HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/11/13 Item 4
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
~\~ CITY OF
J~CHULA VISTA
11/13/07, Item~
SUBMITTED BY:
RESOLUTION REJECTING BIDS FOR OTAY PARK
RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION (CIP NO. PR-277) AND
DIRECTING STAFF TO RE-ADVERTISE THE PROJECT
AND GENERAL SERVICE~~ .
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
CITY MANAGER
ASSISTANTCIT MANAGER =;.j
4/5THS VOTE: YES 0 NO ~
BACKGROUND
On August 22, 2007 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Engineering and General Services received six
(6) sealed bids for the "Otay Park Recreation Center Expansion (CIP No. PR-277)" project. Due
to the contractors being non-responsive and with advice from the City Attorney's Office, staff
recommends all bids be rej ected and the proj ect be re-advertised for new bids.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies
for a Class I Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the State
CEQA Guidelines because the proposed project consists of minor alterations to an existing
public facility involving no expansion of the facility's current use. Thus, no further
environmental review is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Council adopt resolution rejecting bids for Otay Park Recreation Center Expansion (CIP No. PR-
277) and directing staff to re-advertise the project.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
On Wednesday, August 22,2007 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Engineering and General Services
received six (6) sealed bids for the "Otay Park Recreation Center Expansion (CIP No. PR-277)"
project. Strict adherence to the contract administration guidelines established by the State of
California and by the Federal Community Block Grant programs is required to avoid potential
loss of future funding. Upon close examination of the bid documents from all bids received,
and with advice from the City Attorney's Office, several errors by the contractors cause the
4-1
11/13/07 Item-L
Page 2 of3
received bids to be non-responsive. Staff recommends that Council reject all bids and direct staff
to re-advertise the project. Once staff re-advertises the project, a mandatory pre-bid meeting will
be held one week prior to the actual deadline for bid submittals. At the pre-bid meeting, staff
will conduct a "question and answer" session with any interested prospective bidders to assist
them in understanding the documents required for Community Block Grant projects and better
assure we receive responsive bids.
PROJECT BID RESULTS
The City of Chula Vista's Engineering and General Services Department prepared the plans,
contract documents and technical specifications for the "Otay Park Recreation Center Expansion
(CIP No. PR-277)" CIP project. City staff also prepared and advertised the project for bidding.
Staff received and opened bids on Wednesday, August 22, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. The lowest
responsive bidder for the project was based on the contractor who submitted all required
documents detailed in the contract documents and who submitted the lowest base bid for the
project construction. None of the contractors submitted all required documents detailed in the
contract documents. Bids from the six (6) contractors were received as follows (Bids sorted by
the base bid amount):
CONTRACTOR BASE BID
I. Fordyce Construction - Santee, CA $391,754.00
2. M. A. Stevens Company - National City, CA $393,000.00
3. APC Inc. - ImperiaIBeach, CA $394,900.00
4. HAR Construction - Chula Vista, CA $438,831.00
5. Healey Construction - National City, CA $466,882.00
6. Randell Construction - San Diego, CA $549,000.00
The low bid from Fordyce is above the Engineer's estimated range of $220,000.00 to
$250,000.00 by $141,754.00 or approximately 43.0%. The Engineer's estimate was prepared by
the City's architectural consultant and was based on average unit prices for similar types of work
completed recently. City Staff will incorporate the unit price bid results received into a database
for future project cost estimates.
Staffrecommends rejecting bids due to the contractors being non-responsive.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings
within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action.
4-2
11/13/07 Item-A:-
Page 3 of 3
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund. The funds for these improvements have been provided
from the Southwest Town Center Redevelopment Fund, Community Block Grant, and State
Recreation Grants. Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require only routine
City building maintenance.
PROJECT BUDGET FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. State Recreation Grants $80,000.00
B. Community Block Grant $220,000.00
C. Southwest Town Center Redevelopment Fund $300,000.00
TOTAL BUDGET FOR CONSTRUCTION $600,000.00
Prepared by: Don Brown, Sr. Project Supervisor, Engineering and General Services Department
M:\General Services\GS Administration\Council Agenda\Otay Rec Center Expansion (PR277)\PR277 Reject August 2007.10192007.PGS.doc
4-3
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE REJECTION OF BIDS
FOR OTAY PARK RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION
PROJECT (CIP NO. PR-277) AND DIRECTING STAFF TO RE-
ADVERTISE THE PROJECT.
WHEREAS, City staff prepared the plans, contract documents and technical
speci fications for the Otay Park Recreation Center Expansion Project (CIP No. PR-277); and
WHEREAS, on Wednesday, August 22, 2007 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of General
Services received six (6) sealed bids as follows:
CONTRACTOR BASE BID
l. Fordyce Construction - Santee, CA $391,754.00
7 M. A. Stevens Company - National City, CA $393,000.00
0 APC Inc. - Imperial Beach, CA $394,900.00
-'.
4. HAR Construction - Chula Vista, CA $438,831.00
5. Healey Construction - National City, CA $466,882.00
6. Randell Construction - San Diego, CA $549,000.00
and:
WHEREAS, the City must strictly adhere to the contract administration guidelines
established by the State of Califomia and by the Federal Community Block Grant programs to
avoid potential loss of future funding; and
WHEREAS, staff has closely examined the bid documents from all bids received and
noticed several errors by the contractors that cause the bids to be non-responsive; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the City Council reject all bids and direct staff to re-
advertise the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
that it authorizes the rejection of all bids received on August 22, 2007 for the Otay Park
Recreation Center Expansion Project (CIP No. PR277) and directs staff to re-advertise the
project.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Jack Griffin
Director of Engineering and General Services
L/L~ 0 /;~~ fr'-
Ann Moore
City Attomey
II:[N( ilNEER\RES()S',Resos2007\11-\ 3-07\PR277 RCS(l revisc:u by eC.dm:
4-4