The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007/12/18 Item 3 Item 3 Meeting Date 12/18/2007 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: Report Regarding the Development Impact Fee (OIF), Park Acquisition and Development (PAD) Fee, and Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Funds for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007 SUBMITTED BY: Resolution No. Finding that the Unexpended Funds in the Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Fund are still needed to provide for construction of facilities for which the fees were collected d- h"v niL- Director of Finance/Treasurer I' r Director of Budget and Analysis W \191 Director of Eng.inet:~ and General Services DP- . dry M_~ ~ (.ISTUS V,,~ V,,-N..xJ REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: State Government Code Section 66000 requires local agencies assessing Development Impact Fees (DIF) and sewer capacity charges to make available specified financial data to the public each fiscal year. These reports satisfY that requirement and have been available in the City Clerk's office for public review since November 30, 2007. We have also included the report on Parkland Acquisition and Development (PAD) fees in the same report for ease of reference and convenience to the public. Local agencies are also required to make findings every five years for any DIF funds remaining unexpended that identifY the purpose of the fee and demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it was charged. This year, the City has identified unexpended fees that were on deposit for five or more years and has elected to make the required findings. RECOMMENDATION: That Council accepts the report and approve the Resolution. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable. DISCUSSION: The City of Chula Vista collects several types of Development Impact Fees (OIFs), Parkland Acquisition and Development fees, and Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve fees, which were assessed during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007. The major categories of facilities financed via OIFs 3-1 Item .3 Meeting Date 12/18/2007 include transportation, traffic signals, pedestrian bridges, drainage, sewer and public facilities. Development Impact Fees are updated in two manners, either via a comprehensive DIF program review, or via a Council enacted automatic annual adjustment, based upon an appropriate index. Two DIF programs were comprehensively updated during the subject fiscal year. The first such update relates to the Otay Ranch Villages 1,5, and 6 Pedestrian Bridge DIF. In February 2007, this fee program was amended to include Otay Ranch Village 2. This action amended the program's area of benefit and facility list, and recalculated the program fee based upon revised construction cost estimates. This update increased the fee from $783 to $1,114 per single-family dwelling unit. The second comprehensive DIF program update relates to the City's Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF), which was presented to Council in October 2006. This action increased the PFDIF from $5,489 to $7,891 per single-family dwelling unit. In October of 2006, the following automatic index based annual adjustments went into effect: . Transportation DIF was increased from $10,050 to $10,455 per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). . Traffic Signal fee was increased from $26.65 to $27.70 per average daily vehicle trip. . Otay Ranch Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF was increased from $1,808 to $1,865 per single farnily dwelling unit. . Park and Acquisition fee was increased from $8,962 to $9,122 for Areas West of I-80S and $16,644 to $16,804 for Areas East ofI-805 Other fees addressed in this report remain at the same rate as the previous fiscal year. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (TDlF) This fee was adopted on January 12, 1988 by Ordinance 2251 to fmance and coordinate the construction of new transportation facilities so that streets are built when needed. This fee is applicable to all new development east of I-80S. Prior to the program, streets were built by developers in a fragmented fashion with 6-lane facilities, necking down to 2-lanes and expanding back to 6 lanes again. In addition, there was a fairness issue since some developers fronted on large streets and others did not. Now all developers in the Eastern portion' of Chula Vista pay the same fee per dwelling unit and either the City constructs the street or a developer does. If the developer constructs the street they will receive a TDIF fee credit when they apply for a building permit. The TDIF program was last comprehensively updated in 2005, increasing the fee per EDU to $10,050. This fee was subject to an annual index-based adjustment; in October of 2006 the fee 3-2 Item :3 Meeting Date 12/18/2007 was increased to $10,455 per EDU. The fees for other land use types, as well as detailed FY07 financial information, are presented in Attaclunent A - Schedule 1. TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEE This fee was adopted to provide for the projected traffic signal needs of the City that result from increases in traffic volume caused by development. As funds are accumulated they are expended on traffic signal projects. This citywide fee is assessed per trip generated, and was increased from $26.65 to $27.70 per trip in October 2006. Detailed FY07 financial information is presented in Attaclunent A - Schedule 2. TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF This fee is applicable to all new development within the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin and has remained unchanged since 1998. Detailed FY07 financial information is presented in Attaclunent A - Schedule 3. TELEGRAPH CANYON GRAVITY SEWER DIF This fee is for the expansion of the trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties. The fee has remained unchanged at $216.50 per EDU since 1998. Detailed FY07 financial information is presented in Attaclunent A - Schedule 4. PUMPED SEWER DIF This fee was adopted by the City to finance the facilities necessary to the Telegraph Canyon sewer main due to out-of-basin flows from the Salt Creek Basin. The name was changed from Telegraph Canyon Sewer Pumped Flows Development Impact Fee to Pumped Sewer Development Impact Fee due to the addition of Poggi Canyon Basin Sewer Interceptor as one of the facilities financed by this fee. The fee was repealed in November 2004 under Ordinance 2990-A due to the construction of Salt Creek Trunk Sewer and there is no longer any need to pump flows out of the Salt Creek Basin. Detailed FY07 financial information is presented in Attaclunent A - Schedule 4. POGGI CANYON SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE This fee was adopted to provide the necessary financing to construct a trunk sewer in the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin from a proposed regional trunk sewer west of I-80S along Olympic Parkway to the boundary of Eastlake. The fee was established at $400 per equivalent dwelling unit and has remained unchanged since 1997. Detailed FY07 financial information is presented in Attaclunent A- Schedule 4. 3-3 Item 3 Meeting Date 12/18/2007 SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE This fee was adopted to provide the necessary financing to construct the Salt Creek Interceptor. This fee is applicable to the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, a portion of the Upper Otay Lake Basin north of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, Wolf Canyon Basin, and a portion of the Lower Otay Lake Basin east of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin. The fee for FY06 was $1,330 per EDU under Ordinance 2974-A dated August 17, 2004. Detailed FY07 financial information is presented in Attachment A - Schedule 4. OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 1, 5, & 6 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE This fee was adopted to provide the necessary financing to construct the facilities. The fee program was amended in February 2007 to include Otay Ranch Village 2. This action amended both the program's area of benefit and facility list. Construction costs were also revised and a new fee of $1,114 per EDU was established. This represents an increase of $331 as compared with the previous rate of $783 per EDU. Detailed FY07 financial information is presented in Attachment A - Schedule 5. OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 11 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE This fee was adopted to provide the necessary financing to construct four pedestrian bridges in Otay Ranch Village 11. This fee was increased from $1,808 to $1,865 per EDU in October of 2006. Detailed FY07 financial information is presented in Attachment A - Schedule 5. PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF The Public Facilities DIF is a citywide fee with several components levied to fund that portion of public facilities projects attributable to new development. The total fee for all components was increased in August 2006 from $5,489 to $7,890 per EDU. The same evening the fee increase was approved by Council, the closure of four minor program components was also approved. This action closed the following: . Microcomputer Systems Component; . Telecommunication Systems Component; . Records Management System Component; and . Geographic Information System Component. The closure of these components had no impact on development's overall PFDIF fee obligation. Detailed FY07 financial information is presented in Attachment A - Schedule 6. The active components of the Public Facilities DIF with the current fees are as follows: 3-4 Item 3 Meeting Date 12/18/2007 ADMINISTRATION ($526) - Administration of the Public Facilities DIF program, overseeing of expenditures and revenues collected, preparation of updates, calculation of costs, etc. CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION ($2,188) - Expansion of the Civic Center per the Civic Center Master Plan 1989 to provide sufficient building space and parking due to growth and development. The Civic Center Master Plan was updated in July 2001 to include the Otay Ranch impacts. POLICE FACILITY ($1,464) - Accommodation of the building space needs per the Civic Center Master Plan, which included the newly constructed police facility, upgrading of the communications center and installation of new communication consoles. Also included is the purchase and installation of a computer aided dispatch system (CAD), Police Records Management System, and Mobile Data Terminals. CORPORATION YARD RELOCATION ($393) - Relocation of the City's Public Works Center from the bay front area to the more centrally located site on Maxwell Road. LIBRARIES ($1,258) - Improvements include construction of the South Chula Vista library and Eastern Territories libraries, and installation of a new automated library system. This component is based on the updated Library Master Plan. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM ($1,106) - Projects include the relocation of Fire Stations #3 & #4, construction of a fIre training tower and classroom, purchase of a brush rig, installation of a radio communications tower and construction of various fIre stations in the Eastern section of the City. This fee also reflects the updated Fire Station Master Plan, which includes needs associated with the Otay Ranch development. MAJOR RECREATION FACILITIES ($955) - New component adopted in November 2002 to build major recreation facilities created by new development such as community centers, gymnasiums, swimming pools, and seniorlteen centers. Although the majority of project costs are to be borne by new development, it is important to note that various comRonents or specifIc projects within a component contain both a City and new development cost share. The City share often reflects "joint impetus" projects, which are necessitated by both growth and non-growth factors and/or the City's obligation to correct pre- existing space/equipment defIciencies. The PFDIF fees only relate to new development's cost share for each component. PARKLAND AOUlSITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD) FEES This in-lieu fee was adopted by the City to acquire neighborhood and community parkland and to 3-5 Item 3 Meeting Date 12/18/2007 construct parks and recreational facilities. The Parkland Acquisition and Development fee was increased in October 2006 from $8,962 to $9,122 for Areas West of I-80S and $16,644 to $16,804 for Areas East ofI-80S. Detailed FY07 financial information is presented on Attachment B. TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FEES This fee was established to pay all or part of the cost and expense to enlarge sewer facilities of the City so as to enhance efficiency of utilization and/or adequacy of sewer capacity. Detailed FY07 financial information is presented on Attachment C. FY07 FINANCIAL INFORMATION Attachment A, Schedules 1 through 5 reports the required financial information for all DIFs, other than the Public Facilities DIF. Attachment A, Schedule 6 reports the required financial information for the Public Facilities DIF and its components. Attachment B reports the required financial information for the PAD fees. Attachment C reports the required information for the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve fees. The schedules contain the following items: . The beginning balances as of July 1, 2006. . The fees received during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. . Other miscellaneous revenues received during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. . The interest earned from investing the cash balances available in each fund during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. . The expenditures from each of the funds during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. . A description of each capital project with expenditures funded entirely or in part by DIF /PAD/Trunk Sewer in FY07 and the percentage of the project funded by this fee through FY07. More detailed information on any project is available in the annual Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Budget. . Information on any loans from DIF/PAD/Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve funds during FY07. . The ending balances as of June 30, 2007 for each of the DIF/PAD/Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Funds. . The amount, description and purpose of the fee. . An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence. The ending balances as of June 30, 2007 are in the process of being audited as part of the audit of citywide financial statements, and are therefore subject to adjustment. FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR FUNDS IN POSSESSION OVER 5 YEARS 3-6 Item :'3 Meeting Date 12/18/2007 Government Code Section 66001(d) requires the local agency to make findings every five years with respect to any portion of the DIF fees remaining unexpended to identifY the purpose for which it was charged. This year the city has elected to make such [mdings for any funds remaining unexpended for five or more years. The following fee program has fees, which were collected five or more years ago, which remain unexpended and is listed to satisfY Section 66001(d) of the Government Code. a. Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Since its inception in 1988, the TDIF program identified the need for an interim SR-125 facility, and included such facilities as project numbers 1 and 2. In 1994, a separate Interim Pre-SR 125 Development Impact Fee (SR-125 DIF) was established to ensure that sufficient funds would be available to construct a north-south transportation corridor should the SR -125 freeway not be constructed in time to serve impending development. With financing secured, environmental constraints addressed and construction underway for SR-125, Council tolled the fee in April of 2004. At that time, Council also amended the Ordinance to allow transportation capacity enhancement improvements to be funded from fees already collected for the SR-125 DIP. In conjunction with the May 2005 comprehensive update of the TDIF program, Council approved the transfer of all remaining Interim SR-125 DIF funds to the TDIF fund for several capacity enhancing improvements, including overpasses of the SR-125 at Rock Mountain Road and Otay Valley Road. In total, $12.5 million was transferred between funds as a result of this action. Of this amount, $3.5 million has now been held in excess of five years, with, $1.7 million (along with any and all interest earned) still needed for these SR-125 related capacity enhancing improvements. The remaining $1.8 million in Interim SR-125 DIF funds held in excess of five years will be refunded to residents of Eastern Chula Vista who contributed to the SR-125 DIP via a toll reduction incentive program. On July 17,2007 Council approved this toll reduction program via Resolution 2007-182. $1.8 million was transferred to South Bay Expressway (SBX) on August 2007; SBX is charged with contacting eligible residents and informing them of their refund. Copies of this report were sent to the Building Industry Association of San Diego, the Eastlake Development Company, the McMillin Companies, the Otay Ranch Company, the Otay Land Company, Trimark Pacific Homes and Brookfield Homes. DECISION MAKER CONFLICTS Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found a conflict exists, in 3-7 Item '3 Meeting Date 12/18/2007 that Council Member McCann has property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. FISCAL IMPACT: With fmdings that identify the continued need for the unexpected and lor committed or uncommitted fees, the City retains the fees for future projects. Without findings that the unexpended funds are still needed for the projects, the City would be obligated to refund the $1.7 million in the TDIF funds plus interest accrued that have been held for five or more years pursuant to State Government Code Section 66000. The loss of the funds would jeopardize scheduled construction projects in FY08. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - Schedules I through 6: FY07 Financial Information for all DIFs including Public Facilities DIF Attachment B - FY07 Financiallnformation for PAD fees Attachment C - FY07 Financial Information for Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve fees 3-8 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 1 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF) FY 06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: To finance the construction of traffic and transportation improvements in support of future development. Amount of the Fee: $ 10,455 8,364 6,273 167,280 83,640 per single family equivalent dwelling unit detached per single family equivalent dwelling unit attached (med density) per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit per general commercial gross acre per industrial gross acre (.0) FY 04/05 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: I FUND 591 co TRANSPORTATION DIF Beginning Balance, 07/01/06 $ 25,344,282 TDIF Fees Collected 719,921 Transportation State Share Interest Earned 1,224,924 Miscellaneous Revenues Forgiveness of debt Transfer-In Expenditures: Supplies & Services (105,727) Other Expenses (903,021) Debt Payment - Calease Fiscal Sys Transfer-Out - 2003 Refunding COP (7,008) CIP Project Expenditures (456,252) Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/07 $ 25,817,119 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 1.1 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF) FY 06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 06/07 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT Total Appropriation Future % Of Project Initially PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/07 Appropriations Funded by TDIF Scheduled GG183 G IS-OrthophotographylT opog raph 20,375 42,500 25.37% 2003 STL261 Willow St Bridge Widening 34,506 1,087,740 48.94% 1999 caTM328 99 Orange Ave 1-805 Inter 45,458 4,953,678 16.88% 1999 ISTM331 98 E. Orange Extension 8,516 4,459,904 99.47% 1999 d;TM346 Interim SR-125 Facility Phase I 196,572 35.00% 2003 STM350 South Circulation Network 155,000 100.00% 2003 STM351 Main St Dual Left Turn Ln-180 2,214,117 100.00% 2002 STM355 Otay Lakes Road Widening, East H to Canyon 169,758 900,000 100.00% 2003 STM356 Ramp Widening on E. H St and 1-805 Northbound 8,794 3,333,240 98.74% 2004 STM357 Rock Mtn Rd - Heritage to La Media 232,000 91.23% 2004 STM363 OLR and Ea H St Pedestrian & Traffic Study 11,093 50,000 50.00% 2007 STM364 Heritage Road Bridge Reconstrc 5,932 1,820,000 52.00% 2007 TF274 Traffic Count Stations 9,441 210,000 100.00% 2002 TF312 Transportation Planning Program 69,016 400,000 100.00% 2003 TF329 Traffic Management Center 73,363 200,000 TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ 456,252 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: For City's traffic signal needs resulting from increased traffic volume caused by new development. Amount of the Fee: $ 27.70 per trip FY 04/05 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 225 TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUND Beginning Balance, 07/01/06 $ 4,013,456 (0) I ..... ..... Traffic Signal Fees Collected Federal Grant Interest Earned Miscellaneous Revenues Transfer-In Expenditures: Other Expenses Transfer Out CIP Project Expenditures 683,742 67,657 205,283 5,517 Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/07 (1,920) (8,562) (1,127,532) 3,837,641 $ ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 2.1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 06/07 CIP EXPENDITURES: FY 06/07 Total Appropriation Future % Of Project Funded Initially PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE as of 6/30/07 Appropriations by Traffic Signal DIF Scheduled GG184 Bonita Library Improvements 97,634 100,000 17.40% 2004 TF237 Traffic Signal Upgrade 766,999 100.00% 2002 c.:> TF263 Traffic Signal Interconnect 101,041 200,000 200,000 100.00% 2002 I TF279 Install Illuminated Street Signs 8,910 155,500 45.70% 1999 ...... N TF290 Central Control and Traffic Communication Links 15,359 150,000 24.19% 2000 TF295 Traffic Signal Detection Replacement 62,366 217,500 50,000 79.00% 2002 TF300 Traffic Signallnstl Hilltop I Oxford 875 220,000 230,000 100.00% 2003 TF301 Signal Installation -Otay Lakes Rd/Apache Dr. 105,473 100.00% 2002 TF310 Emergency Preemption-16 Intersection 121,493 450,000 100.00% 2003 TF311 Intersection Improvement-1st I H I & 2nd I H 14,689 301,660 90.00% 2003 TF314 Signallnstallation-E Palomar & Medical Center 175,000 100.00% 2004 TF315 Signal Installation-5th Ave & Moss St 181,340 100.00% 2004 TF316 Signal Installation-2nd & Quintard 1,777 150,000 100.00% 2003 TF317 Inters Impvt-Bonita Rd & Allen School Lane 93,707 181,351 100.00% 2004 TF318 Signal Installation-Fifth & Naples 16,067 198,660 100.00% 2004 TF319 Signal Modification Anita I Industrial 1,785 60,000 145,000 100.00% 2005 TF320 Signallnstl Greensgate IGreenvw 132,335 160,000 100.00% 2005 TF323 Upgrade Pedestrian Indications 50,990 165,000 100.00% 2005 TF324 Traffic Signal Installation-Naples & Oleander 14,563 180,000 100.00% 2005 TF328 Audible Pedestrian Signal Modifications 6,165 50,000 150,000 66.67% 2006 TF330 Traffic Modification 4th I Main & 4th I Beyer 29,060 260,000 367,000 100.00% 2006 TF331 Traffic Modification 3rd I Montgomery 1,261 220,000 150,000 100.00% 2006 TF333 Uninterruptible Power Supply Replacement 4,035 25,000 95,000 100.00% 2005 TF335 Traffic Signal Installation Brandywine & Sequoia 16,121 210,000 132,000 100.00% 2007 TF337 TF341 TF346 W I ~ w Traffic Left Turn Modification Program HES Improvements @ 4th Ave &k SI. Traffic Signal LED Replacement Program TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ 8,914 282,399 45,986 1,127,532 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 176,649 313,500 50,000 2006 2005 2007 W I ...... .j>. SCHEDULE 3 TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF (TC DRAINAGE DIF) FY 06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ATTACHMENT A Amount of the Fee: $ 4,579 per acre Description of Fee: For construction of Telegraph Canyon channel between Paseo Ladera and the Eastlake Business Center and for a portion of the channel west of 1-805. FY 06/07 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: Beginning Balance, 07/01/06 TC Drainage Fees Collected Interest Earned Transfer-In Expenditures: Debt Service Payment to 03 Refunding COP CIP Project Expenditures Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/07 FY 06/07 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT FY 06107 EXPENDITURE Total Appropriation as of 6/30/07 FUND 542 TC DRAINAGE DIF $ 5,294,610 537 259,976 (1,731) (14,375) $ 5,539,017 Future Appropriations % Of Project Funded by DIF Initially Scheduled DESCRIPTION DR118 94 Telegraph Canyon Channellmpvts DR131 97/Strm Flow-TelCynlPoggi 5,081 9,294 TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ 14,375 3,919,026 75,000 100.00% 75.56% 1994 1997 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 4 SEWER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer DIF (TC Gravity Sewer DIF) Fund 541 Pumped Sewer DIF (Pumped Sewer DIF) Fund 543 Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin DIF (PC Sewer Basin DIF) Fund 551 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF (SC Sewer Basin DIF) Fund 553 Description of Fee: Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer DIF: Pumped Sewer OIF: Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF: Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin DIF: For the expansion of trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties. For construction of facilities necessary to provide sewer service to developments within the pumped flow basin. For the planning, design, construction and/or financing of the facilities. For the construction of a trunk sewer in the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin from a proposed regional trunk sewer west of 1-805 along Olympic Parkway to the boundary of Eastlake. W I ~ Amount of the fee: (11 Fund 541 TC Gravity Sewer DIF Fund 543 Pumped Sewer DIF Fund 551 PC Sewer Basin DIF Fund 553 SC Sewer Basin DIF per single family equivalent dwelling unit detached per single family equivalent d\Yelling unit attached per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit per commercial gross acre (Fixture unit based) per industrial gross acre (Fixture unit based) $ 216.50 $ 216.50 162.38 216.50/edu 216.50/edu $ 400 400 300 3,572 3,572 $ 1330 1330 997.50 1,330 1,330 o o o o o SCHEDULE 4.1 SEWER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 06/07 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: Beginning Balance, 07/01/06 DIF Fees Collected Interest Earned Transfer-In Expenditures: Other Expenses Transfer Out CIP Project Expenditures c..> I ~ Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/07 a> FY 06/07 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Initially Scheduled Fund 541 - Telearaoh Canyon Sewer DIF SW224 Telegraph Cyn Sewer Impvmts TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES Fund 551- Pocci Canyon Sewer Basin DIF SW226 Upgrade-Reach 205 of Poggi Cyn Tnk Sew SW214 98/ Poggi Cyn Trunk Sewer TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES Fund 553 - Salt Creek Sewer Basin OIF SW225 Wolf Canyon Trunk Sewer Const SW219 99 Sit Crk Trunk Sew Construction SW245 Salt Creek Sewer Trnk Maintenance TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES Fund 541 TC Gravity Sewer DIF $ 901,651 $ 37,000 45,521 (13,291) Fund 543 Pumped Sewer DIF Fund 551 PC Sewer Basin DIF 45,171 $ 2,700,154 $ 2,880 (45,171) 235,695 100,363 (40,478) (710,409) (856) 2,880 $ 2,284,469 $ ATTACHMENT A Fund 553 SC Sewer Basin DIF 1,528,985 283,465 266,115 (64,111) (105,300) 1,909,154 $ 970,881 $ FY 06/07 Total Appropriation EXPENDITURE as of 6/30/07 $ 856 $ 856 104,271 1,029 $ 105,300 2,400,000 2,000,000 1,756,440 943,700 12,785,096 275,000 Future Appropriations % Of Project Funded by DIF 25.00% 100.00% 100.00% 96.42% 40.26% 40.26% 2001 2002 1999 2001 2000 2000 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 5 OTAY RANCH PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FY 06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Otay Ranch Village 1,5 & 6 Pedestrian Bridge DIF (OR Vii 1 & 5 Pedestrian Bridge DIF), Fund 587 Otay Ranch Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF (OR Vii 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF), Fund 588 Description of Fee: OR Village 1 & 5 Pedestrian Bridge DIF: To finance the construction of pedestrian bridge improvement between Otay Ranch Villages 1, 5 & 6. OR Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF: To finance the construction of pedestrian bridge improvement in Otay Ranch Village 11. Amount of the fee: (.0) I ~ Fund 587 OR Village 1, 5 & 6 Ped Bridge DIF Fund 588 OR Village 11 Ped Bridge DIF ...... per single family equivalent dwelling unit detache. $ per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit $ 1,114.00 $ 826.00 $ 1,865.00 1,385.00 FY 04/05 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 587 FUND 588 OTAY RANCH DIF OTAY RANCH DIF Beginning Balance, 07/01/06 $ 1,746,247 $ 1,407,375 262,696 78,208 78,953 (638,764 ) (326) 1,185,691 $ 1,748,698 DIF Fees Collected Interest Earned Expenditures - Other Expenses Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/07 $ SCHEDULE 6 PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (PFDIF) FY 06/07 STATEMENT OF FUND BALANCE Description of Fee and amount Admistration ($526) - Administration of the Public Facilities DIF program, overseeing of expenditures and revenues collected, preparation of updates, calculation of costs, etc. Civic Center Expansion ($2,188) - Expansion of the Civic Center per the Civic Center Master Plan 1989 to provide sufficient building space and parking due to growth and development. The Civic Center Master Plan was updated in July 2001 to include the Otay Ranch impacts. Police Facility ($1 ,464) - Accommodation of the building space needs per the Civic Center Master Plan, which included the newly constructed police facility, upgrading of the communications center and installation of new communication consoles. Also included is the purchase and installation of a computer aided dispatch system (CAD), Police Records Management System, and Mobile Data Terminals. Corporation Yard Relocation ($393) - Relocation of the City's Public Wor1<:s Center from the bay front area to the more centrally located site on Maxwell Road. Libraries ($1,258) - Improvements include construction of the South Chula Vista library and Eastern Territories libraries, and installation of a new automated library system. This component is based on the updated Library Master Plan. Fire Suppression System ($1,106) - Projects include the relocation of Fire Stations #3 & #4, construction of a fire training tower and classroom, purchase of a brush rig, installation of a radio communications tower and construction of various fire stations in the Eastern section of the City. This fee also reflects the updated Fire Station Master Plan, which includes needs associated with the Otay Ranch development. c.> I ~ Major Recreation Facilities ($955) - New component adopted in November 2002 to build major recreation facilities created by new development such as community centers, gymnasiums, swimming pools, and senior/teen centers. 00 Beginning Balance, 07101106 Revenues: DW Revenues Inveslment Earnings OlherRevenue Reimbursement - Oth AgenCies Transfer In Expenditures: Personnel Services Tolal Supplies & Services OUler Expenses Capital Expenditures CIP Project Expenditures TransferOul Police Corp Yard FlreSupp. Geographic Mainframe Telephone Records Roc. Gen. Admin Civic Cenler (1) Facility ReIocalioo libraries Syslem InfoSyslem Computer Syslem Mgt Facilities 571 5671572 573 57' 575 576 577 578 579 581 592 TOTAL $ (1,926,303) $ 20,173,481 $ 3,272,633 $ 5,692,811 $12,146,995 $(12,070,959) $(236,149) $ (74,026) $ 240,653 $(177,603) $(5,586,456) $ 21,454,875 265,581 453,904 376,747 197,487 244,932 327,560 1,727 1,308 1,060 1,658 258,597 2,130,561 (64,4B2) 988,182 136,017 278,897 360,803 (501,291) (4,063) (1,226) 4,098 (2,977) (203,099) 990,859 95,036 700,000 53,279 848,315 27,426 280,411 73,946 179,122 560,905 (B7B,3B9) (294,764) (542,464) (302,992) (9,741,309) (9,346,703) (245,611) Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/0 $ (2,276,369) $17,751,076 $ NOTE: 1,653,478 $ 4,683,101 $ 7,209,688 $(16,905,643) $ $ $ $ $(6,356,068) $ 5,757,243 (1) This fund includes the amount set aside for the acquisition of the Adamo property in Fund 567. FY 06/07 PFDIF CIP EXPENDITURES: Project GENERAL ADMINISTRATION - Fund 571 Description SCHEDULE 6.2 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF (PFDIF) FY 06/07 SCHEDULE OF DETAILED EXPENDITURES FY 06107 Expenditure Total Appropriation Future as of 6/30/07 Appropriations 196,128 GG179 City General Plan Update $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES-GENERAL ADMINISTRATION CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION - Fund 567/572 (,)GG139 I GG200 U;GG300 Civic Center Expansion Project Civic Center Expansion Project Phase II Civic Center Expansion Project Phase III 203,276 7,505,616 1,931,676 10,244,445 1,855,601 $ 2,058,877 PS149 POLICE FACILITIES REMODELING - Fund 573 TOTAL EXPENDITURES-CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION New Police Facility TOTAL EXPENDITURES-POLICE FACILITIES CORPORATION YARD RELOCATION - Fund 574 GG171 PW InfoSyslModernize/Expansion OP205 Purchase C&R Equipment 7,171,744 $ 319 237,754 40,000 $ 319 LB124 LIBRARIES - Fund 575 TOTAL EXPENDITURES-CORPORATION YARD East Side Library TOTAL EXPENDITURES - LIBRARIES 1,543,042 11,888,200 $ 1,543,042 1,337,031 % of Project Funded by PFDIF 19.77% 30.23% 11.17% 100.00% 11.59% 19.16% 100.00% 100.00% ATTACHMENT A Initially Scheduled 2002 1995 2006 2006 1999 2002 2005 2001 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 6.3 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF (PFDIF) FY 06/07 SCHEDULE OF DETAILED EXPENDITURES FY 06/07 PFDIF CIP EXPENDITURES: FY 06/07 Total Appropriation Future % of Project Funded Initially Project Description Expenditure as of 6/30/07 Appropriations by PFDIF Scheduled FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM - Fund 576 GG189 Emergency Operations Centers 2,832 31,340 20.59% 2005 PS126 99 Fire Station #8 2,633,816 99.91% 2002 PS128 Fire Station #8 5,170,152 7,051,913 100.00% 2002 PS150 Fire Station #7 Construction 7,743,366 99.81% 2001 PS158 Purchase of Fire Equipment 940,422 42.30% 2003 PS159 Fire Dispatch Center 45,772 585,000 25.92% 2004 c,.)PS162 Strategic Bus Plan Equipment 222,500 100.00% 2005 I ..., TOTAL EXPENDITURES-FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM $ 5,218,756 0 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS GG192 Permits Plus Enhancements 41,926 99,906 50.00% 2006 TOTAL EXPENDITURES-TELEPHONE SWITCH EXPANSION $ 41,926 RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - Fund 581 GG129 97 Records Mnmt - Citywide 224,715 53.88% 1997 GG174 Document Imaging - Citywide 69,540 32.03% 2000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES-RECORDS MANAGEMENT $ REC FACILITIES - Fund 582 PR238 Veterans Park 252,997 5,420,984 58.45% 2002 PR262 Parks Master Plan Update 38,284 152,840 100.00% 2005 PR265 Rec Facillties-Fixtures/Equipt 51,148 654,095 95.71% 2005 PR270 Montevalle Recreation Facility 331,144 6,235,889 100.00% 2005 PR271 Salt Creek Recreation Facility 204,354 6,134,696 100.00% 2005 PR293 Irrigation Booster Pump @ Veterans Park 462 3,921 100.00% 2007 TOTAL EXPENDITURES-REC FACILITIES $ 878,389 LOANS: c..:I I N ~ ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 6.4 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF (PFDIF) FY 06/07 SCHEDULE OF DETAILED EXPENDITURES Descriotion of Loan Loan Amount tnterest Rate Corporation Yard DIF loan to General Fund approved by Council Resolution 2000-077 for CIP project #GG158 Animai Shelter 913,418 6.56% ATTACHMENT B PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD FEES) FY 06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: In lieu fee for providing neighborhood community park and recreational facilities. Areas East of 1-805 Amount of the Fee: $ 16,804 per single family dwelling unit 12,471 per multi-family dwelling unit 7,864 per mobile home dwelling unit 7,190 per motel/hotel dwelling unit Areas West of 1-805 Amount of the Fee: $ 9,122 per single family dwelling unit 6,770 per multi-family dwelling unit 4,269 per mobile home dwelling unit 3,903 per motel/hotel dwelling unit (,) I N N FY 06/07 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 715 PAD FUND Beginning Balance, 07/01/06 $ 29,209,798 Revenues: Park Dedication Fees Interest Earned Transfer In from CIP fund Expenditures: Supplies and Services Other Expenses CIP Project Expenditures 7,980,398 1,658,279 (1,961,650) Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/07 $ 36,886,825 ATTACHMENT B1 PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD FEES) FY 06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 06/07 CIP EXPENDITURES: FY 06/07 Total Appropriation Future %OfPr~ectFunded Initially PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE at 6/30/07 Appropriations by PAD Fees Scheduled PR169 Greg Rogers Park Improvements 323,230 32.68% 1997 PR179 Gayle McCandliss Park 20,626 51,558 100.00% 2000 PR181 Rohr Park Improvements 721 137,000 60.04% 2000 PR214 97 Restrooms Renov - Otay, G Rogers 367,725 75.55% 1998 PR223 99 Parkway Pool Resurface 14,319 2.36% 1999 (0) PR228 Playground Equipment Renovation 733,099 31.89% 2000 I I'.:> PR238 Veterans Park 1,301 3,653,760 79.79% 2001 (0) PR239 Skate Park - Greg Rogers Park 158 0.01% 2002 PR250 Montevalle (RH) Community Park 950,838 8,553,168 94.60% 2003 PR251 Salt Creek (ELl Community Park 462,958 8,227,252 34.40% 2003 PR252 Rohr Park Lighting 0 136,420 100.00% 2003 PR257 Mountain Hawk 222,732 4,330,330 100.00% 2004 PR259 Heritage Park Skate Facility 40,000 100.00% 2004 PR260 San Miguel Ranch Community Park 185,403 840,386 100.00% 2007 PR262 Parks Master Plan Update 19,099 50,000 24.60% 2005 PR265 Rec Facilities-Fixtures/Equipmnt 30,000 4.36% 2005 PR279 All Seasons park 62,684 449,459 100.00% 2007 PR293 Irrigation Booster Pump @ Veterans Park 35,288 35,289 90.00% 2007 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,961,650 Note: The ending balance includes fees paid by specific developers for specific parks within those development. These parks include Salt Creek Park, Montevalle Park, Mt. Miguel Park, Mountain Hawk, and the Otay Ranch Community Park. TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FY06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: For the enlargement of sewer facilities of the City so as to enhance efficiency of utilization andlor adequacy of capacity and for planning andlor evaluating any future proposals for area wide sewage treatment and or water reclamation systems or facilities. Amount of the Fee: $ 45 Administrative fee per connection 6,990 plus $174.73/11 of chargeable length in excess of 35 II for construction of a 4" diameter lateral 7,107.95 plus $178.10/11 of chargeable length in excess of 35 II for construction of a 6" diameter lateral 528 for 4" diameter tap-ins 607 for 6" diameter tap-ins 1,350 for chargeable length in excess of 35 II for connections made at a depth in excess of nine feet 3,478 per equivalent dwelling unit of flow when developing or modifying use of any residential property W I N .j:> FY 06107 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 293 TRUNK SEWER (TS) Beginning Balance, 07101/06 $ 25,793,160 Interest Earned Sewerage Facility Participant Fees Transfer In Expenditures: Transfer Out To Sewer Service Rev. Fund CIP Project Expenditures 751,851 3,762,404 755,579 (651,367) Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30107 $ 30,411,627 ATTACHMENT C ATTACHMENT C.1 TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FY06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 05/06 EXPENDITURES: FY 06/07 Total Approp. Future oloOfPr~ectFunded Intially PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE at 6/30/07 Appropriations by TRUNK SEWER Scheduled GG171 PW Info System Modern Expansion 4,483 11,085 0.90% 1999 OP202 CI P Advanced Planning 25,000 25,000 4.80% 2005 SW205 Metro Sewer System Upgrade 1,150 468,010 100.00% 1992 SW219 Salt Creek Trunk Sewer 305,564 19,332,324 59.80% 1999 w SW223 Wastewater Master Plan 58,305 685,000 100.00% 2001 I SW224 Telegraph Canyon Sewer Impvnt 2,200,000 75.00% 2000 ..., tn SW225 Wolf Canyon Trunk Sewer 35,000 3.58% 2000 SW232 Poggi Canyon Ex1-Eastlake Pkwy 1,163 1,230,000 100.00% 2004 SW233 Moss Street Woodlawn to Broadway 123,652 408,650 25.70% 2007 SW234 Sewer Improvement Colorado J & K 1,253 349,600 100.00% 2004 SW235 Main Sl. Sewer Hilltop - Fresno 30,467 102,000 77.30% 2004 SW236 Center Sl. Imp Garret & Fourth 46,877 210,848 100.00% 2005 SW242 Inflow and infiltration Study 30,856 75,000 100.00% 2006 SW243 Tel. Cyn Trunk Swr Imp. Bay Blvd & J 1,696 306,000 100.00% 2006 SW249 Joint Feas Stud for Wastewater Reclm 20,901 70,000 100.00% 2007 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 651,367 TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FY06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES LOANS: Description of Loan Loan Amount Loan to Oxford SI. AD97-1 Improvement Fund, approved by Council Resolution #18795 on October 28, 1997 15,723 Loan to Twin Oaks Ave AD96-1, approved by Council Resolution #18873 on January 20, 1998 16,748 w I N m Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #18996 on May 19, 1998 544,046 Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #19078 on July 16, 1999 for project DR140 (Storm Drain Repair-Orange) 52,744 Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #19607 on Nov. 24,1999 for project DR 147 (CMP Storm Drain Replacement) 203,837 Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #19682 on Jan. 19,2000 72,623 Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved by Council Resolution #2001-203 on June 19,2001 10,481,889 Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved by Council Resolution #2002-222 on June 18,2002 1,686,404 ATTACHMENT C.2 Interest Rate 7.00% 7.00% 6.07% 5.90% 5.88% 5.88% 5.88% 5.34% (0) I N -.J LOANS: TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FY06/07 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved by Council Resolution #2002-297 on August 13, 2002 2,738,084 Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DI F approved by Council Resolution #2003-278 on June 17, 2003 1,049,651 Total $ 16,861,747 ATTACHMENT C.3 1.90% 1.50% RESOLUTION NO. 2007- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FINDING THAT THE UNEXPENDED FUNDS IN THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (TDIF) FUND ARE STILL NEEDED TO PROVIDE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES FOR WHICH THE FEES WERE COLLECTED WHEREAS, California Government Code section 66001(d) requires local agencies to make findings every five years with respect to any portion of the Development Impact Fees (DIFs) remaining unexpended to identify the purpose for which it was charged; and WHEREAS, the City has identified unexpended fees that were on deposit for five of more years and has elected to make the required findings; and WHEREAS, the Transportation Development Impact Fee ("TDIF") program has fees, which were collected five or more years ago, which remain unexpended and are listed to satisfy section 66001(d) of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, in May 2005, Council approved the transfer of all remaining funds in the Interim SR-125 DIF to the TDIF fund for several capacity enhancing improvements, including overpasses of the SR-125 at Rock Mountain Road and Otay Valley Road; and WHEREAS, $12.5 million was transferred between funds as a result of this action; and WHEREAS, of the $12.5 million, $3.5 million has now been held in excess of five years, with $1.7 million (along with any and all interest earned) still needed for these SR-125-related capacity enhancing improvements; and WHEREAS, the remaining $1.8 million in Interim SR-125 DIF funds held in excess of five years have been transferred to South Bay Expressway in August 2007, to be refunded to residents of Eastern Chula Vista who contributed to the SR-125 DIF via a toll reduction incentive program; WHEREAS, on July 17, 2007, the City Council approved this toll reduction program via Resolution 2007-182. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista ("City Council") does hereby find that the unexpended funds in The Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) fund are still needed to provide for construction of facilities for which the fees were collected; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council makes the following findings: 1. The $1.7 million (along with any and all interest earned) remaining in the TDIF will be used for SR-125-related capacity enhancing improvements; and J:\AlLOmcy\RESO\TDIF\UNEXPENDED FUNDS rN TDlF _12.IS.07-RESQ.doc 3-28 Resolution No. 2007- Page 2 2. The TDIF charged was reasonably related to the purpose for which it was charged, in that, the fee was imposed on development within the Eastern Territories of Chula Vista, and the funds were used and are being used to construct SR-125, and enhance its capacity, to service that development; and 3. The TDIF fee was the only source of funding for the SR-125 and its improvements; other than the $1.7 million remaining in the TDIF fund, and interest to be earned on those funds, there is no additional funding necessary to complete the SR-125 improvements; and 4. All Transportation Development Impact Fees for the SR-125 improvements have been deposited into the TDIF fund. Presented by Approved as to form by Jack Griffin Director of General Services '-~\~ (b 1--) oore r' 1\ttorney J:\Atlomey\RESO\TDlF\UNEXPENDED FUNDS IN TDIF _12-IS.07-RESQ.doc 3-29