., and native grasses. These results are comparable to observations of barrel cacti populations within the translocation area. The natural populations' sites generally demonstrated some level of invasion by non-native species. The most common weedy species was Erodium spp., followed by non-native grasses such as Slender Wild Oat (Avena barbata). However, these species were rarely dominant. In the case of the non- native grasses, a few cacti were found growing within patches of habitat almost completely occupied by annual grasses, but in most cases the cacti occupied the open portions of the Coastal Sage Scrub that supported less non-native grass than adjacent areas. The level of Erodium infestation within the translocation site appeared greater than that within the donor sites. TRANSLOCATION METHODS A number of San Diego Barrel Cacti have already been transplanted from the development area to the SMR-OSP. These cacti were removed from the project development area in an effort to avoid impacts to this species during soils and archeological testing. Other cacti were relocated from the East H Street extension during grading by Rolling Hills Ranch. Where barrel cactus exist within the development footprint, barrel cactus will be salvaged from the development area to the SMR-OSP. Translocation will occur prior to grading, based on review of the final grading plan. Translocation is expected to occur for development east of SR-125 in fall 2000. Development west ofSR-125 is not Merkel & Associates. Inc. 96-070-14 9 /{,/I .;; .) -" OEC-12-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12~TUE 17:42 FAX 619 560 5465 P .13 R-731 Job-275 14I 013 San Die~o Barrel Cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) Translocation Plan for San MiRUel Ranch December 2000 expected to impact any barrel cactus; therefore, transplants are not expected as a result of this development. Translocation of cactus will be conducted by the revegetation crews of Merkel & Associates acting under the supervision of a revegetation specialist. Both the crews and revegetation specialist have experience in barrel cacti transplantation on multiple sites, including the San Miguel Ranch property. The Following General Measures shall be implemented for the San Diego Barrel Cactus Salvagingffranslocation Program: I) The M&A project biologist and revegetation specialist will coordinate with the City of Chula Vista's Mitigation Monitoring Consultant (Recon), on the salvaging of cacti from the San Miguel Ranch South development area and relocation to the designated SMR-OSP (specifically, OS-3). 2) Biological monitoring shall be provided by M&A during the translocation phase and subsequent establishment period of 120-days to assess the initial success of the translocation program and identify and implement adaptive management measures to increase establishment success. 3) The project biologist shall conduct a site analysis and field evaluation to map existing conditions of the receptor sites. Detailed locations for the cacti transplantation locations within the receptor sites will also be identified in the field, based upon existing site conditions, and mapped at an appropriate scale for directing the planting effort and documenting the final conditions. 4) The project biologist shall coordinate vehicular access to the receptor sites. This will include coordination with SDG&E to arrange for vehicular access to the receptor sites. 5) Cactus salvage and transplantation is anticipated to occur in the fall and winter of 2000-01; therefore, impacts to nesting California Gnatcatchers would not result from the salvage or planting efforts. 6) All vehicles used in the salvage effort shall use existing dirt roads, except for balloon tired vehicles used to transport cacti to planting areas. The Following Specific Methodology will be utilized for the Cactus Salvaging and Translocation: I) Cacti shall be flagged and marked by the revegetation specialist and crews to identify orientation/solar exposure of each cactus. This shall be accomplished through the use of a compass bearing and cacti-spine painting. This is intended to identify proper solar orientation for replanting. The largest of the cacti shall be salvaged first, with smaller cacti second. Cacti as small as one-inch diameter will be salvaged. 2) Cacti shall be dug up and salvaged bare-root so that the roots can be callused-off prior to replanting. As much of the root structure shall be retained as possible, however, retention of a soil rootball is not necessary. The cacti shall be loaded into cardboard boxes, wood palettes, or crates, on a single level for transport to the receptor sites via trucks and trailers. The "pop- harden" method shall be utilized which will entail callusing of the roots through air exposure for a minimum of three days to seven days, followed by direct planting. The project biologist will assess the actual condition of the cacti, to determine if they are ready for translocation as Merkel & Associates, Inc. 96-070-14 10 , / :; (l! . ' ~- OEC-12-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12/00 TUB 17:43 FAX 619 560 5465 P .14 R-731 Job-275 141014 San Die 0 Barrel Cactus Ferocactus virjdescens Translocation Plan or San Mi ue/ Ranch December 2000 recommended by Recon. Cacti shall be stored within the limits of the receptor site, under shade cloth until the time of planting. The stored cacti shall be lightly misted with water once every two weeks during the storage period. Based on the determination of the project biologist, stored plants will be protected from persistent rain by covering the storage structure with plastic as recommended by Recon. 3) Cacti shall be planted in clusters for the smaller cacti, and individually for the larger cacti. Each numbered cluster location shall consist of a minimum of two cacti and a maximum of seven. 4) Actual planting shall incorporate small indigenous boulders and cobbles, which if not available in sufficient numbers at the translocation site, shall be gathered from adjacent disturbed areas near the planting locations, around the planted cacti. These shall be placed adjacent to the cacti clusters to assist with retaining soil and soil moisture. This will help mimic natural growing conditions noted in the existing populations. Planting efforts will make use of small boulders and small rock outcrops existing naturally within the translocation area. These areas will be targeted for planting above other areas, based on the results of previous transplants within the translocation area. 5) All cacti planting areas shall be watered down to soften the soil prior to planting. All cacti shall also be watered-in by hand at the time of planting via water jugs or buckets to settle soil around the rootballs and disperse air pockets. The watering is not intended to initiate root growth but is only intended to settle the soil and to assist with the planting effort. Watering of the cacti will not continue after the initial planting effort. It is expected that the cacti will remain dormant until natural seasonal rainfall stimulates new growth. 6) All cacti planting locations (clusters and lor individuals) shall be marked (staked with rebar posts) and labeled with an identifying number, for mapping and future monitoring. 7) All numbered cacti clusters shall be mapped by the project biologist on appropriate topographic maps to document the final planting locations and to facilitate monitoring identification. A partitioned (by slope, aspect, amount of rock , etc.) randomized sampling of 10% of the cacti (approximately 600 representing approximately 20 to 30 sites) will be staked and surveyed in using dOPS. Cacti will be mapped and photographed within 4 square meter long-term monitoring plots for future comparison to a survey to be conducted three years in the future. 8) The M&A revegetation crews shall also implement the required seeding of all abandoned roads leading to the receptor sites. All seeded areas shall be non-irrigated, intended to germinate only on natural rainfall. Seed shall be broadcast and lightly raked by hand into the soil surface. (See Reseeding of Abandoned Access Roads section for details regarding the seed mix composition.) 9) All trash and debris generated by the planting effort shall be removed completely from the site at completion of the work. M&A shall maintain the planting areas for a 120-day period, during which the following procedures shall be implemented: . Weed growth shall be controlled within five meters of transplanted cacti. Weed species are defined as those species included in Appendix A of this document. Merkel & Associates, /nc. 96-070-14 11 "tfJ ~:; DEC-1Z-DO 17:36 6195605465 --11j12/00 TOE 17:44 FAX 619 560 5465 P .15 R-731 Job-175 141015 San DieKo Barrel Cactus (Ferococtus viridescens) Translocation Plan for San Mil(Uel Ranch December 2000 . All sloughed soil of air pockets and voids around cacti shall be repaired and back-filled to eliminate basins where water can pool around cacti. . All flagging and staking shall remain in place and be repaired as necessary. RESEEDING OF ABANDONED ACCESS ROADS As previously specified, seeding ofthe abandoned roads leading to the receptor site shall be required following cactus translocation. The portion of the dirt roadway within OS-3 that is currently proposed for future use as a regional trail will not be included in the reseeding efforts. This revegetation effort is expected to decrease weed invasion that might otherwise occur due to the presence of open, disturbed habitat. It is anticipated that reseeding will reduce impacts from human intrusion associated with regional trail use. The roads will be seeded with a Coastal Sage Scrub mixture composed of native species (Table I). Following seed broadcast, these areas will be monitored and weeded in conjunction with cactus monitoring and invasive species control. Ta lIS d M' be . ee IX to e se or 'el!an oasta al!e crub estoration Species Recommended Minimum Approximate Density 0/0 Puritvl %Germlnation Artemisia cali/ornica IS/SO 3 IbsJacre California Sa!!ebrush Eriogonum!asciculatum 10/65 10 Ibs.lacre Fiat-top Buckwheat lsomer;s arborea 90/65 2 IbsJacre Bladdemod Lotus scoparius 90/60 3 Ibs.lacre Deerweed Nossella lepida 60/60 2 Ibs.lacre Foothill Stipa Salvia oplana 70/50 2 Ibs.lacre White Sa!!e Salvia munzji 40130 2 Ibs.lacre Munz's Sa!!e Viguiera Iacinialo 40/50 4 Ibs.lacre San Die!!o CounlY Vil!Uiera BUd ~ D' C IS S R All plant materials are to be native to the site or native to similar undisturbed habitats in the southern coastal region of San Diego County. Seed from the species listed above may be salvaged from the site if the opportunity occurs; otherwise, material will be purchased from a California native plant seed wholesale company, such as S&S Seeds (Carpinteria, California). Any seed purchased and used on-site must have been originally collected from locations within 50 miles of the project site. This will ensure habitat continuity and prevent against invasion of non-local ecotypes or cultivars. No plant/seed substitution will occur unless first approved by the project biologist and the City's Monitoring Consultant. Maintenance activities will be carried out over a 120-day period. These activities will include weed and exotic plant control, re-seeding to guarantee successful restoration efforts, and any other incidental maintenance as necessary to ensure that proper regrowth of the target vegetation occurs. Weed abatement on-site will be performed to control particularly noxious or competitive species which would inhibit the growth of desirable native vegetation. Weeding will be performed in conjunction with barrel cactus translocation site weeding. Exotic plants to be removed from the site Merkel & Associales. Inc. 96-070-14 12 .J I" ,.) " DEC-l1-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:44 FAX 619 560 5465 P .16 R-731 Job-175 141016 San Die 0 Barrel Cactus Ferocactus viridescens Translocation Plan or San Mi uel Ranch December 2000 will include, but will not be limited to, Short-pod Mustard (Hirschfe/dia incana), Filaree (Erodium sp.), Sweet Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), Russian Thistle (Sa/sola tragus), Red Brome (Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens), Tocalote (Centaurea melitensis). Because the road to be closed occurs principally within areas of shallow soils that are targeted for cacti habitat restoration, the primary objectives for the roadway closure and restoration are to ensure the elimination of vehicular access and the development of a stable native sage scrub community that will be resistant to invasion by non-native weedy species. Dense vegetation cover is to be discouraged. It is anticipated that the shallow soils and near surface geology of these areas will effectively keep scrub vegetation sparse and open, as is most suited to cacti habitat. Once the planting has been completed, a 120-day maintenance and monitoring program for the restored habitat wi\l commence, coordinated to coincide with the barrel cactus monitoring. The monitoring program will be conducted by the project biologist. Monitoring and maintenance wi\l occur at months 0 and 3. Because no specific coverage criteria for vegetation is targeted, the use of quantitative monitoring of roadway revegetation areas is not warranted. Instead, the seeded roadway areas will be reviewed for evidence of germination at month 3 using a simple walk-through observation methodology. Remedial measures, such as reseeding, will be conducted if necessary during month 3. Weeding activities will be conducted in conjunction with the translocated barrel cactus population weeding. Brief summary reports wi\l be prepared by the biologist after .each monitoring interval. These reports may be combined within the San Diego Barrel Cactus monitoring reports. BARREL CACTUS MONITORING, MANAGEMENT, AND REPORTING ESTABLISHMENT MONITORING METHODS As previously outlined, transplanted cacti clusters will be marked and numbered. The entire transplanted population will be reviewed for survival during the 120-day post translocation period. The focus of the monitoring will be to identify establishment-precluding conditions which may be repaired or modified. The survivorship of each enumerated cactus or cactus cluster will be recorded and recommendations for remedial measures will be noted as necessary by the project biologist. Remedial measures which address drainage problems at the base of cacti, soil compaction issues, solar orientation, and weed species presence will be undertaken during the 120-day monitoring period to ensure the highest level of establishment success for the translocated population. In addition to adaptive management actions, weeding of the translocation site will occur during the 120- day period. Initial removal of the invasive species listed in Appendix A is expected to benefit the translocated cactus population on both a short-term and long-term basis. The results of this initial monitoring will be supplied to the refuge manager, both in report and raw data format to assist with the future management of this population. SCHEDULE FOR 120-DA Y MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING OF THE TRANSPLANTED CACTI POPULATION The biological monitor will conduct monthly monitoring during the 120-day post-translocation period. Monitoring will be undertaken using the aforementioned methods. This early monitoring and management period is especial1y crucial to the success of the translocation effort.' Merkel & Assaciates. Inc. 96-070-14 13 _1/.'~ ..,. , VtC-j ,-uu 11 : ~ti til ~ ~6U 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:45 FAX 619 560 5465 P .17 R-731 Job-l75 ~017 San DieRo Barrel Cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) Translocation Plan for San Mifl:Uel Ranch December 2000 CONTINGENCY MEASURES The intent of the program was to salvage cacti from development areas and supplement the naturally occurring cacti populations within the project open space. This effort was incorporated in recognition that San Diego Barrel Cacti are relatively long-lived species that are readily transplanted and are considered a sensitive species. The sage scrub habitat occupied by barrel cacti is already being addressed by the conservation of habitat, including barrel cactus within OS-3 and the northern San Miguel Ranch parcel. For this reason, the translocation is purely a salvage effort designed to minimize the loss of what is considered to be a valuable habitat element. This translocation plan represents a best effort plan to meet Trimark's commitment to. relocate all barrel cactus from areas proposed for impact to open space. The plan includes Trimark supported monitoring and management of the translocated population through the l20-day establishment period in recognition of this period's crucial influence on the ultimate success of the translocation program. THREE-YEAR REVIEW METHODS As an additional examination to determine how well transplanted cacti have survived over time, a review of the previously mapped and photographed four square meter long-term monitoring plots is to be conducted three years after the initial transplant efforts. Cacti are to be remapped within the 4 meter plots and photographs are to be taken from the same range and perspective as during the initial survey. An assessment of change shall be prepared that evaluates growth, reproduction, mortality, and vegetation development (native and non-native) within the plots. Information shall be presented along with qualitative and quantitative analyses regarding transplant performance. Data are to be summarized in a report provided to the City, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and California Department ofFish and Game to assist in the continued development of restoration science and to aid in designing future transplant programs. Merkel & Associates. Inc. 96-070c14 14 j,,,; A ..;,..1) "I, ". .] DEC-1Z-00 17:36 6195605465 12/12/00 TUE 17:45 FAX 619 560 5465 P .18 R-731 Jab-175 ~018 San Dief?o Barrel Cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) Translocation Plan for San Mif?Uel Ranch December 2000 LITERATURE CITED Bowman, Roy H. 1973. Soil Survey, San Diego Area, California. U.S. Department of Agriculture. December, 1973. California Exotic Pest Plant Council (CaIEPPC). 1999. The CalEPPC List: Exotic Pest Plants of Greatest Ecological Concern in California. Cal EPPC, San Juan Capistrano, California. II pp. MNA Consulting. 2000. Draft City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan Revisions. October 9, 2000. MNA Consulting. 2000. Draft City ofChula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan. September II, 2000. Recon. 2000. Technical Review of the San Miguel Ranch Open Space Preserve Area-Specific Management Plan. November 3, 2000. 7 pp. Reiser, Craig H. Rare Plants of San Diego County. 1997. 1997 Edition. Aquafir Press. I 96pp. Skinner, M., Pavlik, B. Ed. 1994. California Native Plant Society's Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. CNPS Special Publication No. I 5th Edition. February. 338 pp. Strand, Rudolph G. 1962. Geologic Map of California, San Diego-El Centro Sheet (fourth printing 1993). State of California, The Resources Agency Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology. Merkel & Associates. Inc. 96-070-14 15 /0/1 ..J ..1 ,I OEC-12-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:45 FAX 619 560 5465 P .19 R-731 San Diel(o Barrel Cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) Translocation Plan for San MiKUel Ranch Mer,",1 & Associates, Inc. 96-070-/4 APPENDIX A ",,/-J ." /:;:',,) Job-275 December 2000 14J019 1 DEC-12-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:46 FAX 619 560 5465 no R-731 Job-215 ~020 San DieRo Barrel Cactus (Ferocactw v;ridescens) Translocation Plan for San Mi~eJ Ranch December 2000 List of weedy, invasive species to be controlled within the San Diego Barrel Cactus Translocation Area. Scientific Name Common Name(s} A rreratina adenonhora Euoatorv Ailanthus altissima Tree Of Heaven Arundo donax Giant Reed, Arundo Atrinlex semibaccata Australian Saltbush Avena barbata Slender Wild Oat Brassica niura Black Mustard Bromus madritensis sso. rubens Red Brome Caroobrotus edulis Icenlant, Hottentot-fi" CarDObrotus chilensis SeaFi!! Centaurea melitensis Tecalote Chamomilla suaveolens Pineapple Weed Cirsium vulf!Ore Bull Thistle Convza canadensis Horseweed CortaderiaFUbata Andean Pamnas Grass, Jubata !!rass Cortaderia selloana Pamnas Grass Cynara cardunculus Artichoke Thistle &iisus sconarius Scotch Broom Cvtisus striatus Striated Broom Erodium s.;:;:- Filaree Eucalvotus sn. Eucalvptus Foeniculum vulf!Ore Wild Fennel Hirschfeldia incana Short-nod Mustard I.-e;'idium latifolium Perennial Penoerweed. Tall Whiteton Marrubium vulvare Horehound MVooorum laetum Nl!:aio Nicotiana "lauca Tree Tobacco Olea eurODia Mission Olive Pennisetum setaceum Fountain Grass Ranhanus sativus Radish Retama monosoorma Bridal Broom Ricinus communis Castor-bean Salsola travus Russian Thistle Schinus molle Peruvian Penper Tree Sonchus snn. Sow Thistle Taeniatherum caout-medusae Medusa-Head Tamarix chinensis, T. gallica, T. parviflora, Tamarisk, Salt Cedar & T. ramosissima Merkel & Associates, Inc. 96-070-14 2 o,.:l '~, '..,il"," . UCc-ll-UU 1(:.~ 619560 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:46 FAX 619 560 5465 P.1l R-731 San Die 0 Barrel Cactus erocactus viridescens Translocation Plan or Son Mi el Ranch Merkel & Associates, Inc. 96-070-14 APPENDIX B / r~ t<? ,. ii- ./ ~..t., Job-1I5 December 2000 IgJ021 3 DEC-IZ-OO 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:46 FAX 619 560 5465 P.22 Mr. Stephen Hester NNP - Trimark San Miguel LLC Implementation and Monitoring of the San Miguel Ranch San Diego Barrel CactusTranslocaiton Plan Task Staff Rate Hours Subtotal ($/bour) or Miles R-731 Job-275 ~022 ll-Dec-OO 96-070-16 Total TASK 1. CACTUS COLLECTION, SITE PREPARATION, AND TRANSLOCATION 1.1. Site Analysis and Field Evaluation Senior Biologist Associate Biologist $72.00 $58.00 1.2. Construction of a Temporary, On-site Holding Area for Pop Hardening Biological Monitor/Senior Biologist $72.00 2 Field Labor Support $20.00 16 Materials 1.3. Barrel Cactus Removal from Development Area per 1000 Cacti Biological Monitor/Senior Biologist $72.00 Revegetation Specialist $45.00 Revegetation Technician $25.00 Revegetation Technician $25.00 1.4. Monitoring/Evaluation of Cacti in Holding Area Biological Monitor/Senior Biologist $72.00 1.5. Barrel Cactus Relocation and Replanting into Preserve Areas per 1000 Cacti Mapping/Marking Biological Monitor/Senior Biologist $72.00 32 Revegetation Specialist $45.00 32 Revegetation Technician $25.00 32 Revegetation Technician $25.00 32 $45.00 $25.00 $25.00 /6 ;t:J / ..,J ..) -"'-- 16 8 $1,152.00 $464.00 I $1,616.00 I $144.00 $320.00 $1,000.00 I $1,464.00 I 12 12 12 12 $864.00 $540.00 $300.00 $300.00 I $2,004.00 I 8 $576.00 I $576.00 I $2,304.00 $1,440.00 $800.00 $800.00 I 8 8 8 $360.00 $200.00 $200.00 . 1.6. Selective Translocation of Other Non-listed Plant Species (Fish-hook Cactus and ChoDa sp.) and Collection of Boulders and Cobbles for Translocation Use Revegetation Specialist Revegetation Technician Revegetation Technician $5,344.00 I DEe-12-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:46 FAX 619 560 5465 1.7. Reseeding of Abandoned Access Roads Revegetation Specialist Revegetation Technician Materials-Seed Mix 1.8. Project Administration Project Coordination Senior Biologist Project Coordinator 1.9. Other Direct Costs Mileage ($OAO/mile) Materials (flagging. paint...) Task 1 Subtotal P.23 $45.00 $25.00 $72.00 $60.00 $0.40 R-731 Job-275 8 8 $360.00 $200.00 $220.00 I 8 8 $576.00 $480.00 I 720 $288.00 $50.00 I I Transplantation of Additional barrel Cacti and Other Non-listed Plant Species* Costs per additional 1 00 Cacti TASK 2. 120 Day Monitoring, Maintenance and Reporting 2.1. Weed removal Cactus Translocation Area Revegetation Specialist Revegetation Technician Revegetation Specialist Revegetation Technician Reseeded Roadway 2.2 Physical Maintenance/Adaptive Management Repair and Back-fill Around C Revegetation Specialist Repair Flagging and Staking Revegetation Technician 2.3. Barrel cactus Monitoring Long-term Monitoring Plot &1 Biological Monitor/Senior Biologist Monthly Monitoring Biological Monitor/Senior Biologist Monthly Monitoring Biological Technician $45.00 $25.00 $45.00 $25.00 $45.00 $25.00 $72.00 $72.00 $45.00 2.4. Reseeded Coastal Sage Scrub Month 0 and 3 Monitoring Biological Monitor/Senior Biologist $72.00 I!.I;~~"" / '" ~023 $760.00 I $780.00 I $1.056.00 I $338.00 I $13,938.00 I $800.00 I 24 $1.080.00 72 $1,800.00 8 $360.00 16 $400.00 I $3,640.00 I 16 $720.00 32 $800.00 I $1,520.00 I 24 $1,728.00 27 $1,944.00 27 $1,215.00 I 8 $576.00 I $4,887.00 I $576.00 I DEC-12-00 17:36 619 560 5465 12/12/00 TUE 17:47 FAX 619 560 5465 P.24 Job-275 R-731 2.5. Reporting (for Barrel Cactus and Reseeded Coastal Sage Scrub Conbined) Monthly Repons Biological Monitor/Senior Biologist $72.00 24 $1,728.00 Task 2 Subtotal Tasks 1 + 2 Total Anticipated Transplantation of Additional 5000 Barrel Cacti Approximate Total for Transplantation (6000 cacti), Short.term Maintenance, Monitoring and Reporting TASK 3. Three-year Survey Reporting 3.1. Field Survey Biological Monitor/Senior Biologist Associate Biologist 3.2 Data Analysis and Report Biological Monitor/Senior Biologist Associate Biologist Task 3 Subtotal Short-term Maintenance, Monitoring and Reporting 141024 $72.00 $58.00 16 $1,152.00 18 $1.044.00 I $72.00 $58.00 24 $1.728.00 24 $1,392.00 I I GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED FOR BARREL CACTUS RELOCATION I _,'J ,/ """ .,it-;~ -.."..-!_" $1,728.00 I $12,351.001 $26,289.00 I $40,000.001 I $66,289.00 I $2,196.00 I $3.120.00 I $5,316,00 I , $71,605.00 I 12/12/00 TUE 14: 09 FAX 619 5.60 5465 SAN MIGUEL RANCH SOUTH OPEN SPACE PRESERVE FENCING PLAN Prepared/or: NNP - Trlmark San Miguel Ranth, LLC 85 Argonaut, Suite 205 AUso Viejo, California 92656 Anention: Stephen Hesler Prepared by: Merkel & Assotiates, Int. 5434 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA 92123 Conlact: Melissa A. Booker Phone: (858) 560-5465 Fax: (858) 560-7779 Detember 11,2000 ~<L.,~./I /~ 17. /:3b ...... HEWIIT MAGUIRE ~002 . EXHIBIT l1L _ 12/12/00 TUE 14: 10 FAX .619 _560 5465 ~~~ HEWITT MAGUIRE ~003 San Miguel Ranch South Open Space Preserve Fencing Plan December 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..u"...u.............,...........~..................h..........................................................-................................... 1 BAClWROUNO ........................................................................................................................................................... I LoCATION .................................................................................................................................................................2 GENERAL PHYSIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................................... 3 PURPOSE....................................................................................................................................................................5 FENCING METHODS............................................................................................................................................... 5 BORDER PATROL ACCESS AND TRAILS...................................................................................................................... 5 SIGNAGE....................................................._...............................................................................................................6 PERIMETER FENCE POSTING ..............................,....................................................................................................... 6 TRAIL FENCE POSTING .............................................................................................................................................. 6 LITERATURE CITED ........................_........._..............................................................................~u......_...~.....~..... 8 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure I. Project Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................. 4 Figure 2. Fencing Locations with San Miguel Ranch. ......................................................................... 7 APPENDICES Appendix A - Fencing Cost Estimates Merkel & Associates, Inc. # 96-070-14 /6 '" - I:J ? - 12/12/00 TUB 14:10 FAX 619 560 5465 ~~~ HEWITT MAGUIRE ~004 San Miguel Ranch South Open Space Preserve Fencing Plan December 2000 SAN MIGUEL RANCH SOUTH OPEN SPACE PRESERVE FENCING PLAN SUMMARY The San Miguel Ranch South Open Space Preserve Fencing Plan applies to in the San Miguel Ranch Open Space Preserve (SMR-OSP), including the Otay Tarplant (Deinandra [Hemizonia] conjugens) preserve areas. The City of Chula Vista (the City), County of San Diego, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the California Department ofFish & Game (CDFG), and NNP - Trimark San Miguel Ranch, LLC (Trimark) are entering into an Annexation Agreement Concerning the Conservation and Biological Mitigation Program for the Implementation of the San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area Plan and Tentative Tract Map. Pursuant to the Biological Annexation Agreement agreement, the federal government will acquire the SMR-OSP and the subsequent maintenance, management and monitoring obligations. The SMR-OSP will then be under management by the National Wildlife Refuge System (Refuges). Pursuant to the Biological Annexation Agreement agreement, 'Trimark has agreed to construct a perimeter fence and trail fencing for the SMR-OSP. This plan outlines the location, general configuration, and purpose of the fencing. It also addresses the boundary signage. The fencing plan describes two types of fencing, implemented in different areas of the SMR-OSP, based on the purpose of the barrier and the surrounding conditions. More specific details of the trail and perimeter fencing, gating, and signage will be illustrated on the Master Fencing and Wall Plan. After initial installation of the fencing, Refuges will be responsible for maintenance, repair and, as necessary, replacement of the fencing. The SMR-OSP lies adjacent to areas proposed for residential development, portions of the State Route 125 (SR-125) corridor, and preserved open space. It currently supports a variety of sensitive species including the federally listed California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica), and Otay Tarplant and Variegated Dudleya (Dudleya variegata) a Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) narrow endemic species. These sensitive species, along with a host of more common flora and fauna, will benefit from the protection provided by the preserve perimeter fence. The fence is designed to aid in the long-term viability and sustainability of ecosystem function within the SMR-OSP. To that end, it provides protection of existing and restored resources, within the SMR-OSP and tarplant preserve areas. INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND The San Miguel Ranch development program contains approximately 169 acres of managed natural open space within the south parcel (or development parcel) which is to be contributed to the MSCP Preserve System. It is comprised of Open Space Areas (OS) 1, 3, 6, and 7 as designated in the approved tentative map. In addition, San Miguel Ranch is including approximately II additional acres of approved residential development area into this fmal preserve area. This additional acreage is being added because of its perceived value for enhancing the long-term conservation of Otay Tarplant. The SMR-OSP provides biological conservation benefits in addition to tqosc of the conservation of the entire 1,852-acre San Miguel Ranch northern parcel. Approximately 1,686 acres of the northern parcel is currently within the San Diego Wildlife Refuge. The remaining 166 acres of Merkel & Associates, Inc. # 96-070-14 /'i>,q /:J 8 t 12/12/00 TIlE 14: 11 FAX 619 560 5465 ~~~ HEWITT MAGUIRE ~005 San Miguel Ranch South Open Space Preserve Fencing Plan December 2000 the northern parcel will be conserved as part of project entitlement, and set aside solely as additional mitigation for development of the San Miguel Ranch South Parcel. The City understands that the 166 northern acres will be managed by the USFWS. The 743-acre San Miguel Ranch South Parcel contains areas proposed for development by Trimark, areas within the proposed development footprint of State Route 125 (SR 125), and open space areas. The areas designated as open space (OS-I through OS-9) within the San Miguel Ranch South Parcel total approximately 223 acres. Of the total open space acreage, 169 acres within OS-I, 3, 6, and 7 comprise the SMR-OSP. Of the remaining 54 acres, 16 are contiguous to the SMR-OSP. The final boundaries of the SMR-OSP area shall be adjusted to exclude any area(s) where encroachment occurred (consistent with the terms of the Donation of Land agreement) and to include areas containing an offsetting amount of undisturbed vegetation originally outside the boundaries the SMR-OSP. Such "offset" areas shall be selected by Trimark in consultation with USFWS and CDFG. All undeveloped areas within the contiguous 16 acres associated with OS-I, 3, 6, and 7, are anticipated ultimately to be placed into the SMR-OSP and transferred to Refuges. The remaining 38 acres will be designated as open space including but not limited to such uses as parks, open recreation land, or cultural landscaping, but they will not be managed as part of the natural open space system. These other open space areas, OS-2, 4, 5, 8, and 9, are not part of the SMR-OSP; therefore, they are not addressed within the Fencing Plan. Table 1. 23.98 100.92 31.04 20.30 11.0 LOCA nON The 743-acre San Miguel Ranch South Parcel project site is located in Sections 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, and 28 of Township 17 South, Range 1 West of the USGS 7.5' Jamul Mountains Quadrangle, San Bernardino Base & Meridian (Figure 1). The project site is located in an unincorporated area of San Diego County, adjacent to the northeastern border of the City of Chula Vista south of Sweetwater Reservoir and southwest of Mother Miguel Mountain. Proctor Valley Road provides access to the southern boundary of the site. Surrounding land uses are predominantly open space and residential or recreational development. The SMR-OSP lies adjacent to existing preserve lands under the management of the Otay Water District and San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E). The San Miguel Ranch Northern Parcel, part of the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge, lies north of the SDG&E preserve lands. These areas together comprise a substantial portion of the largest contiguous preserve area in the southwestern portion of the MSCP area. The SMR-OSP does not provide connectivity to any preserve habitats south of Proctor Valley Road. A""'r~.' .e. 4 "_fU1rint'..'f. Inc. N 96417()"14 {" /1> /~j 2 12/12/00 TUB 14:11 FAX 619 560 5465 +H HEWITr MAGUIRE ~006 San Miguel Ranch South Open Space Preserve Fencing Plan December 2000 GENERAL PHYSIOGRAPHY The project site consists of steep hillsides, valleys, and mesas ranging from a high elevation of approximately 900 feet to a low elevation of approximately 220 feet. Underlying geology is mapped as Upper Pliocene marine (Strand 1962). On-site soils consist mostly of Diablo Clay, Linne clay loam, and Olivenhain cobbly loam. However, the largest tract of open space (OS-3) on-site contains San Miguel Exchequer rock silt loam. This soil type has very low fertility, good drainage, medium to rapid runoff, and moderate to very high erosion hazard (Bowman 1973). /hl'9'/I.// 3 U#r~#1 of, A....nciates. Inc. II 96.07()./4 AX 619 560 5465 TUE 14:11 F - 12/12/00 HEWI'IT MAGUIRE -+++ ~007 lIOO.ooo .... &DO 0 Figure 1 - 1211?/00 TUE14: 14 FAX 619 560 5465 ~~~ HEWITT MAGUIRE 1i!I00B San Miguel Ranch South Open Space Preserve Fencing Plan December 2000 PURPOSE The preserve perimeter fencing will prevent private access into the SMR-OSP and is expected to reduce potential edge effects and indirect impacts caused by human intrusion. The fencing is also expected to prevent illegal encroachment, such as orchards, storage, decks, etc., into the SMR-OSP. FENCING METHODS The preserve perimeter fence will consist of a permanent five-foot tall commercial grade four- stranded, non-barbed fence with appropriate lockable vehicle gates to control access into the preserve areas. The Fencing Installation Exhibit (Figure 2) indicates the SMR-OSP fencing locations. Further details including the specific standards of the posts wi\1 be addressed in the Master Fencing and Wall Plan for the project. To provide an additional barrier between the residential lots and the SMR-OSP, post and rail fencing will be provided at the end of the following cul-de-sacs: CC, DO, EE, FF, 00, HR, KK, YY, Band D (see the Tentative Fencing Plan for locations of these areas). Additional details regarding the post and rail fencing and a depiction of the location at the aforementioned cul-de-sac locations will be supplied in the Master Fencing and Wall Plan. In addition to the fencing requirement, the SMR-OSP wi\1 be posted to indicate that the area is a managed wildlife refuge and that access is permitted only on established trails. Appropriate signage will be developed which addresses both access restrictions and a littering prohibition. The posting of such signage is further detailed in the subsequent Signage Section. The timing for fence construction wi\l be dictated by the construction schedule. Temporary or permanent fencing (at the determination of the property owner) will be installed around SMR-OSP areas prior to project construction. If temporary fencing is installed during construction, permanent fencing will be installed subsequently and prior to occupation of the houses bordering that portion of the SMR-OSP. BORDER PATROL ACCESS AND TRAILs A regional recreational trail is proposed within the SMR-OSP. The OS-3 regional trail, as proposed, will follow existing dirt roads as much as possible rather than entering habitat or wildlife movement areas. It is located in the northern portion of OS-3, near the project area boundary and continues east off site and west adjacent to proposed development. The proposed OS-3 trail wi\1 be a lO-foot wide regional trail consisting of informal stabilized decomposed granite. Although this proposed trail is wider than the specifications included in the Draft Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan (MNA Consulting 2000), it appears to be the least impactive option after several alternatives were analyzed, especially since the wider trail has the capability of doubling as an SDG&E maintenance access route. It wi\1 require a minimum construction grading width of 14 feet. A community trail is located within OS-7 in the western portion of San Miguel Ranch. The proposed community trail will be a five foot wide graded footpath with stabilized decomposed granite across open grasslands. Trail staging areas will remain outside of the SMR-OSP. Merkel & Associates. Inc. # 96-070-14 /'~ f) - Ii:... 5 12/1~/00 TUB 14:14 FAX 619 560 5465 -H-> HEWITT MAGUIRE ~009 San Miguel Ranch South Open Space Preserve Fencing Plan December 2000 The proposed OS-3' trail intersects with an existing border patrol route; however, border patrol vehicle patrols will not continue along this route once the SMR-OSP has been established. Where an intersection of the proposed OS-3 trail and the previous border patrol access road occurs, the trail is to be clearly marked and fenced to prevent intrusion into the SMR-OSP. The proposed OS-7 trail does not coincide with an SDG&E easement or border patrol route and is thus not expected to require additional signage or fencing to prevent intrusion into the SMR-OSP along previously established routes. A post and rail fence will be provided continuously on the down-slope of the regional and community trails where they traverses the SMR-OSP and in a configuration jointly deemed warranted by Trimark, the City, and Refuges with the objective that biological resources are protected. The details and location of this fencing will be provided in the Master Fencing and Wall Plan. It is expected that split-rail fencing will be the appropriate barrier to control most trail adjacency issues. Additional barriers such as rocks/boulders or cactus plantings may be subsequently utilized at the discretion of Refuges, but will not be installed by Trimark in conjunction with fencing. Signage will be utilized in conjunction with this fencing to direct trails users from veering off the trail where it enters and exits the preserve or bends substantially. The specifics of this trail signage are detailed in the subsequent Signage Section and provided on the Master Fencing and Wall Plan. SIGNAGE PERIMETER FENCE POSTING In addition to the fencing requirement, the SMR-OSP will be posted every 300 feet, or less, if acceptable to Refuges and the City, to indicate that the area is a managed wildlife preserve/refuge and that access is permitted only on established trails. It is anticipated that this signage will be similar in size and nature to that employed by Refuges at other National Wildlife Refuges within the region. TRAIL FENCE POSTING The location where the regional trail enters andlor exits the preserve/refuge will be posted. The sign will identify the area as a conservation area and indicate that users must remain on the trail. These signs will also be posted within the preserve at any location where the trail changes direction by more than 45 degrees or where sensitive resources adjacent to the trail make such additional signage advisable. Furthermore, trail signs will indicate that littering, fues, and overnight camping are prohibited. The exact wording of the signs will be jointly determined by Trimark, the City, and Refuges and provided in the Master Fencing and Wall Plan. MerJceI & Associates, Inc. # 96-070-14 /& 19 ~,/tI~ 6 These Indicate openings in the fence line to allow trail passage " " ":>' .:b Poat end r.srenc:e.. bepftWlded condnuousfy an !he daWIHIDpe or .. NQJonaIlrall wherw IIlnl\1WSH U. --- ,{ NRBIfK1nIJ Trail NCamullIyTron NPropoud FencIng ~tion NPniIod Boundry NT_phy ~ San Miguel Ranch Proposed Fendng Plan Rgure 2 Merkel & AnocIBlM. Inc - . - -- _ 0... SouI'C8: HulII8Imr .... '" " .... '" " o o ~ .... ... .... ... .., ~ '" .... '" ... '" o ... ... '" ... ... ... ... !iJ "l .... ~ ~ g .... ~ JeiI o .... o ~ 12/12/00 TUB 14:17 FAX 619 560 5465 ~~~ HEWITT MAGUIRE ~011 San Miguel Ranch South Open Space Preserve Fencing Plan December 2000 LITERATURE CITED Bowman, Roy H. 1973. Soil Survey, San Diego Area, California. U.S. Department of Agriculture. December, 1973. City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department. 2000. Comments on the San Miguel Ranch South Open Space Preserve Area-Specific Management Plan-Fencing and Signage. MNA Consulting. 2000. Draft City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan Revisions. October 9, 2000. MNA Consulting. 2000. Draft City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan. September 11, 2000. Strand, Rudolph G. 1962. Geologic Map of California, San Diego-El Centro Sheet (fourth printing 1993). State of Cali fomi a, The Resources Agency Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology. Merkel & Associates, Inc. # 96-070-14 ,/,,~ .1 .'/J/"- ..,,'7' /-' 8 . 12/12/00 TUB 14:17 FAX 619 560 5465 ->->-> HEWITI MAGUIRE ~012 San Miguel Ranch South Open Space Preserve Fencing Plan December 2000 APPENDIX A Merkel & AssocIates, Inc. # 96-070-J 4 /0/1 Ii' I" ;j A-J 12/12/00 TUB 14:18 FAX 619 560 5465 ~~~ HEWITT MAGUIRE 1i!J013 Cost EstiltUlte: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH SAN MIGUEL RANCH OPEN SPACE PRESERVE FENCING PLAN Task PHASE 1. PRESERVE ESTABLISHMENT Basis for Costs: Four Strand Fencing Two Rail Split Rail Fence Boundary Sig"",e Task 1. Boundary Demarcation and Fencing Survey and Stake Preserve Boundary Install Pennanent Fence and GaleS Signage Monitoring Task J Subtolal Task 2. Split Rail TraU Fencing Survey and Stake Trail Alignment Install Pennanent Fence Signage Monitoring Task 2 Subtotal Description Rate Hours Subtotal ($/hour) or Units Total 28,800 linear feet 8,760 linear feet 300 ft. between rigns Two Person Survey Crew $140.00 40.00 $5,600.00 Biological Technician $60.00 24.00 $1,440.00 Fencing Cost - Includes Labor $2.20 28,800 $63,360.00 V chicle Oates $680.00 4.00 $2,720.00 Material Costs $30.00 96.00 $2,880.00 Installation Labor $25.00 12.00 $300.00 Fence Installation Monitoring $60.00 80.00 $4,800.00 I $81,100.00 I Two Person Survey Crew $140.00 8.00 $1,120.00 Biological Technician $60.00 8.00 $480.00 Fencing Cost - Includes LabOr $4.70 8,760 $41,172.00 Malerial Costs $150.00 8.00 $1,200.00 Installation LabOr $25.00 16.00 $400.00 Fence Installation Monitoring $60.00 24.00 $1,440.00 I $45,812.00 I $126,912.00 $25,382.40 ESTIMATED COST FOR PHASE 1 Contingency Funds (20%) ESTIMATE WITH CONTINGENCY COSTS $152,294.40 Ii ".1 " /t..i ./..., !!:Jr''- !/, E>U., I b ; t 3 ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIR-97-02 PROJECT NAME: San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement PROJECT LOCATION: San Miguel Ranch SPA Plan and TM Area. PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department CASE NO: IS-OI-032 DATE: December 13, 2000 I. BACKGROUND A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SElR) for the San Miguel Ranch SPA and Tentative Maps (ElR 97-02) was certified on October 19, 1999. The SElR addressed the development of a Master-planned community with 1,394 residential units, elementary school, a community service facility, community and neighborhood parks, and a retail commercial center. The SElR acknowledges that the San Miguel Ranch site is within the City of Chula Vista's Sphere of Influence but outside of the unincorporated area in the County of San Diego, and thus would require annexation to the City for project approval. The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) approved the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization in April 2000, subject to completion of an Annexation Agreement under the provisions of the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP). The San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement, which is an agreement between the County of San Diego, the City of Chula Vista, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and the San Miguel developer, NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, is required by LAFCO as well both the County and City MSCP Subarea Plans. The Agreement specifically describes all MSCP-related requirements that must be met to meet the biological mitigation, conservation and management goals of the MSCP, as delineated in the San Miguel Ranch FSElR-97-02 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan. II. THE PROPOSED PROJECT The San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement adds minor technical changes that require review under CEQA to make the previously approved FSElR 97-02 adequate under CEQA. Specifically, the Agreement: 1) clarifies the acreage of undisturbed habitat being conveyed to open space in perpetuity to mitigate for impacts from project development and as a result of extensive negotiations with the City, USFWS and CDFG; 2) changes the long-term management assumption for the open space preserve from the applicant or other entity to the USFWS; and 3) supersedes the MMRP mitigation requirement for Trimark to prepare, and the City to approve, a management plan for the Otay Tarplant preserve. These changes are discussed in detail below. EIR-97-02 Addendum #1 12/14/00 ..?/) ! 4':', 1. Open Space Acreage The Annexation Agreement clarifies the total acreage of undisturbed habitat to be conserved in biological open space, whereas the FSEIR states an overall open space acreage that includes all open space, natural and landscaped. The Agreement states that Trimark shall assure the conservation of approximately 346 acres of biologically important habitat located partly on San Miguel Ranch North and partly on San Miguel Ranch. Specifically, approximately 166 acres will be transferred in fee to the United States of America for inclusion in the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge in the San Miguel North parcel. In addition, approximately 182 acres of undisturbed vegetation in the Eastern, Western and Central Open Space areas in San Miguel Ranch will be conserved. This acreage includes the 37-acre Otay Tarplant Preserve. In addition, Trimark shall provide for an additional approximately 5.2 acres in the Western Open Space Area of San Miguel Ranch intended for additional Otay Tarplant Acreage. The clarification of acreage of undisturbed vegetation to be retained in open space to offset biological impacts of future development satisfies the biological mitigation requirements in the FSEIR. 2. Long-Term Open Space Management AssumPtions The Annexation Agreement provides the details for the long-term management of the undisturbed open space. Specifically, the open space land will be transferred to the USFWS as part of the National Wildlife Refuge The Agreement also specifies that the USFWS shall prepare a management plan for the species and habitats within the open space areas referenced in the Agreement consistent with the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, Refuge Recreation Act of 1962, the Endangered Species Act and Executive Order 12996 (Management and General Public Use of the National Wildlife Refuge System). The Agreement assures that funding will be available to the USFWS to implement the biological conservation and mitigation measures required of the Agreement. The FSEIR assumed that the long-term management of such lands was the responsibility of the applicant or other entity. The transfer of long-term management and maintenance responsibility from the applicant, or other entity, to the USFWS would not result in a significant environmental impact. 3. Otav Tarplant Management Plan The Annexation Agreement supercedes the obligation for Trimark to prepare, and the City to approve, a management plan for the Otay Tarplant preserve, which is a MMRP mitigation measure. The Annexation Agreement states that Trimark will comply with all other provisions of the San Miguel Ranch SPA Plan FSEIR/MMRP and conditions of approval. The Agreement meets the intent of this MMRP mitigation requirement by the transfer of undisturbed open space, including Otay Tarplant habitat, to the USFWS for maintenance and management, and the requirement for the USFWS to prepare a management plan for the species and habitats within the open space areas referenced in the Agreement consistent with the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, Refuge Recreation Act of 1962, the Endangered Species Act and Executive Order 12996 (Management and General Public Use of the National Wildlife Refuge System). 2 1V14/00 EIR-97-02 Addendum #1 el) fi/9 The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista allow the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) to prepare an addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration if one of the following conditions exists: 1. The minor changes in the project design which have occurred since completion of the San Miguel Ranch FSEIR (97-02) have not created any new significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the FSEIR. 2. Additional or refined information available since completion of the FSEIR regarding potential environmental impacts of the project, or regarding the measures or alternatives available to mitigate potential environmental effects of the project, does not show that the project will have one or more significant impacts which were not previously addressed in the FSEIR. This addendum has been prepared to pursuant to the requirements of Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines. This document specifically addresses the three technical changes included in the MSCP Annexation Agreement related to the analysis and conclusions of the San Miguel Ranch SPA and TM (FSEIR 97-02). III. ANALYSIS An Environmental Checklist Form was completed to determine if the Annexation Agreement would change any of the analyses or conclusions contained in FSEIR-97-02. None of the three technical changes proposed by the Agreement result in a physical change to the environment, or add or intensify the environmental impacts identified in the FSEIR. No new mitigation measures are required. A copy of the checklist is attached. IV. CONCLUSION Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, and based upon the above discussion, I hereby find that the project revisions to the proposed project will result in only minor technical changes or additions which are necessary to make the FSEIR for San Miguel Ranch SPA and TMs (97-02) adequate under CEQA. 2~f::q~ft;- Environmental Review Coordinator Attachments: Environmental Checklist Form References: City of Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures San Miguel Ranch SPA and TM FSEIR (97-02) 3 /j/ 150 12/14/00 ElR-97-Q2 Addendum #1 Case No. IS-OI-032 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Name of Proponent: City of Chnla Vista 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 3. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Same as above 4. Name of Proposal: San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement 5. Date of Checklist: December 13, 2000 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impod Mitigated Impact Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or 0 0 0 [j$] zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 0 0 [j$] policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., 0 0 0 [j$] impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an 0 0 0 [j$] established community (including a low-income or minority community)? Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language does not have an effect upon land use. II. POPULA nON AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? o o o [j$] 1 ~JI-I j r;,/ b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language does not have an effect upon population or housing. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant U""~ Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 0 0 0 lRl o o o lRl III. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic 0 0 0 lRl substructures? b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or 0 0 0 lRl overcovering of the soil? c) Change in topography or ground surface relief 0 0 0 lRl features? d) The destruction, covering or modification of any 0 0 0 lRl unique geologic or physical features? e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, 0 0 0 lRl either on or off the site? f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, 0 0 0 lRl or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay inlet or lake? g) Exposure of people or property to geologic 0 0 0 lRl hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language does not have an effect upon geological resources. IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? o o o lRl b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? o o o lRl 2 ,I.~;:' f r~) .;/ - -,.....- Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact lmpad C) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration D D D [R] of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 [R] water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of 0 0 0 [R] water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 [R] through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? D D D [R] h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 [R] i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? 0 0 0 [R] j) Substantial reduction in the amount of water 0 0 0 [R] otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation reqnirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS, The proposed language does not have an effect upon water quantity, direction or quality. V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 0 0 0 [R] an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 [R] c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or 0 0 0 [R] cause any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d) Create objectionable odors? 0 0 0 [R] e) Create a substantial increase in stationary or non- 0 0 0 [R] stationary sources of air emissions or the deterioration of ambient air quality? Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language does not have an effect upon air quality. VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION, Would the proposal result in: 3 , I ,~- I ") i Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 0 IRI b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 IRI sharp CUrveS or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby 0 0 0 IRI uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? 0 D D IRI e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? D 0 D IRI f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting D D D IRI alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? D D D IRI h) A "large project" under the Congestion D 0 D IRI Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips.) Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language does not have an effect upon transportation/circulation. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of D D D IRI concern or species that are candidates for listing? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? D D D IRI c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g, oak D D D IRI forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal D D D IRI pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? D D D IRI f) Affect regional habitat preservation planning D D D IRI efforts? 4 1( J.... Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Less than Significant Impact N. Impact Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language does not result in a physical change to the environment, does not identify a new biological impact and does not change the conclusions of the biological analysis in the FSEIR 97-02. The clarification of acreage of undisturbed vegetation to be retained in open space to offset biological impacts of future development satisfies the biological mitigation requirements in the FSEIR. The transfer of long-term management and maintenance responsibility from the applicant, or other entity, to the USFWS would not result in a significant environmental impact. The Agreement meets the intent of the MMRP mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarant Management Plan by: a) the transfer of undisturbed open space, including Otay Tarplant habitat, to the USFWS for maintenance and management, and b) the requirement for the USFWS to prepare a management plan for the species and habitats within the open space areas referenced in the Agreement consistent with the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, Refuge Recreation Act of 1962, the Endangered Species Act and Executive Order 12996 (Management and General Public Use of the National Wildlife Refuge System). VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 1RI plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 1RI inefficient manner? c) If the site is designated for mineral resource 0 0 0 1RI protection, will this project impact this protection? Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language would not have an effect upon energy or mineral resources. IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: petroleum products, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? o o o 1RI b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? o o o 1RI c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? o o o 1RI 5 ~jJ ! . ~- :,) Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant N. Impact Mitigated Impact Impact d) Exposure of people to existing sources of D D D 00 potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable D D D 00 brush, grass, or trees? Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language does not have an effect upon hazardous resources. X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? D D D D D D 00 b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 00 Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language does not have an effect upon noise levels. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? D D D 00 b) Police protection? D D D 00 c) Schools? D D D 00 d) Maintenance of public facilities, including D D D 00 roads? e) Other governmental services? D D D 00 Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language does not have an effect upn public services. XII. Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely impact the City's Threshold Standards? As described below, the proposed project does not adversely impact any of the seen Threshold Standards. a) FirelEMS D D D 00 The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. 6 i /~ /.J?'~'; /6~ Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Less than Significant Impact No Impact Comments: The proposed langnage in the Annexation Agreement does not have an effect upon the City's thresholds standards relative to Fire/EMS because it would have no effect upon public services. b) Police The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority I calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. o o o [R] Comments: The proposed language in the Annexation Agreement does not have an effect upon the City's thresholds standards relative to police protection because it would have no effect upon public services.. c) Traffic o o o [R] The Threshold Standards require that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better. with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "0" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west ofI-80S are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. Comments: The proposed language in the Annexation Agreement does not have an effect upon the City's thresholds standards relative to traffic because it would have no effect upon transportation/circulation. d) ParkslRecreation The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/I.OOO population. o o o [R] Comments: The proposed language in the Annexation Agreement does not have an effect upon the City's thresholds standards relative to parks/recreation because it would have no effect upon recreational resources. e) Drainage o o o [R] The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. Comments: The proposed language in the Annexation Agreement does not have an effect upon the City's thresholds standards relative to drainage because it would not effect storm water flows and volumes. f) Sewer o o o [R] The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. 7 I! /' 'I.... -~ / \t.- T .' .., r. Potentially Signiftcant Impact Potentially Signiftcant Unless Mitigated Less than Significant '-" No Impact Comments: The proposed language in the Annexation Agreement does not have an effect upon the City's thresholds standards relative to sewer because it would have no effect upon public services and utilities. o o o lEl g) Water The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Comments: The proposed language in the Annexation Agreement does not have an effect upon the City's thresholds standards relative to water storage, treatment or transmission because it would have no effect upon public services and utilities. XIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 lEl b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 lEl c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 lEl facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 lEl e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 lEl f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 lEl Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language would not have an effect upon utilities and services. XIV. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? o o o lEl b) Cause the destruction or modification of a scenic route? o o o lEl c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? o o o lEl 8 . Iy! c'/' d) Create added light or glare sources that could increase the level of sky glow in an area or cause this project to fail to comply with Section 19.66.100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 19? e) Reduce an additional amount of spill light? Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact :Mitigated Impact Impact D D D [RJ D D [RJ D Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language would not have an effect upon aesthetics. XV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction or a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? e) Is the area identified on the City's General Plan EIR as an area of high potential for archeological resources? D D [RJ D D [RJ D D D [RJ D D D D [RJ D D D D [RJ Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language would not have an effect upon cultural resources. XVI. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of paleontological resources? D [RJ D D Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language would not have an effect upon paleontological resources. XVII. RECREATION. Would the proposal: 9 ~/(;/) /5(1 Potentially Potentially Signilkant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact M.itigated Impact Impact a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or D D D [8] regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? D D D [8] c) Interfere with recreation parks & recreation plans D D D [8] or programs? Comments: The subject technical changes proposed by the San Miguel Ranch MSCP Annexation Agreement clarify biological open space requirements, identify the long-term biological preserve manager, and transfer the mitigation requirement to prepare and approve an Otay Tarplant Management Plan to the USFWS. The proposed language would not have an effect upon regarding recreation. XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: . a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods or California history or prehistory? Comments: The proposed language does not change the physical environment, and therefore would not degrade the environment beyond what was analyzed in the FSEIR. D D D [8] b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term. to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? D D D [8] Comments: The proposed language does not address nor change the long-term vs. short-term impact analysis in the FSEIR. c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects. and the effects of probable future projects.) Comments: The proposed language does not address nor change the cumulative impacts analysis or conclusions in the FSEIR. D D D [8] d) Does the project have environmental effect which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? D D D [8] 10 CJ/ /00 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Less than Significant Impod N. Impact Comments: The proposed language does not create new environmental effects or intensify the environmental effects identified in the FSEIR 97-02. XIX. PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES: The following project revisions or mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project and will be implemented during the design. construction or operation of the project: No mitigation measures are required for the proposed language revisions included in the Annexation Agreement other than those alreadv required by the EIR. XX. AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT MITIGATION MEASURES By signing the line(s) provided below, the Applicant(s) and/or Operator(s) stipulate that they have each read, understood and have their respective company's authority to and do agree to the mitigation measures contained herein, and will implement same to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator. Failure to sign the line(s) provided below prior to posting of this [Mitigated] Negative Declaration with the County Clerk shall indicate the Applicants' and/or Operator's desire that the Project be held in abeyance without approval and that Applicant(s) and/or Operator(s) shall apply for an Environmental Impact Report. Not Applicable Printed Name and Title of Authorized Representative of [Property Owner's Name] Signature of Authorized Representative of [Property Owner's Name] Date Printed Name and Title of [Operator if different from Property Owner] Signature of Authorized Representative of [Operator if different from Property Owner] Date XXI. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. None 11 .f' /61 D Land Use and Planning D Population and Housing D Transportation/Circulation D Biological Resources D Public Services D Geophysical D Water D Energy and Mineral Resources D Hazards D Utilities and Service Systems D Aesthetics D Cultural Resources D Air Quality D Noise D Recreation D Mandatory Findings of Significance XXII. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, D and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, D there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an D ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at D least one effect: 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impacts" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the [gJ environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. An addendum has been prepared to provide a record of this determination. ?1~t:V//?h1Q p' Marilyn .F. Ponseggi J Environmental Review Coordinator City of Chula Vista Date /.2/I~bO 12 ,/ 1& Re,~ j ~e..O I.;;}-Iq-OO #/6 RESOLUTION NO. Clooo- '-Il?I RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM (MSCP) ANNEXATION AGREEMENT FOR THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH PROJECT AMONG THE CITY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, AND NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC, CONCERNING THE CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGICAL MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT, AND ADOPTING ADDENDUM IS- 01-032 TO THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND TENTATIVE MAP (FSEIR 97-02) WHEREAS, on October 19, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution 19631 approving the approximately 743 acre San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and related documents; and WHEREAS, on February 29, 2000, the City Council approved a Master Tentative Subdivision Map for the approximately 743 acre San Miguel Ranch project by Resolution No. 2000-068; and WHEREAS, the project area is currently within the unincorporated County of San Diego, and requires annexation to the City prior to the approval of any Final Subdivision Maps or the issuance of any grading or other permits for the project; and WHEREAS, the project is also located within the boundaries of the adopted County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) (as shown on Exhibit 1) Subarea Plan, South County Segment; and WHEREAS, The County of San Diego MSCP Subarea Plan Implementing Agreement (IA) specifies, in Section 9.19, that: "In the event land within the County's jurisdiction is annexed to another jurisdiction, an agreement shall be reached between County, the annexing jurisdiction, USFWS, and CDFG, as part of the annexation process, to ensure that any development of the annexed lands proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP (and, if the annexing jurisdiction is a Participating Local Jurisdiction, the goals of the Jurisdiction's Subarea Plan) and sets forth the resulting responsibilities pursuant to the MSCP for ongoing maintenance and enforcement of the terms of this agreement and the MSCP as it relates to the annexed land."; and WHEREAS, the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan requires that, when new territory is added to the City through annexation, "An MSCP Annexation Agreement shall be reached between the City ofChula Vista, the detaching jurisdiction, USFWS and fCoA.-1 CDFG, as part of the annexation process, to ensure that any development of the annexed land proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP." (Section 4.3.1); and WHEREAS, on November 22, 1999, Trimark Pacific-San Miguel, LLC, filed an application by landowner petition with the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the approximately 743 acre San Miguel Ranch project area to the City ofChula Vista from the unincorporated area of the County; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2000, the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) adopted a Resolution (Ref. No. R099-42) approving the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization subject to conditions, one of which reads, "Pursuant to requirements of the County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) regarding the mmexation ofland, the County, City ofChula Vista, the United States United States Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department ofFish and Game and the property owner shall execute an agreement in accordance with the requirements of the MSCP, prior to recordation of the certificate of completion for the San Miguel Rmlch Reorganization"; and WHEREAS, the City, County of San Diego, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department ofFish and Game (CDFG) and the project applicant NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, have negotiated and prepared the required MSCP Annexation Agreement ("Agreement") for the San Miguel Ranch project (attached hereto as Exhibit 2); and WHEREAS, as required by LAFCO, and pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.19 of the County of San Diego MSCP lA, the Agreement contains necessary provisions to ensure that any development of the annexed lands under the City's jurisdiction proceeds in accordance with the conservation goals of the MSCP, and sets forth the resulting responsibilities pursuant to the MSCP for ongoing maintenance and enforcement of the terms of the Agreement and the MSCP as it relates to San Miguel Ranch; and WHEREAS, the Agreement also serves as a mechanism that will enable the legal "Take" ofMSCP covered species and associated habitats within San Miguel Ranch, prior to final federal and State approval of the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and issuance of federal and State Endangered Species Act permits to the City; and WHEREAS, a Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR-97-02) for the San Miguel Ranch project and annexation was certified by the City Council on October 19, 1999, by Resolution No. 19630 along with attendant Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and WHEREAS, the Annexation Agreement will result in only minor technical changes or additions which are necessary to make the FSEIR 97-02 adequate under 2 /c;,A-<s' CEQA, and Addendum IS-OI-032 to FSEIR 97-02 has been prepared in conformance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines (Addendum attached as Exhibit 3). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows: I. The City Council does hereby determine that no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is necessary for the City to approve the Agreement. 2. The City Council does hereby find that the Addendum FSEIR-97-02, the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for this Project have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City ofChula Vista. 3. The City Council approves the MSCP Annexation Agreement presented in Exhibit I attached hereto and made a part hereof, and authorizes the Mayor to sign the Agreement of behalf of the City, provided, however, that certain Side Agreement to the Annexation Agreement identified herein is executed by Trimark and USFWS.. 4. That the City Council approves the Grading Agreement and Side Agreement to the Annexation Agreement presented in Exhibit 1 A and Exhibit I B, respectively, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and authorizes the Mayor to sign the Agreements on behalf of the City. 5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file certified copies of this resolution with the Executive Officer ofLAFCO. 6. That, pursuant to the condition of approval under Item 3.b ofLAFCO Resolution R099-42, the Executive Officer ofLAFCO will not issue a certificate of completion for the purposes of finalization and recordation of the reorganization until the Agreement has become effective. Presented by Approved as to form by LA-- /J{,(~ frCK John M. Kaheny - City Attorney Robert A. Leiter Director of Planning & Building (H\shared\san-mig\ Council MSCP Agreement Resolution.doc) 3 I G:,A.-..:1. IA AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2000, by and between NNP-Trimark San Miguel Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Trimark) and the city of Chula vista (city), a municipal corporation. Trimark hereby agrees as follows: NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC agrees to modify the storm drain system, known as line "Fa as shown on sheet 00040-34 of the grading plans, to diminish offsite erosion caused by increased runoff to the tributary stream. The modification shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and will be added as a construction change to the plans prior to any installation of permanent improvements. (NEXT PAGE IS SIGNATURE PAGE) 1 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN NNP-TRlMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement on the date specified above. CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPLICANT NNP- TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Shirley Horton, Mayor BY: ATTEST: Stephen E. Hester Its: Vice President Approved as to form: By: Susan Bigelow city Clerk Approved as to form: Andrew Hartzell Attorney for Applicant By: John M. Kaheny city Attorney H:\Home\Attorney\Agree\Trimark.SMR 2 \13 Agreement Concerning Conservation of 166 acres on San Miguel North Side Agreement To The Annexation Agreement Concerning The Conservation and Biological Mitigation Program for the Implementation of San Miguel Ranch By and Among The City of Chula Vista The United States Fish and Wildlife Service And NNP- Trimark San Miguel Ranch, LLC The City ofChula Vista (CITY), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and NNP-Trimark San Miguel Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (TRIMARK) are each a party to that Agreement known as the Annexation Agreement Concerning the Conservation and Biological Mitigation Program for the Implementation of San Miguel Ranch (the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT) (herein collectively referred to as the "Parties"). The ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provides for the conservation of certain property within the project area known as San Miguel Ranch and within the area known as San Miguel North. The ORIGINAL AGREEMENT also provides for the transfer of Take Authorizations, as such pertain to the San Miguel Ranch, for Incidental Take of Covered Species Subject to Incidental Take. The ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provides that the existing Take Authority of the County of San Diego (COUNTY) with respect to the San Miguel Ranch will transfer to CITY. CITY, as a condition ofUSFWS and California Department ofFish and Game (CDFG) approving the transfer of the Take Authorization~, acknowledges that TRIMARK is required to implement a number of provisions, including the conservation of certain property and transfer of such property in fee title to the United States of America for inclusion in the San Diego Wildlife Refuge (the Refuge). The property required to be conserved and transferred in fee title to the Refuge includes 166 acres located in San Miguel North (the "San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel"), as depicted on Exhibit F and legally described on Exhibit G in the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. RECITALS A. WHEREAS, TRIMARK is the owner of approximately 166 acres known as the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel. B. WHEREAS, CITY, USFWS and TRIMARK are parties to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. C. WHEREAS, Exhibit 1, Section A(i) of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provides the following: "As soon as practicable after the Effective Date, and subject to Section 6(C)ofthis Agreement, TRIMARK shall cause the transfer, in fee, of 166 acres located in San Miguel North, as depicted on Exhibit F and legally described on Exhibit G (the "San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel") to the United States of America for inclusion in the San Diego Wildlife Refuge. As of the date that CITY has extended the Incidental Take authority to TRIMARK, the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel shall only be utilized in a manner consistent with conservation purposes and shall be fully accessible to the managers and employees/subcontractors of the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge, who shall be entitled to take any actions they deem appropriate for conservation management. The San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel is not being annexed into CITY at this time; accordingly, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Agreement, CITY shall not be responsible for enforcing this Paragraph A(i)." D. WHEREAS, Tentative Map No. CVT 99-04, approved by CITY for the San Miguel Ranch Project, includes a condition that prior to approval of a final map, the applicant (TRIMARK) shall enter into a Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SSIA) with CITY which shall delineate, to the satisfaction of CITY, that applicant (TRIM ARK) has satisfied mitigation measures required by the adopted San Miguel Ranch Environmental Impact Report (EIR). E. WHEREAS, the adopted San Miguel Ranch EIR, finds that "the mitigation measures for this project will include implementation of the previously agreed upon requirements established within a Conservation Bank Agreement... signed.... With the USFWS and the CDFG in August 1997." F. WHEREAS, the Conservation Bank Agreement referenced by the San Miguel Ranch EIR provides for the conservation of the 166-acre San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel. 2 G. WHEREAS, the County Subarea Plan Figure I-I depicts the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel as land which is to be conserved, subject to agreement with USFWS; and Section 3.3.3.5 of the County Subarea Plan specifies that the subject agreement provides for "166 acres of the Northern Parcel to be preserved." H. WHEREAS, the Implementing Agreement between the County of San Diego and USFWS serves as the contract through which the County implements its MSCP Subarea Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES TO AGREEMENT AGREES AS FOLLOWS: I.) NOTWITHSTANDING the provisions of Exhibit I, Section A(i) of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, pursuant to this Side Agreement to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, CITY, USFWS and TRIMARK do hereby represent and warrant the following: A. CITY CITY hereby acknowledges that it will enforce provision A( I) of Exhibit I of the original agreement by requiring Trimark to convey San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel to the San Diego Wildlife Refuse in accordance with the terms herein. B. USFWS USFWS hereby acknowledges that, upon delivery by TRIMARK to the United States of a good and sufficient grant deed conveying to the United States a marketable title to the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel of such character as to be satisfactory to the Attorney General of the United States, it will accept the transfer offee title of the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel, and will assume all liability and responsibility for continued conservation, maintenance and management of the land. USFWS further acknowledges that CITY shall not be held responsible for such maintenance or management. C. TRIMARK TRIMARK acknowledges and agrees that Condition IS of Tentative Tract Map No. CVT 99-04 requires the full conveyance of the San Miguel North Mitigation Parcel to the San Diego Wildlife Refuge prior to approval by CITY of the first final map for the San Miguel Ranch Project. TRIMARK further acknowledges and agrees to convey said parcel to the San Diego Wild Life Refuge prior to approval by the City of the first final map for the Project. 3 2.) NOTWITHSTANDING Section 6 (C) of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, USFWS agrees that THE City shall not accept Take Authority from the County pursuant to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT ifTRIMARK exercises its right pursuant to this provision to not perform under the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. In such instance, USFWS agrees that the CITY shall not have any obligations to perform in accordance with the provisions of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. 3.) Prior to the CITY's approval of the First Final Map that contains any property within the San Miguel Ranch Project located west ofSR-125, TRIMARK shall provide the CITY with proof of its compliance, to the CITY's satisfaction, with paragraph _ of the sideletter dated December ,2000 between TRIMARK and USFWS, which letter is attached hereto as Exhibit _ of the CITY's Take Authority Permit. 4 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT CONCERNING CONSERVATION OF 166 ACRES ON SAN MIGUEL NORTH IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement. CITY OF CHULA VISTA UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of The Department ofInterior of the United States of America By: Shirley Horton Mayor By: Michael Spear Title: ATTEST: Susan Bigelow City Clerk NNP- TRIM ARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Stephen E. Hester Its: Vice President John M. Kaheny, City Attorney By: H: \H ome\A ttorney\Agree\SM R. Side .doc 5 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH FISCAL DEFICIT ACCOUNT, REQUIRING NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC, TO DEPOSIT AN INITIAL $10,000.00 INTO SAID ACCOUNT PRIOR TO ANNEXATION, AND REQUIRING NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC, PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF ANY FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE PROJECT, TO EST ABLTSH AND FUND A PERMANENT MECHANISM TO PAY THE CITY FOR FINANCING THE PREPARATION OF IS ANNUAL FISCAL REVIEWS AND DEFICIT ANALYSES FOR THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH PROJECT, AND FOR ANY FISCAL DEFICITS IDENTIFIED BY THE ANNUAL REVIEWS AND ANALYSES WHEREAS, the San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SP A) Plan and Public Facilities Financing Plan/Fiscal Impact Analysis (PFFP/FIA) were approved by the City Council on October 19, 1999, by Resolution No. 19631; and WHEREAS, the PFFP/FIA identified that the San Miguel Ranch Project would operatc at an annual net fiscal deficit to the City; and WHEREAS, condition no. 22 of Resolution 19631 required the project applicant to establish a mechanism to mitigate that deficit to the City's satisfaction prior to annexation of the project site; and WHEREAS, on February 29,2000, the City Council approved a Master Tentative Subdivision Map for the San Miguel Ranch project by Resolution No. 2000-068; and WHEREAS, condition nos. 95a. & b. of Resolution No. 2000-068 further specified the applicant's responsibility to establish an account to finance the preparation of annual fiscal reviews and deficit analyses for the project, and to establish a permanent mechanism, prior to approval of the first Final Map within the project, to pay the City for the ongoing preparation of the annual reviews, and for any fiscal deficits identified by the annual reviews; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2000, the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) adopted a Resolution (Ref. No. R099-42) approving the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization subject to conditions, one of which reads "Pursuant to conditions regarding a forecasted annual fiscal deficit, contained in the SPA and Tentative Map, the property owner will establish and fund a mitigating mechanism to the City's satisfaction"; and I"~::'".; . it". _ WHEREAS, the City, as LAFCO's designated conducting authority, is ready to consider the San Miguel Reorganization and to order the changes of organization pursuant to LAFCO's Resolution; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the City's noted conditions of approval in Resolution Nos. 19631, and LAFCO's noted condition of approval, it is now necessary to establish and fund a mitigating mechanism; and WHEREAS, Exhibit 2 attached hereto is an excerpt from the San Miguel Ranch PFFP/FIA and generally describes the forecasted annual fiscal deficit; and WHEREAS, Exhibit 3 attached hereto identifies potential accounting alternatives for ensuring payment to the City for any fiscal deficits resulting from the project, and which will be used to establish a permanent accounting mechanism prior to approval of the first Final Map within the project; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined, pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, that the actions proposed in this ordinance are in substantial conformance with the project analyzed in FSEIR-97-02 which was certified by the City Council on October 19, 1999, and that no further action is necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City ofChula Vista does ordain as follows: Section 1. Territory to Which Annual Fiscal Review and Deficit Analysis is Applicable. The area to which the San Miguel Ranch annual fiscal analysis funding herein established and which will be established prior to approval of the first Final Map shall be applicable to the project area defined in the SPA Plan and PFFP/FIA adopted by the City Council on October 19, 1999, and reflected on Exhibit 1 attached hereto. Section 2. Purpose. In accordance with applicable conditions of City Council Resolutions 19631, the purpose of this ordinance is to establish and fund a mechanism to mitigate the deficit for the San Miguel Ranch project. Section 3. Establishment and Funding Requirements of the San Miguel Ranch Fiscal Deficit Account, and Authority for Accounting and Expenditures The project applicant, NNP- Trimark San Miguel, LLC, shall, prior to final recordation of the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization, deposit an initial $10,000.00 dollars into an account with the City which is hereby created. The applicant, or their successors and assigns in-interest shall initially and at all times maintain a minimum balance of$10,000.00 in the Account. 2 /6~ -oJ.. Prior to approval of the first Final Map within the project, and subject to the approval of the City, the applicant shall establish and fund a permanent mechanism to satisfy the applicant's responsibility for funding preparation of the IS annual reviews, and for payment of the project's fiscal deficits identified by those reviews. Such permanent mechanism may include payment of a one time fee, a fee to be paid with each building permit, or other method acceptable to the City. Associated monies shall be placed into the above created Account. The Director of Finance is authorized to periodically make expenditures from the Account for the purposes set forth herein. Expenditures from the Account and any intcrest earned thereon shall be accounted for separately from other City accounts. Section 4. Requirements for Conducting Annual Fiscal Reviews and Deficit Analyses The Account shall be used for the purpose of accounting IS annual reviews of the project's fiscal operation deficits, to be conducted by the City or its consultants to evaluate the fiscal impact of the project on the City. These annual reviews shall be similar in nature to those used in the project's adopted PFFP/FIA, using factors deemed relevant by the City manager. The reviews shall contain such information so as to enable the City to ensure that all City services provided to the project including direct and indirect costs, as well as capital and operating costs, are covered by project revenues and project exactions. The first annual review shall be for fiscal year 2001/2002, and annual reviews shall continue through fiscal year 2015/2016. The reviews shall be completed within 180 days of the end of each fiscal year. Section 5. Requirements for Mitigating Fiscal Deficits Identified by the Annual Reviews The applicant or their successors and assigns in-interest shall be responsible for paying the City for any fiscal deficits identified by the annual reviews through establishment of a permanent funding mechanism. Section 6. Expiration of This Ordinance This ordinance shall be of no further force and effect when the City Council determines that the accounts are no longer needed for the purposes stated herein. Section 7. Effective Date This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its second reading and adoption. 3 /.( ,6_...J ,() v' Presented by Approved as to form by Robert A. Leiter Director of Planning & Building CA.. ~~ John Kaheny City Attorney H :\shared\attorncy\san-mig\\amended3 fiscal ordinance.doc) 4 /6,<3- 'i Area Subject to Annual Fiscal Reviews I SOG&E MIGUEL SUB-STATION l ~ , . . iJ .. . - ~ ..; u u ~ BONITA lONG CANYON ~~ C HULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR PROJECT TRI MARK PACIFIC-SAN MIGUEL LLC. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C) APPLICANT: San Miauel Ranch: PROJECT Unincorporated County area adjacent Fiscal Impact Review Ordinance LOCATION: to the northerly boundary of Chula Vista. SCALE: FILE NUMBER: An ordinance establishing a Fiscal Impact Review Process NORTH No Scale I peM - 96-04 and Fund for the San Miguel Ranch Planned Community. C:\MyFiles\locators\PCM9604.cdr 11129100 t.6 , -? EXHIBIT 1 Fiscal Analysis handles the maintenance of city parks and provided park maintenance costs of$8.399 per public park acre. CIC allocated the park cost on a per acre (340 acres citywide and 12.-15 required acres for San Miguel Ranch) and recreation costs on a per housing unit basis. Annual park maintenance costs allocated to San Miguel Ranch are estimated at $ 104.568 at build-out ($8.399 * 12.45). Vista Mother Miguel does not include any park uses. However. park costs of$8.399 X .4 acres were applied because of the city's requircment for 3 acres of park per 1.000 population. Therefore, annual park maintenance engineering costs for Vista Mother Miguel are $3,400. Excluding the Women's Club, which is assumed to be self-supporting, costs for recreation services total $46 per housing unit. Using this multiplier, results in costs of$64,600 for the San Miguel Ranch (refer to Table A- 18) and $2,000 for Vista Mother Miguel (refer to Table B- 18). The following table details the cost allocation for Parks and Recreation. Parks Administration-Parks Administration-Open Space Maintenance General Marina Park Recreation Ath]etics Aquatics Senior Citizens General Administrati on- Recreati on Net Fiscal Impact 98/99 Budl!.et $3,127,684 374.260 334.552 2,4] 8.870 2,]47,445 27],425 $2,502,606 260,720 5]6,172 288,839 1,062.615 374.260 Cost Allocation Unit/Acre $8,399 per park acre Provided by lighting & landscape district Not applicable $46 per housing unit $5 per housing unit $ 1 0 per housing unit $5 per housing unit $20 per housing unit $7 per housing unit Utilizing the previously mentioned methodologies, estimated net fiscal impacts are presented in Tables 61 and 62. As previously mentioned, all values are in 1998 dollars. No annual adjustments to revenues or costs were utilized. The estimated annual flows of costs and revenues are primarily related to the estimated project absorption. Table 6 I presents the results of the fiscal impact associated with the San Miguel Ranch. Fisca] revenues range from $219,500 in the first year of development (2001) to $1,137.300 at build-out (2006). Fiscal expenditures range from $219,100 in year one to $1,262,400 at build-out. The net fiscal impact from developing the San Miguel Ranch is a positive $400 in year one and becomes a negative $125,100 at project build-out. It should be noted that during some years the net fiscal impact will be more or less due to infrequently needed street repairs. San Miguel Ranch Public Facilities Finance Plan 4.4.14 - 18 /6/3-10 ~XHI&'T Z' San Ivliguel Ranch consists of a typical mixed land-use plan including single family homes. multi-family homes. neighborhood shopping center. parks and school. The homes range from $140.000 for a multi-family unit to $400,000 for a single family home on a large lot. The median housing price and associated estimated household income for San Miguel Ranch are significantly higher than the overall city. The San Miguel Ranch is expected to generate higher than average per urnt property and sales taxes. Other revenues are expected to be at or above city averages. In terms of expenditures. this project is not expected to incur any unusual or higher than average costs for city services. The primary factor responsible for this project's negative fiscal impact is primarily due to the relatively small city share of property taxes under the existing annexation agreement with the County. Because the project is currently located in the County of San Diego and proposed to be annexed into the City of Chula Vista. the city's share of property tax is determined by the City/County Master Tax Agreement, which limits the city's share to 8.6 percent. For properties located within the City of Chula Vista. the average city share of property tax is roughly ]4.7 percent. ]fSan Miguel Ranch utilized a 14.7 percent share, the fiscal impact would be positive for all years presented in Table 61. The last year presented based on a ]4.7 percent share would be positive $98.200. Table 62 presents the results of the fiscal impact associated with Vista Mother Miguel. Fiscal revenues are $32,700 in year 2002 and remain the same throughout the presented development schedule, due to forecasted one-year absorption schedule. Fiscal expenditures are $34,700 in 2002 and increase to $35.000 at build-out. The increase in expenses is related to the infrequent street repair costs. The net fiscal impact from developing Vista Mother Miguel is a negative $2,000 for all presented years except the year 2006 ($2,300), which includes street maintenance costs. Similar to San Miguel Ranch, the median housing price and associated estimated household income for Vista Mother Miguel are significantly higher than the overall city. Vista Mother Miguel is expected to generate higher than average per unit property and sales taxes. Other revenues are expected to be at or above city averages. In terms of expenditures. this project is not expected to incur any unusual or higher than average costs for city services. This project is also proposed to be annexed into the city, which limits the city's share of property tax to 8.6 percent. For both the San Miguel Ranch project and the Vista Mother Miguel subdivision, the City and the developer will negotiate and establish a fee program to offset the projected fiscal deficits through a condition of approval of the SPA and/or tentative subdivision map. 4.4.]4 - ]9 /~c-7 . San j\figulll Ranch Public Facilities Finance Plan ~ , . Fiscal Analysis Table 61 NET FISCAL IMPACT OF THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH ON THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Revenue Sources Revenues (In Thousands) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Secured Property Tax $60.4 $131.4 $196.5 $262.3 $314.7 $314.7 Unsecured Property Tax $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $3.3 $3.3 Property Transfer Tax $5.5 $12.0 $17.9 $24.0 $27.9 $27.9 Sales & Use Tax $87.0 $188.5 $2656 $352.9 $451.1 $451.1 Franchise Tax $4.7 $10.2 $14.4 $19.1 $30.8 $30.8 TOT Tax $0.7 $1.5 $2.1 $2.7 $4.0 $4.0 Utility Tax $6.4 $13.8 $19.5 $25.9 $41.7 $41.7 Business License $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $6.3 $6.3 Miscellaneous Revenues $54.8 $118.8 $167.4 $222.4 $257.6 $257.6 TOTAL REVENUES $219.5 $476.1 $683.3 $909.3 $1,137.3 $1,137.3 Expenditure Sources Expenditures (In Thousands) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Government Admin. $39.8 $94.1 $137.2 $185.0 $225.6 $229.3 Planning $3.8 $8.3 $11.7 $15.6 $19.1 $19.1 Police $88.9 $192.6 $271.5 $360.7 $467.4 $467.2 Fire $36.2 $78.4 $110.5 $146.9 $180.] $180.1 Library $22.2 $48.0 $67.7 $89.9 $]03.0 $103.0 Public Works $14.2 $33.5 $48.7 $65.7 $77.6 $94.5 Park and Recreation $13.9 $62.9 $]08.0 $154.7 $] 69.2 $169.2 TOT AL EXPENDITURES $219.1 $518.0 $755.4 $1,018.4 $1,241.7 $1,262.4 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 TOTAL REVENUES $2] 9.5 $476.] $683.3 $909.3 $1.]37.3 $1.137.3 TOTAL EXPENDlTURES $219.1 $5]8.0 $755.4 $1,0]8.4 $1.241.7 $1,262.4 NET FISCAL IMPACT $0.4 ($41.9) ($72.0) ($109.1) ($104.3) ($125.1) San Miguel Ranch Public Facilities Finance Plan 4.4.14 - 20 /bb- ,f Table 62 NET FISCAL IMPACT OF VISTA MOTHER MIGUEL ON THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Reyenue Sources Revenues (In Thousands) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Secured Property Tax $0.0 $9.8 $9.8 $9.8 $9.8 $9.8 Unsecured Property Tax $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 SO.O SO.O Property Transfer Tax $0.0 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 Sales & Use Tax $0.0 $12.5 $12.5 $12.5 $12.5 $12.5 Franchise Tax $0.0 $0.7 $0.7 $0.7 $0.7 $0.7 TOT Tax $0.0 $0.1 $0.1 $0.1 $0.1 $01 Utility Tax $0.0 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 Business License $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Miscellaneous Revenues IQ&. $7.9 $7.9 .$l'L $7.9 $7.9 TOTAL REVENUES SO.O S32.7 $32.7 $32.7 $32.7 S32.7 Expenditure Sources Expenditures (In Thousands) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Government Admin. $0.0 $6.3 $6.3 $6.3 $6.3 $6.4 Planning $0.0 $0.6 $0.6 $0.6 $0.6 $0.6 Police $0.0 $]2.7 $12.7 $12.7 $12.7 $12.7 Fire $0.0 $5.2 S5.2 $5.2 $5.2 $5.2 Library $0.0 $3.2 $3.2 $3.2 $3.2 $3.2 Public Works $0.0 $1.4 $1.4 $1.4 $1.4 $1.7 Park and Recreation IQ&. $5.4 $5.4 $5.4 $5.4 S5.4 TOTAL EXPENDITURES SO.O S34.7 $34.7 $34.7 S34.7 S35.0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 TOTAL REVENUES SO.O $32.7 $32.7 $32.7 S32.7 $32.7 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0.0 $34.7 $34.7 $34.7 $34.7 $35.0 NET FISCAL IMPACT $0.0 (S2.0) (S2.0) (S2.0) ($2.0) (S2.3) 4.4.14-21 /bO-<j San Miguel Ranch Public Facilities Finance Plan 01/04/00 TeE 13:59 FAX 619 637 4040 C I C RESEARCH IfTI 002 ~ IIII RECEIVED JAN - 4 'lOOO CIC RESEARCH, INC. PLANNING Economic Research. Marketing Research. Environmental Research. Survey Hesearch January 4, 2000 Mr. Ed Batchelder City of Chula Vista 3115 Fourth Avenue, Suite R Chula Vista CA 91910 Re: San Miguel Ranch Fiscal Deficit Funding Alternatives Dear Ed: The purpose of this letter is to present potential funding alternatives for the identified San Miguel Ranch fiscal operating deficit. The fiscal analysis presents an estimated annual net fiscal impact over the proposed development period (2001 to 2005) and one year beyond, to account for some public works costs, which do not occur until after 5 years. The fiscal irnpact was slightly positive in the first year and negative in the 2nd through the 6th year. At build-out, the estimated annual fiscal impact was a negative $125,000 (current 1999 dollars). At the request of the City of Chula Vista, CIC developed two 'funding alternatives for the forecasted fiscal impact deficit. The included table presents the net fiscal impact for the presented development period and an additional 25 years beyond build-out. Although very unlikely, for the purpose of this analysis, CIC assumed the City of Chula Vista's public costs and revenues would adjust at the same rate over the subject period. From 2006 to 2030 the fiscal deficit is assumed to remain at an annual $125,000 (FY 99/00 dollars). CIC presented different time periods for which the developer could be responsible for the fiscal deficit. Also pn~sented in the table is the estimated annual number of housing units built and sold. This absorption period was utilized in CIC's fiscal report. The table presents two funding alternatives for 5 different time periods. Although the identified fiscal deficit could continue indefinitely, it is very difficulli to forecast future revenues and expenditures. The presented time periods range from a six year (consistent with the fiscal analysis) period to a 30-year period. The two funding alternatives include a one-time payment and a per-housing unit fee. The per-unit fee is to be paid at the same time as the building permit, based on the presented building schedule. Both methodologies utilize a discounted cash flow analysis (Net Present Value) of the annual deficit. In both alternatives a net present value was calculated utilizing a 3 percent 8361 Vickers Street. San Diego, California 92111~2112 Telephone (619) 637-4000. Fax: (619) 637-4040 ",6 'J ,>/ ".., .- /' i? I : eX/I/8/r 3 01/04/00 TrE 14:00 FAX 619 637 4040 C I C RESEARCH I4J 004 Proposed San Miguel Development Potential Funding Alternatives for Fiscal Operating Deficit Alternative Alternative Per Building Permit Fee One.time 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Time Period Payment (2001 (2002 (2003 (2004 (2005 for Estimates (FY99/00 dollars) dollars) dollars) dollars) dollars) dollars) 6 Year 2001 to 2006 $396,623 $293 $302 $311 $320 $330 10 Year 2001 to 2010 $785,905 $581 $598 $616 $635 $654 15 Year 2001 to 2015 $1,212,042 $896 $922 $950 $979 $1,008 25 Year 2001 to 2025 $1,836,993 $1,357 $1,398 $1,440 $1.483 $1,528 30 Year 2001 to 2030 $2,170,239 $1,604 $1,652 $1,701 $1,752 $1,805 1) Assumes 3% inflation and 6% interest (net discount rate of 3%) 2) Assumes the City of Chula Vista's public costs and revenues djust at the same rate over the subject period 3) The one. time payment fee is in FY 99/00 dollars, the per building permit 'fee is presented in 2001 to 2005 dollars. Number of Years Year Net Fiscal (OOOs) (FY99/00 dollars) Build.Out Schedule (units) 1 2001 $0.4 300 2 2002 ($41.9 350 3 2003 ($72.0 266 4 2004 ($109.1) 301 5 2005 ($104.3) 177 6 2006 ($125.1) 0 7 2007 ($125.1) 8 2008 ($125.1) 9 2009 ($125.1) 10 2010 ($125.1) 11 2011 ($125.1) 12 2012 ($125.1) 13 2013 ($125.1) 14 2014 ($125.1) 15 to 30 2015 to 2030 ($125.1) per year I Source: CIC Research. Inc. December 1999 ,r ._'---; ...f, /f?e ','_. 01/04/00 TeE 14:00 FAX 619 637 4040 C 1 C RESEARCH !g003 Mr. Batchelder January 4, 2000 Page 2 IIII discount rate, which assumes that the difference between inflation and interest rates is 3%' per year. The one-time payment-funding alternative ranges from $397,000 (assumes the developer is responsible for a 6-year period) to $2,170,000 (assumes the developer is responsible for a 30-year period). These one-time payments represent the net preslmt values (NPV) of the presented cash flows utilizing the 3% discount rate. The per-unit fee is based on the above net present values divided by the number of units proposed and increased three percent each year to adjust for inflation. This fee ranges from a low of $293 (2001 dollars for a 6-year period) to a high of $1,805 (2005 dollars for a 30-year period) per housing unit, based on the presented absorption schedule. Based on discussions with City of Chula Vista's department heads, a period to include 10 years beyond the build out represents an equitable time period for which the developer should be responsible for the fiscal deficit. This represents a 15-year ]period from 2001 to 2015. Utilizing the two presented funding alternatives results in a one time fee of $1.2 million or a per- building permit fee, which ranges from $896 in 2001 to $1,008 by 2005. Sincerely, 'fIaJ { U Mark Crooks Senior Market Analyst MCC:slf 1 The 3% discount rate was calculated using a 3% inflation rate and a 6% return on flJnds. ere Research, Inc. 8361 Vicko", Stn>ot . Son Diogo, California 92111.2112 Telephone (619) 637-4000 . Fax: (619) 537-4040 ,/'b e3 -// RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH REORGANIZATION (REF. NO. R099-42) INVOLVING THE ANNEXATION OF 742.94 ACRES TO THE CITY, THE DETATCHMENT OF 742.94 ACRES FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 135 (SAN DIEGO REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS), AND THE DETATCHMENT OF 1.03 ACRES FROM THE BONITA- SUNNYSIDE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO EXECUTION OF THE PROJECT'S REQUIRED MSCP ANNEXATION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on November 22, 1999, Trimark Pacific-San Miguel, LLC, filed an application by landowner petition with the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the approximately 742.94 acre San Miguel Ranch project area to the City of Chula Vista from the unincorporated area of the County, to detach same from County Service Area (CSA) No. 135; and WHEREAS, a Certificate of Filing was issued by LAFCO on March 3, 2000; and WHEREAS, LAFCO modified the reorganization to include detachment of 1.03 acres from the Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, the 742.94 acre area is generally bounded by Proctor Valley Road to the west and south, Mother Miguel Mountain and the SDG&E Miguel Substation tq the north, and the Rolling Hills Ranch project area and Otay Water District property to the east, and is more specifically described by the legal meets-and-bounds description and plat map attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, on December 17, 1996 the City Council originally prezoned the property "PC-Planned Community" through approval of the San Miguel Ranch General Development Plan; and WHEREAS, on October 19, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution 19631 approving the San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the reorganization is to facilitate development of the San Miguel Ranch project through the provision ofa full range of necessary municipal services by the City of Chula Vista; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2000, LAFCO duly considered and approved the reorganization subject to the following conditions: I ! I 1 I:C _, a. Pursuant to conditions regarding a forecasted annual fiscal deficit, contained in the SPA Plan and Tentative Map, the property owner will establish and fund a mitigating mechanism to the City's satisfaction. b. Pursuant to requirements of the County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) regarding the annexation ofland, the County, City ofChula Vista, the United States United States Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game and the property owner shall execute an agreement in accordance with the requirements of the MSCP, prior to recordation of the certificate of completion for the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization", and WHEREAS, LAFCO's approval designated the City of Chula Vista as the conducting authority, and authorized the City to conduct proceedings in compliance with LAFCO's resolution without notice and hearing; and WHEREAS, the regular San Diego County assessment roll is used; and WHEREAS, the reorganization area is uninhabited; and WHEREAS, the reorganization area will not be subject to bonded indebtedness; and WHEREAS, a Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR-97-02) for the San Miguel Ranch project and annexation was certified by the City Council on October 19, 1999, by Resolution No. 19630 along with attendant Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and WHEREAS, LAFCO certified that it reviewed and considered the information in FSEIR-97-02, the Findings of Fact and the Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the City Council on October 19, 1999; and WHEREAS, the City conducted reorganization proceedings in accordance with Government Code Sections 57000, et seq.; and WHEREAS, the Chula Vista City Council duly considered the reorganization on December 12,2000, in accordance with LAFCO Resolution R099-42 and Government Code Sections 57000, et seq.; and WHEREAS, the Chula Vista city Council approved the MSCP Annexation Agreement by Resolution No. 2000-_, on December 19,2000. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows: 2 J/ /7 ) /lbG'~ I. That the City Council does hereby find that FSEIR-97-02 and the attendant Finding of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for this Project have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the CEQA and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City ofChula Vista. 2. That the City Council orders the following actions for the San Miguel Ranch Reorganization with the boundaries described in Exhibit A, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. a. Annexation of742.94 acres to the City ofChula Vista. b. Detachment of742.94 acres from County Service Area No. 135 (San Diego Regional Communications). c. Detachment of 1.03 acres from the Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District. 3. That the City Council does hereby find that the City has, through separate action, established a mechanism with the property owner regarding mitigation of the project's forecasted annual fiscal deficit. 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file certified copies of this resolution ordering the reorganization with the Executive Officer ofLAFCO, subject to the terms of the MSCP Annexation Agreement. 5. That, pursuant to the condition of approval under Item 3.b of LAFCO Resolution R099-42, the Executive Officer of LAFCO will not issue a certificate of completion for the purposes of finalization and recordation of the reorganization until the MSCP Annexation Agreement has become effective pursuant to the terms of said Agreement. Presented by Approved as to form by C\~~ ~kJ John M. Kaheny City Attorney Robert A. Leiter Director of Planning & Building (H\sharcd\attorney\san-mig\council annexation resolution.doc) 3 /?;C--:3 . ~---- R099-42 "SAN MIGUEL RANCH REORGANIZATION" A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 22 AND 27, AND FRACTIONAL SECTIONS 21 AND 28 IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL 'PLAT THEREOF, TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF QUARTER SECTIONS 6 AND 7 OF RANCHO DE LA NACION ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 166, MADE BY MORRILL ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST GORNER OF SECTION 26 OF SAID TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST BEING A POINT IN THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE .OT A Y WATER DISTRICT GOLF COURSE REORqANIZATlON" ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF SAN DIEGO ON JULY 121999, SAID POINT BEING IN THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED TO TRIMARK PACIFIC - SAN MIGUEL LLC, (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS .TRIMARK LAND"), FILED IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ON SEPTEMBER 10,1997 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1997-0439631 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; 1. THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 26 BEING THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PER SAID ANNEXATION AND SAID 'TRIMARK LAND" SOUTH 00024'57" WEST, 1319.72 FEET (RECORD SOUTH 00026'19" WEST, 1318.19 FEET PER SAID ANNEXATION) TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 27 BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF THE .SAL T CREEK RANCH REORGANIZA TlONO ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 16630 APPROVED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 19, 1992; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY OF THE .SAL T CREEK RANCH REORGANIZATION" BEING COMMON WITH THE BOUNDARY OF SAID 'TRIMARK LAND. THE FOLLOWING 4 COURSES: 2. NORTH 89055'19" WEST, 1330.78 FEET (RECORD NORTH 88058'41" WEST, 1328.74 FEET PER SAID ANNEXATION) ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; Approved by!l1e].<<a' AgenfY FormotJon CornmiSS!9/l a/ SIn Dieao ...'...... :DV M:\Legals\2091\02\02A01.doc WO 2091-2 1/12100 Page 1 of 7 (,,€cYt:'-l:=C;; j , APR 3 2000 1I11~/.1 tll/ I" " '., EXHIBIT A /iP'-"7 3. THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF TrlE NORTrlE.';ST QUARTER SOUTH 00012'38" WEST (RECORD SOUTH 00026'24" WEST PER SAID ANNEXATION), 1297.55 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 27; 4. THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE , , SOUTHEAST QUARTER SOUTH 00012'2S" WEST (RECORD SOUTH 0002S'24" WEST' PER SAID ANNEXATION), 1317.93 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTIER OF SAID SECTION 27; 5. THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER NORTH 88053'05" WEST (RECORD NORTH 88053'12" WEST PER SAID ANNEXATION), SOS.OO FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY TERMINUS OF COURSE NO. 20a OF THE oEASllAKE 1 ANNEXATlONO TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 11339 APPROVED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 1S, 1983, SAID POINT BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF SAID oTRIMARK PROPERTY"; THENCE ALONG THE COMMON BOUNDARY OF SAID "EASllAKE 1 ANNEXA TlONO AND SAID oTRIMARK LANDO THE FOLLOWING 4 COURSES: 6. NORTH 47"57'14" WEST, 443.84 FEET (RECORD NORTH 49007'44" WEST, 436.15 FEET PER SAID ANNEXATION); 7. THENCE NORTH 67"43'OS" WEST, 416.S0 FEET (RECORD NORTH 67044'00" WEST PER SAID ANNEXATION) TO A POINT IN THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 27; . 8. THENCE ALONG SAID CENTER LINE NORTH OOOOO'OS" WEST (RECORD NORTH 00001'00" WEST PER SAID ANNEXATION), 874.80 FEET TO THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 27; 9. THENCE ALON.G THE EAST AND WEST CEN1ER LINE OF SAID SECTION 27 NORTH S8057'54" WEST (RECORD NORTH S9059'00" WEST PER SAID ANNEXATION), 2733.45 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY OF THE oEASTLAKE 1 ANNEXATION" ALONG SAID BOUNDARY OF THE "TRIMARK LANDO THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES: 10. NORTH 01026'13" EAST, 1230.73 FEET ALONG SAID WESTlERL Y LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HALEY'S ADDITION, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF :DV M:\Legals\2091\C2\02A01.doc we 2091-2 1/12/00 Page 2 of 7 .!, ~ /1"" ~ /1.?0' ~ NO. 1285 FILED IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ON SEPTEMBER 22,1910; 11. THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID HALEY'S ADDIllON SOUTrl 89059'21" WEST, 1332.80 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF; 12. THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID HALEY'S ADDIllON SOUTH 01"19'50. WEST, 681.02 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE . CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 480.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 17009'03" WEST TO SAID POINT; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY OF THE "TRIMARK LAND. THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES: 13. SOUTIiWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17"40'30", 148.07 FEET; 14. THENCE SOUTH 55010'27" WEST, 120.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET; 15. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00"38'59", 4.76 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID BOUNDARY OF THE "TRIMARK LAND. BEING COMMON WITH THE BOUNDARY OF THAT LAND CONDEMNED TO SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY PER FINAL DECREE OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED JULY 3, 1963 AS FILElPAGE NO. 96521 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AS SHOWN AND DEUNEATED ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752 RLED IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ON JULY 9,1981; THENCE ALONG SAID COMMON BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING 2 COURSES: 16. NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 00018'38" EAST (RECORD NORTH 00018'59" EAST PER SAID ROS 8752),338.24 FEET; 17. THENCE NORTH 49"29'52" WEST, 279.94 FEET (RECORD NORTH 49"28'21" WEST, 280.00 FEET PER SAID ROS 8752); 18. THENCE ALONG SAID COMMON BOUNDARY AND THEN CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF SOUTH 40"31'08" WEST (RECORD SOUTH 40031'39" WEST PER SAID ROS 8752), 1132.33 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 10.00 FEET SOUTHERLY, MEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE, FROM THE SOUTHERLY SIDELINE OF PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD AS SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 8752; 19. THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 74056'48" WEST (RECORD SOUTH 74059'00" WEST PER SAID ROS 8752),194.40 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A . , , CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 480.00 FEET; 20. THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37"37'14", 315.17 FEET; 21. THENCE NORTH 67025'58" WEST, 656.46 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 2030.00 FEET; 22. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29054'22", 1059.58 FEET; 23. THENCE NORTH 37"31 '36" WEST, 242.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1030.00 FEET; 24. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19037'04", 352.67 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE TI-IA T IS PARALLEL WITH AND 30.00 FEET WESTERLY, MEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE, FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID RANCHO DE LA NACION; 25. THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 17"54'32" WEST, 1730.78 FEET TO A POINTTI-lATBEARS SOUTH 72005'28" WEST, 30.00 FEET, MEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE FROM SAID EASTERLY LINE OF RANCHO DE LA NACION, FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 20 OF SAID TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST; 26. THENCE NORTH 72005'28" EAST, 30.00 FEET TO SAID MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SECTION 20 BEING IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF RANCHO DE LA NACION AND BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID "TRIMARK LAND" AND IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST' QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 21; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID "TRIMARK LAND' THE FOLLOWING 10 COURSES: 27. NORTH 00008'56" EAST, 713.03 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; 28. THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF SOUTH 89049'23" EAST, 2650.04 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF; ~ :0\1 M:\I..egalsI2091\02\02A01.doc WO 2091-2 1112/00 Page 4 of 7 /;; C > 7 29. THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOU1l-!WEST QUARTER NORTH 00006'46" EAST, 1319.16 FEET TO THE NORTrlWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 21; 30. THENCE SOUTH S0037'13" EAST, 2090.S9 FEET; , , 31. THENCE SOUTH 72003'S7" EAST, S75.S3 FEET; 32. THENCE SOUTH 4s000'07" EAST, 691.99 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22; 33. THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF SOUTH 00011 '11" EAST, 330.99 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; 34. THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF NORTH 89008'31" EAST, 667.67 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; 3S. THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22 SOUTH 00002'SO" WEST, 330.74 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22; 36. THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 89007'41" EAST, 123.78 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 628.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 62025'23" EAST TO SAID POINT; 37. THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND SAID BOUNDARY OF THE "TRIMARK LAND" ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5017'37,58.02 FEET; 38. THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 75001'27" EAST, 191.21 FEETTO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SOuTHwEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22 BEING A POINT IN SAID BOUNDARY OF THE "TRIMARK LAND"; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING 4 COURSES: 39. NORTH 89007'41" EAST, 332.97 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22; :DV M:lLegals\2091\1J2\ll2A01.doc we 2091-2 1/12100 Page 5 of 7 ,t . /?c-p 4Q. THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER NORTH 00019'59" EAST, 661.04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 200 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT CONDEMNED TO SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY IN EXHIBIT B OF FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED FEBRUARY 6,1987 AS FILElPAGE NO. 87-068825 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; 41. T1HENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE SOUTH 86056'23" EAST, 4028.37 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 22 AND SAID WlESTERL Y BOUNDARY OF THE "OTAY WATER DISTRICT GOLF COURSE REORGANIZATION"; 42. T1HENCE ALONG SAID WlESTERL Y BOUNDARY SOUTH 02024'47" WIEST (RECORD SOUTH 02024'36" WIEST PER SAID ANNEXATION), 385.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 742.94 ACRES MORE OR LESS. Page 6 of 7 :DV M:lLegals\20911C2102A01.doc WO 2091-2 1/12100 Ii # // {/I _..:? ,.it'->- I R099-42 SAN MIGUEL RA.1\!CH REORGANIZATION DETACHMENT FROM BONITA- SUNNYSIDE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ALL THAT PORTION OF QUARTER SECTION 6 OF RANCHO DE LA NACION, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP TIIEREOF NO. 166, MADE BY MORRILL, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 11, 1869, LYING WIT1IIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED BOUNDARIES: B-EGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID QUARTER SECTION 6; 1. THENCE SOUTH 72005'28" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID QUARTER SECTION 6 TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITII AND 30.00 FEET WESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID RANCHO DE LA NACION; 2. THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 17054'32" WEST TO A POINT THAT BEARS SOUTH 72005'28" WEST, 30.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM SAID EASTERLY LINE OF RANCHO DE LA NACION, FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN; 3. THENCE NORTH 72005'28" EAST, 30.00 FEET TO SAID MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SECTION 20, BEING A POINT IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF RANCHO DE LA NACION; 4. THENCE SOUTH 17054'32" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 7 of 7 !i ~ ,.,/:;'c, - -'<~) eNZi(CCTeb /..f?GJL. bf?S~/ .?T/IM/ "SAN MIGUEL RANCH REORGANIZATION" I I I I \0: . <C<c :<'- <caj c_ o"" c- <: " 0 ~ . - w -' < u '" N I I I I I I I I I I NUMBER BEARING DISTANCE IUBER DELTA LEJCTH RAD I US 14 N S5"10'2r E /20.00' 1.1 17"40'30" 148.07' 480,00' 16 N WI8'J8" E 338.24' 15 oo.J8'59'" 4.76' 420.00' 17 N 49"29'52" W 279.94' 20 .17"31' 74" .115.17' 480.00' 26 N 72"05'28" E .10.00' 22 29"54'22" 1059.58' 2OJO.OO' 24 19".17'04" 352.67' 10J0.OO' N 89"-49'2.1" W 2650.04 N 00"08'56" E 713.0.1' "" N l70.1'5r W 575.53' N 45'OO'Or W 691.99' N 00"11'11" W -----------TU~~M------~~'~I~- SBM I I I N 89"59'21" E I 1.J.J2.80' z "J:l ':!> :z:. o 'I o ~'Cl ':!>m -U -'- 'r en':!> <:n N .1T31 '36" W 242.48' N 01"Z9'50" E 681.02' MAP i2BB t'..\J ",IV ,N lTog'O.1" W (Ii) y c,.TJ 14 '-"- - - - 10 /: 34"10'34" W (R) N ..... w 1.1.1 Vl w w en :z:. ':!> o o :z:. EASTERLY UNE RANCO OE LA HAC/ON Approved by the LOCllI Alent)' Formation Commission 01 San DIIllD )\ ./ ..... ~Q~ V-~<O;; ~""~~ ~~~~ '" \ ! N>R 3 2000 I~tff i<: 11 SHEET1OF2 Rle Nome." R:\OIJ5\4:Al4P\EX Ph 1 J./'lna' SlIt 1 of 2.dwg (~5J/1.G~p) h C. -1/ (!IJR!?Ff'.TE/') / FAA.! I A jf D Page 1 of 3 "SAN MIGUEL RANCH REORGANIZATION" "- '" " ~ '" . '" <ti - ... '" ~ . n :o:i ~ . "--J ~ ..:. ."" :">0 ;1:/ ;!: '" "-C> '" - .. . 0, 'Q;)", ~~ _"'I "- '" ."< '" 1111 ~ <l~ "- '" "=) _ _ 21122 2427 ...-... ~.... I .'" Q:: ""'" oc::i. . 01 ~ !l1~ ~ ~I -e'\f l- I ~~ ~ ~ ~~ w I t::l _ ~ ~ w '" - 0, :r: I :c: t...,~' Q;) en ~ ~ =<= w ;:: "" l7J '" ""' 0, . '" ~~ '" "'<::i "'..., -"< "'- '" /' 1 I 1 I I EAST LAKE 1 I ANNEXATION DATE: I-I.if-be> DRAg BY:./I. !<:H~JltJ!!. N 8055'23" W 4028.3T N 00"19'59" F: 551.04' 717S, R1W S3M N 88"5T54" W 2733.45 ;!: N 00"00'08" W 874.80' ;!: = A;:;:roved by ll1e Locel Commission 01 , APR 3 000 KJU>PING DIVISION SAN DIEGO COll!lTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. SAN MIGUEL RANCH REORGANIZATION I ANNEXATION TO CITY OF CHULA VISTA: AND DETACHMENT FROM COUNTY . SERVICE AREA NO. 135 -~ File Name: R:\OT.J5\_\Er PO T....... Sh/2 of 2-d.. C~YIS6)) /Gc -/...l, N 02"24'47" [ 385.28' N 89"55'19" W 1330.78. '" . . "'''' ...., '" "''' ~~ "'- '" I I &, -S~I . ~~Q I ~4;#~~~ I ~. I G ~Q~ I ~">i~4; I LAFCO: /(0 ".51. 2- AREA: 7""<...9~ /k:' PG. NO: I-I! B/L: S8$' 15~ THons BROS: lail I "'" ""<z I 00 C-'_ E-< E-<< UN -- I ~Z E-<< [/JC-' -p:; &::10 ~~ ~~ 23 E-<~ <[/J 25 ~p:; ... >-;::l . <0 ..~~ E-<U ....0; 0 "'- ",..., "'- '" b o o ~ w -' <. u en I, 1f::::1 I , i I i Sl-EET 2 OF 2 Page 2 of 3 , """'..> '<". - ~;:;~"'" ~ Ii' 6'" ~, pl-f""!' c . 7j-~11 ' #r.'Z,p, ~;,? POR 1/4 SEe 6 ~ '" ~ ... '" "!. " RANCHO DE LA NACION MAP 166 ?O <.. , -.:. \ ~ ~~ APR 32000 ...0 ~\ Cy ~\ ~\ -G.\ ?\ ~\ ~\ , Ap~TllY8d b1 the Local AIeMy I'ormatiOh Comml~ DIllon DiltIlD DATE: /-/4-,00 SCALE: 1'= 4-00' MAPPING DIVISION SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR I S OFFICE LAFCO: 7?0~ 3--12 AREA: I.- 03 At::. ~ PG. NO: /8 B/L: 5jk)-2S~-D51't>e !mOMAS BROS: 13/{ .TRA .PAGE: VoB/IIC" TRA: <080/.5 : DRAWN BY:;1I.!GC#CJ"e,e SAN MIGUEL RA."<CH REORGANIZATION DETACHMENT FROM BONITA-SUNNYSIDE FIRE PROTECI10N DISTRICI' ~{)PJ:'P",,-r-~^ I P.c...AJ IAA'"/'\ T">___..... RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC, REGARDING THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGICAL MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SAN MIGUEL RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP WHEREAS, the Indemnification Agreement is an agreement between the City and the developer, NNP-Trimark San Miguel, LLC, and serves to protect the City in the event a claim or legal proceeding is instituted as a result of, or related to the City entering into the Annexation Agreement; and WHEREAS, the indemnification provides for the developer to defend and indemnify the city from and against all liability, damages, costs and loss relating to, arising from, or in connection with the city's processing and/or approval of the Annexation Agreement (including the granting of "take authorization"); and WHEREAS, in addition, the developer has agreed to provide security to ensure the implementation of this indemnification agreement in the event that any claim, action or proceeding is filed against the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve an Indemnification Agreement between the City and NNP-Trimark San Miguel LLC, regarding the Annexation Agreement concerning the Conservation and Biological Mitigation Program for the Implementation of the San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area Plan and Tentative Tract Map, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Chula vista. Approved as to form by a Robert Leiter Joh Director of Planning and Building G' y Attorney [H:\sharedIATTORNEY\san-mig\indemnification agreement reso (December 13, 2000 (4:10pm)] Presented by .. :J DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC REGARDING THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGICAL MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN MIGUEL RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 2000, by and between the City of Chula vista (city), a municipal chartered corporation of the State of California, and NNP-TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL, LLC, a Limited Liability Company (Applicant). WHEREAS, Applicant has requested that City approve the Annexation Agreement Concerning the Conservation and Biological Mitigation Program for the Implementation of San Miguel Ranch Sectional Planning Area Plan and Tentative Tract Map (Annexation Agreement). The project is located on approximately 738 acres on the northern border of the city of Chula vista in the County of San Diego and is known as the San Miguel Ranch (Project); and WHEREAS, in consideration of Applicant's request for city to approve the Annexation Agreement, Applicant desires to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless city, its elected and appointed officers, agents and employees from and against all liability, damages, costs, expenses (including attorneys' fees), and loss relating to, arising from, or in connection with, the city's processing and/or approval of the Annexation Agreement, and to provide security to ensure the implementation of this Agreement in the event any claim, action or proceeding is brought challenging city's approval of the Annexation Agreement; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for Applicant to defend and indemnify the city, its elected and appointed officers, agents and employees from all liability, damages, costs, expenses (including but not limited to attorneys' fees, costs and expenses), and loss relating to, arising from, or in connection with, City's approval of the Annexation Agreement, and to provide security to ensure the implementation of this obligation. 1 /~D'.z NOW, THEREFORE, City and Applicant agree as follows: 1. Applicant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless city, its elected and appointed officers, and employees from and against all actions, suits, claims, damages, losses, judgments, liabilities, expenses, and other costs, including but not limited to litigation costs and attorney's fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the Annexation Agreement, including but not limited to, the City's acts or omissions with regard to compliance with CEQA or other laws, including but not limited to the Federal Endangered Species Act, (16 U.S.C. section 1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (California Fish and Game Code section 2050 et seq.) and the Natural Communities Conservation Planning Program (California Fish and Game Code Section 2800 et seq.), with regard to the preparation and processing of the Annexation Agreement and/or with regard to any decision concerning the Annexation Agreement and/or the granting of take authorization. Applicant's obligation to defend and indemnify the city includes any suit or challenge by any third party against the City regarding the Annexation Agreement which contests the legality or adequacy of the City's processing and/or approval of the Annexation Agreement, and/or the City's compliance with the requirements of CEQA or other laws, including but not limited to the Federal Endangered Species Act, (16 U. S. C. section 1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (California Fish and Game Code Section 2050 et seq.) and the Natural Communities Conservation Planning Program (California Fish and Game Code section 2800 et seq.) Applicant's obligations under this Agreement shall apply whether or not there is concurrent, active, or passive negligence on the part of the City, its agents, officers, or employees. 2. At its sole discretion, city shall have the right but not the obligation to participate at its own expense in the defense or settlement of any suit or challenge, but such participation shall not relieve the Applicant of any obligation imposed by this Agreement. Should Applicant fail to defend and indemnify City against litigation regarding the Annexation Agreement and/or to perform any obligation imposed under this Agreement, city may discontinue the defense of any such litigation. 3. Applicant's obligations to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the city, its elected and appointed officers, agents and employees shall include, but not be limited to: 2 1/1\.,) i~V ~) A. the costs of any judgments or awards against the City for damages, losses, litigation costs, and/or attorneys' fees arising out of, or in any regard connected with, a suit or challenge regarding the Annexation Agreement, including but not limited to, contesting City's processing and/or approval of the project, and/or the adequacy of the CEQA reports and documentation and/or city's compliance with CEQA or other laws, including but not limited to the Federal Endangered Species Act, (16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (California Fish and Game Code section 2050 et seq.) and the Natural Communities Conservation Planning Program (California Fish and Game Code Section 2800 et seq.); and B. the costs of any settlement for damages, litigation costs, and attorneys' fees to be paid to other parties arising out of, or in any regard connected with, the Annexation Agreement including but not limited to, a suit or challenge contesting City's processing and/or approval of the project, and/or the adequacy of the CEQA reports and documentation and/or the city's compliance with CEQA or other laws, including but not limited to the Federal Endangered Species Act, (16 U. S. C. Section 1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (California Fish and Game Code Section 2050 et seq.) and the Natural Communities Conservation Planning Program (California Fish and Game Code Section 2800 et seq.) 4. All parties to this Agreement, or persons hired by any party to this Agreement, shall proceed in good faith and with reasonable diligence to achieve a settlement or other disposition of any claim, proceeding or action which will minimize, to the extent reasonably practicable, Applicant's costs to defend and indemnify City under this Agreement. The parties shall consult with one another and give due consideration to the other party's views prior to any such settlement or final disposition. 5. Applicant's obligations to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the city, its elected and appointed officers, agents and employees under this Agreement shall be effective regardless of whether any or all Annexation Agreement approvals and/or actions by the city regarding the Annexation Agreement remain valid or are invalidated by any court. 3 frob ~/ 6. In the event that a claim, action, or proceeding is filed against the City regarding the Annexation Agreement, City shall promptly notify Applicant in writing and cooperate fully in the defense. Upon receipt of such notification, Applicant shall assume the defense of the claim, action, or proceeding, including the employment of counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City and Applicant, and the prompt payment of the fees and disbursements of such counsel. If City reasonably determines that having common counsel would present such counsel with a conflict of interest, or if Applicant fails to promptly assume the defense of the claim, action, or proceeding or to promptly employ counsel reasonably satisfactory to City, then City may employ separate counsel to represent or defend city against such claim, action, or proceeding, and Applicant shall pay the reasonable fees and disbursements of such counsel within 30 days of receiving an itemized billing therefor. 7. Applicant shall provide security in the amount of $500,000.00. Applicant shall provide security in the amount of $350,000.00 by December 22, 2000. The $350,000.00 in security shall be provided as follows: $250,000.00 in the form of an Irrevocable Letter of Credit callable by the City at their unfettered discretion by submitting to the bank a letter, signed by the city Manager, stating that a claim, action or proceeding has been filed against the city and the Letter of Credit shall by issued by a bank and in a form satisfactory to the City; and $100,000 in the form of a bond which is issued by a surety and in a form satisfactory to the City. Applicant shall provide the remaining $150,000 in security within 10 days of the filing of any claim, action or proceeding against the city arising out of, resulting from, or regarding the Annexation Agreement. The purpose of the security is to insure the performance of Applicant's obligations under this Agreement to defend, protect, indemnify and hold the City harmless; however, Applicant's obligations under this Agreement are not limited to or by the amount of said security. 8. Applicant shall maintain the security in the amounts as set out in Paragraph 7 above at all times after said security is provided to City until development has been completed and the Applicant has fulfilled its obligations under this Agreement. However, Applicant may periodically request the city to review the status and potential for a claim, action or proceeding being filed and request City to consider reduction in the amount of security to be maintained. Approval or denial of any said reduction in the amount of security to be maintained shall be within the City's sole 4 /bj).:;- discretion. 9. The Annexation Agreement approvals and any rights granted by city thereunder, including the take authorizations shall be subject to further review if the Applicant fails to provide the security as specified above, or if Applicant defaults under the obligations of this Agreement. If Applicant fails to provide security, or defaults under the obligations of this Agreement, city shall place the matter on the agenda of the City Council, at which time the city Council, in its sole discretion, may reconsider all Annexation Agreement approvals and may rescind any or all approvals and/or determine not to defend against the claim, action or proceeding made by any third party. 10. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that City may withhold any permit or approval if Applicant defaults under or fails to comply with any provisions of this Agreement or Applicant's Agreement with the County of San Diego involving indemnification regarding the Annexation Agreement. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that City will not be liable to Applicant for failure to issue permits or grant approvals pursuant to this provision. 11. Failure to defend and indemnify and/or provide the security as required in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver by Applicant of any right to proceed with the take authorizations and the grading permits issued by the city or any portion of the project until the City Council has completed the reconsideration process described in paragraph 9. 12. The obligations of this Agreement shall be binding on the parties and all successors and assigns of the real property which is the subject of the Annexation Agreement, and Applicant shall so obligate all transferees and assigns. 13. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect in any respect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement. 14. All notices required or allowed under this Agreement shall be deemed valid and effective five calendar days following deposit in the united States mail by certified and/or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following: 5 /6v-;; Applicant: NNP - TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC 85 Argonaut suite 205 Aliso viejo, CA 92656 Attention: Stephen Hester City: Director of Planning and Building City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula vista, CA 91910 15. Each party executing this Agreement represents and warrants that it has been duly authorized to enter into this Agreement, and has full and complete authority to do so. Each party expressly waives any defense to this Agreement based on any lack of authority to enter into and be bound by the terms of this Agreement. 16. Each party executing this has carefully read this Agreement, freely and voluntarily signed it. Agreement represents that it knows its contents, and has 17. Each of the parties, by the execution of this Agreement, represents that it has reviewed each term of this Agreement with its legal counsel and further agrees that it shall not deny the validity of the Agreement on the grounds that it did not have advice of counsel. 18. This Agreement and the related security, constitute the complete understanding of the parties with respect to the matters set forth herein. Neither party is relying on any other representation, oral or written. This Agreement may not be changed except by a written amendment signed by both parties. (NEXT PAGE IS SIGNATURE PAGE) 6 ItD- 7 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement on the date specified above. CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPLICANT NNP- TRIMARK SAN MIGUEL RANCH, LLC, a limited liability company By: Shirley Horton, Mayor By: Its: TPH, LLC Managing Member ATTEST: By: Its: Trimark Ventures, Managing Member Inc. By: Susan Bigelow city Clerk BY: Approved as to form: Stephen E. Hester Its: Vice President Approved as to form: By: John M. Kaheny City Attorney Andrew Hartzell Attorney for Applicant H:\Home\Attorney\Agree\SMR.lndemn.doc 7 j, /'\.? I ftp!./ <, ~{i GiiiiI!I3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! r We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation pl~n. · SR 125 will signifl'cantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will sh9rten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Driye time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa redu~d by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned re~pectflllly request that you use the influence as an elected officehotder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. SIGNATURE ~&~C4J>1 '-~ f!~ ~ :~€)JllG6.(0V"l11?"'LC;"'d~ , 117? 'x .r;6-.. NAME ADDRESS E.MAll /'ItA-'"{l GA>",lJ:- /-tLU. m 6,',ard _ ~ttsis:; _ Rc6 tt-r(;1;;4/pO 1 ~~;;~ /'./~~O~ ~~~~ , 'h:r:Aij,;~ L---iA \1\ \'VI R~ tit Y' ~ sk~ M,,150,) ~ . . f1;// R-f' ^,t!;2-; ;p.f z. 1f J. 2 (!JrVl fxiJi (our t '1/9-7 7 >>~- hL 't f ~h14 tJ :Z. ~cY-'::.-- {do 0::rCl/> ,/ For more informatIon and petitions contact: '-mzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.::om 11 r TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. i , \ G C fft. Il.../'J CIS "-.0 - S, # Z-;':Wi' /~, ;roscrfl)J'{) (QV1~? - J ~ C' l~,,\A; e ~~':7.: <-~(~\\fD yt~C1;J~ I ~;I'~9j ~~~ . ~ , _ ~E#.Arff\ ()'fl ~~~~ \~t' q~ ----- ------- ~. - ~~~{ ':)--" ;~L_ -'> 17 7 - ,J CIS C C> -( 7 ~ \ {{ fl..F )~Il v '----/ -/1 ~;t If~ ' 91< ''V7W"~ """<~ ~ (OW) q;C(~ 'v II-rJ For more Il1tofl'llatiol1 and petitions contact: Citileng for 125 ~ Bonita, CA 9190'2, (619) 412.7447, or e-mail www.dtilensfor125.com I'~',~~ 7)( tl ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS t 1 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! z- We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL ADDRESS ~ ~< 1 KC\y. /to/ d f~L1- ~ :J)'Clffi (0'1- '- c!JJ~ Y &1 Il;Ac, ~ffif'~-k\W~- ~ '-.;}(o.' ~CO 8 M ~f~ t; J S/ctP iii~/ f. J:Joln-RS Y.4--1" /:c..J , 5ct( Y0v;>,'f-, c '- j cY:::irJ~r(;1'/'J70 -4Ltrl rJJ ;)'211-/ - /Mn]{./-n) /[../ For more information ilnd petitions contact: Citizens for 125 ~o!lita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail ww\v,dtizensfor125_com z.~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~. ", c NAME ADDRESS E._MAli .:::: 12.00;;; . '10/0 \\ 1~ ('11 D ~tt1" f'1 ' l-1ltJrll}f2I) -' ~ <Jif!t)f.JlJ)j)/! z:.f)N1.:'<!!/J.rA -IV I U~i KJ1d, c/,e! ~ E'rLc If)!) 11 & !:(./! ~ -T"t-l, ,P", C-'{.)O~ '\)o " II ':c\-\ I(J v ,~ ~ ,II'(I \ - "l1' ~hu,1.A':~" 1 '5 c:--,...<:. . ) - ,/(\ . I .L '--~. \ ~- '" - .~ . ," ~ " L 1''J~~ )JJfp.,_ " lqlD fl /;,- ~~i" _ C' f1rn ~ftJ0 / ?~{,I\ .)....'/ ,_ I \ 1. ,.\c'1 ! '-: ; I , i ' j For more InTOrmatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com r ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS << REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME _ ADDRESS ~u .- _ c'\e;Yl~(..- I l5f;j!;{f/tI!t%C/j( ~ ~~\\.~' V(!A, A ; ~~~ - , 01/11 d !~ a J1)k f') l(,t....\(~CL- G~rc q ..-; , T< OGh; lA, F_MAII --/-L!llk , '~;' ~<t:' ~A , ! / ,- /J7lvltcnt1. V4", hr",;, - ~~~. , ;~';:~,S,::\ : c:;;:,# J t1.nJi?-- C't!/! t7 5 J ~'---- t!".ec~""r- I LC \ ri'. In ('n'7I'f ' , /} -l:"p 1'~' -,\ '\w-<Y'-, ~,.-__ C lorn-- II '{1 :.} '(~;J ~ "U ,- 9t-c'd0 c77(!; I 1.// / MC\vJ 017lh(Y ~'~:-f'S i *,cJA"" For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125' --' Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e--mail www.dtizensfor125.com .1 yz! (~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY, REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME .6.nnD't'CC SIGNATURE ! 0;, 91/ ~/ S lCt,3 "- ," > ., f-~J '..... I 1\J'y) ,S I. f ~l \f\D( ,!if) t 2 yZ,:/ H I 2 ~~, th'1bJ",)S ""'tC\D"'0'~. .L..2 <::.'.... f~:~ ,^^:.'.'. 0" \J VV'lJ" ~, " 31913 ~/f!zvlA-)li~~~ . -, - - P/7/S N 00 ,"-, e For more information and petitions'fr,ntact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91909., (619) 472-7441, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com / / !/Jt1RMu2~ ~.:tt\(J !".'\ ~.._, &LP~\ - ,.31:> / t, :11:" 'I;; \ ,1,__, '2_ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS F_MAII SIGNATURE I .:::I off r> .S'VVI I ., f ~ t o 3 / ,LIAY :;(.Jrv('fIET((6_ ~ i~:rn!~ Vlt!-roi-IA .:JOh"l\3ts /4;21/2' /<:,4h5Af.A_ I '7/tf'JT~~f'Jr?i? ;V?M-3Drv I (4),0""'\ {\, P, ((4(-(!iW<~ "L (I - ' ~ 0 1/1- VI I ~ L () a)~&V'cL" ----- ~~ , !rc)~/d:i)~ ,c;r~\kJ1r----, _ h2l/~Mh'.s~h1 -#--/2_, / - f' ". ~\~';:'~ __ tfh!0J/fj~t~ -!}vu. S,~_ , "()!Ltlif'~;(/~"- , '--),[f / , . &.~. ,,6h,.~ c'" '/!? IL/ - C /'.7 / ...-- /{ '/~/? / ",-'J~'; -->)c. _ / '" F J }'-' </ <J. -/. ~ ,( j-' . '.' CI/.I '-C.-#;~'. '7' C...-c>- ' / - / /, V / For more inrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ Y5 I Lt- IDiimm REDUUE UONGESTION ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS: APPROVE SR-125 NOW! TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS .:H 3 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. Rn. 4;~. NAME ADDRESS jY\tr-Ttlh ~\i5~'(~ i-a S~~rt chl\~t_ 1~b6ff /fDf}lo~ ~ A- 04r~--L Oollv CAR;; '20 8& .:/ E-MAIL -~,~------ C(j,/I.., ~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 12!'l !lonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7441, or e-mail \WI.N.dtizensfor.I.15.co~ '-- ~ ;> :;> -:""", ~ (y .#3 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ,/~''-a'" f'~7//1'~~n !; /1',4'?G-/,(J{? L', ~70-,- E-MAIL SIGNATURE 'CfJ>. " IV .a. <.::7-, .. ~ ~~- .~-- 'Oz.. ~e~~. '-. ~itg~tr -~,..~) '--m/l~l/~~ L-.- ~c,vP 1. ~(r-, g - ffJt 1~4f. fAt ~ -h "t':" f ;; AflL '"B~'k' Q -I '0. '(" I c., G V^ V\ ~ /V~~-y K ff/rJts ~hA~ d 1-/, d,w,g~ t.. ILff HAftt/ll'J Y _ \ ) 1 \J! G ,J-~nI\('J oV _ 1;4 ce vi t~c:tVthJ-;.4 ~O~1 :~~ ,((~t (JI AL f.li1t& ./4L{ 1Jt Idr"J - ~~t.1i~L~(~~hat-=., ~1!!J".(.fl'~"L€ .r, h I vk~ J N~I\11t:. c ./ :;~{ ~~~k~" \ <z;;i , < I " I ',' I , . _ ''::=..' \~" I . V ~).;J..!+-- .). .~-!:/> (: I"", ~i' -::' -l:-(pT'"' '~5__' For more intormatlon ana petitions contact: lltlzens Tor 125 I:IO!"l!t1I, CA 9190<>', (619) 41l!-144:f, or ~-mllil www.dti1.ensfor125.com ". L'-- /I' ~7 ~3 ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAil SIGNATURE Lvt,S '9r( (::s '7Ll? ~~ q\qtO l (' '\ Iq~ _-" fA II.- A /"C-:.~ ---. -.__ -- ~CA Cj/1/f (A""",~;J,n.eJ:., ," I {JT 1/11/7 =J- ~- ~ "0- 9/9/0 ~ F r more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com o ~ .ttJlfI dlllMtA' I!.. f/df ~~~~(~ ;L )J1a/t~e'~,l! ~cU~J ;,. )4~..4~'j~ / ~ lrv1 It /. YlS r~i~ t. \.)0 (UAi\ ~ ~1q f{~u/I '--- (--7 ( ~~,~~b/ , ~I Te:vr 11 .-~lm_ "~:~~dt . ILL \, ~ ~ "- ~ 2 ~(y. ~3 , IDiiir!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. f, ~ J~~. ~. ~~~' ' - ~ k McL.wfvtt ""1\' ''YV\.~ '(, 2 , f'.- i ) ADDRESS E-MAIL j rill /7~/;" E~ (l iI ,t~ C( /,L' ()fj/4)'I" c2 '.h /lovu ~/svf,{,j :.N- t For more IrHOl'll1il(IOn ana petitions contact: (;jtizens for 125 / Bonita, CA 9HI02, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail .II.ww.citizensfoI.125.com ,- TO ALL ELECTED FEDE~TATE AND ~tl(~~~Lf- REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! . We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE f170(/j c~~-dt~.( ,/4 - ) ~ t'<,' C/,t-o (,;.~~ /'{ y /\~/. 5'" <'.., 'OJ" /- . /._.) l f1-' ,. 11) /;./ > CJI; L !.()-:.q' " - For morf. ""'" ",aLlUII dllO petltlons contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~IL (~ tIL ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL t REDUCE FFICIALS (II1fN !t} u 3i:j CONGESTION OP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! e the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ,AnnD!:'C:c:. ' a:'MUAII ~/t'o/ ~~<;" "dJer4~, A O::J. Cfu,udJC(wrz -6y r -:&-<<-1' ~ -L I For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 47207447, or eomail www.citizensfor125.com tr ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2.-- REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL ''777 ~ ~ 11'<,,,,,:>-0. ~^,.Jr\ . ~)~~~~~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail \wN!.dtizensfor125.ccm If ~ ~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! FI~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ) ,,~ 19"1<.S' "-/.3 1-4.... 9-tp_ r91S-~ ~V' Q tl_ fl. ~ ~-<- \~7;7i-r Q:~~ n~~ /to"J V' ~::A ~rJ-. ~..~ w~~ J ~~~/ J 1J For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472,7447, or e-mail vlvNl.citizensfor125.com t] ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to ~y Mesa reduced by 75% ' · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request th~t you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. " ., e f:~/j}?> ~sSr)~ ~ ,i\hn~~ (~r~ lIXVOJl f~\.(\t~\\\ IQl(fj ) I :1 For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (6'19) 412-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected ceholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. , / NAME /c:.-...- /1 ~ ADDRESS E.MAIL , '~NATURE \ ~/q~~c?s'h::::r+1 L~'IiIAi\j ::,~:t:~ ) --::~ ~J. AI_ c jy~~t lilfs JV\t C- \f\,Llh L \'. 0)( .1 For mo,.. "" u," "',,'v," 'lIIU p<<(mons contact: Lltlzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472.7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I '"1" G :li3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. j ADDRESS sP' ~ ~ ~-MAIL "ri~, /:/f'rS~ ~~ 'j " '11'19'5 iU~ 1'1'11 ~ /' fm more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor1.25.com iJJ~ /'~, ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! L We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~>oo 0 " oJ ADDRESS v <f2AtLo' ". (N!?< "Jj I~ ELf ~ ftr~ ~Jk~ ~Ih~ ~ v. o~ \' ~ ,~ I {/ t ~ '-' - . ~?.. > E.MAIL SIGNATURE _~"L<-(.IIVf_ _ f/I11 Ji,;/,"' - {k&r1 ~~ ~~~~ _ ~~e-f'~v~ IUtdv.P:iP?.D~~ ;. '" ~ .:> ,- (/ / For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 1/ Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-744"1, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com " ~t2 ;{ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! /' We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~Y\ IA\lelA, ~~ ~ (' \ - \ iiiiiii,; '~ \~) 1\'( I, V\ 1\1\. ,-'OVlt<) -Y"'\ \), E-MAIL 7 " '. ". j/ ,: eel J'l ;j~/v,<-y,-<,A-.?5'C_ ~~ fie; . '7.;Sklflf'j;H'~ . / /c ~I ~-, t? / I, I ~rr/ .~-...r //1',,', '/ _~ / ie ,{Lf...'i..'( (\ /(,,~./l-t: '\ f i/' ,- !- .~ ~/ r4C.~ . ~ ~.) _~ J!=_~':.. ~ ~~~- :__:t_,~~ _~,~"lEt,..c;.:;-~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com & ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% , · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~ E-MAIL , ..~ , / ~ veJ> ~ L. "~I"~ ~7 7 '- 'Yt'l4iL ~- ., ~~ , .. -' JIiIII1l II!. 1/ For more InTOnnatlOn ana petitions contact: lltlZenS tor '125 Ilonita, (/1, 91902, (619) 412-1447, or e--mail www.dtizensfor125.com '-(;,;f':::,~ ~\ TO All ELECTED FEDERAl, STATE A~~t:~~F~C~- , REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E.MAIL -'----1 ",., ,}.lll1r(n, f(~r;y171i1[7 J:,11m~ t S 4t'ln~;1":) ,1( ~ ~/4V1\ ~{''it-~ ...,~ I I )." .' - - - - '" "I ,,' "N >1 I ,- 'I (,: {lbtnl", ./111/' ,/) ~1.~ ',-, '(--t' Q (/1)0'\. II I '" !-- v ,'.' If':',' .';----.., /' ~ . t'""".. '- '/;/..._-...__... \} u_ Y'-c. ' ,-~ ,'-- rr--.- For more mformation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 9'1902, (619) 4'12-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.con1 ~~. Imiir!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESEN-rING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The con~truction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional TransPo~ion plan. . SR 125 wi ignificantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 ill shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example\: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. /'.NAM.E \, / /vi "sry WhiJaL ef ~ * (9~~-\J~ ~ ~\ ~ It.nnDCCC:' ...11 , _ E-MAIL ~ --\ ~. bC,,vvVVI' =--~ lj 12et ~."m~<;ofoOO~i"'''' _", 000"'" Clti=~^ / .~ Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1441, ore-mail www.citizensfor125.com /' ... t mmr!!3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congespon on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Down~own, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~ r , . .... cr,d - ~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com '- TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS .... ~. E.MAIL SIGNATURE i"a:bc -4....€.- ~(C$)t.A.. . - ~ ~ , "\ \~ JJ.~ 1 " ".{ l~.J 'X, /1.... lIu",,,,,,,!..,>- _ J!. J \1~' '~vvi\ ~ / Ij \ ,lAir:....,...,. ~. ,~ '\ i: "\.', . ~:t~ ~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 1 ( Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472.7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.c~ rp ImmI TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALt STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS t' REDUmrUONGEsT'IoN STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS /'n n_ .., E-MAil SIGNATURE fA I L() ~ /~i)~'" ~ ~~ .;,J-a~CA... \)6IA \ . ~ ~~~ ' Uv\,,, . !~'~/~~rv ) , ~Jd .j/. _ reo VFLif~f/~_ 1: ])w IV is &. r U/fIt /If;> q q-WY /^' 11 nil Y V . Vi r- 50 /~ . ;i For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 c.... -I- Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor.125.com ,. , v TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING S~N DJEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional J I Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. \ We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an electe officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. \ NAME ADDRESS ft __ E-MAIL fJ'o ~ TO All 'ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS \ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. K'fJs-ty Le& I?:. ;( '-1Y) iLcL Gt \ eM (~J 52: ~ 2 61!i --b ti / " '---"t/~ ~..,"'~~- :... /NAM'~~\~C?cmO~ AD[ \./ Co (\&:7 ~o. f() 7b, , , h ~ . \. ~l-\ <: . - ~- ~ ;d 4\~ ; v j~ td4 l (' _,._,L~l ',"" .\ ~ /~ V-/o;4J ''':11 ~ y 1-, ..' - .x ~_ )( . /1 , / ~>' For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2 ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE , @fJ~: ~\'l1 ' -N- ,~~"'" u~..~'-- \Zo.n h.~ ChO,<;<;-rr-(,-,l'\ (~ !.:iJLt-"IlW ~, .'U~ ~01 -~~~ 1 ,~ 0A l1J~( iz, . . ~ ~.>I , . _ . ~5t;'j"iet~ ~.~~ ~ Hh'1 Sf) " , I 1 i . ~ '.",' Ih ~ I . I) .. J', Ii!' rl "i\('.\- \.;^~ '"J'.) I l;U !' , j !{ (JM{I/ 4/+\" Y .5 ~ -t. MJolL& fb -~~ ~~ 2-- - J"- /' ~...~ ~~" ,$,~ /02> . ~ '~~~~ 77 ./c: "1..-' y'l7/> , 1 ilL( , ..J/h .,~ .' (\\ t~ \ [J I1iJ :'If(\ tth -----------..,.. .~ -") 1 r! Iii \, , yr . For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com rfqT~ <5A.z/c/~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALt STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! {O We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~\~'..J~'j~~-' ~ f \f((W?).((t.0~ J .PI hO(;[~f\<^ RetlhJ I ~ ~J(mn~ V ~~ b'<;-~ L} U 5'1 '" Ii t; /) "./7 .lJ [,nt'1t AM:;"" JJ 2 E-MAIL ~1U(O 1:2..c~t..<' =- -[~~~ ..' .-'-- _'S~:Zi;-',,- ~/ / I ~ t ---, 1/ -<.;1/;;,- . /..\- """...G;;; ~--'--:. '"' ~ "- '-,":\ ~.. .<;,~-;.-\. ""....., .. .. .' ',> ;s,--- \ ' ,j to ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. II#~UJ REDUCE CONGESTION Jt STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. . We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~.. . _ADDRESS -)f~ tJ i7J\b":-+h [B\J\S -: .~ _ Jfe e 4 J.~lf ~/> L j \, 'V\ E:sp N.. )(C>... E.MAILu____.._~ ~ . / V ~ I;T/ 0. / u:;: .' _ ~~:;::-"; td /t6':::.?~ Bit I d.o,; 7 (j )( 1I I II': y. i( ~. /' . i il/ Cx~ '(n'"'f"Z~!~ / .' .' \ ,~-.1' " .... / / ,/ . "', ,l/j!J/ . ~_ // or mor~ i/ltormation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 . . I ;' - Bonita, CA 91'902, (619) 472.7447,. or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ' . . , \1 q " ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT BELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! tic We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. I · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times\to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake t? downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . . · The construction of SR 125 has be+ delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is ap~roved and built without further delay. T E-MAIL " c, ~ ~ '!! r1t-"., i (~::JJi!i'!!! @ ~i I ~ . . 'f · L. - , -:1" .r f ' ~ ~ .1 ", For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 ,II ( , ,r Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.coml.J 1 IIC. ..' .~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND L~ALS. REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR ~ 125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been d~layed by government red-tape for years. i We the undersigned respectfully request that you use. the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE "= MI~ .J-- tJ L ~. 1.- ...JV For more inJ6rmation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 5 miiii:[!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS C!1f REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. /llJy~u.-v REDUCE CONGESTION 5tv!~v/ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAMe-:~I~ vf)1Jii~. ADI ~ J;' f 'ff '1 )>,'t>-Y'u~ '=--- V' ((~ fJo(~V _ .ULY 16udjLVr&-- vI&JWQQ~b tw\J.,~)L ://v6f/t-r /c~l-I ~ I . ' .~ .~JJt(k G-uh tyro: / ~ r ) 'j'f L 33:::BB \" \ 1'97 .1<..1 OIL c):}. I J ~ 11 et ~"'h 1-01 lei de !/}IfV f\ Re,,/ Ji: l::-) f For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS OJ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. A'6i';;,Iti?'V REDUCE CONGESTION 5j,t;/ ,,>_STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, ~ APPROVE SR-125 NOW! " "'V' '-"'" / We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ,~~.. ~. ~ < n \ {2 ^:J;~~ h~~'~ NAME I1zJv~ Ikfd,IJIIO J...."ncrr r HAil j , / ~ '<;- Wt.Yl F.ffc....e. Nnf!.VVI: +jCU\c>rw / s'1 - 96/3 , , For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.cit.izensfor125.com ~ ~~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ~ tt tlF Zv{ 1<.JJe=- fZ &- ^ - ~ '1'1'- ~ \.. J --lILdto < , ~ ?(:---'V~ J~ ~o" / 135 LL~1. ~o I )/'-< "/v l-.{i_ _ I IJli/{~n/~J4 -' fa' ~5'~{,(,-~:r 2 t-((Y_~7J~f-e~ ff->(i.I~C-() c/JrJA,/>-v-'I . '/9"1: rr~~4~,c '/[)f ~ ./"00 . if' ~'/'Y .;/ #// '"' . ~ _ .A'?'!v 1 ..J. . v [/\....-vl/cr_____ _.) ~'< / '0-" r. I~tf.cp I./.t, \1((' ou cD ~~ Y~I/ ;'., ~ 'o.-;~..o.. for mo?e informatio~' ~~~ ';ti:;~~; C~~~~;~~~iz;n;;:~ ~, /nv' <-io77Vlt11( .~ Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com / Of~ ( ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS r:' U.lI SIGNATURE - ~ <- ~ ----....,. ~;~HcY~ y. " /: t:" /'1; So ~ ~~ ;;v/ kT) if::. 1, fA j/;O"lr Y4-AJr;.. Jt( ~L~is;A} For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ;Y(~ ;/J ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ~\ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! / ~-- We the undersigned believe that: . . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time fro~stlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. /1 We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~cPv(M{ ~II\ : - ii / ~' -, ~,t, - -,ll:,~ F_MAII SIGNATU ~ ) <.0", - > :rr; ,-- ::j\S ~ '/ I" "/L L"'~I.."- \tL/' _ t n,.-! ,j,.",?",-/ . '-V)'I!L~?:~"I'~-~ "'==-_ // .,' ~. ---. ('// ' 1 For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dti.lensfor125.com (fU 0 ) ~ TO ALL ELECTED FED~STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! ~ /'-... We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We thr undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS I=_MAII information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 1902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com L ---< ~. i ~ I=fy; 1 L,,>./7 :J4<:/C.lflbL TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. A[\nDCC:C C_UAII SIGNATURE j[ o .E \ ~ />1 ~l._.,,~ -. __ _)1 For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com JA 1~ TO ALL ~ED FEDERAL, STATE AN([cicJOFFI~I~~ ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. j)f REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. N~RESS b lce-tL.. ~ ----.l ~~d ~ ~(i\\J~\ \~'f ~ -~ " ^if}A~U (-f.{ i~(,tV\;l(iil'> Vi, ~") \~ -A'41t\jy{~ c.(,,-~' ~ C11\;: ~~ (AS ?lei E-MAIL * a M-t\.~~ " _ !1li{VCtA5 ld'rfe~ 9' .l~~~ W\ \(M i\N,\\\ \ iW:r ') _ A.MYlJ'1ff; For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com crt ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ) REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. / I NAME I ftft~;:;' .'" Jv' / i ~;":>to.<) ,rOo ~G:. . .-.--: " ~ b\2:rAlk::f5 4!8-~JIL- ~NfOtIJ~ SIGNATURE ~(t ~(..'..{({ .....;,oko..(\ ?J} (n:to./,~ l.fi) < p I i~ ~N~lI~o 5 . '>A~NI trl cJtjrJ ~ CE:SAf~ CAt/U ~ ~ LL c 11- 1fnl " -:!2..... C J\-~' . ~.> For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA. 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I 1- ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OF~IPAbS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. flV?~ ? b REDUUE UONGESTION {i STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE -' I ~ - ;?' \\\c K~ ,'7:, 'f r-. '-Ie. ~~~'~ ;1ttJF fl10KhbeJY " ~n -~.~~J (3rcu:1 Rees:~, ,/ tf.... / L -((11 /' 0lW--V\ n - .' <:.' ::;)yy\ \ " v: > - - - - I ~J'~~~ . If' r For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~L\ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~~f ~~..~~_ ~ 5A arC! Garcia _ . E-MAIL r& /i.~' / 15. ~ ;\~,ae ~ ~ o~_/ i>Iktf;::!-7'; ) ~~;;Q 'i ~V\Q ~::, d ~'5t: / ~ For more \pformation and petitions contact: Citizens for '125 \/ .-V' Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor.125.com TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and'North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. / J ~I rGb~'&--/J tJrmS ~m... ~\.l ~cio ~ S-/H eLte)t1 /11 ~c I/; IS I ';;;:ks = C_UAII ~iit:"~ -b beV/ll~ ~~C) ? ~ ,1 ~' 41 { Ddv '',L far '6 r '/1:1 ]-c.hde '1rtbj f 0E'1""~~< ~)\:~ _y,mn,_ _ , OJ\0o'l For more information and petitio~s contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or It-mail www.citizensfor125.c ,.~-. TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2- REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streetsl 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtownl Otay Mesal and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%1 to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. , EA-~f- h/4/11IDM t ~. <;~ 0- Q.\o-.(1c f ~~~ ~ ~~.~,- ~/7_ : . ~'~'~~/;2-.7.-,,"- )'," ft~rrt NAME A F'\l"\nrrr J i ( ~ ~ " r.j,<;:"f\C,\) (C:U\<:"'" 1,/, /1>()// Il ') 7 r .... ~ -- ( - For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, eA 91902, (619) 472,7447, or e..mail www.citizensfor125.com TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL/ STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! >' We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. @> ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE . ? q17 bc UC1N \., - ~ C\., ct.. (~ ~" ''l/1J;1Jj~ 71-' 'I (9 77 : tf '7f I " H t elf LfL1 f ~ . C; /..;,i{C1 b;; I};;;?(~C'L\ For me S for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 47'2-/44/, or e-mail www.cmzensfor125.com j)S'\l j ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 1_- , REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ? ADDRF~~ 1""'1.\11 / ,,~ I~f/ ( ~ I _~// ""11 :fJ#;.Jc..e,.4 'fJ9/D ~ _~ ~~-\~' .~..~. ? r / For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com 4(( ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS <::;'It., lJ e.. r::,.~ t.,' IJ1,c~~&.._ f}fu,r:~t{f Ii (11 ~ 1fl6' /II 9k J) E L6'o~ -~Jrv', Wf! Li n ,> (PtJ' 1l'V; rr2-~ ~ \\A.. QJu:\- \ Ilf ~ Ji -/J )<C-t L:V (0, --I3Jr <- (:,- p. . <): <? >V )~ \ E-MAil ~ ~ t~ ~~ I{ ,,! '" '<:Jml;'. C~"1 'IS ,{dC.... -- " C r VE",1-,Yfj )<~n-1 "'Net , c- .Jo'l ~(;r __. ~ ~= :;.'= - ,-'1i!::'PJt.AC4- ~o&r..J&'M c:g J ,~" 1/ ./ ~ ~ _7 _%~..-.~ -- , ;- ~,.,...:...::.'" .'- ('-. - U_ ,,) /. "f! c:; (I' c- ~-t;JCi::.,. --,- \ -- (~...._\ '1-~ ij, ~r;f~_._-..... ~Tl:k~ZJ<;' (J':-i_ ""'7) I,' '! ~- - y- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com }FCI fr,.-<3 fde4/CIL [. t ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS . REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. tit REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. !'lAME ADDRESS E.MAIL _.LL_I_l_____~~ v '", /... ~Qn \-';q\1 E: ~tu*' ~~Y -~ ~. <; ~'\'O/5 ""'-~t~ I~ <lI1(~ \.f) -f) IV 1"'\ <5A.t~ '-' 5/'--'/ 1:: eO( LAID ~ . {~'I'" ...,J ~ v'-,. ((O/j 1,\.1141 51rft 1 :#/cT) / f;:c,,#,~- 3v- .~ ~~~ ,_ )~(fCiQ6~~~' For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472.7447, or ",-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~ r _# t.f 7C''7.s~_._ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! I We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME r---u SIGNATURE v J"Of?P_ 1\, ~jrl'-I\'\ ~ ~i N1IJCI'IY I)vlA 1L /2/ III Dr V7necJ , \~\(\!in elf \ 0 ~Yhn-t (\C\mrtll1 , -J:r~. !;riJ f:i7 .c""~ ' = ifCi~'U"A~ ->' ,l !<; '1a~_ - c, ,Ji::)<--_ I( '!!3}0~u. he~ <'7!1{)~ =a.:-- ~--. "I Cjqt;14. ; . / ~~n\(j;N1V~ J J(}~,> (S(,(.,\ (PI J: ."'.\ ./.p- 1 vYJkJv.. b~ SE.1l Cd ~ (}..\ '.2,h<::"fTb-2\ 'n~rpe~ ~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com II ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. Ilw tj1/ l:J REDUCE CONGESTION Ii) STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. -- ---......-...--....-.-..-.... "'.--.... -. ....... ...--.,,- We the undersigned respectfully request that you use th~nn1f[fence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. J.""...."~L"L" ~ UlI.ll ~ 12; lh . 1 ~IG ...- '\. <->2--_ ,..,- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com /1' {l ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAl,S REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. {/ctfJrJ GEl J REDUUE UONGESTION {lr STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS po...... ~~ 1!L ftf/S Tb~1 t;~LLS :ltC, L,i".-<-/,j ..... .....-- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 919m2, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ) 7 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS I REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. f/Mlt! t{H2> I REDUCE CONGESTION ifF STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. . ,( lit CltCcf< For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com (hi</61/::'s/rJ !) 00/1>> <eJ / ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS n REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. I -<AA, JfbYtVtw'v REDUUE UONGESTION 5cJu~/ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa.reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL v\ ~\ , c -'- --.J ,_.~:. ,-;-, C' \- 'J\J~'(~~J~ ~f~')>r: -c-' __ . "'y -:;:>. '" . V cO liJJ-.r,'J,.- I vv\( \/., ,:; ~...-. j /:' .4 -I j.j,r'.(/(- __ 1. So.",dyc, A ll.-l"d -7 1 i /C~b:iV 6), ~~~'\!Jf;, r . ; I For more information and petitions contact: Citizens forl125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1441, or e-mail www.dtilensfor~25.com -\~. 4 \ \ ('1\ . , ' f. ", 'I, -', ~ /- " ". \'( ,} '\ , . /"'/1 ",_, \..,1 1'._',". j.... ,,',..,r__.....,? ___, ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS F_MAII /5; 11 , ;) IJJ./-// - ru uk e t7 1~t.1'I <f Ie. ;),#-2t"~r: ~..L~ ,ejJ.e. irOitc€C cI ,J~=~ Cr~ z; l-,FllJ or more In orma Ion an pe I Ions con c: It/zens or Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412.7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Qtay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. \L .\"\ H\;':',"1\ ,,"If.:- f?)t\.\4.~ j~;:~~~ ,/~,. .:-; "10-~~:\ 't>'f},;" +hiv\f\'I~.) .lJ ~IVIt! L)(~ if' ~. -, ..--r-. "') I. . "''"--::..t.-1 (.-> ADDRESS E.MAIL ~ 'fJ [) I (j ) "~ OUIt~: 0- ~ h'Krnl, C hr;me ('!jlr-- Ai2.R'-- l,,,,,q -', Lt'J'? :::2--~- ~ U:~ ~ ~ --~, u~ ,.' '- ~( .~ - ,'5: nfiJ;o/d ", ~- . ~ ~'j(lR( For more Information and 'petitions contact: Citizens for 125 aonita, CA 9190\1, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor12.5.com / If j ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL , SIGNATURE ~\,~ hr~/J vIlff1lr dJ t, r ,-4/ 'OUf'. (/{I~ ~ l..-..... ~~~- Qi'J7J it~ ~;k MJ .fcf:J2-1 SI' '-1<;I.14:"-I:l /1- For mOl~ ....v...'uUVll e,",U petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL l> -- " t... , _ ", ., _. ~, l Mr ~O vtt:::.-C; ,/tir;;t~~ J (-__~\r\'\l;:C~ :J~f~ jt>'2m" : '1L~:;;:~ : I ':J/v( ) '--' .0; -' . 0- ~;?(i~ ~ha/2t11 . &t~ - ;; _ iJ. q /7<-"" i/fc 0 il For more infOrmation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 919{)'Q, (619) 472-7447._ or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com I...Jf ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL S IGHATURE 1/t//"'C~F1 ~~< ii::loncrrecom "- .. ~ ~ , w-1ft-.k;:x)'CH, k9......... l'C.C.~ ;r~ Of ~" jASf~ , c lA-\ \lj ~tr~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (6'19) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ! .. ;;r:.5. /;;:: Y / ~---- ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned belie~e that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS . ) L L'S-[ ri 1v}J CtJ./1 ,:V~ /?l~n~n lJ,'rJ f~ & ff:/ff/ (,1 ~ .a' !17 ~~-7():- - #" / ! ,., i7 .. ' . './--Lii4A'-U<;:th;t77J./ .L rn-.IIli'A. (' Sf R. e?1c ,J)f\WV wr(~ V{1- E-MAIL ,~ u - / oL !?Cf ~ '0 I I 'J , I;' For more II II VII lIc;n,IVII dllU (.)\':\.11.10115 contact: \.ltlZens Tor 1 5 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com \~ IiIiimm TO ALL ELECT~RAL, STA:~~~~~( ~FFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE \(R.\,:>n SC\~M.~j,,^>bl17 ~ ~~/v 'j i0hu "~.;~.'- ~effHl - . ..- ~ ~_.) ~~ _ r ( ~ ~ ( /'-?A ~ ,j/~---~-- ~. ~-~~~ 'V RIUlAf,j) AgMlf1~ S~llit1J1dYJ 9f/~ U/~r/'" C,A-i,/,r.bO ?/( ~ AVhfClR-O CiM-tctv {6 (}v For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~\ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! 15- We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS S/~~(tIA;~~ h6~ A I/, v/l/#i )ftWJJM 0((1, 1 <'t Ii tE,.. E-MAIL S ( ........,'., If' QL.-- (J OfiA ) ~! l /1 J CA ~ '10\ \ ~()\{ I'-{ Pw ~,\Q W\ --11 erf G j Jr)N..iTlESV!J(YIEC I I Jf/I<=-l-lrvE? [;1VJlf For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ,1f~1 ~ TO ALL ELECTEDFEDE'RAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS I~ 1 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced 'by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL ~ ;+/ if t; fr". i'>1 t'e 74-1", n I] i-I'J)~ \\'\ACI/!c~ I WV\.-,--\Q2- Ul106J' \ For more information ana petitions contact: I.ltIzens for 1 onita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com l'JtJZ- (J '7 c:;r' ~ ~ II TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME 4Ct1./ .J Q- ./~ . --c I. ";.) _9. ~G"Ul/'/ ~) 0\~(. '\ <:: (/ '4)\.\ (U) en ch O-P.fi) <;;::"/;"~~\Jrr _, f\(r\,r",-_ E-"",(C,\" fI.M",nl--;::> c)'zZL-<C( ,/ 7;c;i~() ~5~-'~-~) :--;c;.;;;;,;;" )/%.~,<'" ,i( ,~ /y:. ),'/4:L~-"0 '7",,,--,,, ,\ \\";"';'''L~ - (?r'/\"n- \J:J,o.,t;;.._,_ -:> '-~- " .) \,-, ):: - _! ~r " ':;' '. ..f A b ~L--i f/, ...j]"" ;;'L / ('1.- / I. . ',' t :t{ i j'l ", - (/~~: _ " //:-JA _" -J,- ~i !AI .f Ii Ii ,7/IIJfl ~ , t'f!.~.~, 7' t;ii~'l.-i". ~~- J' I /''';'(; _ fYLo/; ), P ~LI14. ~lh:f' 5rAceL k.J-L1Y.Y:)( _ 1f) 7.7 9r-e,4/'----"-'-----_____ (J For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for +25- !:Ionita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.dti7c>ncf,.,..O" ,..,,~, ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE . . - --L-<-1 10 ~ TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. & REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, '-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. v ( / . ~, '22 /J- '--. Z7 #~ 7/ 4 -.. 'l ~'" ._~~ F;~~(':0 __._.. '_. ~ .::~....." . / For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 1 \/5 ~on~ta, t:A 91902, (619) 4j'2~744J. or e~m;dl www,..if,....."n...C_...4t'H=' _____ L.;- --+- , Ct' ~ t'i/N do r 1.4-., YV'-L..: find Ii v.)("~i-t?f' _ ; . (fU~?:7""h...-cl :55 - --- ,J2~l.r/2~.5 / .GfJ;1/9/Y'.2: \C!seJr'</<) ,(:0 U I":, (" ~ AClo lJPL!.:') ~'171 C rJ; J'/, ; ;) (J , -z -~- ;C; , )( -<.'./\ ....0 r"'- '.....'-.(_f .. .j/..I o tll :;); ,/ 7 ~ t. )') ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. rc REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. f SIG'TURE,~ (1'1' HC'~I?'-.e ::It f? ^,~oL ,Co v" \ Lj 7J;'/E"tcE I r:---" //~{ I" ~ el( '1 If 'f ~ .. . 11/: (C. f< c-- I. .r-=-- \ ~.) '-::.-,"\Dlf.,,--1't~')'- --'--..) (/ /? / ~,~ Lf'~ '71-:i~." <-\\tA . , I -.;;.; ---.. \ \ 'i ~ ~:_~~,~~ I I 1/ ~ \A1L""- v.- '\lSl, 4~ ' ( c( .. -FL--- .':\\\\ c:fJ.'Ku~A. ~ "chi (l.Iood '7+ I CnJ l ~ '''1' I /' eF-? /\ ",/lb.) Vu<'3'h'../LA I&J~__ /V -YAOAak1~~L-~, For mo,e information and petitions con t: Citizens for 125 " & Bonita, CA 91902., (619) 472-7447., or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com / ~ \ ImiiI!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. &; REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streetsl 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtownl Otay Mesal and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%1 to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E.MAIL / -- SIGNATURE : . ...--;; / r ~., 10-U.9 ' t' jj c" III \~I'XiI'j' (,' III lj;~(-'?i(~:~~" ._)/ c.J ,,' [ , J ~,\~J0l\Li.., . . ~<:;'\\c.\I[('\. 1'( IC< \.~ ' j.;\ cJ(') h" ') Oli\ _ '---', ':"((Cc,,,,-,, ('\<<y~i> ri< . .' I';'; I" i '(\(/ -t" le, .- f::f'"~1-'1.".,, _ G,i"."'Of!..6'-; Ire' _ .' n ',' ~ rkkSo}\) f<;J b:;.;':; [VI f\ VI f-l "[IV llY' I'.) r. -- i_' / 11 '" (t' J , '\ " j J rM'^-, . . For more inrormation and(j;ietitions coKtac:t: Citizens for !:lonita, CA 9'190!~, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail www.dti.l.ensfor1 \ ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL[ STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. & REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE v l 'reg: ) / '7,,1/5' . 15' 5- ( j .'lJ/ I ~/1/~-I.,( '_ _ ,;~ !,f For Illore inforrl1ation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-'1447, or e-mail www.dtizen..for125.com \~ ~ TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. lO REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~.MAII t 'j]"" / ~ 7 (C} Q:'1f'1 , '9< 1-. -, -- ~ /../ _.-J--- I Y.' . /,;0".." ./C'-' ( V~--<"" . ,. ;" t-I f!5-L /1 '7, L /)/)6' '1 ~~ ~\ ./5; L~O ~ f4<t ~ llV!-Vl \"( Ile- - ~ ' ((('1'/( ~L/,i 0:W(/_ r ~ :. 't For more inf5'rmation and petitions ~o~tilct: Citi;'ens-for 125 !lonita, CA 91902, WI 9) 472.74/1.7, or e-mail www.citizensforH25.com (~3) ~ IDiiir!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FfuERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFF"- REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. (g REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE 8R-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. 6:'j .' ~ ~~., , .~\!:,;I.<I , . ",,-i.iY-'":. . - ') SIGN~TUR~ -1( ) /V./'J 7-,:' ,. ;llh ifi)! '1< . , ' '/ t L .. ~.'., ., ..- - '-' . ~I' '/ ~"'l I~_' " v..," .. ~" . .~;C;:;;~c/' ADDRESS E-MAIL (' J J. . f6 <: ~\f'{,.P ~~ . )'J>f~ 0. <2;t;NflA\tft I (/'Y) .-' I) 'I (, !j i If / ,t ( ,III( u I~ ' [,> J1,J.-,-( ~\'" ~n~ ~q 9 -bWa:.. !JrhILttl 1111 /, irf{)io(A6, -f/'[ L,{'~ 1 (,)[( (. <~)-':{.7Z~ // .-:r=- . , J 7 1. Old ',) 7 ^ ";$I~,/L1..'-t"''.4y/', . ~J:j (l<</I'L.}/ ;.7'/ 1/ For lI10re Information and petitions c.ontact: Citizens for '125 . lBor~jt-<:'i' CA. 91909:, 9) 419,,,',1-4Al,'Ji or ~-m~il 'l."Vf\Arciti~j.~n~fc-r1 Q5.com \ 77 ,_." .:) ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. \ct REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! "'. We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL ~ A--'lk,;;CM ~~ A ktk ~~Y' - r / ~ ~.{\L '1/~~~1 0 ~- D.ZoJ Lr\ 1:. At>A.~f '--- -:,. -:\D 17 vJ C'rLB-rre LAw't6fL f\ktMA ~ +WW' i LG... kf'C-'-- {f f1./v/<;or. _ 'Ju.t e.. tr'1/e/?C'f'l ?All/ ~\t\A(cI~ :XH )l6lJJ~!' ~~ ~~~" < ~Ay -5efJ4/lJU ;:} .I~ 'j1)f1~efr I ' ~Ollley \, . J For more InTOrmatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7441, or e-mail w\l(\N.dtizel1~for125.com :2 :5 ~ TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. lor REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and '-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. F_MAII :b ~ J: ;Z ~1/ /...('\--w~~ 50T1)v ttLgI~~ --::;;;/1 /. tJ- ~rJ . 9'/ 8'@ - 7'/"11 't '7 v :.g;~A IJ~~ . ~ ~P/j~ ~ ~ v '[7 /9d 'u () C/<C\,. }~ / For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 !loniti!, CA 919011, (619) 412-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor1.l.ir..... ,/ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFlcil.LS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. \t REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL , 5b- .j ) , --.. Yl f, "l/'j(r .?:, Ji-. h ;~"rI ~f ~fl,f/3 ~... . !'ANa OIUooJ$!C\ ( ~ -<' ~' { lOll ,I! 11,4 ----L For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.citizensforH;>.5,ccm l Vi, ,1 ~ \ 1 I ~ v TO ALL ELECTED F~L, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, v'/ APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfullY request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. !'lAME J-DDRESS UOY"\r\ Q )cGAhLVl 1!#tf1€I'~ ~oJ - !jt!~_.t:::: ~ 3taruM~ J ~. j m\\\~ N\D6Nf E-MAIL } Jt:L 91~11~ ~ ~ _~--~~,1 _ ~ , ~, - V /'f t" ) , ~ A"j fvfoOAfC-- ' ~HrO( "k-.-l -;so h ,St.r-- \ Wt-~ '*rA ;j ..t , /0 -+ --l-~ _--1 ,.)/} for more informatiorr'and petitions contact: Citizens for i 25 """it.. CA 9190.'2. (619) 472-7447, or e-mail v..w.N.dtizensfor125.com r CJtr~ , \\ l~ mmm TO ALL ELECTE;;;DERAL, ~~Du0i1;Fffcf~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. .~ f' ,.klt'~~~' .; ~~~~...~~~!i .J~~ f, - ? ~ -"'", ~ Hokl1/irY7/// -'- . .. E-MAIL ------------ 1. Jc 1.f-' . 7/'11' 'J . ! U 'J' ./ ~'I 'r!f1--. ,~t""-\-k_ I 1 (}/D/'ri.;;f-r i --.- I .J ,:/- Y .. c ", . :;;1. L /- d/ . ~ <1'-~,/-:;/;. /,-jt' ( ~4 ;t~~/ C' /(jZifZ'd~/It_U{.."t d~ ~~J?('~-(- _ f. -~.-G~ /;0 "ife; ~ v?- Z /: n ~ .. .' .. .'....,..,../ 'J .- I ./ vl../Lt{.A ((f}'1 /1 v. {/'&/....'-&<). " ,'_ _7 . " 6/ trlf:~ :7- }li{t ,. .. 'j ( f ('" i;:;u';,tC. /Ll For more information and petitions cont<lct: Citizens for i 25 / Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e--mail wViV".dti:tensforH1.5.com . J4. JHv~'- / ) ((Jf1 Plf--r1\1 VLft\ ~" 15(9) \\ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! .:. We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS 1:t O'f(j b( ad t:'-n t. 1l'!'~'tf'~ _?- rv U.JtL_' ' E-MAIL t ~. '-IB/W,..U'l eft liftTeNA \ . ' t.ul1- \-1 y c, \/ e \ 0. '7-'-{ , 1fxhn 1\\' ,/Jc c, ~r'" L PI1.lr'~,; l' , : "fl" 'I" /1;!I/itl ~ e ~j, G LD/'/D(J, 4S;<G<,) 10 0...( bO\(e. 1=-IO( €-'-s. "'4- !,. 77 y. if ~ ,d;v' 11)'>lCqido{ L?\._ ~k(rJ.,/;4> lJj-y[~<h:h> '/' ~"7 ,? ;.//1 , /) / I I' .~Le-7~,_.....t.L_'~lJ '-(~'~-c.j ~yy~ ill. ,~ '~"_. .' /', ,'7-/.,,",,-----' -ur..' ,ti:;!;,,<./d~U,l-( '_. t~Sf ~wK~ , ) U lap/diu!' /l",/M; 'tl ,~, - j .q'(;> /(l)oAJ i11.I.N~J> -i ' '\ ,/" IV.!'; , ..(1'\ ( lr / /(/, '.. J t:n; (/;1/[/>/L'1[_ " - ;-Z./I'f ,~~n, ~'/'~.~ "Iy (;/7/") K~ II., // r'S"/ / ';I..I~"'lAfl 1//11 ---fit. _" .'" // . --"'--.- ' /' ~ - - For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 I'IO!1iti!, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~ TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAL(4f- REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. c-n ADDRESS - CJ-W'2 ~uie ~ t<ej?)C" W,C\C)hw~_ !(()}1J0~~r _ , {fuJo vL~4 61tta~ ' \Sf~~IA~ .q m ;ch(A~ r E.. VVt1= \kxshuo \.Jo~, V\M-. ~ ~ 1 ,yeT ~ /)/()f! eu... SIGNA RE ~ - \~(()\'\ I) rot.- L:L o ! ~ 1 ) L ;'Coj..> 7? /N I) ,J, ~~)~= ~ \ --:n '(,Ii. , '.', \ .' . ' , . - \' ".' ". I, ~- .. \ t ""~- ," ,\ "',,, " l," /'; , 'I I J.lmrJ\\t, 00~1)c\lkL ..... r:f 0,),' . 1,\ v For more information and p~titions co\'tact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or c-mail www.citiz€nsfor125.com "''' ~-' / /,. ll,;i!.../, :::!'"i;1. c-/ "1 " 1-; _ .,". ." / 1;,.", "l,../ t ^ \ ((/"'I ~,Y_,:.v ~'_....- ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS Ifl REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. $1 REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME JIA~M~ ~/;;j4n- ( Dane+-k f)IJ /,f fa /( . ,~ ?~(f \rJ --1-\\Jfd . (J, J.eo11~~ >-<Z~h~ ~.~/ . !/~~ yet ,J;1AA Cet s'7 res ~ . "Lot ~ vJthb )fa,//4 /:' fi44. Lv\o\...... :j(\:"'(.\i\ck\ ADDRESS E'~IL r < C\\~C()' . fx!lfl/ a. )] /;i)r-fl-l- Nl (~~ , .J- 5 rHu0 k. (;3 f'(lp I 4 OJ () VI vi (). fcre ft1J-G For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 l3onita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ., ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS I . REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~<\ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downt~wn will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~--- ADDRESS E.-MAli r/3 1'(/ c ~ --.) Ie-- .:> , , ngc / i ("0. 4:kill->L J ' - _ I"'S 01. I e{"ZO _ &-.~ ~,---- ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS PI- REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME Lo"<,> "');) , ADDRESS E-MAIL SI~URE ~~-~ - ~'-- "i r '7P' i.! (f<t ,.-'",- ~(J'> ().)\r I /U If r I ill 0 For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS )1- 1\ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELA IS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. N1/J t!tv Uv/\)I1 i2b5Pr SOT() ( -~; _LLl~;<J::fJ [-Il 1F , -< For more information and petitions contfct: Citizens for 125 ' 1 t:-;r- Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com F-MAll G \ ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. V; REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~E ADDRESS A"6Lf-f fy~t{(/d- C" (j \- l~_~~__'t 0 L:~ ->,......~~// - ~ 6'V/~ ,,_Jl^-;\("'-, \LO\~ Cij:J' , "'\\:' S L,: S E-MAIL (L.-!..<:;,---- [t1/IIi..-;!;ir.! c) STi;.c/l'J!:. lit' ~ /J . 'It:;, {o};(Y/s ,~ IV! (I;r/ t / );~,;>/<z y, I ~ '1'd t,!, j _ (l n._~ . . \.~. r ,/ ?l :;/1) ~il~~ -, )f' ~~ -,' ~)-Y~d ~_:l;i:, {, { f-( _~'-{;!~t//~.~-:;('~-tJ"';'?? , ," " . -' ../'>'," ) JlN- ('{/l1 ij1f;;'/ /;r:0t:~_ r!2::i 1-:.9[';/ 9/9-"1>& JJ (' ' T' 'II!", I< ,,/,. ~~}'_!}'" ;~'I /';1"(0 ~--C,./ ( /) , '7 ((11.-;<--' ,r ( ) .J.-J~ ( ~ ~r.:'P- For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 !!onita,- (A 91902, (619) 472,-:144:/, or ",.mail wwwdtilensfor125.com \'-\ ( ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. &; REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. j ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE , c ! ~" e~ J l '0/J zt.~ 'f/tc'd ~ ft;~~r I '-- . :.4: afr~~~ K1u~ r ('(jut< I... /If[-~. -&~;;Z2 _ /;;,;1/!i)1;f: For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 J-- ._- !Cloniti;1, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizel1sfor125.com \~, ~ TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFt REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! \, \ , We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan, · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. j ~ r(r:u,~ 5 d 1f A. 8e6'J/e 4J..,...2;~ ADDRESS , ''\ E-MAIL ~d~/~/ .-J~tl~ cJ~-R~ _ _' c. ...i...."...,....., '_ I"'~ -/ . ./\ t.,:>-,; "'-.- /J {I'(:'>J' , ( ~. C... 11 P.f<W-::> .-1" tJ /J;T; J,lt" -./...J /) Jl; ! - (A;Th~l,A ~~ ~ , ~ ~r - '6 ~5 .~ ~ Lcyki' ~~ '- Y S- -<<1 i]J.a-.( 5 () ~J~ For more information ilnct petitions' contact: (itizens for 125 9on~wf eft. 91 ~O~!. 4f2<J"~4 7,iJi' i:::-mnai~ WW\N3'jtij/.~i:;ri5fo.ri 25.com 7' m:iiiiI!l9 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. \} REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE 8R-125 NOW! " We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~. ,-0 NAME V NfI{!J1>A ~m0. \\ fA :r b;f/~ . fr~~ ~ rJ-A'2...D & l'-rH ; ~j;;'f : ~vo" I//Jil ~ "kz SLV'vl oj'-1fi .:fh \V'7 _ (fiD~Ca- ~ ~ D~7S hrJ 1bJk' (Jf ~=Z :: '., ~ -.-ff iTtt~< ~~~ for more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Soniti!, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ,~ -2-- " S'-- ( T' 5' ~ {" J; f~- ~.j' , ,,/----( 7 f ,S Imiir!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE f1p~~f~l~ 'r~- ~" _____" ,Ii ,'/1 ' ,_ eo' 1",-", , 'I )"" " ,t..\. ,~ ", J.- ,( a"-, ).~ 'I~~")..[(_' , ,?{/c.j/'/ - '&'4-- _j,~/!'t7/t? ' e-u )/f( ;l . 6 ) ~r s ...~- ,/ , ~~_a;It~;'I~'+ f ~d\ :\~i~ I ;$J1K ~Z~/ _ ~':. 'r,C -' U / -;;-f2--i (!. -~ ~4 If j'~tt J/i2///Ib " " / 04cJL~ (),a..h, ; Y 7 I.(,{'J c;'C7\. Y' (/J C/eJ-~1..r; i, f . ~ -'~~ ~p1;;;. -~l{Lr~ I_a , 'nai\1\e1 ~- ,A/ ,,' .'>1 "'"if. ,cL_ fl' j, ~L': ~ ;_, '_., SiiJl3AJrts R t:, /.I()R^L__ 11 ( /, I.. '4" -~ftt~ - For more inf()flllduun dnn pelJUOnS COnT.aCt~ t~ltl?;ens for 1 25 ..<._ BOllita, CA 9'1902, (619) I! 7'2-74-11, or e-mail www,citizensfOI'125.c()n1 ,~ ~2- ,)-/5,---" 7: s ,/7 C:/ )s-- ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALt STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~AME AonDF'Cc:. I:_UAII SIG~ATURE fJJLp~~~~ -I- 'YLJ".')4.. . iJ. '1'i .,' ., ( " ,,; ." 'c' ' \,.atlt~d'J,t-. /1 tJ "~ '~;1,.,:~-' ~<<l~ ..' -I' a ',.;? - _j,0ft:!,d'7r~ )9 (/t..C /t/ 7((.) , ;if '. ..._~....., j f-S{i ,\,.,b/tshll'u -EtMlt _~~. ,I ' . .ii:/ r~"~+' f<;~h: :~ . '~f7k 'h/f!cl -9 j 1j:~2 ~?t/ ---".F l ' - - '_" /1.1- f!41(i'~(t jJ.~ ." , j oidc~ [)'cJ.JI;-.!1 J.(n C;:0\,'f' (r) C/eJ.~ I <~:f!;trt~ kJfj r. f -Lf-o t ", '!l {!It i\r\~ 1 t.Je~~ ~,Ll) 1(' ~f} /: IU:L" '....1. ,/ h j ii S(J ;=}J rtsR if, 110 Ie:? ^I- _ n__J I /1 I . For more information and petl~kms contOlct: Citizens for '125 ..<, lIonita. CA 9'1902.1619\ 4'12-1441. O~ I:-mai! www.dtizensfor125.com J ~ i , I I , : '., ft Imiir!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. jf11f REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantlY reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS fi. p L 4 f5QFrJcJE:, (or In rper e... 4;i~i/Jtl/;n/{ t. , Jet"I'IIIW lJ,Lb/75Nl _ ~lilL /c51t7U~ , z/4"#;A-a~ C Ifi'f-/lie5 t1, P--~>" t'" HlAn/er : ([h ,,---0\ _ / F;t,ltrV!j, E cti I '("P/K _ UwvfhU) MfA r2fHr- ~ R-1\"J.d.llD f-- S 0.!' . E-MAIL , .,. For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com \"? ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE Atfo~~6;FI~tLS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL r.;? /.3/ 1: \ . '~A- IV\! ~M\"" DiA2 "1 A'""\:Ji'j:i\ t ! f\ _ ~~/~q; ~-~~~=-~ - '1 frl 7 () \L v "q-ILtt ,\ ~'Y ~;r~~:ff~~~ to' -,.}?",,;y _ /~-;_ ~ -: /..Ul~ C, v ~ / cr / / j.Ui.-t.;/:z/;//' , ~/ , - (j.( ,I l'Ycf ? (Cr(1 ~fj(;j ,II ,C""'<{~A .~h~ '1J1a k<, , ~!P1<<-'1MCi(: /1' It) lIt'.Lltt:/ F J'42/ I ,I '). / -/ //, . '- /' l I . -T'.?<:A{' '" IX .LI!.Z.-- ;; )~/? .",/ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 9190\1, (61 !l) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor-l25.com C,'",') i ;~. (,'/ I ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS /3 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. k1 REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~ \C( lJi. \" t-t E-MAIL 1(7/0 7// 118 I~ It r/9fO i (,1 1\ eM r:At! ~/ '&n1a~ \..o~e~ }J\ tYvt\\1 Jf' '""\ l IC \A \\.\j \ \0. (Y'~ \c( {,SeA. 17 Dr'\E:"iO. Ur'St4/1 l\{\ b\' If \ "> j ~~~X ~\)Q ,j~/. / .... .,'i ., (.-,j~ \~.1 f .~ " For more II1Tormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFI.CIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~(\ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! i3 We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. \ '" NAME j;lnJ: .<wes ~?rA~'2.A-MIJ)~---:il'1 '_1 (I'do ;)ti'itl('J(~ ~'f1lN\lc...e 6rodl j -IlY.. ,1(; rr1 C rode y _ ~ ' Vl II 0.-+, Ie/V'l I v \ Vl~ f<oc he \ G; nstnss. KOd/~ rvlD.0R ""anW ~ Dl D(ljAr1 0 '-~-(j.r..,...A::&\\\b\~)~~\\ (; ~MCJ Oma Ii : ~ / . / \') 0.'\1\0\ 'Y.~ S <) \fvz.. SIGNATURE For more information and petitio s contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com '; V, I ~ II 11r a 1fi-f f I ~~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 't REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS {!#/f 1/5:2~, ,1 rk ~tari ~IQie.. ~rf1--- ~;~.I, E-MAIL Q 7/0 1~(O ~ 'II - ~ -,ru- . -- /" ~."'}_.___.. ... c~ ~<~,,<';**'j~t!d7f~ ('n . 1,<, n. :(7/1.(f(1 , I: r., Ii i . I) ,,).'\C~ ), \{! ~n (I:~ no _ ( \ (t. '.! ! 1)111), ' (i /(' ! (1"~( J { -:{(tj/\ /1 /J " .. ~+~:/'it, d ~ft/~t,1:~lr, For more illf"q'rmation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Jb14+t-<!-t!!-<? )( , C!~. .~ Bonita, CA 919'01, (619) 472-7447, Qr e-mail WWIN.citizensfor12S:C;m (J (b ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. 0 REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E_MAil ~. L ~ ~ .... I < po b -e.," ~') _ -'\- ... ~ JrXrJJ1~~f!e/ >L-.Yo 5 E" fV{4 L-D_ j > rJJo..iC IL:f ~L Co i39--v(..t'\ ( () ~ -J)tft-J ;t) t,;if, 4 - j Yr . C "" it. >" ~/ " ~ .1: :> " &--ct. u F AhI/!/l. ,i/ :<,11 Cf/..(o //.".....<-, For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 lion ita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.c.t,m 'IJ ~1H ""z. / I ='~. ). ~&- 19 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIA. REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ro REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! . We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL lJiCf::/r./it? -_-~ J L( t'y/ltir; . ,-e!~ , )hl,lnnl,n~JlU~ J ' tr;:/J r/ I k (lPr::1t:. '}\/1;) II Lj For more information and petitions contllet: Citizens for 125 ~oniw, C,;},~ 9'i 9G"Q, ([;;'19) 412,~ 7'44 'I, or €:.'mSJil.NV~t\I/.dtil_en$foi'125.com ;4i) diu ({ji/t.t../rJ - 1: dp j;.C-"'--- \"v; ,; Cfr'/ /..J .;,,4~r/{~j)c) fr/l/fk!~ [J mf;J . Iff(( ~ 114 u (., ( J~h ! ('f\Cil ~.~ ~ @YlJ~1.~K V ~1Il+~I1U blACt\.1'>4.. , / ---r :..JC'\.._V1, (~e .... q...G.t,(~r~ -r " 1,1 "),' :./' ~!(,,: . 'r .' {j I..- {.( / ,/ .. ) J :!L:1 p ~,,-;--- ~:./\ ~~ . jr, ~.L{ ____ t C"" /'71l-c..,~c--~_,;/tI-C:./ p'.,- '-- Qo mHmI TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. c.c REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME tv SA- f<(J,U~ . I ' );;L" ) ADDRESS E-MAIL I. t ,/ . . E~.y~ "S~~~ Jh~' C::~t $;lb;. . A' de . /)/' .~ ..,' I!!' ,I /~'iZ,(.tJ/J~ J 1/ II , DANIel W1E6~~ ~< ' 't 0101 ~N'lj fu 61\ ~/ { 11./ (" j tf - ) ) ~' , - //y I J/ ~;. bb()~ '1 ~-~. /....I-.-<': I .t-. C"-\~ I ";(.\,~<-"'pl ,--. , (. J Leb'ili ( /)14~((' Jt. ......) , / I':} '- 12 ; '" , '",'/c .,/ / . 1Li.i- c. ' ~~ ~.r~~ }~,~ ",-1:-- k For more Inrormatlonand petitions Contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 919112, (619) 472..1447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ,- ;1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. \fV ~Il REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL J!;:;; ~t;;;:~ --'=-}YFl~Y'~ LlJ ,1\0 (A r;f- , - l(l'J.S-E 163 j For more information and tfetitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ fL/ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS-' / REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. /ltf(ll/ jtr; ~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS "t1l3- E-MAIL (-~ c--= ~ ~1A.& ~~ ~ / .~~~ . L_ ..~,~~ ~ 'f/~ ~ 'Ii' I -"-~, 4.l7t~( ilL. I "1'14' ! / / GOI1t:o(() (11;fOJ~\ .' 'G-"""1~fD- QdZh~" V J,Ai;1/1-1.- EJ(JI"~S__ 'II ~~3:: -~- For more il:lformation and petitions contact: Citiz~6r(25 ,/~ Bonita, CA 91902,(619)472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor.125.com ~ t! L...... (}; ~ TO All ELECTED FEDERAl1 STATE AND lOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. !" REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS 1f1~~ -br~_ . r ~ I Co S::: 1~S' -.S j ~\lab' i\\D.'NZ '1 ~N '[ . lLv<-l \=1lAlt K ~ i'~_~ -J(3t{l-.) &J A,-t:>s lZoBHl f;f-lJl1S'T (; 6", E-MAIL SIGNATURE L- /----- t ..-- -----.! ;i For ore intormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 laoniti'l, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail www.dti.zensfor125.com 'Iv l' 'f . rS, . l ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streetsl 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtownl Otay Mesal and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%1 to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ,~(all. j ~^-L \2v-, L .:. ~/klf\ 0V\.Y'MrJ 2 / '\< .~~~ GGLr<\/A \j ~IV, ltA =tCl)~ _ &"l~' :lJ\A \. f JUAI.-- Vt.rY) fJrv,dtt 1 (tFr}1-f-'fL.- CASTJLo E(lb q)s .0 1:1> L-{CF:. ( 1<", {.(.:A / I ~ ~?t1di !1 A/~ vI > J(Jl1QJ ~ c. _ ~l\. ,o~c" VlW\(y~ lju1 .1,- l ~L" ADDRESS E-MAIL t , ) / .._^... /' / , ~j~/~j/ c::-C Lsl/c4((t.o/(/~ .t,7 era;;; ~{j k.I? / ,- / " b~ /t:- <.:.~ -" r "T I. .L....- -, For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125./ Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ,'~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STAK~~D'%%L O~;"~lS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRJ;SS. ,f'. no . ,() E-MAil SIGNATURE ~hf))l1id61'1 LtJA~ ~- ~"1~ 7.' ' (/0', - , j ( CA." \0 Lt\."" _ .\L\ \ <::::h{' S:+f l\.-t(?.- ~ r ,v < ~\ p; d: '~',Y\dcJ L ML ~ ( {-t~j,~ \ ~::j(l , I" ~1 ',( Ii [-.. ~ /) /fLt, (L.t.,.~ ,ft, , )" ~,~~~ ~-I~ '. . /: f.,/ _~-"'" 1/"'..,- _"~'~(_ ~ " ,/ /\',-1,.'"/;:' " !.. Cv ~''''> ;...1 ("" ...Li!.,J ,. '~ Ai 1 .' ) (. ' I/"'<~fi/'L-,~}'Ck, . 'etv-vV ~ ':Lt..? Y tJz/ffd'/ /A,~a .,.6 ;J h .. .' .----' For more information and petition~ contact: Citizens for 125 !lonita, eft.. 91902, (619) 472.1447, or e-mail wv",.dti<:/.:nsfor125.eo' \ IV mnm.m TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE ~Ng (~~~2~~CIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. / NAME J l -~, "':2- ~ ~(}- ~~1JlI\ 7",J. ~ --- f}/II..~_ l-/ I'" ~ L - '" ;...._..>:.~:0 L Il~Y-t4f4~ W'lJY.J /U.1 k_...-r:1 _l HdJ-r~'l<~ _ rJl-/O /4 21"Sh ~'- f!'-4//1 y?~ 7! t<i (1;;.,' .:' ',' r,'.O~_" --~_: .. > '. i {.___ ,,"'~ 1 'i""\-;U' I -, "/ '/ (\~t>V(fl'l1L- ADDRESS ~_AAAII j ( I --.l q; II. ~)' i. , '. '''' """'-(J:l-f( ..' I,',\^ I,.. \, For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfoI.125.com vV ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2- REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. _ SIGNATUR0 ~AC1J~ ~-~' lY / ~ J) NAME I~M{)l\\~ ~~DP ~~~ ~~. ~~ "9I'JVo.. I;; !a'S';//f>d )(R~~rJ J\ \C\\cVrm , 'lJ1~;;~ ~ f)/Yv'IV ).,2: l 1/ () A q,,~ J L S4." ,) _ lA_ f!i0qCCfP/l/0\ _ Cl1e(lf ( TOre, '5 )/H"-'--k - ----) /~ --')/-) 5:/.7Z:/"'J '-~ .- - y' -:~/- ,,' __ /-""~-aC::':"L'-<V'- ...;.....l.,r;:..e::: <~._:=;.; -:. (.-1.f---- (~)_ / - ,)iv)([N"fi -yOV) :;.; / )r, ~-c--'-~~_o u .~7 ,,~ -<.1 T/ '--- ,,: d...#-"' S' J l!: I" c........~ Ore $' .t> ) 'L. 11 -\ I~~. r.,..{ )"/ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com \rV~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! ;/ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 'u REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME . A~ J:.WJ hro. Gno h.RJ .." ~ ,)O,4.1C <D41Z-A U:--Yh:.JT2- r~ '~~'j fjfN 61ft V,f :pU;t ~ Ya e.ko ,~f) 11., v > ' ~ ["q nrkoi (\ '6-- ,ct <-._vela7c', (, Pc / -~---, I M\C~I.,\C'L T.:'.' C,?,t... ..! v ~OI(A(,do ANli)c'1:..>11 ~\J \ IV (~_{\ \{W -' . . -;..- I If\ p fry! ' c' I '. .'v' tn, I' !-'., ! c)NtV\,\;\I.e !flm.~ ~ SIGblATURE. . !:L r-'. '~ /1 U / lJ%L~/~~ --C:. ;t~ ;:z// y ~''";( tf ..a:~ ~~' I:'/-2~ :J t J,>< ..~. /'.- f~ t~~'.) ", d I '- (; -~ ~~l~ :< - , ~ /~/ ~4;',/C' "t"'~ C:JY ?~// ~-ZL--c>r;;' '.L'\ O(J. ./1 J / - (. . '1." ,11t '. /"::L l, (\ ',.. -.- Jt:\~~, ,,~,h\ '.'''!(\' 4 ""I ,( .1:/!{;:, ,/:pf I'll /,!;, ~,>, ! t~p) Se/~r L'~uele~ ---J f } '<-d- / (), ...~ 1';" ,.', " " 1- V . ~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 !lonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor'i25.colll ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 12.. it1 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. :IGMATUR~ '2-~ .I .'t'.! I'~ , For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citi;r.ensfor125.com -t2~ ~" ~.:,~ . j01.IJtJ{tIt lJudd _ AI YM r Itfl-<"f!!. ~ 2 _ \ S J . vV- A C2- 0-~ ~I (\r-"- 1.1 \\l6V W\l^~ 1\ cL _~-r~,r) _ ~A[~}R~ I ImiiI!J3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALr STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS I ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~^' REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS \ i""";.I ~ ,,~ -/ / " :">'1, . . J /"" - Y ""/" -,," , . ' I' .' - ~C ~ U E-MAIL SIGNATURE J.--,~ , ' , iA ., 1\'1" /ll"o,.< ,_/L,:;\ /,,'{.", .\1....i....I.~. j"...':AI, ~ ',_. \ "iJ\ C i1y.rh 25-,'"Y \ ,~ J O-c.Q~A ~ 1A<ff Q ~I(~ -r= I~ ~j~ For more information and petitions contacty citizens for 12 'i\ Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~ 6 v,~r- \/P--1,~ 3~/;;;.) /-llIfi & (l'~i /? 1/ .t>I/ (I.'~/l,'/ /! l?;J,',/,L CIP;.~:Sk;f: . /mJ _, Y(/f. _ '- )PJnlf{l,r- \ Jol~ V)!j)Y\ ~ Fe" ImiiI!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! /~ We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS CcH-mM ~ .~ ~;/I1f( ~ r".. d i' jU0>4" )y;, (,:S""d'~7 ,11//1 ti(v/A L_ ~2A Ii ~! '1 .~. ;~~~Y~f4~~f ~ K~\J~t ('~;:I' k\iOv 1,0,1/;" cU J)J/fJ I'D C, j( If 'f ~ :)~ )cAY^ ~\ \lpJ_ l1lHe/i1 !f)();?//IJ(~ . , r ..." SIGNATURE ~i;x: I.1AA.,,, "- }" de :5, d !' ':J I ./f J \ ~~~~~ \j\(S/f)j'rV,^~ C,\o/Yl'W('J~ ... -- (....) ~ - , For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ o ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. \\ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. . We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL =~~:L h ~~ ;#!-~ _ ~1~IY\a fJ<?ip'i'S -L ~ ( <--AI!.... 1 ,,~ .J( ~'p~" \ FLt'PA-r-M otJ(!.M f /,~ -f , ,- ~- " n " "."." =-1 _ (' . /L ( Il"Eff ~ ,'f"fV"Qr:~;(~RT'J',N \ I (^-1" It . <,~-f-;:.:.. For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 1~) J Bonita, CA 919()2, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com '!I ,'-- '77"/" / 77 ;I /c:.)-dl L/ Y ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL .~~ M\ ck e \ Co.\u\~_ (JUJn C.errelrD _ t/1r1A~ WM 1 ~:\ ,.(.1.., I IlI'..1 0 IV\O,\ c,I,-,C' - t t )\(.-\ ( l,k_rOt'lI{t.' Cor~Je..ro -" , ,\().." y~ 0 ~ \N/~a> ~ ?'~oJ y.,o,(ht:-1 Te~esCt \3f b ~Jr\ - . i '</)'7,-, ~ ~ ) For more InTOrmatlOn ana petitiOns contact: \,ltIzens for 125 Bonita, CA 919021 (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 7' '. ,/J':;~"'/-"':t -' \ ,.5 /'r-;/' )y0 \\ Imiir!J3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME .~ 0\)(}J ~)\:')I ADDRESS c:'~UAlI SIGNATURE. .- ~ -,,--. ';. ,/' -- ~- \. --, ,', 6 - I^"_ _ 1jVvv 'V- ,~ .--' ~ I .' If.'f I '. ' , (/ /tld~Tfi( ?i. ?}Z\ ~" \ .~, .-. '\.' - ....11::> ) ( 'f, /~. . ~ /) , (VIa YfZ1 /(:7 na...L/ /'.fj ~ ?jJ:;.9- It ~-' ~ /5 -vi L- C )J-q,y --..:. I ~,l211]rj~,--y.JA.1{ L I ~ 1/" c( '\" l) <.,.-,,' 't' ,'q ./_>' (. -:;. ..........'1/ ,..... ,..-....J- c." -.//"0. "t ' ir..&z. ! j Q/.a'~ . 2 1.,...-- :1/""-- ..')J . \ ' /. _':; (./1..0.( ) ~:.. . /)'~'7i. ~'. ", "...L~ U~ ..,~,~:~ - / ' ;fl. <y c:..J <:_ //,.7",'-/ ./.....t:::~_;;..:;.-_~'-, L._ ___ \.. ( ,'J < ~. ~ _2 _~,- ). 1"- ~ I / / ,.A L 4ft) IJ (J</ l-<!.. oj /(' ~'^" (" b, Cf?-C,'O/f'j{) I I For more information and Petition~ contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita,_ CA 919ll2, (619) 412-744'1, or e-mai! w'Nw,citizel1~for125,ccm iT/!- r ,.) .,t:""I""-::.(''^-_ ---..i:: \ \ ~ TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STA~-~ ~:r~F~tAlS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME !rlt1^j ra,,~ 0 7J IVlFLVrtJR.L 1~1L(J cl-/(-ll~ ()UE rJV f A J [ (L!I 'f / ((1 q/ J Ctnid Pn(\(( ~f\WJe100J, ,Cfn n Alexa'1drt'- aut ~ w\A d .{h ^c<J~~ : 'IO,} A. Marf{/UZ -'ar"! ~11011 G vL - ~ 'c'IVI~ " (,/'11 ,fa . 1/ WT-~' A Qt'10'J- ':2/1 i...f l11lL 10 ~.) IV D\ l~WJ- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonitil, f.A 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e..mail www.citizensfor1.l5.com SIGNATURE 'c /-;lf7~ .....~..... TO ALL elECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. 'T~ ~^' REDUCE CONGESTION 11 STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. !~ "> ... . . Il' --'Y}4- . lei ( ,I 11 ' .'.1) " I -, -----" y~~ "JrHO c )M ! 0 /'I; Ij/l- ~_ L.X_-- '1Z/3"7 ~ -);) .(;. -~ C'~ ~&~() ~9f7(( ~ >-:iL.=<[:r:~ '/() ~ CJ ~ ~' qlq/) ~l e V ell '1 #t ~7 - :-1~ - V<? _ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Ilonita, CA 91902, (6'19) 412-7447. or e-m"i1 wwwr;th~".'M'''~ ____. !?G:zt:~ -~l~ :1\-1 miiiiI!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS If REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL SIGNATURE """ -I- ~ ILl -;: AUVIl') <;\f\IIT~ 00 J~ . t7~'z, '8 , 0/.--/ ~ ) OYi7 C ~ ~ ~)J!feoNL (.!GJI{YJIljqG For n\ore i _ ___ __"__'" ....I"U.~II" lur 125 lion ita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447. or l"-mo'lil WWWrlHMn"M.n~ __... v' ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALr STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. it~ REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! tl We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL C/ Iq /I ((7>-'<. '---~""'" \ ~11(J Tcf wml~f L e../O 'i For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com \ \ ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFI~IALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. (; REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~ ADDRESS ~ If'?r)N bCf/..eF(" ~("'- ~', I ~rferrL' -I ~- \fr5X ~'"O --" L!frJ/YI'R.. RoeLlo J '. _ (M . 1/l-j);t':J-) ~ E-MAIL \ -J. ~../ 11 , ~- !. is- r/f; 'JJ:j1f-~ :~~ ~~ ~(l('l6 -S9t'tbbu " f10\.~\v.. SCJ"J()~U rr .. For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 919Q'2, (619) 472-7441, or e-mail wwvi.dtizensfm125.com to ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS, ) REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. /!ql/tJ qll REDUUE UONGESTION . tt( TOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, ~/ f APPROVE SR -125 NOW! / We the undersigned believe that: i . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAil SIGNATURE ~{;t~ - ~!j;;:~ 1// :> 't,/' -. ~ r v -- - ;' ,~ 41 · N' . JL ~~~ +{;, U'-e,)a-,:- _ ~. ..J~ ~-\~, !JI-~"~J'Wv "- Iv? rn.j P6P-eZ .d W 1'1-0, ~ 't- , ''}s' I' -'-'- 10 7- ~ For more InrormatlOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472...7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com \1> ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE ANf~~tffi~fZ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% - . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. " /1/7 .II /,~, It \ /1.I110./l.. _ ne<b fJ- Irez_ (~~ , . "'= ~-J !2- j - '!J~:-,$if~~' \ ~(, t' _ )(J,,^-';, ~ SIGNATURE cvqlCI{{..> ~k. / I ~'; ~~~ ~~ f~ --:; ~t0_ t:tW~ \ ~i~ Cj'/9/~ . - ,/'k '7r1rU: ~ III' "';~ ~, ,'~"'" . , ......:_~ -~ '......... "- ~;r;.:{ jf>Ji~c'; , 'j, !i1/0 /~tf' rl!/~~V I ',/ '.,. J'I" I)' I,ll' L' t.:t.( Lf'" ,,' " t. ' ',;J I, ' /. .'" ~-.;'i.-<-l_"'- ;6<-7 ~,' '/ NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL (\'\~\~i(V"\'S \\,.~'\\W\ ~ /l ;; '/I ' ,pt,.lv( ,,{,1, /(///14'),- 0(/ _ ' I _' ;',--/ ~- t/ .-r. .---") / /! '. ,I' . " \ " I . I. ~-f 'J) --. ". '-" ...-~ " , d.t "l!' ~,/ ~ L /t,- ,,<OJ' / !lJ.-l ri - .. \ For more i "" _.._ :F-~"'"-"'" ..........",.,........ ....H,IJ;,v;.II~ ,0f '125 I\lonita, CA 91902, (619) 472.7441, or e-roailwww.citizensfol.i.~5.com \0 -rJ:'5, H'Jc;~ ,f~5' 'q~Y ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAls ' REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS I=.MAII dol- Oil" . rJ4vJ; '" l".vrS f>~W.1\ ,..AIV"\ADN\tS 1 C ttltrLlfl fT[ 7) II 1/5 _ ~~j J ~.-- .\]V' ---;\ - \\ " - C"rl.., L--- rVV~c.,.4\....\...brtJbl frif.zfe '])eiaCnJl ,~",\;J )l!~"vl,. ~ ~.r""'\ ~h" ~ 7 1J~\U'1~,'~ ((~, I f' IT"'! I iTC" I' -1 ",ol u..~ I..z,~~{ c-}. j 9 klliJ La P['2 ( J U H fVl () etz-- '~ <, I - ~\,<:f "'L 6.r, ,~ " 7" (1111), [5>UJ1/c '" 8, For more inform'a'tion and p~titions contact: Citizens for 125 r \ Bonitn, CA 919m2,. (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www,dtizensfor125,l:om J '7" (~), 7'f:/ g::;zj~</ \J ImmI TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFIciALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL - NAME ADDRESS _~ ~ i VV'^"y CJNrI~if- ~v- c, ::,,, .,'\1- '- _ ~~~ j ~vr~~c-0 i , '--- U1 . .'1 . (~I t ',a /.,. u~"":. h ,t", fr I'" / 1.-" - ~~-- }foflillA1!. -( (:fJ1 ,j-QIj6( . t'lt-l) - x J~0 fv-\ \If/I.l tl ~ /)(;J)Cfhf;/;IO m )~i)e \ \~'2- .-: ~~ .. ~ 1Jtr~1';; ~j: 2 f"L .lmdlQi Bqll tldq Cf; q %0 C h'i r I tilt b~v.( IIfr is :-~ (.}t 13 C) For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ,15 ) ~ ?/5~H9" /\; ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE ANDh LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~.,,~ 1/914-- ~ -f" , \ 4 \ b \r1 VI 'Mo\ \\ ~1lh ld ! J3r\~ t-! i \L J::l ,) S/;,WMi IJI/tvN;J !t L, / / I d~ 8el-n Af;e- 'A4/'..A7~ 1:V'j'i"/" , "'. I " 'I L . - j'" .,. '( /"";-/1' t ! I) kYl ;; For more ir __ ~_...._... ~v"...'-" ..mzens Tor 125 !lonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ ~ TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! c) " We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E.MAIL SIGNATURE r- '11':tcp' ) <;v' q ,q'1. ~~ ~ <JlJ~ I(?AcJL jt/LtJmtf _ C V' ,J'~ '17k---, ./ ') _____, I 'j- _n ~ q~/ /''-+ : d/ ~~i ~ .(J,e ~ //1.-..,- " -, For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 BOl1ita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor1\25.com ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. !/tl/J ;/ REDUCE CONGESTION :/ TOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. /': I 'f "~~ l~~ ~~ NAME ADDRESS c~, ~.r~ u^"\O ~M ~ ._,. "n. ~I tf(lr~ ~r, ~ ('\~ r~. L ~ V' ~, J J DAllfer ./A{l({-<4 E-MAIL . . --1 ,o;;::.(?~,.,(/ '\?IiO.r< t2l:r /~i 7~ ___ \ "J/L.- .(-/i-,;{~ I 811~ f;~'- For mor . ,for 125 llclI1ita, CA 'ln902, (619) 412-744-1, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ! , ! , {M:)1)no CoboS JC\~' -.1 \~ r A 1--./1 ( \"1 t:<' ".. ) '--,,' I ,(' t 1._ "dO. ""', ',_.~/'" _....:7' _ )(l.cY~~ ___~ CIL\(iZ o ~",".". ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. 1 REDUUEUONGESTION TOP GOVERNMENT DELAY APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. , (i /f!:iMAME ' ) '( L'01tf' ~"........,.f ~ ~ DiJ#'~~ fGA R /Ii --::~. I~' JJ j L. '.~ f\tA ~ A tt.. l\1 ,J, i>1 i)f~A l1Vtv'lltJbVfl ..J fl.>tA"'5 .J, Tef\fV' -& E jI/ [ fJ I HI^- (PI-lit C H!}! L 6 I3rHfft 11' / ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGMATURE e (, -'"-~ f!tJ/~2 NJelf/l tV C, ~ h I ~~ __t:=- ~;:>~ C) ~ au-, rl, ~1l' rf. -=It- ' ,; ("~(;C~ ~ ;;;;}.~- ,,v './ ~_..- ... ') ~ "I' ,,'--;. "11,:'\ ~ ~J,,,,.<, '''~J Si If (05 UD(. ' ( .. f;/t{j,~~ ft,'it !9~Q '~ ,tJ;_ ~:~ ~.. ~__ ~i/3 t~~~~ t' [ l . For ~Ot" II11ormanon and petitibfls co~tact: Ci~f~ens for 12~ .. Bomtll, tA 91902, (619) 47~1.1447, [)r ~.mill! WWW.cltl:t~!lSforHl:..com 4 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS , REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. fJt(Af~ REDUCE CONGESTION i7!~r S OP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS F_MAII 4:J /) ~GNATU~ " ~J 1:t:tt: i::Lk ~ MMiv-e1 pttkzrzt4 t \ (lint; -Clfrfl'on-q _ 'A~ . ,re e KhC,tly;.b -' ArJ4 S{(2vel~ ~~ <OJ ~ 'Lv- i t!. 1 / , ~/U!'.-<., ~) (J..-I ,~1){ /jU~.-j _/ujr~~J1 ~ ~---,... ~ - - - - For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Iloniw, ('A 91902, (619) 412-7441, or e-.mail www.citizensfor125.com q I:fiiiiI!M TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, ~~~;:roU:~~ICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. r9t11""",,,," vVl"""t> ,#Hr"/f &/RLU~ !?e.Aa> we if:' y,&-~ \. jA-lW'A/ 'i~~r.; ~ -a',. J ADDRESS E-MAIL h l....tD_...I If r ., .:: .-' Lv\VlUf11\ W\'\l'V1( I ':/-k"-Xv'4 I - tf I a.:PliL ~~\~~ -~ -- .- For more ...,...",,","VII cmo petitions contact: Citizens for 125 !loniUl, CA 91902, (619) 472-1441, or e-mail wW'i'I.citizensfor125.<:om Imiir!I9 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 4 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. q ~ REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. N).ME .~ ADDRESS ( /; j; I ~ - ,/ /1 > -(!;'Y Y(/ / ::d;" 4: ,,,; ,'> ) !' \ . \. '\ /)\' J-X--\- J \ ( 0 _. ~.-. . ',- E-MAIL SIGNATURE ) (,"i - ,./2/,' I _-.''. f~"-" ) /},/"I,7Cr> _4c~". ,c_.f;~'c?~~) . I -t ? /: - I _ i:," _ ./',.' [/<1/<1/ ( //J},1.jj!k(l r lX/fliP, ~u ('f C)(J-r"\. C 0. qr/q~ , )~^~jl < ~ ('Qj( 111 fP -f1 .Yf.iy -.? (2.... -=::: sf 1tf8. 1/ '1 (r(( _A,~" 16 miiiI!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAl, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS . , REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ;jttJ1P&(It() q~ REDUUE UONGESTION . 3t> P GOVERNMENT DELAYS 11! lPPROVE SR-125 NOW! ' e the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE (A ~l'-'.i..v.-. ~ -1.~' t. 4/1>,~c_ 'U /.'-"/v' ~C _'--:7.~ _ .' ^~(./I~'T' -~;::..-~~-~"'" I , doonrfbr /11ornJ'XVrL 0 . '-~_ (7A.. -'->- < '..BeHi .fcAh3ICl'r~hu.0 C',..';~yy GtG.. \ ~\_ , I\\N&c'L, , '" 111 i~_,.,.., ,; ,_. <--1 R~L-cnJ~) / -e, J. ." ../, "- 2 ? /,- .-','7 -1;- //./ .... '/. _ l .-i. "../c', _.4 '-L:.,. '/--:;'A</~ ;,// ,f :"j->-- For more Inrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125/ . Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor'125.cotn q ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE '1 ~. ]l'in ~~ :~:~ c)~~~L~': rl)I'Lj rf;.. ?/J -rA-u/;;P{ (/ /"'. V ), - ,,-) -"7 " f ' ~~{/.<< /11/;(>--<" " ~~ j -:j~ 1)"'\/I~ IN r It! " -' O/:;~ R,;;/6~~ 1:J ,~~ \~o \o\"",,.}. . y. r- L,C., e. ( .-' Cfi'1*) ( i7 ., . (l, t.:\ ~ 1. v , 4" "', .'iI. >'-~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. Hi/JIl ql/U REDUCE CONGESTION ' Jpr S OP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL ~ - t\ W \J\.ort1/V\ - ~ v&1 1/ ' - ~ ~ >-. {IN . l}LI~J,;~, A<l.iZ ,~-.---:: -~/;: ~~c~""J: - ? c: /(~( U1~ '~D~ Ilrl.v"... ~ M.~~ if'"'"N' ~~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 I Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mai~ www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. flll~~) '1/J I @ REDUCE CONGESTION il) STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL ./ SIGNATURE ~~-~~ :;;:~ 1 - ~:.o...\..Y"OI""~1, (V\jI)lt,~{t~ o35(J,lCll'l ~\;.oo "C. () ~ ,'" For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, (A 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor12S.com 1 / Yj /7-=' y r~:;:s ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STAfE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS;) REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtownl Otay Mesal and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%1 to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL , SIGNATURE 1lS~ ~\ -~\:, .J..h\ , ~ ---- \'\S~, ~tI.'1 6/() ~t.L.L/ --- J' .A.-'~~' ,~r i- \\~ ,---,,2~~1.. ,~-- " _~"riZJ (<__" ~ "T ~~ w , ~''-I(' ;t.,,,!,,' :-:r~'0<; ~~ L- 4f'~ ',' ~ .- 4J,j ~ to ~ 1-5 ]14\0 . " ~011dl t\ ('e (e~IA ''$s~f/'" Pr,/?IY(/1 ,1A~vA"', 1"~ ; I V 1l~~<1\ t'l\\""'l ~1l11t..C ~.~ ~_\\\ rL l qk;-= ' /). .' Ci 't'-j /" -lv'~ A<:.....;,-". ,:/.0 ""fr!L-I-~/~ . ,,' 'i~\q ~:= ' f ,,! , -_~~: . if,.;';/"l; ,( ~^' < - For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ItM A) 6f //1/ :f REDUCE CONGESTION Jtr STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME f7 ~jCMi1:cK~l~ ~or(}..'f\ D\e\-L.. I~-"~~~ . ~Dr-<~Q2\k, ( i """11" -'~ ' '""/\ v~ ~ ~ \ VI iA \V\~() :4 v.~ P-"'"1' J~ J~~il:11 ;~' ~ \ .\. Ii -~~ ADDRESS E-MAIL " . _."'" \ "- ____v....,'-.o/ - 11. ern' J / - .f/! ~-.//"/fl ~ -~~~ ~... ~/ "-"'""". c For mor_ "".......uuUVlI allU "'~lIl1un:s contact: L.ltlzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizl>.nsfor125.com ~/ Imiir!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS, . ~ REDUUEEPUONGESTION' fI;~~'c STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL _ '1 ~ For more ........IIIIU\,IVI. O,IY "'1G."n.IVII~ \.VIIUJ...."~ \o.IUL,,"II:) lor 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 1 '. :....... [I V ,7~5 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND L&=AL OFFICIALS ., REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL ~f~ ~ '-' --f!"-.", ___'" s~(-"1/~;/ - LA:./' /J(JAARiJ t.(. V.s76\)(DD. Z. J;o [e9P'b (,) C.}1 J ~. ,Si. ,..' \r; .J I ~;?:~ '/, >', /', ,_/ c(.;..~r, j ;(.__ " <. _ ,~ , ---------- .?-.. ...1-, 4\,cy -~~--=-. ?..-'-' ./. "J"1 q .~/i/ /~: )-,....~__ 4.-' ~~.ll- .~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447. ""'_m,,;1 unmu .,,,____<. ___ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 7 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~<\ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT BELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~~~-~~ () Ii/.; 1/1 Il IJrl-h.- fl:;J?lI(V Q~ s Mell nett:! CUI mCL S I! (1P(;; /( 41.d S ~~~4~~ C'KJ{O \H~~U'(\u _ E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~1t'?IO ~ 'll ?> '1Z(fr I IC(/ / , ,. For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 1205 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail WWWr;th"n'~M.n. _. <~' ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. b REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streetsl 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtownl Otay Mesal and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%1 to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME 1fe!/?t,)/lJr;{i; /Y{/7 i ( -o~~~~-l\l>Q",," j ) I .J*= w il \ 'i'1. ,~1 L elFn -----, ). I", () '\ j , /\I(;rC{f1f-/t _ ,,' }t f ~ e~11t(/i1./h_ ADDRESS 7'/C) 0/:::;- E-MAIL (~ (iY70.(( \ For more "'","'''''dllon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail v/ww.citizensfol.125.com rm:ii:m TO All ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. .); REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. AME ADDRESS 5i/fP A7l/p Jf,>)- - G E-MAIL ~URE ~~r, ../~~ c.-,Q)" - ~l'~{;'~ 1 ..J A-Vl v~ LDE Z 2< JtI Sh,rV- (;) ~:/if~J r( '1- , .:JL 7U. . C~0tClrc;~~ - v ---.!JA q{qlS- ,. For more inrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail www_citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ilulf~/r~ f; REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS _ , . .._ V~~'. '1-eAtUcv _ ~ Yd.", N;~ ~ ~z:;(~rz:~~ ;;;:;'lrLi<-t{~;:;7{J/l 1''''''--- _ E-MAIL ~ Je ~c;JJkur;) "'cAI~J J) ;('1{j) $^~ ~/ 1(1o;J, , yurt I, I.c- < A{ ~ ~ (v{Jt~"-'<<'-(50-? L~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ?; ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS .:/ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS l;/",,, /;_ )~/1/Z /, q,W !. / I ,/ ~ ~~C:71<vp4t-j ~I I' '7 I E .1:.- 5' co? {,_ ".-.A F_MAll SIGNATURE ~ ?d~.h Zr ~fdonr4-j~ ~f ~<=( .,k~c",J}- / For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for -125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com t) " ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ~ y) lC\"7{ 1 h~~I)IL/) 9()J('{\ ~- ~~ '1 (~~-N ')d:,P(' ................... SIGNATURE \I~~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS-3 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. )h0- REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE sa -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL , _h '(A ~c\(l YY\ S ,- ~ ~h\"'A ~,^,,\\.:>_ ;! Q.\V, For more mrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com vf/ /}'c/ ',/,/.; ,~), m:m:3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE r.t '1tu ..0 'S-I: ..,;,r~ ~ rlq(~~~;;/-=:=> -~5t:> y4riJL ~lC-\~ ) flF (J(?TI .. For mo,.. ""VI ",,,,"VII dllO p~tItlons contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com y ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~~vGWC mhtZ-lj ~ E-MAIL SIG R / _.~// For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ \~ . . ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DEL, YS, . APPROVE SR-125 ,NO ! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San biego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay \ Mesa reduced by 75% .. . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by\' government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ) i ",-lOIlA/ ~;(I/I1,e) f ADDRESS / E-MAIL / _______ Ii .kIL'1 .. ~~i\ . 'f>. .. ~=- --:::r. ::y p ,..., 1;..fotJ'v..) <Z ~ " ~: "'2 ~... ! . '., ~. For more i _...._~._.. u...... ..,~"I"IVIl5 ,-ulllaa: \.Itlzens for 12 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472.7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com o SctV1111 G'fo ~ tC/?II-/fdJA-TJla//III?-- TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. \I)y REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! .-- We the undersigned believe that: , . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce. traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown', Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~~1~2 . ~,~~. /l}c-< ~TfVE m::- /, ~;;:I .~ JM <;;;2 61:( · - , ,. -.- F~MAII ,- /1J . k-t3.Jrt.. ~~0 q'~D" , Fo more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ADDRESS.. I. 1- ~1j . TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diegb.$egional Transportation plan. \ . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. j We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected \ officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. _.^ E-MAIL 9'0:2 lit! ~ 'YtIt.."OY'l' ~ \'lAME ~ < / c ~ - '" , ~ t . ;; c --' ~\{ ~O/V" c r ,,~ \ C\-} '''" - ......../ For more infb'rmation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 ) Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com -c~_ 7--17 I IV tk- ~ ' I ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS \Iy REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. SIGNATURE p~;~w utiArrg- ~~ 4.f CPl ' 9'1'177 ISO o ADDRESS 11-. 1\.1.- E-MAil ~ ~ A ~lqr. ' rd./" . 11150 ~~(,Iti a/j/~ ) boAJ AJ "'<'~G/J!J ,,/'/1'1 vllcI-, ell, /f'l ~ d-~e II' ...-/1 /_~ L__ ::,:i-.~ F--J\..~~ ~~ ~~.~1; For marl:: IIlTormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~\'1:> ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! , We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Down~own, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL '1116-::l- 7\( All Al /r / ~/<---.. ~ , For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ( . - 'i Jol24lLM f/rZI4 61^_ .JSv<;;<; i f \ ~'Jf . ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS :/4 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be ~educed by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME j .,'1 SIGNATURE '" 4;:;m\tJ:;W/~ p~rY\ D;v~ fit 12-1 G' Q..r"'-"'-, (] 'Mly. */)>( '~ /~ ~~ - ~ I>i~~ ;~ b6le- ~jr?;; J J L '" ,......,.....\.,.-V' )-fUV~YJ J~2, ,'. (J (\ I I! ~ (\ 9(~'2~/hf-;;tt W I C1 1/<jJ LfJ-l! ,/7 'I}- qy*{)~ e _ lff:; ~n~J , ff9tl - '~ I e ~ d'/.~.d~ ,a:,.-'lt) '( AL.:\6\.~ "\ Sf6 /[I..j '41 1/213q. wJ(<t,'l'1-Yo -- ... fI ~ 1/ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2- (tr REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL i.{_ "alA SIGNATURE " (7?^- J ~_' "'~__J ~..;e::~ ~A€.~-<>.~/ ~.~~~ ? tilL- I 13 ~ .lJ ~~~;;.., ~ j)JJTo JJ ,,, CI'.tf'4C~~~ ~h~ ~ ~ A' B I P f: 0.-(; 1:;-; 't ~CH /Y/VvQ'(bu..-- ~ .-ptoNu.el~ ~plfrhY.~ ~('~PGJJA ~ jJlt! ~ G )-~c.o ~ _ /W/./j ~LD i:~~;>::4/!::/~r t -J~~~<c /'Ifr.dcr (( C< M UNo Z rJl;--z:42> ~-n?;3 ~_ Ife. u ~ ',c$lVll; s 9d//y'- f!!t:!~ . For more infor! ._..~ ~v"Ldct: Citizens for 125 '<'(J""-<-~-<...( Bonita, CA 91902, (019) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com j TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS :3;J ,S;- , .. ,....'Il.. E-MAIL SIGNATURE /'-'t :c.<L tl{~ JD<'1/t ~1fLA>_17,:_ 1-. (c) (JUhM,('iJ/'1Il 02/ /)/JIlPcYUI--t.- ~_ ), II 17 ., , ',' /IJ -/'77 "/,, h,,' ' .~ 7:T! , , --> {I' e?/ \ / 01t-1~/ /11 "?V< ( (JW1.0AJ 'f ~ 'iit?-h,..<''' ' (' _.._.------...~ /"},,""---/"' ,0.'7/1/ Pl?Tefi>-[Jv-:$ ,--> -<f:1J;7' A'-; ~ ---' 'J / ,1'// (;,'''' /" '- M L I L J. /., ! r \ ;1 \- /2:' ,_.'/ ~J1,'1 !IJ,cil~,c_ 'r!e--f0YS-~(jVII ,/IU iffLJ/;./ (j(,,;-'i'-Lf For more Ii1TOrmatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 12 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com "/ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE r:::jC7! .' 1/ ( .-i \ --- ~O~~\ HEJ-f:.rI ~)13/)J "- \~~#TiiN. ~STR::~ \.",.... R~"",~ ~ ~. EON E I D'F: I ~I i)DHmt J r--! : c: rj n (/.. /)1 i ~. c) 11 ,. /-f A U~f FA'll For more information and petitions contact: !.ltIzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor.125.com C 1 ...,. . ,7 Yf: ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALt STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS \, '17 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! L We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected V officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. /' NAME Ann.ccc SIGNATUR~_.'/~~ -;'ozt/Vo ~:... ,,' ~t~ --c:; A ffi [h~ ~~ ~(X)l [J!wqvcf t'rtJ7Vcl/J L[~ 1) PF' NUf(~ El_.( , () ? /-:7' ) ~ EYI!{;.!&r(Jaadez dL 4i;;~;; Z~ ~ :S-W~\X~ \\\J<\(\ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 0' t" . ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! . ) ~.. We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS F_MAlI - ~ t<~~:~ 1:~'/iU \ft:I~~ ~. S,,}i.. E. ~'e'L U ~ ~I'- l~ Yeu V\N~ ~~ !r:a~ · r~~ rN/vw ~'~~ /:iJi1f H(J T' 7 "C.\:;Af-J)) ::,I\,-J7"- ~_ \ \__~ (A For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902., (619) 472-1441, or e-mail www.dtilensfor125.com yf 41>. o TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. 2 REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~ NAME ADDRESS 'iiI ~es. j!AU 7< " 4~ ~~v. " E-MAIL ~URE 'C/5 ~~ ~I' ~ ~~. ,,~~~ } ~ tr917 f\.to r; V\ . aU/eoul f1(TlY _ \ I. \J r rT10crc /tv/\! M.rc Lc::+': 1/97') ~ I ".1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS.::lf J REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. -- -~~- E-MAIL ~-/3 ~ ..." <i-iS- (5 SIGNATURE $ ~~, tJv~ 1L ~f1 // c/-^ / ;.. d. NAME P nnD~c:.c:. " c::::' I " _ (, 0.,(\'\01\ ..)I~---' ~Jt., It fl-c;A c;.- CI c//( 1. ~ ~l ;L~ I I f.10e S ) !Cf I tW- (/ J ... ~;, J 1"1 8 -:-L LJJ &,J)(~) -!!::t:- ~ 5u S/l1I/ "(I1'.J~ . qmt Fat:! ore information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Ronita. CA 91902. (619) 412-7441. or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com rrr~ ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. - till H3 REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~_ ..;vo e;-13 >l-h.. q-/s-tfd NAME ADDRESS _E-MAIL S~ 1lR;V()~P i1-,,-".2er- I ~- ~ @k-~/-~ ~-""--~ =::::L~ . ~rJd ao/-<!6n1 ~ '5- , l \' ~ 1 :1 II 11 if' .t. il Ii :1 '1'// ;" ~'~M \<:::;'C"~'AP- t.Vdf\furo ~~" y ~ ~ht7 For mUI~ IWUlI!ldUVn "lUlU IJfGlIUUII:t ,,-UlIl.dLl; ....II,ILt::ns for 125 Ilonit'l_ CA 91902. (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ t ~ ImiiI!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAl, STATE At-lD LOCAL OFFICIA.:;'3 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. i___ '7 v<:' / ~" /::'),'.~)~'7'- - T'lJ -. ~ , id'l L tZ~ /(1' 1/' r NAME ADDRESS Jjiii/!U'i<. -'j 16 ?'fU (;) J %:0 '/i~ ~{. fJ ~~M . L '} 1/ e?\-e~rJ'_ r.fti ~.) l' t." ,~ I t I.d. Li... _ J L~^-lf! .Jf~5LL~1 I~SlL.S; " (-Q Jt\L:/' '-.',') P, ~. 1::\' .-' ~. (')~('-<""f"1 - ............ ',. \../. \," .-.V -4 A ~ E-MAIL , - :) , ~W;k~'2 . '; ~'~ .A ~:;~-:t~tff#/B -.L.Jl-1A I"tL UI ( &-~ . !iij, For more ""'."matIOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for'125 ISonita, CA 91909., (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com L..--I ~l~ ~3 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS :Sk.Q1" ~Yl.JL~;& ~ '-'f .AJv\' II -:;;~ J<h E-MAIL SIGNATURE 1 "l f .- 'i/J . .., - l ~ . i,.f'~- eft.,,((tlt1' pt:.,.;L. ~ / 7 <: ._, / \0<- I / }/,;I/:I- ) ~! / ::~JZ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 v' Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail w\./w.dtizensfor125.com i ) , -, JtPq /07 ST.,,/~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to.,Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for .ars. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL SIGNATURE ltMv (lJa-tzL, - j~fbP}JOA~ l 'S<-xtrv.lA"'(/ ~fYY\1K .~ }J ~.~ :T7tN'I"<:" .M~5r?,r.) l ~ t!< . -.. n - . b + :":,.M\ c1-c ().. . ~~ -5/ Love '_~ ~:t\O , r.'!\ ,\ . 'fl'/' 'JohL_h"J::~llCl\) 11) c, For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com " [7 if7f pi7<5~_ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~!tf ~~ UJ\((~ E-MAIL SIGNATURE 12 Vti\ \I\\cW\L I ,~L I q2~e-;'{) ~-:j~Q;7- _ [',rr ' l,-b'Ln~'t, M 4^",1;,<1 Ihelt:l i'llJ ~1fl,'1 (i{/{( s+r~0AIC4'l~ ~~"\A\.~ ,.,-,-,ee{ 7~ L( ,;v*v- f).' (' f Ij. II 't,(I'), .. ~., \/.,/..1\.." I~ \.,/-- .' _,U'- ::) I 1 , U-)~ if" L~ . (._t-' ~<>'~/ /"l j.u;. oz ) ) "l" : '1 ,f ~,,//' 1- -'be For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com \11b ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2- REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS cJvlSCinc, 0on7Uilpz t',:l'~AIV/c7lA./ ~+<I -' i ~&\rah l;\.1f7^J 1 J~(~. .R!IT.tJ4 AR!tc()~ , \ uSc'Y\\'" c ~~"s) [\JA0{':j r~\\" IA J A<)(~r( c L '7~~ Lvf"2 L !i 31 E-MAIL _~4~; ,~. . fr/(I ~ - ~ r)e c-d t-f 0 I U, . \ For more illl.....llIIO'l.IVIl allU ~~11t10nS contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com )> ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS I) REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. jltJttN a-ttd REDUCE CONGESTION tt~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 1 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e..mail www.citizensfor125.com Z-} ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ;/I/JtJ {jtto REDUCE CONGESTION dL~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! J) We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS J;~Ic;.,~ · J . To.) ~ LI4.&("!J HQriCtYm(D~~SL _ , E-MAIL ~ ~ ~~ /0 I{ qf~ 1[0 <if 7ft' fiLM /{b{.,l.- /1 I ~~ 7;;. (1c'-o/{_ i2 11/ L 1;- ft. e~(t.-t1:or more II IIV'IIIlQ"IVII CUIU pt:uuons contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 9190!2, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. flql"i flu v REDUCE CONGESTION di) STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! 2~ !5 We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL ~,~ ~f"- w t"~, q/~ Ir ~13 'Y,--c / I- -----~ NAME 'lIAr! h;,fVlde. -- (~t.'-" 'C;- 5/ ((3 ~+ - For mor" "I/U"I/dUOn ana petitiOns contact: (;Itlzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail v!ww.citizensfor125.com A; I} ~ TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. j/ilt1i /{uJ REDUCE CONGESTION ~.~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is .approved and built without further delay. a;~ p~ I ~ -1 ADDRESS E-MAIL ~URE. /. 17M, Fri? ~ -'----~~ ~-hr'119/} ~ h' ~ 0.. )-'---_) 0,eJ\'t~ Du-:sv,ore /9 ~7 G.".' -1 ijJ - - __ C;.JJ'r"'Y -- ::A Cf;qlTi ( R._.<' ) l-\b.- Jt..J;:t, ...L MffA)~DS. (AO j ~ J\ \\ L "'-))(} l, ) ....i Ri(0Dt.Y !)\CV<MA,-,J --.12 . For more inrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I> ~':: ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS .:1'1 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. flMU 6;u J REDUCE CONGESTION J1S STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E.MAll SIGNA.TURE d'h;; yYG~ J~.. T~z-- o r('J w\t\/ W ~a YI 2",ttM~ . . ~fJJ1~ -j~c9f JY\att N\o let 1\ ~~i:~ ,-SaM\' Q. fY\0lQ\ e s ~~ ~ZWj.1t . [VVJ,bt./f- () ~.~~n(A;) (A A~TJL&/M~ 'Ii/( (:> ~~1--JAtI'-f:~r- .- t/ nat1 pe; For me S for 1 Bonita, CA Yl'1UIl, (01'/) 4/1l-/44/, or e-mail www.cmzensfor1 IDiii[!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALl mJJ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. !f1f11'/","- REDUCE CONGESTION ::- STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS,?', APPROVE SR-125 NOW! '1 I} We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected +- officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~:;fi{~~~ 3k~~~ ~F ~~[), C~ArZIt!t /(,1/....<.,- t..- It/(J jI' (--., I- j ,',' (j'r2!iJo 100 1E1\V~' (-)r 'f"""C Q ~ l' '"1''''' '4, ('(1')'<: !, Tt, ')"" I.' 1'. II L ) --r\,! -'(~V~ t h' e1ldlilJ~ ''''>/,,11' (' ),'" 'c' . '- i.!.' I-{ jf:~14- ,~' _ E.MAll , ~S, k" \ , 1\\X\"hh. ,". \' \ " . \ ..,. I" ( \~r t{' 2 c'./' ~ J..c..-i~- ( , 0<.! .y' ~>, ~ '~ ' ~ ~',<'/ >(>->- ' . \'", , , ~" I \" ;i.I'rlC: .' ',- fL" For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~/ ~ TO All ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFF'CJ~ /2., REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. firM ~b I} REDUCE CONGESTION 115 STOP GOVERNMENT BELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS "..J;,,,, E-MAIL SIGNATURE. I. ..;/ J' 1(1< I JZi}-- -.' ~yU/e (aM ,. '/~'I"-"'-,/.~d_'><--.':...... /r. ~ _ l'r({"[/V I' /~ .. d Y\A.~/) {I'l0+- ' ~/ ~_ ,. ~r--}fl.;t. -FN(I,--.-- -'-'--!...\ ' /'i/ 'I, ( ',J "/- .-'-\ , Lf -' "'1' .', / ' I;);~/th-l [I fe' rr~lii_, ' AL/;;:,\ANJJRO (~L.(-rf fei1:'Z , M>.Il {:oJ ,h ::;;<10/ -1 ,.::5lfRlColi/ f{Jk-jo _ ..- , ,\' 'II \' '---On{'(U, II ('rd;;:-"" ---L ._~____ .J . , , '7/," !, - 'P'{'(&Ju, /,' ;) IS l'l1..o ~( I' yt; .J oJ0 :&1...- L- For more in 1<,'" ",,,"on ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 ~o!1ita, eA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor1!1S.com -6 , Imm3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~,fpj .(!YJ REDUCE CONGESTION ~t STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! I} We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. , We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAil r ~ "qlt! . C'f/Ci) '/3 U!L il9lS '-- JJ~ ~. ~l~L ;r;" :#9.1\ s _~t~ _.<~ NAME ADDRESS -f(OAt\a D A,~ ~ Me-Lcd ~ f'-{>l'v(2So'"\_ USA. V~ if;;tk~ /~:~- ~u.r{l (Y/. /IiI! -' A-J L ~ uU'lL4d ~ ..J ~ L t\ '1\3 I~ .- S ---t For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 BOl1ita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com s TO All elECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFlPALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. 1/tiA-rU ~l{ b REDUCE CONGESTION :ft~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! [3 We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS (7 4-:/1 ~~ 14 fI-t;( ~ ~LlJ oJ " Jv7A/!-K- f})V kJ7t~ _ E-MAIL SIGNATURE "'~ '" J ,. 2 ----W E' &I/:} I /I P1 /T L <,.)I:-Y2sPrJ rlN/J,e1-dc ~ ~n~ 8nrz~ ~ ~vl-/ _oeJEL . For more lI!formatlOn and petitionS'contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com xr' ?t6 . TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E.MAIL SIGNATURE 1r~ ??~d4~ 1t&f#~~~ \/ - / ..~1' ~l!f.. -Yl1iJJ&t {)eJ1l~l , I ~ :5_""h /VIg.r-(,~"L ~/ &z.,~, cnvlJhClI1 fuiz ~ c:~ IQ :J;~\ML5 ~ (~ \. ,'\- \' )' " ' I ,',SUr ,J ,. /,,\ "- ) '-'i \\.... ." f)Jv"-M. I:>"">'t" '\ (:-A120l'1l~ tCIF For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Ilonita, CA 91902, (6'19) "'72-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.C<lm J ", /J - \ ~ JI,{ Imiir!I3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. /f6;Ai...",- REDUUE UONGESTION 5'~Ja~~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! ~3 We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E.MAII SIGNATURE . 'I, L.~ ~ ,Cjl,lj ~J I '~ "Jbc'{ 11~ ~', It, " "e\f, ~,\" \)\",v-r--' V Ii --\"-_l) !~ '\~"'0;:"~~'~~ ~~ hU II J !l. ~ {: i{? f' - ( i. ')t\ \ "'-\1 Tn,J (r AJ A:.J,~_ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com eft ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS /3 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION 1:;:::::- STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL ~J -ry " ~. .. f,l. i ").\ I" \",,: .~ CJ::\ 120 L... L" efIl{f1 )YJj\ \ I" /' (/ ~L~ ;111 I \UJ! \ > . / '. .11 . I : !) ,), crl c/ i I I. Ci>i)' 'Il I ~'.-).".' ---' -- ./ _/ {/ ,..IV For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS) 3 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. Ai, .-ce4,,___ REDUUE UONGESTION S"Jq?vV STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. SLLl:. r:, t:" . /) fV1) AU Q lOt: 0\ I u z. , (3t:',;,j .~;tv I~ l rL / g L2 Jf(AU _~ J. Awl rdZ . J/J g Eff I r{, Ha b 6/tV5 ') {J..G< ">(, -" dp 7 'Ie; . >- ~ '0:.::> ~~ e/" . ~~1J~' I '~~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com \~ ~~~8) [1/ ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDEAA( STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS l Y. REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, . APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE .-.~.--- - -.- . j!Zdt?,,]t( ~! vv( -~6l] ~ -1 ~."" iJEJ) ,1/. ~~ . . /t~~_\ -or 1C"\^ e /v, Sd-4-l f>' 4/~ (M.II I'ormoreir. "12$ .... l/'7// !lonitil, CA 919ll2. (619) 4:m.1441, or e..mail WW'N.dtizensfor125.~__ Hi 1t.?t!t: . , Z .~ . G fIE-0 t!fT611- / / \\1\ IDiiiI!I3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: , · The construction of SR 125 South i~ a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. I . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL , : <JL- 0/1 /1t- rtt r: ~\~~c /Jd ~----- ~~~~-~f}=~ I a;~.1. ----~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~l . , i , ImiiI!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME Jo6d/l J &-~ K~Me->;eJ~ 'k;t 5k'M~ 1~ ;;):'6RA-Y MI'IJ'/aAld L t!lta.h(}f _~d<. -e;. ~ -.- Je:tj-\ u..-S>\/-Il Nf;[S~ ~OUN _11~ 0~ 1 pzh . I..\.v~ ~/tJHiVl()T o \J ADDRESS E-MAil ~ {'so u",' b1fiJ .~ ~~;,J ".I~f Ni . - ei-4 "Dr /d.e. J. .~.~ '(' e ra.A."If./\ 1. >1<.''1 f) O'two . 1UO. WI'1 ~ e ~rr1.aJH1 !.fb~.~ ? pbw.r/J .t..., J7bwriq.tiW{ ~d.wJ -- ---1 r"^G() LAo!_ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ l.UD\......J~. L1"1Vlo--, 'T~ k~i TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE Mcmf,ew :r. 0J:J .' ~~ ~1'~~~ ~ LJ)J.L {h~CiJa;,~~ Stn~ ('fl- 7~,,1 ~ Yi~hn tin iYAlYiJJ/J A!JmltlJ UOl"htMtinl $tya~ ~~ Gorcid/l KLfA. to ~'" be,,.y G~... IltuCIYJd.C.""; ~~.?~ ~:>f' ,.Y'j~ /)1.... ~ b~.~ ~.v-,lZ,..<-t.,).~ Lc,,,,-,,@ ~ I ( '.-P l.0 . co"" ~crro' ' ",'-:-1z-<-"'---^- ~\u~ ~ ~~..Cfitf"\ . ) 'iil fb..:>a-J,{l < r(j f"'J;W~ ~~IJM'- I. I pbwov~.(()vY\ ,if";' .y~ MiH.l)~la&Il.lId ~ ~,b".~::: ~ lI'.,,@'l ~"I\,/l....L_ __~ For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ~ 0m-"~ ADDRESS E-MAIL S IGHATURE rz. VSod..v..f- /1//7<""'/ ~.<;y'/"",:; ~,#if/.I?/Y #/0I..4/~ (Yo' ~8eVl SIAs,o,n ~\.VI2-Y.s. ~f1\ fV~G€ ~~ f<~ 'M ()\~.;~~'fI'N"\'<I ~~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com mliiI!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% ' . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE M \~ - 'E::R."iAN ~~lB ~~ J J.1\tJJ.. Iv\.. ~/I<::r()(Z.. ,Ci/ez. y~) C, I//I-,~ ~~' J1 ~ /'? :)c-%c.. (;1w'V) ~l~~ $tv4'i)r;- . ~ oJ ,~ 5~~ c..al<.V~~ w""- 6~;l-Q.'t c-' L' ab ~l'_L-<-1:-'}1 ()/C1.IJV',fCl (}jllJJ)~1X' _ ...11 '1" ' . I' rkFP IJ./f!ft/(f)-0 fjffilll:t<-- For mo~~ II !I VI lllaUVII allY t-'~U"'VIl;) '-VIlr.a\.I.. '-II,ILIG:II:) for 125 .. I Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com olif.Ql.'Y\ iWa~ <U>(~ C- CL 0 n-LI.. 'f/, , i?~'.."oo .?I-J : c,-S -cJll1 ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay '"'" / Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. >( UK ~ ' ,~ ~ ,~~f /) ~" dt. II / ~ .' I- l/ " Ii':/. j vf (' /1,-( \ .~ :"#" LS ~~~ 'CfIr7o'Z- 'C- ~~ J1.~ FO~' ~ ~:;'L~~i~ ft~/v " 0 I U1 1'1' _~ Cj 0 2- rJ?~1:v. dnv~~ ~ 0 ,~ \ jj?J::ti:;;; ~( . C 11117 ./\ ." For more information and petitiOl'f's contact: C(tizen's for 12 D'A Ai )J ~, Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com P.i ~H~"@D NAME ADDRESs,. ':-:-,.1-11 01 tJ dr-'," E-MAIL ~~M:A ~o~rifP-1 # {J ~'L REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! '2 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~~t(~{;~ tiC-CAt&, 0101 JJerJ VM=-I'. ~ ~ueno~ ~c.\'1"'O~~ C"lV>')f $;dl'n 5e<-1 ,~iA f-( r5e ( - I I /) ,j (; 1-1 e l. HI-< /) 1"/1'-,;; ~fff~ fy~W 'lD (-!fir (/Uil( &?/J,'J:p 1)/1\1<1 (2, (OIl (fe' T e (/e fun \(31 6--1['c, {Y\;, hl,i~ , Herd',' -j'c hf'Jlrf- e E-MAIL __ _"II ~ !, //-, 'CLri-./ 0 ? r/( c(' ~ . .1;tU' , }l'-IV"'^,'\ ,..--. c, \''11:; l)qo& ~~~A-N/~ - 11. - For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonit.a, CA 91902, (619) 412-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com Y1 c1 ~ TO AlL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS ~ C' ~. A .. SIG JU E (C!?7 . ~~~ ~We1Xj f'it7-~ 9t-~~~~ ~ft / ~ i [.. ~ ,,10 1 '" ~ -< ~ i,.1I~1 uG{F 'lh.\: ~ !1Y/t P Jtih/_s~'f- Z Kn h In ()fltlo..- M ~!,/:;; rl';Ul~ ) ~ /ic. )t1 <'J /"1 7 '7 11.....<1/1..,,, -or' 1"t',; r-(\ f-A-'Jf. Yt- Y - '. v " , .,i h ~.\ I -~-... .........~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com \~,(.""",\;~- f; ~M\'fC),.f-.;(-f~1 "JTA \)"f';H Ar,ui';r Ii l ~( m:iiiI!J3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS '2. REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS I=_UAII SIGNATURE S\;e,;"" Cl'~e~ \\j '_\L;I~ (\''''1'\'1'1\ LI3SIPE (:;,'ll-"K- <I C ~b I~\,t:\f\ \ A- ~;~, 1 rJ D HIl~rd!1, tjJ~0i ~\JQ; 4, ~m)&t" , tr::f~::~ : bee! uv, ~v', '[,\0 SIMo,td- ...- -~.. 5c'u~ (iWJCI..N _ 1{~ (11) ,S,~l MPf - <.. Xi I', (\ At r '(Ctr ~)l Il/A'VIIA",'A (/70'/\ i JL...} Y I, L..- {,: ~ '..j i\) fjr-i-i,.~ (~\".(J_~~J+p'fd '~7'7 "/~ ',> For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ,,:/111//17 , \ /\,1,--'1,';. ...... ~,- ,- -I' 'I 'll'I'/J" ( ( I' " ,I '- , "......_.,...// \ "} 1"1 1\"',' i-f\\" /) . /~ ~J". ,-\,~'>'~:rc._-~~--e n ler ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFIC!ALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. flt;,{J./ J;::.'~ REDUUEUONGESTION ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE 8R-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and buiit without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~:~~ ~\Q ku.k~ISb VI l!! / ,~Q,~- tJ\sC~.~ .4f:.t?oY Lr-'.I'1c.r.? ~ E.MAIL q ItJ I~IGNAT RE. ~}l{< , l"ll/ ~ ;?% .!1>m 9;..... J If Q t 'CLflh d L ''7..~__/~ -I ,/ . [sa Lvfrr !T{) ;) \?"\k~~ ~ J"'l)UA~' :] / 0 f /J 1/ r: ) /lfJ '(h~ 1YL-~cQ':= ,-) ,. ,. ......\,..lh'" //;.'rl'l/i ^I(;J';)..;~ / ~Qe DOli\lvlil>~ _ e.. T7 'rt} .- rC.iJl? t.I For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonitil, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. f! 1l;J 8r1l~ let> REDUCE CONGESTION Ji~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS', APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E_M.6.11 SIGNATURE l ~ '-{ <2-Le-<-J , \j I tJ eEl-> t .::ff\ d:n_ :.I:n 6 ~vsvr- ~ GI6t--ltA 50 e (~mpZ_ fYliA..Jo.niJ.. l-::f" froc''l a",.u,' /0 r~W;Je_ ~f1;J 1~N~ . \l 0'-\", <1.. :\N\"~ ~ r-~ 1~\ It*~- ~ . { (C',. ' t 212'\ ~ tAi! t ~({ f\ l ( )(\:;I,o,G; (-L, r /\ ('('1""" ~/(....I-\J _I ~-- ' t \J')'S....t-:'-/-j 0;(;, ". p) ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIA~S REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ;It/ttN f{u;:) REDUCE CONGESTION :YS STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! It We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% .. The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SI U E ~~ ;(~...... J. :)-.- t - /':c) !) r___. ) 5 .-' cL/ t"'<J"", fJ!- to fw/( (;X/~G /'~- m, itt;~ -~\~ v.l+~ SLD IA.-W"o ~ ~ Lit1j 1, UUY1rnia - ~ 11/5 ~?~ For mor.. """,mldIlon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com -s'"S' ~ ("Lt> ~ L'0:)'~ ~)~~ if /I,etS/7ll~ t I? I /c e [f}tt/ jf,( /) S KCtIh.o.(\J T, (4sT1''-' DO ! /) . .r: J ~ ,KiChje;_ C~Jr7' '"I/q t} /./ C JJi"f ~ VV) i >4TtAt7c'Y'" . ./MDf.#'r7)t ({,f\!) 1/ JJq/f! Cf'-\Sl~ -3 S b/' ~ ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS rt REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. flC{1fif C(o-o REDUUE UONGESTION it( STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~- ( For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com IF' If ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAI,S REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ;It(,It~ f)u;) REDUCE CONGESTION *r STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS F_MAII '11:..... Y' & / t'/J1/!71/!-!t.l:ifJ )C: ill /}: r"""~;~I'f) .. \ I' , ft r/lfur'!~;e information and petitions contact: Citizen~f; 125 " Bonitil, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~,P: II ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. f/qzldGaa REDUCE CONGESTION Ii)' STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! Ii We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME A.a 0JC1 ir? )3:)')\0.11u' ~\ \ . f\()r)a(~J >YJa,;L. -r]:t1t W'i : ~ -D,wll) i-h\\)\S~ _ AJ~ Jt: \)c O~l\ Atf1..41 t7{(,f(.\-' I} t d<. _ I - 4....11~; -,I /)J ifF :. o ,lNt\{ 0)~\LK\lJD ~ QOSChllU () ~e{\1v'\if~ ADDRESS ,~ ) E-MAIL .,'7 (I~ -7 { ,..,..L----" (:. .:. /' i-If " , '. / I . tiT A,JU'-"/.../';~t ~I ' ()L {jJ,vj1 ..I/jCA'CT .' ,l? '_ ' ~'" lj'jotUo-- f . r'J ~A~~ For mor~ II II V" """un ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 \7 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.c:om j/ J ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. fI~,f/li/Gu/) ILf REDUCE CONGESTION JfJ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~ \ \ ~(I ~f'AIF(H1j\ Jd~:~\ i8~7,,16 ~ _ ]:>,il1:rJ 1+<( I ~ .eS ADDRESS E.MAIL c) 7 I/q 1<; w'I\J 7) (}tCS (;4f11fY/[{/iJ I ]klod(lJdJed t .~~~t ~\ r\ \ 1'13 ~ I ~!-r \0 e:v~~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com -+ mIii[!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFI~IALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. (-!CCilV €JttO REDUCE CONGESTION dtr STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! 1/ tt We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS (tf/~1 ~e~ fA! : 6ctWL'd 7ea:I;A . l,.;;r 15- ~1Ch'~'Y)hjQ, 1 / ro6 Ii Pi \-.. 6"1" P. rl.('Ot \ .' V '-1 ~C.({. JJ(,/['ullf' '-"dl)ll'1fH'1) '" II. 1 (~ 'Y4J/J 1'1' tuN v ',,{-:''::>, I ' :D/l/V I {, a Ie vv 't" , j1J4l" ~:rr.1h f(Qo~ AI",_ (' ,~l,_ ( 1'/1 ~~ {~/' J(" 1,1. '~,<i~ ':~ 'v r- E-MAIL -11/- <' , :/ cr' leI f/" )/.':' "'-, _\'.-.' _ '" '0 1; ',) ,,/, /:./1 / .. ! -" . ~ '/ .( ,','" . - " (i ;}0?' '" (/'(~'<?~:(~!:;i,,/'r:"~y:/ ",:,-'/}kil11 ,)" ' ' \\~ ". I~tt 1r(\\l\U,t~r'/ iA\, , ' ' ," I' '\ I '/9)3 C'o01;j For ' rIC 1I1l0rmatl(ln ana petitiOns contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citil.ensfor125.com p If ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. *,J (fp. () 3 REDUUE UONGESTION 1t~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. Is ~ tIIiG~Q\ 11. MallarQ; ADDRESS E-MAIL c, ;c 1'\ '9062 ~19 () For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 12 Ronita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com \Z~ ~rcc--d3 ~'l>.~ 'IIyv/ll1 /)t( I (j ) ~ ft Imii[!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ?/ttlJ GrtLl> REDUCE CONGESTION $i~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAI~ ./ ,1. .... SIGNATURE \ \.. -'f) "'-, q fql'~!- 19t') "---._-' IS i L! '1,\'( 3 For more Inrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, 01' e-mail www.citizensfor.125.com ~~.. 108 ?t~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAl REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL - ~ '1/,11" [.lA,y,;iC,,{{;z;,:; ~\ cI4"S- )JMD~W;t\ A(,(e4,-- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail \N\.vw.dtizensfor125.com tl fIG ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, atay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to atay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~€J~. ADDRESS E-MAIL ~ 'K() ~rtJi2~11 .~ f<t(]~A/\-v"-l' C. U (7 I I wAlk 0 ~o1'f) ~;t ~ h"'#i"~.. '#~~.~. . 9 {Ct... ... --- .//' / .1- / . -') tJr' 1 --- g.4 --" I' G. 5'~ r?C('> (1:-' c{J<Z. . ~.;?'" v- V /'- ~rf ~~cjZ&, .' /'" " ? ~ , . "'j/ -./"/ . ... 1/.. / l' {4- 17' rc it L/,- , . , /. J(r'(~t/rp;r:A ~~ ~'1 Y 5" t.. G. 1/ For more informiltion and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 . Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 5'-1 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION 11j:t::: STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~ L j Onl I 1ef'Jl/W/!r, UZrJtrre'/4 <\1\aY\t' \~~e : W/?t-/JfI11 ~A7vP'?6~ ,)J (/ LI\-f, V1 () J. 0 d ,~Iifh/ffVl ()()/17r-t . .0 t - ~hld/I/I (I.' 3 . Q.r<a-.. 0~~1:!f:Y7~ ~.ij5'~ .J", ~ (,,1{~ I J vl jl \,-i- V' j- ~ -~ ~ ,--- ) , ---- fo . ~s.. contaJ2f: CiijZ'e or 125 '/ . .' iJ~ 1902, (619) 412-1447, or e.:marr--~itizensfor125.com, l- I /t...--------....-.-- Itf ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. /llm.It"'.... REDUCE CONGESTION 5~~z-- STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS :puu~ ~ )(lQ~- /~vlc (trG(IMC"l1cr/(f"UI --2!- v .( MU IV) frYVJ- '--~ E-MAIL rJlH./. . .ifiJ:e>-3 t)pAO;n7G l1t/~ 4 CAfU1C A/ r:h!~ ,3T ~v.'S r q,(7 I u\, {J' Ed\Jlu~~\:~\-5 :Vi _t " '<..'7 a >b~ ? - ([ jf;7~C' <::. U ~ f"S(l !((..,z{ r!;:f /J/z.d77!1z7 /) '! ./). ..' 1. _ '/-.:CtttvA /~,'-~l---.,<:i:/"::Y-'~ ?:Cf(. r (;/--{-, I J (au.d ~~ ~~11!~~ . . \c 111;111/11.6. fAk iYlorqa ~jCfc,t-(OliVl- ,\-~II,!(}Il.f.) ) '<11 "i l ~vlL . . . .! For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com .) ':dLlJ. ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS / y REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION :::Z~: STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS C\;)Q Job] 4-ritaJl_ n \-)~()!\/A 00 AVVjL, i -) ~ r ^,,--C-t " ^- I{Lb~_ U~L{)I;U~ _ \( ; c \..-rlll CZl-v'0Y'4 ~ ~\C. -oJ ~'J"C<If\_ \ PfJ-UH-6L- Po D{Sc;q-L ~h )\J~) ~ /JJ;V)~ v)Q...5 _ -- ( e, r\ \~~~Y'- E-MAIL 4- I ~ ~.-vj WM)}2tc+r ;2 ~~! -.,-L..",\ . ", ' :~ , ,;',;;':', C "_~',G,.\(\, ;'1 _c) I/t> ~Jw~ (!JJ~ lLe fir F-:f) V,("'~Jn ~ For rh-ore information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ --J)' /, i~,!, Ul "\f7 "~._-- 1---1-c\ {~Cf1,~I',.' , , ~ 0 . -',__f, '''~, . I ,~i' .:.0'.2. ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS /'1 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION :~~: STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~Job) ,qJHmlL _ . \-J'1\)~/A PrOAVVlS Q~'^' I, cTtLb~_ ){jL()(M~ _ \;;\cY"rlo C~~ _ ~\l 01 ~0(\v(V\_ / HL- J/-?,,, E-MAIL r 4- L ,",' ~'c ~ v.\.~\.\'JC ~.,/t -W w1A (} 1J.CV lLe fir if) ~1-4u For ~ore Inrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com " ~9u(VJ^ dtwl. floC) ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS PI REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. A 6r""',,...- REDUUE UONGESTION 5~1c.~~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. IqflS NAME ADDRESS A-~ (( I e.. De ( L _ b_1J e. //" (0 tp;&!/ ~ " yUi:qrln-e :/Jr.f::(~1.-:JL ~\ VY\ f' \ \4 M-:bJ1:1 F(..lih E-MAIL /' >, :r / I:::> - . ;;?,g/V,M /)011/.4 '. 0 ~ fi U. I{) Jhc)<S,J/) ..-r- ' 'J1 C -c 00' \/(JY7fSQCr C7CfIf'/rj ( &;;~f;-' (11,: v ~/'_~!J J"l/--!,((" , Il/lt/f'll /~ /"/--;, ~7 ! .' ," . .--r,/, ...1 . (...... I . ..__j/'" IYIIf-:,~. \,C/Di::?r." c.t, /s (/. ~~~ ~I/f? /J ,q;c- 'Q17 ?iJJlpyjAfy/~/:i S;, i) '1 2.0 if /17 . ~ (IC. c_.. ~ ~~: - /- c::- -,,,,,,,,---, p ......." "") D~'-// c/. )4/).!...y-?,";N (, ) 1 j.... .....- ,,;'--, t/ T r ,c..---. "'. ,\.. '.~ /~..---.~> " , ,,"J ) /t. I,) I~./I._/.' I,' c/, u 7 ' Ii" ,/ / / ' " !l ;1'- , " i -- , ' :" "~f/,j- to /~ ./L,'<'~ t=:'l..'--l\ tA..HA FF f '~:1CO fl:~~ta~ i~;r~40~ For more Inrormatlon ana petitiOns contact: 1.ItIzens for 125 C Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e.mail www.citizensfor125.com + ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS I t.f REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. Ah,,-J.4""- REDUUE UONGESTION $~(~~,~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE _3~. ~'1f~ ~---~. ..----'-~ -, ..l ~~ S Sf~1K- C-o<~ t,1) / /LIYl K/n_sm~ ~ ~_ ~!J. '~{rICK.. f.J/C~ /2 s:(~~ '~{)~h~ C\t\, Wc.&/ ^:'> -- rrCI '(\<..C'> R.l (0 .:; ( -1 J,yJr) {!.<<,rz.. ..1 - \~-" ~. (31'-l~ +~,\.\, ..~ (S <:S , L 'I ( t_ L. t\.).i (___~!.. ~- ( ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS Ii REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ,4bY~,,"" REDUCE CONGESTION S-d4ZqV STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. 13 '1 CJ(1?J/J- ~( Ul , '--;" (J I!L +-~ ~ f NAME ADDRESS Kf.t~~ ~ jN~rf ~1tY\7 ' - ',: y - {LOI batci~ I ~ '" i~ ~\o-re1 -- (I.9-,'--~ i;..- _ ;P;;G7l1 7 ~cC~ Lo.. (R AI! ~ aG \) <.f -'/ tfJ ;)/~ ,{, ~ . ~"Q., hcSb J --'" ' h1 ~l Ot/IMN. \ k tAdyr_ - ..--. I6AliA 0Dw ectU I l fC/[,U1c>J - E-MAIL /CJ )K- 51.A- VI'(;f~ For more InrormatlOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com '~~ TO _ALL~LE~TED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2- l'1 "REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. Ie{ 77 ~ J 1'<J/IV; h (!yf2.~ ~11~ "'777 !:;Lljp. N J;t/ftLTI?-, c: ~";'wc~~ ,~ eft. a S ~Jtble ~-V~~ \f2~tV7 ~_ , I ()v ; :;f1;N( € (S.10\) '~)Muj QAJJ~ ~J \) ,\ \M\\\\lt\ ' " ,f!,&; 0J 71 tUl- ~' \ , ,/ E-MAIL 7 w 'Z. cJ 'l;>=~ ~ 1t"(6y0; ~ For more" "Vlllld..UII dno petitiOns contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~t ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS L Ii REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ALiG..fl ~rr\I(~ L. ~ ,,~~'t- ~ ~]~ ~~~~ "':f;:' J6€ L PARKe/? Loo rdts \.~G.""\ -.-: ?ypL' ~~ ( ~ 1 ...Jl. t.J (f2,~ .( ALM "I- {)-I '~"'I"V1"-' . -It, !-"16fXI,I$n .~ t?I W f\.tJ ( let -It )JW ADDRESS !.MAIL SIGNATURE / L ? c",lyt;aC. _]cV-UtdSJr \? ~.Je{,Q.. V>jr,:e [h(jrl~ )L /~:~~~~ ~ . -II ere- 1+-/-1 1C)((L ..... U f\):U06L{ (~A-'~ k 1[ct~~D~~C ~m~K f7(J(ck ~trlvf.PI;/- For more i",unlldIlon ana petitiOns contqct: citizens for 125 . Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472.7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com t-C", 1 I' 2 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE 8R-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS 4 Ccttm Un th c Dt hr..~ hrufiJ ~ ~ 'J" ~ Mirra; fJ OnTlI! Y/1JS ;///A-r;/J. IflJ IV ::J.1J/R 7. ( ijAiLitJcu.JUJfV ~ G I! r:rc.i en (.p .vIA'!"'" il ~~&<(::~ J)t:1J. i SfG L- ut ~ \~~. E-MAIL /7 VJI1IJ,(~ ~ ~~ 'fr(~~ ~~ ~~~, 77'1 , 7 7 7/ -5 <::: For more ....v,.."..'v.. .""u IJl<mlons contact: citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~~ ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. 9/t) IV fC/zl.r Co.~ NAME ADDRESS ~/4, k~Ml/)'-h1 _ ~ ]); fh/III-' 7/ f:4~ _ ~ cpl'IM':> .- ~~~ <) hL~ r--- a' fl (vi --f' (0) ~() lAM~ . CAV'i"-o.. \c.; .} ~r((EL ~...." "'JIY\~ ~rm ,~ ~~\\l',~,nr:Mlk,_ jtk\, F)'-;f'. 't---vv If L/. e1f:)\)~ L, ()(t7\'L E-MAIL 919~ J?{ tMID (q ( I }qll J) \0)/\ 110 1 eJ:_ ,,-- " '/0 .(() )! f {~iJ)-- f ~f) S 7; 77 7 or mOJ~ 1IIIVIIIIQLlVII QIIY t-'...Il,I"I....II~ .......'1............ ,........._..s for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor.125.com L ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAil SIGNATURE :) ,fRAY bAa7A "2 \/ ~~15\ ~~~ / ~ v11~<:<; '9 S/J tu-M-1 0UU6/hJd~t:. ff;:1JPt _ g~ ~ (f~<-P tk~~'r- 11IUoc-kJ'6p; /1 _(4?'<u ~J\1~ 1, 0JILLi"4r'1j'Oj1.~ q ?<-;& /(4 Yot'? d.A.), b S 7/.e6, 'r;//..,A 1//5<-7- /;P~~ c' I L ill_I" I.. \."(7<.-7"('> I')' 1./,'/' /7. -./ ' '9:lLLk.<, 1:'f:!- fl. <. - \../(/UJ'l'~~,/./'~j ~ ..,e._r- rY't"M.....\.-__ For more III1UlllldLlUII dllO p"'mIUII~ COmdC{; \,.mzens Tor 125 . . Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~ 1~ ~~p~_ dA ~~jy- 9'o?--- 'vhe,~~ For more infOrmation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I"" (.1I4/,d ADDRESS - - E-MAIL - .- "-/3 ,.~,.." 9-4'/00 '6 l" /::> ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 14.-j' REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. '*V {ANt NAME _...... I E-MAIL ADDRESS / 11 ~ 1bTtfla ~JjLe1__ -if}l ':iJCf _-filke (c-1JT~tlll CM~ Sch,'A mr. For mor"" II 11""'1 H1Q;..IVII allY IJ~\,I"IUII:;' \.VIIl.CU..l.; \.ruzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! ~5 5 We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. 1?f7h t.;...! NAME ---~ ,-,-, +-1..... '1-JS'~ SIGNATURE _AD[)RES~_. .. __ _ E-MAIL Pi \A . D ~f ~r6 \ (\ \'\\. \k'O\ \ ( ) ^""" L- Nf\) \ C ANJ)f}C/E. S7 AHL ~ \bct'+~ '5iotrtlo /tnfl ;/?()I P~L r0' ~/.1S ., d""AV..0tJ tth ~\\ !tt J _ L?/~6-itlo/M./ q/9/ I~ 0/- ul For ore information and (petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com IS ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS .:!1 5 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. /........ftl"'ll"... '1-13 HI,.. 9~.IS"-_ . SIGNAT~ '()t{IJ/ (if;f ~ ~);, (' .J ~ ~ fm fJ '9/!J - l ~ AJ '/Jill 11J1g;~ ~&o6e~ _ SiAtUu~. ft. ; (<.t ~ lA<.. ~~~ &m"c: P /--Lcrl'-.) ?'() For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 / Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I:> ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ill ~ . .. .... REPRESENTING SAN DlEGOCOUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. /?_ t.",,.vJ NAME --~-- ~-/~-- ~".. '1-q-N SIGNATURE ADDRESS E-MAIL f I?A~ 1/ L. c...: rd Li rt 4<< vVI. LC<.I.rJ ).: ((Crl!> IS '11'j,5 - ~ VI$" ~ ~~'- '11"'/3 n I CfI . '-..., c^ ~r (!~ c/?~ /IV!1.f>. ~ tilt< (lq Y/90 , , ~j!;:__ C~\I.~C'- \! \6~~"<0\['kCc...A For more Inrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125~' q \C- Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~v(:fcO(<;;'?:A' G4':T'f? /3 '1'J Cf!l ~~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is a roved and built without further dela~._1.: (,.:>~ \ l ;h~u~ ~IGNATUR For more information and p Ions co tact: Citizens for 125 llonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com \ \ jJ~~ d)~().,~ Lu 15 De fa 0h0 -o/c. -I ])o/~$ ::p,ps.Gker U(.'SSf C.)fS{'O 'TT J f 'S>L6 &4 f.c;-n _ ~cJ~~. ~ ~/ki:!.'~&L ~ ~\F;--rrFNC>JJJ/lir2 ;?Jf2&r-,UA ~L _ S \D G; ~'l-j;'K) ':> ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDE~E AND LOCAL OFFICIALS J!3 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ,.e.., t...:.J ".. 'J' .tl NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL :r;~~~) ~ -jPf'f71 (v-d'J'JI ~ .:+'VU More/l1o JI<_ c6Q~R o-c( ~ v~'L Cif,7/wJ - "\ (I Inet J LE/l.Af'J) ~)A1J , ~ >-/L- (,.,e-F A., '/ff ~ ::;Jw~"_.a./2M_~_.# 4' lI; (A~ -de 9/Q/c; For ore information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com Cl>L ,1$Jt4tjf~~ ;/ ,~ 83 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME /(Jrcftej& S'nf10;..... /f;v!l,&tkKJAJ ~\\ ~ Va,C/7t" ~&; /111!v1f, /,JIII,A no r: s.T.~k:; ,,;) fro fM<!A/tk, ha/JI/t/ 1Itu./"i? CAnlell'f l-P~cP'&Y ~ _~~)te) _ls!~f'1AN)){7 IM/~~,{ q} 9/3 ~~::tJ~ ~fO L For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ADDRESS E.MAIL ~.~ru~ _ ;1 - ~-==s k\ '?o2- ( h ~ ~ 117/~-~ 9/98 .- ) , l e tV I , --_.~--~ 6 ~ ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL '~ Da)l\lC\ 6)q~((F\ g fWc!K2- J, T'.1: L(OAL ~'~> 6~_ ~ 4'1---' --~-tu . (j_ ~ "'- f4U,J -....... e. (, ~J,q;(b' ~.~tuIY),\ -!: , 7 .L- ,,::. tc 1\.(, P- .' . ...-/ I-'Ii L:--rl<. UN!' ,J - /.)"-,, .J. (I. . '.) I'. " <'. ,cot _. :-\:,,~ It L t '. .j{'~~A~' J:;:' ~'>". <':::'1 , -; /<~:' ., --" Lt-'-J'd, /4./tl" . '":/?;'/ /(/(I,yj,,";, \./ ~l. , .' For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com CM/Lf (hC!i'v1<./ / ..d?f ,"/' /.,_.. / ----- ~~f~. . , C !.,...> f/ / w/,.,' ,/ - -------:--- 10 / I '13 ) .?W3 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDE~E AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, ~ APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE 'L c;tf{ J :J";;hN t,/1cG-MfI' , ~<.~ r", otJ", 2 e'h/) ihes-1 ~ IJ iYW /)11 J p }Ji-P-/ -'- \lr0r\\/~?A v-J'r.(-f"\~", I " ~;-~~l~~t:tt[ ~Ek/'-<-' khlA>\Jv f-t.1(~ KArbi..bl 7;. ~J ~ (A~,/L -~ -~-~. ':"-1)- .~r- ~/lt; 'I'C t).{? .<1 ~ r / D /11, ,~tzp'Uj 0- . / //// ../->/7:] /-~ ,-1 '.~/;O:/ #'1' C -~ / I : ~'uJ.' .", L \' ,0'/\ '-"'/Lv "''--/ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com /0:) .-- 1 q TO ALL ELE~EDERAL, STATE A~~~;~ ~F;~~) REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS -----..--- E-MAIL ;. \" -' 011rJ-f/l'l(, U4 ILY{ 1- ~~e'- ,1'cw,J " ,4 ~,~ ~. \'7/l0 '>'ix . I . ."~_ ! . , 'J, q 11 i..!...,., ',' , .,,-.;pL_ 'p-ll ! Y<- / , .~yt cd (,1'21\ ./ \ \ 'r; "'J-p\v j, r:v'-' .~ t;~)~, \~.v t;;~- 1 r" , UTrt/v PI J->C) \....-'&" t(~ i \N...! (; -1 I'1M"!\l\J hl\ \<\I\J~\"d~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com (j\(\oo:~ I~l( ~j,~t I~ I U c-J l--, rm:iim TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. - ~ E-MAIL , L- f,!o<r'j-e,1 iPI? (1 J _ f2-,~1 'J (eh~'h ft. , b /,/;1l'/I!! 'f iV R 0'<; ~Uj;1 ~;)- r\~Y' GL~b ,; ~~~,~/ f\r,ye\C\ ,)QenZ _ ~ ' ,"/://,c,cu_:;'r.. / .( \1 {\~ r -. , (' '/11 d ! J.e "'\ vccuv.- v) " {..L /((. j .~(j lAPv-kr " l ; t 77 '\ / . Jf:tYO (aJ\ ~V{!"\_ _ ~/: / ';;1 " f<J6r.: 1'/1 ~ Il '1 ,4f../A'i'.i ';q , ~(c;0 A/~(l1fJi. !lillj/a /if A;;;tz su [/(1-Jf~kd"-d/;/::S{l . for more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 ,~/ Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I ') ~ TO ALL ELECT~RAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2c:c REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. N~E ADDRESS /~ ,\t.'Su) r<\. Wh~1L_ O~)(I,. r !I1iJore ~ ~ 'l!.k s: / ,~ .E-MAll ~ 7 .- :/'.. L ." /T \ f"'/ ~^'2LruL. .1 I (~,vIJ-~ 7 ~~ '-I ~~C LALl !1-v t:(JU~ CjV M'~%!~'_~~~_ -/ 7r)~4~> ~-OW~L ~~ In=~ lQ<"LX-A_~ J:::& \. (J-~) 1/P". { I fr tV<1-.ltt. I ~ I l 't 4 . lL Lf./lJl-J '/{))1,.(.ftll Ie LEt /, . ." , t~ ."" /J' .--- ,i. I 11 / 101{ f/- V l"- e7J/4 ,d4V ,<~ ft > ./.[~. .. 5ll II M bJ> 12~4 )11 ,{I ~ rz- '; !f7 W (i! L>YL1r', For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 ,. Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com z 0 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS [r) REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. t!ttdi) ~ \) REDUUE UONGESTION *~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eas~lake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% \ . The construction of SR 125 has been delayeCl by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. I I .4h1~t-'\e&O~ 4--L_~ i) r1'l3'V '>/IVV , - '~~ m /z;/.~-k NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL o r l5 'l'> OM j "J. . i 1t~H,,{~l~l . I),A.{ e'2 _ , '- o JJ.M~.JJ <of]) It w, -1 /I '10 '1//'1/ t, ~_:?/9LJ ~ L 7/<;/</ .: -. ~ 9)'1 } 6 ,!J (&d;;:/~;~/ ~ I Cj 14 .J (7-. t.-) P Oft! U pe D\jlkj2t1~ 'C'/ ~/2(i \2b-1~ (2.a-rES Y?it)'l'fdq2-~ 11 f 'J /J for more infOrmatiOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com f-ft(lAi tftt 0 'Vf ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS~ r" REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. :1t ) (, REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned beli~ve that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. \)nl\ ~n\eL lIa1f1cl0 G(A'((.,\c.. _ Wb/TII /l t,k,tUJE _ f7 hr/S h<;cheJ _ -, ~ ~Af\-rAUiAV F/5cJ.t6e. _ c:J, r I A Q. S4MiJiL.=; a. 1::' L I '- ()'i.. ,If " -}"o - GO f-o&iZr Pc I MlJe(l.~ _ ~~{TI:A~ (. 1 G\', ~ (/,J,,",- \ \L..e.-~ , JOI n~ f) ()fr-'I1~~ l-JtLLrtf Sa Vt; 1 SIG~E '7 m?Z- '').- .,!it,~ ,/j',(J ... ~~ , {l )u.....; a (/(5~ iJ ~~..~ '2.-.4, ~:t:~ri,r ric; ~ '7/ ri\- (:{ cJ.-1\-~ (\...).J;-e M1/T\~::T'~10f~ ~t) lUil: () (--- Cu" I! '" f;z(., "C:Y(.../ / ,,/1.11/ ,l/7l-&- : ;;...:" (. .. t-d'7-F';!ttt,,:;;-rc .-.. )' , -;::::7 n.': ;.- ( 11J(,~t:{; /)/"',( Le(c Y'lttJ \l"'-'- ru" \II J j'i) "" .." ;:1 I .7'/ ',~f' J I' I;> 4, Y' I", , " fi t/:'-~ ("'~/rrL/ l;"...~/Li..,'_-'f4L i ., !..:. .. ..' '1 'J [fCft.!l( I For more '"'U""""U" ""a petitions contact: lltlzens for 125 0'1>" , I .' , Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL -'""' t/vJli/ q-!l() ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS lJ) REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. J\>"{ 1\ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by governmenved-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the-influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built Wit~out further delay. \ NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE 'I WAlAlI Fdi/E' C4vl:,c>f7H !f616t7<-MMryftj #fd Cr1l1 lCllez_ ~Y\~~ . Vl~ \A1t1~L ~ J3xettck fj:.K- -L L;LJf/'.<I .~~ I a7;I~1cn~-= .- /~L5 ~ J....>rnJ) .../,. . / -- H~':J IYl'-fulOt flfl 'B~ (~w~,1t) \ Ll~ 14. {fa vvJGZ For more infOrmation ana petitions contact: Citizens for 12 / Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com .... , ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION ~~::u~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! {5 We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS . 'RA.L<P~ 'i)tt..- A,WI-Ir ~~~v:1s,:L:~ Jlfr //hrCtrbih- fU/cJlIrJ. "!!t Q Tl ~a -VI' ((I ~ . WlNJoC#1 L FiANces;< ALh,'dS?-l!... I E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~t:(<o,/IJ~T o~ - / 7/1 F-! ~p: f1Qrr ( ,~ 1(~ \\: '-' U~J)M~ .--;., D .,\1 ,ll ,.... () Ii~.) " -.J ' II -r; 1Ib.-5fY\ ,-+ J, ;J ~~7l;J;--~ KJJQvn, MIPJ-b'! ~ (].,.~I ) 'I~,k (})\/\JJ~G ~ _' ...)\~~6 ~r/ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447., or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 15-' ---/ rft11-' ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERA't:;STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. !/tllrJ 1fu1 REDUCE CONGESTION :iJ/ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~ E-MAIL SIGNATURE (?KU.,. ~ 15/6-4 y: ;.k ~ <Of) <'~r/\L ~(Jliftu::;de? '1Cf! ~ t\~ /<9/~ k. QI'1/S I'll "J I I"" JI/\ (7\)!-" :" ~"M. 1/ '1 6 ~:~ -j/%e.....- ! 1.:3' iftp-f....... (l~wu...Ni(7/ . A, ~.\ ~ ~ y\ .;~~ L-( :d", For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com \ . Pro"'; <:'0.. 1'10" 0.- VI _ ~e,,~ ~fM;er \ I 'D1.Jlc.A- (~.ijQf! '\ ; , CE 'Ufj J. HEALA0 /'r,p /\ .. ! 'li-0 L.O'u '---"--- ~ . if'I\&\e~) ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ,A- hrcui,,,p<- REDUUE UONGESTION S<J~z~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS J<CFe (~l~\\ 'i-,VAt0Cl C\<<1112- i'~,cl/i...- U)R/~'H r . ,/ MIClMt-L ~'~-\...() ~ Quif}etl"~"o1 . E-MAIL SIGNATURE IL l.c(1rYl V\""' \\tI,o.l'\ll\t~~ .. - tin.' I rr ~ S,. D t<. 8- CI. (\, . 5-t_ 'o~ I-) N I ~-r6- L YjM- j)- f{H03 1 ;It- L'^-J fluew:.Jl Far/e)J~ f{ lif.ers -.: /;;/) prObe 7 J / ~~ ) -' ~ q \ (;1 II For more" II UIIIIduon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e"mai! www.dtizensfor125.com / NAME " ~lc c;j~1) l CfAAv B~ It- t> ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE l;,fi/~ c aA-t f tb / ~. For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mailwww.citizensfor125.com ><f IDiiir!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 1 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. !+qkrJquO REDUCE CONGESTION ifr STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL ~ jfa1firs -::r~rNAME ;07-f;t-l SOJ1 FtVf'/1l1/ For more InTOl'l1'IMIon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com It/ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVESR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL ~~ /~ L7-"'~ / :[. '1- b l'J,<oJ:O~""'".. For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com Z-- ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. / NAME . , :Jj~~ ,I..)~ .Q {j )~ t ' ADDRESS . E-MAil SIGNATURE 'Q(3 ~ ;/ .fJ~ff~~ . (, \' '). Q'1HJ tl' i~Qc-/~..N'"ciJ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS /fj REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION ~~::~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 wm shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~~~~s ~~:;c~ , j (I' J f';;J, ;11--- ~ 0 vMe 1 8C r {(C( t1t#?-S (~ brA: I .A kJJR-cAo) ~ \ tT(~L\ ~ .~ bMaJ SI'1OW J rk-r-;/( /~f{Y ~ ~f1I1lS ~ 6/ lanJ -1 fY ~ lJll~ lk-ltWC, A"VlOU. - j;()f\ nil W, \ I'. ~ _ 1)f.g~ TlArif!L::GrehJvi ~ tIPM1- (;CIV u'f1 J< G-~IVC, Ro ~?<7 ~ bZ- L- rgilf 1f,&f rt' ? )(Jf 1 tIlL ill OJ /\vI, ( ~ !,L~4C~? - .- ~\1 \.J~r'~ 1 qf1j() . fJi /1)~ 14}~ JZ& tl'i (j . . '.~> For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND lOCAfct'CIAlS j ~ ~ REDUUEEPCONGESiION' g~:-::~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ~ ADDRESS -<J7Cf/~ WgJ- rr \Z-tJ\\tJ uN? 'CLflb L,L.CVo(,(? r ~ \ \^V\f' ~~O\<., (~~f.4 S;~_, jjlU/l( /7 fi S!h tf2-;~ ,j., hi)) ~crl\ l\~ddlCY\ .- - Q . ~. liY\J f2l?-\!8~L ~ 1\. U\6iJ:;g, E-MAIL -.~' ~ /'-#--t^-4-- , ~ "" .~ .--/ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com Il IBiiiI!!I TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALt STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ,.:;- REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ;16,"1">,,,,- REDUUE UONGESTION ~~/au~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! o We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streetsl 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtownl Otay Mesal and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%1 to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. fJ/.45~ ~ ~ISPIf J'/11 i HI ADDRESS E-MAIL ;qC; qc;' ~ .~ r (yef. . cry,> /5 ~ :!if- / I.!:--- ,,--- ~ .-- 30; c.J "-~. . ""., i ~,N \ , ~Q~~~ll~ < . tfLt' 7lv6] ,* ~: .' . ,(\ v For more mrqrmatlon and petitions contact:' Citizens f - Bonita, CA 91902) (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com .~ 15 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LO~~L OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP" GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! ~ We the undersigned -believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. 'c' . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ..J lIw 'q...,') "'"SIGNATURE , ~- - - ""1/ . For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 k:~ c:::!-o::.~<":'~'llOnita(~~~1?~~, (619)472-7447, or e-mail www.citlzensfor125.com _.~ ~3 ~3 ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AN-D LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. .... G,.; . J' ~~., NAME A[ l'OMP,Jn UiV ~ - ~+~d\~~~ A:AIl.I/Jlt:.tiI S'1J:JJ.! -J. ;- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT ELA YS, APPROVE SR-125 OW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Die 0 Regional I Transportation plan.' · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion orllocal streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to'Downtown, dtay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% '. I' . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by overnment red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request 'that you u the influen e as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and buil~without furt er delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL v - ~~~~y~ 1 For more Inrormanon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 ..-/-.. Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizerf~or125.co".. '~<O"~ ___. 2_- - TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ~ REDUUECONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~5"G~f<rj L ff!JfJZ(O~V {Q.j."'V1- -~oo;c~ . -f 01 ~ ~- .tl ~r~ E-MAIL 3 !!II /' , ;;0 ;eJ2A f j.J E S 1h:= [) n 7/ For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! z-- We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE "b41-i v-A. f,A~ s ~~/'~ (3ro-61 ~vv is Vtn~, ~ '77 ~~~~~ & f).h--_____ t6--.'!><--<c-- ( For mort. ........IIlIU"'.VII emu l.n:uLlons contact: lltlzenS for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I ./ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! 2~ /-) We the undersigned believ:e that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. ., . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL ,j;ft~~ ..; it 7 .-- . ~~. .- 5~ 4-?~) I.J... ~l <? 1/ /t. ~_ q /'1 I) ')'''fc-Jt5 . - /~4~~)~_ For more infOrmation ana petitions contact: (.Itlzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELA IS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL ~c ~ ; , J- ~ ~Wir ~1I\\) ~ \ AA. \S'dL \\ SIGNATURE ~~(~ u~,.~ ~ \ ' '-11'MtooP--Ir(9;1 ~ -I \ <._~ \ 1,. ., , ...:.. j',., ( --- " ~ J-G/t-/r ~/Z/e;WM , -~ ~~ J /-uJut;\_( 'r&' d~ ~t.~_, -~ \r \\-:}I~ ~ , 1 F ' r more infOrmatiOn ana petitIOns contact: lItlze for 125 / Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or~_c' . en fo!~:t()~/ c ' ;J . ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALt STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ~'II REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ':U "'If}/'(;uy ~owlli' , " kO. ~ I ~ ~'A~ / . / '- 1A~~f; _ ~/t~ !~ '1(./~1ll\ ,~ ~ 1Ft-~J1- vlZfz -' ~ --ttL-~_~"~l.&~ { '1 y& ~;..L A 17~ ~ltJ""1~/~ _ ~'(!.\ --z;:,-Z:0--R.l-eA 1(.:. \J-t. (V1vl/cA . ..~ . VI? ~.\ ~ ~t\~O $.. ?:. J? .2.. , t h/'&/'a Ah.,j;{ ~ . 'X"A '1~1\{i14/t1~ 1S1A fA ,q lqll 1 For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 I( I},I,V!r: f--,4-t;.d-{ ,;';s.k ,. Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com . .A E-MAil Ji2:::PA ~ Ii{ IIIIJG L '7... ~:::s:: / ~. ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS \0/' REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected / officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. , :,L -g /<:: ~ SIGNATURE ~-rf.-: 1 CU{~,.,:A, L ~ -- ~ ~ -~ (' ~7 ~~- Q~-~,- d ell-'l#-'f(/'1.. VFOZ1{; ~_ :::'.1'"-1-'\ L/~': '~J,~, V"'V'''''J ,j ,~~ }'f1:f For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Sonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com -- ~'l Zy 1- \ v ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction ~f SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS N ()'f ~ ItIOR~- . JfLid'if: ~'" - S'l I\,; _ fl#7!6/Jr-j(J A rV/o1.///:?- ~, . ~Jifii~2 ; ljf'~~;;:H~\ E-MAIL SIGNATURE 77 / ~ ~013 k- YO)/ T , 1-- - 9/~,A ( 'lJ J--- ~~ ___ ------ --;' B;ib{ n~ r ;J:t: 1/10>- ~t{~~l\~~ 7, /13.1J-t7'; (}I 9/~J z.. ~ (, G\I-1, t:L;f ~f! 0, JJ lp.- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens fo 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com flI) t 0/ ef ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. , We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. . ~~~i~O- ')\( Ro~'" Gn-t';D-_ t. '. L <f' .11 ME-MAIL , . SIGNATURE ~ Ul!2~Q~ !) ~ ~( }u :fl(ltL/J-~ tJ'" (4. "1(' I/~ SR~~. ~ ~6 '/J(fIII 71. I. 'I)..fl (], qv<< ?' - ~,w,RC)V'(J.ld f.' r/.I.. . lt5h f?f.lM. '~~;:J{lt:: ~~~~.~. ~ "') '- /'" . f,A.l bk",C' .------.- M\.JA \Prr/\ t:\~ \ \.I' CA '1Z(~ciM~c...etL / /l -+-'--\ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 J-/ Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e.mail www.citizensfor125.com 1 rv ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. . REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE r 'Tf-I).~~ ~ .\? a,.{,/2Jl,7f(R~ , ~l~- k- L Ll~, ~V\ (.jPiJJc '~l _~C '~f'~ .t b <:7/124>" C lL-~ ~ . J-l( ~-w J(l.,t ~~ flfq'ff 1'1/1~/-.(NIL ,A~~ A ~rIr-% ) 0. _ (l/rjt.!::.-:Cc-; Q ,1;/;. 0/ _\\A \\ .g-t\rn~ rrJOfI ,m-.damab . /]:~ /J1IfALI"Jt /J7 ~lU'~ AL--ft:JYl/;WV-r . I / 1- or more int9fmation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ! Z::~~~"'" -.. '\< es7( \ 1. I Y ( / q->.."'\i!t F~MAIl A,~ -fb;,~~~ ,I ) V~j ~ jrvaJ ,bw - fL.- P ~:()'-77 1L dof-IL-J TJ (: v\ ( (Zq/P'lt/C=-, ~' f' ~ !( J/- d :; A:~~ '-L- c... , q 1) (?:, Cf ~J~,Al~ S'WIW~~-u ~ 1 r1'7J 1 l(~ (/r i ~"-- cpr II {;1/1c~a-....1M (( ~ .' ~ ~ ~~ ~ 0, ~ ~ .? p ~ct 4" /YLP ,..:1<, lffj44~ AA/Hi! /ft- ;r// O~ ,.~ 2- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Ilonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com <.. , y~ . 2 TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! . We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ~ '~#~,) (t5 - J {'"'Avos L''v1d6Gy ~ "+'- ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE {~,~;--- , c?"'r-C~&'i pc:;;>...~ / I .., c~9-- "'X \;t(~ Ir a~1;l(JV _ C/;,/ ({/JRfL_ ii/ILL /tIs&t fM~ d1JjArJ v'A-rv 5'L<.::Y . > '7~~xr?'~ I~.'{&;:;': . j (. ........' . _ ~ For more Inrormatlon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 ~Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com c:; "'.iI- I / '/~~l i:i"~~~J2'!~y-" p" . '-:::> r t-.tV ~~-(~4-'( L'" _ ? ~ ._C:j-- ~- 7"-' /-. '. ~~ ."/ I 711) -'-_.-..~-- ~y!~~p_,__"_,_,,/ (~ ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALt STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS '2 \ _ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL 11171 L- ~~ lL~ ...~ w( ck+~- :....t~~ -Ir- ~ ---- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (6'19) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com /. IA C';:) ~1/ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. -J- REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E.MAIL SIGNATURE i2 I c-4. r-- lA. ........ VM 'c-y B~f/ aJP~ ,/~7'dL~ ,,~ . I U" Ci' ,.,.1.. t. 0Vl,S 0 ./'" . n~1I ^ Y;~;J~ \' /7 )\ V ' 1/1. L....l<,J1l fIJ/' 'jS . . ~,~~"" /~ . cL d U nq - / (. (' i J/..:.rffl'I ..pM:('I1 (J. ty.. _ ./ d~ " ).. '. . ~ .j 1~1t-~ . -:JllJ/Ug)CflWM " r;. - ~ , WI19- ~...F.." For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.c:om I~ miiiiI!l3 TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS j{ ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! 7( We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. i.,,,''t; J c 1 ~ " llt.. J~ /lhl t- _ 1"'115 K.S,.J~J ~ VY bff ~'T',{:~fTI'...)"D -" , i , .J ~;Z (; tZ. c:; fL. 'NC{J1c{.l . !.Il4ev M v el?4 J/ _ / / 1ltIJt-.J. cf!/L (/17- ~ \/ /?Jt/ / );~/l',,;2 / ~\nt1':: Q~~n3t)~; ~ ~ l ~{t./'YL~ I t For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 9'1';102, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com f1 { z..- Uf . TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~ Jw1.e:t ,BV'~Jcc L CjltYJL~/J . C)/TfR~ ~' , 4 . tp--/(I/Fj ;:f;ifAv'"'iU-=- #~<i :Z:, :>0:b6-C.,es Jf?,_ -fN:L'>i';,t.t;I~1q _ (J),j! t, ;,cr=c{t~ C/o / '/ NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL - ~"-~" -_.-- - ~ , -r , ~:je ~/ '- ~ \" For morl:: lllrormauon ana petitions contact: Citizens for '125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com jlZf /lY> (/~ \0/ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ft REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GO,VERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS I '1 E-MAIL SIGNATURE "" " {.~ 7 ~f,'V/~'j;Jf/;~Ir'/yft,Y2il/ ~!t' f([.<I.PIJ. " ' "~ ~I S. Allel1 lqIe-nl>' Cole-- L "1J';:\~:;:~r: ~e/~J'~M, Tle,":\r ~, t,l " ~t-.. " .<1 ) '- ~ } "L J)., l-:rot.~ 'h ~t-t'{a& H ~ .)-(14. r" '------ 1};:~-~ , J SV ?,&.-VI ",a..l bk<: IS? r (~. \ -' T" \,. \' "1.,1) -="C,\\~)C..,\(), '" (.,:\../1,,(1 \ For more Inrormatlon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com J#r~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 2... REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~~) I ,jJk~::~:::- ~~~1h-~ > . t'l)J (~. . &--'- > 7( /o.d{6-Mf4~ fnn' liU rlj77 AaP ~ ~~2b~~~L~ 'ff}'n.j~OtJjJ>n<sx J ~ '-ot-e/1/J.. L fJOi2-,'f!<j A i ~A~~=~ c~ . iohf!(i tlc;~~ ~ Yl 12o\u.eu tv . ,,) -, --""' -L ~\c~o '-~) ",,' . . ~~0~~ . 6 F~r more informatrd'n and 'pet!libns bifulCf: dtizerlsffor~ 25 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com '3''"( ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS I G REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. !If/if) frrLO REDUCE CONGESTION #J STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~~ NAME !2~~t 1'6 ~6 LA f(..t'/~ C" ----1'''''' ~: K:~'1 J;'()<j~ fe-fp,r ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE , \j ~^~~ f/: ~~~_ , ~/~{s~Pr ~c-;t' ,~ q-~".:J ,./ ~f-j ] 7)f:.l GADI Cf/1tt:; O'o)~Pr~4r '_ For m01lt; flllVllllaUVl1 dllU JJli:::u\.lons contact: \..ltlzens for 125 , ' Bonita, CA 9'1902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com JI /'0 m:iiiir!I9 TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. !/u ~ ~It tl REDUCE CONGESTION j~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. . We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~ ADDRESS /' _ T ~_ ~ Go J rJ Lb 3/ f//----' I E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~. r.J?.-k-' # , c, 0/_ {0c ;/ 1V\ ax1~ {iWrY~ f ~ -.JoHN &14rfjfJ ~ B a,y-h OA' 0--' /()uwc1o- l . - j.;\C\r\ (, "tqUi\-CA., c, - w'; ~7r.5 '/ '1/ / , .do Z-) ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. (-lit"'; t1cti; \'L REDUUE UONGESTION 1ff STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delred by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. jJ~1 111"'\ ." \ ,.,..,,,"'- NAME (1~r; ~. ADDRESS ~-MAII @ SIG Cf(1. t:lte..~ rh, ,/~ C IQ.rV"q uv; \I;Q",,~_ p ;l.R6e;,fh CxlAL. _ \, ! v~; n: ,,' e5/)UJY~ nrWAl MtMv<- it r:!!;::J~ - 0 2-/, ~ LoaJIWN 7lul1/!AI ;. For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 17 ["l.- rm:n:r!!I TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. !lLI,ffl ,fuo REDUUE UONGESTION ~) STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. b tJ5~~ ~~ IS ~~~~'- ?e.~~~ ~ Del ~p~ T? OCto. 1 /!:t jII ;/ Iz t+f t !O/hJc;;' -:Jt..""-es AL<;;,u~ 1- 'j',f- JI!-{;-e. L~ ~tL ~{~ )/\,~.c,-, ' ADDRESS E-MAil JLi ;'1If!J\ i (Lsf- 1"1 ~ "'fiT fL , 11f. f^. <-. , -e.:::.. "1 i '1 i 0 -1~flI~1- ~-----I ~ ~ .. ~JL[J~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com -1f ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OV:r~ALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~. NAME 1tcJ1,~ I' ~h !.-:6,r> ~/ I -f;;<"2<"~/7 ./ ~ jL,,_uX'~ ADDRESS E-MAIL '1'110, ~ ----YJt ~,,~- (,- ~J#:Jf r - /1; ct/Al (dITJ;J I [,.-v j5 Mire (1I5 _ L12erlU. OUvYV 10 _ S\l~ 1n!Lha() ~, ~ ,J\^ 2~(c;IUS _ ~- L .. Ilvf1 - ~ ~~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens foN- Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com :f ,t\/ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFK6ifs REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~AIlIlRF~~ , ~tvlA bJfl~ E.MAll SIGNATURE ~ ~i ---=-- LitL~0t~ I ~ /;:?~f4-t:L<~ '11 '1! () }/~t{^,lif.-(;'-- ./04-H("" ~~'Z: / ' -;;t~' ~stt-_~<-~, ') ~ - ~\ l'i'4\\oW\;() \~[)A(\1,\e\""_ \ aA_( 1~4h1< ~(rvu \j , ~)Oit/ /I-1/j\.J,/)U) L ~A1 (}-t(,.J.- tl (~_ C411/\f- i -~ '11; a 01;, 1j / o\,e(' ,\ "'.1.'/, ./Iv , ~ / \ ' ,"--- I -? .../ 1~1(lr\I'~lk 1z s; 1(1. , .r' / 0/ For more information and jQ~titions contact: Citizens for .~ '. / Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor/25.com IVV F!-6 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS YCI\i\dQ ~)\NQv\.OS ....-r- /),j /J ,f , 1,M7J~ (~~ ~ " ){J-- '(\ !Q ov< \. - \ Y\ r:_UAII SIGNATURE ~\\. ()~\~\\~~ ~l.'" ~G)i-.w.- (' !J.~~_ I (/ . . Ge?~f> () . P/ .. /9) ! vlf<<? / -- /., l"/tpjE/ t;4,1tr,:, r..;r----- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com fT. I i-- tf {;, ~ TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ,,~~ REDUCE CONGESTION ~TOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE 14~ ~ S:,\-.Q~. vo~ :., M <D',^,_ ;-l:~' ;1!;;fc / - C \C', ~'\\'~yl . (f I . -:rT; ~:/f/v\. l." -v:J0'llI'W', ~(~ ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICI.+ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ,? ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~~~~'>YJ _ (?-(j, ~~p %tt.. . f01d:J. /?Q 0Y~- .- ~ ) ~/ !..aw<-t!-ML /) . 0:-1-0--..- q~.(~Ll :V'IOt.ll R. C\t..1U \?In/ ~ r Lt lhamb\€1>C: ~Ad2e ~AP/AJ~ /I~\'\Q L- ~ful t j): <<.... Gr:,9;.l 1;:~ -iccJ CC:'.<A. ~- - For more Inrormatlon ana petitions contact: 1.Itlzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7441, 01' e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS /:'2 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION 1~~~---- STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS 11 ./ . . , 4\qL[')~ . .f [ . lL'v?J i~~" \ ~\ \ i'"" h fJG( : tVL 0(\) ()~6U <2...- ~ q /97:8 g(}tL~ "'--"'-~, 'O>f..... L-L.v.~, Qr~ C'" For more Inrormatlon ana petitions contact: ("Itlzens for 125 ""( (9'15- Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS I'J- REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ifJraltP,v-' REDUCE CONGESTION 5~41A/ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL S IGHATURE '--r--- _ ,i( .~~ .~I\ . (---"~ -. ~ ~r~ . . For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com Imiir!!3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS J) REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ,';;/}() f.hnoH',d;'2- , ~fap-ACt (a-rdv. "<; C'll?%; 5&)0 I ~ ~f'd\\r,; m,'1\~Q , ! :::m1vt (L VYlVilo L -A ( -" Ae E' : MA1rocW~1h - ~~~ ~~/.(*~v ~/) - ~ LL<___ ~\CjI3 - 'tu-C9~ ~ I Cfl r fe 113 It{ /'1/3 /q/J tl5/5 \ ~)~\) E;/ Jt r. c tR.<<' (i.. (. .:=-; C l(A / feN D :J () ~ C,1yrlta y tJ4. hv: c 't\~~~1J \ - - ,-- ") J ,,- > For more Intormation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO All ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS r S REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ;fluke! 12 /)1cLelhf'. ~ /~.~~f:~~ v ) C ' , i)i~/i4t( ~:),turuC.,(j-= I Cl 12e i ~~ i.L 8'-ud()~ ~ ,j ~ L Q 12 -t.f:.~o , " \0- hi CYJ q ])PI\o'l<n'O\V"\cnn z: ~ fll.GA L-. At>> f\\J(ft[)1J __ E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~ i'~J~ MO~ 6\Jl. :.'^ ~ ___ \41,s\'.L!\'\' c;--\b----: I f'or more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 ' Bonita. CA 9'1902, (619) 47207447, or eomail www.citizensfor125.com ')9191 "'h'$~ st!tfilD, ()' -~ ~'C4(M(3 VO~~ ~)r.e~ ~_~f'-IJ -Ji ~tL~~ qlll';~ ~~ 1;~\~~ < ~<1 ~ -;-;~ ,"Kf (: (f\.k ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERA(]!;dE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. tfaA,) 1< REDUCE CONGESTION jt( , STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streetsl 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtownl Otay Mesal and North County. "- Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%1 to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ----- ClWi( 7>.~M'k~'- ')TNL A-t06a.AII'lt\~ ~:;'r,\to : 00toyVO 0L.eliCt S ~ ~\l Gt\ \pr\, :::f:E...., 7}--t:z:fi(L-CY _ r\cL~ L\-j V''-'l -. ~,~~ /I\. ~ '\ (?))~'€-.L ./- --/~, 1/;.rq M, /6 AJ It ({f{/ _ ~Avt j) -5p"( ~;5~- <- _ ---" MI\~\L t:.O\\IJSR. \5 ~cJ,6 \:'L~:!.~":-- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 I Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www_dtizensfor125.com L~ ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTIOND(, fo STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ! NAME 2<'~ ADDRESS ~ I E-MAIL SIGNATURE 1 -~ ~()13[~r AND~EoW~ (tJf 1t,:..1d--El/~ ~~ ~4 ~ 'w~M :tl~~ \ss,\\' \. '\, t;/ _,/\1 " . i1'Lf/ ,A L ~) ~ r.' :1).1./111-,/7: ') ~ 0t/, ~ AC;-\.\ ~ (1\1 ~__ )~ {L y. For more information and petitions contact: Citizens fpr i 25 Bonita, CA 91902, (6'19) 412-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com H 1Q!r- ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. '-~ ~ - ~-- , V ~'n-ILp ;;:Z,-",- fJ '~ <~..... 8;;t:;g NAME ADDRESS ~~~,?,,: 'A~&,j (;'/-75"4"6/ , LF.-1"-OQ'( ----rc\: { o-ef' J)e},' 5e:~ar'L Co ~~\~'-\ . e.c~ f:;^ ~A/~Z {' I ~/' 11 I ') ~ \1\1\ g-/-"'Y\A M C;j~ Gv~ \\\~ ~ PtL1'(\j /ZWJ), E.MAIL ) I (f) ~; ~~., </ ,.,J'. . '; For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I S ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUUE UONGESTION Dt. STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. , SIGNATUR~~ a,..;7-' fh~r-e:-)?1 )P1~ ~i- C-19'--f _ ' ~ 5J,~ Ttfr" I L, 'I ) v-olr.tL f t. / UAl NAME Iv( ~K'""",,, /Ie-'/<.. (}td,JJI- )'J1<v1'J~ " Ja~ lUdmA-(I) ( /b/;L:e: G 12-7 - Tic ~k/_ '-i:;e~' OiV/e~ ~1< L-1'L'Ui '])F:MR/Jft GfrUlt-:r/ _ qise\c:t>. ~_ w c.:J (/5 ~ ", ( , - -~ -; 9'A'!fI 't! If \ , f (, <'/ He; j I ~ - ................"r--.. t VL-\Alt'"""l '_0 \.J ... For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com to mIii[!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTIONfJc, ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL , / .... J/ ~ 1? P/77 ~~ :7'€a/.eC-""l 717) te:} Le.~ ~ C~~ . ?~~ -----> . ~ [ <-L..- ~LJ.1 vJ _ lv\ (.~J~A(s Al~.x C;;'(rMl~ lnu.-- An ~,,;-,,.I..Q L /,) ) ~-. (1 id{v .9l1l1 0A1~/~,.Q 0 Q....~ q f <f II (h/It,7fiJ:G~ ~. For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, Of e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com j (4 ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUCiPCONGESTIONQ. ~ ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS ~E.~ >" 228 For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com A"ore,{lJ L f!.../I, "'~ '~ /(JA().{/!L /;<.(/1 f11C {f , \~ IIiiiiI!l9 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUmrCONGESTION'D. C- to STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. SIGNATURE ~"'- ,~0-<:~ ~ ' 4;;~P f)( ~. zJ;;~~<Y?-1/~__ 1~~~~ NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL \ ' 0Y\(\ A' &~~ (S!IY~;:~/S?, ~ If (iN j7 11/(/:: e/<- :(I1l /;! /)----- ~ <OP~!C:\ 81 k,J-P f _ G~'vc -' re tlCn ill~ elf h ~ tUE: / JYl <!YL I Ct:, ((i1"- (f- _ l~}r !'?HAk_!~/J lI:'l-JAI''L , , i2fh)\JI4~I) 1,\ ~R.? Jc, !-diul? b"HZl:14 For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ./ ["1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY.O ~ REDUCE CONGESTION ,[, STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~. - a:J:.' . ~~I~~~~ -"ON'" L We~ '-' c (7,tJIE^-- At:: I'- ,. (t)' ',5 ~ 3d 5 \ \ </ - e or Irj6re Inrormatlon ana petitions contact: citizens for 125 B nita, CA"-91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I t'J miiiI!l9 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ REDUUE UONGESTIOND.c, STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE R\JCDi C'nL-AI0~GU l'Vlit 12 ('cc, L.1) ~y~iJ4~~ , \ / I , C-<-'ult1-- V I I/! A 'I d:") (p." I c4 Q /'., j-t r':!.:}V) A , , For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ('Yav,' J/?-c-t P.r~'yy.~ ~ ~}7'~~4,),> 1~~f)l"(C!J~~~$tq \ ' \::::c.y CJ.,A. , 111,1( I! t1/lI{ r ,';;(' I- ./1 ~'. / D ~.eJ(0~J2~ / /\ /-::~, ;;2~L..:"'. a // '- ' ./ ./1 7l 1'17 ,;Zy:?,,~ 60'-"<'1 O+a,. 1'/ <C/' t/ '--7 I - , ..7,,, _ '..J (1/:1' ---(0___, -___VC'C.1l.;/(a ~_.~.- - (. r 10 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUCEPUONGESTIONO (. L STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. i'^ feJEU.>fE LPAlGbI<AKl;. A \ s~ It<> C P'"=-l\.~ ~~'~? 1 (tj07u-~ tt~:AJ Vkv",-Gt i oJ ,<S'uStiI h fu,sA ( j)~ u 51A /11/ 6AC II. ~1?( VlACld{ tG~~ jL1 An t'1I ~/ '-l . S:;;"/ 50 ilv' Ro)('~ N P>< ~.~ Y}()efN~{ ~,,(2~ /f;. H 11 ' Yl SIGNATURE ~v NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL ~YJ ,;/ / '60 ./ r. ...,..., --f'A,c; .~ "t! ;'-Cj ~?~ <--<------ j~/3~~~ i'i (i{.'- J;j:"jzf; ~,?eh ( ?~'~' P1fY~<< For more InTOrmatlOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 r !lonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor.125.com s- / (tjCJ '() /'1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDEAAl, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUCiPUONGESiIONO. C. ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS 1..otUFO P~~@tV_ .~ Il_,_~ J!J;4 5l-lal'on -K'sm-H:: ~'L ~A(~O;J _ Sara J '~n'i~] E-MAil SIGNATURE <I ,/. t1:t ql ?J!Il (IZ~ {Jj~ _ > 0 I ,~" (\ -}(;:!? . ',.< , 'c') ,---- '\. .'-- -',' <) __-_-~-f'-<'< /,?-f'!':------ , .. --', ,.-'/ .."~. - ::;Vl'((OZ' For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (6"19) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ,-; ;1 tf7) ~7Y- Irl& ImiiI!]3 TO ALL ELECTEb'rE6ERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS \~. REDUUEEPfjONGEST'ION tL~~;o' STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. o.~ ~^ ADDRESS . . '1 /) E-MAIL ~v ::TeAr'eA! ~ ':> f--."~ ,., " \..,_ 1 C', ...;' _ I/,\ , , C \ -')/l. I. .,'~ . !" f j V , For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ~/ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. #-df1V{t~v \~ REDUUE UONGESTION -flr STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS j e4 1) DVV-1I.t[ _ Iu-e.vv\ (~. D,Ju fp'-i ~/t:) 1(/11/ C /VI ,4}J ~ 1:. M.fJtf1EIt/ /n.C6r_ ~.~t-l,~. /, ~e\J lv' 'Y<lJ\" 0 S 1 f(n <..r1- J{ /J G- -: \ )In'6.., fI1011~c,n -' ~2J;1f\' k I.-kl,.~-I\'" > d7 '-r1t ~-rJV/'Ij::(' 5c.. [)" f . n '""~'/ E-MAIL ~ATURE ~ C~~ ) . jI~ LjJ~ (/f,4/7M ;)-)1/1 IJ I;) - 7 v 'C--_.1A. -'" C" ~ I . .,."yV''''\-A c,-<-c-~_.J -- :5~.D~~ / c-_ ','if. -. v( t!: ..1tM o\lli~ -S (t . , -) ,-7 ""-'j /(;// ,., v /'( ,6, r <? -1 ')Tee-, .-- /' <~/~~~Tl~ ~\;t\f\.~~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 12 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or eo-mail www.dtizensfor125.com 15' ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL '.... 77 / r/ "r- m Qj\'l W Lt~ 1)O;t/!/(f~ ~ rA Tv/{. rer )J ~'15 For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Ilonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I' .;4i 3 ImiiI!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~E . ADDRESS fn/da I-Il>lls:t~ ~ ~ ~:;t1q~~:'~ 0m 00_1\ ,-lsir'; kl1 8'dl-,<" L J#IIt-( UUi f!lYJ,A ~ (j )~~ €c1;J( ~ o ~OY101(L al/l~e(9J1l t!vnll.:a ?"i!OA / ?VI IlllA~)t._f1:: JU(! ~ 11 (,e) A t,OVl 'Jrl't :: /7 . /.-7 . '-~.........--- <-- '1-4 ":-~ '} E-MAIL - '7 7 I I . ----. 7' r7i+rJ>:. 1/7:;'A16'';4<--_''''3'''' "'''/// ~- .7 ' 7r-~' //4" ...("~ / /,~/7", .,., .... /'/ \,jV\.I' ~iJ\J'- ')\ !: \~z> C) \--i '"f1,,) j~ C b1;J ~lA...,j For m~re information and petitions contact: Citizens fO~~'C ,C/ ,/ //,( , ',f Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com /5 ~ miiir!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ,... . E-MAIL SIGNATURE N(i(\\( o,J)'^\ \ \(l c ~~~; ,~1 ~:N" _ 7 -L " t- I P(.' __-' ~ CU,) l~b ,....kJcc /::5- --- - J '" " , (, ~1\'_U Ji:,A <'l~ ....- i:j .' / - .' - ~l'f11)l\\00-'- ffi(W(~)IQ2 !'f\o~vO (d:)M(7 _ -D' ((/KY 1/' /1- Dr/Ill' .{.' t 111 ~." 4- , " ' f //1 00-1 i N, J ,/ LX ;M{ ! HtN(2Y 6\)T'{frC~ LlrS'f-!c/J --7 1. c /17 c!'"~ -1-"",,,,.\ [., CL~~ .,-/"'} " f' "I'--, ?'7F!,j{le ,~'; ,II.'}!-" " i?, t.''it/..qtl/< f) ,:','.:' /<."",:, ,-: , ,-- , ~,' J l"...IJ[./'2J..<-It..., 1. it.( i{f..J._,.."1fi '" / .. ~- ~. /. /;1 ' I /, ~ '"'-' ,d ,i'" L/ ///' ,'/t' J-.l.JVl/ I"V 7 4 t ) :; l < 7 '7 t V); 1," c, -- ,.' ~'~ p-I 1\"-,- \....; ~~~-~/.... ~ /";"",,,"h...~~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 4'12-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com /7 ~.3 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL .~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 15" /171) ~ ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL;STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 3 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME 00-", Ie f~~,.),-; ,,-?/,< o . fc<~'.' & f~'~- }Jrti/ttJ f<cJ/AL '\~\rB ~DbL ~ /0'i""L?5ek 'Row", s. ~l..:LN">J G \~'\ "11\ c-e f 'tW/( 1.. LI.'./)7k:r ( / C--fAvVVf7V1) t>l>1::ri) Ire lr;r r;r41-/ICZf- C!arbhh.A Ghilfe=? p;;/k~~f ~ j{I<<;/hM f3f}--f5" ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE --I /- / y;" .~ I'/'V' ,I:;. '..-<(Jl'_--<!. ~.~ . rC9(~ ( ~S~ ~d' /' 'C}77 '7 For mor'fG III1VJllldl.lUII allu ptan.IVII:t ~UIII.d(";l.; \..l\lzt:ns for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com Ii. ; / pr) 6j~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! /.. We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. N~ ADD~E~ (/ R~ Yj~ A~t{F:/~ \ '.:::sO.sUl.l/~ tli<d nJ., D. A~ f(t6UYlJt M ,DR.1J1 Cny"(-, \ ~ YJ(A p& 1Q.c Rr 15t"lfl llOc)Sf\f_ I E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~ ~q 'q/,;? If) ,>' ('0/1 ce 1tt<7/;1 ~ ~\ ~ ~ ~ . For more mrormatlon ana petlUons contact: ~ltIzens for 125 . I -. Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ,/ I 'J ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! 2 We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~~rol~n ~e;rrlcH-d{J U:;((/l\j'5H yftVf .::5 hRe-AJdn 011-kes . ftL.l. hAJ 2l(, PFen ~4-._.-~ 7201' 72-- ~ -'"1-C; 10 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! 2_. ...~ We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE :--<- / /'v1 rA Y eu)' f fA O~5AfL ;AL#I'-~_ ~,) \ ft Jen'(\\ V ~ ,0 ! ~~~ Cf~~a(~ . . '\ \ O~K1yu&)) .~.Q .pJr~ For more infOrmatiOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~. z \ ) Imm3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805;--- . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS qj),sdJ~ ~IIVfr _ E-MAIL SIGNATURE I/Ql--:S pa{na(L(~~.JU r " /r{ '1. ., () jjc.A'1e..~) "d" '?-?'"'k1 :~ l.t, [, {l.-e / Jlr"k ~ - Ltvlert- /)(I,'-<a I v~~= /K ~ OJ" ('C:"- ~W{'N:(~,t MaX~~~021i ~O\'-~s -: ~t;,. (], ,j.; , :f ~ t> \0 i{ 1\1 ".lU ~(;)\.Ie"Z- , ,5fmrtJl {'Lllk kJ~ _ ~ riA ,"""'- (",.~~/f;~~ " J<--~~ e~ ,:;,0, ;1);;'(- For mor~ infdr'mation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com /a 9// '0 '-:> 15>0 11/ C['CW 'yo (R(h~ . C') \../ :2 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS 'f'co 2rtL- ~V -JewA.'lA e~~ E-MAIL ~~~~ ) , For mon: infOrmatiOn ana pemlons COntaCt: I.ltIzens for 125 . Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com .0 '-I/I!AJr0~ /&-;J.l2i Of/A JtJG tR. IttJ f, r;s G )1~ 1 e Vobln IVUir(GV'l~ 0 \. &!,. l-rr-;<. /J~*_ mC1{'fard <:!--L.o{/ _ j;o~J~;;~~ ~~<v.\ Gi l O~QL. Z/ ( I SIGNATURE ~ ~oJ_ ~1It?7<;;u; 5 (Jr? , ...--- lfj ImiiI!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! "} ,&..~ We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. SIGZ~ 14 I NAME ADDRESS ~"Q, CCf IM.t 1'4 ~~~~ ~~ ~1J2:\ ~:~~~\ 11 ielfVl()'" f1YlhJ /1\'J2 ~ -' At, t{ rf y\p\J ~ ht'lS . - r f\:.~ ~? vl1 bi- /fl ce; f71" jlI#l-CLcV:v&~ JVIARIti; ~M310 di C E-MAIL /0 ~ ''11"0 . 1IC/(Z; . ie~~ fI f/\ :hJ,bp/'(- ~.f ,4t ~ IJJ/JP/CO fy1t -2~ y/ ,,- For more infOrmation ana petitions contact: Citizens for 5, Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I') 2- Riir!]3 TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL 1.i20-- tJf.r '/D tV ~>~?r~ ~1 {r:. ( /4et?'": For more Inrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 12 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I 'j , 2 ImiiI!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL .II! ,;} f..' r,J C;.q, / For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 1257 1,~ (1 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ::h5hW.z/ he/JCir YO _ ~O)r aia- jJ1r[l~b'~ l.e~co, 1\ ~f'1 sf5Pd,fa -rnb U 17) _ M~f(;fJ V/A?4!J(,c , ' "'1/\ G-\l~ ,t-e ~ G :SA: t:i;iJ5'1 -J ctt- . -, Z < ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDEJL,'-STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS _L REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that S,R 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~ ADDRESS . 4AJGdJ9~;CE \,/~~'- ~ MtIIllt- l/MPJAJ.dj (}e V1 g B ' ~()( U I V\ @16'{( 'Pt.:1- /J L{,()'T4 t..tj U ,p/ ()u fF^ t-t\~ t?\A\\Avt~~OJ~J ~ \Wil '~'_ (i\Qi~t'- ":LL- E-MAIL SIGNA URE 77 !1"1 ;-,. " ...-- G't")'l_t.0.('-~- Z.VL1.<-' -=; V (;:'~ II-'If !vI \ G ft; fl- '/.e' -? /-7 ~1] /"" 1(.,,, , Sill) c,C1<.. :1 (" --.-.. -;:.7") / ' ~(-"""-""a- "~ ~ ./-' / ( ;t~O:~I?A~' 41_C~~ . (-?/"'/,#J PJ.!/)I/J/I / \, . For more IInormatlon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 'lTT ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! .2h We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL v_ SIGNATURE 1rLa~~ (/~ c:r ( -VIf 77 7 I'\t G..'1 CA~ Uu1t VI ('^ - " ('...po> -Ie'" J) . //~t!!fZ. --u-rel:::~r\5\iC\V\ _~ _ _ _ B j''' / /- '....- ;p;- 1);~7.;rfif~;"rs -u~frd ;;;;- f l' " I I - . R. ,II: f. 'ftc1ri R. IC~~~'''/' ir,iUl'cH For more infOrmation and petitions contact: Citizens for'125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com t'--'" ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streetsl 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtownl Otay Mesal and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%1 to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ji~~j,~ I vi /&V!(; ~ /I i0tJd" J . I f(f/a'riu. Po,;dc) r;~ CC/I?I , r ( L ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE (,-,.t4~ L ~ ~ 7Y9~~ ) /kluy;O lu/rdn lURr..,/1,'tJf> - ~ ~ (e M l /::b1lJ "'..5 -' (~"iyj; CeJJ'yq; ~ LAVJ4orJ' .4 l'l5f-Ll\N'-f, fdft tJ\~ IiIJt c _ fO IQr ".L ' /YJ1 ur-f' 1 1(1"(1 /1i(....V f -'7 " 7f'1/fr/ { ~~ r . ~lN7'r. ]~A_"/ SVCf'97 7 ;;:vA-OIl 1iJ\"ZP'l2-, .\ For more infbdnation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com / ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS "AWI'1\.l.SO~ - r::; M E-MAIL J~ ee::-~ ;;l :K~~~ '1- ~. r f ~tJ ,- I-J--- -~- ~ I.. ;7/ / .~. . / / . ;:., " '~.' u" .~ ," ,," ,'.- ~,... ,.,...JIJ't.. I i ~ 'L,.,-c:.:Jl! ,~L . .., For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com \ ~ IBiiiI!m TO AlL ELECTED FEDERAl, s4;..fE lH~ollL\)FFICIAlS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. "'AII(/~IGNATURE \J',,' 4' /1 i.... -#..:;I:.2/ '~~Cl~~::: .. ~ /"', . , , (1) ,. ,t.. V f.~rJf1',k ., /' {)", /I ; j/ {. If' f" t' , 'I : / . ..'~ '~<1'/ jl I ~/--:' :- Cj/7~z. ;:;;[: c~~. il! L} . ():- .<, /'~ ,'" . /-I- / /, .." ,.t '. _ It\\.: <-0 /J :;~ .. " ," .,' I { 1 1 -.~ if ri/7 jr"-' '_.1<2 .'- _/1- ":c..v~// d.,j.~ '. II _~il/~"i.T'/{/"IZ:f' v +t- 'l.i f / -......" "- "I' ( L ql( iHiif/[t /~~'f'rr'./... / , /. 'j-, I, / I '-I- .&c../t [f:~:p;/ ' , "-:-:/~.o;'I? ,):~ f.('i _'"~'-_r~ ) .!L. ,,~.,,;., (),/-:2)5'''' 6;( .,' '=-' ~/o Jr~~ 1F:';/ /:~"~' J 1:<-/('<- -Ie"f [//1/,'/1 (:,'-I(c/,;,'(I"'''' , v For more information and petitions contact: Citizens ror 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 4'12-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ADDDCCC Jf/' J4 c; -G ~h \ ~ , 1/" <~-~l.,L.-"V ~ ~ ~ ( -7/.,. ./ { /-1.'%1/#4.',' ~P'''' <:. \~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STAfEXHrL6J~FFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. c c NAME ADDRESS Altl d (e W ACPVfJ} WlY1[\ Cy!c t -rJ\iA!c(I\NJI) < (2OvANt) \lIArD \( t p/;7/t (;""/2('4 ) 8.dl ~ ~ '1"'<':1 ~O){"- (.St'(O/l;) 1 --:)01) If A L.JI7/t1Zt;:,() 1 hl~Clrd6 krrCV) JrJ 1 A4>.fJ (j2~-,l.UL- J Chnstllln Ct':,nercs 5< 'Ef~kf /vf-klLUZ(_ (en}!" ... ""':'" 'C''' ,- .~ [' ') .i -r \ ',' ", <c.. '1"-.-, j." V -,- ~.' .,-.~.~(;, ,.~~_ ,0 , Q\~ "'/"', ,-' / ~:,.. 'L<_ L-- --" 'r,,.' ..' / '.,{,1 For more information and pe'titions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com "\ ~ .r; s ./4 c.; IS-' \ ':, ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE NAME ~ <>-.ur(( fv/ c:z:.o... _ ',Ivr.' Iro ICD tVi fL ; /D j€c~ ~. S\u~:F- ~ I~ ~ ~::fa'{t ~ ~)~ 1r;:tI~ I~jj"r :;~ m1#i:2)~ 12<L.~ { ;1- ("..2. c/111 )R. 1-1.:"",;;,,- ;! . I ,') ;7, leti..? '. ~ I} '7/';/,/'.\ ,A,) ( Uti' .-'))~> /-Q.::::~~'-- , A';' Ff I '<C" {:, du / /J-;/~ . , i, 11.1'. "';:.{.1..cC;, J I 1'1 i ' 'It I" tt '.f .,<f.CcI.-C" '11 Vi' i I /J / / / " I'rv t:WC"J,N"1-, 1/'t?/../tTp,if.t)".cz,t.'-, /:~ F;~ ~;; "'~J!A.., V(~ (/q/l'.:, \-/J(a..<--,~... V,[,?'~ CI (' - C' J' - J Mtu1'hAj i. 1 ('lID ,0 ""';,)/~./<- ' - ./ For more information an~etitions contact: Citizens for 125 Ilonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail ww.i\l.dtizensfor125.com <;-~-,. . /. ~ . "~pL.-"?"-- _ "''''----. c 'r ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDErvk'S~l{ ~D~6CAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. v ADDRESS 919 !O E-MAIL flLp 6nm (Xr'" \ \~ LV <.. For more inrprmation and peti\ions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com h ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAl, STA':i'A~~ (~FFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE .(.,C ....L. './V, 1'\\ \'(,\'\'.h, --.!. l.l~~~li'-~'C (~A;:'f:..t L).,..,(, ~'-_ ,,~,\ Jv~, J (, ~ ~Y?7rn")~l/ ;fJ()-, - ;,} /' 0"-;. [(' .,--' / ~ U ~~~,.k Cll~ r~~ ~ljjL: t, . u ,~.. :(sj(.:;&./Lo/3 .~" CA~ ~l;7v7JtdiJljA-g~ " I! \ . I '-D1- If"'" / ,,',' ,(" !~/ ,/ /, i(/A, , ~ "-c' ",<,:.v.. tLi2 tf!J.,1: D iLL /,; {z ~t::a~ JJJ t.. .;:, ~ '. I C'~ /(" l /(L.{! , edh'-~pv.~!~ Ided -"/IL-// it" ',4,.1',-;;<.\ ,.' (V /t::J 7J_ ,It - " (a~(.(!C~~ II (<; 7/'-'" ,,:, {f- ctLi;(t !! /'1 ,o-v'1.,,-vvi' For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com t~ 1Jq J'f 'T~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. SIGNATURE ~C;= '""~ 1/~~ /n':'-c;;;?-~ ' "-&. l:l,;Ic/J L'-C:~I 12-_t/~ I \-,/- >)1 :'''(1 . (UiHlt.Dkb ./ .?l/l-<.-,/J--J.---. k, \ 1 f'r':"" 11; , ,,,''':.,. ".b .' '/-1<-'.", n \. ~ ./ (~------- ~ \/-L/IC' (0'cv" NAME 'cJe..-'/..v S,.,rl'c, i'o itA '~ . ~ilrJ,>: . tUAl'tU , '/ 'f:L-:n ,lien Ct-{1t'7~1 [) YlIl", Mc;,rr'JIM. _.. ...""~/al I , ~ V,\)2:.IV\n 11IMI~U\Y1KI C) M.A[!: DE rEiN '\i1/' I'V\L(I'C 1I pt 1..-0 \.)~ U. tL (\ IlI"( A cc ~,t ' - r , , '-' \ r\.{""(< ,. l,,"i'"'\O\'i'Y\Qf1.- ~k~~ j '~ t' e"- , Q Ij "L1\ \\, "J' flltl.:, . . ' L _ \( I' _ ,1 _ "I 'r ,t'I~. ,,' \At..\.\\! -r\(A;\', ) ~\ I'" ,.J-r \'\ ,-' . :'/ l"l!'f'/' "v Ii ,t.', .//J /.J/'o- .~ ;I/.lVA 1\'" 1\,.,.\ 1- ,'! \ \' '" \, \..-' '-" '. " IC!~t, \-i ' ~J \ ~ w,. \"\ \: ' " " 'I \.>, \. '. c...,.J i (( ;,,{q /J."l +----r-- \111'1 (;\ lNlll For more information and petitions contact: CitiZ~S for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com t'., k~ (,,:.:L....-u.,.L /11 :,) ~ TO ALL ElECTEltiE9ERAL1 STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. {l1 I') REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~E ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ,:O{@;fcrUAIL ~t )\\Er:cI\?E;.l:-\cT &-1.~ ~rY{,?4<z ~()~-;k- rta//{jI; (lJ1'a/fJy.l/er A(};iU; ~ Oi\,\'n PoWli/Q') '3 I . '\ /' \y' ~JnY L1t0 <::fIEPM A Nt t="" l \:\~ J-i r~ J." /.;'j If It ~ R / !l-r; QI(}(~Q Co.nta I u.f)o , 0; \tJlO ~r{\;(e? 3 ~ 'Cr SO}'1 [:] /-1- ~ :; . // ~,__,'(..o(>' ~ ~6'A /'; ,. .',l- , ~ O~',f'\ ...\,'\ 'tob)" ~~>R-'- --1: !J,,,)q;"'il"'l., ,,{rn<,7?\ ;; c. . ~ / For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor.125.com \'1 IDiimm TO ALL ~~if!No (5&.(6FFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL 1/(/.1/ lJ~~Ik~~ _ f< 6 grif(\ h r.1 t'foif'!_ pi ),-:) 1///:'//' .') ;t /L (ilLurl'i /<;' , ' ( .' ! J~1../ rh-vu-- 15 ; ~ (~.>li'J~ ~21) ~'<-- C-h' l<;:'.c {! rev",,;c. (! .I : i ! /~/ - ~ 1/?!f'itVl/' . :h~ ""--.~V;\ 4-w- ~ \..J' Ci \\- D '-f~ -><) 9 Ut"~'lPd' '. ....,;.z.--""r I ,~_.... c <:x.f'J\. ~\~ ,~.~.~~ "~I 6:'), ~ (' '1/" '.:/ 7/ j ..,. 1-./' ~//>i{.- '., n2!! ) ) (~{ (_ ',i / / - I:... . ., '1' .... .\ I ., . I-F!": I '-I,.t"t! 1\(",\11'; _) ',e, 'Ii:{j/i/}-.- /J fl' /" l't.. '. / ! / ,,' rt1uJi( O;vUfeAMT~ .' ' . ~) ,iH4/4 tftaf)' , . For more information and'petitions contact: Citizens for 125 I Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com .1(1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS jt; REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E.MAIL o -' i / C / U#rl.Lif' .JlrcoD I. l)D'r' \ . ~~ /~(~ l7t L.{v,,-,I//~- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com '*1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! 1"S" We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ..J ,'It {tf ADDRESS E.MAll :......-::: Rl nSl'h MoYl]'(,Q, s.J.r(1~e2-_ ~m(A ~~~,Jo.-_ \jei rt/il CvvrZ' J\^u\,~ L. ({~ - ---J~N 'P. (!nj'.l/, For more mrormatlon ano petitions contact: I..ltIzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ,0 11 / ....-'-'- ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS /~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME (!~~u.<,(J( ti1;-s. e ! ADDRESS E-MAIL 10)- ? /7, / 'frY/cJ ~,(~. '}/Jd ~bf. .0~- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 12$ Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor12 c ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICI~ ~ 1'f REDUmrCONGEsT'IoN Pit STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS 1f~LJ1d~tl/J~ .9 J6A~ G,LL ___ "~ J)vt~V1"M~.ffr~ ~ /1fit(} ((?;2(JtfJ/f(~ I E.MAIL SIGNATURE r {lJz",j !.6va/L ~ - -r(o'<-4A<::.o.,\-\... .'''5 ~ /~ .J . ~ . ~Jil,J fy 0/ -.-J €L...'t5?JI t-1 ryi"J _ " /lUI/1 V!i! /I/,?'/C( ,. ~ 1~~I.p,.)....cl (C. / ~// ../"./. ~~r. /' I /., ~ -, '''1 ,..- i .'i "~"', ,. '; 1(- l-"i .. ;, ...... ,A"'\TC\\"IFrlF /,1, /;~./ 'v )\.'~J FT\ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for '125 /. '. .- ., Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com > ,:..--:.. /I~C' ) ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS) REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. kfl{)lV )~ REDUUE UONGESTION ,p6 STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. ", . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805.' . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% ~, . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. '" We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS O/JveI-LJ )lcrrl:~z, '2 If? C-m\IL 2- :> / lVtM&L ~e~MVOC Jt1A1L1l ,..j A I e.,',Sc-,.r I (1 f): q;e!; !f 11/ ') 710 '9/3 /1/5 JI\I\\D1 \,J~\,flltJ ~J~ 1" 0 ~(k W~(J, J ~~~ N Pr~9 ,lcJc~~,ffY~))J For more IIlTOrmatlOn ana petitions contact: I..ltIzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.om TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ~ S REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. #l/f/ . . REDUCE CONGESTION Jk( STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. II tr SIGNATURE ,0 rt:/:,' S NAME .fsbrc/,c<v< j ADDRESS E-MAIL rp 111 , / '// ill J- , . 'j Cf /~ -t: -- /! I ;~..-. ,p,,~ CAp,"" i J " l' '-I._ (- <,.~ L - t'I'):"V-:: I ' '/' 'y _ ; I \v.. . " '.,/ r For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FE~STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME (J~ (/ I ~'ut ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE : qlq 100 efVl4t.JJQ:.-.., f~ ~ fU~k~ ~ 1'1~ bVU,'-,f.,S . f1GI:,J'lft w. / ) 11>,'1 ~l~ .~IL-.~ ~.oj~ ~:tt '.Uv M " IE I,' t Ix'- V ,~. \./1 :., j) ,..-) U( l 1/1 jJl~~ 9// . _\J~ __/ l , -,.-~ "':-"l, . / ill! ,Pili c, . </ .: '-0 . " ';1,'/4; . S I{) Co .(:<t:, ~,~(' .() 11,: 0_ J:11.o I Jill. '" -:/",./7:::, ~ ~-.) f 7 ~ I 'i 0.- v' r c.; ) ' .4-;.,' e.1?"),\,~ / I I Ce.-. ?/1//f!/;'2.- rVl more inf~lation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 t! r Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 4'72-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com i \./ -/ /lA.' '-~ '- " C"".-f-t'i t1 /, L . " i 'l (" .i l~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~ ------- Ki je' ?Ki-' ~'lej- >. tl)/(!$ 11'fp:r7~,. "bt.t<,,,r' 1c " - " '~M -,. (;0 Co "/:7 n t ~ / ~ /f-,ftA'''~.J? Ci:zrj ~//J '5 CD#- " 4 VI s 14. 7/ q /1 81ftn.y A... / Fr?I!I\;('e~~--.l3./J(,# 15 ;:~~cY49/9/iJ For marl!; ,mormi"'On ana petitiOns contact: Citizens for 1 2S ~a,L'" ,f/;/?>e, Bonita, CA 91902. (619) 472-'7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com Ie Uf~1 r 14H[K {ill (; I!i~ - f~ /~<4"){!4kf :~ - I / '~j- i,c.I'n _ , <c.j1r."" -, ~o~ 25.0 2-. 'I'lll #14<- JCjICj / I ::t;;:' 1(// >- . Ill/(~;' /':-- j: ( 'f 10 ~ '-. , . ll. \j...)--- '-_ - .';[v(.I)-:'-" J' f! v;; . ~. II ~~" 4'..~j; c' L/ 9'/~ ~~ ) G Q Vy) r ff ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL ADDRESS NAME ~{(P;fC^-{ CYI'Y" - - ,A F '7"'>i- ~. ~/o,c/:~,-- ~) ~1 ;i~1p&1 ,c.-'/..,.:.""<-...e-.:.... -- ~ -'-L~- \/ i/- / -) /i ~A... fl2.- ~,'1 ]J,,~/ '1"1 i) Tiler If Ij j) .-~ 1'.1 . ..,J ;_ I _.') 1-;/1/ ').. :tE~5~~;i For more infOrmation anCl petitions contact: Citizens for 25 __/'/- Bonita, CA 9"l'iI02, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensr125.com I /e( ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ) )-/1 S ADDRESS E-MAIL . \ a...-=I A/c-/( If ( G)/l 1)11'1I'€ fJv.rh/<"'1 lb~- )V'fr(k.. Sf?t.IOv( ~\j / '--------- ) "'- 1)Jj//li<Pr j?d'IIS (1:::J~::~c~- (J I C Nlr,,'cl ,/(1heJ,CZ {Il~ (t'e i'A P~D,,~ ,.\ l1-\--\' ii.' I f'(Yj/},?(~;, ~. r~:~~re information and petitions contact: Lltlzens for 125::';/'" (':::<~IJ- .':: ' } Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com :e. 'J- N ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAL REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown[ Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%[ to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE '1 \ !' I Ii.' Y'I ' , . / /11 (:<<x~/ttt II . f\.c iv 1~1A\<'()~ \ (),:e 1. 'to?!! S lorJ>!c'I-1J ~~y\ l~,\~~ - LeGr,', ~J t-\oy( p #~'lC' / -if. . 407 , V'~~L tlf1C clr( r ^.- . l!!. ~ < , ~ I ]fi,,,- .~f ~ II\)^'- " ~-, ',., (/ \..-/7.'z - ? /' .It-o/ (" .'- I /"'; J ' 1- \n ~ , / .lliL ~;, {) ~ I (? (.--)/-----L - . -. ,/~- ~~~ -", ~CLdu-c c _ ~/rs-:t~ (;27(4. c.. <<. -~~.. /0 :Lf~ D ,,/ c ~1 C)V2efJ / R "1 /' rt ~n>>~ ,GJ1L'2- t (j <"';L!J!f ~., I..'. ',.~!' / 1 ",,'1 .7.' (! / . ,"'_ I .... /.( " ("~ .11. , ( !~ 4-+-U- J /f ut, ",' A: For more information.\an'd petitions contact: (iti~ens for 125 .1 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com , ,J J C( () /_.-/ d N miiii[!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION 0.0. ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ./~r(if7d~ -- :::z r~~~~ j ~~~~:~~ '-x;,/ /.f d/J ,/; ',!~Vld,(~~'6';~;'tl~ _ . ,- fUr" U' J ,,~ /kN/'CQ E-MAIL I 1! 11t \~It~ ~,-L/L~-dt/ , ~/ /,! T:;;'-'CDs> trlc '" b (- ( tz L- ("/ t-// o ?/dj{ ".'/ll/(Y~ ~' /f.A', /,/ "' . - ,_ i?-U'C- '{//:/?/.?L (." of / "Jt:'A...t ~'L--C'LA._- .AL-L' !.t.-/v-el~~-I J il(~\^L (1;,,]" d 'Y lil'/IO frJ\~-~~~/', ( .,-ci/ ( ?~,"U)":_'c' - Ii --..--......... \.. - " ;/ (fi? '3/0 ---j .L;ZET/ For more Hlrorma~lon ana petitions contact: I.ItIZf.:I1S for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail wVlw.citizensfor125.com ( r 1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION [).L. b STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS \.An flI ((] r ue~fQ :, \'<Y,L~,^,d 'M~ ('1 (--".k lJ ~lf r;;/.~i~r, ~ E-MAIL SIGNATURE it J'e Y"t'A !h 4- rZ TIIA/ il1 n 12.d- pa~;;}l/~' /"6 '" ~ ' =-%~ Q:, a~ \1[1 G'i>-ct~~o-- .17?h r!.. - VI {J-L) r I( /c ; 11 ___J^f)TII 'f(C-{pp- 't qAlo V; 'i ~o fit p:y/r)j~ ''1''( u (-<::: tJ.YL" <_ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com , " t \/ I ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION OeC- to STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME , ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE " ~ , ~7J{)/./;U;iJ ,5'Tll:r: J 'C fth///' /!;;::h/-f//L ;? / I~-rr; ///'1,":: l ~ ('/I . !(JA HCN~ C SCA'7t€Jr, /1Ioe1f~ J_, CJ/Jlh V ;:Jt{/1~ iI~~ ~ /ll;;/1117 Mj)/~ ("-- ~--- 1.h4- ,,'1lql1) ,., - .Jq V~ 1/ . r . ~_,C . ~ '1r~or~' J-,tJR1ltrJ/7'Z-t3L- ~. f('tf ,t!' ~~~3 ~Z., '~ For more ml'ormatron and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 llonita, CA 9190'1, (619) 4"12-'7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com l~ miiiiI!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUUEUONGESTIONO(. ~ STOP GOVERNMENT BELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. i' ! \/ l;u;te~ it il /1 !eo Cb-/ .s . 'T%' 25 i J ...~c~\.f/~~-S {i ~; For men for 125 Bonita, CA 91YUll, (OW) 412-7447, 01' e-mail www.citizensfor125.com --." ~4ik ,ti ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL! STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUUECONGESTioN~[. ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVESR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets! 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown! Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL 6JlltrJifiLLt JbN~ 10(,,l/ A~/) ~LLS 13~~1 t:;~K~~, (,' Je.ue.( 0 WIf /f.IJJi b{l" \--,.. ~d'\';'Y'~ -- , '( V , <L., R) ::x ._ ~ For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 4'72-'7441, or e-mail www.dti1.ensfm.l..25.com \ l1 ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUCiPCONGESTIOND. C. ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. r'V'"'J11l../ 'jan-eTkJh1l tZ. /Cen~, 'C~! 1 \ (-tv ~ t7tJ/L/O (f1LVIH/~ ~ e! / '. - I 1--(frr C A\~",- 6- f~!fC~ 1 11?/l;tJCIS'[O J {-) I~ f1f ~;~/f~ A L. (I' (;. (\~\ If .'~ r, . ' I . C ,..I 0(.l. t'1I\ ~ \\0' C. ~ (fJ . ~rutl1A J--7iJ.ALC{). For rnor~ information and petitions cont~ct: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 9190'.2, (619) 4'72-7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com Qi1 . !tit f \. NAME&,,-a...Ah MI,,~la 1 S;~n"" j \, --- ; H ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUCEEPUONGESTION O. C 10 STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~ NAME ~~At .~f-A '~'YCb Ct (/y....<:-.1,n J-n ~ ZiJLLo ~'D Iut eodr) qUe J rr-- tl.fl-GI/'?-^""^f""'" fS:~t&4. oAfLt.tVI()r t 1\6..fA I\vtt [b .7' }) . //)~7f:1 &~)'L ;(jj4'-k'r~'-' } ~~1~~ iXL~X~~,1, .~A i;{ . "flU'S" fj f')('0tJ") ADDRESS E,MAIL URE yr IS -r 1 r<;, ZflLI I~ L/ ,___ 7 , <J <.\ -~----"- , >;, Go c.- f-~. ~o~~ f/ '" ~~~ L._ :) -,. " For mor", mTOrmcltlOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com 11 ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUUEEPCONGEsT'IoN' ~C G STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~~oJ brJ{ C t '[).tA12i L) V(('~ ~(l /)\0 , \hfY\~ ~ fJ71A tiN /J4 j ~ ~~ / ~ ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE NAME v~/) )r/ ~1t::A .i:, 1/. T'~G..-~1 [Y{)E::'Cl-- ~.ql't77 :?~ ''3 ~AVC- qf7tj~ ~ j4/qy q Ir ZlVtPh/t!clU, r PI/Me. M'\Li ""0"5/:::" J l:,R~ v C' ~ / 7 'f ;- ( ~ - ./9 / <rJA (/ / c4Wv'I1t?D L. If fA ""IBZ ::" ;1 (1it .. .. ~ ~LL# ",,,,L:-> "ZtA ?:1~~ ./ /-1.,' ~'/ \~~~" }f4'/;./.~n (;/ t;t;;c/ , ~ ) 'I 7::- //'A ~/l:) I i~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for '125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-744<1, or e-mail www.dtizensfor-125.com -----" /51'f :t:l5 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. c. ADDRESS E-MAIL UR ..... / J 7 ~!j1 (~f OIQ72 ~ 7 u F ore information and petitions contact: Citizens for 12 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ..~ ,~/ :~ . .. - \~ \. ;:rt:1' fU? W fJ2 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAt:;-sfATEAND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The c<;mstruction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS . " ... E-MAIL SIGNATURE .J 1'0 +4/~ ~4d:#~~ .~ 7'/.d ;:;:;:l;;r~ ~ )6ati\erri>t' For more information and petitions contact: Citizens fOt 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor.125.com (I- . , j TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! 2 We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~\-001~,~- Ile 1?I.e rJ!MJcEc, ~rJY7Li; SAffi ~E:'l'lN AN ~D _ ,?W;{ Gi/ Jf;l1la<- Utef?'ZV~ Cj {l;l ~ t1 (, ~r.o ~~y)r\-l{ ~\G{' ,1 E-MAIL ,1 . ICfo /-.d7J yC, t./ '7'/71') q (1;0 - \!Il.,,+u A\VLlvCid>> $;t ?'L~' t' - - ~~7A ., ~ f;fiY1lt /';:~::e mrormatlon ana petitions contact: Citizens ;~25 qt{,l!7 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 10 . '- .r~rJ.",i:;?'~(-- ~/,_ r " ,el c) I -' c'1 1.))/. z<< r: ok!. (,..., :&r - <PJ ( i / mil&! TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~EJ0(uA r~(l Jy\~-l~~A1JRfl4- ~l j(\A'. C,rep(\ C \ ' -' - . ' ) \ rAY'\c. ~M,,~t'-L ' ~-;;;ffN (VJf/-WN 4 h pze E-MAIL \,it.. ~ ........ P\ke \L, C h Ie \.;l-t'\i~ ~ \ v' ?" L LevI ~ \ \ Ol'lfA, !pZ.-!C! P;/lit../r'S 8 JlvhC~/lt 1M II, ~s. ;J) v ~ L '1"77 \ '/"17) ~J\ 'r 71\7) '1~..i!t wdl~~ For more infOrmatiOn ana petmons contact: 'I.l.tlzens Tor 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ( \\ 2 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS - REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE (1,,~^ ,)M~ trt 9/"I0l.. ~~ y- ~ ~~ ',-~' , . . )1 ;0 rl4 ,J I) /10 \ v- <;'I/U;H1, 7 ~r/ if4w71"'- /iL {fe, Ie ~ JL; ~/;p( dYfP1Mv'cf, ~{j/c<- J/#;d~ 7h\'~~ ~I~ hce /Jl/tl nO. S a'~es 1a'7il/ c./S,'l '1~5 7/1 IjD For more mrormatlon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com \~ ImiiI!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! ,.....) /. We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL I Q\'11'3 ----- r '1, Ii a r1 J3U-ltrD (~VUa~f4l j 1 4!4/!//lj:'held f/~ ~ k- (. / ' I q I <0 '\n Cl \:)__ P< '0-,>,:> (1\ c:;" rJ- 0_ "'\ ~ "YElSl""{' ?~-= 10. S:~) I YA ' ;1/4-11# 1f/ ({.~ /, (~'. (14, '1)7 SC; 2-()b,~~o ~t IU" 1 (C - 0e(G\ktN w}qLltn I~ 1111 ~' !4f(Juf~ ~ 1/1)/ c '\\"\b W \' y\ \ t f c.~ ~t :n i{ 'I,ll Gwe'" f"~CD~ V,.~~~{ J ), -~({pl L01J;J'~ 3 ~~' For more Inrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 "Ui1q Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com j "I ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. <, ...;." -:--,i' ,i(l.MAIL SIGNATURE ElsIe- /ectf-/<< ~fj &r()()~ ~~ ()~1/.( k'EJ.c,~8J mcS+4tU ~ , r. __.'.rl..lt'Ar_...-_______.=_ , J-\ -JL:~t1 /Zo~?t e<-= J~~~ i A Y'i '" {"" 'MC)Y1c < Atiphr11l1L n:ll<~ 7d~-Il?qr<rz7 dt,Ib~ For In~r~ information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 -7Y""'''") Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com J, ----- '/W) \ 1\ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! "~I /... We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME _ADDRESS 41 {Ce f3r?V1 ik~ .:11ld/'Ul OcA-L.OUi ~ (Y) u'(' tCW\cJY\.ij(P J 5IANfr~.l f\- Al.(J~i<TrL- 1 J_Ll0 ~y~ ~ /fYYJJ\lWh ~I/^ ?2 ...../ r()OYi P.,4r, i7n'~ r? jDaN10ltk(CA~ 1 vLf$rr &/'v.zS",,J J. jYl&'\.J\ Que tVCL 0 t~;!;:;~ ~ rt r1 ~ J-lA1I _ .~ For more information and petitions contact: Citize~s for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com E-MAil SIGNATURE ~ fl. ~~ )\q-s-v n&a (~ ~~;/~~ U15D d,~ t;..u4} ~ r 50 h i't-... ~ ~ ..-----.. fll 2 ~ T07ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. / \I( '. _A~DRESS , _ E-MAIL C/r,-_ ~ -/7g7?{)/d:, ~ /' \/ 1ftJ,(}ItJ)l'tf~?p I jINI( Q.t-;;;:.r: Alma.. CdYl!/",J .'t6t 1'" /L I) p.- rn f/--e rtjll/:. 51 Iv \6. \/ rJ.Nja..L Allc..,'a.. R.I((JJ.;.'J MOI'J\ca L. (1;0 ..~ ",-\-.0 ">>-; ci7~-/fr/./tf/.'Z4-'i:: )(T SJ~I/a {ktJ7C?5- 27 ;; 'Jill!? OJ? . C.O.c. G. .Jf'~ ~ \1' " IC1"-..n~.J cc-... ) For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 12 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor1 1.,':<... l~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantlY reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. I \ , NAME ADDRESS ~fuirA ~11~d5- leA ifft' r ("\ ~ I fl"V\'''~'' {qfV'~- I_I rJA ~N51,J(7 - LcrlA-GII',o++ E-MAIL o~~ ~*'- (:,..ql (",""':>4(", c.,fY CA / t1 q}1 /I , I (",' if cr I Of .)0- ~y-,,,,,-IJ"^ l >dH~~ 1f= <?O I IV C '~p t!'~ "1;'950 0~~ 0'}P {(J .Q ~, _ ~ ~ oJ..... '-.J"'" 71fft /~ , , I \ /J1V'L-tI--- - ., l1o/t!f. For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I Ii' ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. "z~ ..,.., REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL ---- -~~ W tl sip "7 ~~t,\5f\ (:::>,/-1 z.. ~li 7A5f:tlf l!;,wrut /J M ARt; me ItA 11tH--P I ~ \ .~ ~ '\er'€:\8 ::'-:::lc'<l\, \'\ < 0-t W:!::~N < p,.,.~\r\aA'? \ \1':\< Y1Au'1->/') ~ " j - /3 '~7C~fL i? ..,--\ hn A \', ( :0 J<,~( do For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ! I &ii[!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL ( '7 Ilr a " "/J Sr""eV\ O//\ri1lr- f,~\tR" h\()(~ ""'\.~9--\\~ (:rKl.~n ~-lJb~ ~nf~V\ ~i.\~' " .~{V'\~~J} ~v Pedl/{!) V(>..L / " " ~ 77 , 11 /f{~). Y y},~ (")" e s (\...'1 q I~) / J\\~h,~ Y'{\(,^.i~N 7 " I;. UJ II 11/" f' ) PtJ:f' V jL.TVr- tl/ lltJ. /. .~II (if. For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ".N! .' ~/ ?, ~ "N., I \ ~ - Jd ,,~_.~~ ..,1 'Ii / 1-r.rlf~f " "4tt:d;P' I i ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. MAME ADDRESS E-MAil SIGMATURE '&(/F(A/() O'l--/'I<_f.--IJ U U4 OAfJIL(A() ~d~~. ~~ . -~~ I < 'J1? "i',; ..' /-l- . Rc 't"'i,-, JJ ;; ~ L~ '\\0- +\J e't ~ . )J{,tJ,v Ii -J.i,' d L ~ ~"?17~ ~,74,7? ~ e~_ ~ 17 ~ ~~)~~ crL ~. !e1AA1~ ~;} _L~ Z \ "".., fA Za'Y;,.ty For more infOrmatiOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! .~ We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E.MAIL 1'-1 41.--'-"- .t~ dl"x-~ > ) ~ /) ~Y7""o'~~~ 7 .C '~7' 77 :; ".- /' --' (l1G 9.S v Cf\ E:. ~- /~\; f;.9 L/ln~/~.!\ C.f'j... J.,' ll;:r~-'/ l{l~<- r 11- l) i S L (I J) \/4-(.)./ ]J)50- y}\ r (Q\JQ'1 r:. ~r more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com I ! ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~f14 '977 ~ ' ~7J- - . ,/, ~q~~ S':D-l:?~<-J J-r-y \ =hf~!/~(), Vt~l, ~c-/ I) \J 0fh#-J- ,fn, 7 I, a f.Rt1.l1; " ') {(\ (I \ ~ ~ \l. \L l r\~ more infOrmation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 - 1 r r; 7" I ..};. \ Wy\ .' . Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ADDRESS E-MAIL >6 Sy ~ 11'1 ~ 1; C; 77- '21/ ,9/t/lf' I ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! ( We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME~ ADDRESS DJtd-t Levi \ ~6}~:;Z: 1IJzo /: /!k---! . PM tf- ~H ~ E-MAIL . ~. . CO flY- a~, hb , / /( II j) EN 11 tf /-/6<1,/1 11/9 n ~ y. {~~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ,0 ifqr;::;,/Cf 1/1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGN~TURE . 'il'j'u" C ' it , ,cA, ~? ~~(act((i!.~c.e,JM , ' t/,. ~ -t)<V'p c y~,-.: ' o . D(" '1 (:-1'1',) '-f1.j~ ex,.. d.t..-,-c;, ~~ '~:~~:/ ~.~f-S~ , '\ r' I ' , /"..- :';:' '. . j '<1 :.ij. . \l~ ~i ,-oJ}!;:,"'., rP;;::':~" ~,~4f: ~~~ _ ,},.l,vlVt(..~ /1A.;!J-,tf...~c;,.~~-";:7 \ I "'~O)...oY' T.h,{ }lA/I/o;,,' c.-<.':wi.'lv-I---- t'SME:fJAU)A L^CiL6~ J~\'-!I'-\{'\.' \' (1\.\{'t\('.Ai- \ c: ~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 ' !lonita, CA 91902, (619) ~,12-744 7, or e-milil INww.dtizensfor125,com I'. ~ itljJc{ pS, ~~~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME 7/1-11)1)1'<1 l';t-eNIl<</;>G.Ki~ ADDRESS E-MAIL J ,. . ftk_'Lrlf-r~ ';/ "., " -"" ,f "'. ..__../ /./ -Z.... <', '.',r .... '/ .,/ . /__'" .. l......;'" . ;\01(,1 /:sf~ PI/ ~Y~;~?K~~( ~~-1,~ , 't {'1 (( it < tL-1 <2- r.uv "U-- J. " .:<,1 C;" <' /"'./~,.,.. J". I/( ( {' 7 7' W/.4' vv/ [, j :f' . r' o . .':'----'--7 {;.' "l -//\ IJet/c:' .); I Y /~(~ ,'%ti," . For mor", IIIlUrrmnlOn ano petitions comact: I.ltIzens for 125 7??j',U Bonita, C:A 91902, (619) 412-1447, or e-mail www.c:itizensfor125.com 111 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS /1 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ,., /1 E-MAIL SIGNATURE 171 7'/?/y IN ;~ICjI ~\"\\ ',--,' NAME /wk'G ~if 1 eGwt'6>>-. \ &frLY/ICcr Haw&; \l J A~oN f Af'RaJ ~ ft1 tl/ 1 Sft?f15nl :S()('() IZ-I? nGUe;de oeD- 00\\-- ~'C\~ cltJ;P€ lJle::> \ <> <:. \ '5 E.- \'J1-c.1- b~ (?;~ J:::~J~~I t ~c, &l(l~ ): JJI'A -dd &fl-~- f\(rf~'#\~ .bCl/-I"-=b \ A~~I\NWu ~~"~:5 ;-1 ff I N- . \ ~ '/ For more II IIVIIIIdUVII clllU petitions contact: 1.Itlzens for 125/ Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ADDRESS I '.if, &41 (<i( 3 ~ ---...- 'f','1fVir.'i'IY ~ :s-A-? 't.jf9~ D ~ q \'"0 1 ( fr ( , ('1(/ ,#'1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS I! REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! .--' / We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME L') I k'f.,~ (~IJ;'T_ ADDRESS /~-:;- 1 M '" "IT""'!.... (YEwMAll SIGNATURE (-/1' ~ (")o"d If Aakh ()'i '-' '/ l-,evl ~i?<.. VvvU _ . 10; ?- > vrO"1) k-I{:f; ~O-o\~~l:::LQD' VI icM"",....J f ).fh,rror- ~ , t:~~~~iJ~~( ~ Le:t1b1,:e cfA~ I ~ Jkwlfl j L~ rrlclf~ 1J~' lJ.- ~\Q"" ~e7- / 'b ~J-<-sl'-l (~"\"I'/(' ;;L LL -:e~e I' G.',\" q IC[,B ~ IU.. r~t.\- "";. ~/Auj~ /../ _.If ,-L ", " ~-I ""',,' ' / 'U..fL ~ ~ b ~ f< C" -+ / t. ~- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com -)3 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUCEUONGESiIONOcG STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streetsl 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtownl Otay Mesal and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%1 to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E.MAIL n I t~;r.~ lJ~~ G-t' [Y2f-&~' gel( _ 1. trv E /1,q RT H!J. .5 . t:!/ / C->Id~ 'SO (/0 <C.. '3 u;t"~ ~rQ1 (l'S'l'><JI'<>'Ll~WV>--" -::s1 l . ,_ r<l ) v -.::::: For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com / '3 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUUEUONGESTioN~" ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E.MAIL SIGNATURE '" - - -L T/l .:A j. (~''<A c' 1!~I"kp- ff!C~. /Wc:{'C~l /:~/'I' 7R/CA ,Ii) 1/-( '7 { For more :>r 125 Bonita, CA 91 "'U\!, (01 '/) 4 ''1.-/447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS)X<,t REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. /3' r-- REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS '~l> W"vO _ ~IK ICJo'V<<3 2 /Jj/1J1 k/U Cr ~ ~ K': ;if) JfL,p,,)- O-\~\S ~/L{,i4- i ~E' r.f'CL~IOvJ ll. . ~ ~i2-z:S/L. \ A R-~f7fJ -'~~ '\NI -1 .Ie: <:, \II 5 I -\- f\ 5;/\lA i{ '~~; l1it~:=- ~)w.\1r) ~u..jl~\)Il~\l J , 0\':;1/\ I !,7l..r) , Pc. ?'- 't-' ^('\'. J q /11 v /I L.-. t"\"~ ir"~ 0 (0 . J or more ....""III".II........,-IIIl.III.... ....~...n..""II., """",11",'-\. "III,IL"II:' lor 125 Boni ,CA 91902, (619) 412-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com E-MAIL " SIGN /), /9/r;?IO .---, ~ , ;> _ /;~-6 ~rn ---<Wtfk~V~m/N~/fr{Y- _ ~........-/t /' TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS /~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS KATHY ~fJepOllitz- v'~~-- 5~~,,,~CL'~-~ t-4~~ K.cD 0 E. l'Iloe-t1 \fc,~\ Cft UREL ~.-P- Om,b E-MAIL , -- ~A CfI'lK ~ '" ~\\ ~f) IS' . V, s.:Pb ~ ~ . ~~~'u" ~. ..~.v~~ ,4 :'ft3 d, ,~l for more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 4J2-74<l.7, or e-mail www.citizensfOi'125.eom ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS /3 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. .. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL r /I 6--.,A:h4-ff' . SIGNATU~E Q'11{) :-l/F /.- M 'It erR (j 7- -ILl, L It Vi Sf A CI'1, l' C7 ) ~A 0.. or- 7/r;. P L ~/~r~ !). L :P",.7z l' AY len ~( ~~ 'R:lflB'VrV AfJ/) .,.-1Jt;: i:l!A)){c\ ~1/7 ria-de,") c -L 7/91Y 5/'1/3 A!tt ~IS v't / 0 ;i"J: ~ iJI5H '(!V ~ 1J o ':!:~]) A M I ~c((>,1 J i~ - J--kNzt-iK :J t~ (LfLY r\va~ lL / A Nt: e Sl~vJtJ I For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com / ~.~ . TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. C ~ REDUUE UONGESTIONO, , STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Ctay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Ctay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~CL--~ 0- ?rJ"Ch\X_ (~;;t~ ( --/Vf{ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com J J' ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFF~CIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ (ltJ (jC),) \~ REDUCE CONGESTION~J~ /' STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL S~~\lt\"'- NVA- QVIl- U2f'-\V1 l?-ev1C\ Jd /AM1 IJ ~ /~~qYA ~Vtlt(.A kdck De. AYlctc" ;0fJ(d;h~~~ 4' />' ._ '(.t~_ . "Jz;:.~ I ~' (/"',;/", ---- '" .. "__ "-" tLc,,__ ...._.~.. __ '7' -'----:;:;' I --'I,,; M f'~(\ ~(2D /~~-<>5?1 if ~ : (;c~y~f" . ~ '( c L L' \ -~._ \ '- \' I \) 1\- '\[) I -, i:::\ (C , , \Jf';.Nut' 't>u PeAl For Inore information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com mDmI TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS '7 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. .,fl-t{ g,gJ f> REDUUE UONGESTION zS-- STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E.MAIL ,B1~ A)/ffiJ " - /~ v - '-- (v h (I ":,, \id"E' t 'I J "'Y\f",,,A,Gv \IQ~ $tM~ C~.u ... Y'j I P'O'-' ~ ,- c-~,J.,.. Z For more infOrmatiOn and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com r12 ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ; SIGNATURE '-x~- '1.' IJ Q I .&AI~pA c.:/Wb... . ,- d~o('/U' ... ,/ V c.:., ",,) /A.-->.-' A[ , q L:n4 Cl4,<1\X); ~ ~ H/f 71 vt::;/~~~J~ ",- L~ . (11 (\ J.1.e.ht2\~ . s a':n )\~7ntp<1 ELiO~e /3/.!.,,/u;? av- . - - I'ltrl,;rJ fl.. 151" 4~"~ / For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~[7 ~3 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E.MAIL -, IS \ 3 "a.... ~dr'~;~~ qmo For martw 1",Vlllla"....,11 OilY "'~"I"IVII;) \"'VII",n..\.~ \"ILILlC:II:) for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~~ ~ Im:ii[!I3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~Nl'-'L I ~ ~r~dv T' YV;\~[/ - 'y-a-(-/ r ,/ ,../ ,~ ~ \.. / , - / e , V' 0) , ! i I \/ For mor"" 1IlIVIIlIUlIUII dllU (.J\CLlUUII~ t,;orUdCl; \..ltlzens for 125.f Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com. '0 \ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFIC1~is REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, . APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL ~ 1~ . I /% '{Yi .chi:-II "- 0A: /'.)(11\(-+ o /' , . ~j~:~ . -r~, k\~-{\(>j-f_~;). v! ), 'j' .d . 11>:11 4lt" .;-,- !2. _ ,~ , , . (..'1 , ~dv.ii0 \ . yc-,<:,,(-', "t'-,,) ) '.) ,.I 10100v ~ ~. Cll~Z- ~~16~'r1j! J. \( c..A Qh03--- .4<<:-;..( ';) .,c~--\ - . I ),M. " ....- I.>: I ' .\ . - /I. ( .1....1....1--:::; f-Zl,r/-Jjt./ \ \:; ( -' l. ~~.A./ O~'i L>j--' -j" ( .,_,'it "fi VI ,01'"' , "1Zl :$i f Jf:)' ) "---y:,)... (~T(-~ ';- /"''-iJ 1:> 1 ~:t~2'f--" :::~. , v -.-" '," ,," ./ ,( '. .'7"/<'''';- I ,. - . , '711.' ~ i/....o',,- ......,.1 f-,....-" i'l .... . I. For more infonnatlon ana petitions contact: 1.ItIzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447. or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com (' r? ) u- r: ImiiI!I3 TO ALL ELECTED 'fEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS 1) bf/ I b' 4 ,j),lle/)/JI/4/ .. ~L , ......--- E~rE'R.. JV\. I }-\V.e..,4t\l ~ J-lAtt.",J I..OJ '" A./ZP / E-MAIL SIGNATURE t/;~~ ~~, 9'1" , . t,tvto I 'f 4-.4:f 1211'\ l'\ lL i2<?LF A, (9~""_ < (9':) 1'1/f.(Jvt 2.rn- 0 e.. q \ ,~q~~ ~~ LLI'-/(_~~ 'lllf4 VIJ.LL7 c~ '<:flr?;' ,,({Ol!~ ci\- c1\'1 '-\-'\ I ~A r ""-10 ~ I $" )€M /9/0 ~ ~ - ~ \"--v.~'& t::. O...lI~""5 ~l.ANOD ~, C!tr(J,~'t;_ kcl \ '1 '5. \-hj3 \{)S_ ]6"" ~J/ 1;1 '~.Q V'<.fat ~ - - ... For more IIIrormatlOn ana petitions contact: C;ltlzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 4'12..7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor.125.com I'} ) 2 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. , We the undersigned respectfully req~est that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL "" /J/ / I? "", ~"'14 . 4f-trfi:.'- l;'?~_"..//~ S - '~ " f 4. _S- U }. " tl-.{:,!e~~ . ----'<'1. "U.e4:i For morR mrormatlon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I J l ~/lfJ /x!dr i; mrAlya Pasl\kAS J /Vlldw.--e-I A .~f+v~:. i-otl//7 L .1?/N/IOL;-J _ s..-,g fi-; ; tt- ._.;:". TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! I We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS Uj"nc\C( M~Y1d\()\~ iYI E-MAIL SIGNATURE i~~ ~~?1' "j~. , . I? / I '6h()i .-/(}.J ., ~/ J~be I e0NrrnJ". ~~0t: ~;:~I JdIe...y'IOS. ",^ov{I~L Mll.\YJV\A.J. ~ I ~ Mo.~ <%\o0\Je~ .1 n . ;L(ql' Ii..{ ( t(Ol(, '/ ~ :?/~Q)i' :"Jtl4rt...J ~'1~11 q;;;;:;;: jen) &0..:r-fi()-0"1f:1~~ ~ ~ )"a:, . ~o: ~l~ ~y,~. ), V Co \ '~ r'c. /-&v;C),Ji!~. '-- .' I 17- . 1 ,'J r J}J () /0" /(YI (d)J ftc,,,, C'/ f e,; \ / - . For more Inrormatlon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com '</ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! '2,_ We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~{!vmm/' (tf,n~1 " JI it! tt~~~~-' J1;JttNA/ J' 7i-~t.,y_ E-MAIL . VruoV\\t<x0l\9UQ:,~...)lQ; ,,/ 11f;.~ /~~'f/J. . 4 'v :j{) lMA. M fI $" F \ 'VLlJ1\~W, \'\\.\\'1tCv t"',1 /S'If+//11ft ' FfJ-ff'lCf.{;, C "" . -:c .J h if':::.'c r fft,...,- c"-;,e: j~ ~ 4- rl rf I \ t...Fft ?trJC.YiE/ l~ ~ f-i 0 P",,"s 1 7fr I(, r-- , ~,,\~~~~ (q?~ ~"A ~\"-'- \i..\\\~\\\A"; For more inrormatlon ana petitions contact: Ctizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I </ ) ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS "', REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL j,v. <r '<1.77 ~:r I ' 'DC[ SIGNATURE 7 A~ g~k:~~ A\~a(~ (~~ "/ \'\ 1) l\.l<. Dc...lt i\- E/.:r-~ S; 7.m ~/Zj}A/ ~!eM .Ii t~(()y.e', Ct:R.ViJ ;' i /:I4'gea. ;.f~.:rt J '::j'{\k1U' (!\. J",,- _ L, &c?A)()41 /;kS7Lj( l:r:l; 1'\ lA j\J E<?1 41 - , ~\ -. fi;:.,.df~/YI/9' /J?t:~ ~"" Ok6- 7 .~u 1tri:~ ~ ~- For more information ana petitions contact: \.ltIzens for 125 j Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com , ,.,~. ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL J ~( ~, I I, ',J . '1- " f Ii L L tAt , t ,\.' f "-.- ",,-,) (~ ' , (0;' (' - ,( . '~-"'!/.~ / , Ii 7) I'V- ' OIA (r (', ,''t(: -{~ /7.~7 f ~ c.1G-- p,. GrJ'lfIIS' '(c;r more Inrormatlon ana petitic;ns contact: Citizens for'125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com NAME JI'147i IJf 4 }/7t1;, -::rtrfo H #5-rJ AI ~c:n-I.eJ Gill 0(\0 Ma Li~ (' ol/en 1::- IY\Ja ~ , I " -.-- TO ALL ElECTED ~LI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAL( REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. II REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! , \~ We the undersigned believe that:' . The construCtion of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS Jf3(J.-\J\J Ni \\~-tnfilk\~ ~~:s fJ Ilt0 ~(o U d~i J'~d:),f)JM0 . ~~~h,< [joy I V\. /' ~"'-/.,~-z.- E-MAIL /(1) For more rnrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com J ^- <(/5 -:J1 Cf /~ l) ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS $v/\} t liJ fl/h tt-/n ,. ! - J_i/i/0'~ t. lq J" I I! / /,', , .1. ) ~ &~) ~/ , . j, flLJ/>PF; /QA.i2-.1J.b Ie < CD:: h y'; \./ c:.j , f .f I' i, I qjift(~;~ .... For more Inrormatlon ana pe~ltIons comact: \.ltIzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.<:om #1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS /3 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE 8R-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL SIGNATURE AME ADDRESS ~;~~t4C: f!J.1t1?'(~^J ::J. ~-r:- ^}D~4- ~bLrtJ~ --;::-, ~a. J. \ ~ - Fo mor ...._...._.._.. .......... t'~..n.I'"'II~ \,.VIII.Cn..l; \.I1;1Zens ior 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 111 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! 13 We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE '( '-7<~~l~ I ":P. I ,....1I)at~ [r~~~~ ~6-M(X l1J,lo~ -5p\ \'1 'A ~ W'_-L dfJf;tL;J2_qj;J11/lfL ~ For mor~ 1111V11'la1.lVII allY IJt;UUUII~ \,;.Ullld("t; \,,11;Izens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, ((,19) 412-7447, or ~-mail www.dti1.ensfor125.com 1(1 j' IDiiiI!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. \~ffi ),\v~.l(l 't-i,~ DQ..th t..lY-.-\",,:; !J)(afJO, JOnCNl ~ LclLA ~l\. V1A.~ \ r) \ ' . ,~VO\\V\O\ N(}\~OI'f -" CrNe1fClo f41r13v<:z I .J, Ji" ~ ~k ~ I,~'l' ct:/!i'/t i'a .d / Vi. k ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE NAME ~\e_y.W1dl?oi ~ '~lc4^~", Vv('\~i ctJV1<;' l J. ,UMlh4\. tJ~lA,{c-- if j~lCA- '\)( \ - IIV' ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REDUmrCONGESTION' 0, C. L, STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. jAM~ ADDRESS . 1!>[;jJJIrHrr-J Dlift./, / ...~~It\ (71Il/ 7 ~\ <.. - - :;czr---- -<J .J-.---- '5-- --'- 't~ r//~ J lo--I.-\( --... For more mTonnatlOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ImiiI.!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS . REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. t-/q A J f~' ~ !~ REDUCE CONGESTION 43s STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL /. ) / \/;mJ5f;;) Va.v'1;~'--.;7 c;!"..I.lTI L1 Y1(J~ Ch(f~ j\~llM R~ iA Let:flI ShaN\a'w1P (:?iIW\"lfYfIl ~ l<tilSCI -SreL -Iv" -~ 'Ma:,I'...... ~.J..I~ _H1AOS'c l-l ~"j ,M'l h\ ~ ,(ltffi{' ~lq \\l"[L\() (11\')^C. \("\',()11("~~ '\!:J.' ,\AlI "~, '. ,IVI\ (, IN, ~ avo ' ' c i I --JItL I 6.(-)-11>'" \' I , .1, "... ,~ \......, _./ i"f! i /,,~/ For mer, ." _...__.. _...~~". for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ''', ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS . REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ;/C(t1~-6p' J J- REDUCE CONGESTION -ti) STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! "-', We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. -~ ADDRESS E-MAIL ~7~~ , .' ._~ 91(1, I' I I 411e fl~ 1J Z'..<1G, ,), # r ' ' ~..P.L\o. ~~ ~ \1 }"cbUl'R-.\t.. , c . .t:~b1 st~):~ t,' <- Kef I (iJ t ; Cl hi - ~\zc,\;,et-~. C \("t/{_ ~\-t __ :) ItJ 1 ( .~~ .:re~i'\e:t\-~~f\St? { Dr A,vrJ '" [L-IA ~ ,tJ(m, ~ I -21. -:-' For more infOrmation and petition-s-~:~Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAL~IA / l~ REDUCEEPUONGESTION' r/4i? STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL ~G2Q::.:: Ju<JJt J\\ ~\\I\.v\).(lr..\ __lL () For more mrormation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail .....^.w_citi~el.1sfor125.com ~ .,-:,;.'; "" 1- f31Jl q I fJ ~ ~/ loVIl'7llnif' 0ClvniA ~~lA- /..ll'/-A' '1/J14ti/() Se(} Ll/~4 J7[bn((1 h !J, _'')IIJ'"'~' '~~ ~ "~:-ZT I-TI:"t"fl~ ~AfJC)"f zS ~\:t~~~~~;~~ ~ lJJ.. Ylf "X-Mc1'(t- -_,~~~Jv p-t~- v v:.. , -I j ~/jl-:?- ~ 1l- <" ) ~t1 c;nll mIiiI!l9 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFI~IALS~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. tt~{O( \\~ REDUUE UONGESTION ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. Y/j~ ~ ~ADDRESS ~~~~;';;~~.,; !:w'l o~,a~;tJ,; ~~ V(JfJt!-S _ .4' ~~/,/C_ 5~~/~ _ J]f/i \ ~ t':{ /i'o~f /'J~ I", r/ {:{ t1,n-{J.f~ E.MAIL j,j , qt'/'I,} ~, 6/ '1'1ql7=-~~ *~ I. ___. L---' ~{;-~l~(--~((!Y/!iJ..t; (', \Ir{-\ '\ leI [\ .<1 l,'-f)"] Z '- .' For mo~.iRf6rmation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 -Bonifil;"CA,-91902, (619) 472-7447, or It-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~lT~ H3 .. ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streetsl 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtownl Otay Mesal and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%1 to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ft;;_ /t~;(fa 'CA 1:2(1'-/ ~~~/1 -V ~l 7 <!2.- 6tJmP6R.'- , ~ ~ \. . ..,eCA (1) rBz:t ~~ ~~:c ~~f't j6J.nCUl ~<fY""hrt t For more infOrmation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ ~ LIV ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS J II"" . E.MAIL f) _ _,"-, _..1 . SIGNATURE 'b:~J~ '?/; t/lLJ' .v/:n/~ / ~CC:lIrl1~AU :;~d7~ ~~ ).A 'IS. ~ r< '/Y:../ j'1f-.{z I ~ 'v (~j-) 'f /? f/j~ ~ . -- ~ ' ~r',~ \Jo. \ ~ r~q')9'1 ~ . for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (6'19) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ....~ $1Diii[!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ;< I REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E- ~ ) ) --=----~--- ' ..JOs ~ r--~ _ . o,.(V~tl/19/ 7' so !.L\ rv\~Ol) \.\-.)c-Ilp ~ 0 \,:~O.:..-: I'~ Vf(011 at! ! I // c\ t' I f ~~~dJ2€ ;(b~ ~ I LA PIA 2.A Zu8f1 ~'l"'\('''~ c.r~L->F'14\' For more Intormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.c:om \~ ti7 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. '1tl2 , ~ /MAME ~ 'Ett ADDRESS E-~ _---:c>- ) f-" 2- ~"'\ .- 'i)-- .;; 'lfLL Ie-A7 ~ ,/ / For mOltG liUUlmauvndllU (JlG"IUVII:;t \..Ulll<<:H..!,,; .....iI..Lllc';.llS for '125 - '-. Bonita, CA 9-1902, (6'19) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com / \')-f ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL /) F'J-- Of: fJ 1{ J if, SbL ~ ''-- . . ~ ~3jJJ~,?~ '/7/6 ~ ql/f Y ,/ . f~ /'cJ-- ~ 0\t~' J..1?f ~ ,J,,'lw,k~t'jv.".t<<. ~yft- 1~{"'1}~11 ..-,fJdi (Ucjfc~ 7 Wc.^~A/Z ~~~, " L ( :eu wUAA 011'0<::>- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ! ~j , ;-'. -7 m:iii:[!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT BELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL ~ U ( If1;\.( .e"'t ~ 1M~ "bM(;~f_ - -- f'. ,,, , ~ f~I4""JS!!iII,fI';' - -' , -I 1 , l l c: -[.' j(O '\- / ~~~t / lr71 11'177 S!!-1--r7~~- . . ~'\ '''j (if 1 Z 77c/r~1''-C, )6"" For morE.. ....__...._........... ......... ..,,,,,,n,[Qtr.)"\;;utttdc"[;-\..ltIzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E.MAIL 1- mn\~,e... Ol c. .~ o " If:; cd",;-; Afltl M#flCl GOh1aln \0 % ht ;7:/c.k A 1-.l'D1',I2soN 1 \~tt-,jVl ~l c, 17/2./0 eo ZAZ J.J.: 1. e~ 12-0(, f'.- -IT (J v: A<:-u~JA _ I SIC> '" . ( r: 0'$ I!.~ Jcz I h<.k -1Yl1J)(' 0" e ~ o&ct ~\J~ ~~=--- Tv ~~~ ~ ~ {in ",,'/l1t,,/Q (. '1:%1 DZ/-yJ J7 r: r:-z, /;1 1/0 FE/... 'I /fa 5/( f.J For mor~ i1I1VIIIIC!IILIVII elllU JJt:"L1L1UII~ LOUI..cIC;l:; \.mzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com Sl> ,. ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! <:. We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~O~() I fn Lhu',J{; '7 _PtJS9!luy./ P {;><'FO?r' ,~I\ \{ eS~WI\"MV ,~ '(Y\ I C-\;\d,l~ eV\c. \to. E-MAIL vv ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by governmef;lt red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS LtJ( P170 ~ I (pq(h Lo ~/' Uri'l4f_ E-MAIL - , .. I ,_ I ~"'" i. l!1~r~-- 0 . c ~- u b~ ~ aJ(JY\/ql ,e. AllltYodt M ~ r "IlIA :I)-, tlh\.€ Bt 0 ~'^"- J- . 'J ? ?/Cl r I q 10 -,-------------- "~ q (hl!/~~ ,C rNsv - / For marL ...._...._..._.. ...._ ...."'............~ ""\,,111\,1;1I""... "'1\.1"""'113 for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com \'11 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL,~TrT~ A~D L~L OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE - mi7?J:: 111 N't* ri . Il-Nt..r'. ~ ';, ~ ? ) . '-::::iL ~ ) 8/J.~(T~~n;t//y Ij~,Lr t~~~9 // ill,,) ~j{Vt :l 73U47U ~~ /JA '211'1 J "0 1tl1 ' ~ (U I{ 'v 19-'- ~ ~,;" - &,.d "4~#;--= ~/ ./yy-, {iLl G'... (~ > i.1 >\ \ )\ Ii. /"\ -- T:. _ For more mTOrmatlo"~an(J p~lIlIUII~ "-Villa,",". \,.,lllLII(OIlS for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (6"19) 472-7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com \y 7:!S~ 1;t:rL/ / Cj ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOtAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME l)ef\\se ~ \ (\(\ Ve"V1ri1ter Jarsl-{ 1"1 C ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE << ') , <~- ~; CWjf)J \: di" /, )/1/0 i=:S~. ,<,> . .' ,::.~< c-~ J rAV\{WiJ~ .~):~~..v~ < ""-t, p1 :iIJ(~, A~../t.. I . .' ~(i-'1tC"\ V...i'S, K-f/ , . . ,-;) . ,/~'" ii' " j /. /. ~ l~~~~U\;::~-'~l"~ ~ ~,";'(\' .I:p!l(ii~{:r' ~ j\j.. ,_I' \-,", -:- (- ~IYu I~J\j) ___-j~~iv- rZ~ :bICil dl{..(%/ lll>citg L.<:L ~~:):-.t~'{L: \'\ \ t. L <11'1.0 ,t u.Jk-~",-, It, 1\ 1'\ {;. v~" V 0 ,1 u: 1/ 1\., \c, <- '\Au< For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (6'19) 472-7447, or e-mail wW..\f.dtizensfor125.com LYt\)OPr '2-D II ~"-' i~<Qf?-l<~y\.(')(ds I, D~ l!fj G{n \. r flf' 'I : f > -e ~'~~ >-,.. ~. 'f #7 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! /1. We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS -Ddl\) \ J \fr\;"~ M ~ ~ 0.\ 'ilC' c;..... tj a ~'a c" E-MAIL .\4 \j,> '- / )(57/3 I . 4~~ .c-lJ ~J;{~jL f'lltr+ ioY/c.1 CI~ C'l c,/9.fi ~~ ("0 ~~_:)J _ ~ For more infOrmatiOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com L 0~'7 I q 7/ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS vi REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~U ~t , I REDUUE UONGESTION ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME JinC/ lee C'hu f<cu-- (Cj p-od~CI ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE rCfJ /./J <? r ~-.Jle,-._ "l('")-ClA..,,:;:.__ v fA - 11 ~/fc{~ ~~t';;; , 6 ~,c/ jTi'f;~-~,lL- ~ fjt:l- \L" - '--/ '\~ -~ ()(-~e:{ ( C0t~. \J DJ\ ~\l\~~ k'~ f ' 'j 1,1" ,A, \({\ U;:) '" ,~'Yi, For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 \ Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1441, or e-mail w.NW.dtizensfor125.com 6 '-I ?--- ) 1F1 ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS 1:;2- REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~ "- NAME ADDRESS -7/I3ii ~~!a?-- )au/~ J;nr:N/ C~~j1,//,PS' E-MAIL j, i .---..-- -!! \ -.4&(J[Lki, _-15 /JJh0 I J -:r~< 2;"( 7/"/lu UUh2Vi1. ~r(/' 111 ~~Gt~~.~ ~. J:;J ,'j!;,J- ('150 ~~ x~ '11lifIJ1~"3 9/Cj!, l '-, - .~ !Iff-AlA ~AN/f!.[Z_ Its/era, ','/qzlVtda- E) ") /') / ,. '., I,. 1 '/.. /. ' .1 1 .," ;,_, /J ~> V -- ~J .l) l" ,J..../!...X V :4 (At.l (j S IE '>1 \!.-___~ . 1,-1 / /), For more ...__.,," '...~ ,,~U"'J1" <.omact: I.ltIzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412.7!!41, or e..mail wv.'W,dtizensfor125.com [\ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION O,e, 0 STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL - -... ....-..\~-- / atJ.,h n > D~t1 {fit {(Ate- ~ ~ ~CX. ,c b./jv- !-/,D'~ B~q,\~; fA ~~Q 5f- I. '(.-:lIcJ:"'- "1- ej ,. ""'. ~,,~ 7~csfc>W1 _ ~. ,- ~/'--'~~ c:,~ //. :91}'V ~" . ~'cJ~ _.~~~ ___ '1...a.., . d-1",,-..)) ~ J Q""",-, )lr~~.~1 . ...--- - ~. - ....! For more InfOrmation and petitions contact: Citizens ior 1 <7.5- SOl'1itil, CA 9190\!, (619) 412-7441, or c-rnail www.dtizensfor125.com ~ t\ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ( NAME ADDRESS I~ SIGNATURE ~ /)J. ,/~ } i215"/ v'y~ !~~ q12J () M Ilr.; ~CD k ~~..O %;)137'~Af~ n_ + ~ 9':+1/'5 ~~~;"'L' , ':~lfl) !l.~",fi'; k.b:a.& '1'J() lr.) c~ ) ~ c L < cu ~'<- J,' jJ $,,:,- 'v ;' Z'1t7Itt1.4 ~~' -7'1/1'. Ie; 71. I\""'\.~V""L ( ~ \.J~\.eyY'L~ bc\~'i~,,-, lr r;CC\~DYtiL1fit - ~--'IJ or . For more informati. _.,~ lietltions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita. CA 91902. (M 9\ ...72-74.:1. ot e-rr;i'in \'Y'Ww.dtizen~,for125.<;pm II IDi&I TO ALL ELECTED ~RAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E.MAIL SIGNATURE ~ .. ) cl\- 't2 i~'\ ~ 7;;L/ 73 9' ' J, v / F rv .- ,// 1'"31!'l crJ-I:Fl )~ "2131 f/......'-;... '" ''1/(} I&1VJ'IK 7if/V jD/(j . 9~/0C; {.,. i/'ll . ~ qo W ti( ( S:;TIt"" Precil\<!o ~_ChjAj)r'-'f;{ C4 l' (rl 0 ~L ;z-::r- - '.ottaJ C7If q / q.5~ .. \D, ctlY$Q) (a~-tJt;,,~ for more Information and petitions cont.3ct: Citizens for 125 iloni'lil. CA 9'1902. (619) n2-7447, or "'-In,!! www.dti:i:Cllsfor125.com t ~ -c ... ~ 5~~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. -f{[jItI'/7uv II REDUCE CONGESTION ~.~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAil Ll /LJf if SIGNATURE . , ~ \{-\tto!I\ J"'" . '-L 1Yl~v~ 'D ,r=> ~i . .. ),/./" -' "/ J~ v;"'-" __.~'(.:; 0" c- .c:": 1)~wl Utt"~I~Jl{ ft1;t&~!f~;t;,- ''v LlourlleJ f'i 111 _ \ 1t {v' tWJt~ Ec!wc:u.. / \ , ,,-'""- - I" ,919{{ _ /l1,<)(2: l:'M ,.\I ' ?~ -~??-::-/~/'> .--~ '., ~.rb~ -- - -- For mo~e infOrmation and petitions contact, Citizens Ir 125 ~ Bonita. CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail w\wl,citizcnsfor125.<':ol11 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFI.CIAL~ . REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. H<f.fj(!l} Grct" II REDUUE UONGESTION it)~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL tJlQ\ i SS"t\ Alco\::tt ~IY'~W, -:::''''-'- 1~:~~1 r&~:7nvq: rbYlf)A.i! tJ LP'{r~ rI c: \ kVlJ1l-{a. t (TYlw1c2- . _+:ffih~ Yll ~ ollbtl1] ~ )MQdU1e iN H -E' 0'''' Iv1J'9~ j: , /^ /~~.",.A }-'. '.. '.'-'; . "",""'f,-,A- A """, v -' , , \g~~ C)('h ;J"rrN" ?l~ '1.77 ' '7 ' I rer- >1 (1 '1)/0 For more informatiolTcmd petitions contact: Citizens for 12 Il!onita, CA 9'1902, (619) 472-7441, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com n LI?.. ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS (J~i~lr,/i7tcS 7~)> c. a"p.,;'a? H CI"",!-o- (>^[",/I VcU74j ". .,' . WIL - ; --...,1 /'1>>; 5>/~/? ;:; ,'1lroZ J' i;;.-' /', .. et' ' ;~' ,t l'--~ , ',' - ", v ,. f" /J'1 :: ~ /,/. ~,~l-~?~77-- <1/4 tZ ( tw~t/-i ~'- L,--~ , -)", ,) ( ~ t[/~9!'Y ,l ... ) z,./ , <--1, /J-I,v.<! ",-"to ~(.r"'df~1','. J I' I.' , S-r ~ L";~/r.~j~, '6.. -~~ ./' ,-- :./,'" , '-/ ,<:-61 7' ';it', ;/,/>>7c","( ijlU:i:t 01 '-'{);;.y' ",;r').k,(~ "" f. -C--:: ,'_ ,:.,e-;'C.Utt__L:; t, u,'O (fJcl1v Lt; t h~D i12 /) c;- ()&,i' t i7--'-v , For more infOrmation and petitions contact: Citizens for '125 , Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 4-72-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor.!25.com. , ' I! / ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL ~ f'^tjVPIJ ZA. b. t'\JrJV1'~ ~ la<' C..fYl f'~ lJ~bra. M. 'DA5:Lul B Itf-, ~~..- \1 / '. / "\. I \ (.11 , j ~-c;O 971' q qZI/l{ ~u.l~~ " 'J //1 ' t4. '1,1/! '-I l1'/A,OAy'/k ":;:7) r!.L Hrr;'~t:Ij) t 77 '^~ ~{;;~. ~I ~~~f{fA;;~~~ J A NesSA H{?j2.pGlPt:l ).. V,.I1/ _ t-li); ~ l~ 0 ( II ;; 'f' / .3fs.~;.,,,,,,- Ll'fI'L....> :15' . For mort II IIVIIIIcn.IUII dllU pt:lltlOns contaC1;: \..ltIzens for 125 Ill"...it" 1'491902. (619) 472-7447. or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com I' Ifiim!D] TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAl, 'rf/iiA~D LO~~ OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE "'.~, ,e_, -, ,-.ct :~. .~ -\'i -\ :, .,.-"",_"'C,.. ~' I> . II' -! (Vit\~U .IHI .///~ /I~J.[", cr21 q ," :(9 . .) II "!IV qJ1- ,-'7./.:;.....// ~L ~ ~. .----/'... -'-:/~ "1;/./11/ J :t -..("..----- I ,,"'r. ." ...,- "/.., ,/ W r .A(('l . ,>.( . ""I ,,--. 'A '{(if! ' vlll/at.., ( t{/t1/1 f"! < *.~ ~)Il'. .1tttir) , ~e (tU~iCSu,~~ <:7.).,.4 h'Q-J,,;y--' / I '-...- "'Vlli{d lv ! 'C-I- /------ O~ I . \ ~~ ~~~_ I.... ...... \), " (' '\1 _ ,,' i i f '\k, " .~ \j'.\j"(V~ cJi)(\~ l\ '<, ,-,CCl,,,j,; . . - F6r mol'''' mrormatlon anl1 petitions contact: Citizens for 125 !lonita,. CA 91902, (619) 412..7441, or e-mail www.dti1.ensfor125.com -:'1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS If REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~/ NAME ADDRESS 'DtIXIVIk oaPceq-v-v tit f{f)j4 JJ;r; /J ;Zf2/) CJf2:IN ~ .. tbb~8~i ,~ V\\9 f;{, 0)l'~ 1/J;11 ,{< ~ :::'lC:f;k/ tJ\Y\\uu:z.- tS.~E~I-->-O:\ s:. ' E-MAIL SIGNATURE ---- _,r-""'~. ~("r~ =(/, ~-~ " ,r.... ") ~. 7 (11!!ll'! C DID~) .~ ;, { (ii': /l; .~) '\ :) /L;' " " '< ... :.') , ' \_ ,-: r, \ "--''4.,',/ ',,', .,U, '0' "f . . ~--"""<..."J; "- '.... L.\.f eL(:l _-f1uJl' Gl ,) ~~l2~___~_ 1)1\ i1,1,) I ~..._-- For more IIlTOrmatlOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 0-.....:.... t";. (H :U:ih'j i.i~-d 0\ Ii =ijO_ ~iii1i')' r\V t,>~m;llil "^"^'Writj,vnll.;fnt'19~.('om 'j " ~ TO ALL E~ECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS L:f ~ REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~ iF1 REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. liU."of e\ ~\ q'l';'I', ~- /// . I /~'&/(r>"L,' ~/ fYf ~-, . v ~--- f\l\n11'" I< LVI 7!!J ~ 1'&" ~ /d / SIGNATURE \\ , ~1'S, ~Iir "' /( / . --~ /. ~.. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL /'--'-',-.--,/'''''''''''' l . ..<7. ----<--.."'~::;:;~~~~ c;:::5/ /7 '-< ,--;h'7 ~ /6,~\ CJi?I'~: Ir?-- 711~ ~~ /f/5 . 2:it:tt~-:-r-..o<~ ;}.l LI . "..' Lv: 0 \-\ ~ \ ~.) Cit \'vC\ -:() r "I" C /l ,.~.J{q.__. r I ~ J..1~IZIJ1.. CCWC"f!i: J;;:A ~~ T~~.i2 ~. \. 7') . . ~c::tr\ Y)~r\,r' -- ~~. !?tJ5'e Jr!Oc./(errzit For mOno infOrmatiOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 ~nit,. IA <;liQIl" ({,1Q) 479..7447, or ",-mail www.dtizensfor125.com \ D IDID[!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. . REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS,- APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego RegiaAal ~ . Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. t We the undersigned respectfully fequest that you u e the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and ~u.i t without further de y. /i:~~ ~ ~-, 0. ~a '\<f'DeccA tj\t\\~ / ::1 ,lO / " " '\ Z;~IL _ .LL \.. )r { I'l ~1/911?/tTI<ICf7/!.!f4t4ijf{~ ~(LA~ >:1:" q,'f. \' ~ ~~~:i:'"Ji. ~ <1'-.) C\ 1 {Q0V1?4A For more infOrmation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 It'}__:."" li"A o~unfj 0..10\ A"~VO_Ci'4.tii' nJ' p_m;:ilii www.dti:t~n~fot"125.t:orn TO All ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAI,S J ~ REDUUiPCONGESTION (JL~c;~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~~~,-~?~- (/ ~ \ NAME rD~ttiLt'<\0 ADDRESS , l E-MAIL '\)p. 'l-\Y I ~, '<<.~~L -~ .' . ''(; ~-~~ .f......;,.<~ ~~ / ~~""Th~ q\\ ~~. DanalVfl ~lIa/191"C/rlO qlO ~ ~-f ..~ ~l\ g{lAA ,,0aj:/ fllO /6 fiij' l~l;lA OI;\Jwe:,> -1Iq{( '1;Un 11l~c_(\v'O For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, eA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e..mail www.citizcnsfor125.com / LYAiPADRI6VrJ "., ( .. lee ^",^, Cw:>vuff' c.<,,'- ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS j.J REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. lJCf a / If) REDUCE CONGESTION jt~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-~L .rl I j I SIGNATURE l2.o~ LC~ \.PI-'t.. " , -/~;-' )', ,/ I Ri~Ia.~,:> 'f)' 1(078 For mOl", ""'JrIl"lUon ana petitiOns contact: Citizens for 125 -' ..," j/h.) ( ,) ,/ f~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E.MAIL SIGNATURE A J f-h12IC-Y FfLy Frz, 'J}" ' '/1 Ij/' (/ . ()., 'I ! I". / . W'_"" "d_ (" (/)!<.U( ~J~.F:Z - ~'Ct{/~I"(t~ ~~.. -'~~~ h~ ( . ! \.. . -, V ~1'~~'\ )1~'" ---=- \<-:t:-C(''-' J{!, :(iJ;\~\<;~,,: l /) -- . -i f:., 1M fll{ i .{. -by;;; --..\:yrr- -! ~ ::::- ~ ~~--. I --, AIl '-. 1/14 ./ - \.--,-'} . )t-l.. ." /. <., "./_k,< _ ,-.~ ~ Ie!;, ~ 1/ Vtl--,l,1 "., \t,.,;".", :J For more l..._..........v" OilY tJlGl"iUUII~ t;onwct: LltlZenS for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (6'19) 472-'1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY'I+ef JJi tf~0 REDUUE UONGESTION ,~r- STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. - NAM. E itaI ~~ ;, .. , l.~/;0j E-MAIL < L.~ ~I ClYl~1k Q~nu C4 i /); F;rVV1F1~~L =t:-'(~Clf.:\j~I\\fn~ . :>...~,-rx:; '--E::-~'l.'! <t.~,:~ ~___ ~J VI _ _ J:1ILMl\fl LV jJ t:}N~tJ , ~"""''7 V'fA"} <;: le./ "lqnjo Un ~(.tC) C'bKV(!wkj \j ',U,.- {tv.~~L,tf'-:) '\1, c;;~ k'!-~_ \'-i? v I.... ~ ..._ r~11 rIA v\r" \' .\\ " (/ I / 'IV -",. ,- \\)1 ...)) rid k~ II, ;11: 'I . , For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com \}) ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE _~6'_____ _-.-.... . - __~~'IA&!'f'!L . "-..."JJ.I....._.;"j...._~__ - -? .~ /..OUi~ R. ~ ~~-d .~~ &Y'I~' 124;-,,.)/1 P-Cl1o VI ''j lVlt~v~r( ('1..(1 "jAIl U' /0V4aDevaM~_ _ ,I ,,1 . -:/ dJ 17 (I, ..../ AJ,e~.-'V'.~4 r/ /-:;';)'1.~~.d-~ (' ; \ . ~rJ1<n/(~~ ;:iu~ ':C~l ~( "1) . (,e ,/-- ) I , , ~)~ 1 q/q(j) ~M ,I}.o--0 - -::: /iJ ;l J I.. /a l ~r\\,;h:. CIlCq<:-. \(}.~ ~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 () Bonita. .CA 91902. (619) 472-7447. or e-mail www.dti~<>n5for1 2"irnm -1--- m:iiilI.!J3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! 9 We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE s .:c.. x;,. Ie ;." . C~~'1;:.pc: ~ (IT- < ) ~ n\ 8 Y ( (2) ~ --- ) For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 1l'Il~'_:"'._ ""..It. ............"'4"; ?.(,ol0'''' ~~"O"\ .............. __ _ __...._.!,.._._ _ _.,. ~ ~__ 1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING'SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS J!i li\-f-i'rr ..J ' ~~ ~_ E~c I. Rorn-AMt J ~.;.{ u"J,!~U;A_ a E-MAIL SIGNATURE \(C(~o - I,?-./J 'f II / I '", -J:: " ~..."" '" ,od, FrQ1\C', ~CD J. ;2.<V' (") I (t;."'4"'C'1 ><-oJs;; ~T..... ,,,vlI"l Jc>'t~__. ~/~ :::7A.r- ()- , -.: For more inrormatlon and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 1i:J.....""':oGo... r.A 010nn (,(.411'\\ ..-,n "fA"'" _...- _..:l.........._:"':____.:_~...nll::' ___ Imi:ir!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. H-a (/W/ q-uv (/~ REDUCE CONGESTION c1tJ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS q(01/ E-MAIL SIGNATURE (.\: t<l1 L9-+IOy\Ct ^/V' ~4 For more Imorrnatlon ana petitions comacr: <..ltIzens for 125 &tn_nit~ ("Ii 010"''''') 1.1.10'\ ..l'7(,L7/iJj&, ,n.,~n_.7in~iI u..'U....u.p;..i................e'_..'Iln~ ............... . ."~~_4_"_ ~f~ ~~DIO ~Vi3tTL- APJ~ ~- I~ 1~ REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! .t:t-3 TO ALL ElECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. -We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. E-MAIL / NAME ADDRESS /____--- ') j, / / \j : )(tW Mi (.,AWl f'>i/l /(}IJfi, ~~~;;.,- )~ ..,.- ~ Y;;;;>E.>' . % /I>>77'1'"lo..} , ?p-) > tsj,~ ~~A~~~ )$; 1-rtt,Cl ' tk,~ " j2fr\C'\c. fmn ph 't:::,,.,.,~ SK...~ ~. ."~" '- I~ - :-"'01 . ;K tt(~'n ~;r -k7h' ~~~ For more Inrormatlon ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 I:il........;+~ rA o.."n.n IL4n\ A"Jn 7.1117 _...... _...ll......... _:..=___.....:_..oIinr:: _...._ 1 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the Sari Diego Regional Transportation plan. . i . . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to DowntoV(ri, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown\~'i11 be redused by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME 6/{J r I U. J31a /J (l () If.t.e;!Q,drth'hlr> A . MIi \.d~p. l~ AI" J'I(JJ//j t( 'Il.L{t7U7. F\~~'~ v/v4 :d I:L'7M- "L l7-cy' ji! lJ W /1~j) / For more inform, Bonita, CA 91902, (61 ,.c- t/I/Y(f'/{d/l&{;,J/ _~IIS contact: Citizens for 125 ,_ . .,~-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 1- q ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. ' . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by govern ":lent red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~ ADDRESS ~" /I1d fe~-; ~ IC'.G... \. W'f>S < ,Y'\..JVI.M...- ~. f,..~ ~:MAIL . '. /4{1:1-{/( fie L 21 iJt:~'l' 11", h 'I !' ~/JJY 1 For more inrormation and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 J-. Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com J> ~ c;;i7 ---0 If _ -1 I , lCJ /I' i ;fv ('1/ - ?!!/t'~i' y. {t((f'f({ , /fltl () j/tf;dJ!~ q // ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: , . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS -J {) /I1tJ J-!llClI(}A'!. CO , SIGNATURE ~.(.~- t')~~_i~~~ ~''''''''~'....,. ..,.,. -'".. .' ... ..-=,. Dc..M r..-r. , ;1 , h r l'i11Vl B--~<:Y},) _ l'~' ',,-..: (' ~AU r {}/d ,/ J"L,.. 1'-+ ~..,- 'T',::!K \,-N E. f;~:i/;rr~ ~ SIl.,11l I ,'Jd it ~=~-~ ':'r:51'1 () tJ- AUA.uL ,f"JtJ)g.f'M' flY ;?;:::--a ~ .T/E ~<<~ ~., / .... .' ~J..it,f - t c (t<:', . " c_ F' 6 ,,- , ',,' ~7, tt fd5D .' 'I' ~4.'^ [I" /., ". . .1/ ~'Ci" '../ ,:r' ,.." C ';.. I ' ~t ~v\ lrx\\\5'~ tIt 1'\\( ,\'ri~ iTq( .~~~ - ./), "", For more inform_..vll and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! g We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS (je/Y' //1 L' L ,,) Sc: t;J. . ~.A.lev ,c. .. I A-0 <S"l-Ha-? ~ ~eJ{L +<\ ve~ t -lJ '"' "f'\ YH d(,{Ti l \v.~ \11':'); l\ k Cln~~, I3clh'1 ~/l Mj,I)<iffr;p~ E-MAIL /#~ --------------~--- For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 !3onita, CA Q190!?, (1',19) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com f m:iiiI!I9 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAl, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. , ! NAMY ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE t; bL\ ~(7 Yo ""- ~# &1;~ Z~},eAfW" . IN ~ -" . ;. . ,0 // .~~ ---.. ..... For ml,.!'l;. 'I 11",,,'_U;J\,'VI I UII.... ....'I{.~I!.IVI'.;JI .........11"-'101"".... ""1"1"'~'tOllS for 125 Bonita, CA 91902.. (619) 412-7441, or e-mail www.dtilf:nsfor125.com TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. Hcj~A1 Cfo. REDUCE CONGESTION j;t~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, ~PPROVE SR -125 NOW! "~ We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. \.. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL J;: S \..~... * - l\~i\ \)~ \t\ \\\ u tIer "1/113 ~. Vtll e~.l ~ ~. e>1rZAtJA z;/ffI/1r ~..........i'\t.o 13........,.,.:..J ~.~..~-;--,-_.- ~_.C. . ....~ ~..".--- 1~". ((;".- For rrlo._ ......,......."1......11 GIll.... tJ'C.t.lt.IVII:) \"Vlll.a.....l.. ....II.ILt:IIS for 125 Bonitil, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e.mail www.citizensfor125.com . t &~o....~ '}...~~ PETITION . TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. \JuMJ Griu. REDUCE CONGESTION '. ~?' TOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! "" ~I We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL - ... ... ~ . /; ~J~~ \V\~\\~ . c'"' ~ \e~ .. .t!.\e~ '. ~ ~=--- . (, (::-.~ '- -' ",,[..----. -' "'-, ,"" . '---. , - -. --,.- ~ - ~ \{r'~11- ,.....- lj [/.d') ..' -', ,'(i) .. <(.', " ,- ) ~ For mOl.... ............'UI,IVII allY ..,~\I"'VII;) \,.VIILc.H..l; \..IULfc::'ns for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447. or ",-m;o;1 www ~,..__~_.__"^. .. ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALt STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS /';1 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ~!.t,J cf REDUCE CONGESTION M~Lt{r _K~ P GOVERNMENT DELAYS, (!t~ PPROVE SR-125 NOW! \ the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS Th-r Sltv\l * h ~v,._ .~ E-MAIL 7UR~ . )p.v I\:=..Q ZrJl'lilcP ? .,-~_.-.~-- .- / Gj , ' \, I -(' h .J, r i.'.-, .. ,~\I . i~- ',' l - I' -{ ^ ' {~. ",. - . -~ . ""I ,. " ) r .! /' ... . .." .;"" -.'; I,," ,"'-> ""I'd, c ,n.--- , i ,~I.,\,,,\ 'I For more Information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or e.,mail www.citizensfor125.com ' i'V' ,-', ' _\ ' . \,1-' ):' ,)' , _Cd'l.' &{ // j.. . :o:-.-/r ./ J... --- ~ REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE _:z~.~ '~_ 1IR...' t!<l,S' V.,q... ~ell ~~k /- (Lr- ;h:; ,^:,~t. 'k)\, ! vi,'1 i -:;tJ1: , ':J; ,... I . 1 ,......." f/ (11 ClS, ~Y\~ / .. [' . ., <.. ..Ili'O_:/C> _ / For more mrormatlon ana peutlons comact: \.lUzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, on~-mail www.citizensforI25.com ~ ~ TO ALL ELEctED FEDERAL, St~T~ lOC~ OfFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO OOtlNTY:' REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, y//tlPPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional j Transportation plan. r;; · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. "--:--- . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by gov~rnment red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL >~ '- -4~''"~_: '( c,. Net .,1 I - =------~~ - For more infOrmation ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com { ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAl, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT BELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS _. . n, ~ ,-~ E-MAIL ~ I/f' './11.4 IJ /?, 'fIlL , evr;i L~ J~U """~\ ~eMvck~_ Y$T1'~" J;J.,fayO M I~uk.i, F~ ~ ;' '.~ ~~ S ~ 1Tll::n:= j{ ,( ~ ~ ~(,~ ;;', ~,v.) } t ?Zt2ft @ 'J~cr - "I~~~'~ ~~ ~Q \ _~. ,.,Wo- b \o~ r)w'~f ~ - Fo~ more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizp.n~f<>r1C}'; mil' ~ { ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~~ , (\yLt1~~ ADDRESS <;pI I.-J!z " ~ _ I E-M"tl~. SIGtlATURE ) 4~:,:7 tf'~~ /C:,J" -. 'V~ I ~tL)L r L:: "1 (rid -----:::"',:" I /" Il c eLl(n. '9 AP~ j"", / For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita. CA 91902. (619\ 472-7447. nr "-",,,II wwwrltIT"nofnr1<l" r,,~ 1.-: rliliiiiI!I9 TO All ElECTED FEDERAl, STATE AND lOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUEUONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. 8\.~ Do~ 11-Ifk. H ADDRESS E-MAIL , SIGNATU~E ~ 7t-~ :~2>, ~rhk . /11 /!1 C~ ~@'1 ~ I:)~ ff)~'(1U{:L .~ 1\ l j ~ "f:" . ( r; ~ocJ 11Jt fAJfl.C,V'7/,) "~~o. r. ".. ~ r more Inrormatlon ana petitions contact: lltlzens for 125 ( ------ Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447. or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com . r ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE b. v<"; <~ - -/'-lie J...dl.l '/J,S ....."') _ f q{q/O /... 9/ (/vJ4. ~~"'S For mor~ IlIlUIIIIClUUII dllU fJt':uuons contact: t..mzens for 125 l1aniUl, CA 91902, (619) 472.:1447, 01' .2-mail WIINt,dtizensfor'12.5.com ~ ImiiI!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congesticm on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. 7fE ~ 3 1~,1 ?Ar-r ~ESS <f 7 Cf ;;1,4 kl \A I .c:- -----lI \J11-145/1 KA M ,)}G.I/ _ IO,'2li r?ellC-14N IJ.I~ )''{/'Cf:l. . ctL)3~ 1) 0n~SCl (!Oc,wo.- ~nerr~ l5mt-tVL E.MAIL SIGNATURE ~;, A- 0' t'H2./2..rs';l1 JJj l? ~ For more im_, ",u..v.. '''''' tJ",,,,,,,ms contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com 7 Zf:.3 ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. SIGNATURE ct:a::-~~ ma~, ~?L-L ;t~~~ . : &fS!rnf{::~ ADDRESS E-MAIL ./' For mor.. II11u,"''',"UII dno petitiOns contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com m:iiiir!I9 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAlSA ) 19 REDUUEEPUONGESTION' ~t( STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS SIGNATURE J:-MAIL //. JI"/ . 8{\O'NLL j<:xf-,aV\ , -1lp/f ir1 () 111JMJ1111) For me __ ______...~.. _.._ p"'-.............hl "'''''....0\".... '-IUL,,"IIS for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com (p ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE : ' "C:- 0}1 ,7: )/3'( L!A /? 01 reAl' \ ~ 'lH:.,.' '. -, j ~~0~ !k(O I (fJrdSDI'\ Iv c "I" , , i7'/o gJL For mOr" informatiOn ana petitiOns contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, Sft.Tr A~~OC~ OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS 'J (, '--- ~ '1-1 /~ %1'31 ~ I&~ ~ . -.I ~/lPt~O~I~= ~ "~"-c/ ( ,/,/~ E-MAIL SIGNATURE "!)'J'II(J ": . / J. Il.-/}-Yl-i.- Yoi' / , ., 1 ~l \: (\ . 'CI ~ ~ ,.,. .J! -- ... '1// ~1tg?~.. . /Li-z//.-.( ~ >C:--~z-jf/ 'OJ, _ ~,_.-"--- ~ I 1. ~ , For more iL,_...._..~.. g"", """"''''''~ contact: (;Itizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-7447. or p.m..iI \''''''''~'.''___'_'''M 11 ~ miiiI!ID TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFI9AI.$ . 5 REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. jfqt~~lLl ~ REDUUE UONGESTION tiS STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS ~"J"~ ~~ i-~~. ~ <J~~~rJfJ ~~Ul" E-MAil SIGNATURE ~ ~ " ~ Jv('y'V:JI\71LPI ;;T!~_ J<p, ~~ h N./VI-/- _ , 5--- ~c'uc~~ ~~~~~ ~ '!;;tlf'ltr J For morl... 1I1!\.,IIIIIc.1UVli allU JJfClIlIons contact: 1.ItIzens for '125 Bonit.a, CA 9190\2, (619) 4"72.7447, or e-mail www,citizensfor125,cQfl1 r Ltc.... ImiiI!l3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! .~ We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduc~ traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME, ADDRESS ............- ~--~~~~:~-k ,/~ y 1) 1/-1 G L.E De SJ'>/ 3:u~ \ E.MAIL ~~~.. " '- ""'~--' ({eAt:.. (f)<e/},ICdZ,&' .JZ:6 t,{(C'[Z:J"12N 'r'7,011~ T)~~'?f\~"r^A.J . "" /~ ') For mor.. ""..."",a"VII dllO petitiOns contact: Citizens for 5 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfo125.com s ( ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAL REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ,- E-MAIL "0 .~~ C~._ ~ /,;/--<11 ~~ ~l(J1I';' .J:;:b~ --- /() "?tP? U-f~.ft'--%- NAME ADDRESS 9fiM-fn1 {,,/~( G r/. c:.,.-",('( J:gAR.I< R.1(1(r.:.~'5 /!2-~~ p~Lo: . - :1' For mo~_ ......................1 .......... t'~..I.........I... ......""...g'"'... ....il".&'tO.II.:;; for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (6'19) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com o " ,.." ./ -' --/.._-,.... ," ".. '.. .-...--'- ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, SfATE~ND LbCA[)OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. A!>!>~ES.S /'. .' _ .~IL '" '/1 ~ rr9"r 9'/ 1/lli / \ For mot", .monnauon ana petitions contact: Citizens for i 25 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! 5" We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME C~,\S eLM-if-- ktI-Oit. ~ GA&~c }Z:;~{; U -1/?()fi/AJ; A ~ ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE-e:! fj(}5v<f,<;d~f"oI.la}>. (j2}ze- .~.. I=) /3 :lZ- I'or more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com r l{ ! ~ TO ALL ElECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS \ /tlhkfo 4ASF'{L f(u ctil. ~(f~ J - , - ///U,U;(/'YLJ'-- -:'~ -.2 E-MAIL .... ;"J I ~ I 12 For more Intonm:ltIon ana petl{lo"~ <.u,",,,..,, "'UL"'''' for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ;> =..3 ImiiI!]3 TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALt STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS _qeloeJl~ (t') ~ IYl-- f?.lJ YH,:;,.t/J 1 EOPA. \:>&1. \, i.., Kv..~ _ E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~~~ ',q16 For morl. II IIVImuuvlI QIIY iJft;lIl,IVII:I \"vlIl.c:n..l.; \.Hlzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com Li'1.. ., ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERALI STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has ....oen delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfull' officeholder to see that SR 125 '''11 use the influence as an elected .ltl,out further delay. NAME ADDRESS G ATURE <::=,<, ie:' L /!z:.., I Y y - 2-/lA. -j , , , .; !Iv!',;. y -...-J' ) - , , I ,\ {)./ 0.-.(..'h#tA VI )0' ~~rfie/[ - :,...61'........... ---- I / ,J . ./1 .-:.; . rv tI /:l:.f .' ~;;;?Z~L~~V. .. ./ ~Yx . f-' ..... ' . J...t:rr .-; f. ./"'.--~ J:~'d_'t..:' 2'n;:- / - --- ..".-" ~",...., ~ ~- _"___',,,",,.,,,,,,",~.,,,._..,.'_ .' ..... ""'..",0 For more information and petitions'COrrtact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ -: ~-,-- .,-_.,~ g, ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, SfuE5AN~6cA~FFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL ..'1 For more information ana petltlOn~ <-VIII.a..,. '-..,~'-..~ for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: , . The construction of SR 125 South is a vitallink,1n the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE vJ~. ~ ~p~ \~r~ :'17.1 1 fi;( I l , For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com v ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL! STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIAL~ ( . / REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. fit{ ;JfJ!T!< Lffl,/REDUCE CONGESTION 4S ~ STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, y /~] APPROVE SR -125 NOW! \.: w. e undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE . ~~Pfl),"~. ~ Au r !lo-rn 1!({~-0jjd-1 ;'--(L0d g !JTt3Lf..o mCil/sl1 II For more InfOrmatiOn ana petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 412-1447, or e-mail I.!ww.citizensfor125.com ~ ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. .-- We the undersigned respectfUlly request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ~ ) """l:CC E-MAIL , tl/- ~I f) For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-1447, or e-mail WW.N.citizensfor125.com I ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. - ~~~_._= E-MAIL SIGNATURE ~ - ~~r:z:~ For more information and petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUUE UONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: :feD f'f\ ; ''D pnJ m · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE ""L.W"" ~ cbe/("d !Y ~ D~ \-loW! ..Jf. chGu-1fe{jc-O /3(;)">7 >1, '-' Itfev. -II VZ- A>:Ic\u:j M/lrNO ft{ (J.fr'O- FucH.r 0~JJ rA-o~ V ~t+w,\>i:::'(J)I/L\.:t ~~lji RU <; LAo / J\NWA UD ./ Ck.i ,Y'f)-nE ~J ( }/Clkho. bo (j L!V!\ 0, L-A 0 <i-r67~ ~l-\.-\.; "4 H IJ-./.--, '7 ~ wCfrtv. r~T 1& \le3lV - (if oJ r;)9c;r. ce, <PMHP/ ~y_ C) eaa 0 uO--O' :::;~~;$~ For more InTOrmatlOn ana petitions contact: I.ltIzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.dtizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: ve 0 YV\ : 1) Pn-J , (V) . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. " 1(') q,)!~c. !- NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL (" f?~eilaN -----::.. For mc,... "..v""""VII ""0 petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: ~ (20 M m . The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. . SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. . SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% . The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. ADDRESS E-MAIL L :c. ~I~~ !11J-11..fc {OR I D6(~ -_J:;. "" M tf , qjqlO ~IIK "~ For more information and petitions contact: ~ltIzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ,''----. TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR -125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: :F'(lO M '. DAN H D jIV) · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. - J S'll vc-- j t:Zlt/~ ADDRESS E-MAIL - ~<-f=F. c , I .-.::::- ~'~ ~~ '/ ALTy ----J 'm )TC h pt7rec. ;JC Tfx~E ~ .JAtJi)oIAL _ '1:5 l,- IAlo;1f1,tJ;" /1fffJ f2-cl Joh" n Q.1"'\<<n, ~ )!HtUDtm~~ ArlT- ~56~j 'I- A //rIC 1: t) f1 ~~ . I . ' . <. "'1 7'.- '~:pr(}JVl\V \J Ol'tV I For mor,=, ""v",,a"UII dllU p"tmons contact: I.ltIzens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472.7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com ~ TO ALL ELECTED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS REPRESENTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY. REDUCE CONGESTION STOP GOVERNMENT DELAYS, APPROVE SR-125 NOW! We the undersigned believe that: '~~OVV\ 1))010 yYl · The construction of SR 125 South is a vital link in the San Diego Regional Transportation plan. · SR 125 will significantly reduce traffic congestion on local streets, 1-5 and 1-805. · SR 125 will shorten commute times to Downtown, Otay Mesa, and North County. Example: Drive time from Eastlake to downtown will be reduced by 34%, to Otay Mesa reduced by 75% · The construction of SR 125 has been delayed by government red-tape for years. We the undersigned respectfully request that you use the influence as an elected officeholder to see that SR 125 is approved and built without further delay. NAME P It ItJ r ADDRESS E-MAIL SIGNATURE GClDI,("...... ~ v-tAeetc.~ \<~~ t:>~i--otmdl;l.c01Tl ~~ ~ '^ e/vw" - C&v'Y1 Ak ~ 1)p.,N t-tnvV'l rr<~ ~U WI 0vl -J~f."y SV\"')eror C-.fiLtA 51A. IVI [::; M /1-)c}r.OIt1 1SEmlsl-lh' '~/~~ 54, 'rt!' J. IIJ/>>l;r; , For mu,,,, III1U""dllon dnc petitions contact: Citizens for 125 Bonita, CA 91902, (619) 472-7447, or e-mail www.citizensfor125.com