HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1992/05/05
Tuesday, May 5,1992
4:00 p.m.
;'1 declare under penalty of perjury that I am
em:'.i!o:eJ by t;~o City of Chula Vista in the
C:' <~.'.1 '>r -i:hc City Glerl{ end that I pnsted
'\: -is ~ '-:;':1'-~::'r'~i)~L~c ':-m tho Bli::atin Board at
th~ u::..l:?J;-,Y;'C03 BUifdifP., c.r:d at CitY<.Hall on
L)r..L:'~-y,.:?:~, SIGNE;)y~"""--"
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
Relnllar Meerins: of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CALL TO ORDER
Councilmembers Grasser Horton ~ Malcolm ~ Moore ~ Rindone ~ and
Mayor Nader _'
1.
ROLL CALL:
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3. APPROVAL OF MINlITES: April 28,1992
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY:
a. Proclamation congratulating the Delta Sigma Phi Fraternity for their Community Service -
In order to promote a positive image of young college men and encourage a better
understanding between elders of the community and young people, an intergenerarional
project was planned to assist the Senior Center with the move to the new Center. The
proclamation will be presented to Joel Pitel, Recreation Leader with the Senior Section of
the Parks and Recreation Department, on behalf of the Delta Sigma Fraternity.
b. Proclaiming Mayas "Older American's Month" - May is the month that the nation takes time
to acknowledge and celebrate the achievements and contributions of its older citizens. The
proclamation will be presented to Helen Stokes, representing the Commission on Aging.
c. Proclaiming the week of May 3-9, 1992 as "Youth Week" in the City of Chula Vista - The
proclamation will be presented to Bill Walthen, Exalted Ruler of the Chula Vista Elks Lodge,
and Garry Hummel, Youth Activity Chairman.
d. Oath of Office: Susan Dornblaser - Design Review Committee.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 15)
The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent CaIendIJr will be enm:ted by the
Council by one motion without discussion unkss a Counci1member, a member of the pubtk: or City staff requests
that the item be puIIed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to
Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form
to speak in favor of the staff recommendJ2tion; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff
recommendJ2tion.) Items puIIed from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Action Items and Boards and
Commission RecommendJ2tions. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business..
5. WRITTEN COMMUMCATIONS:
a. Claims against the City: Ms. Maria C. Becerra, c/o Donald A Hon, Attorney at Law, 2232
El Cajon Boulevard, San Diego, CA 92104-1194. It is the recommendation of the City's
claims adjustors, Carl Warren & Company, and concurred by Risk Management, that the
claim be denied.
Agenda
-2-
May 5,1992
6. ORDINANCE 2511 AMENDING TInE 15 OF TIlE CHULA VISTA MUNlOPAL CODE BY
ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 15.54 ESTABUSHING PROCEDURES FOR TIlE
ASSESSMENT AND COllECTION OF BRIDGE AND TIfOROUGHFARE FEES
(second readinl!: and adoption) - The proposed ordinance would enable the
City to establish a fee district pursuant to Section 66484 of the Map Act
and the charter powers of the City. Staff recommends Council place the
ordinance on second reading and adoption. (City Attorney and Director of
Public Works)
7. RESOLUTION 16584 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONfRACf FOR PURCHASE OF
mUCKS - Bids were received for the purchase of three vehicles approved
in the FY 1991/92 budget. Two vehicles are provided for in the Equipment
Replacement budget and the other one in the General Fund. The vehicles
will be used by Public Works Operations. Staff recommends approval of
the resolution. (Director of Finance) Continued from the 4/21/92
meeting.
8. RESOLUTION 16609 AMENDING;EXfENDING CONfRACf BETWEEN TIlE CI1Y OF CHULA
VISTA, BUD GRAY, AND EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR
EASTI.AKEIKAISER PROJECTS - The amendment to the existing agreement
will extend the term and adjust the compensation in order to complete the
EastLake/Kaiser projects. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Planning)
9. RESOLUTION 16610 AMENDING CONfRACf WITIf ROBERT BEIN, WILUAM PROST AND
ASSOOATES, INC. FOR DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES REQUIRED FOR
DRAINAGE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS NORTIf OF EAST NAPLES PROM
HILLTOP DRIVE TO 767 FEET EAST - On 9/19/89, Council approved an
agreement with Robert Bein, William Frost and Assoc. for design
engineering services required for the drainage channel improvements north
of East Naples Street from Hilltop Drive to 767 feet east. On 3/3/92, staff
presented a report recommending to proceed with an alternative design to
replace the existing unimproved channel with a concrete invert and
stabilized grass side slopes. The amendment defines the scope of
additional services required to complete design and provides for an
increase of $8,215. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director
of Public Works)
10. RESOLUTION 16611 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TIlE COUNIY OF SAN DffiGO,
SOUTIiWESTERN COMMUNl1Y COllEGE DISTRICf, AND TIlE 01Y OF
CHULA VISTA FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATING
TIlE SOUTIiWESTERN COllEGE lRANSIT CENTER - The agreement
authorizes the County to proceed with construction of the Southwestern
College Transit Center and defines maintenance responsibilities between
the College and the City after the Center is built. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
Agenda
-3-
May 5,1992
11. RESOLUTION 16608 APPROVING RESIDENT/NON-RESIDENT GREEN FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE - At the meeting of 3/19/91,
Council approved the current green fee schedule for the Chula Vista
Municipal Golf Course. Council directed staff and American Golf to
develop and present to Council a proposal for a resident discount rate
before any future increase is considered. At the 4/28/92 meeting Council
requested additional information on fmancial impact. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Parks and Recreation) Continued
from the 4/28/92 meeting.
12. RESOLUTION 16612 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT Willi MARIO TORERO FOR THE CHULA
VISTA MURAL PROGRAM - PHASE I - In November 1988, Council
requested staff investigate the possibility of developing a program which
would use murals to replace graffiti in certain areas of the City, due to an
increase in graffiti vandalism. Since that time funding has been received,
an artist selected, and staff is prepared to proceed with the anti-graffiti
mural program. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director
of Parks and Recreation)
13. REPORT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT rnREE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN
As part of the Department's long range planning efforts, a Three Year
Strategic Plan has been prepared to guide the Department's future and the
community's parks and recreation services. Staff recommends Council
accept the report. (Director of Parks and Recreation)
14. REPORT SANDAG REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY - The Regional
Growth Management Strategy (RGMS) has been developed through
SANDAG in response to Proposition C, the County Advisory Measure on
Growth Management which was approved by the voters in 1988. The
Council reviewed a draft of the RGMS on 10/1/91, and directed staff to
forward specific comments on the draft report. On 1/24/92, the SANDAG
Board recommended approval of the revised draft report, which includes
responses to all of the comments received from Chula Vista and other
reviewing agencies. Staff recommends Council approve the revised draft
RGMS. (Director of Planning)
15. REPORT COUNCIL ACTION UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON
FREESTANDING SIGN AT 830 BROADWAY PACIFIC SIGN
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - On 4/28/92, Council held a scheduled
public hearing to consider an appeal on a freestanding sign located at 830
Broadway. Council took action to uphold the Planning Commission's
decision and denied the appeal. It was determined that the owners of the
property, Le. the Firestone Company, received notification of the hearing;
however, Pacific Sign Construction, who was representing the appellant
failed to receive notice. Staff recommends Council rescind action on DRC-
92-04 and reschedule a public hearing for 6/2/92, at 4:00 p.m. to consider
the appeal. (Director of Planning)
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
Agenda
.4.
May 5,1992
PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
TIu< following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by low. If you wish to speJJk
to tl1I)I item, p1eDse fill out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City C1erlc prior
to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speJJk in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form
to speJJk in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five mi1wtes per individuaL
16.
PUBUC HEARING
17.
PUBUC HEARING
PCM-92-03: REQUEST TO AMEND TIiE EASTI.AKE II GENERAL
DEVELOPMENf PLAN, EASTI.AKE GREENS SPA PLAN AND EASTI.AKE I
(EXPANSION) PLANNED DISTRICT REGULATIONS . The request is to
amend the EastLake Greens SPA Plan and related ordinances to transfer
sixty.nine dwelling units within the project area. No increase in dwelling
units is proposed. Staff recommends Council certify Negative Declaration
IS.92.04, approve the resolutions and place the ordinance on first reading.
(Director of Planning) Staff requests this item be continued to the meetinst
ofMav 19.1992.
CONSIDERING REQUEST FOR VACATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER
PURPOSES AT 1144 BROADWAY. In accordance with subsection 8333 of
the California Streets and Highways Code, a public service easement may
be vacated by the Council after a public hearing is held to consider the
matter. The vacation request was filed by the Price Company, 1144
Broadway. Resolution of Intention No. 16587 was passed by Council on
4/21/92. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public
Works)
RESOLUTION 16613 GRANTING VACATION OF AN EASEMENf FOR SEWER PURPOSES AT
1144 BROADWAY (pRICE COMPANY)
18.
PUBUC HEARING
HOUSING AND COMMUNI'IY DEVELOPMENf NEEDS FOR TIiE 1992.93
COMMUNI'IY DEVELOPMENf BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM. The
City will receive $1,380,000 in CDGB entitlement funds and anticipates
receiving program income of about $181,000 from the CDBG Housing
Rehabilitation revolving fund. The public hearing provides an opportunity
for citizens to comment on how CDBG funds can be allocated to meet the
City's housing and community development needs. No staff
recommendations are being made at this time, and Council is not expected
to take any action on the proposed budget other than to give desired
direction. Staff will present funding recommendations for Council action
at the meeting of May 19th. Staff recommends Council hear public
testimony, accept the staff report, and direct staff to return on 5/19/92
with the funding recommendation report. (Director of Community
Development)
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opporl1J1li1y for the general public to address the City Council on tl1I)I subject matter within the Council's
jurisdk:tion tIult is not an item on this agenda. (State low, however, generally prohibits the City Council from
taking action on tl1I)I issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a
Agenda
-5-
May 5, 1992
subject, plellse complete the yellow "&quest to Speak Under Oral C011I11W1IiJ;ations Form" avaiJllb1e in the lobby
and submit it to the CiJ.y Clerk prior to the meeting. Tlwse who wish to speak, plellse give your ruune and address
fOl' record purposes and follow up m;timL Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker.
ACI10N ITEMS
The items lisU!d in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by the
CoundJ, stoff, 01' members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council and SlIljJ
recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the altunative. Tlwse who wish to speak, pleIlse fill out
a "&quest to Speak" form avaiJllb1e in the lobby and submit it to the CiJ.y Clerk prior to the meeting. Public
comments are limited to five minutes.
19.
REPORT
REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF FEES FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-
92-12 - On 3/3/92, Council considered a letter from Fernando Durazo
dated 1/21/92 requesting that fees in excess of the original $1,000 deposit
for processing a conditional use permit for a used car sales facility at 1506
Broadway be waived. Council referred the matter to staff for a report and
recommendation. Staff recommends Council accept the report and deny
the request. (Director of Planning)
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one
of the CiJ.y's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees.
None submitted.
ITEMS PULLED FROM TIiE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Ca1endor. Agenda
items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by CounciImemhers. Public
comments are limited to five minutes per individual
OTIiER BUSINESS
20. 01Y MANAGER'S REPORT(S)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
21. MAYOR'S REPORTlS)
22. COUNOL COMMENTS
Councilman Malcolm:
a. Possible action on Southbay Community Services proposal for transitional/low-income
housing.
Agenda
-6-
May 5,1992
ADJOURNMENf
The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss:
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Southland Paving vs. City of
Chula Vista
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on May 12,
1992 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
A joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting will be held immediately following the City Council
meeting.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item:
Meeting date:
~c......
5-5-92
SUBMITTED BY:
PROCLAMATION: Congratulating the Delta Sigma Phi Fraternity
for their Community Service
Director of Parks and RecreatiO~
ITEM TITLE:
San Diego State University's Delta Sigma Phi Fraternity values Community Service as an
important part of their overall program.
In order to promote a positive image of young college men, and encourage a better
understanding between elders of the community and young people, an intergenerational project
was planned to assist the Senior Center with the move to the new Center.
On February 19. 1992 eight young men: Jake Anderson, Matt Blair, Paul Caramat, Ryan
Clark, Sean KaJjala, Joel Pitel, Scott Samuelson and Winnie Tolentino worked many hours
with the Seniors in the moving of records and supplies to the new Center.
This intergenerational interaction helps to enhance the relationship between elders and young
college students. These young men and their Fraternity are to be commended for their
unselfish donation of their time to help others in the Community.
Joel Pitel, a Recreation Leader with the Senior Section of the Parks and Recreation
Department, was instrumental in putting this program together and will accept the
Proclamation on behalf of the Delta Sigma Fraternity.
~ l-/tt - /
COMMENDING THE DELTA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY
FOR THEIR COMMUNITY SERVICE
IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, San Diego State University's Delta Sigma Phi Fraternity was involved
in an Intergenerational Program with older citizens of Chula Vista; and
WHEREAS, Jake Anderson, Matt Blair, Paul Caramat, Ryan Clark, Sean Karjala,
Joel Pitel, Scott Samuelson and Winnie Tolentino worked many hours in assisting the
seniors move to the new Senior Center; and
WHEREAS, Intergenerational programs promote a better understanding and
enhance the relationship between young people and senior citizens; and
WHEREAS, it is most fitting that the City of Chula Vista commend the Delta Sigma
Phi Fraternity for their service to the community and for their efforts in strengthening the
ties between the generations:
NOW, THEREFORE, I, TIM NADER, Mayor of the City of Chula Vista, California,
do hereby COMMEND THE DELTA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY FOR THEIR
COMMUNITY SERVICE in the City of Chula Vista, California.
~r~-~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item:.Y b
Meeting date: May 5.1992
SUBlVllTnW BY:
PROCLAMATION: Proclaiming Mayas Older American's
Month
Director of Parks and Recreation ~ $)
ITEM TITLE:
May is the month that the nation takes time to acknowledge and celebrate the achievements and
contributions of its older citizens.
The successful growth and development of Chula Vista is due in great measure to those who are
now senior citizens.
Thousands of volunteer hours are expended each month by seniors who assist hundreds of
agencies. This donation of time, skill and expertise enables agencies to greatly enhance their
services, thus benefitting the whole Community.
Increasing numbers of senior citizens are actively assisting the City by serving on Boards and
Commissions thus sharing their education, wisdom and expertise gained thru a lifetime of
experience.
It is most fitting that the City join with the State, County and the Nation in paying tribute to the
elder citizens of Chula Vista.
46-1
PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF MAY 1992 AS
"OLDER AMERICANS MONTH"
IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, May is the month that the nation takes time to acknowledge and
celebrate the achievements and contributions of its older citizens; and
WHEREAS, the successful growth and development of Chula Vista are due in
great measure to those who are now senior citizens; and
WHEREAS, increasing numbers of senior citizens are sharing their wealth of
knowledge and experience by participating in sustaining, and guiding our plans for the
future; and
WHEREAS, it is most fitting that the City of Chula Vista join with other cities, the
State of California, and our federal government to acknowledge the contributions of
senior citizens with due recognition:
NOW, THEREFORE, I, TIM NADER, Mayor of the City of Chula Vista, California,
do hereby declare the month of May 1992 as .OLDER AMERICANS MONTH" in the City
of Chula Vista, California. I wish to express appreciation to each and every senior citizen
who has given so generously to their community.
4'0-2.
"
COUNC:IL AGENDA STATEMENT
:ITEM k
MEET:ING DATE
5/5/92
:ITEM '1':I'1'LB:
Proclamation - Proclaiming the Week of May 3 through May 9, 1992 as
"YOUTH WEEK"
SUBM:ITTED BY: Mayor Tim Nad~~
(4/S'1'BS VOTE: YES_ NO*,
The proclamation declaring the week of May 3 through May 9, 1992 as
"YOUTH WEEK" will be presented by Mayor Nader to Bill Walthen, Exhalted
Ruler of the Chula Vista Elks Lodge. and Garry Hummel, Youth Activity Chairman.
~c. -I
.,.,.;...".;.',~",.c" ~ .^
-- .""" -. _.
PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF MAY 3 THROUGH MAY 9, 1992 AS
"YOUTH WEEK"
IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks has designated the week
beginning May 3 through May 9, 1992 as "YOUTH WEEK" to honor America's Junior
Citizens for their accomplishments, and to give fitting recognition of their services to
community, state and nation; and
WHEREAS, Chula Vista Lodge No. 2011 will sponsor an observance on May 5,
1992 in tribute to the Junior Citizens of this community; and
WHEREAS, no event could be more deserving of our support and participation
than one dedicated to these young people who represent the nation's greatest resource,
and who in the years ahead will assume the responsibility for the advancement of our free
society; and
WHEREAS, our youth need the guidance, inspiration and encouragement which
we can give in order to develop those qualities of character essential for future leadership
and go forth to serve America; and
WHEREAS, to achieve this worthy objective we should demonstrate our
partnership with youth, our understanding of their hopes and aspirations and a sincere
willingness to help prepare them in every way for the responsibilities and opportunities
of citizenship:
NOW, THEREFORE, I, TIM NADER, Mayor of the City of Chula Vista, California,
do hereby proclaim the week of May 3 through May 9, 1992 as "YOUTH WEEK" in the
City of Chula Vista, California and urge all departments of government, civic, fraternal and
patriotic groups, and our citizens generally, to participate wholeheartedly in its
observance.
Qc~Z
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 5~
Meeting Date 5/5/92
ITEM TITLE:
Claim Against the City
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Personnel r:.fr
(4/5ths Vote: Yes___ No~)
REVIEWED BY:
/,
City Manager jj
Claimant No.1:
Ms. Maria C. Becerra
c/o Donald A. Hon
Attorney at Law
2232 El Cajon Boulevard
San Diego, CA 92104-1194
On March 30, 1992, Ms. Maria C. Becerra filed a claim against the
City of Chula vista for personal injuries she allegedly received on October
31, 1991, when she tripped and fell near a bus stop on Third Avenue. The
claim seeks damages within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court.
Although liability is questionable, we are continuing our investiga-
tion and it is desirable to start the statute of limitations. It is the
recommendation of our claims adjustors, Carl Warren &. Company, concurred in
by Risk Management, that this claim be denied.
RECOMMENDATION: Deny the above claim.
j
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
5'.". -)
.
V
\'" "
,,~..'i:) t~V(Ao.'Y
~< \~ 9> \:
t'" ,,9 ~
l ,"
~t,t:. ~'+
ORDINANCE NO. ~.5J)
S~c.
Ol\tb
~~bl;v.
G'~b
'9Dot>
7)OJ\f
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE CHULA
VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW
CHAPTER 15.54 ESTABLISHING
P:ROCEDVRES FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND
COLLECTION OF SRIDGE AND
THO:ROUGHFARE FEES
.
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista do.. ordain a.
followsl
SECTION II That Chapter 15.54 of the Chula vista City Municipal
Code is hereby added to read as followsl
Sec. 15.54.010 purpose.
The purpoee of this Chapter 15.54 i. to make provision for
asse.sing and collecting fees within specified Areas of
Benefit (defined hereinbelow) as a condition of approval of .
final map or a. a condition of issuing a building permit for
purposes of defraying the actual or estimated oost of
constructing bridges over waterways, railways, freeways, and
canyons or major thoroughfare. pursuant to Section 66484 of
the Map Act and the charter powers of the City of Chula Vista.
Sec. 15.54.020 Definitions.
Whenever the following Words are us.d in this Chapter, they
shall have the following meaning. I
A. "Area of Benefit" means a defined geographio area
established pureuant to the provisions of Section 3 hereof.
B. "Sridge" means an original. bridge aervinq an Area of
Benefit or an addition to any existing bridge facility serving
an Area of Benefit at the time of establishment of the
~oundaries of suoh Area of Benefit. Any such original ~ridie
or eXistinq ~r1dq. must provide a crossinq of a railwai'
freeway, stream or canyon for which a bridqe croning 8
required pursuant to the transportation or floC>d. control
provisions of the General Plan of the City.
e. "construction" mean., a. to any :Improvement, design,
engineering, plan checJtinV, inspection, surveying, acquisition
of right-of-way, environmental review, preparation of plans
and specifications, administration of construction contracts,
actual construction of such Improvement and any appurtenance.
thereto or the acquiSition of any such Improvement and any
suoh appurtenancea, and. any other work. incidental to the
acquiSition or oonstruction of such Improvement..
.
.
,../
ri
'~
c'
D. "Major Thorouqhfare" meana a' roadway as .ho....n on the ........,
Circulation Element Of the General Plan of the City the
primary purp08e of which ia to carry throuqh traffic na to
provide a networ~ connecting to the state high....ay s em and
which roadway is in ,addition to, or a reconstructi Of, any
eXisting such roadway ..rvinq an Area of Benefit t the time
of adoption ot the ~oundaries of such Area of nsfit.
E. "CirCUlation Element" mean. the circulati Element of the
General Plan of the city heretofore ado ed by the City
pursuant to Chapter 3 Of Title 7 of t Governlnent Code,
together with any additions or amendme s thereto hereafter
adopted.
ajor Thoroughfare.
F. "Xmprovement" means any Briage
Sec. 15.54.030 Establishment of
A. The City Counoil shall set time ana place of a publio
hearing to consider the e.tabl! ent of any proposed Area of
Benefit. Notioe of the public earing shall be given pursuant
to Government Code Section 6 91. Such notice shall contain
preliminary information re ted to the boundaries of the
proposed Area of Benefit, estimatea coat of the Bridge,s)
or Maj or Thoroughfare'.) to e tinanoed from the teu proposed
to be assessed within th proposed Area of Benefit and the
proposed method of appor ottment of tees to ~e a8seB8e~ and ~
collected within the Are of Benefit.
8. At any time not 1 ter than the hour .et for hearing
objections to the esta ishment of a proposed Area of Benefit,
any owner of property, to be benefitted by the Improvements
proposed to be tinanc d through the assessment and collection
of fees within the a of Benefit may tile a written protest
against the establi ent of the Area of Benefit, the extent
of the Area of Be stit, the Improvements proposed to be
financed or any com inatiorl thereof. Such protests must be in
writing, must cont n a description of the propert~ for which
the protest i. ing filed sufficient to identify such
property and must e signed by the owner of such propert~. If
the person signi such a protest i8 not shown on the last
equalized asses. ent roll as the owner Of the property for
which the prot t is being filed, the protest must be
accompanied by itten evidence that such signer is the owner
of such propert .
All protests st be delivered to the City Cler~ and no other
protest or objection shall be considered. Any protest may be
withdrawn by the owner who made .uch prot..t it such
withdrawal is in writing and i. delivered to the city Clerk
time prior to the conclusion Of the public hearing.
..-",
2
-~.~~
~..."
Ite~~
. t>..\f)<('\\O~' Meet i ng Date 4/ dl/3:! 5:1 ~/~
ITEM TITLE: Ordinanc~. ~~J';I of the City of Chula Vista amending
Tit~e :&-~f the Chula Vista Municipal Code by adding a new
Ch 15.54 establishing procedures for the assessment and
CO~l ection of bridge and thoroughfare fees .
SUBMITTED B1r~" Director of Public wor~~
REVIEWED BY: City Manage? (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No_x..>
The proposed ordinance would enable the City to establish a fee district
pursuant to Section 66484 of the Map Act and the charter powers of the City of
Chul a Vista.
RECOMMENDATION: Place ordinance on first reading;
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
.
Chapter 15.50 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code deals with reimbursement
districts for public improvements but specifically excludes public
improvements that are installed in conjunction with a proceeding for which
assessments are levied. However, in some cases this is desirable and the
ordinance before Council addresses that.
By adoption of this Ordinance, the City Council would enact procedures
pursuant to which it may establish a fee to overlay Assessment District No.
90-2 (Otay Valley Road) to be assessed and collected in the event that
properties within the proposed Assessment District are developed at a level of
intensity higher than that assumed in establ ishing the assessments for the
Assessment District.
The Ordinance itself is proposed to be enacted under the authority of both the
Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and the charter authority of
the City of Chula Vista. The Subdivision Map allows a city to enact an
ordinance to establish procedures for the assessment and collection of bridge
and thoroughfare fees as a condition of the approval of a final map or as a
condition of the issuance of a building permit pertaining to properties within
the defined areas of benefit.
The Ordinance itself is an enabl i ng ordinance, 1.e., it establi shes procedures
pursuant to which a specific bridge of thoroughfare fee may be established.
If enacted, the City Council would be authorized to establish a bridge or
thoroughfare fee within a defined area of benefit pursuant to the following
procedures:
.
~~
~ ,. /
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date
~
4/28/92
1. Based upon the recommendation of City staff to establ ish a bridge or
thoroughfare fee within a defined area of benefit, the City Council would
be required to schedule a public hearing to consider the establishment of
such a fee and area of benefit.
2. Notice of the public hearing would be provided to all affected property
owners. The notice would describe the proposed area of benefit, the
estimate of the cost of the bridge or major thoroughfare facilities to be
financed through the assessment and collection of fees, and the proposed
method of apportionment of the fees.
3. At the time and place of the publ ic hearing, the City Council would
receive evidence and testimony from interested parties regarding the
proposed fee and area of benefit. Owners of property proposed to be
subject to the assessment of the fee may file a written protest against
the establ i shment of the area of benefi t, the boundari es of the area of
benefi t or the improvements proposed to be fi nanced. If a majori ty of
the property owners within a proposed area of benefit file a written
protest against the establishment of the area of benefit or the bridge or
thoroughfare fee, the proceedings must be abandoned and the City Council
may not initiate proceedings to establish the same area of benefit and
fee for a period of one {I} year.
4. Assuming that a majority protest does not exist, the City Council may, by
resolution, establish the area of benefit and the bridge or thoroughfare
fee. The resolution is thereafter recorded in the Office of the County
Recorder in order to provide notice to affected property owners of the
fee obligation.
The fee would be payable as a condition of approval of a final map or as a
condition of the issuance of a building permit for property within an
established area of benefit. The Ordinance contains provisions which would
authorize the City Council to accept an alternative consideration in lieu of
the payment of the fee, e.g., construction of all or a portion of the
improvements to be financed from the fees. Additionally, the Ordinance
contains provisions which would allow the City Council to provide a credit
against the payment of fees. Such a credit could, for example, be provided
where the bridge or major thoroughfare improvements to be financed from the
proceeds of the fee is initially financed through the issuance of assessment
district or community facilities district bonds.
It is proposed that following enactment of the Ordinance an area of benefit be
establ ished for the properties within. the boundaries of Assessment District
No. 90-2 {Otay Valley Road} for the purpose of providing for the assessment
and collection of a fee to reimburse the Assessment District for the costs of
construction of Otay Valley Road. The fee would be based upon a specific
dollar amount per daily vehicle trips estimated to be generated from a
particular parcel assuming development in accordance with the General Plan.
,-- cr- ,)..
fc...~
-.,
-.,
-,.,
.
.
.
Page 3, Item ~
Meeting Date 4/28/92
If a property wi thi n the Assessment Di stri ct is permi tted to develop at a
level of intensity which would cause the generation of more daily vehicle
trips than that reflected in the assessment on such property, the property
owner would be required to pay a thoroughfare fee representing the increased
daily vehicle trips resulting from the actual development of the property.
This fee would be used to redeem Assessment District bonds prior to maturity,
thus lowering the amount of the annual assessment installment payable by other
property owners within the Assessment District.
FISCAL IMPACT: None to the City.
Exhibit Schedule:
A. Ordinance
B. Map Act, Section 66484
C. Chapter 15.50 of Municipal Code (Ord. 1764)
D. Council Report on Ordinance 1764
DDS:fp/AY-081, AY-OOl
WPC 5977E
~
b.~
~
TInS PAGE BLANK
.
-.,
""""\
~~r--
t..~
1 ~~~! ~ m~~ l~~j~~~f !~I~~~ m~~ ~ ~&~~&~!~ gs~~~ ~~
. -; ~ ::: ;; e ,g -!:J g. ::> '8 ~ '" 1: ~ E lS - c &:! &. ~ leO; i ~ I1l ~ ~ I1l ;'I!! e 'f.i l! :.~ & -; '"
& !I~i ~ ~8~ ~~Q.Jglll !I!;~I 1-!:J-!:J ~ mlllll!i~ m!~m~ ~~
! 'O&lll:.o- g c.]!l! .eE~lli~-]i C>.91'" :~ .288 g lS~.a.a~.a~11l .!!!I!!~lSl!! '8'iij
i ilt~ I I~~ liBI.i!1 II~III il~ I~t~~j~~~~ ~ll~i i~
'lI ,.,,, 'iij III '" li = III ::> C III 'Iii '" ::> C '" .. - p ~ e :g ...- '8 Ii '" 0 ~l! s;! . c ,;g ~,E .<= .- 5
! Ii!~; ~ Q.'O~ ~~fi~:;8~! Il!~~tl ~~= 1ll!lc~~5~Ill~i~' gl!!M li.2
o ~cl~ I ~~= ,~!~'O;t; ::>;lio ~~~ ~i~l~t~tr"'i~II~! ~:
~ lSl~l 'Iii .~i!'~".<=I]t'8~- '8~~~IQ. c~i l;jc~'~o'lii81l~c"''''~~- ~~
. ::~.8~ ~~~~~~'Oc:~ lS~!'t !:~~H!I! .~~ >!1Q.a~s""g,~~.U~'8~;-1
:'E.~1~~ !1~lill~I~II!'8~~~~~~8~ ~:1 ~:II~mlSji.~~e~~~ ~~
: ~'Iii~~ o~~"'~.<=",~llll]i.~!'Q.lll:-i~~ ~~ l~s~~~::!'Os c~lli ~E
-:II)_~lSl ItlSll!~I!II;illl~~~jl iil ~'Oll~l~ill~lii~~ ~]
!1ll0 .2 "e"'8~ c:~",c>",m"li~elioco-~ l'Oi nlc",...a,.,~~"'U::>E,.,.2Elll ~~
o~ S 0 ~ ~ _Crartl.oc~cac^c>>;;--QO . - cu' ~_~~-:J:C..t::.2.!2'-racae~ -I
A. _ OQ)'" ....e-:t:::: ._-uG:l- Cl)c....cucn en C - ",--CUoD -.o1/)- -m
!!,Hlj l~~t U P~~i~~il~) :~]~ ~ J .1 ~ ~ ll~l,g s'~i~t ~ lS ~ ~ ~
ii~II' it:~i~~~B~.~~~il~lltsl~i~lr!I:(l~~(ltlljitll~
li!!!l !i~i!i1Ii!i~it!~lill~~!i!,:!~1~fliifi[~I~ii~;
-:'8~l!_ il~I~~~1.8~'8~:IEI"'8~~I~:Ill'~"'=~1:'8~8~~l'O.~:,g-~~li'
!ilij! ~!I'~!lllllillts8~!~~I~i~l~ili!~I!!I!II~I!I!~llr~
.c.!~~!:"15 oos;!_,,"'.!!!"'''''-:!!gC .lo1-"~5.!.!!"''<=E'' 2l! ill.....E" g'!!!"'~ E -
= ~:'Oli~ t~ ~~.~~~l!!i~~~~~itli~ l;~~1= ~g~i~ ~iiti'~~.. ~U U~ li'~
Eco~~'l- '" ~= ~'=_1:~..;i!- .E'O'liC .E!5 ._col!!' '8 ill"'t:"'_IllO"'~I-'f.i
~~~. ~ I!!c>", 8'OO",~~~~ ~c'8lc x~'8 ~i~~.<='8 lSS=~!-!:J~~ ~2
j' ~i~~~E~e~u~E~~..~~~fl~~~~~l~~~"'o~i~~s~co!l!~~~~lii;o~~<r~~~~<~8
coc~ ~..~::> ct:co", 1ll~_I::>_ -I' ~-- cn ~ ".<=~~~
~~ 8~ l ~ cfi ';;:g~lllt= ~lS"l!! '" i~"'13 8: ~ ~~ U m~"~ -5>'.5 h '"
~S '0 li '0 Ii 8 ~ 2 e.E .. 8 .. lS '0 .!I! li. 8 l; _ S Ill, S '" S 1: 1: lS 8 m Ii .e Ii ~ ill m =
J,
~ ~ II . , - t:. )( 1-/1 B IT B
..
e
iI)
12
~
~
.Q
t-
o.~tn
c5t;)
c>>~.,..
E-o
i~1C
~l'5
lS ~;a
'im0
c~~
i~~
'" 0 Q.
~ ~2
CDI!O
:;'~i.
;a"
.c-
j~'"
~!~
Q.C
..lll
lllQ.
;l
I'i
Ii
c
u
-~m~it 'E-c~ m
'Ollie ::>cc "5
o.a III "
"2j~~ ~;ai ~
~ .ElS !1j1 Ii
to CP.~ Q) -'t:: cu CD
P.~COE'> cacoE =
,.,.!!! '" 'Iii .<= Q." c
c:.5G~0 :t;c>>i :s
"~>'2> "'=c .'"
E-li.!l! ~Eo ,.
e!= CD o,g"i :g ~
Ui:-06= li'88. E l:l-
~i~~ ~l!o ~ ~CD
u,:=>>S ~!.~ - <D~
'iiji:!5 ~1ilt: j ~'O
o~~~ S'E2 ;g ~IC
canoro 8=,i!i: E US'S
'" ~c m in ~ ~ c 1ii
. ~.-!lJ 5 0 m ! !!! g;; lS :0 1'ii
'lIlllCE.<=Q-lll "'- "'.
EQ.lX..~E-'Oe~"&l11l ~~
oll!- ""-:~l!o; ::>=:~ E!~
!-~=~g>.a!~8~ ~!l
l~!! ::>!l~~ Ie ~~
.~a~!s~e.iCl)c~~ .
'; .~ po;,2 .! 1l ,g. d .~S2 OJ! '8
_ >..Cl V,I -.. co CD CD - ~
iQ)il1l!fiosi;=ClJC6.E~
~~ lSle.l:1!! hli s ~l!~
te.. Q)~E0Q).2~ ~.a
,S2~Q; :.~o lie ",;J! '" ~
-.2~c "'c.c:..._~
a!~16<!~1ijii~o~:
E._~ . OLL.&:..c: Q)LL c<
85~~lS ~;~ m
.~~=5C:-: ~Q)'o ...
",:=,,;~.2!1ic~s:oou
j< c>" CO,__I!! 0 "'-&-
~~:gE a;a:g ~
"e ::loS'!; =-0-5 ora
,,8'O~ 'Oli'O ~
.
III
!
iii
GI
-
u
1:
-
.
~106 >."CQ).c: >.'CCD";
~2Q) ESE.Q i~=::I~
..... "'_ (OJ::. .-...
",~g> !!l"'''';; ;:'-0
.!!".E 0';;;"':; ."i.o
mCm m.c:oS.,:: Cf.I.1!}-
-0;: __ >- "'oco=_=
"5"5~ ~c:::.S't: --
j lE.!!l :e'8 ~ ~~g
o~~ ~~-go. 8::lQ)e~
_~_ -cCl)=Q) .co.>
,.,. ",'=8= -E'"
~ c: Q. n ov .! ~.- -5
U~E ~~~~ ='8!;f:
lilS. 8.95~ oE=s_
-oe ~~~~ ~~~gjt!?
~ a.; ~ ~ a. -0 .2 ~.2 e.~
..~Q)Q) Oell _OCi)::l-o
g!~En --c:::cn-; coo-(/)
6 ..a; >it"= ~-~..'"
_~"'= ~c;Jo ~:28C>~
'0 _ '" 8 Q.- Il- '" Ii .~..
';c:::-5 Cl)C_e 0) m<<l5
..~.Ei U",g !l=-g~
.'8i.l~= _Il~~-o - 'O"~
l'CQ)cco -~ SO~aM
~:;~~ ..fljs'iij >!C.<=_~
.eS.c:'~ "5G)~::I e~~.2i
.",""l! ~_~;..~_ co.<=",51
:I~ '" ::>.- ;J 't: -.<=- '"
-=l!21\l ~~l!~l!!.\l~~<'>
~2~~'O ,g~p~~~j!'Oi
. '" ~ !! - ~ 2 Ii III '81: !!l - "':g
';.~~~~ ~a;~-5"&l= ~I~~
l'-"~'" O~_lll_lll", !l>
h!= li.~ ~ ~8~!~'!
eC1l-:S eOQ;co>-Q)=Q)~
. '" ~ '8 I!! ~ c i .! 1ii ~ 0 ""i'
a: .2 ~ "&l" s :g 0 :;; .5 ~ .U -
~ =1: "co.lo!~ 't: ~
'" 8 '8 OJ :i!:; j a. 8.~ >-
f! ~..~u ~ -e:B g 5 ~ u ~'li.g
I<-.~~ "I~ ~tii-:~~!
~ '" '" III E!- !li ",.9
o.~ .Cl 0. Q. al ~ -5 (lIS
. 10m (l)C CD !€,o 'C"C"': 0 016,..:'0
f- ~aaCO =coc:::Q)i~~ S.c::g~
~~>-~ S~~~UEo. EU)o~
~"'B~ i'e~~~~~ ~l!j",
_= U) co~ec:::= "C ococo~
'I OO]CD c::=~:8=50 CD-.Sa.
5.~m~ CG c:: C1l~ g=M =~1i) E
I: _.. -_ Q.~"'::>O"~ ,.,"''''-
S ~~~o ~~~~~3c:: ~~~~
~ C::CD~C ~~=U-~CD ~c~~
~ 8~1~ ~Eg!~~! !~c::j
.. .. '" -=,., c>.! ,,= B! N ~ a; 1: '"
! ~m -Ii !15.l:1og-.5l ."CIl'O"g
o i2~CD _~~~~~CD ~gmQ
u -~I~..~=~.~m~= =c~5
. ! ~'iij 2''8 c '" co';;: Q ",!, JJ1 III '" ~
_ 05-~~CD5io~1i)~ ~~=E
. 1: - vr >-.S!l E'(ii CI') a. ~ >-.$: C. '-= - -
. CD.'t:' >- tV 10 ~.- OJ CD C. CI') c.::= m a 0 ~
_ EE"E","'~C'<=~"'oc", ~'"
I ~"'!"''''CQ.~;;''Ill~t:~i~i
"Q.",ol;;o_"'_Eit "'->~~
Q.c>-c'.-oE! .'c:r.CQ.''''.- -
CDCRlm CU=uCl')c.OJ OJ~O 0
:=~:~~~8&~~;J~;!~m~
-~!~~oE~ ~=o_t-~=CDm
til:",!~.!1~gj~2.5;a2=.!
E Q)ClCD~=,-==O!a U)m=CI')o~
I~~..2'glS~I~1l5lS"'~~~
! CG=,~CI')~~~~~~~~~~~.$:c::
I E~c>;J.!!'liilSlgg~~~z~~
!.~O~E~~'t:UiEE!~li.NQ.'ci
ll" 5 u g- lS 8. c - 0 '"&l- ~.lo! '" '8 ,Q .
c'-2"~c 00.<= ~nO__
. ._.1::::~Il::-_eI')>-m- -cc:i:C;CU
!~l!~S2",'.CC0~C ...."'E
-ji28S~!I~~BIS8lSl~SIll
"sq m-o'2,O o~ o.l E 1 g.o m'!: I
I:~", 1ll=~-o6-m~-~"'",~-
.~m~e~~Sesoj~E~~m~
O~ 8 c>'- ",. lll".<= "Ill c "
c:C: CDCDC:- c:_ ='-0
fi-aru.2 Cl~ m~~.S! 0 ~~=
~!105i~~~~~m~rN~t~
- m E CI') CI') -_ >. mo ~ '" ~e - 0 - CD
c'-Sel') om... ~ --.t.
'"' 'Iii ~ ",;J ~- -!; .;;: ! t~ -
..", - "'i .lo!pc_ "Ul!
~~5S 5ot: iiS.g.e .!:co
I
-~
~ ~~~ ~j& "0 i!~~&i~~~om~ lm
j ~:~ ;!] i ~~i~~~~II~j~i~:
Q, 'Ec::r. C' i: 2 G:lBc:)C'scee.0Q)OCl)=
~ ",,,,O~-"'al - ~-gS",,,,.<:,,,OOU"C:=~-oo
~ u(l)~Ecec ~ 8~~cooQ)i" Q,m 2c-
Rl ~'E:oa>cuSa 8"", .6 a15C1l_~u;.804l~€_.2i
'" > '" '" E ~~.<: - . c: >- . '" 0 _ " '" ~= ~ '" "'_
~ ~E-a> 00. ~C~~1e.~mo~~_,.t", C:Sc:l3
,. C'CIQ)G:I> ~c "'o"'~-~"'c~_oo ~ ~
o ~>oe-e- -~~~c~,..-mo -mG:l ~B
~ me~Q,~o~ ~2~~~(I)ml~~~Bc~o~m
~ Ea..oEe=G:I 'O_-J2c"oou .f:gtr.l (68."0 (I) 0..0
. cE'- ,.C CI)'" z:.oltlSxco... "E>cOU; c
a. R~I~!f~ t~i~li~;!~~EQ)~8~1
~ i~~=i:! ~m~oQ)~~~~1s8~~~i8
E UJ.E 0."0 016 - .fi.J:. 5 ~ C'CI ~ ~ ~= ~ "6 ~ Cfl 'g"0 ~
C ~UEcl(l)",.J:. 5C'C1~E.~~-CI)~oO'EU;~~"0~
o -2eo- Cf.l._ >Cf)'C~CC-)(U .-o..c Q)
.- 0__---;;:'" 1;;-g ._-c:u,,8.C:'" "'.s;x--~-o
i -~(I)oS~~ ~C'CI5&~gQ))(~~C€EQ)ocS
I i!~li;t ifl~!~:ili~I~li~~
'" l!! 0 i S l!! f15 c:!!! '" 5, u c: - ~ & = c . 0 '" _
0.",. ". '" -'E--.-l!!01;;!!!", "'''''''c:>;''''<:
-"'~8 "'~ ~ al =~~~K""'~~"'''' u"'~
~ j ~ CD i'; !I!"O.5 ~ ~ .5 'C 16 .5 ;g:E ~ E :: 19 ~ i i",~ e
;;)-"''<:~oa>c:Oi oal'" .",~E-oiiloOO", ~o
~~~~2i~~= ~U(l)~SCS=i~Ciig~",:a~
a."c:"'-oc:c:u- . 2""-0 -- -8-''''''' .<: 0
'" ._", n. c .-'- 2 0 . c CI) "0 CD 3t .$ CU 'c 0 E _ C '_",
-oE ~-cn -cno-",c:_- ~u - -0_0
CD oO.o::oo'iiiC-o'-~ ,_,-oa"cu>.CDO::J=_o'-e
a~o.::"C- o.c CD eU 8a.. "~ e e e e=c: CD a.. CI) ei ~
Ew E E Cb-oOo~ ~o 0
.g ~.- c: ~ al.- 8 >-.a S _ _2 c: - -'" ~ '" c:.S; '" _._ B ,g '"
~!~~a..O~~m[~~ouOge2m~CD",~~~~~~~
~-ew =c~ a..8e2b--_a..o ~_=~
~~~~!j~i!~.8'iiigj!~~~~I]i~!~~
~""'~.a"''''-~'''E!!!C:oQE8-oouC''''''-oE'''_
--.!!l-0-"'-"'",il",,.8uc:-o' .2o.!!l =",C:-o.5'"
-P-N-o"'", R"''E "'_-_. ._'" g~~"'.o",,,,,,,.<:.s!'
5~~~~~~~~~CDS~&~~~__~~~~~~a~
~~<~",&~<im=F~~'c~g~S~~~~~~~~Z~
o a.. U) :c 0 nlm '-Q)CDn:I-CU-o" c_ 0
~ ~~e", ~lnlE >-","~~g~~~C:"~~~~~~~E i.
'" "'111 c:'" oo--c: c: -.,'" -U-
C"Ca~EE~-CD~e's U;~o~S~~U2o.CD~2~
-'~-~~~-~E:.b-9 oE5~-Em~Q)""''iii.fi 'iiic
8 EeE l~5 ~ m~@~~g~s~c~~ e!
~ E~I !~~ . ~8",=u=~~~8IE 8~
0;
III
-
~
'"
.l!!
.a
ill
-0 "~cn ..Q)c"CCI)(Pmc~m Ole"'C....
~SCD =SnI~gCl)~~ ~ S~S~
t~~.~gs~~~~"C:~I~E..E
"0.5 _!!!.l5 l!! ~ ,,; !!! 2"~ " !!l 8 E -0 -l!1 ~ 1ll!! C:o
"'-on:lQ)~Q)a..~n.="'CnlQ)-o c_
o ~ g e:C f1) m ~ e Q. ~"6 0 _ m m ~.5.2 '5
G:l>.O~~CI)C~CUQ)C'tI .Boca..", .~o.
~~~U~~CU CI)~E~- CD =~~o.
:: .:0 2 e-Q.~ ~-'C: C'l:I a.. ~a.. 53 >.0 t:: C'tI
o >. e 'ii5 0 0 _ - c S Q. a. 0 = ~ ~.o O'l 0 CD
~~8c8S~~o1~m~~:~~~~~~
~tn:l oC'tle~e~o~5~~-~c~"6
-;:;: CI) "6 'm ~ Q) 0 (,) n:I ~ ,- '-", - e -0 0,2 ftl "'C
"'" ~"'-"'-~5 00 c:nc:o
CD~a..'iiie~CD~~~CI)~~-~CI)~~-E'<:
~8[8~o.~~~~CDa..eo~gm~=m
CJ)(ti Ctl"'C.E CI):: 5,..0 e Co 0 c.'~,2.1i).s::: 0 Q) E
oS~~U2J~c~~:csg:~lg=5,.CD
c m mea.. .- - ~ ~'- >. ~ .0 C c.s:::
~-cE'ii5oQ)C:~a..~c(timftlQ.~C'tI~-
"'''''''=c:_E8~ae~~-o--~''--g
OCDCUCl)OCCD a..ftlo~O OeC'tl~c8'"
m~o~~~m~~E=c~g~cBa_~
JCDa..-oo~cocoa..ce>.n.8_c~CI)
=0~~~~,g=0",a",8!!!c:ul!! ~"'.<:8
.~n"c:~",~>-", - "'g~i!:"'-o
"1 -- " ~ 0 '" - 0 c: '" E -l!: . "'", '" .", '" '"
~U~U ~""''''u 0- .<: ~ 0-
~>.~cu~,-ucu ~~~ftlu=~~_~
oeC'tl~C'tI~~oa..~CI)~ -~a..~~~E
fM "'~= U !;1"u-u; ~=11 '" E N ~ 0;;= c:'"
~- ~CD'-0C~e~~ CWftlCD0
c05~~~~~E-~~~-~.O~~~~
l!oCl);'~mmo~ftI"'C- mo~CI)-_
'-~-C'tI E-~CDC~CDC.s:::"'CftlCD~~~
~~g8~~~B~~~i~~~i~11~~j
-0) ftI-3t~e't:!:2.ta~n.~~.-=eQ. co_
:i~~~~iB8.~eZ-g~aE~B~jg
~C:="'0-"'C:"'m~~'" 08."'c:-~'"
';~ g.; ~~~.~ ~-=.,g~~~i ~S.~~(J):
g~~~~lg"Eit~E!!!-gIc:~s-g~~~
-~_~ --o'<:"'c:"'-", --0 ",_
"C "5 :' ~ ~ ~ m ctl '0 ~ CtI Q).r:. .. ..5 .~ ~ m c: ~
mZ:E~~~~~~~g~E~C'tI~~~~~
=i;'Em ~>.m;e.S!nl~CD.s::: ftI
"'C ~ Q) ! 0):; Gi ~ S !:2..s::: - :2 ~ .~ -g
. c:"'~'" ~c:c:B>-",,,,g~_,,,,,,,
MCiC'tl.s::: 0_12;:".0 CD CD ~ t: >.C._ CDN a.. C'.8
1'-",-s"'---~"'~"''''~OiOi-~l!!
~e"'C3t O.s:::CDCDU3tCl)Ua.. ctlCD
~3~~ m~==S~.~I~ Is=
O~~.~ Bigo.~~a.m~ .aSS
,
m
'""'"
= ftlO~m0~DCD.r:.emQ)CD~ CD 0", CDctlctl ~ctlctl~~~ctl m CCDCD~~OCl)~ C ctl~CD~=~~
~ e;c=~~~~.~~CI)==~ Sa.. S~~ ~!S~~~= E ~=a .r:.c~ctl - ~~=m!CDQ)
! :"8Ec:"'~~8m1ii=l!!g8 l:l~ l:l~~g,,~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~S~fj= ~ 1~~;;~1i
.<: .0 '" "'.<: 0 c: ~ <> i!.- - '" '" '" ",-.- al-- -0 "'.<: ~ c: c: '" c:.- E'<: u" E '" ~ . c: c: > =
r i~I"'~~i!fil8.~~1i~ 1~.li~~~.~t:i~ ; ~I.~~I!", ~~g~I~~K~
= '" c: 8.:6 '" '" =:E ;! 0 E . '" '" al 0 c: al.!!! .0 - .8 '" '" ~ "'-= 2 . > 0 '" 0 >- c: 0.0 . c: c: .i- '" P .<: E ~
~ 1,g~~~I:~tl~~~I~ ~~~~;~s~>-!i~li~", . g~!~E~8~~j,g.g .8~~i~~~
a.. cu~ Si~ctlOctl-C&-a.. ~o_~>'m CtI0D~~-_ ~ -cu~ .cctl>~~CtI~ =CDu-.s::: C
i II!JI~~~I:~~:! !'~!I~';~!i~11 :~I:~il:lllllllllfiJ~
E .8 ~ c: al '" '" 8 ~.!!! 0 '" l!l 0 .0 g> ~.o c:.<: l;l '" ~ - B ~ g> ~ Q 16:: 2 ~_ 1ii - '" ~ '" l!! l!! ~ -g ~ c: ::;; .2 i! K
~ ~~ii]~!i~i~~~j !~!!~~i!~~K8.jal~",~~ ~~j~~il-~~~~~~ii~!~~ljs
"0 g>Q)E-:a.=CDQ)!?~Q.~CI)U) CtI>.O!C'tI'~'cm~ o;SE ~11l0o"5Q.S ~OCD~:O~~a..S=c'c:~
. ~ -EU~ftIo. eCl) Cn:l~ _ ~ ~ ~_ _ _ftIEc~ eo _ 0._
! 1;~I~~j~=Z;I!~ 1;1~~lr!~~~:IK ~:;jl~I~~*~I~:~'~2?IE.
iil ~"'al~lii.~~g~'EO !g-g!~.8II~~~=~s ~'Eg1;;8.~K~.IK~~llal~!~~U
G:l ~~.s:::S "'C~~~~;OCD~ o.-~O~I1lCDCDCDmCC~CD 5m~~ftI'e~coE~CD"'C.s:::ee.s:::~~2
-= a."'~'" ~~I~~~~[~ ~B&~!!~~I*~!~~ 1~~~I~~g~~j!!:~~~SlI1i~
! ctl~~I~~SEm~8&[~ E0!E~g~~cctl~~~0 >,~o=i~~ =.s:::::-~O~0.11l1~~8
: !0i~~~!~~~al"'Ki!:i",~.tgit'~81~"'!ial~! ~:5!;~~~~II~c:OII~=fi:g~.5E'<:I~
U "'Em ~-"2o~c:cn _a.. c.u Q..1::.c..CD'" 0 .'!::'.,:- itCDGlCl).ocz:.t:::-CtIo :;,._._a..n:I~p , _
~~~;~-CtI~~o~oC'tl~2S ~~c~m ~~ =~-go ~~ ~ ~ ~e~ ~~S~CD~~ 0
:.~=illl~~ti~ill~~~I~,I~!;!~J1i ~rllllil~I!li~!i~I~IJ
Illllj!llililil!III~IIIII!;I~tl ill~il!ill;tiif!tlll:
~i!B~~.~<~~~~~g>I~-B~~~~i!~Bc:e~~~1 ~a.~-8~~~E'E"'"EI,l!!"'~~~~=",
!jl!;lill~f!;lii!li;illlll!I~lftliIJlifliJ!j!ilj!IIJi
1'!~~tiJill~'f!f!!lil!ii!~~~~;l3ilt!I~~I;I~'~ill~~]f~!
~8 !!~E:J -.8Z=~~- ~'" .~~ ~~'Ec:~~~ ~ 'ES~~I~~ ~ "'C:~~~~E
c -- _o~ _.-OC e~ ~ C S.s:::ctlm CD _~a.. S~ftI~~
II~f~~I'!II~il~,I~~;~i!~~I~~:)~I~!~llrl~i~I~I~li!~I!1
"'. Z~I~I!~~::-g~~& %"2: 16~i :fK.!!!I~1 ~ .a~.ttls~ ~ 8.m2?~;t~
slit ~=.5~~~-5~==8~",,,, E51 1S..!!!_ z..15;>.~"'~_5.8",g",'5~ '" -812S.8.8;;HIB/TL
cO
o
..,.
~
i
.<:
U
~
-g
'"
E
~
m
........
.
section sha", at the time of making application for such pennit, pay an
annual inspection fee of sixty dollars for the first pool under one ownership
and on the same property, and a fee of thirty dollars for each additional pool
on the same property and under the same ownership. The annual operati ng
pennit shall be effective for a twelve-month period from the date of issuance.
I n a~ case \<l1ere the appl icant has failed for a period of thi rty day s to
file the application and obtain the pennit required by this section, there
shall be added to and collected with the inspection fee a penalty equal to ten
percent of the fee; and for each additional month or fraction of a month after
the expiration of said thirty-day period that the applicant fail s to file such
application and obtai n such pennit, there shall be added to and collected with
the inspection fee an additional penalty equal to ten percent of the
inspection fee; provided, however, that in no event shall the total penalty
added to the i nspecti.on fee pursuant to thi s section be more than sixty
percent of the inspection fee. The imposition or payment of the penalty
imposed by thi s section shall not prevent the imposition of a~ other penalty
prescribed by state law or city ordinance, nor shall it rrevent a criminal
prosecution for violation of this chapter. (Ord. 2001 S 1 part), 1982: Ord.
1700 S 1 (part), 1976.)
I.
15.48.120 Public pool-Renewal of pennit-Penalty for delinquency.
A pennit issued pursuant to thi s chapter shall be renewed annually.
Application for the renewal shall be made to the county health officer. At
the time application is made, there shall be paid to the county health officer
the annual fee prescribed by Section 15.48.110. The annual fee, if unpaid
longer than thirty days after the expiration of the previous pennit, is
delinquent, and thereafter a penalty shall be imposed in the manner prescribed
in Section 15.48.110. (Ord. 1700 S 1 (part), 1976.)
15.48.130 Enforcement of Sections 15.48.110 and 15.48.120.
The county of San Diego, aC,ting through its officers and, employees, shall
enforce the provisions of Seci;.ions 15.48.110 i\!ld 15.48.",20 arc! ':1Irry out such
inspection activities pursuaht to the agreeme:.t: .for pr;~1ic h::iilth services
entered into on December" 7 ,J ,152; provi tied, ~,owever,"~ tt'r,,'! U:r., 'city shall
undertake, appropriate legal. action for a'{".j violation, cf' !;&'ld sections.
(Ol'd. 1700 S 1 (part), 1976.) ,.' .-
"
,,'
.~. j ."
.'
'"
Ct;&.pte.r 15.50 :'"
REIMBURSEMENT REQI!IREMENTS AfjD PROCEDURES
FOR CONSTRUCnONU: PUBLIC lMPRC'iBlENTS
"',~'. .:
I.
Se.:t;ons:'"
15.50.010
15.5(1.020
15, ~\).()30
15.li(l,(J4tJ
15.:;11. ,,!~!;
15.5u,(:j(i
15.50..,70
lS.S0.08!>
Purpose and intent.
Nature of improvements.
Defi IlHfons.
~~ que :.;1; fOi' rei;,;bursement agreement.
Couoc11 ai;':;~(ln on request.
(;o~t.$ \'If fN're'ltion of reimbursament di strict.
\!S'\:\II1;.:'e cf ,::te director of p:l'o11; ';:.Crks.
i;!;;tic:" ~l1d heaT'''! '19 on establi shme;lt of reimbursement di strict.
,,- <3 8 -S-
591
EXHIL-;IT C
15.50.090
15.50.100
15.50.110
Action by city council.
Limitations on reimbursement agreement.
Obligation of developer or subdivider to claim moneys.
........
15.50.010 Purpose and intent.
In the course of development of properties, lItIether through the
subdivi sion process or the development or redevelopment of previously
subdivided properties, it is frequently necessary or desirable to require the
developer to install certain public improvements,lItIich improvements exceed in
size, capacity or number that \Ilhich is normally required to.. benefit the
.development or Which are located off-site of the development and Which benefit
'Property or properties not within the subdivision or development and tohich
improvements are dedicated to the public. It is the purpose of the council to
establish requirements and procedures for reimbursement of either the
developer and/or the city by those property owners Who subsequently benefit by
sai d improvements to. the extent of their benefi t. It is the intent of the
council that all such property owners lItIo subsequently benefit and Who have
made no contribution to the costs of said improvements. either directly or
through any public improvement proceedi ngs for Which assessnents are levied,
shall make such reimbursements. Said requirements may be imposed either prior.
to. concurrent with. or subsequent to the construction of said public
improvements. It is further the intent of the council that this chapter shall
be in addi tion to and supplemental to the reimbursement procedures as set
forth in the State Subdivision Map Act. the Streets and HighNlys Code and
other provi sions of the Municipal Code. (Ord. 1764 S 1 (part). 1977.)
.---.
15.50.020 Nature of improvements.
The State Subdivision Map Act provides in Sections 66485 and 66486 for the
adoption of a local ordinance Which establi shes requirements and procedures
for reimbursement and a requirement for entering into an agreement with the
subdivider to reimburse the subdivider for that portion of the costs of such
improvements equal to the difference beheen the amount it loDuld have cost the
.subdivider to install such improvements to serve the subdivi sion only and the
actual cost of such improvements. Such improvements i ncl ude. but are not
limited #to. streets (access or major thoroughfare), bri dge s. drai nage, lIBter
and sanitary seller facilities. In regard to drainage and sanitary seller
facilitie sin the subdivi sion situation. the city must adopt a plan as
designated in Section 66483 to impose a reasonable charge on property within
the area benefited by such drainage or sanitary seller facilities. In a
nonsubdivision development project. the city may follow the same procedure as
establi shed for reimbursement of subdividers Who have constructed improvements
of the nature set forth herein. In addition. the director of public Wlrk:;
shall define the area of benefit and establish assessnents as provided
herein. (Ord. 1764 S 1 (part), 1977.)
15.50.030 Definitions.
A. "Actual or total estimated cost of public improvements" means the
estimated total of the construction. engi neeri ng. right-of-lIBY and
overhead costs of the. public improvements to be constructed by the~
developer and the costs of the formation of a reimbursement di strict. If
the scope of the project is al tered duri ng construction. the city council
may increase the estimated cost by - not more than fifteen pe!5~nt without
further notice. - .~
t,...IJf .-- '8". If
592
~/-IIE./T c..
'.
B. "Benefited area" means the entire area I'ilich receives a benefit from the
public improvement. The benefited area shall be that area I'ilich, in the
opinion of the legislative body, upon the recorrmendation of the director
of public Wlrks, and after a public hearing, is benefited by the
construction of the public facility.
C. "Developer" means the person I'ilo is responsible for constructi ng the
public improvement and has borne all or a portion of the costs thereof.
D. "Excess costs" means the amount that is the difference beheen the amount
it Wluld have cost the developer to install such improvements to serve his
development only and the total costs of such improvements.
E. "Publ ic improvements. means those improvements as set forth herei nabove
including. but not limited to. streets (access or major thoroughfare).
bridges. drainage. Wlter or sanitary seW!r facilities and any accessory
improvements necessary to the functioning of said public improvements. but
shall not include any public improvements Wlich will benefit only the
development in Wlich they are located or are installed by a public
improvement proceedi ng for Wlich assessments are levied or are authori zed
requi rements for the subdi vi sion of 1 and. Public improvements shall al so
include the cost of acquisition of any necessary land or right-of-WlY for
the construction of the improvement.
F. "Reimbursement district" means the benefited area within I'ilich either
developed or undeveloped property shall be made subject to a reimbursement
charge or assessment for the purpose of reimbursing the developer for the
excess costs of the public improvement.
(Ord. 1764 S 1 (part). 1977.)
.
15.50.040 Request for reimbursement agreement.
Whenever a developer WlO is required to install or replace such public
improvements or Wlenever the city may have participated in the costs of such
improvements I'ilich either the developer or the city feels will be of benefit
to property other than hi sown. I'ilich properties are not subject to an
assessment for such costs under a public improvement proceedi ng. the developer
or the city may request that the city council form a reimbursement di strict.
The request shall be in writing and filed with ~he city clerk \\tIo shall place
it on the agenda of the next regular meeting of the city council. (Ord. 1764
S 1 ( pa rt). 1 977. )
15.50.050 Council action on request.
The city council shall consider the developer's request and. in its sole
di scretion. may di rect the city manager to begi n the proceedi ngs for the
formation of a reimbursement di strict. . Such di rection to the city manager
'Shall be conditioned upon the developer-applicant depositing with the finance
department a sum of money sufficient to cover the city's' costs in the
formation of the reimbursement district., (Ord. 1764 S, (part). 1977.)
'.
15.50.060 Costs of formation of reimbursement di strict.
A. The co sts of the formation of the reimbursement di strict" shall i ncl ude as
estimated by the director of public Wlrks:
1. The costs'of all notices published or mailed pursuant to this policy;
2. The cost to the city of the director of public Wlrks. preparation of
the estimated costs of the facilities. determination of the benefited
area and estimate of the proper assessment.
'-.-/r ~
593
EXI-/I BIT c.
B. The developer shall deposit the sum of -one 1:housand dollars to reimburse
the city for its administrative costs in conducting the initial """".
proceedings for the formation of the district. The developer shall be
required, hO\tever, to pay the actual admini strative costs for the
formation of thedi strict. I n the event a reimbursement di strict is not
formed, the actual costs shall be nonrefundable, but should they be less
than the depo'sit, the balance shall be refunded. In the event a di strict
is formed, the costs shall be considered an incidental cost of the
improvements to be recouped by the terms of the reimbursement agreement.
(Ord. 1764 5 1 (part), 1977.)
15.50.070 Estimate of the director of public torts.
Upon receipt of the deposit by the director of finance, the director of
public w:>rks shall prepare and file:
A. A map describing the benefited area I<ilich identifies all parcels within
. the area;
B. The total cost of the facilities including incidental expenses;
C. An estimate of the excess costs;
D. An estimate of the assessment and spread thereof necessary to equitably
pay the excess costs.
In those situations I<ilere an excessive amount of time and labor \\Ould be
involved in the preparation of such documents and estimates, the director of
public \\Orks may request that special engineering services be retained to
expedite and facilitate the preparation of the documents and estimates. The
cost of any such engineering service shall be paid by the developer. The
developer seeki ng a reimbursement agreement, pursuant to the pro vi sions of """"
this chapter, must prove to the sati sfaction of the director of public \\Orks
that the costs reflect a balanced and fair sum either through a unit cost
breakdoWl or presentation of proof of formal bidding. The director of. public
\\Orks may in any case require that the developer submit his project for bids.
(Ord. 1764 5 1 (part), 1977.)
15.50.080 Notice and heari ng on establi shment of reimbursement di strict.
Upon receiving the director of public \\Orks' estimates, the city clerk
shall set a hearing before the city council and:
A. The city clerk shall cause a notice of the hearing, in substantially the
following form, to be publi shed once in a newspaper of general circulation
in the city at least ten days prior to such hearing:
"NOTICE OF HEARING
"The City Council of the City of Chula Vista will hold a public
hearing at ........... on .......... at the City Council Chambers at City
Hall located at 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California, to consider
the establi shment of a reimbursement district for the financing of certain
.. . . . . . .. . . . .. .... wi th1 n the. C1 ty.
"All property within the described area may be subject to a fee to pay
. the cost of providing 'such facilities, to-wit: That property more
particularly described by plat on file in the office of the Director of
Public Works. . .-.,
fp,,/b -g'/6
594
.
EXfll B IT(
':.
"All persons desiring to testify with respect to: the necessity of
said public improvements, the cost of said public improvements, the
benefited area or, the amount of the excess costs, may appear and be heard
at sai d heari ng." ,
B. The city clerk shall, at least ten days prior to the hearing, al so cause a
copy of the above notice to be mailed to each o~r of real property
within the benefited area as sho""" on the last equalized assessment rolL "-
. Such noti ce . shall be accompani ed by a map of the propo sed benefi ted area
and a statement by the director of public w:lrks describing:
1. The estimated cost of the public improvements; and
2. The estimated or actual excess costs necessary to pay for the public
improvements; and
3. The estimated or actual costs Wlich will be assessed against the
property Wlen the property is developed and makes use of the public
improvements.
(Ord. 1764 S 1 (part), 1977.)
.
15.50.090 Action by city council.
After the public hearing, the city council may, in its sole di scretion,
direct that a reimbursement agreement with the developer and/or the city be
prepared containing such provi sions as the council deems to be necessary,
desirable and equitable. The provisions may include the following conditions:
A. Collection from other persons including public agencies using such
improvements for the benefit of real property not wlthi n the subdivi sion
or development area of a reasonable charge for such use;.
B. . A requirement for a contribution to the developer and/or the city for that
part of the cost of the improvements that benefit real property outside of
the development area or the subdi vi sion and levy a charge upon such real
property sO benefited as a reimbursement for such costs plus simple
interest thereon at seven percent per year to be paid to the developer
and/or the city; .
C. Establish and maintain reimbursement districts for the levy and collection
of such charge or costs from the property benefited.
Once the allocation of the cost has been approved by a resolution of the
council of the city, it shall constitute a statement of charges due from the
o\loners and their successors, heirs or assigns of the various parcel s of
property as their share of the public improvements. The director of public
wOrks shall respread the assessment after final costs have been calculated and
shall cause the resolution to be appropriately modified prior to its
recordation. .
The city clerk shall record a copy of the council resolution with the
county recorder. The resolution shall include the O\lonership of record, the
legal description, and the amount of charges for each lot or parcel within the
di stri ct.
The reimbursement shall be collectable by the city at either the time the
property is to be subdivided or upon a request for a building permit for
development of the property. (Ord. 1764 S 1 (part), 1977.)
Ie
15.50.100 Limitations on reimbursement agreement.
. The reimbursement agreement shall be subject to an annual seven percent
interest charge as provided in Section 15.50.090, six percent of Wlich shall
be payable to the person WlO is entitled 'to reimbursement during the term of
b-/7 ~'7 .
594 V' . r-r-
EXHIBITC
.
t
the agreement, and one percent shall be payable to the city during the" term of
the contract and placed by the city in its general fund to cover the ~
administrative costs of the city in its expense in handling the collection of
such funds. At the conclusion of the term of the. reimbursement agreement, the
total annual seven percent interest charge shall be payable to the city. The
term of a~ reimbursement agreement shall be established by the city council
based upon the reasonable expectations of the development of benefited
properties or the utilization of the public improvement by such benefited
properties; provi ded, hOlEver, that the maximum tenn of any reimbursement
agreement shall be for a period of tlEnty years. After termination of the
term establi shed by said agreement, the same reimbursement charges shall be
imposed, but the funds collected therefrom will not be paid to the developer
or its successors in interest, but shall be deposited in the general fund of
the city.
If, during a tlEnty-year period following the formation of the district,
a~ person either files a tentative map or a tentative parcel map or applies
for a building permit on a lot for Wlich a charge for public improvements has
been established in accordance with this chapter, and such person or his
predecessor in interest has not paid such charges to the city, the establi shed
charge shall be paid prior to the filing of the final map or parcel map, or
the issuance of the building permit; provided, hOlEver, such payment shall not
be required in connection with building permits having a total improvement
value of ten thousand dollars or less; provided, hOlEver. that improvements
Wlich are a modification or addition to si ngle-family structures shall not be
subject to an assessment under a reimbursement agreement; and provided
further. that the money paid shall include the principal charge plus interest
in the amount of seven percent from the date. of est;abli shment of the charge..........
(Ord. 1764 S 1 (part). 1977.)
15.50.110 Obligation of developer or subdivider to claim moneys.
All moneys collected under the provi sions of thi s chapter shall be
deposited by the director of finance of the city into a public improvement
reimbursement trust fund or a subdivi sion map act reimbursement trust fund.
The director of finance shall refund to the person or persons WlO paid for the
improvements for Wlich the charges IEre collected. or to their assignees, all
moneys so collected; except. hOlEver, that one percent per year of all such
moneys collected shall be retained by the city to defray the expenses incurred
in administering the trust fund.
The city shall notify the developer or subdivider of the existence of
moneys deposited in said fund. The notice shall be made to the address
contai ned in the reimbursement agreement and no further inquiries shall be
required by the city. If any such money remains on deposit with the city
without being claimed by the party rightfully entitled to it within one year
after notice has been made as provided herein. such money shall be forfeited
to the city. and then it shall be transferred to the general fund of the
city. (Ord. 1764 S 1 (part). 1977.)
"""""
~/II 8' .~...
59S- I
EXHIBITC
.
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
For meeting
Item No.=!'S 12
9/20/i7
of 91~f;i'
eM TlTLE Ordinance 17511 - Relating to ~rements ~ PrCJoedu:'es for ReiJtbursement of
Persons Constructing Public IIr.proverrents Benefiting P:&.~ties other than those
()..med by the Developer or Constructed at the Expense of the City Conferring
similar Benefits .
B~lInED BY SECOXD READING A:\iJ ~\i.)vt'.IION
City Attorney
.EM EXPLANATION
(4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED YES____ HO..!..>
or many months. the staff has been working on a procedure for the
stablishment of reimbursement districts. Said reiYW'lrsement districts
'ould enable developers who install public irnprovemlmts benefiting pro-
,erties other than their own to recover a fair and J:easonable amount of
,oney from the benefited properties. The procedure would be in addition
.0 or supplemental to currently available assessment: district procedures.
t would be applicable to improvements which have already been constructed,
Jut which other property owners would desire to utilize for the benefit
Jf their proposed development.
al an ordinance has now been prepared and is ready for action by the
~ Council. .
Resolution.__
EXHIBITS
Ordinance X
----
-
Agreement_
Plat____ Notification List____
I)t.npr
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Attached___ Submitted on
.
~ If ~i"'"
~..If
E:XtlIBIT L
~
TInS PAGE BLANK
""'"\
~
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Reso 1 ut i on lID C; t<f Accept i ng
for the purchase of trucks
Director of Finance;;t~
City Managerp
Itl!ll 7
Meeting Date 5/5/92
bids and awarding contract
(4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-I-)
Council Referral No. ~
Bids were received and opened at 10:00 a.m. on March 30, 1992, in the Office
of the Purchasing Agent for the purchase of the below listed vehicles:
Item
lli
1
1
2
1
3
1
RECOMMENDATION :
Descriotion
Division
Cab & chassis with compressor mounted
on flatbed
Streets
Cab & chassis with cut-away cab and
utility service van
Const. & Repair
Cab & chassis with service body and
compressor
Traffic Signal
Item 1 - That Council award bid to El Cajon Ford.
Item 2 & 3 - That Council award bids to Drew Ford.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
At the April 21, 1992 meeting, reviewed this item and referred it back to
staff for further information regarding color of Public Works vehicles and
consideration of the trade-in allowance to determine if a bid by Fuller Ford
could be considered a low bid.
The City's bid specifications that were distributed to the auto dealers
clearly required that bids include the vehicles being painted with Dupont
7744A lime yellow acrylic enamel. This is the same color and coating that has
been requ i red for Pub 1 i c Works' veh i c 1 es for several years. The reason th is
color is used is that a national study found it to be the most visible and
therefore the safest for public vehicles. Public Works trucks are frequently
used in the streets at work sites. Visibility to passing motorists is vital
to the safety of the workers and the public. Staff's recommendation is that
this color continue to be used.
All bids submitted, except for Fuller Ford, included the specified color.
Subsequent to the Council meeting, staff contacted Fuller Ford and were
informed that they would charge $645 to paint item 1 (cab and chassis with
compressor mounted on flatbed) and $475 to paint item 3 (cab and chassis with
service body and compressor) the required color.
I~\
Page 2, Item ~
Meeting Date 5/5/92
For item I, if the cost of painting ($645) is added to Fuller Ford's base bid
($23,825) and they are given credit for the 1% sales tax amount ($244.70)
returned to the City, their adjusted base bid is $24,225.30 which is $660.30
higher than El Cajon Ford base bid of $23,565, regardless of the trade-in
allowance.
For item 3, if the cost of painting ($475) is added to Fuller Ford's base bid
($20,748) and they are given credit for the 1% sales tax amount ($212.23)
returned to the City, their adjusted base bid is $21,010.77 which is $409.20
higher than the Drew Ford base bid of $20,601.57.
Based on the above analys is, staff are recommendi ng that El Cajon Ford be
awarded the bid for item 1 and Drew Ford for items 2 and 3.
Item 1 - Cab & chassis with comoressor mounted on flatbed
Trade- In
Bidder Un it Pri ce Sales Tax All owance Amount
El Cajon Ford $23,565.00 $1,826.29 $-700.00 $24,691.29
El Cajon
Full er Ford 23,825.00 1,846.44 -301.00 25,370.44
Chula Vista
Drew Ford 25,869.57 2,004.89 -800.00 27,074.46
La Mesa
Downey Auto Center 27,237.00 2,110.87 -1,200.00 28,147.87
Downey
The low bid of El Cajon Ford meets specifications and is acceptable. The
vehicle being replaced is a 1967 Ford with compressor mounted on a flatbed.
the trade-in allowance is comparable to what the vehicle would probably bring
in at auction. To save staff time, the vehicle will be traded in to the
successful bidder. The bid of Fuller Ford didn't include painting of vehicle
to specified color.
Item 2 - Cab & Chassis with cut-awav cab and utilitv service van
Bidder
Unit Price
Sales Tax
Amount
Drew Ford - La Mesa
Fuller Ford - Chula Vista
$18,670.30
22,847.00
$1,446.95
1,770.64
$20,117.25
24,617 . 64
The low bid of Drew Ford meets specifications and is acceptable.
,,2.
Page 3, Itell {
Meeting Date 5/5/92
Item 3 - Cab & Chassis with service bodv and comDressor
Bidder
Drew Ford - La Mesa
Fuller Ford - Chula Vista
El Cajon Ford - El Cajon
Downey Auto Center - Downey
Unit Price
Sales Tax
Amount
$20,601. 57
20,748.00
22,238.00
25,486.00
$I ,596. 52
1,607.97
1,723.45
1,975.17
$22,198.19
22,355.97
23,961.45
27,461.17
The low bid of Drew Ford meets specifications and is acceptable. The bid of
Fuller Ford did not meet bid specifications in that it did not include
painting of vehicle to specified color.
FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds are provided for in FY 91-92 equipment
rep 1 acement budget for the purchase items number 1 and 2. Suffi c i ent funds
for item number 3 are provided in the FY 91-92 General Fund budget.
WPC 0309U
{-3/7-tf
RESOLUTION NO. J lD SSt./J
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF TRUCKS
WHEREAS, bids were received and opened at 10:00 a.m. on March
30, 1992 in the Office of the Purchasing Agent for the purchase of
one the below listed vehicles:
Item Qty Description
1 1 Cab & Chassis with compressor
mounted on flatbed
2 1 Cab & chassis with cut-away cab
and utility service van
3 1 Cab & chassis with service body
and compressor
Division
Streets
Const. &
Repair
Traf. Signal
Item 1 - Cab & Chassis with Compressor Mounted on Flatbed
Trade-In
~ Unit Price Sales Tax Allowance Amount
E1 Cajon Ford $23,565.00 $1,826.29 $ 700.00 $24,691.29
E1 Cajon
Fuller Ford $23,825.00 $1,846.44 $ 301.00 $25,370.44
Chula Vista
Drew Ford $25,869.57 $2,004.89 $ 800.00 $27,074.46
La Mesa
Downey Auto Center $27,237.00 $2,110.87 $1,200.00 $28,147.87
Downey
WHEREAS, the low bid of El Cajon Ford meets specifications and
is acceptable to staff who recommends awarding the contract to E1
Cajon Ford who can produce an acceptable performance bond; and
Item 2 - Cab & Chassis with cut-awav cab and utilitv service van
Bidder unit Price Sales Tax Amount
Drew Ford $18,670.30 $ 1,446.95 $20,117.25
La Mesa
Fuller Ford $22,847.00 $1,770.64 $24,617.64
Chula vista
1
I ... $""'
WHEREAS, the low bid of Drew Ford meets specifications and is
acceptable.
Item 3 - Cab & Chassis with service bodv and compressor
Bidder unit Price Sales Tax Amount
Drew Ford $20,601.57 $1,596.52 $22,198.19
La Mesa
Fuller Ford $20,748.00 $1,607.97 $23,961. 45
Chula vista
El Cajon Ford $22,238.00 $1,723.45 $23,961.45
El Cajon
Downey Auto $25,486.00 $1,975.17 $27,461.17
Center
Downey
WHEREAS, the low bid of Drew Ford meets specifications and is
acceptable.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
city of Chula vista does hereby accept said three bids and does
hereby award the contract for Item 1 to EL Cajon Ford in the amount
of $24,691.29 and for Items 2 and 3 to Drew Ford in the amount of
$20,117.25 and $22,198.19 respectively.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula
vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract
for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
Lyman Christopher, Director
of Finance
ovod X
Cl.ty
Presented by
Bruce M.
Attorney
C:\f1I\tlUcks
2
7~(,
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item q
Meeting Date 5/5/92
ITEM TITLE: Resolution 16bb~ Approving Contract Extension for Planning Services
on the EastLake/Kaiser Project
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ~{
REVIEWED BY: City Manager! (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No..xJ
In June of 1991, the City Council approved a contract with Bud Gray to serve as project
manager for the Kaiser Hospital/EastLake Village Center project and to conduct the analysis and
evaluation work related to the Planning Department's review of the application, as well as other
EastLake projects. The contract needs to be extended in order to complete the work underway.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the attached resolution approving an amendment
and extension of the existing agreement with Bud Gray and Associates, and authorize the Mayor
to execute the contract on behalf of the City Council.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The review of the Kaiser Hospital/EastLake Village Center project, which the City is currently
conducting, has proven to be more complex and more time consuming than originally anticipated
by City staff and the applicant. Specifically, in order to provide for concurrent processing of
all major discretionary planning approvals for this project, the scope of project review was
expanded from the original list of actions to include a supplemental Environmental Impact
Report, General Development Plan Amendment, Public Facilities Financing Plan, Sectional
Planning Area Plan Amendment, Planned Community District Regulation amendment,
Conditional Use Permit, precise Plan, Activity Center Precise Plan Guidelines, Water
Conservation Plan, an Air Quality Improvement Plan, and Development Agreement. We are
continuing to give top priority to the KaiserlVillage Center project due to the critical time
situation involved. The design work is evolving as the planning evaluation continues. Weekly
problem solving sessions with a number of different departments are continuing to bring the
complete proposal to the City Council by June 30.
The contract planner is also assisting the Planning Department on other EastLake projects.
These projects include the proposed community shopping center south of Otay Lakes Road
within EastLake Greens. This project has completed the design phase and was recently approved
by the Design Review Committee. Mr. Gray also coordinated review of the density transfer
~-\
Page 2, Item "
Meeting Date 5/5/92
project within EastLake Greens which involves the transfer of 69 dwelling units which has been
approved by the Planning Commission and will be before the City Council on May 19.
Primarily due to the expanded scope of review which has been required in order to consider all
discretionary approvals for the Kaiser project concurrently, the original contract amount of
$60,000 will be exceeded, and the contract limit needs to be amended in order for the Kaiser
project to proceed on schedule.
Both the EastLake Development Company and the Kaiser Permanente organization concur with
the Department's recommendation and will guarantee payment of the full cost incurred by the
agreement pursuant to the amended contract. The rate of compensation is unchanged form the
original agreement ($100 per hour).
Mr. Gray has 27 years experience in the planning profession, including 11 years working on
projects in Chula Vista. Chula Vista projects include EastLake I, IT, III and the Olympic
Training Center, as well as the General Plan and Growth Management Program. He is very
knowledgeable concerning the original EastLake Master Plan as well as each of the individual
phases of the project.
The proposed amendment to the agreement would authorize a not-to-exceed amount of
compensation of $35,000. The not-to-exceed amount is based on an estimate of time needed to
complete the processing of the Kaiser Hospital project through June 30. It should be noted that
Mr. Gray's work on other projects during FY 1991-92 (Otay Ranch backfill position, San
Miguel Ranch review, and EastLake/Kaiser current contract) will result in total compensation
of $145,225, not including the proposed contract amendment. Contracts for these other projects
have since expired.
It should also be noted that the City Council previously authorized the hiring of Marilyn
Ponseggi as a contract environmental review coordinator for this project. At that time, staff
indicated that in the FY 1993 budget, we will be recommending permanent staffing to meet long-
term needs for processing environmental reviews for these types of projects. The same point
needs to be emphasized with regard to the continued use of a contract planner on this project.
This request relates only to this specific project, and only through the current fiscal year; long-
term staffing needs for this type of project review are being addressed in the FY 1993 budget.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of this contract amendment (an amount not to exceed $35,000)
will be paid to the City by the applicant through a deposit account. In addition, the City will
receive a 7 % administrative fee to cover administrative costs.
(BOoooext.al13)
~..~
RESOLUTION NO. llol..b,\
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA RATIFYING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT EXTENDING THE CONTRACT WITH BUD GRAY
FOR CONTRACT PLANNING SERVICES FOR EASTLAKE AND
KAISER HOSPITAL PROJECTS
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista contracted with Mr. Bud Gray to
provide contract pl anni ng servi ces to the Planning Department on June IS,
1991; and
WHEREAS, the agreement contained a not-to-exceed amount of
compensation which has been reached due to an expanded scope of project review
and accelerated schedule of work requested by the applicant; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to continue Mr. Gray's services to meet
targeted public hearing schedules established by the City; and
WHEREAS, the current schedule of activities will require an extension
of the original term of the agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chul a Vi sta does hereby approve the Fi rst Amendment to the Agreement between
the City of Chula Vista and Bud Gray and Associates for professional planning
services as a contract planner, known as document number C091-105, a copy of
which is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is
hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for and on behalf of
the City.
Presented by
"1"
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
WPC 0274p
<i- ~ I B-tI
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH BUD GRAY AND
ASSOCIATES FOR CONTRACT PLANNER SERVICES
Thi s Fi rst Amendment to Agreement is entered into thi s 5th day of
May, 1992, between the City of Chula Vista, a municipal corporation ("City"),
Bud Gray and Associates, a professional planning firm ("Consultant"), and the
Eastlake Development Company ("Applicant").
RI~IIA.L.s.
WHEREAS, Consultant, City and Appl icant previously entered into an
agreement on June 18, 1991 by Resolution No. 16210 whereby Consultant performs
professional planning services for City; and
WHEREAS, City continues to require professional planning services to
perform the critical review and planning analysis of various Eastlake
projects, including the Kaiser Hospital proposal; and
WHEREAS, the agreement contains a not-to-exceed amount that has been
reached ($60,000); and
WHEREAS, Consultant warrants and represents that they are
experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can prepare and
deliver the services required of Consultant to City within the time frames
herein provided all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this First
Amendment to Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the
covenants and conditions set forth in this First Amendment to Agreement, the
parties agree that the existing agreement is amended as follows:
1. The rec i ta 1 s set forth above are hereby incorporated into the
agreement.
2. Paragraph 2 is amended to read: The Consultant shall commence
the provision of Services effective when last signed by all
parties hereto, and unless otherwise sooner terminated by the
terms of this agreement, shall remain obligated to provide said
Services until September 1, 1992.
3. Paragraph 6(b) is hereby amended to read: "The compensation to
be paid by City to Consultant for Services shall be on a time
and materials basis at the hourly billing rate of $100 per hour
for each hour of productive work performed; however, Consultant
agrees to perform all of the Services and del iver all of the
Work Product herein required, and in the manner of the detailed
scope of work set forth in the attached Exhibit A, for
not-to-exceed NINETY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($95,000), THIRTY
FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($35,000) of which shall be the maximum
compensation under this Agreement."
4. All other terms and conditions not amended by this First
Amendment to Agreement remain in full force and effect.
[Next Page is Signature Page]
~-5
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AGREEMENT WITH BUD GRAY AND ASSOCIATES FOR
CONTRACT PLANNING SERVICES WITH REGARD TO
EAST LAKE PROJECTS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ci ty, Appl icant and Consultant have executed
this First Amendment for Agreement for Planning Services this 5th day of
May, 1992.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
BUD GRAY & ASSOCIATES
BY:
Tim Nader, Mayor
City of Chula Vista
BY:
Bud Gray, President
Bud Gray and Associates
ATTEST:
EAST LAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
BY:
Beverly Authelet
City Clerk
BY:
Kent Aden, Vice President
of Community Development
BY:
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
~
BY:
WPC 0273p
C6 - .~;
,)
y
,
1
"
AGREEMENT WITH
BUD GRAY AND ASSOCIATES
FOR CONTRACT PLANNING SERVICES
WITH REGARD TO THE
EASTlAKE I VILLAGE CENTER
AND EASTlAKE GREENS PROJECTS
This Agreement is made this 18th day of June 1991, for the purposes
of reference only, and effective as of the date last executed between the
parties, between the City of Chula Vista ("City") herein, a municipal
corporation of the State of California, Bud Gray, an individual doing business
as Bud Gray and Associates, a professional planning consulting ("Consultant");
and the EastLake Development Company, ("Applicant"), a California Limited
Partnership, (an applicant for various discretionary approvals in conjunction
with the Eastlake I Village Center and Eastlake Greens Projects) and is made
with reference to the following facts:
RECITALS
Whereas, the property which is the subject of this Consul tant' s
analysis as required in this Agreement is a 91.4! acre parcel generally
located northerly of Otay Lakes Road, westerly of the upper Otay Reservoir,
within the EastLake I Village Center and four parcels containing 27.4 acres
located wi th i n the EastLake Greens project as shown on the map attached and
hereto as Exhibit A ("Subject Site"); and,
Whereas, Applicant has made applications ("Applications") to City
for various pl anning and development approval s necessary to develop the 91. 4
acre site with a 32 acre Kaiser Hospital complex; a community shopping center;
and the 27.4 acre parcels with an additional 152 dwelling units; ("Project");
and,
Whereas, it is appropri ate that the App 1 i cant bears the cost of
consultant's services;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City, Consultant, and
Applicant do hereby mutually agree as follows:
I. Consultant's Duties
a. General Duties
The Consultant's obligation is to provide any and all
project management and planning consultant services as same may be requested
of Consultant by the City, by and through its City Manager, or his designee
relative to the Project.
b. Scope of Work Duties
The Consultant's duties include but are not limited to
providing those services set forth in the Scope of Work, attached hereto as
Exhibit A and to prepare any related documents for use by the City in
connection with' their study ("Work Product"). In the process of providing
Services, Consultant shall help to coordinate and expedite, subject to the
~-1
1Z162 fO
c.d\1-\
I
\
.'
concurrence of the City's Representative, the various departments of the City
and other governmental agencies as may be necessary in order to accomplish the
required review of Applications in an expeditious manner avoiding unnecessary
delays and duplications of work.
c. Standard of Care
Consultant in performing any services under this
Agreement, whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall be performed
in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised
by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and
in similar locations.
d. Additional Special Assignments.
In addition to the foregoing obligations of Consultant,
Consultant shall negotiate, subject to the review and approval of City's
Representat he, wi th Appl icant a schedul e for the preparation and processi ng
of Applications, setting forth therein expected hearing dates.
e. Insurance
Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and
consultants employed by it are protected by worker's compensat ion insurance
and the Consultant has the coverage under public liability and property damage
insurance policies which this Agreement requires to be demonstrated in the
form of a Certificate of Insurance.
Consultant will provide, prior to the commencement of the
services required under this agreement the following Certificates of Insurance
to the City prior to beginning work:
Statutory Worker's Compensation coverage plus $1,000,000
Employees liability coverage.
General and Automobile Liability coverage to $1,000,000
combined single limit which names City as an additional insured, and which is
primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("primary coverage"),
and which treats the employees of the City in the same manner as members of
the general public ("cross-liability coverage").
All policies shall be issued by a carrier that has a
Best's Rating of "A, Class V", or better, or shall meet the approval of the
City's Risk Manager.
All policies shall provide that same may not be cancelled
without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the City.
All of the obligations of Consultant herein in this Section 1
contained shall be referred to as "Services".
-2-
~-<6
2. Term.
The Consultant shall commence the provision of Services
effective when last signed by all parties hereto, and unless otherwise sooner
terminated by the terms of this agreement, shall remain obligated to provide
said Services until July I, 1992, or when the amount of the Required Deposit
is exhausted, whichever is later ("Term").
3. City's Representative for Administration of Agreement.
In the absence of further designation, the Director of Planning
is hereby designated as the City Manager's designee (City's Representative").
4.
Reporting Responsibility of Consultant.
Consultant shall work for, be responsible to, and report solely
by and through City's Representative. Consultant does not work
responsible to, and shall not be required to report to, the
to the City,
for, is not
Applicant.
Applicant's Duty and Responsibility.
a. Duty to Pay for Consultant.
Applicant shall be solely responsible to City for all of
the costs of Consultant which City is or may become obligated to pay to
Consultant by the terms of this Agreement as same may be, from time-to-time
amended, and Applicant shall promptly pay same plus 7% of same to City at or
prior to the time City is obligated to pay some to Consultant.
5.
In regard to that duty, and as a mechanism for
implementing same, Applicant shall periodically deposit with City a sum
determined by the Director of Planning; and hereby authorizes City to draw
upon said deposit in order to meet Applicant's payment obligations under this
agreement.
b. In addition to any other remedies which City may have for
breach of this Agreement, breach of this Agreement, breach of this Agreement
by Applicant in any manner, including but not limited to the failure of
App 11 cant for any reason to depos i t funds on demand shall be grounds for the
refusal of City and/or Consultant, and City and/or Consultant is hereby
authorized to refuse, to continue processing the EastLake I Village Center and
EastLake Greens projects.
c. Duty of Cooperation.
In addition to the aforementioned duties, Appl icant shall
provide project information as may be otherwise required by Consultant to
fully and adequately provide the Services.
-3-
~-"
!
"
6. Duties of the City:
a. Consultation and Cooperation.
Ci ty shall regul arly confer with the Consul tant for the
purpose of reviewing the progress of the delivery of Services and to provide
direction and guidance to the Consultant.
b. Compensation.
The compensation to be paid by City to Consultant for
Services shall be on a time and materials basis at the hourly billing rate of
$100 per hour for each productive hour worked; however, Consultant agrees to
perform all of the Services and deliver all of the Work Product herein
required, and in the manner of the detailed scope of work set forth in the
attached Exhibit A, for not-to-exceed SIXTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($60,000).
c. Compensation for Consultant Services shall be paid on
monthly basis 30 days after receipt of Consultant's due and proper billing.
d. City may from time to time reduce the Scope of Work by the
Consultant to be performed under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree to
meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding
reduction in the Maximum Fee associated with said reduction.
I
7. Financial Interest of Consultant:
Consultant warrants and represents that neither he, nor hi s
immediate family members, nor his employees or agents ("Consultant
Associates") presently have any interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever
in Applicant, or any partner or partnership of Appl icant, or shareholder of
Applicant, or in any person, firm or entity doing business with Applicant, or
with any partner or partnership of Applicant, or in the property which is the
subject matter of the Project, or in any property within ten (10) radial miles
from the exterior boundaries of the property which is the subject matter of
the Project, or ("Prohibited Interest"), except as noted in Exhibit B.
Consultant further warrants and represents that neither
Consultant nor Consultant Associates are or have been, employed by Applicant,
and that no promise of future employment, remuneration, consideration,
gratuity or other award or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant
Associates. Consultant promises to advise City of any such promise that may
be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter.
Consultant agrees that neither Consultant nor his immediate
family members, nor his employees or agents, shall acquire any such Prohibited
Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months after the
expiration of this Agreement.
-4-
~.../t)
.
Consultant may not conduct or sol icit any business for any
party to this Agreement, or for any third party which may be in conflict with
Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement.
8. Hold Harmless
Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City,
its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims
for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation
attorneys' fees) arising out of the conduct of the Consultant, or any agency
or employees, subcontractors, or others in connect i on wi th the execut i on of
the work covered by this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from
the sole negl igence or sole .willful conduct of the City, its officers, or
employees. Consultant's indemnification shall include any and all costs,
expenses, attorneys' fees and liability incurred by the City, its officers,
agents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether the same
proceed to judgement or not. Further, Consultant at its own expense shall,
upon written request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought
against the City, its officers, agents or employees. Consultant's
indemnification of City shall not be 1 imited by any prior or subsequent
declaration by Consultant.
9. Termination of Agreement for Cause:
If, through any cause within Consultant's control, Consultant
shall fail to fulfill in a timely manner and proper manner its obligations
under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants,
agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such
termi nat i on and spec i fyi ng the effect i ve date thereof at 1 east five (5) days
before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or
unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and
other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City,
become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive
just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such
documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of
Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, less any damages to
which the City may have been put by the breach, default or violation of
Consultant.
10. Termination of Agreement of Convenience of City:
City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any
reason for giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination
and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before
the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and
unfinished documents and other materials described in hereinabove shall, at
the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property. If the
Agreement is terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant
shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any
satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials to the
-5-
<;-. \J
,
effective date of such termination. Consultant hereby expressly waives any
, and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except
as set forth herein.
11. Termination of Agreement for Withdrawal of Project:
Applicant shall have the right to terminate this Agreement for
withdrawal of Applications, by giving written notice to Consultant and City of
such termination and specifying the effective date hereof at least thirty (30)
days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all
finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, and surveys, drawings, maps,
reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the
City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to
receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed
on such documents and other material s up to the effect ive date of Notice of
Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder.
12. Assignability:
The services of Consultant are personal to the City and
Applicant, and Consultant shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and
shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or
novation), without prior written consent of City and Applicant except as
outlined in the attached scope of work.
13. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material:
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms,
design, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties
produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of
City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this
Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by
Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express
consent of City. City shall have the unrestricted authority to publish,
disclose as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act,
distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any
such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or
properties produced under this Agreement. City shall provide a copy of all
such documents herein referenced to the Applicant.
14. Independent Contractor:
City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant
shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and
means of performing the services required under this Agreement. City
maintains the right only to reject or accept Consultant's work Products.
Consul tant and any of the Consul tant' s agents, employees or representat i ves
are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and
shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be
entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but
not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, workers compensation benefits,
injury leave or other leave benefits.
-6-
<E; - \"]...
.
I
15. Responsible Charge:
Consultant shall assign a project manager to project for the
duration of the project. No substitution for this position shall be allowed
without written approval from the City. The project manager for this project
shall be Bud Gray.
16. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this
agreement, against the City unless a claim has first been presented in writing
and filed with the City of Chula Vista and acted upon by the City of Chula
Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions
of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and
such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same.
Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good
faith with city for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of
this Agreement.
17. Attorney's Fees:
Should that dispute result in litigation, it is agreed that the
prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in
the defense of the claim, including costs and attorney's fees.
18. Statement of Costs:
In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or
participates in the preparation of report or document as a result of the
scope-of-work required by Consultant, Consultant shall include, or cause the
inclusion, in said report or document a statement of the numbers and cost in
dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation
of the report or document.
WPC 9410P
-7-
~~\,?>
r
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AGREEMENT WITH BUD GRAY AND ASSOCIATES
FOR PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES
WITH REGARD TO THE
EASTLAKE I VILLAGE CENTER PROJECT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City, Applicant, and Consultant have executed
this Contract for Planning Services Agreement this 18th day of June 1991.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
BY: ~- ~
Tim Nader, Mayor
City of Chula Vista
BUD GRAY & ASSOCIATES
BY:
BY:
ATTEST:
BY:
Beverly A thelet
City Cler
K ce President
of Community Development
:~
Exhibit A: Detailed Scope of Work
Exhibit B: Disclosure
WPC 9410P
-8-
~..I~
.
EXHIBIT A
A. SCOPE OF WORK
Critical review, evaluation, analysis, and report with respect to the
Applicant's request including, but not limited to the following:
1. EastLake I Village Center Project:
a. Review and report on prior City Council actions regarding
EastLake I GDP/SPA Plan, Public Facilities Financing Plan,
Planned Community District Regulations and Design Guidelines
for the Village Center.
b. Review and report on Growth Management Program and
Implementation Ordinance requirements.
c. Review and report on approved tentative subdivision map
conditions applied to EastLake I and EastLake Greens with
respect to the Village Center.
d. Reviews, evaluation, staff reports, and project management as
may be requested by the Director of Planning which the City
must carry out in order to approve, deny or conditionally
approve App 1 i cant's app 1 i cat i on for a GDP /SPA Pl an Amendment,
Public Facilities Financing Plan Amendment, Precise Plan,
Conditional Use Permit, Supplemental EIR, Growth Management
Compliance, and other entitlements.
2. EastLake Greens Supplemental Density Project:
a. Review and report on prior City Council actions regarding
EastLake II General Development Plan, and EastLake Greens SPA
Plan, Planned Community District Regulations and Design
Guidelines.
b. Review and report on EastLake Greens Public Facilities Finance
Plan and Development Agreement.
c. Review and report on approved tentative subdivision map
conditions appl ied to EastLake Greens with respect to subject
four parcels.
d. Reviews, evaluation, and staff reports as may be requested by
the Director of Planning which the City must consider in order
to approve, deny, or conditionally approve Applicant's
application for an EastLake II General Development Plan
Amendment, EastLake Greens, SPA Plan Amendment, Planned
Community District Regulations Amendment and other entitlements.
Consultant shall perform the scope of work described hereinabove and in
doing so shall review, analyze, critique, and make recommendations
regarding the various discretionary approvals to the Director of
Planning, or his designee, sought by the Applicant.
WPC 9410P
-9-
~ . r.s,-
r
EXHIBIT A
General
Development
Plan
~ i
~ 'I
1-<1/ L..-............,
....,....
RESIDENTIAL
....." USE .......
MHS a.v '0 IHTS
. L.ow 2484 cr3 ".
1M Low/Mec;tUft 3~'.~ H 1133 ,
II - 13'.' ..." 1110 PO
... ............" 120.$ 11-'8 "10
H ..." ." '....27. 1en
......T_ ~--- -
10251 1834
N:lN.RESlJENnAL .
.....".... AalES PO
C - H.'
c-o -- 12.'
~1J'1IYe
.... ,-- 132.
~edl4n.llac1l.n'lll
0 Open Sole. 113 0
PO P\,t*/o.....-fI'I.d:: 1033
, Pwtl....FlIc:r-=r'l ,...
....jQtQn'UatiCln 2".'
_T.... .....
~ ........... 14.'
_T.... 2018.1 Ie 1h4 du
.~I'C_C_""
.
~ fA STLA KE
A PLANNED COMMUNITY BY EASTlAKE OEYElOPlv'ENT CO
mCinti
u&.>.sscoaIe$
hl")fn/"~~
~..Ifp
EXHIBIT B
PROPERTY OWNED:
1. Personal residence at 5647 Dorothy Way, San Diego, CA 92115
2. Two-bedroom condominium located at 1260-C Clevel and Street, #127, San
Diego, CA 92103
WPC 9410P
-10-
cg-I{
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Itl!lll CJ
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 5/5/92
Resolution 110(., II:> Amending contract with Robert Bein,
William Frost and Associates, Inc. for design engineering
services required for drainage channel improvements north of
East Naples from Hilltop Drive to Z 7 feet east
Director of Public Work
City Manager
(4/5ths Vote: Yes___No___)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
On September 19, 1989, by Resolution 15306, the City Council, approved an
agreement between the Ci ty of Chul a Vi sta and Robert Bei n, Wi 11 i am Frost and
Associates for design engineering services required for the drainage channel
improvements north of East Naples Street from Hilltop Drive to 767 feet east.
On March 3, 1992, in response to Council direction, staff presented a report
to the Council recommending to proceed with an alternative design to replace
the existing unimproved channel with a concrete invert and stabilized grass
side slopes. This alternative is the preferred choice of the community
directly impacted by the drainage problem and the California Department of
Fish and Game. On that date, Council accepted the report and authorized staff
to proceed with the design of this alternative.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the first amendment to the original
contract and authorize an increase in the total contract of $8,215.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The general scope of this project as specified in the original agreement with
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates (RBF) and approved by Council
Resolution No. 15306 was to prepare the plans and specification for the
construction of a concrete lined channel within the existing natural channel.
As earl ier stated in the report presented to Council on February 24, 1992
(copy attached) city staff and RBF under Council direction consulted with the
community residents and the Cal ifornia Department of Fish and Game and based
on the response received, an alternative design was proposed for the
improvement of the channel. The proposed des i gn a 1 ternat i ve as approved by
Council provides for the construction of a trapezoidal channel with grass
lined slopes and concrete invert.
q-I
Page 2, I tl!ll
Meeting Date
l1
5/5/92
Since the original design was nearly complete, an amendment to the contract
needs to be approved to prepare the revi sed pl ans. Staff has recei ved and
reviewed the fee proposal and amendments to the proposed schedule of the
project and recommends that the existing contract with Robert Bein, Will iam
Frost and Associates be amended to include additional engineering design
services required for a not-to-exceed fee of $8,215.
The original agreement with Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates
authorized the City to make changes in the scope of services that consultant
will perform under the agreement. Such changes including any increase or
decrease in the amount of work to be performed by the Consultant shall be
effective as amendments to agreement only when in writing. Staff is
recommending that Council authorize a first amendment to the agreement with
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates to include additional hydraulic
analysis, final engineering services for the preparation of construction plans
and profile, geotechnical services, construction staking and final
specifications, and cost estimates.
FISCAL IMPACT: The original contract with Robert Bein, William Frost and
Associates was for $33,500. The contract modification will increase the
consultant fees by an additional not-to-exceed amount of $8,215. Adequate
funds are available in the budgeted Capital Improvement Project for drainage
channel improvements north of East Naples Street from Hilltop to 767 feet east.
SA/AR-028
WPC 5972E/PC
Q-1./9-11
MEMORANDUM
April 21, 1992
File # AR-028
TO:
John D. Goss, City Manger
Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney
Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
FROM: John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution amending contract with Robert Bein, William
Frost and Associates, Incorporated for design engineering
services required for drainage channel improvements north
of East Naples Street from Hilltop Drive to 767 feet east
Funds required:
Funds available: (600-6003-DRl12)
$8,215.00
$8,215.00
AC:kw
(AC\CONTRACT.MEM)
<\-~
RESOLUTION NO. ''''''' \ c
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING CONTRACT WITH ROBERT
BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR
DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES REQUIRED FOR
DRAINAGE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS NORTH OF EAST
NAPLES FROM HILLTOP DRIVE TO 767 FEET EAST
WHEREAS, on September 19, 1989, by Resolution 15306, the
city Council, approved an agreement between the City of Chula vista
and Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates for design
engineering services required for the drainage channel improvements
north of East Naples Street from Hilltop Drive to 767 feet east;
and
WHEREAS, on March 3, 1992, in response to Council
direction, staff presented a report to the Council recommending to
proceed with an alternative design to replace the existing
unimproved channel with a concrete invert and stabilized grass side
slopes, which is the preferred choice of the community directly
impacted by the drainage problem and the California Department of
Fish and Game; and
WHEREAS, Council accepted the report and authorized staff
to proceed with the design of this alternative.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the First Amendment to
Agreement with Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, Inc.
providing for, among others, an increase of $8,215 in the maximum
compensation, for additional design engineering services required
for drainage channel improvements north of East Naples from Hilltop
Drive to 767 feet east, a copy of which is on file on the office of
the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
Chula vista is hereby authorized and
amendment for an on behalf of the City
the Mayor of the city of
directed to execute said
of Chula vista.
Presented by
y
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
C:\r\bein last amend
C\-s I q-,
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is made and entered into
this day of , 1992, by and between the CITY
OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, a public corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "ci ty" , and ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND
ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED, a California corporation hereinafter
referred to as "consultant", whose address is 71 N. Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, California, 91910-1099, for professional engineering
services in connection with City of Chula vista drainage
improvements north of Naples Street from Hilltop Drive to
approximately 800 feet east.
RECITAL
A. WHEREAS, on September 19, 1989, by Council Resolution
#15306, an agreement to provide engineering design services was
entered into between the City and the consultant for the design of
drainage improvements north of Naples Street from Hilltop Drive to
approximately 800 feet east ("Original Agreement").
B. WHEREAS, certain unanticipated events have arisen during
the course of performing the Original Agreement, outside the
original scope of work contained in original Agreement.
C. WHEREAS, the City Council on March 3, 1992 directed the
City Engineer to proceed with the design of a grass-lined
trapezoidal channel with concrete invert being the preferred choice
of drainage improvement desired by the community and the California
Department of Fish and Game.
D. WHEREAS, section 12 of the original Agreement required
that any changes to the scope of work to be performed by the
consultant shall be mutually agreed upon by the city and
consultant.
E.
with the
resources
WHEREAS, the city desires to proceed in a timely manner
construction of this project and lacks sufficient
to design the project in a timely manner.
F. WHEREAS, the consultant represents that it is qualified,
has personnel and facilities available necessary to accomplish the
work within the required time, and consultant desires to undertake
same.
WITNESSETH THAT, in consideration of the recitals and mutual
obligations of the duties as herein expressed, City and consultant
agree that the Original Agreement is amended as follows:
"'-1
I. section 1: Scope of work, is amended to add at the end the
following:
I. Consultant shall perform all engineering hydraulic
analysis necessary to design the channel. Hydraulic
analysis shall be prepared using the Los Angeles county
Department of Public Works water surface profile program
WSPG. The analysis will account for the change in
hydraulic roughness of the channel section as a result of
vegetated side slopes. Hydraulic calculations will also
be performed to improve the hydraulic operation of the
inlet to the existing culvert. The methodology shall
include hydraulic design of improved inlets for culverts
by the u.S. Department of Transportation Hydraulic
Engineering Circular No. 13, August 1972.
J. Consul tant shall provide an updated geotechnical
analysis verifying the proposed design. Analysis will be
summarized in letter format.
K. Consultant
estimates and
necessitated by
shall review and modify project cost
specifications to reflect changes
the new design alternative.
L. Consultant shall revise the existing improvement
plans for the Naples Street channel to show a concrete
invert and vegetated side slopes. Plan revisions shall
include the addition of structural details to describe
the placement of the flexible concrete mat lining and the
interface with reinforced concrete improvements. Plans
shall be revised to incorporate an overflow weir from the
existing 60" culvert entrance to Hilltop Drive and
improvements to the entrance condition of the existing
culvert indicated by the hydraulic analysis using a side
taper and/or slope taper inlet. Revisions are based on
a 1.5:1 side slope or steeper for the side walls of the
channel.
M. Consultant shall update the basis of design study for
the channel to include the new design assumptions,
results of the hydraulic analysis and additional
structural calculations that verify stability of the
flexible channel lining, and additional appurtenant
structures including the overflow weir and improved
channel inlet. Improved inlet will be a modified
standard design and no structural calculations will be
required for this modified inlet.
q-~
II. section 2: Authorization, Progress and Completion.
Replace the last two paragraphs with the following paragraph in the
original Agreement to read as follows: Consultant shall perform
all of the defined services herein required of them, excepting
therefrom tasks E and F of the original agreement, within (4) weeks
of authorization following execution of this First Amendment,
excluding review by governmental agencies.
III. Section 4: Compensation. Add the following after the
existing text: In addition to the compensation provided in the
section above (the original agreement) the compensation to be paid
by the City to consultant for all additional work required for the
drainage channel as specified in this First Amendment shall be a
not to exceed fee of Eight Thousand Two Hundred Fifteen Dollars
($8,215) based upon the attached fee schedule (Exhibit A) payable
per task in monthly progress payments in an amount that the Public
Works Director, or his designee, shall determine corresponds to the
value provided to the city to the date of billing. Payments shall
be based on the invoice and fee schedule per task set forth in
Exhibit A.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment
to Agreement on the day and year first-above written.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Mayor of the city of Chula vista
Attest:
City Clerk
Approved as to form by:
Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney
AC\dv:nm:cf
(AC\RBFAMEND.AGR)
q..~
EXHIBIT "A"
COMPENSATION FOR ADDITIONAL
SERVICES IN FIRST AMENDMENT
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates will complete the work
outlined herein and invoice the City monthly on a percentage
completion basis in accordance with the schedule of fees per task
shown below.
TASK
DESCRIPTION
COMPENSATION
Task L
Task M
Hydraulic analysis
Geotechnical Analysis
Revise Specifications and
cost estimates
Revise construction plans
Update basis of design report
$ 935
300
Task I
Task J
Task K
TOTAL FEE
680
4,440
1. 360
$7,715
500
$8,215
SUBTOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEES
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
AC:dv:nm:cf
(AC/RBFAMEND.AGR)
C\~ID
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
If fZ..-o ~
Itelll 11
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 3/3/92
Report on the construction of drainage improvements north of
East Naples Street from Hilltop Drive to 767 feet east
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works ~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager (4/Sths Vote: Yes___No-X-)
During the CIP budget review for FY 1991-92, the City Council requested a
status report for this project. The report was presented by the City Manager
on May 28, 1991. Subsequently, on August 9, 1991, the Mayor and staff met
with affected property owners. At that meeting, several of the community
residents requested a detailed construction alternatives study and cost
estimate. This report will present the result of this study in addition to
the result of a cOlllllunity survey conducted by the City staff to determine
COlllllunity preferences.
RECOttIENDATION: Accept the report which indicates that staff will proceed
with Alternative No.3 consisting of replacing the existing unimproved channel
with a concrete invert and stabilized grass side slopes.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOttIENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
This project was first budgeted in the FY 1988-89 Capital Improvement. The
purpose of the project was to install a concrete channel which will eliminate
erosion and enhance flow characteristics, thus eliminating unsightly and
unhealthy ponds of stagnant water (mosquito breeders) as well as reducing
maintenance efforts and costs.
A contract was awarded to the firm of Robert Bein, William Frost and
Associates (RBF) on September 19, 1989 for the preparation of final
construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates. The 85% complete
plans, specifications, and cost estimates was submitted to Engineering staff
on July 6, 1990.
;; ,: ),~
/ i
The project was scheduled to be advertised for bidding on August II, 1990 with
construction to begin on October 8, 1990. This schedule was not met because a
letter dated July 9, 1990 was submitted to the City Council by a concerned
property owner, Mr. Joseph M. Byrne, challenging the negative declaration for
the project (IS-90-46).
Also, the City received a memo on August 27, 1990 from the~{ifornia
Department of Fish and Game notifying the City that a Streambed teration
Agreement would have to be obtained from their department for this oject and
the memo also listed some deficiencies in the negative declar tion. The
Department of Fish and Game recolllllended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration
be recirculated with the appropriate assessments, alternatives/and mitigation
measures provided in the document. The Department of Fish and Game also
indicated a preference for an earthen channel that woul~ 'provide wildlife
habitat as well as provide flood measures, over the current concrete channel
des~gn. ~
"~/CZ;-9) Cl.-l\ //'
Page 2, IteJII ) 1
Meeting Date 3/3/92
The Planning Department prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration,
incorporating the findings of a biological survey conducted in the project
area by Pacific Southwest Biological Services, Inc. The Mitigated Negative
Declaration was circulated through the State clearing house from April IB -
June 7, 1991.
Mr. Byrne on May 19, 1991 responded with an "opposition report" to the
Mitigated Negative Declaration.
The Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and we are now in a position to enter into a Streambed Alteration
Agreement once a decision is made on the design alternatives.
The City Council, during the CIP budget review for FY 1991-92, requested a
status report for this project. The report was presented by the City Manager
which addressed most of the issues earlier mentioned. Subsequently, the
Public Works Department set up a meeting with all the property owners ,affected
by this project.
On August B, 1991, the Mayor, Engineering and Planning staff and
representatives from the firm of RBF met with 22 property owners affected by
the project. At that meeting, the Mayor and several of the community
residents requested that staff and the consultant review and provide a
detailed cost estimate for the four alternatives discussed at the meeting.
Staff indicated at the meeting that, because of the City's fiscal constraints,
it can only recommend the minimum cost alternative which is acceptable to the
regulatory agencies having any jurisdiction over this area. Staff also
indicated that proceeding with an expensive solution would require a formation
of an assessment district which would assess the additional costs to those
property owners receiving benefit from the project.
The four alternatives evaluated by consultant and staff are as follows:
Alternative No. 1 - Replace the existing unimproved channel with a reinforced
concrete pipe. Estimated Cost: $426,000.
Alternative No. 2 - Redirect the East Naples Street drainage system to a new
conduit in Naples Street flowing westerly to Hilltop Drive. Regrade the
existing Naples channel to convey remaining tributary flows. Estimated Cost:
$563,000. .
Alternative No. 3 - Replace the existing unimproved channel with a concrete
lined invert and grass side slopes. This alternative appears to be acceptable
to DFG. Estimated Cost: $306,000.
Alternative No. 4 - Improve the existing ,earth channel with reinforced
concrete lined section. Improvement plans were previously prepared for this
alternative. Estimated Cost: $334,000.
q - \2.
/
Paye 3, Item l~
Meeting Date 3/3/92
On December 12, 1991, the Engineering Department sent a total of 26 letters to
all affected property owners. These letters summarized the four alternatives
evaluated. A statement was attached to each letter to allow every property
owner to indicate his/her preferred alternative. Additionally, a copy of the
entire report was sent to Mr. and Mrs. Tumangan, Mr. Joseph Byrne and Ms.
Laura Verdugo, and interested property owners were asked to contact the City
or either of these people if they wanted to examine the report. The property
owners were requested to return their response to Engineering by January 10,
1992 and a no response would be considered as a selection of alternative no. 3
since it is the most economical alternative.
A total of 11 property owners have responded to our survey indicating their
preferred alternatives. Of the 11 property owners who responded:
One owner preferred Alternative No. 1
No owner preferred Alternative No. 2
Seven owners preferred Alternative No. 3
Three owners preferred Alternative No. 4
The response staff received from property owners indicates that the overall
community interest in this project does not favor an assessment district and
favors Alternative No.3.
Engineering staff is recommending that the City proceed with Alternative No. 3
because: 1) it is the preferred a 1 tern at i ve by the majori ty of property
owners; 2) it is the most economi ca 1; and 3) it appears to be acceptable to
the Department of Fish and Game.
All property owners on the enclosed list have been notified of tonight's
meeting and have been sent a copy of the Council agenda statement.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the budgeted Capital
Improvement Project of drainage improvements north of East Naples Street from
Hilltop Drive to 767 feet east. Additional funds are required for consultant
fees to pay for the proposed design modification.
SA:/AR-028
WPC 5887E/Alex
.
C\ .. \'~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ) D
Meeting Date 5/5/92
ITEM TITLE: Resol ut i on I~/' /I Approving agreement between the County
of San Diego, Southwestern Community College District, and the
Ci ty of Chul a Vi sta for construction, maintenance and
operation of the Southwestern College Transit Center
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Publ ic Works ryytI
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-x-)
At its meeting on February 20, 1990, Council approved an agreement between the
County of San Diego, Southwestern College and the City of Chula Vista for a
Southwestern Coll ege Trans it Center feasi bil i ty study. The study whi ch is
included as part of the attached agreement, determined that a transit center
at Southwestern College is both feasible and necessary to provide more
convenient and accessible publ ic transportation to the college and eastern
Chula Vista. Alternative 1 (figure 6 and 7 in the study) is the recommended
site plan. The agreement, and Alternative 1 Conceptual Site Plan, have been
approved by the Southwestern College Board of Directors.
The total estimated cost of the transit center project is $1,150,000,
including contingencies. This agreement authorizes the County to proceed with
final design and construction of the transit center, and defines maintenance
and operation responsibilities between the College and the City once the
center is completed. According to County staff, the project will follow
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines for environmental
approva 1 s, and it shoul d requi re only a Negative Declaration. The agreement
also authorizes the County to claim up to $250,000 of City of Chula Vista TDA
4.0 funds, if the cost exceeds $900,000 which the County has programmed for
this project.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve: I} agreement between the County of
San Diego, Southwestern Community College District, and the City of Chula
Vi sta for the construct ion, mai ntenance and operation of the Southwestern
College Transit Center, and 2} conceptual site plan Alternative 1 as shown in
the Southwestern College Transit Center feasibility study.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
A transit center at Southwestern College would serve two main purposes:
improve current and future CVT service to the college; and function as a
transfer poi nt for future CVT routes operating in areas east of Southwestern
Co 11 ege .
The transit center includes a bus loading area for six vehicles. It would be
located between Gotham and Elmhurst Streets and includes a traffic signal at
the intersection of Elmhurst Street and Otay Lakes Road to facilitate traffic
flow from the center and the college. The major components of the agreement
state that the:
ID -I
Page 2, Itelll /0
Meeting Date 5/5/92
Count v will:
Contribute up to $900,000 in TDA funds for transit center
development.
Act as lead agency for construction.
ColleQe will:
Dedicate real property for the transit center to the City of Chula
Vista.
Pay for utilities (electrical and water) after transit center
completion.
Be responsible for daily routine maintenance and cleaning of the
transit center, including trash pick.up, landscape maintenance, and
removal of stain/spills from structure surfaces.
Citv will:
Authorize County to claim up to $250,000 of City of Chula Vista TOA
Article 4.0 funds for transit center development, if needed, after
expenditure of $900,000 in County funds.
Be responsible for major maintenance, repair and operation of the
transit center, including damage to structures, graffiti removal,
and tree trimming (costs associated with these repair or maintenance
items will be covered by TOA Article 4.0 funds).
Maintain insurance or self-insured responsibility for negligent
maintenance and operation of the completed facility.
If this agreement is approved by all parties, construction of the transit
center tentatively would begin in January 1993 and completed in Summer 1993.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total estimated cost of the Southwestern Transit Center
is $1,150,000, which includes the completed feasibility study, engineering
drawings, and construction. Southwestern College will dedicate the land to
the City for the transit center. The County of San Diego has programmed
$900,000 for this project, and the City will commit up to $250,000 of its TOA
Article 4.0 funds to this project, if needed, after expenditure of the County
funds. It is difficult to estimate annual major maintenance and repair costs,
or potential liability costs related to completed center operations. However,
SCOOT maintenance and repair costs at the "H" Street Trolley Station Transit
Center (which is a comparable hcil ity to the one proposed at the College)
have averaged about $800 annually over the past ten years, and there have been
no liability costs related to the Transit Center.
WPC 1532T
File: OS-030/0S-037
ID-2
RESOLUTION No._/I.\'11
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT, AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF
THE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE TRANSIT CENTER
WHEREAS, at its meeting of February 20, 1990, Council
approved an agreement between the County of San Diego, Southwestern
College and the city of Chula vista for a Southwestern College
Transit Center feasibility study; and
WHEREAS, the feasibility study has been completed which
concluded that the Southwestern College Transit Center Project is
necessary and feasible; and
WHEREAS, the agreement, and Alternative 1 Conceptual site
Plan, have been approved by the Southwestern College Board of
Directors; and
WHEREAS, the total estimated cost of the transit center
project is $1,150,000, including contingencies; and
WHEREAS, said agreement authorizes the county to proceed
with construction of the transit center and defines maintenance and
operation responsibility between the College and the City once the
center is completed; and
WHEREAS, according to County staff, the proj ect will
follow California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines for
environmental approvals through use of a Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve agreement between the
County of San Diego, Southwestern Community College District, and
the City of Chula vista for construction, maintenance and operation
of the Southwestern College Transit Center, a copy of which is on
file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
approve the Conceptual site Plan Alternative 1 as shown in the
Southwestern College Transit Center feasibility study.
/tJ - 3
L'(
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
C:\rs\Tran.it center
/IJ - 'I
Bruce M.
Attorney
Oy
City
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
1'1# I. ci
Resolution: Resident/Non-resident Green Fee Schedule for the Chula Vista
Municipal Golf Course
Director of Parks and Recreatio~
City Managerff'"
v
Item Number lL
Meeting Date: 5/51'12
Item Title:
(4/5ths vote Yes_ No X)
COUNCIL REFERRAL #2294
At the meeting of March 19, 1991, Council approved the current green fee schedule for the Chula
Vista Municipal Golf Course. Council directed staff and American Golf to develop and present to
Council a proposal for a resident discount rate before any future increase is considered. At the
Council meeting of April 28, 1992, Council requested additional information on financial impact.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resident/non-resident fee schedule proposed by
American Golf and waive the resident requirement for the Chula Vista Men's and Women's Clubs.
BOARDS AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: At its April 1992 meeting the Parks and
Recreation Commission voted 5-0 (Carpenter - Willett absent) to approve the golf course fee
increase. A copy of the minutes of that meeting are attached (Attachment A).
DISCUSSION: American Golf has developed and is proposing a two tiered resident/non-resident
rate system requested by Council. The two tier schedule will maintain the current green fee rates
for Chula Vista residents and waive the resident requirement for Chula Vista Men's and Women's
Golf Club members; and increase the fees for non-residents by $2 for weekday rates and $3 for
weekend rates (Attachment B). The Chula Vista Men's Golf Club has reviewed and supports the
new rate structure (Attachment C).
The Department has analyzed the new greens fee schedule for the two tier system and concluded that
the greens fees at Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course will continue to rank on the low end of the
spectrum with comparable golf courses. The following public and semi-private golf courses were used
in the comparison:
GOLF COURSES - PUBLIC WEEKDAY RATES WEEKEND RATES
Chula Vista - Resident (existing rate) $13.00 $17.00
Chula Vista - Non-resident (new rate) $15.00 $20.00
Coronado $16.00 $16.00
Balboa - Resident $12.00 $14.00
Balboa - County $17.00 $21.00
Balboa - non-County $33.00 $38.00
Torrey Pines - Resident $14.00 $16.00
Torrey Pines - County $22.00 $24.00
Torrey Pines - non-County $38.00 $44.00
t~ ... \
Proposed Golf Course Fee Schedule
Meeting Date: 4!2B/'n.
GOLF COURSES SEMI-PUBLIC WEEKDAY RATES WEEKEND RATES
Rancho San Diego - Ivanho $26.00 $31.00
Rancho San Diego - Monte Vista $23.00 $27.00
Singing Hills - Oak Glen $25.00 $30.00
Singing Hills - Willow Glen $25.00 $30.00
Bonita Golf Club $15.00 $22.00
EastLake $25.00 $40.00
Steele Canyon $38.00 $48.00
In a comparison of the municipal golf courses surveyed, Balboa's resident fee is slightly lower, but
their non-resident fees are higher. Coronado's weekday rates ar higher than Chula Vista's, but the
weekend fee is $1.00 less.
Bonita Golf Club's rates were higher than Chula Vista's, and the other semi-public courses' green
fees were considerably higher.
The resident/non-resident program proposed by American Golf is patterned after the City of San
Diego's program, which requires residents to purchase an annual resident card for $8. The purpose
of the resident card is to eliminate the burden and the time consuming effort of identifying and
verifying every golfer when paying green fees. To be eligible to purchase a resident card, one of the
following types of identification will be required: drivers license, utility bills (SDG&E), zoning map
or membership in the Chula Vista Men's or Women's Club. The annual resident fee of $8 will
reimburse the golf course's administrative costs for the two tiered program.
American Golf also has submitted a letter (Attachment D) which the Department requested
regarding status of 1991 Capital Improvements and the proposed Capital Improvement Projects for
1992. In 1991, additional work was completed on the drainage channel. The benefit of the funds
and efforts spent on this improvement were realized during the numerous rainstorms this winter. The
Course did not have to close the front nine for play despite the heavy downpours and only had to
restrict play on the back nine when Central Avenue was flooded. The channel was able to contain
the surrounding areas runoff and reduce major damage to the golf course. In FY92, American Golf
intends to rebuild #13 green and replace the driving range netting.
Financial Analvsis
In response to Council's request on April 28, 1992, for additional information regarding potential
financial impact of waiving the resident requirement for non-resident members of the Men's and
Women's Club, the following information is provided:
2
\\..,.
Proposed Golf Course Fee Schedule
Meeting Date:5/5J92
I. Club Membership
A
Men's Club
Resident
NonResident
380
159 (42%)
221 (58%)
B.
Women's Club
Resident
Nonresident
90
56 (62%)
34 (38%)
II. Monthly Rounds Men's Club Members - March
To determine the financial impact of non-resident club members, the Men's Club provided
the monthly printout of golf rounds recorded in March 1992. A total of 716 rounds were
played at Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course by Club members. The resident members
played 423 rounds and nonresidents 293.
Resident
Nonresident
423 rounds (59%)
293 rounds (41%)
III. Monthly Rounds Women's Club Members - March
American Golfs records indicate the Women's Club members play primarily on Tuesday
mornings on "Ladies Day", a total of 160 rounds by Club members in March. Based on the
membership, resident members played 128 rounds and nonresidents 32 rounds.
Resident
Nonresident
128 rounds (80%)
32 rounds (20%)
IV. Financial Impact
Using the March rounds as a basis for the yearly totals, the following additional revenues would be
generated if the City adopted the resident only policy.
1. 325 Nonresident rounds x $3.00 = $975 gross green fees
2. $975 x City's 15% of $146.00
3. $146 x 12 months = $1,752 more revenue
V. Potential Reduction in Nonresident Member Play
The Department has developed a scenario which contemplates if nonresident club members cease
playing at the course because of an increase in green fees. This scenario projects a possible 10%
reduction in rounds played by nonresidents. This does not take into consideration the loss of "other
revenue" ie., golf cart rental, driving range, merchandise and bar and restaurant support.
3
\\...;
Proposed Golf Course Fee Schedule
Meeting Date:5/5192
10% Reduction
1. 325 x 10% = 33 less rounds
2. 33 rounds x $17.00 green fee = $561
3. $561 x 15% = $84.00
4. $84 x 12 months = $1,008 less revenue
To determine the new revenue generated by the two tiered system, a 50% nonresident factor was
assumed. Revenues from green fee sources were $960,000 in 1991-92. Taking into account the
overall green fee revenue, $480,000 can be attributed to nonresident golfers. The new nonresident
rate is increased by approximately 15%. If the level of nonresident rounds remains the same, an
additional $72,000 ($480,000 x 15%) will be realized and the City's share of revenues would be
$10,800 (72,000 x 15%).
FISCAL IMP ACf: An estimated $10,800 additional City revenue will be generated from nonresident
user fees.
greenfee
4
\\..~
o
.0-_".\....-;).';
RESOLUTION NO.
16608
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING RESIDENT/NON-RESIDENT
GREEN FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
WHEREAS, at the meeting of March 19, 1991, council
approved the current green fee schedule for the Chula vista
Municipal Golf Course; and
WHEREAS, Council directed staff and American Golf to
develop and present to Council a proposal for a resident discount
rate before any future increase is considered; and
WHEREAS, American Golf has developed and is proposing a
two tiered Resident/Non-resident rate system, requested by council,
which will maintain the current green fee rates for Chula vista
residents and Chula vista Men's Golf Club and Chula vista Ladies'
Golf Association members; and increase the fees for non-residents
by $2 for weekday rates and $3 for weekend rates (Attachment A);
WHEREAS, a resident discount card is established at an
annual charge of $8. Residency requirements must be met to
purchase the discount card. One of the following forms of
identification will be required to show proof of residency:
1. Driver's License
2. Current utility Bill
3. A Parcel Map showing location of Chula vista
property ownership
WHEREAS, resident rates would apply to residents of the
city of Chula vista, members of the Chula vi~ta Mens's Club, who
are either residents, or who have paid a $25.00 one-time only fee
to the city of Chula vista, and members of the Chula vista Ladies'
Golf Association, who are either residents or who have paid a
$25.00 one-time only fee to the city of Chula Vista, with said
revenues being credited to the City; and
WHEREAS, at its April 1992 meeting the Parks and
Recreation commission voted 5-0-0 (Carpenter and Willett absent) to
approve the golf course fee; and
WHEREAS, the Department has analyzed the new greens fee
schedule for the two tier system and concluded that the greens fees
at Chula vista Municipal Golf Course will continue to rank on the
low end of the spectrum with comparable golf courses.
1\ -s
.
.
.
RESOLt1'1'ION NO. / ~ t tJ Y
~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP
CllULA VISTA APPROVING RESIDENT/NON-RESIDENT
GREEN FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CKULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL GOLP COURSE
(
WHEREAS, at the meeting of March 19, 1991, Council
approved the current green fee schedule for the Chula Vista
Municipal Golf Course; and
WHEREAS, Council directed staff and American Golf to
develop and present to Council a proposal for a resident discount
rate before any future increase is considered; and
WHEREAS, American Golf has developed and is proposing a
two tiered resident/non-resident rate system requested by Council
which will maintain the current green fee rates for Chula Vista
residents and Chula Vista Men's and Women's Golf Club members; and
increase the fees for non-residents by $2 for weekday rates and $3
f9r weekend rates (Attachment B);
WHEREAS, at its April
Recreation COl1Ullission voted 5-0
approve the golf course fee; and
WHEREAS, the Department has analyzed the new greens fee
schedule for the two tier system and concluded that the greens fees
at Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course will continue to rank on the
low end of the spectrum with comparable golf courses.
1992 meeting the Parks and
(Carpenter - Willett out) to
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the Resident/Non-
resident Green Fee Schedule for the Chula Vista Municipal Golf
Course as set forth in Exhibit B, a copy of which is on file in the
office of the City Clerk.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~ ">4 ~c{
or of
Ruth M. Fritsch, Assistant
City Attorney
\\.. ~
.,
I,.
,~ . ~ .
!
RESOLUTION NO.
16608
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING RESIDENT/NON-RESIDENT
GREEN FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
WHEREAS, at the meeting of March 19, 1991, Council
approved the current green fee schedule for the Chula vista
Municipal Golf Course; and
WHEREAS, Council directed staff and American Golf to
develop and present to Council a proposal for a resident discount
rate before any future increase is considered; and
WHEREAS, American Golf has developed and is proposing a
two tiered Resident/Non-resident rate system, requested by Council,
which will maintain the current green fee rates for Chula vista
residents and Chula vista Men's Golf Club and Chula Vista Ladies'
Golf Association members; and increase the fees for non-residents
by $2 for weekday rates and $3 for weekend rates (Attachment A);
WHEREAS, a resident discount card is established at an
annual charge of $8. Residency requirements must be met to
purchase the discount card. One of the following forms of
identification will be required to show proof of residency:
1. Driver's License
2. Current Utility Bill
3. A Parcel Map showing location of Chula Vista
property ownership
WHEREAS, resident rates would apply to residents of the
City of Chula vista, members of the Chula vista Mens's Club, who
are either residents, or who have paid a $25.00 one-time only fee
to the city of Chula Vista, and members of the Chula vista Ladies'
Golf Association, who are either residents or who have paid a
$25.00 one-time only fee to the City of Chula Vista, with said
revenues being credited to the City; and
WHEREAS, at its April 1992 meeting the Parks and
Recreation Commission voted 5-0-0 (Carpenter and Willett absent) to
approve the golf course fee; and
WHEREAS, the Department has analyzed the new greens fee
schedule for the two tier system and concluded that the greens fees
at Chula vista Municipal Golf Course will continue to rank on the
low end of the spectrum with comparable golf courses.
1\- 5
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the Resident/Non-
resident Green Fee Schedule for the Chula Vista Municipal Golf
Course as set forth in Attachment A, a copy of which is on file in
the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the new Resident/Non-resident
rate system and resident discount card is effective May 16, 1992,
and that a one-time assessment fee of $25 shall be imposed for new
non-resident members of the Chula vista Mens' Club and the Chula
Vista Ladies' Association, beginning July 1, 1992.
Presented by
a, Director of
eation
Bruce M. Boogaa
City Attorney
Il-S~ I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby approve the Resident/Non-
resident Green Fee Schedule for the Chula vista Municipal Golf
Course as set forth in Attachment A, a copy of which is on file in
the office of the city Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the new Resident/Non-resident
rate system and resident discount card is effective May 16, 1992,
and that a one-time assessment fee of $25 shall be imposed for new
non-resident members of the Chula vista Mens' Club and the Chula
vista Ladies' Association, beginning July 1, 1992.
~
Presented by
as
a, Director of
eat ion
Bruce M. Boogaa
City Attorney
Il-S". \
Attachment A
STANDARD GREENS FEES
Number of
Holes Applicable Davsrrimes/Months
18 Monday through Friday (excluding legal holidays) Res
Non
18 Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays Res
Non
9 Monday through Friday (excluding legal holidays) Res
Non
Monday through Friday/twilight Res
Non
Monday through Friday/super twilight Res
Non
9 Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays Res
Non
Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays/twilight Res
Non
Saturdays, Sundays and legal holiday/super twilight Res
Non
18 Resident Senior with Monthly Pass
18 Resident Senior with yearly discount card ($10.00)
(Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays)
Greens Fees
$13.00
15.00
17.00
20.00
8.00'
9.00'
9.00
10.00
7.00
8.00
10.00'
12.00'
11.00
13.00
8.00
9.00
1.00
6.50
9
Resident Senior (Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays)
4.00'
1. Resident rates would apply to residents of the City of Chula Vista, members of the
Chula Vista Men's Club, who are either residents, or who have paid a $25.00 one-
time only fee to the City of Chula Vista, and members of the Chula Vista Ladies'
Golf Association, who are either residents or who have paid a $25.00 one-time only
fee to the City of Chula Vista.
-1-
II-S~2-
Attachment A
.
9-Hole play would continue to be scheduled in the early morning on the back nine
onlv. Once the front nine golfers are finished, 9-hole play will be limited after 12:00
noon.
JUNIOR MONTIIL Y TICKET
The cost of a junior monthly ticket is hereby established as $25.00. Said monthly ticket shall entitle
a junior (defined as non-college students who have not reached their eighteenth birthday or
completed their senior year of high school) to playa maximum of 18 holes per day after the hour of
2:00 p.m., subject to any rules, regulations or restrictions imposed by the management of the Chula
Vista Municipal Golf Course.
RESIDENT DISCOUNT CARD
A resident discount card is established at an annual charge of $8.00. Residency requirements must
be met to purchase the discount card. One of the following forms of identification will be required
to show proof of residency:
1. Driver's License
2. Current Utility Bill
3. A Parcel Map showing location of Chula Vista property ownership
RESIDENT SENIOR DISCOUNT CARD
The resident senior discount card is established as an annual charge of $10.00. An age eligibility
requirement must be met and the following restrictions are imposed to qualify for this special
discount.
1.
Chula Vista residency. Said residency shall be verified by
license or voter registration card.
driver's
2. The individual must be at least 62 years of age.
3. Play is restricted to weekdays only, holidays excluded.
RESIDENT SENIOR MONTIILY PASS
Resident senior monthly pass is to be sold at an annual charge of $40.00 and then only to Chula Vista
residents 62 years of age or older. Permitted play under the monthly pass is to be restricted to
weekdays only, holidays excluded.
-2-
l\-$-~
Attachment A
.
9-Hole play would continue to be scheduled in the early morning on the back nine
only. Once the front nine golfers are finished, 9-hole play will be limited after 12:00
noon.
JUNIOR MONTHLY TICKET
The cost of a junior monthly ticket is hereby established as $25.00. Said monthly ticket shall entitle
a junior (defined as non-college students who have not reached their eighteenth birthday or
completed their senior year of high school) to playa maximum of 18 holes per day after the hour of
2:00 p.m., subject to any rules, regulations or restrictions imposed by the management of the Chula
Vista Municipal Golf Course.
RESIDENT DISCOUNT CARD
A resident discount card is established at an annual charge of $8.00. Residency requirements must
be met to purchase the discount card. One of the following forms of identification will be required
to show proof of residency:
1. Driver's License
2. Current Utility Bill
3. A Parcel Map showing location of Chula Vista property ownership
RESIDENT SENIOR DISCOUNT CARD
The resident senior discount card is established as an annual charge of $10.00. An age eligibility
requirement must be met and the following restrictions are imposed to qualify for this special
discount.
1.
Chula Vista residency. Said residency shall be verified by
license or voter registration card.
driver's
2. The individual must be at least 62 years of age.
3. Play is restricted to weekdays only, holidays excluded.
RESIDENT SENIOR MONTHLY PASS
;~
J;
W,i
",\
Resident senior monthly pass is to be sold at an annual charge of $40.00 and then only to Chula Vista
residents 62 years of age or older. Permitted play under the monthly pass is to be restricted to
weekdays only, holidays excluded.
-2-
\\-$-~
Attachment A
RAIN CHECKS
No rain checks will be given for any fee category.
LEGAL HOLIDAYS DEFINED
For the purpose of this resolution, legal holidays are defined as follows: January 1, New Year's Day;
February 12, Lincoln's Birthday; third Monday in February, Washington's Birthday; last Monday in
May, Memorial Day; July 4, Independence Day; first Monday in September, Labor Day; September
9, Admission Day; second Monday in October, Columbus Day; November 11, Veterans' Day; fourth
Thursday in November, Thanksgiving; fourth Friday in November; and December 25, Christmas.
-3-
11- S - ~
Attachment A
"
'.
Minutes of a
Regular Meeting of the
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Thursday 6:00 p.m.
April 16, 1992
Public Services Building
Conference Room 1
*******************
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Commissioners Hall, Helton, Lind, Roland
MEMBERS LATE:
Sandoval~Femandez (6:14)
MEMBERS EXCUSED:
Commissioners Carpenter, Willett
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of March 19, 1992 as distributed.
MSC llNDlROLAND 4-0 (SANDOVAL-FERNANDEZ OUI)
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS OR REMARKS
NONE
3. DIRECfOR'S REPORT
Deputy Director Foncerrada reviewed the Parks and Recreation Commission Report and
answered the Commissioners questions regarding this report.
4. REPORTS FOR INFORMATION ONLY
a. Non-profit (Friends of the Park)
Deputy Director Foncerrada reviewed the report that the Department had compiled
regarding the status of the Parks and Recreation non-profit. He stated that the Chair and
Vice Chair of the Commission have, agreed to serve as interim officers during the
reorganization, and their names have been filed with the state as such. Chair Hall asked if
the rotation of Parks and Recreation Commission officers in June would have any effect on
the filing with the State of California. Secretary Stohr said that any change in officers could
be reported when the next annual report was filed with the State.
b. Joint Meetinl! with Montl!omerv Planninl! Committee
Landscape Architect Marty Schmidt presented the Commission with a report on existing parks
within the Montgomery area and proposed projects within the area.
He explored various concepts such as joint use with schools to mitigate the fact that very little
land is available in this area for parkland.
\\-~
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
April 16, 1992
PAGE 2
Commissioner Roland commented that he is opposed to any use of S D G & E righht-of-way
land for parks of any type.
Chair Hall expressed his concern that there had been a major pool/gym facility planned for
the area which is currently not planned. He feels that we should focus on recreational
facilities that can be developed with a minimum of land use.
Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez suggested that this item be agendized as an action item
for next month's agenda thus giving the Commissioners more time to review the written
material that was distributed with the report.
c. Otav Vallev Reeional Park Uodate
Item tabled until next month because the scheduled presenter, Gordon Howard, was not in
attendance.
5. ACTION ITEMS
Unfinished Business
NONE
New Business
a. American Golf Fee Increase
Deputy Director gave an overview of the written report on the golf course fee increase which
had been included in the Commission's information packets.
Chair Hall asked Bert Geisendorff of American Golf if he had encountered any opposition
to the proposed fee increase. Mr. Geisendorff stated that he was not aware of any.
Commissioner Roland stated that he was opposed to the restrictions placed on "9 hole"
golfers in 1990. In addition he does not feel that $8 is a fair price for an identification card.
However, he has no problem with the proposed nonresident fee structure.
Motion to approve the American Golf Fee increase as proposed.
MSC SANDOV AL-FERNANDEZ/LIND 5-0
b. Information and Referral Buildin~
Deputy Director Foncerrada reviewed the report that had been presented to the Commission
in the information packets and stated that staffs recommendation was to allow the library
and the town center manager to occupy the building.
\\ ..~
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
April 16, 1992
PAGE 3
Commissioner Helton asked whether there was no longer a need for space to house
Recreation Division personnel.
Deputy Director Foncerrada replied that a need for space still exists.
Commissioner Helton expressed her strong opposition to allowing the library to use a portion
of the building when it is needed by the Parks and Recreation Department to house
Recreation staff.
Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez stated that it appears that Parks and Recreation staff were
being forced out of the building.
Motion that due to the current needs of parks and recreation staff, the front portion be given
to parks and recreation staff and back portion of building house the Town Manager.
MSC HELTON/ROLAND 5-0
c. Golf Course Restaurant and Bar Sublease
Deputy Director Foncerrada gave a history of the lease situation for the restaurantlbar
located at the Golf Course and outlined the currently proposed sublease. He stated that
staffs recommendation is to approve the sublease as presented.
Commissioner Roland stated that he doesn't understand the logic of why American Golf
wants to maintain control of the lease that they have and sublease rather than just letting the
lease go to someone else. He asked the representative from American Golf if they would be
making a profit from the sublease.
Mr. Bert Geisendorff of American Golf replied that no profit would be made. The reason
for using a sublease is that the restaurant lease is tied to the golf course lease in that the golf
course lease term was extended as a condition of the restaurantlbar lease.
Commissioner Roland stated that he did not like any connection between the golf course
lease and the restaurant lease.
Commissioner Hall asked if Prestige would be working with Joe1en Enterprises to build the
hotel.
Deputy Director Foncerrada stated that he had no knowledge of any connection between the
two entities.
Commissioner Roland asked Mr. Geisendorff if American Golf anticipated a joint venture
with Joe1en Enterprises.
Mr. Geisendorff stated that they did not.
\\ -'\
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
April 16, 1992
PAGE 4
Motion to approve the sublease as presented.
MSC HELTON/SANDOVAL-FERNANDEZ 4-1 (Roland opposed - He is skeptical of big
business and feels that this may be a move toward American Golfs taking over ownership of
the Golf Course.)
6. COMMUNICATIONS
a. Written Correspondence
NONE
b. Commissioners Comments
HELTON - Wishes to know the cost of the copper wall in the Norman Park Center. She
feels that in the future the designs that architects present to the City should be more closely
scrutinized for functionality. Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez suggested that this be
agendized in May.
In addition, Commissioner Helton would like to have an item placed on next month's agenda
regarding the job specifications for the Human Services Coordinator position.
ROLAND - Feels that any restaurant on the golf course site will have to have a specialty in
order to be successful.
HALL - Expressed his concern about a hotel being built adjacent to the golf course.
In addition, he asked for the Commissioners' input for a round table discussion with the
Mayor being held on April 30.
LIND - Would like Chair Hall to recommend to the Mayor on April 30 that the Parks and
Recreation Commission sit down with the Council on a regular basis to have informal
discussions about direction and goals.
He feels that the Youth Sports Council is beginning to feel like a second class entity ie., that
they are being ignore by Parks and Recreation.
Adjournment to the next regularly scheduled meeting of May 21, 1992.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole C. Stohr
\\ ..\t:)
l
c,
~
RESIDENT SENIOR DISCOUNT CARD
The resident senior discount card is established as a annual
$10.00. An age eligibility requirement must be met and the
restrictions are imposed to qualify for this special discount.
charge of
following
1. Chula Vista residency. Said residency shall be verified by
drivers license or voter registration card.
2. The indivtdual must be least 62 years of age.
3. Play is restricted to weekdays only, holidays excluded.
RESIDENT SENIOR MONTHLY PASS
Resident senior monthly pass is to be sold at an annual charge of $40.00
and then only to Chula Vista residents 62 years of age or older. Permitted
play under the monthly pass is to be restricted to weekdays only, holidays
excluded.
RAIN CHECKS
No rain checks will be given for any fee category.
LEGAL HOLIDAYS DEFINED
For the purpose of this resolution, legal holidays are defined as follows:
January 1; New Year's Day
September 9; Admission Day
February 12; Lincoln's Birthday
2nd Monday in October; Columbus Day
3rd Monday in February;
Washington's Birthday
November 11; Veterans' Day
Last Monday in May; Memorial Day
July 4; Independence Day
4th Thursday and Friday in
November; Thanksgiving
December 25; Christmas
1st Monday in September; Labor Day
\\.... \\.
'.
"
Attachment B
STANDARD GREENS FEES
Number of
Holes
18
18
9
9
9
9
9
9
18
18
9
Applicable Days/Times/Months Greens Fees
Monday Thru Friday (Excluding Legal Holidays) Res
Non
Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays
Res
Non
Monday Thru Friday (Excluding Legal Holidays)
Res
Non
Monday Thru Friday (Twilight)
Res
Non
Monday Thru Friday (Super Twilight)
Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays
Res
Non
Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays (Twilight)
Res
Non
Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays (Super Twilight)
Resident Senior with Monthly Pass ($40.00)
Resident Senior with Yearly Discount Card ($10.00)
Resident Senior with Yearly Discount Card
Charoes
13.00
15.00
17.00
20.00
8.00
9.00
9.00
10.00
7.00
10.00
12.00
11.00
13.00
8.00
1. 00
6.50
4.00
1) Resident rates would apply to residents of the City of Chula
Vista, Members of the Chula Vista Men's Club and Members of the
Chula Vista Ladies' Golf Association.
2) 9-Hole play would continue to be scheduled in the early morning
on the back nine onlY. Once the front nine golfers are finished,
9-hole play will be limited after 12:00 noon.
~
LADIES' DAY GREENS FEES
18
Tuesdays only; except when a legal holiday falls on
a Tuesday
JUNIOR MONTHLY TICKET
13.00
The cost of a Junio~ monthly ticket is hereby established as $25.00. Said
monthly ticket shall entitle a Junior (defined as non-college students who
have not reached their eighteenth birthday or completed their senior year
of high school) to playa maximum of 18 holes per day after the hour of
2:00 pm, subject to any rules, regulations or restrictions imposed by the
management of the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course.
\\ - \'2.
.
Attachment C
CHULA VISTA MEN'S GOLF CLUB
P.O. BOX ~03 /BONITA, CALIF. 9200.
April 10, 1992
To Whom It May Concern;
The ten member Board of Directors of the Chula Vista Men's Club
voted to give its support to the proposed green fee rate structure offered
by American Golf. The Board of Directors is especially appreciative of the
exemotion given to Chula Vista residents and Men's and Women's Club
members who will not be affected by the proposed increase. We feel this
is due in large part to the support given by our members to American Golf
over the past several years. The Board also is pleased with the fact that
the Junior and Senior rate structures will not be affected by the increase.
It is our hope that this increase will allow American Golf Corporation to
continue its overall course improvement and beautification plans.
Sincerely,
rpdd./ J)u~
James Hanson
Secretary
Chula Vista Men's Club
\\-\~
';J';~;,;::,~T
Attachment D
AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION.
7 APRIL 1992
Jess Valenzuela
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks and Recreation Department
276 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Dear Mr. Valenzuela:
Per your request, the following additional information is
being provided in support of the correspondence sent to you
on 23 March 1992 regarding revision of the existing green fee
rate structure at the Chula Vista Golf Course:
A. $8.00 ANNUAL RESIDENT CARD
Residency verification will be based on the
following documents:
1) Driver's License
2) Utility Bills (indicating Chula Vista tax
w/Bonita address)
3) Zoning Map
B. 1991 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND REPAIRS
Irrigation Well
Channel Repair
Underground Fuel Tank Clean-up
$ 21,184
19,255
28,749
Total:
$ 69,188
C. 1991 DEFERRED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
We received permission from the city of Chula Vista
in August 1991 to redirect our funding for
rebuilding a green to repair the excessive channel
erosion caused by spring rains. Such repair enabled
the golfing public to enjoy maximum days of play.
D. 1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND REPAIRS
Driving Range Netting
Channel Repair
Fuel Tank (Continued Clean-up)
Rebuild #13 Green
$ 10,000
8,000
36,000
30,000
--------
Total:
$ 84,000
\\~~
.
,
E. CHULA VISTA MEN'S AND LADIES' CLUB SUPPORT OF PROPOSED
RATE INCREASE
Current response is good and we anticipate full
approval and support from both Clubs.
Your support and consideration in this matter has been
greatly appreciated. Please contact me at 469-6406 if
further information is needed.
Ernest B. eisendorff III
American Golf Corporation
San Diego Regional Director
7380 Golfcrest Place
San Diego, CA 92119
CC: Jerry Foncerrada
\\ ... \S
,
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item I 2-
Meeting Date 05/05/92
ITEM TITLE: Resolution: l \P 1.1 4 Approving an Agreement between the City of Chula
Vista and Mr. Mario Torero for the Chula Vista Mural Program - Phase I
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Parks & Recreatio~
REVIEWED BY:
City Manage~
(4/5th Vote: Yes_NolO
In November of 1988, City Council requested staff investigate the possibility of developing a program
which would use murals to replace graffiti in certain areas of the City, due to an increase in graffiti
vandalism. Since that time, funding has been received, an artist selected, and staff is prepared to
proceed with the anti-graffiti mural program. This report provides Council with an overview of how
this program will proceed in the next several months.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the Resolution and authorize the Mayor to execute
the Agreement on behalf of the City.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On January 14, 1992, the Cultural Arts
Commission met in a regular meeting and discussed the Mural Program. The Commission voted
unanimously to support the Mural Program, and to support the selection of the muralist as
recommended by a citizen selection committee.
DISCUSSION: On May 4, 1990, the Department informed the Council that funds were being
requested from the FY 90191 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program to pay for a
mural program. This request was in response to Council's interest in developing a program which
would use murals to replace graffiti in Community Development Block Grant eligible areas of the
City. Through the CDBG funding review process, the Commission on Aging supported the murals
concept, and recommended funding the program through CDBG monies (Attachment "A").
The Department received a CDBG allocation of $15,500 for the murals program. These funds will
be utilized to hire a professional muralist and purchase art supplies for two murals. The muralist will
serve as a mentor to junior and senior high school artists. Students will be recruited from areas
where the program is targeted.
A Request For Qualification (RFQ) was sent out soliciting artist submittals for this project. A special
ad-hoc committee of the Cultural Arts Commission worked with staff to set up the criteria for
applications and qualifications for the desired muralist (Attachment "B").
Three potential candidates responded to the RFQ. An independent community review panel was
then formed to review the RFQ's and conduct an oral interview with each artist. The panel was
comprised of a local artist, a member of the Chula Vista Art Guild and two area businessmen who
sit on the Otay Committee.
(muralrpt}
1
\1-\
Item 12-
Meeting Date 05/05/92
Based on the materials submitted, and the artists' presentations, the selection committee (with the
assistance of staff) recommended to the Cultural Arts Commission that Mr. Mario Torero be
commissioned to provide the necessary art work for the proposed two murals. The Cultural Arts
Commission reviewed the recommendation on January 14, 1992, and voted unanimously to support
the selection committees recommendation (Attachment "C").
The City and the Artist will enter into an Agreement (Attachment "D") specifying the Artist must
comply with the following criteria for the mural development process:
1. The Artist shall recommend mural site locations that are within the
CDBG eligible areas that are approved by the Police Department, Park and
Recreation Department, and the Cultural Arts Commission.
2. Compilation of photographs, drawings, models, or designs of proposed art work.
3. Development of all material and colors.
4. Site plan to include photographs of the site and the surrounding neighborhood;
drawings of the site to be at project scale.
5. Establishment of a work plan to include time frame for project planning.
6. Identifying a date and duration of installation, providing an installation schedule.
7. Adherence to budget.
8. Verification of insurance sufficient to meet the requirements of City's Risk Manager.
9. Cleaning and security deposit to guarantee restoration of the site to its original
condition, if applicable.
10. Adherence to encroachment permits, if applicable.
11. Compliance to recommended anti-graffiti coating.
The Agreement between the City and the Artist also includes notification and presentations to the
communities in which the murals will occur. This will include the Artist's conceptual drawings, and
the opportunity for the community to provide input into the art that will appear in their
neighborhood. After the first conceptual drawings, the Artist will return to the community with final
drawings that will include their suggestions. The Artist will be required to complete the project
within six months of the execution of the Agreement. The Agreement will also provide for an Option
to extend the Artist's Agreement for additional murals if funding becomes available, and the project
performance is acceptable to all parties. When all these conditions are met, staff will return to the
City Council for consideration of an extension to the Artist's Agreement.
Following the community meetings, the Artist will provide a presentation to the Cultural Arts
Commission which will include the final drawings. Upon approval by the Cultural Arts Commission,
a report will be submitted to the City Council with recommendations for implementation of the
project.
The selected artist, Mario Acevedo Torero, is a San Diego resident .with a long history of successful
mural projects not only in California, but across the country. His major mural projects include several
in the downtown San Diego area, as well as mural projects in Texas, Minnesota and Oregon. He has
(muralrpt)
2
\~:.. )..
Item -' "-
Meeting Date 05/05192
received numerous grants and awards, and has done extensive work in areas prone to extreme graffiti
in the San Diego area. Attached to this report are visual examples of Mr. Torero's work in San
Diego. Mr. Torero completed a mural project at Otay Elementary School a number of years ago,
which is still in existence at the school site. He is currently serving as a commissioner on the City of
San Diego's Commission of Arts and Culture, and has teaching experience with the San Diego City
Schools, San Diego City College, and San Diego State University. Mr. Torero has also been
commissioned to paint murals in Holland and Japan. .
FISCAL IMPACT: $15,500 has been previously appropriated for the project from the Community
Development Block Grant Program. There is no additional fiscal impact to the City or the General
Fund in FY 91/92.
Attachment "A"
Attachment "B"
Attachment "C"
Attachment "D"
Commission on Aging minutes /I/"r Si!h';N"E-(j
Request for Qualification (examples of Artist's work)lII"r5i!.MN~P
Cultural Arts Commission minutes Nt,.r SttA-fo/N.GP
Agreement between City and Artist
{muralrpt]
3
\'].-3/1,. -11./
c:~
?
,.~.,."".... .'"
Attachment A
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
COMMISSION ON AGING
April 11, 1990
3:00 P. M.
Parks and Recreation
Conference Room
************************
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
SILENT PRAYER
MEMBERS PRESENT:
chair Helton, commissioners Dennison, Grindle,
Gilstrap, Hagedorn, Stokes, Scrivener
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of March 14, 1990 were approved as
distributed.
MSUC STOKES/GRINDLE 7-0
2. COMMUNICATIONS
a. Chair's Comments
Chair Helton shared highlights of her experiences at the
Conference she recently attended in San Francisco, and passed
out information on a variety of subjects which she felt would
be of interest to the Commissioners.
b. Commissioners' Comments
Commissioner Dennison gave a report on the Health Aspects of
the San Francisco Conference.
c. Oral Communications
Secretary Stohr stated that Council needs to know who will be
accepting the proclamation for Older Americans Month.
Due to Chair Helton's absence from the City, Vice Chair
Gilstrap will accept this proclamation.
d. writteh communications
Secretary Stohr read a letter regarding the RSVP program which
had been referred to the Commission by Human Services
Coordinator Castro, for their information. It is the feeling
of the Commission that no action is necessary on this matter.
\J-. - L\
.~
3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. CDBG
The Commission on Aging approved the following recommendations
to Council on CDBG funding. .
Adult Protective Services
Many of their clients are unable
transportation
$12,000
to use public
Altrusa Club of Chula vista
No duplication of services
utilities
$6,000
- money needed to pay rent and
Centro de la Salud Communidad
No program in place - duplication of services
-0-
City of Chula vista I & R Center
Appropriate level of CDBG support
$9,400
Council of Pilipino/American Organizations -0-
Serves only a small portion of the population - No effort
to reach out to the community at large
Episcopal/otay Community Clinic
Provides a vital service to the Community
Episcopal/Alcohol Recovery
Did not extend to Montgomery as promised
$15,000
$10,000
Girls/Boys Club -0-
The Commission feels that this could paid for by parents
Jobs for Youth $3,100
Lutheran Social Services $15,000
They lost other funding this year
MAAC Project -0-
They already have transportation
Senior Adult Services $4,500
They have a demonstrated need for this funding
South Bay community Service $9,000
This c~vers basic needs within the organization
South Bay Family YMCA-Sunshine Co. $20,000
South Bay Family YMCA-Summer Day Camp
Good quality program due to expertise of the
SUHSD/FEA
$10,000
Director
-0-
\J, .c;
--~-'""',;,~-,,~'~;;::-';::;~t:7;,~::~:;:'"*;.~ii-~jJ-r - .'
Duplication of services
vista Hill Foundation
Increased hours of therapy for all ages
$17,500
Woodlawn Park community Center
Everyone who comes in is helped-serves
functions
$22,500
many different
YMCA Human Development Center
Chula vista P & R
$20,000
$15,500
Kinesis South, Mental Health -0-
Employment funds should be available to this program
South County Council on Aging
To supplement state funding
$5,000
$18,000
San Diego Resident Relations
Motion to accept the above recommendations
MSUC STOKES/DENNISON 7-0
b. Human Services council Uodate
Commissioner Scrivener expressed her enjoyment of the recent
Human Services Council Forum, as did Commissioner Grindle.
Commissioner Dennison reminded the Commission that the main
reason for the Forums is to bring the providers together to
encourage cooperation and avoid fighting over turf.
c. Norman Park Center Uodate
Recreation supervisor Beardsley stated it is currently
estimated that the temporary facility will be available for
occupancy by the end of June. The county has been given
notice that they must vacate the site by May 15. They are
currently in the process of another space for their health
facility.
d. Drua Abuse Committee Uodate
There will be a Drug Abuse Forum on April 19, 1990 at Norman
Park Center. Commissioner Dennison is also working with a
substance abuse task force from the Veterans Hospital in San
Diego. They are having a forum on June 5thr it will be an all
day session. There is no charge. She encourages all of the
Commissioners to attend this forum.
e. Centenarian Committee
\"2. -Ie,
"::1;;,'{!r<fllIl"""'''''.i~~:r .""""""""''''''''''
Recreation Supervisor Beardsley reported that she has compiled
a partial list of Centenarians but has other sources to access
for additional names.
f. Brochure Committee Uodate
Recreation Supervisor Beardsley reported that when she went to
pick up the brochures, she discovered a printer error. The
printer is re-doing them at his expense, however, there will
be a delivery delay due to this error.
4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NONE
5. STAFF REPORT
Recreation Supervisor Beardsley reported on new books and
publications that have been received for the senior library.
Meeting adj ourned to the regularly scheduled meeting of May 9,
1990.
Submitted by:
~.1#Jv
\
\J,. - 1
....~.,,,'^-.._ 0'-.
. .
.
~~~
~
- --
~- ~
Attachment B (J 0 p , .
I
r::'
-.-
,
CI1Y OF
CHULA VISTA
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
May 29, 1991
SUBJECT: Murals Program
Dear Artist:
REOUEST FOR OUALIFICATIONS
The city of Chula vista CUltural Arts commission and Parks and
Recreation Department are seeking artists qualified to design, and
paint two murals in the City's Community Development Block Grant
eligible areas. '-
The mural is to be original, novel and non-commercial, yet
representative of the cultural arts significance of the Chula Vista
area. The artist will be required to work with selected youth from
the high school district. It is the intent of this program to
create a work of art in the City and minimize the incidence of
graffiti in the given area. Fifteen thousand five hundred dollars
($15,500) is available for the total budget (including artist fees)
for the two mural sites.
SUBMISSION REOUIREMENTS. REOUEST FOR OUALIFICATIONS lRFO\
.
A selection panel of art experts and CUltural Arts Commissioners
will be assembled to review all responses to the RFQ. Interviews
with all applicants will subsequently be conducted by the
subcommittee, and one finalist will be selected. Their
recommendation will be forwarded to the CUltural Arts Commission
and Parks and Recreation Department. The CUltural Arts Commission
will make their recommendation to City Council for approval of the
artist. Proposals will consist of project drawings with written
and budgetary narratives. The final selection of one artist will
be used for both mural sites. Subject to final approval by the
Chula Vista City Council, the mural project is expected to commence
by early Summer.
All applicants must submit:
1. Ten slides, of past appropriate artwork. Priority will be
given to artists who can demonstrate actual experience with
murals. Slides must be individually labeled with artist's
name media, date and dimensions. (If return of slides is
desired, a self addressed stamped envelope must be included.
Slides retained will become part of the public art slide
registry. )
.
,~-i
276 FOL'RTH AVENUElCHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 920101(619) 691-5071
~
. .
, .
Mt1RALS PROGRAM
2
May 28, 1991
2. CUrrent resume.
3. An optional statement or letter of interest Day be included.
ALL APPLICATIONS MUST BE RECEIVED OR POSTMARKED BY JUNE 21, 1991.
Send to: John Gates
Chula Vista Mural Project
City of Chula Vista CUltural Arts Commission
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Failure to follow all of the above requirements will disqualify an
entry. All entries received after the submission deadline will be
returned unopened.
Sincerely,
(k-f,$1~'itu/4..
Jess Valentuela, Director
Department of Parks and Recreation
ARnruRAL.491
\
\2.-~
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
'-;'m2W.''''''~--~'--
Attachment C
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION
Tuesday, 5:00 p.m.
January 14, 1992
Conference Rooms 2 & 3
Public Services Building
......................
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chair souval, commissioners Ables, Gerber,
McAllister, McGovern, Soriano-Cernitz, Scott,
and Torres
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Commissioner Dumlao
STAFF PRESENT:
Staff Liaisons Gates, McMartin and Valenzuela
Chair Souval introduced and welcomed the newly appointed CUltural
Arts Commissioner, Melody Soriano-Cernitz.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of December 10, 1991 were approved.
MSUC [Torres/Mcallister] 8-0.
2. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Formulating Strategies/Sub-Committee Reports
The Sub-Committees have completed their meetings with
Mary Powers. All the information is being combined for
the Commission's goals and objectives. .
b. Chula Vista Arts Directory - Funding
A fundIng request was sent to the Chamber of Commerce,
however, no response has been received yet. Friends of
the Library have committed $750 to assist in the cost of
printing the Directory.
.~ ".
,','
,.!.
\). -I 0
",
.
CUltural Arts Commission
Meeting Minutes
c. CUltural Arts Festival Sub-Committee Report
2
January 14, 1992
A public meeting has been scheduled for January 30, 7:00
p.m. in the City Council Chambers inviting anyone
interested in volunteering to assist with the Festival.
Mr. Perkins will present a work plan. The Festival is
scheduled for May, 1992.
e. Murals Program -
The Citizen Selection Committee have completed their
interviews. The Committee's Murals Program artist
recommendation is Mario Torero. The Murals Program Sub-
Committee and staff endorsed the Citizens Sub-Committee's
recommendation.
Commissioner Torres, representing the Murals Sub-
Committee, felt there should be further discussion
indicating the Commission's emphasis on the mural design
theme. This particular aspect has not been discussed
with the artist.
The Request for Proposal did indicate the artist would be
working with the community on establishing a theme. The
purpose of the murals program was to serve as a graffiti
abatement program in a community Development Block Grant
area. Based on that information, the artist would work
with students and serve as a mentor to develop a mural,
no criteria on the design was set.
Parks & Recreation Director Valenzuela reported the Parks
& Recreation Department are requesting additional Capital
Improvement Project Community Development Block Grant
Funds to continue the murals program through 1996.
Staff Liaison McMartin suggested to the Commission to
videotape and document the entire murals program process.
Ace Frazier, who has a contract with the City that
includes working within the City of Chula vista, could
video the process once it is underway. The Commissioners
were very interested and asked Ms. Martin to contact Mr.
Frazier.
The Cbmmission agreed to keep a close ~nvolvement
throughout the entire process of the Murals Program.
MSUC [MCAllisterlsoriano-cernitz] 8-0, based upon the
results of the sub-Committee's recommendation, the
Cultural Arts Commission approved the selection of Mario
Torrero as the murals program artist contingent upon
background references and final contract discussion.
,
/2-ll
-:;S':X:"~<__}',,:C;;it.';i:,(K"","""
cultural Arts commission
Meeting Minutes
f. Mccandliss Memorial cultural Arts Fund
3
January 14, 1992
The Sub-committee has made contact with potential people
to serve on Gayle McCandliss Memorial CUltural Arts Fund
Sub-Committee. The first meeting has not been
scheduled.
The CUltural Arts Commission also suggested the Sub-
Committee include representatives of the Community. The
Sub-committee's task is to develop the criteria to be
used to assist in the selection process to nominate an
individual for an annual award.
f. Cultural Arts Coordinator
The request to the City council to approve a full time
CUltural Arts Coordinator has been continued to the
council meeting date of January 21. Chair Souval asked
the Commission to assist by attending the council meeting
with their support and through written correspondence
from members of the community.
This item was not on the agenda, however the Commission agreed to
include:
g. Bayfront
The consultant's findings were that a cultural arts
center in the 900-1200 seat capacity range was very
feasible for the City of Chula Vista and that the
Bayfront was a suitable venue for two reasons: 1) access
to freeway and 2) neutral territory.
The Bayfront Sub-Committee was formally disbanded. The
city Council is voting on the concept of the Bayfront
plan and a cultural Arts Center site is included in the
proposal.
Commissioner Ables asked that on the next CUltural Arts
Agenda the commission consider the possibility of forming
their own CUltural Arts Center Sub-Committee and include
members of the general public.
3. NEW BUSINES~
a. Commission Budget - Fiscal Year 1992-93
The city is in the budget process for FY 1992-93. Under
the direction of the Budget Manager, little or no
increases are expected. In addition, 1% to 2% cuts are
being investigated.
\').....\~
CUltural Arts Commission
Meeting Minutes
4
January 14, 1992
4. COMMUNICATIONS
a. Oral communications - None.
b. Written Communications - CALAA Workshop is scheduled for
March, 1992. Chair Souval will distribute the
information at the next meeting.
c. Commissioners' Remarks - None.
5. STAFF REPORT - None.
Meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled
meeting of February 11, 1992 at 5:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
...~"'~~~
Elizabeth Bottorff
,
l;t - \~
RESOLUTION NO.-ll-~\~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND MR. MARIO TORERO FOR
THE CHULA VISTA MURAL PROGRAM - PHASE I, AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAME
WHEREAS, in November of 1988, City Council requested
staff investigate the possibility of developing a program which
would use murals to replace graffiti in certain areas of the City,
due to an increase in graffiti vandalism; and
WHEREAS, since that time, funding has been received, an
artist selected and staff is prepared to proceed with the anti-
graffiti mural program; and
WHEREAS, on January 14, 1992, the Cultural Arts
Commission voted unanimously to support the Mural Program, and to
support the selection of the muralist as recommended by a citizen
selection committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby approve an Agreement between
the City of Chula vista and Mr. Mario Torero for the Chula vista
Mural Program - Phase I, a copy of which is on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and irected to execute said
agreement for and on behalf of the city
Jess Valenzuela, Director of
Parks and Recreation
r V"1
Presented by
C:\rs\torero
1;2.-IS; /" -Ib
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OP
CHULA VISTA AND MARIO TORERO POR TWO MURALS
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this May 4, 1992, by and
between the City of Chula Vista, hereinafter referred to as "City"
and, MARIO TORERO hereinafter referred to as the "ARTIST."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista, with the advice of the Chula
vista Cultural Arts Commission is desirous of obtaining at least
two original mural painting. and the ootion to obtain more as
fundina oermi ts. which will be visual representations of the
diversity and history of the City of Chula vista and the purposes
of which are to prevent the proliferation of graffiti and promote
the cultural awareness of the City's residents; and
WHEREAS, City's DIRECTOR of Parks and Recreation (hereafter
Director) obtained CDBG grant funds in the amount of $15,500 for
this purpose.
WHEREAS, cityie has completed the Request for Qualification
process which has resulted in selection by Director, with the
advise of Cultural Arts Commission, (hereafter CAC) of Artist and,
WHEREAS, MARIO TORERO is an artist with special experience and
qualifications to design and execute said mural paintings.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual
promises, covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties
hereto agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK
A. The ARTIST shall design and create 2 original mural
paintings (hereinafter referred to as "the Work") for the
ci ty of Chula vista. and. at the ootion of the city
("Ootion"). to be exercised bY the city Manaaer in
writina and uoon his discretion. and uoon a findina bY
the city Manaaer that sufficient funds are available and
aoorooriated for such ouroose. ARTIST shall desian and
create at least 5 additional mural oaintinas ("ootion
Work") of the size. comolexity and auality of the laraest
and most comolex of the two oaintinas which are the
subiect matter of the Work. on the same terms and
conditions herein set forth for the Work. exceot that.
uoon exercise of the ootion bY the city. the orice for
each shall be $7.250. Nothina herein shall oreclude.
until one or the other declares an imoasse. from
neaotiatina a different orice or different oiece of
\:1-- '1
ootion Work: however. uoon declaration of imoasse. the
Artist shall oerform the ootion Work if and to the extent
the ootion is exercised bv citv. Where "Work" is herein
referred to. it shall also refer to the "Ootion Work" if.
and to the extent the ootion is exercised.
B. The ARTIST shall recommend mural site locations that are
within CDBG eligible areas that are deemed by the police
Department to be in areas of high graffiti incidents and
that are then approved by the Park and Recreation
Department and Cultural Arts Commission.
C. The Work shall be eer~ified ~y ~he ARTIST as unique for
the chosen sites, shall not be substantially duplicated
for or from any other site, and shall be a faithful
rendition of the design submitted by the ARTIST in
his/her proposal.
D. The ARTIST shall hold public meetings to review ARTIST'S
suggested mural renderings and seek public input.
E. The community in which the mural will be painted will
provide its recommendation to the ARTIST, who will then
bring that recommendation forward to the CAC.
F. The ARTIST shall make a visual presentation to the
Director and the CAC specifying the design of Work,
within one month of the execution of this agreement.
Said presentation shall include:
1. Photographs, drawings, models, or designs of
proposed art work
2. Materials and colors
3. Si te plan, to include photographs of si te and
neighborhood, drawings of the site with project to
scale
4. Date and duration of installation, providing
installation schedule
5. Budget
6. Proof of insurance sufficient to meet the
requirements of the City's Risk Manager
7. Cleaning and security deposit to guarantee
restoration of site to original condition, if
applicable
8. Building permit, if necessary
G.
wi thin two weeks of ARTIST'S presentation to CAC and
DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR (with the advice of CAC) shall notify
ARTIST in writing of (a) proposed design changes or (b)
acceptance of designs. If design changes are proposed,
ARTIST will properly respond and re-submit to DIRECTOR
(and CAC). Upon design approval, DIRECTOR shall promptly
schedule for Council approval. ARTIST shall be prepared
to proceed with execut~n of the WORK in accordance with
III.Iral1.wp
\2.4 \8"
the approved designs, following City Council approval
(approximately one month following initial presentation
to DIRECTOR (and CAC). Attachment 1&2 will be completed
at this time.
H. The ARTIST shall be responsible for conducting all
research including meeting with the community of Chula
Vista; assembling all photographic documentary materials;
initialing and completing the design of the mural
painting; and the actual production and completion of the
mural painting.
I. The ARTIST shall also design and execute sponsorship
credits to be publicly displayed and identified with the
Work in a form, size and configuration which is subject
to the approval of the DIRECTOR with advice from the CAC.
Said signature shall include the ARTIST's name, the title
of the Work, date of installation, and sources of
financial support for the project.
J. The ARTIST shall submit to the DIRECTOR a recommended
anti-graffiti coating product that will protect the
murals. Upon DIRECTOR approval ARTIST shall apply
product following the manufacturer guidelines.
2. COMPLETION OF THE WORK
The ARTIST agrees to complete the Work within six months from
the date of execution of this Agreement, and the ootion Work
within three months from the date of exercise of the ootion
for each additional mural which is the sub;ect matter of the
exercise of Ootion. in accordance with the schedule for
completion (Attachment 2).
If the ARTIST is delayed at any time in the progress of the
Work by any act or neglect of the City, incomplete building
modifications to the site, or by labor disputes, fire, unusual
delay in transportation, adverse weather conditions not
reasonably anticipated, unavoidable causes, or any causes
beyond the ARTIST's control or any cause which the City
determines justifies the delay, then the completion date will
be extended by DIRECTOR by written notice for such reasonable
time as the parties may determine. The ARTIST will be given
a reasonable amount of time not to exceed two months to meet
any modifications of the design, if necessary.
If the progress of the Hwork is delayed by any fault, neglect,
act or failure of the ARTIST, or by any of his/her employees,
or by any separate contractor or subcontractor employed by the
ARTIST, then the ARTIST shall, 'at his/her own expense, work
such overtime or take whatever action as may be required to
make up for time lost and to avoid delay in completing the
Work within the agreed upon time.
oural1.wp 3
/2. -IG
The Artist warrants that the Work will be free of defects in
workmanship or materials, including inherent vice, and that
the Artist will, at the Artist's own expense, remedy any
defects due to faulty workmanship or materials, ,and will
perform maintenance substantially in excess of the routine
maintenance described in the recommendations provided by the
Artist to the City without further compensation. If the Work
should deteriorate because of an inherent vice between one and
three years from the date the Work is finally accepted by the
City, the Artist will promptly repair or replace the Work for
the cost of materials and supplies. "Inherent vice" refers to
a quality within the material or materials which comprise the
Work which, either alone or in combination, results in the
tendency of the Work to destroy itself.
All risk of destruction, or damage to, the Work or any part
thereof from any cause whatsoever shall be borne by the Artist
until delivery, installation and written acceptance of the
Work by the City. The Artist, at his/her expense, shall
rebuild, repair, restore, and make good all such damage to any
portion of the Work.
3. AMOUNT AND MANNER OF PAYMENT
In consideration of satisfactory performance of the Work
specified herein, the City shall pay the ARTIST a fixed sum of
fifteen thousand five hundred dollars ($15,500) as follows:
PHASE I:
Ten percent (10%) on acceptance of
proposal and execution of this
agreement, $1,550.
PHASE III:
Twenty percent (20%) on ARTIST'S
presentation of the proposal and design
to the DIRECTOR AND CAC, $3,100.
Fifty percent (50%) to be paid following
DIRECTOR, CAC and Council approval of
design, for the acquisition of
materials/supplies and the start of
fabrication of the murals, $7,750.
PHASE II:
PHASE IV:
Twenty percent (20%) to be paid upon
acceptance of the finished Work, as
determined by the DIRECTOR of Parks and
Recreation with the advice of the CAC,
$3,100.
FOllowing completion of each phase as designated above, the
ARTIST shall submit an invoice directed to the attention of the
Parks and Recreation Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista,
California 91910.
IIJral1.wp
4
12.. -~
4. RIGHT. TITLE AND INTEREST TO THE WORK
The City shall have the right to graphically reproduce the art
produced by the ARTIST solely for the purposes of publicity or
exhibition, provided that such reproduction is credited to
the ARTIST per the California Art Preservation Act copyright
Law.
The ARTIST shall not make any public information release in
connection with services performed under this Agreement
without the prior written permission of the CITY.
The ARTIST, as part of the CONTRACT, and without additional
compensation may be required by the CITY to discuss the
project with the general public and/or press/media
representatives in special meetings scheduled for this
purpose.
Upon final payment to the ARTIST, all right, title and
interest to the Work shall become vested in the city of Chula
vista except as specified herein. The ARTIST will retain all
right, title and interest to any designs which are rejected by
the City, as well as any incidental designs resulting from the
Work.
The ARTIST reserves to him/herself all copyrights in the Work,
the preliminary design, and any incidental works made in the
creation of the Work.
5. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE
ARTIST shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the city, its
elected and appointed officers, and employees from and against
all claims for demands, liability, cost and expense (including
without limitation attorney's fees), arising out of the con-
duct of the ARTIST, or any agent or employee, subcontractors,
or others in connection with the execution of the work covered
by this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from
the sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the City, its
officers, or employees. ARTIST'S indemnification shall in-
clude any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and liabil-
ity incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees
in defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to
judgment or not. Further, ARTIST at his own expense shall,
upon written request by the city, defend any such suit or
action brought against the city , its off icers, agents, or
employee. ARTIST'S indemnification of City shall not be
limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the ARTIST.
ARTIST represents that he and his agents, staff and sub-
consultants employed by it, in connection with the Services
required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of
IIUr.ll.wp
5
\~.?- \
loss by the following insurance coverages, in the following
categories, and to the limits specified, policies of which are
issued by Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A,
Class V" or better, or shall meet with the approval of the
City:
statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's
Liability Insurance coverage in the amount of
$1,000,000.00.
commercial General Liability Insurance including Business
Automobile Insurance coverage in the amount of
$1,000,000.00, combined single limit applied separately
to each project away from premises owned or rented by
Consultant, which names city and Applicant as an
Additional Insured, and which is primary to any policy
which the city may otherwise carry ("Primary coverage"),
and which treats the employees of the City and Applicant
in the same manner as members of the general public
("Cross-liability Coverage).
ARTIST shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein
required, prior to the commencement of services required
under the Agreement, by delivery of certificates of
Insurance demonstrating same, and further indicating that
the policies may not be canceled without at least thirty
(30) days written notice to the Additional Insured. City
has other valid and collectible insurance for a loss
covered by this policy, that other insurance shall be
excess only." Said policy or policies shall provide that
City shall be given thirty (30) days written notice to
the Additional Insured.
In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured, Covered,
Primary coverage and Cross-liability Coverage required
under ARTIST I S Commercial General Liability Insurance
Policy, demonstrating same, which shall be reviewed and
approved by the Risk Manager.
The ARTIST shall be responsible for all Federal and State
income taxes on the amount of this CONTRACT, as well as
any state sales tax which might be required. The ARTIST
agrees that no charges or claim for damages shall be made
by him for any delays or hindrances beyond the control of
the CITY during the progress of any portion of the
services specified in this CONTRACT. Such delays or
hindrances, if any, shall be compensated by an extension
of time for such reasonable period as may be mutually
agreed between parties. It is understood, however, that
permitting the ARTIST to proceed to complete any
services, or any part of them, after the date to which
the time of completion may have been extended, shall in
IlJrell.wp
6
~-"2...
L)
no way act as a waiver on the part of the CITY or any of
its legal rights herein.
6. ALTERATIONS. REPAIRS. RESTORATIONS OR TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP-
WAIVER OF ATTRIBUTION AND INTEGRITY RIGHTS
If the City determines to make repairs or restoration to the
murals, the ARTIST, if reasonably available, shall be
informed and consulted in regard to all repairs and
restoration of the Work subsequent to its installation~
without additional charae to the citv exceot as mav be
consented to bv the citv. The ARTIST shall be allowed to
recommend restorative techniques and materials, and shall be
given the opportunity to submit proposals for any such repairs
and restoration for an appropriate fee.
ARTIST hereby acknowledges that the w~ork (the two mural
paintings) will be applied to the exterior walls of
building/structure and therefor its installation will subject
the Work to destruction, mutilation or other modification by
reason of removal. ARTIST hereby WAIVES, and/or ACKNOWLEDGES
the non-existence of, the Rights of Attribution and Integrity
provided by 17 USC section 106 A (a) (2) and (3). ARTIST
understands that neither CITY nor the owner of the property to
which the murals are applied have any obligation to notify
ARTIST of intention to remove, and ARTIST does not have the
right to remove the work or pay for its removal within 90 days
of notice.
7. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR-DIRECTOR/CITY TORERO/ARTIST
The City's Contract Administrator shall be the Director of
Parks and Recreation who is authorized by said party to
represent them in routine administration of this agreement.
Any required notices shall be sent to the CITY'S Contract
Administrator with the following address:
Director of Parks and Recreation
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91910
ARTIST'S Contract Administrator shall be MARIO TORERO to whom
any required notices shall be sent at the following address:
Mario Torero
4212 Florida Street
San Diego, CA 92104
8. GOVERNING LAW
IIJrell.wp
7
D.-;2. ';
Unless agreed otherwise in writing by the parties, the terms
and provisions of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws
of the state of California.
9. NON-DISCRIMINATION
ARTIST agrees to comply with the requirements of non-discrimi-
nation and equal opportunity laws which provide that no person
will, on the basis of sex, age, religion, race, color, natio-
nal origin, or handicap, be excluded from participation in, be
denied benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any
part of the execution and fulfillment of this Agreement.
10. TERMINATION
Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause if the
other party fails to perform any material obligation
hereunder. In addition to any damages due to city in the
event of ARTIST'S breach, if the ARTIST abandons the Work,
defaults on any material term of this agreement or otherwise
causes it to be terminated without cause prior to final
acceptance of the Work, the ARTIST shall not be owed or paid
any further compensation by the City.
11. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement represents the entire Agreement of the parties
and may not be amended unless agreed to in writing and
certified by the signatures of the parties hereunder. This
Agreement may be extended to include additional murals upon a
mutual agreement by the Artist and the city, and all terms and
conditions of this Agreement would be in effect, unless
otherwise amended.
(End of Page. Next Page is Signature Page.)
ouroll.wp 8
I;l..-;tl\
Signature Page to
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AND MARIO TORERO POR TWO MURALS
Now therefore, the parties hereto, having read and understood
the terms and conditions of this agreement, do hereby express their
consent to the terms hereof by setting their hand hereto on the
date set forth adjacent thereto.
Dated: April 30, 1992
city' of Chula vista
by:
Tim Nader, its Mayor
Attest:
(Execution Authorized by Reso. No. ____l
Beverly Authelet
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
Dated: April 30, 1992
by:
Mario Torrero, Artist
ourall.wp
9
\~-l~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item \ ~
Meeting Date 5/51'12
SUBMllllill BY:
Report: Parks and Recreation ~~ljlftment Three Year Strategic Plan
Director of Parks and Recreatio~
City Manag1f' (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No X)
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
As part of the Department's long range planning efforts, a Three Year Strategic Plan has been
prepared to guide the Department's future and the community's parks and recreation services. The
Strategic Plan was developed by staff in October, 1991. It is the Department's intent to present the
Draft Strategic Plan to the City Council and request support for the Plan and its importance to the
city's future.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the report.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: At the November 21, 1991 Parks and
Recreation Commission meeting, the Department presented the draft Strategic Plan to the
Commission and the Commission voted 4-0 to accept the Plan and support the Department's effort
in its achievement.
DISCUSSION: Chula Vista is undergoing a tremendous amount of community change. Recent
census data has highlighted major demographical shifts in the community within the past ten years.
Population growth, increasing need for park, open space and recreation facilities and the emergence
of competing special interest groups has placed constant demands on our workforce.
The Department has been forced to work smarter rather than harder. Supervisors and line staff have
relied on more efficient ways to get the job done with limited time and resources. This has ranged
from becoming more sophisticated in growing technologies such as the use of computers, reorganizing
work units to achieve better customer service capabilities, and establishing cooperative relationships
with the private sector to expand or create new programs.
Recently, our staff embarked on a program that defined past accomplishments and areas of concern,
existing conditions and future trends. The outcome of this effort is a Department draft Strategic Plan.
When finalized, this plan will establish a long range parks and recreation vision for the future. In
formulating this plan, employees were selected from all work units to attend a two-day planning
session. Obviously, not everyone had the opportunity to attend the retreat. However, to maximize
employee input, a series of post retreat focus groups were conducted to include everyone in this
planning process.
The employees received information on the various external influences and internal influences that
were affecting the Department in some way. For example, discussion material included the strategies
that were identified by Chula Vista 2000 and Chula Vista 21, the City Council's major projects for
[straplan}
1
\ ~ ~ \
Item \~
Meeting Date 05/05/92
the Department, the Department's goals and objectives, census data and certain projects identified
by the City Manager.
Employees were divided into groups to analyze the various issues. The information was then
compiled, and formatted into a three year work plan. The more significant projects (three years or
longer) were placed on a list and identified as important but not readily achievable within the three
year time frame. Of special significance was the inclusion in the Plan of the existing planning efforts
in the area of cultural arts and child care.
Following the above described steps, the draft Plan was distributed to all Departments for critique,
and Parks and Recreation received favorable comments. In preparing the Department's budget
request for FY 92/93, the Strategic Plan was used as an outline. The Department believes the
Strategic Plan is a workable and useful tool and staff looks forward to working internally and the
other City Departments and affected agencies to effect the implementation of the Plan. It is the
Department's intent to review the Plan periodically to analyze for modifications to reflect shifting
interests in the Plan's subject areas. The draft Strategic Plan is attached.
FISCAL IMPACf: None at present. As the plan is implemented in the future, components of the
plan which require funding or policy determination, will be brought to the City Council for
consideration.
Attachments
['lraplan]
2
\ ~.')... /13 "''I
Minutes of a
Regular Meeting of the
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Thursday 6:00 p.m.
November 21, 1991
Public Services Building
Conference Room 1
*******************
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS EXCUSED:
MEMBER ABSENT:
Commissioners, Hall, Und, Roland, Willett
Commissioners Carpenter, Sandova/-Femandez
Commissioner Helton
1. APPROVAL OF MINlffES
The minutes of the meeting of October 24, 1991 were approved as distributed.
MSC WILLETT/LIND 4-0
2. PUBUC HEARINGS OR REMARKS
NONE
3. DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director Valenzuela gave a progress report on the Rohr Park Renovation Project
and advised the Commissioners that the project would probably be completed in
December provided there were no further unforseen delays.
He further updated the Commissioners on the Marina View Park Renovation
Project and commented on the high quality of the contractor on that project.
The Director commented on the success of recent holiday activities such as the
Halloween Haunted House in Rohr Manor, and gave the Commissioners an
oveNiew of upcoming Winter Holiday activities such as Santa's Holiday Village
and North Pole Calling.
Commissioner Willett commented that he would like to see more of the activities
and events that are chronicled in the Commission's newsletter highlighted in the
media such as the Chula Vista Star News.
The Commission discussed various ways of obtaining better media coverage for
\~"3
I
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 1991
PAGE 2
the Departments activities. Commissioner Willett stated that he has some ideas
on this subject. He will research this and report back at the December meeting.
4. REPORTS (FOR INFORMATION ONLY)
Otav Vallev Reaional Park
Director Valenzuela introduced the Department's Landscape Architect Marty
Schmidt who gave the Commission a brief presentation on the Otay Regional Park
planning efforts and talked about the Otay Valley Resource Enhancement Plan and
how it affects the City of Chula Vista as far as future parkland is concemed.
5. ACTION fTEMS
Unfinished Business
NONE
New Business
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
Director Valenzuela presented the Department's proposed Strategic Plan for the
period 1992 - 1994 and asked for questions and comments from the
Commissioners.
The Commissioners were very much in favor of a non-profit "Friends of the Park"
type of organization. Commissioner Hall suggested that the Chamber of
Commerce could probably offer much assistance in the formation of such an
advocacy group.
Commissioner Willett suggested researching what other cities in the state have
done and their degree of success and then patteming ours after some of the more
successful ones.
Director Valenzuela stated that one would have to be developed that would be
unique to Chula Vista's specific needs. He does, however, favor taking a look at
the successful models available.
Motion to accept the draft Strategic Plan as presented.
MSC WILLETT/LIND 4-0
\~~~
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 1991
PAGE 3
Motion to place the "Information and Referral Center Vacancy" on the agenda for
the current meeting.
MSC LlND/WILLETT 4-0
The Director presented the staff report on the proposed use of the space that is
being vacated by the Information and Referral Center upon the completion of the
new Norman Park Senior Center.
Motion to accept the staff recommendation as to the use of the Information and
Referral Center space with the modification that al1 "coulds" be changed to
"woulds", and limiting the photographic museum to wal1 space only.
MSC LlND/WILLETT 4-0
6. COMMUNICATIONS
a. Written Co"esDondence
None
b. Commissioners' Comments
Commissioner Roland asked about the goff course "grandfather clause." He has
been contacted by someone who has al1egedly been denied access to the
"grandfather" ticket. Commissioner Roland asked if the Department could
investigate this.
Adjournment to the next regularly scheduled meeting of December 19, 1991.
Respectful1y submitted,
" ~413 ~
Caro Cramer Stohr
~~-:S
City ofChula Vista
Parks (f1 Qecreation Department
/3 ;-7
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
SfRATEGY #1:
~
INCREASE FACILITIFS
II
Issues Addressed:
City-wide shortage of facilities
Recommended Actions:
1. Establish Joint Use Agreements (1992)
A. School District
B. Southwestern College
C. Olympic Training Center (1993)
D. Investigate shared CIP's with above (1993)
2. Develop new park benefit fees through assessing commercial(mdustrial development and
development impact fees (1992)
3. Pursue developing temporary structures in parks and recreation deficient areas (1993)
4. Upgrade facilities through funding by (1993-1994): ContributionslDonations
SfRATEGY #2:
~ ESTABLISH A PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE POUCY AND SCHEDULE II
Issues Addressed:
1.
2.
3.
Cost effective
Safety!liability
Minimize major CIP's - extend facility lifetime
4.
5.
Improve appearance
Enhance public image
Recommended Actions:
1. Inventory/survey existing conditions (departmental teams) (1992)
2. Develop park and facility standards for new/existing facilities (uniform specifications) (1993-1994)
3. Interdepartmental coordination (1992)
4. Consider creative financing to help off-set required preventative maintenance costs (percent of
revenues collected for recreational activities. to be earmarked for facility repairs) (1993-1994)
1
/J-rt
\}"/
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
STRATEGY #3:
~ TO ASSESS & IMPLEMENT BUSINESS PROCEDURFS FOR THE DEPARTMENT II
Issues Addressed:
Computerization of the department through a network for all recreation centers, pools and park
supervisory staff. Improved operation for:
1. Scheduling - buildings, staff, parks, fields & programs
2. Water management
3. Inventory - equipment/supplies
4. Maintenance schedules - parks - buildings
Recommended Actions:
Priority #1:
Develop a phasing plan for acquisition of computer equipment and software
needs assessment (1992)
revenue generation (1993)
purchase/staff training (1994)
Priority #2:
Develop self-sustaining programs through formation of Community Center Advisory
Groups. Advisory groups would consider (1992-1993):
non-resident fees
program surcharge
% rental fees back to department
Priority #3:
Enhance customer service through staff training and business-like atmosphere in center
offices
establish customer service training for staff (1992)
recruit and train volunteers to staff center offices during the time the paid staff
not available (1992-1993)
2
))/ )
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
STRATEGY #4:
~
FORMUlATE AN ACTION PLAN TO PROVIDE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT
IN THE PARK SYSTEM
II
Issues Addressed:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Vandalism
Equipment
Facilities
Field maintenance
5.
6.
7.
8.
Security - gates/alarm system
Homeless
Increase park patrol
Landscape maintenance
Recommended Actions:
Priority #1: Establish a procedure with police department to monitor homeless in parks (1992)
Priority #2: Establish an "Adopt-A-Park" program through Neighborhood Watch. Neighbors to
receive phone numbers of contact persons (1992-1993)
Priority #3: Establish Park Ranger training to a level that would give them "citing authority"
(1993)
Priority #4: Implement alarm system for park facilities (1994)
STRATEGY #5:
Plan A:
WORKLOAD EVALUATION
Assess present workloads and develop plan to share with other departments the
"opportunity" to be involved in Commissions and city-wide events; or
Establish a new Community Services Division to coordinate cultural arts,
child/adult care, special events, public relations and brochure
Plan B:
Issues Addressed:
Commissions
City-wide special events
Recommended Actions:
Priority #1 for Plan A:
Evaluate (at administration level) work distribution brought on by
addition of new Commissions and city-wide special events
Priority #1 for Plan B:
Within one year (1992), establish a Community Services Division
Phase in staffing within 2 years (1993-1994)
3
/J - IV
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
STRATEGY #6:
/I
ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO
REDUCE WATER USAGE
~
Issues Addressed:
1. Water costs
2. Water availability
3. Water sources
4. Facility/grounds maintenanCe
5. Purveyor constraints
Recommended Actions:
1. Adopt goals stated in Parks and Recreation 1991 Department Goals on water conservation
(1992)
2. Create Water Manager position (1993)
3. lnvestigate alternatives (1993-1994):
a. Reclaimed
b. De-salinization
c. Wells
STRATEGY #7:
/I
CREATE "SERVICE CENTERS" TO INCREASE STAFF
EFFICIENCY AND MAXIMIZE RESOURCES
~
Issues Addressed:
1. Customer Service
2. Ownership
3. Effective supervision
4. Budget tracking/constraints
Recommended Actions:
1. Identify service areas (1992)
2. Evaluate supervisor/employee ratio (1992)
3. Re-format budget (1992)
4. Present to the City Manager, the One-stop shop concept (1993)
5. Institute computerized phasing program (1994)
4
)}/II
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
STRATEGY #8:
II
CREATE POllCY TO INCREASE REVENUE
ENHANCING SERVICES
11
Issues Addressed:
1. Outside resources continue to decrease
2. Service expectations continue to increase
3. Staffing levels remain constant
Recommended Actions: (all in 1992)
1. Investigate creative financing for parks and recreation programs
2. Train staff through NRP A's Revenue Management School
3. Increase partnerships with service organizations
4. Investigate and report to the City Manager potential areas to contract services
5. Develop a volunteer program in P & R
6. Create a Revenue Enhancement Committee with an end product of a Revenue Generation
Plan (1992)
STRATEGY #9:
II
DEVELOP PARK AND RECREATION MASTER PlAN
II
Recommended Actions:
Priority #1:
Research and write a proposal for City Manager's review and support for the need of
a Park Master Plan (1992)
Priority #2:
Describe the benefits of city-wide Park Master Plan. These can include:
A Meeting needs of demographic changes
B. Development of standards for passive/active parks
Priority #3:
Identify potential funding sources/outside of General Fund
Priority #4:
Hire consultant (1993)
Priority #5:
Implementation of Master Plan (1994)
5
/)~/J-
I'
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
STRATEGY #10:
I
DEVELOPMENT OF "FRIENDS OF 1HE PARK" GROUP FOR 1HE
PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
~
Recommended Actions:
Priority #1: Develop concept of non-profit corporation for the purpose of providing support for
department programs
Priority #2: The City Manager/Council support (1992)
A Identify benefits to City
B. Provide funding for more services
C. Promote department
D. Defer equipments needs
Priority #3: Implementation of non-profit (1993)
A Bylaws
B. Membership criteria/training
C. Action plan
Priority #4: Determination of department needs and priority i.e. Adopt Tree/MemoriaVgifts
catalogue, etc.
6
)3-"r)
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~
Meeting Date 5/5/92
ITEM TITLE: Report on SANDAG Regional Growth Management Strategy
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning R{J.../
REVIEWED BY: City Managerj
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.lO
Attached is the fInal draft of the SANDAG Regional Growth Management Strategy (RGMS).
The RGMS has been developed through SANDAG in response to Proposition C, the County
Advisory Measure on Growth Management which was approved by the voters in 1988. The
City Council reviewed a draft of the RGMS on October 1, 1991, and directed staff to forward
specifIc comments on the draft report. On January 24, 1992, the SANDAG Board recommended
approval of the attached revised draft report, which includes responses to all of the comments
received from Chula Vista and other reviewing agencies.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the revised draft Regional Growth Management
Strategy.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed RGMS includes quality of life standards for nine regional factors: air quality,
transportation, water, sewage treatment, sensitive lands preservation and open space protection,
solid waste management, hazardous waste management, housing, and economic prosperity. It
should be noted that the quality of life standard for "economic prosperity" was added in response
to comments from the City of Chula Vista and several other reviewing agencies regarding the
need for such a standard. In addition to these standards, the RGMS addresses the rate and
distribution of growth, and the siting and fInancing of regional facilities. The RGMS also
contains a self-certifIcation process for determining local and regional agency consistency.
On October 4, 1991, the City Manager forwarded a letter to SANDAG containing comments on
the draft RGMS, as authorized by the City Council. In response to these comments, and others
received, SANDAG staff and the RGMS Technical Committee, which includes representatives
from all participating agencies, revised the document, and also prepared a detailed response to
comments. City staff has reviewed the revised draft RGMS, as well as the response to
comments, and we feel that the changes and clarifIcations which have been provided are
responsive to the concerns raised by the City with regard to the draft document. Therefore, it
is recommended that the City Council approve the revised draft RGMS, and direct staff to
\1.\- \
.
L)
Page 2, Item ~
Meeting Date~
continue to work toward the implementation of the ROMS. Two of the next major tasks in this
implementation process will be:
1) completion of the "local/regional consistency checklist," which will be used by each of
the participating agencies to report consistency of local plans and policies with the
ROMS;
2) development of the Series 8 Regional Population and Housing Forecast, taking into
account consistency with the quality of life standards in the ROMS.
Staff will return to the City Council with reports on both of these items during the next 3 to 6
months.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
(rgmtl2.al13)
\'4. ~7-11J/''1
~-
--
~~
~ San Diego
ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS
Suite 800, First Interstate Plaza
401 B Street
San Diego, California 92101
(619)595-5300 Fax (619)595-5305
February 24, 1992
Mr. John Goss
City Manager, City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mr. Goss:
Enclosed are the written responses to the City of Chula Vista's comments on the Draft
Regional Growth Management Strategy (July, 1991). The comments and responses
received during the public review period, and a Revised Draft of the Strategy were
reviewed by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), serving as the
Regional Planning and Growth Management Review Board on January 24, 1992.
SANDAG certified the Negative Declaration and is recommending approval of the Strategy
by each city council and the Board of Supervisors. SANDAG will consider final approval
following action by the local jurisdictions.
Thank you again for your letter. If you have any questions or would like a copy of all the
comments and responses please contact me or the project manager, Susan Baldwin, at
595-5343.
KES/ah
Attachment
cc: Tim Nader, Mayor
City Councilmembers
Bob Leiter, P~g Director
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chule Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, EI Cajon, Encinit8s, Escondida, Imperial Beach, La Mesa,
Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee. Solana Beach, Vista and C.,?unty of ~an D~ego..
ADVISORY/LIAISON MEMBERS: California Departmt~0~T3sportation, U.S. Department of Defense and TI)Uana/Ba)a Cahforma.
RESPONSES TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA'S COMMENTS ON THE
DRAFT REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION
January 24, 1992
The responses to the comments received on the Draft Regional Growth Management Strategy
(July, 1991) were reviewed by the Strategy Writing/Consistency Subcommittee of the Regional
Growth Technical Committee and the full Technical Committee. The Revised Draft Regional
Growth Management Strategy dated January, 1992, has been changed to reflect the responses
to the comments. (The page numbers in this document refer to those found in the Revised Draft
dated January, 1992.)
Air Quality
1. Air quality considerations need to be balanced with transportation objectives to reduce
traffic congestion and clean up our air, while at the same time minimizing the potential
negative economic impacts.
Response: The trip reduction program approved by SANDAG as part of the
Transportation Control Measures of the Regional Air Quality Plan is
designed to give employers flexibility in meeting trip reduction goals.
Employers choose the tactics appropriate to their circumstances and
employees' needs. No fees are imposed. The program is voluntary for
employers achieving the objectives. No change has been made to the
Revised Draft.
2. Include language in the Air Quality section which would indicate the intent to include
policies and implementation actions relative to "indirect sources" of air pollution.
Response: The Recommended Actions for Air Quality have been rewritten to
describe the work being done related to land use, i.e., indirect sources.
Transportation/Congestion Management
1. On pages 11 and 12, Item 1, last sentence, it is suggested that the wording be clarified
to read: In cases where the level of service falls below D as caused by a $petific
develojlment or nroiect. miti~ation measures should be ell)ployed unless there are
overridin~ social or economic benefits to the re$pOnsible jurisdiction.
Response:
~
l~ -s
2. The method for measuring level of service on arterials and freeways should be specified.
The 1985 Highway Capacity Manual delay method is recommended.
Response: The Congestion Management Program which is a part of the Strategy
specifies the use of the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual for measuring
LOS. This has been noted in the Strategy too.
3. Page 12, item 4a change "people per vehicle" to "persons per vehicle."
Response: This change has been made.
4. Page 12, Item 4c change "rush hour" to "peak period."
Response: The term rush hour was used to make the document more readable to the
lay person. The term "peak period" has been added in parentheses
following "rush hour."
Water
1. Page 14, Policy wording: The word "improve" should be changed to "maintain." The
cities cannot require developers to improve existing bodies of water, but we can require
that they be maintained.
Response: No change has been made. There are cases in the region where improv-
ing the water quality of our surface water bodies is the goal. The San
Diego Bay is one example. Cleanup projects to improve water quality
may be in order in some cases. Recommended actions regarding water
quality need to be added to the Strategy.
2. Page 14, under Quality ofUfe Standards, reference should be made to the County Water
Authority and the MetroJ>Olitan Water District. Other water sources are controlled by
sewer agencies, i.e., water reclamation, and possible private sources such as the SDG&E
desalinization plant.
Response: The involvement of the MWD and other agencies has been referenced by
adding: The standards and objectives for availability are set locally,
ii.;~,iiiiti,FI._Willl
3. Page IS, under Water Availability: components are local and imported supply,
conservation, reclamation, storage and possibly desalinization.
Response: The County Water Authority recommended changing the wording to
identify three general components of water supply: water resources,
infrastructure (pipelines, pumps and reservoirs) and demand management.
2
1~...6
4. Page 15, Item 2, is unclear. Does per capita include all uses, including industrial,
agriculture and landscaping, or just residential?
Response: Per capita use refers to all uses except agriculture. This has been clarified
;.lii~iretical statement: mIJRi.t__.~~"
5. Page 17, Item 1d, grey water use should be considered only under special circumstances.
Response: On page 17, Item 6, the Strategy recommends consideration of the use of
grey water under emergency circumstances only, e.g., during drought
conditions.
6. Page 17, Item 1, the following should be added as f: Initiate new ways of producine
water. such as buyinl! water from farmers. Work to make water oolicy based on market
considerations.
Response: Recommended action #2 on page 17 indicates that SANDAG should
pursue a legislative program consistent with the Quality of Life Standards
and Objectives and Recommended Actions. Also, a phrase has been
added to Item 1e. to indicate that the County Water Authority will be
considering new ways of obtaining water through legislation: ~r.l{
111;1!111;r_'.j~.\m.;ltr.j,~:,;girJBI!Il_.
7. Page 17, Item 3a: Is the xeriscape provision meant to be mandatory? Does it prohibit
lawns?
Response: The state Department of Water Resources is preparing a model water
efficient landscape ordinance. Cities and counties have until January 1,
1993, to adopt the Model Ordinance, adopt some other water efficient
landscape ordinance, or issue a finding that they do not need such an
ordinance based upon specified factors. If a city or county does not take
any action, the Model Ordinance adopted by the Department shall take
effect on January 1, 1993. The purpose of the Model Ordinance is to
establish a structure for designing, installing and maintaining water
efficient landscapes. The Model Ordinance may limit the amount of high
water use plants such as turf.
Sewage Treatment
1. Page 19, paragraph 3, recommend revising first sentence regarding secondary treatment
to read: "The quality of life should be preserved by adequately treating the sewage,
considering the impact on the receiving bodies of water, and economics."
3
1\\"'1
Response: Note that the first and second sentences on page 19, paragraph 3, have
statement of the Clean Water Program has been added.
On Page 20, Item 2, the recommended action regarding the one year pilot
test program has been added; on Page 20, Item 3, the additional language
should not be added as this issue will be handled as part of the Integrated
Waste Management Plan implementation process.
The creation of a special district for the Metro sewer system is not
recommended at this time. Further evaluation of this proposal should be
undertaken prior to its inclusion in the Strategy.
2. Page 19, Policy statement: The policy statement need not state "MEET FEDERAL
SEWAGE TREATMENT STANDARDS" because of efforts to seek relief from the
requirement for secondary treatment.
Response: This policy is based on federal law, and the wording of the policy has
been retained. This statement does not preclude the federal government
from allowing a form of treatment other than secondary.
3. Page 19, Quality of Life Standards and Objectives: Add a sentence stating that "Any
agency approving a development must have adequate sewage capacity, or be contracted
for such prior to approving development projects. "
Response: Similar wording has been added following paragraph 3 on page 21.
4. Page 20, paragraph 2, suggest deleting cost estimates for secondary treatment since there
are no costs included anywhere else in the report.
Response: Because cost is such a significant component of the sewage treatment issue
the language has been retained.
5. Page 20, Recommended Actions, Item 1, should be "Support City of San Diego's efforts
in seeking a legislative remedy to avoid converting Pt. Lorna."
Response: This wording has not been added. Item 1 acknowledges the need to obtain
agreement on the level of treatment.
6. Page 20, Item 3, add underlined wording: Include water reclamation plants in the capital
improvement program of local sewage treatment plant operators with the sewa~e ae:ency
4
I~ ,~
p~n~ for those costs un to seconda1:y treatment includinl! di~sal of non-saleable water.
and the water al!ency Jl~n~ for tertiary treatment and distribution of reclaimed water.
Response: This wording has not been added as it is too technical for this document,
and it is not clear at this time which agency will foot the bill for these
facilities. The consumer, however, will ultimately pay for these facilities
through user fees and hookup charges, etc.
7. Page 20, add Item 5, to read: "Each agency shall have guaranteed treatment capacity,
or have contracted with another agency for capacity, prior to approving development
projects. "
Response: Recommended Action Item 5 has been added, as will a question to the
Consistency Checklist asking if each jurisdiction has a procedure for
determining the availability of sewage capacity for new development.
This procedure should address the capacity for the long-term growth of
the jurisdiction as well as capacity for individual projects.
Sensitive Lands Preservation and Open Space Protection
1. Recommended actions for Sensitive Lands and Open Space are ambiguous with respect
to the actions local government should take.
Response: A Regional Open Space Plan is being prepared as part of the Strategy.
The defInition of Regionally SignifIcant Open Space included in the Draft
Strategy (which is part of the Plan) identifIes consistent regulatory criteria
for development affecting sensitive lands.
An early draft of the Strategy included a recommended action that local
jurisdictions should adopt the policies regarding steep slopes, floodplains
and wetlands included in the DefInition of Regional Open Space. The
language was removed because it seemed redundant. The language has
~.a.~
tency with these policies through the self-certifIcation process.
It has also been noted that the DefInition report is in fact part of the
Strategy.
Growth Rate, Phasing and Land Use Distribution
1. SANDAG should monitor each jurisdiction's growth based on the employment and
population forecasts.
5
,~..q
Response: Each year SANDAG monitors the growth of the local jurisdictions and
compares their actual growth with the forecast growth (Series 7 Regional
Growth Forecast Monitoring Report - August 1990). This process will be
part of the monitoring component of the Strategy. A monitoring report
on population growth and the achievement of the Quality of Life Standards
and Objectives will be prepared annually.
Miscellaneous
1. The implementation of the policies and programs contained in the Draft Strategy will
require a significant commitment of local agency resources. It is important for
SANDAG and local agency staffs to further evaluate the fiscal implications of the
proposed Strategy, and provide relevant information regarding fiscal impacts to the
policymakers prior to final adoption.
Response: The Strategy Writing/Consistency Subcommittee requested that this issue
be noted in the January Board report. The Strategy will affect both
members and non-member agencies to different degrees.
6
'''\ -I D'
R-ECiEf\.TED
~ San Diego
ASSOCIATIOl'\ OF
GO\ 'ER.i,~1EXTS
, !S'92
Suite BOO. First Interstate Plaza
401 B Street
San Diego, California 92101
(619)595-5300 Fax (619)595-5305
February 11, 1992
PLANNING.
Mr. John Goss
City Manager
P.O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 91912
Dear Mr. Goss:
On January 24, 1992, the Revised Draft Regional Growth Management Strategy and
Negative Declaration were presented to the San Diego Association of Governments
(SANDAG), serving as the Regional Planning and Growth Management Review Board.
SANDAG certified the Negative Declaration and is recommending approval of the Strategy
by each city council and the Board of Supervisors.
We would like the local jurisdictions to approve the Strategy during the next couple of
months, and will be happy to attend any meetings to help explain its contents. A copy of
the Revised Draft Strategy is attached, and revisions to the Consistency Checklist
(Appendix 1), which will be used by local jurisdictions and regional agencies to self-certify
their consistency with the Strategy, will be sent out following the Regional Board's review
on February 28.
The Strategy, as recommended for approval by the Regional Board, includes the following:
1. The Quality of Life Standards and Objectives for nine factors, the eight contained
in the original draft and the addition of an economic prosperity factor.
2. Recommended actions for the original eight Quality of Life Factors.
3. A Self-Certification Process to determine Loca1IRegional Consistency, and
Monitoring Reports to Assess Achievement of the Quality of Life Standards and
Objectives and Accuracy of the Regional Growth Forecast.
4. SANDAG's Conflict Resolution Procedure, which can be used to resolve disputes
related to the Strategy.
The Regional Growth Management Strategy applies a quality of life approach to growth
management by establishing Quality of Life Standards and Objectives for the region, and
Recommended Actions to achieve them. These are contained in a set of state/federally
mandated functional plans, and regionally initiated plans and programs, all of which
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar. EI Cajon. Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, Le Mesa,
Lemon Grove. National City, Oceanside. poway San Diego. San Marcos. Santee, Solana Beach, Vista and County of San Diego
ADVISORY/L1AIS~N MEMBERS: California Depa~:ll f\ Transportation. U.S. o~partment of Defense and Tijuana/Baja California
Mr. 10hn Goss
City Manager
City of Chula Vista
February 11, 1992
Page 2
comprise the Strategy. The Strategy links these manclates and regional initiatives together
into a consistent whole to facilitate decision-making by elected officials on growth-related
issues, thus creating a framework for managing growth in the region.
The Strategy includes state and federally manclated plans such as: SANDAG's Regional
Housing Needs Statement, Transportation Control Measures, and Congestion Management
Program; the Air Pollution Control District's Regional Air Quality Strategy; the County
of San Diego's Hazardous Waste Management Plan; and local jurisdictions' Source
Reduction and Recycling Elements and general plan housing elements. These plans
contain the majority of the Strategy's stanc1ards and objectives, and recommended actions.
Work is still in progress on most of the regionally-initiated plans and programs. A
Definition of Regionally Significant Open Space has been completed and approved by the
Board as part of the Strategy (the first piece of the Regional Open Space Plan). Work is
also being done to prepare recommended actions for regional public facilities financing,
economic prosperity as an added Quality of Life Factor, regional land use distribution, and
growth rate policies.
The original draft of the Regional Growth Management Strategy was distributed with a
Negative Declaration to Board members, local agencies, various SANDAG committees,
regional single-purpose agencies, water and sewer districts, transportation operators, and
other interested organizations and individuals in luly 1991. Letters of response to the
comments received during the public review period are being sent under separate cover.
If you need any additional information, or have any questions, please call me at 595-5300,
or have your staff call Susan Baldwin at 595-5343.
Sincerely,
KENNETH E. SULZER
Executive Director
KES/SB/cd
Attachment
cc: Bob Leiter, Planning Director
George Krempl, Deputy City Manager
Iq "12-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, EI Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, la Mesa,
lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and County of San Diego.
ADVISORY/LIAISON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Defense, and Tijuana/Baja California.
I
REVISED DRAFT
REGIONAL GROWTH
MANAGEMENT
STRATEGY
February, '992
San Diego
~
ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS
San Diego Association of Governments
401 B Street . Suite BOO
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 595-5300
/t/-j J
"II!I
REGIONAL PLANNING AND
GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW BOARD
~
Board of Directors
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
-
The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) serves as the Regional Planning
and Growth Management Review Board which is developing a cooperative growth management
strategy to help us all better handle the adverse impacts of rapid population growth.
Voting members include the Incorporated Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, EI Cajon,
Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside,
Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and the County of San Diego.
Advisory and Uaison members include CAL TRANS, San Diego Unified Port District,
U.S. Department of Defense, and Tijuana,tBaja California.
....
i
""!
1
""\
CHAIRMAN: Hon. Jack Doyle
VICE CHAIRWOMAN: Hon. Gloria E. McClellan
SECRETARY-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Kenneth E. Sulzer
CITY OF POWA Y
Hon. Jan Goldsmith, Mayor
(A) Hon. Kathy Mcintyre. Council member
...,
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Hen. Bud Lewis, Mayor
(A) Hon. Ann Kulchin, Mayor Pro Tern
~
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Hon. Leonard Moore, Mayor Pro rem
(A) Hon. Tim Nader, Mayor
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
Hon. Judy McCarty, Councilmember
(A) Hon. Tom Behr, Councilmember
....
CITY OF CORONADO
Hon. Michel Napolitano, Mayor Pro rem
(A) Hon. Susan Keith, Council member
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
Hen. Lee Thibedeau, Mayor
(A) Hon. Mike Preston, Councilmember
CITY OF DEL MAR
Hon. Gay Hugo-Martinez, Deputy Mayor
(A) Hon. J. Rod Franklin. Councilmember
(A) Hon. Jacqueline Winter.r, Mayor
CITY OF SANTEE
Hon. Jack Doyle, Mayor
(A) Hon. Hal Ryan, Councilmamber
.,
CITY OF EL CAJON
Hon. Harriet Stockwell, Deputy Mayor
(A) Hon. Beverly Miller, Council member
(A) Hon. Mark Lewis, Councilmember
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
Hon. Richard Handlin, Mayor
(A) Hon. Margaret Schlesinger, Councilmember
(A) Hon. Celine Olson, Deputy Mayor
""\
-
CITY OF ENCINrTAS
Hon. Maura Wiegand, Deputy Mayor
(A) Hon. Gail Hano, Mayor
CITY OF VISTA
Hon. Gloria E. McClellan, Mayor
(A) Hon. Bernie Rappaport, Mayor Pro Tem
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
Hon. Jerry Harmon, Mayor
(A) Hon. Kris Murphy, Councilmember
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Hon. Brian Bilbray, Supervisor
(A) Hon. Susan Golding, Supervisor
(A) Hon. John MacDonald, Supervisor
...
,
CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH
Hon. Mike Bixler, Mayor
(A) Hon. Marti Goethe, Councilmember
CITY OF LA MESA
Hon. Art Madrid, Mayor
(A) Hon. Barry Jantz, Councilmember
(A) Hon. Jay LaSuer, Councilmember
STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
(Advisory Member)
James W. van Loben Sels, Director
(A) Jesus Garcia, District Eleven Director
....
...,
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT
(Advisory Member)
Rip Reopelle, Commissioner
CITY OF LEMON GROVE
Hen. James V. Dorman, Mayer
(A) Hon. Brian Cochran, Councilmember
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
(Uaison Member)
Capt. Tom Crane, USN, CEC
Commanding Officer Southwest Division
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
~
.,
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
Hon. Jess E. Van Deventer, CouncUmember
(A) Hon. Michael Dalla, Councilmember
TIJUANAjBAJA CALIFORNIA
(Advisory Member)
Hon. Carlos Montejo Favela
Presidente Municipal de Tijuana
,
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
Hon. Nancy York, Councilmember
(A) Hon. Melba Bishop, Deputy Mayor
,
,
RniMcl 3/1/82
AcImlnJGrowbocl
Ii-Ii
.,
I
I
I
I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I
The Regional Growth Management Strategy was prepared with the cooperation and assistance
of the Regional Growth Management Technical Committee. The members of the Technical
Committee are listed below:
I
I
REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
San Diego Association of Govermnents
I
CHAIR: Ray Patchett
I
I
I
City of Carlshad
Ray Patchett, City Manager
Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director
City of Lemon Grove
Jack Shelver, City Manager
James Butler, Community Development
Director
City of Chula Vista
Bob Leiter, Director of Planning
George Krempl, Deputy City Manager
City of National City
Roger Post, Planning Director
Steve Ray, Priocipal Planner
City of Coronado
Ed Kleeman, Senior Planner
City of Oceanside
Sandra Holder, Assistant Planning Director
I
City of Del Mar
James Sandoval, Planning Director
City of Poway
Reba Wright-Quastler, Planning Director
I
City of EI Cajon
Jim Griffm, Acting Planning Director
I
City of Encinitas
Warren Shafer, City Manager
Patrick Murphy, Director of
Community Development
City of San Diego
Severo Esquivel, Deputy City Manager
Paul Fiske, Senior Planner
Kent Floro, Management Assistant
I
I
City of Escondido
Charles Grimm, Planning Director
City of San Marcos
Rick Gittings, City Manager
Mike Mistrot, Assistant City Manager
Jerry Backoff, Division Director of the
Planning Division
City of Imperial Beach
Norman G. Williams, Community
Development Director
City of Santee
Niall Fritz, Director of Planning
& Community Development
I
City of La Mesa
David Witt, Community Development
Director
City of Solana Beach
Steve Apple, Community DevelopmentDirector
Michael Huse, City Manager
I
iii
I
/<j~if
....
~
City of Vista
Tom Bell, Director of Community Development
..,
I
County of San Diego
Lari Sheehan, Deputy Chief Administrative
Officer
Lauren Wasserman, Director, Departmentaf
Planning and Land Use
Gerry Hermanson, Deputy Director, Regional
Planning
Bob Asher, Chief of Special Projects and
Transportation Planning
..,
.,
8mte Deparbnent of Transportation
Carl West, Deputy District Director for
Planning and Public Transportation
Gene Pound, Transportation Planning Branch
Chief
,
J
""!
,
J
U.S. Deparbnent of Defense
A. Douglas Lemaire, Special Assistant on
Intergovernmental Affairs
....
,
Loca1 Agency Formation Commission
Michael Ott, Assistant Executive Officer
.,
Port of San Diego
Fred Trull, Planning Director
.,
Air PoUution Control District
Richard]. Sommerville, Air PoUution Control
Officer
...
In addition, the following staff of the San Diego Association of Governments participated
in the technical work:
...,
Kenneth E. Sulzer, Executive Director
Stuart R. Shaffer, Deputy Executive Director
Debra Greenfield, Legal Counsel
Michael McLaughlin, Director of Land Use and Public Facilities
Lee Hultgren, Director of Transportation
Bob Parrott, Director of Research
Garry Bonelli, Communications Director
Susan Baldwin, Senior Regional Planner, Project Manager
Jeff Tayman, Senior Regional Planner
Steve Sachs, Senior Regional Planner
Ruth Potter, Senior Regional Planner
Nan Valerio, Senior Regional Planner
John Duve, Administrator, Transportation Demand Management Program
George Franck, Senior Transportation Planner
Bill McFarlane, Senior Transportation Planner
Bill Tuomi, Manager of Transportation Programming
""!
)
.,
.,
...
""!
.,
iv
/tj~/~
.,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ABSTRACT
TITLE: Ri\l'iSi!d Draft Re . onal Growth Mana e-
.,.,..,..",.,.""."" gt g
ment Strategy
AUTIIOR: San Diego Association of Governments
SUBJECT: Policies and Recommended Actions to
Address the Adverse Impacts of Growth in
the San Diego Region
DATE: February, 1992
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY: San Diego Association of Governments
401 B Street, Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92101
NUMBER OF PAGES: 103
ABSTRACT: The ~W~ Draft Regional Growth
Management Strategy was prepared by
SANDAG staff and the Regional Growth
Management Technical Committee if~t
1;;r,II,:~rt!:!!!
aquaiityofiifeapproach to growth manage-
ment, and contains standards and objectives
and recommended actions for eight Qi~
9ull1it~of Life fact~~s: llir q~alit~, ~I,t
pqrt4B9!M~~~~~mm~U water,
8ewagediSp6SiU,. seriSitiveliiililS.preservation
and open space protection, solid waste
management, hazardous waste management,
tf8.B~aft&tieB system and demand ftUlBsge
meM, IIIId housing B~g~9Rjj!~.
Recommendations regarding public facilities
fmancing and siting, and growth rate,
phasing and land use distribution are also
included. The I~~ Draft Strategy also
contains a self~ceriitlcation process for
determining local and regional agency
consistency.
v
/ Lj/ /7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
....
/ Lj -/'(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
. INTRODUCTION .....................................
AN OVERVIEW OF THE REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT
STRATEGY .........................................
AIR QUAllTY .......................................
TRANSPORTATION/ SYSTEM MID DEMMID 11l&ti.~l.li
MANAGEMENT ................... .::u:"::::::. . . . . . . . .
WATER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SEWAGE TREAlMENT .................................
SENSITIVE LANDS PRESERVATION AND OPEN SPACE
PROTECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HOUSING ..........................................
ECONOMIC PROSPERITY ...............................
REGIONAL PUBUC FACIUTIES FINANCING AND SITING . . . . . . . . .
GROWTH RATE, PHASING AND LAND USE DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . .
LOCAL/REGIONAL CONSISTENCY
..... ..... . ......... . ....
APPENDICES:
1. LOCAL/REGIONAL CONSISTENCY CHECKUST ...... . . .
2. SELF-CERTIFICATION PROCESS AND SCHEDULE .......
3. JOBSIIIOUSmc BALMJCE .\l'ID TR.\l'JSPORTf.TImJ
CORRIDOR DENSITIES REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
q;i~~;11'1?g~~$m~~~tl&~Yi~ms~~~~ . . . . . . . . . .
4. NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND INITIAL STUDY. . . . . . . .
vii
/tj - / I
1
3
7
11
14
19
21
23
26
28
30
32
34
38
43
81
87
91
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTRODUCTION
The San Diego region, its people and its environment, is about as diverse as a place can
be. We come from all walks of life, and this fact, plus the sheer size ofthe area, contributes
to our varied points of view.
But most of us agree about at least one thing -- we don't want the region's growth to make
living here a hassle, to hurt our "quality of life". That is what this Regional Growth
Management Strategy is all about -- deciding what we are going to do together to manage
our growth.
"Together" is a key principle of this Strategy. The actions proposed here will have to be
carried out by all of us -- individuals, families, and workers, and by government and business
as well.
Managing growth together has the endorsement ofthe region's voters. In November, 1988,
they approved Proposition C, the Regional Planning and Growth Control Initiative, advising
local government to jointly prepare a regional plan for growth. This Strategy responds to
the voters' wishes.
Our actions in carrying out the Strategy should be aimed at preserving or improving our
"quality of life" -- a frequently-used term that is often hard to defme.
When they endorsed regional growth management, the voters helped defme "quality of life"
for us. As a regional community, we should work to improve such things as our air, water,
transportation, and waste management.
The Regional Growth Management Strategy presented on the following pages identifies basic
factors that help determine the quality of our lives in this region. It also describes what
we should do to ensure that we will enjoy the region as much in the future as we do now.
There are at least two ways that the Regional Growth Management Strategy is different
from what we have done in the past. These differences also distinguish our area from most
other metropolitan areas in the United States.
First, the Regional Growth Management Strategy will be the one place where all actions
affecting growth and the region's quality of life will be looked at together. In the past,
building highways, locating a new landfill site, or preserving open space have been handled
primarily by individual agencies. The Strategy pulls all of the important quality of life issues
together in one place to help us better understand what we need to do to maintain and improve
our quality of life.
1
/y-c2t?
-
Second, the Strategy ~~~lj~h~~i~~Wqf!fr9rmiml'mggtqW~!At~rii&!!;!~l erelHeS
a way for everyone intl1ere,giontoa,greeandcoopernteonil1ebestwaysiomana,ge growth
and improve our quality of life. All of the region's local governments, the 18 cities and
the County of San Diego, will have to approve the Strategy and agree to carry out the actions
necessary to make it work. In some cases every community in the region will have to agree
to do similar things, for example, recycling 50 % of the trash in each local jurisdiction by
the year 2000. In others, however, there will be trade-offs where one community will have
to do more in one quality of life area, while another community takes the lead in another.
Locating region-serving facilities such as sewage treatment plants, landfills and jails are
examples of such trade-offs.
...
..,
!
.,
.,
The level of cooperation, and the commitment to working together on region-wide growth
issues is a challenge. Our future quality of life depends on our success.
1
,
-
]
'"'\
..,
...
,
..,
I
J
.,
,
.,
.,
.,
~
':i
,
~
,
;
""I
;
2
/tJ-)(
'"'l
,
i
;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AN OVERVIEW OF THE
REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
By 201G~ the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) forecasts the total
population of the region will be nearly ~ ~;p million people. This means an average
increase in population of 35,000 ~~ig people Per year, or about as many people as currently
live in the City ofSElft Mareas ~1~~Pi~. This isan increase of about 799,900 :li~:I!!!I9~
over the next ~ ~.~. years, or sfte thifll~~~, more than the current population of the
region. Associated with.~~e population growth is an increase of about 399,000 !tl~~~
new jobs and 343,090 IfRi!1!9Q new housing units. .....................
--
Quality of Life Factors
To maintain and improve our quality of life as the region continues to grow, the Strategy
focuses on eight. important environmental and economic factors. These Quality of Life
factors are:
· Air Quality
. Transportation System and Demand Management
. Water
. Sewage Treatment
. Sensitive Lands Preservation and Open Space Protection
. Solid Waste Management
. Hazardous Waste Management
· Housing
'~RwislPm;fi.!y
Theyse QIIllHty sf Life faeteT3 were chosen because theyl91! address!!~ issues that affect
the whole San Diego region, not just individual jurisdictions. Most were also included in
the ballot initiative, Proposition C(~~PY9~1!:M99nmy~~~_i~gR)' During
the preparation of the Strategy other PotentiaJ qu3lit~~rlif~fllctotsj~~h.~scrime,j~~~,
energy and schools were discussed. These factors, ~9tB~~~~~9ftG~9gP!!~:m!
~~ggr~~; may be included in updates of the Strategy. ...
3
Ii! r ;2,?--
...
Quality of Life Standards and Objectives
.,
To determine how well we're doing with respect to maintaining or improving our quality
of life, standards and objectives were assigned to each factor. These standards and objectives
are the oals of the Strate . Aehill'.iB ~-.tiii'..~."'''':'' "'*"'.'."'.".""'." the Quality of Life Standards
g gy g ~."""""'"'"'' ."."",.,.,.".",."""",.".".,.,.
and Objectives will be the primary measure of the StIategy's success.
""!
.,
The standards and objectives are set in various ways, through federal m: state Ilwlfifflm
or ~(~.~limilYf leee:I Jl61ieie~ and regtllMieB~. Examples include state andfed'elii
air~;~iitY'staiidlirds,'l6eel ~ open space preservation policies, and the region's Ii
&llil;lp;'Jilprogram to red'i1cedrlve alone auto trips. ........ ..
.,
~
The standards and objectives are, as a rule, measurable so that we can monitor how well
we're doing in meeting them each year. Our success in achieving etIt' l1ni quality of life
standards and objectives will depend on everyone, including government ligencres, businesses
:~,~~;~d~; ~~i.I.. And if we succeed, the region will be a better place to
,
...
...
.
The Quality of Life Standards and Objectives are described on the next few pages along
with iBflum8aall. 61l. hew weH we are tleiBg iB aehieviBg them tetIfty, IlIl.tI what it will talte
;m;~~_I!II~!It!9B!m~ them in the future)ii!~fij.I;".1
1.....,11!ii
.,
...
-,'
The actions recommended to achieve the Quality of Life Standards and Objectives I~ffl\
i.lll..tll:r!!~J'!
JegteB&i:~Bblie&geileieiiiiHeiliisihe:A:ifPelllltiell. Cel'ltffll DiMfiet, IlIl.tI tile C6B~' "'liter
f,,1:ftIi6rity. They, and the etller resp6Bsible lIgeBeies are eitetI in tile 8JlJlfOllfillte seea6BS
-
,
,
,
..,
...
j
J
,
.,
...
...
.,
Our work towards meeting the Quality of Life Standards and Objectives will likely result
in some conflicts between standards, and implementation difficulties. The resolution of
these coordination and implementation problems will require the cities and the County to
...
.,
...
4
l
,
,
JL/~.J)
..,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
QUALITY OF LIFE
FACTORS
STANDARDS
AND
OBJECTIVES
I
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
,"""n..,,,,,,, ~,>s>>:;;"::":;;':::>l;",,,::,.
I I
I
STATE/FEDERAL MANDATES REGIONAL INITIATIVES
-Air Quality -Open Space/Sensitive Lands
-Transportation/Congestion - Growth Forecast
Management -Economy
-Water Supply/Quality -Land Use Distribution
-Sewage Treatment - Public Facilities Financing and Siting
-Solid Waste Management -Growth Rate Policies Ii
-Hazardous Waste Management
-Housing Needs
I
""""iL">"".,',,, I I ,
I
I I
CONSISTENCY WITH MONITORING OF GROWTH
LOCAl/REGIONAL PLANS FORECAST AND STRATEGY
- Self<ertification - Achievement of
-Memorandums of Agreement Quality of Life Standards
-Conflict Resolution -Accuracy of Growth Forecast
- Revised Actions
,......" ,= cCC' """", "'" "",..", """""""",".' ,
111120.-'>
5 / L/-:J-t(
~
work closely with each other, regional agencies like the County Water Authority and Regional
Water Quality Control Board, and in some cases state and federal agencies. Two examples
of potential coordination and implementation issues are noted below.
""I
-
· The objective of increasing water reclamation for use in irrigation and stream enhancement
may be inhibited by the groundwater quality standards.
"""I
· Funding sources for open space acquisition will need to be found to help achieve the
sensitive lands/open space Quality of Life objectives.
""'I
,
.
Regional Publie Facilities FiBaDeiBg aDd Sit~, aDd CI'6wtll. Rete,
PII.~iBg and Land The Distribution
"""I
Tkefe are twe aElEljt.ieRal ftfeQS af Feesmmendatiens eefltamed in the Stmtegy v;meh relate
to the aehieveftleflt of the Qttlllity of Life Stftndaffis BREI ObjeeHves: (1) RegioBM Pulllie
Faeilities Financing ftIl6 Siting, and (2) Cmwth Rate, Phasing and Land Use Distributien.
Hew V;6 wiD pay fer sueh things 8S tfft83fJ6ftatieft facilities ana 6I'efl spaee, e6 site faetHties
Hke B6VllaRe:lfI11s, BREi whet-her we saBula try and halanee jabs and aeusing te redaee tmffie
e68gesaoH ana imfJff)~/C air quality, are seme af the iS31::1CS msetlsse6 in these seetieBs.
""'I
1
..,
Local/Regional Consistency 1-~...~9m~91l~!:!~~lmg9~.~~q~~y
....
,
This section describes how we will monitor our progress in meeting the Quality of Life
Standards and Objectives, and how local jurisdictions and regional single-purpose agencies
iiii~il_1~;ii'i~iitili.'I'ttll..
.,
.,
-
.
...
!
l
....
T
....
""
""'I
.,
6
Ji-(;{
..,
,
.
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AIR QUALITY
POllCY: CLEAN UP OUR AIR
Introduction
Clean air is one of the most important factors determining the quality of life in the San Diego
region. Although the quality of our air has gradually improved over the past ten years
primarily because of controls on motor vehicles which have reduced tail pipe pollutants,
the region exceeded the state standard for ozone on 96 days in 1989 due to local sources.
Quality of Life Standards and Objectives
The California Clean Air Act of 1988 requires each air district to prepare and adopt a plan
showing how that district will achieve the state's clean air standards. The plan is supposed
to address both additional controls on industrial sources of pollution, and transportation
control measures to reduce emissions from motor vehicles.
SANDAG is responsible for developing and adopting the Transportation Control Measures
(TCMs) to be included in the Revised Regional Air Quality Strategy, based on the criteria
adopted by the Air Pollution Control Board. The Air Pollution Control Board will approve
the TCMs if they are consistent with the criteria.
The criteria for the TCMs include: increasing the number of people per motor vehicle during
commuting hours to an average of at least 1.5 persons per car ~y~~ (today we're at 1.1);
no net increase in vehicle emissions after 1997; reducing the rate oCirlcrease in vehicle trips
~tm~1i~ii#~lj.~~~i~~~:~t:~I!!~~!~~~;jf!!~~q!!!!!lf~~
control measures.
7
/I<~~
...
Recommended Actions
...
The reeaIHHlet1aOO tmn~J36ftatioft eeBlf61 measure:) include t-hc reHewing I'ftlgmms: 1)
tHulSfleftfttieB aelftllBa lft!lflflgelfteBt, 2) a tl'ftnilpeftfttieB eftj'lIlCity elIfl!lflsieB pregflHB, lHle
3) tmff1e systems ffi8fUlgemefit. Each mea31u=e h briefly deserieea eelew.
..,
I
...
1. TfllHSf'srtatiElH Demand 1fa8a~eme8t
,
The RegieBM Tmll3peftatiell Delft!lfle M!Iflagelftellt (TDM) Pregmm fe6l1ee3 yehiele
emissions BY deereasing heme t8 Vi,'ork and ether .;ehicle trips, and eausing a shift
frem the single aecHfJa-nt aula te e81]3oeb, tmn3it and ethez altemath~e5. This pfegmIH
isaimecl at :reeueiBg eammute tm.;el, travel t8 and irem eaHeges Met uni.."efsities,
llIIe truek tmffie allriflg the peak helll's.
.,
..,
,
m~f i:w~'alve:s gtylemmeftt and Business werlWlg tegether 16 make it easief t6 earpsel,
use transit, walk Me bicycle, ftlla telocemmate. Thuu1ij:lles eE tfle36 types sf sCHaAB
are sffiggerea work aSHls, empleyer pffivided .'8:Bp0618, and e&.Sft ineeatives faf llsiflg
transit.
.,
,
'"'l
i
2. Tmft~aJtati6R Ca~aeity TIJffi8nsion
...
,
The fJ1:lFfJ6se ef this pFegm.m is ta j3Fe'/ie:ie tBe tfanSf)eftatiaR altematives Reeded ta
seweR the ~1 f'Fegmm. The flFegram has f'flay eSftij36Rents: ex.pansian af tf8:f1sit
service, fef fm.ample, eammatey :mil Betwoon Oeeanside ana dewntawn 88ft Diego;
aesignatea lanes fur earpasls ana bases; ana f)fli'k flfta ride 8fld Bicycle facilities. These
pfegffilfts are inemeea in tile RegiellM Tl'IIBSJlertatiell Plall.
j
.,
i
""I
,
3. Tmffie SvstfJlft Malla~elftellt
Tmffie Systelft MllIIagelftcflt (TSM) iml"l'e"..e5 tflIffie flew by deing thing3 !tile
impff)ving the cssfdinatisR af tFt1:ftie sigftals, metering freeway FBHlJ33 and l'rsviding
iflfol'lftatiell fer Ifteterists ell tmffie preblelfts llIIe altemate rellte3 tilrellgh a Regielllll
Tmffie Celltrel Celltel'.
....
j
""I
---
!f11e..In(}stiWpOl;tanfrecottUnettdt::d a~9nsllt~s~~~low;
14MlJsl;i AcuQlI!i
.,
J
....
.,
,
a~ ......r;::r:~d~~~;:ri~til~~;~~~?;~~~~~~:r~1o~f.
1
I
""'I
8
/ LJ ~~ '7
""I
l
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!$.l
p;
~~I1~!l!i~!l,~~~t1~f9t~~~Y~~9pm~t~~~#9P~mi~~pii99Y~'
9
/ '1-J--r
...
g;.!llIi1.iltlll~IIII~~~I~fl!ilmlfl.
_lftllpm~~~~t8~~~~IIm&m~.&I
I;I!'&~!!~H~_~~;'~I~g~:II~I~IJi.mtI~~li..IIl~~
-
~iII_I~1i~I~~llIg!m~YI~I?!!tjlffill_..Ilt@~!~I_x
t!;li\~!I!I~.~E~~f!u;I\Y~x~[~mmlll!~g!!~!
Pi!I:I'!:!lp~el!!:~9tp..I~ilII\.!!!mj.lI!
gi~m~!9Xi;llir~.~~9P~~t!:!~gm~tt9jl~m;~y;~ti
....
...
,
....
1
.,
j
.,
,
,
.,
J
.J
1
j
.,
i
....
,
,
,
...
l
1
i
.,
,
,
.,
J
....
,
~
.,
;
,
,
j
...
.~
10
/~r;~
..,
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRANSPORTATION/IIII..II..II....
SYSTEM AND ])~IA:NJj1\lANAC:gM:gN't
POUCy:~~Q~t;~~m~m~mgHi~E~~$!~I~lim
REDUCE TRAFFIC CONGESTION .. .. . .. . .. .
Introduction
The region's transportation system is a key to our quality of life. Freeways, streets and
roads, buses, trolleys, trains, bikeways and walkways are all necessary to accommodate
our needs and desires to travel. Our work, recreation, education, health care and many
more daily activities are all dependent on our ability to get around. The region's vibrant
economy has led to more and more travel in recent years - travel has been increasing at
a rate higher than population growth over the past decade. However, people's needs and
desires to travel are starting to create problems.
First, the region is running out of money and space to build the facilities to accommodate
all this travel. Congestion is increasing, making travel less enjoyable and efficient. When
we use up too much of our time trying to get from here to there, our quality of life suffers.
Second, the growing amount of travel in the region is causing problems in other areas
important to our quality of life. Air quality is one example. The air quality section of the
Regional Growth Management Strategy contains a program of transportation actions to help
improve air quality by reducing the use of motor vehicles. This transportation section of
the Strategy concentrates on standards, objectives and actions that will better manag-e our
transportation system to provide people with as much mobility as possible, while trying
to limit traffic congestion.
Quality of Life Standards and Objectives
The Quality of Life Standards and Objectives for transportation are being developed locally.
These objectives emphasize managing existing transportation facilities to meet increasing
travel need, rather than simply building more and more facilities. There are four
transportation standards and objectives. $fi~I~I~mrlmB~p9lm.Bq~is~H9P
~~~Pt~~mtB~);>)'
1. A level of service standard for the region's arterial roads. Level of service is a measure
of the traffic congestion on a road. Arterial streets and roads carry a significant amount
of traffic traveling from one community to another. They supplement freeways or
11
FI-30
-
substitute for them in travel corridors where no freeways exist. The arterial level
of service standard is Level of Service D. fAjHstRl6llts eemlEl be RlaEle te the 16'iel
sf Bef'Viee WHere mitigatiea measu.res hft'lle beeR a~lied ta minimize esngemeft and.'er .,
o~leffiding seew af eesftemie benefits te the jtuisdietieB ean Be itJentifJ:ed. fJii,ygp "~
1116_III_fll;lIl1_ul~[II,,~m!.,.~1 ~
...
2. A level of service standard for the region's freeways. This standard is Level of Service
D ~
.
.,
,i
...
0/
~~
3. Level of service standards for the region's transit systems. These standards are:
a. The frequency with which buses and trolleys arrive at bus stops and trolley
stations -- 10 to H ~R minutes depending on the type of transit service involved
and the area served;..
.,
1
..,
.
b. The proportion of the region's residents served by transit - 50% of the region's ..,
housing units should be located within 1/4 mile ofa transit route and 80% within I
1/2 mile of a transit route; and
c. Standards to minimize any inconvenience to transit passengers when they are
transferring between areas served by different transit operators.
.,
s
4. Objectives contained in the region's TFlIRSf'sFtatiSB DeRllHle ManageRlellt nIPQ~~
II'BUBL;&ini~9~~IEili~~49P~~~Y~DIBlI!ljqB~P9~!
1
.
a. An increase to at least 1.5 peeple ~t~Qn~ per vehicle on the region's freeways
and arterials by the year 2000, aDcfio1.6 by the year 2010; .,
.,
,
.
b. The same driye aleBe miss for peeple .mgtli:tln~~t~!;II~~f9r
traveliflg to colleges and universities; RIle mereases ii1 the percentage of students
of these institutions who travel to school using transit ~!1,!:!H!9m9~~ to 12 %
by 2000, and 22 % by 2010; .... ........ .... .......... ..
.,
j
c. A 25 % reduction in commercial truck traffic during rush hour (~~iI~P!lP9~)
by the year 2000, and a 35 % reduction by 2010.
...
,
j
Meetmg these standards and objectives will require many of us to change our travel habits.
Carpooling and transit service will be much more accessible and efficient to use in many
1
.,
I
J
12
/i~) I
""!
1
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
areas of the region, and many more people will choose them. While traffic problems will
not go away, increases in congestion will be minimized despite continuing population and
economic growth.
Recommended Actions
The recommended actions necessary to achieve the Transportation Quality of Life Standards
and Objectives are, or will be included in the Regional Transportation Plan. There are tMee
~9~ major recommended actions for achieving the transportation standards and objectives.
these are the same recommended actions that are described in the preceding Air Quality
section: T!'llIlilflElflfttiElH DeHumd Mll:IIagel1lellt, TfllHilfleftatieH Capaeity EJtfllH13ieH ll:IId
...............................................................................!il........................
13
;1rJ:2-
-
...
WATER
..,
I
..,
POllCY: ENSURE A SUFFICIENT SUPPLY OF WATER, AND IMPROVE mE
QUAUTY OF OUR BAYS, RESERVOIRS, STREAMS AND GROUND-
WATER
..,
;
Introduction
..,
;
,
The San Diego region depends upon imported water supplies. In 1990, the San Diego County
Water Authority (CW A) purchased 95 percent of its water from the Los Angeles-based
Metropolitan Water District. This water comes from the Colorado River and Northern
California, and is distributed to the CWA's member agencies which supply water to 98
percent of the people who live and work in San Diego County.
..,
~
"'"
~
Because of our dependence on imported water, the availability of a sufficient supply of water
to serve the residents, businesses, institutions and agricultural uses of the region is very
important to our quality of life. This fact has become more apparent as the drought has
led to the adoption of regulations and restrictions on the use and delivery of water.
..,
.
....
:
l
..,
,
J
Water quality issues are also important to the region's quality of life. We need to clean
up, and keep our reservoirs, ~~~9JPt~9i; bays and estuaries, and year-round streams
cle~.f?r recreati?~~l.~?other uses. Groundwater supplies should be protected q
_~~UiI1~~i~~;;i~[~i;TI~i':u~~~/~~~a;ie~ses I?r
..,
,
1
,
Quality of Life Standards and Objectives
""I
'.l
J
The water standards and objectives can be divided into two categories, lI"l&i:laeil:ity ~i!~Y
and quality. The standards and objectives for ftvailaeil:it)'~i!!~are setlocall)', Primarily
~~I~~~~~iP~i~~i~llt~llalli~ffll;[I~lt41IIIIIi_l!li
~l'il;x" Water quality is the domain of the federal and state governments. ... ..
.,
1
..,
;
I
1
..,
14
I { / J)
.,
i
;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Water A-vftHllbility ~9PP!Y
The ft"/ftHlII:lility ~Wimty of water depends on feHf!il~ components: s1IW1y, eaftsef\'lItiaft,
it~.;;~~i~;_~~~~!~~~ar~=!?!'!~~~!~~~~~~!t!~
water, we must be concerned with both the short-term and long-range aspects of water
B:vftHlHlili~ ~,\!pp!y. Both are addressed in the following standards and objectives.
1. .'. SI:Iffieieftt slIWly ef wllter sketlld be pf6'/ided ta seNe tile l'esideBts, bHsmesses,
mstimtisBS and agrietllmml uses in the regieB easoo eft tile inlfllememaaefl sf the
CaHill)' "'liter .~.HtllElrity's Pi'/e YeM Callservlltioll PfagfftIR ftIId DfElIIgftt ReSj:}allse
Pregfllffl.
~ii_lll1lil_~lIiililfll'llllltlm.i'I~ImJ.~!i
2. Annual per capita increases in water use should be stabilized and, if possible, reduced
-
3. ~~~,IW,~.Pf9$~ID,~~n9,pljl.~~lmi!~!I~~1PiB!H~~~g919f
p.H~ilig Gqne hundred thousand acre feet of water per year skeHld ee l'eeltHmed
. bY..20iO..!!!.!~~~I~9!W~if~~~~~91'fY_~!W~' IlIterim reelttmlltiall
abjeetives in five year increments~. follow~: 30,000 acre feet by 1995,50'oo9~sr:
feet by 2000, 75,000 acre feet by 200S and 100,000 acre feet by 2010. ~IPPf_~~!Y
!#&iBI~~p~!!!~f~'!li~~~m!j~l!y.Brlp;.)
4. ~~~\Yi'~rigI,8il,~Bn91",\!Pffi! ~he County Water Authority l'eealllllleftds tllllt
its lIlellleer llgelleies ~~9Y)9 be able to operate without water service from the CW A's
aqu:<I~:t~.~?:.. ~R..to...te~.co~~:s~ti~:.d~~s ~~U9~i9c\1!@il'~~q~9F~~~!!9~
~ng~1l9.nt!~rIDPp~~1~9n~~m~!ig~nQ~~#; in tlle evellt ef llII elllergelle)'. The CW A
bn'813S"ui" the' pffiee:ii "af settmgH16agHtem emeFgeBey 3temge gaRb wmek, wReR
adefltoo, willlle added le tlle Strategy.
..~-
~~9H~~~~;
6. Where groundwater is the source of water, sufficient availability should be assured
before additional development is approved. Groundwater supplies should not be
overdrafted i~mHnis~P%9rH9iliI~~~.
15
)i~7i
-
'&ter s1eattily riaiftg e'/er the past 29 YellI5, water title l3er l3erseB lle.s levelell sf( Hi the l3aat
dtree years. III tile fa_Fe, tile 1lfB811M af water BSed per ]lapseD will deeliBe as eeasePVaMsa
beeemes a way ef life Hi setHkem CllIifefllia, Bffeetiftg tiS at heme llftEI at werk.
...,
Watp.r Onality
""'!
j
,
Water quality is regulated by federal and state agencies. Inland _.. surface waters
such as reservoirs, bays, ftftd streams .lDt!:.!~, and ground;;ater'ireiequired to meet
certain water quality standards, as is water reclaimed (from the sewage treatment process)
for irrigation purposes, /I ftftd dischargef! into streams or other bodies of water.
..,
..,
I
Although the Regional Water Quality Control Board is responsible for making sure these
standards and objectives are met, IIII,BIIII water quality is not regularly monitored
by the Board or any other agency. Problems are, however, known to exist. For example,
recent studies indicate the existence of water quality problems in San Diego's bays, ftftd
~~~
.,
..,
;
,*
1
,
Recommended Actions
.,
I
To achieve the water availability standards and objectives, the following actions will need
to be taken by the County Water Authority, its member agencies, and users, such as residents,
businesses, institutions, and agriculture.
..,
I
,
..,
,
1.
l
..,
I
J
,
!
a.
mi__ii!~_I_ent and storage facilities 1I!~q~~_i
..,
,~
b.
Management of demand through eSRsllfVatieR IetFEliits, E1esiga !ltlIBElMds Ii~
e~~!!! e~~~~~it;;~iti_B~~onservation'and
..,
,
c.
Bn!lllriRg the regieR'S SHJlflly fFElm tile MetfeJlatit&B Water Distriet (MWD~ l:ly
aEldressing San Diege' s rights t8 .,iatef room the State Water Prejeet ana the
~fj~~~ii~il~i___I~l.~~~I.#Y
...,
'~
.41
1
,
16
JLlJ5
..,
,
J
..,
iij,.
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
d. :J:?eveloJlIll,7~t of local supplies such as reclamationiiiYfi4'$li!IMlil
~J:!w,m!:!Q# and desalinization, lIRd eSRsideflltieR ef the llse ef gft1y wllter ~~
rlflIIIRIA"I'tllr~!PFEQ~~!mY~nm~\!_9!i
e. Reviewing ii~~g,m~iln!ii9g~~1 state and federall!i!\ii9 policies
slIeillls theSaf.eDrifili:ifii WftterAilt;Stfil:eWllter Pffijeet MdCeBtflN '1l1lley
;.im~*~~.i;l~i'.ii;i:i~\ilritllllr'r~l\!
The W stet" Resourees Plan shaH Be re",iewe6 BY th.e leeal ageBeies ana SMIDt..C floor
t8 iReel'j3sflltieR inte the RegieRIll Crewtil MlHlltgemem Stflltegy.
2. SANDAG should pursue a legislative program which follows and takes positions on
bills consistent with the Quality of Life Standards and Objectives and recommended
actions for water availability.
3. Local jurisdictions should adopt water conservation ordinances including:
a. Xeriscape n9'$!\W;~fM~~lim~lnmg:~ ordinances for all new construction except
single farriilyresidential with privately installed and maintained landscaping,
and agricultural uses. These should be adopted by 1993, and comply with the
~~~.~t!!!~ij~~~~~~fil9!!',!;g!!~1 model ordinance. beiflg Jll'efl1lftlEi by the
DepartHient "ef"')/ater 'Resiiui~ee's~''''''''''''
b. The addition of plumbing requirements, e.g., requiring the insulation of hot
water pipes in unheated spaces, installation of ultra-low flush toilets, etc., for
new construction and remodelling projects.
4. i~.ffij~\YW;~fm!!Si~~ Member agelleies ef the CW f. should implement systems to
compile water use information by customer class to help track the effectiveness of
conservation measures. ~Hm!!9~liWR!!!~!iy~!AI~i~!iiI~.~1'!~~i
5. The CW A, its member agencies and the local jurisdictions should implement the fl~
~~P!i$~!mj1~9gQ~~ (water conservation and demand management programs and
projects) contained in the Water Resources Plan (ellee it is adapted). The actions
of residents, businesses, institutions, and agricultural users will also be important in
managing our demand for water.
6. Te IiElElft1SS tile ellfft18t E1r811gilt, Md lIRY fumre E1rellgilts tile regiell fllllY be IIffeeted
6)', CeuHty V\Tater t.-uthority 1iember a-geneies, resideBtia:l, BH3iness, institutisBa:l,
Md IlgFiellltumlllsers shslIld feHew tile Elrellgilt respollse lletieRs estaelisiled by the
CW f. (see A-tftleilfllent fer OrElillllllee 91 2 Ilew iR effeet).
6; ...........~:~fua:;g~~es;:~Q:::;~:;~~;u~~~~~f%~:;r
17
/'1- J b
....
Ilrlllll~r~1e1l1f_illl_lfm~qii~_~~I~
~
;
!to Member agencies, cities and the County should adopt a water reclamation ordinance
based on the model ordinance approved by the San Diego County Water Authority.
""'I
I
$. Ina~dition to the. st?~ge facilities included in the Water Re~aliree~ Plan iijE
~
9. The CWA saaliM efIaet a ~ resource development offset program 1!.m!~~~I\I\.
which would require new development to pay a fee for the development of new !I!!!'1l.
resources or otherwise offset their contribution to the increase in water use in the
region.
....
~
\
..,
~
..,
ttt For development dependent on groundwater, Ilalieie~ ar ordinances should be adopted
which ensure that groundwater supplies will not be overdrafted.
.,
I
t
...
,
..,
"'l
l
..,
I
;
1
.,
I
...,
.,
..,
f
.
.,
..,
18
,
,
F! <37
....
,~
.
.~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SEWAGE TREATMENT
POllCY: MEET FEDERAL SEW AGE TREATMENT STANDARDS, AND VIEW TIlE
WATER AND SLUDGE BY -PRODUCTS AS RESOURCES RAlHER TIlAN
WASTE
Introduction
Sewage treatment has received a great deal of attention in the San Diego region. Of particular
interest are the court proceedings between the City of San Diego and the Environmental
Protection Agency relating to the level of sewage treatment required by the federal Clean
Water Act. The City of San Diego's Metropolitan Sewerage System provides advanced
primary treatment of sewage prior to discharge into the ocean at the Point Lorna outfall.
The federal Clean Water Act requires secondary treatment. The City of San Diego is seeking
relief from the requirement to provide secondary treatment based on evidence that the
~~1~~it~~~~:;~l~~~j;~;:~~4~;l~c;i;i.III'llill!i
IBIIIIIIII~lr~l~IIIIIIII~".~q~!~~~:I~~~~W~p~y,f
All other ocean outfalls in the region, Encina, Oceanside and San Elijo, provide secondary
sewage treatment.
Quality of Life Standards and Objectives
iiIlIJIJlIiiI
111i~~lii~I!~ml\mj;S~p~8~fmi!~Piy!~t9fI\19i'~!9Pm~9~$9~9~
The Regional Water Quality Control Board requires the disposal of sludge, a by-product
of the sewage treatment process, at an authorized site, and the Environmental Protection
Agency is in the process of developing regulations for its disposal or use. The Integrated
Waste Management Plan described under Solid Waste Management will also provide standards
relating to sludge recycling and disposal.
19
It/--J$'
-
Reclamation of the water produced by the treatment process, is an objective which is linked
with the need to develop additional water resources, and is discussed in more detail in the
preceding section on Water. ...
....
Cost is the primary factor associated with providing secondary treatment, reclaiming water
and disposing of or composting sludge for use. The cost ofthe Clean Water Program which "'I
includes secondary treatment and water reclamation facilities is estimated to range from
$2.4 billion to $8 billion.
Recommended Actions
..,
)
Two other Quality of Life Factors, water and solid waste, are directly related to sewage
disposal. Reclaimed water which can be used for irrigation, and sludge which is considered
solid waste, are by-products of the sewage treatment process.
~
#
Recommended actions for sewage disposal include:
""!
1
1. Agree on the level of treatment required for the Point Lorna treatment facility;
.,
."i
2. .R~~~~~~~~m~U9t~f~~.J*!it~,"W~~.';!mwml;!M!~n~W.~ii!~
.~~P!~~~A~~!pi~~~~i~!~~I,*lim~Ili!.i~lt~l9mmPJ~I~m
m~!f~~~~~r.\\\.qt; .. .. .... .. .. . .. .. . .... . .. .. . .
;t. Include water reclamation plants,~~R~g~~~i~~"'1iJ:l:99IBP~ in the capital
improvement programs of local sewage treatment plant operators !9mlmm~tfi~
~~>>f~t#rR~H9.q9i1.9!:iJ~~~~_w~iI:~~~~99; and .........................................
.,
j
..,
,
,
4 ~o;i~~ ~~~u~~era~~ti:sr~r.~:~i~63al, lIft.s r~ycliI1g ..Elf...sludge..f*ri;!~~.
H~~~q~iq~9~pi8j9r~~...!MIq~~!i!l'!B.t~t'9!jtn~igi~~li9!~Xil!i~*.
pi ..........Bii~IIIIIIII_Il~IIII~IWI~II'rgl~gt~r
....,
j
..,
,
c7:
;
"'!
,
;J
.,
~
"'I
\
....
:
...
j
,
,
,
..,
20
1~-31
"'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SENSITIVE LANDS PRESERVATION
AND OPEN SPACE PROTECTION
POUCY: PRESERVE AND PROTECT OUR SENSITIVE LANDS AND OPEN SPACE
AREAS
Introduction
The protection and preservation of open space in the region is one of the public's top
priorities. As the region continues to develop, public pressure will increase on local
governments and developers to plan for a comprehensive regional open space system. Open
space means different things to different people. To some it means regional parks and
beaches for picnics and ballgames, while to others it means protecting endangered plant
and animal species. From a regional perspective open space means both of these things
and more.
-
IY~rl~9Jfi\Y!n.~m~~ppgDi~.~19~~!mg,p.!!ffi~i1!i!i"~i' .....
A Regional Open Space Plan is being prepared as a part of the Strategy to ensure that we
protect and preserve a variety of open space types.
Quality of Life Standards and Objectives
A "Definition of Regionally Significant Open Space" has been prepared to help identify
the types of open space we want to preserve in the San Diego region. ~~t:ilP~!:m~$
~~~~I~q9119~qj~~ID~~~p~~9t1.!!ffin9wl1mi~fiIl\tI~~~~m9~fn~
~.~t~SX\
Regionally significant open space includes bodies of water and land which should remain
natural, or remain relatively undeveloped or rural in character. The pUlpose of these areas
is to defme and sep3.l'll~~the~~i?ef~~surrounding regions ~i9I1t~.U.#!#s},p~serve
natural resources tN:~_~~~V~~~)' serve recreati??aln~~~~!9P.t.mg) and
provide a contrast to the ur1:JatJizedlirea.s of the region ~~tiM~~). Specific defmitions
for sensitive lands (~~~f!"al~$gVr~_~)such as steep slopes, floodplains and wetlands,
and the other typesofsigiuficant open space are provided in the felleR elltitleEl, "Defmition
of Regionally Significant Open Space."
.
21
J 1- 1(0
-
Our beaches, one of our greatest natural assets and recreation areas, are being studied as
a part of a separate project, the Regional Shoreline Preservation Management Strategy.
This strategy will establish standards and objectives for beach preservation, enhancement
and access.
-
.....
"f
Recommended Actions
....
To protect and preserve our open space areas, the local jurisdictions and other affected
agencies should:
""l
""\
}
2. Reach a consensus regarding how our remaining open space will be used, preserved
and managed;
-
3. Acquire areas designated for use as regional parks; IIfl6
.,
,
~. Encourage agricultural uses M.~III~~~n~I;&m;~;_9~~I~~~;
~. Assist in the mapping of regionally significant open space; 1'9
2
....
,
j
~;II~IIII'III"I~lIt(II,I~r~II'li'II..~~fii~Im
...,
The recommended actions contained in the Regional Shoreline Preservation Management
Strategy will also be included in the Strategy once adopted.
-
,
I
...
1
'"'I
1
I
,
j
.,
...
.,
j
22
....
.~
,
J
.
) ,/-L/ /
.,
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
POllCY: RECYCLE AND REDUCE OUR SOURCES OF SOUD WASTE AND
PROVIDE ADEQUATE DISPOSAL FACiliTIES
Introduction
Solid waste, or trash, is familiar to all of us because we set it out at our homes once a week
to be picked up and hauled to a landfill. Most of us are also familiar with recycling because
a number of communities in the region have curbside pick-up of aluminum, glass, plastic,
newspaper and white or mixed paper, and other people recycle at buyback centers. Less
well known are the recycling activities of business and industry; for example, cardboard
packaging, wooden pallets and scrap metal are widely recycled. New technologies, like
converting waste to energy through burning are now being evaluated as a partial alternative
to using landfills.
Solid waste management is a prominent issue for the San Diego region, as well as the rest
of the state. Today, our region generates about 4 million tons of trash per year, over 11/2
tons per person. Population and economic growth over the next 20 years is expected to
more than double the region's solid waste by 2010. We're starting to run short of landfill
space, and a number of factors are increasing the costs of managing our trash at a dramatic
rate. One example is the additional costs of stronger envimmnental controls, such as lining
landfills to minimize water pollution.
-
Quality of Life Standards and Objectives
The state established solid waste management objectives for each local jurisdiction and the
region when the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) became
law in 1990. This law was passed in response to the state's solid waste crisis. The objectives
of the law are to:
1. Have each city and county reduce and recycle 25 % of the solid waste it generates
by 1995, increasing to 50% by the year 2000; and
23
) 1J -'I d-
-
2. Have all of the 18 cities and the county jointly identify and agree on the facilities
(including new and expanded landfills, transfer stations, recycling and composting
facilities) needed to manage the region's solid waste for at least the next 15 years.
-
'~
Meeting these quality of life objectives will mean that by the year 2010 the region will be
reducing and recycling about 4 million tons of solid waste per year, an amount equal to
the total we generate today. It is estimated that in our region, about 10% ofthe solid waste
is now being recycled.
..,
I
,
,
I
Recommended Actions
..,
~
State law requires the preparation and adoption of action plans -- called Integrated Waste
Management Plans -- by local governments to achieve the two quality of life objectives for
solid waste. These plans will include:
.,
,
1. Source Reduction and Recycling Elements and Household Hazardous Waste Elements
which must be prepared and approved individually by each city and the county by
the start of 1992 (a legislative extension of the current July 1, 1991 date is being
sought); and
,
i
,
,
.~
2. A cooperatively developed facilities siting element of the Plan which must be approved
by a majority of local governments by the start of 1994.
..,
I
The region has organized a policy task force (the SANDAG Board) and technical and citizens
advisory committees to prepare these elements.
..,
,
j
The policies and actions in the plan elements will be very specific. For example, each city
and the county will have to identify the programs, facilities and funding sources needed
to meet the 25 % and 50 % recycling objectives. Reaching these objectives will most likely
require:
""
;t
..,
I
· Continuation and expansion of current curbside pickup of recyclables from households;
,
· More recycling by businesses and industries;
/~
· Major increases in the collection and composting of both household and non-residential
landscape cuttings; lIflt!
1
· More organized and effective efforts at solid waste source reduction, for example, using
less packaging and m9.~ two-sided copying ~~.9Mr~I;ijf&By~~~gpi~~9~YlW
1i!~~~RW!~!49P~;
'lfi'61~lIIillrl~~~fiq~~pm~~~~!M~9t9fPf~9HS~Y.~mimyS!lW
...
,
J
~
.,
.,
..
t
.,
,
24
JI-Lj3
.,
~
j
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!.lIlIS~.Blr~M9i!!!f~i~iMP\l~HBil~m~~19!1~g!~YRtl8~IY~~
-.
In addition, it is expected that at least two new landfills will be have to be built within the
next ten years, to serve the northern and southern parts of the county. Other types of disposal
-
25
li/tjt!
-
-
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
..,
;
..,
POllCY: REDUCE TIIE USE AND PRODUCTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES, AND
TREAT AND DISPOSE OF lHEM PROPERLY
...
r
Introduction
.,
The treatment and disposal of hazardous waste is a difficult task facing the San Diego region,
the state and the nation. Certain types of wastes are hannful to people and the environment
and need to be handled separately, and much more carefully than other waste. Examples
of hazardous waste include used oil, paint, cleaning fluids and pesticides __ all commonly
found in households and businesses -- as well as a number of chemical by-products and
wastes from industrial processes.
,
,
...,
Currently, it is estimated that ourregion generates 135,000 tons per year of hazardous waste,
about 120 pounds per person. While this is much less than the 11/2 tons per person of non-
hazardous waste generated every year, it is pound-for-pound much more difficult and costly
to dispose of. Over 90 % of the region's hazardous waste is created by business and industry,
and the military.
..,
,
.,
J
Quality of Life Standards and Objectives
-
.
Hazardous waste standards and objectives are set by federal and state legislation, and locally
through the San Diego County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. They are:
,
J
1. Treatment of hazardous waste (as specified in federal and state law) prior to disposal
in specially designed landfills called" residuals repositories" and "designated landfills" ;
,
j
2. Reduction of hazardous waste generation by 30% through the substitution of non-
hazardous chemicals and through more efficient industrial operations;
1
,
3. Siting one (large size) to five (small size) hazardous waste facilities by the year 2000.
This objective corresponds to regional and Southern California-wide fair share policies
for providing the facilities to meet San Diego County's hazardous waste management
needs. The fair share policies require that the facility(ies) be located within this region,
or as an alternative, some or all of them can be located in other areas of Southern
California if jurisdictions in our region enter into formal agreements with those other
jurisdictions.
-
1
~
-
t
,
..,
"""
J
26/~~y;
...,
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Recommended Actions
State law requires each County to prepare comprehensive plans and programs for meeting
the hazardous waste quality of life standards and objectives. This County-wide plan, formally
known as the San Diego County Hazardous Waste Management Plan has been approved
by all of the region's cities and the CountYf~q!9l~tl:\i
There are two types of actions for local govermnents in the Plan. The fIrst type affects
local govermnent decisions on hazardous waste management facility development proposals
by the private sector. There are fIve actions that should be taken by each of the 18 cities
and the County:
1.
Use the policies and information in the San Diego County Hazardous Waste
Management Plan when evaluating applications for facility siting;
2.
Adopt the facility siting criteria in the Plan;
3.
Use the general areas identifted in the Plan as the basis for accepting facility
applications;
4.
~!~~~~i~~~I~~~~~~i;~~i~i~1iL~i~r.~'~~~~~~
5.
Use the Southern California Hazardous Waste Management Plan and intergovernmental
agreements and incentives program in evaluating facility proposals.
In addition, local govermnents, led by the County of San Diego, will have to work more
closely with the private sector to provide information, technical assistance and incentives
so that the 30% waste minimization objective can be reached.
27
Ii -L/6
....
..,
HOUSING
.,
<'
POllCY: PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING FOR ALL INCOME
LEVELS
,
,
""I
Introduction
,
Adequate housing, for all income levels, is a basic need of the region's residents. It is an
area where local governments work with the private sector to provide for the region's quality
of life. The San Diego area will have to build 313,090 ~~i. new housing units to house
the additional people we expect to live here in the year26Ie~. This is an average of evef
15,000 .pl~$~. new houses, condominiums and apartments each year. Making sure
that the iessaffluelltmembers of our communities have a decent place to live is also a part
of the region's housing responsibility, and a much bigger challenge than getting the total
housing stock in place.
1
.,
1
""
!
,
Local governments have the main responsibility for seeing that all the new housing our region
needs is built in a way that supports other quality of life goals, things such as preserving
environmentally sensitive lands and minimizing traffic congestion.
..,
'it
J
Quality of Life Standards and Objectives
1
The region's housing objectives are contained in the Regional Housing Needs Statement
which SANDAG prepares every five years. The Statement is required by State law. There
are two objectives in the Regional Housing Needs Statement. Both objectives are measured
over a five-year period, and may change when the Statement is updated. The two objectives
are:
""
~
I
1
,
1. The total number of new housing units the region will need to add by July 1996 __
called the regional share objective. This number is 162,299.
1
2. The total number of new and existing lower income households the region should assist
by July 1996 -- called the fair share objective. This number is 21,728. Assistance
can occur through low interest loans, increased densities that will guarantee affordable
home prices and rental rates, and similar measures.
1
,
I
Meeting the regional share objective will mean continuation of the coordinated efforts of
local governments and housing developers to identify land to accommodate new housing
through local planning and zoning, and to build the various types and prices of housing
that respond to the region's housing market. The region has been effective in meeting total
.,
'j!
j
28
/~-V7
.,
?
'II
,
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
G
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
new housing stock needs in the past, but has had a more difficult time responding to the
needs of lower income households. The region's cities and county, and the state and federal
governments, will have to increase the commitment and resources devoted to low income
household assistance to meet the fair share objective.
Recommended Actions
State lIlY>' feEttlires eaeft eity amI eooaty te PI'eflIlfe a gellentl 131M heusillg eleffieltt whieh
aUl3t eSBtftin the legiaBal shMe eBjeeth'e teta:l. Hew unit:) Reeded ever Ii fh"e Ye8:f ~eflecl,
&nd fB:ir saMe 8ejeeti-ve assisting law inesme h8useaelas e~/er Ii fple year peFiea. The
heusing elelRefits IRlIst ahe ealltaill sUiltegies ME! pregt'llflls thftt will he!fl aehieve bath
eejeetY/es.
~~
2;$h~ti6jjmel&mtllit$$llltUal$b&$iI_tmeljfif~iibj_y~;gI6wim_~
.
29
/i~f/~
.-
j
)
,
""r
,
J
.,
1
1
.,
I
'.'
1
~
!
,
1
..,
;
-
4
\
"
1
..,
\
"'"
.
.,
,
~
i
30 /1-'1;
...
1
j
m~btl!ili
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
~;!.!i~.~
!t.,*~ltnlRY9~~~fi~19Pmm'
s:;~~~I1l.l,py
31
)Lj-5/J
..
,
...
<
REGIONAL PUBLIC
~caITmSllN~cmGMillSITrnG
.,
,
,
""l
,
POllCY: PRO~DE ADEQUATE FUNDING AND SITING PROCESSES FOR
REGIONAL PUBllC FACiliTIES
""'!
The fmancing and siting of regional public facilities is critical to our quality of life. If we
don't have money to pay for needed facilities, or can't fmd acceptable places to locate them,
our quality of life will suffer. Paying for these facilities is expensive and becoming more
so, and the siting of facilities such as landfills, and sewage treatment and water reclamation
plants pose serious difficulties.
..,
'.
,
-
t
'iii
A Regional Public Facilities Financing Plan is being prepared with the assistance of the
Regional Revenues Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee is reviewing the sources
of revenue currently used to pay for regional public facilities, and evaluating potential new
sources including regional development impact fees. Thirteen regional facilities/services
are being studied: water, sewerage, solid waste, energy, hazardous waste, transportation,
justice facilities, regional parks and open space, health, libraries, animal control, social
services and fire protection. The unfunded needs of these facilities/services over the next
twenty years are the focus of the plan. The Advisory Committee has not completed its work.
When complete, their recommendations for funding regional public facilities/services will
be brought to the Regional Board for inclusion in the Strategy.
.
~
~
""'!
j
j
..,
1
-
The purpose of addressing facilities siting in the Strategy is to determine whether we need
to improve existing siting processes and procedures through additional cooperative regional
efforts. Local and regional siting processes for region-serving facilities in the areas of water,
sewerage and transportation are well established, and have proven workable and adaptable
to changing conditions. This is not to say that siting is not often a lengthy, costly and
contentious process. However, these processes do ultimately work most of the time, so
changes are not recommended at this time.
.
.,
1
,j
1
Siting difficulties have, however, been much more extensive and intractable for solid waste
and hazardous waste facilities. In recognition of this situation, the jurisdictions and agencies
responsible for the siting of these types of facilities have initiated efforts to improve siting
processes. For hazardous waste, a Fair Share siting policy was approved as part of the
San Diego County Hazardous Waste Management Plan and Southern California Hazardous
Waste Management Plan in 1989. For solid waste, the region's Integrated Waste Management
Task Force (SANDAG Board and Technical and Citizens Advisory Committees) is working
on siting issues now.
~
~
..,
1
,
.
32
Jt-/-fl
1
1
.
,
J
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
It is recommended that the efforts to improve the siting processes for solid waste and
hazardous waste, as well as ongoing efforts in the areas of water, sewerage and transportation,
ii:,illiililiiHI.illiiiiiiri!~!~I!11
of habitat management and conservation progrnlIlS to siting these facilities should also be
recognized.
33
I //]
J~ rj>r
...
...
\
GROWm RATE, PHASING
AND LAND USE DISTRIBUTION
.,
~
Ii'
:f,
""
.1\':
\i
When the voters passed Proposition C, the Il.egional Planning and Growth Control initiative,
they called for the consideration of growth rate, phasing and distribution issues as part of
the work on the Regional Growth Management Strategy.
""!l
I
The region's growth rate, its phasing and distribution are described in the regional growth
forecasts prepared by SANDAG. The forecasts are reviewed by everyone in the region,
and approved by SANDAG and the 18 cities and the County of San Diego. This growth
forecasting process has been used for over 15 years in the San Diego region. The forecasts
are used by all local governments, state and federal agencies, and the private sector to guide
planning and project decisions.
'"
1
,
1
..,
I
POllCY: ANALYZE REGIONAL GROWlH RAlE FACTORS FOR TIlE YEARS 1990
lHROUGH 20lS~ AS PART OF lHE SERIES 8 REGIONAL GROWTH
FORECASTS
-
....
.\
I
....
The regional growth forecasting process has two parts. In the fIrst part, region-wide totals
of population, housing and employment are forecast over a 30 year period. The development
of these totals involves agreement on specifIc growth rate factors for the region. Starting
with the Series 8 Regional Growth Forecasts, the impacts of growth on the quality of life
standards and objectives will be reviewed along with the forecast numbers for population,
housing and employment. If, as a result of this review it is determined by the region that
local policies to affectthe region's growth are needed, they would be reflected in the forecast
numbers that are adopted by SANDAG and local governments.
..,
1
-
,
"
....
j
,
J
The actions needed to make the policies work would be added to the Regional Growth
Management Strategy at that time and would be carried out by local governments. The
development and adoption of the Series 8 Regional Growth Forecast regional totals is
scheduled to occur between May 1991 and FeeFllary I~Y 1992.
,
!
...
I
..,
'~
\
,
...
'i
.,
34
)il~J
..,
.1
"
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
POllCY: TIlE m:~IONAL L\l'ID USE DISTRIBUTION ISSUES OF JOBS/IlOUSING
B:\L\NCE, AND TR.\l'rSPORT.^.TION CORRIDOR DBNSIl'lBS SHC)1JLD
;~~_t~~~Il:~,~m;;~~~JmH~
RegieaB:!laae use eistMutiea was eermea iB Pfepesitiea C, the RegieftB:! Pllir'_'1iRg llfte
Growth CaRiTal ~{easHre, as the balaaee t:JetWeeB jabs ana h8HSiBg, EllUl traBspertatie8
eoniaer 8.eflsities. These t~;o issue:] "i.-ere idefttiiie8 eeea1:1se they RWte t-he petenti&l 16 1eEIuce
tmffie eeage3tiea, tAe InImber efyehiele miles tm:/elea, eaergy eeas\:lffli'tien and t8 imJ3ff)~(e
our &if' fItlality. The ieea behind these twe petentia:1 :HfRtegies h t6 pffv/ide 1'001316 mere
35 '~!
/~-J L
-
==t::II~ :: ?eftf ;keir jabs, RIlEI better Recess te tl'llllsit.
Hlre e anges te leeallana ase plans.
OilY al-' f
8:f1 ) 51S a these stFfltegies shewe6 that hy 2010:
1.
....
If imple!Reftlea these
1
.
Balaneing jabs ana aeusing has a esif.' .
degree, a.-ir 'itlrtlit).;p ly'S 1fBi3aet ea tmff.ie eSBgestisn ana, ta same
1
2.
~ ~allsiftg inta jab nch llfeliS . .
rich areas; and IS mere effeetl"/e than ms";ing jehs inte heusing
~
,€
,
3.
~Ie./ing nausing inte areas within ~'aDfln distftn . " .
greatest imflre",ementa in tmffie eaB t ~ ~ af light ntH stat:iSftS ~f6f1Hee3 the
ges 18ft ana atr 'i1:lality.
...
I
;
AA ..
. ~leY ~'liewlJIg the fiHeiHgs af the stlIay (366 A EIil .
TeelL'lieal CSffimit:too ~'etea t6 d..~B (3), the Regtenal Crewth.1l&nagement
. . fe6a!R!Reft th8.t jabs 'h . b
eemcler densities atmtegie:; shamEl Bet l3e' I ded . ' 0tJsmg &:lance ana tmnspeFtafisn
S . . mea IJIthelflaftR' lfIlG
tFategy at this tURe. The Cemmittee felt tit t 1:8 wgtel1 rewtk 1lanagemeat
regarding the ecaefIts sf pHFSHing these at ~ e Fes~h aaRe t8 date is ineeRelusi",e
be IIftecltakcft 8.S 8. pm ef the Series g: 7ft al ~':g1es, Itfte that fuRkcy Itftalysis shalll6
ta inelllee theft! in tlte Stffttegy The TtlC~a~ C F6'1\-~h Fereee.st beraye eeeitling whether
19&6 TFEP/el Beha"/ier Survey €HSed in tk.... e I ~1B8Uftee FeeolBmeaded that S",'UIDf..C's
f h ..' e an8. YSlS) be lIJlEllHeEI e th fl .
e t e feHawmg ISSHes be gi~ wen h' h . . ' an at Haker analysts
. tlg pflafity:
1.
""l
"
\
...,
1
I
.,
,
-
j
2.
Is there s eatlsal relatioBship Between jabs and Reusing ha:laaee, aaa tra"/el J'mfems~
lIev.' should jaBs 8flS Reusing halanee be aefmedc:'
....
j
1
$
3.
1.
Within what geeom b' L .
e P He llfeli s,rtlale Jabs Me haasing IInits be bale.fteeEl~
What Sleps eeald Be takeft la pre' 'iee 8. b
types af jabs being Cl'CateEI in 8. p'8.Riealaretter ~8.teh betwtlCft haasing casts Itfte the
llfeli .
What tacties eSlIle bc asee Ie imple!Reftt tlleDe stFategies~
Wh . h . .
, at IS t e l'eteBtlsl f-or lflcreasiHg aeasities Moag transit eerrid ....
0rs.
Should a Fegi8aal fiseal m8a01 Be sepals EI -.
1'8tefltiaJ. lans use ehsnges? . ft8 ta e'. MUMa the fisea:l ~lieatiafls af
~
,!
.
..,
5.
.,
i
f:
6.
....
>
"
,
7.
8.
lIew weak! we !Reniter the iIftplemefttaliSft Me e' -allIate tl1
, . e SlIeeesS af these Sffittt1t;ies~
1ft adaitieB, the Tech.licsl CelBffliMee dhcli3Se6 . .
deteflHined to include regieHa:1laBs use (:I" . , eatens. that eeuls he 8300 if it .,;erc
~~~e~~ eeftsities alSHg tflmsit eerm::tfl~t::ft ~tfll.tegIt1S slleil 8.G jaBo/ilsasing blllltftce
Theso eoole inelllEle: I'S I:ft e egislllll CfflW..II MItft8.gBlHeftt StFategy.
,
...
I
,
'""I'
36
/Y-35
...,
I
I
I
-
,
I
J
I
,
I
I
t
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
1. EB!ltil'iftg that the impleme!lt8.tiaB af these stffttegie3 aee3 Bet H9.Ve 9. BegMi';e fiseal
~8.et ea the teeM jaftsaietisAs.
2. MatehiBg the tytle ef H6usiflg llfe"/iclea '\\'ftft meelRe klelS.
37
1/-5' ~
.~
!
LOCALIREGIONAL CONSISTENCY
..,
j
POUCY: LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS, POucms AND REGULATIONS AND
lHE REGIONAL GROWTII MANAGEMENT STRATEGY SHOUlD BE....
CONSISTENT AS DETERMINED BY 1HE SELF-LbKllf<lCATION PROCESS I
..,
,
In the amendment to the SANDAG Joint Powers Agreement that established the Regional
Planning and Growth Management Review Board, local jurisdictions agree to certify the
consistency of the pertinent elements of their general plans with the Regional Growth
Management Strategy. Regional single-puIpOse agencies involved in the Strategy lla>le alae
1
..,
1
.
"'"
I
1
The following three points are incoIpOrated into the self-certification process:
~
I
· Local jurisdictions should review their plans, policies, ordinances and regulations for
consistency with the recommendations contained in the Strategy.
~
1
· Local jurisdictions should have flexibility in determining their consistency with the
Strategy, with the ability to substitute effective alternative means for achieving the
objectives.
"
.,
· There should be consistency between the Strategy and the plans and programs of single-
pUIpOse regional agencies.
.,
I
The self-certification process has two parts. The first part, the Initial Self-Certification
Process, will occur after the adoption of the Regional Growth Management Strategy. The
following is a list of the steps involved in this part of the process:
~
i
1. A checklist will be provided to the local jurisdictions to help them evaluate their
consistency with the Strategy. (The Consistency Checklist is contained in Appendix
1.)
....
i
I
2. Following a public hearing, each local jurisdiction should me a status report with the
Regional Board within 6 months of the adoption of the Strategy.
-
..,
"
38
JL(-t7
.,
,
J
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3. Local jurisdictions should take the actions necessary to achieve consistency during
the succeeding 12 months.
4. Local jurisdictions should adopt a self-certification resolution after a public hearing.
5. A status report on the self-certification of local jurisdictions will be presented to the
Regional Board. This should occur by the end of the 20th month following adoption
of the Strategy.
Part two is the continuing self-certification process. A summary of the steps follows:
1. Local jurisdiction plan amendments, regulations and other actions related to the Strategy
should require a self-certification fmding.
2. An annual monitoring report on the region's growth and progress in meeting the Quality
of Life Standards and Objectives will be distributed by the Regional Board at a public
hearing.
3. Changes or additions to the Strategy may be made at a public hearing based on local
jurisdiction/regional agency review of the monitoring report.
4. Local jurisdictions should review their plans, policies and regulations based on any
changes made to the Strategy, and follow steps similar to those in the initial process.
Diilflutes llHIeBg leelll jUflselieaeBs Elr regisHlIl ageBeies regftfEiiBg the RegisHal Growth
MIIfi&geffieBt Stffttegy may ee re5EllveelllsiBg S:\NDAG's Ceflfliet Re5sluueB PffieeelllFe
andtl1econructResolUiionProcecture,areoontained in Appendix 2.)
39
Ii-51
,
,
I
I
I
I
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
)1-/-;:;
APPENDICES
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX 1
LOCALIREGIONAL CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST
......:....::.:.:.:..'...,.:...,:,..:,:,:,.,'..:.......,.:.:...:.:.......tt:~\.........,.......:.,..:.."..............:..,'."....:....::.:.'
JilEG. IQNAL.....6B. . .BtwTR.. ...MlllNA1. . . ~. ...~.IrEG. . y.
... .,... "- - - .. .. .' .... .. . ... "."---'
.lili~.!!1111III~11IIi'111II'
TIris checklist is to be used by local and regional agencies to determine the consistency of their
general and community plans, policies and regulations/ordinances with the Regional Growth
Management Strategy 1'~~fig~;"''I!:~. J!1..;BIH;;i!ii!II;mpil9r
ili!~.mI9nl!l~Bsll~9mm~9.lm.lli;:.j'.I.IIlIY.I,!I,~!ll;~,R~1.~
~~..IIl~~i The StfIltegy cefttftin5 II ftllHlBef ef reeeHlHleB8eEl aeaefts wmeilllffoct
leeM ME! regieRM lIgeBeies. This eheeldist will. Be u5eE1 by these ageReies te ll'/afltllte their
eeftsirlteBcy, ME! te ~.~ql!~I;. describe what actions they ~~1!ij.:9;
will aeeEI te take to achieve consistency with the Strategy" .1IlJi!~t~tJiw;.qiiBi!i.
~m,g.~R~.~~".!'Ij.yl;
The questions are lIffilftgeEI 9ft#!),r,i}9 according to the eight ",!1~ Quality of Life factors ~
.........'._".,.',..'_','_'....__' ,'.C..'.-..
i\ff Quality ME! TmnspeflfttieR ceHlBined), ME! ~~q.~;
eglH(W,fi\Mq~n~H~R9~$.~~~~
li}pl!!Jippli!!!mIRD
.1B:.llilll~."mm~l1~I!~.Hy~~~q~R.
!;~~:I1l'!~9qq~{~~l9~~~~~~~~~~.!_~Y~
~gp~}j~IY~.~!
iIr\V~i~i'
........-.....-.-...-.-_.......
,~~w~~,..re:itmerit
~.SensitiVe.Larids. ~anon.a.nd. Opeii~~elition
~ ....Sll~d )Va$te Management
43
! tj~bO
li~'I'.mili~~~~
~1.18
~illl_~lllIpmi~BII.III!I~9~I!I.m~}yRI
III'lI1lm categorized according to who is responsible for answering them; i.e., the cities
and the County, the transit develepHletlt boards, the County Water Authority, etc. The
transportation questions have also been designed to enable the cities and County to self-certify
conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) requirements. .~~ilr
m:.i!..:_~g!!9i~i!i!I!9PiU!i.!llim~m.j:B!llii:~\lgi~!.
!lli~_~i:i.H1g!l1!19.~I~IIlII~~_~I.i'!.Ba~!I.
~.'~..."Fa..'.'..'..'. -....................... ~~~i
..... ......
~.IV~It\If?fi~9!lia~!lI~illli!!!B~~!;9.mII!'!imgm~m~~m!8
9P~9!i~j!!IP~.g9m!liijiU.m!!iI}Ygl\:!g_iiimqI.!mi!n.l_ii
~~I:II~m~q~lm~91i.li.;~.Im!...lIlim!i.I~~iyi
The responsible agency should answer the questions by checking "yes", "no" or "other", I!r~Y
~iiqm~.~if9rm!H9~!m~!!9~~ml9~i A "yes" answer indicates consistency
with the Strategy, and should be documented by noting the ordinance number and date of
adoption, the element of the General/Community Plan(s), or other policy or regulation. A "no"
answer indicates inconsistency with the Strategy, and requires the reporting agency to indicate
what actions will be taken, and a schedule to achieve consistency. An "other" answer should
be used when the question cannot clearly be answered yes or no. Each question is followed by
a line where "yes" answers can be documented, and several lines for comments Rf..I!m!!ie.I.
If more space is needed to explain a "no" or "other" answer, please attach additional sheets.
~p!i!~~i~~m<<~Rf9i~~Ir!lml~ii~F!I~~_9~lfii!~99!~9!i!~.i;iPl
_$~~m~~ij~9~~R~P..;
....
....
...
,
.
~
-
..
.,
"'"
\.
...
""!
.....
1.-
"""
1
'"
t
.,
"'!
,
'-';
,
A list of the documents which ~ will be used in answering the checklist questions is attached
(Attachment -I- f). Copies of these documents are available if needed. .,
,
44
/,-/-C,/
.,
.,
I
.
I
W
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
W
I
I
AIR QUALITY AND TRANSPORTATlON_'IIBII SygTEIVl .\NB DEl\WID
MANAGEMENT
'I'I'8B8pOrtatieB DemllBd M&nsXemeBt lIIIIl!;_I.II__1
Cities and County
1.
Has the Regional Trip Reduction Ordinance, or an equivalent
ordinance, been adopted? Note: The Congestion Management
Program (CMP) statutes require that each city and the County adopt
and implement a Trip Reduction Ordinance.
Documentation:
Comments:
* 2.
Me all ef tIte elemeftts ef the Tfij} 1leEIIleaeB 0rdiBtmee eeiflg
ifBIllemeBtell in yetlf jllftsEiieaeB? lii_IIIlBIiIIII;g
_~;.;iliig!!lIi!;.~I:~_Ei;lIl;.;I_ljlilUmm
IImBl
Documentation:
Comments:
i~IR
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
* _.~ii!~~~~Y~~~il~gll.~ 1~,j!t!19i!l~t
~\!mIg'I9P~~_1Ii111
;,:::,::({:!::::::::::::::=:::=::t::/f:::::::::::{u:ntn:ntP:nt~
::::::t::t~::n:~:t:~:~:::t::::;::::t::::::::::::{
':':':':':':'~:':::':';':':"""-"""""""""""-..... .
.w.w...........,.........
..................,...............
45
)t/~b.J-
:~:~:!j::~!~:~!~~(~:~:~~:~:~:~::~~E:?::~::m:~
..1m:~.I;~~.(i.i~,I~I'II!~li~Y!ti
Cities and County
1.
Are the High Occupancy Vehicle (HOY) lanes 'shown in the !mi.~~t
..,..........'.....,
~ Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) along local streets and
roads located in your jurisdiction shown in your General/Community
Planes)? Note: This currently applies only to National City and the
City of San Diego.
Documentation:
Comments:
2.
Does your General/Community Planes) identify existing and proposed
bicycle facilities and coordinate with other bicycle facility projects
included in the ~qn~#t ~ RTP ~~gi.$~i9.99
~PfPY#ID~~t~?
Documentation:
Comments:
46
FIb}
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
---
""
....
...
""
....
"
....
j
,
J
""\
...
,
,
>
...
1
...
1.
"'"
I
""
"'l
t
...
~
,
....
"'"
I
i
"'\
..,
...
I
,
I
,
1
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
I
I
t
1
.
,
I
. pi .";l?!~;~_tiID!;\~tg~~Pf.~i9~~~(~~DI1!(~~~l
1~~ll~~IB~~...I~~~I~_lll~~~
~~!P!Y9i!!\J~~9.~lmQ~~~~~~!~!ilm~I~Y~;
~aimf\bnj':.""'.'}'.':':"':'i\':\\\.""""""'".................................
,.,.:.:.;.;.;.;.......:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.;.;.;.;...:....;...:::.:......:..........
............................
.......:...:.:...;.:.;.::...;.;.,:.;.:.:.;...;.;.:.:.;
:':';':';'::":';'.
.......................
:.;.:.:.;.:.:.;,...:.;.;.;...::.;.;.:::.;....
......... .... .
...................................... .
................................
;.;.;.;.;.;.".;.:.;...:.;.;.;..;.......;.;.;.;.;..........
.......................................... ......w......................
..............;.;....:.:.:.:.:;:::....:;:.:.:.::::::;:~:(::q:~:,:::::::;:::"::::::'z.,.,............
.... ........ :.z.:~.:
.............."-'.................'............,............
.............,:............ ....
. li~9~_Y_t~q7nil~~~!I!!IPw.jl1~lly~Jgl~q~;
lm9~ql.!m!iyl1~~..I..;~ml.~~~
~lWitlfuhiii{).
........,.................................
.:.:::::::.;t::~:~;!~;;::;;::./::::;;;:;;::.::;.:.::::;::::,::.:,
:::::;::::::::":,:,:,:::::,:,,,:::,:,:;:::::'::.,::.,:,.:.,.:..::::.:.:.,.:............. .....
,.,.:.:.:.'.:.:.....:.:...>,.,..,.:.:.::.......
.. ... .. ........ '.:.:.'.:,:.'., ,.:.'., :.:.:.~,.,.' ,., :.:.:.:.,.,.,...:.,.:.....'.... ',' .
.... .... ...
$~~G
~L
"'.
noCriirieDt3tio.ii: ........... .
...... ....... ..... ..........:.::........
47
/t//bi
)t(esNodtli6r
...........'.....................................
...... .... .
................. .............
........................... ............-
.... ..' ..... ..... ..
.....................................
...... .... .....
....... .. .... .
....:...::.:.:.:...~:.,...~
..
"\li.!".9f~~g~1!'I!.~._~i!.~~'ii1#
l~fI~:mi!~f!'~_flP~$~
.l
....
)
It)Q~eJltanl)n;I
-:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:-:-:.;.:....-...-......,.......-...........,..,.,...
:':':".;.:.:.:.:.:.,.:.;.,.;.:.:.:.:.:.,.,.;.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.;.;.:.;.:.:.:.:.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.,-:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:,;.:.:.:.:.:,...,.....'
':';".;.:.:.:.:.:.,.:.;.:.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.,.:-;.:.:.:.:,;,:,:-;,'.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.;.:.:.;.:.:.;.:::-;.:,;.:.:.:.:.:.,.:,:.;.:.:.:.:..-.......
.... .......... .............. .....-..'...................-..-...........-.'......
............,-..
...
,
~
.
""t
!
Transit Bevel8BIBeBt Boards
.<II
;
,
;
1.
Are the peak-period transit route frequency standards and objectives
contained in your short-range plans consistent with those specified in
the Regional Growth Management Strategy and CMF?
Yes No Other
"'I
i
I
,
---
.,
i
,
Documentation:
.,
,i
Comments:
,
,
""t
,
.,
.. 2. Are existing peak-period transit route frequencies consistent with the Yes No Other
transit perfonnance standards and objectives set by the Strategy and
CMF?
'"'I
J
---
Documentation:
"'I
,
i
...
\
Comments:
..I!I
i
.
,
I
.,
,
,
48 /
) ll-t 7
.,
J
""I
i
.
I
,
I
Ii
t
I
I
I
t
,
I
I
I
I
I
t
r
I
I
.. 1'"
~.,
1Y:~~.m~.~m~)I!;.i.I;i1!;~~.I'!!R9;
~!I!!...~!;~g~~IMI~I~;;I~i~
.. 4;
.m~~~9~ti,9P~t1!~I~;;lIf!~',Bmms;~mqjj.
1~~~~~m~~t1I~~~~I."~~!~~
a:gl~t~
Tl'sBSpel'tstieB SyMem :MSBsgemeBt ~Jiduse~i<l:iiS/lAlveli)tSKVi(e
StandllrdsfGr,~erials lUld Freeways . . ..... . .. .. .. .. ..
Cities and County
1. Are the traffic level of service objectives contained in your General!
Community Planes) equal to or better than those specified in the
Strategy, i.e., LOS "D" for the freeways and the Regional Arterial
System identified in the 1990 RTF?
49 Jt(-6h
~~~~q,gr
~~!~9'Br
Yes No Other
---
Documentation:
Comments:
2. Has a traffic forecast been prepared based on the land uses and Yes No Other
circulation system contained in the General/Community Plan(s)?
Documentation:
Comments:
3.
Do your traffic forecasts make use of a SANDAG-approved traffic
forecasting model and incorporate SANDAG's Regional Growth
Forecasts as a uniform benchmark for population and land use data?
Note: TItis is a requirement of the CMF statutes.
Yes No Other
---
Documentation:
Comments:
50 ) i ~? 7
...
"'"
'"1
I
<
""l
"\
"'I
I
l
""l
...
~
,
.
..,
I
,
..,.
1
J
1
j
,
.,
,
.,
"'"
I
}
...
J
..,
..
,
J
"
j
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I'
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.
~~lI~p_lI~tj~~~I!:!~.~!:!~I~~IIII!j!~~
Di~I!l\!~IiI~!iIY~tit;.!~';';!IlgIItltmB
~~mgytfDoes your jurisdiction have a program(s) to achieve the
traffic level of service objectives identified in the Strategy?
It!tf*;:m~..~Y!r'I'g~!mI~9:_~.!iii:!~
Ix~ll!.!B~~l~I~~q~m~.II.~~~I.!.~~
~ili;~!i9m;IIIli.;I';\tlfII!i;!liYii~g
~.flI9m~I~I~_m!~.9~9!J1.wv~i
Documentation:
Comments:
5.
Has your agency adopted and implemented a process to evaluate and
mitigate the traffic impacts of !.iil.~ fftlIjef projects on the -l-99G
regional transportation system, including the level of service standards
and objectives of the CMP and Strategy? (The definition of al!!li~!!
"majer" project 1~$n~~~s..I!!MP'!RJI~..~~~I1!!'~~~
9R!m;l1~gfii~lni:!l;i~~~~~~~~l!Il!.~~f
g;~9fm9i~Y~mi~~!~y~~gr*!:IRIm._~~Y#W$1
Ip~} is the eRe lISe6 by CEQA and in tile Memel'lUlElllm ef
URderstandiHg among tile loea! jllRSElietiollS fer notiHealien of land
IIse and E1evel8flmeat aetioRs by the C8IIIlty ef San Diego anEl the
eities.) Note: The CMP statutes require that each city and the
County adopt and implement a program to analyze the impacts of land
use decisions, including mitigation costs, on the regional transporta-
tion system.
51
Jt/ -bY
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
Documentation:
Comments:
6.
Does the process include the traffic impacts on all freeways and the
regional arterial system affected by the project (including arterials and
freeways in adjacent jurisdictions)?
Documentation:
Comments:
7.
Does the process consider existing and future planned land uses, and
reasonably foreseen projects within the jurisdiction, and adjoining
jurisdictions?
Documentation:
Comments:
52
J~r&/
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
""'!
...
..
,
.j
"'!:
...
,
i
1
...
1
.
..
,
,
i
"Ii
I
""'I
.,
'!
l
...
f
.
"'!
ift
,."...
"'i
l
'J
""'!
.
,
~,
4j
1
,
"'1
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
l
,
I
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
· 9.
8.
Does your agency prepare and adopt CMP Deficiency Plans as pll:l't
af tile majar projeet RPllraval. flfeeeas if fli any state highway or
CMP principal arterials ~m.x9iiln!.~n.~ are forecast to
fall below the CMP traffic level of service standards? Note: The
development and adoption of Deficiency Plans is a requirement of the
CMP statutes.
Documentation:
Comments:
Is the existing traffic level of service on the regional arterial system
routes (in the 1990 RTP) in your jurisdiction consistent with the
Strategy's level of service objective of LOS "D"?
Note: If a roadway !:J9~~ will not be able to meet the Strategy's
regional level of service objectives for specific reasons such as
preservation of landscaping, inadequate room to widen, or other
overriding considerations, these exceptions should be explained.
Documentation:
Comments:
53
/</-7;/
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
CALTRANS/SANDAG
.~; Is the existing traffic level of service on the iIIl,~~ freeways witIlifl Yes No Other
your jllriBaietiefl consistent with the Strategy's level ef seFYiee
objective of LOS "D"?
Documentation:
Comments:
2;l~l~p!V.I~~'~....~~.~~_R!~Y~!l'il?lgjm~l.l~ iI~.'ft!g!!!~
.li~~R9I~~I~j:p;~~l!-m~,9!?j.xSg~~~I~i
~.J:taU~lJ. ~Y#em..~n~gement
Cities ..WJ C9inity
l.
Is there a plan in place to optimize the traffic signals in your
jurisdiction to improve traffic flow through a centralized traffic
control system?
Yes No Other
54
jll7!
.,
"""
.,
,
i
.,
t
,
.,
.
..,
.I
..,
"
"'I'
!
j
...
I
.
""
I
"
....
.,
1
i
.,
i
~
I
I
...
,
.,
j
...
1
,
.
1
;j
,
j
i
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
,
I
I
I
Documentation:
Comments:
.. ~1;.I~i~~'I_~~~9!~iII~~~ii1lPplij~
~~.;t'"
w.....................................'.-..........,............................-.- .
.:<.:.:.:.:.;.;.;.;.,.:.;.
.......w.y...;..................
:.;.:.:-:.:.:.,.,.:.,.,.:.:.;.;.".:.:.:.:.:-,.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,..'...;.,.;.,.;................
..............,.....-......
~~~$'I~~A<i
........,-.--.................-_.................---...
.. ~;I~ix~~~.}Y~xlmp~_ll:If;:I~ImR'se~!l~9~~
.. 2; ,'.'.~tuli(;aW'. thc;iwplementati()~ ..st;lt1J$():f~~gi~1):!jm<;g9n~1
9en~f;'th~pii.i;pO~..9f.whicl1..'..w..'.'t9'P[()~19t()~~bftraffic
~~ble~slii1dalWniate vehiCle. rOUtes:
55
JLj- ).,2
~~~ql~t
""
"'I
...
,
"
.~~u~
.,
~
IJ.~~m!m
..,
f
,
m;B..iPm~gm\~!.,I~!~III..i~.!I~!I..lt~;lii ~~Ii~qgi'
1~~II~li,:~~lill;lIn~m~x..~m.II_ilIIY~n.i\~.9
1111111~lti!.Il!I~~p.!
1
,
...
,
,
~.;..".~~.~~ti9g!mg,I..~~i!A~.Yi~.iU
.ilI!.~R~;
...
;
,
.
~~!m'~9.!l;r
':':":',::':',:::,::'::'::',:,::':::;:'::::,:.:::::::::;:::::;:::.:.:.,.:<
..................................'.........w..........,...,.....
......................................'.............
...
,
,
,
....
$'
.,
I
,
...
.,
... ~J':QllijtiQn ~lDistritt
.
...
~t!~~I!iIm~~~~B~~~Rrrl~m!i~.l~!ym~.B!ji~.i~
t~~uq~.
~
I
.
1
,
""I
,
56
1
I
)CJ -7;3
"'!
i
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
WATER
County Water Authority
I, Has the County Water Authority adopted a Water Resources Plan.
!.~m;I!'RIY~.~ which fly~ lifts been reviewed by the
local jurisdictionsi~~IHB)JN!,~n~i and includes:
a) The construction of delivery, treatment and storage facilities;
Il~~~mjSl!jji~~;in~._!~.~;
b) Management of demand through .:H~~~il!I.~
eSRseF\,lttiell. I'etfeHts, desigR stftftllMds and other measures
contained in the Conservation and Demand Management
element Ig'l~tl~I~!in;
c) ~mqn!:il;li;!Wl'!!1 BnsllFiftg the regieR'S illlWly frem the
Metropolitan Water District (MWD) ~Af;i.~ffii:l
~1.liim~~!lI~IPl\'I!~g~WlI BY Ildtife~siBg 8llfl
Diega's rights ta water frem the Etftte Water Pffljeet ME! the
CeIsmde Rb'er Aquoot:1et;
d) Development of local supplies such as reclamation ~W~~!f
~m~lj~tllli~qgi;! and desalinization i'~~i1i9
~mm99:p~~'@,t~~#I~9!!~i!mm~Wl,!mmi!m~~~i
~l!~pllitying~~!P9#SY~~9~B9!!!!; and
e) Reviewing state and federal ~W~, policies lltIeh Il~ the Safe
Drinlcing Water ,Aet, 8Htte Water Pf'ejoot and CefttftH 'llaYey
Pf'ejeet as they relate to the region's water supply.
Documentation:
57 /i~71
Yes No Other
""l
Comments:
~
* liI~llgl.i~It~.!I_pl~~~y.
..,
,
~
~~!
.,.:.,.:.:.'.;.:-",:.;.;.;.;.:.;.:.;.,.;.:.'.:.,.;.,.'.;,;,;,;,;,;,:,:,:"",:,:",;",,:;:::,::,::,:';';"'"
:.:.-.:.:.:.;.,.:.:.:.:.,.;.:.'.:.,.:.,.,-:.:.;.:.:.:.:';';';':':"'-':':-":';-"""'.:::':'::;::.:.;.:.,.:.:.;
I:~:Y ..H:H:::::~::::;::n:::}:t ...
...
* ~liIiililli9~..11lI1tll.RlIi~'~li.l.
1E!~~_Pi!~.!I~~~fj~.lII1i~..~.~
..
1
m.~!l!!l!:ml""""
...'.'.'.'....'--..'-.....-....-...;.,.;.;.,...:.,.;.,.;.;.;-,.-.;.;.-.;.:;:,...........-.......-.-.-.-.-.-.-...-.......'.....'.....".-.........-.-.-.-.-.....'.'..'.'.....'.>:
:'::::":"';":':;":"':':::;::'::;:"',::;:;:.,,:.:;,;:-:;,;::,;:::;:::;:;:;:::;:;:::::;:::;:;:,:::::::::;::;:::::::::":::':':;":::::':::';:::::::::'::::::::;::;::;::;::,:,:;::;,:::,::::::;:{;;:;:::::~::;:::::;:::;.;':.,.;...'.......
...
,
-'l'
.
~
'I
~!imlt.~.llg.~IRI~~IHp.~I_g~.9f I~llg_f
19~!l!.im_II!!I!!I~~I~li~iXi'll_iI~l~~1
.g~~~~m~~!!m9~9~~~BI!l1~.~~1
"'I
J
..,
,
1
,
j
'"'!
~"-'-'!
,
'.
5. Has a resource development offset program been j.jj:!#~~. aEl~te6 Yes No Other
by the CW A which requires new development to pay a fee or
.,
-;1'
otherwise offset its contribution to the increase in water use in the
t.!
region? Wftati$tll~statiiSQf tills pQ(~il1P~p?
,
,
;~
Documentation:
""'I
,
.
.,
58 ) Lj - 7 f
-'i,
-
#;
I
'.
I
,
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
Comments:
SANDAG
Has SANDAG undertaken a legislative program which follows and takes
positions on bills consistent with the Quality of Life Standards and
Objectives, and recommended actions for water availability?
Documentation:
Comments:
Water A2encies
I. ~1~~~r~j~99fllimm91~1P6~~m~IR~'Pi" Have tile
drought response fI~l~ lletiell3 feEtlIife6 BY tile eliffellt CeuRty Wllter
Aut1lefity eFdmllflee Beall impl6IR6t1tea l$Pp~ll$h;p~$!I!l~~
W.~~~g~*'?
Documentation:
Comments:
59
F/~7~
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
2. Are CWA member agencies able to operate without water service Yes No Other
from the Authority's aqueducts for up to ten consecutive days?
Documentation:
Comments:
3.
1I!~\Y~m~~i~:lIfl lias a systeHI. BeeR implemented iixll\l
to compile water use information by customer class to help track the
effectiveness of conservation measures?
Documentation:
Comments:
4.
Have the ~~~~~~8!mlw;~~(water conservation and demand
management programs and projects) contained in the CWA's Water
Resources Plan been implemented?
Documentation:
Comments:
60 J
)7-7;
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
"'!I
1
,
.,
l
...
,
1
"'"
-;
i
"
.0\
i;;!
.,
i
,
~
.,
"'l
oj
<
.,
,
,
.
"'l
";
i
.,-
,
,i
.,
;
.,
,
;
.,
i!
~
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.'
J
I
$;.~'W.i;~lij~~~;.~~~I~.!I.~.!1I)1I~.~ )tp~~q!inm!t
Iq1l19n;;im9!!~l9~__!i9~
~!i~g9P;r
.. ... ... ..... ..... "." ..............~:.:.:':.:.:.:.;.:......
"--',',', ......-., ...
:.:::.:::;:::,,:;,:,;,:,::;,,:;:::':;:::::'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::":":
... ........-..-.. .
:.:.:.~:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.....:.:.._............,.... .
...............................,..............w................
...............................................
Cities and County
1. Has a water reclamation ordinance based on the County Water Yes No Other
Authority's model ordinance been adopted?
Documentation:
Comments:
2.
Has the State Department of Water Resources model xeriscape
ordinance, or an equivalent ordinance, been adopted for all new
construction? (This also applies to landscaping for single"family
residential units installed by developers prior to occupancy.)
Documentation:
61 ;<1- '7 %
Yes No Other
Comments:
3. Have you amended your local plumbing requirements to be in Yes No Other
compliance with the minimum state requirements .;i,li~
~.""""'.'."'."'aaii').,
....................................
...-.................
Documentation:
Comments:
4.
~I!I~l?n~n~.9i~_I!m~i~ Is there 8. Jlreeesa iB Jllllee
te \'erif)' that a sufficient supply of water is available for development
dependent on groundwater M9~~~IiJ.~iRPllllmB~~
py~{4~? .~.9,\!p~gpllPlii~~.~!pmqi;m!!it!i~ll!m
l\y~9ti!A~tm~t~~~~g9;gr{!!!~!f!IN:Stj)
Yes No Other
Documentation:
Comments:
· $;~y~t~~~~91~!i9l<Bm;R9P~~M9m~q
~g~~nlBf9~~~9R~J.1Fgp~m~~lffl\I~I~I:~~.i;
~~9!!~~~!~~9.m~9~~~
62 JLI- 7 (
,
,
.,
-
.
1
1
"\'
1
I
,
I
.,
,
I
.
,
.
..
...
~
1
-
,
,
.
..
.
"
-
j
1
-"l
,
..
1
,i
"'!
...
\
}
..
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~;I
.,.,.;.;.;.:-:.;.:.:.:-:.;.:.;.;.,.,.:,:.;.;.,.,.:.,.,.:-:-:.:-,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.,.;.:.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.,.:.,.:.:.,.:.:.:.:.,.:.:.;.:::.,.:.:.,.:.:.:.:.:
..-.-....,......-.-,-.................,.........................,......-...................................................................-....,..........
._..._'..,....._.............,'....,-....................,..,.:...:.:.,...............,......,._w..,.........._....'.-.......
........................... --................
................................
...........'..............................................,.............,'....
. ......................
~;Igl!~.RliS9~tll:.lll!mtt!mIjJ_1111~tI
~~~'1~i'!~w~.~I1~_~p~_glm~9
~~~.li~~~[I~tI~~li~I.lgI_qII\\'!!.m~i.y
_1
SEWAGE TREATMENT
City of San Diego
Has the level of sewage treatment for the Point Lorna facility been
~HPRij 1'eselved?
Documentation:
Comments:
63
/t.j~ytJ
l~f3'q .II~r
Yes No Other
~;i~!~~.x!i~ipP,~RI#!I!l1E!.I!!I~I.~~~ ~ll&~q~~r
!q~i~q~~9lii~I,~_~~g{:~m!lm_
!m~l1~~I~~ii?'\!!~~I;i!lpl*IliI~llg'i'gi~t~
gj.i!~~p;: '
::.:::.:::::::::::::::~.:.:,:.,
.,.z.;.;.;.;.;.:.:.:.;.;.;.:_:.:.:.,.;.
:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.,.:.:.,.:.; ...
::::::::;:::::;:::;:;::::::::::::::::::<
.:-:.:.:.:.,.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.,.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.;.:.;.;.;.
............................-.-.-...............................'
.....................
:.:-:.:.;.:,",:.",:.:.:.:.:.'.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.'.:.:.:.:-'.;.......;.:.:.;.,
11I_~~;.
-.....-.'.....'...'.....'...'.'...'..,',-.-.....-...-.-.-.-...-.-...-.......'.'...'.........-.-.-.-.-.'.-...'. ...'...-.'.-.-...-.....:...........'.'..,....-,........-.-.'.-.-.'.-.'.W.'.'.'.
............... ....... ....... ......................, .................................w.w....
::;,:::::}::::":::,::,::",::":::,,:,,::,:,,,:,,t,::,:::,:c",,::,::,,:::::,:::::,:,:::,:::,,:::,::,:;,:;:,::::::,::,,:::,:,:t;,:::;:;::;,';;;:;;:::::~::::::::::,;:::::,::,.::,.:".;.:"
Sewal!e Treatment Plant Operators
Have plans for water reclamation plantsi~9.;m~lgti!lI~I\I~
and iqll~~ sludge disposaUrecycling facilities been included in the capital
improvement programs of the sewage treatment plant operators?
Documentation:
Comments:
Cities~ ~riiinty
."......,.................. .....
bOesyOi!ijurlsdiCtion .lJavegUl!ri!ntee(ttieatl,,~~.vagi~y; ipr ... dilell... it
~O!1trilt;tw~th 8nothet: agcit~y .foi .city,prlQito .#pprqvUig d~~l<iptrient
projects '
64
JL!- ff/
Yes No Other
[YciN60ther
......--..---...............--...".
...
,
....
...
"'l
"'l
.,
"'l
...
...
...
..,
...
.,
...
...
...
...
...
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SENSITIVE LANDS PRESERVATION AND OPEN SPACE
PROTECTION
1~~~l~l!~,ffA\llj~;M~!~~j;~g BI~~~I!!:!;'g~_~
(i.l~g~ . . ..
Cities and County
1. Have ordinances been adopted which FeElHffe tile eensistetlt tFelltment
Elf stOOj'l sl6fles, f1Eloapl&ias ltIla wetlltllas by iReltiaiRg tile elements
ltIla Sfleeille FeElHirements !!I~p~J~I~~~II~elIBI
contained in the Strategy's Definition of Regionally Significant Open
Space f9j'i
It .:;:';'.:;.:'~~1P~19ti~~ 1~~9~.~I
65
Fl-- F:L-
t/;ID.i.
~!:m~(!qn;r)t
::;;:::::::{f}:{:::I:::ru=:w:ttmt:tff}IIttttJ
......"........".
........................,..........-...................................
..................................
...........................................................,.....,....
.........-..-.....................
..............................
~:::::::::::::t::::::;:;:::,.;.:.;.....'..
Cmii_ts:?
...............,-..............
.....................
tt//i))J/{::i{)}{ft:irmn
..........w.
:.:.~:~:t~::~:;::?
:,;:{:?itt=:
:::::::;:::::::::::::::;,=::::::::::::t::;:::::::::;:;:;:::.,.:.;...........
.:.:;:.,.;.;.;.;.
........,.....;.....:.:.:.,-:.:.:.:.:.,:.:.:.:
~*I.:~~$
2.
l~gi~9:mmii
Yi.liN6HXiltliei
;';';"':;;:';"';";':':':.";"<":'::";"':';",:,:,:.;.;."......'-'..,.'-.
Are actions being taken to acquire lands within your jurisdiction Yes No Other
designated in your General/Community Plan(s) for regional parks?
Documentation:
Comments:
66
/i/?3
..
....
..
.,
..
J
""J
..
..
""!
...
fl
..
...
....
...
.,
...
..,
""!
...
,
"
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· $]!I!I\.~~~m9~~_I:.I;.1I;l!iI;IY91
miill99~
lIIi.til?ni...t .........::..:.:.t..+.::::;:;:.:::::.::....:........................ ..
4. Are actions being taken to encourage the preservation of agricultural
uses mm:.tij~mP~~1
Documentation:
Comments:
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
Cities and County
1. Has a Source Reduction and Recycling Element been adopted ~i:!
~_~~*?~~~~~9~9nw,~~~il1~~~p~.quq#1
_~~gf pllrSlIlIflt te AB 939 as a part ofthe county's Integrated
Waste Management Plan?
Documentation:
Comments:
67
JL!-YJ-/
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
...
!a;,;~m~~~~~~~~~~~Ulf!I.~iiK_J1ti~~;
"'"
~_iii.ili:r
""'!
"'I
~;m~~rI9~~~191~~~P!~~I'iI.IImllmtIi.~.:.Jjjg !!!f:l,~9)IIlfiji
.~~lJg~g~~~~~ ...
~lNm!AAi~t!9';)
::?}::?~:::::::;::;::;:::::\.::;)?t::::::j:::::::::::::::~:~::j::;::::m:
..,:.:.,.:.:.;.::::::::::::
..,....;.:.:.;.:.:.,."."...,
,,::::,,':,:,:;::.;.....::,:.:.:,:...
""'!
,
.....,....................................'...................................w
........,................................
................ ......................
-
,
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.,.,.:.,.:.
.:.:.:.;.:.;.:.:,,:.:.-.:.:.:
....,...,........................,
............................
.:.:.,.:.:.,.:.;.;.,<...:.;.:.:.;.........
-
......................
.........................
..........w_.,.................
...,
~.
...
"'"
-
~6lt.~i:l~i
.,
...
-
)
Comments: .. . . .. .
'"'l
"'"
"'"
68 ./
/ G/~F!7
,
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6. Has the Siting Element for solid waste disposal facilities required by
AB 939 been approved? (The Siting Element is required to be
approved by the County of San Diego and a majority of the cities by
the beginning of 1994.)
Documentation:
Comments:
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
Cities and County
1. Has the San Diego County Hazardous Waste Management Plan or an
equivalent been adopted as required by state law?
Documentation:
Comments:
2. Have facility siting criteria that are consistent with the San Diego
County Hazardous Waste Management Plan been adopted?
Documentation:
69
/L(~f'?
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
Comments:
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
-
-
-
..
!
""!
.,
j
,
...,
'"'l
..
.,
.,
.,
,
~
..
..
,
.,
,
.,
\
.,
,
1
3.
Has a RI~91~iIp.~~&I!~~({!'liI:_lIf11!1~t.i~ii
Conditional Use Permit~, ar ether preeeElllFe been iMlllliJ IlElepteEI
for pftleessiRg .8 facilit!~y pemlits?
Documentation:
Comments:
4.
Are the Southern California Hazardous Waste Management Plan and
intergovernmental agreements and incentives programs being used in
the evaluation of facility proposals?
Documentation:
Comments:
5.
Is your jurisdiction, with the assistance of the County of San Diego,
working with the private sector to provide information, technical
assistance and incentives to achieve the 30 percent waste minimization
goal of the Plan?
70
) <-( ~~ 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Documentation:
Comments:
d)UI;Ilq'i.lmlm~~!1iillf!9_~;~!giI;RiiI~~IIII'iif9i;
j.lm!li..~.~'I'I'Mi;~l'!m.l._~.lq~
.1;m!!!~lm~m!~~~l\lpi!!;I.~I1Bl\.t_fiY"~
.g~;
...'.....-...;.,.;.".,.
__. 'n'________.,.
...-...--....................................
.. ................-w...
saB.entJltion. I'm,)??;'?'.
.......-...,..............................
,.,n ............,......... ......
:.;.;.:.;.:.:.,.:.:,,:.
....,.--"-,.:.'.:'.....'......,..;-.-;...,.::,::,::;::,:::::<::;:,:::,::::::,::::;:;:;:::::;:::::;:::::,:::::,:::;::::::::::::::::::,:;:::::::::::,:::.:.;:::::,:::,:,:.:.:.,.:
..............,.,..............-....
~. ill. p.~m~.!l:M. 9
...--............-..--..............................
...h~~~n~e(}(llazaro()liswaStes are~gti~~~d:4i.spoSed
9tpWPerly?
... t;g~~?Q~#1~t_mi;im~~ii~.g~.~
~9m!!.Y~
71 )1 ~g'f[
Yes}{l)Q~l:ier
HOUSING
~~ttl.~9il~ty
1. Has the Housing Element of your General Plan been updated as Yes No Other
required by State law?
Documentation:
Comments:
2. Has your Housing Element been found to be in substantial compliance Yes No Other
by the State Department of Housing and Community Development?
Documentation:
Comments:
3.
Does your Housing Element include the regional share objective from
the Regional Housing Needs Statement which indicates the number of
new units needed by July, 1996 f9~!m.!!'9miE~iIJg9~~~
~~mmMw!X!19P~~Ptlf~A~!!it~m.W?
Yes No Other
Documentation:
72 JL/ '6;
...
.~
"1
...
.
""'I
J
""'I
;
i
""'I
""'I
,
.,
J
,
...
""'I
..,
,I
""'I
..
"'1
.j
..,
..,
i
j
.,
.,
..,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Comments:
4. Does your Housing Element contain policies to achieve the regional
share objective fi\I!;.I!!ig;;I~!.~I!lI;'..!~~
m~!~~~W~tlimw?
Documentation:
Comments:
· 5,IIit;wl~9HfJ~!tf~\i;i~pl_!9_~I~~~.91J
l~g~J~Y~~~"~~~lllp~!lI~9!.~~..~
~Ym%l!~l~Y#~c
6. Does your Housing Element include the fair share objective from the
Regional Housing Needs Statement which indicates how many new
and existing lower income households should be assisted by July,
1996?
Documentation:
Comments:
73
/ '1 -j {/
Yes No Other
Yes No Other
7. Does your Housing Element contain policies to achieve the fair share Yes No Other
objective?
Documentation:
Comments:
· ~iIBlIII~m~lil!!Il\ll~i!la~~t9I.I~!llI.~l'flaff:l
!?~J5Ylgx.flIII'n9m~I!H!.p~I9j.jIJl~~m~.i
~;.li~I?~~~*~.~;!p~._!8!~~'!I.~~~t!I!l
plP.;mg~pprqy~~qfyiitipiIi'99wR
74
Jt//1/
~i$ ......~.9..............................Othe....................................T......
:.:.,:,..:.:.:.....
..
..
"'!
..
.
..,
,
I
"I
..,
.,
,
j
"'!
"
,
.,
,
I
..
j
.
j
..
,j
...
.
.
l
.,
.i
"'!
.,
.
j
..
,
l
...,
.,
,
.
I
.,
]
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT I
Guidelines for Responding
to the
Regional Growth Management Strategy
Consistency Checklist
SENSITIVE LANDS PRESERVATION AND OPEN SPACE PROTECTION
1.
Have ordinances been adopted which require the consistent treatment of steep slopes,
floodplains, and wetlands as specified in the DefInition of Regionally SignifIcant Open
Space? Please provide documentation for each response.
Steep Slopes
Ordinance should include the following elements:
a. Intent - topography and native vegetation should be preserved
b. DefInition - review development on 25 % or greater slopes; optional threshold --
height of 25 feet and 200 cubic yards excavation
c. Grading, grubbing, and clearing permit required (some exemptions allowed).
Indicate if conflicts with fuel management requirements have been resolved, working
with the fIre department or local fIre district.
d. Zoning - lower density or density transfer to recognize steepness; hillside review --
local agency's guidelines; consider landscape ordinance
Specific Requirements: design guidelines; encroachment limitations; natural
appearance of manufactured slopes following landscaping; open space easement or
similar; penalty for violations .
Consider monitoring and maintenance requirements
Floodplains
a. Has the agency adopted an ordinance requiring conformance with the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulations to protect life and property?
75
/Lj~7.A
~
..,
b. Has the agency adopted other ordinances, including a statement of intent to further
protect the floodplains' environmental values, and ensuring that the following
concerns are addressed: ...,
Does the ordinance require a hydraulics study which limits encroachment into the
floodplain so that:
(1) The 100-year floodflow will not exceed 6 feet per second (considered a non-
erodible velocity, which does not require riprap) at the floodway fringe;
(2) The lO-year low-flow channel will not be reduced; and
(3) Existing riparian growth will be accommodated in the study.
Does the ordinance( s) set forth additional requirements, including:
(1) Concrete or riprap channels will be permitted only to protect existing
buildings;
(2) Floodplain fill should be limited so that the water surface will not increase
along any of the following rivers: San Luis Rey, San Dieguito, San Diego,
Sweetwater, and Otay;
(3) Floodway buffers will be required (San Diego County uses 15% of the
floodway width, with 100 feet maximum); and
(4) Wetlands and other environmental values will be protected.
..,
,
.
-,
.,
....
..,
j
.,
1
j
~
1
11
Has the agency mapped floodplains other than those included on the FEMA maps? ~
Has the agency adopted an ordinance allowing only limited uses in floodplains?
Wetlands
a. Has the agency adopted the wetlands defInition used by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, shown on the National Wetlands Inventory maps, and included in the
DefInition of Regionally SignifIcant Open Space?
Wetlands are lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the
water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water.
For putpOses of this classillcation, wetlands must have one or more of the following
three attributes: (1) at least periodically, the land supports predominantly
hydrophytes; (2) the substrate is predominantly undrained hydric soil; and (3) the
substrate is nonsoil and is saturated at some time during the growing season.
76/I_i}
...
1
~
.,
...
,
..
1
.,
""l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
b. Has the agency adopted an ordinance(s) which addresses the preservation and
protection of wetlands that includes:
(1) A statement of intent that, at a minimum, there should be no net loss of
wetlands acreage or value, and that a net gain is the long-term goal;
(2) The wetlands definition as stated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;
(3) Review requirements for all proposed projects involving wetlands, using the
lOO-year floodplain and the National Wetlands Inventory maps to assist in
their identification;
(4) Grading, grubbing, and clearing requirements as part of the local grading
ordinance, to ensure no destruction of wetlands or wetlands values occurs; and
(5) A requirement for a significant buffer, usually lOO-feet minimum, around each
wetland to protect and maintain the wetland values.
2.
Are actions being taken to acquire lands within your jurisdiction designated in your
General Plan/Community Plans(s) for regional open space parks? Please correct the
information on regional open space parks contained in the Definition if necessary.
a. Has the agency adopted a policy or ordinance to permit public access to major
portions of regional open space parks, while preserving the natural features?
b. Has the agency acquired Bureau of Land Management parcels and improved access
to them and provided trails as required by BLM?
c. Has the agency adopted a policy or ordinance to ensure "urban greenways" within
the community?
d. Have such "greenways" been identified on the general plan or the open space
element map?
3.
Are actions being taken to encourage the preservation of agricultural uses and rural lands?
a. Has the agency adopted an ordinance(s) that establishes an urban boundary beyond
which urban services will not be provided in order to protect rurallagricultural areas?
b. Does the agency encourage establishment and continuation of Williamson Act
contracts?
c. Does the agency indicate "agricultural preserves" on the general plan map?
d. Does the agricultural zoning (if any) permit farm worker housing, packing houses,
and other agricultural activities?
77
/t/-1t/
e. Does the agency encourage agricultural use of reclaimed water -- by pricing policy,
other?
f. Does the agency require a condition notifying buyers of a farm adjacent to a new
subdivision? Or distribute "right to farm" information to adjacent buyers?
g. Does the agency encourage farmers to use all environmentally suitable practices?
h. Are actions being taken to protect rural lands from urban and suburban
encroachment -- rural lands being those lands outside general plan planning areas,
LAFCO spheres, and the County's urban limit line, as well as outside urban utility
service areas (LAFCO), and especially, outside the San Diego County Water
Authority's boundary?
i. Does the agency prohibit industrial land uses and basic economic generators, while
allowing extractive or agriculture-related uses and tourist uses which are dependent
upon and maintain the rural function and character of the land and its rural villages?
j. Does the agency permit only the lowest planned densities associated with rural and
land-extensive agricultural land uses in areas outside rural villages?
k. Does the agency limit commercial development in rural areas to rural villages,
providing for community-serving and tourist-serving and rural area needs?
1. Has the agency identified "rural villages" within its jurisdiction?
78 Ie; ~5~
...
...
""!
~
,
,
j
l
,
,
.,
I
...
j
..,
I
,
..,
""!
""I
.
...
,
""!
-
j
,J
'"'!
...
...
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATIACHMENT 2
List of documents available at SANDAG as resources for the checklist. Most local jurisdictions
are in possession of these documents.
1. 19~~! Regional Trip ReEltletieH OI'dinB:ftee .mc._.;~l!il)~
~mil1~!l![~~~!l
2. Transportation Control Measures [1)gI;gI~!1!!
3. Tmnsit Ltwels sf SeF'tiee ~~~tftl.'''I~alipil'.~~.~
~Qyemb~rl~O\
M~,:...;,;.:.;.:.:.:,:.:,:-:.:.:.:.;.:.:...:.:._.:.:.:,:...:.:.:.:.:-:,;.:.1
4. :l~~~ Regional Transportation Plan mlinllt~~Il)
5. .~~,~.~. Congestion Management Program m;1IP'liE!~~~.)
6. CBtlaty Water Atltherity OI'diHMee 91 2
6. Dfllft sf CBtlffiy Water fdltllerity Wllter CSHSef'VatisH Me DemMa MMagemeat PregflHR
1.9.\I!!Wi!Rg~I':lm~~_R~g!IIlI'~~I~~ii~q~~m~~lt~!i~
1~~3~m~~~F~~
7. County Water Authority's Model Water Reclamation Ordinance
8. State Department of Water Resources Model Xeriscape Ordinance
9. DefInition of Regionally SignifIcant Open Space
10. San Diego County Hazardous Waste Management Plan
11. Southern California Hazardous Waste Management Plan
12. Regional Housing Needs Statement
79
/ 1 /(3 ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX 2
SELF-CERTIFICATION PROCESS AND SCHEDULE
REGIONAL GROW1H MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
INTRODUCTION
The SANDAG Joint Powers Agreement Amendment that established the Regional Planning and
Growth Management Review Board requires the Board to adopt rules to implement a self-
certification process for member agencies. Member agencies agree to "... determine (self-
certify) the pertinent elements of their general plans with regional plans." The attached three-
part outline and schedule is intended to carry out the self-certification process.
The following three points should be incoIpOrated in self-certification:
. The parts of the Regional Growth Management Strategy (RGMS) subject to consistency
determination should include more than plans and policies. Important implementation
actions recommended in the RGMS, such as ordinances, should also be included in local
determination of consistency. The RGMS will identify recommendations that should be
included in self-certification.
. Local jurisdictions should have flexibility in determining their consistency with the RGMS.
If a jurisdiction has not adopted the exact policy or implementation action identified in the
RGMS, it should be able to certify its consistency if it can document an alternative means
it is using to achieve the objectives of the RGMS recommendations.
. There should be consistency between the RGMS and the plans and programs of appropriate
single purpose regional agencies. The single pUIpOse regional agencies including the Air
Pollution Control District, County Water Authority, Regional Water Quality Control Board
and San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission have been involved in the
preparation of the Strategy, and their plans, or elements of their plans, have been included
as part of the Strategy. To ensure consistency the agencies will:
1) Review the draft Strategy for consistency with their plans and programs, and suggest
changes to the Strategy as appropriate. Plans and programs may also be revised to
achieve consistency;
2) Review the adopted Strategy annually for consistency with their plans and programs,
and report in a similar manner as local jurisdictions to the Regional Board on the
results of that review; and
3) Participate in the annual Quality of Life Standards and Objectives monitoring report.
81
/'/-;/
This participation, in conjunction with local jurisdiction self-certification with the Regional
Growth Management Strategy, will provide for comprehensive local/regional cooperation.
In the event of a dispute, single pUIpOse regional agencies may request that SANDAG
initiate the Conflict Resolution Procedure available to member agencies.
PART I: INITIAL SELF-CERTIFICATION PROCESS
1. Regional Board adopts initial RGMS after holding a public
hearing.
2. Regional Board prepares and distributes model self-certification
resolution and checklist as guidance to local jurisdictions.
The checklist will be modeled after the CEQA initial study
checklist. The checklist will identify RGMS recommendations
requiring self-certification. Each jurisdiction will be asked to
check one of three responses (full consistency, partial consistency,
or inconsistent) for the identified RGMS recommendations. Space
will be provided to explain the response for each recommendation,
including documentation of how consistency may have been
achieved through alternative actions to those recommended in the
RGMS. This feature of the checklist will provide for local
flexibility in self-certification.
3. Local jurisdictions fIle status report with the Regional Board
(the completed checklist) regarding consistency with the
RGMS after holding a public hearing.
The status report should identify where the jurisdiction is consis-
tent, and identify actions the jurisdiction intends to take to achieve
consistency. If a jurisdiction anticipates that the actions necessary
to achieve consistency will take more than twelve months it will
notify the Board in the status report and provide an estimated
completion date.
4. Local jurisdictions take actions to achieve consistency.
SUMMER, 1991
1ST MONTH
FOLLOWING
ADOPTION
BY END OF
6TII MONTH
FOLLOWING
ADOPTION
6TII MONTH
TIIROUGH 18TII
MONTH FOLLOWING
ADOPTION
5. Local jurisdictions adopt self-certification resolution and fIle
with Regional Board after holding a public hearing. A revised
checklist is attached to resolution.
82
J(/~~ Y
BY END OF
19TII MONTH
FOLLOWING
ADOPTION
""!
..
...
1
"'!
,
1
""l
"'!
A
..,
..,
...,
1
""l
...
.,
.
..
'J
J
.,
.,
;i
...
.
j
,
..,
i
,
.,
..,
1
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.
Regional Board issues status report on self-certification at a public
hearing. The status report is a compilation of local jurisdiction
self-certification documentation provided in step 5.
BY END OF
20th MONTI!
FOLLOWING
ADOPTION
PART IT: CONTINUING SELF-CERTIFICATION PROCESS
1. After adoption of the initial RGMS by the Regional Board, all CONTINUING
RGMS related local jurisdiction plan amendments, regulations and
other actions should be subject to a self-certification fmding. A
copy of each fmding should be forwarded to the Regional Board,
placed on their agenda as an information item, and made available
to the public.
2. Regional Board prepares and distributes annual report monitoring EACH MARCH
growth and the implementation of the RGMS.
This report is the regional "report card" on progress toward
meeting the Quality of Life Standards and Objectives in the
ROMS. It highlights any changes that may be necessary in the
ROMS to account for changes in Quality of Life Standards and
Objectives or for problems encountered in making progress
towards their achievement. . The annual monitoring report should
be issued to the Regional Board at a public hearing.
3. Regional Board adopts any appropriate changes or additions to EACH JUNE
the ROMS, based on local jurisdiction/regional agency review and
comment on the monitoring report and after holding a public
hearing.
4. Regional Board prepares and distributes model self-certification EACH JULY
resolution and checklist as guidance to local jurisdictions.
The checklist will have the same format as the checklist developed
for the initial self-certification process. However, it will only
concern changes and additions to the ROMS adopted the previous
month.
5. Local jurisdictions adopt self-certification resolution and fIle EACH JANUARY
with Regional Board after holding a public hearing. The checklist
is attached to resolution.
83
/L/-9/
If the jurisdiction is unable to complete the actions necessary to
achieve consistency by January, it will notify the Board of the date
when it expects to fIle its consistency resolution.
6. Regional Board issues status report on self-certification at a EACH FEBRUARY
public hearing. The status report is a compilation of local
jurisdiction self-certification documentation provided in Steps I and
5.
PART ill: SELF-CERTIFICATION DISPUTES AMONG MEMBER
AGENCIES - CONFUCT RESOLUTION PROCEDURE
The SANDAG Joint Powers Agreement Amendment establishing the Regional Board includes
provisions for resolving self-certification disputes:
Upon request l7y a Member Agency, the Regional Board will review these
self-certifications, and make findings regarding consistency. Where
determined by the Regional Board to be appropriate, the Regional Board
shall use SANDAG's Conflict Resolution Procedurefor resolving disputes
among Member Agencies.
The SANDAG Conflict Resolution Procedure follows:
1. Education
.,
....
...
1
"'\
.,
\\
j
...
:1
.
.,
.,
""'!
.,
1
j
""'!
In order to provide member agencies with a working knowledge of dispute resolution
options, to provide information on the methods and techniques for resolving disputes that
require neutral intervention, and to reduce the frequency of unresolved disputes between ,.
local agencies, SANDAG shall provide an education program to Board members and staff .
in conflict management techniques.
2. Agreement to Participate
Local govermnent agencies involved in an inteljurisdictional conflict which cannot be
resolved among the agencies may, through formal action of their policy bodies, agree to
participate in resolving the dispute in accordance with this procedure. Evidence of the
agreement to participate shall be forwarded by the local agencies to SANDAG, and shall
describe the issue(s) for which review is requested. SANDAG's role shall be limited to
providing assistance to the agencies in accordance with this procedure.
Participation in the conflict resolution process shall be voluntary, but is strongly
encouraged prior to initiation of litigation by an agency. All parties involved in the
dispute shall be requested to participate.
84
jL(~!OO
...
I
...
I
...
I
....
I
1
,
....
j
j
...
l
I
j
"'l
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.
Implementation
The Conflict Resolution Procedure may be initiated by:
. one or more involved local agencies
. the SANDAG Board of Directors
. the SANDAG Executive Committee (where timing requires)
4.
Confidentiality
The process set forth in Section 5, below, shall be subject to the provisions of California
law relating to confidentiality, and specifically the provisions of Section 1152.5 of the
Evidence Code.
5.
Process
a. SANDAG staff meets with the affected agencies for pUIpOses of interviewing them
regarding the nature and scope of the conflict and to request all necessary
information. Such interviews shall be undertaken as soon as possible, but in no case
later than 30 days from the date of agreement by the agencies to participate.
b. SANDAG staff facilitates the selection of a neutral third-party to recommend an
appropriate facilitation and negotiation model to be used in resolving the dispute
which may include, but not be limited to:
. Mediation
. Arbitration
c. SANDAG staff serving, where appropriate, as a resource to the agencies, and a
neutral third-party convene the conflict resolution conference using the model agreed
to by the agencies.
The conference should generally consist of the following elements:
Stage I.
Introduction
Stage n.
Opening statement by the agencies
Stage m.
Exchange (for pUIpOses of developing an understanding of
each agency's issues and positions)
Stage IV.
Development of options
Stage V.
Draft and execute agreement
85
/tJ~/()/
d. The agreement is implemented by the agencies. Follow-up of implementation of the
agreement is done by SANDAG.
e.
The Executive Director shall report to the Board at regular intervals on the use of
the procedure by local agencies.
86
) t-J - / OJ-
"'"
...
...
""I
""'I
'"'
""I
\
;
'""I
...
,
1
1
...
)
...
...
,
..,
}
,
.
.,
I
j
.,
i
.
""'I
...
...
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX 3
PROPOsmON C
REGIONAL PLANNING AND GROWTII CONTROL MEASURE
Section A. Statement of PuIpOse and Intent
The purpose of this measure is to demonstrate public support for the concept that certain
impacts associated with growth should be resolved on a regional basis. This Measure
proposes the establishment of a Regional Planning and Growth Management Review Board
(the "Regional Board") which will formulate a regional growth management plan for
resolving problems associated with transportation management, solid waste disposal, water
reclamation, sewage disposal, air quality and growth inducing industrial zoning. Each city
within the San Diego region (the "cities") and the County of San Diego (the "County")
shall participate in the formulation of, and shall comply with, the adopted regional growth
management plan. This Measure contains the following components:
Section B. Rel!ional Planning and Growth Management Review Board
The Regional Board shall be established by the County and the cities to prepare a regional
growth management plan which addresses transportation management, solid waste disposal,
water reclamation, sewage disposal, air quality, and determines a fair allocation of
industrial land use for each jurisdiction. The Regional Board shall have the authority to
require that the County and the cities adopt the necessary legislation to implement the
regional growth management plan.
In addition to its authority to formulate and enforce a regional growth management plan,
the Regional Board shall be an advisory agency empowered to inform the cities and the
County of any regional impacts that might result from any proposed legislative action and
to propose revisions to a particular project or proposal or to recommend mitigation
measures. The Regional Board may also present proposals to the cities and County, and
87
/ '-j- J!J }
""!
...
encourage the inclusion of such proposals in their respective General Plans, in order to
resolve regional problems associated with traffic circulation patterns, land use allocations
(with particular emphasis on job-generating land uses), timing and phasing of development,
resource protection, community character, and any other regional land use issues. Such
proposals may be advisory in nature and will become enforceable only upon adoption of
the proposals by the cities and the County.
1
.,
""'!
The Regional Board shall be comprised of at least' one representative of each city and of
the County who is an elected official. A Blue Ribbon Committee shall be established,
consisting of representatives from the cities and the County, to determine how the Regional
Board should be established, the form of State legislation required, and whether a joint
powers agreement would be necessary between the cities and the County. This Blue
Ribbon Committee shall formulate its recommendation by no later than June 30, 1989.
.,
1
..,
i
..,
Section C. Re~onal Growth Manal!ement Plan
.,
The regional growth management plan shall establish guidelines for certain regional growth
issues and formulate legislation for the cities and the County to implement. The plan shall
contain the following elements:
""!
,
I
-"
1. Ouality of Life Standards: To be adopted for the region as a whole and for the cities
and County. The quality of life standards shall be limited to transportation
management, solid waste disposal, water reclamation, sewage disposal, and air
quality.
..
""!
i
A
..,
2. Regional Facilities: To identify needed regional facilities necessary for attainment
of the quality of life standards, the cost of such facilities, and possible fmancing
mechanisms.
""!
,
""!
i
j
,
88
Jilt/1
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3. Holdine Canacities: To be established for the region as a whole and for the cities
and County, to be based on facilities adequacy and the ability to attain and maintain
the quality of life standards.
4. Transportation System Management: To contain mandatory regional techniques such
as ride sharing, flexible work hours, and to promote public transportation services
along major corridors.
5. Growth Rate Comnonent: To identify and address those causes of growth which are
subject to local or regional control, with the objective of assuring attainment of the
quality of life standards by, if necessary, reducing overall growth within the region.
6. Growth Phasin2 Component: To tie the rate of development to the provision of
adequate regional facilities as needed to attain the quality of life standards.
7. Regional Land Use Distribution Component: To develop regional policies
concerning the allocation of industrial land use to promote a better balance between
employment and residential land uses, with the objectivity of reducing traffic
congestion, air pollution and energy usage.
The regional growth management plan shall be prepared and adopted by the Regional
Board within one year of the formal establishment of the Regional Board. The cities and
County shall amend all appropriate elements of their General Plans to include the
previously mentioned seven elements within one year following adoption of the regional
growth management plan to conform to its provisions.
Section D. Interim Development Constraints
Interim constraints to limit growth to 75 % of the San Diego Association of Governments
population projections for each city, community or subregional area may be placed on all
development activity within the region until the Regional Growth Management Plan has
89
/L/~/t?>'
...
...
been prepared and adopted by the Regional Planning and Growth Management Review
Board, and implemented by the region's jurisdictions.
.,
,
Section E. Regional Fundinl! System
""!
An equitable funding system shall be established for planning and implementation of these
growth management strategies.
""!
:it
..,
~
.,
""!
...
l
...
t
..,
...
...
..,
~
j
J
.,
..,
...
i
90
jL-/- -I (/ 6
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX 4
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
SUBJECT: Regional Growth Management Strategy
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: See attached Initial Study
n. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The San Diego County region (San Diego County).
m. DETERMINATION:
The San Diego Association of Governments has conducted an Initial Study and
determined that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the
environment, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required.
IV. DOCUMENTATION:
The attached Initial Study documents the reasons to support the above determination.
V. MITIGATION MEASURES:
Any projects that will result from the implementation of the Regional Growth
Management Strategy will be subject to environmental review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act.
VI. PUBUC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION:
Draft copies or notice of this Negative Declaration were distributed to the attached
list of agencies and groups.
vn. RESULTS OF PUBUC REVIEW:
To be added at the close of the review period.
Copies of the Draft Negative Declaration and any Initial Study material are available at
the SANDAG offices, at the above address, for review, or for purchase for the cost of
reproduction.
~ \J~ S?#
Stuart R. Shaffer
Deputy Executive Director
July 12. 1991
Date of Draft Report
ANALYST: Susan Baldwin
91
/tJ~/~7
MIl
""'I
INITIAL STUDY
SUBJECT: Regional Growth Management Strategy
""'I
I. PURPOSE AND MAIN FEATURES:
""t
In November, 1988, the voters of the San Diego region approved Proposition C
which called for the establishment of a Regional Planning and Growth Management
Review Board, and the preparation of a Regional Growth Management Strategy.
SANDAG's Board of Directors now serves as the Regional Planning and Growth
Management Review Board.
""t
,
The Regional Growth Management Strategy contains policies and recommended
actions to manage the adverse impacts of growth in the San Diego region. The
Strategy takes a quality of life approach to managing growth. The actions contained
in the Strategy are intended to preserve or improve the region's quality of life.
...,
f
""t
Eight Quality of Life Factors have been included in the Strategy: air quality, water,
sewage treatment, sensitive lands preservation and open space protection, solid waste
management, hazardous waste management, transportation system and demand
management, and housing. These factors were chosen because they address issues
that affect the whole San Diego region, not just individual jurisdictions.
""'l
"'!
Standards and objectives have been assigned to each Quality of Life factor. These
standards and objectives are the goals of the Strategy. They are measurable so that
we can monitor how well we are doing in meeting them each year, and their
achievement will be the primary measure of the Strategy's success.
""I
""
The Strategy contains recommended actions to achieve the Quality of Life Standards
and Objectives. The plans and programs of several regional public agencies such as
the Air Pollution Control District and the County Water Authority are included in the
recommended actions.
,
.,
In addition, the Strategy contains recommendations in two areas which relate to the
achievement of the Quality of Life Standards and Objectives: (1) Regional Public
Facilities Financing and Siting, and (2) Growth Rate, Phasing and Land Use
Distribution. How we will pay for such things as transportation facilities and open
space will be included in a Regional Public Facilities Financing Plan to be distributed
at a later date. How we will site facilities like new landfills, and whether we should
try and balance jobs and housing to reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality,
are discussed in the Strategy.
""
:i
,
..,
j
.,
I
i
The Strategy also describes how we will monitor our progress in meeting the Quality
of Life Standards and Objectives, and how local jurisdictions and regional agencies
will certify the consistency of their plans, policies and regulations with the Strategy.
""'l
""'I
92
/L/-/tl[{
""'l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING:
The San Diego County region (San Diego County).
m. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
The Initial Study Checklist is attached. The Checklist is designed to identify the
potential for significant environmental impacts which could be associated with a
project. Answers of "yes" and "maybe" indicate that there is a potential for
significant environmental impacts, and these answers are discussed in Section IV.
IV. DISCUSSION:
The main purpose of the Regional Growth Management Strategy is to mitigate the
adverse environmental impacts of growth in the San Diego region. The
recommended actions in the Strategy will have, overall, a positive effect on the
environment. While implementation of some of the recommended actions may have
a significant effect on the environment, e.g. the construction of transportation, solid
waste and other public facilities, these projects will be subject to environmental
review at the project level before they are built.
"Yes" and "maybe" answers in the Initial Study Checklist indicate a potential for
significant environmental impacts. These determinations are explained below.
G. 1, 2 and 3. Land Use - The Strategy makes recommendations regarding the
protection of sensitive lands such as steep slopes, wetlands and floodplains. These
recommendations may result in changes to land use designations, or the goals,
objectives and recommendations contained in local land use plans. They may also
be inconsistent with the adopted environmental plans for an area. Implementing the
Strategy's recommendations in this case would, however, result in improvements to
local plans and policies with respect to environmental issues.
J. Population - The Strategy could alter the planned location, distribution, density or
growth rate of the population in the region. There are several recommendations
included in the Strategy, or which may be included, which may result in changes of
this type.
The sensitive lands and open space recommendations may cause population related
changes as a result of changes to local plans and policies. These changes to local
plans and policies would result from the protection of sensitive environmental
resources, and would require environmental review at the time they are proposed.
There are several potential recommendations which may be included in the Strategy
as it evolves which may also result in population related changes. These include
potential recommendations to balance the location of jobs and housing, and increasing
densities adjacent to transit stations and other access points to the transportation
93
/y-;OCj
...
...
system. Although the Strategy does not include recommendations regarding these
issues now, they are still being studied and recommendations may be added in the
future. If changes like this are proposed they could affect the Land Use category
(G.), too. The major purpose of these potential changes would be to reduce traffic
congestion and improve air quality, thus improving the enviromnent. Specific
enviromnental impacts relating to these potential land use and population changes
would, however, be considered dunng the enviromnental review of specific projects.
'"'!
""t
M. Public Services - The Strategy could have an effect upon, or result in a need for
new or altered govermnental services for fire protection, police protection, schools,
parks or other recreational facilities, main~nance of public facilities, or other
govermnental services. These changes could result from the potential land use or
population effects discussed in G. and J. above. No specific changes are
recommended in the Strategy, however, and any changes would require
enviromnental review, when and if specific projects are proposed.
""
""I
...
...,
;
.,
.,
.,
1
i
.,
.
""
'1
.,
1
...
,
..,
1
,
.,
"'"
:~
94
JY-//(}
.,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Initial Study Checklist
m. Environmental Analysis:
This Initial Study checklist is designed to identify the potential for significant
environmental impacts which could be associated with a project. All answers of
"yes" and "maybe" indicate that there is a potential for significant environmental
impacts and these determinations are explained in Section IV.
Yes Maybe H!
A. GeoIOl~y/Soils. Will the proposal result in:
1. Exposure of people or property to
geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mudslides, ground failure,
or similar hazards?
..lL
2. Any increase in wind or water erosion
of soils, either on or off the site?
..lL
B. Air Will the proposal result in:
-'
1. Air emissions which would substantially
deteriorate ambient air quality?
2. The exposure of sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations?
3. The creation of objectionable odors?
4. The creation of dust?
5. Any alteration of air movement in
the area of the project?
6. A substantial alteration in moisture,
or temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
C. Hydroloity/Water Ouality. Will the proposal
result in:
..lL
..lL
..lL
..lL
..lL
..lL
95
)~ -/ / /
....
""'!
l. Changes in currents, or the course of
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters? -1L ..,
2. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of ...
:i
surface runoff? -1L
3. Alterations to the course or flow of ...,
flood waters? -1L i
4. Discharge into surface or ground waters, ..,
or in any alteration of surface or ground
water quality, including, but not limited ""I
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity? _-1L ,
5. Discharge into surface or ground waters, ""I
significant amounts of pesticides, herbicides, .
fertilizers, gas, oil or other noxious ...
chemicals? _-1L ,
,
6. Change in deposition or erosion of beach ....
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition "
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean ..,
or any bay, inlet or lake? _-1L
7. Exposure of people or property to water ""I
,
related hazards such as flooding? _-1L !
,
8. Change in the amount of surface water '"!
,
in any water body? _-1L
D. Biology. Will the proposal result in: ..,
l. A reduction in the number of any unique,
rare, endangered, sensitive or fully ~
protected species of plants or animals? _-1L
2. A substantial change in the diversity ....
;,
of any species of animals or plants? _-1L
3. Introduction of invasive species of .,
plants into the area? _-1L
..,
96 / 1-/ - / I J-
...
j
I
I 4. Interference with the movement of any
I resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species? ---X-
I 5. An impact on a sensitive habitat,
including, but not limited to streamside
vegetation, oak woodland, vernal pools,
I coastal salt marsh, lagoon, wetland, or
coastal sage scrub or chaparral? X
--
I 6. Deterioration of existing fish or
wildlife habitat? X
--
I E. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
1. A significant increase in the
I existing ambient noise levels? - _ ---X-
2. Exposure of people to noise levels
I which exceed the City's adopted
noise ordinance? X
--
I 3. Exposure of people to current or future
transportation noise levels which exceed
I standards established in the Transportation
Element of the General Plan? _ ---X-
F. Li~ht. Glare and Shadin!!. Will the proposal
I result in:
I 1. Substantial light or glare? _ ---X-
2. Substantial shading of other properties? _ ---X-
I G. Land Use. Will the proposal result in:
I 1. A land use which is inconsistent with
the adopted community plan land use
designation for the site? ---X-
I 2. A conflict with the goals, objectives
and recommendations of the community
I plan in which it is located? ---X-
3. A conflict with adopted environmental
I plans for the area? ---X-
I 97 IY-/ I}
.,
~
4.
land uses which are not compatible with
aircraft accident potential as dermed by
a SANDAG (ALUC) Airport land Use Plan?_
-1L
.,
H. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
I.
J.
K.
.,
1.
The prevention of future extraction of
sand and gravel resources?
...
-1L
2. The conversion of agricultural land to
nonagricultural use or impairment of the
agricultural productivity of agricultural
land?
.,
_ _-1L
Recreational Resources: Will the proposal
result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
""I
"'"
-1L
.
.
Population. Will the proposal alter the
planned location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the population of an area?
""I
~
-1L
Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing in the community, or create a demand
for additional housing?
..,
1
i
-1L
"1
L. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal
result in:
~
1
1.
Traffic generation in excess of specific/
community plan allocation?
-1L
'1
,j
,
2. An increase in projected traffic which is
substantial in relation to the capacity of
the street system?
-1L
,
l
3. An increased demand for off-site parking?
..,
1
j
-1L
4.
Effects on existing parking?
-1L
..,
\
5.
Substantial impact upon existing or
planned transportation systems?
.,
I
-1L
6.
Alterations to present circulation move-
ments including effects on existing public
.,
98
Fj-Ili
..,
i
~
I
I access to beaches, parks, or other open
I space areas? - - J.....
7. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
I vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? - - J.....
M. Public Services. Will the proposal have an
I effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered governmental services in any of the
following areas:
I a. Fire protection? - J..... -
I b. Police protection? J..... -
c. Schools? J.....
-
I d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? - J..... _
I e. Maintenance of public
facilities, including roads? J..... -
I
f. Other governmental services? J.....
I N. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a
need for new systems, or require substantial
I alterations to existing utilities, including:
a. Power? J.....
I b. Natural gas? J.....
I c. Communications systems? J.....
d. Water? J.....
I e. Sewer? J.....
I f. Storm water drainage? -1L
g. Solid waste disposal? -1L
I o. Ener~y . Will the proposal result in the use
of excessive amounts of fuel or energy? - - -1L
I
I 99 It! /' Il~
""I
..,
f
P. Water Conservation. Will the proposal result in: j
1. Use of excessive amounts of water? -X- .,
- -
2. Landscaping which is predominantly ....
non-drought resistant vegetation? -X- j
- - !
,
Q. Nei~hborhood Character! Aesthetics. Will the .,
proposal result in:
1. The obstruction of any vista or scenic ....
view from a public viewing area? -X- i
- - ,
2. The creation of a negative aesthetic "'I
site or project? - - -X-
3. Project bulk, scale, materials or style ..,
which will be incompatible with surrounding
development? - - -X-
"'t
4. Substantial alteration to the existing i
character of the area? - - -X-
~
Ii
5. The loss of any distinctive or landmark ,
I
tree(s), or a stand of mature trees? - - -X-
"'!
6. Substantial change in topography or ground .
.
surface relief features? - - -X-
""
7. The loss, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features such ~~
as a natural canyon, sandstone bluff, rock
outcrop or hillside with a slope in excess
of 25 percent? - - -X- -
R. Cultural/Scientific Resources. Will the
proposal result in: ...
,
1. Alteration of or the destruction of a j
prehistoric or historic archaeological .,
site? - - -X-
2. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a "'of
prehistoric or historic building, structure,
object or site? - - -X-
.,
100
)t-/-II? .,
.~
j
~"---~
I
I
3. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to an
architecturally significant building,
structure, or object?
4. Any impact to existing religious or
sacred uses within the potential
impact area?
5. The loss of paleontological resources?
S. Human Health/Public Safety. Will the
proposal result in:
X
X
X
X
X
1.
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
r2.
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
3.
A future risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous substances
(including but not limited to gas,
oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation
or explosives)?
1
Findings Significance.
T. Mandatory
of
1.
Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self -
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
2.
Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage
of long -term, environmental goals? (A
short-term impact on the environment is
one which occurs in a relatively brief,
lol
X
X
X
X
X
""l
~
..,
,
definitive period of time while long- ,
tenn impacts will endure well into the ...
future.)
J
- - --1L '"t
3. Does the project have impacts which are \
individually limited, but cumulatively ,
considerable? (A project may impact .,
on two or more separate resources
where the impact on each resource is
relatively small, but where the effect of .,
the total of those impacts on the \
environment is significant.)
- - --1L ""l
4. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial ..,
adverse effects on human beings, either J
J
directly or indirectly?
--1L ...
- -
~
...
'5
"'"
,
..,
...
i
....,
""l
-
...
:~
i
,
102
Ji -j) i
~
1
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DISTRIBUTION
REGIONAL GROWTII MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
Negative Declaration
Draft copies or notice of this Negative Declaration were given a broad distribution. The
following agencies, groups and individuals from SANDAG's mailing list were sent copies
of the Draft Regional Growth Management Strategy and Negative Declaration:
Incorporated Cities (San Diego Region) - Mayors, Councilmembers, Planning
Commissioners, City Managers, Planning Directors, Public Works/Utilities Directors
County of San Diego - Board of Supervisors, Chief Administrative Officer, Planning
Commissioners, Planning Director, Public Works Director
City of San Diego Community Planning Groups
County of San Diego Community Planning and Sponsor Groups
State Legislators, San Diego Delegation
Department of Defense
CALTRANS
State Clearinghouse
Air Pollution Control District
Local Agency Formation Commission
Metropolitan Transit Development Board
North County Transit Development Board
Board of Port Commissioners
Regional Water Quality Control Board
County Water Authority
Water District Managers
Sewer District Managers
California Transportation Commission
California Council of Government Directors
League of Women Voters, Officers and Directors
Environmental Groups - Sierra Club, Citizens Coordinate for Century 3, Environmental
Health Coalition, San Diego Ecology Centre, I Love a Clean San Diego, et al.
Chambers of Commerce (San Diego Region)
SANDAG Committees -
Regional Growth Management Technical Committee
Regional Transportation Advisory Committee (RTAC)
Regional Transportation Demand Management Advisory Committee
Regional Transportation Demand Management Technical Committee
Shoreline Erosion Committee
Regional Revenues Advisory Committee
Open Space Technical Advisory Committee and Public Participation List
Integrated Waste Management Citizens and Technical Committees
Copies were also sent to:
Serra Reference Library
Governmental Reference Library
University Libraries
103 / I' ~ / / /
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 1..5
Meeting Date 5/5/92
ITEM TITLE: Report: Council action upholding Planning Commission decision on
freestanding sign at 830 Broadway - Pacific Sign Construction Company
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning eo)
REVIEWED BY: City Manager tf (4/Sths Vote: Yes_NoX)
On April 28, 1992, City Council held a scheduled public hearing to consider an appeal on a
freestanding sign located at 830 Broadway. By 4-0-1 vote, the Council took action to uphold
the Planning Commission's decision and denied the applicant's appeal. In reviewing the records
the following day, it was determined that the owners of the property; Le., the Firestone
Company, received notification of the hearing; however, Pacific Sign Construction, who was
representing the appellant in this case, failed to receive notice of the public hearing, due to an
administrative error. Therefore, under the advice of the City Attorney's office, we request that
you rescind your previous action and set a new public hearing on June 2. The applicant concurs
with this request.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council rescind action on DRC-92-04 and reschedule a public
hearing for June 2, 1992, at 4:00 p.m. to consider the appeal.g
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
(F_.A1l3)
\C; -\
ITEM 16
DATE 5/5/92
16. PUBLIC HEARING
PCM-92-03: REQUEST TO AMEND THE EASTLAKE
II GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, EASTLAKE
GREENS SPA PLAN AND EASTLAKE I
(EXPANSION) PLANNED DISTRICT REGULATIONS
staff requests that the public hearing be continued to the meeting
of May 19,1992.
if,;, -1
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Ita , I
Meeting Date 5/5/92
ITEM TITLE: Public hearing to consider the vacation of two public service
sewer easements at 1144 Broadway
Resolution \I.D"'\~ Ordering the vacation of two public
service sewer easements at 1144 Broadway
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Work~~
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-x-)
At its meeting held on April 21, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution
16587 stating the Council's intent to vacate two publ i c sewer easements at
1144 Broadway. In accordance with Section 8320 of the Streets and Highways
Code, the resolution also set May 5, 1992, at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time
for the public hearing for the Council to consider this matter.
RECOIfIIENDATION: That the Council hold the publ ic hearing, adopt the subject
resol ut ion orderi ng the vacation of the subject publ i c sewer easements and
direct the City Clerk to record said resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOIfIIENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
A building addition to the Price Club retail warehouse at 1144 Broadway was
done in 1987. As a result, a relocation of the sewer was needed. A new sewer
line was installed and the old line is no longer required. The Price Company
recently requested that the City vacate the old sewer easement.
That sewer line within Easement "A" has been relocated as shown in Exhibit B
and, therefore, the City sewer easement is no longer needed. This new 1 ine
provides a connection to the City sewer system for the most southerly building
on Parcel 2.
In addition, the sewer line in Easement "B" is serving the building on Parcel
1 and the most southerly building on Parcel 2. A City sewer easement is not
needed for this sewer 1 ine because it serves private businesses and the
property owners have a reciprocal easement agreement to provide for this
facility. This easement agreement was executed between the Price Company and
PKS CHULA VISTA ASSOCIATES (owners of parcel 2) and is shown on the title
report as recorded on May 16, 1988 as File No. 88-212477 of Official Records.
To be consistent, the City asked the Price Company if they would oppose
vacat i on of thi s easement. The Pri ce Company has no probl em vacat i ng the
public sewer easement so that all sewers within the parcels will be privately
maintained.
FISCAL IMPACT: A minor and unmeasureable fiscal impact will occur in that
the City will no longer have to maintain the sewer mains.
RH: fp/PV-050
WPC 5978E
\1-1
RESOLUTION NO. Ibb\ 3
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ORDERING THE VACATION OF TWO
PUBLIC SERVICE SEWER EASEMENTS AT 1144
BROADWAY
The City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHER~S, the Price Company, owner of the property at 1144
Broadway, has requested that the City vacate the old sewer easement
which is no longer required since the installation of a new sewer
line; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting held on April 21, 1992, Council
adopted Resolution 16587 stating the Council's intent to vacate two
public sewer easements at 1144 Broadway; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with S8320 of the Streets and
Highways Code, the resolution also set May 5, 1992, at 6:00 p.m. as
the date and time for the public hearing for the Council to
consider this matter; and
WHEREAS, notices required by Streets and Highways Code
S8323 have been posted; and
WHEREAS, Tuesday, the 5th day of May, 1992 at 6:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers of the City of Chula vista was fixed as the
time and place for hearing any objections to such vacation, and the
Council having heard all interested persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby order the vacation of two
public service sewer easements more particularly described in
Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference
as if set forth in full.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city Clerk is hereby
directed to record a certified copy of this resolution with the
office of the San Diego County Recorder.
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
Presented by
C:\rs\vacatioo
\-"l -1
THE PRICE COMPANY
PRICE CLUBe . P.O. BOX 85466 . SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92186.5466 · (619) 581.4600
Mr. Rick Hernandez
Chula vista Engineering Division
Department of Public Works
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91910
l~ ::;
.. c. ,.
::tt -Z.." f"l
'tiIj ~\,..,n
, ... f"l
~ '1!.''''C""
- - ~
;t, r I"
z. (,).,. a
- (;)"
c,p % VI
-\...
=:a .,.
February 18, 1992
RE: PRICE CLUB SEWER EASEMENT VACATION
In response to a letter dated Feb. 10, 1992, concerning the private
vs. public status of sewer easements on the Chula Vista Price Club
site, we are providing the following input. The Price Company has
no problem with vacating the public sewer easements on the
property. The sewer lines would then become private lines and are
covered by an existing reciprocal easement agreement between the
Price Club and the shopping center parcel providing a general grant
of easements across all parcels to utility lines.
We would appreciate having the matter resolved so that the title to
the property can be cleaned up.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
sincerely,
THE PRICE COMPANY
K~~
Kathy Nishihira
Director of Planning, West Coast
cc: Graham Baxter; J.B. Young Assoc.
Tom Galvin, The Price Company
,.,... ~
C\.I
...J
l.LI
U
a::
~
III >-
~ ~
c:::o c;:,
:::! 't
~ ~
III
Cl
...
...: -
CI) -
...
~
~~
"
,./
\,-tot
IL
^~Ma~OH8
f
I-
Z
'"
~
"'-
<n'
...al
"'~
a:Z
",,,,
~~
",,,,
",,,,
..
. '"
2_
I ___ __ _.:: -__nn
_L Mlf___
----_.----:-:.::~- --
...J
l.LI
U
a::
<t
11.
>-
g;~
"c;:,
"'t
Cl
l,,%
"
-...
[t~
-
I-
Z
'"
~
"'-
""
"."
",.
I-
a:z
"''''
~~
"''''
"''''
. ..
o~
I ____
K';::--=_-_-=
I/t-r
'"
'"
'"
/,;,
'"
----:= ;;-===:_-::!:.:,'
----
===-
--
--
~
~<(
<:
Cl
-
'-
e
't
I-
Z
'"
"'~
Oz'"
~~~
.. '"
<.>a: ~
g~o
"'",a:
a:."...
\
S~.8
L9~
,
'"
N
I-
l.LI
l.LI
a::
I-
Cf)
o
a::
o
u...
x
o
'"
CD
'N
?-
m
-
:c
x
~
11'
/
EXHIBIT A
Sewer Easements within Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 120S3, in the City of Chula
Vista, County of San Diego, State of Cal Hornia, according to map thereof
filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, more
particularly described as follows:
SEWER EASEMENT "A"
BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY AND
OXFORD STREET: THENCE S71'3S'SI"W S03.40 FEET; THENCE
NlS'21'09"W 36.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S71'3S'51"W 10.00 FEET; THENCE NlS'21'09"W S7.73
FEET; THENCE NS4'39'53"W SO.90 FEET; THENCE NlS'21'09"W
244.77 FEET; THENCE N71'3S'51"E 10.00 FEET; THENCE
SIS'21'09"E 23S.23 FEET; THENCE SS4'39'53"E SO.9 FEET;
THENCE SIS'21'09"E 94.27 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SEWER EASEMENT "B"
BEGINNING A THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY AND
OXFORD STREET; THENCE S71'3S'SI"W 42S.70 FEET; THENCE
NlS'21 '09"W 36.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S71'3S'51"W 10.00 FEET; THENCE NlS'21'09"W 365.00
FEET; THENCE N71'3S'51"E 10.00 FEET; THENCE SIS'21'09"E
365.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
WPC 5951E
\'1- 5
,
.
\-.- ',-:C 1-:
'Y/\Y ~/______
,.-- ,,-;-:' r;.,
'-) ~ v:c-
File No.
PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARlNG DATE /J\ CO s) /<::to! d'
SUBJECT ~..;:Ld ~ ~ '1 "I\M~ r ~ \r~
LOCATION 114D &l~.. ~ ~ CO~U ~Q~ ")
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION -- BY FAX ~BY HAND _; BY MAIL
4/dS(Q::r
PUBLICATION DATE
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS
'{ J2. ~
NO. MAILED -riA ~~
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK /" 4 /;:.~/ <1d-'
I I
COPIES TO:
Administration (4) (/'
Planning i"'/
Originating Department
Engineering /'
Others
City Clerk's Office (2)
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
-58.
,
.,-.1
~
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING
BY THE CHUlA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA, CAUFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public
hearing to consider the following:
Considering an amendment to the EastLake II General
Development Plan, EastLake Greens Site Utilization Plan and
the EastLake I (Expanded) Planned Community District
Regulations for Parcels R-24 and R-25, consisting of 5.0 acres
and 7.4 acres, respectively.
Considering a request for vacation of an easement for sewer
purposes at 1144 Broadway. In accordance with Resolution of
Intention No. 16587.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, May 5, 1992,
at 4:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at
which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED:
April 22, 1992
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
r
NOTICEOF~UCHE~G
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY
COUNCIL of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering a request for vacation of
an easement for sewer purposes. In accordance with ~ 8333 of the California Streets and
Highways Code, a public service easement may be vacated by the City Council after a public
hearing is held to consider the matter. The vacation request was filed by the Price Company.
Details are available in the Department of Public Works, Engineering Division.
Staff is recommending that the vacation be granted by Council after finding that all facts exist
warranting the vacation. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior
to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL, in accordance with
Council Resolution of Intention No. 16587 , on Tuesday, MAY 5. 1992
at 6:00 p.m.. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which
time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED:
APRIL 22, 1992
ENGNRG. FILE NO. PV-QSO
C\J
-J
UJ
U
0:
~
I:> )..
~ ~
<::l <::l
;:! ~
Ii! 9:
III
<::>
...
....: ...
It) ...
...
~
~~
/
\.-
A~MO~O~8
.... 0
z uJ
~ t:;
...-"
~~Q) ~
.......:::;
a::~1.LI
"'~aJ
~...
~~o
0"'1-
T - ____n
_L ___;;-: ____
-----:::.::lL ___" __ _ ____
-J
UJ
U
0:
<t
a..
)..
~~
~~
<::>
t:~
... ...
ll:~
...
I
I
a
.... uJ
~ ~
w.-u
~:< c(
w..... >
a:zw
~~aJ
~~o
",;jl-
L~___
r,:F,r-::-.:---=
'u
'"
'"
"1
I~';I
'"
-=--=.~==.-::~::.:: =-===:_=_:.:t:,'
----
----
~
<::>
...
I-.
~
'"
~
....
z
...
ol4.l~
w~cn
..........
.. ...
U~2
g~o
"'...a:
a:VI"-
S~,a
,L9~
VI
N
VI
N
L
I-
UJ
UJ
0:
I-
U'l
o
0:
o
U.
x
o
CD
~
-
CD
-
::c
x
I&J
.
.
618-280-21
INVESTMENTS CHULA VISTA L P
P.O. BOX 948
FAIRFIELD, IA 52556
618-280-34
ALLRED FAMILY LIVING TRUST
1660 HOTEL CIR N. #200
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108
.
618-200-54
TPRC, INC.
7979 IVANHOE AVENUE #524
LA JOLLA, CA 92037
618-280-22
OXFORD 635
705 TWELFTH AVENUE
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item \ ~
Meeting Date 05/05/92
ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS:
For 1992-93 the City of Chula Vista will receive a CDBG
entitlement of $1,380,000. The City estimates that $181,000 of
CDBG program income will also be available. The City proposes
to use these funds for public facilities and improvements, social
services, fair housing, and other community development needs.
These activities will primarily benefit low and moderate income
families, with a minimum of 70 percent of the funds targeted to
benefit low-income households.
The following Community Development Objectives are proposed:
[1] Provide assistance to organizations serving the varied needs of
senior citizens and youth and their families;
[2] Provide assistance to organizations providing counseling to
adults recovering from substance abuse or involved in domestic
violence, basic needs assistance to homeless or disabled persons,
and tutoring to adults who are illiterate;
[3] Construct public improvements and facilities;
[4] Promote small businesses and job creation;
[5] Provide assistance to community organizations for
neighborhood revitalization and affordable housing;
[6] Furnish fair housing information and counseling services.
Community Development Director
City Manager
t,.,.S'
(4/5ths Vote: Yes
No_X">
The City of Chula Vista will receive $1,380,00 in CDBG entitlement funds and anticipates
receiving program income of about $181,000 from the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation revolving
fund. The 1992-93 CDBG Notebook contains the Program Summary, Funding
Recommendations, and Project Descriptions. Page references in this report are to specific pages
in the CDBG Notebook.
This public hearing provides an opportunity for citizens to comment on how CDBG funds can
be allocated to meet the City's housing and community development needs. No staff
recommendations are being made at this time and the City Council is not expected to take any
action on the proposed budget other than to give desired direction. After thorough consideration
of public comment, staff will prepare an additional report presenting funding recommendations
for Council deliberation and action at a regularly scheduled meeting to be held on May 19,
1992.
\ <6 -,
Page 2, Item \~
Meeting Date 05/05/92
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing on housing and
community development needs and accept the staff report on the 1992-93 CDBG program, and
direct staff to return on May 19, 1992 with the funding recommendation report.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Montgomery Planning Committee
has held a public hearing and made recommendations on Community Development and Capital
Improvement projects in the Montgomery area (see page 8). The Commission on Aging, Human
Relations Commission, Childcare Commission, and Youth Commission have reviewed the social
service funding requests and have made funding recommendations (see page 21-23). The
Housing Advisory Committee has reviewed three housing-related proposals and made
recommendations (see page 9).
DISCUSSION:
Introduction: ProDosed Bud2et
For the 1992-93 CDBG program, the City of Chula Vista has total estimated revenue of
$1,568,200. This includes the annual entitlement ($1,380,000), program income funds from
housing rehabilitation loans ($181,000), and County CDBG funds remaining from completed
projects ($7200). The total amount of funding requested, which includes all funding requests
from community organizations, is summarized as follows:
Administration and Planning
Social Services Fundin2 (28 requests)
Section 108 Loan Repayment (Norman Park)
Caoital Improvement Proiects (5 projects)
Community Development Proiects (7 requests)
$245,000
$550,000
$294,850
$675,000
$243,857
The total amount of funding requested exceeds the total amount of CDBG revenue by about
$440,500. Program regulations place a 15 percent cap on social service funding, which will
limit the social services allocation to about $220,000; this is $330,000 less than the total amount
requested. A detailed preliminary 1992-93 CDBG program budget is in the Notebook (pp. 1
and 2).
In order to be eligible for funding, a project or service must address at least one of the CDBG
national objectives which are: 1) Benefit primarily low and moderate-income families, 2) Aid
in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight, or 3) Meet other community needs having
a particular urgency.
The City has previously adopted the 1990-91 to 1992-93 Community Development Plan (see
pages 3 and 4). This Plan outlines the City's specific community development goals and
objectives for the CDBG program and provides a guide for making allocations.
In order to fund three of the Community Development proposals (Chula Vista Building and
Housing Community Appearance Program, SBCS Graffiti Eradication, and SBCS Community
,t..:t.
Page 3, Item If)
Meeting Date 05/05/92
Development Corp.) the City will need to make a finding that these activities are necessary and
appropriate in order to meet the goals and objectives of the City's Community Development
Plan.
Social Service Fundin!! Reouests
The City received over 28 requests for social services funding from non-profit community
organizations, totaling over $550,000. All of the requests for funding are included in the
Notebook under the Social Services Projects section and a summary is found on pages
14-20.
For 1992-93, the City may allocate up to $220,000 for social service organizations, which
is 15 percent of the entitlement and estimated program income. An additional $91,000 of
unanticipated program income program from housing rehabilitation loans will accumulate
during this fiscal year. This unanticipated program income has not been included in the
15 percent calculation; if it were to be included the social service allocation could be
increased to $233,650.
All 28 of the funding requests from social service organizations are CDBG-eligible as they
meet the national objective to primarily benefit low-income families. The Commission on
Aging, Human Relations Commission, Childcare Commission, and Youth Commission
have reviewed the social service funding requests and have made their recommendations
(see page 21-23). Staff has prepared a Proposal Comparison Table for the Commissions
and Council to use in evaluating the proposals (see inside front cover).
As the requests for CDBG funding from community organizations increases from one year
to the next, the funding decisions become more difficult. As a general policy, the City has
sought to discourage dependence on CDBG funding and to encourage seed funding for new
programs. A breakdown showing new and previously-funded programs is attached (see
page 12).
Communitv DeveloDment Proiect Summarv
The City received several proposals from neighborhood-based organizations and the Chula
Vista Elementary School District. They have been grouped under the category of
"Community Development". Staff has determined that these proposals are eligible for
CDBG funding, will primarily benefit low-income households, and are not subject to the
15 percent social services cap.
The Community Development requests total $243,857 and include the following types of
activities: 1) neighborhood revitalization; 2) affordable housing development; and, 3)
capital improvements for non-profit community facilities. All of the requests for funding
are included in the Notebook under the Community Development Projects section and are
summarized as follows:
\i;~
Page 4, Item l ~
Meeting Date 05/05/92
. Nei~hborhood Revitalization
Community Appearance Program
$36,000
In cooperation with local neighborhood groups, the Building and Housing Dept.
proposes to continue their neighborhood beautification campaigns. The funding
requested will pay for staff coordination, dumpsters and equipment.
Graffiti Eradication
$43,657
South Bay Community Services (SBCS), in partnership with the Chula Vista Police
Department, is requesting funds to continue their community effort to eradicate
graffiti painted on private businesses and residences. Youth offenders and community
volunteers provide the labor. Funds are requested for the Program Coordinator
position.
. Affordable Housin~ Development
SBCS Community Development Corporation
$52,000
South Bay Community Services (SBCS) is requesting funding to continue their
Community Development program. During the past year, SBCS has become active
on two affordable housing projects: 1) the preservation of 4 federally-subsidized
apartment projects which are "at-risk" of conversion to market-rate; and, 2)
rehabilitation of a 26-unit apartment project for very-low income and homeless
families.
. CaDital ImDrovement for Non-profit Community Facilities
Boys and Girls Club of Chula Vista-Counters
$5,000
The Club is requesting funds to purchase and install permanent counters in their
Oleander St. building. The countertops will help define activity areas as well as
provide work and storage space.
Chula Vista Elementary School District-Playgrounds
$100,000
The School District is requesting funds to improve playgrounds at four elementary
school sites: Rice, Lauderbach, Montgomery, and Castle Park. These playgrounds
will be open for community use after school hours and on weekends.
Woodlawn Park Community Center-Roof
$7,200
The Center has a leaky roof which needs replacement. Cost of a new roof is roughly
equal to the amount of County CDBG funds remaining from completed projects.
,~ ..'\
Page 5, Item \ ~
Meeting Date 05/05/92
The Montgomery Planning Committee reviewed the Capital Improvement and
Community Development projects affecting the Montgomery Area (see minutes in
Notebook, page 8). They prioritized these projects and recommended funding levels
as follows:
1. Woodlawn Park Community Center
la. Palm Ave. Drainage Improvements
2. Otay Committee
3. Neighborhood Rev. Program, Otay Phase II
4. SBCS Graffiti Eradication
5. C.V.B.&H. Community Appearance Program
6. South Chula Vista Library
7. C.V. Elementary School Dist.- Playgrounds
Annrt
$100,000
unknown
5,000
350,000
43,657
No consensus
217,500
No consensus
The Committee recommended no funding for the Murals Program. They could not
reach consensus on the level of funding for the Community Appearance Program or
Playgrounds.
The Committee recommended an increase in funding for the Woodlawn Park
Community Center in order to make the facility safer and more functional. They also
would like to develop the parkland across the street and make it part of the Center.
The level of funding recommended reflects the Committee's desire to spend $100,000
on Woodlawn Park rather than on the four Chula Vista Elementary School District
playgrounds.
The Committee added the Palm A venue Drainage Improvements (in Broderick Acres)
to the list as their top priority along with Woodlawn Park. The County completed
design of this project 2 years ago. At about the same time, the City transferred
approximately $125,000 in remaining funds (for construction) from the Palm Ave.
Drainage project to the Orange and Fourth Park/Library project. The estimate for
construction of the Palm Ave. Drainage Improvements is approximately $250,000.
Caoital Imorovement Proiect SummarY
The proposed budget for five capital improvement projects is $675,000. In addition, the
City must begin repayment of the Section 108 loan for the Norman Park Senior Center
Renovation ($294,850). All of the CIP detail sheets are included in the Notebook under
the Capital Improvement Projects section and are summarized as follows:
Neighborhood Revitalization Program
$350,000
This proposal is for design and construction of missing public improvements in Otay.
This is the second phase of improvements, which includes sidewalks, curbs, gutters,
,~~~
Page 6, Item \ ~
Meeting Date 05/05/92
and street lights. The Otay Committee recommends this proposal as the top priority
for their neighborhood.
South Chula Vista Library
$217,500
This allocation is necessary to ensure that construction of the South Chula Vista
Library can begin in 1993. The slowdown in construction activity has meant that
revenues to the Library DIF (a primary source of funds for the construction) are
temporarily decreased from what staff had originally projected. Also, since Library
DIP Funds are received over many, many years, part of the funding from this source
may not be accumulated in time for the construction of this project and Block Grant
Funds over the next two-three years may be necessary to complete the funding of this
library .
HV AC, Main Library
$50,000
The existing HV AC system has surpassed its useful life and needs replacement. The
new system will have a higher Energy Efficiency Rating which will reduce electrical
energy consumption.
Parking Lot Reconstruction, Main Library
$44,950
This work is necessary to preserve and extend the service life of the existing
pavement.
Murals Program
$12,550
These funds are to be used to paint one or more murals on graffiti-covered walls.
The murals will enhance cultural diversity, beautify the community, and involve local
youth.
Plannine and Fair Housin!! Proiect Summarv
The proposed budget for 1992-93 includes $165,000 for program administration and staff
costs. These administrative costs represent less than 11 percent of the total budget and
includes staff costs for coordination, accounting, monitoring sub-recipients, environmental
review, and reporting requirements.
The City has received three requests for funding which are eligible planning and
administrative activities; these requests for funding total $80,000. The requests for funding
from the S.D. Fair Housing Council and Chula Vista Human Services Committee are
included in the Notebook and are summarized as follows:
It.fD
Page 7, Item t~
Meeting Date 05/05/92
Chula Vista Fair Housing Program
$55,060
CDBG regulations require the City to undertake proactive Fair Housing activities.
With assistance from Resident Relations and the Chicano Federation, the San Diego
Fair Housing Council will provide a comprehensive fair housing program in Chula
Vista. Their proposed activities include education and outreach, a tenant-landlord
hotline, follow-up on discrimination complaints, and fair housing assessments. This
program is designed to comply with HUD requirements.
Chula Vista Human Service Council
$20,000
The Human Services Council builds coalitions among Chula Vista area social service
providers in order to bring more funding for needed services into the South Bay. The
funds are requested to hire a part-time coordinator.
Otay Committee
$5,000
The Otay Committee has requested $5,000 in funding to continue volunteer
community revitalization and beautification efforts, in conjunction with the
Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP). Committee activities include
tree-planting, a Community Fair, quarterly newsletter, and neighborhood clean-up
campaign.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City will receive $1,380,000 in CDBG entitlement funds and about
$181,000 in program income. The 15 percent cap on social services funding will limit the social
services allocation to a maximum of $233,650. In addition, the City is obligated to repay the
Section 108 loan over the next 3 years; the total payments for 1992-93 total $294,850.
[C:IWP51ICOUNCILIl13SICDBGFY92.113]
1<t-1
. State of California - Health and Welfare Arzencv
-
. DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION
678 '!'bird A...."". Suite 205
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Voice - (619) 426-8720
TOD - (619) 422-3587
PETE WILSON. Governor
Q
April 30, 1992
\
A
.,
-----.' ~..
TO WHOM IT MAYCONCERN:
As a vocational rehabilitation counselor for the California Department of
Rehabilitation, I frequently refer clients to the Chula Vista Literacy Team for
remedial instruction in basic reading and writing skills -so essential for an'effective
job search. Many of our consumers are learning disabled, and having an adult literacy
program here in Chula Vista is a tremendous resource to help make our entire Chula
Vista community vigorously literate.
Literacy is more crucial than ever to our economic strength. Please continue funding
the Chula Vista Public Library's Literacy Team.
x~'~
ChMho ~
Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor
CS:kk
/~-I
"i EOOCATlOIAL CIIISULTlIlIi SERYICES
P.D. BoI 422
a.n... CA 91908
{619) 41g-4362
00
A,ril. 28.1992
l
Delf He_r.llle n. IlMer: i
,
CITY C0UI~CIL GFflCES
CH:JLto Vl3:A, CA
We Itnll!)l, .r.- 1O..1Id tile en, C8.1ICi1 _.Ilen t8 C8.ti.. t8 f.1Id tile
CII.,. Yist. P.lllie Ullrar,'s Utene, Tea. II, ."rlYill!) tile ea....n'
DeYeI.,_.t Blect Gr.at.
We. as "ult teacllen." C8as.,t8.ts. IIaYe vert. vitll tile CII.,. Yilt.
Uterae, T... .i_ ns f.r_ti... It Itu '1...... vit.1 r.le i. - rlllWn'
Uves i I tile Se.n Be" .rea.
HI., _tive .,..till!) ...It lear..n. vile .re lOt f.aeti.101 i. tile EII!)Ii.1I
I....... IIIId ...-t8-... tut.rill!l. vlliell is _t IYIIn.llle iI.,.r.- elassr...
.tnet.re. Tile ...It K...., el_.re _t 1II1i,,.. t. -.t t......ns;
"vever. tile ..tvertill!l.... Iletwee. __ ...It sc...., el_ .Id tile ell.ll
Yistl Literae, Tea. Itu eRlllled tllese speeilllearaen t.ltetil _ lives."
C8.ti... 1Iev. tile rllll t. lit.ne,.
Pl_ C8asi*r tllese less f.rt....e ".lts. vile live i. tile Seatll Be,. vile.
.n_till!) ..ies fn. tile Ca....n' Devel.,_.t Blaet Gra.t.
5i_rel,.
i.
f'
/JJJ-t ~
L,... Belt.. PII,ms Gillespie
~~
lIlise Sti...r
~
..
,
l~~/O
=
.
Escondido Public Library . Adult Literacy Program
239 South Kalmia Street. Escondido. CA 92025. Phone: (619) 747-2233
~ !
April 30, 1992
Mayor Timothy Nader
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mayor Nader:
'.
I know you are aware of the high costs of illiteracy, but
I am sending you a fact sheet just as a reminder of these
tremendous personal and financial costs to our society.
The Chu1a Vista Literacy Team has applied for community block
grant funding this spring. I would like to encourage you to
support this excellent group.
The CVLT not only works with adults who do not know how to read,
but they incorporate reading tutoring into family activities
as well. Children are also benefitting from the CVLT work.
Please consider the importance of the Chula Vista Literacy Team
in our community.
Respectfully,
~ I /
['/ il.J.J, '\.-.V./J/.1 UJyl --.....
Lori Dubrawka
Coordinator
Ild
enclosure
I ~ - /1
~/7
May 2, 1992
To:
The Mayor and Members of the City Council
Chula Vista, California
This letter is written to urge you to continue funding
the Chula Vista Literacy Team. There are about 200 people
currently being served by the program - -each being taught
by a volunteer tutor.
A more literate community affects the quality of life for
us all and raises the economic level of the area. Many
learners are heads of families, thus touching the lives of
children in a ripple effect.
I have a more than passing interest in seeing' the program
continue. I organized and operated the program as a full
time volunteer for one year for the Altrusa Club in a coop-
erative venture with the Chula Vista Public Library and the
Sweetwater Adult School.
Having met and worked with the County Literacty Network, I
will state unequivocally that Meg Schofield is the finest
and most capable director in the county.
please fund this program that does so much for so many people.
I have interviewed many who need to upgrade their reading
skills in order to improve their capacity to earn a better
living for their families.
t~~~
)0-/;)-
. .
~k:
I. Lli>M'/
u~~~- ~1ir~ /m
em C(J[j~'~92 / .
. CHULA'~s!L,QF~. .
. 'A, CA
.
JIm M9?J/f/C
;?}I9YtJ-e} ~ ~
.
~Ltm&~.M.aAv &du~ ./~/J//1// zkun,
9~~~~~.~~~ .
. ~ ~/I//hI1AA/ ~ .
~~~~dj}' . $v
t/) .&w&~a//~~
ahd-d;t;;:~ " ~~~
~~~-t~)::iz~ .
t!j;.t=/~~~z~~
cd ~ ~ ,;;!6.. ~d I_,&. ~,()/ k
&/I1~)t& /5 /YtJT .5Tt/~/z:; J kk~~ ;
&jl}dt: i ~4lu"tl &~r~
f j) . tJ -r "" J _ /J J_
, /~ aL A (!,Vt'.,T ~ atJ/M
PtadM-mJ~ M-a v~ k7~dtJ~
h h{)AKr A J )// /VYV) tIJ B {J- ~, Ytkv ~
~ ,~;r;;;~ ~~ .4Wdd, t/tJ.u-
iVJ~, . ~t1-i?~~ /~/~j'
~ ~-a:J' '
NinaRAdrian l~ d~f ~ ~ .
. 12371stAve ~ . (./. {)J /J '}
ChulaVlSlaCA 91911-34m / %' - /. a?'~ /T) 7~fP -7 lIPS'
.
.
.
.
.
4-10-92
Hi Jaem,
Well just want to tell you about a school that I been
going to these past few years. It's the "Literacy Team."
it's a school were adults can go and get help you need to
lrean how to read. I like it because there are so many nice
and understanding people there at the Literacy Team. I
never saw so many good, careing people before in one place.
The best part about it is that you have your own special
touter. it's just you and your touter working together in a
room by you selfs at your own pace. I like it because I
dont have to be in a class room full with a whole punch of
people. I go twice a week every tuesdays and thursdays for
a hour and a half each time i going and I look forward in
going every time.
There not only helping me but also my kids too. My
touter Sue sign me up with one program that the literacy
team has for parents with children under the age of six.
They give my kids books to keep for then to read or for. me
to read to then. We also get invited to the library where
there are other parents and thier kids.
There is this lady she as so many grate craft ideas
that she shares with all of us parents. She shows us how to
make diffennt things. once she show us how to make a
flannal board and things to use with it like how to make the
picture stick on to the board by sanding the backs of the
picture with sand paper and were to find pictures to use
from magizes, colering books. They are showing us how to
read to our kids and how inporten it is for then to be able
to have books of there own. I really think it's a good
thing for me to go there to learn how to read to my kids
better. Ruby realy likes this one book that we reseaved
from the program a couply of months ago. "Always and
Forever" is the name of the book. With this book instead of
reading it they played a tape. I really liked the way the
guy in the tape read the story. Now I am trying to read it
the same way. You know it was really hard for me to read to
my kids but now that I been going to these family meeting
its been getting alot easyer for me.
I an planing on saveing all the books for when my kids
get old and have children of thier own. Then they can read
to thier children the same storys they injoyed when they
were kids there self.
Well thats all for now intil next time.
from Barbara
/0//1
.
.
.
.
~
April 30, 1992
Tim Nader, Mayor
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista CA 91910
L.. ,:.>- !bi
C~':""Y-'''._._m."......J
IJ f c~ 'iJ ;','! r,;;- ~,.:.,:..
U"Tjt<'\7:'~'::,.r"...t.:S:
"" . 'Of". CA
Dear Mr. Nader,
On May 5, 1992, the City Council will be hearing a request to distribute
funds from a Community Development Block Grant. Without the support
from these moneys the Chula Vista Literacy Team will cease to exist.
Please don't let this happen.
In February of 1990, I was assigned a 25 year old, functionally
illiterate, welfare mother with four children. She was not able to read
and understand the notes sent home by her children's school nor could
she write notes to the teachers or explain why her children were home
sick or leave a note for her children if she wasn't home when they came
from school. She could not read a cookbook because she didn't know what
the abbreviations meant. She had seen a skull and crossbones sign, but
didn't know it meant poison, nor could she even read that word. She
took public transportation everywhere, but could not read a map. She
has no second language.
Now, two years later, this young mother has learned to read a cook-book,
to read and shop food ads, fill out forms, read maps, and write notes
for her children. She uses the library to get books for her children
and has even read a novel or two.
As my learner's self-confidence grows, so does her desire for a high
school diploma. She has a way to go before she can pass the GED, but we
are working on the skills she needs to do so. There is no doubt in my
mind that, in time, it will happen.
This young mother is not alone in the phenomenal benefits of this
program. In March, 1992, I attended a conference on Family Literacy
sponsored by the California State Library Board. This was my first
experience as a tutor to be with a large group of formerly functionally
illiterate adults, who had come to this conference to share their
experiences of not being able to read in an adult society. The praises
they sang for the program and the changes it made in their 1 ives was
totally awe-inspiring.
With my learner's permission, I am enclosing a typed copy of a
first-draft writing assignment that we were working on even before we
heard that the Literacy Team may be in financial trouble. In this
assignment, she was to share with a friend the benefits of the Family
Literacy Program she and her children participate in. It illustrates the
tremendous progress she has made.
Please continue support of this wonderful program.
Sincerely, J ~
~.~
Susan 1. Hyatt
Volunteer
C.V. Literacy Team
J?!~/5
C! u~ .;JJ"'- J'I'~
oJ, ~ m~'" 7r-Ja".1..../1 ~ ~ '--""~,,; -rr
...I~ /' .."'....A 1-' ..fl. ~ c, _it: .." e??' .J 7'
JL CAd.J u:.~'/:.1 {l~. IL..U' /~/~ L_1j., '.
J~~~~ ~t/~ ~ ~
-R.._.I.a" :_d~ ~ I~;".I'~ q~ "'".:I.... d/~'--' ~
J~ ~~ ~./ m~O~ (.7'.~. Cl-<1.J
.J~~<~~~~""~
h-J ~ ~ ~ ;r~~ .J~. ~.I,~.J
~~_~'e.(~ ~~ r~~
~_I"'<-'';'j ~7':;t-v~ -~.. ";: ~ e. ~4C:4L.
~~ ~~..<.(L ~ ~'1'.R,~. .
//1/ ~ ~ ~ ~<. / h''''-GV~ ;/'-../
~/...~ o-..~~ 4 ~ v _~..L;- ~ -?<':".J-~ -,!!'LL.. ~
/ -r -"J. ~
#e..t/ a4....uv ~b. ~..~.1 ~ ~~ ~ C!.JJ. x,p..... ~ ",t:f.4. ~"'#
~~~"'~ ./-<'---' ~~~~~
",H4f..-"..;t~ Lz:.U7~' ~ c4........ ~
~.
-o:J~~~~~ ~~~
~~';/~ ~ ~/~/ ...~.....,~~~ ~
.,j.t:..~,.4/~ ~ ./...~~~ ~~~". ..../. e'f',"'..... u
~ ~~ ~"'~....// ~ ~ P':;;~'
Gk~..... ~ ~ r!4....C;.......?:..:,.) 7' ~.3~~. r
r----_
i' [1, ff-!J: [l a \17 m '.
il n<! rffl)
_wJL:~~~__t~ /!!Jj
tell) t:;.. 0'-
ei-:,_; ~"'.~i> ~ei€S
~
Y77 ~~. ~~. .fI__
r /T)=:?'~ -
/2"/0
.
. i t' 'i-;~-nl \\:'-'';.-r::'~-.l
Ui,.~-LU \:; i_S j
':/! _.~~~~, i I
U.. MA' I I,OC' il~1
L ...... v~_ 'L:)
CJ;';'r:,-;-'.,,~ ,-.-~,J
I, "'.~.,-,; ,._' . '~t.r _.'~
C-' ';." \';';-1:' C/'-~
..' J:r7/1?-
.
DeCA.~ MtZ.MC<..,/o-c
7h/~rd:-Vo u . +-0 nok. V
,
hotrl tAl pof?-fe-n-(- CVLT
... L5.f-6 Me_L_J-.__h""l/.ep-~.s.,5 . .-,.-
0-- TU RJ!F mo--n c-<-j€. met C GRse.
The.+ .'h/o.-sj tl poRtet\,t ro NY
Jo t3 /"\ Y Re.ed.i 11' ho...s In pRoved
tc,rr>1 6<... on€- -to..five.1 ..feel
:r ~r'1 0.... much .:stRoy\e'R. pe~.>OYl
...I- he. e- d. .m oce.. H elf' '
. PI-GA $EGj vG mo.Re rn 6 ne..y
fo fhe I-lfERAC.Y teCLrn.
TH.t'.5
I $ PI Y F Jf<~+- L-e:l+e R
3~jl/J~
Glen Abbe}T
'MEMORIAL PARK and MORTUARY
3838 80nita Road, Bonita California 92002
BRYON J. WINNER
Superintendent
Bus.: 425-8700
.
)8'- /7
,
. ,~
.
_.__. ._________n~.ken---:rrj'- _lVll.L .;n..~1-.b_~__I.L'r! t Q.hL .r e .~;, J
n.----?:r1:LJ-€r.JA..rJ__Jh~-kf~t~J -/-0 -~J-/;-e-----A.e+- h 0 YW e 10 Of K
-; .:L ~1L Cd...J>Ci.~ J~P_:L.M1'-_____'hL_h._Ll_.~-E {" 6 /) -f.-:r- .
. .______._bfJ r~L-- bu- +h.i.___b_('..( i_ _r...~ O!.~J.sL._jJtJf, of: Jl S h ~
.--..--c;rvLe_.- Jh::._QhJ;j_..s:qIJ:~~~om mr,..bO~~,L-dQ t:-y'-~=:ihq t ~
------.-s.CL1-.J-.dClh---K I'll hl1'6 f J -L---9;~--_ILK-n-_--
.. -. ....-----l..h J~.,~_L~f5eI_6n!'.S.{1. Q -1-ILJ.-<c~~__ .__
-.---
__h_. __~_tJL_11U.~Lt2_~r feel VI10 recOh!;-J (Jh-t~
.. .----__T-ceo.j_iP.__mltr..;.t? ft __-f:l,e,_Lv,.s.11...J.'~ tJ.'gJ.LL_~" J .I:
.-~-- &i1.w_n~ 1"", t+ b-5[ . 111 _t;. o...l1-,-,-.J_E,jl. (hJ1- -1- hI' G r 1->1.1
. ..___.3b.o..i.....j:h;{; ..{'ehd.____t5-.o_IJLJ:.(..~;. W;+h rill.:r .
. .. _n .- __dQnl1,QIlnjn)lKe._ ._! ha.-1-..--___r__,t'J?_ '<- L...JCi_o.M -fo .
--- .-__h.\ tI.t' l~i2..Q .-:.W; t h he{ L'm._ JeAf-'t1 jQ7..-Jlx\-O-f(J 0 J-
u-----.ff(icf/ciJ'\i. tVl O( ~... 13 lo-i_.o.L.dJ_ff.etih.CL_ .__.__
- -- .--- h,y -hore /5 -fo I~Qr hl11ore-~_bJ___J()_.Id.~f'.dt;___
. -f€rfecf, JOme ~c'l :r- boy€- +o_.J,CJ -!:ol'Yle--+-h~nJ
. ._u__tC'f._ f11fn:Jf- tv ,Jh--l'Yjr--^-e.l,~'L-.1eQ,;!..tu~--,--
--_.,-----~---._---~--_._~-~--------------- - - ---- -.- --- ---- -- - ._~-----------~-- --------.------
.- -~--------------_.._-------~---- .._-~---~-----------._- -- __no ________..____ ... ~__________~___
.
)5/~
, 'r I:c U' U \OL~~i .
, ..' -'--~--~--'~i \ Annette Arlan
:\'.' _ O~? f I
____ ~~,;~c~~~j. L_;~~:..m~ __
~o-~::z,01~-;~~M-~
_ ~~dd&_-hU"L~~--
_ _ ._jA~,J~u.-- i-_H",'C.n-
-~ ~--~-- . ~~-~/-_.
jtu ~N' t:::::i-~-~
_+OvJ~/.~ .-~. ~ rfJ4----
_+c~3c) ~~~J-c1J~'-~---
...~ j. .0-1~ __V::J::L ~ w-e ~ . - -
. \
--~~ ~-~:- .-' -,- ....-....-
...-...~.- .~..--Q-y'WU.- --~ -. 1-' .--.-
_ -f)I.-JQ~~-~~'--------
_~__ - ....._...._____ _.__.. __n ._____ __......_._~_._ _____ ___ _______________..n_.....____ .--..---.- -.---- .0-- -- --- -- ,---- --
______j~~~-0'-1~-~. - ----
--.--..-------.- -- - "---....----- ---- -.----" -- ._--_..__._--_._---~- ,-~..._._--_.._-_..--- ----- --.---.-
_________ _ _"_ -- -- -- .----fi7~J---n-----
------ _..---- -- - --.
____ _ _ _ . _ _ ___.. ~ (UG-vL. -
-- --- -- _.-,--- --- ..---_.'-----'.- --- ...--- -
---4~; ~j);J;:d'~-/.A7;Aj-fUU-/7~
__'u____" -~_.- -.----- - .--~.-- ".,
/o~ Ii
.
.
.
.
,. -''''''-''-','_r'_ ._'-'~_",_'7"''''''~_'"'
I ';'l f< i:' ~ n "I'" fi' ~
,t' LS"'l5U~l' ~
,IL, ~~---- I
' 'j, f
I: [,j ,I I,
1i,'1 11.\' \ jF" IiJ'
I:""': .,..,~, . . ~-,)
, L ·
I ,,-,- .J
, G"
\
l.._.._........ ~.. _,_._ _ ___ .___,.~.~~"nj
April 27, 1992
The Honorable Tim Nader
Chula Visa City Council
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
Dear Mayor Nader and Council Members:
Please continue to fund the Chula Vista Literacy Team.
I am a volunteer member of that Team and our Team is making
a difference in the lives of the citizens of Chula Vista.
One of my learners has gone on to job promotions and a more
secure life for her family instead of being fired for not
being able to read well. Another learner is now in college.
Please consider the Chula Vista Literacy Team a vital part of
Chula Vista's community programs. Our Team meeds the full
amount of the Community Development Block Grant to continue
helping Chula Vistans ~ucceed.
Yours truly,
~~f{,!!:1f
Bonita, California 91902
/ 6'~ c7. {}
-, .4-':. -."-.---- _.------T'_---._'_---.~ ..1-.--.-------.;;.:. - --.-........ ,- - - - '- \ - ...-- - ~ ,. -
"
i!
- --~--~---~-----~-----~ -- -- ~
. . 1; -- .-.. n.___.__._ . - c. .
.Ii, M.lli SU\~.I~ ~~_..Jm}\j~ .. - ..1':' M ^' .....ffi\ILJ~,-.
. "11' . ~- ,- -:- "-UJllj~,,,,\
.11~ . ,\0I\.~.ll. ~'~~~,,~",~noll':"~.--=
="~.f~~~~~'~"'::~=~ ... :.
.....~jl~.~-D\. , . ... . c ~~
.____...j~~.1 .b~Lb- Jtlt"~'I\\-4rll\l\~~ (>^nun~~____~
__'.' .._ c,.~~_~~ ."'_____"'"
..___.,.n ....._.. j ..__.. ________...._.______. .
. .n_"_I..__;:\k_~k~~l~-.--.-.-.
..-. ..-- u. :i~.~.~=tA ~.~~.i\~.~.Q.3S_-...
un' __.._ 'l~o\1.J\MX\-~-~~.~~ . .
.. ..r.~!il~. .i\~~~~,~~,,~ol\h
. ..... .i;!!""'"" ~. ~. . . ~~....kl1\<l<JJc ...
11___.j,,'~ ~..~lL~M,.j~..C1J'o .~ '~4-~--'
· ....liF'F-~.:r-~~~~ ........
.. ~~u\c' ..~nu._~_~.~~.-~--~
~ __ .___.. _.__u__..._._ _____._ _. ......'" __.'.m."__ .u.. .__. _.
..--...--.. .,ull .n.__......._..._..~.__..__._... .--.. .-.-.--.-. --..---- --....
..__.___._.jl.~(l~~~.Q..~~~. .-.
.._" ... _ ~'-~~:n.~~.:Bl~~~~--~ ,'..--
..... -1 ~.: ""'... ~~L......=~ -.-. _= :.
...--.---.--.-1..---.-.J~--'\~~~~.WL.~-
._._ .... .--.1 ~-.-- ...--..--.. .._......'._n___. ......_.u,..uu... .....--. .-....--.-.-.:
II
.::_--==_1- u._=};,~= _ = .. ... -= =1
.'._ ___. ' M N\o 1\ ..
. _____... u..... _.. ... ... VO-~""'-
. .__ _ !..I ~ 1._. _.__ .j!,.:ill"f'~ '0 ffi- W.1.\'\ 1'\ ~.J' -..
.. ... ~.-..i ... ----- '-C"
.
, , 1
; !
.
) r -- 02.::L-
o &1l0['fJfi .
n f:; f:;19!lr ~
t: rIiEJ!;I/(}t( cf 6u!lltlt II/AfJ>Eft.!. CITMJi~iW~~gFFiCES
CI17 O~ (JllrJJI9 P;fTIJ,~___:___O~'CA______.J.
f fn f'I' w'dttJ t/.f(;1! J~ '1/'</0 '/'11/ 0Wl/#-
/}'/~tJ IP~ fIlL (};tJM V;STA /bBl.IC l/eMJ?y"
L, r~1?1cy 1/'/ltfI.
f ';"1I~ l'~rN It Yo&(jjd/EEf\ 1t51'<. 011 tt/If
tEAM r;,f tV/R~'1 /I Y4"/fI{. fi 1<; ,Mtlf'T
tJ,n1~Yll.16 1'4 ..!'~E -4 U/I,/,ntI'$ ,. L'GIf'lJ
(J(} RrJ'" ~~,J f/~ ,fE.t1!l5 AN''!. ~""',fLJKt/iJs.1
M- Al'r/(,fetl1rE ypv~ JUfff?~/.
Don E. Smith /.
"URNlTU.. MANUPACTU.IID"IIIINU&NTAnv. ( ~Jt"l ~j) )
.'0 CARLA AV.,.U& Y
CHULAYI8TA.CALI~""HIA_ (fl9,O
teu) ..1-....
f)~2
.
.
~1!ri
jl (t)/
Jg~ J:J
.
.
.
0000
0000
ROHR
ROHR INDUSTRIES. INC.
POST OFFICE BOX B 7B
CHULA VISTA CAliFORNIA 92012-0878
(619) 691-4111 . TELEX, 69-503B
April 30, 1992
The Honorable Tim Nader
Mayor, City of Chula Vista
Chula Vista, California
; ~;: ' ;
! .. JJ
[, . - - -;.~-,"~,J ......1
;~..;;;_.~~;' .
,
L
Dear Mayor Nader:
I am asking you and the City Council to keep the Chula Vista Literacy Team's doors open.
The Literacy Team enables English-speaking adults in the Chula Vista community to
improve their reading and writing skilis. Rohr, incorporated u.;~s the Chula Vista Literacy
team for its Literacy efforts. Presently, we have both learners and tutors from Rohr and
both benefit from the Literacy team. The one-to-one attention given to participants is
invaluable. A Rohr employee, Tom Waller, who in less than a year went from third grade
reading level to junior high level, with the assistance of the Literacy Team. Tom stated this
about the Chula Vista Literacy Team, "My life started getting better when I joined the
"
program. .
As the coordinator of English as a Second Language and Literacy, I would hate to lose the
valuable resources of the Chula Vista Literacy Team. The Literacy team is more than
cooperative, meeting at Rohr several times to recruit learners and tutors. In addition,
indIVidual meetings have been made with union officials, tutors, and several employees to
spread the word about what is available. If the Chula Vista Literacy team is not given the
grant of $43,190, and is forced to close its doors, I do not know how Rohr can provide
Literacy services to the community of Chula Vista and the employees of Rohr.
If we want to remain competitive as a nation, then we must invest in our workers. We
cannot afford to have an illiterate work force that will not be able to keep up with the
technology. In California, there are more than 3.1 million adults who are functionally
illiterate. In San Diego County, literacy programs help more that 38,000 adults; however
that only reaches 11 % of the adults needing literacy services. How can we afford to lose
another program?
This problem is not unique to California, Michael Behar in an article in CIO, spoke about
a skills crisis, or "skills gap" that America is facing. Americans will need to improve their
abilities in order to meet the labor needs of the year 2000. Jobs that demand higher skill
levels will continue to grow faster than those requiring lesser skills. This is compounded
when over 60 percent of all high school seniors cannot write a basic letter seeking
employment.
Please hear my plea, Chula Vista cannot afford to loose the Literacy Team.
c~.i- ~
Cathy Dussik
Literacy and ESL Coordinator
J[)~..2, '-/
.
.
.
r-' .,
/)~ ?)/~
. cY~~JMfi~~z:&
.~ ?O ~ ~4~~ -M .~/l~
1!A'(J91~ ib 21t:. .~ '.#0AV-'~ W.M _R~
:.,c k&~ ~Cf;pz to ~ ?-J~ ~
c.f A"'- d~ j//~ t/~ 4/7 <'( ~e-/
~ fi1..an-u( AU.. [zt1. t>~.A~~ (J-UA vvtp -
1!1~~ ~-6 .AN;;;t! ft ~.-t~
.--<~ /.:, Av-V7\ 'i k ~~ ~ ~~ .
~-e~ d? .-tA-"~ A!~~~
/~~~d< ~
1600 ~>-(.tp ,;;!fJd ~~ r
~~. ~ '. .-..'r .;M!a-C/7
/C ., ~~ ~.A&
(', ..~fr-" 1/
;: .~7h ":';t~/. ..-(:, ~ iAI
OJ ~ ~~ . ~~ '~;Y.d1-<
to ~1fi'VL .~ ~ cY'~Y\I-;t~ ~ .~
~:&'~.,~j~~ ~:A ~.~::(~
An-<.-2..Z d'1'V'-'~-P~~'~ .~-r~'
cY~ ~ .o/~ d.D. ~~
.L~~.JUX-77Z ~ c.. ..e~ ~/v't::~ /YL8-T
~/~ ~ ~-e ~~
~;U~. (b/d,~ ,d..~.
cr.'~~ cY,.~flf, ,~.b/1~~::t0-f
4i ~~ . /) d ..J), /.
~~IJ27C/~
/ 2'/ ';)5'
iiiiiiii
-
-
-
~
(
~ 4) 199.2
(
~"- 'ffix. ~ ~ 1Ylun-k'<4J ~ -ik. ~~)
~~ ~ CJ$f'-.J~~~1-~~~
. , ~.hoL4) 7~~~-<<1J'rL(;;/.5~.'d~
o.-~~,~J%,J.a-m~ -"P-1lA~ ik~
~ A~ ~ h-c)=.J. ~i-.,-,~~. ~
. '*- ~::t -J:LJ: ~1'- ( J.~ kD- .Vn.. ~~ ~ r
. .~~ ().. O..:~ .~MJ ilcJ::tk. ~~2.\.j'
~~~) L~~~ J.si~)MJ. H ~ ~Ja.mfU!tt
~-b~~-h~~~I~)~~.J
. '-k ~ ~~~~!tJ: ~~-i4 ~~
.:JA.i ~ Q1l ~ ~ ~~~ .Qt~, ~.~
-(U)W J i J ~ k r:k ~~) d ~ko..~
~ a-.Jl ~ )MJ ~d~A> ~>ct PJ~.
. Jj ~1:...J. A.~ f^fY\fl- ~ -i\OW, ~~
:~~L~tn~~~~~rt. .
~ r;;;..)J.~ ~ J.k ;kl~r-~ -r1ltJ ~ ~
~ M1~Jrk,;CA$v.J:iJv...~~~
. ~ ~ -AJ.pd -flI.L. ;k ~ -'--'fV ()...~ o..v.J ~ ruo.J.,
.
~~&~~lfMvl~~
oW !f;144) fl'\L. ~ ~ Ju.to. nu...J. ~ .k. & I a..,.J k
~~:.u..J.p~rk~k~r"-~
!~~'~~r~t'M~~'-.
1~~4t)
: ~~
I
I
I ) orcZ?
iiiiii
-
--
. Apri l 28, 1992
City Counci l Chambers
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA.
Attn: Mayor and Members of the Ci ty Counci l
To whom it may concern,
.
I am writing this letter as a concerned citizen and
active proponent of the Chula Vista Literacy Team. I
am asking for your support to continue to fund the
Chula Vista Public Library's Literacy Team. I am a
current volunteer tutor within this program and
firmly believe that your support is paramount. This
program provides a variety of valuable resourc~s to
many adults in this community who are the parents of
the next generation. Without your support, programs
such as this are at risk of having to close their
doors.
Please help us by approving the Community Development
Block Grant which was recently applied for by Meg
Schofield, Literacy Program Coordinator. Thank you
in advance for your support and commi tment to a better
community and world.
Sincerely,
~t1.~
Louie A. Lopez
Rohr Inc. Employee
and Concerned Citizen
.
! (;r / .,.2 7
.
Mayor and City Council
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA.91910
Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council,
.
My name is Rosemae Dyer and I am A mother of three
children. I am currently in a reading program with the
Chula Vista Literacy Team. This program has not only
provided me with the reading skills necessary for me to
attain employment it has also given me the confidence to
help my children with there home work and read them
stories at bedtime.
Please vote in favor of our CDBG grant to keep our doors
open. I beleive that there are thousands like me who needs
the services of the Chula Vista Literacy Team.
Sincerely.
~D~
RoseMae Dyer
.
/ ~ /;2<6
Ii
Ii
Ii
I'
;iCl~ 2g,Jq9~
II I ~ ,
I, ~~
I' "
iw;-u~-~
" ------~
"~
i L______~. r?d._9 /9, ~
,
;:
.
I
~. i
"
-il~'J71-'Z ~ ~~~1ih i' &and,
. ~ 1-.~___________
-----+JtPi2pt~~ ~~-4u1 ~ AtLt
~~___~1~-{~~-,J ...._ ~_____~
__ :i1!;0-M-~1.~ ~~-1J!t
'~~~~ ,a~--7Ut:-7J1d11t-
---~__-__i:~.~a~JIa~~~~~~VJ~ k
_L~-1.~."~.___0;~"ff';[ At...J~'" - .-d.~-o-i~' "
- .. i~~~;eflK_#__LY~
~_~~~_~~__~~c___~~_ ._~MJk~,R "f,._
___~~ :;{k~j;,~-~~tkft~-4Y-&!LLa '.. .~U~
u~_~y~7fi'__0J~~r/fl~-~___ __.
-z;:!~~-;;4.
.
-7~' el;
.
-
l~o~.~. ~ ..~ M ~~ tL c.lv.k..
VlSk c;.tX~.. .
2~~~~~~~
-/"P'tf.~ ~ ~D~K.~ ~.IU- .
(/~~ . ~~/PAJ~ .
t2t<ef 5j2f~L ~ '.. fl~~
~::d~~.~ ~.Pr~
7X.,. ~d:i"" eM-<. ~ ~-d~..Q. I
7!:tf~~~ ~~~~Ji~~w>."
to.... nv.€.~ ~"W~ ~ ~
~'d..l",.~ ~ t.fi4 ~~, ~
Cu!e. ~"'~ c.....l)B& Q5~WlJ '
0dk~. .
y;~ ..tIe. ~ /o.."da..~~ df...~s~,,42
,
~~~5&#coo-z.<.-'!. ~ ('h~
z:ia, U/$I'..e ~...-t2 ~lD ~~fI!! it.
-
-/ kaJtk ~f.{,
--511t\ c...e.V" e. \ {] 1 "\
( \\.~ ~,,<r~~
/ 8', ;> 0
-e
ADn]/ ctJ)QQ2
I
UAlr Jvt,
+ ih,.. (Iify CO~ncl "
d Ae.mbt"r- (') -
.JV\AYD\ o..f\
t: fa C losp
t nsk ~()ll ntJ
I . rlyYI I.)r;-\-)~ 0 lOecQuse I.
pr~~c~, I.
. E>('(\{\ PolY] e I
k,,-\Y\ +h" 1,+ ~ eeds +h,~; help. L-fe ,
C '0tudent tf,af n t mil ILl"tt'Jr Tr\~.
o.m 'mpMo;, I, "th H,,,. kip ,0 . j (elf no ;"'prcvmenf.
QlY\ 1 ~t S(~ S Qn
~t"I\lf' +ri~ can n()r dose lh,..,-e an~
. \. ~t"o~r~~ h
.Th \~ \'~Cl~~,~ t'>n f PYY7. r/"
- L · - ~ A , f j, f; t'Y'e <1n,f reQ "'~
~::.::-r h . t-a '\'n~ e
etvtk yr;1 ~ ()r
fur:.
s-\nc..erp1y!
}t~n_~(\t1J71&0
----
"r7.:'-
/><:/] /
,
rr::_.c.,''---.'
'_llIK.;I'L1S_"
---- ..-----.........
e _ _ _ ,_ _..._ ..~ .__ ____.___n__nn__~ _~(}/j~f~_n -'
L~ ~'nb~u ._.~..--~n--J"&7 ~.1
:
t~_d-~rwa ~.fr-&--~.~ --
jJ~. ~.I ~.~ _n~ ._~.. "~'JL.
i~ 4. _~~,-J~_.fid. ...._---
;~ ~ ~. ~ W _Yl- .AuL... _u4~;>(/
A~,~.r.n_. ,
; ~~ Y~~.'.~Z'~-"~~'-~
~~~~..fiLe-.~~~ ..
, Jft~ ~ Mv ~ f -&- C!~6(i~.t-d ..
e. .ttxd -~ M- c:o~ -~ .~...~~ y
.a&..~. ~ 0t?U~ ~ ~~ .A~
Ht ~ ~
. :hc::;t. A..,;, ~
e
. ./_?:_~l~_~______ ___ ______
------ --~ -- --~~--------~-------- ---~-- - --
. T- ,
'. lCkaJL7lk.~~~"t~~C~J '
~ QJYY\ 0- ~ .J.tn ~ ~ 1J~ ~
~ -P/!.Oa.fUl.Im.. J Q../YI1 3 2 ~ 01.., CUl9-. ~
J ...J..U.OJ- {; d tf ~ tl k 0- ~- ~ c:vn.d.
~ o-nL ~ Muh. auk ~
~ .~~~". ~~.
_ ,~J ~ i.m- ~.~ I~ llioJrd: .to- ~
.J:.o- ~~ J. ~ Q/Yj ctm.d.
WYrJ: ~ CJJncl Q jQd . ~d .
~ cl.OJ\~O~, w.Lt1 JYYU.f ~ J ~ .
~ 'a.mA cln.J..d frv1t/l. nnlM1
~~ . ~)~~r;;;'~-'
· .~ii!UL~~~~
~ ht~ ~ .~.:Jki
Mjft"F't~~k~;;,tLk ~~~ ~
c.o.~~~ 'tit~
itL. ~ . ~~~.
~~.
.'~p
.
cv. q/Cf/O
/ 8"~ 3;
5-3~._
~~-~-~~~-----------
~ . ~~~- ~--~ :},-, ~~._--~
~_~~~.'Mw:fu~-
t92..'L_...Jl.flJ.~./'LJ~~------.....J-~------------- ------
~-~~~----------
I 1_ .
,},pCtUIM _.. r:. <l. ~~_..A..cJurQt~~
0JuJ-~~.. L--
~~_~~-~ I_
Cl4- a. Inb/? fl/rr'l+-sL_.fJ;J;._~1f-~-OAYJ_.k_Ao~-
~_~-<llZL.z_-'---4--n-~c-~------_:""'_------ ----
WM.-_..L_~_CfL_Y.!!ud+____WAua~-1uvuL.akut._-
~__kw~~1--~-~-~--::tD-#d-
ayj-_.a.ktd----l.:t'~..LJ:J1D1~~-.-i.U.a4-- ~_'L<~------
~~cmd~~--F~----
~~~,on "rn/Y>'? ..Ijb~_~_~~----
~ .000)o":J.l2"'ff0/Y7f),./~~(). . -
~ -j;" Yq ) .I.k//J} n Illd(f ~~j_wo:u1d~1J..J.
~ /"M', I
jJj#~ AD M./1 J,z .J-j, 0) (' h'll, In 1 U,'.IJ. +1\.. )
-!r/tM.n-":J"~/'1
~hA.~ ~t'\ I
~~m.~'I& ~C:~{\"Q. "\ J %<!- i
.
V~4 May04 Nada4 and CouncLi Membe4~:
I'd LLk~ to tell you about th~ 4~~utt~ 06 YOU4 y~4ty Ln-v~~t-
m~t Ln th~ Chuta v-uta LLte4acy tMm. A~ a votunt~e4 tut04, I WM
aM,(.gMd a man that coutd not 4~d th~ Ln~t4UCtLOM on a m~dLcLM
bottt~, ~t4~~t~~,(.gM, w04k-4Uatw Ln~t4uCtLoM, a nw~pape4, ~tc.
H~ had to d~p~d on othe4 p~opt~. A y~4 06 lli ~6604t~ and mLn~ ha~
chang~d tlli mal'll! LL6e. H~ not onty can 4~d aU th~ Lmp04tant Ltem~
Ln lli LL6~ , h~ now can 4~d 604 pt~a~u4~. H~ ha~ at~o t~4n~d to
w4Lt~, and wLth th~~ accompLL~hm~t~, h~ now ha6 a ~U6-~~t~em,
h~ n~ve4 thought po~~Lbt~. H~ -U OU4 ~ucc~~ ~t04Y, YOU4~ and OU4~.
Vou mu~t contLnu~ to 6und OU4 ~6604t~. w~ a4~ wLnnLng th~ wa4 agaLn~t
adu!t LilLte4acy.
Thank you,
Ma~ T4ag~4
Chuta V-Uta LLte4acy TMm
.
.
/y, ] b
i
-\' -
I
!
i
i
i
i _~C4-.. ~f'o<:.P~-v ~ ~ ~I
i J. ~ ~t-~ -pr ~'";:C-
i~,t:k ~ \r~ L-~ f~. .
\ i.-k ~~~~ l>---.-~-
i tt.--~)~~~--
!~~~~~~~
j~~' -.
j
I ~_~1'~-1 0~r:y'<-
I vr-
I
!
_ i .5 ~--t . I - .- - ...
I a I
-\~t ~I--_-__ m___:_.. ...
-J LJ/lAli ~L ...J__ I3Ap~J.-lAk....'::J.t<-.. ____d.._________
;
i
___ __._....._ _.._.,~_._._..__M.'._.._.~.___.__ -_._~.- ..-.- --,---------~.---~...-.-.- -- -.-.--.-.-.-.-----.- ..-.--
-~-
--....-.-.-.... - ....- -~...~ - --.-..- .__.~---_._.._.,--_...- '-"-"-""~-- -_.,- '-"-"-~- -~,---"-"-"--' ----.----.--.- ---.----.,... ~-- - .._,..---~
- _.._.._._--_.~_._-- ---- -' -- --.------..---------...- ,---..__.'...' ---_. ...-'.'-
,
I
-.+- -- ----. - -. .-------. ..-.-- --.----.----- .- -.---.- --.-----.-..-- -.-....-.
i
i
.-- .-
,- - ...--.-... .'" ------..----..--.--- -- - ,.-.-.--..--.--.....------
..-- .~_.....__._-, ..__._._-,-_.....~~._-_...-
/ z~ 37
---- --_.~_..--. .._~_.~--_._~_..-
_.0.- .__" ----...-.----- ,'_._-'~' .
..--- ._--_.__._~---. -- ----_.-
-I,> .
~j (\":':~~":-I~L<J/ ;.d<.C .'l~~ :~; J ~<j~
=~~l-~-'--~d_~t-:~.. ~'~~~""':AM~~:r~___ .
-_. 1~~~Ltph.._-~~.,-sJ__
o ~ . .
-- .~---_... . . .- . ~-._-
...__.~~~.
'0 -~-~h_......'~__
.. '9r T .. ~~---Q",--4-..l....~Q...~._-
-~~..4~'~-~~'-___
.--'-~~-==_~~.m~-;.))-,~;~-:;~..;.-=~~-~-~--=-
-. o..--~. . J n .p:, ~-n::..-....----k~_ -.-dfi-..~-
.__._ ~.o..O~=,J:_~.., .'.-... ~
_.,~..' ~.JYV~~____
---- ~-~-~~1-'~'~-~----
. '.l .'....:. . 0 . I) . ^" _ 0- _~_
~. - :----..J. c - :-~---J..~..L.~
_~..c...t...Q,...._ '~_
__~.r-~
---~ -
-.-----.w~~-~-J.~~-,-----
.. . ~.o~.~ ~.o......e...~..n.:....~ ._
~...~.-...Na. ..., .Cl.-(V~~..._
~~T'f?) ~~dl.J....._
- 0 ~ Q...-...;t \ Q' /J~
(~... _ ~ ...
-~r' - -1 .. -/-2- P7-'--
. ~-~.-'" ...-~~-~{-~-d~--~.
- .u...ll ~Qb .j\"g....:1~~.. :"O--~~~j;;..
-- .~. p u.' ~:t;r_~,~_~ -'c--
e
._ ....~__ ;~y, ._~m_?'./V~.K~._LI.,{__Y _.- .
..... ~_ ? ..4'._?",e;.~-.,.p:.~---L.!f:~.':",~/,,_ ....",,__d/-...
... ,~ ~ . ~~ __fl?/.re//....,"'~_tl____,,//., 4 _<$Ie"",...
. e'Y.1Il ~...;.. ?//~ ;d~,__ ______ .....
c...5':-~ee;f'-,9~v"..L _ _nO. . . _ .
~ ~~..",/ .
_ "..ry .lA' ..~ _. _H' __
-
--
/Y'39
.."~__. _____." '.. ___...__._ _(___ __ _..____w__.____..._ ._,._,.
!
~
..
..
--
,L /-:)___ d ~7~'" .,/ ~__~- ,/ ~ c'y ~-"v;/
: ..z;., w-..-;;.{b ,,{ /'V ,~ <h?/ INWI 6."'~// "e~llI~.se /
j..t- /- k,~/ ~- "Y ,p~"~A 4.,/ ~ &:-" ;;~
:'~"dr /.....-.- -Z~-- ,,(,..4'/ ~ ~e 4,.- ~-I' ,.;,.-
: IVf ~" .4" ~ ~~""";'/$~.~H. .7 ~ ?ksC'-
. ,P"'-.se 4n/ ud: ./~/-W. _ u _ _.
, J:_ 61 4.rt~./-- ,/ d: L~/:&~,..
. 8""'/ ~ "t,//"__ ks H?'~ 61 AN,.4/,/ ~#__ee
,M ~ /yt. ,23e...vse tI/ ~ ..;"'.s"'?ve.~;.. 4./ 1" 4...._.
. ,.~;ve/' "'..., ",.....~~ ,..../ #v,.....;.(~ .sL/f1 _/ .se#' ~_,,-
,~~"c~ ,zo",/.-/ 4"~_ .4~", ,,~ri1Ye/.?r.~f.-;7/:5c..
. ii1re. 66"''''' .,/ ~ ..rL'44/_ ;?ee""'/ ,,:( "St.-YV"/YO: ";,,
. "'~"Y7 ",(~ 8"/"/ ,w,v",v /,., Y"'?:, 4'.../ ~ +-..;6",
.~.,t'~ d~'? ,/ d t:!!4..,L,/ ~~. _
. -Z' 6..-e sL...y.s- ~- ../k ,? "'7""''''# -'/4'../1""'""'-1
,;/ ..r ,w'.rtS v,,_~ .4 ~4 tt'.,r~/f tlr ............/......./.lVn~
;tve///...4re f ~~e/Lse C~-=-r ~4~-....~.
: ~.... G1 ....;,r __..~ .,pC",""';.,/' ,./!'>:!..e -'7 .r......L..~ ~e/
; /~r'I"''''''''' (!1/,..y' .revr::.-? ",r,R~5.. _ .
..r "g~ ",~A,n~ /"1/ _ k y;~ "~~II'(N" tI;/
~ C::2:>3 0 <.fIr,,#?/ ?"f,. ~ ~4 X~
: L."~4'r /eQ......:5.. ;;;:r::/ ~/.r~ .;..../ t?4....r ".(;6,,-,?e.
. ~ lC"..n....-::","... /A 4. Prt?,....,..- <!!In/' drw c,--.."
."/k ~e: 7 ....~"',..'8""".... ~ .r_... .s'~<!!",:sf.
. -Z" _;/ ~ .!I&:::4 4-,?v~ L..,R,..,:' ,,,
~ ~ ~ ) 03n/IV/:#'" ./e _ /~?" ~.;n.s-~er /"" /"/es~".
/ g-- / 1p
---- ----
TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION FOR
CHUU::' V r STf.\
INM~R-CITY s.c.r YOUTH
ADVANCEM8~T EDUCATION PROGRAM
PRESENTED TO THE CITY CrnJ~~rL OF CHLLA VISTA
11iW 5, 1';><12
To-rAL_ FUNDS REQUESTEDS: $17,850.00
Duration of Project: August 1, 1992 - July 31, 1993
Institution: World Plan Executive Council
San Diego Transcerldental Meditation Program
Principal Investigator:
Clovro?r V. Ci~lvet _..........y;~_..~~:......_.......
San I)iegcl T.M. Center ChaIrman
J g/ L/ /
:,:1,,:):-..1
1"11lY' ,j" 1. (;>ci~ F'F(LSCI'lT iYI I UNTU CHl.,ILP, V I UTI\ CITY COUl'jC I L
MY NAME IU C~OVER CALVET
I 1\1'1 'IT,ll... CHI) HWli\I\1 UF' THE: ::31\1\1 I) I EUUTI\!)\',IUCE~,IDE\'>I'H\l...
MEDIATATIUN PRUURI\M
WE ARE A8KI~~ THE CITY OF CHUEA VISTA TO TAKE PART IN A VERY
PUl,j[:,F:FUL. "m'{E!',I< THE I"ICH",D" I\I\ID UCIENTII::'ICi)LLY PF':OVEN i)l~pnUACH
ru REHABILITI\TIUN FUR EOW INCOI"IE ~~LTI-ETHNIC YOUTH.
WE TEI\CH 1\ UI~~EE, EAUILY LEARNED I"IENTAL TECHNIQUE FOR
UIBES::3 REDUCTION RI\THER THI\N UTRESS I"IANAUEI"IENT.
IT IU NEITH8~ 1\ CULT, RELIGION, NUn F~ILUSOPY AND DOES NOT
REQUIRE ANY CHI\~~ES IN LIFE STYLE.
WE ARE PI\RT UF A WORLD-WIDE NUN-pnUFIT EDUCATIONAL
ORGI\NIZATIUN THI\T HI\S BEEN IN UPERATI~~ FUR OVEn 35 YEARS
UERVING APPROXII"IATELY 5 I"IILLION PEOPLE.
WE HAVE BEEN IN OPERATION IN SAN DIEGO C~JNTY, INCLUDINU
CHULA VISTA FOR OV8~ 30 OF THOSE YEARS AND HAVE
APPROXII"IATELY 15.000 PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN INUTRUCTED IN DiAT
TIME--20o OF WHOM PRESENTLY LIVE IN CHULA VISTA.
Dun ORGANIZATION ALUO HAS I\N INTEnNATIONAL SCHOOL AND
UNIVERISITY IN FAInFIELD, IOWA THAT IS FULLY ACCREDITED
THnOUGH THE DOCTcmATE LEVEE AND IS CONSISTANTLY IN THE TCW
3% OF THE NATION EVEn 'I YEAR.
I"IAHAnISHI INTERNATIONAL l.~IVEnSITY J~3T RECEIVED AN AWARD OF
56 I"IILLION D(~LARU FROI"I THE UNITED STATES GOVEnNI"IENT FOR
YUUTH EDUCic\T EII\I.
WE WUULD LIKE TO HAVE THE ~~AJRT~~ITY UF INVEEITING A PORTION
UF THAT 56 I"IILLION DULLI\RS INTU THE LOW I~~OI"lE YOU1~ THAT
LIVE IN CIlliLA VISTA-" TO BE USED FOR FINANCING THEIR CULLEGE
EDUCI\TI~~ THROUUH EITHEn WURK/STUDY A~OGRA~~ AND/on FULL
SCHOLARSHIPS TO THE UNIVEnSITY.
THE YUUTH WHU COI"IPLETE THE ONE YEAR nEHABILITATIUN PROGRAM
THAT WE I\RE PRUPOSING HERE TUDAY WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FUR THIS
~3F,[JNUUHSH I P.
ALTHO~3H CRII"IE, DRUG ABUSE AND GANG RELATED ACTIVITIES HI\S
ITS GENESIS IN THE I"IINDS OF HUMAN BEINGS, THE IMMEDIATE
CAUUES UF CHIMINALITY ARE SEVERAL.
C~ANGES IN TI~ STUCTURE OF LIFESTYLES AND CULTunAL PATTERNS
DU AFFECT LEVELS UF cnIMINALITY
IN. THE ABSENCE ~= pnODUCTIVE, LEGITIMATE AL~EnNATIVES, IT IS
EASY Fon UNEMPLOYED AND IDLE YOUTH TO CHOOSE UNURTHODOX
SHORTCUTS OR TU VENT THEIR FnUUTHATIDNS IN ILLEGAL WAYS.
HUWEVER, WHATEVER IS
HAS TU BE HELUGNIz~n
FUHCE DRIVI~~ PEOPLE
TH~ PRECIPITATING CAUSE OF CRI~E, IT
THAT STRESS IS THE PRINCIPAL MOTIVATING
"I"I"IIJ '''F''')C'' ["1:"'1 1"1 '1'I'lr:'1 I"I'Y
.. ~ f'j .1....) oJ'" .. '1 'i~ w
) g- -;';2--
STRESSFUL SITUATIONS HAVE BEEN A FACT OF EVERYDAY LIFE
CAUSING DISAPPOINT~~NT, FRUSTRATION, DEPRIVATION, PAIN AND
GRIEF.
SOME OF T~~SE SITUATIONS HAVE THE EFFECT OF A E~OW SIMMERING
FIRE; OTHERS HIT LIKE AN AVALANCHE.
8JME PEOPLE REACT TO THESE SITUATIO~~ F~ILOSOPHICALLY.
SOME FIND AN ESCAPE IN ALCOHOL
YET OTHERS HAVE N~COURSE TO HALLUCINIC DRUGS AND
TRANQUILIZERS.
IN srniE OTHERS T~~ REACTION MANIFEETS ITSELF IN DEVIANT
BEHAVIOUR, AGGRESSIONS AND CRIMINALITY.
WE HAVE A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF THIS IN THE EXPLOSIVE SITUATION
WHICH ERUPTED IN DIFFERENT AREASOIF CALIFORNIA INCLUDING SAN
DIEGO THIS PAST WEEK
THE LIMITATIONS CW MOST REHABILITATION, COUNCELING AND
THERAPY PRrn3RAMS IS THAT THEY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE
INDIVIDUAL SOLELY THROUGH OUTSIDE INFLUENCES--EMOTIONAL,
INTELLECTUAL, OR PHYSICAL.
WHAT IS NEEDED IN ADDITON IS AN APPROACH TO STRENGTHEN THE
YOUTH FROM WITHIN 8Y IMF~OVING THE FUNCTIONING OF THE
NERVOUS SYSTEM;
TO INCREASE PHYSICLOGICAL BALANCE SO THAT NATURALLY THE
YOUTH 883IN lD THINK IN A Mrn~E ORDERLY WAY,
NATURALLY THEIR MINDS CEASE TO BE SHROUDED BY NEGATIVITY
AND NATIJRALLY THEY ARE A8LE TO FULFILL THEIR DESIRES IN A
WAY l~AT SUPPORTS THEMSELVES AND THEIR SUN~OUNDINGS
TF~ METHOD WE ARE PROPOSING DEVELOPS THE8~ CHARACTERISTICS
IFffiESPECTIVE OF AN I~WIVIDUAL'S BACKGROUND, ATTITUDE OR
ABILITIES.
THIS IS WHY THE TIi PROGRAM HAS ATTAINED SUCH A HIGH DEGREE
OF SUCCESS IN THE PAST 35 YEARS.
THE PRrn3RAM WE AN~ OF~ERING 80TH COMF~IMENTS AND 8iHANCEE
THE E~=ECTIVE~~SS OF THE EXISTING REHABILITATION AND
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS. AND IS WITHIN ITSELF A CO~~LETE
~~OGRAM OFFERING A WELL ROUNDED AND crniPLETE AGENDA THAT
APPEALS TU YUUTH UF ALL AGES AND BACKGROUNDS.
WE-ARE THE LEADERS IN THE FIELD OF REHABILITATION FOR ALL
AGES AND HAVE PUBLISHED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH TO BACK EVERY
CLAIM THAT WE MAKE.
WE HAVE HAD SUCCESSFUL RE~ABILITATION PROJECTS IN V.A
HOSPITALS ACROSS THE CffiJNTRY FOR VIETNAM VETS
Ig-V3
IN CALIIFORNIA PENAL INSTITUTIONS SL~H AS FOLSOM, SAN
QUENTrn~ AND VACAVILLE AS WELL AS PENAL INSTITUTIONS ACROSS
II.IE ('mra..D.
WE HAVE AN ONGOING PROGRAM AT VACAVILU~ F~ESENTLY AND JUST
RECU~TLY COMPLETED A MAJOR PROJECT IN SENAGAL AFRICA WHICH
INVOLVED 11,000 INMATES AND 900 STAFF AND OFFICERS.
THE RESULT IN SENAGAL WAS THAT THREE PRISONS HAVE
F'cr':I''1{\I\IEI,rLLY CLDSED......" FUH {\ 1...1-\0< OF BU~, I ~H:~,S" {\ND " (TIHE:r':!3
ARE PRACTICALLY IDLE.
NU NEW. STAFF HAS BEU~ HIHED IN OVEH A YEAH AND THE
HECIDIVISM HATE HAS DHOPPED F~JM 70% DOWN TO 2%.
IN ALL OF OUH PHOJECTS THE OUTCU~~S HAVE BEEN CONSISTANTLY
POSITIVE AND HAVE INCHEASED IN E~FECTIVENESS THE LONGER THE
PHOJECTS CONTINUED.
STATE AND THAIT ANXIETY LEVELS HEDUCED SIGNIFICANTLY, NUMBER
OF DISCIPLINARY REPOHTS DECREASED, A STEADY DECLINE IN THE
U~~ OF DHW3S, ALCOHOE AND TOBACCO. ~~RE HAHMrn~IOUS
HELATIUNS AMUUNG INMATES AND BETWEEN INMATES AND PRISON
UF'F I CEr,!:i.
TCE CLGT OF PHUJErTS LIKE TCESE ARE VERY LOW AND THE COST
EFFU:TIVENESS E~~RMUUS.
ITS ABILITY TO PRODUCE RESULTS WITH REMAHKABLE RAPIDITY SAVE
THL!USANDS OF DOLLARS AND THE EFFECTIVENEES OF THE
REHABIEITATIrn~ SAVE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS EACH YEAR.
HUWEVER, THE MOST COST EFFECTIVE APPROACH TO REHABILITATION
13 I,IUI TO "CI....IJ!:ir~ THC B(\F<N I)[)LH:( ,\FTH,II'IE I.IDPSE H,\S E~,CM'EI) 'I "
BUT RATHER TO AVCRT THE DANGER BCFORE IT ARISES.
THCPCFDRC WE APE UFFU~ING A PRDGRAM GEARED TOWARD THE VEHY
AHEA OF SOCICTY THAT ARE THE MDST LIKELY CANDITATES FDR
CRIME---LDW IM:UME MULTI-CTHNIC YUUTH BETWEEN THE AGEE OF 10
!~I'ID ID.
!~LL. OFIIIC!3E YUlJTlI ,mE ",n In: UK" ,\ND f3DI1C H!WE ALREADY BEEI\I
INVOLVCD IN SOMC AREA OF CRIMC OR DRUG ABUSE.
CHULA VISTA IS A PRIME CANDIDATE FOR THIU YOUTH ~~OGRAM
THE POL.ICE DCPARTMCNT STATISTICS AL.D~E INDICATE THAT ABOUT
~:;O<) YLJI..IIH {\I:iI:S 11'<:~::': !mE 1<:1\I0Wf\J 'IU BE G!~NG r1ElvIBEI~S.
SOCIAL SERVICES DEPT RCPORTED THAT IT PRDCESSES DVER 800
GANG MEMBCRS PER YEAR.
BLITH PUBLIC AND ~~IVATE STRUL~UREE REFLECT THE ARTWDRK [)F
T~ESC YOUTH IN THE Fom1 DF GRAFITTI WHICH THE CDSG BUDGET IS
REQUC3TIM:i ALMD3T S44,0(~ TO ERADICATC
THIS 13 A CONTINUAL. DRAIN TO THE BUDGET FOR WHICH NO OTHER
ALTERNATIVE APPROACH HAS BEEN LWFERED TO DATE
/ 'j/ iLl
NEWSPAPERS AND TELEVISION REPORTS C~~TINUE TO MAKE US ALL
VERY UNCOMEORTABLY AWARE OF THE SITUATI~~S THAT ARE
HAPPENING ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS.
AS A RESULT. TE~ LAW ABIDING RESIDENTS OF C~JLA VISTA ARE
EXPERIENCING THE ~~DESIRABLE EFF8:TS.
Lrn3S AND DAMAGE TO PRIVATE PROn~RTY AND A SENSE OF FEAR D~~
TO GANG ACTIVITY, CRIME AND DRUG ABUSE.
THE PROGRAM WE ARE ASKING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TO TAKE
PART IN IS AN INVESTMENT-- NOT A DRAIN TO T~~ BUDGET. MONEY
SPENT IN THIS PROGRAM WOULD BE FOR TE~ REHABILITATION OF
DIFFE~ENT YOUTH EAL~ YEAR NOT TEU~ SAME YOUTH OVER AND OVER
AGAIN.
OUR TOTAL BUDGET FOR THIS PROGRAM IS 590,000. WE ARE
REOU83TING O~~Y A PORTION OF THAT PROPOSED
INVESTMENT---$17,850.
WE ARE ASKING YOU TO RECONSIDER THE CO~1ISSIONS'
RECOMMENDATION FOR OUR PROGRAM.
WE W~JLD LIKE TO HAVE l~E OPPORTUNITY OF DEM~~STRATING A
PROVEN METHLW TO CREATE A LASTING SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM
FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF REDUCIONG THE STRESS LESVEL IN T~~SE
YOUTH RATHER THAN TEACHING THEM HOW TO MANAGE IT-- AND AT
THE SAME TIME GIVE THEM A PLffiITIVE DIRECTI~~AL APPROACH IN
EDUCATIONAL AND CAREER OPPORTUNITIES THAT ARE NOT ONLY
AVAILABLE BUT ALSO ACCESSIBLE FOR LOW INCOME MINORITY YOUTH
THA~~ YOU
~/i5
TABLE 1
THE APPLICATION OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION PROGRAM TO SOCIAL SERVICES:
HOW MAHARISHI'S TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION CAN ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS
OF ALL ACTIVITIES OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES
This table shows how the Transcendental Mcditation program supports the success of all service activities
offered by the Social Serviccs
Service Goal of the Service What is Needed to Research Findings on
Achieve the Goal Transcendental Meditation*
Tutoring Services To improvc basic Significant improvcmcnt of . Improved performance of
educational skills, such as any educational skill children practicing TM on
mathematics and reading rcquires tlle receptivity, tests of matllematical
skills. attcntiveness, and inner calm ability, reading ability,.and
of the student. work study skills
. Improved intellectual
. performance in inner city
children
. Increased restful alertness
Individual/Group! To improve relationships, Significant improvement in . Increased emotional and
Family Therapy reducc symptoms of psycho- relationships, communication, social maturity
logical ill-healtll; to increase and problem-solving requires . Increased tolerance
emotional stability and allcviation of stress, increased . Decreased ncuroticism
harmonious behavior, im- physiological integration, . Decreased anxiety
prove problem-solving abili- improved understanding, in- . Increascd happiness
ty, improve communication creased ability to give. . Improved work relations
Expressive Arts To improve negative self- In order to succeed, these . Increased self-confidence
Therapy image; improve functioning activities must increase sclf- . Increased naturalness and
at home, school, and in tlle confidence, happiness, spontaneity
community through creative integration betwcen mind and . Greater emotional stability
exprcssions. heart, and ability to communi- . Increased creativity
cate and work in harmony . Decreased tension
witllolllers. . Greater empalllY
. Increased trust
Self-Esteem To improve self-image and Lasting improvements in self- . Enhanced self-esteem and
Building self-actualization, and there- estecm and self-actualization self-actualization
by improve social adjust- require greater use of one's . Broader comprehension:
ment, school achievement, latent abilities so Illat one can improved academic
and behavior. achieve one's desircs and en- performance
joy more success in action. . Decreased hostility
. Greater self-control
Educational To im prove parents' under- TIle effect of developing con- . Increased ability to
Support ! standing of thcir children's sciousness in parents is re- cooperate with .olllers
School Advocacy special educational needs, duction of stress, broader . Increased sensitivity to the
provide home instruction and comprehension, greater sensi- feelings of others
tutoring, and meeting WiUl tivity to Ille child's needs, . Greater scnse of social
teachers to improve Ille capacity to give more to the responsibility
likclihood of Ille student's ac- child on IlIC basis of more in- . Increased persistence; broader
adcmie success. ner happiness. comprehension
Jif/L/ ?
TABLE 1 (continued)
THE APPLICATION OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION PROGRAM TO SOCIAL SERVICES:
HOW MAHARISHI'S TRANSCENDENTAL MEDlT A nON CAN ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS
OF ALL ACTIVITIES OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES
Service Goal of the Service What is Needed to Research Findings on
Achieve the Goal Transcendental Meditation
.
Crisis Intervention To stabilize the family and A meUlOd to systematically . Increased energy and
Services help Ulem resolve a crises reduce stress and prevent its endurance
when Uley are under ex- accumulation by . Prevention of psychiatric
treme stress. increasing physiological illness
stability is Ule long-term so- . Faster recovery from stress
lution to crisis situations. . Decreased anxiety
Parent Support To enable parents to handle Daily opportunity for deep . Decreased tension
stress in the home more ef- rest and development of . Maintenance of a relaxed
fectively and provide for creative intelligence style of physiological
parents' emotional nccds. eliminatcs stress and pro- functioning
vides inncr stability, cven- . Decreased dcpression
ncss, fulfillmcnt, and broad . Increased vigor
comprehension, so iliat . Enhanced inner well-being
parcnts bctter understand and . Broadcr comprehension,
guide Uleir children. improved ability to focus
Parenting Skills To provide a nurturing and Developmcnt of behavioral . Dccreased aggressiveness
Development structured home environ- and cognitive flcxibility and . Dccreased impulsiveness
Instruction ment UJat assists in emotional stability is . Decreascd irri tability
improving Ule YOUUI'S esscntial for adults to . Increased sensitivity to ilie
behavior, self-estcem, and improve parenting skills. feelings of oiliers
school performancc. . Increased ability to be
objective and fair-minded
Job Skills To devclop job readiness Readincss to work and to . Increased employment
Development and skills and vocational skills, lcam specific job skills have . Increased intelllgence
Job Placement and to find employment Ulcir basis inthc qualities of . Increased tolerance
for youth intclligcncc, crcativity, flexi- . Improved job performance
bility, tolerance, and resis- . Improved job satisfaction
tancc to stress. . Greatcr initiative
Educational To assess cognitivc, emo- Youili who learn ilie Tran- . Decreased dropout rate
Assessment! tional, and behavioral scendental Meditation pro- from school among
Diagnostic strengilis and wcakncsses gram will be experiencing economically dcprived
Services relevant to educational significant cognitive, emo- adoleseents
placement; to detcrmine tional, and behavioral dcvel- . Decreased examination
psychiatric, physical! opment, and ilieir vocational anxiety
neurological, vocational, and educational aspirations . Increased academic
- and psychological! will be higher; ilius it will be performance
neuropsychological status wise to reassess ilieir grow- . Improved mental health
ing strcngilis after six . Increased productivity
months to one year TM
practice.
) ~/L-/7
EXPERIENCES FROM PRISONERS IN V ACA VlLLE PRISON
V ACA VlLLE, CALIFORNIA
'IRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION PRISON REHABIIlTATION
PROGRAM
JUNE-SEPTEMBER, 1991
The benefits of the TM program are both immediate and cumulative.
Unlike other systems of meditation or self-development, one does
not have to wait for a long. time to notice appreciable results. The
following are a selection of experiences given in writing by inmates
in Vacaville Prison only a few days after their instruction in the
Transcendental Meditation program. These experiences all seem to
have the following features, in common:
I) Deep relaxation, freedom from stress and anxiety
2) Improved ability to cope with the prison environment
3) A more positive outlook; improved morale
4) Greater energy in work and activity
5) Improved relationships with fellow inmates and family
members
6) Improved sleep.
"I have exceeded all my previous expectations in my vocational
program, and am advancing at an extremely rapid pace. I have more
patience with family members, therefore our relationships are
improving." - Robert B. Andrews, 33
"I am a lot more active in work and recreation.
stress build up through the day. I feel rested
sessions." - John W. Jasmer, 34
I have very little
after meditation
"I've been more open with my feelings with others. My activities all
day have been full of more energy. And my day-to-day work has
shown much improvement." - George Bogdowovich, 37
"I feel more clear, more focused. When at work I am able to
concentrate completely on what I'm doing (something usually hard
for me to do.) When surprises (unexpected happenings) occur when
dealing with people, I feel more calm and rational when dealing with
them." - Robert Graham, 21
) 8'/~ LI[5
"During TM a deep relaxation and calmness is felt, quietness,
lightness, peacefulness, transcendence. It's a deeper feeling, and a
freedom from limited mind focus into a more expanded awareness.
There is less stress and tension in activity and more relaxation and
clearer thinking, more creativity." - Brian Babinski, 34
"I find a peace and quiet now that was lacking in my life before TM.
It's nice to relax while awake. I really like to be able to rid myself
of all the conflicting thoughts of the day." - Dale Pollock, 36
"I feel very conscious, more active in communicating with all
people. Job tasks are easier and more orderly. And my attitude
towards people is causing more warmth and sincereness from other
people, and people are acknowledging a brightness about myself." -
Victor Rios, 38 .
"I found peace and no need to take medication, and I am able to read
better. During TM I feel like I am out of prison and feel better about
the total out-look of life. A deep peace of mind comes over me and
it makes my life feel at peace." - David Sonny Rodrigues, 35
"I have experienced a deep inner vision, full of beauty and peace.
Sometimes it would take more time than others to become relaxed,
but afterwards I felt total comfort while meditating and
experiencing the TM technique. It's great!" - Vincent P. Terry, 25
"I feel quiet, peacefulness, a little calmer. I like the meditations. I
get a lot done at work - and I get good workouts. I'm calmer and I
think about things a little differently. TM has and is helping me to
help myself." - M. J. Salinas, 36
"I started lifting weights in April and I wasn't very strong. Nor did I
have the motivation to stay for 2-3 hours. But since my meditation
period I've become more motivated, and it seems I get a better
exercise after the end of my 3-hour period. My memory has gotten
sharper, too. I sleep better now, without tossing and turning through
the night as before TM!" - Andre P. Church, 38
"The TM practice I believe to have been very beneficial. I have been
more relaxed. The meditations have been most important to me. The
days and nights are more pleasant. I don't focus so much on being in
prison. My thoughts are clearer. I am not angry so much anymore. I
wish I would have discovered this years ago." - Waldo Mockey, 43
/ F /1-/;
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-YOUTH AND ADULT CORRECTIONS AGENCY
PETE WILSON, Govemo,
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY
VACAYllLE, CA 95687.2000
(707) 448.6841
@"'."
. :.~11:.'
~ -,~f.
,,;?;
May 20, 1991
Faroukh Anklesaria
. Director, Rehabilitation Programs
Maharishi Consultants International
MIU Box 1121
Fairfield, Iowa 52556
Dear Mr. Anklesaria:
I have reviewed the results of your recent rehabilitation
programs in other countries and am favorably impressed with the
reported results. The research in California and in
Massachusetts on the reduction of recidivism is especially
encouraging. We are facing a sky-rocketing prison population in
California and should do something to relieve the pressures of
prison overcrowding without compromising the safety of our
communities.
I would like to see the Transcendental Meditation program
institutionalized within specific units of Vacaville state Prison
and am working with stuart Moody, your Northern California
Director, giving him what support I can in this year of severe
budget restrictions. While a research project on a200-man
dormitory is being developed for our South Facility, I have an
interest in beginning a proposed study this summer, using TM and
related therapies for alleviating the conditions among our
burgeoning population of HIV-infected inmates in our Main
Facility.
Thank you for your interest and your inspiration to test a
creative approach, which, hopefully, may improve prison health
care and rehabilitation.
sincerely,
NNETH S. SHEP
EDICAL DIRECTOR
.,
>~jp
D, M.D., F.A.A.P.
) 21/5['7
/
DALLAS/fORT WORT" SC"OOL Of LAW
2535 Bast Grauwyler Road
Irving. Thxas 75061
TeL. (214) 579-1071
(800) 733-9529
October 30, 1991
The Honorable Farouk Anklesaria
Director of Rehabilitation Programs
Maharishi Consultants International
1700 U~~versity Court
Fairfi~d, Iowa 52556
Dear Mr. Anklesaria:
I understand that your organization is helping to make available
Maharishi's Rehabilitation Program in prisons throughout the united
States and Canada.
I am familiar with Maharishi's Rehabilitation Program and its
~ajor compoIlent, the technique of Transcendental Meditation.
I have been following the literature on the effects of
Tranocendental Meditation on the individual and the environment
for over 20 years. There is D. la~ge body of literature recounting
the impact of M<lharishi's TLanscendental Meditation Program in the
field of criminal justice, both within and without correctional
institutions. See for example, George Ellis, INSIDE FOLSOM.
I have also attended over the years a number of Rehabilitation
Conferences where various :r;ehabilitation techniques and programs
have been discussed by professionals from all fields.
I know of no technique or program more effective than that
which Maharishi offers. These procedures not only have a
beneficial effect upon the individual, but also a well
documented n~derly effpct upon the environment.
Maharishi's Rehabilitation Program has the demonstrated
ability to produce better prisoners, better prison staff, and
better prisons. It has the potential to empty the prisons and
through the neutralization of stress - the very source of crime -
to produce a crime free society.
I hope that all those professionals you have contacted will be able
to adopt this far reaching program for their institutions.
Yours
sinc:~y: ^ ~ C3~
Shir :e~ ~:- ;;:bd
Professor of Law
) 8>5/
&tatr of ~llfornll
irpartmrnt' of Jwrtirr
~olJll ~. ~lln de ~llmp
,Mtornry ~rnrrul
3580Wilshirl Boult~\lard, t;,;OUr!
Lo~ An~le\ 9)Ol(
12131736230'
-2032
.'
January 21, 1983 ,
Catherine R. Bleick,
Institute for Social
2716 Derby Street
Berkeley, California
Dear Cathy,
Thank you for sending me copies of your latest
research regarding the high number of inmates continuing
TM practice years after receiving instruction.
Ph.D.
Rehabilitation
94705
Based on my observation of these inmates during
my time on the Board of Prison Terms and within the'Adult
Corrections Agency it appears evident they receive many
positive benefits from TM. Past surveys and supportive \,
comments from Wardens/Superintendents' such as Paul Morris
of Folsom certainly support such findings.
With overcrowding and growing tensions among
inmates and staff there~'seems to be a greater need than
ever for the, TM program. :1 addressed this fact'to over
300 administrators in my Toronto ACA presentation and
received a great deal of support from participants. There
were many supportive, testimonials, such as those received
from the State of Vermont, and no disagreements.
Best wishes in all your future endeavors.
Very truly yours,
~-'I <<-'<-~ f:4, '6-t"--
RUdY De Leon
Special Assistant to the
Attorney General
leg
)(j<~;2
FAMILY STRESS CENTER
571 Third Avenue' Chula Vista, CA 92010' (619) 691-1331
Chula Vista CDBG Hearing
May 5, 1992
These CHULA.. VISTA residents are CURRENTLY on the wai ting list at
the YMCA Family Stress Center:
2 year old boy--victim of physical abuse by father
2 year old boy molested by mother's boyfriend
3 year old girl molested by a neighbor
3 1/2 year old boy with history of possible sex. abuse
5 year old girl physically abused by mother
5 year old girl molested by aunt
6 year old boy at high risk for physical abuse
7 year old boy molested by father
7 year old boy with sexualized behaviors at school
7 year old boy with molest history
7 year old girl with nightmares every night
7 year old girl with history of emotional abuse
9 year old girl molested age 2 by uncle, age 9 by neighbor
9 year old boy, foster child, molested in first foster home
10 year old boy molested age 5 by a cousin
10 year old boy about to be expelled--verbally abusive
11 year old girl at risk for physical abuse by mother
11 year old boy with molest history
11 year old boy in foster care--history of molest
11 year old girl molested by mother's boyfriend
11 year old girl molested by stepfather
11 year old girl--history of attempted molest by uncle
(over)
/Y/~3
A Child Abuse and Neglect Project of the San Diego County YMCA Human Development Center
12 year old boy with molest history
12 year old boy physically abused by mother
14 year old girl with molest history
14 year old pregnant girl physically abused by father
15 year old boy (reason for referral not clear)
18 year old female molested at ages 11, 14, 16
20 year old mother of a 2 y.o. at risk for abuse
22 year old mother of 3 children under 3--phys. abuse
32 year old father of 3 small children
33 year old mother of 3--multiple problems
34 year old mother with child in protective custody
34 year old mother of 2--at risk for physical abuse
35 year old mother of molested dau. needs help for herself
37 year old mother with son in foster home--physical abuse
39 year old father with panic attacks related to sex abuse
43 year old stepfather who molested stepdaughter
48 year old father of 4--reason for referral not clear
Parents of 1 year old and 4 year old--domestic violence
Grandparents--they molested their children who in turn
molested their children. The last two generations are
already in treatment at Family stress Center.
/S'''5L/
-:;-';i~,"'. _; _""":''7..'~-~~--~--
- ~'~" ~-'-'- "~-'r-'-' '. . -' ,
-. .,...~ -'- ..--",,, - ",~~.",~ - --'_._~~-..-
State of California
Deparl8ent of Rehabilitation
M e m 0 ran dum
To
Ferd Shaw, Deputy Director
Field Operations Division
Oate
January 18, 1990
file no.:
f ....
,
Warren Hayes V
Cooperative Program Specialist
Subject: COST EFFECTIVENESS OF SERVING THE SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL
The attached description of the "Rise and Shine" Car Wash from the
Stockton District quantifies taxpayer savings from reduced psychiatric
hospitalizations as a result of providing supported employment servic-
es. The following summarizes significant findings:
. $2,805 per client per year was saved in reduced in-patient
psychiatric hospitalizations.
o 93% reduction in in-patient bed usage.
. 68% reduction in board and care facility usage.
. Adding the above cost benefits reduces the payback period from
2.24 years to 1.2 years.
Successfully serving this population via a supported employment model
has significantly more taxpayer benefit than is currently being calcu-
lated. Plans are underway to replicate this study with Crossroads and
Sacramento County Mental Health.
cc: June Warren
/?-55'
~ ~_____ ____._.,.. _'< .. --.......--,_~,...---...-. ~, ..'""--'" -.C....... -." ,......,.......' ...-f._.."..'l"....~.............~~.~n,~~'~__ ~ "'" _'" _ .~
- 4 ~
~----.-~_..-----..--
THE COST EFFECTIVENESS OF EMPLOYMENT
SERVICES FOR THE SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL
by: Warren Hayes
Cooperative Program Specialist
Department of Rehabilitation
Providing employment services for the severely mentally ill has
traditionally been a low priority for both the Department of
Rehabilitation and the Department of Mental Health. Although A.B.
2541 (Bronzon Bill - 1986) mandates that the two agencies collabo-
rate to provide a full spectrum of employment services for this
population, the bill provided no new funds. Consequently services
have been relegated to the two agencies' existing priorities. The
Department of Rehabilitation spends more with less success with
this population; thus higher potential disability groups tend to
receive more attention. The Department of Mental Health has
determined more critical services, such as emergency crisis care,
to receive funding support. Both agencies recognize the value of
providing employment services to this population. However, the
issue remains as to the best justification to increase funding.
This paper will outline a cost effectiveness pilot study that
suggests providing employment services to the severely mentally
ill nearly doubles savings to the taxpayer as compared to the
generally disabled person. .
The Department of Rehabilitation provides a yearly cost-benefit
analysis that enables a comparison of rehabilitation costs versus
return to the taxpayer in the form of benefits savings and in-
creased tax revenue (Table 1). A pay-back period is then deter-
mined. This pay-back period represents how long it takes a dis-
abled individual to "pay back" in decreased public benefits and
increased tax revenue the amount of money the Department of Reha-
bilitation spends to vocationally rehabilitate an individual.
Table 1 compares these costs versus benefits for the average
disabled client versus the severely mentally ill client. As might
be expected, rehabilitation costs for the severely mentally ill
client are significantly higher, with a resulting longer pay-back
period. However, the severely mentally ill incur inpatient psy-
chiatric hospitalization costs that have not been included by the
Department of Rehabilitation in their cost-benefit analyses. This
has been because no data has been available to quantify this
expense. However, within the last two years county mental health
departments have brought on line computer data systems that can
now track the costs of psychiatric services over time.
Community Re-entry Program and San Joaquin Mental Health have
recently completed a pilot study of 28 severely mentally ill cli-
ents. (See attachment #l for a description of the program.)
/ ?<5' t
_-..,..................,..".,.~_~_....____--..~.~...".,..__..,,___~.~~ _. "-f _. _-....--;:..-,.._~--- -,-.-,.--.---' ~. - -...-~. 'T_....~ - ~-_.----.
~ ~ . ~.
-2-
These 28 individuals were tracked over time on San Joaquin Coun-
ty's computer to determine in-patient psychiatric hospitalization
costs before employment services, and again after clients went to
work. Table 2 shows that an average of $2,805 per client per year
was saved. In addition there was a 93\ reduction in in-patient
bed usage, and a 68\ reduction in board and care facility usage.
If this cost savings to County Mental Health is added to the
traditional savings computed by the Department of Rehabilitation,
the pay-back period for serving the severely mentally ill drops
from 2.24 years to 1.2 years.
This pilot study shows an impressive cost savings for a small
number of clients being successfully served by one program.
Conclusions of a state-wide or nation-wide nature are obviously
premature. However, the technology now exists to replicate this
study wherever seriously mentally ill individuals are put to work
and provided professional supportive services to stay employed.
State-wide there are several mental. health vocational programs
that now have the capability to access their county mental health
database in order to quantify the impact of their services.
Mental health has traditionally argued for funding on the basis of
client need and/or service effectiveness. Unfortunately, funding
priorities have favored other areas such as criminal justice and
education. Even funding for the disabled have favored other
groups, such as the blind and developmentally disabled. However,
mental health now has a service technology, supported employment,
and a database technology that can show dramatic savings to the
taxpayer. It is now possible to show that supported employment
services to the severely mentally ill is worthy of much more
extensive funding than currently exists.
/7'5'7
---._.._.,..--_,.-".___,=----..---.....~..".--::........_1'~.................__,._....,____~~__!---,,-.--_- - --:~''''~'''.~-''''--'--- -l-.....
.
-3-
CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION
TABLE 1
Cost-Benefits for Rehabilitating Clients
Fiscal Year 1988
All
Clients
Severely
Mentally III
$6,824*
Average cost per rehabilitation....$5,824
Savings
In welfare costs
In Medi-Cal costs
In Social Security Benefits
Revenue
Increase Federal income tax
Increased state income tax
Increased state sales tax
Increased Social Security tax
Average economic benefits per rehabilitation
$2,773
$3,052*
Pay-back period in years............ 2.10
2.24*
*estimate
jY/5%
''''1,.....-''.... "'" _1 .~.... ,~
- .....
~. .. ~~,~ ___. ,,_'__1PJ!Il! Ii 8.U-"7"""'''
-' . ..--.
_,__.._.,--, .. ....~~~1"~-..-'a>
.
-4-
Attachment 1
COMMUNITY RE-ENTRY PROGRAM - VOCATIONAL
REHABILITATION "RISE AND SHINE INDUSTRIES"
The Community Re-Entry Program's Rise and Shine Industries is
designed to provide clients of the San Joaquin County Mental
Health System with employment opportunities to gain employment
experience and develop work histories. Rise and Shine places
clients at various sites within the community where they receive
training and supervision. An example of this work environment is
the local Auto Center where clients wash between 550-750 vehicles
each day for four auto dealerships. A crew of 18 employees, all
referred to the Auto Center by County Mental Health, make up this
dispersed work crew.
Clients work at three levels in the Auto Center, each level paying
minimum wage or better. Most_clients attend to washing and drying
vehicles. At the second level, clients are responsible for main-
taining machines and equipment. Finally, two clients have ad-
vanced to positions of leadership, Consumer Enclave Supervisor,
which involves supervising 6-8 other employees to ensure that
vehicles from auto dealerships are washed on a daily basis.
Rise and Shine Industries uses a "Job Club" model for client
entry, integration, and maintenance during employment. This
program helps preserve the client's mental, employment, and social
stability. It facilitates feedback on clients' behavior, work
quality, and attendance, and also provides recreational activities
and other incentives to reward and encourage good work.
NOTES OF IMPORTANCE
.
All client employees have major mental illness with chronic
diagnosis.
28 of these employees have worked 6 months or more.
Each employee works between 24 - 30 hours per week.
Each employee earns minimum wage or more.
The average employee earns between $400 - $500 per month.
.
.
.
.
reprinted from Supported Employment News, Vol. 3, '3, Oct-Nov 89
/3/'~1
---;._. .:..-..........~ ~1'WilIt~.~.~_,.~~ _ __..-ut-<;.._~ ...----
.....W'W _ T ___
-= __..-"-"",,~-..,-~:;,,..,...~~ ~.-F~
r~~~~~.
-
.
-5-
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH
COMMUNITY RE-ENTRY PROGRAM
Table 2
In-patient Psychiatric Hospitalization Costs
December 1987 through May 1989
For 28 clients served by the Community
Re-entry Program, Stockton, CA
6 months prior Employment
to employment to 6 months 6 months later
In-patient Placement $39,732 $10,972 $2,612
Crisis visitation 8,467 3,468 786
TOTAL 48,199 14,440 3,398
Average cost per client 1,721 516 121
Average savings per client per year.........................$2,80S
Clients Living Situation
Board and Care Facility
19
11
6
wi th Family
Independently
Total Clients
2
2
15
28
2
20
28
7
28
o
93% reduction in in-patient bed usage
68% reduction in board and care facility usage
o
/~/!ro
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /1
Meeting Date 5/5/92
SUBMITTED BY:
Report: Waiver of Fees in Excess of $1,000 for Conditional Use Permit
PCC-92-12
Director of Planning /1lIt
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
City Managet9r
(4/5tbs Vote: Yes_No.lO
(Council Referral #2566)
On March 3, 1992, the City Council considered a letter from Mr. Fernando Durazo dated
January 21, 1992, requesting that fees in excess of the original $1,000.00 deposit for processing
a conditional use permit for a used car sales facility at 1506 Broadway be waived (see attached
letter). The Council referred the matter to staff for a report and recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the report and deny the request.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
On September 23, 1991, Mr. Durazo filed an application for a conditional use permit to locate ~
a used car sales facility within an existing commercial center at 1506 Broadway. The application ~t"~~
included a "Development Permit Processing Agreement" signed by the applicant (see attached).~O~
This agreement sets forth the conditions and circumstances under which the applicant agrees to
pay for the costs incurred by the City in processing the application. By signing the agreement,
Mr. Durazo acknowledged his understanding of said obligation.
With respect to the Conditional Use Permit, on November 6, 1991, the Montgomery Planning
Committee by a vote of 3-2-2 failed to adopt a recommendation on the application. The matter
was then considered by the Planning Commission on December 4, 1991. The Planning
Commission denied the request unanimously by a vote of 6 to O.
On December 5, 1991, a letter was sent to Mr. Durazo indicating the Planning Commission's
action and his right to appeal that decision to the City Council. The letter also indicated that
the amount due on processing the application was $1,874.02 and that an additional $1,000
deposit would be required in order to process the appeal. Mr. Durazo did not file an appeal.
\ l\- \
Page 2, Item 11-
Meeting Date 5/5/92
Mr. Durazo's letter states that during a subsequent contact with the Planning Department on
January 9, 1992, he was informed the amount due was $2,132.62 rather than the amount stated
in the Department's letter. The difference is due to the fact that there is usually a substantial
delay before all of the staff hours logged against a project show up in the project accounting
system.
The City Council has an adopted policy (#267-05) by which non-profit organizations may be
granted a waiver of fees when the Council determines that the value of the public service
performed merits the waiver. Because the business endeavor requested by Mr. Durazo is I)ot
a nonprofit organization, the Council policy for waiver of fees does not apply, and there is no
other apparent justification for a waiver.
The staff resources represented by the fees were used in processing Mr. Durazo's application,
and he was fully aware of his obligation to pay for those costs as evidenced by his signature on
the Development Permit Processing Agreement.
It should be noted that City staff will be implementing a major upgrade of the City's project
accounting system in July. This upgrade will improve the City's ability to provide more timely
billing information to project applicants. It is also staff's intent to ensure that future billing
letters clearly state that additional charges may be forthcoming.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
(PCC92-12.AI13)
vt- :t.
EXCERPT FROM MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
OF NOVEMBER 6. 1991
PUBLIC BEARING:
i~~;;~O~~le~~:b~~~i; PCC-92-12
_______ __ _ _______ _ ~;;d car sales facilitv at 1506 Broadwav
Associate Planner Barbara Reid introduced Planning Technician Ann
Pedder who would make the presentation. Ms. Pedder advised the
committee that the details of this Conditional Use Permit
application were contained in the staff report which had been
mailed to them; she stated that the Planning Department
recommendation was for denial of the application. Ms. pedder
stated that used car lots were proliferating in the Montgomery
area, and that review of the approved business licenses for small
used car lots within a three-quarter mile radius of the subject
site revealed that thirteen such businesses currently existed.
with regard to the application before the committee, Ms. Pedder
-noted that other uses existed on the site, and staff felt that the
proposed use would severely impact the rest of the site. Further,
\ti..:;
MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE
-2-
NOVEMBER 6. 1991
it was felt that this type of use was proliferating, created
problems, and should not be encouraged. Slides of the site
provided by the applicant were shown to the committee. Ms. Pedder
indicated the area of the parking lot utilized by the used car lot,
as well as the adjacent uses on the site. She noted that parking
was a problem, landscaping was minimal, and the space between the
residential use and the area for the used cars was limited. Also,
the landscaped setback area required by the Montgomery Specific
Plan was not addressed by this application.
committee Questions
Member McFarlin asked for clarification of the front setback area;
Associate Planner Frank J. Herrera-A advised that a 15-foot
landscape buffer in the front yard setback was required by the
Montgomery Specific Plan; further, he stated that parking was not
permitted within this area. McFarlin asked why there had not been
an environmental review? Associate Planner Barbara Reid stated
that the Environmental coordinator had determined that this project
was a Class 1 exemption, due to the size of the project.
Member Berlanga inquired as to the business history of the site.
Ms. pedder informed the committee that the previous business
license for the space currently occupied by the applicant was a
cabinet shop; she added that the space at the end of the building
was occupied by an auto electric business, which is a permitted use
in this zone. Member Castro asked what the duration of a permit
would be, if granted. Mr. Herrera-A stated that time limits could
be stated as a condition of approval for the Conditional Use
permit. Castro asked how long Mr. Durazo's lease was? Mr. Durazo
responded that he had a month-to-month agreement. Mr. Castro
questioned whether traffic would substantially increase as a result
of this use. He asked if the front setback requirement could be
eliminated? Mr. Herrera-A responded that site issues, such as the
other businesses on the site, would constrain this; however, this
requirement would have to be addressed at some point, if not by Mr.
Durazo then perhaps by the owner of the property.
Member Scheuer asked if the applicant had had the opportunity to
review staff's report? Ms. pedder responded that numerous meetings
had taken place between the applicant and staff, but that she did
not know if a report had been mailed to him. Mr. Herrera-A added
that the report was public record, and that the applicant was able
to review the report at the Planning Department at any time he
chose. Scheuer asked if all of the issues in the report had been
discussed with the applicant? Mr. Herrera-A responded that they
had been. Scheuer advised that the photographs depicted were not
representative, and he found this to be unfair; further, the report
itself indicated that the proposed use was totally incompatible
with the site. However, numerous other auto uses existed in the
vicini ty , many of which were less attractive than this site;
\Oc -1\
MONTGOMERY PLANNXNG COKKXTTEE
-3-
NOVEMBER &. 1991
included among these uses was large automotive center. Therefore,
he found the applicant's proposal to be compatible with the
surrounding area. Scheuer stated that he found the report to be
biased, citing the negative traffic impacts stated without benefit
of a traffic report as an example. Mr. Herrera-A advised that city
departments make comments, as they see necessary, in response to
requests from the Planning Department for applications such as this
one. Mr. Herrera-A further advised members that direction given to
staff came from the Montgomery Specific Plan, with regard to
certain marginal uses. He stated that this was a marginal use, and
that amenities were expected from projects such as these; in this
case, it was unlikely that Mr. Durazo had the ability to provide
these amenities, and the property owner was not willing to provide
them at this time.
Ms. pedder advised Mr. Scheuer that the slides had been provided by
the applicant, and were his interpretation of what would provide an
accurate view of the site rather than staff's. She added that the
automotive center mentioned had been designed with automotive uses
in mind, and that this site had not been so designed. Ms. Pedder
stated that she had assessed the site and had made an
interpretation of the site plan regarding probable impacts should
this use be permitted.
Ms. Reid stated that the conditional Use permit was a discretionary
permit, and that as such, special consideration was given to the
proper location of the subject use relevant to adjacent uses, such
as the abutting residential. She noted that as this was not an
outright permitted use, the applicant was expected to come forth
with a plan that would improve the site and community with elements
such as landscaping and proper setbacks; staff did not feel that
this plan provided these things.
Mr. Scheuer stated that as certain studies had not been done, he
was not comfortable with many of the findings. Mr. Herrera-A
advised that this item could be continued if the committee desired,
so that staff could provide more information. Scheuer disagreed
with some of the assumptions in the report, as well as the
findings. He felt that it was not for staff or the committee to
determine whether or not this business was necessary, and reviewed
general concerns with the overall analyses and findings.
ADDlicant ResDonse/Committee Questions
Fernando Durazo, the applicant, stated that he had attended
numerous meetings with staff; his operation was small, utilizing a
maximum of ten cars and sometimes as few as three. Mr. Durazo
stated that he had done everything that had been requested of him
by staff, and asked the committee to consider his application.
Chair Wheeland asked Mr. Durazo if he had been operating since 1990
without a business license, as stated in the staff report? Mr.
\'t-s
MONTGOMERY PLANNXNG COMMXTTEE
-4-
NOVEMBER 6. 1991
Durazo responded that he had made numerous attempts to obtain a
business license, but had been denied by staff. Mr. Scheuer stated
that if the applicant had been in the process of attempting to
comply with the business license requirement, he should not be
penalized. Member McFarlin asked about the applicant's operations
prior to occupancy of this site; Mr. Durazo stated that he had
previously been located at a site in northern Chula Vista, but upon
losing his lease had moved to this site, which he rented on a
month-to-month basis. McFarlin asked about his future plans? Mr.
Durazo stated that once he was financially stable, he planned to
purchase a larger property. McFarlin asked how the applicant's
business affected the other businesses on site with regard to
parking? Mr. Durazo responded that it did not affect the other
businesses adversely, and he had received no complaints from the
other tenants.
Member Berlanga stated that he had spoken with the applicant some
time ago and had advised him that he felt this area was not
appropriate for this use. At that time he had suggested to Mr.
Durazo that he park the cars elsewhere and maintain his office
here; he asked staff if this solution would address their concerns?
Mr. Herrera advised that no, this was not permitted.
Member McFarlin asked Carol stinnet to review the code enforcement
proceedings that had taken place. Code Enforcement Officer Carol
Stinnet reviewed the process, which had commenced with an initial
contact in May of 1991. Proceedings included verbal and ~~itten
contacts, and extensions to time limitations; on August 20 she had
sent the applicant a letter giving him an additional 30 days to
file for the Conditional Use permit, and he had filed the
appropriate paperwork before the deadline. In response to
questioning by member McFarlin, Ms. stinnet stated that although
the applicant had used her name in association with his dealings
with staff upon first occupancy of the site, he was in error; her
first contact with him was in May of 1991. McFarlin asked how
staff would control the number of cars permitted? Ms. stinnet
stated that this would have to be a condition of the permit, and
that Code Enforcement would check on the lot if requested to do so.
by the Planning Department. Mr. Herrera-A advised that staff did
not have time to regularly monitor businesses, and that they were
normally visited only upon receiving a complaint. Member McFarlin
stated that she was concerned with the idea that anything on this
property was an improvement; she voiced concerns that Montgomery
was a dumping ground.
Member Scheuer questioned the applicant regarding lighting on the
site. The applicant described the lighting and stated that he had
received no complaints regarding this. Scheuer referred to the
site plan provided by the applicant and asked if any improvements
other than the fence would be provided? Mr. Durazo stated that the
property manager had indicated that some paving repairs would be
t't- ~
MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE
-5-
NOVEMBER 6. 1991
done. Scheuer stated that the staff assessment of the negative
impact of the required masonry wall was also problematic.
Chair Wheeland asked for further public comments; there being none,
she declared the public hearing closed.
Committee Discussion
Member Castro stated that the existing building did not represent
the best utilization of this site. He did not see this as a good
location for a car lot, but felt that at this point in time it
would not adversely affect the area; Castro felt that a Conditional
Use permit with a time limitation would serve both the applicant
and staff's concerns, feeling that the current economic situation
should also be taken into consideration. Member Berlanga concurred
with this, adding that the auto repair shop on the site created
more traffic and parking impacts than did this business. He also
favored placing a time limitation on the permit, along with a
condition that the applicant not park cars along the property's
frontage.
Mr. Herrera-A advised that the applicant would still be required to
provide certain improvements that would place an economic burden on
him. He further stated that approving this permit with a time
limitation would set a precedent, and that retraction of the permit
at a later time would be somewhat complex; it would be up to staff
to prove that this was an unwarranted use, which would be difficult
in light of the original approval. Further, public hearings would
be required.
Member Scheuer stated that he had no reservations about this
business; he pointed out that there were no other applicants
offering to do any improvements to the site, and stated that he saw
this as an acceptable use for the site at this time.
Member McFarlin stated that she was not adverse to the applicant's
goals of conducting a successful business. However, she felt that
the proliferation of this type of use in the Montgomery area
presented problems, and that rules and regulations had been
established to address these types of problems.
Chair Wheeland concurred that it was necessary to follow the
provisions of the Montgomery specific Plan; she agreed that there
were times to make exceptions, but did not feel that this was the
type of business that the area needed more of.
Motion (Wheeland/McFarlin) (2-3, Berlanga, Castro, Scheuer opposed)
to deny PCC-92-12. Motion failed.
Mr. Herrera-A advised that four votes were required for either an
approval or a denial.
\~-1
MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE
-6-
NOVEMBER 6. 1991
Member Scheuer asked staff to outline the applicant's options. Mr.
Herrera-A advised that the applicant could go to the Planning
commission; it was possible that the application would be denied,
however, as this committee had not made a decision either for or
against. Had there been a definitive vote, the outcome would be
easier to anticipate.
Motion (Scheuer/Castro) (3-2, McFarlin and Wheeland opposed) to
permit the car lot with conditions.
Mr. Herrera-A advised that as four votes were required, this motion
also failed. Scheuer asked if the item would be reconsidered by
this board? Mr. Herrera-A responded negatively, stating that the
applicant would have to go to the Planning commission for approval
or denial. Ms. Reid advised that this item would go to the
Planning commission on November 20. Member Scheuer asked if there
was a way that the item could be placed on the agenda so as not to
conflict with the Montgomery Planning meeting? Mr. Herrera-A
stated that there was no way to avoid conflict, as the meeting
times had been concurrent for at least six years. He noted,
however, that the Montgomery Committee met at 6:00 that night,
whereas the Planning commission met at 7:00; therefore, it might be
possible to attend the later meeting.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Mr. Herrera-A advised members that if they desired, business cards
could be provided to members. Motion (Wheeland/McFarlin) (4-0,
Scheuer abstaining) to allow staff to proceed with procuring
business cards for committee members.
COMMITTEE COMMENTS:
Motion McFarlin/Castro (S-O) to request that Rosemary Lane attend
the next meeting to discuss the new library.
Chair Wheeland noted that an invitation had gone out for members to
attend the Boards/Committee/Commissions banquet on November 14.
Mr. Herrera-A advised that members RSVP to the City Clerk's office.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. to the regular meeting of
November 20, at 6:00 p.m., at the Public Services Building.
\~-~
EXCERPT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 4, 1991
ITEM 2:
PUBUC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-92-12; REQUEST
TO ESTABUSH A USED CAR SALES FACILITY AT 1506 BROADWAY-
Fernando Durazo
Planning Technician Pedder gave the background of the project and the various meetings with
the applicant. After working with staff, there was no activity and the project was assumed to
be abandoned. Instead, the applicant had established his business at the current location without
a business license. He was contacted a number of times for application of his conditional use
permit. Upon receipt of a complaint from a resident in the vicinity regarding driveway blockage
around the parking lot of the restaurant, Code Enforcement advised the applicant to obtain a
conditional use permit or cease business at that location. In September, 1991, the applicant
requested a conditional use permit. .
Commissioner Casillas asked what was done to correct the illegal operation, and if the 13
businesses who had signed a petition supporting the conditional use permit had conditional use
permits.
Ms. Pedder stated that as long as an applicant continues to work with staff, they will try to give
him/her leeway. Mr. Durazo had insisted throughout the entire period that he was in the process
of applying for a conditional use permit. Additionally, the City's Code Enforcement staff were
actively working with Mr. Durazo, or on his behalf, to find additional locations where he could
operate where it may not be necessary to obtain a conditional use permit. Ms. Pedder did not
believe Mr. Durazo had returned Code Enforcement staff's calls, but directed his attorney to
call. Alternative sites had been recommended to the attorney. Answering Commissioner
Casillas' query regarding the businesses listed on the petition, Ms. Pedder said that very few had
conditional use permi~ because they were already established at the time of the Montgomery
annexation and were continuing uses.
Commissioner Tuchscher asked Ms. Pedder if staff had been helpful in assisting Mr. Durazo
through the process. Ms. Pedder answered affirmatively, and said a lot of time had been spent
suggesting alternate plans for Mr. Durazo and he was given the benefit of stafrs
recommendations regarding landscaping, lighting, and signage.
Commissioner Tuchscher asked if Zoning Enforcement routinely made suggestions for alternative
locations. Ms. Pedder said that Code Enforcement did attempt to do so in similar situations.
In this case, Planning staff had asked Code Enforcement to assist as much as possible.
Planning Technician Pedder noted that the Commissioners had received at the beginning of the
meeting a petition with signatures of eight business owners who had agreed to the location of
the used car facility at the proposed location.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Fernando Durazo, 272 Rancho Court, Chula Vista, said he had tried to solve the problem and
was forced to move without being given much time. He disagreed that staff had tried to help
him; instead, they tried to discourage him. He had never heard of alternative locations. He
read a letter he had written to the Planning Commission pleading with them to approve the
conditional use permit. .
\Ct -9
Commissioner Casillas said he appreciated Mr. Durazo's comments regarding his desire to be
an entrepreneur, but he felt there was another issue which insisted that certain processes be
followed in order to be granted permission to do certain activities. These rules had to be applied
to everyone. He would support staff's recommendation to deny the conditional use permit.
Commissioner Tuchscher echoed Commissioner Casm~~' comments and added that he had a
strong sensitivity to the small businessman. However, he felt staff had gone beyond the call of
duty to work with the applicant, and would support staff's recommendation to deny.
Chair Fuller said she was not in sympathy in continuing the over proliferation of used car
. dealers in the Montgomery area.
Commissioner Martin commented that he would support staff's recommendation, because there
had to be some rules.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (Carson/Martin) 6-0 (Commissioner Decker absent) that based on the findings contained
in Section 'E' of the report, deny the request, PCC-92-12, to establish a used car sales facility
at 1506 Broadway.
:J
\~-II:)
--
. ..
February 21, 1992
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth ATenue
Chula Vista, :CA 91910
.
Subject: Waiver of Remaining Fees
Conditional Use Permit PCC-92-l2
Used'Car'Facility, 1506 Broadway
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Dear Mayor and City Council:
On December 4, 1991, the planning department denied my request
for subject permit and I did not appeal to the city council.
On September 9, 1991, I mailed a check in the amount of
$1,000.00 to the City of Chula Vista, per the planning
department's request. Copy of canceled check is enclosed.
On December 5, 1991, I received a letter from Steve Griffin,'
Senior Planner, informing me that I still owed $1,874.02 on
the original application. Then, on January 9, 1992, I was
informed that the amount had increased to $2,232.62, which
is over and above the original $1,000.00.
It is beyond my comprehension that the planning department
can charge whatever they want, without any breakdown of
fees incurred. The planning department's fee schedule dated
June - 1990, does not even come close to what they are request-
ing; therefore, I request that you waive ~qe fees in excess
of $1,000.00.
Enclosure
will be, greatly apprec-
Your investigation into this
iated.
V~trU1Y yours,
( ,
\;' '\'~,
\~\.
'a~ o~"~~azo
272 A Ran~O Court
Chula Vista, CA 91911
~~~~LI\)
~"'\ ~
~~~~~\
\i,'~;j' !""-\r::"?'=~"'E~..' ~
' Ir'li 'I '
, .......i:l ';J;"
CO;I>AR:..t; ~ ~f:'''f ~~f': 'r'~1)1~. "",,!,'"
...;s,lo:.~IiI"iiiu~,. -\ I,' "d, l.',~,o,,~
....-...v c; ~''''':;'''.f~'~...
lq -It
CO';;-,', . ~ .~!'. ....
... a:' " 0
~I '" c 0
,- c :l 0
1lO~
'em .Q 0 0
c ,0
~ ~ '~
...... 0,
Cll 0
- .,. 0
"'"' ('~
,,,
\
.~
,--;-r" .
..- ~.,-",::.
CD
......
:10
.N
:.-.
. ~.:
"
~
~
'~
\S-
?i
:;
.1.
C:J
.
en
a:
o
b
:2 ~
>>-
~I;
z"'~
o mu>
(.)~>
w_s
o 5
N .' ~
~. "\
;:)
c
:I ,....
..
o
"II:
>j!:~
lfl!~
...ft,,,
.
'"
.z
-
.z
0
-
0
1:0
'"
t'-
0
.. /
- .'
t'- ,/
.z .
'" .
0
0
0
'"
~~~ '"
Ii: Ii! -
~ is ~
i~1 .
.
'"
<JI
t'-!
,
U'I
'~I t'
l~. iCi)
/0
.
'"
II:
~
,
'.
/
/
/
/
/
!
/
/
/
I
I
I
ENDORSE HERE
/
/
.j.-.
/
rt
,
."
,
Ui
.....
/
"
. -- - -.-.-...... ....._,
!~lF.i:/6tJ 1 1 ~r~B
l\3H;).vO'OOCll . _ " .. '_c_'"
;:l)[;DS-~Z;~::'~:J:j~ ~,.LElflt'.:i;' .. ,~_.
J:i~i~ J.l ;~.,:~j:J ~~.:it.::r -: .< ? :
J.D!t~OT.w.~:n:j S;t..MP OR SIGN BELOW H'IS i...lNE
..... "''"R~E'~vlf":J F?R l=(NAI~CIAlINSTlTUTICI\ ~:,=,..,
.. ',.; ~
~ !I ::. \j ~
..
ir'
i.i"
/
.
~1"\"""'''''''.~,':',~.. ~
. '.' "'..- ',"1
B..,. .:; .'
, ,
P'.l
';'1)
.. ~\;
""
',',f.
:r.
"'i
:i'j
.....
-,
if
Vi
ijil
.;?:~
,f::::
....
:....j
Jji
i..Ui
'j~.'
..~ !'-
""
(.~
. ,:
'I'
'. '11,'
."'....
l" .FEDERAl.RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS REG. CC
/
!
" .
Lf. "."
-.
1,;'0,_:";
,---
~~.'A -.-- (\)
,~ s ~,.,. i- :'.::,
.
,
".
"
-'1.220
(OGSt-
"
...' i!~'"
N =IiM'
. '~~:I
0; "'siii
,. ,0.=
w =....
(/)l=:::S
_~81100
o&&~-
'"i,
.~-
.
.&rJl.
In ~,
~ B'
..J!:. IS
~ ..
:'.-.-
I
i
I'
i
I
'. .:.~r'~f-'"
. .
"
- .'.
~.. ~-
,
.~';>
'.
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PROCESSING AGREEMENT
P..-It Aflpllcent:
Aflpllcent'. Addr...:
Type of P...I t:
Ag..-t D.t.:
Depoalt Aooount:
~;--:~A /~~ A'~
/' u.rCJ
9- o/"?-/'/
J7/6!c)"'-
-
~./ -
C'. Y. 59/?//
This Agreement (MAgreenent.) between the Chy of Chute Viata, . chartered anicipel corporation (.Ch)"') and the
foreMlDld applicant for a developnent perlltt (.Applicant.), .ffective .. of the AgreeMent Date let forth ebove, is Mete with
reference to the following facts:
"".r.... Aflpllcent h.. applied to the City for. pe.-It of the type .for.r.f.renced ("P..-it") which the City h..
reqJlred to be obtained .. . condition to pe.-ittlng Aflpllcant to develap . perc.l of pr_rty; and.
Wher..., the City will incur expense. in onder to process ..id pe~ft through the verfous depert~t. end before the
various boarda end connfa.fons of the City (.proce.sing Services.); and,
Wh.r.... the purpose of this agreement is to reillDurs. the City for all expenses it will incur in cOIY'IKtion with
prOViding the Procelling Services;
Now, therefore, the perti.. do hereby a"ree, in exchange for the .utuel pr~;... herein contained, a. follows:
I. Aflpllcent'. Duty to P.y.
Applicant shell pay all of City'. expenses incurred in providing Processing Services related to Applicant'. Permit,
including III of Cityls direct Ind overhead costs related thereto. This duty of Applicant shill be referred to herein II
-Applicant's Duty to PlY.-
A. Appllc.nt'. D.po.it Duty
AI parti.l perfo...nc. of Appllc.nt'. Duty to P.y. Applicant .hlll deposIt thl aoount .for.referenced ("Dopo.it").
1. City .h.ll ch.rg. Ita l.wful .xpena.. Incurred In providing Proces.lng S.rvices .g.lnlt Aflplicent'. Dopo.lt.
If, after the conclusion of processing Applicantls Permit, any portion of the Deposit reMIins, City shall return said balance
to Applicant without interest thereon. If, during the processing of Appl icant I. PerRIit, the ~t of the Deposit becomes
.xh.usted, or I. lominently likely to become .xh.usted in the opinion of the City. upon notice of .... by City. Applic.nt sh.ll
forthwith provide such IdcUtional deposit as City .hall calculate a. reasonably necessary to conti..... to provide Processing
S.rvlc... Th. duty of Appllc.nt to Initl.lly depoalt and to .uppl_t ..Id deposit II h.reln required ah.ll be known ..
-Appl icantls Deposit Dutytl.
II. City'. Duty.
City .h.ll. upon the condition th.t Appllc.nt I. not In breach of Applicant'. Duty to P.y or Appllc.nt'. Dopo.it Duty.
use good faith to provide processing services in relation to Appl icant IS Pennit application.
A. City .h.ll h.v. no ll.billty h.reunder to Applic.nt for the f.ilur. to proc... Applicant'. P.Mllt appllc.tion. or
for f.llur. to proces. Appllc.nt'. P.rmlt within the tile fr... reqJl.ted by Applicant or eati..ted by City.
I. Iy .x.cutlon of thl. .gr....nt. Appllc.nt .h.ll h.ve no right to the Pe""It for which Appllc.nt h.. applied. City
shill USe itl discretion in evaLuating Applicant'S Penait Applicltion without regard to Applicant's pr~ile to pay for the
Processing Services, or the execution of the AliIreement.
III. I_Ie..
A. Suspension of Processing.
In addition to .ll other rlghts.nd remedlea which the City ah.ll oth.rwl.. h.v..t l.w or equity, the City h.s the right
to suspend Indlor withhold the processinlil of the Pe~it which is the subject ..tter of this Agreement, as well IS the Permit
which ..y be the subject ..tter of any other Permit which Applicant hiS before the City.
g. Civil Coll.ctlon.
In addition to all other rights and r.-dies which the City shall otherwiaehlve at law or equity, the City has the right
to collect all suns which are or ..y become 0Je heret.nder by civil action, and f4'O"I instituting l ftigltion to collect s_, the
prevllllng perty .h.ll be entitled to r...enable .ttorney'. f_ and co.ta.
\Ct..\~
IV. III ocellonoous.
A. Notlc...
All notlc... _nda or _to provided for or pel'llltted to be given pur.uont to thl. Agr_t ...t be In writing.
All notlcu. _ ond requesto to be .ent to any perty sh.ll be _ to h.ve been properly given or .erved If personally
aerved or deposited In the united States NH, adckeued to such perty, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return
rec.lpt requested. .t the oddr..... Identified edjecent to the .Ignatur.. of the pertl.. represented.
.. Governing L.w/V.......
Thl. Agr_t .h.ll be gov.rned by ond conatruocl In eccordone. with the I.ws of the St.t. of C.llfornl.. Any .ctlon
.rl.lng under or r.l.tlng to thl. Agreement sh.ll be brought only In the fedor.l or .tote court. loc.ted In San Diogo County.
State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chule Vilt., or a. close thereto as poalfble. Venue for thh Agreement, and
perforwnc. h.reunder, sh.ll be the City of Chul. VI.t..
C. Multlpl. Slgnatorle..
If th.re .r. oultlple .I.natorl.. to thl. .gr_t on beh.lf of Applicant, oech of such .Ignatorl.. .h.ll be Jointly
n nverally liable for the perfoMl8nce of AppL icantl. duties heretn .et forth.
D. SI.natory Authority.
The Iflnetory to this agreement hereby warrants and represents that to be the duly designated agent for the Applicant
end h.. been duly .uthorhed by the Appllc.nt to .xecut. thl. A.reement on beh.lf of the Applic.nt. Signatory .h.ll be
personally liable for Applicant.. Duty to Pay and AppL icantls Duty to Deposit in the event of non.authorhation to .x~ute this
Agreement by this Appllc.nt.
E. Hold H.rml....
Applicant .h.ll defend, Indemnify ond hold h.rmles. the City. It. elected ond appointed offlc.r. ond omployoa.. from
end '.IInot .ll cl.lms for dema.... ll.blllty. coot end .xpens. (Including without ll.ltltlon .ttorneys' foo.) .rl.;ng out of
processing Applicant'G Pennit, except only for those claims .rising frOll the aole negligence or aole willful conduct of the City,
its officers, or ~loyees. Applicant-s indetmificltion shall include any and all coati, expenses, attorneys' feel and liability
Incurred by the City. it offic.r. .gent., or employ... In defending 1.linot .uch cl.i.., wh.th.r the .... proceocl to Judgment
or not. further, Applicant, at ita own expense, shall, \4D" written request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought
against the City, its officers, agents, or employees. Applicant's indemnification of City shall not be Li_ited by any prior or
subsequent decllrltion by the Appllc.nt.
f. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures.
No luit or arbitration ahall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City unless. claiM ha. first been
pre.ented In writing ond filed with the City of Chull VI.tl .nd .cted upon by the City of Chul. Vilt. in eccordanc. with the
procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vistl MlI1icipal Code, .s same..y from tiMe to time be ....-.ded, the provisions
of which .r. Incorporlted by this r.ferenc. "' If fully ..t forth h.reln. end .uch pollcl.. ond procedur.. used by the City In
the Impleoentltlon of .ome. Upon request by City. Consult.nt .h.ll ..et end confer In good f.lth with City for the purpo.. of
resolving any dispute over the tenms of this Agreement.
Now therefore, the parties hereto, having read and understood the tenms and conditions of this agreement, do hereby
express their consent to the tenms hereof by setting their hand hereto on the date let forth adjacent thereto.
Dlted:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA
by:
City of Chula Vista
D.ted:
;?-o:>-?-J?/
permit2.wp
\11. - \3
~\\r?-
:--...~
~~"'"........
................~........
---
C IlY OF
(HULA VISTA
PlJ\NNI~j~,l DEP^n! ME NT
December 5, 1991
Fernando Durazo
272-A Rancho Court
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Subject: Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit PCC-92-12
Request to establish a used car sales facility at 1506
Broadway.
Your request for a conditional use permit to establish a used car
lot at 1506 Broadway was heard by the Planning Commission on
December 4, 1991.
Based on the findings contained in Planning Commission Resolution
PCC-92-12, a copy of which is attached hereto, the Commission
denied your request by a vote of 6-0.
You have the right to appeal this decision to the City Council.
A completed appeal form along with a fee deposit of $1,000 must be
submitted in order to start the process, along with the amount
still owed for processing of the original application, which now
stands at $1,874.02. The full amount of $2,874.02 must be
received by this office within 10 days of the date of this letter
to initiate the appeal process. Forms are available from the
Planning Department. In the absence of said appeal, the decision
of the planning commission is final.
You are responsible for the outstanding balance of $1,874.02 to
process the original application, regardless of whether or not you
appeal the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council.
Please remit this amount to the Planning Department within ten
days. Your check should be made payable to the City of Chula
vista.
~
Steve Griffin, A.I.C.P.
Senior Planner
'17 V
f
(:7
\.c. ...14
February 27, 1992
DP882, Fernando Durazo, PCC-92-12
Ken Lee
Hours $ Amount
24 $ 428.88
10 249.90
5 155.85
25.25 399.20
$1,233.83 x FCR 2.539 = $3,132.62
Deposit -1,000.00
8alance Due $2,132.62
Martin Miller
Steve Griffin
Ann Pedder
r
l"- - 1$