HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1992/06/02
I
". deeiare wider penalty of perjury that I am
e.-nployed by the City of Chula Vista in the
Office of the City Clark 2nd t'1:l! ! pasted
this Agen"o{:lod.;e cn ;Lc Bullet:n B~ard lI\ .
the Public' rvi es Buil:1ing and a~ Hall on
Tuesday, June 2,1992 DATED, ~""".z S'GNE06/ /~y......:;"
4:00 p,m,
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
Resmlar Meetinli[ of the Cirv of Chula Vista Cirv Council
CAll. TO ORDER
Councilmembers Grasser Horton ~ Malcolm _' Moore ~ Rindone _' and Mayor
Nader _
L
ROIl. CAIJ.:
2, PLEDGE OF AlLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, SILENT PRAYER
3, APPROVAL OF MINUfES: May 21,1992 (Regular Worksession/Meeting)
4, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY:
a, Certificate of recognition for Joyce Beardsley - The Certificate of Recognition is being
presented in appreciation and recognition of Ms, Beardsley's leadership and commitment
to excellence during the Norman Park Center renovation,
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through ll)
'I7u! staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enoJ;ted by the
Coundl by one motion wiIhout discussion unless a CounciJmember, a member of the public or City staff requests
that the item be pulkd for discussion. If you wish to spei1k 011 one of these items, please fiU out a .Retpust to
Speak Form. avaiJllble in the lobby and submit it to the CiIy Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form
to speak in favor of the staff recommendaIion; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff
recommendation.) Items pu1kd from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Action Items and Board and
Commission Recommendations. Items pu1kd by the public wiII be the fint items of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None.
6.
ORDINANCE 2516
ADOPTING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1991 EDITION AND THE
APPENDIX AND STANDARDS THERETO (second readinli[ and adoption) .
The 1991 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code shows improvement over the
1988 Edition. Language and clarification have been stressed. Three major
amendments have been added. They deal with overspill containment on
flammable liquid tanks, permitting certain above ground flammable liquid
tanks and regulating storage of empty wooden or plastic pallets. Other
proposed amendments are those that have been approved by Council over
the past seven years. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on
second reading and adoption. (Fire Chief)
Agenda
.2.
June 2, 1992
7. RESOLUTION 16645 APPROVING AND AtmiORIZING EXECUTION OF TIlE FIRSf
AMENDMENT OF TIlE EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT WITI-I
JOELEN ENTERPRISES FOR TIlE NEGOTIATION OF A DISPOSmON AND
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR A PROPOSED GOLF RESORT HOTEL -
On 4/23/91, Council directed staff to prepare an Exclusive Negotiation
Agreement (ENA) with Joelen Enterprises for development of a golf resort
hotel. Council also requested Joelen Enterprises to prepare a market
feasibility study to submit with the proposed ENA. The original deadline
of 120 days for these two items was extended by Council to November
1991. On 11/26/91, a Preliminary Market Feasibility Study was accepted
by Council and an ENA was approved. The ENA was for a period of 120
days (through 4/8/92) with the City Manager authorized to extend by 60
days. If a longer extension was found to be necessary, staff was directed
to return to Council within 60 days of the ENA's expiration. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Community
Development)
8. RESOLUTION 16646 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACf FOR OXFORD STREET
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM SECOND AVENUE TO DEL MAR
AVENUE IN TIlE CI1Y OF CHULA VISTA, CAIJFORNIA - The Director of
Public works received sealed bids on 5/6/92. The project is intended to
provide flooding relief and to extend and improve the storm drain system
on Oxford Street east of Second Avenue to Del Mar Avenue by the
installation of enforced concrete pipes and street inlets. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works and Director of
Community Development)
9. RESOLUTION 16647 APPROVING FIRSf AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITI-I TIlE
CAIJFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR INfERCHANGE
TRAFFIC SIGNALS IMPROVEMENT AT INTERSTATE ROtITE 5 AND
PALOMAR STREET AND AtmiORIZE TIlE MAYOR TO EXEClITE SAID
AGREEMENT - On 7/17/90, Council approved a cooperative agreement
with the State Department of Transportation (CalTrans) to install traffic
signals at the 1-5 and Palomar Street interchange. The improvements will
also include ramp widening and restriping. The cooperative agreement is
to terminate upon completion of the project or on 6/30/92, whichever is
earlier. Construction of the interchange signals and road work is
scheduled for early July 1992. CalTrans is requesting to extend the
expiration date of the cooperative agreement to 6/30/93 or to the
completion of the project, whichever is earlier. Staff recommends approval
of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
10. REPORT RATIFICATION OF NATURE INfERPRETIVE CENTER VOLUNTEER TO TIlE
BOARD OF DIRECfORS OF TIlE BAYFRONT CONSERVANCY TRUST - At
their meeting on 3/24/92, the Board of Directors of the Chula Vista
Bayfront Conservancy Trust created a new Board seat for a volunteer from
the Nature Center. Following Council recommendation, that member is
elected by the volunteers and ratified by the Council. At their regular
meeting on 5/16/92, the Nature Interpretive Center Volunteers elected
Docent, Susan Fuller, as their representative by a clear majority. Staff
recommends that the Council ratify the elected Docent, Susan Fuller, to
serve as the Representative of the Volunteers of the Nature Center on the
Board of Directors of the Bayfront Conservancy Trust. (Executive Director,
Bayfront Conservancy Trust)
Agenda
11.
REPORT
-3-
June 2, 1992
REQUEST FOR COUN<JL SUPPORT OF ASSEMBLY BILL 268S TO
TRANSFER EXCESS Sf ATE ROUTE 54 RIGHf-OF-WAY TO TIiE COUNaL
OF PIUPINQ-AMERlCAN ORGANIZATIONS OF SAN DIEGO COUNIY, INC.
On 5/12/92, Council considered a resolution from the Council of Pilipino-
American Organizations of San Diego County, Inc. (COPAO) requesting
Council support for Assembly Bill (AB) 2685. Sponsored by Assemblyman
Peter Chacon, this bill would transfer title to approximately 20,000 square
feet of excess State Route 54 right-of-way to COPAO for the development
of a Pilipino-American multi-cultural community center. The Council
referred the request to staff for review and report. Staff recommends that
Council support AB 2685, provided the Bill is amended to allow the site to
be used as an administrative facility for this organization. (Director of
Planning)
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
T'he following iJems have been advertised and/or posted as publii: hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak
to any item, preas" fill out the .Request to Speak Form. available in the lobby and submit it to the City C1erfc prior
to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the 9toff 1't!COIn17U11II comp1ete the pink form
to speak in opposition to the 9toff~) Comments are limiud to jive minutes J1t!T individuoL
12.
PUBUC HEARING
13.
PUBUC HEARING
TO CONSIDER REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 5.20 OF TIiE CHULA VISfA
MUMCIPAL CODE CARDROOM ORDINANCE - At the meeting of 4/28/92,
Council received a staff report and heard public testimony related to
several proposed changes on the Cardroom Ordinance. The subject
proposal was submitted by representatives of Chula Vista's cardroom
operators. As a result of that discussion, staff was directed to prepare draft
revisions of the Cardroom Ordinance for Council review and public
comment. In order to complete the report on this subject, staff
recommends that the public hearing be continued to 6123/92. (police
Chief)
REQUEST FOR A CONDmONAL USE PERMIT FOR A HEAD START CHILD
DEVELOPMENT PRESCHOOL PROGRAM AT 345 FIFTIf AVENUE IN TIiE
R-3 ZONE - Episcopal Community Services is requesting the Conditional
Use Permit in order to operate the preschool program for 124 children (62
in the a.m., 62 in the p.m.) in the existing church facility. Staff
recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. (Director of
Planning)
RESOLUTION 16648 APPROVING CONDmONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A HEAD START
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PRESCHOOL PROGRAM AT 345 FIFTIf AVENUE IN
TIiE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT
Agenda
14.
PUBUC HEARING
-4-
June 2, 1992
DRC-92-04; APPEAL OF TIiE PLANNING COMMISSION DEOSION
DENYING A FREESTANDING SIGN DESIGN FOR TIiE BUSINESS
ESTABUSHMENT AT 830 BROADWAY, PACIFIC SIGN CONSTRurnON
COMPANY - The Design Review Committee and Planning Commission
voted unanimously to deny a freestanding sign design to identify the
business establishment located at 830 Broadway. However, both the
Design Review Committee and Planning Commission approved a scale
down version of the same sign design to ensure proper addition of the
proposed freestanding sign with other signs within the immediate
commercial neighborhood. The Council considered the matter and voted
unanimously to deny the appeal and endorse the Planning Commission and
Design Review Committee action. However, the applicant did not receive
proper notification of the hearing. Consequently, the item has been
resubmitted for reconsideration. Staff recommends approval of the
resolution. (Director of Planning)
RESOL1YI10N 16649 RESONDING RESOL1YI10N NO. 16607 AND DENYING TIiE APPEAL AND
APPROVING TIiE FREESTANDING SIGN HEIGHT AND COPY AREA
RECOMMENDED BYTIiE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DESIGN REVIEW
COMMITfEE TO IDENTIFY TIiE BUSINESS ESTABUSHMENT LOCATED
AT 830 BROADWAY
15.
PUBUC HEARING
REQUEST FOR A CONDmONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A DRUG AND
ALCOHOL REHABIUTATION AND RECOVERY CENTER AT 3 NORTH
SECOND AVENUE IN TIiE R-3 ZONE - Victory Outreach wishes to operate
a drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery center for a maximum of 60
adult men. The center must be licensed by the State of California. Staff
recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. (Director of
Planning)
RESOL1YI10N 16650 GRANTING A CONDmONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A DRUG AND
ALCOHOL REHABIUTATION AND RECOVERY HOME AT 3 NORTH
SECOND AVENUE IN TIiE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportIJnity for the general publit: to address the CiJy Council on any subject matter within the Council's
jurisdiction that is not an iJem on this agenda. (SUlte law, however, generally prohibils the City Council from
taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on sw:h a
subject, ph=e complete the yeUow "Request to Speok Under Oral Communications Form" available in the lobby
and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your 1IIJnIe and address
for ret:ord purposes and foUow up action. Your tinu! is limited to three minutes per speIlker.
ArnON ITEMS
The iJems listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elit:it substlJntia/ discussions and deliberations by the
Council, staff, or members of the general publit:. The iJems will be considoed individuIlIly by the Council and staff
recommmdalions may in certain cases be presented in the a/tenUJlive. Those who wish to speak, p1eJJse fill out
a "Request to Speok" form available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Publit:
comments are limited to five minutes.
Agenda
-5-
June 2, 1992
16. RESOLImON 16598 AMENDING THE COUNCIL POllCY ON SEWER SERVICE TO PROPERlY
NOT WITHIN THE CI1Y BOUNDARY - Council Policy 570-02 was created
to allow County residents near existing City sewers who were not
contiguous to the City boundary, and thus not able to annex, to connect to
City sewers. The policy states that any County resident wishing sewer
service from a City sewer main must enter into an agreement with the City
to not sign a written protest petition, or otherwise file a formal written or
oral protest of annexation at any annexation proceedings. In a previous
action, a resident of El Rancho Vista had requested annexation and sewer
service was denied that service because the area opposed annexation. Staff
has received several requests for sewer service from County residents and,
in light of the policy and past actions, believe that the policy needs to be
reviewed. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public
Works) Continued from the meeting of 5/19/92.
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the CUy Couni:iI will consider items whid& have been forwarded to them for consideration by one
of the CUy's Boards, Commissions and/or CommiJtees.
None
ITEMS PUIJ.ED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the CUy Couni;iI will discuss items whid& have been removed from the ClHISenl Calendar_ Agenda
items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pul/ed by CounciImembers. Public
comments are limited to five minutes per individual.
OTHER BUSINESS
17. CI1YMANAGER'S REPORT(S)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
18. MAYOR'S REPORT(S)
19. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Malcolm
a. Palomar/Pacific Scene Project.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting will adjourn to a ClP Tour on Saturday, June 6, 1992 at 8:00 a.m., then to a City Council
Meeting/Budget Worksession on Tuesday, June 9, 1992 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, and
then to a Regular City Council Meeting on June 9, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, with
a Budget Session scheduled for 7:00 p.m.
A joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting will be held immediately following the City Council
meeting.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item:~
Meeting Date: 612192
ITEM TITLE:
CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION: Recognizing Joyce
Beardsley, Senior Recreation Supervisor
Commission on Agin~
SUBMITTED BY:
The Commission on Aging would like to have the City recognize Joyce Beardsley, Senior
Recreation Supervisor, for her tremendous dedication during the renovation of the Norman
Park Senior Center.
Ms. Beardsley's leadership and commitment to excellence played a vital role in this very
complex project. Her professional spirit and unwavering thoroughness were qualities that
quickly became the project's standard of measurement and accomplishment.
The City of Chula Vista owes Joyce Beardsley a heartfelt vote of thanks and gratitude. Her
dedication, patience and determination helped deliver a beautifully renovated Norman Park
Senior Center to our city that will serve our citizens for many years to come.
In light of the above, it is most fitting that the City award a "gold certificate of recognition"
to be presented to Ms. Beardsley at the Council meeting on June 2, 1992.
'It:{ - }
"'/) ,
j-
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
ITEM /1" ~
.2.57t. ME~tI~~cjA~r O~ ~/'..2.
Ordinance - Adopting tP~)~rorm Fire Code, 1991
Edition and the~t~~~a~-and Standards Thereto
Fire Chief ~~
Ci ty Manager~ ~d @I
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
At their meeting of May 11, 1992, the Board of Appeals and Advisors
recommended adoption of the Uniform Fire Code, 1991 Edition and the
Appendix and Standards, which would replace the 1988 Uniform Fire
Code, adopted by Council action on 11/15/89.
From the facts presented to the Board of Appeals and Advisors, the
Board finds that public necessity, safety, convenience and general
welfare require that the Uniform Fire Code, 1991 Edition, be
adopted by the City Council as the ordinance regulating fire and
life safety in the City.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Uniform Fire Code
in the City.
That Council adopt the 1991 Edition of the
as the ordinance regulating fire and life safety
BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADVISORS RECOMMENDATION:
adoption.
Recommends
DISCUSSION:
The 1991 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code shows improvement over
the 1988 Edition. Language and clarification have been stressed.
Three major amendments have been added. They deal with overspill
containment on flammable liquid tanks, permitting certain above
ground flammable liquid tanks and regulating storage of empty
wooden or plastic pallets. These changes are reflected in Sections
15.36.120, 15.36.130 & 15.36.150.
Additional editorial changes have been made for ease of reading by
the general public. Other proposed amendments are those that have
been approved by City Council over the past seven years.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
n ~-J
F'I A. s ,...
AEA tUN Go-
5- ;2.(, - 92-
SECOND
READING AN
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA D ADoPTION
REPEALING EXISTING CHAPTER 15.36 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER
15.36 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE,
H-&& 1991 EDITION, WITH CERTAIN DESIGNATED
MODIFICATIONS.
ORDINANCE NO. ,;z5/~
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. That existing Chapter 15.36 is hereby repealed,
and a new Chapter 15.36 of the Chula vista Municipal Code is hereby
added, which Chapter shall read as follows:
"
Section 15.36.010.
section 15.36.020
Section 15.36.030
Section 15.36.040
Section 15.36.050
Section 15.36.060
Section 15.36.070
Section 15.36.080
Section 15.36.090
1991ufc1.wp
May 19, 1992
Chapter 15.36
Uniform Fire Code as Amended~
uniform Fire Code, H-&& 1991 Edition, Adopted
by reference.
Section 10.203 amended to require "fire lanes"
in addition to fire apparatus access roads at
the option of the Fire Chief.
Section 10.403 amended to require the
installation of fire hydrants prior to certain
construction.
Section 10.506 amended to require fire-
extinguishing systems to be installed by a
state-licensed contractor.
section 10.507 amended to require installation
of automatic fire-extinguishing systems in
buildings over 40 feet or consisting of four
or more stories.
Section 10.507(h) amended to require automatic
fire-extinguishing systems for all buildings
constructed after July 1, 1992 on Group R,
Division 1 occupancy lots.
Section 10.509(a) amended
existence of electrical
constitute a sole basis
sprinklers.
Table 10. 510-A ("Standpipe Requirements")
amended to reduce the m~n~mum height of
buildings in the Group 2 Occupancy category.
Section 14.103(a) amended to require fire
alarm system plans to identify the licensed
installer.
to permit the
equipment to
for omitting
Fire Code with Local Amendments
Page 1
~-I
section 15.36.100. section 14.104(g) (1) amended to require that
if a fire alarm system is to be installed, all
new construction, regardless of height, should
be included.
section 15.36.110 Table 32.105-A amended to increase the minimum
fire access roadway width to 20 feet
regardless of floor area.
section 15.36.120 section 79.115(b) amended to require a 20
gallon minimum overspill device on certain
designated tanks.
section 15.36.130 section 79.501 amended to permit above ground
outside storage of designated liquids under
prescribed conditions.
section 15.36.140. section 80.107 amended to require hazardous
identification signs regardless of quantity.
section 15.36.150. section 81.112 added to regulate pallet
storage.
section 15.36.010.
Adopted by reference.
Uniform Fire Code, H&3- 1991 Edition,
There is hereby adopted by reference that certain document
known and designated as the Uniform Fire Code, and the .'.ppcfldil! all
Appendices, H&3- 1991 Edition, as compiled and published by the
International Conference of Building Officials and the Western Fire
Chiefs' Association ("UFC"l, three (3) copies of which are on file
in the office of the city Clerk. Said document is hereby adopted
prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and
property from fire or explosion, and each and all such regulations,
provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of said Uniform Fire
Code are hereby referred to, adopted and made a part hereof as
though fully set forth herein, excepting such portions as are
hereinafter deleted, modified or amended as set forth in Ccctisfls
5.36.828 throu~h 15.36.158 in this Chapter.
section 15.36.020. section 10.203 amended to require "fire
lanes" in addition to fire apparatus access roads at the option of
the Fire Chief.
The first full paragraph of section 10.203 ("Required Access")
of Article 10, Division II, of the UFC, as it applies in the City
of Chula Vista, is hereby amended to read as follows, all other
parts of said section to remain the same as in the UFC:
Fire apparatus access roads andfeF. at the option of the Fire
Chief. fire lanes shall be provided for every facility,
building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or
moved into or within the jurisdiction when any portion of the
facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story
of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire
1991ufcl. wp
May 19, 1992
Fire Code with Local Amendments
Page 2
6-1.
apparatus access as measured by an apf,roved route around the
exterior of the building or facility.Y
y
section 15.36.030. section 10.403 amended to require the
installation of fire hydrants prior to certain construction.
section 10.403 ("Fire Hydrants") of Article 10, Division IV,
of the UFC, as it applies in the city of Chula Vista, is hereby
amended to read as follows:
The location, number and type of fire hydrants connected to a
water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow
shall be provided on the public street or on the site of the
premises or both to be protected as required and approved by
the chief. Fire hydrants shall be accessible to the fire
department apparatus by roads meeting the requirements of
Division II.
For fire safety during construction, alteration or demolition
of a building, see section 87.103(c).
(a) Fire hydrants, where required in all subdivisions,
apartment complexes, commercial developments, etc., shall be
installed in an operable condition prior to any combustible
construction materials being placed on the site.
(b) Whenever any combustible material is placed on the site
or any work is being done contrary to the provisions of this
code, the Chief may order the said material removed from the
site or the work stopped by notice in writing served on the
owner or agent, and any such persons shall forthwith compll
with said notice until authorized by the Chief to proceed.~
section 15.36.040.
extinguishing systems
contractor.
section 10.506 amended to require fire-
to be installed by a state-licensed
Subsection (c) is hereby added to section 10.506 ("General
1. This section is the same as the current section 15.36.020.
2. Our old section 15.36.030,
require a pre-fire and emergency
into the 1991 UFC, Article 80.
giving the Chief the power to
plans, has now been incorporated
3. Different from the UFC, but not different from current text.
See the current section 15.36.035.
1991ufc1.wp
May 19, 1992
Fire Code with Local Amendments
Page 3
!/"T
provisions for Fire-extinguishing Systems") of Article 10, Division
v, of the UFC, as it applies in the City of Chu1a Vista, which
subsection (c) shall read as follows:
(c) All fire extinguishing systems shall be installed by a
state licensed a~eBey contractor.Y
EXCEPTION: When approved by the Fire Chief. R-3
occupancies may be exempted from this reauirement.
section
installation
over 40 feet
15.36.050. section 10.507 amended
of automatic fire-extinguishing systems
or consisting of four or more stories.
to require
in buildings
Paragraph 5 is hereby added to Subsection (b) of section
10.507 ("Required Installations of Automatic Fire-extinguishing
systems") of Article 10, Division V, of the UFC, as it applies in
the City of Chula Vista, which Paragraph 5 shall read as follows,
all other parts of said section to remain the same as in the UFC,
except as herein provided :
5. In every building regardless of occupancy classification
or type of construction, when such building is more than 40
feet or four stories or more in height.~
section 15.36.060. section 10.507(h) amended to require
automatic fire-extinguishing systems for all buildings constructed
after July 1, 1992 on Group R, Division 1 occupancy lots.
section 10.507 (h) ("Group R, Division 1 Occupancies") of
Article 10, Division V, of the UFC, as it applies in the City of
Chula Vista, is hereby amended to read as follows:
(h) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic
sprinkler system shall be installed throughout apartment
houses three or more stories in height or containing 16 or
more dwelling units, in congregate residences three or more
stories in height and having an occupant load of 50 or more,
and in hotels three or more stories in height or containing 20
or more guest rooms.
When an approved fire sprinkler system is required by the
provisions of this section, any and all buildinas constructed
after JulY 1. 1992. on the same property. reaardless of heiaht
4. This is essentially the same as the current section 15.36.040,
but bolded to show difference from the UFC.
5. Same as current section 15.36.045.
1991ufc1.wp
May 19, 1992
Fire Code with Local Amendments
Page 4
I-If
or number of dwellinq units. shall be provided with an
approved fire sprinkler system.
Residential or
shall be used in the
the buildinq. fl./
quick-response standard sprinkler heads
dwellinq units and quest room portions of
section 15.36.070.
existence of electrical
omitting sprinklers.
section 10.509(a) amended to permit the
equipment to constitute a sole basis for
section 10.509(a) of Article 10, Division V, of the UFC, as it
applies in the City of Chula Vista, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
(a) When sprinklers are considered undesirable because of
the nature of the contents or in rooms or areas which are of
noncombustible construction with wholly noncombustible con-
tents and which are not exposed by other areas. Sprinklers
shall not be omitted from any room merely because it is damp,
or of fire-resistive construction OF eontaino electrical
equipment.
section 15.36.080. Table 10.510-A ("Standpipe Requirements")
amended to reduce the minimum height of buildings in the Group 2
Occupancy category.
The category of group 2, under the column labeled "Occupancy",
of Table 10.510-A of Article 10, Division V, of the UFC, as it
applies in the City of Chula Vista, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
2. Occupancies 4 3 stories or
more but less than 150 feet
in heiqht, except Group R,
Div. 3I/
section 15.36.090. section 14.103(a) amended to require fire
alarm system plans to identify the licensed installer.
Subsection (a) ("Plans and Specifications") of Section 14.103
("General") of Article 14 (Fire Alarm Systems") of the UFC, as it
applies in the city of Chula vista, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
6. See current section 15.36.050.
7. Same as in our current section 15.36.055.
1991ufcl. wp
May 19, 1992
Fire Code with Local Amendments
Page 5
1J-.1
(a) Plans and Specifications. Complete plans and specifica-
tions for fire alarm systems shall be submitted for review and
approval prior to system installation. Plans and specifica-
tion shall include, but not be limited to, name, address,
telephone and license number of installing licensed contrac-
tor, a floor plan, location of all alarm-initiating and alarm-
signaling devices, alarm control- and trouble-signaling
equipment, annunciation, power connection, battery
calculations, wiring type and sizes.
section 15.36.100. section 14.104(g) (1) amended to require
that if a fire alarm system is to be installed, all new construc-
tion, regardless of height, should be included.
The first full paragraph of Subparagraph (1) ("General") of
Subsection (g) ("Group R. Division 1 Occupancies") of section
14.104 ("Required Installations") of Article 14 (Fire Alarm
Systems") of the UFC, as it applies in the City of Chula Vista, is
hereby amended to read as follows, all other provisions of said
Subparagraph (1), including the Exceptions contained therein, to
remain the same:
(g) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. 1. General. Group R,
Division 1 Occupancies shall be provided with a manual and
automatic fire alarm system in apartment houses three or more
stories in height or containing 16 or more dwelling units, in
hotels three or more stories in height or containing 20 or
more guest rooms, and in congregate residences three or more
stories in height or having an occupant load of 20 or more.
A fire alarm and communication system shall be provided in
Group R, Division 1 Occupancies located in a high-rise
building as set forth in the Building Code. When an approved
fire alarm system is required by the provisions of this
section, any and all buildings constructed after the July 1,
1992, on the same property, regardless of size or height,
shall be provided with an approved fire alarm system.@/
section 15.36.110. Table 32.105-A amended to increase the
minimum fire access roadway width to 20 feet regardless of floor
area.
The Minimum Fire Access Roadway Widths, as shown in the third
column of Table 32.105-A ("Location, Access and Parking for Tents,
Canopies and Temporary Membrane Structures") of Article 32 of the
UFC, as it applies in the city of Chula vista, is hereby amended to
read as follows:
8. Same as in our current section 15.36.065, but bolded to show
difference from UFC.
1991ufc1.wp
May 19, 1992
Fire Code with Local Amendments
Page 6
t--'
~ 20
20
~ 20
feet
feet
feet
Section 15.36.120. Section 79.115(b) amended to require a 20
gallon minimum overspill device on certain designated tanks.
Subsection (b) ("spill control") of section 79.115 ("Spill
Control, Drainage control and Secondary containment") of Article 79
("Flammable and Combustible Liquids"), Division 1 ("General") of
the UFC, as it applies in the city of Chula Vista, is hereby
amended to read as follows:
(b) Spill Control. When spill control is required, floors of
rooms, buildings or areas containing flammable or combustible
liquids shall be recessed a minimum of 4 inches or shall be
provided with a liquid-tight, raised sill to a minimum height
of 4 inches so as to prevent the flow of liquids to adjoining
area. When raised sills are provided, they are not required
at perimeter openings which are provided with an open grate
trench across the opening that connects to an approved
drainage control system. A 20 qallon minimum overspill device
is reauired on all Class I or II underaround or above around
flammable liauid tanks.
section 15.36.130.
ground outside storage
conditions.
section 79.501 amended to permit above
of designated liquids under prescribed
section 79.501 ("General") of Article
("Stationary Tank Storage, Aboveground, outside
the UFC, as it applies in the city of Chula
amended to read as follows:
79, Division V
of Buildings") of
Vista, is hereby
Storage of Class I and Class II liquids in aboveground tanks
outside of buildings is prohibited within the limits estab-
lished by law as the limits of districts in which such storage
is prohibited.
EXCEPTION: with the approval of the Fire Chief.
Class I and II liauids may be stored above qround outside
of buildinqs in specially desiqned. approved and listed
containers which have features incorporated into their
desiqn which mitiqate concerns for exposure to heat Itwo-
hour fire resistance), ianition sources and mechanical
damaqe. containers must be installed and used in
accordance with their listina, and provisions must be
made for leak and spill containment. Storaae in such
tanks on any site shall not exceed 550 aallons for Class
I or 1100 qallons for Class II liquids. The Chief may
1991ufc1.wp
May 19, 1992
Fire Code with Local Amendments
Page 7
6.,
disapprove the installation of such containers when in
his/her opinion. their use presents a risk to life or
propertv. In no case. shall such storaqe be permitted
within 100 feet of anv residential or institutional
structure.
section 15.36.140. section 80.107 amended to require
hazardous identification signs regardless of quantity.
The first full paragraph of section 80.107 ("Identification
Signs") of Article 80 ("Hazardous Materials"), Division 1
("General") of the UFC, as it applies in the city of Chula Vista,
is hereby amended to read as follows, all other provisions and
exceptions of said section to remain the same as in the UFC:
Visible hazard identification signs as specified in U.F.C.
Uniform Fire Code Standard No. 79-3 shall be placed at
entrances to locations where hazardous materials are stored,
dispensed or handled iR quaRtities LeqaiLiR~ a permit. Signs
shall be provided at specific entrances designated by the
chief. Identification siqns shall conform to NFPA 704.
section 15.36.150.
storage.
section 81.112 added to regulate pallet
A new section, to be number and titled "section 81.112.
Storage of Empty Wooden or Plastic Pallets" is hereby added to
Article 81 ("High-Piled Combustible storage") of the UFC, as it
applies in the city of Chula vista, which section shall read as
follows:
Sec. 81.112 Storaqe of Emptv Wooden or Plastic Pallets. (al
Outdoor storaqe. Pallets shall be stored outside of a
buildinq or in a detached buildinq whenever possible. Pallets
shall not be stacked closer than 5 feet from the buildinq.
(blIndoor Storaqe. Pallets when stored indoors shall be
protected with sprinklers in accordance with NFPA Standard
231. Table 4-4.1.1 unless both of the followinq conditions are
met:
Chief
1.
2.
feet.
stacks shall be
east 8 feet of
1991ufc1. wp
May 19, 1992
Fire Code with Local Amendments
Page 8
6-8
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 7
Meeting Date 06/02/92
SUBMITTED BY:
Resolution /~~ Y> Approving and authorizing execution
of the attached first amendment to the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement
with Joelen Enterprises for the negotiation of a Disposition and
Development Agreement for a proposed golf resort hotel
Community Development Director ( ?l,
City Manage0r'
II (4/Sths Vote: Yes No..xJ
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
In June 1990, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for development of City-owned
property adjacent to the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course in the 4400 block of Bonita Road.
Six proposals were received with two subsequently withdrawn. On April 23, 1991, Council
directed staff to prepare an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with Joelen Enterprises for
development of a golf resort hotel.
Council also requested Joelen Enterprises to prepare a market feasibility study to submit with
the proposed ENA. The original deadline of 120 days for these two items was extended by
Council to November 1991. On November 26, 1991, a Preliminary Market Feasibility Study
was accepted by Council and an ENA was approved. The ENA was for a period of 120 days
(through April 8, 1992) with the City Manager authorized to extend by 60 days. If a longer
extension were found to be necessary, staff was directed to return to Council within 60 days of
the ENA'S expiration.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that Council approve the resolution extending
the ENA with Joelen Enterprises for a period of 180 days.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Proiect Status
The tasks required to be completed by Joelen Enterprises under the existing ENA and their status
are delineated below:
?-I
Due Date
Page 2, Item 7
Meeting Date 06/02/92
~
11/26/91 Submitted (attached)
3/9/92 Submitted (attached)
3/9/92 Submitted
4/8/92 Outstanding
4/8/92 Submitted (attached)
1. Preliminary market study
2. Memorandum of Understanding with
American Golf Corp.
3. Preliminary Site Plan
4. Project Feasibility Study/Pro Forma
5. Initial Study Application & Deposit
The one outstanding task is the comprehensive feasibility/pro forma analysis. However, it is
proposed that the deadline for this task be revised and designated in the extended ENA period
pending further environmental studies and project refinement.
The project's Initial Study application has been reviewed by pertinent City departments. Various
issues have been raised that will require specific studies, including traffic, flooding and noise.
Staff is currently evaluating the need for an EIR to be conducted. The project's Pro Forma
analysis will need to incorporate both the costs of the studies ultimately required and the costs
of the resulting mitigations. However, Joelen Enterprises will be required to provide a
Preliminary Income and Expenses Pro Forma analysis (the market study was Phase 1) by August
1992, and the final comprehensive feasibility analysis upon completion of all environmental
studies.
Extended ENA
It is important to note that Joelen Enterprises has authorized the City to proceed with hiring a
consultant to conduct the required traffic study which will address ingress and egress issues
including the impact upon the Otay Road and Bonita Road intersection, as well as parking issues
relating to the hotel, golf course, and joggers. Additionally, Joelen has executed a contract with
Rick Engineering to conduct the topographical survey to identify flood elevations. These two
studies are key to determining environmental mitigations and related costs, and therefore project
feasibility .
FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the extended ENA will have no direct fiscal impact on the
City other than the continued cost of staff time to administer the ENA and negotiate related
agreements (lease, Disposition and Development Agreement, etc.). Previous analysis estimates
that the project ultimately will generate approximately $1,000,000 per year in Transit Occupancy
Taxes, lease payments, percentage operating revenues, and property taxes.
[C:IWP51ICOUNCD..1113S\10ELEN-2.113]
?...~
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND
JOELEN ENTERPRISES FOR NEGOTIATION TOWARDS A
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR A
PROPOSED GOLF RESORT HOTEL
This agreement hereby extends the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) between
the City of Chula Vista and Joelen Enterprises dated November 26, 1991, for an additional 180
days from Council approval by resolution of the amendment.
During the term of the extended 180 day ENA, the following tasks shall be negotiated
and completed by Joelen Enterprises within the timeframes specified:
Task
1. Topographic Survey
2. Traffic Study
3. Air and Noise Studies
4. Master Plan for Golf Course and
Hotel, Including Identification
of Golf Course Improvements
5. Preliminary Income and Expense
Pro Forma
6. Drainage Study
7. Identification of Historical
Artifacts Space
8. Revised Site Plan, showing architectural
design, traffic circulation, on- and
off-site improvements, parking and
jogging trails
9. Agreement between American Golf Corp.
and Joelen Enterprises including
policy regarding available golf times
10. Lease Agreement between City and
Joelen Enterprises
11. Financing Income and Expense Pro Forma
12. Project Development Schedule and
Identification of Financing Source
1
?'J
Due Date
July 10, 1991
July 10, 1991
August 31, 1991
August 31, 1991
August 31, 1991
September 30, 1990
September 30, 1990
October 30, 1991
October 30, 1991
November 30, 1991
November 30, 1991
November 30, 1991
MAY-28-92 THU 15:38
P.03
HAV-28-92 THU 14:27
CONIIUNITV DEVElOPMEN1
FA~ NO. 6194765310
P.03
The timefrao1es spedfled repteselIt reasonable estimateS of feasible completion dates,
but may be revised upon City smff anthorl7.a.lion to reflect ch31l8ing needS.
Except as specifically antended. all otha rerms and conditions .\tall remal.n the same
and In fun force and effect.
In witness wheICiOf. Agency and roelen EnterpriseS have c:lteCUted this Amendment 10
the ()ri&idal A.pement tbll1J\d day of lUllS 1992.
TIm ClTY OF CBULA VIS'l'A
Dam:
Tint Nader, Mayor
Attest:
Beverly Authelet, City CleI:k
Approved u to lonn:
Btuee M. Boogaard
City Attorney
10ELEN EN'I':ERPRISES
Date:
tJbIf 5J.~. HI:Y
~~?- fi"j.g,
plWl/$IICONIJlACJ:\IOIlUlK-2.CI'IIJ
:a
7~o/ /7-'
MAV-2B-92 THU 14:27
COl1l1UHITV DEVELOPMEMT
FAX NO. 6194765310
P.04
P.04
M~Y-2e-92 THU, 15:39
THE em OF CllVlA VISTA pAlffY DISCLOSURB STATEYENT
Statement ot clisc1olIw:e of cerlain ownE!:tship inhlres15. paymel\ts. or campaigl\ contributions. 01\ all JDlltIe:rs
whiCh will require discredonatY action 011 the patt of the City eouncll. Planning Commission, and all other
ofliciul bodies. The following info1'llll1tion must be disclosed:
1. Ust the names of all persons having l financial interest bt the contract. i.e., contractor. subcontractor,
materia147P~ f ~- ~. ~~.
Z. If any person idenl:ifi.ed purs1WIt to (1) above is a corporntion or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning maIO tbmllO% of the shares In the c:oqlOtllIion or owning any partnership interest
InJhe ~!d17._ r:- ' - I - - '- '
-(f<1"'if~ ~ ~'1~ ~ "'i.)~ L.V R-f-P.)
~
3. If llJIY person identified punuant In (1) above is non-ptofit Otla.o.ization ox a trust,. n,t the name! of any
person servina as director of the l\On-pxofit orJRllimtion or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the
Imst. JLJ1.
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of b\l$iness tranSaCted with any member of the City staff. Boards,
Com~ssiOl1S' Committees and 0lunci1 within the past twd,vc months' Yea_
No If yes, please indicate penon(s):
S. please identify each iI1d cwty pdllon, including any qe.nts. employeeJ, consultants or independent
col\llaclot~ !f.ho you have assI&oed to represent yoll before the City in this matter.
IIl-flhP
6. Rave you and/or y()l,lt officerS or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Counci1membet'in the current or pteeedil1g election period? Yes _ NO"X:- If yes, Slate which
Counci1m.embet(s):
~ it defiD'Oll u! 'AIlJl in4/144IU1l. jlrm, mporlner.Jrlp, J<>lnl wmtlR'f. /lSloclalion, ,ocial dub, fralllI'Ml orgM0Ulon.
cmpol'dlfOll, .'01., 1rIU1.~, ondlCOlIt.thisandoft1 oIhuCIIl/llty, d/yantl/lOUllh)'. diy, numIdpalJIy, rI1nrla ",utherpoUrlad
I~VI"Cff. or' IIIq tJI1ur FJIIp lI' mmbllltlllon -.., M ,. ....II..
'satrI s;..,y ~Rt'iCiJ~s
.
:: 7!/!;t;~~
S' Ilatll contractorfapp .
-;Msd 4-. (?; rtrDA J .
Prlnt or type name of conlr.K:toI/ailplicant
[Royl"'!, llf1OM)J
[CI\WP.ll\COUNCILIDtseLO&ll:l'X'l'I
?--f
Joe{en rr,nterprises
May 21, 1992
Ms. Cheryl Dye
Community Development Department
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
re: Bonita Golf Lodge, Update
Dear Cheryl:
This letter is for your information and to update our situation and pro-
gress on the above-captioned project.
As you know, flu, pneumonia and more recently a hospital operation
took about a 60 day chunk out of our fIrst quarter this year but fortunately,
we're back on the job again, and anxious to recapture our operating
rhythm.
TRAFFIC STUDY:
We have previously notifIed you to authorize the requested traffIc study
for the project. We will be very interested in seeing what they come up
with, and particularly interested in hearing what they will have to say re-
garding the impact of the potential aspect of relocating the main hotel en-
trance to the intersection of Bonita and Otay Lakes Road.
May we request that in order that the study address as closely as possi-
ble the actual intended improvements and uses for the property, you set up
a meeting for us between the actual individuals who will be conducting the
study and ourselves, including your people. We would hope that this meet-
ing could be held sometime this coming week. before they start work.
FIELD ENGINEERING AND TOPOGRAPHICAL STUDY:
Last week a fInal meeting was held between ourselves and project en-
gineers at Rick Engineering to set up the process by which the above-
captioned can be accomplished. Last Tuesday an on-site meeting was held
that was also attended by Lance Abbott, and later by Rick Crochet. manag-
er of the golf course for American Golf. Final instructions were issued to
the engineers and Lance was able to personally ascertain that the parame-
ters of the fInal job would satisfy the City as well as ourselves.
4000 Coronado Bay Road . Coronado, CA . (619) 424-4474 . FAX 423-0884
7~7
Cheryl Dye
Bonita Golf Lodge Update
May21,1992
Page 2 of 4
We have forwarded a copy to you of our signed contract with Rick Engi-
neering to do the required work. In order to not to deleteriously impact the
operation of the course and scheduling of tournaments, etc., I instructed
the engineers from Rick to collaborate with the course manager on the tim-
ing and placement of laying out the aerial markers for the aircraft to target
on for flying the topographical survey base material. With luck, they may
have a couple of week-days of clear weather in between tournaments and
group play during which they can accomplish the first phase of the work.
The rest of the work is done in their office and is not dependent on the
weather or the golf course operations. We will keep you apprised of their
progress.
DESIGN STUDIES:
We have been continuing to study and gather input for our fmal designs
and layout for the project. As we have pointed out to you, these will be
mostly dependent on what the market is for this type of improvement. As
you may recall, our Initial Proposal lIP) submitted in August of 1990 in re-
sponse to the Citys' Request for Proposal (RFP) contained projected figures
for the hotels' Average Daily Rate per room (ADR) and some cost and in-
come projections, including a projection of the income to the City from our
project.
The projected income to the City, figured from stabilized occupancy at
year four as: a starting annual total from that time of $1,248,618.00 gener-
ated by $586,531 in Transit Occupancy Taxes plus $662,087.00 in lease
payments figured on percentages of gross departmental income. As the
hotel continues in operation and becomes known in the market-place, that
figure can very reasonably be expected to increase.
I need not point out that there have been enormous changes in the real
estate and financial markets since that date. These are bound to have an
effect on our figures but, as I am in the habit of keeping my projections ex-
tremely conservative, the actual changes may not be all that great when the
time comes, especially as we are now planning 250 rooms. In fact, we have
received some input from very reliable sources indicating that our initial
estimate of ADR may have been too conservative.
Our initial approach was to try to keep the ADR in the $95-100.00 per
room/night range. Subsequent input from some of our contacts in the
industry, -specifically heads of upscale group-booking organizations- has
suggested that that price might send an "incorrect message" about what we
have built to the group market we intend to attract and that we should aim
for a $120.00 ADR. As that part of our market is projected to be at least
65% of our business, (in fact it's a pretty standard percentage throughout
San Diego), that must be a good part of our focus.
7" 8'"
Cheryl Dye
Bonita Golf Lodge Update
May21.1992
Page 3 of 4
However, we certainly cannot overlook the 35% of our market that is the
Frequent Individual Traveler (FIT) plus the local business. The question is,
is say a $120.00 room/night ADR a realistic number for Chula Vista? (I
must also mention that all the hotel people we are talking to are not famil-
iar with Chula Vista. Also, that is a rather basic question we'll have to
handle nationally, and in some part even in Southern California: "where
{and what} is Chula Vista?")
Don't forget that in order to attain a given ADR. many guests will be
paying above as well as below that number. Using our Coronado resort as
an example, during planning in 1984 I had initially projected a $134.00
ADR. Doing the final projections for our investors/lenders in 1987 I pro-
jected a $161.00 ADR for 1991-92. (We also must not overlook the large
part inflation -or the lack of it- plays in planning and results.)
Our first full calendar year in Coronado is 1992, and we are at this time
very fortunate to be experiencing a $162.00 ADR. Our present ~ rate
however, (what you are quoted when you call or walk in a hotel) is $180.00
single and $200.00 double. And our local "advertised special rate" (subject
to availability, holidays, etc.) is $129.00. Of course you can also pay up to
$1150.00 a night for some of our suites. (Yes, we do actually get that from
some individuals and businesses.) You also might be interested to know
that some of the highest room rates that we get is from some of our groups.
It must be obvious that these are all factors that must be taken into
consideration in the design of a hotel that is to be economically successful.
And they are only a few of the many components that must be factored in.
Which leads into our next topic:
FEASIBILITY STUDY:
The initial study, which was given to you, gave PKFs' opinion that gen-
erally our planned idea for the project on Bonita Road was feasible. I know
that your department and the City Council wishes us to contract for a fur-
ther study soon on this subject. Our opinion is that it would be premature.
Certainly we can authorize further reports on the subject -PKF would be
only too glad to take our money. But we will have only a budgeted amount
to spend on this item overall. and it would be a shame to waste a substan-
tial part of it now. As you know, we initially told you we felt we needed to
get through the complete negotiating process with the City on the basic
authorization for the project, the requirements as to parking, density, and
height, etc., plus the fees, first. I feel we are getting close to that point now.
Following this, we would authorize further design studies on site plan-
ning, architecture and landscaping, meanwhile personally conducting stud-
ies in depth on the market, available business, and comparable properties.
To do the latter will entail a minimum of 3-4 months of off-and-on travel to
what our primary sources of business will see as their "alternate destina-
tions" to our resort,
7''1
Cheryl Dye
Bonita Golf Lodge Update
May21.1992
Page 4 of 4
in other words , our local and national competition. Our experience has shown us that this is
what gives us a unique edge, our personal knowledge of what else is out there -and not out
there- for our potential guests, what's been done right (and wrong), what the comparable
values are, what travel is involved in getting there compared to Chula Vista, what would en-
tice the guests at these places to come to our resort, and much, much more, Our greatest
gift is being able to translate all this into a finished product, -the right product for the right
price in the right place at the right time,
Armed with this information then, and only then, can we properly in-
struct the feasibility/market study people about what they are working on
and with, and exactly what we need for them to confirm or affirm to the
City that they consider will work on Bonita Road, and at what occupancies
and room-rates, On the other hand, the generic information about the
business in general, (which is all we'd ,get with what we have now), is alrea-
dy available to us in the annual hote[business condition report done by
PKF. Another thing is that, especially in todays' volatile market, this report
must be as current as possible, Consider that the next report, if done to-
day, is forecasting what will be happening to us in business in the 1995-
2005 market. Even the report we'If need done when all our basic plans,
budgets and marketing is complete will have to be further updated for the
lender before they'll start funding construction. We ask rou to please con-
sider what the City is asking in this department in light 0 the above.
Meanwhile, we are continuing our studies, meetings, preliminary design
discussions and contacts in both our marketing and potential financing
areas. Of course we remain in constant contact with Kawasaki Steel and
our Japanese bank. Lenore has kept close touch with our bank officials
there. So far, they both continue to express willingness to consider doing
the project with us, in spite of the present market conditions, because of
our outstanding success with our current project with them. We have been
told by independent Japanese sources that we are known in many Ja-
panese business circles for our accomplishments in Coronado. It still
somewhat surprises us to hear we've become a mini-legend in this business
for doing just what we do naturally!
In any event, we see it as a very positive factor in making us one of the
few viable entities to be able to do a project such as the Bonita Grand Golf
Lodge at this time.
We again express our thanks to you, Lance, Chris and the others in
your department for your work and support on behalf of the project,
c:\ws\bonita\5updteI21
7-/(1
. -"'--.:-
.~
"
,',
,',
,',
,! .
AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION"
April 7, 1992
Mr. Josef citron
Joelen Enterprises
5000 Coronado Bay Road
Coronado, California 92118
Re: Memorandum of Understanding
Dear Josef:
The purpose of this ("Memorandum of Understanding") is to draw
the outline of the general terms and conditions within which Joelen
Enterprises and American Golf Corporation ("AGC") will form a
partnership for the development tentatively named the Bonita Grand
Golf Resort that has been proposed to the City of Chula vista.
This partnership is intended to consist of Joelen Enterprises, AGC
and an equity partner yet to be determined.
As part of this transaction, Joelen Enterprises has agreed to
contribute their 3~ acre leasehold interest which will be
negotiated with the city, the entitlement work, planning and design
and construction of the finished hotel. AGC shall contribute their
leasehold interest in the 4~ acres with the existing clubhouse and
parking lot and their expertise in the sports and fitness fields.
AGC is also amenable to expanding this contribution by 2~
addi~ional acres, which may require relocating and re-designing the
18th hole. It is also understood that AGC will use this project
to amend their existing lease with the City to match the lease term
of the hotel.
Joelen Enterprises and AGC have agreed that the lease term of
the 4~ acres must match that of the 3 1/2 acres and that AGC will
negotiate the lease on the entire golf course to be for the same
lease term. The specific terms of the partnership and an operating
agreement that provides for hotel guests access to the golf course
will be established concurrent with the negotiations for the
development agreement between Joelen and the city. The operating
agreement will allow a guaranteed minimum amount of starting times
for residents.
7-11
NDV-20-.91 WED 15:21
()
\_-
t.r'\
i~__}
JOELEN ENTERPlUSES
PIlASE I LETTER REPORT
ON THE PRELlMINARY ANALYSIS
OF THE POTEN'l'IAL MARKET SUPPORT
FOR THE PROPOSED
BONITA GRANDE GOLF RESORT
TO BE LOCATED IN
CHULA VISTA, CAlJFORNIA
NOVEMBER, 1991
7.../~
PANNELL
KERR
F.RSTRR
P. 02
NOV-20-91 WED 15:22
~)
"
'\
r
I. )
P.03
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
CertIfled PublIc Accounlan13
November 21, 1991
750 II Street
Suite 2080
San Oiel/<l, GA 92101
Telcphooo (8fS) 233-'2698
Tol<>tox 819-2S3-f:!OO
Josef and Lenore Citron
Partners
JoeIen Enterprises
5000 Coronado Bay Road
Coronado, CA 92118
Dear Mr. & Mrs_ Citron:
We have completed our Phase l research and analysis of the potential market support for
the proposed Bonita Grande Golf Resort to be located in Chula Vista, California We have
prepared preliminary conclUSiuns of potential market performance for the proposed hotel.
The information presented herein is for your intemal management use only and may nOt
be disclosed to any outside third parties other than City of ChuIa Vista officials without our
prior written consent.
The conclusions reached are based upon a limited analysis of the lodging market in the
competitive area as of the completion of our fieldwork in October 1991. The findings and
conClusions are subject to change pending more detailed market research and a
comprehensive market study. Also, these conclusions are subject to revision based on the
selection of the hotel affiliatioll, operator and finalization of the project design.
As in all studies of this type, the estimated results are based upon competent and efficient
management, and presume no significant chacge in the competldve position of the hotel
illduslIy in the Immediate area from that set forth in this report.
The estimated results are also based on au evaluation of the present general economy of
the area and do not take into account, or make provision for the effect of any sharp rise
or decline in local or general economic conditions which may occur.
The accompanying estimates, to the best of OUr knowledge and belief, reflect our best
jUdgement, based on present circumstances of the eJq)ected conditions and the expected
course of action for the operation of the hotel Any assumptions disclosed herein were
gathered during the course of our fieldwork. There will usually be differcnces between the
projected and actual results, because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as
expected, and those differences may be material
7"" 1")
NDV-20-91 WED 15:22
(~)
Josef and Lenore Citron
Partners
Joelen Enterprises
November 21. 1991
Cl
P.04
Pal!:e2
The scope of Our study docs not include the possible impact of zoning or environmental
regulations, licensing requirements or other such matters unless they have been brought
to aUf attention and are disclosed in the report.
Our report, and the material submitted, may not be used in any prospectus or printed
material used in connection with the sale of securities or participation interests to the
public. Furthermore, we have no obligation to update our findings regarding changes in
market conditions that Occur subsequent to the completion of our fieldwork.
We would be pleased to hear from you if we Can be of further assistance in the
interpretation and application of our findings and conclusions. We appreciate tha
cooperation extendod to us during the course of this engagement.
NDV-20-91 WED 15:23
:)
\
.'-'
i,)
P. 05
1
INTROOUCfION
The City of Chula Vista issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) in June 1990 for the
development of a 3.Qt -acce parcel of land situated adjacent to the Cbula Vista Municipal
Golf Course in the 4400 block of Bonita Road. Joelen Enterprises responded to the City's
RFP with a proposal for the development of a full-service hotel on the site. It is our
understanding that the City of ChuIa Vista has selected the proposal submitted by Joden
Enterprises and is negotiating an exclusive negotiation agreement with them..
In order to satisfy the requirements outlined by the City of Olula Vista in this agreement,
J oelen Enterprises has retained Pannell Kerr Forster to conduct a preliminary market
study, site evaluation, and facility analysis for the proposed hotel. The focus of this study
was to determine if there is sufficient market b1Ipport to substantiate the development of
a full-service hotel on the site. Assuming there is such support, loelen Enterprises plans
to undertake the development of a hotel on the site.
The scope of this study does not represenI a full feasibility analysis, but was conducted as
a market overview in order to evaluate the potential market support for the proposed hotel.
We have conducted limited market research and analysis regarding the current and
potential future demand for hotel accommodations in the market area, and have estimated
a range of occupancies, average cates and mix of demand that could be achieved by the
proposed hotel in a representative year of operation.
Our findings and conclusions of estimated market performance are subject to potential
change and modification Upon. the completion of a detailed feasibility analysis. The
conclusi01lJi are also prelitninary, as the hotel affiliation, operator, and facility design are
not finalized.
This report represents the culmination of our market research, analysis, and objective
assessments relative to tbe market support for tbe subject hotel.
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
7-/5
NOV-20-91 WED 15:23
o
'0.
~,~
P.06
SITE ANALYSTS
2
Location
The site identified in the aty of Chula Vista's Request for Proposal is an undeveloped
3.0+-acre parcel of land located in the 4400 block of Bonita Road. The site, which is
bounded by the ChuIa Vista Municipal Golf Course to the north IIl1d east, Bonita Road to
the south, and the Bonita Vis~a condominium complex to the west, is an irregular rectangle
in shape.
Contiguous to the east of this site is a 4.Q.:t.-acre parcel of land which is the current site
of the municipal golf course's pro Shop, restauraut IIl1d parking lot. Joelen Enterprises has
incorporated this parcel in its development plans for the proposed hotel, bringing the total
area of the subject site to approximately 7.0 acr:es. It should be noted that this additional
4.0~ acres of land is also owned by We City of Chula VL,ta and is CUrrently under a long-
term lease agreement with American Golf Corporation, the operator of the municipal
course.
According to We City of ChuIa Vista and Joelen Enterprises, American Golf Corporation
supports the proposed hotel development and has expressed interest in becoming a joint
venture partner in the pmject It should be noted that for the purpose of this analysis, we
have assumed that American Golf Corporation will complete an estimated $2-$3 million
renovation of the course and that the proposed hotel will have access to an adequate
number of tee times ~ order to effectively COmpete in the mid-sized, golf-oriented resort
market. Maps of the subject site and its location within San Diego County are shown on
the following pages.
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
?-/~
CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL
GOLF COURSE
:z:.
o
<::
I
N
a
I
CD
ffl
<::>
MFO
(60)
VACANT LAND
PAR CEL
CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL
GOLF COURSE
-
U1
N
"'"
D.S-/rech,IIIAd., PI.
~
cmr ROADI i __ .-P'
EQU __ ;-...-"
TR ESrRIAN _ - _ _ \' $
ArL -- _ - ~T:fo"
- . -- iOG.':\')
''JIMM y'S
CIltlle
- GREEN~I
.::)
~
'-
'3
MFO
(54)
~ .
~. .r-""15'se\ll!;tl
~ EASEMENT
:--.
"eD.~I~ ~ ~
lllQ.o -...;......_
BONI'" '''0 L" 9
l~ A=li-4:5''''''
BONITA
PLAZA
<;..
~
i"
~
~
:t} \
~ ()
BoNITA
CENTRE
"
BONITA ROAD
RFP EXHIBIT
.
=-'"
c:::>
--J
'1,
200
J
NOV-20-91 WED 15:24
f't
\.'
o
P. DB
[ Location Map]
I
Ot1rnG'~ Clll.lnty 1
. ,....-/
.'
~.
~
ffl'teq:h:fe COUnty
.'
c.u..
"enq:~II11"
~
~
.,
~
YIII."C"/l'U
...
~
Escaftdido
J
~
~
k
"'&.J('eo
7-/~
NOV-20-91 WED 15:25
o
r'>
:(._ J
P.09
Access and Visibilitt
Tbe subject site is lOCated ap.promnateJy seven miles southeast of downtown San Diego in
the City of OIuJa Vista. To access the site from the San Diego Intemational Airpor~ a
traveler would take Freeway 94 East to Interstate 805 South, exit at E Street/Bonita Road,
and make a left turn onto Bonita Road. The subject site is located appmlrirnately 1.5 miles
to the east. As E Street/Bonita Road is a major arterial throughout the South Bay area,
the subject site enjoys good exposure.
5
As cUTl'entJy proposed, the hotel structure will be 3.5 stories in height. The City of Chnla
VISta's Planning Department, however, has expressed concern regarding this proposed
height and its potential impact on view corridors into the golf course. We have assumed,
for purposes of this analysis, that the maximum height allowed at the site will be 3.5 stories
and, therefore, the proposed hotel will not be visible from the freeway. However, the
subject should be clearly visible from area surface streets, particularly Bonita Road, when
traveling throughout the surrounding community. Furthermore, it should be noted ~t
freeway access a'ld visibility are 110t considered essential to the success of golf-<lriented
lodging facilities such as the subject
Site Rnvirons
The immediate neighborhood in which the subject site is located fearures gently rolling
hills and a rural, woodsy cbarm. Local residents and visitors to the area enjoy the hIking
lUld equestrian trails running along the northem border of the subject site, in addition to
the SWeetwater Regional Park, an open space reserve located approximately one mile west
of the site. Recreational options in the area are further enhanced by the Chula Vista
Municipal Golf Course which fronts the subject site to the north and east. As proposed,
the subject hotel will be designed in order to optimize the property's vistas without
sacrificing public view corridors to the course.
Other land uses in the immediate area include multi-family residential units and a retail
strip center located across Bonita Road to the south. Major tenants in this development
include a Vans grocery store, a branch of Bank of America, McDonald's and a Round
Table Pizza. The majority of the area's office and industrial uses are located within a five-
mile radius to the south and east of the subject neighborhood.
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
?-11
NDV-20-91 WED 15:25
o
n
~". .JJ
P.10
6
AREA REVIEW
San OiegQ
The San Diego Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), as referred to in this report,
encompasses San Diego County. During the period from 1980 to 1990, the population of
the MSA. grew approximately 35.0 percent from 1,852,000 in 1980 to an estimated 2.5
million in 1990. The area has also demOIl8trated substantial growth in all sectors of the
economy in recent years, and such growth is expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
San Diego's economic base has been expaflding rapidly. The community, ooce domioated
by the presence of the U.S. Navy and then by a defeIl8e-related contracting industry, has
developed into one of America's foremost pockets of technology, particularly in the
emerging biomedical field, and has become an increasingly popular tourist destinatlorL
This diversification has provided Ii broader foundation for San Diego's economic expansion
and limited its vulnerability to economic declines.
Chula Vistl\
Encompassing approximately 29 square miles, the City of Chula Vista is located
approxlIlliltely seven miles southeast of downtown San Diego and approximately seven miles
north of the Mexican border in what is commonly referred to as the Sonth Eay. Lying
between the Sweetwater Valley to the north and the Otay Valley to the south, the South
Bay fronts the San Diego Bay to the west and the foothills of the Laguna Mountains to the
east. The City of Chula Vista itself is bounded by the cities of National City and San Diego
to the north and west and by the unincorporated areas of Bonita and San Y sidra to the east
and south. A map of the South Bay area, which includes the City of Chula Vista. is
presented on the following page.
Chula Vista, which is the second largest city in San Diego County and the twenty-third
largest city in California, has experienced a 5.7 percent compound annual increase in
population from 1980 to 1990. Currently estimated at 138,500 people, the City's population
is projected to grow to approximately 176,750 by year-end 2000, according to the general
plan projection.
PANNELL
KERR.
l!'OR,.'?rER
7..- t:21l
~~.--
0'.1" 2{AVAL
AtR nA'1'JO)rC
llOIt:11lCIL.Il!ll
'\J
,
~
'-
...0
'7
o
,.;.
..l!>
,.;.
o
o
()
~
?'
vi.
5tH,
_Ol'
COASTAL RECREAnON AREAS
.... "'""" COl.IIny
San DIa;D Iu ClIrIa Vlsla
JWr:uTnlllltCIt~tro" SIT!:S
SIt- Jtl:ltt..llmrt ,....c:n.mrs Gillot 1'\11......1,.. O'h n NBU:............,.-....
~c....,.,."CIlcb""..I__.... t c.rtc...,..tIl1IWcl r~,
· ~e..........,_......_. 4 s....-...r. .i....1
A.~IIt,~Illtc_...... __.....
7' "l...""'CII.!lJPI....d1 s.s.r,.""Ant I
-@S.lIIlIiInI \ill l""... -...,..... tnlSlmOnlllll .........LwIrl1ott.....
(!)
'"'
-
,.-
lV
^
~oTht~
\~
z,
<=>
<::
I
'"
=
I
<0
:>::
tT1
o
-
<>1
'"
0)
""'J
-
,....')
'-...
:u
-
-
NOV-20-91 WED 15:27
("',
\ 1
/-..
'\ . J
P.12
8
The number of occupied housing units in Chula Vista, which are currently estimared at
47,000, are also expected to grow significantly during the next decade, 1b1s future growth
Can primarily be attributed to the large-scale developments currently underway in the city's
eastern foothills approximately five nilles from the subject site. Tho' two largest
developments are Eastlake and Rancho del Rey. &stlake, which encompasses 3,000 acres,
features a man-made lake, hiking traiIs, new schools Ilnd a cultural center, Upon build-
out, this project will consist of over 11,000 residential units, ranging from condominiums to
estate homes, and apProximately 5.0 million square feet of commercial space. R.ancho del
Roy, which Is being developed by McMillin Development, is located just east of Interstate
805. Approximately 1,600 acres in area, this master-planned community will include
approximately 100 acres of light industrial parks, equestrian and hiking trails, nature
preserves and 4,000 residential units.
A third development, located adjaeent to the City of Chula Vista to the Southeast, is Otay
Rauch, a 34-squarc mile development planned by the Baldwin Company. This is located
approximately Seven miles from the subject site. Conceived as a new city, the project's
proposed configuration includes 45,000 to 60,000 residential units, a 4OD-acre university, a
five-star destination resort, and 1,600 acres of office and industrial space. Present pla.os
indicate that the development's first phase is scheduled to begin within three to five years.
In addition to the office and industrial space included in the above-mentioned master-
planned couununities, OIula Vista"s low land costs and city-sponsore(l loans have generated
further development in the area, including:
B~ront Development - A 25O-acre development featuring the 17-acre Marina
Gateway Business Park, a new marina and fishing pier, additional acreage
zoned for high technOlogy/industrial uses, and a proposed hotel and convention
center;
atay Valley Industrial Area - A 77O-acre redevelopment project of specially-
zoned land intended for light industrial uses;
Town Centre I - A uew $34 million Regional Center housing the m.unicipal
courts and county offices; and
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTE){
?"':l~
NDV-20-91 WED 15:28
:~l
\.
o
P.13
9
Town C'..entre II - A second-phase redevelopment plan featuring a 150,000
square foot addition. to the area's regional shopping mall.
According to a recent survey conducted by KPMG Peat MarwickjGoodkin Real Estate
Consulting Group, there were appraJdmately L2 million square feet of available office space
in QlUla Vista at year-end 1990. As of the date of this survey, there were an additional
425,000 square feet planned far constructIon, with more than 80 percent of this space
preleased. The vacancy rate indicated in the Chula Vista office market is estimated at less
than three percent.
The City's industriai market also exhibits a healthy vacancy rate, estimated at five percent
at year-end 1990. Total available industrial space in Chula Vista approximates 6.9 million
square feet, with an additional 594,000 square feet under constructiOIl.
Historically, the City of Chula Vista has been successful in attracting industry into Its
community due to its previously mentioned low land costs and strategic Location at the mid-
point between downtown San Diego and the international border. Furthermore, Chula
Vista enjoys convenient access via Interstates 5 and 805, which pass through the city on Its
western and eastern edges, respectively. The San Diego International Airport is located just
ten miles from Chula Vista, while Brown Field. a small general aviation field, is situated
five miles southeast. Additionally, the San Diego Trolley, a light-raU transit b)'Stern, runs
just east of Interstate 5 aud provides daily transportation to both downtown and the
Mexican border.
(
Growth in the area is impacted by the proximity to the Mexican border, and evolvement
of the maquiladora., or "twin plant" industry. This innovative concept enables a foreign-
owned (usually U.S.) company to capitalize on Mexico's lower labor rates by assembling or
manufacturing products in Mexico and re-exportlng the goods to the country of origin or
other destination at advantageous tariff rates. According to Mexico's Secretariat of
Commerce and Industrial Development, the agency responsible for granting maquiladora
permits, there currently are approximately 1,800 maquiladoras in Mexico employing over
500,000 workers. The maquiladora industry generated an estimated $2.5 billion in foreign
investment in Mexico during 1990. According to our discussions with the ChuIa Vista
PANNELL
KERR
FOlGTER
7~ :1.3
NOV-20-91 WED 15:28
o
o
P.14
10
Chamber of Commerce, there are approximately 70 maquiladoras based in ChuIa Vista at
this time. As Japanese and European investment in the indusuy increases, this number is
expected to grow.
Presented below is a sample listing of some of the larger maquiladora plants whose parent
companies are currently based in ChuIa VJSta.
MAWR CHULA VISTA.BASED
MAOUILADORAPLANTS
.122l
Parent Company Name
American Frame Manufacturing
AZ Engineering
Capriccio International
Coyote Pet Supplies
Decar Depot
Kendall Company
Nishlba Industries
Quaker Oats
Royal Imports and Royal Tiffany
Sana Manufacturing
Tocabl American Corporation
Trend Marketing Corporation
Vafetron. SA
Number of
.Emplovees
924
375
924
926
254
1,154
105
499
290
491
242
108
162
Source; Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce
A sample listing of major employers in the City of ChuIa Vista is presented on the following
page.
7"..2 'I
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
NOV-20-91 WED 15:29
n
MAJOR EMPLOYERS IN
CllULA VISTA
J.221
Emplover
American Fashion
Apparel Suppliers of California
Crower Cams and Equipment
Encore Manufacturiog
Hyspan Prccision Products
N ellcor, Ine.
Nelson and Sloan
Pacific Coast and Welding
Rohr Industries
San Diego Shipbuilding Repak
in,'
't..,,+,"
P.15
11
Number of
EmDlovees
300 - 400
200
130
200
125
310
250
100
6,800
25 - 100
Source; Chula Vista Cho.mber of Commerce
In addition to the city's growing business activity, Chula Vista has also been selected as the
site of the nation's only year-round Olympic Training Center. Donated by Eastlake
Development, the 150-acre site lies adjacent to the Otay Lake Reservoir. Construction,
which began in early 1990. is estimated to cost approximately $80 million. The project's
first phase is scheduled for completion in the summer of 1993. The training facility will
include water polo, volley ball. track and field, archery, cycling, rowing, synchronized
swimming and team handball facilities.
HOTEL ROOMS SUPPLY AND DEMAND
Based upon our understanding of the proposed hotel project, our interviews with local hotel
operators, and our knowledge of the San Diego County hotel market, we have determined
that there are no hotels in the local area which will offer direct competition to the subject
hoteL We have, however, identified two groups of potential competition which provide us
with an indication of the potential performance of the proposed hoteL The first group of
potential competition can be characterized as mid-sized, golf-oriented hotels which primarily
accommodate small group meeting business and individual leisure demand, llIld are
primarily located throughout the county.
?.. ;;f
PANNEl,L
KERR
FORSTER
NOV-20-91 WED 15:29
o
o
P.16
12
. -'I The second group of potential competition includes five hotels in the Chula Vista area
which will offer local market competition to the subject, primarily for commercial and local
tourist demand. While not directly competitive with the subject hotel due to their quality,
lower room rates, lack of golf and meeting facilities, and market orientations. these
properties have been included as they are important in the understanding of the area's
market conditions. Accordiogly, an overview of each market is presented in the paragraphs
which follow.
Golf-Oriented COmuetition
Exlstlul! Rooms SUPDly
Seven properties containing 917 daily available rooms comprise the subject's golf-oriented
competitive supply in 1990. A 22-room addition to Singing Hills Country Club and Lodge
Wa.$ completed in February of this year to bring the market total to 939 rooms in 1991.
These properties were determined to be competitive to the proposed hotel due to their golf-
orientation, level of facilities and amenities, rate structure and mix of demand. The table
on the following page presents a detailed profile on this supply.
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
7" .2/'
PROPOSED BONIT A GRANDE GOLF RESORT ;z:,
<:)
CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA <f
'"
PROFILE OF GOLF-ORIENTED COMPETITIVF. PROPERTIES <:)
I
OCTOBER 1991 CD
:E:
(T]
Carlllel 0
-
Carl ton Highlands Rancho SlnElng Temeclda Whispering <n
Oaks DOllbletree Pab Mesa Bernardo Hills Creek Palms U)
=
Facilities
Guest Rooms 59 176 133 287 102 80 102
Golf Holes 18 18 1~ 18 54 27 27
Golf CoursejTotal Yards 7,088 6,500 6,441 6,466 6,573 N/A 6,343
Clubhouse/Pro Shop YesfYes Yes/Yes Yes/Yes No/Yes Yes/Yes Yesty es Yes/Yes
Driving Range No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No CJ
Number of Tennis Courts None 6 4 12 11 '2 11
Health Club No Yes No Yes No No No
Pool I 2 2 2 I I 1
Restaurant 1 3 2 2 2 I I
Lounge 0 1 1 2 1 I I
Meeting Space (Sq. Ft.) 2,000 9,000 5,500 13,000 N/A 2,700 2,400
Gift Shop No Yes Yes Yes No No No
~ Tollll Acres N/A 120 200 150 720 300 N/A
~ Room Rates
Single $68 $120-150 $110 SI25-2oo $70 SI05 S79
.....:J Double 80 120-150 110 15-200 74 105 82
Corporate 30-35 IDS 90 N/A N/A 95 N/A
Weekend 68 ]30-160 130 125-200 81 105 79/82
Golf Packages
Weekday $185' SI29 $310' $122 S303' S102' S140
Weekend 220' 139 370' 144 N/A 235' 147 ':)
Green Fees
Weekday S40 $40 $40' $45 $23 $34 $23
Weekend 65 50 40' 45 27 39 28
Cart NC 10 NC NC 18 22 22
'Two nigllt/3 day packl!ge available Jnly through December
'Two night/2 day package
'Does not include cart
'Two night/two day weekend package :->
'Two night/two days Including breakfast and dinner each. day -
'An additional $20.00 for non-guests --J
Source: Pannell Kerr Forsler
NOV-20-9l WED 15:30
(-,\
\ J
In.
'.
'. .
P.18
14
Rooms Demand
Based on our preliminary research and interviews with management of the golf-oriente<:!
properties, we estimate that in 1990 the ovenill competitive supply achieved an aggregate
occupancy of 48 percent and an average daily rate of $95.00. . Excluding Carmel Highlands
Golf and Tennis Resort which was in its first full year of operation, occupancies among the
competitive properties ranged from 40 to 68 percent, with an aggregate occupancy of 55
percent Excluding Rancho Bemardo Inn, average room rates ranged from approximately
$65.00 to $87.00. It should be DOted that the previously mentioned Cannel Highlands Golf
and Tennis Resort has since become a Doubletree Hotel. representing the only nationally
affiliated property in the competitive market
Through our preliminary research and interviews with hotel management, we were able to
determine the following profile of demand in the competitive market:
GOLF-ORIENTED COMPETITIVE MARKET
TOTAL ROOMS DEMAND
l2.2J!
Market Selmlent
Occnpied
Room Nll!ltts
Percentage of
Total Demand
Golf Groups
Group Meetings
Leisure
Commercial
Total
34,400
70,200
50.700
6.1100
162.100
21%
44
31
~
100%
Source: Pannell Kerr Forster
Over a three-year period, the competitive market has experienced moderate growth in
rooms demand. The following table illustrates the demonstrated growth in supply and
demand from 1989 to 1991 in the competitive market.
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
7"'.2 ~
NOV-20~91 WED 15:31
()
.~
,
\H
P.19
15
GOLF.ORIENTED COMPETITIVE MARKET
GROWI'H IN SUPPLY AND DEMAND
1989 - 1991
Number
Year of Hotels
1989 7
1990 7
19911 7
Annual Annual
Available Occupied Occupancy Average
Rooms Rooms Pereentall'e Room Rate
291,880 157,100 54% $94.00
334,7(}(f 162,100 48 95.00
342,740" 169,500 49 92.00
Compound Annual
Percent Change
1989-1991
8.4%
3.9%
(1.1)%
11991 occupancy and average rate estimates based on property interviews and
the actual operating results of the properties through the first eight months
of 1991.
2Represents incremental room increase from first full year of operation of
Carmel Highlands Golf and Tennis Resort.
3Represen~ 20-room addition to Singing Hills Counuy Club.
Source: Pannell Kerr Forster
As the above chart indicates, rooms supply increased at a rate of 8.4 percent compounded
annually from 1989 to 1991. Although rooms demand during the same time period also
demonstrated positive growth, it did Dot keep pace with the growth in supply resulting in
declining market occupancies. The above occupancy and average rate statistics include the
performance of the recently opened Carmel Highlands Golf and Tennis Resort. As this
property's rooms comprise approximately 19 percent of the total supply, its growing, but
below market share performance has had a downward impact on overall market
occupancies, particularly in 1990, its first full year of operation. We anticipate, however,
that tbe property's recent affiliation with Doublctree Hotels will result in improved
occupancy and average rate levels in the near-term.
Through our research and understanding of the suppJy and demand characteristics of the
competitive market, we anticipate demand growth to exceed supply growth beginning in
1991, supporting stronger occupancy levels. Specifically, group meetings. leisure, and to a
lesser e.'ctent commercial demand should exhibit increased growth as San Diego continues
PANNELL
KERR.
FORSTER
7...;1. '7
NDV-20-91 WED 15:31
n
'-.--/
o
P.20
16
to receive increased exposure via suciI national and international events as the Super Eowl
and the America's Cup Competition, the 1989 opening of the San Diego Convention
Center, and the continued attractiveness of San Diego as a tourist destination.
In tenus of average room rates, the market is estimated to experience a slight decline in
rate during 1991. This can largely be attributed to the negative first quarter impact
resulting from the Persian Gulf War and the economic re~ion. However. as the
economy improves and as no new entrants to the competitive market are expected in the
short-term, market average room rates should exhibit positive growth beginning in 1992.
Additions to Lodl!ine: Sup,,\):
During the course of our preliminary fieldwork, we discovered six golf-oriented properties
that are eitber proposed for development or are currently under construction. A summary
of tbese properties, including their estimated number of rooms, projected opening date and
current status is presented in the table on the following page.
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
?-3tJ
- NDV-20-91 WED 15:32
o
\...
:1)
~----"
P.21
17
GOLF-ORffiNTED COMPETITIVE MARKET
PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO SUPPLY
Number Projected
Proiect/Location of Rooms Onenlne Date Status
Four Seasons Aviara Resort 450 January 1993 Under construction'
CarIsbad
Pointe San Diego Resort 698 July 1993 Finall'lanning stages
East San Diego County
Stouffer's Las Montanas 425 N/A Awaiting financing
East San Diego County
Fanita Ranch 100 N/A PrelirnirulIy planning
Santee stages
San EJijo Ranch 300 N/A Prclimimuy planning
San Marcos stages
Steele Canyon 376 N/A Preliminary planning
East San Diego County stages
1 As of the date of this report, construction has ceased until financing can be obtained.
Source: Pannell teerr Forster, respective planning departments, developors and hotel
companies
In addition to the six projects summarized above, our research revealed preliminary
discussions regarding the future expansion of Carlton Oaks and the possible development
of a hotel in conjunction with the Rancho San Diego Golf Course in EI Cajon. However,
at this time, both projects are only rumored.
It should also be noted that with the exception of Fanita Ranch, the above projects are
proposed as four- to five.star destination resorts offering significantly higher quality resort
devolopments and rate structures tban currently planned fOr the subject hotel. Additionally,
given today's difficult financing environment, the timing of tbese projects is uncertain, at
best.
In summary, we have assumed that no additions to the defined supply will enter the market
at the subject's proposed quality level within the immediate future. However, should any
J.>ANNELL
KERR
FORSTRR
?...:JJ
, NOV-20-91 WED 15:32
o
(.\
\_.1
P.22
18
of the proposed hotels listed above or others be completed and capture demand from the
competitive supply of golf-orlented hoteIs, the overall market occupancies could be
adversely affected.
Local C-Oltlnetitlon
Existinll Rooms SUDn/,Y.
Five properties containing 5BB daily available rooms comprised the subject's local
competitive supply in 1990, As previously discussed, due to their lack of golf facilities,
lower quality amenities and services, market orientations and lower rate structUres, these
properties are not considered to be directly competitive with the proposed hotel. However,
we have reviewed the performance of these properties in our analysis as they provide
insight into the local lodging market. The following table provides a brief profile of these
facilities,
PROFILE OF Ul(,AL COMPE'nTIVE PROPERTIES
1W!
1m
Number Year Distance From Publislwd Room Rates
Pronerty of Room~ Opened Site (Mile.~) Sinme Douhle
All Seasons Inn 108 1984 2.5 $47-$54 $52-$62
Days Inn 119 1982 2.5 42-75 54-80
La Qulnta 142 1987 1.5 51-58 59-66
Otay Valley Inn 122 1988 5.0 58 68
Ramada Inn 97 1980 1.5 60-65 67-72
Total 588
Source: Pannen Ketr Forster
Existlul' Rooms Demand
For year-end 1990, we estimate that the local competitive supply achieved an aggregate
Occupancy level of 68 percent at an average daily rate of approximately $47.00. Specifically,
occupancies among the competitive properties ranged from 65 to 71 percent, while average
room rates ranged from approximately $38.00 to $55.00. Presented in the fOllowing table
is the estimated mix of demand for the local competitive market.
PANNELL
KERR
FOl{STER
7' .:J~
, NOV-20~91 WED 15:33
()
o
P.23
19
LOCAL COMPETITIVE MARKE't
'TOTAL ROOMS DEMAMl
l22Q
Market Se.mtent
O~pied
Room NlelJ(l!
Percentage of
Total Demand
Leisure
ColllIUercial
Group Meetings
GOVernment
Total
64,800
57,400
5,600
17.900
145.700
45%
39
4
..n.
100%
Source: Pannell Kerr For-ster
As illustrated above, rooms demand in the local market is comprised primarily of leisure
and cOll1Illercial demand. Leisure demand consists largely of individual travelers or
organized tour groups visiting Tijuana who desire accommodations north of the
international border.
Commercial demand is generated primarily by the maquiladora industry and seCOndarily by
private industry. According to our Interviews with local fIrms, a significant number of
COmmercial room nights arc currently seeking aCCOmmodations in the peripheral areas of
downtown San Diego and Mission Valley due to the lack of existing first-class hotels in the
area.
The remaining room nights in the area arc generated by government employees{militaly
personnel doing business at the nearby Naval Air Station, and to a lesser elctent, small
meeting groups.
Similar to the primary competitive market, the local market has also eJdribited moderate
growth in rooms demand during the last three-year period The following table illustrates
the demonstrated growth In supply and demand from 1988 to 1991 in the COmpetitive
market.
PANNELL
KERR
I!'ORSTER
?... 3::1
, NOV-20-91 WED 15:33
CJ
n
\._.r
P.24
LOCAL COMPETIT~ MA::T
GROWTH IN SuPPl.Y D AND
1989-1991
20
X!;m:
Annual Annual
Number Available Occupied Occupancy Average
\If Hotels llooms Rooms Percentl\1';e Room Rate
5 214.620 147,100 69% $44.00
5 214,620 145,700 68 47.00
5 214,620 155,200 72 45.00
1989
1990
19911
Compound Annual
Percent Change
1989-1991
0-0%
2.7%
1.1%
11991 Occupancy and average rate estimates are based on competitive _
property interviews and current market trends.
Source: Pannell Ken: Forster
As presented in the above table, rooms supply bas remained stable during the last three
Years. Rooms demand hilS grown at a compound annual rate of 2.7 percent during the
same time period resulting market Occupancies increasing from 69 to 72 percent.
Based upon our research and underlying knowledge of the local market, we anticipate
demand growth to continue exceeding supply growth In 1991 and beyond. As stated in our
discussion of the golf-oriented market, San Diego's increased exposure \!ia media events.
the San Diego Convention Center, and San Diego's increasing appeal as a tourist
destination, should result in continued growth in the leisure and group meetings markets.
Commercial demand should also continue to expand due to the increasing popularity of the
maquiladora concept and the growth of available office and industrial space generated by
the area's low land costs and city-sponsored loans, Due to recent defense cutbacks, we
estimate little or no additional growth in the government/military segment.
7- 3 tf
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
.- NOV-20-91 WED 15:34
;-.
; }
rj
'\.
P.25
Average foam rates in the competitive market have exhibited only slight growth since 1989.
However, we anticipate that lL'! the c<:onomy continues to strengthen and as the South Bay
area grows in appeaL the composite market average foam rate should grow at an increasing
pace in the neaf.!erm future.
21
Additions to Lodvn" 80\)Dly
During the course of our preliminary fieldwork, we discovered three properties that are
proposed fOJ: development within the local market area, as presented in the table helow.
LOCAL COMPETITIVE MARKET
PROPOSED ADOITIONS TO SUPPLY
Number PnUected
Proicct/Location of Rooms Openfnl: Date
Otay Ranch 5-Star Resort Not N/A
Otay Mesa Determined
Proposed All-Suite Hotel 140 N/A
National CIty
Radisson Suites Hotel 176 N/A
National City
Status
Preliminary planning
Permits have expired
Seeking financing
Source: Pannell Kerr Forster, respective planning departments, developers, and hotel
companies
As indicated, the proposed projects listed Above arc still preliminary in nature. We have,
therefore, assumed thAt no hotels will be developed in the local market area within the
immediate future. However, should any of these properties or others be completed and
capture demand from the local competitive supply of hotel.'!, the overall market Occupancies
could be adversely affected.
7-35
PANNELL
KERR
I!'ORSTER
- NOV-20-91 WED 15:34
~
'}
~
" )
'( ,
P.26
FACILITY RECOMMENDATIONS
22
Based on our preliminary reSearch and analysis of competitive supply and demand
characteristics, we recOmmend the proposed hotel be developed as a first-class, golf-
oriented hotel, as further described below.
Facility
Hotel CAlDCept
150+ room hotel;
Resort ambiance;
LoW-rise fucility; and
Balconies/terraces overlooking the golf course.
Restaurant
Full-service restaurant (125 + seats) with outdoor terrace for expanded seating
capacity; and
Lobby lounge (50+ seats).
Meetlnl!' Faci/itie~
High-quality, flexible meeting space oriented toward the golf course;
Outdoor patio for social functions; and
Approximately 6,000 to 8,000 square feet.
Guest Amenities
Available tee times on adjacent 18-hole golf course, including ancillary uses
such as driving range, pro shop, and "19th hole";
Outdoor swimming pool with limited food and beverage service;
Jacuzzi;
2 to 3 tennis courts;
Maintenance of existing jOgging/equestrian paths;
Bicycle path with rental facilities;
Exercise facilities; and
Complimentary transportation to airport and the international border.
Aftiliatioll,!MlInaltement
At present, there are no hotels in the golf-oriented supply with a chain affiliation except the
recently aftiliated Carmel Highlands Doubletrce Reson. Due to the competitiveness of the
mid-sized, golf.oriented resort market in San Diego County, our research indicates that
occupancy levels at these properties could likely be enhanced by a national affiliation and
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
7- :J/?
NOV-20-91 WED 15:35
o
0'.
'.
P.27
the resultant marketing and group sales orientation of a natiOnal chain. Accordingly, we
recommend that the proposed property operate with a well-known national affiliation.
23
:TIMATEO MARKIIT PERFORMANCE OF mE PROPOSED l50+ ROOM BONITA
GRANDE GOLF RE~ORT
In estimating the potential market performance of the subject property, we analyzed the
market performance of the existing golf and local hotel supply, the status and potential
impact of proposed hotels in both market areas, and projected increases in market demand.
Our research and analysis indicates that there is potential demand to support the
development of the proposed 150+ room Bonita Grande Golf Resort at the fOllowing
estimated performance levels.
PROPOSED BONIn GlUNDE GOLF RF~1rT
REPRESE~;::~cr:~ O~%~~~O~
ESTIMATE OF oce A A 0 M RATE
Representative Occupancy
Representative Average Room Rate - 1991 Dollars
70 - 72%
$75 - $85
Source: Pannell Kerr Forster
Our estimated mix of demand for the Subject hotel is approximately 15 percent leisure, 25
percent commercial. 45 percent group meetings, and 15 percent golf groups.
This mil.: estimate is based on the follOwing faeton;;
The San Diego Metropolitan Statistical Area, which experienced a 35.0
percent Increase In population during the 19805, has also demonstrated
Substantial economic growth. This growth is expected to continue, sUppotting
a healthy lOdging market in the foreseeable future;
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
7" 3?
. NOV-20-91 WED 15:35
t)
in.-
'\. .."
P.28
24
The City of Chula Vista has also experienced healthy growth Over the last
decade. Due to its strategic location at the mid-point between downtown San
Diego and the .international border, Chula Vista has been successful at
attracting industry into its community. The area's low land COSts and
convenient transit'systems have also contributed to the area's appeal;
As the maquiladora industry becomes increasingly popular and as the master-
planned communities of Eastlake, Rancho del Rey and Otay Ranch reach
buiId-{)ut, commercial demand for finll-class botel rooms in the local area is
expected to gww. Due to the lack of e;tisting first-class hotels in the local
area, a significant amount of this demand currently seeks accommodatioQS in
either downtown San Diego or Mission Valley. As proposed, the subject
hotel should be able to effectively capture a share of this demand.
Furthermore, the city's selection as the nation's Only year-round Olympic
Training Center should enhance the area's exposure, generating additional
rooms demand in the future;
There are currentl no golf-oriented hotels in the South Ba area.
ur ermore, WIt e exception 0 e anlla anc project w IC is
preliminary in nature, the golf-oriented properties proposed for development
in the county are expected to offer significantly higher average rates.
Additionally, there are only a limited number of golf-oriented properties
proposed at this time, all of whose future development is uncertain, at best.
The average rate estimated for the subject hotel ranges between $75.00 and
$85.00, and should allow the hotel to establish a niche for fIrst-class, golf-
oriented accommodations at moderate rates and compete with the other golf
hotels located throughout the county. This rate level will aJso allow the hotel
to compete effectively for locaJ commercial patronage;
AJthough the subject hotel will not be visible from the freeway, its location
along Bonita Road, one of the primary arterials throughout the South Bay
area, should provide good access to the site. Additionally, its location
adjacent to a well-established municipal golf course should provide the subject
with excellent exposure in the San Diego golf community;
PANNELL .
KERR.
FOR"TER
7- J y1
- NOV-20-91 WED 15:36
...-.:
()
p, 29
.--',
\ )
25
Our research indicates demand for quality meeting facilities in the golf-
onente 0 grog mar e e su ~ect 0 eve op WI. e recommen cd
6,000 to H,OUU square feet of meeting space should be well-positioned to
compete effectively for this demand. Furthermore, due to the lack of quality
meeting facilities in the Chula Vista market, the subject hotel should become
the premier choice for local meeting llnd banquet business.
PANNELL
KEltR
l"ORSTER
7- :11
RESOLUTION I~t, '15'
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT WITH
JOELEN ENTERPRISES FOR THE NEGOTIATION OF A DISPOSITION
AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR A PROPOSED RESORT HOTEL
WHEREAS, the City Council issued an RFP for development of City-owned property
adjacent to the Municipal Golf Course in June 1990, and
WHEREAS, on November 26, 1991, the City Council approved an Exclusive
Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Joelen Enterprises for a period of 120 days to negotiate
towards a Disposition and Development Agreement, and
WHEREAS, additional time is required to negotiate the items delineated in the ENA,
and
WHEREAS, a First Amendment has been prepared extending the ENA for 180 days
from its execution and identifying tasks to be completed within certain timeframes.
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
does hereby approve and authorize the proposed First Amendment to the ENA between the City
of Chula Vista and Joelen Enterprises for negotiation towards development of a golf resort hotel.
r9-,
Bruce M. Boogaar
Agency General
Presented by:
Chris Salomone, Executive Secretary and
Community Development Director
[C:IWP51ICOUNCILIRESOSIJOELEN-2.RES]
7- J/()
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 06/02/92
~
ITEM TITLE: Resolution / ~".yIP Accepting bids and awarding contract
for Oxford Street Storm Drain Improvements from Second Avenue to Del
Mar Avenue in the City of Chula Vista, California
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public wor~~, L..
Community Development Director (.,J ,
REVIEWED BY:
City Managez:t
(4/Sths Vote: Yes
No...K..)
BACKGROUND:
At 2:00 p.m. on May 6, 1992 in the Public Services Building, the Director of Public Works
received sealed bids for the"Oxford Street Storm Drain Improvements from Second Avenue to
Del Mar Avenue, in the City of Chula Vista, California" project.
The project is intended to provide flooding relief and to extend and improve the storm drain
system on Oxford Street east of Second Avenue to Del Mar Avenue by the installation of
reinforced concrete pipes and street inlets. The work includes clearing, grubbing and
mobilitations, construction of storm drain system, asphalt concrete pavement, traffic control, and
other miscellaneous items of work shown on the plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept bids and award contract to Caves, Inc.
in the amount of $149,712.00.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The work to be performed under this contract is under a program providing direct Federal
fmancial assistance from the Department of Housing and Urban Development and is subject to
the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Development (HUD) Act of 1968 as amended,
12 U.S.C. 1701 U and the regulations set forth in 24 CFR, 135. The work to be performed
under this contract is also subject to the affirmative action requirements for minority- and
women-owned business enterprise participation in compliance with Executive Order 11246.
Bids for this project were received from eleven contractors as follows:
~-I
1. Caves, Inc.
2. Overson-Rand Corp.
3. J.E. Brokaw and Son, Inc.
4. C.W.. McGrath, Inc.
5. Carolyn E. Scheidel Cont.
6. L.L. Brown's Engineering, Inc.
7. Southland Paving, Inc.
8. Dietrich Corp.
9. Miramontes Construction Co.
10. Falcon General Engineering, Inc.
II. Rick's Backhoe Service
San Diego, Ca.
Lakeside, Ca.
Escondido, Ca.
EI Cajon, Ca.
La Mesa, Ca.
EI Cajon, Ca.
Escondido, Ca.
EI Cajon, Ca.
Industry, Ca.
Vista, Ca.
EI Cajon, Ca.
Page 2, Item g"
Meeting Date 06/02/92
$149,712.00
155,781.00
157,149.00
165,999.40
196,600.80
199,648.88
205,002.98
205,676.00
209,481. 00
214,262.00
218,842.12
Staff has reviewed the low bid by Caves, Inc. and it is below the Engineer's estimate of
$227,116.00 by $77,404 or 34 percent; staff conducted a background check and past
performance evaluation and determined that Caves, Inc. has successfully performed similar
projects for the City in the past. Staff has reviewed the minority- and women-business
enterprise participation and determined that Caves, Inc., has met the City's goals. Therefore
staff recommends awarding the contract to Caves, Inc.
Attached is a copy of the Contractor's Disclosure Statement.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
FUNDS REOUlRED FOR CONSTRUCTION:
A. Contract Amount
B. Staff
C. Contingencies
TOTAL FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION:
$149,712.00
7,485.00
14.971.00
$172,168.00
A. 641-6410-DR108
B. 25D-2501-DRI08
C. 644-6440-DR108
D. 647-6470-DRI08
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
$ 884.13
99,289.84
21,181.00
50.813.03
$172,168.00
FISCAL IMPACT: This reflects an expenditure of funds authorized in the Capital
Improvement Program budget as indicated. Upon completion of the project, it will require
routine City maintenance.
[C:IWP51 ICOUNCD..\113SI0XFORDST .113]
8"".;2.
MEMORANDUM
May 28, 1992
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
John D. Goss, City Manager
Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney
Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Roberto Saucedo, Senior Civil Engineer
Harlan Wilson, Street Maintenance Superintendent
\
John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works~\
Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for "Oxford Street Storm
Drain Improvements from Second Avenue to Del Mar Avenue in the City of
Chula Vista, California"
1. FUNDS REOUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION:
A. Contract Amount
B. Staff
C. Contingencies
TOTAL FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION
$149,712.00
7,485.00
14.971.00
$172,168.00
2. FUNDS A V AILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION:
A. 64l-64l0-DRl08
B. 250-250l-DR108
C. 644-6440-DR108
D. 647-6470-DR108
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
$ 884.13
99,289.84
21,181.00
50.813.03
$172,168.00
[C,I WP51 ICOUNCILII13SI0XFORDST .113]
'l)-3/ '-1
,
RESOLUTION I~~fd?
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR OXFORD STREET
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM SECOND A VENUE TO DEL MAR
A VENUE IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids on May 6, 1992 at 2:00
p.m. for the Oxford Street Storm Drain Improvements from Second Avenue to Del Mar Avenue in
the City of Chula Vista, California; and
WHEREAS, the project is intended to provide flooding relief and to extend and
improve the storm drain system on Oxford Street east of Second Avenue to Del Mar Avenue by the
installation of reinforced concrete pipes and street inlets, including clearing, grubbing and
mobilitations, construction of storm drain system, asphalt concrete pavement, traffic control, and other
miscellaneous items of work as shown on the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the contract is under a program providing direct Federal financial
assistance from the Department of Housing and Urban Development and subject to requirements of
Section 3 of HUD Act of 1968 as amended, 12 U.S.C. 1701 U and the regulations set forth in 24
CFR, 135 and the work performed is also subject to the affirmative action requirements for minority
and female participation in compliance with Executive Order 11246; and
WHEREAS, Caves, Inc., submitted the low bid and is below the City Engineer's
estimate and, staff conducted a background check which confirmed Caves', Inc. past performance
experience; and
WHEREAS, funds are available in accounts: 641-641O-DRI08 ($884.13); 250-2501-
DR108 ($99,289.84); 644-6440-DRI08 ($21,181.00); and 647-6470-DR108 ($50,813.03).
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
does hereby award the contract for the Oxford Street Storm Drain Improvements from Second Avenue
to Del Mar Avenue in the City of Chula Vista, California.
A~~furm
Presented by:
John P. Lippitt
Director of Public Works
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
Chris Salomone, Executive Secretary and
Community Development Director
[C,IWP51 ICOUNCILIRESOSIOXFORDST .RES]
~-5'
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
Meeting Date 6-2-92
Resolution 1~'J/7 Approving First Amendment to agreement
with the California Department of Transportation for
interchange traffic signal s improvement at Interstate Route 5
and Palomar Street and authorize the Mayor to execute said
agreement
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Work~-~
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes__No-x-)
On July 17, 1990, City Council approved a cooperative agreement with the State
Department of Transportation (CalTrans) to install traffic signals at the 1-5
and Palomar Street interchange. The improvements will also include some ramps
widening and restriping. The cooperative agreement was to terminate upon
completion of the project or on June 30, 1992, whichever is earlier in time.
ITEM TITLE:
The construct i on of the interchange signals and road work is schedul ed for
early July 1992. CalTrans is requesting to extend the expiration date of the
cooperative agreement to June 30, 1993 or the completion of the project which
ever is earlier in time.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resol ut i on and authori ze the Mayor
to execute said agreement.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
On April 20, 1992, CalTrans advertised to receive bids for the improvements of
1-5 and Palomar Street interchange.
The improvements will consist of installing fully actuated traffic signals at
the northbound and southbound off-ramps and widening the on-ramps and
off-ramps to allow for two-lane traffic. New curb, gutter and sidewalk will
be installed on the south side of Palomar Street within the CalTrans
right-of-way.
On May 21, 1992 bids for the project were received by the State. The apparent
low bidder is Sim J. Harris. The low bid is $241,900 or 13.4% below the
engineer's estimate of $279,200. After all engineering, inspection, materials
and other costs are added, the total project cost is anticipated to be
approximately $400,000. The City and CalTrans will each pay 50% of the
tot a 1 . There are enough funds in the account to complete the project. The
construction is due to commence the beginning of July 1992 and last 3 months.
In accordance with CalTrans staff the traffic signals at 1-5 and Palomar
Street should be operational by September 1, 1992.
9./
Page 2, Item ~
Meeting Date 6-2-92
Due to the new construction schedul e whi ch extends beyond June 30, 1992, the
existing cooperative agreement will have to be amended to extend the
expiration date to June 30, 1992 or the completion of the project whichever is
earlier in time.
FISCAL IMPACT: On July 17, 1990, Council approved this project as a joint
project between the City and CalTrans, with each agency responsible for
one-ha If the cost, and appropri ated $214,000 (600-6005- TF208) for the
construction of the project. It appears that the City may get some money back
($14 , 000.:t) due to the low bid below the estimated cost. The City will also
share the signal maintenance and energy cost estimated at $3,300 per year.
WPC 6002E
ZAO:BR-037
'1- ..2
11-SD-5
5.7/6.42
11359-148620
Agreement No. 11-0428 A/I
Palomar street
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON is
between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its
Department of Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a body politic
and a municipal corporation of the
State of caliornia, referred to
herein as CITY.
RECITALS
1. The parties hereto entered into an Agreement (Document
No. 7233) on July 24, 1990, said AGREEMENT defining the terms
and conditions of a cooperative project to install a traffic
control signal system and safety lighting and perform roadwork
at the intersections of Palomar Street with the northbound and
southbound Interstate 5 freeway ramps, referred to herein as
PROJECT.
2. It has also been determined that PROJECT will not be
constructed prior to the termination date of said AGREEMENT.
IT IS THEREFORE MUTUALLY 'GREED
1. That Section III, Article 16 of the original AGREEMENT is
amended to read "That this Agreement shall terminate upon
completion and acceptance of PROJECT construction contract by
STATE or on June 30, 1993, whichever is earlier in time;
however, the ownership, operation, and maintenance clauses
shall remain in effect until terminated, in writing, by mutual
agreement. Should any construction related claim arising out
of the contract to construct this project be asserted against
STATE, CITY agrees to extend the termination date of this
Agreement and provide additional funding as required to cover
CITY's proportionate share of costs or execute a subsequent
agreement to cover those eventualities."
9-.3
11-0428 A/I
2. The other terms and conditions of said Agreement (Document
No. 7233) shall remain in full force and effect.
3. This Amendment to Agreement is hereby deemed to be a part of
Document No. 7233.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
JAMES W. van LOBEN SELS
Director of Transportation
By
Mayor
By
Attest:
Deputy District Director
City Clerk
Approved as to Form
and Procedure
Attorney
California Department of Transportation
certified as to Funds and Procedure
District Accounting Admi..istrator
2
9-1
RESOLUTION NO.
11o~ lJ7
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FOR INTERCHANGE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
IMPROVEMENT AT INTERSTATE ROUTE 5 AND PALOMAR
STREET AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, on July 17, 1990, the city Council approved a
Cooperative Agreement with the State Department of Transportation
(CalTrans) to install traffic signals at the 1-5 and Palomar Street
interchange; and
WHEREAS, the Cooperative Agreement was to terminate upon
completion of the project or on June 30, 1992, whichever is earlier
in time; and
WHEREAS, the construction of the interchange signals and
road work is scheduled for early July, 1992; and
WHEREAS, CalTrans is requesting to extend
date of the Cooperative Agreement to June 30,
completion of the project which is earlier in time.
the expiration
1993 or the
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the First Amendment to
Agreement with the California Department of Transportation for
Interchange Traffic Signals Improvement at Interstate Route 5 and
Palomar Street, a copy of which is on file in the office of the
City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to exe ute said First
Amendment for and on behalf of the city of Chula ita.
Presented by
APtr
orm by n
~
City
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
ruce M.
Attorney
C:\rs\Coop 1st Amend
9-5'
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
It)
Meeting Date 6/2/92
ITEM TITLE:
Ratification of Nature Interpretive Center Volunteer to the
Board of Directors of the Bayfront Conservancy Trust.
Executive Director, Bayfront Conservancy Trust ~
City Manager9'
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
(4/Sths Vote: Yes_Nol)
At their March 24, 1992 meeting, the Board of Directors of the Chula Vista
Bayfront Conservancy Trust created a new Board seat for a volunteer from the
Nature Center. Following your recommendation, that member is elected by
the volunteers and ratified by the Council. At their regular meeting of May 16,
1992, the Nature Interpretive Center Volunteers elected Docent, Susan Fuller, as
their representative by a clear majority. In order to serve, her election needs
to be ratified by the Council.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council ratify the elected Docent, Susan
Fuller, to serve as the Representative of the Volunteers of the Nature Center on
the Board of Directors of the Chula Vista Bayfront Conservancy Trust.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: None.
DISCUSSION: This member of the Board is elected by the volunteers
and ratified by the Council. The Nature Interpretive Center Volunteers elected
their representative at their regular meeting of May 16, 1992. In order to serve,
that appointment needs to be ratified by the Council.
Susan Fuller has been a volunteer at the Nature Center since before it opened
in 1987. She graduated from one of the first Docent Training Classes and has
been a tour leader and interpreter since then. Sue brings a genuine love of
nature to her volunteering and a strong interest in restoring and enhancing
Chula Vista's wetlands.
Susan Fuller has been a volunteer and board member of the Starlight Center
since its inception. She has served on the Chula Vista Planning Commission
since 1987 and is currently serving as Chairwoman. She is the Office Manager
of Fuller Plumbing in Chula Vista.
Susan Fuller has been a strong volunteer at the Nature Center. Her skills, energy
and enthusiasm for our mission will serve the Bayfront Conservancy Trust well.
We would be honored to have her as a Board Member and therefore ask
that you ratify her election forthwtth.
FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact on the Ctty.
ItJ-/
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Itell / J
Meeting Date 6/2/92
ITEM TITLE: Report: Request for City Council support of AB 2685 to
transfer excess SR 54 right-of-way to the Council of
Pilipino-American Organizations of San Diego County, Inc.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning jt2f
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-X-)
On May 12, 1992, Council considered a resolution from the Council of
Pilipino-American Organizations of San Diego County, Inc. (COPAO) requesting
Council support for Assembly Bill 2685. Sponsored by Assemblyman Peter
Chacon, this bill would transfer title to approximately 20,000 sq. ft. of
excess State Route 54 right-of-way to COPAO for the development of a
Pilipino-American multi-cultural community center (please see attached
documentation). The Council referred the request to staff for review and
report.
Staff met with representatives of COPAO and di scussed the 1 imitat ions of the
site with respect to the development of a community center -- the property is
a long, narrow wedge of land which measures approximately 500 ft. long and 50
ft. wide at its widest point. In recognition of these limitations, COPAO is
now interested in using the site for their administrative offices only, and
has contacted Assemblyman Chacon's office to amend AB 2685 accordingly. They
have also prepared a conceptual development plan to support their request.
REClM4ENDATION: That Council support AB 2685, provided the bill is amended
to allow the site to be used as an administrative facility for this
organization.
BOARDS/ClM4ISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The 20,000 sq. ft. of property in question is vacant land which would be
parcelled-out from the existing SR 54 right-of-way between North Glover Avenue
and Trousdale Drive, and which abuts the northerly boundary of the Sweetwater
Valley Industrial Park. The eastbound SR 54 on-ramp from Fourth Avenue abuts
and is elevated above the northerly boundary of the site. Access to the site
is provided at two points off the cul-de-sac ends of both Trousdale Drive and
North Glover Avenue.
The proponents have presented staff with a conceptual development plan showing
a 1,700 sq. ft., two-story office structure located in the south-central
portion of the site, oriented to the north toward the SR 54 on-ramp. The plan
indicates a total of 12 angled parking spaces situated along a one-way drive
with ingress from Trousdale and egress to North Glover. The floor plan shows
offices and a conference room. The building elevations reflect a
contemporary, interesting architectural design.
/ /., I
.
Page 2, It~ 1'1'
Meeting Date 6/2/92
The parcel is presently unzoned, and surrounding properties are zoned I-L.
The general plan designation for the area is Limited Industrial, so the most
appropriate zone for the subject parcel would be I-L. The setbacks for the
site would be 15 feet in the front and zero on all other sides (with the
exception of a three foot separation to provide for approved openings). Other
development standards would include a maximum height of 45 ft. or 3-1/2
stories and maximum lot coverage of 50 percent. Since a social and/or
fraternal club office can be considered as an "Unclassified Use", it can be
located in any zone with the approval of a conditional use permit by the City
Counc il .
This parcel was originally included in the area acquired for freeway
construction, and therefore would have been included in the EIR for that
project. Noise would be a significant factor for any land use planned for a
parcel which abuts a freeway in order to address sound attenuation.
Consequently, an initial environmental study with a noise analysis would be
required. The project would also be subject to review and approval by the
Design Review Committee.
CONCLUSION:
The conceptual development plan appears to meet a 11 of the City's bas i c
development standards. A 1,700 square foot office structure requires six
parking spaces, whereas the plan shows 12 spaces. The structure meets the I-L
zone setbacks, and considering the qual ity of the prel iminary architectural
design, and potential landscape enhancements, would certainly provide a more
pleasing view from the freeway than the present view of the rears of
industrial buildings and storage areas.
The site plan presently does not meet the City's requirements for fire
equipment access, but could be made to conform by equipping the building with
sprinklers and by providing an on-site turnaround for which there is adequate
room. Al so, there may need to be some devi at i on from the requi red one-way
driveway width of 15 feet for the egress point on North Glover Avenue, which
appears to be around 12-13 feet wide. It is believed, however, that these and
any other specific issues regarding site and architectural design can be
resolved.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
WPC 0310p
1/',)...
____ \ C ~ C
S'4/EE" '4/,.,.ER
R \ \/ER
\.I( "'''
f'f0J f:Vi
L.OuATloN
RO\frE
54
---
.J
'"
'"
UJ
a::
Cl.
DRIVE
,...
I
I
::t
-:--- ': ~ - .. ---- ~~ ~
, r--------...:--~::::)
" 0
" U.
I I
, I
, ,
, I
, I
I '
, I
< I
I I
I I
I r--r---]
, ~ ' I
I
I
I
w
~
t
y
I
-- --I
Q
!!'
:r
....
,
\.
::t
~
0:
o
Z
--. . ,...',
.).-".
:r
....
a:
o
z
~
j
I.
v STREET
:.,
:UCA.L TYPTUS PARK
.\
UJ SEA VALE
~ [LlJJ
.
".'.. J.;
....~
] LOCATOR
//~3 ) ~
, .
, ,
I I
._~, APR-23-'92 THJ 14:47 ID:PETER ~
m t<I: 619 232-6036
~ ~:L ._, ____
. .
.
,
_,r
\\ r-'~:~~~t4
. '
(])
... \
.
"
o"'~
,~I,.
,
~G
\
\
,
\
\ , \..
\0 ...
t
~
~'
~
\ .
W- I ..
;}:--
~ . . .
, ~ "b
f .
\. I
~ , " ..,
~ ,....."
.
4"'P' ~'.,
~ ~...... I ..'" .-'
..--- ,
~ .' .. -.'
..- 00
J /-'/ ,
-
-
-
· EXECUTIVE BOARD
Paul D. Ones
Chairman
RIz A. Oldes, Ph.D.
Vice-Chairman
Rosie Padua Mob
Executive Secretary
Carol Leyva
Asst. Secretary
Ruth onna
Treasurer
Dlno Ellorin
Asst. Treasurer
Regina Mendoza, C.P.A.
Auditor
Ernie Flores, Jr.
PRO
. MEMBERS
COUNCIL OF PILIPINO-AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONS
OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, INC.
"COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THROUGH SELF-RELIANCE"
April 30, 1992
His Honor, Mayor Tim Nader
and Honorable MerIDers of
the City Council
City of Chula Vista
276 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed is a copy of a Resolution by the Executive Board,
Council of Pilipino-American Organizations, seeking the
support of the Mayor and Members of the City Council of
Chula Vista in connection with a piece of public land being
acquired fran the California DepartIrent of Transportation
by the Council of Pilipino-American Organizations (COPAO).
This piece of land is, indeed, vital in rreeting the needs
of the Pilipino-American conmunity to have its own multi-
cultural center. It is sad to note that while the other
minority groups, including Mexican-Americans and Black-
Americans, am:mg others, have their own cultural centers
and/or office buildings supported or funded by the govern-
rrent, the FilipinO-American conrnunity does not have any.
Ferdie Balagtas
Cesar Candari, M.D.
Reily A. Mendoza
Robert Ricasa
Tony Plzzaro
LeoSleat Incidentally, Assemblyman Pete Chacon has introduced State
R Assembly Bill No. 2685, requiring CALTRANS to convey the
. EXECUTIVE DIRECTO property to the COPAO. He, however, needs the support of
the Chula Vista City Council considering that the subject
lot is located within the jurisdiction of Chula Vista.
Reily A. Mendoza
550 E. 8th St., Ste. 6
Should the City,(:ouncil supports us in the acquisition of this
public land, the Pilipino carrnunity would very well be on its
own way to having its own carrnunity center for which the Pilipino
pecple would have been deeply grateful.
It is our fervent hope and prayer that the Chula Vista City
Council can see its way clear to accOllllDdating this request.
~tfullY yours,
(?.f-t-C ;('tf".#r/"""
PAUL D. ONES
Chairrran
ENCLOSURE
.
National City, CA 91950
- P. O. Box 880656, San Diego, CA 92108
11"'5
.
(619) 474-1361
RESOLUTION
BY THE
EXEOJTIVE BOARD
COUNCIL OF PILIPINO-AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONS
SEEKING THE SUPPORI' OF THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CHlllA VISTA
AND MEMBERS OF THE arrJLA VISTA CITY COUNCIL IN CONNEX:T-
ION WITH A PIOCE OF PUBLIC LAND BEING ACQUIRED FR:M
THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORI'ATION DEPARlMENT BY THE
COUNCIL OF PILIPINo-AMERICAN ORGANIZATIalS
-000-
WHEREAS, the Council of Pilipino-AIrerican Organizations, also
known as "COPAO", has sought the assistance of the good offices of
Assent>lyrran Peter Chacon to acquire a piece of public land where a
Pilipino Imllticultural and senior citizen center can be build under
COPAO auspices;
WHEREAS, a piece of this public land owned by the California
Transportation Departrrent, otherwise ,known as "CALTRANS", has already
been identified jointly by the staff of Assent>lyrran Chacon and the
Departrrent of Transportation;
WHEREAS, the said parcel of land is located within the geographical
jurisdiction of the City of Chula Vista;
WHEREAS, CALTRANS, having no use of the said land, is amenable to
dispose the said property in accordance with existing law;
WHEREAS, Assent>lyrran Pete Chacon has introduced State Assent>ly
Bill No. 2685, requiring CALTRANS to convey the said property to the
Council of Pilipino-American Organizations;
WHEREAS, the passage of such legislation hinges on the full
support of the Chula Vista City Council and the California State
Departrrent of Transportatim;
NCW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, AS IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that
the Executive Board jointly with the Board of Directors of the Council
of Pilipino-American Organizations in a joint rreeting assent>led,
request the Mayor and Members of the City Council of Chula Vista to
support the passage of AB 2685;
BE IT FURI'HER RESOLVED that a copy each of this resolution be
furnished Assent>lyrran Pete Chacon and the Director of the California
Department of Transportation;
IN WITNESS WHEREDF, we hereby affixed our signatures this -30(~
day of April, 1992, in the City of National City, County of San
Diego, State of California, U.S.A.
)/-~
Paqe 2
RESOLUTION cont'd......
!It )!) (k/u----
PAUL D. ONES
Chai:rnan
~4,a~
RIZALINO A. OADES
Vice Chai:rnan
;f'&-u'c fdclud /''--''/:''''
ROSIE MAR
Secretary
~\t:y !
ERNIE RES, JR.
Public lations Officer
....
Assistant Treasurer
~t~::-d0r'-
Auditor
BOARD MEMBERS
.~ . /1 ~ ~(rU'1J
~. r/2~~7. I. .-"--..1 h.,,'') 'T/'1,.7.~..-v.",
f IL( )~~ [3C (eV 1'ONY P j
I T 'J '" /)
-, ~ /.' /-; //. .
. ". . 7-// -"/ /'
.' 4 ' /~U:.-C . ~ ~,
ffi~ u. , ILf '? . Bm~~~-< C?~~~
.;:'. "\
1tf" ;J}, .
~".~
Actg. cutive Director
11-7
/for s1P~y
PIX=:
~'1lt.'~.1 cf:)
.~'~~:~';"
o c ..: - ( . (. '" 'I
l' . 0.0 ., . ( ...
..: ....t.. I.
0(., ( ".1
~(I, ( {'....
01.: { (..
I c.: ; c..
o c . (.... . ,
u.~\"\"\.c..
o r I I' .1(';'"
(0.
nl
<..
r'H
( .
'~l
"- .
,
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 11, 1992
)
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE-1991-92 REGULAR SESSION
ASSEMBLY BILL
No. 2685
Introctuced by Assembly Member Chacon
February 13, 1992
An ~ct relating to highways.
Aa.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 2685, as amended, Chacon. Highways: disposition of
property.
Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation
to acquire real property for highway purposes, and prescribes
the manner of disposing of property acquired but not needed
for those purposes. .
This bill would require the department to choose 1 of 2
parcels of real property in the City of Chula Vista that is no
longer required for highway purposes, to convey to the
Council of Filipino-American Organizations of San Diego
County, Inc. i BftIIpeeifieEl. re&ll'r8ped~ ftt the Cetiftty ef SMt
Diega Be laRgei' re~eEl. fer ffigft.;;ay fll:H'p8~e8 .
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State~mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of Califomia do enact as follows:
1 . SECTION 1. The Department of Transportation shall
2 choose one of the following parcels of real property in the
3 City of Chula Vista that is no longer required for hight.t:ay
4 purposes, to convey to the Council of Filipino-American
5 Organizations of San Diego County, Inc. i i'eeI flr8pei'~'
6 ftt the eatiftt}' M SMt Diege wftieh ill Be laBger reEltlkeEl.
7 fe.p :higfi-JTiay pmfJ8ses, tlB fsYe-;/s..
9890
'..'v_' ~._... __ __. . "_'~'_"''''''''
AB2685
-2-
-
- ---=.
1 ~IIII:'
2 (a) Parcel No. 16864-01-01.
3 (b) Parcel No. 11360-01-04.
l O( 0
C.,I:
'. O(.n
a(l(k.
n .0, [1
11'<(
nPR:-23-' 92 THU 14: 55 lD: PETER Cl-jHCUN
_.ll:L NU:bl':J It.~--t:;)t::l..)b
++ou.;:Jr-~
PAG! 3.
D~splay 1"1-1992 Bill Teat - INFORMATION
BILL NTJJIBBRI AB 2685
Bn.L'l'U'r
INnOO'CCBD BY AssIIlmb1y Kember Chacon
FEBRUARY 13. 1992
An act zelating to hi~hYay',
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AS 2685, as introduced, Chacon. Hl~hwayel disposition of pZ'Operty.
Existing law authOriEes the Department of Transportation to acquire real
property for highway purposes. and prescribes the manner of disposing of
property acrireel :but not needed for those PU3:POS8S.
This bll would require the department to convey to the Council of
filipino-American Organizations of San Dlego county, Inc., unspecified real
propertY in the County of San Diego no longer required for highway purposes.
vote. majority. Appropriation. no. l'i8cal connittee. ye8.
State-IIanelated local program I no.
THE PEOPLE 01' THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS.
SECTION 1. The Department of Transportation shall convey to the council of
FilipinO-American Orqllnization8 of San D1ego County, Inc., real property in
the county of san Dieio which i8 no longer requirea for highway purposes, as
follows.
(a)
//"'9
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
/,;(
Meeting Date 06/02/92
SUBMITTED BY
Public Hearing to Consider Revisions to Chapter 5.20 of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code, the Cardroom Ordinance.
Chief of Police V
ITEM TITLE
REVIEWED BY
. . }
CIty Manager)
,~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..xJ
At the City Council meeting of April 28, 1992, Council received a staff report and heard public
testimony related to several proposed changes to Section 5.20 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code
known as the Cardroom Ordinance. The subject proposal was submitted by representatives of
Chula Vista's card room operators. As a result of that discussion, staff was directed to prepare
draft revisions to the Cardroom Ordinance for Council review and public comment. The
proposal is intended to assist local card room operators in remaining competitive with other
county gaming centers.
RECOMMENDATIONS: 1.
Continue the Public Hearing to June 23, 1992 to enable
staff to complete its review of the proposal, potential
impacts thereof, and to develop appropriate
recommendations related thereto for Council consideration.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: None
DISCUSSION:
Continuing today's Public Hearing will enable staff to submit a complete report, including all
appropriate recommendations on June 23, 1992. Staff is currently in the process of gathering
additional information from other jurisdictions. This information is necessary for staff to
formulate positions and to develop recommendations for Council's consideration on each of the
proposal's components.
FISCAL IMPACT: None associated with recommended actions.
I~-/
~) j'
File No.
PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST
CITY COUNCIL PUBLlC HEARING DATE \: .',Jh.' ,,) "(I C.
II r.,
, i D ,\",\ .1"" "
SUBJECT '- ;J.J.__(,:xJ\,.:~(:,.."r__ \':J -:yr'J-"-'-;,....>:_~-
LOCATION
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION" BY FAX-LL-; BY HAND_; BY MAIL
PUBLICATION DATE ':;, /,) "/-11'-
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS
NO. MAILED
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Indusuy Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK ~';' !."'~> h '"
COPIES TO:
Administration (4)
1_/
/
/
Planning 1...../
Originating Department
Engineering v
Others
City Clerk's Office (2)
/
f-/
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
.- I. I
.c;.... /,'L
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
,58,
\~. :)
NonCE OF PUBUC HEARING
BY TIIE CHULA VISfA Cl1Y COUNCIL
CHULA VISfA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public
hearing to consider the following:
Appeal of the Design Review Committee's decision to
conditionally approve the sign design for the freestanding pole
sign submitted by Firestone Real Estate proposed to be
installed @ 830 Broadway.
PCC-92-17: A request for a conditional use permit to operate
a Head Start Child Development Preschool Program @ 345
Fifth Avenue in R-3 - Zoning District - Episcopal Community
Services, South Bay Head Start.
PCC-92-34: A request for a conditional use permit to allow a
60-bed drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery center @
3 North Second Avenue in R-3 - Zoning District - Victory
Outreach.
Adopting amendments to the Cardroom Ordinance, including
but are not limited to the following: consolidation and
transferability of existing cardroom licenses; games permitted;
hours and days of operation; types of bets and wagers
permitted; charges for game playing; signage requirements;
and, other related rules and regulations. Council will consider
related amendments to the City's Master Fee Schedule.
) /
v/,/--
/" /
, ,-
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CIIT COUNCIL on Tuesday, June 2, 1992,
at 4:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at
which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED:
May 20, 1992
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
\~ 1\
NOTICE OF PUBliC HEARING
BY TIIE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA CAliFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold
a public hearing to consider the following:
Adopting amendments to Section 5.20 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, referred
to herein as the CARDROOM ORDINANCE, including but are not limited to the following:
the consolidation and transferability of existing cardroom licenses; games permitted; hours
and days of operation; types of bets and wagers permitted; charges for game playing; signage
requirements; and, other related rules and regulations. Additionally, the Council will
consider related amendments to the City's Master Fee Schedule.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on these matters in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raise at the public hearing described
in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerks Office at or prior
to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL, on
Tuesday, June 2, 1992, at 4:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276
Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: May 20,1992
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
\. r
c:\ ----.)
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
/3
Meeting Date June 2. 1992
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING PCC-92-17: A Request for a
Conditional Use Permit to Operate a Head start
Child Development Pre-school Program at 345 Fifth
Avenue in the R-3 zoning District Episcopal
community Services, South Bay Head Start
RESOLUTION 1~"I.J~P~~V)jlg PCC-92-17
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ;~~
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ (4/sths Vote: Yes___No-X-)
The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to
operate a Head Start Child Development Program (pre-school) in the
R-3 Zoning District at Grace Baptist Temple, Inc., located at 345
Fifth Avenue. Head Start will lease portions of the existing
facility to provide services to 124 children. The program will be
operated September through June with 62 children attending from
8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and 62 children attending from 12:30 p.m.
to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday. Fridays are reserved for
staff planning and staff/parent workshops.
The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study,
IS-92-10, for potential environmental impacts associated with the
implementation of the project. Based on the attached Initial Study
and comments thereon, the Coordinator has concluded that there
would be no significant environmental impacts, and recommends
adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-10.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving
PCC-92-17.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On May 13, 1992, the Planning
commission voted 7-to-0 to recommend that Council approve the
conditional use permit in accordance with Resolution PCC-92-17.
On April 20, 1992, the Resource Conservation commission voted 4-to-
o to recommend that Council adopt the Negative Declaration issued
on IS-92-10.
DISCUSSION:
Adiacent Zoninq and Land Use
Zoninq
Land Use
site
North
South
East
West
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
Church
Single Family Residential
MUlti-family Residential
Single Family Residential
Multi-family Residential
Jj"-J
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 06/02/92
J~
Existinq site Characteristics
The project setting is a 51,300 square foot rectangular parcel
bounded by single and multiple-family residential units to the
north, south, east, and west. The site is currently occupied
by three classroom structures, a church and a 79-space
blacktop parking lot. No sensitive plant or animal resources
are present on the site.
Proposed Use
South Bay Head Start currently operates six centers in the
South Bay, two in National city, two in Chula Vista, one in
Imperial Beach, and one in San Ysidro. Head start is a
federally funded program that offers medical, dental,
nutritional, mental health, social and educational services to
low income families with three to five year old children.
South Bay Head Start's proposed center in the South Bay would
lease space from Grace Baptist Temple of Chula Vista located
at 345 Fifth Avenue. However, the only service that will be
offered at this location is a pre-school.
The pre-school will have the capacity to serve 124 children,
with 62 in the morning session from 8:30 to 11:30 a.m. and 62
in the afternoon from 12:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. There will be
a total of four classes with 12 staff/parents in both the
morning and afternoon sessions. Three classes will have 15
children with one teacher, one teacher-aide, and one parent
volunteer in each session. One class will have 17 children
with one teacher, one teacher-aide, and one parent volunteer.
Pre-school classes are held Monday through Thursday and
training workshops and meetings for staff and parents are held
on Fridays. The center will be open from September through
June each year.
For the pre-school classrooms, Head start will lease the
Temple's existing ground level nursery rooms. The program
will also lease space for an office. A playground structure
will be installed in the grass area between the nursery rooms
and the Temple sanctuary. A portable fence will be used to
secure a section of the parking lot for the children's
tricycle area during hours of operation. This fencing will
also act to secure the play area so children will not be able
to leave. In addition, a chain link gate is conditioned to be
installed in the gap between the buildings at the southeast
corner of the play area.
On Fridays teacher/parent conferences and staff training are
held. The effect of this will be that the number of people
and cars will be generally lower on Fridays than on the other
days of the work week.
/:)....;.
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 06/02/92
/3
The Head start program will have sole use of the leased
facilities during hours of operation. The Temple currently
does not have any functions that would conflict with the Head
start schedule and the Temple has agreed not to schedule any
functions during Head start's hours of operation.
ANALYSIS
General Plan and Zoninq Ordinance
The project site is designated "Medium Density Residential" in
the General Plan and "Apartment-Residential" (R-3) in the
zoning Code. with conformance to the conditions of project
approval for a Conditional Use Permit, the proposed project
would be compatible with the land use designations on site.
Because Head start will be using a church site, the facility
is currently designed for nursery school use. The proposed
project will not have a significant impact on adjacent
residential uses.
Traffic/circulation/Parkinq
The present Level of Service (LOS) for Fifth Avenue is "A" and
the Average Daily Trips (ADT) are 6180. After occupancy by
the proposed project, the LOS would remain "A" and the ADT
would be 6,412 on Fifth Avenue. This change represents an
additional 232 trips per day. The total number of vehicular
trips associated with the project are considered to be less
than significant since the Level of Service will remain LOS
"A".
There are two entrances to the site off of Fifth Avenue, one
enter-only driveway toward the southwestern corner and one
exit-only driveway toward the northwestern corner. This is
considered adequate for the project.
Seventy-one parking spaces are located on-site. There will be
22 teachers, teacher aides, parent assistants and staff. This
use is similar to an elementary school, which requires one
parking space per teacher or employee plus five additional
spaces. The program will, therefore, require a minimum of 27
parking spaces. There is already adequate parking for
teachers, teacher aides, parent assistants and staff.
Drainaqe
A 10' wide by 4.5' high reinforced concrete drainage box is
adjacent to the project at the northeastern edge of the
facility. Run-off from the parking lot meets a grated inlet
at the northern edge of the property approximately 25 to 30
feet west of where the drainage pipe goes underground. This
drainage facility collects most of the surface flow from the
/3":;
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date
13
06/02/92
project site. The remainder of the water sheet flows to Fifth
Avenue where it is handled by existing storm drains.
The open drainage facility adjacent to the site poses a
potential hazard to children. Therefore, fencing along the
ditch is conditioned to be reconstructed or replaced to
preclude access to the ditch by the children.
Noise
The results of the initial study indicated that there may be
noise impacts to the neighbor immediately to the east of the
site. As a mitigation measure/conditional of approval, the
applicant is required to replace the dilapidated, aged fence
along this section of the property line with a solid fence in
order to reduce the noise impacts.
Findinqs and Conditions
The findings and conditions for approval are itemized in the
Council Resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
/:3"'1
I
I
I
, I
:
Ifl~~~
I I I II I .
I , I I I I 'I I -~ . I . I'
~uJ I I I ~ I I I I I I I I
I I I I r-, I I I I I I I I
... _.1._ +- + _1- L -t I I I I I I
I , I I I L._~_.L_J
"" __ J I I I I I I I I I
I In: I I ~ I I .
Hf- 1~f"(7r ~,Nf~ I I I -, I I I I
~ , ~f I! !!: I l
~p- :$F ,1'iF;t-1F --:-Hf " . .
I I I I ...... $'"F g /1of'~J~r
~ I~F ~:<
Nf Nf- ,~e"f ~~F
.. I A~ Hr
_______@ ~ ~l ffi if - 5f-' ~'"f---'
R-3 . ~ k.v -~F- ~F---
. . '___~ ~f ~ I~F -~f- r ur-T-
. ". . ~ ___ 2c. ~ -'1--- I I
r--- '.;r . -- )lo 1/1 I I I
~f k.e:.. ~ ~ l- ~ :,r I ~ MAif I~
"-- _ "._ I f
---- P~e:.~ Y./^y
-.... ~
" ""'"
+-IR-3
~7
T
'./-..'
ry t?T~~T
,
~
- - -- '"'\\
~
~
__o.l w l_
-- -, \ I I
. _ _ _..J \ I '-T - - - -
.,_ ,_,_.}_L J L__
I I 1\'-'-"" . -
I I I I I I ,
I' I I I r----
; . ! I I I I
I
I I
: l
i i@)
, .....
lR-2
\.. ~
CENTER-
-L
~ ""'"
\~.I)
'I
ST.
,
! ~_~t
!t_
-~I::.
_ I- _ce..
.:;f
I
-
_ _ _ t:1f:.
'-
A
I
'-------1
I
- -,---1
, I
- ---1 I
! I
I
:e:
: R-3:
I I
I I
'-"(9
.
!-
S_
..
~-
!"-
~
i.
~
"I::.PI<::~P^\.; COMH4N1iY ~\::.~VIG
~...? I 'T'H A~'
~'
NORTH [Pt&.1~.11 /1"'1~.'O)
LOCATOR
fo t'F'~1~ ^ H~D~rAIZ.T
p ~'<^~ ~~ 1~4- ~Io+IL.O~
..
C
&
'"
i.
",:<
"or
~~
~
,"
s,!
.! o.
~ -
~ ."
~~
.r
...,
,;,,,~,,;
- .
~ .
"".
",\;0\
~~
.,~
....
I::)
'u
i~
",,-
.!O~
t,};.I/,n1 '
~",.~.."E:
~
CJ
0:,,,,+'''''
.LlIt>EocC
,,' -P:...._. on _
1/1"0.
I
..
~'T_ TVCP:..
sr~:
I
; ~
I.
I~
,
!
e..," TI"" cu.SSo,""w("
o{."""II'1' ,Iol...~
~
~
, ~
~ bl
~<~
~.", ...
- t "\
~~~
>oJ
~,oJ~
Re'\ID~oJc~
LNJD~IJ.l-
~""
C '
.,. {" ;.'
'0
'0
~
""'l'oJ<j
~."
., ,
~~ .~
~
\
lil
-I
"
I
I
_ "
-
$TIJ~"'\
t,I;'~T
tolTt:'1
, t ""v""-
, CD
IUJ'~h~ ,.."",..eAtf"W
.I"
, ~
_ 6
"''''
...~
U~ .!I
eo'
.:~
,- ~
~,CO
~~
~ ~~
(,0-0'
,,'
I E.ou~I""" ,'S[OI2.T
, o6Pl. t>"!~ tio,p.,.....L'
rn
..~
" oJ...,
.....~~
"'/
lUIl"....T,...J
~.
:c
~
5"
'"
J\
~
.....
, '"
~ ~
~~
Q
:.
L1O.n..w;l.,a.iJp~
~~
._'- 5""
. I'IVC "'-..
,-". -.:-<-;:.: ~
': ~ c..Kr~ ;...;.;..:.. ~ ~:?
January 7, 1992
AMI NDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR
res SOUTH BAY HEAD START
Du~ to e:~penses r~]ated to installing a sprin~:le' syst~m and a
rle~ eyit deal" as reqlJired by the Chu)a Vlsta ~ire D~partment, we
hav(~ redesigned our proposed use of the Existing facilities
1[jc~t~0 ~t 345 5th Avenll~.
1 n t'-,f' :J;-1(J:.n~11 app.i. JCatlon we f,,.,H?rE? going to havF three Head
~,t2r t ClAssrooms in the ups-tail-s portion of the c.hu:-c.h's
cla~=rcom building. We are now moving one of T.hose classes
dOWTlstairs (15 children), and two of the classes to the other
';L'CI"" level e:'lsting classroom bui Iding <30 chi Idren).
-r!,.,." (~ttc--:C~1f'G Slt.E' plan tic.S DE'E/ii h~ghlightE:'d to ShOl"'; the 5paCE' v,;e
2i"2 C~l-!-Fntl~ proposing to utilize for Hea~ Start preschool
~.3:-->r:.:~ &r-c ciflCE.' spacE? 1 have o~so Includt?d indoCi" floor pl,:-,ns
sf t~'2 ~lassroom~s) spacE.
1/ ,'7
eV ,{,. f 1 ~(,,(. I/l {_.'
~_ ." I' ,.. 1-
RECEIVED
"_'~r .;:':-i;::; c-f {::::i.Jt:i :=-;2r'~'icp-:--,
J' t\ ~,1Qn';
/{,. I ,~J<'
PLANNING
13"7
.. -.--
- - ArN :
_..~
~X1~~-~{ :J2~-~ -~~~~~-~~~i ~~~
. -, .~.:- c:::'~r,ANc.-r--- ~ - ~Go>- ~ -: -A ~>2.1 AUPI1,,~tJt1
.- - 0.. ",,",,_ -,... ' ~.~. c::;.' ..l!.b."'~~
.... r"vv~-W' , ~ -/1' ~""""""'I~-r;;
, ' : .~t:?G-rt? r~.~rz::;.~~~
.- - - ~-I~~-'-_:--=-:-~'-A:-:}-~:~-J-~'~ (b fj~'~ -:
- ~/~~UP~ ' ~t? r::;- ;-~-~ - -. ---. -".
_L .'1 _ _ _ --- ~~-~ ~ -- --'-1_-- ---- --- - -- -- - -_-.
- ~L~' - ---- ~- ~W6'1-t:' " -='..J;o~ ~-_:. - -
__: .~O ~~--:f~-';:~":~"--r:::',li-~...... ~ __--- : --
~ ~~~ - -,- - -~-.---------;- . ;.-
:~"':.:;'--'-~Jb'\ ---- -- _-.=.y:~,4G,~t=~f .. ----:----..----'q
__._ ~~-.:: ~ _.::.-.-:::,. ~7 ~1 -:_:=:':::::'=-.:::-:_: - ,_ ____u._
_ _._._; _ (/_q _ .:...::__ it _~-,-,?~ - . _ -------
:__ . -- ; _t::'---~---:. ;".-:=::t'i72.00=.' ---- - - '- --- -
__ _I _1"~--~-~--lI.J~.1-4~/(7_~
=-=. ~X1e-rI~ ~--;:-r:rfe:~"_]-f+otJ~ - (~I-J. e,neJNI~~).
q ~:""~I .oA~II'''''' ---------
- ~.""l & Tr'l'f- 1'Cl'_ ,------- ---
.::.::---- ---~t:'I~-q#! '.'2- ... - - .::-.--
~..........I~~~ ~..J.~. - -. --------. .-...
.. _.~-~-~.;.",I~~,...-""" ~~.:~ ~ -1-- - . - h_ --,., - .-
_:.~-.::~~:.:::~.~----:_- --- 13~Y--
.
:.~,..
:--- --.~~~:: 6~~ta:1"~
--;- . --'_: - ~~ ~11-t Ave; -
_H' -_ . - --,- /_J"t..lv~ V1~A /A. AIl~I.....
-,- - . - ----. Vl'TV '''I' I ~ -I IC/
I - - -
. Ap:orUvAH-r ~:...~~~:cc::t1HW.JTrT _:'~~~--.
- i l-~-~~~A~'"
-oj Itrn ~~A~ ~tf
-'auLA v~""" c.~ 4~11
~~ M~L.U...Jo ~"2.-I~.z.
- - ; ~ b-"-/"e>-:Z . O(p .
.. ~+~ ~~ AV";::', 1~~V1~^.
~'..o'
~\;.
i .'~.eH'
~1{'
~~b
WIt'
l?x1~b
(~r~JLJM) .
t-.l?f"'f'~
'"
t
&.
Il:\
-'.
~
~
,
.J *~~
.~~
If:t ~_ IAI ...... lta..,l
.
=~~---
~~ _ .~~V1t1rr t>f ~
"
'"
l~~
(,
~ll\
.. ." ~NI"'"
l:>lJ
.
'+
~
o
...
'"
I
~q,.~r1:Z'I-i
-J~~~~~)
i J ~~Cl
~,,~
r
11111111111
.
1:1 "' i'
".
n
~
.
.
~.
~~
'~~-
I
I
i
I,
"
I
!:
, .
,
.,. i;
+ 'W,
" ~
~~-~
J
! I
~ , .
lU?l~ L-lt111" ~f ~1'"
~ '
"
..
'1' 'U,!oll
t
"
I'
i
.
~
-'
-:s
'fiflwr'b
, 14~
,.tI-l"rA~
, ~XtdGr~,* ~.~Nb
...::' ~1i1:lo~ ~,~ .,..
", ~..
"'-'''-!10-.:,..'1 .
f>!ol~ I II
, I _.ltP-,e.
I
:
/j-/P
, I I
'~,'~'~"~
RESOLUTION NO.
I"/Pl/~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO OPERATE A HEAD START CHILD DEVELOPMENT PRE-
SCHOOL PROGRAM AT 345 FIFTH AVENUE IN THE R-3
ZONING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting a conditional use
permit in order to operate a Head Start Child Development Program
(pre-school) in the R-3 Zoning District at Grace Baptist Temple,
Inc., located at 345 Fifth Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator conducted
an Initial Study, IS-92-10, for potential environmental impacts
associated with the implementation of the project and has concluded
that there would be no significant environmental impacts, and
recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-10;
and
WHEREAS, on May 13, 1992, the Planning commission voted
7-to-0 to recommend that Council approve the conditional use permit
in accordance with Resolution PCC-92-17; and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 1992, the Resource Conservation
commission voted 4-to-0 to recommend that Council adopt the
Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-10.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby find as follows:
1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary
or desirable to provide a service or facility which
will contribute to the general well being of the
neighborhood or the community.
The conditional approval of PCC-92-17 is necessary and
desirable in order to provide a service which will
contribute to the general public well being in that the
applicant will provide the opportunity for a child care
facility at a convenient location for a greater number of
families within the neighborhood and community.
2. That such use will not under the circumstances of
the particular case, be detrimental to the health,
safety or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the vicinity or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity.
1
IJ, "'/)
The conditional approval of PCC-92-17 will not, under the
circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to
the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing
or working int he vicinity or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity in that a noise study by the
city Acoustician has shown that the project requires
minor changes in order to comply with city noise
standards, and the project site contains adequate on-site
parking for both employees and clients.
3.
That the proposed use will comply with
regulations and conditions specified in the
for such use.
the
code
The conditional approval of PCC-92-17 requires compliance
with all conditions and applicable codes and regulations
prior to the issuance of any permit or occupancy of any
facility on the site for the proposed project.
4.
Tha t the
will not
City or
agency.
granting of this conditional use permit
adversely affect the General Plan of the
the adopted plan of any governmental
The granting of PCC-92-17 will not adversely affect the
General Plan in that the designation of the property
allows for child day care facilities upon the approval of
a conditional use permit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby
adopts this resolution granting the conditional use permit, subject
to the following conditions:
1. The program shall not exceed a maximum enrollment
of 124 children, with 62 children attending from
8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and 62 children attending
from 12:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., with no more than
four 45-minute outdoor play periods per day, each
involving no more than approximately 31 children,
Monday through Thursday, without first obtaining
the prior written approval of the Zoning
Administrator.
2. An emergency fire plan shall be posted in
appropriate locations throughout the facility to
the satisfaction of the Fire Department and shall
include:
a. The emergency number (911) and the Fire
Department phone number (691-5055).
2
J3"J,^
b.
The name of
responsibility
Department.
the
for
person (s)
calling
assigned
the Fire
c. Evacuation routes leading to safe dispersal
areas. Said dispersal areas shall be located
not less than 50 feet from any buildings on
the site. Dispersal areas shall be sized to
provide an area of not less than three (3)
square feet per occupant. In the event of a
fire or during a drill, each teacher shall
take the class roll book in order to call roll
once the evacuation is complete. The roll
book shall be maintain in an up-to-date order.
d. Monthly fire drills.
3. The following shall be complied with to the
satisfaction of the Fire Marshal:
a. All exits to the outside shall be equipped
with "panic hardware". This hardware shall be
within the reach of the children. These doors
shall open from the inside without the use of
a key or any special knowledge.
b. No flammable liquids shall be placed, stored
or used in Group-E occupancies.
c. A halogenated and dry chemical or other
special fire-extinguishing system may be
required by the Fire Department upon occupancy
of the facility per section 10.301(B) of the
Fire Code.
4. The sandbox area shall be located within the
courtyard created by the classroom and sanctuary
structures. No sandbox/play area shall be located
between the eastern-most buildings and the east
property line.
5. Fencing along the northeastern and eastern property
lines shall be reconstructed or replaced to six
feet. Specifically, along the drainage channel the
fence shall be constructed in such a way as to
preclude entry to the drainage area by children.
All fencing shall completely enclose the property
such that no gaps exist in the fencing which may
allow access to the property from neighboring
parcels. All fencing shall be reconstructed or
3
13- 11
replaced to the satisfaction of the Fire Department
and the Director of Planning.
6. The open area at the northeast corner shall be
fenced off from the rest of the property so as to
preclude entry by children. Fencing shall be
placed between the northern-most building housing
the nursery at its northeast corner and the
northern fence at that location, to the
satisfaction of the Fire Department and the
Director of Planning.
7. A chain link gate/fence at least four feet in
height shall be installed in the gap between the
buildings at the southeast corner of the play area
so as to secure entry to the rear of the buildings
by the children.
8. This conditional use permit shall become void and
ineffective if not utilized within one year from
the effective date thereof, in accordance with
section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure
to comply with any condition of approval shall
cause this permit to be reviewed by the City for
additional conditions or revocation.
9. This permit shall be subject to any and all new,
modified, or deleted conditions imposed after
adoption of this resolution to advance a legitimate
governmental interest related to health, safety or
welfare which City shall impose after advance
written notice to the permittee and after the City
has given to the permittee the right to be heard
with regard thereto. However, the City, in
exercising this reserved right/condition, may not
impose a substantial expense or deprive Permittee
of a substantial revenue source which the Permittee
can not, in the normal operation of the use
permitted, be expected to economically recover.
10. This conditional use permit shall be subi ect to
revocation. modification. or fine in lieu of
revocation. upon a determination bv the issuinq
authoritv. to-wit: the citv Council. that the
permittee or their successors in interest have used
the subiect premises in excess of the authority
herein qranted or that the terms and conditions of
this permit have in anv wav been violated.
reqardless of cause. or that the continued use of
this permit is iniurious to the health. safetv or
welfare of the communitv.
4
1:3-11
Presented by
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
C:\rs\head start
5
)3'/5 /lj-~5
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-92-17
A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL GRANT
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE
A HEAD START CHILD DEVELOPMENT PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAM
AT 345 FIFTH AVENUE IN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use
permit was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula
vista on October 1, 1991 by Episcopal Community Services, south Bay
Head start; and
WHEREAS, said application requested a conditional use permit
in order to operate a Head start Child Development Program (pre-
school) in the R-3 Zoning District at Grace Baptist Temple, Inc.,
located at 345 Fifth Avenue in order to provide services to 124
children (62 in the a.m. and 62 in the p.m.); and
WHEREAS, the Planning commission set the time and place for a
hearing on said conditional use permit application and notice of
said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and
its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as
advertised, namely 7:00 p.m., on May 13, 1992 in the Council
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning commission and
said hearing was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the Commission found that the project
significant environmental impacts and adopted
Declaration issued on IS-92-10.
would have no
the Negative
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
finds as follows:
1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or
desirable to provide a service or facility which will
contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or
the community.
The conditional approval of PCC-92-17 is necessary and
desirable in order to provide a service which will contribute
to the general public well being in that the applicant will
provide the opportunity for a child care facility at a
convenient location for a greater number of families within
the neighborhood and community.
2. That such use will not under the circumstances ot the
particular case, be detriJllental to the health, safety or
I] ~ l7
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-92-17
MAY 13, 1992
PAGE 2
general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity
or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity.
The. conditional approval of PCC-92-17 will not, under the
circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the
health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or
working int he vicinity or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity in that a noise study by the city
Acoustician has shown that the project requires minor changes
in order to comply with City noise standards, and the project
site contains adequate on-site parking for both employees and
clients.
3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and
conditions specified in the code for such use.
The conditional approval of PCC-92-17 requires compliance with
all conditions and applicable codes and regulations prior to
the issuance of any permit or occupancy of any facility on the
site for the proposed project.
4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan of the City or the adopted
plan of any governmental agency.
The granting of PCC-92-17 will not adversely affect the
General Plan in that the designation of the property allows
for child day care facilities upon the approval of a
conditional use permit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the City Council adopt a resolution granting the conditional
use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1. The program shall not exceed a maximum enrollment of 124
children, with 62 children attending from 8:00 a.m. to 11:30
a.m. and 62 children attending from 12:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.,
with no more than four 45-minute outdoor play periods per day,
each involving no more than approximately 31 children, Monday
through Thursday, without first obtaining the prior written
approval of the Zoning Administrator.
2. An emergency fire plan shall be posted in appropriate
locations throughout the facility to the satisfaction of the
Fire Department and shall include:
a. The emergency number (911) and the Fire Department phone
number (691-5055).
b. The name of the person(s) assigned responsibility for
calling the Fire Department.
J3~JW
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-92-17
MAY 13, 1992
PAGE 3
c. Evacuation routes leading to safe dispersal areas. Said
dispersal areas shall be located not less than 50 feet
from any buildings on the site. Dispersal areas shall be
sized to provide an area of not less than three (3)
square feet per occupant. In the event of a fire or
during a drill, each teacher shall take the class roll
book in order to call roll once the evacuation is
complete. The roll book shall be maintain in an up-to-
date order.
d. Monthly fire drills.
3. The following shall be complied with to the satisfaction of
the Fire Marshal:
a. All exits to the outside shall be equipped with "panic
hardware". This hardware shall be within the reach of
the children. These doors shall open from the inside
without the use of a key or any special knowledge.
b. No flammable liquids shall be placed, stored or used in
Group-E occupancies.
c. A halogenated and dry chemical or other special fire-
extinguishing system may be required by the Fire
Department upon occupancy of the facility per section
10.301(B) of the Fire Code.
4. The sandbox area shall be located within the courtyard created
by the classroom and sanctuary structures. No sandbox/play
area shall be located between the eastern-most buildings and
the east property line.
5. Fencing along the northeastern and eastern property lines
shall be reconstructed or replaced to six feet. Specifically,
along the drainage channel the fence shall be constructed in
such a way as to preclude entry to the drainage area by
children. All fencing shall completely enclose the property
such that no gaps exist in the fencing which may allow access
to the property from neighboring parcels. All fencing shall
be reconstructed or replaced to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department and the Director of Planning.
6. The open area at the northeast corner shall be fenced off from
the rest of the property so as to preclude entry by children.
Fencing shall be placed between the northern-most building
housing the nursery at its northeast corner and the northern
fence at that location, to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department and the Director of Planning.
1:~/5'
~.
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-92-17
MAY 13, 1992
PAGE 4
7. A chain link gate/fence at least four feet in height shall be
installed in the gap between the buildings at the southeast
corner of the play area so as to secure entry to the rear of
the buildings by the children.
8. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective
if not utilized within one year from the effective date
thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal
Code. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall
cause this permit to be reviewed by the city for additional
conditions or revocation.
9. This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified, or
deleted conditions imposed after adoption of this resolution
to advance a legitimate governmental interest related to
health, safety or welfare which City shall impose after
advance written notice to the permittee and after the city has
given to the permittee the right to be heard with regard
thereto. However, the City, in exercising this reserved
right/condition, may not impose a substantial expense or
deprive Permittee of a substantial revenue source which the
Permittee can not, in the normal operation of the use
permitted, be expected to economically recover.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant
and the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 13th day of May, 1992 by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES:
Commissioners Carson, Casillas, Fuller, Martin, Decker,
Tuchscher and Tugenberg
NOES:
None
ABSENT:
None
Susan Fuller, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
/]<20
UNOFFDCIAL MINUTE~
EXCERPT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF 5/13/92
ITEM 1:
PUBLIC HEARING - PCC-92-17; REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO OPERATE A HEAD START CHILD DEVELOPMENT PRE-
SCHOOL PROGRAM AT 345 FIFTH A VENUE - Episcopal Community
Services, South Bay Head Start
Associate Planner Miller presented the staff report, and recommended adoption of the Negative
Declaration issued on IS-92-10. Staff also recommended that the Planning Commission adopt
a motion recommending approval to the City Council of PCC-92-17, subject to the conditions
outlined in the staff report or as modified or replaced.
Commissioner Decker, referring to condition 'e', pointed out that halogen was being phased out
of use as a fire suppressant because it damages the ozone layer. Mr. Miller replied that the
words "to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal" could be added to the condition in case of a phase
out or Code change.
Commissioner Decker asked for an explanation of the use of the portable fence. Mr. Miller
explained the use and the area in which it would be used. He said it was a chainlink fence and
was on wheels.
Commissioner Decker commented there was a 3: 1 ratio of staff and students and commended
the school.
Commissioner Tugenberg asked about the previous concern of adjacent homeowners regarding
noise and asked if an acoustical wall had been required. Assistant Planning Director Lee
concurred, but said no complaints had been received. Senior Planner Griffin stated that the
second floor area was restricted from any type of classroom activity and was for office only.
That seemed to satisfy any concerns of the neighbors at the time the second story was built.
Commissioner Martin questioned the traffic circulation and traffic, and if the LOS A took into
consideration the development of the hospital a few blocks away, and asked if the LOS would
change. The data was not readily available.
In reply to Commissioner Carson, Assistant City Attorney Rudolf stated a time limit would not
be necessary; the conditional use permit would be subject to review in the event there were
violations, and would be revoked if there were violations. If there were no violations, there
would be no need to reconsider it.
/3 <~ !
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Gene Merlino, 1470 Seacoast Drive, #B, Imperial Beach 91932 (Director of Youth Services for
Episcopal Community Services), representing the applicant, supported the Head Start Program.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Martin stated that he supported the program, but requested projected cumulative
traffic impact when considering future projects.
MSUC (Tugenberg/Carson) 7-0 to adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-10.
MSUC (Tugenberg/Carson) 7-0 to recommend to Council approval of PCC-92-17 subject to
conditions a through I, as amended.
/J /J--J
MINUTES OF A SCHEDULED REGULAR MEETING
Resource Conservation Commission
Chula Vista, California
6:00 p.m.
Monday, April 20, 1992
Conference Room 1
Public Services Building
CALL MEETING TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: Meeting was called to order with a quorum at 6:21
p.m. by Chairperson Hall. City Staff Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid called roll.
Present: Commissioners Fox, Ray and Kracha. Absent: Ghougassian and Johnson. Jackie
McQuade had submitted her resignation from RCC. leaving one vacancy.
,
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: With the resignation of McQuade. minutes of the meeting of March
9, 1992 cannot be approved as there is no longer a quorum from that meeting.
The minutes of March 23, 1992 were not approved due to lack of quorum present from that
meeting. Continue to next meeting of May 11, 1992.
NEW BUSINESS:
1.
Review of Negative Declaration IS-92-10. ECS So. Bay Head Start - comments
included Hall's concern of the inspection and maintenance of the fence around the I
drainage ditch. It should be inspected not less than once a quarter and be maintained I
by the city. It is further suggested that the Mitiaation Necessarv to Avoid Sianificant i
Effects (Page 5, Number F-2) should read: "The opening between structures on the
east side of the site shall be closed off by shrubbery ~ a wooden gate." After brief
discussion. it was then MSUP (Kracha/Fox) to accept the Mitigated Negative Dee with
the additional noted comments on the maintenance of the drainage ditch and the
change of wording noted above; motion carried 4-0. ( ,
I
i \
l
2. Review of Negative Declaration IS-92-20. Rollerskateland - Comments included the
following: On Page 1, Paragraph A: Change the word "flaunted" to "bounded". Ray
expressed concern of possible graffiti and the need for security in the area. It was
suggested that Rollerskateland seek permission to use the Office Depot parking lot tor
its overflow during non-business hours. and avoid parking on the streets. It was then
MSUP (Fox/Ray) to approve the Negative Declaration; motion carried 4-0.
3. Review of Negative Declaration IS-92-29. Hazard/KolI 5th And C Street - There were
several significant environmental impacts noted on Pages 3-4 requiring mitigation.
After brief discussion, it was MSUP (Kracha/Fox) to approve the Mit; ted Negative
Declaration subject to the Mitiaation Necessarv to Avoid Sianificant Effects as stated
on Pages 4-5: motion carried 4-0.
4. In an attempt to set a hearing date for Historical District Ordinance. John Kracha
announced he will be absent May 11 to the end qf June, Due to an RCC vacancy, it
was requested of Staff to request the City Council to appoint a new member as soon
as possible for a quorum at meetings, In the meantime. a hearing date was tentatively
set for May 18. 1992 on the Historical District Ordinance.
J] ~c23
MAIL TO:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista. CA ,92010
Attn: Doug Reid
f2 n I!.-
lr Annelle J. Evans. ~Ierk @
f \loncE APR 0 2 1992
OF PROPQ~ED NEGATIVE DECLARATION BY
(FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT)
nEOllTY
.
".-..
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Chula Vista is considering a
recOIIIlIendation that the project herein identified will have no significant
environmental impact in compliance with Section 15070 of State CEQA
guidelines. A copy of the Negative Declaration (finding of no significant
impact) and the Initial Study. which supports the proposed findings. are on
file in the Chula Vista Planning Department. 276 Fourth Avenue. Chula Vista.
CA 92010. These documents are available for public review between the hours
of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.. Monday through Friday.
Anyone wishing to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration should provide
their written cOl111lents to the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth
Avenue. Chula Vista, CA 92010.
This proposed finding does not constitute approval or denial of the project
itself; it ~. determines if the project could have significant environmental
impact. ProJects which could have significant impact must have an
Environmental Impact Report prepared to evaluate those possible impacts in
compliance with Section 15064 of State CEQA Guidelines.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this Negative Declaration in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised in written correspondence.
For further information concerning this project, including public hearing
dates, please contact Martin Miller at (619) 691-5101.
This noti ce is requi red to be f11 ed wi th
period of not less than thirtv (30) days.
. .
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUr~BER: 568-182-06
PROJECT LOCATION: 345 Fifth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910
the County Clerk's office for a
,
PR~E~T DESCRIPTION: The project proposes to use an existin9 Church Sunday-school
faclllty to operate a pre-school for 3-5 year old children. The center wil serve
J24 children in two shifts of 62 children in each. The center will operate from
8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. September through June. The facility. has 79 existing parking
SpafF'S.
DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY: City of Chula Vista 'VIA..~
INITIAL STUDY: 15-92-10
I
DAT~: March 19, 1992
/3' -",2 L!
RECEIVED
rc:DD.~m\
Jr Annelle J Evans, Clerk ill;
MAIL TO: City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA .92010
Attn: Doug Reid
:-t.. ';-. '18q'
JAN 0 ? 199?
BY Q~ -p"c.....Jl>
"tDIITY -
f ~OTICE
OF PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT)
PLANNING
.
...~ .
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Chula Vista is considering a
recommendation that the project herein identified will have no significant
environmental impact in compliance with Section 15070 of State CEQA
guidelines. A copy of the Negative Declaration (finding of no significant
impact) and the Initial Study, which supports the proposed findings, are on
file in the Chula Vista Planning Department. 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista,
CA 92010. These documents are available for public review between the hours
of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Anyone wishing to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration should provide
their written comments to the Chula Vista Planning Depar.tment, 276 Fourth
Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
This proposed finding does not constitute approval or denial of the project
itself; it ~ determines if the project could have significant environmental
impact. Pi'03icts which could have significant impact must have an
Environmental Impact Report prepared to eval uate those possibl e impacts in
compliance with Section 15064 of State CEQA Guidelines.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this Negative Declaration in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised in written correspondence.
,
For further information concerning this project, including public hearing
dates, please contact Maryann Millerat (619) 691-5101.
Thi s noti ce is requi red to be f11 ed wi th the County Cl erk I s offi ce for a
period of not less than thirty.(30) days.
ASSESSOR I S PARCEL NUr1BER: 568-182-06
PROJECT LOCATION: 345 Fifth Avenue, Grace Baptist Temple
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: South Bay Head Start proposes to lease existing classroom
space from Grace Baptist Temple to operate a Head Start
Preschool Program for 3-5 year old children at 345 Fifth Ave.
DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY: Chula Vista Planning Commission
IIIITIAL STUDY 110. 15-92-10
DATE: 12-10-91
Ell 7 (Rev, 1/90)
WPC 0006Y
VY\~
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK,
SAN DIEGO COU':( ON ~AN 0 2 1992
pom6.!.AN C 2 199L_~ P~~0\'C:0 ~.
RETURNED TO AGENCY ON 0/<1 My
DEPUTY an. r " 9"'=-6'_
-
r3 / )~(
mitigated negative declaration
PROJECT NAME: South Bay Head Start, Grace Baptist Church, Conditional Use
Permit Application, PCC-92-17
PROJECT LOCATION: 345 Fifth Avenue
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 568-182-06
PROJECT APPLICANT: Episcopal Community Services South Bay Head Start
CASE NO: 15.92.10
DATE: March 19,1992
A. Proiect Settina
The project setting is a 51,300 square foot rectangular parcel bounded by
single and multiple-family residential units to the north, south, east,
and west. The site is currently occupied by three classroom structures, a
church and a 79-space blacktop parkin9 lot. No sensitive plant or animal
resources are present on the site.
B. Proiect Descriotion
South Bay Head Start currently operates six centers in the South Bay, two
in National City, two in Chula Vista, one in Imperial Beach, and one in
San Ysidro. Head Start is a federally funded program that offers medical,
dental, nutritional, mental health, social and educational services to low
income families with three to five year old children. South Bay Head
Start's proposed center in the South Bay would lease space from the Grace
Baptist Temple of Chula Vista located at 345 Fifth Avenue.
The center wi 11 have the capac ity to serve 124 ch i 1 dren, wi th 62 in the
morning session from 8:30 to 11:30 a.m. and 62 in the afternoon from 12:30
p.m. to 4:00 p.m. There will be a total of four classes. Three classes
wi 11 have 15 ch i 1 dre11 with one teacher, one teacher- a i de, and one parent
volunteer in each session. One class will have 17 children with one
teacher, one teacher-a ide, and one parent vol unteer. Preschool classes
are held Monday through Thursday and tra in i ng workshops and meeti ngs for
staff and parents are held on Fridays. The center will be open from
September through June each year.
For the preschool classrooms, Head Start will lease the Temple's existing
ground 1 evel nursery rooms. The program wi 11 also 1 ease space for an
office. A playground structure will be installed in the grass area
between the nursery rooms and the Temple sanctuary. A portable fence will
be used to secure a section of the parking lot for the children's tricycle
a~ea during hours of operation.
On Fridays the number of people and cars will be generally lower than
Monday through Thursday wi th the except i on of 1-3 days per year when an
open house event is held. Traffic associated with larger events will
generally occur during non-peak hours. ~{~
-.-
~~L, ~-~
7'" ~~~~
city of chula vllta planning department CTTY Of
environmental review aectlon (HULA VISTA
-2-
The Head Start program will have sole use of the leased facilities during
hours of operation. The Temple currently does not have any functions that
would conflict with the Head Start schedule and the Temple has agreed not
to schedule any functions during Head Start's hours of operation.
C. ComDatibilitv with Zoninq and Plans
The project site is designated "Medium Density Residential" in the General
Plan and "Apartment-Residential" (R-3) in the Zoning Code. With
conformance to the conditions of project approval for a Conditional Use
Permit, the proposed project would be compatible with the land use
designations on site. The site is currently designed for nursery school
use and the proposed project will not have a significant impact on
adjacent residential uses.
D. ComDliance with the Threshold/Standards Policv
1. Fi re/EMS
The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that fire and medical units
must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less. in 85% of
the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City
of Chul a Vi sta has i ndi cated that thi s threshol d standard will be
met, since the nearest fire station is 1/4 mile away and would be
associated with a 2 minute response time. The proposed project will
comply with this Threshold Policy.
State fire codes classify the proposed child care center as a Group
E, Division 3 Occupancy. Title 24, Section 302(c) does not allow
daycare facilities above the first story unless they are protected by
a sprinkler system and there are at least two exits directly to the
outside. In compliance with this regulation, the project space does
not propose classroom space on the second story.
The Fire Department requires that all fire systems including fire
ext i ngui shers and smoke alarms be cert i fi ed by a properly 1 icensed
agency as meeting all Code requirements. Other requirements include:
a. A certified fire suppression system to protect cooking surfaces.
b. Monthly fire drills.
c. Posting of an emergency pre-fire plan which includes:
Evacuation routes to a publ ic way, instructions for teachers
(teachers shall remove roll book from classroom to call roll and
shall maintain order during evacuation).
d. A safe dispersal area providing 3 square feet per person located
not less than 50 feet from buildings.
2. Pol ice
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must
respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes or less and
maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5
J3-~7
-3-
minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2
calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time
to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Policy.
The Pol ice Department has indicated they will be able to provide an
adequate level of service to this project.
3. Traffic
The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that all intersections must
operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception
that Level of Service (LOS) "0" may occur during the peak two hours
of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of I-80S
are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection
may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour.
Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this
policy. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy.
The existing Level of Service (LOS) for Fifth Avenue is "A" and the
Average Daily Trips (ADT) are 6180. After implementation of the
proposed project, the LOS would remain "A" and the ADT would be 6,412
on Fifth Avenue. This change represents an additional 232 trips per
day.
4. Parks/Recreation
The Threshol d/Standards Pol icy for Parks and Recreat i on is 3
acres/l,OOO population. This policy applies only to residential
projects, therefore, it is exempt from this threshold standard.
5. Drainage
The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that storm water flows and
volumes not exceed City Engineer Standards. Individual projects will
provide necessary improvements cons i stent wi th the Ora i nage Master
Pl an (s) and Ci ty Engi neeri ng Standards. The proposed project wi 11
comply with this Threshold Policy.
The project is adjacent to a 10'x4.S' reinforced concrete box and the
eastern portion of the drainage facility is an open ditch. Run-off
meets a grated inlet at the northern edge of the property where the
drainage pipe goes underground. This drainage facility collects most
of the surface flow from the project site. The remainder of the
water sheets off to Fifth Avenue where it is handled by existing
storm drains.
The open drainage facil ity on site may pose a potential hazard to
children, unless access to the ditch is restricted through fencing or
other requirements. (See Section E.)
13~~'
-4-
6. Sewer
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that sewage flows and volumes
shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects
will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master
Plan{s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will
comply with this Threshold Policy.
The existing 12" vitrified clay pipe in Fifth Avenue is adequate to
serve the proposed project.
7. Water
The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that adequate storage,
treatment, and transmission facil ities are constructed concurrently
with planned growth and that water quality standards are not
jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Policy.
The proposed sHe is in an establ i shed urban area. Water suppl i es
are adequate to meet existing threshold standards. Potentially
significant water impacts will be discussed in more detail in Section
E of this document.
E. Identification of Environmental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista determined that the
proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect, and the
preparat i on of an Envi ronmental Impact Report will not be requi red. A
Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of
the State CEQA Guidelines.
The following impacts have been determined to be less than significant. A
discussion of each of these less than significant impacts from the
proposed project follows.
H.llir
Due to recent drought conditions, as a condition of project approval, the
applicant must agree to no net increase in water consumption or
participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City
of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Human Health
A 10' foot deep concrete drainage channel occurs on the northern edge of
this site. Accidental access to this drainage facility by children could
create a potential health and safety impact. Maintenance of the fencing
to prevent ch il dren from access i ng the channel will be a cond i t i on of
approval in the Conditional Use Permit for this project.
I~'~'
-5-
Traffic
Primary access to the site is from Fifth Avenue. There is one existing
access point to the site. This project is expected to generate 232
Average Daily Trips (ADT) , primarily occurring during the hours of: 8:00
and 8:15 a.m.; 11:30 and 11:45 a.m.; 12:30 and 12:45 p.m.; and 4:30 and
4:45 p.m.
The total number of vehicular trips associated with the project are
considered to be less than significant since the Level of Service will
remain LOS A. .
N2.ill
The project is expected to generate potential noi se impacts associated
with children playing during outdoor play periods. The outdoor noise
limit for multi-family residences as set forth in the Municipal Code
(Section 19.68.030) is 60 dBA. The school proposes four 45-minute outdoor
play periods with approximately 31 children outdoors at a given time.
Based on the findings of a noise study conducted by the city acoustician,
outdoor play periods are expected to generate approximately 68 to 81 dBA.
It is the opinion of the City Acoustician that the layout of this site
will act as a noise buffer between the outdoor play area and surrounding
residences. The proposed play area is surrounded on the north, south and
east by classroom structures which will provide a significant noise
buffer. In addition, Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code requires that
multi-family residences be constructed so that interior noise levels
attributable to exterior sources shall not exceed 45 dBA in an habitable
room. This construction requirement will reduce the impacts of noise from
the project on adjacent multi-family residences. The proposed site plan
for the outdoor play area includes a sand area on the southeast corner of
the site adjacent to single family residences. Relocation of this area to
space within the structural noise buffer is required to reduce noise
impacts to residences. Replacement of the sand area with a noise buffer
(i.e. shrubbery or a wooden gate) will further reduce noise impacts. The
west side of the project is set back approximately 250 feet from Fifth
Avenue, therefore, noise volumes will decrease before reaching the
multi-family residences across Fifth Avenue. Due to the site design,
noise impacts are deemed to be less than significant.
F. Mitiaation necessary to avoid sianificant effects
To reduce impacts associated with noise from outdoor child's play, the
following measures shall be implemented:
1. The sandbox area shall be located within the courtyard created by the
classroom and sanctuary structures.
2. The opening between structures on the east side of the site shall be
closed off by shrubbery or a wooden gate.
/3-..1IJ
-6-
G. FindinQs of InsiQnificant ImDact
Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project
described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no
environmental impact report needs to be prepared.
1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels. threaten to eli.inate a plant or ani.al
cOlllllunity. reduce the nulllber or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or ani.al. or eli.inate illportant examples of the
.ajor periods of California history or prehistory.
The proposed project does not have the potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the natural environment. The site is
currently developed and no endangered pl ant or animal species are
present. There are no cultural or historic resources on the site.
Z. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental
goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals.
The proposed Conditional Use Permit will not achieve short-term
envi ronmental goal s at the expense of long-term envi ronmental goal s
since long-term goals will be achieved through compl iance with the
conditions of project approval. CUP compliance will ensure the
consistency of this project with the General Plan.
3. The project has possible effects which are individually limited but
cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, "cumulatively
considerable" lIeans that the incremental effects of an individual
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other current projects. and the
effects of probable future projects.
The proposed project will not result in any significant adverse
environmental effects which are cumulative in nature, provided all
conditions of project approval are met. The preschool is expected to
serve low and moderate income chil dren from the surroundi ng
neighborhood. The project is not expected to result in secondary
impacts or to have a growth inducing impact.
4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings. either directly or indirectly.
No environmental impacts known to cause adverse effects on human
beings either directly or indirectly were identified in the initial
study. No publ i cheal th impacts resulting from thi s project were
identified.
13'3/
-7-
H. Consultation
1. Individuals and Oroanizations
City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering
John Lippitt, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Bob Sennett, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building and Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Shauna Stokes, Parks and Recreation Department
Georgia Rubin, Planning
Bill Morton, Communications
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent: Gene Merlino
1687 Third Avenue, Suite H
Chula Vista, CA 91911
2. Documents
Title 19, City of Chula Vista Municipal Code
Title 24, Uniform Building Code
General Plan, City of Chula Vista
3. Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial
Study, any comments recei ved on the Init i a 1 Study and any comments
received during the publ ic review period for the Negative
Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review
of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning
Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
~~~.~
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR
EN 6 (Rev. 12/90)
WPC 9949P
J?J-;:J.
FOR OFFICE USE
INITIAL STUDY
Case No. \s -qZ-ID
Fee \...\A
Recei pt No. l-J A-
Da te Rec' d Ie', - I - (1 J.=
Accepted byex:,( hellO, 'Re d
Project No. r:- A <j <+7
City of Chula Vista
Application Form
A. BACKGROUND
A.
(Street address
l.
2.
PROJECT TITLE j
PROJECT LOCATION
3.
4. Name of Applicant
Address -{ ~
City c.k,J, \J .. .,,-l-rA State C c.-
5. Name of Pre parer/ Agent hi' ,"If me r (A 1\..0
Address lit" ~I 6rd Avt ':;'l\.~ h H
Ci ty t.l vt\{, U 15+0.. State (Co.
Relation to Applicant f,,,,, plc'1u/
~+wt
.L/;):) J{" ~/ ;:).
Zip q,q 1/
Phone "/;;';;' 1& <j;J,
Zip 111/J
6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents
required by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
a. Permits or approvals required:
General Plan Revision
Rezoning/Prezoning
Precise Plan
--- Specific Plan
+ Condo Use Permi t
Vari ance
Design Review Committee Public Project
--- Tentative Subd. Map Annexation
--- Grading Permit Design Review Board
--- Tentative Parcel Map --- Redevelopment Agency
--- Site Plan & Arch. Review---
Other
b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review
Coordinator).
Location Map Arch. Elevations
--- Gradi ng Pl an --- Landscape Pl ans
...}L Site Pl an --- Photos of Site &
Parcel Map --- Setti ng
--- Precise Plan Tentative Subd. Map
--- Specific Plan -:- Improvement Plans
--- Other Agency Permit or --- Soils Report
--- Approvals Required ---
Eng. Geology Report
--- Hydrological Study
--- Biological Study
--- Archaeological Survey
--- Noise Assessment
--- Traffic Impact Report
Other
/ 7 -J <;
/ . ./
- ;> -
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
3.
~\~
1.
Land Area: sq. footage ~I ~CJl)
)
If land area to be dedicated, state
or acreage ~
acreage and purpose.
2.
~\~
Complete this section if project is residential.
a. Type development: Single family
Multi family Townhouse
b. Number of structures and heights
Two family
Condominium
c. Number of Units: 1 bedroom 2 hedrooms
3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms Total units
d. Gross density (DU/total acres)
e. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication)
f. Estimated project population
g. Estimated sale or rental price range
h. Square footage of floor area(s)
i. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures
j. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
k. Percent of site in road and paved surface
Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial.
a. Type(s) of land use
b. Floor area Height of structure(s)
c. Type of construction used in the structure
d. Describe major access points to the structures and the
orientation to adjoining properties and streets
e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided
f. Estimated number of employees per shift , Number of
shi fts Total
g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate
/ 3 ~ J<j
- 3 -
h. Esti~ated range of service area and basis of estimate
i. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings
j. Hours of operation
k. Type of exterior lighting
4.
If project is other than residential, commercial or industrial
complete this section.
a. Type of project IfI'ClA~rt p(,,_~J,c-e1 Pro~ran'l
b. Type of facilities provided t)(;.C,-!i ~ (' j~~~ .r!.)lL.(..,a~ rcns-mS
c. Square feet of enclosed structures ~ 3~o
1
d. Height of structure(s) - maximum .80 I
e. Ultimate occupancy load of project .:rraff
Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided LJ
Square feet of road and paved surfaces 2r/..!loo.:x;. 8 F
f.
g.
"\
.n ~ (,J p,.,. "'
C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
1. If the project could result in the direct emission of any air
pollutants, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) identify them.
f/y~ l ru L.0+
)..,,(...~-y,
"
"
U''L ( IJ)
2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated ~
(If yes, complete the following:)
a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards of
earth will be excavated?
b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed?
c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded?
d. What will be the - Maximum depth of cut
Average depth of cut
Maxi~um depth of fill
Average depth of fill
/ 3 - 3,C:-
- 4 -
3. Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed
project and the type of energy used (air conditioning, electrical
appliance, heating equipment, etc.) (6?;d lU{U""U':~ - ,i~vh'i~ -= a II
tJ..jJ...;~ dnirAJ 8../l. 'Yi~rg'
4. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project
(sq. ft. or acres) 1760 2"1. -L-f.
/' u
5. If the project will result in any employment opportunities describe
the nature and type of these jobs. 10 f"'.srh(!o/ -ft'MIu"-g p<':>i-l;c,.,~f
1 ~l.cf"A'VI\~'r ICt~~./:..5U.N"ul~lJrJ J ~t"\",:;j ~;:",;,-, I.....'-.::;:t"~ (/o.j/-h_
' I
6. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or
substances be used or stored within the project
site? no
7. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by
the project? """""'-ff r N. .;r;t)
8. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the
project, and their points of access or connection to the project
site. Improvements include but not limited to the following: new
streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer
lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
f<l1 It
D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
1. Geology.
Has a geology study heen conducted on the property? f)1l-C- :';(/1 re-
(If yes, please attach)
Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? n~sun/ _ .';~<:-
(If yes, please attach) o.-ftAt-- wcVV-u'
2. Hydrology
Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the
site? '1"'~ (If yes, please explain in detail.)
a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water
table? (1 f'l
b.
Ar~ there any wat~rc~urses 0: drainage improve~ts ~n or
adjacent to the slte. C;~ In<,~~,"<l ""un n"~%
U 11{,. .
o f pror~
) J~3&
- 5 -
c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly into or toward
a domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay?
nO
d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to
adjacent areas? nO
e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their
location. NIIt
3. Noise
a. Will there be any noise generated from the proposed project site
or from points of access which may impact the surrounding or
a~ja~L land use.s? ~lfu 0 (l~Id.--e'1 ria,,!; .~s I ",,>, ~i4
"1r (j'C)'.r, r frYY\...J..~ ;- ~\
4. Biology
a. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state?
nn
b. Indicate type, size and quantity of trees on the site and which
(if any) will be removed by the project. /.(/ (Jide :)<( ,,'fI'o' -
. 1- 1 I ,
I1.ti7r' t.<.1 II =- r<f/!1.C"l.'T"c-J.
5. Past Use of the Land
a. Are there any known historical resources located on or near the
project site? nO
b. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on
or near the project si te? "rJ
6. Current Land Use
a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the
project site. lleu<"-.,, \ hu..;\,l.;"l) l c..tay,\~b,L. \A "'3 \ 54nc-\uCLYi I
~I~jt; ~t~(l'("~~l~~:7'(,~~\,,~U~,~/v,(.(1Vj 1,+ 0 ,,11 r"wI~
/ \.~s oj
./ ./ /
- 6 -
b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on
adjacent property.
North ApIl..-trr...d:.'S, {P:5ir--fj\~ ~/\.M."'\ (f~iAt.hrP<",1 j'~.--<<~,cAJ
South -r..LJ( ";..~5/, ~.......; 1,\ r<~;.L.~r... s . {we Sr........".".)
EastJ.j ~INjI.( frttn.,\" Ceo.; k"" w
I
West ""iI..C" ")-\7){\J, Af,.~-trv\l'~ tr\N.-< ~r....~4A...AJ
7. Social
a.
Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?)
no
b. Are there any current e~ploy~ent opportunities on site? (If so,
hOlI many and what type?) ~
Please provide any other information which could expedite the evaluation of
the proposed proJect.
/3"'3'5
- 7 -
E. CERTIFICATION
I, ~'J' &~"~7
or
ClImer /owner i n escrO\~*
I, dlv<-7/f7-f? r Dd
" , '--'"
O((/~( (i(- YclA0h 6CflliU4-> or
Consultant or Agent* . ~
Er) JJCC'rJC,-f C.8f"/J1{J~Y y( (/ic.-u:v
HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and information
herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known
information concerning the project and its setting have been included in
Parts B, C and D of this application for an Initial Study of possible
environmental impact and any enclosures for attachments thereto.
DATE: ?//;;Jo/q/
II / .
*If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name.
I /'/ <;' ('11
/ j j I
.':.
.l (...
.. (1./)
. '.'
DEPARTMENTAL POLICY
I
I
SOILS INVESTIGATIO~ REPC" R~QUIREO
\ .
Chula Vista City Ccce Section 15.04.050 reauires a soils investio~tion repor: be provided for
all new constructitn projects and for additions with a valuation"exceeding 50~ of th~ valuation
of the existing str~cture.
W~IVER
Waiver of this requirement is at the discretion of the Director of Building and Housing
Oepa rtment.
PROCEDURE
Upon rec!ipt of a wr~tten request containing valid reas~ns therefor, the Director will
determine if a waiver of soils investigation report can be granted.
APPLlCATION
I all'Ar.G 1Y.l>nSr T'E/l'\PL.~ being the owner Dr the duly luthorized repre.-
sentativeDfthe owner oTthe property located at 3'1<- S"nl. A~
Chula Vista, California, hereby request the requirements of the ChUla Vlsta City Code relatlvE
to soils reports be waived for the following reasons:
tI.I~ t.VF-#~ IN~"'II!.D By _'CANG, ,""~ !>UlWVNJIV&
PE('AR...",~N'r ~ ~()/'H ,. RE.t'illh uJft.<;: tlNNS-"'Y S>Vl!!! TO
PtAc.I!."",NT" OF- (ll'WM'l? veT! nN.
,
We agree to abide by any additional requir~ents the City may impose as a condition of
~ranting this request, or alternately, I will exercise my option to retain a California
Registered Civil Engineer in the private sector to submit an alternative design, prior to
placing ~ Iny IfnCW~for review M Ipprov.!.
Signed~.IJ. lit _ Olte ~l/9/BC.
Address 3 <f r
() WAIVER ~EQUEST DENIED
Your request for waiver of an expansive soils report cannot be granted for this project.
Investi~ation of the site and City records indicate problem soils conditions in the im-
mediate area. A soils report and recomm~ndation by a California Registered Civil Engineer
will be required.
(~IVER REQUEST GRANTED
Request for waiver of expansive soils report is granted. The applicable des;gn conta;ned
herein must be incorporated into the pl~ns for the proposed project. Th;s department
reserves the rioht to impose additional conditions or to require a soils report if the
foundation inspp.ction by the building insDector discloses conditions which, in his pro.
fessional ooinion, warrant such action. The City of thula Vista accepts no iiability as
a result of grantinQ this waiver.
1. All footings shall be a minimum of "24- 111"'c. /e..s. below undisturbed natural
qrade, unless ~eeper footings are requlred to satisfy structural require~nts.
2. A minimum of 4- . , +-- grad~ 40 steel rebars shall be
installed. All footings to be contlnuous. Place bars as ~hown on attached details.
3. The following shall be installed IS shown on the Ittach.d details:
Req.
Not Req.
~
~
c..----
Vapor Slll'rier
~.. h.ver, course sand, rock, gravel
6 . 6 . 10 x 10 W.W. mesh It mid slab
\
T-
(3~ 1(C/
C
a
. ~
~
",or.
1c
it"
~
'fKl
{ill.
~.':
illJ
.$\~
~~
~ .
- ~
':0_
'"
!~
. .,. S-
~.
"'
;;"j~,07 ~..
..;>>>>cOX-, , ' .,.-' uo$, ,., .
/ . fI-jJ~
L. .__~-,J.-('"' h:'.. ...-
1:=..,~~..~.". t"'lIII"
~ I '/ .. ~.
.1 ~I .
! - - -
I,
i \
i?
,
!
fiJl
-.'
~
i~
;f
~~
c.
,n
..
"
\ .
It
.. ,
". -
I
- ,
.'
I"
.~
- "'
.....
a"'
U '"
.i'~
~~
~'i;
ill;
~~
.Ii.
s.l
551
) "7 A/!
, ~/
'"Z !..l"T~ C\.Ant.ptll.( to
1
t'
~
I
~
~
.,.
,.
~
"
~
~
_~ ..........,J)-.
~ ..@f
~
"IJ.fI""fir,
iLl"tc:C
!
~ {
~ ~
1:,t
gS ...
- c: '"
;~ <a
o
"-,J~
lI:"",.~.
i
,....~
'wt'''"l'fIliI,,1:
I .
i
I
I ;:",:. Z'~"~T' ~ ~
'....,__ twltt;""'''IL~
.
, I
1..."T'......\~...tlT .JIoj,.!
lJ
n\
I I
I
, -
i 1/
\ Si::T::~ation:
1 345 5th Avenue
Chula Vista,CA
s-
or
~
~
5"
'"
;:,
.'
a.e.nWlCi~""""^"
, 5....
__ --a.._.
1\"'01: .
-<-. -'~--~~
,.: ...~ ............. ~
LEAAi.. .Ot~IPTloJ
~
I ~
;'1
7
APN: 568-182-06
Property Owner:
Grace Baptist Temple,Inc
"LL.. D' -n<f. ....-e~Il.l,..~ ~ aJ,r"11 Of- Q>J~ '-5i'cn...J14., Of
Clot'^-" 'lII~T". IIJ nit. ClT"f. OF ,tU." Vlq.., ~~, TQ t'1"P
'nIf\l.lP.iJl> 'S~ I"Lf;tnlo.l 'nIf. DI'flCf. Of- 'Oll- puDl'.QE'" 'DF ~
!>,t.*IO '.~; EJ<UP'f''"'I 'lllfWll.Aol -n<( UDRfl"u:t.'r..... ntT, .,
'1'HU!.C~1 A.~" t)O:.~" 'nIl2EfRDM' 1)<E f.~'ltI!\..'l'''Z6'>Feq 1\llltEDl' J
.1lL"'" t/<.<UT1"l9 lflf.-IUiWt-'\ TliE '~HfltLT r,O ~r oFlwE:- '
\o.III..,.,....T 1'>0 f.I-T ., . .
.
It<w.o,_
I'lQlllc::Ja't ltWzJ %""17 t ;J?l:!jQ J:~Ic7jS-Z :..;:: srv "rAm ~NKl1in\l
:;JRL is LL:fv'lI 3J'v''zI?
I
.
~
'~/Ir'
i
4'
~C'l
~ D
I
a
!J\~
~ g
o D
..
,
Ii
f
\1~~i~~~~ ~. .
~f':;;' .-, fI '"
1: ( if
"
If - \(
If r
it 1
f
~
J\
,. .
:t=:"_
"i..:
. ~~~:
r
il
,I
.
~I
]
~
I
I
~
,
f
11
~~
It
H
-:-:.,:.~
----_.~.)
.-.-.".-.".
~!::~
m
[j
~'~
.-
..... ~ .. .
JEj
t.., - 1"-
f
!
t-
a
1 '
~~,~
~
I
~.
~~.
"
"
,
'\
[
f
l~
l
ffij \~
r'}/L( A:;
S '0
· ': ~ , cO I
~ it t\ - 41
I II.. ,
~I
>=:
~
....
~.
~:
Iii
~
~
~
.
. .
IEl
:
CIRCLE
AREA
BLOCKS
[~
llil
CIRCLE
. AREA
~
.~....",,:.-~'
4~'."
Entrance
[ ...::z:..;"';.l
'f'
N
I
"
. ,-~~I~. :ijW
",~,.Ilm '
i~ \ '- SCIENCE . Ill!
";';'i.t\l!ll LIBRAR
,~'''\ t!ll ~
- ,~
,~"
,~ i
!
I
::1
lO~-,"""~J
1~'
1 J4 ~ I
'f
~I
-~ G;-Gls
~.' ~: . . -1"01
..,~,) "'~
...~.o:.'-'/J -
~E'EI~
M~B~~EVE
1';'1' ,.~~,:.:~.;":..[iln'
t'.( <:~::~,~c:."":.L!L:;.t
G:',,,,-E€
~~
K'"i.~
~.,
,.... ..J,
.,"
ART
UPSTAIRS CLASSROOM
/3.L/3
1.
j
CIRCLE
AREA
. ,
I~l;:- n t?
b""+~' ~}.lD!
.~~..~
MANIPULATIVE ~.
f.,~,:~:-~~-I.::'~ :,;':,i
~
J~
"
,..
DRAMATI.C. ~
PLAY ~. ~I
~ ~j
rn . -
[;] .j(P
P4 r~~
~ ~\!fj
"
~
~
"'..
"'",
u..
e;..
u
r;v:10
~t!tJ
g
GOIDD
of ,..' ~""l@
c:l m GJE]
"'Sc:l8J
" " 171
O .::;, , L:.J
., . ;.~..
" -.
DGElQ
!-,.....,:;!,I
:" -
1~1
(/':)
v
'"
u
15
...
U
III
t
I:
^
v
,.
~
..
"'
...
...
'"
u
~
I-
Z
'"
III
"
g
...
"'
I. -: ~. ~
... .....
D~
~O
Pol ':
U .
... .
I-
~D
Q
::>:
o
o
i:>::
Ul
Ul
<
...:I
U
...:I
~
>
~
...:I.
o
Z
~
o
i:>::
l?
/:; /LJif
~
1
~~
~~ ~
~~'-'
% ~
v ~~
~ _.0.
~~
.3 ;;.
~
#ur~~,V
CL!Is.s 1<0 ON\
5'
CII"~cH
c.1t:<"uro(lM..$
J( (\
-
. .. ~l"
~}
O.
~ \)~
-:. ()~
,~ ~ ~
r-"C~,..
s~ ~
~~ ~~~
-~ ~
9:.s t~~~
~ ",'0
"{
.
\.
...
-<
G.
;:;-
('\
t X"I.$-f,'".5 CL
..5RIle.-ftAA r y
Playground
Outside Area -
,/
.1 /. . LIL.;
/ --~' ,.'
Episcopal Community Services.
South Bay Head Start
Park Way Center
September 1991
South Bay Head Start currently operates siw centers in the South
Bay, two in National City, two in Chula Vista, one in Imperial
Beach, and one in San Ysidro. Head Start is a federally funded
program that offers comprehensive medical, dental, nutritional,
mental health, social, and educational services to low-income
families with three to five year old children. Children with
disabilities are mainstreamed into our program.
South Bay Head Start proposes to open another center in the South
Bay. The program proposes to lease space from the Grace Baptist
Temple of Chula Vista, located at 345 5th Avenue. The center
will have the capacity to serve 124 children, 62 in the morning
session from 8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., and 62 in the afternoon
session from 12:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. There will be a total of
four classes. Three classes will have 15 children with one
teacher, one teacher-aide, and one parent volunteer in each
session (One adult per 5 children). One class will have 17
children with one teacher, one teacher-aide, and one parent
volunteer (one adult per 6 children). Preschool classes are held
Monday through Thursday. Trainings, workshops, and meetings for
both staff and parents are held on Fridays. The center will be
open from September through June every year.
For the preschool classrooms Head Start will lease the Temples
e.isting upstairs classroom and e.isting ground level nursery
rooms. The program will also lease space for an office. A
playground structure will need to be installed along with the
required safety cushion underneath the structure. Head Start
proposes to install the structure in the grass area between the
nursery rooms and the Temples sanctuary. A portable fence will
be used to secure a section of the parking lot for the children's
tricycle area during our hours of operation.
The Head Start program will have sole use of the leased
facilities during our hours of operation. The Temple currently
does not have any functions that would conflict with the Head
Start schedule. The Temple has agreed not to schedule any
functions during the Head Start program's hours of operation.
)J~~h
South Bay Head Start
Park Way Center
1991
SAMPLE DAILY SCHEDULE
7:30-B:OO........Staff arrive, prepare for children
B:OO-B:15........Children arrive
B:15-B:45........Breakfast
B:45-9:00........Tooth-brushing and bathroom
9:00-9:20........Small group time
9:20-10:05.......Indoor free choice activities
10:05-10:50......0utdoor free choice activities
10:50-11:00......Clean-up and bathrooms
11:00-11:30......Lunch and dismissal
11:30-12:30......Teacher break
12:30-12:45......Children arrive
12:45-1:15.......Lunch
1:15-1:30........Tooth-brushing and bathrooms
1:30-1:50........Small group time
1:50-2:40........Indoor free choice activities
2:40-3:30........0utdoor free choice activities
3:30-3:40........Clean-up and bathrooms
3:40-4:00........Snack and dismissal
4:00-4-30........Staff clean-up and dismissal.
;-(
,,/"
(''I
l /
. ,
.
\
Case No. \S-C1;;l-IO
CITY DATA
F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. Current Zonina on site:
North
South
East
West
R-~
;1..-'2,
1'2--"2..
i:.-7,
2. ~ ':)
2.
Does the project conform to ,the, current zoning? ~i t In S~ ~ ~ -
rlr nln. n r_e~ m (" f")d'1rllt- \ t."'"lJ\ ~ ~ p. r -- I~
General Plan land use
designation on site:
North
South
East
West
I..bP G!l7"' c~ 1= 0. SF'
\" h~'('.I'.:to1 ~ C /1:, r-~
'~~7:~~~~ n~
e . nC,1 t-fj
-rhcr-,-"")!,( ~h r=n rp
re=.l rtt>n+ll r" 1
Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram? ~~p s .
Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent
to an area so designated? NO.
Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? N~.
(If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance
the scenic quality of the route.) N I~
~
3. Schools
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following:
Students
Permanent Temporary Current Generated
Attendance Canacftv Caoacftv From Proiect
Schoo1-
Elementary
Jr. High
Sr. High
4. Remarks: NIl>., I-.J':lt" no r~c.,;r:lF.nh'",1 pr~y'r~
Director of Planning or Representative
Date
J] - L/,/
WPC 9459P
-13-
,
-_." ~ ---
Y'f>- 5"0 I
!
G. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Case No. I'5~-1 0
1. Drainaae
I. Is the project site within 1 flood plain? .kLD.
If so, state which FEMA Floodway Frequency Boundary fJ fA .
.
b. What is the location and description of existing on-site
drainage facl1ities? 10',( If.s' '12;-_6 UfoJPE.I:l 'PJIo.C.1L.I1-l' LL>r. ~~T'Et> INI..Fr
A..,- IJO#Z.Tl+ ~1'D~ r.;:tf/::; 'PAl2J,(lt.l.c t..D"'r 1'Y-11.r~ MD~T" tt:...tJ~...~,E" 'R...nlAl .'.t.,n:>
COVEYO:; '7l'T'HE. 1i!?8 VI", AIoJ 18.C6P. 'R~AIIoJ~I2.&JF Fu:WS~ n>STH.
c. Are they adequate to serve the project? YE;:;.. AVE.
If not, explain briefly. /oJ/A
.
d. What is the location and description of existing off-site
drainage facilities? 1/)',,4.o;'FZL.p, ar~..~ tJtJ~1l.. FIFTH AV"'o.lUE:.
'.
e. Are they adequate to serve the project? YE6 .
If not, explain briefly. f.J./A
.
2. TranSDortatfon
a. What roads provide primary access to the project? -PtFT1-l AiI~LllJE.
b. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be
generated by the project (per day)? :z.32 ("TUNE /lH!r,Vt!oH-=Pn:"lA~fI!..
tl/..H-Y)
c. What is the ADT and estimated level of service before and after
project completion?
Before After
A.D. T. hlfl>n Co4t7...
L.O.S.
A
A
If the A.D. T. or L.O.S. is unknown or not applicable, explain
bri efl,V. .
d. Are the p'rimary access roads adequate to serve the project? If
not, explain briefly. y~<::,..
WPC 9459P
-14-
/3 - Y1
Ys-5t:>/
ClSe No. rs...qZ-IO
e. Are there any intersections at or near the point that will
result in an unacceptable level of Service (lOS)?J..lo.
If so, identify: location
Cumulative l.O.S.
Is there any dedication required? .t:lo.
If so, please specify.
f.
g.
Is there any street widening required? /oJD.
If so, please specify.
h. Are there any other street improvements required? ~f)
If so, please specify the general nature of the necessary
improvements.
3. Soils N/A (~IT"E IS FvU.'( 'PEVE'-OPE";:>)
" Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the
a.
project site?
b. If yes, specify these conditions.
c. Is a soils report necessJry?
4. land Form N~ (Srn:: 1<7 /=Vu.'( 1:>~v'e:l..CPEb)
a. What is the average natural slope of the site?
b. What is the maximum natural slope of the site?
5. Noise
Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that
are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required
of the applicant? IJ 0 .
6. Waste Generation
How much solid and liquid (sewage) waste' will be generated by the
proposed project per day? . .
G:J\J~ 7lI/fDf)' . . 'J/flIE. n+-eoc.J6tt \
Solid "<D L~/'MY 5G~~ iauid 730 IU.I Lorl",/~y ~MSE-P-. ./
. ../ I
What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or
downstream from the site? 12 'I V.C.P. IN ':/~T~ AVrEUtJEE.
Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? .~~.
r3-50
WPC 9459P
-15-
YS-5?) (
Case No. 15Jf2-(D
7. Remarks
Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impacts,
mitigation measures. or other issues.
.i1+E: H~ ~ 1'tC:E~"fJl... WIL..L. nA::J?A:Ire AZoAA LTVNE ~L>Qt
~=~ =~~AV;; ~ ~~~ru::, ~k: /J.f) IMAAc-r
If) //1/ ~
Date
WPC 9459P
-16-
. -,
/
/
s/
. ,
12/11/91 11: 15
12/11/91 Fifth & L
12/20/91
WPC 0069p
ACOUSTICAL STUDY
IS-92-10, 345 FIFTH AVENUE
ANALYZED BY BILL MORTON, CITY COMMUNICATIONS
345 Fifth Avenue ambient noise levels (no children
out) from SW along front of bu il ding sw to nw avenue
50 db - 60 db (cars & planes) Median avenue 54-56 db
Ambient noise level (no children out) from northeast
along front to sw side avenue runs (traffic from 75
db to 90 db) avenue no traffic 58 db to 65 db)
0840 - 0900 - Recess
Normal avenue - kids playing 70 db to 78 db avenue
peaks of 85 db - kids yelling
0910 - Recess
Normal avenue - kids playing 68 db to 81 db avo
peaks of 86 db kids screaming
/)/5J-
.
I.
Case No. 1'3 -q;;H 0
H. FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. What is the distance to the nearest fire station? !n.d what is the
Fire Department's estimated reaction time? ~ mile.
Two minute!=;
2. Will the Fire Department be able to provide an adequate level of fire
protection for the proposed facility without an increase in equipment
or personnel? Yes.
'3. Remarks
e. 1Y,~~
Fire Marshal
10/16/91
Date
/ < /L"
'/' /~)
WPC 9459P
-17-
CHULA VISTA FIRE DEPARTMENT
BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
PLAN CORRECTION SHEET
Address 345 Fifth Avenue
Pl an Filer~o'l.2-l0
Checker Horsfall Date 10/16/91
Type Constr.
Occupancy E-3
No. Stories 2
Bldg. Area
The following list does not necessarily include all errors and omissions.
ftWW:t)fdlIDx~KlibcQtlX~ COMMENTS:
1. State fire codes classify the proposed head start development program as a Group
E, Division 3, Occupancy. "Child care centers, Infant centers, pre-school, school age
programs, adult day care.
Title 24, Section 802 (cl does not allow day care above or below the first story.
An exception allows day care on the second floor if the building is protected by
an automatic sprinkler system and there are at least two exits directly to the
exterior. The proposed upstairs classroom does not meet these requirements.
2. ~bat type of cooking will be done? Is there a fire suppression system to
protect the cooking surfaces?
3. Monthly fire drills are required.
4. An emergency pre-fire plan shall be posted and should include: Evacuation routes
to a public way, Instructions to be followed by teacher(teacher shall remove roll book
from classroom to call roll and shall maintain order during evacuation).
5. A safe dispersal area is required to be located not less than 50 feet from
buildings. Dispersal areas shall be sized to provide an area of not less than
3 square feet per occupant.
6. A fire alarm system and fire extinguishers are existing.
FPB-29
/3//"'-/
Case No. ]5-Cj:;:{-ID
H-I. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1. How many acres ~f parkl and are necessary to serve the proposed
project? ~.~ .
2. How Ilany acres of developed parkland are within the Park Service
District of this project as shown in the P.rks and Recreation Element
of the General Plan? (If applicable) t+.~ .
3. What are the current park acreage ,re!luirements in the Park Service
District? (If applicable) H.-fi.
4. Is project subject to Par~ & Recreatl.on Threshold re!luirements? Nu.
If not, please explain. ~. ~&i.-)<':' ~LiN.
5. Are existing neighborhood and community parks near the project
adequate to serve the population increase resulting from this project?
~ H.t?.
Neighborhood
Community Parks
,.J~.
6. If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed as part
of the project adequate to serve the population increase?
Neighborhood N .b.
Community Parks \l.A
7. Does this project exceed the Parks and Recreation Thresholds
established by City Council policies?
~O.
8. To meet City requirements, will applicant be required to:
Provide land? ND
Pay a fee? ,dO
9. Remarks:
-~~~
Parks and Recreation Director or Representative
!c.Il.9/
Date
/ -:'
/ '/~-
~/",
L; ~/
WPC 9459P
-18-
ClSe No. JS-q'J.-IO
IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
I. Indicate which of the following issues have been identified IS having
potentially significant environmental effects and should be addressed in
an EIR. This list is not intended to be all-inclusive.
Aesthetic/Visual
Agricultural Land
Air Quality
Archaeological/Historical
Zoning/General Plan
Drainage/Absorption
Economi cfJobs
Fiscal
Flood Plain/Flooding
Forest Land/Fire Hazard
Geologic/Seismic
Minerals
Noise
Population/Housing Balance
Public Services/Facilities
Recreation/Parks
Schools/Universities
Septic Systems
Sewer Capacity
Soil/Erosion/Compaction/Grading
Sol id Waste
Toxic/Hazardous
Traffic/Circulation
Vegetation
Water Quality
Water Supply/Groundwater
Wetland/Riparian
Wildlife
Growth Inducing
Land Use
Cumulative Effects
Other
11. Summarize each issue briefly.
) )/ ~ft
WPC 9459P
-19-
I.
...... J
_III
IM'.__.... CIIRIlIS'f ,.
(T. .. '-I.,... I, L.... Agooc"
1. _., ~ ..-_rut ~i:ll..\...\: I~ ~_\I ~\r~I:.,,\ S~.(1_( +
r. ........ .. .... ...... ., "I,lnlftt "i,4 ~-, C 1 [ '4, '", 1'-..\ Ll"
Ct\ IA'''''' VI'" I.,",. (" 1>.. ~\ 0\ II)
Y 2.. 7_ -~ I \w ( 17-
I. . Dot. of tIlocklllt I I I 'Z.. 5 I q ,
4. __ If PrIIpo..1 S. ~ u... ( \. \...J 1 {j ..t..~ \.'" I, l I (" 1-
I. lom.l 5''''' _ '" 7' - \ '-j
/
II. bot_I '-b
([""I_t_ of .11 .,... .. ~. ___ an .....Irod .. .u......
.....,..,
I. r.tII. 1111 tIIo _1 NIllt to:
.. ...i..l. _ ....ltI... ... .....
I. ...1.,1. _,....,....,
..
.~
\,-J
\ ..
\r\
,,] ..
IlPt "SIP
DII""'I_. ".,I..-t..
CllllpKtt... .. '-..,l,. _..&.rt.. of tM
lOin
~ 10 t.'.I'.....7 ... ...-
.m... nllof f..,..."
,.. ..tl'llCtl... _.. ...
_lft..U.. .f .., _I... ...1.,1.
or NtI..1 f..t....'
.N.
m lImt III
__L
- ~
- - ~
__.!S.
III'C "5"
.. ..., locno.. I. "'.. ... lOtIO' _I..
.f ..n.. ..tIIer .. ... ef, the IU.t
f.
~. 10 .,..ltt.. ... _t.. of
belch 1IRdl, or change. ,. .Iltatt..,
wpotlUon or .nlst.. "'ch ..,
~tfy tM c......l If . r'ur or
stre_ or the Md of the ecelll ... III'
bat. 1.1.t .. l.toT
,.
b,..... .f _I. ... ~, to
r.OID9tc bzlNS ad I' l.rt..UI,
anels"_" .....11...., .......
f'lhln_ ... I,_n... hUlnt.'
.. ~. to .....'U.. ntH. ....t_
..tt...... ... tN rate .... _t If
.m... .-of"
.. Altaratl... to tIIo ___ ... n. of
fl.... WltorlT
.21.
_ l.
- -..I:.
- - ~
_ _ A.
'-
'w
\
~
llPC_
4.
..
.
~ I.._af___...
I. .., ...tor ....If
..
11-.,0 I. __ ......... ... ..,
alt....U_ If ..,fecl water ...1ft"
11It1""t.. loot oot 1I.,ted t.
t.....r.t..... 4"..1'" ..,.,... .r
tlIrbtdltlf
f.
.,_,. af . "Netl. ... rate
.f n... .f ..- ...t....l
,.
~ I. . -"11 af ...-
...t..... .,_ t....... dIrect
addttl_ ... ",t_h. ... t........
t"tercepU.. ., .. ...If... .., allI .r
Dunt ,..,!
..
SaIltteatl.l .....cU. I. t.. _
.f ...t... et......t.. ...n...,. f...
""lc ..t... ..,,1,..1
I.
r.,n.. af _,. ... -" t.
..tor ..lItod ........ .... u
n....,.. ... tl4Il .....1
PI. LIla. 1111 tile _, ....It I.:
.. ~ ,. tile ......It, af .,.."...
or _ .f .., .,..,t.. af pI Int.
('RC11d'.. t,.." Ihrwbl, ,,'SI,
crop,. Md _tic ,1..t.'l
..
....'ctl. af . -.... af ..,
.'qIII. nn .. ~I .1 ~ ~ .,eet.. If
,llItsl
c.
.Iltndooctl. af _ .,..".. af ,1._
'.to aft .,..It .. t. . ..rr.... t. tlte
_1 ..,I..,~ If Illlotl..
.,..,1..1
-12-
__L
--~
__25.
--~
--~
__is
--~
--~
__1:.
1IPt "SIP
do
~I.. I. ...... af ..,
...Inlt..., cropl
I.
..,.1 lIl\t. WIlt tile _, ....,t I.,
.0 ~ I. tile dl....,t' af _,...
er .....,.. If .., ..t.. ., .'.11
(blrd.. I'" ..I..h 11It1""t..
reptll... fls. ... ...ltft.... "'!blc
..,.101... ... IlIIet." .
..
_tl. .f t.. -.... af ..,
.'''' ran -w _.n,..'" """ .,
..,..hl
c.
'et_,. '.f _ .,..".. If
''''..11 t.to .. .....t II' ",.It t. .
..rrl... to t" .t....tI.. ... _
.f ",'.11'
do
1IIt..,ontl.. t. ..htl.. f1.. ...
.lldllf. ...ttetl
'0
",... WI11 t.. _, ....,t ,.,
.0 .1It...... ,. Illhtl.. .'11 1...111
.. bpi.... af _,. te ...... .,..
I...hl
7.
lItM ... 11.... WI11 . _,
"".... _ ""'t ... ,II..,
'0
lead... lilt . _, ....It ,. .
....to.tI.1 .Itentl.. of . proooot ...
'1..... I'" ... If .. ...d
-n-
--~
--~
- - lL
__2!.
__is.
--t
--~
--~
__i
.. .Itontl_ ...~. nfl ..
t. -, .--- 1111 tile -.., air trlfflc? ,
N..1& 'al .....
.. 1__ tto ... n.. .,....,.., f. I........ I. tn"Ie ..._ .. _
..t....1 NUWCH' Ii wahlc'... .Ic1<'I.t. .. fOdo.trl...I A
- -
10. .IIl ., r,oet. 1m tile .....' 1_'.., ... ....lIc Sorwl_. 11111 tile _..I _
1ft .ffHt tIpOft, .. res.1t t. . ...... ,... ....
.. A ,tI' ., _ ..,lMf.. .. De ,.l.ls. or ,'t,red 9O~tll ..,.IclI t. ..,. .f
., ......... .oIl.tllCl. (toeh'dtng, 1M fol1aw'ng lrell:
IMIt ROt U.fttd t. oil, ,.,Uef..,
c....tcols or rldt.U.., I. till ....t I. Ftn ".toctl.., :i-
.f II _1_ or ",..t COIIdIt t...I K
- -
wit' .. """ ........ I.., "
.. ,...1... ,--- ..
_, ......... ,I.. or III
__, "K"U.. ,h..I ~ c. SdloIIs' A
- -
II. ,.,.,..1... 11111 ... ....., .'ter ... 4. ..... .. ..... ~I_I
'OCllt.., 'htrtMttOft, ....sUJ. ... .....,u. fKII m.., :A
,at. Of tM ___ ,.,.1att_ .f . <....., ~ - -
- - fKflltl...
.. 1II1.t_ .f ....lIe
If. _'''' 11111 ... ,..,..., ,"oct loe""'lng nId" ~
..hU... "'st... II" en.to . ....... for
oddltl..., _lot? :J.. I to, ....1_'
- - f. 0tW ".&\ ~
13. "__tlt'~'_'''I... 11111 ...
_.., n..lt I., IS. ,-. 1m tile ....., nso,t I.,
"- oddltl_' u.. ., _tootll' _ ., he,
\.,-1 .. -..,.. ., _II' .. ..
wahlCll'er _, ~ -ruf .1
- -
\
'\ .. ["oct. .. ..l.tl.. ....'.. ... M.t...I., ,oe..... I. "-4 _
fKllltl... .. ""'""" for _ ....lng' !.. ..tstt.. ......,.. .. -rv. ..
~ - - .....1.. till _,_t .f -
_tootl., tto.-ct _ ....tl.. SGI1'CI'" ......" 1
e. - -
trlll.port.tl.. .,....., ;.( ....., _t ...
- - II. .......1.. 1111 t..
.,t_I_ .. -- ...- ., Clt,'. Th","'d/Stlld.rd. "'lcI.., l.
4. - -
elre.l.tt.. .. _ If _I.
_or ......, 1:
- -
IOCM5tI'
.M-
IIPt "SIP
.n-
.
1lI't "SIP
17.
_ "'D. 1111 ... _1 ....It
'11:
..
CNot,., ., .,
,....tI., ho.'t~
...t., ho.'th)'
""D ........ ..
........ C..clod'..
.. ~., _'a ta ,....tI.,
ho.," .........,
".
-,... "" ... ......., ....,t 'a
t... .tnctt. ., MI, lenle ,tate ar ....
_ t. tIla ..II.. .. .m tIla ..........1
ns.1t t. lM cre.tlOII .f .. Hst_UcaHI
.ff...,.. .It. _ t. ....11. .,..,
It.
-.,.,. 1111 ... _, ....It 'a
1ft ,_t _ tho ....lIt, or ....ntlt' of
..1It1.. ......tI..., -'_'till'
It.
blt...1 1Ih..- _.
.N.
...L
__A
A
A
1lI't "SIP
II.
-.., '-OIl ., 1.....-.
.. _..........t.... tIla ...-,.,
to ...... ~ tIla ....1111 or - tIla
_'_t _te.tI.", __ tho
hoblt.t .# . 'lIh .. .nd1 If.
,pecll', one 1ft.. ... wl1dU'.
_l.U., to ..., ho'.. so"
..,ta'.'" 1...,., ~re.~ t.
.,..,,,.t. . ,l..t er ..,..,
c_It,. -. tIla _ ..
"strict ~ r.... ., . rare er
........"'" "..t .. .,.., ..
., ......t. tlllllOrtnt .....,.. It U.
oaJor ,..'od. .f Calif....,. "1taI7
or ....IIIor1'
.. _ tIla ........ .... ... ,..oat'.,
t. Kh'en .1IIt't.t.... te tile
dll......t... .. ,...._.
-,-.., ...11' C. '''rt-to..
,_t _ tho _'_t It _
.....e.. ecCWI t. . ...l.U..., ..'.f,
dlftalth. ""od .f tI.. whn.
l....t... 'lIP..t. lit" ....... ..11
'ato tllo ,tit....)
_ tho ,..Jact .... '....... ..,..
... ,""'.'....11' 1I.1t"". hot
c_lotl.." c..'.....bl.' CA
,...I.d .., '_t t.. ... -.
1.,lrata nswrcl. .,.. tile '_act
III ...h ......... II ..,.tI.." _11,
hot ..... tllo .ffact .f tIla tot. 1 If
t.... I_to . tIla _'_t ,.
I,..mcnt.)
- ... ,..Jact .... ""_,
.ffactl wh'ch "'11 CHH .....t..t..,
_so .lfactl . _ ho',,",
"tIler d,...tI, .. 'od,...tl11
.D.
. .
- - ~
--~
--,l(
--'f..
III. Deteraination
(To be completed by the Lead Agency.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.......[)( )
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a signif.icant effect in
this case because the lIitigation lIl!asures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WILL BE PREPARED...................................................[ ]
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required........[ ]
Signature
Date
For
IV. SUMMARY OF ISSUES
List all significant or potentially significant impacts identified in
the Initial Study checklist form.
YES
MAYBE
X
\--+ l,). \"""\" - J-" ~ e...~. \+41""\
J] t I
v~c 9~59P
-28-
M. DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION
(Chapter 1706. Statutes of 1990 - AS 3158)
-:t- It is hereby found that this project involVes no potential for
any adverse effect. either individually or cumulatively on
wildlife resources and that a .Certificate of Fee Exemption"
shall be prepared for this project.
_ It is hereby found that this project could potentially impact
wildlife. individually or cumulatively and therefore fees in
accordance with Section 711.4 (d) of the Fish and Same Code
shall be paid to the County Clerk.
Environmental Review Coordinator
.
Date
,
/ ]-&J
"Dr DAI:DD
-,Q-
Sweetwater Union High Schaal District
ADMINISTRATION CENTER
1130 Fifth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91911-2896
(619) 691-5500
October 21, 1991
Rf2C12JV12D
DC,, .
, 24, 7997
E.LI-INNJNG '
Division of Planning and Facilities
Ms. Barbara Reid
City of Chula Vista
Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Dear Ms.Reid:
He: 18-92-10 - 345 Fifth Avenue, Grace Baptist Temple
Please be advised that the subject project is exempt from developer fees,
However, a Certificate of Compliance will be required of the applicant.
Cordially,
~#~~
Thomas Silva
Assistant Director of Planning
TS/ml
)(,-J.(
/ ft:-/
Barbara Kaiser
358 Hedge Way
Chula Vista, Ca.
RECEIVED
OCT 0. '9
. l ~,.... "0
92010 '- '.J
PLANNING
October 21, 1991
Re: Initial Study: South Bay Head Start
Preschool
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR
P.O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, Ca. 91912
Dear Sir:
This is the first time I have written to a public agency. I
am writing now because there appears to be no other way to
protect our neighborhood or our children.
The proposed Head Start Preschool is no doubt a much needed
service in the community. However, 345 5th Avenue is not the
most desireable location for a program that will increase traffic
to the area and jeopardized the safety of the children now going
to two schools just a block and a half away from the proposed
preschool site. People dropping children off to preschool for
the most part are on their way to work and in a hurry, that fact
puts the children going to school in the morning in jeopardy.
Recently our local City Council in all its' wisdom approved
a condominium project on 5th Avenue just a block from where the
preschool is proposed, They also approved a very large apartment
complex across the street from the proposed preschool. Another
small apartment development was completed last year justa half a
block from the proposed preschool right off the corner of 5th and
Parkway.
Please look carefully at the density of traffic and the fact
that two schools in the area have many children walking to school
right past the driveway of Grace Baptist Temple. Adding more
traffic at the critical morning hour, and traffic that is in a
hurry to go to work, is a recipe for disaster. Some child is
going to get injured in a vehicle versus child accident!
Sincerely,
y/~
Barbara Kaiser
)J-ti
~ "
THE Cll F CHULA VISTA PAR1Y DISCLO~, .E STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all mailers
which will require discretionary action on ~he pljrt of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following informatiolJ mus~ be disclosed: ~
1.
List the names of all persons having a financial
7ii4~;f;~~T~';~~~
interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
.on- ~()f. f-IJ (P-~~U ~t ~,.I.~
.,
.
I
I
.
If any person identified pursuant to (]) above is a corporation or pannership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than ]0% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
'l.A n (..
3. If any person identified 'pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person ~erving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
11111'tL
4, Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boar~ Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes,_
No If yes, please indicate person(s): ,
5. Please identify each and every person, ilJcluding any agents, employees, consultants or independent
CClntructors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
All"nn /l/li':rJ'7 - ~f' rn-{'r{;~
ChL<I'k '(nr..5- Er;/' teel !!
.Jl'JhMH/,a" H-<"f~. __t:t -"1'-
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contribu!ed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election pe::riod'! Yes _ No..x.. If yes, Slnte:: which
Councilmember(s): ."
"
PL'''''n is ~cfjnc~ ~s: 'All)' indil'idllol.fiml. (o'pnrtn,'rs"ip.joiflll't:l/Il1r~. n,ssocimion. social clllb.[rmcrnol o'1:onizmhm, corl'ormioll,
('J"/O/t', InlSl, ,(rCr;",'r. srndicn/~, this alld nll,l' olher "JlI1II)', ci{~' (llld COIIIIII)~ cit)'. IHlmicJjlllJity, di,'ilricl or olher political subdil'lJiull.
(II' nil)' ol"~r group or comhination tlClj~J,~'as n unit,-
(!l:OTE: AlI~ch ~~~i1ion~1 p~gcs as n.ccc"~I)')
':il.:: ~/4/9/
'\.:, '.\IlISCLOSE.TX"1]
/.~ I /
/ \/ C
../ (f7/
Signature:: o' col1tracl~PJllici@}
M~n~ llYlf?r/;/'L..I7'
Prillt or typ.: name of wntractoc:rrpllc;~
(f{\."'V"l'd: 11:,\lJ,'}411
File No.
PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST
CIIT COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DATE
SUBJECT
~}{:( -- (I.?' (')
(1 " ';1 1'1
i 0... ..,I), \~'..(_." ~\i
.~ l-_€
\/ ~ I ~:t" /! ,0 ," ~ ",,(} ~,I'..j. /) "IM.)
',\..~"... t.. I ~' <"CRy ~\ rv.T . ~~ '. ,."
LOCATION
..~\ '1"-"
1 I ^ I (',}... ,
':;- "1-.l" '. .n' ~'''',' - "
,r, In'
VI\C A_.~ <..1/ V
J..........
f, ,,-," ..
.\
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION n BY FAXL:.....; BY HAND_; BY MAIL
PUBLICATION DATE _:5 /,' .~, /:1 '?.,
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERIT OWNERS---1>-"" r i[t::. L .,'J NO. MAILED
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
;\ ll.l'",h 2-
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK
COPIES TO:
Administration (4)
/
Planning V
/
/
1/
Originating Department
Engineering I //
Others
City Clerk's Office (2) 1/'
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
.::~ I:i' 1(( :L
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
-58-
\ ');.> ~LoL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY TIlE CHULA VISTA Cl1Y COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA, CAUFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHUrA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public
hearing to consider the following:
Appeal of the Design Review Committee's decision to
conditionally approve the sign design for the freestanding pole
sign submitted by Firestone Real Estate proposed to be
installed @ 830 Broadway.
PCC-92-17: A request for a conditional use permit to operate
a Head Start Child Development Preschool Program @ 345
Fifth Avenue in R-3 - Zoning District - Episcopal Community
Services, South Bay Head Start.
PCC-92-34: A request for a conditional use permit to allow a
60-bed drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery center @
3 North Second Avenue in R-3 - Zoning District - Victory
Outreach.
Adopting amendments to the Cardroom Ordinance, including
but are not limited to the following: consolidation and
transferability of existing cardroom licenses; games permitted;
hours and days of operation; types of bets and wagers
permitted; charges for game playing; signage requirements;
and, other related rules and regulations. Council will consider
related amendments to the City's Master Fee Schedule.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, June 2, 1992,
at 4:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at
which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED:
May 20, 1992
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
\:1) +/
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING
PCC-92-17: A request for a conditional use permit to allow the
establishment of a Head start Child Development Program for 124
children (62 in the a.m., 62 in the p.m.). The project is to be
located at 345 Fifth Avenue (Grace Baptist Temple) in the R-3
Zoning District. A plot plan and legal description are on file in
the Planning Department. Any petitions to be submitted must be
received by the Planning Department no later than noon of the
hearing date.
An Initial Study, IS-92-10, of possible significant environmental
impacts has been conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
A finding of no significant environmental impact has been
recommended to the Planning commission and is on file, along with
the Initial study, in the Planning Department.
If you wish to challenge the Council's action in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at
the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the Council at or prior to the public
hearing. For further information, call 691-5101.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
June 2, 1992 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to
be heard may appear. A location map is on file with the City of
Chula vista Planning Department.
DATED: May 14, 1992
CASE NO.: PCC-92-17
\ L, /lcS
;."....~><i......,""
'". ,
~. - - - -- -f 'I LT -- --
. ,,...,-,.-~_L.J l
" , .1--.,- ..,.---
. I .
. ., I I I
t t I I I I r---
; ii : qfD !
CENTER
~_~t
tp'
--
4j.f
---
-~
.;f
.
I
------1
,
I
i~:~i, i
:. I I
~
I
--,- -"1
, I
--"1 I
I I
. I . r
I I -1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I j I I I I
I I I ~_~_.L_J
I I I I I I ~ I
~F I I " .1 I I I I
, I , I I I I
~Jft,r
~T1()H
!
S
~
~
'"
.
~
_.. . :, 1
. -..-.. -
I/-,.I
w &T~~T
e.P1~f'.A"", c.oM~4NliY ~W.VIC
~.,..~ I TH VEiJ.
~I
,
LOCATOR
To p~i~ " H'-A~SrAll.T
P~IW-t ... l~ ~~IL.c~
Pu,. 4lf~'I' lit; ..~J.I'
\ ')~ lei
~
\':1,10
......
((~O"( ~:L\ ·
COllI
COO,C\, .
~CCI(
t L O(;C
CO: \'5~ ·
.
\
\
;'
c; . r-~ ()
, CO':;,'k
~OO'::C'. ()
. O",C)
C.'I <.,
'- (J 4...(..11
,l
LAEL 00206 PCC-92-17
:HUECH: Pk~-SCHOOL AT 345 5TH
X XX X X XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX l.X XX
X XX X X XX XX XX XX XX XX AX XX AX XX][X XX
X XXX X XX XX XXXX XX XX XXXX XX XX XX XX
y Vy Y Y YT VT YV YV Y Y VV TV YT YV VV YV YT
.
.
X XXX X XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX lUX AX XX;.
X XX X X XX XX XUX XX AX XUX XX AX xnn
X XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXX XX XX XXXX~
X XX X X XX XX XX XX Xx XX XX XX AX XX AX AX ~
X XXXX XX XX XXXX XX XX XX XX XXXX XX XX~
T VTTTYY VV YVVV YTVY VT VV VYYY XI TV l
.
5670800500
r~NFREDI J',ELISSA
~......._ ...~~__. ~_.__....... ..L....v
L~ JOLLA CA 92037
5670800900
REYES ETHEL
CHULA TA
EST OF
CA 91910
.
5670801600
DEAR~IN HELEN E TR
.J v'" . _
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5671020400
BOYLE JCHN K/BFVEkLEY D
- __ ,_ u_ __.. _ .
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
..
5682613000
iO~ES PAT A/JULIA A
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
..
..
56826 20300
FiISIIGEi NOR~A 0 TR
I
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
56826 30200
TURNER "OODRO. ./DOROTH~ E
4
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
....
..
f"
5682633900
CALVA~O sA~
J - ~! ~~
SAN DIFGO CA 9 2
.,.
t
5682634300
.FONCEEJiADA GEIiARDC T/J;.LSA M
III.. _
CHULA VISTA C~ 91910
j
l
,
I
XX AX AX XX XX xnx lX XX XX XX AX XX lXH
XX AX i.X XX XX ,XAX AX AX AX AX XX X X XX ;.J'
XX XX i.X XX XX X X XX AX XX XX XX AXXX AX X),
XX XX AX XX XX XX l.X XX AX XX XX XX XX i.X Xl
AX XL H XX XX.x XX XX AX XXXX XX XX XX Al
YYYYYYYYYiiXYXXY~YXYXYXYXYXXX~
AX jiUXXX XX UU XXXXXXXX )'xXX lXXl
XX HXXXXXXiXAX XUXXXXX AX UXXXl
XX XXXX XX XX XXXX XX XX XX AX XXXX XXX)
XX AX XX Xx.X XX llX XK AX AX AX AX XX AXX:
XX XXXX XX XX AXlXXX l.X XXAX AX XX AX x:
Xi Xi Xi Xi YX Xi XX xux XXXX XX XX xx X'
5670800600
~OuRIGvEZ uA.IEL R/EvL~LIA L
L.
CHULA VIST. CA 91910
5670801000
GE~Nl ~ARGARET E TR
---
CHULk VISTA CA 91910
5671020100
PARKS ~A.JORIE E T~UST 07-09-
1
-
CHUL~ VISTk CA 91910
5671020500
I VLSON NANCY G
NORTh HOLL,.OOD CA 91601
5602613100
HILL slEELING P/ORA A
_ uIM____
SAL DIEGO CA 92154
5662620400
l'lC ALP IN E it. Il..L I A-j! E J R
.
SAN uIEGC CA 92154
-I_
5662630300
dARD FAMlLY TRUST 11/15/90
~,-
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5682633600
~L
~A 91910
56&2634000
~
~
F /5 AN uR A G
91910
5662634400
ROGEJ.S THE..Ol. -.II/JETTY 1
.
CHvLA VISTA CA 91910
"",'
"""'"
( o.r .:(
ee(,''.'.1
C 01 (J
cOIn
C 01 (:
COt.n I
.~ 01 CC
eel,..: \;00"
';".
\
,
\ ~i.) _ '/I
"~_."~--"~
1
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
..
.
..
.
.
(.,
0
"
,
,
c.;.
(,
(,
<.I
0
.
,.
.
XXXXXXXXXIXIXXXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXl
XXXXXIXXXXXXXIXXXIXXX.XXXXXXXI
X.XXXIXXXX..XXXXXIX.XXX.X.XXXI
XXXXXiXXXXXiXiXIXXXXX.XXX.XiXI
XXXiX.XXXiXXXXXiXiX.XiX.XXXXXl
xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.x.XXXXX)
XXXXXXXIXXXXXIXIXIXXXIXXXIX.Xl
xxx.xxXXXXX!X!X!X.XIXXXXXXX.Xl
x.XXXXX.XIXXXXXIXIXIXIXIXIXXXI
XXXIXIXIXXX.X.X.XIXXXXXXXXXXXI
xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxx.xxxxxxx:
xxxxxxxXXXXXXlxxxxxxxxxXXXXXX1
5670800700
PAZ A. T QUO
_ 1.11
C!iULA VISTA
A/AURORA C
CA 91910
56708011>00
t BAS CA BSAR
-,
CBULA VISTA
J/~ARISBL~
CA 91910
5671020200
{CCuLLOC~ THOhAS B/SF.IRLEX
C!iULA VISTA CA 91910
5671020600
GARCIAS GUADA~UPE B
-
-
CEUIA VISTA CA 91910
., -
5()82620100
Ni.NH ~"LTE..
- -- _...
ChULA VIS1A CA
91910
5682634100
~ARKERT EARL H/VEL~A A
.. -- .....
C!iUIA V1STA CA 91910
5682634500
CASILLAS JOhGE A/TE..ESA F
. . ....
CEULA VISTA CA 91910
XXXXXXIXIXIXXXXXXXIXIXXXIXXXXI
XXXXXXIX.XXX.XIXXXXXII.XXXIXII
IXIXIIIXXX.XXXXXIXXXXXXXXXIXXI
IXXXXXXx.XXXXXXX.XXXIXXXIXXXXI
.XXXXXXX.XXXiXXXXXXxxx.XXXXXIl
XXXx.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXX'
XXXXXXXX.X.XXXXXIXXXXXXXXXXXXl
IXXXXXIX.XXX.XXXIXIXIIXXXIXXXI
XXXXXXXXIXXXIXXXXXXIXXXXXXXX11
XXXXIXXXXXxxxxxxxxxx.XXXXXXX.1
xxxxxx.x.XXXXXXXXXIXXX.X.X.XXl
.XXX..XXIX.X.Xxx.XXX.XXXI1XI.'
~670b008LO
OLIVAS ROEERT/JUDITH A
~LA VI~TA CA 91910
~6700015(JO
~tP*SUS R
CHOLA VI~TA CA 91910
~6710203cO
i. ANKE RICHARD ~~AliYBELLE
. --~
CHULA VI~T CA 91~11
~6 71 0 2 0 7 U 0
~O
bOHTA CA 91902
I-
r
~6,,2b2C200
~ALTA LHAR~ES R/ELoANOh ~
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
~6b26301UO
!lARDING CHARLENE B Tis.
LHULA VI~TA CA 91910
5662633400
..ADEA HI~DA
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
~662b33800
,E.ARD B1"" E/KAREN J
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5662634200
ALLISON GLORIA B
SPRING VALLEY CA 91977
Gorman, Tap~n A/Jeanne E.
. ...
Chula Vista, CA 91910
( o. r X
l~ . ( .11
CO Ill"
COOl
COI':
t L: 0 I; [ J
,~ o' C:C
c . ,-,~'!il
"
\
\
/
~
C.P~'
..(J C; "
C.',;C
~. ocr
o .~. .c)
, O'C~J.
C.' c'C)
'- Q ~,'c.1[
\ ')'J ..l+
. . ._,~__~~",",_._.~.__._....o..__,__...........,----"",_,^"
5671021000
FRISI.GcR LORkAINE A
ChU1A VIS1A CA ~1910
5671021400
FAJ~A. GORDON L/LAVAI.E ~
ChU1A VISTA CA 91910
5671021b00
GOO~~AN BuN.IE L
J
ChULA VIS1A CA 91910
5671022200
SlA~EA AR~O.D J/CAliOLYN
~ JO ' _
CnULA VISTA CA ~1911
TRS
5671022600
PATTE~SuN NSUELO C TR
CHULA . .TA CA 91910
5671023000
GERhAh KICHA J/LILLIAh
CHULA VIS CA .1910
5671023~00
~ARTIu lHtO~OAE F/EETTY E
~ ,. ~. -~
CHULA VIS1A CA 91910
5671023800
KOHR ALKA " TR
;;r.LL oJ"'" ... '"'
C~ULA VISTA CA .1910
5671024200
EL GAR COhS1RUCTION IhC
SAN DIEGO CA 92159
5671024600
CITY uF ChUL STA
C/O CITY ~ GER
276 FOU AVI:.
CHUL ISTA CA 91910
5671500300
WE~AS EUL~ARO
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
5671500700
CA~~BLLL RObEhT E/EVFLYN ~
'Ill I
CliULA VIS1A CA >1910
a.__~_....__...,__ ._.___ _. .'.'"
~671021100
nERNANDE~ ANDRLS/"ARY E
.-
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
5671021500
SKINNER JULIUS W/IRENE E
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
5671021900.
~EIR
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
5671022300
011S0N GLADYS
-
CHULA VIST6 CA 91910
56710227C0
hI OS E A
SAN YSIDkO CA .2143
5671023lUO
hAAS REUDEL/iU1H E
CHULA VI~TA CA 91911
5671023500
hORRIS ROBERT C/1INDA L
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
5671023900
hAUK JOHANNA
\1ULA VISTA CA
91910
56710243uO
CITY OF OH VISTA
C/O CITY ~NAG~R
276 F TH AVE
CHU VI~TA CA 91910
5671031400
hALL "ARVIN/GEORGIA TRS
l
SA~ DIEGO CA 92110
5671500400
10PETE TORIBIO U/LOUkDES N
V- ~~
SAIl DIEGO r-9'2154
5671500800
KOSEIi DOAOTHY L
...
CP.UL6 VI~TA CA 91910
J l
.,
.-
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*'
.
.
.
.
.
~
.- ---~----....--~... I -,~-,,,,-~,~,-,~---'--"~'--~'~"-"'---" -- .j.~
l
. 5671020 eo 0
CLE~E~SO~ ORVIL J Tii
1 -
C hU L A V IS TA CA 91910
.
. 5671021200
GREEN TERRYLD C/CATHAliBE E
- .
CHULA V IS TA CA 91910
.
.....
CO. r\ . 567102160 C
C . ( .~L ~DRE FLORA S
r oel"l. CHU LA V IS TA CA 91910
~ .
(; one)
c ce ( ~
'::0(;( . 5671022000
,_ 0 Ie!.. 6-ATTE kS ON NELLI E D
C.~.'~ _L
C HU LA V IS TA CA 91 91 0
.
. 5671022400
~EliSON CON SULLC CR Th
~~..
CHULA V IS T A CA 91910
.
\
. 56710,,2800
"AR~UEZ JOR~ S/CA iiOLE G T liS
C!iULA VISTA CA 92012
.
. 5671023200
JOSLIN PATRICIA K
C HU LA VISTA CA 9191 0
.
. 5671023600
~ARTUELLI AL IC E J
CHULA V IS lA CA 91910
.
,.
o . r-~~
.0 (;.{:.
c. ~ 1
: oc ( @t
O. C 1
. ae".
c. r'-l ~
'- ~ ~.c;;.1t
5671024000
ifRLIN LIVING TRUST 05-03-90
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
\.
TA
.
5671032300
BOWDn DEAN T TR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
.
I
5671500500
~Y ii/CANDIE L
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
\ )
/\".'
-~
5671020900
~"hNUELA
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5671021300
HACKENbERG FAED I/JU.E D
C~ULA VISTA CA 91910
5671021700
~/ShIRLEY I
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5671022100
~CKI.LEY LAWRENCE
~ LA V!ST A CA 91910
TE.
5671C2,,900
~ER"AN ~ICAAEL J/LILLIAN T
. J
CHOLA VISTA CA 91910
5671023300
HAAS REUBE.'~OTH
...... l .. _____~
CHOLA VISTA CA 1911
5671023700
HAYDON PEGt;Y L
CHULA VISTA CA 9i910
5671024100
IE FRIANT JACiUES L/~ARY
Ll 1 . --
SAN DIEGO CA 92109
E TIi
56710325CO
~AhK FIFTH AVEbUE VENTURE
C/O FRED KLEINoUb
. -- -........ ... ...-
SAN DIEGO CA 92110
5671500600
"AR~OLEJO VEb~RA J/l'ARIA D c
CROLA VISTA CA 91910
,~,_''''-'-_________.,_ M.._ '. ___....__
5671501100
IGUfLt.Ri< J~rInA A
OCEANSIDE Cll
.L:
567150230~
CLE~EhT GARY VALES ~A~Y
CR ~A VIS1A CA 91910
:""'":'I 5671502306
(0_,', :,c,; KUSH ~AJE~ A
(C6~1'/[:~ ~91910
C 0 U lc,;
CO."< '
t ":::01:1]5671502312
" 9. C,~C ~ LAliRt.NfE Pr Tli
C.I,.;t;"t LA" SA CA 91941
t.,
,
\
\
I
<
p.~"
c.
, .0 C;.:
C.',.n
~ OC::.
c . ~ .Cl
: Oe(.
C . ' :0
'- <l4.,..C&
\~) -/'1
. _).~ t
5671502316
LUPEZ AUREA G
~CA
91910
5681103000
~OYA PA~ThEiSaIP
CIO LLE r.AThEli CO
~78
568181050U
AhASTASI YiICHAEL 1990
~ULA VIS!A Ch 91910
TAUST
5681810900
MARlIN FRANK ~/ALETnA
ESCONLIDO CA .2027
D ns
5681811300
LON G oE ACH SA> K
CIO !'lADDY ,.iTT
SANTA AhA CA .2711
5661812300
5TE/F INVESTORS LTD
~RK K STi.NDER _
BONITA C1I 91902
5681812700
CENTRE TO.ER ASSOCIATES
~2022
5661813100
SAN DIEGO COUNTY h
IT,
SAN DIEGO, . 92111
. " AUTHI
~6715023(;1
~SV
~92101
0,671502305
~,hK FER.HDC
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
~671502309
~A~TINEZ AhGEL ~/ISELA G
L _ _u_
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
~671502313
FLYNh PATRICK H/LOLA E
H
CHULA VI~T" CA 91910
~6611018uO
h~KS VE~OhICA TR
lI!l'!l"'!!v'.,
DEL ~Ai CA 92014
~6S1S10200
N~K LEO.A A
till' ___
CHULA VISTA CA
91910
~6618106,,0
'-'iReLL ;;YLVlA
CHULli VI~TA CA
L TR
9 ~910
S661811000
~Ai:ESE PAUL
;;AN DIEGu CA 92139
~66181l9uO
ECKE4T RICEA~D K Sli TR
r/e IORR~Y PINES PliO}
LA JOLLA CA .2036
S6b161281J0
SAL DIEGIJ COuNTY HOUSIhG
~Y
, !r!1 - r
SAN D E IJ, c ~2111
SH
EGIJ, CA 92111
/
~ ,.1-._
J
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
"
"
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1'IGl>T Ilot
.
.
..
AUTii( ..
.
AUTii( '.
~
--
co. r1 ~
(; eCi'C)
C 01 (..
(.'on.c~ ~
r C C. (
I '.= 01;( .
. '.01 CI (
ce~~
-------..~.- ,,-,-.- ..,._......-~- -..-. --.-
.
5671500900
:OiiEE RD ReBERT "/ AS TR 10 C
.1.
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5671502302
~
~1910
.
56715 C2 30 6
t.litiS DORIS A
--
DEPE~ IIY 14043
... u
5671502310
ESCOFEDO VICTOIIA I
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
.
. 5671502314
LEY V A DIAU
L -
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
,
. 5681102600
SLEVIN ORIOLL R/JOYCE
1
C HU L~. VISTA CA 91910
\ ,
\ . 5 68 18 10 30 0
~IAI
CliUEA VISTA CA 9Hl0
,
I
-
oer'.r. I~
,.0 (:t 11
: CO...:{~ ~
o e,\f".
. Q(h:C>>
Ger.: I.
" ~4..-L.
\ :::'-')'j
5681812900 5601813000
SAN DIEGO COUNTY HOUSING AUTHv SAil DIEGO
lITY ~1~Y
5 AN DIE GO, CA '"9 2111
,
5681810700
L ARBA 1E E EN e 1111 A...
---... _ _ ~.L
SAN DIEGO CA 92120
5681811100
iil F IT Ii IIAETJHA B
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
I'
5681812100
PRUITT FAIIILY TRUST 03-29-90
C/O R CE EI T L PI UI TT
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
( I
l I
5681812500
CENTI E TOilER ASSOCIATES
'f .
E CAJOII CA ~2022
..J
5671501000
CLU.EIS ~ELVIK ~
J
1s0IlSJ.LL CA 92003
5671502303
GOODIIOUGH .ALLACE Ii/CATHERINE
A
-
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
"'1:-
5671502307
.rp iiiWT C
LA IIESA CA 919~1
5671502311
.ALKER JI.l\1E~ON
- -
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5671502315
"IV AN C EC!.LIA
SA. DIEGU CA 9~139
5601102800
UI~U.Dl LUIS I/SnIRLEY L
---
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~.
5601010400
FELLHG IlA.TLA
EL CAJON C1. 92020
56 &161 08 00
~ORA1E~ ALFIEDO ~ JR/JUANNE T
,- -
. CHULA V STI CA 91911
56&1811200
1HhOUP BENJAKIII C/ADELA
LO.G BEACH CA 90015
56 t18122 00
PR U I TT F AlIlL Y T
C 0 ROllERT L
CHULA VI
56blb12600
REGALALO ISIDORO/ESTEI
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
UIITY HUUSIIIG AUTI
SAil DI
0, CA 92111
('
c(?:tfl ~
(0.-(-'
cone.) <.'
C,~:l~ A
': O. CI
ce~~ <'
\
r
.
,.
c e P C"J
..0 (;'of-' e
~Ca"::'!J
cet'{j e
. 0 (~(.
ce' K"1 e
'- <I 4., c...:
\ '.:.,~ 4-...
.\
..__U... "'U' uuuuu,_ L________u_.._
5681813300
SAN DIEGO COUI OUSING AUTEL
RITY
~,
\
,
5681820400
STANLEY DAVID B/llARY J E
.~_ _ ... k,f
SAN DIEGO CA 92154
5681820800
BURNS GEORGE L/PHYLLIS A
_ _ ...J
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5681821200
Bl.YLESS L\lCI1LE J
I _. _....' . J
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
f'"
..
5681821600
DAVIS JAI'!ES
.
CHULA VISTA
T/l'!ARlLYN R
CA 91910
..
.. 5682610200
JUS C E EL LF A n EN L P TR
'!!"IL _" .-
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
..
.. 5682610600
GOP~AN TAPPIN A/JEANNE E
- -- r' ..
CHULA VISTA cl 91910
..
...
,
5682611000
CAYLOE EAROLD E(VIVIAN A
- . "
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5682611400
TII'!I'!O~S JOHN E'~ELTRH. OLIVIA
SAN DIEGO CA 92124
.
5682611800
RYAN VICTOR 5 SR/CHARLOTTE l!
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
-
_ 5682612200
IRVINE l!ARVIN L JR/PATRICIA I'!
BOZEI'!AN I'!T 59772
,-
. 5 682 6 1260 0
CAI'!P8ELL LEONA V
... - ...
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
,.
...1...
u_ l
56 b1b20100
;IELLOI GLO~GE 1
,... , -
LA JOLLA CA 92037
,681b2CJ500
oEHR-W. THnA L TR
CROLA VISTA CA 9i910
,
"
,
\ '681620900
IBARRA I'!IGuEL A/iOSE~DA l!
CHULA VISTA LA 919iO
56616213 00
RAI'!IEE~ OSCAR P/AOSARIO 5
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5601021700
rIDDLE THOllAS ~/ALICE J
CHULA VISTA CA 9i910
56 b261 0300
~OBLES CHRISTOPHER l!
~A.HATTAN bEACH CA 90266
5682610700
CH~I5TEASE. ROBERT E/RAISER B.
RBARA A
-...
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
56626111 00
YAI,AhOTO T~U::'~
- .
CH ULJ; VIST.. LA
00-19-90
91910
5682611500
,EEEDLOVE EVELYN N
r-
CHULA VIST CA 9i910
5662611900
SIDES ERI)M
- -
CHuLA VISTA CA
...-
91910
5662612700
hER~iiifZ ALl~IA
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~_.--..__....'---
56818~O~OC
FLRNA.DEZ REVOCABLE LIVING TRI
ST 12-1 lJ-90
- I -'
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5681820600
GRACE BAPTIST TE~PLE CHULA VI:
TA CALIFORNIA THE
I
CriULA VISTA CA 91910
5681821000
ACHbE~GLR NELLIE ~
- -
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
(O.T~
c:: . I ,::1
C 0.'(;
COO
~CC.(..,
I C (l1;L 5681821400
,~ Q. CL BLISS GERALD B TRUST
C...:.;i~'lICj'U'A ...---- ...-
. 11 L VISTA CA 91910
,
\
\
,.
~
r.
o.("~
.0 c;,t
c. ~ .
~_ 0(:'(
Oet.t)
: CJ(~r.
'c . ,";{']
,--Q~,'Ul
\' ~I'
-I). ..1
5881821600
CVCI PA1T.E~S LID
CLO TdE HUFrMAN CO~PAjIES
- --
SAN DIE~O CA 92116
588261040(;
CEVhLL05 DE ORTIZ ~BLCA
- --^" .-
CHULA VISTA CI 91910
5b82b0800
CDURTn, DEIoE.1 l/ESTHr.R I
I. .
CHULA VISTA Ch 91910
568261120U
FITZGiRALO LAEGIRbi-
-
BONITA CA 91902
5682611600
01ASO PAUL/DEBORAh
--- --
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
5682612000
SY,ITH~Y WILLIA~ ~/SARAH D
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
5682612400
BECERRIL iA8ILY TRUST Oo-30-9l
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5682612800
huGhE5 DORIS E
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
iPII.--....___"~..~
l
---,j
56818203,,0
~R/DONNA
~CA 91910
"
;
')
566Ib207U0
hA~ILTOK CEARLLS N III/CAROLE
J
AI
~OblITA Cii 91902.
,
,
56618211UO
~n RUBERT D
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
'I
(,
5661621500
bAITON ~lLLIH
-.-
CHULA VISTA CA
T iP Al'iELA A
~lho
''1
,Ii
,602610100
~RLS~LEY W M/ALITA B
CHeLA VI~TA CA 91910
Ii
~
5602610500
~ORLS
BE~D OR S7701
'"
...
"
'>6626109(;0
~EJR
CHULA VI~T~ CA 91910
'4
~
5652611300
~E~SON JACK LlbElTI ~
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
~
r..
5682611700
TUTT ALV H H
~A
..
91910
r.
5652612100
~UNDS DAVID M/JERELIN A
~IKE VALLEY CA 91962
~
Ie
56626125.;0
CEREZO VINCULA V/SATURhI.A D
SANTA C!bRA CA !5054
.
.
56626129uO .
aANKIN ALICE F <~KA hO.AED AL: ~
CE F> .1"-
mn VI"TA CA 91910
.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item )'1
Meeting Date 6/2/92
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: DRC-92-04; Reconsideration of appeal from
Planning Commission decision denying a freestanding sign
design for the business establishment at 830 Broadway -
Pacific Sign Construction Co.
Resolution )/,1,1'1 Denying the appeal on DRC-92-04 and
thereby approving the freestanding sign height and copy area
recommended by the Design Review Committee to identify the
business establishment located at 830 Broadway
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ~~
REVIEWED BY: City Manag~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-x-)
The applicant's proposal consists of replacing an existing non-conforming
freestanding sign with a new 35 ft. high, 99 sq. ft. pole sign with the same
basic design as the existing sign. The Zoning Administrator found that the
new sign was disproportionate and disharmonious with other signs in the
immedi ate area and referred the matter to the Des ign Revi ew Committee. The
Design Review Committee, and later the Planning Commission, upheld the
decision of the Zoning Administrator and the matter was appealed to the City
Counc il .
On April 28, 1992, City Council held a scheduled publ ic hearing and voted
4-0-1 to uphold the Planning Commission's decision and deny the applicant's
appeal. In reviewing the records the following day, it was determined that
the owners of the property; i.e., the Firestone Company, received notification
of the hearing; however, Pacific Sign Construction, who was representing the
appellant in this case, failed to receive notice of the public hearing, due to
an administrative error. This was brought to the Council's attention, and on
May 5, 1992, Counc i 1, by unan i mous vote, resc i nded act i on on DRC 92 - 04 and
reschedule a public hearing to reconsider this matter on June 2, 1992.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution denying the appeal on
DRC-92-04 and thereby approve the conceptual freestanding sign height and copy
area recommended by the Planning Commission and Design Review Committee.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On September 9, 1991, the Design Review
Committee voted 4-0 to approve the conceptual freestanding sign design subject
to a reduction in height from 35 ft. to 26 ft. and a reduction in copy area
from 99 sq. ft. to 75 sq. ft.
On October 9,1991, the Planning Commission considered the matter on appeal
and voted 5-0 to deny the appeal and endorse the Des ign Revi ew Commi ttee' s
action.
IJf- /
Page 2, Itl!lll 1'1
Meeting Date 6/2/92
DISCUSSION:
The sign is intended to provide principal business identification for "The
Firestone Store" automotive service facil ity. The sign would replace an
existing non-conforming sign which is subject to removal under the City's sign
abatement program.
The subject site is located within the C- T (Thoroughfare Commercial) zone.
The C-T zone allows one freestanding pole sign, up to 35 ft. in height and a
maximum sign (copy) area of 150 sq. ft.
The new pole sign consists of a 99 sq. ft. internally illuminated sign cabinet
supported by two metal poles extending to approximately 35 ft. in height. The
proposed sign would be placed within a 200 sq. ft. landscape planter area
located adjacent to the existing driveway entrance.
Although maximum sign areas and hei ghts have been establ i shed for all zones
within the City, the Design Review Committee has the authority to reduce sign
areas below those authorized by Code based on the sign design guidel ines and
criteria. One of those criteria, CVMC 19.60.240B, establishes an obligation
"... to review other signs existing within the area of the proposed sign to be
erected and insure that the design elements as set forth here and above will
promote and create harmonious and nonconfl icting or obstructing sign
arrangements." Therefore, the Design Review Committee considers the maximum
sign entitlements in any given zone as being the top of a range of permitted
sign sizes, with the actual sign size and height being considered on a
case-by-case basis. This is analogous to the setting of residential densities
within a range, as provided for in the City's General Plan.
ANALYSIS:
Whereas the sign proposed by the app 1 i cant is in comp 1 i ance wi th the maxi mum
height and copy area authorized in the C-T zone, it is not consistent with
prior DRC actions in promoting lower profile and less obtrusive signage along
Broadway and other major commerci al corridors, nor wi th other freestandi ng
signs in the vicinity of the site.
Exhibit "A" is a survey of 10 existing and approved signs within the immediate
vicinity of the site. The following averages and maximums are based on seven
of those signs -- the other three signs surveyed are subject to removal under
the City's sign abatement program.
Average pole sign height
Maximum pole sign height
Average pole sign area
Maximum pole sign area
21 ft.
30 ft.
58 sq. ft.
118 sq. ft.
Based on the results of the survey, the DRC recommended the following
modifications in order to maintain sign area and height compatibility with
existing signage in the immediate vicinity.
Jr-.2.
Page 3, Itl!lll I~
Meeting Date 6/2/92
1. The overall cabinet sign area should be reduced to 75 sq. ft.
(Sign cabinet length 15 ft. max.)
(Sign cabinet height 5 ft. max.)
2. The overall pole sign height should be reduced to 26 feet.
Based on the results of the survey and the actions of the Design Review
Committee and Planning Commission to support a 26 ft. high, 75 sq. ft. pole
sign, it is recommended that the appeal be denied in order to maintain
consistency with the height and area of other freestanding pole signs within
the immediate commercial area.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
WPC 0264p
JlI-;S/fJI-1
-
-L-..J. j:" .v....1 ':~J - I
IJ
I I
-.. . ...
lml --
L- --
- 1---
~ ---
~- < - ---,
~Y ~ I--
. 0:
~ > -
; ~
. --
< ct
-l ---
0 " ""
0 I
0 < -c1 n-f-
i. T
I ! I :
L,-
> ,-il~
z
o
~
o
<l z-.u__
I r:l;-(i'J __
WAY 11:_ --..
: ! I > --
-.1 ' , 0:-
f.-I'y".' I '..1-:::' -- - u ~
--- r! I I \', . _ . .. ~
:j [rn- i
SIERRA
ARIZON
T.
" '
" 1 I
: .;- -too ~ C-
.,
..-~ .
. I [
.-
.
. U
--- t- -
I :>
.
----or- Z
. ..,
> t:;i
ct
-
- -- -
-
:
.
:r ...
u ,.;:;
..,
.... ~I
- II
- n
K
~~ :
..CtATI~ !
I ;
. ,T
: ! ! : I
"\
..... \... ./
-,-
l :
:
.1___
.. _~ _'_ _ _ _ _ _. J.._
: -
.. __J roo'
. . ---
, .
. ' '-
,-
,
.
'-vl/ -
:>
I
I RRA WAY
~.r
rei
~I
IC IC
..... J
>
-'
--. f-- :z:
. - -. ...... ~
.....
L'
,
,
.
.... .;.J
,
,
I
I
.
.
" '
, .. -... --
...{--- --
a:
c
o
...
<.>
~.. .. ...
t
~
r
.
..
~
.
.
-,~.- wtE
. ::l
ST. Z
W
> I
Cl '
(FI~D~~ ;:1 r.u,~ CIJ. 1
9~~ W.J~ .
( Dill.. .~~. 04) .
LOCATOR
. JJ./~>
--
'-
~
-
-
-
~
-
1-
'---
'--~--
Z
;I:'--L
ct f----
...JI_~--
a:
w-
>-
a:_
-'----
---
1
1
n-r-
! i ~
'-
~-~
1-
~
-= -1 L
-
-
_7
- PROJECT
-SITE
UJ;I~~ L
WAY a:
~
>
~~.
, "
""
~
>
T 1 I I'" i---
',>,i i '.J
T , '"
, I i
- \ "
--...:
---'
--.:
-----
>-
- - -- ;
.---- C
0(
r- -- 0
, a:
,
, CD
i[
;
fllD't.:NUII.
_ RIn .... U. ~
.
., """'CAI
..--
n_" :
>-
.
,
--- t-
o w
--_..}- :)
,
w
--- -
!
I
I
,
I
E:
~
~ '~:
i'"
r ~',
,
,
"
, .---
--.-
I;
II>
'"
I-- .
I--
I-~
L.-
... s.n. kI' ~let ("'II ,". .I'/D' lIItl!l'
... ....uwl.a.t...C...,.-14' "'m' Ill....'.
'.5'/ ,
l1'~IAI.-..leunkJ'OIeT1el.t(""ea~l.tJI"I..lI.'"
IU'/15",,*,)
.. """"'1") ... JIlIn,', ,...1. -If' .It'IJ7' Ill"')
DO ........,. (A)- .n f1...n_c...',-JO' ."'41' .,"',
DI ~. ... t.ft 01, 1"'" . 1.1' 11'/11' Il'..,
........'1. ... All<<T.W.C...,.....'....'.......,..,
_~ _h........
MIl ~ h.... f...... Cl. ("'1..' . "/n' II'''''
I.,........, ... S....."....,.I.."'. "'15' 'Iflll
142.........,. ... tal1f....IIAno..,I' I""'" . "/JO' Ill"')
...-.,
..-
.-. IVA
... r,:l~'~' I'" _,ea
IO.I/JI' Ill'"
1014/
. - 'I.. .....It IlIt ... t.....-l .,. ca.,. 'In.. n_t.. ........,
(...).It..t.l.-c1t..t......~t'"''''.
(
: I: I I I
I I I I 'I
-
-
-
-
v
---
:T
w
::>
z
w
>
ct
z
ct
I
I
I
J
~
I _
_______1.__
-
-
-
:r
c..>
w
W
III
a:
~
~
K
_ '-"
: I ! : I
,
,\//
11
1:1
SIERRA
U
l:f
."L n
CI:
..
c
'"
u__
.....
~I I
{ ARIZONA
1/1 i
FIH-4f~~ ~ ~IVN J
'd~() ~WAY
NORTH (Dp..c, - 1~ - 04- )
T
~- ~
\ JA
/
-I
v_
-
f--
f--
CI:~ r
-"
c- CI:
ICl
-.,.......,
f-- _ ~u
f-... ..
h- - 1--
f-- - "I--
f-... - ~ i--
~'"
f-... - GAR[)
ST;~J;I
I 'I '
j ,
-;--
~v-
CHULA
VISTA
WAY
>
G
.
.. ~.J
'-- --.
I--
t:
-
t
STREET
U
roo .-
,
WESTBY
STREE
t
.co" lIJ
~
ST. Z
T lIJ
>
<l:
/~
]~
I ~IT '~"'D
-
I--
LOCATOR
VEY AREA
IJ/"~
".
~~
~-l
-....
.111
-i" "
;1-
.90
d)'
-""t
,<05
~f
-~~
'?
Os.
I
--
,
-90
t
~
1
1,0' j
.,o.,fZ
t---
..I
Z Ipe
- Z ~ n!i
c" u "I'
., CiS; Ii",
(J Ihl!
~ I'll
~ 0 thh
~ !i,~11
1 ih!. I
OWe!
.... z
;:... -
_. z:
t~l I.:::
"1 ;1 15
c::.~Q..
-- .l'V~OZJ~
-: ~
--- -
_ ~n?-
,
-f"
13 .
- "'-
'~
, .:s! ~ I
'~
" ~
. '"
'~, "
" " ,
.... " "
~ """ ",
'.
,
,
"
~
- -
.001 ..I
I~
-Z.~
~'.
1"-
I"'
11
.
/[,/~7
J
..
C)
-'
~
-
'I~..I~
"
~
~I
!I
1 ~
~
)
.
,01"
.U It!' 8"
~
{'
. ,
f-
..{\
-r
~
-
J
~
,
APPEAL STATEMENT
1,-/...1
.
.
I
City of Chula Vista ..
Planning Department
Date Received C3 Icrl - I
Fee Paid I~~
Receipt No. "\"'\b II
Cue No: ,12-("" '12 -0,,\
Appeal Form
Appea' frqm the decision of: CJ Zoning C Planning g Design Review
Administrator Commission" Committee
Con sirlA.c1i~
Phone {,I If I '-f -''1 -IS (,(,
9J9Sb
Please state wherein you believe there was an error in the decision of C ZA 0 PC BDRC
for the property located at: ~3o Bro"-d./AJO..Y
() O(~lt\~, of! 6/10""' S .;>(".,.. do ,)f c.r eac.f., r't'le~~
.>",i 0; +r.:"t~ ~ ",:'fE, 6. hi, ht of 35 ~1
.f Do $;",,',I4Ir /'I...t...~~ J"c..~fe~ ,''' Bro .,ft.. SIN'l;/"" Jet
.hem.. bu.... .~.rm.\+t~ lo.'9Lr s'3n5 "'~#.. .35 fed hc.i6~,t.
\
Si~ 1~~
f~A(
. Date
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(This form to be filed in triplicate.)
PL-60
Rev. 12/83
1'1- /~ I 1'1- ~I,
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE RESOLUTION
1'1 -/ /
RESOLunON NO. DRC-92-04
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DESIGN
REVIEW COMMITTEE REGARDING THE PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION OF A 34.S Fr. HIGH FREESTANDING
SIGN FOR THE FIRESTONE STORE LOCATED AT 830
BROADWAY
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for the review of the design for a pole sign was
filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on August 1, 1991, by Firestone
Real Estate; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator exercised his authority, granted to him by City
Council, pursuant to Zoning Ordinance 19.60.220, to review the design of all signs in the City
in order to prevent construction of signs which could potentially be disproportionate or
disharmonious with adjacent signs or structures, and therefore tend to be aesthetically
undesirable, and considered the request made by the Firestone Store for the construction of a
34.S ft. high, 98.25 sq. ft. sign on the property located at 830 Broadway; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator found the proposed sign design inconsistent with
the average height and sign areas of other permitted signs within a 500 ft. radius from the
project site, and referred the items to the Design Review Committee for further review; and
WHEREAS, on August 26, 1991, the Design Review Committee considered the
aforementioned sign request; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee heard testimony from the applicant
concerning the merits of the project and arguments from the Planning Department in opposition
to the proposed sign; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee considered all of the design criteria set forth
in the Chula Vista Design Review Manual, and voted 4-0 to conditionally approve the requested
sign on the basis:
1. That the Chula Vista Design Manual states that signs should be compatible with
nature, character, and design of the locale and uses they serve.
2. That signs should be designed as supportive elements to the land use.
WHEREAS, in reviewing this criteria, the Design Review Committee determined that
the subject sign was not in keeping with the average sign area and height of other pole signs in
this locale and was, in fact, exceeding the average sign height and average sign area.
WHEREAS, the project is exempt from environmental review as a Class 11 (a)
exemption.
/ t/., /,)..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE DESIGN REVIEW
COMMITTEE approved the conceptual sign design proposal subject to a sign area reduction to
a total of 75 sq. ft. and sign height limitation to a maximum of 26 ft. in an effort to maintain
sign area and height compatibility with existing signage in the immediate area and in order to
improve the street scene along Broadway.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 26th day of August, 1991, by the following vote, to-wit:
A YES: Chair Gilman, Members Flach, Landers, Spethman
NOES: None
ABSENT: Member Alberdi
~atJ.i3r!/~lvUV
Barbara GilmanlC~air
(DRC-92-ll4)
PI'/}
PLANNIG COMMISSION RESOLUTION
11/- IJ!
,
,
'1
j
RESOLUTION NO. DRC-92-04
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW
COMMU 1,bb DECISION TO CONDmONALLY APPROVE A POLE
SIGN AT 830 BROADWAY
WHEREAS, a duly verified appeal form was filed with the Planning Department of the
City of Chula Vista on September 9, 1991, by Pacific Sign Construction for Firestone Real
Estate, and
WHEREAS, said appeal requested that the condition imposed by the Design Review
Committee requiring a reduction of the overall pole sign height to 26 ft. and sign area to 7S sq.
ft. be deleted, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said
conditional use permit application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was
. given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to
property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior
to the hearing, and
WHEREAS, the hearing 'was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m.,
October 9, 1991, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission ~d said hearing was thereafter closed, and
WHEREAS, the project is exempt from environmental review as a Class 11 (a)
exemption.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
finds as follows:
a. Signs should be designed as supportive elements to land use.
The existing wall signage in conjunction with the more moderately designed, in
terms of sign height and signage area, pole sign will provide adequate
identification for the facility. .
b. Signs should be compatible with the nature, character, and design of the locale
and land uses they serve.
The sign under consideration, as proposed, would be significantly higher than any
other sign in the immediate area.
/tJ~/->
.
I
.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED 1HA T a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED 1HAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION hereby denies
the requested appeal, and approves the conceptual sign design submitted by the applicant subject
to a reduction of the overall pole sign height to 26' and sign area to 75 sq. ft. (maximum) as
approved by the Design Review Committee, this 9th day of October, 1991, by the following
vote, to-wit:
AYES:
Commissioners Carson, ('-""mas, Decker, Fuller, and Martin
NOES:
None
ABSTENTION:
None
ABSENT:
Commissioner Tugenberg
.
i:rffld~
Su Fuller, Chair
ATTEST:
1;~ ~ pj-c<.
cy pley, 'Secreti'ry
(DRC-92-l)4)
It!-" If,
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
MINUTES
}if"/?
, .
(
\..
......
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
-10-
AUGUST 26. 1991
6.
DRC-92-04
Firestone
830 Broadwav
Pole Sian .
staff Presentation
Assistant Planner by Wolfe presented the proposal, which
consists of the removal of an existing non-conforming
sign and the subsequent construction of a 35' high pole
sign with corporate identification. The proposed sign
will be placed at approximately the same location as the
currently existing pole sign, within a landscape planter.
Ms. Wolfe stated that the proposed pole sign did conform
to the requirements of the zone (CT), but did not oberve
the Design Review Committee's policy for low-profile
signage along major commercial corridors.
Ms. Wolfe stated that staff had conducted an informal
survey of permitted signage within a 500' radius; she
informed the committee that the average pole sign height
within the area was approximately 21 'feet, with the
average sign area being 58 feet. She stated that after
taking the survey information, site constraints, and the
committee's low-profile signage policy into
consideration, staff was recommending that the overall
pole sign height be reduced to 26 feet and the sign area
be reduced to 75 square feet. She added that as an
alternative, a low-profile monument sign could be
considered.
Committee Ouest ions
Member Landers asked why staff's recommended height was
not closer to the average 21' height of other signs in
the area? Ms. Wolfe responded that staff felt that due
to the height of the building, and the size of the
signage, the sign needed to be higher than the typical
signs in the area. She added that the site lent itself
to the increased height, as the lot is wider and contains
quite a. bit of landscaping to serve as a buffer. Gilman
asked about the building's height; Terry Dilgard stated
that he believed the building to be 18 feet high.
Aoolicant Resoonse
Terry Dilgard, of Pacific Sign Construction, addressed
the committee, informing members that Firestone had
contacted his company as a result of the city's sign
abatement program. He stated that the zoning ordinance
allowed the sign area based on frontage, and that the
height was likewise permitted by ordinance. He noted
I'I"/~
,
"-
'-
DESIGN REVIEw COMMITTEE
-11-
AUGUST 26. 1991
that within staff's survey area, the three lots with 100'
frontage are the three large signs, with over 100 square
feet of siqnage. Mr. Dilgard cited other examples of
legal signs within the area, and noted that within the
past year Pep Boys had received a sign permit for similar
height and area to that presently requested. Mr.
Hernandez responded that the committee's responsibility
was to ensure that sign design was harmonious and
proportionate to adjacent signs, as well as being
aesthetically pleasing. He stated that to determine
whether these criteria were being met, staff had surveyed
signs in the area, and that it was from the information
thus obtained that staff had based its recommendations.
Mr. Dilgard pointed out that it is unclear to applicants
whether or not they can actually obtain signs that
conform to zoning requirements. He added that he had no
way of being sure that he could obtain approval for a
given sign, regardless of whether it met city sign height
and area requirements as stated in the section relating
to the particular zone.
Committee ResDonse/Discussion
Member Landers stated that she felt staff's
recommendations to be reasonable, based on the height of
the building, and that she found the recommendations more
than adequate to advertise the business. She added that
the committee's intent was to reduce the clutter along
Broadway, pointing out that photographs presented
displayed that the area did have a cluttered appearance
with regard to signage. Flach and other members agreed
with this assessment.
MSUC (Landers/Spethman) (4-0, [Alberdi not present]) to
approve DRC-92-04 subject to the recommendations listed
in the staff report.
D. STAFF COMMENTS
Assistant Planner informed the committee that the applicant
for Oxford Terrace, a previously approved project, had
provided photographs of the play structure equipment. This
item was provided for the committee's information only.
B. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
IV"-/;
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
) 0/-- ,).()
ITEM 5:
PUBLIC HEARING: DRC-92-04: APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIEW
COMMITTEE'S DECISION TO CONDITIONALLY APPROVE
INSTALLATION OF A 34.S FT. HIGH FREESTANDING POLE SIGN AT 830
BROADWAY - The Firestone Store
Associate Planner Hernandez gave an overview of the project, noting that the Design Review
Committee (DRC) had approved the conceptual pole sign design subject to reduction of the pole
sign's area and height, as suggested by staff. On September 9, 1991, the applicant had filed an
appeal seeking to retain the proposed sign design as submitted, and citing that other businesses
of similar nature, which were located along Broadway, had been permitted to instaIllarger signs
with a 35 ft. height. Staff recommended that the appeal be denied.
Commissioner Martin asked if the DRC had approved the proposed sign, or a smaller sized sign.
Associate Planner Hernandez answered that the DRC had approved the sign design with a
reduction in the height of the sign to 26 feet to conform to the surroundings.
Commissioner Martin questioned why Firestone would not agree to a 26-foot sign. Mr.
Hernandez replied that the question would have to be answered by the Firestone representative.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Terry Dulgard, Pacific Sign Company, representing Firestone stated that the size of the sign was
based on the linear frontage of the property; a minimum SO-foot frontage is needed for a ground
sign. The property next door had a 35 ft. high sign, with over 130+ sq. ft. of signage. Mr.
Dulgard said that was Firestone's argument--that there were other businesses on Broadway like
theirs with the same frontage that were allowed to have 35 ft. high signs. He felt the sign was
compatible with the use of the property; if it was lowered down 8 ft., it would be visible from
about a block away which would be enough to make a safe lane change. If the sign was lowered
to 26 ft., the sign would be hidden by the building which is 20 ft. high.
Commissioner Martin asked for clarification as to the top of the sign.
Mr. Dulgard said the sign currently was 42 ft. high, and lowering it by 8 ft. would make it 34.S
ft., which was the applicant's proposed height.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Chair Fuller asked about other signs which did not have to go before Design Review. What was
the criteria, and if the other signs were conforming.
Assistant Director Ken Lee said most of it was because of the timing. In terms of the one
particular sign Mr. Dulgard had cited--Tire World--it had been under discussion for
approximately 1-112 years with the applicant and the City Attorney. It had not gone to Design
Review, because it had not started out in that manner. The Design Review Committee had just
recently been utilized in this capacity because of a change in the ordinance. Mr. Lee agreed
with Mr. Dulgard regarding some of the signs on Broadway being partially blocked by buildings,
and with zero setbacks. It was very difficult when comparing with other signs, when they went
in, and under what circumstances.
/'1'';' J
There was further discussion comparing signs in the area, sign heights, and building locations.
Commissioner Casillas commented that the Planning Commission should be consistent in
supporting the Design Review Committee. He would support the recommendation to deny.
MSUC (Casillas!Decker) s-o (Comml~~loner Tueenbel'l absent) that the appeal be denied,
and that the PIaDDin& Comml~~lon approve the conceptual sign deslp, subject to an overall
pole sign height reduction to 16 n. (max), and sip area reduction to 75 sq. n. (max), as
Indicated In staff sketch I.
ILl" ;J. :J...
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
AND
RESOLUTIONS
1L/~13
Minutes
April 28, 1992
Page 5
14. PUBUC HEARING DRC-92-04: APPEAL OF TIiE PLANNING COMMISSION DE<JSION
DENYING A FREESTANDING SIGN DESIGN FOR TIiE BUSINESS ESTABUSHMENT AT 830 BROADWAY -
PA<JFIC SIGN CONSffiUcnON COMPANY - The Design Review Committee and Planning Commission voted
unanimously to deny a freestanding sign design to identify the business establishment located at 830
Broadway. However, both the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission approved a scale down
version of the same sign design to ensure proper addition of the proposed freestanding sign with other signs
within the immediate commercial neighborhood. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director
of Planning)
This being the time and place as advertised the public hearing was declared open. There being no public
testimony, the public hearing was declared closed.
Councilman Moore questioned whether the applicant had been notified of the meeting date and time.
Robert Leiter, Director of Planning, responded that it was his understanding that the applicant had been
notified but he would check to see if there had been a possible misunderstanding regarding the meeting
date. He informed Council that the department was updating all design guidelines which would include the
sign guidelines. The purpose of the sign guidelines would be to get more specific examples of the types of
signs that are acceptable at certain locations and to indicate that those would normally be approved and that
larger signs would require special circumstances for approval.
Councilman Moore felt there was a lot of discretion left regarding design features. He questioned whether
the Design Review Committee had made modifications regarding the original recommendation.
Mr. Leiter responded that the DRC had followed the staff recommendation regarding the item. Staff
analyzed the sizes and heights of signs in the surrounding area and based their recommendation on trying
to maintain compatibility between the new signs and existing signs in the area. The proposed sign would
replace a sign being removed under the sign abatement program.
Mayor Nader stated the DRC and staff had specified sign requirements and if the proposed sign came within
those regulations it would automatically be approved.
Mr. Leiter responded that Mayor Nader was correct.
Mayor Nader stated he had concern regarding the sign approval process and was glad to see a set criteria
a to what would be approved. If the applicant had been notified and chose not to attend the meeting he
felt the staff recommendation was reasonable and therefore would support it.
RESOLUTION 16607 OFFERED BY MAYOR NADER, reading of the text was waived, passed and approved
4-0-1 with CoWlci1man Malcolm absenL
RESOLUTION 16607 DENYING TIiE APPEAL AND APPROVING TIiE FREESTANDING SIGN
HEIGHT AND COPY AREA RECOMMENDED BY TIiE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DESIGN REVIEW
COMMITTEE TO IDENTIFY TIiE BUSINESS ESTABUSHMENT LOCATED AT 830 BROADWAY
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
a. Joseph W. Garcia, 484 5th Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, recommended that the City contact
Southwestern Community College in an effort to recruit Spanish students as interpreters for City
J~'- .J.1
RESOLUTION NO. 16607
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA DENYING THE APPEAL AND APPROVING THE FREESTANDING
SIGN HEIGHT AND COPY AREA RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE TO IDENTIFY THE
BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED AT 830 BROADWAY
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the project is exempt from environmental review as a Class II(a)
exemption; and,
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee, at their September 9, 1991, regular
meeting considered the installation of a 35 foot high, 99 square feet
freestanding pole si9n for the property located at 830 Broadway; and,
WHEREAS, in reviewing the sign design criteria established in the Zoning
Ordinance, the Design Review Committee determined that the proposed sign was not
in keeping with their prior actions to promote lower-profile, less obstrusive
signage along Broadway and other major commercial corridors, nor with the average
sign height and area of other freestanding pole signs in the immediate commercial
vicinity; and,
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee approved the conceptual freestanding
sign design subject to a reduction in sign area from 99 to 75 square feet and
height from 35 feet to 26 feet; and,
WHEREAS, on September 9, I99l, an appeal was filed by Pacific Sign
Construction Company for Firestone Real Estate which requested that the
conditions imposed by the Design Review Committee requiring the above mentioned
modifications be deleted; and,
WHEREAS, on October 9, 1991, the Planning Commission denied said appeal
based on the following findings, but approved the scaled down version recommended
by the Design Review Committee.
A. Signs should be designed as supportive elements to land use.
The existing wall signage in conjunction with the more moderately
designed, in terms of sign height and signage area, pole sign will
provide adequate identification for the facility.
B. Signs should be compatible with the nature, character, and design of
the locale and land uses they serve.
The signs under construction, as proposed, would be significantly
higher than any other sign in the immediate area.
N~~
- ~
Resolution No. 16607
Page 4
PASSED, APPROVEO and AOOPTED by the Ci ty Council of the City of Chul a
Vista, California, this 28th day of April, 1992, by the following vote:
YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmembers:
Grasser Horton, Moore, Rindone, Nader
Councilmembers:
None
Councilmembers:
Malcolm
Councilmembers:
None
....6 ~~
i m Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
./
/" . ,/ (/
'- , . -.. 1/ '_/' I 'e ~ c ~
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby cert ify that the foregoi ng Reso 1 ut i on No. 16607 was dul y passed, approved,
and adopted by the City Council held on the 28th day of April, 1992.
Executed this 28th day of April, 1992.
/1 _ ~ /'
I - /, I~'
~1' ..,! 'I I -;- /Il{: I'
_ -<.. {"'__r- ~_ 1..( ~ '-- \....({. ,-/(( N
Beverly AI Authelet, City Clerk
Jll ;J.. ~
. ...
RESOLUTION NO.
I ~ u lJ9
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 16607
AND DENYING THE APPEAL AND APPROVING THE
FREESTANDING SIGN HEIGHT AND COPY AREA
RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE TO IDENTIFY THE
BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED AT 830 BROADWAY
The city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the project is exempt from environmental review as a
Class ll(a) exemption; and,
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee, at their September 9,
1991, regular meeting considered the installation of a 35 foot
high, 99 square feet freestanding pole sign for the property
located at 830 Broadway; and,
WHEREAS, in reviewing the sign design criteria established in
the zoning Ordinance, the Design Review Committee determined that
the proposed sign was not in keeping with their prior actions to
promote lower-profile, less obstrusive signage along Broadway and
other major commercial corridors, nor with the average sign height
and area of other freestanding pole signs in the immediate
commercial vicinity; and,
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee approved the conceptual
freestanding sign design subject to a reduction in sign area from
99 to 75 square feet and height from 35 feet to 26 feet; and,
WHEREAS, on September 9, 1991, an appeal was filed by Pacific
Sign Construction Company for Firestone Real Estate which requested
that the conditions imposed by the Design Review Committee
requiring the above mentioned modifications be deleted; and,
WHEREAS, on October 9, 1991, the Planning commission denied
said appeal based on the following findings, but approved the
scaled down version recommended by the Design Review Committee.
A. Signs should be designed as supportive elements to land
use.
The existing wall signage in conjunction with the more
moderately designed, in terms of sign height and signage
area, pole sign will provide adequate identification for
the facility.
I~- J. 7
B. Signs should be compatible with the nature, character,
and design of the locale and land uses they serve.
The signs under construction, as proposed,
significantly higher than any other sign in the
area.
would be
immediate
WHEREAS, on April 28, 1992, the city council held a scheduled
public hearing and voted 4-0-1 to uphold the Planning Commission's
decision and deny the applicant's appeal; and
WHEREAS, in reviewing the records the following day, it was
determined that the owners of the property, i.e., the Firestone
company, received notification of the hearing, however, Pacific
Sign Construction, who was representing the appellant in this case,
failed to receive notice of the public hearing, due to an
administrative error; and
WHEREAS, on May 5, 1992, council, by unanimous vote, rescinded
action on DRC 92-04 taken by Resolution No. 16607 and rescheduled
a public hearing to reconsider this matter on June 2, 1992.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL confirms
their previous rescission of Resolution No. 16607 and concurs with
the findings of the Design Review Committee and Planning commission
as set forth in Resolution DRC-92-04 and hereby denies the appeal.
Presented by
to form
~
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
ruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
Il/"' ,;.~
PROOF OF PUBLICA nON
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
ST A TE OF CALIFORNIA.
County of San D;ego:
I am a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; I am over
the age of eighteen years, and not a party
to or interested in the above-entitled matter.
I am the principal clerk of the printer of the
CHULA VISTA STAR-NEWS, a newspaper of
general circulation, printed and published
TWICE WEEKLY in the City of Chula Vista,
and the South Boy Judicial District, County of
San Diego, State of California, under the date
of Aug. 8, 1932, Case Number 71752; that
the notice, of which the annexed is a printed
copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil),
has been published in each regular and entire
issue 01 said newspaper and not in any supple-
ment thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
5/23
all in the year 19.9.2....
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at ......Cn.u.l.a....V.i.s.t.a............................
Calilornia,this.2.3. day olil'la)!................, 19..9.2
...................cu.u;..~
Signature
C'
This space is for the County Clerk/s Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
... ..No.t.l.e.e......... .........
.............................................................................
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR-
ING BY THE CHULA VllITA
CITY COUNCILCHULA
YIBTA. CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS~.~..B! GIVEN
THAT. TIE' ~ VISTA
CITY C(lUNCL will hald. pu-
blclJaarlng.._r""'fal.
lowing:
AppeiI of the DIIIgn RIVIew
COfnmItIIH'I decllIon m oandI-
__""'olgnda-
.",,,. lIlr "'" _landl=::
~n IUbmI_ Ilr FI
RHI ellala DrODGiec:I.1O be In. -
........01130-.,
PCC-12.17: A Mquelt far .
, :"'~~~c:.."'ll:
!.m"'~.'.",~
'~~iJ:J!!=
1~t!l~'~~,j~J,,\'i< ~a
llDnd"" 10_
. ",'.
ha ~i:rn:'J
.}Jr_
-:""',>.' '."', "',
...dlho
~1riCtud-
1o'1hefal.
Oft' ,and
. car-
petmlt.
ope,.
wage.
[play ~
i iand~ , abcf're:
g, _. wIIf c:onekier
refaI8d, ,.".,.nc:krienQI' 10'.".....
Cfty"Mu.F..~.
. you......---"'"
; City'. EdOn'gn, ~maur' In
~,youmayl>>lkl1ItacI"''''
=""':t==.r":J:'~
bile: hearlrv;;cfeKrltieiCf rri" fhl.
notic8, or ft'Nffan ~
_~"""'C1ty
: CWk'. 'Ofttoe.ar or prior 10 Ihe
=~tlEARINGWllL
l~~r.i.~~rr;.
i f992:.t4:OG:.P.:M.1n eCoun-
! clChamtiei'l..PUbIfc seMeN
i Building, 278iFi:iur1b ,Avenue,
i aI whIc:tI' time' III'lY perKIn cllt8r.
ll~"be_my_.
I Dlitacl:May20.11lO2'
I IlovoftyA.Aulllalol
!CV01532 ~,
JY30
File No.
PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DATE
~}..-~< 2,1''1'12-
SUBJECT
"
1--/ ) ,}.
,- "
t, l~~Q_ .~'"
d-,:Jo.,.'''(;~''
. );."1.' ",'1
;,.-c..,.' Y~J-~..>.\Y-
, ", ~,
'-_ )"--~,""'li: .\'
,-- cl>_h.......;/l....../
.\
LOCATION
!; 3~~'
,/ t)
t-+,~-,c'-"" .~\ _~" .:;l, ~
r\
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION -- BY FAX V' ; BY HAND_
I .
:5/.,JS/:jd-
; BY MAIL
PUBLICATION DATE
----4.1.-- ~ f1
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS f.:C' C:j VAcK5-.J.
NO. MAILED
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
i /..
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK .;;~ .' .,s:' '1 <c>
COPIES TO:
/
Administration (4) V/
Planning /
Originating Department
Engineering/
Others
City Clerk's Office (2) ,/'
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS 'S" /2.1
I
/'12_
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
-58-
\~ ~ 3\
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIT.
CHUlA vrSfA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public
hearing to consider the following:
Appeal of the Design Review Committee's decision to
conditionally approve the sign design for the freestanding pole
sign submitted by Firestone Real Estate proposed to be
installed @ 830 Broadway.
PCC-92-17: A request for a conditional use permit to operate
a Head Start Child Development Preschool Program @ 345
Fifth Avenue in R-3 - Zoning District - Episcopal Community
Services, South Bay Head Start.
PCC-92-34: A request for a conditional use permit to allow a
60-bed drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery center @
3 North Second Avenue in R-3 - Zoning District - Victory
Outreach.
Adopting amendments to the Cardroom Ordinance, including
but are not limited to the following: consolidation and
transferability of existing cardroom licenses; games permitted;
hours and days of operation; types of bets and wagers
permitted; charges for game playing; signage requirements;
and, other related rules and regulations. Council will consider
related amendments to the City's Master Fee Schedule.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, June 2, 1992,
at 4:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at
which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED:
May 20, 1992
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
\ l\ - -3 Cr
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY
COUNCIL of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering an appeal of the Design
Review Committee's decision to conditionally approve the sign design for the freestanding pole
sign submitted by Firestone Real Estate proposed to be installed at 830 Broadway. The Planning
Commission at their meeting of October 9, 1991, upheld the decision of the Design Review
Committee. Copies of the proposed freestanding pole sign design are on file in the office of the
Planning Department. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received in
the City Clerk's Office no later than noon of the hearing date.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this appeal in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or
in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, June 2,
1992, at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at
which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: May 20, 1992
CASE NO. DRC-92-04
Beverly Authelet
City Clerk
\ 'L\ /5_5
L ~~&Cr: I . TO- I : :
f- ~ I : ! ! : I
> '\j wO'ATI~ I r-...:\ 7/ -,....-
I-- I ~
I ,
""
~ I ~ -- '- / -
. . _~ _~. _ _ . _ _ _ 1 . . _
0 z - - I
cl ~~ - ---- ~. .J
e-i1 ~ -r - r" -
I CI - , : -
WAY 11:- - ---. , I 'l'lRA WAY
: ! , T>- , .-- it 1.,
--
- ::> El ~
Cfy' I a::,- ~ ...<1 ~
'..1.......... L.-
! 1 \ " ~ '- '
6 ..... - ..- I-- :r
, ~ .... -..
I r--- 1 ~r
"
"
" UI
"
'M.
...L--1. ~-~.~ ':'.1 .1
LJ
. .
,-
,
mm ,-
L..- ..
f-- ----
IZ f--
~ -
S' <I: ---
...J - --...,-
II:
~ > -
~
. itY ---
<I: J..J ---
:00: I
:! :rf ~I n-1'-
: I
1 I ! I l
ARIZON
, '
" , ,
: ':--~.- ~~.
.,
-_.~ . J.!. ~ E'
. I
..
.
. I
- -- t- -
1 ::> ~}
.
-...0("- z
. w
> ..
<I:
-
- --r'-
r
:r ill:
'- 0
uJ f~
., M
~
K
.. .. .;.J
,
,
,
,
,
,
L
II:
C
o
IW
<.J
.to.. ..
~. - . .
.'
t
(F1~~t-l~ 11"10' W6~~. 'J'
~ 9~t> ~DVJ~ . LOCA TOR
NORTH(D~.'\~.04 Lh3'1
-
. ,',-.#
- 0 ( ilJ
C . t t 'it
C C 1...1
( O,~ (
C C ( I S
'- 0 ,:-(
o C C}I
C . e..;; ,,-6
-
/
reLf
a l;,;(.~
( . ( J(
or II..
, . ~ .-
Of-X'
.lJ(
Q \,.;:(.1
I
I
,
.
LABL 00309 DRC-92-04 lXxnXIXuxnXlxxnnxunXUl
iiiHx~~i~~~Hixi~Hxilih~ixf HHHHHHHH~HHHHHH~
lunUlIlIlIIIlIlIIIlIlIlIlH IUUUIUIUUUUUUUUUI
XXXXXXIXXXlxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXl XIXXXIXlxxxxxxxx~xxXXXXXXXIXIl
(
XXXIXXXIXXXXXIXXXXXXXXXIXXXXX~ xxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXXXXID
X XXXX xx xx XXXXXXIXn xx xnxxxxx~ XXIXxuxnuxnXIXXXXXIXIXXUl
x xx XI XI xx XX IX xx XXXXXX IX XXXXXXl. IX IXIXIXxxnnxxxxxxxxxnUXXl
XXXXXXXXXIXXXXXIXIIXIXIXIIIII; III1111XIIIXIXI11XIXI1111XIX11
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXIXXXXXIIIIIXX{ XIXI111XIXXXI1XXI1XXIXIIXXIXU
x xxx X n xx xx XX XX IX xx IX XXXI XXXX~; XX XXIX XXIX xxn IX xx uxnnxxUl
5712810100
~RBARA A
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5712810200
ANDERSON ROBERTA T
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5712810500
AAlOLD WANDA L
. - 00 ._ .
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5712810600
IlURPHY JOBJ
I
CHULA VIST A
WIROSE I'l <DVA>
CA 91911
5712810900
JUNG LUDWIG/ELIZABETH
_ ..
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5712811000
BEJRICliON PATRICIA A <AKA TAU
EY PATRICIA>
o _ _.
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
H TiS
. lIP
5712811300
PADILLA JORGE D
I~PERIAL BEACH CA 91932
.
.
5712811700
HUEZO AGUSTII !-1.~LAJlCA
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5712811800
AGUILERA JICHO~
L _on _
SA. DIEGO CA 92139
.
\~\. - 3S
")
")
'")
'I
~
, c ( ''R UXXXXUXUUUlIIXXXlXXXXllU lIIXXnXUIXXUXlXXXXXXXXUXU
C . i ( XllXUXXlUIUnnXIXUXnnXU XXlnXlXXXUXXlXXXXXXnnXlnX
('CO' :. (. I nnunnnununununu lunununuuUUUUUUI
.. , UXXXllllXUUUUUUUUUUJ UXUUIUXUXXU.XXXXUXXUUX
G' ( \4
l_Cel. ';"'." xuxxUUXUUIUxxlXlXlXlXxn UlIxxuxxxnxxxxuxuxuxuu
"XXXIXXIIIXIXXIXXXXXXXXIXXXXIIJ XXXIXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXIXXXXIIXl
C . -.; ~ UUUIUXUXUUUUUXXUXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXUXXXUXXXXXU
xxxxXXXXXXIIIXXXIXXXIXXXIXXIX) XIXIXXXIXIXIXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXJ
~xxxxxxxxXXXXXXIXIIIXIXXXXXIXIJ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXIXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXIXXXXXIXI) XIXXXlxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXIXXXX
5712810300
BOLlIi ROBERT A
--. -
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
57128101100
TOSTADO GUADALUPE E
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5712810700
LAPIR1 TORAS S(ELSA
-- . ----
CHULA VISTA C1 91911
5712810800
URC1DO Jun
- ---
CHULl VISTA CA 91911
5712811100
BAETHER IRVlIiG G/LULA PI
.. .. -
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5712811200
PADILLO BEINY CI1LICIA
SPRING VALLEY CA 91978
/
5712811600
ST1CHOWITZ ESTELA
--- -.---.. .-
CHULA VISTl CA 91911
;
5712811500
~ARTH~ SHIHADEH J/FATIIA S
CBULA VISTA CA 91913
re'.!
o C ,( 1
( . .-
0.. ( , 5712811900
, .,.. liASLAIID DOl TR
. 0"': t-! ~/O liE ASSOCIATES
. .. JI SAX DIEGO CA 92166
QI.. Ll
~
~',
5712812000
HOU~ KEIIETH C/SHIRLEY J
-- --
CHULl VISTl CA 91911
eN
-'
:.
, ..~'C"'__'_'_."_~__'_
-"-
V\./ '=)b
=--;:'"
5712820300
!ILLAI JAI!E(E!ERITA Z
_ 1 _' _
SAI YSIDRO CA 92173
5712820700
!!ARTHlEZ !!ARIA S
___ J -.
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
'Of.it
C . r ~ 5713010100
C ( _' ~'CHOW CHOU T{HUAlG CHUIIG H
, 0.. ( 111_ u.____ .. --
C ( . i. LOS AlGELES C1 90031
~ 0.; (
o ( '. 1:J - -
C .",; '- 5713020300
,- BAUHART ROBERT E/!All1'lE
1___ _____1 _"
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
/
5712820400
FALKENBORG !ARGUERITE
Tl _..:.
CHULA VISTA CL91910
5712820800
FALKEIBOiG !!ARGUERITE
- -----
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.,
.....'1,
}
,.;
5713012800 ,
BLACKBURJI RALPH/LA VERJlE I! TR~'"
1
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5713020400
Z TR~ RODRIGUEZ ADOLFO D/SELIGSOHI
ARLEIlE A
-
-
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5713100400
SCHURICIiT RICHARD L/JEAI B TIl~
- - - - . -., . ..
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5713100500
SCHURICHT JQHI L/R~IE II
BOlITA CA 91902
5713100800
I!AK-KAI! RESEARCH(EIGIIEERING
_... w__._.._ __ ~
SAN DIEGO C1 92131
5722310900
RINIEII JULIO/!AIlGARET P
. - .
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
91911
Pacific Sign Construction
, ".h... _.
National City, CA ~1~50
\
11.:.\ - ;), '\
- ,
5713101500
JRE~A Il JR/BEVERLY J
IIIYSSA OR 97913
5722311000
I!CIORTOI ROBERT B/ELLWOOD B
-I
CHUlrA VISTA CA 91910
5722704500
WALTON DAIII
-
CHULA VISTA
E
-
CA 91912
5722700500
(" . '.4 S & I! NURSERY
o (; ,. (, l CHULA VISTA C1
! . Il
o C (.a
.'.
0(-- ( .
. JJ
Q\.. C'
oJ
p. ·
.
.
.
.
.
.
"
.
.
.
, '
>Y 5712820100
JOSEPH l!ICHAEL(!IAIlY A TRS
- ---
CHULA V IS TA CA 91 910
,
',--
r.... 5712820500
'"", H AIiKUiS GORDON S/llARY B TiS
- --- oft
CHULA VISTA CA 911
,..c--
~ ..,
Of 'iJ
,. e i I :+ 5712820900
Ot .1 - 'A!!IIlEZ JESUS AiLAUiIE T
.
,
I 0,: ( I ____ ~
01 CHULA VISTA CA 91 11
, d ~
'- <<>> ,;. {
01 ::- t'
Le..:,.",- c.. 5713020100
DO III VUIG AREII
-
C HU L A VISTA CA 91910
.-
.. 5713020500
CANIZALES RAUL R/LETI CIA L
-.. .
C HULA VISTA CA 92011
..
,
rec.f
o C.i( ,
. . ( }t
o C J( ;
. . ( 1(
0(";;( 1
.(If
QI.:C:;
..
5713100600
VANDEVEIlTER JESSIE E/SHAIlCN II
TIiS
_. J
NATIONAL CITY CA 91950
.,
.-
5 71 31 01 80 0
BALLARD FAlIILY LIVING TRUST 01
-31-90
!..v. _ IL l __,_
YUBA CITY CA 95993
,
.
5722311100
!'lURRA! IREIE F 1991 TRUST 08-~
3-91
. - - .-
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
8
('
5722705100
R ENEA U TRAVIS A
C(O TRAVIS RENEAU
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
\
\\\ -)~
\ - '_I
5712820200
GRADY Eiiiii J(IRENE H
. -.-
.CHULA VISTA CA 91911
5712820600
HERCADO MAiUEL/MARIA D
-
CH ULA VIST A CA 91911
5712821000
PEREZ JESUS/PATRICIA
T -
SAN DIEGO CA 92154
5713020200
DE CAS~ILLO CARlIEN R
- .11-1- I
SUI DI EG 0 Cl 92154
5713100300
FIRESTONE REAL ESTATE LEASIIG
CO
C10.BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE, I~
AKROIi OR 44'"
5713100700
VAIICE IiILlIA
CHULA VISTA
J
-
CA 91911
5713101900
RUBiOS IIIC
C,O AR MAl/DO
- -
CHULA VISTA
I!AIlTIliEZ&CO
.-
CA 91910
5722700300
lIASUPlOTO GEORGE/CHIYOKO
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
Firestone
.
ChuTa Vista~ CA 91911
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
IS
Meeting Date June 2. 1992
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING PCC-92-34: A request for a
Conditional Use Permit to Allow a 60 Bed Drug and
Alcohol Rehabilitation and Recovery Center at 3
North Second Avenue in the R-3 zoning District -
Victory Outreach
RESOLUTION /.~~t) Approving PCC-92-34
SUBMITTED BY: Director of ~ing ~t
REVIEWED BY: City Manager2? (4/sths Vote: Yes___No-X-)
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit
to allow a drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery center to
house a maximum of 60 adult, male residents 18 years of age and
older. The complex is located at 3 N. Second Avenue in the R-3
Zone.
The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study,
IS-92-30, of potential environmental impacts associated with the
implementation of the project. Based on the attached Initial Study
and comments thereon, if any, the Coordinator has concluded that
there would be no significant environmental impacts, and recommends
adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-30.
The notice to property owners for this item was extended to include
the area east of North Third Avenue, west of 1-805, south of SR-54
and north of "E" Street. This exceeds the normal requirement for
a 1,000 foot-from-property line notice.
RECOMMENDATION:
PCC-92-34
That Council adopt the resolution approving
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On May 13, 1992, the Planning
Commission voted 5-to-2 to recommend that the Council approve the
conditional use permit in accordance with ReSolution PCC-92-34.
On May 18, 1992, the Resource Conservation commission met to
discuss a number of proposed negative declarations, including
Victory Outreach, as well as several environmental impact reports.
Although there were four members present, there was not a quorum to
vote on Victory Outreach's negative declaration as one member lives
close to the proposed site, and was therefore disqualified
(conflict of interest). The RCC discussed the fact that this
project would be going to Council prior to their next meeting
(scheduled for June 22nd) and that any RCC member wishing to speak
to the proposal before Council would need to do so as an individual
rather than representing the Resource Conservation commission.
I~I
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 06-02-92
15
DISCUSSION:
Zoninq and Land Use
Zoninq
Land Use
site
North
South
East
West
R-3
R-3/IL
A/R-1
A
R-1/R-3P20
Vacant Care Facility/Nosotros Facility
Open/Industrial
open (Slope)/SF Residential
Campground
SF & MF Residential
Existinq site characteristics
The proposed project is located on a 4.8 acre site situated on
a ridge line which drops off sharply to the east, to KOA
Kampground, and more gently to the west and north to North
Second Avenue. Adjacent land uses include single-family homes
to the west and south, and open space and the KOA Kampground
to the north and east. The site contains two main buildings,
several accessory bui ldings, and approximately 54 on-site
parking spaces. Access is provided by two driveways off of
North Second Avenue. Victory Outreach plans to occupy the
larger 22,000 square foot structure on the northern portion of
the site as well as approximately 7,000 square feet in the
education building between the two main structures, the
triangular recreational building to the north of the main
structure and the smaller square storage building along the
eastern edge of the site.
The existing facility has been used in the past as a
residential treatment facility for emotionally disturbed
youth, first by vista Hill and more recently by Southwood
psychiatric Hospital. In February of 1991, Southwood vacated
the site and consolidated operations at their Third Avenue
facility.
On November 6, 1991, a conditional use permit, PCC-92-06, was
granted contingent on an annual review by staff. This use
permit allowed the establishment of a 12-bed residential
treatment facili ty for recovering alcoholics. The
approximately 3,000 square foot structure is used by and
called the Nosotros Recovery Home and is located on the
southerly portion of the property. This facility uses the
smaller of the two main structures as a residential recovery
home, as well as three adjacent mobile trailer homes for
classrooms and 24 off-street parking spaces. The estimated
stay for a resident with Nosotros is between three months and
one year.
Jy';;'
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 06-02-92
/5
Proposed use
Victory outreach, the applicant, plans to lease the facility
for five years and is proposing to provide an alcohol and drug
rehabilitation and recovery program, including residential
care, religious and counseling support for a maximum of 60
male adults 18 years and older. This proposal would
centralize victory Outreach's services for San Diego County in
the South Bay area. The center is proposed as a live-in
facility as opposed to a drop-in care center.
The admission criteria, as required by the State of California
Drug Abuse Treatment Program and by Victory Outreach, is
designed for individuals with primary drug and/or alcohol
abuse problems. Each potential resident is screened and,
among other admission criteria, must not have a history of
violent behavior or mental disorders, must not be a sex
offender, nor have a severe medical condition, including AIDS.
Once an individual is accepted, they are searched to ensure no
drugs or weapons are brought into the facility. In addition,
there are periodic room searches. A copy of "Persons Not
Accepted Into Rehab Program" is attached as Attachment "B" and
"Victory Outreach Christian Residential Rehabilitation
Program" is attached as Attachment "C".
At a public workshop held in the Council Chambers by Victory
Outreach on April 16, 1992, they stated that potential
residents are referred to the facility for a period of six
months to one year from a variety of sources. The majority of
referrals come from families, churches, schools and community
groups. A small percentage of residents are court referrals.
victory Outreach staff pointed out that of the 66 current
residents in existing facilities, only six are court
referrals.
Seventy-five percent of funding is through tithing by members
of Victory Outreach Church and through personal donations
given by non-Church members. The remaining twenty-five
percent comes from County General Relief funds.
It is estimated that eighty percent of the residents would be
from San Diego County, 18% from other southern California
cities, and 2% from other states.
Services provided to residents include a minimum of 20 hours
per week of pastoral counseling, structured therapeutic
activities, volunteer tutorial services, vocational counseling
and training through existing County and State agencies, job
referral placement, legal services, social recreational
services, and individual family counseling through community
IY.:J
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date 06-02-92
/5
services. Residents are taken to the various agencies in
order to obtain these services. within the first 30 days of
admission, a treatment plan is structured for each resident.
A copy of the "Victory Outreach Daily Schedule" is attached as
Attachment "0".
Residents are not permitted to have vehicles on-site or to
wander from the grounds or on the grounds unattended and
without authorization. In the event a resident leaves the
facility unattended and without authorization, or deserts
while on an outing, the project rules (Attachment "A"), as
amended per staff recommendation, would require that the
resident be expelled from the program and be either escorted
to his primary place of residence or to the Victory Outreach
Church in San Diego for discharge.
visits by family or friends are discouraged at the facility.
Instead, visiting occurs primarily on Sundays at the Victory
Outreach Church located at 590 Fir Street in San Diego.
California Administrative Code, Title 9, Section 10564
(Attachment "E") outlines the qualifications for staff and the
facility administrator. Among other qualifications
counsellors, including volunteers, "shall be competent to
provide the services necessary to provide services as
described in the plan of operation".
The counselling staff are trained on a quarterly basis at a
Victory Outreach facility in La Puente, California. Every two
months there is additional in-house training which consists of
instruction in counselling, rule enforcement, and learning the
phases a resident goes through during recovery. The State
will license the facility with respect to health and safety
factors, but does not require any particular credentials of
staff, other than those cited in the previous paragraph, nor
does it set a particular staff-to-resident ratio. Per Title
9, the State does, however, have the authority to require
additional staff if it is deemed that the staff "is unable to
provide services as described in the plan of operation".
To ensure orderliness in daily activities and 24 hour on-site
supervision, the counselling staff consists of 21 former
residents of the Victory Outreach program, with 18 present
during the day and five present during the night. Since the
facility has four wings which house 15 residents each, each
wing will have a wing supervisor, head staff, and two other
staff members supervising the residents. The night shift will
have four night wing managers and one night security, who will
remain awake throughout the night to ensure that residents do
not attempt to leave the facility, among other duties.
/5,r
Page 5, Item
Meeting Date 06-02-92
/>
The responsibilities of the counselling staff include turning
in weekly rosters of residents, preparing progress reports and
keeping up-to-date files on each resident. They also monitor
and supervise residents' daily activities, transport them to
medical, legal and work appointments and recreational
activities, as well as counsel residents on a one-on-one
basis, lead group sessions with residents and meet once a week
with other staff members and wing supervisors to discuss
residents' progress.
There will also be six administrative staff who will be on-
site during regular business hours.
The facility currently has 54 auto parking spaces and one
space for a bus. The site plan shows an additional space for
bus parking along the northern building. Twenty-four of the
parking spaces are being used by Nosotros. Since the
residents are not permitted to have their own vehicles,
victory Outreach will require 24 parking spaces for the 18
counsellors and six administrative staff on the day shift, but
have 30 available. In the event more than 30 spaces are
needed, the administrators of Nosotros have agreed to allow
the use of six of their spaces.
The on-site parking exceeds the requirements of Chapter 19.62,
Off-Street parking and Loading, zoning Ordinance. This live-
in facility is similar to a nursing home or convalescent
hospital (19.62.050.13 and "NOTE" after 19.62.050.27) which
requires a ratio of one parking space for each three beds.
This would result in a requirement of 20 spaces for the
victory Outreach program and four for the Nosotros program or
a minimum of 24 spaces on the property. Instead, there are
54.
The site plan shows a "proposed fence" separating the area to
be used by victory Outreach from the Nosotros portion of the
site. Because this fence is unnecessary and may hamper access
by emergency response personnel, it is conditioned to be
deleted from the site plan and not constructed.
As of the writing of this report, approximately two hundred
letters of support and six letters of opposition from Chula
vista residents have been received. The letters of support
mainly state that the type of program victory Outreach is
proposing will benefit Chula vista and the County and that the
location and facility are ideal. Those opposing the project
mention land use compatibility, traffic and decreased property
values as issues of concern.
J5~5
Page 6, Item
Meeting Date 06-02-92
I~
The proposed use is unclassified and requires the approval of
a conditional use permit by Council in order to locate at this
particular site.
ANALYSIS:
This facility was historically used for institutional purposes
such as residential treatment/rehabilitation, including vista
Hill and Southwood psychiatric facilities, and now the
Nosotros program. The Nosotros recovery home is compatible
with the Victory Outreach operation as both programs are for
adult males, with similar staff approaches, and both programs
deal with either drug or alcohol rehabilitation.
The "Rules-Men I s Home" (Attachment "A"), "Persons Not Accepted
Into Rehab program" (Attachment "B"), "victory Outreach
christian Residential Rehabilitation Program" (Attachment "e")
and "Victory Outreach Daily Schedule" (Attachment "0") and
other supporting documentation indicate that the program is
dedicated to the rehabilitation of drug and alcohol users and
will admit only persons who are genuinely seeking recovery
from their drug or alcohol problem.
Planning Staff visited the church facility at 590 Fir Street
in San Diego and the woman's facility on Graves street in EI
cajon. Staff was impressed with the appearance and upkeep of
these structures because each was well kept, even though older
than the majority of structures in the immediate vicinity.
The interiors were also clean and neat in that meeting areas,
kitchens, bedrooms, etc., were well ordered, sanitary and in
good repair.
To ensure safer ingress and egress from the complex, it is
conditioned that the northern driveway shall be used as an
entry point only, while the southern driveway can be used for
both entering and exiting. Both driveways, however, must be
marked and posted to the satisfaction of the Traffic Engineer.
This project must be licensed by the State of california Drug
and Alcohol Program. To be licensed, Victory Outreach must
ensure the health and safety of residents of the facility.
The state will also specify the maximum number of occupants
based on an inspection by the Marshal after approval of the
conditional use permit. This means that if the Marshal
approves occupancy for only 50 residents, this is the maximum
that can be allowed into the program. However, if the
Marshal approves occupancy for 70, the maximum that may be in
the facility is 60, because then the conditions of approval
would be the limiting factor.
15.. /,
Page 7, Item
Meeting Date 06-02-92
/5
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
At the public hearing before the Planning Commission on May
13, 1992, 15 people spoke in favor of the project, four
against, and, because of the nature of the project, four
people had mixed feelings, but felt obligated to speak for the
organization and work of Victory Outreach, while questioning
this location for a drug and alcohol rehabilitation and
recovery center. As mentioned earlier in this report, the
Planning Commission, after taking extensive input from the
public and thorough consultation amongst themselves, voted 5-
to-2 to recommend that the city Council approve this project.
After discussing the project, the Planning commission added to
the conditions of approval. Under Condition 2, referring to
the "Rules-Men's Home", the following wording was added:
"In addition, Item No. 14 shall be restated as:
'Any resident terminated for any reason will not be
permitted to re-enter the home in Chula vista for
thirty (30) days.'"
Condition 16 was also added:
"16. Where possible, applicants to the program who are
residents of Chula vista shall be given priority."
REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT:
In a letter dated May 22, 1992, the applicant requested revision of
Condition 12.a, which reads:
"12. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall:
a. Obtain licensing from the California state Alcohol
and Drug Program".
The applicant is requesting wording to the extent that upon
approval of the use permit, they would be allowed to occupy the
facility with the promise that they will obtain state licensing
within 90 days.
After some investigation with the state Alcohol and Drug Program in
Sacramento and the Fire Department, Staff recommends that the
condition be left as it appears. To allow occupancy without state
licensing may open the city to liability risks.
In support of Staff's position, Staff was told that personnel from
the State Alcohol and Drug Program have scheduled an on-site
/5'7
Page 8, Item
Meeting Date 06-02-92
15
inspection for June 10, 1992 and the Fire Department has
tentatively scheduled an inspection for June 8, 1992. If both of
these inspections indicate no or only minor repairs, the applicant
would be able to take occupancy within weeks, depending on the
needed repairs, if any. In any case, the applicant can commence
with repairs to the facility immediately upon approval of the use
permit.
CONCLUSION:
Based upon these factors and subject to the conditions noted in the
Council Resolution, Staff believes it is appropriate to recommend
approval to the City Council for an initial one year period,
subject to extension by the Council upon a finding that the
facility has functioned as stated by Victory Outreach in meetings
and in their literature, and as conditioned by the city.
The findings and conditions of approval are itemized in the Council
Resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
15"y'.
.
I
-~'
1 - .
...~
.-II . ( ~l-J", ~~" ~ 1 'LOCATOR .
e I?..J ~ "1t--ft?~1 '?uT~ "0 ~@
~ .. . .'[:a7 ( .' -:4 f1-~IDE::IoJTlAV F-~I\,..ITY ~
./ ..(UOIlTII pa - 4 2--- ~4- JY 1/~Db 1t~~Ht>v f1.~HAISI\,I"Mj
. . .
.
'111
I
l)'"
~
h
,.~
i~
. -
",'IE"
-
.....
64
,
tm
@
IN nLl(f,
~
@l
%
..~
.. "1i.J
i-
!l-1("
I I
~J
~
~
, -
---
. ,~
,.
",
7. r:il, I~~I
" 0\ \
l 1
~
1.r-J
,
, 1
-~ =-.
@
-2:!
"'..
~
'.....C'I'
, "l-
".. . ~
~-~~
~ ~ ,
~ '
O~ ~
O~ ~
~
C'1tl.J~
-~ .J J ;.I
~ E~~~
~\- '<F ~
. SF ;~~ ~El.T
~~LJ>'."TIDN
KOA ([)
I
I > wr
~~F
......k
1\
~l
l
e
.......
~
~E fT ~
I I f---J -I
- I h \-
- "'- t::
-
--- ~
;"A VA
I
1
1
f-
'fRn
I-I
1:7. .
project Location: 3 Nor.th Second Avenue.
Chu1a Vista, Ca.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 6, Map 1603
*See Attachment
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 563-310-26
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME & ADRESS
Seymour Reichbar.t
..~....._ Sara Frances Inc.
~. 943 Tenth Avenue, San Diego,
.~. PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 32
-----.
-------
I
I
!-PROPOSED
! FENCE
i
i
i
Ca.
11==
N17t5'!!'_2e5.f7
CCl.RT
ass.N.L5.'cr.v..,. ),
'EXISTlNG PARKING \
\
EXISTlNG PARKING
EXIST1NG
BUIlDING
~
,
~
.~'"
\,
'\
~~
?l:<,.
~
DEUVERY PARKI'IG
'---r
~
"-
.~.
---.
NOR11l~ ~!r~ PLAN
VICTORY
OUT REA C H
SAN
DIEGO
It
....
Ir'!";:
Z
1
w
o
LOUNGE it
o
~
~
.......
OfflCE
I :;{4J.H:tl__
~~ PA~=AAD ~ ~
Sf KITCHEN
~
.
~ BEDAM
DINING.
ENCLOSED
~~ PAllO
~
BEDRU, ~ SEDAM.
~~B
STOfWlE
BEORM.
9 ~~
_EDAM.
BEDRM. ~ BEORM.
"""""""
CONFERENCE BATH
SEDRM.
SEDAM
8EDRM. SEDRM.
ND,",,~ ~~_<;?;JND FLOOR PLAN 3
VICTORY
o U 'T R F. A C H
SAN
DIEGO
,
---1
r--- L------l
I I
~ I
r L--l
I t
t-...I. --;
I I
I L,
nl r---~
. I L_
I -----~ 1
<----- I I
~ i L....l
~r-----I I I
~I I I ...--l
~Ii I ,..--1 r
~~ I I I I
g~ I I I
I ! I I I
Y I !------""1 I
I I r--l I
I I I i!
L I ~
I I
I
L
I ~
) r---:'
L___-1--J
IS''''' ,).,
M 0
~
r..;
-
~
z
-<:
v.l
:;::
u
-<:
'"'
~
!-
;J
Z 0
ct
...I
c..
a:. ~
0
0 ~
...I
U. 0
...I
W
> !-
W
...I c.;,
a:
w ....
==~
0:0 >
...15
~
\t\
,
~
"N~@
r- OUlUNE OF ROOf'
OFFlCE
~ OFFICE
o
u
>I
.
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
1/16'".0-
VICTORY
o lJ T REA C H
s } 1'J
4
DIEGO
"
~
'"
10 '\ ~
Ie
~
, ~ ~
\ w
/5--1'1
..,..0&
lO 0
t-'
I>l
....
Q
Z
<(
tIj
z
ct
...I
D.
a:
o
g
u..
c:l
z
C
::!
::)
IXl
Z
o
i=
ct
o
::)t
O'
UJ~
$
::
u
<(
~
~
E-<
;:J
o
~
~
o
r-'
u
....
~
'.
THE em OF CllULA nSTA PARlY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign COritI"!Dutions, on all matte:
which will require'discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planriing Coliunission, and all o:::~
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
.
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, ie.. contract,.
subcontractor, material supplier.
vi ,...tnl.v 01lt rpi3:r.h
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of a1'
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnershir
interest in the partnership. .
Vi "t.orv Outreach is a non-profit
rOl-nnl-r1 r. ; on
3.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organiiation or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary cr
trustor of the trust,
Executive Director/Pastor
,
'T'nnv ~1]7man
4. Have you had more than 5250 worth of bu~iness transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No...lL- If yes, please indicate person(s):
S. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
conlmctors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
ROMIE CERVANTES 'J. R. CHANTENGO
rpnMlI.~ 'DnnPT~TlJ;''7
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contnDuted more than $1,000 to !l
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No -2L If yes, state which
Councilmember( s):
~ Is defined as: 'Any indil'idual,Jimr, co-pannmhip,joinr v~nntr~; MsOcintion, social c1ub,{rnlcnal organiZlllion, corporalion,
eSl/lle, truSI, Trub'"- syndicale, this and any olher county, city and COUIITl)\ cilY, municipalil)', district or olher polilical subdb'isicJIl.
or 011)' Ollltl' group or combinntion acting M n unil,'
(NOTE: AtI~ch addillon~f pages as neccss.1lY)
DOlle:: , January
, 1992
Sjgnntu~' C~trllclor!nPPlicnnt
VICTORY OUTREACH.
Print or type: n:lme: of ContTllctorlDppliwnt
/.5', /5 ' (R....i",",,: IL""~I
1.\.) "'.\:DISCLOSE. 1':\1)
VICTORY HOMES
OIl
~^N IlIEGO
REH/~BILITATIDN
TONY GUZMAN
EXCUTIVE DIRECIDR
PCC-92-34
u "
Attachment A
RULES MEN'S HCME
1. NO RESIDENT IS ALU:MED TO LEAVE HCME WITHOUT A STAFF PRESENT, AND THEN
ONLY WITH THE DIRECI'OR'S PERMISSION.
2. UPON ENTERING THE HCME ALL MONEY, CREDIT CARDS, PERSONAL CHECKS, AND
DRIVERS LICENSE SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE DIRECIDR FOR SAFE KEEPING.
UPON REQUEST, A RECEIPT WILL BE GIVEN TO THE RESIDENT.
3. FOR THE FIRST (2) WEEKS OF RESIDENCE, ALL c:cMMUNlCATION WITH THE OUTSIDE
WILL BE HANDLED THROUGH THE STAFF.
4. ALL PHONE CALLS SHOULD BE MADE FRCM PAY PHONE. PERMISSION SHOULD BE
OBTAINED FRCM THE DIRECTOR OR COUNSELOR BEFORE MAKING ANY PHONE CALLS. ONLY PAROLE '
PROBATION OFFICERS CALLS OR EMERGENCY CALLS SHOULD BE. MADE THROUGH THE
OFFICE.
5. UPON ADMISSION TO. THE HCMES THE RESIDENT WILL SUBMIT ALL CLOTHING AND
POSSESSIONS ON HIS PERSON TO AN INSPECTIO.N. A .SHAKEDOWN MAY BE AT ANY
TIME IT SEEMS NECESSARY.
6. ALL DRUGS, ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, AND PARAPHRENALIA ARE FORBIDDEN WHILE A
RESIDENT OF THE HCME. BEING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF DRUGS, AND FIGHTING
CONSTI'IUTE IMMEDIATE TERMINATION FRCM THE HCME.
7. ALL STREET TALK, CURSING, BACKBITING, PHYSICAL & VERBAL HORSEPLAY IS TO
BE STOPPED UPON ENTERING THE HCME.
8. ALL REQUEST AND PROBLEMS ARE TO BE CHANNELED THROUGH YOUR ROCM COUNSELOR.
9. DAILY JOB ASSIGNMENTS ARE TO BE DONE FAITHFULLY.
10. YOU MUST MEET DRESS CODE POLICY AT ALL TIMES. CHURCH DRESS CODE IS
DRESS PANTS AND TIE, UNLESS CASUAL DRESS IS APPROVED BY HCME STAFF.
11. CHURCH SERVICES, BIBLE S'IUDIES AND DEVOTIONS ARE PRIORITY FUNCTIONS
OF OUR HCME.SPECIAL PERMISSION MUST BE GIVEN BEFORE ANYONE IS EXCUSED
FRCM PARTICIPATION.
12. THE OFFICE AND KITCHEN IS OFF LIMITS AT ALL TIMES. NO EATING OR
DRINKING IS ALLC:MED IN THE ROCMS.
13. DO NOT BORRCM OTHER PEOPLE'S PROPERTY WITHOUT PERMISSION. THE SALE OF
ANY PERSONAL PROPERTY IS NOT TOLERATED IN THE HCME.
14. ANY RESIDENT TERMINATED FOR ANY REASON WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO RE-ENTER
ANY HCME IN SAN DIEGO FOR THIRTY (30) DAYS.
15.
WHEN A RESIDENT LEAVES THE PROGRAM HE IS TRANSPORTED BY A STAFF MEMBER
TO THE NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION.
If-' /1, WITNESS
RESIDENT
PCC-92-34
Atta~hment clJ"
PERSONS NOT AC.'\,;1>t'TIill
INrO REHAB PROORAM
fI . "
We do not accept potentIally dangerous resIdents Into our
rehabilitation program. Our program is so integrated with
our church activities that we will not endanger our church
families or children with the following type of individuals:
1. Sex Offenders
2. Persons with mental disorders
3. Persons with unusually violent behavior
4. Severe medical conditions, inCluding
AIDS
/5"7
PCC-92-34
Attachment Ole".
VICTORY OUTREACH CHRISTIAN
RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM
The purpose of this document is to describe the Victory Outreach
Rehabilitation Home residential program. admission criteria process.
the pl:ogram structuI:e and treatment pl:otocol and a basic rundown of
our rehabilitation pOlicies.
ADMISSION CRITERIA
The program has been carefully structured and designed into four
phases. as follows:
I. Intake and Introduction
II. Residential Program and Treatment Process
III. Re-Entry. Pre-Outpatient Treatment Process
IV. Outpatient Rehab. Process and Follow-up
Following is further information on each of the phases of the pro-
gram:
I. PHASE I - INTAKE AND INTRODUCTION
The individual who is bound by drug addiction and wants to enter
the program is initially interviewed by the Director of the Victory
Outreach Rehabilitation Home. The purpose of the interview is to de-
termine if there is a sincere desire to stop using drugs and willing-
ness to become fully involved in the program. Many individuals come
with the sole motive of breaking their physical habits and do not
want to participate in or finish the program. Our desire is to see an
individual fully benefit from all the aspects offered by our program.
Upon acceptance into the program. the resident is assigned a bed. in-
formed of the house l:u1es. and made aware of the schedule and expect-
ations of daily program participation.
Special provisions are made for residents in the process of detox-
ification. Detoxification usua111y lasts three to four days. After
this period. the resident is assigned to a counselor and a Personal
History form is completed. The resident's criminal record and (pend-
ing/future) court appearances are noted on the record of future refer-
ence.
II. PHASE II - RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL
A. RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM
The counselor meets with the Director on a weekly basis to
give him an (oral/overview) review of the resident's status. The re-
view consists of an assessment of the resident's progress and sit-
uation in the following areas:
15''/~
1. Resident's Attitude
Attitude toward authority: personal hygiene: punc-
tuality: sincerity: emotional stability: dependability: coopel:-
ation: and interest in the spiritual aspect of the program.
2. Resident's FamilY
The counselor contacts the resident's family and
attempts to get them involved in the program. The counselor ex-
plains the program functions and our methods for dealing with drug
addiction. The family is also prepared for participation in needed
sUPPOl:ti ve services such as Marital Counselling, Parenting pl:oblems
and/or Financial Planning.
3. Attitude of Resident's Spouse
Often the spouse of. an addict is not interested in the
program because of the resident's past failed attempts to stop
using drugs. As a result, numel:OUS personal contacts al:e re.qui red
by the counselor to develop a sense of trust, confidence and new'
hope for changes within the resident.
Con tacts are generally also made and continuously
nourished by the mature Christian men leaders in the church. Many
of our women leaders have come from similar backgrounds enabling
them to be more understanding and appropriately speak to the needs
of the women residents.
B, TREATMENT PROTOCOL
The goal of the Victory Outreach Rehabilitation Home is to
carefully mold an addict into a responsible, productive individual
with a sense of values and self-respect so that he/she is capable
of living a resourceful, happy life with her family and within his/
her community.
Victory Outreach's unique, spirit-filled Discipleship Pro-
gram assists each person on an individual basis to re-establish
sensible values and obtainable morals to re-direct and guide his/her
life in a positive direction.
The Victory Outreach Discipleship Program specifically focuses on
four areas, as follows:
1. Thel:apeutic Counsellinq
a) The counselor advises and orients the resident to-
ward correcting the instability in hi~/her life.
b) The resident learns how to satisfy his/her essential
(spiritual) needs by: researching available resources and using
our information bank.
I>'tl
c) Through counselling. the resident is enlightened
and assisted in realizing his/her proper and natural place in life.
2. Natural Career Development
Through family counselling and career orientation each
resident learns to acknowledge his/herself as a complex person. how
to handle the responsibility of his/her various roles in relation
to his/her spouse, family and to pr.ovide for their livelihood.
3. Character Buildinq
The resident learns how to overcome his/her feaJ:s, com-
plexes and deficiencies and regain strength and confidence by a
chaJ:acter rebuilding process which includes:
a) Learning his/her proper and natural place of order
in his/her family as the protector and provider of love for his/her
family and/or spouse.
Clients are also taught the wisdom of seeking assis-
tance in such matters as Marriage and Family Christian Counselling.
Community Health. Financial Planning and Effective Christian Child
Real:ing.
III. PHASE THREE - RE-ENTRY. PRE-OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION PROCESS
The counselor is responsible for assessing the resident's
skills or lack of. and for developing an appropriate program. The
resident must either work or attend school.
In this phase. the resident continues to be assigned to a
counselor and must comply with the rules of the Home. However. the
resident may ocasionally stay overnight with his/her family.
The following services are offered in the Re-entry Process:
*** Sheltered Living Situation
*** Individual and Group Counselling
*** vocational Counselling
IV. PHASE FOUR - OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION PROCESS AND FOLLOH UP
Once the resident moves out of the Home and is r.eunited with
his/her family and is established in the community, a follow-up
team visits on a weekly basis to encourage the family's active part-
icipation in the church and continuous fellowship with other positive
thinking, productive and mature Christians.
-3-
/5",2.t)
"
These visits are reduced to once a week and then once every
two weeks and after careful observation, to once a month until the
Team feels confident that the individual is productively involved
with his/hel: family and work environment.
Victory Outreach conducts recreational and socializing functions for
church members, residents and their families primarily for the pur-
pose of teaching and re-educating them on how to have fun and enjoy
life without the need to drink or take drugs, A calendar of events
is prepared and everyone is encouraged to participate in the act-
ivities to develop a spirit of team work, cooperativeness and col-
laboration.
-4- 15'3/
PCC-92-34
Attachmentccn;"
VICTORY OUTREACH DAILY SCHEDULE
5:30 am
6:00-7:00 am
1:00-8:00 am
8:00-B:30 am
9:00-3:00 pm
3:00-5:00 pm
WAKE UP
PRAYER
BIBLE STUDIES
BREAKFAST
WORK
SHOWERS & DINNER
6:30-
1:00 pm
PRAYER & CHURCH
BIBLE STUDY
8:00 pm-
10:00 pm-
GET READY FOR TIlE NEXT DAY & GET READY FOR BED
L!I],HTS OFF
/5~.2J.
PCC-92-34
PAGE 1
citation
9 CA ADC s 10564
9 CCR s 10564
Cal. Admin. Code
Attachment "E"
Rank(R)
R 1 OF 1
Database
CA-ADC
Mode
P
tit. 9, s 10564
BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS
Title 9. Rehabilitative And Developmental Services
Division 4. Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs
Chapter 5. Licensing Requirements for Alcoholism or Drug Abuse Recovery or
Treatment Facilities
Article 6. Continuing Requirements
s 10564. Personnel Requirements.
(a) Facility administrator qualifications
(1) The facility administrator shall demonstrate abilities and competency in
the following areas:
(A) Knowledge of the requirements for providing the type of alcoholism or
drug abuse recovery or treatment services needed by residents.
(B) Knowledge of and ability to comply with applicable law and regulations.
(C) Ability to direct the work of others, when applicable.
(D) Ability to develop and manage the facility's alcohol or drug abuse
recovery or treatment services and budget.
(E) Ability to recruit, employ, train, and evaluate qualified staff, and to
terminate employment of staff, if applicable to the facility.
(2) Each licensee shall make provision for continuing operation and
administration during any absence of the regular administrative personnel.
(3) The licensee, if an individual, or any member of the governing board of
the licensed corporation or association, shall be permitted to be the facility
administrator provided that he/she meets the qualifications specified in this
section, and in applicable regulations.
(b) Staff Qualifications
(1) Facility personnel including volunteers shall be competent to provide the
services necessary to meet resident needs and shall be adequate in numbers
necessary to meet such needs. Competence shall be demonstrated by accrued
work, personal, and/or educational experience and/or on-the-job performance.
(2) The department shall have the authority to require any licensee to
provide additional staff whenever the department determines and documents that
existing staff is unable to provide services as described in the plan of
operation submitted to the department. The licensee shall be informed in
writing of the reasons for the department's determination. The following
factors shall be taken into consideration in determining the need for
additional staff:
(A) Needs of the particular residents;
(B) Extent of the services provided by the facility; and
(C) Physical arrangements of the particular facility.
(3) All personnel shall be trained or shall have experience which provides
knowledge of the skills required in the following areas, as appropriate to the
job assigned, and as evidenced by safe and effective job performance:
(A) General knowledge of alcohol and/or drug abuse and alcoholism and the
principles of recovery.
/5- .23
9 CA ADC s 10564
PAGE
2
(B) Housekeeping and sanitation principles.
(e) Principles of communicable disease prevention and control.
(D) Recognition of early signs of illness and the need for professional
assistance.
(E) Availability of community services and resources.
(F) Recognition of individuals under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs.
(G) Principles and nutrition, food preparation and storage, and menu
planning.
(c) All personnel shall be in good health.
(1) Except as specified in (3) below, good physical health shall be verified
by a health screening, including a test for tuberculosis, performed under
licensed medical supervision not more than sixty (60) days prior to or seven
(7) days after employment with tuberculosis testing renewable every year.
(A) Personnel with a known record of tuberculosis or record of positive
testing shall not be required to be retested if a physician verifies the
individual has been under regular care and monitoring for tuberculosis. Such
verification will be renewed annually.
(2) A health screening report signed by the person performing such screening
shall be made for each person specified above, and shall indicate the
following:
(A) The person's physical qualifications to perform assigned duties.
(B) The presence of any health condition that would create a hazard to the
person, residents or other staff members.
(3) The good physical health of each volunteer who works in the facility
shall be verified by a statement signed by each volunteer affirming that
he/she is in good health, and a test for tuberculosis performed not more than
sixty (60) days prior to or seven (7) days after initial presence in the
facility and annually thereafter. At the discretion of the licensee,
tuberculosis testing need not be required for volunteers whose functions do
not necessitate frequent or prolonged contact with residents.
(A) Volunteers with a known record of tuberculosis or record of positive
testing shall not be required to be retested if a physician verifies the
individual has been under regular care and monitoring for tuberculosis. Such
verification will be renewed annually.
(d) Personnel with evidence of physical illness that poses a threat to the
health and safety of residents shall be temporarily relieved of their duties.
(e) Residents shall not be used as substitutes for required staff but shall
be permitted to participate in duties and tasks as a voluntary part of their
program of activities.
(f) When regular staff members are absent, there shall be coverage by
personnel capable of performing assigned tasks as evidenced by on-the-job
performance, experience or training. Residents shall not be utilized to
fulfill this requirement.
(g) Personnel shall provide services without physical or verbal abuse,
exploitation or prejudice.
(h) All personnel shall be instructed to report observation or evidence of
violations of personal rights as specified in section 10569 of this
subchapter.
(i) The licensee shall develop, maintain, and implement an ongoing training
program for all staff in the areas identified in section 10564 (b) (3) of this
15--.2 i
9 CA ADC s 10564
PAGE
3
subchapter in addition to specific training related to their duties. staff
participation in the training program shall be documented and maintained on
file for three (3) years.
Note: Authority cited: section 11834.13, Health and Safety Code. Reference:
sections 11834.10, 11834.14(c), (d), and 11834.19, Health and Safety Code.
History
1. New section filed 2-7-85 as an emergency; operative 2-7-85 (Register 85, No.
8) .
2. Repealed by operation of law 2-1-86. Readoption of section filed 1-24-86 as
an emergency; operative 2-1-86 (Register 86, No.4).
3. Repealed by operation of law 6-2-86. Readoption of section filed 5-30-86 as
an emergency; operative 6-1-86 (Register 86, No. 22).
4. Repealed by operation of law 9-29-86. Readoption of section filed 9-26-86 as
an emergency; operative 9-29-86 (Register 86, No. 39). A certificate of
Compliance must be transmitted to OAL no later than 1-27-87 or section will be
repealed by operation of law (Government Code section 11346.1(g)).
5. Readoption of section filed 1-26-87 as an emergency; operative 1-27-87
(Register 87, No.5). A certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL no
later than 5-26-87 or section will be repealed by operation of law (Government
Code section 11346.1(g)).
6. Readoption of section filed 5-26-87 as an emergency; operative 5-26-87
(Register 87, No. 22). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL
no later than 9-23-87 or section will be repealed by operation of law
(Government Code section 11346.1(g)).
7. Repealer and new section transmitted to OAL 9-23-87 and filed 10-23-87;
operative 10-23-87 (Register 87, No. 43).
8. Amendment of subsections (a) and (b) filed 12-27-89 as an emergency;
operative 1-1-90 (Register 90, NO.1). A certificate of Compliance must be
transmitted to OAL within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed by
operation of law on 5-1-90.
9. Amendment of subsections (a) and (b) refiled 4-30-90 as an emergency;
operative 4-30-90 (Register 90, No. 22). A certificate of Compliance must be
transmitted to OAL within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed by
operation of law on 8-28-90.
10. certificate of Compliance as to 4-30-90 order including amendment of NOTE
transmitted to OAL 8-27-90 and filed 9-26-90 (Register 90, No. 44).
9 CA ADC s 10564
END OF DOCUMENT
/5'.2~
~h
lit
"':.t~!E!WU
MAA'~;(;i~gOJECT
A MULTI-PURPOSfSOCIi\L SERVICE AGENCY
. . . .
""d?L:;,\;",,j'<;:'22<LiM'''ttf:C;;(:r,T3
NOSOTROS
3 North Second Ave., Bldg. B, Chula Vista, CA 91910 (619) 426-4801
March 3, 1992
steve Griffin, Senior Planner
Chula Vista Planning Commission
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mr. Griffin:
It is our understanding that Victory Outreach is in the process
of applying for a Conditional Use Permit. At their request
we are writing to you to confirm that, in the event their permit
is issued, Nosotros would be willing to share six (6) parking
spaces on the property we are currently leasing.
Please feel free to contact us at anytime regarding this or
any other matter. Thank you.
S' 1 /' /
J.ncere y, / .>"~ /.
/ '5,<'{;/ '. /
_ .' .:Z-i//C:;"C7:?;~.:6:'-:/
Warren Garcia Stewart
Program Manager
NOSOTROS
~IGS: mrr
/5'~1R
~-
{/toto!"? ()u.t!"MJ.eh-
CHURCH
590 Fir Street
San Diego, CA.
92\ 01
(61912370373
Victory Outreach San Diego is a part of a Christian
organization established for over 25 years with churches all
over the United States and many foreign countries. I have
personally been involved with this ministry for 17 years.
During this time, we have applied for countless conditional
use permits and because of this experience we are aware of
the many relevant concerns of the community residents when a
drug and alcohol program moves into a neighborhood. Because
Victory Outreach is a Christian church that meets a community
need with a drug program and not just a drug program that
attends a church. We have designed our program to eliminate
some of these community concerns.
First of all, the director of the facility is account-
able to our church staff and not to some out of town agency,
buracracy or committee. We are therefore available to res-
pond to concerns or problems immediately and there is no need
to wait for days to receive a response. This is a church
controlled program and we are concerned with our relationship
with our community.
You may have some preconceived ideas about our program be-
cause our program receives court referrals. We are a church
recognized by the courts as an alternative to sentencing, not
a correctional facility. We are under no obligation to
accept any potentially dangerous resident into our program.
Our program is so integrated with our church activities that
we will not endanger our church families or children with sex
offenders, persons with mental disorders and persons with un-
usually violent behavior.
Another community concern is traffic in the neighbor-
hood. To eliminate unnecessary traffic, we do not conduct
out-patient counselling at the site. Referrals and prequali-
fications are done at our downtown church location at 6th and
Fir Streets. Residents are not allowed to bring privately
owned vehicles to the facility. Staff vehicles used during
the day are approximately 7 or 8 and we have 7 to 10 church
vehicles used for transporting residents for a maximum of 15
to 20 vehicles at any given time.
Pastor J/
Tony and Nellie J..r..:;; ,.,;.?
Guzman
We are aware that residents are also concerned with
vagrancy problems. We are structured to provide 24-hour
supervision of residents and the residents' schedule is an
intensive one which begins at 5:30 a.m. and we have "lights
out" at 10:00 a.m. Residents are not permitted to leave the
facility and wander the grounds unsupervised. When a resid-
ent is terminated from our program, he will be escorted to
the city bus terminal or trolley station by program staff.
Because this is a church program the rules include no smoking
no drugs or alcohol, no loud parties and a dress code is
strictly adhered to at all times.
Lastly, victory Outreach knows that any caring community
is concerned with the integrity of the program coming into
their neighborhood. We have been recognized from the state
White House to the Federal White House for the last 25 years
and we are prepared to provide you with a list of supporters.
Victory Outreach is willing to sit down with anyone who is
good faith would like to go over our credentials . We are
open to anyone to come and che~ out our present
facilities, beginning with our church at 590 Fir street
across from Balboa Park, as well as our rehabilitation
facilities. We will provide aw tour to interested persons of
our rehabilitation faci1itie4s by contacting me or my
rehabilitation overseer, Tomas Rodrique~, at 2~0373.
Victory Outreach will make effort to make our program an
asset to the city Of Chula vista as we also desire to be a
complement to the efforts of the community as it addresses
its concerns in the areas of gangs, drugs and alcoholism.
Respectfully submitted
Tony Guzman, Pastor
Victory Outreach Church
15"',).~
Victory Outreach Church
Nut to B.lboa Pori, O..rlookio, Beouliful DOlDololDO
SAN DIEGO
WHO IS VICTORY OUTREACH
Victory Outreach began in Los Angeles over twenty-five years
ago. lie now cover fourteen states and six countries. He ~1Ork
mainly with drug addicts, alcoholics, gang members and those
with criminal backgrounds.
At the present time, Victory Outreach San Diego is accountable
for four (4) drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities th:ough-
out San Diego for men and women, these are 24 hour, live-
in fully supervised facilities. The duration of the program is
from 9 to 12 months depending on individual growth. The part-
icipanL's physical, emotional and spiritual needs are met and
thoy are then reintegrated into society with new values plus a
more positive life~tyle.
PURPOSE
The philosophy of Victory Outreach is three-fold: (1) to
J:eOlch the d1:U9 addict; (2) to train them; (3) then to ser.d them
tack to l:e~ch someone else.
It is critical that a drug addict be separated from his world
and get nurtured in a positive enviJ:onment. That is ,-,hy ~:e have
rehabilitation homes that are staffed 24-hours per day and are
structured in a christian home manner. The addict learns to pray,
study the bible, learn and apply Christian principalS to his
life. During this time he begins to devolope a church lifestyle.
Our church is structured as a support and follow-up group. The
"New Christian . is then integrated through the church back again
into society with a lifestyle totally sepaJ~ated fJ:om his past.
~e are now developing a new scpport gro~p called the Love Circle
590 Fir Street. San Diego, CA 92101 1.5-:1 7
for those that don't need residential treatment and for grad-
uates during their adjustment period.
LICENSING
The licensing reqirements, for our type of program, .fall'under
the State of California, Department of Alcohol and Drug Program.
The analyst assigned to our program is Ronald I. Bevers, assigned
from the Licensing and Certification Branch.
We have previously applied for state licensing at our previous
location but because of zoning requirements we have had to re-
locate. As soon as we receive our Conditional Use Permit for this
facility, we will begin once again to submit appropiate documents
to the Department of Drug and Alcohol for processing.
RULES AND REGULATIONS
A Copy of our rules are attached for your review.
RESIDENTS
This facility will be able to provide bed space for 60 pel:sons.
These potential residents corne as referrals from parole and pro-
bation officers, court commitments, in as much as the courts re-
cognize Victory Outreach as an appropriate alternative to incar-
ceration. Referrals also come from other churches and community
service organizations and potential residents come from personal
contact made by our evangelistic efforts in the community.
Our program is designed to meet the residents' needs physically.
emotionally and spirituallY. We feel the resident is able to reinte-
grate into society with new values and a more positive life-style
in 9 to 12 months. We currently have a 45% success rate, consequentl~
we are meeting an ever increasing need in San Diego.
Residents have an intense schedule consisting of early morning
wake-up, chapel time and daily bible studies twice per day. house-
hold chores, personal study and outside activities.
I~~(J
STAFF
This facility will be supel:vised by -1.!L. staff members.
This facility has four (4) wings-which bouse 15 resident's each.
Each wing has its own office and a Wing Supervisor, Head Staff,
and two othel: staff members supervising the residents. The night
shift consists of four (4) Night Wing Managers, one (1) manager
per wing and one night security.
REHAB STAFF
The staff turns in weekly rosters of residents, prepares pro-
gress reports and keeps current files on each resident. They also
monitor and supervise residents' daily activities, transport
residents to medical and legal appointments and recreational act-
ivities. Counselling on a one to one basis. leading group sessions
with residents, also meeting once a week with other staff members
and wing supervisors to discuss residents' progress.
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
Administrative Staff consists of Executive Director, Director,
Program Administrater, Secretal:y 1, Secretary 2, Pl:ogram Coordinator.
This staff is available during regular business hours.
REHAB FINANCES
Victory Outreach is a_non-profit organization who is solely
dependent on donations and financial assistance from Victory Out-
reach Church for its support. Residents apply for General Relief
Assistance, if eligible to offset the cost of their room and board
expenses.
15'''3 I
F\.EASE AEPl.YTO:
[J SACRAMENTO OI'FICE
COMMITTEES
STATE CAPITOl.. ROOM 3048
SACRAMENTO. CA aSS1.
la161..S.6767
MELEN ..oNES
ADMINISTIUT!VI: ASMTANT
QtaUfnmin &tate ~ennte
BANKING. COMMERCE. AND
INTERNATION....I.. TRADE. CHAIRMAN
EOUCATION
MEAl.. TH ....ND HUMAN SERVICES
VETERANS AFFAIRS
JOINT COMMITTEE ON
LEGISL.ATIVE RETIREMENT
Pl.EA5E REA. Y TO'
o DISTRICT OFFICE
SELECT COMMITTEE ON
PACIFIC RIM
430 DAVIDSON STREET
SUITE C
o-fULA VISTA. CA VIVtO
1618'.27.7080
BAR8AR.... HUNSAKER
ADMINlSTfU,TMi: USlSTANT
STATE SENATOR
WADlE P. DEDDEH
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON
BORDER ISSUES
I'ORTlETH SENATORIAL DISTRICT
F?~c~/,V~o
!y.'~ !
CHAIRMAN
SENATE COMMITTEE ON BANKING. COMMERCE, AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE
May 4, 1992
1,(/9,'
PL/'/NN1NG
Chula vista Planning Commission
ATT:Martin Miller
276 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
I would like to take this opportunity to endorse Victory
Outreach Church's application to obtain a conditional use
permit to provide drug and alcohol recovery services at 3
North Second Avenue in Chula Vista.
Victory Outreach has been involved in drug and alcohol related
services for almost three decades. During this time Victory
outreach Church, through it's superior supervision and
staff, has a proven track record of effectively integrating
rehabilitation services with the surrounding neighborhood, so,
the make-up of the neighborhood is not disturbed or changed.
This agency has consistently demonstrated its ability to be
sensitive to the needs of its clients as well as the
community.
Finally, it is of great importance that the community of Chula
Vista have access to the special services that Victory
Outreach Church has to offer. So once again, I would strongly
urge the Planning Commission to grant Victory Outreach their
request for a conditional use permit, for it has clearly
demonstrated a unique ability to provide meaningful services
to a population that all too often does not receive the kind
of attention that is required.
Si~ncerel: ' 0i:.
/t,~{~ f!~~
/ WADlE P. DEDDEH
/.5" ;;..
_.
RESOLUTION NO. 16650
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY
COUNCIL GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
OPERATE A DRUG AND ALCOHOL REHABILITATION AND
RECOVERY HOME AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE IN THE
R-3 ZONING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional
use permit was filed with the Planning Department of the City of
Chula vista on March 10, 1992 by Victory outreach; and
WHEREAS, said application requested a conditional use
permit to allow a drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery home
to be located at 3 North Second Avenue in the R-3 zoning District;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
May 13, 1992 and recommended that Council grant said conditional
use permit; and
WHEREAS, the City Council set the time and place for a
hearing on said conditional use permit application and notice of
said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and
its mailing to property owners within an area greater than 1,000
feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days
prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as
advertised, namely 4:00 p.m., June 2,1992 in the Council Chambers,
276 Fourth Avenue, before the city Council and said hearing was
thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the city Council found that the project would
have no significant environmental impacts and adopted the Negative
Declaration issued on IS-92-30.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
finds as follows:
1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or
desirable to provide a service or facility which will
contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or
the community.
The conditional approval of PCC-92-34 at the proposed location
is necessary and desirable in order to provide a service which
will contribute to the general well being of the community in
that there is an existing, under-utilized facility in place,
and the service to be provided by victory Outreach will
1
J-S - 33
contribute to the community by assisting in the rehabilitation
of drug and alcohol users.
2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the
particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or
general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity
or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity.
The conditional approval of PCC-92-34 will not, under the
circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the
health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the project vicinity or injurious to property or
improvements in the project vicinity in that, as a condition
of approval, there will be 24 hour security at the facility to
ensure that the residents do not leave the compound without
authorization, and in that potential residents are screened by
victory Outreach who will not admit people with violent,
psychotic or deviant personal histories or persons with severe
medical conditions, including AIDS. Victory Outreach has also
assured the City that activities are organized and conducted
in a manner which will not adversely impact the residential
enjoyment of surrounding neighbors.
3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and
conditions specified in the Municipal Code for such use.
The conditional approval of PCC-92-34 complies with the
regulations and conditions of the Municipal Code in that the
project is conditioned to comply with the requirements of all
applicable City departments and will not generate excessive
traffic nor require extra on-site parking.
4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan of the City or the adopted
plan of any government agency.
The granting of PCC-92-34 will not adversely affect the
General Plan in that the designation of the property allows
for drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery facilities
upon the approval of a conditional use permit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby
adopts this resolution granting the conditional use permit, subject
to the following conditions:
1. The application for a drug and alcohol rehabilitation and
recovery center for a maximum of 60 male adults is
conditionally approved for a one year period from the date of
final approval. Prior to the expiration of one year, the
applicant shall submit the appropriate application form and
fee in adequate time for hearing on the extension request to
be heard before the city Council.
2
/S-3'-f
2. The "Rules-Men's Home" (Attachment "A") are hereby
incorporated with the exception of Item No. 15 which shall be
restated as:
"All residents of the facility shall be under 24 hour
supervision, both on- and off-site. If a resident leaves
the site without authorization and unattended, deserts
while on any field trip, or breaks any rule, he shall be
expelled from the program. Residents that complete the
program, desire to leave. or are released or expelled
shall either be transported to their primary place of
residence or to the Victory Outreach Church at 590 Fir
street in downtown San Diego for discharge at that
location' "and
....-
IR aaaitisR, Item No. 14 which shall be restated as:
"Any resident terminated for any reason will not be
permitted to re-enter the home in Chula vista for thirty
(30) days."
The management of the program shall ensure the rules are
complied with.
FailliFc te eSll\191y \w.i 'Eft t.he coruii tiSRE1 af appro9,;al, 'the
ItRbtlec nen's Heme" or aRY atacF ouppertil\EjJ material lB.::lY
CBRotit\:ltc grouflac fer rC9,;icu a:Fui poooiblc re~:eeation of
tRic permit.
3. Any substantiated conflicts with or complaints from the
surrounding neighborhood may be cause for review and possible
revocation of the permit prior to the expiration of the one
year trial period.
4. with the exception of the Nosotros program, only this
residential live-in program and those activities associated
therewith and noted in the application and supplemental
materials, including numbers of residents, staff, programs,
supervision aRa as SR, shall occur on the property. Any other
activities, such as fund raising or any other special or on-
going activities shall not be permitted without reeeiye prior
approval from the City.
5. Residents shall not be allowed to loiter or congregate outside
areas on the easterly and northeasterly portions of the site
and complex.
6. The "proposed fence" shall be deleted from the site plan.
7. The pole barricade in the drive next to the ground level,
enclosed patio off of the south wing shall be removed so as to
3
/..$-35'
ensure access by emergency response personnel and other
vehicular traffic.
8. At no time shall any driveway or driving lane be chained or
barricaded so as to impede circulation by motor vehicles.
9. The northern driveway shall be used only for ingress. The
southern driveway can be used for ingress and egress, but all
exiting traffic shall be from this driveway. Each driveway
shall be appropriately posted and marked with stop signs, no
exit signs, etc., to indicate the direction of travel and the
required movements, to the satisfaction of the Traffic
Engineer.
10.
All other parking spaces shall
exist. All striping shall
Standards.
be restriped as they currently
be in accordance with City
11. Any proposed architectural changes or changes to the basic
color scheme of the buildings shall be approved by the
Director of Planning, and permits for structural modifications
shall be obtained from the Building Department prior to
commencement. Failure to properly maintain the buildings or
grounds may be grounds for review and possible revocation of
this permit.
12. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall:
a. Obtain licensing from the California state Alcohol and
Drug Program.
b. Comply with all requirements of the Chula vista Fire
Department.
c. Comply with all requirements of the Chula vista Building
Department.
13. Loss of state of California licensing shall result in
automatic revocation of the conditional use permit.
14. This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified, or
deleted conditions imposed after adoption of this resolution
to advance a legitimate governmental interest related to
health, safety or welfare which City shall impose after
advance written notice to the permittee and after the city has
given to the permittee the right to be heard with regard
thereto. However, the City, in exercising this reserved
right/condition, may not impose a substantial expense or
deprive Permittee of a substantial revenue source which the
Permittee can not, in the normal operation of the use
permitted, be expected to economically recover.
4
1~-..3G,
15. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective
if not utilized within one year from the effective date
thereof, in accordance with section 19.14.260 of the Municipal
Code. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall
cause this permit to be reviewed by the City for additional
conditions or revocation.
16. Where possible, applicants to the program who are residents of
Chula vista shall be given priority.
17. This conditional use permit shall be subiect to revocation.
modification. or fine in lieu of revocation. upon a
determination bv the issuina authori tv. to-wi t: the ci tv
Council. that the permittee or their successors in interest
have used the subiect premises in excess of the authority
herein aranted or that the terms and conditions of this permit
have in any way been violated. reaardless of cause. or that
the continued use of this permit is iniurious to the health.
safety or welfare of the community.
Presented by
Approved as
form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boog
City Attorney
f3- (~
C:\rs\victory
5
IJ~37 /15..51.-
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-92-34
A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL GRANT A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A DRUG
AND ALCOHOL REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY HOME AT
3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE IN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use
permit was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula
Vista on March 10, 1992 by Victory Outreach; and
WHEREAS, said application requested a conditional use permit
to allow a drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery home to be
located at 3 North Second Avenue in the R-3 Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a
hearing on said conditional use permit application and notice of
said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and
its mailing to property owners within an area greater than 1,000
feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days
prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as
advertised, namely 7:00 p.m., May 13, 1992 in the Council Chambers,
276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning commission and said hearing
was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the Commission found that the project would have no
significant environmental impacts and recommended adoption the
Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-30.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
finds as follows:
1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or
desirable to provide a service or facility which will
contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or
the community.
The conditional approval of PCC-92-34 at the proposed location
is necessary and desirable in order to provide a service which
will contribute to the general well being of the community in
that there is an existing, under-utilized facility in place,
and the service to be provided by Victory Outreach will
contribute to the community by assisting in the rehabilitation
of drug and alcohol users.
2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the
particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or
,--' 1
j'"I:<;
./' ../ /
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-92-34
MAY 13, 1992
PAGE 2
general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity
or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity.
The conditional approval of PCC-92-34 will not, under the
circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the
health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the project vicinity or injurious to property or
improvements in the project vicinity in that, as a condition
of approval, there will be 24 hour security at the facility to
ensure that the residents do not leave the compound without
authorization, and in that potential residents are screened by
Victory Outreach who will not admit people with violent,
psychotic or deviant personal histories or persons with severe
medical conditions, including AIDS. victory Outreach has also
assured the city that activities are organized and conducted
in a manner which will not adversely impact the residential
enjoyment of surrounding neighbors.
3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and
conditions specified in the Municipal Code for such use.
The conditional approval of PCC-92-34 complies with the
regulations and conditions of the Municipal Code in that the
project is conditioned to comply with the requirements of all
applicable city departments and will not generate excessive
traffic nor require extra on-site parking.
4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan of the city or the adopted
plan of any government agency.
The granting of PCC-92-34 will not adversely affect the
General Plan in that the designation of the property allows
for drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery facilities
upon the approval of a conditional use permit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the City Council adopt a resolution granting the conditional
use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1. The application for a drug and alcohol rehabilitation and
recovery center for a maximum of 60 male adults is
conditionally approved for a one year period from the date of
final approval. Prior to the expiration of one year, the
applicant shall submit the appropriate application form and
fee in adequate time for hearing on the extension request to
be heard before the City Council.
2. The "Rules-Men's Home". (Attachment "A") are hereby
incorporated. The management of the program shall ensure the
J';;-; Y (/
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-92-34
MAY 13, 1992
PAGE 3
rules are complied with, with the exception of Item No. 15
which shall be restated as:
"All residents of the facility shall be under 24 hour
supervision, both on- and off-site. If a resident leaves
the site without authorization and unattended, deserts
while on any field trip, or breaks any rule, he shall be
expelled from the program. Residents that complete the
program, or are released or expelled shall either be
transported to their primary place of residence or to the
victory Outreach Church at 590 Fir Street in downtown San
Diego for discharge at that location."
In addition, Item No. 14 shall be restated as:
"Any resident terminated for any reason will not be
permitted to re-enter the home in Chula vista for thirty
(30) days."
Failure to comply with the conditions of approval, the "Rules-
Men's Home" or any other supporting material may constitute
grounds for review and possible revocation of this permit.
3. Any substantiated conflicts with or complaints from the
surrounding neighborhood may be cause for review and possible
revocation of the permit prior to the expiration of the one
year trial period.
4. with the exception of the Nosotros program, only this
residential live-in program and those activities associated
therewith and noted in the application and supplemental
materials, including numbers of residents, staff, programs,
supervision and so on, shall occur on the property. Any other
activities, such as fund raising or any other special or on-
going activities shall receive prior approval from the City.
5. Residents shall not be allowed to loiter or congregate outside
designated areas. outside activities shall be restricted to
the designated outside areas on the easterly and northeasterly
portions of the site and complex.
6. The "proposed fence" shall be deleted from the site plan.
7. The pole barricade in the drive next to the ground level,
enclosed patio off of the south wing shall be removed so as to
ensure access by emergency response personnel and other
vehicular traffic.
8. At no time shall any driveway or driving lane be chained or
barricaded so as to impede circulation by motor vehicles.
/~-i/
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-92-34
MAY 13, 1992
PAGE 4
9. The northern driveway shall be used only for ingress. The
southern driveway can be used for ingress and egress, but all
exiting shall be from this driveway. Each driveway shall be
appropriately posted and marked with stop signs, no exit
signs, etc., to indicate the direction of travel and the
required movements, to the satisfaction of the Traffic
Engineer.
10.
All other parking spaces shall
exist. All striping shall
Standards.
be restriped as they currently
be in accordance with City
11. Any proposed architectural changes or changes to the basic
color scheme of the buildings shall be approved by the
Director of Planning, and permits for structural modifications
shall be obtained from the Building Department prior to
commencement. Failure to properly maintain the buildings or
grounds may be grounds for review and possible revocation of
this permit.
12. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall:
a. Obtain licensing from the California State Alcohol and
Drug Program.
b. Comply with all requirements of the Chula vista Fire
Department.
c. Comply with all requirements of the Chula vista Building
Department.
13. Loss of State of California licensing shall result in
automatic revocation of the conditional use permit.
14. This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified, or
deleted conditions imposed after adoption of this resolution
to advance a legitimate governmental interest related to
health, safety or welfare which City shall impose after
advance written notice to the permittee and after the City has
given to the permittee the right to be heard with regard
thereto. However, the City, in exercising this reserved
right/condition, may not impose a substantial expense or
deprive Permittee of a substantial revenue source which the
Permittee can not, in the normal operation of the use
permitted, be expected to economically recover.
15. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective
if not utilized within one year from the effective date
thereof, in accordance with section 19.14.260 of the Municipal
Code. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall
/~ '-/:L
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-92-34
MAY 13, 1992
cause this permit to be reviewed by the City for additional
conditions or revocation.
PAGE 5
16. Where possible, applicants to the program who are residents of
Chula vista shall be given priority.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant
and the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 13th day of May, 1992 by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES:
commissioners casillas, Fuller, Martin, Decker and
Tuchscher
NOES:
Commissioners Carson and Tugenberg
ABSENT:
None
Susan Fuller, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
/<- </3
~"?~\,
PC Minutes
DRAFT EXCERPT FROM MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
lJ1(4;:-1
ITEM 2:
May 13, 1992
PUBLIC HEARING - PCC-92-34; REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW A 60-BED DRUG AND ALCOHOL
REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY CENTER AT 3 NORTII SECOND
A VENUE - Victory Outreach
-4-
Associate Planner Miller presented the staff report and recommended that the Planning
Commission recommend approval to the City Council for an initial one-year period, subject to
an extension by Council upon a finding that the facility has functioned as stated by Victory
Outreach in meetings and in their literature, and as conditioned in the staff report. Staff also
recommended that the Planning Commission find that this project has no significant
environmental impact and recommend adoption to Council of the Negative Declaration issued
on 15-92-30, and that based on findings contained in Section E of the staff report, adopt a
motion recommending approval to the City Council of PCC-92-34, subject to the conditions
outlined in the staff report.
Commissioner Carson asked, out of the 80% of the residents from the County, what percent
would be from Chula Vista, and if a priority would be given to Chula Vista residents. Mr.
Martin answered that it had not been computed. A condition could be included by the Planning
Commission which would give priority to Chula Vista residents.
Commissioner Carson asked if there was a nationality ratio that would be expected to be fulfilled
by the agency. Mr. Miller answered negatively and did not have any figures as to current ratio.
Answering Commissioner Carson's query, Mr. Miller stated that all counselling would take
place off-site, and that visiting by family or friends on-site was discouraged except in special
circumstances. Staff had no objection to the Planning Commission including a condition that
visitors would not be allowed on the facility.
Commissioner Carson questioned whether the existing Pioneer facility was at full capacity. Staff
had no information.
In reply to Commissioner Carson, Associate Planner Miller said that the benefits received by
the City were more social in that residents of Chula Vista who go into the program would not
only recover from their alcohol and drug abuse problems but also would be able to be
reintegrated into society and be a contributing member of society.
Commissioner Carson asked if this would solve the homeless problem, noting that many of the
homeless had the same problem. Mr. Miller answered negatively.
Commissioner Casillas emphasized the uniqueness of the program and the benefit to the City of
having rehabilitated, productive people back into the community.
/< ,LILI
PC Minutes
-5-
May 13, 1992
Commissioner Tugenberg asked, of the 144 petitions which came from the City of Chu1a Vista,
how many came from addicts and alcoholics. Mr. Miller answered there was no attempt to
make a distinction between alcoholics and addicts.
Commissioner Tuchscher, referring to a memo from the Sr. Crime Analyst, questioned the crime
analysis done in a 0.2 mile radius. Captain Bourgeois, of the Chula Vista Police, stated that the
0.2 mile is generally the radius used for crime analysis. Anything beyond 0.2 mile is considered
inappropriate for that particular area. Compared to other parts of the City, the number of
crimes in that area was insignificant.
Commissioner Decker, referring to page 5 of the Negative Declaration, asked for further
comment on the noise potential of the project. Associate Planner Reid referred to Condition 3
which stated that any substantiated conflicts with or complaints from the surrounding
neighborhood would be cause for review and possible revocation of the permit.
In answer to Commissioner Decker, Senior Planner Griffin said there was no mechanism to
process the complaints, and nothing planned to notify the residents of this particular condition.
Staff could recommend that, however, to Council if the Commission desired.
Commissioner Decker commented that this project should be exempt from school fees since no
children were involved. Ms. Reid stated the City as a rule takes the recommendation of the
school districts. She could check the community care laws to determine if it would be exempt.
Assistant City Attorney Rudolf confirmed that the school fees were imposed by the school and
determine if the project was exempt.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Speakin!! in Favor:
Tony Guzman, 590 Fir Street, San Diego 92101, representing Victory Outreach Church, asked
the Commissioners to go along with the staff recommendation.
Commissioner Tugenberg said he understood there was a great need for this kind of service in
San Diego, and if there had been attempts to locate in other parts of the County.
Mr. Guzman replied that they had look at other areas, but there was a problem locating an area
large enough, wrong zoning, or the cost was prohibitive.
Commissioner Tugenberg asked if there was a possibility of giving priority to Chula Vista
residents. Mr. Guzman said there was no problem; he could guarantee a bed within 24 hours,
although it may be in a place other than Chula Vista.
In reply to Commissioner Tuchscher, Mr. Guzman said that could be added as a condition.
/5'/ L/)"
PC Minutes
-6-
May 13, 1992
J. R. Chantengco, 376 Canyon Ridge Drive, Bonita, representing Chantengco Realty, Inc.,
noted the benefits the project would have on the community and the landlord. Victory Outreach
was trying to consolidate several programs and locate them in Chula Vista. Mr. Chantengco felt
it gave Victory Outreach a better ability to provide for local residents.
Diane Messier, 12732 Castle Ct., Lakeside 92040, spoke to Victory Outreach's ability to
provide professional security. Involved in law enforcement in San Diego County, she had
opportunities to check the safety of youth involved in the gang ministry. Victory Outreach met
and exceeded the standards for security. She said the project would offer a choice to those who
would otherwise feel there was no way out.
Tomas Rodriguez, 2129 31st St., San Diego 92104, addressed the concerns of residents
regarding types of people served by the ministry. The potential residents of the ministry are
interviewed by appointment and are not drop-ins. Out-patient counselling is done at the Church
rather than at the Victory Outreach site. Mr. Rodriguez explained the process of entering the
program and took extreme caution as to the people who would take part in the program.
Commissioner Carson asked how long it took for a person to be serviced in the facility after
putting in an application.
Mr. Rodriguez said it depended on the individual and circumstances. After discussing the
program with the individual and what was expected of them, it would be a matter of days after
the individual had personal matters taken care of.
Lucille Dion, 4640 Zion Avenue, Apt. Dl, San Diego 92120, was court-committed 2-112 years
before to the home. She and her husband had been on drugs and are now rehabilitated and
working in the community and the Church.
Carlos Alaniz, 188 Calle Primera, San Ysidro 92173, stated the program had recognition from
President Bush and Nancy Reagan, and by the state and local governments. The program could
be a positive effect on the community.
Ernesto Valdibieso, 548 Palomar St., CV 91911, was a product of Victory Outreach. He said
they taught discipline and obedience. He had been on hard drugs with no direction as to where
to go, with no communication with his family. The program brings in all types of people, not
only low class, and tries to rehabilitate their recovery mentally, physically, and spiritually.
Peter Watry, 81 Second Avenue, CV 91910, said he supported the application because Pastor
Guzman had considered all of the concerns the neighbors would have and answered them all
without being prodded. He supported the application with all the conditions attached. He asked
that in Attachment A (Rules-Men's Home), #14, the word "County" be inserted.
/5~ L-/ t
PC Minutes
-7-
May 13, 1992
Tony Castro, 158 Zenith Street, CV 91911, had read about the successes of Victory Outreach
in dealing with drug rehabilitation, and had spoken with the Chief of Police in Escondido who
had highly endorsed the Victory Outreach program.
Jeff Cotta, 943 10th Street, San Diego 92101, representing the owners of the property,
supported the project, and felt they would work well with the Nosotros project which was
already on the property.
Catherine Goy, 43 Davidson St., CV 91910, lived within walking distance of the project and
felt Chula Vista could set an example by being a leader in programs such as this.
Thomas Sandoval, 2345 G Avenue, National City, urged support of the project.
Steve Perez, 1470 Second Street, CV 91911, said he was a product of the home and was now
a minister. He urged support of the project.
Joe Blackwell, 750 Kedze Avenue, Palm City, CA, spoke of the hours of preparation,
investigation, research, and interviews to show the credibility of Victory Outreach. He felt the
concerns of the residents were genuine, because of fear of the unknown. He felt the citizens
would see an immediate improvement in the community of the conditional use permit was
approved.
Elizabeth Beatty, 804 Norstad St., South San Diego, 92154, stated that not only low life people
would be in the facility. A member of her family had gotten involved with drugs; had gone to
Victory Outreach and had been changed 100%. She said it had to hit home before anyone wants
to get involved. She supported the Victory Outreach program.
Eileen Montalongo, 233 Chula Vista St., CV 91910, said there was not a safe place anymore,
and we have to help. She supported Victory Outreach and their type of program. She said it
was well supervised, and she had seen their progress.
Speakin~ Ae:ainst the Proiect:
Harriet Acton, 265 Nixon Place, CV 91910, said she is one of the closest neighbors and could
hear everything that goes on at the "reformatory" day and night. She and her neighbors would
rather see a residential care facility or convalescent home at that address. They felt what had
been proposed beat what they had, but felt they could do better. Mrs. Acton noted the other
facilities in the immediate neighborhood, and spoke of the street people coming from the flood
control channel and the industrial site in the early morning. They had concerns about their
children, home, and property values. She was concerned that the rules of Victory Outreach may
not be enforced. She requested that if the City allowed the project, that there be spot checks,
that it be a one-year conditional use permit. She requested that it be monitored closely,
judiciously, and unannounced.
) ~c;'/ f 7
PC Minutes
-8-
May 13, 1992
Ted Bell, 111 N. Second Ave., CV 91910, of KOA, concurred with Mrs. Acton and
commended staff on requesting additional conditions and asked that some of the conditions
suggested by the Commission be included. Mr. Bell said KOA had gone to 24-hour security
because crime had increased. He stated that Victory Outreach appeared to be an organization
that may be able to do the job and suggested that a report come back from Planning on a regular
basis of what the conditions were rather than on the basis of complaints.
Joseph Ghougassian, 74 Las Flores Drive, CV 91910, speaking on behalf of the residents on
the new street of Las Flores Drive, presented a petition to the Commission. He said about 80%
of the residents there were opposed to the project because of safety, welfare, wellbeing, security,
peace and enjoyment, and the economic preservation of the value of the homes in the
neighborhood. He felt the project was worthwhile, but did not feel it should be in the "back
yard" of the people on Las Flores Drive. He suggested that Victory Outreach should write a
letter to the Secretary of Housing requesting seed money to build somewhere else. He said the
Resource Conservation Commission had not reviewed the Negative Declaration, but would
review it during the next week or the week thereafter.
Commissioner Tuchscher asked if Mr. Ghougassian was satisfied with the current value of his
property. Mr. Ghougassian answered affirmatively.
Miriam Robbins, 20 Second Avenue, CV 91910, was concerned about the safety of her children
and children who attend a nearby school. She said it was not the responsibility of the northern
part of Chula Vista to take all the people in trouble. She was concerned about the security of
the residents of Victory Outreach. Ms. Robbins noted that Victory Outreach's success rate was
49%; she asked what happened to the other 51 %. She said her house had increased 10% in nine
years. She felt that was a bad investment in San Diego County. She wholeheartedly opposed
the project at that location.
Charles Bradley, 29 Second Avenue, CV 91910, was concerned about those who don't succeed
in the program, the nights 66 men would be in the neighborhood, the ratio of I to 4 supervisors
to the 66 men who had been involved in illegalities. He was concerned about the recidivist in
the community. He pledged to be a good neighbor, but asked the Commission's support in
protecting the interest of their safety and in imposing any and all restrictions that would cause
Victory or other resident to abide by the law and protect the residents of the area.
Leonard Aguillard, 138 Minot Avenue, CV 91910, felt this was not the best use for the
facility. He said it was a good program but not to be located on Vista Hill, and requested a
negative vote. He noted the other projects within four blocks of Vista Hill, and said the
residents had been before the Commission and Council regarding many other projects proposed
for the area. The property owners would not sign Mr. Aguillard's petition, because they felt
the Commissioners would not listen.
Commissioner Tugenberg noted that the mobilehome park had been brought up by Council
again, and he asked if the residents of Minot felt it was inevitable. Mr. Aguillard replied that
Lr;-, 'Ilr
PC Minutes
-9-
May 13, 1992
he felt it was. A Veterans Home had been mentioned and he supported that, but it was not
done. The residents would like to have a greenbelt.
Jorge Sanchez, 75 D Street, CV 91910, expressed his desire that the use of the land be long-
term and be considered in the context of the current community, which was unique and attracted
special people.
Leticia Bradley, 29 Second Avenue, CV 91910, said they had bought a home in Chula Vista
because they wanted to live in a better area. Now they felt they would have to move to another
place.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Decker felt Victory Outreach had a good program and were sincere in wanting
to do good work. He believed this was one of the ways to solve some of the problems of the
community, and supported the project.
Commissioner Tuchscher stated he was proud of the community, and he had a tremendous
amount of respect for a lot of the people. He spoke of real estate values, stating that the
building, zoning, and history of use was there. He said that perception was a key factor in
property values, and the unknown of having an empty facility probably hurts property value
more than the known of the well-run facility. He emphasized that the Zoning Administrator was
available, and he himself would be very sensitive to future complaints when this comes before
the Commission in the future. He supported the use.
Commissioner Casillas commented that Chula Vista as a community had come a long way in the
last few years. The involvement of citizens on the boards and commissions of the City was
paying off in quality participation. He said all were obligated to be cognizant of the health and
welfare of the community, and complimented those who went to the meeting and spoke. He
supported the program.
Commissioner Tugenberg felt the benefits to the general community of Chula Vista were
probably exceptional, but felt it would have an impact. He had voted for the Pioneer
rehabilitation and Nosotros, but was concerned about the impact this project would have on
Second Avenue and that community because the other projects were there. He felt the
community property values would go down no matter how well Victory was operated. He did
not support the program at that location.
Chair Fuller noted that a number of the persons who spoke in opposition to this program being
in that location were persons who, from the dates they said they moved there, bought homes in
a neighborhood they thought was a fine area of Chula Vista that already contained facilities that
had been there a number of years. People knew there was a mental health facility and bought
into the neighborhood knowing there was a large facility there zoned for this type of facility.
She felt that history should be taken into consideration.
l~/ '-/7
PC Minutes
-10-
May 13, 1992
Commissioner Martin was in favor of the program and an advocate of Victory Outreach. He
suggested that Victory Outreach might put together some form of local citizens monitoring
group, and invite them to come in at any time, to reach out to the community to meet their
concerns. He said there was crime, and he felt it was better to have someone under a systematic
controlled environment who was trying to do better within themselves.
Commissioner Carson believed Victory Outreach would be an outstanding program, but was
concerned about the location being near other types of programs. She was very disturbed to
hear about all the transits, although she assumed they were there. She hoped the Police
Department would try to do something about it. She would like to see Victory Outreach settle
in an area such as EastLake. She would not vote for the program as submitted. If it was
conditioned to be one year only, that there be spot checks, that a high percentage be for Chula
Vista residents, she might vote for it. Commissioners Carson and Tugenberg discussed what
the percentage might be.
MSC (CasillaslDecker) 5-2 (Commissioners Carson and Tugenberg voting against) that
based on the Initial Study and comments on the Initial Study and the Negative Declaration,
find that this project will have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative
Declaration issued on IS-92-30.
MS (Casillas/Martin) that based on the findings contained in Section E of the staff report,
recommend conditional approval to the City Council of PCC-92-34, subject to conditions 1
through 15.
Commissioner Decker asked that a condition be added allowing priority to Chula Vista residents.
The maker of the motion agreed to the amendment.
AMENDED MOTION:
Based on the findings contained in Section E of the staff report, recommend conditional approval
to the City Council of PCC-92-34, subject to conditions I through IS, and adding condition 16
as follows:
"16. Where possible, applicants who are residents of the City of Chula Vista
shall be given priority into the program."
Commissioner Tuchscher requested that no. 14 of Attachment A (Rules) which were
incorporated by condition #2, be revised to add the word "County."
There was general discussion as to the meaning of the rule, whether they would not be returned
to a facility in Chula Vista for that time period, rather than San Diego City or San Diego
County.
J5~_sO
PC Minutes
-11-
May 13, 1992
Pastor Guzman agreed that it could be changed to "Chula Vista." There was another Victory
Outreach in Escondido over which they had no authority.
RESTATED MOTION:
Based on the fmdings contained in Section E of the staff report, recommend conditional
approval to the City Council of PCC-92-34, subject to conditions 1 through 15, and adding
condition 16 as follows:
"16. Where possible, applicants who are residents of the City of Chula
Vista shall be given priority into the program."
and revising No. 14 of Attachment A (Rules) incorporated by condition #2, be revised to
add the words "Chula Vista."
VOTE:
5-2 (Commissioners Carson and Tugenberg voted against)
/~ C;~;;;- /
UNO~F~Cg!J.. 1~\gNUTES
MINUTES OF A SCHEDULED SPECIAL MEETING
Resource Conservation Commission
Chula Vista, California
6:00 p.m.
Monday, May 18, 1992
Conference Room 1
Public Services Building
CALL MEETING TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: Meeting was called to order at 6:14 p.m. by
Chairperson Hall with a quorum. City Staff Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid
called roll. Present: Commissioners Fox, Ray and Ghougassian. Absent: Johnson, Kracha.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: There was no quorum present to approve the minutes of April 20
and May 11, 1992. Continued to next meeting.
'1. Draft EIR-92-01 Eastlake I SPA Plan Amendment: Marilyn ponseggi, Consultant, Katie
Wright of Eastlake Development and Marti Borg of Lettiere-Mcintyre Associates
addressed the issues of significant and unmitigated impacts as they related to traffic,
air quality and housing. With the building of the 125 freeway, the last phase of the
hospital parking facility will decrease the LOS of the traffic in that immediate area.
Hall stated the parking garage is probably the best mitigation for noise on the hospital.
With this plan amendment, there will be 405 dwelling units lost. It was suggested by
Hall to have council consider low cost and other housing be included somewhere
within the project. After questions of the Commission were answered, it was then
MSUP (Fox/Ray) to recommend Planning Commission certify the EIR; 4-0.
2. Bud Gray discussed the Eastlake Air Quality Improvement Plan and Water Conservation
Plan. Hall questioned the use of express transportation service to the project site. The
current plan is for a trolley route through Otay Ranch which could also service this
area. Ghougassian asked about gray water/reclamation. A representative from Syntax
Associates discussed the creation of a mini treatment plant for recycled bath and/or
toilet water to water lawns, etc., however, stated it is a violation of health standards.
Vance Furukawa, Kaiser representative, discussed the alternate fuel for fleet service
and electrical vehicles. After discussions, it was then MSUP (Fox/Ray) to accept the
Air Quality Improvement Plan and Water Conservation Plan, with the request that
minimal guidelines by the city be established for future developers; 4-0.
f
3. Draft EIR-90-12, Olympic Training Center Boathouse. Lori McKinley, Consultant to the
Foundation, Dave Neilson, San Diego Sports Training, and Julie McColl, discussed the
issues on the EIR. It is noted that the land is owned by City of San Diego, however
its jurisdiction is under the City of Chula Vista for land use. The only mitigation was
to reduce the height of the main building to 14 feet. The other impacts would not be
mitigated to below a level of significance. It was MSUP (Ghougassian/Fox) to
recommend to certify the draft EIR. John Ray noted that this was a good project for
the City of Chula Vista.
Negative Declaration 15-92-30 Victory Homes of San Diego - No quorum available for I,ll
discussion, as Ghougassian has a conflict of interest in this project. II
it
4.
/~'S;L
negative declaration
PROJECT NAME: Victory Homes of San Die90
PROJECT LOCATION: 3 North Second Avenue, Chula Vista
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 563-310-26
PROJECT APPLICANT: Victory Outreach
590 Fir Street, San Diego
CASE NO: IS-92-30
DATE: April 3, 1992
A. Proiect Settinq
The proposed project is located at 3 North Second Avenue, on a 4.8 acre
site situated on a ridge line which drops off sharply to the east, to KOA
Kampground and more gently to the west and north to North Second Avenue.
Adjacent land uses include single-family homes to the west and south, and
open space and the KOA Kampground to the north and east. The site has
previously been disturbed and contains two main buildings, several
accessory buildings, and approximately 54 on-site parking spaces (much of
the parking space striping has faded). Access is provided by two
driveways off North Second Avenue. There are no sensitive plant or animal
resources on the site.
The existing facility on site has been used in the past as a 60-bed
residential treatment facility for emotionally disturbed youngsters --
first by Vista Hill and more recently by Southwood Psychiatric. In
February of 1991, Southwood vacated the site and consol idated operations
at their Third Avenue facility.
On November 6, 1991, a conditional use permit PCC-92-06 was granted
establishing a 12-bed residential treatment facility for recovering
alcoholics for a two-year period. The "Nosotros" Recovery Home for Latino
men is located on the southerly portion of the property. Thi.s facility
uses the smaller of the two main structures as a residential recovery home
three adjacent mobile trailer homes for classrooms and 30 off-street
parking spaces. The estimated stay is between three months and one year.
B. Proiect Descriotion
The proposed project is titled "Victory Homes of San Diego". Victory
Outreach, the applicant, has leased the facility for four years and is
proposing to provide an alcohol and drug rehabilitation program including
residential care, and religious and counseling support to male and female
adults 18 years and older. This proposal would central ize the services
for San Diego County in the South Bay area.
The admission criteria, as required by the State of California Drug Abuse
Treatment Program, is designed for individuals with primary drug abuse
problems. Sixty adults with no history of violen~ behavior are referr~lrt.
-.-
.....,;""~ -
~~~~
is'' fJ city of
chula vista planning department CllY OF
environmental review ..clion CHULA VISTA
- 2 -
to the facility for a period of six months to one year from a variety of
sources i ncl udi ng: probation offi cers, courts, churches, soci al workers,
and community services. The average stay is six months to one year and
funding is through personal donations and guaranteed income payments.
Eighty percent of the residents would be from San Diego County eighteen
percent would be from other southern California cities, two percent would
be from other states.
Services provided to residents include: a minimum of 20 hours per week of
pastoral counseling, structured therapeutic activities, volunteer tutorial
services, vocational counseling and training through existing County and
State agencies, job referral placement, legal services, social
recreational services, and individual family counsel ing through community
services. The services listed above do not take place on the site.
Within the first 30 days of admission, a treatment plan is structured for
each resident.
Residents are not permitted to have vehicles on site. Twenty staff who
are trained by "Victory Homes" will be on site from 6:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. Night Managers will be there between 5:00 p.m. until 6:00 a.m.
Security will be provided between 10 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
If a conditional use permit is granted to permit this facility to be used
as proposed, the staff of Victory Outreach state that the residents and
use of the current "Nosotros" recovery home on the property will be
compatible as both programs are for adults, with similar staff approaches
and both programs deal with either drug or alcohol rehabilitation.
C. Comoatibilitv with ZoninQ and General Plans
The General Plan designation is mistakenly shown as Open Space on the
General Plan Map. As part of the lower Sweetwater Special Study Area
Genera 1 Pl an Amendment, th is site wi 11 be redes i gnated as Pub 1 i c/Quas i
Public. The proposed project implements this designation. The zoning is
R-3 "Apartment Residential". The Chula Vista Municipal Code requires a
Conditional Use Permit for the proposed facility. With compliance to the
conditions of approval for the Conditional Use Permit, the proposed
project would be compatible with the zoning.
D. Comoliance with the Threshold/Standards Policv
1. Fire/EMS
The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that fire and medical units
must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of
the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City
of Chul a Vi sta has i ndi cated that thi s threshold standard wi 11 be
met, since the nearest fire station is 1-1/2 miles away and would be
associated with a 4 minute response time. The proposed project will
comply with this Threshold Policy.
The Fire Department states that the proposed fence on the east side
of the facility is unacceptable, as it blocks the required fire
apparatus access. In order to make certain that bus parking
associated with the fac i 1 i ty does not interfere with fi re apparatus
access, a clear width of 20 feet must be maintained at all times
pursuant to Uniform Fire Code results. ,,~~~
- 3 -
The Fire Department will require additional information from the
applicant, including the number of occupants, type and scope of the
program. The Fire Department further requires that the alarm and
sprinkler systems be maintained in an operable condition at all
times. Additionally, information on whether any occupants will be
ambulatory is required. The applicant must provide the Fire
Department with plans detailing all fire protection equipment on
site, as the occupancy classification of the facility.
2. Pol ice
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must
respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes or less and
ma i nta i n an average response time to all Pri ority 1 calls of 4.5
minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2
calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time
to all Pri ority 2 call s of 7 mi nutes or 1 ess. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Policy.
The Police Department has indicated that an acceptable level of
service will be maintained for this project.
3. Traffic
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that all intersections must
operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "CO or better, with the exception
that Level of Service (LOS) "0" may occur during the peak two hours
of the day at signal i zed intersections. Intersections west of 1-805
are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection
may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour.
Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this
policy. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy.
The existing level of service (LOS) for North Second Avenue is "CO
and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is 5,070. After completion of
the project, the LOS would remain "CO and the ADT would be 5,430.
The traffic generated would not exceed existing pre-approved uses.
The Engineering Department may require an irrevocable offer of
dedication. North Second Avenue is designated as a Class I Collector
in the Chula Vista General Plan. Sufficient dedication may be
required to meet the half-width standards of said dedication.
4. Parks/Recreation
The Threshold/Standards
acres/I,OOO population.
Threshold Policy.
Policy for Parks and Recreation is 3
The proposed project will comply with this
15'5S-
- 4 -
5. Drainage
The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that storm water flows and
volumes not exceed City Engineer Standards. Individual projects will
provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master
Plan (s) and Ci ty Engineeri ng Standards. The proposed project wi 11
comply with this Threshold Policy.
On-site drainage is surface flow to Second Avenue. Off-site surface
water flows north to a downstream curb inlet which discharges to the
Sweetwater River. The City Engineering Department has determined
that these facilities are adequate to serve the proposed project.
6. Sewer
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that sewage flows and volumes
shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects
will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master
Plan (s) and City Engi neeri ng Standards. The proposed project wi 11
comply with this Threshold Policy.
The existing 6" sewer lateral on-site, which connects to 8" VCP in
North Second Avenue is adequate to serve the proposed project. The
proposed project will not cause sewage waste to exceed existing use.
7. Water
The Threshol d/Standards Pol icy requi res that adequate storage,
treatment, and transmission facil ities are constructed concurrently
with planned growth and that water quality standards are not
jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Policy.
E. Identification of Environmental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista determined that the
proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect, and the
preparat i on of an Envi ronmenta 1 Impact Report wi 11 not be requi red. A
Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of
the State CEQA Guidelines.
The following impacts have been determined to be less than significant. A
discussion of each of these less than significant impacts from the
proposed project follows.
~
Due to recent drought conditions, as a condition of project approval, the
applicant must agree to no net increase in water consumption or
participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City
of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
/5"'5'6
- 5 -
Traffic
The Engi neeri ng Department may requi re an i rrevocabl e offer of
dedication. North Second Avenue is designated as a Class I Collector in
the Chula Vista General Plan. Sufficient dedication may be required to
meet the half width standards of said dedication.
land Use
As stated under section C. Comoatibilitv with Zonina and General Plan,
with an approved conditional use permit, this project will be compatible
with the zoning and the General Plan as redesignated as Public/Quasi
Publ ic. As there are single family homes to the west and the south and as
this location has been used for a number of years for a treatment center
it is to be expected that there may be questions regarding the security of
the use, and whether as a land use it is compatible with the surrounding
single family residences. With attention to concerns that may come from
surrounding residents and the addressment of those concerns in the form of
conditions, this could be a compatible land use.
Noise
As a zoning enforcement official in El Cajon, where another Victory
Outreach Home is located mentioned that neighbors have made complaints
about noise from the facility. Strict regulations regarding noise should
be required as one of the conditions on the conditional use permit.
Fire
The proposed fence on the east side of the facility is unacceptable as it
blocks the required fire apparatus access. The fire apparatus access must
have a 20 foot wide clearance maintained at all times.
The applicant is required to forward to the fire department details on the
number of occupants, type and scope of the program, number of ambul atory
clients if any, plans detailing all protection equipment on site, and the
occupancy classification of the facility.
The applicant further is required to make sure that the fire alarm and
sprinkler systems be maintained in an operable condition at all times.
Enaineerina
The. Engineering Department may require an irrevocable offer of
dedication. Sufficient dedication may be required to meet the half-width
standards of said dedication.
Schools
School Fees will be required unless the project is found to be exempt
pursuant to Community Care Laws. Residential structures .have been
required to pay fees to mitigate school costs.
/5-57
- 6 -
F. MitiGation necessarv to avoid si.Gnificant effects
The proposed project is not associated
significant environmental impacts,
mitigation will be required.
G. FindinGs of InsiGnificant Imoact
Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project
described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no
environmental impact report needs to be prepared.
with any significant or potentially
therefore, no project specific
1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
conmunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory.
The proposed project does not have the potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the natural environment. The site is
currently developed and there are no endangered plant or animal
species present. There are no cultural or historic resources on the
site.
2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental
goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals.
The project will not achieve short-term environmental goals at the
expense of long-term environmental goals because these long-term
goals will be achieved through the conditional use permit process and
the condi t ions of project appro va 1. With compl i ance to the
conditions of a CUP, the project will be consistent with the zoning
designation.
3. The project has possible effects which are individually limited but
cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, "cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.
The proposed project will not result in any significant adverse
environmental effects which are cumulative in nature, provided all
condi t ions pursuant to the issuance of a CUP are fulfi 11 ed. The
group home is not expected to result in secondary projects or have a
growth inducing influence.
4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
/5-.rar
- 7 -
There are no environmental effects from the project which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or
indirectly. No public health impacts were identified in the Initial
Study.
H. Consultation
1. Individuals and OrQanizations
City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering
John Lippitt, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Bob Sennett, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building and Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Martin Schmidt, Parks and Recreation Department
Barbara Reid, Planning
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent: Tony Guzman
590 Fir Street
San Diego, CA
2. Documents
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
General Plan, City of Chu1a Vista
3. Initial Study
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial
Study, any comments received on the Initial Study and any comments
recei ved duri ng the publ it revi ew peri od for the Negative
Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review
of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning
Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chu1a Vista, CA 92010.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR
EN 6 (Rev. 12/90)
WPC 0241p
/5,,5',
APPLICATION CANNOT BE h~CEPTED UNLESS SITE PlAN
IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN B-I/2 X 11 FOLDER
fOR OFFlCE USE
INITIAL STUOY
~:;:,~:. /':t:'~~
Receipt tro. ~~
Date Rec'd ~d
Accepted by
Project No. _ ~,.\">
A. BACKGROUND
City of Chula Vista
Application form
I. PROJECT TITLE VICTORY HOMES OF SAN DIEGO
2. PROJECT lOCATION (Street address or description)
g North Second Avenue, Chu1a Vi sta, Ca. 91910
. Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. . ~ ~- :r/o -...7/_
3. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION Alcohol and Druq Rehabilitation proqram
will D).ovid~ gprvicps ~n drt30 ~nd ~'rnhn' dpnpndpnt~
,
It is a Christian proaram.
4. Name of Applicant VICTORY OUTREACH
Address 590 Fir Street
City San Dieoo State Ca.
5. Name of Preparer/Agent Tony Guzman
Address 590 Fir Street
Phone 619 237~0373
lip 9101
Phone 619 237-0373
City San Dieoo St.ate Ca. lip 9101
Relation to Applicant Executive Directol:/Pastor
6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents
required by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
a. Permits or approvals required:
--- General Plan Amendment ___ Design Review Application ___ Public Project
--- Rezone/Prezone ___ Tentative Subd. Hap ___ Annexation
--- Precise Plan ___ Grading Permit ___ Redevelopment Agency
--- Specific Plan ___ Tentative Parcel Hap ___ O.P.A.
~ Condo Use Permit ___ Site Plan & Arch.Review ___ Redevelopment Agency
--- Variance ___ Project Area Committee D.D.A.
___ Coastal Development Use Permit ___ Other
Permit
b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review
Coordinator).
___ Grading Plan . Arch. Elevations
___ Parcel Map === landscape Plans
--- Precise Plan ___ Tentative Subd. Hap
~ Specific Plan ___ Improvement Plans
___'Other Agency Permit ___ Soils Report
or Approvals Required ___ Hazardous Waste
Assessment
___ Hydrological Study
___ Biological Study
___ Archaeological Survey
___ Noise Assessment
___ Traffic Impact Report
___ Other
WPC 9459P
-6-
~ .
/7/& D
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
1. land Area: sq. footage or acreage Five (5)
If land area.to be dedicated. state acreage and purpose.
2. Complete this section if project 1s residential.
a. Type development: Single family Two family
Multi family Townhouse Condominium
b. Total number of structures
c. Maximum height of structures
d. Humber of Units: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms
3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms Total units
e. Gross density (DU/total acres)
f. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication)
g. Estimated project population
h. Estimated sale or rental price range
i. Square footage of structure
, j. Percent of lot coverage by bUildings or structures
k. Number of on-site parkl~g spaces to be provided
1. Percent of site in road and paved surface
.
3. Complete this section if .project Is commercial or industrial or ~
ill.
a.
b.
Type(s) of land use
F1 oor area
Type of construction
Height of structure(s)
used In the structure
c.
d. Describe major access points to the structures and the
orientation to adjoining properties and streets
e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided
f. Estimated number of employees per shift , Number of
shifts Total
g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate ___
h. Estimated number of deliveries per day
WPC 9459P
-7-
/5-; ~ /
I. Estimated range of service area ind basis of estimate
j. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings
k. Hours of operation
1. Type of exterior lighting
4. If project is Dther thAn residential, commercial or industrial
complete ,this section.
I. Type of project Rehabilitation Christian Home
b. Type of facilities provided
c. Square feet of enclosed structures 29,000 sq. ft.
d. Height of structure(s) - maximum 22' - 0"
e. Ultimate occupancy load of project 60
f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided 32
g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces
, h. Additional project characteristics
"Same as 60-bed Hospital Facility. Cover sheet Info.
C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
1. If the project could result in, the direct emission of any air
pollutants, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) Identify them.
N/A
2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated
(If yes, complete the following:)
a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards of
earth will be excavated?
b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed?
c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded?
d. What will be the - Maximum depth of c~t
Average depth of cut
Maximum depth of fill
Average depth of fill
, WPC Sl4S9P
-8-
..-'
I;...~ _/ --,
1/./ u/~
3. Will there be any noise generated from the proposed project site or
from points of access which may impact the surrounding or adjacent
land uses? No
4. Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed
project and the type of energy used (air conditioning, electrical
appliance, heating equipment, etc.) A~)- Conditionino, Heatinq
Kitchen Appllances, Washers an Dryers
5. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project
(sq. ft. or acres)
6. If the project will result in any employment opportunities describe
the nature and type of these jobs. Six to eight staff members,
Proaram Director. onp A~~i~~ant P].nnr~m nirp~tnr
7.
Will highly flammable or potent ially
substances be used or stored
sHe? Nn
8. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by
the project? 20 for staff
explosive materials or
within the project
9. Descrl be (I f any) off -s He improvements necessary to implement the
project, and their points of access or connection to the project
sHe. Improvements include but not limited to the following: new
streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer
lines; cut and fill slopes; a~d pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
None
D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
1. GeoloQv
Has a geology study been conducted on the property? N/A
(If yes, please attach)
Has 2 Soils Report on the project site been made? N/a
(If yes, please attach)
2. HvdroloQv
Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the
site? No (If yes, please explain in detail.)
a. Is there any surface evidence .of a shallow ground water
table?
b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or
- adjacent to the site?
WPC 9459P
-9- /~~/6 J
c. Does tunoff from the project site drain directly into or toward
a domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay?
d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to
adjacent areas?
e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their
location.
3 . .H2.1.a
a. Are there any nolse sorces in the project vicinity which may
impact the project site? No
4. Bioloav
a. Is the project site In a natural or partially natural state?
No
b. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the property?
Yes
No
(Please attach a copy).
,
c.
Describe
location,
any) will
all trees and vegetation on the site.
height, diameter, and species of trees, and
be removed by the project.
Indicate
which (if
5. Past Use of the land
a. Are there any known historical or archeological resources
located on or near the project site? No
b. Are there any known paleontological resources? No
c.
Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on
or near the project site? No
d.
What was the land previously used for? Existin~ building
on site previously used for group nome a a
~n ~pn HORnital Facilitv
WPC 9459p
-10-
/<~tL/
6. Current land Use
a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the
project sHe. R..",idential scaled structures an.d .paved
oar-kina lot.s
b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on
adjacent property.
Horth Vacant and open land
South Residential area
East Onpn' ~nn
West Rp-Ridential Area
7. Social
a. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?) No
b. Are there any current employment opportunities on site? (If so,
how many and what type?) Same as Item C-6
,
8. Please provide any other Information which may assist In the.
evaluation of the proposed project.
See attached "Victory Outreach Christian Residential
Rehabilitation Program"
.
WPC 9459P
.11.
----- / ./
/> -V7
E. llB1IOCATI(m
J.
Owner/owner 1n escroW*
or
J Tony Guzman
.
,
Executive Director/Pastor'
Consultant or Agent*
or
HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and information
herein contained are 1n all respect~ true and correct and that all known
1nformation concerning the project and its setting has been included 1n this
appllcatlon for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any
enclosures for attachments thereto.
DATE:
*If acting for a corporation, 1nclude capacity and company name.
WPC 94S9P
-12-
-- / I
-';; -~~,
.
,
,-
CITY DATA
Case No. .b - ~""-_?"o
F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1.
Current Zonina on site:
) North
South
East
West
~-,~
R-3 ~c::.l n
Q -\
~
$;t-\
c"'-
Does the project conform to the current zoning?
{f""'t'\A"t-\.'r"n\ ,'"\..~ ?'''~\~
\),.~~ ~.'t-\~ a..
,
2.
General Plan land use
designation on'site:
North
South
East
West
~~ ~::
O~~~~C~
" ~o..cp
'l\..o.F:"l v-\--..>t\ \0 \
Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram? YQ~
Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent
to an area so des i gnated? 'Ir-,,<
Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? ~\ ~
(If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance
the scenic quality of the route.)
3. ~chools
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following:
Students
Generated
From Proiect
Schoo 1
Permanent
Caoacitv
Temporary
CaD!citv
Current
Enrollment
Elementary
Jr. High
Sr. High
4. Remarks:
~\f>..
'-f3 ~ rel
Director of Plann'ng or Representative
-Ap'iI c), 1'1 '1~
~.l i
Date
W?C 9459P
-13-
/-~--~ /
YS-~I
G. !NGINE~~G DEPARTMENT
Case No. r-:=...q;;2-35"
1. Dra1naoe
a. Is the project site within a flood plain? JJn.
If so,' state which FEHA Floodway Frequency Boundary ...,rA
b. What is the location and description of existing on-site
drainage facilities? ~lJlZ=r.r;: R-ow Tz:> ':;':",,/0./1:> AIIl!F,..JU.. .
c. Are they adequate to serve the project? y~~.
If not, explain briefly. I-{/A.
d. What is the location and description of existing off-site
drainage facilit ie5? S(J1Z.F~E. I='t.ow JJOlZ'T"/.lk/A~ kL.c:oJ' "'~"'''''''Jt:>
AVEJ..J~ -n:> t>e>1o'\h.l~7r::A.'" ev1Z.A IAJL.F'T'"'J WI4,C.U D(CJ4~ArI'2&.~ Tr:>
'Tl+~ GWE:€TWAn:1Z- /ZIv~/Z..
e. Are they adequate to serve the project? ~E~.
If not, explain briefly. ~h. ,
2. Transoortation
a. What roads provide primary access to the project? ^'O~ e;~~~/t>
A V/';NlJEE .
b. What is the estimated number of one-way auto triDs to be
generated by the project (per day)? 3~ A:D'r
-r.&-l I~ ~.c, ...u,-r ~~~~ ~o2- .lJ"PFt:Zr:::VEO I t€:c ~ V'AI""...(urr .
c. What is the ADT and estimated level of service before and after
project completion?
. Before After
A.D.T. 507D !>43D
L.O.S.
LoS"c"
/,.Oc; '~C (f
If the A.D. T. or L.O.S. 15 unknown or not applicable, expl ain
briefly. ',.J/,4
d. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project? If
not, explain briefly. 'I~.
WPC 9459P
-14-
j <j-l, :Y'
Ys-s;;2./
,
e.
Case No. rs- Q::L-35'
Are there any intersections at or near the point that wt11
result in an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS)? NO.
If so, identify: Location AI!;.
Cumulative L.O.S. A!/.4 .
ItfJ 1/Z1ZEVDt:A~ ~6JZ ~ 1:f:C>G'(17Dl-r
Is there any dedication required? M.A'f BE. Pz:,::UI~O.
If so, please specify. NDJZ:nl.;z:,."AlDAv","NU~ " zx~,t:./.LI.="A<:A.Cl'~S.zz:
Ci;)U;/~fZ IIJ rilf: CJ.ttlLA VtC7;l( L:;::,J&,OAJ C't A. '. ~tJr:F(G1 E"-', ~Er:"CAT10,..J
M....y $e. IZet(uIIUL? 7[) MUr 1"116 H4c..F-+tItDrl-/ ST14,..~r;GOF &o./D ~77D'
Is there any street Wideni~ required? lJo.
If so, please specify. N .' .
.
f.
g.
h. Are there any other street improvements required? ~o.
If so, please specify the general nature of the necessary
improvements. N/A.
,
3. Soils
a. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the
project site? UN/4.IOWN
b. If yes, specify these conditions. ~~
c. Is a sol1 s report necess~ry? No.
4. Land Form
a.
What
What
6/ZA.;1'~
is the average ftltwr slope of the site?
is the maximum ~~slope of the site?
5%
L/o%
b.
5. Noise.
Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that
are significant enough to justify that a notse analysts be required
of the applicant? ~
6. Waste Generation
How lIuch solld and llquid (sewage) waste wll1 be generated by the
proposed project per day?
wt..S.~y DI-1i'JZ- Pltt~
Sol id ,4PPIlCIIED ~ -. -rHE.
p..t;lt-I ry'.
What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or
downstream from the site? ," 5EW€/L. /-L'T"Z"'~ otJ-'S,"n'_ W#ICU 4>/>.JNJ!i:.7S
m .I!, ff IIc-P tAl ^,~/2'n.I ~E~ AvCNlJ#;' .
7.:20 GNJ-oHS ~ D4.y ova P/CJDf&.
L iouid APPIlbVEZ> USE FbIt.. rJI.E.. ~l..Irt.
Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? y~.
WPC 9459P
-15-
.)~tJ
-
Y5- S:2 f
"
Case No. ):"S-q.:>.-'55'
.'
7. Remarks
Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impacts,
mitigation measures, or other issues.
~1J~
Date
.
WPC 9459P
-16-
--'- r
t / _ /)~)
/ "7 (/
.
Case No. /5>- 9z- ~o
H. FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. What is the distance to the nearest fire station? AIlIl what is the
Fire Department's estimated reaction time? one and one-half miles.
Four minutes.
2. Will the Fire Department be able to provide an adequate level of fire
protection for the proposed facility without an increase in equipment
or personnel? Ye5
'3. Remarks
(''1~1 ,
l.- .
E. Horsfal for CAROL GaVE. Fire Marshal March 30. 1992
Fire Marshal Date
/_5' 7/
WPC 9459P
-17-
-Y .
~, u. fl.
Chula Vista Fire Department
Bureau of Fire Prevention
PLAN CORRECTION SHEET
Occupancy
Checker A.f~~I1[) D}te "3/;J.. ~ I '1~
- { (
No. Stories Bldg. Area
Address :3~,;;~ ~ Plan File No.
Type Constr.
The following list does not necessarily include all errors and omissions.
PROVIDE AND SHOW ON PLAN:
I. ~)
~..
\ .J1. I? 15 ,(,.1 .h () .;~
a.~/) d,JAA.l -<1- a......('.....(\~ Ll.><:l..-J.
.s,
1.
~1 )
(po
FD-648
-=P~G~ ctQrtLt'l~ ~ \M-U/VKAli~ ~
~/Ylb) ~ /o/Ud h~_./
~ ~/J~4'
I I
t~ltft:;~A~~~~WA::f'f;J~
~_IUIAJo) ~(j;-Yn) Iltt-. aLL) fr/j/z.(().)-<
oj uj ~ / ~A{UMti
C.U.:r
~:L-
~
Chula Vista Fire Department
Bureau of Fire Prevention
PLAN CORRECTION SHEET
Address B~. cZv...,t (]/XtJ.ftan File No.
CheCker~) L Date .a/~"'3 / ?;;2
t ,
No. Stories Bldg. Area
Type Constr.
Occupancy
The following list does not necessarily include all errors and omissions.
PROVIDE AND SHOW ON PLAN:
,Mff1Ilj.liJ-lA. ./ (0 f;~ fl{ ~AI-t: fMt ~
1. ::plZM-tJv ~,M.0Y ~~~h~d;-b-tA
1-~7s
FD-648
.
Cue No. IS-92~30
IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
J. Indicate which of the following hsues lIave been identified as having
potentially significant environmental .ffects and should be addressed in
an EIR. This list is not intended to be all-inclusive.
Aesthetic/Visual ,- " Schools/Universities
-.- -
Agricultural Land .. ~ r' Septic Systems
- -
- Air Quality - Sewer Capacity
- Archaeological/Historical - Soil/Erosion/Compaction/Grading
- Zoning/General Plan - Solid Waste
- Drainage/Absorption - Tox'ic/Hazardous
- Economic/Jobs Traffic/Circulation
- Fhcal - Vegetation
Flood Plain/~looding Water Quality
- Forest land/Fire Hazard - Water Supply/Groundwater
Geologic/Seismic Wetland/Riparian
Mineral s - Wildlife
- Nohe Growth Inducing
Population/Housing Blllnce land Use
Public Services/facilities Cumulative Effects
- Recreation/Parks Other
11. Summarize each issue briefly.
Schools
School Fees wil be require~ unless the project is found to be excempt
pursuant to Community Care laws.
Traffic Circulation
The Engineering Department may require an irrevocable offer of dedication
on North Second Ave.
All residents are prohibited from having their own vehicles. Traffic
impact with these two.measures wil be minimal.
Water
-
The applicant must agree to no net increase in water consumption or
participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the
City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
/,-,,~~ ? 1
,
>-...
Y\
~
\
I.
II.
_'I'
.....-...... ~In ,.,
(T. .. ee.1.t... I, L.... Agooc,1
......-
I.
I.
_.f r.. lOt ,,\\C~ n~~\( \\
AddreSI.............., t ,,,:::,,c1.C, \-,\ -:., \rN(-M;-
<:'r.t"-.\.t'hC:-' C.... C.
,
J.
4.
I.
Dot. .f Olotlll.t
- .f ",-"I
'.'t'.' S~ .......
I..\\.;,\q""
\.\\, ~~~,,:"~:;"_'::.~a"'_\)""('\ 0
bot_I ~
C&,'..U_., Ill.,... .. ...,... .-. IN ......Irod. .U_
........1
IlfC "SIP
I. r.tII. 1111 till _1 ....1t ,.:
I. "~1. Mrt' e_IIU.. ... .......
,. ...'..'e ....t...t....,
.. ,,"',_. ....,..-t..
c-..cU. .. ........ _unt.. .f U.
IOnl
c. ~ II tll"..... ... ..-
.or'", ..11., '..t....,
..
1lle "'tract,.. _.. ...
....,"c.U.. ., .., .1.. ...'..Ie
... ~ICI' f..t....,
-10-
m II!!Il III
- - ~
v'
--
,/
,/
--
..
.., ,....... I. .... ... lOOt... _,..
., ..n., .t...... .. .. elf tM Itt.'
f.
~ ,. .....ltl. ... _I. .,
belch ....... or ct..... t. 'ntlu....
.poIIU... .,. ere,t.. ....'e" ...,
-.dtfJ' tM 0...1 .f . rt.... ...
Itn_ er the bid of UtI ..... ... .,
..,. I.'.t or ,.tor
t.
1_.... of _1. ... -" II
r.:109IC "IINS ad .1 ..rt.........
lnetlHde., -.lIU." ......
f.'llre, er at.tlar ..Zlrd.,
2.
.'r. 1111 .....1t ,.:
.. SIbIt..tl.1 .'r .....,.. ...
dOt.rl.,.tl.. ., ...,.. .Ir q001'trr
.. 1lle ....U. ., "'Jod'''''. ......,
c. .U...atl. of .'r _. ...t....
... t.....nt..... ... -.r ct...... t"
ell_t.. .u.., 'oc.'" ... ..,1_I1,r
J. ....... 1111 till "'-", ....1t '.1
.. ~. ,. arnat.. ... Ua ....... ...
lIlItrectt.. If ..t... ......tl. t..
.1_ _,.. ... ,.... ...tonr .
.. ~ ,. .....,.,. -. "'-
"u...... .. De -rite ... _t .f
........ .-,"
c.
.1t....U_ t. till ....... ... ft. .,
n.... ...t....r
IIPC "5"
.11.
--
--
_ M:""
............
v
\/'
~
v
- --
v
--
--
,./
v
"-
J\
\ .
\J
R'-.
'.
we MSIP
.
.. ~ ,.u._,,__......
,. 10, _tor W" .
..
11-.,0 'IlIo __ _,..... ... ..,
alt.,..u.. .f IWfKO wter ...Ut,.
'oc'''''" IoIt .., 11."... ,.
,-..,.... .....,... 'QIIII ...
'nldlt"
f.
Al_'. ., till .....". .. nta
.f n... .f ..- _t....,
,.
~ I. U. -'''' ., ......
Wlter., eit_ t..,..... d'reet
ICIdtUMI ... .n.......1s. ... .........
,.to.....tI.. " .. ....' for III nt. or
.....It_.,
..
MI''''Ill .......11.. ,. ,.. _,
.f ".t... ......"",. ..,nabl. ,.
,..lIe ..tor ......11..'
I.
~ ., _1. .. ~, II
wat... nl.ted _llnIs 1tIC. I.
flood'.. .. tldol _ft.,
..
PI_ LIra. 1111 u. _1 ....11 ,.!
I. ~ ,. U. """'" " _'H.
or _ .f .., .,..,.. " "lOts
Ct.l.... t...... Ih"... ..'SS,
e....... oM _lie "..ts"
..
_I. ., U. -.. ., ..,
..,..... ... .. """_.... """" .f
,11"tst
c.
lotrooloct'" ., _ "",'H " '1....
tato In '''If .. t. . "'rrl.,. to the
-, .."..'_t .f ..ltll..
',..'H'
.n-
/
./
./
./
--
v
-/
./
./
v
we M5"
..
_II.. ,. ....,. " ..,
...'eolt,,"l e..,'
I.
Ao'_1 LIra. 1m u. _..I....1t ,.!
I. ~ ,. U. """It, " "",'H.
er .......... If MI, ,,.cta ., _'_11
'bird.. ,..., ..,..Is 'oc''''t..
..,tll... ft.. . ....l1ft... Mot.'e
......,... or '..octs)1
..
_II.. " t.. -.. ., ..,
..t..... .... .. __.... """H .f
_'_hf
c.
lot_'_ '" _ _'H .,
n'_1I tato .. 1"'1, .. "'Ilt t. .
....tor to till .,,...11.. .. _
If .'.11'
..
Dotor,...II.. t. ....II.. ft.. ..
wt'd"f. "btllt'
..
.,,,, 1111 t.. _..1 ....11 '"
I. locno... ,. ....II.. .,. '_I"
.. ~....f _1. II _ .,.
11..h?
7.
L1tM ... CI..... 1m t.. ".,...,
,,,,,,_ _ 1I",t or ,10..,
e.
lood III. 1111 till _"I ....It ,. .
lubstanttal alterltl. of .... ,...HIt ...
p"..... I. no .f .. ....,
.n-
,
_-v
t./""'
--
--y
./
v
v
y
\/"
..v'"
~
\r-\
\
''1
"'-J
IlI't 94591'
t.
......1 "SOWCfl.
"lull in:
Will tho ...-..1
..
IftCrt!u@ f. the rete .f .H .f en,
nalural F9SDurcel'
'0.
Iht. .f UpseL 1"11 tM proposal Iwwolve:
..
A rid; of In ..,lol'Oft or tM "l.ISO
of hazardous substances (Including.
but not 1t.tt'" to 011. ~sttcld..s.
ChMluh or radhttGft) In t-.. ennt
of In 'cctd~t or upset conditions?
b. 'OH 1M. '..ter'~. with In
~rq~n(' r..sponse plan or In
~~.."(' e.aeultlon ,Ian?
II.
......hU... ""1 tN ,","ul alter the
lout ton. dhtrtbutton. dflwstty. Dr qrowth
rat. of the h~n populi.'" of In Ire.?
'2.
"""'_ '''11 the proposal a"ect
..htlfll) housing. or c....le . __net for
addItIonal housIng?
tJ.
Tr...sportat '_/Clrca.,tt...
propoul Telalt In:
.111
tho
..
,"..r.t.Oft 0' nbstlftU.l eddtU_Il
.ehlcular ~~ntl
b.
[ffects .. eltst'ng plrtlng
hcUttt.s. cr __net for MW p.rUng?
c. Sabshnt.... '1IpICt upoR ..tltt...
transport.t'on "SlelS?
d.
Alt....UOfts to "'"Nt patt"",s of
circulation Dr ~t of ,.opl.
and/or toOds'
.,c.
./
J
~
J
..;
./
~
:i
_.f.
IlI't 94591'
.
eo A,t@r.ttOll. t. ..t.rtIonte. ...n ...
"r tnfftc1
v
f. ""="11. 'n tr,'flc hu.rd, t. .tor
.~hlcl~s. bicyclists or ~str'.nsl
~
Ie.
Public SPnfces. "'11 th@ Itf"DPOSI' .,M
.n efr~ct upon. or ~salt In . ~ for hPW
or altf'r" C)Onrn.ental ..".ful In '''7 of
tftto 'oHowtng .,-.u:
I. ft" prohet Ion?
,/
I/'
b.
Pol Ice protKt 'Oft?
c.
S(hoo1s7
/'
d.
'.rh or
hclltttt'sl
at'-
rec....t fon.1
v
e. ".fnt8.nn of publtc '.eUtt'.s,
'ndudlng roads?
f. Ot"" gOw"..,.tal ,....tc.S?
~
IL"
15.
(-"11. win the proponl ~s.Jt ,..:
I. Us. of subshntt.l .....1 .f ,., or
""""J,7
./
b.
Subshfttt.l tllCl'@'S. 1a dMlncr
..fstfng Sources or eft@rgy,
~Ire tM ftftlop11l!ftt of
Sources of erten)J1
-
or
....
t/
16.
n.r.."1ds.
tlllput the
PoUetes?
.'" tho ...-.1 adwn.l,
tit,., Threshold/Stand.rds
./
-25-
'-
J\
,
',J
\><)
,
lIPt "stP
t. _, 11>-_.. "'" 1M _..1
NI.1t ta:
a.
I....... I. 1M ra1a ., _ ., ...,
Nt..., "HWCO.'
./
II. lIst .,.,.. "'" 1M _, I_I..:
.. . rill., . ..,1..,. ... 1M ..,....
.f tau....... 1"ltMC.. (IKt.'",.
...t ROt U.it_ to on, ..sUcld..,
e_'tllI ... ractlaU.' t. the ..lilt
.f .. _I<Ioot ... ""..t e_lltt...,
/
..
....,.,. 1_...... Ill,. .
-....RCJ N'poII.1 ,1. ... 1ft
__, ......tI.. "..,
/
II.
....btl.. "'" t.. _.1 aI_ t..
loeaU..., ."trtlMrtfH, M.tt,. ... pwtll
rat. of tM ___ ,.,.,.U... If . ....al
J
12.
_,,,, "'" 1M _, .fr..t
..flU", _It... .. create . ..... for
oddlt,...1 _'.
j
u.
" __tetI0l\/l:1_11t...
~lll re..tt fa:
a. -....., _Ial ....ltl_1
....Icol.r _U
"'"
1M
J
..
[fract. . ..totl.. """"
f..Il'tI.., .. ...... f.. _ tortl..'
./
/
e.
SohtMtla1 teeact. _ at.tI..
t..........tI. .,.lMs'
d.
.'_1_ .. ....... eet'- .1
elrcollt1Oll .. _ .f _'I
u41... ......'
v
.24-
lIPtM!III'
.
a.
.'t_'_ .. .t_. ran ..
.1, tr"'tc?
J.C
I.
I....... I. trlffle ..._ .. ell..
..hlcl.., "c,clllll er .....tr.Ift.!
.;,/
14.
Mite Serolcn. "'" 1M _, ....
In offKt upon. ... "'Ilt t. . IlHd ,... MW
or alhntd 9O"~t., ..,..tel. t. ...,. .f
the following ,rell:
I. F'.. ,..toct'..,
./
./
.c'
,/
./
./
..
..11.. tNt.et,..,
c.
.SC....h'
d.
'Irb ...
focllttll"
~
NCNatl_l
I.
1Io'.t_. ., ...lte I..IlIU..,
'oclodl.. ......,
I.
otMr to..... _..t.t .....tnt'
15.
r..v. 1111 t.. _, _.It II:
a. .... .r _t..tlal _ ., f\001 ..
....."
/
.. . Soht",,"l ,....... I. .... _
..hU.. ICMII"CII .. .."", ...
,-I.. till _1_t .r _
laurel. ., ....."t
./
II.
_11.. 1111 1M _, _ 1M
Clt,'. lh.....,d/St.......-. "lie',"
.J
.n-
~
~
"J
~
.
we "5"
17.
_ ...1... Itll Do _1 ...."
t.:
..
_I. elf ...
.-t......l ....,,~
_to' ....,,~)'
V'
./
....1.. ........ ...
...... (..c,..t..
.. ~ If _1. 11 .-t...thl
....,.. ........"
-
II.
...tIlotICl. Itll ... _.1 ....." ,.
t'" ..t...tt.. ., ., Ie_Ie .ht. or wt..
_ to Do ...".. ... w'" tho _..1
"1.1t t. tM (Nltt. .f III ...theUcall,
.ff....,.. .It. _ II """C .,..,
/
It.
~I.. Itll ... _1 ....." ,.
.. ,....t _ Do ....lIty .. .....lIty .f
..t.t'.. ........t,..., ",""..,t,..,
./
It.
CII1_1 "t..-_.
.. Itll... _.1 ....." I. t...
11t_'. .f .. ... do.treet'... .f .
....t.t..,. ... b'.tOP'.
...._'..'..1 .Ito'
d
.. Itll... _, ....." '0 _
"",'cI1 ... M.tMttc .ffects to .
......tOPi. ... b..tOPi. ..l1dt...
.t...t..... ... ...toeU
'-
.. ....... _I .... Do ~'"l
to ..... I ....71'... <"- ""cb
_II ",fKl ..t.... _'e ..It...,
.1,...7
j
J
d. , Itll ... _"' _trld ........
...""... .. ........ .... ....,. tho
.-t...th' I_t .....,
.It-
IlPC "5"
fl.
~ '...1... If S....'-.
.. .... t'" IftJoct .... ... fI1Iot'"'
t. dotndo ... ...."ty II t...
_'_t, _1Io...11y _ tho
....tt.t . 1ft,. ... .t1e1ltf.
lpet'.', an. I ".. ... wf1dltf.
,.,.,.,t. to .... ..,... ..'f
I.stat..t.. ....11, UlNat.. t.
.1'.Int. . ,1Ml ... ...,
c_1t7. ...-.c. tM ....... ...
"strtct U. ...... .f . r.... ...
1Od........ ,1..t ... ..,_, ...
eU.I...t. ~..t ....,.. .f be
""or pert... If Ce"f...,. b"1Ir7
.r ......tory7
..
.... Do IftJoct .... t.. ~'"I
t. ...._ ......'- t. t...
".....ta,. or 1......teN.
_t_t.1 ...ls7 ,. ....rt.tIro
,.,..t .. t.. _1_ ,. _
tillite" KCIII"'I t. . relltl.." 1Ir'.'.
do".lU.. ....,.. If .._ ...11.
,..,.t... ,.,..to ..11 -... _11
,.,. tho fot....)
..
.... ... IftJoct .... lo,oct. _,..
... 'o4'.''''''y 11...... ...
._lott..,y c_I....b'., ,.
,..Joet _, .....t t_ ... ....
....rate N.-.rt.. .... tM ....t
.. ...b ......... .. ...lott.." _Ill
... ....... tho ,"oct .f t'" tet.' .f
t..... t_t. .. tho _'_t ,.
....tfl....t.)
d.
DaI. Do "..toct .... ...._1
o"octs _,.. ..11 ._ _,..tt.,
....... ."KI. .. _ ..,....
.ttllor d,...tI, ... 'o4'rectl"
-17-
/
JC"
./'
-_/
-
-
III. Detenaination
(To be completed by the Lead Agency.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have I significant .ffect on
the environment, and I NEGATIV~ DECLARATION will be prepared.......[ '>J-
I find that Ilthough the proposed project could have I significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significlnt effect in
this case because the l1itigation Masures described on In Ittached
sheet have been Idded to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WILL BE PREPARED...................................................[ ]
I find the proposed project MAY have I significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required........[ ]
(~/() /qy
Date f
'16' ifJ", d
Signaturel
For
\L) fc 1/'/
IV. SUMMARY OF ISSUES
List all significant or potentially significant impacts identified in
the Initial Study checklist form.
YES MAYBE
/~- /5(/
U,",_t" ft_,P"",
_"D_
J
M. DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION
(Cha~ 1706, Statutes of 1990 - AS 3158)
.k It is hereby found that this project involVes no potential for
any adverse .ffect, either individually or cumulatively on
wildlife resources and that a .Certificate of Fee Exemption"
shall be prepared for this project.
_ It is hereby found that this project could potentially impact
wildlife, individually or cumulatively and therefore fees in
accordance with Section 711.4 (d) of the Fish and Came Code
shall be paid to the County Clerk.
V) ~,~vl :ff' .iJ !:J
Environmenta Revie Coordi at or
Date
V,1::9/9 ~
/~~/
WPC 9459P
-29.
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE
1J~i IOAfy '~'z./Ylat?
Name & Title of Person Completing Form
Date
REGIS~/T,Ir AS
NAME OF PROGRAM V _ ~
.)7'cJ F,/t.- Sf
Number and street
A DRUG ABUSE
!)JV1~ eI
PROGRAM --
cLd
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
I (;,/9.cd ]-7_ (J ~7
Phone
PARENT ORGANIZATION NAME
Ilrfr
I ~ ~-('p (',1-
CJ.ty
a~<'</'~ 4I//V,d~u~r
I f2-/0 /
ZJ.p
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
~~'r/ I!~:i. Au
Number and Street
/ fB
City
/ if~~ )~/- $/5/Q
ho e
/?'~~,r fA- / 9-/7'rh
Zip
f;{J -~AV --
AdmJ.nis r
Description of Services (in one or two sentences)
(4L$, ;1/~dJ.. +-'. fJ ~~
-- . ,
t
(1.{/J2/:
6 A-U> -z 9.~
~(;f
.' Type and Nwnber Served Annually
Days/Hours of Operation
Are bilingual services available?
................. .
;K
yes
no
If yes, please specify language(s)
5/?~
I
Are you accessible to disabled persons?
........... .
yes
)(
/
no
Please complete the fee requirements for your program. Check or complete
all that apply.
Per Visit
Sliding Scale
---Insurance Accepted
---Medi-Cal
---CHAMPUS
---Other - Please explain:
Additional information (please describe):
Per Month of Ser.ice
___Payments can be arranged
~NO charge for services
~Donations accepted
1istration does not constitute approval or endorsement of the drug
~use program by any State or county officer, employee or agency.
OVER
/5'- 6' ;l
Date
REGISTRATIOh .~ A DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM--SAN DIl.J COUNTY
NAME OF PROGRAMY~
ADDRESS / S-~ 6 "3D
Number and Street
~.....'
j."_ .01
, .
'~. ,
1" , ~ -J;;-;-: _ A
J--.__
.
~~
\ov
/~~~
Zip
8" 7.:r"
/ sD
City
/ '-3/
Phone
L:rt y} <;, t '-(9/0
JSiione
/~p.,.. _.fA. / r {7 'if:,
City Zip
PARENT ORGANIZATION NAME S ~_
ADDRESS '-f5"'I ~f~
Number and Street
tP ~\- c1 ~ ~ -<-\ "2. YY\ a... Y\
Program d ni strator
:'00 ~~~~~
Types/Numbers 0 persons
served annually
1.:=-1,:
i-I" :.:-' ,- L<,_
fr-I'{ ~_
~ . -~ ~J!" '-=2-C:uJ
)-y1" () r- :fru ~~ ~
C/ I J
~\
Description of Services (in one or two sentences)
. L~~/~
0('
You need to provide the remaining infonnation ONLY if you want to be
listed in the County of San Diego Directory of Drug Abuse Services:
Bilingual services available:
Yes No
IfVes, please specify language Sp'_
Accessible to disabled persons: _Yes XNo
Please check all that apply
~ Inpatient/Residential
D Outpatient
D Family Counsel ing
D Individual Counseling
D PC 1000 Diversion
D Group Counseling
D Community Consultation
D Training
Other
. -4..
D Crisis Intervention D Detox with Drug Support
D Youth Services-Ages D Methadone Maintenance
o Psychotherapy ~ Rehabll itation
D Education D Aftercare
0 Self-Hel p Group D Referral
0 Therapeutic Community D Job Counseling and Referra 1
D Detox Without Drug Support D Urinalysis
[J Crisis
Hot Line
JSiione
OVER / (/C:/2r.J
Services Limited To
e.g., Military, etc.
WEEKLY ACTIVITIES SCHEDULE
Alcohol .nd Drul Prolr.m
D.t e:
Weekly Activities Schedule
'le.se report only prOlr.m .ctivities
TIME:
5-7 '.111.
7-8 '.m.
8-9 '.m.
9-10 ..m.
10-1' ..m.
11-121.m.
12- 1 p. m.
1-2 p.m.
2-3 p.m.
3-~ p.lII.
11-5 p.lI.
5-6 p.tn.
5-7 p.lD.
7-8 p.,".
Comments:
, I
HONDAY 'TUESDAY IWEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY
I I I I I 0
Chapel/_J__________~---------~----------~---------~------____~Chapel.
Prayer , I , . I I : Prayel
Devotion~---------~---------~----------~---------~----------~evotiol
I 1 I . t 1 ;
I I . I I I
I I I I I b
Breakfns~----------~---------l----------r---------ir---------preakfa:
f . , . I
I . I I I
I . I I I .
I I. I... I I t Prayer
Ilouseh"ld Chores anll OutsIde ActIvltles-I----------'----------o
I . . : : at Ch tp
I I I I I
I I I I I I
Bible __1__________~---------4----------~---------~-Bible :Worshil
St ud yo. . . . Study : Servic(
I I t t I I
I I I I . I
I I , , I I
Personal :Studies & Outsid~ Actlivities Cohtinued---;----------.Worshi:
I I I . I Servict
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
LUNCH---~----------~---------~----------~---------~--LUNCH
: ~ I I :
I I I I .
I I I I .
· l- . Free
Outside Activities tontinue--~---------- ---------~
I t I , . Time
I I I , I
1 I I I :
Prayer--j---------ij---------1----------r---------,
I I I I .
I fit t
I , I I ,
I I I . I Free
ShO\'e r s-1---------;----------t---------.--------1 Ti me
I , I I I
, I I I I Free
Free____i_________~---------t---------~---------1-- .
Ti me I I I I I TIme
: I I I I
Dinner-~---------~---------~---------~---------t--Dinner
I I I I
I I I I
Prayer I Prayer I Prayer I Prayer I Prayer
at Churqh I at Churd1 at Churdl
Bible Street: Bible Church
Study Outreach,' Study Service
R t- rhllTrl,
\'orshiJ
Servicl
Free
: Time
,
o
: Free
: Time
.
.
: Free
Time
Free
Time
Dinner
Prayer
: at ChilI
.
.
: Church
: Servicl
.
o
Street : Church
Outreac~ Servicl
o
Prayer
Bible
Study
/.------"- I.>L!
/ ~ 0 .
Sweetwater Union High School District
ADMINISTRATION CENTER
1130 Fifth Avenue
Chula Visla, California 91911.2898
(819) 891.5500
Division of Planning and Facilities
April 1, 1992
~12C~/V~O
_~. '-1;;
Ms. Maryann Miller
City of Chula Vista
Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
PLANNING
Dear Ms. Miller:
Re: IS-92-30 - 3 North Second Avenue
The Sweetwater Union High School District does not object to the above
project. School fees will be required unless the project is found to be exempt
pursuant to the Community Care Laws. As you know, residential structures
have been required to pay fees to mitigate school costs.
Sincerely, :I
~.!I, (Jt//:/
~. :'/',.i, .J.,
<{ I/''''~
omas Silva
Assistant Director of Planning
TS/ml
/~/g:~
BOARD OF EOUCA noN
Cm.JLA VI :'A ELEMENTARY SCRe ..J DISTRICT
84 EAST "J" STREET . CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 . 619425.9600
EACH CHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH
JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, Ph.D.
lARRY CUNNINGHAM
SHARON GilES
PATRICKA.JUDD April 1, 1992
GREG R. SANDOYAl
x..c€.\\J~O
R .J
h.: ,
SUPERINTENDENT
.QHN F. YUGRIN, Ph.D.
~\-..\.
"
Ms. Maryann Miller
Environmental Review Dept.
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
p\.f\~~\~G
RE: Alcohol and Drug Rehabilitation Program
3 North Second Avenue / 15-92-30
Dear Ms. Miller:
Thank you for the
the Initial Study
above.
opportunity to review and comment on
for the 60 bed project referenced
since it appears no new construction is involved, no
school fees are required. Should this situation
change, school fees for residential development would
be due ($1.58/square foot: $.70 for Chula vista
Elementary School District, $.88 for Sweetwater. Fees
increase to $1.65/square foot on May 18, 1991).
Even though
District is
Certificate of
no fees appear to
still required to
Compliance.
the
the
be necessary,
sign off on
Sincerely,
~~~
Kate Shurson
Director of Planning & Facilities
KS:dp
ec: Tony Guzman
"
/S/Xr{
, -
r
~.
""-,,.,..,,:!;~:w. tt
.""_.,.'",,,
MAAC
tr..:JlOJECT
A MULTI-PURPOSE SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY
'~:..:,::,.,,_;;:~s '~:"
NOSOO'ROS
3 North Second Ave., Bldg. B, Chula Vista, CA 91910 (619) 426-4801
March 3, 1992
steve Griffin, Senior Planner
Chula Vista Planning Commission
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mr. Griffin:
It is our understanding that Victory Outreach is in the process
of applying for a Conditional Use Permit. At their request
we are writing to you to confirm that, in the event their permit
is issued, Nosotros would be willing to share six (6) parking
spaces on the property we are currently leasing.
Please feel free to contact us at anytime regarding this or
any other matter. Thank you.
Sincerely,
,
. . ~~ /
/) 1./- --, / ,,' /
. _ //#::- ~L-/ '..... ./__ </,"~#
-- -
Warren Garcia Stewart
Program Manager
NOSOTROS
tlGS :mrr
/5/?!7
~
~ f' /_ -...
~ d';~-, c4. 9.:Lo /02....
-':>
~I
t"",r, .,
."': J- /"l; ....;.., ., r,,... ~
. ,. '-'..J
PLANNING
~-".:/ ~ :
~ h<~~ r ~? ~' 3 ~~?Z ~u---Y-
~J~~/~/-<~(~/~'. ,_
b4" ~--~ Ju~--/ ~~r .v~JCM~~' ~
A, (Jg;u~t- - J4' ~_ --->-U~ ~---' ~~/ 7 ~
~ ~-.?;K.--u~ 4 --/~ d~'v ~~-J~
~~1/--r7 OVt-A~ .;V~ .~.A--<..~ ~ ~~Z~ ~L--L--'
~ ~...:;zL- --/~~ ~/~ --?~ ~A/L~'z/
a~4- tAlv "e." -#. U~ a"U--- ~~ d~~
~::7 ~ cL<VC/ ~zfi~~ ~ ~-ti ~~
~ ::I~~~~?7 ~ ~~ ~~U<:--'
AcAY ~~~~......./ .-u'J~ ~~) ~ ~-~
-~ry-
~~~
----- c.:v
) -,') -g ()
RECEIVED
.,..."..... "I!
L, r-" .... . I ~
PLANNINC:
Douglas D.Reid
Environmental Review Coorinator
r - - ..--
Chula Vista,CA 91912
April 10.1992
-.....'..,..~..,""',...:.. .~..' '.
1J.:d
RE: IS - 92 - 30
Victory Outreach Church
Drug & Alchol Rehab.- 3 N. 2nd Ave.,Chula Vista
We belive this proJect will have a significant effect on
the environment of the neighborhood and the City of Chula
Vista. We ask that an enviromental study be required for
this proJect.
In a letter from the applicant they stated they will be
providing services to addicts and their families. The first
question should be will the families be living there with
children attending the already crowed schools serving the
area? The most serious problem will be the security in the
neighborhood. Victory Outreach Church indicates their
interest is in working with addicts. Narcotic and durg
addicts have already shown a disregard for our laws,
themselves, their families and the co~munity. Most will have
been convicted or awaiting trial for narcotics or drug crimes
and other crimes such as theft, burglary, robbery; assult,
prostitution and various others. What if any security and or
supervision is provided for their charges and the surounding
neighborhood ?
The impact on the immediate neighborhood will be
devastating. The Chula Vista Police department is not
staffed to handle the influx in crime with their current
police officer staffing per capita. This organization will
not be contributing to the tax base, instead it will be a
drain on the public services of the City of Chula Vista.
We would like to point out that this organization has
shown a disregard for the zoning ordinance by placing their
sign and occuping the premisses before they were issued a
permit. How can the neighbors be assured they will not
disregard our laws and ordinances if they were issued a
permit? Victory Outreach Church professes to be a christian
organization yet they are willing to violate the laws that
have been established for the good and welfare of the City.
During the time Victory Outreach has been in the area we have
experienced a tremendous influx in crime which may be
coincedental, but we have had 2 Grand Thefts and 1 Petty
Theft totaling S 3,100.00 and 9 Burglaries totaling
IS 11,600.00.
J 5~(57
The neighborhood already has 2 chemicsl abuse
%acilities. To permit this additional, larger %acility is
going to alter the charcter of this neighborhood negativly
and permantley.
1% residents in the area preceive the City will not give
aome zoning protection they will begin to sell their homes
and leave the area, Thus causing a decline in property values
and a degradation in the peace, tranquility and security of
the neighborhood.
Please do not give this proJect a negative declaration
so the neighborhood can have a full and complete reveiw of
the impacts this proJect will have on our Community.
Sincerely,
/~~
Ted Bell, President
Kampgrounds Enterprises,Inc.
<,,,;'
_."';0
/~ )
/ L, _ C, f)
. / / L
~-:27-9 'J-.
-r; tJh~ 'ct ~ ~.' ..u....
.- -- --. -- -- - - - -- - - --------- ..--.- -------------------,--- -- -
--rn . \,' ~ I" , - . j.., -
-- . . !- f-~-ILJ-- yLcJl,u v~__OA.-cP-1..
- . .-~~ -:a.! - 11"8~_N~ Ilve_~1./ ~PCa.tH)-
C~I(l~O~..~~.-
~~. ~~. UJ 199/.::L.4'~-
-th.RA-n:J ~ ~ ~ ~ ci:i .-
~. Q ~ o..t ~ .----
lUP .~ ~~. o-t ~~
~ -thf; ~ f..4/J . aA...Of 'd ~::.._
~~cu~D..A.4~ _
() Q&o .. ...::Ch ~ e>1,~ ~~.
~ D.A.! ~~ ~~ 'v6 --
~a-u.- <&~ oJ ~. u . ..
__ .n_____V~. ~ _
-~---
--
Je-''-J /9 )
~ ',~ ,~ ' ' .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' t't ~ tJ ' Q\ ~ '
~ ~~ t~ ';:; ~ ~ ~ ,~ ,tJ, f"')t ',r~~' i,
~ ~,~ ~ :-,\,~ ~ ~~. ~, ".
~'" ~~'~~f f;~~r"', i !~!
\' f~" It: ~.,t~! i., I, i., '
~ ~,.~ .~ 'i. I\V~. . '.
f\ ~ h ~ -'. Z ..
. C r 1 ~ \ '<k r ~ ~1 I ',' ~
c, ~ t \r r r ~. " ~
; ,~~: '~,,' \
, ~~.
. ~ ~ I"~. ~
: .: ~~~~.
. ~~i ". · , ~~~
i : ~ ~
, i
I '
i , . I :~~', I., I i
, it! I I
i
t
~
I : '
Environmental Review Coordinator
POB 1087,
Chula Vista, Cal if. 92012
Apr 7, 1992
Dear Sir,
The Alcohol and Drug Rehabil itation Program on 3 North Second Avenue,
is not a good un of that land. Ny first thought is, is all the land
to be used for the one program or will part of it be used for another
project? It important to have the total land use designated before a
study is done. We have Pioneers on .C. street which is for recovering
alcohol ics. This neighborhood also has Frederica Manor which has a
complete care section. I think that is sufficient for this
neighborhood. To have drug and alcohol ic addicts and their dependents
above a KOA campground, where they can easily pick up left out camping
gear or case a working neighborhood to feed their habit, is putting
temptation out to them, while increasing opportunity for crime which
is already way up in Chula Vista. In addition I have pulled out from
Bayview, going north, at a rapid pace, only to have someone attempt to
pass me in the oncoming lane, in a bl ind, downhill curve! With those
speeds yOU don't want someone still groggy from drugs or alcohol or
the condition of their loved one trying to negotiate such a street.
Take a look at the turn lane by KOA and notice how the stripping is
worn away from cars going to fast to negotiate the curve so they just
straighten out the road. Builders have just put two sections of homes
in his area that sell for about a quarter of a mill ion dollars. Do
you think they want drugges and alcohol ics in there backyard?? I
think this is an illconveived plan. I think that are much better uses
for this land. Another builder could put quarter of million dollar
homes on it.
Sincerely,
~cI &//':;1.",,-
R.L. Batterton
1 -.
Chula Vista, Ca 91910
~- .....,
)J -'?;J
RECEIVED
PLANI\lII:
.
RECE\VEO
~~- ~ ~-- ~.~ ---- ~-- --0 .q~2.-. _____u____._
. ilPR 1 \-- , ~ ~
. .. u_ ~_____~___n_~ _.__~_____ ._~/~e:~__ ~
PLANNING
/J'J A A, /j-O a-- - --~-- -----~---
~U I' /'-'!. let:- /_ _ __ _ ____~ ________~_
~~~~ -~:; n
~ ~'t./ ;:::o-ztv ./?tL . _. _. . ....~ ~ ___ ~
//c~G-- /"l7- ~ ~d~._.
~~~ ~ 3 /2I-td a-x/ dk.. ~_ .
~;6- ~ ~~~~~
4~t/ ~4/~ ~A4 77d2Zz/L.6
~~~~L/:m:/zkkIJ.
~~~~.~~~
ftt /024.2/ k ~. /?'2-ff?U. /l~
.-/?71.dA~ .A7lev/ .~_ nn
~~~~.04r..
~ v"a ~_~Ce:.,. ~~_. .u.__
-t-~tcL ~./ -
-t t7//___..~ ~. .~ -
~~''- I dnz~, /~ft
~, tV' . -7t!fJ~-
tl ~ . n~t/A .._~ _ .
~. ~.l/~~~~~. ~
;j> 91--/
--------Z!JJt/~~&g~fMj~
~o-c-tt/~atia6~ __ ~__n
--#~~~ - --' --- --- -- /~----
-gu~~;:~ ~c_._._
~~ - ~~--~--
-A~Y;; ~t-~n~~~~,
_ _ /"') /- _ _ n _ __ _______
_~Jld /1?1c/ .-u --~
-7/l;J.~/ld~
3n - ------ -- ---- --- ------ - -
i lIeL
. . ._. _._ '_~ _u...___.___. ___ ... _.
-..-.-
Clut: f ~ a r;9/~ ------ __0_____ - - n
Iz _ L -' _ ___ mn _ _ _ d____ _ _ __u_
J ~~9 c;
i e-.--'" / -__/
Comments prepared for public hearing on June 2, 1995 re PCC-92-34
A. Protecting Character of the Neighborhood
1) Introduction "of a 60 bed drug and alcohol rehabilitation prograc compromises
the residential character of the neighborhood. This program ,rill add another
81 str~ngers (staff and participants) to tIus neig~borhood.
2) Five drug and alcohol treatcent prograns already exist in the neighborhood
plus a County Probation Office on Sweetwater which add hundreds of nor~esidents
to our neighborhood daily.
3) If these programs benefit the city, then they should be located throughout the city.
4) A vibrant residential neighborhood is one where the residents know each other, look
out for each 0ther and have a commitment to the well being of the neighborhood.
Bringing tpis program to the neighborhood weakens the residential bonds ,rithin our
neighborhood. It is as important to save the residential character of our older
neighborhoods as to develop new residential neighborhoods on the eost side.
B. Concerns About the Program
1) Program will include persons"ho have been recentl;" released fro," prison, referrals
from parole and probation officers, court co~citments, and gang ~embers.
2) At least 55% will fail according to the proposal's statistics. This ')Jeans th~t
over 30 drug addicts wil' experience relapse within our neighborhood.
3) Over one year, how many drug abusers will relapse as program failures are replaced
with other participants of which core than half wil' fail.
4) Will the failed participants attract gang mecbers or friends who are also drug
abusers to the neighborhood~
5) Attachment B of the proposal states that "potentially dangerous" personswill not
be accepted. What criteria ,rill be used to measure who is potentially dangerous?
The same attachment states that persons with "unusually violent behavior" will not
be accepted. Is a past record of SO"le violent behavior t: erefore acceptible in the residenj
C Cur Reco~mendations
1) Deny the conditional use permit.
2) As an alternative, we request a full environcental report under California
Environcental Quality Act. We believe that there are serious questions regarding the
security, econo:clic impact, noise, character of neighborhood, and quality of life that
should be addressed by a full enviroTh'1lental study.
3) Finally, we ask that any future zoning decisions involving our neighborhood be made
within the context of the same cocprehensive planning that is applied to new deveJopment
and that zoning decisions here not be made on an ad hoc basis. r~ny of the residents
have lived in the neighborhood for decades. They deserve at least the sa:cle thoughtful
planning as the people who Jive the the new developments.
It is sO:'letiCles fashiona"ble to belittle residents as nimnbies when they oppose a
a pro,j ect that ,riU change the residential character of their neighborhood.
(over)
/5-9t
Ni~nbies work hard to ke~p their neighborhoods a good place to live and raise
fa::lilies. l'Timnbies provide a tax base for Ioeal government.
By now, we should all know that protecting and preserving older core residentisl
neichborhoods is essential to tLe henl th of any cit~'. \Ve ask that the residential
en. r2cter of our neighborhood be preserved.
Carol,-n '=ruse
Ghula Vista, GA
) >~ / 7
Victory Outreach Conditional Use Permit 6/2/92
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. I have come to speak to you as a
representative of very concerned citizens of North Chula Vista. We wish to maintain
the security, character, and qual ity of 1 ife in this area of Chula Vista. I should
first, 1 ike to point out that through the wisdom of the City Counsel, several groups of
homes, valued at over one quarter of a mill ion dollars each, have been put in, where
previously detrimental projects were sought out. Thes~{bro~t income to the land
owners, revenues to the city and schools and maintained the character of the
neighborhood.
Now _ we have a ..... good cause seeKing out land in a Very bad location, simi lar to
the Transitional Housing or Homeless social service sought out recently. We already
have six social services in our small area. We think we have done our fair share. Now
we are asked to house 60 drug addicts. Since over 50/. in this program remain addicts,
they will need money to support their habit, which can mean bUrglary to the nearest
houses or condominiums, theft from open garages, recreational vechicles or camp sights
at KOA, robbery and assault of people I iving here or the businesses that are near,
prostitution on the streeets and who knows what else. How smart is it to tempt
criminals with direct access to the KOA campground, or a quiet neighborhood with many
people away from their homes and condominiums, working.
Since many in the program Come from gangs
members are 1 iving and try to visit them.
gangs. Other gangs could also come for
the members may find out where their former
They may try to convert them bacK to the
hostile visits.
The previous facil ity was a private hospital for pSYChiatric treatment. It was quiet.
It was not for criminials seeking rehabil itation. It is not the same' There is now a
12 bed residential facil ity for alcohol ics. This is a far cry from a 60 bed unit for
drug addicts who may return to their old ways. The 12 bed facility has already caused
many problems in the area. The neighbors living the closest are stared at day or
night, in their house, in their yard, in their car, comming or going. People wander
off the facil ity and through the neighborhood. Please note the letter from the KOA on
the tremendous increase in crime.
The Cal ifornia Adminsitrative Code, Title 9, See 10564 outl ines qual ifications for the
staff and facil ity administrator. Among the qual ifications, counselors, including
volunteers, 'shall be competent to provide the service necessary as described in the
plan of operation'. This is unlike federal or state 1 icensing which means required
courses must be taken and tests passed. How will these volunteers evaluate the street
people they bring into the facil ity for their history of violence, mental disorders,
sex offenders, and/or severe medical disorders? If they have not been caught there may
be no record. Being under the influence of drugs, they may not know themselves, what
a 11 they have done.
Since the volunteers and counselors can be and are former graduates the question is
what is a rehabil itated drug addict? Is it acceptance of what he has done was wrong
and a promise to improve. Is it being clean for a month or two months or 3 months.
How is the graduate now able to pol ice his former buddies and his own behavior? How
will the graduates, 5 counselors and one security man keep track of 60, or 30 or even
15 inmates for the 12 hour period of 6 PM to 6 AM.
To sell the property in th i s area it is requ i red to tell the prospect i ve buyer there is
a drug addict rehabil itation center in his own prospective back yard. Obviously that
would have a negative affect on the property values. It certinly would not have the
same affect as saying yOU have the La Jolla Beach and Tennis Club in YOUr own
/ l-::- ,! X/
/ ..
prospective bacK yard.
The Findings from the Ci ty say that the general well being of the communi ty wi 11 be
accomplished in that there is an existing, under utilized facility in place and the
service to be provided by Victory Outreach will contribute to the community by
assisting in the rehabil itation of drug and alcohol users. There are many other far
better uses for this facil ity that will do more for the neighborhood and the city of
Chula Vista. Such uses will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general
welfare of children and adults residing in the neighborhood. At the Planning
Commission Meeting one suggestion was made that they should have a ranch, away from
all. A Spokesman for Victory Outreach said that is an excellent idea. In fact they
have one near Roy Roger's Ranch in Apple Valley.
Having vital issues to discuss so soon after the Planning Commission's meeting, at 4 PM
on an Election Day automatically severely restricts the attendance of the workng people
in the neighborhood, the ones most affected by this situation. Hence the petitions
show from those that were home and may not be able to attend.
The rules and regulations laid down for the Conditional Permit say any complaints will
be dealth with satisfactorly, however there are no 1 ines of complaint and review by
Victory Outreach, The City and the Neighborhood. The El Cajon Victory Outreach, which
is one of the ones to be consol idated into the larger Chula Vista one has many
complaints from the neighborhood about noise according to the Negative Declaration
Report. How will this affect visitors to San Diego in the KOA Campground and the KOA's
business. How will it affect the neighborhood? Part of the conditions for the permit
involve conditions of the property building and grounds. Yet no I ines of
accountability have been set up to monitor and/or take action on these. Please note
that these conditions, if violated, could terminate this 60 bed drug addict
rehabi 1 i tat i on un i to
Other questions raised by the Negative Declaration is since the east fence is
unacceptable by the Fire Dept, how does its removal affect accessability to the KOA
campground? Also it stated that North Second Ave is designated Class II Collector.
Sufficient Dedication may be required to meet the half-width standards of said
Dedication. What does this mean? Will it widen Second Ave? Whose property will it
take? How will that impact traffic which is now well over the 30 MPH speed limit.
For the reasons cited above we urge you to vote against this proposal. There are
serious detrimental conditions set up to the Environment, to the citizens, and to the
City of Chula Vista.
./-';9
,
r
PRESENTATION IN OPPOSITION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PUBLIC HEARING: PCC-92-34
PROJECT NAME: Victory Homes of San Diego
PROJECT LOCATION: 3 North Second Avenue, Chula Vista
PROJECT APPLICANT: Victory Outreach
590 Fir Street, San Diego
SPEAKING ON BEHALF
OF THOSE OPPOSED:
Charles Bradley
29 Second Avenue, Chula Vista
THE NEIGHBORHOOD
The Second Avenue nieghborhood is an important entryway to
residential "Old Chula Vista" with it's famous and
historical Orchard Homes, it's meticulously landscaped
lots, and it's serene but unimposing senior community.
I don't own one, but I've heard that nearby, there are
homes worth a quarter-of-a-million dollars and more.
And there are trees - beautiful trees. Lots of them.
Chula Vista is "The City of Trees". I like to leave the
curtains open and look at them.
At Christmas time people come from allover to see the
bright enchantment at "Christmas Circle" or turn down
"E'I Street to "Candy Cane Lane". Families come. You can
see them park ~heir mini-vans and amble down the street in
a tight little gaggle, gawking at the blinking decorations
that the neighbors have so pridefully put up.
It's a peaceful neighborhood. The kind of place where
you'd like tr raise your kids. There are lots of those
too. Leti and I have two (a seven year old boy and a four
year old girl). They're not much for watching trees, but
they love to play in our front yard with Kevin and Deanna
(ages one and four) from across the street and Adrian and
little Joey (ages five and seven) from next door.
Sometimes Patrick comeS over on his bicycle (he's a big
lO-year-old from two doors down). Diagonally across from
us are a 7 and ll-year-old brother and sister. I used to
see Daniel play basketball out front with his scouting
friends. And sort of kitty-cornered there's a bunch of
young teenage girls that like to roller skate on the
sidewalk.
.-/
/'7 - /tJ CJ
SUCCESS, FAILURE AND OPPORTUNITY
Gary Penovich, an administrative director for Victory says
that about 31 out of 100 who start the program stay off
drugs.* To our families that means that for every hundred
addicts introduced to our neighborhood, sixty-nine will
revert to a criminal lifestyle that threatens the very
essence of our lives.
A Policeman once told me that "opportunity makes the
crime". He explained that sometimes even people who
aren't "bad", when given the opportunity, may commit a
crime. When some unvictorious addict fails the program
does he conveniently remember the "house on the hill" and
it's lovely surrounding neighborhood? When the pusher
becomes aware do our children become the target of his
diabolical enterprize? When we provide an opportunity for
Victory do we invite defeat through some unthinkable
sacrifice?
THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There are those who cry "Nimby, Nimby, Nimby" - reminding
me of a childhood phrase pertaining to weapons and
projectiles that my father taught me (and that your father
or mother probably taught you) to protect us from the
taunts of others who didn't understand our values.
There are already six agencies catering to thousands of
criminals, alcoholics and drug addicts within easy walking
distance from our doorsteps. The cumulative effect of yet
another agency of this type in our area is adverse to the
environment. The incremental effects of this project are
more than considerable when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects.
* rIDe t.Ile 72% that complete the program rlaLionwlde, 43% of
the residents remain drug-free" TI~ES, April 22,1989.
CALCULATION: 72% X 43% = 30.96%
;c;:- / () /
HOSPITALITY AND HISTORY
It's true, Chula Vista hospitality welcomes strangers to
it's businesses and neighborhoods. The Christmas
attraction is an important draw for yule tide gift-givers.
Plaza Bonita, less than a mile from Vista Hill, is a
year-round shopping attraction. The marina developments
have put Chula Vista on the map for family fun and bays ide
recreation. We have a beautiful parks and summertime
concerts to stimulate musical appreciation in a fabulous
outdoor setting. "Old Chula Vista" and it's Orchard homes
are a I'must see'l on tour lines for t}lose who appreciate
the cultural and historical development of the South Bay.
The Vista Hill building itself is an Historical Site and
recognized by the Historical Site Board for the City of
Chula Vista. Constructed in 1913 the "Bulmer House" was
considered one of the finest in the county.
INCREASED CRIME
But the customers and guests we invite to share in these
assets are qualitatively different in terms family
orientation, revenue generation and moral character than
is the criminally oriented and/or gang affilliated drug
addicted stranger who carries within him the power to
desicrate our neighborhoods, burden our economy, and
jeopardize our safety.
Furthermore, this exposure extends beyond the addict to
the countless array of contacts, connections, cohorts,
consorts, suppliers, partners, pushers and "homies" with
whom the addict intercourses. An increase in crime is the
probable result.
NIGHTWATCH
Victory has offered one, perhaps two, night counsellors to
provide non-professional security at the facility. Would
this measure guarantee the integrity of its neighbors'
property? Would this or could any measure of security
-professional or otherwise- guarantee the safety or the
families in the area. If someone wanted to leave Vista
Hill.. .Could he?
,
J~/~2
ADVERSE EFFECT ON HUMAN BEINGS
Could the environmental effects of this project cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
Yes.
Leti and I lived and hid and saved in National City for
eleven years until we had enough to leave "gangland"
behind. We were physically, materially and emotionally
damaged by drug and alcohol crazed gangsters, hoodlums and
misfits who vandalized our property, stole our cars, set
fire to our van, robbed our home, screamed obscenities in
the night and tormented us until we finally escaped in
1990. During that time we kept our doors locked, our
curtains drawn. My wife developed Graves Disease - a
stress related syndrome brought about by the tension and
stress of living in fear. Our insurance rates soared but
we found strength in our love. We dreamed of having a
safe home on a quiet residential street with respectable
neighbors. Maybe some trees. Peaceful trees.
We are the living proof of nice people trying to make it.
We are excercising our right to the American Dream by
working hard, maintaining family values and investing in
the future. We are dedicated to providing a wholesome and
nurturing environment for our children.
ECONOMICS AND EMPLOYMENT
Victory offers little or nothing to the economy of Chula
Vista. The small staff of ten is presumably volunteer.
The residents wj.II seek contributions for work in tile area
exacerbating an already high unemployment staListic.
State Unemployment Insurance taxes will not be paid.
Neither residents nor vouluteer staff will generate
fH::'l'SOna..} income tax reverllH"S. ResidenLoS w'ill nor bp
customers in Chula Vista stores.
On the contrary, Lhe best poLential C01' this u.se apj}eaI'S
to carr's with it an increased bur-den 1.0 t~he city in terms
of Pol ice, F.i ce arl(l Enlergen('y Ser'\' iCt,~::> i-l[ld ;1 ('()I.\curnl LatlL
increased potential civic 1 iability
IS CONDITIONAL USE A BENEFIT
]n ordeT' 1.0 appro\.'e :'l COlldit,ioria] USE.' must the C'OUlle il
find all uvenl11 beneCiL to th(' ('it;'.' To its Citizenry?
hhu uear's the burden of proof to show that the impact on
Lhc eny j t'onment j:,.; an acceptable risk?
/~c:;" / (}.3
ALTEl/NATI\'E LSES
What uses would be acceptable to Chula Vista?
Certainly those uses which allow a substantial benefit to
the community would qualify. Uses that when weighed
against the potential risks would contribute a return to
the city in general and to the neighborhood in particular.
Some suggested uses might include:
Secondary Care Center,
Birthing Center,
Ilandicapped Learfling Center",
Hospice,
Convalescant Center,
Retirement Center,
Library,
Historical Center,
Day Care Center,
Community Center.
Use specific zoning could serve to forestall future
serious publ ic controversy ,,"'hi Ie assur lng communi t)'-
involvement and support of a valuable lleigllbol"hood
resource.
S \:~iHA RY
Victory Outreach is wroIlg for our neighhcrhood.
/
In the weeks sirlce discovering Victory's pJ_an I have
reinforced in m~ mind that 1, fortunately, live jrl a
neighborhood which is close knit and shares parallel
values emphasizing family and community. I've learned
that no Dele I kno~ has a need for Victory's Se~vices.
ThE~ risk to lc)cal fa:Jlilies of having sixty h&l'd-core, gang
affilliated, ex-offender, cult-like drug addicts under a
lay program which is not accountable to federal, state,
counLy, or municipal regulation, oversight, licenture, or'
funding far outweighs the potential benefit to individual
members. The promoter's stated inflated "success rate" of
43 percent is not re-assuring. It is, in fact, misleading.
The program will attract undesirables into our city,
potentially increasing crime, adversely effect the city
economy and bring a strong potential for adverse effect on
human bE'ings.
We, therefore, request that the conditional use permit for
a drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery center be
dE'nied.
/'
/> j {nl
~
...--
j};?
DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
RECEIVED
DATE:
May 6, 1992
FROM:
captain Bourgeois rf1f..
Barbara Brookover, Sr. Crime Analyst
PLANI~I~JC"
TO:
SUBJECT:
Response to Proposal for Victory outreach
I reviewed the proposal for the Victory Outreach
Rehabilitation Center at 3 North Second Avenue, Chula
vista. To obtain a general idea of crime in the area
surrounding the proposed site, a 0.2 mile radius search
was conducted from the location for the period November 1,
1991 through May 1, 1992.
There were not many incidents within the radius searched:
7 arrests (1 at 3 North Second, a 243A PC)
11 crimes
7 field interviews
2 parolees residing wi thin the radius area (1 at 3 N.
Second)
The crime statistics do not show a problem in the area
that might be accelerated by the placement of the Victory
Outreach Center. If there is additional information that
I can provide that might be of assistance, please let me
know.
City of Chula vista
/ ~ . ~
[:> -/C<~,
,,[~ )5:'~
28
MAYOR NADER:
I wcW.d like to take this opportunity to eOOorllEl the work of Victory
OUtreach .
It has been my cbservation fran first hand experience that such Christ
centered ministries as Victory OUtreach minister to the real spiritual
needs of people where other programs fail.
As the oft criticized Vice President ().Jayle has all1.Xled, the prctllems
of todays world are spiri~ and !II:lral in nature and he is absolutely
right.
Every wanan, man and child is b:lm with a spiritual need that unfortu- \
nate1y many have thcd1ht Can be filled with alO()\'x)l, druqs and gangs.
IT CAN'T.
Please give Victory OUtreach the opportunity to seJ:ve this City as I
Icnow i~ can.. I spoke recently with Police capt. Askergnlen of the
Escaldi.do PoliceeDepart1tent and he gave me a glowing endorsement of
Victory OUtreach. 'n1ey have been of inestimable value in relatmI to
and dealing with the gan;s and druq users in that city.
In hope of a favorable respcooe to victoty OUtreach; I remain
- A-
.. -
CHUIA VISTA, CAr. 91911
-<;~~ / (~(,
~
THE TRIWEST GROUP
Financial Services
Asset Management
Investment Brokerage
27 May 1992
)' k j I~'r'\ '~"r,' ....\.
. '-' . , ,t; I, ,
'r---~~ co ~I
"' ~"
;,i' t 11
~'.. 28. J~!
I L~, ,-r.l 1.../ I
~-- .';--:.-__LL..2.'.,,;:'t.~
Mayor Tim Nader
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Tim:
I am writing you at this time because I need your help for
a very important cause. Coming before the City Council
next week, Victory Outreach Church is applying for a
conditional use permit to allow a 60 bed, substance-abuse
rehabilitation and recovery center at 3 North Avenue.
As you know, MAAC project's Nosotros Program occupies a
small part of the existing facility.
First of all, the environmental review team and the
planning staff conducted an Initial Study, IS-92-l0, of
J?otential environmental impacts associated with the
~plementation of the project. Based on the study, there
would be no significant environmental impacts and
recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on
IS-92-l0.
Second, the Planning Commission, on May 13, 1992 gave an
affirmative approval of 5-2 to recommend the granting of
the conditional use permit for a period of 1 year with
certain contingencies.
Thirdly, Victory Outreach Church will eliminate the
vagrancy problem that now exists due to the homeless
people staying on the property. This should restore the
neighborhoods to safety once again.
Lastly, as
between the
can finally
vacant site.
the Commercial Broker handling the lease
landlord and Victory Outreach, I believe we
see a compatible use to this under-utilized,
Thank you for your support
Rre?~Y rs,
J 6t-~~ en'1-' 0 CCIM
President
Commercial-Investment Realtor
[(BID Individual Member
1447 Third Avenue, Sune G
Chula Vista, CA 91911 . Oflice: (619) 425.3917
J.</)(J '/
FAX: (619) 426.2144
OPEN
IHREIMCNIH
SAN DIEGO PROBATION DEPA~NT 5 DAYS 600
Sweetwater Road
Criminals/Felons
BA YSIDE ALANO 7 DAYS 900
345 ESt.
AlcoholicslDrug Users
MAAC NOSOTROS GROUP 7 DAYS 12
3 N Second Av. Live-in
A1coholicsIDrug Users
AA PIONEERS CLUB 7 DAYS 1000
279 CST.
Alcoholics
SOUTH BAY DRUG ABUSE rCES 7 DAYS 600
SOUTH BAY NEIGHBORHOOD COVERY CENTER
314 Parkway
AlcoholicslDrug Users
MAAC HERMANOS LATINOS GROUP 7 DAYS 1200
45 Third Av.
Drunk Driving School
)_'7~/{J If
.. -<<~-'.
< .,: '-. ;'-T:::'-~~~CT~?:;:~&:r: " .._--~,;~.~~:~. ':f~~~~~8F~:~;"
The Right Step Sponsors Victory
Outreac.h Rehabilitation Instftute
Victory Outreach Is a non-proRt drug prevention
and rehabilitation program. It was established in
this area In August of 1985.
Executive Director. Tony GJzman of Victory
Outreach In 5an Diego saw a need for expansion.
The program not only needed to reach delinquent
youth. but the hard core drug addict and alcohol-
Ics as well. to offer them a different and lasting
life style outside of drug dependency.
Approac.h
Victory Outreach. located In San Diego. CA.,
maintaIns four Rehabilitations Homes for lndtvtdu-
ai, who are e.xper1endng behavIoral problems
stemming from substance abuse. The homes
serve a two fold purpose for the substance
abuser. It Is a detoxlnc.atlon and rehabllltatlon
component of Victory Outreach Mlnlstrtes. In the
detoxification phase we do not offer any type of
synthetic drugs. The solution Victory Outreach
offers \s not a partial one, repladng one drug wtth
another I but ls a whole solutton which Is found In
a spiritual experience. while the Individual Is a
resident of the Victory Outreach Men's Home he
Is trained by a program of self-dlsdpllne and
structure. He and his famIly are encourage to
become acttvety Involved In any of the programs
that the home ollers, e.g.. family counseling,
prison visitation and home functions. They are
also encourage to attend speaking engagements
on the subject of drug abuse at schools and civic
meetings. VVhlle partldpatlng In these activities.
the Individual and his family are also In the
process of being resodallzed Into the community.
Victory Outreach works not only with the sub--
stance abuser. but with the famlty as well.
Population Served
We serve the Greater San Diego County, and
surrounding areas. It is the polley of VIctory
Outreach to admit and treat all residents without
regard to race, color or national or1gln. The same
requirements for admlsslon are assigned within
the program w'thout regard to race. color or
national origin.
,,""
..:.:,..,::.:.:-,.:
.;:..:."
;:~<~{,.
~lll-llr
Servkes Offered
1. Residential: The substance abuser in need of
detoxlRc.atlon and rehabilitation resides at Victory
Q~r~ch t'C)r:!}~ for a period on nine to twelve
a>C>J1!!l~. The length of time Is determined upon
how the Individual responds to the program. The
Individual Is encouraged to stay at the home
untll such time as the director feels he Is ready to
lcave. The home Is administered by a group of
dergymen and pare.professlonals on a non-profit
basis.
2. Drug Prevention Crusade: D~ preventlon
~lIIes are h~ld once per week. ey are free and
open to the public. By these ausad"". we
Introduce our concepts or rehabilitation to the
local community, and UnlRed School District In a
corporate elfort to stop gangs and drugs.
Future Plans For Vlc.tory Outreach
Rehabmtatton institute,
Purpose of InstlMe, Educate and train Individuals
for directorship and leadership In running and
maintaining rehab fadl~les. Scope of project to
train and prepare leaders In rehablllta~on of drug
addicts. CandIdates would come from around the
world for training In the rehabilitation process.
and returned to there prospecttve countries to
train others and to establish rehabllltatlon centers.
The directors would also be trained with the
vision of Impacting there clty and there county.
ProJec.ted Costs:
72.000
8,400
60,000
92.000
8.500
Rents
Utilities
Vehicles
Salaries
Traln aids and equipment
240,900
Totals
FundIng Sourc.es
Victory has no cost for services rendered to indi-
vIduals admitted to the VIctory Outreach Rehabili-
tation Program. It any more Information Is desired
or needed. please feel to contact at
(619) 237.{)675
l~'/ () ?
^
.~~'
.--.::>- "_ _...";Il'J':.
q. I'af! II/S:11UrUi\Y. ^1'H1I1l. IYlN
'I uon'tthink it takes" uope nrod to reach adoDC nend, hut it Slire helps.'
Faith Helps
Ex-Addicts
Reach Out
lJy Sl1^WS MMmF.SMITII.
l'i."..,SI~1I Wrif..r
J..lll;e Smllh r.huckled a.~ he
H'lllcllI1Jrr('u the nlan whu, tlllO
)ears 310, led hi," to Vielory
OlllTcaeh, lhe fundamcnllllAl
Chri,tlan dwreh thal helped him
hr".:Ik hlA IG_year_old hcroin ad-
',h';li1)l1 "hal lnan wn his drUB
aUrrhN
"My hcrom connctUoll kne"
rlhoul VicllJry Oulruch, and he
broughl 1\'1(' here, I , ' We went in
lhlollllh lhe hont door ,nt! he went
l>ullhe ilnclt and Ielt me lhere,"
S".i1ht.:lid. "GoiJllliniMurtl lOTTle,
".", I Colu\'rolhatnll;hl,"
Smith el!ler<<J lhl! VicLory Oul.
re'lch rehabillllUon prosram Ind.
lifter 13 month., he d~lulcd hll
life 1.0 helpln, olhen lhroulh the
,,utreach.
Or.uh:'1 F.ur 1I""u
Slnlth Is uow . llpokcsman for
Victory Olllruch church In LOlan
IIcl~hU, a nomknornloalional rt.
h~hllitaUon mhll8lry lh.t opcralu
rourUve.ln homul" lhecounly for
h~rtklled san8 ml'lllbcrll, 0111:(11101-
1<;1 JniJ drUB .dllle'.', M Jhe
l,nrnl'~_.ill~.:I\I't1ln remole rOlrlll of
l,11kcsitle alld El Ca)on. .1Ild In
Erlcallto .nd Locan 1Ir1lh~-Lhl'
rl"lIlde'1l1 Inllnw alrld rulu dr-
.inlltd to hrlp lhl'm "rdlllq:rall'''
Illlo.ocL!:'I)'.
, Vlelory Oulrl'uh wall rOUI"ltS\
,hy SOlin)' Ar[ll;uinr.oTll, ~ IOUlll'r
I [11;111'1 member .nd,lrlllll a1Ju~l'r ..:ho ;
, ',('..;to lhl' plOg.am III hil'l F.allll.o3 \
^"Sdcshome 21 yt'ullago.ll hI'S I
c_r~nd('d lo Ion" mure Lh;'!l1 50
'1IIlrdlellh.lHI'I\aIC.8I1JtlQl\Wi"I'~I'
t.lemo.llollandandAftlcn.ny\he
.."d or Ihl' yea., il hnpell tv hav.
r hurchl'~ In Dra."l ami EllSlar ,
~ln'lh,"liJ
l';ar:h dllY Oulreach rTtoJ;r;,!nl
I'mUtU, th('IlL,r1yt'~ lonn..r a,I,
JKls, walk thl' wonL sl'clloll~ tlr
L,)wn In lIurch of IUlIt loub One.
On-(llll', lht'y talk with lodety'.
t~,taw'y:\, ~lvlnBlh('m lttltlmonlt's
ollh('ir own rrh;'!billLlUon_
"ooa)', OUhtlK:h ml'rnueu alld
lI11j'purtl'fI will marth throu,h
dluvn\own SIlII l)iellu 10 show lht
cummunlly that lhtlr prollT:lm.
whlthrl!'lll's heavily on lheir Chlls-
. 1i~11 rl'lI~lous bdlffll, ean luake a
.1,r1f"l'I'IlU
~Wt work ...llh lIrulI .,lllleU,
prolllUult'1 lIntl Inl1~ IIll:llll>er!\.
l"l!\irnlt, UUJ!lt' wilh a "rln,lll~\
h~c"r.rnund," Smllh ulu_ "We II!:('I
thl'''' .""." Irt.'" lhcoircnvlrClIlln('nL
"..d tr;"ch tht:U1 talle ChllMlnll
prlndple.. "he1 comc In b<<1l11~ rUJI'.. .....c.(.'Ynm..""ucl'ptf.11
lhf'y're hurlilll and Und, they're over o1nd over and. over, , . bul
lick or lhelr \I e .t,le. The rea~ thcy've bl'l'n dolnl an ellct'lhml
~ can relale to Ihenl I. beeause...e )ob," W e;aid.
catrll' horu thal bld'!l:roUlllI, rrom ~No cone an milch thrLr auc:ce..
lht Jlulor on down, We dml't evcr rale," ,:lId tuanlo Jlml'nn, a rl'
forlel where we came from anu role asenl wllh lhe Dc:parlmenl 01
who Wt left brhlnd, We h~vl' 10 go Corrections In EI CaJon who has
bi'C~.ndfl':Ithlhoaeproflle," rererred paroleulo Vklory Out.
Ton, Gut"""n, lhl!, ralltor who rrlch. .
foum.lcd SlIn DlelJo', Vlttory Ovt- '111c1 Ulle nlble IhJJy 'lId IOl or
rl',ch I" 1!)'H, aSrtt'd."1 don't lhlnk praytr all principal meanl or deal.
Iltake..a dope fiend 10 rueh II dope lug ....Ilh chao,lul behavior. ' ,
lll'nd, bul II sure hC'lp.... Gutman they roa"e no bono Oat lhal II
nld he W;I.' 311 :lCklicl ...h(l lrit,l . Ihtlr ('Irimary trealmtnl." Jlmcne;z
I'VI'I, urllg he cultlll ~cl hll h;'1I1,ls sail!. "nut 1'111 nol. Incline\.! to
on qu~lkm lbtm, Ilyen (helr oul-
"JI'~U1 filled the I'mpUllCn I was tonle. Where olher procrarn. JUlve
lrylng lolill with drulr.," he,,,itJ. r;lllcu rtIlM'r.bI7. lhne IUY' Ire
Fo....d s.. DI..r."l'h ballln, .&10 In my book."
Afler he ....AS 1lcl'll';d by a Vlclory 43" 51., Off 01'111.
OutTe:l~h church In San nl'rllDrul. / or the '72~ lh.l complete the
no, Guzm~1l fU'JIIllt'd ~ht: Sau Ole~o ;' I"Tul!:ro.n\ l1~lIollWidl', 13" or !.he
br.m:h 10 help oth~r addlc~ Illllhc / rellidf'nlll remain drUB' hl'e, .aid
emplil>(:t.!I il1lhtir IiVtll. "I Wal\l La I. Gar, Pl!'novlch. admlniltrall'l' dl-
Iry lo reach lhe pt'Qflh: no ftlU: clse rtclor lor rellabllltaUon M!f1'Ic", at
wanll to rcach and po.,,~bly can't Victory Oulreach col"f'Urlle hl!'ad.
reach. Our philOllOJlhy Is. 'Ur:Jch, I qU:lricrt lit La rUenLe. An e,Urnat-
ICllch aut! Irain: We 'ea~h lhl'rn, ~d 20~ of San Olelo', rcsidenta
lcach them a ncw life alld troln I!:r<< lO') be couH-cornmltlcd to
llll'm (0 80 "ack and leach olhen," Vlelory OUtre.ch In .11ernaUve
ht IIld. oll'nclng or conditio'" of pr
l..con M,,(lrt, 21. a former Cr~1! Uon,Sll\ithuld.
BIng nlembcr 11\d "creek" ludicI, Ronald Dobo, lupl'r,l.in4 attor.
b<'came I cO\lf\lldor III onc of the ney ror lhe p\lblle delemler s oUlce
homl'S .lter lhl' flrusram ehanfled ill El <:i.lon. 531d Id. omc. ute.
hill lite. "I lritdllll lhe worldly drug Victory QuO,tach on I.t.!c.by.
flro,rarnfl-NArt'.OUCS ^lKInymou~. can basi.. "We will 001 ntorn.
Ah:oholica Anon,mous' CHASI1 mend II u"1c~ a prnon w.nlllo '0
jCotllrllunilY Ih'source!l Ind &U Ihere. If lhey're com'ortat:le with
lIelp Inc_I, 5l'<:ond CI)ill\ce-l .1. II. we've found itdoo. hllV'IIkc.~U
"'-'Y' ""l'nll.ack l\llhe !lann~ Lhj"g, ..,. The)' ()cllland a rul, 101,1
It ....'}\I~IIIUl'erlK:I.1 hcalllll;,. . ., t:Olnrl\i,llIlenl In lollll abl;hne1tcc,
Corl he~l~ \he 1',.~lt'm," N<JOfI' &ai\J, and aulmlUulc I ~1l10Ul alllllon lor
VIctor, Olllrcllch hall heCt'l crlti. lhl' U!II' of dru" alld IIlcohol," Uobo
ti:r;('u by "1I1le. inlhe toullly prulo,). nil!.
llllll .lrll~rlmel\t ueuuu' illll ullll. t;"nthlOU/. It.... r"l~ 01
I'Cllllf'fl. IJul O\lllc.t.h urnd"l., lI.hl "HI" all'll"'1I\'l'ilI1l1'11I o,g.,,,I,,:J by
~h;LI, u"lll 1I'(-c"lly, Lhry I~c"r,llhr lht" rl'~i,ICllU or Ihl' h(llllrll 10
1\1"""'Y kr Ih:r"~"'Il- Nt'vrrthl'lr~, M" rl II~ ,]:I;ly Itll<"t~IIOIllI. "0'
t>lhn r.,,,,,1 V alltl ,:o","."....ty uH,. l,~ 'I II I "1'h Ill,,"l
..;.I~~ay'"d''''YOIlI'C,...hi"~j,,r.''' ,I.,)" ",;o'CI,"3 n (' .
I' [. ';UI,rll.r'jl -. SI"I'," i,l;\lI a\ll'lIlpl t(l ~aln C"'flt'.
arlll~h~l"l U(Ii,.. ('ael'lItiv(' ,lin'CLM 1I11rl' l'nd ra.ie 'Ulll.!' (or Ihdr
Ilr lhr 0,'11 i... Stil\i"Il, ~.li,l. "'!'hry'lc Ilror:r;lIn.
very rdllli,~,~, 11"01 fur IhulIe '"'too The l!larch. which I.>tlln' "l 10
can ten!,,,,,.1 10 II1"t amI lic ht'II","1 'Ull. III rrolll (I' 1,,-,l\1'1' hC:uhl'Lllrleu
hy I1Ult, 1 Ih;ll" Ifll '.:l)Il"'~II"L all Uroa<l""ay het"'c('lI lUll allll
'n'ey've t,{,1'1l :11M to heir> 1I\.'(oplr. I I~.lh ~Irret.-, will pHltel'lllJl'Iuth 011
dlul\'l Ulillk cUIIM 101' hdl'l',l 11th Strcct, 'VC$t 011 ).In.t,rl Slrl'tl
!iartl.('or.., milltU('.ar,('il IIl'win.vl- IIl1d rIOlllh un Ktllllcr,I'II,llllF: Althe
rljrl~, pl'lll'[(' ....ho hHC h~u Il r::ulld 1':I1II>;1I1:I.\I'ro :-t,lIhl:l ";uk lIe:l'
2Q.l"JIJ. ,r,}fClu,Uctiotl_" :;{'al'urt VIII"BI'. ^ rc~\iVlI IS
Orlir. brlil'vcS Ule proll'ri'm \!\ .a 1,10I11I11',J in lht r;,ull .llcr lht
lUCCI'S.! in flart bttiU$e u-adUlctll much, .
./
ls --jl ()
"'1'111. Is ~hc r"lIt l,me ,",("VI' I:,,,'r
pub!>c lu j\\llIh "IL;'!1 ",1"1'1' J"IIlJ:."
niLl C.:Irl"~ AI;l1lit~ :\ \'iclor.,. Out.
rC:lch l!l(llIucr .,,<1 thc f..pl\(r
"hcruln {'llllllcctk'Il" who lJr"i'r.H
SInith 10 lhe I're(r:J1lI t"u ,ells
,'0, Shortly alterwAnl. AIIIIl'Z .,L~o
bl'cl)lIl~ coullnlllcd lu worklllJ ""llh
lhtoulreach.
"Wc'rc rtOclah"i", IQ Ihe ..t.v
lhat....e ...allllO rl'ach ~h("l' 1'l't'I'lO:
':Id I.>rj"B thcm 1..10 soell'll ,a~
rrodl.lcUvl' c1Ur:en.:' ^I~nl:r. 'i"l
M\Ve jll:llI on tlpCmnr: It.eVI'II nlOl_1'
Ihulfl(,lIllhrotllthQU~'lhl' co,,"nUI'"
Iy, "here thl!'tt:'s "al'll vlulcllC<:',
.,..hell' there', dlug ."wltts, &1'"
whue whl'r.lhere', \rollblt."
";.,;-.;',,,,-,.
~'J,:}":f.'t" -
Victory Outreach tells those
in hell a habit can be licked
II)' .t:1:aron F. (;lilfill
~'.n "-"1f'
hke Dr.1rs (rir to hell bq;;i~
(XL IS, 1979.
111111 hb !~lll bilUI<)ay and I
Iril'lIdlaYthimr!)CktoC"lineUI
,ift Thtmomf'nlht look lhallirsl
Slllob,Bel1kll'''hellUh>)Oktd.
Tilt slur! Just made him leellllO
,....
from Ihrn Oil, 3dl U~('d (0 let
~ICh. u.rntUmu Imo.1nl ItO~
...,lholtudlnadl,
llt\ril'dlnquil,enrollinllnlullf
dillNtnt drulPel'lbililallon rf~
"ami. Dill nont ..-orktd. Thl"ll ht
Irll'd VlctolY Outr~lch
Victory Oullclch II a tou~h.1I().
n"nUn~(', lo....blldJtl, 11l.~olun.
terr ,nlnhlry thl 'pull" I
{hUTrh and hvt' lrte dru~. and II
(<lhol,tlubjJillli(llll"tnltr~ in ~I\'
lJitlll Counly. And, II Bell ."d
ol.hcrJ put ll, Vldol' Oulruch
"ain"t lI~tnoolherprolum.~
NurlyallollhtcoW'lulor.'ur
VietolY Outrufh are former dru,
.ddieU, lan, members, tOIl~ic~,
Jlfo~litulc, a~d, lenerally 'I"'~""
Inl. lhe oolcas15 01 Jt)tiety. Thy
...no"'andull.,kr'land....lltlttht
Jakl:S 01 I~t 1I"Nld a.re cominl
ffOlnbetaulcllle}"ubeen:Mre
Even rulllr Ton~ CUlm.n. "'ho
dirr.:1.1 IhfChrisll~nmlnlllry wilh
hi, wife. Nellie. Is anu.llopc all.
dlcl.l.nlmcm"crandcQn.kL
SaId CU1man: "My job II to ILl'
~Uf and brlnl In, one ....ay or III
I'~~r, till- .oul pwr1t IlIlhl, cily
<lmychulth.I"ucalkdloreach
tlll'd"rer:'-'<1d,nar'nly,oal.nd
1'1I)"l'r: 'Lord, kN'f'> me ...ilh lho
dnpe Iiend: ~
Jlke Dell, no.. tI and drUl 1rN',
ul~ Vlct(iry ()uln~rb workt'd '...r
hlrn ..hen Ilth.-r ~olum' I.il~
t>crau~"!.Orr.eonc WU \IIilUnllQ
l.al"'l<lrnt!or'I mylcvel,~
rhlS, Dell hn luded In druc~
{or Good IndtheGo~rel,JomU("hlo
thai his entire con,'uullon Is
f'eNH!red wUh'TralstCod.CodlJ
,ood."
'Tll toe bone3I,~ Wild Bell, I Los
""
....
\a~,/
f~:~~,
\ . . - ,', l
_1.11',..:.,.
~., 1
.': .,:t'
,'. "v.
. ":'f
.;.,..*
r'~ ,:; ('
::':1' .
\['It
':}t.:~/(
.') ~',~d"'l"
,.-t"'lj;
,.,~
,.... ~;i!(1
',.'. ..
,'-ll:\',."
." :,,~'l'fv
i?rt ;'~"/.;.i
..;." .t"..(1'~~
/. .~~.;,,,Ii
t:t>~~').'
'; :;~:,
f,:
Jose DeLeon, like manyoJ the volunltler counselors at
VIctory Oulr'Hlch, used to be Involved wlth drugs.
,f,nlCIcs nallvt whose fOllr brllU,.
cn died 1i0<l1 or v~rt killed bf:.
cause of in~olvemrl'lt with drup,
"f ha't Iran
''I'm cellini lip III age and I
don't wanllo .~lip bae.... I belint
lhat If I krcppuyi",loG!)(j, I'll
mJoe II. I lell\ilhoHpuyer.-
Vlrl(iry Outreach claims a 4~
PCI<"<,,,t ~u<<'('ss r~le In CQnvc.llnl
a,kJiclSl<ladrlll.lreelHtlIlyll',and
[leU, lllelormrro_nerol anC'<t~l>-
lithc" StlllthCcotral Los ,f,ltccln
T'flnl III..", Is nne ollu JUCrr.~l"~.
"I had Ilvcn up on lilt: Jaid
Dell, .,ho viii soon cuduate Iro:ltll
tile Vlelory ChrlreHh mcn',home
In }o;nc~nto. "I t1u,lU11I1 about lIiil.
lnl rupdr but t Illurcd I W':U II.
IC~"y dnd. noek coulne, Irl
Sat"n. Slrallhl "1'./10 C'''a~cr.M
VlcloryOutrcachMlnlJtdt~ IJ I
_urld,,;de ilfICullon, lounlk:d 21
rau al:O by Sonny ArClllntonl,1
'\l'mer beroin addict frolll Nc\ll'
YOI~ City. Mlulnzonl belJll lall.
hrlmrnlnlohishonleandhtlplnl
lhcmlicIILhelr6rul~!.llS.
Once thc men "ere 011 drillS,
tI.cyverc.tnlbKktothedruc.
lnlcslcd a~ cr,me.ridden oelC".
burh'lQ<h I/om wbleh lhey came
'fhelr mission lI'U t., brllll In oth.
ers hn rehaloilitllUoll,
That'i hG\It 1l aU sl.arltd ud
lh"r,ho", the mJnl~try ~ntf:ll
loo;y, "h~r~ ale 100 ViClory 0111.
rnc" sitc! .crol.' lh~ coontry, IS
...-rll I.t In Mcllco, Drll~ln, Spain
an,J lI"llan,,] and In Afrlca.
Tuny and Ncllle CUllllan loand
C<I lI,e S,ln Dit'J,o minbtry rive
yea" ~I:t) ~~d.lu,lllkt ,f,rClIlntnnl.
lhey lK-lan hy .aiUnc Sa.. Oie,o
s\rerl~. IISUnl: addicu to lin lIr
drolts an,,] jll.~te~6 10 try God.
Tire San Olelo opcr.llon Is
!.a~c,l In lA'~a.n 1I1'1lhLJ, IU 1(lO..
mcr,,1>':-rehurcllandccnlraloHke
a.relocatedinallold,CQllVe'tf'd
nit in!: faclory on Nallon.ll ,f,we-
nueltislllarOll,ll,predomlnanlly
{.,tinu ncil~borhood, IUUt)lIndtd
b.l'furrtlG....n.CuHill-covtrdhOll5.
Se-e\(ic:loryonPllgeB.IO
Victory: It shows the way out of hen
Continued from S.)
es and buildinl', CourlSelors 600't
bn In walk lilT lnliod lilt pt'n,1lt
Ihcy"ttlruchinclor
He rn,nj~lry Is an ~ll,volur,tcer
np<';~lton - no coull.teior Is r~id
Thr (/ultcHh IIIjni~lr~ and iLs Illulh.
pIc opl'r allolU .Ie lUrpnrtcrl Ijnlo~l
rnllrrly Il(lm c1lurcll tilllc3. "0'11'
tlGn~ an,J flln6raL<rrs
Viclory Outruch ha been rccol'
ni'rd for lu _OI"k by M~YGr Ma'''....''
OTnnrM\r, Ilrp. Jim Oalp,s, San Dif'IO
CUy COllndlmall WCll'rall. Natioul
City M.yOl" Cr<<le 11 Watera irlrl
Chub VlsIIIM,)'or(;rcgotyCol.Na.
Ilonlll,. lorrner First Lad, Nancy
llul~~ h)~ commen'!l'd the worl6.
wid!' nrl",,,,'" I" iU eHoru with
drlllad~,cLs.nd lllnl: "","ben
^d"irLt pa1 nGthin~ 10 slay nlr'loC IG
12 r"onthsIn thrmiui,'lry'ldrlll-re.
hibililalironllorn!:l,blllsta)'lnctbCle
h~esdi$Cipilne
Thrse ..~ nor n.cdy <kcGrlt.d
hn,,,,,, wh.re lull-(o,,JIu muls In
scuCII thrf"t IIm'"5 I 6~y, Dr.aUall
n1a~ c~nsill 01 collt'i' Ind ,lce, dlo.
ner may lie bUl\Sa..d baad. Nfl! e~.
e'yone hll I bed Thllly me~ ,hare
onr dlflll"er, The rby brill,. at ~:lO
a.m,...-ilk6nGlionand1libleiludy
AIlf! breaklas!. rcsldrnb _01"'-
SGmr lfl to ,"orll lor ooLJldrC0l'l1ra.
niM. ~Il.~., Inay iiml"ly ''151'1 C'II in
lilt lI('i~~horhllOd 10 rillt mOlll'1 l~
ra~ rcnlll /h~ ilnnll'
(:Ulnlan uid tM aim 01 :i1c mi~;~.
In' I' n~l r... I...". . ,......."'r.l.r..
:.^
101' tile rc.llilrnl.! nalhcr Ills 10 in.
Iro.-!u(c IhemloGo<I,disdpll",and
bard,hoi'I-CJI..or....It'sflotusy,Guz.
mlns.,i~. It's IruSltltinc
..We're,."'~Gllhecrallt'.St~olllt
in I~ "nrJ~, l!reI3Qrnrtimu." IIr
"'d, "We s!,<luid all he commiltrd
vitn slrailJH~rLJ becau~e ..e ecl'
sGmeullhcf\lostllnJiscipl,nedpco.
ll:r11youlur>klnlhcdictiollllylol
thc ..nrd 'Iln"i~cipllnrd: 10u'6 srr
lne II~r of I clop. Iit'ncl Thry hie
aUlh"'iI1,"
Alm"~1 d.,il)', "ktolY Outrral'h
Nlunldo1l and clienLllan out InlG
dey ~lr...Ls. lnlnelor In" plr~lh.
Inlllntlrueatl6iru.,,f,crollp(ound
IknnisPif',no<<minCtlo"nlnIUey
10 l.os "'n~rlf'S
"icrc,'.J3,wnstrunIQut on rock
l'Onl"l'. Hil abu~e "loblen>1 h,1
k,,,n with alcohol. lie ..nt Ilum
bw.e tG Jm,,~lrll nllr Ij"a..a., Irom
m~,ij,'''na 10 htrolnand [rom Ileruin
tocrldo
IIN(llnl"daHlhttolMr6tuISIJe
.."e"t~ally klrked. CI1<..... hG.e~er,
"'!ckl'>l ~'m
IIC')\ Jobld \~l riCll:ebrlan
hav\"IlI'('lkslllhurta.lbckslro,n
hh u.teollO(k cocajrol' - hr worea
"ac..m~krr
[)odoIJwltnedlhatlie_nklllill(
!lims"lI lie lell a. M,.pltal at f}l>Ofl
onc s"lurllJY,lIl1ly 10 ttturn I.."
hOJtS j,ller ~(lpt'd up l)II~t 11;ln 00
frIC.... "You'rrcra1y,"tbedocI0f
......" ~ld rcleaSl'd h;~t ,,~I~ ""~fJ be.
" "V~.
I
>-/ /(
-'--.'
It~'L.
Too.)' l'ierceuj'J,C'<lnli"rntly:"I'
hH'r 110 "c-'irr ltoput Lhllplp<:'upto
my lace. I t1lOu(hl nQlblnlcould ever
.r.elp n~ ~lor Irn<llo.lng 1M pIp<:', Celd'
i~ loodl ~no'/l' bcYWld lhe sllado_ 01'
adu'lbl,l'mcolnIIGniilktil:'
EvcrYllrlln,"GmlnlndYGulh.bo
uYI/heyhavtl.lrkfcl6rucaddictlGn
Ihroucll Victory Qut/cadl SJlCIU oil
drep and a.hldinc I,Uh In Go6, To
JOInt, lhe}' msy ~m Ilmost lan.n.
cll,cull,like,
n~l.lortlll'm,llwolkJ
"I"mstrwIllOIlLI'nlboo"'tdOfllu_'
In~ thc pu..er 01 God ,"ort: pro-'
ebir", J~e OeLcon.lhe Victory 01,11.
rl'acllmcn'lhGmro;iiret:lorwhoonu
K/Vt'611meinledrra.lprb<lnfofll't.
liro/l:UlIahlwllbt..opollnd,olb,.
IQ;nalllw:ai'portinF'rf'SI>lI
"I kllQW U's thr !..<Ild 1I00klncln
my lile," lI~dlru llople Jaime. ..ho
wuscslrunl out or; cclld ibeet"'.
lidertd btcumln, I prOlititl1r tOiUP.
rmthtrh3bil
NGw.Jallnr u. dry..llff. eounnb
oI11tr wORlcnlndilloollinclOl'..ud
t..lkrlble relumlnc her Iwoc-kil.
drrntullcrUle,.lthouChtlvould
ne,rr be IGrmil a.lill," ille uYI.
GU'.nll~ rnvlslOIll more rrohaloill.
hUOI,ho,"nlormrnandwo-menin
~n DiC'G Cou.:y, 111<I._ lh~ min.
Istry piana 1<1 buy. 'leant KOO.aoo
dlllrch n('u B;rllooa f'lr~.
"(;w('anchau,ead"pefic"","
CUlman uid, '1"0 my 'urprl~t, Go.!'
IO'l'dmf'aot!chan,edmeJ\r.dllrcl
thc b','~Jt ~r"'" j. ;f I .-I;"n'I.lo tell
-- ~~_._. --.
" }~~_.:~/e
June 2, 1992
Subject:
Councilman Jerry Rindone
. (c.-
John Goss, City Manager ~,rf~
Robert A. Leiter, Director of Planning ;tilt
Responses to Questions Regarding Item No. 15 of Council Agenda for June 2,
1992
To:
Via:
From:
.I..
Why did the RCC not reschedule a special meeting prior to June 22 to consider this
item? Would this not have been appropriate?
A: The RCC was and is unable to obtain a quorum due to one vacancy and several
members being on vacation. Even the regular meeting of June 8, 1992 had to be
canceled for this reason. The RCC did, however, meet on May 18, 1992 to
discuss this case but was unable to make a recommendation because of the four
members present, one had a conflict of interest. This left only three eligible
members, but because of a lack of a quorum they were not able to vote. The
RCC was aware at that time that the item would be going to Council on June 2nd
and stated that any RCC member wishing to speak to the proposal before council
would need to do so as an individual rather than representing the RCC.
Sections 2.32.050.B and 2.32.050.C of the Municipal Code state:
"B. The Commission, its chairperson or designated member may review all
environmental documents to assure adequate commission review, analysis
and comment.
C. In conjunction with input on environmental documents, the commission
may make recommendations regarding the environmental impact, energy
or resource conservation or impact on historic resources of the project to
the appropriate decision-making authority."
Since making a recommendation is not mandatory (use of the word "may"), staff
interpreted this to mean that the item could go forward to Council without a
recommendation from the RCC.
lZ;-~/ /.2
Councilman Jerry Rindone
-2-
June 2, 1992
2. According to the report, on Page 15-3, "This proposal would centralize Victory
Outreach's services for San Diego County in the South Bay." How many clients would
directly be served from Chula Vista?
A: During the public hearing before the Planning Commission, the applicants
clarified that there are actually two Victory Outreach churches in San Diego
County, the one on Fir Street in San Diego and one in Escondido.
The San Diego church provides services to the area approximately south of
Clairemont and east to El Cajon. The Escondido church provides services to
North County cities. Each church's program provides the same services, has the
same goals and policies and answers to the same parent organization.
There are approximately 80 total residents in Victory Outreach facilities in the
southern part of the county, both men and women. Of these, about 15 are from
Chula Vista with just over half being men.
3. Residents are not permitted to have vehicles on site or to wander on the grounds or from
the grounds without authorization. How is this guaranteed and/or how is this actually
monitored?
A: Victory Outreach does not allow residents to have their own vehicles at the
facility. This is strictly enforced.
The counsellors supervise the residents at all times during the day, even on field
trips out of Chula Vista. The residents are never left alone, according to Victory
Outreach personnel. During the evening, five staff are present who remain awake
throughout the night. One of their duties is to ensure that the residents do not
attempt to leave the facility.
4. How many staff members are present during the day and during the evening who are llQ1
former residents of "Victory Outreach"? (NOTE: Do not include the six administrative
staff on duty during business hours.)
A:
Eight ~ unse f are NOT former residents of Victory Outreach, and
of these <<!ght. two~~_on~. in the evening and six during the day. This figure
does not ffiMu Istrative staff.
~
/r;--//3
Councilman Jerry Rindone
-3-
June 2, 1992
5. The report indicated approximately 200 letters of support were received. Were these
letters of support quite similar or were they a form letter? Please provide samples.
A: At last count, there were 26lletters of support and 66 pages of petitions with 484
signatures for a total of 745 signatures. Of the letters, approximately 80 are form
letters with the remainder being hand written or typed. Letters in both English
and Spanish were received, and a number of businesses wrote in support.
Samples of these letters and petitions are provided.
6. Please list all agencies and/or programs operating near (within 1/2 to 3/4 mile radius) the
proposed site which bring into this neighborhood special social services. Include the
number of persons housed and counted as adult welfare recipients of services by these
agencies and/or programs.
A: Besides the Nosotros program: mentioned in the report to Council, the only
agency operating within 3/4 mile of the project site is South Bay Pioneers,
another alcohol recovery program with 18 residential units housing 24 male
residents.
At the time of the writing of this response, Staff was not able to make. contact
with South Bay Pioneers to ascertain the number of "persons housed and counted
as adult welfare recipients of services by these agencies and/or programs. "
7. What CEQA protections are there if the Council determines that there may be "serious
public controversy" over the environmental effects? Is there case law in this area?
Please explain.
A: The CEQA Guidelines, which are issued by the state and govern local
implementation of CEQA, provide the following direction on the issue of "serious
public controversy." In Section 15064 (h), the Guidelines state:
"In marginal cases where it is not clear whether there is substantial evidence that
a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the Lead Agency shall
be guided by the following factors:
(1) "If there is serious public controversy over the environmental effects of
a project, the Lead Agency shall consider the effect or effects subject to
the controversy to be significant and shall prepare an EIR. Controversy
unrelated to an environmental issue does not require preparation of an
EIR."
/~, 1/7'
Councilman Jerry Rindone
-4-
June 2, 1992
(2) "If there is disagreement between experts over the significance of an effect
on the environment, the Lead Agency shall treat the effect as significant
and shall prepare an EIR. "
Numerous legal challenges have occurred on this issue which have provided clarification
on how the courts interpret this section of the Guidelines. The following cases, as
summarized from Guide to the California Environmental Ouality Act (Remy, Thomas &
Moose, 1992), provide an example of the trend the courts have taken. The main trend
is that public controversy, alone, does not constitute a significant environmental effect.
There must be substantial evidence in the record that an environmental effect will occur.
1. Perley v. County of Calaveras (3rd Dist. 1982) 137 Cal. App. 3d 424, 436 [187
Cal. Rptr. 53, 60-61], the Court held that "the opposition of a few neighbors" did
not rise to the level of a "serious public controversy" because the neighbors had
merely expressed "their fears and desires" without any "objective basis for
challenge". This decision thus implies that "seriousness" must have a substantial
evidentiary basis.
2. Board of Suoervisors of Sacramento County v. Sacramento Local Al1:ency
Formation Commission (3d Dist. 1991) 234 Cal. App. 3d 1231, 1254 "mere
concern and subjective speculation having no objective basis is not "evidence; "an
agency's conclusions are not evidence."
3. Leonoff v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors (6th Dist. 1990) 222 Cal.
App. 3d 1337 [272 Cal. Rptr. 372]. The Court of Appeal upheld a negative
declaration against an attack mounted by citizens demanding an E.I.R. The
project in question was a permit authorizing construction of a "contractor's
service center" on 1.74 acres of vacant property already zoned for commercial
uses. In upholding the agency's decision, the Court exhaustively analyzed the
quality of "evidence" relied on by petitioners. The Court concluded that
"unsubstantiated opinions, concerns and suspicions about a project, though sincere
and deeply felt, do not rise to the level of substantial evidence supporting a fair
argument of significant environmental effect". The Court emphasized that
environmental decisions should be based on facts, not feelings.
4. In Lucas Valley Homeowners Association v. County of Marin (1st Dist. 1991)
233 Cal. App. 3d. 130 [284 Cal. Rptr. 427], the Court of Appeal upheld a
negative declaration for a conditional use permit allowing a small Orthodox
Jewish congregation to convert for use as a synagogue a 4,800 sq. ft. two-story
single-family residence on a 13,500 sq. ft. lot.
/"~- / l~
Councilman Jerry Rindone
-5-
June 2, 1992
As [mally approved, the project included a great many conditions limiting the size
and number of various events and preventing further expansion to accommodate
additional members absent permit modifications.
Regarding the severity of impacts of the project as approved, the Court could find
no substantial evidence in the record supporting a fair argument that the project
might cause significant environmental effects.
In conclusion, unless there is evidence presented in the record that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment, public controversy, alone, is not enough to require an EIR.
Staff has evaluated this particular project, and has concluded that there are no potentially
significant environmental effects. If Council disagrees with this conclusion, and concludes that
there may be significant environmental effects from this project, then Council should identify
those impacts which they feel may be significant, and the basis for those conclusions. Staff
would then return to Council with a draft resolution articulating these findings.
The City Attorney would also like to point out that in order to approve the requested Conditional
Use Permit, the Council would need to make the findings required in Section 19.14.080 of the
Municipal Code as referred to on pp. 15-33 and 15-34. While staff has recommended that these
findings be made for the reasons cited in the staff report, the Council may wish to reevaluate
these recommendations if public testimony suggests that different conclusions are warranted.
cc: Mayor and City Council
City Attorney
(lUndooe)
;Z;. J /b
~~
(Iidol'ff {)atl"taci
CHURCH
590 Fir 51reel
San Diego, (A.
91101
,"
. t ~
~
1\'
'E:Cr::-'1
...... "re-
',!)
--
, .
~~ . . a
&::1i' ,_~.__:_..r-.,,;,--'
'-,.",- -, ~-
, ", f'~^,. ~_, "r .' .
.,:. ..~,~.~ "';"~~'",' .,-.~:*-1r;..
.. ,':I '-'\I!t.~ft.,....\.....""..r.- ~,,"ft
.r" ". ~."..~~..{..~..g~~ ',' .
City Council 00 Chula Vista:
Chu1a Vista, California 91910
HONORABLE COUNCIL MEMBERS:
This petition is from the Lasidential and business community surrounding 3 North
Second Street. formally the old Southwood Hospital in Chula Vista.
We the undersigned are in support of VICTORY OUTREACH obtaining the conditional
use permit for a rehabilitation facility at this site.
Res;:>ectfully.
~:ame (Print)
];J<- ~~
{)
",,",,-t 1".""1 1,l't,l
r
JU ' .L~" , ~ . ( )-'
'Ny"''', (.{, ~.:
c.'). \~.i;- hri.,~
n0 AI?-!() CeuL
.~ /1 t/J etd
(:~~:~;=~Jf1\~
12 01-1 n f\r
Address
Sianature
'J7 .
-'1-!J~ t A_(,.....v.\.....:....u~
v
v,\ r> &\r , +-C,. \ l,-
C. '., LA .".~... l._J
,
~
~
.
~~/
~/~~
~~~(v)r--
~.. J!(}~"&f"fI,t[)
. a a ()
Tony and Nellie
Guzman /~ ~ / / 7
~ 1:.,.,':''-''---
':'-::,
.~' ~-'-7-
'-
--..------
...,,,........- ~~1.
----..,"'I';;&:-.._-~...-.. -_..~
RECEIVED
April 28, 1992
CITY OF CHOLA VISTA
PLANIIJIfVG
Dear Sirs/Madams:
We are residents of Chula vista living at 189 Guava Ave., Chula
Vista, California.. We are both originally from Orange County but have
made San Diego County, and in particular Chula Vista, our home with our
two daughters ages 1 month and 10 yrs.
We are writing this letter to express our concern and thoughts on
the opening of a rehabilitation center on 3 North Second Street, Chula
vista by Victory Outreach of San Diego.
Both myself and my wife are very well informed on the
rehabilitation program offered by Victory Outreach and the church
itself, including its many services offered to the community. I am the
son of a Free Methodist pastor who is presently pastoring a church in
placentia, California. My wife has been working as a legal secretary
for over 15 years and was last employed at the law firm of Gray, Cary,
Ames & Frye. She is now at home looking after our newborn child. Our
ten (10) year old daughter is presently attending Feaster Elementary
School in Chula vista.
Our concern is that this City close the doors to the possibility of
an excellent program which offers hope and assistance to those who
desire it. We strongly believe that the crime and violence which can
be prevented by the program offered at Victory Outreach far surpasses
the threat of the possibility of any harm and danger to our
neighborhoods, city and in particular our children.
We believe that PREVENTION is a key word here. Many a crime and
accidents can and are being prevented daily by the well-staffed and
careful guidance offered in the program. We as parents are
particularly concerned about the crimes of drug and violence which can
infiltrate our neighborhood and the schools to which our children
attend. For this reason we strongly urge the City of Chula vista to
consider the opening of this rehabilitation program to offer the help
to those who need it and to get them off our streets and into a well-
structured, well staffed (24 hour) and well-equipped program which has
proven itself over the years to be a success.
We intend to continue living here in Chula vista. We are very
pleased with the peaceful neighborhood, the friendly and concerned
neighbors and the school to which are daughter attends. We hope that
Chula vista will not join the ranks of those cities which over the
years have deteriorated beyond hope. For this we ask you to carefully
consider the opening of this program and enjoy its many benefits over
the years to come.
"2/4./pC /> (l
Daniel Esqu.i:il~l .~ L ~
Laurie Esquivel
Concerned citizens
DE:LAE
/cJ-jI5
MONTELON~J CONSTRUCT.~G~~PANV
211 Church Avenue
Suite B : ~:.
Chula Vista, CA 92010 P
('.",427-1777 LANNING
Lie. #372585
IJ-?ZI'- Z.b; /'192-
7Z E : V1571f- Ii '- L-
hel L-I 7)/
3 ,J~. 2 ttY Sr,
ew tr4 V,? TiI, Gt'1 .
7lJ tU Ho t.1 I T A1ry Leu; G.~
JJ EfT12 :5; Z2- s :
:r /1711 jU J2.1 77 IJ q 7ZJ yo J OU B G'fI;tf"L-r L1 F ph;
Il "
\!icrirr--/ (Jt.I~fI PJU)6jU1V/.
5' ;It1t'G -Svf'11oI~':--lc:U /7fi;i. eFFOJZrS. of 77f-15 7i27J1CJJ]?OUS
tiA nJ J S Tbt e: s.f' &' G, IYL L- Y 7J'1v -s e D ~ Zt=-V, TO JJ 'I 61./ i:/v11rlJ.
.:I /'EEqQJJlrL--L-y fhwE: 8Ec:tI, ;J~I otl'-Y 11 -s{/f>fJt:}~Z
OF -nJ-t; jJ7ZV61 effn1, :0 vi #L-60 /f ?tHJD 4J j2I) / Jf
Vfr7Zl0J<S LoCA4770t<!S, (fty ;JE{9(1130Z~ 0ZJ:S /Y}frl-e:
!YJc-tE NO/o;E Tf/1HJ 77h:=--Y :IJo /}#.1J vJc1lle -;lrtp t)vtE.. -30
/V1 IEN frI 01-1 e TJ /VI E J
5' iJoUt--j) r;:f\!cOuElfGrE -rd-h= pLA-rJ~({.Jr:, ~,(A/S5IDN
TO ;J::, 5 I 5 T 77fE:s E 0 l/ 7?-efiCJI I'" TJI-e: I J!. e:= FRJ 12-15
TO Ot3ntIP 77TE12- C. u, 'P,
-r:;HnJ0 f=i?7Z- ,/oJF- 5ur:'?o~T.
Development-Com . / --)/ ~
merclal-Residential-Room Additions-':J ~ 1
l'
'4
J-
IY~C~/V~D
WL""VIVI
IvG
Mr. Martin Miller
Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, Ca. 91910
Dear ~~. Miller,
This is to advise the City Planning Department that I am in favor of
Victory Outreach Church opening a rehabilitation facility at 3 North
Second Street, Chula Vista.
I recommend a "yes" vote to Victory Outreach's conditional use application.
Yours Truly, /
>,~ ,r/~/<,-
s~,.,L +
~.""~
!JWu ~~I t-?~
91'7/ /
)~);)(}
_=~-_- _~- . t ~_a1Yl--UJd/~!I~ __!:J__~!'!IVJ!vG~'" ~m_ =.-
.. ~ 1t~::~~ctb.~ !fIt- .~U~ _
II, 7i1 _{)tl~ ~.. ~,':1 ~ ~;I--- -
/r.; Jf} .At. . n<.z:w.t+, . ..... .... . . -..
m~.1:~tJu{.ifr,~ ~1~nn - ....~~.
0/~ p~r;u-::r., 'dlQ _ C/.J tx- ~It~ ..-
. -rrc --.- -- .
--~.._-------/ -tClrll - '-
c.lw,.lo.__u~
. . -- ." __.~--=-~-_==-~-~__--~!~t ~):2 /
JliAt 16
(iiCe ~6U~L(i
&-;<-'/,2,
----:-11
-- Jl.
OrAi"~'1
WE THE UNDERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY HOlfB FOR TH1l DRUG /WI) ALCOHOL
DEPEND&NTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE A ~ING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
.s/riI/ f;Y
/
1<1
,
rrtJ
:
)
_&~~
~
f
!,
llnj ~.?-
"I
5 /:2) / 1/
C~'n) v-~d~
;;JJI/'7
U 6. g~_____
L~ -;,
, ) --.. \. /-
~
2:= ~7~~
~ ~L-~
6 :J /- ('J-
"
//.'
1
'"..~
~L) '-~JU)
.-
C'.J {-1;)' -
~ 1~~ p-'
_ '=~~'7l f/ 6~t~-a:..-.
"
0'
r /~.,
,c'; 2:y",~
.7;2/ /
6/~1 /
>
Ij
I
7J!. (
\
Y~-i7::u~/f6~*z
/-'
AI<,
[~....t::-<::~".('_-e;"_7-;"<~_~
~./.., I - li~n", d"
, (71 - <.II.// C1Lu.-c/
I ./
, ( t;).;)-
.
i /i
,",'(fl/l"
~::T7
/5 /) J. J..
\
-------- '1
I
WE THE UNDERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY HOllE FOR THE DRUG AND IlLCOHOL
DEPENDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND'AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE A Du.KPING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
, ^
/\ 0 ..
~
:\~
'OJ
... 3/)2
.
!
..Ii / (.
,""Crt :, ." 0
, x); ( '>!/' i, <. -t/:!
rl;,,J LI /\;1')
51'~.! 'I :).
iyi,.",,'
1\.A../"L/'" "
:I '
.__lL\.-L:Z /1 L'?i''J-
"
';I:st,Jh--.
I
, .7'(- if(
I
'1::x-e"" t. () , /}A
,~"
tj I
'oJ Jc, '1.1
I
!U'l
(:~tu!i xi/J"Ltlt
~
i
~11rJ/fl
5/3c( q"i-
/ i(~ J4((/
'/~ u I~(V
'i~. It it k~f--
--- . "0 12--
~7 .>
1-kcrz ~.z ( . k? ~ <-_1 '~7
1
/drl
r _ 2. )."!-')
') .Jl ,;c-
, {~
/;/i/9,L
OL~
, .
~/ V 'il /'
o Uf. L ( l G____
) --- )",--,
S / ,J..)
I
I
WE THE UNOERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
RliHItBILITATION AND RECOVlJRY HOJtB FOR THE DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DBP&NV&NTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE A DUKPING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
NAME. ADDRESS. PHONE
SIGNATURE
.1
'0
~
;%'7
/
, (/ ",,'?<{
.:5-~Cl
(
~~--v;/ib<
.-? ;7 -, /' - ,
/~~d~~?:
(), g- 'H.-c1.:t- L-l-C~
'crt
5/30
~" ~ ~l-(:y/
"5/30
~,
< _\\
~
513t\
/1D1l QuvJF
sjsD
..w....
'r
/~', (') "
<' ), { k .
,~c"..>", '/1' /u...
,. .I\.{t_~lLf~J
, ,
/r;--- /;2 Lj
JI
"
I
I
WE THE UNDERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY HOJOl FOR THB DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DEPENDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE A DUltPING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
)'\
11':1-,
,
1~J
l~:,l!cff
{Il
L'~~y
'lz...
l':Il/
;,/~l/ 1)11/1'/ ,};fd;
/l..,..../I,....-(.I...-~"" L .., .....1
\ I
/ C1 'L,
/
:'~/
L/ 't.;
:j1/ctJ- < q'~1
? Vi' ~
12 1-,,>
{;/; Ii l ?
C/lhz /1.., A n (/
/ <:. f1i;~i 9 /~r<? ~~
q J c; 1 [J
lv(, ~ . )"uoC\ K~o~
q} "
0'\ \.Oi VJ.,Li( ~ 11'1 I Or I 0
00'
...--- ~/
I '_'-c ~/ 2c_~;
I
I
WE THE UNDERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
RliHItBILITIITION IIND RECOVBRY HOIIB FOR THB DRUG IIND ALCOHOL
DEPEND&NT.S AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE II DUJtPING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
~/W/f{
.6 f- o/l?-
/0-',""'-
)
C}'11 j? ) ;)
/11~}Df-p-,-u/':,
2m f2L
15
5/l-1/,12/
'l/^
, -
/f\.a 'j" ,)7 ~.., \,~tJiL
~7 /::. j ,:.(~,;- . "'''',--'<0,
f-
q2~/I2-
x:' /i(!.., '.,.;1 ~ '-- / Ii .
, . . . /r \. . P . ,'" U....f- 7-r-
,,_ /,' t-l_'-_ -. j.-' _..>
/'1 " .'
:5)x;) c; J
(}J.:';-')>)/2
c
----------
..Y / ; / ~-:/--~~
,
. )h..c~"~/ol' LA ,-C~'l.t).,
~/
/ ,~., ~-
S ./ (/1/7 C
1:, ,/)j '/!
~ /', <'-f c-- "
'-f/;</j~,11 i: .;. :~_~
/ (t, _. '-./. ,.__
-]..,,- -II
J:~I ;!~~/<I
II .
1,/
/' ./
) /---'" 'j).-
;j )\...r;i-r'
I
'-<""l/~'\-'<~-&'
'j' .
-' '.'\ /1' Ii
,1 ."
> (: (C/~, .,.'
l' ~ '"
;'4,- .
_ ."V 1<.
L<)' 1,,; i ,1;/ './
[I" ,F ,r--
..--1 y ,.' r. ...
le,j,I,
/_/ j-Lf//
I
I
W& TH& UND&RSIGN& OPPOSE TH& LOCATION OF TH&
REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY HOJI/l FOR TH/l DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DEPENDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENU& FOR REASONS OF SAF&TY,
W&LFARE, W&LL-B&ING, SECURITY, P&AC& AND ENJOYM&NT,
ESTHETICS, AND TH& ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALU& OF
HOM&S IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
B& A ~ING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL US& PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
cJ)-2-Z- elL
.;-,
v_.21.._
~~.;{-,9.:Z
c
J::
~
5 .J) 1}
L_
/
n
10
1
illt.0
./"
::;-j)- 1'1
/:;"- ~
~L./
-',
, -~~-y;z
';
-~ZZ:1-.' ".
~r"~
~
~
,t-7'._ /il
..., - r~2
.4 -;1.2
t:.J
t:. fflv
. ~l i~(T
.-;.....- '') '- ?/
,- v
1
s-)g' -17'
cP-}J'-9v i
5::)8" 9:L
I ..Q
/ J {;:tr'diL}J 14-.,
I cJ R
. n I..-(:nc
j
'c t,)t.b-&If1..d'l71.../
/;;, -<.LP ( /J
) v-- f
1"/
'~~
~--,._--.,-_._--
jC;"/J7
I
I
WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY HOME FOR DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DEPENDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT, AND THE
ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF HOMES IN THE
NEIGHBORHOODS. AS APPOINTED RRPRR~RNrATrVR~ OF OUR
COMMUNITY, THE CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMJlfISSION SHOULD
RECOMME~ THE DENIAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT. (PCC-92-42I,
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
II ..-1._
~
-.0
c.;/").-6 2
tV
~~
~
\
c::;: '--
I
I
WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY HOftIE FOR DRut: AND ALCOHOL
DEPENDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY.
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT, AND THE
ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF HOMES IN THE
NEIGHBORHOODS. AS APPOINTED RRPRE~ENTATrVES OF OUR
COMMUNITY, THE CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION SHOULD
RECOMMEND THE DENIAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT, (PCC-92-42l,
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS. PHONE
SIGNATURE
.....
/),r-//- 9.:?
;O~~ 0<_ 4
$-/0.12
d~JM.
5 -\~ ."12- rL...v.~~
5)0(11- ~
~ - / /- 'I c) (It! .~
,
,() '.
5-//-9) CY\ ~VT€.W)
.~
~"
,~b~
6-IIJ(J.-
~-l\-T;}
~;{IrF~
5-11- 12
"
<-
~
S:f(.9c7
Sjlt/rJ-
1;V
.c-JI
l_S- - /;2. ,~
I
I
WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY HOfrIE FOR DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DEPENDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETV,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOVMENT, AND THE
ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF HOMES IN THE
NEIGHBORHOODS. AS APPOINTED RgPRg~ENTATIVES OF OUR
COMMUNITY, THE CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMJl1lISSION SHOULD
RECaMHEND THE DENIAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT. (PCC-92-42l,
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
l/j30) 9~
A-
1srJ
,
~
,
~o
\.
I
I
WE THE UNDERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHllBILITATION AND RECOVERY HONE FOR THE DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DEPENDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE A DVWPING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE SIGNATURi
';/.'1.1./ t( L I 'reE cfMtd 0<d;
(- !;'"gS- fio9iJ
. .
. .
.
.
~
/-:;-: / ~ '7
I
I
WE THE UNDERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHlUJILITATION AND RECOVERY HOJIB FOR THB DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DBP&ND&NTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE A DUlIPING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
_NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
vJn
SIGNATURE
5/31/ ell
~
/pI
_~~ ;/'1,2
~c---'u~<
s;-ft-~{j
~) I' /. ~. , '''', , ,~
...'"
, .'
~
"
;;d: >fi, yi (.---{
,
~
57]/ /7 L,
-Z-/../ .-<',4" ,/
. /7C-"-'~,,-__//,:::?:_ --,,;t{.
6/J/r{J
/lI( /)' k; " '
/ll{d-"C(j::: ,.vttt.~,
J s- /3 G)
I
I
WE THE UNDERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHABILITIITION IIND R/JCOVERY HOIllJ FOR THE DRUG IIND IILCOHOL
DEPENDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE II DUlIPING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
,. ( ,1.1/ t(2-
~4c1t ~(4
il
6/0//92-
0/ Jj9~ <
(
Cr j- q d ,
c
6 ;-9!!--
c)
~{
-1!7~
~-I-r/ j
....~
c~. ~n;;ltvc~
1/1 ~
~~he/l?q~
l
& -1-72
h~/-9;J-
{;u1YLU)C;Jv ,'J:; fcV2~-,
,I
.'
"'il !,
"f '.
.:' ~.
(
/--T
/
. .J
(:
~ ). '1
OP - \:> Y\A.'~S~
/'~/'~I
'-> - \
.~
e((~ coumILti'PVh.1LUsd~ q{U\e~ 2--1
VJtj{~~:t:1RQGN~ OPPO~HE (g~~~/ ~E C hO Yl. he~
~/&
qrAvOA){/
REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY H01fli FOR THE DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DEPENDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE A D~ING GROUN.D. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
-) ( ,'1.2/ if 2..
- ".' ,. .....
ofe-d~ 0~ .y
7iJ
(j).
..J.L-~
t, --1- C;.2-
~ ,...1-1~ ~
~
..~~~
(r1 ~~~
,
~
,It) ~/~J;2
WE THE UNDERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHIIBILITIITION JIND RECOVERY HOlfB FOR THE DRUG AND IlLCOHOL
DEPENDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE II DunPING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
-~ ( ;1:1/<(2..
4ddt 0<4
9iJ
'--~.'A
L::.- - / .O? '7
/ /-----'
I
I
6t,tl~
~
JI
,
WE THE UNDERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHltBILITATION IIND RECOVERY HOII1l FOR THB DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DEPENDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE A DlDIPING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
%'-'
~)
51'
DATE NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE SIGNATURE
..
/1( 0, 0 0 ~~ X /
, "Y)
~ .:~~ /c::,-~_....__..<A--
S~ C-
o " ' I
5/;5 " c/'..t ;'-I/r-' /. ,
.
,..)" . --... ',. /........ i
('
i/25 /
M Ilil
" ,-<v,z:IJ7f:.,
. -.J.. .j ,X;I-<-""t'u",;
" , Ci..,
,
;:"/ 0
,7/,~:; .
/ .
a, .),"l".. ';;("J /"(>
5/').,':> ,,") ;) .,
It
~y
51d ';/1.3- .
~dt,-T
(;"j;;L,) '(2 c.
,,"1 'z.
-" ~e.$~
',- ]
It") ~
/
'iJ.-r;;N~ s: /b..fl-2 ' ~:;
~ /~~Z
/ '-'
I
" J/Jl
) );; ,,/ '/? 1/ 1
~ 0". 0 ", .ud!..'-"l,o
~J-;)~! V ''tIC 1?1 Co<-;(,~;h
;is 5~ I
.J ,/, . / ,
<, /
" )
I . . , .i
~ ,', ,/' ,. " 11c.,
0' " . "
~;
~_>-..L.., _ ~
-,", ---__,;L~
, .
b~~",~
II,!
Pt.:~ ~
-:::> /
J E:Lt.L"" (
-) ~
......L-('t.-" L .L_,<--,
~
rl /Ct1L
.. ./:1' .%) () ,
r,1 l....._d,A-Y~.L-.-../.
o ,
;, I / .
77' / l'" .Y~~,-
1",~2-<_
_F~4--7,' ,
-' \ j
/
a~1-
U
,
~ ICt7Z-fZ-<.~)
/'
~.
,
:><)/<1;
)
/c;', /-.( L/
I .
I
I
WR THR UNDRRSIGNR OPPOSR THR LOCATION OF THR
REHABILITATION AND RECOV1lRY H01tB FOR THll DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DEP&ND&NTS AT 3 NORTH SRCOND AVENUR FOR RRASONS OF SAFRTY,
WRLFARR, WRLL-BRING, SRCURITY, PRACR AND RNJOYMRNT,
ESTHETICS, AND THR RCONOMIC PRESRRVATION OF THE VALUR OF
HOMES IN THR NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NRIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BR A ~ING GROUND. THR CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USR PRRMIT FOR THIS PROJRCT.
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
.,
v
t-
1
7X O-~-UL c':/ 'l'
~ ,",(7
7'~---/ .~ . .dr--//~/' .
l " -' /'" ~'-""'L-
(
., I
. ,
5-.)<) <"'1;}
.:;, -2-:> g l
,/~
/'Z---. ///.,. . .....
( C/;t-c C C {!---C;; .
l:)-/)f:j-L1d
:;'~-dr;:9'
,1 /\ "'
" / ! ,'r c'
(- div12<'i. )\CVV\~
~
.I;J '~5?'?
/CJ
!
A./."> .c;/./;:.;..,
/j:..:-'CT (c-
V
"
~(j--~-
/'
_.~
~P5/i~
'/(,(Q
'( J..-to....V\..c.-7/H' C lZ~/"-(', ~
19/0
'2;,?
~L.f( ~7f.. -v{ <)
5. ~ ') . 'h.
~h?;f?-.
('f
?:?7~ r~
IL
if ;;,Gjcr J-
o
. -.?' . J.~
hJ.....,--(.~ /\ I
Q~~<t... c.{v~~
_0'-110 -<1
v'L
'1f()
5,2(., -11-
q
~~ (:(.w~
(
- 'f.' "j ')
..... -' \J ,;-
l-
/1,.1(,
'c/ I()
~
. r'
,~,<-"'- T'ujuQ(~1
...- .
. /.e's
I
I
WE THE UNDERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
RliHItBILITATION AND RECOIIBRY HOJIB FOR TH/l DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DBP&MD&NTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE A DUlIPING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIQNATURE
. , '// /0.~'~~~.~.~'
. jf'yKc r J-~
c
/
.. ~
" //0/;; '~~d7(
f./j )1,;;
f;
.;(
C
i
'j
.:/)/ v . , if / (~J
:/rlh~' {1.. './~_-[~~ - \"
(}aJ;I U/J~
1
. '0-.",,';:- 'S:,~ ~
/-/[1'
'-I ~---
Go-I -l~
(
'-
~~~~~~<~
?--f-'72-
'/";;'// /y( ~
y/-o/ ~~
t-t'72-
.
LI ,'-' \ l '- (h.IL'~,,\
...i.-,[....-. 1--/.
t///9z..
c, \ 1 \""~
j. ~,.
;.~./:l4~/lV
\.{ ~t)"lt[
{;
10- \/ (,~
,-VbvJL . ~
~ -I - q 1-
flJ...hn ~
c;' -1..3 &,
I
I
WE THE UNDERSIGNE OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE
REHABILITATION AND RECOVBRY HOlI1l FOR TH1l DRUG AND ALCOHOL
DBPBNDENTS AT 3 NORTH SECOND AVENUE FOR REASONS OF SAFETY,
WELFARE, WELL-BEING, SECURITY, PEACE AND ENJOYMENT,
ESTHETICS, AND THE ECONOMIC PRESERVATION OF THE VALUE OF
HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD NOT
BE A DUlfPING GROUND. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA
SHOULD DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
DATE
NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE
SIGNATURE
Cth h,;t
0'41\\4 I\'~) r~
o
~ !1/CfJ
0't2.
(pI) }ttz.
)
lili~..lvvL.
1/
(P/'JA.~
G'\\CJ:t'
w. / '! :J--
CJ
(:/fA
~;w/d1.
1
-I??
- /
(~
~.
File No.
PUBLIC HEARlNG CHECK LIST
ClTI COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARlNG DATE
nw, r -?J n, i'"') " \ I~
SUBJECT (i'<Y,-'-l i - :'::,'1 .'~c-""~J..~..J.;.-.~j ',,-,\.,,-:;;' J.A
~,",J-Jc-'
\ (\
'(~) 9- '<: ,c, ,)
, ~ i
, _', I. .
.~,....' liII'Lf'J...lJ,\
(~\,(..J:Xw ". . L
LOCATION :c.
\,i"'r-_Q_\~--'.~Q_
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION -- BY FAXi/ ; BY HAND
1/' --
PUBLICATION DATE ":'.jCf d.. '-'2-
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTI OWNERS~~' elf.. c t, ,.':
; BY MAIL
NO. MAILED
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Sui(e F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK .S/Ji.>!r12
COPIES TO:
Administration (4)
Planning
Originating Department
Engineering
Others
City Clerk's Office (2)
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
.58.
\c - I))K
) ,.
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING
BY THE CHUIA VISTA CfIY COUNCIL
CHUIA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public
hearing to consider the following:
Appeal of the Design Review Conunittee's decision to
conditionally approve the sign design for the freestanding pole
sign submitted by Firestone Real Estate proposed to be
installed @ 830 Broadway.
PCC-92-17: A request for a conditional use permit to operate
a Head Start Child Development Preschool Program @ 345
Fifth Avenue in R-3 - Zoning District - Episcopal Community
Services, South Bay Head Start.
PCC-92-34: A request for a conditional use permit to allow a
60-bed drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery center @
3 North Second Avenue in R-3 - Zoning District - Victory
Outreach.
Adopting amendments to the Cardroom Ordinance, including
but are not limited to the following: consolidation and
transferability of existing cardroom licenses; games permitted;
hours and days of operation; types of bets and wagers
permitted; charges for game playing; signage requirements;
and, other related rules and regulations. Council will consider
related amendments to the City's Master Fee Schedule.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, June 2, 1992,
at 4:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at
which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED:
May 20, 1992
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
\C)-iYl
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CHULA VISTA FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING PCC-92-34: A request
for a conditional use permit to allow a drug and alcohol
rehabilitation and recovery center. The project is to be located
at 3 North Second Avenue in the R-3 Zoning District. A plot plan
and legal description are on file in the Planning Department. Any
petitions to be submitted must be received by the Planning
Department no later than noon of the hearing date.
An Initial Study, IS-92-30, of possible significant environmental
impacts has been conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
A finding of no significant environmental impact has been
recommended to the City Council by the Planning commission and is
on file, along with the Initial Study, in the Planning Department.
If you wish to challenge the City Council's action in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the Commission at or prior to
the public hearing. Call 691-5101 for further information.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING
June 2, 1992 at 4:00
Building, 276 Fourth
be heard may appear.
Chula vista Planning
WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday
p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services
Avenue, at which time any person desiring to
A location map is on file with the city of
Department.
DATED: May 15, 1992
CASE NO.: PCC-92-34
\Cj-IL\L
~ '.
(0
. " ':. ~
..
. .
" ,
- .
'.-
"I
-~,. ......
-1.;)
:L-J-']l-' ... ....
: / <::tJ ILJ~\\ '
. . I
. 0
,
~~
fA
"~
...
.'
....
i....
.
~
~
~~.
'-
-- '" '.r" .
~",' ~~, "~
.-' , ;.a~ ......'
<0 'i ~"'P<o II - ~-~~
-."-- "-'If ~ O~~. :
\ h'~ Q ~
SF ~~~ ~E"T ~ ~
\Y" ~ ~ /1,.<<.4o.!14lH /4
~~~~. It~
_ rr r KOA 0
r - F 1
~~~, ~ '\ r Q
I"R'~ ~
I- I~
~ -
II
I
.
.
-
~ ;
-
- .
-
~
~,V~1l _
-a.4
~V'F"
~
~1
~%
~~
tV
~-
Till
D<;l I ~.~
1- J . ( ~~.~ .)
eft N-nin~ ( pa - '12-- SA--)
~
I
-
- v .
m::r: ~." _ ~i:: J
. 'LOCATOR
. vlvTt?~'r' PLJr~ "0 ~
fZ.o~ I DE::l.JlIlA&,.-~II,..I'TY. ~
DI2JJ" . ~~" ~v f!.~HA&II.I'M-l
~~t> ~G y i,
\c) ~ I q !
~-......_...~-
570U2(;",,00 "70020,,luO
EoCHlPTUS GRO"E INTERNATIONAl ~UCALnT"S GROVE --:1!1::fONA1.
CliULA VISTA CI 91910 CHUL. 1910
570(;20" 700
F.RKIAG AUTriORITY Of THE CITY
OF ~ATIONAL CIT, CALIF THE
iO ~. - --...... ...-.-
XATIO~AL CITY CA 91950
~-
....__...~._---'-
570~110"00
r-ONARliE" SILVAW(j/E~ILIA
- .
CliULA VISTA Ca 91910
-'.c:.c
0.' :L(
0(; ,I
o. ( :C
: 0 (:: 1 570~110bOO
c. t( .aRhS JOE~ D
O (' ." - u.___ -- --
o ' . CbUlA VISTA Cl
O&CJC
\
\
I
"', ','.r-~' "
,'01,,(
.0,'.
, "9;" "'~
,oc 1
,~I:r
lOr.-J
_'-.0 .. L1(
91910
570~111200
ESTE-BAN liO/E.Dl:;W
--- --
CriULA VISIA Ch 91910
570311100(;
ROLDE~ THO~AS i/KI~EE~L, 5
- - - -
CliUlA VISTA CA 91910
5703120300
CCR~EY AOEE~T G/KARc~ A
... -~.
CliULA VISTA Ch 91910
570~120,,00
EDWbRDS RkL.H A/DEBORAP. A
1 TI _ II
CriUlA VISTA CA 91910
5703121200
RUD0Y LEON/JESSICA
1 1 -.
CriUlA VISTA CA 91910
5703121000
PLASCENCIA RObERTO
1 I I I
CbUlA VISTA CA 91910
570~122000
TCRUZ RODOLtO P/PATRICIA
"Ii ______ .11
CHULA VISIA CA 91910
,703110100
fERNANDE~ CELESTINO/,OLA~DA R
_ _ 1
CHULA VI~TA'CA 91910
~7031105uO
hOOVER D~USHEL D/JAC~UITA A
, .-
CEULA VISTk CA 91910
.-- ----
~7031109(;0
UQTIUGA R~~Pft J/SUDELLE ~
1!'f. __ II.
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
-
57031113uO
I~ITH JA~ES P/liELEN b
CEUL~ VISTA CA 91~
~ I SUE B
91910
,703120"uO
.OLF ~aRSHALL h/"OCO~RO
J .~
LHULA VI~TA CA 1910
~7031209uO
VILLALVA"O ALEJANDRO
C/O RAPH~EL VI~L~LVAZO
--., -..
CHULA VIS A CA 91910
~703121300
DECK~AN DA~IEL J/LYN~ W
. --
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
57031217uO
SIi tAMI1Y TiUST Ob-l"-91
. __u
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
,,703122100
CHUIDIAN E~ILIO O/RUSTICA b
CHULA VISTA cl 91910
5703122"00
KliIKSCIUHS
. ,- I
CHULA VISTA
GYTIS/~(;NIH
--
Ck n 91 0
5703122500
(nCOi JONI C
CHUL~ VI~TA CA 91910
, ,~
\ h--Il)'.:::J-.
.
.
..
..
..
.
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'!"l!!!!'
~. ec.c:>> .
o. ( lI:
0(.')
o. C. .
0(:1)
a.ell.
. O(~( 1! .
(. 0 .. c:;l(.
\
\
/ J
~"('r' .
101:t'-
Att.]
_ ;:0;41 ... g
. ,,:oe-.1
'01 s: lI:
.(KI.
~.;;o .. '(..1(
\.c:.. . ! ll")
--.J-' ---)
--......--. ----.~--
. J
.
5700203700
~LA HK EN SH IP
... -
CiiULA VISTA
DEWAYNE
CA 91910
.
.. ....,_...--- -
-- ....- .~--- -_._--~-
__._._~_.._m_
-----"'-----'--',-'----'--
.
5 70 0 2 04 50 0
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
- -- -
SAN DIEGO, CA 92123
.
____~_~~_=-=._:.::L~=_.....;:;:..:.~.~
5703110200
NIcr:ERSON KENNETH/PATRICIA
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
57D3110600
!!IZRACHI JIlICHAEL lO/PAULETTE E
. . __.._w" u
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
..
.
5703111 00 0
~ORGH HCEAEI~MAUA
. - .. . -" .. .-
~OUNTUN VIEW CA S4040
J
.
5703111400
CAMPBELL ECGH H/SUE B
- . - --
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
57031 20100
lURGESS l"ARTF.A L
"_ .f
CiiUlA VISTA CA Sl910
.)
5703120500
LANDELL LUZ E P
.'.U r
CHULA VISTA C 91910
5703121000
LAFERiIERE DORIUS A/C&ARLUTTE
J
~ Ii - ----
C&ULA VISTA CA 91910
5703121400
JOHNSCN JAVIERSBEATRIZ C
.J..,JV .... v...._. _ 8
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5 70 31 2180 0
!!ENDEZ CARLOS
II . .J!
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
...
,..
5703122200
VALENTINE GEORGE GjiliIHFRED l"
:ps ..._ _ _
.... "T~"" T''''''- ""' ,.. ~ ("\.. n.. (\
--_......:...-
57 00 ~O 3800
~ATZEK JA~ES JjRUTH b
.--. -
CBUL. VISTA CA 91910
'~_:-_-- - -.---
SA Iii
_._----~.~-------- --
--_....._.-'-"'---~_._._-,_._.. --~-
5703110300
IGUChI IS Eli TR
_.~- -'
CHULA V ST. d 91910
-T_._____'__..,.......u..-,-~.-.".-".......,....-..---
---~.._-----_..__..~_.._~--_._- ._-_..~- .
./
,
,703110700
RUIZ !!ARIO E/ROSALIA
r -.~ -"
CHULA VISTA ~A 91910
1'-
57031111C0
liInE.R HAZi.L C
CHuLA VISTA CA 91910
5703111500
HIiLLR GORD01 ./DETT~ L
CHULA VISTA CA 9191b
5703120200
~eI SOICHl/MIE.
CHOLA VISTA CA 91910
5703120700
TERRi INTE. VIVOS TRUST 04-1t,
31
. -
CHULA VISTa CA 91910
---_=~:~"7~~-
5703121100
DICKIE JON D/NANCY S
-
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5703121500
FHI JOH~{~GI
-, ,
CHULA VISTA CA
TRUST
91910
5703121900
~"o tf~pt~a B
CHULA . A . 91910
5703122300
LE L. TORRE. JO~EfI~A
GOLFO DE CORTES ~134
1 I . - -- - "lj
r l
\
\
/
. -........-.~..,_c. _"_'_,_'..._,- ...._~_~.,..-.-_,~.'_ ___"-"__.;......._.v.'""""".~._..~
--.I......:....
5,,6~203200
JETER JACK C/~I~DA J
... _ 1 ..._
CEULA VISTA CA 91910
5663203,,00
AhRENDT RGBERT ./MELI~SA L
..- .~. ...-
ChULA VISTA CA ,1910
J/PB YLLI S K
91910
5663301900
B~aDIC~.ALLEY R
I, _ , UI!"'I!!IL_
ChU~A VISTA CA 91910
5063302300
EEN~Eli JE1F~El A/CARO~ E
ChU1A VISTA CA 91910
5663303900
iU~i:RO FAUSIO I
CEULA ViSTA Ch 91910
506~304jOO
liliS~ELL ROBERT E/DIANE LISA
.. .
ChulA VISTA CA 91910
5063304700
HLISTR IE~I
-- ...- -
CEULA VISTA
hAllK/ThEliESA
CA >1910
..., 566 3J 0110 0
-.. . C'", .NuHIS IdLLIAII
(.... - .
0.' ;C' ChULA VISTA CA
Olle:>>
o. (~.
o(:CI
a.c.
Ot: (.
o & cJt.
,
~ '. r:r1t:
n.~<{.-~' ... .~~_.
.OJ:.. 5i>6330510q ..
nt"..~ l .',>A"O~ HU~.BJ:.RTO Jli
" '~I .".
~~O.(. . C;';ULA VIS CA 91910
'0.3: J
.<'IX
.0&<..11
\ /-
'. ..
, ,,~
i '{'I
566~305700
KliU~E CAROLYN A
-
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
570020310(;
COU~TY OF SAN DIEGO
SAN DIEGO, CA 9:<123
57002030,00
~
C;';ULA VISTA CA
L
91910
CHU
~6632037UO
KORT TI!::C TR
1 _
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
::>663301200
LAKER AN.AEEL ill
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
::>663302000
HECl:. ROSE~ARY
~A VbTA CA
91910
o,6633024UO
~ALUTA RONALDO S/EMILY K
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
~6633040l,0
GLIKO LAiRY J/JEANINE M
-
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
:>663:J044CJO
~OnNSON "ANA G
~AN DIEGO CA 92121
::>663-,048uO
~
CHULA VI"TA CA 91910
-'603305300
hA.KINS DOUGLAS A/ANGELA ~
..-
CHULA VI"T! CA 91910
5663305800
BL GAR CCNST~OCTION CO~P INC
C/O RAI!Ir: S R~FILI
~AN DIEGO CA 92159
5700203200
CHEVRON USA INC
C/O G t LAG~ER/PROPERTY
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120
TAXES
::>700203600
bLANK ENSliIP
K_ u.~_.
CHUU vr-,TA
DCNALD R/PATRICIA
~
.
CA 91910
J
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
"
..
..
.
-.
-.
.
..
..
..
.
.
'f "
- . C.C1
o. (x "
o (:II
00.( f.:' ·
0.''-
O(::l{'l .
l.O&(.,l.(;,
\
\
~.
,
~b..W ~
:.oJ: II
.ni"" ,.
.':01'. 1
"0'. I
"_1: .. J
-O.."t.l( ,.
)('-llI\'
.~
.
5663203000
DAN G EEIDCA N KH UY EN
.&.....~ - - ~ --. - ..~ -
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
-
--~--_..._.~---- -~._~...
..
5663203400
JETER JO ANN
. - - --...~..-
- .
CHULA VIsrA CA 91912
..
5663300400
{E'~OrT EUGENE CIBONNIE B TES
CEULA VISTA CA 91910
5663301300
~TSY E
CHULA VIsrA CA 91910
, I
5663302100
HUSSE, ~ICP.AEL S
.
C!iULA VISTA CA 91912
5 663302500
HELBIG HARLEY L
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5663304100
HODGE IVAN SIAL ICE G
- - .
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5663304500
H ARDI I.G CEARLENE B TR
- _.
C!iULA VISrA CA 91910
5663304900
VREDENBURGF. JANICE L
11
ChULA VIsrA CA 91910
5663305500
KERlorT EUGENE CIBONNIE B
"I ''H~
CHULA VIS A A 91910
5700201700
CREASER PHIL TR
l-
CHULA VISTA C A 9191 0
5700203300
~J
.~.~._.........~....'__.~ __.i",~'_
.. .._.L.
5663203100
~F
~CA 91910
5663203500
IHCMfSOI/ SCOTT
.1. . .
CEULA VISTA CA 91910
5663300500
SChMITT .ILLIA~ RINORA
I _
CHULA VISTA CA 9~910
5663301500
CAhIGNAI MARIA A
L.. ..
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5663302200
J\UO HAUKE
'!L --
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5603302700
hCKISSACK IIMOTnY J/JA~IE L
CHULA VIST~ CA 91910
5663304200
NORGARD JOhl/ZULADAWI
CHULA VISH CA 91910
:'>663304600
CLAYVILLE .A,IE LIDIANA L
CHULA VIST~ CA 91910
5663305000
URREA RICHARD E/~ARIA 5
CHULA VISTb CA 91910
- --------.- -----.~_...-.
-,--:__,~"L'-,
5663305600
~SCA.O RAY/.IKI L
~RII~S
CARL;;,BAD ClI. nooo
______... ..-c____,_________.___.,~.._.,,__
---- --' -,~
5700::02900
~ E/NORP,A V
~ 91910
~7 00 20 34 00
SAM
.~
.. ..... I
~ .
566~001400
~~ARIAELENA
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
566J0023C0
tIlPS RlllhD
SAN DIEGO CA 92109
,ecc' ~~~ige4gg~A1D II
o. X ',C C!iU1A VISTA CA 91910
~-' 0 U l .
o. (:C
:' 0(:<-1
o. t'C 5,,63005000
..,0 (:, II iWfiS HOU" S
O&~C SAN DIEGO CA 92139
\
\
r'
~
'r-..r'~
.lOt::;'
:;:;0;< X
_iD~!.t
.:>>n
.~, :4..71." ~'.
' ,ler JI(
",,'O"C. .
5 66 3005 300
~HRLE ROB-tRT
CHU~A VISTA CA 91910
5663005700
fD~!.N HILDA V
BONITA CA 91902
5663200200
JINLRt FA~ILY TRUST Of
- ...
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
:..991
5663200600
EIGGIWBOTliAa JOhN T/THE1~A M
C!iULA VISTA CA 91910
5663201uOO
BANAGA PETE J~/VELIA M
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
=- 5663201500
GRAUDUSliUS LOIS A
_u.. _
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
s;- / I~k
5063202:..00
.-ARAE!; JULLANH
--- -
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
5t6,202600
JONES ROG!.R WAYNE
__~. __. _,u
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
_____L .
I
~663u02000
.ILTON REVOCABLE TRUST 06-16-1 .1t
5
c;g SIGRID W~TR
MULA VI~TA-CA 91911 .
:,663003600
BEASLEY FLOYD R TRUST 03-15-9J 4t
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
.
:'603vO~7uO
AGUILLARD JOSEPP. L/~ARTP.A .
C3ULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
~66300~lUl
J'ETERS BYRON J
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
.
.
56630054uO
~R
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
56630058,,0
clAUE.STEIN CARROL B lEVOCAbL~
tRUST 01-27-!l.9
~AN LI~G0 CA 9~101
.
.
56 6n003 uO
~VIAl'i
CP.ULA VI~TA CA 91910
.
.
:>663200700
~tAi GERALD E -N
rlU~TINGTON B~ACH CA 92646
.
.
56632011UO
5TU~PF FAMILY TRUSI 11/30/89
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
56632016cO
L01IA TO.Y J/VIRGINIA E TRS
CHULA VI~TA~A 91910
i'
.
.--
~663202500
IIARCUM IILVA I
C3ULA VISTl C~ 91910
.
'.
~663202900
STUMPF MLRPHY L/CAROL R
""".
CHuLA VISTA CA 91910
.
~
\C~, 1\1/1
\ --' . ;
""'!!II!!!.
cec.d
0-. 1- ~c
, 0 < ; C) .
c.(c
( o<:Cl
(0.''- .
,0<: CJ
C 0 & e..~
\
\
/
,,' (.
',,"ec.n
_'n -. w:cI
,:_0 ~(1) <.
~ ':0:-1 '"(~
" ;~.~~
:",_l.r J[) (.
(.>o."ex
~-~"""~-'-"'-
...
.
5663000800
TERASIiER HOHHY L/KEIKO
CHULA VISlA CA 91910
.
.
5653002100
RUSSEll JACK ./EETTY 1
Illu .-
~LA VISTA CA 91910
.
,
5663003700
~AY JOY C
-- ~ -. --_.
CHULA VISTA
CA 91510
5663r~800
~
~A 91910
.
.
5663005102
~J
~i,
91910
.
.
5663005500
HO.'i,RI JUES R/CHTEIA
~?
HULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5663006000
HAUENSTEIN TeO~IS G/C1RROL H
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
.
.
5663200 "00
GaOLS bY PRt f
~EULA VI~TA CA
91>10
56632C0800
~
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
'.
5663201200
.GARAY FEDERICO F/bERTEA !!
. 1......1. J
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5663201700
RA~ S P iiJiJ;h
LAKESIDE CA 920"
.
t
5663202600
BOARD JACK S/LAURA
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
}
5663000900
~ELIhl ARTliUR. I,/IRENE C
-
CHOLA VISTA CA 91912
56t3U02200
~AIEN~A ALFONSO/GLORIA h
CHOLA VISTA CA 91910
~663003800
THOr-AS JAMES L/GERI K
-
CHULA VISTA CA 91912
_,.__..... _.n___.."
_.._.__~..__.____ ~...___.. _n_._
566300"900
.EST HAR.~eNNE M
._.!I~!:.
I bO/HlA CA ,1902
~6 63 00 52 00
~]O EGIlt R ICEAED
~ .
CE UIA VIST I, CA
L
~10
5663005600
1A010YO CA1ALIhA
IM~EAI~L BeALE c1
91932
5663200100
~EYDEL FRED/CARL~ L
ton"'A CA ,1902
5663200500
~l~bi JAI~E R/DOLOAES ~
CEUIA VISTA CA 91910
5663200900
BRiESE RiUBEh V/NOBUKO
.n .
CHULA VIST. CA 91910
5663201300
LODDS NELLYE Ii
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5663201800
~OLL'ND EDhATA_
CHOLA VISTA CA 91910
5663202700
LOARL JACK S/IAURA
CBOLA VISTA CA~91910
"',
,
"
\ s~ " '-I Y,
. St.62B04900
~ JORDON BRACK L/NANCY A
('. C,LI ~cULA VI~CI. 91910
0-. J ,;;C
~ 0 ('...
'O.,'fc
( 0 ( : (I
o. (C-
0(:: I
CO.. t,!;~;
\
\
/
.,r ....'r.._.~. ...
~n.~,
:;O;t ;'(
:.nit1',
,. ";:G',{.'-;rJ
~~~(~ ~Wj
~..Q"C~
-"---
.. _~__' . J
S66~8vl00()
BLSEK JOH~ ri JRISDSI& E
CHULA VISTA Cl. 91910
:>602001100
~SR/JO ANN
~ 91910
.
.
5662802900
CbULA VISTA
iT
CHULA VISTA
S662bO~100
CORNEJO ERNES'rO
S
- ---
CHULI. VISTA CA
.
CITY SCHOOL DIS!R~
A/PURIFICACIOI .
9191 0
CA 9201G-
-
:>662805100
LUSHER JOHN F TR
. -
CHULA VI~TA CA 9"9~a
.
.
".-,--..---..-.
SH2805600
ll~iT<.R l":ASI0~ ..E/GRACE
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
S662605900
CO.E~~~I!H/LEILAAI ~
--~.
hARRISBU~G VA 22bOl
.
T TRS
.
5662910200
JHOpS ~tJT S/EVO~H Ii
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
5602910300
hUDOLPH ISOEEL D
-
CHwLA VI~T1 CA 91910
.
.
5662910600
fAOULX GEOR~E<<~
ChULA VIS!A CA 91910
S6629107(;0
hOGAN ~A1COL,,/CONSTANCE
J ..
CHULA VI~TA CA 9"910
.
.
5062911000
'1Z PAThICIA STEVE
S6629111 vO
OLSON GRANT G'TA~AkA L
. L.!
CHULI. VI~TA CA 91910
.
n.u LA
!A C.. ,1910
'.
5062911400
ZSKIS JOSEi!! H
CHULA V~STA CA 9 9
5662911500
<,CCUliLEY i:ARO THY ~
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
566 :<91lbOO
IoiHIn<.Y V<.R~ON
~CA
:>662911900
ZU.IGA J~SuS/HARIA I C
~A 91910
'.
L/ANITA
91910
.
5062920100
LLEDY KENNETH C/LORlNl !
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
:>6629202 (;0
rl~'hM LUPITA C
, -
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5662920500
H.B"?T~ AiiNU~/JEANNIN.E;
CEULA VISTA CA 91910
S6629209vO
IGUCHI KIYOKO
CHULA VISTA CA
91Y~
.
.
S66~000400 S663000700
~ERH.Dtz ALFONSO II/CHiiISTIN" LEYS~GONZALES
- ---
S15 DIEGO Ci. 92129 S CHULA VISTA CA 919~
GuADALUPI.
(
"
,
Ile,,____ 1\1 CI
---,' !' \
....
cec:,ej .
0.'1[
: 0 ( tel
(Oo.(~!i ·
o.c..
(,0 (: () .
C 0 & c:.o1t
\
\
/
... ,-
_ib.~~li.
-o:()[)
:~rZ~
, ..' J[ 1
(.0..'(..'
-------' "",._- --,-,----.",.-- -. j,
J
-"-'..........."'.....-----
.
5 66 28 00700
HALL RONALD DjPATfrICIA D
-
CHULA VISTA CA 9191G
.
.
5662801200
RUST 11-05-90
CHULA jISTi CI 91910
.
- ----
.__.._~_.__._._-
5 66 2 8 03 600
~LjNANCY A
ChULA VISTA CI 91910
5662805200
STERLING FAMILY TRUST 11-13-8j
-
NE~PORT BEACH CA 92663
.
.
l
56630D0200
~~ETT RCpRT
rJ.;:TlT.! UT~"" rn
EijCHIYCKO
q1 Q1 n
5662 bO Db VO
RUSSO iRkNK A/JULE A
'I
CHIJLA VISTA CA 91910
5662601300
tiC Gj.AD~L !l(JBERT E
CHULA VISTa CA 91910
,
-,---_.. -----"
5662004800
~H\;LA VISTA C
SCHOOl. DISTli:
CHULA ~ TA CA 92010
----- -
--------..--
5662605700
tCjOE.NfELD H~RBEH A/~J.RY E
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
D
CHULA VISTA CA 9191
5662910500
",~ANSOli iiALPh E/AU,.A ~
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5662>1 09 DO
~~G~ G/JEANhE1TE E
CEiULA VISTA CA 91910
5662~117vO
liIO LUClLA
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
0662 91 ~1 00
iiAGL1N RAYIOID F/REIKA H TiU~
~
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
S6 62 92 04 00
~ALAZAR AN~EL S
CHULA VIST~ CA 91910
5663000300
~A~N~if iOBE~T,F./ChI,OKO
CHUT.A VIST;;, CA 91910
"J
,
; -' \ --A
)i-~_ jj l)
.....
-ec.d
O. J .:C
o(:()
o.(&:
( O(:CJ
o. (~
'01:( >>
O&~
\
/
566~5i3000 ~6625131uO
FAlaFIELD Fb~ILY TRUST 06-19-~ FAIRFIELD F
1 1
r
LONG BEACH CA 90815
~~~...,..,.._-'"--_.,._,-~----_._--
5e62503900
BEC~Ea FA.ILY TRUST Ob-30-90
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
5662504300
.EL~H GEORGE ~/REGI~A C
---
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5662510200
CARRIE:DC RUoEN
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5662510700
~ERCADO LEOPOLDO R TR
C/O HOY-ETO.A BPS REALTY
1!'!I!l _ r
SAN DIEGO CA 92139
5662511400
~ACIEL MA~UEL/AURELIA J
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
566~511bOO
SALAZAR JESUS/A~DliEA
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5662512500
jILGEi' IHESi~CO
..
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
'~'er-
}U . :1
.OCI
iD". ',(
.':OI I
'O.:'f-
'J. (' J[ I.u..- .,. ---_'____
~O..~x: 566~513bOU
~,"E:.ICZ TERRI/CAnDIE
~A VISTA CA 91911
1991 H
566~514tOO
ORT lZ FIDEL
-.
CliULA VISTA
l'1
CA 91910
5662800500
ECKES Gbli~ 6/PATRICIA J <DVA>
, --
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
~.....
~6625040uO
BROWN BOzB' L/~ANCY J
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
- j
.
..
,-
~6625044uO
CHILLINSKY AGNES
--- -
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
.
.
~6625103(;0
SIMONS TBESlTA
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5662:'>109U0
LACHANCE FRANCIS E/RITA A
~CA 91910
..
.
:'662511500
CLARK DAVID L/TERESITA
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
..
.,
5662:,119uO
JASSO ~AliCO A/LETICIA C
~91950
.
.
S662512600
i'jQTT-KOF "O~
I
CHULA VI;,TA
CAli01Y~ L
~A 91910
.
.,
ilLY TRUST 06-19-! .
LONG
AU! CA 90815
.
5662513SUO
SOTO FERNANDO C/CARLOTTA A
1 ij~"---
CHULk IS CA 91912
'.
.
,,662514000
~liALA
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
'.
..
566251lt9CO
iNILLA-VALD~Z
C!lULk VI;,'rtllCA
OSCAR/TERESA C
91910
.
'.
S662800600
BLANKENShIP DONALD R/PATliICIA
P
~ 919i'o
.
.
.~ . ck:j
o. ca:
,,0 to'" .
0.(.
, ; o(~il) ...
1[0.'. ~
_O(~)
O&~
'II
\
\
/'
.
~"r..XJ.
~ot .. 1 .
_~,41..
.:"or::. 1
!G..I)[ ~
...r )[ ]
-. ;o..~.:
'.
\S ..,("\
-.-'.--'-,..-.................---
.
5 66 2 5 0370 0
DERT GAiY J/JDLIA E
CliJLA VISH CA 91910
.
,
5662504100
OBERSCRULTE KATHRYN L Ti <AI<.A
~R>
CHDLA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5662504500
SHEPHARD ~iLTER J/SAU~DRA L
I .
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5 662510400
IHGON ALFONSO/GEliALDINE AEVOC
1> BLE TE US 1....l.2-1 0- 90
. _'_' _!JIll'
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
)
5662511 00 C
~~~UiLS JA~ES P/LOLA F
liUt VISTA CA 91910
,
5662511600
SCHr,UCiiWENN..,S E/GECRGIA A
SAN DIEGO CA 92103
)
566251200 C
S!ITH GLENN EDWARC/JOANH 1'1
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5662512800
RELPH JOYCE
CRULA VISTA CA 91910
5662513200
BR)"N JAI'lES W/BETTY A
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5662513600
LA"SOI, ~ON L/NORlo.A J
EL CAJbN CA 92010
5662514100
KEALIFEE ZUIlAIR~HALA
CHULI VISTA CA 1913
5662515100
KELLY JA~ES B/JACCUELINE L
~ 91910
.... -a-.-__.__
, 1
5662:.03bOO
iiAi.Kf.R AUNY/Jt.nHEJi
CHULi VI~TA CA 91910
5662504200
LOPEZ VIRGINIA R LIVING TRUST
i-27-s.? 1
CHULi VISTA CA 91910
5662510100
CARRIEDO MARGARET i
~L.I. VlST~ CA 91910
5602~10500
~W
~ 91913
5662511100
IEJiFlLu CH.l.RLES H
~
~ CA 91912
5602:'11700
SAIVLS!RINI lEOMiS J
~ 91910
:,6b2S12100
GEl;, DOliALD
~h~lE C1.
E/D b\U> M
;2071
5602512900
COLE FAMILY TRUST 09-20-90
~9~910
5662:'13300
tEIOI. iiELE. INC
~9
!' :,662S13700
ROTH FRANK S/Ii~GARD E
VALLlY CENTER CA 92062
:,662:.142uO
KHALlfEli ZU' ~ hALA
CHULA VI~ b CA 91913
:,662bOCJ400
~IAM J/VELMA L
CHULA VIST;. C1I'- 91910
- aer.
o..!.
O(;Jl:l
0.(.
o ( :1:1
0.'.
.0 (:1{ ]
O&.~
\
,
\
~.
,
'~".-r:,.r;. (
._OJ ][ )
p. (41'~
.:DI. 1
"0..
..!tU .. J (
.0 .. 't.1[
- I~
'- _ c.")
. '\ , )---
-._._.._.'............-=-.--......0-...
,
5661520200
~A~
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
A as
,
,
5661521000
aA~KS iA~~TANYA L
CHULA VISIA CA 91910
,
\.'
566 2~02 70 0
PACIFIC HOl'ES
- -'~
WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364
C"
C"
5 66 2 5 CO 10 0
RIIFF Sli.}'EN It/TRACEY L
- - - -I....
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
\.-
5 6625 CO 500
ALVIN E liALPH R
CliULA VISIA CA 91910
5662500900
~
CliUU VISH CA 91910
5662501300
~KARE~ L
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
t
56625 C1 70 0
\DAMi JOH E/!lARY .ll
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
(
5662502100
~
CHULA VISIA CA 91910
5662502500
GALE iillil R
C liU L A V IS lA C A
91 91 0
566 2502900
~FjSAjjDliA J
om LA V IS II C A 91 91 ~
5662503300
~
CHULA VISIA CA 91910
~._._-_.._..~----_._.._-_..
S6 ol~20300
WECKI ANIEONVli~lE.
CHULA ~I~TA CA 91910
S661S21100
KliOS1\Y frbRD PjSALLl. J
CHULb ~ISTA CA 91910
5662..0~800
SOliTHLAND (CAP ThE
DALLAS TX i522~
5602500200
~F
CHULA ~ISTA CA 91910
5602500600
GUlA GLOliIA A
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5662501000
~U.KER KbRI ~ LESLIE R
. ULA ~ISTA CA 91910
566250 "" ~o
DRATtO. Ks.mEIli/THliRIAULI-bRA
10~ CEARl.EliE
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5662501800
HALL LEO E Jh/JE.El C
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~6b2502200
RENSoA. iO~ERT S/POilER SHIRL
'x ii
CHULA VISTA CA 91~10
jli!A~Y A
CHULA VISTA CA 91912
5662~03000
.ILSOK DAVI
(HULA ... Tb.
56 6250 3~OO
~I
~107
,
\~.- \
,'-,/ ,~::>
\--' ,._,,----.
-'
<- .....~,.__. - -- ''''-~ '::.~';""....... --,..".~-.".~".'~\'
5b6152040U
SbNDEaSGN ~AR1LYN L
^ - .-.. l'
CKULA V1STA CA 91 10
5t61521200
~AaDSO. DOROTHY A
CoULA V1STA Ck 9~0
... 5662402900
~. . c- cl ~ - ThE",T APAilTllnTS SITE
o_(~ .
0:_: ~~ ChULA V:STA CA 91910
0_ (ll 5662~g0300
.O(:{J~
O&~~10
566250070C
GilOOr.S JOE O/JANICE K
ChULA VISTA CA ~1~10
56625Cll00
~ll
CHULA VISIA CA 91910
\
.
\
5c62501500
ROSETTA BAN.ISTER FA~ILY TRUS~
ThE
~ING
~33566
/
5c625u1900
LEE JAC~UELINh IAKA SIEONIl
CriULA VISTA CA 91910
---...r-
. lO.~---'
~or: I 5,,625u2jOO
ni.lK~ ~iOSEhA"Y ~
. ;:0,(. 1~910
D.. ::r
.rx
~ G&- _u_
5662502700
.:O~WO.TH GLELN ~(ALICE ~ TllS
CKULA VISTA Ck 91910
5<62503100
iEVEU/DE~ift TRUST 10-10-91
SAN DIEGO CA 92~D4
5662503500
TiAIEi VIRGINIA ~ TRUST -- -
. .
T\ n ,.... "'.. I. ~ ...
__~._.~..___,...__....,~_.__'"~~...'...:..-'-.....-"-..i.... ...."".~,~"...'.<..""4 ..,.,~ . _.. t
~6"b209"O
~LICE 1
~10
~6624011uO
.ILLIA~S JA~ES H/JANE H
BONITA Ci>. 91900
~6b240.>OUO
iiO/\ lEO TR
~ERICA
~AN FRANCISCO CA 94137
~6,,25004UO
hUFF~AN ~AETliA J
.,..1
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~662~00800
GOLDU GLORIA
CHULA VISTA CA 91!10
'N
CRU1A VI~TA CA 91910
,,662501600
.ACHIER ~AgES E(DOllOIHA E
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~662,,020QO
VE ~ENGA KEITH L
II ,
CHULA VIS. A CA 91910
J
#'
:;;
I
OJ
01
O!
/""..
"
,
"
\...
(
'-.
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
:>662502400
~pE" BEl< S/CHDl (..;
~HULA VISTA CA 91910
'-',
5662502800
.ILSON DAVID F/WILSON SA.DRA . "
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
56025032,,0
,ALENZUELA RAY~OND E <DVA>
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~6625036 00
~iZ RHON C
CHULA VISTA CA 91~~1
"
"
,
"
-;;Jr" --..,
56613..3000
r.O~1Gu~ERY FRRD
CHUiA VISTA CA ,1910
50613L4000
OliLAU R DAL1{REbECCA A
.
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
5061JL4400
~UO F"HKE
CliU LA VISTA
CJ. ,1910
..
.(Jet
~f. 5661324&00
,.(.1l. 1 DELI.GUhDlA DIEGO/ENA B
C.(ll
'.(:J 1 CEUiA VISTA CA 9191U
c:.'CI
i.'''' J
O&(.;lC. 56613L5200
~G
CliUiA VISTA Ck 91910
'.
\
:fI'
f..(
t". .
'8Jt .
I..
~-
.... .
"""'...i
.~,,~
\ S- iSlf
566:;.325700
~.lJAr.S !f,ARI b
CEULA h~ CA
9191 C
56614U0400
ELNK ~A~ILL R/~C liALE-R~NK SAI
.DEA G
CHULA VISTA C6 91910
56614UI000
PHAIR Dj,VID Tli
L
CHULA VISTA CA ,1910
566..510100
SliIHbN VERA K
CliULA VISTA Ck 91910
56615..0500
LL01D HkROLD/r.I~NIE E
CliULA V:;'STA Ck 91910
5661510900
~"G~NHa JOliN S
M:"NG VALLEY
CA 91977
5661511300
WOOD ELEAJ;O~ k
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
_....:""'" ""
, . ;;, ,. ...,~'''; -",,- "'~ ...,.....--
.
~6oU2J7WO
hESKER CONSTANCE
--
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
..a
.,
a
5661324100
PENNINGTON JA~ES r./~AFALDA T 1 r.a
is ...
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
56 6U245 wO
hERNAKDEZ RALPh C/JULIE
CHULA VI5TA CA 91910
..
5661324900
CHOO ALL~N R{BAEBAliA A
CHULA VI5TA CA 91910
5661325400
~EGO
5B DrEG0, CA 92:"23
56613258UO
f.~S~ELL liARY-.l!
CHULA VI5TA CA 91910
~66140Q500
'LALO~EY PRISCILLA L IR
CHULA VI;,TA ~10
~6014011QO
j.b],KIN~Ml-!rt~~ a
CHULA 0
5661~102uO
KALER ~ILLLRL b TR
~u[~-U!~~!r.~l :~~O
w
w
a
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~6615106uO ..
KOLODZIEJ HE~RY E/FLORENCE <D1
A>
1IilIIIII' - - .
CHUlA VISTA CA 91910
56615110UO
DICKSON iR~RICK V/hADA M
1. .-
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
S661S201UO
KILCREASt G~ORGE L/~ARTHA P
CHULA VI5TA CA 919~
.
.
.
.
.
,
\S/ \S<
-~
~
-.co
O.tI
. : 0 (;[)
0.01
. 0 (~t1
o. ,.
0(:1)
LO&St
\
\
/
.~.. eX'.:
.!o.::r-.
;/C1;t Xl
. "D" i: j(
.::0<<:-.1
. 0:0. J[ 11
l8CJ[]
~.:o &1:....
.
5661323400
LUCERe RAY~OND V/ALICE F
" .
CBULA VISTA CA 9191G
-~
,-
5661323600
ZIEGLEI CHRISTIAN J/LINDA A
I!Iw .
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
,.
56613 24200
WANl PHILIP J/BACLETA
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~
~
5 66 13 24600
~_ULYSSES E/!!EECELES P
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5661325000
J OH N S EN D AN A K
.VISTA CA
9191 G
FAliILY TRU"T 1~
.
.
5661325500
~ROSS GEORGE AI',AYFAIil
VLNG ~-11-90
~ULA VISTA CA 91910
1990 L
.
.
5661325900
DE FORD HTEUR L/KAY S
.
CBULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5661400600
SHEPPARD GILBERT E/ARLEIE G
"l '
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~
~
5661401200
CbVANAKENNETH P{NANCY II
.v_ . .
ChllLA VISTA CA 91910
9
.
5661510 30 C
iiiJjfLY BCBBY L/JUNE E
CHULA VISTA CA 91510
)
. I
5661510700
GREGORY GEIIETT i/HELEN P
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5661511100
P EIRO TT UTHU I E
~
CEULA VISTA CA 91910
i
~6613235CO
.HITE DEHIS
ULA VISTA CA 91910
S6 61.:>2 39()0
pAuIlSIA AGAFITO R/R~SlE B
W. ~
CHULA VIST~ CA 91910
5661324300
, CEAD~ILK JA~~S E/ChRISTINE P
/~ ..,~ '
CHULA VIST!> CA 91910
f'
- -~--,-.~--"-~---7-'~""- ~..-'-'",,-_.''''-.'
--...----------- ._-_._~.- ...-.--...-..-.-
56613247UO
AU~B HYNi:. S/bETTY L TRS
-
CHULA VIST. CA 91910
.---..._~- -..--_....-
-- - - ----------...- _..
5661;'25100
DOHEtTY FllSCA A
1
TRACl CA 95376
5661325600
tAKHO ISA ~U.lHARU~I
CHuLA VISTA CA 91910
S6 6140 0100
~
CHULA VISTa CA 91910
QSi:.PHINE A
91
C
[,
_....~_..-~--
."~--.~-~~..-
5661401300
i!iTT~EI JOSEPH G/~AR_~ JO
CHULb V~91910
i'
S601~104UO
SlUT" HAZEL 11
CHeLA ~~l~c~' 91910
5661510800
PETERSON GEOIGE 1/ANbELINA
CH ULA VIST A CA 91910
56 ol~11200
SALCHE! JOIGE A/SHARON T
CH uLA VI ST A CA" 91910
,
I.
IS IS-/-o
or'. r.ij
10 . -ctr---'
.. ,,-.t....J 5b61.3:<2cOU
. .:Gr.'?r..L . MEO RObERT
.::or...f1 CHULP. VISU
:. ~.t :f lC
..r" XI
,-..ro.. . ex.
t.c.d
0-. ,(~;;
( 0(,
o. (;
( 0(: c
o.t(
.' '00 ~ :~~
\
\
/
.h-.._ ._.
5661224"OL
DhNIL0.ICZ 1HkDDEUS T/LuELLA
CHULA V.S1A CA 91910
v
5661311100
LoZZAiC FRANK/SUSAN E
CEULA VISTA CA 91910
5061320200
peEDY EVERETT [/BEATRICE
CHULA VIS1A Ca 91910
506:0.320600
MOl .HIT L(JOSEFlNA b
CHULA VISTA Cb 91910
5b6:>.3,,100c
CLP, .AYN~ b/GJlPYS D
ChU~A VISTA CA 91910
566).3:<1600
.~NCHELL LE~TLR GARLA.D/HELEN
CEULA VIS1A CA 91910
H/CONNI E k
CA 91910
5b6J.322~OO
VhCCfi~O DANIEL/JEAN
CEULA VISTA CA 91910
566.3n600
~ORr.r10 ED.ARD
~HULA VISTA CA 91910
5661323200
LAISO. VERNE 0/pONI1A J
~HULA VIS~CA 91910
-~
_..
LO G
91910
~6b13104UO
~A
~2112
~6013112uO
~AS
CHULA VISTA CA
A/JEAli G
91910
~6b13203UO
~KlbEATRICE
~ 9).910
~6b13207UO
SEGAL SHIRLEY
ftA VI~TA CA
-
91910
~661321HO
CHAS~AIN ~A5IE L
~
91910
~6613217UO
VOSS HEN liY R
~LA VI~TA CA
91910
5661322HO
~AKACH JLSE/SAAA E
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
~6613225vO
IOCApI A~ERI~AICORP)
CHULA VI~TA CA 9),910
,,661322900
CO.NEE INTER VIVOS TRUST
15-84
~CA 91910
~661.J2~3(;0
OSBOURNE ~ICfAEL L/RITA A
CHULA VISTA CA 919T8
...... j
.
.
.,
.
.
.
'.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
'.
E 08- .
,.
,.
.
""'"
c . c.C:J
a.l:'
.. 0 t r~!
O.c.
(' Ot:t,
o.t.ll
e. OO~:~
\
\
/
.
r..('~
.1011:-
:~OX.,
. ,nit X
..." -.- _. 1
:0(.,
!O;,.
. .-rI'
~,-- ~
~.;o""(.,,
\~ ~. i C::1.
J ,J -
.-..... J'-.
.
5661224000
JENSE~ OSKA" T/ALn
_ u. ..'_
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
"'-...--..--.... - -....-.
5661224100
PEkRY f;KILY h
L
CHuLA VISTA CA 91910
.
~6 6131 0200
AGE. .r" CBAHLS E/DGL0RLS V
EL C.JO~ CA ~2021
.
.
56613 10500
DE LA FUEKTE BUSINESS PARK INe
Ii ii' .
~AN DIEGO CA 92121
.
8l
566131090 C
H~DSON WNW J/ELLEN
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
IIIDVA I
~
.
IS 1A
R
919lC
.
.
5661320400
CA~PBELL HMILY TRUST 02-Ll-9:
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5661320800
~ r-/VIliGINIA
CilULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5661321200
D HZ YOLA ND A
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~
~
5661321800
~CE/KAREN I
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
.
I't
5661322200
OIilBELLO LUIS II/lYRHII T
.
CARSON CA 90745
,)
>>
5661322600
CAZARES ALEJA~DRO/MARIA L L
.
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
,)
5 6613 23000
~T
~CA
J/SUSAN
9191 0
5661310600
.AhREN BETTH J
CHULA VISTi CA 9"910
S661~11000
~AT S/PAULA E
CHULA VIST.. CA 91910
5661320100
.J07~1:n n"JAHRG/HAU L L
CHULA VIST. CA 91910
5661:;20500
CAZAhES ALLJANDR0
~9191C
S6 61:,2 09 00
it[AD~.l.C" 11 A
CHULA VIS b CA 919:;'0
56 bl~213 00
~(;VAL~cg:~/HIR"NuI.A
CHULA vI5 a ~ 9~910
5661,,21900
UHLO. A K/"V1:LYN L
CHULA VmA CA 9i910
5661322300
ItAVlr ~~~tFG 1/JUIITA A
CHUL ~. CA 919:;.0
S661~22700
GIRDNER DEAN C
CHULA V~~A CA
JA/CHO.LYN K
91910
S661:;2.Jl00
!lUER~A Si:.RGIC,
,^,
CHULI VISTA CA 91910
.
56612:l.0~00
LEAL JO"GE :/JUllA "
CHUlA VISTA CA 91910
-
5661211300
~OR~iEHO
-
CHUlA VISTA CA 91910
"""" 5661220200
c. r.c. [OSS FUILY
0.' :L CHUL! hSTA
ou~J
O. (..'C
~ _ 0 (: (.
o. c.c
COt:')
(. a & e;,..c;:
....
\
\
'....-.., .~
~
/, [I
'\., .-(
J'
hUST 05-,,9-91
-
CA ,1910
5661220600
EEGALADO IS.DOE tESTE" R
CHUlA VI" CA ,1910
5b61221000
SIE.EET TIMOTHY A/ISABFL
~RING ~~~-~A'~~977
56612~1400
~
CHUIA VISTA CA 91910
5661221 bOO
AI~IROL LOUiDES S
~LA VISTA C~ ~191G
5661222::00
.....0. JOliN
CHU:'A V JTh
Ii Jin,HY
b ~1~1 C
5661223G00
~YIiDAil
~ 91910
5661223400
EliI;TOL DAVID ~/DEBiA L
~ 91910
56612~3600
~ P/lIAliY E
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5661~110,,0
~SHOKLA
CHULA VI~T~ CA 91910
~6612114JO
.ERNER DAVID/D~
"REA CA 92621
~6612203uO
~HAUF ED\;ARD/ROSA
CEULA VISTA !A 'D~10
.1 _ ...~ 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
~6612207uO
MM (lOIlISIO S/COIiCEPCION ( .
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~6tl.<21100
~l'1E Z liODERT R
C'ltLA VI~TA CA
Lno
.
.
.
~6612215CO
PETERSEN LEST!i P/FRANCES G TI .
S
CHULA VISTA -0 91910
~661221900
iiiiMOT~ RHEDIOS
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
'.
.
.
56612223uO
}lTCiiCOCK HfES E/SA:\DliA C :.
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~661~22700
FICK~l H~RiY H/I~A L
02-90
CEULA VISTIKCA 91910
..
TRUST 03- .
~6612231UO
LOYER. ALbEi
IELISABETH L
CA 91910
;'
c....r:.~....
~ )0 II'Z -- ----------
:~D;C::c 5661222600
,,,,,,,.. iIi/" ",m/m'" ,
.::0.'1:.3:] CbOLA VISTA CA 91910
. ~04:'! ..
....:r :Cl
'-;0 ,,'cX
~ If' ~
~...
~6612235uO
EVARTS WIL1IA~ R/~YRTLE f
CHULA VI 5T A CA 91910
~6612239G0
~ALAGO EDWARD L/~ARY F
CHuLA VISTA -0 91910
..
it
(.
.
i..
.
. (;'
\S/I")-1
'eric, ·
0.[.
oO.(f~ .
. O{:1."'j
0.1:)1 ~
o C'I: 1
o.~
\
\
,
,
'~..r:r:
. 10.. ~
.,.. J~][
. nil.
, ....c '
"O.lI .
_;r J( .
..'04. "'L.
.
5 66 1 21070 0
GHOUGASSIAN AIIBASSADOR JOSEPH;
ZENA
-
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
-
---"-~~.._-
,.J
S66LI0800
RODRIGUEZ-LAiA E~RIQUE/!\ARGA~
TA ~ ..
n
CHULi VISTA CA 91910
5661211100 S601~11200
PEESAaTI LAKSHIIINIARAYANA/ANA hENliEY TIIIOTHY D/LUZ 5
SUYA .'-
___~_ "WluLA VISTA CA 919'10
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
'.
5661211500
DEL G A I;O J AI liE
!
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
--~------
--~_.__._._--
5661~20100
E/ESPINOZA SUSH AN,UL LABRADOR P/VICENTA C
CHOLA VI~Ti CA 91910
5 6612 ~O 40 0
ROSS FAIIILY ~iUST 05-29-91
.. lu
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
,-
5661220800
~EiS
Bor:ITA CA 91902
HC
5601220500
fEGALALO ~OiO A/ESTER R
CHULA "lJISTii CA 91910
5601220900
LEAL JORGE F/JULIA II
~ Ut-! vl!-L - U~ 1910
5661221200 5661 ~213JO
SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA ASSCCI iAEUENCA JULIO
ATION af SEVENTH-DAY ADVE~TIS~ .
. _ J CH U1 A VI ST. CA
RIVERSIDE CA 92S15
5661221600
HENDE.SON ADA F
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5661222000
.T OR~ES JO SE L/ROSA II
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
(It
(11\
5661222 40 0
IIYERS IIARGARET A TRUST 08-24-,
o
- .
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
I.
,"
5661222800
.UNDER~OOD OLIVER E/!\AIIELLE L
TRS
.. ...-
CHULA VIST}. CA 91910
5 66 1 2 23 20 0
BOYES ALEERT C/ELISABETli L
-
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5661223600
1I00lE JO ANNE
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
C/ALICH I
9~910
S6 612217 00
hOH.... BAiiK E
-
CHULA ,~t~A'~~1910
~6 61 ~22100
iAhll BiiOlliLRS CO.STiUCTION CO
I!JC
~
5661~22500
ZAlIUDIO DOhNA C
~A
91910
56 61~22900
~HO!\FSON KILBEJiT L/!\ARJOIIE E
.- -
CEULA VISTA CI 91910
5661:23300
~TON LESTEI H/ELAI_E D
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
S6612237C0
TOSCirGREGCI ~'""
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
\
\
~
/
'.~o"."[-.-~'.
- '.. .. .. '.'"
~;o;c .:c
:,,0,';;,:
; :':0 .en:]
'. '0..... ~~
.. ..,.:c
,--"O:"'c
i5-/~)b
.. .-"".,. -_.~-,--- - -.--.-....... ------...;;.. _...._~ ---...
56610~0400
.~TAY P~TEj J JR/PE~R1 S
. .
CliU1A VISTA CA 91910
5<61030000
DUVALL~D E/~ORI L
-
CliULA VISTA CA ,1910
5661102300
~UDSO~ POLETTA S
SAN DIEGO CA 92137
TReST C4-11-90
,1910
5661103100
GUTIERR~Z RICARDO G/JcNhEY KAI
,p C
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
5661103500
OliLAU R DAL~./
CliU~A CA 9191C
56611(;"~00
~OR,.A
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
5<611(;4600
~AUAO~A
CliULA VISTA CA ,1910
5661105(;OC
VAL~NTI~ LOUIS/DEBBIE
CnULA VISTA CA ,1910
5 b611CJ5 40 0
AliNDT LESTER D/SOND~A ~
CORONADO CA ~2118
5661210100
HOR1 JA5Ei i(hOLLY K
- - ,-
CEULA VISTA CA 91910
5<61210500
~IA~
~1910
0>661030500
.ATRY - --- JE/PEA~L S
CA 91910
-.
'>661100200
~DA'R
CHULA VIsTA 'CA 91910
--
5661102400
hUDSOI! P
EGO CA 92137
o>6611028UO
~GAli COASTRUCTION
-
SAK DIEGc. CA 92119
CORP HC
-. ~ry
c.. (..cl
o. . '.,:;(;
o (r,--I
o.{!(: -
" 0 (~(I 5<61102700 ---
o. t( rARILAO FAMiLY
, 0(:' 1 ChULA VISTA CA
CO.. b'~
5661103200
CHAVEZ RbULIi/OLGA M
J L
CHULA VI~TA CA 91911
'>6611036UO
i~S~ILLO RO~"LO S/CATHERINE B
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
o>6bll043uO
~ICIA R
~910
o>66110~7UO
GOO~AR ~GHINDEli S/SHUKLA
CHULA VISTA CA 9i910
,,6<1105100
.ALTON !II
tHUU Vf;,TA
-
CA 9i910
5661105500
bRYANT Di;NNIS
CHULA VI~A CAr~910
5661<10200
~ASMUSSEN PERRY A D/UANICE R
~A VI~TA !A 9f910
56bl210600
1F~UGASSIAN JOSEPH/ZENA
CHULi. VbTA CA 919.1<t
~_J
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'.
'.
.
'.
,.
..
.
.
'.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.,,;~
~'.rK;
0...
0(....1
0.'<"
O(~C
0.:1.
o COil :
O&~~
,
\
\
~
,
r~~~
_1: )( ,
.J:1I. .-
, .r.'
'C;e. 11
_cx::
.0""l.1I
\S/:l::\
-- .~---:..-._~"-
..
~. ~,~,----~.~~-~-""",..,.<.~,_._..:.
J
.
56610~0200
HITCHCOCK FA~ILY TRUST
1
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
566103 C3 00
03-15-, .ILD EiiICB4riYLLIS A
~LA VISTA CA 91910
II
) 5661030600
~J
ChULA VIST rl
S
, t
~
5 66 11 00 40 0
Bll.ADrWY CHAliLES E/LETICIA
CBULA VISTA CA 91910
~
(lit
56611C2500
~ONNI J
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
\Q
5661102900
J A~SHIDIAN ~ASHAALLAH/~AR Y
CARLSEAD CA 92009
5661103300
tHLAU R DALE
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
5661103700
l'l AG I L L EE TT Y S
~!NG V"LEY CA
r
91 97 7
566110" 40 0
GUEnEA JOSE
-
ChULA VISTA
JR /P ER SE VE RA ~D A
CA 91910
\.
.
56611 04800
AiiREDCNDO RAFAEL/~ARIA R
- - - .-
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
p
,.
5 6611C5 20 0
COV ARliUEI AS JORGE/L YN N
ChULA VISTA CA 91910
5661105600
Sh~PAED RCY ~/JUDY L
~ ..~ -- -- -~ ~ ,
CHULA VISTA A 1910
5661210300
~O:TEZUl'lI-EEIDEi EDGAEDO/IISA
~A VISTA CA 91910
5661030700
SChICKER AUDkEY I
~. r
HULA VISTA CA 91910
:'661100500
SCOTT iObEiiT D/ChAHEEh A
CHULA VISTiI CA 91910
5661102600
EOEI~SON CDARLES L/DOLORES T
- ,-. -
CHuLA V~il ~A ~~10
J
1
Ah/~,ARY
CARLSE
0661103400
'Bii.ROTl l\AjD> L
t ~_L ..n
CEuLA VISTri CA 91910
5661104100
tEE Ii] kI FI CACION __
CB ULA VIST" CA ~910
5661104500
hO.ARD ill1lIAK J Jii/LINDA L
CHULA VISTA CA 9:..910
5661104900
CHUA NELSO. A/CH1RYL A
~Ii
CBULa VISTa CA 9:..910
~6 t 110 5300
HUH!,A. DAlE E
~-~ 'e
CHULh -, ~" A ~910
566121041)0
PEES1PilTI ~HASKAi/FHAII
r -~
CHuLA VISTA CA .I. 10
"
J/---
.!--" -
"",.
c.cd
o. , :;c
,,0(; '-.)
o. (i~
r (0 (: C
I ( O. t'
,OC C]
CO&6~
."/;_
\
/
5660902,,3<:
~pEUCR H TR
CHULA VISIA CA 91910
5660%240<:
~
CBULA VISTA C~ 91910
5660902406
BURGESS JI~ G/PALRICIA
CliULA VISTA CA 9191C
ANN
5661010 ~OO
HAR~Y F~ TRUST 12-C3-90
CEULA VISIA CA 91910
5061010000
GCN~ALEZ PA1yUAL ALICiL E
CEULA VISTA CA ~1910
5,,6~020200
EA!E~AN. t~IAM/JD3E?EINE C
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5661020000
~
~O
5661021000
~~~NCE J
~ CA ,,1910
~..'
.'-..'r-~, , '
, 70':;('
,OJ: X 5661021500
(, .pi' ~ .. WE.ARY rilhi' E.LLE~, T~;;
'!Oo..~rr.J SAN DIEGO CA 9210b
lOf" J(J
',..,0 .. 'Clt
;: 1
if::c.:-
56610<:1900
.YGAAAD VICTOR/SYLVIA
CEULA VISTA CA 91910
5661022300
H/; ns A ~A D
-
POCONU ~A.OA PA 10349
J
~6609023j3
LE BLANC EUTIMIA F
,.
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.,
~6609024U3
iHUNEY DONALD
...~
CHULA VISTA CA ~.10
.
.,
~6610101uO
GRUTZ~ACbER ROBERT W/BETIY L
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
.
.
~661Ul05uO
bYJ;.Ot: RUBY E
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
~661010900
K APP l'~ER fLORA
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
~6610203 00
GUIIERREL RUBE. <Ff>
CHULA VISTA CA 9~910
.
.
~6010207uO
.ICHOLSO. JOAN D TR
. ru
CHeLA VI~T CA 91910
.
.
~6610212uO
~CliROEDE~ ROSALIbD Z
.~~~
CHULA VIS.A A 91910
.
.
~6bl0216uO
CUMMINS JOSEFY- TE
L,T
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
.
.
:'6010220...0
FUENIES RODOLFO C
. --
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
.
.
~661022400
STANZIONE PAUL J
'. .
CHULA VISTA CA 9~910
.
.
:>6010301uO
~HEHESH VI.CENT lifE LOIS
~ "-
~ CA 91910
.
:-'.cX",
a.I.
.O(;a'
O.~.
'0(:'.:1'
O.<<}I
o (-:1( :
O&~
\
\
,.
,
~... -rx:
70.. .
,.'lX.
<~l/
'OaIJ( J
.le,{ J( .
.0'''''(.11
" .J ,-.
. ---. - ,. "~I'. _-<,
'\--_.' ...-"
,.---.....-...............-.....
.
5660~02 330
WILSOL ~ KEITH TR
C HU LA V IS T l"fI!'l' 91 91 0
.
.
5660902334
ROTHS CRILL ERUCE 10
~HSCHLLL TR
~91910
(I
.
5660902404
~~
CIiULA VISn CA .1.10
.
5661010200
(It ~R/IINDA l\
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
~
8-'.~"
_~__J
,0660902331
~RCSS ISABELLE
~ VISTA CA
R
91910
--~_.~~_.-
~_.-._._----'
5660902401
BELSH TERi>.UCE
" ...~
A 91910
5660902405
~
~910
5661010300
IO~TELO~GO ALEL/'IIE1~
~1
~10
1991 f.
5661010600 5661010700
ROBLES GILBERT A/IREVI~C YOLH. GIACALCNE LRIGIDA T TRUST c4-1
DA 0 5-90
, c CH1Llt VISTA CA 9I9ttO
LA JOIU CA 92092
, )
5661011000
YAGEL GEORGE C SR/CAROIYN A
~CA 91910
5661020400
TOLE:N H AR RY
ISTA
5661020800
~
CIiULA VISTA CA 91910
'.
.
56610 21300
SCHiCEDER ROSALIND Z
.CIiULA VISTA bA 91910
\!)
iO
5661021700
OPEZ GON"Al A/JUDY C
CE VISTA CA 91910
5661022100
KUSAKA TO~ T BETTY
LA VISTA CA 91910
5661022600
SCHROEDER ROSALIND Z
~A 91910
S661020100
~J.
CH ULA VIST A CA 91910
5661020500
ORcinR B
'ULA VIST. CA 91910
5661020900
~VIOIA F
CH1L. VISTb CA 91910
--'---,-c-,--"----
5601021400
CU~T"S EOWltRv L/TIEN C
SAK utEGO CA 92~
--------~_..._-.,..,..~,.......,.--.....",...,._._-,--.._-
~.._-,------~.... ----...-
5601021800
oALL FRA.CES K EST OF
SAN DIEGG CA~9
5601022200
~?AIRICIA A
CHULA VIST' CA 91910
5661022700
~HO~~S J/PAULINE R
CHULA VISTA CA 9...910
f
C . C.-I:
0.01
~~ 0 (;1:.
O.c),
r ( 0(:1:
Ico.CII
'..oel
CO&<!:l)C
\
\
l'
.';6"~~~
~O,"(.~
..,~Oi.t !t
..:o.e: ]
. "O:t ~
...rIl
'- ;0.. '(...
J -( V
-'--........-~"._"...._-
__"._._ I
I
5660900100
S CH N E ID EE ../jON D/C CF: ALEA
CHULA VIS~A CA 91910
"'
A TRS
~-
5660900900
~JA~E P
~91910
\..
~
566 0901600
SPANGLER PAULINE f
~A 91910
5660902000
~lIN
~A 91910
5660902302
I! EN KE D A1'1Wit D
C HUU. VISH. CA ,1910
5660902306
~/EARBARA J
CHULA VIS~A CA ,191L
5660902310
~YRES GERALD L'EARBARI. J
+AN ~GO CA 9 ~
(
(.
5660902314
~
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
(
(
56609 C2 318
~E
~2
B TIi
5660902322
WNE SANDRA oJ
CHULA VISTA ~!
91910
56609 C2 32 6
~ RICHARD W
11 ~ r
rHITT.! VT~,'n. A 91910
5660~002GO
~I.E
~CA
N Ti<.
91910
5660900600
PAINE AIlLOA E.LlilE TRUS~
90
~~910
03 -2 8-
t
I
~
5660901000
~SUSAN E
~9~910
5660901700
~l/EECKY
~ 91910
5660902100
~
~
56 6C 90 ~303
IWl\N~T~O"\KE~NETh/~HIRLEY
CHULA VI~. A 91910
5660,,02307
~ 91910
5660902311
ABbLI~l i<.OLE.~l
C'HULA ~A CA
C/LUClLLE Ii
91910
5660902315
~!ITli ~HARCN KAT~LLE~
~1910
5660902319
-'i~~[:E~~L~UA~ S
CIiU . 1910
5660~OL323
he GlJ~.L'HUEBE H
CHULA VISTA OA 91910
5660902327
iEIERSCN JUDItH ~
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
- ,- " ""-'" - _.~,~.~ ----.....-,
566 0900 ~OO
~ANCES S
ChUlA VISTA CA 91910
5660900700
EENiICKS ROBERT O/RUTh A
~10
- 5660901100
c.cd~
0.' a~A 91910
,"; 0 (le1
0.(.
,'0(:0
r 0.' t 5660901000
':O(:c\~
[,O&e...k~91910
566 u902LOO
~LA
~
5660902~0"
BLS~ lR~NE L
~A
91910
\
566(;902 ~Oo
~L/BER'ALINE P
ChUlA VTSTA CA 91910
"
5660902312
r ~EE
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
,'c:.'r~
_~i~x; lliK~IJl.~;~ :1'''''' ,
"o;c,i!l Ch " l'A 91910
-~~l 'L'-
:...o..~c~-- --,---
, 5660902320
~DOiOTeY M TRS
~91910
-_.---...._-_.,--,~-"'--_._--- --~,-----~ ---..-
566 0902 ~2"
~ SR/LO~RAINE
CHULA VISTA CN 91910
\S /1 LO:S
5660%2320
~D/FIELA E
~ 91910
-..,--..--.. .-.- '~. --_.._-_......--,.~.~ - ~,-~,-- _. - -,---, .- ~.
~660 ,00" uo
~ICIA
EL CAJON CA 92020
A HS
~660900800
~MARY C
~1910
-
~660901"CO
KOORE ZEL~A <AKA MOOIE ZELMA] C
>
~A 91910
~6609019uO
~T G/MADDY
~ 91910
~660902301
~ARY L
~1910
~6609023J5
~BAiBARd J
~ 91910
~6609023U9
~LTI
~91910
5660902313
GENTlY GLEN DEVELOPMENT
~OX
~CA 91912
:0660,023.1.7
~6-91
~91910
5660;023d
~
~2163
5660;023.;5
~
~ 91910
~6b09023~9
~ L/JOANNE C
~919~
t
(
!
( \
~
( \
0
(;
0
0
0
C
'-"
C
(
'-,
l
G
(',
~'
(
~,_ ___ _~_ ___..~...___,___~_~-......._,,,,,__~-~~____"""oY.....-....
-,,-_.. _. }
5660601300
~LLIA~ J TR
~ Ca 91910
5660710500
.~- ONA ji
~04
..
., 506C710900
,~ . C. ci mTl. DH~ ~~g~OL S
0.' .t~1910
. Ot; CJ ~
OO.(~C~ 5660711300 -
c. ~ i:. .RE5 ~ E;NaI~~AR10D~. !l
.0 t. (1 C"ULA VISTA Cn"191L
o & c.:.1t.
5660720200
~TR
~910
5660720600
~SA1i:l
~1910
\
\
5660800100
~OA~ TR
CEULA VISTA CA ,,1910
/
5060800500
cAXTC~ f,Alty F
~1910
.
:7b.I~ '--c ..... n'.'
O'~ )" 5e6 C8uO 900
iiJ';4'- . . E .11 LIAM J
: ~;D<. l-M~~A -VISTA CA 91911
'01 a-
lOCI)
~.,O&'Llt
5t>6080UOO
iiO:':;N l"If.RCI.t>
CEOLA VISTA CA
91910
56608u1700
~ST 04-02-90
CHU~A VISTA CA 91910
\..-- ,.
I~-' l~,
5060802400
~A.N!l
~1910
5600001400
1AVEii.ICK JONATEAN <LE.> LAVE-EIC . I
~ 91910 .1
5660710bUO
SHTd DEAN K/~OL S
~LA V~ CA 91910
56007110 cO
GRANADOS C FLR~A~DO G
~91910
~660711400
~ILLIA~S ROIALD R/CAROLE L
~1910
5660720300
...ANZA R..UL/JANET L
CEULA VISTA CA ~1910
5660n07uO
~ C/RUTH A
~ 91910
o6600002vO
oUCH AN AN' ~ A/ELI N S
CEU A VI~T~ CA 91910
5600000600
OEI~RUS~;LL ~/CLARA
.AT . CI CA 91950
5660801000
OSOR~O FRA~CISCO
~1910
5660001400
uWEN CLIATON W/CAROL E
~1910
5660601800
~URNS EUGH L/LURRAINE J
CHULA VI~~ CA f1910
56606025uO
DOLLARD GERALD A/NANCY D
~A CA 9191'0
it
.,
>>
..
..
.it
.
.
'II
".
;11
iii
(,
,.
~
lit
'.
'II
'.
.
.
.
-
<
"
".J -./\,
\ c-,/ I''i.' !
.
5660601100
APPNER RALPH H
CHULA VIS!A 91910
.
.
5660601500
LA'ERICK !'.ARK JjEsTELLA !'. TRS
~ CA 91910
.
T' 5660710700
cecc . CAR!'.AE~B~
O.C. SAN DI GO CA 115
,-O(;~
O.C .
c 0 (:
0.'. . 5660711100
(> O(:C ~EZ
C 0& 6'1 CHULA VISH CA 91910
I.
. 5660711500
~PHYLLIS J
CHULA VIS!A CA 1910
.
. 5660720400
~ D/RUTH M
C HU LA V IS T A CA 91 91 0
\ .
\
\ . 5660720800
~SHIRLEY C
CH ISH CA 91910
.
. 5660800300
!' ~AIL E
CHULA VISH 910
~'er~ I.
_ :0. a:
_]:':0;1;_., 5 6608 0070 0
- "O~'K ~ ~910
'0 C- '
~ '",'" ...
:_~O~:t
.r.. .
'--:.0 ""(,'1 .._---~._._._-
I. 5660801100
~YL
CHULA VISTA CA 910
,.
,. 5660801500
~
CHUL VI. 910
.
,
5660801 900
~~A~CY
~910
-."'-'....--"..- .~,...'-_..--,-, ...~.."."""""- _.. ,.....,.. '-
I.
- J
5660601200
~ALD D/!'.IEIA~ N
~ CA 91910
5660710380
~~~ ~ :~J:n A
H L ~ ~910
-'-.-~-~----- --,-
',..." ~-~-~~-_..-
566071C800
SOKIl ~M:ECMUSAN B
CHULA , 1910
1
I
I
-" .._-----~-
-- ..-. -'---~.. --'-~--
5660711200
.HITEHEAD J CHRISTINE
CHULt ~~ d 4'1910
5660720100
~4/~LOR1A !'.
~1910
566072 05 00
~EI',
~910
5660720900
~ iA~idr TkUST 04-23-85
(KuLA 'I5Tk CA 91910
5660000400
~"AIL E
LttU~A~LA 91910
5660b00800
GAiNER ~ENDELLE A <AhA RIVERO;
0660b01200
~ R/JuSEPliINE
~1910
,660b01600
~L
~H 44121
56 60dO 2300
~/CLAIkE
~91910
';6-,:;9
'::0:("1. ~1~il~~t~OG<.RALD Ln.AAUE TRS
, iP," 'lSJ.
. ~~('i~ CHU~A VISTA CA ~1910
.<"IJ
_'O"'c.X 5034513100
.~
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
....
.
.-- . C:.c)I
0.' :e,
'. 0 (:C,JI
o. (C
0(: c:1
(0.'(:
.0(:(1i
(. 0 & ~~
\
\
T
c '-/
\ _, ./l,
--' ',-,,,
5t3j220~Ou
~~.
CIiULA VISTA CA 91910
--..--
5 b3 33 02 500
~9"'103
PR IS l:.S HC
Ii 9191 0
5633304~00
. LIE .aN.s
SAIJ D.E
92103
5633305000
~ T/l!ARGAli.ET J
CIiULA VIS1A CIi 9191c
5634511200
DOUBLE Ii PAkT.E4SHIP
If.PERIAL Ii~CH CA 919~3
563..511600
S~ELT~ATE~ BU~ KESS PHRK LTD
.- \ ~ P
LA Io.iLJ
563" 512 GO 0
S ~EE.TlLA TEh. DO oS
o RALPH P
LA EESA
P.6.RK LTD
5b6u600200
~il/JAN C
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5660600900
EECEERA EliNEST P V/GUADALUPE
l':
CHULA VISTA CIi 91910
J
56332210CO
~li
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
~6333031 CO
~RUTEAAN
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
.
.
-
5633303600
KA~PG~~;TEliPliISES
CHULA 3 91910
HC
.'
.
~6333047 00
~ASCOT RLALTY INC
~ONITA CIi ~02
.
.
~6333051UO
~OLD/FEA.CES
~A 91910
.
.
56345113uO
~SllIP
'I~P~BEACH CA 91933
.
.
5634j117CO
Sil:.ETiATLE BUSINESS PARK LID
~SON
LA-~~43
.
.
~634j12100
~WEETwhTER BUSINE.SS PARK LTD
C 0 RALPh PE
.
.
.
. "., 3-29-90
SAN DIEG
.
C
.
906 38
.
~6bOb003uO
~EDWINA E
~91910
.
.
~6b06010cO
~PA',ELA C
~191'b
.
.
"
,
\
\
/'
,''-',.'crl
.1O'~.
.-01" )
~~*
'.(IJ
;"10 "'l:.~
i~/ I (/ie,
I J ,~ I
)
5633501200
~iOSS GEOiGE A/iAYFAIi 1990 L~
~-90
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5 63 4 511 40 0
S.EET.ATEi EUSI~ESS PARK LTD
~RSON
~943
.
PARK LTD
.
PARK LTD
(t
--- -~.._.-.- - ._-~...~_._-_.-
_ _ . "___. __ "-'.'c,....______,_
.
5634512800
~W/REBECCA R
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5660105600
~.ALTEli !
~A CA 91910
5660600700
~ER S/CAROL A
~CA 91910
_ __-L__~,J
~6332208QO
~.
CHuLA VISTA CA 91910
5633302400
~TEliPRISES
CHuLA VISTA CA 91910
INC
5633304100
CALTRANS ~
fA~ DI~ 92103
SAN D
1
kGl
Hll,K LTD
L
"UK L1D
--------~..~~~.,------..,.-~-_.._--
_._.___.~"'--'..,.~_~_.,__~J..,.. ..:_..,
5634512500
~NA1ciAN P
CHuLA VISTA CA 91910
I
n~~~-~.__.,..,~_.__~___.__._,,---..~-.-
5634~12900
~1NERSHIP
~CH CA 91933
- - - --~-------_._-~_._-----~_. ,-,.------.-
5660600100
~NEEI1S
~ 91910
~6b0600800
~~ARGAliI1A P
~'91910
,
,
i ,-
'::)/
5633102:'47
F l,S T LIVHG
~A
TliUST 07-iO-90
CA 91910
5633102551
~ONG l!ICBAEi. T
~A VISTA CA 91!10
5633102555
P~R~Z ~AR(,Ai<I1A
CHUL~lSTA CA ,1910
c. r.cll
,O.~;'.(,;
~,O(.L.
o. (lC
:.0 (.: ell 5633102559
o. t.e. ORTi:.Gk PEDRO b/EHIA
OO~:J:~-Cf.ULA VISTA CA 91910
P S
5633102:'63
B LU(O DELF INO
ChULA VIS'll CA
G
91910
5633102567
E;.K COCK JOY
~'[Jq~
CA 9191(;
\
\
5d31G2~71
~DITH C
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
r
5033102575
CO~nS JIiflCIA i:.
~ULA VISTA Ck 91~10
''--.~.'r.. .
101:;'
':O.r. :c.
,':Oil.!:: .
.::O.l:':l[J AN
. "01:r-':
..r )I( J
,-..O".clC 563,,2i0400
~
SAN DIEGO CA 92i22
!lIS AU F
i20
563,,220100
~y HliLEN L
riULA VISTA CA 91910
~
l..
56332<0500
E!.OliN DAVID
- I
CHLA VISTA
G/JERILlN N
CA 91910
,.----...-...------------....""'-........-......--.-.. - -
~6331025~8
THO~AS DONALD IITAE SOOK
CRULl, VISTA CA ~10
56:;31025~2
jiVN C01STANCE li
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
----.-
~633J.025~6
~tiEL!\A
CHULA VISTA
T
CA 91910
~633102560
"UZOUIZ JiAY!\UNDO .!,(GLORIA 0
CHULA VISTA CA 9r.r10
5633102504
.HO~PSON LEONA E
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
5633102568
~UEJiETTli
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
J
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,,633102572
ERENT~OOL AR~S PiOPEhTY OiNER~ ..
ASSOCBT ION
C . .
LA MESA CA 919t.1 .
5633102576
~
~10
5633210100
~OGL OOljP"f/ANNli li
C LA VISTA CA 91910
5633210500
~
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
,,633220200
~
~91910
.
.
.
.
.
(.
I'
..
5633220600
VALASAKOS AN THY A TRUST 03-20. ..
(l __'
CHilLA VI~TA CA 91910
"1!1!!!
C . C."Ci
0-.(.
, OIl'I.l
00.( ft~
0.'''-
. 0 (:<<: 1
(. O&~
\
\
/'
,
'''''''.'c;r'
. TO'. Ji
~':O'.l
. .nil ~
. ::or: 1
"0 . ..
Ie:! .. J
-O"'l...1I:
\--- I-'l\
\"--:>--- I
.
5633102545
BUTTOl< P!ICHAELLiifVA
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
.
.
5 63 31 C 2549
~liEL
~91911
.
.
5633102553
~S STANLEY !/I'!ELANIE 0
CliULA VI~ CA ~~910
.
.-.
-------- --
.
5633102557
~IZABETF. A
~191C
..
>>
5633102561
~
C liU LA V IS TA C A 91 n 0
>>
)
5633102565
iILLlb!"S RICHA..R..W.
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
)
.~
5633102569
~
~10
>>
}
5633102573
W HGRI EICHARL L
~EALTY
~CA 91911
e
o
5633102577
~Rl'1AG
EiA BEACH HI 96707
I.
,-
5633210200
pTR~}'uDIO AjJAl'IIE
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5633210600
~ERISTINA l'I
~ 91910
5633220300
~
~91910
._.J..
J
I
5633102546
~O
5633102550
~ELIN
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
5633102554
LE VAC~ J
. ~LA VISTA CA 91"10
5633102558
~GLOAIA 0
~10
?~33102562
"S
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5633102506
~I~A~O.TES CARLOS
~A. LIEGO LA a"43
A
,
~6 ,:)3l025 70
'BIZ t1i(ICI~
eR ULA S ~ C ~ 10
56:'3102574
ROJAS ~ANUEL C !'lARIHA
A CA "10
5633102600
~R !'l/SA4A F
SA. LIEGO DA 9,,120
563321031;0
hOORLHEAL SUE A
lRULA vM~ H 91910
5633210700
~A"I
~92103
5633,,20400
~nKOF~R_lI:~: TRUST I1H-
"
\ c-:>/
563~lU1 ~OCJ
ShO..T N ~Wr~
CnULA VISTA CA 91910
563~lCJ250~
~GPAtrCC
CETI1A VIS~A C1 91910
71 563 :>102 ~07
'. R LOUIS .P/SUSAN
~.C .-
'0. ,':',C SAN GO CA 92139
olf~1
O. ('C
( 0 (: ( J 5b3~102511
O. Co C TiiOIlA.5 PATRICK D
, 0(:'.------
LO&e.,,~~~1910
5633102~15
~ P TRUSl 08-30-69
CliULA VISTA CA 91910
5633102:'19
~SO. HrILIP R
CHULA VISTA CH 9~10
\
\
5633102523
~AZON
~lC
/
5633102027
~
~lC
'-'-'..'r-~.
..it> Irr.
:~o ;C;(
: ':O:it t;
..~,_....,.,.-]
~' ,,_~,'\...k.l..
'. ~O-1ll;; i
. _.r' :lC
'--.;0 ..e:
503:>lC2~31
~IKOS~ CAi<!\i:.N
ChULA VISTA CA 91!IT'0
563:>102:'3:'
Vi:.LhRDE SONYA
~lC
5633102039
li - All S
CLULA VISU CA
1'1'
\ ::+--
5 63 ~102 54 3
~A~ L/NINH K
IlPi:.EIAL iiEACri CA 91932
,--------.-..-..
5633102100
~AKOIi D
~910
:,63310l504 ,
~
0533 i025 uS
~
~910
~633i025i2
~
~10
0633102516
~
~910
~6331025~0
~TTE C
~10
'633102524
~LISON E
~10
063310252B
~D010liES C
~HULA VI~TA CA 9i910
06,3J.025~2
OVfDIA RuBERT
~ULA VISTA CA.10
:'633102536
~
CHULA VI~TA CA 91910
:'633:..025 ~O
~hGELA R
~10
06331025"4
~
~91~
~"---
.\
.
.
.
.-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
<.
.
~
'.
'.
i.
.
.
.
.
--
,
c . co ~
0.'_
,,0(.0
,Oo.(~~ -
o.c..
',0(:0 \~
O&c:.llit
\
I
-'
','. .
'''..r:r:;
,:UI::.tlt
:;:o~X)
, .:0141 _~~-
> :;:o{: 1
. '!CHI :i:
,;orXl
~;o &'(..It
\ S / '\3
__~,___..._ ., _. .___.J. ...
56.>3101100
l'iAKHNG MA~ I/VEiiD?.NA I
-
CBULA IIS'A DA 91910
H_ .J
,
5633101000
~.E
~910
.
.
5633102501
W~EZ cAVID Pi/ARGELIA I!
CHOLA V IS TA CA M. 91 0
.
5633102505
lEON F~UITA G TRS
CHOLA V CA 919lf!
5633102509
i:.QFII ~ K JOHN
EL C~920LO
.
.
5633102513
liseo GARY S
H1PERlAL kACh
CA 91932
.
.
5633102517
~
CHULA VISH C1 91910
.
.
5633102521
.OCA ANGHA
CEUIA VISTA C1
T
91910
.
.
56331C2525
Y AE BE CU GH GEOFF hY D IICTOliIA
(~
(~
5633102529
WALTEliS !'lARK E~Y A
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
(.
"
5633102533
EAYLO~ iIIHEli'lI~A P
~A VIS-A CA 91910
,
l
'.
)
5633102541
~T~~ ~~S~~ C/GRACE
.111.11: . . 3 '1
5633102502
CLIFTOI ANLR~W A/i'lARGO~RITA H
~
--- ~:,,-~-=--=.:;=;=".'._--"--
5633:.02506
VA N CU.A IE J GE ~---t.
CHULA RA CA 9:'910
,'-~"---'-'---'--~ ..--
.-" "'-_..--'-----_.~,-_.""'-'-_....._-_._.
5633102510
LEL dC-IEiiA JGSE A/AIO !'lUGA:
ITA . D C
~10
5633102514
KAiE~STEIN ROY F/JEAN C TRUS~
1-30-9j
CHULA IISTb CA 91910
5633102518
~RT
~62
lI/EELEN ..
5633102522
..O(;D~ I~ICHA
CHuLA J.~
5633102526
~10
5633102530
~O
5633~02534
5633102542
CH I1'l'Q)i iiAKR Y ,~/SHARCN 1
_ , 1l!II!l"..
CHLLA VIST" CA 91911
~
~l' cl
C.' (
0(. llJ
c. ( (
0(: "
C. C (
Q (': ~,.t
C .. ,~ '-
~
/
5t2::'9lJOt.00
VLT'~~'r.~t~/i.':.~".ii.I ~r
CiiG.LA VISTA CA :;1~!1.J
S63:':'Jl..r'!. 70C
Gi..NJ.::.~ hRL'_Al~Dl.r
(r..U1A V13'lA en
..:../hA~Ilir V
>:tlS,lG
St3.::.91.J210\..
~:~~~~~hF(Pe~~~~A C
:e3:i9u?.)C0
1.;';1(, 'lAL rr~~'Lr.,K()
'- r...... ....r. ....::J 1,_ ..:1.... 5;1 i...
C/e
:.t.3.,) :)i.C', CG
Ct::u......; VIS'IA
~' n.'
r- ",,0 Ch SoL...23
oc""OlLOG
C~ulA V~S~A T~ALT 8t-~
~:: ""~:)'~L
..;J~.+' J~ -... Cr. :;:.4....2,:;
r,' - P'T" -,- J
r ".... ~ .v:'
-
5c3.;;O::C'tCv
",'~ Cj7~"n - 'c
~.v"C" "","-
'..' ,. ," 9 au'"'
_ ,-,.' ... ~.. ...... ... ..' L
::,t.3.;jOiO:rOv
thT:2~TGK E1CLA~~ L/F~En~~E D
C~UiA ViStA Cb ~1~11.J
-
~ .r.c::!
ct. i
0" (l:l 503:;0"1"00
C t', ";i' ~FO~D h/"I.~~'jo L
O(,:('!.J~n ,,1)10
'0 t. I(
0'( II
o ",_!l. 5c3"OLloC"
~~E
~'r.
20HJ:Tb CA 9~9G2
h - 17~
St3,:;liJOjOG
EcICEohiT S,Y~CcR ~
~A~ SIEGO Cn ~2"01
St.3,:;1...0uGl.i
jf'-':.~ ..' f'iFn ;.
Cr.t.::...r.. VISL~ Cb.
~l~lv
::iej2::Civ9l.-'J
IIEIBEE:"-i/(j" ~ .1,,/(I.,[.,
CP.ULA VI~7A CA 91910
~632"O"5cO
~E~ GA~R:S~/~S~A ~ L
~10
~6j2>022uO
*2';"K.t.2 l,.J...FF.Ev
CHCL&\ V~:.._
~6j3vl\J2i..'O
r'i , . r I " < c [IF, 11 ~ '.R "g
,.. --.
CEUL; VI~TA CA 9l~1~
~633L106uO
Lrh.Lil VI..,'!:..
"
(j 'iLC i IL~ 1
~Aj. :I~~0 CA 9~1~3
:;Jo.:dul12"O
C~JLh VI~T~ l~n:~ ~S-9
tIC TLC ~lA~
.::.Ai. ~IEG0 CA 9.::.1:'3
::>6.")30205...."J
~L~~K ~Ai~: ~~CALOl h
"0,;:." l,. "no" -
:;J5~302J.00C\
_...Q)~ t'.A~2:;:E'l" i
u'l' V' -. ~ 0 9'0
L.. U 'n ... -' ~.tl. ...... ~.l.. ...
:16::'30214'...,0
1.'..; T.;l.S
~O
:Jt.J302.i.9\..'O
~C"-)?'-' .. .,."""!,, t,:/' ~L~ 1:',
~.llr.,.::.f'.J:l..P.l
~A~ ~IEGC CA 9~_2J
::>6.)3:"OC4-vJ
co A:-Lt':A N f-.l.TEICh
]'~i:ERIA'L LiLAC..-: Crl
jlS3~
~
.
.
.
C
.
.
.
.
PAF:TN.d .
.
~ART:;Ll
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1 :i:l .
::>633i.OC.19vO
~1~~~~~~~EA~~:':~F~r~
.- 'J""T r, liT '."'T' r.. O',;J', n
.
~
0(',(
c. ():(
ola
c . ( ,(
01:[
'I C., (
o (~(
I 0 & e...,(.
,
.(~'
c:t:J;,(
OC:f I
': t Ji( ;(
OCjJ!
ct!l1(
Q(:'{I
o &'L :{
\s---- \'--0
€&-
,563;'OC040C
Zna~EIi.~~]:.N BAERY L/TR::ASU;?';:: i ~
/~
Fl CAJOI. 0. 9202'1
.
.
563;'901iOO
~:;KDAf:
~lG
,
.
5632901900
LAS EiISAS DEL ~;Ali lTL
~IY Gii;OU?
SH DIEGO C/, 92101
.
.
5632902300
.,'ELKE" HFRED
c
"
l
5633010500
i.;TU..g!t~t:I..EJ:.T~ ;'T~
. it 1:': E ~1l, C ~ 1 ~
c
5030:090C
Cr,t'l11l. VIST~
c
(;
~
b
56330i0200
P O~! N E G !\'[ IL 1~ IP : T ~ y C
3t l{ S:;COI;I:' P. V'E
~SlS,l:'
5633020700
cmn, L iN Em, AF.~, C
FEANCE5 1:.
(_ h.!
, '
.I.\.;
,t
>\
56330.1100
PdC::H fAwny TEeST :1-lb-69
<LV ~_>
~A ~1~10
;.-
",633021500
~~.Li1INL !oj
CEUlA VISTA CA SlS1C
56331 C0100
SILVEi>. ~ICRAEl
~p,
C/JULI'IH T
S 191 G
56331C05['0
YUHNE:l ALEX EjE:':I1KGF..
~l'lG
~---g:j
j6~:2S,OC5JC
;;;;P.:~::iCrhL ';CE D/'Pi-.y....LlS 0
-
CHuL" n~T" LA ,:.9"0
~
I
:.6.:)2jO.J.5GCJ
o"'-~Tl.\tIilC 1
.
C:il;Lb \iI3Ti-.
rE 'iE'.lJ. !':./~..A hI 1Y...
~;, ~~y~C
5632:;,0;(.000
....A.;.i i:-s. ISAS TD
C C iIirCOL~E (,Rl.Ur
S!l.i,; ;:;'IE.GG (:'
)6 :'2~024uO
"A :. C> -'SiI U /"" n', b K "
~"T' '-T...., L-' ., 01'
1..." .....Ii oJ.....;;)l n t: ... ~ I..,.i
j633C1CJ6UO
CHI.;1h 'iI;:)!;;' 'ip.deer "c}-q P;'.F.':i:~~)
~c FI:\l.l'c;.~~
.:. ... .l. L.."'''': ....A 9.4-.1. L3
~6 ~3vli000
Lrt G1i.. IJI:':' 1'.
~
L/L. '.J..LC f I .'~J.
~ab .l.!L V L_ ~.4-~~3
::.S j3C2li3uC
t.5c...~..LAl,T.:. AJt.u1
Lnuto Vl~T;' CA
LiF.':'':6. ....
9.1.910
~633L.2l;b(;O
~Ch;'.~F. I)f.i'i iE...../.:if..li.or..Ei...
--......... Q '. c, ' C
~~...;1",
)0,30212 uO
1i0r:,Z~'I.:;) hOG~r. ~/~Avlh '1
~9i:;.LC
::>6.:3L2J.7LO
~:~:n ~~h~~" 9~91C
j6 3310 U2 ,,0
"'s TJlAl..O SlI~EO~O;;;A E
c..f......1i ~..;;!..l. 11 I...A So is, 10
::6jj:Ou6liJ
fill:.I~;:':' Al.E1..........r./E1L_~i~Ob:. L
~F.D~i, '!Y" n ~A ~l910
~
~ ,,( - -(
( c., (
o (~..
c. ( (
0(;' 'C
i ( c. c (
at:' 'C
c c & .::- '-
~
/
~ ar-.r
c t:
0<:..
(: t.
() C'-
c; t,
Or',
C"_,-
5/0 ~L:2COU
~E,';AG
CEU~A VIS1A Ch 91910
:>Z~3J.2~~~O_
c - l~-,'>:n ""'p - ",.,. :'. DIe' LIi 'U "v;
.... 4--'....+.... .........t"..' ...Juv;::;,+n.i.'~~
CEU~A VI~l~ CA 9l9~O
)
~
570~lL3~OO
10~lI~5CN LUE~N ~/D~~n L
M.LA ViSri'A Cl1 ~191c..
:'7031234,,0
ll~O\JIi<~LL IIle
.
L01~IT;'. c;, :.?190L
.
57031:d700
~,'~Ll..S OLEiT V
ChU~A VIS~A Cri ,1~lC
:,7031238,,0
!.r-p--"T "IC--"T ,.
'~ L.1.r",'-.i.l.J,... 11.'i.1;..o.J:',/PbU1FTTE E
CH~LA VI~TA CA 9~910
.
.
570 ~lL4100
ELrLSi.A':l\; JuA...CIK/r'EP;.A Y
..-J,... v-~-' , - ~lC1"
C":"'[....1'1 ~.......J.l'J, ~r. ;J u
",703124200
CAZAEI~ ~ULCE ~ b
CELLA VI~TA CA 9i910
.
~
5 70 ~124 :>00
fLJICh ~AhI0/~I~IA
CtC~\ VlS~A en ~1S10
OJ70 31246 LO
~?JRGSON :AY1S P/DAiLE1E J
C~CLA VI~T~ CA 9~~O
~
~
.s"i'O.;l.:.4;;lOL
:'LRCALO J~A~ cl~KCA
~
C.i..r~~ V~SlA CA ~1~ ~
)
,- G. :: ::: ~ - ~ ..-: ;; ~ 2 ,-. .J -i ") J J J } - ') . Ct
..~..-. '_' l.j)) aC)Cl
~.C~~', :-:: ~,,:.l :l) ) )ll .e
: . ... ,~- ,- :: :) I~ ~ ~ -}:) ) ) ) )) .t C> Cl
; :-~. (~: ' . - ". :: :: :; :) :: , :) ') :) : l -l -) , . e
: . .. :' : - " . ,.:- ") -) ::) :l ,....) )) )) _) :t C) .
~ . ( . . -: ", ": -) ") - ) )) . e
~_~_~~~__~~J~~~~J~~~~~~O
\ C/ il.!o
~
~ (J ( , C ,I ·
(c.,x
0(; (I .
c. ((
o (~( I
IIC.(( .
0<:' ( I
C & ,~(.
-~ .
/
(
570312260C
lLIF~f-TIN . H/FAThIlln A
C ED L A V I S 1A C. 91 91 0
c
c
5703123000
~_G/J-o?'.-"'D
~.:'\.Ul....
CEDLA VIS'U C;' 91910
570':;1;:3500
FA'OIU JCS~ (C~XI F
C Ell LA V IS H. n (;
5703123900
~,.~- 'ICf""l ' n"'fT'l
" 11 ~ t. 11, ~ r< _. . ..:. r r., ~ .I. 1\
EUL. '_L A >1:,10
57:13124300
,'P I-A rICEAf-1 F ~ARILiK J 0
CEDiA VISIA C1 ~ , u
57L12470C
,'P""" q""-L E/"" E
~ F._. i.-V jt, 10_.. " .,' ~ .... b.:'1 '
-
CEUl.,p VIS'IF. C1:-. 91920
- . r- r ,- ,... - - - - .......... '--- -
~-i'- ..... .
C I,
Q( .
CI
(J ('" r
C" I
.J ,
c>> " ;,
o ~ 0_ '- '__< '-_ '..-I ~ '_'
~703.L2L.700
.l'~OGAtI TCSnIEInUJY0P':CJ
C3L":'b VISl'r.. '-A 9191C
570312':;100
;:;(i-;0 L.D i E:.J(,E.l'~E t.;
CELLA \iIST'i-:. CA 9.i9....0
5703l23:LO
19~~i1ji DONALi. i./v(;i::.I:.:. w
LEJ~n VI~:h CA S.L9lC
S703:..2,+OOG
AS':';U.~'TC; 'IE..c.RESii
1
CEC;:A .\I-I~':'i. LA 9....9:...C
:,703~244GO
k~LK~R_EI~lL G/~lVE2~ &A~Ci ~
-c' -' ,', '~u li'
l... u ........~ \I I..J.I. r.. I... -,.L -' .J. '-,
:J7G3':"=4~00
~J'- l' "~-'I I"I'A
..;;..lJ .1..L l-. >."In ..L:JL J.l ""_
-:-.. I' ..- ~. ,. , If "
\.or: u ,n v':'~..i. 11 ....1-. ":::' J.':1...v
..~. .:
-. C." ,
,'W .'.
" . -. ,.... . " ~, .' '~..' ~, "
__ _~_).._'. ;,1
~. .(~:" ';-'. ...-~ -~ -'" --" ----.. '~-, ... ~\
~, ) ,,," .' - - '~, .. ,J ,.., _, ~
.. ;' ~. '.-- ~': ~-~ -:; :-i :; , .::)
~.( '--~-'~~-;'''~
,_ I
:' :: :-,~: ;) :)
\c ' 1"',1
\ .J / ' : \
/
AGUILLARD
~
91910
HELEN STANLEY
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
SAN DIEGO, CA 92102
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
SAN DIEGO, CA 92154
ROBERT LLAMAS
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
SRINI RUBIO
LA MESA, CA 91945
ROSEMARY FLORES
91950
........A
NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950
RALPH ROSA ESTRADA
SPRING VALLEY, CA 91977
CHULA VISTA, CA
91910
CHULA VISTA, CA
91910
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
LAKESIDE, CA 92040
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
MR. ALANIZ
SAN YSIDRO, CA 92173
ELVIRA LLAMAS
NATIONAL CITY, CA 91905
ALBERT MONTELLANO
-- .
BONITA, CA 919
WAYNE & SUNNY CULP
LA M~SA, CA 91941
LISA HERNANDEZ
~AN DIEGO, CA ~13
TERRY SANTOS
SPRING VALLEY, CA 91977
MAX MANNING
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
GUSTAVO & LYNN ELIZONDO
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
JOHN BOYD
SAN DIEGO, CA 92105
LT A.L. GWF (CVPD)
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
........
CHULA VISTA, CA 91911
ALEXIS HURTADO &
~
CHILDREN
91911
PETER WATRY
~
91910
~TT
~92104
ELIZABETH APARICIO
~114
IS/ !id
/-024'-9:2- ~d..IH /JiJkddoj-kkd fr; ~
j-..
<: ROMIE CERVANTES
-
CHULA VISTA, ~91911
.
ALFREDO/SANDRA VILLEGAS
-- ---
SAN DIEGO, CA 92105
TOMAS RODRIGUEZ
~ 92101
PRISCILLA A. RODDY
91911
ROXANNA SALCIDO
~102
SAN DIEGO
\ r 1~1 C\
\. ::J
BONITA, CA
91902
NELLIE GUZMAN
!If ~:f'" 91911
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Itemh
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 6/2/92
Resolution 1~f1~mending the Council Policy on sewer service to
property not within the City boundary.
rti
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public WOrkt;9'
REVIEWED BY: City Manag#
v'
Council Policy 570-02 was created to allow County residents near existing City sewers who were
not contiguous to the City boundary and, thus not able to annex, to connect to City sewers. On
April 21, and May 19, 1992, the City Council reviewed that policy and directed that staff look
at an additional alternative and return with a report.
(4/5 Vote: Yes_NoX)
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution amending the Council Policy on Sewer Service
to property not within the City boundary.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
On May 21, 1992 the Council directed staff to review all long range costs associated with the
City providing sewer services and come back with a recommendation on the cost for a non-city
resident to buy into the sewer system. Staff was also instructed to review the proposed policy
in connection with the sewer disconnect agreement.
In connection with the long range costs to provide sewer service, the Clean Water Program is
looking at an expansion and possible upgrade that is expected to cost the Chula Vista resident
nearly $160 million. This will be paid through the sale of bonds, which in turn will be paid off
by new connection fees and ongoing sewer service charges. The sewer hookup fees are expected
to rise at an annual rate of approximately 12% and to reach $5,187 by the year 2000. Sewer
service rates are also expected to increase to reach between $27 and $30 per month by the year
2000. There will be no City General Fund support for future sewer service. Instead, the sewer
user, both current, through user fees, and future, through hookup fees and user fees, will pay
all of these costs. This will be true whether the individual sewer user is within the City's
boundary or not. Therefore, staff does not recommend that the property owner who cannot
connect pay a higher sewer fee. Further, under State guidelines for preparation of a revenue
plan, all properties receiving sewer service are to pay their fair, proportionate share. Since all
costs associated with providing sewer service are built into the rate structures, it does not appear
to be appropriate for the City to charge an additional sewer connection charge.
However, it is staff's opinion that there are undeterminable administrative and general overhead
costs associated with providing any City service that are paid out of the General operating
budget. Staff believes that a resident in the unincorporated area should not be able to pick and
choose only certain City services as they desire without paying for these undeterminable costs.
If a property annexes to the City, a portion of the property taxes will go to the City General
Fund to offset these undeterminable costs. A resident of the unincorporated area will not
//'-1
Page 2, Item / ~
Meeting Date 6/2/92
support these costs through their property taxes, and, therefore, should pay an additional fee to
the City to offset the lack of property tax revenue and State subventions coming to the City.
Further, as previously stated, the City has no duty to provide sewer service to properties outside
the City boundary and may charge for the right of those properties to acquire sewer service.
Under current estimates, the City receives approximately $60 per capita annually in State
subventions. If an assumption is made that the average single family residence is occupied by
2.5 residents, the City would receive annually $150 in State subventions per residence. On a
Citywide average, the City also receives approximately 17% of the 1 % property tax. On a home
with a value of $250,000, the City would receive $575 in tax revenue. That would increase to
$660 annually for a $300,000 home and $745 annually for a $350,000 home. If an assumption
is made that State subventions will remain at the same rate, but the property tax receipts would
increase at 2% per year, the City would receive a total general fund revenue over a ten year
period of $6,154 for the $250,000 home, $7,084 for the $300,000 home and $8,015 for the
$350,000 home. Assuming an average annual interest earnings rate of 7%, the present value
of those amounts are $4,586, $5,278 and $5,970 if paid today. Thus, it appears fair that the
property owner in the unincorporated area requesting a sewer connection should pay the City
an amount within that range.
Currently, the sewer connection fee is $2,220. The general fund revenue lost because a property
owner receiving City sewer service is not within the City boundary, represents between 2.1 and
2.7 times that fee. Staff recommends that, for properties that cannot annex, the property owner
pay for the right to acquire City services by paying an amount equal to twice the total sewer
capacity charge. Staff is making this recommendation in lieu of a higher fee, say three times
the sewer capacity charge for two reasons. First, the sewer capacity charge is expected to
increase at a much higher rate than the increase in property tax. Second, since the property
owner will be entering into an agreement to annex, we do not want to make the fee so high as
to discourage the connection. As an alternative there is a basis to charge up to three times the
sewer capacity charge for the right to purchase City services.
In the area of the previously proposed "Annexation and Disconnection Agreement", this was
done in order to permit connection to sewer for those properties with a certified health hazard
since the full annexation process can take up to six months. Staff has reviewed alternatives to
this proposed agreement. The first alternative is to require the property to be annexed before
the connection be permitted. This alternative will take up to six months and, in the case of a
certified health hazard, could create undue hardships on not only the property owner requesting
connection, but on surrounding properties. Therefore, staff does not recommend this alternative.
The second alternative is to leave the ability of the City to order a disconnection from the sewer
in the event the annexation fails. While this would be a very difficult step for the Council to
order, the property owner would be aware of the possibility when they annex and, the threat of
that possibility would be an incentive to complete the annexation. Staff, however, does not
recommend this alternative.
A third alternative is to require a deposit equal to three or four times the sewer capacity charge
which will be used to purchase the right to acquire City services in the event the annexation
J j, .-.;.
Page 3, Item k
Meeting Date 6/2/92
should fail. Since this fee would be higher than for a property that could not annex, there is an
additional incentive for the property owner to see that the annexation is successfully completed.
If the annexation is successful, the deposit shall be refunded to the property owner without
interest. Staff recommends this alternative. Staff further recommends that the deposit be equal
to three times the sewer capacity charge for properties that are contiguous to the City boundary.
If Council adopts a fee for properties that are not contiguous and cannot annex of three times
the sewer service charge, staff would then recommend that the deposit and potential fee for
. properties that are contiguous and could annex be four times the sewer capacity fee as an
incentive to have the annexation completed.
Staff also included in the last proposal that the City advance the annexation fee from the sewer
fund as a loan to be repaid by the property owner as an additional incentive to annexation.
Comments made at the last Council meeting indicated that this may not be appropriate. Staff
still believes this could be an added incentive to encourage annexation and staff would support
it as an option for Council consideration. If the Council concurs that it is a desirable option,
the following language should be added:
1.
e.
The City may, upon request of the property owner, advance the cost of
annexation fees from the property owner, advance the cost ad annexation
fees from the sewer fund to help defray immediate expenses. The property
owner shall enter into an agreement with the City to repay those fees over
a period of time not to exceed two years. The repayment shall be added
to the property owners sewer billing and non-payment shall be cause for
disconnection from the sewer system in the same manner as nonpayment
for the regular sewer billings.
AMENDMENT TO SEWER POLICY
In summary, staff is recommending the following changes to Council Policy Number 570-02,
"Sewer Service to Property Not Within the City Boundary":
1. The current policy states that any property which seeks to connect to the City sewer
"must constitute or be a part of an area which could logically annex to the City or for
which a formal petition for annexation has been filed". It does not specifically require
properties to actually annex; it only requires the property owner to agree in writing not
to oppose current or future annexation. The proposed policy requires annexation to the
City before a sewer connection may be allowed unless certain exceptions are present.
Annexation under the proposed policy is defined as " the completion of annexation
proceedings whereby the territory is deemed to be within the City of Chula Vista."
However, the proposed policy also provides that if the property owner executes an
annexation agreement and deposits with the City an amount equal to three times the then
current sewer capacity charge to be used to acquire the right to use City services in the
event annexation fails, annexation is defined as "the filing of a formal petition for
annexation with the City and the filing of an annexation application with LAFCO. "
2. For properties where annexation is beyond the control of the connectee, sewer service
may be permitted on the condition that the proposed connectee enters into an
I/, ~3
Page 4, Item J1R...
Meeting Date 6/2/92
"Annexation Agreement" with the City. Under the current policy, the only agreement
the property owner must make is that they agree not to oppose any then-current or future
procedures to annex. The proposed agreement is much more comprehensive and gives
the City more assurance that the property can be annexed when it becomes feasible.
3. The "Annexation Agreement" shall provide that the owner shall diligently prosecute an
annexation application when the City determines annexation is feasible. The property
owner shall also pay to the City one-half of all applicable annexation fees which are in
effect at the time. The City shall hold those fees in trust to pay the costs of future
annexation proceedings. The deposit is equal to only one-half the annexation fee on the
basis that at least one other property will also have to annex and would pay the other part
of the fee. The City would refund any unused portion of these fees after annexation
occurs.
4. The "Agreement" also provides that, in addition to all applicable sewer capacity and
other sewer charges, the property owner shall pay for the right to acquire City services
by paying an amount equal to the twice the total sewer capacity charge. This amount
shall be paid to the City General fund. Currently this would be equal to $4,440. This
amount would change each time our sewer capacity charge is revised.
5. The "Agreement" further provides that no new construction and/or development shall be
permitted to connect to sanitary sewer without: 1) annexation to the City of Chula Vista;
or 2) authorization of the City to further develop the property without annexation. Under
this paragraph, the City would review each request to determine whether or not
annexation has become feasible since previous sewer connections were made by this same
property.
On April 7, 1992, the Council reviewed a request by The San Diego County Water Authority
for two hookups on the City's Proctor Valley Road sewer and approved Resolution 16564 which
approved "Special Sewer Connections For The San Diego County Water Authority For
Properties Located in Proctor Valley". These special sewer connections did not require either
annexation, or an annexation agreement, were very clearly not precedent setting and could not
be used by other property owners to justify future connections which do not meet our policy.
Mr. Michael Roark, one of the property owners, has complained about this and the previous
actions by Council. One of Mr. Roark's points of opposition was the zoning in respect to
keeping of animals. In working with the Planning Department, it has been determined that
current County zoning could remain until such time as the City undertakes a more
comprehensive study of conditions in the Bonita area. That study would include a review of
animal regulations and is similar to the approach proposed for the Bonita annexation effort in
1987-88. While this would presumably alleviate some of Mr. Roark's fears, Mr. Roark is some
distance away from the City boundary and the feasibility of an annexation is not likely in the
near future.
Staff also wishes to point out that Resolution 16564 permitting the connection for these
properties for existing development only is still valid, and Mr. Roark will not have to annex to
the City. However, if he wishes to further develop his property and needs another sewer
I~-i
Page 5, Item J ~
Meeting Date 6/2/92
hookup, he will fall under the provisions of this policy.
The current annexation fee charged by LAFCO is variable depending on the size of the
annexation. For properties of 1 acre or less, the fee is $2,000. The owner not able to annex
would have to deposit $1,000 with the City to be held in trust for future annexation. The
current sewer capacity charge is $2,220. The Sewer fund would receive that much for each new
connection, and the General Fund would receive twice that much for each property to be
connected to the sewer that could not annex. For a property with a certified health hazard that
is contiguous to the City boundary, a deposit in the amount of $6,660 would be required if the
property needs to be connected prior to the actual completion of annexation.
FISCAL IMPACT: In addition to the above revenues, the annexation of properties into the City
will have an incalculable fiscal impact on general fund revenues and subventions, although
generally the City receives about $60 per capita per year for each new resident from State
subventions and a variable amount of local property tax revenue. The connection of properties
to the sewer system will also increase sewer revenues and costs for treatment.
CLS(CLSISWRPOL5.A13)
LY-086-7
KY -054
1/"> II~-b
COUNCIL POLICY
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
SUBJECT: SEWER SERVICE
POLICY NUMBER: 570-02
ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION:
TO PROPERTY NOT WITHIN THE CITY BOUNDARY
EFFECTIVE DATE: 6-2-92 PAGE: 1 OF 4
NO. DATED: 6-2-92
BACKGROUND
The City has from time to time received requests to permit
connection to the Chula vista sanitary sewer system by properties
not within the City boundary. Each request has been handled on an
individual basis as to how to respond to these infrequent
applications. A policy statement is needed to guide staff in
providing legal and efficient service to the public.
PURPOSE
To establish a policy regarding connection to the Chula vista
sanitary sewer system by property not within the incorporated
limits of the City.
POLICY
The City Council hereby establishes the following policy and
procedures relative to connection to Chula vista sanitary sewers by
properties not within the incorporated limits of the City:
1. Basic Policv--Annexation Reauired. Except as provided below,
any property for which sanitary sewer service has been
requested must first annex to the City. "First annex", as the
term is used herein, shall mean "the completion of annexation
proceedings whereby the territory is deemed to be within the
City of Chula vista" except that if the proposed connectee
executes an Annexation Agreement in a form satisfactory to the
city, "first annex" shall mean the "filing of a formal
petition for annexation with the City and the filing of an
annexation application with LAFCO". Among such other matters
as the parties may agree upon, such Annexation Agreement shall
provide that the connectee deposit an amount with the City
equal to three times the then current sewer capacity charge to
be used to purchase the right to use City services in the
event annexation fails. The Agreement shall also provide that
the connectee agrees to diligently and in good faith prosecute
and support the annexation effort and further agrees that, if
the annexation should fail, the City may claim the specified
deposit as payment for the right to utilize City services, and
if the annexation is successful, shall refund the deposit
without interest.
a. Property for which sewer connection is sought must either
front upon a sanitary sewer in the City system, or front
upon the logical extension of such a sewer.
b. None of the cost of any sewer main extension required to
1~-7
COUNCIL POLICY
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
SUBJECT: SEWER SERVICE
POLICY NUMBER: 570-02
ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION:
TO PROPERTY NOT WITHIN THE CITY BOUNDARY
EFFECTIVE DATE: 6-2-92 PAGE: 2 OF 4
NO. DATED: 6-2-92
serve property beyond the City boundary shall be borne by
the city. Such sewer extensions shall be constructed in
conformity with City standards and shall be dedicated to
the City for public sewer purposes in a manner approved
by the City Engineer. When appropriate, such sewer
extensions may be subject to reimbursement agreements.
c. The owner of property seeking connection shall pay all
applicable non-capacity charges related to connecting to
the sewer as levied by the City. In addition, they shall
pay to the City of Chula vista the current sewer capacity
charge.
d. The owner of property seeking connection shall pay any
costs, fees or charges by any governmental agency other
than Chula vista which are relative to and/or
necessitated by the construction of sewer facilities to
serve the property seeking connection.
2. Properties Where Annexation is Bevond the Control of Proposed
Connectee. In situations where the property may not be
immediately annexed, either due to lack of proximity, or where
the property is in close proximity, but not contiguous to, the
City boundary and other owners will not consent to annex so as
to make annexation impossible, service may be permitted on the
condition that the proposed connectee shall enter into an
"Annexation and Disconnection Agreement" with the City in a
form acceptable to the city which provides for the following:
a. The owner of property seeking connection shall agree in
writing to file and diligently prosecute a formal
petition for annexation with the city, and file and
diligently prosecute an annexation application with LAFCO
when the City determines annexation is logical. Said
agreement shall be a covenant running with the land,
shall apply to all successors in interest and shall be
specifically enforceable. The agreement shall specify
that, in connection with any enforcement action taken by
the city, attorney's fees and court costs shall be a lien
on the land. The agreement may, to the extent permitted
by law, also provide that the property owner shall sign
an undated annexation petition and grant irrevocable
power of attorney to the City to date the petition and
prosecute the annexation petition.
/~ -8'"
COUNCIL POLICY
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
SUBJECT: SEWER SERVICE
POLICY NUMBER: 570-02
ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION:
TO PROPERTY NOT WITHIN THE CITY BOUNDARY
EFFECTIVE DATE: 6-2-92 PAGE: 3 OF 4
NO. DATED: 6-2-92
b. The owner of property seeking connection shall pay all
applicable non-capacity charges related to connecting to
the sewer as levied by the city. In addition, they shall
pay to the City of Chula vista the current sewer capacity
charge.
c. The property owner shall pay to the City an additional
amount to the City which is equal to twice the total
sewer capacity charge as itemized in paragraph b. above.
This amount shall be paid to the city General Fund and
shall be used to offset any administrative, overhead, or
other costs the City incurrs as a result of providing the
municipal service outside the city boundary.
d. The property owner shall pay to the City one-half the
amount of all applicable annexation fees, including City
and other agencies fees, which are then in effect. The
City shall hold these fees in trust to be used to offset
the fees required to be paid at the time of the future
annexation. The City will enter into a reimbursement
agreement to repay any portion of the fees deposited
based on other contributors when the property is annexed.
e. The agreement shall provide that the owner agrees not
oppose any then-current or future procedures to annex
their, or adjacent properties, to the city of Chula
vista. It shall also provide that the owner agrees not
to sign a written protest petition, or otherwise file a
formal written or formal oral protest of annexation at
the Conducting Authority level of annexation proceedings.
However, nothing herein shall affect the right of the
property owner to vote in any annexation election that
may be called.
f. The agreement shall provide that no new construction
and/or development shall be permitted to connect to
sanitary sewer without annexation to the City of Chula
vista or authorization of the City to further develop the
property without annexation has been given.
3. No sewer service shall be provided to any property beyond the
city boundary unless and until written approval of that
specific service has been received by the City Engineer from
the City of San Diego pursuant to terms of the Sewage Disposal
Agreement of 1960.
/t,-1
COUNCIL POLICY
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
SUBJECT: SEWER SERVICE
POLICY NUMBER: 570-02
ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION:
TO PROPERTY NOT WITHIN THE CITY BOUNDARY
EFFECTIVE DATE: 6-2-92 PAGE: 4 OF 4
NO. DATED: 6-2-92
4. Upon connection to the Chula vista sanitary sewer system the
property so served shall be subject to any appropriate ongoing
Chula vista sewer service and/or sewage pumping charge.
sewer5.pol
/(,-/(j
RESOLUTION NO.
I t..s't:jg"
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE COUNCIL POLICY ON
SEWER SERVICE TO PROPERTY NOT WITHIN THE CITY
BOUNDARY
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, Council POlicy 570-02 was created to allow
County residents near existing city sewers who were not contiguous
to the city boundary and, thus not able to annex, to connect to
City sewers; and
WHEREAS, Council Policy 570-02 states that any County
resident wishing sewer service from a City sewer main must enter
into an agreement with the City to not sign a written protest
petition, or otherwise file a written or oral protest of annexation
at the Conducting Authority level of annexation proceedings; and
WHEREAS, in a previous action, a resident of El Rancho
vista has requested annexation and sewer service was denied because
the area opposed annexation; and
WHEREAS, staff has received several requests for sewer
service from county residents and, in light of the policy and past
action, believes that the policy needs to be revised.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does amend Council Policy 570-02 on sewer
service to property not within the City boundary as set forth in
Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference
as if set forth in full.
Presented by
7L
Bruce M.
Attorney
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
C:\RS\Wraithl
/~,//
1\
\ J
LAWRRMOF
MICHAEL J. ROARK
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
231 FOURTH AVENUE
CHULA VISTA, CA. 92010
TELEPHONE
(619) 4264341
June 1, 1992
DONALD W. DETISCH
DETISCH, CHRISTENSEN & WOOD
444 West C Street, suite 200
San Diego, CA 92101
Re: SDCWA v. Jensen and SDCWA v. Roark-Edeen
Response to faxed letter of 5/28/92 re Temporary Right
of Entry for Sewer Laterals to each parcel
Dear Mr. Detisch,
In conversation with the Cliff Swanson, Director of Public
Works for City of Chula Vista, this date 6/1/92, he advises that
Chula vista still claims ownership and jurisdiction over the new
sewer installed in front of the Parcels being partially condemned
by SDCWA.
As a result, any connection to that line, as long as Chula
vista claims, or does in fact have any jurisdiction over the line
as it affects defendants parcels, defendant land owners CANNOT
agree to such connection.
One solution, to avoid financially disastrous land use
issues caused by Chula vista's policies of annexation and sewer
connections to the line they claim they own and have
jurisdiction, is to run an 8" sewer up Proctor Valley Road from
the undisputed County sewer just south of Jonel Way. This
solution has been known to staff at SDCWA at least since 1/23/92
when it was pointed out to the members of the Engineering and
Operations Committee Meeting of same date in a document from
staff entitled "COMMENTS BY MR ROARK AND MR JENSEN", at pg 2 next
to last paragraph.
1
/6'
/'(
. ->
Donald W. Detisch
June 1, 1992
Page Two
Therefore, defendant land owners regrettably must decline to
sign the proposed Temporary Right of Entry Agreement, for the
above, as well as other, shortcomings of the agreement.
R~spectfull' ~ ~
~,~~\ "
Michael J. Roark,~-counsel for
owners and businesses located
thereon of parcels affected
cc: Mike Spata
Vince Biondo
Gary R. stephany
Pat Clock
Cliff Swanson
Don and Georjean Jensen
Patricia S. Holland-Roark
Hilda Edeen
2
/ ~ III
/(?' .--
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 1, 1992
Councilman Jerry Rindone
John D. Goss, City ManagerJ4 l:>.6~11
Response to Questions regarding the June 2, 1992 Agenda
Following are staff's responses to your comments/questions regarding items on the above
referenced Council agenda.
ITEM 8 - Storm Drain Improvements
1. Why is the Engineer's estimate higher than all eleven bidders?
The engineer that prepares the estimate uses bid costs from similar projects as the
basis for the estimate. We have been adjusting the projects for the current economic
condition, however, these bids appear to be far lower than our recent experience would
indicate. We used as the basis for the estimate a project on which bids were opened
in July, 1991. There have been very few other projects of this type. In preparing the
estimate for this project the engineer would normally use about the midpoint of all bid
items on similar projects. We try to be conservative on our estimates so that we are
not short of funds when it comes to award of the project. The large number of bidders
on this project is very indicative of the competition due to the economy.
ITEM 15 - Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Facility - 3 North Second Avenue
JERRY: PLEASE NOTE THAT PLANNING STAFF IS STILL GATHERING INFORMATION TO RESPOND TO
YOUR QUESTIONS. A COMPLETE RESPONSE WILL BE DELIVERED TO YOUR OFFICE BEFORE THE
COUNCIL MEETING TOMORROW.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
Why did the RCC not reschedule a special meeting prior to June 22 to consider
this item? Would this not have been appropriate?
According to the report, on Page 15-3, "This proposal would centralize Victory
Outreach's services for San Diego County in the South Bay." How many clients
would directly be served from Chula Vista?
Residents are not permitted to have vehicles on site or to wander on the grounds
or from the grounds without authorization. How is this guaranteed and/or how is
this actually monitored?
How many staff members are present during the day and during the evening who are
not former residents of "Victory Outreach"? tNOTE: 00 not include the six
administrative staff on duty during business hours.)
The report indicated approximately 200 letters of support were received. Were
these letters of support quite similar or were they a form letter? Please
provide samples.
these letters of support quite similar or were they a form letter? Please
provide samples.
6. Please list all agencies and/or programs operating near (within 1/2 to 3/4 mile
radius) the proposed site which bring into this neighborhood special social
services. Include the number of persons housed and counted as adult welfare
recipients of services by these agencies and/or programs.
7. What CEQA protections are there if the Council determines there may be "serious
public controversy" over the environmental effects? Is this case law in this
are? Please explain.
ITEM 16 - Council Policy on Sewer Service
Please note there is a typographical error on Page 16-3 under Section 1 e. In the
second line of this paragraph, it states ".. .advance the cost od annexation" rather
than of annexation. This is just a comment.
\
REGARDING THE ITEM TABLED LAST WEEK CONCERNING THE LAIDLAW CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT,
WHEN WILL THIS ITEM BE BROUGHT BACK TO COUNCIL?
The agreement will be brought back to the City Council at the June 9, 1992 meeting.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA
ITEM 4 - AGREEMENT WITH WKA
1. Under Scope of Work, Item 8, please explain what this item means.
Item 8 reads "Analyzing the Mexican consumer base and its impacts on Chula Vista." The
RFP included a "Mexico Market" analysis as a third component of the overall study.
This component was included in the RFP based upon: (1) the lack of available Tijuana
region demographics; (2) the lack of data regarding Mexican National consumer habits
in the Chula Vista area (e.g., at shopping mall, hotels, etc.); and, (3) the lack of
projections regarding future Mexican spending. This information would be very useful
to incorporate into the overall chula Vista Market Analysis and to have to provide to
Chula Vista business prospects.
Due to budget constraints, it was recognized that a comprehensive Mexico Market
Ana lys i s mi ght not be feas ib le. However, the proposed contract with Will iams-
Kuebelbeck and Associates (WKA) does provide for a limited Mexico Market Analysis (see
Phase II of Attachment I to the staff report). WKA will contact local and regional
shopping centers to obtain information regarding Mexican National shopping patterns.
WKA will also obtain and provide reliable demographic data for the Tijuana area. (WKA
will not conduct original research). Finally, as part of Phase II, WKA will provide
the City a report summarizing anticipated impacts of the proposed North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) upon San Diego and to the extent possible as specifically
relates to Chula Vista.
JDG:mab
c~: Mayor and City Council