HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/01/15 Item 5
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
~f:.. CITY OF
CHULA VISTA
c:.
1/15/08, Item~
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR OTAY RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION
IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA (CIP NO. PR-
277), PROJECT TO RANDALL CONSTRUCTION IN THE
AMOUNT OF $392,030 AND APPROPRIATING COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS THEREFOR
l\ lY\
GENERAL SERVICED J<J
7/
CITY MANAGER
ASSISTANT CITY
ITEM TITLE:
4/5THS VOTE: YES 0 NO [gJ
BACKGROUND
On January 2,2008 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Engineering and General Services received five
(5) sealed bids for the "Otay Recreation Center Expansion in the City of Chula Vista, California"
(CIP No. PR-277)" project. Prior to this, on August 22, 2007, the City had advertised and
opened bids on this project. Due to the contractors being non-responsive and with advice from
the City Attorney's Office, staff rejected all previous bids and re-advertised the project for new
bids. After re-advertising and conducting a pre-bid question and answer session, valid bid
packages were submitted and staff recommends awarding the contract for "Otay Recreation
Center Expansion in the City of Chula Vista, California (CIP No. PR-277)" project to Randall
Construction Co.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies
for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the State
CEQA Guidelines because the proposed project consists of minor alterations to an existing
public facility involving no expansion of the facility's current use. Thus, no further
environmental review is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Council adopt the resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
5-1
1/15/08 Item~
Page 2 of 3
DISCUSSION
On Wednesday, August 22, 2007 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Engineering and General Services
received six (6) sealed bids for the "Otay Recreation Center Expansion (CIP No. PR-277)"
project. Strict adherence to the contract administration guidelines established by the State of
California and by the Federal Community Block Grant programs is required to avoid potential
loss of future funding. Upon close examination of the bid documents from all bids received, and
with advice from the City Attorney's Office, several errors by the contractors cause the received
bids to be non-responsive. On November 13,2007, by Resolution 2007-266, Council rejected all
six (6) bids and directed staff to re-advertise the project.
Staff re-advertised the project and on December 12, 2007, a mandatory pre-bid meeting was
held. Staff conducted a "question and answer" session with all interested prospective bidders to
assist them in understanding the documents required for Community Block Grant projects.
On January 2, 2008, the Director of Engineering and General Services received five (5) valid
sealed bids for the "Otay Recreation Center Expansion in the City of Chula Vista, California
(CIP No. PR-277)" project. The work consists of construction of an expansion to the existing
facility of 1,376 sq. ft. to be used as a classroom for the community.
Proiect Bid Results
With the aid of architectural consultant, Davy Architecture, and the City of Chula Vista's
Engineering and General Services Department, the plans, contract documents and technical
specifications for the "Otay Recreation Center Expansion in the City of Chula Vista, California
(CIP No. PR-277)" project were prepared and the project was re-advertised.
Staff received and opened bids on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. The lowest
responsive bidder for the project was the contractor who submitted all required documents
detailed in the contract documents and who submitted the lowest base bid for the project
construction. The following contractors met all the project requirements and submitted all
required documents detailed in the contract documents. Bids from the five (5) contractors were
received as follows (bids sorted by the base bid amount):
CONTRACTOR BASE BID
l. Randall Construction - San Diego, CA $392,030.00
2. Michael Minos Construction - San Diego, CA $399,000.00
3. Fordyce Construction - Santee, CA $406,596.00
4. DEZ Construction - El Cajon, CA $451,700.00
5. Structures West - Escondido, CA $457,000.00
The low bid from Randall Construction is comparable to the low bid of $391,754.00 that was
rejected in November of 2007, a deviation of $276 or .07%. The original Architect's estimate
for the project was $250,000, based upon the budget that was established in fiscal year 2005-06.
City staff will incorporate the unit price bid results received into a database for future project
cost estimates.
5-2
1/15/08 Item S
Page 3 of 3
Disclosure Statement
Attachment 1 is a copy of the Contractor's Disclosure Statement.
Wage Statement
The work to be performed under this contract is a project assisted under Community Block Grant
(CDBG) program providing direct Federal financial assistance from the Department of Housing
and Urban Development (BUD) and is subject to the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing
and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, 12 U.S.C. 170 lu.
Contractors are obligated to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them for work under
this contract. Federal prevailing wages are those determined by the U.S. Department of Labor.
Wages must be paid weekly.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings
within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property, which is the subject of this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund. The funds for these improvements have been provided
from the Southwest Town Center Redevelopment Fund, Community Block Grant, and State
Recreation Grants. Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require only routine
City building maintenance.
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Contract Amount $392,030.00
B. Contingencies (approx. 15%) $58,804.00
C. Design & Survey Costs $76,360.00
D. Construction Inspection & Special Inspections Costs $80,406.00
TOTAL FUNDS REQillRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $607,600.00
PROJECT BUDGET FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. State Recreation Grants $80,000.00
B. Community Block Grant (CDBG) $220,000.00
C. Additional CDBG funds from available fund balance $7,600.00
D. Redevelopment Funds $300,000.00
TOTAL BUDGET FOR CONSTRUCTION $607,600.00
ATTACHMENTS
1. Contractor's Disclosure Statement
Prepared by: Don Brown, Sr. Project Supervisor, Engineering and General Sen;ices Department
M:\General Services\GS Administration\Council Agenda\Otay Rec Center Expansion (PR277)\PR277 Re-advemsed.12192007 .mLdoc
5-3
ATTACHMENT
/
CITY OF CHULA V1STADISCLOS1JRE STATE:M:ENT
,
,
Pursuantto Counci1Policy 101-01, prior to anyac:tion upon matterS that willrequi:re discretionary action by the
Council, Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain
ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City ofCbula Vista election must
be filed. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that" is .thesubject of the
application or the cOIIl:ract, e.g., Q;'I"!ler, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier.
~fA
2. If any person" identified pursuant to (1) aboye is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals with a $2000 investment in the business (corporationlpartnershi:p) entity.
;vIA-
3. If any person" identified pursuant to (1) aboye is a non-profit organization fIr trust, list the names of
any person serving as director of the non-profit orgmrization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of
the trust.
NfA
4.
Please identify every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent con1ractars
you haye assigned to represent you before the City in I:bis matter.
tllA
I
5.
Has anyper:son" associated with I:bis contract.ha.d my ~qat9:~gS ~-~~l1i~alr of the City
ofCbula VIsta as ItreLrtes to I:bis contractmthin thepast.12,l;t\\>Dith~? 'tea~fio~
,;1/(4 .-.,':'
5-4
If Yes, briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official"" may have in this
contract.
AI/A
6.
Have you made a contr;cuti~ of m= i:hllI! $2~ within the past twelve (1~) months to a =ent
member of the Chula VISta CIty Council? No JL Yes:..... If yes, which Councll member?
i1/(A
7.
Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official"" of the City
of ChuIa Vista in the past twelve (12) months? (This includes being a source of income, money
to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc.) Yes _ No.JL:. '
If Y esj;hiCh official" and what was the nature of item provided?
^';.4
Date: 12-/Cf-07
(2
Signature of ontractor/Applicant
'fpYlrlaLl Gv1Sf>r'I('-h~ (/11 C.
Pnnt or type name of Con'(;fTJCJ~d.af/
"
Person is defined as: any individual, firm, cO-Partnership, joint venture, association, social club,
fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city,
municipality, district, or other political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a
"unit. - . "u. . ,
..
Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, COUIlcil member, Planning Commissioner,
Member of a board, commission, or committee of the Qty, employee, or staff members.
5-5
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR OTAY RECREATION CENTER
EXPANSION IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA (CIP NO. PR-277) PROJECT TO RANDALL
CONSTRUCTION CO. IN THE AMOUNT OF $392,030
AND APPROPRIAnNG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS THEREFOR
WHEREAS, on Wednesday, August 22, 2007 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Engineering
and General Services received six (6) sealed bids; and
WHEREAS, strict adherence to the contract administration guidelines established by the
State of California and by the Federal Community Block Grant program is required to avoid
potential loss of future funding; and
WHEREAS, upon close examination of the bid documents from all bids received, and
with advice from the City Attorney's Office, several errors by the contractors cause the received
bids to be non-responsive; and
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2007, by Resolution 2007-266, Council rejected all bids
and directed staff to re-advertise the project; and
WHEREAS, staff re-advertised the project and conducted a "question and answer"
session for the prospective bidders to assist the bidders in understanding the documents required
for Community Block Grant projects and better assure the City of Chula Vista receive responsive
bids; and
WHEREAS, the work consists of construction of an expansion to the existing facility of
1,376 sq. ft. to be used as a classroom for the community; and
WHEREAS, on January 2, 2008 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Engineering and General
Services received five ()) sealed bids for follows:
CONTRACTOR BASE BID
1. Randall Construction Co. - San Diego, CA $392,030.00
2. Michael Mihos Construction Co. - San Diego, CA $399,000.00
3. Fordyce Construction Co. - Santee, CA $406,596.00
4. DEZ Construction Co. - EI Cajon, CA $451,700.00
5. Structures West - Escondido ,CA $457,000.00
5-6
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed this bid, verified references on the contractor and
recommends awarding the contract to Randall Construction for $392,030; and
WHEREAS, there is no impact to the General Fund as the additional funding necessary
to complete the project will be provided for from the Southwest Town Center Redevelopment
Fund; Community Block Grant; and State Recreation Funds.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby accept bids and award contract for the "Otay Recreation Center Expansion in
the City of Chula Vista, California (CIP No. PR-277)" project to Randall Construction in the
amount of $392,030 and appropriate Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
therefo r.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~Oi\A~n
Ann Moore
City Attorney
Jack Griffin
Director General Services
5-7