The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007/11/13 Agenda Packet 1...lIIIdIr penalty of perjury that I am I r I I jut Ilr III CIty of Chula VIlla In the ... II III CIty Cleric 8IId that IIIORId this rl. IIUlllon the bu........ board ~I~ ~ IJ:. .....rl1""r.... ,j, ::~ .1J -ti L,j'1i.~ 1-1J7 SIGNED va ' _.~~~~ ClIT OF CHULA VISTA /1JeIt Cheryl Cox, Mayor Rudy Ramirez, Councilmember David R. Garcia, City Manager John McCann, Councilmember Ann Moore, City Attorney Jerry R. Rindone, Council member Susan Bigelow, City Clerk Steve Castaneda, Councilmember November 13, 2007 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers City Hall 276 Fourth Avenue CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, Rindone, and Mayor Cox PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE CONSENT CALENDAR (Items I through 6) The Council will enact the Consent Calendar staff recommendations by one motion, without discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or City staff requests that an item be removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed immediately following the Consent Calendar. 1. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter of resignation from Manny Ramirez, member of the International Friendship Commission effective November 16, 2007. Staff recommendation: Council accept the resignation and direct the City Clerk to post the vacancy in accordance with Maddy Act requirements. 2. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 2.52 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) Adoption of the ordinance incorporates changes requested by the Council, which include revisions to correct prior ambiguities and clarify the intent of the ordinance. The ordinance was first introduced on November 6, 2007. (City Attorney) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the ordinance. 3. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING INFORMAL BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE (LB- 139) CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY FLOORING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT TO VILLAGE CARPETS Adoption of the resolution accepts the informal bids and awards a contract for the Civic Center Library improvements to Village Carpets. (Engineering and General Services Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 4. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REJECTING BIDS FOR OTAY PARK RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION (CIP NO. PR-277) AND DIRECTING STAFF TO RE-ADVERTISE THE PROJECT On August 22, 2007, the Engineering and General Services Director received six (6) sealed bids for the project. Due to the contractors being non-responsive and with advise from the City Attorney's Office, staff recommends all bids be rejected and the project be re-advertised for new bids. (Engineering and General Services Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 5. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE "TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS NAPLES STREET BY HARBORSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (TF-347)" PROJECT TO LEKOS ELECTRIC, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,640, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF ALL AVAILABLE FUNDS IN THE PROJECT On September 26, 2007, the City Engineer received sealed bids for the project. The work proposed, aims to improve pedestrian safety at the mid-block crossing in front of Harborside Elementary and at the trolley track crossing west of the school, as well as slow down traffic traveling along Naples Street. (Engineering and General Services Director). Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. Page 2 - Council Agenda http://www.chulavistaca.gov November 13,2007 6.A. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING CHAPTER 15.06, ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL BUILDING CODES, TO THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE (FIRST READING) B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 2007 EDITION (FIRST READING) C. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.10 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE, 2007 EDITION (FIRST READING) D. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 2007 EDITION (FIRST READING) E. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.24 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, 2007 EDITION (FIRST READING) F. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.28 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2007 EDITION (FIRST READING) G. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.36 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, 2007 EDITION (FIRST READING) The State mandated local jurisdictions to start enforcing the various 2007 Editions of the California building codes on January 1,2008. Local adoption is a routine action taken by the City to incorporate local amendments. The ordinances adopt the various 2007 Editions of the California building codes, their administrative provisions and local amendments. (Planning and Building Director) Staff recommendation: Council hold first reading of the ordinances. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Council on any subject matter within the Council's jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Council may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes. Page 3 - Council Agenda htto:/ /www.chulavistaca.gov November 13, 2007 PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. 7. CONSIDERATION OF BA YVISTA (COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL) PROJECT WALK MIXED-USE Olson Urban Housing, LLC (Applicant) has submitted applications requesting a zone change, precise plan, conditional use permit, design review, and a tentative map for development of a mixed-use project with 154 residential units and 5,000 to 10,000 square feet of commercial uses on a 4.89-acre site located at 765-795 Palomar Street, between Industrial Boulevard and Frontage Road in Southwest Chula Vista. The site has been vacant for several years and was used as a temporary site for the sale of pumpkins and Christmas Trees. (Planning and Building Director) Staff recommendation: Council cancel the public hearing. ACTION ITEMS The Item listed in this section of the agenda will be considered individually by the Council, and is expected to elicit discussion and deliberation. If you wish to speak on the item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. 8. CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL OF THE DOWNTOWN PARKING STUDY FINAL REPORT AND INTERIM ACTION PLAN AND ESTABLISHING NEW PARKING METER RATES AND AN OVERTIME PARKING FINE RATE Staff will present the significant findings and recommendations for improvements to the Downtown Parking District and the proposed Parking District Interim Action Plan. (Redevelopment Agency Executive Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the following resolution, and place the ordinance on first reading: A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY; APPROVING THE DOWNTOWN PARKING INTERIM ACTION PLAN; AND DIRECTING STAFF TO PREPARE A DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTERS 10.56 AND 10.62 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATED TO PARKING METER RATES AND OVERTIME PARKING FINES (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) (FIRST READING) Page 4 - Council Agenda http://www .ch ulavistaca. gOV November 13,2007 OTHER BUSINESS 9. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS 10. MAYOR'S REPORTS II. COUNCIL COMMENTS CLOSED SESSION Announcements of actions taken in Closed Session shall be made available by noon on Wednesday following the Council Meeting at the City Attorney's office in accordance with the Ralph M Brown Act (Government Code 54957. 7). 12. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 . Agency designated representatives: Management Team . Employee organizations: CVEA, IAFF, POA, WCE, and Unrepresented Groups 13. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(b) . two cases 14. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(c) . one case 15. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) Christian Morales v. City of Chula Vista, et al. United States District Court, Case No. 07CVOl86JM (WMc); Concerned Citizens ofChula Vista v. Kimco Realtv. et al. San Diego Superior Court Case No. GIC 862773; Jack Gechter v. City ofChula Vista, San Diego Superior Court Case No. GIS22609 ADJOURNMENT to the Regular Meeting of November 20, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Page 5 - Council Agenda htto://VvwW .ch ulavistaca.llOV November 13, 2007 In compliance with the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service request such accommodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and five days for scheduled services and activities. Please contact the City Clerk for specific information at (619) 691-5041 or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDD) at (619) 585-5655. California Relay Service is also available for the hearing impaired. Page 6 - Council Agenda htto:! /www.chulavistaca.gov November 13,2007 Dear IFC Chairman Aya, Fellow Commissioners , It has been an honor and a privilege to be on the Chula Vista Int'l Friendship Commission (IFC) . And especially to be associated with a diverse group of dedicated volunteer residents. I thanks the City of Chula Vista for my appointment on this commission last year. However, it's my regret to announce my resignation from the Chula Vista Int'l Friendship ~~~~ . This is due to my plan to settled in Cebu, Philippines for at least two years. I hope my presence there will be useful to the relationship between Chula Vista and Cebu City. Though my departure for the Philippines is on December30, 2007, My wife and I will be on the road during the month of December so I suggest my resignation take effect Nov. 16. First please allow me to tell you why I joined the IFC in the first place. Since I moved in Chula Vista in 1995, I have been involved in our community in many ways. I had the opportunity to be at the 2001 and 2003 visits by a delegation from Cebu City. I also observed with admiration how the local Friends of Odawara, the City through the IFC and the City of Odawara,Japan conduct itself in sustaining its Sister City relations. In 2004, I visited Cebu once again and I really paid attention to the city and to its residents. I saw how the City of Cebu handled a city wide emergency situation. Those probably planted the seed that I should support its sister city relationship with Chula Vista, Upon my return I started getting involved with the IFC activities. In 2006, another opportunity came up during my visit in Cebu with a San Diego Medical Mission team. This time I saw the opportunity of giving back to my mother country, not just in Cebu. I believe that I can expect success if I live there myself while maintaining ties with my friends and the City of Chula Vista. This coming phase in my life will be exciting... One thing for sure I will take with me the spirit of Volunteerism that the United States of America is predicated upon. To close, please allow me to share the poem by Cliff Robertson, a pilot but well known as a Academy Award winning actor. Vo/unteerism is humanism in its most compassionate fonn Volunteerism - is the best of every religion It is an extended hand to a voiceless plea A sun on the best of days A lighted candle on the darkest night A selfless spirit - in a selfish world It is that small voice that whispers from our healt - reminding us that we all share this small Blue Marble for SO little time That to give it meaning, we must share our /ove Thank you, Manny Ramirez I FC Commissioner rf.\O~ ORDINANCE NO. ~~ !'PO ---n~\~(?) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ~.J.J;~~''CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 2.5~Y"tHE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista, pursuant to the police powers delegated to it by the California Constitution and as a charter city, has the authority to enact laws that promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its residents; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofChula Vista has the authority to regulate aspects of campaign finance and control related to the election of City officials, which is a matter of the general welfare of Chula Vista residents; and WHEREAS, Charter Section 904 provides that it is the policy of the City to avoid the potential for undue or improper influence over elected officials resulting from excessive campaign contributions. In furtherance of that purpose, the City Council shall adopt reasonable regulations related to campaign contributions which shall be contained in the City Code; and WHEREAS, in 2004, the City Council amended the Chula Vista Municipal Code to add a revised Chapter 2.52 regarding campaign contributions; and WHEREAS, the 2004 amendment was the result of a process started in November 2001 at the request of the City Council to review a model ordinance prepared by the San Diego Election Campaign Finance and Control Commission and use it as a tool to draft a new campaign contribution ordinance to meet the needs of Chula Vista; and WHEREAS, the 2004 ordinance was prepared and reviewed by an Ad Hoc Committee, which included a member ofthe Charter Review Commission, the Ethics 2-1 Ordinance No. Commission, an existing Councilmember, and a former Councilmember, prior to the ordinance's approval by the City Council; and WHEREAS, in 2007, it was brought to the City Council's attention that the revised 2004 campaign ordinance had areas of ambiguity that needed review and possible revision; and WHEREAS, the 2004 ordinance had been in place for two elections, the general election of June 2006 and the special election in November 2006; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2007, the City Council voted to form an Ad Hoc Committee on the Campaign Contribution Ordinance to review the existing law and ensure it is meeting the needs of the people of Chula Vista and to bring forward suggestions regarding proposed changes as needed; and WHEREAS, the City Council requested that the Ad Hoc Committee be composed of a member of the City's Charter Review Commission and Board of Ethics, and a member who sat on the City's previous committee on campaign finance, which was formed in June 2003; and WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Committee met several time in noticed public meetings during the Summer of 2007 to discuss the existing campaign contribution ordinance; and WHEREAS, on August 14,2007, the City Council directed the City Attorney to return to Council with a report outlining the ambiguities with the existing campaign contribution ordinance and proposing language to clarify these ambiguities without making any substantive changes to the existing ordinance or adding any new concepts; and 2-2 Ordinance No. WHEREAS, the City Attorney's Office prepared its report by reviewing the language of the existing ordinance, on its face, meaning the actual words used, and as it has been applied to issues raised during the general election in June 2006 and the special election in November 2006; gathering information from the City Clerk on questions raised during the 2006 election cycle; considering the discussions of the Ad Hoc Committee; and responding to the City Council's direction to the City Attorney in August 2007; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City Attorney's Office presented its report to the City Council, and the City Council voted to approve several policy changes to the existing ordinance; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City Council directed the City Attorney's Office to incorporate its requested changes to the existing ordinance and to prepare an ordinance with the changes for Council's review; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City Council further directed the City Attorney's Office to present the revised draft ordinance to the Ad Hoc Committee, which met on October 10, 2007 and October 16, 2007; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney's Office comes now to the City Council with the revised draft ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council ofthe City ofChula Vista does hereby ordain: SECTION I: The Chula Vista Municipal Code is amended to add a revised Chapter 2.52, entitled "Campaign Contributions," to read as follows: 2-3 Ordinance No. 2.52.010 Purpose and intent. In enacting this chapter, the City Council finds and declares that moderate monetary contributions to political campaigns are a legitimate form of participation in the American political process. It is the policy of this City to protect the integrity of the electoral process, and the best interests of the citizens of this City are served by regulating campaign [mance. Inherent in the high cost of election campaigning is the problem of improper influence, real or potential, exercised by campaign contributors over elected officials. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council in enacting this chapter: A. To preserve an orderly political forum in which individuals may express themselves effectively; B. To place realistic and enforceable limits on the amounts of money that may be contributed to political campaigns in City elections; C. To prohibit contributions by organizations and permit contributions by individuals only; D. To provide full and fair enforcement of all the provisions of this chapter; and E. To encourage candidate adherence to election regulations by making them easierto understand. 2.52.020 Interpretation of this chapter. A. The terms and phrases in this chapter shall be defined as those terms and phrases are defined in the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended (Government Code 2-4 Ordinance No. section 81000 et seq.) and in regulations adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission unless otherwise specified in this chapter. B. The terms of this chapter are applicable to any contributions made to a candidate or candidate-controlled committee, whether used by the candidate to [mance a current campaign or to pay debts incurred in prior campaigns. C. Revisions to this chapter take effect on December 13,2007, and are applicable to all contributions received by candidates seeking City elective office in the general election of June 2008 and any election thereafter. Any candidate for City elective office participating in the general election of June 2008 shall have a grace period of 60 days from the effective date, as stated in this paragraph, to repay any campaign contributions made or received prior to the effective date of the revisions in conflict with or in violation of any provisions of this chapter. A candidate repaying any campaign contributions or loans during this 60-day grace period shall provide written notice to the City Clerk of the repayment within three business days, defined as Monday through Friday and excluding City holidays, of the repayment. 2.52.030 Definitions. A. "Agent" means a person who acts on behalf or at the behest of any other person or accepts a contribution on behalf of a candidate. If an individual acting as an agent is also acting as an employee or member of a law, architectural, engineering or consulting firm, or a similar entity or corporation, both the entity or corporation and the individual are "agents." 2-5 Ordinance No. B. "At the behest" means made under the control or at the direction of, in cooperation, consultation, coordination, or concert with, at the request or suggestion of, or with the express prior consent of. C. "Campaign contribution account" is that account in which all contributions or loans made to the candidate shall be deposited, as required by Government Code section 8520l. D. "Candidate" means any individual seeking any City elective office, the candidate's campaign committee, committee(s) controlled by the candidate, agents of the candidate. E. "City campaign statement" means the statement which, to the extent practicable, shall be similar to or consolidated with that required by state law. F. "City elective office" means the offices held by the Mayor or members of the City Council. The "same City elective office," as used herein, means the specific Council seat numbered one (I), two (2), three (3), or four (4) or the specific seat held by the Mayor, as defined by Charter Section 300(C). G. "Contribution" is defined in a manner identical with the defmition found in Government Code section 82015, contained within the Political Reform Act, and any related provisions in the California Code of Regulations. H. "Enforcement authority," under this chapter, means that special counsel appointed by the City Attorney pursuant to CVMC 2.52.140. 1. "General election" is that election identified by Charter Section 900, which is combined with the state primary election. 2-6 Ordinance No. 1. "Independent expenditure committee" is as defined in the Political Reform Act, which supports or opposes in whole or in part a candidate for city elective office if contributions are made to said committee with the intent that they, or a comparable amount of funds otherwise owned by, or under the control of, the committee be used to support or oppose a particular candidate for a city elective office. This type of committee is not controlled by the candidate. K. "Organization" means a proprietorship, labor union, firm, partnership, joint venture, syndicate, business, trust, company, corporation, association, or committee, including a political action committee. L. "Person" means a natural individual. M. "Political Reform Act" means the California Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended, found at Govemment Code section 81000 et seq., and includes regulations adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission. N. "Single election contest" means either a general or special election. O. "Special election" defined in Charter Section 901, as all other municipal elections that may be held by authority of the Charter or of any law. 2.52.040 Campaign contribution limits. A. No person, other than a candidate, shall make a contribution in excess of $300.00 to a candidate for a single election contest. No candidate shall solicit or accept a contribution in excess of $300.00 from a contributor for a single election contest. A candidate may receive up to $300.00 from a contributor in each of the general and special elections. 2-7 Ordinance No. B. No organization shall make a contribution to any candidate or candidate- controlled campaign committee. This chapter shall not apply to contributions made to a committee, which is organized solely for the purpose of supporting or opposing the qualification for the ballot or adoption of one or more city measures. All contributions made by a person whose contribution activity is financed, maintained or controlled by an organization or any other person shall be deemed to be made by that organization or other person. If the contribution is deemed made by an organization, it is prohibited. C. No individual, or combination of individuals acting jointly, shall make directly or indirectly a contribution in the name of another individual or combination of individuals. D. Contributions by a husband and wife shall be treated as separate contributions and shall not be aggregated where the checks are drawn separately and signed by the spouse making the contribution. Contributions by a husband and wife shall be treated as separate even if combined into one check but presented with two signatures. E. No person shall make a contribution to any candidate, and no such candidate shall accept from any person such a contribution earlier than eleven months preceding a single election contest. F. A contribution for an election may be accepted by a candidate after the date of the election only to the extent that the contribution does not exceed net debts outstanding from the election, and the contribution does not otherwise exceed the applicable contribution limit for that election. 2-8 Ordinance No. G. A candidate may not solicit or accept contributions for a special election prior to the holding of the general election for that office. H. A candidate may carry over contributions raised in connection with one election for City elective office to pay campaign expenditures incurred in connection with a subsequent election for the same City elective office. 2.52.050 Loans A. A candidate shall not personally loan to his or her campaign funds, with the intent to receive repayment of those funds, in an aggregate amount in excess of $5,000 for a single election contest. B. A loan or extension of credit shall be considered a contribution from the maker of the loan or extender of credit and shall be subject to the contribution limit of $300.00 per person, pursuant to CVMC 2.52.040. The $300.00 contribution limit does not apply to loans made to a candidate for the purpose of a campaign by himself or herself or by a commercial lending institution in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the general public for which the candidate is personally liable. 2.52.060 Notice regarding personal funds. If a candidate spends or contributes personal funds of more than $5,000 aggregate, in connection with a campaign for a single election contest, a candidate shall do all of the following: A. Prior to spending or ,contributing the personal funds, the candidate shall provide written notice of the candidate's intent to spend or contribute more than $5,000 2-9 Ordinance No. of personal funds to the City Clerk and all opponent candidates. The notice shall be delivered personally or sent by registered mail to the last known address of the opponent candidates as shown in the records of the City Clerk and shall specify the amount of personal funds intended to be expended or contributed. The notice shall also provide the date the personal funds shall be deposited into the candidate's campaign contribution account, as required by CVMC 2.52.070(B). Separate notice is also required for every separate deposit of personal funds of any amount that is a contribution from a candidate to his or her campaign, once the candidate has spent or contributed more than $5,000 in personal funds in connection with the campaign for a single election contest. B. The required notice shall be given no later than 21 days prior the election, unless the expenditure or contribution occurs during the 21 days preceding the election, in which case the required notice shall be provided 24 hours prior to deposit into the candidate's campaign contribution account. 2.52.070 A. Campaign contribution account. The campaign contribution account required by Government Code section 85201(a) shall be established at a fmancial institution located in San Diego County. B. All personal funds to be expended or contributed by a candidate, including all loans of personal funds, shall first be deposited in the candidate's campaign contribution account. 2.52.080 Surplus campaign funds. A. Upon leaving any elected office, or at the end of the post-election reporting period following the defeat of a candidate for elective office, whichever occurs 2-10 Ordinance No. last, campaign funds under the control of a candidate shall be considered surplus campaign funds. B. Surplus campaign funds shall be used only for the following purposes: I. To repay contributions, including loans to oneself up to an amount of$5,000. 2. To make a donation to any bona fide charitable, educational, civic, religious, or nonprofit organization, where no substantial part of the proceeds will have a material financial effect on the candidate, any member of his or her immediate family, or his or her campaign treasurer. 3. To pay for professional services reasonably required by the candidate or candidate-controlled committee to assist in the performance of its administrative functions, including payment for attorney's fees for litigation that arises directly out of a candidate's activities or his or her status as a candidate, including, but not limited to, an action to enjoin defamation, defense of an action brought of a violation of state or local campaign, disclosure, or election laws, and an action from an election contest or recount. 2.52.090 Return of prohibited contributions. A. A contribution need not be reported nor shall it be deemed accepted if it is not cashed, negotiated, or deposited and is returned to the contributor before the closing date of the campaign statement on which the contribution would otherwise be reported, as provided by the California Political Reform Act. 2-11 Ordinance No. B. If a contribution is tendered and would be in violation of this chapter, it shall be returned by the candidate to the contributor within sixty days of receipt by the candidate. 2.52.100 Written solicitations by candidates. Any candidate making a written solicitation for a contribution for his or her campaign for City elective office shall include the following written notice in no less than six point type on each such solicitation: NOTICE The City of Chula Vista Municipal Code limits contributions to campaigns for City elective office to three hundred dollars per person. 2.52.110 Campaign statements. Each candidate shall file campaign statements with the City Clerk in the time and manner as required by the Political Reform Act of 1974 as amended (Government Code section 84100 et seq.). Compliance with the requirements of that Act shall be deemed to be compliance with this chapter. 2.52.120 Contributions for legal defense. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, a payment to or for the benefit of a Councilmember and Mayor, or candidate made and used for the express purpose of offsetting costs already incurred by that Councilmember, Mayor, or candidate in the defense of a criminal or administrative prosecutorial action against said Councilmember, Mayor, or candidate and not made or used for the purpose of aiding in the election of said Councilmember, Mayor, or candidate, and not made within (before or 2-12 Ordinance No. after) 100 days of an election in which the Councilmember, Mayor, or candidate is competing for a seat or office, shall not be deemed to be a contribution for the purposes of this chapter. 2.52.130 Duties of City Clerk. In addition to other duties required of the City Clerk under the terms of this chapter and City Charter, the Clerk shall: A. Supply appropriate forms and manuals prescribed by the California Fair Political Practices Commission. These forms and manuals shall be furnished to all candidates and committees, and to all other persons required to report. B. Determine whether required documents have been filed and, if so, whether they conform on their face with the requirements of state law. C. Notify promptly all persons and known committees who have failed to file a document in the form and at the time required by state law. D. Report alleged violations of this chapter filed pursuant to CVMC 2.52.140(E) and applicable state law to the enforcement authority. E. Compile and maintain a current list of all statements or parts of statements filed with the City Clerk's office pertaining to each candidate and each measure. F. Cooperate with the enforcement authority in the performance of the duties of the enforcement authority as prescribed in this chapter and applicable state laws. 2.52.140 Enforcement. 2-13 Ordinance No. A. The City Attorney shall not investigate orprosecute alleged violations of this chapter, but shall defend the constitutionality and legality of this chapter in any civil proceeding in which the City or the City Council is a party. B. The enforcement authority, as defined by this chapter, shall investigate or prosecute alleged violations of this chapter. C. The City Attorney shall solicit proposals from attorneys in accordance with Section 503 of the City Charter and Chapter 2.56 CVMC to act as the enforcement authority eleven months prior to a general election. As part of the annual budget process, the City Council shall appropriate no less than $100,000 to fund the retention of special counsel to serve as the enforcement authority. These funds shall be separate from the City Attorney's budget and used solely for the investigation and prosecution of alleged violations of this chapter. D. The City Attorney shall appoint a panel of no less than three attorneys to act as the enforcement authority. These attorneys shall be compensated by the City. Should the appointment of additional special counsel become necessary or appropriate, the City Attorney shall appoint additional special counsel as may be required. A single member of the special counsel panel shall be assigned to each case. Assignments shall be made on a rotating basis. E. Complaints of violations of this chapter shall be submitted in writing, under penalty of perjury, by a resident of the City to the City Clerk. The complaint shall state a full recitation of all facts that are alleged to constitute a violation of this chapter. F. The City Clerk shall forward the complaint to the enforcement authority 2-14 Ordinance No. within five working days of receipt for a probable cause determination. If no probable cause is determined to exist, the complaint shall be dismissed summarily and interested parties shall be notified of the dismissal in writing. G. If probable cause is determined to exist, the enforcement authority shall take further investigatory and procedural steps necessary to resolve the matter. H. Violations of this chapter may be pursued either through a civil or criminal action at the discretion of the enforcement authority. The enforcement authority may also commence and prosecute any necessary administrative proceedings or civil litigation to compel compliance with this chapter. No enforcement or prosecution or action by the enforcement authority shall be subject to the review or control of the City Attorney or City Council. I. The special counsel, serving as the enforcement authority, may investigate and may institute legal action to prevent further violations. The special counsel may decline to investigate if the allegation is also a violation of state law, and is the subject of a complaint filed with the Fair Political Practices Commission. J. Criminal prosecution for violations of this chapter must be commenced within one year after the date on which the violation occurred. K. Civil prosecution for violation of this chapter must be commenced within four years after the date on which the violation occurred. No administrative action alleging a violation of any of the provisions of this chapter shall be commenced more than five years after the date on which the violation occurred. If the person alleged to have violated a provision of this chapter engages in the fraudulent concealment of his or 2-15 Ordinance No. her acts or identity, the five-year period for administrative actions shall be tolled for the period of concealment. For purposes of this subdivision, "fraudulent concealment" means the person knows of material facts related to his or her duties under this chapter and knowingly conceals them in performing or omitting to perform those duties, for the purpose of defrauding the public of information to which it is entitled under this title. 1. Special counsel, serving as the enforcement authority, shall be immune to liability for enforcement of chapter. 2.52.150 Penalties. A. Any person who knowingly or willfully violates any provision of this chapter; who knowingly or willfully causes, solicits, advises, or participates with any other person to violate any provision of this chapter; or who knowingly or willfully aids and abets any other person in violation of any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. B. Any person who intentionally or negligently violates any provision of this chapter or causes any other person to violate any provision of this chapter shall be liable in a civil or administrative action brought by the enforcement authority for an amount not more than three times the amount the person failed to report properly or unlawfully contributed, expended, gave or received, or $5,000 per violation, whichever is greater. C. This section shall apply only to persons who have filing or reporting obligations under this chapter or the Political Reform Act, or who are compensated for services involving the planning, organization, or directing any activity regulated or required by this chapter or the Political Reform Act. 2-16 Ordinance No. D. Whether or not a violation is inadvertent, negligent, or deliberate, and the presence or absence of good faith shall be considered in applying the remedies and sanctions of this chapter. Further, in determining the amount of civil liability, the court may take into account the seriousness of the violation and the degree of culpability of the defendant. If a judgment is entered, the funds recovered shall be deposited into the City's general fund. 2.52.160 Severability. If any provision of this chapter, or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstances, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this chapter to the extent it can be given effect, or the application of those provisions to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are severable. Presented by: Approved as to form by: ~,htU~~ Moore 1 v I City Attorney ~~r CIty Attorney l:\AttomeyIJDAWSON\Ordinances\Campaign Finance\Campaign Finance ord (CLEAN CC OF REDLINEL10-1S-07.doc 2-17 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 11/13/07, Item .~ SUBMITTED BY: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING INFORMAL BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE (LB-139) CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY FLOORING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT TO VILLAGE CARPETS DIRECTOR OF ENeINE . G AND GENERAL SERVICES ~~. CITY MANAGER ASSISTANT CITY ANAGER S-r- 4/STHS VOTE: YES 0 NO ~ ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND Per section 1009 of the City's Charter, the Director of Engineering and General Services, in an effort to secure competitive prices from interested contractors, invited three contractors to submit informal bids for the construction of improvements to the Civic Center Library. The final date for submittal of informal bids was October 25,2007. RECOMMENDATION That Council adopt the resolution accepting informal bids and awarding a contract for the Civic Center Improvements (LB-139) to Village Carpets. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION The Civic Center Library carpet improvements consist of carpeting the entrance through the Reference sections. Specifications were prepared in house, and three contractors were invited to submit informal bids. CONTRACTOR BID Village Carpets - El Cajon, CA $ 43,719.00 Coastal Flooring Inc. - Chula Vista, CA $ 46,072.45 Howard's Rug Company - San Diego, CA $ 49,310.00 3-1 11/13/07, Iteml Page 2 of2 The apparent lowest bid by Village Carpets with a bid of $43,719.00 is below the project estimate of $45,000. The contractor has done numerous projects with the City of Chula Vista. The contractor's license has been verified and is in good standing. So as not to disrupt the public activities within the library during normal business hours, the work will be completed during non-business hours. Wage Statement The funding for this project is the Residential Construction Tax Fund (RCT), thus, prevailing wage is not required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section l5060(c) (3) of the State Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that the decision concerns repairs, replacement, or maintenance of existing City facilities and, therefore, there is not a material financial effect of the decision on the property holdings of the City Council Members pursuant to California Code of Regulations sections 1 8704.2(b)(2) and l8705.2(b)(1). FISCAL IMPACT There is no impact to the General Fund as there are sufficient funds in the proj ect necessary for completion. A breakdown ofproject costs is as follows: FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Contract Amount $43,719.00 B. Contingencies ( aoorox. 10% oer Council oolicy) $6,281.00 TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $ 50,000.00 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION Residential Construction Tax (LB-136) $50,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $50,000 Prepared by: Don Brown, Sr. Building Project Manager, Engineering and General Services Department M:\General Services\GS Administration\Council Agenda\LB-139\Award contract, 11-13-07.doc 3-2 RESOLUTION 2007- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING INFORMAL BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE (LB-139) CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY FLOORING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT TO VILLAGE CARPETS WHEREAS, per Section 1009 of the City's Charter, the Director of Engineering and General Services, in an effort to secure competitive prices from interested contractors, invited three contractors to submit informal bids for the construction of improvements to the Civic Center Library; and WHEREAS, the Civic Center Library carpet improvements consist of carpeting the entrance through the Reference sections; and WHEREAS, specifications were prepared in house, and three contractors were invited to submit informal bids as follows: CONTRACTOR BID Village Carpets - El Cajon, CA $ 43,719.00 Coastal Flooring Inc. - Chula Vista, CA $ 46,072.45 Howard's Rug Company - San Diego, CA $ 49,310.00 and; WHEREAS, the apparent lowest bid by Village Carpets with a bid of $43,719.00 is below the project estimate; and WHEREAS, the total cost of construction IS estimated at $50,000, including contingencies; and WHEREAS, there is no impact to the General Fund as there are sufficient funds in the project necessary for completion. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept informal bids and award a contract for the (LB-139) Civic Center Library Flooring Improvements Project to Village Carpets. Jack Griffin Director of Engineering and General Services Presented by 3-3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~\~ CITY OF J~CHULA VISTA 11/13/07, Item~ SUBMITTED BY: RESOLUTION REJECTING BIDS FOR OTAY PARK RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION (CIP NO. PR-277) AND DIRECTING STAFF TO RE-ADVERTISE THE PROJECT AND GENERAL SERVICE~~ . ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGER ASSISTANTCIT MANAGER =;.j 4/5THS VOTE: YES 0 NO ~ BACKGROUND On August 22, 2007 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Engineering and General Services received six (6) sealed bids for the "Otay Park Recreation Center Expansion (CIP No. PR-277)" project. Due to the contractors being non-responsive and with advice from the City Attorney's Office, staff recommends all bids be rej ected and the proj ect be re-advertised for new bids. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class I Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA Guidelines because the proposed project consists of minor alterations to an existing public facility involving no expansion of the facility's current use. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Council adopt resolution rejecting bids for Otay Park Recreation Center Expansion (CIP No. PR- 277) and directing staff to re-advertise the project. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION On Wednesday, August 22,2007 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Engineering and General Services received six (6) sealed bids for the "Otay Park Recreation Center Expansion (CIP No. PR-277)" project. Strict adherence to the contract administration guidelines established by the State of California and by the Federal Community Block Grant programs is required to avoid potential loss of future funding. Upon close examination of the bid documents from all bids received, and with advice from the City Attorney's Office, several errors by the contractors cause the 4-1 11/13/07 Item-L Page 2 of3 received bids to be non-responsive. Staff recommends that Council reject all bids and direct staff to re-advertise the project. Once staff re-advertises the project, a mandatory pre-bid meeting will be held one week prior to the actual deadline for bid submittals. At the pre-bid meeting, staff will conduct a "question and answer" session with any interested prospective bidders to assist them in understanding the documents required for Community Block Grant projects and better assure we receive responsive bids. PROJECT BID RESULTS The City of Chula Vista's Engineering and General Services Department prepared the plans, contract documents and technical specifications for the "Otay Park Recreation Center Expansion (CIP No. PR-277)" CIP project. City staff also prepared and advertised the project for bidding. Staff received and opened bids on Wednesday, August 22, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. The lowest responsive bidder for the project was based on the contractor who submitted all required documents detailed in the contract documents and who submitted the lowest base bid for the project construction. None of the contractors submitted all required documents detailed in the contract documents. Bids from the six (6) contractors were received as follows (Bids sorted by the base bid amount): CONTRACTOR BASE BID I. Fordyce Construction - Santee, CA $391,754.00 2. M. A. Stevens Company - National City, CA $393,000.00 3. APC Inc. - ImperiaIBeach, CA $394,900.00 4. HAR Construction - Chula Vista, CA $438,831.00 5. Healey Construction - National City, CA $466,882.00 6. Randell Construction - San Diego, CA $549,000.00 The low bid from Fordyce is above the Engineer's estimated range of $220,000.00 to $250,000.00 by $141,754.00 or approximately 43.0%. The Engineer's estimate was prepared by the City's architectural consultant and was based on average unit prices for similar types of work completed recently. City Staff will incorporate the unit price bid results received into a database for future project cost estimates. Staffrecommends rejecting bids due to the contractors being non-responsive. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. 4-2 11/13/07 Item-A:- Page 3 of 3 FISCAL IMPACT There is no impact to the General Fund. The funds for these improvements have been provided from the Southwest Town Center Redevelopment Fund, Community Block Grant, and State Recreation Grants. Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require only routine City building maintenance. PROJECT BUDGET FOR CONSTRUCTION A. State Recreation Grants $80,000.00 B. Community Block Grant $220,000.00 C. Southwest Town Center Redevelopment Fund $300,000.00 TOTAL BUDGET FOR CONSTRUCTION $600,000.00 Prepared by: Don Brown, Sr. Project Supervisor, Engineering and General Services Department M:\General Services\GS Administration\Council Agenda\Otay Rec Center Expansion (PR277)\PR277 Reject August 2007.10192007.PGS.doc 4-3 RESOLUTION NO. 2007- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE REJECTION OF BIDS FOR OTAY PARK RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT (CIP NO. PR-277) AND DIRECTING STAFF TO RE- ADVERTISE THE PROJECT. WHEREAS, City staff prepared the plans, contract documents and technical speci fications for the Otay Park Recreation Center Expansion Project (CIP No. PR-277); and WHEREAS, on Wednesday, August 22, 2007 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of General Services received six (6) sealed bids as follows: CONTRACTOR BASE BID l. Fordyce Construction - Santee, CA $391,754.00 7 M. A. Stevens Company - National City, CA $393,000.00 0 APC Inc. - Imperial Beach, CA $394,900.00 -'. 4. HAR Construction - Chula Vista, CA $438,831.00 5. Healey Construction - National City, CA $466,882.00 6. Randell Construction - San Diego, CA $549,000.00 and: WHEREAS, the City must strictly adhere to the contract administration guidelines established by the State of Califomia and by the Federal Community Block Grant programs to avoid potential loss of future funding; and WHEREAS, staff has closely examined the bid documents from all bids received and noticed several errors by the contractors that cause the bids to be non-responsive; and WHEREAS, staff recommends that the City Council reject all bids and direct staff to re- advertise the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that it authorizes the rejection of all bids received on August 22, 2007 for the Otay Park Recreation Center Expansion Project (CIP No. PR277) and directs staff to re-advertise the project. Presented by Approved as to form by Jack Griffin Director of Engineering and General Services L/L~ 0 /;~~ fr'- Ann Moore City Attomey II:[N( ilNEER\RES()S',Resos2007\11-\ 3-07\PR277 RCS(l revisc:u by eC.dm: 4-4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: 11/13/07, Item 5 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE "TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS NAPLES STREET BY HARBORS IDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (TF-347)" PROJECT TO LEKOS ELECTRIC, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,640, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF ALL AVAILABLE FUNDS IN THE J;'ROJECT DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND GENERAL SERVICES ~~ . CITY MANAGER AJ/J.k- ASSISTANT CITY ~JA(iER sr-- 4/5THS VOTE: YES 0 NO [gj BACKGROUND On September 26, 2007, the City Engineer received sealed bids for the "Traffic Calming Improvements, Naples Street by Harborside Elementary School (TF-347)" project. The work proposed by this project aims to improve pedestrian safety at the mid-block crossing in front of Harborside Elementary and at the trolley track crossing west of the school as well as slow down traffic traveling along Naples Street. The traffic calming measures proposed include in-roadway crosswalk lights, median islands to provide a pedestrian refuge, speed limit feedback signs, and various other signs and striping changes to accommodate the new improvements as well as improve the safety mid-block crossing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 1 categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facility) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it involves installation of various traffic calming devices (crosswalk striping, speed signs, etc.) within an existing street. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Council approve the resolution accepting bids and awarding the contract for the "Traffic Calming Improvements, Naples Street by Harborside Elementary School (TF-347)" project to Lekos Electric, Inc. of El Cajon, CA in the amount of $80,640.00 and authorizing the expenditure of all available funds in the project. 5-1 11/13/07, Item2- Page 2 of 4 BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION Naples Street, between Broadway and Industrial Blvd., has been a location Traffic Engineering has monitored for some time due to pedestrian safety and speeding concerns voiced by residents of the area as well as Harborside Elementary School staff. To address the areas of concern, a Capital Improvement Project was created with the fiscal year 2006-07 Capital Improvement Program budget titled "School Crosswalk - ColoradolNaples by Harborside Elementary." The original project proposed improvements to the existing mid-block pedestrian crossing in front of Harborside Elementary as well as sidewalk improvements along Naples Street and Colorado Avenue. Since the project was originally created, City staff applied for, and successfully received, $288,800 in grant funding for the project. As a result, on February 6, 2007, the City Council adopted two resolutions: . Resolution 2007-032 accepted California State Funds under the Safe Routes to School Program in the amount of $288,800 and appropriated the same amount from the State Grant Fund as well as an additional $10,000 from developer deposit revenue towards the Harborside Elementary School Traffic Calming Project. . Resolution 2007-033 established a new CIP, "Harborside Elementary School Traffic Calming" (TF-347) project, appropriated a total of $338,800 from various fuods to cover the cost of the improvements and the City's required grant fuoding match. As indicated in the previous February 6, 2007 agenda statement, the scope of work for the project (further detailed in the attached grant application) focuses on improving the pedestrian school route to Harborside Elementary by enhancing the mid-block crosswalk on Naples Street directly in front of the school as well as install approximately 450 feet of new sidewalk on the west side of Colorado A venue. However, since receiving the grant, the northwest comer of the Naples Street / Colorado Avenue intersection was redeveloped and the needed sidewalk was installed. City staff has coordinated with the State and amended our scope of work for the project removing the line item for sidewalk improvements. As a result of the elimination of sidewalk improvements from the project, staff was able to further enhance the mid-block crosswalk in front of Harborside Elementary. The final design for the project now includes the following features, including several that will be the first of their kind in the City ofChula Vista: . Raised medians to provide a pedestrian refuge for the mid-block crosswalk in front of Harborside Elementary as well as slow cars down through the area . In-roadway crosswalk lighting making the crosswalk more visible. The technology being implemented by this project is slightly different to that seen along the 300 block of Third Avenue and should result in much less maintenance issues for City staff . Radar feedback signs to tell drivers how fast they are traveling and remind them of the speed limit. This will be the first installation of such technology in the City of Chula Vista. . Overhead flashing beacons alerting drivers of the pedestrian crosswalk. This will be the first installation of such technology in the City of Chula Vista. . Pedestrian crossing signs at the trolley track crossing west of Harbors ide Elementary 5-2 11/13/07, Item5- Page 3 of 4 Having finalized the design, City staff advertised the project on August 24, 2007, and received four bids on September 26, 2007. The following table is a summary of the bids received: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT l. Lekos Electric, Inc. - El Cajon, CA $80,640.00 2. HMS Construction, Inc. - San Marcos, CA $90,328.00 3. Zondiros Corporation - San Marcos, CA $149,600.00 4. T & M Electric, Inc.- Santee, CA $1,013.745.00 The low bid submitted by Lekos Electric, Inc. ofEl Cajon, CA is below the Engineer's estimate of $131 ,600.00 by $50,960.00. Lekos Electric, Incorporated has recently installed a traffic signal project in the City with satisfactory performance. The bid submitted by T & M Electric has some discrepancies with their unit prices on some of their bid items resulting in a total bid amount of approximately $1 million; a bid significantly higher than any other bid received and strictly due to said discrepancies. Disclosure Statement Attachment 3 is a copy of Disclosure Statement for the lowest bidder, Lekos Electric. Wage Statement The source of funding for this project is State Grant funds. Contractors bidding this project were required to pay the State of California prevailing wages to persons employed by them for the work under this project. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council Members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. FISCAL IMPACT The project's original grant application listed the project's total cost as $338,800.00. The application requested grant reimbursement of up to $288,800.00 with the City of Chula Vista paying the remaining $50,000 as matching funds required by the grant. Because the 450 ft. of sidewalk initially proposed as part of the project has since been constructed by a private developer, the cost of the project is now significantly less than what was originally estimated. The City will only be reimbursed for the remaining improvements as well as advertising expenses and staff time (straight costs only - not full cost recovery), but is still obligated to provide $50,000 in matching funds. Staff therefore anticipates a reimbursement amount equal to the total cost for the project minus the $50,000 City match. This match will be funded using $10,000 in developer deposits and $40,000 of traffic signal fees (see tables). Staff will process the first reimbursement invoice to Caltrans after the award of the proj ect per the program supplemental agreement special covenants number seven. According to Council Policy No. 574-01, change orders exceeding 10% of any contract under $100,000 must receive Council approval first. However, approval of tonight's resolution will increase the Director of Public Work's authority to approve change orders up to the contingency amount of $16,128 (20%), an increase of $8,064. This additional authority is being requested 5-3 11/13/07, Item .s Page 4 of 4 because several of the improvements being implemented, as previously mentioned in this report, are new to the City of Chula Vista and its staff and as a result, minor, unforeseen circumstances may arise during the construction of these improvements. Normally, staff would be able to react to changing circumstances in the field and make any necessary funding requests to City Council in an appropriate timeframe. However, this proj ect, being directly in front of an elementary school, has a targeted construction period that coincides with Harborside Elementary School's winter break so as little disturbance to the school as possible is seen. The combination of the new technology being implemented and the tight construction timeframe for this project resulted in the 20% contingency recommendation so that, should issues arise, they can be' dealt with quickly and the project can remain on schedule. FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Contract Amount $80,640.00 B. Contingencies (20%) $16,128.00 C. Anticipated Staff Time Including: $65,000 Construction Inspection Design/Construction Management Survey Work Planning/EnvironmentalfTraffic/LandscapelPublic Works TOTAL FUNDS ANTICIPATED FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION $161,768.00 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION A. State Grant Fund (Approximate amount to be reimbursed by Safe Route $111,768.00 to School Grant Program - SR2SL 5203 (023)) B. Developer's Deposit; Account Number DEI952 (KIMCO/Costco $10,000.00 remaining funds; a portion of the City's matching funds) C. Traffic Signal Fee Fund (A portion of the City's matching funds) $40,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $161,768.00 Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require only routine City street maintenance and minimal electricity costs for the flashing pedestrian lights. ATTACHMENTS I. Program Supplement Agreement No, C43 2. Resolutions 2007-032 and 2007-033 3. Contractor's Disclosure Statement Prepared by: Mari Malong, Assistant Engineer, Engineering and G eneral Services Dept. M:\Engineer\AGENDA \CAS2007\11-13-07\TF347awardagenda.doc 5-4 ATTACHMENT I rile;.: 0735 -ID-\F34-7 PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. C43 to ADMINISTERING AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT FOR STATE FUNDED PROJECTS NO. 000203 Date : August 04,2006 Location: II-SD-O-CIN proj ect Number: SR2SL-5203(023) E .A. Number :11-956438 Locode , 5203 This PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, effective 1.1'-\ /IJD, hereby incorporates into the Administering Agency - State Agreement No. 000203 for State Fun4ed Projects which was entered into between the ADMINlSTERING AGENCY and the STATE with an effective date of 07/25/03 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT is executed in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. I C\ d,~ 0 approved by the ADMINlSTERING AGENCY on !P .11-'\1 (See copy attached). The ADMINlSTERING AGENCY lilrther stipulates that as a condition to the payment by the State of any funds derived from sources noted below encumbered to this project, it accepts and will comply with the Special Covenants and Remarks set forth on the following pages. PROJECT LOCATION: Naples St at Colorado Ave. near Interstate 5 TYPE OF WORK: enhance crosswalk, installing missing pedestrian facilities and calming veh Estimated Cost State Funds Matohing 'Funds STATE 8288,800.00 LOCAL OTHER 8338,800.00 850,000.00 80.00 80.00 CITY OF CIIULA VISTA By ~~ I L / '''1/06. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Depar~t ~f Transportation , lu.7L-~ ~ By :--;/ (jV6hief, Office of Project Xmplementation . Division of Local Assistanoe ./.' ]...... Date '1, '2--007 I Date Title CrT'7 E.J..-G.2,., ~ Chapter udgeted funds are available for this encumbrance: r bexeby certify upon my Accounting Officer Date ~~D'7-0(O 8288,800.00 Prcg::u:1 Fund ScurCEI ""OUNT 38 2005 2660-102-042 2005-2006 20.30.010.535 c 262040 042-T 288,800.00 Program Supplem.eut OO-D203-C43- SERIAL Page 1. of 5 5-5 Il-SD-O-CHV 08/04/2006 SR2SL-5203(023) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS ~. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will reimburse the STATE for the ADMINISTERING AGENCY share of costs for work requested to be performed by the STATE. 2. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the encumbrance of funds under this Agreement. Funding and reimbursement are available only upon the passage of the State Budget Act containing these STATE funds. 3. ~. This Program Supplement Agreement (PSA) is intended for Safe Route to School (SR2S) Program funded with State-only funding. Separate agreements are needed if PROJECT is also funded with any other STATE administered State or Federal funds. 2. The PROJECT will be administered in accordance with the SR2S Program Guidelines (LPP 02-01 effective March ~1, 2002), as approved and amended, and the PROJECT Application. 3. This PSA allows reimbursement of eligible PROJECT expenditures to the ADMINISTERING AGENCY for which State funds are allocated. The effective State allocation date establishes eligibility for the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to start reimbursable work and seek reimbursement of funds. Any work done prior to the effective allocation date is not eligible for reimbursement from the SR2S funds. 4. The. STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agree that SR2S funds available for reimbursement to the ADMINISTERING AGENCY by the STATE will be limited to the amount allocated and encumbered by the STATE. Any additional funds made available by future allocations will be encumbered on this PROJECT by use of a STATE approved Allocation Letter and Finance Letter. 5. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit to the STATE, Exhibit 24-B "Project Status Report" as required by the SR2S Program Guidelines. 6. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to encumber the funds under agreement and award the construction contract by June 30th of the fiscal year in which funds are programmed. For projects unable to meet this deadline, the ADMINISTERING AGENCY may request, in Program Supplement 00-0203-C43- SERIAL Page 2 of 5 5-6 1 J-SD-O-CHV 08/04/2006 SR2SL-5203(023) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS writing, a time Engineer (DLAE). one year, may be the new deadline extension from the District Local Assistance A one-time extension, for a maximum period of granted by the DLAE. Projects unable to meet may be dropped from the program. 7. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to provide contract award information to the STATE when submitting first invoice for this PROJECT. Attachment I of this PSA may be used for providing the necessary contract award information. 8. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit the "Report of Expenditures" to the DLAE within six (6) months after the project completion in accordance with Section 17.5 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). 9. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to follow all relevant State laws and requirements including the ,California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 4. Any State and Federal funds that may have been 'encumbered for this project are only available for disbursement for a period of five (5) years and seven (7) years, respectively, from the: start of the fiscal year(s) that those funds were appropriated within the State Budget Act. All project funds not liquidated within these periods will revert unless an executed Cooperative Work Agreement extending these dates is requested and is approved by the California Department of Finance per Government Code Section 16304. The exact date of each fund reversion will be reflected in the approved finance letter(s) issued for this project. Notwithstanding the unliquidated sums of project specific State and Federal funding remaining and available to fund project work, any invoice for reimbursement that is not submitted to the Department on or before 60 days after that applicable fixed fund reversion date will not be paid from that fiscal year's encumbered funds because all of these unexpended funds will be irrevocably reverted by the Department's Division of Accounting on that date. Pursuant to a directive from the State Controller's Office and Progr~ Suppkeme~tOO-0203-C43- SBRIAL Page 3 of 5 5-7 T Il-SD-O-CHV 08/0412006 SR2SL-5203(023) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS the Department of Finance, the last date to submit invoices for reimbursed work in each fiscal year is May 15th in order for payment to be made out of those then current appropriations. Project work performed and invoiced after May 15th will be reimbursed only out of available funding that might be encumbered in the subsequent fiscal year, and then only when those funds are actually allocated and encumbered as authorized by the California Transportation Commission and the Department's Accounting Office. 5. Billing Cycle ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit invoices in arrears for reimbursement of participating PROJECT costs at least once every six months commencing after the funds are encumbered for each phase by the execution of this PROJECT PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT or by STATE's future approval of an applicable Finance Letter. The total of all invoiced amounts claimed, plus any required matching funds, must not exceed the actual total cost allowable under this PROGP~ SUPPLEMENT for all authorized and completed PROJECT. engineering work, right of way acquisition, and construction. If no costs have been invoiced for a six-month period, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall submit a written explanation (with target billing date and target billing amount) of the absence of PROJECT activity. Should ADMINSTERING AGENCY fail to invoice for participating PROJECT costs incurred (including a written explanation when no invoice is submitted) within one year of the issuance of the PROJECT authorization to proceed by STATE or from the next invoice due date following the last PROJECT invoice, STATE may de-obligate and reassign to another party any unexpended Federal funds without notice to ADMINSTERING AGENCY. STATE may also not process any future request for authorization to proceed submitted by the ADMINSTERING AGENCY. Final Billing ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that it shall submit the Final Invoice and Final Detail Estimate within 180 days of PROJECT completion. ADMINISTERING AGENCY's failure to submit these Program SupplementOO-0203-C43- SERIAL Page 4 of 5 5-8 J I-SD-O-CHV 08/04/2006 SR2SL-5203(023) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS documents will result in sanctions imposed upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY by STATE in accordance with Chapter 17.6, "Consequences For lion-Compliance", of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. De-obligate Federal Funds for Construction Phase ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that if the estimated PROJECT construction cost is less than the obligated amount for construction by more than $50,000, that excess amount of federal funds initially obligated is subject to de-obligation by STATE once the project has been awarded by ADMINSTERING AGENCY. Program SupplementOO-02C3-C43w SERZAL Page 5 of 5 5-9 .--."'-.... , RESOLUTION NO. 19290 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE DESIGNATION OFTHE DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER AS THE POSITION AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE. FOR AND IN BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ALL .PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT" AGREEMENTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS, APPLICATIONS AND REOUESTS FOR REIMBURSEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING CERTAIN FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADMINISTERING AGENCY - STATE MASTER AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECTS NO. 11- 5203 WHEREAS, on June 17, 1997. the Chula Vista City Council approved the Administering Agency-State Master Agreement for Federal Aid Projects No. 11-5203: and WHEREAS. the Master Agreement provides the basis for all the transactions required through the State before Federal Aid funds can be released to the City: and WHEREAS, this resolution will authorize the DepvtY Public Works Director/City Engineer to execute for and in behalf of the City of Chula Vista all "Program Supplement'; agreements and related documents, applications and requests for reimbursement for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance in accordance with said Master Agreement for Federal Aid Projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CitY Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the designation of the Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer as the position authorized to execute for and in behalf of the City of Chula Vista all 'Program Supplement" agreements and related documents, applications and requests for reimbursement for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistence in accordance with the Administering Agency-State Master Agreement for Federal Aid Projects No. 11-5203. Presented by Approved as to form by .. ~MhIJ(,(z)1.-':C1 ) ._l''tJohn,{' Lippitt . :.' Publfc Works Director (~~~O J'6l:lf1 M. Kaheny , / /ty Attorney , J 5-10 Resolution 19290 Page 2 PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chule Vista. California, this 8~ day of December. 1998. by the fonowing vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NAYS: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: .o.T!EST: ~ C (2~iJd 8a....rl'f.A. ;t\u~helet, CIty Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF CHULA VISTA Davis, Moot, Padilla, Salas and Harron None None None JJA./-f ~. or, /b:h TIIA Shirley Honoff. Mayor I. Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.1 9290 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista CitY Council held on the 8~ day of December, 1998. Executed this B'" day aT December, 1998. ~ C ;;Ldd. fdl Beverly A. AutheJet, City Clerk 5-11 'r ., ATTACHMEN1..-L RESOLUTION NO. 2007-032 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING CALIFORNIA STATE FUNDS UNDER THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $288,800 FOR THE "HARBORS IDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECT' WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) establishes and administers the Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Program to fund the construction of bicycle and pedestrian safety and traffic calming projects; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista applied for grant funding through the SR2S program to improve pedestrian facilities adjacent to Harborside Elementary School; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista received word on July 28, 2006, that the grant application had been approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista appropriates $288,800 from the State Grant Fund based upon revenue from the Safe Routes to School Program, and $10,000 based upon developer deposit revenue to the Harborside Elementary School Traffic Calming Project (TF-347). Presented by Approved as to form by ~.%?-R~ Scott Tulloch City Engineer <t""\)"~~{'~ . Ann Moore \ City Attorney 5-12 Resolution No. 2007-032 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City ofChula Vista, California, this 6th day of February 2007 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, Rindone, and Cox NAYS: I Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None Cheryl~y~ ATIEST: -~UtL../~ 0 Susan Bigelow, MMe, City erk lOr- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certilY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2007-032 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 6th day of February 2007. Executed this 6th day of February 2007. ~116 ,-t ~~......J~ Susan Bigelow, MMC, City Cle 5-13 RESOLUTION NO. 2007-033 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING A NEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT "HARBORSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRAFFIC CALMING" (TF-347), AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS OF $288,800 IN STATE FUNDS, $40,000 IN TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUNDS FOR CITY'S COST SHARE, AND $10,000 IN DEVELOPER'S REMAINING FUNDS WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) establishes and administers the Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Program to fund the construction of bicycle and pedestrian safety and traffic calming proj ects; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista applied for grant funding through the SR2S program to improve pedestrian facilities adjacent to Harborside Elementary School; and WHEREAS, the City of ChuIa Vista received word on July 28, 2006, that the grant application had been approved; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista has accepted the SR2S Program grant funds in the amount of $288,800 to be applied towards the Harborside Elementary School Traffic Calming Project; and WHEREAS, in compliance with the grant application, the City is obligated to provide $50,000 of matching funds to be applied towards the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby establishes a new Capital Improvement Project titled "Harborside Elementary School Traffic Calming" (TF-347). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista appropriates $288,800 from the State Grant Fund (Account Number 73651) to be applied towards the Harborside Elementary School Traffic Calming Project (TF-347). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista appropriates $40,000 from the available balance of the Traffic Signal Fund to the Harborside Elementary School Traffic Calming project (TF-347). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista appropriates $10,000 in funds deposited with the City resulting from a development obligation (Account Number DE1952) to be applied towards the City's cost sharing obligation for the Harborside Elementary School Traffic Calming Project (TF-347). 5-14 Resolution No. 2007-033 Page 2 Presented by Approved as to form by ;:;2c:--~?? e Scott Tulloch City Engineer ~1"~~ Ann Moore ' City Attorney PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City ofChula Vista, California, this 6th day of February 2007 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, Rindone, and Cox NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None aLt~ Cheryl Cox, May A TIEST: - ~~ - ~11&l ~ Susan Bigelow, MMC, ity Cle STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2007-033 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 6th day of February 2007. Executed this 6th day of February 2007. - - ~I, 16,-- ~, ls'J ~ Susan Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk 5-15 ATIACHMENT _3 CITY OF CH1JLA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters that will require discretionary action by the Council, Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista ejection must be filed. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. NIp" 2. If any person * identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals with a $2000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) entity. }lIp- 3. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. l'li!1 I I I I 'I ! I ! .:1 ~ :; 4. . Please identify every person, inCluding any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. ~/A 5. Has any person. associated with this contract had any financial dealings with an official.. of the City ofChula Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months? Yes_No~ NO 14 IICitywide2000lhomelEngineerl TRAFFIClACAD DwgslST ANDARD DWGS (ACAD)ICIP PROJECTSITF-347HarborsideITF- 347Specs.doc 5-16 I I If Yes, briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official" may have in this conlract. t--IIA I I I 6. Have you made a contribution of more than $25.P'within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council? No ~ Yes _ If yes, which Council member? 7. Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official** of the City ofChula Vista in the past twelve (12) months? (T\)is includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc.) Yes _ No ~ I I If Yes, which official** and what was the nature of item provided? I I Date: !)-;).5-07 ~~~ I Signature of Contractor! Applicant I iER.E5,cr E.. L-~ K t1.5 Print or type name of Contractorl Applicant I * Person is defined as: any individual, firm, co-parmership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, district, or other political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit. I ** Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, Council member, Planning Commissioner, Member of a board, commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staff members. . I I . . 15 IICitywide2000\homelEngineerITRAFFIC\ACAD DwgslST ANDARD DWGS (ACAD)\ClP PROlECTS\TF-347HarborsideITF- 347Specs.doc . 5-17 RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND A WARDING CONTRACT FOR THE "TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS NAPLES STREET BY HARBORSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (TF-347)" PROJECT TO LEKOS ELECTRIC, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,640 AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF ALL AVAILABLE FUNDS IN THE PROJECT WHEREAS, on September 26,2007, the City Engineer received four (4) sealed bids for the "Traffic Calming Improvements Naples Street by Harborside Elementary School (TF-347)" project; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class I Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it involves installation of various traffic calming devices (crosswalk striping, speed signs, etc.) within an existing street. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary; and WHEREAS, the City received bids from four (4) contractors as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT 1. Lekos Electric, Inc. - EI Cajon, CA $80,640.00 2. HMS Construction, Inc. - San Marcos, CA $90,328.00 3. Zondiros Cornoration - San Marcos, CA $149,600.00 4. T & M Electric, Inc.- Santee, CA $1,013.745.00 WHEREAS, the low bid submitted by Lekos Electric, Inc. of EI Cajon, CA is below the Engineer's estimate of $131,600.00 by $50,960.00. Lekos Electric, Incorporated has recently installed a traffic signal project in the City with satisfactory performance. The bid submitted by T & M Electric has some discrepancies with their unit prices on some of their bid items resulting in a total bid amount of approximately $1 million; a bid significantly higher than any other bid received and strictly due to said discrepancies; and WHEREAS, the total cost of the design and construction of this project is estimated at $161,768, which includes a $16,128 contingency and approximately $65,000 in staff time. WHEREAS, the source of funding for this project is from a State Grant and a required City match in the amounts of $111,768 (SR2SL 5203 (023)) estimated and up to $50,000 ($10,000 Developer's deposit (Account # DE-1952) and $40,000 (Traffic Signal Fees)), respectively; and WHEREAS, the state grant will be provided to the City on a reimbursement basis. Staff will process the first reimbursement invoice to Caltrans after the award of the project per the program supplemental agreement special covenants number seven; and 5-18 WHEREAS, contractors bidding this project were required to pay the State of California prevailing wages to persons employed by them for the work under this project; and WHEREAS, Staff requests that City Council waive the limitations related to change orders identified in City Council Policy 574-01 to permit the Director of Public Works to approve change orders as necessary up to the contract contingency amount; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept bids and award the contract for the "Traffic Calrning Improvements Naples Street by Harborside Elemetary School (TF-347)" project to Lekos Electric, Inc. in the amount of $80,640.00, authorize the expenditure from funds SR2SL 5203 (023), Developer's Deposit Account # DE-1952, and Traffic Signal Fees, in the amounts $111,768, $10,000, and $40,000, respectively; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City Of Chula Vista does hereby waive the requirements of City Council Policy 574-01 to permit the Director of Public Works to approve change orders as necessary up to the contract contingency amount. Jack Griffin Director of Engineering and General Services Presented by K:\ENGINEERIRESOSlResos2007\1l-13-2007\TF347 Reso for Award.doc 5-19 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~~f:. CITY OF 1<~~~ (HUlA VISTA Item No.:t't; Meeting Date: 11/13/07 ITEM TITLE: A. An Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista adding Chapter 15.06, Administrative Provisions for the Technical Building Codes, to the Chula Vista Municipal Code. B. An Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista Amending Chapter 15.08 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code Adopting The California Building Code, 2007 Edition. C. An Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista Amending Chapter 15.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code adopting The California Referenced Standards Code, 2007 Edition. D. An Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista Amending Chapter 15.16 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code adopting The California Mechanical Code, 2007 Edition. E. An Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista Amending Chapter 15.24 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code Adopting The California Electrical Code, 2007 Edition. F. An Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista Amending Chapter 15.28 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code Adopting The California Plumbing Code, 2007 Edition. G. An Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista Amending Chapter 15.36 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code Adopting The California Fire Code, 2007 Edition. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning and BUildin~ Fire Chie~ fO~ D4P,- '7 ,--- 4/SthVote: Yes_No..L REVIEWED BY: City Manager Assistant City 6-1 Page 2, Item No.: rh Meeting Date: 11/13/07 BACKGROUND The California Building Standards Commission has mandated that jurisdictions within the State start enforcing the 2007 Editions of the California building codes on January 1, 2008. The adoption of California building codes is a routine action undertaken by the City in response to newly State adopted building codes. This action will allow the City to incorporate appropriate local amendments into the enforcement program. The adoption of the various 2007 California building codes is in conformance with City Council Policy 352-01 as adopted by Resolution 5656 which endorses the establishment and maintenance of uniform building regulations within the jurisdictions of the County of San Diego. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 1506l(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is exempt from the provisions ofCEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council place the ordinances of the various 2007 Editions of the California building codes on first reading. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Board of Appeals and Advisors at their Monday, October 8, 2007 meeting unanimously recommended adoption of the various 2007 Editions of the California building codes. DISCUSSION As mandated by the California Building Standards Commission (CBSe), jurisdictions within the State shall begin enforcing the 2007 Editions of the California building codes on January 1,2008. Traditionally, the State adopts and amends updated codes every three years. Due to actions taken by the CBSC during prior adoption cycles, the State continued adopting the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) as the base code for the California Building Code (CBe), including the current 2001 CBC. The 1997 UBC has not been modified since 1996. All of the reference standards in that code are outdated. During this adoption cycle, the CBSC adopted the 2006 International Building Code (mC) as the base code for the 2007 CBC. The 2007 CBC is significantly different than the current 2001 CBC and in many cases the updates to the reference standards involve major changes in structural and fire resistance design practices. Code enforcement personnel, design professionals and others involved in the building construction industry will have to become familiar with different wind, seismic and material design standards that are three additions more recent. This will require a considerable amount of training for staff and the industry. It is estimated to take 30% more time to plan review a project under the 2007 CBC than the current code. Furthermore, in addition to purchasing new code books, jurisdictions and the industry will also have to purchase a considerable number of updated design standards that are now referenced in the 2007 CBC. 6-2 Page 3, Item No.: /D Meeting Date: 11/13/07 In addition, and for the purpose of compatibility with the 2006 IBC, the CBSC adopted the 2006 International Fire Code (IFC) as the base code for the 2007 California Fire Code (CFC). This code is also significantly different than prior fire codes enforced in California. The remaining codes recommended for adoption are based on recent editions of prior base codes and, therefore, should represent less of a challenge for our staff and the industry to incorporate into their design and construction practices. Proposed Municipal Code Chapter 15.06: The proVISIOns of Chapter 15.06 serve as the administrative, organizational and enforcement rules and regulations for the following technical building codes: The 2007 California Building Code The 2007 California Mechanical Code The 2007 California Plumbing Code The 2007 California Electrical Code The 2005 California Energy Code The 2007 California Referenced Standards Code The above noted codes are developed by different organizations; the Building Code is developed by the International Code Council, the Plumbing and Mechanical Codes are developed by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, and the Electrical Code is developed by the National Fire Protection Association. The administrative provisions within these codes are similar with a few differences that need to be amended in order to establish consistency within each other and with existing provisions contained in the Municipal Code. Chapter 15.06 consolidates the administrative provisions of the above noted codes and incorporates local administrative provisions. Having one set of provisions facilitates the administration of the codes and future code adoptions. Most of the local amendments to the adopted codes are amendments to administrative provisions that are within each code. Having the provisions consolidated under one chapter reduces, and in some cases, eliminates local amendments. The administrative provisions in the Fire Code are different from the codes noted above, and therefore, the provisions of Chapter 15.06 do not apply to the Fire Code. Jurisdictions within San Diego County have met collectively to discuss suggested amendments to the codes during monthly meetings of the San Diego Area Chapter of the International Code Council. As such, this process recognizes and promotes code uniformity throughout the jurisdictions within the County creating a positive professional environment among all code users. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Not Applicable. Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Section 16704.2(a)(I) is not applicable to this decision. 6-3 Page 4, Item No.: & Meeting Date: 11/13/07 FISCAL IMPACT There are no increases in fees proposed in this adoption. The cost of new code books and related training is included in the current year's budget. Attachments: 1. Minutes of October 8,2007 Board of Appeals & Advisors Meeting Prepared by: Lou EI-Khazen, Deputy Building Official, Planning and Building Department H:\BLD _ HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\A 113 2007 California Building Codes.doc.dot 6-4 ...q U4<-f-t^-15NT ~ Board of Appeals & Advisors Meeting Minutes Page 2 OctoberL8.,.2007 /~~' C. Adoption of the various 2007 Editions for the California Building Codes _. . Lou EI-Khazen and Justin Gipson presented information on the adoptip,,'! for the California Building Codes. Mr. EI-Khazen started by stating" the we go through every 3 years. He talked about the sta " background discussion of this adoption process. He pointed '. w chapte . ~iCh deals with Administrative Provisions for technical codes: 2007 C. rnia Buildlng~,(t07 California Mechanical Code, 2007 California Plumbing C 007 California Eleclric~I~~g'" 2005 Califomia Energy Code, and 2007 California.., ...... .ehced Standards Code. "', adoption cycle is different this year because City Is ad9il: fI9 a completely new Building Co and Fire Code. These new codes take effect Ja '''''jh'', 2008. This means that any penmil applications Planning and Building Departme . S in, on and after this date, needs to comply with these new codes. He stated,d,~ ,,'. chapter 15.06 )1as provisions that we currently enforce and the City is just 9.!:,J)~lliiating them into.o c:;hapter. Mr. Remp commented that we are proposing veryi~:~mendments to th i' allfomia Codes. Mr. Remp also said consolidating all of the Ad ~-,,",- ,. tive section ne area to make it more adoptable to changes in the future. The Pub' . i S\!1!t,... ow that they only need to go to one place to understand the Adminis " ._~.,,~~;of the Code. Mr. EI-Khazen lastly stated that City S~aff will receive extensive ~t~mg19P'these. new Codes, and the City acknowledges that It Will take about 30 percent more;.timedo review a project under these new codes. ..' '.. :.- Member Turner asked, . . ""'-endi~g the adoP'lom'.are they also indirectly recommending some ,. changes a . ,C1'wtl!jt is the Impact of the Budget on this? Mr. Ramp ans ying with J.~~~~ '.. t!~Sb.!l~!ruction activity the Buiiding Department Is experiencin will fre.eFu""rTibre CI ~!q;participate in training on these new Codes. He said the ot proposed mC1dification to the Fee Schedule .. b,j~~'lf~as adopted fair e aiso said the difficulty will be that construction '"-dUl;!t!Y@ .. [lot embraced nitude of this code change. So as a result, the 'Cjfl!3tfltel .. ustry hasn't h ecessary training on these new codes. This will place an additio en on City Sta' the industry transitions to the new codes. Member T, . xpressed conce c, bout the "start-up" period for these new codes, as in available res" " ? Mr. Remp sal our department will make sure that we have access to enougQi~f~nical documents ," source guides, and we have consistently been expressingftO,the1City..Manager tha ve been anticipating this change coming and have ,,",,;:. -';:""""':1i~;..:"~i~~ ..::",.-~ ,. . ~ . . aske!!:,ll1,!\t!,,!fiE!y,,~~,~,1ltj o[1,!1.\deration because we are not gOing to have the same effjq!~~9yla'SWi!'lfave!np'a-st. The department is hoping the City Manager and City ,QO:l[~lrwlll reflect this when i mes time to make detenminations on what areas get cut, and w~t'llreas are allowed to retain their staffing levels. ~]fu,ber Buddlngh commented that people who have not taken the time to get educated on . . 'n,!!w codes beforehand, such as developers, architects, and contractors would cause t 'Iem, and these people could basically help City Staff, if they "help themselves". Questio IComments from Presen lib Fire Marshall Justin Gi son: At this tii\'jl1J~Mr. Gipson made his presentation on the adoption of Chapter 15.36 FIRE CODE, on 'oehalf of the Fire Department. He stated that the Fire Department had started preparing and training for these new changes back in March 2007. He stated that the Fire , Code is mostly a "maintenance" Code. Mr. Gipson also stated that another change is that in . the past, Fire Code used to be in articles. This new Fire Code is basically to provide a good level of safety throughout the City, and will be a "culture shift" on how you can build a building today, from "passive construction" to "active fire protection", which has a heave reliance on the use of sprinklers and fire alamns. 6-5 Board of Appeals & Advisors Meeting Minutes Page 3 '" Member Flach presented a page of comments and questions: 1. Under Attachment A, Administration 15.06.005, are we a And who determines? Mr. EI-Khazen responded, yes, se adopted and the Building Official usually makes th appendices to adopt. . . 2. Under 15.06.035, how is the need for an inspecti ~. termined? Mr. Remp s _ the City has the Fire Department that cond outine inspections and b Enforcement also receives complaints of bu ithout a permit that triggers need for inspections. These are ways w ,. ihese determinations. 3. Under 15.06.045, does this Board hll authority to request an independent technical study for a proposed ma. method? Or does 15.06.050 override? Mr. Remp said yes, the City doe e authority. The..r6'il~gives us this ability. 4. Under 15.06.060, paragraph Ef violations discqy~? Is there a section that covers occupancy require ~ should it ,~enCed? Mr. EI-Khazen said Code Enforcement discovers t . of""" ofk that gets discovered are Building Without Permit violations. M "oit the Fire Department also performs Inspections and discovers thes' ake referrals to the Building Department if needed, Mr. Remp stated i1ding Code is primarily about building it corr~!..and Fire Code is about ma it. 5. Under 15.06.08Ql:jiJ1f (!!ph 1 P, does 35 feet re d level or from supporting structure? ~t;I!'$~il1 ','- 'f\.o.m grade level. 6. Under 15.06.085f.~s a m.d- . ner (ex: Interior De ,acceptable rather than an A or E? M~BWmp stiil~'d'''' .~'ite:ilaw defines the 1l~:6f buildings that must ""'":'...."y". ~ ~... ..-....:. be designed bY'i\mq"!!'sed archite !Q'eer. . 'iY 7. Under Attachmerit"B\>iAdministra ,0 ' .-" .y~d about a potential confiict between the Buildlfi't;CJ;lde an Jra C'o " . '. p clarified that the provision only existed in the B.u~~Qg S, 8~'U~der 15.08.100, dci'eS'JSte:L.. . ement to screen rooftop structures include single- '~[ljll~,!eSide~ts? For'~~!JmJe; cooling equip~ent, dish antennas, t~wers, ~tc.? Mr. EI''Kliazen said that yes,thls;does apply to reSidents. There are certain reqUirements arfdkP:~i;mlts for particJ'lll'f,1IfElms, some: require permits, and some do not. Our depiiitffl:ent can address 'l1i~il" 9. Und,er;1:$.08.020 and 15.0il:iQ~Q\does this revision mean that there is no more Board ofo'APR'eals? Mr. EI-Khazei11saiCl,Jhat these 2 chapters are addressing moving our ,Ad'-mislrative.f,lrovisions; thewTfave been moved to 15.06.070. ."~':",,'- '"':'o~,,":'i-_'i"-W~,,"t:;; t,;-' . . . 10 l,I!;!,C.'l'1l '. 15\~e9.15 of the Fire Code, Will co~t recovery Include r~scue op ?"'''o.. Jar-failing off a cliff, lockout aSSistance, etc.? Mr. Gipson said there is no cosf . false fire alarms or nuisance alarms, so no cost recovery is done, only for "gross negligence" situations, where a person places other people in harms way. Under 15.08.055, will additional hydrants be added if an existing area does not meet .the hydrant spacing requirements? Mr. Gipson said that Fire Department oniy does ifi!s, on a "reactionary basis". For the older neighborhoods, everything will be left the "'.a-fii~; for new development hydrants will be installed "as required". (He gave the 'e1<ample of the vacant lot on the comer of Anita St. and Fifth Ave.) Member TU'iiler asked for a brief summary of the departments Plan Review Process. Mr. EI, Khazen answered and described the process. Octob~~.2007 ~~ 4;;i;.~~.("'" 4. CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS/REPORTS AND MEMBERS COMMENTS: uddingh) (7-0) to move forward to recommend to City Council to adopt the 2007 California Building Codes as amended. (7-0) motion to City Council on investigation into Board of Appeals liability 6-6 - ~~'----~~~~--------..----- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING CHAPTER 15.06, ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL BUILDING CODES, TO THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City ofChula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That Chapter 15.06 is added to the Chula Vista Municipal Code and reads as follows: Sections: Section 15.06.001 Section 15.06.005 Section 15.06.010 Section 15.06.015 Section 15.06.020 Section 15.06.025 Section 15.06.030 Section 15.06.035 Section 15.06.040 Section 15.06.045 Section 15.06.050 Section 15.06.055 Section 15.06.060 Section 15.06.065 Section 15.06.070 Section 15.06.075 Section 15.06.080 Section 15.06.085 Section 15.06.090 Section 15.06.095 Section 15.06.100 Section 15.06.105 Section 15.06.110 Section 15.06.115 Chapter 15.06 Administrative Provisions for the Technical Building Codes Purpose Scope Applicable Codes Definitions Conflicting Provisions Existing Installations Existing Occupancy Maintenance Temporary Structures and Uses Alternate Materials, Methods of Design and Methods of Construction Tests Authority Powers and Duties of the building official Unsafe Buildings, Structures or Building Equipment Board of Appeals and Advisors Violations Permits Application for a Permit Permit Issuance Fees Inspections Compliance Survey Inspection Connection to Utilities Certificate of Occupancy Section 15.06.001 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to provide for the administration and enforcement of the technical codes listed under Section 15.06.010. H:\BLD _H50\2oo7 Codes AdoptionlFinaJ Draft\Te<:hnical Bldg Codes - Cbapter IS.061.do<: Revised: 10/24/2007 at 11 :30 a.m. 6-7 Ordinance No. Page 2 Section 15.06.005 Scope The provisions of this Chapter shall serve as the administrative, organizational and enforcement rules and regulations for the technical codes listed under Section 15.06.010 which regulate site preparation and construction, location, alteration, moving, demolition, repair, use and occupancy of buildings, structures, and building service equipment. Provisions contained in the appendices of the technical codes shall not apply unless specifically adopted by the City of Chula Vista. Section 15.06.010 Applicable Codes The following technical codes are adopted by the city of Chula Vista: A. The 2007 California Building Code with local amendments (Chapter 15.08 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code). B. The 2007 California Mechanical Code (Chapter 15.16 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code). C. The 2007 California Plumbing Code (Chapter 15.28 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code). D. The 2007 California Electrical Code with local amendments (Chapter 15.24 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code). E. The 2005 California Energy Code with local amendments (Chapter 15.26 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code). F. The 2007 California Referenced Standards Code (Chapter 15.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code) Section 15.06.015 Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter, and Chapters 15.08, 15.10, 15.16, 15.24, 15.26, and 15.28, the following words have the meanings shown in this section. Where a term is not defined in this section, but is defmed in one of the technical codes, such term shall have the meaning ascribed to in the technical code. Where terms are not defined, they shall have their ordinarily accepted meanings within the context with which they are used. Words used in the singular include the plural, and the plural the singular. Words used in the masculine gender include the feminine, and the feminine include the masculine. "Addition" means an extension or increase in floor area or height of a building or structure. "Alter or Alteration" means a change or modification in construction or building service equipment. H:\BLD _HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\Te<:hnical Bldg Codes - Chapter 15,061.doc Revised: I I/O 1/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-8 Ordinance No. Page 3 "Approved, as to materials, types of construction, equipment and systems" means approval by the building official as the result of investigation and tests conducted by the building official, or by reason of accepted principles or tests by recognized authorities, technical or scientific organizations. "Approved Agency" means an established and recognized agency regularly engaged in conducting tests or furnishing inspection services, when the agency has been approved by the building official. "Building" means a structure used or intended for supporting or sheltering a use or occupancy. "Building Code" means the California Building Code, as adopted and amended by the city in Chapter 15.08 of the Municipal Code. "Building, Existing" means a building erected prior to the adoption of this chapter and the adoption of the technical codes, or one for which a legal building permit has been issued. "Building Official" means the officer or other designated authority charged with the administration and enforcement of this code and the technical codes, or duly authorized representative. The Building Official for the City of Chula Vista is the Assistant Director of Planning and Building overseeing the Building Division. "Building Service Equipment" means the plumbing, mechanical and electrical equipment including piping, wiring, fixtures and other accessories which provide sanitation, lighting, heating, ventilation, cooling, refrigeration and fue-fighting that is essential to the occupancy of the building or structure for its designated use. "Electrical Code" means the California Electrical Code, as adopted and amended by the city in Chapter 15.24 the Municipal Code. "Listed and Listing" means equipment and materials included in a list published by an approved testing laboratory, inspection agency, or other organization concerned with product evaluation that maintains periodic inspection of current productions of listed equipment or materials than states that the material or equipment complies with approved nationally recognized codes, standards or tests and has been tested or evaluated and found suitable for use in a specified manner. "Mechanical Code" means the California Mechanical Code, as adopted and amended by the city in Chapter 15.16 of the Municipal Code. "Occupancy" means the purpose for which a building, or part thereof, is used or intended to be used. H:\BLD _HSG\2007 Codes Adopticn\Flnal DT1I.ft\T~hnical Bldg Codes - Chapter 1 S.061.doc Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-9 Ordinance No. Page 4 "Owner" means any person, agent, firm or corporation having a legal or equitable interest in the property. "Permit" means an official document or certificate issued by the building official authorizing performance of a specified activity. "Person" means a natural person, heirs, executors, administrators or assigns, and also includes a firm, partnership or corporation, its or their successors or assigns or the agent of any of the above. "Plumbing Code" means the California Plumbing Code, as adopted and amended by the city in Chapter 15.28 the Municipal Code. "Repair" means the reconstruction or renewal of any part of an existing building, structure or building service equipment for the purpose of its maintenance. "Structure" means that which is built or constructed, an edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner. "Technical codes" means those codes listed in Section 15.06.010. "Valuation or Value", as applied to a building and its building service equipment, means the estimated cost to replace the building and its building service equipment in kind, based on current replacement costs. Section 15.06.020 Conflicting Provisions When conflicting provisions or requirements occur between this chapter, the technical codes and other codes or laws, the most restrictive shall govern. When conflicts occur between the technical codes, those provisions providing the greater safety to life shall govern. In other conflicts where sanitation, life safety or fire safety are not involved, the most restrictive provisions shall govern. Where in a specific case different sections of the technical codes specify different materials, methods of construction or other requirements, the most restrictive shall govern. When there is a conflict between a general requirement and a specific requirement, the specific requirement shall be applicable. When conflicts occur between specific provisions of this chapter and administrative provisions in a technical code, those conflicts shall be resolved in favor of this chapter, which shall be prevailing. H:\8LD _HSG\2007 COOell Adoption\Final Draft\TeehnieaJ 81dg Codes _ Chapter 15.061.doc Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-10 Ordinance No. Page 5 Section 15.06.025 Existing Installations Building service equipment lawfully in existence at the time of the adoption of the technical codes may have their use, maintenance or repair continued if the use, maintenance or repair is in accordance with the original design and a hazard to life, health or property has not been created by such building service equipment. Section 15.06.030 Existing Occupancy Buildings in existence at the time of the adoption of the Building Code may have their existing use or occupancy continued if the use or occupancy was legal at the time of the adoption of the Building Code, and provided continued use is not dangerous to life, health and safety. A change in the use or occupancy of any existing building or structure shall comply with the provisions of Section 15.06.115 and the Building Code. Section 15.06.035 Maintenance Buildings, structures and building service equipment, existing and new, and parts thereof shall be maintained in a safe and sanitary condition. Devices or safeguards, which are required by the technical codes, shall be maintained in conformance with the technical code under which the device or safeguard was installed. The owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of buildings, structures and their building service equipment. To determine compliance with this section, the building official may cause a structure to be reinspected. Section 15.06.040 Temporary Structures and Uses A. General. The building official is authorized to issue a permit for temporary structures and temporary uses. Such permits shall be limited as to time of service, but shall not be permitted for more than 180 days. The building official is authorized to grant extensions for demonstrated cause. B. Conformance. Temporary structures and uses shall conform to the structural strength, fire safety, means of egress, accessibility, light, ventilation and sanitary requirements of the technical codes as necessary to ensure public health, safety and general welfare. C. Temporary power. The building official is authorized to give perrmSSlOn to temporarily supply and use power in part of an electric installation before such installation has been fully completed and the final certificate of completion has been issued. The part covered by the temporary certificate shall comply with the requirements specified for temporary lighting, heat or power in the Electrical Code. D. Termination of approval. The building official is authorized to terminate a permit for a temporary structure or use and to order the temporary structure or use to be discontinued. H:\BLD H50\2007 Codes AdoptionlFtnal Draft\Technical Bldg Codes - Chapte.- 15,061 ,doc Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-11 Ordinance No. Page 6 Section 15.06.045 Alternate Materials, Methods of Design and Methods of Construction The provisions of the technical codes are not intended to prevent the use of any material, method of design or method of construction not specifically prescribed by the technical codes, provided an alternate has been approved and its use authorized by the building official. The building official may approve an alternate, provided the building official finds that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies with the provisions of the technical codes and that the material, method or work offered is, for the purpose intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in the technical codes in suitability, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability, safety and sanitation. The building official may require documentation necessary to make findings for approval. The details of an action granting approval of an alternate shall be recorded and entered in the files of the Building Division. For purposes of this section, the code development and product approval and listing processes utilized by the model code groups are deemed sufficient to make the required findings related to case-by-case approvals of alternate materials and methods of design and construction. Section 15.06.050 Tests Whenever, in the opinion of the building official, there is insufficient evidence of compliance with the provisions of the technical codes or evidence that materials or construction do not conform to the requirements of the technical codes, the building official may require tests as evidence of compliance to be made at no expense to the city. Test methods shall be as specified by the technical codes or by other recognized test standards. In the absence of recognized and accepted test methods, the building official shall determine test procedures. Tests shall be made by an approved agency. Reports of such tests shall be retained by the building official for the period required for the retention of public records. Section 15.06.055 Authority There is hereby established a building code enforcement agency which shall be under the administrative and operational control of the building official. Whenever the term or title "administrative authority," "responsible official," "building official," "chief inspector," or other similar designation is used in any of the technical codes, it means the building official. Section 15.06.060 Powers and Duties of the building official A. The building official is authorized and directed to enforce all the provisions of this chapter and the technical codes. For such purposes, the building official shall have the powers of a law enforcement officer. The building official shall have the power to H:\8r..o _HSG\2007 Code$ Adopdon\Final Draft\Technica.l Bldg Codes _ Chapter 15.061 doc Revised: 11/01/200712:02:45 PM 6-12 Ordinance No. Page 7 render interpretations of this chapter and the technical codes, and to adopt and enforce rules and regulations supplemental to this chapter and the technical codes as may be deemed necessary to clarify the application of the provisions of this chapter. Such interpretations, rules and regulations shall be in conformity with the intent and purpose of this chapter and the technical codes. B. Deputies. The building official may appoint such number of technical officers and inspectors and other employees as necessary. The building official may deputize such inspectors or employees as may be necessary to carry out the functions of the building code enforcement agency. C. Right of entry. When necessary to make an inspection to enforce any of the provisions of this chapter and the technical codes, or when the building official has reasonable cause to believe that there exists in any building or upon a premises a condition which is contrary to or in violation of this code or the technical codes which makes the building or premises unsafe, dangerous or hazardous, the building official may enter the building or premises at all reasonable times to inspect or to perform the duties imposed by this chapter, provided that if such building or premises be occupied, that credentials be presented to the occupant and entry requested. If such building or premises be unoccupied, the building official shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other persons having charge or control of the building or premises and request entry. Should entry be refused, the building official shall have recourse to the remedies provided by law to secure entry. D. Stop orders. When work is being done contrary to the provisions of this chapter, the technical codes, or other pertinent laws or ordinances, the building official may order the work stopped by notice in writing served on persons engaged in the doing or causing such work to be done, and such persons shall stop the work immediately until authorized by the building official to proceed with the work. E. Occupancy violations. When a building or structure or building service equipment regulated by this chapter and the technical codes is being used contrary to the provisions of this chapter and the technical codes, the building official may order such use discontinued by written notice served on any person causing such use to be continued. Such person shall discontinue the use within the time prescribed by the building official after receipt of such notice to make the structure, or portion thereof, comply with the requirements of this chapter and the technical codes. F. Authority to Disconnect Utilities. The building official shall have the authority to disconnect a utility service or energy supplied to the building, structure or building service equipment regulated by this chapter or the technical codes in case of emergency where necessary to eliminate an immediate hazard to life or property. The building official shall, whenever possible, notify the serving utility, the owner and occupant of the building, structure or building service equipment of the decision to H:\BLD H5G\2oo7 Codes Adoption\Final Onft\Technical Bldg Codes - Chapter 15.061.doc Revised: 11/0112007 12:02:45 PM 6-13 Ordinance No. Page 8 disconnect prior to taking such action, and shall notify such serving utility, owner and occupant of the building, structure or building service equipment, in writing, of such disconnection immediately thereafter. G. Authority to remove building service equipment. I. When the building official ascertains that building service equipment regulated in the technical codes has become hazardous to life, health or property, or has become unsanitary, the building official shall order in writing that such equipment either be removed or restored to a safe or sanitary condition, as appropriate. The written notice shall fix a time limit for compliance with the order. Defective building service equipment shall not be maintained after receiving such notice. 2. When such equipment or installation is to be disconnected, a written notice of disconnection and causes therefore shall be given within twenty-four (24) hours to the serving utility, the owner and occupant of such building, structure or premises. 3. When any building service equipment is maintained in violation of the technical codes and in violation of a notice issued pursuant to the provisions of this section, the building official shall institute appropriate action to prevent, restrain, correct or abate the violation. H. Connection after order to disconnect. A person shall not make connections from an energy, fuel or power supply nor supply energy or fuel to building service equipment which has been disconnected or ordered to be disconnected by the building official or the use of which has been ordered to be discontinued by the building official until the building official authorizes the reconnection and use of such equipment. 1. Liability. The building official charged with the enforcement of this chapter and the technical codes, acting in good faith and without malice in the discharge of his duties, shall not be rendered personally liable for damage that may accrue to persons or property as a result of an act or omission in the discharge of the assigned duties. A suit brought against the building official or employee because of such act or omission performed by the building official or employee in the enforcement of the provisions of this chapter and the technical codes or other pertinent laws or ordinances shall be defended by the city until final termination of such proceedings, and any judgment resulting there from, shall be assumed by the city. This chapter shall not be construed to relieve from or lessen the responsibility of any person owning, operating or controlling a building, structure or building service equipment for damages to persons or property caused by defects, nor shall the city be held as assuming such liability by reason of the inspections authorized by this chapter H;\BLD _HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\T=chnical Bldg Codes _ Chapter 15.06] .doc Revised: 1110112007 12:02:45 PM 6-14 Ordinance No. Page 9 and the technical codes or permits or certificates issued under this chapter and the technical codes. J. Modifications. When there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this chapter and the technical codes, the building official may grant modifications for individual cases. The building official must first find that a special individual reason makes the strict letter of this chapter and the technical codes impractical and that the modification is in conformance with the intent and purpose of this chapter and the technical codes and that such modification does not lessen any fire-protection requirements or any degree of structural integrity. The details of any action granting modifications shall be recorded and entered in the files of the Building Division. K. Cooperation of other officials and officers. The building official may request, and shall receive, the assistance and cooperation of other officials and employees so far as is required in the discharge of the duties required by this chapter, the technical codes or other city pertinent laws or ordinances. Section 15.06.065 Unsafe Buildings, Structures or Building Service Equipment A. Buildings or structures regulated by this chapter and the technical codes which are structurally inadequate or have inadequate egress, or which constitute a fire hazard, or are otherwise dangerous to human life are unsafe buildings. B. Building service equipment regulated by this chapter and the technical codes, which constitutes a fire, electrical or health hazard, or an unsanitary condition, or is otherwise dangerous to human life, is unsafe. Use of buildings, structures or building service equipment which are a hazard to safety, health or public welfare by reason of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, obsolescence, fire hazard, disaster, damage or abandonment is an unsafe use. C. Parapet walls, cornices, spires, towers, tanks, statuary and other appendages or structural members which are supported by, attached to, or a part of a building and which are in a deteriorated condition or otherwise unable to sustain the design loads which are specified in the Building Code are unsafe building appendages. D. Unsafe buildings, structures or appendages and building service equipment are public nuisances and shall be abated by repair, rehabilitation, demolition or removal in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 15.18. As an alternative, the building official may institute other appropriate action to prevent, restrain, correct or abate the violation. Section 15.06.070 Board of Appeals and Advisors The Board of Appeals and Advisors as established by Chapter 2.26 is hereby designated to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations made by the Building Official H:\BLD_HSQ\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\TechnicaJ Bldg Codes - Chapter IS.06l.doe Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-15 Ordinance No. Page 10 relative to the application and interpretation of the techniclil codes. The Board shall render lill decisions and fmdings in writing to the Building Official and provide a copy to the appellant. The decision of the Board is fmlil. Section 15.06.075 Violations A. Unlawful acts. It shlill be unlawful for any person to erect, construct, lilter, extend, repair, move, remove, demolish or occupy any building, structure or equipment regulated by this chapter and the techniclil codes, or cause same to be done, in conflict with or in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter and the technical codes. B. Notice of violation. The building officilil is authorized to serve a notice of violation or order on the person responsible for the erection, construction, lilteration, extension, repair, moving, removlil, demolition or occupancy of a building or structure in violation of the provisions of this chapter and the techniclil codes, or in violation of a permit or certificate issued under the provisions of this chapter or the techniclil codes. Such notice of violation or order shall direct the discontinuance of the illegal action or condition and the abatement of the violation. C. Prosecution of violation. If the notice of violation or order is not complied with promptly, the building officilil is authorized to request the City Attorney to institute the appropriate proceeding at law or equity to restrain, correct or abate such violation, or to require the removlil or termination of the unlawful occupancy of the building or structure. D. Violation penalties. Any person who violates a provision of this chapter or the technical codes or fails to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who erects, constructs, lilters or repairs a building or structure in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the building official, or of a permit or certificate issued under the provisions of this chapter and the techniclil codes, shlill be subject to penlilties as prescribed by law. Section 15.06.080 Permits A. Permits Required. Except as specified in subsection B of this Section, no building, structure or building service equipment regulated by this chapter and the techniclil codes shlill be erected, constructed, enlarged, liltered, repaired, moved, improved, removed, converted or demolished unless a separate, appropriate permit for each building, structure or building service equipment has fust been obtained from the building officilil. B. Work Exempt from Permit. A permit shlill not be required for the types of work in each of the separate classes of permit as listed below. Exemption from the permit requirements of this chapter shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work H:\BLD _HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\FinaJ Draft\Tecbnical Bldg Codes - Chapler 15.061.doc Revised: 11101/200712:02:45 PM 6-16 Ordinance No. Page 11 to be done in violation of the provisions of the technical codes or any other laws or ordinances. 1. Building permits. A building permit shall not be required for the following: a. One-story detached accessory buildings, not exceeding twelve feet in height used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses, provided the floor area does not exceed one-hundred forty-four square feet and are located so as to comply with the provisions of Section 19.58.020. b. Detached patio covers, not exceeding twelve feet in height, with a projected roof area not to exceed one-hundred forty-four square feet and located at least six feet from any building or structure on the same property . c. Fences up to seventy-two inches and freestanding masonry walls up to forty-eight inches in height above the highest adjacent grade. d. Oil derricks. e. Movable cases, racks, counters and partitions not over five (5) feet nine (9) inches (1753 rom) high. f. Retaining walls which are not over three feet in height measured from the top of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge or impounding flammable liquids. g. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed five thousand (5,000) gallons (18,925 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2: 1. h. Platforms, walks and driveways not more than thirty (30) inches (762 rom) above grade and not over any basement or story below, and are not part of an accessible route. i. Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops and similar finish work. J. Temporary motion picture, television and theater stage sets and scenery . H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Flnal Draft\Technical Bldg Codes - Cbapter 15.061.doc Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-17 Ordinance No. Page 12 k. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall of Group R, Division 3, and Group U Occupancies when projecting not more than fifty-four (54) inches (1372 mm) from the exterior wall. I. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to a Group R, Division 3 Occupancy that are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep, do not exceed 5000 gallons (18925 L) and are installed entirely above ground. m. Shade cloth structures constructed for nursery or agricultural purposes, not including service systems. n. Swings and other playground equipment accessory to detached one- and two-family dwellings. o. The installation of replacement windows in existing window openings associated with a residential dwelling unit with no modifications to the existing rough opening or to the exterior weather proofing. p. Television and radio antennas less than thirty-five feet in height. q. Fish ponds, reflective pools or other decorative water containers with a wet surface area of one-hundred square feet or less and a maximum depth of eighteen inches to the flood rim. r. Outside paving ofR-3 and U Occupancies parking surfaces. s. Re-roofmg buildings of Group R-3 and U Occupancies of less than five-hundred square feet or less than fifty percent of roof covering replacement. 1. Repairs which involve only the replacement of component parts of existing work with similar materials for the purpose of maintenance and do not affect any electrical, plumbing or mechanical installations. Repairs exempt from permit requirements shall not include any addition, change, or modification in construction, exit facilities, or permanent fixtures or equipment. Unless otherwise exempted by this chapter, separate plumbing, electrical and mechanical permits will be required for the above exempted items. 2. Plumbing permits. A plumbing permit shall not be required for the following: H:\BLD _HSG12007 Codes Adoplion\Final Draft\Teclmical8ldg Cadell _ Chapter] 5.061.doc Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-18 Ordinance No. Page 13 a. The stopping of leaks in drains, soil, waste or vent pipe. However, the removal or replacement of any concealed trap, drain pipe, soil, waste or vent pipe with new material is new work and a permit and inspection is required. b. The clearing of stoppages or the repairing of leaks in pipes, valves or fixtures, or the removal and reinstallation of water closets, provided such repairs do not involve or require the replacement or rearrangement of valves, pipes or fixtures. 3. Electrical permits. An electrical permit shall not be required for the following: a. Portable motors or other portable appliances energized by means of a cord or cable having an attachment plug end to be connected to an approved receptacle when that cord or cable is permitted by the Electrical Code. b. Repair or replacement of fixed motors, transformers or fixed approved appliances of the same type and rating in the same location. c. . Temporary decorative lighting. d. Repair or replacement of current-carrying parts of any switch, contactor or control device. e. Reinstallation of attachment plug receptacles, but not the associated outlets. f. Repair or replacement of any overcurrent device of the required capacity . g. Repair or replacement of electrodes or transformers of the same size and capacity for signs or gas tube systems. h. Taping joints. i. Removal of electrical wiring. j. Temporary wiring for experimental purposes in suitable experimental laboratories. H:IBLD _HSQ\2007 Code3 Adoptiljn\Final Drafl.\Tec:bnieal Bldg Codes - Chapter 15.061.doc Revised: 11/0112007 12:02:45 PM 6-19 Ordinance No. Page 14 k. The wiring for temporary theater; motion picture or television stage sets. 1. Electrical wmng, devices, appliances, apparatus or equipment operating at less than twenty-five (25) volts and not capable of supplying more than fifty (50) watts of energy. m. Low energy power, control and signal circuits of Class II and Class III as defined in the Electrical Code. n. The installation, alteration or repair of electrical wiring, apparatus or equipment or the generation, transmission, distribution or metering of electrical energy or in the operation of signals or the transmission of intelligence by a public or private utility in the exercise of its function as a serving utility. o. Communication circuits per Article 800 of the Electrical Code. 4. Mechanical permits. A mechanical permit shall not be required for the following: a. A portable heating appliance, portable ventilating equipment, portable cooling unit, or a portable evaporative cooler. b. A closed system of steam, hot or chilled water piping within heating or cooling equipment regulated by the Mechanical Code. c. Replacement of any component part of assembly of an appliance which does not alter its original approval and complies with other applicable requirements of the technical codes. d. Refrigerating equipment which is part of the equipment for which a permit has been issued pursuant to the requirements of the technical codes. e. A unit refrigerating system as defmed in the Mechanical Code. Section 15.06.085 Application for a Permit A. Application. To obtain a permit, the applicant shall first file an application in writing on a form furnished by the city for that purpose. Every application shall: I. Identify and describe the work to be covered by the permit for which application is made. H:\BLD _HSG'.2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\Technical Bldg Codes _ Chapter 15.06Ldoc Revised: 11101/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-20 Ordinance No. Page 15 2. Describe the land on which the proposed work is to be done by legal description, street address or similar description that will readily identify and definitely locate the proposed building or work. 3. Indicate the use or occupancy for which the proposed work is intended. 4. Be accompanied by plans, diagrams, computations and specifications, and other data as required in subsection (B) of this Section. 5. State the valuation of any new building or structure or any addition, remodeling or alteration to an existing building. 6. Be signed by the applicant, or the applicant's authorized agent. 7. Give such other data and information as may be required by the building official. B. Submittal Documents. Plans, specifications, engineering calculations, diagrams, soil investigation reports, special inspection and structural observation programs and other data shall constitute the submittal documents and shall be submitted in one or more sets with each application for a permit. When such plans are not prepared by an architect or engineer, the building official may require the applicant submitting such plans or other data to demonstrate that state law does not require that the plans be prepared by a licensed architect or engineer. The building official may require plans, computations and specifications to be prepared and designed by an engineer or architect licensed by the state even if not required by state law. However, the building official may waive the requirement to submit plans, calculations, construction inspection requirements and other data if that the nature of the work applied for is such that reviewing of plans is not necessary to obtain compliance with this chapter. 1. Information on plans and Specifications. Plans and specifications shall be drawn to scale on substantial paper or cloth and shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the location, nature and extent of the proposed work and show in detail that the proposed work will conform to the provisions of this chapter, the technical codes and all relevant laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. Plans for buildings of other than Group R, Division 3 and Group U Occupancies shall indicate how required structural and fire-resistive integrity will be maintained where penetrations will be made for electrical, mechanical, plumbing and communication conduits, pipes and similar systems. 2. Architect or Engineer of Record. When it is required that documents be prepared by an architect or engineer, the building official may require the applicant to engage and designate on the building permit application an architect or engineer who shall act as the architect or engineer of record. If the H:\BLD HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\PinaJ Draft\Teehnical Bldg Codes - Chapter IS.06l.doc Revised: 11/01/200712:02:45 PM 6-21 Ordinance No. Page 16 circumstances require, the applicant may designate a substitute architect or engineer of record who shall perform all the duties required of the original architect or engineer of record. The applicant shall notify the building official in writing if the architect or engineer of record is changed or is unable to continue to perform the duties. The architect or engineer of record shall be responsible for reviewing and coordinating all submittal documents prepared by others, including deferred submittal items, for compatibility with the design of the building. 3. Deferred Submittals. Deferred submittals are defined as those portions of the design which are not submitted at the time of the application and which are to be submitted to the building official within a specified period. Deferred submittals shall have prior approval of the building official. The architect or engineer of record shall list the deferred submittals on the plans at time of application and shall submit the deferred submittal documents for review by the building official. The architect or engineer of record shall submit the deferred submittals to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittals have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building. The deferred submittal items shall not be installed until their design and deferred submittals have been approved by the building official. c. Expiration of Plan Review. Applications for which no permit is issued within one hundred eighty (180) days following the date of application shall expire, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days on written request by the applicant showing that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action from being taken. An application shall not be extended more than once. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee. Section 15.06.090 Permit Issuance A. Issuance. The application, plans, specifications, computations and other data filed by an applicant for permit shall be reviewed by the building official. Such plans may be reviewed by other departments of the city to verify compliance with all applicable laws. If the building official finds that the work described in an application for a permit and the plans, specifications and other data filed therewith conform to the requirements of this chapter, the technical codes, and other pertinent laws and ordinances, and that the fees specified in Section 15.06.095 have been paid, the building official shall issue a permit to the applicant. H;\BLD _HSG\2007 Code! Adoption\Final Draft\Teehnic:al Bldg Codes _ Chapter IS,061.doc Revised: 1110112007 12:02:45 PM 6-22 Ordinance No. Page 17 When a permit is issued, and plans and specifications are required for that permit, the building official shall endorse in writing or stamp the plans and specifications APPROVED. Such approved plans and specifications shall not be changed, modified or altered without authorization from the building official, and all work regulated by this chapter or the technical codes shall be done in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The building official may issue a permit for the construction of part of a building, structure or building service equipment before the entire plans and specifications for the whole building, structure or building service equipment have been submitted or approved, provided adequate information and detailed statements have been filed complying with all pertinent requirements of the technical codes. The issuance of a partial permit shall not, in any way, commit the building official to grant a permit for the entire building, structure or building service will be granted. B. Retention of Plans. The building official shall maintain an official copy, microfilm, electronic or other type of photographic copy of the plans of every building, during the life of the building, for which the City issued a building permit. All plans for common interest developments as defined in Section 1351 of the California Civil Code shall be maintained with the following exceptions: 1. Single or multiple dwellings not more than two stories and basement in height. 2. Garages and other structures appurtenant to buildings listed in Exception (a) above. 3. Farm or ranch buildings. 4. Anyone-story building where the span between bearing walls does not exceed 25 feet, except a steel frame or concrete building. C. Validity of Permit. The issuance of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter or the technical codes, or of any other ordinance of the city. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this Chapter, the technical codes, or of other ordinances of the City shall not be valid. The issuance of a permit based on plans, specifications and other data shall not prevent the building official from thereafter requiring the correction of errors in these plans, specifications and other data, or prevent the building official from stopping building operations when there is a violation of these plans, specifications and other data, or violations of this Chapter or the technical codes, or of any other ordinances. D. Expiration of Permit. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of the technical codes shall expire, if the building or work authorized by H:\BLD _HSQ\2007 Codes AdoptionlFinal Draft\Teehnieal Bldg Cod= - Chapter IS.06I.dcx: Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-23 Ordinance No. Page 18 such permit is not commenced within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit shall be first obtained to do so, and the fee shall be one half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided no changes have been made or will be made in the original plans and specifications for such work; and provided that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. In order to renew action on a permit after expiration, the permittee shall pay a new full permit fee. A permittee holding an unexpired permit may apply for an extension of the time within which work may commence under that permit when the permittee is unable to commence work within the time required by this section for good and satisfactory reasons. The building official may extend the time for action by the permittee for a period not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days upon written request by the permittee showing that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented action from being taken. Permits shall not be extended more than once. E. Suspension or Revocation. The building official may, in writing, suspend or revoke a permit issued under the provisions of this Chapter and the technical codes when the permit is issued in error or on the basis of incorrect information supplied, or in violation of this Chapter, the technical codes or any other ordinance or regulation. Section 15.06.095 Fees A. General. Fees shall be assessed in accordance with the provisions of this section or as set forth in the fee schedule adopted by the City. B. Permit Fees. The fee for each permit shall be as specified in the Master Fee Schedule of the City ofChula Vista. The determination of value or valuation shall be made by the building official and shall be based on the total value of all construction work for which the permit is issued as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air- conditioning, elevators, fire-extinguishing systems and other permanent equipment. C. Plan Review Fees. When submittal documents are required by Section 15.06.085(B), the applicant shall pay a plan review fee at the time of submitting the submittal documents for plan review. The plan review fee shall be as specified in the Master Fee Schedule of the City of Chula Vista. The plan review fees are separate fees from the permit fees and are in addition to the permit fees. When submittal documents are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan review or when the project involves deferred submittals as defined in Section 15.06.085(B)(3), an additional plan H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Code! Adopcion\FinaJ Draft\Technical Bldg COOell_ Chaplet lS.06l.doc Revised: 1110112007 12:02:45 PM 6-24 Ordinance No. Page 19 review fee shall be charged. This additional plan review fee shall be as specified in the Master Fee schedule of the City of Chula Vista. D. Investigation Fees: Work Without a Permit. 1. Investigation. Whenever work for which a permit is required by this Chapter or the technical codes has been commenced without first obtaining a permit, the building official may make a special investigation before a permit may be issued for such work. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee pursuant to this section. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt an applicant from compliance with all other provisions of this Chapter, the technical codes, or from the penalty prescribed by law. However, the building official may waive the investigation fee if the building official finds that such work was urgently necessary and it was not practical to obtain a permit before commencement of the work. In all such cases, a permit must be obtained as soon as it is practical to do so. If there is an unreasonable delay in obtaining such permit, the investigation fee shall be charged. 2. Fee Refunds. The building official may authorize refunding of a fee paid pursuant to this section which was erroneously paid or collected. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than eighty (80) percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this Chapter and the technical codes. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than eighty (80) percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any examination time has been expended. The building official shall not authorize the refunding of any fee paid except upon written application filed by the original permittee or applicant not later than one hundred eighty (180) days after the date of fee payment. Section 15.06.100 Inspections A. General. Construction or work for which a permit is required shall be subject to inspection by the building official, and the construction or work shall remain accessible and exposed for inspection purposes until approved by the building official. In addition, certain types of construction shall have special inspection as specified in Chapter 17 of the Building Code. Approval as a result of an inspection shall not be construed to be an approval of a violation of the provisions of this Chapter, the technical codes, or of other City H:\BLD _HSG\2007 Codes AdQption\Fin.sJ Draft\Tcclmieal Bldg Codes - Chapter 15.06Ldoc Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-25 Ordinance No. Page 20 ordinances. Inspections presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this Chapter, the technical codes, or of other City ordinances shall not be valid. The applicant shall cause the construction or work to remain accessible and exposed for inspection purposes until approved by the building official. Neither the building official nor the City shall be liable for expense entailed in the removal or replacement of any material required to allow inspection. The building official may require a survey of the lot to verify that the structure is located in accordance with the approved plans. B. Inspection Record Card. Work requiring a permit shall not be commenced until the permittee or the agent of the permittee has posted or otherwise made available an inspection record card to allow the building official conveniently to make the required entries thereon regarding inspection of the work. The permittee shall maintain this card available until fmal approval has been granted by the building official. C. Inspection Requests. It shall be the duty of the person doing the work authorized by a permit to notify the building official that such work is ready for inspection. The building official may require that every request for inspection be filed at least one working day before such inspection is desired. Such request may be in writing, by telephone or other means at the option of the building official. It shall be the duty of the person requesting any inspections required either by this Chapter or the technical codes to provide access to and means for inspection of the work. D. Approval Required. Work shall not be done beyond the point indicated in each successive inspection without fust obtaining the approval of the building official. The building official, upon notification, shall make the requested inspections and shall either indicate that that portion of the construction is satisfactory as completed or shall notify the permittee or an agent of the permittee that that portion of the construction fails to comply with this Chapter or the technical codes. Any portions which do not comply shall be corrected and such portion shall not be covered or concealed until authorized by the building official. There shall be a fmal inspection and approval of all buildings and structures when completed and ready for occupancy and use. E. Required Inspections. All plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems for which a permit is required by this Chapter or the technical codes, shall be inspected by the H;IBLD _HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final OI1lft\Technic::al Bldg Codes _ Chapter 15.06l.dac Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-26 Ordinance No. Page 21 building official. No portion of these systems shall be concealed until inspected and approved. All technical code required testing of these systems shall be inspected and approved. All reinforcing steel and the structural framework of a building or structure shall not be covered or concealed without first obtaining the inspection and approval of the building official. Protection of joints and penetrations in fue-resistive assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected and approved by the building official. The building official, upon notification, shall make the following inspections: a. Underground inspection. To be made after all underground plumbing systems, electrical conduits and mechanical systems are in place and prior to backfill and concrete. All systems are to be under the applicable test as required by code. b. Foundation inspection. To be made after excavations for footings are complete and required reinforcing steel and other required structural hardware is in place. For concrete foundations, required forms shall be in place prior to inspection. All materials for the foundation shall be on the job, except when concrete is ready-mixed in accordance with approved nationally recognized standards, the concrete need not be on the job site. When the foundation is to be constructed of approved treated wood, additional inspections may be required by the building official. c. Concrete slab or under-floor inspection. To be made after in-slab or under-floor building service equipment, conduit, piping accessories and other ancillary equipment items are in place but before any concrete is placed or floor sheathing installed, including the subfloor. d. Roof and/or floor. To be made after all framing and structural systems are complete for the floor and roof systems. No floor or roof covering is to be installed prior to this inspection and approval. e. Frame inspection. To be made after the roof covering, framing, all structural systems, fue blocking and bracing are in place and all pipes, chimneys and vents are complete and the rough electrical, plumbing, and mechanical cables, pipes, and ducts are installed and are under the code required tests, as applicable. H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\Technical Bldg Cadell - Chapter] 5.061 ,doc Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-27 Ordinance No. Page 22 f. Lath and/or wallboard inspection. To be made after lathing and wallboard, interior and exterior, is in place but before plaster is applied or before wallboard joints and fasteners are taped and finished. The testing of gas piping systems is to be inspected at this time. g. Final inspection. To be made after all work required by the building permit is complete. F. Required Building Service Equipment Inspections. 1. General. Building service equipment for which a permit is required by this Chapter and the technical code shall be inspected by the building official. Building service equipment intended to be concealed by a permanent portion of the building shall not be concealed until inspected and approved. When the installation of building service equipment is complete, an additional and final inspection shall be made. Building service equipment regulated by the technical codes shall not be connected to the water, fuel or power supply, or sewer system until authorized by the building official. 2. Operation of Building Service Equipment. The requirements of this section shall not be considered to prohibit the operation of building service equipment installed to replace existing building service equipment serving an occupied portion of the building in the event a request for inspection of such building service equipment has been filed with the building official not more than forty-eight (48) hours after the replacement work is completed, and before any portion of such building service equipment is concealed by permanent portions of the building. G. Other Inspections. In addition to the called inspections specified above, the building official may make or require other inspections of construction work to ascertain compliance with the provisions of this Chapter or the technical codes and other laws which are enforced by the City. H. Special Inspection and Structural Observation. For special inspection and structural observation, see Chapter 17 of the Building Code. 1. Reinspections. A reinspection fee may be assessed in the following circumstances: I) for each inspection or reinspection when such portion of work for which inspection is called is not complete or when corrections called for are not made; 2) when the inspection record card is not posted or otherwise available on the work site; 3) when the approved plans are not readily available to the inspector; 4) for failure to provide access on the date for which inspection is requested; 5) or for deviating from plans requiring the approval of the building official. H;\BLD_HSGI2007 Codes Adoplion\Final Draft\TechnicaJ BIds: Codes_ Chaptel" 15.061.dlJe Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-28 Ordinance No. Page 23 This section is not to be interpreted as requiring reinspection fees the first time a job is rejected for failure to comply with the requirements of the technical codes, but as controlling the practice of calling for inspections before the job is ready for such inspection or reinspection. The applicant shall pay the reinspection fee as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule of the City of Chula Vista before requesting a reinspection. The building official shall not conduct a reinspection of the work will until the required fees have been paid. Section 15.06.105 Compliance Survey Inspection Upon receipt of a written request for a compliance survey from the owner and payment of the fee specified in the Master Fee Schedule of the City of Chula Vista, the building official may inspect an existing structure to ascertain its compliance with the provisions of this Chapter, the technical codes, and other applicable laws and ordinances, and report findings in writing to the owner. Section 15.06.110 Connection to Utilities A. Energy Connections. Persons shall not make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to building service equipment which is regulated by the technical codes and for which a permit is required by this code, until approved by the building official. B. Temporary Connections. The building official may authorize the temporary connection of the building service equipment to the source of energy, fuel or power for the purpose of testing building service equipment, or for use under a temporary certificate of occupancy. The building official shall coordinate the approval of a temporary connection with all other applicable city departments. Section 15.06.115 Certificate of Occupancy A. Use or Occupancy. Buildings or structures shall not be used or occupied nor shall a change in the existing occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof be made until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy. However, this subsection does not apply to Group R, Division 3, and Group U Occupancies. Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as an approval of a violation of the provisions of this Chapter, the technical codes, or of other City ordinances. Certificates presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this Chapter, the technical codes, or of other City ordinances, shall not be valid. B. Change in Use. Changes in the character or use of a building shall not be made except as specified in the Building Code. H:\BLD HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\Te<:hnical aldg Codes - Chapter 15.061.doc Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-29 Ordinance No. Page 24 C. Certificate Issued. After the building official inspects the building or structure and fmds no violations of the provisions of this Chapter, the technical codes, or other laws which are enforced by the City, and after the building official receives approvals from the public works and planning departments for completion of all required improvements, zoning code compliance and all other project conditions of approval, the building official shall issue a certificate of occupancy which shall contain the following: 1. The building permit number. 2. The address of the building. 3. The name and address of the owner. 4. A description of that portion of the building for which the certificate is issued. 5. A statement that the described portion of the building has been inspected for compliance with the requirements of this Chapter and the technical codes for the group and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed occupancy is classified. 6. The name of the building official. D. Temporary Certificate. If the building official finds that substantial hazard will not result from occupancy of a building or portion thereof before the same is completed, a temporary certificate of occupancy for the use of a portion or portions of a building or structure may be issued prior to the completion of the entire building or structure. The building official shall coordinate the issuance of a temporary certificate with all applicable city departments. E. Posting. The certificate of occupancy shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the premises and shall not be removed except by the building official. F. Revocation. The building official may, in writing, suspend or revoke a certificate of occupancy issued under the provisions of this Chapter and the technical codes when the certificate is issued in error, or on the basis of incorrect information, or when it is determined that the building or structure or portion thereof is in violation this Chapter, the technical codes, or of other City ordinances. H:\BLD _HS012007 Codes AdoplionlFinll Draft\Techni<:a1 Bldg Codes _ Chapter 15.061.doc Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-30 Ordinance No. Page 25 SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance will take effect and be in force thirty days after final passage. Submitted by: Approved as to form by '-!-b~) tL_~rr- Ann Moore City Attorney James Sandoval Director of Planning & Building Brad Remp, C.B.O. Assistant Director/Building Official H:\BLD _HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\Ttchnical Bldg Codes - Chapter 15.06l.doc Revised: 11/01/2007 12:02:45 PM 6-31 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 2007 EDITION The City Council of the City ofChula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION I. That Chapter 15.08 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Chapter 15.08 BUILDING CODE Sections: 15.08.010 15.08.070 15.08.080 California Building Code, 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. Subsection 704.11 is amended to add an exception to the requirement for parapets. Subsection 903.2 is amended to require installation of automatic fire- extinguishing system in buildings greater than celiain height. Subsection 1509.6 is added to Section 1509 to require equipment enclosures on roofs. 15.08.100 15.08.010 California Building Code, 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. There is hereby adopted by reference the Califomia Building Code, 2007 Edition, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 pati 2, including Appendix C and Appendix 1 of that document as copYlighted by the International Code Council, and the California Building Standards Commission. Said document is hereby adopted as the Building Code of the City of Chula Vista for regulating the erection, construction. enlargement, alteration, repair, moving, demolition, conversion, occupancy, use, height, and area of all buildings and structures in the City, excepting such portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified, or amended. Municipal Code Chapter 15.06 shall serve as the administrative, organizational and enforcement rules and regulations for this Chapter. 15.08.070 Subsection 704.11 is amended to add an exception to the requirement for parapets. Exception 7 is hereby added to Subsection 704.11 of the California Building Code, as it applies in Chula Vista, and shall read as follows: Exception 7. Conversion of existing Group R occupancies to offices. 15.08.080 Subsection 903.2 is amended to require installation of automatic fire- extinguishing system in buildings greater than certain height. Subsection 903.2 of the Califomia Building Code is hereby amended, as it applies in Chula Vista, by the addition of the following: 6-32 Ordinance No. Page 2 In every building regardless of occupancy, group or type of construction, when such building is more than f011y feet or tour stories or more in height. 15.08.100 Subsection 1509.6 is added to Section 1509 to require equipment enclosUl"es on roofs. Subsection 1509.6 is hereby added to Section 1509 of the California BLlilding Code. as it applies in Chula Vista, and shall read as follows: Subsection 1509.6 Equipment Enclosure. Operating equipment, including piping and ducts located on the roof of a building, shall be shielded from view from public thoroughfares. and private and public parking lots. Equipment enclosures shall not be constructed so as to trap flammable or combustible vapors. Exception: Solar collectors. Does not include structural supporting members. SECTION II. FINDINGS AND DECLARATION. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista specifically and expressly finds and declares that each of the amendments noted above to the 2007 Edition of the California Building Code is necessary due to local climatic. geological and topographical conditions. SECTION m. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance will take effect and be in force thirty days after final passage. Presented by Approved as to fonn by James Sandoval Dit"ector of Planning and Building v~ ~~-::b; i-r-- Ann Moore U City Attomey Brad Remp. C.8.0 Assistant Director/Building Official {":'.l)tll:Ul1lenls :1111.1 Sc:ttil1gs\elis:"II::\Lllcal S~ttil1g:s\TL'111pnr::iry rl~~~~les\OLKF\CBC07.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 1508 OF THE CHUlA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 2007 EDITION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA DOES ORDAIN AS FOllOWS: SECTION I. That Chapter 15.08 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sections: 1508010 1508.020 1508.030 1508040 1508.041 1508045 15.08.050 1508060 1508070 1508080 1508090 1508100 Chapter 15.08 BUILDING CODE California Building Code, 200+Z Edition adopted by reference. Subsoction 104.2.1 General, amended to designate ,^,ssistant Director of Planning anEl Building os Building Official. Subsestion 105.1 Boord of .^.ppeals and ,^.d','isors is amended to conler suitability of alternate materials jurisdiction on Boord of ,^,ppeale. Subsoction 106.2 Exempted Worl~ is amended to delete exemptions lor certain types of construction Irom the r.oquiremont to obtain a building permit. Subsection 107.2 amended Permit feee. Subsection 107.3 amendod Plan Review loes. This soction 'NOS repealed by Ordinanco ~Io. 2871. Subsection 108.1.2 addod to Section 108.1 to authorizo compliance curley inspections. Subsection 709.4.1 704.11 12 amended to add an exception to the requirement for parapets. Subsection 904.2.1 903.2 12 amended to require installation of automatic fire- extinguishing system in buildings greater than certain height Section 1503 amended to provide lor more rostrictivo roof coverings. Subsection ~ 1509.5 12 added to Section +&1-t 1509 to require equipment enclosures on roofs. 15.08.010 California Building Code, 2004Z Edition adopted by reference. There is hereby adopted by reference the California Building Code, 2007 Edition, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 part 2, includinq aM Appendix.Q Chaptor d, Division 1[; and Appendix! Chapter 15; /\ppendix Chapter d1, Division II and Di'lision III of that Geflaifl document as copyrighted by the International Conference of e!uilding Officials Code Councii, and the California Building Standards Commission. Chapter 11, .^.ccessibility is 110r-oby exomptod. Said document is hereby adopted as the Building Code of the City of Chula Vista for regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, moving, demolition, conversion, occupancy, use, height, and area of all buildings and structures in the City. Providing fer the issuance of permits and collection of loos therelor and each and 011 such r-ogulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and torms of the Calilornia Building Code, 2001 Edition, anEl ,^,ppenElix Chaptor d, Division !!; ,^,ppendix (.:\[)lll.:l.\I11~l1b :lIld Sdtings\~lisac\Ll)cal Senings\Templlrury 11l6~~~es\OLKF\CBC07 S_U.doc ChJptor 15; ,^,ppondix ChJptor :l1, Div:sion II and Division III Jre homby FOforrod to, Jdoptod, Jnd mJdo J pJrt horeof JS tho~gh luIIy sot forth horoin, excepting such portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified, or amended. Municipal Code Chapter 15.06 shall serve as the administrative. orqanizational and enforcement rules and requlations for this Chapter. 15.08,020 S~bseGtien 104.2,1 General amended to designate assistant direster of tile building divisien as b~ilding ef.fisia!. Subsoction 101.2.1 of tho CJlifornicl B~ilding Codo, os it applios in tho City of Ch~1J Vista, is horoby omondod to read os follows: Subsoction 1012.1 Gonorol. Tho Bu'lding Official is horoby authorizod and dir-actod to ontorco 011 tho previsions of this codo. For such purposos the Building Official sholl hJVO tho powors of J low onforcomont offico:. Tho Building Official sholl RJVO tho ~owor to rondo: intorprotJtions of this codo and to adopt Jnd onforco rulos and rogulations supplofRontal to this codo os fRJY 130 e1oomoe nocossar! in ordor to clanfy tho application of tho provisions of this codo. S~ch intorpretations, rulos and rog~IJtions shJIl 130 in conformity with the intont one p~rposo of this codo. Tho B~ilding OlliciJI sholl 130 tho ,'Icsistant Dirostor of tho Building Division. 15,08,OJO SUGsestien 105,1 Beard ef ^I'lpeals and Aavisars amenaeato sonfer s~itabilitJ of alternate materials j~risaistion on Boara of AIl\:Jea1s. Subsoction 105.1 of the California Building Codo, os it applios in tho City of Chula VistJ, is horob,' omondod to rOJd os follows: S~bsoclion 105.1 BOJrd of ,A,ppoals Jnd ,^,dvisors. To dotormino 11'10 s~itobility of ollo:nJto matonols, mothods of construction and to provide for rOJsonablo intorpr-olation of tho pfOvisions of this codo, thoro sholl be and Is horoby oroatod J Boord of ,^,ppools anel ,^,dvisors consisling of Sovon mombors who Jro q~Jlifiod by o)(perionco one trJining to pass ~pon mallors portalning to 8~ilding constr~clion. Tho B~Ilding Official shall bo on ox officio mombor who sholl not 130 ontillod 10 voto Jnd who sholl oct os socrotar! 10 tRe BOJrd. Tho Boord of AppoJls and .^.dvisors shall 130 a~~ointod by tho Mayo: and confirmoe by Ihe Cit,' Council. Tho Boord sholl rondor JIl docisions anel findings in writing to tho B~ilding Official with 0 d~plicJte co~y to tho JppollJnt. Tho dooision of tho Boord is final. Tho BOJrd of ,'Ippools ana .^.dvisors sholl re80ffimona to 11'10 City Council s~cR now 10gislJtion doomod nocossarj to govorn construction in tho Cit)' of ChulJ Visla. 15.08,040 Exempted Werk S~l:lseGtien 106,2 is ameRaed te aelete exem\:JtieRs fer certain types af Genstr~GtieA trem tile reEjUiremeRt to ebtaiA a b~ilaing permit. Subsoction 106.2 of tRe CJlifornia Building Codo os it applios in Ch~IJ VistJ shJl1 r-aod os follows: S~bsocjion 1 Q6.2 EXEMPTED 'NORK. No PO:SOA, firm, or corporation sRolI oroct, construct, onlargo, oltor, ropair, FROVO, improvo, romoyo, convort, or domolish any 8~ilding or str~cture in tho (':\[)Ol.:UIllt:I1IS <.Jilt! Scttil1gs\eJi.:iuc\Lt1l.:uI S~ttings\Tell1por:.Jry [I~~~ sles\OLKF\CBC07 S_U.doc city of Chula Vista or sauso tho samo to be done without lirct obbning 0 soparate building pormit for oach such building or structure frDm tho Building Official except as follows: ^ ", Foncos up to wlonty FiVO inchos and froo standing masonry WJlls up to forty eight inches in height above tho Righest adjacent grado. B. Dotachod patio covors, not excoeding FNelvo loot in hoight, with a projoctod mof GrOG not to oxcood ono hundr.ed forty lour squaro loot and at least six leot lfOm any building or structure on the same property. Ono storj detocRod occessorj buildings, net oxcooding twol'lo loot in height used as tool and storago shods, ployhousos and similar usos, providod tho lioor omo doos not oxcood ono hundrod Iorty four squaro loot and oro 10CJtod so as to comply with tho pr{)visions of ChulJ Vista Municipal Codo, goction 19.58.020 c. D. Oil derricks. E. MOVJblo casos, countors, and portitionc not ovor li'lo loot, nino inchos in hoight. F. Rotaining walls which aro not ovor throo foot in Reight moasured fmm tho top of tho looting to tho top of tho WJII, unloss supporting 0 surchar.ge or impounding liammablo liquids. G. T elov/sion Jnd mdio :mtennas loss than thirty fivo Ioet in hoight. H. ,^iNnings projecting net mom than lift, four incRes and attached te, Jnd supported by, tho exterior walls of buildings ef Group R 3, Divisien 3 or U Occupancy. I. Platferms, walks and dri'lowoj'S not more than thirt, incRes above grade and not over any bJsemont or story below. I ,. Tomporarj motion picturo, tolc'lision Jnd thoJtor stogo sots and sconory. K. Pro fabricated swimming pools accessory to a Gr-oup R, Division 3 Occupancy in which the pool WJlls am entirely abovo tho adjacent grado and if tho capacity dees not mewed live thousand gJllens. L Fish ponds, reliective peols or ether decorativo ':iator contJinors with 0 wet surl'aco Jrea of one hundred square foot or lecs and a maximum de~tl1 of eighteen inches to the flood rim. M. Repairs which involvo only the replacement of component parts of existing work with similar materials lor the purpose of maintonance, and which 80 not aggregato ovor $500.00 in valuation in any twolve month poriod, and do not affect any olectrical, plumbing or mochanical installations. Repairs exempt frem pormit mquiroments sholl not include any addition, chango, or modilication in construction, exit facilitios, or permanent fixturos or equipment. gpocifically oxempted from permit requirements without limit to valuation ore: 1. Painting, ~apering, docorating and similar Yiorl~. (":',D\\ttlll1el1L:. and Settings\clis:.lI.:\Lol.:ul S~ttil1gs\Tel11rllrary [1lf)~'3tleS\OLKF\CBC07 S_U.tloc 2. InstJIIJtioR 01 ~oor sO'loring. 3. (3binot won\. 4. Ouffiido pClVing 01 R 3 Jnd U OccupJncios pJrking surbcos. (CCR Titlo 24 Dis3blod .^,ccoss Ro~uifOd.) 6. Ro rooling suildings 01 Group R 3nd U Occup3ncios 01 less thJn fi'le hURdfGd SqUJfO foot or loss thJn lifty porDont 01 roof cO'loring roplJcomont. This soction sholl Rot bo construed to mquiro sepJrote building permits for dwelling Jnd Jccessory buildings or structuros on tho SJme proporty which ore described in the suilding pormit JpplicJtion. plot plan onEl othor drJwings. Exomption from tho pormit roquifDmontc of this sodo sholl not bo deemod to gront JuthorizJtion for any worl\ to be dono in Jny mJnne: in violJtion of tho provisions ef this code or Jny other IJWS or ordinoncos 01 tho City 01 ChulJ Vista. 15.08.1)41 SllllseotiElR 107.2 amendeEl Permitfees. Subcoction 107.2 01 tho Colilo:niJ Building Codo is omendod to read JS follows: Subsection 107.2 Pormit Foos. Pormit foes sholl be os spocifiod in the Mostor Foo Schodulo of tho City of ChulJ Vista. 15.08.045 SU8sediEln 107.J amenEleEl Plan Rcvicw fees. Subsoction 107.3 01 tho Colifo:nio Building Code is omondod to food JS follo.....s: Subsoction 107.3 PIJn Roview Foos. '.^Ihon J plan or othor dotJ 3ro mquirod to bo submittod by Subsection 106.3.2. 0 plJn rC'liew foe shJII bo pJid at tho time of susmitting pbns Jnd spocificotions for reviow. Said ~bn reviow sholl be JS speciliod in tho Moster Foe Sehodulo. 15.08.050 SectiElR 107 is amendeEllly aElEliR!j sullsectiElR 107.7, Exoe!ltioRs, wai'liR!j fees for !jElVernmeRt entities, aREI SullseolieR 107.8, ReteRtiElR Elf !lIaRS, te sl1ar!je fees RElt contaiReEl iR IRe UBC. RopeJlod by Ord. 28723 1. 2002. (Ord. 2780 B 3 1. 1999). 15.08.060 SU8seotiEln 1Q8.1.2 aElEleEl to SeotiElR 108.1 tEl autl10rize cElm!llianoe survey iRs!leetiElRs. Subsection 108.1.2 is horoby oddod to Section 108.1 of the CJlifomio BuilElin~ Codo, os it Jpplies in Chub ViSt3, Jnd said subsection (h) sholl read os follows: Subsoction 108.1.2 Compliance Survey Inspoction. Upon fOcoipt 01 0 written requost fo: J compliJnce survoy !rem tho owner and pJymont of the foe speciliod in tho Mostor Feo Schedulo, tho (-'''Dl1cument:; anti Sellings\t::lisuc\LOI.:<:ll Settings\Telllporal'Y rl1er~~,tes\OLKF\CBC'07 S_U.doc Building Offici31 may inspoct 3n existing structurG to a8cort3in its compliance with the provisions of this coda ond other applicable lows ond ordinancos, 3nd roport findings in writing to the owner. 15.08.070 Subsection 709.4.1 704.11 is amended to add an exception to the requirement for parapets. Exception e Z is hereby added to Subsection 709.4.1 704.11 of the California Building Code, as it applies in Chula Vista, which EXCEPTlml e and shall read as follows: Exception e Z. Conversion of existing Group R occupancies to offices. 15.08.080 Subsection 904.2.1 903.2 ~ amended to require installation of automatic fire. extinguishing system in buildings greater than certain height. Subsection 904.2.1 903.2 of the California Building Code is hereby amended, as it applies in Chula Vista, by the addition of the following: In every building regardless of occupancy, group or type of construction, when such building is more than forty feet or four stories or more in height. 15.08.090 SeGtioR 1503 amended to provide for more restriGtive roaf Go'/erings. Soction 15Ga of tho California Building GoEle 08 it oppliod in Chula Vieta is amondod os follows: Sootion 1501 Tl=lo roof covoring on any structuro rogulatod 13y this codo Sh311 bo os spocifiod in Tablo ~Jo. 15 ,^. and os classifiod in Soction 1504. Wood shingles and wood shol(os sholl havo 0 minimum Closs "C" fire rosistivo roting. 15.08.100 Subsection ~ 1509.6 is added to Section t&14 1509 to require equipment enclosures on roofs. Subsection ~ 1509.6 is hereby added to Section -1-9++ 1509 of the California Building Code, as it applies in Chula Vista, which subsoction 1511.5 and shall read as follows: Subsection ~ 1509.6 Equipment Enclosure. Operating equipment, including piping and ducts located on the roof of a building, shall be shielded from view from public thoroughfares, and private and public parking lots. Equipment enclosures shall not be constructed so as to trap flammable or combustible vapors. Exception: Solar collectors. Does not include structural supporting members. SECTION II. FINDINGS AND DECLARATION. (, ":,!)\lClIl11l;:l1b and Settings\elisac\Local Settings\Telllpllrary 'r~e~3 ~les\OL[(F\CBC07 S_U.d\)(,; The City Council of the City of Chula Vista specifically and expressly finds and declares that each of the amendments noted above to the 2007 Edition of the California Building Code is necessary due to local climatic, geological and topographical conditions. SECTION III. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance will take effect and be in force thirty days after final passage. Presented by Approved as to form by James Sandoval Director of Planning and Building Ann Moore City Attorney Brad Remp, C.B.O Assistant Director/Building Official {':\DocLJmenb :md Settil1gs\etisa.:\Lol.:Jl Settings\Tel11l'\ln1ry rnEf=.e3~ks\OLKF\(,BC07 S_U.uoc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF 1HE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.10 OF 1HE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING 1HE CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE, 2007 EDITION The City Council of the City ofChu1a Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION I. That Chapter 15.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Chapter 15.10 REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE Sections: 15.10.010 California Referenced Standards Code, 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. 15.10.010 California Referenced Standards Code, 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. There is hereby adopted by reference the California Referenced Standards Code, know as California Code of Regulations, Title 24 part 12,2007 Edition, excluding Chapter 12-1 Administration of that document, as copyrighted by the California Building Standards Commission. Said document is hereby adopted as the Referenced Standards Code of the City of Chula Vista, excluding Chapter 12-1, for the purpose of providing minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, health, property and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, certain equipment, use and occupancy, location and maintenance of all buildings and structures within the City of Chula Vista. Municipal Code Chapter 15.06 shall serve as the administrative, organizational and enforcement rules and regulations for this Chapter. SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance will take effect and be in force thirty days after final passage. Presented by Approved as to form by James Sandoval Director of Planning and Building v~ ()h~t Ann Moore City Attorney 6-40 Ordinance No. Page 2 Brad Remp, C.B.O Assistant Director/Building Official H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\CRSC07.doc 6-41 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.10 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE, 2007 EDITION. . THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES ORDAIN AS FOllOWS: SECTION I. That Chapter 15.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read: Chapter 15.10 REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE Sections: 15.10.010 15.19.929 Califomia Referenced Standards Code 2001- 2007 Edition adopted by reference. SUBseGliaA 12.1.105.2 of SestioA 12.1.105 ameAEleEl te aesi€lAate Boam of ^ppeals anEl aEl>Jisar-s as Boam of appeals. 15.10.010 California Referenced Standards Code, 2QO.1. 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. There is hereby adopted by reference that serlain Elosumenl KAowA ami Elesi€lAateEl as the Califomia Referenced Standards Code, know as Califomia Code of Regulations, Title 24 part 12, 2001- 2007 Edition, excludina Chapter 12-1 Administration of that certain document, as copyrighted by the Califomia Building Standards Commission. Said document is hereby adopted as the Califomla Referenced Standards Code of the City of Chula Vista, CalifeFAia, excludina Chapter 12-1, for the purpose of providing minimum standards to safeguard life or limb. health, properly and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, certain eauipment. use and occupancy, location and maintenance of all buildings, structures within the City of Chula Vista tRis jufisdistion aAa seFlaiA equipmeAt spesifisally r:e€lulated her:eiA. Municipal Code Chapter 15.06 shall serve as the administrative, oraanizationai and enforcement rules and reaulatlons for this Chapter. 15.10.020 Subsestian 12.1.105.1 of Sestian 12.1.105 amended ta designate !laaFEI af ^ppeals and Ad':isars as !laaFG af Appeals. SUBseelieA 12.1.195.1 af SeslioA 12.1.195 af IRe CaiifGmia Reler:eAsea SlaAdams CeEle 1999 fQQ1 editioA, aAa Ihe lille pr.meaeAt tRer:elo, as it applies iA tRe City af CRula Visla, is ReFel3y ameAdeale Fead as lellows: Baam af I\ppeals aAEl .^,a':iser-s. Sestlon SUBsesliaA 12.1.105.1 GeAeral. 11'1 eFEier to Rear aAa ElesiEle appeals of aFEieFS, aosisieAs er deteFFAiAaliaAs made BY the BuildiAg OfIisial or fife shief r:elative Ie the applisalioA aAa iRteFf3r.elatisAs sf tRis seae, theFe is Rer:eBY eSlaBlisReEl a Baam sf .'\ppeals aAd ,'\aviser-s seAsistiAg ef seveA memBeFS '....he BFe Ejualifiea BY expeFieAse ana traiAiAg to pass UpSA matter-s peRaiAiAg Ie H:\BLD HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\FinaJ Draft\CRSC07 S_U.doc - 6-42 b~i1ai~~ ce~strYstiaR, ~se a~a asc~paRGY. Tl:1e AssistaRt Directer af the PlaRRiR~ aRa !MaiR~ Di\'isiaR aRa the Fire Mal<Jl:1al sRall be eJ( sffic'e membelt1 '.'il:1a sl:1all ~et be eRtitled Ie VBte. TRe AssistaRt Directer ef tRe PlaRRiR~ aREI 8~ilaiR~ Di'..isien sRall act as sesretarjle the 8saFEl. Tl:1e 8saFEl af I',ppeals ana ,\avisel<J sRall be appei~tea by tRe Mayer aRa cenlirmea by the City Ce~Rcil. Tl:1e 8saFEl shall reRaer all aecisieRs aRa IiRain~s iR WFjijR~ Ie tfle Assistant Dir-eGtar of !Bg PlaRRiR~ aRa 8~i1diR~ Di'/isiaR witl:1 a~plicate sapy te the appellaRt. ,\ppeals te the bsaFEl shall be pFGsossea iR ascaFElaAso witR the pFG'/isisRs cORtaiRea iR CRJpt-er 5 of tl:1is saae sr iR aSSeraJRSS ','Iitl1 s~sl:1 pFGcea~res as may be prescFibea by tl:1e CiF! /\ttoFAey of tRe City sf CR~la Vista. Tl:1e aesisieR of the BoaFEl is IiRal. The 8sar.a of ,A,ppeals ana M'/iselt1 sl:1all reGSFAFAeRa te the City Ce~Rsil s~cl:1 Re',\' le~islatieR aeemea Ressssary to ~e\'sFA censtructieR, use aRa aGS~pJRGY ef struGtures iR the City ef CI:1~la Vista. SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DATE. This erdinance will take effect and be in ferce thirty days after final passage. Presented by Approved as te ferm by James Sandeval Directer ef Planning and Building Ann Moere City Attemey Brad Remp, C.B.O Assistant Director/Building Official H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\CRSC07 S_U.doc 6-43 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 2007 EDITION The City Council of the City ofChula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION I. That Chapter 15.16 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Chapter 15.16 MECHANICAL CODE* Sections: 15.16.010 California Mechanical Code, 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. · For statutory authority for cities to adopt codes by reference, see Gov. Code S 50022.1, et seq.; for statutory adoption of building codes and other codes to apply as housing construction regulations throughout the state, see Health and Safety Code S 17922. 15.16.010 California Mechanical Code 2007 Edition adopted by reference. There is hereby adopted by reference the California Mechanical Code, 2007 Edition, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 4, and Appendix A thereof as copyrighted by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials and the California Building Standards Commission. Said document is hereby adopted as the Mechanical Code of the City ofChula Vista, providing for and regulating the complete installation and maintenance of heating, ventilation, cooling and refrigeration systems within the City. Municipal Code Chapter 15.06 shall serve as the administrative, organizational and enforcement rules and regulations for this Chapter. SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DATE. lbis ordinance will take effect and be in force thirty days after final passage. Presented by Approved as to form by James Sandoval Director of Planning and Building .~~ tt~~1r- Ann Moore City Attorney 6-44 Ordinance No. Page 2 Brad Remp, C.B.O Assistant Director/Building Official H:\Attomey\Final Resos\2007\11 13 07\CMC07.doc 6-45 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 2007 EDITION. THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES ORDAIN AS FOllOWS: SECTION I. That Chapter 15.16 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Chapter 15.16 MECHANICAL CODE" Sections: 15.16.010 Hi.1e.020 1a.1e.030 Hi.1e.040 18.1e.080 California Mechanical Code:!OO+ 2007 Edition adopted by reference. S~llseatiaR 198.1 ameREleEl ta Elesi~Rato ll~ili~in!:l sffiaial. S~llsestian 119.1 amenElea la confer s~itabilily sf altemate mateRals j~risElictian sn baarEl af apfleals. S~bsectian 1113.1 amenEleEl ta sflecif-y local fee str~clure. S~bseation 118.3, Plan re':ie'll fees, is EleleteEl. " For statutory authority for cities to adopt codes by reference, see Gov. Code 9 50022.1, et seq.; for statutory adoption of building codes and other codes to apply as housing construction regulations throughout the state, see Health and Safety Code 9 17922. 15.16.010 California Mechanical Code 20M 2007 Edition adopted by reference. There is hereby adopted by reference IRat aortain sss~ment known ana aesi~nates as the California Mechanical Code, :!OO+ 2007 Edition, known as the Califomia Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 4, and Appendix A, CRaflter 13, Part I, of :\flflensix e, ana '^'flpensix C thereof as copyrighted by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials and the California Building Standards Commission. Said document is hereby adopted as the Mechanical Code of the City of Chula Vista, providing for and regulating the complete installation and maintenance of heating, ventilation, cooling and refrigeration systems within the City. ,...aAEI flr-D'Iiain!:l Ier tRe iss~ance of permits themler, ana eacR ana all s~cR re~~lalions, provisions, flenalties, sanaitians anEl torms of tRe Califomia MeoRanioal Caae, 2901 eElitian, ana :\flpensix .^., CRapter 13, Part I, sf ^flflOnsix e ans/\ppenElix C lher€to are Rereey fofcArea to, aaofltos ana mase a part Reresf as tho~!:lh fully sot fertR Rerein, OXGefllin~ s~cR portions as are hereinaftor Elelelea, meElifioa or amenaea. Municipal Code Chapter 15.06 shall serve as the administrative, orGanizational and enforcement rules and reGulations for this Chapter. 15.16.020 Subs6stiEln 108.1 amended tEl designate building Elffisial. S~esesliaA 198.1 af tRe Calilemia MesRanisal Cose, as it applies in Ch~la Vista, sRall reas as fellav.'s: H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\CMC07 S_U.doc 6-46 a~l3sestion 1Qg.1 General. The EMa/n!j Oflisial is AeFeby aytAsrizea ana air-eslea 10 enfeme aillAe ~rev/sions of lAis oose. Fer S~SA p~~oses the EMain!j Oflisial sAail Aave tAe pawors of a la'.'l eRfereement ofliser. TAe EMsinfl OflisiJl sAail Aa':e lAe ~awer 10 Fenaer /nle~FelatieRs of tA/S sase ana to aaopt aRa enforoe FIlias aRa r-efl~lat/SRS s~~~lemeRtalla tAis oose as may l3e aeemaa nesessary iR orSer to olarify tAe applioatiaR sf the previsions of lhis soae. a~sA inle~retatisns, rules ana re!j~laliens sAail /;)e in oonfermlty wilh tAe inlent aRa p~r~ose of IAis ssae. TAe El~i1ainfJ Oflisial, herein referenoea, sAail be the .A.ssistaRt Diraotsr of the El~ilainfJ Division. 15.16.030 S~bseGtiaR 110.1 ameRaed to GaRfer switability of alternate materials j~risdiGtian an board of appeals. ayl3sestion 11Q.1 of the Californ/a Meohan/sal Caae, as It a~~lies iR Ch~la V/sla, si:1ail reaa as feilows: a~l3seotion 11Q.1 Eleara af I\ppeals ana /\avisars. Te aelermine tAe s~ila/;)iiity of altemale materials, meIRaas sf sanstrystian aRa to prev/ae fer Feasanable inle~retation af tAe previsions of li:1is soae, tAere si:1all be ana is AeFeby orcatea a Elsara of ^ppeals ana ,^,av/sars sons/slin!! of se':en moml3efS who ar-e (;!~aliflea by experieRoe ana trainin!jle pass ~pon malters peFlaininflle mesAanieal aesi!jn, sonstFllstian ana mainlananoe ana IRe p~l3lis Aealth aspesls of meshanisal syslems ana wha are nst em~layees of tAe jyrisdistion. TAe El~i1aiR!j Oflioial sAail be an ex aflisia member who si:1all nst l3e ent/lled te vele and WAO shail ast as sesFetary Ie tAe ElearEl. The Elaar.a shail be appa/nlea by ti:1e Maysr ana sonflrmoa l3y the C/ty Caynoil. The ElsarEl si:1ail Fenaer ail aesisians and flnain!js in 'l:rit/n!jle the ElYilaiRfJ Oflioial with a s~plioate oapy 10 lAe appeilaRI. Tho aeoisian of lAe BaarS is final. 15.16.040 S~bseGtian 115.1 amenEleEl ta speGify laGal fee strwlltwre. aYl3sestian 115.1 af SoolioR 115 of the California Meshan/sal Coae, as it applies iR Ci:1~la Vista, shail reaa as feilows: ~ a~bseslian 115.1 General. Fees shail be assessea in aGoor.aanoo wilA tAO Master Foe SOAes~le of IRe City sf CA~la Vista. 15.16.050 S~bseGtian 115.3, Plan re'/ia'll feas, is EleleteEl. S~135eslion 115.3 sf lAe Califemia MeoAanioal Code is aeletea. SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance will take effect and be in force thirty days after final passage. H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\FinaI Draft\CMC07 S_U.doc 6-47 Presented by James Sandoval Director of Planning and Building Brad Remp, C.B.O Assistant Director/Building Official H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Dra:ft\CMC07 S_U.doc 6-48 Approved as to form by Ann Moore City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.24 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, 2007 EDITION The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION I. That Chapter 15.24 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Chapter 15.24 ELECTRICAL CODE * Sections: 15.24.010 15.24.035 15.24.040 15.24.045 15.24.050 15.24.055 15.24.060 Califomia Electrical Code, 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. Previously used materials. Repealed. Distribution panels - Separate required when. Circuit cards to be posted when. Electric fences - Defined - Prohibited. Phase alTangement - Amended. '" For statutory provisions exempting electrical contractors from licensing under an electrical repairman's statute. see Bus. and Prof Code 0 9804. For statutory provisions authorizing cities to regulate the materials used in wiring stmctures for electricity and in piping them for water, gas or electricity, and to regulate the mffi1l1er of such piping. see Gov. Code S 38660. 15.24.010 California Electrical Code 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. There is hereby adopted by reference the Califomia Electrical Code, 2007 Edition, known as the Califomia Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 3, as copyrighted by the National Fire Protection Association and the Califomia Building Standards Commission. Said document is hereby adopted as the Electrical Code of the City of Chula Vista regulating the installation, repair, operation and maintenffi1ce of all electrical wiring and electrical apparatus of any nature whatsoever, whether inside or outside of any building within the City, excepting such portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified, or amended. Municipal Code Chapter 15.06 shall serve as the administrative, organizational and enforcement rules and regulations for this Chapter. 15.24.035 Previously used materials. Previously used materials shall not be reused in any work without approval by the Building Official. 6-49 Ordinance No. Page 2 15.24.045 Distribution panels - Separate required when. Each store in a store building, each flat in a flat building, and each building used as a dwelling shall be so wired that each store, apartment, flat or dwelling shall have separate lightlng and/or power distribution panels. Such panels shall not serve other portions of the building. Hotels, motels, hotel apartments and similar types of buildings may be wired ti'om one or more distribution panels. 15.24.050 Circuit cards to be posted when. When requested by the Building Official, a complete schedule of circuits showing the number, kind and capacity of each outlet on each circuit shall be posted on each job prior to rough inspection. 15.24.055 Electric fences - Defined - Prohibited. A. As used herein, the term electric fence includes all fences which in any way use electrical energy as an additional deterrent or have wires charged with electricity which are not covered with adequate insulation to protect persons and animals coming in contact thet'ewith. B. No electric fence may be constructed, maintained or operated within the city. 15.24.060 Phase Arrangement - Amended. Section 408.3 (E) of the Califomia Electrical Code is hereby amended to read: Phase Arrangement. The phase fJlTangement on tlu-ee-phase buses shall be A, B, C from ti"ont to back. top to bottom, or left to right, as viewed tl-om the front of the switchboard or panelboard. The C phase shall be that phase having the higher voltage ground on three- phase, tour-wire delta-colmected systems. Other busbar anangements may be permitted for additions to existing installations and shall be marked. SECTION II. FINDINGS AND DECLARATION. The City Council ofthe City ofChula Vista specifically and expressly finds and declares that each of the amendments noted above to the 2007 Edition of the California Building Code is necessary due to local climatic, geological and topographical conditions. SECTION III. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance will take effect and be in force thir1y days after final passage. Presented by Approved as to fonn by (":\[Jl1ClIll1elll::; and Sdtings\elisac\LOl.:ul Settings\Tel1lporary [r'tf~%{)les\OLKF\(,ElectC07.doc Ordinance No. Page 3 '~~(U~~ Ann Moore t City Attorney Jim Sandoval Director of PlalU1ing and Building Brad Remp, C.B.O Assistant Director/Building Official C":\[JtlClIl1ll:lllS alld Settings\elis,H:\LI1C<l] Settings'Temporary InEf:%~leS\OLKF\CElectCo7.dOC ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, 2007 EDITION, WITH AMENDMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION I. That Chapter 15.24 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sections: 15.24010 15.21015 15.21.020 1521023 15.21025 15.21030 15.21.033 15.24.035 15.24.040 15.24.045 15.24.050 15.24.055 15.24.060 Chapter 15.24 ELECTRICAL CODE MID ReGULATIONS' California Electrical Code, JGG4 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. Subsection 203.1 of the Uniform .^.dministrJti'le Code Provisiens for the ~13tionJI ElectricJI Code 3mended BOJfd of JppeJls Jnd Jd'licors. Subsection 201.1 of the Uniform Mministmti'le Code Provisions for the ~l3tionol ElectricJI Code Jmended Enforcement Juthofity Powers Jnd duties of the building olRcial. Subsection 301.2 of the Uniform .^,dministrJtive CeGe Provisiens for the ~Iotionol Electrical Code amended Exompt 'Nerk. Subsection 301.1 of the Uniform /\dministrJtive Code Pro'/isions for the ~lJtienJI Electrical Code amended te have permit foes r-cforence city's master foe schedule. Subsection 301.2 of the Uniform ,^,dministrativo Code Pre'/isions for the National Electrical Code is deleteG. Subsection 305.5 of the Uniform ,^,dministrJtivo Code Provisions for the National Electrical Code Jmended Reinspections. Previously used materials. Repealed. Distribution panels - Separate required when. Circuit cards to be posted when. Electric fences - Defined - Prohibited. Phase arrangement - Amended. For statutory provisions exempting electrical contractors from licensing under an electrical repairman's statute, see Bus. and Prof. Code I) 9804. For statutory provisions authorizing cities to regulate the materials used in wiring structures for electricity and in piping them for water, gas or electricity, and to regulate the manner of such piping, see Gov. Code I) 38660. , 15.24.010 California Electrical Code 2004 2007 Edition aREl URifarm .\ElmiRistrative CoEle pro'lisioRs for tile NatioRal Elestrisal CoEle, 1996 eElitioR, adopted by reference. (".\[l\ll:UIll.:nls unl! Settings\elisuc\Lllcal Settings\Templlrary 11l~~~~es\OLKF\CElec[C07 S_U.doc There is hereby adopted by reference that certain doc8mont known ::md designatod os the California Electrical Code, :1GG4 2007 Edition, known as the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 3, and the UnifofFR .^.dminislrativo Codo PfBvisions for tho ~btional Electrical Codo, 19913 Edition os publishod by tho IntornCltional Confemnco of Building OfficiClls as copyriqhted by the National Fire Protection Association and the California BuildinG Standards Commission. Said documents af8 ~ hereby adopted as the Electrical Code of the City of Chula Vista, California regulating the installation, repair, operation and maintenance of all electrical wiring and electrical apparatus of any nature whatsoever, whether inside or outside of any building within the City, and iss8anco of porlt1its Clnd p;oviding for tho inspoction thoreof. exceptinG such portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified, or amended. Municipal Code Chapter 15.06 shall serve as the administrative, orGanizational and enforcement rules and reculations for this Chapter. 15.24.015 S8Dseetien 203.1 af the Unifarm /\dministrative CaEle Pra'/isians far tho Natianal Eleetrieal Cade amendeEl Beard af appeals and Ad'/isars. Subsoction 203.1 of tho Uniform .^.dlt1inistrolivo Codo Provisions for tho Notional Eloctricol Codo Clmondod to dosignoto the Boore of ,^,ppoClls and ,^,dvisors os tho BOClrd of ,^,ppools: In ordo; to hOClr Clnd docieo appools of ardors, eocisions er detorlt1inCltions modo by tl10 Building OfficiClI relotivo to tho application and inlorpfGtCltions of this codo, tl10m sl10ll bo Clnd is 110reby crootod CI Boord of ,^,ppools OAe /\dvisofS consisting of sovon mombors who oro qualified by oxporionco and training to pass upon mClUofS portClining to oloctricol aspects of construction. The B8ilding ()lIiciol sholl bo CIA ox officio mombor who shClII not bo entillod to voto and who shClII oct os socmtClry to tho BOCl;d. Tho Board of ,^,ppools and ,^,dvisors shClII be oppointod by lho Citi' Council from tho qUCllilioe oloctors of tho City in occordClnco with lho pr-ovisions of Soction 600 ot soq. of tho Chortor. Tho Boord sholl rendor 011 docisions and lindings in writing to tho Building Official wilh a duplicolo copy to tho Clppollont. Tho docision of tho Boord is final. Tho Boord of ,^,ppools aAd ,^,evisorG sholl rocommond to tho City Council such now logislotion doomod necossary to govorn oloctricol aspocts of construction in tho City of Chulo Vista. 15.24.020 Subseclian 2Q1.1 af tRe Unifarm Administrative CaEle Pravisians for the National EleGtriGal CaEle amemleEl EnfarGement autRarity Pawers and E1uties af the Buildinlil OffiGial. Subsoction 201.1 ef tho Uniform Mministrotivo Code Provisions for tho ~Jotionol Eloctricol Codo omondod os it opplios in Chulo Vista sholl rood os follows: Subsoction 201.1 Ceneral. It sl1311 be tho duty of tl10 Building Official to enforco tho p;o'licions of this codo. Tho Building ()fficiol sh311 bo tho ,^,ssistont Dimctor of lho 8uildiA~ Division. ::or such purposos, tho Building Official sholl hovo tho powors of 0 low onforcoment alii cor. Tho Buileing Official sl1ol1 havo tho powor to fOAdor intorprotCltions of this codo and to oeopt and onforco rulos oAd r-cgulotions supplomentol to this cedo os may bo doomod AOcossory in ordor to clarify tho application of tl10 provisions of this coda. Such intorprotations. AUlos Clnd ro~ulotions sholl bo in conformity with tho intoAt oREI pUf!3oso of tl1is codo. (":\DIll.'llmenl:; and Setting::;\t:lisul.:\Locul Setting.':i\Telllpl.lral'Y 11'~~t5~IeS\OLKF\CElectC07 S_U.doc 15.21.Q2~ 5~l:lsection ~g1,2 of the Uniform I\dministrati'le Code Provisions for the National Electrical Code amended Exempt Work. Subsoction 301.2 of tho UnifDrm /\dministrative Code Pro'iisions for the Nationol Electrical Codo amendod os it applios in Chula Vista, to maG os follows: Subsoction 301.2 Exompt Work. ,^,n oloctrical parmit shall not bo required for tho following: 1. Portablo motors or othor portablo appliances onor.gizod by moans of a cord or coble hoving an attachmont plug ond to be connectod to on approvod recoptaclo whon that cord or cablo is pormitted by this codo. 2. Ropoir or replacomont of fixod motors, transforl11orG or fixod approved appliancos of the sarno typo and rating in tho saRiO location. 3. Tomporory docorativo lighting. 4. Ropair or roplacemont of current carrying p3Fts of any switch, contactor or control device. 5. Roinstallation of attochmont plug focoptaclos, but not tho outlots thoroforo. 6. Ropair or roplaceRiont of any ovorcurront dC'iice of tho requirod capacity in tho como location. 7. Ropair or roplacol11ont of oloctrodos or transformors of tho sarno sizo and capacity for signs or ~as tube systORis. 8. Taping joints. 9. Romoval ef oloctrical wiring. 10. Temporarj '.\'iriR~ for oxporiment:!1 pHrpOSOS in s~itablo oxporimontallaboratorios. 11. Tho wiring for tomporary theator, motion picturo or tolevision stage sots. 12. Eloctrical wiring, dovicos, appliancos, apparatus or oquipmont oporating less tRan 25 'IOItS and not capablo of supplying Rioro than 50 watts of onorgy. 13. Low enorgy powor, control and signal circuits of Class II and Closs III os dofinod in this GOOe, 14. ,^, pormit sRall not 130 roquired for tho installation, altoratioA or ropair of eloctrical wiring, apparatus or oquipment or tRO oquipmont or the gonoration, traAsmission, distribution or ff1otorin~ of electrical onorgy ar in the operation ef signals or tho transmission of intolligonce l3y 0 public or privato utility in tho oxorciso of its function as a Gerling utility. ("\[)\1CUI11~nts and Settings\elisac\Lllt:a\ Settings\Telllponlry ln6~es~eS\OLKF\CElel;tC07 S_U.doc 15. Comm~nications Circ~its sove:od by ,^Jticle gOO of the EloctriCJI Code. Exemptien froFA the perFAit req~ireFAents ef this codo shall Rot be doemod te g:aRt a~thorization lor any work to be dono in violatien of the provisions of this sode or any etho: lows er ordinoncos of this j~risdiction. 15.24,025 Subsealien 301.1 of IRe Uniferm .^,dministrative Cede Provisiens fer the National EleGtrical Code amended to Rave permit fees reference City's Mastor Fee SGRedule, S~bsoction 301.1 of Section 301, Foos, of the Unilorm ,^,Elministrativo Code Pr-ovisions lor tho ~btienal Electrical Codo, as it applios in Chula Vista, shall fOad os Iollows: Subsoction ;101.1 Pormit Fees. Tho foo lor ooch pormit sholl bo sot f{)rth in tho Mastor Fee Schodulo of tho City of Chula Vista. 15.2U30 Subsection 301.2 of IRe Uniform Administrati'le Code Provisiens for IRe National Electrical Code is deleted, S~bsoction 301.2, Foes, of the Unilorffl Mministrativo Codo Pr-ovisions lor tAe National Electrical Codo is deloted. 15.24.033 SubseGtion 30!i.5 of tRc Uniform .'\dministralive Code Pro'..isions for the National electrical Code afflended ReinspeGtions. Subsection 305.5 of tho Uniform ,^,E!ministrali'lo Codo Provisions lor lho ~btional Eloctrical Code, cs it applios in Chula Vista, shall read as Iollowe: Subsection 305.5 Reinspoctions. ,A, roinspoction 100 may bo assossed lor oaeA 'nspection or roinspoctien whon such portion of work lor which inspectieR is callod is not cOFAplete or whon cerrections callod lor aro not mode. This section is not to be intorproteE! os requiring reinspostion loos the lirst time 0 job is rejeetod lor IJilure to comply with tho roquiromonts of this code, but as eontrolling tho practico of calling for inspections belore the job is ready lor such inspectien or reinspectien. Reinspection fees may be assessoE! when the approvod plans ore not roadily availablo to the inspoctor, for failuro to provido accoss on the dato fer which inspoction is roquesteE!, er lor deviating froFA plans roq~iring tho approval of tho building official. Roinspoetion feos shall be as set lorth in tho Mastor Foe ScheE!~lo of the City of Chula Vieta. !n instancos where ro'nepectien feos havo been assossod, addi/ionol inspoction of the work will not bo porformed until the req~ir{)E! foos havo been paid. 15.24.035 Previously used male rials. (':\[)Ul:lIll1l'Ill.~ and S~llings\elisuc\Loc<.J1 Settings\Tt:I11)1llrury hYf~% gleS\OLKF\CElectC07 S_U.doc Previously used materials shall not be reused in any work without approval by the Building Official or on 3HthoRzod dopHFf. 15.24.045 Distribution panels. Separate required when. Each store in a store building, each fiat in a fiat building, and each building used as a dwelling shall be so wired that each store, apartment, fiat or dwelling shall have separate lighting and/or power distribution panels. Such panels shall not serve other portions of the building. Hotels, motels, hotel apartments and similar types of buildings may be wired from one or more distribution panels. 15.24.050 Circuit cards to be posted when. When requested by the Building Official, a complete schedule of circuits showing the number, kind and capacity of each outlet on each circuit shall be posted on each job prior to rough inspection. 15.24.055 Electric fences. Defined. Prohibited. A. As used herein, the term electric fence includes all fences which in any way use electrical energy as an additional deterrent or have wires charged with electricity which are not covered with adequate insulation to protect persons and animals coming in contact therewith. B. No electric fence may be constructed, maintained or operated within the city. 15.24.060 Phase Arrangement. Amended. Section 408.3 (E) of the California Electrical Code is hereby amended to read: Phase Arrangement. The phase arrangement on three-phase buses shall be A, B, C from front to back, top to bottom, or left to right, as viewed from the front of the switchboard or panel board . The C phase shall be that phase having the higher voltage ground on three-phase, four-wire delta- connected systems. Other busbar arrangements may be permitted for additions to existing installations and shall be marked. SECTION II. FINDINGS AND DECLARATION. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista specifically and expressly finds and declares that each of the amendments noted above to the 2007 Edition of the Califomia Building Code is necessary due to local climatic, geological and topographical conditions. SECTION III. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance will take effect and be in force thirty days after final passage. Presented by Approved as to form by (":'DOl'UI11t::nls <Inti S~ltings\eli~ac\Locat Settings\Tel11!wrary 11~~%SleS\OLKF\(,ElectC07 S_U.doc Jim Sandoval Director of Planning and Building Ann Moore City Attorney Brad Remp, C.B.O Assistant Director/Building Official ( ,'[)Ul.:lIlll\;'lllS and S~ltillg::;\eJi::;ac\Local Scttings'TO:l1lporury 1t1;~%~Ies\OLKF\CElectC07 S_U.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.28 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING tHE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2007 EDITION The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION I. That Chapter 15.28 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Chapter 15.28 PLUMBING CODE * Sections: 15.28.0 I 0 California Plumbing Code, 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. Prior legislation: Prior code SS 23.3 and 23.9; Ords. 779, 1332,1748, 1917, 2156,2343,2506,2508,2639 and 2646. 15.28.010 California Plumbing Code, 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. There is hereby adopted by reference the California Plumbing Code, 2007 Edition, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 5, and Appendices A, B, D and I of that document as copyrighted by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials and the California Building Standards Commission. Said document is hereby adopted as the plumbing code of the city of Chula Vista for regulating the complete installation, maintenance and repair of plumbing, drainage systems, water systems, gas systems, and private sewage disposal systems on all properties and within all buildings and structures in the city. Municipal Code Chapter 15.06 shall serve as the administrative, organizational and enforcement rules and regulations for this Chapter. SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DA IE. Ibis ordinance will take effect and be in force thirty days after final passage. Presented by Approved as to form by James Sandoval Director of Planning and Building ~J~tLL~~ Ann Moore 11 City Attorney 6-58 Ordinance No. Page 2 Brad Remp, C.B.O Assistant Director/Building Official H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\CPC07.doc 6-59 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.28 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2007 EDITION. THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES ORDAIN AS FOllOWS: SECTION I. That Chapter 15.28 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sections: 15.28.010 15.28.020 15.28.0JO 15.28.0J5 15.28.040 Chapter 15.28 PLUMBING CODE ANg REGULATIONS. California Plumbing Code, ~ 2007 Edition, known as IRe California CoEle of Re~lllatians, Title 24, Part 5, adopted by reference. . alllJseetian 102.1 amenEloEl ta Elesi~nate lJllilEling official. alllJseetion 1 OJ.4 .1 amemleEl ta Ra,..e fees riiferenee eily's master fee sCRoElllle. alllJseetian 1 Od. 4.2, Plan review fees, is E1eleteEl. alllJsestian 1 OJ. H amenseEl Ie exemflt imposilien af in,..esti~31ion fees far emer1jeney werl<. alllJseetian 10J.5.€i amemleElla refemnse IRe cily's master fee scheElllle. alllJseclion 41 J.01 aaEleEl Ie sflesify types af fasilities FRanElateEllJy slate la..... 10 eaRlflly wilh tRe FElEjlliremenls af aeetion 41 J. . For statutory authority for cities to adopt codes by reference, see Gov. Code S 50022.1, €It seq.; for statutory adoption of building codes and other codes to apply as housing construction regulations throughout the state, see Health and Safety Code S 79m 17922. 15.28.050 15.28,OeO Prior legislation: Prior code SS 23.3 and 23.9; Ords. 779, 1332, 1748, 1917, 2156, 2343, 2506, 2508, 2639 and 2646. 15.28.010 California Plumbing Code, 20M 2007 Edition, kRawR as tRe CaliferRia CaEle af RegYlatiaRs, Title 24, Part 5, adopted by reference. There is hereby adopted by reference the California Plumbing Code, ~ 2007 Edition, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 5, and Appendices A, B, G, o and FI ! of that document as copyrighted by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials and the California Building Standards Commission. Said document is hereby adopted as the plumbing code of the city of Chula Vista for regulating the complete installation, maintenance and repair of plumbing, drainage systems, water systems, gas systems, and private sewage disposal systems on all properties and within all buildings and structures in the city., flFElviElin~ for IRe issyanse af fl8FRlils aREI eallestiaR of fees theriifor, anEl eaeR ana all SlieR re!llllaliclRs, pre',isians, penalties, sonEliliaRs aREI terms af the Califemia PlllmlJin!l CaEle, 2001 ~Elltion, anEl .'IpponEliees ft., e, C, D anEl H are RomlJy referreEl Ie, H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft:\CPC07 S_U.doc 6-60 adsl3tes, and made a l3art heresf as lhe~!3h f11l1y set feFti:l i:lerein, ellsel31in!3 s~si:ll3eFliens as are i:lereinafler seleled, meaifles er amenaes. Municipal Code Chapter 15.06 shall serve as the administrative. orGanizational and enforcement rules and reGulations for this Chapter. 15.28.020 S~bsection Hl:l.1 amended to designate building omcial. S~bsestion 1 Q2.1 sflRe California PI~mbin!3 CoEle, as it aflfllies in Ch~la Visla, shall read as foIIews: Administralive A~lheFit'l. S~bsectien 1 Q2.1 Ti:le Administralive AutheFity sRall be the :\ssislant Oirecler ef tho B~i1din!3 Ol'.'isien, tl:1e ,.,~tl:1sFity d~I'I al3flointed Ie enferse tl:1is cedo. 15.28.030 Subsection 103.1.1 amended to i:lw.'e fees refer-ence cit}.,s master fee sci:ledule. S~bsectien 1QJ.1.1 of Section 1QJ.1, Fees, of tRe California Plumbin!3 Csdo, as it al3fllies in CI:1~la Vista, shall reas as felle'ss: 1 QJ.1.1 Per-mit Fees. TRe fee for eaeRl3ermit sl:1all be set forth in the Master Fee Scl:1esule ef tl:1e City ef CI:1~la Vista. 15.28.035 Subsection 103.1.2, Plan r-elJiewfees, is deleted. S~bseclisn 1 QJ. 4.2, Plan r{lvie..... fees, of IRe California PI~mbin!3 Cese is delelea. 15.28.010 S~bsection 103.1.4 amended to Elumpt impssition of in'.'estigatien fees fsr emergency 'N9Fk. S~bseetisn 1QJ.4.4 of Seelion 1QJ.1, Fees, of tl:1e Califmnia PI~mbin!3 Cese, as it aflfllios in CI:1ula Vista, sRall r{laa as follo'lls: Subseetien 1QJ,1.4 In'Josti!3atien Fees. S~bseeijsn 1 Q3.1.1.1 \^!Rene'.'er aAY work for 'NI:1jeR a flermit is Fe~~ir{la by lhis eese Ras beeA eommeAcoa witi:leut flr:st sblaiAiA!3 saia fler-mit, a sflecial investi!3atieA sl:1all be maae befoFe a l3ermit may be issuoa fer s~ei:l '.'Ierk. S~bsection 1QJ.1.1.2 An in'.'esti!3atisA fee, iA asditien Ie tl:1e l3ermit fee, sRall be collectes VlI:1elRer sr Aet a l3er-mit is tl:1en or s~bse~ueAlly iss~ss. The in'lesligalion foe sl:1all be e~~alto tl:1e ameunt of tRe fler-mit fee that 'Neuls bo reEl~ires b'ltl:1is esse if a l3ermit were Ie bs issuea. TI:1e l3ayment of suei:l iAvestigatien fee sl:1all net exemflt any l3erson frem seml3lianee with all etRer flF<lvisisAS ef ll:1is esse, nor frem any flenalty flreseribed by law. H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\CPC07 S_U.doc 6-61 S~bseGtiaR 103.4.U This 1lFEl':isiaR sRall nat a1l~ly to eme~eRsy ':J9f\( 'NReR it sRall !;Je ~FEl'leR te tho salisfaatiaR af tRe admiRislrati'le a~lhsFiI)' tRat S~SR '.'Iaf\( 'Nas ~r~eR~Y Resessary anEllhat it '::as Rot ~F3etisal te ablaiR a 1leFR'lit !;Jafore oommeRoemeRt of tRe '.'Ierk. IR all S~SR sases, a ~eFR'lit FR~st se a!;JtaiRed as saaR as it is ~raotioal te Ele se, aREl if there se aR ~RreassRal3le Elelay iR oblaiRiFl~ S~OR l'leFiRil, tRe investi~atioR fee as herelR 1lraviEleEl fer sRallse oha~es. 15.28.050 SllbseGtleR 103.5.& amenEleEl te referenGe tRe Gil}"s master fee SGReElllle. S~bseetioR 1 Q15.8 of the Califemia PI~FRbiFl~ Cade, as it a~~lies iR CR~la Vista, shall reaEl as folls'::s: S~bseGtiaFl 103.5.8 ReiRs1leGtieRs. A reiRs1laetioR fee may !;Je assesseEl fer eash iRS1leGtloR er reiRS1lestioR \\'ReR S~SR 1lertioR af 'o'o'er-l< fGr \'thisR iFls1lealioR is salleEl is Rat oam1llales ar 'sRaR re~~ireEl sarrestiaRs lia'la RSt Ilaen mase. Tliis ~rovislaR Is Ret ta se inler~releEl as re~~irin~ r-eins1lestiaR fees tlie IiFSt time a jail is rejesleEl fer fail~re te sam~ly willi llie re~~iremeRts af this oaEle, Il~t as oaFltrellin~ tlie I'lFaotioe af 6a1liR~ fGr ins1lesliaRs befere the joll is ready fer iRS1leolion er reiRS1leolian. ReiRS1lestian fees may Ile assesseEl when tRa a~~r-o'led 1llaRS are nat reasily available ts IRe ins~esler, fer fail~re to ~FEl'liEla aooess aR the sata fer '::liioli the iRSl'leetisR is re~~ireEl, or fer Eleviating frGm 1llaRS re~~iriR~ tlie a~~F8~'al ef the asmiRistrati'te a~lhaFity. Ta elltaiR a re ins1leetieR, tRe a1l1llioaRt sRalllile aR a~~lioaliaFl iR '.vrilin~ lJ~an lhe form ItiFRiSRed far tRat 1llJl'pase and ~ay tRe re iRs1laetian fee iR aoear.aaRse witR tRe Master Fee SSRed~le af tlie City af CIi~la Vista. In iRstaFlaes wRare FEliRs~eelioR fees Rave !;Jeen assesses, FIe adsilianal iFls1lestian of IRe waf\( 'I:msa 1lerfarmes ~Fllil the re~~ires fees Rave beeR 1laiEl. 15.28.0&0 Sllbsestien 413.01 aElEleEl te speGify types ef faGilities manElateEl!;Jy state law te Gemply .....It'" t"'e reqlllrements ef SeGtlen 413. S~sseeliaR 41 3.Q1 of the CaliferFlia PI~msing Ceda, as it a1l1llies in CIi~la Vista, sliall i=ead as felle'.'ls: S~sseeliaR 41J.01 Tlie re~~iFElmeRts af Seslien 413 sRall a1l1lly ta the fellewiRg ty1las af faoililies as IisleElselow: a. Faeilities wliare the ~~slie saRgFElgates S~SR as slaEli~ms, oameFltieR oenters, Gomm~nity aREl oammersial Iialls, sl'larts aREl enteFlainmeFlt araRas, s~eoiall'i event seRters, am~semeRt faoilities aREl elher similar faoilities sliall seml'lly enly \VitR tlie Fe€llliFElmeRIs af Ta!;Jle 4 1. H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\CPC07 S_U.doc 6-62 b. Faeililies !;naer tf:1e a!;IReFily sf IRe omee of Slale'l:iae Heallf:1 Plannin~ ana Develsj3Fllent (OSHPDJ), LiGensea Clinies, tf:1at aFe Fe~!;lalea by tf:1e Iseal a!;tRsFily sRall SSFllj3IY'llitR a!;bsestions aasj3tea by OSHPDJ. G. Fer all otf:1er lyj3es of faGililies, IRe req!;iFemenls sf aestisn 11 J as nst aj3j3ly. a!;sf:1 faeililies Fll!;St GOFllj3ly ',\'ilf:1lf:1e FeI1~iFI3Fllsnls of CRaj3lsr 29 of If:1e California ~Main~ Csae ana Issal healtR ssaes. SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance will take effect and be in force thirty days after final passage. Presented by Approved as to form by James Sandoval Director of Planning and Building Ann Moore City Attorney Brad Remp, C.B.O Assistant Director/Building Official H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\CPC07 S_U.doc 6-63 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHOLA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.36 OF THECHOLA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, 2007 EDITION The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION I. That Chapter 15.36 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sections: 15.36.010 15.36.025 15.36.030 15.36.035 15.36.040 15.36.045 15.36.050 15.36.055 Chapter 15.36 TIRE CODE California Fire Code, 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. Operational permit for Christmas tree lots. Operational permit for waste handling. Violation penalties. Failure to comply provisions. Definitions for Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention, Fire Department, Fire Authority Having Jurisdiction, Fire Hazard and Fire Service Features. Fire service features -- Where required. Fire hydrant spacing. 15.36.010 California Fire Code, 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. There is hereby adopted by reference the California Fire Code, 2007 Edition, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 part 9, including Appendix Chapter 1, and Appendix B through H is as copyrighted by the International Code Council, and the California Building Standards Commission. Said document is hereby adopted as the Fire Code of the City of Chula Vista, prescribing the regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire or explosion, and each and all such regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of said California Fire Code are hereby referred to, adopted and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein, excepting such portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified or amended as set forth in this chapter. 15.36.025 Operational permit for Christmas tree lots. Appendix Chapter 1 - Subsection 105.6.5.! Christmas tree lots is hereby added to the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code to read as follows: Subsection 105.6.5.1 Christmas tree lots. To operate a Christmas tree lot with or without flame proofing services. 15.36.030 Operational permit for waste handling. Appendix Chapter 1 - Subsection 105.6.45 Waste handling of the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code is hereby revised to read as follows: H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\Chapter 15_36 CFC07 - fmal.doc 6-64 Subsection 105.6.45 Waste handling. An operational permit is required for the operation of wrecking yards, junk yards and waste material-handling facilities (green waste recycling, mulching, composting operations and storage). 15.36.035 Violation penalties. Appendix Chapter I - Subsection 109.3 Violation penalties of the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code is hereby revised to read as follows: Subsection 109.3 Violation penalties. Persons who shall violate a provision of this code or shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter, repair or do work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the fire code official, or of a permit or certificate used under provisions of this code, shall be guilty ofa misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than the greater of$I,OOO dollars or as established by the City of Chula Vista Policy and Procedures Manual for Civil Penalties or by imprisonment not exceeding six (6) months, or both such fine and imprisonment Each day that a violation continues after due notice has been served shall be deemed a separate offense. 15.36.040 Failure to comply provisions. Appendix Chapter 1 - Subsection 111.4 Failure to comply of the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code is hereby revised to read as follows: 111.4 Failure to comply. Any person who shall continue any work after having been served with a stop work order, except such work as that person is directed to perform to remove a violation or unsafe condition, shall be subject to a fine of not less than $250.00 dollars or more than $1,000 dollars. 15.36.045 De[mitions for Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention, Fire Department, Fire Authority Having Jurisdiction, Fire Hazard and Fire Service Features. Chapter 2 Definitions - Section 202 is hereby added to the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code to read as follows: "Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention" means Fire Marshal. "Fire Department" means any regularly organized fire department, frre protection district, a legally formed volunteer frre department recorded with the County of San Diego, or Fire Company regularly charged with the responsibility of providing fire protection to the jurisdiction. "Fire Authority Having Jurisdiction (F AHJ)" means the designated entity providing enforcement of fire regulations as they relate to planning, construction and development. This entity may also provide frre suppression and other emergency services. "Fire Hazard" means anything that increases or could cause an increase of the hazard or menace of fire to a greater degree than customarily recognized as normal by persons in the public service regularly engaged in preventing, suppressing or extinguishing fire or any thing or act which could obstruct, delay, hinder or interfere with the operations of the fire department or egress of occupants in the event of frre. H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\FinaJ Draft\Chapter 15_36 CFC07 - final.doc 6-65 "Fire Service Features" is a general term inclusive of all other terms such as driveway, fire lane, public street, private street, parking lot, lane and access roadway. 15.36.050 Fire service features -- Where required. . Chapter 5 Fire Service Features - Subsection 508.5.1 of the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code is hereby revised to read as follows: Subsection 508.5.1 Where required. Where a portion of a facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than ISO feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. Exceptions: 1. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 250 feet. 15.36.055 Fire hydrant spacing. Chapter 5 Fire Service Features - Subsection 508.5.1.1 is hereby added to the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code to read as follows: Subsection 508.5.1.1 Water supplies and fITe hydrants. In multi-family zones and in commercial and industrial zones, fire hydrants shall be installed at intersections, at the beginning radius of cul-de-sacs, and every 300 feet (on-center) of fire access roadways, regardless of parcel size. In single-family zones, fire hydrants shall be installed every 500 feet (on-center). SECTION II. FINDINGS AND DECLARATION The City Council of the City of Chula Vista specifically and expressly finds and declares that each of the additions and amendments noted above to the 2007 Edition of the California Fire Code is necessary due to local climatic, geological and topographical conditions. SECTION III. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance will take effect and be in force thirty days after final passage. Submitted by: Approved as to form by: '''-cL-IL. ,f1~h f--- Ann Moore City Attorney Douglas A. Perry Fire Chief H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\Chapter 15_36 CFC07 - final.doc 6-66 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.36 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, 2007 EDITION The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That Chapter 15.36 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sections : 15.36.010 15.36.025 15.36.030 15.36.035 15.36.040 15.36.045 15.36.050 15.36.055 Chapter 15.36 FIRE CODE California Fire Code, ~ 2007 Edition. adopted by reference. Operational permit for Christmas tree lots. Operational permit for waste handling. Violation penalties. Failure to comply provisions. Definitions for Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention. Fire Department. Fire Authority Having Jurisdiction. Fire Hazard and Fire Service Features. Fire service features -- Where required. Fire hvdrant spacing. 15.36.010 California Fire Code, 2007 Edition, adopted by reference. There is hereby adopted by reference that certain ao cllHleHt iffiOVffl llR<i desigaatea as-the California Fire Code, ~ 2007 Edition llR<i all f.ppenaices, as compi1ea aIla plllllishea BY the Intemational FiFe Coae Institute in cooperation 'lAth the lntematienal Conference of Bllilaing Officials ana the Westorn Fife Chiefs .'\,sseciation, three cepies of 'llrn.ch are en file in the effice sf the eity clerk.. known as the California Code of Regulations. Title 24 part 9. including Appendix Chapter L and Appendix B through H is as copYrighted by the International Code Council. and the California Building Standards Commission. SllBj eet ts Slieh BHI6ndments as are herein esHtainea, s,S.aid document is hereby adopted; as the Fire Code of the City of Chura Vista. prescribing the regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire or explosion, and each and all such regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of said California Fire Code are hereby referred to, adopted and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein, excepting such portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified or amended as set forth in this chapter. 15,36.025 Operational permit for Christmas tree lots. Appendix Chapter I - Subsection 105.6.5.1 Christmas tree lots is hereby added to the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code to read as follows: H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\Chapter 15_36 CFC07 S_U.doc 6-67 Subsection 105.6.5.1 Christmas tree lots. To ooerate a Christmas tree lot with or without flame croatine: services. 15.36.030 Operational permit for waste handline. Appendix Chapter 1 - Subsection 105.6.45 Waste handliog of the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code is hereby reyised to read as follows: Subsection 105.6A5 Waste handline. An ooerational oenmt is reauired for the ooeration of wreckine yards. iunk yards and waste material-handline facilities (ereen waste recveline. mulchine. comoastine oooratians and staraee), 15.36.035 Violation penalties. Appendix Chapter 1 - Subsection 109.3 Violation penalties of the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code is hereby revised to read as follows: Subsection 109.3 Violation oenalties. Persons who shall violate a orovision of this code or shall fail to comolv with any of the reauirements thereof or who shall erect. install. alter. reoaif or do work in violation of the aooroved construction documents or directive of the fire code official. or of a oermit or certificate used under orovisions of this code. shall be euilty ofa misdemeanor. ounishable bv a fine of not more than the ereater of$1.000 dollars or as established bv the City of Chula Vista Policy and Procedures Manual for Civil Penalties or bv iroerisooment not exceedine six (6) months. or both such fme and imorisooment. Each day that a violation continues after due notice has been served shall be deemed a seoarate offense. 15.36.040 Failure to comply provisions. Appendix Chapter I - Subsection 111.4 Failure to comply of the Fire Code portion of the California Bui1diog Standards Code is hereby revised to read as follows: IliA Failure to como Iv. Anv oerson who shall continue any work after havine been served with a stOD work order. excent such work as that verSOD is directed to oerfonn to remove a violation or unsafe condition. shall be subiect to a fine of not less than $250.00 dollars or more than $1.000 dollars. 15.36.045 Definitions for Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention. Fire Department. Fire Authority Havine Jurisdiction. Fire Hazard and Fire Service Features. Chapter 2 Definitions - Section 202 is hereby added to the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code to read as follows: "Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention" means Fire Marshal. "Fire Deoartment".means any rellUlarlv ore:anized fire deoartment. fire oTotection district. a leeallv formed volunteer fire deoartment recorded with the County of San Dieeo. or Fire Comoanv reeularlv chareed with the resoonsibility of orovidine fire orotection to the iurisdiction. "Fire Authority Havine Jurisdiction WAHl)" means the desienated entity orovidine enforcement of fIre reeulations as they relate to olannine. construction and develooment. This entity may also oravicle fire sUDoression and other emere:ency services. H:\BLD_HSG\2007 Codes Adoption\Final Draft\Chapter 15_36 CFC07 S_U.doc 6-68 "Fire Hazard" means anvthin2 that increases or could cause an increase of the hazard or menace of fire to a 2feater de2fee than customarily recomized as normal by oersons in the DubHe service relIularlv ene:al!ed in oreventine:. suooressim! or extinlruishinl! fire or any thin2 or act which could obstruct. delay. hinder or interfere with the ooerations of the fire deoartment or e2fess of occuoants in the eyent of fire. "Fire Service Features" is a e:eneral term inclusive of all other terms such as driveway. fife lane. DubHc street. oriyate street. oarkin2 lot. lane and access roadway. 15.36.050 Fire service features -- Where reauired. Chapter 5 Fire Service Features - Subsection 508.5.1 of the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code is herebv revised to read as follows: Subsection 508.5.1 Where recuired. Where a oortion of a facility or buildin2 hereafter constructed or moyed into or within the iurisdiction is more than ISO feet from a hydrant on a fire aooaratus access road. as measured bv an aooroved route around the exterior of the facility or buildin2. on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be oroyided where recuired by the fire code official. ExceDtions: 1. For Grouo R-3 and Grouo U occuoancies. the distance recuirement shall be 250 feet. 15.36.055 Fire hydrant spacinl!. Chapter 5 Fire Service Features - Subsection 508.5.1.1 is herebv added to the Fire Code portion of the California Building Standards Code to read as follows: Subsection 508.5.1.1 Water suoolies and fife hydrants. In multi-family zones and in commercial and industrial zones. fife hydrants shall be installed at intersections. at the be2innin2 radius of cul-de-sacs. and eyery 300 feet (on-center) of fife access roadways. re2ardless of Darcel size. In sin2le-farnily zones. fife hydrants shall be installed eyery 500 feet (on-center). SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance will take effect and be in force thirty days after final passage. Submitted by: Approved as to form by: Douglas A. Perry Fire Chief Ann Moore City Attorney H:\BLD HSG\2007 Codes AdoptionlFinal DraftlChapter 15_36 CFC07 S_U.doc - 6-69 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT NOVEMBER 13, 2007, ItemL ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF BAYVISTA WALK MIXED-USE (COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL) PROJECT RESOLUTION ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS-05-0I2); APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (SUPS-07-01); APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT (DRC-05-39); AND APPROVING TENTATIVE MAP (PCS-07-01) TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 154 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS AND 5,000 TO 10,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE ON THE SITE AT 765-795 PALOMAR STREET SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAPS ESTABLISHED BY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.18.010 BY REZONING FOUR PARCELS CONSISTING OF THE 4.89-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 765-796 PALOMAR STREET FROM COMMERCIAL THOROUGHFARE WITH PRECISE PLAN (CT-P) TO CENTRAL COMMERCIAL WITH PRECISE PLAN (CC-P) AND APPROVING PRECISE LAN MODIFYING STANDARDS FOR OPEN SPACE AND FRONTIEXTERIOR SIDE BUILDING SETBACKS TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED BAYVISTA WALK MIXED-USE PROJECT (FIRST READING~) PLANNING AND B~IL ~G }'>IRECTOR CITY MANAGER ~.L--' ASSISTANT CITY NAGER"ST 4/5THS VOTE: YES 0 NO 0 It is recommended the public hearing be cancelled. Prepared by: Stacey Kurz, Senior Community Development Specialist -7- CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT NOVEMBER 13, 2007, Item~ ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA (a) ACCEPTING THE DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY; (b) APPROVING THE DOWNTOWN PARKING DISTRICT INTERIM ACTION PLAN; AND (c) DIRECTING STAFF TO PREPARE A DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTERS 10.56 MODFYING PARKING METER RATES AND 10.62 MODIFYING THE OVERTIME PARKING FINE RATE REDEVELOPMENjJeMA l~~~ CITY MANAGER ASSISTANT CITY NAGER ~r 4/5THS VOTE: YES ~ NO D BACKGROUND Chula Vista's only parking district was established in 1963 and now provides more than 1,700 public parking spaces through surface parking lots, on street metered spaces, and one parking structure. Revenue and staffing for the District have fluctuated over the years and the District's assets are in decline. Parking lots are in need of repairs, meters are outdated, many are inoperative, and there is inadequate revenue to pay for these capital improvements due to extremely low meter and parking fine rates. Although the District has been in place nearly 45 years, the City has never raised meter rates, which are some of the lowest in San Diego County. To examine and assess the level and impact of these deficiencies, the City conducted a comprehensive study of the downtown parking management and operations over the past nine months. The study provides a foundation for the development of a Downtown Parking Management Plan. The creation of a long-term Parking Management Plan will better assist staff and the public in understanding the dynamics of parking as part of a larger multi-modal transportation system and to address common parking misperceptions, 8-1 NOVEMBER 13,2007, ItemL Page 2 of 11 including parking demands and the potential development of certain public parking lots. This examination process involves three phases: Phase I Phase II Phase III Preparation of the Parking Management Study Adoption and Implementation of the Interim Action Plan Adoption of a Downtown Parking Management Plan To launch Phase I, a Request for Proposals for the preparation of the Downtown Parking Management Study (Study) was released in May 2006. A Parking Consultant Selection Committee comprised of City staff and representatives of the Third Avenue Village Association (T A V A) was established to set common goals and establish selection criteria. The Committee jointly selected Rich and Associates (RICH), an experienced parking study consultant, to prepare the Downtown Parking Management Study. The four primary objectives of the Downtown Parking Management Study are to: . Analyze the current and future parking needs and review the current parking system policies and procedures; . Formulate recommendations for addressing parking needs, including parking management, shared use opportunities and transportation modality; . Provide data necessary for developing a Parking Management Plan that efficiently and effectively utilizes parking resources in a growing community where land values are at a premium; and . Provide education and information to the public about public parking, including the cost of providing and maintaining parking. The Study began in December 2006 with the first of a series of four community meetings, fieldwork and data collection. The consultant also conducted stakeholder interviews, employee questionnaires, and additional fieldwork that resulted in the RICH Downtown Parking Management Study Final Report (Phase I). The purpose of this staff report is to present RICH's Downtown Parking Management Study Final Report and propose an Interim Action Plan (Phase II) for review and consideration. The approval of certain actions within the Interim Action Plan, including formation of a parking committee and appointing a Parking Administrator will further the process of developing the final phase of this process, which is proposing the Downtown Parking Management Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity, for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity (acceptance of the Downtown Parking Management Study; approval of the Downtown Parking District Interim Action Plan and direction to staff to prepare a Downtown Parking Management Plan) is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060 (c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Although environmental review is 8-2 NOVEMBER 13, 2007, Item~ Page 3 of 11 not necessary for this activity, once the action to implement the Interim Action Plan have been defined, environmental review may be required and a CEQA determination completed prior to commencing any projects. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chula Vista City Council approve a Resolution: a. Accepting the Downtown Parking Management Study; b. Approving the Downtown Parking District Interim Action Plan; and c. Directing staff to prepare a Downtown Parking Management Plan. Staff also recommends that the Chula Vista City Council approve an Ordinance amending Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapters 10.56 modifying parking meter rates and 10.62 modifying the overtime parking fine rate. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Downtown Parking Study and the Downtown Parking District Interim Action Plan were presented to the Redevelopment Advisory Committee as informational items on February 1,2007, and September 6,2007, respectively. The Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation reviewed the Downtown Parking Study beginning with the selection of the consultant on October 26, 2006, followed by an update on January 11,2007, presenting the Scope of Work, summarizing the results of the fust community meeting and providing a draft of the Frequently Asked Questions document prepared by staff. On August 9, 2007, the CVRC received an informational update on the major findings of the Downtown Parking Management Study and the proposed Interim Action Plan. This was followed by a unanimous recommendation on September 26, 2007, by the CVRC, to approve the Interim Action Plan and direct staff to prepare the Downtown Parking Management Plan. DISCUSSION Parking is an integral part of local efforts to improve the viability of downtown Chula Vista and is part of a transportation system that includes multi-modal opportunities, such as bicycling, public transit, and walking. Providing convenient access for employees, residents, shoppers and visitors requires supplying more than just parking spaces. It requires an effectively managed system that addresses the parking supply, operation and demand for parking. This staff report will include the following information: . History of the Downtown Parking District . Description of the Parking Study process . Proposed Downtown Parking District Interim Action Plan . Fiscal Impact Analysis 8-3 NOVEMBER 13, 2007, Item-1L- Page 4 of 11 PARKING DISTRICT mSTORY In 1963, in response to a citizen-initiated petition and pursuant to the provisions of the Parking District Law of 1951 (Part 4, Division 18, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California), the City Council created Parking District No.1. As part of that action, the Council agreed to install and maintain parking meters on certain streets and parking lots within the District from revenue generated through meter fees and parking fines. Certain City-owned parcels within the District were designated as public parking (Ordinance 829) and non-City-owned land was authorized for purchase as public parking (Ordinance 847). To provide parking within the District, the City Council, via Resolution 3115, committed to issue a bond in the sum of $360,000 for land acquisition and improvements. This bond, however, was not issued. Instead the City Council approved an as-needed allocation not-to-exceed $320,000 from the General Fund to be used as seed money for the District. In July 1963, the City Council also established the Parking District Commission (Resolution 3164). On September 24, 1985, Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 2.40 was repealed to merge the Parking Commission with the Town Centre Project Area Committee (TCPAC) (Ordinance 2129). The TCPAC continued to act in this capacity until it was formally dissolved on October 26, 2006. No new Parking District Commission was established after dissolution ofthe TCPAC. In 1980, the City Council adopted the in-lieu parking fee policy to relieve developers from having to provide on-site parking in cases where doing so would render the project economically infeasible. The in-lieu parking fee is only available in Sub-area 1 of the Town Centre I Redevelopment Project Area, which has slightly different boundaries than parking District No. 1 (Attachment 1). The in-lieu parking fee payments, including interest, resulted in total available fimds of approximately $510,000. These fimds were used to purchase additional land for public parking and to make improvements to existing public parking lots. In 1987, for the purpose of modifying the in-lieu parking fee, the City Council approved an increase in the fair market value of land from $16 per square foot to $20 per square foot and authorized staff to adjust the fair market value figures on an annual basis. However, the fee has not been adjusted since 1987 and no in-lieu parking fees have been received since 1999 due to a lack of new development. Most of the District's 1,700+ parking spaces were constructed for public use by the early 1990's. To accomplish this, the City and Redevelopment Agency expended nearly $1.2 million for land acquisition, improvements and maintenance of public parking. The table below provides a brief summary of the publicly controlled parking supply in the Downtown Parking District, including parking lots and on-street metered spaces. 8-4 NOVEMBER 13, 2007, Item~ Page 5 of 11 Public Location Number of Parkin!! Parkin!! Spaces Lot #1 E Street and Landis South . 14 Lot #2 North Landis and Davidson 75 Lot #3 South Landis and Davidson 118 Lot #4 Park Plaza 633 Lot #5 Church and Madrona South 44 Lot #6 Church and Madrona North 27 Lot #7 Center Street 70 Lot #8 Church and Del Mar 54 Lot #9 Church and Davidson South 30 Lot # 10 Church and Davidson North 34 Lot #11 E Street and Church 30 On-Street District 600 TOTAL 1729 DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY (PHASE I) To assist downtown business owners, residents, staff and decision makers in understanding the current dynamics of the downtown parking area, the Study addresses parking in the context of creating a vital and vibrant downtown. Using an analysis of current parking conditions, input from stakeholders, and an assessment of issues and conditions specific to downtown Chula Vista, the Study provides recommendations and guidance for changes to parking policies, operations, and management. The findings of the Study have provided valuable information to City staff and the public about the necessity of creating a more efficient and organized management system as part of a fully functioning and effective parking system. The following approach and related tasks were used by RICH to complete the four primary objectives of: analyzing the current and future parking needs, providing recommendations for addressing parking needs, providing data necessary for developing a parking management plan that efficiently and effectively utilizes parking resources, and providing education and information to the public: I. Parking Demand Analysis: RICH quantified and qualified the parking needs in the study area through field research and data collection, resulting in parking projections that analyze the current demand, future demand, and projects future parking needs for a period covering current to 10 years in the future. This culminated in a Findings Report that provides preliminary field research findings and analysis of the parking system. The major components of the fieldwork occurred during December 2006 when the consultant conducted two days of weekday turnover and occupancy counts in the Study Area. The counts were conducted from 9 am to 7 pm. Turnover is defmed as the number of vehicles that occupy a parking space in a particular period of time and is important because it is an indicator of whether or not the space is occupied by employees or 8-5 NOVEMBER 13, 2007, Item~ Page 6 of 11 customers. The consultant determined that Chula Vista has a low turnover rate of 2.3 compared to the average of most downtowns of 4. Ibis could indicate that employees and not enough customers are using the available parking. Occupancy is the length of time that the parking space is occupied by a vehicle and is an important measurement because it helps define how parking demand fluctuates throughout the day. Within the Study Area, the consultant concluded that the average occupancy is 57 percent, which translates into 43 percent of parking spaces unoccupied at any given time of the day. In February 2007, the consultant also conducted a permit occupancy survey in each of the ten public parking lots with ten-hour meters. Ten-hour meters are the only areas where permit holders are allowed to park. The results showed that the average occupancy of all ten-hour spaces was 79 percent, with 29 percent of these being permit holders. However, lots #9 and #10 during certain points of the day, had 100 percent occupancy, and in Lot #10,80 percent of the occupants were permit holders. Ibis data is important because it demonstrates how the location of permit parking can impact the availability of parking for customers. At the March 2007 community meeting, several business owners expressed concern regarding the results of the turnover and occupancy figures. They indicated that since December is generally the slowest time of year for downtown retail, the [mdings would be lower than normal and therefore inaccurate. To address this concern, RICH conducted a one-day limited occupancy count in March. The data collected in March supported the December findings. Based on the data collected, some of the significant findings of the field work were: . The District is not functioning at its highest capacity and requires more cohesive management and attention. . There is not enough revenue being generated to keep up with necessary maintenance and repairs. . Overall the Study Area has more parking than currently needed. . On average 43 percent of the available spaces are unoccupied. . An average of 15 percent of the vehicles observed stayed longer than the 2-hour time limit, and many of these vehicles were not ticketed due to lack of enforcement. . The Park Plaza Parking Structure is severely underutilized with average occupancy of only 34 percent. . RICH calculated a parking generation rate of2.37 spaces per 1,000 sf for all land uses, which is in line with the UCSP rate of2.0 spaces per 1,000 sf. . The study concluded that Lot #3 is not suitable for development due to high occupancy rates and its strategic location within the District. The Consultant determined that development of Lot #6 would have minimal impact on parking availability . II. Community Participation and Education: RICH conducted seven community meetings, one presentation to the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency, and 8-6 NOVEMBER 13, 2007, Item~ Page 7 of 11 Owner/Manager Interviews and Employee Surveys with local businesses and downtown employees. The Consultants' primary goals were to provide information to staff, stakeholders and the community on the efficts of not properly managing parking, the current and potential parking conditions in downtown Chula Vista, the importance of enforcement, and the potential future costs of parking. The process of preparing the Downtown Parking Management Study presented an important opportunity to further the City's goal of establishing an open and collaborative dialogue with community members and organizations. A significant amount of outreach was conducted to ensure that every interested member of the community had the opportunity to provide input and be apprised of the work that the City was pursuing. A series of community meetings were held at Community Congregational Church. Both morning and evening workshops were held to ensure the greatest opportunity for input and participation by both the business and residential community. In addition to participating in the community meetings, staff made presentations to several local organizations including the Third A venue Village Association, Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce, Northwest Civic Association and Walk San Diego. More than 100 businesses owners, tenants, residents, and community stakeholders actively participated and provided valuable input, insight and comment throughout the process. A brief summary of the purpose and focus for each community meeting is provided below: December 12. 2006 The focus of the first community meeting was for the Consultant and staff to solicit input about the management and operations of the Downtown Parking District. This dialogue included a discussion about the goals and parameters of the Parking Study, Agency development proposals, the Urban Core Specific Plan, downtown parking, in-lieu parking fees, the maintenance of parking lots and comments about other influential factors such as the types of businesses locating in the downtown. February 15.2007 This meeting was an educational presentation about the parking principles the Study would apply in its review and assessment with a description of how the parking data would be utilized to develop findings and recommendations. March 8. 2007 The findings presented to the community were largely based upon the fieldwork conducted in December 2006, which determined that overall there is a surplus of parking within the study area and that peak occupancy occurs during daytime hours. The overall average occupancy for the Study Area is 57 percent. RICH was also able to confirm, through their review of City documents, that revenue from meter funds and the in-lieu parking fee was spent on parking related activities within the District. All of the findings provided an important basis for understanding the recommendations that would be presented to the community in April. 8-7 NOVEMBER 13, 2007, ItemL Page 8 of 11 April 12. 2007 At this meeting draft recommendations were introduced to the public. Certain assets, such as the Park Plaza Parking Structure and the many paseos leading from the alleyways to Third A venue were identified as seriously underutilized assets. There were also a number of recommendations presented to address the lack of organizational structure for the management of parking. Several deficiencies were identified including a lack of revenue to make needed improvements due to a combination of low meter rates, low parking fmes and significant overhead costs. Julv 26. 2007 The purpose of this meeting was to present the Draft Downtown Parking District Interim Action Plan to the public, solicit input and feedback and engage in dialogue about the proposed process. Overall, the group supported meter rate increases but not increases to the expired meter fme or the permit fee. However, the group expressed concern that enforcement activity was not consistent. Julv 31. 2007 This community meeting was organized and requested by downtown businesses, not T AVA. Staff presented the Draft Interim Action Plan and answered questions from attendees. Overall, there was support for meter increases, but like the previous community meeting; businesses are not in favor of increasing the expired meter fine or the permit fee. There was support for increasing other fines, but the business owners felt that an increased expired meter fine would be a disincentive to customers and visitors. Community Meeting Summary The dialogue with meeting participants and business organizations has been invaluable in understanding the concerns of stakeholders and the issues that must be addressed within the Downtown Parking Management Plan (Parking Plan). The success of the Parking Plan is dependent on not just dialogue with the community but active listening and an earnest effort to find solutions that benefit the customers, visitors, businesses, residents and community in our joint efforts to revitalize our downtown. III. Final Report: RICH developed near-term, mid-term and long-term improvement recommendations, which consider and address how to improve the perception of parking, increase the parking supply through improved efficiency, parking generation rates, parking system space allocation, review of parking policies, analysis of existing parking lots, parking system management and operations improvements, and parking mitigation strategies and implementation. The Downtown Parking Management Study Final Report (Attachment I) prepared by RICH, incorporates overall management goals and considers the best practices of other cities and the parking industry. These goals include staffing required to develop and operate an effective parking management program and parking enforcement enhancements. As part of developing a comprehensive parking program, the Study also considers and makes recommendations regarding parking operations, facilities, and current and future demand. For a complete listing of findings, recommendations, 8-8 NOVEMBER 13, 2007, Item~ Page 9 of 11 implementation timeframes and financial impacts, please refer to the Downtown Parking District Recommendation Summary (Attachment 2). A significant conclusion of the Study is that ineffective management and lack of policies to address parking issues has hindered the District's ability to generate sufficient revenue to be self-sufficient. The following are key recommendations from the RICH report: . Meter and parking fine rates need to be increased to generate adequate revenue for necessary capital improvements, such as the replacement of parking meters. . One City staff person needs to be designated as Parking Administrator to coordinate parking functions and interface with the community. . Parking enforcement needs to be consistent to be effective. . Revenue generated within the District should remain with the District, as it does now, and be utilized for capital improvements. These recommendations are the basis for staffs proposed Downtown Parking District Interim Action Plan (Attachment 3) and future development of the Downtown Parking Management Plan. DOWNTOWN PARKING DISTRICT INTERIM ACTION PLAN (PHASE II) The Downtown Parking District Interim Action Plan primarily focuses on changes to management and operations, addressing significant functional changes that will provide opportunities for revenue generation to finance future improvements within the Downtown Parking District. Since the emphasis of the Interim Action Plan is to address management and increase revenue, most of the actions contained within the Action Plan carry minimal financial impact to the City. There are near term capital improvements that will require a significant financial expenditure, but until the District has an opportunity to increase its revenue, there are no funds for these improvements. These future improvements will be identified in the Management Plan (Phase III). The complete Interim Action Plan is attached with the most significant of the recommendations described below: ~ Continue to dedicate all revenue generated in the Parking District for parking improvements within the District. ~ Appoint an Interim Parking Administrator, from existing City staff, dedicated to overseeing and managing parking operations. ~ Form a Downtown Parking Advisory Committee to advise the City Council on the development and implementation of a Downtown Parking Management Plan and review ongoing operations. ~ Purchase new individual meters for on-street parking spaces and replace individual meters with multi-space machines in public parking lots. ~ Increase the expired/overtime meter fine from $12 to $25. ~ Increase parking meter rates as follows: 8-9 NOVEMBER 13, 2007, Item~ Page 10 of 11 Time Limit On-street 30 minute meter On-street 2 and 3 hour meter Current Rate $0.25 er 30 minutes $0.10 er 20 minutes $0.25 er 50 minutes $0.05 er 30 minutes $0.10 er 60 minutes $0.1 0 er 60 minutes Pro osed Rate $0.25 er 30 minutes $0.25 er 30 minutes $0.50 er 60 minutes $0.25 er 30 minutes $0.50 er 60 minutes $0.25 er 60 minutes Off-street 4 hour meter Off-street 10 hour meter All the recommendations suggested in the Interim Action Plan are essential in providing a dedicated management structure for oversight of the District and in generating additional revenue for improvements within the District. The implementation of the Action Plan is the second critical component in the City realizing an effective and functioning Downtown Parking District. DOWNTOWN PARKING DISTRICT MANAGEMENT PLAN (PHASE III) The final component of addressing the District's needs will be the preparation of a comprehensive management and implementation plan. The goals of the plan are to address existing deficiencies, identify necessary capital improvements and provide short and long-term strategies to promote the self-sufficiency of the District. The Management Plan will provide strategies that build upon the foundational changes to the management and operations of the District with the approval of the Interim Action Plan. Those strategies will address the following: . Marketing and Signage . Parking Policies . Maintenance Program . Teclmology . Parking Allocation . Park Plaza Parking Structure . Bicycle Parking The Management Plan will include recommendations to upgrade and/or implement new enhancements to the District ranging in cost from $550,000 to $1,000,000, depending upon the extent of the improvements. These projected costs include new tools for enforcement, more enforcement staff, new equipment and use of teclmology, marketing, signage, improvements to paseos, and installation of new equipment to encourage bicycling in the downtown area. Staff will work with the Parking Advisory Committee (Interim Action #5) in the preparation of the Management Plan. It is expected that this Plan will be presented to the City Council for consideration in the Spring of 2008. CONCLUSION The completion of the Downtown Parking District Management Study is a significant milestone in the City's efforts to revitalize and rejuvenate the downtown area and has 8-10 NOVEMBER 13, 2007, Item~ Page 11 of 11 helped initiate collaborative efforts between local commerce, business organizations, community members and the City. Understanding how parking impacts businesses and potential development is crucial to developing a clear and achievable plan that addresses both management and operations of the District. Parking is an important component of a thriving transportation system that includes many modes of transportation such as walking, bicycling and public transit and should be addressed as a component of this system envisioned for Chula Vista. Realizing a District that is effectively managed, generates revenue for capital improvements and maintenance, and successfully provides convenient and reasonable parking opportunities for customers, visitors and employees are the eventual objectives of this process. The approval and implementation of the Downtown Parking District Interim Action Plan provides the first opportunity to create significant changes in the District by addressing outdated parking practices and inefficiencies. This lays the groundwork for a comprehensive Downtown Parking District Management Plan that will outline additional actions necessary for achieving an efficient parking system. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found a conflict exists, in that Councilman Castaneda has property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. FISCAL IMPACT The Parking District currently generates enough revenue to pay for staff time associated with management and enforcement of the District, and the District will continue to pay for these staff costs. ATTACHMENTS I. Downtown Parking Management Study Final Report 2. Downtown Parking District Recommendation Summary 3. Downtown Parking District Interim Action Plan Prepared by: Diem Do, Senior Community Development Specialist, Community Development 8-11 Attachment 1 ING DISTRICT Rich and Associates, Inc. Parking Consultants - Planners www.richassoc.com 8-12 TaJIe ciCa1el1s Executive Summary SECTION 1 - Parking study Overview 1.1 Background................. ......................................................... ......... ........ ..1-1 1.2 Best Practices... .... ....... ........ ... ... ............ ... .... ... ..... ... ......... .... ... ..... ......... ....1-1 1.3 Scope of Services.................................................................................. ....1-3 1.4 Study Area................... ............................................................. ..... ......... ..1-5 Map 1: Study Area 1.5 Community Outreach and Participation.. ........................ .................... ...... .....1-6 1.6 History of Parking District..............................................................................1-7 Map 2: Downtown Parking District and In Lieu Fee Boundaries 1.6.1 Establishment of District.............. ............................................... ....... ....1-7 1.6.2 In Lieu Fees.................... ........ .................. ............ ................ ......... ....1-7 1.6.3 Park Plaza Parking Structure.. ........................................ ........ ......... ......1-8 1.7 Urban Core Specific Plan............................................................................1-8 SECTION 2 - Analysis 2.1 Introduction.................. ........................................................ .................. ..2-1 2.2 Parking Inventories................................................................ .................. ...2-1 2.3 Turnover and Occupancy Study.................................................... ............. ..2-2 Map 3: Parking Supply Map 2.3.1 Turnover and Occupancy Analysis.................................................... ....2-3 Map 4: December 14. 2006 Peak Hour Map 5: December 15. 2006 Peak Hour 2.3.2 Turnover Results............................................................. ................... ..2-3 Table 2B and 2C Turnover Summary Results 2.3.3 Occupancy Results............................................ ..................... ........ ....2-5 ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. =~ Parking Consultants - Planners !t.!f.~ 8-13 2.3.4 Occupancy Conclusions.............. ............. ...................................... ....2-7 2.3.5 Permit Occupancy.......... ............... .............................................. .......2-7 2.4 Parking Demand Calculation.......................... .......................................... ...2-9 Map 6 Permit Occupancy Map 7: Current Surplus Deficit 2.4.1 ENA Development Parking Demand.......................................................2-9 Map 8: ENA Development Sites 2.4.2 UCSP Parking Demand .......................................................................2-10 2.5 Parking Operations and Enforcement.. .... ............. ................ ................. ..... ..2-1 0 Table 2J: Parking Tickets Issued 2.5.1 Parking Permits............................. .................................................. ..2-11 Table 2K: Parking Permit Statistics 2.5.2 Regional Surveys............. ............... ......................................... ........ ..2-12 Table 2L: Parking Violation Benchmarking 2.5.3 Chula Vista Parking Rates. ........................................................... ......2-12 Table 2M: Meter Parking Rates Conclusion.............................................. ............. ........................ ............ ....2-13 SECTION 3 - Findings and Recommendations 3.1 Parking Management................................................................................ .3-1 3.1.0 Downtown Parking District Status and Boundaries.....................................3-1 Map 9: Proposed Parking District Boundaries 3.1.1 Parking Staff..... ..... ....... ... ... ..... ...... ... ......... ...... ... ......... ......... ... ....... ...3-2 3.1.2 Parking Enterprise Fund................................................................ ........3-3 3.1.3 Parking Education......................... .................................................... .3-3 3.2 Parking Policies....................... ............ ............ ....................................... ....3-4 3.2.0 City Parking Policies...................... .................................................... ..3-4 3.2.1 In-Lieu Fee........... ............ .............................................................. ...3-5 Table 3A: In Lieu Parking Fee Reconciliation 3.2.2 Valet Parking.... ................................................................ ...... ......... ...3-7 3.2.3 Residential Parking Permit.................................................... ............... .3-8 3.2.4 Reporting to Community................ .......................................... ......... ....3-8 3.3 Parking Operations............................. .................................................. ..... .3-8 3.3.0 Parking Revenues and Expenses.. ..... ... ......... ... ...... ... ......... ... .......... ... ....3-8 ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. ~ Parking Consultants - Planners !loAf.\! 8-14 Table 3B: Historical Parking District Parking Revenue and Fees 3.3.1 Marketing.... .................................................. ............ .............. ........ .3-9 3.3.2 Signage............. ...................................... ................................. ...3-1 0 3.3.3 Condition of Cily Parking Lots..............................................................3-14 Table 3C: Parking Lot Condition Assessment 3.3.4 Existing Parking Area Configuration.......... ........................ ................. ...3-16 3.3.5 Paseos.......................... ................................ ............. ...... .......... .....3-16 3.3.6 Validation System.......................................................................... ...3-18 3.4 Parking Enforcement.. ........ .... ..... .... ..... ... ......... .... ...... ..... ... ........ ..... ...... ....3-18 3.4.0 Parking Enforcement Staffing............................................ ................. .3-18 3.4.1 Handheld Ticket Writers..................................... ................... ..... ...... ...3-19 3.4.2 Overtime Parking Fine.................................................... ...... ....... ..... ..3-20 3.4.3 Multiple Tickets........ ............................................................ ..............3-21 3.4.4 Courtesy Ticket............................................................. ...... ............ ..3-21 3.5 Parking and Revenue Control.................................................... ......... ....... .3-22 3.5.0 On-Street Parking............. ............................... ............ .................. ....3-22 3.5.1 Off-Street Parking.................................................................... ...... ....3-23 3.5.2 Parking Rates.............. .................................................................. ...3-24 Table 3D: Existing and Proposed Meter and Permit Rates Table 3E: Projected Two-year Meter and Permit Revenues Table 3F: Parking Revenue and Expense Projection 3.5.3 Parking Allocation.......... ......................................................... ........ ..3-27 3.6 Parking Facilities......................................................................... ...... ........3-28 3.6.0 Park Plaza Parking Structure.................................................................3-28 3.6.1 Meter Color Coding....................................................... ................ ...3-30 3.6.2 Street Curbs.................. ............................................ ...................... .3-30 3.7 Bicycles as an Alternate Mode of Transportation............................................3-31 3.7.1 Bicycle Parking.... ....................................................... ........ .............. .3-31 3.8 Parking Requirements for Current and Future.................................. ...............3-34 3.8.0 Traffic Impacts.. ...... ..... ................................................................. ....3-34 3.8.1 Current Parking Analysis...................................................... .......... ......3-34 3.8.2 Potential Parking Impact of Exclusive Negotiating Agreement Sites............3-35 3.8.3 Potential Future Parking Needs with Redevelopment of Third Avenue.. .. . ... .3-36 3.8.4 Possible Parking Structure Sites.............................................................3-37 ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. ~ Parking Consultants - Planners /I-..!9! 8-15 Map 10: Potential Parking Structure Sites 3.8.5 Timing for Additional Parking Developmenl...........................................3-39 3.8.6 Parking Site/Design Decision Matrix......................................................3-40 Table 3G: Site Selection/Design Matrix 3.8.7 Parking Development Costs, Parking Improvement Costs and Financing....3.41 Conclusion Exhibits 1. Community Presentation Powerpoints 2. Table 2A-Parking Supply Summary 3. Table 2D-December 14, 2006 Occupancy Count Results 4. Table 2E-December 15. 2006 Occupancy Count Results 5. Table 2F-Permit Occupancy Results 6. Table 2G-Chula Vista Current Parking Demand Projection 7. Table 2H-Future Parking Demand with ENA Sites Developed 8. Table 21-Parking Demand Projections and Surplus or Deficits for UCSP Model 9. Table 3H-Chula Vista Findings and Recommendations Matrix ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. =:;:; Parking Consultants - Planners !\.!S~ 8-16 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rich and Associates (RICH) was retained by the City of Chula Vista to prepare a parking management study for the downtown. The four primary objectives of the study were to: . Analyze the current and future parking needs and review the current parking system policies and procedures; . Prepare recommendations for addressing parking needs, including parking management, shared use opportunities and transportation modality; . Develop a parking management plan for efficiently and effectively utilizing parking resources, and . Provide education and information to the public about public parking, including the cost of providing and maintaining parking. Rich and Associates staff began the study in December 2006. This included a complete inventory of existing parking supply and building land uses, parking turn- over and occupancy counts for on-street and off-street parking, and one public meeting to discuss the purpose of the study and then listen to comments and concerns from stakeholders. There were additional stakeholder meetings beginning January 2007; including a review of best practices in February, presentations of findings in March and presentations of recommendations in April. The following is a summary of a few of the best practices applicable to Chula Vista: . Strong parking management requires a designated leader and a parking committee made up of stakeholders and City representatives involved with parking. . Parking generation rates are moving towards requiring parking maximums as opposed to minimums. Codes based upon individual land uses are moving to a form based generation rate in which one parking ratio (generally per 1 ,000 square feet of area) is used for all land uses. . Parking signage is necessary to introduce customers and visitors to the parking system. There need to be signs prior to getting to the downtown, then similar signage that directs parkers to the parking areas and names or identifies the parking area and applicable parking rates and finally signage that directs the parker to major destinations and streets once they have exited their vehicle. . A parking system should be self-sufficient. This means that revenues are sufficient to pay for operating expenses, capital maintenance and a reserve 8-17 . fund for future projects. In general, this requires revenue generated within the District remain in the District. . Parking enforcement must be consistent. The enforcement officers must be assigned only to parking enforcement duties. Hand held technology should be used to write tickets and to enforce vehicles that are in violation. . Consistent marketing of the parking system is critical and includes branding the, newsletters, web sites, maps etc. . In a parking district there is a charge for all parking, and in general, the on- street is priced higher than the off-street. The overall findings and recommendations are: A. Manaaement and Ooerations ,. In order to address potential parking needs of future restaurants and entertainment establishments, the City should consider an ordinance controlling how valet parking should operate. 2. The in lieu fee program should be maintained, though the cost should be based on a reasonable percentage of the most recent estimate of construction cost of a structured parking space. 3. Stakeholders had questioned monies that had gone into the in lieu fund and expenditures from the fund. There appeared to be no irregularities with either the monies going into the fund or expenditures from the fund. 4. Communication between the City and stakeholders needs to be consistent with respect to the revenue and expenses of the parking system and the in-lieu fund. An annual report should be prepared the details revenue received from all sources of parking and then expenses. For the in lieu fund; revenue taken in and expenditures from the fund should be reported. 5. Parking management is disjointed with no single point of contact. Rich and Associates recommend a two-phase approach. The first phase is to form a Parking Advisor Committee, appoint someone from the City's Community Development department as the parking director, and treat parking as an enterprise fund. The second phase once the parking system matures is to consider hiring outside parking management. 6. The Downtown Parking District expired in , 999 but has continued to operate as a district since that time. Rich and Associates recommend that the parking meters remain to control parking use and to generate funds to improve the parking system. 8-18 7. Marketing of parking is a crucial element in parking operations and must be consistent. This includes for example consistent messages to employers and employees on the importance of reserving the two and three-hour spaces for customers and visitors. 8. The length of stay policy for Lots 2 and 3 should be modified from two to three- hours and permit sold specifically for parking in these lots and should be priced higher than permits in other lots. 9. Parking rates at the meters and permit rates need to be increased to assist paying for improvements and to adequately control parking. Stakeholders expressed an opinion fhat rates needed to be increased. Proposed meter rates increases vary wifh the meter length of stay. Permit rates would increase trom $54.00 per quarter to $120.00 per quarter in all lots except for lots 2 and 3. These lots would have permits sold specifically for use in these lots and the quarterly rates are recommended to be $180.00 per quarter. 10. Signage is an important element is marketing parking and for level of service provided to parkers. Parking signage that directs people to different parking areas, gives information about the type of parking available and identifies the name of the lot is necessary. Parking signage in the downtown needs to be updated and improved. 11. The paseos are resource since the majority of the off-street public parking along Third Avenue is behind buildings. The paseos need to be better identified on both the Third Avenue and parking lot side and then improved with murals and additional lighting to make them inviting and interesting 12. Bicycle parking needs to be improved and promoted. This is consistent with the UCSP vision. This should include improved bike racks with signage, marketing of this amenity to the public to enhance bicycle use and if a new parking structure is developed; including facilities in the parking structure for bicycle storage, lockers and possible showers. B. Parkina Enforcement 1. Enforcement is not consistent within the district. There needs to be enforcement from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. using routes that are covered every two hours. This may require two full time parking enforcement officers. 2. Parking fines should increase to $50.00, which brings Chula Vista's fines in line with recommendations from the Parking Violation Penalty Schedule as prepared by the San Diego Parking Penalties Executive Committee in June 2005. In addition, issue courtesy tickets to first time offenders that identify where longer term parking, such as the Park Plaza parking structure, is available. 8-19 3. The handheld ticket writers used by enforcement should be upgraded so that they can be used to enter in plate numbers to track vehicles moving from two-hour space to two-hour space during the day and to track vehicles with unpaid parking tickets. C. Parkina and Revenue Control ,. On-street meters are in poor condition and need to be replaced. In four parking lots, multi-space meters are recommended instead of individual meters. D. Parkina Facilities ,. There are several parking lots that are in need resurfacing and other minor repairs. Overall, signage within the parking areas needs to be improved. Lighting in several lots needs to be repaired and upgraded. Landscaping needs to be maintained so that it does not provide a place for people to hide. 2. The Park Plaza parking structure is an underutilized asset. In order to make it more attractive to parkers the signage and lighting needs to be improved, a study made of the conditions of the facility and then physical repairs made to the structure and possibly an elevator added to the north side. E. Parkina Reauirements ,. Rich and Associates developed parking generation rates for land uses in Chula Vista based on surveys of businesses and employees and on the results of the occupancy studies. It was determined that a formed based parking generation rate was consistent with the land uses in the study area and with best practices. 2. Rich and Associates' analysis of parking spaces required for individual land uses supports the formed based parking generation factor of 2.37 spaces per , ,ODD square feet for all land uses. This finding supports the 2.0 formed based parking generation rate identified in the UCSP. 3. Currently there is an overall parking surplus in the district, though there were several blocks that did show deficits. With the changes proposed in the report such as better utilization of the Park Plaza parking structure, there is sufficient parking today. 4. While currently there is a surplus of parking in the district, the possibility of development of ENA sites will eliminate parking in the district. a. ENA development on Lot 3 will eliminate existing parking spaces that have a high occupancy rate and are central to many businesses on Landis and Third Avenue. Maintain Lot 3 as a public parking lot if the occupancy continues to be high after the 8-20 recommended changes to the lot and to the Park Plaza parking structure. b. With ENA development on Lot 6. the City should pursue the Baptist Church parking lot next to Lot 6. since the development planned would not allow for replacement public parking to be developed on the site. c. ENA development of Lot 9 or , 0 will require displaced parkers to use Lots 8 and 11 . 5. With maximum build-out of Third Avenue in the future based on the UCSP, there is a potential shortfall of about 500 parking spaces although a significant amount of new square footage could be developed without negatively impacting the amount of available parking. 6. Three sites were identified for potential parking sites if required in the future: . Site' Block 6: The vacant lot on the east side of Third between G and Alvarado Streets. . Site 2 Block 4: Baptist Church lot in combination with Lot 7. . Site 3 Block' : West side of Church between E and Davidson Streets. For any of these sites the City should consider a mixed-use facility that would include ground floor commercial uses and possible residential units above the parking structure. SummarY In summary, the parking in Chula Vista needs to be operated as a parking system. There is positive momentum in the downtown. and as projects develop there will be the need for stronger parking management and enforcement. There needs to be a collaborative effort between the City and stakeholders with respect to the overall parking planning, operation and communications. In order to monitor the parking system and to fine tune the recommendations contained herein. we strongly recommend that the study be updated every two years to monitor changes in land uses and densities. parking utilization. enforcement and communications. 8-21 Chula Vista Downtown Parking study SectIon One - Parking Study OVervIew 1.1 Background This study, prepared for the City of Chula Vista's downtown, serves to examine the existing parking system from both a qualitative and quantitative standpoint. The City of Chula Vista contracted Rich and Associates (RICH) to prepare a parking planning study which would inventory and review the existing parking and make recommendations regarding the development of potential future parking. A number of issues were examined including operations, management, in-lieu of parking fees, enforcement, current and future parking demand, development scenarios, and future parking needs. For this project, RICH initiated the process with a field study, meetings and stakeholder interviews. Data collected as background material was analyzed using methods that involve statistical analysis and survey feedback from user groups. The study drew on standards developed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and the Urban land Institute (UlI). which were modified as necessary according to the survey results from Chula Vista in order to suit the unique circumstances present in the downtown. Considerations for this study include levels of development/redevelopment, the number of restaurants and banquet halls, specialty retail stores and the planned development of residential units in the downtown. Within the primary stUdy area, which encompassed the parking district plus additional area, the parking supply consists of a mix of on-street and off-street parking. The on- street spaces are primarily metered with a small number of spaces signed with time restrictions. The off-street parking supply consists of a mix of surface parking and two parking structures; one public and one privately owned. The majority of the parking supply within this area is publicly provided by the city with several smaller lots privately controlled by individual businesses. 1 .2 Best Practices RICH presented information on Parking Best Practices and Strategies to the community at the February 2007 public meeting. This presentation represented the most effective practices that other communities have successfully planned, implemented and managed to address their parking needs. In summary, the most relevant Best Practices applicable to Chula Vista are: . Strong parking management requires a designated leader and a parking committee made up of stakeholders and City representatives involved with parking. =- ~~ RiCh and Associates, Inc. ~ Parking Consultants-Planners 8-22 1-1 Final Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study . Parking generation rates are moving towards requiring parking maximums as opposed to minimums. Codes based upon individual land uses are moving to a form based generation rate in which one parking ratio (generally per , ,000 square feet of area) is used for all land uses. . Parking signage is necessary to introduce customers and visitors to the parking system. There need to be signs prior to getting to the downtown, then similar signage that directs parkers to the parking areas and names or identifies the parking area and applicable parking rates and finally signage that directs the parker to major destinations and streets once they have exited their vehicle. . A parking system should be self-sufficient. This means that revenues are sufficient to pay for operating expenses, capital maintenance and a reserve fund for future projects. In general, this requires revenue generated within the District remain in the District. . Parking enforcement must be consistent. The enforcement officers must be assigned only to parking enforcement duties. Hand held technology should be used to write tickets and to enforce vehicles that are in violation. . Consistent marketing of the parking system is fundamental and should include branding the parking, newsletters, web sites, maps etc. . In a parking district there is a charge for all parking, and in general, the on- street is priced higher than the off-street. -~ =-;:: Rich and Associates, Inc. !i.lf.!! Parking Consultants-Planners 8-23 1-2 Final Chula VIsta Downtown Parking study 1.3 Scope of Services Phase One of developing the Downtown Parking Management Study involves quantifying and qualifying the parking needs in the study area to determine the parking. This was done through fieldwork. utilization studies. surveys and a series of public and stakeholder meetings. The flow chart below details the process. Parking needs analysis ~ =~ Rich and Associates, Inc. !\.!fli Parking Consultants.Planners 8-24 1.3 Final ~ ==~ !tu:;:ti Chula VIsta Downtown ParkIng S1udy Phase Two of the Downtown Parking Management Study involves reviewing the current parking system, the existing parking facilities, parking policy, parking signage, way finding, and enforcement. RICH then develops recommendations for short and long term parking improvements that combine the parking system and management improvements with capital improvements as needed. The flow chart below details the process. Preliminary Program Sit\> Analysis Design Analysis System Analysis Rich and Associates, Inc. Parking Consultants-Planners 8-25 1-4 Final Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study 1.4 Study Area The study area, as determined by the City of Chula Vista and RICH, is illustrated in the Map I (Study Area Map) located on the following page. RICH evaluated the parking conditions, supply and activity of the IS-block study area. The study area was divided into a primary area (the blocks north of "G" street) as well as a secondary study area, which are the blocks between G and H Streets. Though not In the study area, the transit focus areas (H and E Street stations) were evaluated as part of the turnover and occupancy analysis since they are part of the transit operation. RICH reviewed transit usage based on statistics provided by the City's Public Works Transit Administration Department. In general, over the last year there has been a five percent increase in ridership on Third Avenue between E and H Streets. This increase in ridership is a positive indicator that the goal to promote other modes of transportation as envisioned by the UCSP is achievable. This is a factor that was considered by RICH when formulating the formed based parking generation factor discussed in Section 2.4 of this report. This information is important since one of the goals of the city is to enhance alternate modes of transportation and promote the use of other available modes of transportation such as buses, trolley, bicycling and walking. The bus and trolley lines are fundamental options for customers and visitors to the downtown that decrease the need for driving and parking. The study area consists of a mix of land uses including residential, retail, restaurants, small homes that have been converted into businesses, a government use (Social Security Office that will be relocating from this site). medical and dental offices. The number of medical and dental offices in the study area is unusual for a downtown. This land use type has a different dynamic in terms of the number of spaces needed per I ,000 square feet and the needs of patients to walk from parking to the medical office. The study area also includes several larger commercial buildings at the southern end and several storefronts that have been converted into banquet facilities along the Third Avenue corridor. This mix of land uses is fairly typical in medium sized downtowns with the exception of the banquet facilities. The banquet facilities are important since in general their parking demands are in the evenings and on weekends. Therefore, they have less of an impact to parking during the weekday daytime hours when parking demands in downtown Chula Vista are typically higher, but a higher impact on nights and weekends, when the parking demands in downtown Chula Vista area are lower. In addition to the existing land uses, RICH considered the impact on parking that the 24 Hour Fitness facility might have since this use is expected to open in Summer 2007 in the former theater location on Third Avenue. Based on our experience, the peak demand for this type of facility is early morning and evening. This should not significantly impact Chula Vista's parking availability since this is typically when ~ ~~ Rich and Associates, Inc. ~ Parking Consultants-Planners 8-26 1-5 Final ---I ~~ . ~ I PARKHAY ST. q~ n LJbd~---.1 '!;"ST f 1 1 @I @ 1 1 1 .. . f . 18 I @ I 1 I I T f . 1 I 1 e 100 I 1 I . T. 1 @ 1 . 1 1 @ T. 1 1..8 1 1 1 T 1 ~~ el----- 01 I. I 1 . 1 1 1 1 @ 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 e 1 1 1 I" I . . ST ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ @i ~ @ ~ I I -- 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 f 1 1 @ ill T. @ 1 I @ T. -L - - - _ -- _ _I_/- -__.I H : e ~ I ~; i~~))) ! ::!J I. Ii '11', '1'1 l> m ~. ur ~~ ~ )> ill !!!;. i~ i i" ~"U 2! ~! r! , 8-27 ~! ~ ~ "l~ . ~ 22l~ C:Jl:Jl !;~~ smO ~()~ l>~o ~-< Chula VIsta Downtown Parking study parking demand for the District is lower. The existing and future mix of uses was evaluated and considered in our assessment of the overall District and Study Area. 1.5 Community Outreach and Participation RICH conducted a series of four community meetings where input and information regarding parking issues was gathered. In addition, there were individual and group meetings between members of RICH staff and local organizations and stakeholders to discuss parking issues. RICH also conducted a business manager survey and an employee survey. This provided RICH with information from businesses in Chula Vista that was then used to calculate parking generation rates specific to Chula Vista and not just based on a national average. Following is a summary of the meetings that were held and the SUbjects covered: Community Meetinas . December 12, 2006: Morning public meeting to present the project approach, schedule and to gather comments by community and stakeholders on specific parking issues. . February 15, 2007: Presentation of an overview of Parking Best to community and stakeholders in a morning and evening meeting. . March 8, 2007: Presentation of findings from fieldwork and investigation to community and stakeholders in a morning and evening meeting. . April 12, 2007: Presentation of preliminary recommendations to the community and stakeholders in a morning and evening meeting. Stakeholder Meetinas . Week of December 11, 2006: Meetings with individual stakeholders in two public meetings to discuss the study process and to gather comments on parking issues. . January 11 and 12, 2007: Meetings with specific stakeholder groups including Third Avenue Village Association (TAVA) , Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce, and Landis property owners to discuss specific issues that these groups have and understand their perspectives. A copy of each of the Power Point presentations distributed at the community meetings is included as Exhibit 1 (PowerPolnt Presentallons) at the end of the report. =- ~~ Rich and Associates, Inc. RiCH Parking Consultants-Planners ...."""".. 8-28 1-6 Final Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study 1.6 History of Parking District 1.6.1 Establishment of a District (cited from information provided by Diem Do, City of Chula Vista) In 1963, in response to a citizen-initiated petition, the City Council created the Downtown Parking District (DPD) under provisions of the California Parking District Law of 1951. The goal was to promote the development of public parking in the core downtown. The DPD encompasses an area surrounding Third Avenue, roughly from E Street to G Street and one and a half blocks east and west of Third Avenue. It was at this time that parking meters were installed on some streets in the DPD. Certain city owned properties, as well as privately owned properties that were acquired for parking, were designated for parking development. Funding for the DPD came from a transfer of $320,000 from the City's general fund. This was used to establish the Parking District NO.1 Acquisition and Improvement Fund (PDAIF). In forming the DPD, the City agreed to maintain parking meters for 36 years or that portion of 36 years that there is remaining interest or prinCiple on the bonds. Bonds were never issued, but the initial allocation of General Fund money was approved by ordinance to act as the bond issuance. The DPD did function as it was intended, although there was no assessment levied to property owners and no bonding of District monies. Technically, the DPD's obligation to maintain meters and designate funds generated within the District for parking-related expenses expired in 1999. The City has continued to maintain the district and utilize all of the revenue for administration and maintenance. 1.6.2 In-Lieu Fees In 1980 the City adopted in-lieu fee policy for Sub Area 1 of the Town Centre 1 Project Area. The Town Centre 1 Project Area has different boundaries than the Parking District, although it encompasses a great deal of the DPD. Please refer to Map 2 pn- Ueu Fee Boundary Map) located on the following page for a comparison of the District and In-Lieu Fee Policy boundaries. The in-lieu policy states that instead of providing on-site parking, developers in Sub Area 1 have the option of paying a fee, which relieves the developer from providing the required on-site parking. The fee was not intended to guarantee anyone specific parking areas or spaces within those areas. The fees collected under this policy are to be used for the purchase or development of parking sites which benefit the Sub Area. In 1987, the City granted the Redevelopment Agency the ability to use the in-lieu fee revenue to acquire or develop land for public parking. ~ . ~~ RiCh and Associates. Inc. ~ Parking Consultants-Pianners 8-29 1-7 Final n . . .. Downtown Parking District Town Centre I In-Lieu Parking Area Downtown Parking Districts and In Lieu Fee Boundaries Map 2 8-30 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study The in-lieu fee is based upon the number of required parking spaces for the development multiplied by 350 square feet and then multiplied by 25% of the fair market value of the land all divided by four. The land value figure currently utilized in this calculation is $20.00 per square foot. The formula is: 1.6.3 Number of spaces reauired x 350 x 25% of fair market value 4 Park Plaza Parking Structure Around 1984 the City constructed the Park Plaza parking structure located at the intersection of F Street and Third Avenue. The structure contains approximately 633 parking spaces and is free to the public and provides parking for the adjacent property owners. Under an agreement with the adjacent property owners, the City paid for all of the construction and finance costs on the condition that the property owners pay the City defined flat rates and percentage payments for the use of the parking structure. Payments were established for a period of 33 years. The property owners are responsible for ongoing maintenance and housekeeping of the parking structure and the City is responsible for the capital repairs. 1.7 Urban Core Specific Plan (Cited from a document prepared by Diem Do, CiIy of Chula VisIa) The Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP) is a zoning document that was adopted recently by the City that follows the general direction of the City's General Plan. It establishes a detailed vision, guidelines and regulations for the Urban Core. The adopted UCSP contains parking standards, similar to those of other communities where increased mobility by all modes is encouraged. The UCSP contains guidelines concerning parking and transit that focus on creating a more pedestrian oriented downtown core. The UCSP proposes changes that will increase densities, widen sidewalks, reduce traffic lanes and institute bike lanes, thus creating a pedestrian oriented core with intensified transportation routs linking people to the downtown. Once a person is in the downtown core, walking becomes the preferred method of transportation, rather than driving and parking to each destination. This fulfills the "Park once shop twice" mentality. Foundational to the UCSP is promoting the pedestrian first, then bicycles, transit and automobiles. The USCP places a strong significance on a transportation plan that is well linked to multiple modes of transportation. This plan places importance on H Street serving as the transportation node to pedestrian movement on Third Avenue. This approach takes the priority from the car and places it on the pedestrian thus changing the number of single vehicle trips, slightly reducing the number of parking stalls needed in the downtown, and creating a more pedestrian oriented downtown core. :~ =~ !il~!! Rich and Associates, Inc. Parking Consultants-Planners 8-31 1-8 Final -- , Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study Section Two - Analysis 2.1 Introduction Analyses were performed to determine the current and future parking demands and general parking needs for the study area taking into consideration the goals and vision of the Urban Core Specific Plan. Also, research was conducted to determine how the parking was being operated and how elements related to parking were being used. The data collected and compiled by RICH included; . An inventory of on and off-street parking supplies in the study area . Turnover and occupancy studies for public and private on and off-street parking areas . Permit parking occupancy study for off-street public parking areas . Block-by-block analysis of the square footage and use of every building in the core study area. The footprint of each building was scaled and estimated from an aerial photograph and cross referenced with RICH field notes regarding land use and the number of floors per building to determine an approximate gross floor area for each building. It should be noted that this methodology does not result in precise reporting of square footage of land use . Review of the conditions of each parking area . Review of signage, graphics and way finding as it relates to parking . Meetings with City staff and stakeholders to discuss parking operations and policies 2.2 Parking Inventory Based on RICH's research we believe that if a city is going to successfully manage a parking program that it is desirable to have public control of at least 50 percent of the parking supply. This allows the city to effectively manage the parking in terms of allocation and market pricing. Within both the total stUdy area and within the primary stUdy area, the city meets or exceeds the control criteria. City control of over half or more of parking in the downtown also allows the parking to be enforced with more efficiency when properly performed. With proper management and enforcement, parking can also be used as an economic incentive. This allows the city to respand to use changes in the downtown and work with development proposals more effectively. In the Study Area, there are a total of 3,551 parking spaces, and of these, 625 are on-street, 1,193 are public off-street and 1,732 are private off-street parking. The on- street parking consists of 11 different types of spaces. These include unrestricted =s ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. B:!8! Parking Consultants - Planners 2-1 Final 8-32 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study parking, metered spaces ranging from 15-minute time limits to ten-hour time limits and one or two-hour time limit free parking. Within the total study area, the City of Chula Vista controls 51 percent of the parking in the downtown. Within the primary study area, Which includes the blocks north ot G Street, the percentage of spaces the city controls rises to 76 percent. On the following page is Map 3 (Partdng Supply Map), illustrating the existing parking supply in the Study Area. For details on the actual parking supply in the downtown study area refer to Exhibit 2 (Table 2A-Partdng Supply Summary). The information contained in Exhibit 2 is based upon actual counts by RICH staff. In most cases, the parking spaces could be definitively counted. In some cases though, the number of parking spaces was estimated, especially where spaces were not well marked. 2.3 Turnover and Occupancy Study Initially, turnover and occupancy counts were undertaken in the downtown study area over the course of two consecutive business days in December to compare and contrast how parking use varied. This was followed up by a specific analysis of permit parking in city off-street lots, and then a one day limited occupancy count in March to assure RICH that the original counts that were conducted in December were not underestimating the parking usage. The following are definitions used for the turnover and occupancy analysis: . Turnover - Turnover is the number of vehicles that occupied a parking space in a particular period. For example, if a parking lot has 100 spaces and during the course of the day 250 different vehicles occupied the lot, then the turnover is two and a half times (2.5). . Occupancy - Occupancy represents the number of spaces occupied at each period or circuit. . Circuit - A circuit refers to the two-hour time period between observances of anyone particular parking space. For the turnover and occupancy study, a defined route was developed for each survey vehicle. One circuit of the route took approximately two hours to complete and each space was observed once during that circuit. . Block Face - A number was assigned to each block within the study area. Each block is then referenced by its block number and by a letter (A, B, C or D). The letter refers to the cardinal face of the block; with (A) being the north face, (B) the east face, (C) the south face and (D) the west face. Therefore, a block designated as 1 A would refer to the north face of block 1 . The turnover portion of the analysis, where license plate numbers were recorded, applied to city controlled on-street and off-street spaces with time limits less than ten- hours to determine how long individual vehicles where parked in certain spaces and if they were moving their vehicles to avoid being cited for overtime parking. In the ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. ~S!! Parking Consultants - Planners 2-2 Final 8-33 ,-- ;11.. ~ n · ~ _ l! > ~ iS;;I ~ l! ~ II I II ; ~ p m " :;; m ~~. ~~~ ~ o~ 8~ q~ ~ . ~ ~ S - ~ e H Q I~ ~J)) e ~~ 7< e 02j"1l i!5 :J: l> ~ C::Jl:Jl I ~ l!II'''fF ! >~~ ~ " 'I ,,~. . ~mG> . 1 J\oI I 11;; - ! iil: ~i i 'l: Ii il l>~~ . ~ 9 Ii O~ " Chula VIsta Downtown Parking S1udy ten-hour metered spaces and in private off-street spaces, the number of parking spaces occupied was observed during each two-hour circuit. The turnover information also yields an occupancy result for the parking area and therefore for each circuit a composite occupancy was derived. Turnover is an indicator of how offen a parking stall is being used by different vehicles throughout the course of the day. Turnover is relevant to time periods when parking meter limitations (or time limits for non metered spaces) are being enforced and is most important to short-term customer and visitor parking. Occupancy is an important aspect of parking because it helps us to understand the dynamic of how parking demand fluctuates throughout the day. Likewise, the occupancy can be used to illustrate how parking demand is impacted by events in the downtown area. Overall, the occupancy data was used by RICH to calibrate the parking demand model. 2.3.1 Turnover and Occupancy Analysis (December 14 and December 15, 2006) The turnover and occupancy analysis took place during a span of two days: Thursday, December 14, 2006, and Friday, December 15, 2006. The first circuit began at 9:00 A.M. with the final circuit beginning at 7:00 P.M. The analysis covered public and private parking in and around Chula Vista's downtown core. These typical business days were selected to determine Chula Vista's turnover rate and to understand how employee-parking utilization was impacting the parking operations. Turnover was recorded from 9:00 A.M. through 7:00 P.M. Although a circuit began at 7:00 P.M., metered spaces are only enforced through 6:00 P.M.; therefore from 5:00 P.M. until 7:00 P.M. public and private parking was counted for an occupancy analysis only, no license plates were recorded. During the turnover analysis, license plate numbers were recorded in virtually all on-street spaces and the municipal lot spaces that were restricted to less than ten-hour parking. Following are Map 4 (December 14. 2006 Peak Hour) and Map 5 (December 15. 2006 Peak Hour) illustrating the peak hour demand observed during the two-day turnover and occupancy counts. 2.3.2 Turnover Results On-Street 2-Hour Soaces On-street spaces should have shorter parking time limits to encourage turnover and provide enough availability for customers and visitors to the downtown area. Since on-street spaces are the most visible they are generally considered to be the most convenient. Ultimately, a parking district should provide enough shorter-term on- street parking that is appropriately priced so that parkers are discouraged from circling to look for parking and will consider parking that may be further away and ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. !l!\;!;! Parking Consultants - Planners 2-3 Final 8-35 q~ I I ~ ~ rll S . ~ e e d ()~"'1l .. Ii ~ ~ i~ ~))) E Si ~ ~ O~ol() ~2 m >J!Z5 , ~ ~ ~ a ./lo., ' I ~ ~i ~~n IU ~mi5 i!~'l:- ~~~ " ~ tl i3~-~; a& - ~()~ if ~ ~I!i' ~ i i >~ ~ ~ s ~ H i= !~ !! ~~ ~ ~~ ;l ~ ~~ ~ , ~ ~ !; i ~ ~ . . 9 ~ 9 II e ~ i ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~:D ~ lr ~ 11 i~ VJJJ 1"""j" " ,'i' .. f ;1 1I~"'! if: ~ ,fil'; a, iO Ish II U P' ~i ;j ~ ?i~~ t ' " R~ I ~...Jl:3>- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ !i:~~ smC ~g~ o ~-< Chula VIsta Downtown Parking study less expensive. These short-term spaces would be most attractive to those visiting the area for a specific purpose, such as eating at a particular restaurant, running an errand or keeping an appointment with a specific provider in the area. There were 1,123 vehicles observed parking in two-hour on-street spaces on the Thursday December 14, 2006, survey date. Of the vehicles observed, 14 percent of the vehicles parked at two-hour on-street meters were staying beyond the legal limit on the Thursday survey date. There were 1,124 vehicles observed in on-street spaces on the Friday survey date. The results of the Friday survey were very similar to the results found on the Thursday survey for the two-hour spaces except that there was a slight increase to about 1 7 percent who stayed longer than two hours. An acceptable rate for overtime parking is approximately three percent. Therefore, Chula Vista has an unacceptably high percentage of overtime parkers. This is likely related to inconsistent enforcement. It is possible that some of the vehicles were observed twice in the same parking spot (overtime parking) though they may not have exceeded the time limit. This would have occurred if a vehicle parked just before it was observed and then left just after the surveyor had passed the second time. We believe this occurred infrequently. Another factor to consider is the turnover of spaces. Depending on occupancy levels, we would normally expect a maximum turnover rate of four for two-hour spaces. For the Thursday count, the turnover rate was 2.41 times, and during the Friday count the turnover rate was 2.27 times. The observed rates for both days appears reasonable, although the data collected during both days indicates that Chula Vista is on the lower end of the turnover spectrum. Off-Street 4-Hour Soaces Off-street parking that has a longer time limit serves a different purpose than on-street spaces with shorter time limits. Off-street spaces should be priced at lower meter rates to encourage their use by customers and visitors who plan to stay in the area for a longer period of time to potentially explore, shop and dine. The four-hour metered spaces in off-street lots were observed for turnover as was the lot adjacent to Fuddruckers and the metered spaces off the alleys. On the Thursday, December 14, 2006, survey date about 12 percent of the vehicles parking at four- hour meters stayed longer than four hours. This percentage is higher than what is typically acceptable. On the Friday survey only four percent stayed longer than four hours. The turnover in these spaces on Thursday was 2.32 times, which was very close to the on-street ratio observed for the two-hour spaces. ~ ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. ~ Parking Consultants - Planners 2-4 Final 8-38 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study Tables 28 (December 14. 2006 Tumover Summary) and 2C (December 15. 2006 Tumover Summary) provide a summary of the turnover count conducted on December 14-15. 2006. For the complete results of the Turnover and Occupancy counts. please refer to Exhibit 3 (Table 2D-December 14. 2006. Turnover and Occupancy Table) and Exhibit 4 (Table 2E-December 15. 2006. Turnover and Occupancy Table) at the end of the report. Table 28 Turnover Summary December 14, 2007 Parking Turnover Summary (by type) On.Street & Off-Street Parking Off-Street Parkjng 2hr carlOno 4hr oarkina Vehicles that remained 2 hours or less 964 (86%) 316 (73%) Vehicles that remained between 2 and 4 hours 108 (10%) 67 (15%) Vehicles that remained between 4 and 6 hours 30 (3%) 18 (4%) Vehicles that remained between 6 and 8 hours 12(1%) 19(4%) Vehicles that remained between 8 and 10 hours 9 (0.8%) 13 (4%) Total number of vehicles analyzed 1,123 433 Source: Rich and Associates Field Observations, December 14, 2007 Table 2C Turnover Summary December 15, 2007 Parking Turnover Summary (by type) On-Street & Off-Street Parking Off-Street Parkjng 2hr carkjna 4hr oarkina Vehicles that remained 2 hours or less 929 (83%) 468 (90%) Vehicles that remained betNeen 2 and 4 hours 121 (11%) 34(6%) Vehicles that remained between 4 and 6 hours 29(3%) 9 (2%) Vehicles that remained between 6 and 8 hours 28(2%) 6(1%) Vehicles that remained between 8 and 10 hours 17(1%) 3(1%) Total number of vehicles analyzed 1,124 520 Source: Rich and Associates Field Observatioos, December 15, 2007 2.3.3 Occupancy Results The occupancy results for Thursday and Friday, December 14 and 15. 2006. were the following: Thursdav, December 14, 2006 . The peak occupancy for all on-street parking in the study area for Thursday peaked at 65 percent between 3:00 P.M. and 5:00 P.M. . The public off-street parking peaked at 60 percent on Thursday and occurred from11 :00 A.M. to 1 :00 P.M. ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. !\!\;.t\ Parking Consultants - Planners 2-5 Final 8-39 Chute Vista Downtown Parking Study . On the Thursday survey date, the 3:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. circuit was only slightly greater than the 11 :00 A.M. circuit with 53 percent occupied for the private off-street spaces. . Using a compasite of all parking areas, the Thursday survey day had peak occupancy of 57 percent, which occurred from 11 :00 A.M. to 1 :00 P.M. Fridav. December 15. 2006 . The peak occupancy for all on-street parking in the study area for Friday peaked at 64 percent but this occurred during two time periods: the 1 :00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. circuit and the 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. circuit. . The public off-street parking peaked at 59 percent on Friday and occurred from 1 :00 P.M. to 3:00 P. M. . On the Friday survey date, the 11 :00 A.M. to 1 :00 P.M. circuit was the peak occupancy period at 58 percent for the private off-street spaces. . The Friday survey day had a higher overall occupancy of 55 percent, which occurred from 11 :00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. Park Plaza . The Park Plaza parking structure had peak occupancy of only 41 percent on Thursday from 11 :00 A.M. to 1 :00 P.M. . The average occupancy of Park Plaza during the daytime was only 34 percent. With a total of 645 spaces in and around the structure, this represents an underutilized resource. Public Parkina Lots . Lot 2 peaked at 88 percent occupied on the Thursday survey date and 86 percent on the Friday date. . Lot 3 peaked at 77 percent occupied on the Thursday survey date and 87 percent on the Friday date. . Lot 5 achieved 1 00 percent occupancy on both survey dates. . Lot 8 peaked at 87 percent on Thursday but only 67 percent on the Friday date. . Lot 9 peaked at 90 percent during the 1 :00 to 3:00 P.M. circuit on the Thursday date and achieved 1 00 percent occupancy on the Friday survey date during the 9:00 A.M. to 11 :00 A.M. circuit ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. !\:~t! Parking Consultants - Planners 2-6 Final 8-40 Chula Vista Downtown Parking study RICH also prepared an update to the occupancy counts on March 8, 2007 since it was believed that the counts taken in December might be lower due to the holiday season. The data collected determined that the occupancies were very similar between the December 14111 and 151112006, counts and the March 8, 2007, count. Therefore, the December, 2006 survey dates were considered to be an average period. 2.3.4 Occupancy Conclusions . For both survey days the average occupancy during the daytime was about 57 percent. . The on-street spaces had varying peak occupancies on both survey days. . The municipal lots had slightly higher occupancy during the daytime hours on the Thursday survey date compared to the Friday survey date. On Friday, the evening occupancy was higher. . The Park Plaza parking structure (identified as Lot #4 in the occupancy results) is grossly underutilized. At peak time it only reached 41 percent occupancy. . Based on the occupancies that were observed for the three count days and Rich and Associates experience in other downtowns, we believe that there would be a variance of approximately five percent to the overall peak occupancy of 64 percent that was observed during the counts. This means that we would expect occupancy of 69 percent to occur at the non-special event or holiday peak time. 2.3.5 Permit Occupancy The City of Chula Vista currently provides permit parking, which allows an employer or employees to prepay for parking in designated areas, currently 10-hour meters. The benefit to maintaining this program is that it provides the City with upfront revenue, and when a 10-hour meter is unoccupied, the parking space can be used by another non-permit vehicle. This results in additional revenue to the City in addition to the permit fee received. A separate survey was undertaken specifically to examine permit occupancy. This task was completed on Thursday, February 15, 2007. For this survey, four circuits of each of the ten municipal lots that had ten-hour meters was completed. A parking permit displayed in a vehicle allows holders to park at ten-hour meters without paying the meter. Observers recorded the occupancy of the ten-hour spaces as well as what proportion had permits. The results of the analysis of the 319 ten-hour meters showed that 78 percent of the ten-hour meters were occupied during the two morning circuits with a maximum of 32 percent of those occupied spaces having permits. The results tor the afternoon circuits peaked with 83 percent of the ten-hour spaces occupied but only about 25 ~ ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. MS\! Parking Consultants - Planners 2-7 Final 8-41 Chula Vista Downtown Parking study percent having permits. It should be noted that the survey date coincided with the weekly Farmer's Market that is open every Thursday from 4-7 P.M. on Center Street and Church Avenue. Lots 9 and 1 0 had 1 00 percent occupancy of the ten-hour meters at certain points of the day. In lot 10, there was an average of 80 percent with permits. For the ten municipal lots included in the analysis, the average occupancy of the ten-hour spaces was 80 percent during the four circuits. On average 29 percent of these were permit-holders. On the next page is Map 6 (Permit Occupancy), illustrating the results of the Permit Occupancy study conducted on February 15, 2007. The complete results of the analysis are included as Exhibit 5 (Table 2F-PelmIt Occupancy Results Table). 2.4 Parking Demand Calculation This section of the report reviews the projections of current and future parking demand in the study area. For the current condition, RICH completed a building inventory and then estimated the amount of square footage by land use for each block. In order to calculate the parking demand for each block, different land uses for each block are in general, multiplied by a parking generation rate specific for that land use. RICH completed this using parking generation rates that were based on; the results of the business manager and employee surveys in Chula Vista, RICH's experience with parking studies, ULI data and ITE data. This process yields a set of parking generation rates that are customized specifically to Chula Vista. The ultimate goal however, was to developed a form-based parking generation rate for Chula Vista. The form based parking generation rate is one rate for all land uses that takes into account the existing parking generation rates but then makes adjustments based on facts such as different land uses have different parking needs based on the time of the day. As an example, restaurants typically require more parking during the evening. Conversely, offices need less parking in the evening when restaurants are at their peak. These examples demonstrate how shared parking could serve two different uses. Both of these adjustments are used to calculate the number of parking spaces needed. In addition, the level of alternate mode is a factor in the adjustment. The Urban Core Specific plan anticipated a form based parking generation rate of 2.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of land use. RICH determined a rate of 2.37 spaces per 1 ,000 square feet for all land uses in our model. While the ratio we determined was higher than the 2.0 rate proposed by the UCSP, we believe that the results support the UCSP ratio of 2.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet. ~ ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. !'-ls;,~ Parking Consultants - Planners 2-8 Final 8-42 ~~ ~ q~ ~ ~ - '" !'" II e ~ 't ril ~ e & ; ~ e i~ ~))) ~ . 0 ! !'~!!j !F >' 3 c: ~ :;;, ~:~, =f - S" i h ~~..~.. 0 ~:: ;'''Uil i " i5 !: Ii 3 -< ' ~~~~ t ' ' , ~...J~- ~~~ ~ i (')~-o :I: )> c: ::0 s::~~ sm" ~(')cg )>~e ~-< Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study Rich applied the 2.37 rate to all existing land uses on each block of the study area. Map 7 (Current Surplus and Deftclt Map) illustrates the block-by block surplus or deficit of parking which takes the parking supply for a specific block and subtracts the calculated demand to arrive at a surplus or defiCit. Please consult Exhibit 6 (Table 2G-Chula VIsta Current Parking Demand Projection) for the Parking Demand Analysis matrix table, which summarizes the parking demand calculated by block for the study area. Using the 2.37 ratio for the overall study area, there is a calculated surplus of 1,293 spaces based on current conditions. However, this conclusion is based on the entire study area. Map 6 illustrates the surplus or deficit of parking on each block in the study area. The map illustrates that there are two blocks with particularly large surpluses: Block 8 has a surplus of 621 spaces (Gateway Office Development) and Block 11 has a surplus of 518 spaces (Park Plaza parking structure). There are specific blocks that have deficits. Those blocks are 2,3,9,10,12,100,200, and 300. These blocks, in general, are adjacent to, or within one block, of areas with parking surpluses. As an example, blocks 2 and 3 are within one to two blocks of the Park Plaza parking structure on block 11, which shows a surplus of 518 spaces. There are specific recommendations in Section 3 hat will assist or promote the use of parking areas that have available spaces such as 3.3.1-Park Plaza Improvement, 3.3.2-Marketing, 3.3.3-Signage, and 3.3.6-Paseos. RICH compared the parking demand developed using the method above to the occupancy counts conducted on December 14-15, 2006. Within the "primary study area" which considers just the blocks north of "G" Street, RICH analyzed 95 percent of the available on-street and off-street parking supply and found the occupancy to peak at about 58 percent. The calculated parking surplus from the demand projections for only the "primary study areo" is +393 spaces. The parking surplus from the turnover and occupancy study from the "primary area only" was approximately 900 spaces. Based on this comparison it appears that the demand model is not under-projecting parking demand using the 2.37 factor. In fact, this further supports the 2.0 ratio in the UCSP. 2.4.1 ENA Development At the time of RICH's review, there were four public parking lots identified as potential development opportunities. Each of these sites has an approved Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA), which is entered into by the Redevelopment Agency and developer to give structure to the negotiation process and identify a specify a period of time during which the Agency will negotiate exclusively with the developer. These sites are in Lots 3, 6, 9 and 10 and are shown on Map 9 (ENA Development SItes) in Section 3. RICH ran a parking demand and supply model for development of the ENA sites. This model is included as Exhibit 7 (Table 2H-Future Parking Demand of ENA Sites ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. No\;!! Parking Consultants. Planners 2-9 Final 8-44 UUI "E" ST. U II U~n ~ ,!, @ CV .:s ~uu o-'~ ~>cl~ ~G'~, i ~~~18 ~ ,j,e ~ CV $@ ~ . D CV PARKHA'f ST. D ST. C;rPRE5S ST. II T. VEL "H" ST. , ~ ~ t: I !!l ~ g - 9 P i~ ~))) ! )> i e ~ g ~ S .. ~ ~ ;j m!ij 6i ~, ~ I ~! i!H ~~! ! i! ~;~~ HE i! ~i!i - ~ i . H ii u: H Cl~ P ~Q} ~ ~ ~ O(S" E:Il~ >:I!2S sm~ ~g~ 0-< "TI Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study Developed). The model for the entire study area reflecting the development of the ENA sites shows that although there is still an existing surplus of parking spaces, that surplus is reduced from 1 ,293 spaces to 1,1 1 9 spaces. This was the result of the loss of existing surface parking spaces for the developments. The demand for the study area did not change since it was assumed that each development would self-park, meaning that it would provide the required parking spaces on site as part of the development. 2.4.2 proJectecI Parking Demand under the Urban Core SpecIfic Plan RICH projected parking demand with a projected build-out of Third Avenue based on the adopted UCSP. The projections assumed that each parcel along Third Avenue would be developed to maximum build out utilizing the 2.0 floor area ratio (FAR) as identified in the UCSP. The floor area was then divided allocated by land use; 40 percent residential, 40 percent commercial and 20 percent office space. This model determined the following: . Assuming maximum build out there would be total square footage of 1,445,205, compared to the estimated 950,680 square feet currently. . The project increase in square footage results in a reduction in the parking supply from 3,507 spaces to 3,012 spaces, reflecting the maximum build-out on each parcel and the loss of parking behind buildings The parking demand with the UCSP build-out was projected to be 3,425 spaces compared to the estimated 2,258 currently. This would result in a projected deficit of -506 spaces. This projected deficit is at maximum build-out, as previously described. The reality is that this density would likely never be achieved, therefore for planning purposes, this should be considered an upper-limit parking deficit. For a complete analysis of the projected build-out based upon the UCSP zoning standards, please refer to Exhibit 8 (Table 21-Parklng Demand Projections and Surplus and Deftclls for UCSP Mode~. 2.5 Operations and Enforcement The parking operations in Chula Vista are primarily overseen by the Finance Department. The Finance Department issues parking permits, oversees the Parking District revenue and administers parking and meter maintenance. The Police Department oversees parking enforcement. ==:~ ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. !\:1\;!! Parking Consultants - Pianners 2-10 Final 8-46 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study There are two Parking Enforcement Officers (PEO) for the entire City. Signs are posted indicating enforcement hours are from 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday. According to the Police Department, one PEO works Monday through Friday from 7:30 am to 4:30 pm. The other PEO works Tuesday through Saturday trom 9 am to 6 pm. Enforcement is primarily reactionary versus proactive because the first priority is to respond to citizen complaints, and there is just not enough manpower to cover the whole City. There are no set routes, but one PEO is responsible for territory south of H Street and the other is responsible for the area west of H Street (which is primarily downtown). In general however, we only observed the PEO's working in pairs. Table 2J below shows the number of overtime/expired meter tickets issued and the revenue generated for the last three years. This revenue is deposited into the Parking Meter Fund. The table covers through December 2006. The table shows a large fluctuation in the number of tickets written. This can be attributed to fluctuations in parking enforcement staffing and availability resulting in inconsistent enforcement. Generally, we would expect the number of tickets written to be consistent from year to year and possibly increasing slightly. Table 2J City of Chula VI&ta Parking TIcket StatIstIcs Year 2004 2005 2006 # Issued 5,071 1,988 3,687 Revenue $49,851 $42,185 $47,560 *Chula Vista Finance os of 02/07/2007 2.5.1 Parking Permits Permits are sold through the City Finance Department and cost $54.00 per quarter. Vehicles with permits can park in any of the City lots at ten-hour meters. Money collected from the sale of permits goes into the parking meter fund. The information provided below is a summary of the last three years and does not include approximately 60 permits issued per calendar year for employees of the Norman Park Senior Center. Table 2K City of Chula VIsta Parking Permit StatIstIcs Year 2004 2005 2006 # Issued 655 577 612 ADDroxlmate Revenue $35,370 $31,158 $33,048 *Infarmatian provided bv Chula Vista Finance Deoartment os of 09/1 0/07 ~~ ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. ~J;!! Parking Consultants - Planners 2-11 Final 8-47 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study 2.5.2 Regional Surveys RICH attempted to contact communities in the San Diego County area to determine what these communities charged for parking, what there fines were and how their parking was managed. We received very few responses. In general, only the City of San Diego and La Mesa charge for parking. The City of Coronado also charges for parking, though they were not part of the RICH survey. The City of San Diego has parking meter rates that range from $0.50 to $ 1 .25 per hour depending on location and duration of meters. Parking time limits range from four to nine hours. The City of La Mesa has parking meter rates that range from $0.50 to $0.75 per hour depending on location and duration of meters. Parking time limits range from two hour to four hours. Permit rates range from $40.00 to $60.00 per quarter depending on location. Table 2L (Parking VIolation Benchmarking) below shows a comparison of parking fine rates for the expired and overtime meters for selected communities; Encinitas, Escondido, La Mesa, Carlsbad, Vista and Temecula. These fine rates were then compared to the San Diego Counlywide Uniform Parking Fine Schedule (SDCUPFS). The SDCUPFS is a fine schedule that was established in 1 995 that many San Diego County municipalities have implemented. Overall, Chula Vista has the lowest fine rates for expired meter or overtime meter parking. Table 2L Parking Violation Benchmarking Chula Vista Carlsbad Encinitas Escondida Expired meter $12.00 nla nla $25.00 Overtime meter $12.00 nla nla nla -Information from SDPPEC Parking Violation Penalty Schedule June 2005 Vista nla nla La Mesa nla $25.00 San Diego $25.00 $35.00 San Diego County Wide Unformed Parking Fine Schedule $50.00 $50.00 2.5.3 Chula VIsta Parking Rates Parking rates in Chula Vista are low. When parking rates are low there is not an incentive to follow the requlations, such as staying beyond the posted time, whether one feeds the meter or not. Additionally, low meter rates generate less income to cover the increasing costs of meter maintenance, parking lot maintenance and the ability of the City to undertake parking capital projects. In general, the current parking rates are low in Chula Vista, compared to downtowns of similar size and composition. Concern regarding the low meter rates was expressed by stakeholders on several occasions. ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. B,!Q! Parking Consultants - Planners 2-12 Final 8-48 Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study Please refer to Table 2M (Chula V\sIa Meter Parking Rates) below for a summary of Chula Vista's current parking rates. Table 2M Chula Vista Meter Parldng Rates On-street 30 minute meters $0.05 per 10 minutes $0.10 per 20 minutes $0.25 per 30 minutes Token per 10 minutes On-street 2 and 3 hour meters $0.05 per 10 minutes $0.10 per 20 minutes $0.25 per 50 minutes Token per 10 minutes Off-street 4 hour meters $0.05 per 30 minutes $0.10 per 60 minutes $0.25 per 150 minutes Token per 30 minutes Off-street 10 hour meters $0.05 per 30 minutes $0.10 per 60 minutes $0.25 per 150 minutes Token per 30 minutes * The last parking rates increase may have occurred in 1996. Conclusion In this section RICH reviewed the processes and results of the fieldwork that was conducted to understand the existing parking dynamics in Chula Vista, determined potential parking impacts based upan the recently-adopted Urban Core Specific Plan, considered the impact of Exclusive Negotiating Agreements for several of the public parking lots. and described unique factors to Chula Vista and the parking district that were considered by RICH in their analysis. This information should be considered when reading the findings and recommendations presented in Section 3. as they provide the basis and context for understanding them. ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. !\:!,Q;! Parking Consultants - Planners 2-13 Final 8-49 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study Section Three - Findings and Recommendations The findings presented in this Section are based upon the fieldwork, research and review of Chula Vista's present parking dynamics culminating in recommendations intended to enhance the existing supply of parking through operational, management, configuration, parking pricing and allocation changes aimed at increasing the efficiency of the parking system. The recommendations provide a holistic approach to improving parking downtown today and plan for the future growth in the downtown. 3.1 Parking Management 3.1.0 Downtown Parking DIstrict Status and Boundaries Finding: The Downtown Parking District was formed in 1963 based upon a citizen-initiated request. The purpose of the District was to fund improvements and provide meters on the street to generate revenue and to help control parking. The obligation to maintain the meters and continue to funnel revenue back into the District ended in 1999, although the City has continued to utilize funds for parking- related activities. Our research has determined that the revenue from the DPD has gone to maintain parking areas, enforcement and other improvements. While the obligation has been fulfilled, RICH recommends that parking meters remain on- street and in the lots (along with multi-space meters). Maintaining the meters helps to control employee or long stay parking at short stay spaces and it generates revenue for the district to help fund enforcement, maintenance and other parking- related operations. Recommendation: Maintain the District and modify the boundaries. The north boundary of E Street would remain unchanged. The east boundary should be extended to Del Mar and the west boundary extended to Garrett. The south boundary should be extended to H Street. Since Del Mar and Garrett do not run south through to H Street, the east boundary south of G Street should be the alley east of Third Avenue and the west boundary should run straight through blocks to H Street. Map 8 (Downtown Parldng DIstrIct Recommendation) on the next page shows the proposed new boundary. This expanded area will cover areas that may be impacted by changes to the parking policy as well as including the Gateway project to the south. Cost: Zero Revenue: Additional revenue may be generated if the District boundaries are modified. ActIon Time: Fourth Quarter of 2008 ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. = ~ Parking Consultants - Planners R.I.f.1! 3-1 Final 8-50 'p ~~ ~ i ~ e Q<S~ ~ ~ ~ ! e i~ ~))) c::o::O ~ ~ ~-I2S ~ .. ~ :cZ ;::-10 <me ~ Q} m :E 1 ~! ~~n lii ~Q~ ~ i z z R o "'II i 'l''', j-- i~f ~~;~ & ~ () )>::;!o , ^ ~ )> i! !~n Ii. ~ " 0-< o jl! g H "1l Z - ., ' ~ ~ z l> Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study 3.1.1 Parking Staff Finding: The management of the parking system is not effective. There is no head or director of parking and there are several City departments that have direct or indirect involvement in parking such as Finance, Police Department, Planning and Community Development. There is not one primary point of contact for stakeholders. Having the parking function handled by several City departments works well for small communities with limited parking. However, Chula Vista's parking system is becoming larger and more cumbersome to manage using the interdepartmental approach. Additionally, there are decisions made concerning parking operations, and budgets that are based on normal best practices. The role of the Finance Department in parking needs to be limited and decisions on the operations and budgets needs to come from someone who has as part of there job description parking operations and are then able to devote more time to parking issues. The lack of management and a designated coordinator has resulted in a lack of cohesive planning for parking and policies that have not addressed the gamut of parking issues within the District. It was also noted that there are several stakeholder groups that have an interest in the parking both within the District and the City in general. These groups are TAVA, Chamber of Commerce and the PBID. Recommendatlon: Implement a two-phase approach for the management of parking in Chula Vista. Phase One should include the following: 1. Form a Parking Advisory Committee (PAC) consisting of members of the business community, TAVA, Chamber of Commerce and City staff. The PAC will advise city council on the implementation of the parking plan, review proposals for parking improvements and requests for changes to the systems such as time duration limits, allocation of parking etc. As an option, include one city council and one redevelopment member to the PAC. Though the majority of the parking issues are within the Downtown Parking District, the PAC should cover all issues concerning parking in Chula Vista. 2. Appoint someone from the City's Community Development department as Parking Director. As Parking Director, this person will be responsible for coordinating the various departments that deal with parking such as Finance, Police, and Public Works. This person would also be the coordinator of the PAC. Though this covers parking outside the Downtown Parking District, the majority of the issues concern the District. 3. Establish a separate parking enterprise fund that would take in the revenue from parking operations. There would be a separate budget prepared for parking ~. Rich and Associates. Inc. -= ~ Parking Consultants - Planners !1~!! 3-2 Final 8-52 Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study including normal operating expenses, capital expenses, and projections of revenues from parking meters, multi space meters, permits and fines. This would include all of the parking in Chula Vista. 4. Incorporate TAVA into the marketing program. Phase Two should consider and may include: 1. Transfer the management of the parking system from city staff to an outside management firm or another organization such as TAVA. 2. Continue the Parking Advisory Committee. A person from Community Development should remain involved and be responsible for directing the PAC. Cost: Will involve city staff time that should be assigned to the parking operations. Revenue: None Action TIme: Fourth Quarter of 2007- Appoint Interim Parking Director First Quarter of 2008- Establish Parking Committee i 3.1.2 Parking Enterprise Fund Finding: The District has no obligation to continue to use funds generated by parking meter revenue and fines on parking-related activities (i.e. maintenance, repairs and capital improvements). Recommendation: Treat the parking revenue as an Enterprise Fund and place all revenue generated from the Downtown Parking District into this fund and direct that these monies will only be utilized for parking expenses and improvements within the District. The City should put all net revenue from parking less what the general fund will receive in 2007 into a parking fund. The General Fund would be capped at the 2007 level and all additional net revenues would go into the parking fund. This fund would be used for capital improvements to parking. Cost: Zero Revenue: None ActIon TIme: Fourth Quarter of 2007 3.1.3 Parking Education Finding: As with many communities, there is a general lack of awareness of parking facts within the Chula Vista community. This is evidenced by the amount of 3-3 Final ::::;~ Rich and Associates, Inc. =:;::: Parking Consultants - Planners !'J.f!! 8-53 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study overtime parking at short-term meters by employees. In general, there needs to be an education campaign that continually stresses the costs of parking, what the regulations are for enforcement, transit options and the vision of a walk able community. Without a continual education campaign, many of the recommendations in this report will be difficult to successfully implement. Recommendation: Incorporate the education program into the marketing recommendations. This involves including information in mailers and print ads to business ownerS/managers and employees and conducting presentations to local organizations. Cast: Zero Revenue: None Action TIme: Fourth Quarter of 2007 3.2 Parking Policies 3.2.0 City Parking Policies Finding: Other than the in-lieu fee policy, the City has no parking policies. Recommendation: Parking Policies need to be developed and updated as the downtown evolves. Policies should be established for overtime parking, enforcement strategies, parking allocation and charges for parking. The overtime parking should address "shuffling from one short term space to another. Parking enforcement strategies could include how routes are established, time periods that meters are enforced and how rigorous enforcement will be. Parking allocation policies could include the number of permits sold, whether permits should be sold for specific lots, the time limits for short term parking in various lots etc. Finally, policies on parking charges could reflect variable parking rates based on location (concentric parking charges that reflect lower rates for parking that is farther away etc) and based on length of stay. Cast: Zero Revenue: None ActIon TIme: Third Quarter of 2008 3.2.1 In-Lieu Fee Finding: The in-lieu fee policy has been in place since 1980. The formula to calculate the fee is based upon a percentage of construction costs, which is not standard. The formula is confusing to use. RICH requested historical data from the City with respect to monies that were taken in by the fund for the in-lieu fee and 3-4 Final ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. =:3~ Parking Consultants - Planners !h~!! 8-54 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study expenditures from the fund and determined that the fees received were spent appropriately for the development and maintenance of parking. There were numerous concerns expressed by stakeholders about how the funds had been spent and what the total for fees that were collected. Recommendallon: The in lieu fee system should be retained. The cost per space should be indexed to the cost of the construction of one parking space in a parking structure as opposed to the present model. A per space fee of 25 to 50 percent of the cost of a structured space at the low end of today's cost ($15,000 per space on the low end) would range from $3,750 to $7,500 per space. At the end of each year a report should be prepared on the money received in the in lieu fund, an accounting on how the money was spent that year and the balance in the fund at the year end. It needs to be stressed that the in lieu fee is not an entitlement to a space, nor does it eliminate the need for the business to pay the normal parking charges. This message needs to be consistently given. Cost: Minimal cost, some staff time Revenue: Additional revenue based on development Acflon Time: Third Quarter of 2008- Review and revise policy Annually- Review of policy, preparafion of accounting, and dissemination of information to the public to occur annually Table 3A (In Ueu Parking Fee Reconciliation). on the next page, shows the payments made into the fund and interest income and expenditures paid from the fund. Based on data provided by the City's search, RICH determined that there was a total of $509,742.80 paid into the fund and $493,125.04 was paid from the fund. The expenditures from the fund were made for land acquisitions and construction of surface lots on those properties. Based on this, RICH believes that the funds fhat were paid into the account were expended for parking acquisition and improvements that benefited the District directly. Based upon the information provided, there were no inappropriate expenditures. There does need to be an annual reporting of the in-lieu fee to stakeholders. 3-5 Final ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. _ ~ Parking Consultants - Planners ~,f1! 8-55 Chula Vista Downtown Parking study Table 3A In LIeu Parking Fee Reconciliation Revenue From In LIeu Fee Payments $7.025.00 $ 1 9.250.00 $83.125.00 $21.875.00 $65.800.00 $0.00 $19.775.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $26.250.00 $ 150.500.00 $28.379.16 $3.500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $425,479.16 FY 1 983 FY 1984 FY 1985 FY 1986 FY 1987 FY 1988 FY 1989 FY 1 990 FY 1991 FY 1 992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1 996 FY 1997 FY 1 998 FY 1 999 Total Revenues Expenditures From In LIeu Fund FY 1984 $875.00 FY 1990 $126.500.00 $1.660.00 $103.326.91 $127.012.70 $24.76 $600.67 $ 134.000.00 FY 1991 FY 1 992 FY 1994 FY 1 996 FY 1997 Total Expenditures Interest Income $0.00 $0.00 $6.072.94 $6.978.93 $7.895.12 $11 .737.94 $12,463.34 $17.345.11 $5.397.69 $1.939.00 $0.00 $2.200.50 $6.470.53 $4.319.18 $461.43 $457.73 $524.20 $84.263.64 Total $7.025.00 $19.250.00 $89.197.94 $28.853.93 $73.695.12 $11 ,737.94 $32.238.34 $17,345.11 $5.397.69 $1.939.00 $26.250.00 $ 152,700.50 $34.849.69 $7.819.18 $461.43 $457.73 $524.20 $509,742.80 Refund of fees Centre Parking Landis Parking Landis Parking Church and Center Municipal Parking Church and Center Reimbursed to Other Agencies Dlflerences of Revenues over Expenses $493,125.04 $16,617.76 ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. =~ Parking Consultants - Planners !1~~ 8-56 3-6 Final Chula VIsta Downtown Parking study 3.2.2 Valet Parking Finding: Valet parking is currently not used in Chula Vista. Recommendation: The City should have a policy in place for regulating how valet operations would be run and where vehicles are parked. This policy should include using public parking areas and private off-street lots as valet parking storage and on- street spaces for vehicle drop off and pick up. The policy should specity rental charges for on-street parking stalls used for pick-up and drop-off by valet operators so that the operator can rent as many or as few stalls as they need for their operation. Overall, the policy should specify valet operation standards, the use of and design of permissible signs, on-street parking stall rental charges and the necessary parking area lease agreements with private parking owners or with the City to provide the valet with evening parking privileges. Further to that the policy, the agreement should specify penalties and or the revoking of the valet operator's license for violation of the policy regulations. Cost: Minimal Revenue: None projected AcIIan TIme: Third Quarter of 2008- Enact ordinance allowing and regulating valet services 3.2.3 Residential Parking Permit Finding: There is currently no residential parking permit policy. With the proposed increases to parking rates and the increase in enforcement of parking, there is the potential that parkers, especially employees may decide to park further away for free on-street parking. This could cause increased parking in the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Should this occur, a residential parking permit program may be required. Recommendation: The City should prepare a residential parking program policy and possibly an ordinance if the need arises. The policy would generally state that when residents notify the City of a parking problem, the City will canvass the neighbors on one side or both sides of the affected blocks or blocks and if a significant majority agree to the program, the City would erect signs, give (or sell) permits to residents and allow for limited guest parking based on additional input from the residents. Generally, two hour parking is allowed within certain times and for visitors who will stay longer, placards can be given (sold) to residents for their guest parking. Cost: Minimal for supplies and staff time 3::l. Rich and Associates. Inc. -=::;:: Parking Consultants - Planners ~.f.!! 3-7 Final 8-57 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking study Revenue: No net revenue projected ActIon Time: Third Quarter of 2008- Prepare policy and/or ordinance establishing procedure for residential parking permits services 3.2.4 Reporting to Communl1y Finding: There is no established process for information sharing between the City and stakeholders. This has led to mistrust and confusion about parking policies and enforcement. Recommendation: An annual report should be prepared for the community on the status of the parking operation. The report should cover and accounting of income and expenses. details on enforcement including number of tickets written and fines collected. accounting of meter and permit revenue and any management and policy issues. Cost: Minimal cost. some staff time Revenue: None ActIon Time: Annually-Report prepared and presented 3.3 Parking Operations 3.3.0 Parking Revenues and Expenses Finding: Parking revenues in general have been erratic. reaching a peak in 2004 but then dropping to only $298.066.00 for 2006. Parking permit revenue rose from 2002 through 2005 but then dropped by about 23 percent. Meter revenue also rose every year from 2002 until 2005. In 2006 though there was a 1 7 percent drop in meter revenue. Parking citations were about $83,000 in 2002 but dropped every year thereafter and reached a low of about $47.000 in 2005. This is a about a 56 percent decrease. Parking citation revenues did rise in 2006 though by about 22 percent. Expenses have also been up and down. Expenses peaked in 2003 at $354.920 and hit the lowest point in the most recent operating year (2006) with $231 .540 in expenses. In general there was no explanation for the variances in the trends in either revenues or expenses. As of June 30, 2007, the unaudited parking fund balance was $137.430. but only $31 .401 was considered available funds due to the remainder being designated as funds for contingency. The fund balance represents the accumulated annual excess of all sources of parking revenue including meter revenue, permits and fine revenue less all parking related expenses. ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. = -.:: Parking Consuitants - Planners ~~!! 3-8 Final 8-58 Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study RICH received parking revenue and expense data from the City for the DPD for the last five years. Table 3B (Historical Parking DlsIrIct Parking Revenue and Fees) is the compilation of this data. Table 3B Historical Parking Dlslrlct Parking Revenue and Fees FY2oo5- FY 2004- FY 2003- FY20Q2- FY 2001- 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Revenue Permits $27,402.00 $35.996.00 $33,015.00 $27,681.00 $26,154.00 Parking Citations $53,728.00 $46,939.00 $65,830.00 $69,067.00 $83,211.00 On-Street Parking Meters $147,467.00 $176.527.00 $171.915.00 $158,150.00 $153,896.00 Off Street Parkina Meters $69,469.00 $88.314.00 $81.559.00 $75.616.00 $74,434.00 Total Revenue $298,066.00 $347.776.00 $352,319.00 $330.514.00 $337,695.00 Expendnures Personnel Services $22.077.00 $39.351.00 $38.941.00 $87,487.00 $88,850.00 Supplies and Services $24,421.00 $38,450.00 $46.954.00 $54,484.00 $30,299.00 City Staff Services $185.042.00 $232,126.00 $215,904.00 $212,949.00 $194.512.00 Total Revenue $231 ,540.00 $309,927.00 $301,799.00 $354,920.00 $313.661.00 Recommendation: Prepare a Parking District Operating Budget that projects appropriate operating and expenses for the District. An annual report should be prepared for the community on the status of the parking operation. The report would cover the income and expenses. details on tickets written and collected, money collected from meters and permits and then management and policy issues. In addition. the City should track costs on a line item basis in order to establish trends for budgeting. Cost: Minimal for supplies and staff time. Revenue: None Action TIme: Annually- Operating Budget and Report prepared 3.3.1 Marketing Finding: The City does not have a marketing program for the Parking District. TAVA has provided limited marketing of the parking district. Recommendation: RICH recommends that an on-going and budgeted parking marketing program be developed. The program should be funded by the parking system and could be implemented by the Third Avenue Village Association under the direction of the Parking Advisory Committee. ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. -=:;;:: Parking Consultants - Planners !,:}~l,! 3-9 Final 8-59 Chuta VIsta Downtown Parking Study The marketing plan should include direct mailings, brochures, maps, and on-line web page as part of the City's web site or articles in magazines. Parking information should be included in each TAVA newsletter. This would repeat information on employee parking and reinforce that on-street and short stay spaces in off-street lots are for customer/Visitor use. Also, the marketing effort would include bringing business on board for the parking validation system and then marketing the availability of this system to the public. Information contained in the marketing material should include location, up-coming changes, pricing, regulations, fine payment options and any other information relating to the parking system. Cost: Budget $' 5,000 per year for on-going marketing efforts. Revenue: No revenue can be projected though the marketing campaign should increase revenue. ActIon TIme: Third Quarter of 200B 3.3.2 Slgnage Finding: The City is lacking overall in a comprehensive and coordinated sign program. There are parking way finding signs in Chula Vista though they are not all the same shape, color or text. The signs do not lead all the way to the parking areas. The lots do not have Location/Identification signs, telling where a parker he/she is in downtown and what types of parking are permitted. Recommenc:latlon: RICH recommends that a comprehensive sign program be developed, including the four types of parking signage: direction, location, identification, and pedestrian way finding. Examples of these are shown on the following pages. Way finding should be addressed for both vehicles and pedestrians. There are four fundamental signs for way finding beginning with introduction signs that designate a symbol and color to look for when seeking a parking area. The next level of signs assists peaple to find the downtown area. Location and directional signs direct people once downtown to specific areas or districts. Identification and location signs are used at the entrance to specific parking areas to indicate the name of the parking area. All parking areas should have a unique designation, such as a name and color to help visitors and customers to orient themselves and remember where they parked. Identification and location signs are commonly combined to create one sign thus reducing the number of signs. Parking area identification should also include a concise description of who can park there, how much it will cost and how long they can park. 3-10 Final ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. 4 Parking Consultants - Planners ~.f,!! 8-60 Chula Vista Downtown Parking S1udy Cost: 10,000 to $50,000 depending on signs, how many, and design. Revenue: Additional revenue may be collected, but cannot be projected at this time. ActIon TIme: Third Quarter of 2008 Examples of Parking Signs by Type ldenflftcatlon This identification sign has 4" text lettering. The parking symbol or identification logo is approximate Iy 26 inches in height. ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. =--:: Parking Consultants - Planners !1I's!!: 8-61 3-11 Final Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study This is an example of combining a vehicular and pedestrian way finding sign. The use of a map for the pedestrian way finding is very beneficial. 3-12 Final ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. =:;:: Parking Consultants - Planners fi.~l.! 8-62 Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study 1he general qualllles of good s1gnage Include the following aspects: . Use of common logos and colors. . Placement at or near eye level. . Use of reflective, durable material. . All four types used in conjunction to guide motorist and pedestrian activity. . All entrances to the downtown need to have introduction signage. . All parking areas need to have identification signage. . All routes through the downtown need to have directional and location signage. . All pedestrian routes to and from major customer/visitor parking areas need to have way finding signs. . The identification signs located at parking areas need to convey parking rates, hours of operation, maximum durafions, and validation availability. DesIgn Specific Crtterla Recommendations: . In general, sign lettering should be four inches in height. Smaller lettering may be difficult to see and cause traffic slow-downs as drivers read signs before entering a parking area. . Depending on the location for the signs, some may need State Department of Transportation approval before installation. The City Engineering Department will need to be consulted on specific locations that fall under State control and the various regulations that may need to be met. . Logos and sign colors can be customized to suit the communities desired design criteria. The important element is to be sure that signs can be read easily by being a distinctive color that stands out from background colors of adjacent buildings. . The signs colors and logos need to be consistent for ease of understanding and quick visual reference by drivers. . Sign programs are usually best undertaken at a City-wide level to include all the City's signs. The comprehensive nature of a large- scale sign program helps ensure that all forms of way-finding signs (vehicular and pedestrian) are taken into account. . Vehicular way-finding needs to be laid out initially in a coordinated fashion to determine what the preferred entry points to the community should be. Often directed traffic flow is a more efficient option that allows the community to take advantage of planned vehicle routes and entry points. A key 'rule of thumb' is that fewer, well thought out and well placed signs are far better than too many signs scattered randomly throughout a community. . Vehicular way-finding should include direction arrows to key destination places such as theaters, museums, shopping districts, etc., used in conjunction with the parking direction signs to allow a driver to quickly orient them selves to 3-13 Final ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. =;::: Parking Consultants - Planners ~!f.B 8-63 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study their destination and best parking options. Arrows should always be oriented to indicate forward. left or right movement. Reverse arrows or arrows indicating that a destination has been passed should be avoided to reduce confusion. 3.3.3 Condition of CI1y Parking Lots FInding: In general the parking lots need attention. There are several parking areas that have broken or missing lights. and some that need additional lighting. Parking stall striping, and signage in general needs to be redone. In all cases the meters are in bad condition and the meter poles need painting. RICH reviewed each parking area and the findings from that review are included in Table 3C (Parking Lot Condition Assessn .ent) on page 3-15. Recommenc:lallon: Make the following improvements and upgrades. . L1ghnng: Lighting needs upgrading in lots 2.3.4, and 1'. In some cases there is insufficient lighting and in lot 3 for example there are missing lights. . StrIplnglPalnnng: Lots' . 2, 5, 6. 9. and' 0 need re-striping. In general, the lots should be re-striped every year or every other year as needed. . Slgnage: Recommendations for signs are covered in more detail in 3.3.2, but overall, there need to be identification signs identifying public parking areas and the type of parking available and way finding signs to assist the parker in finding their destination. . Lot Surfaces: Lot 5 needs to be resurfaced and any depressions filled and compacted. Lot 2 had several depressions that need to be filled and that part of the lot surfaced. . Lanclscaplng: Landscaping needs to be maintained such that shrubs and small trees are pruned so that someone cannot hide behind them and possible attack a pedestrian. Cost: No estimates were made at this time. Additional analysis must be completed to quantify and qualify the improvements that are required. Revenues: None ActIon TIme: Third Quarter of 2008-Analysis of facilities Fourth Quarter of 2008- Prepare specifications and bid First and Second Quarter of 2009-lmplement ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. _~ Parking Consultants - Planners !\~!! 3-14 Final 8-64 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study Table 3C Parking Lot Condition Assessment LoI# Lights strIplna Slanaae Surface Landscaping Metell 1 No lighting needs 10 signage need Surface ok, ok Paint poles or painting improvements had wheel stops add signs surface has some Only one pole, needs 10 signage need depressions that Paint poles or 2 may not be painting improvements could be ok add signs enough hazardous, . overlay surface Some missing lights with "Old 10 signage need surface ok, Paint poles or 3 Style" poles, ok Improvements curbing ok ok add signs appears to be adequate Needs exterior Concrete rehab 4 Lighting needs ok and interior necessary , ok N/A upgrade signage especially on root . deck Surface in bad 5 One light pole is needs 10 signage need condition, needs ok Paint poles or sufficient painting improvements tilling and overlay, add signs curbs ok 6 No lighting needs 10 signage need Surface ok, ok N/A painting improvements curbing ok Has "Old Style " 7 lighting, appears ok 10 signage need surface ok, ok Paint poles or ok improvements curbing ok add signs Has "Old Style " 8 lighting, ok 10 signage need surface ok, Very well Paint poles or appears improvements curbing ok landscaped add signs ok 9 One light pole needs 10 signage need surface ok, ok Paint poles or appears sufficient painting improvements curbing ok add signs 10 One light pole needs 10 signage need surface ok, ok Paint poles or appears sufficient painting improvements curbing ok add signs Has "Old Style " lighting, may not 10 signage need surface ok, Paint poles or 11 be sufficient ok ok lighting due to improvements curbing ok add signs location at poles 3-15 Final ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. = ~ Parking Consultants - Planners !11~};! 8-65 Chula Vista Downtown Parking S1udy 3.3.4 ExIsting Parking Area Configuration Finding: RICH reviewed the design and layout of each of the City's parking lots. In general, all of the parking areas are laid out as efficiently as possible. The exception is Lot 6, which due to the entry/exit configuration causes parkers to enter the lot from Madrona and the alley going the wrong way down the alley. Recommenc:lallon: There are no recommendations at this time. If Lot 6 is not redeveloped. then the entry/exit issue should be addressed. Possible options include removing the one-way designation in the alley thereby increasing access through the alley or create an entry/exit off of Madrona, although this would potentially reduce the capacity of the lot. Cost: Zero Revenue: None AcIIon TIme: Second Quarter of 200B-Analyze Lot 6 3.3.5 Paseos Finding: Some of the paseos need improvement as they are not inviting for pedestrian use because. Many are not well-lit and lack way finding and identification signage. Additional improvements such as landscaping and painting would help create a more pedestrian-friendly atmosphere. These paseos are an integral part of the parking system, especially when downtown blocks are long. They help cut down on the distance customers and visitors have to walk to and from parking, thus making the parking lots more viable and attractive. The paseos are a severely underutilized asset for the District that need to be improved and then marketed to the public. Recommendation: Install signage to better identify the paseos (refer to signage recommendation). It is important for a customer/Visitor to quickly identify their destination once they have parked their vehicle. Signage leading from the parking area to the downtown will create a positive experience for employees and customers, especially new visitors in the downtown. Consider using murals and landscaping in the paseos to create more inviting walking experience from the parking lots to the businesses on Third Street. These walkthroughs must be well lit and inviting for people to use them. There are some paseos in the downtown that have shops lining the walkway. This makes the walking experience inviting and interesting. Cost: Budget $10,000- $100,000 depending on landscaping. The costs for changes to the paseos could be paid for by TAVA and the Pbid. 3-16 Final :::;~ Rich and Associates. Inc. -= ~ Parking Consultants - Planners ltJ.fll 8-66 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking study Revenue: Additional revenue may be collected. but cannot be projected at this time. ActIon TIme: Fourth Quarter of 2008 The picture on the right is an inviting well-lit paseo in downtown Chula Vista. The paseo on the right is also downtown but needs lighting and art to create a more inviting space. A good example of an inviting paseo with good lighting, landscaping and a mural. ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. -=::: Parking Consultants - Planners ~~!! 3-17 Final 8-67 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study 3.3.6 Validation System Finding: There is currently no validation system in place. Recommendation: As a part of the overall marketing plan. RICH recommends that the City institute a parking validation system. This can take several forms with the goal of giving businesses ways to offer free parking to their visitors or customers. With the recommended electronic parking meters and multi space meters, we have recommended a value card option. The value card allows parkers to prepay for parking by allotting a certain dollar amount on the card. In the scenario of the validation system, a business could purchase cards from the City that they could then in turn give to their customers or visitors for future use. In addition. the card is rechargeable and can be recharged at any of the multi-space meters and City Hall. Cost: Upfront costs of validations may run from $3,000 to $5.000 Revenue: No revenue increase can be projected though the validation should help increase revenue ActIon Time: First Quarter of 2009 Finding: The Parking Enforcement Program in downtown Chula Vista is not functioning at optimal efficiency. The Parking Enforcement Officers (PEO) do not just enforce parking within the District. They enforce other parking regulations outside the District as well. The posted times of enforcement are Monday through Saturday from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.. but the officers are not scheduled to enforce parking in the District during this entire time. There do not appear to be set routes or beats for the PEOs to follow every two hours, thus creating an inconsistent and sometimes haphazard enforcement of parking. RICH staff observed PEO's working in pairs. During the last few years. the Finance Department has reported that only .75 of a PEO has been dedicated, and paid from, the District. 3.4 Parking Enforcement 3.4.0 Parking Enforcement Staffing Recommendation: Enforcement optimizes the efficiency of existing parking and has the potential to increase fine revenue. For enforcement to operate at optimal efficiency there needs to be personnel dedicated to parking enforcement. II is a key component of enforcement that the officers cover a route and consistently check vehicles. In all cases PEOs should use a hand held ticket writer to conduct license plate checks and monitor when vehicles are staying beyond the allotted time or shuffling their vehicle to avoid receiving a parking citation. 3-18 Final :~ Rich and Assaciates. Inc. =:;:: Parking Consultants. Planners !1I~tl 8-68 Chula Vista Downtown Parldng study Cost: Budget $70.000 for an additional full-time position including salary and benefits. This estimate is based upon the estimated current cost to fund a full-time PEO at the City of Chula Vista. Revenue: Based on current fine rates and collection rates. the fines are projected to be $63.700. With the proposed increased fine rates the projected revenue is estimated at $75.100 for the first year and $88.000 for the second year, based upon a projected increase of 15 to 20 percent in the number of tickets issued. ActIon Time: First Quarter of 2009 3.4.1 Handheld TIcket Writers Finding: The Chula Vista Police Department uses handheld ticket writers to issue parking tickets. Currently these devices are not being used to their full potential. This results in less than optimal enforcement since information is not readily available to the parking enforcement officers. Handheld ticket writers can be used to enforce activities such as shuffling from space to spoce, meter feeding and people not poying tickets. These ticket writers can also record the number of tickets a vehicle has received as well as any outstanding tickets. They can also be updated with information such as stolen vehicles and warrant information. Properly used, handheld ticket writers increase the efficiency of the overall parking system. To most effectively utilize the ticket writers, an enforcement route needs to be established and followed every two hours during Chula Vista's enforcement period of Monday through Saturday from 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. The handheld ticket writers should be utilized to record the license plate of each vehicle parked in short term parking and input into the handheld. The enforcement officer. can then use the handheld to determine if a vehicle has moved or if the parking meter is being fed beyond the two-hour time limit. Recommendation: Upgrade the system used in the handheld ticket writers to allow them to record and track license plates, provide information about outstanding tickets and number of tickets received, and data regarding stolen vehicle and warrant information. Cost: Esnmatec:l at $40.000. although the costs need to be determined bosed on a written specification of the requirements that the supplier can review and respond to with a cost. Revenue: The specific revenue increases that could be anticipated from upgrading the software to accomplish the different goals are projected to result in at least a 1 0% increase in the number of tickets written. Based on current fine rates and collection levels, this would increase the fine revenue to $52,300. With the higher 3-19 Final ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. -= ~ Parking Consultants - Planners N~ti 8-69 Chula Vista Downtown Parking study fine rates proposed in #3 below the projected fine revenue could be $69,900 the first year and $81,100 the second year. ActIon TIme: First Quarter of 2008- Prepare specifications and Issue Request for Proposals Second Quarter of 2008- Enter into contract with vendor and have software changes completed 3.4.2 OVertime Parking Fine Finding: Chula Vista's overtime parking fine of $12.00 is not currently high enough to discourage parkers from knowingly violating parking regulations. During the turnover and occupancy study RICH observed many vehicles staying beyond the posted times both on-street and off-street. If violators knew that regular enforcement occurred in the District and received tickets for infractions, an increased fine would aid in decreasing the number of violators. 8ecause enforcement is inconsistent, many parkers are willing to violate the parking regulations because they know that even if they receive a ticket the fine amount is still significantly lower than buying a parking permit or consistently feeding the meter. Encouraging patrons to use parking as designated by the parking regulations and pay for their parking increases the efficiency of the system, thus effectively providing more parking opportunities in the downtown area. Fine income will increase and aid in updates to the parking system. Recommendation: Increase the overtime parking fine from $12.00 per infraction to $50.00, consistent with the Parking Violation Penalty Schedule, as prepared by the San Diego Parking Penalties Executive Committee in June 2005. Most cities within the County have adopted this tee structure. Additionally, the fine should increase from $24.00 to $75.00 if the ticket remains unpaid within the thirty- day repayment period. Cost: None Revenue: Assuming the percentage of tickets paid remains the same, there are no more additional tickets written per year (use 2006 as base), the estimated first year revenue is projected to be $62,650 and second year at $73,300. Assuming handheld updated software for the ticket writers in #1 above the fine revenue is projected to be $69,900 the first year and $81.100 the second year. ActIon TIme: Implement First Quarter of 2008 3-20 Final a: Rich and Associates. Inc. =~ Parking Consultants - Planners !':1'sI! 8-70 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking study 3.4.3 Multiple TIckets Finding: Currently Chula Vista .issues multiple tickets for the same day violations of expired meters. This policy is consistent with the policies of many other communities surveyed by RICH. Similar to graduated fines, multiple tickets for the same infraction also aids in discouraging individuals from knowingly violating parking regulations as an alternative to paying for parking. The use of handheld computer technology compliments this effort as the software tracks license plate information and the infraction particulars. The ticket writer can then identify were multiple infractions occur and issue tickets accordingly. Recommenc:latlon: This policy should be continued because it encourages individuals to adhere to parking regulations. For example, a parker will not park all day at a two-hour meter since he/she will receive multiple tickets, resulting in fines. This ensures appropriate turnover rates and provides more parking to customers and visitors Cost: None Revenue: No projected increase ActIon TIme: Currently in place 3.4.4 Courtesy TIcket Finding: There is currently no courtesy ticket issued for first time violators. Recommenc:latlon: RICH recommends that from a public relations standpoint Chula Vista should issue courtesy tickets for the first offense of a non permit vehicle. With the recommended enhancements to enforcements, customers and visitors who mistakenly stay beyond the meters time length may be ticketed resulting in a negative image for the downtown. The parker need to be informed of parking regulations as well as parking areas that have longer stay meters or in the case of Park Plaza, free parking. This would require utilizing the handheld units currently used for enforcement and the storage of data for a longer period of time. If a vehicle (without a permit) at an expired meter has not received a ticket during a specific period of time (say the last six months), then a courtesy ticket could be issued that would first thank the parker for coming to downtown Chula Vista and that their patronage is appreciated. Then the courtesy ticket would go on to alert the parker to the fact that they were in violation and then give the parker a map with alternatives to where they can park for longer periods of time. Cost: Loss of revenue from first ticket issued to an individual. Will require software upgrades to handheld ticket writers that are included in #1 above. 3-21 Final ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. -=:::: Parking Consultants - Planners jy:.\=J! 8-71 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study Revenue: The projected loss of revenue is difficult to project at this time. ActIon TIme: First Quarter of 2008 3.5 Parking and Revenue Control 3.5.0 On-S1reet Parking Finding: The meters need to be replaced. There are three types of meters being used in Chula Vista, with the majority of the meters more than 30 years old. There appear to be many non-functioning meters, as noted during RICH's fieldwork, which is likely due to the inability of the City to repair meters due to their age, which has resulted in a lack of ability to purchase parts and equipment for the meters. This causes numerous problems particularly since the public does not receive consistent or clear direction as to what the regulations are related to broken meters. It appears that tickets are issued to vehicles parked at broken meters even when a note was attached to the meter stating that it was broken. This creates a sense of confusion and frustration from customers and visitors. Duncan Meter Three different types of meters are used in downtown Chula Vista Recommendation: The City needs to purchase new meters for the on-street parking in the District. RICH recommends that the City purchase individual electronic meters for on-street parking. The meters can accept coins, tokens and value or smart cards, which could be sold to merchants. The value cards could be used by merchants as a marketing tool by distributing a card to customers for free parking on their next visit. The meters should be electronic, which will allow rates and time parameters to be more easily changed. Additionally, the reporting of income and use by each meter can be downloaded by a handheld machine which will assist in the revenue analysis and accountability. Ideally, the system would also be wireless. Several options were considered such as individual meters, multi-space meters and pay-and-display machines. . The multi-space meter requires each on-street stall to be numbered with the parker locating and walking to the meter's central location, generally in the middle of the block, entering their stall number and then depositing the ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. ~ Parking Consultants - Planners !1~!! 8-72 3-22 Final Chula VIsta Downtown Parking S1udy appropriate amount of money required for the duration of their stay. The multi-space machine can include credit cards or value cards and can be networked. The downside of the multi-space meter is that it requires the parker to find the central pay location on the block. Enforcement is also a bit more difficult. With the multi-space meter the enforcement person must check the machine to see which spaces still have valid time. The PEa could not drive by each space to see if there was an expired meter. . The pay and display machine is also centralized on the block and the parker deposits the amount of money for the amount of time they want to park and then they receive a receipt that they then place in the front dashboard ot their vehicle. The pay and display machine can include credit cards or value cards and can be networked. . The downside of the pay and display machine is that it requires the parker to find the central pay location on the block. Enforcement is also a bit more difficult. With the pay-and-display machine the PEa will have to look in each dash to see if the vehicle has overstayed the time printed on the receipt. The PEa could not drive by each space to see if there was an expired meter. Cost: $160,000 for individual meters. Additional cost for specifications and drawings is estimated at $10,000. Revenue: No additional revenue was projected by having new meters though some increase may be expected. ActIon TIme: First Quarter of 2008- Prepare specifications and bid Second Quarter of 2008-lnstall 3.5.1 Off-Street Parking Finding: In the off-street lots there were several instances where there is random placement of two-hour meter heads in a row of 1 O-hour meters. RICH staff is not sure why this was occurring, though there were several lots where this occurred. Single space meter heads can be difficult to maintain, for both collection and maintenance. They can also take significant time to empty and enforce. There are several options such as the multi-space and pay and display meters that would help make parking enforcement, collection and maintenance more efficient. The four-hour off-street parking is being used for long term parking by employees however most employees are at work eight plus hours a day. This would require an employee to feed the meter. It could be argued that visitors who require more than two hours of parking are using this parking, but the turnover study did not find this to be the case. There is no issue keeping the four-hour meters, though it requires employees to feed the meter if they park there and work more than four hours a day. ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. ~ Parking Consultants - Planners ~!f!! 3-23 Final 8-73 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking S1udy Recommendallon: Install multi-space meters in off street lots #2, #3, #5 and #7. The remainder of the lots would receive new single space meters. For the multi space meter lots, each stall must be numbered and the machine(s) would be conveniently located with appropriate signage instructing the parker how to pay and where to go. The multi-space meter will accept coins, bills, credit cards and value cards. The machines can be networked and could be solar. The parking enforcement officer will have to pull a report from the multi-space meter in the lot and then drive around the lot to determine if the vehicle parked in a space is legal. Meter location sian Examoles of multi-soace meters $85,000 for individual off street meters and $125,000 for multi space meters in Lot #2 (1 unit) Lot 3# (2 units), Lot #5 (1 unit) and Lot #7 (1 unit). These costs include installation, software, one hand held. and collection cart. Additional cost for specifications and drawings is estimated at $10,000. Cost: Revenue: No additional revenue was projected by having new meters though some increase may be expected. Acllon TIme: First Quarter of 2008-Prepare specifications and bid Second Quarter of 2008-lnstall 3.5.2 Parking Rates Finding: The parking rates in Chula do not deter people from parking beyond the posted limits nor do the rates promote the use of the Park Plaza parking structure. In general, the parking rates do not differentiate the different parking space types enough to reflect their use and desirability. The current parking rates also do not allow the parking system to generate adequate revenue to operate the parking or revenues to improve the parking system. Also, if :~ Rich and Associates, Inc. =~ Parking Consultants - Planners !\.~tl 8-74 3-24 Final Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study the enforcement is not consistent, it makes it difficult to charge appropriately for parking. Recommendation: RICH recommends that meter rates increase as illustrated below. The increases are being proposed in order to ensure that the revenues of the parking district are reasonable in relation to the expenses incurred. The fee is intended, not as a revenue measure, but instead. to be sufficient in amount to defray the expense of the parking program" including the cost not only of installation. maintenance and supervision of meters, but also of other expenses required for traffic regulation, police regulation, and the provision of off-street parking facilities. The anticipated expenses include normal and reasonable operational expenses such as meter collection, enforcement. maintenance of public parking areas and acquisition and development costs related to the construction of new parking facilities, such as a public parking garage. RICH also recommends that the parking permit fees increase as illustrated in Table 3D (Chula VIsta ExlsIIng and Proposed Meter and Permit Rates). Table 3D Chula Vista ExlsIIr\1 and Proposed Meter and Permit Rates TIme Umlt Current Rate Proposed Rate On-street $0.05 per 10 minutes $0.25 per 30 minutes 30 minute meters Token per 10 minutes $0.1 0 per 20 minutes $0.25 per 30 minutes On-street 2 and 3 hour meters $0.05 per 10 minutes $0.25 per 30 minutes Token per 10 minutes $0.50 per 60 minutes $0.10 per 20 minutes $0.25 per 50 minutes Off-street 4 hour meters $0.05 per 30 minutes $0.25 per 30 minutes $0.10 per 60 minutes $0.50 per 60 minutes $0.25 per 150 minutes Off-street 10 hour meters $0.05 per 30 minutes $0.25 per 60 minutes Token per 30 minutes $0.10 per 60 minutes $0.25 per 150 minutes Permits $54.00 per Quarter $120 per Quarter Permits For lots 2 and 3 $54.00 per Quarter $180 per Quarter Cost: No costs since the new parking equipment will come with the increased rates. Revenue: The projected increase in revenue is shown in Table 3E (Chula VIsta Projec;1ed Two-Year Meter and Permit Revenues) for the first and second year of operation. ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. ~ Parking Consultants - Planners !\l.f.!! 3-25 Final 8-75 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking S1udy Table 3E Chula VIsta Projec;tecI Two-Year Meter and Permit Revenues Year 1 Year 2 On-street meters $183,950 $204,400 Off-street meters $122.800 $166,810 Permit $57.600 ActIon TIme: Second Quarter of 2008 Following is Table 3F (Parking Revenue and Expense Projecllon). a summary table of revenues and expenditures for a ten year period showing both historical data and projections. The purpose of this table is to illustrate that the proposed meter increases are reasonable and do not result in excess revenue to the City. The projected revenue beginning in 2007 is based upon the proposed meter rates. All of the revenue generated from the meters should continue to be placed in a designated parking fund and used for the expenditure of parking.related expenses. Lines 12 and 13 also reflect permit parking fees and overtime parking fines that are also utilized to fund maintenance and improvements in the parking district. Table 3F Parking Revenue and Expense Projecllon FY 2005 FY 2006 FY2007 FV 2008** FY 2009(3) FY2010(4) FY 2011 FY FY2013 FY2014 2012**(5) METER REVENUE(6) On-5treet Meters $176,527 $147,467 $166.307 $179,445 $193.914 $193.914 $193.914 $218,153 $242,392 $242.392 Off.Street Meters $88,314 $69,469 $71.027 $75.928 $162.652 $162,652 $1 62.652 $182,983 $203,315 $203.315 Total Eltlmated Meter -.nue(1) $264.841 $216.936 $237.334 $255.373 $356,566 $356.566 $356.566 $401.137 $445.707 $445,707 OPERATING EXPENSES(8) Enforcement stoff $142.885 $149,381 $149,381 $196.630 $204,495 $212.675 $221.182 $230,029 $239,230 $248,799 Meter Collection Stoff $39,351 $81.407 $18,954 $19.712 $20,501 $21.321 $22.173 $23.060 $23,982 $24.941 Administration Staff $117.039 $108,909 $108,909 $117.796 $122.508 $127,408 $1 32,504 $137.805 $143,317 $149,049 Maintenance $0 $8,435 $6.921 $571,000 $27,370 $28,464 $457,998 $30.787 $32,018 $33.299 Utilities $18,210 $16,623 $16,697 $17.365 $18,059 $18,782 $19.533 $20,314 $21,127 $21.972 SUpplies and Services $20.240 $24.421 $9.149 $33,900 $35.256 $36,666 $38,133 $39,658 $41,245 $42,894 Total Estimated Elcpensoo(2)(7) $337,725 $389.176 $310,011 $956,403 $428,189 $445,316 $891 .523 $481,6S3 $500,919 $520.954 Net -..nue 1$ 72,884) 1$172.240) ($72,677) 1$701.030) 1$71.623) 1$88.750) ($534,957) ($80.S16) 1$55.212) ($75.247) Parking Permit Revenue $35.996 $34,083 $24.729 $41.273 $57.600 $57,600 $57,600 $64,800 $ 72,000 $72,000 Meter Fine Revenue $46,939 $59,668 $60,047 $119,914 $147,115 $147,115 $147,115 $1 65,505 $183,894 $ 183,894 Total other Revenue $82,935 $93,751 $84,776 $161,187 $204.715 $204,715 $204,715 $230,305 $255,894 $255.894 TOTAl. REVENUE $10,051 ($78,489) $12,099 ($539.843) $133,092 $115,_ ($330,242) $149,788 $200,682 $180,647 ** Rafe Increase (1) Actual reported revenue for 2004- through 2006 (2) Actual reported operating expenses for 2004 through 2006 13) The effect of the rate Increase for 2008 is 50% fhe first year and 100% the second year 14) For the third and fourth years during each rate Increase, cycle has no projected increases 15) Rofe increases every four years after 2008 increase are 25%: 12.5% first year, 25%second year and 0% fhird /fourth years 16) The revenue increases assume thof enforcemenf will be changed as recommended in the report 17) Operating expenses from 2008 and beyond are increased of 4% per annum ~ Rich and Associates, Inc, 3.26 =~ Porklng Consultants. Plonners Final ~~t! 8-16 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking S1udy 3.5.3 Parking Allocation Finding: The City of Chula Vista has two different types of on-street parking meters. The 30-minute and two hour on-street meters are sufficient based on the land uses and the typical average stays. Recommendation: Implement the following changes to the allocation of certain time limit designations within the District. On-street Parkina The two-hour parking should be the dominant duration for on-street parking as it suits the needs of the majority of customers and visitors. Individuals requiring more than two hours for parking should be directed to off-street parking areas. The other duration that should be found on-street is 30 minute parking for use as pick-up and drop off stalls or very short-term parking. The 30 minute parking should be located as either the first or last stall on the block face where needed. Finally, in areas where there is no demand for customer-visitor parking, ten-hour on-street meters could be used to add to control over these spaces and to generate revenue. Off-street Parkina For the off street lots with meters, they are either four hour or ten hour meters. As recommended in Parking Revenue Control, four lots should be equipped with multi- space meters. For Lots 2 and 3 on Landis, RICH recommends that they be converted to three- hour time limits. Lots 2 and 3 on Landis Avenue between E and F Streets and Lot 5 on Madrona and Third Avenue are not providing sufficient customer and visitor parking due to the large number of 1 O-hour meters in these lots, since the 1 O-hour meters are primarily utilized by employees. This allocation of spaces decreases the amount of parking available to visitors. Based on the land uses in the area, it is more appropriate for these spaces to be utilized by customers and visitors. Therefore the number of permit or long term spaces should be limited. As more development occurs however, there should be a reduction to not more than 30 percent of the spaces as permit or long term parking in Lots 9, 10 and 11. At that point, the majority of the spaces should be two or three- hour and then sell permits specifically to these lots at a premium. Permit Parkina Although, RICH supports permit parking and believes it should be maintained, the permits should be priced higher in certain parking areas, speCifically for lots 2 and 3. The rate should be at least 150% higher than the parking permit fee in the other lots. This will provide ample daytime parking for customers and visitors in Lots 2 and 3 since the fee increase will likely result in fewer permits being sold for these lots. Those employees who elect to not pay the premium fee to park in these two lots will likely park in the Park Plaza parking structure, which currently provides free public parking. In addition, permits City--wide should be issued for specific lots. Many stakeholder expressed frustration that they were unable to find a space in a lot even though they ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. ~ Parking Consultants - Planners 1tI.f!! 3-27 Final 8-77 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking study had purchased a permit. A permit today is merely and hunting license for a space in any lot. Cost: Cost for signage change estimated at $5,000 Revenue: No impact projected at this time ActIon TIme: Second Quarter of 2008 3.6 Parking Facilities 3.6.0 Park Plaza Parking structure Finding: This parking structure is critically underutilized. During the turnover and occupancy on December 14, 2006 the structure was only 41 percent occupied at peak hour and on December 15, 2006 it only reached peak occupancy of 33 percent. Based on normalizing the data, RICH would project that the typical average occupancy is about 40 percent. This facility represents a parking asset and in the overall plan, this parking will be promoted for employees (free) and as a free parking alternative for customerS/visitors who need or want to stay longer than two hours. The Park Plaza Parking Structure signs are old and fading so they are difficult to find. The lighting in the structure and stair towers is insufficient and this may be a reason employees do not use the structure. The structure is not easily identified as public parking nor is it easily seen due to the fact that it is set back from F Street and Third Avenue. Finally, the structure needs rehabilitation. There is spa lied and crack concrete that needs to be repaired, exterior spandrel walls need repairs, and the stair towers need repairs. Recommendation: Implement the following improvements. . Upgrade locational and directional signage to the parking structure. . Upgrade signage in the parking structure identifying floors, where certain groups can park, and finally way finding signage in the parking structure to tell a parker where they are going to get to Third Avenue. . Lighting within the parking structure needs to be upgraded to have at least six foot candles across the floors with 30 foot candles at the vertical cores (stairs and elevators). . Re-stripe the parking floors. :~ Rich and Associates, Inc. =<:: Parking Consultants - Planners !1~1."! 3-28 Final 8-78 Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study . Have a conditions study done and complete structural and cosmetic repairs to the structure. . Consider adding an elevator to the north end of the parking structure to facilitate employee and customer/visitor access to parking. . The lower level spaces will be allocated to short-term parking (three hours) and the upper floors all day parking. Cost: Costs to be determined Revenue: Zero ActIon TIme: Third Quarter of 2008-Conduct StUdy Fourth Quarter of 2008-lmplement improvements Signs and lighting are an issue in the Park Plaza parking structure. This structure would be more inviting with better lighting and signage to direct and let people know this is long term free parking. '1' There is not a sizable sign at the entrance to the Park Plaza parking structure. There are signs in the median of the road, though they are very difficult to read and not all cars can see the signs. All entrances should read free parking to encourage customers staying beyond two hours to park here. ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. =~ Parking Consultants - Planners ~~!! 3-29 Final 8-79 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study Examples of signs to help locate free parking for customers/visitors 3.6.1 Meter Color Coding Finding: The existing meters are not marked to indicate the time limit for the meter, which is confusing for parkers. There needs to be an easy way for parkers to identify if they are at a 30-minute, 2-hour, or 10-hour meter to avoid pulling into a space then realizing they won't have enough time and having to find another space, which affects traffic congestion and parking availability. Recommendation: Designate a color to represent each parking limit then implement by painting the entire pole or painting a band of color just below the meter head. There are also color bands that can be placed at the top of the meter head that may be considered. Cost: $5,000 Revenue: None AcIIon TIme: Second Quarter of 2008 3.6.2 street Curbs Finding: The street curb painting is inconsistent. ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. -= <:: Parking Consultants - Planners !1IS"t! 3-30 Final 8-80 Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study Recommendallon: Street curbs should only be painted for no parking where required and for fire hydrate locations. Curbs should not be painted to reflect the type of parking available. Cost: No estimates were made at this time. Additional analysis must be completed to quantify the areas to be painted Revenue: None ActIon TIme: Fourth Quarter of 2008- Conduct Analysis First Quarter 2098- Commence Work 3.7 Bicycles as an Alternate Mode of Transportation 3.7.0 Bicycling as an A1tematlve to DrMng Finding: There is a need for a program to promote bicycle usage in Chula Vista and to make traveling to downtown by bicycle safer and more appealing. Recommendation: Following the UCSP in promoting alternate modes of transportation and creating a more pedestrian friendly downtown, consider making Chula Vista a more bicycle friendly downtown and providing adequate and useable bicycle parking. Consider creating a bike route to the downtown and creating a marketing program to promote bicycle use as an alternative to driving. Create a special event to promote bicycles in an effort to help create alternative modes of transpartation, which in turn cuts down on the number of parking spaces needed. Cost: To be determined Revenue: Zero ActIon TIme: Fourth Quarter of 2008 3.7.1 Bicycle Parking Finding: Chula Vista does have bicycle racks, though they are difficult to find. There are walls built around some of the bicycle racks that hide the rack. There is no signage directing bicyclists to where the racks are located. In keeping with the vision ot the Urban Core SpecifiC Plan, integrating convenient and accessible bicycle racks is an impartant component of encouraging greater use of bicycles and other modes of transportation in the downtown Chula Vista. 3-31 Final ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. ~ Parking Consultants - Planners ~S-J! 8-81 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study This is an existing bicycle rack in downtown Chula Vista. The placement of this rack will impede pedestrian fraffic from the crosswalk when the bicycle rack is full. Recommendation: Install new bicycle racks in the downtown and institute a marketing program to promote new locations to park bicycles. In following the UCSP, racks should be placed near bus stops to encourage people to use the bus, particularly stops with a high ridership count like the intersection of Third Avenue and H Street. In areas where commuters will use bicycle storage it is ideal to provide upgraded bicycle facilities such as a bike locker or covered rack or locating bicycle racks in an existing or new parking structure that provides additional security from the elements. In many ways, bicycle parking should be looked at like parking cars in that areas for bicycle parking must be convenient, well lit and signed. Racks must allow for adequate space to easily lock the bike to the rack. Locations for bicycle parking should mirror locations of automobile parking to encourage the use of multiple modes of transpartation. Existing parking lots create a good place for bicycle racks. The use of one parking space can provide adequate space for several bicycles. Begin by placing racks in lots with the highest parking demand. As racks are more heavily utilized, add additional racks in other locations with high parking demand. Cost: $10,000-$75,000 depending on the number and style of racks, signs and marketing materials. Revenue: None =:~ Rich and Associates, Inc. -~ Parking Consuitants - Planners !tJ~t! 8-82 3-32 Final Chula VIsta Downtown Par1dng S1udy ActIon TIme: Fourth Quarter of 2008 Best Practices for Selecting BIke Racks: . Racks should allow bike frame to make contact at two points. Most commuter bikes do not have kickstands. . Provide adequate spac;:e for multiple bikes to be stored at one rack. . Allow for popular "U" shape lock. . Racks should be placed where they will not impede upon pedestrian traffic, though they need to be readily identifiable. Bicycle racks should not be hidden. . Provide clear signage indicating bicycle parking. < . A complete guide to bicycle parking, written by The Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals, can be found at httc://www.bicvclinainfo.ora/de/carkauide.cfm. Two examcles of recommended bike racks Marketing BIcycles In a Downtown: . Promote National "Ride Your Bike to Work Day/Month" in May. There are many communities throughout the U.S. that participate including the City of San Diego. Information can be found through the League of American Bicyclists at www.bikeleaaue.ora. . Engage in a Bicycle Friendly Community Campaign and awards communities who are bicycle friendly and promote walk-able, safe communities. For additional information visit www.bicvclefriendlvcommunitv.ora. . Embrace the concept thaI. "Communities that are bicycle-friendly are seen as places with a high quality of life. This often translates into increased properly values, business growth and increased tourism. Bicycle-friendly communities ':3:: Rich and Associates, Inc. ~ Parking Consultants - Planners !U~!! 3-33 Final 8-83 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking S1udy are places where people feel safe and comfortable riding their bikes for fun, fitness. and transportation. With more people bicycling. communities experience reduced traffic demands, improved air quality and greater physical fitness." Visit www.bicvclefriendlvcommunitv.ora for more information. . Work collectively with the Chula Vista Chamber and TAVA to promote bicycle events into flyers and newsletters. 3.8 Parking Requirements for Current and Future 3.8.0 Traffic Impacts Finding: Based on a cursory analysis by RICH. there were no issues with respect to traffic. All of the parking areas are easily accessible with the exception of Lot 6 and the Park Plaza parking structure. though this is because of its location and not traffic concerns. Additionally. there were no traffic concerns based on the future parking projections. It was noted that the current on-street parking arrangement on Third Avenue. that incorporates angled parking. has a traffic calming effect, which slows down traffic. This is a positive condition. The level of additional traffic generated from the projected "worse case" parking demand based on UCSP maximum build-out represents a 50 percent increase in parking spaces needed from what is projected for the current condition. The UCSP and this report assume that there will be additional parking nodes that will reduce the amount of traffic that will drive through the downtown. Recommendation: Continue to monitor traffic flow within the downtown and the levels of service at principle intersections as development occurs and parking changes/additions are implemented. Cost: Zero Revenue: Zero ActIon TIme: On-going 3.8.1 Current Parking Analysis Finding: Overall there is a surplus of approximately 1 .103 parking spaces within the District and the area south to H Street. However. there are several blocks along Third Avenue that have deficits (blocks 9 and 10). As identified earlier. the Park Plaza parking structure is underutilized. Recommendation: The parking demand analysis identified an overall parking surplus. but also a deficit in certain blocks such as blocks 2. 3, and 12 on the north side and blocks 9 and lOon the south side. If the recommendation in 3.6.0 to increase the use of the Park Plaza parking structure is implemented. this should ::3::: Rich and Associates. Inc. .::=::;::: Parking Consultants - Planners !Hftl 3-34 Final 8-84 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study alleviate the parking demand issues on blocks 2,3 and 12. The deficits on blocks 9 and 1 0 will be reduced when the Social Security Office relocates, and these blocks should also be utilizing the Park Plaza parking structure for employee parking. Cost: Zero Revenue: Zero ActIon TIme: Completed- Current Analysis Ongoing-Future Analysis 3.8.2 Potential Parking Impact of exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) sites Finding: At the time of RICH's review, the Redevelopment Agency had entered into Exclusive Negotiating Agreements for the development of four public parking lots. These sites are Lots 3, 6, 9 and 10 and are shown on Map 9 (ENA Development Sites), included in Section 2. RICH analyzed the loss of parking that would occur with each development and confirmed that development of any of the ENA sites would reduce the number of parking spaces available in the District. Each potential development site is further analyzed below: . Lot 3 has high utilization, with occupancy averaging 80 percent for most of the day. This lot provides a large supply of parking and is central to many businesses on Landis Avenue and Third Avenue. Additionally, a number of permit holders park in this lot. Loss of this parking lot would have a significant impact on the District. . Lot 6 has a high occupancy, averaging about 70 percent. Due to the small lot size it has a lower capacity and is hampered by a difficult ingress and egress. The loss of parking spaces on this site could have some impact on surrounding businesses. There are other parking areas that can make up for any loss of parking however. . Lot 9 has occupancies of around 90 percent at peak time. The loss of spaces due to the ENA development will have some impact on parking supply in this area, although there are other parking areas that can make up for the loss of spaces. . Lot 10 has average occupancy of approximately 85 percent but had peak time occupancy of almost 1 00 percent at two time intervals over the two survey days. This is largely based on the 10-hour spaces having a high number of permit holders. The loss of spaces in this lot will have minimal impact on customers, although permit holders would need to be redirected to other parking. There are surrounding parking areas that can make up for the loss of parking. Recommendation for Lot 3: Maintain Lot 3 as a publiC parking lot ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. _~ Parking Consultants - Planners !1~J.! 3.35 Final 8-85 'p ~ ~ ~ ~ E Q(s~ t:: ~ e C::D::D ~ ~ .. ;0. ~ I~ ~))) >:i!zs ~ ~ CIlC ~ ~ ~mt5 ~~ l-""'"iF >g~ ~ Q ~j1 .1';.; i !' lili ' - dh.. ~ ti= i ~ I ~I:"fl . i oS! ;:: i;! hf! G'~ m - .i Ii ~ a nil -"'11 ~ i 01 l> Chula VIsta Downtown Parking Study of about -500 spaces if this build-out were to occur with no additional parking provided. If the build out of these blocks occurs structured parking will be required even if the goals of alternate transpartation are met. Additionally, additional residential development that might curb the number of vehicles coming into the downtown and increase the likelihood of shared use parking will still not meet the demands of the projected deficit. There are several possibilities for additional parking in the downtown: . Nodal Parking: One option would be to create nodes of parking at the north and south ends of Third Avenue then develop a trolley system along Third Avenue. This might be accomplished by negotiating a shared parking agreement with the Gateway project at H Street and Third during evening and weekend hours, when the majority of their office uses are closed or have less clientele. This would serve as the south parking node. A property at or north of E Street would need to be developed as the north node. Finding property that is of sufficient size will be critical. The minimum dimensions for an efficient parking structure is 125 feet by 290 feet. The longer the site the more efficient the layout as it allows flat facades on the ends and one long side of the structure. . Conventional Parking Structure on Alternate SlIe: The possible parking structure sites identified are listed below and discussed more fully in Section 3.8.4; o The Baptist Church lot in combination with Lot 7 o Vacant lot on east side of Third Avenue between G and Alvarado Streets o The west side of Church between E and Davidson Streets. . Altemate Parking Structure OptIons: There are multi-level parking facilities that can be constructed on smaller sites. This type of parking facility and uses a mechanicallitt to place vehicles in a multi story structure. While this requires a smaller footprint, there are operation limitations that generally restrict its use to residential projects with little turnover parking. Those limitations include longer wait time to retrieve vehicles and vehicle height limitations. 3.8.4 Possible Parking structure Sites Finding: There is currently no need to construct additional parking, but as part of RICH's analysis, three parking structure sites were identified for future consideration, if necessary. These sites are shown on Map 10 (Po1enftal Parking Structure StIes) on the following page. All estimates of the parking structure footprints and the parking space capacities are bosed on aerial maps that do not allow exact site dimensions to be determined. For each parking structure site we assumed grade and two supported levels. For each site the City should consider incorporating bicycle amenities such as racks, lockers and possibly shower facilities. Depending on the site location, the City should consider incorporating ground floor commercial uses; ::::::::: Rich and Associates, Inc. =:0:: Parking Consultants - Planners !11.f.tl 3-37 Final 8-87 !~ . ~ q~ n e !! ~ ~ ~ i~ ~))) ! ! i ~ i ! i I !~.' H! ~i ~ "V iil ,I 'if I iI! . >- CO ii f; ;ill '; l' ~ 88 ()(IJ~ l!:D5l! >:i!~ ~~~ >~C 0-< "11 Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study especially those that would promote provide services to employees of the downtown. Finally, the parking sites should incorporate transit options where possible and such amenities such as recharging stations for hybrid/electric vehicles. Site l-Block 6: Vacant lot on east side of third Avenue between G and Alvarado This site is approximately 300 feet wide and 380 feet long and is currently vacant. Assuming setbacks around the site, a preliminary parking footprint was developed for this site. A typical floor could accommodate 228 spaces assuming four parking module. A module consists of a parking stall/aisle/parking stall. If we assume grade and two supported floors, the capacity could be as much as 640 spaces. This site and the possible parking structure footprint could accommodate a mixed-use component on the Third Avenue side. There could be as much as 31 ,000 square feet of space created on the ground floor. Since there are up four modules and only two are required for the traffic flow, the amount of occupied space could continue to the second and third floors facing Third Avenue. Therefore a maximum of 93,000 square feet of mixed- use space could be developed. One of the positive aspects of this site is the size, which provides several development options and allows the incorporation of occupied space at a minimum on the ground floor, which gives a streetscape top the parking structure. Additionally, the lot is currently vacant so all of the parking built on this site will be a net add. The drawbacks of this site are the fact that the City does not own the site and it is several blocks from the core. The distance from the core however, does accomplish the vision of the UCSP in terms of encouraging a more walk able community. Site 2-Block 4: City's Lot 7 or Bapttst Church lot In combination with the City's Lot 7 With both properties, this site is approximately 180 feet wide and 400 feet long and there are currently +/- 106 spaces on the two lots. City Lot 7 is approximately 240 feet long and is large enough to accommodate a parking structure site, but the functional design would be less efficient than a larger site and should only be considered if the Baptist Church lot is unavailable. The site dimensions with both lots would accommodate a two module parking structure which would leave a +/- 60 foot setback from Church Avenue that could be developed into surface parking, green space, pocket park, or even a site for the Farmer's Market on the surface lot. The preliminary parking structure layout on this site would accommodate approximately 420 spaces for a net add of approximately 31 4 spaces. A typical floor would contain 156 spaces. The positive aspect of this site is that it is centrally located and compliments the Park Plaza parking structure on the west side of Third Avenue. Parking demand could be accommodated from both northern and southern Third Avenue. Also, the setback from Church could provide a green space or a home for the Farmer's Market. The drawback of the site is that the City does not own all of the property proposed. ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. ~:o:: Parking Consultants - Planners !\}.fJ~ 3-38 Final 8-89 Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study SIte 3- Block 1: west side of Church between E and DavIdson streets There are two options on this site that would incorporate the vacant parcel on the corner of Third Avenue and E Street and the northeast corner of the block bounded by E Street and Church Avenue including the area up to the City's Lot 11 . The first option is a parking structure only on the east half of the block. This area could support a parking structure of approximately 250 spaces on grade and two supported floors. This would net 216 spaces. This scenario contemplates the retention of the vacant parcel on the northwest corner for development and providing parking for any new development on that site in the new parking structure. The second option would be an "L" shaped parking structure that would incorporate the vacant parcel. At a minimum the ground floor of this parcel should be developed as mixed use space with two levels of parking above. These two floors would tie into the main parking structure as described above. About 16,000 square feet could be developed for mixed-use space. Additionally, the air rights above the parking structure. at least on the northwest corner could be developed as residential. This footprint could accommodate approximately 375 spaces for an estimated net of 341 new spaces. The positive element of this site is that it creates encourages parking and walking down Third Avenue. the site(s) is not owned by the City. a northern of parking and The negative aspect is that Recommendation: Continue to monitor the parking occupancies and re-evaluate parking every two years. The following sections below address the timing and development costs issues. 3.8.5 TIming for Addlflonal Parking Development Parking development in downtown Chula Vista will need to be coordinated with demand to ensure that as development occurs the City has the appropriate amount of parking. The City will need to position itself so that if the need for additional parking arises it will have the financial SOlvency to construct additional parking. Deciding when to initiate the development of a parking structure will depend first and foremost on need. Financial costs must then be considered in terms of viability and timeframe. However, deciding when development demands warrant the parking structure is a relatively straightforward calculation. RICH prepared the following formula to assist the City as a decision making tool. The model works by using the building gross floor area (existing and proposed) as the variable in a decision making flow chart that assists with determining when new parking demand justifies a new parking structure. 3.39 Final ~ Rich and Associates, Inc. :;:: Parking Consultants - Planners N~!! 8-90 Chula Vista Downtown Parking Study New Parlclng Threshold Calculallon WorkshElet Part A: Detennlnlng Floor Area Total Built Gross Floor Area For Entire Downtown: (+) Proposed New Gross Floor Area: (=) Total Existing and Proposed New Gross Floor Area: Part B: Determining Parlclng Need Total Existing and Proposed New Gross Floor Area: (Xl 2.37 Parking Stalls Per 1,000 Square Feet: (=) Total Parking Stalls Demanded: (-) Existing Off-Street Parking: (=) New Parking Demanded: Part C: Decision Guide New Parking Demanded: (Xl 85%: (=) Minimum New Parking Needed: (If) Minimum New Parking Needed Is: Optimal Capacity of the New Parking Structure then Initiate Project (Or) Minimum New Parking Needed Is: Optimal Capacity of Next New Parking Structure then Delay Initiation Until The Above Condition Is Met 3.8.6 Parking SIte/DeSlgn Decision Matrix As development occurs within the district. the City will have to address the need for additional parking. Several possible parking structure sites were identified in Section 3.8.4 and a formula that can be utilized as a measure for determining when a parking structure is necessary is also included in Section 3.8.5. RICH has developed Table 3G (Parlclng Site and DesIgn Decision MatrIxl, located on the following page, for the City to use to analyze both the feasibility of identified sites and the potential design of each site. 3-40 Final :~ Rich and Associates, Inc. =4:: Parking Consultants - Planners ~.fJj 8-91 Table 3G Parking Site and Design Matrix Please score each site based on the criteria below. The score should be a whole number from 1 (lowest score) to 5 (highest score). In each criteria category, the same score may be given to more than one site or parking structure layout on a site. Some criteria may be difficult to score such as cost per net added space since Rich and Associates will be filling in this data. We have left these criteria closed because we will score them when we have the numbers. VloiQ~r Site "*>Ib Criteria iii'II,"i, 1. Vehicle Ingress / Egress !!I!!'!~!,i .,1'''' 2. Ability 01 driver to find structure ' !II!I ",,, '''' 3. Effects on adjacent properties "., 4. Revenue potential !!!"t!!' '", '" !~i 5. Pedestrian access and wayfinding !!111 6. Meel goais lor spaces needed. iii~," .....',i 7. Economic benefils to area Ili!!Y' ",.!,i! 8. Effects an back entrances or loadlng/unloadl ":,!~:::! 9. Efficiency 01 parking structure I!~!!J ", ,...., 10. Dlsrupllon on-site and downtown '!I!~!! ....i........ 11 . Expansion capability 01 parking structure i,,1 12. User group served: Commuters iiiii!~: . "" Employees ,ii!$lii "Iii, Visitor/Customers i'::!!!~,lii 13. Cost/net added space ",'" iii"~, 8-92 Chula VIsta Downtown Parking study 3.8.7 Parking Development Costs. Parking Improvement Costs and Financing While there were no immediate recommendations for a parking structure, this section covers possible parking structure development costs and how they may be financed. The construction costs for a parking structure of approximately 300 spaces, which would be considered the minimal number of spaces for scales of economy, is estimated at $15,000 to $18,000 per space. Project soft costs without land costs are generally between 1 7 and 20 percent, and finance costs are between 7 and 10 percent of the project costs. There are other costs for parking improvements such as new meters, multi space meters etc. No specific funding mechanism has been identified, though there are several options described below. . The first is to fund projected capital costs and increased operating costs from increased revenues based on the General Fund receiving the net revenue from parking fixed at the projected 2007 level if available. Based on the projection of revenue and expenses through FY 2014 however, there is no projected net revenue. . Include possible support from the Redevelopment Agency using tax increment to fund improvements. There appears to be approximately 12 years left in the redevelopment area, and this could be used to fund some or all of the proposed improvements. . Use the existing PBID to fund improvements. . Federal funding with highway/transit funds may be possible depending on the project, which would have to incorporate some type of multi-modal functions. The process is lengthy and there is competition from other projects/cities for these dollars. Conclusion The findings and recommendations presented in this report represent a parking management system that addresses management practices and operations necessary to create and maintain an effective parking district. For a summary of all the findings and recommendations described above, please refer to Exhibit 9 (Table 3H-Chula VIsta Findings and Recommendations MatrIx). ~ Rich and Associates. Inc. -::: Parking Consultants - Planners lY,f,!! 3-41 Final 8-93 Exhibit 1 City of Chula Vista Parking '" .. . Parking Is One Of The Biggest Factors In Overview of Parking Successful Downtowns .. . Traffic Congestion Is Related To Parking .. Best Practices . Parking Is In Reality A Transportation Node (Riding <> Wa1king) \ , . Modality, Ridership And Shared Parking ~ February 15,2007 , Axe Among The Most Desirable Ways To Reduce Parking Demand S S ~ = !\I!:ll Improving Existing Parking .. . An Examination Of Current Parking Management, Allocation, Pricing and Operations . "Best Practices" Approach To Improving The Efficiency Of Existing Resources. . Strategic Plan Of Implementation '" ... a e JUcn Parking Allocation .. . lndividual Economic Decision . Free Parking Like Free Gas . Transportation Influenced By Economics s =' JllCH Parking Management .. . City Department(s) . Contract Management . Local Businesses and Retailers . Business Associations . Parking Committee .. ... ;;E;;:: e JUCI! Parking Enforcement Strategies .. . Carrots - Validation program - Concentric pricing - Marketing material -lncentive to pay fine early - Amnesty day - Tourism lncentive ;;E;;:: e . .. ... 8-94 1 Parking Enforcement Strategies Sticks - Dedicated enforcement officers - Consistency is key! - Increased fines for multiple infractions - Use technology - Meters are reminders, not just tax collectors .. _~'I'OUl'\~Dp YllU$""l<<)~MlCIIIQ"AND1'Il~sa14 SAYS,"~RJR~AAla'UI' a ;;;;;;;l ~Ol Signs - Pedestrian - . Way Finding - Pedestrian Link Between Parking Areas and Destination S'l =' !Ucti .. -- -- Pedestrian Strategies .. . Enhance Pedestrian Experience . Reduce Presence Of Parking Lots . Way-Finding Signs . Create Pedestrian/Bicycle Paths . Zoning To Achieve Urban Density & Variety of Land Uses ,. .. S'l =' !\lCH Signs - Traffic .. . Five Main Types - Hierarchy Is Important Four Oriented Towards Automotive Traffic - Introduction - Direction - Location .. , , - Identification a ;;;;;;;l ~Ol Pedestrian Activity . Critical Part Of Successful Downtowns (pedestrian Activity = Economic Activity) . A Mode Used Whenever We Change Transportation . Key Concerns: Safety, Cleanliness, Traffic and Parking - .. a ;;;;;;;l lUql Parking Strategies . . On-Street Parking Is Your Best Friend . Charge For Parking . Change Zoning To Parking Maximum . Make As Much Parking Public As Possible . PubliclPrivate Partnerships . Parking Signs & Marketing Are Crucial . .. a ;;;;;;;l !"CH 8-95 2 Parking Operations . Parking Management . Pricing Strategies . Defining Users . EquipmentlTechnology ~ :::s JUCH Marketing " . Customer and Business friendly practice . Distribution with other downtown promotional material . Advises individuals and businesses of upcoming changes to the parking system . MarketinglEducation-Ongoing Process . RadiolPrintlWeb Site JI' . Park & Shop ~ = ~IC1! " Supply and Demand Analysis " Parking Equipmentffechnology . Multi Space Meters . Pay By Space Meters . Pay and Display . Electronic Payment . Meter less Parking . Networked Equipment Credit Card/Debit(Value) CardIValidations .. . " , , El = fUCH Shared Use Strategy No.....red.... 5bredWllll <GO '" ... "" ... '" '" .. . " . .,.% '" ~,4"~""'~ - ","^' - ~ . ....... __..... Ill"" ~""""NII) (Sb..r) , /..- .~;" ,./' +,r El = 8-96 3 i3l =0 !UCH Cost of Parking $16,000 per stall- Construction costs . $350 per stall-Operation and Maintenance for 1 year (assumes attendant parking) $50 per stall every year-Repair and Replacement Reserve Account ~ = RK;,lj User Fees Simplest method to implement . Benefactor is paying . Easy allocation through pricing . Can be combined with validation programs . Helps promote alternate transportation choices . Payment is matcbed to cost of parking i3l =' !UCH 3 3 , 3 3 ~ Key Issues 3 . Determine who will pay for parking . Assess how much parking private development projects will need ,. . Decide when to build public parking , ~ , i3l =' ~qj Paying For Parking 3 Opemting and Maintenance arc on- going Planning for RcpIacomont Four key sources to select from Call be combined. '" One time Capital cost to build. .. One time payment City gets money up-front May require building specific parking allocation according to what developer pays - "1 paid for SO stalls. I want 50 stalls." Developers may be resistant to on4going user fees or assessments Leaves Operating. Maintenance and Replacement cost> to City In Lieu Fee a = !UCH 3 .. " 8-97 4 Annual Assessment Difficult to administer as - changes in use or ownership may cause challenge of assessment Often unable to charge enough to cover all costs - becomes a burden to small business City left with up-front cost of building parking a a fUCH Financing Options Tax Backed Obligations general obligation bonds special assessment districts tax increment financing Revenue Bonds COPS a a !UCH w.._ PaynlIIT__&Frtngn UlItCylnsu_ ""'''' T....... Eqv\pmentMllntananCOl pIltlrlgSllppll..(Tlck../C~1 Unlfarms& CI..nlnSl FlKl'UllalMntIEm~ID'f'''TlIlllIng L9l&AacoIlntlng ~&O.mq. y.w.n...u:. Sllppll"" e.v.IorMaimnU1~' M..-pmWlt F.. bkJl:eepingF.... RepB-& AepblCllmlllll Fund' SnawRem_1 .-- "" T" """, ~').a.uum_2SltYatar11G~p"rE\orntllr ~2)S50J~JY.. = !UCli ...... "1,355 "'''' s,,"" 126.000 11,8110 $3,500 sa<'" " s",oo ...OO 55.000 ".. SS.'"' ......... ..,.,. m.oo "",3 $lII3.33 $3.00 19.83 Sll.87 SD.CO $3.33 $4.00 S8.33 18.33 11600 10.00 10.00 $110.00 18.33 $4.17 $30,000 SS,ODO ..SO<> ....... General Fund . " .. Easy to administer Financing for construction but on-going maintenance and replacement costs still an issue Challenge of competing City interests and responsibilities ,~ .. , , , a a fUCH ---- --------- ,_.... -.- '---'- ==-- .--- '- - - . " .'__~M_. ,,-- " " """"::'::::-- , "--- ..- , a a !UCH I~'-'='= ~ -- - " PRO FORMA 455 SPACE PARKING STRUCTURE BREAK EVEN ANAYLSIS BASED ON GO BOND ISSUE , , -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. _. .N. ~ - .. .. " .. - - - - - - - - - - ~- ~ - -IS"": .. -- - .- .- - , . -, - - -- - _a. -- - ~.; .. . . .. . " ~.- -" .- -- ... " .. -" - " --- -- ~- ~ -. _m. .. - - - .- - .-. - -- .- .- .- -- - --- ~ ~ ~ .m. -- w - - ..- .- . .- .,.. .- - - - - ~ I~ " , 8-98 5 PRO FORMA 45. SPACE PARKING STRUCTURE MARKET RATE ANALYSIS BASED ON GO BOND ISSUE .._- -r-- .--- 1 . -'-;""-,---- r-""-r--i--i"--T-.---n_. -, ~.. -, -. -, -. -. -. -. -. - ~ ~ ~ ~ "" "" .. ". .~ - - - - .. - - - .. - - ..... ..... ~.. ..... ..... -. ..... ..... " ..... ..... ..... " -- ..... .."..... "".- ..... -. ---..........,. ~...: ..... "-- .. . - " - ..- -' ..... "-- ".......... .... .~" ~- -" - -. ................., ..... -- ..... ..... -- " -- ..- - , "..- ~ ..... ~ - -- ..- m_ - --- ...... -." ~. ...... ....... ............ ....,...... tt.-..,..__... - - - -- - -- - .~ .- -- ~ =' ~CH AD!!le V5. Design I Layout __ ii;$"'=-~ 90 del!ree ~,~ ~Sz -.l'lk'" ~2:= ~ ......~ RamniUI!: Sloped Floor Semi-expres:!!l Expre!lll DeterminiQ2' Factors: Mixed-uses Capacity ~ Peak tramc flow ~ Expandability !\ICH Operational Considerations Cashiered vs. Cashierless ~ =' ~CH Operating costs Customer service Revenue accountability/maximization .. Site Selection Dimensions: Sbe Shape Efficiency Location: Proximity to major demand generators CODnectioDs to adjacent land-uses ~ ~ ~ User Friendly Considerations ~ . Plain . Active Wavfindimr . OUr IlId andle Lil!'btcores . OPUIUIVil'OlIment . SuppleDlellt artifitUllli.bt Maximize Visibilitv Acrau PUkinl Doon ~ = ~CH Vm:iadCOfell(ilUideolfMd) 8-99 Next Steps .. R&A Compiling and Analyzing Data March 8. 2007 - Presentation of Parking Study Findings and Charrette April 12, 2007 - Presentation of Par king Recommendations " a = ~CH . 6 City of Chula Vista Parking Study Findings March 8, 2007 s ~ District History . ParldDI District formed ill 1963 . In Lieu fee established in 1982. . Modification of In Lieu Fee lD 1989 . Park Plaza ParkiDg Structure huUt in late 19805 a 3 !UCH Parking Supply S!l => lUC];:' Study Area .. =--~ 1=:"..1 1......- !. J . 1~'1 -.- ~ d l if --- 1r_'~1~;:i:;lWr~~i!!F · -- -- -",".,"--"q-~- ~ -- ' I:~ I:I~ ,jl---C>>" I .'! , . , i~ .. '" . , a 3 lUCH Parking Study Process . . '" Parking Supply . " Oo-Street Parking Totals 600 Public Off-Street ParkiDg Totals 1,158 Public Parking Totals \,758 52% Private Parking Totals \,603 48% Total Parking in Study Area 3,361 \..." -J. '" . => I\l 8-100 1 Key Definitions . Turnover- The Dumber of times a vehicle is observed ill the same space: . OC1:upanq' - The length of time a space ill occupied by a vehicle . Circuit - The ohseJ'V9tion of each parking space ollce every two hoon . Block Face - A Dumber aDd letter designatioD for eacb block (A - Nortb Face, B -.East Face, C- Soutb Face, D-WestFace) . . , a ;;;;;;] ~ Friday Turnover and Occupancy a a IllCH Summary of Occupancy Study ~_'''_ fj~~! .1 . - -'- .-.-g.... . ~~-- ffl~~ " ------ --- ~ ----"... ~Q1 8-101 Thunday Turnover and Occupancy , , . . SI = lU Summary of Occupancy Study --- !i=~ I - . . - ,- .. - .. ... -.- . ----"oo" . _"'__''''_ a = ES ~~ ffl~~ -....---- ......- .......-..."..... Summary of Occupancy Study COll1pllrMlv. P.~ntlige OccupllnGy . i. :::1 It:: 1&30% i i 20" :!,o", l .. - ~ ~ .; II~:::::: - . l:all 11,aa 1:00 UO 5:001;!lO 11InafOllH...... I> SI = Illq< 2 Parking Demand Generation Factor . Based on exisdllglaad DlIe5 . Does Dot include changes to vehicle use patterDs, availability of alternate modes, walkability, de. envisioned byUCSP . Form based parking generation fac.tor is "best practice" . Rich calculated 1.37 sp /1,000 I.f. for aU land uses . Rich calculated factor supports UCSP factor of 1.0 sp I 1,000 Sol. for aD land USCI .. . .. ~ RIO! Current Demand . With 2.37 Factor Supply D<mand Surplus I (Deficit) . 3,361 2,253 1,108 With 2.0 Factor Supply nomand Surplus I (Deficit) .. - 3,361 1,901 1,460 ;;;;:;;: RICH Current Demand ENA Developments .. With 2.0 Factor Supply Demand Surplus I (Deficit) .. 3,147 1,901 1,246 .. 31 = lUqt Assumptions for Current Demand . + I ~ 40,000 s.t:. vacant space Dot re-occupied . Existing patterns ofvebicle nse at ~ 9!% . Typical daily parking demand . No changes to parking supply , , 31 ~ . . .. Assumptions for ENA . Assumes Developmcot OD Block I Block 2 Block 4 Block 12 Lot 10 Lot 9 Lot 6 Lot 3 . Developmeot elbulaates public parkJng on lot . Development supplies oD-site parking for project 31 = RICH .. .. .. Assumptions for UCSP . Assumes UCSP model for development only on east aDd west sides of Third Aveline .:Z.OFAR . 40% Residential . 40% CommerdaI . :ZO'-o Office . No DCW parkiDg provided a ;;;;:;;: ,!,CH 8-102 .. . ~ 3 UCSP Development . With 2.0 Factor Supply D=and Surplus I (Defic:it) . 3,012 2,890 122 ~ ~ ~ Late.IId....... . . ~ ~ Parking Revenue and Expenses - -- , "' . " " . . ~ . -- " . - , . .. ~ ~ => RICH Overall Findings . Lot Conditions Meters Signage and Way-Finding Signs in Lieu Fee Parking Financials , , ~ ~ RICH . ~ ~ ~ RICH In Lieu Parking ---..-..... "- "- "- "- "- "- "- - -. .... =."f - -.- -- -- :=.'::':- :::::.--"::. -..-- . -- -- --........ - ... ..0-00 .-. .-- ..~...... no- -. ... .. .. -- .. .. -.- ... ...." _n' -- I .-- ..- I .. "'. "- "- "- "- "- ",- "'. m_ ",- ~ no_ ----- 8-103 Next Steps R&A Preparing Recommendations . April 12, 2007 Community Meeting Presentation of Parking Study Recommendations ~ ~ l!'CH .. ~ 4 Chula Vista Parkl~ st~ Findings and Draft Recommendations April 12, 2007 Current Parking Demand .. iFINDING: OVerall there Is a surplus of parking l within the District although there are several blocks along Third Avenue that have deficits RECOMMENDATiON: [J Increase usage of Park Plaza parking structure i ~r'O "'. RSideJ;..implementil:lg strategies presented , , I , Current Plirk!ng Demand :FINDING: Park Plaza parking structure needs . improvement RECOMMENDATION: o Upgrade signage: directional and locational Cl Upgrade interior signage Q Imorove liohtiM , i Q Reslripe : Q Conduct condition study Cl Consider adding elevator to north end , Agenda l CJ Presentation of Findings and Draft , Recommendations QPublic Comment Period , l'i Current Parking Demand :FINDING: The Park Plaza parking structure is underutilized RECOMMENDATION: ClMake structure more user-friendly a Implement recommendations , , , , . Operatlona' R.comm.ndatlons Man....m.nt t-INUINl:i:t.,;rty naeas upaatea ana consistent ! parking policies RECOMMENDATION: bl Develop policies for operation and use of valet parking i Consider and develop residential parking , pi:lo........it pr.ogr?....., If needed o Maintain but revise in-lieu parking fee policy on ran annual basis Report out to community about parking policies, management and changes on annual I basis 8-104 1 Oper'lltlonal R8c0mmendatlons Management ; - iFINDING: Parking management is disjointed RECDMMENDATION: CJ Form a Parking Advisory Committee OAppoint one City staff person to serve as Parking Director , 11;1 establish separate parking fund l IJAssign marketing to TAVA , Oper'lltlonal Recommendations Management -- lFINDING: Marketing is done on a limited basis , . RECOMMENDATION: IJBudget $10,000 for marketing from parking revenues DMarketing should include web site, i ' . -~- tiooaLRewsletters to stakeholders etc. 10 Involve lAVA in implementation . Oper'lltlonal R8c0mmendatlons Parking Demand jFINDING: Inconsistent time periods available for parking in public lots RECOMMENDATION: o Remove 10 hour time periods in lots 2.3 and 5 IJAllocale 3 hour time periods in public lots ; employees arnrail day parkers to free I spaces in Park Plaza parking structure and designated lots within the District " Operational Recommendations Management i~; The parking district has not been effectively managed and sufficient funds expended which has lead to an inability to properly maintain and market parking in the District R!;:COMMENDATlON: a Management of the District should be based on a budget that is prepared annually based on standard . ts to maintain, operate and 1 I enforce parking o Parking revenues and fines generated within the district should be used for funding operating costs, capital repair costs and a capital fund to develop additional parking areas Oper'lltlonal Recommendations Parking Allocation IFINDING: Lots 2 and 3 on Landis are not providing enough customer/visitor parking RECOMMENDATiON: o FirSt phase- move all permit parking from these lots to Park Plaza parking structure o Second phase- monitor use of lots 2 and 3 and ; , ;, .~"""""'I""':/ S"'less than 85% consider i ! allowing permit parking back in these lots at a premium rate " Operational Recommendations Parking Operations !FINDING: Parking rates are too low 'RECOMMENDATION: o Increase" rates to $.25 per fifteen minutes for all except 10 hour meters IJ Increase rates to $.50 per hour for 10 hour ; !lJlncrease permit rale to $120.00 per quaner " 8-105 2 Operational Recommendations Parklnl Operations --- !FINDING: Difficult to identify the meter time limit lRECOMMENDATION: o Color code meters based upon length of stay o Put small signs on poles that are color coded and describe time limit of meter i , " Operational Recommendations Parklnl Operations -- )FINDINGS: Signage is inconsistent RECOMMENDATION: o Upgrade or provide signage: introduction, directional, locational and way finding CI Engage a sign consultant to design signage ;--' ~ +ecommendations for sign , , placement I " Parklnl & Re_nue Control IFINDING: On-street & off-street meters are outdated, many do not work. and cannot be repaired RECOMMENDATION: o Replace all on-street and off-street meters with electronic meters that accept a smart card [ ; _, ~s-flClefl-_) 10 Replace meters in lots 2,3,7,and 5 with multi- space meters that accept coins, dollar bills, credit cards and smart cards. " Operational Recommendations Parking Operations ;FINDING: Bicycle racks are difficult to find and I are outdated RECOMMENDATION: o Install new bicycle racks and market availability and locations o Develop a broader marketing campaign to , 1 ,.. cyctlnlSe- , IQPramoteuse of bicycles as alternate mode of transportation consistent with the UCSP " Operational Recommendations Parklnl Operations - iFINDING: Some paseos need improved lighting i and signage to increase use RECOMMENDATION: D Install signs at the entrances: street and lot sides ~ Rd-IaRdscape i , 10lnstallllghting features " Parking Facllltl_ !FINDING: Some parking lots in the downtown , core are not well-maintained RECOMMENDATION: o Repair lot 5 (remove surface, compact and resurface) and minor repair of Jot 2 OUpgrade lighting in lots 2,3,4,and 11 l es pe ots , , , , and 10 I CJ Improve signage DBetter maintain landscaping " 8-106 3 ParkIng Enfon:ement jFINDING: Enforcement Is Inconsistent .._~ jRECOMMENDATION: CJProvide two full time PEOs in District CJEstablish defined routes that are completed in two hour circuits CJAbandon Senwavs for PEOs if they must i operate In paIrs o Conduct license plate inventory to monitor shuffling DContinue monitoring permit parking and " issuance of multiple tickets Potential PlII'klng Conslde,.tlolUl with ENA Development ;FINDING: Development of ENA sites will reduce I the number of parking spaces available to the District RECOMMENDATION: CJAgency should prtorttize proceeds from the ~ale of parking lots to necessary capital rneRli>f<ljeel&within the Parking District CJStudy and review parking distrtct every 3 years . Potential Plll'klng Conslde,.tlolUl with ENA Development 'FINDING: Lots g and 10 have lower parking 1 occupancies and smaller capacities therefore development of lots has minimal impact RECOMMENDATION: CJ Use way finding and signage to direct customers/visitors to surrounding lots 8 and 11 D Plll'klng Enton:ement --_.. j FINDING: Parking fines are too low I RECOMMENDATION: o Increase overtime parking and expired meter fines from $12.00 to $20.00 CJ Increase fine for unpaid tickets from $24.00 to i i D For a 6 month period after implementation of I fine increase, issue courtesy tickets for first infraction ~ Potential Parking ColUllde,.tlons with ENA Development rNDING: Lot 3 currently has high utilization '~nd larger capacity and its location is central to many businesses RECOMMENDATION: Q Remove pennlt parking from lot and reevaluate occupancy n 0_, "," o1.occut, more effectively use Park ! Plaza parking structure and consider integrating replacement public parking as part of the development [J Maintain lot 3 as public parking if occupancy continues to be high after recommended changes n Potential Plll'klng ColUllde,.tlons with ENA Development iFINDING: Lot 6 has higher occupancy but lower ! capacity and has difficult ingress and egress and therefore will have minor impact RECOMMENDATION: Q First step: investigate possibility of agreement to lease space from Baptist Church i i ,u,u,e"lleVl!1llpment of a parking structure on Lot 7 and the existing Baptist Church parking lot ~ 8-107 4 Potentia' Future Parking N..... With Redevelopment of Third A_nue iFINDING: Should the Urllan Core Specific Plan (UCSP) be adopted, redevelopment may occur and cause changes to parKing demand RECOMMENDATION: Cl Study and review parking district every 3 years i , I " 8-108 Next Steps . " i' Consultant to finalize Recommendations . Consultant to prepare Final Report . Staff will prepare accompanying report and recommendations for public review . Final Re 0 d taff Report and Recommendations will be presented to City Council " 5 Table 2A Parking Supply Summary Exhibit 2 Block > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 100 200 300 400 Summary O~ Not Signed 28 5 16 26 22 5 102 , 5 Minute Metered 3 3 30 Minute Metered 3 2 2 7 One Hour Metered 3 2 4 6 3 3 7 28 Two Hour Metered 26 55 22 20 13 18 16 10 24 37 41 4 6 24 316 Ten Hour Meter 11 7 1 16 5 6 8 54 30 Minute Free 3 3 One Hour Free 4 4 Two Hour Free 25 21 20 12 78 Ten Hour Free 26 26 loading Zone 2 1 2 5 TOTALS 626 011__ Public Three Hour Free 254 254 All Day Free 407 407 Two Hour Metered 14 1 15 Four Hour Metered 27 9 32 51 43 162 Ten Hour Metered 35 20 61 42 65 43 52 318 Barrier Free (Handicap) 2 1 3 3 2 19 2 3 2 37 TOTALS 1193 Private Private/Reserved 66 83 59 57 29 122 109 848 91 30 4 28 52 4 46 31 32 1691 Barrier Free (Handicap) 3 1 2 4 23 3 2 3 41 TOTALS 1732 Summary 170 171 108 205 110 172 118 891 132 78 745 203 190 22 69 57 110 3551 On-Street Parking Totals Public Off-Street Parking T~tals PublIc Parking Tolall Private Parking Totals ToIal Parking In study Area 626 ]..ill 1819 1732 3551 Soruce: Chula VISta data and Rich and Associates Fieldwork, December 2006 8-109 Exhibit 2 TABLE 2A - Parking Supply Summary Block> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 100 200 300 400 Summary On_ 15 Minute Metered 3 3 30 Minute Metered 3 2 2 7 One Hour Metered 3 2 4 6 3 3 7 28 Two Hour Metered 26 55 22 20 13 18 16 10 24 37 41 4 6 24 316 Ten Hour Meter 11 7 1 16 5 6 8 54 30 Minute Free 3 3 One Hour Free 4 4 Two Hour Free 25 21 20 12 78 Ten Hour Free 26 26 Loading Zone 2 1 2 5 TOTAlS 626 011_ f!.!!2!k; All Day Free 407 407 Two Hour Metered 14 1 15 Four Hour Metered 27 9 32 51 43 162 Ten Hour Metered 35 20 61 42 65 43 52 318 Barrier Free (Handicap) 2 1 3 3 2 19 2 3 2 37 TOTAlS 1193 ~ Private/Reserved 66 83 59 57 29 122 109 848 91 30 4 28 52 4 46 31 32 1691 Barrier Free (Handicap) 3 1 2 4 23 3 2 3 41 TOTALS 1732 Summary 170 171 108 205 110 172 118 891 132 78 745 203 190 22 69 57 110 3551 On-Street Parking Totals Public Off-Street Parking Totals Public Parking Tolala Private Parking Totals ToIal Parking In Study Area 626 ~ 1819 1732 3551 SOurce: Chula Vlsta data and Rich and Associates Fieldwork, December 2006 8-110 M .. :c :E .. w ... o o N .. .... ~ ., J:l E ., u ., C ,;; .. ....... Q !! N ::J .,.c :E.... .. '" .... g .. a. ::J U U o ... c .. ~ g! o c ~ ::J .... E ... o o 0; ~i~ '# #. ~ '# * *' *' '# '# g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ o ... ~:~'~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~:~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:~I~ ~ ~I~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 M N M ~ M M m M M v ~'VI~ M ~ M'~ 0 ~ ~ ~ M ~I~ N M N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~! o o ;.; Co> f'o. ~i:!: t'\I N " o .. E ... o o ;.; E ... o o on ..;.. U C\ll. ~ "It'CO ... Co> IJ') N ::: N " o .. .......... co ...... (") 0 0 .... CO CO 0 ~ o CO 0 C'\I 10 .. .. o V N ~ M:N ~I .. .. .. o ~ 0 om 0 ~ .. .. .. ~ 0 M N ~ ~ '# ?fl. '# o ~ ~ M ~ , I ~i~ ~I~ .... ~ 0 m v '#.1'# ~Ig ","1" lX;11O ~ , co "It en ..- N N 00 N ~ 0 lO ...... ~ ~'''It N lOlO M .... (") N'~ N 10,M' E ... o o on .. .. .. .. .. .. .. g ~ (b r! ~ ~ 0 8 o ~ .. E ... o o ;.; u ::: ~ !;:: ..- ~ 0 ~ " o .. .. .. .. ..'.. .. .. .. ..' o ~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ 0 o In co !;:: ~I~ ~ lO N IJ'):O .... co lO ..- ~ E ... o o ;.; tfl.*'********** g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ffi 8 o ~ .. '# '# '# '* J"-. It) M co N ~ ~ E ... o 'i'! ~ EI ..., 01 l?1 ~I ., ii' ~ ~'N " " o .. " ~I~ " ~ ~ o .. I OilO ::! g ..-1..... , ~ I ;: NIl';; 0 ~ o LO IJ') ::: ~'..,. ('I') ********* (Oogga;~~~8 ~ ol~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. N ~ '" N ~!~!~ 10 CO ~ ~I~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ V'IO''lt MI~ I *" ffll?fl. 00 M o 0 ~ ~ ~ * '# ?J!. '# o CO 0 0 10 CO 0 0 m N ~ ~ 'It -.:'CO N "It CO "" MI~ E .. o 'i'! ~ ~ '#!'# g :e:~ o I 'I! i I C)C)OOOC)"ItC":lCOIOC)O).....'lQ'COO N ~ E .. o o 0; .. .. " .. ... U) a; .. - - -", "I,"1l 6i~ ~ " " o .. '#. '#1* '# '#. '#. '# *- ~oM~~g~t: C\I I,() ("') en N CO ,... N N M..... " 0; u; .. "C E .!l V E .E 6 m 0 a:l U 0 ..... ..... N N N .. .. .. .. t-- (7) I"- 0 V <0 0 ~ MiN ..... ~ ~ ~ "C E .!l V E C E I 6 I :;; il~ di * E _ V E ..: ...: -T ..c;: N N <.ll" M M ~ ~ ~ "C E V 0; E , "I" v~ ~~~~~~ o 10 0 0 0 .......... T"".......... VI~ 1 I 10 M co ''It ~ .. .. M 0 M 0 .............. OMOr--MO...... co N C) I'-- co OJ .. M ~ '" ................ .. o co 0 en r-- r-- co "It co r-- "It It) ...... It) .... .... N It) <0 '" ~ ~ ''It co (0 "lit ~I~ ~ ?ft.?ft?ft?ft. ?fl ~~~:;~ "lit. CDI~ ~ ~ "' M V N ~l.O~~t'-~~CD..... "," ~I. ~ ~ ~ .. v .... .... .. .... ... .... ... ?ft. ?fl?ft.?fl?ft.?fl?fl?ft.?ft. '#. '#.?ft. ?fl .:5 :::: ~ :2 rn l.O ro ~ re ~ fB :; ~ ~ m <0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t'- ........................ :;~g~~g~~~~~c;:; l.O ~ ~ ~ ~ ?ft.?ft?ft.?ft.?ft.?ft.?ft. ?ft. M 0 ~ 0 ..... (") l.O (") (") ~ co l.O (") ~ ..... ~ N l.OiC\l IN , ~ m ~I~ ~ M ~ ~I~ ?ft. '#.?ft.?fl?fl ~ r::: ~ ~ ~ C\I'~ <o:t ;:::! ~ ~ l.O ~ ..... ::: ~ g '" ~Ig ~I~ ;! I i I .....i..... ~ .E 6 ~ V .Ii: "C C .. .c.c ..2 000 ~ - "C V V 0; -l!' E'" ....!E " C .'- ::;) , ! '0 J! 0 III ~ Il [I~ ~ 0, 0 ~ :a ~ li5 'O-t:~-t: 'OQ; ~E~ElD~~ Q; :5 E S Q; Q; C\I ECO~l.OEE"o ~ ~ ~ -'i= .c ffi N l;: (") = N..... "C E $ ~ V Ii; E 0; E "C " -l!' <5 .. C E!l:: SiN "C "C.C v,.. $ ir V N E _ o ~ ~ .~ 'O12l E'.. $ .c V N E _ o .E . N 'E "C ~ "C -0 2l 2l $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ....[ E ~ Q; N N ~'g ~ ~ '0 '5 E ~ :: ~ x x -'i= 0 J:: .... 'E 'E N N <1< 0 U m 0 U 0 m 0,0 m 0 @ ~:~ ~,~!~ ~ 0 ::: ::: ~ ~i;:::! (") ~ rc rc1t) 0 0 0 g!glg g gig ""';IN C\I (") "lit 10 8-111 "' .. .... .. .. ~ <0 V ~ v ~ ~ .. .... .. ~ ~ .. "' .... M ~ ~ ~ " " "' 1 1i5 c o -' ;:! o .... .., .... :s :E >< w CD <:> <:> N oF ~ ~ G> '" E G> U G> C >: .. ~." C l!! N :> !!~ '" ... .. u I- C .. co. :> u u o ." C .. ~ G> ~ C ~ :> I- E u ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <> ... '" '" .., '" .., '" :t '" <> .., '" N "' "- .., '" N ... a. u "' ... "' "- ~ "' "' ~ .., - ~ ~ N ... '" .., <> 0 I I <> ~ .;; I [I ... ... ~ ;:: '" N I ~ ~ ;:: '" ... "' '" ;:: ... '" '" ;:: ~ .. U .., ... ~ ~ <> U N ... <>' 0 I <>' "'I .. I i & u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ '" '" .., N "' N <> ~ .., ... <> "' "- .., ... '" '" ... <> '" U '" "- .. .., .., .., "' "- "' "- ~ .., '" ... ... '" "- '" N ... 0 <> I <> ~ '" I , . '" i E "- "- '" "' ... "- ... N "- N :j: M N ~ N ~ "' ~ N U ~ ~ "' .., .., "' ~ ~ ~ "- a. u N I .. <> 0 I <> on .. E u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "' '" "' '" <> .., '" .., '" .., <> '" '" ... ;;; ... .., ;;; "- .., a. u "- '" <> '" ~ "- '" "' "- '" ~ N "- "- '" '" "' "' <> 0 ~ <> ... on , I <> '" E "' '" '" "- ;:: ';! "- '" N "' ... '" "- N .., .., lSl "- u ~ ~ '" ... '" N "' N .., ~ ~ N a. U ~ .. <> 0 <> ;.; .. E u ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "' "- N ... "' <> .., ~ '" '" <> .., '" "- '" '" ;g ;l; "' ... a. u "- "' '" "- "' <> '" "- "' '" ~ .., "- '" "' '" "- "' <> 0 ~ <> ... I I ;.; E "' "'l~ ~ "' N "' N ';! <> :j: ~ '" '" "' <> '" "' :t N U N ~ "' N "- ~ ... ~ ... a. u N .. <> 0 9- .. I ~ E ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u '" ... N ;! N "' "' ;l; '" '" <> :t '" N '" '" '" '" "' '" a. u '" ... '" '" '" "- "- "- ~ "- '" "- "' "- '" '" "' <> 0 i 9- ... I ~ , E "- ... ~ ';! '" ~ "' "' ~ "' ... "' "' "' N ... ;:: ~ "' ... .. U ~ N "' ... "' N "- .., ... <> <> U N "- 9- 0 ~ .. ~ E u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ '" ... ;::: '" "' .., .., '" ... <> ;;; <> ~ '" N .., .., '" "- ;;; .. U .., ... '" "' "- '" "' ... '" ... "' "' "' '" I "' '" <> 0 9- ... ~ ~ , , .., ... ,~ .., "' ';! , "' <> N .., "- '" ... .., ~ .M ~ ;:: "- N E u ~ ~ ~ "' N "' "' ... ;'0 .. U N <> 0 <> .. .;; '" '" " ~ ;:: N '" " "- <> ... "' .., C; "- '" ~ ';! ;:r; ~ N N "- ... ... .., N "' .. '" ~ .!!1 ~ 0; Iii .. 0 Ii; ~ e ~ e e ;; Ii; " .!l E * ;; " .!l .!l Ii; ~ ;; ~ E E " " ;; , "' E E ~ E E e ! ... ~ C ~ .E "' .E ~ ~ E ~ >- "' .2 ~ '" "' "' .E I ... ... '" '5 " f!! 0. '0 ,. ~ ... u ! ~ ~ 0; E -' 2 '0 ~ ~ ;:: ;:: a. 0 .!l '" '" <l. '" "- "' ... '0 .., .., N - <( '" u -' 0 '0 " " '5 '5 '5 '5 '5 '5 0 '5 '5 '5 '5 ~ '5 '5 '5 '5 ;;: '5 C -' 0 ::; -' -' -' -' -' -' Z -' -' -' -' u. -' -' -' -' -' ~ 0( <l. :E c:; - ..J Z '" " ~ U <> :> o u 0 - .. ;:: ;:: ~ ~ .., ~ ~ <> :E CDU. - - ~ ~ ~ N N .., ... ... "' ~ ... ... 8-112 M - :c :E )( w CD 0 0 N .. - ~ .. ... E .. u .. C ,;; CO .., ... . l!! c N ::l .. .l: :is to- ... ~ U C CO Co ::l U U 0 ... C co ~ ~ 0 C ~ ::l to- E u 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. .... 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. .. ;! .. N ;! .... N '" .. '" "' ~ Cl. U N <C " '" .. N N .. " ~ .. 1/1. ,;; E .. <C '" '" "' .... ~ ~ '" '" ~ "' u ~ .. Cl. U .. " .. ;.: .. E u 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. " "' '" N <C '" N '" .. .. "' M Cl. u "' N <C '" '" ~ '" 5! "' N .. " .. 1/1. ;.: . E N '" ~ '" '" "' <C - '" ;! '" "' U N ~ ~ ~ .. Cl. U ~ .. " .. on .. E u 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. 1/1. '" '" " ;;; .... .... <C .. .. <C .... '" Cl. U '" .... " <C N " 5! 5! " " "' .. " .. " on . E ~ '" ~ .... " " " '" '" ~ "' '" u '" ~ N N N .. Cl. U ~ .. " .. ;.; .. E u .... .... 1/1. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... "' .... '" ~ N '" .. .. .. .... .... U; Cl. U " "' '" .... " '" <C 5! .. "' " .. " ~ .. " ;.; . E N " <C "' "' "' M '" '" ~ "' "' U N N ~ ~ - N ... Cl. U ~ .. " '? .. ~ E .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 1/1. 1/1. u .... ;!; '" <C '" '" '" .. .. .... '" N Cl. U '" " .... - '" .... .. .. "' " "' .. " ~ ~ '? .... ~ . E ~ .... .. ~ .... "' :;: '" '" ~ '" .. m u N N N ... .. U ~ '? " ~ .. ~ E u 1/1. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 1/1. '" "' u; N .... '" '" .. '" .. .. "' m u " "' "' ~ ~ <C .. '" "' " " .. " ~ '? .... ~ ~ E N '" N ;: <C N '" '" ~ ;! ~ .. U N '" N "' m u ~ .. " co .. ,;; !!J '" N :;: N <C "' N '" '" '" '" '" ;;; " " '" ~ "' N "' " Iii '" .. " ~ ~ C :E ;;; E > '-' 8 'C "- I U '-' :;; ~ '> ::5 1D ~ ~ u. ~ 'C ~ $ !!:. c <3 m m '" $ c m 2 "0 ~ m 0 u > > -' ~ 0 ;;; > > " a c f- 'C 'C "0 m ., '-' ~ 'C ! '" " "- "- .c ~ 0 "- "- '5 '" f,! -' c -' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >- >- 0 '" :0 ~ J!l 'C 'C .!l .!l ~ " '" " .c 0 ~ '" ~ << , ::; << << " "- '-' .... -' '" - -' ~ ~ ~ g U" .2", ;: ;: ~ ~ " 1Ilu. ~ N N " " <C <C f- ~5 -$;;:; .9o~ 8-113 l") - :c :E >< w '" ~ ... - N ... "'- "'- 'if'. 0 0 E u 0 ... 0> Q. u '" '" ~ 0 0 0 '" .;; 0 , E '" CO CO ... 0 CO Q. u N ... 0 U 0 0 ;.:. .. "'- "'- 'if'. 0 0 E u <0 CX) ;;; u '" ... Q. 0 0 0 'if'. ;.:. . E N N CO CO .... 0 Q. u N CO ~ 0 U 0 0 ,;; .. "'- "'- "'- 0 0 0 E u '" '" '" U <0 '" '" Q. 0 0 0 '" ,;; 0 , E .., .... .., N N CO Q. U .., CD ~ 0 U 0 0 ;.; .. "'- "'- "'- 0 0 0 E u '" ;g LO u '" Q. 0 0 0 '" ;.; 0 , E CO N CO CD ... .... Q. U N CD ~ 0 u '? 0 ~ .. '" "'- '" E 0 0 0 U <0 0> N Q. U '" '" '" 0 0 '? '" ~ . , E ~ ... '" .. u co 0 .... N .... ~ 0 u '? 0 ~ .. ~ "'- "'- "'- E 0 0 0 u LO ~ '" .. U '" ... 0 0 '? '" ~ 0 ~ , CD N CD E CO ~ CO .. U N CD ~ U 0 0 0 .. .;; 0 ~ .., .. !!l 0 '" ... Oi CO ~ .., Oi ~ "0 Iii f- - Oi CI> c: l!! Q. S 0 - "u "" Ul "" .. Q. C: > "" ::l "" U 0 ::E Co .. ..J ..J ..J Gl c( ~ c( C f- f- 0 0 0 f- f- f- ~ C N Gl j5 III I- .5 III >- :;: g III III 3Cl. .c :l U g ...0 O-c ~c ._ III U .. Gl > o c .. :l I- "'- 0 '" '" 0> ~ .... "'- 0 .... ... 0> '" 0> '" 0 <0 '" '" '" ~ ~ "'- 0 '" '" N CX) 0 ~ "'- 0 .... '" ... <0 ~ ~ "'- 0 0 '" ... N 0 ~ ... '" 0 N >. .. "C ~ .E j! 0 f- 8-114 'Ot - :s :EO >< w CD <> <> N .,; ~ ~ '" .Q E '" " '" c :>: ~ .. w'C N 'C ","- :g~ ~ i Q. " " " o 'C l: .. ~ ~ l: ~ " I- :1 * * * * * ?ft.1:-fl * * * * * * * * * * * *'* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *'* * u '" N N '" " '" 0 '" N 0 '" 0 '" 0 '" 0 '" '" 0 0 0 '" 0 ;!: 0 0 '" '" " '" " '" '" ;; N '" '" U '" '" N '" '" '" 0 ~ '" " '" '" 0 " 0 ~ '" ;:: " " '" '" ... '" '" '" '" N ~ '" '" '" '" '" 0 ~ ~ ~ '" .. . E '" '" 10'..... ;;; '" '" ... ;:: " ~ ... ;!: 0 ""'" N '" ;:: '" '" 0 N '" ... " '" ;:: '" '" '" '" '" " '" '" .. U N ~ ~ N N N N Q. u .. 0 0 0 ;.; .. , E u * * * * * * * c#!1~ *1* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * '" '" 0 0 18 '" ;1; '" '" o 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 '" 0 '" 0 " '" '" 0 '" a> ~ '" '" '" ;; :g Q. u N '" '" '" '" ~ o 0 a> " N '" " '" " '" 0 '" '" N " '" a> '" '" '" " " '" '" 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 .. ;.; 1 . E '" ~ " 0 ~ ~ '" '" '" ,,' '" '" '" '" N '" 0 '" " '" '" ;:: N '" " '" '" ;:: "" " ;!: " '" '" ~ " N U N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ .. Q. u N 0 0 C> on .. 1 E: u * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *' * * * * * *j'#. * '" 0 " " '" '" ~ '" '" 0 '" 0 0 '" 0 '" 0 '" 0 0 " '" 0 ~ 0 " 0 0 '" ~ '" '" '" '" M!~ a> Q. U " '" '" '" '" '" '" '" N 0 " '" 0 '" a> '" '" '" '" ... 0> 0> '" '" '" .. " N '" '" 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 .. on E 0> '" '" N 0>10 '" ... "'I" ;!: ... '" '" 0 '" 0 '" '" '" N ~ 0 "'I'" 0> '" ~ ~I" ~ ~ N '" '" N '" U ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ N ~ .. Q. U I I N C> 0 0' I I ;.; .. I ~I~'~ * '$.1*' * * *1* * * * * * * * * * * * * * .. * * * ;;e! * * * * * '" *' * * E u . 0 a> '" '" 0 "',~ '" 0 N 0 '" " 0 0 0 0 " N 0 N 0 " 0 ",' " '" ;1; '" " '" " ;; ... Q. U '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 ~ " '" '" '" N " '" '" '" '" '" ... ;!: '" '" 0 0> '" '" a> '" '" " '" 0 0 ~ N N 0 ... C<?I 11 U 0 ~ ;!: 0 '" " 0 '" ... '" a> N N '" "'I'" 0 '" '" '" N 0 " " '" N N 0> ~, ;:: '" ~ ... " " " ... ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ - N Q. U I .. o 0 '?I"*' I ~, [I * * * * * * * * * *1* * * * * ?ft.1"$. *1*'* * * * * * * * '#.i'$. * * *1* * * * * u '" '" '" 0 '" '" ... 0 '" '" '" 0 0 '" '" 0 '" 0 '" 0 ;; 0 0 '" '" '" '" ... l81l1l '" N '" 0 u " '" '" '" '" '" 0 '" '" '" ... 0 '" " 0 ij31~1~ 0 '" '" '" '" '" a> '" ... '" '" '" '" '" 010 ~ I ~ ~ ~ '?.-;fl. ":"! E' '" ;!: '" 0 '''' " " '" " <<:II~;N ~ '" '" '" ~ ... iO,1l) '" ;:: 'N 0> '" ~ N " ~ '" " N N ~ '" 0> '" " u ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 u .. <;! 0 , ~ .. ~ I E * *1* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *1* ~I~ * <J?.i<ft, * * * * * * * * * * u 0 a> 0 0 '" a> :; 0 " 0 ~ 0'0 " '" 0 '" '" 0 0 [OI~ 0 0'''' 0 '" a> '" .....iOl " N 0 '" " u '" ... " '" '" 0 '" " "'I" N 0 '" '" a> N N '" "'I'" " N '" '" "IN ... '" " '" 0 0 ~ ~ <;! .. I ~ ~ , '" ~ ~ 0 ~ ;!: "I'" ;!: " ;!: '" ~ ~ ~ '" ~ '" '" '" N '" ~ '" '" '" N ;!: " '" '" 0 N a> a> " .. E u ~ ~ ~ ... " U N 0 0 0 .. .. I ~ '" '" '" N ~ ~I'" ~ " ~ '" ~ ~ '" '" ~ '" " '" '" ~I'" N ,,, liT 010 ~ ~ ;!: " ~ ~ ~ '" !!! N N '" N N N:'" 0 '" "iij I I Iii .. , "C e , I 2 ! I " U I " U e ~ e E 2 " " " 2 c u e e ~ ~ e " " 'E E u 2 i!l I " c i!l ;; " E 6 0 ;; " " " E .E .E .E .E E E Q. ~ '" c ~ Q. 6 6 6 6 "C .. " " ~ ..; 6 e " :! "C " "C Ii; ~ ~ e " " 'i' e " E e .~ -!! " ;; N " " " " u e e .. " " 2 " " " * e " " " " '" " .. c " c c c ;; " " e e e 0 e e " 0 ;; e 0 " e " e " " E e " e " " " E ;; ;; c " ~ ;; '? E '" e E E e "iij ..; .E .E .E .E ,2 .E 2 2 E 2 c{ 2 2 E ~ 2 ~ " "C " C " .E ~ 2 'i' " Ii; 0 E E E ~ ;; ;; c 2 N ;; N N N :9- N U U " ~ " u 0 ~ 0 " ..; ;; :::> :::> il N " ;; c 0 0 - E E " E E E ~ c E ~ E to E E " " E - - E - E '" t; '~ '0 c '" '" E ~I" " '0 '0 c c 1;; " 0 N N 0 0 0 .E ~ .E .E .E .E .E .E .E .E 1; E ..; ..; 2 c ';; .E ~ ..; 1; .E .E l! u x x N ~ 'P! 'i' .E " " x x ~ x x x ~ 11 " 'E ?l 'E ~ ~ c ~ u 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E N N " N N N N ~ N '" N N :::> N '" N '" E ~ a: N N N "i III c - 0 ", '" .... 11, <D <D Cl " " " ;!: III u , u <( <D Cl Cl <D Cl Cl " <D Cl " <D Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c " <D " <D Cl " Cl " <( <D Cl " <( " @I~ <( <D 0 " " " ;:: ;:: N ~ ~ '" '" " 0 0 0 0 0 0"- ~ ~ N N N '" '" '" ,'" '" '" '" '" 0> '" ~ ~ - - N N '" '" '" I- 8-115 ... .. :is :E )( w '" c:> c:> N on - ~ .. .c E .. " .. Q ,.;; N .. W"CI N'l: ..... :;;>- .. " I- Ii r:l. " " " o "CI c: .. ~ .. > o E " I- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- E " '" <0 ~ '" .. ;; '" <0 .. .. .. ;;; '" ;: ~ ~ ;! '" N '" " '" '" '" ~ N ~ .. ~ ~ '" '" ~ ~ ... ... 0 ~ .. .. .. .. E ~ '" '" I ~ ;: '" N '" ~ .. ... N '" .. .. N N N ~ '" ~ N ~ ... .. N ~ ~ ... ~ .. ... " i N <0 .. " .. 0 I ;:. .. #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- E " '" '" ~ ~ N '" ... '" <0 .. ~ ... ... ~ '" ~ .. ~ '" ... " ~ N ... '" '" N <0 ~ .. N '" '" <0 '" '" ~ '" 0 ~ .. .. .. ;:. I E <0 - '" '" N ~ '" ... I ~ '" ::j: <0 ;;; ;;; ~ '" '" ~ ... .. - '" ~ '" ~ ... " ... .. " .. 0 ,;; .. #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- E " '" - N '" '" '" '" N .. ... '" N '" '" '" '" ... .. ;; ~ ... " ~ '" <0 ... ~ <0 - '" ~ '" '" '" <0 '" ~ <0 .. ... 0 - .. .. .. ,;; E <0 - ;! ~ '" ~ '" N '" N ;; ... '" ~ ... <0 '" ~ N '" '" .. ~ '" N ... N .. ... " N .. .. " .. 0 ;.; .. I , #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- I #- #- E " '" '" ... ;1; 0; '" '" '" '" <0 '" '" ~ <0 ... <0 ... .. ... N ... " '" '" '" '" <0 '" '" ~ I '" '" <0 ~ ~ '" <0 ~ '" '" .. 0 .. .. ;.; I I . E ~ '" <0 ~ .. N '" <0 '" '" ;; '" N '" .. <; '" ~ '" ~ - - '" N N <0 N N .. ... " .. .. " I ~ 0 ~ .. I [I #- #- #- I #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- " '" '" .. I '" N ~ .. N ill .. .. ;;; '" ~ '" <0 <0 .. ~ N " ~ '" .. '" '" '" .. '" '" ~ ... ~ '" <0 '" ~ <0 '" .. 0 ~ - ~ .. ~ E <0 '" ~ ~ '" .. '" ;! '" <0 ::j: '" <0 .. ~ '" ~ ~ <0 '" .. " ~ - N I - '" ~ - ~ '" '" ;;; .. " ~ 0 I - .. i - #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- I #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- #- E " '" ~ ~ ;1; '" .. .. ~ I <0 '" '" '" ~ '" '" '" ;: '" '" ~ .. " <0 <0 ~ ~ .. .. '" '" <0 N '" '" '" <0 <0 ... .. 0 - - - ~ ,. - . - , '" <0 ~ ~ '" N '" '" '" '" .. '" '" .. '" ;;; .. ~ '" .. E N - - <0 '" ~ '" N ~ - '" .. .. " - .. " .. 0 .. .. .. '" '" ~ '" ;: N I '" ~ ~ .. ... '" '" 0; ~ '" ;! ~ tii - '" - ~ N ~ N ~ ... ... '" N '" .. <0 ~ <ii ~ Iii .. i I e e 2 e ~ m m " 2 2 ~ ~ E " " ;; ~ ~ " >- ;; E E ;; ;; 2 '" E E E E " ... -" ~ .E E e ~ '" c <( ~ '" .E .E ~ >- ... .Q '" 6 6 ~ 0 -" ... 6 '" f!! 15. " ... ... " <( ~ 1i ~ ...J ~ '8 .. .. ;: ;: -6 ... 0 2 ~ ~ '" '" Q. <0 ~ '" ... '" '" N - ::i: '" U ...J m " ...J .3 " 0 0 0 j 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 'E <( ::; ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J Z ...J ...J ...J ...J "- ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ~ 0. :Ii U ~ !IJ .. ...J Z - - - - - N N '" ... ... '" ;: ;: N ~ '" '" '" .. ;:! o .. - - - ~ ... " 1iS"- 0 :Ii .... 8-116 ~ .. :.a :E >< w CD o o N on .... ~ '" .Q E '" " '" c ,.:; ... .. w" ('Ill 'C ",LL :0>- .. " I- li Q. '" " " o " c .. ~ '" ~ c ~ '" I- E " '$ '$ '$ I '$ '$ '$ '$ '$ '$ '$ .. .. N '" .... ... '" '" N .... .. N oo '" Q. " N N N '" '" .. '" N ~ .. 0 ~ .. '$ .;; e! ~ ~ :: oo N oo ~ N '" I '" '" ... " ~ .. il " 0 .. ~ " .. '$ .. .. .. .. '$ '$ '$ .. '$ '$ ... '" .... '" .. .. ~ .... .. .... oo .. " '" '" '" N '" ;! oo N '" .. 0 .. '$ ;..: , E N '" oo .... '" '" ;! N '" ~ '" ... " N ~ - .. Q. " ~ .. 0 .. on .. E " '$ '$ .. '$ '$ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" '" '" .. '" '" .. .. .. ;g '" '" Q. " '" .... ... '" - ... .. .. ~ ... .. 0 ~ - .. '$ on E ~ N '" '" N N oo '" '" ~ .. .. " '" ~ ~ N ~ : Q. " .. 0 .. ;.; .. E " '$ .. .. '$ '$ '$ '$ '$ '$ '$ '$ .. :;: .. '" ;;; : '" .... '" .. '" .. N Q. " oo oo '" .... '" ;! .... ... oo .. 0 .. ... ;.; E .. ~ ... .... I oo oo .. - '" N N .. " N N N ~ ... N ... Q. ~ " I .. 0 ~I .. i , E .. .. .. '$ .. .. .. .. .. '$ .. .. " :;: ;::: u; '" .. .. .. .. .. ... oo .. Q. " .. ;! ;! oo oo oo .. 0 '? '" ~ . E .. .. oo ~ '" .. '" .. '" oo '" .. G " N '" N oo ~ N .. .. " ~ '? 0 ~ .. I ~ I E " '$ .. .. .. .. .. '$ .. .. .. .. .. '" N ... ~ '" .. '" .. .... '" oo .. G " '" oo oo '" '" N .... '" ... ... oo .. 0 '? '" ~ . ~ E ~ N N ~ ~ '" .. .. N '" ... ... " N N '" - N ... G " ~ .. 0 .. .. .;; I 0 '" I N :;: ~ '" ~ I N '" '" '" '" ... 0; ... ... N '" oo N oo ... Iii I ... .. I 'C ~ ~ c I :E ~ E S 'c u 8 a. :I: G " U l;; :e .:: :5 .. 2 2 "- ~ " ~ ~ ~ 13 '" C C 2 G .. <5 1;; " 1i 1i "Ii .Q " .~ .~ -' ~ 0; > > 0. C f- a: a: <5 .. .c U 'C 'C ! '" ~ 0 a. a. 'C .. " ~ -' C -' ~ " ,., '" ,., ,., ~ ,., ,., 0 .., 'U .., ~ ~ :l " 'c .., .., "Ii ~ .. ~ '" ~ 0 " G <( <( 0 <( a. <( u -' '" ::; 0 ! - -' ~ 1! 8 . >" .Q .. ~ :: ~ ~ 0 0 OJ"- ~ N N ... ... '" '" ~ f- c,C - .~~ I ..:lo~ , 8-117 "'" - :s .c >< w E "$I. .... "$I. u 0 0 ... u "' '" '" CD ... ~ 0 0 0 "$I. .;; . . E CO CO ... U N 0 CO ... U .... CO 0 0 0 .. i-: E "$I. "$I. "$I. u . . . ... u CD '" 0 0 "' '" '" 0 0 "$I. i-: . , E N 0 .... U CO ... 0 ... U N ... ~ 0 0 0 .. oil E "$I. "$I. "$I. u . . . ... u co ... '" 0 "' ... ... 0 0 .... oil , E co co co u Cl> co ... ... U N co ~ 0 0 0 .. ;.; E "$I. "$I. "$I. u . . . ... u ... N N 0 CD "' "' 0 0 "$I. ;.; . , E ... ~ Cl> U N N ... ... U .... CO ~ 0 0 ~ .. ~ E "$I. "$I. "$I. u . . 0 ... u 0 N <Xl 0 0 CD "' "' ~ "$I. ~ . , E CO CO Cl> .. U 0 ~ Cl> U .... CO ~ 0 0 ~ ~ .. ~ E "$I. "$I. "$I. u 0 0 0 .. u ;;Ii ... 0 0 0 ... "' ~ "$I. ~ . ~ . .... co .... E u ... co ... .. U N co ~ 0 0 0 .. .;; .. CO ~ .... ro .!!! 0 Cl> ... CO ~ .... "5 ro ~ f- U5 " - ~ 0 " a f .!l - u "5 "l "2 .. > <A " ::l "" " 0 :E D.. 0 -' -' -' ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 .... .... .... '" Q - II) .... N .... J!l ..,. III >- :> u w C N ..!!! l'll Gl Co :I :I :is .c u l'll U u I- - 0 0 "1:J ~ C l'll (3 ... Gl > 0 c ... :I I- "$I. 0 ... ... 0 0 '" "$I. 0 N ... "' "' <Xl "$I. 0 '" ... '" '" '" "$I. 0 "' "' ... N ~ ~ "$I. 0 "' "' N N ~ ~ "$I. . '" ... 0 0 ~ N ... 0 N >- .. " ~ .E ii - 0 .... 8-118 10 :t: .c ~ e! '" U o ~.c "'- g E e-w _0. o J! '5 j.... >8 ...g~ c;: 8. ~ :C::J~ ~uc 8~ :t: III E'" ~ o .2l (j; 5~ C :J '" C .c '" -.c 0.... C . u~ :;2 C .~ 8. :J ~g o '" o Ol '" 0 ~~ ~ ~ >- 8.~g ~ =' 8. ~ ~ 1] .c~g C 0>_ 2 <G"E '0 :J'" _ 0 & '" >- .0 0 0 E l: '" E Q) 8> OeDe o~Q) __0 Q) 0 (j) .c C 0. -:: .Q Q) .20:6 ~ C ~ u'- '" o .0 > 'ifi 50> o.ou c CD.~ g,f% o ui 0 2: _ 0 '" '" 0 .0]216 o ,g 0 ~ 'E ~ .c_'" ~ ~ I: '" 150..0 .:<! c E "'5"02 ~ c ~ 0 c '" 'E- :g =' Q)~ 2~ 0.- >0 ~.c- ~dl~ J:i "c.. 00. _0 :J o E ~ g 8 .:<! >'1 .~ '" ... '" g 0) ~ 0 o 0 (j; 0 ~ , U) 8E Z'" .:<! >'1 .~ '" ... g. g"#. g .;; 0 OJ ,. ~ o > o c 8. :J o g - 'E ~ '" Ol o ~ o ~ u c o :2 .!.! ]5 :J 0. .c o 5l c.:? g~ .:<! >'1 .~ '" ... g. o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 , ~ c- ~~ .:<! E ... .:<! ~~ &. g o kO 0 '?: ~..... 0 o ~ ~ o > o c 8. :J o g '" Ol 2 !!i o '" =' 16 '2 ~ '" '" ]5 i2 c..:! ~~ .:<! ~ .~ '" ... g o~g .., 0:. 0 , ~ c- ~~ .:<! E ... ~ E ... .:<! E ... ?f'. "1 ..... '" >!! o .., .r 00 00 .., ?f'. - ..; '" ?f'. o c:i o ~ o .., >!! o o c:i '" >!! o 0> .0 ..... 00 '" >!! o ... .r ... ?f'. '" 0: .., '" ... >!! o o c:i .., ?f'. 0> .0 ..... ..... ?f'. o c:i .., >!! o ..... .0 .., ... .., >!! o 00 ..; '" >!! o o c:i ..... .., '" >!! o .., .0 '" ?f'. .., ..; .., ... - '" >!! o o c:i .., ?f'. ..... .0 .., ... .., ?f'. ~ .., >!! o .., ..; .., .., - ?f'. o .0 - >!! o 0> .0 ..... '" ... 00 ?f'. "! ... - >!! o 0> .0 ..... .., ... ..... ?f'. "l .., - >!! o o c:i 00 '" ... ..... ?f'. o c:i '" >!! o '" 0: .., .., .., 0> ?f'. ... ori >!! o o c:i 00 ... ... ?f'. 00 ori ~ >!! o '" c:i 0> '" .., .., ?f'. '" .., - >!! o '" c:i 0> .., .., '" ?f'. '" '" - >!! o ~ ..... 0> .., .., '" >!! o ..... .0 >!! o ..... ori 00 o .., .., ?f'. ~ ..... ~ ?f'. "1 .., 00 0> '" >!! o "1 .., .., ?f'. '" .0 ... 00 ... >!! o ..... .0 '" ?f'. ..... ..... '" ... ?f'. ~ 00 '" >!! o 00 ..; '" o ~ ... >!! o "l 00 .., >!! o o c:i ..., 00 '" >!! o o c:i '" >!! o 00 c:i .., ... ?f'. ~ 00 '" >!! o '" ..... 0> ..., '" o ~ >!! o 0> N '" >!! o '" ..... 0> ..... '" 00 >!! o '" '" '" ?f'. o c:i o - 00 '" 00 >!! o .., ..; .., ?f'. ": 0: '" '" >!! o '" ori .., >!! o .0 00 o '" >!! o ~ '" .., ?f'. "l 00 00 .., ..., ~ >!! o '" .0 '" >!! o '" .r 0> .., .., .., ~ ?f'. "! ... >!! o o ori ..... .., '" .., ~ >!! o .., ..; .., >!! o '" .0 00 o .., '" >!! o .., ..; .., >!! o 00 0> ... .., >!! o o c:i .., ?f'. o c:i o - ... - .., >!! o '" '" '" >!! o o c:i 0> ... ... >!! o 00 ..; '" >!! o o ori o .., '" >!! o ... .0 .., ?f'. o c:i ~ ~ ... ~ 00 >!! o ~ 00 .., ?f'. o ori o - .., - .:<! E ... ~U) ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N 0 ~ cO> ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N - :I: g 60. ~ '" .., s .., '" .., '" S cP..1~' 00 .., ... .., o ~ - - ..... S ..... 00 o ~ 00 0> o ~ ?f'. o c:i 00 >!! o ~ 00 '" '" 00 >!! o o c:i 00 >!! o ~ 00 '" '" 00 >!! o 0: 00 00 >!! o 0: '" ..., 00 >!! o ..... '" ..... >!! o ..... .r .., .., 00 >!! o ~ - 00 >!! o ..... .r .., '" 0> o s >!! o o c:i '" >!! o "l 00 '" >!! o ~ ..... ..... ?f'. .., c:i 00 ..... .., 00 ~ ..... .., ..... ?f'. o c:i '" ?f'. '" .r '" >!! o 0: 00 00 ?f'. - ..; 00 00 o o '" 00 '" .., >!! o o c:i ..., >!! o ~ .0 '" ?f'. ..... .0 .., ?f'. .., 0: ..... .., ..... 00 - .., .., .., >!! o .., ..; '" ?f'. ~ N .., ?f'. .., ..; 00 ?f'. 00 ..... ..... 0> .., ~ 00 o 00 ?f'. o c:i '" ?f'. '" ~ .., ?f'. ..... .0 .., ?f'. -0: 00 ..... .., '" ..... .., 00 ..... 00 ~ 0> .., ~-g- o 0 :9 k'!i ;Q I/) :t: .c ;B II ;~ ~g ... ~N c: - ~ 8.~ :C::J~ ~8~ :t: CD e'" - I. ~ Ql "0 00 Ql.c 0.- RE o Ql _ 0. 0_ _ 0 Ql - .0 Ql ~~ " " Ql " .c Ql ;.= " 'g (j .5 ~ " R " ~8 o Ql C 0> Ql.e o " - Ql W 2 . o Ql >- Ro.g o ~ R - - " 5 lG 0 "'i'." g " 0>_ A! Q) "e 'Q.2(i) _ c 0. Ql >- .0 0 0 E ~ Ql E Q) 8> c;lG"E cs:EW __0 CD 0 Q) .c " 0. ::.QQ) .Q"5:E o " 0 ~ ~.~ Ql 0 0> 0.0"0 C Ql.!!:! O.co. ;o:::1-:::l C 0 ~ ~ g .00 ill o .c 0 " - R o E 0 ~ ~ ~ - , .8 ~ g E '5"O:J o " " ~ c '6 0)=0 :EE- (D~ ~ Co- B~.S! o "0 ~~~ .ga.8. - " E Ql 8 0 ~ 0 (.) .:!! ~~ Ql 0.. Ql g g f! 8 - 0 .$ ~'0 ,,- Q E ;::0.. g g ~ 8 .;; 0 a; ~ o C >- o " C 0. " o g cJ!! g,E - 'E ~ Ql 0> C ~ C Ql =' "0 " C :2 .2 :0 " 0. .c o ~ '0 >- o " C 0. " o g Ql 0> C ~ Ql =' o .S! ~ 1;; ~ "' Ql :0 fl. g ~ ~ 8 - 0 eJe g,E g o ,e 00 9 ,. o C.:!! Q E ;::0.. g o ~ 8 '" 0: 0 , 0 ,,- Q E ;:: 0.. g ill :I: g 60. - '" .:!! E 0.. .:!! I!~ Ql 0.. .:!! E 0.. .:!! I! .~ Ql 0.. .:!! E 0.. .:!! I! .~ &. o E 0.. .:!! I! .~ Ql 0.. .:!! E 0.. ?!'- ~ .... '" ?!'- '" -<i oo oo '" ?!'- - ..; '" ?!'- o ci o - o - '" :.!1 o o ci '" ?!'- .,. .0 .... oo '" :.!1 o ... -<i ... ?!'- '" 0: '" "' ... ?!'- o ci '" :.!1 o .,. .0 .... .... '" '" - - 15 ~ :.!1 o o ci '" :.!1 o .... .0 '" ... '" :.!1 o '" ..; '" :.!1 o o ci .... '" - "' :.!1 o '" .0 '" :.!1 o ~ '" '" ... "' ?!'- o ci '" ?!'- .... .0 '" ... - '" ?!'- ~ - '" ?!'- '" ..; '" '" - '" o '" '" s ?!'- o .0 - :.!1 o .,. .0 .... '" ... '" ?!'- ~ ... - :.!1 o .,. .0 .... '" ... .... ?!'- "l '" - ?!'- o ci oo "' ... .... :.!1 o o ci '" ?!'- '" 0: '" '" '" .,. ?!'- ... .,; - :.!1 o o ci '" ... ... '" "' '" '" "' S "9. :.!1 o oo .,; "g o "' ci .,. '" '" '" ?!'- "! '" - "g o "' ci .,. '" '" "' ?!'- "! '" - "g o ~ .... .,. '" '" "' "g o .... .0 "g o .... .,; '" o '" '" ?!'- - ....: - ?!'- '" ..; '" .,. '" '" '" ... ?!'- '" '" '" ?!'- '" .0 ... '" ... ?!'- .... .0 '" "g o .... ....: "' ... ?!'- ~ oo '" ?!'- '" ..; "' o - ... :.!1 o "l '" '" :.!1 o o ci "' oo "' "g o o ci "' :.!1 o '" ci '" ... ... '" '" '" .... "0 ",-0 ?!'- ~ '" '" ?!'- "! .... .,. "' '" o - ?!'- ~ '" '" "g o '" ....: .,. .... '" '" "g o "! '" '" "g o o ci o oo '" '" "g o '" ..; '" ?!'- .... 0: '" '" "g o "' .,; '" "g o .0 oo o '" - - '" '" ?!'- ~ '" '" "g o "l oo oo - '" "' ?!'- "' .0 '" "g o '" -<i 0. '" '" '" - ?!'- ~ :;:; :.!1 o o .,; .... '" '" '" "g o '" ..; '" "g o "' .0 oo o '" "' :.!1 o '" ..; '" :.!1 o oo .,. ... '" .... '" "' oo 15 ~ "g o o ci '" ?!'- o ci o - ... - '" "g o "! '" '" ?!'- o ci 0. ... ... ?!'- oo ..; '" "g o o .,; o '" - "' "g o ... .0 '" "g o o ci ... - oo "g o - oo '" :.!1 o o .,; o '" - oo o '" .,. s ?!'- o ci '" :.!1 o ~ oo "' '" oo "g o o ci oo "g o ~ oo "' '" oo ?!'- ~ oo oo "g o ~ '" "' oo "g o .... N .... :.!1 o .... -<i '" '" oo "g o ~ - oo "g o .... -<i '" '" .,. .... o s ?!'- o ci "' "g o "l oo '" "g o ~ .... .... :.!1 o '" ci oo .... '" oo - .... '" .... ?!'- o ci "' "g o "' -<i '" "g o ~ oo oo ?!'- - ..; oo oo o o '" oo "' '" ?!'- o ci "' ?!'- - .0 '" ?!'- .... .0 '" "g o '" 0: .... '" .... oo - '" '" '" "g o '" ..; "' ?!'- - N '" "g o '" ..; oo ?!'- - oo .... .... .,. '" - oo o oo "g o o ci "' ?!'- "! - '" "g o .... .0 '" ?!'- "': oo .... '" '" .... - '" oo .... oo 0. - '" -tg - C C 151... '0 ~ "" 0- ... ii ~ t ~ -g ~ u~ N~ ~i! l}.f 1: ~ o i D i o >- >< .. = c 3: -li,g ~ ~ ~ 5 i?i > ~ a. Iriil ~ /!c Cl: ~ ~ 2d. (J ,..0 ~88 L o g j! .g z ::; >< ~ " u ...j~ ::; o . ~U o u = < ~= 15.J.! ~~ <a-: i!: .2..\,/: i -0 &-m >- .... ~ 0 eo .. o .. ~ o " '" c o ~ = 2 o = U * c o E E o U " c ~ ; ~ c e o II & E o ~ o ::; ,g . ~ . ~ J!1 o ::; >< ~ j; . ~ . J.! o 2 = I ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ u c ~ . o u c o E ~ 'i 'i ~ N ~ N ~ ., ~ ., 'i ~ ., = ~ = ~ = ~ ~ ~ o N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ;; ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ ~ Oi ~ Oi ~ 0: = g N ~ g N ~ '1' ~ '1' ~ '1' N ~ .,. '? N ~ N N ~ N N ~ g :'l ~ = g = ~ ~ = ;; 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj = ~ o ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj ~ ~ ~ o o Ii o o o o o N 8 '" o o o o ;:: N Oi N Oi o 000 000 000 000 = N N ~ N ~ 0 o' r.: = o o o ~ ..: o 0 0 0 N ~ ~ o N ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ..; ...; o ~ ~ ~. 0 o N ~ ~ ::; In_ ~ ~ ~ ,..: ::: ,..: N ..; ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj ~ ~ oj . ~ >- - 8 N ~ = '" o o ~ = = '" ~ ~ ..; N = = = 0 '" ~ ~ N ~ 8 :0 to .,; 0: o .; 0 N N ~ ~ g :e o o o :e ~ o o ~ $ 'i g ~ ~ ~_ 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 ~ = :;: ~_ 0 '" - o o ~ '" o o o N = N ~ - :e ;;; ~ ;;; ;;; o o o ~ ~ o '" o 0 o o o = ~ ~ .; o N =. - ~ ~ ~ o o o N ~ ~ ..: ~ o o o o o o o o o o ~ N o o o o o o o o o N ~ = o :'l ~ ~ l!I 0 ~ g & o o ~ 0 ;; ~ '" = ~ N N o o o o o o o o o o = ~ 0 0 ..: o ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 Ii) ~ 0 .<J ..: ~ N ~ ;!:! o ~ ~ 0 ..; o o o o N o .; 8 N. o o o o o g ~ 'i Ij ~ '? ~ ~ ~ ~ o N o ~ N Ii N \1 N 000 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o ~ o <"l_ 0 0 o g: o 0 ..; N ~ ~ o o ~. :0 o ~ ~ ~ 0 ..; o N N ~ ~ :D o ~ ~ ~ N = ~ ~ ~ N N ~ N o l/ ~ ~ 0 ~ It) ~ o o o ~ ~- : ::: ..; o :0 ~ ~ ~ :3 0: ijl <5 ~ ~ 0 N ~ ~ ~ 0 0: ..; ~ :3 ~ ~ ..; ..; N N N C! N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;; 0 ~ = .; = ~ ;:: 0 ..: o o o N ~ o ~ 8 21~ = = = ~ ~ ~ = ~ = ~ = o o o 000 '8 1l ~ N ..0 g 8 o o o o o o 8 ~ .; o o o o 8 8 5l ~ = ..0 ...; 0: ;:: o o o o N ~" ft:g -... ~Ii ~.Q ~... :D Sl~ ".2 - . :t.i .~ - - ~~ "'..2 ~... ~ . ~ = ~ 0 NI~ - . = = _ 0 ",,, ,. :Dj; ... = ~ ~ ~ = ~o ('\1--:;; o = ~ "' Oi o o 0 ~ ~ "" ~ o 0 \1 o g o 0 o o 0 ~ ~ .; o :il :i: :;;l o .; ('I' N- N o 0 N o ~ '" ~ o ~ ~ o o ~ ~ "' o o ~ ~ ~ '" ~ o o = ~ ..: ~ 8 8 ~ <') <"l ...j ....- ....- N ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ..; ~ o o ~ ~ o 'i o ~ 0 :D ~ '" ~ ~ N ~ .; ~ 8 ~ .. ~ 8 ~ ... ii ~ I ! ... ~ "'~... iR! $}.ic uc E 2l ~ :j! f ~ ... :1= . ~... a ~ ~ ~ N N >- ".'1 it 0 ;; ;:: ~ :i ~ ;; " 0 ~ N ~ ~ = ~~ N .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N 0..2 := -.0. ! - . ~... Ii ~ ~ ~ ~ ::; N X "& 0 ;; ;:: ~ :i ~ N '7 0 ~ ~ ~= N .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0...2 , c'J '" - .0. ~ "'- " 0 :!: ~g . 0 ~ ~ :i ~ N ~ ~ N m ;0 ;; ;:: N iil ~ :;; :;; -" ..c'J 5 N .. ~ ~ ~ ~ '"''' 0 ~~ ~ m ~ 0 ~ m N ~ ~ 0 := ~ > :;; 0; m N !l; ~ ~ = :;; "- ;! := ~ ~ ~ :!: ~.g "'.. - - m ~ - N ~ ~ ~~ I! ;:: ~ a ~ N N ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ Ii ~ :l ~ ~ E ~ ;; :!: := ~ ::; ~ ~ N m ~ ~ m -" c'J N N N N ",,, " ~g c :;; " a ~ N N ~ i< ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ;; :!: := ~ ::; ::! N :;; ~ ~ ~ ~ m -" ~~ c'J N N N N l:'i1ii . , " ~ , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 :;; :g ~ ~ ~ I! - " ::l " a ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ;; :!: := ~ ::; ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m :l ~ ~:g ~,[ N N N N N . " ~ iil Ii m m a ~ ~ " 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~. II '" .. ~. "' N - 85 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ '" .... .... - - L ~ 0 0 ~ 1l 0 :. a ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,g'" '" " g ~ " ~ z , ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ " () ~ C N 0 N , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" E " 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~. 0 0 0 0 0 .,; E .- := 0 ~ () J1 ~ " ~ m N N ::; 8 0 0 ~ - ~ ~ N ;! := 0 ~ m 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ..; ~ " " .- ..; .,; m .,; '" '" ~ ~ ~ " 2 ~ ~ m m ;! m 8 ~ ~ N 0 X , ~ 0 ~ 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ '" '" .. ~ "' '" ..; .- .,; - - N .- ~ ~ E ~ ~ , ~ ~ m ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ , " - '" .ii ~ ~ ~ - ~ 0 0 ~. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "'- " - - . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ N ~ ~ '" ~ 0 :!: 0 :3 0 ~ 0 0 0 .... ;:: 0 0 0 0 ~ Jl " .- ~ "' .,; m .. .,; ~ .. ~ m m (!) 15 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ '" " .- .- ai N ~ ~ :g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m :0 ~ ~ 8 8 ~ m ~ ~ ~ 1l N ~ 1l ~ N m ~ .lS ~ ~ ~ ~. m 0 0 ~ 0 ~ N N ~ ~ ..; '" " ~. .- '" "' " :0 "' '" ~. " ~. ..; N - - N ~ ~ H ~ N ~ N m 8 N 8 8 8 0 ~ w ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ;; ~ ~ " m ~ "'. g .,; m '" '" .. '" - ~. '" ;:: ~ ~ m ~ ~ :. m ~ ~ 0 c ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ,g " ~ '" .. ..; ~ 1l ~ 0 m 8 ~ 0 ~ ]1 ~ ~ Sl ~ () ~ 0 ~ ~ N ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ " "' 0 ~ ~ ., '" ~ ..; .,; '" ..; - ..; ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ . ~ := ~ 0 :;; g ~ 0 8 ~ N .'1 m ~ N ~ m ~ ~ 0 ~ m ~ m 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 N. 0 ~ ., :;; ~ ~ is " '" ..; .. g ., '" ;:i .- ..; "' '" ~ N - - N - - ~ ~ 8 0 8 ~ I "" 8 ~ - N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ := - ~ ~ 0 22 - N ~ iii 8 -1 ... i.i ~ li "8 :E ... o ::> .2 !! ~ ~ !! ;8'" ~ ~ S!'" :>'0 $].,l:c U c i I '0 c:: C ~ D c:: i! R. "'- C :!? .2'0 M ~ ;; N M ~ ~ :;; a- '" ;g ;0 ~ '" '" 0 '\' M - N '? 0 0.- "? q- :;; <;; '\' .il~ 5 '" "7 '1 "7 <> "7 "? :!!. u ",> M ~ N ~ M a- N'" oil. ~ ~ ~ N a- 0: ~ ~ <> ~ q~ > ::! ~ M ;; '" ~ N H '" a- - '" '" ~ - ~ - - - N N ~ M _ /!'E '" :!? '" P ~ ~ <> a- M 0: ;; 0 a- N 0 ~ 0 ~ N N 0 M a- ;! ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ 0 M N N M N N N a- N M M M a- ..,-~ ,. 8~ ~ ~ 8 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" !i= ~ 0 0"0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OI '" .\I " 2 ~ z 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " '" U ~ N N 0 ~ M M :0 E M <> 0 0 0 0 0 <> E '" ..: ..: 0 a- a- .Q 0 N N E ~ 0 N ~ 0 ~ N ~ 0 '" . M N <> a- ~ 8 0 '" 0 '" M ~ " '" a- '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 .; .. .0 0: .; ;; .0 .0 .; .; ..: .; ~ & '" ~ N M <> '" '" M E 2 ~ 8 a- a- 0 ~ ~ ~ M 0 0 0 0 0 N -!l '" N. .; .0 & - N N E ~ ~ 0 ~ . m M 0 0 0 '" 0 0 '" '" -. 0 - - :0 .il ~ - M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" . u ~ N N I " M 0 M 0 0 0 0 M ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <!J M N N '" 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ..: ~. ~ m 0 >: N ~ 8 0 '" '" 0 8 N ~ ~ ~ N a- <> 0 0 '" ~ '" 0 ~ 0 '" ~ M a- '" '" '" 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ 05 -. ~ 0 '" :!~ '" .0 0: .; ;; .0 .0 0 05 '" :0 .; ..: .0 .; a- '" ~ N M <> - N N '" '" '" 0 :il '" H ~ '" '" ~ M 0 5l. 0 0 0 <> '" 05 '" - M M ~ ~ <> <> N 0 M <> 0 Cl .\I M 0 0 <> 0 ~ 0 0 ~ '" '" .; ..: - N 0 ~ 0 0 U M 0 0 ;j! '" 0 ., 0 0 0 0 "'. - - . 0 0 <> ~ ~ 8 ~ 0 <> ~ ~ ~ N ~ " <> '" a- '" ;;; '" ~ ~ 0 M '" M ~ ~ N a- 0 0 "'" 0 M ~ 0 0 15 '" ~ ~ .; .; .; '" .0 .; ..; 0: .0 - ..: .; .; ~ N N - - M '" - N N N ~ ~ . g ~ ~ ::! 8 0 0 0 :e < ! - N M ~ '" <> ~ '" a- ;: 0 0 0 '" N M ~ l2 ,; u ~ . u " o ~ N " o o . u ~ o " " E E o u ... o ~ t ~ jj E . " .. ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ 11 ~ '" o .Q o ~ l1 o g .Q o '" "6 ~ o o ~ ~ o .. ~ ~ ~ 8-123 ~ c E E a i G) E IS ,~ ;1 ~, f I ~ Sl ::I .c o w , W oo'" C c C-o '" c o c: '0 is ....- .,.. l:Q ~~~o gog~ CI::ECli5 € € ~ is is 'S; ~ ~ W '" o :I: :;-0 W c 'C 0 c_ -0" c W .8~ CD ~ = c ",,0 '8'0;' E ~ -0- c - C c _::E .g Q5 ,,0 is....:;. CD"- :Ea~ .s;.5.s C Q)""" cQ)- '0 iii ~ :Ewcn w 1': CD 13 ~ i ~ CD > 13m2 'C E c. ]! CD.E t>> o-o-oc 0> '>0- l:: :s2 .5 ~- 'l!! 0. -. [ f!2~o c"'c.= 3: -0 CD C o 0- ~ 0 _,.... ... (J c.s; Q) 0. h~~ cuEc:"C ..c (5 CD C FO _ 01 0 I I~ ~i COO H Q !!l "':"6 ..;Il; al c C C C C E C C C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 C => C ~ " W I o1i "- - C g~ti "'_w -ceO o C - E C w",'" ago a~Q) "c'" ~8.g o c.CI .....<C12 i:i: CD = -g en 0 o~o _Wo ~ Q),g 0..;:51: -ECD 3: 2 E ",-1: E g R !5iii 2l o o.c ~'" W n.l1 E ~ .... a. > 0> 0 11.50; 0) ~ a> c~c ~c~ ~~~ o .5:; E E a E .2 g8 E ! 0> C :g R W = '0 1': CD . ~ .~ g>y c", C CD Eo W c fiw '" ;!! '" c i! It '"' ~ ..; C ~ "- Q C '" '0 ~ c ~ CI € ~ o ~ _.2 "6.E ... Q)(j.E U 'C &II .21;"0...;: Q.i5 c (.) "Ec.2"" C~~:!i o W 0 'O"E.cQ) c:;t:-..c: ~g~-;: ill g", ~~JlI'i Q) E Q) en -au.!! ~.;.9'5 C)i~n ~ - c C o~~~ D..c:o- SQ)U.Q 0> CD CDU'i .! ~ 5.~ ~CD-.:.I. u~n. .2 c>-c ODO jj al ~ 0> _ c zj2:o o ~ c . ~ Q) 0 OJ 'OO>CD'" Q) ..., ::I ":;: s:-g5in ~ :::l > 0 ~i~al C~CD_ .c - c _ 0 CD_ .g -; E !? ,;;::10)0 i5:i~~ ~88.8. "E " ~ i ~ w !!' i! It "! ~ ..; C ~ "- C o '" '0 ~ c ~ CI " 1: ~ o ~ ~ c g 6 c c c ~ -.Q 0_01; o 5.i 5 E "6 E'~ 0 :65>:& E 0 ~ Q) o--.c 8>~"E~ ... d) 0 III a. C CII Q) o~5D: c c '" ,2 a. g. i- 8~~~ :::l 8 C E .,; alu.l1.pj C Q) en (.).a 0:55<00 ~<s~:g~ "'::3:::l.:./.- a; l!! ~~ a 01;;.....0 '0 w ~ c W o ~ c '0 ~ u .2 11 W 5.i.1i o>U c.l1 .!!! g' l!!:g ~[ 6 '8 " ;E !!' i! It "! ~ ..; o ~ oo C C '" '0 ~ c ~ CI 11 '" ~ '0 "3 C _ c CD w 5E.! "'C '" CD 2 c.9:!2Q) o,9..9:c u-c- ~ ~ CD '" o.;ciR -Q)C"C ~ >:s2 c CD 0 0 C "0 > 0. c ~~Ql~ o ~.5 c _01:8 "C E Ql = 3: ~ ~ c c.go~ ....Ql-- ,9!"al'" Q:;;.t::8. -a c.~ . 'O:a ~ Cta.>c- c _ " 0> :s2 C <D Ql oRCD2 o..:::I.ot; o c !!! c !!! W = I :il ;l! . 2' :il f -~ . 0 C .. ..; 8-124 C ~ oo C C '" '0 ili 1: C " CI 11 ~ 08 " U 0> - CD c ~:E3Z .2.2 8. ~ al c ,g ~ .~ Ql "C B =.5[ ~.8... ~~E - [~ ljw8. e~CD g:g 6 ~8.~ a....;: W W U .t:: a. 2 -1;;t; co c '000 - CD u ~:E'O al~ E~ W._ Eo W - . e.ilal Ec- -o.g c-- ~ 0 ~ ~ - 0 >-c'O Q"5 C - E C aoo> Q) -.~ W W w ;~~ ~c:i8 .5 ~.!2 W - 3: fic_ i ~ " CD ::J .5 .. ..; C C ~ ~ oo oo C C C C '" '" '0 '0 ~ ~ g g CI CI "Q "Q :2 :E ~ ~ C ~ ~ o " c ~ CD.!! C "w .2 c ~:g .8 .Qc:c;:~?J~g -a OQllD_C 2..,c.c~c ~~$.E~~~ :g~C-gEo.~ cwo>c .80 o.cc.... .i?: :i~:g g ... g C ccg,....:t:t:::J >0> ceOE c 'O:g-5}e a.213E '::8 ~~&~.5~"C ~>.EaJ~c6 "C ~ Q) 0 C = ~.t:::E.~o6g ~.S!~-g~~5 ....~.2 6~8.u ~ g 5 'iij 1!! ~ u ...w.... ~a.. U al '!l >- 'E !!! 3 u o c '" 0> c :g [ a; g !!' i! It a; ~ '" .. ..; .5 ~ ~ 0> c :il 8. Q 1': CD '0 .~ o c .: a) _ u CD c fie. c .9 o E 0'0 ~6 '0"" nO c CD -" c- c c CD 3: . ~.!~ a.8:2 "al !!! - CD C """ F' w w '" E l '" c i! It ;g c CD -0 '" CD '" .. .. ..; 11 .l1 '" c i~ ~5 .. E ..8 ";0 ~ o e e i i Gl e e o :t:& ii a~ i! i. I ~ o i o o ~ o ~ ~ o => c c < " 0= = 0 ;; " 010 -g a .Q c OI.!! c= :;:: c 2 E ~(; 0:; QB ii; 0 .- " 0_ OIg .5 Co ~ 0 ~ a 0. o 0 <D:! . U:g ~e:!!! .. 0. 0 .~i 0_ " c " " I~ ,,- >'" 28 ~'" " E => 0 c ~ ,,- ~~ ~ 0 01:; ~~ ~8. ~ a . ! c ~ . .. '" c ~!l! ~c :11 o ~ ~ o o .; ;;; <<>> 'E o " ~ E o c..!I!: ~ 0 0. ~l~ a " 01 => 0 c a '0 '2 ~ ~ 0 0l.Q Ol ~~.s;; ..~~ 8..... ~ " " al~= mQ)- 01- 0 " a c :::J.s;o .au:;:: -g8~ aU" 01 . " oS; E:E o a ~ 01.... Q). 5 ~-g co.=> o 0) C g.:E ~ - " " g!~- " a 0. o E E (; ~~ =0 Jl 01 ~ c ~~ OI~ .g~ 01- a.fJ o c c 01 ~8. ~ E (:. 8 o ~ o o o :if <J> 6 o o d ;;; '" o o '" "5 ~ a => o "E! :2 ~ o ~ " " c E ~ " l "5 z 1J~ , iiie co cbN 8wgo N~C\liD'E QUota) (6 0 .... g E a~~a~ ::l~OUE OJoa5- :g.\:€~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ u: '" c ~ a ::! ~ ,.; ,.; "5 ~ "c." c .iOa 55 .9:;:: ~ a CD .~ -g= 13 liS .5 "C 0'-' :E .~ ~ ~ c " "' . ! 5 o.~ E 8' 8 a c c c 01 "0 "iij ~j o c a c -;;;=0 i-8 U 0 ,," (:. a = i!! c ~~ - " OlE :?j g! 8.~ " E =- ag ~g. (; 0 'c'O ~1! (:. c t 9 .. .. ,.; ..; go ~ ~ ~ u "0 c .2 ~ .. :j~ o ~ ~ E ~ ;; " l "5 z .. o o '" "0 iD m "'~ c c => c 0< " c o ~ .. o <J> o o o d o ~ 6 o o d ~ '" o o '" "5 ~ c => o " '" => o ~ o c - C >" ,,- '1i g " (; " ~ - 0 .5:0- c c o c 13-<> 0;::(5 ]j~ - 0 ~:E ~o() =6B "5.9 >0. .!l " " Ii 6~ c c "''' -mQ "T6 ~.!!! - 0 ~Q o 01 - c 2!:g <1: 8. '5'2 ~~ .og ! E 0 ~!12~ 111 r::: Q) Q) ~32r::::E a6E~ 1;; Q, <D a ;;: g>~ E. 0:;:: 0 0 '30>- J::Q)c:J2 o E a c: c: 0:1: ~ ~ ~ ai Q) c i ~ 2 8 8.~.g j l!' i! ~~ ~ ! => ~ --:.ia "! .. .. ..,j cri 8-125 o <J> o o o .; <J> 6 o o ..; <J> <Ii o c .!! 3. II g a .s 2 ! ~ c g LO. &Q; ;; 2 E <J>" " > > C i!! " c c 8.~ => c '0= iIle .8 11 => o 00 o c 00 tiE: ~" <J>" C C> o o '" "5 iD '" C ij ;; u: C> o o '" "5 ~ g o ;; u: ~ " c "s .Q .; c (j) = E E~ ~ B 1:;2 c 01 o c :a:g ;g8. g :B 01-= C _ :g~ 8.0 c2 " " :; ~ '" c ~ 8 "5 ""8 o a ai . CD Q) a. E :E '5 C a. o e Q) <0 -e~2 ~.!~E c.;;.Qo ~ c: co- - 0 " ~0,,1i a-="E! .... C ::::J g!lDo 0".. o:EJ:; ... 01 01 E -E ~ - => " ",,- ~ ~ ~ oCS-g ,,- 0 (:~~ "5 " c Q) ~ ....t=.9 E . ffi c ()... 8' ~ ~ a: ~ g . cG>ou "E"O"C ~ <DEe!i5 f! = ~ Q) o Co - .c: 'E~:a- UJcc~ ~C)Q)= :it: & E ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~u.E:g (:.~5i8. c ~ " ~ e . " " " 0 =>!l 00. g= ~ E U "C i1;" (; c E.Q ~ - c.g Q)= "' c ~ > I i ~ 0() ,.; ,.; I . .l! c ~ g> :;z fgo ~Hj ..;In ~ ~ E :::I en ~ i E 15 :l:~ i~ ,2~ ii! f i ~ o l! o "6 " c: " c: " C c: " " ~! !l! c !!! 8.~.!!!8-g ~~~~c ~6oo~ N<I)~~r::: o~2g8 ic'ti(Jo t: .~ ~ "'C :s g ~ i 5 a; ~ c.", ~;E ~ CI) en ii: ,,~~ "",," E ._ 2: :::J C -a.CQ) i w-g ~ J::.!COl -g .Q :! .S OQ.lD"O .r.::~tjo "c:'" ijl' :E ~ f?.... It -.- 0 .Q:;;;-gc og,g"O o.:=.:!-gw "E-g50C ~o'5ig ~ 11.8 z ~ o c " ~ u c ~ '0 - ~ 0 ... 6 -agajw g~Eg~ ~:l::.g J::. :::l ~.s a ~ ~ :2 OJ 0; .l2 ~ " Cl c: OJ .c om~ J: ~ iil \l 0 II) C <:; C ... :;:~J:U ...: g- ~ ::J E ~ as ~ m ~ €;~B o '" '" g '" '6 Iii 1: C a 1!! ii: -'" .go o c: q~ '" c: q;. .Q EQ o 0 "'> " Cl &.= Clt! c: a II " ao; ~E .- ~ 1:_ " c: iS~ !2 - 0 " lR 0"5 g~-g ~o.c: ~~~ o .!!,! ~8.0) o &~ '628. " 5 Cl & ~ c C) '0 :;:: c o.Q :s2-Q &"6~ Q)5~ .5 5i"i 2 i.r.::g~ >.Ql~o O.r.:: E:; "'6 0 ijl' O::c:",_ " c: ii: go II f ~ ~ .. ... ,.; o '" o '" " g a. J: 2:- "2 !!! 5 u o 1D "" ,\1 " ~ 3 E Cl c: 3 .~ '6 Q 8. o :E " " J: "2 o u " " ~o .~ "E C! ~ o "2 <3:e !!! ~:g :; - > " 2:- fj '6 ~1:J ~ -" ''':i ::; E ai 0 11l 051_'0..::.: ~ ... ~~ g >.l2 u> i1; ,g ii !.Q ~ :::J.:x:-::l:::J B g ~tj 8 i () 0= ! !Ii " ::i! ... ... ,.; o '" Q)Ji ~g ~~ ~ 8. B E ...I,g o o o g '" o o '" '6 Iii 1: C " a 1!! ii: ! '5 ~u1;; - c: '" - &:-g~ cbo~ g ~ CD C\l.Qt - - C ~ 0 :::::l c"a ,,= Cl ~ "E ~ <I) M c o c: () '0 " 2 ~ 1!! '" c .e il "" g i.!i "g 1:.c: " " o > " .- " E H. c: " c.c: ,,;. i!1h -:gO) 8- i; t:~ Cu c: C o ill !! j .1l ~c: 2":g "0 " ~ ~ ~ c c. E .c:" " ~ 0 "t; i. g ~ ai ill " s ~8 ".. ;;~~ .c ." .Q g'1! "2c"E as .Q Q) c g ~ ~ :::J 0 ,,- - Qjc.,Q :!: g ai Jj ~ i " o U . ... ,.; o '" o o o <5 '" '" ! 0 a:!li! !;;;b O,rs8 ~<I)~ ~~! i'6 g "6,gQl :::lu'Q ~ ~ 15 ~UlM i; -g....o o ~ .., Q) U').::.tu.o =tt:.261J 1"')",,,,3 ""-.5 lD 0 ""0-0 NO!':! 'lta~.Q ~ 3 .2L~ cg:Q15 - c :::I ... Iii c ~ " ;E ~;~ " c: C Ql.E 0 E () J:: en Q) &g"2; '? E 8 ~ '3 ~ 1l-c E J:: E !!! c I- '" Q) ~~8& .l2 3"0 Q)Qc > 0= C ,g:a8 ",!!!'f, .Q 0 Q) 01 C '3 c:.c:" ~:;J:: au,; Qi E cs () l!:!--5 1? g .5 c :g:Q~~ Q) =5 '0.0 0::.5 E E 2' II f ! ,.; ,.; 8-126 ~ ~ ,u= Q) c Q) = C E co~coo... .ECS.!.EE..;8. .;;:._".;;:.!1liiC:0 .a"EUI"-1D'-~ r-.2Q)O~Eg- '"": Q) Ql co. c _-0 ~a;-t;~~m:;; ;;... ;; l!! ti o '" '" o o '" ~ c " a u c: o $ o '" '" E e '*'= Q):3Q)ag ~O"O)Q)co "oJ::Eg..... c <o:f @ ~-g5.e1l ]! 0.6.Q:2 ~~::=a5 ...C'\IOCJ:: ~6~ii ~~c:i~... 0) c g :gE1212"Q; 8. ~ 9l ~E _ iil E " " c (; Iii Iii E .E.E a. i m.~.,jm.(O) iilc:iliiiil'" 0<1>"0)0"0 C12 E.E 6 ~.e~ c. 'e :: al '" 0 c. ~ m. ~ ~ ~ . -0 a.E!!! _(I)Q).2 gE"Qg g"2a.;; ",g,aOl .!Q)l<<~ o.o~... o~~~ ~:g~~ -a a"O.!l E1J~ Q) 0 (5 (; j!:.=ca.. j .. c: i!! f ... ,.; ,.; ~ c E E a j J ~fj J!ciil .co $a.: i! 2. I ~ .2 ::l .c U o '" "C " c E a; ;; "C c ::> Q)UI~ Oco ~.Q N -~o o C ~ ~ 0 " ~u1: 0" g a ~CJ "Co.e "',a:s (: 0 ~ ~ 1!"C8. - c " 1l.0~ ";:: ~~ 1?:::l Q) "'" E ~. 0 ~ 01 Co i~lJ .e "C c OlcO ~82 > 0 ~ e~u Q.u~ E:::l::: _"C 0 ..aal lj"'.al c ~ CD ~8c <D;;::.! lJ o~ c.s;;; 0. ~ ~ E g 8. 8 ~ o '0 ~ &~ ~'" _"0 c c " 0 ~.m .- ~ "0 c H 0'" .E ~ -" u- .c" '" E ~ii .e - ~'" > u c 8. .2:~ "5 u ,g 0 .c " U 01 o 2 l!! ~ ~ 0 . g:E~ -~... '""0- 01,,0 c N"O ~;;" 8.n ~-g2 ...~Q. o '" o o o ,,; '" ., o o '" a; "" o ~ CI "C C o u " ~ o '" al c ~ " ;; "C C ::> ;; obLi: o ~ o.~ o 0 "6 0;: -0'" ~~o~ gg~a. CI 0( 0 E .c_:JO -sgau 0"0 ~ a () c " = ~ " ~ .e g as ,,;; "E E ~ " " .e ai: ~E 0" -"C .20 0- u " 08. " ~~ .Q)'E ~8. g> 0 ~ . 1l. a.2~ o.Q Q) Cc.c 08::= ~o;~ c2l!! .- '00 0>_ Q..eal ~!'E ~ - -E 51 8. 0"0 " "'C c.c . '30-~ ~-gg.g "'....'0= "'''5-0 -e g 5 ~ 5 ... -5 Ol ii~H _1! ~ 0 ~ ~ () Q. o '" al c E a; ;; "C C => ., o o '" '0 ~ o ~ CI .e "" ~ o ~ cOo . g ". CD CD _ l:::;;;:; --___0;;;; o 0 0 ~ .- 0 eEl!! g:g Co ~ e () " 8. '0 '0 Co c, 6 .., .... Q) J2.S c co.2l =E.~.;",E .Q2lJ~o~ .! ~,g ~.., Q) 6a~-.oo-8:E .... :;;:: 0 c 2J ~ g.! E 0 :ali(j)~~i oa1J2=a.g OlEcC.E", .s;;; c 0 Q):; . ti00-"'ual " 01 0 "E 0 "C O:ElE~.!05m ... 0 :::l Q) - C -3!Ql-l!!.E.., .- 013.Q O.c CD 8 "0 1) li: .9-.Q g () C._ a. Q).J::. a. o.a In..c 3= .., Q)Q)S! o.:.!g, ~c.Q ._ E.o .00> "-.0 pc o 0 ~ a.g c 2:> ~ . m.QlJg :::J Q) = .e.ell cOoo.. o.s - c.. .!!! 01 0 " C " 01 E - Sl 0 0 ~ u E o '" o o o ,,; ~ '" 6 o o o '" 2' ~ 2' () ~ .e 'i! ~ ~ u U J! ~ ~ J ~ :! a; ~ '" .0 .0 ,..: .; .; .; 8-127 .Q -E ~ ~ 1! 6.!! 0 E.e u _0 .E g:c .!!! ~ 01 l!! _~ . c o"E ~:;::: "'._ Ql.E a;o;~8. ~ ~.....Q Q) ~ .e B c_ _ ~.!.5 $ ~82-t; lD - C CD ~ -g 8i5 ., 8 '" '0 ~ o ~ CI € ~ o ~ o '" 01 C ~ o E .. ~ a ~:e H "0 ~ B ~ .:l " u= 2 " ,,0 uE ~Q - Q. .0 0 ~- ~ E 2 ~ ~ Co. 01 Q) .5 -~ %8. CD -2, "0 .e Q. c ~o~ :2 Q) 5 =00 a2 ~-ij .!:2 ~ E :a l g. -:~Q5 .9 CD a; c:S'O ~ -g a . .g~C! Q):l:g ~ 0 u .S C CD C :I: ~ oo.! U"CC ~ u o . _"C j!i g,.Q .S:!:t:: .0 ~ " u >E O"C .e " ~ 0 "0 iD o.e ...- >"5 o ~ ::iB .e", () 0 w ~ .~ ~ c o c ,.. ~Q -= :5 Q u- ,,2 0- " li: ~ Q. " 0 =~ ~ c E E ::I en i ~ E o &l .'" iHj J!.;j ~Cl li}.c ~ f I i S! ::I 6 U lQ: c::: ! woo ~~o-~~ ~ U ~ ~ " .s;;6.2~E ~E..ac~ 8.~ g"O.c o tn ~ 5.l Q) -;; .S 0 Q) a. o~~:52 ~ 8."0 i 15. r::i >Q)~..c:!!!a -g:EI-~oa: c.!!N"iE~ ai.Q.....g-g~ E~-g-g~.s 0'0 0... Q) 0) 1:; (<')Q)-c :::1"'0 ',.. O:i! O:;N....g... O~ ~:Q"ij) 8- f '" g 5 .... (ll ~ o:a -5i.~ g .:..Q c: o:s::_ 011.0....00 W*R 0,,- 8."":u In 4i c: ",>0 _clDO ~:g ~..... :::l 8.%0- c.. .~ a a g ~ , o ........( ~ 1:5 .!!!;.~g~ !'Q):::J:DlJ lD'6ln1jO ~E~Cii~ ="'5<->0 2 Q c: ~.c Q) a.:E Q) C " u: _" UO~O_ o <no o <no '" " '0 '" " o " ",,." .Q:t::~ .8- ~B~m~ Q. -..0:::1 U -llooal- > 8.1l _ 0 8EC~"5 - - on_ o c g.g ~ c.5 :5.5:i! :g .5 0 C) 6 &,E13-EQ. OCDQ).!O ~~5ai~ :::::J..c: C'I....x ~~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 ~:!:: CO) -5 a. 03: . :Q~ ~o-E~ c .- ~ Q) ~ c -g -g '8 E 0 "EO~o:Cc. co:ga.o~ ::E..o~ooe >Q> '0 o - ~ ,,0 is 8.Eo- ::J"C-lD go C):E "CD' ..c: r::: 0 c.c'2 o:sa- 0- 1>." - 0 " o:.E0 0l'OQ.:::l ~ (j (j):C c 01 '1J C":lo>>oco of! Q.~ 1) 0:-:0 0 .Q.E Q)"2 -0" 5 ~ "ClD(j)Q)ut!2- ;:53:"8:Qa~ ~~Q)E'5~C "-E:C "lJ.c..a.!! .... .., 0 -.!2 0 ::I:iiilR.ci-> U-a;lD.e>g..Q;! iS2u:EOCDoc :t:~ au::: -'~ 0 o'ti- .....0< o i .E go i! o Do I :a ..,... o <no o <no '" " "5 '" " o o <no o <no '" " '0 '" " o ~ :ll c~o.:i ~& ~~.!li5 H c'" 51 E : ~ !=l!)~.... ~g C) .:5 e 0 "C .= "liEa.~ -<4 i5-oEo ~'" a.a':::=Eu.i:Q~ Q)i<n~~iC!o "C 0 '20.0 Q) 0 a. ="Emc:::Jco_ ~~go.EC)'1JO "'o-~"Ecac ~ '1J a. 0032 <D 0 as<D~iO&-2E6 c:5 = 0 Q as g. tl oc'S Ql-o'1J C-::i> Ql C - C Cwo :gC!.o:Ro:?illQl oQl _Cc:i!'1JC c.K ~-w-,,- t1! o~:Q~ E 8.:c~ :::J 1) ill ~~ g. 0 02'i.2 :aill'1J~uJ'28..2 ~~~&~~~2~ ~:g.i U'1Jiij: 2::I: <D ~~.2 0'" 0 o - ~ Q-5-t; alH' Q) = ~ 0 "'" 8. ~ o. .a c:?c.2 2-32:O::Ql c_c,e ~ 8. ~ -;: 5 c 8.u o C "" Ql .!!o~1J t1!~u;$ Ql "C 5 C ~oo- >u 0.1= Ql E~:5 8 :?..Q ii:.QG) .Q ~ ~ :~ i5 0 E" u 0 . ~.Q ~-g o ~ ~ ~ U <D 0 Ql "alou .8 - a; '" :5 ~ E oS lD't;;Q)~ ".2~8. goO ~5i ~t "5 ~ i"'! ~~~ ..,"\l~ ~1i5 Ii! ~ 2 t;; 01 " i! ~ .. ii ~ '0: I ~i5 8-128 ~ o E ~ II) ~ l! ... E E o lJl III I ~ ~ I ~ .!2 i! u aO.9! 8-8 '" C o c 0 5 lii:g CD ~ 1::r::"t:J,,! a~~5 € €! ::::l :I ~ 00> ~ ~~ '" 0'" :;" ~ C .~ 0 0"" " w C ~ ~ . .8;;- . ~ .<: - ~8 H -g::- o 0 _:E g~ a-, ~ €- :5g~ .S ';: ~ 0$- :5...Oi o en !!! :E.....tn ~ ~ l:! E ~.!! ~ J;i~& ~ ~ E OJ ,s:'O r:: g'os:g '85.-.8. ~.g~o cl")5j:.::: ~ ~ > :5 .g.....!!!o C.s;lDa. :tucl> 8~;;.<: lD E c "C ?.Q & 5 Attachment 2 i C 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ " C " o ~ ~ "':'0:0 0-0 o~.. "'_w 000:0 - E 8 ~'CN c.!!:'6 a=lii .<:C" tag h~ . il: ~ ;; "'C <4 0 e ~- ~u 15 u ~ 0 ~.l::: -E ~ ~ 0 E !'::t "E e 8. E 0 ~ o I! C u 2l- ~== 53 g.g E "S; 0) g. J(c(jj 0>3 ~ .5~C ~c~ f~5 0.5 E E8.E .2 8-8 ~ .. ~ 0> C '" 8. ~ ;; o "E ~ " E ~ g~ 5~ Eo ~ C " w = .!l !!' '8 o ~ ..., .; o ~ ~ o o '" o ~ o ~ a .<: " ~ o ~ o c:E ... lD(j.2 u" w .g]!-g a~:g "tI c" - 5 ~ ~ II -g"E~~ ::I 3:: mS Ll-,8-c ~ ~ g:c a:5.g'~ - E ~ w ..! 0'0 Q) ~.::.e~ 1?i ~ 'U ::;: - c: 0 02=i c..~5o CIllDU_ C 0> ~ o CD ti '\"" CIl :::J C 0) '5C:~~ CIl CD ... .... u @;e 8. .Q 5~5 1ii~ 0>_ C ~~~ o c c . ~ CD 0 ~ ClQ):o;:: j-OE~ ~~~g -m!!!-o 1:3 ~ Qi .!! J::o'i.Q :g-;E~ 1i;:::JClOl i5:a~.5 CD C .... ~ ,,88.8. ~ ~ ~ I a ~ w !!' '8 o ~ "! .; o ~ ~ o o '" o ~ o ~ a .<: " 5 ~ J!: 0 g 5 C 0 C 'E - ,2 0-00 o &i 5 e :g ~:~.2 - (J ..5 E (5 ~ lD 2c-:5 ~Q)-gc ag;~1 c~5a: co= ~ a. 0.0 i- 0'0 _'2 g.;;"2 ~ . i8~E8a c: Q) III ..Q ~:5 6 Q)"8 0"'=:0:;1 Qi31.Qo.s ~~::::l~~ <3.. ~. u o w ~ C ~ o ~ o ~ u .Q "2 ~ c " ~il ~,g .!!! gt ~'" ~8. c o ~ " w '" I "! ~ .; o ~ .. o o '" o ~ o ~ a "2 ;S " 8li... .<: E ~ u::l!)g c .m !:! CD O.2.2c XH'8 .Q~g;8. lDQ)32"O ij; -556 "O~a.c ~ c CD .Q . E 15 .2o'Eg "9."E~= G) ~ t5: 0 c"O 0 ~ "'al-:lii! -1j;;io =....ca. 8. 0 -" . - ~ o>i{l- Pilj' oR~2 a..~JJU; o c ~ o ~ ~ ;; <Ii ~ ~ .~ Ol ~~ H 6.2 .<: w - ~ <Do .<:= 58. J Jl f '" . c " ~ ~ u o .. .; o ~ .. 8 '" o ;; " g a "2 :c ~ .. B801 ~~~ .2!2 8. ~ i 0 o~~ Q;lJal .c.5 8. i~... ~?J~ - 8. ~ ~...8. E ~ al 2:g 5 ~8.g> o.~= lD a. g .c_iJ; ~ ;; OC <; U -a;~~ "'_0 i~ "Eo> ~ C E:a !'3-d E.2 al _co o~:g ~..Q 5 Q~-g - E 0 8.00> m~~ -.<:.2 ~ ~ C .~ ci 0 ~~~ ~';;j z ~ il :::i .5 .. .; 8-129 o 0 ~ ~ .. o o '" o ;; " ~ "2 :c ~ .. o o '" o ;; " o ~ a "2 :c ~ o ;. lj ~C:6~ 8.2w15.c o>J;l31E~ ~ ~ t: ~ ~ &2~~ a>.Q:g g g'2 8. 5'- c 00 0.0-= .2aiglii Ql 0 a.lJ a; >.5 ~. lJ 3:0).... :2..2:5 ~ ::IQllD'O ..2 00 t: ... - ::I ~ ~:::Io g U ...~ a .s ~ ~ "" "E ~ 3 u o c E ~ 0> C '" 8. li "E ~ " .~ o c -" ~ ~ ~~ 0> C '" 8. ;; g '" ~ '" c '8 '" rt. ~ D rt. i 1i " g ! '" .. N N Pi ..; ~ o E E iil i Gl E E J ~ il go ~ i- t i .2 ::l r. U ~~ '0.8 ~g _ c c c m 0 ~ c li.O .2! a o~ - c H ~ E - 0 aU ~-g Co 0_ C 'g o ~ ~ 0 8.U ~~ ol:u C ,Q ~ ,2'0 .56 oi<' .:.!.u g ~ ~.c 0- C C H~ 0.2!'O .2 'd ~ ... ... ~ 0 Q ~-551;; o ~ o ~ ~ a ~ C Ji: o ~ ~ 8 .; ;; 00 c o ~ l'l E '0 g.! ~~~ o ~ 01 ~ C C a a 12 go ~ 0 o ~ o ~ o o o g ~ .:. o o ci ;; '5l C E ~ OJ '0 ~ g ~ o o N o ~ o ~ a 12 ~ :2~ cO ~~ 8lS8o C\lEN...._ 15TIo~16 iD C ... C E g;~a! CJ~cl~~ :g<€~ ~ 5 ~ ~;; '" Ql 'O-g :g ~ CD '0 ~ ..... 0 0 a. c: Q5 CD ~- ~ ~ 0 .~ ~g :i2~~ 55 c :=J2 8.~~ .2:;:: ll~ .a al ..c: <D Ql 8 -g ~ g':s j'i s "g ~ .Q CD B~ &~o ufj Q)~ '-0 Cc;::.5:g lJ)r:: C. -g,so""'0.9.., 0:; .c '0:;:: .c c: OJ C -- -g8~ -g ...'" MS ou'O ~8 'g1iE is.s! CI. CD 0l.Q 1::;:: C .5 E:E 0 - 15.5 g! .~'a &2 Qi=sa.5.58.2 ~ 2 r:: ~'O r:: 13 0 . ~ ~8: gas ~~3:~- co COle oucE~ Cll on a. c CD g. Qj.2 Ol-U 8.~~~~~ Qig'ii,g Q)'Q';;[j6u. al5 ca ~a.i5ClEE c";:;; ::E! ,!i 0_ ~ C ~ 0 C 0 z! ~- >N 00 .cO o N o E 2 2 ~- ~~ - 0 01'5 C u :i2'E .H -g o . ! ~ J 01 C ~ I 3! ti e>E :aa ~OI - C ~~ OI~ .E ~ O.c 01- 52 o C C 01 0& ~ E (: 8 go ~ o ::E .; .; ~ '. ~ .c - ~ E 0.2 E 01 o 0 u a o C .sg g'i ilo o C :;'2 i8 iJ U ~-g (: 0 .E ~ o ~-E - ~ goE .. ~ - ~ 8.0. ~.5 =0 0'8. ~o o U 'c'O ~j (: C g C 9 w .. .; .; 01 C 'i! ~ ~ u '5 c o '" '0 !i u ., ~a .,~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ OJ '0 OJ >- '5 z o o o ci o ~ 8 o c ~ ~ o o N o ~~ o 0 aJi: '0 C o ~ ~ o o N o ~ " g a .c " ~ o ~ _ 0 -8.! .9 6 ~ ~ >- CD 0 CJ ~i u.Q ... g ~ 1! 0 ~.'" - 0 0- .5u- c..8ai ~6 ~-og Q'<l ~~~ .:::"0 ~ '08. ~ c; iD 6 ~ >1: .=... 0> ~~g.82~ ~~~.Q~~ ogO&clOl 1D_:Ec.5C: :50eC1:E ~~,g~~~ E ~ =a 1?!!! lD.Q 1:1;.- 0 CI:"5 c:3 E ~'" as ~.e H '0 ~ a ~ c'E OI~ ~:2 -ol) ~.!! ~~ 2g' o- n 0'0 - ~ 0 ~.9 ! ~o :;::J.:! ~ .c ~.Q '0 E ~ ... OIlB III c' ,g~c:E ~~ R8.~~ u~ ~ E ~ ~ l~ ~ .E ~~; ~ ~ u c c C "0 t:' co:E~ tic :it 0 . CD ";:: 0 o ~ Q) >. -;;:;:: i: 2 e i5.g ! <Il a. II) = o8.~.5 ~g j go 'i! ~ a i!'= 'ii ~ ;:j~ ...fl ~8 ~ ~ .. .; .; 8-130 o ~ o o o .; ~ 6 o o ..; ~ 0- 8 N o ~ " o a ;; '" I C ... ~ .c ~ '6 ~ " (5 E" .! 0 i,g c 01 o c '5:g ;g8. g $ 01-= c _ ~~ 8.0 oQ ~ ~ "5 !3 ~ 5 C U E ~ if; c B ~ ... .; .; ~ E E .il i E E ~ i 2' ~ i ~ .!l i o ~ E o:Z _-:; c: ,g-" _807;; c 6 8. dS ~" ~1l a "1l c _ o :!. . .!!_E ~ c 8 Eo 0 .- 0 o-g ~~H ~ c: CD ~ !:!t=~ E . ~ 2 g1i> 8'j!~ a: ~ g . ClDOt! CD - '1J.... H~~ o=Q) ... a.~ dI ~2=as wO"E~ Clgo~~ .f: _ E 3: 6~~g' 0..'00=8 ~.2 55 8. <; ~ Ie ~ o ~ ~ ~ Cl> 2 l!! ~ ~ 8 o d .. ~ ~ 8.~.!!!~~ ~~~~o .a ~ 8.'0 1l gc2...~ Nl/lIo..~c: o~.2g8 QjCtiC]S! a,g~'tJ..5 clii~~ "E"" c%w 0:: -~! ~~E ,g e 2 :B :2 ~"C ~ ~]!6Q) -g.2 J!!.5 o a. lD "C J:lD~C Q) 2;:: 5r :6 Q) 0... J:.s.! c 0 .2:;;'2'0 ogo" o.::::!!!-goti E-gi3o~ ~c;;il. ~~B~~ ~ ~ ~ ~-g - ....Q ... 0 ~.Qo~lD !2i6E~Q gi~o~ a c~ ~Q Be l:!.2 ~8. !z ~ - tjGi ;:::5 :2.2 ~~ c ~ Bg> n " ~ ~ i ~ " :! ~ :ll ..; .; '6 ~ ~ .5E~SJo ~6g8.Z";! ~ ~a;::J E,gg ~~~i211 > > ~ c~.8 o ~ ~ o o N a ~ o ~ a ;; 0:: o~ _ 0 o c C!l ~ 5 E~ ,g~ ~ g' ;=8 ~8. 8.~ ~~ t! ~i ~2 ;8~ ~ 8 ~ ~ d ~ ~~M " "'~ 0- ~8.()) _ ~ c ~8';;; 038. ~ 0 Cl ~ ~ c: 0'6 :0:: Co Q :s2-.Q 8. -a, ~ ~80> .s 5i j 2 't:..c:Q.Q ~g~Ci 0"'E3 S g,g ~ ~ c ;;: co ~ i. ~ ~ N ..; .; o ~ ~ u ~ .<; ~ c ~ 3 u ~ i g ~ 15. E ~ E Cl c i a > .2 8. ~ ;e ~ c 'E o u ~ ~ ;s.o .; ::::l... ~ =~ c ~:2 ~ tt.2 :; _ > u ~ > a 5i-8 = ~ cI,) .,; 8 .,; a ~,!'O ~ 0'" Q) 0 J.! H~~i .Q ii lD.Q ~ .E ~ .E is u,g mU 0 j ~ ~ 15. E ~ :l! .. ..; .; Q)~ ~ u c; ~ go ~- - ~ '08. Se ~ 0 <= ~ o N a ~ o ~ a !!! :g 8.:2 C! <0 all , -,,~ Or 68 ~ N 02- C'I ,2 ~ li 1; 0 t.2 ~ c_a a 'o-c 1;; l!. (5 ;i;~~ ;; 0:: " o c o a ~ c ~ c ~ 0" u~ Hi !2:Q 16 ~.;~ E -g ... !~~ ~!i-g ~'2~ go.i! " ~ ~ ~5i'j H.1l ~ 2:Q e'05 ~ u ~ oae ~B~ i.g~ ~ o > c o :E ~ ~ o .2 ~ i .2 ;'a> ;:g t'" ~ ~ o > u~ ~ E H i i u ~ .g8 ~'" - '" . r~ $! l?~ iH ~ g ; ~ ~ ~ ;;51: :E c ~ J ! ~ 8 ... ..; .; l!' 'i! i. I . c o o . ..; .; 8-131 o ~ 8 o ci 0; ~ !!:! ::g 8..:2 ;: Q)a:::a, -,,~ OreS ~ON o ~ - N~~ ~ - 0 t 0 ~ cl'a ~1i" a is. C ~w~ "0 .Q C ~ n o 5i il> (I) 1n":":'O..c '*10.96-0 ~ui:g~ '*10.5(1)0 N'8'!.e '""a"i.2 ~B!~ .5g:215 .... e 5 di 168iii'9 OJ _ E;-gc B ~ ~ ; [g'2Q; 'l'E8= ~ 91 t . E~n = l- ... Cl) .g,..:-g~ e'*lo 0 Ii s :S'O ~ U C l; ~ ~ ","0 ... 0);:: :Q c ~ ~B '0 :g-:;;~ 8.~- _OJ.8~ $ ~.2 g .; g .E g ='000) 0:2::5:5 Q) '0 0 0 ~ e E E go ~ I ~ ..; .; ~ E E .i/ 5 ~ .. E E ~ I i 2- i i c '5 .c o :l: ): ''''C- 11l I Q);: r:: ~ r:: :5 .,j' c: 0 C I::: .Eoi.EEl!F~ >.-lD>.9Q)c'" ",~E",-;;-$ g ::::~Q)~~E8- ..; ~ !!! "Ii i"$-O_ 00 CD1ii..., > lD:Q ~... ;;.!!!-5-cn- ~ o o N ~ t g G " ~ ~ N E ~.." &~~~~ -g..,~~;; ~-g5~.! JC:;6:2'O (1)(")-'0"5 ~oi~.d -"'2..t:~CD .!~~g; !:!"Sci~... Cl c: <n'ofI> g c.-o - ~9-.2Q) 8.:ol ~;g ~ lD cue Q.) :5l:.5 8.j ~~..;lR(") g ci ~ g.. (j<f)oQlo"O .5.2E.56 .!~~ !rE- S. = 0 "H ,*~1!1li 1J 0._ "- o~.!u c: - 0 2 ~1l~1i; ...!ac.g' .1!!,8:B32 eo> 0 i; g>>c"-Q", ~:g~a 8.8.~o: Q) E ... i!: ..c 0 0 c ......::l:CL. I '" c 'i! i. .. .; ..; ~ 0> o .~ ~ ~ 0> is e _ 0 :5U o .; ~ ~ :5 N ~ o ~ G " e o o .9l 0> ~ lLJ, ::::I -= 0 1: ~.~ t c .... 0 Q) co,g> Eil"i5 .g~~;; al-gQl~ :5-:=e-g H>.!l~ :g:g"C'M:: il 8. ~ '" .c:_..c:o ;~::~ .5t;S..... i!: C: 0 .... 8.0~~E ... C5 c ... = ::::I - 0' 0' lP ~ 6:5 ~.~ N'6lD:g-= ~ ~ ~ 8.~ " o '0 :s ~.2 :!.' ;,-'" -" i 6 ~ ~ E"S " e j~ ~~ .2 id :g* iii E j5- ~ $ .<:= ~ ~ i < '" c 'i! i. ., .; ..; o ~ " ~ e E ~ ;; " e " , ~ ~~:5 :SaN N;;:_ o'O~ _ e ~ ~ 0 t tUo o ~ ~ cl~a "E2€ :200:ta ~ ~ ~ ~"O "S. - e ~ :!.o- -.:::~g 1;; ~ ~ lh-e ": 2 :; 0>00 .5;;::-0 Ei5r:: geO -0- 41 0 2 Q~U g-gs -.r ~oi o .>l c 12 l>> .~ 8 r:: lDq::.1!! '0 ~.! O':i! a. ~ - ~ " 8. 0 > o e 8. ~i3 8 g =E~ o 0 ..!!! iii * ij . gE~ -= ):'<t ~ll- ~~~ 8.H Q) '0 '0 ~Sa. !!' " 2. ~ a l! . ~!~ ..., ..; o ~ o o o .; ~ ~ o N ~ t g G " e o ~ ~ e ~ s ~ .2 "E ~ II ~ 50!! :5 E..c: .~ o~ .!! e ~ 0> ID . . c C E e= "'._ Q).5 0;i!:8. ~ i..-9 g'~,gB ~ i .-1 4)8.2.;; (1)- c: Q) = -g 8= !!' ~ ~ ! .0 ..; o ~ II e E ~ ;; " e " ;; cOLi: o ~ d-~ '0 g~ lD.!!! ~ Q) 't: ~ 0 i go~o. G.1:6E €oa8 ~ ~ .2~ o U g> 0 ~ :!. a.~~ 0.2 Q) CaE .Q~i ll.!!~ 1;;~~ 8. >- .!lH ~.Q 8. .g-g.8 . '3o-J! o 0.0 -5~~,g 1!'3sg :i i,g 0 () ... ... en _ Q) ~ c: $-.0:;; _ ~ 0; is (ij~Oa. e ~ o i Ii; N .0 ..; c: 00 - l? 3tlDal-C::;;; o--tO-.;;; d~g'88. ~2UQ)8.O u ~ CIa en ... lD_.EcC.8 =Ei=-;,gE .2!:!"Cj!"52 .!~.Q g,:b CD Q a.~ ~ ~ ~ Q) l? g.! E 0 :!i::;:: .... 0 CD c: ..o~:mE~~ o5cgcu l? E 6 ~ ~ -s . '8o~-=oll lDOlC1: 0 c:'2 ti:s lB g! ~.2 \D in g ::J Q) ~ c: c: U ... CD 15'" - on 'iiiOg,'OO"5~ i5"o~g.-o o6:C lit~ j lit j!Q)~ o ~ > > 00 .Q E:O .00> ~-.o oUe: E e ~ 000 is..g'C 0;> ~ . - C -0 en "2::;Gl,S ltl.c::.c:: 2: c: u '0 Q. c.5 - Q. .2 Q) g' 0 Q) cn- CD ~ g E - .: ~ 8 ~ 8-132 ~ D E E ril ~ 1 I I go :j! f i ~ D "5 6 01 ~ c c;'8 g 8. ~a-g -_0 c 0 ~ :E Gl:; := 0 0 3 - 0 3 ~ 0 o lR i: 'l: '5 CIl ~ ~ 8- 2 ~ 0 -::.!!:!1l ~~iIi c_" 0" ~ E c 0 .g ~ :=! ~~,g c _ ~ := c:!! 5~$ u" c .c ~ 3 ID ~ J!! ~ o c o c ~ 1: ti .s 5 2 0- ~.Q 5- ~ ~ - 0. ~ ~ .s ~ o ~ o ~ ~ 'w ,.... c~ -l15 E-l ~ @ ~ ~ u'S i; _.5 ~ 0 c.0I E c 00 u ... -g !! ~ 0 0 .,;~C>~3 0-</11 ~ 0 ~-gg~<D ~ ~:O"6~!5 o ~ c- c." 0 ~ o OI:! &;oj: Q) -:~;g~c. o-~-2 :a 8."C c: is. d ';; Q) ~ 1! ~ a -g:5 3:ulL oCllNiE~ l2 C..... o"C 0 ell"5"C ~ l:: l1. E.!C:i~.E oco_c>>o ~1JC':!.lD'6.5 u-N.cgi!!: OJ 8 fJ::g Qi 8- i -fii g 5 ... lJl ~la:ctiB: i5~6~~o W~N o.c- ~li-g 01>0 _ c: Q) 0 ~ '8 ~-. .2 [:CO:. e.~ d ~ ~ 0 d) - . o "": .;:(.~ U ~;.~gm !!!:"i)::::lZi"O lD"'alh'OO :5 E CIl Qi CD =x:5>e; 2 2: c: ~ J: ~ 8:~ !!!: ~ Oo~O_ I g' ~ .. i ~ u .; ..; o ~ o ~ 01 C 15 g> o ~ ....c. .Q;;;.2 g- O)- at di .5.5:5lRij; g.-n.g::::lu 'i! 8..i'l ~ 0 2lEO~'5 t~iii ~~~~8. CD 0 <!!!:1:c :o,gom'ti 5.'0 ~ CD a ...'33i!::g,e ~ ~ 8.8 ~ ci> Q:= g>~-E.!:: .E-gU.E~~ ~c~6~8. oo:.....a.-~ :i:.o~o~~ _ Q) >- Q) '0 -..1:00 l3 OO=CE 0 ;; ii ~ 8.u S! a; ..... is < a 0 0l:5 -g~'tig~~.2 O-lDJ:.....OlD 0:.2 g..Ql"O a.~ -O--J:Cm'-' ..;~g!~o_~o :! a.Cll CIlQo"O 8. .Q.s~e.o5E "5Jm(j)CIl.:!g;.. ~:53:~.Qi;1C: >:!~~"S~~ ~ -E'- ,o.a.c..... ... ... II> 0 ..; 0 .Q :I: Q) m J: Q) '= >. U'Q)Q):!>!;.! 2i2-o:50Clloc '0 i .s 01 c '8 i. 15 i ;l! :a ..w o ~ o ~ 01 C '0 01 C o o ~ o ~ g> '0 g> o lG i c::t:: '5'" w..E ~i ~ l ~ ! ~~"'1Il en c.-:~QO ~2 -g~E~~ j_~ ~ O,g = E ... "" Q) c: '" 0 >"9. ~ ~ ~~jg.g~8~ 1: i g u.5 Ol-g .e "'O~~c.5OC: '2"-Qo~~~ ' Q)Q).ml;u8."9.Efi c::S _ 0 0 Q) g- i7i ~.5 =s ~ i -g c: ai ~ ~c'2oQ)ol?ijj1i c lD is. - c: c:g "0 c: a.Eo:!=Q)CQ)= ~ !5-li.Q ~ E a.;Q ! .2aiiDOl~!5-0l3.2 .2 ijj "0 ~ 0 ai:g 8..2 ~i!5~ijjoo~ F_Oa...."O::E__ _ll]! ~~~ ~~.2 0<><0 o . ~ .2 '5';; ~ '" H~ ' c.. <; ~ o .0.,2 c: ~c.2 ~:g~~ ~ 8..!!- 5 _ 8..5 o ~ - al "; ~ ~ "9. al:g ~ ~ i!:oo- ,." 0':: Q) E.c.c c: '; 0 o " - i5:.Q~ o 0 '" s C c: ~~o E.c en a. ~ti ~ ~ ~ a o > :::l E o Q) 0 Q) c:'iu"O B-"OI :s~~~ Q) '" Q)'" s.2~8. g''O :j!E ~i :i!~ d! C.c c H~ ...< .. '0 .0 -= "zS 8-133 ! I g' '8 i. :1l ~ "':11 "!~ .... Attachment 3 ~{f? ~ '-..---------- . -- -- ---- """--~~~ CITY OF CHUlA VISTA Downtown Parking District Interim Action Plan 8-134 DOWNTOWN PARKING DISTRICT INTERIM ACTION PLAN #1 MAINTAIN THE DOWNTOWN PARKING DISTRICT Finding: The Parking District's obligations to maintain metered parking and utilize the revenue for only District expenditures ended in 1999. Many of the District's assets are in disrepair and require significant expenditure to be updated. Recommendation: Maintain the Downtown Parking District. Implement effective management and operation strategies that will result in additional revenue for capital improvements within the District. Implementation: Work with staff and the community to develop a Downtown Parking District Management Plan including a timeline for capital improvements in the District. Action Time: Fourth Quarter of 2007 #2 PARKING FUND Finding: The District has no obligation to continue to use funds generated by parking meter revenue and fines on parking-related activities (i.e. maintenance, repairs and capital improvements) within the District. Recommendation: Consistent with the Parking District Law of 1951, continue to maintain a separate fund, place all revenue generated from the Downtown Parking District into this fund, and direct that these monies only be utilized for improvements within the District. Implementation: No changes required at this time. Action Time: Third Quarter of 2007 #3 DOWNTOWN PARKING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Finding: The boundaries of the District and the in-lieu parking fee area are inconsistent and do not include enough of the area that is or may be impacted by parking issues. The Downtown Parking District needs to have the same opportunities (i.e. in lieu parking fee program) available throughout. Recommendation: Change the boundaries (E Street to the north, Del Mar to the east, Garrett to the west and H Street to the south). Implementation: In accordance with California Streets and Highways Code Section 35270, a Notice of Intention will be published, pursuant to Government Code Section 6066 in the Star News and will specify a time for hearing objections to the proposed change, which will not be less than 20 days after the first publication of the notice. A copy of the notice will also be mailed to each affected landowner. At the conclusion of the hearing, if no majority protest is on file and if all protests and objections have been overruled and denied, then the City Council may adopt an ordinance 8-135 declaring that the Parking District is formed and describing the acquisitions and improvements to be made. Action Time: First Quarter of 2008 #4 PARKING MANAGEMENT Finding: There is no single point of contact for the public or for City staff involved in parking. There are several City departments with direct or indirect involvement in parking. There should be one designated city employee to organize parking functions for the Downtown Parking District and work with the public. Recommendation: Appoint an Interim Parking Manager from existing City staff. This staff person will dedicate a portion of their time to the Parking District for at least one year. This position should be re-evaluated during the annual review period. Implementation: The City Manager will assign an Interim Parking Manager. Action Time: Third Quarter of 2007 #5 PARKING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Finding: Parking is an issue that involves the City, local organizations, downtown businesses, residents, customers and visitors. There is no formal mechanism in place that provides an opportunity for ongoing and direct input and participation in the decision-making process on Parking District- related activities. Recommendation: Form a Downtown Parking Advisory Committee (DPAC) conSisting of representatives from the downtown business community, business organizations, property owners and City staff. The PAC will advise the City Council on the development and implementation of the Downtown Parking District Management Plan and review ongoing operations. Implementation: The Interim Parking Manager will draft and present proposed selection criteria and operating guidelines for the DBAC to the City Council for consideration. Action Time: Fourth Quarter of 2007 #6 PARKING ENFORCEMENT Finding: The District requires more consistent parking enforcement. One full-time position of 40 hours per week has been funded from the Parking District Account, which is inadequate since the enforcement hours are Monday through Saturday from 9am to 5 pm, a total of 48 hours per week. Downtown businesses and organizations have expressed concern that there is not adequate enforcement in the downtown area. Recommendation: Ensure that all of the posted hours of enforcement are being actively enforced in the District. 8-136 Implementation: The Interim Parking Manager will coordinate with the Police Department to ensure coverage Monday through Saturday from 9am to 5 pm. Ongoing coordination and review will occur to determine if additional enforcement is required. The Interim Parking Manager will work with the Finance Department to ensure adequate funding for enforcement hours. Action Time: Fourth Quarter of 2007 #7 PARKING METERS AND EQUIPMENT Finding: The on-street and off-street meters need to be replaced. There are three types of meters being used in Chula Vista, with the majority of the meters more than 30 years old. There are many non-functioning meters. This causes numerous problems particularly since the public does not receive consistent or clear direction as to the regulations related to broken meters. Tickets are issued to vehicles parked at broken meters even when a note is attached to the meter stating that it is broken. This creates a sense of confusion and frustration from customers and visitors. Recommendation: The City should purchase new individual meters for on-street parking spaces and multi-space machines for public parking lots in the District. The individual and multi-space meters can accept coins, tokens and value or smart cards, making the parking transaction easier for the parker. The meters should be electronic, which will allow rates and time parameters to be more easily changed. Additionally, the reporting of income and use by each meter can be downloaded by a handheld machine which will assist in revenue analysis and accountability. Ideally, the system would also be wireless and solar powered. Implementation: Staff will prepare specifications and work with the parking equipment vendor to negotiate the purchase and installation of new individual and multi-space meters. The Parking District would borrow funds from the Redevelopment Agency and would repay the funds with Parking District revenues. Projected costs for the replacement of all the existing meters is $380,000 including installation, software and equipment. Based upon the proposed meter increases, the District should be able to repay the Agency within 2 years from the date of installation of the new meters. Action Time: Fourth Quarter of 2007 to prepare specifications First Quarter of 2008 for installation of equipment #8 PARKING METER RATES Finding: The parking rates in the Downtown District are too low. They do not deter people from parking beyond the posted time limits and do not provide the District with adequate funds to make needed repairs and improvements. Recommendation: Increase meter rates as described in the table below. From 2002-2006 the revenue from parking meters averaged $239,479.00 annually. With the proposed increase the projected revenue is estimated to increase by over $300,000 annually to over $540,000. These funds will greatly enhance the District and help create a self-sufficient and thriving Downtown Parking District. 8-137 Time Limit Current Rate Proposed Rate On-street 30 minute meter $0.05 per 10 minutes $0.25 per 30 minutes Token per 10 minutes $0.10 per 20 minutes $0.25 per 30 minutes On-street 2 and 3 hour $0.05 per 10 minutes $0.25 per 30 minutes meter Token per 10 minutes $0.50 per 60 minutes $0.10 per 20 minutes $0.25 per 50 minutes Off-street 4 hour meter $0.05 per 30 minutes $0.25 per 30 minutes $0.10 per 60 minutes $0.50 per 60 minutes $0.25 per 150 minutes Off-street 10 hour meter $0.05 per 30 minutes $0.25 per 60 minutes Token per 30 minutes $0.10 per 60 minutes $0.25 per 150 minutes Implementation: The Interim Parking Manager will initiate reVISions to Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 10.56.020 modifying the stated meter rates and providing additional language allowing further modification upon City Cou nci I approval. The Interim Parking Manager will work with other City departments, TAVA, the Chamber of Commerce and local businesses to prepare a marketing campaign advertising the parking meter increase. This information will be published in local newspapers, letters will be mailed to the area included within and directly surrounding the District, email communiques will be distributed and a Parking District website will be established. The marketing campaign will advertise the effective date of the increase at least one month ahead of implementation. Action Time: Second Quarter of 2008 #9 PARKING FINES Finding: The City's parking fines are too low and do not discourage parkers from knowingly violating parking regulations. Recommendation: Increase the expired/overtime meter fine from $12 to $25. This proposed rate increase is lower than the $50 fine recommended in the Parking Violation Penalty Schedule, prepared in 2005 by a consortium of San Diego County Cities. Staff is recommending this lower fine increase to address the fact that the current fine is too low to deter people from knowingly violating parking regulations but acknowledging the concerns voiced by businesses and property owners within the District. Implementation: The Interim Parking Manager will work with other City departments, TAVA, the Chamber of Commerce and local businesses to prepare a marketing campaign advertising the parking fine increases. This information will be published in local newspapers, letters will be mailed 8-138 to the area included within and directly surrounding the District. Email communiques will be distributed and a Parking District website will be established. The marketing campaign will advertise the effective date of the increase at least one month ahead of implementation. Action Time: Second Quarter of 2008 #10 PASEOS Finding: The paseos provide access for customers from the public parking lots to Third Avenue retail shops but many are unmarked, and require improvements such as landscaping, painting and lighting. These paseos are an integral part of the parking system, especially when downtown blocks are long. They help cut down on the distance customers and visitors have to walk to and from parking to their destination. Recommendation: Develop budget for improvements, which could be $10,000 to $100,000 depending upon the types of improvements made. Install signage to identify and direct customers to the paseos to enter Third Avenue. Make improvements to the paseos, such as murals and landscaping, to create a more inviting walking experience to and from the parking lots to businesses on Third Avenue. PBID should allocate some monies to be used for beautifying these areas since this will benefit the District as a whole. Implementation: Staff will work with TAVA and the PBID to discuss opportunities for making improvements to the paseos, including identifying funding, preparing a budget, and assigning responsibilities for the coordination, development and implementation. Action Time: First Quarter of 2008 #11 Finding: EXClUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENTS Public parking lots #3 and #6 are identified as possible development sites. Lot #3 (South Landis Avenue) has high occupancy rates, provides a large supply of parking due to larger size of the lot and is central to businesses on Landis and Third Avenue. This lot should be maintained as public parking. Lot #6 (Church and Madrona) has high occupancy but lower capacity and is hampered by difficult ingress and egress. The loss of parking on this site will have a minor impact on surrounding businesses as there are other parking areas that can make up for the loss of parking, but many surrounding businesses have expressed concern regarding the potential loss of this parking. Recommendation: Maintain Lots #3 and #6 as public parking. Implementation: On August 23, 2007, the CVRC approved new Exclusive Negotiating Agreements (ENA) to transfer the development opportunity for CityMark Development LLC from Lot #3 to Lot #2 and Voyage LLC from Lot #6 to Lot #10. Therefore, Lots #3 and #6 and will be maintained as public parking. Action Time: Third Quarter of 2007 8-139 #12 CONDUCT ANNUAL REVIEW Finding: There has been no system established to review the management and operations of the District. This has led to a lack of direction regarding how the District should function. Recommendation: Conduct an annual review and prepare a report to the City Council on the status of parking operations in the District. This report should cover income and expenses, details on number of tickets written, fees collected and accounting of funds collected from meters and permits. Implementation: The Interim Parking Manager and Parking Advisory Committee will work to establish criteria and processes for an annual review. A staff report, including a status of the previous year's activity, analysis of District performance and any recommended changes will be presented at a community meeting and to the City Council on an annual basis. Action Time: Third Quarter of every year, beginning in 2008 #13 Finding: REPORT OUT TO COMMUNITY There is public distrust about how parking funds are utilized, and there has been a lack of information shared between the City and stakeholders. There is no organized process or requirement for reporting out parking district operations to the community. Recommendation: Establish a Downtown Parking District website, linked to the City's website to provide general parking information and information specific to the District, including meter rates, parking fine rates, hours of enforcement, contact information, processes and procedures, etc. Develop a clear process to report back out to the community through established organizations such as the Third Avenue Village Association and the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce and direct contact, such as community meetings and direct mailing. Implementation: Staff will work with TAVA and the Chamber of Commerce to develop a Community Outreach Program. Staff will also create a Parking District website that will include valuable information such as contact information, meter rates, public parking area map, etc. Action Time: Fourth Quarter of 2007 8-140 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL (a) ACCEPTING THE DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY; (b) APPROVING THE DOWNTOWN PARKING INTERIM ACTION PLAN; AND (c) DIRECTING STAFF TO PREPARE A DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Downtown Parking District was established in 1963 pursuant to the Parking District Law of 1951; and WHEREAS, the Downtown Parking District provides more than 1700 public parking spaces through metered and free parking; and WHEREAS, Rich and Associates was engaged by the Redevelopment Agency to conduct a Parking Management Study and began the study process in December 2006; and WHEREAS, the Parking Management Study has been completed and the Final Report outlining the findings of the Study and providing recommendations for modifications to the District has been issued; and WHEREAS, the Parking Management Study determined that significant improvements were warranted in the management and operations of the District; and WHEREAS, a Downtown Parking Interim Action Plan has been presented outlining 13 recommendations to address those areas of management and operations of the District; and WHEREAS, the future preparation of a Downtown Parking Management Plan is necessary to provide a long-term strategy for the District; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Chula Vista City Council does hereby (a) Accept the Downtown Parking Management Study including the Final Report; (b) Approve the Downtown Parking Interim Action Plan; and (c) Direct staff to prepare a Downtown Parking Management Plan. Eric Crockett Redevelopment Manager Presented by: 8-141 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTERS 10.56 AND 10.62 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATED TO PARKING METER RATES AND OVERTIME PARKING FINES, WHEREAS, the Downtown Parking District was established in 1963 pursuant to the Parking District Law of 1951; and WHEREAS, the Downtown Parking District provides more than 1700 public parking spaces through metered and free parking; and WHEREAS, Rich and Associates was engaged by the Redevelopment Agency to conduct a Parking Management Study and began the study process in December 2006; and WHEREAS, the parking study culminated in a Final Report, which made certain findings, including that the revenue is insufficient to keep up with necessary maintenance and repairs; and WHEREAS, a Downtown Parking Interim Action Plan has been presented outlining 13 recommendations to address areas of management and operations of the District, including increasing parking meter rates and the overtime parking fine to generate additional revenue; and WHEREAS, the additional revenue generated from the increase of parking meter fees and the overtime parking fine will be utilized for parking-related expenditures within the Parking District to make the necessary improvements outlined within the Final Report. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City ofChula Vista does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 10.62, Section 10.62.010 Parking violations is amended as follows: 10.62.010 Parking violations. A. Enforcement. Every police officer and every city employee, and every volunteer (designated by the chief of police) charged with enforcement of the provisions of Chapters 10.52, 10.56 and 10.60 CVMC relating to illegal parking and time limitations in parking meter zones, the provisions of the California Vehicle Code, and the other laws of the state applicable to parking violations within the city, shall have the duty, when any 8-142 vehicle is illegally parked, to issue written notice of violation thereof stating the state vehicle license number, make of such vehicle, the time and date of such illegal parking, meter number, street location, and a reference to the appropriate section of the code and the amount of the penalty for the violation. Such notice shall be attached to said vehicle in a conspicuous place upon the vehicle so as to be easily observed by the person in charge of such vehicle upon his return thereto. B. Civil and Late Payment Penalties and Fees. For the purpose of regulating the use of streets: I. Base penalty amounts for the following Chula Vista Municipal Code violations shall be $12.00 if paid within 30 days of the notice of violation: CVMC 10.56.100; 10.56.110; 10.56.120; 10.56.140. 2. Base penalty amounts for the following Chula Vista Municipal Code violations shall be $50.00 if paid within 30 days of the notice of violation: CVMC 10.52.485. 3. Base penalty amounts for the following Chula Vista Municipal Code violations and California Vehicle Code violations shall be $25.00 if paid within 30 days of the notice of violation: CVMC 10.52.100; 10.52.110; 10.52.120; 10.52.130; 10.52.200; 10.52.210; 10.52.240; 10.52.330; 10.52.390; 10.52.420; 10.52.430; 10.52.480; 10.56.130; 10.56.310. California Vehicle Code Sections 21 13 (a); 22515; 22520. 4. Base penalty amounts for the following Chula Vista Municipal Code violations and California Vehicle Code violations shall be $35.00 if paid within 30 days of the notice of violation: CVMC 10.52.040; 10.52.060; 10.52.070 (I) - (14); 10.52.090; 10.52.150; 10.52.160; 10.52.180; 10.52.190; 10.52.230; 10.52.270; 10.52.290; 10.52.310; 10.52.360; 10.52.450; 10.60.030; 10.60.050; 10.60.060; 10.60.080; 10.60.090; 10.60.100. California Vehicle Code Sections 21211; 22500(a) - (h); 225000), (k); 22500.1; 22514; 22516; 22517. 5. Base penalty amounts for the following California Vehicle Code violations shall be $25.00. The base penalty will be reduced to $10.00 upon submission of proof of correction within the time frames specified in the Vehicle Code of the state of California: California Vehicle Code Sections 5200; 5201; 5204(a). 6. The base penalties for the following California Vehicle Code violations shall be as set forth below: California Vehicle Code Sections 4462(b) - $100.00; 22500(i) - $250.00; 22500(1) - $275.00; 22507.8 - $330.00; 22522 - $275.00; 22523 - $100.00; 22526 - $50.00. 7. The base penalties for Chula Vista Municipal Code and California Vehicle Code violations not listed above shall be $35.00 if paid within 30 days of the notice of violation, unless the penalty amount is set by the Vehicle Code of the state of California. 8-143 8. The owner or operator may mail such payments to the city's director of finance within the time established herein, but shall be responsible for delivery thereof to the office of the director of finance. 9. Late Payment Penalties. All base penalties under $250.00 listed in subsections (B)(2) through (6) of this section shall double if not paid within 30 days of the notice of violation, unless specifically restricted by the Vehicle Code of the state ofCalifomia. The penalty for violations listed in subsection (B)(I) of this section shall be $35.00 if the penalty is not paid within 30 days if the notice of violation. C. Failure to Pay. Failure to pay the appropriate penalty as provided herein or failure to contest the violation pursuant to Sections 40200.7 and 40215 SECTION II. Amend Chapter 10.56, Section 10.56.020 Meters -Installation and maintenance - Rates for Use. Tokens permitted when. as follows: Section 10.56.020 Meters - Installation and maintenance - Rates for use. The city council shall provide for the installation of parking meters including curb or street marking lines, regulation and operation thereof, and shall cause said meters to be maintained in good workable condition. Meters shall be placed upon the curb next to individual parking places and meters shall be so constructed as to display a signal showing legal parking upon deposit therein of the proper coin or coins of the United States, as indicated by instructions on said meter, and for a period of time conforming to the parking limits of the city, said signal to remain in evidence until expiration of the parking period so designated, at which time a dropping of signal or some other mechanical operation shall indicate expiration of the parking period. When any vehicle shall be parked next to a parking meter, the owner or operator of the vehicle shall park within the area designated by the curb or street marking lines as indicated for parallel or diagonal parking and, upon entering the parking space, shall immediately deposit coinage in the meter, and said parking space may be then used by such vehicle during the legal parking limit provided by the ordinances and resolutions of the city, as follows: A. Thirty minute meters - A twenty-five cent deposit for each 30 minute interval up to the maximum time limit established for the zone in which the meter is located; or B. Two, three, and four hour meters - A twenty-five cent deposit for each thirty minute interval or a fifty cent deposit for each one hour interval up to the maximum legal time limit established for the zone in which the meter is located; or C. Ten hour meters - A twenty-five cent deposit for each one hour period up to the maximum legal time limit established for the zone in which the meter is located; or 8-144 (ard. 2670,1996; ard. 2436 S 2,1991; ard. 2367 S 1, 1990; ard. 2143 S 1, 1986; ard. 955 S 3, 1965). Eric Crockett Redevelopment Manager Presented by: 8-145 S+-r\~ou-+ V~IOi\ ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTERS 10.56 AND 10.62 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATED TO PARKING METER RATES AND OVERTIME PARKING FINES, WHEREAS, the Downtown Parking District was established in 1963 pursuant to the Parking District Law of 1951; and WHEREAS, the Downtown Parking District provides more than 1700 public parking spaces through metered and free parking; and WHEREAS, Rich and Associates was engaged by the Redevelopment Agency to conduct a Parking Management Study and began the study process in December 2006; and WHEREAS, the parking study culminated in a Final Report, which made certain findings, including that the revenue is insufficient to keep up with necessary maintenance and repairs; and WHEREAS, a Downtown Parking Interim Action Plan has been presented outlining 13 recommendations to address areas of management and operations of the District, including increasing parking meter rates and the overtime parking fine to generate additional revenue; and WHEREAS, the additional revenue generated from the increase of parking meter fees and the overtime parking fine will be utilized for parking-related expenditures within the Parking District to make the necessary improvements outlined within the Final Report. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council ofthe City ofChula Vista does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 10.62, Section 10.62.010 Parking violations. is amended as follows: 10.62.010 Parking violations. A. Enforcement. Every police officer and every city employee, and every volunteer (designated by the chief of police) charged with enforcement of the provisions of Chapters 10.52, 10.56 and 10.60 CVMC relating to illegal parking and time limitations in parking meter zones, the provisions of the California Vehicle Code, and the other laws of the state applicable to parking violations within the city, shall have the duty, when any 8-146 vehicle is illegally parked, to issue written notice of violation thereof stating the state vehicle license number, make of such vehicle, the time and date of such illegal parking, meter number, street location, and a reference to the appropriate section of the code and the amount of the penalty for the violation. Such notice shall be attached to said vehicle in a conspicuous place upon the vehicle so as to be easily observed by the person in charge of such vehicle upon his return thereto. B. Civil and Late Payment Penalties and Fees. For the purpose of regulating the use of streets: 1. Base penalty amounts for the following Chula Vista Municipal Code violations shall be $12.00 if paid within 30 days of the notice of violation: CVMC 10.56.100; 10.56.110; 10.56.120; 19.56.130; 10.56.140. . 2. Base penalty amounts for the following Chula Vista Municipal Code violations shall be $50.00 if paid within 30 days of the notice of violation: CVMC 10.52.485. 3. Base penalty amounts for the following Chula Vista Municipal Code violations and California Vehicle Code violations shall be $25.00 if paid within 30 days of the notice of violation: CVMC 10.52.100; 10.52.110; 10.52.120; 10.52.130; 10.52.200; 10.52.210; 10.52.240; 10.52.330; 10.52.390; 10.52.420; 10.52.430; 10.52.480; 10.56.130: 10.56.310. California Vehicle Code Sections 2113(a); 22515; 22520. 4. Base penalty amounts for the following Chula Vista Municipal Code violations and Clwla Vista MURieiJlal Celle 10.62.919 Hl 37 (Reyised 8/06) California Vehicle Code violations shall be $35.00 if paid within 30 days of the notice of violation: CVMC 10.52.040; 10.52.060; 10.52.070 (1) - (14); 10.52.090; 10.52.150; 10.52.160; 10.52.180; 10.52.190; 10.52.230; 10.52.270; 10.52.290; 10.52.310; 10.52.360; 10.52.450; 10.60.030; 10.60.050; 10.60.060; 10.60.080; 10.60.090; 10.60.100. California Vehicle Code Sections 21211; 22500(a) - (h); 225000), (k); 22500.1; 22514; 22516; 22517. 5. Base penalty amounts for the following California Vehicle Code violations shall be $25.00. The base penalty will be reduced to $10.00 upon submission of proof of correction within the time frames specified in the Vehicle Code of the state of California: California Vehicle Code Sections 5200; 5201; 5204(a). 6. The base penalties for the following California Vehicle Code violations shall be as set forth below: California Vehicle Code Sections 4462(b) - $100.00; 22500(i) - $250.00; 22500(1) - $275.00; 22507.8 - $330.00; 22522 - $275.00; 22523 - $100.00; 22526 - $50.00. 7. The base penalties for Chula Vista Municipal Code and California Vehicle Code violations not listed above shall be $35.00 if paid within 30 days of the notice of violation, unless the penalty amount is set by the Vehicle Code of the state of California. 8-147 8. The owner or operator may mail such payments to the city's director of finance within the time established herein, but shall be responsible for delivery thereofto the office of the director of finance. 9. Late Payment Penalties. All base penalties under $250.00 listed in subsections (B)(2) through (6) of this section shall double if not paid within 30 days of the notice of violation, unless specifically restricted by the Vehicle Code of the state of California. The penalty for violations listed in subsection (B)(l) of this section shall be $35.00 if the penalty is not paid within 30 days if the notice of violation. C. Failure to Pay. Failure to pay the appropriate penalty as provided herein or failure to contest the violation pursuant to Sections 40200.7 and 40215 SECTION II. Amend Chapter 10.56, Section 10.56.020 Meters - Installation and maintenance - Rates for use. Tokens permitted when. as follows: Section 10.56.020 Meters - Installation and maintenance - Rates for use. TekeRs permittea wheR. The city council shall provide for the installation of parking meters including curb or street marking lines, regulation and operation thereof, and shall cause said meters to be maintained in good workable condition. Meters shall be placed upon the curb next to individual parking places and meters shall be so constructed as to display a signal showing legal parking upon deposit therein of the proper coin or coins of the United States, as indicated by instructions on said meter, and for a period oftime conforming to the parking limits of the city, said signal to remain in evidence until expiration of the parking period so designated, at which time a dropping of signal or some other mechanical operation shall indicate expiration of the parking period. When any vehicle shall be parked next to a parking meter, the owner or operator of the vehicle shall park within the area designated by the curb or street marking lines as indicated for parallel or diagonal parking and, upon entering the parking space, shall immediately deposit coinage in the meter, and said parking space may be then. used by such vehicle during the legal parking limit provided by the ordinances and resolutions of the city, as follows: A. Thirtv minute meters - A twentv-five cent deposit for each 30 minute interval UP to the maximum time limit established for the zone in which the meter is located.^. fi'le eem eoiR for each 19 miRute iHterval ef tile 39 minute, eRe hoar ana 1:\'0'0 hear meters; or B. Two. three. and four hour meters - A twentv-five cent deposit for each thirtv minute interval or a fifty cent deposit for each one hour interval UP to the maximum legal time limit established for the zone in which the meter is located:\ 10 eent eeiR for eaeh 20 miaute iater'o'al ef the 39 miffilte, 1 hour ana twe floar meters; or C. Ten hour meters - A twentv-five cent deposit for each one hour period UP to the maximum legal time limit established for the zone in which the meter is 10cated1\ tOR eeat 8-148 eain Jler ReW' fer eaeR feW' ReW' ami Ilille ReW' meter far the maJdmlHll legal Jlar-king time limit establishea far saia zene; or D. f. I Q eellt eein sr t..ve fiye eent eeills fsr eaeh 20 millme interval for eaeh twe heW' meter fllr the mllldmllffi legal JlBfkillg time limit establishea fer saia zelle; er B. IRlieu afthe aeJlesit sf five eent eeills hefeiRaae'le referrea te, there is sJleeitieally aIltherizeEi the use ef a tallen apJlrsl,imately the size ef a H'le eellt eaiR; the aesign ana shaJle ef sueh takeR shall Be ell file ill the effiee af the eity elerk ana sueh aesign may Be ehaRgea frem time tll time by reselmieR efthe eit)' ee_eil. Sueh tekeRs may Be JlW'ehaseEi in reasellaele affieunts frem the fillaHee effieer; F. It is oolawful ill any manner te reJlfa8uSe er ffiaIlufaetW'e sr eeunterfeit the tekeRs aescriBea iR subsectiell (II) ef this sectiall, el,eept UJleR Ylfi-tlell autherity ef the sity. It is ualll'.vful te use sr Jlsssess with the inteftt te use ill a JlBfkillg meter any slug, metal Jlieee er ether Eieyise, el,sept these tskeRs aatflerizeEi BY the sit)", whish is saJlaele ef being JiSea iR Jllase er in lieu sf a Unite a States eaill iR the Jlarkillg meters ef ChHla Vista. (Ord. 2670,1996; Ord. 2436 ~ 2,1991; Ord. 2367 ~ I, 1990; Ord. 2143 ~ 1, 1986; Ord. 955 ~ 3, 1965). Presented by: Approved as to form by: Eric Crockett Redevelopment Manager Ann Moore General Counsel 8-149